CAR_Public/170531.mbx              C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R


            Wednesday, May 31, 2017, Vol. 19, No. 108



                            Headlines

AETNA INC: Court Certifies Plan Participants Class in "Meidl" Suit
ALBERTO'S CONSTRUCTION: "Salto" Suit Claims Unpaid Overtime Pay
ALLIANCE COLLECTION: Placeholder Class Certification Motion Filed
ALLPRO STAFFNET: Hodge Seeks Certification of FLSA Collective Suit
AMERICAN HONDA: "Preston" Hits Denied Warranty on Wiring Defect

AMERICAN INTEGRATED: "De La Torre" Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages
AT&T CORP: "Thompson" Sues Over Auto-dialer Calls
AUDIT SYSTEMS: Woodward Files Placeholder Class Cert. Bid
AUTOZONE INC: Hernandez Moves to Certify Disabled Persons Class
BAJA SERVICES: Bid to Certify Class in Able Home Suit Denied

BB&T CORP: Collections Reps Class Certified in "Sheffield" Suit
BITESQUAD.COM: "Damasco" Class Cert. Bid Continued to June 15
BONA 1372 INC: Reyes Seeks Conditional Certification of FLSA Suit
CAVALRY PORTFOLIO: Grosz et al. Seek to Certify Class
CARIBBEAN CRUISE: "Gordon" Suit Seeks to Certify Class

CBE GROUP: Certification of Class Sought in "Vytlacil" Suit
CENTRAL REFRIGERATED: Applicants Class Certified in "Banks" Suit
CLEANSOURCE INC: "Padilla" Seeks Overtime Pay, Damages
COMERICA INC: Ajekwu Moves to Certify Class of ABCMs Under FLSA
COMPADRES INC: "Fuentes" Suit Seeks Unpaid Overtime Wages, Tips

CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING: Cooley's Bid to Certify Class Continued
CPI SECURITY: Court Certifies Class of Security Officers
CREDIT CONTROL: Faces "Dykes" Suit in Eastern Dist. of New York
DEBT RECOVERY: "Garcia" Hits Collection Calls from Auto-dialer
DESARROLLADORA HOMEX: Godie Corp. Sues Over Securities Fraud

EDGEWATER HEALTH: Pinto Seeks Unpaid Wages Under Labor Code
ENCORE RECEIVABLE: Beaufrand Files Placeholder Class Cert. Bid
FLOWERS FOODS: Martins Moves to Certify Class of Distributors
FRONTLINE ASSET: "Nedd" Sues Over Collection Letter
GHP MANAGEMENT: Lewis Seeks Regular & OT Wages Under Labor Code

HARVARD PILGRIM: "Vorpahl" Sues Over Denied Therapy
HEMBREE GROUP: "Stokes" Labor Suit Seeks Unpaid Overtime Wages
HIGHMARK HEALTH: Presque Isle Claims Shortchanged on Medical Bill
IBEX CONSTRUCTION: Fails to Pay Contract Balance, Suit Claims
IBM CORP: "Rader" Suit Seeks Unpaid Back and Overtime Wages

INTELLICALL CORP: "Naiman" Sues Over Illegally Faxed Ads
INTERCONTINENTAL CAPITAL: "Bohlke" Suit Seeks to Certify Classes
INTERNATIONAL BANK: "Carabalo" Suit Seeks Class Certification
INTERNET GOLD: Pelephone Still Faces Claim on Smart Call Service
INTERNET GOLD: Unit Still Defends Overseas Call Overcharges Suit

INTERNET GOLD: Unit Still Defends Action on Unused Overseas Plan
INTERNET GOLD: 4 Lawsuits v. Pelephone Ended in 2016, Early 2017
INTERNET GOLD: Civil Class Action vs. Bezeq Still Ongoing
INTERNET GOLD: Moreshet Content Filtering Service Suit Ongoing
INTERNET GOLD: Bezeq Int'l Still Defends Overseas Call Lawsuits

INTERNET GOLD: Bezeq Int'l Defends Suit on Misleading 100MB Plan
INTERNET GOLD: Phone Card Lawsuits vs. Bezeq Int'l Ended in 2016
INTERNET GOLD: Apartment Residents Lawsuit vs. DBS Still Ongoing
INTERNET GOLD: Suit vs. DBS on Electronic Advertisements Ongoing
INTERNET GOLD: Unit Still Faces Customer Discrimination Lawsuit

INTERNET GOLD: VOD Premium Content Suit vs. DBS Still Ongoing
INTERNET GOLD: Suit on Subscription Freezing Agreement Continues
INTERNET GOLD: Class Suit vs. DBS on Children's Channel Underway
INTERNET GOLD: DBS Settles Lawsuit on Channel 5+ Disconnection
INTRA-CELLULAR: "Yoo" Hits Share Price Drop Over Drug Safety

KANG REGENCY: Faces "Mares" Suit in Southern Dist. of New York
KOHL'S CORP: Court Denies ERC's Bid to Certify Class Under ADA
LEAP ACADEMY: "Federico" Sues Over Termination of Employment
LOS ANGELES, CA: Court Certified 6th and Hope Damages Subclass
LOS ANGELES, CA: Wins Judgment on Pleadings in "Yagman" Suit

LTD FINANCIAL: Bordeaux Moves for Class Cert.; Hearing on June 5
LVNV FUNDING: Judge Certifies Settlement Class in "Sandoval" Suit
MANAGEMENT NETWORK: "Smith" Sues Over Foreclosure
MARBLECAST OF MICHIGAN: Bid to Certify Sought in "Garner" Suit
MIAMI AUTO MAX: "Vasconcelo" Seeks to Recover Minimum Wages

MILK RIVER: Faces "Jones" Suit in Eastern Dist. of New York
MMODAL SERVICES: "Seijas" Seeks OT Pay for Off-the-Clock Work
MONTGOMERY, AL: Carter Moves for Class Certification
MOPHIE INC: Stotz Seeks Certification of Class and Two Subclasses
MOSEX EXHIBIT: Faces "Kiler" Suit in Eastern District of New York

MSI INVENTORY: "Roush" Seeks Unpaid Overtime, Missed Breaks
MYLAN INC: Self-Insured Schools Hits Overpriced Albuterol Sulfate
NESTLE USA: McFarland's Motion to Certify Class Denied as Moot
NU-WAY TRANSPORTATION: Leadingham Seeks to Certify Drivers Class
PIER ENTERPRISES: Reyes Seeks Class Cert.; Hearing Set for Aug. 7

PERMANENTE MEDICAL: Seeks OK of $6.2MM "Brown" Class Settlement
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY: Faces "Bereket" Suit in W.D. Washington
PREMIER DERMATOLOGY: Smith et al. Seek Class Certification
PROFESSIONAL CLAIMS: Faces "Klain" Suit in E.D. New York
PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS: "Talarico" Suit Seeks Damages, Overtime Pay

REAL CARE: Faces "Nesterenko" Suit in New York Supreme Court
RICH PRODUCTS: Plaintiffs Seek to Notify Route Sales Reps
RIVER LOUNGE: "Navarro" Seeks Overtime, Sues Over Missed Breaks
ROBERTSON COUNTY, TN: Class Certification Sought in "Cross" Suit
ROYAL SEAS: "McCurley" Hits Telemarketing Calls via Auto-dialer

SAGUARO LANDSCAPING: "Perez" Seeks Unpaid Wages, Overtime Pay
SALTOTO INC: Faces "Arriola" Suit in Southern Dist. of New York
SCHURMAN RETAIL: "Sung" Sues Over Data Security Breach
SCI DIRECT: "Strache" Sues Over Unsolicited Telemarketing Calls
SECURE ONE: Faces "Israni" Suit in Central Dist. of California

SFPP RIGHT-OF-WAY CLAIMS: Court Denies Class Certification
SILVER BAY: "Schwartz" Finds Tricon Merger Deal Inadequate
SOUTH CAROLINA: Mental Health Commission Faces Class Suit
SPECTRUM SOFTWARE: Comprehensive Health Seeks Class Certification
SPOTIFY USA: Ingalls et al. Seek to Certify Class & Subclass

SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY: Faces "Minerva" Suit in N.Y. State Court
SUPERIOR LABOR: "Pineda" Action Seeks Unpaid Overtime Pay
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION: Court Won't Certify Class in "Mares" Suit
TRANS WORLD: "Roper" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime
TRANSAMERICA LIFE: "Gordon" Suit Seeks Certification of Classes

TRUSTCO BANK: "Dejkunchorn" Suit Seeks Certification of Class
U.S. BANK: Dolegiewicz Sues Over Force-Placed Insurance Policies
UNION PACIFIC: Cert. Bid in Right-of-Way Suit Under Submission
VERITY HEALTHSYSTEM: Faces "Johns" Suit Over Security Breach
W BBQ: Faces "Walker" Suit in Eastern District of New York

WARREN, MI: Court Certifies Two Classes in NILI Suit
WESTERN DENTAL: "King" Sues Over Unauthorized Account Debiting
WORLD SERVICE: "Umana" Sues Over Wage & Hour Laws Violations
YAHOO! INC: "Wahl" Suit Removed to N.D. Cal.
YES HOSPITALITY: "Schrank" Suit Moved to S.D. Florida

ZILLOW INC: Accused of Wrongful Conduct Over Property Listing
ZODIAC SERVICES: "Uribe" Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages Under Labor Code








                            *********


AETNA INC: Court Certifies Plan Participants Class in "Meidl" Suit
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Janet C. Hall granted in part and denied in part the
Plaintiff's motion for class certification in the lawsuit entitled
CHRISTOPHER MEIDL v. AETNA, INC. et al., Case No. 3:15-cv-01319-
JCH (D. Conn.).

The Court certifies the TMS Class, which consists of:

     all participants or beneficiaries in Aetna Plans
     administered by Aetna (or any of its operating divisions)
     who, from September 3, 2009, to July 29, 2016, were denied
     health insurance coverage for TMS for the treatment of major
     depression using one of the codes for Experimental,
     Investigational, or Unproven Services.  The TMS Class
     includes both persons whose post-service claims for
     reimbursement were denied and persons whose pre-service
     requests that Aetna confirm coverage for TMS were denied.

Christopher Meidl brings the action, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated, alleging that the Defendants improperly
adopted and implemented a policy to deny insurance coverage for
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) therapy, as a treatment
for Major Depressive Disorder.  Specifically, with respect to all
putative class members, the Corrected Amended Complaint alleges
(1) that the defendants violated their fiduciary obligations under
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, (2) that Aetna
violated the terms of class members' health plans, and (3) that
the Defendants unjustly enriched themselves.

Judge Hall also appoints Christopher Meidl as class representative
and Zuckerman Spaeder LLP and Psych-Appeal, Inc., as co-lead class
counsel.  However, to the extent that the Corrected Amended
Complaint seeks an order permanently enjoining the Defendants from
treating TMS as experimental or investigational in the future, the
Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why such portion of the
Corrected Amended Complaint should not be dismissed for lack of
standing.  The Motion for Class Certification as to that claim is
denied.

The Court also grants, absent objection, the Defendants' motion to
seal the unredacted version of their brief and supporting
materials.

A copy of the Ruling is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=kfFbdM1D


ALBERTO'S CONSTRUCTION: "Salto" Suit Claims Unpaid Overtime Pay
---------------------------------------------------------------
Robinson Salto, on behalf of himself, individually, and on behalf
of all others similarly-situated, Plaintiff, v. Alberto's
Construction, LLC and Carlos Rivera-Salto, individually,
Defendants, Case No. 7:17-cv-03583 (S.D. N.Y., May 12, 2017),
seeks damages sustained, including all unpaid wages and any short
fall between wages paid and those due, liquidated damages and any
other statutory penalties as recoverable, costs and disbursements
incurred including reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness fees
and other costs, service payment to Plaintiff, pre-judgment and
post-judgment interest and such other and further relief for
violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Laws.

Defendants operate a construction business that completes various
projects, such as installing stone, brick, and concrete, in
commercial and residential buildings in New York, Massachusetts
and Connecticut where Plaintiff worked as a construction worker.
Salto claims to be denied overtime pay for hours rendered in
excess of 40 hours per work week and did not receive wage
statements. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      David D. Barnhorn, Esq.
      Alexander T. Coleman, Esq.
      Michael J. Borrelli, Esq.
      BORRELLI & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C.
      1010 Northern Boulevard, Suite 328
      Great Neck, NY 11021
      Tel. (516) 248-5550
      Fax. (516) 248-6027


ALLIANCE COLLECTION: Placeholder Class Certification Motion Filed
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned, MARY NILAND, Individually and on Behalf of
All Others Similarly Situated, the Plaintiff, v. ALLIANCE
COLLECTION AGENCIES, INC., the Defendant, Case No. 2:17-cv-00722-
NJ (E.D. Wisc.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order
certifying a class, appointing the Plaintiff as its
representative, and appointing Ademi & O'Reilly, LLP as its
Counsel, and for such other and further relief as the Court may
deem appropriate.

The Plaintiff further asks the Court to stay the class
certification motion until an amended motion for class
certification is filed, and that the Court grant the parties
relief from the local rules' automatic briefing schedule and
requirement.

To avoid the risk of a defendant mooting a putative class
representative's individual stake in the litigation, the Seventh
Circuit in Damasco instructed plaintiffs to file a certification
motion with the complaint, along with a motion to stay briefing on
the certification motion until discovery could commence. Damasco
v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891 (7th Cir. 2011), overruled,
Chapman v. First Index, Inc., 796 F.3d 783, 787 (7th Cir. 2015).

As this motion to certify a class is a placeholder motion as
described in Damasco, the parties and the Court should not be
burdened with unnecessary paperwork and the resulting expense when
a one paragraph, single page motion to certify and stay should
suffice until an amended motion is filed, the Plaintiffs contend.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=4amK8nt3

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Shpetim Ademi, Esq.
          John D. Blythin, Esq.
          Mark A. Eldridge, Esq.
          Denise L. Morris, Esq.
          ADEMI & O'REILLY, LLP
          3620 East Layton Avenue
          Cudahy, WI 53110
          Telephone: (414) 482 8000
          Facsimile: (414) 482 8001
          E-mail: sademi@ademilaw.com
                  jblythin@ademilaw.com
                  meldridge@ademilaw.com
                  dmorris@ademilaw.com


ALLPRO STAFFNET: Hodge Seeks Certification of FLSA Collective Suit
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit entitled ELIZABETH HODGE and others
similarly situated v. ALLPRO STAFFNET LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,
Case No. 3:17-cv-00065 (M.D. Tenn.), moves the Court to:

   (1) authorize the case to proceed as a collective action for
       overtime violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act, on
       behalf of numerous employees of the Defendant, who were
       erroneously classified as "independent contractors" and
       denied proper overtime compensation;

   (2) direct the Defendant to immediately provide a list of
       names, last known addresses, and last known telephone
       numbers for all putative class members, who worked for the
       Defendant within the last three years;

   (3) direct that notice be prominently posted at the various
       Middle Tennessee facilities where the Defendant places its
       workers, attached to current workers' next scheduled
       paycheck, and be mailed to the workers so that they can
       assert their claims on a timely basis as part of this
       litigation; and

   (4) order that the opt in plaintiffs' Consent Forms be deemed
       "filed" on the date they are postmarked.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=vwZufdJQ

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Michael L. Russell, Esq.
          Emily S. Emmons, Esq.
          GILBERT RUSSELL McWHERTER SCOTT BOBBITT PLC
          341 Cool Springs Boulevard, Suite 230
          Franklin, TN 37067
          Telephone: (615) 354-1144
          E-mail: mrussell@gilbertfirm.com
                  eemmons@gilbertfirm.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          William A. Blue, Jr., Esq.
          CONSTANGY, BROOKS, SMITH & PROPHETE, LLP
          410 Commerce Street, Suite 1010
          Nashville TN 37219
          Telephone: (615) 320-5200
          E-mail: zblue@constangy.com


AMERICAN HONDA: "Preston" Hits Denied Warranty on Wiring Defect
---------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Preston, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly-situated, Plaintiffs, v. American Honda Motor Company,
Inc., Defendant, Case No. 1:17-cv-03549 (N.D. Ill., May 11, 2017),
seeks actual, general, special, incidental, statutory, punitive
and consequential damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest
on such monetary relief, injunctive and/or declaratory relief,
including, without limitation, an order that requires Honda to
repair, recall, and/or replace their vehicles and to extend the
applicable warranties to a reasonable period of time, reasonable
costs and expenses incurred in this action, including counsel fees
and expert fees and such other and further relief resulting from
breach of implied and express warranty, unjust enrichment and
violation of the Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act.

Plaintiff leased a 2015 Honda Accord at Muller Honda. It didn't
start when rodents chewed on its electrical wiring. It was then
found out that the wiring insulation is soy-based, thus making it
palatable to rodents. The dealership refused to honor warranty for
said vehicles.

Honda is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of
California and has its principal place of business at 1919
Torrance Boulevard in Torrance, California. It is an overseas
subsidiary of Honda Motor Co., Ltd., a Japanese corporation. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Larry P. Smith, Esq.
     SMITHMARCO, P.C.
     55 W. Monroe Street, Suite 1200
     Chicago, IL 60603
     Tel: (312) 361-1690
     Fax: (312) 602-3911
     Email: lsmith@smithmarco.com

            - and -

     Stacy M. Bardo, Esq.
     BARDO LAW, P.C.
     22 West Washington Street, Suite 1500
     Chicago, IL 60602
     Telephone: (312) 219-6980
     Facsimile: (312) 219-6981
     E-Mail: stacy@bardolawpc.com


AMERICAN INTEGRATED: "De La Torre" Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages
----------------------------------------------------------
JOSE DE LA TORRE, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN INTEGRATED
SERVICES, INC., a California Corporation, and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive, the Defendant, Case No. BC662709 (Cal. Super. Ct., May
24, 2017), seeks to recover sums owed to Plaintiff and Class
Members for Defendant's past failure to pay all regular and wages
and overtime wages due over the last four years, under California
law.

According to the complaint, the Plaintiff was employed by
Defendants in 2012 as a non-exempt employee through his separation
in February 2017, performing duties related to the Defendants
environmental construction, remediation, demolition, abatement,
industrial services, emergency response services, and hazardous
waste business. Plaintiff was tasked with the environmental clean-
up of various construction sites across California, including
sites within Los Angeles County.

American Integrated operate as licensed contractors within the
construction industry providing disposal of hazardous
materials.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          James R. Hawkins, Esq.
          Gregory Mauro, Esq.
          JAMES HAWKINS APLC
          9880 Research Drive, Suite 200
          Irvine, CA 92618
          Telephone: (949) 387 7200
          Facsimile: (949) 387 6676
          E-mail: James@jameshawkinsaplc.com
                  Greg@jameshawkinsaplc.com


AT&T CORP: "Thompson" Sues Over Auto-dialer Calls
-------------------------------------------------
James Thompson, individually and on behalf of others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. AT&T Corp., Defendant, Case 1:17-cv-03607
(N.D. Ill., May 12, 2017) seeks redress for AT&T's practice of
calling the cellular telephone numbers of the Plaintiff using an
automatic telephone dialing system and prerecorded voice, in
violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Plaintiff has received multiple calls to his cellular telephone
using an automatic telephone dialing system. AT&T did not have
permission or consent to make the calls, says the complaint. [BN]

Plaintiffs are represented by:

     Alexander H. Burke, Esq.
     Daniel J. Marovitch, Esq.
     BURKE LAW OFFICES, LLC
     155 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 9020
     Chicago, IL 60601
     Tel: (312) 729-5288
     Fax: (312) 729-5289
     Email: ABurke@BurkeLawLLC.com
            dmarovitch@burkelawllc.com


AUDIT SYSTEMS: Woodward Files Placeholder Class Cert. Bid
---------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit styled MARANDA WOODWARD, Individually and on
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, the Plaintiff, v. AUDIT
SYSTEMS, INC., the Defendant, Case No. 2:17-cv-00736-JPS (E.D.
Wisc.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order certifying
a class, appointing the Plaintiff as its representative, and
appointing Ademi & O'Reilly, LLP as its Counsel, and for such
other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate.

The Plaintiff further asks that the Court stay this class
certification motion until an amended motion for class
certification is filed, and that the Court grant the parties
relief from the local rules' automatic briefing schedule and
requirement that Plaintiff file a brief and supporting documents
in support of this motion.

To avoid the risk of a defendant mooting a putative class
representative's individual stake in the litigation, the Seventh
Circuit in Damasco instructed plaintiffs to file a certification
motion with the complaint, along with a motion to stay briefing on
the certification motion until discovery could commence. Damasco
v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891 (7th Cir. 2011), overruled,
Chapman v. First Index, Inc., 796 F.3d 783, 787 (7th Cir. 2015).

As this motion to certify a class is a placeholder motion as
described in Damasco, the parties and the Court should not be
burdened with unnecessary paperwork and the resulting expense when
a one paragraph, single page motion to certify and stay should
suffice until an amended motion is filed, the Plaintiffs contend.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=tszuRuuI

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Shpetim Ademi, Esq.
          John D. Blythin, Esq.
          Mark A. Eldridge, Esq.
          Denise L. Morris, Esq.
          ADEMI & O'REILLY, LLP
          3620 East Layton Avenue
          Cudahy, WI 53110
          Telephone: (414) 482 8000
          Facsimile: (414) 482 8001
          E-mail: sademi@ademilaw.com
                  jblythin@ademilaw.com
                  meldridge@ademilaw.com
                  dmorris@ademilaw.com


AUTOZONE INC: Hernandez Moves to Certify Disabled Persons Class
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit captioned KENNETH HERNANDEZ,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v.
AUTOZONE, INC., Case No. 1:15-cv-05593-FB-RLM (E.D.N.Y.), moves
the Court for an order:

   1. certifying this class:

      All persons with qualified mobility disabilities, who have
      visited or will visit any AutoZone store where Defendant
      AutoZone, Inc. owns, controls and/or operates the parking
      facility;

   2. appointing Kenneth Hernandez as the representative
      Plaintiff for the proposed Class; and

   3. appointing the law firms of Carlson Lynch Sweet Kilpela &
      Carpenter, LLP, and Zaremba Brownell & Brown PLLC, as
      counsel for the proposed Class.

A copy of the Notice of Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=pyW0Plfh

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Edwin J. Kilpela, Esq.
          CARLSON LYNCH SWEET KILPELA & CARPENTER, LLP
          1133 Penn Avenue, 5th Floor
          Pittsburgh, PA 15222
          Telephone: (412) 322-9243
          Facsimile: (412) 231-0246
          E-mail: ekilpela@carlsonlynch.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Christopher F. Wong, Esq.
          David Raizman, Esq.
          OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
          400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200
          Los Angeles, CA 90071
          Telephone: (213) 239-9800
          Facsimile: (213) 239-9045
          E-mail: christopher.wong@ogletreedeakins.com
                  david.raizman@ogletreedeakins.com

               - and -

          Evan B. Citron, Esq.
          OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART P.C.
          1745 Broadway
          New York, NY 10019
          Telephone: (212) 492-2500
          Facsimile: (212) 492-2501
          E-mail: evan.citron@ogletreedeakins.com


BAJA SERVICES: Bid to Certify Class in Able Home Suit Denied
------------------------------------------------------------
The Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois made a docket entry on May 4, 2017, in the case captioned
Able Home Health, LLC v. Baja Services, Inc., and John Does 1-10,
Case No. 1:17-cv-02627 (N.D. Ill.), relating to a hearing held
before the Honorable John Robert Blakey.

The minute entry states that after amending its complaint, the
Plaintiff has filed a second preemptive class certification
motion, as well as a motion to enter and continue that motion.
The Court previously denied such motions filed in connection with
the initial complaint.  The present motions, filed in connection
with the Plaintiff's amended complaint, are denied for the same
reasons.  The Notice of Motion date is stricken, and the parties
need not appear.

A copy of the Notification of Docket Entry is available at no
charge at http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=8ElwjS0g


BB&T CORP: Collections Reps Class Certified in "Sheffield" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Terrence W. Boyle granted the Plaintiff's motion for
conditional class certification and Court supervised notice under
the Fair Labor Standards Act in the lawsuit titled RUBY SHEFFIELD,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v.
BB&T CORPORATION, BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, and DOES 1-10,
Case No. 7:16-cv-00332-BO (E.D.N.C.).

The class is defined as:

     All Collections Representatives I and II employed by Branch
     Banking and Trust Company, its subsidiaries, or other
     related entities at its Lumberton, North Carolina call
     center, who were riot paid for the overtime hours they
     worked off-the-clock prior to the start of their shifts from
     [three years prior to the date court-ordered notice is sent]
     through completion of this litigation.

The Plaintiff is a former employee of BB&T, which is in part a
commercial bank organized under the laws of North Carolina, who
was assigned to work as a special assets collection representative
at BB&T's call center facility located in Lumberton, North
Carolina.  The Plaintiff alleges that BB&T required its call
center employees to report to their workstations 10 minutes prior
to beginning their shifts in order to start and login to their
computers and computer programs and applications, but were not
compensated for this time.

The Court also agrees that the notice and forms submitted by the
parties are appropriate.  Accordingly, the Court allows the
Plaintiff to serve notice of the lawsuit on putative class members
by personal e-mail.  The Court directs the Defendants to provide
to the Plaintiff, along with any physical address information, any
personal e-mail addresses of putative class members that the
Defendants have retained.  The opt-in period for collective class
members is 60 days.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=5hM2sBf6


BITESQUAD.COM: "Damasco" Class Cert. Bid Continued to June 15
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer entered an order in the
lawsuit titled Old Town Pizza of Lombard, Inc., the Plaintiff, v.
BiteSquad.com, LLC, et al., the Defendants, Case No. 1:17-cv-03082
(N.D. Ill.), continuing the hearing on Plaintiff's "Damasco"
motion for class certification to June 15, 2017 at 8:45 a.m.

According to the Docket Entry made by the Clerk on May 23, 2017,
the initial status hearing set for May 25, 2017 is stricken and
re-set to June 15, 2017 at 8:45 a.m.

A copy of the Docket Entry is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=eOE3ZdS9


BONA 1372 INC: Reyes Seeks Conditional Certification of FLSA Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jessica Reyes and Gissela Lopez, On Behalf of Themselves and
Similarly Situated Employees v. Bona 1372, Inc., Bona 1900, Inc.,
and Hnreck Nazarian a/k/a Nazarian Enterprises d/b/a IHOP
("International House of Pancakes"), Case No. 1:17-cv-00016-MAC-
ZJH (E.D. Tex.), move the Court to conditionally certify a Fair
Labor Standards Act collective action and order notice sent to
proposed members of a class.

The putative class is properly defined as: "All current and former
employees of Bona 1372, Inc., Bona 1900, Inc. and/or Hnreck
Nazarian a/k/a Nazarian Enterprises d/b/a IHOP ("International
House of Pancakes") or any corporations owned, operated, or
controlled by Hnreck Nazarian who work or worked at any of the
seven (7) IHOP locations Restaurants owned, operated or controlled
by Hnreck Nazarian a/k/a Nazarian Enterprises on or after January
17, 2014, who worked overtime hours but were not paid overtime
wages during all or part of their employment."

Jessica Reyes and Gissela Lopez filed the action on behalf of
themselves and other similarly situated current and former
employees pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act.  Through the
filing of their First Amended Complaint, Oscar Atonal was added as
a Plaintiff.

The Plaintiffs also ask the Court to require the Defendants to
provide the information regarding the proposed class members and
to post the notices in both Spanish and English in a conspicuous
location in their subject workplaces.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=fxaYCDwy

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          T. Lynn Walden, Esq.
          David D. Reynard, Jr., Esq.
          WALDENREYNARD, P.L.L.C.
          Post Office Box 7486
          Beaumont, TX 77726
          Telephone: (409) 833-0202
          Telecopier: (409) 832-3564
          E-mail: dreynard@wrtexaslaw.com
                  twalden@wrtexaslaw.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Carolyn D. Roch, Esq.
          HUGHES ROCH LLP
          1200 Smith Street, Suite 1550
          Houston, TX 77002
          Telephone: (713) 588-0890
          Facsimile: (713) 456-2205
          E-mail: cdroch@hughesroch.com


CAVALRY PORTFOLIO: Grosz et al. Seek to Certify Class
-----------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit captioned ROBERT GROSZ and CHAYA GROSZ, on behalf
of plaintiffs and the class members, the Plaintiffs, v. CAVALRY
PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC, the Defendant, Case No. 2:17-cv-03166
(E.D.N.Y.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to certify a class of:

   "(a) all natural persons (b) left messages by Cavalry
   Portfolio Services, LLC which (i) did not state the name of
   the company calling, (ii) did not contain the warning required
   by section 1692e(11), or (iii) asked the recipient to return a
   call to a number answered with "Cavalry Portfolio Services,"
   (c) which were made on or after a date one year prior to the
   filing of this action and on or before a date 20 days prior to
   the filing of this action:".

The Plaintiffs further ask that Edelman, Combs, Latturner &
Goodwin, LLC and the Law Offices of Lawrence Katz be appointed as
class counsel.

Robert and Chaya Grosz ask that the Court enter an order
determining that this action, under the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act, may proceed as a class action against defendant.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=N5VgF9CS

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Tiffany N. Hardy, Esq.
          EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER & GOODWIN, LLC
          20 S. Clark Street, Suite 1500
          Chicago, IL 60603
          Telephone: (312) 739 4200
          Facsimile: (312) 419 0379

               - and -

          Lawrence Katz, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE KATZ PC
          70 East Sunrise Highway, Suite 500
          Valley Stream, NY 11581
          Telephone: (516) 374 2118
          Facsimile: (516) 544 8878


CARIBBEAN CRUISE: "Gordon" Suit Seeks to Certify Class
------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit entitled RICHARD GORDON, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. CARIBBEAN
CRUISE LINE, INC., a Florida corporation, the Defendant, Case No.
1:14-cv-05848 (N.D. Ill.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter
an order:

   1. certifying a class of:

      "all individuals in the United States that: (1) had a text
      message sent to their cellular telephone number by, on
      behalf of, or for the benefit of CCL; (2) using an
      automated telephone dialing system; (3) between February 1,
      2014 and April 1, 2015; (4) whose cellular number appears
      in CCL's records";

   2. appointing Plaintiff as the Class Representative;

   3. appointing Katrina Carroll of Lite DePalma Greenberg, LLC
      ("Lite DePalma") as Class Counsel; and

   4. granting such further relief as this Court deems reasonable
      and just.

According to the complaint, Caribbean Cruise Line is a repeat
violator of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Just
four years ago, Judge Kennelly certified a class of consumers
robocalled by Caribbean Cruise Line. See Birchmeier v. Caribbean
Cruise Line, Inc., 302 F.R.D. 240 (N.D. Ill. 2014), petition for
appeal denied, In re Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc., No. 14-8021 (7th
Cir. Oct. 10, 2014). In that campaign, "[o]ver the course of about
one year, over a million people throughout the United States
received phone calls" asking them to take a political survey in
exchange for a free cruise to the Bahamas. Birchmeier, 179 F.
Supp. 3d 817, 820 (N.D. Ill. 2016).

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=tyG1ls3n

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Katrina Carroll, Esq.
          Kyle A. Shamberg, Esq.
          Ismael T. Salam, Esq.
          LITE DEPALMA GREENBERG, LLC
          211 W. Wacker Drive, Suite 500
          Chicago, IL 60606
          Telephone: (312) 750 1265
          E-mail: kcarroll@litedepalma.com
                  kshamberg@litedepalma.com
                  isalam@litedepalma.com


CBE GROUP: Certification of Class Sought in "Vytlacil" Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------
Theresa Vytlacil and Kim Morgan move the Court to certify the
class described in the complaint of their lawsuit titled THERESA
VYTLACIL and KIM MORGAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others
Similarly Situated v. THE CBE GROUP, INC., Case No. 2:17-cv-00644-
JPS (E.D. Wisc.), and further ask that the Court both stay the
motion for class certification and to grant the Plaintiffs (and
the Defendant) relief from the Local Rules setting automatic
briefing schedules and requiring briefs and supporting material to
be filed with the Motion.

Dicta in the Supreme Court's decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v.
Gomez, left open the possibility that a defendant facing a class
action complaint could moot a class representative's case by
depositing funds equal to or in excess of the maximum value of the
plaintiff's individual claim with the court and having the court
enter judgment in the plaintiff's favor prior to the filing of a
class certification motion, the Plaintiffs assert, citing
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, 136 S. Ct. 663, 672 (2016).

To avoid the risk of a defendant mooting a putative class
representative's individual stake in the litigation, the Seventh
Circuit instructed plaintiffs to file a certification motion with
the complaint, along with a motion to stay briefing on the
certification motion.  Damasco v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891,
896 (7th Cir. 2011), overruled on other grounds, Chapman v. First
Index, Inc., 796 F.3d 783, 787 (7th Cir. 2015) ("The pendency of
that motion [for class certification] protects a putative class
from attempts to buy off the named plaintiffs.").

The Plaintiffs argue they are obligated to move for class
certification to protect the interests of the putative class.
More than one defendant has already attempted the scheme
contemplated in Campbell-Ewald.  See Severns v. Eastern Account
Systems of Connecticut, Inc., Case No. 15-cv-1168, 2016 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 23164 (E.D. Wis. Feb. 24, 2016).  Judge Randa denied the
defendant's request to deposit funds on grounds that a class
certification motion was pending.

As the Motion to certify a class is a placeholder motion as
described in Damasco, the parties and the Court should not be
burdened with unnecessary paperwork and the resulting expense when
short motion to certify and stay should suffice until an amended
motion is filed, the Plaintiffs contend.

The Plaintiffs also ask the Court to appoint them as class
representatives, and to appoint Ademi & O'Reilly, LLP, as class
counsel.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=s0lffPGL

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Shpetim Ademi, Esq.
          John D. Blythin, Esq.
          Mark A. Eldridge, Esq.
          Denise L. Morris, Esq.
          ADEMI & O'REILLY, LLP
          3620 East Layton Avenue
          Cudahy, WI 53110
          Telephone: (414) 482-8000
          Facsimile: (414) 482-8001
          E-mail: sademi@ademilaw.com
                  jblythin@ademilaw.com
                  meldridge@ademilaw.com
                  dmorris@ademilaw.com


CENTRAL REFRIGERATED: Applicants Class Certified in "Banks" Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Dale A. Kimball entered a memorandum decision and order
in the lawsuit titled MELVIN BANKS, on behalf of himself and all
other similarly situated v. CENTRAL REFRIGERATED SERVICES, INC., a
Utah corporation, Case No. 2:16-cv-00356-DAK-PMW (D. Utah):

   * denying the Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of
     subject matter jurisdiction;

   * granting the Plaintiff's amended motion for class
     certification; and

   * denying the Defendant's motion for summary judgment.

The class consists of:

     All natural persons throughout the United States who applied
     remotely for a truck driver position with Central, were the
     subject of a consumer report created by HireRight or
     DriverFACTS and procured by Central for employment purposes
     from March 18, 2010, through February 1, 2014, and against
     whom Central took adverse action based in whole or in part
     upon the consumer report without providing verbal,
     electronic, or written notice within 3 days of taking
     adverse action that the consumer may request a free copy of
     the report and may dispute with the consumer reporting
     agency the accuracy and completeness of the report.

A copy of the Memorandum Decision and Order is available at no
charge at http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=Q2uzlsEp

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Matthew A. Dooley, Esq.
          Stephen M. Bosak, Esq.
          O'TOOLE MCLAUGHLIN DOOLEY & PECORA CO LPA
          5455 Detroit Road
          Sheffield Village, OH 44054
          Telephone: (440) 930-4001
          E-mail: mdooley@omdplaw.com
                  sbosak@omdplaw.com

               - and -

          Ronald Ady, Esq.
          RONALD ADY, PLLC
          8 E. Broadway, Suite 725
          Salt Lake City, UT 84111
          Telephone: (801) 530-3122
          Facsimile: (801) 746-3501

The Defendant is represented by:

          Joseph Kroeger, Esq.
          Mark Morris, Esq.
          SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
          Gateway Tower West
          15 West South Temple, Suite 1200
          Salt Lake City, UT 84101-1547
          Telephone: (801) 257-1900
          Facsimile: (801) 257-1800
          E-mail: jkroeger@swlaw.com
                  mmorris@swlaw.com


CLEANSOURCE INC: "Padilla" Seeks Overtime Pay, Damages
------------------------------------------------------
Hilma Padilla, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Cleansource Inc., Defendant, 7:17-cv-03550
(S.D.N.Y., May 11, 2017), seeks unpaid overtime wages, maximum
liquidated damages and attorneys' fees pursuant to the Fair Labor
Standards Act, New York Minimum Wage Act as well as compensation
for not receiving wage notices and statements required by New York
Labor Laws.

Defendant was engaged in the business of providing cleaning
services within the New York Tri-State Area where Padilla was
employed by Defendant as a manual worker/cleaner. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Abdul K. Hassan, Esq.
      ABDUL HASSAN LAW GROUP, PLLC
      215-28 Hillside Avenue
      Queens Village, NY 11427
      Tel: (718) 740-1000
      Fax: (718) 740-2000
      Email: abdul@abdulhassan.com


COMERICA INC: Ajekwu Moves to Certify Class of ABCMs Under FLSA
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit styled NNENNA M. AJEKWU and DAVID
BUTLER, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated v. COMERICA INCORPORATED, d/b/a COMERICA BANK, Case No.
4:16-cv-02495 (S.D. Tex.), seek conditional certification of a
collective action consisting of:

     All Assistant Banking Center Managers who, at any time
     during the three (3) years immediately preceding the filing
     of this lawsuit, worked at any business that was owned,
     operated, and/or acquired by Defendant, who were not paid
     overtime at a rate of one and one-half times their regular
     rate for hours worked in excess of forty (40) per week
     (collectively, the "ABCMs").

The lawsuit is a collective action filed under the Fair Labor
Standards Act to correct alleged unlawful employment practices,
including the Defendant's failure to abide by wage and hour laws.
The collective action seeks to recover unpaid overtime wages, lost
wages, liquidated damages, and other damages owed by the Defendant
to its current and former employees.

To facilitate the FLSA's collective action provisions, the
Plaintiffs ask the Court: (1) conditionally certify the action for
purposes of notice and discovery; (2) order that judicial notice
be sent to all ABCMs; (3) order the mailing and e-mailing of
notice, along with a reminder notice after 30 days; (4) order the
Defendant to post the Notice and Consent forms in the Defendant's
jobsites/offices for the entire opt-in period; (5) order the
Defendant to produce to the Plaintiffs' Counsel the contact
information for each ABCM within 10 days of the Court order; and
(6) authorize a 60-day notice period for ABMs to join the case.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=aveuX1Ee

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Terrence B. Robinson, Esq.
          Laura A. Hernandez, Esq.
          TERRENCE B. ROBINSON LAW GROUP, PLLC
          1616 S. Voss Rd., Suite 870
          Houston, TX 77057
          Telephone: (713) 568-1723
          Facsimile: (713) 965-4288
          E-mail: TRobinson@TBRobinsonlaw.com
                  LHernandez@TBRobinsonlaw.com


COMPADRES INC: "Fuentes" Suit Seeks Unpaid Overtime Wages, Tips
---------------------------------------------------------------
Jaime Fuentes, in his individual capacity and on behalf of others
similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Compadres, Inc. (d/b/a
Tequila's Family Mexican Restaurant), Tequilas of Thornton LLC
(d/b/a Tequila's Family Mexican Restaurant) and Jose Garcia, an
individual, Defendants, Case 1:17-cv-01180 (D. Colo., May 12,
2017) seeks to recover unpaid or underpaid wages and other damages
under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, the
Colorado Wage Claim Act and the Colorado Minimum Wage Act.

Defendants operate Tequila's Family Mexican Restaurant, a chain of
Mexican restaurants located throughout Colorado. Fuentes worked
for Tequila's Family Mexican Restaurant as a waiter/bartender from
October 24, 2016 to February 22, 2017 at their Golden and Thornton
stores. Plaintiff claims to be denied overtime pay, worked off-
the-clock and did not receive his full tips. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Penn A. Dodson, Esq.
     Alexander L. Gastman, Esq.
     ANDERSON DODSON, P.C.
     11 Broadway, Suite 615
     New York, NY 10004
     Tel: (212) 961-7639
     Fax: (646) 998-8051
     Email: penn@andersondodson.com
            alex@andersondodson.com


CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING: Cooley's Bid to Certify Class Continued
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois made a docket entry on May 4, 2017, in the case entitled
Angel Cooley v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., et al., Case No.
1:17-cv-03121 (N.D. Ill.), relating to a hearing held before the
Honorable Charles P. Kocoras.

The minute entry states that the Plaintiff's motion for class
certification is entered and continued, and the Plaintiff's motion
to enter and continue motion for class certification is granted.

A copy of the Notification of Docket Entry is available at no
charge at http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=MAlABRQX


CPI SECURITY: Court Certifies Class of Security Officers
--------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit styled DONALD FOUST, on behalf of himself and all
other similarly situated individuals, the Plaintiff, v. (1) CPI
SECURITY SERVICES, INC., (2) COMPLETE PROTECTION & INVESTIGATIONS,
INC., (3) LAWRENCE E. SANDERS, and (4) CHRISTINE A. SANDERS, the
Defendants, Case No. 5:16-cv-01447-R (W.D. Okla.), the Hon. Judge
David L. Russell entered an order granting in part and denying in
part Plaintiff's motion for class certification.

The Court certified a class of:

   "all current and former Security Officers who worked more than
   forty hours during a given week for any single Defendant, or
   combination of Defendants, consisting of (1) CPI Security
   Services, Inc., (2) Complete Protection and Investigations,
   Inc., (3) Lawrence Sanders, and/or (4) Christine Sanders, at
   any time from three years before the date of mailing of this
   notice and who were not paid overtime".

The Court said, "Before sending out their proposed notice,
Plaintiffs should revise the notice to reflect this Order's
findings and submit the revised notice to Defendants for approval.
Defendants shall have five business days to review whether the
form conforms to this Order. Before bringing any objections to the
Court, the parties must first confer and attempt to resolve their
disputes. Defendants shall have 7 days from the date of this Order
to provide Plaintiff's counsel, in a usable electronic format, a
list of all names, addresses, email addresses, and telephone
numbers of putative class members. The Court will accept
Plaintiffs' stated intention to only use the telephone numbers for
the limited purpose of contacting individuals whose notice is
returned as undeliverable. After Defendants have approved the
Notice, Plaintiffs shall have 14 days to send it by mail and
email. Persons shall have 60 days from the date the Notice is sent
to opt-in. Plaintiffs may send a reminder notice by mail and/or
email 30 days before the deadline to opt-in".

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=7dZ9TJ8U


CREDIT CONTROL: Faces "Dykes" Suit in Eastern Dist. of New York
---------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Credit Control
Services, Inc.  The case is captioned as Kristin Dykes, on behalf
of herself and all others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v.
Credit Control Services, Inc., the Defendant, Case No. 2:17-cv-
03155 (E.D.N.Y., May 24, 2017).

Credit Control, doing business as Credit Collection Services,
provides business process outsourcing solutions for customers in
the United States.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.


DEBT RECOVERY: "Garcia" Hits Collection Calls from Auto-dialer
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jorge Acevedo Garcia, on behalf of himself and others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC, Defendant,
Case No. 2:17-cv-03598, (C.D. Cal., May 12, 2017), seeks unpaid
wages, overtime, liquidated damages, interest, attorneys' fees and
costs for violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Rosenthal Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act.

Defendant is a fully licensed, bonded and insured national debt
collection agency based in Syosset, New York. Defendant placed
numerous calls to Plaintiff's cellular telephone for the purpose
of attempting to collect a debt in default. Said calls were made
with an automatic telephone dialing system. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jeremy E. Branch, Esq.
      LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY LOHMAN, P.C.
      4740 Green River Road, Suite 219
      Corona, CA 92880
      Phone: (657) 363-3332
      Fax: (657) 246-1312
      Email: jeremyb@jlohman.com

             - and -

      Michael L. Greenwald, Esq.
      GREENWALD DAVIDSON RADBIL PLLC
      5550 Glades Road, Suite 500
      Boca Raton, FL 33431
      Phone: (561) 826-5477
      Fax: (561) 961-5684
      Email: mgreenwald@gdrlawfirm.com


DESARROLLADORA HOMEX: Godie Corp. Sues Over Securities Fraud
------------------------------------------------------------
Godie Corporacion, S.A., Individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Desarrolladora Homex, S.A.B. De
C.V. a/k/a Homex Development Corp., Gerardo De Nicolas Gutierrez,
and Carlos Moctezuma Velasco, Defendants, 2:17-cv-02910 (E.D.N.Y.,
May 12, 2017), seeks to recover compensable damages for violation
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Homex develops, constructs, and sells housing properties in
Mexico, offering homes for entry level, middle income and upper
income groups. The Company is incorporated in Mexico. Homex's
American Depositary Shares (ADS) were listed and publicly traded
on the New York Stock Exchange.

Their financial statements failed to disclose that between 2010
and 2013, Homex overstated its revenue by 355% or roughly $3.3
billion by reporting fictitious sales of more than 100,000 home,
says the complaint. Homex overstated the number of units it sold
by over 100,000 units or 317% of actual units sold.

On May 2, 2014, the NYSE commenced delisting proceedings of
Homex's ADSs and immediately suspended trading. On December 9,
2016, the US-based facility for Homex's ADSs was terminated.

Godie acquired Homex securities at artificially inflated prices
and lost substantially upon the revelation of the alleged
corrective disclosures. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Laurence M. Rosen, Esq.
      THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A.
      275 Madison Ave., 34th Floor
      New York, NY 10016
      Telephone: (212) 686-1060
      Fax: (212) 202-3827
      Email: lrosen@rosenlegal.com


EDGEWATER HEALTH: Pinto Seeks Unpaid Wages Under Labor Code
-----------------------------------------------------------
ZINA DELANE PINTO, as an individual and on behalf of all employees
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. EDGEWATER HEALTH CARE, INC.
dba EDGEWATER SKILLED NURSING CENTER, a Nevada corporation, and
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, the Defendant, Case No. BC662499
(Cal. Super. Ct., May 24, 2017), seeks to recover compensatory
damages, statutory penalties and attorneys' fees, and meal period
compensation under the California Labor Code.

According to the complaint, Defendant employed Plaintiff and
similarly situated persons, and due to Defendant's failure to
schedule the Putative Class in such a manner that allowed Class
Members to receive and/or take their meal and/or rest breaks,
Plaintiff and the Class were not provided and/or denied work free
meal and rest breaks. Defendant also failed to pay Class Members
wages for all hours worked, and failed to pay due and owed wages
upon ending of employment for employees within California. The
Class includes members who, due to Defendant's scheduling, were
denied meal periods and commensurate pay under California Labor
Code section 226.7, denied rest periods and commensurate pay under
Cal. Labor Code, were denied overtime as a result of working
through meal and/or rest breaks under Cal. Labor Code, and working
off the clock, and were not paid wages owed upon end of the
employment relationship as required under Cal. Labor Code.

Edgewater Skilled Nursing Center is located in Long Beach. It
offers 24-hour skilled care and rehabilitation services. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Kevin Mahoney, Esq.
          Katherine J. Odenbreit, Esq.
          Atoy H. Wilson, Esq.
          MAHONEY LAW GROUP, APC
          249 E. Ocean Boulevard, Suite 814
          Long Beach, CA 90802
          Telephone No.: (562) 590-5550
          Facsimile No.: (562) 590-8400
          E-mail: kmahonev@mahonev-law.net
                  kodenbreit@mahonev-law.net
                  awilson@mahonev-law.net


ENCORE RECEIVABLE: Beaufrand Files Placeholder Class Cert. Bid
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit captioned CARLOS BEAUFRAND, Individually and on
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, the Plaintiff, v. ENCORE
RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT, INC., the Defendant, Case No. 2:17-cv-
00721-JPS (E.D. Wisc.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an
order certifying a class, appointing the Plaintiff as its
representative, and appointing Ademi & O'Reilly, LLP as its
Counsel, and for such other and further relief as the Court may
deem appropriate.

The Plaintiff further asks the Court to stay this class
certification motion until an amended motion for class
certification is filed, and that the Court grant the parties
relief from the local rules' automatic briefing schedule and
requirement that Plaintiff file a brief and supporting documents
in support of this motion.

To avoid the risk of a defendant mooting a putative class
representative's individual stake in the litigation, the Seventh
Circuit in Damasco instructed plaintiffs to file a certification
motion with the complaint, along with a motion to stay briefing on
the certification motion until discovery could commence. Damasco
v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891 (7th Cir. 2011), overruled,
Chapman v. First Index, Inc., 796 F.3d 783, 787 (7th Cir. 2015).

As this motion to certify a class is a placeholder motion as
described in Damasco, the parties and the Court should not be
burdened with unnecessary paperwork and the resulting expense when
a one paragraph, single page motion to certify and stay should
suffice until an amended motion is filed, the Plaintiffs contend.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=a4GztYYo

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Shpetim Ademi, Esq.
          John D. Blythin, Esq.
          Mark A. Eldridge, Esq.
          Denise L. Morris, Esq.
          ADEMI & O'REILLY, LLP
          3620 East Layton Avenue
          Cudahy, WI 53110
          Telephone: (414) 482 8000
          Facsimile: (414) 482 8001
          E-mail: sademi@ademilaw.com
                  jblythin@ademilaw.com
                  meldridge@ademilaw.com
                  dmorris@ademilaw.com


FLOWERS FOODS: Martins Moves to Certify Class of Distributors
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit styled DANIEL MARTINS, on behalf of
himself and others similarly situated v. FLOWERS FOODS, INC.,
FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF BRADENTON, LLC, and FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF
VILLA RICA, LLC, Case No. 8:16-cv-03145-MSS-JSS (M.D. Fla.), seeks
an order conditionally certifying a collective of, and permitting
Court-supervised notice to:

     all Independent Distributors ("IDs") who distribute fresh
     bakery products for Defendants, Flowers Foods, Inc., Flowers
     Baking Co. of Bradenton, LLC, Flowers Baking Company of
     Villa Rica, L.L.C., and any other bakeries, affiliates or
     subsidiaries of Flowers Foods, Inc. within the state of
     Florida or Georgia.

Mr. Martins contends that Flowers misclassified its "Independent
Distributor" employees or "IDs" as independent contractors, who
were not eligible for overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Mr. Martins also asks the Court to (a) require the Defendant to
produce in an electronic or computer-readable format the full
name, address(es), phone numbers, social security numbers, e-mail
address(es), dates and warehouse/bakery locations worked for each
FLSA Collective members, and (b) authorize notice and consent to
join forms.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=loNtyIAH

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Carlos V. Leach, Esq.
          MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
          Post Office Box 4979
          Orlando, FL 32802-4979
          Telephone: (407) 420-1414
          Facsimile: (407) 245-3341
          E-mail: cleach@forthepeople.com

               - and -

          Andrew R. Frisch, Esq.
          MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
          600 N. Pine Island Road, Suite 400
          Plantation, FL 33324
          Telephone: (954) WORKERS
          Facsimile: (954) 327-3013
          E-mail: AFrisch@forthepeople.com


FRONTLINE ASSET: "Nedd" Sues Over Collection Letter
---------------------------------------------------
Wynette Nedd on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated
consumers Plaintiff, v. Frontline Asset Strategies LLC, Defendant,
Case No. 1:17-cv-02931, (E.D. Cal., May 13, 2017), seeks
preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, statutory damages,
attorney fees, litigation expenses and costs incurred and such
other relief for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act.

Defendant sought to collect from Plaintiff a consumer debt via a
collection letter. Said letter failed to include a safe harbor
statement, failed to indicate if the total amount due was accruing
and there was no disclosure that indicated otherwise, says the
complaint. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Igor Litvak, Esq.
      THE LITVAK LAW FIRM, PLLC
      1701 Avenue P Brooklyn, NY 11229
      Tel: (718) 989-2908
      Facsimile: (718) 989-2908
      E-mail: Igor@LitvakLawNY.com


GHP MANAGEMENT: Lewis Seeks Regular & OT Wages Under Labor Code
---------------------------------------------------------------
KRISTIAN LEWIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, the Plaintiff, v. GHP MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a
California Corporation, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, the Defendant,
Case No. BC622544 (Cal. Super. Ct., May 24, 2017), seeks to
recover regular and overtime wages under California Labor Codes,
and IWC Wage Orders.

The Plaintiff alleges that Defendants know, should know, knew,
and/or should have known that Plaintiff and the other Class
Members were entitled to receive accurate wages including overtime
compensation, and premium wages including but not limited to Labor
Code and applicable 1WC Wage Orders and California Code of
Regulations, but were not paid all regular
and overtime wages and not paid all meal and rest period premiums
due.

According to the complaint, the Plaintiff and the Class Members,
were not paid all wages due and owing at the time of separation
for meal and rest period premiums, wages and overtime wages for
off the clock work. Defendants also failed to pay for business
expenses incurred while under the control of Defendants. The
Defendants failed to adequately reimburse Plaintiff and Class
Members business expenditures incurred in direct consequence of
their duties pursuant to Labor Code.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          James R. Hawkins, Esq.
          Gregory Mauro, Esq.
          JAMES HAWKINS APLC
          9880 Research Drive, Suite 200
          Irvine, CA 92618
          Telephone: (949) 387 7200
          Facsimile: (949) 387 6676
          E-mail: James@jameshawkinsaplc.com
                  Greg@jameshawkinsaplc.com


HARVARD PILGRIM: "Vorpahl" Sues Over Denied Therapy
---------------------------------------------------
Jacqueline Vorpahl, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Insurance
Company, Defendant, Case No. 1:17-cv-10844, (D. Mass., May 12,
2017), seeks benefits representing those sums that Plaintiff paid
for therapy that should have been covered by Harvard Pilgrim,
disgorgement of all illegally-gained profits that should have been
used to pay for legitimate coverage claims, an order requiring
Harvard Pilgrim to cover all medically necessary treatment in the
future, any and all other relief related to this action, including
payment of reasonable fees, costs and interest under the Parity
Act and in breach of fiduciary duty.

Plaintiff's health benefits were insured by Harvard Pilgrim Health
Care Insurance Company, a non-profit company incorporated in
Massachusetts with its principal place of business located in
Wellesley, Massachusetts.

Plaintiff's son, who is covered under his mother's plan, suffers
from oppositional defiant disorder, narcissism, substance use
disorder and depression. Vorpahl sought coverage for her son's
outdoor behavioral therapy but was denied. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Patrick J. Sheehan, Esq.
      WHATLEY KALLAS, LLP
      60 State Street, 7th Floor
      Boston, MA 02109
      Telephone: (617) 573-5118
      Facsimile: (617) 371-2950
      Email: psheehan@whatleykallas.com

             - and -

      Jordan Lewis, Esq.
      JORDAN LEWIS, P.A.
      4473 N.E. 11th Avenue
      Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334
      Telephone: (954) 616-8995
      Facsimile: (954) 206-0374
      Email: jordan@jml-lawfirm.com


HEMBREE GROUP: "Stokes" Labor Suit Seeks Unpaid Overtime Wages
--------------------------------------------------------------
Barnard Stokes, on behalf of himself and others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. The Hembree Group, Inc. and Gregory
Hembree, individually, Defendants, Case No. 8:17-cv-01118 (M.D.
Fla., May 11, 2017), seeks unpaid overtime compensation,
liquidated damages, declaratory relief and reasonable attorney's
fees and costs and relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Plaintiff was employed as a painter from December 2015 through
December 2016. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Marc R. Edelman, Esq.
     MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
     201 N. Franklin Street, Suite 700
     Tampa, FL 33602
     Telephone: (813) 223-5505
     Fax: (813) 257-0572
     Email: Medelman@forthepeople.com


HIGHMARK HEALTH: Presque Isle Claims Shortchanged on Medical Bill
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Presque Isle Colon and Rectal Surgery, on behalf of itself and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Highmark Health, Highmark
Inc., Highmark Choice Company, Defendants, Case No. 1:17-cv-0122
(W.D. Pa., May 11, 2017), seeks actual, double, or treble damages,
actual and consequential damages and equitable relief, including
restitution or disgorgement, declaratory and injunctive relief
requiring Highmark to rescind reimbursement rate cuts, prejudgment
and post-judgment interest, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs
and such further relief resulting from putative antitrust, breach
of contract and unjust enrichment and unlawful attempted
anticompetitive actions in violation of the Sherman Act and
Pennsylvania Common Law.

Plaintiff is a medical practice and renders medical care to
patients covered by a Highmark-administered Affordable Care Act
healthcare plan. Highmark is a health insurer in the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania and is alleged of abusing market dominance by
subjecting independent Pennsylvania healthcare practitioners to
anticompetitive and other unlawful practices in relation to
services rendered to patients covered by a Highmark insurance
exchange product to include artificially low physician
reimbursement rates.  It also unilaterally imposed an across-the-
board 4.5% cut in the reimbursement rates it pays its affiliated
healthcare practitioners for medical services rendered to covered
patients, says the complaint. [BN]

Plaintiffs are represented by:

     Richard M. Golomb, Esq.
     Ruben Honik, Esq.
     Kenneth J. Grunfeld, Esq.
     David J. Stanoch, Esq.
     GOLOMB & HONIK, P.C.
     1515 Market Street, Suite 1100
     Philadelphia, PA 19102
     Telephone: (215) 985-9177
     Facsimile: (215) 985-4169
     Email: rgolomb@golombhonik.com
            rhonik@golombhonik.com
            kgrunfeld@golombhonik.com
            dstanoch@golombhonik.com


IBEX CONSTRUCTION: Fails to Pay Contract Balance, Suit Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as, Long Island Concrete, Inc., on behalf of
itself and others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. IBEX
Construction Company, LLC, Andras Frankl a/k/a Andrew Frankl and
"John Doe Surety Company" fictitious name, intended to denote the
surety company that issued a labor and material payment bond to
any applicable projects, Case No. 652835/2017 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., May
24, 2017), seeks to recover from IBEX the sum of $264,541.91, plus
appropriate interest.

According to the complaint, Plaintiff entered into a subcontract
agreement -- Chapin School Phase I Subcontract -- with IBEX,
whereby Plaintiff agreed to furnish certain labor, materials and
equipment to perform concrete work at the Chapin School Phase I
Project, and IBEX agreed to pay Plaintiff the lump sum and unit
prices set forth therein. During its performance of the Chapin
School Phase I Subcontract, Plaintiff performed additional and
extra work at the Chapin School Phase I Project at the special
instance and direction of IBEX. Plaintiff fully and duly performed
all of the terms and conditions to be performed under the Chapin
School Phase I Subcontract in connection with the Chapin School
Phase I Project.

The Complaint alleges that IBEX has materially breached the Chapin
School Phase I Subcontract by failing to fully and properly pay
Plaintiff for the labor, materials, work, equipment and services
furnished at the Art of Shaving Project. There remains a balance
of $264,541.91 due and owing to Plaintiff from IBEX for the labor,
materials and equipment furnished by Plaintiff at the Chapin
School Phase I Project, no part of which balance has been paid by
IBEX, although duly demanded.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Nicholas Carre, Esq.
          Diana Squillante, Esq.
          CARRE, PLLC
          Long Island Concrete, Inc.
          75 So. Broadway - 4th Floor
          White Plains, NY 10601
          Telephone: (914) 304 4266


IBM CORP: "Rader" Suit Seeks Unpaid Back and Overtime Wages
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charley Rader, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. International Business Machines
Corporation, Defendant, Case No. 5:17-cv-00209 (M.D. Fla., May 11,
2017), seeks unpaid back wages at the applicable overtime rate,
liquidated damages, prejudgment interest, all costs and attorney's
fees incurred and such further relief for violation of the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

Charley Rader was employed by the Defendant as sales transaction
support. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Christopher J. Saba, Esq.
      WENZEL FENTON CABASSA, PA
      1110 N Florida Ave., Ste. 300
      Tampa, FL 33602-3343
      Tel: (813) 224-0431
      Fax: (813) 229-8712
      Email: csaba@wfclaw.com


INTELLICALL CORP: "Naiman" Sues Over Illegally Faxed Ads
--------------------------------------------------------
Sid Naiman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. IntelliCall Corporation AKA Accurate
Answering, Medfone24.com, CareLink Communications, Ring Medical
Communications Services, Travis Vincent, Bobbi Kocher Spain, DOES
1 - 10, inclusive,, Defendant, Case No. 4:17-cv-02738, (N.D. Cal.,
May 11, 2017), seeks actual damages, statutory damages for willful
and negligent violations, costs and reasonable attorney's fees and
such other and further relief resulting from negligent violations
of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Defendants are business entities that sell and market calling
services for medical professionals and patients. Plaintiff is not
a customer of Defendant' services and has never provided any
personal information, including his telephone facsimile number, to
Defendants for any purpose whatsoever. Defendants used a fax
machine to sell or solicit their business services without prior
express consent to receive calls and did not have an opt out
option. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Todd M. Friedman, Esq.
      Adrian R. Bacon, Esq.
      Meghan E. George, Esq.
      LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
      21550 Oxnard St., Suite 780
      Woodland Hills, CA 91367
      Phone: (877) 206-4741
      Fax: 866-633-0228
      Email: tfriedman@toddflaw.com
             abacon@toddflaw.com
             mgeorge@toddflaw.com


INTERCONTINENTAL CAPITAL: "Bohlke" Suit Seeks to Certify Classes
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit titled ROBERT BOHLKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF
ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, the Plaintiff, v. INTERCONTINENTAL
CAPITAL GROUP, INC., the Defendant, Case No. 2:17-cv-01240-ODW-AFM
(C.D. Cal.), the Plaintiff will move the Court on July 10, 2017,
before the Hon. Judge Otis D. Wright II of the United States
District Court, Central District of California, for an order to
certify these classes:

   "all persons within the United States who received any
   solicitation/telemarketing telephone calls from Defendant to
   said person's cellular telephone made through the use of any
   automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or
   prerecorded voice and such person had not previously consented
   to receiving such calls within the four years prior to the
   filing of this Complaint"; and

   "all persons within the United States registered on the
   National Do-Not-Call Registry for at least 30 days, who had
   not granted Defendant prior express consent nor had a prior
   established business relationship, who received more than one
   call made by or on behalf of Defendant that promoted
   Defendant's products or services, within any twelve-month
   period, within four years prior to the filing of the
   complaint".

The Plaintiff will also move the Court for appointment of
Plaintiff as Class Representative, and for appointment of
Plaintiff's attorneys as Class Counsel.

A copy of the Notice of Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=P0zlERI9

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Todd M. Friedman, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
          21550 Oxnard St. Suite 780,
          Woodland Hills, CA 91367
          Telephone: (877) 206 4741
          Facsimile: (866) 633 0228
          E-mail: tfriedman@toddflaw.com


INTERNATIONAL BANK: "Carabalo" Suit Seeks Class Certification
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit entitled CANDY CARABALLO and other similarly
situated non-exempt Assistant Branch Managers, the Plaintiff(s),
v. INTERNATIONAL BANK FINANCE BANK, a Florida Profit Corporation,
and JOSE E. CUETO, individually, the Defendants, Case No. 1:17-cv-
21476-JJO (S.D. Fla.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to certify a
class of:

   "all individuals titled as "Assistant Branch Managers" who
   performed work for Defendant International Finance Bank during
   the time period spanning three years preceding the date the
   original Complaint in this action was filed up to, and
   including, the date this Court enters its Order on this motion
   who were not paid proper overtime compensation during any
   workweek of his or her employment".

The case is a collective action to enforce the overtime provision
of the Fair Labor Standard Act.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=Es7y9ula

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Brody M. Shulman, Esq.
          Jason S. Remer, Esq.
          REMER & GEORGE-PIERRE, PLLC
          Miami, FL 33130
          Telephone: (305) 416 5000
          Facsimile: (305) 416 5005

The Defendant is represented by:

          Brooks Anderson, Esq.
          Rodolfo Gomez, Esq.
          FORDHARRISON, LLP
          1450 Centerpark Boulevard, Suite 325
          Telephone: (561) 345 7502
          Facsimile: (561) 345 7501


INTERNET GOLD: Pelephone Still Faces Claim on Smart Call Service
----------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd.'s subsidiary, Pelephone
Communications Ltd., continues to face a financial claim related
to its Smart Call service, according to the Company's Form 20-F
filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

In May 2016, a complaint was filed against Pelephone with a motion
to certify it as a class action, alleging that Pelephone opted
subscribers to its Smart Call service without their consent or
their knowledge, and this in contravention of the provisions of
the Law and of its license and the Smart Call service portfolio.

The amount of claim is approximately NIS200 million.

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: Unit Still Defends Overseas Call Overcharges Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd.'s subsidiary, Pelephone
Communications Ltd., continues to defend itself in a legal
proceeding, with a motion to certify it as a class action,
regarding alleged overseas call overcharges, according to Internet
Gold's Form 20-F filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

In June 2016, the action was filed in the Jerusalem District Court
against Pelephone, alleging that Pelephone overcharges for calls
made from overseas to Israel in the overseas Travel track and
charges at the higher rate for a direct dialing call instead the
rate for a call via the savings service, because of the fact that
the calls were dialed using the country code for Israel, as the
phone numbers are saved in the claimant's phone.

The amount of claim is approximately NIS86 million.

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: Unit Still Defends Action on Unused Overseas Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
A subsidiary of Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. continues to
defend itself in a legal action, with a motion to certify it as a
class action, regarding its overseas package, according to the
Company's Form 20-F filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

In October 2016, a financial claim was filed in the Lod District
Court against Pelephone Communications Ltd. and its competitors
Partner and Cellcom, alleging that the defendants do not allow
their subscribers to make full use of their overseas package and
this through discriminatory terms under which the package can be
used for a very short period (between one week to one month only)
and that at the end of that period, the unused balance of the
package expires and no reimbursement is given.

"The amount of the claim is not stated, but is estimated in the
tens of millions of shekels," the Company disclosed.

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: 4 Lawsuits v. Pelephone Ended in 2016, Early 2017
----------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. disclosed four legal proceedings
with potential class status against subsidiary Pelephone
Communications Ltd. that ended in 2016 or before April 26, 2017,
which is the date of the publication of the Company's Form 20-F
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

The Company further disclosed that these legal proceedings involve
"NIS80 million or more (approximately NIS60 million of the net
profit)" and those "in which the amount claimed is not stated in
the statement of claim, except in the case of a claim which prima
facie does not reach the above amount bar (and all unless Bezeq
believes the claim has other aspects and/or implications beyond
its monetary amount)."

The Company said, "In regards to class actions, it is noted that
submission of class actions in Israel does not involve payment of
a fee deriving from the amount of the claim. Accordingly, the
amount of a claim in claims of this type may be significantly
higher than the scope of true exposure for those claims."

In February 2012, a financial claim was filed against subsidiaries
Pelephone and Bezeq - The Israel Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.,
as well as competitors Partner and Cellcom in the Jerusalem
District Court with an application to certify it as a class
action, alleging the failure to comply with the provisions of the
law with respect to people with disabilities when rendering
services.  In April 2016, the Court approved a settlement
arrangement between the parties under which the suit will be
dismissed in return for implementation of a series of
accessibility adjustments and benefits for people with
disabilities.  In addition, the group of defendants will credit
the claimants in amounts that are not material.

According to the Company, the amount of the original claim was
approximately NIS361 million "for all the defendants, without
noting an amount for each of the defendants."

In August 2012, a financial claim filed with a motion to certify
it as a class action in the Central District Court against
Pelephone, Partner and Cellcom, alleging that under the repair
services provided by the defendants for a fee (payment per repair
or a monthly fee for repair service), if a certain part in the
handset must be replaced, the defendants do not provide the
customer with the spare part, and this in contravention of the
law.  Furthermore, the defendants reuse the replaced parts when
providing repair services for other customers, thus ostensibly
enriching themselves twice.  The action also requests writs of
mandamus and declaratory relief.  In May 2016 the court approved
the settlement agreement reached between the parties, under which
the motion will be dismissed and Pelephone will implement future
changes in its conduct when receiving products for repair.

According to the Company, the amount of the original claim for
this case was approximately NIS120 million for each of the
defendants, in a total amount of NIS360 million.

In August 2015, a financial claim filed with a motion to certify
it as a class action in the Central District Court against
Pelephone, alleging that one of the communications companies made
improper use of its database in violation of the Privacy
Protection Law 1981, when it transferred or sold the customers'
particulars to the other respondents, including Pelephone.  The
claim against Pelephone revolves mainly around the purchase or
receipt of this information and its use for marketing purposes, in
a way that violates the provisions of the Communications Law
regarding the sending of spam.  In November 2016, the court
approved the claimant's withdrawal from the motion to certify a
class action and dismissed his personal claim.

"The amount of the claim is not stated, but the application is
estimated in the tens of millions of shekels," the Company said.

In November 2015, a financial claim filed with a motion to certify
it as a class action in the Central District Court against
Pelephone and two other mobile telephony companies, alleging that
the pre-paid prices of the companies are higher than the post-paid
prices, which is due to cartelization of the three companies in
this market.  In September the court dismissed the claimant's
personal claim and the motion to certify it as a class action and
ordered him to pay the expenses.  In October 2016 an appeal of the
ruling was filed.  In January 2017, the appeal was dismissed.

According to the Company, the amount of the original claim for
this case was approximately NIS2,800 million with regard to
Pelephone (and the total amount against the three companies is in
excess of NIS13,000 million)

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: Civil Class Action vs. Bezeq Still Ongoing
---------------------------------------------------------
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd.'s subsidiary, Bezeq
International Ltd., continues to defend in a civil action related
to its failure to provide the browsing speed stated in its
contract, according to the Company's Form 20-F filing with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016.

In December 2011, a civil class action was filed in the Central
District Court against Bezeq International, alleging that during
October 2011, Bezeq International failed to provide its Internet
customers with the browsing speed it had undertaken in the
contract. The plaintiffs seek the refund of the monthly fees and
compensation for mental anguish.

On March 13, 2016, the court certified the claim as a class
action.

According to the Company, the amount of the claim is approximately
NIS120 million.

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: Moreshet Content Filtering Service Suit Ongoing
--------------------------------------------------------------
A subsidiary of Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. still defends in
a legal action related to its Moreshet content filtering services,
the Company's Form 20-F filing with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

In January 2015, a financial claim was filed with a motion to
certify it as a class action in the Central District Court against
Bezeq International Ltd., alleging that the Moreshet content
filtering services that Bezeq International provides for its
religious and traditional sector customers, for a fee, do not
protect users from offensive content and that their exposure to
such content caused them harm.  It is further claimed that Bezeq
International must compensate the customers who purchased content
filtering services and who were not offered the basic filtering
service which is provided free of charge.

According to the Company, the amount of the claim is about NIS65
million, with the addition of NIS1,000 million for each of the
members of the class (every pupil in the Israeli education
system).

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: Bezeq Int'l Still Defends Overseas Call Lawsuits
---------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd.'s Bezeq International Ltd.
continues to defend itself in legal proceedings related to its
overseas dialing plan and outgoing international call rates,
according to the Company's Form 20-F filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016.

In November 2015, a financial claim was filed with a motion to
certify it as a class action in the Central District Court against
Bezeq International, alleging that Bezeq International charged
customers for an overseas dialing plan at "premium prices" that
were higher than the agreed price fixed in the communications
plan.  The plaintiffs contend that Bezeq International exceeded
the applicability of the plan, fixed line destinations overseas
and defined them as "premium destinations", without basis and by
misleading customers.

In September 2016, another financial claim with a motion to
certify it as a class action was filed in the Central District
Court against Bezeq International, alleging that Bezeq
International charges excessive and unreasonable rates in
contravention of section 17 of the Communications Law, for
outgoing international calls.

The Company has not noted the amount of claims in both cases.

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: Bezeq Int'l Defends Suit on Misleading 100MB Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd.'s subsidiary, Bezeq
International Ltd., still defends itself in a legal action
regarding its 100MB Internet packages, according to the Company's
Form 20-F filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

In June 2016, a financial claim with a motion to certify it as a
class action was filed against Bezeq International in the
Jerusalem District Court, alleging Bezeq International misleads
its customers by marketing fast Internet packages at 100MB, while
the actual speed provided is much lower.

The amount of the claim is approximately NIS187 million.

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: Phone Card Lawsuits vs. Bezeq Int'l Ended in 2016
----------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. disclosed in its Form 20-F
filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 that a civil class action and
a financial claim with a request for class status, both filed
against subsidiary Bezeq International Ltd. regarding its
international phone cards, had ended in 2016.

In 2008, four claims were filed and were consolidated into one
civil class action in the Central District Court against Bezeq
International and other international operators relating to the
use of international phone cards for dialing to destinations in
the Philippines, Thailand and Nepal.

The claimants allege that the phone cards provide an average of
50% of the time units indicated to the purchasers of the cards.
They also allege that Bezeq International deducts call time for
time unsuccessfully spent attempting to call someone, does not
charge for units of round minutes, provides misleading information
about the number of units on the card and formed a cartel with
other international telecommunication companies to raise the
prices for phone cards.  In November 2010, the court recognized
the motion to certify a class action on the grounds of deception.

In September 2016, a judgment was handed approving the settlement
arrangement, under which Bezeq International will allow calls in
the amount of NIS 5 million to be made free of charge, and will
pay the representative plaintiffs compensation and legal fees in
an amount of NIS 500,000.

The amount of the claim for this case was NIS1,159 million.

In a separate case, in February 2012, a financial claim with a
motion to certify it as a class action was filed in the Tel Aviv
District Court. The allegations were similar to the action above.
The foregoing settlement mentioned above also applies to this
claim.

The Company noted that the amount of the claim for this case was
NIS2,700 million.

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: Apartment Residents Lawsuit vs. DBS Still Ongoing
----------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd.'s subsidiary, DBS Satellite
Services (1998) Ltd., continues to face a legal proceeding
regarding electricity consumption in apartment buildings,
according to the Company's Form 20-F filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016.

In June 2014, a financial claim was filed with a motion to certify
it as a class action in the Tel Aviv District Court against the
subsidiary, alleging that DBS unlawfully charged residents in
apartment buildings (subscribers and non-subscribers of DBS) for
the electricity consumption for the satellite dishes and/or
amplifiers and/or other devices that DBS uses, that are located in
these apartment buildings.  The applicant has petitioned the
court, among other things, to order DBS to refund the amount
collected for electricity consumption.

The second lawsuit (that was originally filed with the District
Court in Haifa, and was moved for hearing before the Tel Aviv
District Court in September 2014) includes a claim that DBS
installed equipment in apartment buildings that operate on
electricity and according to their claim, DBS connected the
outside equipment without approval and consent of the apartment
buildings to the communal electricity and also consumed
electricity without paying for it.

In October 2015, the court ruled to consolidate the proceedings in
both motions for certification and filing of consolidated
statements.  In December 2016, the claimants' request for
interlocutory remedies against DBS regarding the disconnection of
subscribers who refuse to bear the electricity costs and the
signing of intermediate representatives on agreements to bear
these expenses was struck.

The amount of claim is NIS80 million for monetary and non-monetary
damages allegedly caused due to the electricity consumption for
DBS systems and an injunction ordering DBS to install electricity
meters for measuring the electricity consumption of DBS's systems.

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: Suit vs. DBS on Electronic Advertisements Ongoing
----------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd.'s subsidiary, DBS Satellite
Services (1998) Ltd., remains a defendant in a legal proceeding,
with a motion to certify it as a class action, regarding its
electronic advertisements, according to the Company's Form 20-F
filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

In September 2014, a financial claim filed against DBS in the Tel
Aviv District Court, alleging that electronic advertisements sent
by DBS to its customers were in contravention of Section 30A of
the Communications Law, in breach of DBS's license and in breach
of the agreement between DBS and its customers.  The applicants
petitioned the court for relief for the inconvenience caused to
the customers by DBS, harassment, loss of time, etc. and sought
relief in an amount to be determined in the court's discretion.

The amount of the claim is NIS402 million (with additional relief
to be determined at the court's discretion).

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: Unit Still Faces Customer Discrimination Lawsuit
---------------------------------------------------------------
A subsidiary of Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. continues to
defend itself in legal proceedings regarding alleged customer
discrimination in terms of pricing and benefits, among others,
according to the Company's Form 20-F filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016.

In July 2015, an action was filed with a motion to certify it as a
class action against DBS Satellite Services (1998) Ltd. in the
Central District Court, alleging discrimination against DBS
customers who are not offered or given the best terms or the
lowest price for the services they received from DBS.  The
plaintiffs assert a claim of discrimination against new DBS
customers over existing customers who are eligible for receiving a
campaign or benefit for joining DBS and a claim of discrimination
of new members who are acquainted with the company's employees,
over other new members.

According to the allegations, these actions are contrary to DBS's
obligation under its license and by law to refrain from
discriminating with regard to the price for the services it
provides.  The applicant requests that DBS will compensate members
of the group for the monetary difference between the prices that
each of them actually paid to DBS for the services, and the lowest
price they could have paid for those services.  In addition, the
applicant requests that the court order DBS to offer and provide
its services to everyone requesting its services on the same terms
and to publish them in its various publications.

In September 2015, following the filing of another motion to
certify a class action against DBS alleging price discrimination,
the court held that the two actions will be defined as related
cases and in November 2015 the court ordered the consolidation of
the two motions to certify.

The Company said, "The applicant does not specify the amount of
the claim, but the extent of the damage is estimated to be tens of
millions of shekel.

"The amount of the second claim is estimated by the applicants to
be NIS13 million plus monetary damages as will be awarded by the
Court,

"With the consent of the parties the court decided that, in view
of the fact that a stay order was handed in the hearing of
parallel cases against different defendants raising similar legal
and factual questions by the court hearing them and in view of the
fact that there is a pending motion to transfer the hearing on
these petitions to the foregoing other court, the proceedings
concerning the motions to certify were suspended until a decision
is issued."

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: VOD Premium Content Suit vs. DBS Still Ongoing
-------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd.'s subsidiary, DBS Satellite
Services (1998) Ltd., continues to defend itself against a
financial claim with a motion to certify it as a class action
related to premium content in its VOD service, according to
Company's Form 20-F filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

In December 2015, an action was filed against DBS in the Central
District Court, alleging that DBS and its competitor, HOT, operate
illegally by providing their customers with premium content
services, (as part of the VOD service of DBS), that is provided
under transactions for fixed periods and automatically renewable,
while charging their customers for the service unilaterally,
without the clients' consent and in violation of the law.  Thus,
allegedly, they charge their customers illegal amounts while
enriching themselves unjustly.

The Company said, "The applicants do not explicitly mention the
amount of the claim, but believe that the conduct described
provides DBS and HOT annual income of tens of millions of
shekels."

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: Suit on Subscription Freezing Agreement Continues
----------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd.'s subsidiary, DBS Satellite
Services (1998) Ltd., still defends itself in a legal proceeding
related to its agreement with customers on freezing subscriptions,
according to the Company's Form 20-F filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016.

In April 2016, a financial claim with a motion to certify it as a
class action was filed against DBS in the Tel Aviv District Court,
alleging that the condition included in the agreement between DBS
and its customers, which allows a subscription to be placed on
hold for a limited period thus avoiding the payment of a
subscription fee for the period, and provided that the suspension
is for a period of at least 30 days is a discriminatory condition
and is unreasonable in a standard contract.

The claimants also contend that DBS allows customers to have their
subscription frozen for shorter periods if they make the request
by phone - which the plaintiffs argue misleads consumers, is
unfair conduct and is in breach of the provisions of the Contracts
Law, the consumer protection laws and Unjust Enrichment Law.

The claimants have asked the court to order the cancellation of
the Condition of the agreement and alternatively to determine that
DBS's conduct as described above is misleading and not in good
faith.  The court was also petitioned to instruct DBS to
compensate the subscribers who are members of the group in the
total amount of NIS736 million.

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: Class Suit vs. DBS on Children's Channel Underway
----------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd.'s subsidiary, DBS Satellite
Services (1998) Ltd., is facing a financial claim filed in March
2017 with a motion to certify it as a class action regarding the
discontinued broadcast of the Children's Channel, according to the
Company's Form 20-F filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

In an action filed in the Central District Court, the claimant
alleged that DBS was in breach of the agreement with its customers
and the conditions of the license issued by the Ministry of
Communications when it discontinued broadcasts of the Children's
Channel from January 1, 2017 and instead started to broadcast a
channel called Yes KIDZ, which the claimant alleges is not an
appropriate substitute.

The claimant is seeking a refund from DBS to each member of the
class group in the amounts it collected or overcharged (not less
than NIS100 per month) from the date of discontinuation of the
channel broadcasts, and that DBS should also compensate all
members of the group for the inconvenience caused as a result of
discontinuation of the channel broadcasts (a loss which is
estimated in the amount of NIS250 for each group member).

The Company said, "The claimant does not expressly mention the
amount sought from DBS, but defines the group as all DBS customers
on the date of discontinuation of the channel broadcasts,
excluding those customers who have ostensibly already received
specific compensation from DBS for discontinuation of the channel
broadcasts."

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary.


INTERNET GOLD: DBS Settles Lawsuit on Channel 5+ Disconnection
--------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. disclosed in its Form 20-F
filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 that a legal action, which was
filed in March 2013 with a motion to certify it as a class action
against subsidiary DBS Satellite Services (1998) Ltd. relating to
customers disconnected from channel 5+, has been resolved through
a settlement agreement.

The Company stated, "In an action filed in the Central District
Court the claimants alleged that DBS disconnected customers from
channel 5+ and reconnected them only after the customers contacted
DBS and requested reconnection but continued collecting fees for
the channel from those customers who did not contact them and
were, therefore, not reconnected.  Pursuant to an amended
settlement agreement, DBS will grant each of the members of the
group benefits of NIS14 million.

"The applicant estimates the damage to himself at NIS1,065 of
which NIS 1,000 is non-monetary damage, but did not include a
total amount for the suit."

Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. provides various
telecommunications services in Israel.  It operates through Fixed
Line Domestic Communications; Cellular Communications;
International Communications, Internet Services and Network End
Point; and Multichannel Television segments.  The Company was
founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel.
Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. is a subsidiary of Eurocom
Communications Ltd.  B Communications Ltd. is the Company's
principal subsidiary


INTRA-CELLULAR: "Yoo" Hits Share Price Drop Over Drug Safety
------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Yoo, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc., Sharon
Mates, Lawrence J. Hineline and Kimberly E. Vanover, Defendants,
Case 1:17-cv-02928 (E.D. N.Y., May 12, 2017) seeks damages
sustained, prejudgment and post-judgment interest, as well as
their reasonable attorneys' fees, expert fees and other costs and
such other and further relief under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

Intra-Cellular is a biopharmaceutical company that is focused on
the discovery and clinical development of innovative, small
molecule drugs that address underserved medical needs in
neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders by targeting
intracellular signaling mechanisms within the central nervous
system. The company's lead drug candidate, ITI-007 also known as
lumateperone, is supposed to treat schizophrenia, behavioral
disturbances in dementia, bipolar disorder and other
neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders.

Defendants failed to disclose that the findings related to
toxicity observed in animals treated with lumateperone posed an
additional safety concern. On this news, shares of Intra-Cellular
fell $3.33 per share or over 24% from its previous closing price
to close at $10.49 per share on May 1, 2017, damaging investors
including the Plaintiff. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Phillip Kim, Esq.
      Laurence M. Rosen, Esq.
      THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A.
      275 Madison Ave., 34th Floor
      New York, NY 10016
      Telephone: (212) 686-1060
      Fax: (212) 202-3827
      Email: lrosen@rosenlegal.com
             pkim@rosenlegal.com


KANG REGENCY: Faces "Mares" Suit in Southern Dist. of New York
--------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Kang Regency Corp.
The case is captioned as Javier Pedraza Mares, individually and on
behalf of others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Kang
Regency Corp., doing business as: Regency Cleaners; Regency
Cleaners Inc., doing business as: Regency Cleaners; Hongpin Kang;
and John Doe, the Defendant, Case No. 1:17-cv-03882 (S.D.N.Y., May
23, 2017).

Regency Cleaners provides professional dry Cleaning and laundromat
services.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.


KOHL'S CORP: Court Denies ERC's Bid to Certify Class Under ADA
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Ronald A. Guzman denied the Plaintiffs' motion for class
certification in the lawsuit entitled Equal Rights Center, et al.
v. Kohl's Corporation and Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., Case No.
1:14-cv-08259 (N.D. Ill.).

The Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and a putative class, seek
to hold Kohl's liable for purported violations of the
Americans with Disabilities Act and the New York Human Rights Law
based on alleged inaccessible counters, restrooms, fitting rooms,
and inadequate accessible parking.  The Plaintiffs contend that
"Kohl's systematically denies customers who use wheelchairs and
scooters full and equal enjoyment of their stores across the
country."

The Plaintiffs propose this class definition:

     All people with mobility disabilities who relied on wheeled
     mobility devices for mobility who, during the 12 months
     immediately prior to the filing of the Complaint in this
     case, were denied access to the goods, services, facilities,
     privileges, advantages, or accommodations of any Kohl's
     Department Store in the United States on the basis of
     disability because of the existence of aisles which were too
     narrow (less than 36 inches).

In a memorandum opinion and order, Judge Guzman opined that
because the Plaintiffs have not demonstrated that a nationwide
class under the proposed definition meets all of the requirements
of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or is the
appropriate vehicle for obtaining relief, the Court denies the
motion for class certification.

A copy of the Memorandum Opinion and Order is available at no
charge at http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=73F31WtF


LEAP ACADEMY: "Federico" Sues Over Termination of Employment
------------------------------------------------------------
LISA FEDERICO, the Plaintiff, v. LEAP ACADEMY UNIVERSITY CHARTER
SCHOOL, INC., and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10, the Defendants, Case No.
L-2132-17 (N.J. Super. Ct., May 24, 2017), seeks to recover
compensatory damages, punitive damages, interest, cost of suit,
attorneys' fees, enhanced attorneys' fees, equitable back pay,
equitable front pay, equitable reinstatement, and any other relief
the Court deems equitable and just under Conscientious Employee
Protection Act (CEPA).

According to the complaint, Plaintiff told Veguilla that she
needed another instructional assistant (IA) due to the violence of
the students. Plaintiff also told Veguilla during this meeting
that the student's actions were a threat to the health of other
students, and to herself. To plaintiffs knowledge, Veguilla did
not take any action to stop the violent acts of the students.

Instead, during that meeting, Veguilla told plaintiff that she was
going to be placed on a "support plan." The support plan stated
that plaintiff would be placed on an instructional plan from
February 14, 2017 to April 22, 2017. However, approximately one
week after that letter, on or around February 22, 2017, plaintiff
was notified by defendant's Chief Operations Officer, Manuel
Delgado, that she was being terminated. Plaintiff was told that
her last day of work was February 22, but because of her
employment contract, her termination became "effective" on April
21.  When plaintiff asked Delgado why she was being terminated,
Delgado stated that the termination was based on "instructional
performance." Delgado, however, never explained specifically what
that meant, or gave plaintiff any specific reason why she was
terminated from her employment.

Plaintiff complained to members of upper management at defendant
that she reasonably believed that the actions of the students and
physically attacking one another, teachers, and destroying
property of the school district were a violation of a law, a rule
or regulation promulgated pursuant to law or actions incompatible
to clear mandate of public policy. In acting as she did, plaintiff
objected to and refused to participate in activities, policies,
and practices which she reasonably believed were in violation of a
law, a rule or regulation promulgated pursuant to law or actions
incompatible with a clear mandate of public policy. Subsequent to
plaintiff engaging in this protected activity by making these
complaints, objecting to these actions and refusing to participate
in these activities, she was subjected to retaliation that
included being written up, and terminated from her employment.

A determinative or motivating factor in the relation plaintiff was
subjected to was the fact that she objected to or refused to
participate in activities, policies and practices which she
reasonably believed were in violation of a law, a rule or
regulation promulgated pursuant to law or acts incompatible with a
clear mandate of public policy. Defendant's actions and
retaliation were intentional, purposeful, willful and egregious
retaliation, performed by members of upper management, making
punitive damages warranted.

The fact that plaintiff was directly retaliated against as a
result of having engaged in protected activity under CEPA by way
of her objections entitle her to claim compensatory and punitive
damages under CEPA set forth hereafter.[BN]

The Plaintiff requests that the Court order the defendants to
cease and desist all conduct inconsistent with the claims made
going forward, both as to the specific plaintiff and as to all
other individuals similarly situated.

LEAP Academy is a public charter school that serves students in
Kindergarten through twelfth grades from Camden, in Camden County,
New Jersey, United States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Kevin M. Costello, Esq.
          COSTELLO & MAINS, LLC
          18000 Horizon Way, Suite 800
          Mount Laurel, NJ 08054
          Telephone: (856) 727 9700


LOS ANGELES, CA: Court Certified 6th and Hope Damages Subclass
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit styled Charmaine Chua, et al., the Plaintiffs v.
City of Los Angeles, et al., the Defendants, Case No. 2:16-cv-
00237-JAK-GJS (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge John A. Kronstadt
entered an order certifying the "6th and Hope" damages subclass
and denying the Beverly and Alvarado damages subclass and the
injunctive relief subclass.  The Plaintiffs are Charmaine Chua,
Torie Rivera, Lydia Hicks, Kyle Todd and the National Lawyers
Guild.

The 6th and Hope damages subclass is certified as to the demand
for statutory damages, but not as to the claim for either general
of specific damages. The Beverly and Alvarado damages subclass is
not certified, without prejudice to the filing of an amended
complaint that proposes another person to serve in the role of
class representative. The injunctive relief subclass is not
certified, without prejudice to a later request for certification
of a more narrowly defined class.

The 6th and Hope subclass is defined as:

   "approximately 130 persons who were detained and arrested at
   6th and Hope Streets on November 26, 2014, denied release on
   their own recognizance but never prosecuted. This putative
   subclass is to be represented by Chua, Hicks and Rivera. Id.
   section 60".

The Beverly and Alvarado subclass is defined as:

   "approximately 40 persons who were kettled, detained,
   interrogated and forced to give up personal information at
   Beverly and Alvarado Streets on November 28, 2014. Id.
   sections 10, 60. This subclass is represented by named
   Plaintiff Todd. Id".

The injunctive relief class is defined as:

   "all persons who have in the past, or may in the future,
   participate in, or be present at, demonstrations within the
   City of Los Angeles in the exercise of their rights of free
   Speech and petition." Id. section 61. This class is
   represented by the NLG and all the other named
   representatives".

The Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated their rights under
the First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution,
as well as their rights under the California Constitution
and Cal. Civ. Code sections 52.1 and 1798.14. The alleged basis
for these claims is that, while involved in two protests in
November 2014, Plaintiffs were detained and then arrested by
officers of the LAPD.

The Court noted that, "Plaintiffs contend that the NLG has
standing because it has suffered an injury as have its members.
Plaintiffs argue that the Complaint adequately alleges that NLG
has been injured due to the frustration of its mission by the
actions of Defendants. They argue that the NLG's mission is
"work[ing] to ensure legal and practical access to demonstrations
in Southern California" and "advocat[ing] against unlawful
surveillance of persons engaged in protected First Amendment
activity, including the compilation of databases of participants
in public protest" has been frustrated by the alleged actions
Defendant has taken against protestors in this case. Plaintiffs
contend that the allegations with respect to the violations of the
rights of protestors to assembly and the unlawful surveillance
satisfy the mission frustration prong of the analysis. See, e.g.,
Smith v. Pac. Properties & Dev. Corp., 358 F.3d 1097, 1105 (9th
Cir. 2004) ("Any violation of the [Fair Housing Act] would
therefore constitute a 'frustration of [the plaintiff's]
mission,'" where the plaintiff was "organized with the principal
purpose of helping to eliminate discrimination against individuals
with disabilities by ensuring compliance with laws intended to
provide access to housing, public buildings, transportation, goods
and services."). Plaintiffs also contend that a substantial amount
of NLG resources have been consumed due to the need to respond to
Defendants' actions. Thus, they argue that the NLG "expends money
conducting work to protect the right to lawfully demonstrate
without police interference in Los Angeles." This alleged
diversion of resources is also sufficient to establish standing.
See, e.g., Smith, 358 F.3d at 1105 (diversion of resources
satisfied when organization's resources were used "to promote
awareness of -- and compliance with -- federal and state
accessibility laws"); El Rescate Legal Servs., Inc. v. Exec.
Office of Immigration Review, 959 F.2d 742, 748 (9th Cir. 1991)
("The allegation that the [Defendant]'s policy frustrates these
goals and requires the organizations to expend resources in
representing clients they otherwise would spend in other ways is
enough to establish standing.")".

A copy of the Order vis available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=fdKD1vaN


LOS ANGELES, CA: Wins Judgment on Pleadings in "Yagman" Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. John A. Kronstadt granted with prejudice the Defendants'
motion for judgment on the pleadings in the lawsuit captioned
Stephen Yagman v. Eric Garcetti, et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-05944-
JAK-E (C.D Cal.).

Eric Michael Garcetti is the current mayor of Los Angeles.

Stephen Yagman brought the putative class action on behalf of
himself and others similarly situated.  The complaint names as
defendants these government officials: Eric Garcetti, Gilbert
Cedillo, Paul Krekorian, Bob Blumenfield, Tom Labonge, Paul
Koretz, Nury Martinez, Felipe Fuentes, Bernard Parks, Curren
Price, Jr., Herb Wesson, Jr., Mike Bonin, Mitchell Englander,
Mitch O'Farrell, Jose Huizar, Joe Suscanio, George E. Moss, Grace
Eunkyung Yoo, Rob Carpenter, David Malcolm Carson, Jaime Jesus
Rodriguez, Stephanie Rodriguez, Dana Matthew Perlman, Janny H.
Kim, John Ly, Eric Eishenberg, Bryan Kang, Jaime de la Vega,
Selwyn Hollins, Detrich Allen, Robert Andalon, Greg Savelli, John
Ficke, Sharon I. Jacobucci and Rodriguez 2949.

Through this action (the Plaintiff's third complaint), the
Plaintiff seeks to challenge the constitutionality of the
administrative procedure for contesting parking tickets that was
previously adopted by the City of Los Angeles's.  The Plaintiff
filed the Complaint in the present action on August 9, 2016,
stating that the Plaintiff received parking tickets and contested
each of these tickets.  The Plaintiff alleges that the process for
doing so was contrary to due process and California law for two
principal reasons -- the initial review of the citation was
processed by a third-party agency engaged by the City, and the
Plaintiff was required to pay the fine associated with each
citation as a condition to having an administrative hearing.

According to the civil minutes, the District Court entered a final
judgment in Yagman I pursuant to which all of Plaintiff's claims
were dismissed with prejudice and the Ninth Circuit affirmed that
judgment.  The District Court also entered a final judgment in
Yagman II pursuant to which all of Plaintiff's claims were
dismissed with prejudice.  In light of this procedural and
substantive history, Yagman I and Yagman II each has preclusive
effect, Judge Kronstadt opined.

Hence, Judge Kronstadt ruled, the motion to certify class is moot.
Judge Kronstadt also directed the Defendants to lodge a proposed
judgment after conferring with the Plaintiff to seek to agree on
its form.  The notice will include whether the parties agree to
the form of judgment or whether the Plaintiff will be filing any
objections to the proposed judgment.

A copy of the Civil Minutes is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=wLaKdncy


LTD FINANCIAL: Bordeaux Moves for Class Cert.; Hearing on June 5
----------------------------------------------------------------
Roberta Bordeaux asks the Court for an order certifying the case
styled ROBERTA BORDEAUX, on behalf of herself and those similarly
situated v. LTD FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, LP; ADVANTAGE ASSETS II, INC.;
and JOHN DOES 1 to 10, Case No. 2:16-cv-00243-KSH-CLW (D.N.J.), to
proceed as a class action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure.

The Court will commence a hearing on June 5, 2017, at 10:00 a.m.,
to consider the Motion.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=Ox21eKLk

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Philip D. Stern, Esq.
          Andrew T. Thomasson, Esq.
          STERN THOMASSON LLP
          150 Morris Avenue, 2nd Floor
          Springfield, NJ 07081-1315
          Telephone: (973) 379-7500
          Facsimile: (973) 532-5868
          E-mail: philip@sternthomasson.com
                  andrew@sternthomasson.com

               - and -

          Yongmoon Kim, Esq.
          KIM LAW FIRM LLC
          411 Hackensack Avenue, Suite 200
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Telephone: (201) 273-7117
          E-mail: ykim@kimlf.com


LVNV FUNDING: Judge Certifies Settlement Class in "Sandoval" Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit styled GEORGINA SANDOVAL, on behalf of herself and
those similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. LVNV FUNDING LLC and
RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P., the Defendants, Case No. 2:15-
cv-06728-KM-MAH (D.N.J.), the Hon. Judge Kevin McNulty certifies a
settlement class of:

"all consumers residing within the State of New Jersey, to
whom Resurgent Capital Services, L.P., mailed a collection letter
in the same or similar form as the September 8, 2014 letter sent
to Plaintiff; which letter (i) was dated within one year prior to
September 8, 2015, (ii) was seeking to collect a consumer debt
allegedly owed to LVNV Funding LLC, which originated from Credit
One Bank, N.A., and (iii) was sent in a windowed envelope such
that the account number associated with the debt was visible from
outside the envelope".

In accordance with the terms of the Agreement, Defendants shall
make the following payments:

   (a) Defendants shall create a class settlement fund of
       $75,000.00, which the Settlement Administrator will
       distribute pro rata among those Class Members who returned
       a claim form and did not exclude themselves from the
       Settlement. Claimants will receive a pro rata share of the
       Class Recovery by check. Checks issued to Claimants will
       be void 60 days from the date of issuance. Any checks that
       have not been cashed by the void date, along with any
       unclaimed funds remaining in the Class Recovery, will be
       donated as a cy pres award to Northeast New Jersey Legal
       Services, Inc. Defendants shall also issue a 5% credit to
       each open LVNV accounts for each Class Member or, in the
       alternative, if the account(s) is closed, shall issue that
       Class Member an additional $50.00 payment ("Account
       Credits"). Defendants shall not issue any Claimant a 1099C
       with respect to the Account Credits.

   (b) Defendants shall pay Plaintiff $3,500.00.

   (c) Defendants shall pay Class Counsel $30,000.00 for their
       attorneys' fees and costs incurred in the action. Class
       Counsel shall not request additional fees or costs from
       Defendants or Class Members.

Heffler Claims Group serves as the third-party settlement
administrator.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=h7vcbwNE


MANAGEMENT NETWORK: "Smith" Sues Over Foreclosure
-------------------------------------------------
Leia Smith, individually and on behalf of others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Management Network U.S.A., Inc.,
Defendant, Case No. 3:17-cv-00300, (W.D. Ky., May 11, 2017), seeks
damages and equitable relief pursuant to the Kentucky Consumer
Protection Act.

In 2014, Ms. Smith obtained a mortgage loan to purchase a home in
Taylorsville, Kentucky. In 2016, Ms. Smith experienced financial
hardship and Management Network contacted Ms. Smith and offered to
provide her with loan modification and foreclosure prevention
services. In reliance on the representations made by Management
Network, Ms. Smith submitted four payments totaling $3,525.56 to
Management Network from June 2016 to September 2016. She never
received notice from Management Network informing her of any
default or any notice to foreclose and accelerate any alleged
indebtedness. Despite making the payments to Management Network,
her original loan provider initiated foreclosure proceedings
against Ms. Smith on October 31, 2016. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      James Craig, Esq.
      Whitney L. Railey, Esq.
      CRAIG HENRY PLC
      239 South Fifth Street, Suite 1400
      Louisville, KY 40202
      Telephone: (502) 614-5962
      Facsimile: (502) 614-5968
      Email: jcraig@craighenrylaw.com
             wrailey@craighenrylaw.com


MARBLECAST OF MICHIGAN: Bid to Certify Sought in "Garner" Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit styled GARNER PROPERTIES &
MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company,
individually and as the representative of a class of similarly-
situated persons v. MARBLECAST OF MICHIGAN, INC., and AMERICAN
WOODMARK CORPORATION, Case No. 2:17-cv-11439-VAR-MKM (E.D. Mich.),
moves for entry of an order certifying this class:

     Each person sent one or more telephone facsimile messages
     from about Waypoint Cabinetry available at
     www.waypointlivingspaces.com.

The case involves common fact questions about the Defendants' fax
campaign and common legal questions under the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act.

Garner tells the Court that it files the Motion soon after the
filing of its class action complaint in order to avoid an attempt
by the Defendants to moot its individual claims in the class
action.  However, in this case, additional discovery is necessary
for the Court to determine whether to certify the class it seeks
to represent, Garner asserts.  As a result, Garner says it will
seek leave to pursue class discovery as soon as practicable.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=fN5XKCTU

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Phillip A. Bock, Esq.
          Robert M. Hatch, Esq.
          BOCK, HATCH, LEWIS & OPPENHEIM, LLC
          134 N. La Salle St., Suite 1000
          Chicago, IL 60602
          Telephone: (312) 658-5500
          Facsimile: (312) 658-5555
          E-mail: phil@classlawyers.com
                  robert@classlawyers.com

               - and -

          Aaron D. Cox, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICES OF AARON D. COX, PLLC
          23380 Goddard Rd.
          Taylor, MI 48180
          Telephone: (734) 287-3664
          E-mail: Aaron@aaroncoxlaw.com

               - and -

          Mark K. Wasvary, Esq.
          MARK K. WASVARY, P.C.
          2401 W. Big Beaver Rd., Suite 100
          Troy, MI 48084
          Telephone: (248) 649-5667
          Facsimile: (248) 649-5668
          E-mail: markwasvary@hotmail.com


MIAMI AUTO MAX: "Vasconcelo" Seeks to Recover Minimum Wages
-----------------------------------------------------------
Roberto Vasconcelo, individually and on behalf of others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Miami Auto Max, Inc. and Kennya Quesada,
individually, Defendants, Case No. 1:17-cv-21765, (S.D. Fla., May
12, 2017), seeks payment of minimum wages, liquidated damages, an
award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs and any and all such
other relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Vasconcelo works as automobile salesperson at a conglomerate of
automobile dealership locations known as "Car Depot of Miami" and
"Car Depot of Miramar" in Miami-Dade County, Florida and Broward
County, Florida, owned and/or operated and controlled by Miami
Auto Max, Inc. Employees worked under a "commissions-only" pay
plan in place at both dealerships. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

Anthony F. Sanchez, Esq.
      ANTHONY F. SANCHEZ, P.A.
      6701 Sunset Drive, Suite 101
      Miami, FL 33143
      Tel: (305) 665-9211
      Fax: (305) 328-4842
      E-mail: afs@laborlawfla.com


MILK RIVER: Faces "Jones" Suit in Eastern Dist. of New York
-----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Milk River Cafe,
LLC. The case is styled as Dante Jones, individually and in behalf
of all other persons similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Milk
River Cafe, LLC, doing business as: Milk River Cafe, jointly and
severally; Bruce Lyew, jointly and severally; and La-Niece Lyew,
jointly and severally, the Defendant, Case No. 1:17-cv-03120
(E.D.N.Y., May 23, 2017).

Milk River is a restaurant and lounge located in Brooklyn.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.


MMODAL SERVICES: "Seijas" Seeks OT Pay for Off-the-Clock Work
--------------------------------------------------------------
Michelle Seijas f/k/a Michelle Cram, on behalf of herself and
others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. MModal Services, Ltd.,
Inc., Defendant, Case 8:17-cv-01116 (M.D. Fla., May 11, 2017)
seeks unpaid minimum wages, liquidated damages and declaratory
relief pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act and Florida's
State Minimum Wage Law.

Defendant is a medical transcription company where Plaintiff was
employed as medical transcriptionists and was paid per line edited
or transcribed. Seijas was paid only for hands-on time and was not
compensated for computer down-time, waiting time, retrieving the
patient's medical record number and other non-transcribing-related
work. She also claims excessive deductions from "blank" entries
from inaudible/incoherent recordings. [BN]

Plaintiffs are represented by:

      Jay P. Lechner, Esq.
      Jason M. Melton, Esq.
      WHITTEL & MELTON, LLC
      One Progress Plaza
      200 Central Avenue, #400
      St. Petersburg, FL 33701
      Telephone: (727) 822-1111
      Facsimile: (727) 898-2001
      Email: Pleadings@theFLlawfirm.com
             lechnerj@theFLlawfirm.com
             kmoran@theFLlawfirm.com


MONTGOMERY, AL: Carter Moves for Class Certification
----------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff moves the Court to certify the action entitled
ALDARESS CARTER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND FOR A CLASS OF SIMILARLY
SITUATED PERSONS OR ENTITIES v. THE CITY OF MONTGOMERY and BRANCH
D. KLOESS; JUDICIAL CORRECTION SERVICES, INC., a corporation;
CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE COMPANIES, INC., a corporation; CHC
COMPANIES, INC., a corporation, Case No. 2:15-cv-00555-RCL-WC
(M.D. Ala.), as a class action on behalf of a class composed of:

     All individuals who have been in the past assigned by the
     Montgomery Municipal Court to "probation" with Judicial
     Correction Services (JCS) for the collection of fines, and

     All individuals who, despite their indigency, were
     incarcerated, without consideration of their indigency for
     failure to pay fines, charges and fees to Montgomery.

The Plaintiff also asks the Court to appoint the Plaintiff's
counsel as Class Counsel.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=WEAuysEn

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          G. Daniel Evans, Esq.
          Alexandria Parrish, Esq.
          Maurine C. Evans, Esq.
          THE EVANS LAW FIRM, P.C.
          1736 Oxmoor Road, Suite 101
          Birmingham, AL 35209
          Telephone: (205) 870-1970
          Facsimile: (205) 870-7763
          E-mail: gdevans@evanslawpc.com
                  ap@evanslawpc.com
                  mevans@evanslawpc.com

Defendant The City of Montgomery is represented by:

          Shannon L. Holliday, Esq.
          Robert D. Segall, Esq.
          Joel Caldwell, Esq.
          COPELAND, FRANCO, SCREWS & GILL, P.A.
          P.O. Box 347
          Montgomery, AL 36101-0347
          Telephone: (334) 420-2943
          Facsimile: (334) 834-3172
          E-mail: holliday@copelandfranco.com
                  segall@copelandfranco.com
                  caldwell@copelandfranco.com

               - and -

          Kimberly O. Fehl, Esq.
          Michael D. Brymer, Esq.
          CITY OF MONTGOMERY
          Legal Department
          Post Office Box 1111
          Montgomery, AL 36101-1111
          Telephone: (334) 625-2050
          Facsimile: (334) 625-2310
          E-mail: kfehl@montgomeryal.gov
                  mbrymer@montgomeryal.gov

Defendant Branch D. Kloess is represented by:

          Micheal S. Jackson, Esq.
          WEBSTER, HENRY, LYONS, BRADWELL, COHAN & BLACK, P.C.
          P. O. Box 239
          Montgomery, AL 36101-0239
          Telephone: (334) 264-9472
          Facsimile: (334) 264-9599
          E-mail: mjackson@websterhenry.com

Defendant CHC Companies, Inc., is represented by:

          F. Lane Finch, Jr., Esq.
          Brian Richardson, Esq.
          SWIFT CURRIE MCGHEE AND HIERS, LLP
          2 North 20th Street, Suite 1405
          Birmingham, AL 35203
          Telephone: (205) 314-2403
          Facsimile: (205) 244-1373
          E-mail: lane.finch@swiftcurrie.com
                  brian.richardson@swiftcurrie.com

Defendants Judicial Correctional Services, Inc., and Correctional
Healthcare Companies, Inc., are represented by:

          Michael L. Jackson, Esq.
          Larry S. Logsdon, Esq.
          WALLACE, JORDAN, RATLIFF & BRANDT, L.L.C.
          P.O. Box 530910
          Birmingham, AL 35253
          Telephone: (205) 874-0315
          Facsimile: (205) 874-3251
          E-mail: mjackson@wallacejordan.com
                  llogsdon@wallacejordan.com


MOPHIE INC: Stotz Seeks Certification of Class and Two Subclasses
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit captioned ERIC STOTZ and ALAN
CHARLES, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. MOPHIE INC., Case No. 2:16-cv-08898-GW-FFM (C.D.
Cal.), move the Court for an order certifying:

   -- a Consumer Class consisting of:

      All United States Citizens who, between the applicable
      statute of limitations and the present, purchased one or
      more Class Products;

   -- a California subclass consisting of:

      All United States Citizens who, between the applicable
      statute of limitations and the present, purchased one or
      more Class Products in California; and

   -- a New York subclass consisting of:

      All United States Citizens who, between the applicable
      statute of limitations and the present, purchased one or
      more Class Products in New York.

The Plaintiffs also ask the Court to appoint them as Class
Representatives and their attorneys as Class Counsel.

The Court will commence a hearing on August 3, 2017, at 8:30 a.m.,
to consider the Motion.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=QBAD23Uc

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Todd M. Friedman, Esq.
          Adrian R. Bacon, Esq.
          Thomas E. Wheeler, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
          21550 Oxnard St., Suite 780,
          Woodland Hills, CA 91367
          Telephone: (877) 206-4741
          Facsimile: (866) 633-0228
          E-mail: tfriedman@toddflaw.com
                  abacon@toddflaw.com
                  twheeler@toddflaw.com


MOSEX EXHIBIT: Faces "Kiler" Suit in Eastern District of New York
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Mosex Exhibit 1 LLC.
The case is titled as Marion Kiler, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Mosex Exhibit 1 LLC,
the Defendant, Case No. 2:17-cv-03110 (E.D.N.Y., May 23, 2017).

Mosex Exhibit is a museums and art gallery located in New York,
New York.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          C.K. Lee, Esq.
          LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC
          30 East 39th Street, 2nd floor
          New York, NY 10016
          Telephone: (212) 465 1188
          Facsimile: (212) 465 1181
          E-mail: cklee@leelitigation.com


MSI INVENTORY: "Roush" Seeks Unpaid Overtime, Missed Breaks
-----------------------------------------------------------
Kim Roush, Sheila Emmerling and Cindy Henderson, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MSI
Inventory Service Corporation, I-FRAN, Inc., James O. Mcclain,
Sandra B. Mcclain and Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants,
Case No. 2:17-at-00502 (E.D. Cal., May 13, 2017), seeks monetary
recovery, declaratory and injunctive relief including full
restitution and disgorgement of all compensation retained for
violations of California's Unfair Competition Law, including
damages plus interest, attorney's fees and costs under the
California Labor Code.

MSI operates an inventory accounting service for retailers and
merchants. I-Fran sells franchises for retailer and merchant
inventory accounting services, which includes a formula, system,
method, and integrated computer hardware and software. Kim Roush,
Sheila Emmerling and Cindy Henderson worked for the Defendants as
inventory specialists or inventory auditors, counting product
inventory in retail stores within the State of California,
assigned to a retail store and manually capturing the stock
keeping unit number for each item of physical inventory in the
assigned store to determine the number of items on hand.

Plaintiffs allege that they were not compensated for their travel
time to the stores they were assigned to, worked through meal/rest
period and were not given accurate wage statements. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Joseph W. Rose, Esq.
     Mehran Tahoori, Esq.
     ROSE LAW, A PROFFESSIONAL CORP.
     11335 Gold Express Drive, Suite 135
     Gold River, CA 95670
     Telephone: (916) 273-1260
     Facsimile: (916) 290-0148
     Email: legalteam@joeroselaw.com


MYLAN INC: Self-Insured Schools Hits Overpriced Albuterol Sulfate
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Self-Insured Schools of California, on behalf of itself and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Mylan, Inc., Sandoz,
Inc. and Taro Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., Defendants, Case No. 2:17-
cv-02158, (E.D. Pa., May 11, 2017), seeks treble damages,
injunctive relief, costs of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees
resulting from overcharging albuterol sulfate tablets in violation
of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act.

Albuterol Sulfate Tablets are used to treat asthma and other
breathing problems.

Self-Insured Schools of California is a joint powers authority
under California law with its principal place of business in
Bakersfield, California.

Mylan Inc. is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place
of business at 1000 Mylan Blvd., Canonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317.
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. is a West Virginia corporation with its
principal place of business at TSl Chestnut Ridge Road,
Morgantown, West Virginia 26505.

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. is a Michigan corporation with
its principal place of business in Cranbury, New Jersey. It sold
albuterol sulfate tablets throughout the United States. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

Joshua H. Grabar, Esq.
      SIEGEL BRILL P.A.
      100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1300
      Minneapolis, MN 55401
      Phones: (612) 337-6100
      Fax: (612) 339-6591

             - and -

      Joseph R. Saveri, Esq.
      JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM
      555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1210
      San Francisco, CA 94111
      Tel: (415) 500-6800
      Fax: (415) 395-9940


NESTLE USA: McFarland's Motion to Certify Class Denied as Moot
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. J. Leon Holmes denied as moot the Plaintiff's motion to
certify class filed in the lawsuit styled JOY MCFARLAND,
Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. NESTLE
USA, INC.; and NESTLE PREPARED FOODS COMPANY, Case No. 3:16-cv-
00100-JLH (E.D. Ark.).

Because the Court has preliminarily approved the amended joint
motion for approval of class and collective action settlement and
notice to the settlement class, the pending motion to certify
class is denied as moot, Judge Holmes said.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=c2rGmlQ4


NU-WAY TRANSPORTATION: Leadingham Seeks to Certify Drivers Class
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs ask the Court to conditionally certify the case
titled RICHARD LEADINGHAM, individually and on behalf of all
similarly situated v. NU-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., Case
No. 1:16-cv-01490-MMM-JEH (C.D. Ill.), as a collective action for
unpaid wages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act for a
conditional class defined as:

     All current and former Spotter Drivers or other job titles
     performing similar job duties employed by Nu-Way
     Transportation Services, Inc., at any time during the last
     three years, who were not paid overtime at the premium
     overtime rate for hours worked in excess of 40 in any given
     workweek.

The Plaintiffs also ask the Court to approve the Court-Authorized
Notice and Consent to Sue form, to compel the Defendant to produce
necessary information of the potential class members, to permit
the Plaintiffs' counsel to send the Notice, to require the
Defendant post a copy of the Notice in its facilities, to allow
the Plaintiffs' Counsel to mail and e-mail a reminder notice, to
allowing 90 days for putative Class members to return their
Consent to Sue form, and to appoint the counsel, Johnson Becker,
PLLC, as interim class counsel.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=JeMhd8XS

Plaintiffs Richard Leadingham and Robert Rust are represented by:

          Molly E. Nephew, Esq.
          Jacob R. Rusch, Esq.
          JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
          444 Cedar Street, Suite 1800
          Saint Paul, MN 55101
          Telephone: (612) 436-1800
          Facsimile: (612) 436-1801
          E-mail: mnephew@johnsonbecker.com
                  jrusch@johnsonbecker.com

               - and -

          Peter J. Flowers, Esq.
          MEYERS & FLOWERS, LLC
          3 North Second Street, Suite 300
          St. Charles, IL 60174
          Telephone: (630) 232-6333
          Facsimile: (630) 845-8982
          E-mail: pjf@meyers-flowers.com


PIER ENTERPRISES: Reyes Seeks Class Cert.; Hearing Set for Aug. 7
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit titled MIKE REYES, GORDON JACKSON,
FELIPE DEL MURO, and SERGIO LUNA, individually and on behalf of
all employees similarly situated v. PIER ENTERPRISES GROUP, INC.
DBA DC LOGISTICS and DBA DC FREIGHT, a California corporation;
TRINET HR CORPORATION, a California corporation; STRATEGIC
OUTSOURCING, INC., a California corporation; AMLEASE CORPORATION,
a corporation; ROUTE 66 HR OUTSOURCING, INC., a California
corporation; BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC., a corporation; and
DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Case No. 5:15-cv-02108-JGB-DTB
(C.D. Cal.), move for class certification.

Roxanne A. Davis, Esq., of Davis*Gavsie & Hakim, LLP, filed with
the Court a declaration in support of the Motion.

The Court will commence a hearing on August 7, 2017, at 9:00 a.m.,
to consider the Motion.

A copy of the Declaration is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=6HAk0szR

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Roxanne A. Davis, Esq.
          Frank Hakim, Esq.
          DAVIS*GAVSIE & HAKIM, LLP
          233 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 400
          Santa Monica, CA 90401
          Telephone: (310) 899-2059
          Facsimile: (310) 789-2249
          E-mail: Roxanne@DGHLawyers.com
                  Frank@DGHLawyers.com


PERMANENTE MEDICAL: Seeks OK of $6.2MM "Brown" Class Settlement
---------------------------------------------------------------
The parties in the lawsuit captioned DEBRA BROWN, SANDRA MORTON,
and BARBARA LABUSZEWSKI, individually and on behalf of all other
similarly situated individuals v. THE PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP,
INC., a California corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-05272-VC (N.D.
Cal.), jointly move the Court to:

   (1) conditionally certify a settlement class, which comprises
       all current and former hourly Advice Nurses, who have
       worked for TPMG from September 14, 2012, through
       preliminary approval;

   (2) preliminarily approve the parties' proposed $6,255,000
       collective/class action settlement;

   (3) appoint the Plaintiffs as Class Representatives, their
       counsel as Class Counsel, and Simpluris, Inc., as
       Settlement Administrator;

   (4) approve the forms of notice to the class of the
       settlement, the Class Member Information Sheet, and the
       Election Not to Participate in the Settlement; and

   (5) schedule a hearing on the final approval of the
       Settlement for October 5, 2017, or as soon thereafter as
       the Court is available.

The action is a Fair Labor Standards Act/California wage-and-hour
hybrid collective/class action.  The Plaintiffs and putative class
members are 1,325 registered "Advice Nurses," who staffed three
call centers operated by TPMG, located in Sacramento, San Jose and
Vallejo.

The $6,255,000 "Total Settlement Amount" will cover: (a) class
member payments; (b) TPMG's share of payroll taxes; (c) the
payment to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency
(the "LWDA") of $75,000 for PAGA penalties; (d) the Class
Representative Service Payments up to $30,000 ($10,000 each ); (e)
Class Counsel's fees and costs up to $1,951,500 (30% of the Total
Settlement Amount for fees plus $75,000 for costs); and (f) the
administration costs up to $30,000.

All Class Members except those who properly opt out will receive
Settlement Shares.  Settlement Shares will be calculated based on
actual Work Hours, as defined in the Settlement Agreement at
Section III.C.1.

The Court will commence a hearing on June 8, 2017, at 10:00 a.m.,
to consider the Motion.

A copy of the Joint Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=WcsZ1Kpc

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jahan C. Sagafi, Esq.
          OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP
          One Embarcadero Center, 38th Floor
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Telephone: (415) 638-8800
          Facsimile: (415) 638-8810
          E-mail: jsagafi@outtengolden.com

               - and -

          Kevin J. Stoops, Esq.
          Jesse L. Young, Esq.
          Jason J. Thompson, Esq.
          SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C.
          One Towne Square, Suite 1700
          Southfield, MI 48076
          Telephone: (248) 355-0300
          Facsimile: (248) 436-8453
          E-mail: kstoops@sommerspc.com
                  jyoung@sommerspc.com
                  jthompson@sommerspc.com

Defendant The Permanente Medical Group, Inc., is represented by:

          Jeffrey D. Wohl, Esq.
          Caitlin M. Wang, Esq.
          PAUL HASTINGS LLP
          101 California Street, 48th Floor
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Telephone: (415) 856-7000
          Facsimile: (415) 856-7100
          E-mail: jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
                  caitlinmarianwang@paulhastings.com


PORTFOLIO RECOVERY: Faces "Bereket" Suit in W.D. Washington
-----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Portfolio Recovery
Associates, LLC.  The case is styled as Abby Bereket, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v.
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, the Defendant, Case No. 2:17-
cv-00812 (W.D. Wash., May 24, 2017).

Portfolio Recovery helps customers resolve debt and design a
payment plan that fits their budget.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ryan Matthew Pesicka, Esq.
          Concord Law, P.C.
          Waterfront Park Building
          144 Railroad Avenue, Suite 236
          Edmonds, WA 98020
          Telephone: (206) 512 8029
          E-mail: Ryan@ConcordLawSeattle.com


PREMIER DERMATOLOGY: Smith et al. Seek Class Certification
----------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit captioned KIMBERLY SMITH AND STEVE SMITH, on behalf
of themselves, and all others similarly situated, the Plaintiffs,
v. PREMIER DERMATOLOGY AND FOREFRONT DERMATOLOGY, the Defendants,
Case No. 1:17-cv-03712 (N.D. Ill.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court
to:

   1. enter and reserve ruling on Plaintiffs' motion for class
      certification;

   2. allow for and schedule further discovery to take place on
      class-wide issues;

   3. grant Plaintiffs leave to file a supplemental memorandum in
      support of her motion for class Certification upon the
      conclusion of full, class-wide discovery;

   4. grant Plaintiffs' motion for class Certification in its
      entirety, including appointing Plaintiffs as the Class
      Representatives, and appoint her attorneys -- Ronald A.
      Marron of the Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron as class
      counsel; and

   5. provide all other relief that the Court deems reasonable
      and just.

According to the complaint, Defendants routinely contact
prospective customer through mass text campaigns, without their
consent to be texted. Defendants continue to text message those
prospective customers even after he or she revokes any consent for
future contact from Defendants. Plaintiff Smith visited Defendants
for a routine procedure.  After the visit and months later, in or
around the Fall of 2016, Ms. Smith began receiving unwanted and
unsolicited text messages from Defendants, approximately one text
message per week.  On April 18, 2017, Ms. Smith received a text
message from Defendants with the message "From Premier
Dermatology: Stubborn fat? Liposculpture is your solution
Reply BEGIN to converse with me, HELP for help, STOP to opt out.
Msg&Data rates apply." The text message came from the SMS code
95736.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=0w8SPAG9

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jeffrey M. Salas, Esq.
          SALAS WANG LLC
          73 W. Monroe, Suite 219
          Chicago, IL 60603
          Telephone: (312)803 4963
          E-mail: jsalas@salaswang.com

               - and -

          Ronald A. Marron, Esq.
          Alexis M. Wood, Esq.
          Kas L. Gallucci, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON
          651 Arroyo Drive
          San Diego, CA 92103
          Telephone: (619) 696 9006
          E-mail: ron@consumersadvocates.com
                  alexis@consumersadvocates.com
                  kas@consumersadvocates.com


PROFESSIONAL CLAIMS: Faces "Klain" Suit in E.D. New York
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Professional Claims
Bureau, Inc. The case is titled as Hana Klain, on behalf of
herself and all other similarly situated consumers, the Plaintiff,
v. Professional Claims Bureau, Inc., the Defendant, Case No. 1:17-
cv-03156 (E.D.N.Y., May 24, 2017).

Professional Claims provides receivable collection and management
services. The Company offers insurance follow-up, credentialing,
skip tracing, zero balance claim review, and practice management
services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Adam Jon Fishbein, Esq.
          ADAM J. FISHBEIN, P.C.
          735 Central Avenue
          Woodmere, NY 11598
          Telephone: (516) 668 6945
          E-mail: fishbeinadamj@gmail.com


PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS: "Talarico" Suit Seeks Damages, Overtime Pay
----------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Talarico, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiffs, v. Public Partnerships, LLC, d/b/a PCG
Public Partnerships, Case 5:17-cv-02165 (E.D. Pa., May 11, 2017)
seeks damages in the amount of her respective unpaid overtime
compensation, prejudgment interest, attorneys' fees and costs
pursuant to New York Labor Laws.

Defendant commonly provides direct care services, including
companionship, personal care and domestic assistance to
individuals with disabilities and the elderly in their homes.
Plaintiff worked as a direct care worker. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Richrd Katz, PA
     ARNOLD, BAYER & KATZ
     14oA East King Street
     Lancaster, PA 17602

            - and -

     Christine E. Webber, Esq.
     Miriam R. Nemeth, Esq.
     COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL, PLLC
     1100 New York Ave. NW, Fifth Floor
     Washington, DC 20005
     Telephone: (202) 408-4600
     Email: cwebber@oohenmilstein.com
            mnemeth@cohenmilstein.com

            - and -

     Rachhana T. Srey, Esq.
     Robert L. Schug, Esq.
     NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP
     4600 IDS Center, 80 South 8th Street
     Minneapolis, MN 55402
     Telephone (612) 256-3200
     Fax (612) 215-6870
     Email: srey@nka.com
            shug@nl

REAL CARE: Faces "Nesterenko" Suit in New York Supreme Court
------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Real Care Inc. The
case is entitled as NESTERENKO, ALLA INDIVIDUALLY & ON BEHALF OF
ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED, the Plaintiff, v. REAL CARE
INC., the Defendant, Case No. 1693/2017 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., May 24,
2017). The case is assigned to the Hon. Dawn M. Jimenez Salta.

Real Care is a family owned and operated organization that began
providing services to individuals with developmental disabilities
in 2007.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          VIRGINA & AMBINDER
          Telephone: (212) 943 9080

The Defendant is represented by:

          FORD & HARRISON LLP
          60 East 42nd Street 51st Floor
          New York, NY 10165
          Telephone: (212) 453 5900


RICH PRODUCTS: Plaintiffs Seek to Notify Route Sales Reps
---------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit titled SCOTT EHRLICH, SALVATORE REALE, and GARY
PRUSINSKI, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
in the state of Florida, the Plaintiffs, v. RICH PRODUCTS
CORPORATION, a Foreign Profit Corporation, the Defendant, Case No.
8:16-cv-03532-SCB-TGW (M.D. Fla.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court
for an Order permitting and supervising notice to Defendant's
current and former Route Sales Representatives who worked in
Florida one or more weeks during the three years from the filing
of the Complaint to the present and who are similarly situated of
their "opt-in" rights.

This is an action alleging overtime violations under the Fair
Labor Standards Act of 1938. The Act at section 216(b) authorizes
employees to bring an action under the Act on behalf of themselves
and others similarly situated.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=LY5zWgi4

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jay P. Lechner, Esq.
          Jason M. Melton, Esq.
          WHITTEL & MELTON, LLC
          One Progress Plaza
          200 Central Avenue, No. 400
          St. Petersburg, FL 33701
          Telephone: (727) 822 1111
          Facsimile: (727) 898 2001
          E-mail: Pleadings@theFLlawfirm.com
                  lechnerj@theFLlawfirm.com
                  kmoran@theFLlawfirm.com


RIVER LOUNGE: "Navarro" Seeks Overtime, Sues Over Missed Breaks
----------------------------------------------------------------
Carlos Navarro, on behalf of himself, FLSA Collective Plaintiffs
and the Class, Plaintiff, v. River Lounge Inc. (d/b/a Mad River
Bar & Grille), Michael Mastellone and John Durkin, Defendants,
Case 1:17-cv-03552 (S.D.N.Y., May 11, 2017) seeks to recover
unpaid overtime, unpaid minimum wages, liquidated damages, unpaid
spread of hours premium, statutory penalties and attorneys' fees
and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor
Law.

Defendants operate "Mad River Bar & Grille" located at 1442 Third
Avenue, New York, New York 10028 where Plaintiff was employed by
the Defendants as a barback and porter. Navarro claims to be
denied overtime pay, worked through breaks, had his tips withheld
and did not receive wage statements. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

     C.K. Lee, Esq.
     Anne Seelig, Esq.
     LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC
     30 East 39th Street, Second Floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Tel: (212) 465-1188
     Fax: (212) 465-1181


ROBERTSON COUNTY, TN: Class Certification Sought in "Cross" Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit styled Frankie Cross, et al. v.
Robertson County, Tennessee, et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-00715 (M.D.
Tenn.), file with the Court their claim under 42 U.S.C. 1983 with
request for declaratory judgment, injunctive relief and class
certification.

The Plaintiffs are incarcerated at the Robertson County Detention
Facility.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=EQUKy5HY


ROYAL SEAS: "McCurley" Hits Telemarketing Calls via Auto-dialer
---------------------------------------------------------------
John McCurley, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Royal Seas Cruises, Inc., Defendant., Case
No. 3:17-cv-00986 (S.D. Cal., May 12, 2017), seeks treble damages,
injunctive relief and any other relief for violation of the
Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Defendant operates cruises and uses telemarketers to place calls
to prospective customer. Plaintiff received such calls from Royal
Seas placed from an auto-dialer, says the complaint. [BN]

Plaintiffs are represented by:

      Joshua Swigart, Esq.
      Kevin Lemieux, Esq.
      HYDE AND SWIGART
      2221 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 101
      San Diego, CA 92108
      Telephone: (619) 233-7770
      Facsimile: (619) 297-1022 to 26
      Email: Josh@westcoastlitigation.com
             kevin@westcoastlitigation.com


SAGUARO LANDSCAPING: "Perez" Seeks Unpaid Wages, Overtime Pay
-------------------------------------------------------------
Pete Perez, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiffs, v. Saguaro Landscaping and Pool Service,
L.L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company, and Steve Mascorro
and Susana Mascorro, a Married Couple, Defendants, Case No. 2:17-
cv-01447, (D. Ariz., May 11, 2017), seeks unpaid wages, overtime,
liquidated damages, interest, attorneys' fees and costs for
violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Plaintiff worked as a foreman and technician for Defendant's
landscaping business and was allegedly misclassified as an
independent contractor. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Clifford P. Bendau II, Esq.
      Christopher J. Bendau, Esq.
      THE BENDAU LAW FIRM PLLC
      P.O. Box 97066
      Phoenix, AZ 85060
      Telephone: (480) 382-5176
      Email: cliffordbendau@bendaulaw.com


SALTOTO INC: Faces "Arriola" Suit in Southern Dist. of New York
---------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Saltoto, Inc. The
case is entitled as Rigoberto A. Arriola, individually and in
behalf of all other persons similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v.
Saltoto, Inc., jointly and severally, and Salvatore Inzerillo,
jointly and severally, the Defendants, Case No. 1:17-cv-03898
(S.D.N.Y., May 23, 2017).[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.


SCHURMAN RETAIL: "Sung" Sues Over Data Security Breach
------------------------------------------------------
Irene Sung, Kimberly Carboni, Annie Fulton, Cary Berger, Emmalyne
Owens, Ruth Phelps and Christine Willetts, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Schurman Fine
Papers d/b/a Schurman Retail Group, Defendant, Case No. 3:17-cv-
02760 (N.D. Cal., May 12, 2017) bring claims for negligence,
breach of contract, violations of the Unfair Competition Law, and
for violations of state security breach notification laws.

Schurman Retail Group is headquartered at 500 Chadbourne Road,
Fairfield, California 94534. The Company has approximately 450
retail stores nationwide, including under the brand name Papyrus.

On January 18, 2017, a cybercriminal posing as the Chief Financial
Officer of Schurman sent an email asking for the IRS Form W-2 for
all employees. W-2 contains sensitive and personal identifying
information, including name, address, salary and social security
number of the employee. To date, a number of current and former
Schurman employees have experienced identity theft. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Rosemary M. Rivas, Esq.
      Quentin A. Roberts, Esq.
      LEVI & KORSINSKY LLP
      44 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
      San Francisco, CA 94104
      Telephone: (415) 291-2420
      Facsimile: (415) 484-1294
      Email: rrivas@zlk.com
             qroberts@zlk.com

             - and -

      Gayle M. Blatt, Esq.
      CASEY GERRY SCHENK FRANCAVILLA BLATT & PENFIELD LLP
      110 Laurel Street
      San Diego, CA 92101
      Telephone: (619) 238-1811
      Facsimile: (619) 544-9232
      Email: gmb@cglaw.com


SCI DIRECT: "Strache" Sues Over Unsolicited Telemarketing Calls
---------------------------------------------------------------
KELLY STRACHE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated, the Plaintiff, v. SCI DIRECT, INC. d/b/a NEPTUNE
SOCIETY, the Defendant, Case No. 2017-CH-07421 (Ill. Cir. Ct., May
24, 2017), seeks to recover award of injunctive and other
equitable relief as necessary to protect the interests of the
Class, including, inter alia, an order prohibiting Defendant from
engaging in the wrongful and unlawful acts.

The case is action arises out of Defendant's practice of placing
telemarketing calls to individuals in the absence of any "do not
call" policy or training, in violation of the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act (TCPA). Because Defendant has failed to implement
these mandated policies and procedures, Defendant has made it
difficult for persons such as Plaintiff to stop Defendant's calls
once they begin. Despite asking Defendant to stop calling on
numerous occasions, Defendant continued to place telemarketing
calls to Plaintiff Strache's cellular telephone.

Yet because of Defendant's lack of written policy or training,
these requests were neither honored nor documented. Plaintiff
Strache is not alone. An internet search reveals dozens of reports
of unsolicited and unstoppable calls from Defendant. All of these
telephone calls were made in an effort to convince Plaintiff to
purchase services from Defendant, making them telemarketing.
Accordingly, Plaintiff brings this TCPA action on behalf of
herself and a proposed class of similarly situated individuals for
claims under TCPA.

SCI Direct is a new division of Service Corporation International
that is responsible for all direct cremation sales and services in
North America.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jeffrey Grant Brown, Esq.
          JEFFREY GRANT BROWN, P.C.
          221 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1414
          Chicago, IL 60601
          Telephone: (312) 789 9700
          E-mail: Jeff@JGBrownlaw.com

               - and -

          Jeremy M. Glapion, Esq.
          THE GLAPION LAW FIRM, LLC
          1704 Maxwell Drive
          Wall, NJ 07719
          Telephone: (732) 455 9737
          E-mail: img@glapionlaw.com


SECURE ONE: Faces "Israni" Suit in Central Dist. of California
--------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Secure One Capital
Corporation. The case is captioned as CHARI ISRANI, Individually
and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, the Plaintiff, v.
SECURE ONE CAPITAL CORPORATION, the Defendant, Case No. 8:17-cv-
00895 (C.D. Cal., May 23, 2017).

Secure One is a direct mortgage lender since 1995.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Nicholas J Bontrager, Esq.
          MARTIN AND BONTRAGER APC
          6464 West Sunset Boulevard Suite 960
          Los Angeles, CA 90028
          Telephone: (323) 940 1700
          Facsimile: (323) 328 8095
          E-mail: nick@mblawapc.com


SFPP RIGHT-OF-WAY CLAIMS: Court Denies Class Certification
----------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit re: SFPP Right-of-Way Claims, Case No. 8:15-cv-
00718-JVS-DFM (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge James V. Selna entered
an order:

   1. denying Plaintiff's motion for class certification of;

      "[a]ll landowners who, from January 1, 1983 to the date
      of class certification, own or have owned land in fee
      adjoining and underlying the railroad right-of-way granted
      under the Land Grants, or through condemnation, under which
      the pipeline is located within the State of California";

   2. denying Plaintiff's motion to strike expert Kelly Melle
      response to opposition to motion;

   3. denying Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company's motion
      to Exclude Cindi Straup; and

   4. granting Kinder Morgan Defendants' Motion to exclude Expert
      C. David Matthews.

The Court said, "Plaintiffs argued that an individualized inquiry
flips the burden onto them and renders the presumption meaningless
for class certification. But there is no special centerline
presumption for class-certification purposes: class certification
neither changes the requirement that a conveyance designate the
right-of-way as a boundary, nor does it alter the presumption's
rebuttable nature. In sum, the Court holds that Plaintiffs cannot
use the centerline presumption to overcome the need for
individualized inquiries".

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=Ue2DbAno


SILVER BAY: "Schwartz" Finds Tricon Merger Deal Inadequate
----------------------------------------------------------
Marvin H. Schwartz, Individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp.,
Irvin R. Kessler, Thomas W. Brock, Tanuja M. Dehne, Stephen G.
Kasnet, Thomas E. Siering, Daryl J. Carter, W. Reid Sanders, Mark
Weld, Silver Bay Management LLC, Silver Bay Operating Partnership
L.P., Tricon Capital Group Inc., TAH Acquisition Holdings LLC, and
TAH Acquisition LP, Defendants, Case 0:17-cv-01571 (D. Minn., May
11, 2017) seeks to preliminarily and permanently enjoin Defendants
from proceeding with, consummating or closing the merger of Silver
Bay with Tricon Capital Group.  The suit further seeks rescissory
damages in case it pushes through, costs of this action, including
reasonable allowance for plaintiff's and experts' fees, and such
other and further relief under the Securities and Exchange Act.

Silver Bay focuses on the acquisition, renovation, leasing, and
management of single-family properties for rental income and long-
term capital appreciation. It generates virtually all of its
revenue by leasing its portfolio of single-family properties. On
February 27, 2017, it was announced that Silver Bay Realty Trust
Corp. will be acquired by Tricon Capital Group Inc. and its
affiliates for $21.50 per share in cash. Schwartz, a Silver Bay
shareholder, claims that said amount is inadequate considering
Silver Bay's undisclosed financial projections for fiscal years
2017 through 2019. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Garrett D. Blanchfield, Esq.
      Brant D. Penney, Esq.
      REINHARDT WENDORF & BLANCHFIELD
      E1250 First National Bank Bldg.
      332 Minnesota Street
      St. Paul, MN 55101
      Telephone: (651) 287-2100
      Facsimile: (651) 287-2103
      Email: g.blanchfield@rwblawfirm.com
             b.penney@rwblawfirm.com

             - and -

      David T. Wissbroecker, Esq.
      ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
      655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
      San Diego, CA 92101
      Tel: (619) 231-1058

             - and -

      Frank J. Johnson, Esq.
      JOHNSON & WEAVER, LLP
      600 West Broadway, Suite 1540
      San Diego, CA 92101
      Telephone: (619) 230-0063
      Fax: (619) 255-1856
      Email: frankj@johnsonweaver.com

             - and -

      W. Scott Holleman, Esq.
      JOHNSON & WEAVER, LLP
      99 Madison Avenue, 5th Floor
      New York, NY 10016
      Telephone: (212) 802-1486
      Fax: (212) 602-1592
      Email: scotth@johnsonweaver.com


SOUTH CAROLINA: Mental Health Commission Faces Class Suit
---------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against the South Carolina
Mental Health Commission.  The case is captioned as AW, WL, RC,
MJ, CM, and HH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated, and Protection and Advocacy for People with Disabilities
Inc., a South Carolina non-profit corporation, the Plaintiffs. v.
John H Magill, in his official capacity as the Director of the
South Carolina Department of Mental Health; South Carolina
Department of Mental Health; and South Carolina Mental Health
Commission, the Defendants, Case No. 2:17-cv-01346-RMG (D.S.C.,
May 24, 2017). The case is assigned to the Hon. Judge Richard M
Gergel.

The SC Mental Health Commission is the governing body of the SC
Department of Mental Health and has jurisdiction over the state's
public mental health system. Its seven members are appointed for
five-year terms by the governor with advice and consent of the
Senate.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Dana Woodrum Lang, Esq.
          Kathryn Susan Mansfield, Esq.
          Sean Houseal, Esq.
          WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE AND RICE LLP
          5 Exchange Street
          Charleston, SC 29401
          Telephone: (843) 722 3400
          E-mail: dlang@wcsr.com
                  kathryn.mansfield@wcsr.com
                  shouseal@wcsr.com

               - and -

          Sarah Garland St Onge, Esq.
          Thornwell Simons, Esq.
          PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY
          FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES
          3710 Landmark Drive, Suite 208
          Columbia, SC 29204
          Telephone: (803) 217 6706
          E-mail: stonge@pandasc.org
                  simons@protectionandadvocacy-sc.org


SPECTRUM SOFTWARE: Comprehensive Health Seeks Class Certification
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit styled COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE
SYSTEMS OF THE PALM BEACHES, INC., a Florida corporation,
individually and as the representative of a class of similarly-
situated persons v. SPECTRUM SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC., Case No.
9:17-cv-80559-DMM (S.D. Fla.), moves for entry of an order
certifying this class:

     Each person or entity that was sent one or more telephone
     facsimile messages ("faxes") about medical transcription
     software and services, medical office management software,
     or electronic health record software available from
     www.spectramedi.com, www.imedware.com or www.hiarcehr.com.

The case involves common fact questions about the Defendant's fax
campaign and common legal questions under the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act.

Comprehensive Health contends that it files the Motion soon after
the filing of its class action complaint in order to avoid an
attempt by the Defendant to moot its individual claims in the
class action.  However, Comprehensive Health asserts, in this
case, additional discovery is necessary for the Court to determine
whether to certify the class the Plaintiff seeks to represent.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=lMYRTlJZ

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Phillip A. Bock, Esq.
          BOCK, HATCH, LEWIS & OPPENHEIM, LLC
          134 N. La Salle St., Suite 1000
          Chicago, IL 60602
          Telephone: (312) 658-5500
          Facsimile: (312) 658-5555
          E-mail: phil@classlawyers.com


SPOTIFY USA: Ingalls et al. Seek to Certify Class & Subclass
------------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit styled GREGORY INGALLS and TONY HONG, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated, the Plaintiffs, v.
SPOTIFY USA, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 - 10,
inclusive, the Defendants, Case No. 3:16-cv-03533-WHA (N.D. Cal.),
the Plaintiff will move the Court on June 29, 2017 at 8:00 a.m. in
the Courtroom of the Hon. Judge William Alsup to enter an order:

   1. certifying a class of:

      "all natural persons in California who, since June 23,
      2012, signed up for Spotify Premium on spotify.com through
      either a '3 months for a reduced price' or '30-day free
      trial' offer, selected a credit or debit card payment
      method, and whose credit or debit card was subsequently
      charged $9.99 after the expiration of the offer term"; and

   2. certifying a subclass of:

      "all natural persons in California who, since June 23,
      2012, signed up for Spotify Premium on spotify.com through
      either a '3 months for a reduced price' or '30-day free
      trial' offer, selected a credit or debit card payment
      method, and whose credit or debit card was subsequently
      charged $9.99 at least twice after the expiration of the
      offer term, who subsequently cancelled their subscription".

Excluded from the Classes are: (a) all judges who preside over
this case and their spouses; (b) all persons who elect to exclude
themselves from the Class; (c) all persons who have previously
executed and delivered to Defendant releases of all their claims
for all of their Class claims; (d) all counsel for Plaintiff; and
(e) Defendant's employees, officers, directors, agents, and
representatives and their family members.

A copy of the Notice of Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=5tJ5Cs92

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Gillian L. Wade, Esq.
          Sara D. Avila, Esq.
          Marc A. Castaneda, Esq.
          MILSTEIN JACKSON FAIRCHILD & WADE, LLP
          10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 1400
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Telephone: (310) 396 9600
          Facsimile: (310) 396 9635
          E-mail: gwade@mjfwlaw.com
                  savila@mjfwlaw.com
                  mcastaneda@mjfwlaw.com

               - and -

          Derek J. Meyer, Esq.
          LEONARDMEYER LLP
          5900 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500
          Los Angeles, CA 90036
          Telephone: (310) 220 0331
          E-mail: rmeyer@leonardmeyerllp.com

               - and -

          M. Ryan Casey, Esq.
          THE CASEY LAW FIRM, LLC
          20 NE Thompson Street
          Portland, OR 97212
          Telephone: (503) 928-7611
          E-mail: ryan@rcaseylaw.com


SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY: Faces "Minerva" Suit in N.Y. State Court
------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Suffolk County. The
case is styled as MINERVA, WILLIAM, RONALD BROCKMAN AND JOHN DOES
1-32 WHO WERE FORMERLY PARK POLICE UNIT AND ARE SIMILARLY SITUATED
BUT NOT YET IDENTIFIED, the Plaintiff, v. SUFFOLK, COUNTY OF, the
Defendant, Case No. 603976/2017 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., May 23, 2017). The
case is assigned to the Hon. Joseph Farneti.

Suffolk County is a suburban county on Long Island and the
easternmost county in the U.S. state of New York.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Christopher Ross, Esq.
          178 East Main Street
          Patchogue, NY 11772
          Telephone: (631) 654 5134

The Defendant is represented by:

          Dennis M. Brown, Esq.
          100 Veterans Mem Hwy, Pob 6100
          Hauppauge, NY 11788
          Telephone: (631) 853 4049


SUPERIOR LABOR: "Pineda" Action Seeks Unpaid Overtime Pay
---------------------------------------------------------
Juan Pineda, on behalf of himself and other persons similarly
situated Plaintiffs, v. Superior Labor Services, Inc. and Conrad
Industries, Inc., Defendants, Case No. 2:17-cv-04882 (E.D. La.,
May 11, 2017), seeks unpaid overtime wages, interest, liquidated
damages, and attorneys' fees and costs for violation of the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

Conrad is in the business of boat construction and is the owner
and/or operator of the shipyards at which Plaintiff was employed
as a laborer to assist in the building and refurbishing of boats
at multiple shipyard sites in Louisiana. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Roberto Luis Costales, Esq.
      Emily A. Westermeier, Esq.
      3801 Canal Street, Suite 207
      New Orleans, LA 70119
      Louisiana Bar #33696
      Telephone: (504) 534-5005
      Facsimile: (504) 272-2956
      Email: costaleslawoffice@gmail.com
             emily.costaleslawoffice@gmail.com

             - and -

      William H. Beaumont, Esq.
      3801 Canal Street, Suite 207
      New Orleans, LA 70119
      Telephone: (504) 483-8008
      Email: whbeaumont@gmail.com


SWIFT TRANSPORTATION: Court Won't Certify Class in "Mares" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit entitled Sadashiv Mares, the Plaintiff, v. Swift
Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al., the Defendants, Case
No. 2:15-cv-07920-VAP-KK (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Virginia A.
Phillips entered an order denying a class of:

   "all California residents who (a) were employed by Defendants
   as truck drivers at any time on or after February 27, 2011,
   and (b) were paid on a piece rate basis."

The Plaintiff alleges he and members of a putative class worked
for Defendant, a trucking company, and were paid piece rate
according to the number of miles they drove. The Plaintiff alleges
Defendant failed to authorize and permit rest periods in
accordance with section 226.7 of the California Labor Code.

Accordingly, given the extent of the "likely difficulties in
managing" this putative class action, the Court finds a class
action would not be the superior method of adjudicating the
putative class's claims. As Plaintiff has not met Rule 23(b)(3)'s
requirements, the Court declines to certify Plaintiff's proposed
class.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=T8mQrPnM


TRANS WORLD: "Roper" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime
----------------------------------------------------------
Natasha Roper, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Trans World Entertainment Corporation and Record Town,
Inc., Case No. 1:17-cv-00553-TJM-CFH (N.D.N.Y., May 19, 2017),
seeks to recover unpaid overtime compensation and damages pursuant
to the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Defendants operate approximately 300 F.Y.E retail stores in
the United States, selling entertainment and pop culture
merchandise. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Michael J. Palitz, Esq.
      SHAVITZ LAW GROUP, P.A.
      830 3rd Avenue, 5th Floor
      New York, NY 10022
      Telephone: (800) 616-4000
      Facsimile: (561) 447-8831
      E-mail: mpalitz@shavitzlaw.com

         - and -

      Gregg I. Shavitz, Esq.
      SHAVITZ LAW GROUP, P.A.
      1515 South Federal Highway, Suite 404
      Boca Raton, FL 33432
      Telephone: (561) 447-8888
      Facsimile: (561) 447-8831
      E-mail: gshavitz@shavitzlaw.com


TRANSAMERICA LIFE: "Gordon" Suit Seeks Certification of Classes
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit styled GORDON AND MARY FELLER, et al., the
Plaintiffs, v. TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, the Defendant,
Case No. 2:16-cv-01378-CAS-AJW (C.D. Cal.), the Plaintiffs will
move the Court on August 7, 2017, at 10:00 a.m.,
for an order to certify following classes:

National Class:

   "all persons who own an in-force Policy for which the MDR
   increase imposed by Transamerica beginning August 1, 2015, has
   resulted or will result in higher Monthly Deduction charges
   than those applicable under the rate schedule in effect before
   that date";

California Subclass:

   "all California residents who own an in-force Policy for which
   the MDR increase imposed by Transamerica beginning August 1,
   2015, has resulted or will result in higher Monthly Deduction
   charges than those applicable under the rate schedule in
   effect before that date";

California Senior Subclass:

   "all California residents who own an in-force Policy for which
   the MDR increase imposed by Transamerica beginning August 1,
   2015, has resulted or will result in higher Monthly Deduction
   charges than those applicable under the rate schedule in
   effect before that date, and who were age 65 or older when the
   MDR increase was imposed on them";

Excluded from the Classes are Transamerica, any parent,
subsidiary, affiliate, or controlled person of Transamerica, as
well as officers, directors, agents, servants or employees of
Transamerica, and the immediate family member of any such person.
Also excluded is any judge who may preside over this case.

The Plaintiffs also move the Court for:

   1. the appointment of Donna White, Gail Thompson and the
      Burton I. Schneck Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust dated
      Feb. 24, 1997 as class representatives of the National
      Class and for the appointment of Gail Thompson as the class
      representative for the California Subclass and the
      California Senior Subclass; and

   2. the appointment of Andrew S. Friedman of Bonnett Fairbourn
      Friedman & Balint, PC, Harvey Rosenfield of Consumer
      Watchdog, and Adam M. Moskowitz of Kozyak Tropin &
      Throckmorton, LLP as Lead Counsel for the Classes and the
      following firms as additional class counsel: Shernoff
      Bidart Echeverria Bentley LLP; Barrack Rodos & Bacine;
      Emerson Scott, LLP; Johnson Vines PLLC; Patterson Law
      Group; Harke Clasby & Bushman, LLP; Merlin Law
      Group, PA; and, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart &
      Shipley, PA.

A copy of the Notice of Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=DMeIixxd

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Andrew S. Friedman, Esq.
          Francis J. Balint, Jr., Esq.
          BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, PC
          2325 East Camelback Road, Suite 300
          Phoenix, AZ 85016
          Telephone: (602) 274 1100
          Facsimile: (602) 274 1199
          E-mail: afriedman@bffb.com
                  fbalint@bffb.com

               - and -

          Harvey Rosenfield, Esq.
          Jerry Flanagan, Esq.
          CONSUMER WATCHDOG
          2701 Ocean Park Blvd., Suite 112
          Santa Monica, CA 90405
          Telephone: (310) 392 0522
          Facsimile: (310) 392 8874
          E-mail: Harvey@consumerwatchdog.org
                  jerry@consumerwatchdog.org

               - and -

          Adam M. Moskowitz, Esq.
          Gail M. McQuilkin, Esq.
          KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON
          Robert J. Neary, Esq.
          Rachel Sullivan, Esq.
          Tal J. Lifshitz, Esq.
          2525 Ponce de Leon Blvd., 9th Floor
          Coral Gables, FL 33134
          Telephone: (305) 372 1800
          Facsimile: (305) 372 3508
          E-mail: amm@kttlaw.com
                  gam@kttlaw.com
                  rn@kttlaw.com
                  rs@kttlaw.com
                  tjl@kttlaw.com

               - and -

          William M. Shernoff, Esq.
          Travis M. Corby, Esq.
          SHERNOFF BIDART ECHEVERRIA BENTLEY LLP
          301 N. Ca§on Drive, Suite 200
          Beverly Hills, CA 90210
          Telephone: (310) 246 0503
          Facsimile: (310) 246 0380
          E-mail: wshernoff@shernoff.com
                  tcorby@shernoff.com

               - and -

          Stephen R. Basser, Esq.
          Mark R. Rosen, Esq.
          Samuel M. Ward, Esq.
          BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE
          One America Plaza
          600 West Broadway, Suite 900
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (619) 230 0800
          Facsimile: (619) 230 1874
          E-mail: sbasser@barrack.com
                  sward@barrack.com
                  mrosen@barrack.com

               - and -

          John G. Emerson, Esq.
          David G. Scott, Esq.
          EMERSON SCOTT, LLP
          830 Apollo Lane
          Houston, TX 77058
          Telephone: (281) 488 8854
          Facsimile: (281) 488 8867
          E-mail: jemerson@emersonfirm.com
                  dscott@emersonfirm.com

               - and -

          Christopher D. Jennings, Esq.
          JOHNSON VINES PLLC
          2226 Cottondale Lane, Suite 210
          Little Rock, AR 72202
          Telephone: (501) 372 1300
          Facsimile: (888) 505 0909
          E-mail: cjennings@johnsonvines.com

               - and -

          James R. Patterson, Esq.
          Allison H. Goddard, Esq.
          Catherine S. Wicker, Esq.
          PATTERSON LAW GROUP
          402 West Broadway, 29th Floor
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (619) 756 6990
          Facsimile: (619) 756 6991
          E-mail: jim@pattersonlawgroup.com
                  ali@pattersonlawgroup.com
                  catherine@pattersonlawgroup.com

               - and -

          Lance A. Harke, Esq.
          Howard M. Bushman, Esq.
          HARKE CLASBY & BUSHMAN LLP
          9699 NE Second Avenue
          Miami Shores, FL 33138
          Telephone: (305) 536 8220
          Facsimile: (305) 536 8229
          E-mail: lharke@harkeclasby.com
                  hbushman@harkeclasby.com

               - and -

          Chip Merlin, Esq.
          Denise H. Sze, Esq.
          MERLIN LAW GROUP, P.A.
          777 S. Harbour Island Blvd., Suite 950
          Tampa, FL 33602
          Telephone: (813) 229 1000
          Facsimile: (813) 229 3692
          E-mail: cmerlin@merlinlawgroup.com
                  deniseszelaw@gmail.com

               - and -

          Jack Scarola, Esq.
          SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA
          BARNHART & SHIPLEY PA
          2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
          West Palm Beach, FL 33409
          Telephone: (561) 686 6300
          Facsimile: (561) 383 9451
          E-mail: jsx@searcylaw.com


TRUSTCO BANK: "Dejkunchorn" Suit Seeks Certification of Class
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit captioned CHRISTINA DEJKUNCHORN, JESSICA SAMUEL,
TIA COLLINS and VINCENT JOHNSTON, the Plaintiffs, v. TRUSTCO BANK,
the Defendant, Case No. 6:16-cv-02171-GAP-KRS (M.D. Fla.), the
Plaintiffs move the Court to:

   1. conditionally certify a class;

   2. implement a procedure whereby Court-approved Notice of
      Plaintiffs' Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) claim is
      delivered (via US Mail and e-mail to):

      "all former or current employees who, were/are employed by
      Trustco Bank and who were/are required to perform "opening
      procesures" prior to commencing their paid shift and/or
      were required to perform "closing procedures" after their
      paid shift was concluded";

      "all former or current employees who, were/are employed by
      Trustco Bank and who were/are required to utilize their
      lunch break for the purpose of travelling between branches
      of Trustco Bank";

      "all former or current employees who, were/are employed by
      Trustco Bank and who were/are required to work through
      their lunch breaks; and

      "all former or current employees who, were/are employed by
      Trustco Bank and whose time records were manipulated by
      Trustco Bank to prevent those employees from accruing
      overtime hours; and

   3. require Defendant to identify all potential opt-in
      employees by providing a list in written and electronic
      format, of all current and former employees in the
      foregoing class who worked for Defendant at any time during
      the previous three years.

The Plaintiffs seek to recover unpaid overtime wages and damages
pursuant to the FLSA.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=1s13Mzl0

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          David H. Charlip, Esq.
          CHARLIP LAW GROUP, LC
          11900 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 200
          North Miami, FL 33181
          E-mail: dcharlip@charliplawgroup.com

               - and -

          Ortavia D. Simson, Esq.
          SIMON LAW GROUP, PA
          13790 Bridgewater Crossings Blvd., No. 1080
          Windermere, FL 34786
          Telephone: (407) 622 5090
          Facsimile: (407) 583 4185
          E-mail: simonlawg@gmail.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Jeffrey R. Jontz, Esq.
          Eric B. Jontz, Esq.
          SWAN, HADLEY, STUMP, DIETRICH & SPEARS, P.A.
          PO Box 1961
          Winter Park, FL 32790
          Telephone: (407) 647 2777
          Facsimile: (407) 647 2157
          E-mail: jjontz@swannhadley.com


U.S. BANK: Dolegiewicz Sues Over Force-Placed Insurance Policies
----------------------------------------------------------------
MARIUSZ DOLEGIEWICZ, individually, and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., as
Trustee for LSF9Master Participation Trust, and CALIBER HOME
LOANS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, the Defendants, Case No.
2017CH07405 (Ill. Cir. Ct., May 24, 2017), seeks to recover
statutory damages, attorney's fees and costs as a direct and
proximate result of Caliber's and Trustee's failure to comply with
the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and Regulation.

Dolegiewicz brings this Complaint against Caliber and Trustee on
behalf of himself and a Class of similarly situated individuals
who had insurance policies force-placed on their mortgage
agreements and/or who were charged for property inspections that
did not occur.

Caliber and Trustee force-placed insurance policies on
Dolegiewicz's and Class members' mortgage agreements in excess of
what was reasonable and appropriate to protect Caliber's and
Trustee's interest in Dolegiewicz's and Class members' properties.

After force-placing insurance policies on Dolegiewicz's and Class
members' mortgage agreements, Caliber received kickbacks, which
include but are not limited to: unearned "commissions" for work
purportedly performed to procure individual policies, "expense
reimbursements" allegedly paid to reimburse Caliber for expenses
incurred in the placement of force-placed insurance policies,
payments of illusory reinsurance premiums that carry no
commensurate transfer of risk, and property inspection fees for
property inspections that were neither performed nor intended to
be performed.

U.S. Bank Trust offers financial services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Thomas A. Zimmerman, Esq.
          Sharon A. Harris, Esq.
          Matthew C. De Re, Esq.
          Nickolas J. Hagman, Esq.
          Maebetty Kirby, Esq.
          ZIMMERMAN LAW OFFICES, P.C.
          77 W. Washington Street, Suite 1220
          Chicago, IL 60602
          Telephone: (312) 440 0020
          Facsimile: (312) 440 4180
          E-mail: tom@attorneyzim.com
                  sharon@attorneyzim.com
                  matt@attorneyzim.com
                  nick@attorneyzim.com
                  maebetty@attorneyzim.com

               - and -

          Arthur C. Czaja, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICES OF ARTHUR C. CZAJA & ASSOCIATES
          7521 N. Milwaukee Avenue
          Niles, Illinois 60714
          Telephone: (847) 647 2106
          Facsimile: (847) 647 2057
          E-mail: arthur@czajalawoffices.com


UNION PACIFIC: Cert. Bid in Right-of-Way Suit Under Submission
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. James V. Selna has taken under submission certain motions
pending in the lawsuit titled In re SFPP Right-of-Way Claims, Case
No. 8:15-cv-00718-JVS-DFM (C.D. Cal.).

The motions are:

   -- Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification (filed
      January 30, 2017);

   -- Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company's Motion to
      Exclude Cindi Straup (filed March 13, 2017) (Joinder by
      Kinder Morgan Defendants);

   -- Kinder Morgan Defendants' Motion to Exclude Expert C. David
      Matthews (filed March 13, 2017) (Joinder by Union Pacific
      Railroad); and

   -- Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Expert Kelly Melle Response to
      Opposition to Motion (filed April 3, 2017).

According to the civil minutes, cause was called and counsel made
their appearances.  The Court's tentative ruling was issued and
counsel made their arguments.

A copy of the Civil Minutes is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=drBiRG5H

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Norman Siegel, Esq.
          Barrett Vahle, Esq.
          STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP
          460 Nichols Road, Suite 200
          Kansas City, MO 64112
          Telephone: (816) 714-7112
          E-mail: siegel@stuevesiegel.com
                  vahle@stuevesiegel.com

               - and -

          Thomas S. Stewart, Esq.
          STEWART WALD & MCCULLEY LLC
          2100 Central, Suite 22
          Kansas City, MO 64108
          Telephone: (816) 303-1500
          Facsimile: (816) 527-8068
          E-mail: stewart@swm.legal

               - and -

          Albert Y. Chang, Esq.
          BOTTINI & BOTTINI, INC.
          7817 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 102
          La Jolla, CA 92037
          Telephone: (858) 914-2001
          Facsimile: (858) 914-2002
          E-mail: achang@bottinilaw.com

Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company is represented by:

          John K. Sherk III, Esq.
          Tammy B. Webb, Esq.
          SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
          One Montgomery, Suite 2700
          San Francisco, CA 94104
          Telephone: (415) 544-1900
          Facsimile: (415) 391-0281
          E-mail: jsherk@shb.com
                  tbwebb@shb.com

Defendants Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., Kinder Morgan Operating L.P.
"D", and SFPP, L.P., are represented by:

          M. Ray Hartman III, Esq.
          Steven M. Strauss, Esq.
          COOLEY LLP
          4401 Eastgate Mall
          San Diego, CA 92121
          Telephone: (858) 550-6001
          Facsimile: (858) 550-6420
          E-mail: rhartman@cooley.com
                  sms@cooley.com


VERITY HEALTHSYSTEM: Faces "Johns" Suit Over Security Breach
------------------------------------------------------------
Jarmaine Johns as an individual and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Verity Healthsystem of California, Inc.,
Case No. 17cv02216 (Cal. Super. Ct., May 19, 2017), is an action
for damages that arose from the data security breach by which
unauthorized individuals accessed and publicized names and
addresses, Social Security numbers, employment records including
salary history; human resources records, medical information, and
financial information, the "personally identifiable information"
or "PII" of Verity's current and former employees from 2015 to the
present.

Verity Healthsystem of California, Inc. owns and operates
hospitals and medical foundation in Northern and Southern
California. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Kevin Mahoney, Esq.
      Treana L. Allen, Esq.
      MAHONEY LAW GROUP, APC
      249 E. Ocean Blvd., Ste. 814
      Long Beach, CA 90802
      Telephone: (562) 590-5550
      Facsimile: (562) 590-8400
      E-mail: kmahoney@mahoney.law.net
              tallen@mahoney.law.net


W BBQ: Faces "Walker" Suit in Eastern District of New York
----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against W BBQ Holdings, Inc.
The case is captioned as Ricardo Walker, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. W BBQ Holdings,
Inc., the Defendant, Case No. 2:17-cv-03107 (E.D.N.Y., May 23,
2017).[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          C.K. Lee, Esq.
          LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC
          30 East 39th Street, 2nd floor
          New York, NY 10016
          Telephone: (212) 465 1188
          Facsimile: (212) 465 1181
          E-mail: cklee@leelitigation.com


WARREN, MI: Court Certifies Two Classes in NILI Suit
----------------------------------------------------
In the lawsuit styled NILI 2011, LLC; EETBL, LLC, and INVESTMENT
REALTY SERVICES, LLC D/B/A SBYC GARNER, LLC, the Plaintiffs, v.
THE CITY OF WARREN, the Defendant, Case No. 2:15-cv-13392-GAD-RSW
(E.D. Mich.), the Hon. Judge Gershwin A. Drain entered an order
granting, in part, Plaintiff's motion to certify class.

Class One and Class Three are certified:

   "all persons and entities that currently own or at one time
   owned any parcel of real property located within the City of
   Warren for the purpose of renting or leasing a residential
   structure or multiple family unit on that property who or
   which has been issued a civil infraction for failing to obtain
   a certificate of compliance and subsequently paid them,
   stemming from an inspection under the IPMC and the City Code,
   at any time since September 28, 2009 and through the date of
   final judgment, or such longer amount of time as may be
   allowed by law (Class One)" ; and

   "all persons and entities who paid rental registration and
   inspection fees to the City of Warren pursuant to the
   ordinance permitting searches without a warrant (Class Three).

The Court denied certification of Class Two, which consists of:

   "all persons and entities that currently own or at one time
   owned any parcel of real property in the City of Warren for
   the purpose of renting or leasing a residential structure or
   multiple family unit on that property, who or which have made
   repairs pursuant to a City of Warren International Property
   Maintenance Code of 2009 City Certification Inspection Report
   or other deficiency notice issued by the City of Warren
   without being provided with notice of the violation or their
   ability to appeal such determination to an impartial Board of
   Appeals (Class Two)".

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=tWBCj9Yr


WESTERN DENTAL: "King" Sues Over Unauthorized Account Debiting
--------------------------------------------------------------
Renata King, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Western Dental Services, Inc., and Does 1-
10, inclusive, Defendant, Case No. 2:17-cv-03622 (C.D. Cal., May
14, 2017), seeks injunctive relief, statutory damages, treble
damages and all other relief for violation of the Electronic Funds
Transfer Act, the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and
the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Defendants debited Plaintiff's bank accounts on a recurring basis
without obtaining a written authorization signed or similarly
authenticated for preauthorized electronic fund transfers, says
the complaint.  The Defendants also used an automatic telephone
dialing system in connection with collection on alleged debts
without the call recipient's prior express consent.

Western Dental Services, Inc. provides dental care services that
Plaintiff allegedly owes. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Todd M. Friedman, Esq.
      Adrian R. Bacon, Esq.
      Meghan E. George, Esq.
      LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
      21550 Oxnard St., Suite 780
      Woodland Hills, CA 91367
      Phone: (877) 206-4741
      Fax: 866-633-0228
      Email: tfriedman@toddflaw.com
             abacon@toddflaw.com
             mgeorge@toddflaw.com


WORLD SERVICE: "Umana" Sues Over Wage & Hour Laws Violations
------------------------------------------------------------
YENY UMANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated, the Plaintiff, v. WORLD SERVICE WEST / LA INFLIGHT
SERVICE COMPANY, LLC, a California limited liability company; and
DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, the Defendant, Case No. BC662542
(Cal. Super. Ct., May 24, 2017), seeks to recover overtime and
minimum wages, premium wages for missed meal and rest periods,
penalties, and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs under
California Labor Code.

According to the complaint, the Defendants have had a consistent
policy of failing to pay wages, including overtime wages; failing
to provide 30 minute uninterrupted meal period for days on which
the employees worked more than five hours in a workday and a
second 30 minute uninterrupted meal periods for days on which the
employees worked in excess of 10 hours in a work day, and failing
to provide compensation for such unprovided meal periods; and
failing to provide rest periods of at least 10 minutes per four
hours worked or major fraction and failing to provide compensation
for such unprovided rest periods.

World Service West was founded in 1988. The Company's line of
business includes operating and maintaining airports and flying
fields.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Michael Nourmand, Esq.
          James A. De Sario, Esq.
          THE NOURMAND LAW FIRM, APC
          8822 West Olympic Boulevard
          Beverly Hills, CA 90211
          Telephone (310) 553 3600
          Facsimile (310) 553 3603


YAHOO! INC: "Wahl" Suit Removed to N.D. Cal.
--------------------------------------------
The case captioned Andrew Wahl, an individual, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Yahoo!
Inc., a Delaware corporation and Does 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants, Case No. 17-CV-308083 (Cal. Super., March 31, 2017),
was removed to the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California on May 12, 2017, under Case No. 5:17-cv-
02745.

Plaintiff purchased subscriptions from Defendant Yahoo! Inc. dba
Rivals.com, whose credit card was charged on a recurring basis by
Defendant, as part of an automatic renewal plan or continuous
service offer in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law
of the California Business and Professions Code. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Darius Ogloza, Esq.
     David Fortney, Esq.
     Micah Nash, Esq.
     Josephine Lee, Esq.
     OGLOZA FORTNEY LLP
     535 Pacific Avenue, Suite 201
     San Francisco, CA 94133
     Email: dogloza@oglozafortney.com
            dfortney@oglozafortney.com
            mnash@oglozafortney.com
            jlee@oglozafortney.com

Defendant is represented by:

     Matthew S. Kahn, Esq.
     Peter C. Squeri, Esq.
     GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
     555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
     San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
     Telephone: (415) 393-8200
     Facsimile: (415) 393-8306
     Email: mkahn@gibsondunn.com
            psqueri@gibsondunn.com

            - and -

     Perlette Michäle Jura, Esq.
     Timothy W. Loose, Esq.
     333 South Grand Avenue
     Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
     Telephone: (213) 229-7000
     Facsimile: (213) 229-7520
     Email: pjura@gibsondunn.com
            tloose@gibsondunn.com


YES HOSPITALITY: "Schrank" Suit Moved to S.D. Florida
-----------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Benjamin Schrank, on behalf of
himself and similarly situated employees, the Plaintiff, v. Yes
Hospitality, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; Yes Dream,
LLC, a Florida limited liability company; and Ralph Pagano, an
individual, Case No. 17-06048 CA 01, was removed on May 24, 2017
from the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, to the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of Florida (Miami). The District
Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:17-cv-21941-KMW to the proceeding.
The Case is assigned to the Hon. Judge Kathleen M. Williams.

Yes Hospitality is in the hotel or motel management business.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Brody Max Shulman, Esq.
          Jason Saul Remer, Esq.
          REMER & GEORGES-PIERRE, PLLC
          Courthouse Tower
          44 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200
          Miami, FL 33130
          Telephone: (305) 416 5000
          Facsimile: (305) 416 5005
          E-mail: bshulman@rgpattorneys.com
                  jremer@rgpattorneys.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Michael Joseph Sacks, Esq.
          MICHAEL J. SACKS
          7210 Wisteria Avenue
          Parkland, FL 33076
          Telephone: (954) 575 8691
          E-mail: msacks@bellsouth.net


ZILLOW INC: Accused of Wrongful Conduct Over Property Listing
-------------------------------------------------------------
Vipul B. Patel, individually, Bhasker T. Patel, as co-Trustee of
the Jyotsna B. Patel Living Trust dated March 9, 2001, Jyotsna B.
Patel, as co-Trustee of the Jyotsna B. Patel Living Trust dated
March 9, 2001, and Castle Bldrs.com, Inc., individually and on
behalf of others similarly situated v. Zillow, Inc. and Zillow
Group, Inc., filed in Illinois Circuit Court on May 19, 2017, is
an action for damages as a result of the Defendants' wrongful
conduct in listing homes and other real estate assets on their
site with a "Zestimate" as to the homes' value.

The plaintiff says this constitutes a violation of the Real Estate
Appraiser Licensing Act. Gathering financial/appraisal information
relative to the Plaintiffs' and the Class' real property assets,
compiling Plaintiffs' and the Class' financial/appraisal
information, and publicly disseminating financial/appraisal
opinions relative to Plaintiffs' and the Class' real property
violates the tort of invasion of seclusion, says the complaint.
Attempting to market the Plaintiffs and the Class through their
website and their marketing practices contained, including but not
limited to (1) the "Zestimate" tool in itself; (2) their taking
financial advantage of the confusion caused by (3) their lack of
disclosures on several topics; and/or (4) their "Zestimate";
collection, compilation and public dissemination of
financial/appraisal opinions relative to the Plaintiffs' and the
Class' property constitutes a violation of the Uniform Deceptive
Trade Practices Act and the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, it adds.

The Defendants own and operate an online real estate database
company at 208 S. LaSalle St., Suite 814, Chicago, IL 60604. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Barbara Andersen, Esq.
      ANDERSEN LAW LLC
      2862 Commons Drive
      Glenview, IL 60026
      Telephone: (708) 805-1123
      E-mail: bandersen@andersen-law.com

         - and -

      C. Jeffrey Thut, Esq.
      NOONAN PERILLO & THUT LTD.
      25 North County Street
      Waukegan, IL 60085
      Telephone: (847) 244-0111
      E-mail: jthut@npt-law.com

ZODIAC SERVICES: "Uribe" Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages Under Labor Code
-----------------------------------------------------------------
JOSE URIBE, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated,
the Plaintiff, v. ZODIAC SERVICES AMERICAS LLC; ZODIAC AEROSPACE;
and DOES 1 to 100, Inclusive, the Defendant, Case No. BC662712
(Cal. Super. Ct., May 24, 2017), seeks to recover unpaid wages and
interest for unpaid wages for all hours worked at minimum wage and
overtime hours worked at the overtime rate of pay under California
Labor Code.

According to the complaint, the Defendant has a policy, practice,
and/or procedure of rounding down or shaving down employees' daily
hours worked to the nearest quarter of an hour; and automatically
deducting 30 minutes from employees' daily hours worked for first
meal periods. The Defendant also failed to authorize or permit a
first meal period prior to the employee's sixth hour of work;
failed to authorize or permit second meal periods; failed to
authorize or permit third rest periods; and failed to provide
accurate wage statements.

Zodiac Services Americas LLC operates as a manufacturer and
distributor of aircraft and automotive parts and equipment.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Joseph Lavi, Esq.
          Vincent C. Granberry, Esq.
          Vanessa Kamau, Esq.
          LAVI & EBRAHIMIAN, LLP
          8889 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 200
          Beverly Hills, CA 90211
          Telephone: (310) 432 0000
          Facsimile: (310) 432 0001



                         *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N  I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Marion
Alcestis A. Castillon, Ma. Cristina Canson, Noemi Irene A. Adala,
Joy A. Agravantefor, Valerie Udtuhan, Julie Anne L. Toledo,
Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2017. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Joseph Cardillo at 856-381-
8268.



                 * * *  End of Transmission  * * *