---

              C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

              Friday, September 13, 2024, Vol. 26, No. 185

                            Headlines

AM RETAIL GROUP: Morris Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website
ARDENT HEALTH: Burke Class Suit Settlement for Court Approval
AST SPACEMOBILE: Bid to Dismiss Consolidated Suit Pending
AST SPACEMOBILE: Filing of Bid to Junk Klarkowski Suit Due Nov. 8
BENEFICIENT: Continues to Defend GWG Holdings Securities Suit

BIOVENTUS INC: $15.25MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Dec. 13
CANOO INC: Continues to Defend Suit Alleging Labor Violations
CANOO INC: Fact Discovery in Securities Suit Due Jan. 24, 2025
DZS INC: Faces Consolidated Securities Suit in Texas Court
ECOATM LLC: Morris Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website

FARADAY FUTURE: Continues to Defend Consolidated Class Suit in DE
GIGACQUISITIONS2 LLC: $7.25MM Settlement to be Heard on Oct. 8
GIGACQUISITIONS4 LLC: $2.5MM Settlement to be Heard on oct. 8
HYRECAR INC:$1.9MM Class Settlement to be Heard on November 14
INSPIRATO INC: Continues to Defend Koch Class Suit in Colorado

INVIVYD INC: Continues to Defend Brill Securities Class Suit
KATAPULT HOLDINGS: Settlement in Securities Suit for Court Approval
LFTD PARTNERS: Continues to Defend Perry Class Suit
LINCOLN NATIONAL: Provisional Settlement in Glover for Court OK
MDL 2903: Settlement in Flores v. Fisher-Price Wins Initial Nod

MDL 2992: Plaintiffs Seek to Certify Class Action
NANO NUCLEAR: Continues to Defend Yang Securities Class Suit
ONTRAK INC: Continues to Defend Braun Securities Class Suit
ONTRAK INC: Continues to Defend Consolidated Suit in California
QUANTUMSCAPE SECURITIES: $47.5MM Settlement to be Heard on Nov. 13

SERITAGE GROWTH: Continues to Defend Zhengxu He Class Suit in N.Y.
SPRUCE POWER: Continues to Defend XL Fleet Class Suit
STRONGHOLD DIGITAL: Continues to Defend Winter Class Suit in N.Y.
TALPHERA INC: Filing of Appellate Opening Brief Due Sept. 27
TMC THE METALS CO: Continues to Defend Consolidated Suit in NY

VERRICA PHARMACEUTICALS: Bid to Dismiss Gorlamari SAC Pending
VOCODIA HOLDINGS: Continues to Defend TCPA Class Suit

                        Asbestos Litigation

ASBESTOS UPDATE: Claims Coverage Suit Against BNSF, Zurich Dropped


                            *********

AM RETAIL GROUP: Morris Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website
------------------------------------------------------------
Zachary Morris, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. AM RETAIL GROUP, INC., Case No. 1:24-cv-05729 (E.D.
Wis., Sept. 2, 2024), is brought against Defendant for its failure
to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully
accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff and other blind
or visually-impaired people.

The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its website, and
therefore denial of its goods and services offered thereby, is a
violation of the Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with
Disabilities Act ("ADA").

Congress provided a clear and national mandate for the elimination
of discrimination against individuals with disabilities when it
enacted the ADA. Such discrimination includes barriers to full
integration, independent living and equal opportunity for persons
with disabilities, including those barriers created by websites and
other public accommodations that are inaccessible to blind and
visually impaired persons.

Because the Defendant's website, www.wilsonsleather.com (the
"Website"), is not equally accessible to blind and visually
impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a
permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's corporate
policies, practices, and procedures so that Defendant's website
will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired
consumers, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who
requires screen-reading software to read website content using the
computer.

The Defendant is a company that owns and operates
www.wilsonsleather.com offering features which should allow all
consumers to access the goods and services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Yaakov Saks, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          One University Plaza, Suite 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500 ext. 101
          Fax: (201) 282-6501
          Email: ysaks@steinsakslegal.com


ARDENT HEALTH: Burke Class Suit Settlement for Court Approval
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ardent Health Partners Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for
the quarterly period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2024, that the Burke class
suit settlement is subject to the approval of the United States
District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.

In November 2023, three putative class actions were filed against
the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of
Tennessee: Burke v. AHS Medical Holdings LLC, No. 3:23-cv-01308;
Redd v. AHS Medical Holdings, LLC, No. 3:23-cv-01342; and Epperson
v. AHS Management Company, Inc., No. 3:24-cv-00396.

These cases were consolidated by the court on April 24, 2024, under
the caption Hodge v. AHS Management Company, Inc., No.
3:23-cv-01308 (M.D. Tenn.).

The complaint for the consolidated class action, filed on behalf of
approximately 38,000 individuals who allege their personal
information and protected health information were affected by the
Cybersecurity Incident, generally asserts state common law claims
of negligence, breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment,
breach of fiduciary duty, and invasion of privacy with respect to
how the Company managed sensitive data. In July 2024, the Company
reached an agreement in principle to settle the consolidated case,
but the settlement has not yet been approved by the court.

Settlement of the consolidated case on the agreed terms will
require the Company to make a cash settlement payment that will not
have a material impact on the Company's results of operations,
financial position or liquidity.

The Company expects the final settlement and resolution of the case
to occur in the second or third quarter of 2025.

The Company is pursuing insurance coverage in relation to costs and
liabilities incurred due to the Cybersecurity Incident.

Ardent Health Partners is a holding company whose subsidiaries
operate acute-care hospitals and other health care facilities.

AST SPACEMOBILE: Bid to Dismiss Consolidated Suit Pending
---------------------------------------------------------
AST SpaceMobile Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 13, 2024, that the bid to dismiss a
consolidated class suit is pending in the Delaware Court of
Chancery.

Following books and records demands pursuant to 8 Del. C. § 220,
two stockholders filed putative class action complaints in the
Delaware Court of Chancery against the Company, certain current and
former directors and officers of the Company and its predecessor
entity and manager, New Providence Acquisition Corp. and New
Providence Management LLC, and Abel Avellan, alleging claims of
breach of fiduciary duties, aiding and abetting such breaches, and
unjust enrichment, relating to the de-SPAC merger.

The first of those complaints, Taylor v. Coleman, et al. (C.A. No.
2023-1292), was filed on December 27, 2023, and the second, Drulias
v. New Providence Management LLC, et al., was filed on March 29,
2024 (collectively, the "Delaware Stockholder Class Actions").

On March 15, 2024, prior to the filing of the Drulias action, the
defendants had moved to dismiss the Taylor action.

On April 29, 2024, the court entered a stipulation by the parties
to both actions to be consolidated under the caption In re AST
SpaceMobile, Inc. Stockholders Litigation (C.A. No. 2023-1292), and
for the plaintiffs to file a consolidated amended complaint by May
29, 2024.

Plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on May 29, 2024, which
asserts the same claims and seeks the same damages—equitable
relief and unspecified monetary damages.

On July 15, 2024, the defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated
complaint.

AST SpaceMobile, Inc. is a satellite designer and manufacturer
headquartered in Midland, TX. [BN]



AST SPACEMOBILE: Filing of Bid to Junk Klarkowski Suit Due Nov. 8
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AST SpaceMobile Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 13, 2024, that the deadline for the
defendants to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the
consolidated Klarkowski amended complaint is November 8, 2024.

The Company and certain of its current executive officers have been
named as defendants in a putative stockholder class action lawsuit
pending in the United States District Court for the Western
District of Texas. The action is styled Klarkowski v. AST
SpaceMobile, Inc., No. 7:24-cv-00102-DC-RCG (W.D. Tex.) (the
"Securities Class Action").

The complaint in the Securities Class Action, which was filed on
April 17, 2024, alleges that defendants violated the Exchange Act
and SEC Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by making false and
misleading statements and omissions relating to the status and
timeline of satellite production, and that the current executive
officers named as defendants are control persons under Section
20(a) of the Exchange Act.

The complaint is filed on behalf of shareholders who purchased
shares of the Company's common stock between November 14, 2023 and
April 1, 2024 ("Class Period"), and seeks monetary damages on
behalf of the purported class.

On July 9, 2024, the Court appointed a Lead Plaintiff for the
putative class and approved his choice of Lead Counsel.

The deadline for Lead Plaintiff to file his consolidated amended
complaint is September 9, 2024.

AST SpaceMobile, Inc. is a satellite designer and manufacturer
headquartered in Midland, TX. [BN]

BENEFICIENT: Continues to Defend GWG Holdings Securities Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------
Beneficient disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 13, 2024, that the Company continues to defend
itself from the GWG Holdings securities class suit in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

Beneficient disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 13, 2024, that the Company continues to defend
itself from GWG Holdings securities class suit the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

On February 18, 2022, Shirin Bayati and Mojan Kamalvand, on behalf
of themselves and of all others similarly situated, filed a class
action lawsuit in the United States District Court for Northern
District of Texas against GWG, its former President and Chief
Executive Officer, Murray Holland, its former Chief Financial
Officer, Timothy Evans, and certain past and present members of the
board of directors of GWG and BCG (Roy Bailey, Peter T. Cangany,
Jr., David Chavenson, Brad K. Heppner, Thomas O. Hicks, Dennis P.
Lockhart, Bruce W. Schnitzer, and David H. de Weese). The suit
alleges that the defendants violated Sections 11, 12, and 15 of the
Securities Act by issuing materially misleading statements in a
June 3, 2020 registration statement. On April 20, 2022, GWG filed
for bankruptcy protection in the Southern District of Texas. On
April 21, 2022, the district court ordered all parties to submit
statements by May 5, 2022 on whether the automatic stay in
bankruptcy extends to the non-debtor defendants. On April 25, 2022,
the Lead Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Appointment as Lead
Plaintiff and Approval of Their Selection of Lead Counsel. On May
2, 2022, a notice of dismissal was filed, dismissing defendants
Peter T. Cangany, Jr., Brad K. Heppner, Thomas O. Hicks, Dennis P.
Lockhart, and Bruce W. Schnitzer. On May 12, 2022, the district
court extended the bankruptcy stay to all non-debtor defendants,
although it permitted a limited modification of lifting of the stay
to allow the court to consider the pending lead plaintiff motion.
On August 5, 2022, the district court entered an order appointing
Thomas Horton and Frank Moore as lead plaintiffs for the putative
class. On May 26, 2023, Thomas Horton and Frank Moore, on behalf of
themselves and other similarly situated, filed a second class
action lawsuit against the Company, Brad K. Heppner, Peter T.
Cangany, Jr., Thomas O. Hicks, Dennis P. Lockhart, Bruce W.
Schnitzer and Whitley Penn LLP, alleging Securities Act violations
arising out of the Offering.

On March 30, 2023, David Scura and Clifford Day, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated, filed a class action
lawsuit in the United States District Court for Northern District
of Texas against Ben, certain members of the Board (Brad K.
Heppner, Peter T. Cangany, Jr., Richard W. Fisher, Thomas O. Hicks,
Dennis P. Lockhart, and Bruce W. Schnitzer), certain past members
of the board of directors of GWG (Jon R. Sabes and Steven F.
Sabes), FOXO and Emerson Equity LLC ("Emerson") (the "Scura
Action"). The suit alleges that the defendants defrauded GWG
investors in connection with the sale of GWG's L Bonds and
preferred stock, and it asserts claims on behalf of a putative
class consisting of all persons and entities who purchased or
otherwise acquired GWG's L Bonds or preferred stock of GWG between
December 23, 2017 and April 20, 2022. The suit alleges that (i) the
Company, the individual defendants, and FOXO violated Sections
10(b) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5 promulgated
thereunder, (ii) that the individual defendants violated Section
20(a) of the Exchange Act and (iii) that Emerson violated Section
15(c)(1)(A) of the Exchange Act. On May 3, 2023, Thomas Horton and
Frank Moore, in their capacities as the lead plaintiffs in the
Bayati Action, filed a motion to lift the automatic stay in the
Chapter 11 Cases in order to file a motion in the Northern District
of Texas seeking to consolidate the Bayati and Scura Actions under
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. On June 8, 2023, the
plaintiffs in the Scura Action filed a voluntary notice of
dismissal without prejudice.

On August 16, 2023, Thomas Horton and Frank Moore, in their
capacities as the Lead Plaintiffs in the Bayati Action, filed a
notice regarding the confirmation of the Debtors' Chapter 11 plan
in the GWG bankruptcy, a motion seeking to lift the bankruptcy stay
and a motion to consolidate the Bayati and Horton Actions. On
September 12, 2023, the court entered an order consolidating the
Bayati and Horton Actions. The court ordered that the consolidated
action shall bear the caption In re GWG Holdings, Inc. Securities
Litigation. The court lifted the bankruptcy stay and ordered the
Lead Plaintiffs to file a new consolidated complaint within 20
days. On October 2, 2023, the Lead Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated
Class Action Complaint against the Company, Brad K. Heppner, Peter
T. Cangany, Jr., Thomas O. Hicks, Dennis P. Lockhart, Bruce W.
Schnitzer (the "Ben Individual Defendants"), Murray T. Holland,
Timothy L. Evans, David H. de Weese, Roy W. Bailey, David F.
Chavenson, and Whitley Penn LLP, alleging Securities Act violations
arising out of the Offering. The complaint alleges that the
individual defendants violated Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the
Securities Act, and further alleges that the Company violated
Section 15 of the Securities Act. The Company and the Ben
Individual Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on
November 7, 2023. On January 4, 2024, defendants Murray Holland,
Roy Bailey, Tim Evans, Whitley Penn, David Chavenson and David H.
de Weese filed motions to dismiss. The Lead Plaintiffs’ responded
to the various motions to dismiss on February 20, 2024, and the
defendants (other than Whitley Penn) filed replies in support of
the motions to dismiss on March 21, 2024. The Company and the Ben
Individual Defendants intend to vigorously defend themselves in the
litigation.

On October 27, 2023, David Scura filed a petition in Dallas County
District Court against Brad K. Heppner, Jon R. Sabes, Steven F.
Sabes, Peter T. Cangany, Jr., Thomas O. Hicks, Dennis P. Lockhart,
Bruce W. Schnitzer, the Company and FOXO, alleging violation of the
Texas Securities Act, common law fraud, unjust enrichment, and
civil conspiracy to defraud. Also on October 27, 2023, Clifford Day
and Carla Monahan filed a petition in Dallas County District Court
against the same defendants, alleging the same claims. The parties
agreed to move the defendants' deadline to respond to the petition
to February 19, 2024. On April 10, 2024, the plaintiffs and Ben
parties entered into a twelve-month tolling agreement, and the
plaintiffs filed motions to nonsuit their claims that the courts
granted on April 12, 2024 and April 16, 2024, respectively. The
Company and the Ben Individual Defendants intend to vigorously
defend themselves in the litigation.

Beneficient is a technology-enabled financial services holding
company based in Texas.




BIOVENTUS INC: $15.25MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Dec. 13
---------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

ROBERT CIARCIELLO Individually and on
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

                        Plaintiff,

            v.

BIOVENTUS INC., KENNETH M. REALI,
MARK L. SINGLETON, GREGORY O.
ANGLUM, and SUSAN M. STALNECKER,

            Defendants.

Case No. 1:23-cv-00032-CCE-JEP

SUMMARY NOTICE

TO: ALL PERSONS OR ENTITIES WHO PURCHASED OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRED
BIOVENTUS CLASS A COMMON STOCK BETWEEN FEBRUARY 11, 2021, AND
NOVEMBER 21, 2022, BOTH INCLUSIVE, AND WERE DAMAGED THEREBY (the
"Settlement Class").  

THIS NOTICE WAS AUTHORIZED BY THE COURT.  IT IS NOT A LAWYER
SOLICITATION.  PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS
ENTIRETY.  YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
PENDING IN THIS COURT.

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the United States
District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina (the
"Court") and Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that
a hearing will be held on December 13, 2024, at 9:30 a.m., before
the Honorable Catherine C. Eagles, at the L. Richardson Preyer
Courthouse, 324 W. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401, for the
purpose of determining: (1) whether the proposed settlement of the
claims in the above-captioned litigation (the "Litigation") for the
sum of $15,250,000 in cash (the "Settlement") should be approved by
the Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate; (2) whether a
Settlement Class should be certified for purposes of the
Settlement; (3) whether, thereafter, this Litigation should be
dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the terms and conditions set
forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated July 12, 2024 (the
"Stipulation"); (4) whether the proposed Plan of Allocation is
fair, reasonable, and adequate and therefore should be approved;
and (5) the reasonableness of the application for payment of
attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in connection with this
Litigation together with the interest earned thereon (and any
payment to the Lead Plaintiff pursuant to the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 in connection with his representation
of the Settlement Class).  The Court may change the date of this
hearing, or hold it remotely, without providing another notice.
You do NOT need to attend the hearing to receive a distribution
from the Net Settlement Fund.

The Litigation has been preliminarily certified as a class action
on behalf of a Settlement Class of all Persons or entities that who
purchased or otherwise acquired Bioventus Class A common stock
between February 11, 2021, and November 21, 2022, both inclusive,
and were damaged thereby, except for certain Persons or entities
excluded from the Settlement Class, as defined in the full
Long-Form Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class
Action ("Long-Form Notice"), which is available as described below.
If the Settlement is approved, it will resolve all claims in the
Litigation.  Capitalized terms that are not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Long-Form
Notice and/or Stipulation.

A detailed description of the Litigation, including important
information about your rights and options, is in the detailed
Long-Form Notice available at www.BioventusSecuritiesLitigation.com
or by contacting the Claims Administrator at:  Bioventus Securities
Litigation, Claims Administrator, c/o A.B. Data, Ltd., P.O. Box
173114, Milwaukee, WI 53217 or (877) 933-2890.

If you are a Settlement Class Member, in order to share in the
distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, you must submit a Proof of
Claim and Release form ("Proof of Claim") online at
www.BioventusSecuritiesLitigation.com or by mail postmarked no
later than December 2, 2024.  Failure to timely submit a Proof of
Claim will subject your claim to possible rejection and may
preclude you from receiving any payment from the Settlement.

If you desire to be excluded from the Settlement Class, you must
submit a request for exclusion electronically submitted or
postmarked by October 18, 2024, in the manner and form explained in
the detailed Long-Form Notice referred to above.  All Members of
the Settlement Class who do not timely and validly request
exclusion from the Settlement Class will be bound by any judgment
entered in the Litigation pursuant to the terms and conditions of
the Stipulation.

Any objection to the Settlement, Lead Plaintiff's Counsel's Fee and
Expense Application, and/or the proposed Plan of Allocation must be
mailed or delivered to the Clerk of Court and counsel for the
Parties at the addresses below such that it is received no later
than November 22, 2024:

Court:

Clerk of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
L. Richardson Preyer Courthouse
324 W. Market Street
Greensboro, NC 27401

Lead Counsel:

Joseph A. Fonti
BLEICHMAR FONTI & AULD LLP
300 Park Avenue, Suite 1301
New York, NY 10022
Emailed copy to
bioventussettlement@bfalaw.com

Counsel for Defendants:

Colleen C. Smith
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
12670 High Bluff Drive
San Diego, CA 92130

PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR THE CLERK'S OFFICE REGARDING
THIS NOTICE.  If you have any questions about the Settlement, you
may contact counsel for Plaintiffs at the address listed above,
email bioventussettlement@bfalaw.com, call (877) 933-2890, or go to
the following website: www.BioventusSecuritiesLitigation.com.

DATED: AUGUST 13, 2024


CANOO INC: Continues to Defend Suit Alleging Labor Violations
-------------------------------------------------------------
Canoo Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 13, 2024, that the Company continues to defend
itself from the California employment class suit in the Los Angeles
Superior Court.

On July 8, 2024, the Company, Canoo Sales, LLC and Canoo
Technologies Inc. were each named as defendants, as well as
additional employee staffing company defendants, in a putative
class action complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on
behalf of individuals who are alleged to be employees of the
defendants.

Plaintiffs' counsel alleges violations under certain California
state employment related claims on behalf of the putative class,
including, among other things, unpaid compensation, failure to
provide employees meal and rest periods, unpaid minimum and
overtime wages and unreimbursed business expenses.

The Company has retained counsel and has entered into a joint
defense agreement with employee staffing company defendants.

The defendants are currently reviewing the merits of the complaint.


The final determinations of liability arising from this litigation
matter will only be made following comprehensive investigations and
litigation processes.

Canoo Inc. is a mobility technology company into electric vehicles
development.



CANOO INC: Fact Discovery in Securities Suit Due Jan. 24, 2025
--------------------------------------------------------------
Canoo Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 13, 2024, that the fact discovery in
securities class suit is due on January 24, 2025.

On April 2, 2021, and April 9, 2021, the Company was named as a
defendant in putative class action complaints filed in California
on behalf of individuals who purchased or acquired shares of the
Company's stock during a specified period.

Through the complaint, plaintiffs are seeking, among other things,
compensatory damages.

On February 28, 2023, the court granted the Company's motion to
dismiss with leave to amend.

On March 10, 2023, the lead plaintiff filed a second amended
consolidated complaint.

On April 10, 2023, the court entered a stipulated order granting
the lead plaintiff leave to file a third amended consolidated
complaint and relieving defendants of any obligation to respond to
the second amended consolidated complaint.

The lead plaintiff filed a third amended consolidated complaint on
September 8, 2023, and defendants subsequently filed a motion to
dismiss the third amended consolidated complaint.

On January 4, 2024, the lead plaintiff filed his opposition to the
defendants' motion to dismiss.

On February 1, 2024, the defendants filed their reply in support of
the motion to dismiss.

On May 10, 2024, the court entered an order placing the motion to
dismiss under submission and taking the hearing on the motion off
calendar.

The final determinations of liability arising from these litigation
matters will only be made following comprehensive investigations
and litigation processes.

In March 2022, the Company received demand letters on behalf of
shareholders of the Company identifying purchases and sales of the
Company's securities within a period of less than six months by DD
Global Holdings Ltd. ("DDG") that resulted in profits in violation
of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.

On May 9, 2022, the Company brought an action against DDG in the
Southern District of New York seeking the disgorgement of the
Section 16(b) profits obtained by DDG from such purchases and
sales.

In the action, the Company seeks to recover an estimated $61.1
million of Section 16(b) profits.

In September 2022, the Company filed an amended complaint and DDG
filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint.

On September 21, 2023, the court issued a decision denying DDG's
motion to dismiss.

DDG's answer to the complaint was filed on October 19, 2023.

An initial pretrial conference was held on January 12, 2024, and
the court entered the case management order that day.

The fact discovery deadline for the case is January 24, 2025.

Canoo Inc. is a mobility technology company into electric vehicles
development.




DZS INC: Faces Consolidated Securities Suit in Texas Court
----------------------------------------------------------
DZS, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2024, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on August 20, 2024, that it is facing a consolidated securities
suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

Initially, DZS shareholders filed "Shim v. DZS et al.," on June 14,
2023 related to its June 1, 2023, Form 8-K announcing the company's
intention to restate its financial statements for the first quarter
of 2023. Said suit was filed in the Eastern District of Texas and
allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act
against DZS, its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial
Officer.

Lead plaintiffs filed applications for appointment on August 14,
2023. On September 12, 2023, the cases were consolidated under the
lead case "Shim v. DZS et al." The plaintiffs are seeking
unspecified damages, interest, fees, costs and interest.

DZS Inc. is a global provider of access and optical networking
infrastructure and artificial intelligence driven cloud software
solutions and provides a wide array of reliable, cost-effective
networking technologies and cloud software to a diverse customer
base.


ECOATM LLC: Morris Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website
-------------------------------------------------------
Zachary Morris, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. ECOATM, LLC, D/B/A GAZELLE, Case No. 2:24-cv-01111
(E.D. Wis., Sept. 2, 2024), is brought against Defendant for its
failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to
be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff and
other blind or visually-impaired people.

The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its website, and
therefore denial of its goods and services offered thereby, is a
violation of the Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with
Disabilities Act ("ADA").

Congress provided a clear and national mandate for the elimination
of discrimination against individuals with disabilities when it
enacted the ADA. Such discrimination includes barriers to full
integration, independent living and equal opportunity for persons
with disabilities, including those barriers created by websites and
other public accommodations that are inaccessible to blind and
visually impaired persons.

Because the Defendant's website, buy.gazelle.com (the "Website"),
is not equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers,
it violates the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to
cause a change in Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and
procedures so that Defendant's website will become and remain
accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, says the
complaint.

The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who
requires screen-reading software to read website content using the
computer.

The Defendant is a company that owns and operates buy.gazelle.com
offering features which should allow all consumers to access the
goods and services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Yaakov Saks, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          One University Plaza, Suite 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500 ext. 101
          Fax: (201) 282-6501
          Email: ysaks@steinsakslegal.com


FARADAY FUTURE: Continues to Defend Consolidated Class Suit in DE
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q
Report for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2024, that the
Company continues to defend itself from a consolidated class suit
in the Delaware Court of Chancery.

On June 14, 2022, a verified stockholder class action complaint was
filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery against, among others, the
Company, its former Global CEO and CFO, and its current Chief
Product and User Ecosystem Officer alleging breaches of fiduciary
duties (the "Yun Class Action").

On September 21, 2022, a second verified stockholder class action
complaint was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery against,
among others, FFIE, the Co-CEOs and independent directors of PSAC,
and certain third-party advisors to PSAC, alleging breaches of
fiduciary duties, and aiding and abetting alleged breaches, in
connection with disclosures and stockholder voting leading up to
the PSAC/Legacy FF merger (the "Cleveland Class Action"), which
action subsequently was consolidated with the Yun Class Action with
the complaint in the Cleveland Class Action being designated as the
operative pleading (collectively, the "Consolidated Delaware Class
Action").

In April, 2023, the defendants respectively filed motions to
dismiss the complaint.

The Company maintains that the Consolidated Delaware Class Action
is without merit and has stated its intention to vigorously defend
that action.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. conducts its operations
through the subsidiaries of FF Intelligent Mobility Global Holdings
Ltd. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The operate a global shared
intelligent electric mobility ecosystem company with a vision to
reformat the automotive industry.


GIGACQUISITIONS2 LLC: $7.25MM Settlement to be Heard on Oct. 8
--------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CODY LAIDLAW,

                                      Plaintiff,

                   v.

GIGACQUISITIONS2, LLC, RALUCA
DINU, AVI S. KATZ, NEIL MIOTTO,
JOHN MIKULSKY, and GIL FROSTIG,

                                      Defendants.

C.A. No. 2021-0821-LWW

SUMMARY NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER CLASS ACTION,
SETTLEMENT HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR

TO:   All record and beneficial holders of UpHealth, Inc. f/k/a
GigCapital2, Inc. ("New UpHealth" or the "Company") common stock
who held such shares between the close of business on April 26,
2021 and June 9, 2021 (the "Class Period"), but excluding Redeeming
Stockholders and the other Excluded Persons (as defined in the
Stipulation and the Notice) (the "Class").1

PLEASE READ THIS SUMMARY NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE
AFFECTED BY A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PENDING IN THIS COURT.

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware (the "Court"), that the
above-captioned stockholder class action (the "Action") is pending
in the Court.

YOU ARE ALSO NOTIFIED that plaintiff (i) Cody Laidlaw
("Plaintiff"), on behalf of himself and the Class; (ii) defendants
Avi S. Katz, Raluca Dinu, Neil Miotto, John Mikulsky, Gil Frostig
and GigAcquisitions2, LLC (collectively, the "Defendants"); and
(iii) New UpHealth (together with Plaintiff and Defendants, the
"Parties") have reached a proposed settlement of the Action for
$7,250,000 in cash (the "Settlement Amount") as set forth in the
Stipulation (the "Settlement"), a copy of which is available at
www.uphealthstockholderlitigation.com. The Settlement, if approved
by the Court, will resolve all claims in the Action.

A hearing (the "Settlement Hearing") will be held on October 8,
2024 at 1:30 p.m., before The Honorable Lori W. Will, Vice
Chancellor, either in person at the Court of Chancery of the State
of Delaware, Leonard L. Williams Justice Center, 500 North King
Street, Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, or remotely by telephone or
videoconference (in the discretion of the Court), to, among other
things: (i) determine whether to finally certify the Class for
settlement purposes only, pursuant to Court of Chancery Rules
23(a), 23(b)(1), and 23(b)(2); (ii) determine whether Plaintiff and
Plaintiff's Counsel have adequately represented the Class, and
whether Plaintiff should be finally appointed as Class
representative for the Class and Plaintiff's Counsel should be
finally appointed as Class counsel for the Class; (iii) determine
whether the proposed Settlement should be approved as fair,
reasonable, and adequate to the Class and in the best interests of
the Class; (iv) determine whether the Action should be dismissed
with prejudice and the Releases provided under the Stipulation
should be granted; (v) determine whether the Order and Final
Judgment approving the Settlement should be entered; (vi) determine
whether the proposed Plan of Allocation of the Net Settlement Fund
is fair and reasonable, and should therefore be approved; (vii)
determine whether and in what amount any Fee and Expense Award
should be paid to Plaintiff's Counsel out of the Settlement Fund;
(viii) hear and rule on any objections to the Settlement, the
proposed Plan of Allocation, and/or Plaintiff's Counsel's
application for a Fee and Expense Award; and (ix) consider any
other matters that may properly be brought before the Court in
connection with the Settlement. Any updates regarding the
Settlement Hearing, including any changes to the date or time of
the hearing or updates regarding in-person or remote appearances at
the hearing, will be posted to the Settlement website,
www.uphealthstockholderlitigation.com.

If you are a member of the Class, your rights will be affected by
the pending Action and the Settlement, and you may be entitled to
share in the Net Settlement Fund. If you have not yet received the
Notice, you may obtain a copy of the Notice by contacting the
Settlement Administrator at Gig2 Stockholders Litigation, c/o A.B.
Data, Ltd., P.O. Box 170340, Milwaukee, WI 53217, 1-800-985-7155,
info@uphealthstockholderlitigation.com.  A copy of the Notice can
also be downloaded from the Settlement website,
www.uphealthstockholderlitigation.com.

If the Settlement is approved by the Court and the Effective Date
occurs, the Net Settlement Fund will be distributed on a pro rata
basis to Eligible Class Members in accordance with the terms of the
proposed Plan of Allocation stated in the Notice or such other plan
of allocation as is approved by the Court. Pursuant to the proposed
Plan of Allocation, each Eligible Class Member will be eligible to
receive a pro rata payment from the Net Settlement Fund equal to
the product of (a) the Net Settlement Fund; and (b) a fraction, the
numerator of which is the number of Eligible Shares held by the
Eligible Class Member, and the denominator of which is a number
representing the total number of Eligible Shares ("Cash Payment").
As explained in further detail in the Notice at Paragraphs 32-40,
Eligible Class Members do not have to submit a claim form to
receive a payment from the Settlement.

Any objections to the Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation,
or Plaintiff's Counsel's application for the Fee and Expense Award
must be filed with the Register in Chancery in the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware and delivered to Plaintiff's
Counsel, Defendants' Counsel, and Company Counsel such that they
are received no later than September 24, 2024, in accordance with
the instructions set forth in the Notice.

Please do not contact the Court or the Office of the Register in
Chancery regarding this Summary Notice. All questions about this
Summary Notice, the Settlement, or your eligibility to participate
in the Settlement should be directed to the Settlement
Administrator or Lead Counsel.

Requests for the Notice should be made to the Settlement
Administrator:

Gig2 Stockholders Litigation
c/o A.B. Data, Ltd.
P.O. Box 170340
Milwaukee, WI 53217
Telephone: 1-800-985-7155
Email: info@uphealthstockholderlitigation.com
Website: www.uphealthstockholderlitigation.com

Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice, should be made to
Plaintiff's Counsel:

Michael J. Barry, Esq.
Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.
123 Justison Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Telephone: (302) 622-7000
Email: mbarry@gelaw.com

BY ORDER OF THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF
DELAWARE:

Dated: August 16, 2024

1 Any capitalized terms used in this Summary Notice that are not
otherwise defined in this Summary Notice shall have the meanings
given to them in the Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise,
Settlement, and Release between Plaintiffs, Defendants, and the
Company, dated March 13, 2024 (the "Stipulation"). Copies of the
Stipulation and the full Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement
of Stockholder Class Action, Settlement Hearing, and Right to
Appear (the "Notice") are available at the Settlement website,
www.uphealthstockholderlitigation.com.


GIGACQUISITIONS4 LLC: $2.5MM Settlement to be Heard on oct. 8
-------------------------------------------------------------
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY,

                                      Plaintiff,

                   v.

GIGACQUISITIONS4, LLC, AVI S.
KATZ, RALUCA DINU, NEIL MIOTTO,
ANDREA BETTI-BERUTTO, DOROTHY
D. HAYES, AND BRAD WEIGHTMAN,

                                      Defendants.

C.A. No. 2023-0685-LWW

SUMMARY NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER CLASS ACTION,
SETTLEMENT HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR

TO:

All record and beneficial holders of BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.
f/k/a GigCapital4, Inc. ("New BigBear" or the "Company") common
stock who held such shares between the close of business on October
5, 2021 and December 7, 2021 (the "Class Period"), but excluding
the Excluded Persons (as defined in the Stipulation and the Notice)
(the "Class").1

PLEASE READ THIS SUMMARY NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE
AFFECTED BY A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PENDING IN THIS COURT.

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware (the "Court"), that the
above-captioned stockholder class action (the "Action") is pending
in the Court.

YOU ARE ALSO NOTIFIED that plaintiff (i) Stephen Bushansky
("Plaintiff"), on behalf of himself and the Class; (ii) defendants
Avi S. Katz, Raluca Dinu, Neil Miotto, Andrea Betti-Berutto,
Dorothy D. Hayes, Brad Weightman and GigAcquisitions4, LLC
(collectively, the "Defendants"); and (iii) New BigBear (together
with Plaintiff and Defendants, the "Parties") have reached a
proposed settlement of the Action for $2,500,000 in cash (the
"Settlement Amount") as set forth in the Stipulation (the
"Settlement"), a copy of which is available at
www.bigbearstockholdersettlement.com. The Settlement, if approved
by the Court, will resolve all claims in the Action.

A hearing (the "Settlement Hearing") will be held on October 8,
2024 at 1:30 p.m., before The Honorable Lori W. Will, Vice
Chancellor, either in person at the Court of Chancery of the State
of Delaware, Leonard L. Williams Justice Center, 500 North King
Street, Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, or remotely by telephone or
videoconference (in the discretion of the Court), to, among other
things: (i) determine whether to finally certify the Class for
settlement purposes only, pursuant to Court of Chancery Rules
23(a), 23(b)(1), and 23(b)(2); (ii) determine whether Plaintiff and
Plaintiff's Counsel have adequately represented the Class, and
whether Plaintiff should be finally appointed as Class
representative for the Class and Plaintiff's Counsel should be
finally appointed as Class counsel for the Class; (iii) determine
whether the proposed Settlement should be approved as fair,
reasonable, and adequate to the Class and in the best interests of
the Class; (iv) determine whether the Action should be dismissed
with prejudice and the Releases provided under the Stipulation
should be granted; (v) determine whether the Order and Final
Judgment approving the Settlement should be entered; (vi) determine
whether the proposed Plan of Allocation of the Net Settlement Fund
is fair and reasonable, and should therefore be approved; (vii)
determine whether and in what amount any Fee and Expense Award
should be paid to Plaintiff's Counsel out of the Settlement Fund;
(viii) hear and rule on any objections to the Settlement, the
proposed Plan of Allocation, and/or Plaintiff's Counsel's
application for a Fee and Expense Award; and (ix) consider any
other matters that may properly be brought before the Court in
connection with the Settlement. Any updates regarding the
Settlement Hearing, including any changes to the date or time of
the hearing or updates regarding in-person or remote appearances at
the hearing, will be posted to the Settlement website,
www.bigbearstockholdersettlement.com.

If you are a member of the Class, your rights will be affected by
the pending Action and the Settlement, and you may be entitled to
share in the Net Settlement Fund. If you have not yet received the
Notice, you may obtain a copy of the Notice by contacting the
Settlement Administrator at Gig4 Stockholders Litigation, c/o A.B.
Data, Ltd., P.O. Box 173138, Milwaukee, WI 53217, 1-877-316-0168,
info@bigbearstockholdersettlement.com.  A copy of the Notice can
also be downloaded from the Settlement website,
www.bigbearstockholdersettlement.com.

If the Settlement is approved by the Court and the Effective Date
occurs, the Net Settlement Fund will be distributed on a pro rata
basis to Eligible Class Members in accordance with the terms of the
proposed Plan of Allocation stated in the Notice or such other plan
of allocation as is approved by the Court. Pursuant to the proposed
Plan of Allocation, each Eligible Class Member will be eligible to
receive a pro rata payment from the Net Settlement Fund equal to
the product of (a) the Net Settlement Fund; and (b) a fraction, the
numerator of which is the number of Eligible Shares held by the
Eligible Class Member, and the denominator of which is a number
representing the total number of Eligible Shares ("Cash Payment").
As explained in further detail in the Notice at Paragraphs 32-40,
Eligible Class Members do not have to submit a claim form to
receive a payment from the Settlement.

Any objections to the Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation,
or Plaintiff's Counsel's application for the Fee and Expense Award
must be filed with the Register in Chancery in the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware and delivered to Plaintiff's
Counsel, Defendants' Counsel, and Company Counsel such that they
are received no later than September 24, 2024, in accordance with
the instructions set forth in the Notice.

Please do not contact the Court or the Office of the Register in
Chancery regarding this Summary Notice. All questions about this
Summary Notice, the Settlement, or your eligibility to participate
in the Settlement should be directed to the Settlement
Administrator or Lead Counsel.

Requests for the Notice should be made to the Settlement
Administrator:

Gig4 Stockholders Litigation
c/o A.B. Data, Ltd.
P.O. Box 173138
Milwaukee, WI 53217
Telephone: 1-877-316-0168
Email: info@bigbearstockholdersettlement.com
Website: www.bigbearstockholdersettlement.com

Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice, should be made to
Plaintiff's Counsel:

Michael J. Barry, Esq.
Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.
123 Justison Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Telephone: (302) 622-7000
Email: mbarry@gelaw.com

Dated: August 16, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT OF
CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:

1 Any capitalized terms used in this Summary Notice that are not
otherwise defined in this Summary Notice shall have the meanings
given to them in the Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise,
Settlement, and Release between Plaintiff, Defendants, and the
Company, dated July 15, 2024 (the "Stipulation"). Copies of the
Stipulation and the full Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement
of Stockholder Class Action, Settlement Hearing, and Right to
Appear (the "Notice") are available at the Settlement website,
www.bigbearstockholdersettlement.com.


HYRECAR INC:$1.9MM Class Settlement to be Heard on November 14
--------------------------------------------------------------
Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP announced that the United States
District Court for the Central District of California has approved
the following announcement of a proposed settlement that would
benefit purchasers of HyreCar Inc. publicly traded common stock
(OTCMKTS: HYREQ):

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No. 2:21-cv-06918-FWS-JC

Honorable Fred W. Slaughter

IVAN BARON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated,
Plaintiff,

v.

HYRECAR INC., JOSEPH FURNARI and ROBERT SCOTT BROGI,
Defendants.

SUMMARY NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING;
AND (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES
AND REIMBURSEMENT OF LITIGATION EXPENSES

TO: All persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired
the publicly traded common stock of HyreCar Inc. from May 13, 2021
through August 10, 2021, both dates inclusive, and were damaged
thereby[1] (the "Settlement Class"):

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY
A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PENDING IN THIS COURT.

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure and an Order of the United States District Court
for the Central District of California, that the above-captioned
litigation (the "Action") has been certified as a class action on
behalf of the Settlement Class, except for certain persons and
entities who are excluded from the Settlement Class by definition
as set forth in the full Notice of (I) Pendency of Class Action and
Proposed Settlement; (II) Settlement Fairness Hearing; and (III)
Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Reimbursement of
Litigation Expenses (the "Notice").

YOU ARE ALSO NOTIFIED that Lead Plaintiff in the Action has reached
a proposed settlement of the Action for $1,900,000.00 in cash (the
"Settlement"), that, if approved, will resolve all claims in the
Action.

A hearing will be held on November 14, 2024 at 10:00 a.m., before
the Honorable Fred W. Slaughter at the Ronald Reagan Federal
Building and United States Courthouse, Courtroom 10D, 411 West 4th
Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701, to determine: (i) whether the proposed
Settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate;
(ii) whether the Action should be dismissed with prejudice, and the
Releases specified and described in the Stipulation (and in the
Notice) should be granted; (iii) whether the proposed Plan of
Allocation should be approved as fair and reasonable; and (iv)
whether Lead Counsel's application for an award of attorneys' fees
and reimbursement of expenses should be approved.

If you are a member of the Settlement Class, your rights will be
affected by the pending Action and the Settlement, and you may be
entitled to share in the Settlement Fund. The Notice and Proof of
Claim and Release Form ("Claim Form") can be downloaded from the
website maintained by the Claims Administrator,
www.HyreCarSecuritiesSettlement.com. You may also obtain copies of
the Notice and Claim Form by contacting the Claims Administrator at
Ivan Baron v. HyreCar Inc. et al., c/o Strategic Claims Services,
P.O. Box 230, 600 N. Jackson Street, Suite 205, Media, PA 19063,
866-274-4004.

If you are a member of the Settlement Class, in order to be
eligible to receive a payment under the proposed Settlement, you
must submit a Claim Form online at
www.HyreCarSecuritiesSettlement.com or postmarked no later than
December 14, 2024. If you are a Settlement Class Member and do not
submit a proper Claim Form, you will not be eligible to share in
the distribution of the net proceeds of the Settlement, but you
will nevertheless be bound by any judgments or orders entered by
the Court in the Action.

If you are a member of the Settlement Class and wish to exclude
yourself from the Settlement Class, you must submit a request for
exclusion such that it is received no later than October 24, 2024,
in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice. If you
properly exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you will not
be bound by any judgments or orders entered by the Court in the
Action and you will not be eligible to share in the proceeds of the
Settlement.

Any objections to the proposed Settlement, the proposed Plan of
Allocation, or Lead Counsel's motion for attorneys' fees and
reimbursement of expenses, must be filed with the Court and
delivered to Lead Counsel and Individual Defendants' Counsel such
that they are received no later than October 24, 2024, in
accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice.

Please do not contact the Court, the Clerk's office, HyreCar, the
Individual Defendants, or Individual Defendants' Counsel regarding
this notice. All questions about this notice, the proposed
Settlement, or your eligibility to participate in the Settlement
should be directed to Lead Counsel or the Claims Administrator.

Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice and Claim Form,
should be made to Lead Counsel:

GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
Ex Kano S. Sams II, Esq.
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90067
(310) 201-9150
info@glancylaw.com

Requests for the Notice and Claim Form should be made to:

Ivan Baron v. HyreCar Inc., et al.
c/o Strategic Claims Services
P.O. Box 230
600 N. Jackson St., Ste. 205
Media, PA 19063
Tel.: 866-274-4004
www.HyreCarSecuritiesSettlement.com

By Order of the Court

1 All capitalized terms used in this Summary Notice that are not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them
in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated March 20, 2024
(the "Stipulation"), which is available at
www.HyreCarSecuritiesSettlement.com.


INSPIRATO INC: Continues to Defend Koch Class Suit in Colorado
--------------------------------------------------------------
Inspirato Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 13, 2024, that the Company continues to defend
itself from the Koch class suit in the United States District Court
for the District of Colorado.

On February 16, 2023, a class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S.
District Court in the District of Colorado captioned Keith Koch,
Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v.
Inspirato Incorporated, Brent Handler, and R. Webster Neighbor.

The complaint alleged violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange
Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder against all defendants,
and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against the individual
defendants.

The complaint generally alleged that certain of the Company's prior
public statements about its results of operations and financial
condition were materially false and misleading because they
misrepresented and failed to disclose adverse facts pertaining to
the restatement of the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and
June 30, 2022.

On July 16, 2024, the magistrate recommended the case be dismissed
and the plaintiff filed objections to these recommendations on July
30, 2024.

The Company responded to these objections on August 13, 2024 and
expects the Court to dismiss the shareholder lawsuit.

Inspirato Incorporated and its subsidiaries is a subscription-based
luxury travel company that provides exclusive access to branded
luxury vacation homes, accommodations at five-star hotel and resort
partners, and custom travel experiences.





INVIVYD INC: Continues to Defend Brill Securities Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
Invivyd Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 13, 2024, that the Company continues to defend
itself from the Brill securities class suit in the United States
District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

On January 31, 2023, a securities class action lawsuit captioned
Brill v. Invivyd, Inc., et. al., Case No. 1:23-CV-10254-LTS, was
filed against the Company and certain of its former officers in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

The complaint alleges violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the
Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder on the basis of
purportedly materially false and misleading statements and
omissions concerning ADG20’s effectiveness against the Omicron
variant of COVID-19.

The complaint seeks, among other things, unspecified damages,
attorneys' fees, expert fees, and other costs.

The court appointed lead plaintiffs for the action on June 28,
2023.

On August 23, 2023, the lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint
that makes allegations similar to those in the original complaint
and asserts the same claims against the same defendants as the
original complaint.

On October 19, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation to
advise the court that the lead plaintiffs intended to seek leave to
file a second amended complaint, and on November 22, 2023, the lead
plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint that makes allegations
similar to those in the prior complaints and asserts the same
claims against the same defendants as the prior complaints.

On January 12, 2024, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the
second amended complaint in its entirety. The lead plaintiffs filed
an opposition to the motion to dismiss on February 26, 2024, and
the defendants filed a reply in further support of their motion to
dismiss on March 27, 2024.

The court heard oral arguments on the defendants’ motion to
dismiss on May 10, 2024, and took the matter under advisement.

The Company believes that is has strong defenses, and intends to
vigorously defend against this action.

The lawsuit is in early stages, and, at this time, no assessment
can be made as to the likely outcome or whether the outcome will be
material to the Company.

Invivyd, Inc., f/k/a Adagio Therapeutics, Inc., is a
clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company.[BN]




KATAPULT HOLDINGS: Settlement in Securities Suit for Court Approval
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Katapult Holdings Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 13, 2024, that the settlement in a
securities class suit is subject to the approval of the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

On August 27, 2021, a putative class action lawsuit, captioned
McIntosh v. Katapult Holdings, Inc., et al, was filed in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "New York
Action"). The operative second amended complaint was filed on
November 4, 2022 against Katapult Holdings, Inc., three current and
former Company officers, and two FinServ officers. The second
amended complaint alleges violations of Sections 10(b), 14(a), and
20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and seeks an
unspecified amount of damages on behalf of persons and entities
that (a) beneficially owned and/or held FinServ common stock as of
the close of business on May 11, 2021 and were eligible to vote at
FinServ's June 7, 2021 special meeting (the "FinServ Putative
Class"); or (b) purchased or otherwise acquired Katapult securities
between June 15, 2021 and August 9, 2021, inclusive (the "Katapult
Putative Class"). On May 26, 2022, the Court appointed a lead
plaintiff, but on August 8, 2023, the court dismissed the Katapult
Putative Class's claims which were under Sections 10(b) and 20(a)
and dismissed two current and former Company officers from the
case. The Court declined to dismiss certain of the FinServ Putative
Class's claims under Sections 14(a) and 20(a).

On August 25, 2022, a purported Company stockholder filed a
putative class action lawsuit, captioned Saunders v. Einbinder, et
al., against directors and officers of FinServ Acquisition Corp.
("FinServ") and FinServ Holdings LLC in the Delaware Court of
Chancery (the “Delaware Action”). The operative amended
complaint was filed on January 27, 2023, alleging that defendants
breached their fiduciary duties by making false and misleading
disclosures to induce FinServ stockholders to approve FinServ’s
merger with Katapult. On March 13, 2023, the Court granted the
parties' stipulation to dismiss FinServ Holdings LLC from the case
and amended the caption as In re FinServ Acquisition Corp. SPAC
Litigation.

On May 20, 2024, the Company reached an agreement in principle to
settle for total consideration of $12,000, comprised of: (1) a cash
component of $8,500 (the "Cash Component"); and (2) an additional
component of $3,500 comprised of the Company's common stock (the
"Settlement Shares") and/or cash (the "Additional Component"). As
previously disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company had accrued a
$12,000 liability, including a $5,000 litigation insurance
reimbursement receivable, on its balance sheet for the year ended
December 31, 2023 for the New York Action and the Delaware Action.
These amounts are included in the condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of June 30, 2024. A portion of the Cash Component of
$6,725, with $5,000 paid by the insurer, and $2,775 of the
Additional Component, will be allocated to the Delaware Action
settlement class and $1,775 of the Cash Component and $725,000 of
the Additional Component will be allocated to the New York Action
settlement class.

The number of Settlement Shares for the Delaware Action (the
"Delaware Settlement Shares") shall be calculated by dividing
$2,775 by the volume-weighted average per share price ("VWAP") of
the Company's common stock for the ten (10) consecutive trading
days immediately preceding the date of the hearing on the final
approval for the Delaware Action (the "Delaware Settlement Hearing
VWAP"); in calculating the Delaware Settlement Shares (1) to the
extent the Delaware Settlement Shares are less than 167,797, the
difference between the Delaware Settlement Shares and 167,797 shall
be the "Delaware Unused Shares" and (2) any amount of Delaware
Settlement Shares above 167,797 shall be considered the "Delaware
Excess Settlement Shares." For the settlement of the Delaware
Action, the Company may either deliver the Delaware Excess
Settlement Shares (reduced by the New York Unused Shares (as
defined below)) or pay in cash the full value of the Delaware
Excess Settlement Shares (reduced by the New York Unused Shares),
calculated by multiplying the number of Delaware Excess Settlement
Shares (reduced by the New York Unused Shares) by the Delaware
Settlement Hearing VWAP. The number of Settlement Shares for the
New York Action (the "New York Settlement Shares") shall be
calculated by dividing $725,000 by the VWAP of the Company's common
stock for the ten (10) consecutive trading days immediately
preceding the date of the hearing on final approval for the New
York Action (the "New York Settlement Hearing VWAP"); in
calculating the New York Settlement Shares (1) to the extent the
New York Settlement Shares are less than 43,839, the difference
between the New York Settlement Shares and 43,839 shall be the "New
York Unused Shares" and (2) any amount of New York Settlement
Shares above 43,839 shall be considered the "New York Excess
Settlement Shares." For the settlement of the New York Action, the
Company may either deliver the New York Excess Settlement Shares
(reduced by the Delaware Unused Shares) or pay in cash the full
value of the New York Excess Settlement Shares (reduced by the
Delaware Unused Shares), calculated by multiplying the number of
New York Excess Settlement Shares (reduced by the Delaware Unused
Shares) by the New York Settlement Hearing VWAP.

As part of the settlement, the parties will ask the Southern
District of New York and the Delaware Court of Chancery to stay the
proceedings pending negotiation and approval by each respective
court of the proposed settlement. In agreeing to settle, the
Company is making no admission of liability. On July 3, 2024, a
motion for preliminary approval was filed in the Southern District
of New York and a settlement stipulation and proposed scheduling
order was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery. On July 17,
2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery approved the scheduling order
and set a settlement hearing date of October 10, 2024. On July 24,
2024, the Southern District of New York approved the scheduling
order and set a settlement hearing date of January 23, 2025. The
settlement of each of the New York Action and the Delaware Action
depends upon approval by the Southern District of New York and the
Delaware Court of Chancery, as applicable.

There can be no assurance the settlement of the New York Action
will be approved by the Southern District of New York or the
settlement of the Delaware Action will be approved by the Delaware
Court of Chancery.

Katapult Holdings, Inc. is an e-commerce focused financial
technology company, provides e-commerce point-of-sale
lease-purchase options for nonprime consumers in the United
States. The company's technology platform provides nonprime
consumers with a lease purchase option to enable them to obtain
durable goods from its network of e-commerce merchants. The company
was formerly known as Cognical Holdings, Inc. and changed its name
to Katapult
Holdings, Inc. in February 2020. The company is headquartered in
Plano, Texas.



LFTD PARTNERS: Continues to Defend Perry Class Suit
---------------------------------------------------
Lftd Partners Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 14, 2024, that the company continues
to defend itself from the Perry class suit in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

Loree Perry, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated v. Sheikhani Group, et al – Plaintiff added the Company
and four of its officers to a putative class action case against a
Texas retailer, several cannabis industry manufacturers, testing
companies, and related individuals in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

The Amended Complaint alleges that Plaintiff bought two of the
Company's vape cartridge products and that the delta-9-THC
cannabinoid content of those and additional unspecified "many" of
the Company's other products was underreported.

The Amended Complaint alleges that all of the Defendants
misrepresent the nature of their products and are intentionally
engaging in ongoing illegal sales.

The Amended Complaint asserts seven causes of action including a
civil RICO claim and alleges the existence of 1,000 "John Doe"
defendants.

The Company contends that this lawsuit is without merit and intends
to vigorously defend the action.

Publicly traded LFTD Partners Inc. (OTCQB: LIFD), headquartered in
Jacksonville, Fla., is the parent corporation of Lifted Made, based
in Kenosha, WI. Lifted Made manufactures and sells hemp-derived
and
other psychoactive products under its award-winning Urb Finest
Flowers brand. The company is the worldwide, exclusive manufacturer
and seller of Diamond Supply Co. and Cali Sweets hemp-derived
products.

LINCOLN NATIONAL: Provisional Settlement in Glover for Court OK
---------------------------------------------------------------
Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. disclosed in its Form 10-Q
Report for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2024, that the
Glover class suit provisional settlement is subject to the
preliminary and final approval of the United District Court for the
District of Connecticut.

Glover v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and The
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, filed in the U.S. District
Court for the District of Connecticut, No. 3:16-cv-00827, is a
putative class action that was served on LNL on June 8, 2016.

Plaintiff is the owner of a universal life insurance policy who
alleges that LNL charged more for non-guaranteed cost of insurance
than permitted by the policy. Plaintiff seeks to represent all
universal life and variable universal life policyholders who owned
policies containing non-guaranteed cost of insurance provisions
that are similar to those of plaintiff's policy and seeks damages
on behalf of all such policyholders.

On January 11, 2019, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint in
its entirety.

In response, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend the
complaint, which, on September 25, 2023, the court granted in part
and denied in part.

Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on October 10, 2023.

On March 7, 2024, the parties entered into a settlement agreement,
which is subject to court approval.

The provisional settlement encompasses policies that are at issue
in the Glover case, which also includes all policies in the
lawsuits captioned TVPX ARS INC., as Securities Intermediary for
Consolidated Wealth Management, LTD. v. The Lincoln National Life
Insurance Company and Vida Longevity Fund, LP v. Lincoln Life &
Annuity Company of New York, both of which are described below, and
one additional case to which an affiliate of LNL is a party,
Iwanski v. First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance Company, which has
been previously disclosed by our parent company, LNC.

The Glover plaintiffs' motion for preliminary approval of the
provisional settlement was filed on March 8, 2024, and a hearing on
the motion was held on July 30, 2024.

The provisional settlement, which is subject to both preliminary
and final approval of the court, consists of a $147.5 million
pre-tax cash payment for Glover class members (inclusive of all
policyholders in TVPX ARS INC., Vida and Iwanski).

The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company provides insurance
services. The Company focuses on life insurance, annuities,
accident, health, dental, accident, critical illness, group
benefits, individual and group retirement plans. Lincoln National
Life Insurance serves customers in the United States. The company
is based in Fort Wayne, Indiana.








MDL 2903: Settlement in Flores v. Fisher-Price Wins Initial Nod
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Karen Flores v.
Fisher-Price, Inc., Case No. 1:19-cv-01076 (W.D.N.Y.), the Hon.
Judge Geoffrey Crawford entered an order granting motion for
preliminary certification of a settlement class and approval of
class action settlement:

The proposed settlement class consist of:

   "All Persons in the United States, the District of Columbia,
Puerto
   Rico, and all other United States territories and/or possessions

   who, during the Class Period, (a) purchased (including to be
given
   as a gift to another Person) or acquired (by gift) an RNPS, or
(b)
   have an RNPS in their possession."

   Excluded from the class are

(i) Persons who participated in the Recall and received a cash
    fund;

      (ii) Persons who purchased an RNPS for the sole purpose of
           resale to consumers at wholesale or retail;

     (iii) Defendants, their subsidiaries, and their legal
           representatives, successors, assignees, officers,
directors
           and employees;

      (iv) Plaintiff's counsel; and

       (v) judicial officers and their immediate family members and

           associated court staff assigned to this case.

   In addition, persons or entities are not Settlement Class
Members
   once they timely and properly exclude themselves from the Class,
as
   provided in this Settlement Agreement, and once the exclusion
   request id finally approved by the Court.

The Court appoints class counsel:

          Demet Basar, Esq.
          James Eubank, Esq.
          Paul Evans, Esq.
          BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES
          P.C., 218 Commerce Street
          Montgomery, AL 36104
          Telephone: (800) 898-2034
          E-mail: Demet.Basar@BeasleyAllen.com
                  James.Eubank@BeasleyAllen.com
                  Paul.Evans@BeasleyAllen.com

The court appoints the following persons as class representatives
for the proposed settlement class: Elizabeth Alfaro, Emily Barton,
Linda Black, Luke Cuddy, Rebecca Drover, Megan Fieker, Karen
Flores, Nancy Hanson, Jena Huey, Samantha Jacoby, Megan Kaden,
Kerry Mandley, Cassandra Mulvey, Joshua Nadel, Melanie Nilius
Nowlin, Daniel Pasternacki,  Jessie Poppe, Katherine Shaffer, Emily
Simmonds, Josie Willis and Renee Wray.

The Court appoints Kroll Settlement Administration LLC as
Settlement Administrator.

The Flores case is consolidated in MDL 2903 United States Judicial
Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 2903) re: Fisher-Price Rock
'N Play Sleeper Marketing, Sales Practices, and products liability
litigation.

These actions share factual questions arising from allegations that
Fisher-Price's Rock 'n Play Sleeper (RNPS) is unsafe because, among
other reasons, its angled design does not allow infants to sleep in
a supine position, which allegedly increases the risk that infants
will
suffer from positional asphyxia, plagiocephaly, and torticollis.

The Plaintiffs uniformly allege that the defendants' advertising
and marketing for the RNPS was false and misleading, and that
Fisher Price's April 2019 recall of the RNPS was deficient.

Fisher-Price is an American company that produces educational toys
for infants, toddlers and preschoolers.

A copy of the Court's order dated Aug. 26, 2024, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=9KQ0vz at no extra
charge.[CC]

MDL 2992: Plaintiffs Seek to Certify Class Action
--------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit re Bank of America California
Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB
(S.D. Cal.), the Plaintiffs, on Jan. 17, 2025, will move the Court
for an Order:

-- certifying this action as a class action on behalf of the
    Plaintiffs and the five classes:

    Claim Denial Class:

    "All Bank of America EDD cardholders who notified the Bank that
an
    unauthorized transaction had occurred on their Bank of America
EDD
    debit card account ("Claim") at an automated teller machine
    ("ATM"), and whose Claim the Bank denied or closed at any time

    from Sept. 28, 2020 through June 8, 2021, based solely on
    Indicator 1 of the Bank's Claim Fraud Filter ("CFF")";

    Credit Rescission Class:

    "All Bank of America EDD cardholders who received permanent
credit
    from the Bank in connection with their Claim, which credit the

    Bank rescinded at any time from Sept. 28, 2020 through June 8,

    2021, based solely on Indicator 1 of the Bank's CFF";

    Account Freeze Class:

    "All Bank of America EDD cardholders whose EDD debit card
account
    the Bank froze at any time from Sept. 28, 2020 through March
17,
    2021, based solely on Indicator 1 of the Bank's CFF, and whose

    Account the Bank (i) subsequently unfroze, or (ii) subsequently

    converted from frozen to blocked status on or after March 18,
2021
    and then unblocked";

    Customer Service Class:

    "All members of the Claim Denial class and/or the Credit
    Rescission class who telephoned the Bank's customer service
    telephone number for its EDD cardholders at any time from
    Sept. 13, 2020 through Nov. 21, 2020, and whose telephone call
was
    routed to the Bank's Claims call center";

    EMV Chip Class:

    "All members of the Claim Denial class and/or Credit
Rescission
    class whose EDD debit card did not include an EMV chip prior to

    June 9, 2021";

    Excluded from each class is any person whom the Bank has
    determined, pursuant to its Remediation Plan with the United
    States Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and Office
of
    the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC);

    Also excluded from each class is any person whose Claim or
Account
    the Bank closed, in whole or in part, because the State of
    California requested the Bank to close that person's Claim or
    Account;

-- appointing the Plaintiffs as class representatives for each of

    those classes; and

-- appointing Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP and Altshuler Berzon
LLP
    to serve as co-lead class counsel.

Plaintiffs seek the appointment of Plaintiffs Koole, McClure, Moon,
Oosthuizen, Rivera, Willrich, and Yuan as class representatives for
the Claim Denial class; the appointment of Plaintiffs Chong and
Moore as class representatives for the Credit Rescission class; the
appointment of Plaintiffs Chong, Koole, McClure, Moon, Moore,
Rivera, and Yuan as class representatives for the Account Freeze
class; the appointment of Plaintiffs Chong, Moon, Moore,
Oosthuizen, Willrich, and Yuan as class representatives for the
Customer Service class; and the appointment of Plaintiffs Chong,
Koole, McClure, Moon, Moore, Oosthuizen, Rivera, Willrich, and Yuan
as class representatives for the EMV Chip class.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated Aug. 29, 2024, is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=zNLHwu at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Joseph W. Cotchett, Esq.
          Karin B. Swope, Esq.
          Brian Danitz, Esq.
          Andrew F. Kirtley, Esq.
          Vasti S. Montiel, Esq.
          COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP
          840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
          Burlingame, CA 94010
          Telephone: (650) 697-6000
          Facsimile: (650) 697-0577
          E-mail: jcotchett@cpmlegal.com
                  bdanitz@cpmlegal.com
                  kswope@cpmlegal.com
                  akirtley@cpmlegal.com
                  vmontiel@cpmlegal.com

                - and -

          Michael Rubin, Esq.
          Stacey M. Leyton, Esq.
          Connie K. Chan, Esq.
          Katherine G. Bass, Esq.
          Colin C. Jones, Esq.
          ALTSHULER BERZON LLP
          177 Post Street, Suite 300
          San Francisco, CA 94108
          Telephone: (415) 421-7151
          Facsimile: (415) 362-8064
          E-mail: mrubin@altber.com
                  sleyton@altber.com
                  cchan@altber.com
                  kbass@altber.com
                  cjones@altber.com

NANO NUCLEAR: Continues to Defend Yang Securities Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
Nano Nuclear Energy Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 13, 2024, that the Company continues
to defend itself from the Yang securities class suit in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

On August 9, 2024, a putative securities class action lawsuit was
filed against us and certain of our officers in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned
Yvette Yang v. Nano Nuclear Energy Inc., et al., No. 1:24-cv-06057
(S.D.N.Y.).

The complaint asserts claims for alleged violations of federal
securities laws related to statements concerning the Company's
business, including the Company's progress toward microreactor
development.

The plaintiff seeks to represent a class of certain persons who
purchased or otherwise acquired the Company's common stock during
the period from May 8, 2024 through July 18, 2024 and seeks
unspecified damages and other relief.

The Company disputes the allegations in the complaint and intends
to defend the case vigorously.

The case is at an early stage and the Company cannot reasonably
estimate the amount of any potential financial loss or cost that
could result from this lawsuit.

NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. operates as a nuclear energy company. The
Company develops portable clean energy solutions utilizing
proprietary reactor designs, intellectual property, and research
methods. [BN]




ONTRAK INC: Continues to Defend Braun Securities Class Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ontrak Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 14, 2024, that the Company continues to defend
itself from the Braun securities class suit in the Superior Court
of California for Los Angeles County.

On February 28, 2022, a purported securities class action was filed
in the Superior Court of California for Los Angeles County,
entitled Braun v. Ontrak, Inc., et al., Case No. 22STCV07174.

The plaintiff filed this action purportedly on behalf of a putative
class of all purchasers of the Series A Preferred Stock pursuant to
Registration Statements and Prospectuses issued in connection with
Ontrak's August 21, 2020 initial public stock offering, its
September 2020 through December 2020 "at market" offering, and its
December 16, 2020 follow-on stock offering (collectively, the
"Preferred Stock Offerings").

The plaintiff brings this action against the Company; its officers:
Terren S. Peizer, Brandon H. LaVerne, and Christopher Shirley; its
board members: Richard A. Berman, Sharon Gabrielson, Gustavo
Giraldo, Katherine B. Quinn, Robert Rebak, Diane Seloff, Michael
Sherman, and Edward Zecchini; and the investment banking firms that
acted as underwriters for the Preferred Stock Offerings: B. Riley
Securities, Inc., Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc., William Blair &
Company, LLC, Aegis Capital Corp., Insperex LLC (f/k/a Incapital
LLC), The Benchmark Company, LLC, Boenning & Scatteredgood, Inc.,
Colliers Securities, LLC, Kingswood Capital Markets, and
ThinkEquity (the "Underwriters").

The plaintiff asserts three causes of action alleging that Ontrak
violated § 11, § 12(a)(2), and § 15 of the Securities Act of
1933, respectively, (1) by failing to disclose facts required to be
disclosed under SEC Regulation S-K items 105 and 303 – that Aetna
had turned off the data feed of customer records to Ontrak citing
dissatisfaction with the Company's value proposition and billing
practices and thereafter submitted a CAP to which Ontrak's senior
executives were unable to effectively respond; and (2) by issuing
allegedly false or misleading statements in its Registration
Statements and Prospectuses: (a) regarding Ontrak's growing
customer base; (b) regarding its ability to scale its operations;
(c) that revenue from a limited number of its customers would
continue; (d) that its services are provided to customers
continuously; (e) that revenue increases were attributable to
continued expansion of the Ontrak program; and (f) regarding the
healthcare experience of its executives.

The plaintiff seeks damages in an indeterminate amount.

On July 7, 2022, the defendants filed demurrers to the complaint.

On October 4, 2022, the Court issued its ruling, allowing the case
to proceed but with a narrowed scope.

Specifically, of the six alleged misleading statements, only two
remain (that Ontrak had a growing "growing customer base" and that
Ontrak's revenue growth was attributed to "[t]he continued
expansion of [its] Ontrak program with [its] existing health plan
customers").

The Court sustained the Company's demurrer to the second cause of
action, for violation of Section 12 of the Securities Act of 1933;
while the Court granted leave to amend the plaintiff determined not
to amend to pursue that claim.

The Company believes that the remaining allegations lack merit and
intends to defend against the action vigorously.

Ontrak, Inc. is an artificial intelligence powered and
telehealth-enabled, virtualized healthcare company with a platform
that provides claim-based analytics and predictive modeling to
provide analytic insights throughout the delivery of personalized
treatment program.




ONTRAK INC: Continues to Defend Consolidated Suit in California
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ontrak Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 14, 2024, that the Company continues to defend
itself from a consolidated securities class suit in the United
States District Court for the Central District of California.

On March 3, 2021, a purported securities class action was filed in
the United States District Court for the Central District of
California, entitled Farhar v. Ontrak, Inc., Case No.
2:21-cv-01987.

On March 19, 2021, another similar lawsuit was filed in the same
court, entitled Yildrim v. Ontrak, Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-02460.

On July 14, 2021, the Court consolidated the two actions under the
Farhar case ("Consolidated Class Action"), appointed Ibinabo Dick
as lead plaintiff, and the Rosen Law Firm as lead counsel.

On August 13, 2021, lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended
complaint.

In the Consolidated Amended Complaint, lead plaintiff, purportedly
on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of Ontrak securities
from August 5, 2020 through February 26, 2021, alleges that the
Company and Terren S. Peizer, Brandon H. LaVerne and Curtis
Medeiros, violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78t(a), and Rule
10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, promulgated thereunder, by
intentionally or recklessly making false and misleading statements
and omissions in various press releases, SEC filings and conference
calls with investors on August 5, 2020 and November 5, 2020.

Specifically, the Consolidated Amended Complaint alleges that the
Company was inappropriately billing its largest customer, Aetna,
causing Aetna to, in May 2020, shut off its data feed to Ontrak,
and, in July 2020, require Ontrak to complete a Corrective Action
Plan ("CAP").

Lead plaintiff alleges that defendants: (1) misrepresented to
investors that the data feed was shut off in July 2020, and that it
was part of Aetna's standard compliance review of all of its
vendors; (2) failed to disclose to investors that Aetna had issued
the CAP; and (3) failed to disclose to investors that Ontrak was
engaging in inappropriate billing practices. Lead plaintiff seeks
certification of a class and monetary damages in an indeterminate
amount.

On September 13, 2021, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the
Consolidated Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim under
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b) and the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u-4, et
seq.

The motion was taken under submission, with no oral argument.

Prior to any ruling being issued on the motion to dismiss, on March
29, 2023, lead plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint.

The Second Amended Complaint (1) adds Jonathan Mayhew as a
defendant; (2) expands the purported class period to August 5, 2020
through August 19, 2021; and (3) now includes allegations that the
defendants additionally intentionally or recklessly made false and
misleading statements and omissions regarding the Company's
relationship with its then-second largest customer, Cigna, in
various press releases, SEC filings and conference calls with
investors on May 6, 2021 and August 5, 2021.

On May 15, 2023, the Company filed its motion to dismiss the Second
Amended Complaint.

On February 2, 2024, the Court issued an order granting the
Company's motion to dismiss in its entirety and providing lead
plaintiff leave to amend.

On March 5, 2024, lead plaintiff filed its Third Amended Complaint,
which asserts the same claims, against the same defendants for the
same purported class period.

On March 19, 2024, the Company filed its motion to dismiss the
Third Amended Complaint.

That motion is now fully briefed and has been taken under
submission by the Court.

The Company believes that the allegations lack merit and intends to
defend against the action vigorously.

Ontrak, Inc. is an artificial intelligence powered and
telehealth-enabled, virtualized healthcare company with a platform
that provides claim-based analytics and predictive modeling to
provide analytic insights throughout the delivery of personalized
treatment program.




QUANTUMSCAPE SECURITIES: $47.5MM Settlement to be Heard on Nov. 13
------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE QUANTUMSCAPE SECURITIES CLASS ACTION LITIGATION

Case No. 3:21-cv-00058-WHO

Honorable William H. Orrick III

SUMMARY NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION OF
CLASS, AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING;
AND (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES
AND REIMBURSEMENT OF LITIGATION EXPENSES

TO:

All persons and entities who purchased or otherwise transacted in
securities of QuantumScape Corporation ("QuantumScape") from
November 27, 2020, to April 14, 2021, inclusive:

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY
A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PENDING IN THIS COURT.

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure and an Order of the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California, that the above-captioned
litigation (the "Action") has been certified as a class action for
purposes of the Settlement only on behalf of the Class, except for
certain persons and entities who are excluded from the Class by
definition as set forth in the full Notice of (I) Pendency of Class
Action, Certification of Class, and Proposed Settlement; (II)
Settlement Fairness Hearing; and (III) Motion for an Award of
Attorneys' Fees and Reimbursement of Litigation Expenses (the
"Notice").

YOU ARE ALSO NOTIFIED that Plaintiffs in the Action have reached a
proposed settlement of the Action for $47,500,000 in cash that, if
approved, will resolve all claims asserted or that could have been
asserted in the Action (the "Settlement").

A hearing will be held on November 13, 2024, at 2:00 p.m., before
the Honorable William H. Orrick III at the United States District
Court for the Northern District of California, United States
Courthouse, Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San
Francisco, CA 94102 or via Zoom, to determine (i) whether the
proposed Settlement should be  approved as fair, reasonable, and
adequate; (ii) whether the Action should be dismissed with
prejudice against Defendants, and the releases specified and
described in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated June
11, 2024, (and in the Notice) should be granted; (iii) whether the
proposed Plan of Allocation should be approved as fair, reasonable,
and adequate; and (iv) whether Plaintiffs' Counsel's Fee and
Expense Application should be approved.  The Court reserves the
right to hold the Fairness Hearing telephonically or by other
virtual means.

If you are a member of the Class, your rights will be affected by
the pending Action and the Settlement, and you may be entitled to
share in the Settlement Fund.  The Notice and Proof of Claim and
Release Form ("Claim Form") can be downloaded from the website
maintained by the Claims Administrator,
www.QuantumScapeSettlement.com.  You may also obtain copies of the
Notice and Claim Form by contacting the Claims Administrator at
QuantumScape Corporation Settlement, c/o A.B. Data, Ltd. P.O. Box
173131, Milwaukee, WI 53217, 866-778-9623.

If you are a member of the Class, in order to be eligible to
receive a payment under the proposed Settlement, you must submit a
Claim Form online or postmarked no later than December 13, 2024.
If you are a Class Member and do not submit a proper Claim Form,
you will not be eligible to share in the distribution of the net
proceeds of the Settlement but you will nevertheless be bound by
any judgments or orders entered by the Court in the Action.

If you are a member of the Class and wish to exclude yourself from
the Class, you must submit a request for exclusion such that it is
received no later than October 9, 2024, in accordance with the
instructions set forth in the Notice.  If you properly exclude
yourself from the Class, you will not be bound by any judgments or
orders entered by the Court in the Action and you will not be
eligible to share in the proceeds of the Settlement.

Any objections to the proposed Settlement, the proposed Plan of
Allocation, or Plaintiffs' Counsel's Fee and Expense Application,
must be filed with the Court such that they are received no later
than October 23, 2024, in accordance with the instructions set
forth in the Notice.

Please do not contact the Court, the Clerk's office, Defendants, or
their counsel regarding this notice.  All questions about this
notice, the proposed Settlement, or your eligibility to participate
in the Settlement should be directed to Plaintiffs' Counsel or the
Claims Administrator.

Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice and Claim Form,
should be made to Plaintiffs' Counsel:

LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP
Nicholas Porritt, Esq.
33 Whitehall Street
17th Floor
New York, NY 10004
(212) 363-7500
nporritt@zlk.com

Requests for the Notice and Claim Form should be made to:

QuantumScape Corporation Settlement
A.B. Data, Ltd.
P.O. Box 173131
Milwaukee, WI 53217
www.QuantumScapeSettlement.com  

By Order of the Court


SERITAGE GROWTH: Continues to Defend Zhengxu He Class Suit in N.Y.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Seritage Growth Properties disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for
the quarterly period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2024, that the Company
continues to defend itself from the Zhengxu He class suit in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York.

On July 1, 2024, a purported shareholder of the Company filed a
class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York, captioned Zhengxu He, Trustee of the He &
Fang 2005 Revocable Living Trust v. Seritage Growth Properties,
Case No. 1:24:CV:05007, alleging that the Company, the Company's
Chief Executive Officer, and the Company's Chief Financial Officer
violated the federal securities laws.

The complaint seeks to bring a class action on behalf of all
persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Company
securities between July 7, 2022 and May 10, 2024.

The complaint alleges that the defendants violated federal
securities laws by issuing false, misleading, and/or omissive
disclosures concerning the Company's alleged lack of effective
internal controls regarding the identification and review of
impairment indicators for investments in real estate and the
Company's value and projected gross proceeds of certain real estate
assets.

The complaint seeks compensatory damages in an unspecified amount
to be proven at trial, an award of reasonable costs and expenses to
the plaintiff and class counsel, and such other and further relief
as the court may deem just and proper.

The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against the
allegations.

Headquartered in New York, NY, Seritage operates as a real estate
investment trust. Its Class A Common shares trade on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol "SRG."[BN]

SPRUCE POWER: Continues to Defend XL Fleet Class Suit
-----------------------------------------------------
Spruce Power Holding Corp. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for
the quarterly period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2024, that the Company
continues to defend itself from the XL Fleet stockholder class suit
in the Delaware Court of Chancery.

On September 20, 2021, and October 19, 2021, two class action
complaints were filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery against
certain of the Company's current officers and directors, and the
Company's sponsor of its special purpose acquisition company
merger, Pivotal Investment Holdings II LLC.

These actions were consolidated as in re XL Fleet Corp. (Pivotal)
Stockholder Litigation, C.A. No. 2021-0808, and an amended
complaint was filed on January 31, 2022.

The amended complaint alleges various breaches of fiduciary duty
against the Company and/or its officers, several allegedly
misleading statements made in connection with the merger, and
aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty in connection with
the negotiation and approval of the December 21, 2020 merger and
organization of XL Hybrids, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Legacy
XL") to become XL Fleet Corp.

On September 20, 2021, and October 19, 2021, two class action
complaints were filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery against
certain of the Company's current officers and directors, and the
Company’s sponsor of its special purpose acquisition company
merger, Pivotal Investment Holdings II LLC.

These actions were consolidated as in re XL Fleet Corp. (Pivotal)
Stockholder Litigation, C.A. No. 2021-0808, and an amended
complaint was filed on January 31, 2022.

The amended complaint alleges various breaches of fiduciary duty
against the Company and/or its officers, several allegedly
misleading statements made in connection with the merger, and
aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty in connection with
the negotiation and approval of the December 21, 2020 merger and
organization of XL Hybrids, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Legacy
XL") to become XL Fleet Corp.

The Company believes the allegations asserted in both class action
complaints are without merit and is vigorously defending the
lawsuit.

Spruce Power Holding Corporation and its subsidiaries is an owner
and operator of distributed solar energy assets across the United
States, offering subscription-based services to approximately
75,000 home solar assets and contracts, making renewable energy
more accessible to everyone.

STRONGHOLD DIGITAL: Continues to Defend Winter Class Suit in N.Y.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Stronghold Digital Mining Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report
for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2024, that the
Company continues to defend itself from the Winter class suit in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York.

On April 14, 2022, the Company, and certain of its current and
former directors, officers and underwriters were named in a
putative class action complaint filed in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York (Winter v. Stronghold
Digital Mining, Case No. 1:22-cv-3088).

On August 4, 2022, co-lead plaintiffs were appointed.

On October 18, 2022, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint,
alleging that the Company made misleading statements and/or failed
to disclose material facts in violation of Section 11 of the
Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. §77k and Section 15 of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), about the Company's
business, operations, and prospects in the Company's registration
statement on Form S-1 related to its initial public offering, and
when subsequent disclosures were made regarding these operational
issues when the Company announced its fourth quarter and full year
2021 financial results, the Company's stock price fell, causing
significant losses and damages.

As relief, the plaintiffs are seeking, among other things,
compensatory damages.

The amended complaint also alleged violations of Section 12 of the
Securities Act based on alleged false or misleading statements in
the Company's prospectus related to its initial public offering.

On December 19, 2022, the Company filed a motion to dismiss, which
the court largely denied on August 10, 2023.

On September 8, 2023, the Court entered a Case Management Order,
which set a number of case deadlines, including the completion of
all discovery by April 21, 2025.

On January 19, 2024, the Court granted the motion of one co-lead
plaintiff to withdraw from the case, leaving one plaintiff
remaining.

Plaintiff filed a motion for class certification on February 19,
2024 and defendants' response to that motion is due on June 10,
2024.

The defendants continue to believe the allegations in the complaint
are without merit and intend to defend these suits vigorously.

Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. (NASDAQ: SDIG), a crypto asset
mining company, focuses on mining Bitcoin in the United States. It
also operates coal refuse power generation facility. The company
was incorporated in 2021 and is headquartered in New York, New
York.


TALPHERA INC: Filing of Appellate Opening Brief Due Sept. 27
------------------------------------------------------------
Talphera Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 14, 2024, that the deadline for securities
class suit plaintiffs to file their appellate opening brief is on
September 27, 2024.

On June 8, 2021, a securities class action complaint was filed in
the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
against the Company and two of its officers.

The plaintiff is a purported stockholder of the Company.

The complaint alleged that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and
20(a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5 by making false and
misleading statements and omissions of material fact about the
Company's disclosure controls and procedures with respect to its
marketing of DSUVIA.

The complaint sought unspecified damages, interest, attorneys'
fees, and other costs.

On December 16, 2021, the Court appointed co-lead plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs' amended complaint was filed on March 7, 2022.

The amended complaint named the Company and three of its officers
and continued to allege that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and
20(a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5 by making false and
misleading statements and omissions of material fact about the
Company's disclosure controls and procedures with respect to its
marketing of DSUVIA.

The amended complaint also asserted a violation of Section 20A of
the Exchange Act against the individual defendants for alleged
insider trading.

The amended complaint sought unspecified damages, interest,
attorneys' fees, and other costs.

On September 1, 2022, the Court held oral hearings on the Company's
motion to dismiss the amended complaint with prejudice that was
filed on July 21, 2022.

On September 28, 2022, the Court issued a formal written opinion,
or the First Opinion, dismissing all of the plaintiff's claims
against the Company and the named defendants with leave for
plaintiffs to amend their complaint.

On November 28, 2022, the plaintiffs filed their second amended
complaint.

On July 7, 2023, the Court issued a formal written opinion, or the
Second Opinion, dismissing all of the plaintiff's claims against
the Company and the named defendants with leave for plaintiffs to
amend their complaint in part and without leave to amend in part.

On September 5, 2023, the plaintiffs filed a third amended
complaint.

On May 7, 2024, the Court granted defendants' motion to dismiss the
third amended complaint, with prejudice, and entered judgment for
defendants on plaintiffs' claims.

On June 5, 2024, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal in the United
States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

The deadline for plaintiffs to file their appellate opening brief
is September 27, 2024.

San Mateo, CA-based Talphera, Inc. is a specialty pharmaceutical
company focused on the development and commercialization of
innovative therapies for use in medically supervised settings.




TMC THE METALS CO: Continues to Defend Consolidated Suit in NY
--------------------------------------------------------------
TMC the Metals Co Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 13, 2024, that the Company continues
to defend itself from the consolidated securities class suit in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

On October 28, 2021, a shareholder filed a putative class action
against the Company, one of the Company's executives and a former
director in federal district court for the Eastern District of New
York, captioned Caper v. TMC The Metals Company Inc. F/K/A
Sustainable Opportunities Acquisition Corp., Gerard Barron and
Scott Leonard.

The complaint alleges that all defendants violated Section 10(b) of
the Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and
Messrs. Barron and Leonard violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange
Act, by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to
disclose information about the Company's operations and prospects
during the period from March 4, 2021 and October 5, 2021.

On November 15, 2021, a second complaint containing substantially
the same allegations was filed, captioned Tran v. TMC the Metals
Company, Inc.

These cases have been consolidated. On March 6, 2022, a lead
plaintiff was selected.

An amended complaint was filed on May 12, 2022, reflecting
substantially similar allegations, with the Plaintiff seeking to
recover compensable damages caused by the alleged wrongdoings.

The Company denies any allegations of wrongdoing and filed and
served the plaintiff a motion to dismiss on July 12, 2022 and
intends to defend against this lawsuit.

On July 12, 2023, an oral hearing on the motion to dismiss was
held.

The parties are currently awaiting a ruling.

There is no assurance, however, that the Company or the other
defendants will be successful in its defense of this lawsuit or
that insurance will be available or adequate to fund any settlement
or judgment or the litigation costs of this action.

If the motion to dismiss is unsuccessful, there is a possibility
that the Company may incur a loss in this matter.

TMC the metals company Inc. is a deep-sea minerals exploration
company focused on the collection and processing of polymetallic
nodules found on the seafloor in international waters of the
Clarion Clipperton Zone in the Pacific Ocean), located
approximately 1,300 nautical miles southwest of San Diego,
California.



VERRICA PHARMACEUTICALS: Bid to Dismiss Gorlamari SAC Pending
-------------------------------------------------------------
Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for
the quarterly period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2024, that the bid to dismiss
the Gorlamari second amended complaint is pending in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

On June 6, 2022, plaintiff Kranthi Gorlamari ("Plaintiff") filed a
putative class action complaint captioned Gorlamari v. Verrica
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al., in the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania against the Company and certain of
its current and former officers and directors ("Defendants").

On January 12, 2023, the Plaintiff filed an amended complaint
alleging that Defendants violated federal securities laws by, among
other things, failing to disclose certain manufacturing
deficiencies at the facility where its contract manufacturer
produced bulk solution for the YCANTH (VP-102) drug device and that
such deficiencies posed a risk to the prospects for regulatory
approval of YCANTH (VP-102) for the treatment of molluscum.

The amended complaint seeks unspecified compensatory damages and
other relief on behalf of Plaintiff and all other persons and
entities which purchased or otherwise acquired its securities
between May 19, 2021 and May 24, 2022 (the "Putative Class
Period").

On January 12, 2024, the Court granted in part and denied in part
Defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint.

The Court held that Plaintiff's claims relating to statements made
in May and June 2021 were sufficiently pled, but dismissed
Plaintiff's claims relating to all other statements made during the
Putative Class Period.

On January 26, 2024, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint in
an attempt to cure certain of the deficiencies identified in the
January 12, 2024 ruling.

Defendants' motion to dismiss the second amended complaint was
fully briefed as of April 22, 2024, and is pending before the
Court.

Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc. is a dermatology therapeutics company
developing medications for skin diseases requiring medical
intervention.



VOCODIA HOLDINGS: Continues to Defend TCPA Class Suit
-----------------------------------------------------
Vocodia Holdings Corp. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending June 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 13, 2024, that the Company continues
to defend itself from a TCPA class suit.

On December 20, 2023, an individual filed a putative class action
lawsuit against a customer of the Company that was using the
Company's DISA's.

Shortly thereafter, the individual filed a first amended complaint
(FAC) adding the Company as a party.

The FAC states that Plaintiff's phone number has been on the
National Do-Not-Call Registry since 2009.

Despite this, Plaintiff alleges he received two prerecorded calls
from the Company on behalf of its Customer on October 10 and
November 28, 2023.

Based on these alleged violations, Plaintiff asserts that the
Company violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act's (TCPA)
prerecorded call provision and the South Carolina Telephone Privacy
Protection Act.

In response to the FAC, both the Company and its Customer filed a
motion to dismiss and motion to strike the class allegations.

The motions are fully briefed, but the Court has yet to issue a
ruling.

The parties each exchanged discovery responses.

The parties agreed to attend mediation on October 15, 2024.

The Company denies liability and intends to continue to vigorously
defend any action, although the probability of a favorable or
unfavorable outcome is difficult to estimate as of this date.

Vocodia Holdings Corp operates as a holding company. The Company,
through its subsidiaries, develops and markets an artificial
intelligence sales and customer service platform designed to
automate the sales process. Vocodia Holdings serves customers
worldwide. [BN}

                        Asbestos Litigation

ASBESTOS UPDATE: Claims Coverage Suit Against BNSF, Zurich Dropped
------------------------------------------------------------------
Ronald V. Miller, Jr., writing for The Lawsuit Information Center,
reports that a lawsuit against BNSF Railway Co. and its insurer,
Zurich American Insurance Co., over their handling of
asbestos-related personal injury claims was voluntarily dropped by
the plaintiffs.

The suit was brought by the estates of two individuals who
allegedly died from asbestos exposure at a BNSF-owned rail yard in
Libby, Montana. Filed in August, the complaint claimed BNSF assumed
insurer duties by "buying back" several policies and, along with
Zurich, breached contractual obligations by not covering the
claims. The plaintiffs dismissed the case in the US District Court
for the District of Montana before the defendants responded or
attorneys appeared for them.




                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Rousel Elaine T.
Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L.
Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2024. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***