CAR_Public/190702.mbx               C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

              Tuesday, July 2, 2019, Vol. 21, No. 131

                            Headlines

24/7 WELDING: Denies Workers Overtime Pay, Roque Suit Says
325 THIRNICBAR: Vasil Hits Tip Pool, Seeks Overtime Pay
3M COMPANY: Short Seeks Damages Over Defective Earplug
ACADEMY LTD: Diaz Asserts Violation of Disabilities Act
ACCC INSURANCE: Ihrig Files Class Suit in Mississippi

ALGENIST LLC: Diaz Alleges ADA Violation in New York
AMER SPORTS: Figueroa Suit Alleges ADA Violation
AMERICAN MEDICAL: Faces Oswald Suit Over LabCorp Data Breach
ANDALOU NATURALS: Diaz Files Class Suit under ADA in New York
ANTHONY'S COAL: Lopez Suit Alleges FLSA and NYLL Violations

APPLE MEDICAL: Fails to Pay Proper Overtime Wages, Li Claims
ASURION LLC: Diaz Alleges Violation under Disabilities Act
BATTERBEE ROOFING: Fails to Pay Laborers' Overtime, Monzalvo Says
BATTERSON LLP: Miles Suit Seeks to Recover Overtime Pay Under FLSA
BAYBRIDGE SZECHUAN: Fails to Pay Overtime Under FLSA, Lan Claims

BLACKROCK CREDIT: Saba Seeks to Enforce Trust Shareholders' Rights
BROOKLYN BORN: Millin Seeks to Recover Overtime Under FLSA & NYLL
CHICAGO, IL: Brown Suit Alleges Consumer Fraud Act Violation
CR ENGLAND: Virgne Sues Over Illegal SMS Ad Blasts
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH: Beck Suit Alleges FLSA Violation

DANIEL AUSTIN: Nelson Files Class Suit in Colorado
DELUXE GREEN: Tem Sues Over Unpaid Overtime
DINEINFRESH INC: Olsen Files Class Suit under ADA in New York
DYNAMIC RECOVERY: Zavinskiy Files Class Suit under FDCPA
ESTENSON LOGISTICS: Parsons Labor Suit Removed to E.D. California

EXACT SCIENCES: Arcare Suit Alleges TCPA Breach
EXPLORE GROUP: Sostaita Seeks Unpaid Overtime Pay
F & B ASSOCIATES: Fails to Properly Pay Workers, Ghigliazza Says
FACEBOOK INC: Class Action Suit Over Robocalls Reinstated
FASHION NOVA: Johnson Sues Over Unsolicited Text Messages

FIRST AMERICAN: Fails to Protect Customers' PII, Mohr Suit Claims
GLOBAL CONTACT: Agresti Sues Over Unpaid Spread-of-Hours Wages
GLOBAL RADAR: Accused by Job Suit of Violating FCRA
GREENLIGHT ENERGY: Sells Overpriced Electricity, Williams Suit Says
GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY: Diaz Asserts Breach of ADA in New York

GRUBHUB INC: Marshall Seeks to Block Future Nonconsensual Calls
HEALTH INSURANCE: Removes Parker RICO Suit to S.D. Florida
HIPNATION OPERATIONS: Sent Unsolicited Text Ads, Acosta Suit Says
I.Q. DATA: Smilowitz Hits Confusing Collection Letter
INCLAN PAINTING: Painters Seek Unpaid Overtime Wages

INTEGON PREFERRED: Washington Suit Asserts Breach of Contract
IOWA: Experts Decry Use of Restraints at School
IQ DATA: Riesel Disputes Amount of Alleged Debt Owed
IRON LION: Riddle Seeks Unpaid Overtime, Damages Under FLSA
J.G. WENTWORTH: Burner Suit Alleges FLSA Violation

JUMIA TECHNOLOGIES: Cohen Milstein Conducting Probe
KIDS TOWN: Minyety Suit Seeks to Recover Overtime Pay and Damages
KOSTMAYER CONSTRUCTION: Baez-Acuna Seeks to Recover Unpaid OT Wages
LABORATORY CORP: Shulman Files Class Suit in North Carolina
LE ENERGY: Charvat Sues Over Unsolicited Calls

LLOYD'S LONDON: Sept. 18 Settlement Fairness Hearing Set
LOCO FOOD: Knowles Asserts Breach of Disabilities Act
LOS ANGELES, CA: LA DWP GM to Step Down After Controversial Deal
MAMMOTH ENERGY: Schall Law Firm Files Class Action Lawsuit
MCAFEE INC: Oct. 4 Settlement Fairness Hearing Set

MDL 2887: Albion Suit over Tainted Pet Food Moved to Kansas
MDL 2887: Manier Suit over Tainted Pet Food Moved to Kansas
MENN LAW: Cole Sues Under FDCPA Over Deceptive Collection Letter
MID VALLEY COLLECTION: Ochoa Files Class Suit under FDCPA
MIDLAND CREDIT: Davis Sues over Debt Collection Practices

MIDWESTERN HOLDINGS: Qasemy Seeks Unpaid Wages & Overtime Pay
OREGON: Pendleton Ceases Jailing People Over Court Fines
ORTHONET LLC: Solis Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages
PHILADELPHIA PARKING: Berger Suit Alleges Malicious Prosecution
PIVOTAL SOFTWARE: Nhung Tran Says IPO Documents Misleading

PURDUE PHARMA: Brant Sues over Opioid Distribution in Arizona
PURDUE PHARMA: DeLancey Sues over Unfair Marketing of Opioids
PURDUE PHARMA: DeMaro Seeks Medical Monitoring for Babies with NAS
RA MEDICAL SYSTEMS: Schall Law Firm Files Class Action Lawsuit
RCI HOSPITALITY: Schall Law Firm Files Class Action Lawsuit

RETRIEVAL-MASTERS CREDITORS: Faces Lanouette Class Suit in N.Y.
SMJ CONSTRUCTION: Li Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Under FLSA & NYLL
SOMCHAI AND COMPANY: Bao Seeks Overtime Pay, Damages
SPROUT FINANCIAL: Picow Sues Over Illegal Telemarketing Calls
ST. LOUIS, MO: Ruling vs. Inmates Held Over Non-Payment of Bond

ST. TROPEZ II: Palacios Sues over Unpaid Overtime, Medical Leave
STA MANAGEMENT: Mata Seeks to Recover Minimum and Overtime Wages
STAR BRANDS: Altes Sues Over Harmful Oil in Pretzels
SUNLANDS TECHNOLOGY: Rosen Continues to Probe Securities Claims
TELLURIAN INC: Chambers v. BOD Seeks to Halt Stock Issuance

TORRENT PHARMA: Sanders Sues Over Carcinogen in Hypertension Meds
TRINITY PACKAGING: Robertson Suit Seeks Unpaid Overtime Wages
UNITED STATES: Brito Files Petition for Habeas Corpus
UNITED STATES: CAVC Certifies 1st Class Action
UNITED STATES: Ruling vs. Abortion Policy for Immigrants Upheld

UNITED STATES: Sued in Boston Over Detention of Immigrants
UNIVERSAL MUSIC: King Holmes to Pursue Suit Over 2008 Fire
USPTO: Morinville Sues over SAWS Flag on Patent Application
VISTA HOTEL: Stewart Asserts Breach of Disabilities Act
VIVIAN HORAN: Web Site Not Blind-Friendly, Matzura Suit Says

WEISS MEMORIAL: Heard Seeks to Stop Illegal Use of Biometric Data
WELLS FARGO: Chang Suit Alleges Breach of Fiduciary Duty

                            *********

24/7 WELDING: Denies Workers Overtime Pay, Roque Suit Says
----------------------------------------------------------
Luis Roque, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. 24/7 Welding Services, Inc., Defendant,
Case No. 19-cv-00126, (W.D. Tex., May 21, 2019), seeks unpaid
regular hourly wages, unpaid overtime, liquidated damages,
attorney's fees and costs of suit and such other relief under the
Fair Labor Standards Act.

24/7 Welding is a welding services company for the oil and gas
industry where Roque worked as a welder. Aside from failing to pay
overtime pay for work in excess of forty hours per week, 24/7
Welding also failed to provide accurate wage statements, asserts
the complaint. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Melissa Moore, Esq.
      Bridget Davidson, Esq.
      MOORE & ASSOCIATES
      Lyric Center
      440 Louisiana Street, Suite 675
      Houston, TX 77002
      Telephone: (713) 222-6775
      Facsimile: (713) 222-6739


325 THIRNICBAR: Vasil Hits Tip Pool, Seeks Overtime Pay
-------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Vasil, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. 325
Thirnicbar, LLC, 406 Barmoose, LLC, 409 Bartoulouse, LLC, 407 Bar,
Inc., Twin Bar Management Corporation, David Desilva, John Mciver
and Mike Miciver Defendants, Case No. 19-cv-00540, (W.D. Tex., May
21, 2019), seeks to recover unpaid overtime wages, unlawfully kept
tips, liquidated damages and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs
under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Defendants are an enterprise consisting of four bars, Thirsty
Nickel, Toulouse, The Library and Mooseknucke Pub, on 6th Street in
Austin, Texas. Defendants employed Vasil as a bartender and later,
as a manager. During his work as a bartender, Vasil was a tipped
employee and required to participate in a tip pool, despite
spending more than 20% of their working time doing side work, such
as washing glasses and cleaning resulting in unpaid overtime and
unpaid minimum wages. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Charles L. Scalise, Esq.
      Daniel B. Ross, Esq.
      ROSS LAW GROUP
      1104 San Antonio Street
      Houston, TX 78701
      Tel: (512) 474-7677
      Fax: (512) 474-5306
      Email: Charles@rosslawpc.com


3M COMPANY: Short Seeks Damages Over Defective Earplug
------------------------------------------------------
Ronny Short, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiffs, v. 3M Company, Defendants, Case No.
19-cv-01514 (N.D. Ala., May 3, 2019), seeks to recover actual,
compensatory, consequential, incidental and punitive damages,
attorneys' fees, prejudgment and post-judgment interest, legal and
equitable relief resulting from negligence and for breach of
implied and express warranty.

Defendants sold dual-ended Combat Arms Earplugs to the US Armed
Forces for use as hearing protection for military personnel,
protecting against the disorienting effects of loud impulse noises
such as improvised explosive devices and gun fire, yet still allow
the service member to hear low-level noises critical to mission
safety such as commands, footsteps and encroaching enemies. It,
however, dislodges from the ear in a manner that is imperceptible
to the wearer. 3M settled a False Claims Act lawsuit with the
United States Government for over $9 million but has yet to remedy
the harm it caused to the tens of thousands of service members,
including Mr. Short, says the complaint.

3M Company is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of
business in St. Paul, Minnesota. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      D.G. Pantazis, Jr., Esq.
      WIGGINS CHILDS PANTAZIS FISHER & GOLDFARB, LLC
      The Kress Building
      301 19th Street N.
      Birmingham, AL 35203
      Tel: (205) 314-0500
      Email: dgpjr@wigginschilds.com


ACADEMY LTD: Diaz Asserts Violation of Disabilities Act
-------------------------------------------------------
Academy, LTD. is facing a class action lawsuit filed pursuant to
the Americans with Disabilities Act. The case is styled as Edwin
Diaz, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff v. Academy, LTD., Defendant, Case No. 1:19-cv-05733
(S.D. N.Y., June 19, 2019).

Academy, Ltd., doing business as Academy Sports + Outdoors, retails
sports, outdoor, and lifestyle products.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

   Joseph H Mizrahi, Esq.
   Cohen & Mizrahi LLP
   300 Cadman Plaza West, 12th Floor
   Brooklyn, NY 11201
   Tel: (929) 575-4175
   Fax: (929) 575-4195
   Email: joseph@cml.legal


ACCC INSURANCE: Ihrig Files Class Suit in Mississippi
-----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against ACCC Insurance
Company. The case is styled as Kristi Ihrig, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ACCC
Insurance Company, Defendant, Case No. 2:19-cv-00091-KS-MTP (C.D.
Miss., June 19, 2019).

The case type is stated as Diversity-Insurance Contract.[BN]

ACCC Insurance Company is an Insurance company in Houston,
Texas.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

   Brent Hazzard, Esq.
   HAZZARD LAW, LLC
   447 Northpark Drive
   Ridgeland, MS 39157
   Tel: (601) 977-5253
   Fax: (601) 977-5236
   Email: brent.hazzard@hazzardlaw.net



ALGENIST LLC: Diaz Alleges ADA Violation in New York
----------------------------------------------------
Algenist, LLC is facing a class action lawsuit filed pursuant to
the Americans with Disabilities Act. The case is styled as Edwin
Diaz, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff v. Algenist, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:19-cv-05745
(S.D. N.Y., June 19, 2019).

Algenist is a clinical beauty brand delivering anti-aging and color
correcting skincare products.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

   Joseph H Mizrahi, Esq.
   Cohen & Mizrahi LLP
   300 Cadman Plaza West, 12th Floor
   Brooklyn, NY 11201
   Tel: (929) 575-4175
   Fax: (929) 575-4195
   Email: joseph@cml.legal


AMER SPORTS: Figueroa Suit Alleges ADA Violation
------------------------------------------------
Jose Figueroa, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. Amer Sports Winter & Outdoor Company, Case No.
1:19-cv-03161 (S.D. N.Y., April 9, 2019), is brought against the
Defendant for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Plaintiff brings this civil rights action against Defendant for its
failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website,
www.salomon.com, to be fully accessible to and independently usable
by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired people,
therefore denying the visually impaired with full and equal access
to goods and services offered.

The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who
requires screen-reading software to read website content using his
computer.

Defendant is a clothing, footwear and accessories company, and owns
and operates the website, www.salomon.com, offering features which
should allow all consumers to access the goods and services and
which Defendant ensures the delivery of such goods throughout the
United States, including New York State. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Joseph H. Mizrahi, Esq.
      COHEN & MIZRAHI LLP
      300 Cadman Plaza West, 12th Fl.
      Brooklyn, NY 11201
      Tel: (929) 575-4175
      E-mail: Joseph@cml.legal


AMERICAN MEDICAL: Faces Oswald Suit Over LabCorp Data Breach
------------------------------------------------------------
ROBERT OSWALD, MARY BETH KERNS, MARCIA SORIN-ROSENTHAL and STEPHEN
ROSENTHAL, individually and on behalf of all those similarly
situated v. AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY, INC., and
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, Case No. 7:19-cv-05302
(S.D.N.Y., June 5, 2019), arises from a data breach announced by
LabCorp on June 4, 2019.

The Plaintiffs accuse the Defendants of failing to protect the
confidential information of millions of patients, including
financial information (e.g., credit card numbers and bank account
information), medical information, personal information (e.g.,
Social Security Numbers), and/or other protected health information
as defined by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act of 1996.  The Defendants' wrongful disclosure has harmed the
Plaintiffs and the Classes, believed to include millions of
individuals, the Plaintiffs allege.

American Medical Collection Agency, Inc., is a New York corporation
with its principal place of business in Elmsford, New York.  AMCA
is an external collection agency used by LabCorp and other
healthcare companies.

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings ("LabCorp") is a
Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in
Burlington, North Carolina.  LabCorp is one of the world's leading
providers of medical diagnostic testing services.  LabCorp performs
medical tests that aid in the diagnosis or detection of diseases,
and that measure the progress of or recovery from a disease.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Linda P. Nussbaum, Esq.
          Bart D. Cohen, Esq.
          NUSSBAUM LAW GROUP, P.C.
          1211 Avenue of the Americas, 40th Floor
          New York, NY 10036-8718
          Telephone: (917) 438-9189
          E-mail: lnussbaum@nussbaumpc.com
                  bcohen@nussbaumpc.com

               - and -

          Christopher A. Seeger, Esq.
          Jennifer Scullion, Esq.
          Parvin Aminolroaya, Esq.
          SEEGER WEISS LLP
          77 Water Street, 8th Floor
          New York, NY 10005
          Telephone: (212) 584-0700
          E-mail: cseeger@seegerweiss.com
                  jscullion@seegerweiss.com
                  paminolroaya@seegerweiss.com

               - and -

          Adam Frankel, Esq.
          GREENWICH LEGAL ASSOCIATES, LLC
          881 Lake Avenue
          Greenwich, CT 06831
          Telephone: (203) 622-6001
          E-mail: adam@grwlegal.com


ANDALOU NATURALS: Diaz Files Class Suit under ADA in New York
-------------------------------------------------------------
Andalou Naturals is facing a class action lawsuit filed pursuant to
the Americans with Disabilities Act. The case is styled as Edwin
Diaz, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff v. Andalou Naturals, Defendant, Case No. 1:19-cv-05748
(S.D. N.Y., June 19, 2019).

Andalou Naturals manufactures and distributes personal care
products. The Company offers cleansers, toners, shampoo,
conditioners, body lotions, hand creams, and shower gels. Andalou
Naturals markets its products worldwide.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

   Joseph H Mizrahi, Esq.
   Cohen & Mizrahi LLP
   300 Cadman Plaza West, 12th Floor
   Brooklyn, NY 11201
   Tel: (929) 575-4175
   Fax: (929) 575-4195
   Email: joseph@cml.legal


ANTHONY'S COAL: Lopez Suit Alleges FLSA and NYLL Violations
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fredi Lopez, Elvis Mejia Guzman, Sonia Montoya and Jairo Mejia,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v.
Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza of Woodbury, LLC, Anthony's Coal Fired
Pizza of Wantagh, LLC, and Phillip Dinatale and Joseph
Tuttoilmondo, Case No. 2:19-cv-02051 (E.D. N.Y., April 09, 2019),
is brought against the Defendants for violation of the Fair Labor
Standards Act and the New York Labor Law.

The Defendants willfully failed to provide wage statements and
failed to pay Plaintiffs minimum wage, spread of hour's
compensation, and overtime wages for hours worked in excess of
forty hours per week, says the complaint.

The Defendants own, manage and operate restaurants in New York. The
Plaintiffs were employed by the Defendants as cook, pizza maker,
waiter, stocker, dishwasher or food preparer and at the same time
performing other miscellaneous duties for the Defendants.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

      Roman Avshalumov, Esq.
      HELEN F. DALTON & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
      80-02 Kew Gardens Road, Suite 601
      Kew Gardens, NY 11415
      Tel: 718-263-9591
      Fax: 718-263-9598

APPLE MEDICAL: Fails to Pay Proper Overtime Wages, Li Claims
------------------------------------------------------------
ANNIE LI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. APPLE MEDICAL CENTER AND URGENT CARE, INC., a
California corporation, Case No. 5:19-cv-01020 (C.D. Cal., June 4,
2019), alleges that in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act,
the Plaintiff and class members regularly worked beyond 40 hours in
a workweek and eight hours in a workday but were not paid the
required overtime premiums for all overtime hours worked.

Apple Medical Center and Urgent Care, Inc., is a California
corporation, with its principal executive office and place of
business located in Hemet, California.

The Company provides medical care and urgent medical care services
to patients in California.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jean-Claude Lapuyade, Esq.
          JCL LAW FIRM, APC
          3990 Old Town Avenue, Suite C204
          San Diego, CA 92110
          Telephone: (619) 599-8292
          Facsimile: (619) 599-8291
          E-mail: jlapuyade@jcl-lawfirm.com

               - and -

          Kevin Stoops, Esq.
          Charles R. Ash, IV, Esq.
          SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C.
          One Towne Square, Suite 1700
          Southfield, MI 48076
          Telephone: (248) 355-0300
          Facsimile: (248) 436-8453
          E-mail: kstoops@sommerspc.com
                  cash@sommerspc.com


ASURION LLC: Diaz Alleges Violation under Disabilities Act
----------------------------------------------------------
Asurion, LLC is facing a class action lawsuit filed pursuant to the
Americans with Disabilities Act. The case is styled as Edwin Diaz,
on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff
v. Asurion, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:19-cv-05736 (S.D. N.Y., June
19, 2019).

Asurion, LLC is a privately held company based in Nashville,
Tennessee that provides insurance for smartphones, tablets,
consumer electronics, appliances, satellite receivers and jewelry.
In 2014, the company operated in 14 countries and had 49 offices
with 17,000 employees serving 280 million consumers.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

   Joseph H Mizrahi, Esq.
   Cohen & Mizrahi LLP
   300 Cadman Plaza West, 12th Floor
   Brooklyn, NY 11201
   Tel: (929) 575-4175
   Fax: (929) 575-4195
   Email: joseph@cml.legal



BATTERBEE ROOFING: Fails to Pay Laborers' Overtime, Monzalvo Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FELIX MONZALVO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. BATTERBEE ROOFING, INC., A Florida Profit Corporation,
Case No. 5:19-cv-00277-JSM-PRL (M.D. Fla., June 5, 2019), alleges
that the Defendant failed to pay the Plaintiff and other roofing
laborers for all overtime hours worked, in violation of the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

Batterbee Roofing, Inc., is a Florida for profit corporation.  The
Defendant operates a large scale roofing company in Ocala,
Florida.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Noah E. Storch, Esq.
          RICHARD CELLER LEGAL, P.A.
          10368 W. State Road 84, Suite 103
          Davie, FL 33324
          Telephone: (866) 344-9243
          Facsimile: (954) 337-2771
          E-mail: noah@floridaovertimelawyer.com


BATTERSON LLP: Miles Suit Seeks to Recover Overtime Pay Under FLSA
------------------------------------------------------------------
ROOSEVELT MILES v. BATTERSON, LLP, Case No. 4:19-cv-01998 (S.D.
Tex., June 4, 2019), is brought on behalf of the Plaintiff and all
others similarly situated seeking to recover alleged back pay,
unpaid overtime wages, lost wages, liquidated damages, interest,
costs, and attorney's fees pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards
Act.

Batterson, LLP, is a construction company providing a variety of
pavement marking, traffic control, and equipment sales and rental
services in Houston, Texas.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Terrence B. Robinson, Esq.
          Gabrielle O. Ilochi, Esq.
          TB ROBINSON LAW GROUP, PLLC
          7500 San Felipe St., Suite 800
          Telephone: (713) 568-1723
          Facsimile: (713) 965-4288
          Houston, TX 77063
          E-mail: TRobinson@TBRobinsonlaw.com
                  Gilochi@TBRobinsonlaw.com


BAYBRIDGE SZECHUAN: Fails to Pay Overtime Under FLSA, Lan Claims
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dounfuh Lan, individually and on behalf of all other employees
similarly situated v. Baybridge Szechuan Restaurant Inc. d/b/a
Baybridge Szechuan Restaurant, and Joseph Yu-Sing Chan, Case No.
1:19-cv-03350 (E.D.N.Y., June 5, 2019), alleges that the Defendants
have willfully and intentionally committed widespread violations of
the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law by engaging in
a pattern and practice of failing to pay their employees, including
the Plaintiff, compensation for all hours worked and overtime
compensation for all hours worked over 40 each workweek.

Baybridge Szechuan Restaurant Inc., doing business as Baybridge
Szechuan Restaurant, owns and operates a restaurant in Bayside
located at 208-06 Cross Island Parkway, in Bayside, New York.
Joseph Yu-Sing Chan is the owner, officer, director and/or managing
agent of Baybridge.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jiajing Fan, Esq.
          HANG & ASSOCIATES, PLLC.
          136-20 38th Ave., Suite 10G
          Flushing, NY 11354
          Telephone: (718) 353-8588
          E-mail: jfan@hanglaw.com


BLACKROCK CREDIT: Saba Seeks to Enforce Trust Shareholders' Rights
------------------------------------------------------------------
SABA CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LTD. v. BLACKROCK CREDIT ALLOCATION
INCOME TRUST, BLACKROCK NEW YORK MUNICIPAL BOND TRUST, BLACKROCK
ADVISORS, LLC, RICHARD E. CAVANAGH, KAREN P. ROBARDS, MICHAEL J.
CASTELLANO, CYNTHIA L. EGAN, FRANK J. FABOZZI, HENRY GABBAY, R.
GLENN HUBBARD, W. CARL KESTER, CATHERINE A. LYNCH, ROBERT
FAIRBAIRN, and JOHN M. PERLOWSKI, Case No. 2019-0416- (Del. Ch.,
June 4, 2019), is brought on behalf of the Plaintiff and all others
similarly situated seeking to enforce the franchise rights of the
BlackRock Trusts' shareholders and to remedy, among other things,
the Board of Directors' alleged inequitable, unreasonable and
arbitrary and capricious application of bylaws with respect to
nominations to the Board by shareholders.

BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust is a Delaware statutory
trust that is registered as a closed-end investment company under
the federal Investment Company Act of 1940.  BTZ is headquartered
in New York City.  BTZ was formerly known as BlackRock Preferred &
Equity Advantage Trust.  BlackRock New York Municipal Bond Trust is
a Delaware statutory trust that is registered as a closed-end
investment company under the federal Investment Company Act of
1940.

BlackRock Advisors, LLC, is a limited liability company organized
under the laws of the state of Delaware, and is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc.  BlackRock created the BlackRock
Trusts, sold shares of the BlackRock Trusts to the public, and
manages the BlackRock Trusts, together with over a hundred other
registered investment companies known as the "BlackRock Fixed
Income Complex," pursuant to advisory agreements entered into by
the Trustees with the Advisor.  The Individual Defendants serve as
trustees of the BlackRock Trusts.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Carmella P. Keener, Esq.
          ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT & GODDESS, P.A.
          919 N. Market Street, Suite 1401
          Citizens Bank Center
          Wilmington, DE 19801
          Telephone: (302) 656-4433
          E-mail: ckeener@rmgglaw.com

               - and -

          Carol S. Shahmoon, Esq.
          Gregory E. Keller, Esq.
          SHAHMOON KELLER PLLC
          One Great Neck Road, Suite 7
          Great Neck, NY 11021
          Telephone: (646) 517-4399
          E-mail: cshahmoon@shahmoonkeller.com
                  gkeller@shahmoonkeller.com


BROOKLYN BORN: Millin Seeks to Recover Overtime Under FLSA & NYLL
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DARNELL MILLIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. BROOKLYN BORN CHOCOLATE, LLC, THEOBROMA CHOCOLATES,
LLC, MICHAEL ALTMAN individually, and JEAN-FRANCOIS BONNET
individually, Case No. 1:19-cv-03346 (E.D.N.Y., June 5, 2019),
seeks to recover overtime compensation and other damages under the
Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law.

Brooklyn Born Chocolate, LLC, is a domestic business corporation
organized and existing under the laws of New York.  Theobroma
Chocolates, LLC is a domestic business corporation organized and
existing under the laws of New York.  The Individual Defendants own
and operate the Corporate Defendants.

The Defendants sell private label chocolate products.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Brian S. Schaffer, Esq.
          Hunter G Benharris, Esq.
          FIT APELLI & SCHAFFER, LLP
          28 Liberty Street, 30th Floor
          New York, NY 10005
          Telephone: (212) 300-0375
          E-mail: bschaffer@fslawfirm.com


CHICAGO, IL: Brown Suit Alleges Consumer Fraud Act Violation
------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Brown, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly
situated individuals  v. City of Chicago, Case No. 1:19-cv-02411
(N.D. Ill., April 09, 2019), is brought against the Defendant for
violation of the U.S. Constitution Article IV, Quo Warranto and
Illinois Consumer Fraud Act.

The Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of a class, consisting
of all persons who are or were the owners of a motor vehicle
registered pursuant to the law of a State that does or did not
require the display of a license plate on the front of their
vehicle and who were issued a violation notice by the Defendant.

The Plaintiff is a resident and citizen of the State of Michigan.
The Plaintiff is the registered owner of certain motor vehicles
registered in a state other than the State of Illinois.

The Defendant is a home-rule, municipal corporation, organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Illinois. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Glen J. Dunn, Jr., Esq.
      GLEN J. DUNN & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
      121 West Wacker Drive, Suite 1414
      Chicago, IL 60601
      Tel: (312) 880-1010


CR ENGLAND: Virgne Sues Over Illegal SMS Ad Blasts
--------------------------------------------------
Derrick Virgne, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. C.R. England, Inc., Defendant, Case No.
19-cv-02011, (S.D. Ind., May 21, 2019), seeks injunctive and
declaratory relief, statutory damages and treble damages, and an
award of attorneys' fees and costs for violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act.

CRE is a transportation company that operates a number of truck
driving schools across the country. Virgne claims that they send
unsuspecting consumers with automated text messages, even after the
recipients replying "STOP" to opt-out of receiving said messages.
[BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Amy Cueller, Esq.
      LEMBERG LAW, LLC
      43 Danbury Road, 3rd Floor
      Wilton, CT 06897
      Telephone: (203) 653-2250
      Facsimile: (203) 653-3424


CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH: Beck Suit Alleges FLSA Violation
-----------------------------------------------------
Shavanda Beck, Tracy D. Reid, Revell Whitney, and Melchezidek K.
Muhammad, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly
situated v. County of Cuyahoga, Case No. 1:19-cv-00818 (N.D. Ohio,
April 12, 2019), is brought against the Defendant for violation of
the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage
Standards Act.

The Plaintiffs and other similarly situated individuals regularly
work in excess of 40 hours per week, exclusive of scheduled
overtime shifts. However, the Defendants calculated these overtime
hours as part of their regular earnings and did not include them as
part of Plaintiffs' overtime earnings, says the complaint.

The Plaintiffs are residents of the State of Ohio and were employed
by the Defendant for its Juvenile Court Division in hourly
non-exempt positions, at its Juvenile Detention Center, located at
9300 Quincy Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106.

The Defendant hires activities assistant, cook, custodial worker,
detention clerk, detention officer, food service worker and lead
detention clerk for its Juvenile Court Division. The Plaintiffs
were employed by the Defendant for its Juvenile Court Division in
hourly non-exempt positions, at its Juvenile Detention Center.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

      Frank Consolo, Esq.
      Horace F. Consolo, Esq.
      CONSOLO LAW FIRM CO., LPA
      212 Hoyt Block
      700 West St. Clair Avenue
      Cleveland, OH 44113
      Tel: (216) 696-5400
      Fax: (216) 696-2610
      E-mail: fconsolo@consololaw.com
              hconsolo@consololaw.com


DANIEL AUSTIN: Nelson Files Class Suit in Colorado
--------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Daniel Austin Walzl.
The case is styled as Brett Andrew Nelson also known as: Brett
Andrew of the House of Nelson as an Individual and on behalf of all
other similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Daniel Austin Walzl as a
man, privately, Defendant, Case No. 1:19-cv-01772 (D. Colo., June
19, 2019).

The lawsuit arises pursuant to the Civil Rights Act.

The Defendant is a private person.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears PRO SE.



DELUXE GREEN: Tem Sues Over Unpaid Overtime
-------------------------------------------
Eva Baten Tem, on behalf of themselves, FLSA Collective Plaintiffs
and the Class, Plaintiff, v. Deluxe Green Bo Inc. and Angela (last
name unknown), Defendants, Case No. 19-cv-04685, (S.D. N.Y., May
21, 2019), seeks to recover unpaid overtime, compensation for
retaliation, liquidated damages, statutory penalties and attorneys'
fees and costs pursuant to New York Labor Law and the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

Defendants operate a restaurant located at 66 Bayard Street, New
York, NY 10013 where Tem was hired by Defendants to work as a cook.
She regularly worked six days per week, for a total of 54 hours per
week yet was paid a fixed weekly salary without any overtime
compensation, the complaint relates. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      C.K. Lee, Esq.
      Anne Seelig, Esq.
      LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC
      30 East 39th Street, Second Floor
      New York, NY 10016
      Tel: (212) 465-1188
      Fax: (212) 465-1181


DINEINFRESH INC: Olsen Files Class Suit under ADA in New York
-------------------------------------------------------------
Dineinfresh Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit filed pursuant to
the Americans with Disabilities Act. The case is styled as Thomas
J. Olsen, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. Dineinfresh Inc. doing business as: Plated,
Defendant, Case No. 1:19-cv-05757 (S.D. N.Y., June 19, 2019).

DineInFresh, Inc., doing business as Plated, retails chef-designed
recipes and ingredients online in the continental United States. It
offers meat and fish, and vegetarian dishes, as well as divided
shallots, garlic, divided scallions, mints, basils, divided limes,
ground pork, mayonnaises, fish sauces, sugar, baguettes, and
shredded carrots.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

   Douglas Brian Lipsky, Esq.
   Lipsky Lowe LLP
   630 Third Avenue Fifth Floor
   New York, NY 10017
   Tel: (212) 392-4772
   Fax: (212) 444-1030
   Email: doug@lipskylowe.com


DYNAMIC RECOVERY: Zavinskiy Files Class Suit under FDCPA
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Dynamic Recovery
Solutions, LLC. The case is styled as Vladimir Zavinskiy,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC and Does 1 through 10,
inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 2:19-cv-02661-JS (E.D. Pen., June
19, 2019).

Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC is a full-service collection agency
based in South Carolina.[BN]

The docket of the case states the nature of suit as Consumer Credit
filed pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

   Arkady Eric Rayz, Esq.
   Kalikhman & Rayz LLC
   1051 county line road, Suite A
   Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006
   Tel: (215) 364-5030
   Fax: (215) 364-5029
   Email: erayz@kalraylaw.com



ESTENSON LOGISTICS: Parsons Labor Suit Removed to E.D. California
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit captioned ROBERT PARSONS, as an individual
and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. ESTENSON
LOGISTICS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive, Case No. 34-2019-00252929, was removed on
June 5, 2019, from the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of Sacramento to the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of California.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:19-at-00458 to the
proceeding.

On March 21, 2019, Plaintiff Robert Parsons filed his Class Action
Complaint in the Superior Court alleging four causes of action: (1)
Violation of Cal. Labor Code (Sections 226.7 and 512; (2) Violation
of Cal. Labor Code Section 226.7; (3) Violation of Labor Code
Section 226(a); and (4) Violation of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code Section
17200.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Larry W. Lee, Esq.
          Max W. Gavron, Esq.
          DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, P.C.
          515 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1250
          Los Angeles, CA 90071
          Telephone: (213) 488-6555
          Facsimile: (213) 488-6554
          E-mail: lwlee@diversitylaw.com
                  mgavron@diversitylaw.com

               - and -

          William L. Marder, Esq.
          POLARIS LAW GROUP LLP
          501 San Benito Street, Suite 200
          Hollister, CA 95023
          Telephone: (831) 531-4214
          Facsimile: (831) 634-0333
          E-mail: bill@polarislawgroup.com

Defendant ESTENSON LOGISTICS, LLC, is represented by:

          Michael J. Nader, Esq.
          Daniel E. Richardson, Esq.
          OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
          500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2500
          Sacramento, CA 95814
          Telephone: (916) 840-3150
          Facsimile: (916) 840-3159
          E-mail: michael.nader@ogletreedeakins.com
                  daniel.richardson@ogletree.com


EXACT SCIENCES: Arcare Suit Alleges TCPA Breach
-----------------------------------------------
Arcare, Inc. dba Arcare Carlisle, on behalf of itself and all
others similarly situated v. Exact Sciences Laboratories, LLC, Case
No. N19C-04-092 (Del. Super. Ct., April 09, 2019), is brought
against the Defendant for violations of the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act.

The Defendant's policy and practice of faxing unsolicited and
unwanted advertisements to the Plaintiff and others similarly
situated violates the TCPA, notes the complaint.

The Plaintiff is an Arkansas non-profit corporation that does
business in Carlisle, Lonoke County, Arkansas. The Plaintiff has
received multiple fax advertisements from the Defendant without
prior express permission.

The Defendant is a Delaware Limited Liability Company that sent fax
messages advertising the commercial availability of "Cologuard,"
the Defendant's prescription-only product used to screen patients
for colorectal cancer. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

      Blake A. Bennett, Esq.
      Christopher H. Lee, Esq.
      COOCH AND TAYLOR, P.A.
      The Brandywine Building
      1000 West Street, 10th Floor
      Wilmington, DE 19801
      Tel: (302) 984-3800
      E-mail: bbennett@coochtaylor.com
              clee@coochtaylor.com


EXPLORE GROUP: Sostaita Seeks Unpaid Overtime Pay
-------------------------------------------------
Marcelo Sostaita, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Explore Group, LLC and Carter National
Logistics, LLC, Defendants, Case No. 19-cv-00127 (E.D. Ark., May
21, 2019), seeks to recover monetary damages, liquidated damages,
prejudgment interest, and costs, including reasonable attorneys'
fees as a result of failure to pay overtime wages as required by
the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act.

Explore Group and Carter National Logistics provide transportation
and logistics services and employs haulers and contracts with other
transportation and logistics companies. Sostaita worked as a Sand
Hauler for the Defendants and was misclassified as an exempt
independent contractor and denied overtime pay for hours rendered
in excess of 40 hours per week. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Josh Sanford, Esq.
      SANFORD LAW FIRM
      Post Office Box 39
      Russellville, AR 72811
      Tel: (479) 880-0088
      Fax: (888) 787-2040
      Email: josh@sanfordlawfirm.com


F & B ASSOCIATES: Fails to Properly Pay Workers, Ghigliazza Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
Anthony Ghigliazza, as an individual and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. F & B Associates, Inc. and Does 1 through 50,
Case No. CGC-19-575205 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., April
11, 2019), is brought against the Defendants for violations of the
California Labor Code.

The Defendants failed to provide accurate itemized wage statements
and failed to pay wages on a weekly basis.

The Plaintiff is a current temporary services employee of the
Defendant. The Plaintiff has been employed by the Defendant since
about October 2018. The Plaintiff is assigned and sent to work on
various assignments at Defendant's clients' sites.

The Defendant operates a catering company and provides food and
beverage catering services at private and public events for its
clients located throughout the United States, including in the
State of California. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Larry W. Lee, Esq.
      Mai Tulyathan, Esq.
      DIVERSITY LAW GROUP
      515 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1250
      Los Angeles, CA 90071
      Tel: (213) 488-6555
      Fax: (213) 488-6554


FACEBOOK INC: Class Action Suit Over Robocalls Reinstated
---------------------------------------------------------
Bob Egelko, writing for San Francisco Chronicle, reports that a
federal appeals court has reinstated a class-action lawsuit against
Facebook for allegedly using an auto-dialing system to send
unwanted robocalls, a practice barred by federal law.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco rejected
Facebook's arguments that the ban did not apply to the text
messages its equipment sent to a non-Facebook user, and that the
law, passed in 1991, violated freedom of speech.

The court went a step further on June 13 by declaring
unconstitutional a 2015 congressional amendment that allowed
uninvited robocalls whose purpose was to collect a debt owed to, or
guaranteed by, a federal agency.

"An unconsented, non-emergency robocall thoroughly invades personal
and residential privacy, whether it is placed to collect government
debt or for some other purpose," Judge M. Margaret McKeown said in
the 3-0 ruling.

She said the exemption -- which would include auto-dialed calls to
collect mortgages or student loans backed by the government -- was
unconstitutionally based on the content of the calls. Another
federal appeals court, in Richmond, Va., reached the same
conclusion in a separate case in April.

Facebook also argued that its text messages, warning customers that
someone had accessed their account, were not meant to be prohibited
by a law against unwanted robocalls. But the court said the purpose
of the law -- "protecting privacy by restricting unsolicited,
automated telephone calls" -- applies to the texts cited in the
lawsuit, which somehow were sent to the cell phone of a
non-Facebook member.

The ruling is "an important decision that protects consumer
privacy," said Sergei Lemberg, Esq. lawyer for the plaintiff, Noah
Duguid of Stevensville, Mont. The case was heard by a judge in San
Francisco because Facebook is headquartered in Menlo Park.

SUBSCRIBER BENEFIT

Did you know you have 10% off at San Francisco Wine School?

There was no immediate comment from Facebook or its lawyers. In
court filings, the lawyers said the 1991 law was not intended "to
hold companies like Facebook liable to the tune of potentially
hundreds of millions of dollars for their efforts to protect their
users' privacy and security."

Duguid said he received the first text messages in January 2014,
saying someone had accessed his Facebook account, an account that
did not exist. He said he emailed a complaint to Facebook three
months later and got an automated response. In October 2014, he
said, he replied to another message by texting the word "off," and
Facebook responded that its texts were now off, but the messages
resumed later that day. [GN]


FASHION NOVA: Johnson Sues Over Unsolicited Text Messages
---------------------------------------------------------
KAREN JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. FASHION NOVA, INC., a California
corporation, Defendant, Case No. 3:19-cv-03505 (N.D. Cal., June 19,
2019) is a Class Action Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial against
Defendant to stop Fashion Nova from violating the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act, and to otherwise obtain injunctive and
monetary relief for all persons injured by Fashion Nova's conduct.

Part of Fashion Nova's marketing plan includes sending text
messages en masse to consumers regarding promotions that direct
consumers to purchase clothing from FashionNova.com. Unfortunately,
such text messages are sent using an autodialer without the
necessary express written consent. To make matters worse, consumers
are receiving multiple text messages, regardless of whether they
have their phone numbers registered on the Do Not Call registry. In
Plaintiff's case, she received at least 2 autodialed text messages
to her cellular phone from Defendant directing her to purchase
items from FashionNova.com. In response to these text messages,
Plaintiff files this class action lawsuit seeking injunctive
relief, requiring Fashion Nova to cease sending of unsolicited,
autodialed text messages to consumers' cellular telephone numbers,
and to other phone numbers registered on the DNC, as well as an
award of statutory damages to the members of the Classes, says the
complaint.

Plaintiff Johnson is a Concord, California resident.

Fashion Nova operates 5 retail locations in California and operates
an online retail store at FashionNova.com.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     David S. Ratner, Esq.
     David Ratner Law Firm, LLP
     33 Julianne Court
     Walnut Creek, CA 94595

          - and -

     Rachel Kaufman, Esq.
     KAUFMAN P.A.
     400 NW 26th Street
     Miami, FL 33127
     Phone: (305) 469-5881
     Email: rachel@kaufmanpa.com


FIRST AMERICAN: Fails to Protect Customers' PII, Mohr Suit Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------------
JACQUELINE MOHR, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated v. FIRST AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION and FIRST AMERICAN
TITLE COMPANY, Case No. 8:19-cv-01102 (C.D. Cal., June 4, 2019),
alleges that the Defendants have neglected their duty and allowed
access their customers' personally identifiable information
("PII"), including bank account numbers, Social Security numbers,
financial and tax records, and images of drivers' licenses.

First American Financial Corporation is incorporated under the laws
of the state of Delaware with its principal place of business and
headquarters located in the City of Santa Ana, California.  First
American Title Company is a California corporation with its
principal place of business in Santa Ana.

First American is the largest title insurance company in the United
States with an estimated $5.3 billion per year in revenue derived
from title insurance and other real estate closing services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Geoff J. Spreter, Esq.
          Benjamin D. Petiprin, Esq.
          SPRETER & PETIPRIN, APC
          601 3rd Street
          Coronado, CA 92118
          Telephone: (619) 865-7986
          E-mail: geoff@spreterlaw.com
                  ben@spreterpetiprin.com


GLOBAL CONTACT: Agresti Sues Over Unpaid Spread-of-Hours Wages
--------------------------------------------------------------
PAUL AGRESTI and SONIA SANTOS, individually and on behalf of others
similarly situated v. GLOBAL CONTACT SERVICES, LLC, Case No.
653274/2019 (N.Y. Sup., New York Cty., June 4, 2019), alleges that
the Defendant failed to pay the Plaintiffs and the class the
required daily spread-of-hours compensation pursuant to the New
York Labor Law.

Global Contact Services, LLC, is a Delaware Limited Liability
Company.  The Company is a registered foreign LLC that maintains
its principal place of business in Long Island City, New York.

GCS provides call center services to the New York City Transit
Authority ("NYCTA").  GCS currently employs some 600 to 700
individuals who, in part, answer calls and arrange for passenger
pickups.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Arthur Z. Schwartz, Esq.
          Richard Soto, Esq.
          ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE, CHARTERED ATTORNEYS
          225 Broadway, Suite 1902
          New York, NY 10007
          Telephone: (212) 285-1400
          E-mail: aschwartz@afjlaw.com
                  rsoto@afjlaw.com


GLOBAL RADAR: Accused by Job Suit of Violating FCRA
---------------------------------------------------
JUSTIN JOB, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
v. GLOBAL RADAR ACQUISITION, LLC, d.b.a. GLOBAL HR RESEARCH, a
foreign limited liability company , f.k.a. RADAR POST CLOSING
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. f.k.a., GLOBAL HR RESEARCH, INC. and DOES 1
through 10, Inclusive, Case No. 3:19-cv-03103 (N.D. Cal., June 4,
2019), accuses the Defendants of violating the Fair Credit
Reporting Act.

Mr. Job contends that Global Radar's FCRA form is unlawful on two
separate grounds: the FCRA form violates the standalone document
requirement, and it violates the "clear and conspicuous disclosure"
requirement.

The Global Radar entities are providers of human resource materials
and support for hundreds of businesses nationwide and in the state
of California.  Global Radar also provides credit, consumer and
criminal background checks ("consumer reports") and provides such
services to companies like Herman Integration Services, LLC, where
the Plaintiff sought employment.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Timothy D. Cohelan, Esq.
          Michael D. Singer, Esq.
          J. Jason Hill, Esq.
          COHELAN KHOURY & SINGER
          605 C Street, Suite 200
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (619) 595-3001
          Facsimile: (619) 595-3000
          E-mail: tcohelan@ckslaw.com
                  msinger@ckslaw.com
                  jhill@ckslaw.com

               - and -

          Ian Pancer, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICE OF IAN PANCER
          105 West F St., 4th Floor
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (619) 955-6644
          Facsimile: (619) 374-7410
          E-mail: ian@sandiegolegal.net


GREENLIGHT ENERGY: Sells Overpriced Electricity, Williams Suit Says
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Williams, an individual and others similarly situated,
Plaintiff, v. Greenlight Energy Inc., Defendant, Case No.
708394/2019, (N.Y. Sup., May 13, 2019), seeks redress for the
deceptive and bad faith pricing practices of the Defendant in that
it overprices its electricity in breach of contract and in
violation of New York General Business Law.

Greenlight is an independent energy company who buys electricity at
wholesale for resale to retail customers in New York. Greenlight
allegedly lures consumers into switching energy suppliers with
promises that it offers market-based variable rates for electricity
despite the fact that its "variable" rates are substantially higher
than those otherwise available in the energy market.

Brian Williams is a citizen of New York residing in Shandaken, New
York. Mr. Williams was a customer of Greenlight from approximately
March 2014 through February 2019. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jonathan Shub, Esq.
      Kevin Laukaitis, Esq.
      KOHN, SWIFT & GRAF, P.C.
      1600 Market Street, Suite 2500
      Philadelphia, PA 19103
      Tel: (215) 238-1700
      Email: jshub@kohnswift.com
             klaukaitis@kohnswift.com

             - and -

      Daniel K. Bryson, Esq.
      WHITFIELD BRYSON &MASON LLP
      900 W. Morgan Street
      Raleigh, NC 27603
      Tel: (919) 600-5000
      Fax: (919) 600-5035
      Email: dan@wbmllp.com

             - and -

      Gregory F. Coleman, Esq.
      GREG COLEMAN LAW PC
      First Tennessee Plaza
      800 S. Gay Street, Suite 1100
      Knoxville, TN 37929
      Tel: (865) 247-0080
      Email: greg@gregcolemanlaw.com


GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY: Diaz Asserts Breach of ADA in New York
----------------------------------------------------------
Griffin Technology, LLC is facing a class action lawsuit filed
pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act. The case is styled
as Edwin Diaz, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. Griffin Technology, LLC, Defendant, Case No.
1:19-cv-05737 (S.D. N.Y., June 19, 2019).

Griffin Technology, Inc. designs, manufactures, and delivers
accessories for personal computing and digital media markets
worldwide. It offers products for various applications, such as
computer, TV, stereo system, MP3 players, musical instruments, FM
transmitters, and wireless sound systems. The company offers its
products through retailers and online in the Americas, Europe, and
Asia. Griffin Technology, Inc. was founded in 1992 and is based in
Nashville, Tennessee. As of August 5, 2016, Griffin Technology,
Inc. operates as a subsidiary of Incipio Group.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

   Joseph H Mizrahi, Esq.
   Cohen & Mizrahi LLP
   300 Cadman Plaza West, 12th Floor
   Brooklyn, NY 11201
   Tel: (929) 575-4175
   Fax: (929) 575-4195
   Email: joseph@cml.legal

GRUBHUB INC: Marshall Seeks to Block Future Nonconsensual Calls
---------------------------------------------------------------
DONNA MARSHALL, individually and on behalf of others similarly
situated v. GRUBHUB INC., Case No. 1:19-cv-03718 (N.D. Ill., June
4, 2019), is brought for money damages to secure redress for
Grubhub's alleged nonconsensual, computerized-voice calls to the
Plaintiff's and others' cellular telephone numbers, and to enjoin
future nonconsensual calls pursuant to the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act.

Grubhub has called her cellular telephone number dozens, or
possibly even hundred of times, effectively preventing her from
using her phone, and clogging up her voice mail, the Plaintiff
alleges.

Grubhub Inc. is a corporation headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.
Grubhub is the nation's leading online and mobile food-ordering and
delivery marketplace with the largest and most comprehensive
network of restaurant partners, as well as the largest diner base.
Grubhub works with more than 115,000 restaurant partners in over
2,200 U.S. cities and London.  The Grubhub portfolio of brands
includes Grubhub, Seamless, LevelUp, Tapingo, AllMenus and
MenuPages.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Alexander H. Burke, Esq.
          Daniel J. Marovitch, Esq.
          BURKE LAW OFFICES, LLC
          155 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 9020
          Chicago, IL 60601
          Telephone: (312) 729-5288
          E-mail: aburke@burkelawllc.com
                  dmarovitch@burkelawllc.com

               - and -

          James M. Feagle, Esq.
          Clifton Dorsen, Esq.
          SKAAR & FEAGLE, LLP
          2374 Main Street, Suite B
          Tucker, GA 30084
          Telephone: (404) 373-1970
          E-mail: jfeagle@skaarandfeagle.com
                  cdorsen@skaarandfeagle.com

               - and -

          Justin T. Holcombe, Esq.
          Kris K. Skaar, Esq.
          SKAAR & FEAGLE, LLP
          133 Mirramont Lake Drive
          Woodstock, GA 30189
          Telephone: (770) 427-5600
          E-mail: jholcombe@skaarandfeagle.com
                  kskaar@skaarandfeagle.com


HEALTH INSURANCE: Removes Parker RICO Suit to S.D. Florida
----------------------------------------------------------
The Defendants removed on June 5, 2019, the class action lawsuit
titled PATRICIA PARKER, and ABIGAIL SAYO, Individually and On
Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated v. HEALTH INSURANCE
INNOVATIONS, INC., and HEALTH PLAN INTERMEDIARIES HOLDINGS, LLC,
Case No. 2019-012082-CA-01, from the Circuit Court of the Eleventh
Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, to the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:19-cv-22316-KMW to the
proceeding.

On April 19, 2019, Plaintiffs Patricia Parker and Abigail Sayo
filed a Class Action Complaint for Violations of Florida RICO Act
and Other Claims (the "Complaint") against the Defendants.  The
Complaint asserts putative class action claims for alleged
violations of the Florida RICO Act (Count I), conspiracy to commit
fraud (Count II), fraud (Count III), aiding and abetting breach of
fiduciary duty (Count IV), and failure to procure (Count V).[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jeffrey R. Sonn, Esq.
          SONN LAW GROUP
          One Turnberry Place
          19495 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 607
          Aventura, FL 33180
          Telephone: (305) 912-3000
          E-mail: jsonn@sonnlaw.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Garry W. O'Donnell, Esq.
          GREENSPOON MARDER LLP
          2255 Glades Road, Suite 400-E
          Boca Raton, FL 33431
          Telephone: (561) 994-2212
          Facsimile: (561) 807-7527
          E-mail: garry.odonnell@gmlaw.com


HIPNATION OPERATIONS: Sent Unsolicited Text Ads, Acosta Suit Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Marlon Acosta, on behalf of himself and other persons similarly
situated v. Hipnation Operations & Solutions LLC and Access America
Group,LLC, Case No. 2:19-cv-09315 (E.D. La., April 11, 2019), is
brought against the Defendants for violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act.

The Defendants violated the TCPA by sending telemarketing and or
advertising text messages to the Plaintiff's cellular phone without
obtaining requisite consent.

The Plaintiff is a natural person and resident of the State of
Louisiana. The Plaintiff received a telemarketing text message on
his cellular phone from Defendants using an automatic telephone
dialing system.

The Defendant Hipnation provides a for-profit service that serves
as an alternative to traditional health insurance.

The Defendant AccessAmerica provides marketing and technical
services to businesses. The Defendant HipNation retained
AccessAmerica to provide text message marketing services. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jonathan Mille Kirkland, Esq.
      Roberto Luis Costales, Esq.
      William H. Beaumont, Esq.
      BEAUMONT COSTALES LLC
      3801 Canal Street, Suite 207
      New Orleans, LA 70119
      Tel: (504) 534-5005
      E-mail: jmk@beaumontcostales.com


I.Q. DATA: Smilowitz Hits Confusing Collection Letter
-----------------------------------------------------
Yoel Smilowitz, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly
situated persons, Plaintiffs, v. I.Q. Data International, Inc.,
Defendant, Case No. 19-cv-03002, (E.D. N.Y., May 21, 2019), seeks
actual and statutory damages, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees
under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

I.C. System, Inc. is in the business of the collection of debts
allegedly owed by consumers. It attempted to collect from Smilowitz
an alleged defaulted financial obligation with a past-due balance
with an offer of settlement. Smilowitz claims that the collection
letter contains multiple addresses thus creating confusion as to
where to dispute the debt in writing. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Craig B. Sanders, Esq.
      BARSHAY SANDERS, PLLC
      100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 500
      Garden City, NY 11530
      Tel: (516) 203-7600
      Fax: (516) 706-5055
      Email: ConsumerRights@BarshaySanders.com


INCLAN PAINTING: Painters Seek Unpaid Overtime Wages
----------------------------------------------------
Osvaldo Souffront, Jeffry Souffront, and other similarly situated
individuals, Plaintiffs, v. Inclan Painting and Waterproofing,
Corp., Luis Inclan and Babar Inclan, Defendants, Case No.
19-cv-22044, (S.D. Fla., May 21, 2019) seeks to recover unpaid
overtime compensation, as well as an additional amount as
liquidated damages, costs and reasonable attorneys' fees under the
Fair Labor Standards Act.

Defendants operate a construction company where Plaintiffs worked
as painters. They claim to have worked approximately an average of
60-67 hours per week without being paid overtime compensation.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      R. Martin Saenz, Esq.
      SAENZ & ANDERSON, PLLC
      20900 NE 30th Avenue, Ste. 800
      Aventura, FL 33180
      Telephone: (305) 503-5131
      Facsimile: (888) 270-5549
      Email: msaenz@saenzanderson.com


INTEGON PREFERRED: Washington Suit Asserts Breach of Contract
-------------------------------------------------------------
Dana Washington, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Integon Preferred Insurance Company,
Defendants, Case No. 19-cv-00950 (M.D. Fla., May 21, 2019), asserts
a claim for breach of contract based on Defendant's failure to
include sales tax, title transfer fees and tag transfer fees when
making payment to its insureds after the total loss of an insured
vehicle, notwithstanding its contractual obligation to do so.

Washington is under an automobile policy issued for auto physical
damage, including comprehensive and collision coverage, which
requires payment of an "Actual Cash Value" together with mandatory
regulatory taxes, costs and fees in order to replace the vehicle.
Integon Preferred Insurance systematically underpays amounts it
owes its insureds concerning total loss vehicles insured with
comprehensive and collision coverage and also fails to include
title transfer fees, tag transfer fees, and/or sales taxes when
making payment to its insureds after the total loss of an insured
vehicle.

Integon is an auto insurance carrier operating in Florida offering
comprehensive and collision coverage. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Andrew John Shamis
      SHAMIS & GENTILE, PA
      Suite 1205, 14 NE 1st Ave.
      Miami, FL 33132
      Tel: (305) 479-2299
      Fax: (786) 623-0915
      Email: ashamis@sflinjuryattorneys.com

             - and -

      Rachel Dapeer, Esq.
      DAPEER LAW, P.A.
      300 S. Biscayne Blvd, #2704
      Miami, FL 33131
      Telephone: (305) 610-5223

             - and -

      Edmund A. Normand, Esq.
      Jacob Phillips, Esq.
      NORMAND PLLC
      3165 McCrory Place, Suite 175
      Orlando, FL 32803
      Tel: (407) 603-6031
      Email: ed@ednormand.com
             jacob.phillips@normandpllc.com

             - and -

      Scott Adam Edelsberg
      EDELSBERG LAW, PA
      2875 NE 191st Street, Suite 703
      Aventura, FL 33180
      Tel: (305) 975-3320
      Email: scott@edelsberglaw.com


IOWA: Experts Decry Use of Restraints at School
-----------------------------------------------
KCRG-TV9 News Staff reports that two psychiatric experts testifying
in a lawsuit against the Iowa Human Services Department said the
use of isolation and restraints at the state school for delinquent
boys can cause them long-lasting psychological harm.

Psychologist Andrea Weisman testified in U.S. District Court in Des
Moines that a Velcro and leather contraption called "the wrap" used
to restrain boys at the State Training School for Boys in Eldora is
"akin to a torture device."

But state officials testified that the measures are used only as
last resorts to protect the safety of students and staff members
when boys become agitated and violent.

The class-action lawsuit filed in November 2017 by two advocacy
groups says the school fails to provide adequate mental health care
to the boys. Judge Stephanie Rose is overseeing the nonjury trial
and will decide whether changes should be ordered. The plaintiffs
aren't seeking monetary damages.

The Des Moines Register reported that Weisman and psychologist
Stuart Grassian testified that many states have stopped using
solitary confinement and restraints at facilities for troubled
teens, making the facilities safer because the students are less
agitated.

Many of the delinquent teens have histories of mental illness
caused by childhood abuse and neglect, Weisman and Grassian said.
Isolation and restraint can retrigger the damage from previous
traumas, making the boys lose control, the two testified.

The school administrators "need to understand that kids may not
just be misbehaving — they may be sick," Weisman said.

Administrators testified that the facility tries to minimize the
use of restraints and isolation.

Human Services Department Director called the Eldora facility
school "the placement of last resort" for boys who have committed
serious crimes and have failed to succeed at less-restrictive
programs.

The school superintendent since 2008, Mark Day, testified on June
13 that he and his staff strive to make the facility feel more like
a campus than a prison.

He grew emotional when talking about the Christmas breakfast he and
his family serve boys unable to go home for the holiday.

"It's hard to be vilified when you know what's really going on,"
Day told Rose. [GN]


IQ DATA: Riesel Disputes Amount of Alleged Debt Owed
----------------------------------------------------
Jessica Riesel, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly
situated persons, Plaintiffs, v. I.Q. Data International, Inc.,
Defendant, Case No. 19-cv-04692, (S.D. N.Y., May 21, 2019), seeks
actual and statutory damages, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees
under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

I.Q. Data is in the business of collecting debts allegedly owed by
consumers. It attempted to collect from Riesel an allegedly
defaulted financial obligation with a past-due balance with an
offer of settlement. Riesel disputes the $11,101.01 that I.Q. Data
is attempting to collect. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Craig B. Sanders, Esq.
      BARSHAY SANDERS, PLLC
      100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 500
      Garden City, NY 11530
      Tel: (516) 203-7600
      Fax: (516) 706-5055
      Email: ConsumerRights@BarshaySanders.com


IRON LION: Riddle Seeks Unpaid Overtime, Damages Under FLSA
-----------------------------------------------------------
DONALD RIDDLE, individually and on behalf of all other similarly
situated individuals v. IRON LION ENTRIES, LLC, a Tennessee
corporation, DACE MURPHY, THOMAS MURPHY, and ANTHONY MANTEGANI,
Case No. 3:19-cv-00482 (M.D. Tenn., June 5, 2019), seeks to recover
alleged unpaid overtime wages and liquidated damages pursuant to
the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Iron Lion Entries, LLC, is a Tennessee limited liability
corporation headquartered in Franklin, Tennessee.  The Individual
Defendants are members of ILE and have operational control over
ILE.

The Defendants install wrought iron entry doors and architectural
steel doors in residential and commercial locations throughout the
Southeast United States.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Randall W. Burton, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF RANDALL BURTON
          1222 16th Avenue, South, Suite 23
          Nashville, TN 37212
          Telephone: (615) 620-5838


J.G. WENTWORTH: Burner Suit Alleges FLSA Violation
--------------------------------------------------
David Burner, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. J.G. Wentworth Home Lending LLC, Case No. 1:19-cv-00457
(E.D. Va., April 12, 2019), is brought against the Defendant for
violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Defendant violated the FLSA by not accurately tracking and
counting total hours worked, including overtime hours and by
failing to include all required remuneration into the regular rate
of pay to calculate overtime.

The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant as a Loan Officer,
approximately June 2014 to October 2017, whose primary job duties
involved selling Defendant's loan products to individuals over the
telephone from a call center.

The Defendant is a national provider of home loan mortgages. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jacob M. Small, Esq.
      J. MADISON PLC
      9302 Lee Highway, Suite 1200
      McLean, VA 22031
      Tel: (703) 910-5062
      Fax: (703) 910-5107
      E-mail: jmsmall@jmadisonplc.com


JUMIA TECHNOLOGIES: Cohen Milstein Conducting Probe
---------------------------------------------------
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC is conducting an investigation
to determine whether Jumia Technologies AG and certain of its
officers and directors made false and misleading statements and/or
omissions in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

A class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York by another law firm on behalf of
purchasers of the common stock of Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA)
between April 12, 2019 and May 9, 2019, inclusive (the "Class
Period").

The complaint alleges that Jumia and certain of its officers and
directors ("Defendants") misrepresented and/or failed to disclose
that: (1) Jumia had materially overstated its active customers and
active merchants; (2) Jumia's representations about its orders,
order cancellations, undelivered orders and returned orders lacked
a sufficient factual basis and materially overstated the Company's
sales; (3) Jumia failed to sufficiently disclose related party
transactions; and (4) Jumia's financial statements were presented
in violation of applicable accounting standards.

The Company sold 15.5 million ADSs priced at $14.50 on April 12,
2019. The Class Period begins the day Jumia ADSs began trading on
the New York Stock Exchange. Less than one month after trading
began, on May 9, 2019, Citron Research issued a report declaring
Jumia to be a "fraud" that "deserves immediate SEC attention."
Citron claimed to have a "smoking gun," in the form of a
confidential October 2018 investor presentation the Company used to
raise capital months before its initial public offering. Jumia ADSs
fell from $33.11 to $26.89 on May 9 and lost an additional $2.39 to
close at $24.50 on May 10, representing a two-day decline of
approximately 26%.

Cohen Milstein encourages all investors who purchased Jumia's
common stock between April 12, 2019 and May 9, 2019, or former
employees with information concerning this matter to contact the
firm.

If you are a Jumia shareholder and would like to discuss your right
to recover for your economic loss, you may, without any cost or
obligation, call Cohen Milstein's Managing Partner, Steven J. Toll
at (888) 240-0775 or (202) 408-4600, or email him at
stoll@cohenmilstein.com. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff,
you must move the Court no later than July 15, 2019 to request
appointment. Any member of the proposed class may retain Cohen
Milstein or other attorneys to serve as your counsel in this
action, or you may do nothing and remain an absent class member.

Cohen Milstein has significant experience in prosecuting investor
class actions and actions involving securities fraud and is active
in major litigation pending in federal and state courts throughout
the nation. Cohen Milstein has taken a lead role in numerous
important cases on behalf of defrauded investors and has been
responsible for a number of outstanding recoveries which, in the
aggregate, total billions of dollars. Prior results do not
guarantee a similar outcome. For more information visit
www.cohenmilstein.com.

If you have any questions about this notice or the action, or with
regard to your rights please contact:

         Steven J. Toll, Esq.
         Marie Mullins, Esq.
         Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
         1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
         Fifth Floor
         Washington, D.C. 20005
         Phone: (888) 240-0775
                (202) 408-4600
         Email: stoll@cohenmilstein.com
                mmullins@cohenmilstein.com [GN]


KIDS TOWN: Minyety Suit Seeks to Recover Overtime Pay and Damages
-----------------------------------------------------------------
JUAN MINYETY, on behalf of himself, FLSA Collective Plaintiffs and
the Class v. KIDS TOWN, INC., KIDSTOWN 161 STREET LLC, VERSACE
RETAIL SYSTEMS LLC, HL KIDS APPAREL CORP., 991 SOUTHERN BOULEVARD
ASSOCIATES LLC, JOSEPH SUTTON and MARC SUTTON, Case No.
1:19-cv-05273 (S.D.N.Y., June 5, 2019), alleges that pursuant to
the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Plaintiff and others are entitled
to recover from the Defendants: (1) unpaid overtime compensation,
(2) liquidated damages and (3) attorneys' fees and costs.

The Defendants operate a chain of children's apparel retail stores
under the common trade name "Kidstown," with five locations in New
York City.

Kids Town, Inc., is a domestic business corporation organized under
the laws of the state of New York.  Kidstown 161 Street LLC is a
domestic limited liability company organized under the laws of New
York.  Versace Retail Systems LLC is a foreign limited liability
company organized under the laws of New Jersey.

HL Kids Apparel Corp. is a domestic business corporation organized
under the laws of New York.  991 Southern Boulevard Associates LLC
is a domestic limited liability company organized under the laws of
New York.  The Individual Defendants owned and operated the
Kidstown Stores.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          C.K. Lee, Esq.
          Anne Seelig, Esq.
          LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC
          148 West 24th Street, 8th Floor
          New York, NY 10011
          Telephone: (212) 465-1188
          Facsimile: (212) 465-1181
          E-mail: cklee@leelitigation.com
                  anne@leelitigation.com


KOSTMAYER CONSTRUCTION: Baez-Acuna Seeks to Recover Unpaid OT Wages
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose Baez-Acuna, on behalf of himself and other persons similarly
situated v. Kostmayer Construction, LLC, Hiram Investments, LLC,
and James H. Kostmayer, Jr., Case No. 2:19-cv-09314 (E.D. La.,
April 11, 2019), is brought against the Defendants for violation of
the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Plaintiff worked as a sandblaster, helper and painter by the
Defendants in approximately 2012. The Plaintiff is a permanent
resident of the United States and Mexico. The Plaintiff seeks to
recover unpaid overtime wages from the Defendants. The Plaintiff
alleged that while working for the Defendants, he was not paid
one-and-a half times his regular hourly rate for all hours worked
in excess of forty hours a workweek.

The Defendant Kostmayer is in the business of providing
full-service marine fabrication facilities, performing extensive
piping work in petrochemical and industrial plants, building
material handling systems, and performing heavy civil construction
work throughout the Gulf Coast states, including Louisiana.

The Defendant is a professional, commercial real estate company
that provides a full range of services including leasing, property
management and development for office, warehouse and retail spaces
in Louisiana. The Defendant James Kostmayer, is an owner,
President, Manager, and Director of Defendants Kostmayer and Hiram.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jonathan Mille Kirkland, Esq.
      Roberto Luis Costales, Esq.
      William H. Beaumont, Esq.
      BEAUMONT COSTALES LLC
      3801 Canal Street, Suite 207
      New Orleans, LA 70119
      Tel: (504) 534-5005
      E-mail: jmk@beaumontcostales.com


LABORATORY CORP: Shulman Files Class Suit in North Carolina
-----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Laboratory
Corporation of America Holdings. The case is styled as Tatyana
Shulman, individually and on behalf of all those similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings,
Defendant, Case No. 1:19-cv-00616 (M.D. N.C., June 19, 2019).

The nature of suit is stated as Personal Property-Other.

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, more commonly known as
LabCorp, is an American S&P 500 company headquartered in
Burlington, North Carolina. It operates one of the largest clinical
laboratory networks in the world, with a United States network of
36 primary laboratories.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

   David Matthew Wilkerson, Esq.
   Van Winkle Buck Wall Starnes & Davis, P.A.
   POB 7376
   Asheville, NC 28802
   Tel: (828) 258-2991
   Fax: (828) 257-2767
   Email: dwilkerson@vwlawfirm.com


LE ENERGY: Charvat Sues Over Unsolicited Calls
----------------------------------------------
Philip Charvat, individually and on behalf of a class of all
persons and entities similarly situated v. Le Energy, LLC dba
Utility Gas & Power, Case No. 2:19-cv-1325 (S.D. Ohio, April 9,
2019), is brought against the Defendant for violation of the
Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

The complaint alleges that the Defendant made a pre-recorded
telemarketing call to the Plaintiff's residential telephone number
without obtaining his prior express consent, which is prohibited by
the TCPA.

The Plaintiff is a resident of the state of Ohio in this district.
The Plaintiff never consented to receiving the call, which was
placed to him by the Defendant for telemarketing purposes.

The Defendant LE Energy regularly engages in business in this
district, including making telemarketing calls into this district
and soliciting business from this district for its regionalized
energy programs. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:


      Brian K. Murphy, Esq.
      Jonathan P. Misny, Esq.
      MURRAY MURPHY MOUL + BASIL LLP
      1114 Dublin Road
      Columbus, OH 43215
      Tel: (614) 488-0400
      Fax: (614) 488-0401
      E-mail: murphy@mmmb.com
              misny@mmmb.com



LLOYD'S LONDON: Sept. 18 Settlement Fairness Hearing Set
--------------------------------------------------------
IF YOU PURCHASED INSURANCE THROUGH CERTAIN SYNDICATES AT LLOYD'S,
LONDON DURING THE PERIOD
JANUARY 1, 1997, THROUGH MARCH 25, 2019, YOU COULD GET MONEY FROM A
PARTIAL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT THAT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS

A proposed partial class action settlement has been reached with
some, but not all, of the Lloyd's Syndicates who are Defendants in
the case and sold insurance to policyholders in the United States.
Plaintiffs assert causes of action against the Defendants for
violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Act, civil conspiracy, and unjust enrichment based on allegations
that Defendants engaged in a deceptive scheme to conceal the lack
of competition in the Lloyd's Market. The Settling Defendants deny
the allegations made against them.

The Syndicates that have settled are Syndicate Nos. 0033, 0102,
0382, 0435, 0570, 0609, 0623, 0958, 1183, 1886, 2001, 2623, and
2987 (the "Settling Defendants"). The Syndicates who are Defendants
in the case, but who have not settled, are Syndicate Nos. 0510,
0727, 1003, 1084, 1096, 1245, 2003, 2020, 2488, and 2791 (the
"Non-Settling Defendants"). The case will continue to be litigated
against the Non-Settling Defendants.

WHAT ARE YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND IMPORTANT DEADLINES?

If you do not want to be legally bound by the Settlement, you must
exclude yourself in writing from the Class by August 28, 2019. The
steps you must follow to be excluded are described in the Long-form
Notice, which is available at www.SyndicateSettlement.com. You can
also obtain a copy of the Long-form Notice by mail or email by
calling the toll-free number at 1-877-298-4134 between the hours of
8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Central Time, or by emailing
info@SyndicateSettlement.com. If you do not exclude yourself, but
instead stay in the Class, you may object or comment on the
Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, the application for attorneys'
fees and expenses, or service awards to the class representatives
by August 28, 2019. The procedure on how to object or comment is
described in the Long-form Notice at www.SyndicateSettlement.com.

There is a Fairness Hearing scheduled on September 18, 2019, at
10:30 a.m. Eastern Time, at which the Court will consider whether
to approve the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, an award of
attorneys' fees and expenses, and service awards for the class
representatives. The hearing will take place in Courtroom 5B in the
United States Courthouse located at Martin Luther King Building and
U.S. Courthouse, 50 Walnut Street, Newark, New Jersey 07101. The
Court may choose to change the date and/or time of the hearing
without further notice of any kind. If you plan to attend the
hearing, you should confirm the date and time by checking the
website at www.SyndicateSettlement.com or by calling the toll-free
number at 1-877-298-4134. At the hearing, the Court will consider
objections that have been properly made by Class members. If the
Court finds the Settlement to be fair, reasonable and adequate, it
will approve the Settlement. You may choose to attend the hearing,
either in person or through an attorney hired at your own expense,
but attendance is not required. If you choose to attend the hearing
and intend to make a presentation to the Court, you or your
attorney must follow the procedures set forth in the Long-form
Notice, at www.SyndicateSettlement.com.

A NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPEAR MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE COURT AND
THE COUNSEL IDENTIFIED BELOW NO LATER THAN AUGUST 28, 2019.

If the Court approves the Settlement, then the Settling Defendants
will be dismissed from the case. Class members who have not
properly requested exclusion from the Class will be deemed to have
released the Settling Defendants from all claims related to the
case and will not be able to sue the Settling Defendants for any of
the conduct that was the subject of the case. The full text of the
Release is set forth in the Long-form Notice at
www.SyndicateSettlement.com.

WHO IS INCLUDED IN THE CLASS?

The Settlement affects members of the Class, which are, with
certain limited exceptions, all persons and entities in the United
States who, during the period January 1, 1997, through March 25,
2019 (the "Class Period"), purchased or renewed a contract of
insurance (an insurance policy, not reinsurance) with any of the
Defendants. The complete description of the Class is set forth in
the Long-form Notice at www.SyndicateSettlement.com.

WHAT DOES THE SETTLEMENT PROVIDE?

The Settling Defendants have agreed to make separate payments to
settle the claims against them. The total amount of these payments
is $21,950,000. After deducting the amounts approved by the Court
for settlement and claims administration costs, attorneys' fees and
litigation expenses, and service awards for the class
representatives, these funds will be paid to members of the Class.
Each Settling Defendant that pays its individual share is entitled
to the release and other provisions of the Settlement. In addition,
each of the Settling Defendants that still sell insurance at
Lloyd's of London has agreed to implement business reforms for a
five-year period. The complete description of these business
reforms is set forth in the Long-form Notice at
www.SyndicateSettlement.com.

WHO WILL RECEIVE A PAYMENT?

Payments to Class members will be according to the Plan of
Allocation, which is included in the Long-form Notice at
www.SyndicateSettlement.com. To receive a payment, Class members
must submit a Claim Form by October 25, 2019, as more fully
described in the next paragraph.

HOW DO I RECEIVE A PAYMENT FROM THE SETTLEMENT?

To be eligible for a payment, a Class member must submit a Claim
Form on or before October 25, 2019. Claim Forms are available at
www.SyndicateSettlement.com. Claim Forms can be requested from the
Claims Administrator by calling the toll-free number at
1-877-298-4134 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Central
Time, or by email at info@SyndicateSettlement.com. Claim Forms can
be completed online at www.SyndicateSettlement.com, or mailed to
the Claims Administrator at Syndicate Settlement, c/o A.B. Data,
Ltd., P.O. Box 173075, Milwaukee, WI 53217. If the Court finally
approves the Settlement, each Class member who wishes to claim part
of the Settlement must submit a Claim Form by October 25, 2019. It
is the responsibility of the Class member to provide truthful and
accurate information, and to update any information, including
contact and address information, to the Claims Administrator, when
appropriate.

WHO ARE THE ATTORNEYS FOR THE CLASS AND THE SETTLING DEFENDANTS?

The Attorneys for the Class are:

Rachel L. Jensen
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
San Diego, CA 92101

Robert S. Schachter
ZWERLING, SCHACHTER & ZWERLING, LLP
41 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10010

The Attorneys for the Settling Defendants are:

Matthew M. Burke
ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
Prudential Tower
800 Boylston Street, Suite 2500
Boston, MA 02199
John M. Toriello
HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
31 West 52nd Street, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10019

Abigail Nitka
MESSNER REEVES LLP
805 Third Avenue, 18th Floor
New York, NY 10022

HOW CAN I OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION?

If you think that you may be a Class Member, you can obtain more
information, including a copy of the Long-form Notice, the Claim
Form, the Settlement Agreement, and other documents relating to the
Settlement.

PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR THE CLERK


LOCO FOOD: Knowles Asserts Breach of Disabilities Act
-----------------------------------------------------
Loco Food LLC is facing a class action lawsuit filed pursuant to
the Americans with Disabilities Act. The case is styled as Carlton
Knowles, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff v. Loco Food LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:19-cv-04125 (N.D.
Ill., June 19, 2019).

Loco Food LLC (trade name Fat Rice) is in the Chinese Restaurant
business.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

   C.K. Lee, Esq.
   Lee Litigation Group, PLLC
   73 West Monroe Street
   Chicago, IL 60603
   Tel: (212) 465-1188
   Email: cklee@leelitigation.com




LOS ANGELES, CA: LA DWP GM to Step Down After Controversial Deal
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dakota Smith, writing for Los Angeles Times, reports that David
Wright, general manager of the Los Angeles Department of Water and
Power since 2016, will step down Oct. 1, 2019, Mayor Eric
Garcetti's office said on June 14.

His planned departure follows new controversy over the $67-million
settlement in 2017 of a class-action lawsuit brought by DWP
customers who were overcharged when the utility rolled out a new
billing system.

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge earlier this month appointed an
investigator to scrutinize issues surrounding the settlement,
including multimillion-dollar DWP contracts given to an attorney
involved in the legal agreement.

On June 13 night, Wright declined to comment when asked if he was
stepping down.

Wright replaced general manager Marcie Edwards and previously
served as the utility's chief operating officer.

During his time at the utility, Wright focused on fixing the
billing system and improving customer service after hundreds of
thousands of customers were overcharged following the
implementation of a new billing system in 2013.

He also worked to reduce reliance on imported water, promoted clean
energy and took "important steps towards building the DWP of the
future," Garcetti said in a statement.

The DWP also recently announced plans to abandon rebuilding three
gas-fired power plants, delighting environmentalists supportive of
Garcetti's move to get off fossil fuels.

However, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local
18, the largest union representing DWP employees, opposed the
decision and recently launched a television and radio campaign
attacking the mayor's green proposals. The union fears job losses
under Garcetti's recently released "Green New Deal."

Garcetti said in the statement he has nominated DWP chief operating
officer Marty Adams, a 35-year-veteran of the utility, to be the
next general manager. Adams' appointment requires City Council
approval.

Wright is the third general manager to depart the utility under
Garcetti.

Garcetti was elected mayor after running a campaign focused on
reforming the DWP, but controversies persist at the utility,
including recent allegations stemming from the overbilling fiasco.

The allegations were first made in court documents by
PricewaterhouseCoopers, the consulting firm behind the billing
system. The city sued the firm, also known as PwC, accusing it of
misrepresenting its ability to implement the system.

The city faces accusations from PwC that attorneys working for City
Atty. Mike Feuer took part in a scheme to quickly settle the
class-action lawsuit brought by DWP ratepayers by hand-picking the
plaintiff and the opposing attorneys who filed the claim, according
to court testimony.

At issue is whether attorneys worked both sides of the deal and
benefited financially from the settlement.

Wright has not been accused of wrongdoing.

Feuer's office has also denied wrongdoing and issued a statement
seeking to cast blame on two outside lawyers hired by the city
attorney's office to work on issues related to the billing
debacle.

However, one of those attorneys, Beverly Hills lawyer Paul Kiesel,
Esq. told The Times that his work was done at the "express
direction" of Feuer's office.

Judge Elihu M. Berle earlier this month appointed Edward M.
Robbins, a former federal prosecutor, to investigate issues
surrounding the settlement and payments to attorneys.

At Wright's recommendation, the DWP in 2017 approved a $30-million
contract for a company owned by Paul Paradis, one of the attorneys
hired by Feuer's office who allegedly played a central role in the
settlement deal, according to court testimony.

Paradis was previously awarded a separate contract from the DWP
worth $6 million. His attorney didn't return a phone call on June
13 and Paradis has repeatedly declined to comment about his role.

The DWP also hired Paradis' son at an annual salary of $72,000 in
2016, a spokesman for the utility confirmed. The utility also paid
for a $4,000 graduate school course for the son, as part of the
DWP's program to pay for advanced degrees. The son no longer works
for the utility.

As allegations against Paradis and others surfaced earlier this
year, the DWP board voted to cancel the $30-million contract,
though more than $20 million had been paid out.

Los Angeles City Council members also called Wright and city
attorneys to City Hall last month for a closed-door hearing about
the contracts with Paradis and issues surrounding the settlement.

Separately, Feuer's office is defending Wright and the DWP against
a legal claim stemming from a 2017 car accident in downtown Los
Angeles involving Wright. Plaintiffs Luis Sanchez and Luz Alvarez
filed the claim last year, court documents show.

Consumer Watchdog president Jamie Court called Wright's departure
"good news for consumers" in light of the allegations surrounding
the settlement, but criticized Garcetti's choice of a longtime DWP
executive as a replacement.

"Until the city council and the mayor realize that they need a
fresh start with an outsider in charge, DWP customers and taxpayers
are going to be disappointed with the failure to have a responsive
department," Court said.

Jasmin Vargas, a senior organizer with Food & Water Watch, said
Wright came on the job with big ambitions of moving the DWP toward
100% clean energy, but faced bureaucratic and political stumbling
blocks. "It's a shame that we weren't able to see more from him
during his tenure," Vargas said. [GN]


MAMMOTH ENERGY: Schall Law Firm Files Class Action Lawsuit
----------------------------------------------------------
The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm,
announces the filing of a class action lawsuit against Mammoth
Energy Services, Inc. ("Mammoth" or "the Company") (NASDAQ: TUSK)
for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company's shares between October 19,
2017 and June 5, 2019, inclusive (the ''Class Period''), are
encouraged to contact the firm before August 6, 2019.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law
Firm, 1880 Century Park East, Suite 404, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at
424-303-1964, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also
reach us through the firm's website at www.schallfirm.com, or by
email at brian@schallfirm.com.

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until
certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If
you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class
member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading
statements to the market. Mammoth subsidiary Cobra was awarded two
infrastructure contracts with PREPA totaling more than $1.8
billion. The contracts were obtained as the result of improper
steering and were not awarded on the basis of a competitive RFP
process. Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were
false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When
the market learned the truth about Mammoth, investors suffered
damages.

Join the case to recover your losses.

Contact:

         Brian Schall, Esq.
         The Schall Law Firm
         1880 Century Park East, Suite 404
         Los Angeles, CA 90067
         Phone:
            Office: 310-301-3335
            Cell: 424-303-1964
         Website: www.schallfirm.com
         Email: info@schallfirm.com
                brian@schallfirm.com [GN]


MCAFEE INC: Oct. 4 Settlement Fairness Hearing Set
--------------------------------------------------
The following statement is being issued by Robbins Geller Rudman &
Dowd LLP regarding the McAfee Shareholder Litigation:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

In re McAFEE, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION     )   
Consolidated action, including:               )  
Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County )   
Superior Court, Case No. 1:10-cv-180413       )  
Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County   )
Superior Court, Case No. 1:10-cv-180420       )
Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County  )
Superior Court, Case No. 1:10-cv-180597       )
Korsinsky v. Bass, Santa Clara County         )
Superior Court, Case No. 1:10-cv-180928       )
                                              )
This Document Relates To:                     )
ALL ACTIONS.                                  )
                        
Lead Case No. 1:10-cv-180413
CLASS ACTION
Judge: Hon. Thomas E. Kuhnle
Dept: 5

SUMMARY NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IF YOU HELD SHARES OF COMMON STOCK IN MCAFEE, INC. ("MCAFEE") AND
EXCHANGED YOUR SHARES FOR CONSIDERATION IN THE ACQUISITION OF
MCAFEE BY INTEL CORPORATION ("INTEL") AT THE PRICE OF $48.00 PER
SHARE, YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE SETTLEMENT OF A CLASS
ACTION.

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the Superior Court
of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, that a hearing
will be held on October 4, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. (the "Settlement
Hearing"), in Department 5, 191 North First Street, San Jose,
California 95113, for the purpose of determining: (1) whether the
proposed settlement of the claims in the Action
for the sum of $11,700,000.00 in cash on the terms set forth in the
Stipulation of Settlement dated March 13, 2019 ("Stipulation" or
"Settlement") should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable,
and adequate; (2) whether the plan of distribution is fair,
reasonable, and adequate and therefore should be approved; and (3)
whether the application of Class Counsel for an award of attorneys'
fees and expenses and a service award to Plaintiff, the Central
Laborers' Pension Fund, should be approved.

If you received consideration for your McAfee common stock shares
in the acquisition of McAfee by Intel at the price of $48.00 per
share, your rights may be affected by the Settlement of this
Action. If you have not received a more detailed Notice of Proposed
Settlement of Class Action ("Notice") and a copy of the Proof of
Claim, you may obtain copies by writing to McAfee
Shareholder Litigation, Claims Administrator, c/o Gilardi & Co.
LLC, P.O. Box 404129, Louisville, KY 40233-4129, or you can
download a copy at www.McAfeeShareholderSettlement.com. If you are
a Class Member, in order to share in the Settlement proceeds, you
must submit a Proof of Claim by mail postmarked no later than
September 9, 2019, or submitted electronically no later than
September 9, 2019, establishing that you are entitled to recovery.
You will be bound by any judgment rendered in the Action whether or
not you make a claim. If you requested exclusion from the Class in
connection with the Notice of Pendency, no further action is
required to be excluded from the
Class for purposes of the Settlement or any judgment that may be
entered in this Action.

Although you may appear and be heard at the Settlement Hearing
without filing a written submission in advance, should you wish to
file a written objection to the Settlement, the plan of
distribution, or Class Counsel's request for an award of attorneys'
fees and expenses and/or the service award to Plaintiff, you may do
so by filing it with the Court at the address below and sending it
to Class Counsel listed below such that it is received no later
than August 12, 2019:

The Court:                          
                    Clerk of the Court                   
                    SUPERIOR COURT OF                   
                    CALIFORNIA                           
                    COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA                
                    191 North First Street              
                    San Jose, CA 95113                   

Class Counsel:
                    Maxwell Huffman
                    ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
                    655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
                    San Diego, CA 92101

Inquiries regarding the Settlement or the Action may be made to a
representative of Class Counsel or the Claims Administrator:
                                                               
                    ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP               
               
                    Shareholder Relations
                    655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
                    San Diego, CA 92101
                    1-800-449-4900

                    McAfee Shareholder Litigation
                    Claims Administrator
                    c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC
                    P.O. Box 404129
                    Louisville, KY 40233-4129
                    1-866-610-7721                                 
                                        
                    www.McAfeeShareholderSettlement.com
                                                              
PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT DEFENDANTS, THE COURT, OR THE CLERK OF THE
COURT ABOUT THE SETTLEMENT.

DATED: May 28, 2019                           

BY ORDER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
                                               
All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the
same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation. The Stipulation can
be viewed and/or downloaded at
www.McAfeeShareholderSettlement.com.


MDL 2887: Albion Suit over Tainted Pet Food Moved to Kansas
-----------------------------------------------------------
The case, WILLIAM ALBION, on behalf of himself and all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, vs. HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC.
and Colgate-Palmolive Company, the Defendants, Case No.
5:19-cv-00935 (Filed May 20, 2019), was transferred from the U.S.
District Court for the Central District of California, to the U.S.
District Court for the District of Kansas (Kansas City) on June 18,
2019. The District of Kansas Court Clerk assigned Case No.
2:19-cv-02326-JAR-TJJ to proceeding. The case is assigned to the
Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson. The suit alleges
Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act violation.

Plaintiff seeks monetary relief and an order forcing Hill's to
provide appropriate injunctive relief by ensuring that all
potentially affected products are identified on Hill's website and
removed from shelves.

The Albion case is being consolidated with MDL 2887 in re: HILL'S
PET NUTRITION, INC., DOG FOOD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. The
MDL was created by Order of the United States Judicial Panel
Multidistrict Litigation on June 4, 2019.

The Panel finds that these actions involve common questions of
fact, and that centralization in the District of Kansas will serve
the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just
and efficient conduct of this litigation. The actions share factual
issues arising from allegations that multiple varieties of Hill's
Prescription Diet and Science Diet canned dog food products were
defective, in that they contained dangerously high levels of
Vitamin D. Centralization will eliminate duplicative discovery, the
possibility of inconsistent rulings on class certification, Daubert
motions, and other pretrial matters, and conserve judicial and
party resources.

In its June 5, 2019 Order, the MDL Panel select the District of
Kansas as the transferee district. Hill's is headquartered in that
district, and it represents that its key evidence and witnesses are
located there. Eight potential tagalong actions are pending in the
District of Kansas, and its selection is supported by both Hill's
and a number of plaintiffs. Presiding Judge in the MDL is Hon.
Judge Julie A. Robinson. The lead case is Case No.
2:19-md-02887-JAR-TJJ.[BN]

Attorneys for the Plaintiff are:

          Jay Smith, Esq.
          Joshua F. Young, Esq.
          GILBERT & SACKMAN
          A LAW CORPORATION
          3699 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1200
          Los Angeles, CA 90010
          Telephone: (323) 938-3000
          Facsimile: (323) 937-9139
          E-mail: js@gslaw.org
                  jyoung@gslaw.org

MDL 2887: Manier Suit over Tainted Pet Food Moved to Kansas
-----------------------------------------------------------
The case, Sharon Manier on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, vs. HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC.
and Colgate-Palmolive Company, the Defendants, Case No.
2:19-cv-04248 (Filed May 16, 2019), was transferred from the U.S.
District Court for the Central District of California, to the U.S.
District Court for the District of Kansas (Kansas City) on June 18,
2019. The District of Kansas Court Clerk assigned Case No.
2:19-cv-02328-JAR-TJJ to proceeding. The case is assigned to the
Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson. The suit alleges
Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act violation.

Plaintiff seeks monetary relief and an order forcing Hill's to
provide appropriate injunctive relief by ensuring that all
potentially affected products are identified on Hill's website and
removed from shelves.

The Manier case is being consolidated with MDL 2887 in re: HILL'S
PET NUTRITION, INC., DOG FOOD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. The
MDL was created by Order of the United States Judicial Panel
Multidistrict Litigation on June 4, 2019.

The Panel finds that these actions involve common questions of
fact, and that centralization in the District of Kansas will serve
the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just
and efficient conduct of this litigation. The actions share factual
issues arising from allegations that multiple varieties of Hill's
Prescription Diet and Science Diet canned dog food products were
defective, in that they contained dangerously high levels of
Vitamin D. Centralization will eliminate duplicative discovery, the
possibility of inconsistent rulings on class certification, Daubert
motions, and other pretrial matters, and conserve judicial and
party resources.

In its June 5, 2019 Order, the MDL Panel select the District of
Kansas as the transferee district. Hill's is headquartered in that
district, and it represents that its key evidence and witnesses are
located there. Eight potential tagalong actions are pending in the
District of Kansas, and its selection is supported by both Hill's
and a number of plaintiffs. Presiding Judge in the MDL is Hon.
Judge Julie A. Robinson. The lead case is Case No.
2:19-md-02887-JAR-TJJ.[BN]

Attorneys for the Plaintiff are:

          Marc L. Godino, Esq.
          STULL, STULL & BRODY
          10940 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2300
          Los Angeles, CA 90024
          Telephone: (310) 209-2468
          Facsimile: (310) 209-2087

MENN LAW: Cole Sues Under FDCPA Over Deceptive Collection Letter
----------------------------------------------------------------
Kaitlyn Cole, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Menn Law Firm, Ltd., Case No.1:19-cv-00527 (E.D. Wis.,
April 12, 2019), is brought against the Defendant for violation of
the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

The Defendant mailed a letter to the Plaintiff alleging that the
Plaintiff had incurred and defaulted on a financial obligation, in
an attempt to collect the debt. The statement did not accurately
state COLE's rights under the FDCPA, and was misleading and
deceptive, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff was a citizen of, and resided in, the City of Green
Bay, Brown County, Wisconsin.

The Defendant regularly engages in the collection of defaulted
consumer debts owed to others. Its principal business address is at
2501 East Enterprise Avenue, City of Appleton, Outagamie County,
Wisconsin. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Francis R. Greene, Esq.
      Philip D. Stern, Esq.
      Andrew T. Thomasson, Esq.
      STERN THOMASSON LLP
      3010 South Appleton Road
      Menasha, Wisconsin 54952
      Tel: (973) 379-7500
      E-mail: Francis@SternThomasson.com
              Philip@SternThomasson.com
              Andrew@SternThomasson.com


MID VALLEY COLLECTION: Ochoa Files Class Suit under FDCPA
---------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Mid Valley Collection
Bureau. The case is styled as Susan Ochoa, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Mid Valley
Collection Bureau, Law Offices of Clark Garen, The Best Service
Co., Inc., Todd Shields, Donald Hopp and DOES 1 through 10
inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 2:19-cv-05352  (C.D. Cal., June 19,
2019).

The docket of the case states the nature of suit as Consumer Credit
filed pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Mid Valley Collection Bureau is a professional collection
consultant.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

   Amir J Goldstein, Esq.
   Amir J Goldstein Law Offices
   8032 West Third Street Suite 201
   Los Angeles, CA 90048
   Tel: (323) 937-0400
   Fax: (866) 288-9194
   Email: ajg@consumercounselgroup.com




MIDLAND CREDIT: Davis Sues over Debt Collection Practices
---------------------------------------------------------
Anna Marie Davis, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, vs. Midland Credit Management,
Inc., Midland Funding, LLC, and John Does 1-25, the Defendants,
Case No. 1:19-cv-01124-UNA (D. Del., June 18, 2019), seeks damages
and declaratory relief under the Fair Debt Collections Practices
Act.

On or about June 20, 2018, Defendant Midland Credit sent Plaintiff
a collection letter regarding her debt to Webbank that contained
multiple settlement offers. In the Letter, Defendants failed to
inform the consumer that making a partial payment would result in
restarting the statute of limitations for a lawsuit to be filed
against the Plaintiff. The Letter contains an invitation for
Plaintiff to choose a settlement offer and begin making monthly
payments.

However, the Letter is deceptive in that it failed to inform
Plaintiff of the true ramifications of making a payment. The
Defendants' omission could likely lead to Plaintiff making a
partial payment which would have had the consequence of restarting
the statute of limitations, the lawsuit says.

Congress enacted the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act in response
to the "abundant evidence of the use of abusive, deceptive, and
unfair debt collection practices by many debt collectors." Congress
explained that the purpose of the FDCPA was not only to eliminate
abusive debt collection practices, but also to "insure that those
debt collectors who refrain from using abusive debt collection
practices are not competitively disadvantaged."

Midland Credit is a company that uses the mail, telephone, and
facsimile and regularly engages in business the principal purpose
of which is to attempt to collect debts alleged to be due another.
Midland Funding is engaged in the business of acquiring, or
claiming to acquire, delinquent debts and collecting them, both
directly and through collection agencies.[BN]

Attorney for the Plaintiff is:

          Antranig Garibian, Esq.
          GARIBIAN LAW OFFICES, P.C.
          1010 N. Bancroft Parkway, Suite 22
          Wilmington, DE 19805
          Telephone: (302) 722-6885
          E-mail: ag@garibianlaw.com

MIDWESTERN HOLDINGS: Qasemy Seeks Unpaid Wages & Overtime Pay
-------------------------------------------------------------
MUHAMMAD QASEMY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, the Plaintiff, vs. QUALITY MIDWESTERN HOLDINGS, INC.
d/b/a/ "QUALITY SERVICES MOVING"; and EDWARD GRAVES 10595 Furnace
Rd Ste 140 Lorton, VA 22079, the Defendants, Case No. 1:19-cv-00809
(E.D. Va., June 18, 2019), seeks to recover unpaid wages and
overtime compensation for Plaintiff and other similarly situated
co-workers who work or have worked for Quality Services Moving.

The Plaintiff alleges on behalf of himself and other current and
former employees as well as those similarly situated current and
former employees holding comparable positions but different titles
employed by Defendants that they are entitled to, (i) unpaid wages
for all hours worked in a workweek, as required by law, (ii) unpaid
overtime wages for hours worked above 40 in a workweek, as required
by law, and (iii) liquidated damages pursuant to the FLSA.

The Plaintiff worked as a "Mover," a position that entailed driving
Sprinter vans to sites to ship and deliver items for clients, which
included loading and unloading trucks, preparing the trucks for
shipments, and driving to and from the delivery sites.

The Plaintiff and Collective Action Members drove and/or loaded
and/or served as drivers' helpers for vehicles weighing less than
10,000lbs., such as a Sprinter van, which had a Gross Vehicle
Weight Rating ("GVWR") of 8,550 lbs. They would regularly perform
work for which Defendants did not pay them wages.

Specifically, if Plaintiff and the Collective Action Members were
still working at a job site, they would not be paid for driving
back from the job site to the office. Thus, even though Plaintiff
and the Collective Action Members would have to complete the job
and drive back to headquarters and return their vans, Plaintiff and
the Collective Action Members would not receive wages for driving
back from the job site to the office, the lawsuit says.[BN]

Attorneys for the Plaintiff are:

          Matthew T. Sutter, Esq.
          SUTTER & TERPAK, PLLC
          7540 Little River Tnpk.
          Suite A, First Floor
          Annandale, VA 22003
          Telephone: (703) 256-1800
          Facsimile: (703) 991-6116
          E-mail: matt@sutterandterpak.com

               - and -

          Nicholas A. Migliaccio, Esq.
          Jason S. Rathod, Esq.
          MIGLIACCIO & RATHOD LLP
          412 H Street N.E., Suite 302
          Washington, D.C. 20002
          Telephone: (202) 470-3520
          Facsimile: (202) 800-2730

OREGON: Pendleton Ceases Jailing People Over Court Fines
--------------------------------------------------------
The Oregonian staff and wire reports that the eastern Oregon city
of Pendleton has stopped jailing people unable to pay fines
following the settlement of a federal lawsuit contending city
officials were running a debtors' prison.

The East Oregonian reported on June 15 that city attorney Nancy
Kerns said city court officials recently adopted new policies that
ban the use of jail time for fines arising from minor violations.

Anglea Minthorn spent nearly two months in jail in 2017 for owing
about $1,000.

She sued in early 2018, contending the city was violating the U.S.
Constitution by incarcerating a debtor unable to pay the debt.

She and the city reached a settlement in April, with the city
paying Minthorn $130,000.

Kerns declined to comment about the case.

Other questions about legal system injustice for poor people have
been in the news lately as well.

Last fall, lawyers filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of
low-income drivers in Oregon, challenging the state's right to
suspend a driver's license solely because they cannot pay a fine.

And earlier this month, the district attorney in Bend said his
office will stop prosecuting some misdemeanors to focus on more
serious crimes. OPB reported that Deschutes County District
Attorney, John Hummel, Esq. -- John.Hummel@dcda.us -- said his
office would no longer prosecute misdemeanor crimes for people
driving with a suspended license, as long as the suspect has zero
or only one prior conviction for the crime. Last year, the DA's
office prosecuted more than 500 driving while suspended cases, OPB
said. [GN]


ORTHONET LLC: Solis Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages
---------------------------------------------------
Joanna Solis, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Orthonet LLC, Defendant, Case No.
19-cv-04678, (S.D. N.Y., May 21, 2019), seeks monetary damages,
liquidated damages, prejudgment interest, civil penalties and
costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees under the Fair Labor
Standards Act and New York labor law.

Orthonet is a managed care company that performs benefit management
services for insurance companies providing precertification,
utilization management and claims administration services. Solis
worked for Orthonet as a utilization management employee providing
medical advice to patients or other individuals with health issues.
She worked over 40 hours in individual workweeks but was not paid
overtime at one-and-one-half times her regular rate of pay for all
overtime hours worked, asserts the complaint. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Ravi Sattiraju, Esq.
      Anthony S. Almeida, Esq.
      THE SATTIRAJU LAW FIRM, P.C.
      116 Village Boulevard, Suite 200
      Princeton, NJ 08540
      Tel: (609) 799-1266
      Fax: (609) 228-5649
      Email: rsattiraju@sattirajulawfirm.com

              - and -

      Douglas M. Werman, Esq.
      Maureen A. Salas, Esq.
      Sarah J. Arendt, Esq.
      WERMAN SALAS P.C.
      77 West Washington, Suite 1402
      Chicago, IL 60602
      Tel: (312) 419-1008
      Email: dwerman@flsalaw.com
             msalas@flsalaw.com

             - and -

      Travis M. Hedgpeth, Esq.
      THE HEDGPETH LAW FIRM, PC
      5438 Rutherglenn Drive
      Houston, TX 77096
      Tel: (512) 417-5716
      Email: travis@hedgpethlaw.com

             - and -

      Jack Siegel, Esq.
      SIEGEL LAW GROUP PLLC
      10440 N. Central Expy., Suite 1040
      Dallas, TX 75231
      Tel: (214) 790-4454
      Fax: (469) 339-0204
      Email: jack@siegellawgroup.biz
      Website: www.4overtimelawyer.com


PHILADELPHIA PARKING: Berger Suit Alleges Malicious Prosecution
---------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel A. Berger, Edward L. Berger, Gordin & Berger, P.C. and 2008
Honda Accord, individually and on behalf of those similarly
situated v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, et. al., Case No.
2:19-cv-01540 (E.D. Pa., April 11, 2019), is brought against the
Defendants for intentional torts, trespass to chattels, malicious
prosecution, violations of federal and state constitution, and
equitable relief.

The Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants violated the Constitution
by seizing vehicles pursuant to Section 12-2405(1) of the
Philadelphia Traffic Code based on being parked on a public street
and having any combination of three or more delinquent parking
tickets.

The PPA enforces and administers the system of parking on behalf of
the City. It is an entity of the Commonwealth and is a separate
corporate body with enumerated powers and duties but is limited to
only doing those things that are delegated to it by City Ordinance.
The PPA has its own office of general counsel which offers legal
advice and sues and defends the PPA during the course of its
operations. In particular, one prime example of a lawful and
appropriate use of the PPA's OGC is to institute actions to sell
cars at public auction that are currently in their possession.

The Plaintiff Daniel was a citizen and resident of Philadelphia.
Place of business at, 1760 Market Street, Suite 608, Philadelphia
PA 19103. The Plaintiff Daniel is the registered owner of the
Plaintiff 2008 Honda Accord.

The Plaintiff Edward was a resident of the State of New Jersey.
Place of business at, 1760 Market Street, Suite 608, Philadelphia
PA 19103.

The Plaintiff Gordin & Berger is a small law firm duly incorporated
under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with a principle
place of business located at 1760 Market Street, Suite 608,
Philadelphia PA 19103.

The Defendant Philadelphia Parking is an agency of the Commonwealth
under Local Agency Law and is a separate "body politic and
corporate established under" 53 Pa.C.S. Ch. 55 created by 1950
Ordinance of the City of Philadelphia with powers enumerated by
law. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Daniel A. Berger, Esq.
      GORDIN & BERGER, P.C.
      1760 Market Street, Suite 608
      Philadelphia, PA 19103
      Tel: (215)564-2031
      Fax: (215)972-5390


PIVOTAL SOFTWARE: Nhung Tran Says IPO Documents Misleading
----------------------------------------------------------
A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Pivotal
Software, Inc., asserting strict liability claims under sections
11, 12, and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 against Pivotal,
certain of Pivotal officers and directors, and the underwriters of
the initial public offering (IPO). The Plaintiff brings the
securities class action on behalf of all who purchased or otherwise
acquired Phrotal common stock pursuant or traceable to the
registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with
Pivotal's April 2018 IPO initial public offering.

In April 2018, the Defendants announced the IPO, issuing over 42
million shares of Pivotal common stock to the investing public at
$15.00 per share, all pursuant to the Registration Statement.

The Registration Statement contained untrue statements of material
fact and omitted to state material facts both required by governing
regulations and necessary to make the statements made therein not
misleading. Principally, the Registration Statement failed to
disclose that the Company was suffering from deferred sales,
lengthening sales cycles, and diminished gtowth as its customers
and the industry's sentiment shifted away from Phrotal's principal,
yet outdated and inadequate, offering because it was incompatible
with the industry-standard platform, the lawsuit says.

The case is captioned as NHUNG TRAN, Individually and on Behalf of
All Others Similarly Situated, the Plaintiff, vs. Pivotal Software,
Inc.; Robert Mee; Cynthia Gaylor; Paul Maritz; Michael S. Dell;
Zane Rowe; Egon Durban; William D. Green; Marcy Klevorn; Khozema Z.
Shipchandler; Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC; Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC;
C1tigroup Global Markets Inc.; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith Incorporated; Barclays Capital Inc.; Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC; RBC Capital Markets, LLC; UBS Securities LLC; Wells
Fargo Securities, LLC; KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc.; William Blair
& Company, LLC; Mischler Financial Group, Inc.; Samuel A.· Ramirez
& Company, Inc.; Siebert Cisneros Shank & Co., LLC; Williams
Capital Group, L.P., the Defendants, Case No. CGC-19-576806 (Cal.
Super. Ct., June 18, 2019).

Pivotal is a cloud platform technology company headquartered in San
Francisco, California. Pivotal is incorporated under the laws of
Delaware, and its common stock trades on the NYSE exchange under
the ticket "PVTL."[BN]

Attorneys for the Plaintiffs are:

          David W. Hall, Esq.
          HEDIN HALL LLP
          Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400
          San Francisco, CA 94104
          Telephone: 415 766-3534
          Facsimile: 415 402-0058
          E-mail: dhall@hedinhall.com

               - and -

          Brian Schall, Esq.
          THE SCHALL LAW FIRM
          1880 Century Park East, Suite 404
          Los Angeles, CA 9006 7
          Telephone: (310) 301-3335
          Facsimile: (310) 388-0192
          E-mail: brian@schallfum.com

PURDUE PHARMA: Brant Sues over Opioid Distribution in Arizona
-------------------------------------------------------------
A class action complaint has been filed against Purdue Pharma L.P.,
McKesson Corporation, and other opioid manufacturers and
distributors for public nuisance, negligence, civil conspiracy and
products liability. The case is captioned SHELBY L. BRANT,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND AND GUARDIAN OF BABY L.A.Z., ON
BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs,
v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. ET AL, Defendants, Case No. 1:19-op-45494-DAP
(N.D. Ohio, June 17, 2019).

Prenatal exposure to opioids causes severe withdrawal symptoms and
lasting developmental impacts. The first days of Baby L.A.Z.’s
life were spent in excruciating pain as doctors weaned the infant
from opioid addiction. Baby L.A.Z. and their mother are victims of
the opioid crisis that has ravaged Arizona, causing immense
suffering to those born addicted to opioids and great expense to
those forced to deal with the aftermath. At birth, Baby L.A.Z. was
diagnosed with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome a condition suffered by
babies of mothers addicted to opioids. Baby L.A.Z. was forced to
endure a painful start to their life; crying excessively, arching
their back, refusing to feed, and shaking. Accordingly, Plaintiff
Shelby L. Brant brings this class action to eliminate the hazard to
public health and safety caused by the opioid epidemic and to abate
the nuisance caused by Defendants’ false, negligent and unfair
marketing and/or unlawful diversion of prescription opioids.
Plaintiff further seeks the equitable relief of medical monitoring
to provide this class of infants the monitoring of developmental
issues that will almost inevitably appear as they grow older and
equitable relief in the form of funding for services and
treatment.

McKesson Corporation has its principal place of business in San
Francisco, California and is incorporated under the laws of
Delaware. The company has distributed substantial amounts of
prescription opioids to providers and retailers in the state of
Arizona. Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, Purdue Pharma L.P.
is a limited partnership organized under the laws of Delaware. The
company manufactures, promotes, sells, and distributes opioids such
as OxyContin, MS Contin, Dilaudid/Dilaudid HP, Butrans, Hysingla
ER, and Targiniq ER in the United States. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Celeste Brustowicz, Esq.
     Stephen Wussow, Esq.
     COOPER LAW FIRM
     1525 Religious Street
     New Orleans, LA 70130
     Telephone: (504) 399-0009
     Facsimile: (504) 309-6989
     E-mail: cbrustowicz@sch-llc.com

             - and -

     Kevin W. Thompson, Esq.
     David R. Barney, Jr., Esq.
     THOMPSON BARNEY LAW FIRM
     2030 Kanawha Boulevard, East
     Charleston, WV 25311
     Telephone: (304) 343-4401
     Facsimile: (304) 343-4405
     E-mail: kwthompson@gmail.com

             - and -

     Donald E. Creadore, Esq.
     CREADORE LAW FIRM
     450 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1408
     New York, NY 10123
     Telephone: (212) 355-7200
     E-mail: donald@creadorelawfirm.com

             - and -

     Scott R. Bickford, Esq.
     Spencer R. Doody, Esq.
     MARTZELL, BICKFORD & CENTOLA
     338 Lafayette Street
     New Orleans, LA 70130
     Telephone: (504) 581-9065
     Facsimile: (504) 581-7635
     E-mail: srb@mbfirm.com

             - and -

     Kent Harrison Robbins, Esq.
     THE LAW OFFICES OF KENT HARRISON ROBBINS, P.A.
     242 Northeast 27th Street
     Miami, FL 33137
     Telephone: (305) 532-0500
     Facsimile: (305) 531-0150
     E-mail: khr@khrlawoffices.com
             ereyes@khrlawoffices.com
             assistant@khrlawoffices.com


PURDUE PHARMA: DeLancey Sues over Unfair Marketing of Opioids
-------------------------------------------------------------
A class action complaint has been filed against Purdue Pharma L.P.
and other opioid manufacturers and distributors for public
nuisance, negligence, civil conspiracy, and products liability. The
case is captioned CHRISTINA DELANCEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT
FRIEND AND GUARDIAN OF BABY A.J.W., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL
OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs, v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. ET AL,
Case No. 1:19-op-45480-DAP (N.D. Ohio, June 15, 2019). At birth,
Baby A.J.W. was diagnosed with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome, a
condition suffered by babies of mothers addicted to opioids. Baby
A.J.W.'s mother was prescribed Defendants' opioids prior to Baby
A.J.W.'s gestation, resulting in her opioid addiction and Baby
A.J.W.'s opioid exposure during gestation. Accordingly, Plaintiff
Christina DeLancy brings this action to eliminate the hazard to
public health and safety caused by the opioid epidemic and to abate
the nuisance caused by Defendants' false, negligent and unfair
marketing and/or unlawful diversion of prescription opioids.
Plaintiff further seeks the equitable relief of medical monitoring
to provide this class of infants the monitoring of developmental
issues that will almost inevitably appear as they grow older and
equitable relief in the form of funding for services and treatment.


Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, Purdue Pharma L.P. is a
limited partnership organized under the laws of Delaware. The
company manufactures, promotes, sells, and distributes opioids such
as OxyContin, MS Contin, Dilaudid/Dilaudid HP, Butrans, Hysingla
ER, and Targiniq ER in the United States. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Celeste Brustowicz, Esq.
     Stephen Wussow, Esq.
     COOPER LAW FIRM
     1525 Religious Street
     New Orleans, LA 70130
     Telephone: (504) 399-0009
     Facsimile: (504) 309-6989
     E-mail: cbrustowicz@sch-llc.com

             - and -

     Kevin W. Thompson, Esq.
     David R. Barney, Jr., Esq.
     THOMPSON BARNEY LAW FIRM
     2030 Kanawha Boulevard, East
     Charleston, WV 25311
     Telephone: (304) 343-4401
     Facsimile: (304) 343-4405
     Email: kwthompson@gmail.com

            - and -

     Donald E. Creadore, Esq.
     CREADORE LAW FIRM
     450 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1408
     New York, NY 10123
     Telephone: (212) 355-7200
     E-mail: donald@creadorelawfirm.com

             - and -

     Scott R. Bickford, Esq.
     Spencer R. Doody, Esq.
     MARTZELL, BICKFORD & CENTOLA
     338 Lafayette Street
     New Orleans, LA 70130
     Telephone: (504) 581-9065
     Facsimile: (504) 581-7635
     E-mail: srb@mbfirm.com

             - and -

     Kent Harrison Robbins, Esq.
     THE LAW OFFICES OF KENT HARRISON ROBBINS, P.A.
     242 Northeast 27th Street
     Miami, FL 33137
     Telephone: (305) 532-0500
     Facsimile: (305) 531-0150
     E-mail: khr@khrlawoffices.com
             ereyes@khrlawoffices.com
             assistant@khrlawoffices.com


PURDUE PHARMA: DeMaro Seeks Medical Monitoring for Babies with NAS
------------------------------------------------------------------
A class action complaint has been filed against Purdue Pharma L.P.,
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc, and other opioid manufacturers and
distributors for public nuisance, negligence, civil conspiracy, and
products liability in connection with the marketing and
distribution of highly addictive opioids. The case is captioned
SAMANTHA DEMARO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND AND GUARDIAN OF
BABY J.W.L.B., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY
SITUATED, Plaintiffs, v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. ET AL, Case No.
1:19-op-45465-DAP (N.D. Ohio, June 14, 2019).

At birth, Baby J.W.L.B. was diagnosed with Neonatal Abstinence
Syndrome, a condition suffered by babies of mothers addicted to
opioids. Baby J.W.L.B.'s mother was prescribed Defendants' opioids
prior to Baby J.W.L.B.'s gestation, resulting in her opioid
addiction and Baby J.W.L.B.'s opioid exposure during gestation.

Accordingly, Plaintiff Samantha DeMaro brings this class action to
eliminate the hazard to public health and safety caused by the
opioid epidemic and to abate the nuisance caused by Defendants'
false, negligent and unfair marketing and/or unlawful diversion of
prescription opioids. Plaintiff further seeks the equitable relief
of medical monitoring to provide this class of infants the
monitoring of developmental issues that will almost inevitably
appear as they grow older and equitable relief in the form of
funding for services and treatment.

Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, Purdue Pharma L.P. is a
limited partnership organized under the laws of Delaware. The
company manufactures, promotes, sells, and distributes opioids such
as OxyContin, MS Contin, Dilaudid/Dilaudid HP, Butrans, Hysingla
ER, and Targiniq ER in the United States. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Celeste Brustowicz, Esq.
     Stephen Wussow, Esq.
     COOPER LAW FIRM
     1525 Religious Street
     New Orleans, LA 70130
     Telephone: (504) 399-0009
     Facsimile: (504) 309-6989
     E-mail: cbrustowicz@sch-llc.com

             - and -

     Kevin W. Thompson, Esq.
     David R. Barney, Jr., Esq.
     THOMPSON BARNEY LAW FIRM
     2030 Kanawha Boulevard, East
     Charleston, WV 25311
     Telephone: (304) 343-4401
     Facsimile: (304) 343-4405
     Email: kwthompson@gmail.com

            - and -

     Donald E. Creadore, Esq.
     CREADORE LAW FIRM
     450 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1408
     New York, NY 10123
     Telephone: (212) 355-7200
     E-mail: donald@creadorelawfirm.com

             - and -

     Scott R. Bickford, Esq.
     Spencer R. Doody, Esq.
     MARTZELL, BICKFORD & CENTOLA
     338 Lafayette Street
     New Orleans, LA 70130
     Telephone: (504) 581-9065
     Facsimile: (504) 581-7635
     E-mail: srb@mbfirm.com

             - and -

     Kent Harrison Robbins, Esq.
     THE LAW OFFICES OF KENT HARRISON ROBBINS, P.A.
     242 Northeast 27th Street
     Miami, FL 33137
     Telephone: (305) 532-0500
     Facsimile: (305) 531-0150
     E-mail: khr@khrlawoffices.com
             ereyes@khrlawoffices.com
             assistant@khrlawoffices.com


RA MEDICAL SYSTEMS: Schall Law Firm Files Class Action Lawsuit
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm,
announces the filing of a class action lawsuit against Ra Medical
Systems, Inc. (RMED) for violations of the federal securities
laws.

Investors who purchased the Company's shares pursuant to and/or
traceable to the Company's Initial Public Offering in September
2018 (the "IPO") are encouraged to contact the firm before August
6, 2019.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall, or Sherin Mahdavian,
of the Schall Law Firm, 1880 Century Park East, Suite 404, Los
Angeles, CA 90067, at 424-303-1964, to discuss your rights free of
charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at
www.schallfirm.com, or by email at brian@schallfirm.com.

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until
certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If
you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class
member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading
statements to the market. Ra Medical's evaluation of sales
candidates and training for those candidates hired were inadequate.
The Company failed to ensure that candidates hired for sales
positions had sufficient work experience. This resulted in the
Company experiencing a shortage of qualified sales personnel. At
the same time, the Company experienced problems in increasing
catheter production, suffering production delays. Based on the
facts, the Company's public statements were false and materially
misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the
truth about Ra Medical, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses.

Contact:

         Brian Schall, Esq.
         Rina Restaino, Esq.
         The Schall Law Firm
         1880 Century Park East, Suite 404
         Los Angeles, CA 90067
         Phone:
            Office: 310-301-3335
            Cell: 424-303-1964
         Website: www.schallfirm.com
         Email: info@schallfirm.com
                brian@schallfirm.com [GN]


RCI HOSPITALITY: Schall Law Firm Files Class Action Lawsuit
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm,
announces the filing of a class action lawsuit against RCI
Hospitality Holdings, Inc. ("RCI" or "the Company") (NASDAQ: RICK)
for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company's shares between August 10,
2017 and May 10, 2019, inclusive (the "Class Period"), are
encouraged to contact the firm before July 22, 2019.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law
Firm, 1880 Century Park East, Suite 404, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at
424-303-1964, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also
reach us through the firm's website at www.schallfirm.com, or by
email at brian@schallfirm.com.

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until
certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If
you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class
member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading
statements to the market. RCI regularly engaged in transactions
with its CEO, including lending him large sums of money. These
practices could be reasonably expected to lead to heightened
regulatory scrutiny. The Company would be unable to file its
financial statements in a timely manner due to investigations of
these practices. Based on these facts, the Company's public
statements were false and materially misleading throughout the
class period. When the market learned the truth about RCI,
investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses.

Contact:

         Brian Schall, Esq.
         The Schall Law Firm
         1880 Century Park East, Suite 404
         Los Angeles, CA 90067
         Phone:
            Office: 310-301-3335
            Cell: 424-303-1964
         Website: www.schallfirm.com
         Email: info@schallfirm.com
                brian@schallfirm.com [GN]


RETRIEVAL-MASTERS CREDITORS: Faces Lanouette Class Suit in N.Y.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Lanouette, Jane Doe, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.,
Optum360, LLC and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, Case No.
7:19-cv-05216 (S.D.N.Y., June 4, 2019), accuses the Defendants of
violating the consumer protection laws of New Hampshire,
Connecticut, New York, Illinois, North Carolina, Ohio,
Massachusetts, Vermont and California.

The Plaintiffs allege that by failing to implement third-party
safeguards and quality-control mechanisms, Defendant Quest enabled
data thieves to pilfer the account records of persons, who used
their services, at the directions of their medical providers.  The
Plaintiffs contend that the Defendants are jointly and severally
liable for all consequences of this data breach incident.

Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc., is a Florida corporation
with a principal place of business in Elmsford, New York.
Optum360, LLC, is a Delaware limited liability company with a
principal place of business in Eden Prairie, Minnesota.

Quest Diagnostics Incorporated in a Delaware corporation with a
principal place of business in Secaucus, New Jersey.  Quest
Diagnostics is the leading medical laboratory services provider in
the country and the world.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Spencer Sheehan, Esq.
          SHEEHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
          505 Northern Blvd., Suite 311
          Great Neck, NY 11021
          Telephone: (516) 303-0552
          Facsimile: (516) 234-7800
          E-mail: spencer@spencersheehan.com


SMJ CONSTRUCTION: Li Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Under FLSA & NYLL
----------------------------------------------------------------
Zhi Li and Luxiu Sun, individually and on behalf of all other
Employees similarly situated v. SMJ Construction Inc., Steve Kang,
Jane Doe and John Doe # 1-10, Case No. 1:19-cv-05309 (S.D.N.Y.,
June 5, 2019), arises from the Defendants' alleged practice of
failing to pay their employees, including the Plaintiffs, overtime
compensation for all hours worked over 40 each workweek, in
violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the New York Labor Law
and New Jersey Wage and Hour Law.

SMJ Construction Inc. is an out-of-state for profit corporation
whose principal place of business is located in Palisades Park, New
Jersey.  The Individual Defendants are owners, officers, directors
and/or managing agents of SMJ.

SMJ is a construction company established in the state of New
Jersey, serving New York, New York Metropolitan area and New Jersey
with a wide range of interior work.  The Defendant's major clients
contained large companies, including Starbucks, CITYMD Urgent Care
and CAVA.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Hui Chen, Esq.
          HUI CHEN AND ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C.
          136-20 38th Ave., Suite 9E
          Flushing, NY 11354
          Telephone: (718) 463-2666
          E-mail: hui.chen@alum.cardozo.yu.edu


SOMCHAI AND COMPANY: Bao Seeks Overtime Pay, Damages
----------------------------------------------------
Bao Yu Yang, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Somchai and Company Inc., Madee Inc., JC62
Inc., Ampawun Silraksa and Chin Ying Lau, Defendants, Case No.
19-cv-12742, (D. N.J., July 21, 2018), seeks to recover unpaid
minimum wage compensation, unpaid overtime wage compensation,
liquidated damages, prejudgment and post-judgment interest and/or
attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act
of 1938 and the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law.

Defendants operate as "Sky Thai," a Thai Restaurant where Bao
worked as a delivery person at their restaurant located at 62
Morris Street, Jersey City. Plaintiff claims to be denied his
lawful overtime compensation of one and one-half times his regular
rate of pay for all hours worked over forty in a given workweek and
full and accurate records of hours and wages. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      John Troy, Esq.
      Aaron Schweitzer, Esq.
      TROY LAW, PLLC
      41-25 Kissena Boulevard, Suite 119
      Flushing, NY 11355
      Tel: (718) 762-1324
      Fax: (718) 762-1342
      Email: TroyLaw@TroyPllc.Com


SPROUT FINANCIAL: Picow Sues Over Illegal Telemarketing Calls
-------------------------------------------------------------
David Picow, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Sprout Financial, LLC, Defendant, Case No.
19-cv-61285, (S.D. Fla., May 21, 2019) seeks statutory damages and
injunctive relief for violations of the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act.

Sprout is a financial services institution that provides and/or
facilitates secured and unsecured loans, investment and retirement
opportunities and other financial planning services, to consumers
and businesses across the United States. Picow claims to have
received multiple pre-recorded telemarketing calls to his cellular
phone by use of an automatic telephone dialing system without his
permission. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jibrael S. Hindi, Esq.
      Thomas J. Patti, Esq.
      THE LAW OFFICE OF JIBRAEL S. HINDI, PLLC
      110 SE 6th Street
      Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
      Telephone: (954) 907-1136
      Facsimile: (855) 529-9540
      Email: jibrael@jibraellaw.com
             tom@jibraellaw.com


ST. LOUIS, MO: Ruling vs. Inmates Held Over Non-Payment of Bond
---------------------------------------------------------------
Kiersten Willis, writing for Atlanta Black Star, reports that about
six months after a lawsuit was filed against the city of St. Louis,
Missouri, a judge has ruled that jails in the city cannot hold
inmates because they cannot afford to bail themselves out.

The class-action suit was filed on Jan. 28, 2019, with the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.  In it,
plaintiffs David Dixon, Jeffrey Rozelle, Aaron Thurman and Richard
Robards alleged they remained detained in the city's two jails
because they could not muster up the cash for bond.

The inmates alleged in the suit that the city as well as named
defendants that included Commissioner of Corrections Dale Glass and
Sheriff Vernon Betts "violated their constitutional rights to equal
protection and substantive and procedural due process by detaining
them after arrest without an opportunity to challenge the
conditions of their release."

As the suit waged on, Robards and Thurman were released from jail
in February after lawyers came to an agreement give them bail
hearings.

On June 11, 2019, U.S. District Judge Audrey Fleissig determined
St. Louis jails should be prohibited from holding inmates just
because they can't bond themselves out. Dixon, Rozelle, Thurman and
Robards were granted class-action status, according to the St.
Louis Post-Dispatch.

Flessing wrote about the sheriff's deputies who instruct inmates
not to speak or ask for a bond reduction at their initial hearing.

"Ample evidence in the record shows that the duty judge presiding
over initial appearances rarely considers information about an
arrestee's financial circumstances because the bond commissioner
rarely provides it and arrestees are instructed not to speak," she
wrote.

Now officials have one week to hold new detention hearings for
current inmates in the city's two jails. Additionally, the ruling
notes any newly arrested persons are required to have a hearing
within 48 hours of their detention. In her decision, Fleissig wrote
that inmates can continue to be held if they are deemed a danger to
the community or if there is no other option to guarantee they
arrive at their hearing.

St. Louis officials, citing the administrative difficulty of
holding hundreds of bond hearings on such a short time frame and
the possibility that they prevail upon appeal, asked the judge on
June 13 to extend her one-week deadline to 30 days or put her order
on hold.

"The city has operated this racist and predatory scheme for decades
and cavalierly destroyed the lives of countless thousands of
people, disproportionately impacted black people, and not made St.
Louis safer," said one of the plaintiffs' attorneys, Thomas Harvey
of the Advancement Project, in a statement to The St. Louis
American. "This is the first step in ending wealth-based pretrial
detention and closing the Workhouse [the St. Louis Medium Security
Institution] permanently." [GN]


ST. TROPEZ II: Palacios Sues over Unpaid Overtime, Medical Leave
----------------------------------------------------------------
PATRICIA PALACIOS, and other similarly situated individuals, the
Plaintiffs, v. ST. TROPEZ II, LLC; ST. TROPEZ CONDOMINIUM I
ASSOCIATION, INC.; ST. TROPEZ CONDOMINIUM II ASSOCIATION, INC.; ST.
TROPEZ CONDOMINIUM III ASSOCIATION, INC.; ALL THAT SPARKLES
JANITORIAL SERVICES, INC.; and ROSARIO MARTINEZ, the Defendants,
Case No. 1:19-cv-22528-XXXX (S.D. Fla., June 18, 2019), seeks to
recover money damages for unpaid overtime and retaliation under the
laws of the United States and the Family and Medical Leave Act of
1993.

According to the complaint, the Plaintiff's daughter was diagnosed
with a serious illness. The Plaintiff informed Defendants of her
daughter's serious illness and that she needed to take leave to
care for her. The Defendants failed to provide Plaintiff with any
FMLA paperwork or advise Plaintiff of her right to take leave under
the FMLA.

The Plaintiff took leave to care for her seriously ill daughter.
She gave proper notice to Defendants by informing them of her
daughter's medical condition and provided enough information for
Defendants to know that her leave may be covered by the FMLA.

The Plaintiff communicated with Defendants regarding her inability
to return to work because she had to care for her daughter.

The Defendants terminated Plaintiff because she took leave, which
should have been designated as FMLA leave, or because she attempted
to take FMLA leave. Alternatively, the fact that Plaintiff took
leave, which should have been designated as FMLA leave, or because
she attempted to take FMLA leave, was a motivating factor that
caused Plaintiff's termination.

As a direct and proximate result of the intentional violations by
Defendants of rights under the FMLA, Plaintiff has been damaged.
The Defendants willfully and intentionally refused to pay Plaintiff
her legally owed overtime wages as required by the laws of the
United States and remain owing Plaintiff these wages, the lawsuit
says.[BN]

Attorneys for the Plaintiff:

          R. Martin Saenz, Esq.
          SAENZ & ANDERSON, PLLC
          20900 NE 30 Avenue, Suite 800
          Aventura, FL 33180
          Telephone: 305 503 5131
          Facsimile: 888 270 5549
          E-mail: msaenz@saenzanderson.com

STA MANAGEMENT: Mata Seeks to Recover Minimum and Overtime Wages
----------------------------------------------------------------
JESUS MATA, individually and on behalf of similarly situated
persons v. STA MANAGEMENT, LLC d/b/a "Domino's Pizza" and AMER
ASMAR, Case No. 2:19-cv-11662-NGE-DRG (E.D. Mich., June 5, 2019),
seeks to recover unpaid minimum wages and overtime hours owed to
the Plaintiff and similarly situated delivery drivers employed by
the Defendants at their Domino's Pizza stores.

STA Management, LLC, is a Michigan Limited Liability Company.  Amer
Asmar is an owner, officer, and director of the Corporate
Defendant.

The Defendants operate numerous Domino's franchise stores.  The
Defendants employ delivery drivers, who use their own automobiles
to deliver pizza and other food items to their customers.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          J. Forester, Esq.
          FORESTER HAYNIE PLLC
          1701 N. Market Street, Suite 210
          Dallas, TX 75202
          Telephone: (214) 210-2100
          Facsimile: (214) 346-5909
          E-mail: jay@foresterhaynie.com

               - and -

          David M. Blanchard, Esq.
          Frances J. Hollander, Esq.
          BLANCHARD & WALKER, PLLC
          221 N. Main Street, Suite 300
          Ann Arbor, MI 48104
          Telephone: (734) 929-4313
          E-mail: blanchard@bwlawonline.com
                  hollander@bwlawonline.com


STAR BRANDS: Altes Sues Over Harmful Oil in Pretzels
----------------------------------------------------
Tiffni Altes on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Star Brands North America, Inc., Defendant,
Case No. 19-cv-04399, (C.D. Cal., May 21, 2019), seeks damages as a
result of breach of implied warranty and for violation of
California's Unfair Competition Law.

Star Brands owns and controls the DeMets Candy Company and under
the DeMets brand manufactures, markets, and sells Flipz Pretzel
products. Altez alleges that Star Brands made Flipz with partially
hydrogenated oil, an unsafe, unapproved food additive. Flipz were
sold in stores throughout California and Plaintiff regularly
purchased and consumed Flipz. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Gregory S. Weston, Esq.
      THE WESTON FIRM
      1405 Morena Blvd., Suite 201
      San Diego, CA 92110
      Telephone: (619) 798-2006
      Facsimile: (619) 343-2789
      Email: greg@westonfirm.com


SUNLANDS TECHNOLOGY: Rosen Continues to Probe Securities Claims
---------------------------------------------------------------
Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to
investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders
of Sunlands Technology Group (NYSE: STG) resulting from allegations
that Sunlands may have issued materially misleading business
information to the investing public.

On March 23, 2018, Sunlands completed its Initial Public Offering
("IPO"), issuing 13 million American depositary receipts ("ADRs")
priced at $11.50 per share.  On May 28, 2019, Sunlands announced
its financial and operating results for the first quarter of 2019,
which included a net loss of $16.8 million, and advised investors
that the Company's "new student enrollments declined, and gross
billings were down 28.6% year-over-year."

Following this news, Sunlands' ADR price fell $0.19 per share, or
6.46%, to close at $2.75 per share on May 29, 2019, representing a
total decline of $8.75 per share, or 76.09%, from the IPO price.

Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action lawsuit to recover
losses suffered by Sunlands investors. If you purchased shares of
Sunlands please visit the firm's website at
http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1598.htmlto join the
class action.

Contact:

         Laurence Rosen, Esq.
         Phillip Kim, Esq.
         The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
         275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor
         New York, NY 10016
         Phone: (212) 686-1060
         Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
         Fax: (212) 202-3827
         Website: www.rosenlegal.com
         Email: lrosen@rosenlegal.com
                pkim@rosenlegal.com
                cases@rosenlegal.com [GN]


TELLURIAN INC: Chambers v. BOD Seeks to Halt Stock Issuance
-----------------------------------------------------------
Robert Chambers, on behalf of himself and all other similarly
situated stockholders of Tellurian Inc., Plaintiff, v. Charif
Souki, Martin Houston, Meg Gentle, Dillon J. Ferguson, Diana
Derycz-Kessler, Brooke Peterson, Don Turkleson and Eric Festa,
Defendants, Case No. 2019-0375, (Del. Ch., May 14, 2019), seeks to
enjoin the stockholder vote on the approval of a $200 million
issuance of common stock to Total S.A.

Tellurian is an independent natural gas company based in Houston,
Texas where Total S.A. and its subsidiary Total Delaware, Inc.
beneficially own approximately 19% of Tellurian's outstanding
shares.

The proxy statement issued in connection with soliciting
stockholder support for the Share Issuance allegedly failed to
disclose any information concerning the process and/or negotiations
between Tellurian and Total concerning the Common Stock Purchase
Agreement or the alternatives, potential conflicts of interest
harbored by Total and Festa and financial analysis prepared for the
Board in connection with approval of the Common Stock Purchase
Agreement and the Share Issuance. [BN]

Chambers is represented by:

      Ryan M. Ernst, Esq.
      O'KELLY ERNST & JOYCE, LLC
      901 N. Market Street, Suite 1000
      Wilmington, DE 19801
      Tel: (302) 778-4000
      Email: rernst@oelegal.com

             - and -

      Donald J. Enright, Esq.
      Elizabeth K. Tripodi, Esq.
      LEVI &KORSINSKY, LLP
      1101 30th Street, N.W., Suite 115
      Washington, D.C. 20007
      Telephone: (202) 524-4290
      Facsimile: (202) 333-2121
      Email: denright@zlk.com
             etripodi@zlk.com


TORRENT PHARMA: Sanders Sues Over Carcinogen in Hypertension Meds
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ira Sanders, Joseph Glenn Cummings, Solomon Zeller, Rosa Burton and
Damita Owens, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiffs, v. Torrent Pharma, Inc., Defendant, Case No.
19-cv-12745 (D. N.J., May 21, 2019), seeks compensatory, statutory
and punitive damages, prejudgment interest on all amounts awarded,
restitution and all other forms of equitable monetary relief,
injunctive relief and reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses and
costs of suit resulting from negligence, fraud, unjust enrichment,
breach of implied and express warranty and for violation of South
Carolina's Unfair Trade Practices Act, and New York general
business laws.

Torrent is alleged of manufacturing, distributing and selling
losartan-containing generic prescription medications contaminated
with N-Nitrosodiethylamine and N-Methylnitrosobutyric acid, which
are carcinogenic and liver-damaging impurities. Originally marketed
under the brand names Cozaar (Losartan Potassium), Tozaar
(Hydrochlorothiazide and Losartan) and Tozam (Amlodipine and
Losartan), losartan is a prescription medication mainly used for
the treatment of high blood pressure, diabetic kidney disease,
congestive heart failure, and left ventricular enlargement, among
other issues. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Andrew Obergfell, Esq.
      BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
      369 Lexington Avenue, 10th Floor
      New York, NY 10017
      Telephone: (212) 989-9113
      Facsimile: (212) 989-9163
      E-Mail: aobergfell@bursor.com


TRINITY PACKAGING: Robertson Suit Seeks Unpaid Overtime Wages
-------------------------------------------------------------
Claude Robertson, individually, and on behalf of others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Trinity Packaging Corporation, Defendant,
Case No. 19-cv-00659, (W.D. N.Y., May 21, 2019) seeks to recover
unpaid minimum wage, premium overtime compensation, liquidated
damages, prejudgment and post-judgment interest, and reasonable
attorneys' fees and costs for violation of the Fair Labor Standards
Act.

Trinity Packaging manufactures and markets plastic packaging
products, heavy duty industrial films, as well as specialty films
and lamination products. Robertson worked for Trinity as a machine
operator. He claims to have rendered uncompensated off-the-clock
work before and/or after his scheduled shifts and alleges that
Trinity always rounds down time spent performing pre-shift and
post-shift work, under fifteen minutes and does not pay for
increments of time worked. He also claims one and one-half times
his hourly rate for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jason T. Brown, Esq.
      BROWN, LLC
      Jersey City, NJ 07302
      Tel: (877) 561-0000
      Fax: (855) 582-5297
      Email: jtb@jtblawgroup.com


UNITED STATES: Brito Files Petition for Habeas Corpus
-----------------------------------------------------
A Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus has been filed in the case
captioned Gilberto Pereira Brito, Florentin Avila Lucas, Jacky
Celicourt, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly
situated, Petitioners v. William Barr, Attorney General, U.S.
Department of Justice, Marcos Charles Acting Field Office Director,
Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Mark Morgan Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement, Kevin McAleenan Secretary, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security, James McHenry Director, Executive Office of
Immigration Review, U.S. Department of Justice, Antone Moniz
Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility,
Yolanda Smith Superintendent of the Suffolk County House of
Corrections, Steven Souza Superintendent of the Bristol County
House of Corrections, Christopher Brackett Superintendent of the
Strafford County Department of Corrections, Lori Streeter
Superintendent of the Franklin County House of Corrections,
Respondents, Case No. 1:19-cv-11314 (D. Mass., June 13, 2019).

The nature of suit is stated as Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee.

William Pelham Barr is an American attorney serving as the 85th
United States Attorney General in the Donald Trump administration
since February 14, 2019.[BN]

The Petitioners are represented by:

     Susan M. Finegan, Esq.
     Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, PC
     One Financial Center, 43rd Floor
     Boston, MA 02111
     Phone: (617) 542-6000
     Fax: (617) 542-2241
     Email: sfinegan@mintz.com


UNITED STATES: CAVC Certifies 1st Class Action
----------------------------------------------
On June 13, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
(CAVC) certified its first class action.  The case, styled Godsey
v. Wilkie, was a petition for extraordinary relief brought by
Covington & Burling LLP and the National Veterans Legal Services
Program (NVLSP).

The petition was filed on behalf of veterans James A. Godsey, Jr.,
Jeffery S. Henke, Thomas J. Marshall, Pamela Whitfield. It sought
relief for all similarly situated VA benefits claimants who have
filed an appeal to VA's highest tribunal, the Board of Veterans'
Appeals (Board), and since have suffered extended delays waiting
for VA to begin moving their appeals forward in a process called
"certification."

The CAVC partially granted the petition in the same order that it
certified the class action, concluding that 18-month or longer VA
delays to begin that process are "per se unreasonable." "Such
delays are particularly intolerable," the Court stated, "because
they consist of nothing but waiting in line: ... no action
whatsoever on the part of VA" while the veterans have continued to
wait.

"CAVC's order certifying a class action for the first time in its
30-year history is a landmark moment, and will help ensure that our
Veterans and their families have more access to the justice they
deserve" said NVLSP Executive Director Bart Stichman.  "It's been a
long time coming.  At last, this precedential order opens the door
for veterans to receive efficient, consistent and fair
adjudications just as Congress intended."

Background

On November 15, 2017, James A. Godsey, Jr., Jeffery S. Henke,
Thomas J. Marshall, and Pamela Whitfield, represented by Covington
and NVLSP, filed a petition for extraordinary relief on behalf of
themselves and a putative class of similarly situated veterans.

The petitioners stated that they had each filed an appeal to the
Board and that, as of the date of the petition, had suffered a
multi-year delay waiting for the VA to certify their appeals.

In their filing, the petitioners asserted that the Secretary's
failure to timely certify their appeals to the Board violated their
right to procedural due process under the Fifth Amendment,
constituted agency action unreasonably delayed and violated a
statutory right to have their appeals "considered and decided [by
the Board] in regular order according to its place upon the
[Board's] docket."  Moreover, the petitioners stated that the
"extreme" certification delays were likely encountered by hundreds,
if not thousands, of claimants nationwide. "Certification" delays
of that magnitude, they asserted, are unreasonable in all cases.

In a 2-1 decision, a three-judge panel of the CAVC noted a split in
the court regarding how to evaluate proposed classes. The panel
majority narrowed the proposed Godseyclass to veterans for whom VA
has not begunthe process of certifying appeals, filed at least 18
months ago, to the Board.

It concluded that, whatever the case might be for the broader class
that the petitioners proposed, this narrower class meets all
prevailing criteria for class actions. In its discussion of class
certification, it stated: "[A] class action decision is a more
efficient and effective vehicle for resolving this case than a
precedential decision focused on an individual veteran's case."

Additionally, when weighing the merits of the class petition, the
court did not mince words. "[W]e are not content to wait for the
Secretary to remedy these unreasonable delays on his own. The
Secretary has had many years to act and initiate pre-certification
review of class members' cases, and he has failed to do so. Ms.
Whitfield, for example, was forced to wait over six years for the
Secretary to act on her Substantive Appeal based on no fault of her
own. Simply put: the time has come for judicial intervention."

The court granted the petition's sought relief on the basis of
unreasonable delay, determining that it did not need to consider
the petitioners' other arguments.

Under the court's order, VA must review and move forward all class
members' appeals by October 11, 2019. It also must file a status
update with the court by August 12, 2019. The court's order
appoints Covington and NVLSP as class counsel.

About NVLSP

The National Veterans Legal Services Program (NVLSP) is an
independent, nonprofit veterans service organization that has
served active duty military personnel and veterans since 1981.
NVLSP strives to ensure that our nation honors its commitment to
its 22 million veterans and active duty personnel by ensuring they
have the benefits they have earned through their service to our
country. NVLSP has represented veterans in lawsuits that compelled
enforcement of the law where the VA or other military services
denied benefits to veterans in violation of the law. NVLSP's
success in these lawsuits has resulted in more than $5.2 billion
dollars being awarded in disability, death and medical benefits to
hundreds of thousands of veterans and their survivors. NVLSP offers
training for attorneys and other advocates; connects veterans and
active duty personnel with pro bono legal help when seeking
disability benefits; publishes the nation's definitive guide on
veteran benefits; and represents and litigates for veterans and
their families before the VA, military discharge review agencies
and federal courts. [GN]


UNITED STATES: Ruling vs. Abortion Policy for Immigrants Upheld
---------------------------------------------------------------
Jessica Gresko, writing for PBS NewsHour, reports that the policy,
which dates to 2017, prohibited shelters from facilitating
abortions for children held in government shelters after entering
the country illegally. The policy has not been in force since March
2018, when a judge blocked it, writing that the government couldn't
implement a policy that strips minors of the right to make their
own reproductive choices. On June 14, a three-judge panel of the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld
that judge's ruling.

"DHS allows pregnant women in immigration custody to obtain
abortions, but the policy had been different for minors.

"We are unanimous in rejecting the government's position that its
denial of abortion access can be squared with Supreme Court
precedent," the opinion says. The Supreme Court first announced the
right to an abortion in its 1973 Roe v. Wade case, and subsequent
rulings have upheld it.

The opinion for the panel of judges -- Sri Srinivasan, Robert
Wilkins and Laurence Silberman -- was unsigned. Beyond that
agreement, however, Silberman wrote a dissent to explain why he
wouldn't have allowed the case to go forward as a class action. And
he argued in support of giving officials a limited window to
transfer a minor out of government custody to the care of a
sponsor, where the child could then obtain an abortion without the
government's assistance. Srinivasan and Wilkins were appointed by
President Barack Obama and Silberman by President Ronald Reagan.

The Trump administration could now ask the full U.S. Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to hear the case. It
could also appeal to the Supreme Court. But Justice Brett Kavanaugh
likely wouldn't take part in the case. That's because he ruled on
the case at an earlier stage as a judge on the D.C. Circuit, where
he made the argument Silberman repeated about transferring a minor
to a sponsor's care. That would leave eight justices, four liberals
and four conservatives, to rule on the case.

The case against the administration's policy was brought by the
American Civil Liberties Union, which represented several pregnant
minors who were seeking abortions. In those instances, teens who
sought abortions were ultimately able to obtain them. And since the
judge's order in 2018 blocking the policy, other minors in
government custody who have sought abortions have been able to get
them.

"The Trump administration's cruel policy of blocking young
immigrant women in federal custody from accessing abortion was a
blatant abuse of power," said Brigitte Amiri, deputy director of
the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project, in a statement after the
ruling. "We are relieved that today's ruling continues to prevent
the policy from taking effect while the case proceeds, and allows
the case to proceed as a class action as we continue this fight."

The Department of Justice declined to comment on the ruling. A
spokesman for the office within the U.S. Department of Health &
Human Services that is responsible for sheltering children who
illegally enter the country unaccompanied by a parent, said the
decision is being reviewed. DHS allows pregnant women in
immigration custody to obtain abortions, but the policy had been
different for minors. [GN]


UNITED STATES: Sued in Boston Over Detention of Immigrants
----------------------------------------------------------
Joe Dwinell, writing for Boston Herald, reports that a new lawsuit
filed in federal court in Boston alleges the federal government is
unconstitutionally detaining illegal immigrants due to "flawed
detention hearings" in which immigrants have to prove they're not a
danger to the public.

The proposed class action lawsuit -- filed by Mintz Levin and the
ACLU on behalf of immigrants currently detained in Massachusetts --
accuses U.S. Attorney General William Barr, federal immigration
authorities and five county correctional facilities in
Massachusetts of violating the Constitution by requiring illegal
immigrants at bond hearings to prove they aren't a danger and a
flight risk in order to be released.

ICE makes an initial custody determination to decide if an illegal
immigrant should be detained or released on bond. Immigrants may
request a "custody redetermination" of ICE's decision before an
immigration judge, known as a bond hearing.

"At those hearings the individuals bear the burden to prove that
they should not be jailed because they are not a danger to the
community and not a flight risk," according to the 113-page suit.

The proposed class action would include all immigrants detained
within Massachusetts and those who appear in Boston Immigration
Court.

The Herald reported that the illegal immigrant population grew more
in Massachusetts than any other state from 2007 to 2017 -- a 60,000
spike that costs taxpayers and risks public safety, legal
immigration, advocates say. [GN]


UNIVERSAL MUSIC: King Holmes to Pursue Suit Over 2008 Fire
----------------------------------------------------------
Jem Aswad, writing for Variety, reports that a Los Angeles law firm
representing several Universal Music recording artists affected by
the 2008 fire that destroyed a huge number of master recordings is
expected to file a lawsuit.

Howard King told Variety that he expects to sue for negligence and
other torts.  He declined to identify his clients, saying the list
has not been finalized yet.

"These artists entrusted Universal with their life's work, with
some expectation those would be protected," said King, a partner at
King, Holmes, Paterno & Soriano.  "There's some duty to protect
that Universal, we learned, breached.  Then they compounded the
problem by absolutely hiding the fact that these valuable masters
had been lost."

Universal Music did not immediately respond to Variety's request
for comment. King's plan to sue was first reported by the Los
Angeles Times.

King told the paper he had "more than 10 but fewer than 100
clients." He said he expected to file individual lawsuits on behalf
of clients, rather than class action suits.

The extent of the fire's damage was revealed earlier this week in a
New York Times article. The fire, which took place on June 1, 2008
on the backlot of Universal Studios Hollywood, destroyed "almost
all of the master recordings stored in the vault … including
those produced by some of the most famous musicians since the
1940s, [likely including] masters by Billie Holiday, Louis
Armstrong, Duke Ellington, Al Jolson, Bing Crosby, Ella Fitzgerald
and Judy Garland; as well as some of Chuck Berry's greatest
recordings, the masters of some of Aretha Franklin's first
appearances on record, almost of all of Buddy Holly's masters and
John Coltrane's masters in the Impulse Records collection. Also
lost were recordings by Ray Charles, B.B. King, the Four Tops, Joan
Baez, Neil Diamond, Sonny and Cher, Joni Mitchell, Cat Stevens,
Gladys Knight and the Pips, Al Green, Elton John, Eric Clapton,
Jimmy Buffett, the Eagles, Aerosmith, Rufus and Chaka Khan, Barry
White, Patti LaBelle, Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers, the Police,
Sting, Steve Earle, R.E.M., Janet Jackson, Guns N' Roses, Mary J.
Blige, No Doubt, Nine Inch Nails, Snoop Dogg, Nirvana, Beck, Sheryl
Crow, Tupac Shakur, Eminem, 50 Cent and the Roots."

In response, UMG issued a statement disputing the characterization
of the damage it caused to the company's archives, saying the
article contains "numerous inaccuracies, misleading statements,
contradictions and fundamental misunderstandings of the scope of
the incident and affected assets. While there are constraints
preventing us from publicly addressing some of the details of the
fire that occurred at NBCUniversal Studios facility more than a
decade ago, the incident -- while deeply unfortunate -- never
affected the availability of the commercially released music nor
impacted artists' compensation."

"The claims of the people who have lost their futures in some
respects are far more significant than would be dealt with in a
class action," King told the paper. "The claims of our clients are
significant enough to justify individual lawsuits." Another
attorney, Ed McPherson, Esq. -- emcpherson@mcpherson-llp.com -- of
McPherson LLP, representing entertainment clients, told the paper
he has heard from numerous musicians concerned about the fate of
recordings they may have lost. He said, "We are definitely
exploring all options."[GN]


USPTO: Morinville Sues over SAWS Flag on Patent Application
-----------------------------------------------------------
PAUL MORINVILLE, 3290 Ridge Road, Highland, IN 46322, and GILBERT
P. HYATT, 7335 Tara Avenue, Las Vegas, NV 89117, the Plaintiffs, v.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, 600 Dulany Street,
Alexandria, VA 22314, the Defendant, Case No. 1:19-cv-01779 (D.
Colo., June 18, 2019), seeks monetary relief, as authorized by the
Privacy Act, and declaratory relief on behalf of the class of all
patent applicants whose applications were flagged under the
Sensitive Application Warning System.

In the mid-1990s, the PTO established a secret program called the
"Sensitive Application Warning System," or "SAWS," under which it
blocked issuance of patent applications identified as "sensitive"
by its personnel. A SAWS flag served as a scarlet letter for patent
applications, alerting PTO personnel that a flagged application was
considered to be an abusive "submarine" application or otherwise
objectionable. As a result, flagged applications were delayed and
prejudiced in their prosecution, injuring their owners. Despite the
prejudice and injury to patent applicants caused by SAWS flags, the
PTO never disclosed to applicants that their applications were
flagged, much less the SAWS reports that provided the purported
factual basis for flagging. Patent applicants were thereby denied
the ability to challenge the flagging of their applications and the
adverse consequences of the flagging, or even to dispute the
factual basis for the PTO's determination to flag applications.

The PTO's withholding of SAWS reports and SAWS flags from patent
applicants whose applications were flagged under SAWS violates the
Privacy Act. The Privacy Act requires agencies, including the PTO,
to "maintain all records which are used by the agency in making any
determination about any individual with such accuracy, relevance,
timeliness, and completeness as is reasonably necessary to assure
fairness to the individual in the determination." The PTO's failure
to place SAWS reports and SAWS flags in patent application files
denied applicants a fair chance to contest PTO's flagging
decisions, as well as the numerous adverse consequences with
respect to actions on their applications that flowed from the entry
of a SAWS flag, the lawsuit says. [BN]

Attorneys for the Plaintiffs are:

          Andrew M. Grossman, Esq.
          Mark W. DeLaquil, Esq.
          BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
          1050 Connecticut Ave., N.W., Suite 1100
          Washington, D.C. 20036
          Telephone: (202) 861-1697
          E-mail: agrossman@bakerlaw.com
                  mdelaquil@bakerlaw.com

VISTA HOTEL: Stewart Asserts Breach of Disabilities Act
-------------------------------------------------------
Vista Hotel II Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit filed pursuant
to the Americans with Disabilities Act. The case is styled as John
Stewart, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. Vista Hotel II Inc doing business as: Best
Western St. Augustine Beach Inn, Defendant, Case No.
3:19-cv-00734-BJD-JBT (M.D. Fla., June 19, 2019).

Best Western St. Augustine Beach Inn is a Spanish-style Hotel.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

   Jessica Lynn Kerr, Esq.
   The Advocacy Group, LLC
   200 SE 6th St Ste 504
   Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3424
   Tel: (954) 282-1858
   Fax: (844) 786-3694
   Email: jkerr@advocacypa.com



VIVIAN HORAN: Web Site Not Blind-Friendly, Matzura Suit Says
------------------------------------------------------------
STEVEN MATZURA AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY
SITUATED v. VIVIAN HORAN FINE ART LLC, Case No. 1:19-cv-05248
(S.D.N.Y., June 4, 2019), arises from the Defendant's alleged
failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its Web
site--http://www.vivianhoran.com/--tobe fully accessible to and
independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or
visually-impaired people.

Vivian Horan Fine Art LLC is a Domestic Limited Liability Company
registered to do business in the state of New York with a principal
executive office located in New York City.

The Defendant operates its art gallery, as well as the Web site and
advertises, markets, and operates in the state of New York and
throughout the United States.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq.
          Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq.
          GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES
          150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR
          New York, NY 10003
          Telephone: (212) 228-9795
          Facsimile: (212) 982-6284
          E-mail: nyjg@aol.com
                  danalgottlieb@aol.com


WEISS MEMORIAL: Heard Seeks to Stop Illegal Use of Biometric Data
-----------------------------------------------------------------
COREY HEARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. WEISS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION, Case No.
2019CH06763 (Ill. Cir., Cook Cty., June 4, 2019), seeks to redress
and curtail the Defendant's alleged unlawful collection, use,
storage, and disclosure of the Plaintiff's sensitive and
proprietary biometric data.

Weiss is a private, not-for-profit hospital located in Chicago,
Illinois, and operates within the City and in this Circuit.  Weiss
Memorial Hospital employed the Plaintiff as a respiratory
therapist.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ryan F. Stephan, Esq.
          James B. Zouras, Esq.
          Catherine T. Mitchell, Esq.
          Haley R. Jenkins, Esq.
          STEPHAN ZOURAS, LLP
          100 N. Riverside Plaza, Suite 2150
          Chicago, IL 60606
          Telephone: (312) 233-1550
          Facsimile: (312) 233-1560
          E-mail: rstephan@stephanzouras.com
                  jzouras@stephanzouras.com
                  cmitchell@stephanzouras.com
                  hjenkins@stephanzouras.com


WELLS FARGO: Chang Suit Alleges Breach of Fiduciary Duty
--------------------------------------------------------
Annie Chang, Tiger Chang Investments, LLC, Asians Investing in Real
Estate, LLC, Melanie Gonzales, Gary Gonzales, and G&M You-Nique
Property LLC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 3:19-cv-01973 (N.D.
Calif., April 12, 2019), is brought against the Defendant for
fraud, negligence and breach of fiduciary duty.

The Plaintiffs and other members of the class are victims of a
Ponzi scheme perpetrated with Defendant Wells Fargo's knowing
assistance and through its gross negligence, and in violation of
its fiduciary duties, as trustee, custodian, and/or escrow agent of
the Plaintiffs' and similarly situated investors' money, asserts
the complaint.

The scheme was the brainchild of Jerome Cohen and his son, Shaun
Cohen, who, through the companies they together controlled
(referred to herein collectively as "Equitybuild"), raised money
from investors ostensibly to invest in a real estate investment
program that the Cohens managed and that purchased, renovated, and
developed income-producing real estate properties in Chicago.

The Plaintiff alleges that Wells Fargo was willing to deviate from
its standard course of business to accommodate Equitybuild. The
Defendant knowingly assisted in Ponzi payments and the perpetration
of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty on the Plaintiffs and allowed
investors' money to be misused and misappropriated with knowledge
and through its own gross negligence.

The Plaintiffs are investors of Equitybuild to which the Defendant
served as custodian for the fiduciary funds deposited by its
investors.

The Defendant is a financial services company headquartered in San
Francisco, California. Wells Fargo is the third largest bank in the
United States as measured by assets. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

      Eve H. Cervantez, Esq.
      ALTSHULER BERZON LLP
      177 Post Street, Suite 300
      San Francisco, CA 94108
      Tel: (415) 421-7151
      Fax: (415) 362-8064
      E-mail: ecervantez@altshulerberzon.com



                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Rousel Elaine T.
Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L.
Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2019. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***