/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/CAR_Public/240516.mbx               C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

              Thursday, May 16, 2024, Vol. 26, No. 99

                            Headlines

2U INC: Discloses Personal Info to Third Parties, De la Paz Says
ADVANCED MEDICAL: Bid for Initial OK of Settlement Deal Nixed
ALLIANCE LIFTBOATS: Breaux Sues Over Nonpayment of Overtime Wages
ALLSTREAM TECHNICAL: Bibbs Sues Over Worker Misclassification
AMERICAN AIRLINES: Continues to Defend Private Party Antitrust Suit

APPLE INC: Daines & Babb Sue Over Smartphone Market Monopolization
ARBONNE INTERNATIONAL: Website Inaccessible to Blind, Karim Says
AT&T INC: Garner et al. Sue Over Unsecured Customers' Private Info
BERRICLE LLC: Website Inaccessible to Blind People, Karim Alleges
BLUEGRASS HOSPITALITY: Faces Anderson Wage-and-Hour Class Suit

BRINKER INT'L: Discovery Deadline Extended to July 12
CAROLINA AMATO: Website Inaccessible to Blind Users, Martinez Says
CASEY'S GENERAL: Class Cert. Hearing Set for Sept. 30, 2025
CBIZ INC: Continues to Defend ERISA Class Suit in S.D.N.Y.
CEC ENTERTAINMENT: Velazquez Suit Removed to C.D. California

CELINE INC: Faces Martinez Suit Over Blind-Inaccessible Website
CHHJ FRANCHISING: Fails to Pay Proper Overtime Wages, Abrams Claims
COLBEA ENTERPRISES: Darden Bid to Certify Class Partly OK'd
EIDP: Filing of Bid for Class Cert in Banks Amended to July 19
EQT TGHL EXPLORATION: Taylor Files Suit in N.D. West Virginia

FEDEX GROUND: Bid to Maintain Documents Under Seal Tossed
FLORIDA POWER: Continues to Defend Service Interruptions-Class Suit
GENERAL MOTORS: Figlio and Gordin Sue Over Unconsented Data Sharing
GOL LINHAS: June 14 Claims Filing Deadline Set
GRIMMWAY ENTERPRISES: Hicks Class Cert Bid Tossed w/o Prejudice

HERSHEY FEDERAL: Garman Files Suit in Pa. Ct. of Common Pleas
KELLER WILLIAMS: Faces McFarlane Suit Over Profit Sharing Program
KOOTENAI HEALTH: Faces Griffiths Suit Over Private Data Breach
KORRES NATURAL: General Pretrial Management Entered in Tarr Suit
KRAEMER NORTH: Court Certifies Class for Settlement Purposes

LINCARE INC: Garate Suit Removed to S.D. California
LOANDEPOT.COM: Class Cert Hearing in Kearns Continued to June 21
MAVERIK INC: Faces Dillard Suit Over PUMP Act Violations
MULTIPLAN INC: Allegiance Health Management Sues Over Price Fixing
NATROL LLC: Filing for Class Cert Bid Due Dec. 19

NEOGENOMICS INC: Continues to Defend Goldenberg Class Suit
NESTLE USA: Partial Discovery Stayed Pending Class Cert Bid Ruling
NEW YORK COMMUNITY: Court Consolidates Lemm and Miskey Actions
PACIFIC GUARDIAN LIFE: Hardy Files Suit in D. Hawaii
PINNACLE GROUP: Fernandez Wins Conditional Status Bid

RECKITT BENCKISER: Riccio Suit Transferred to E.D. New York
RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE: Dietel Sues Over Misleading Statements
RPM INTERNATIONAL: J&L Imperium Suit Transferred to S.D. New York
S & C BRIDAL: Karim Sues over Blind-Inaccessible Website Design
SANDUSKY, OH: Seeks More Time for Class Cert Response

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY: Seeks Dismissal of Consolidated Securities Suit
SEAWORLD PARKS: Coppel Wins Bid for Class Certification
SELECTQUOTE AUTO: Davis Bid to Compel Discovery Responses Tossed
SIKA AG: Cal Prime Suit Transferred to S.D. New York
SIKA AG: D'Onofrio General Suit Transferred to S.D. New York

SIKA AG: H&S Ready Mix Suit Transferred to S.D. New York
SIKA AG: Park Construction Suit Transferred to S.D. New York
SIKA AG: Vera Construction Suit Transferred to S.D. New York
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES: Seeks More Time to File Response
SPECIALIZED LOAN: Fails to Pay Proper Overtime Wages, Butler Says

STUBHUB INC: Hong Sues Over Deceptive Ticket Pricing Practices
T-MOBILE US: Borzenkova Seeks Damages for Biometric Law Violations
TAKEDA PHARMA: Filing of Class Cert Bid Due June 14
TANDYM GROUP: Faces Armstrong Data Breach Suit
TAYLOR MORRISON: Continues to Defend Gundel Class Suit

TD BANK: Faces Caraffa Suit Over Unlawful Private Info Disclosure
TELADOC HEALTH: Dismissal of Consolidated Suit Under Appeal
TJX COMPANIES: Embeds Spy Pixel Trackers in Emails, Campos Says
TWITTER INC: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Ma Due June 17
TYCO FIRE: Camden City Sues Over Exposure to Toxic Chemicals

TYSON FOODS: Colvin Wins Class Cert. Bid
TYSON FOODS: McEntire Bid for Class Status OK'd
USC: Class Cert Bid Filing Continued to Nov. 8 in Favell Suit
USC: Class Cert Bid Filing Continued to Nov. 8 in Zarnowski Suit
VALLEY MOUNTAIN: Neff Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.

VANTAGE SUPPORTED: Green Seeks Proper Overtime Wages
VMSB LLC: Bid for Leave to File Class Cert Opposition OK'd
WARNER MUSIC: Class Cert Bid Filing in Hall Due July 26
WASHINGTON FINE WINE: Branson Suit Removed to W.D. Washington
WAYNE COUNTY, MI: 26 Plaintiffs Dismissed from Harris Suit

XEROX CORP: Filing of Bid for Class Cert Revised to Feb. 4, 2025

                            *********

2U INC: Discloses Personal Info to Third Parties, De la Paz Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
HENRY DE LA PAZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. 2U, INC. and EDX, LLC, Defendant, Case No.
1:24-cv-11049 (D. Mass., April 19, 2024) accuses the Defendant of
violating the Video Privacy Protection Act.

Allegedly, Defendants disclose personally identifiable information
to third parties, like Braze, Google, and Twilio. The Defendants
disclose information to these third parties sufficient to identify
Plaintiff and the Class members and the specific videos they
watched, says the suit.

Based in Cambridge, MA, edX, LLC is a Delaware limited liability
company that owns and operates
edX, a mobile application containing videos of online courses.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          James J. Reardon, Jr., Esq.
          REARDON SCANLON LLP
          45 South Main Street, 3rd Floor
          West Hartford, CT 06107
          Telephone: (860) 955-9455
          Facsimile: (860) 920-5242
          E-mail: james.reardon@reardonscanlon.com

                  - and -

          Yitzchak Kopel, Esq.
          Max S. Roberts, Esq.
          Victoria X. Zhou, Esq.
          BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
          1330 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
          New York, NY 10019
          Telephone: (646) 837-7150
          Facsimile: (212) 989-9163
          E-mail: ykopel@bursor.com
                  mroberts@bursor.com
                  vzhou@bursor.com

                  - and -

          Joshua R. Wilner, Esq.
          BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
          1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
          Walnut Creek, CA 94596
          Telephone: (925) 300-4455
          Facsimile: (925) 407-2700
          E-mail: jwilner@bursor.com

ADVANCED MEDICAL: Bid for Initial OK of Settlement Deal Nixed
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Anthony Brent, et al., v.
ADVANCED MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, LLC et al, Case No. 1:23-cv-03254-JKB
(D. Md.), the Hon. Judge James Bredar entered a memo denying the
motion for preliminary approval of settlement agreement and the
provisional certification of the Settlement Class.

Advanced provides operational, administrative and technical
healthcare management services.

A copy of the Court's memorandum dated May 7, 2024, is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=GQuapg at no extra
charge.[CC]

ALLIANCE LIFTBOATS: Breaux Sues Over Nonpayment of Overtime Wages
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PATRICK BREAUX, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. ALLIANCE LIFTBOATS, LLC AND THE L/B MIAMI IN
REM, HER ENGINES, TACKLE, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES, ETC.,
Defendants, Case No. 2:24-cv-01000-SM-KWR (E.D. La., April 19,
2024) seeks to recover unpaid overtime wages and other damages from
the Defendants pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Plaintiff Patrick Breaux, for the past thirteen years, has been a
crane operator and a cook on vessels and liftboats. The Defendant
misclassified Mr. Breaux and others similarly situated as exempt
from state and federal overtime laws even though the services they
performed is non-exempt work. Among other things, Defendant did not
pay them overtime when they worked over 40 hours in an individual
workweek, says the suit.

Alliance Liftboats, LLC owns and operates the L/B Miami, the L/B
Dallas, the L/B Charleston, and other vessels. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         Cayce C. Peterson, Esq.
         Jeffrey P. Green, Esq.
         Joseph B. Marino, III, Esq.
         JJC LAW LLC
         111 Veterans Memorial Blvd.
         Heritage Plaza, Suite 810
         Metairie, LA 70005
         Telephone: (504) 513-8820
         Facsimile: (504) 513-8824
         E-mail: cayce@jjclaw.com
                 jeff@jjclaw.com
                 josh@jjclaw.com

ALLSTREAM TECHNICAL: Bibbs Sues Over Worker Misclassification
-------------------------------------------------------------
AARON BIBBS, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated
individuals, Plaintiff v. ALLSTREAM TECHNICAL CONSULTANTS, INC.,
STEVE EPPOLITO, and CLAYTON STOKES, Defendants, Case No.
4:24-cv-01442 (S.D. Tex., April 19, 2024) accuses the Defendants of
violating the Fair Labor Standards Act by misclassifying its
inspectors as independent contractors.

The Defendants hired Plaintiff Bibbs in September of 2018 to
conduct inspections for oil and gas operations. Plaintiff generally
worked 12 hour days, often Monday through Sunday. However,
Defendants did not pay Plaintiff or any of the similarly situated
workers time-and-a-half for any of the overtime hours that they
worked for Defendants, says the suit.

Headquartered in Houston, TX, Allstream Technical Consultants, Inc.
provides technical, quality assurance, and management services to
the upstream midstream, and downstream sectors of the oil and gas
industry. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         Thomas H. Padgett, Jr., Esq.
         Josef F. Buenker, Esq.
         THE BUENKER LAW FIRM
         P.O. Box 10099
         Houston, TX 77206
         Telephone: (713) 868-3388
         Facsimile: (713) 683-9940
         E-mail: tpadgett@buenkerlaw.com
                 jbuenker@buenkerlaw.com

AMERICAN AIRLINES: Continues to Defend Private Party Antitrust Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------------
American Airlines Group Inc. disclosed in its Form 20-F Report for
the fiscal period ending December 31, 2023 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 25, 2024, that the
Company continues to defend itself from the private party antitrust
class suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of New York.

On December 5, 2022 and December 7, 2022, two private party
plaintiffs filed putative class action antitrust complaints against
American and JetBlue in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of New York alleging that American and JetBlue violated
U.S. antitrust law in connection with the previously disclosed NEA.


These actions were consolidated on January 10, 2023.

The private party plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated
complaint on February 3, 2023.

On February 2, 2023 and February 15, 2023, private party plaintiffs
filed two additional putative class action antitrust complaints
against American and JetBlue in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Massachusetts and the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of New York, respectively.

In March 2023, American filed a motion in the U.S. District Court
for the District of Massachusetts case asking to transfer the case
to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York and
consolidate it with the cases pending in that venue.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted
that motion.

The remaining cases were consolidated with the other actions in the
Eastern District of New York.

In June 2023, the private party plaintiffs filed a second amended
consolidated complaint, followed by a third amended complaint filed
in August 2023.

In September 2023, American, together with JetBlue, filed a motion
to dismiss the third amended complaint, and that motion remains
pending.

American believes these lawsuits are without merit and is defending
against them vigorously.

Headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas, American Airlines Group Inc.
operates an airline.


APPLE INC: Daines & Babb Sue Over Smartphone Market Monopolization
------------------------------------------------------------------
TORY DAINES and SARAH BABB, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. APPLE INC., Defendant,
Case No. 2:24-cv-05359 (D.N.J., April 19, 2024) arises from
Defendant's anticompetitive and monopolistic practices in the
smartphone market that resulted to artificially inflated prices of
iPhones.

According to the complaint, Apple unlawfully maintained a
smartphone monopoly by, among other means, suppressing the
following five key technologies that otherwise would have
stimulated competition in the smartphone market: super apps, cloud
streaming game apps, messaging apps, smartwatches, and digital
wallets. Accordingly, Plaintiffs allege that the Defendant violated
the Sherman Act and demand a trial by jury and treble damages,
injunctive relief, and other appropriate relief based on
Defendant's illicit monopolization.

Headquartered Cupertino, CA, Apple Inc. is technology company that
designs, develops, and sells consumer electronics, computer
software, and online services. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Michelle C. Clerkin, Esq.
          SPIRO HARRISON & NELSON
          40 Exchange Place, Suite 1404
          New York, NY 10005
          Telephone: (646) 880-8850
          Facsimile: (973) 232-0887
          E-mail: mclerkin@shnlegal.com

                  - and -

          David B. Harrison, Esq.
          Eric H. Jaso, Esq.
          Joseph M. Esposito, Esq.
          Alexandria D. Martinez, Esq.
          SPIRO HARRISON & NELSON
          363 Bloomfield Avenue, Suite 2C
          Montclair, NJ 07042
          Telephone: (973) 509-9521
          Facsimile: (973) 232-0887
          E-mail: dharrison@shnlegal.com
                  ejaso@shnlegal.com
                  jesposito@shnlegal.com
                  amartinez@shnlegal.com

                  - and -

          Jason C. Spiro, Esq.
          SPIRO HARRISON & NELSON
          200 Monmouth Street, Suite 310
          Red Bank, NJ 07701
          Telephone: (732) 784-1470
          Facsimile: (973) 232-0887
          E-mail: jspiro@shnlegal.com

                  - and -

          Rachel Dapeer, Esq.
          DAPEER LAW, P.A.
          20900 NE 30th Avenue, #417
          Aventura, FL 33180
          Telephone: (954) 799-5914
          E-mail: rachel@dapeer.com

ARBONNE INTERNATIONAL: Website Inaccessible to Blind, Karim Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
JESSICA KARIM, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. Arbonne International, LLC, Defendant, Case
No. 1:24-cv-02998-GHW (S.D.N.Y., April 19, 2024) arises from
Defendant's failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate
their website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by
Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons in violation
of Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The Defendant failed and refused to remove access barriers to
Arbonne.com, blind individuals have been and are being denied equal
access to Arbonne International, as well as to the numerous goods,
services and benefits offered to the public through Arbonne.com,
says the suit.

Headquartered in Arbonne International controls and operates
Arbonne.com, a commercial website that offers several products,
including skincare and makeup products. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Gabriel A. Levy, Esq.
          GABRIEL A. LEVY, P.C.
          1129 Northern Blvd, Suite 404
          Manhasset, NY 11030
          Telephone: (347) 941-4715
          E-mail: Glevyfirm@gmail.com

AT&T INC: Garner et al. Sue Over Unsecured Customers' Private Info
------------------------------------------------------------------
COURTNEY GARNER, JERYL LUCIANI, and MICHAEL CRAIN, on behalf of
themselves and a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs v.
AT&T, INC., Defendant, Case No. 3:24-cv-00962-B (N.D. Tex., April
19, 2024) arises from a massive data breach that impacts 73 million
of Defendant's customers and assert claims for negligence,
negligence per se, gross negligence, breach of express contracts,
breach of implied contracts, breach of implied duty of good faith
and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, and for violations of several
state consumer protection laws, including Florida Deceptive and
Unfair Trade Practices Act.

According to the complaint, AT&T has admitted that hackers gained
access to customer information and may have obtained full names,
email addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers, Social Security
numbers, dates of birth, AT&T account numbers, and passcodes.
Accordingly, Plaintiffs seek to remedy these harms on behalf of
themselves and all similarly situated individuals whose private
information was accessed during the data breach.

Headquartered in Dallas, TX, AT&T, Inc. provides Internet,
landline, television and wireless voice and data services
throughout the United States, including for approximately 241
million cellular network subscribers. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

           Robert C. Hilliard, Esq.
           HILLIARD LAW  
           719 S. Shoreline Blvd.
           Corpus Christi, TX 78401
           Telephone No.: (361) 882-1612
           Facsimile No: (361) 882-3015

                   - and -

           Thomas E. Loeser, Esq.
           Karin B. Swope, Esq.
           COTCHETT PITRE & MCCARTHY LLP
           999 N. Northlake Way, Suite 215
           Seattle, WA 98103
           Telephone: (206) 802-1272
           Facsimile: (650) 697-0577
           E-mail: tloeser@cpmlegal.com
                   kswope@cpmlegal.com

                   - and -

           Andrew F. Kirtley, Esq.
           Gia Jung, Esq.
           San Francisco Airport Office Center
           840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
           Burlingame, CA 94010
           Telephone: (650) 697-6000
           Facsimile: (650) 697-0577
           E-mail: akirtley@cpmlegal.com.com
                   Gjung@cpmlegal.com

BERRICLE LLC: Website Inaccessible to Blind People, Karim Alleges
-----------------------------------------------------------------
JESSICA KARIM, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. Berricle, LLC, Defendant, Case No.
1:24-cv-03005-JPO (S.D.N.Y., April 19, 2024) accuses the Defendant
of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York
State Human Rights Law, and the New York State Civil Rights Law by
failing to design, construct, maintain, and operate their website
to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff and
other blind or visually-impaired persons.

Despite readily available accessible technology, Berricle failed to
remove access barriers of its website. Accordingly, Plaintiff seeks
a permanent injunction to cause a change in Berricle's policies,
practices, and procedures to that Defendant's website will become
and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. She
also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class members for
having been subjected to unlawful discrimination.

Headquartered in Whitestone, NY, Berricle, LLC owns and operates
Berricle.com, a commercial website that offers several products for
online sale, including jewelry. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         Gabriel A. Levy, Esq, Esq.
         GABRIEL A. LEVY, P.C.
         1129 Northern Blvd, Suite 404
         Manhasset, NY 11030
         Telephone: (347) 941-4715
         E-mail: Glevyfirm@gmail.com

BLUEGRASS HOSPITALITY: Faces Anderson Wage-and-Hour Class Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
SABINA ANDERSON and PAUL PRESTARRI, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated v. BLUEGRASS HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC and
BLUEGRASS HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, LLC, Case No. 5:24-cv-00110 (E.D.
Ky., April 23, 2024) accuses the Defendants of violating the Fair
Labor Standards Act and the Kentucky Wages and Hours Act.

The Plaintiffs were employed by Defendants as "tip credit
employees", working as servers at Defendants’ two restaurants in
Lexington, Kentucky. According to Plaintiffs, the Defendants failed
to pay them at the statutory minimum wage rate and did not properly
compensate them for all overtime hours worked. Additionally, the
Defendants allegedly violated the tip credit provisions of the FLSA
and the KWHA by failing to satisfy the notice requirement for
taking the tip credit, requiring Plaintiffs to spend substantial
amounts of time performing non-tip-producing tasks throughout their
shift, and requiring them to remit their tips to a tip pool for
distribution among other employees, say the Plaintiffs.

Bluegrass Hospitality Group, LLC is a restaurant group based in
Lexington, KY. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

        DAVID W. GARRISON, Esq.
        JOSHUA A. FRANK, Esq.
        NICOLE A. CHANIN, Esq.
        BARRETT JOHNSTON MARTIN & GARRISON, PLLC     
        200 31st Avenue North
        Nashville, TN 37203
        Telephone: (615) 244-2202
        Facsimile: (615) 252-3798
        E-mail: dgarrison@barrettjohnston.com
                jfrank@barrettjohnston.com
                nchanin@barrettjohnston.com

BRINKER INT'L: Discovery Deadline Extended to July 12
------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. BRINKER INTERNATIONAL PAYROLL COMPANY,
L.P., et al., Case No. 4:22-cv-00820-KGB (E.D. Ark.), the Hon.
Judge Kristine Baker entered an order granting the parties' joint
motion to modify the Court's Amended Final Scheduling Order.

The Court extends the discovery deadline for 60 days, until July
12, 2024, so that the parties may complete 30(b)(6) depositions.

The Court also extends the deadline for filing discovery-related
motions for 60 days. The deadline for filing all motions, except
for motions for class certification and motions in limine, is
extended to, and including, July 22, 2024.

The Court grants a continuance of the trial date and removes the
case from the trial calendar for the week of September 23, 2024.

The Court will reset all other pretrial deadlines and set a new
trial date by separate Order.

Brinker operates as a restaurant.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=3TwE2j at no extra
charge.[CC]

CAROLINA AMATO: Website Inaccessible to Blind Users, Martinez Says
------------------------------------------------------------------
SILVIA MARTINEZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated v. CAROLINA AMATO ACCESSORIES, INC., Case No.
1:24-cv-02984 (E.D.N.Y., April 22, 2024) accuses the Defendant of
discriminating against blind and visually impaired persons, in
violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The Plaintiff, a blind, visually-impaired handicapped person,
brings this action over Defendant’s failure to build its website,
www.amatonewyork.com, in a manner that is compatible with screen
access programs. As a result of that access barrier, the Defendant
allegedly denied Plaintiff the benefit of purchasing the product
Plaintiff wished to acquire from the website, violating her rights
under ADA.

Carolina Amato Accessories, Inc. is a luxury accessories company
located in New York, NY. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

        Rami Salim, Esq.
        STEIN SAKS, PLLC     
        One University Plaza, Suite 620
        Hackensack, NJ 07601
        Telephone: (201) 282-6500
        Facsimile: (201) 282-6501
        E-mail: rsalim@steinsakslegal.com

CASEY'S GENERAL: Class Cert. Hearing Set for Sept. 30, 2025
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as SUMMER KESSLER, on behalf
of herself and all others similarly situated, v. CASEY'S GENERAL
STORES, INC., CASEY'S MARKETING COMPANY, and CASEY'S RETAIL
COMPANY, Case No. 3:22-cv-02971-SPM (S.D. Ill.), the Hon. Judge
Stephen P. McGlynn entered a class action scheduling and discovery
order as follows:

-- A settlement conference is set before the Honorable Stephen P.

    McGlynn in accordance with SDIL-LR 16.3(b) on October 17, 2024,

    via Zoom video.

-- A Class Certification hearing is set for Sept. 30, 2025, at
9:00
    a.m. before the Honorable Judge Stephen P. McGlynn in East St.

    Louis, Illinois.

-- A final pretrial conference is set for March 24, 2026 at 9:00
a.m.
    before the Honorable Judge Stephen P. McGlynn in East St.
Louis,
    Illinois in accordance with SDIL-LR 16.2(b).

Casey's operates convenience stores.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=dDj2rL at no extra
charge.[CC]

CBIZ INC: Continues to Defend ERISA Class Suit in S.D.N.Y.
----------------------------------------------------------
CBIZ Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending March 31, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 25, 2024, that the Company continues to defend
itself from the ERISA class suit in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York.

On December 14, 2022, four individual participants in the Profit
Sharing Plan for Employees of AllianceBernstein L.P., (the "Plan")
filed a class action complaint (the "Complaint") in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Court")
against AB, current and former members of the Compensation and
Workplace Practices Committee of the Board, and the Investment and
Administrative Committees under the Plan.

Plaintiffs, who seek to represent a class of all participants in
the Plan from December 14, 2016 to the present, allege that
defendants violated their fiduciary duties and engaged in
prohibited transactions under the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), by including
proprietary collective investment trusts as investment options
offered under the Plan.

The Complaint seeks unspecified damages, disgorgement and other
equitable relief.

On March 25, 2024, the Court granted AB's motion to dismiss the
Complaint in its entirety.

Plaintiffs were given 30 days to file a motion for leave to amend
their Complaint or appeal the Court's decision.

To date, the Company have not received notice of any subsequent
Court filings made by the Plaintiffs.

While the ultimate outcome of this matter is currently not
determinable, the Company doesn't believe this litigation will have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition or liquidity.

CBIZ is a corporation, with "more than 120 offices and 6,500 team
members," that provides "financial and benefits and insurance
services to organizations of all sizes, as well as individual
clients.[BN]



CEC ENTERTAINMENT: Velazquez Suit Removed to C.D. California
------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Stacey Velazquez, on behalf of herself and
others similarly situated v. CEC ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, and DOES 1 to
100, inclusive, Case No. 24STCV07299 was removed from the Superior
Court of California for the County of Los Angeles, to the United
States District Court for the Central District of California on
April 29, 2024, and assigned Case No. 2:24-cv-03519.

The Complaint asserts seven causes of action for Failure to Pay
Wages for All Hours Worked in Violation of California Labor Code;
Failure to Pay Overtime Wages in Violation of California Labor
Code; Failure to Authorize Meal Periods in Violation of California
Labor Code and Wage Order 5; Failure to Authorize Rest Periods in
Violation of California Labor Code and Wage Order 5; Failure to
Provide Complete and Accurate Wage Statements in Violation of
California Labor Code; Failure to Pay All Earned Wages At
Separation of Employment in Violation of California Labor Code; and
Unfair Business Practices in Violation of California Business and
Professions Code.[BN]

The Defendant is represented by:

          Leo Q. Li, Esq.
          John T. Ayres-Mann, Esq.
          SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
          2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500
          Los Angeles, CA 90067-3021
          Phone: (310) 277-7200
          Facsimile: (310) 201-5210
          Email: lli@seyfarth.com
                 jayers-mann@seyfarth.com

               - and -

          Gina Gi, Esq.
          SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
          601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3300
          Los Angeles, CA 90017-5793
          Phone: (213) 270-9600
          Facsimile: (213) 270-9601
          Email: ggi@seyfarth.com


CELINE INC: Faces Martinez Suit Over Blind-Inaccessible Website
---------------------------------------------------------------
SILVIA MARTINEZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated v. CELINE, INC., Case No. 1:24-cv-02985 (E.D.N.Y., April
22, 2024) accuses the Defendant of violating the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who
relies on screen-reading software to read website content using the
computer. The Plaintiff alleges that Defendant failed to design,
construct, maintain, and operate its website, www.celine.com, to be
fully accessible to Plaintiff and other visually-impaired people.
As a result, Plaintiff was allegedly denied of the goods and
services offered by Defendant, in violation of ADA.

Headquartered in New York, NY, Celine, Inc. manufactures and
markets apparels and leather products. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

        Rami Salim, Esq.
        STEIN SAKS, PLLC     
        One University Plaza, Suite 620
        Hackensack, NJ 07601
        Telephone: (201) 282-6500
        Facsimile: (201) 282-6501
        E-mail: rsalim@steinsakslegal.com

CHHJ FRANCHISING: Fails to Pay Proper Overtime Wages, Abrams Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------------
IZAIAH ABRAMS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. CHHJ FRANCHISING L.L.C., Defendant, Case No.
8:24-cv-00949 (M.D. Fla., April 19, 2024) accuses the Defendant of
violating the overtime provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

From June 2022 through September 2023, the Defendant employed
Plaintiff Abrams as a junior captain mover. Throughout his
employment for Defendant, the Plaintiff typically worked six days
per week, regularly working over 40 hours in a work week, but not
receiving overtime compensation for each hour worked over 40 hours,
says the suit.

Based in Florida, CHHJ Franchising LLC provides full-service
moving, junk removal and trash pickup, proving packing services,
and provides donation pickup services. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Gary L. Printy, Jr., Esq.
          THE PRINTY LAW FIRM
          5407 N Florida Avenue
          Tampa, FL 33604
          Telephone: (813) 434-0649
          Facsimile: (813) 423-6543
          E-mail: garyjr@printylawfirm.com
                  e-service@printylawfirm.com

COLBEA ENTERPRISES: Darden Bid to Certify Class Partly OK'd
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JOSHALYN DARDEN,
individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, v. COLBEA
ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., and ANDREW DELLI CARPINI, Case No.
1:23-cv-11540-JEK (D. Mass.), the Hon. Judge Julia Kobick entered
an order:

-- granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff's motion to

    conditionally certify a class and authorize notice pursuant to
29
    U.S.C. section 216(b);

-- granting the plaintiff's motion to compel discovery; and

-- denying the plaintiff's request for costs and attorneys' fees
    incurred in connection with the motion to compel.

The defendants shall identify all putative collective members by
providing a list of their names, last known mailing addresses, and
e-mail addresses in electronic and importable format within 30 days
of the entry of this order.

The Plaintiff moves for conditional certification and
court-authorized notice under 29 U.S.C. section 216(b) of her Fair
Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") claim on behalf of a proposed
collective comprising:

     "all individuals currently or formerly employed by Colbea
     Enterprises LLC as hourly employees in Massachusetts who were

     subject to its time rounding practice relative to tracking
     employees' work time."

The Plaintiff Darden alleges that the defendants violated the
Massachusetts Wage Act, by failing to pay her and other potential
class members wages for time worked and by failing to issue pay
stubs that accurately reflect the total number of hours worked.

The Plaintiff Darden also alleges that the defendants violated the
FLSA, by failing to pay her and other potential collective members
overtime at the appropriate rate when they work over 40 hours per
week.

Colbea operates a chain of convenience stores throughout
Massachusetts under the name "Seasons Corner Market."

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=iz1Rf1 at no extra
charge.[CC]

EIDP: Filing of Bid for Class Cert in Banks Amended to July 19
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as DORIS BANKS, et al., v.
EIDP, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-01672-JLH (D. Del.), the Hon. Judge
Jennifer Hall entered an order amending scheduling order as
follows:

            Event                     Current           Amended
                                      Deadline          Deadline

  Class Certification Discovery      May 3, 2024       June 25,
2024
  Cut-Off

  Plaintiffs' Motion for Class       June 21, 2024     July 19,
2024
  Certification and Brief in
  Support of Motion; Plaintiffs'
  Class Certification Expert
  Disclosures

  Deadline for Deposition of         Aug. 21, 2024     Sept. 18,
2024
  Plaintiffs' Class Experts

  Deadline for Deposition of         Oct. 23, 2024     Nov. 20,
2024
  Defendants' Class Experts

  Plaintiffs' Reply in Further       Nov. 22, 2024     Dec. 20,
2024
  Support of Class Certification
  Motion; Plaintiffs' Objections
  to Defendants' Class Certification
  Expert Disclosures and Opposition
  to Defendants' Objections to
  Plaintiffs' Class Experts

  Defendants' Opposition to          Dec. 13, 2024     Jan. 10,
2025
  Plaintiffs' Objections to
  Defendants' Class Experts

The parties propose no changes to the following deadlines of the
Scheduling Order (D.I. 218):

  Post Class Certification Conference           TBA
  (No Change)

  Merits Fact Discovery Closes                  TBD
  (No Change)

  Pre-Trial Conference                          TBD
  (No Change)

  TRIAL                                         TBD
  (No Change)

The Court previously entered a Scheduling Order in this action on
Oct. 11, 2023.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=S3zAqk at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Thomas Crumplar, Esq.
          JACOBS & CRUMPLAR, P.A.
          750 Shipyard Drive, Suite 200
          Wilmington DE 19801
          Telephone: (302) 656-5445
          E-mail: tom@jcdelaw.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Kelly E. Farnan, Esq.
          RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
          One Rodney Square
          920 N. King Street
          Wilmington, DE 19801
          Telephone: (302) 651-7700
          E-mail: farnan@rlf.com

                - and -

          Catherine A. Gaul, Esq.
          Andrew Colin Mayo, Esq.
          Randall J. Teti
          ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A.
          500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
          Wilmington, DE 19801
          Telephone: (302) 654-1888
          E-mail: cgaul@ashbygeddes.com
                  amayo@ashbygeddes.com
                  rteti@ashbygeddes.com

                - and -

          Kaan Ekiner, Esq.
          COZEN O'CONNOR
          1201 North Market Street, Suite 1001
          Wilmington, DE 19801
          Telephone: (302) 295-2035
          E-mail: kekiner@cozen.com

                - and -

          Gerry Gray, Esq.
          DOROSHOW, PASQUALE, KRAWITZ & BHAYA
          14 Village Square
          Smyrna, DE 19977
          Telephone: (302) 508-2140
          E-mail: GerryGray@dplaw.com

                - and -

          Andrew S. Dupre, Esq.
          David A. Schlier, Esq.
          McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP
          Renaissance Centre
          405 North King Street, 8th Floor
          Wilmington, DE 19801
          Telephone: (302) 984-6300
          E-mail: adupre@mccarter.com
                  dschlier@mccarter.com

                - and -

          Brian D. Tome, Esq.
          REILLY, MCDEVITT & HENRICH, P.C.
          Delle Donne Corporate Center
          1013 Centre Road, Suite 210
          Wilmington, DE 19805
          Telephone: (302) 777-1700
          E-mail: BTome@rmh-law.com

EQT TGHL EXPLORATION: Taylor Files Suit in N.D. West Virginia
-------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against EQT TGHL Exploration,
LLC, et al. The case is styled as Ralph Taylor, Lloyd Baker,
individually, and on behalf of all individuals and legal entities
similarly situated v. EQT TGHL Exploration, LLC, Tug Hill
Operating, LLC, Case No. 5:24-cv-00082-JPB (N.D.W. Va., April 29,
2024).

The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud.

EQT Corporation -- https://www.eqt.com/ -- is a leading independent
natural gas producer with an evolutionary focus on our future.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Joseph M. Scipione, Esq.
          THE NITTANY GROUP
          2437 Commercial Blvd., Suite 240
          State College, PA 16801
          Phone: (814) 826-2244
          Fax: (877) 424-3267
          Email: Joe.Scipione@nittanygroup.com

               - and -

          Mark A. Kepple, Esq.
          BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC
          1219 Chapline St.
          Wheeling, WV 26003
          Phone: (304) 233-3100
          Fax: (304) 233-0201
          Email: mkepple@baileywyant.com

               - and -

          Robert L. Redfearn, Jr., Esq.
          SIMON, PERAGINE, SMITH & REDFEARN, LLP
          1100 Poydras Street, Suite 3000
          New Orleans, LA 70163
          Phone: (504) 569-2030
          Email: robertjr@spsr-law.com

               - and -

          Thomas E. White, Esq.
          WHITE LAW OFFICE
          604 Sixth St.
          Moundsville, WV 26041
          Phone: (304) 845-7008
          Fax: (304) 845-7016
          Email: twhite@lawyer.com


FEDEX GROUND: Bid to Maintain Documents Under Seal Tossed
----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JORDAN ROY and JUSTIN
TRUMBULL, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, v.
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEMS, INC., Case No. 3:17-cv-30116-KAR (D.
Mass.), the Hon. Judge Katherine Robertson entered an order denying
the Defendant FedEx Ground's motion to maintain under seal
documents attached to the Plaintiffs' decertification opposition.

The Plaintiffs are directed to file copies of the documents
discussed within 21 days of issuance of this order.

The court declines to accede to FedEx's request to maintain
impoundment of the Compliance Manual in part or in whole because,
to a significant extent, the procedures the Compliance Manual
describes have already been publicly disclosed.

The court has already rejected FedEx's claim that information
identifying FedEx's Massachusetts ISPs should remain impounded
because it was subject to the Agreement’s confidentiality
provision.

On August 18, 2023, the defendant filed its motion to decertify the
collective provisionally certified by this court. The Plaintiffs
opposed the motion, supporting their opposition by exhibits some of
which were provisionally sealed. On Oct. 10, 2023, FedEx moved to
maintain certain of the Plaintiffs' exhibits under seal. The
Plaintiffs have opposed the motion.

The Plaintiffs, along with more than 400 other individuals who
opted into this Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") case, delivered
FedEx packages in Massachusetts beginning Feb. 19, 2015. They
contended that FedEx was a joint employer with the ISPs and that
they were not paid overtime for the hours over forty when they
worked more than forty 40 in a week.

Fedex delivers packages by truck to residential and business
addresses throughout North America.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=linYXP at no extra
charge.[CC]




FLORIDA POWER: Continues to Defend Service Interruptions-Class Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Florida Power & Light Co. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending March 31, 2024 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2024, that the Company
continues to defend itself from the service interruptions-related
class suit.

FPL is the defendant in a purported class action lawsuit filed in
February 2018 that seeks from FPL unspecified damages for alleged
breach of contract and gross negligence based on service
interruptions that occurred as a result of Hurricane Irma in 2017.


There is currently no trial date set.

The Miami-Dade County Circuit Court certified the case as a class
action and FPL's appeal of that decision was denied by Florida's
Third District Court of Appeal (3rd DCA) in March 2023.

The certified class encompasses all persons and business owners who
reside in and are otherwise citizens of the state of Florida that
contracted with FPL for electrical services, were charged storm
charges, experienced a power outage after Hurricane Irma and
suffered consequential damages because of FPL's alleged breach of
contract or gross negligence.

FPL filed a motion on March 31, 2023, for rehearing with the 3rd
DCA claiming that the opinion upholding the class certification
contains several errors that should be reheard by the full 3rd DCA.


The motion is pending.

Additionally, in July 2023, FPL filed a motion to dismiss the
lawsuit on the basis that, among other things, it believes the FPSC
has exclusive jurisdiction over any issues arising from a utility's
preparation for and response to emergencies or disasters.

Oral argument regarding FPL's motion for rehearing is scheduled for
April 24, 2024.

FPL is vigorously defending against the claims in this proceeding.

Florida Power & Light Company is the largest power utility in
Florida. It is a Juno Beach, Florida-based power utility company
serving roughly 5 million customers and 11 million people in
Florida.




GENERAL MOTORS: Figlio and Gordin Sue Over Unconsented Data Sharing
-------------------------------------------------------------------
BARBARA FIGLIO and MORRIS D. GORDIN, on behalf of themselves and
all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC,
ONSTAR LLC, LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS, INC., and VERISK ANALYTICS,
INC., Defendants, Case No. 1:24-cv-01669-TWT-JEM (N.D. Ga., April
19, 2024) alleges that LexisNexis and Verisk violated the Fair
Credit Reporting Act, the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act. Plaintiffs
also bring this action against General Motors and its affiliate,
OnStar, for unfair trade practices, breach of contract, invasion of
privacy and unjust enrichment.

The Plaintiffs seek to represent a class of all persons who
purchased or leased a vehicle from General Motors and had their
personal driving information and behavior transmitted without their
knowing consent to unauthorized third parties, including OnStar,
LexisNexis, Verisk and various insurance carriers.

Headquartered in Detroit, MI, General Motors manufactures and sells
automobiles under four brands: Chevrolet, GMC, Cadillac and Buick.
[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

        Roy E. Barnes, Esq.
        John R. Bevis, Esq.
        J. Cameron Tribble
        BARNES LAW GROUP, LLC
        31 Atlanta Street
        Marietta, GA 30060
        Telephone: (770) 227-6375
        E-mail: roy@barneslawgroup.com
                bevis@barneslawgroup.com
                ctribble@barneslawgroup.com

                - and -

        Gary S. Graifman, Esq.
        Andre J. Arias, Esq.
        KANTROWITZ GOLDHAMER & GRAIFMAN, P.C.
        135 Chestnut Ridge Rd., Suite 200
        Montvale, NJ 07645
        Telephone: (201) 391-7000
        E-mail: ggraifman@kgglaw.com
                aarias@kgglaw.com

                - and -

        Lynda J. Grant, Esq.
        THE GRANT LAW FIRM, PLLC
        521 Fifth Avenue, 17th Floor
        New York, NY 10175
        Telephone: (212) 292-4441
        E-mail: LGrant@grantfirm.com

                - and -

        Howard T. Longman, Esq.
        LONGMAN LAW, P.C.
        354 Eisenhower Parkway, Suite 1800
        Livingston, NJ 07039
        Telephone: (973) 994-2315
        E-mail: hlongman@longman.law.com

GOL LINHAS: June 14 Claims Filing Deadline Set
----------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York set
June 14, 2024, at 11:59 p.m, (prevailing Eastern Time) as the last
date and time for all claimants to file their proof of claims
against GOL Intelligent Airlines Inc a/k/a GOL Linhas Areas
Inteligentes SA and its debtor-affiliates.

The Court also set July 23, 2024, at 11:59 p.m,( prevailing Eastern
Time) as the deadline for all governmental units to file their
claims against the Debtors.

All proofs of claim must be filed so as to be received on or before
the applicable Bar Date:

a) If Electronically:

   i) By following instructions for filing proofs of claim
      on the website established by the Debtors' claims and
      noticing agent, Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC,
      for these Chapter 11 Cases located at
      https://cases.ra.kroll.com/GOL, or

  ii) Through the Court’s Public Access to Court Electronic
      Records  at https://ecf.nysb.uscourts.gov.

If By First Class Mail:

      GOL Claims Processing Center
      c/o Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC
      Grand Central Station, PO Box 4850
      New York, NY 10163-4850

if by hand delivery or overnight service:

      GOL Claims Processing Center
      c/o Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC
      850 3rd Avenue, Suite 412
      Brooklyn, NY 11232

      Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court (hand delivery only)
      United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
      District of New York One Bowling Green, New York, NY 10004

                    About Gol GOLL4.SA

GOL Linhas Aereas Inteligentes S.A. provides scheduled and
non-scheduled air transportation services for passengers and cargo;
and maintenance services for aircraft and components in Brazil and
internationally.  The company offers Smiles, a frequent-flyer
program to approximately 20.5 million members, allowing clients to
accumulate and redeem miles.  It operates a fleet of 146 Boeing 737
aircraft with 674 daily flights.  The company was founded in 2000
and is headquartered in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

GOL Linhas Aereas Inteligentes S.A. and its affiliates and its
subsidiaries voluntarily filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 24-10118) on Jan. 25, 2024.

GOL Linhas estimated $1 billion to $10 billion in assets as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors tapped Milbank Llp as counsel, Seabury Securities Llc
as restructuring advisor, financial advisor and investment banker,
Alixpartners, LLP, as financial advisor, and HUGHES Hubbard & Reed
LLP as aviation related counsel.  Kroll Restructuring
Administration LLC is the claims agent.

GRIMMWAY ENTERPRISES: Hicks Class Cert Bid Tossed w/o Prejudice
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ELIZABETH HICKS, an
individual on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
and the general public, v. GRIMMWAY ENTERPRISES, INC., a
corporation with headquarters in California; and DOES 1–100,
inclusive, Case No. 3:22-cv-02038-JLS-DDL (S.D. Cal.), the Hon.
Judge Janis Sammartino entered an order denying without prejudice
the plaintiff's motion for class certification and vacating
hearing.

Grimmway grows, produces, and supplies agricultural products.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=0ZdNqQ at no extra
charge.[CC]

HERSHEY FEDERAL: Garman Files Suit in Pa. Ct. of Common Pleas
-------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Hershey Federal
Credit Union. The case is styled as Krista Garman, all others
similarly situated v. Hershey Federal Credit Union, Case No.
2024-CV-03088 (Pa. Ct. of Common Pleas, Dauphin Cty., April 29,
2024).

The case type is stated as "Contract Civil."

Hershey Federal Credit Union -- https://www.hersheyfcu.org/ --
operates as a financial cooperative. The Union provides financial
solutions such as loans, investment, savings, credit and debit
cards, online banking, and other related services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Kenneth J. Grunfeld, Esq.
          65 Overhill Road
          Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004


KELLER WILLIAMS: Faces McFarlane Suit Over Profit Sharing Program
-----------------------------------------------------------------
James McFarlane, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, v. Keller Williams Realty, Inc., Case No.
2:24-cv-00152-LEW (D. Maine, May 2, 2024) arises from a breach of
contract by Keller Williams, unjust enrichment to Keller Williams
relating to payments owed under the Keller Williams Profit Sharing
Program.

The Profit Sharing Program was developed to be a way to reward
those associates who helped build the company. Keller Williams used
the Profit Sharing Program as a way to encourage the recruitment of
top associates to Keller Williams by Keller Williams associates.

The Profit Sharing Program was designed to be an open-ended profit

sharing program that allowed Keller Williams associates, investors,
Team Leaders, Market Center staff, Keller Williams staff, and
Regional Directors to participate in profits they helped to create
without assuming any financial risk.

Eligibility to participate in the Profit Sharing Program was
determined by contributing to the growth of Keller Williams by
recruiting new sales associates to any Market Center located
anywhere in the United States or Canada.

Funds in the Profit Sharing Program were distributed in a
multi-tiered format based upon the sponsorship of one associate or
employee by another associate or employee.

Keller Williams associates participated in the Profit Sharing
Program by recruiting other associates who contribute to the
profitability of a Keller Williams Market Center.

Persons recruited into Keller Williams were required to name the
sponsor that recruited them for purposes of calculating Profit
Sharing Program distributions.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         Andrew J. Zulieve, Esq.
         ZULIEVE LAW, LLC
         689 Friendship Road
         Waldoboro, ME 04522
         Phone: 207-790-2185
         Telephone: andy@zulievelaw.com

              - and -

          Kenneth B. McClain, Esq.
          Kevin D. Stanley, Esq.
          Jonathan M. Soper, Esq.
          HUMPHREY, FARRINGTON & MCCLAIN, P.C.
          221 West Lexington Ave., Ste. 400
          Independence, MO 64051
          Telephone: (816) 836-5050
          Facsimile: (816) 836-8966
          E-mail: kbm@hfmlegal.com
                  jms@hfmlegal.com
                  kds@hfmlegal.com

KOOTENAI HEALTH: Faces Griffiths Suit Over Private Data Breach
--------------------------------------------------------------
Sonna Griffiths, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. Kootenai Health Inc., an Idaho Non-Profit
Corporation, Defendant, Case No. 1:24-cv-00205-REP (D. Idaho, April
19, 2024) arises from the Defendant's failure to properly secure
Plaintiff's and Class Members' personally identifiable information
and personal health information and seeks redress for Defendant's
unlawful conduct and asserts claims for negligence and negligence
per se, breach of implied contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and
unjust enrichment.

As a result of Defendant's unreasonable and inadequate data
security practices, Plaintiff and Class members have suffered
numerous actual and concrete injuries and damages. Through this
complaint, Plaintiff seeks to remedy these harms on behalf of
herself and all similarly situated individuals whose private
information was accessed during the data breach, says the suit.

Located in Coeur d'Alene, ID, Kootenai Health, Inc. is a 330-bed
community-owned hospital providing medical services to patients in
north Idaho, eastern Washington, Montana and the Inland Northwest
at several facility locations. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         Jaren Wieland, Esq.
         MOONEY WIELAND WARREN
         512 W. Idaho St., Suite 103
         Boise, ID 83702
         Telephone: (208) 401-9219
         Facsimile: (208) 401-9218
         E-mail: jaren.wieland.service@mooneywieland.com

                 - and -

         Gary M. Klinger, Esq.
         MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN PLLC
         227 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2100
         Chicago, IL 60606
         Telephone: (866) 252-0878
         E-mail: gklinger@milberg.com

KORRES NATURAL: General Pretrial Management Entered in Tarr Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ELLEN TARR, v. KORRES
NATURAL PRODUCTS USA, INC., Case No. 1:24-cv-03435-DEH-BCM
(S.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge Barbara Moses entered an order regarding
general pretrial management as follows:

-- All pretrial motions and applications, including those related
to
    scheduling and discovery (but excluding motions to dismiss or
for
    judgment on the pleadings, for injunctive relief, for summary
    judgment, or for class certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23)

    must be made to Judge Moses and in compliance with this Court's

    Individual Practices in Civil Cases, available on the Court's
    website at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-barbara-moses.

-- Once a discovery schedule has been issued, all discovery must
be
    initiated in time to be concluded by the close of discovery set
by
    the Court.

-- Discovery applications, including letter-motions requesting
    discovery conferences, must be made promptly after the need for

    such an application arises and must comply with Local Civil
Rule
    37.2 and section 2(b) of Judge Moses's Individual Practices.

-- For motions other than discovery motions, pre-motion
conferences
    are not required, but may be requested where counsel believe
that
    an informal conference with the Court may obviate the need for
a
    motion or narrow the issues.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=nF1Mfw at no extra
charge.[CC]


KRAEMER NORTH: Court Certifies Class for Settlement Purposes
------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ROBERT BLACKWELL, on
behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. KRAEMER
NORTH AMERICA, LLC, Case No. 0:23-cv-01851-KMM-LIB (D. Minn.), the
Hon. Judge Katherine Menendez entered a preliminary approval order
as follows:

Class Certification for Settlement Purposes Only.

For settlement purposes only and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
23(b)(3) and (e), the Court certifies, solely for purposes of
effectuating the proposed Settlement, a Settlement Class in this
matter defined as follows:

    "All persons who were sent notification by Kraemer that their
    personal information and/or protected health information was or

    may have been compromised in the Data Incident."

The Settlement Class includes approximately 8,692 people.

The Settlement Class specifically excludes: (1) the judges
presiding over this Action, and members of their direct families;
(2) Kraemer, its subsidiaries, parent companies, successors,
predecessors, and any entity in which Kraemer or its parents have a
controlling interest and their current or former officers,
directors, and employees; and (3) Settlement Class Members who
submit a valid a Request for Exclusion prior to the Opt-Out
Deadline.
Class Representatives and Settlement Class Counsel:

ROBERT BLACKWELL is hereby provisionally designated and appointed
as the Class Representative. The Court provisionally finds that the
Class Representatives are similarly situated to absent Settlement
Class
Members and therefore typical of the Settlement Class and that they
will be an adequate Class representatives.

Summary of Deadlines.

The preliminarily approved Settlement shall be administered
according to its terms pending the Final Approval Hearing.

Kraemer North America is a full-service heavy civil contractor.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=GkAK2m at no extra
charge.[CC]

LINCARE INC: Garate Suit Removed to S.D. California
---------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Ignacio Garate, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. LINCARE, INC., a Delaware Corporation;
and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Case No. 37-2024-00014437-CU-OE-CTL was
removed from the Superior Court of the State of California, County
of San Diego, to the United States District Court for the Southern
District of California on April 29, 2024, and assigned Case No.
3:24-cv-00768-CAB-MSB.

The Complaint alleges 8 causes of action which Plaintiff pursues on
a class-wide basis: failure to pay all minimum wages; failure to
pay all overtime wages; meal period violations; rest period
violations; failure to pay all sick time; wage statement
violations; waiting time penalties; and unfair competition.[BN]

The Defendant is represented by:

          David L. Cheng, Esq
          Jason Shon, Esq
          FORD & HARRISON LLP
          350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2300
          Los Angeles, CA 90071
          Phone: 213-237-2400
          Facsimile: 213-237-2401
          Email: dcheng@fordharrison.com
                 jshon@fordharrison.com


LOANDEPOT.COM: Class Cert Hearing in Kearns Continued to June 21
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JEFFREY KEARNS,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
LOANDEPOT.COM, LLC., Case No. 8:22-cv-01217-JWH-JDE (C.D. Cal.),
the Hon. Judge John Holcomb entered an order granting stipulation
to continue hearing on the Plaintiff's motion for class
certification and the Defendant's motion to strike.

   1. The Parties' Joint Stipulation to Continue Hearing Date on
the
      Plaintiff's motion for class certification and on the
      Defendant's motion to strike is approved.

   2. The Plaintiff's opposition to the Defendant's motion to
strike
      is due on May 9, 2024.

   3. The Hearing on the Plaintiff's motion for class Certification

      and the Defendant's motion to strike is continued to June 21,

      2024, at 9:00 a.m.

LoanDepot is an Irvine, California-based nonbank holding company
which sells mortgage and non-mortgage lending products.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=rWDTMS at no extra
charge.[CC]

MAVERIK INC: Faces Dillard Suit Over PUMP Act Violations
--------------------------------------------------------
JADAH DILLARD, an individual on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MAVERIK, INC., a Utah corporation,
Defendant, Case No. 2:24-cv-00285 (D. Utah, April 19, 2024) accuses
the Defendant of violating the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and
the Providing Urgent Maternal Protections for Nursing Mothers Act.


Despite already being required to comply with the FLSA
breastfeeding requirements for more than a decade, the Defendant
still failed to provide a reasonable break time for Plaintiff to
express breast milk. In addition, Defendant deprived Plaintiff of
her rights as a nursing mother guaranteed by the PUMP Act to a
clean and secure space to pump milk for her infant child, says the
suit

Headquartered in Salt Lake City, UT, Maverik, Inc. is a chain of
over 380 convenience stores and gas stations that operates
throughout 12 western states as well as throughout the South and
Midwest with the addition of Kum & Go. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jason R. Hull, Esq.
          MARSHALL OLSON & HULL, PC
          Newhouse Building
          Ten Exchange Place, Suite 350
          Salt Lake City, UT 84111
          Telephone: (801) 456-7655
          E-mail: jhull@mohtrial.com

                  - and -

          Lisa R. Considine, Esq.
          Oren Faircloth, Esq.
          SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP
          745 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500
          New York, NY 10151
          Telephone: 212.532.1091
          E-mail: lconsidine@sirillp.com
                  ofaircloth@sirillp.com

MULTIPLAN INC: Allegiance Health Management Sues Over Price Fixing
------------------------------------------------------------------
Allegiance Health Management, Inc., et al., individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. MultiPlan, Inc., Health
Care Service Corporation, Aetna, Inc., Elevance Health, Inc.,
Centene Corporation, Cigna Group, UnitedHealth Group, Inc., Humana,
Inc., and Kaiser Permanente LLC, Case No. 1:24-cv-03223 (N.D. Ill.,
April 22, 2024) seeks damages over Defendants' alleged violations
of the Sherman Act.

The Plaintiff brings this action over Defendants' alleged
conspiracy to fix, suppress, and stabilize the reimbursement rates
for out-of-network healthcare services in the United States. The
anticompetitive scheme, carried out through Defendants' use of
shared "repricing" tools sold and promoted by MultiPlan, Inc.,
allegedly began on July 1, 2017 and has continued up to the
present, causing injury to Plaintiff and Class members, says the
suit.

Based in New York, NY, MultiPlan, Inc. provides healthcare cost
management solutions. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

        Robert A. Clifford, Esq.
        Shannon M. McNulty, Esq.
        CLIFFORD LAW OFFICES, P.C.     
        120 N. LaSalle Street, 36th Floor  
        Chicago, IL 60602
        Telephone: (312) 899-9090
        Facsimile: (312) 251-1160
        E-mail: rclifford@cliffordlaw.com
                SMM@cliffordlaw.com

                - and -
     
        Warren T. Burns, Esq.
        Quinn M. Burns, Esq.
        BURNS CHAREST LLP
        900 Jackson Street, Suite 500
        Dallas, TX 75202
        Telephone: (469) 458-9890
        E-mail: wburns@burnscharest.com
                qburns@burnscharest.com

                - and -
     
        Korey A. Nelson, Esq.
        Amanda K. Klevorn, Esq.
        Natalie Earles, Esq.
        BURNS CHAREST LLP
        365 Canal Street, Suite 1170
        New Orleans, LA 70130
        Telephone: (504) 799-2845
        E-mail: knelson@burnscharest.com
                aklevorn@burnscharest.com
                nearles@burnscharest.com

                - and -
     
        Matthew S. Tripolitsiotis, Esq.
        BURNS CHAREST LLP
        757 Third Ave., 20th Floor  
        New York, NY 10017
        Telephone: (469) 895-45505269
        E-mail: mtripolitsiotis@burnscharest.com

             - and -
     
        Christopher Cormier, Esq.
        Matthew Strauser, Esq.
        BURNS CHAREST LLP
        4725 Wisconsin Avenue NW, Suite 200   
        Washington, DC 20016
        Telephone: (202) 577-3977
        E-mail: ccormier@burnscharest.com
                mstrauser@burnscharest.com

                - and -
     
        Derrick G. Earles, Esq.
        LABORDE EARLES
        1901 Kaliste Saloom Road  
        Lafayette, LA 70508
        Telephone: (337) 223-9925
        E-mail: digger@onmyside.com

NATROL LLC: Filing for Class Cert Bid Due Dec. 19
-------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as VENUS YAMASAKI, v. NATROL,
LLC, Case No. 3:23-cv-00182-JD (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge James
Donato entered a scheduling order as follows:

                  Event                           Deadline

  Seek leave to add parties or amend           May 17, 2024
  Pleadings:

  Fact discovery cut-off:                      Sept. 13, 2024

  Expert disclosures:                          Oct. 11, 2024

  Rebuttal expert disclosures:                 Nov. 8, 2024

  Expert discovery cut-off:                    Dec. 6, 2024

  Last day to file motion for class            Dec. 19, 2024
  Certification:

  Class certification response:                Jan. 23, 2025

  Class certification reply:                   Feb. 13, 2025

  Class certification hearing:                 Feb. 27, 2025

  Last day to file dispositive and             April 24, 2025
  Daubert motions:

  Pretrial conference:                         Aug. 21, 2025
                                               At 1:30 p.m.

  Jury Trial:                                  Sept. 8, 2025
                                               at 9 a.m.

Natrol wholesales and distributes prescription, proprietary drugs,
and toiletries.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Wbclo5 at no extra
charge.[CC]

NEOGENOMICS INC: Continues to Defend Goldenberg Class Suit
----------------------------------------------------------
Neogenomics Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending March 31, 2024 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2024, that the Company
continues to defend itself from the Goldenberg shareholder class
suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District
of New York.

On December 16, 2022, a purported shareholder class action
captioned Daniel Goldenberg v. NeoGenomics, Inc., Douglas VanOort,
Mark Mallon, Kathryn McKenzie, and William Bonello was filed in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York,
naming the Company and certain of the Company's current and former
officers as defendants.

This lawsuit was filed by a stockholder who claims to be suing on
behalf of anyone who purchased or otherwise acquired the Company's
securities between February 27, 2020 and April 26, 2022.

The lawsuit alleges that material misrepresentations and/or
omissions of material fact were made in the Company's public
disclosures in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the
Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.

The alleged improper disclosures relate to statements regarding the
Company's menu of tests, business operations and compliance with
health care laws and regulations.

The plaintiff seeks unspecified monetary damages on behalf of the
putative class and an award of costs and expenses, including
attorney's fees and expert fees.

The Company believes that it has valid defenses to the claims
alleged in the lawsuits, but there is no guarantee that the Company
will prevail. At the time of filing the outcome of these matters
are not estimable or probable.

NeoGenomics Inc. is a cancer reference laboratory that provides
cancer testing and partnership programs to pathologists and
oncologists.[BN]


NESTLE USA: Partial Discovery Stayed Pending Class Cert Bid Ruling
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MARIE FALCONE,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
NESTLE USA, INC., Case No. 3:19-cv-00723-L-DEB (S.D. Cal.), the
Hon. Judge Daniel Butcher entered an order granting joint motion
for partial discovery stay pending ruling on class certification
motion and extension of discovery cutoff.

The Court stays discovery except for the following:

   (1) two Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) depositions on Defendant's
supply
       chain;

   (2) international discovery from non-party Nestle S.A.; and

   (3) Defendant's discovery relating to three expert declarations

       Plaintiff submitted on March 22, 2024.

Nestle produces and distributes nutritious food and beverage
products.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=qebuxR at no extra
charge.[CC]

NEW YORK COMMUNITY: Court Consolidates Lemm and Miskey Actions
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as DALE MISKEY, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. NEW YORK
COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC., THOMAS ROBERT CANGEMI and JOHN J. PINTO,
Case No. 24-CV-1118-NRM-JRC (E.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge James Cho
entered an order granting Boston Retirement's motion to consolidate
the Lemm and Miskey actions and appointing Boston Retirement as
lead plaintiff with Labaton as lead counsel.

The other pending motions for appointment of lead plaintiff and
approval of lead counsel are rendered moot.

Accordingly, Boston Retirement rebuts the presumption of Sand
Hollow's adequacy.

The Court, instead, grants Boston Retirement's motion for
appointment as lead plaintiff.

Boston Retirement suffered the second highest losses out of the
remaining movants, incurring $889,177 in losses during the class
period.

The Court concludes that Boston Retirement satisfies the
preliminary adequacy inquiry as well. Boston Retirement has no
discernible conflict of interest with the purported class, and it
has retained competent and experienced counsel.

Accordingly, the Court appoints Boston Retirement as lead
plaintiff. Appointment of Lead Counsel The PSLRA permits the lead
plaintiff to select and retain lead counsel, subject to the Court's
approval.

Boston Retirement has selected Labaton, an experienced law firm in
securities class action litigation. Sand Hollow does not challenge

Boston Retirement's selection. Based on the firm's submissions
relating to its background and experience, the Court finds that
this firm is qualified to serve as lead counsel.

On Feb. 6, 2024, Lemm brought this action against NYCB and two of
its C-suite officers.

On April 8, 2024, six investors timely moved to consolidate the
Lemm and Miskey actions and moved for appointment as lead plaintiff
under the PSLRA.

New York Community Bancorp is a bank holding company, which engages
in the provision of multi-family loans on non-luxury rent-regulated
buildings.

A copy of the Court's memorandum and order dated May 7, 2024, is
available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=3SCrCz
at no extra charge.[CC]

PACIFIC GUARDIAN LIFE: Hardy Files Suit in D. Hawaii
----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Pacific Guardian Life
Insurance Company, Ltd. The case is styled as Christopher Hardy,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v.
Pacific Guardian Life Insurance Company, Ltd., Case No.
1:24-cv-00195-DKW-RT (D. Haw., April 29, 2024).

The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury.

Pacific Guardian Life -- https://www.pacificguardian.com/ -- is the
largest domestic life and disability insurer in Hawaii.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Margery S. Bronster, Esq.
          Noelle Emi Chan, Esq.
          Robert M. Hatch, Esq.
          BRONSTER FUJICHAKU ROBBINS
          Pauahi Tower
          1003 Bishop St, Ste 2300
          Honolulu, HI 96813
          Phone: (808) 524-5644
          Fax: 599-1881
          Email: mbronster@bfrhawaii.com
                 nchan@bfrhawaii.com
                 rhatch@bfrhawaii.com


PINNACLE GROUP: Fernandez Wins Conditional Status Bid
-----------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Edgar Fernandez, on behalf
of himself, individually, and on behalf of all others
similarly-situated, v. Pinnacle Group NY LLC and Joel Wiener,
individually, Case No. 1:21-cv-10702-AT-VF (S.D.N.Y.), the Hon.
Judge Analisa Torres entered an order granting the Plaintiff's
motion for conditional certification.

  -- By May 21, 2024, the Defendants shall produce to the
Plaintiffs a
     computer-readable list of all names, addresses, telephone
     numbers, and e-mail addresses for all potential opt-in
     plaintiffs, along with their primary languages(s) spoken and
     their approximate dates of employment.

  -- The Defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied.

Pinnacle provides real estate services.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=hvTu5A at no extra
charge.[CC]

RECKITT BENCKISER: Riccio Suit Transferred to E.D. New York
-----------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Rose Riccio, on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated v. RECKITT BENCKISER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Case
No. 1:23-cv-13879 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for
the Northern District of Illinois, to the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of New York on April 29, 2024.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:24-cv-03136-BMC to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Fraud or Truth-In-Lending for
Account Receivable.

Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Inc. -- https://www.reckitt.com/
-- is a manufacturer of drugs and pharmaceuticals.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Gary M. Klinger, Esq.
          MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC
          227 W. Monroe St., Ste. 2100
          Chicago, IL 60606
          Phone: (866) 252-0878
          Email: gklinger@milberg.com

               - and -

          Nick Suciu III, Esq.
          MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC
          6905 Telegraph Rd., Suite 115
          Bloomfield Hills, MI 48301
          Phone: (313) 303-3472
          Email: nsuciu@milberg.com

               - and -

          Jeff Ostrow, Esq.
          Jonathan M. Streisfeld, Esq.
          Kristen Lake Cardoso, Esq.
          Daniel Tropin, Esq.
          KOPELOWITZ OSTROW P.A.
          One West Las Olas Blvd., Suite 500
          Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
          Phone: (954) 525-4100
          Email: ostrow@kolawyers.com
                 streisfeld@kolawyers.com
                 cardoso@kolawyers.com
                 tropin@kolawyers.com

               - and -

          Melissa S. Weiner, Esq.
          Ryan J. Gott, Esq.
          PEARSON WARSHAW, LLP
          328 Barry Avenue South, Suite 200
          Wayzata, MN 55391
          Phone: (612) 389-0600
          Email: mweiner@pwfirm.com
                 rgott@pwfirm.com

               - and -

          Erin Ruben, Esq.
          MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN PLLC
          900 W. Morgan Street
          Raleigh, NC 27603
          Phone: (919) 600-5000
          Email: eruben@milberg.com

               - and -

          J. Hunter Bryson, Esq.
          MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC
          405 E 50th Street
          New York, NY 10022
          Phone: (630) 796-0903
          Email: hbryson@milberg.com

               - and -

          Karl Amelchenko, Esq.
          MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC
          900 W. Morgan Street
          Raleigh, NC 27603
          Phone: (919) 600-5000
          Email: kamelchenko@milberg.com

               - and -

          Jimmy Mintz, Esq.
          MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC
          201 Sevilla Ave., 2nd Floor
          Coral Gables, FL 33134
          Phone: (786) 876-8200
          Email: jmintz@milberg.com


RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE: Dietel Sues Over Misleading Statements
---------------------------------------------------------
GLENN DIETEL, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated, Plaintiff v. RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE, INC., ROBERT J. SCARINGE,
and CLAIRE MCDONOUGH, Defendants, Case No. 2:24-cv-03269 (C.D.
Cal., April 19, 2024) seeks to recover damages caused by
Defendants' violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue
remedies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, against the Company and certain of its
top officials.

Plaintiff Dietel brings this federal securities class action on
behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than
Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired Rivian securities
between March 1, 2023 and February 21, 2024, both dates inclusive.
Throughout the said period, Defendants made false and/or misleading
statements and/or failed to disclose that Rivian had overstated
demand for its products, as well as its ability to withstand
negative, near-term macroeconomic impacts. The Defendants also
failed to disclose that Rivian's business was experiencing reduced
demand and increased customer cancellations as a result of, among
other things, high interest rates. As a result of the Defendants'
wrongful acts and omissions, and the precipitous decline in the
market value of the Company's securities, Plaintiff and other Class
members have suffered significant losses and damages, the suit
alleges.

Headquartered in Irvine, CA, Rivian designs, develops,
manufactures, and sells electric vehicles and accessories. Its
Class A common stock trades in an efficient market on the Nasdaq
Stock Market under the ticker symbol "RIVN". [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         Jennifer Pafiti, Esq.
         POMERANTZ LLP
         1100 Glendon Avenue, 15th Floor
         Los Angeles, CA 90024
         Telephone: (310) 405-7190
         E-mail: jpafiti@pomlaw.com

                 - and -

         Peretz Bronstein, Esq.
         BRONSTEIN, GEWIRTZ & GROSSMAN, LLC
         60 East 42nd Street, Suite 4600
         New York, NY 10165
         Telephone: (212) 697-6484
         Facsimile: (212) 697-7296
         E-mail: peretz@bgandg.com

RPM INTERNATIONAL: J&L Imperium Suit Transferred to S.D. New York
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as J&L Imperium Industries, LLC, on behalf of
itself and all others similarly situated v. RPM INTERNATIONAL INC.;
SIKA AG; SIKA CORPORATION; CHRYSO, INC.; GCP APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.; COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN S.A.; SAINT-GOBAIN CORPORATION,
MASTER BUILDERS SOLUTIONS ADMIXTURES U.S., LLC; MASTER BUILDERS
SOLUTIONS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH; CINVEN LTD.; CINVEN, INC.; THE EUCLID
CHEMICAL COMPANY; AND DOES 1-10, Case No. 2:24-cv-00545 was
transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Pennsylvania, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York on April 29, 2024.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:24-cv-03236-LJL to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Anti-Trust for Antitrust Litigation
(Monopolizing Trade).

RPM International Inc. -- https://www.rpminc.com/ -- is a
multinational holding company with subsidiaries that manufacture
high-performance coatings, sealants, and specialty chemicals,
primarily for maintenance, repair and improvement
applications.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Michael L. Roberts, Esq.
          Erich P. Schork, Esq.
          Sarah E. DeLoach, Esq.
          ROBERTS LAW FIRM US, PC
          1920 McKinney Ave, Suite 700
          Dallas, TX 75201
          Phone: (501) 821-5575
          Fax: (501) 821-4474
          Email: mikeroberts@robertslawfirm.us
                 erichschork@robertslawfirm.us
                 sarahdeloach@robertslawfirm.us

               - and -

          Joseph C. Kohn, Esq.
          William E. Hoese, Esq.
          KOHN, SWIFT & GRAF, P.C.
          1600 Market Street, Suite 2500
          Philadelphia, PA 19103
          Phone: (215) 238-1700
          Fax (215) 238-1968
          Email: jkohn@kohnswift.com
                 whoese@kohnswift.com


S & C BRIDAL: Karim Sues over Blind-Inaccessible Website Design
---------------------------------------------------------------
JESSICA KARIM, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. S & C Bridal, LLC, Defendant, Case No.
1:24-cv-02999-AT (S.D.N.Y., April 19, 2024), arises from
Defendant's failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate
their website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by
Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons in violation
of Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Despite readily available accessible technology, the Defendant has
chosen to rely on an exclusively visual interface that only those
sighted customers can independently browse, select, and buy online
without the assistance of others. Moreover, Defendant is violating
basic equal access requirements under both state and federal law by
failing to make the website accessible to blind persons, says the
suit.

Headquartered in Broadway, NY, S & C Bridal, LLC, is a Delaware
limited liability company that owns and operates the website known
as Usangels.com, which provides consumers with access to an array
of goods and services, including, the ability to view dresses for
special events, sleepwear, and accessories including veils and
headbands. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         Gabriel A. Levy, Esq.
         GABRIEL A. LEVY, P.C.
         1129 Northern Blvd, Suite 404
         Manhasset, NY 11030
         Telephone: (347) 941-4715
         E-mail: Glevyfirm@gmail.com

SANDUSKY, OH: Seeks More Time for Class Cert Response
-----------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as BLAKE McGORY, et. al., v.
CITY OF SANDUSKY, Case No. 3:24-cv-00567-JJH (N.D. Ohio), the
Defendant asks the Court to enter an order granting a month-long
extension of time in which to respond to the plaintiffs' motion for
class certification.

As grounds for the motion counsel indicates that Sandusky's civil
law department has recently lost one of its two attorneys due to
her accepting employment at a law firm. The Law Director has been
unable to devote sufficient time to complete the city's response.
Another recent law graduate has accepted the position to replace
her but will not start until May 21, 2024. The class certification
matter has also been referred to the city's insurance company for a
legal defense. The city has also been gathering data to support its
arguments that the numerosity and similarly situated requirements
of a class action have not been met in this matter.

This motion is not being made for the purpose of delay but is
necessary given the extraordinary demands placed upon this small
office and the complexity of the matter at hand.

Sandusky is an Ohio city on the shores of Lake Erie. It's known for
its family attractions, including water, wildlife and amusement
parks.

A copy of the Defendant's motion dated May 7, 2024, is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=3NPilN at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Defendant is represented by:

          L. Stewart Hastings, Jr., Esq.


          Director of Law
          City of Sandusky
          240 Columbus Ave.
          Sandusky, OH 44870
          Telephone: (419) 627-5729
          E-mail: shastings@cityofsandusky.com

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY: Seeks Dismissal of Consolidated Securities Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Seagate Technology Holdings Public Limited Company disclosed in its
Form 10-Q report for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2024,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26,
2024, that it is facing consolidated case captioned "In re Seagate
Technology Holdings PLC Securities Litigation." A hearing regarding
Seagate's motion to dismiss occurred on March 26, 2024.

A putative class action lawsuit alleging violations of the federal
securities laws, "UA Local 38 Defined Contribution Pension Plan, et
al. v. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC, et al.," was filed on July
10, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California against Seagate Technology Holdings plc, Dr. William D.
Mosley, and Gianluca Romano.

The complaint alleges that it is a securities class action on
behalf of all purchasers of Seagate common stock between September
15, 2020 and October 25, 2022, inclusive, and asserts claims under
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Rule 10b5-1. The complaint seeks unspecified monetary damages and
other relief.

The case was consolidated with another case on September 25, 2023.
An amended complaint was filed on October 19, 2023.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC and its subsidiaries is a provider
of data storage technology and infrastructure solutions. Its
principal products are hard disk drives, commonly referred to as
disk drives, hard drives or HDDs.


SEAWORLD PARKS: Coppel Wins Bid for Class Certification
--------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as FERNANDO COPPEL et al.,
individually and as a representative of a Putative Class of
Participants and Beneficiaries on behalf of the SWBG, LLC, 401(K)
PLAN, f/k/a "SEAWORLD PARKS AND ENTERTAINMENT 401(K) PLAN," v.
SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC. et al., Case No.
3:21-cv-01430-RSH-DDL (S.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Robert Huie
entered an order:

-- granting Defendants' ex parte motion for leave to file a notice
of
    supplemental authority,

-- granting Plaintiffs' motion for class certification, and

-- certifying the following class and subclasses:

    a. "All participants in or beneficiaries of the SeaWorld Parks
and
       Entertainment 401(K) PLAN, and the SWBG, LLC 401(K) PLAN
from
       Aug. 10, 2015, through the date of judgment, excluding the
       Defendants and members of the Defendant Boards and
Committees."

    i. The MassMutual Subclass:

       "All class members who participated in the Plan while Mass
       Mutual was the Plan's recordkeeper."

   ii. The Prudential Subclass:

       "All class members who participated in the Plan while
       Prudential was the Plan's recordkeeper."

  iii. The Injunctive Relief Subclass:

       "All class members who currently participate in the Plan."

-- appointing named Plaintiffs Coppel, Martinez, Mitchell,
    Uriostegui, and Usselman as class representatives; and
Christina
    A. Humphrey, Robert N. Fisher, James A. Clark, and Renee Parras

    Ortega as co-lead class counsel.

On March 1, 2010, SeaWorld began offering its employees a defined
contribution 401(k) retirement savings plan, the SWBG, LLC 401(k)
Plan, formerly known as the SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment 401(k)
Plan.

The Plaintiffs originally filed this putative class action on Aug.
9, 2021. The Plaintiffs bring this action under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), on behalf of the Plan,
individually and as representatives of participants and
beneficiaries of the Plan,
against the Defendant.

SeaWorld is a marine-life theme park.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 8, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=40QzBc at no extra
charge.[CC]

SELECTQUOTE AUTO: Davis Bid to Compel Discovery Responses Tossed
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as BRADLEY P. DAVIS, v.
SELECTQUOTE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC, Case No.
3:22-cv-00185-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C.), the Hon. Judge David Keesler
entered an order denying the Plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery
responses from the Defendant.

The parties shall jointly file proposed revised case deadlines on
or before May 15, 2024

The undersigned finds that Defendant's discovery responses are
relevant and proportional to the needs of the case, and therefore,
further production should not be compelled.

The Plaintiff alleges that on Jan. 15, 2021, he "applied for the
position of senior sales agent with Defendant at its Charlotte,
North Carolina location." "Following his successful interview, the
Plaintiff was extended a conditional offer of employment from the
Defendant on Jan. 21, 2021."

As part of his questionnaire responses, the Plaintiff disclosed
that he had "a misdemeanor conviction for possession of marijuana
in 2006, as well as a conviction for being an accomplice to common
law battery in 2007."

The Plaintiff argues that Defendant's employment policy "had and
continues to have a disparate impact upon African-Americans in
violation of" Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

On June 22, 2021, the Plaintiff filed a "Charge of Discrimination"
with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC").

The Plaintiff defines the class that he seeks to represent as:

      "All African-American individuals who were not provided
formal
      offers of employment for insurance sales positions based upon

      their conviction records at any time between 300 days prior
to
      Jan. 21, 2021 until the damages phase of trial in this
matter."

SelectQuote is an insurance company that offers auto and home
insurance services.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=ezHFYG at no extra
charge.[CC]

SIKA AG: Cal Prime Suit Transferred to S.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Cal Prime, Inc., on behalf of itself and all
others similarly situated v. SIKA AG; SIKA CORPORATION; CHRYSO,
INC.; GCP APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN
S.A.; SAINT GOBAIN NORTH AMERICA; MASTER BUILDERS SOLUTIONS
ADMIXTURES U.S., LLC; MASTER BUILDERS SOLUTIONS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH;
CINVEN LTD.; CINVEN, INC.; THE EUCLID CHEMICAL COMPANY; RPM
INTERNATIONAL INC.; AND JOHN DOES 1-10, Case No. 1:24-cv-00365 was
transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of California, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District
of New York on April 29, 2024.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:24-cv-03256-LJL to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Anti-Trust for the Antitrust
Litigation.

Sika AG -- https://www.sika.com/en/ -- is a Swiss multinational
specialty chemical company that supplies to the building sector and
motor vehicle industry, headquartered in Baar, Switzerland.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jon A. Tostrud, Esq.
          TOSTRUD LAW GROUP, PC
          1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Phone: 310/278-2600
          Facsimile: 310/278-2640
          Email: jtostrud@tostrudlaw.com


SIKA AG: D'Onofrio General Suit Transferred to S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp., on behalf
of itself and all others similarly situated v. SIKA AG; SIKA
CORPORATION; CHRYSO, INC.; GCP APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;
COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN S.A.; SAINT GOBAIN NORTH AMERICA; MASTER
BUILDERS SOLUTIONS ADMIXTURES U.S., LLC; MASTER BUILDERS SOLUTIONS
DEUTSCHLAND GMBH; CINVEN LTD.; CINVEN, INC.; THE EUCLID CHEMICAL
COMPANY; RPM INTERNATIONAL INC.; AND JOHN DOES 1-10, Case No.
1:24-cv-00783 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of New York, to the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York on April 29, 2024.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:24-cv-03255-LJL to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Anti-Trust for the Sherman-Clayton
Act.

Sika AG -- https://www.sika.com/en/ -- is a Swiss multinational
specialty chemical company that supplies to the building sector and
motor vehicle industry, headquartered in Baar, Switzerland.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Fred T. Isquith, Sr., Esq.
          ISQUITH LAW PLLC
          103 East 84th Street
          New York, NY 10028
          Phone: 718-775-6478
          Email: isquithlaw@gmail.com

               - and -

          Thomas H. Burt, Esq.
          Lillian R. Grinnell, Esq.
          WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
          270 Madison Avenue, 9th Floor
          New York, NY 10016
          Phone: (212) 545-4600
          Fax: (212) 686-1094
          Email: burt@whafh.com
                 grinnell@whafh.com

               - and -

          Justin S. Nematzadeh, Esq.
          NEMATZADEH PLLC
          Founder & Managing Member
          101 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 909
          New York, NY 10013
          Phone: (646) 799-6729


SIKA AG: H&S Ready Mix Suit Transferred to S.D. New York
--------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as H&S Ready Mix, Inc., on behalf of itself and all
others similarly situated v. SIKA AG; SIKA CORPORATION; CHRYSO,
INC.; GCP APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN
S.A.; SAINT-GOBAIN CORPORATION, MASTER BUILDERS SOLUTIONS
ADMIXTURES U.S., LLC; MASTER BUILDERS SOLUTIONS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH;
CINVEN LTD.; CINVEN, INC.; THE EUCLID CHEMICAL COMPANY; RPM
INTERNATIONAL INC.; AND DOES 1-10, Case No. 2:24-cv-00164 was
transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Pennsylvania, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York on April 29, 2024.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:24-cv-03246-LJL to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Anti-Trust for Antitrust Litigation
(Monopolizing Trade).

Sika AG -- https://www.sika.com/en/ -- is a Swiss multinational
specialty chemical company that supplies to the building sector and
motor vehicle industry, headquartered in Baar, Switzerland.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Dianne M. Nast, Esq.
          Daniel N. Gallucci, Esq.
          Michele S. Burkholder, Esq.
          NASTLAW LLC
          1101 Market Street, Suite 2801
          Philadelphia, PA 19107
          Phone: (215) 923-9300
          Fax: (215) 923-9302
          Email: dnast@nastlaw.com
                 dgallucci@nastlaw.com
                 mburkholder@nastlaw.com

               - and -

          Daniel E. Gustafson, Esq.
          Daniel C. Hedlund, Esq.
          Michelle J. Looby, Esq.
          Matt Jacobs, Esq.
          GUSTAFSON GLUEK PLLC
          Canadian Pacific Plaza
          120 So. Sixth Street, Suite 2600
          Minneapolis, MN 55402
          Phone: (612) 333-8844
          Fax: (612) 339-6622
          Email: dgustafson@gustafsongluek.com
                 dhedlund@gustafsongluek.com
                 mlooby@gustafsongluek.com
                 mjacobs@gustafsongluek.com

               - and -

          Christopher V. Le, Esq.
          Joshua Q. Callister, Esq.
          BOIESBATTIN LLP
          4041 University Drive, 5th Floor
          Fairfax, VA 22030
          Phone: (703) 764-8700
          Fax: (703) 764-8704
          Email: cle@boiesbattin.com
                 jcallister@boiesbattin.com

               - and -

          Simon B. Paris, Esq.
          Patrick Howard, Esq.
          SALTZ, MONGELUZZI, & BENDESKY, P.C.
          One Liberty Place, 52nd Floor
          1650 Market Street
          Philadelphia, PA 19103
          Phone: (215) 575-3985
          Email: sparis@smbb.com
                 phoward@smbb.com

               - and -

          Michael J. Boni, Esq.
          Joshua D. Snyder, Esq.
          BONI, ZACK & SNYDER LLC
          15 St. Asaphs Road
          Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
          Phone: 610-822-0200
          Email: mboni@bonizack.com
                 jsnyder@bonizack.com

               - and -

          David M. Cialkowski, Esq.
          Ian F. McFarland, Esq.
          Zachary J. Freese, Esq.
          ZIMMERMAN REED LLP
          1100 IDS Center
          80 S. 8th St.
          Minneapolis, MN 55402
          Phone: (612) 341-0400
          Fax: (612) 341-0844
          Email: david.cialkowski@zimmreed.com
                 ian.mcfarland@zimmreed.com
                 zachary.freese@zimmreed.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Jeremy Heep, Esq.
          Julian Newton Weiss, Esq.
          PEPPER, HAMILTON, L.L.P.
          3000 Two Logan Square
          18th and Arch Streets
          Philadelphia, PA 19103
          Phone: (215) 981-4000

               - and -

          Mark H. Hamer, Esq.
          BAKER MCKENZIE
          815 Connecticut Avenue NW
          Washington, DC 20006
          Phone: (202) 452-7077

               - and -

          David Frazier, Esq.
          Jennifer L. Giordano, Esq.
          Marguerite M. Sullivan, Esq.
          LATHAM & WATKINS LLP (DC)
          555 Eleventh Street, Nw, Suite 1000
          Washington, DC 20004
          Phone: (202) 637-2200
          Fax: (202) 637-2201
          Email: david.frazier@lw.com

               - and -

          Anne Salomon, Esq.
          Christa C. Cottrell, Esq.
          Daniel E. Laytin, Esq.
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          300 North Lasalle
          Chicago, IL 60654
          Phone: (312) 862-3092
          Email: anne.salomon@kirkland.com
                 ccottrell@kirkland.com

               - and -

          Heather P. Lamberg, Esq.
          Bruce McCulloch, Esq.
          FRESHFIELDS BRUCKHAUS DERINGER US LLP
          700 13th Street NW, Ste 10th Floor
          Washington D.C., DC 20005
          Phone: (202) 777-4500
          Email: bruce.mcculloch@freshfields.com

               - and -

          Anna E. Sanders, Esq.
          Gerald E. Burns, Esq.
          BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
          Two Liberty Place
          50 S. 16th Street, Suite 3200
          Philadelphia, PA 19102
          Phone: (215) 665-3957
          Email: anna.sanders@bipc.com

               - and -

          Abram J. Ellis, Esq.
          SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
          1155 F Street NW
          Washington, DC 20004
          Phone: (202) 636-5579

               - and -

          Andrew P. Fishkin, Esq.
          FISHKIN LUCKS LLP
          One Gateway Center, Suite 1150
          Newark, NJ 07102
          Phone: (973) 536-2800
          Fax: (973) 679-4435
          Email: afishkin@fishkinlucks.com

               - and -

          Joshua Hazan, Esq.
          U.S. District Court
          500 Pearl Street
          New York, NY 10007
          Phone: (248) 506-3234
          Email: joshua.hazan@stblaw.com

               - and -

          Peter Guryan, Esq.
          SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
          425 Lexington Ave
          New York, NY 10017
          Phone: (212) 455-2750
          Email: peter.guryan@stblaw.com

               - and -

          Zachary Winthrop Silverman, Esq.
          FISHKIN LUCKS LLP
          One Gateway Center, Suite 1150
          Newark, NJ 07102
          Phone: (973) 536-2800
          Fax: (973) 679-4435
          Email: zsilverman@fishkinlucks.com


SIKA AG: Park Construction Suit Transferred to S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Park Construction Company, on behalf of itself
and all others similarly situated v. SIKA AG; SIKA CORPORATION;
CHRYSO, INC.; GCP APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; COMPAGNIE DE
SAINT-GOBAIN S.A.; SAINT GOBAIN NORTH AMERICA; MASTER BUILDERS
SOLUTIONS ADMIXTURES U.S., LLC; MASTER BUILDERS SOLUTIONS
DEUTSCHLAND GMBH; CINVEN LTD.; CINVEN, INC.; THE EUCLID CHEMICAL
COMPANY; RPM INTERNATIONAL INC.; AND JOHN DOES 1-10, Case No.
0:24-cv-00441 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the
District of Minnesota, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York on April 29, 2024.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:24-cv-03224-LJL to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Anti-Trust for the Antitrust
Litigation.

Sika AG -- https://www.sika.com/en/ -- is a Swiss multinational
specialty chemical company that supplies to the building sector and
motor vehicle industry, headquartered in Baar, Switzerland.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Shawn M. Raiter, Esq.
          Larson King, LLP
          30 E 7th St Ste 2800
          St Paul, MN 55101-4922
          Phone: (651) 312-6500
          Fax: (651) 312-6615


SIKA AG: Vera Construction Suit Transferred to S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Vera Construction, L.L.C., individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. SIKA AG; SIKA
CORPORATION; CHRYSO, INC.; GCP APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;
COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN S.A.; SAINT GOBAIN NORTH AMERICA; MASTER
BUILDERS SOLUTIONS ADMIXTURES U.S., LLC; MASTER BUILDERS SOLUTIONS
DEUTSCHLAND GMBH; CINVEN LTD.; CINVEN, INC.; THE EUCLID CHEMICAL
COMPANY; RPM INTERNATIONAL INC.; AND JOHN DOES 1-10, Case No.
2:23-cv-05135 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania, to the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New York on April 29, 2024.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:24-cv-03244-LJL to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Anti-Trust for Antitrust Litigation
(Monopolizing Trade).

Sika AG -- https://www.sika.com/en/ -- is a Swiss multinational
specialty chemical company that supplies to the building sector and
motor vehicle industry, headquartered in Baar, Switzerland.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Heidi M. Silton, Esq.
          Jessica N. Servais, Esq.
          Joseph C. Bourne, esq.
          LOCKRIDGE, GRINDAL, NAUEN P.L.L.P.
          100 Washington Ave. South, Ste. 2200
          Mpls, MN 55401-2179
          Phone: (612) 596-4092
          Fax: (612) 339-0981
          Email: hmsilton@locklaw.com
                 jnservais@locklaw.com
                 jcbourne@locklaw.com

               - and -

          Charles J. Kocher, Esq.
          MCOMBER, MCOMBER AND LUBER
          50 Lake Center Drive, Suite 400
          Marlton, NJ 08053
          Phone: (856) 985-9800

The Defendants are represented by:

          Jeremy Heep, Esq.
          Julian Newton Weiss, Esq.
          PEPPER, HAMILTON, L.L.P.
          3000 Two Logan Square
          18th and Arch Streets
          Philadelphia, PA 19103
          Phone: (215) 981-4000

               - and -

          Mark H. Hamer, Esq.
          BAKER MCKENZIE
          815 Connecticut Avenue NW
          Washington, DC 20006
          Phone: (202) 452-7077

               - and -

          Anne Salomon, Esq.
          Christa C. Cottrell, Esq.
          Daniel E. Laytin, Esq.
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          300 North Lasalle
          Chicago, IL 60654
          Phone: (312) 862-3092
          Email: anne.salomon@kirkland.com
                 ccottrell@kirkland.com

               - and -

          Heather P. Lamberg, Esq.
          Bruce McCulloch, Esq.
          FRESHFIELDS BRUCKHAUS DERINGER US LLP
          700 13th Street NW, Ste 10th Floor
          Washington D.C., DC 20005
          Phone: (202) 777-4500
          Email: bruce.mcculloch@freshfields.com

               - and -

          Anna E. Sanders, Esq.
          Gerald E. Burns, Esq.
          BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
          Two Liberty Place
          50 S. 16th Street, Suite 3200
          Philadelphia, PA 19102
          Phone: (215) 665-3957
          Email: anna.sanders@bipc.com

               - and -

          Abram J. Ellis, Esq.
          SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
          1155 F Street NW
          Washington, DC 20004
          Phone: (202) 636-5579

               - and -

          Andrew P. Fishkin, Esq.
          FISHKIN LUCKS LLP
          One Gateway Center, Suite 1150
          Newark, NJ 07102
          Phone: (973) 536-2800
          Fax: (973) 679-4435
          Email: afishkin@fishkinlucks.com

               - and -

          Joshua Hazan, Esq.
          U.S. District Court
          500 Pearl Street
          New York, NY 10007
          Phone: (248) 506-3234
          Email: joshua.hazan@stblaw.com

               - and -

          Peter Guryan, Esq.
          SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
          425 Lexington Ave
          New York, NY 10017
          Phone: (212) 455-2750
          Email: peter.guryan@stblaw.com

               - and -

          Zachary Winthrop Silverman, Esq.
          FISHKIN LUCKS LLP
          One Gateway Center, Suite 1150
          Newark, NJ 07102
          Phone: (973) 536-2800
          Fax: (973) 679-4435
          Email: zsilverman@fishkinlucks.com


SOUTHWEST AIRLINES: Seeks More Time to File Response
----------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ADRIAN BOMBIN and SAMANTHA
ROOD, v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., Case No. 5:20-cv-01883-JMG (E.D.
Pa.), the Defendant asks the Court to enter an order granting its
unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to the
Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration of order denying class
certification.

On April 16, 2024, the Parties filed a Joint Status Report pursuant
to this Court's April 12, 2023 order that the Parties provide "(1)
information regarding any follow up to the notice to clarify
certain evidence provided to the Court on March 13, 2024, and (2)
information regarding whether a Motion for Reconsideration of
Denial of Class Certification is anticipated."

In the Joint Status Report, the parties agreed that Plaintiffs
would file their Motion for Reconsideration by April 30, 2024, and
that Southwest would file its response by May 23, 2024.

The Plaintiffs filed the Motion to Reconsider on April 30, 2024.
Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), Southwest's response would be due on
May 14, 2024.

Southwest seeks an extension, pursuant to the agreement in the
Joint Status Report, to May 23, 2024, to file its response to the
Motion for Reconsideration.

The extension is not being sought for delay but to permit Southwest
to adequately respond to the Motion.  

Southwest Airlines is a major airline in the United States that
operates on a low-cost carrier model.

A copy of the Defendant's motion dated May 8, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=YA2sd1 at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Defendant is represented by:

          James V. Leito IV, Esq.
          Michael A. Swartzendruber, Esq.
          NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP
          2200 Ross Ave., Suite 3600
          Dallas, TX 75201-7932
          Telephone: (214) 855-8000
          Facsimile: (214) 855-8200
          E-mail: james.leito@nortonrosefulbright.com
                  michael.swartzendruber@nortonrosefulbright.com

                - and -

          M. Roy Goldberg, Esq.
          Todd A. Noteboom, Esq.
          STINSON LLP
          1775 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 800
          Washington, DC 20006
          Telephone: (202) 728-3005
          E-mail: Roy.goldberg@stinson.com
                  Todd.noteboom@stinson.com

                - and -

          James T. Moughan, Esq.
          BENNETT BRICKLIN & SALTZBURG LLC
          Centre Square West Tower, 32nd Floor
          1500 Market Street
          Philadelphia, PA 19102
          Telephone:(215) 665-3402
          Facsimile: (215) 561-6661
          E-mail: moughan@bbs-law.com

SPECIALIZED LOAN: Fails to Pay Proper Overtime Wages, Butler Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TYZHIMA BUTLER, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC, Case No. 1:24-cv-01087
(D. Colo., April 22, 2024) seeks damages for Defendant's alleged
failure to pay overtime wages.

The Plaintiff was employed by Defendant as an hourly-paid,
non-exempt remote call center agent from approximately September
2021 until November 2023. The Plaintiff alleges that throughout her
employment, Defendant failed to compensate her and all other
similarly situated employees for all hours worked, including
overtime hours worked at the appropriate overtime rate. Agents,
including Plaintiff, were allegedly required by Defendant to
perform pre- and mid-shift off-the-clock tasks but without
compensation. Additionally, the Defendant failed to include all
remuneration in its agents' overtime computations. The Plaintiff
claims that such practices are in violation of the Fair Labor
Standards Act and the Arizona Wage Act.

Headquartered in Greenwood Village, CO, Specialized Loan Servicing,
LLC is a third-party mortgage service provider. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

        Kevin J. Stoops, Esq.
        Albert J. Asciutto, Esq.
        SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C     
        One Towne Square, 17th Floor
        Southfield, MI 48076
        Telephone: (248) 355-0300
        E-mail: kstoops@sommerspc.com
                aasciutto@sommerspc.com

STUBHUB INC: Hong Sues Over Deceptive Ticket Pricing Practices
--------------------------------------------------------------
BRIAN HONG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. STUBHUB, INC, Case No. 2:24-cv-03318 (C.D. Cal., April
22, 2024) alleges the Defendant of deceptive business practices, in
violation of various California laws.

This action arises from Defendant's alleged practice of
misrepresenting the prices of tickets sold through its online
platform, StubHub.com. When using the platform, customers are given
the option to view the tickets' prices with estimated fees via an
"Estimated Fees Filter" before making a purchase. However, it was
discovered that Defendant consistently and systematically
understates the estimated fees it charges users according to a
strict computer algorithm. Specifically, Defendant invariably
understates the total cost of every single ticket by between $2 and
$3 per ticket. Customers only become aware of the price increases
at the final checkout screen and are forced to complete their
purchase as quickly as possible to avoid being kicked out and
redirected to the ticket selection page.

The Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and all others who purchased a
ticket on StubHub.com using the Estimated Fees Filter, asserts
claims for violation of California's Ticket Sale Law, California's
Unfair Competition Law, Consumers Legal Remedies Act, and
California's False Advertising Law, as well as claims for fraud and
unjust enrichment.

StubHub is an American ticket exchange and resale company based in
Draper, UT. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

        L. Timothy Fisher, Esq.
        Stefan Bogdanovich, Esq.
        Emily A. Horne, Esq.
        BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.      
        1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940  
        Walnut Creek, CA 94596
        Telephone: (925) 300-4455
        Facsimile: (925) 407-2700
        E-mail: ltfisher@bursor.com
                sbogdanovich@bursor.com
                ehorne@bursor.com

T-MOBILE US: Borzenkova Seeks Damages for Biometric Law Violations
------------------------------------------------------------------
VALERIIA BORZENKOVA v. T-MOBILE US, INC, Case No. 1:24-cv-03070
(S.D.N.Y., April 22, 2024) is a class action accusing the Defendant
of improperly using consumers' biometric data.

The Plaintiff brings this action over Defendant's alleged unlawful
use of biometric data it collects from consumers, including
Plaintiff. Allegedly, Defendant's use of facial recognition, eye
scan, and voiceprint technology systems to protect its stores from
theft and fraud is "profit-motivated" and violates consumers'
privacy rights. The Plaintiff claims that she did not provide
consent to Defendant to use her biometric data for trade purposes
and that Defendant's conduct is in violation of the New York City
Biometric Law.  

T-Mobile US, Inc. is a mobile phone service provider based in
Bellevue, WA. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

        Anna Menkova, Esq.
        Adam Pollock, Esq.
        POLLOCK COHEN LLP     
        111 Broadway, Suite 1804
        New York, NY 10006
        Telephone: (212) 337-5361
        E-mail: anna@pollockcohen.com
                adam@pollockcohen.com

TAKEDA PHARMA: Filing of Class Cert Bid Due June 14
---------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Premera Blue Cross v.
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, et al., Case No.
1:23-cv-12918 (D. Mass., Filed Nov. 30, 2023), Hon. Judge Myong J.
Joun entered a scheduling order as follows:

-- Close of fact discovery:                       May 17, 2024

-- Plaintiffs designate experts and serve         June 7, 2024
    Rule 26(a)(2) reports for experts
    offering opinions other than those
    bearing on class certification
    (includes end-payor plaintiffs (EPP)
    and retailers on common issues):

-- Deadline for moving plaintiffs to notice       June 7, 2024
    depositions of Takeda witnesses on
    EPP-specific and retailer-specific
    issues:

-- Director purchaser plaintiffs (DPP)            June 14, 2024
    motion for class certification and
    designation of experts and service of
    Rule 26(a)(2) reports for experts
    offering opinions bearing on class
    certification:

-- Takeda designates experts and serves           Aug. 2, 2024
    Rule 26(a)(2) reports for experts
    offering opinions other than those
    bearing on class certification
    (includes EPPs and retailers on
    common issues):

-- Takeda's opposition to DPPs' motion            Aug. 23, 2024
    for class certification and
    designation of experts and service
    of Rule 26(a)(2) reports for experts
    offering opinions bearing on class
    certification:

-- Deadline for fact discovery of                Sept.9, 2024
    EPP-specific and retailer-specific
    issues:

The nature of suit states antitrust.[CC]

TANDYM GROUP: Faces Armstrong Data Breach Suit
----------------------------------------------
LYNETTE ARMSTRONG, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated v. TANDYM GROUP, LLC, Case No. 1:24-cv-03072-JPO
(S.D.N.Y., April 22, 2024) accuses the Defendant of failing to
properly secure and safeguard Plaintiff's and other similarly
situated employees' sensitive information.

The Plaintiff's and Class members' personally identifiable
information was compromised in a data breach that occurred on
Defendant's systems on May 18, 2023. According to Plaintiff, the
Defendant's failure to adequately protect the PII of its employees
was mainly to blame for the data breach. Further, the Defendant
omitted critical information from the notice letter it sent to
those affected by the data breach, diminishing their ability to
mitigate the harms resulting from the data breach. The Plaintiff
now brings claims for negligence, breach of implied contract,
breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment/quasi contract.
   
Tandym Group, LLC is an employee staffing company located in New
York, NY. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

        Andrew J. Shamis, Esq.
        Leanna A. Loginov, Esq.
        SHAMIS & GENTILE P.A.     
        14 NE 1st Ave., Suite 705
        Miami, FL 33132
        Telephone: (305) 479-2299
        E-mail: ashamis@shamisgentile.com
                lloginov@shamisgentile.com

TAYLOR MORRISON: Continues to Defend Gundel Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------
Taylor Morrison Home Corp. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for
the quarterly period ending March 31, 2024 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2024, that the
Company continues to defend itself from the Gundel class suit

On April 26, 2017, a class action complaint was filed in the
Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit in and for Polk County,
Florida by Norman Gundel, William Mann, and Brenda Taylor against
Avatar Properties, Inc. (an acquired AV Homes entity) ("Avatar"),
generally alleging that the Company's collection of club membership
fees in connection with the use of one of its amenities in our East
homebuilding segment violates various laws relating to homeowner
associations and other Florida-specific laws (the "Solivita
litigation").

The class action complaint sought an injunction to prohibit future
collection of club membership fees.

On November 2, 2021, the court determined that the club membership
fees were improper and that plaintiffs were entitled to $35.0
million in fee reimbursements.

The Company appealed the court’s ruling to the Sixth District
Court of Appeal on November 29, 2021, and the plaintiffs agreed to
continue to pay club membership fees pending the outcome of the
appeal.

On June 23, 2023 the District Court affirmed the trial court
judgment in a split decision, with three separate opinions.

Recognizing the potential "far-reaching effects on homeowners
associations throughout the State," the District Court certified a
question of great public importance to the Florida Supreme Court,
and it filed a notice to invoke the discretionary review of the
Florida Supreme Court.

On November 2, 2023, the Florida Supreme Court declined to exercise
jurisdiction.

Following the Florida Supreme Court's decision, it paid $64.7
million to the plaintiffs during the quarter ended December 31,
2023, which included the amount of the trial court's judgment, club
membership fees received during the pendency of its appeal,
pre-judgment interest and post-judgment interest.

The Company expects to incur additional costs with respect to the
plaintiff's legal fees and costs; however, such amount cannot be
reasonably estimated.

Plaintiffs have also asserted claims for additional pre-judgment
interest, for which it believes it has substantial defenses.

Taylor Morrison Home Corporation is into residential homebuilding
and the development of lifestyle communities based in Arizona.




TD BANK: Faces Caraffa Suit Over Unlawful Private Info Disclosure
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MONICA CARAFFA, for herself and others similarly situated,
Plaintiff v. TD BANK, N.A., Defendant, Case No. 240402762 (Del.
Ch., April 19, 2024), alleges that the Defendant violated the
Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act.

Allegedly, the Defendant aids, employs, agrees, and conspires with
a third party, Meta Platforms, Inc. (Facebook), to intercept
communications sent and received by Plaintiff and Class Members,
including communications that contain sensitive and confidential
information. The Defendant has integrated the Facebook Tracking
Pixel into the Website. Facebook, as enabled by Defendant,
contemporaneously intercepts the URL of the webpages visited by
Plaintiff and other Website users with aid of the Facebook Tracking
Pixel. Moreover, by failing to procure consent before enabling
Facebook to intercept these communications, Defendant violated
WESCA, says the suit.

Headquartered in Cherry Hill, NJ, TD Bank, N.A. provides banking
services to many of Pennsylvania's banking customers. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

           Benjamin F. Johns, Esq.
           SHUB & JOHNS LLC
           Four Tower Bridge
           200 Barr Harbor Drive, Suite 400
           Conshohocken, PA 19428
           Telephone: (610) 477-8380
           E-mail: bjohns@shublawyers.com

                   - and -

           Philip L. Fraietta, Esq.
           Joshua D. Arisohn, Esq.
           BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
           1330 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
           New York, NY 10019
           Telephone: (646) 837-7150
           Facsimile: (212) 989-9163
           E-mail: pfraietta@bursor.com
                   jarisohn@bursor.com

                   - and -

           Brittany S. Scott, Esq.
           BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
           1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
           Walnut Creek, CA 94596
           Telephone: (925) 300-4455
           Facsimile: (925) 407-2700
           E-mail: bscott@bursor.com

TELADOC HEALTH: Dismissal of Consolidated Suit Under Appeal
-----------------------------------------------------------
Teladoc Health, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2024, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on October April 26, 2024, that a
consolidated securities suit captioned "In re Teladoc Health, Inc.
Securities Litigation" has been dismissed by the court. On November
17, 2023, the lead plaintiff filed an appeal in the United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

On June 6, 2022, a purported securities class action complaint
captioned "Schneider v. Teladoc Health, Inc., et. al." was filed in
the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
against the Company and certain of the company's officers. The
complaint was brought on behalf of a purported class consisting of
all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired shares
of the company's common stock during the period October 28, 2021
through April 27, 2022.

The complaint asserted violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated
thereunder based on allegedly false or misleading statements and
omissions with respect to, among other things, the company's
business, operations, and prospects. The complaint seeks
certification as a class action and unspecified compensatory
damages plus interest and attorneys' fees.

The Schneider action was consolidated under the caption "In re
Teladoc Health, Inc. Securities Litigation," and on August 23,
2022, the court appointed Leadersel Innotech ESG as lead plaintiff
pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint on September 30,
2022, on behalf of a purported class consisting of all persons or
entities who purchased or otherwise acquired shares of the
company's common stock during the period February 24, 2021 to July
27, 2022, and filed a second amended complaint on December 6, 2022,
on behalf of a purported class consisting of all persons or
entities who purchased or otherwise acquired shares of the
company's common stock during the period February 11, 2021 to July
27, 2022.

On July 5, 2023, the court granted the defendants' motion to
dismiss the complaint. On November 17, 2023, the lead plaintiff
filed an appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit.

Teladoc Health, Inc. is a healthcare company based in New York.


TJX COMPANIES: Embeds Spy Pixel Trackers in Emails, Campos Says
---------------------------------------------------------------
ARLETTE CAMPOS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. TJX COMPANIES, INC., Case No. 1:24-cv-11067 (D. Mass.,
April 22, 2024) accuses the Defendant of violating Arizona's
Telephone, Utility and Communication Service Records Act.

The Defendant, a multinational department store corporation,
solicits customers to sign up for its email list to maximize sales.
The Plaintiff and Class members are subscribers to that email list.
Allegedly, Defendant embeds hidden spy pixel trackers within its
promotional emails, allowing it to capture subscribers' sensitive
information, including their reading habits and confidential email
records. The Plaintiff claims that Defendant procures such
information without subscribers' consent, in violation of Arizona's
Telephone, Utility and Communication Service Records Act.
   
TJX Companies, Inc. is an American off-price apparel and home
fashions retailer based in Framingham, MA. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

        Joel D. Smith, Esq.
        SMITH KRIVOSHEY, P.C.     
        867 Boylston Street
        5th Floor #1520
        Boston, MA 02116
        Telephone: (617) 377-7404
        Facsimile: (310) 566-9886
        E-mail: joel@skclassactions.com

                - and -
     
        Yitzchak Kopel, Esq.
        Alec M. Leslie, Esq.
        Israel Rosenberg, Esq.
        BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
        1330 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
        New York, NY 10019
        Telephone: (646) 837-7150
        Facsimile: (212) 989-9163
        E-mail: ykopel@bursor.com
                aleslie@bursor.com
                irosenberg@bursor.com

TWITTER INC: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Ma Due June 17
-----------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as FABIEN HO CHING MA, et
al., v. TWITTER, INC., et al., Case No. 4:23-cv-03301-JST (N.D.
Cal.), the Hon. Judge Jon Tigar entered a scheduling order as
follows:

            Event                                 Deadline

  Class certification motion due:               June 17, 2024

  Class certification opposition due:           July 15, 2024

  Class certification reply due:                July 29, 2024

  Hearing on motion for class certification:    Aug. 22, 2024

  Hearing on motion to compel arbitration:      Oct. 3, 2024

Twitter. was an American social media company based in San
Francisco, California, which operated and was named for its
flagship social media network prior to its rebrand as X.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=p0Iwue at no extra
charge.[CC]

TYCO FIRE: Camden City Sues Over Exposure to Toxic Chemicals
------------------------------------------------------------
CITY OF CAMDEN, CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY, CITY OF BENWOOD,
CITY OF BROCKTON, CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, CITY OF FREEPORT, CITY OF
SIOUX FALLS, CITY OF SOUTH SHORE, CORAOPOLIS WATER & SEWER
AUTHORITY, DALTON FARMS WATER SYSTEM, MARTINSBURG MUNICIPAL
AUTHORITY, TOWNSHIP OF VERONA, AND VILLAGE OF BRIDGEPORT,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. TYCO
FIRE PRODUCTS LP, individually and as successor in interest to The
Ansul Company, and CHEMGUARD, INC, Case No. 2:24-cv-02321-RMG
(D.S.C., April 22, 2024) seeks damages and other relief over the
widespread contamination of drinking water supplies by per- and
polyfluoroalkyl substances coming from Defendants' aqueous
film-foaming foam products.  

According to Plaintiffs, Defendants have continued to manufacture
and sell PFAS-containing AFFF despite being aware of the toxic
nature of such products. As a result, the drinking water supplies
of Plaintiffs have been contaminated with PFAS from Defendants'
AFFF products, causing significant injury and damage to Plaintiffs
and other similarly situated public water systems.

Based in Marinette, WI, Tyco Fire Products LP manufactures and
sells AFFF products. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

        Michael A. London, Esq.
        DOUGLAS AND LONDON PC     
        59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor  
        New York, NY 10038
        Telephone: (212) 566-7500
        Facsimile: (212) 566-7501
        E-mail: mlondon@douglasandlondon.com

                - and -
     
        Paul J. Napoli, Esq.
        NAPOLI SHKOLNIK
        1302 Avenida Ponce de León
        San Juan, PR 00907
        Telephone: (833) 271-4502
        Facsimile: (646) 843-7603
        E-mail: pnapoli@nsprlaw.com

                - and -
     
        Scott Summy, Esq.
        BARON & BUDD, P.C.
        3102 Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 1100
        Dallas, TX 75219
        Telephone: (214) 521-3605
        E-mail: ssummy@baronbudd.com

                - and -
     
        Joseph Rice, Esq.
        MOTLEY RICE LLC
        28 Bridgeside Boulevard
        Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464
        Telephone: (843) 216-9000
        Facsimile: (843) 216-9440
        E-mail: jrice@motleyrice.com

TYSON FOODS: Colvin Wins Class Cert. Bid
----------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Colvin v. Tyson Foods,
Inc. et al., Case No. 6:20-cv-00480 (E.D. Okla), the Hon. Judge
Robert Shelby entered an order granting the Plaintiffs' motion for
class certification and denying PPC's motion to exclude Singer's
expert opinions.

The court certifies a class consisting of all individuals and
entities in the United States and its territories that were
compensated for Broiler Grow-Out Services by a Defendant or
Co-Conspirator (excluding Claxton and Allen Harim), or by a
division, subsidiary, predecessor affiliate of a Defendant or
Co-Conspirator (excluding Claxton and Allen Harim), at any time
during the period of Jan. 27, 2013 through and including Dec. 31,
2019.

Hausfeld LLP and Berger Montague PC are appointed Class Counsel and
named Plaintiffs are appointed as Class representatives

The Plaintiffs seek to certify a nationwide class of Growers who
provided broiler grow-out services for PPC or one of its 20
co-conspirators while those Integrators participated in the alleged
Overarching Agreement.

Specifically, the Plaintiffs' Grower class is defined as follows:

   "All individuals and entities in the United States and its
   territories that were compensated for Broiler Grow-Out Services
by
   a Defendant or Co-Conspirator (excluding Claxton and Allen
Harim),
   or by a division, subsidiary, predecessor, or affiliate of a
   Defendant or Co-Conspirator (excluding Claxton and Allen Harim),
at
   any time during the period of January 27, 2013, through and
   including December 31, 2019. The proposed class includes 24,354

   Growers who raised at least one flock of broilers for either PPC
or
   one of PPC's co-conspirators during the class period."

The Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly
situated growers of broiler chickens (Growers), assert an antitrust
claim against Defendant Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (PPC).

The Plaintiffs are, or were, Growers providing broiler grow-out
services during the proposed class period.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 8, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Ces9hV at no extra
charge.[CC]

TYSON FOODS: McEntire Bid for Class Status OK'd
-----------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as McEntire et al v. Tyson
Foods, Inc. et al., Case No.  6:20-cv-00479 (E.D. Okla), the Hon.
Judge Robert Shelby entered an order granting the Plaintiffs'
motion for class certification and denying PPC's motion to exclude
Singer's expert opinions.

The court certifies a class consisting of all individuals and
entities in the United States and its territories that were
compensated for Broiler Grow-Out Services by a Defendant or
Co-Conspirator (excluding Claxton and Allen Harim), or by a
division, subsidiary, predecessor affiliate of a Defendant or
Co-Conspirator (excluding Claxton and Allen Harim), at any time
during the period of Jan. 27, 2013 through and including Dec. 31,
2019.

Hausfeld LLP and Berger Montague PC are appointed Class Counsel and
named Plaintiffs are appointed as Class representatives

The Plaintiffs seek to certify a nationwide class of Growers who
provided broiler grow-out services for PPC or one of its 20
co-conspirators while those Integrators participated in the alleged
Overarching Agreement.

Specifically, the Plaintiffs' Grower class is defined as follows:

   "All individuals and entities in the United States and its
   territories that were compensated for Broiler Grow-Out Services
by
   a Defendant or Co-Conspirator (excluding Claxton and Allen
Harim),
   or by a division, subsidiary, predecessor, or affiliate of a
   Defendant or Co-Conspirator (excluding Claxton and Allen Harim),
at
   any time during the period of January 27, 2013, through and
   including December 31, 2019. The proposed class includes 24,354

   Growers who raised at least one flock of broilers for either PPC
or
   one of PPC's co-conspirators during the class period."

The Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly
situated growers of broiler chickens (Growers), assert an antitrust
claim against Defendant Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (PPC).

The Plaintiffs are, or were, Growers providing broiler grow-out
services during the proposed class period.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 8, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=OHphWi at no extra
charge.[CC]

USC: Class Cert Bid Filing Continued to Nov. 8 in Favell Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as IOLA FAVELL, SUE
ZARNOWSKI, MARIAH CUMMINGS, and AHMAD MURTADA, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated, v. UNIVERSITY OF
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Case No. 2:23-cv-00846-GW-MAR (C.D. Cal.), the
Hon. Judge George Wu entered an order to continue class
certification-related case deadlines as follows:

         Event                      Previous             New
                                    Deadline             Deadline

  Plaintiffs' Class Expert        June 7, 2024        July 12, 2024

  Report(s)

  USC's Deposition(s) of          June 12-21, 2024    July 17-26,
2024
  Plaintiffs' Class Expert(s)

  Plaintiffs' Motion for          Sept. 25, 2024      Nov. 8, 2024

  Class Certification

  USC's Response to               Oct. 25, 2024       Dec. 9, 2024

  Plaintiffs' Motion for
  Class Certification

  Plaintiffs' Reply in            Nov. 8, 2024        Dec. 23,
2024
  Support of Motion for
  Class Certification

  Court Hearing and Oral          Nov. 25, 2024       Jan. 9, 2025

  Argument on Motion for          at 8:30 a.m.        at 8:30 a.m.
  Class Certification


The Defendant is a private institution that was founded in 1880.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=GEIKQ5 at no extra
charge.[CC]

USC: Class Cert Bid Filing Continued to Nov. 8 in Zarnowski Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as IOLA FAVELL, SUE
ZARNOWSKI, MARIAH CUMMINGS, and AHMAD MURTADA, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated, v. UNIVERSITY OF
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Case No. 2:23-cv-03389-GW-MAR (C.D. Cal.), the
Hon. Judge George Wu entered an order to continue class
certification-related case deadlines as follows:

         Event                      Previous             New
                                    Deadline             Deadline

  Plaintiffs' Class Expert        June 7, 2024        July 12, 2024

  Report(s)

  USC's Deposition(s) of          June 12-21, 2024    July 17-26,
2024
  Plaintiffs' Class Expert(s)

  Plaintiffs' Motion for          Sept. 25, 2024      Nov. 8, 2024

  Class Certification

  USC's Response to               Oct. 25, 2024       Dec. 9, 2024

  Plaintiffs' Motion for
  Class Certification

  Plaintiffs' Reply in            Nov. 8, 2024        Dec. 23,
2024
  Support of Motion for
  Class Certification

  Court Hearing and Oral          Nov. 25, 2024       Jan. 9, 2025

  Argument on Motion for          at 8:30 a.m.        at 8:30 a.m.
  Class Certification

The Defendant is a private institution that was founded in 1880.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=d3vTJA at no extra
charge.[CC]


VALLEY MOUNTAIN: Neff Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
---------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Valley Mountain
Regional Center. The case is styled as Santino Neff, as an
individual and on behalf of all other similarly situated v.
Fidelity National Financial Inc., LoanCare LLC, Does 1-10, Case No.
STK-CV-UBT-2024-0005170 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Joaquin Cty., April
29, 2024).

The nature of suit is stated as Other Statutory Actions.

Valley Mountain Regional Center -- https://www.vmrc.net/ --
provides diagnostic, evaluation, case management and prevention
services to children and adults with developmental disabilities to
include: autism, mental retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy and
other special needs disabilities requiring treatment similar to
mental retardation.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jason M. Wucetich, Esq.
          WUCETICH AND KOROVILAS LLP
          222 North Pacific Coast Highway Suite 2000
          El Segundo, CA 90245
          Phone: (310) 335-2001
          Fax: (310) 364-5201
          Email: jason@wukolaw.com


VANTAGE SUPPORTED: Green Seeks Proper Overtime Wages
----------------------------------------------------
NIKKI GREEN, On behalf of herself And all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. VANTAGE SUPPORTED LIVING, LLC, Defendant,
Case No. 2:24-cv-04061-BCW (W.D. Mo., April 19, 2024) arises from
Defendant's unlawful employment practices that violated the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

Plaintiff Green was employed by the Defendant as an aide/life coach
from approximately March 2021 to the present. Allegedly,
Defendant's policy, practice and/or procedure has been, and
continues to be, to willfully fail and refuse to properly pay
minimum wages, straight time and overtime compensation due and
owing to Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees.
Accordingly, Plaintiff also asserts claims for unjust enrichment
and for violations of the Missouri Wage statutes.

Based in California, MO, Vantage Supported Living, LLC provides
independent support living services for adults with developmental
disabilities. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Michael Hodgson, Esq.
          THE HODGSON LAW FIRM, L.L.C.
          3609 SW Pryor Road
          Lee’s Summit, MO 64082
          Telephone: (816) 600-0117
          E-mail: mike@thehodgsonlawfirm.com

                  - and -

          Phillip M. Murphy II, Esq.
          PHILLIP MURPHY LAW
          4717 Grand Ave., Ste. 300
          Kansas City, MO 64112
          Telephone: (913) 661-2900
          E-mail: phillip@phillipmurphylaw.com

VMSB LLC: Bid for Leave to File Class Cert Opposition OK'd
----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Volpe et al v. VMSB, LLC,
Case No. 1:23-cv-23888 (S.D. Fla., Filed Oct. 11, 2023), the Hon.
Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II entered an order granting the Defendant's
unopposed motion for leave of court to deem response in opposition
timely filed.

-- The court is in receipt of Defendant's response in opposition
to
    Plaintiffs' motion to certify class, and deems it timely
filed.

The suit alleges violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA).[CC]

WARNER MUSIC: Class Cert Bid Filing in Hall Due July 26
-------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JOHN HALL, an individual;
and LANCE HOPPEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated, v. WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORP., a Delaware Corporation;
WARNER MUSIC INC., a Delaware Corporation; and WARNER RECORDS INC.,
a Delaware Corporation, Case No. 3:22-cv-00457 (M.D. Tenn.), the
Hon. Judge Aleta Trauger entered an order that the deadline for the
Plaintiffs to file a motion for class certification and serve any
expert disclosures in support thereof shall be July 26, 2024.

Warner records and publishes music.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=CPdHD2 at no extra
charge.[CC]

WASHINGTON FINE WINE: Branson Suit Removed to W.D. Washington
-------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Lisa Branson, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. WASHINGTON FINE WINE & SPIRITS, LLC, a
Washington limited liability company doing business as TOTAL WINE &
MORE; and DOES 1–20, Case No. 24-2-06594-6 SEA was removed from
the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, to
the United States District Court for the Western District of
Washington on April 29, 2024, and assigned Case No. 2:24-cv-00589.

On March 26, 2024, the Plaintiff alleges that WFW&S violated the
Revised Code of Washington (RCW) by failing to post the wage scale
or salary range for a Tukwila-based "Wine/Spirit Sales Associate"
job.[BN]

The Defendant is represented by:

          Malaika M. Eaton, Esq.
          McNAUL EBEL NAWROT & HELGREN PLLC
          2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500
          600 University Street, Suite 2700
          Seattle, WA 98101
          Phone: (206) 467-1816
          Email: meaton@mcnaul.com

               - and -

          William J. Murphy, Esq.
          John J. Connolly, Esq.
          ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER LLP
          100 East Pratt Street, Suite 2440
          Baltimore, Maryland 21202-1031
          Phone: (410) 332-0444
          Email: wmurphy@zuckerman.com
                 jconnolly@zuckerman.com


WAYNE COUNTY, MI: 26 Plaintiffs Dismissed from Harris Suit
----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as NICOLE HARRIS et al., v.
COUNTY OF WAYNE, and TERRI GRAHAM, Case No. 2:23-cv-10986-LJM-APP
(E.D. Mich.), the Hon. Judge Laurie Michelson entered an order
granting in part and denying in part the Defendants' motion to
dismiss such that the 26 Plaintiffs who were released from jail
before April 27, 2016 are dismissed from this action.

The case is very similar to Woodall, where the Sixth Circuit
previously decided that Rule 23's commonality, typicality,
adequacy-of-representation, and predominance requirements were not
satisfied. Yet "a class must be certified before it may become a
class action.

Until the putative class is certified, the action is one between
the [individual plaintiffs] and the defendants." And the remaining
individual named Plaintiffs have timely claims to assert. So there
is no basis to dismiss them now.

In short, dismissing Plaintiffs with timely individual claims at
this stage simply because they cannot be part of a class that may
or may not be certified is premature.

The lawsuit was filed on April 27, 2023. The parties agree that
Plaintiffs are barred from bringing a class action for claims that
accrued before April 27, 2020.

The Plaintiffs -- 126 women who were formerly incarcerated at the
Wayne County Jail—filed this civil rights class action under 42
U.S.C. section 1983, alleging that they were subjected to
unconstitutional strip searches between 2014 and 2022.

A copy of the Court's opinion and order dated May 7, 2024, is
available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=ZYtUcR
at no extra charge.[CC] 


XEROX CORP: Filing of Bid for Class Cert Revised to Feb. 4, 2025
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as BARRY COLE, on behalf of
himself and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, v.
XEROX CORPORATION, a New York corporation, and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive, Case No. 2:23-cv-03846-AB-RAO (C.D. Cal.), the Hon.
Judge Andre Birotte Jr. entered an order granting stipulation re:
revised class certification briefing schedule:

   1. The Plaintiff's deadline to move for class certification is
      Feb. 4, 2025.

   2. The Defendant's opposition is due March 18, 2025.

   3. The Plaintiff's reply is due April 8, 2025.

   4. The hearing on Plaintiff's motion will be May 9, 2025 at
10:00
      a.m.

Xerox is an American multinational document management
corporation.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 7, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=W5GoxD at no extra
charge.[CC]


                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Rousel Elaine T.
Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L.
Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2024. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***