CAR_Public/010112.MBX               C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

              Friday, January 12, 2001, Vol. 3, No. 9

                             Headlines

AMERITRADE INC: Suit Remanded to State Court; No SLUSA Preemption
CABLETRON SYSTEMS: Ruling on Securities Suit Not Expected Until Late 01
CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER: Action against Insurer Ren Settled Suit Goes on
CASTLE ENERGY: Settlement Underway Re Alleged Underpayment of Gas
ECONOMY CLASS SYNDROME: Affects 400 A Year Flying To Sydney, Expert Says

EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES: May Face Indictment As Former Sears DieHard Supplier
HOLOCAUST VICTIMS: Polish Parliament Approves Law Returning Property
MTBE CONTAMINATION: Multi-Million Dollar Suit Settled For $35,000
OTTAWA: Stuck With Veterans' Legal Bill Estimated At Over $800,000
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: Alpharetta Firm Accused In FL Voting Rights Suit

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: CNN Coverage; Civil Rights Commission Hears Case
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: NAACP Files Lawsuit over Florida Vote
PROPULSID LITIGATION: NLJ Reports on Lawsuit Denney v. Johnson & Johnson
TOBACCO LITIGATION: Cigarettes Emit More Tar Than FTC Says, Expert Says
U S WEST: Minnesotans Share Settlement With Phone-Service Provider Qwest

                             *********

AMERITRADE INC: Suit Remanded to State Court; No SLUSA Preemption
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A breach-of-contract class action against online broker-dealer Ameritrade
Inc. has been remanded to Nebraska state court by a federal judge who
found the suit was not preempted by the Securities Litigation Uniform
Standards Act. Green et al. v. Ameritrade Inc. et al. , No. 00-CV-0256
(D. Neb., Nov. 16, 2000).

The SLUSA, enacted in 1998, preempts any class action that alleges
misrepresentations or omissions of material fact in securities
transactions or that the defendant broker-dealer deceived customers who
purchased securities. The case, when removed to federal court, is then
tried for alleged violations of federal securities law, including the
antifraud provisions contained in Section 10(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act.

The decision at bar marks the second time this case has come before the
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, this time with markedly
different results.

The class action was originally filed in district court in Douglas
County, Neb., by California resident Mitchell Green, who claimed that
Internet broker-dealer Ameritrade failed to obtain real market quotes or
last sales information for derivative options. Ameritrade is a Nebraska
corporation.

The state suit made claims for breach of contract and sought unspecified
compensatory damages for a class of customers who paid $20 a month for
the quote and sales service.

Ameritrade removed the case to Nebraska federal court, where U.S.
District Judge William G. Cambridge denied Green's motion to remand,
finding his state-law breach-of-contract claims to be preempted by SLUSA.
Judge Cambridge then allowed Green to file an amended complaint, and the
case was assigned to U.S. District Judge Richard G. Kopf.

Judge Kopf determined that the breach-of-contract claims in the amended
complaint had cured the SLUSA preemption issue and he remanded the case
back to the state trial court in Douglas County.

"Green originally alleged that 'Ameritrade does not purchase or obtain
real time last sales information from all option exchanges and/or market
makers, yet the subscriber is led to believe that the option quotes on
his/her quote list are in fact real time<>,'" the judge noted.
"By contrast, Green now alleges that 'Ameritrade does not purchase or
obtain real time last sales information from all options exchanges and/or
market makers, yet the subscriber contracts for options quotes, which are
supposed to be real time<>.'"

The difference, the judge said, was that the amended complaint sounded
"purely in contract" and did not raise fraud allegations covered by
federal law. (Corporate Risk Spectrum, December 2000)


CABLETRON SYSTEMS: Ruling on Securities Suit Not Expected Until Late 01
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riverside Networks, a subsidiary of Cabletron, reports in its filing with
the SEC the consolidated class action lawsuit raising claims against
Cabletron and some officers and directors of Cabletron, which was
previously reported in the CAR. The lawsuit was filed in the United
States district court for the district of New Hampshire and, following
transfer, is pending in the district of Rhode Island. The complaint
alleges that Cabletron and several of its officers and directors made
materially false and misleading information about Cabletron's operations
and acted in violation of Section 10(b) of and Rule 10b-5 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the period between March 3, 1997
and December 2, 1997. The complaint also alleges that Cabletron's
accounting practices resulted in the disclosure of materially misleading
financial results during the same period. More specifically, the
complaint challenged Cabletron's revenue recognition policies, accounting
for product returns, and the validity of some sales. The complaint does
not specify the amount of damages sought on behalf of the class.

Cabletron and other defendants moved to dismiss the complaint and, by
order dated December 23, 1998, the district court expressed its intention
to grant Cabletron's motion to dismiss unless the plaintiffs amended
their complaint. The plaintiffs served a second consolidated class action
complaint, and Cabletron has filed a motion to dismiss this second
complaint.

                                Update

A ruling on that motion is not expected earlier than the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2001. If the plaintiffs prevail, Cabletron could be required to
pay substantial damages.

Riverside Networks says the company has not assumed any liabilities from
Cabletron for this litigation  and has not been named as a defendant in
this litigation and none of its officers or directors is named as a
defendant to this litigation.

However, the plaintiffs might attempt to involve Riverside in this
litigation or might seek to have Riverside pay damages if Cabletron has
insufficient assets to cover any resulting damages. Any involvement in
this litigation could be protracted and may result in a diversion of
management and other resources.


CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER: Action against Insurer Ren Settled Suit Goes on
---------------------------------------------------------------------
As previously reported in the CAR, on June 11, 1997, the Company and
certain of its directors and officers had two legal actions filed against
them, one in the United States District Court, Central District of
California, entitled Yourish v. California Amplifier, Inc., et al., Case
No. 97-4293 CBM (Mcx), and the other in the Superior Court for the State
of California,  County of Ventura, entitled Yourish v. California
Amplifier, Inc. et al., Case No. CIV 173569. On June 30, 1997, another
legal action was filed against the same defendants in the Superior Court
for the State of California, County of Ventura, entitled Burns, et al.,
v. California Amplifier, Inc., et al., Case No. CIV 173981. All three
actions were purported class actions on behalf of purchasers of the
common stock of the Company between September 12, 1995 and August 8,
1996. The actions claimed that the defendants engaged in a scheme to make
false and misleading statements and omit to disclose material adverse
facts to the public concerning the Company, allegedly causing the
Company's stock price to artificially rise, and thereby allegedly
allowing the individual defendants to sell stock at inflated prices.
Plaintiffs claimed that the purported stockholder class was damaged when
the price of the stock declined upon disclosure of the alleged adverse
facts. On September 21, 1998, the Federal legal action was dismissed in
the United States District Court. The dismissal was upheld by the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on October 8, 1999.

On March 27, 2000 the trial began for the lawsuit filed in the Superior
Court for the State of California, County of Ventura, entitled Yourish v.
California Amplifier, Inc., et al., Case No. CIV 173569. On March 29,
2000 the parties reached a settlement. The terms of the settlement called
for the issuance by the Company of 187,500 shares of stock along with a
cash payment of $3.5 million, funded in part by insurance proceeds, for a
total settlement of approximately $11.0 million. Of the total settlement,
$9.5 million was accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements for the year ended February 26, 2000 and November 25, 2000. By
Order dated September 14, 2000, the court approved the terms of the
settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice. As of November 25,
2000, the Company had issued 65,625 of the 187,500 shares and paid $2.5
million of the $3.5 million and one of its insurance carriers the
remaining $1.0 million.

In connection with the settlement of the Yourish action, the Company and
certain of its former and current officers and directors have filed a
lawsuit (California Amplifier, Inc., et al. v. RLI Insurance Company, et
al., Ventura County Superior Court Case No. CIV196258), against one of
its insurance carriers to recover $2.0 million of coverage the insurance
carrier has stated was not covered under its policy of insurance.

                                Update

The insurance carrier filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
seeking judgment on the basis, inter alia, that the claims in the Yourish
action for alleged violations of Sections 25400 and 25500 of the
California Corporation Code were not insurable as a matter of law
pursuant to Insurance Code Section 533. The Plaintiffs opposed the motion
and a hearing was held on September 22, 2000. On October 18, 2000, the
Court entered an Order granting the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Judgment was entered on November 9, 2000, and Notice of Entry of Judgment
given on November 15, 2000. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal on
November 21, 2000 and intend to pursue an appeal vigorously.


CASTLE ENERGY: Settlement Underway Re Alleged Underpayment of Gas
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In May 1996, Larry Long, representing himself and allegedly "others
similarly situated," filed suit against the Company, three of the
Company's natural gas marketing and transmission and exploration and
production subsidiaries, Atlantic Richfield Company ("ARCO"), B&A
Pipeline Company, a former subsidiary of ARCO ("B&A"), and MGNG in the
Fourth Judicial District Court of Rusk County, Texas. The plaintiff
originally claimed, among other things, that the defendants underpaid
non-operating working interest owners, royalty interest owners, and
overriding royalty interest owners with respect to gas sold to Lone Star
pursuant to the Lone Star Contract. Although no amount of actual damages
was specified in the plaintiff's initial pleadings, it appeared that,
based upon the volumes of gas sold to Lone Star, the plaintiff may have
been seeking actual damages in excess of $40,000,000.

After some initial discovery, the plaintiff's pleadings were
significantly amended. Another purported class representative, Travis
Crim, was added as a plaintiff, and ARCO, B&A and MGNG were dropped as
defendants. Although it is not completely clear from the amended
petition, the plaintiffs apparently limited their proposed class of
plaintiffs to royalty owners and overriding royalty owners in leases
owned by the Company's exploration and production subsidiary limited
partnership. In amending their pleadings, the plaintiffs revised their
basic claim to seeking royalties on certain operating fees paid by Lone
Star to the Company's natural gas marketing subsidiary limited
partnership.

In April 2000, Larry Long withdrew as a named plaintiff and in September
2000, the Company and the remaining plaintiff agreed to settle the case
for a payment of $250,000 by the Company. The parties are currently
finalizing the settlement agreement, subject to court approval.


ECONOMY CLASS SYNDROME: Affects 400 A Year Flying To Sydney, Expert Says
------------------------------------------------------------------------
About 400 long-haul travellers a year who arrive at Sydney airport may be
suffering the condition involving potentially fatal blood clots, a
leading vascular surgeon said.

A study by Reginald Lord, professor of surgery at St Vincent's Hospital,
Sydney, found that his hospital had treated 122 cases of travel-related
deep vein thrombosis (DVT) over three years.

He estimated that St Vincent's, an inner-city hospital that sees many
tourists and backpackers, would treat 10 per cent of Sydney's DVT cases,
making the annual overall figure about 400.

He said: "Quite often the deaths don't occur until later, typically a
week or two after the clot starts in the leg. So in some cases the link
between the travel and the sudden death may not be recognised."

Of the 14 million long-haul travellers who passed through Sydney each
year, the number affected by DVT was small. But the issue was of
significant concern, and he had been urging airlines for almost a decade
to let doctors carry out proper studies of the condition.

Prof Lord, who is also professor of surgery at the University of New
South Wales, is particularly keen to undertake detailed research in
conjunction with colleagues in London, involving checks of passengers
before and after long-haul journeys.

He said airlines or specialist insurance firms could provide the funding
for such a project, which was "in the best interests of everyone -
passengers, airlines and the medical profession".

More than 1,000 people, including a number of Britons, have contacted an
Australian law firm that is preparing legal action over DVT against 20 of
the world's top airlines, including British Airways and Qantas.

Slater and Gordon, a Melbourne-based firm that specialises in class
actions, has been inundated with queries from alleged victims or their
relatives.

In 47 of these cases, people have died as a result of DVT or ensuing
pulmonary embolism, caused by clots in the leg travelling to the lungs.

The lawsuit is expected to be launched within the next two months, with
cases likely to be conducted on an individual basis rather than as a
class action.

Brendan Sydes, a partner with the firm, said: "We have got blokes in
their 30s who can't run or jog any more because they have suffered this.
There are professional people who were previously required to engage in
frequent international air travel who are now limited in the work they
can do because travel insurance won't cover them for an existing
condition.

"People are saying to us that some simple advice might have allowed them
to take precautionary measures."

Prof John Royle, director of the vascular surgery unit at the Austin and
Repatriation Medical Centre in Melbourne, said incidence levels had not
been properly evaluated but could be "enormous".

In many cases, he said, passengers suffering from minor clots would not
seek medical attention as they would mistake their condition for a simple
calf strain.

"It is not as if this is a rare condition," Prof Royle said. "I have had
it myself, and two friends have died of it. Now at last it seems people
are being made aware of the risks." (The Daily Telegraph(London), January
11, 2001)


EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES: May Face Indictment As Former Sears DieHard Supplier
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares of Exide Technologies fell nearly 12 percent Thursday after the
battery maker revealed it will likely face indictment or a plea agreement
with federal prosecutors investigating its dealings as the former
supplier of Sears DieHard batteries.

The company, the world's largest maker of lead-acid and automotive
batteries, said the plea agreement could include a substantial fine.

"We have cooperated fully with the government in its investigation and we
still hope to resolve this matter," said John Van Zile, Exide's executive
vice president and general counsel.

Exide's stock was down $1.19 at $8.44 in early afternoon trading on the
New York Stock Exchange.

The U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Illinois is investigating
whether former officials with Exide and Chicago-based Sears, Roebuck and
Co. knowingly sold inferior batteries under the DieHard label. Sears
denies the allegations and has accused Exide in a lawsuit of bribing a
buyer for the retailer for inside information on a battery-supply
contract.

The company has had a round of legal troubles ever since the fallout with
the retailer and charges that the company engaged in financial
misconduct, mislabeled batteries and tried to pass off old batteries as
new to consumers. Sears alleged in a lawsuit that its former battery
buyer received $20,000 from Exide.

Exide has replaced its senior management team, paid nearly $2.8 million
to settle allegations by the Florida attorney general and agreed to pay
more than $ 10 million to resolve a class-action lawsuit against it. The
company continues to face other lawsuits and state investigations, in
addition to the federal probe.

"While we are disappointed that the investigation could result in a fine,
it does not detract from our accomplishments and is not deterring us from
moving forward aggressively with our plans to continue taking advantage
of the exciting opportunities in our key markets," said Exide chairman
and chief executive Robert A. Lutz.

The company, which moved its headquarters from Reading, Pa., to Princeton
in September, declined further comment.

Automotive batteries account for 65 percent of sales for Exide, which
also makes batteries for farm equipment, golf carts, boats, submarines
and U.S. Army tanks. It has more than 16,000 employees. (The Associated
Press State & Local Wire, January 11, 2001)


HOLOCAUST VICTIMS: Polish Parliament Approves Law Returning Property
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Parliament approved Thursday a long-delayed law compensating Polish
citizens whose property was seized under communist rule between 1944-62
but only those who retain Polish citizenship.

The law was mired in 1 1/2 years of bitter disagreement over how to limit
the government's financial liability while easing international pressure
on Poland to finally compensate people whose property was seized
including many Jews who fled communist-era persecution.

The law's sponsor, Solidarity lawmaker Tomasz Wojcik, expressed hope that
the law lifts the threat of class-action lawsuits by Jewish groups in the
United States seeking the return of private Jewish property.

While a 1997 law governs return of communal Jewish property, this is the
first that in any way addresses the return of individual Jewish property,
including assets seized by the communists when they took power.

''This is a historic moment,'' Wojcik said after lawmakers passed the law
by a vote of 225-186 with five abstentions.

The government estimates that some 170,000 eligible claims will cost
about 43 billion zlotys (dlrs 10 billion).

The law allows for the return of 50 percent of any property seized from
Polish citizens or its equivalent either to the original owners or direct
heirs but only if they held Polish passports on Dec. 31, 1999.

The law, which also compensates Poles resettled after borders shifted
following World War II, must be approved by the Senate and signed by
President Aleksander Kwasniewski.

While welcoming the prospect of restitution a full decade after the fall
of communism, advocates for property owners criticized the law both for
limiting compensation to 50 percent and for excluding emigres and their
heirs who lack Polish passports.

''It's a scandal that heirs to Polish World War II soldiers who emigrated
will be exempted from restitution because they don't have Polish
citizenship,'' said Tadeusz Koss, head of the Property Owners'
Association.

It was the ex-communist contingent in parliament that fought hardest to
limit compensation, saying it would bankrupt the government. They sought
a 10-percent cap, but were overruled.

''It hurts the nation's possibilities of development,'' said Marek
Borowski, a member of the ex-communist Democratic Left Alliance who is a
deputy parliament speaker.

In cases where the property cannot be recovered or is of exceptional or
strategic value such as castles, forest, roads, or mines the government
will issue restitution in the form of state-guaranteed bonds. (AP
Worldstream, January 11, 2001)


MTBE CONTAMINATION: Multi-Million Dollar Suit Settled For $35,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A multi-million dollar lawsuit against companies responsible for the use
of MTBE in gasoline has been settled for $35,000, most of it coming from
a motorist's car insurance.

The suit was filed in Cumberland County Superior Court in 1998 by five
homeowners from Standish, Litchfield, Casco, Cumberland. It grew out of
the sale of gasoline containing methyl tertiary butyl ether, a chemical
additive designed to reduce smog.

Maine began requiring the sale of the reformulated fuel to meet federal
clean-air mandates in southern Maine in 1995. The state discontinued the
sale of the gas three years later after MTBE began turning up in
groundwater.

Plaintiffs in the lawsuit included several people whose wells were
contaminated with the chemical. Others were concerned about the threat of
contamination and wanted chemical companies to foot the bill for testing.

The defendants, including Arco Chemical Co., Atlantic Richfield Co.,
Lyondell Chemical Co., the American Petroleum Institute and the
Oxygenated Fuels Association, were accused of negligent
misrepresentation, civil conspiracy and fraud for failing to warn of the
potential for water contamination.

But the plaintiffs failed to win certification as a class, meaning they
could not sue on behalf of other people affected.

William Kayatta, a lawyer who represented Arco Chemical Co. and Lyondell
Chemical Co., said the defense was able to show that state and federal
environmental regulators were aware that MTBE mixed easily with water and
could spread in groundwater. But regulators determined that the benefits
to air quality were worth the potential harm to groundwater, he said.

Plaintiff Michael Millett of Standish was one of the first in Maine whose
well was found to contain high levels of MTBE contamination. The source
of the chemical was traced to gasoline that spilled from a car involved
in a rollover accident.

That led to Commercial Union, which insured the car, to pay $25,000
toward the settlement. The remaining $10,000 came from Atlantic Richfield
Co., an oil company that once manufactured the chemical.

Kayatta said the defense insisted the settlement be open to public
inspection to demonstrate that his clients, the current manufacturers of
the chemical, did nothing wrong.

"Their position nationwide has been we did absolutely nothing wrong,"
Kayatta said. "The government and the refiners asked us to make this
ingredient for gasoline that would clean up the air and it behaved
exactly as we said." (The Associated Press State & Local Wire, January
11, 2001)


OTTAWA: Stuck With Veterans' Legal Bill Estimated At Over $800,000
------------------------------------------------------------------
The federal government has lost another round in a class-action suit on
behalf of disabled veterans and their heirs, owed as much as $ 2 billion
in back interest payments. Justice John Brockenshire ruled on January 10
the government will have to pay as much as 100 per cent of the veterans'
legal costs, currently estimated at just over $ 800,000. Brockenshire
declared the Crown acted in a "reprehensible" manner in withholding the
interest payments for decades prior to 1990. (The London Free Press,
January 11, 2001)


PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: Alpharetta Firm Accused In FL Voting Rights Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
A nearly unprecedented coalition of national civil rights organizations
went to federal court, seeking to end Florida voting practices they say
disenfranchised African-American voters in November.

Georgia also figured in the federal lawsuit, which the National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People and five other groups
had threatened for weeks. The lawsuit accused Choicepoint Inc., a data
research firm based in Alpharetta, of providing Florida officials with
erroneous information as to which residents were ineligible to vote in
the presidential election. Many of those kept from voting because of that
information were African-American, the lawsuit contends.

Along with Choicepoint, the lawsuit named Florida Secretary of State
Katherine Harris and Florida elections director Clay Roberts, as well as
several county election supervisors. Harris and Roberts are blamed in the
suit for permitting a dysfunctional voting system and faulty machinery,
which civil rights groups say barred tens of thousands of residents of
African- American communities from voting.

"The nation . . . and the civil rights community was appalled at what
appeared to be an absolute disrespect of the right to vote of persons of
color," said Dennis Hayes, NAACP general counsel.

A Choicepoint representative said the company had not yet been served
with the lawsuit and therefore could not comment. But in December and
again Wednesday, Choicepoint issued a statement that appeared to shift
blame to the state of Florida.

"Florida law prevents names from being removed from the voting roll
unless the information is confirmed by local officials --- not us," the
statement read.

Neither Harris nor Roberts could be reached for comment.

Wednesday's lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Miami, is one of a
number of efforts to combat alleged voting irregularities in the Nov. 7
election in which Republican George W. Bush defeated Democrat Al Gore.
Civil rights organizations have charged that the election was tipped in
favor of Bush because many African-Americans --- who tend to vote
Democratic --- were disenfranchised.

Last week, the American Civil Liberties Union Voting Rights Project,
based in Atlanta, filed a lawsuit alleging voting irregularities in
Georgia. And today, the ACLU is expected to file another federal lawsuit
addressing alleged irregularities in Illinois, said Laughlin McDonald,
director of the ACLU Voting Rights Project.

"I think what happened in Florida got everyone's attention," McDonald
said.

The lawyers for Wednesday's lawsuit said they hoped their legal action
would spur more such action across the country.

Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) has said he received numerous complaints from
students at the Atlanta University Center who said they were registered
to vote but could not because their names were absent from lists. Lewis
applauded the class-action lawsuit.

"People struggled long and hard for the right to vote, and then, after
the signing of the Voting Rights Act, after Selma, (Ala.,) not to have
the votes counted, it is a shame," Lewis said.

The other organizations working on the case are the NAACP Legal Defense
and Educational Fund, a nonprofit organization separate from the NAACP;
the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law; People for the
American Way; and the Advancement Project.

In a related matter, Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, the president-elect's
brother, was scheduled to testify on January 11 before the U.S.
Commission on Civil Rights. The federal panel is investigating whether
minority voters were discriminated against. (The Atlanta Journal and
Constitution, January 11, 2001)


PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: CNN Coverage; Civil Rights Commission Hears Case
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Broadcast on the Cable New Network on January 11, 2001)

Highlight: The 2000 presidential election is history, but the election
battle is not. Civil rights groups continue to fight. They've filed a
class-action lawsuit against Florida election officials charging that
thousands of people were disenfranchised by systemic efforts to keep them
from voting. Today in Tallahassee, the U.S. Civil Rights Commission holds
hearings on voting problems in Florida.

    CAROL LIN, CNN ANCHOR: The 2000 presidential election is history, but
the election battle is not. President Clinton commented on the disputed
results just the other night. And civil rights groups continue to fight.
They've filed a class-action lawsuit against Florida election officials
charging that thousands of people were disenfranchised by systemic
efforts to keep them from voting. And today in Tallahassee, the U.S.
Civil Rights Commission holds hearings on voting problems in Florida.

    CNN national correspondent Gary Tuchman is in the Florida capital.

    GARY TUCHMAN, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): ... for president.

    MARY FRANCES BERRY, U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS: Some bad things
happened to people. The question is why?

    TUCHMAN: Mary Frances Berry is the chairperson of the U.S. Commission
on Civil Rights, which will now hold hearings on what happened in
Florida.

    BARRY: This investigation of voting rights -- potential voting rights
abuses is one of the most important, if not the most important, inquiry
that the Civil Rights Commission has been called upon to make.

    JESSE JACKSON, RAINBOW-PUSH COALITION: Everybody matters. Every vote
matters. We are Americans.

    TUCHMAN: The Civil Rights Commission has presented with evidence,
charging African-American communities had a higher proportion of the more
problematic punch card ballot machines. Other charges? That many African
Americans were told by poll workers they weren't registered to vote when
they were; and that excess police presence in some precincts intimidated
some African Americans from voting. In addition, complaints come from the
disabled, who say they couldn't vote because they weren't give proper
assistance.

The commission will hear testimony from Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and
Secretary of State Katherine Harris, and will try to determine if
problems that did occur were because of deliberate actions, or due to
things like inattention. BERRY: It's inattention, inaction, insensitivity
and efficiency. We will say that. And if it is inefficiency and
inattention, to me that is just as negligent and just as reprehensible as
in some outright fashion getting together and try to prevent people from
voting. Because however you cut it, that's interference with the right to
vote.

    TUCHMAN: The commission could recommend remedies to Congress, the
president and law enforcement. It has already made some initial
determinations. What are they?

    BERRY: We would absolutely not tell anyone any findings.

    TUCHMAN: That information remains secret until the investigation is
over.


PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: NAACP Files Lawsuit over Florida Vote
------------------------------------------------------------
Voting irregularities in Florida in the presidential election caused a
disproportionate number of ballots cast by black voters to be
invalidated, the NAACP claims in a class-action lawsuit filed Wednesday.

The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Miami, seeks a variety of
voting reforms and technological improvements to ensure that
irregularities that occurred Nov. 7 are not repeated.

"We move today for justice that guarantees that every vote counts and
will count equally," said Dennis Hayes, the NAACP's general counsel.

The lawsuit was filed as the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights was set to
convene a fact-finding hearing in Tallahassee over voting irregularities.

The NAACP suit, which has been joined by six other civil rights groups,
charges that the irregularities -- which included equipment malfunctions,
poorly prepared poll workers and an election roll purge of qualified
voters' names -- violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and equal
protections guaranteed by the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.

Theodore Shaw, a lawyer for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, said the Voting
Rights Act does not require the plaintiffs to prove that Florida
officials intentionally sought to deny black voters their vote.

Named as defendants are: Florida Gov. Jeb Bush; Secretary of State
Katherine Harris; election supervisors in seven counties; and
Choicepoint, Inc., a Georgia firm hired by Florida state officials to
purge felons and other ineligible names from voter registration lists. In
the election aftermath, county election officials conceded that eligible
voters were purged from the lists erroneously.

Elizabeth Hirst, Bush's press secretary, said the governor would not
comment on the lawsuit until it had been reviewed by his lawyers.

The lawsuit also seeks to rid Florida of its punch-card voting machine,
the equipment that produced the infamous chads Americans came to know
during the Florida recount. The punch-card machine, used in 25 counties,
has an error rate in recording votes nearly three times higher than
electronic voting systems used in 41 of Florida's 67 counties. (One
county uses paper ballots.)

Black precincts disproportionately use punch-card balloting systems;
therefore they are "less likely to have their votes counted and
accurately tabulated than other voters in the state," the suit alleges.

Eliot Mincberg, a lawyer for People For the American Way, noted Florida
officials are already working on some reforms requested in the suit. (USA
Today, January 11, 2001)


PROPULSID LITIGATION: NLJ Reports on Lawsuit Denney v. Johnson & Johnson
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two drug manufacturers have been hit with a class action brought by
consumers who took the heartburn drug Propulsid and charge they were
never warned that it allegedly can cause heart damage -- and allegedly
led to more than 100 deaths. Attorney Gene Locks of Philadelphia's
Greitzer & Locks, joined by lawyers from five other firms, filed Denney
v. Johnson & Johnson, No. 00-CV-6411. The suit includes claims of
negligence and breach of express and implied warranty.

The CAR previously reported on class action lawsuit in West Virginia
brought by consumer Charles Sprouce against Johnson & Johnson. (The
National Law Journal, January 8, 2001)


TOBACCO LITIGATION: Cigarettes Emit More Tar Than FTC Says, Expert Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual federal tests of cigarette ingredients have yet to identify any
ingredient that, on its own, is a threat to human health, a Maryland
expert testified Thursday.

The 600 ingredients include things like alfalfa, cocoa, ammonia and
caffeine, said Dr. Jack Henningfield, a consultant with Pinney Associates
in Bethesda and a part-time professor at Johns Hopkins University in
Baltimore. He was the first witness in a landmark trial that pits healthy
smokers against the tobacco industry.

Lawyers argued for hours about what Henningfield was going to say or had
already said. By day's end, he had begun to lay the foundation for claims
that some 250,000 West Virginia smokers are entitled to free annual
medical tests, even though they aren't sick.

The class-action lawsuit - the first of its kind to go to trial in the
United States - covers people who have smoked the equivalent of a pack a
day for five years since 1995, but who do not currently have lung cancer
or a pulmonary disease such as emphysema.

The smokers want industry-funded medical tests that cigarette makers
argue are experimental and so far unproven in changing the outcome for
anyone who develops one of those diseases. The tests could cost the
industry as much as $ 500 million.

Using a rubber doll head and a covered glass tube called "Smoky Sally,"
Henningfield showed jurors how tar accumulates in the lungs upon
inhaling. He then used a small utility knife and high-tech overhead
projector to dissect several cigarettes and reveal how well-thought-out
their designs are.

"So, it's not just tobacco that comes out of the ground and gets wrapped
up in paper?" Durand asked.

"It's far from it," Henningfield said, citing the more than 600
ingredients and additives, which in turn generate some 4,000 chemicals
when the cigarette is burned.

Most cigarettes have tiny ventilation holes at the base, which consumers
can, deliberately or accidentally, cover with either their lips or
fingers. Those holes, Henningfield said, are designed to increase the
amount of fresh air a smoker inhales, effectively diluting the
cancer-causing smoke they suck into their lungs.

In Federal Trade Commission tests, machines smoke cigarettes without
covering those holes, so the amount of tar they report a cigarette
contains is actually far lower than what an ordinary smoker is inhaling,
Henningfield said.

Consumers should not rely on those FTC ratings because the machines do
not suck as long or as deeply on the cigarette as a person does, he said.

Another problem with the FTC tar ratings is that the machines burn the
cigarette to within three millimeters of the filter. In practice, smokers
often burn right to the filter, he said. They can do that because the
"overwrap," a small piece of paper that attaches the tobacco tube to the
filter, creates an additional pocket of tobacco.

The agency is working on a way to revise its tests, he said.

Henningfield conceded under cross examination Thursday that the FTC has
never claimed its tests replicate human smoking, because the behavior
varies with the person.

"The machine was not intended to mimic humans ... but it was intended to
be relevant to humans," he said.

For now, however, tobacco companies are required by law to have their
products tested on the FTC machines.

The smokers contend that manufacturers could have designed a cigarette
that exposed people to fewer harmful chemicals, but opted not to. They
say that shows reckless disregard for the health of their customers in
West Virginia.

Industry lawyers argue that smokers have knowingly and voluntarily
exposed themselves to a risk that has been publicized on warning labels
and in the media for nearly 50 years. They say they couldn't have
withheld information that was already common knowledge by the early '50s.

They also say they have developed lower-risk cigarettes, but consumers
don't want them because they taste bad.

Henningfield admitted that he is a longtime opponent of smoking and
advocates increasing taxes on, and prices of, cigarettes. He said
discouraging or eliminating smoking is more important than developing a
"safer" cigarette.

One juror did not report for duty Thursday because she was sick and may
have to be excused. That would leave just two alternates for the
remainder of the trial, which is expected to last more than three months.

One juror was previously excused so he could return to spring semester
classes at his college. (The Associated Press State & Local Wire, January
11, 2001)


U S WEST: Minnesotans Share Settlement With Phone-Service Provider Qwest
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pending final approval from a judge, about 95,000 Minnesota telephone
customers will share a class-action settlement of $5.8 million because
they encountered installment delays by the former U S West.

The settlement received preliminary approval last month from Hennepin
County District Judge Pamela Alexander, who has scheduled an April 17
hearing to consider final approval.

Most affected customers will receive notices and become eligible for bill
credits.

"I think it's a fair and reasonable settlement," said Denver attorney
Daniel Reilly, who represented customers from Minnesota and other states.
"This lawsuit was focused on U S West's conduct. Qwest came in and took
decisive action to put it behind them."

Qwest Communications Corp. purchased U S West last June, inheriting the
company's 14-state local phone service territory as well as complaints
dating to 1993 about delays in getting phones installed.

"We've made a promise to the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission that
we would improve service," said Qwest spokesman Matt Barkett. "Putting
this lawsuit behind us helps us avoid distractions to accomplishing that
primary goal."

In the lawsuit, customers claimed that U S West neglected local telephone
service by failing to expand its local network to accommodate the demand
for service, while putting its resources into cable and wireless
services.

"We're denying any liability in connection with those allegations,"
Barkett said. Settling the lawsuit is "the right thing to do for
customers and shareholders at this point, to put it behind us and
concentrate on improving service," he said.

The average qualifying phone customer in Minnesota will receive less than
$60 in bill credits, Barkett said. Most customers will receive claims
forms in the mail, but those who don't can request them after final court
action. (The Associated Press State & Local Wire, January 11, 2001)


                             *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N  I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by Bankruptcy
Creditors' Service, Inc., Princeton, NJ, and Beard Group, Inc.,
Washington, DC. Theresa Cheuk, Managing Editor.

Copyright 1999.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be
reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $575 for six months delivered via e-mail.
Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same firm for the
term of the initial subscription or balance thereof are $25 each.  For
subscription information, contact Christopher Beard at 301/951-6400.


                    * * *  End of Transmission  * * *