---

              C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, January 10, 2022, Vol. 24, No. 1

                            Headlines

A-1 OFFICE: Stalnaker Seeks to Recover Unpaid OT Wages Under FLSA
ACEVEDO PAINTING: Faces Wilder Wage-and-Hour Suit in S.D.N.Y.
AIR METHODS: Vaughn Dyer Files Rule 23 Class Certification Bid
ALFI INC: Rosen Law Firm Reminds of January 31 Deadline
ALGENIST LLC: Faces Nguyen Suit Over Deceptive Collagen Products

ALLIANCEONE RECEIVABLES: Faces Moore Suit Over Collection Letter
AMAZON.COM INC: Lopez Sues Over Doorbell's False Battery Life Label
AMAZON.COM SERVICES: Guerrero Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
AMAZON.COM: Court Defers Class Cert. Bid Ruling in Vance Suit
AMAZON.COM: Deadline to File Class Cert. Bid in Street Suit Vacated

AMERICAN SOCIETY: Court Narrows Claims in Baker Suit
AMN HEALTHCARE: Oliveira Seeks Minimum, OT Wages Under FLSA, OMWFSA
ANTHEM INC: Parties Directed to Create Integrated Joint Brief
ANTHEM INC: Scheduling Order Entered in Honeycutt Class Suit
ANTHONY ANNUCCI: Animashaun Loses Class Certification Bid

APPLE INC: $29.9 M Settlement in Frlekin Suit Gets Initial Nod
ARKENSTONE LTD: Contreras Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
ARRIVAL SA: Schmutter Sues Over Precipitous Drop in Share Price
ASSAGGIO HONOLULU: Vollmering Suit Seeks to Recover Minimum Wages
ASSESSOR OF FLORAL PARK: Lauria Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct.

ATLANTIC SPECIALTY: MSP Recovery Loses Class Status Bid
AVANT LLC: Sheppard Suit Claims Unlawful Debt Collection Practices
B&C PAINTING: Lopez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
BANK OZK: Court Certifies Class in Strathclyde Pension Fund Suit
BAR PRODUCTS.COM: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York

BEACH HOUSE: Must Response to Class Certification Bid by Jan. 14
BERKELEY LIGHTS: Kessler Topaz Reminds of February 7 Deadline
BISMILLAH 1: Santiago Suit Seeks Minimum Wages for Pharmacy Clerks
BOOST INSURANCE: Sends Unwanted Telemarketing Calls, Reimer Says
BSW GENERAL: Singh Suit Seeks Minimum Wages, OT Under FLSA, NYLL

CARDINAL HEALTH: Filing of Class Cert. Bid Due March 25
CASTLE STRATEGIC: Class Cert. Scheduling Order Entered in Akselrod
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS: Scheduling Order Entered in Pavelka Suit
CHOU TEAM: Filing of Class Certification Bid Due March 4
CITY DIMENSIONS: Lema Suit Alleges Unpaid Overtime for Laborers

CLOOPEN GROUP: Kessler Topaz Reminds of February 8 Deadline
CLOOPEN GROUP: Shareholders Foundation Reminds of Feb. 8 Deadline
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE: Rodriguez Sues Over Sunscreen's Benzene Content
COLLECTO INC: Davis Must File Class Cert. Bid by May 20
CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING: Henry Files FDCPA Suit in M.D. Florida

CORIZON HEALTH: Class Cert. Bid Filing Extended to April 8
COSTCO WHOLESALE: Canela Suit Underway in Calif. State Court
COSTCO WHOLESALE: De Benning Labor Suit Underway
COSTCO WHOLESALE: Files Reply to Edwards' Labor Suit
COSTCO WHOLESALE: Lane Suit Underway in Calif. State Court

COSTCO WHOLESALE: Schwab Suit Underway in Calif. State Court
COSTCO WHOLESALE: To Seek Dismissal of Dimas Suit
DENTALPLANS.COM: Bradley Seeks to Certify Class & Subclass
DESKTOP METAL: Faruqi & Faruqi Reminds of February 21 Deadline
DIGITAL MEDIA: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York

DIRECT ENERGY: Wins Summary Judgment v. Forte
DIRECTTOU LLC: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
DISTRESSED SOLUTIONS: Class Cert. Bid Filing Extended to Feb. 18
DMD MANAGEMENT: Spencer Seeks Extension to File Class Cert Reply
DOCUSIGN INC: Rosen Law Firm Reminds of February 22 Deadline

DRAPER JAMES: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
DREYERS GRAND: Scheduling, Discovery Order Entered in Zurliene
EMPLOYBRIDGE LLC: Underpays Non-Exempt Employees, Matimba Alleges
EOS PRODUCTS: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL: Kaiser Suit Removed to C.D. California

EXICURE INC: Rosen Law Firm Reminds of February 11 Deadline
EXPRESS LIEN: Filing of Class Certification Bid Due May 13
FOGO DE CHAO: Must File Class Cert. Response by Jan. 12
FOREST RIVER: Gross FLSA Suit Seeks to Certify Class of Employees
FOUNDATIONS HEALTH: Has Until Jan. 17 to file Class Cert Response

FULL SPECTRUM: Hershman Sues Over Unpaid OT for Sales Persons
GEORGIA: Harris Wins Class Certification Bid
GERBER PRODUCTS: Norman Balks at Non-GMO Claims on Food Products
GOOGLE LLC: Ct. Amends Case Schedule in Brown Class Action
GOOSEHEAD INSURANCE: Sealy Sues Over Unpaid OT for Service Agents

GRANT BAR & LOUNGE: Koyama Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
GRUNT STYLE: Contreras Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
GUIDEPOINT GLOBAL: Faces Jones Wage-and-Hour Suit in Sup. N.Y.
GUNITE PROS: Troxel Wins Bid for Conditional Certification
HARLEM 421: Underpays Food Supermarket Staff, Pastor Suit Claims

HENRY THAYER: Amended Case Management Order Entered in Lisowski
HOPEBRIDGE LLC: Skevington Sues Over Technicians' Unpaid Overtime
IKEA US: Third Scheduling Order Entered in Dukich Class Suit
ILLINOIS FARMERS: Two Classes Certified in Taqueria Suit
INAMORATA SWIM: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York

IOVATE HEALTH: Schoonover Suit Seeks to Certify Class Action
IQVIA INC: Filing of Class Certification Bid Due Jan. 18, 2023
JOHN HANCOCK: Leonard Seeks Initial Nod of Settlement
KE HOLDINGS: Bragar Eagel Reminds of February 28 Deadline
KI MOBILITY: Faces Sharpless Wage-and-Hour Suit in W.D. Wisconsin

KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS: Baldwin Files Suit in W.D. Pennsylvania
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS: Faces Johnson Suit Over Defective CPAP Devices
KORENS USA: Taunton Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages for Welders
LANDMARK REALTY: Rhonda Cheatem Files Class Certification Bid
LIBERTY POWER: Sapan Seeks to Certify Class Action

LIFETRADE: Plaintiffs Seek to Certify Class Action v. Ruppenthal
MARATHON DIGITAL: Rosen Law Firm Reminds of February 15 Deadline
MARIA'S TAMALES: Vilchis Sues Over Food Truck Drivers' Unpaid OT
MAVERICK: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
MAVRC PIZZA: Walker Sues Over Unreimbursed Automobile Expenses

MCDONALD'S USA: Ries Suit Wins Bid to Certify Class
MDL 2804: Costco Remains a Defendant in Opioid Litigation
MEMORIAL HERMANN: Sims Files TCPA Suit in S.D. Texas
MEMPHIS, TN: Wins Bid to Strike Class Allegations
MILK AND HONEY: Class of Restaurant Staff Conditionally Certified

MONDELEZ GLOBAL: Honey Wheat Crackers' Label "False," Wilim Claims
MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS: Class Cert Bid Filing Extended to March 10
MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OR: Court Stays Williams Class Action
N&C CLAIMS: Anessia Amoko Wins Collective Action Certification
NATIONAL FOOTBALL: Suero Sues Over Giants & Jets' Game Relocation

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE: Extension of Class Cert. Deadlines Sought
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE: Hoggard Loses Class Certification Bid
NATWEST MARKETS: Manipulates Treasury Futures Contracts, Suit Says
NEW YORK CITY, NY: Allen Suit Seeks to Certify Class
NISSAN NORTH: Ayala Seeks to Certify Class

NORTHRUP GRUMMAN: Class Cert. Scheduling Order Entered in York Suit
NUTRITION CORP: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
OMNI HOTELS: Scheduling Order Entered in Beaver Class Action
ONE SOURCE: Faces Wright Suit Over Inaccurate Consumer Reports
OSCAR MIKE: Fails to Properly Pay Diesel Mechanics, Tucker Claims

PELOTON INTERACTIVE: Rosen Law Firm Reminds of Jan. 18 Deadline
PHOENIX MANAGEMENT: Debt Collection Letter "Deceptive," Bhogte Says
PLAYTIKA HOLDING: Rosen Law Firm Reminds of January 24 Deadline
PLURIS WEDGEFIELD: Kohl Must File Reply to Opposition by Jan. 18
PROTECTIVE ENTERPRISES: Oneal Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages Under FLSA

PURE ROMANCE: Contreras Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
REATA PHARMACEUTICALS: Rosen Law Firm Reminds of Feb. 18 Deadline
SAMS WEST: Court Narrows Claims in Sanchez Class Suit
SELLO LLC: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
SPECIALIZED LOAN: Wins Summary Judgment Bid vs Mitchell

ST. LOUIS, MO: Cody Loses Class Certification Bid
T-MOBILE USA: Wellman Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri
TD AMERITRADE: Must Respond to Renewed Class Cert Bid by Feb. 14
TDB COMMUNICATIONS: Ramos Labor Suit Goes to E.D. California
THRIVING BRANDS: Antiperspirants Contain Benzene, Soldevilla Says

TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS: Debt Collection Letter "Deceptive," Sprei Says
UNILEVER UNITED: Continuance of Class Cert. Filing Sought
UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS: Filing of Class Cert. Bid Extended to March 10
VOYAGER DIGITAL: Cassidy Sues Over Cryptocurrency Misrepresentation
WALMART INC: Filing of Class Status Bid Due July 15

WALMART INC: Moreland Sues Over Product's "Non-Drowsy" Claims
WAN HAO: Tung Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages for Restaurant Staff
WISCONSIN: Bid to Certify Rule 23 Class Due July 8
XPO LAST: Joint Bid to Amend Class Cert Briefing Schedule Filed
ZOOSK INC: Ct. Amends Class Cert. Briefing Dates in Flores-Mendez

[*] Squire Patton Attorneys Provide 2021 CCPA Litigation Review

                            *********

A-1 OFFICE: Stalnaker Seeks to Recover Unpaid OT Wages Under FLSA
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DAVID LEE STALNAKER Individually and On Behalf of All Others
Similarly Situated v. A-1 OFFICE FURNITURE, LLC and SHAWN MATLACK,
Case No. 7:22-cv-00001 (W.D. Tex., Jan. 3, 2022) seeks to recover
unpaid overtime wage, liquidated damages, attorney's fees and costs
under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.

A-1 sells, delivers, assembles and installs new office furniture in
and around the Permian Basin.

Stalnaker is an individual who resides in Midland County and who
was employed by A-1 and Matlack during the last three years.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         Melissa Moore, Esq.
         Curt Hesse, Esq.
         MOORE & ASSOCIATES
         Lyric Center
         440 Louisiana Street, Suite 1110
         Houston, TX 77002-1063
         Telephone: (713) 222-6775
         Facsimile: (713) 222-6739
         E-mail: melissa@mooreandassociates.net
                 curt@mooreandassociates.net

ACEVEDO PAINTING: Faces Wilder Wage-and-Hour Suit in S.D.N.Y.
-------------------------------------------------------------
ANTONIO JUAREZ WILDER, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ACEVEDO PAINTING, CORP. and SIXTO
O. ACEVEDO, Defendants, Case No. 7:21-cv-11091 (S.D.N.Y., December
28, 2021) is a class action against the Defendants for violations
of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law
including failure to pay overtime wages for all hours worked,
failure to provide wage notices, and failure to provide accurate
wage statements.

The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendants as a painter from June
2017 until September 2019.

Acevedo Painting, Corp., is a painting services provider, with a
principal executive office located at 42 Sasso Lane, Wingdale, New
York. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                                   
                                  
         
         Roman Avshalumov, Esq.
         HELEN F. DALTON & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
         80-02 Kew Gardens Road, Suite 601
         Kew Gardens, NY 11415
         Telephone: (718) 263-9591
         Facsimile: (718) 263-9598

AIR METHODS: Vaughn Dyer Files Rule 23 Class Certification Bid
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as VAUGHN DYER, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated, v. AIR METHODS
CORPORATION, and ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No.
9:20-cv-02309-DCN (D.S.C.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter
an order certifying the following class pursuant to Rule 23(b)(2)
and Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:

   "All persons billed by Defendants, or who paid a bill from
   Defendants, for air medical transport that Defendants carried
   out from a location in South Carolina;"

   Excluded from both Classes are Defendants, any entity in
   which the Defendants has a controlling interest or which have
   a controlling interest of Defendant, and Defendants' legal
   representatives, assigns and successors. Also excluded are
   the judge to whom this case is assigned and any member of the
   judge’s immediate family.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion to certify class dated Jan. 3,
2021 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/31CVzoN
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mario A. Pacella, Esq.
          J. Preston Strom, Jr., Esq.
          STROM LAW FIRM, LLC
          6923 N. Trenholm Rd. Suite 200
          Columbia, SC 29206
          Telephone: (803) 252-4800
          Facsimile: (803) 252-4801
          E-mail: petestrom@stromlaw.com
                  mpacella@stromlaw.com

               - and -

          Terry E. Richardson, Jr., Esq.
          Daniel S. Haltiwanger, Esq.
          Chris Moore, Esq.
          RICHARDSON, THOMAS, HALTIWANGER,
          MOORE & LEWIS
          1730 Jackson Street
          Barnwell, SC 29812
          Telephone: (803) 541-7860
          E-mail: terry@richardsonthomas.com
                  dan@richardsonthomas.com
                  Chris@richardsonthomas.com

               - and -

          Richard Joseph Burke, Esq.
          QUANTUM LEGAL LLC – HIGHLAND PARK
          513 Central Avenue, Suite 300
          Highland Park, IL 60035
          Telephone: (847) 433-4500
          E-mail: richard@qulegal.com

               - and -

          Edward L. White, Esq.
          EDWARD L. WHITE, PC
          829 East 33rd Street
          Edmond OK 73013
          Telephone: (405) 810-8188
          E-mail: ed@edwhitelaw.com

ALFI INC: Rosen Law Firm Reminds of January 31 Deadline
-------------------------------------------------------
WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds
purchasers of the securities of Alfi, Inc. (NASDAQ:ALF): (1)
pursuant and/or traceable to the Company's initial public offering
conducted on or about May 4, 2021 (the "IPO" or "Offering") and/or
(2) between May 4, 2021 and November 15, 2021, inclusive (the
"Class Period"), of the important January 31, 2022 lead plaintiff
deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Alfi securities you may be entitled to
compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs
through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Alfi class action, go to
http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2201.htmlor call Phillip
Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or
cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action. A class
action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead
plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than January 31, 2022.
A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of
other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel
with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms
issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources or any
meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually
litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel.
The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe,
concentrating its practice in securities class actions and
shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the
largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese
Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class
Action Services for number of securities class action settlements
in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013
and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In
2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In
2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a
Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been
recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, the Offering
documents issued in connection with the Company's IPO were
negligently prepared and, as a result, contained untrue statements
of material fact or omitted to state other facts necessary to make
the statements made not misleading and were not prepared in
accordance with the rules and regulations governing their
preparation. Further, according to the lawsuit, throughout the
Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading
statements regarding Alfi's business, operations, and compliance
policies. Specifically, the Offering Documents and defendants made
false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
(1) Alfi maintained deficient disclosure controls and procedures
and internal control over financial reporting; (2) as a result,
Alfi and its employees could and did engage in corporate
transactions and other matters without sufficient and appropriate
consultation with or approval by Alfi's Board of Directors; (3) all
of the foregoing increased the risk of internal and regulatory
investigations into Alfi and its employees; (4) all of the
foregoing, once revealed, was likely to have a material negative
impact on Alfi's reputation, financial condition, and ability to
timely file periodic reports with the SEC; and (5) as a result,
defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading
at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market,
the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Alfi class action, go to
http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2201.htmlor call Phillip
Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or
cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are
not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select
counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member
and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any
potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead
plaintiff.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar
outcome.

Contact Information:

      Laurence Rosen, Esq.
      Phillip Kim, Esq.
      The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
      275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
      New York, NY 10016
      Tel: (212) 686-1060
      Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
      Fax: (212) 202-3827
      lrosen@rosenlegal.com
      pkim@rosenlegal.com
      cases@rosenlegal.com
      www.rosenlegal.com [GN]

ALGENIST LLC: Faces Nguyen Suit Over Deceptive Collagen Products
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CATHERINE NGUYEN, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, v. ALGENIST LLC, Case No. 1:22-cv-00013
(S.D.N.Y., Jan. 3, 2022 ) is a putative class action lawsuit on
behalf of purchasers of Algenist Collagen Products alleging that
the Defendant's representations regarding the skin-firming and
anti-aging benefits of vegan collagen in the Products are false and
misleading.

The Defendant markets and sells the Products as proprietary "vegan
collagen" skincare that provide "advanced anti-aging" benefits and
"restore[s] bounce and resilience with active vegan collagen."
However, collagen as a topical product is worthless because it
cannot penetrate the top layer of skin to provide such benefits.
Further, collagen is a product derived from animals -- it is
impossible for plants to produce collagen in any manner, says the
suit.

Allegedly, the collagen cosmetic products are beauty products that
contain collagen, and that purportedly stimulate collagen synthesis
and growth, leading to anti-aging benefits. The global collagen
market was valued at $4.27 billion in 2018 and is expected to grow
to $6.63 billion by 2025. 2 As a result, collagen has become a huge
marketing tool to draw consumers into "anti-aging" or
"healthy-aging" or products.

Collagen is the main structural protein in animal and human
connective tissues, most notably human skin. Collagen therefore
serves as one of the main building blocks for bones, skin, hair,
muscles, tendons, and ligaments.

The human body naturally makes collagen, but this production
decreases with age. As humans enter their 20s and 30s, collagen
production slows, triggering wrinkles and saggy skin.

Plaintiff Nguyen purchased Algenist Genius Collagen Calming Relief
in April of 2021 at a TJ Maxx in New York, New York. Prior to her
purchases of Algenist Genius Collagen Calming Relief, Plaintiff
Nguyen reviewed the Product's labeling and packaging and saw that
the Algenist Genius Collagen Calming Relief contained "vegan
collagen" that would provide "advanced anti-aging" benefits.

Collagen Products in the Beauty Industry Collagen is the most
abundant protein the human body, making up an estimated 80% of the
human skin. It is often referred to the as the "body's
scaffolding," as it is the most important structural protein in
skin. Plentiful levels of collagen in the human skin gives the skin
a firm, plump, and youthful look.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Alec M. Leslie, Esq.
          BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
          888 Seventh Avenue
          New York, NY 10019
          Telephone: (646) 837-7150
          Facsimile: (212) 989-9163
          E-mail: aleslie@bursor.com

              - and -

          L. Timothy Fisher, Esq.
          Brittany S. Scott, Esq.
          BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
          1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
          Walnut Creek, CA 94596
          Telephone: (925) 300-4455
          Facsimile: (925) 407-2700
          E-mail: bscott@bursor.com

ALLIANCEONE RECEIVABLES: Faces Moore Suit Over Collection Letter
----------------------------------------------------------------
Shawn Moore, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v.
AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc., Case No. CACE-22-000193
(Fla. Cir., Broward Cty., Jan. 4, 2022) is a class action under the
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, for the benefit of Florida
consumers whose private, consumer debt-related information
AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc. disclosed to an
unauthorized third party, in connection with the collection of the
Florida consumers' debts.

RevSpring, on behalf of Defendant, printed and mailed a debt
collection letter ("Letter") to Plaintiff.

According to the complaint, the letter, which is addressed to
Plaintiff, references the Debt, the account number for the Debt,
the creditor to whom the Debt is allegedly owed, the creditor's
reference number for the Debt, and the balance of the Debt.

By communicating regarding the Debt, including by disclosing, among
other things, the existence of the Debt, the amount owed, and the
alleged creditor, with a third-party mail vendor, Defendant
allegedly violated 15 U.S.C. section 16, the lawsuit says.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Aaron D. Radbil, Esq.
          Michael L. Greenwald, Esq.
          James L. Davidson, Esq.
          GREENWALD DAVIDSON RAD BIL PLLC
          7601 N. Federal Hwy., Suite A-230
          Boca Raton, FL 33487
          Telephone: (561) 826-5477
          E-mail: aradbil@gdrlawfirm.com
                  mgreenwald@gdrlawfirm.com
                  jdavidson@gdrlawfirm.com

AMAZON.COM INC: Lopez Sues Over Doorbell's False Battery Life Label
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MARIA LOPEZ and ALEXIS BROWN, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. AMAZON.COM, INC.,
Defendant, Case No. 2:21-cv-02317-CSB-EIL (C.D. Ill., December 25,
2021) is a class action against the Defendant for negligent
misrepresentation, fraud, unjust enrichment, breaches of express
warranty, implied warranty of merchantability/fitness for a
particular purpose, and the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act, and
violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business
Practices Act and State Consumer Fraud Acts.

According to the complaint, the Defendant is engaged in false,
deceptive, and misleading advertising, labeling, and marketing of
its video doorbell under the Ring brand. The Defendant represented
the product's battery life as between 6 and 12 months. However,
most customers will not get two months of normal usage from a full
battery charge, by experiencing accelerated battery depletion
(ABD). ABD occurs even when users have modified their settings to
restrict motion triggers to no more than five events per day. As a
result of the Defendant's misrepresentations, the Plaintiffs and
Class members have sustained damages. Had they known the truth,
they would not have bought the product or would have paid less for
it, says the suit.

Amazon.com, Inc. is an electronic commerce company based in
Seattle, Washington. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:          
         
         Spencer Sheehan, Esq.
         SHEEHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
         60 Cuttermill Rd., Ste. 409
         Great Neck, NY 11021
         Telephone: (516) 268-7080
         E-mail: spencer@spencersheehan.com

AMAZON.COM SERVICES: Guerrero Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
-----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Amazon.com Services,
LLC, et al. The case is styled as Jennifer Guerrero, on behalf of
herself and all others similarly situated v. Amazon.com Services,
LLC, Amazon.com, Inc., Does 1-50, Inclusive, Golden State, LLC (NKA
Amazon.com Services, LLC), Case No. CGC21597377 (Cal. Super. Ct.,
San Francisco Cty., Dec. 30, 2021).

The case type is stated as "Business Tort."

Amazon Services LLC -- https://www.amazon.com/ -- offers many of
the Web service platforms that are Amazon offers.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Daniel Louis Feder, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL FEDER
          235 Montgomery St., Ste. 1019
          San Francisco, CA 94104-3003
          Phone: 415-391-9476
          Fax: 415-391-9476
          Email: daniel@dfederlaw.com

               - and -

          Eric Lechtzin, Esq.
          EDELSON LECHTZIN LLP
          3 Terry Drive, Suite 205
          Newtown, PA 18940
          Phone: 844-696-7492



AMAZON.COM: Court Defers Class Cert. Bid Ruling in Vance Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as STEVEN VANCE, et al., v.
AMAZON.COM, INC., Case No. 2:20-cv-01084-JLR (W.D. Wash.), the Hon.
Judge James L. Robart entered an order as follows:

   1. The parties shall complete briefing on Plaintiffs' motion
      for class certification in accordance with the schedule
      set forth in their stipulation modifying the class
      certification scheduling order.

   2. The parties shall file, by no later than Monday, January
      10, 2022, a stipulation and proposed order setting a
      revised briefing schedule for Amazon's motion for summary
      judgment. The stipulation shall identify the additional
      discovery that is necessary for Plaintiffs to respond to
      Amazon's motion.

   3. If the parties are unable to agree on a revised briefing
      schedule, Plaintiffs shall file, by no later than Monday,
      January 10, 2022, a motion for additional discovery
      pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d).
      Amazon's response to this motion shall be due no later
      than Tuesday, January 18, 2022, and Plaintiffs' reply
      shall be due no later than Friday, January 21, 2022.

   4. The Clerk is directed to renote Amazon's motion for
      summary judgment for January 21, 2022. The court will
      further reset the noting date when it issues its order on
      either the parties' stipulation or Plaintiffs' motion.

   5. The court defers ruling on Plaintiffs' motion for class
      certification until after it has decided Amazon's motion
      for summary judgment. The Clerk is directed to
      administratively terminate the motion for class
      certification pending the court's order on Amazon's motion
      for summary judgment.

A copy of the Court's order dated Jan. 3, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3JRRkXt at no extra charge.[CC]

AMAZON.COM: Deadline to File Class Cert. Bid in Street Suit Vacated
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MARY and MATTHEW STREET,
v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC., a Delaware Limited Liability Company;
AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company,
Case No. 2:21-cv-00912-BJR (W.D. Wash.), the Parties ask the Court
to enter an order on joint stipulation and motion regarding class
certification briefing deadline as follows:

   (1) A new scheduling order will be issued after the Court
       rules on Defendants' motion to dismiss, if the motion is
       not granted;

   (2) The deadline for Plaintiffs to file a motion for class
       certification is vacated and stayed until further order
       by the Court; and

   (3) The Parties will include proposed deadlines for the
       filing of the motion for class certification when they
       file their initial joint status report pursuant to Rule
       26.

Amazon.com is an American multinational technology company that
focuses on e-commerce.

A copy of the Parties' motion dated Jan. 4, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3zFuwpy at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jason T. Dennett, Esq.
          Rebecca L. Solomon, Esq.
          TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS PLLC
          1200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1700
          Seattle, WA 98101
          Telephone: 206.682.5600
          Facsimile: 206.682.2992
          E-mail: jdennett@tousley.com
                  rsolomon@tousley.com

               - and -

          Brad R. Sohn, Esq.
          THE BRAD SOHN LAW FIRM, PLLC
          1600 Ponce De Leon Blvd., Suite 1205
          Coral Gables, FL 33134
          Telephone: (786) 708-9750
          Facsimile: (305) 397-0650
          E-mail: brad@bradsohnlaw.com

               - and -

          Graham B. Lippsmith, Esq.
          MaryBeth Lippsmith, Esq.
          Jaclyn L. Anderson, Esq.
          LIPPSMITH LLP
          555 South Flower Street, Suite 4400
          Lost Angeles, CA 90071
          Telephone: 213.344.1820
          E-mail: g@lippsmith.com
          mb@lippsmith.com
          jla@lippsmith.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Brian D. Buckley, Esq.
          Annalise Bender-Brown, Esq.
          David W. Feder, Esq.
          FENWICK & WEST LLP
          1191 Second Avenue, 10th Floor
          Seattle, WA 98101
          Telephone: (206) 389-4510
          Facsimile: (206) 389-4511
          E-mail: bbuckley@fenwick.com
                  abenderbrown@fenwick.com
                  dfeder@fenwick.com

AMERICAN SOCIETY: Court Narrows Claims in Baker Suit
----------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Alexander C. Baker, et
al., v. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, et
al., Case No. CV-21-00022-TUC-RM (D. Ariz.), the Hon. Judge
Rosemary Marquez entered an order that the remaining portions of
the Defendants' motions to dismiss are partially granted, partially
denied, and partially taken under advisement, as follows:

   1. Defendants' Motions are denied to the extent they request
      dismissal of this action for lack of subject-matter
      jurisdiction;

   2. Defendants' requests for transfer are granted;

   3. Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) arguments concerning Counts One,
      Five, and Six of the FAC, as well as BMI's arguments
      concerning standing and mandatory arbitration remain pending

      for resolution by the Southern District of New York.

The Court further ordered that Plaintiffs' motion for class
certification is denied without prejudice, with leave to re-file
after this case has been transferred to the Southern District of
New York.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 28, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3mYyDaX at no extra charge.[CC]


AMN HEALTHCARE: Oliveira Seeks Minimum, OT Wages Under FLSA, OMWFSA
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Sharon Oliveira, individually and on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated v. AMN Healthcare, Inc., a Nevada
corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Case No.
3:22-cv-00003-LL-WVG (S.D. Cal., Jan. 3, 2022 ) arises under the
Fair Labor Standards Act and the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards
Act for AMN's failure to pay Plaintiff and other similarly-situated
employees all earned minimum and overtime wages.

The Plaintiff, the Collective Members, and the Class Members are
current and former employees of AMN. The Plaintiff brings this
action on behalf of herself and all similarly-situated current and
former Interpreters ("Covered Positions") of AMN.

AMN provides staffing and recruitment services for healthcare
providers nationwide. One of the services that AMN provides is
supplying healthcare providers with qualified language interpreters
such as Plaintiff, the Collective Members and the Class
Members.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Brian S. Kabateck, Esq.
          Shant Karnikian, Esq.
          Jerusalem F. Beligan, Esq.
          KABATECK LLP
          633 W. Fifth Street, Suite 3200
          Los Angeles, CA 90071
          Telephone: (213) 217-5000
          Facsimile: (213) 217-5010
          E-mail: bsk@kbklawyers.com
                  sk@kbklawyers.com
                  jfb@kbklawyers.com

               - and -

          James L. Simon, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICES OF SIMON & SIMON
          5000 Rockside Road
          Liberty Plaza -- Suite 520
          Independence, OH 44131
          Telephone: (216) 525-8890
          E-mail: james@bswages.com

ANTHEM INC: Parties Directed to Create Integrated Joint Brief
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as BRENDA HONEYCUTT v.
ANTHEM, INC., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-06124-FMO-KS (C.D. Cal.),
the Court entered an order regarding motions for class
certification:

    1. Joint Brief:

       The parties shall work cooperatively to create a single,
       fully integrated joint brief covering each party's
       position, in which each issue (or sub-issue) raised by a
       party is immediately followed by the opposing
       party's/parties' response.

    2. Meet and Confer:

       In order for a motion for class certification to be filed
       in a timely manner, the meet and confer must take place
       no later than 35 days before the deadline for class
       certification motions set forth in the Court's Case
       Management and Scheduling Order.

    3. Supplemental Memorandum:

       After the joint brief is filed, each party may file a
       supplemental memorandum of points and authorities no later
       than 14 days prior to the hearing date.

Anthem, Inc., is a provider of health insurance in the United
States. It is the largest for-profit managed health care company in
the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association.

A copy of the Court's order dated Jan. 4, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3HCTmsO at no extra charge.[CC]

ANTHEM INC: Scheduling Order Entered in Honeycutt Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as BRENDA HONEYCUTT, v.
ANTHEM, INC., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-06124-FMO-KS (C.D. Cal.),
the Hon. Judge Fernando M. Olguin entered a scheduling order as
follows:

   1. Any stipulation or motion to amend as to any claims,
      defenses and/or parties shall be lodged/filed no later
      than April 5, 2022, failing which it shall be deemed that
      party's waiver of any such amendments in this action.

   2. All fact discovery shall be completed no later than July
      5, 2022. The court does not bifurcate discovery.

   3. All expert discovery shall be completed by September 20,
      2022. The parties must serve their Initial Expert Witness
      Disclosures no later than July 19, 2022. Rebuttal Expert
      Witness Disclosures shall be served no later than August
      16, 2022. The parties should commence expert discovery
      shortly after the initial designation of experts, because
      Local Rules 7-3 and 37-1 require ample time to meet and
      confer as well as brief the matters, and because the final
      pretrial conference and trial dates will not be continued
      merely because expert discovery is still underway.

   4. The parties shall complete their settlement conference
      before a private mediator no later than July 5, 2022.
      Plaintiff's counsel shall contact the mediator with enough
      time so that the settlement conference date is early
      enough to comply with the settlement completion deadline
      imposed by this court.

   5. Any motion for class certification shall be filed no later
      than October 18, 2022, and noticed for hearing regularly
      under the Local Rules. Any untimely or non-conforming
      motion will be denied. The motion for class certification
      shall comply with the requirements set forth in the
      Court's Order Re: Motions for Class Certification issued
      contemporaneously with the filing of this Order.

   6. Any motion for summary judgment or other potentially
      dispositive motion (other than a motion under Rule 12(b)
      (6)) shall be filed no later than December 20, 2022, and
      noticed for hearing regularly under the Local Rules. Any
      untimely or non-conforming motion will be denied.

   7. The court will set dates and deadlines for trial, a
      pretrial conference, and the parties' pretrial filings
      after the resolution of any dispositive motions and the
      motion for class certification.

A copy of the Court's order dated Jan. 4, 2022 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3naz7e7 at no extra charge.[CC]


ANTHONY ANNUCCI: Animashaun Loses Class Certification Bid
---------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as DAMILOLA ANIMASHAUN, v.
ANTHONY ANNUCCI, et al., Case No. 9:19-cv-00820-LEK-DJS (N.D.N.Y.),
the Hon. Judge Lawrence E. Kahn entered an order denying the
Plaintiff's motion for class certification.

The Court said, "The Plaintiff has not identified the number of
potential inmates in the proposed class, let alone set forth any
proof that the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is
impracticable. In addition, Plaintiff has not established that his
case presents questions of law or fact that are common to the rest
of the proposed class, and the Court has trouble independently
finding any commonality between inmates who have been confined in
the SHU for the past 305 days or more and Plaintiff, who, as far as
the Court knows, is not currently confined in the SHU, and is
litigating whether or not he can be placed there in the future in
light of his specific disciplinary and mental health history.
Furthermore, in light of the fact-specific nature of the alleged
constitutional violation in this case, the Plaintiff has failed to
establish either that his claim, or the defenses raised by
Defendants, are representative of the potential class, or that he
will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the proposed
class. Accordingly, Plaintiff's request for class certification is
denied. Until such time as a motion seeking certification of the
proposed class is properly filed, and demonstrates that the
requirements of Rule 23 have been satisfied, this action shall be
considered only as an action brought by Plaintiff in his individual
capacity. Accordingly, the Plaintiff's motion is also denied
insofar as Plaintiff seeks relief on behalf of anyone other than
himself."

The Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint alleges constitutional
violations arising out of his continuous restrictive confinement
between August, 2016 and September, 2019, and scheduled restrictive
confinement thereafter. Pursuant to the February 2021 Order, the
only claim that remains in this action is an Eighth Amendment claim
for injunctive relief stemming from restrictive confinement that
Plaintiff was scheduled to serve after September 12, 2019, based on
past disciplinary determinations.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 28, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3EXE0Ny at no extra charge.[CC]



APPLE INC: $29.9 M Settlement in Frlekin Suit Gets Initial Nod
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as AMANDA FRLEKIN, AARON
GREGOROFF, SETH DOWNLING, DEBRA SPEICHER, AND TAYLOR KALIN, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. APPLE
INC., Case No. 3:13-cv-03451-WHA (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge
William Alsup entered an order as follows:

-- The proposed settlement ranks as adequate at this stage,
   preliminary approval is granted subject to final approval.
   The class definition is certified to include the additional
   799 Apple employees.

-- Class counsel will send the approved class notice via email
   (for class members 11 whose email addresses are known) or via
   first-class mail (for the remainder) to the class by January
   11, 2022. Both Apple and class counsel shall also post such
   notice to their websites by this date.

-- Class members' objections to the proposed settlement shall be
   due April 26, 2022. The parties' replies to the objections
   shall be due May 10, 2022.

-- The parties shall move for final approval, costs, and
   attorney's fees by May 30, 2022.

-- The motion for attorney's fees should detail the lodestar.

-- The parties' declarations attesting to the provision of class
   service is due June 15,

-- Class members' objections to final approval and attorneys'
   fees and costs motions shall be due July 5, 2022.

In this class action alleging violations of California wage and
hour law, the plaintiffs seek preliminary approval of a class and
collective action settlement worth $29.9 million to benefit a total
of 14,683 employees and former employees.

The suit concerns the failure to compensate for time spent in bag
and technology security checks over six years.

Apple, Inc. employed settlement class members in its 52 retail
stores in California. Those employees were subject to a  written
"Employee Package and Bag Searches" policy, which imposed mandatory
searches of employees’ bags, purses, backpacks, or briefcases
whenever they left the store.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 28, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3pWUxx8 at no extra charge.[CC]

ARKENSTONE LTD: Contreras Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
---------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against The Arkenstone, Ltd.
The case is styled as Yensy Contreras, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated v. The Arkenstone, Ltd., Case No.
1:21-cv-11201 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

The Arkenstone, Ltd. doing business as iRocks --
https://www.irocks.com/ -- offers fine minerals and crystals for
sale on.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jarrett Scott Charo, Esq.
          MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
          200 Vesey Street, Ste. 24th Floor
          New York, NY 10281
          Phone: (212) 595-6200
          Email: jcharo@mizrahikroub.com



ARRIVAL SA: Schmutter Sues Over Precipitous Drop in Share Price
---------------------------------------------------------------
BRUCE SCHMUTTER and DEAN SAMET, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. ARRIVAL SA, DENIS
SVERDLOV, TIM HOLBROW, MICHAEL ABLESON, and AVINASH RUGOOBUR,
Defendants, Case No. 1:21-cv-11016 (S.D.N.Y., December 22, 2021) is
a federal securities class action brought by the Plaintiffs, on
behalf of a class consisting of all persons other than Defendants
who purchased or otherwise acquired common shares of Arrival stock
between November 18, 2020 and November 19, 2021, both dates
inclusive, seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants'
violation of the federal securities laws under Sections 10(b) and
20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the Company
and certain of its top officials.

Arrival (formerly Arrival Luxembourg S.a r.l.) was founded in 2015
as a private company headquartered in London, UK. Arrival is a
manufacturer and distributor of commercial electric vehicles,
including vans, cars, and buses. Arrival develops vertically
integrated technologies and products that create a new approach to
the assembly of EVs. According to Arrival, its proprietary in-house
developed components, materials, software and robotic technologies,
combined with low capital expenditure and rapidly scalable
microfactories, enable Arrival to produce EVs that are
competitively priced to traditional fossil fuel vehicles and with a
substantially lower total cost of ownership for customers.

Throughout the Class Period, the Defendants allegedly made
materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's
business, operations, and compliance policies. Specifically, the
Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to
disclose that: (i) the Company would record a substantially greater
net loss and adjusted EBITDA loss in the third quarter of 2021
compared to the third quarter of 2020; (ii) the Company would
experience far greater capital and operational expense to operate
and deploy its microfactories and manufacture EV vehicles than it
had disclosed; (iii) the Company would not capitalize on or achieve
profitability or provide meaningful revenue in the time periods
disclosed; (iv) the Company would not achieve its disclosed
production and sales volumes; (v) the Company would not meet the
disclosed production rollout deadlines. Accordingly, the Company
materially overstated its financial and operational position and/or
prospects, and (vi) as a result, the Company's public statements
were materially false and misleading at all relevant times, says
the suit.

On this news, Arrival shares dropped $0.82, or approximately 8%, to
close at $9.91 on November 18, 2021 on unusually high trading
volume.

As a result of the Defendants' alleged wrongful acts and omissions,
and the precipitous decline in the market value of the Company's
securities, Plaintiff and other Class members have suffered
significant losses and damages.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Andrea Farah, Esq.
          Margaret MacLean, Esq.
          David C. Harrison, Esq.
          Richard Frank, Esq.   
          LOWEY DANNENBERG, P.C.
          44 South Broadway, Suite 1100
          White Plains, NY 10601
          Telephone: (914) 997-0500
          E-mail: afarah@lowey.com
                  mmaclean@lowey.com
                  dharrison@lowey.com
                  rfrank@lowey.com

ASSAGGIO HONOLULU: Vollmering Suit Seeks to Recover Minimum Wages
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SCARLETT VOLLMERING and TRISTAN VOLLMERING, Individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. ASSAGGIO HONOLULU, LLC
and SANG SANANIKONE, Case No. 2:22-cv-00002 (S.D. Tex., Jan. 4,
2022) seeks all available relief, including compensation,
liquidated damages, civil penalties, attorneys' fees, and costs,
pursuant to the the Labor Standards Act of 1938.

This lawsuit includes a collective action to recover the minimum
wage, wrongfully withheld tips, overtime, liquidated damages, and
all other applicable penalties brought pursuant to the FLSA, says
the suit.

The Plaintiffs and the Putative Class Members are those current and
former Tip-Credit Employees who worked for the Defendants at any
time since January 4, 2019 through the final disposition of this
matter and were not paid the minimum wage.

The Defendants denied Plaintiffs and the Putative Class Members
minimum wage and instead either paid them using a tip-credit wage
or did not pay them any hourly wage at all, the lawsuit adds.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          William Clifton Alexander, Esq.
          ANDERSON ALEXANDER PLLC
          819 N Upper Broadway
          Corpus Christi, TX 78401
          Telephone: (361) 452-1279
          E-mail: clif@a2xlaw.com

ASSESSOR OF FLORAL PARK: Lauria Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct.
-----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against The Assessor of the
Village of Floral Park, et al. The case is styled as Elizabeth
Lauria, All other similarly situated Petitioners on the annexed
SCHEDULE A, Petitioner v. The Assessor of the Village of Floral
Park, The Board of Assessment Review of the Village of Floral Park,
Respondents, Case No. 616304/2021 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Nassau Cty., Dec.
30, 2021).

The case type is stated as "SP-CPLR Article 78 (Body or Officer)."

Floral Park -- https://fpvillage.org/ -- is an incorporated village
in Nassau County, New York, United States, on Long Island.[BN]

The Petitioner is represented by:

          MAIDENBAUM & STERNBERG, LLP
          132 Spruce St
          Cedarhurst, NY 11516-1915



ATLANTIC SPECIALTY: MSP Recovery Loses Class Status Bid
-------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS,
SERIES LLC, v. ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No.
6:20-cv-00553-RBD-EJK (M.D. Fla.), the Hon. Judge Roy Dalton
entered an order denying the Plaintiff's motion for class
certification of:

   "All Medicare Advantage Plans and downstream actors (or their
   assignees) that have borne the cost of a conditional payment
   in providing benefits under Medicare Part C, in the United
   States of America and its territories, who made payments for
   a Medicare Enrollee's medical expenses where Defendant:

   (1) is the primary payer by virtue of having settled a claim
       with a Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollee;

   (2) settled a dispute to pay for medical expenses with a
       Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollee; and

   (3) failed to reimburse Medicare Advantage Plans and
       downstream actors (or their assignees) for their
       conditional payments upon settling with a Medicare
       Enrollee.

This class definition excludes (a) Defendant, its officers,
directors, management, employees, subsidiaries, and affiliates; and
(b) any judges or justices involved in this action and any members
of their immediate families.

The Defendant insures third parties responsible for injuries to
beneficiaries of Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAO); Defendant
is therefore a primary payer under the Medicare Secondary Payer
Act.

As such, when the MAOs and Defendant settle claims by
beneficiaries, the Defendant is required to pay the beneficiaries'
medical expenses before they pay anything or to reimburse them if
they pay first.

The Plaintiff is an entity that is assigned claims after the MAOs
settle with Defendant. The Defendant allegedly did not timely
reimburse the MAOs (and thereby Plaintiff) for settlements. So
Plaintiff brought this putative class action under the Act. The
Plaintiff now moves for class certification under Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 23(b)(3).

Atlantic provides specialty insurance services.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 29, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3qOFzIV at no extra charge.[CC]

AVANT LLC: Sheppard Suit Claims Unlawful Debt Collection Practices
------------------------------------------------------------------
CHAD SHEPPARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. AVANT, LLC d/b/a AVANT CREDIT CORP,
Defendant, Case No. 0:21-cv-62566 (S.D. Fla., December 27, 2021) is
a class action against the Defendant for violation of the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act.

The case arises from the Defendant's alleged collection of debt
from the Plaintiff without a valid consumer collection agency
license in Florida. The Defendant also transmitted the Plaintiff's
personal information to a third-party in connection with the
collection of the alleged debt.

Avant, LLC, doing business as Avant Credit Corp, is a financial
technology company, with its principal place of business located in
Chicago, Illinois. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:          
         
         Jibrael S. Hindi, Esq.
         Thomas J. Patti, Esq.
         THE LAW OFFICES OF JIBRAEL S. HINDI
         110 SE 6th Street, Suite 1744
         Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
         Telephone: (954) 907-1136
         Facsimile: (855) 529-9540
         E-mail: jibrael@jibraellaw.com
                 tom@jibraellaw.com

B&C PAINTING: Lopez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
-------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against B&C Painting
Solutions, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Jorge Lopez Lopez, an
individual, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v.
B&C Painting Solutions, Inc., a California corporation, Case No.
STK-CV-UOE-2021-0012028 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Joaquin Cty., Dec.
30, 2020).

The case type is stated as "Unlimited Civil Other Employment."

B & C Painting Solutions -- http://bcpaintingsolutions.com/--
provides Northern California with quality production powder
coating, liquid painting, and screen printing services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          David Yeremian, Esq.
          DAVID YEREMIAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
          535 N Brand Blvd., Suite 705
          Glendale, CA 91203
          Phone: 818-230-8380


BANK OZK: Court Certifies Class in Strathclyde Pension Fund Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as STRATHCLYDE PENSION FUND,
Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated. v.
BANK OZK, and GEORGE GLEASON, Case No. 4:18-cv-00793-DPM (E.D.
Ark.), the Hon. Judge D.P. Marshall Jr. entered an order:

   1. certifying the following class under FED. R. CIV. P. 23(b)
      (3):

      All persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the common
      stock of Bank OZK between 19 February 2016 and 18 October
      2018, inclusive;"

      Excluded from the class are: (I) defendant Bank OZK, its
      parents, subsidiaries, and any other entity owned or
      controlled by Bank OZK; (ii) defendant George Gleason;
      (iii) all other executive officers and directors of Bank
      OZK, or any of its parents, subsidiaries, or other
      entities owned or controlled by Bank OZK; (iv) all
      immediate family members of the foregoing individuals,
      including grandparents, parents, spouses, siblings,
      children, grandchildren, and step relations of similar
      degree; and (v) all predecessors and successors in
      interest or assigns of any of the foregoing;"

   2. appointing lead plaintiff Strathclyde Pension Fund as
      class representative;

   3. appoinitng Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd LLP as class
      counsel and Carney, Bates & Pullman, PLLC as liaison
      counsel; and

   4. granting Strathclyde's unopposed motion for class
      certification.

Bank OZK is a regional bank headquartered in Little Rock,
Arkansas.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 30, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/336UPsl at no extra charge.[CC]

BAR PRODUCTS.COM: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Bar Products.com,
Inc. The case is styled as Robert Weekes, individually, and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. Bar Products.com, Inc.,
Case No. 1:21-cv-11162 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Bar Products -- https://barproducts.com/ -- has been supplying the
bar and restaurant industry since 1995 with the latest bartending
tools, bar supplies, bar decor and more.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Edward Y. Kroub, Esq.
          MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
          200 Vesey Street, Ste. 24th Floor
          New York, NY 10281
          Phone: (212) 595-6200
          Email: ekroub@mizrahikroub.com


BEACH HOUSE: Must Response to Class Certification Bid by Jan. 14
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Nygaard, et al., v. Beach
House Hospitality Group LLC, et al., Case No. 4:20-cv-00233
(D.S.C.), the Hon. Judge Joseph Dawson, III entered an order on
motion for extension of time as follows:

  -- Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' motion to certify class
     shall be filed on or before January 14, 2022; and

  -- Plaintiffs' Reply shall be due 14 days from the filing of
     Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs motion to certify.

The suit alleges violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.[CC]


BERKELEY LIGHTS: Kessler Topaz Reminds of February 7 Deadline
-------------------------------------------------------------
Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP Berkeley Lights, Inc. notify
investors that a class action proceeding has been filed against
("Berkeley Lights") (NASDAQ: BLI). The proceedings accuse Berkeley
Wright of violating federal securities law, including omissions and
fraudulent misrepresentations related to the company's business,
operations, and outlook. Berkeley Lights investors suffered
significant losses as a result of Berkeley Lights' virtually
misleading remarks to the general public.

Plaintiff's deadline: February 7, 2022

Class period: July 17, 2020 finished September 14, 2021

Contact a lawyer to discuss your rights:

James Malo, Esq. (484) 270-1453 or Call charges are free (844)
887-9500 or email info@ktmc.com

Berkeley LIGHTS'S Alleged misconduct

Berkeley Lights, headquartered Emeryville, California is a digital
cell biology company focused on enabling and accelerating the rapid
development, commercialization and acceleration of biotherapy and
other cell-based products.

Upon September 15, 2021, Scorpion Capital has published a research
report on Berkeley Lights. $ 2 million It's a clumsy black box
while insiders and Silicon Valley big wigs are competing to throw
away stock. Just another VC pump with 27 times the sales. target
price: $ 0The report criticized Berkeley Light's technology and
questioned Berkeley Light's most important business relationships
and the sustainability of its business growth plans. In addition,
the report found that negative customer experiences further weighed
on Berkeley Light's growth potential. Trajectory of customers
claiming to be "fooled", misunderstood, or over-promised to buy $ 2
million "The reality is so far" that concluded "lemon" [Berkeley
Lights's] A spectacular hype that we believe that the product's
claims and practices could constitute a complete scam."

Following this news, Berkeley Lights' share price fell nearly 30%
in two trading days. $ 23.53 Per share September 16, 2021..

Berkeley Lights Investors At the latest February 7, 2022Demands to
be appointed as the main plaintiff's representative of the class
through Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP Or you may choose to
remain a member of another lawyer, or a class that was absent
without doing anything. Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP Berkeley
Lights investors who have suffered significant losses are advised
to contact the company directly for more information.

Who can be the primary plaintiff?

The plaintiff chief is the representative party acting on behalf of
all class members in conducting proceedings. The main plaintiff is
usually an investor or a small group of investors who have the
greatest financial benefit and are appropriate and typical for the
proposed class of investors. The Chief Plaintiff selects the Chief
Plaintiff and the attorneys representing the class, who, if
approved by the court, are the Chief or Class attorneys. The
ability to share recovery is unaffected by the decision to act as
the main plaintiff.

About KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP

Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP Prosecute class actions in state
and federal courts nationwide and around the world. The company has
built a global reputation for excellence and has recovered billions
of dollars for victims of fraud and other corporate fraud. All of
our work is driven by the common goal of protecting investors,
consumers, employees and others from fraud, abuse, misconduct and
negligence by businesses and trustees. After all, if the bad guys
paid and recovered their assets, we were successful. The
proceedings in this proceeding were not filed by Kessler Topaz
Meltzer & Check, LLP.For more information Kessler Topaz Meltzer &
Check, LLP Please come www.ktmc.com. [GN]

BISMILLAH 1: Santiago Suit Seeks Minimum Wages for Pharmacy Clerks
------------------------------------------------------------------
CARLOS SANTIAGO INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY
SITUATED v. BISMILLAH 1 CORPORATION (DBA ELTON PHARMACY) KHALID
MASOOD, Case No. 1:22-cv-00050 (E.D.N.Y., Jan. 4, 2022) seeks to
recover minimum wage damages for the Plaintiff and similarly
situated co-workers who have been employed by Defendants as
Pharmacy Clerks  pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act , the New
York Labor Law, and the Wage Theft Prevention Act.

The Plaintiff is a former employee of Defendants who was a pharmacy
clerk at their Brooklyn location.

The Defendants operate a pharmacy where the Plaintiff worked.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Lina Stillman, Esq.
          STILLMAN LEGAL, P.C.
          42 Broadway, 12th Floor
          New York, NY 10004
          Telephone: (212) 203-2417

BOOST INSURANCE: Sends Unwanted Telemarketing Calls, Reimer Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
RUHI REIMER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. BOOST INSURANCE LLC, Defendant, Case No.
1:21-cv-01444 (E.D. Va., December 28, 2021) is a class action
against the Defendant for violations of the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act and the Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act.

According to the complaint, the Defendant transmitted automated
calls to the Plaintiff's telephone number in an attempt to promote
its products and services without obtaining prior express written
consent. The Plaintiff and Class members have been harmed by the
acts of the Defendant because their privacy has been violated, they
were annoyed and harassed, and, in some instances, they were
charged for incoming calls.

Boost Insurance LLC is an insurance provider based in Virginia.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:     
     
         William P. Robinson III, Esq.
         319 N. Piedmont Street, Suite 1
         Arlington, VA 22203
         E-mail: info@robinsonslaw.com

                 - and –

         Avi R. Kaufman, Esq.
         KAUFMAN P.A.
         400 NW 26th Street
         Miami, FL 33127
         Telephone: (305) 469-5881
         E-mail: kaufman@kaufmanpa.com

BSW GENERAL: Singh Suit Seeks Minimum Wages, OT Under FLSA, NYLL
----------------------------------------------------------------
GURDEEP SINGH, RAJINDER SINGH, JASVIR SINGH GHOTRA, GIAN SINGH
MALTANI, JADGWINDER SINGH, AVTAR SINGH, and PRITHVIPAL SINGH,
Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. BSW
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP., RAJINDER SINGH, ARSHJEET SINGH, and QBE
INSURANCE CORPORATION, Case 1:22-cv-00025 (E.D.N.Y., Jan. 3, 2022)
seeks to recover unpaid minimum wages and overtime premium pay
pursuant to Section 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the
New York Labor Law.

The Plaintiffs seek to recover unpaid prevailing wages, daily
overtime and supplemental benefits which they were entitled to
receive for work, including weekend work, they performed on the
Public Works Project.

The Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and all
similarly situated employees of BSW who elect to "opt-in" to this
action.

The Plaintiffs are construction masons/bricklayers, laborers,
workmen and mechanics that provided labor to BSW General in the
performance of BSW's contract with the Sayville Union Free School
District Board of Education for the publicly-financed masonry
reconstruction project at Sayville High School.

BSW General is a remodeling contractor in New York.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Brent E. Pelton, Esq.
          Taylor B. Graham, Esq.
          PELTON GRAHAM LLC
          www.peltongraham.com
          111 Broadway, Suite 1503
          New York, NY 10006
          Telephone: (212) 385-9700

CARDINAL HEALTH: Filing of Class Cert. Bid Due March 25
-------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as LOUISIANA SHERIFFS'
PENSION & RELIEF FUND, v. CARDINAL HEALTH, INC., et al., Case No.
2:19-cv-03347-EAS-EPD (S.D. Ohio), the Hon. Judge Elizabeth Preston
Deavers entered an  preliminary pretrial order as follows:

   -- Plaintiff's Motion for Class          March 25, 2022
      certification due:

   -- Deadline for Defendants to            May 6, 2022
      depose proposed class
      representative(s) due:

   -- Defendants Opposition to Class        June 3, 2022
      Certification due:

   -- Deadline for Plaintiff to             July 1, 2022
      depose Defendants'
      class certification
      exppert(s) due:

   -- Plaintiff's reply in support          July 22, 2022
      of class certification due:

   -- Discovery (Expert) due by:            March 13, 2023

   -- Discovery (Fact) due by:              Nov. 18, 2022

   -- Dispositive motions due by:           March 31, 2023

   -- Primary Expert due by:                Nov. 16, 2022

   -- Rebuttal Expert due by:               Jan. 23, 2023

   -- Settlement Demand due by:             Nov. 18, 2022

   -- Response to Settlement Demand         Dec. 16, 2022
      due by:        

  --  Mediation Deadline:                   Feb. 2, 2023

Louisiana Sheriffs' Pension & Relief Fund provides benefits for
employees of the Sheriffs' Department.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 29, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3q12x0k at no extra charge.[CC]


CASTLE STRATEGIC: Class Cert. Scheduling Order Entered in Akselrod
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as GREGORY AKSELROD, v.
CASTLE STRATEGIC PROPERTIES, LLC, et al., Case No.
2:21-cv-01529-JLR (W.D. Wash.), the Hon. Judge James L. Robart
entered a Rule 16(B) and Rule 23(D)(2) scheduling order regarding
class certification motion as follows:

   -- Deadline to complete discovery            April 8, 2022
      on class certification
      (not to be construed as a
      bifurcation of discovery):

   -- Deadline for Plaintiffs to                May 10, 2022
      file motion for class
      certification (noted on the
      fourth Friday after filing
      and service of the motion
      pursuant to Local Rules W.D.
      Wash. LCR 7(d)(3) unless the
      parties agree to different
      times for filing the response
      and reply memoranda):

Castle Strategic is a real estate company.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 30, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3Gai1EA at no extra charge.[CC]

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS: Scheduling Order Entered in Pavelka Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JACKSON PAVELKA v. CHARTER
COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Case No. 3:20-cv-01557-MPS (D. Conn.), the
Court entered a scheduling order as follows:

  -- Initial disclosures will be served within 30 days from the
     date of this order.

  -- All fact and expert discovery will be completed (not
     propounded) by September 30, 2022. Discovery will not be
     phased.

  -- A damages analysis will be provided by any party who has a
     claim or counter claim for damages by May 30, 2022.

  -- The parties' expert reports on any issues on which they
     bear the burden of proof will be due June 30, 2022.
     Depositions of such experts will be completed July 30,
     2022.

  -- The parties' expert reports on any issues on which they do
     not bear the burden of proof will be due August 30, 2022.
     Depositions of such experts will be completed by September
     30, 2022.

  -- Dispositive motions are due October 30, 2022. The parties
     shall file response and reply briefs within the time limits
     set forth in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure.

  -- Any motion for class certification is due October 30, 2022.

  -- The Joint Trial Memorandum is due November 30, 2022, or 30
     days from the Court's ruling on dispositive motions if any
     are filed, whichever is later.

  -- The case will be ready for trial by December 30, 2022, or
     30 days from submission of the Joint Trial Memorandum,
     whichever is later.

Charter Communications is an American telecommunications and mass
media company with services branded as Spectrum.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 28, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/339oqS8 at no extra charge.[CC]


CHOU TEAM: Filing of Class Certification Bid Due March 4
--------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Erica Reiners,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
Chou Team Realty, LLC d/b/a MonsterLoans, a California limited
liability company, Lend Tech Loans, Inc., a California corporation,
Sean Cowell, an individual, Thomas Chou, an individual, Mikael Van
Loon, an individual, Jawad Nesheiwat, an individual, and Eduardo
Martinez, an individual, Case No. 2:20-cv-06587-SB-ADS (C.D. Cal.),
the Hon. Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. entered an order granting
unopposed motion to modify discovery schedule as follows:

  -- Discovery Deadline (Nonexpert)            Feb. 24, 2022

  -- Discovery Deadline (Expert)               Feb. 24, 2022

  -- Defendants' Expert Disclosures Due:       Jan. 13, 2022

  -- Rebuttal Expert Disclosures Due:          Jan. 27, 2022

  -- Discovery Motion Hearing Deadline:        Feb. 24, 2022

  -- Class Certification Motion Filing         March 4, 2022
     Deadline

  -- Opposition to Class Certification         March 25, 2022
     Motion Due:

  -- Reply ISO Class Certification Motion      April 8, 2022
     Due:

  -- Hearing on Class Certification Motion:    April 29, 2022

A copy of the Court's order dated Jan. 4, 2022 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3G8lBPR at no extra charge.[CC]


CITY DIMENSIONS: Lema Suit Alleges Unpaid Overtime for Laborers
---------------------------------------------------------------
JORGE LEMA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. CITY DIMENSIONS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.,
JOHNNY PARADA., ABC CO. 1 through 10, and JOHN DOE 1 through 10,
Defendants, Case No. 1:21-cv-11055 (S.D.N.Y., December 24, 2021) is
a class action against the Defendants for violations of the Fair
Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the New York Labor Law by failing
to compensate the Plaintiff and similarly situated laborers
overtime pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in a
workweek and failing to provide wage notices.

Mr. Lema was employed as a laborer by the Defendants from 2013
until April 13, 2021.

City Dimensions Construction Services, Inc. is a company that
provides residential and commercial construction, renovation, and
general contracting services, with its principal place of business
located at 220 Wadsworth Avenue, Suite 202, New York, New York.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:          
         
         Thomas H. Andrykovitz, Esq.
         THE LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS H. ANDRYKOVITZ, P.C.
         260 Madison Avenue, 15th Floor
         New York, NY 10017
         Telephone: (917) 719-0505
         E-mail: thomas@thomashenrylaw.com

CLOOPEN GROUP: Kessler Topaz Reminds of February 8 Deadline
-----------------------------------------------------------
The law firm of Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP informs
investors that a securities class action lawsuit has been filed
against Cloopen Group Holding Limited ("Cloopen") (NYSE: RAAS). The
action charges Cloopen with violations of the federal securities
laws, including omissions and fraudulent misrepresentations
relating to the company's business, operations, and prospects. As a
result of Cloopen's materially misleading statements to the public,
Cloopen investors have suffered significant losses.

LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE: February 8, 2022

CLASS PERIOD: February 9, 2021 through May 10, 2021

CONTACT AN ATTORNEY TO DISCUSS YOUR RIGHTS:

James Maro, Esq. (484) 270-1453 or Toll Free (844) 887-9500 or
Email at info@ktmc.com

CLOOPEN'S ALLEGED MISCONDUCT

Cloopen provides cloud-based communications solutions which allow
application programing interfaces and software development kits to
embed messaging, voice call, audio and video, instant messaging,
and other communications into enterprises' applications, services,
and/or business processes.

On February 9, 2021, Cloopen conducted its initial public offering
("IPO"), selling 23 million American Depositary Shares ("ADSs") at
$16.00 per ADS. Then, on March 26, 2021, Cloopen published its 2020
fourth quarter financial results for the period ending December 31,
2020. Cloopen reported revenues of only $39.6 million ($2 million
short of analysts' consensus), as well as net losses of $46.8
million (a 466.9% increase year-over-year), and operating expenses
of $27.6 million (a 30% increase over the fourth quarter of 2019).
In response to its alarming net loss, Cloopen blamed a "change in
fair value of warrant liabilities of . . . US$34.4 million." With
regard to its 59.2% increase in general and administrative
expenses, Cloopen claimed "an increase in the provision for
doubtful accounts resulting from increased in accounts
receivables." Following this news, Cloopen's ADS price fell $2.67
per ADS, or 18.52%, to close at $11.75 per ADS on March 26, 2021.

Then, on May 10, 2021, Cloopen's share price fell again when the
company filed its 2020 annual report and revealed for the first
time that its dollar-based net customer retention rate for
recurring solutions had fell from 102.7% in 2019 to 86.8% by year
end 2020. Following this news, Cloopen's ADS price fell $0.62 per
ADS, or 6.47%, to close at $8.97 per ADS on May 12, 2021.

WHAT CAN I DO?

Cloopen investors may, no later than February 8, 2022, seek to be
appointed as a lead plaintiff representative of the class through
Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP or other counsel, or may choose
to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Kessler Topaz
Meltzer & Check, LLP encourages Cloopen investors who have suffered
significant losses to contact the firm directly to acquire more
information.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE CASE

WHO CAN BE A LEAD PLAINTIFF?

A lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of
all class members in directing the litigation. The lead plaintiff
is usually the investor or small group of investors who have the
largest financial interest and who are also adequate and typical of
the proposed class of investors. The lead plaintiff selects counsel
to represent the lead plaintiff and the class and these attorneys,
if approved by the court, are lead or class counsel. Your ability
to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision of whether
or not to serve as a lead plaintiff.

ABOUT KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP

Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP prosecutes class actions in
state and federal courts throughout the country and around the
world. The firm has developed a global reputation for excellence
and has recovered billions of dollars for victims of fraud and
other corporate misconduct. All of our work is driven by a common
goal: to protect investors, consumers, employees and others from
fraud, abuse, misconduct and negligence by businesses and
fiduciaries. At the end of the day, we have succeeded if the bad
guys pay up, and if you recover your assets. The complaint in this
action was not filed by Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP. For
more information about Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP please
visit www.ktmc.com.

CONTACT:

Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP
James Maro, Jr., Esq.
280 King of Prussia Road
Radnor, PA 19087
(844) 887-9500 (toll free)
info@ktmc.com

CLOOPEN GROUP: Shareholders Foundation Reminds of Feb. 8 Deadline
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Shareholders Foundation, Inc. announced that a deadline is
coming up on February 8th in the lawsuit that was filed for certain
investors in shares of Cloopen Group Holding Limited (NYSE: RAAS).

Investors who purchased in excess of $200,000 in shares of Cloopen
Group Holding Limited (NYSE: RAAS) have certain options and there
are short and strict deadlines running. Deadline: February 8, 2022.
Those NYSE: RAAS investors should contact the Shareholders
Foundation at mail@shareholdersfoundation.com or call +1 (858)
779-1554.

A lawsuit was filed against Cloopen Group Holding over alleged
Securities Laws violations. The plaintiff alleges that the
Registration Statement that was filed in connection with the
Company's February 2021 the initial public offering ("IPO") failed
to disclose that, Cloopen Group Holding Limited's growth strategy
was allegedly not working, and its existing customers were
abandoning the Company.

The plaintiff further alleges that the Registration Statement
failed to disclose that an increasing number of Cloopen Group
Holding Limited's customers were refusing to pay, forcing the
Company to record massive increases in its accounts receivables and
allowance for doubtful accounts, and that the Registration
Statement also allegedly failed to disclose that Cloopen Group
Holding Limited was weighed down by huge liabilities related to the
fair value of certain recently-granted warrants.

Those who purchased shares of Cloopen Group Holding Limited (NYSE:
RAAS) should contact the Shareholders Foundation, Inc.

The Shareholders Foundation, Inc. is a professional portfolio legal
monitoring and a settlement claim filing service, which does
research related to shareholder issues and informs investors of
securities class actions, settlements, judgments, and other legal
related news to the stock/financial market. The Shareholders
Foundation, Inc. is not a law firm. Any referenced cases,
investigations, and/or settlements are not filed/initiated/reached
and/or are not related to Shareholders Foundation. The information
is only provided as a public service. It is not intended as legal
advice and should not be relied upon.

Contact information:
Shareholders Foundation, Inc.
Michael Daniels
+1 (858) 779-1554
mail@shareholdersfoundation.com
3111 Camino Del Rio North
Suite 423
San Diego, CA 92108 [GN]

COLGATE-PALMOLIVE: Rodriguez Sues Over Sunscreen's Benzene Content
------------------------------------------------------------------
Teresa Rodriguez, individually on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Colgate-Palmolive Company and Elta
MD, Inc., Defendants, Case No. 1:21-cv-11002 (S.D.N.Y., December
22, 2021) is a class action seeking remedy on the deceptive and
misleading business practices of Colgate-Palmolive Company and Elta
MD, Inc. with respect to the marketing and sale of Defendants' Elta
MD UV Aero Broad-Spectrum Full-Body Sunscreen Spray, SPF 45
sunscreen product throughout the state of New York and throughout
the United States.

According to the complaint, the Defendants specifically list both
the active and inactive ingredients of this product but fail to
disclose that such product contains "benzene," a widely recognized
and incredibly dangerous substance, especially in the context of
applying it to the skin.

Accordingly, the Defendants' alleged conduct violated and continues
to violate, inter alia, New York General Business Law. The
Defendants also breached and continue to breach their warranties
regarding the product. In addition, Defendants have been and
continue to be unjustly enriched. Lastly, Plaintiff brings a claim
for medical monitoring costs associated with testing, monitoring,
and remediating the effects of benzene exposure, adds the suit.

Colgate-Palmolive Company is a conglomerate and owns some of the
world's leading brands for healthcare products.

Elta MD, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of and/or 100%
controlled by Colgate-Palmolive Company, which is also responsible
for the manufacturing, marketing, advertising, and distributing of
the product.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jason P. Sultzer, Esq.
          Joseph Lipari, Esq.
          Daniel Markowitz, Esq.
          THE SULTZER LAW GROUP P.C.
          270 Madison Avenue, Suite 1800
          New York, NY 10016
          Telephone: (845) 483-7100
          Facsimile: (888) 749-7747
          E-mail: sultzerj@thesultzerlawgroup.com
                  liparij@thesultzerlawgroup.com
                  markowitzd@thesultzerlawgroup.com

               - and -

          David C. Magagna Jr., Esq.
          Charles E. Schaffer, Esq.
          LEVIN SEDRAN & BERMAN
          510 Walnut Street, Suite 500
          Philadelphia, PA 19106
          Telephone: (215) 592-1500
          E-mail: dmagagna@lfsblaw.com
                  cschaffer@lfsblaw.com

COLLECTO INC: Davis Must File Class Cert. Bid by May 20
-------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as BRENDA DAVIS and CLARENCE
DAVIS, individually, and on behalf of all other similarly situated
individuals, v. COLLECTO, INC. d/b/a EOS CCA, Case No.
3:21-cv-00044 D (S.D.W.Va.), the Hon. Judge Robert C. Chambers
entered an order granting joint motion to extend time for the
Plaintiffs to move for class certification.

The Plaintiffs shall file their motion for class certification by
May 20, 2022. The Court directs the Clerk to transmit copies of
this Order to counsel of record.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 23, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3mV0vMZ at no extra charge.[CC]

CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING: Henry Files FDCPA Suit in M.D. Florida
--------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Convergent
Outsourcing, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Shonna Henry,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v.
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., John Does 1-25, Case No.
3:21-cv-01288-HES-PDB (M.D. Fla., Dec. 20, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act.

Convergent -- https://www.convergentusa.com/outsourcing/ -- is one
of America's leading collections agencies.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Justin Zeig, Esq.
          ZEIG LAW FIRM, LLC
          3595 Sheridan Street, Suite 310
          Hollywood, FL 33021
          Phone: (754) 217-3084
          Fax: (754) 217-3084
          Email: justin@zeiglawfirm.com


CORIZON HEALTH: Class Cert. Bid Filing Extended to April 8
----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as BRUCE MORRELLI, et al., v.
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., Case No. 1:18-cv-01395-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal.),
the Hon. Judge Stanley A. Boone entered an order modifying
scheduling order following informal conference:

   -- Class Certification Motion Filing Deadline, currently set
      for February 4, 2022, shall be extended to April 8, 2022.

On January 4, 2022, the parties attended an informal status
conference via Zoom videoconference before the Court to discuss the
remaining deadlines in the scheduling order for this action and
amending the scheduling order.

The Court notes the scheduling order was previously modified as to
other deadlines, and the only remaining deadline still pending is
the class certification motion filing deadline, which is currently
set for February 4, 2022.

A copy of the Court's order dated Jan. 4, 2022 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3G7rv3u at no extra charge.[CC]



COSTCO WHOLESALE: Canela Suit Underway in Calif. State Court
------------------------------------------------------------
Costco Wholesale Corporation remains a defendant in the case,
Canela v. Costco Wholesale Corp., et al. (Case No.
2013-1-CV-248813; Santa Clara Superior Court), the company
disclosed in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarterly period ending
November 21, 2021.

The Company is a defendant in an action commenced in August 2013
under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act
(PAGA) alleging violation of California Wage Order 7-2001 for
failing to provide seating to employees who work at entrance and
exit doors in California warehouses. The complaint seeks relief
under the California Labor Code, including civil penalties and
attorneys' fees. The Company filed an answer denying the material
allegations of the complaint.

Costco Wholesale Corporation operates membership warehouses and
e-commerce websites.

COSTCO WHOLESALE: De Benning Labor Suit Underway
------------------------------------------------
Costco Wholesale Corporation has yet to respond to the complaint in
the case, De Benning v. Costco Wholesale Corp. (Calif. Super.
Court, Sacramento, Case No. 34-2021-00309030-CU-OE-GDS), Costco
disclosed in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarterly period ending
November 21, 2021.

In September 2021, an employee filed a class action against the
Company alleging violations of the California Labor Code regarding
the alleged failure to provide sick pay, failure to timely pay
wages due at separation from employment, and for violations of
California's unfair competition law. The Company has not yet
responded to the complaint.

Costco Wholesale Corporation operates membership warehouses and
e-commerce websites.

COSTCO WHOLESALE: Files Reply to Edwards' Labor Suit
----------------------------------------------------
Costco Wholesale Corporation has filed an answer to the second
amended class action complaint in the case, Edwards v. Costco
Wholesale Corp. (C.D. Cal., Case No. 5:21-cv-00716), Costco
disclosed in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarterly period ending
November 21, 2021.

In February 2021, Edwards filed a class action against the company
alleging violations of California Labor Code regarding payment of
wages, meal and rest periods, wage statements, reimbursement of
expenses, payment of final wages to terminated employees, and for
unfair business practices.

In May 2021, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint,
which was granted with leave to amend. In June 2021, Edwards filed
an amended complaint, which the company moved to dismiss later that
month. The court granted the motion in part in July 2021 with leave
to amend. In August 2021, Edwards filed a second amended complaint
and filed a separate representative action asserting the same Labor
Code claims and seeking civil penalties and attorneys' fees. The
company denies all material allegations.

Costco Wholesale Corporation operates membership warehouses and
e-commerce websites.

COSTCO WHOLESALE: Lane Suit Underway in Calif. State Court
----------------------------------------------------------
Costco Wholesale Corporation continues to defend against the case,
Lane v. Costco Wholesale Corp. (Case No. CIVDS 1908816; San
Bernardino Superior Court), the Company disclosed in its Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the quarterly period ending November 21, 2021.

In December 2018, a depot employee raised similar claims, alleging
that depot employees in California did not receive suitable seating
or reasonably comfortable workplace temperature conditions.

The Company filed an answer denying the material allegations of the
complaint. In October 2019, the parties reached an agreement to
settle for an immaterial amount the seating claims on a
representative basis, which received court approval in February
2020. The workplace temperature claims continue in litigation.

Costco Wholesale Corporation operates membership warehouses and
e-commerce websites.

COSTCO WHOLESALE: Schwab Suit Underway in Calif. State Court
------------------------------------------------------------
Costco Wholesale Corporation remains a defendant in the case,
Schwab v. Costco Wholesale Corporation (Case No.
37-2020-00023551-CU-OE-CTL; San Diego County Superior Court), the
company disclosed in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarterly period
ending November 21, 2021.

In July 2020, an employee filed an action under PAGA on behalf of
all California non-exempt employees alleging violations of
California Labor Code provisions regarding meal and rest periods,
minimum wage, overtime, wage statements, reimbursement of expenses,
and payment of wages at termination.

In August 2020, the Company filed a motion to strike portions of
the complaint, which was denied, and an answer has been filed
denying the material allegations of the complaint.

Costco Wholesale Corporation operates membership warehouses and
e-commerce websites.

COSTCO WHOLESALE: To Seek Dismissal of Dimas Suit
-------------------------------------------------
In the case, Dimas v. Costco Wholesale Corp. (Case No.
STK-CV-UOE-2021-0006024; San Joaquin Superior Court), Costco will
move to compel arbitration of the plaintiff's individual claims and
to dismiss the class action complaint, the Company disclosed in its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission for the quarterly period ending November 21,
2021.

In July 2021, a former temporary staffing employee filed a class
action against the Company and a staffing company alleging
violations of the California Labor Code regarding payment of wages,
meal and rest periods, wage statements, the timeliness of wages and
final wages, and for unfair business practices.

On September 7, 2021, the same former employee filed a separate
representative action under PAGA asserting the same Labor Code
violations and seeking civil penalties and attorneys' fees. The
complaint has not yet been served.

Costco Wholesale Corporation operates membership warehouses and
e-commerce websites.


DENTALPLANS.COM: Bradley Seeks to Certify Class & Subclass
----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as DEBORAH BRADLEY,
individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, v.
DENTALPLANS.COM and CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Case
No. 1:20-cv-01094-CCB (D. Md.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to
enter an order:

   1. certifying the proposed Class and Subclass:

      -- Class

         "All persons who were non-customers at the time of the
         call (i) whom DentalPlans.com or someone on its behalf
         called using a prerecorded voice, (ii) to a cellular
         telephone number, (iii) for the purpose of trying to
         sell goods or services, (iv) for any consumer who
         signed up by telephone, (v) during any period when the
         marketing script in DP00013 and DP00014 was
         DentalPlans' "consent" practice and procedure;" and

      -- Subclass

         "All members of the Class whose prior DentalPlans plan
         was through Cigna;"

   2. appointing her as class representative;

   3. appoint her attorneys of record as class counsel;

   4. directing the Defendants to produce the class call and
      account records sufficient to identify the Class and
      Subclass members and their associated contact information
      for purposes of effectuating notice under Fed.R.Civ.P.
      23(c)(2)(B); and

   5. granting such other and further relief the Court deems
      reasonable and just.

DentalPlans offers dental discount programs through Cigna Health
and Life Insurance Company and other insurance companies. As part
of its standardized telephone sign-up process and procedure for new
customers, DentalPlans telephone agents read a script that explains
that DentalPlans is gathering the consumer's telephone number "in
case we get disconnected." The script then asks whether it would be
okay if it sends the consumer promotional text messages, and then
asks if the consumer agrees to receive "prerecorded messages"
without reference to telemarketing.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion to certify class dated Dec. 28,
2021 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3HwXZEw
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Alexander H. Burke, Esq.
          Daniel J. Marovitch, Esq.
          BURKE LAW OFFICES, LLC
          909 Davis St., Suite 500
          Evanston, IL 60201
          Telephone: (312) 729-5288
          E-mail: aburke@burkelawllc.com
                  dmarovitch@burkelawllc.com

               - and -

          Peter A. Holland, Esq.
          Emanwel J. Turnbull, Esq.
          THE HOLLAND LAW FIRM, P.C.
          914 Bay Ridge Rd., Ste. 230
          Annapolis, MD 21401
          Telephone: (410) 280-6133
          E-mail: peter@hollandlawfirm.com
                  eturnbull@hollandlawfirm.com

               - and -

          Amanda J. Allen, Esq.
          THE CONSUMER PROTECTION FIRM, PLLC
          401 E. Jackson St., Suite 2340
          Tampa, FL 33602
          Telephone: (813) 500-1500
          E-mail: amanda@theconsumerprotectionfirm.com

DESKTOP METAL: Faruqi & Faruqi Reminds of February 21 Deadline
--------------------------------------------------------------
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is
investigating potential claims against Desktop Metal, Inc.
("Desktop Metal" or the "Company") (NYSE: DM) and reminds investors
of the February 21, 2022 deadline to seek the role of lead
plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed
against the Company.

If you suffered losses exceeding $100,000 investing in Desktop
Metal stock or options between March 15, 2021 and November 15, 2021
and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi
partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext.
1310). You may also click here for additional information:
www.faruqilaw.com/DM.

There is no cost or obligation to you.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading minority and Woman-owned national
securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania,
California and Georgia.

As detailed below, the lawsuit focuses on whether the Company and
its executives violated federal securities laws by making false
and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1)
that there were deficiencies in EnvisionTEC's manufacturing and
product compliance practices and procedures; (2) that the foregoing
deficiencies presented a material risk to the commercialization of
EnvisionTEC's products; and (3) that, as a result of the foregoing,
Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business,
operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked
a reasonable basis.

On February 16, 2021, the Company acquired EnvisionTEC, Inc. and
certain of its affiliates (collectively, "EnvisionTEC"), a provider
of volume production photopolymer 3D printing solutions for end use
parts.

On November 8, 2021, after the market closed, Desktop Metal
disclosed that it was conducting an internal investigation into
certain matters, including "manufacturing and product compliance
practices and procedures with respect to a subset of its
photopolymer equipment and materials at its EnvisionTec US LLC
facility." The Company also stated that the Chief Executive Officer
of EnvisionTec US LLC had resigned.

On this news, the Company's stock fell $0.39, or 4%, to close at
$8.81 per share on November 9, 2021.

Then, on November 15, 2021, after the market closed, the Company
stated that it would notify the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
("FDA") of "compliance issues with certain shipments of
EnvisionTEC's Flexcera dental resins and its PCA4000 curing box."

On this news, Desktop Metal's stock fell $1.19, or 14.8% to close
at $6.83 per share on November 16, 2021, thereby injuring
investors.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest
financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is
adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the
litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the
putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff
through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and
remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any
recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead
plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information
regarding Desktop Metal's conduct to contact the firm, including
whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this
advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior
results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect
to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your
particular case. All communications will be treated in a
confidential manner. [GN]

DIGITAL MEDIA: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
-----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Digital Media
Management Inc. The case is styled as Robert Weekes, individually,
and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Digital Media
Management Inc., Case No. 1:21-cv-11161 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Digital Media Management -- https://digitalmediamanagement.com/ --
is a digital agency dedicated to managing high-profile individuals,
brands and theatrical movie releases across all platforms.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Edward Y. Kroub, Esq.
          MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
          200 Vesey Street, Ste. 24th Floor
          New York, NY 10281
          Phone: (212) 595-6200
          Email: ekroub@mizrahikroub.com


DIRECT ENERGY: Wins Summary Judgment v. Forte
----------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MARTIN FORTE, and THOMAS
AURELIA; JERRY BAGLIONE; and RICHARD SCHAFER, v. DIRECT ENERGY
SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Case No.
6:17-cv-00264-FJS-ATB (N.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge Frederick J.
Scullin, Jr. entered an order:

   1. granting the Defendant's motion for summary judgment; and

   2. denying as moot the Defendant's motion for judgment on the
      pleadings.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 29, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3qRFpAu at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Adam York, Esq.
          Michael J. Aschenbrener, Esq.
          Scott A. Kamber, Esq.
          KAMBERLAW, LLC
          220 North Green Street
          Chicago, IL 60607

               - and -

          David Lloyd Steelman, Esq.
          STEELMAN, GAUNT & HORSEFIELD
          901 North Pine Street, Suite 110
          P.O. Box 1257
          Rolla, MO 65402

The Defendant is represented by:

          Diane S. Wizig, Esq.
          Michael D. Matthews, Jr., Esq.
          James Monroe Chambers, Esq.
          MCDOWELL HETHERINGTON LLP
          1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2700
          Houston, TX 77002

          Steven M. Lucks, Esq.
          FISHKIN LUCKS LLP
          One Gateway Center, Suite 1150
          Newark, NJ 07102

DIRECTTOU LLC: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
-----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against DirectToU, LLC. The
case is styled as Robert Weekes, individually, and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. DirectToU, LLC, Case No. 1:21-cv-11160
(S.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

DirectToU LLC is the parent company of several wholesale and
direct-to-consumer distributors of music, video and software.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Edward Y. Kroub, Esq.
          MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
          200 Vesey Street, Ste. 24th Floor
          New York, NY 10281
          Phone: (212) 595-6200
          Email: ekroub@mizrahikroub.com


DISTRESSED SOLUTIONS: Class Cert. Bid Filing Extended to Feb. 18
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Estevez v. Distressed
Solutions, LLC, Case No. 1:21-cv-22770 (S.D. Fla.), the Hon. Judge
Jose E. Martinez entered an order extending the deadline to file a
motion to certify class through and including February 18, 2022.

No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.
All other deadlines in the Court's Scheduling Order shall remain in
effect, says Judge Martinez.

The nature of suit states Other Statutory Actions involving
Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment.[CC]

DMD MANAGEMENT: Spencer Seeks Extension to File Class Cert Reply
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ALISA SPENCER, on behalf
of herself and others similarly situated, v. DMD MANAGEMENT, INC.
D/B/A LEGACY HEALTH SERVICES, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01698-CAB
(N.D. Ohio), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order
granting a two-week extension of time for Plaintiff to file her
reply to the Defendants' Response to Motion for Conditional
Certification and Court-Supervised Notice to Potential Opt-In
Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff's reply is currently due on December 29, 2021. The
Plaintiff requests that she be permitted to file her reply on or
before January 12, 2022. Defendants do not oppose this request, the
lawsuit says.

DMD Management provides healthcare services.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion to certify class dated Dec. 27,
2021 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3F2eAyI
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Robi J. Baishnab, Esq.
          NILGES DRAHER LLC
          1360 E. 9th Street, Suite 808
          Cleveland, OH 44114
          Telephone: (216) 230-2955
          Facsimile: (330) 754-1430
          E-mail: rbaishnab@ohlaborlaw.com

               - and -

          Shannon M. Draher, Esq.
          7266 Portage Street, N.W., Suite D
          Massillon, OH 44646
          Telephone: (330) 470-4428
          Facsimile: (330) 754-1430
          E-mail: sdraher@ohlaborlaw.com

DOCUSIGN INC: Rosen Law Firm Reminds of February 22 Deadline
------------------------------------------------------------
WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds
purchasers of the securities of DocuSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: DOCU)
between March 27, 2020 and December 2, 2021, both dates inclusive
(the "Class Period"), of the important February 22, 2022 lead
plaintiff deadline in securities class action commenced by the
Firm.

SO WHAT: If you purchased DocuSign securities during the Class
Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any
out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the DocuSign class action, go to
http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2221.htmlor call Phillip
Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or
cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action. A class
action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead
plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than February 22, 2022.
A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of
other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel
with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms
issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or
any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not
actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting
counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the
globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and
shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the
largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese
Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class
Action Services for number of securities class action settlements
in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013
and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In
2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In
2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a
Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been
recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants
throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements
and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the impact of the Covid-19
pandemic on DocuSign's business was positive, not negative; (2)
DocuSign misrepresented the role that the Covid-19 pandemic had on
its growth; (3) DocuSign downplayed the impact that a "return to
normal" would have on the Company's growth and business; and (4) as
a result, defendants' public statements were materially false
and/or misleading at all relevant times. When the true details
entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered
damages.

To join the DocuSign class action, go to
http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2221.htmlor call Phillip
Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or
cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are
not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select
counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member
and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any
potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead
plaintiff.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar
outcome.

Contacts
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
lrosen@rosenlegal.com
pkim@rosenlegal.com
cases@rosenlegal.com
www.rosenlegal.com [GN]

DRAPER JAMES: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Draper James, LLC.
The case is styled as Robert Weekes, individually, and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. Draper James, LLC, Case No.
1:21-cv-11164 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Draper James -- https://draperjames.com/ -- is a classic, American
lifestyle brand founded by Reese Witherspoon, inspired by her roots
in the South.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Edward Y. Kroub, Esq.
          MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
          200 Vesey Street, Ste. 24th Floor
          New York, NY 10281
          Phone: (212) 595-6200
          Email: ekroub@mizrahikroub.com



DREYERS GRAND: Scheduling, Discovery Order Entered in Zurliene
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as PATRICIA ZURLIENE,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
DREYERS GRAND ICE CREAM, INC., Case No. 3:21-cv-00747-DWD (S.D.
Ill.), the Hon. Judge David W. Dugan entered an order adopting
joint report and proposed scheduling and discovery order.

The Court said, "Depositions upon oral examination,
interrogatories, requests for documents, and answers and responses
thereto shall not be filed unless on order of the Court.
Disclosuresor discovery under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)
are to be filed with the Court only to the extent required by the
final pretrial order, other Court order, or if a dispute arises
over the disclosure or discovery and the matter has been set for
briefing. The parties should note that they may, pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, modify discovery dates set in the
Joint Report by written stipulation, except that they may not
modify a date if such modification would impact (1) the date of any
court appearance, (2) the deadline for completing the mandatory
mediation session or the mandatory mediation process (if
applicable), (3) the deadline for completing all discovery, or (4)
the deadline for filing dispositive motions."

Dreyer's Grand is an American ice cream company, founded in 1928 in
Oakland, California, where its present-day headquarters office
remains.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 22, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3EMrbFP at no extra charge.[CC]

EMPLOYBRIDGE LLC: Underpays Non-Exempt Employees, Matimba Alleges
-----------------------------------------------------------------
WESLEY MATIMBA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. EMPLOYBRIDGE, LLC; REAL TIME STAFFING
SERVICES, LLC; and DOES 1-50, Defendants, Case No. 21STCV46986
(Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty., December 27, 2021) is a class
action against the Defendants for violations of the California
Labor Code's Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 by failing to
pay appropriate minimum wages and failing to provide accurate wage
statements.

The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendants as an hourly-paid,
non-exempt employee in California.

EmployBridge, LLC is a provider of industrial staffing services in
California.

Real Time Staffing Services, LLC is a staffing company based in
California. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:          
         
         Dennis F. Moss, Esq.
         Jeremy F. Bollinger, Esq.
         Ari E. Moss, Esq.
         Jorge A. Flores, Esq.
         MOSS BOLLINGER LLP
         15300 Ventura Blvd., Ste. 207
         Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
         Telephone: (310) 982-2984
         Facsimile: (818) 963-5954
         E-mail: dennis@mossbollinger.com
                 jeremy@mossbollinger.com
                 ari@mossbollinger.com
                 anthony@mossbollinger.com

EOS PRODUCTS: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against eos Products, LLC.
The case is styled as Robert Weekes, individually, and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. eos Products, LLC, Case No.
1:21-cv-11165 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

eos Products -- https://evolutionofsmooth.com/ -- offers
all-natural, hydrating, and deeply moisturizing eos lip balms and
skin care products.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Edward Y. Kroub, Esq.
          MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
          200 Vesey Street, Ste. 24th Floor
          New York, NY 10281
          Phone: (212) 595-6200
          Email: ekroub@mizrahikroub.com


EQUITY RESIDENTIAL: Kaiser Suit Removed to C.D. California
----------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Candice Kaiser, individually and on behalf of
others similarly situated v. Equity Residential Management, LLC,
Transunion Rental Screening Solutions, Inc., Case No. 21STCV42487,
was removed from the Los Angeles Superior Court to the U.S.
District Court for the Central District of California on Dec. 30,
2021.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:21-cv-10024 to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Civil Rights: Accommodations for
Account Receivable.

Equity Residential -- https://www.equityapartments.com/ -- is a
publicly-traded real estate investment trust that invests in
apartments.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.

The Defendants are represented by:

          Shareef Swamy Farag, Esq.
          BAKER AND HOSTETLER LLP
          11601 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1400
          Los Angeles, CA 90025
          Phone:  (310) 820-8800
          Fax: (310) 820-8859
          Email: sfarag@bakerlaw.com


EXICURE INC: Rosen Law Firm Reminds of February 11 Deadline
-----------------------------------------------------------
WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds
purchasers of the securities of Exicure, Inc. (NASDAQ: XCUR)
between March 11, 2021 and November 15, 2021, inclusive (the "Class
Period") of the important February 11, 2022 lead plaintiff
deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Exicure securities during the Class
Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any
out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Exicure class action, go to
http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2207.htmlor call Phillip
Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or
cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action. A class
action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead
plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than February 11, 2022.
A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of
other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel
with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms
issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources or any
meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually
litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel.
The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe,
concentrating its practice in securities class actions and
shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the
largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese
Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class
Action Services for number of securities class action settlements
in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013
and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In
2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In
2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a
Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been
recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants
throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements
and/or failed to disclose that: (1) there had been certain
improprieties in Exicure's preclinical program for the treatment of
Friedreich's ataxia; (2) as a result, there was a material risk
that data from the preclinical program would not support continued
clinical development; and (3) as a result of the foregoing,
defendants' positive statements about Exicure's business,
operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked
a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the
lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Exicure class action, go to
http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2207.htmlor call Phillip
Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or
cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are
not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select
counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member
and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any
potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead
plaintiff.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar
outcome.

Contact Information:

      Laurence Rosen, Esq.
      Phillip Kim, Esq.
      The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
      275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
      New York, NY 10016
      Tel: (212) 686-1060
      Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
      Fax: (212) 202-3827
      lrosen@rosenlegal.com
      pkim@rosenlegal.com
      cases@rosenlegal.com
      www.rosenlegal.com [GN]

EXPRESS LIEN: Filing of Class Certification Bid Due May 13
----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as GRACE L. WILLIAMS v.
EXPRESS LIEN, INC., Case No. 1:21-cv-04611-TWT-LTW (N.D. Ga.), the
Hon. Judge Linda T. Walker entered a scheduling order on Joint
Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan and Guidelines for Discovery
and Motion Practice:

  -- Class discovery will end on:          April 13, 2022

  -- A motion for class certification      May 13, 2022
     must be filed by:

  -- Summary Judgment motions or           30 days after close
     Consolidated Pretrial Order due:      of discovery

Express Lien, doing business as zlien, provides construction
technology platform.

A copy of the Court's order dated Jan. 3, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3G7f8Vd at no extra charge.[CC]

FOGO DE CHAO: Must File Class Cert. Response by Jan. 12
-------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as CHRISTIAN GARCIA-ALVAREZ,
on behalf of himself and those similarly situated, v. FOGO DE CHAO
CHURRASCARIA (PITTSBURGH) LLC, a foreign limited liability company,
et al., Case No. 4:21-cv-00124-ALM (E.D. Tex.), the Defendants ask
the Court to enter an order granting an extension of time up to and
including Wednesday, January 12, 2022 for them to file their
response to the certification motion, and an enlargement of time up
to and including Wednesday, January 26, 2022 for Plaintiff to file
his Reply thereto.

Fogo de Chao is a Brazilian steakhouse.

A copy of the Defendants' motion dated Dec. 28, 2021 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3t3CPKi at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Defendants are represented by:

          Mary Ruth Houston, Esq.
          Paul J. Scheck, Esq.
          SHUTTS & BOWEN LLP
          300 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 1600
          Orlando, FL 32801
          Telephone: (407) 423-3200
          Facsimile: (407) 425-831
          E-mail: mhouston@shutts.com
                  pscheck@shutts.com

FOREST RIVER: Gross FLSA Suit Seeks to Certify Class of Employees
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ALLEN GROSS, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated, v. FOREST RIVER
MANUFACTURING LLC, Case No. 3:21-cv-00616-DRL-MGG (N.D. Ind.), the
Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order pursuant to the Fair
Labor Standards Act (FLSA), as follows:

   (a) Conditionally certifying this case as a collective action
       under the FLSA on behalf of Plaintiff and others
       similarly situated;

   (b) Directing that notice be sent by United States mail,
       email and text message to the following:

       "All current and former employees for Forest River who
       were paid based on rounded time punches (rather than
       actual punch to punch) and who worked forty or more hours
       in at least one workweek from the period of August 19,
       2018, to the present;"

   (c) Approving the proposed Notice and Consent to Join form;

   (d) Directing Defendant to provide within 14 days an
       electronic spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel or comma-
       delimited format a Roster of all individuals that fit the
       definition above that includes their full names, dates of
       employment, last known home addresses, personal email
       addresses, and phone numbers;

   (e) Directing Defendant to provide a Declaration that the
       produced Roster fully complies with the Court's Order;
       and

   (f) Directing that duplicate copies of the Notice may be sent
       in the event new, updated, or corrected mailing
       addresses, email addresses, or phone numbers are found
       for any potential opt-in plaintiff.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion to certify class dated Jan. 3,
2021 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3n7Wd58
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Hans A. Nilges, Esq.
          Robi Baishnab, Esq.
          NILGES DRAHER LLC
          7266 Portage St., N.W., Suite D
          Massillon, OH 44646
          Telephone: (330) 470-4428
          Facsimile: (330) 754-1430
          E-mail: hans@ohlaborlaw.com
                  rbaishnab@ohlaborlaw.com

               - and -

          Robert P. Kondras, Jr., Esq.
          HASSLER KONDRAS MILLER LLP
          100 Cherry Street
          Terre Haute, IN 47807
          Telephone: (812) 232-9691
          Facsimile: (812) 234-2881
          E-mail: kondras@hkmlawfirm.com

               - and -

          Matthew J.P. Coffman, Esq.
          COFFMAN LEGAL, LLC
          1550 Old Henderson Rd., Suite No. 126
          Columbus, OH 43220
          Telephone: (614) 949-1181
          Facsimile: (614) 386-9964
          E-mail: mcoffman@mcoffmanlegal.com

FOUNDATIONS HEALTH: Has Until Jan. 17 to file Class Cert Response
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Cleveland v. Foundations
Health Solutions, Inc., Case No. 1:21-cv-01713 , the Hon. Judge
Christopher A. Boyko entered an order granting Defendant's motion
for extension of time until Jan. 17, 2022 to file response/reply to
Motion for class certification.

The suit alleges violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

Foundations Health is a long-term care company specialized in
physical therapy, skilled nursing and hospice care services.[CC]


FULL SPECTRUM: Hershman Sues Over Unpaid OT for Sales Persons
-------------------------------------------------------------
ADAM HERSHMAN and SUMIT SINGH, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. FULL SPECTRUM LASER LLC,
Defendant, Case No. 2:21-cv-02245 (D. Nev., December 25, 2021) is a
class action against the Defendant for alleged violations of the
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 by failing to compensate the
Plaintiffs and similarly situated sales persons overtime pay for
all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in a workweek and failing to
pay them commission wages.

Mr. Hershman and Mr. Singh have worked for the Defendant as
non-exempt sales persons from September 20, 2021 and September 6,
2021, respectively.

Full Spectrum Laser LLC is a designer and manufacturer of
industrial grade laser products based in Nevada. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:          
         
         Maurice VerStandig, Esq.
         THE VERSTANDIG LAW FIRM, LLC
         1452 W. Horizon Ridge Pkwy., Ste. 665
         Henderson, NV 89012
         Telephone: (301) 444-4600
         Facsimile: (301) 444-4600
         E-mail: mac@mbvesq.com

GEORGIA: Harris Wins Class Certification Bid
--------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as RICARDO HARRIS, et al., on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. GEORGIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Case No. 5:18-cv-00365-TES (M.D.
Ga.), the Hon. Judge Tilman E. Self, III entered an order granting
the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification.

Although the Court has certified Plaintiffs' class, the Court
expresses no opinion as to their potential success on the merits.
The Court will allow class discovery to proceed and, if the parties
can't settle this action on their own, they will face the
inevitable motions for summary judgment and/or decertification in
the future. The parties are to submit a new and updated discovery
order within 30 days from entry of this Order, says Judge Self.

In this action, seven deaf and hard of hearing individuals
incarcerated at various Georgia Department of Corrections (the
"GDC") prison facilities challenge the adequacy of hearing-related
accommodations and services available to them. These individuals --
Ricardo Harris; Tommy Green; Tony Moore, Jr.; Christopher Shields;
Andrew Smith; Darrell Smith, Jr.; and Jorae Smith (collectively,
"Plaintiffs") -- suffer from some form of hearing impairment that
affects their abilities to communicate effectively with others when
deprived of the use of auxiliary aids and/or services, assistive
devices, and other necessary accommodations.

The Plaintiffs allege that Defendants -- the GDC, various GDC
officers, and the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles
("GBOP") deprived them the use of such aids and/or services,
devices, and accommodations in violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (the "ADA"), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation
Act, 29 U.S.C. section 701, et seq.; and the United States
Constitution.

On October 3, 2018, the Plaintiffs filed this putative class action
against the Defendants seeking broad-based declaratory and
injunctive relief. The Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants deny
them and other deaf and hard of hearing prisoners the
accommodations and services that they require to communicate
effectively and participate in GDC programs, services, and
activities -- all in violation of the ADA, Rehabilitation Act, and
the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States
Constitution.

The Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC) is an agency of the
U.S. state of Georgia operating state prisons.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 29, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/32Tto5x at no extra charge.[CC]

GERBER PRODUCTS: Norman Balks at Non-GMO Claims on Food Products
----------------------------------------------------------------
FAITH NORMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY, Defendant, Case No.
5:21-cv-09940 (N.D. Cal., December 22, 2021) is a putative class
action lawsuit against Defendant for cheating consumers, including
Plaintiff, by uniformly advertising, marketing, and selling
nutritional food products under the brand name "Gerber," each of
which prominently features the representations "Non-GMO," or
similar claims related to the absence of ingredients derived from
genetically modified organisms.

Contrary to claims, Defendant's products are allegedly loaded with
ingredients derived from GM-crops such as corn and soy, and many of
Defendant's products also contain protein and/or dairy sources
derived from cows raised on GMO feed. The Defendant's products also
contain numerous artificial ingredients that were genetically
engineered in a laboratory setting using biotechnologies, says the
suit.

The Plaintiff brings this action individually and on behalf of
similarly situated individuals against Defendant for violations of
California's Unfair Competition Law, California's False Advertising
Law, and California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act, breach of
express warranty, breach of the implied warranty of
merchantability, unjust enrichment/restitution, negligent
misrepresentation, fraud, and fraudulent misrepresentation.

Gerber Products Company sells baby food and infant formulas under
the eponymous "Gerber" brand name. Gerber's baby food products and
infant formulas are sold in the U.S., including throughout the
state of California.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          L. Timothy Fisher, Esq.
          Sean L. Litteral, Esq.
          Julia K. Venditti, Esq.
          BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
          1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940
          Walnut Creek, CA 94596
          Telephone: (925) 300-4455
          Facsimile: (925) 407-2700
          E-mail: ltfisher@bursor.com
                  slitteral@bursor.com
                  jvenditti@bursor.com

GOOGLE LLC: Ct. Amends Case Schedule in Brown Class Action
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as CHASOM BROWN, et al., v.
GOOGLE LLC, Case No. 5:20-cv-03664-LHK (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge
Lucy H. Koh entered an order amending the case schedule as
follows:

                 Scheduled Event                 Date

  -- Deadline to Answer Second Amended      January 15, 2022
     Complaint:

  -- Further Case Management Conference:    January 26, 2022

  -- Close of Fact Discovery                March 4, 2022

  -- Opening Expert Reports:                March 18, 2022

  -- Rebuttal Expert Reports:               April 15, 2022

  -- Close of Expert Discovery:             May 19, 2022

  -- Last Day to File Motion for
     Class Certification Motion:            May 26, 2022

  -- Class Certification Hearing            September 22, 2022

Google LLC an American multinational technology company that
specializes in Internet-related services and products, which
include online advertising technologies, a search engine, cloud
computing, software, and hardware.

A copy of the Court's order dated Jan. 4, 2022 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3F9rD1g at no extra charge.[CC]


GOOSEHEAD INSURANCE: Sealy Sues Over Unpaid OT for Service Agents
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MEGAN SEALY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. GOOSEHEAD INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC, Defendant,
Case No. 4:21-cv-00995 (E.D. Tex., December 27, 2021) is a class
action against the Defendant for its failure to compensate the
Plaintiff and similarly situated service agents overtime pay for
all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in a workweek in violation
of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Ms. Sealy has been employed as a service agent by Goosehead in
Westlake, Texas since approximately June 2019.

Goosehead Insurance Agency, LLC is an insurance agency operating
throughout the United States. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:          
         
         Clif Alexander, Esq.
         Austin W. Anderson, Esq.
         Carter T. Hastings, Esq.
         ANDERSON ALEXANDER, PLLC
         819 N. Upper Broadway
         Corpus Christi, TX 78401
         Telephone: (361) 452-1279
         Facsimile: (361) 452-1284
         E-mail: clif@a2xlaw.com
                 austin@a2xlaw.com
                 carter@a2xlaw.com

GRANT BAR & LOUNGE: Koyama Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against The Grant Bar &
Lounge, LLC. The case is styled as Jason Koyama, individually and
on behalf of all similarly situated employees v. The Grant Bar &
Lounge, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, Case No.
STK-CV-UOE-2021-0012015 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Joaquin Cty., Dec.
30, 2021).

The case type is stated as "Unlimited Civil Other Employment."

The Grant Bar & Lounge LLC is located in Tracy, California and is
part of the Drinking Places (Alcoholic Beverages) Industry.[BN]


GRUNT STYLE: Contreras Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Grunt Style, LLC. The
case is styled as Yensy Contreras, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. Grunt Style, LLC, Case No.
1:21-cv-11202 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Grunt Style -- https://www.gruntstyle.com/ -- is an apparel &
fashion company that provides military clothing and uniforms.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jarrett Scott Charo, Esq.
          MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
          200 Vesey Street, Ste. 24th Floor
          New York, NY 10281
          Phone: (212) 595-6200
          Email: jcharo@mizrahikroub.com


GUIDEPOINT GLOBAL: Faces Jones Wage-and-Hour Suit in Sup. N.Y.
--------------------------------------------------------------
ASHLEY JONES, ALEXA LORILLARD, and YEKATERINA BASMAN, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v.
GUIDEPOINT GLOBAL, LLC, Defendant, 533067/20 (Sup. N.Y., Kings
Cty., December 27, 2021) is a class action against the Defendant
for its failure to compensate the Plaintiffs and similarly situated
employees overtime pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours
in a workweek in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Plaintiffs Jones and Lorillard were employed by Guidepoint as
associates in New York from approximately June 2019 to February
2020 and from approximately June 2019 to July 2020, respectively.

Plaintiff Basman was employed by Guidepoint as a research analyst
in New York from approximately August 2017 to March 2019.

Guidepoint Global, LLC is a provider of consulting and research
services based in New York, New York. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:                                 
                                    
         
         Sally J. Abrahamson, Esq.
         WERMAN SALAS P.C.
         335 18th Pl. NE
         Washington, D.C. 20002
         Telephone: (202) 830-2016
         E-mail: sabrahamson@flsalaw.com

GUNITE PROS: Troxel Wins Bid for Conditional Certification
----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MICHAEL TROXEL, etc., v.
GUNITE PROS, LLC, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00057-WS-N (S.D. Ala.),
the Hon. Judge William H. Steele entered an order on Plaintiffs'
Motion for Conditional Certification, for Approval and Distribution
of Notice and for Disclosure of Contact Information as follows:

   1. Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification, for
      Approval and Distribution of Notice and for Disclosure of
      Contact Information is granted;

   2. This case is conditionally certified as an Fair Labor
      Standards Act (FLSA) Collective Action, including both an
      Hourly Employees Collective and a Driver Collective and
      consisting of current and former employees whom Gunite
      Pros employed at any time between January 4, 2018 and
      January 4, 2022;

   3. To facilitate the provision of notice, defendants are
      ordered, on or before January 18, 2022, to produce to
      plaintiffs' counsel in a mutually agreeable format a list
      containing the names, last known addresses, and last known
      email addresses of all Collective Members;

   4. The parties are ordered, on or before January 18, 2022, to
      submit a mutually agreeable form of notice of opt-in
      rights (along with consent forms and follow-up notice) for
      the undersigned's approval;

   5. Within seven calendar days after the Court approves the
      notice of opt-in rights, plaintiffs' counsel must transmit
      the approved Notice and Consent Form to all Collective
      Members by U.S. Mail and electronic mail;

   6. 30 Days after transmission of the Notice and Consent Form,
      plaintiffs' counsel may send follow-up notice by email or
      postcard to Collective Members who have not responded to
      the original notice;

   7. No other mass mailings, notices or transmissions to
      prospective opt-in plaintiffs are authorized by this
      Order; and

   8. All consents must be received and filed by no later than
      90 days after the original transmission of the Notice and
      Consent Form to Collective Members.

A copy of the Court's order dated Jan. 4, 2022 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3qSSd9y at no extra charge.[CC]


HARLEM 421: Underpays Food Supermarket Staff, Pastor Suit Claims
----------------------------------------------------------------
OLGA RODRIGUEZ PASTOR, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. HARLEM 421 FOOD CORP. (DBA KEYFOOD
SUPERMARKET) and ROBERTO ESPINAL, Defendants, Case No.
1:21-cv-11120 (E.D.N.Y., December 28, 2021) is a class action
against the Defendants for violations of the Fair Labor Standards
Act and the New York Labor Law including failure to pay appropriate
minimum wages, failure to pay overtime wages for all hours worked,
and failure to provide wage notices.

The Plaintiff has been employed by the Defendant to work in the
produce section of the supermarket, making salads and cutting
fruit, from 2017 until the present.

Harlem 421 Food Corp. is an owner and operator of KeyFood
Supermarket located at 421 West 125th Street, New York, New York.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                                   
                                  
         
         Lina F. Stillman, Esq.
         STILLMAN LEGAL PC
         42 Broadway, 12th Floor
         New York, NY 10004
         Telephone: (800) 933-5620

HENRY THAYER: Amended Case Management Order Entered in Lisowski
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as CHRISTOPHER LISOWSKI,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
HENRY THAYER COMPANY, INC. and L'Oreal USA, Inc., Case No.
2:19-cv-01339-MJH (W.D. Pa.), the Hon. Judge Marilyn J. Horan
entered a joint motion to amend case management order as follows:

  -- Fact discovery as to Class               Feb. 14, 2022
     Certification due by:

  -- Class Certification motion due by:       March 3, 2022

  -- Opposition to Class Certification        June 2, 2022
     motion due by:

  -- Reply in Support of Class                July 15, 2022
     Certification due by:

  -- Depositions & Document Production        April 25, 2022
     of Plaintiffs Experts re
     Class Certification due by:

  -- Depositions & Document Production        June 30, 2022
     of Defendants Experts re
     Class Certification due by:

  -- Reply in Support of Motion for           Aug. 5, 2022
     Summary Judgment Due by:

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 27, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3qQidmc at no extra charge.[CC]

HOPEBRIDGE LLC: Skevington Sues Over Technicians' Unpaid Overtime
-----------------------------------------------------------------
JACQUELINE SKEVINGTON, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. HOPEBRIDGE, LLC c/o Taft Service
Solutions Corp., Defendant, Case No. 1:21-cv-03105-JPH-MG (S.D.
Ind., December 28, 2021) is a class action against the Defendant
for unpaid overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards
Act and the Indiana Wage Payment Statute.

The Plaintiff was employed as a registered behavior technician at
the Defendant's autism therapy center located at 4422 E. State
Blvd., Fort Wayne, Indiana from November 2019 until her voluntary
resignation around November 2020.

Hopebridge, LLC is a healthcare services provider, with its
principal place of business located at 3500 Depauw Blvd., Suite
3070, Indianapolis, Indiana. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                                   
                                  
         
         Robert P. Kondras, Jr., Esq.
         HASSLER KONDRAS MILLER LLP
         100 Cherry Street
         Terre Haute, IN 47807
         Telephone: (812) 232-9691
         Facsimile: (812) 234-2881
         E-mail: kondras@hkmlawfirm.com

                 - and –

         Matthew J.P. Coffman, Esq.
         COFFMAN LEGAL, LLC
         1550 Old Henderson Road, Suite 126
         Columbus, OH 43220
         Telephone: (614) 949-1181
         Facsimile: (614) 386-9964
         E-mail: mcoffman@mcoffmanlegal.com

                 - and –

         Daniel I. Bryant, Esq.
         BRYANT LEGAL, LLC
         1550 Old Henderson Road, Suite 126
         Columbus, OH 43220
         Telephone: (614) 704-0546
         Facsimile: (614) 573-9826
         E-mail: dbryant@bryantlegalllc.com

IKEA US: Third Scheduling Order Entered in Dukich Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as DIANA and JOHN DUKICH, et
al., v. IKEA US RETAIL LLC, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-02182-HB (E.D.
Pa.), the Hon. Judge Harvey Bartle III entered a third scheduling
order as follows:

   1. The Second Scheduling Order dated September 23, 2021 is
      vacted.

   2. All class certification discovery shall proceed forthwith
      and continue in such a manner as will assure that all
      requests for, and responses to, class certification
      discovery will be served, noticed, and completed by March
      31, 2022.

   3. The Plaintiffs shall serve, on or before March 31, 2022,
      disclosures and reports of any expert witnesses related to
      class certification.

   4. The Defendants shall serve, on or before May 10, 2022,
      disclosures and reports of any expert witnesses related to
      class certification.

   5. The Plaintiffs shall serve, on or before May 24, 2022, any
      reports of rebuttal expert witnesses related to class
      certification responding only to those issues raised for
      the first time in the reports of defendants' experts.

   6. Parties shall conduct any depositions of expert witnesses
      related to class certification on or before July 7, 2022.

   7. The Plaintiffs shall file any amended motion for class
      certification, together with supporting briefs, on or
      before July 21, 2022.

   8. The Defendants shall file any briefs in opposition to
      plaintiffs' amended motion for class certification on or
      before August 18, 2022.

   9. The Plaintiffs shall file any reply briefs on or
      before September 8, 2022.

  10. No brief shall exceed 30 pages in length without approval
      of the Court.

  11. If the parties would like a settlement conference at any
      time during the class certification discovery process,
      they may reach out to the Court to schedule such a
      conference.

Ikea is in the furniture stores business.

A copy of the Court's order dated Jan. 3, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3F0VtVy at no extra charge.[CC]


ILLINOIS FARMERS: Two Classes Certified in Taqueria Suit
--------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as TAQUERIA EL PRIMO LLC,
VICTOR MANUEL DELGADO JIMENEZ, MITCHELLE CHAVEZ SOLIS, BENJAMIN
TARNOWSKI, EL CHINELO PRODUCE, INC., and VIRGINIA SANCHEZ-GOMEZ,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
ILLINOIS FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE,
FARMERS GROUP, INC., TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, FARMERS INSURANCE
COMPANY, INC., and MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No.
0:19-cv-03071-JRT-BRT (D. Minn.), the Hon. Judge John R. Tunheim
entered an order:

   1. denying the defendants' motion to exclude expert
      testimony;

   2. granting in part plaintiffs' motion for class
      certification as to:

      a. The Injunctive Class on all applicable Counts of the
         Second Amended Complaint; and

      b. The Damages Class on Count II of the Second Amended
          Complaint;

   3. denying in part plaintiffs' motion for class certification
      as to the Damages Class on Count IV and Count V of the
      Second Amended Complaint;

   4. certifying two classes:

      a. An Injunctive Class defined as

         "All persons or entities or purchased an insurance
         policy on or after January 17, 2013 within the State of
         Minnesota from any of the Defendant Insurers that
         provided for medical expense benefits under Minnesota's
         No Fault Act, and who maintain that policy;"

      b. A Damages Class defined as

         "All persons or entities or purchased an insurance
         policy on or after January 17, 2013 within the State of
         Minnesota from any of the Defendant Insurers that
         provided for medical expense benefits under Minnesota's
         No Fault Act;"

      c. Defendants' employees or officers, any entity in which
         any Defendant has a controlling interest, any entity
         that has a controlling interest in any Defendant,
         Defendants' legal representatives, Defendants' assigns
         and successors, any judge and any judicial staff and
         any immediate family of any judge to whom this case is
         assigned, and any juror to whom this case is assigned
         are excluded from both classes.

   5. appointing two sets of class representatives;

      a. For the Injunctive Class: Virginia Sanchez-Gomez and El
         Chinelo Market LLC; and

      b. For the Damages Class: Taqueria El Primo LLC, Mitchelle
         Chavez Solis, El Chinelo Produce, Inc., Virginia
         Sanchez-Gomez, Benjamin Tarnowski, and El Chinelo
         Market LLC; and

   6. appointing Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Hellmuth &
      Johnson PLLC, and Sawicki & Phelps, P.A. as class counsel
      for both classes.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 28, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3HBAp9Y at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Anne T. Regan, Esq.
          Nathan D. Prosser, Esq
          HELLMUTH & JOHNSON PLLC, 8050
          West Seventy-Eighth Street
          Edina, MN 55439

               - and -

          David W. Asp, Esq.
          Derek C. Waller, Esq.
          Jennifer Jacobs, Esq.
          Kristen G. Marttila, Esq.
          Stephen Matthew Owen, Esq.
          LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP
          100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 2200
          Minneapolis, MN 55401

               - and -

          Paul J. Phelps, Esq.
          SAWICKI & PHELPS
          5758 Blackshire Path
          Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076

The Defendants are represented by:

          Emily C. Atmore, Esq.
          Marc A. Al, Esq.
          Margaret E. Dalton, Esq.
          STOEL RIVES LLP
          33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4200
          Minneapolis, MN 55402

               - and -

          Timothy W. Snider, Esq.
          STOEL RIVES LLP
          760 Southwest Ninth Avenue, Suite 3000
          Portland, OR 97205

INAMORATA SWIM: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Inamorata Swim, LLC.
The case is styled as Robert Weekes, individually, and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. Inamorata Swim, LLC, Case No.
1:21-cv-11166 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Inamorata (formally Inamorata Swim) --
https://www.inamoratawoman.com/ -- is a brand designed by Emily
Ratajkowski that launched as a swimwear line.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Edward Y. Kroub, Esq.
          MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
          200 Vesey Street, Ste. 24th Floor
          New York, NY 10281
          Phone: (212) 595-6200
          Email: ekroub@mizrahikroub.com


IOVATE HEALTH: Schoonover Suit Seeks to Certify Class Action
------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as EMILEY SCHOONOVER,
individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals, v.
IOVATE HEALTH SCIENCES U.S.A. INC., a Delaware corporation, Case
No. 2:20-cv-01487-FLA-AGR (C.D. Cal.), the Plaintiff asks the Court
to enter an order:

   1. certifying class action on behalf of:

      "All persons who, on or after February 13, 2017, purchased
      in the state of California for household use and not for
      resale or distribution any of Defendant's Six Star Pre-
      Workout Explosion and Defendant’s Six Star Pre-Workout
      Explosion Ripped products in a 32 ounce or 20 ounce
      container;"

      That governmental entities, Iovate, and its affiliates,
      subsidiaries, employees, current and former officers,
      directors, agents, and representatives, and the members of
      this Court and its staff are excluded from the Class; and

   2. appointing McGuire Law, P.C. as Class Counsel for the
      the Class.

Iovate Health was founded in 2003. The company's line of business
includes the warehousing and storage of a general line of goods.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion to certify class dated Dec. 24,
2021 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3JCaxwm
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Eugene Y. Turin, Esq.
          MCGUIRE LAW, P.C.
          55 W. Wacker Dr., 9th Fl.
          Chicago, IL 60601
          Telephone: (312) 893-7002
          E-mail: eturin@mcgpc.com


IQVIA INC: Filing of Class Certification Bid Due Jan. 18, 2023
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as RICHARD E. FISCHBEIN, MD,
individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated
persons, v. IQVIA, INC., Case No. 2:19-cv-05365-NIQA (E.D. Pa.),
the Hon. Judge Nitza I. Quinones Alejandro entered an order as
follows:

   1. All fact discovery shall be           August 31, 2022
      completed by:

   2. The Plaintiff's expert reports        September 23, 2022
      shall be due by:

   3. The Defendant's expert reports        November 11, 2022
      are due by:

   4. Any rebuttal expert reports           November 30, 2022
      are due by:

   5. All expert depositions shall          December 21, 2022
      be completed by:

   6. Plaintiff's motion for class          January 18, 2023
      certification shall be filed by:

IQVIA Inc. provides healthcare research services.

A copy of the Court's order dated Jan. 3, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3zCMhWa at no extra charge.[CC]

JOHN HANCOCK: Leonard Seeks Initial Nod of Settlement
-----------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JEFFREY LEONARD, IN HIS
CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE POPLAWSKI 2008 INSURANCE TRUST, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, et al., v.
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK and JOHN HANCOCK
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (U.S.A.),Case No. 1:18-cv-04994-AKH
(S.D.N.Y.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order:

   1. preliminarily approving the Settlement and distribution
      plan;

   2. preliminarily certifying the Settlement Class and
      appointing Plaintiffs as Class Representatives and Susman
      Godfrey L.L.P. as Class Counsel for purposes of the
      Settlement;

   3. approving the form and manner of notice to the Settlement
      Class, directing notice under Rule 23(e)(1); and

   4. scheduling a final approval hearing at which the Court
      will consider final approval of the Settlement, final
      approval of the distribution plan, and Class Counsel's
      motion for fees and costs.

The Plaintiffs include PHYLLIS POPLAWSKI; PBR PARTNERS, BRIGHTON
TRUSTEES, LLC, on behalf of and as trustee for COOK STREET MASTER
TRUST III; BANK OF UTAH, solely as security intermediary for COOK
STREET MASTER TRUST III; PEAK TRUST COMPANY, AK, on behalf of and
as trustee for SUSAN L. CICIORA TRUST and STEWART WEST INDIES
TRUST; and ADVANCE TRUST & LIFE ESCROW SERVICES, LTA, as securities
intermediary for LIFE PARTNERS POSITION HOLDER TRUST.

John Hancock NY is a stock life insurance company.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated Dec. 30, 2021 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3n13qE7 at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Seth Ard, Esq.
          Ryan Kirkpatrick, Esq.
          Zachary B. Savage, Esq.
          Ari Ruben, Esq.
          Amy Gregory, Esq.
          Steven Sklaver, Esq.
          Glenn Bridgman, Esq.
          Andres Healy, Esq.
          SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
          1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
          New York, NY 10019
          Telephone: (212) 336-8330
          Facsimile: (212) 336-8340
          E-mail: sard@susmangodfrey.com
                  rkirkpatrick@susmangodfrey.com
                  zsavage@susmangodfrey.com
                  aruben@susmangodfrey.com
                  ssklaver@susmangodfrey.com
                  gbridgman@susmangodfrey.com
                  ahealy@susmangodfrey.com

KE HOLDINGS: Bragar Eagel Reminds of February 28 Deadline
---------------------------------------------------------
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized stockholder
rights law firm, reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has
been filed against KE Holdings Inc. ("KE Holdings" or the
"Company") (NYSE: BEKE) in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York on behalf of all persons and entities
who purchased or otherwise acquired KE Holdings ADSs between August
13, 2020 and December 16, 2021, both dates inclusive (the "Class
Period"). Investors have until February 28, 2022 to apply to the
Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.

The action arises out of the Company's misstatements materially
overstating its store count, agent counsel, new home sales gross
transaction value ("GTV"), and revenues. The complaint alleges that
defendants made materially false and misleading statements and
omissions, and engaged in a scheme to deceive the market. The truth
began to come to light when Muddy Waters Capital LLC, a research
based equity investor, revealed that KE Holdings was overstating
the agents and stores on its platforms, its GTV, and its revenues,
among other wrongdoing. These misstatements artificially inflated
the price of KE Holdings' ADSs and operated as a fraud or deceit on
the Class. When the truth was revealed, the Company's ADS price
fell substantially and has continued falling since.

If you purchased or otherwise acquired KE Holdings ADSs and
suffered a loss, are a long-term stockholder, have information,
would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions
concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with
respect to these matters, please contact Brandon Walker or
Alexandra Raymond by email at investigations@bespc.com, telephone
at (212) 355-4648, or by filling out this contact form. There is no
cost or obligation to you.

About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.:

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm
with offices in New York, California, and South Carolina. The firm
represents individual and institutional investors in commercial,
securities, derivative, and other complex litigation in state and
federal courts across the country. For more information about the
firm, please visit www.bespc.com. Attorney advertising. Prior
results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contacts

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.
Brandon Walker, Esq.
Alexandra B. Raymond, Esq.
(212) 355-4648
investigations@bespc.com
www.bespc.com [GN]

KI MOBILITY: Faces Sharpless Wage-and-Hour Suit in W.D. Wisconsin
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ANGELA SHARPLESS, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. KI MOBILITY LLC, Defendant, Case
No. 3:21-cv-00816 (W.D. Wis., December 28, 2021) is a class action
against the Defendant for violations of the Fair Labor Standards
Act and the Wisconsin's Wage Payment and Collection Laws including
failure to pay overtime wages for all hours worked and failure to
pay appropriate regular wages.

The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant as a service
coordinator in Stevens Point, Wisconsin from April 2012 to November
2021.

KI Mobility LLC is an owner and operator of a manufacturing
facility located in Stevens Point, Wisconsin. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                                   
                                  
         
         James A. Walcheske, Esq.
         Scott S. Luzi, Esq.
         David M. Potteiger, Esq.
         WALCHESKE & LUZI, LLC
         235 N. Executive Drive, Suite 240
         Brookfield, WI 53005
         Telephone: (262) 780-1953
         Facsimile: (262) 565-6469
         E-mail: jwalcheske@walcheskeluzi.com
                 sluzi@walcheskeluzi.com
                 dpotteiger@walcheskeluzi.com

KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS: Baldwin Files Suit in W.D. Pennsylvania
------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Koninklijke Philips
N.V., et al. The case is styled as Dwayne Baldwin, James Cahalan,
Bruce Ginsburg, Lary Rosenblatt, Ophile Northington, Joseph Foglio,
Richard Odess, Scott Lebleau, Chris White, Jodi Wolfe, Jill
Leavenworth, Edgardo Montalvo, Christopher Hardford, David
Phillips, Maureen Adams, Patrick Haggerty, Penny Hudson, Alex
Pagnota, Sauveuer Charles Valesco, Barbara Traugh, Randall Traugh,
Rita Conte, Danial Ting, Lance Comerilh, Markk Yafchak, Glenn
Goulding, Richard Radack, Roger Crooks, Gary Jones, Jorge Serrano
Magris, Edith McRee Bowles, Cleo Holz, Joseph R. Kay, III,
Catherine Quinn-Kay, Aimee Frenzel-Drew, Mark Weiner, Bengy
Schimdt, Kent McMillan, Natalie Gottlieb, Shelley Davis, Donna
Cordova, Ruben Hammer, Dan Africk, Allen Craig, Michae Renken,
Dorse Dale Green, Bob Iwan, Annilaurie Cammack, John Cammack, Jogn
Tennery, Richard Grisham, on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated v. Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North
America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC, Case No.
2:21-cv-01923-JFC (W.D. Pa., Dec. 30, 2021).

The nature of suit is stated as Personal Injury: Health
Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability.

Koninklijke Philips N.V. -- https://www.philips.com/global -- is a
Dutch multinational conglomerate corporation that was founded in
Eindhoven.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Kelly K. Iverson, Esq.
          LYNCH CARPENTER, LLP
          1133 Penn Avenue, 5th Floor
          Pittsburgh, PA 15222
          Phone: (412) 322-9243
          Email: kelly@lcllp.com


KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS: Faces Johnson Suit Over Defective CPAP Devices
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DANNY JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH
AMERICA LLC, and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC, Defendants, Case No.
3:21-cv-00104-RGE-SBJ (S.D. Iowa, December 24, 2021) is a class
action against the Defendants for breach of implied warranty of
merchantability, negligence, and duty to warn.

According to the complaint, the Defendants manufactured and sold
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and BiLevel Positive
Airway Pressure (BiLevel PAP) devices and mechanical ventilators
for sleep and home respiratory care, which contain polyester-based
polyurethane sound abatement foam (PE-PUR Foam). The Defendants
recalled CPAP and BiLevel PAP devices and mechanical ventilators
containing PE-PUR Foam because they determined that (a) the PE-PUR
Foam was at risk for degradation into particles that may enter the
devices' pathway and be ingested or inhaled by users, and (b) the
PE-PUR Foam may off-gas certain chemicals during operation health
risks associated to the devices. As a result of the health risks
associated with continued use of these devices and the recall, the
Plaintiff's CPAP device is now worthless. The Plaintiff will be
forced to replace the device at considerable cost when a
replacement is available, says the suit.

Koninklijke Philips N.V. is a health technology company with its
principal executive offices at Philips Center, Amstelplein 2, 1096
BC Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Philips North America LLC is a health technology company with its
principal place of business located at 222 Jacobs Street, Floor 3,
Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Philips RS North America LLC is a company that manufactures and
markets medical devices with its principal place of business
located at 6501 Living Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:          
         
         Larry D. Helvey, Esq.
         LARRY HELVEY LAW FIRM
         2735 First Avenue SE, Suite 101
         Cedar Rapids, IA 52402
         Telephone: (319) 362-0421
         Facsimile: (319) 362-3496
         E-mail: lhelvey@helveylaw.com

KORENS USA: Taunton Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages for Welders
---------------------------------------------------------------
LANDON TAUNTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. KORENS USA, INC. and ONE SOLUTIONS, LLC,
Defendant, Case No. 3:21-cv-00844-ECM-SMD (M.D. Ala., December 27,
2021) is a class action against the Defendant for its failure to
compensate the Plaintiff and similarly situated welders overtime
pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in a workweek in
violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant as a welder from
November 2020 until September 2021.

Korens USA, Inc. is an automotive company, with its principal place
of business in Auburn, Alabama.

One Solutions, LLC is an agency, with its principal place of
business in Auburn, Alabama. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:          
         
         Courtney Lowery, Esq.
         SANFORD LAW FIRM, PLLC
         Kirkpatrick Plaza
         10800 Financial Centre Pkwy., Suite 510
         Little Rock, AR 72211
         Telephone: (501) 221-0088
         Facsimile: (888) 787-2040
         E-mail: courtney@sanfordlawfirm.com

LANDMARK REALTY: Rhonda Cheatem Files Class Certification Bid
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as RHONDA K. CHEATEM,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
LANDMARK REALTY OF MISSOURI, LLC, Case No. 4:20-cv-00958-BP (W.D.
Mo.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order:

   1. granting her motion for class certification;

   2. appointing her as Class Representative and her counsel as
      Class Counsel; and

   3. granting Plaintiff and the Class any other and further
      relief this Court deems just and proper.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion to certify class dated Jan. 4,
2021 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3n43vHe
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Matthew S. Robertson, Esq.
          A.J. Stecklein, Esq.
          Michael Rapp, Esq.
          STECKLEIN & RAPP CHARTERED
          748 Ann Avenue, Suite 101
          Kansas City, KS 66101
          Telephone: (913) 371-0727
          Facsimile: (913) 371-0727
          E-mail: aj@kcconsumerlawyer.com
                  2mr@kcconsumerlawyer.com
                  msr@kcconsumerlawyer.com

               - and -

          Gina Chiala, Esq.
          Amy Sweeny Davis, Esq.
          HEARTLAND CENTER
          FOR JOBS AND FREEDOM, INC.
          4047 Central Street
          Kansas City, MO 64111
          Telephone: (816) 278-1092
          Facsimile: (816) 278-5785
          E-mail: ginachiala@jobsandfreedom.org
                  amysweenydavis@jobsandfreedom.org

LIBERTY POWER: Sapan Seeks to Certify Class Action
--------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as PAUL SAPAN, individually
and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. LIBERTY POWER
CORP, L.L.C., LIBERTY POWER SUPER HOLDINGS, LLC, LIBERTY POWER
HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 8:21-cv-01749-JLS-KES (C.D. Cal.), the
Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order certifying the case as a
class action.

Liberty Power distributes electricity. The Company offers
electricity to residential, large commercial, and business
sectors.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion to certify class dated Jan. 3,
2021 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3n7WO6S
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Christopher J. Reichman, Esq.
          Justin Prato, Esq.
          PRATO & REICHMAN, APC
          8555 Aero Drive, Suite 303
          San Diego, CA 92123
          Telephone: 619-886-0252
          E-mail: JustinP@prato-reichman.com

LIFETRADE: Plaintiffs Seek to Certify Class Action v. Ruppenthal
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit RE LIFETRADE LITIGATION, Case No.
1:17-cv-02987-JPO-KHP (S.D.N.Y.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to
enter an order:

   1. certifying this action to proceed against Robert
      Ruppenthal, Administrator of the Estate of Roy G. Smith as
      a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a), 23(b)
      (3), and (c)(4);

   2. appointing Plaintiffs Hugo Leonardo Carlini, Martin
      Ricardo Miranda, and Carlos Alberto Wehbi as Class
      Representatives; and

   3. appointing Phillips & Paolicelli, LLP and Waters & Kraus
      LLP as Counsel for the Class.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated Dec. 23, 2021 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3ETH25I at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Steven Phillips, Esq.
          Diane Paolicelli, Esq.
          Marc C. Gorrie, Esq.
          PHILLIPS & PAOLICELLI, LLP
          747 Third Avenue, 6th Floor
          New York, NY 10017
          Telephone: (212) 388-5100
          E-mail: sphillips@p2law.com
                  dpaolicelli@p2law.com
                  mgorrie@p2law.com

               - and -

          Charles Siegel, Esq.
          WATERS & KRAUS LLP
          3141 Hood Street, Suite 700
          Dallas, TX 75219
          Telephone: (214) 357-6244
          E-mail: siegel@waterskraus.com

               - and -

          Michael Armitage, Esq.
          Jillian Rice-Loew, Esq.
          222 N Pacific Coast Highway
          El Segundo, CA 90245
          Telephone: (310) 414-8146
          E-mail: armitage@waterskraus.com
                  jrice-loew@waterskraus.com

MARATHON DIGITAL: Rosen Law Firm Reminds of February 15 Deadline
----------------------------------------------------------------
WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds
purchasers of the securities of Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
f/k/a Marathon Patent Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: MARA) between October
13, 2020 and November 15, 2021, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of
the important February 15, 2022 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Marathon securities during the Class
Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any
out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Marathon class action, go to
http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2229.htmlor call Phillip
Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or
cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action. A class
action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead
plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than February 15, 2022.
A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of
other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel
with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms
issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or
any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not
actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting
counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the
globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and
shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the
largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese
Company. Rosen Law Firm was ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class
Action Services for number of securities class action settlements
in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013
and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In
2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In
2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a
Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been
recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the complaint, defendants
throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements
and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Marathon's joint venture with
Beowulf Energy LLC, as it related to a series of agreements with
multiple parties to design and build a data center in Hardin,
Montana, implicated potential regulatory violations, including U.S.
securities law violations; (2) as a result, the Beowulf Joint
Venture subjected Marathon to a heightened risk of regulatory
scrutiny; (3) the foregoing was reasonably likely to have a
material negative impact on Marathon's business and commercial
prospects; and (4) as a result, defendants' public statements were
materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the
true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors
suffered damages.

To join the Marathon Digital Holdings class action, go to
http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2229.htmlor call Phillip
Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or
cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are
not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select
counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member
and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any
potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead
plaintiff.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar
outcome.

Contacts
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
lrosen@rosenlegal.com
pkim@rosenlegal.com
cases@rosenlegal.com
www.rosenlegal.com [GN]

MARIA'S TAMALES: Vilchis Sues Over Food Truck Drivers' Unpaid OT
----------------------------------------------------------------
SILVESTRE VILCHIS, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MARIA'S TAMALES CORP (DBA EVELIA'S
TAMALES) and EVELIA COYOTZI and DELFINO GARCIA, Defendants, Case
No. 1:21-cv-07149 (E.D.N.Y., December 28, 2021) is a class action
against the Defendants for violations of the Fair Labor Standards
Act and the New York Labor Law including failure to pay appropriate
minimum wages, failure to pay overtime wages for all hours worked,
and failure to provide wage notices.

The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendants to drive and purchase
items for the restaurant and food truck in New York from December
2020 until December 2021.

Maria's Tamales Corp, doing business as Evelia's Tamales, is an
owner and operator of a restaurant and mobile food truck,
headquartered at 9609 Northern Boulevard, Corona, New York. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                                   
                                  
         
         Lina F. Stillman, Esq.
         STILLMAN LEGAL PC
         42 Broadway, 12th Floor
         New York, NY 10004
         Telephone: (800) 933-5620

MAVERICK: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Maverick by Logan
Paul, LLC. The case is styled as Robert Weekes, individually, and
on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Maverick by Logan
Paul, LLC, Case No. 1:21-cv-11167 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Maverick -- https://maverickclothing.com/ -- is a merch brand
started by internet sensation Logan Paul.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Edward Y. Kroub, Esq.
          MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
          200 Vesey Street, Ste. 24th Floor
          New York, NY 10281
          Phone: (212) 595-6200
          Email: ekroub@mizrahikroub.com


MAVRC PIZZA: Walker Sues Over Unreimbursed Automobile Expenses
--------------------------------------------------------------
TREYLAND WALKER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. MAVRC PIZZA, LLC and MICHAEL LOEHR,
Defendants, Case No. 5:21-cv-01200-SLP (W.D. Okla., December 28,
2021) is a class action against the Defendants for their failure to
properly pay minimum wages due to unreimbursed automobile expenses
in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Plaintiff was employed as a delivery driver at the Defendants'
Domino's store located in Lawton, Oklahoma from November 2020 to
March 2021.

MAVRC Pizza, LLC is an operator of Domino's franchise stores,
located at 3713 NE Willow Way, Lawton, Oklahoma. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                                   
                                  
         
         D. Matthew Haynie, Esq.
         FORESTER HAYNIE PLLC
         400 N. St Paul, Suite 700
         Dallas, TX 75201
         Telephone: (214) 210-2100
         Facsimile: (469) 399-1070
         E-mail: matthew@foresterhaynie.com

MCDONALD'S USA: Ries Suit Wins Bid to Certify Class
---------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JENNA RIES, et al., v.
MCDONALD'S USA, LLC, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00002-HYJ-RSK (W.D.
Mich.), the Hon. Judge Hala Y. Jarbou entered an order:

   1. denying the Defendants' motion opposing class
      certification;

   2. granting the Plaintiffs' motion to certify a class;

   3. certifying the following class and subclass under Rule
      23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:

      -- the "Class"

         "All women who worked in a position below the level of
         Assistant Manager at Defendants’ McDonald’s restaurant

         located at 730 North Cedar Street in Mason, Michigan
         during at least one shift with Shawn Banks since
         November 12, 2016;"

      -- the "Title VII Subclass"

         "All members of the Class who worked during at least
         one shift with Shawn Banks since January 12, 2019;"

   4. appointing Plaintiffs' motion to appoint their counsel as
      class counsel; and

   5. denying the Defendants' motion for leave to file a motion
      to disqualify Plaintiff's expert.

McDonald's operates a chain of restaurants.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 29, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3JIwc6b at no extra charge.[CC]

MDL 2804: Costco Remains a Defendant in Opioid Litigation
---------------------------------------------------------
Costco Wholesale Corporation remains a defendant in the case, In re
National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) (N.D. Ohio),
Costco disclosed in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarterly period
ending November 21, 2021.

Beginning in December 2017, the United States Judicial Panel on
Multidistrict Litigation consolidated numerous cases concerning the
impacts of opioid abuses filed against various defendants by
counties, cities, hospitals, Native American tribes, third-party
payors, and others. Included are cases that name the Company,
including actions filed by counties and cities in Michigan, New
Jersey, Oregon, Virginia and South Carolina, a third-party payor in
Ohio, and a hospital in Texas, class actions filed on behalf of
infants born with opioid-related medical conditions in 40 states,
and class actions and individual actions filed on behalf of
individuals seeking to recover alleged increased insurance costs
associated with opioid abuse in 43 states and American Samoa.
Claims against the Company in state courts in New Jersey, Oklahoma,
Utah, and Arizona have been dismissed. The Company is defending all
of the pending matters.

Costco Wholesale Corporation operates membership warehouses and
e-commerce websites.


MEMORIAL HERMANN: Sims Files TCPA Suit in S.D. Texas
----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Memorial Hermann
Health System, et al. The case is styled as Rochelle Sims,
individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v.
Memorial Hermann Health System, John Does 1-10, Case No.
4:21-cv-04225 (S.D. Tex., Dec. 30, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone
Equipment.

Memorial Hermann -- https://www.memorialhermann.org/ -- is
advancing health and personalizing care with hospitals, specialty
programs and services located throughout the Greater Houston
area.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jennifer Ann McLaughlin Filipiak, Esq.
          Marwan Rocco Daher, Esq.
          Omar Tayseer Sulaiman, Esq.
          Victor Thomas Metroff, Esq.
          Mohammed Omar Badwan, Esq.
          SULAIMAN LAW GROUP, LTD.
          2500 S. Highland Avenue, Suite 200
          Lombard, IL 60148
          Phone: (331) 307-7646
          Fax: (630) 575-8188
          Email: jennifer.a.filipiak@gmail.com
                 mdaher@sulaimanlaw.com
                 osulaiman@sulaimanlaw.com
                 vmetroff@sulaimanlaw.com
                 mbadwan@sulaimanlaw.com



MEMPHIS, TN: Wins Bid to Strike Class Allegations
-------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JANE DOE, JANE DOE NO. 2,
AND JANE DOE NO. 3 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CLASS REPRESENTATIVES OF ALL
OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, Case No.
2:13-cv-03002-JTF-cgc (W.D. Tenn.), the Hon. Judge John T. Fowlkes,
Jr. entered an order granting Defendant's motion to strike class
allegations.

On February 19, 2016, the Plaintiffs filed a Response in
Opposition. On February 26, 2016, the Defendant filed a Motion for
Leave to File a Reply and Incorporated Memorandum in Support. On
March 2, 2016, the Plaintiffs filed a Response in Opposition to
Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply.

On March 7, 2016, the Court granted Defendant's Motion for Leave to
File and Reply, and on March 8, 2016, the Defendant filed a Reply.
More than five years later, on November 8, 2021, the Plaintiffs
filed a Notice Regarding Rule 23 Commonality.

A copy of the Court's order dated Jan. 3, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/31DaNKt at no extra charge.[CC]

MILK AND HONEY: Class of Restaurant Staff Conditionally Certified
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ALEXIS WHITE, et al., v.
MILK AND HONEY AT WESLEY CHAPEL,LLC, et al., Case No.
1:21-cv-03231-SDG (N.D. Ga.), the Hon. Judge Steven D. Grimberg
entered an order partly granting the Plaintiffs' motion to
conditionally certify this action as a collective action and to
facilitate notice to potential class members.

The Court conditionally certifies a class comprising of Cooks,
Cashiers, Servers, and Runners who are or were non-exempt employees
of Milk and Honey within three years of the date the class notice
is issued and who were required to work more than 40 hours per week
without overtime pay.

The Court defers ruling on the scope of discovery for the contact
information of putative class members, the contents of the proposed
notice, and the distribution of the notice until the parties have
conferred on these issues. The Court directs the parties to confer
and, within twenty-one days of this Order, to jointly file either
(1) a proposed notice, consent to join form, and distribution
method or (2) a summary of the issues that could not be resolved.

The Plaintiff Alexis White initiated this action on August 9, 2021,
alleging that her employer, Milk and Honey, failed to compensate
her for overtime work in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA). Three other Plaintiffs joined White in bringing this action
and they filed their First Amended Complaint on August 13. On
September 27, the Plaintiffs moved for conditional certification as
a collective action and for approval of a proposed notice to be
sent to potential class members. Milk and Honey does not oppose
conditional certification but, in response to Plaintiffs' motion,
raised several concerns about the information Plaintiffs seek about
potential class members, the form of the proposed class notice, and
the way in which Plaintiffs intend to distribute the notice. Milk
and Honey requested that the Court grant it 21 days to confer with
Plaintiffs to reach a resolution on these issues.

A copy of the Court's order dated Jan. 4, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3t8Tc8p at no extra charge.[CC]


MONDELEZ GLOBAL: Honey Wheat Crackers' Label "False," Wilim Claims
------------------------------------------------------------------
ERIC WILIM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. MONDELEZ GLOBAL LLC, Defendant, Case No.
1:21-cv-06855 (N.D. Ill., December 24, 2021) is a class action
against the Defendant for negligent misrepresentation, fraud,
unjust enrichment, breaches of express warranty, implied warranty
of merchantability/fitness for a particular purpose, and the
Magnuson Moss Warranty Act, and violations of the Illinois Consumer
Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and State Consumer Fraud
Acts.

According to the complaint, the Defendant is engaged in false,
deceptive, and misleading advertising, labeling, and marketing of
its Honey Wheat crackers under the Ritz brand. The Defendant
labeled the product as "Honey Wheat," "5g whole grain per 16g
serving," a honey dipper, and stalks of wheat. However, in reality,
the product is not a good source of fiber based on the nutrition
facts, as it indicates less than one gram of fiber, or 3% of the
daily value, per serving. Consumers are unable to know what percent
of the weight of the serving size of the product is attributable to
grain content compared to the product's other ingredients.
Moreover, the product is sweetened primarily with conventional
sugars and contains a miniscule amount of honey. As a result of the
Defendant's alleged misrepresentations, the Plaintiff and Class
members have sustained damages. Had they known the truth, they
would not have bought the product or would have paid less for it.

Mondelez Global LLC is a consumer products manufacturer, with its
principal place of business in East Hanover, New Jersey. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:          
         
         Spencer Sheehan, Esq.
         SHEEHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
         60 Cuttermill Rd., Ste. 409
         Great Neck, NY 11021
         Telephone: (516) 268-7080
         E-mail: spencer@spencersheehan.com

MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS: Class Cert Bid Filing Extended to March 10
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Nicholas Bontrager,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, FCS INC. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and
each of them, Case No. 2:21-cv-04855-DSF-KS (N.D. Cal.), the Hon.
Judge Dale S. Fischer entered an order granting the parties' joint
stipulation extending the class certification deadline for 60 days,
as follows:

  -- The current deadline set by this Court's standing order
     requiring Plaintiff to file a class certification motion by
     January 10, 2022, is vacated,

  -- The Plaintiff must file a class certification motion by
     March 10, 2022.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 23, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3pU5q2V at no extra charge.[CC]

MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OR: Court Stays Williams Class Action
-------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JEFFERY WILLIAMS, v.
INVERNESS COUNTY JAIL, MEDICAL STAFF; INVERNESS COUNTY JAIL, JAIL
STAFF, Case No. 3:21-cv-01360-AA (D. Or.), the Hon. Judge Ann Aiken
entered an order staying action pending the resolution of class
certification in Clark v. Multnomah Cty.

The Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee at the Multnomah County
Inverness Jail, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section
1983 and alleged violations of his rights under the Fourteenth
Amendment.

Specifically, plaintiff alleges that he contracted COVID-19 as a
result of the conditions at the Inverness Jail and defendants'
alleged failure to protect inmates from contracting the virus.

In Clark v. Multnomah Cty., Case No. 3:21-cv-501-AA, the plaintiffs
filed a proposed class action on behalf of inmates who contracted
COVID-19 in Inverness Jail or the Multnomah County Detention
Center.

Plaintiff arguably would be a member of the proposed class in
Clark, and the Court finds that a stay, in this case, is
appropriate pending a decision in Clark on class certification.

A copy of the Court's order dated Jan. 3, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3qf97jX at no extra charge.[CC]



N&C CLAIMS: Anessia Amoko Wins Collective Action Certification
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Anessia Amoko, on behalf
of herself and others similarly situated, v. N&C Claims Service,
Inc.; Nicholas F. Ierulli; Pam Ierulli; and Seibels Claims
Solutions, Inc., Case No. 3:20-cv-04346-SAL (D.S.C.), the Hon.
Judge Sherri A. Lydon entered an order granting the Plaintiff's
motion for conditional certification of a collective action.

The Plaintiff is directed to revise the notice and consent to sue
form in accordance with the above rulings and submit the same to
the court for final approval by January 10, 2022.

The Plaintiff alleges she was employed by Defendant N&C Claims as
an insurance claims adjuster in Defendant Seibels Claims. The
Plaintiff claims she was incorrectly classified as an independent
contractor, promised (but not paid) a day rate for each day work,
and when moved from a day-rate system to an hourly wage, was not
paid for all hours worked.

According to the Plaintiff, at no time was she paid overtime wages.
On December 16, 2020, Plaintiff filed this collective action on
behalf of herself and others similarly situated. The Plaintiff
seeks damages for alleged violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA) and the South Carolina Wage Payment Act.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 29, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/339kX61 at no extra charge.[CC]


NATIONAL FOOTBALL: Suero Sues Over Giants & Jets' Game Relocation
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ABDIELL SUERO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. NFL, NEW YORK FOOTBALL GIANTS, INC., NEW YORK JETS,
LLC, and METLIFE STADIUM COMPANY, LLC, Case No. 1:22-cv-00031-AJN
(S.D.N.Y., Jan. 3, 2022) is a class action individually and on
behalf of millions of other similarly situated individuals against
Defendants for false advertising, deceptive practices, Civil
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations violations, and
unjust enrichment.

The Plaintiff and similarly situated NFL fans have been damaged by
use of the "New York" ("NY") name and brand and the out-of-state
relocation of both franchises after the NFL Giants and Jets moved
to the State of New Jersey to play football in MetLife Stadium
(formerly Giants Stadium). Defendants have damaged Plaintiff and
the class and syphoned billions of dollars from interstate commerce
that should have been rightfully spent in the State of New York. If
the Yankees, Mets, Knicks, Liberty, Rangers, and other New York
franchises must play in New York and pay premium real estate costs
and taxes to be branded a "NY" sports franchise, it is only fair
that the NFL Giants and Jets do the same or change their name to
accurately reflect the location of their stadium in East
Rutherford, New Jersey, says the suit.

The Plaintiff and the class request equitable relief and monetary
damages.

NFL is a professional football league in the United States founded
on September 17, 1920.

The Plaintiff and millions of class members have suffered damages
by being subjected to expensive and time-consuming transportation
from the City and State of New York to East Rutherford, New Jersey
on game days to watch the Giants or Jets play, by either driving or
mass transportation.

Plaintiff Abdiell Suero is an American citizen and resident of the
City and State of New York and fan of the NFL Giants and Jets.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Evan Spencer, Esq.
          EVAN SPENCER LAW, PLLC
          305 Broadway, 7th Floor
          New York, NY 10007
          Telephone: (917) 547-4665
          E-mail: Evan@EvanSpencerLaw.com

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE: Extension of Class Cert. Deadlines Sought
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as EUGENIO AND ROSA
CONTRERAS, WILLIAM PHILLIPS, TERESA BARNEY, KEITH AND TERESA
MARCEL, SHERLIE CHARLOT, and JENNIE MILLER, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, a
Delaware Limited Liability Company; SOLUTIONSTAR HOLDINGS LLC
(N/K/A XOME HOLDINGS LLC), a Delaware Limited Liability Company;
and SOLUTIONSTAR FIELD SERVICES LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
Company, Case No. 2:16-cv-00302-MCE-JDP (E.D. Cal.), the Parties
ask the Court to enter an order granting their stipulated motion to
stay discovery and extend case deadlines in light of pending
mediation as follows:

              Event                 Current       Proposed
                                    Deadlines     Extended
                                                  Deadlines

  -- Plaintiffs' Reply in       Jan. 12, 2022    April 9, 2022
     Support of Motion for
     Class Certification

  -- Class Certification        Jan. 22, 2022    April 24, 2022
     ExpertDiscovery Cutoff

  -- Merits Discovery Cutoff    Aptil 22, 2022   June 24, 2022

  -- Disclosure of Expert       May 25, 2022     July 27, 2022
     Witnesses and
     Information Required by
     Rule 26(a)(2):

  -- Rebuttal Expert Reports    July 1, 2022     Aug. 2, 2022

  -- Expert Discovery Cutoff:   Aug. 8, 2022     Oct. 10, 2022

  -- Deadline for Parties       Sept. 2, 2022    Nov. 4, 2022
     to File Dispositive
     Motions:

A copy of the Parties' motion dated Dec. 27, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3sYSdrA at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Laura R. Gerber, Esq.
          Dean Kawamoto, Esq.
          KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P.
          1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
          Seattle, WA 98101-3052
          Telephone: (206) 623-1900
          Facsimile: (206) 623-3384
          E-mail: lgerber@kellerrohrback.com
                  dkawamoto@kellerrohrback.com

               - and -

          Thomas E. Loeser, Esq.
          HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO L.L.P.
          1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000
          Seattle, WA 98101
          Telephone: (206) 623-7292
          Facsimile: (206) 623-0594
          E-mail: toml@hbsslaw.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Mary Kate Sullivan, Esq.
          John B. Sullivan, Esq.
          Erik Kemp, Esq.
          Megan C. Kelly, Esq.
          SEVERSON & WERSON
          One Embarcadero Center, Suite
          E-mail: jbs@severson.com
                  mks@severson.com
                  ek@severson.com
                  mck@severson.com

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE: Hoggard Loses Class Certification Bid
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as GLENDALE HOGGARD et al.,
v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, Case No. 1:17-cv-00099-TJK (D.D.C.),
the Hon. Judge Timothy J. Kelly entered an order as follows:

   1. denying the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification;

   2. denying as moot the Defendant's motion in limine to strike
      testimony and report of Arthur Olsen;

   3. remanding the action to the Superior Court of the District
      of Columbia; and

   4. directing the Clerk of Court to transfer all papers in
      these proceedings to the Superior Court of the District of
      Columbia.

Nationstar Mortgage LLC, doing business as Mr. Cooper, offers
mortgage services.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 30, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3eZFfBF at no extra charge.[CC]

NATWEST MARKETS: Manipulates Treasury Futures Contracts, Suit Says
------------------------------------------------------------------
ROCK CAPITAL MARKETS LLC and SYNOVA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, on behalf
of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v.
NATWEST MARKETS SECURITIES INC., NATWEST MARKETS PLC, NATWEST GROUP
PLC, and JOHN DOES 1-20, Defendants, Case No. 1:21-cv-06816 (N.D.
Ill., December 22, 2021) arises from the Defendants' unlawful and
intentional manipulation of U.S. Treasury futures contracts and
options on U.S. Treasury futures contracts, traded on United
States-based exchanges including the Chicago Board of Trade during
the period from at least January 1, 2008 through May 31, 2014, in
violation of the Commodity Exchange Act and the common law.

According to the complaint, the Defendants manipulated the prices
of Treasury Futures using a manipulative device known as
"spoofing." In other words, Defendants placed orders for Treasury
Futures with the intent, at the time the orders were placed, to
cancel those orders before they could be executed. By doing so, the
Defendants sent false and illegitimate supply and demand signals to
an otherwise efficient market. As a result, Defendants caused
Treasury Futures prices to be artificial throughout the Class
Period to benefit themselves financially, at the expense of other
investors, like Plaintiffs and the Class, says the suit.

The Plaintiffs transacted in Treasury Futures during the Class
Period, including purchases and sales of futures on the CBOT and
was injured and suffered losses from trading at artificial prices
proximately caused by Defendants' alleged unlawful manipulation.

NatWest Markets Securities Inc. is a Delaware corporation
headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut. NMSI is a U.S.
broker-dealer subsidiary of NatWest Markets and is registered with
the SEC as a broker-dealer and investment adviser.

NatWest Markets Plc is a public limited company under U.K. law and
is headquartered in Edinburgh, Scotland. NatWest Markets is the
investment banking arm of NatWest Group and was previously known as
The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Anthony F. Fata, Esq.
          Alexander J. Sweatman, Esq.
          CAFFERTY CLOBES MERIWETHER & SPRENGEL LLP
          150 S. Wacker, Suite 3000
          Chicago, IL 60606
          Telephone: (312) 782-4882
          E-mail: afata@caffertyclobes.com
                  asweatman@caffertyclobes.com

               - and -

          Vincent Briganti, Esq.
          Raymond P. Girnys, Esq.
          Johnathan P. Seredynski, Esq.
          Peter Demato, Esq.
          LOWEY DANNENBERG, P.C.
          44 South Broadway, Suite 1100
          White Plains, NY 10601
          Telephone: (914) 997-0500
          E-mail: vbriganti@lowey.com
                  rgirnys@lowey.com
                  jseredynski@lowey.com
                  pdemato@lowey.com

NEW YORK CITY, NY: Allen Suit Seeks to Certify Class
----------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as CLARENCE BOWEN ALLEN,
BRENDA BERMAN, ANNETTE BIRDSONG, WILLIAM HENRY, JOSE JACOB,
JACQUELINE KING, SUSAN LAMONICA, JEAN PHIPPS, ROSLYN PRESS, HERBERT
RICHARDSON, VIRGINIA TUFARO, on behalf of themselves and on behalf
of all other similarly situated individuals, v. THE CITY OF NEW
YORK and NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION, Case No.
1:19-cv-03786-JMF (S.D.N.Y.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter
an order:

   1. certifying a class pursuant to FRCP 23(b)(3);

   2. appointing Representative Plaintiffs Annette Birdsong and
      Herbert Richardson as Class Representatives; and

   3. appointing The Kurland Group as Class Counsel.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion to certify class dated Dec. 29,
2021 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3F6qXJX
at no extra charge.[CC]


NISSAN NORTH: Ayala Seeks to Certify Class
------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JOSE J. AYALA, JR. and
JEFF SANTOS, on behalf of themselves and as representatives of
other class members similarly situated, v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA,
INC. D/B/A NISSAN USA, a Delaware corporation, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Nissan Motor Company of Japan, Case No.
6:20-cv-01625-RBD-GJK (M.D. Fla.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to
enter an order:

   1. certifying a class with respect to Counts III-VI of the
      Amended Complaint;

   2. designating them as class representatives; and

   3. designating Eclat Law, LLP as class counsel.

The Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated, filed their First Amended Complaint ("FAC") against
Nissan for willful and systematic misconduct violating federal and
state laws—the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and the Florida
Minimum Wage Act ("FMWA"), amongst other causes of action.

The Plaintiffs and other putative class members were or currently
are Nissan automobile service employees who have worked at one or
more certified Nissan dealerships in Florida; these individuals
were or are subject to Nissan's unlawful compensation program
generally referred to as "piece-rate" or "flat-rate" for services
performed for Nissan.

Nissan North is a Delaware Corporation that manufactures and sells
Nissan vehicles.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion to certify class dated Dec. 31,
2021 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3Fd9fok
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Kevin K. Ross-Andino, Esq.
          Jolynn M. Falto, Esq.
          ECLAT LAW, LLP
          307 Cranes Roost Blvd., Suite 2010
          Altamonte Springs, FL 32701
          Telephone: (407) 636-7004
          Facsimile: (888) 413-0249
          E-mail: kevin.ross@eclatlaw.com
                  jfalto@eclatlaw.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Thomas R. Brice, Esq.
          50 North Laura Street, Suite 3300
          Jacksonville, FL 32202
          Telephone: (904) 798-2629
          Facsimile: (904) 360-6335
          E-mail: tbrice@mcguirewoods.com

               - and -

          Peter N. Farley, Esq.
          Christopher M. Michalik, Esq.
          Igor Babichenko, Esq.
          MCGUIREWOODS LLP
          Gateway Plaza 800 East Canal Street
          Richmond, VA 23219
          Telephone: (804) 775-1000
          Facsimile: (804) 775-1061
          E-mail: pfarley@mcguirewoods.com
                  cmichalik@mcguirewoods.com
                  ibabichenko@mcguirewoods.com

NORTHRUP GRUMMAN: Class Cert. Scheduling Order Entered in York Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as DON YORK, et al., v.
NORTHRUP GRUMMAN CORPORATION GUIDANCE AND ELECTRONICS COMPANY,
INC., et al., Case No. 21-03251-CV-S-BP (W.D. Mo.), the Hon. Judge
Beth Phillips Jr. entered a scheduling order Phase I regarding
class certification as follows:

   1. Discovery will proceed in two phases. The first phase will
      include discovery of all issues related to Plaintiff's
      motion for conditional certification. Phase II discovery
      will involve discovery relating to alleged damages and
      completion of any other merits issues.

   2. Any motion to join additional parties shall be filed on or
      before April 29, 2022. Any motion to amend the pleadings
      shall be filed on or before May 31, 2022.

   3. The Court will not entertain any discovery motion absent
      full compliance with Local Rule 37.1. Any discovery motion
      filed without complying with Local Rule 37.1 will be
      denied.

   4. The Plaintiffs shall designate their experts in support of
      the motion for class certification by October 3, 2022.
      The Defendants shall designate their experts in opposition
      to the motion for class certification by November 7, 2022.
      The Plaintiffs shall designate rebuttal experts for class
      certification by December 5, 2022.

   5. The Plaintiff's motion for conditional certification of a
      collective and/or class action shall be filed on or before
      December 5, 2022. The Defendant's response to plaintiff's
      motion to certify a class shall be on or before April 14,
      2023. The Plaintiff's reply shall be due on or before July
      31, 2023.

Northrop produces electronic systems.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 22, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3pQ3hoL at no extra charge.[CC]


NUTRITION CORP: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Nutrition Corp, Inc.
The case is styled as Robert Weekes, individually, and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. Nutrition Corp, Inc., Case No.
1:21-cv-11158 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Nutrition Corp, Inc. doing business as Fresh n' Lean --
https://www.freshnlean.com/ -- prepares and delivers
organically-sourced, gluten-free, and fresh meals directly to your
door, nationwide.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Edward Y. Kroub, Esq.
          MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
          200 Vesey Street, Ste. 24th Floor
          New York, NY 10281
          Phone: (212) 595-6200
          Email: ekroub@mizrahikroub.com


OMNI HOTELS: Scheduling Order Entered in Beaver Class Action
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as DEAN BEAVER, et al., v.
OMNI HOTELS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, et al., Case No.
3:20-cv-00191-AJB-DEB (S.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Daniel E. Butcher
entered a scheduling order regulating discovery and class
certification motion filing deadline:

   1. A telephonic Case Management Conference to discuss the
      status of the case and discovery will be held on April 22,
      2022 at 10:00 a.m.

   2. Fact and class discovery are not bifurcated; however, all
      discovery for Plaintiff's motion for class certification
      must be completed on or before May 6, 2022.

   3. A motion for class certification must be filed on or
      before June 6, 2022.

   4. Counsel must contact the Court's chambers regarding
      setting all remaining case management dates within three
      days of the Court's ruling on the motion for class
      certification.

Omni Hotels is an American privately held, international luxury
hotel company based in Dallas, Texas.

A copy of the Court's order dated Jan. 4, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3q6biGg at no extra charge.[CC]


ONE SOURCE: Faces Wright Suit Over Inaccurate Consumer Reports
--------------------------------------------------------------
SHARON DEKONTEE WRIGHT, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ONE SOURCE TECHNOLOGY, LLC D/B/A
ASURINT, Defendant, Case No. 27-CV-21-15514 (Minn. Dist. Ct.,
Hennepin Cty., December 27, 2021) is a class action against the
Defendant for violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

The case arises from the Defendant's alleged failure to follow
reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the
information included in its consumer reports. The Defendant falsely
reported to the Plaintiff's healthcare employer that (1) the
Plaintiff's identity, including her social security number (SSN)
could not be verified; (2) she was the subject of
healthcare-related sanctions; and (3) she was a participant in a
multi-million dollar fraud. As a result of the Defendant's false
report, the Plaintiff was taken off her job.

One Source Technology, LLC, doing business as Asurint, is a
consumer reporting agency headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:          
         
         E. Michelle Drake, Esq.
         John G. Albanese, Esq.
         Ariana B. Kiener, Esq.
         BERGER MONTAGUE PC
         1229 Tyler Street NE, Suite 205
         Minneapolis, MN 55413
         Telephone: (612) 594-5999
         Facsimile: (612) 584-4470
         E-mail: emdrake@bm.net
                 jalbanese@bm.net
                 akiener@bm.net

OSCAR MIKE: Fails to Properly Pay Diesel Mechanics, Tucker Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MICHAEL TUCKER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. OSCAR MIKE INCORPORATED, Defendant, Case No.
2:21-cv-01706-AKK (N.D. Ala., December 27, 2021) is a class action
against the Defendant for its failure to compensate the Plaintiff
and similarly situated diesel mechanics overtime pay for all hours
worked in excess of 40 hours in a workweek in violation of the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant as a diesel mechanic
from September 2020 until December 2021.

Oscar Mike Incorporated is a provider of contract line haul
services, with its principal place of business in Irondale,
Alabama. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:          
         
         Courtney Lowery, Esq.
         SANFORD LAW FIRM, PLLC
         Kirkpatrick Plaza
         10800 Financial Centre Pkwy., Suite 510
         Little Rock, AR 72211
         Telephone: (501) 221-0088
         Facsimile: (888) 787-2040
         E-mail: courtney@sanfordlawfirm.com

PELOTON INTERACTIVE: Rosen Law Firm Reminds of Jan. 18 Deadline
---------------------------------------------------------------
WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds
purchasers of the securities of Peloton Interactive, Inc. (NASDAQ:
PTON) between December 9, 2020 and November 4, 2021, inclusive (the
"Class Period"), of the important January 18, 2022 lead plaintiff
deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Peloton securities during the Class
Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any
out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Peloton class action, go to
http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2204.htmlor call Phillip
Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or
cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action. A class
action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead
plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than January 18, 2022.
A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of
other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel
with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms
issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources or any
meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually
litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel.
The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe,
concentrating its practice in securities class actions and
shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the
largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese
Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class
Action Services for number of securities class action settlements
in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013
and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In
2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In
2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a
Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been
recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants
repeatedly and falsely assured investors that Peloton's positive
results and growth would continue after the pandemic. In addition,
during the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading
statements about the amount of inventory that Peloton held, and
touted the Company's ability to keep its inventory levels in line
with substantial, sustained demand. As a result of defendants'
misrepresentations, Peloton common stock traded at artificially
inflated prices during the Class Period. When the true details
entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered
damages.

To join the Peloton class action, go to
http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2204.htmlor call Phillip
Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or
cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are
not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select
counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member
and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any
potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead
plaintiff.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar
outcome.

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
lrosen@rosenlegal.com
pkim@rosenlegal.com
cases@rosenlegal.com
www.rosenlegal.com [GN]


PHOENIX MANAGEMENT: Debt Collection Letter "Deceptive," Bhogte Says
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DEVDATTA BHOGTE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. PHOENIX MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., and
MAJESTIC GARDENS CONDOMINIUM C ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendants, Case
No. 0:21-cv-62564 (S.D. Fla., December 26, 2021) is a class action
against the Defendants for violation of the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act.

The case arises from Defendant Phoenix Management's collection of
debt from the Plaintiff without a valid consumer collection agency
license. Moreover, Defendant Phoenix Management's debt collection
letter allegedly failed to provide necessary information and
disclosures required by Sec. 1692e(11) of the FDCPA.

Phoenix Management Services, Inc. is a property management company,
with its principal place of business located in Lauderdale Lakes,
Florida.

Majestic Gardens Condominium C Association, Inc. is a condominium
association, with its principal place of business located in
Lauderhill, Florida. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                                   
                                  
         
         Jibrael S. Hindi, Esq.
         Thomas J. Patti, Esq.
         THE LAW OFFICES OF JIBRAEL S. HINDI
         110 SE 6th Street, Suite 1744
         Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
         Telephone: (954) 907-1136
         Facsimile: (855) 529-9540
         E-mail: jibrael@jibraellaw.com
                 tom@jibraellaw.com

PLAYTIKA HOLDING: Rosen Law Firm Reminds of January 24 Deadline
---------------------------------------------------------------
WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds
purchasers of the securities of Playtika Holding Corp. (NASDAQ:
PLTK): (1) pursuant and/or traceable to Playtika's initial public
offering conducted on or about January 15, 2021 (the "IPO" or
"Offering"); and/or (2) between January 15, 2021 and November 2,
2021, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important January 24,
2022 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Playtika securities you may be entitled
to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs
through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Playtika class action, go to
http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2218.htmlor call Phillip
Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or
cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action. A class
action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead
plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than January 24, 2022.
A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of
other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel
with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms
issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources or any
meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually
litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel.
The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe,
concentrating its practice in securities class actions and
shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the
largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese
Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class
Action Services for number of securities class action settlements
in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013
and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In
2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In
2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a
Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been
recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, the Offering
documents issued in connection with the Company's IPO were
negligently prepared and, as a result, contained untrue statements
of material fact or omitted to state other facts necessary to make
the statements made not misleading and were not prepared in
accordance with the rules and regulations governing their
preparation. Additionally, defendants throughout the Class Period
made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose
that: (1) Playtika's year-over-year total costs and costs related
to sales & marketing and research & development were on track to
rise significantly by the third quarter of 2021; (2) the success of
Playtika's game portfolio was less sustainable than the Company had
represented; (3) the foregoing issues were likely to negatively
impact Playtika's revenue and earnings; and (4) as a result,
defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading
at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market,
the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Playtika class action, go to
http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2218.htmlor call Phillip
Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or
cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are
not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select
counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member
and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any
potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead
plaintiff.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar
outcome.

Contact Information:

      Laurence Rosen, Esq.
      Phillip Kim, Esq.
      The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
      275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
      New York, NY 10016
      Tel: (212) 686-1060
      Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
      Fax: (212) 202-3827
      lrosen@rosenlegal.com
      pkim@rosenlegal.com
      cases@rosenlegal.com
      www.rosenlegal.com [GN]

PLURIS WEDGEFIELD: Kohl Must File Reply to Opposition by Jan. 18
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Kohl, et al., v. Pluris
Wedgefield, LLC, et al., Case No. 6:20-cv-01683 (M.D. Fla.), the
Hon. Judge Gregory J Kelly entered an endorsed order granting
unopposed motion to extend time to file reply to defendants'
opposition to class certification.

The Plaintiffs must file their reply to Defendants' Opposition to
Class Certification by Jan. 18, 2022.

The nature of suit states Torts -- Personal Property -- Other
Personal Property Damage.[CC]

PROTECTIVE ENTERPRISES: Oneal Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages Under FLSA
----------------------------------------------------------------
Quantisha Oneal and other similarly situated individuals v.
Protective Enterprises Public Safety, LLC, and Marcus D. Williams,
individually, Case No. 3:22-cv-00010-MMH-MCR (M.D. Fla., Jan. 4,
2022) is an action to recover money damages for unpaid regular
wages and retaliation under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Plaintiff and all other current and former employees worked
more than 40 hours during one or more weeks on or after September
2020, without being adequately compensated.

Protective Enterprises provides security and surveillance services
to residential and commercial accounts, where Plaintiff worked for
Defendant.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Zandro E. Palma, Esq.
          ZANDRO E. PALMA, P.A.
          9100 S. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 1500
          Miami, FL 33156
          Telephone: (305) 446-1500
          Facsimile: (305) 446-1502
          E-mail: zep@thepalmalawgroup.com

PURE ROMANCE: Contreras Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
-------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Pure Romance, LLC.
The case is styled as Yensy Contreras, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated v. Pure Romance, LLC, Case No.
1:21-cv-11204 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Pure Romance -- https://www.pureromance.com/ -- has been the source
for relationship enhancement, beauty care, lubes, and sex toys for
over 25 years.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jarrett Scott Charo, Esq.
          MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
          200 Vesey Street, Ste. 24th Floor
          New York, NY 10281
          Phone: (212) 595-6200
          Email: jcharo@mizrahikroub.com


REATA PHARMACEUTICALS: Rosen Law Firm Reminds of Feb. 18 Deadline
-----------------------------------------------------------------
WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds
purchasers of the securities of Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(NASDAQ: RETA) between November 9, 2020 and December 8, 2021,
inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important February 18,
2022lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Reata Pharmaceuticals securities during
the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without
payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency
fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Reata Pharmaceuticals class action, go
to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2230.htmlor call
Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email
pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the
class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you
wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later
than February 18, 2022. A lead plaintiff is a representative party
acting on behalf of other class members in directing the
litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel
with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms
issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or
any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not
actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting
counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the
globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and
shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the
largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese
Company. Rosen Law Firm was ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class
Action Services for number of securities class action settlements
in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013
and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In
2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In
2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a
Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been
recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the complaint, defendants
throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements
and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the FDA had raised concerns
regarding the validity of the clinical study designed to measure
the efficacy and safety of bardoxolone for the treatment of chronic
kidney disease caused by Alport syndrome; (2) as a result, there
was a material risk that Reata's New Drug Application would not be
approved; and (3) as a result of the foregoing, defendants'
positive statements about Reata's business, operations, and
prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable
basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims
that investors suffered damages.

To join the Reata Pharmaceuticals class action, go to
http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2230.htmlor call Phillip
Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or
cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are
not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select
counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member
and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any
potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead
plaintiff.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar
outcome.

CONTACT:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
lrosen@rosenlegal.com
cases@rosenlegal.com
pkim@rosenlegal.com
www.rosenlegal.com [GN]

SAMS WEST: Court Narrows Claims in Sanchez Class Suit
-----------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Carlos Sanchez v. Sams
West, Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-05122-SVW-JC (C.D. Cal.), the Hon.
Judge Stephen V. Wilson entered an order granting in part and
denying in part the Defendant's motion to dismiss ,as follows:

   -- The motion is granted as to Plaintiffs second cause of
      action, which is dismissed with prejudice, the Plaintiff's
      fifth cause of action, which is dismissed without
      prejudice.

   -- The motion is denied in all other respects. The Plaintiff
      is ordered to move for class certification within 60 days.

Sam's West is an American chain of membership-only retail warehouse
clubs owned and operated by Walmart Inc., founded in 1983 and named
after Walmart founder Sam Walton.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 23, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3JDHdFK at no extra charge.[CC]

SELLO LLC: Weekes Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
-------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Sello, LLC. The case
is styled as Robert Weekes, individually, and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. Sello, LLC, Case No. 1:21-cv-11163
(S.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Sello -- https://selloproducts.com/ -- is an innovative wine
preservation system that utilizes active packaging technology to
keep wine tasting great by regulating oxygen and moisture
levels.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Edward Y. Kroub, Esq.
          MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
          200 Vesey Street, Ste. 24th Floor
          New York, NY 10281
          Phone: (212) 595-6200
          Email: ekroub@mizrahikroub.com


SPECIALIZED LOAN: Wins Summary Judgment Bid vs Mitchell
-------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Eric T. Mitchell v.
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, et al.,Case No. 2:20-cv-10455-SB-PD
(C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. entered an
order:

   1. granting the Defendant's motion for summary judgment;

   2. dismissing on the merits with prejudice the Plaintiff's
      claims; and

   3. denying as moot Plaintiff's motion for class
      certification.

Specialized Loan operates as a financial company.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 27, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/331Hq4X at no extra charge.[CC]

ST. LOUIS, MO: Cody Loses Class Certification Bid
-------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JAMES CODY, et al., v.
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Case No. 4:17-cv-02707-AGF (E.D. Mo.), the Hon.
Judge Audrey G. Fleissig entered an order denying the Plaintiffs'
motion for class certification.

The Court further ordered that:

   -- Any motion by Plaintiffs John Doe and John Roe for leave
      to proceed anonymously or to amend the complaint to
      reflect their true identifies must be filed within 14 days
      of the date of this Memorandum and Order.

   -- pro se Plaintiff Vincent Grover shall show cause in
      writing within 14 days of the date of this Memorandum and
      Order why his individual claims should not be dismissed
      without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

   -- Failure to comply will result in this dismissal of his
      claims only without prejudice.

   -- The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Order to
      Plaintiff Vincent Grover at the address reflected in the
      file.

The named plaintiffs in this putative class action claim that they
endured inhumane conditions, in violation of the Eighth and
Fourteenth Amendments, while detained either pretrial or
post-conviction in the City of St. Louis's Medium Security
Institution (MSI) at various points from January to October of
2017.

They filed suit against the City under 42 U.S.C. seeking 1983,
seeking class action certification, monetary damages, declaratory
relief, and injunctive relief. The Court previously granted the
City’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' claims for
declaratory and injunctive relief, and the Court dismissed those
claims without prejudice for lack of standing. Thus, the only
claims that remain are those for monetary damages.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 27, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at at no extra charge.[CC]

T-MOBILE USA: Wellman Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri
-------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Richard Wellman, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. T-Mobile USA Inc., Case No.
2:21-cv-01250, was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Washington, to the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Missouri on Dec. 21, 2021.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 4:21-cv-00918-BCW to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud.

T-Mobile US, Inc. -- https://www.t-mobile.com/ -- is an American
wireless network operator partly owned by German telecommunications
company Deutsche Telekom, which has a 43.2% share.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Roger M. Townsend, Esq.
          BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND PLLC
          1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3670
          Seattle, WA 98104
          Phone: (206) 652-8660
          Fax: (206) 652-8290
          Email: rtownsend@bjtlegal.com


TD AMERITRADE: Must Respond to Renewed Class Cert Bid by Feb. 14
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Klein v. TD Ameritrade
Holding Corporation, et al., Case No. 8:14-cv-00396 (D. Neb.), the
Hon. Judge Susan M. Bazis entered an order granting motion to
extend.

The Defendants shall respond to the renewed motion for class
certification, appointment of class representative, and appointment
of class counsel by February 14, 2022, says Judge Bazis.

The suit alleges violation of the Securities Exchange Act.

TD Ameritrade is a broker that offers an electronic trading
platform for the trade of financial assets including common stocks,
preferred stocks, futures contracts, exchange-traded funds, forex,
options, cryptocurrency, mutual funds, fixed income investments,
margin lending, and cash management services.[CC]

TDB COMMUNICATIONS: Ramos Labor Suit Goes to E.D. California
------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled IRENE RAMOS, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. TDB COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; GAINWELL
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; DOES 1 through 220, inclusive, Case No.
34-2021-00311054, was removed from the Superior Court of the State
of California, County of Sacramento, to the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of California on December 27, 2021.

The Clerk of Court for the Eastern District of California assigned
Case No. 2:21-cv-02408-MCE-AC to the proceeding.

The case arises from the Defendants' alleged disability
discrimination, failure to accommodate, failure to engage in the
interactive process, and wrongful termination.

TDB Communications, Inc. is an employment services provider, with
its corporate headquarters located in Washington D.C.

Gainwell Technologies, LLC is a provider of technology solutions,
headquartered in Conway, Arizona. [BN]

The Defendant is represented by:          
         
         Heather D. Hearne, Esq.
         THE KULLMAN FIRM, PLC
         4605 Bluebonnet Blvd., Suite A
         Baton Rouge, LA 70809
         Telephone: (225) 906-4243
         Facsimile: (225) 906-4230
         E-mail: hdh@kullmanlaw.com

THRIVING BRANDS: Antiperspirants Contain Benzene, Soldevilla Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DIANNE SOLDEVILLA, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. THRIVING BRANDS LLC and HENKEL
CORPORATION, Defendants, Case No. 0:21-cv-62573 (S.D. Fla.,
December 28, 2021) is a class action against the Defendants for
unjust enrichment, negligent misrepresentation/omission, breach of
express warranty, breach of implied warranty, strict product
liability, and violations of Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade
Practices Act.

According to the complaint, the Defendants are engaged in false,
deceptive, and misleading advertising, labeling, and marketing of
aerosol antiperspirant products under the brand name Right Guard.
The Defendants failed to include labeling indicating to consumers
that their aerosol antiperspirant products contain benzene at
levels that are potentially dangerous to human health when used as
directed. Had the Plaintiff and Class members known that any of the
aerosol antiperspirant products were contaminated with benzene at
levels that are potentially harmful, they would not have purchased
any of the Defendants' products, says the suit.

Thriving Brands LLC is a consumer goods manufacturer, with its
principal place of business at 8170 Corporate Part Drive, Suite
143, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Henkel Corporation is a consumer goods manufacturer, with its
principal place of business at 1 Henkel Way, Rocky Hill,
Connecticut. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                                   
                                  
         
         R. Jason Richards, Esq.
         Bryan F. Aylstock, Esq.
         AYLSTOCK, WITKIN, KREIS & OVERHOLTZ, PLLC
         17 East Main Street, Suite 200
         Pensacola, FL 32502
         Telephone: (850) 202-1010
         Facsimile: (850) 916-7449
         E-mail: jrichards@awkolaw.com
                 baylstock@awkolaw.com

TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS: Debt Collection Letter "Deceptive," Sprei Says
------------------------------------------------------------------
ESTHER SPREI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INC., Defendant, Case No.
1:21-cv-07115-BMC (E.D.N.Y., December 27, 2021) is a class action
against the Defendant for violations of the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act.

According to the complaint, the Defendant sent a deceptive and
misleading debt collection letter to the Plaintiff concerning her
alleged debt. The Defendant's letter is deceptive and misleading
because it: (1) fails to specify that the Defendant's client is the
alleged creditor or to identify the Defendant's client as the
current creditor; (2) fails to provide any explanation as to for
what purposes the Plaintiff should contact the alleged creditor at
the telephone number provided; (3) fails to explain that the
Plaintiff may waive some rights depending on the method in which
she disputes the debt; and (4) fails to meet statutory obligation
by sending the letter to the Plaintiff with three separate
addresses and two separate telephone numbers. As a result, the
Plaintiff was confused as to how to properly dispute the debt and
exercise her rights, says the suit.

Transworld Systems Inc. is a debt collection agency based in New
York, New York. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:          
         
         Raphael Deutsch, Esq.
         STEIN SAKS, PLLC
         1 University Plaza, Suite 620
         Hackensack, NJ 07601
         Telephone: (201) 282-6500
         Facsimile: (201) 282-6501
         E-mail: rdeutsch@steinsakslegal.com

UNILEVER UNITED: Continuance of Class Cert. Filing Sought
---------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as NICOLE KRAUSE-PETTAI,
SCOTT GRIMM, STEVE TABU LANIER, CHRISTY STEVENS, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. UNILEVER UNITED
STATES, INC., a corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Case No.
3:20-cv-01672-DMS-BLM (S.D. Cal.), the Parties ask the Court to
enter an order granting their joint motion for continuance of the
plaintiffs' deadline to file motion for class certification.

The Parties also jointly request that the Court modify various
deadlines set by the Court's June 3, 2021 Scheduling Order
Regulating Discovery and Other Pre-Trial Proceeding and vacate the
January 24, 2022 Mandatory Settlement Conference pending the
completion of private mediation.

The Plaintiffs filed this action in the Southern District on August
26, 2020, followed by a First Amended Complaint on December 2,
2020. The Court granted in part and denied in part the Defendant's
Motion to Dismiss on April 23, 2021. The Plaintiffs filed their
Second Amended Complaint on May 6, 2021.

A copy of the Parties' motion dated Dec. 23, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/34dRSXr at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq.
          Joel M. Gordon, Esq.
          MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP
          29800 Agoura Road, Suite 210
          Agoura Hills, CA 91301
          Telephone: (818) 991-8080
          Facsimile: (818) 991-8081
          E-mail: ssaltzman@marlinsaltzman.com
                  jgordon@marlinsaltzman.com

UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS: Filing of Class Cert. Bid Extended to March 10
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as DONTE FAINE, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. UNIVERSAL
LOGISTICS OF VIRGINIA, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company
doing business as Estes Express Lines, Case No.
1:21-cv-00524-PAB-KLM (D. Colo.), the Hon. Judge Kristen L. Mix
entered an order extending the deadline for Plaintiff to file a
motion for class certification to March 10, 2022.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 29, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3t17sjy at no extra charge.[CC]

VOYAGER DIGITAL: Cassidy Sues Over Cryptocurrency Misrepresentation
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MARK CASSIDY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. VOYAGER DIGITAL LTD and VOYAGER DIGITAL LLC,
Defendants, Case No. 1:21-cv-24441 (S.D. Fla., December 24, 2021)
is a class action against the Defendants for unjust enrichment and
violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the Florida
Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

The case arises from the Defendants' alleged false pretenses and
misrepresentations of Voyager's mobile application cryptocurrency
investment service. The Defendants represented Voyager's
cryptocurrency trading services as 100% commission free to unfairly
obtain an edge over their competition. In reality and unbeknownst
to the Defendants' consumers, the Defendants collect exorbitant
hidden commissions on every cryptocurrency trade, says the suit.

Voyager Digital Ltd. is an operator of a mobile application
cryptocurrency investment service, with a principal place of
business in 33 Irving Place, 3rd Floor, New York, New York.

Voyager Digital LLC is an operator of a mobile application
cryptocurrency investment service, with its principal place of
business in Jersey City, New Jersey. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:          
         
         Adam M. Moskowitz, Esq.
         Joseph M. Kaye, Esq.
         THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC
         2 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 601
         Coral Gables, FL 33134
         Telephone: (305) 740-1423
         E-mail: adam@moskowitz-law.com
                 joseph@moskowitz-law.com

                  - and –

         Stuart Z. Grossman, Esq.
         Rachel W. Furst, Esq.
         GROSSMAN ROTH YAFFA COHEN, P.A.
         2525 Ponce de Leon Blvd Ste 1150
         Coral Gables, FL 33134
         Telephone: (305) 442-8666
         E-mail: szg@grossmanroth.com
                 rwf@grossmanroth.com

WALMART INC: Filing of Class Status Bid Due July 15
---------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as McCoy v. Walmart, Inc. et
al., Case No. 6:18-cv-03256 (W.D. Mo.), the Hon. Judge Beth
Phillips entered an order extending the deadlines for expert
disclosures and class certification motions by 90 days as follows:

  -- The Plaintiffs shall disclose class experts by April 21,
     2022.

  -- The Defendant shall disclose class experts by May 23, 2022.

  -- The deadline to file a motion for class certification is
     July 15, 2022.

  -- The deadline for suggestions in opposition is August 19,
     2022.

  -- The deadline for reply suggestions is September 6, 2022.

  -- All other deadlines in the Amended Scheduling Order, remain
     in place including the dispositive motion deadline of
     December 20, 2022 and the trial setting of May 15, 2023.

The nature suit Diversity -- Other Contract.

Walmart is an American multinational retail corporation that
operates a chain of hypermarkets, discount department stores, and
grocery stores from the United States, headquartered in
Bentonville, Arkansas.[CC]

WALMART INC: Moreland Sues Over Product's "Non-Drowsy" Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Moreland, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Walmart Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-02002-CSB-E
(C.D. Ill., Jan. 4, 2022) alleges that the Defendant promotes
Equate brand products as "Non-Drowsy."

The Plaintiff contends that the Defendant misleads consumers who
expect they are purchasing a cold and flu product that  will not
make them drowsy or increase the chances they become drowsy.
Consumers want to take over-the-counter drug products that help
them feel better, but also allow them to be active, either for work
or they desire to maintain control of their senses. Though the
Product is represented as "Non-Drowsy," it contains
dextromethorphan hydrobromide, which is well-known for causing
drowsiness, says the suit.

Dextromethorphan hydrobromide is an approved active ingredient for
oral antitussives.

Though the Drug Facts on the back of the Product do not require
disclosure about dextromethorphan hydrobromide's connection to
drowsiness, Defendant is still required to refrain from statements
that may be half-truths, or false, the suit added.

Walmart manufactures, labels, markets, and sells antitussive drug
products intended to treat colds and flu promoted as "Non-Drowsy"
under its Equate brand.

Defendant sold more of the Product and at higher prices than it
would have in the absence of this misconduct, resulting in
additional profits at the expense of consumers. Had Plaintiff and
proposed class members known the truth, they would not have bought
the Product or would have paid less for it, alleges the suit.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Spencer Sheehan, Esq.
          SHEEHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
          60 Cuttermill Rd Ste 409
          Great Neck NY 11021
          Telephone: (516) 268-7080
          E-mail: spencer@spencersheehan.com

WAN HAO: Tung Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages for Restaurant Staff
------------------------------------------------------------------
PATRICK TUNG and VANESSA LI, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. WAN HAO RESTAURANT, INC.
d/b/a The Real KTV d/b/a Royal Queen, CONNIE YING ZHANG, and HOWARD
LEE, Defendants, Case No. 1:21-cv-07137 (E.D.N.Y., December 28,
2021) is a class action against the Defendants for unpaid overtime
wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York
Labor Law.

Plaintiffs Tung and Li were employed by the Defendants as a waiter
and cashier, respectively, at their restaurant located at 136-20
Roosevelt Avenue, Floor 3, Flushing, New York from October 2018
until September 2021.

Wan Hao Restaurant Inc., doing business as Royal Queen and the Real
KTV, is a restaurant owner and operator, with a principal address
at 136-20 Roosevelt Avenue, 3rd Floor, Flushing, New York. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:                                 
                                    
         
         John Troy, Esq.
         Aaron Schweitzer, Esq.
         Tiffany Troy, Esq.
         TROY LAW, PLLC
         41-25 Kissena Boulevard Suite 103
         Flushing, NY 11355
         Telephone: (718) 762-1324

WISCONSIN: Bid to Certify Rule 23 Class Due July 8
--------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as BRIAN BEMKE, et al., v.
AMY PECHACEK, in her official capacity as Secretary-designee of the
State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, Case No.
3:21-cv-00560-wmc (W.D. Wisc.), the Hon. Judge Stephen L. Crocker
entered a preliminary pretrial conference order as follows:

  -- Amendments to Pleadings due:            Feb. 25, 2022

  -- Motion to Certify Class under           July 8, 2022
     Rule 23 due:

  -- Dispositive Motions due:                Oct. 24, 2022

  -- Settlement Letters due:                 March 31, 2023

  -- Motions in Limine due:                  April 7, 2023

  -- Responses due:                          March 21, 2023

  -- Final Pretrial Conference set for:      May 2, 2023

  -- Jury Selection and Trial set for:       May 15, 2023

The Department's primary responsibilities include providing job
services, training and employment assistance to people looking for
work.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 27, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/32ZIndS at no extra charge.[CC]

XPO LAST: Joint Bid to Amend Class Cert Briefing Schedule Filed
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as LEON GREEN and WALDO
TEJADA, on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. XPO LAST
MILE, INC., Case No. 3:19-cv-01896-JAM (D. Conn.), the Parties ask
the Court to enter an order adjusting the class certification
briefing deadlines as follows:

  a. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class           January 24, 2022
     Certification will be due on
     or before:

  b. XPO LM's opposition will be            March 7, 2022
     due on or before:

  c. Plaintiffs' Reply will be              March 28, 2022
     due on or before:

On November 12, 2021, the Court entered an order setting the
deadline for Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification on January
2, 2022, XPO's LM's opposition on February 14, 2022, and
Plaintiffs' Reply on March 11, 2022.

The Parties have discovered that a data file reflecting the
deliveries made by putative class members originally produced by
Defendants was corrupted and incomplete. The Defendants replaced,
and Plaintiffs received the replacement file this week and are
analyzing it in preparation for filing their Motion for Class
Certification.

XPO Last Mile, Inc. provides third-party logistics and last mile
delivery services.

A copy of the Parties motion dated Dec. 29, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3n0I6P1 at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Zachary L. Rubin, Esq.
          Harold L. Lichten, Esq.
          Benjamin J. Weber, Esq.
          Olena Savytska, Esq.
          LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
          729 Boylston St., Suite 2000
          Boston, MA 02116
          Telephone: (617) 994-5800
          E-mail: hlichten@llrlaw.com
                  bjweber@llrlaw.com
                  OSavytska@llrlaw.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          David R. Golder, Esq.
          Carolyn A. Trotta, Esq.
          JACKSON LEWIS, P.C.
          90 Statehouse Square, 8th Floor
          Hartford, CT 06103
          Telephone: (860) 522-0404
          Facsimile: (860) 247-1330
          E-mail: David.Golder@jacksonlewis.com
                  Carolyn.Trotta@jacksonlewis.com

               - and -

          Adam L. Lounsbury, Esq.
          JACKSON LEWIS, P.C.
          701 E. Byrd Street, 17th Floor
          Richmond, VA 23219
          Telephone: (804) 649-0404
          Facsimile: (804) 649-0403
          E-mail: Adam.Lounsbury@jacksonlewis.com

               - and -

          Juan C. Obregon, Esq.
          JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
          950 17th Street, Suite 2600
          Denver, CO 80202
          Telephone: (303) 892-0404
          Facsimile: (303) 892-5575
          E-mail: juan.obregon@jacksonlewis.com

ZOOSK INC: Ct. Amends Class Cert. Briefing Dates in Flores-Mendez
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JUAN FLORES-MENDEZ, an
individual and AMBER COLLINS, an individual, and on behalf of
classes of similarly situated individuals, v. ZOOSK, INC., a
Delaware corporation, Case No. 3:20-cv-04929-WHA (N.D. Cal.), the
Hon. Judge William Alsup entered an order that:

   1. The Defendant's response to Plaintiffs' motion for class
      certification is due February 21, 2022;

   2. The Plaintiffs' reply to Defendant's response to
      Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is due February
      28, 2022; and

   3. All other scheduled dates and deadlines in this matter
      shall remain as currently provided by the Court's prior
      Orders.

Zoosk is an online dating service available in 25 languages and in
more than 80 countries.

A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 22, 2021 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3sRkYWY at no extra charge.[CC]

[*] Squire Patton Attorneys Provide 2021 CCPA Litigation Review
---------------------------------------------------------------
Rafael M. Langer-Osuna, Esq., Marisol C. Mork, Esq., Kristin L.
Bryan, Esq., and Marissa Black, Esq., of Squire Patton Boggs LLP,
in an article for Mondaq, report that 2021 was another record
setting year for the California Consumer Privacy Act ("CCPA"). Read
on for CPW's highlights of the year's most significant events
concerning CCPA litigation, as well as our predictions for what
2022 may bring.

2020 Recap: The CCPA Comes Into Effect
The CCPA went into effect on January 1, 2020. It regulates any
"business" that "does business in California," even those without a
physical presence in the state, and determines the means and
purposes of the processing of "personal information".

As a recap, what entities qualify as a "business" subject to the
CCPA? The statute defines a "business" as a for-profit, private
entity that (1) collects "personal information", (2) determines the
means of processing that personal information, (3) does business in
California, and (4) meets one of the following criteria:

Has annual gross revenues exceeding $25 million;
Annually sells/buys or receives/shares for commercial purposes the
personal information of 50,000 or more California consumers; or
Derives 50% or more of its annual revenue from selling personal
information.

Generally, the CCPA covers all information so long as it relates to
a California resident or California household. Aligning with the
GDPR, the CCPA defines "personal information" to include
"information that identifies, relates to, describes, is reasonably
capable of being associated with, or could reasonably be linked,
directly or indirectly, with a particular consumer or household."
Cal. Civ. Code Sec. 1798.140(o).

The CCPA requires compliance with its notification and transparency
notices. First, the CCPA expects businesses to present up to four
notices, to be determined by that business's practices. Second,
businesses must also inform consumers of their rights under the
CCPA including their: (1) right to know, (2) right to delete, (3)
right to opt out, (4) right to not be discriminated against for
exercising their CCPA rights.

Section 1798.150(a)(1) of the CCPA provides a private right of
action to "[a]ny consumer whose nonencrypted and nonredacted
personal information . . . is subject to an unauthorized access and
exfiltration, theft, or disclosure" due to a business failing to
satisfy "the duty to implement and maintain reasonable security
procedures and practices . . . ." (emphasis supplied). Damages
available for a private right of action under Section
1798.150(a)(1) include a statutory amount of between $100 and $750
"per consumer per incident or actual damages, whichever is
greater", as well as injunctive or declaratory relief and "any
other relief the court deems proper" (emphasis supplied).

The first CCPA lawsuit, Fuentes v. Sunshine Behavioral Health
Group, LLC, No. 8:20-cv-00487 (C.D. Cal.), appeared on March 10,
2020, only three months after the law went into effect. Others soon
followed.

Overview of 2021 CCPA Litigations: What Do the Numbers Show?
To date, over 125 cases asserting CCPA claims have been filed this
year, with the vast majority (91.2%) filed in federal courts. Each
quarter of 2021 has seen roughly the same number of cases filed
(about 30-35 cases). Not surprisingly, about 60% of all federal
cases were filed in California's federal courts, with the largest
number of cases filed in the Northern and Southern Districts of
California. Outside of California, the Western District of
Washington had the largest number of CCPA cases filed with ten
total cases filed to date. A handful of cases have also been filed
in district courts in each of the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth,
Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits. Ten of the eleven
state court cases filed have been filed in California Superior
Courts.

Interestingly, nearly 40% of all CCPA cases filed this year either
concerned the T-Mobile data event or alternatively, another data
event involving a financial services company following account
hacks on the California Employment Development Department's ("EDD")
prepaid debit cards. As such, the largest number of cases filed
this year were concentrated in the communications and financial
services industries. The remaining CCPA cases, however, span a wide
range of industries—including technology, healthcare, insurance,
and hospitality. Even a hair transplant company had a CCPA lawsuit
brought against it this year.

And while cyber theft remains on the rise, plaintiffs (and
plaintiffs' attorneys) have not lost sight of other data use
implications mandated by the CCPA. For example, Flo Health Inc., an
ovulation-tracking app has been hit with a number of class action
lawsuits alleging the app "secretly collected" (i.e. without
consent) personal information of users—including whether women
were trying to get pregnant—and shared that data with third-party
data collectors and advertisers. The lawsuits follow the FTC's
investigation into related concerns. Some of the complaints against
Flo Health reference the CCPA as supporting other claims raised by
plaintiffs, such as violation of the California's Unfair
Competition Law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code Sections 17200, et seq.),
without asserting a direct CCPA claim.

2021 Developments in CCPA Case Law
This year has seen a number of developments in CCPA litigation case
law. We highlight a few of those developments here.

At the beginning of this year, one federal court held that the CCPA
does not limit the scope of discovery in litigation. Will Kaupelis
v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., Case No. 19-01203 (C.D. Cal.).
This case was brought as a putative class action and concerned
claims that the defendant allegedly manufactured and sold chainsaws
with a design defect. After defendant's motion to dismiss was
denied, plaintiff sought discovery that included the PI of
customers who had complained about the purported product defect
(including individuals in California). The defendant resisted
production of this information, in reliance on the CCPA.
Specifically, the defendant argued that the CCPA expanded the
privacy rights previously provided under California law. As such,
the defendant argued that the court should "protect the consumers'
PI by allowing consumers an opportunity to opt out from
disclosure." The defendant claimed this approach was consistent
with the CCPA's notice and consent requirements. The court,
however, granted plaintiff's motion to compel, stating that,
"[n]othing in the CCPA presents a bar to civil discovery. Notably,
no other case has so held. And the statute itself explicitly says
that it is not a restriction on a business's ability to comply with
federal law." The court later dismissed an amended complaint on
similar grounds.

In March, Walmart scored a massive win for defendants in data
privacy litigation in the Lavarious Gardiner v. Walmart Inc. et al.
case. The Court adopted Walmart's narrow interpretation of the CCPA
and dismissed Plaintiff's non-cognizable CCPA claim. As a reminder,
this case involved a plaintiff inferring, from finding his
information on the dark web, that Walmart had suffered a data
breach. In response, Walmart argued first, that Plaintiff's failure
to allege when the breach purportedly occurred was fatal to the
Complaint because the CCPA is not retroactive. The Court sided with
Walmart and agreed that Plaintiff needed to plead a breach
occurring after January 1, 2020: "Absent allegations establishing
that Walmart's alleged violation of the CCPA occurred after it went
into effect, Plaintiff's CCPA claim is not viable. Second, the
Court also held that Plaintiff's CCPA claim failed for the
additional reason that Plaintiff did not sufficiently allege
disclosure of his personal information as defined in the CCPA. Cal.
Civ. Code Section 1798.81.5. The Court found insufficient the
Complaint's allegation that the purported breach compromised the
full names, financial account information, credit card information,
and other PII of Walmart customers: "[a]lthough in the Complaint
Plaintiff generally refers to financial information and credit card
fraud, he does not allege the disclosure of a credit or debit card
or account number, and the required security or access code to
access the account." (emphasis added).

In July, 2021 the Central District of California denied a motion to
compel arbitration brought by the Gap in the data breach
litigation, Shadi Hayden v. Retail Equation et al., No. 20-cv-01203
(C.D. Cal. July 07, 2020). There the court reasoned that, because
the Gap was not a party to the arbitration agreement it attempt to
invoke, the arbitration agreement did not apply to bar the
litigation. The Gap subsequently appealed, and the case remains
pending.

In an August decision, a federal judge found the majority of
Plaintiffs' statutory claims to withstand a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to
dismiss in the In re Blackbaud data privacy multi-district
litigation. MDL No. 2972 (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 2021). Plaintiffs'
allegations that a cyberattack resulting from Blackbaud's
"deficient security program" and failure to comply with industry
and regulatory standards, was sufficient to withstand a motion to
dismiss.  As to the CCPA, the Court found that Blackbaud was
alleged to be a "business" under the CCPA, relying largely on its
registration as a "data broker" under California law. The Court
notably rejected Blackbaud's argument that it was a "service
provider" as insulating it from liability under the CCPA.

In another significant ruling, in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corp.,
No. 21-cv-01418-EMC, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154093 (N.D. Cal. Aug.
16, 2021) the Northern District of California recently denied in
part a defendant's motion to dismiss a complaint alleging
violations of various consumer privacy statutes. Of note, the Court
found that an affirmative defense of compliance with one privacy
statute, the CCPA, did not shield defendant from liability for
alleged violations of other state laws.

Finally, in December, the Northern District of California denied a
motion to intervene and oppose a preliminary approved settlement in
the litigation that followed a widespread data event Accellion had
suffered. Cochran v. Accellion, Inc., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214686
(N.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2021). In Cochran, one of the entities that used
Accellion as a services provider agreed as part of a $5 million
dollar settlement to modify its business practices going forward.
This would include switching to a "new secure file transfer
solution," securing or destroying the personal information subject
to the data event and boosting its third-party vendor risk
management program. In denying the Proposed Intervenor's Motion to
Intervene, the Court analyzed intervention as a matter of right and
permissive intervention. The Court, however, rejected that
intervenors could intervene as a matter of right because the Court
heard the Proposed Intervenors' objections to the proposed
settlement on two occasions, the settlement agreement allows
putative intervenors to protect their interests by opting out of
the settlement class, and because the Court found that the Proposed
Intervenors interest in a preliminary settlement approval is not a
"significant protectable interest." The Court denied permissive
intervention because, among other things, the Proposed Intervenors
already had the opportunity to participate in the fairness
hearings.

Predictions for CCPA Litigation in 2022
So what is on the horizon for 2022? Certainly an expansion of
consumer privacy laws that follow California's lead. This past year
saw Virginia and Colorado launch privacy legislation and that trend
will continue in 2022. While claims invoking the consumer privacy
law of other states may be kept at bay during 2022, the lessons
learned from CCPA litigation will come into play in 2023 as those
new laws, particularly those with a private right of action, start
going into effect.

In the meantime, we can expect that the lawsuits making their way
through the courts will continue shaping the contours of CCPA
litigation. Of particular interest will be the impact of the
Ramirez v. TransUnion decision upon class action litigation,
including CCPA claims arising from a data incident. As previously
noted, which commentators worried that Ramirez might preclude data
breach litigations from being brought in federal courts, those
concerns have not materialized, with CCPA claims remaining just at
home in federal court in state court.

We can also expect to see continued enforcement activity at the
state level. In July 2021, California's Attorney General Bonta
issued a press release summarizing its first year of CCPA
enforcement and reinforcing its commitment to CCPA enforcement. The
pressure will remain on companies to annually update their
California privacy notices to avoid finding themselves the target
of enforcement activities.

2022 is going to remain busy for CCPA litigation and enforcement.
Not to worry, CPW will be there to keep you in the loop. Stay
tuned. [GN]


                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Rousel Elaine T.
Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L.
Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2022. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***