/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCRAP_Public/210823.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                     A S I A   P A C I F I C

          Monday, August 23, 2021, Vol. 24, No. 162

                           Headlines



A U S T R A L I A

BOART LONGYEAR: Chapter 15 Case Summary
BOART LONGYEAR: Seeks US Recognition of Australian Restructuring
IC TRUST 2021-1: Moody's Assigns B2 Rating to Class C Notes
LIBERTY PRIME 2021-2: Moody's Assigns (P)B2 Rating to Cl. F Notes
PEPPER RESIDENTIAL 30: S&P Assigns B(sf) Rating on Cl. F Notes

PREMIER PLUMBING: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for Aug. 31
SOCIETYONE PL 2021-1: Moody's Assigns (P)B2 Rating to Cl. F Notes


C H I N A

CHINA EVERGRANDE: Bosses Summoned, Warned Over Debts
CHINA HUARONG: Expects to Post USD16-Bil. Net Loss for 2020
IDEANOMICS INC: Incurs $10 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
MINISO GROUP: Posts CNY1.4-Bil. Net Loss For Year Ended June 30
PRIMELINE ENERGY: Receives Notice of Default, Acceleration



I N D I A

AAMEYA POLYMERS: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
ADVENTURE PARK: CRISIL Keeps B Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
AMMA CONSTRUCTION: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
ANAS MOTORS: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
ATC LOGISTICS: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating

B SATYANARAYANA: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
BANSAL BROTHERS: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
BRITISH BIOLOGICALS: CRISIL Keeps B+ Rating in Not Cooperating
GOKULAM INDUSTRIES: CRISIL Keeps B Ratings in Not Cooperating
GRAFFITI LAMINATES: CRISIL Keeps B+ Ratings in Not Cooperating

HAIKO LOGISTICS: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
HORIZON GLOBAL: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
HOTEL ASHOK: CRISIL Keeps B Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
IMMENSE INDUSTRIES: CRISIL Keeps D Ratings in Not Cooperating
JAGAN INDUSTRIES: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating

JET AIRWAYS: Workers Seek Stay on Jalan-Kalrock Resolution Plan
JITM TRUST: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
JOHN SAW: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
KALYAN GRAND: CRISIL Keeps B- Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
M R REAL: Ind-Ra Affirms BB' LT Issuer Rating, Outlook Stable

M.S. LUVISH: Ind-Ra Affirms 'BB' LT Issuer Rating, Outlook Stable
METAMORPHOSIS ENGITECH: Ind-Ra Assigns BB- Rating, Outlook Stable
MSR SEA: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
RMJ MODERN: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
RNV INDUSTRIES: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating

S M ENTERPRISES: CRISIL Lowers Rating on INR17cr Loan to D
SAFAL FLEXIBOND: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
SAGAR MILK: CRISIL Lowers Rating on INR9cr LT Loan to B
SATYAM EXIMTEX: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
SEHGAL AUTORIDERS: CRISIL Lowers Rating on INR28.5cr Loan to B

SHANTI COLD: CRISIL Keeps B- Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
SHASHI DETECTIVE: CRISIL Lowers Rating on INR2cr New Loan to B
SHIVANI LOCKS: CRISIL Moves B+ Debt Ratings to Not Cooperating
ST PIPES: Ind-Ra Keeps 'BB-' LT Issuer Rating in Non-Cooperating


S I N G A P O R E

BRIGHTOIL 319: Commences Wind-Up Proceedings
DEXTRA PARTNERS: Court to Hear Wind-Up Petition on Aug. 27
DIGITAL ALPHA: FTI Appointed as Interim Judicial Managers
PARASTRUCT INNOVATIONS: Court Enters Wind-Up Order


S O U T H   K O R E A

DOOSAN HEAVY: Hyundai Heavy Completes Takeover of Doosan Infracore

                           - - - - -


=================
A U S T R A L I A
=================

BOART LONGYEAR: Chapter 15 Case Summary
---------------------------------------
Five affiliated debtors that concurrently filed voluntary petitions
under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code:

    Debtor                                        Case No.
    ------                                        --------
    Boart Longyear Limited                        21-11465
    26 Butler Blvd., Burbridge Business Park
    Adelaide Airport, SA 5950
    Australia

    Boart Longyear Australia Pty Limited          21-11466
    Boart Longyear Investments Pty Limited        21-11467
    Boart Longyear Management Pty Limited         21-11468
    Votraint No. 1609 Pty Limited                 21-11469

Business Description: Established in 1890, Boart Longyear is a
                      provider of drilling services, drilling
                      equipment and performance tooling for mining
                      and drilling companies.  It also has a
                      substantial presence in aftermarket parts
                      and service, energy, mine dewatering, oil
                      sands exploration, production drilling, and
                      down-hole exploration.

Foreign Proceeding: Boart Longyear Limited et al. (Supreme Court
                    of New South Wales)

Chapter 15 Petition Date: August 17, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of New York

Judge: Hon. Lisa G. Beckerman

Foreign Representative: Nora R. Pincus
                        2455 South 3600 West
                        West Valley City, UT 84119
                        United States of America

Foreign
Representative's
Counsel:          Dennis F. Dunne, Esq.
                  MILBANK LLP
                  55 Hudson Yards
                  New York, NY 10001
                  Tel: 212-530-5000
                  Fax: 212-530-5219
                  Email: ddunne@milbank.com

                     - and -

                  Thomas R. Kreller, Esq.  
                  MILBANK LLP
                  2029 Century Park East 33rd Floor
                  Los Angeles, California 90067
                  Tel: (424) 386-4000
                  Fax: (213) 629-5063
                  Email: tkreller@milbank.com

Estimated Assets: Unknown

Estimated Debt: Unknown

A full-text copy of Boart Longyear Limited's Chapter 15 petition is
available for free at PacerMonitor.com at:

                           https://bit.ly/387lPah


BOART LONGYEAR: Seeks US Recognition of Australian Restructuring
----------------------------------------------------------------
Boart Longyear Limited and four of its affiliates filed Chapter 15
bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 21-11466) on
Aug. 17, 2021, to seek U.S. recognition of its restructuring
proceedings in Australia.

Boart Longyear is among the world's leading providers of drilling
services, drilling equipment, and performance tooling for mining
and drilling companies. Boart Longyear also has a significant
presence in aftermarket parts and services, energy, mine
de-watering, oil sands exploration, and production drilling.  Boart
Longyear was founded in 1890.  Its predecessor, Longyear Company,
grew to become an important player in many well-known projects,
including determining the strength of the rock foundation for the
Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco.

Boart International, founded in 1936 as a subsidiary of De Beers,
the global diamond mining concern, engaged in developing industrial
applications for diamonds. Boart International became well known
for its innovations in diamond drilling, such as patenting the
world's first wireline core retrieval system, which both increased
global production and made extraction safer and more reliable.

Longyear Company was acquired by Boart International in 1974 and
formally merged into Boart Longyear in 1994.  In 2006, Australia's
Macquarie Bank purchased Boart Longyear and took it public the
following year. Its initial public offering in 2007 was the
second-largest in Australian history at approximately AU$2.3
billion.

Boart Longyear employs approximately 5,168 people and generated
$657 million in revenue in 2020. It conducts operations across
North America, Latin America, Australasia and South East Asia, the
Middle East, and Africa.  Nearly all of Boart Longyear's revenue
derives from the following two business units: (a) drilling
services within the mining and minerals industry ("Global Drilling
Services") and (b) the manufacture, distribution, and sale of
equipment for the mining and mineral industry ("Global Products").

               Prepetition Capital Structure

As of December 31, 2020, Boart Longyear's unaudited balance sheets
reflected total assets of approximately $609 million and total
liabilities of approximately $1 billion.

The Debtors' secured indebtedness consists of (a) $348,492,360
outstanding under 12.00%/10.00% senior secured PIK toggle notes due
2022; (b) $160,336,984.87 owing under a Term Loan A Securities
Agreement dated as of December 31, 2018; (c) $193,285,306.60 owing
under a Term Loan B Securities Agreement dated as of December 31,
2018; (d)e$6 million (principal amount) was owing under an Amended
and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of
July 23, 2017 (the Existing ABL); (e) approximately $62.4 million
(principal amount) in principal amount was outstanding under a Term
Loan Securities Agreement dated as of July 23, 2017 (the Backstop
ABL); and (f) $50.3 million in principal amount outstanding under a
Term Loan Securities Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2021 (the
Incremental Financing).

As of the Petition Date, $93,944,523 was outstanding under an
indenture, dated as of March 28, 2011 providing for Unsecured
Notes.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate that they have
approximately $59 million of unsecured trade debt outstanding,
including accounts payable to vendors that provide key components
for the construction of Boart Longyear's drilling capital equipment
and specialized steel tubing critical to the construction of drill
rods.

As of May 12, 2021, 88,511,800 shares of BLY's common stock were
outstanding.  BLY's common stock trades on the Australian
Securities Exchange under the ticker symbol "BLY." There were also
2,012,403 quoted warrants, 43,158 options, and 427,816 unquoted
warrants outstanding.

                  Australian Restructuring

Although Boart Longyear's operations, on the whole, remain strong,
a combination of adverse macroeconomic conditions that affected the
commodities market for much of the past few years, and a balance
sheet weighed down by the debt incurred to make investments in
equipment and other working assets when market conditions were more
favorable have compelled the Debtors to seek: (a) the Australian
Court's approval of the two Schemes under the Corporations Act, one
to restructure the majority of their secured debt (the "Secured
Creditor Scheme"), and the other to restructure the majority of
their unsecured debt (the "Unsecured Creditor Scheme"); and (b)
relief from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court under chapter 15 of the
Bankruptcy Code to prevent dissenting creditors from frustrating
the purposes of Boart Longyear's restructuring, the foremost of
which is to maximize value for all creditors.

On January 7, 2021, Boart Longyear announced the engagement of
Rothschild & Co. to advise it in connection with evaluation of its
options in connection with the upcoming maturities of its debt
facilities in the second half of 2022.  After months of
negotiations between Boart Longyear and its major stakeholders, on
May 13, 2021, Boart Longyear announced that it reached an
agreement, memorialized in a restructuring support agreement (the
"RSA").

The completion of the transactions contemplated by the RSA will
substantially reduce Boart Longyear's debt, strengthen its balance
sheet, lower interest expenses, and provide enhanced liquidity to
support operations and future growth.  The RSA was supported by the
overwhelming majority of Boart Longyear's lenders, such initial
"Supporting Creditors" including certain funds and accounts managed
or advised by Centerbridge, represented by Kirkland & Ellis LLP,
and an ad hoc group of creditors represented by Paul, Weiss,
Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP (the "AHG").  

More specifically, Boart Longyear's total debt would decrease to
less than $200 million, with approximately $795 million,
approximately 85%, being converted to equity interests in
reorganized BLY.  BLY's existing shareholders will be given an
opportunity to purchase additional equity in reorganized BLY
alongside BLY's creditors. Among other things, the parties to the
RSA have agreed to distribute the New Common Equity based upon the
following stipulated amounts and allocations:

    * For claims arising out of Term Loan A (the "Term Loan A
Claims"): pro rata shares of New Common Equity, calculated based on
(i) 100% of the secured portion of the Term Loan A Claims of
$85,000,000 (the "TLA Secured Equity Entitlement") and (ii) 25% of
the unsecured portion of the Term Loan A Claims of $75,336,984.87
(the "TLA Unsecured Equity Entitlement");

    * For claims arising out of Term Loan B (the "Term Loan B
Claims"): pro rata shares of New Common Equity, calculated based on
(i) 100% of the secured portion of the Term Loan B Claims of
$105,000,000 (the "TLB Secured Equity Entitlement") and (ii) 25% of
the unsecured portion of the Term Loan B Claims of $88,285,306.60
(the "TLB Unsecured Equity Entitlement");  

    * For claims arising out of the Secured Notes (the "Secured
Notes Claims"): pro rata shares of New Common Equity, calculated
based on (i) 100% of the secured portion of the Secured Notes
Claims of $303,567,773.87 (the "SSN Secured Equity Entitlement")
and (ii) 25% of the unsecured portion of the Secured Notes Claims
of $44,924,586.44 (the "SSN Unsecured Equity Entitlement"); and

    * For claims arising out of the Unsecured Notes ("Unsecured
Notes Claims"): pro rata shares of New Common Equity, calculated
based on 22.5% of the Unsecured Notes Claims of $93,944,522.71 (the
"SUN Equity Entitlement").

On July 22, 2021, the Debtors filed an application (the
"Application") in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Sydney,
Australia, being an Australian court of competent jurisdiction for
purposes of Part 5.1 of the Corporations Act, seeking orders: (a)
convening meetings to consider the two schemes of arrangement
proposed by the Debtors to be made with certain of their secured
(the "Secured Creditors' Scheme") and unsecured creditors (the
"Unsecured Creditors' Scheme"); and (b) approving the Schemes.

The first hearing took place before the Australian Court (before
the Honourable Justice Black), on July 27 and 29, 2021.  The second
hearing of the proceeding will be held on September 16, 2021 at
9:15 a.m. (Australian Eastern Standard Time).

The Schemes reflect the agreements memorialized in the RSA.

When the restructuring is consummated, it is anticipated that the
Debtors' amended debt profile and the injection of additional
capital will reduce their financial burden and enable them to
operate profitably.


IC TRUST 2021-1: Moody's Assigns B2 Rating to Class C Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned the following definitive
ratings to the notes issued by Perpetual Corporate Trust Limited as
trustee of IC Trust 2021-1.

Issuer: IC Trust 2021-1

AUD20.3 million Class A Notes, Assigned Baa1 (sf)

AUD1.0 million Class B Notes, Assigned Ba2 (sf)

AUDA2.1 million Class C Notes, Assigned B2 (sf)

AUD2.25 million Class D Notes are not rated by Moody's

IC Trust 2021-1 is a cash securitisation of non-conforming auto
loans extended to consumer borrowers in Australia. The loans were
originated and are serviced by Fin One Pty Ltd (Fin One, unrated).
This is Fin One's first ABS transaction.

Fin One, a privately owned non-bank lender, was established in 2010
with a focus of providing auto loans to non-conforming consumer
borrowers in the Australian market. In 2016, the lender expanded
into financing of commercial auto loans. As of June 2021, Fin One's
loan portfolio amounted to around AUD238.7 million.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The definitive ratings take into account, among other factors, an
evaluation of the underlying receivables and their expected
performance, evaluation of the capital structure and credit
enhancement provided to the notes, availability of excess spread
over the life of the transaction, the liquidity reserve in the
amount of 2.50% of the stated balance of the notes, the legal
structure, and the experience of Fin One as servicer and the
availability of a back-up servicer.

According to Moody's, the transaction benefits from credit
strengths such as the high level of excess spread that is available
to cover losses from defaulted receivables, the availability of a
yield reserve and the relatively high seasoning of the underlying
portfolio. At the same time, Moody's notes that the transaction
features some credit weaknesses such as high proportion of
borrowers with a history of credit impairment and
lower-than-average historically observed recovery rates.

In addition, Moody's notes that Fin One is a specialist servicer of
non-conforming auto loans. In an event of servicer transfer, there
is a risk of higher level of defaults in the portfolio, if the
substitute servicer does not have the same specialised approach to
servicing as Fin One.

Notable transactional features are as follows:

Once step-down conditions are satisfied, all notes, excluding the
class D notes, will receive their pro-rata share of principal. Step
down conditions include, among others, that the subordination to
the Class A notes is at least 1.5 times the initial level of
subordination, and that there are no unreimbursed charge-offs.

A yield reserve will be available to cover interest payment
shortfalls on the required payments and any losses not covered by
the excess spread. The reserve is not funded at closing and will
build up from excess spread up to an amount of 2% of the initial
invested amount of the notes, that is AUD513,000. If the notes are
not redeemed on the call date, all excess available income will be
trapped in the yield reserve.

Perpetual Corporate Trust Limited is the back-up servicer. If Fin
One is terminated as servicer, Perpetual will take over the
servicing role in accordance with the standby servicing deed and
its back-up servicing plan.

Key model and portfolio assumptions:

Moody's portfolio credit enhancement ("PCE") — representing the
loss that Moody's expects the portfolio to suffer in the event of a
severe recession scenario — is 48%. Moody's mean expected default
rate for this transaction is 12.8% and the assumed recovery rate is
10%. Expected defaults, recoveries and PCE are parameters used by
Moody's to calibrate its lognormal portfolio loss distribution
curve and to associate a probability with each potential future
loss scenario in Moody's cash flow model to rate consumer ABS.

The assumed default rate and PCE are higher than for other
Australian auto ABS, reflecting the non-conforming nature of the
securitised portfolio. The lower-than-average assumed recovery rate
reflects Fin One's historical experience.

Key pool features are as follows:

The weighted average seasoning of the portfolio is 26.9 months,
while the weighted average remaining term is 36.8 months;

Around 41.6% of loans have prior defaults or judgements, or both;

Interest rates in the portfolio range from 12% to 26%, with a
weighted average interest rate of 22.3%;

Around 92.7% of the loans are secured by used vehicles.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Auto Loan- and Lease-Backed ABS" published in
December 2020.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

Up

Levels of credit protection that are greater than necessary to
protect investors against current expectations of loss could lead
to an upgrade of the ratings. Moody's current expectations of loss
could be better than its original expectations because of fewer
defaults by underlying obligors. The Australian job market is a
primary driver of performance.

Down

Levels of credit protection that are insufficient to protect
investors against current expectations of loss could lead to a
downgrade of the ratings. Moody's current expectations of loss
could be worse than its original expectations because of more
defaults by underlying obligors. The Australian job market is a
primary driver of performance. Other reasons for worse performance
than Moody's expects include poor servicing, error on the part of
transaction parties, a deterioration in credit quality of
transaction counterparties, lack of transactional governance and
fraud.


LIBERTY PRIME 2021-2: Moody's Assigns (P)B2 Rating to Cl. F Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned the following provisional
ratings to the notes to be issued by Liberty Funding Pty Limited in
respect of Liberty Prime Series 2021-2.

Issuer: Liberty Prime Series 2021-2

AUD880.0 million Class A1 Notes, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

AUD29.0 million Class A2 Notes, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

AUD29.0 million Class AB Notes, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

AUD25.0 million Class B Notes, Assigned (P)Aa1 (sf)

AUD11.0 million Class C Notes, Assigned (P)A1 (sf)

AUD11.0 million Class D Notes, Assigned (P)Baa1 (sf)

AUD11.0 million Class E Notes, Assigned (P)Baa3 (sf)

AUD3.0 million Class F Notes, Assigned (P)B2 (sf)

The AUD1.0 million Class G Notes are not rated by Moody's.

The transaction is a securitisation of Australian residential
mortgages loans originated and are serviced by Liberty Financial
Pty Limited (Liberty, unrated). The transaction includes a three
month pre-funding period, whereby Liberty Funding Pty Ltd will
issue notes up to AUD1.0 billion, based on the initial pool of
AUD700.0 million. During the pre-funding period, additional loans
may be sold into the trust, up to the pre-funding amount of
AUD300.0 million, subject to certain portfolio parameters and the
eligibility criteria.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The provisional ratings take into account, among other factors:

- Evaluation of the underlying receivables and their expected
performance;

- Evaluation of the capital structure and credit enhancement
provided to the notes;

- The availability of excess spread over the life of the
transaction;

- The liquidity facility in the amount of 1.0% of the notes
balance subject to a floor of AUD1,350,000;

- The prefunding period and the legal structure; and

- The experience of Liberty as the servicer.

According to Moody's, the transaction benefits from various credit
strengths such as relatively high subordination to the senior
notes, high seasoning of the underlying portfolio, and a guarantee
fee reserve account. However, Moody's notes that the transaction
features some credit weaknesses such as the substantial portion of
the portfolio extended to self-employed borrowers and the pro-rata
amortization of rated notes under certain conditions.

Moody's MILAN credit enhancement (MILAN CE) for the collateral pool
-- representing the loss that Moody's expects the portfolio to
suffer in the event of a severe recession scenario -- is 6.1%.
Moody's expected loss for this transaction is 0.70%. The MILAN CE
and expected loss is lower than for previous Liberty Prime
transactions, reflecting an improvement in the composition of the
securitized pool. These assumptions also reflect Moody's assessment
of the strong historical performance of Liberty's portfolio in
terms of delinquencies and defaults evidenced, and benchmarking
with comparable RMBS transactions in the Australian market.

The key transactional features are as follows:

Class A1 and Class A2 notes benefit from 12.0% and 9.1% note
subordination respectively.

Principal collections will be at first distributed sequentially.
Starting from the second anniversary from closing, all notes
(excluding the Class G notes) may participate in proportional
principal collections distribution subject to the step down
conditions being met. The step down criteria include, among others,
no charge offs on any of the notes and Class A1 note subordination
of at least 19.0%. The Class G notes' share of principal will be
allocated in reverse sequential order starting from the Class F
notes. Principal pay-down will revert to sequential once the
aggregate loan amount is at 20.0% or less of the aggregate loan
amount at closing, or on or following the payment date in August
2026.

The guarantee fee reserve account, which is unfunded at closing
and will build up to a limit of AUD3,000,000 from excess spread if
the guarantee fee reserve test is satisfied. The reserve account
will firstly be available to meet losses on the loans and charge
offs against the notes. Secondly, it can be used to cover any
required payment shortfalls that remain after liquidity facility
and principal draws.

The key features of the mortgage loan pool are as follows:

- The portfolio has a weighted average scheduled loan-to-value
(LTV) ratio of 67.1%, with 7.7%of the loans with a scheduled LTV
above 80.0% and 3.3% of the loans with a scheduled LTV above 90%.

- Around 24.0% of the mortgage loans in the portfolio were granted
to self-employed borrowers.

- All loans in the portfolio were extended on a verified income
documentation basis.

- The portfolio contains no exposure to borrowers with prior
credit impairment (default, judgment or bankruptcy).

- The portfolio has a weighted-average seasoning of 26.3 months,
with 47.1% of loans originated in the last six months.

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's
Approach to Rating RMBS Using the MILAN Framework" published in
December 2020.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

Factors that could lead to an upgrade of the notes include a rapid
build-up of credit enhancement, due to sequential amortization, or
better-than-expected collateral performance. The Australian jobs
market and the housing market are primary drivers of performance.

A factor that could lead to a downgrade of the notes is
worse-than-expected collateral performance. Other reasons for worse
performance than Moody's expects include poor servicing, error on
the part of transaction parties, deterioration in credit quality of
transaction counterparties, fraud and lack of transactional
governance.


PEPPER RESIDENTIAL 30: S&P Assigns B(sf) Rating on Cl. F Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned ratings to seven classes of
nonconforming and prime residential mortgage-backed securities
(RMBS) issued by Permanent Custodians Ltd. as trustee of Pepper
Residential Securities Trust No.30. Pepper Residential Securities
Trust No.30 is a securitization of nonconforming and prime
residential mortgages originated by Pepper Homeloans Pty Ltd.

The ratings reflect:

-- S&P's view of the credit risk of the underlying collateral
portfolio, including its view that the credit support is sufficient
to withstand the stresses it applies. The credit support for the
rated notes comprises note subordination and excess spread. The
assessment of credit risk takes into account the underwriting
standard and centralized approval process of the seller, Pepper
Homeloans.

-- The availability of a retention amount and amortization amount,
which will all be funded by excess spread, but at various stages of
the transaction's term. They will have separate functions and
timeframes, including reducing the balance of senior notes,
reducing the balance of the most subordinated notes.

-- S&P's expectation that the various mechanisms to support
liquidity within the transaction, including a liquidity facility
equal to 2.5% of the outstanding balance of the notes, principal
draws, and a yield-enhancement reserve--to the extent it is
funded--are sufficient under our stress assumptions to ensure
timely payment of interest.

-- The condition that a minimum margin will be maintained on the
assets.

-- That S&P also has factored into its ratings the legal structure
of the trust, which has been established as a special-purpose
entity and meets its criteria for insolvency remoteness.

-- S&P's outlook assumptions for Australian RMBS, which it updated
in 2020 in response to changing macroeconomic conditions as a
result of the COVID-19 outbreak. As of Aug. 13, 2021, there were
five loans with COVID-19-related hardship arrangements present
within the pool.

  Ratings Assigned

  Pepper Residential Securities Trust No.30

  Class A1, A$637.50 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A2, A$106.30 million: AAA (sf)
  Class B, A$47.50 million: AA (sf)
  Class C, A$21.00 million: A (sf)
  Class D, A$15.30 million: BBB (sf)
  Class E, A$9.20 million: BB (sf)
  Class F, A$6.80 million: B (sf)
  Class G, A$6.40 million: Not rated


PREMIER PLUMBING: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for Aug. 31
-----------------------------------------------------------
A second meeting of creditors in the proceedings of Premier
Plumbing Australia Pty Ltd has been set for Aug. 31, 2021, at 10:00
a.m. via conference telephone call.

The purpose of the meeting is (1) to receive the report by the
Administrator about the business, property, affairs and financial
circumstances of the Company; and (2) for the creditors of the
Company to resolve whether the Company will execute a deed of
company arrangement, the administration should end, or the Company
be wound up.

Creditors wishing to attend are advised proofs and proxies should
be submitted to the Administrator by Aug. 30, 2021, at 4:00 p.m.

Bill Karageozis and Jonathan McLeod of McLeod & Partners were
appointed as administrators of Premier Plumbing on July 27, 2021.


SOCIETYONE PL 2021-1: Moody's Assigns (P)B2 Rating to Cl. F Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned provisional ratings to the
notes to be issued by Perpetual Corporate Trust Limited as trustee
of SocietyOne PL 2021-1 Trust.

Issuer: SocietyOne PL 2021-1 Trust

AUD130 million Class A Notes, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

AUD19.4 million Class B Notes, Assigned (P)Aa2 (sf)

AUD12 million Class C Notes, Assigned (P)A2 (sf)

AUD11 million Class D Notes, Assigned (P)Baa2 (sf)

AUD9.2 million Class E Notes, Assigned (P)Ba2 (sf)

AUD9.2 million Class F Notes, Assigned (P)B2 (sf)

The AUD9.2 million of Class G-1 and Class G-2 Notes (together, the
Class G Notes) are not rated by Moody's.

The transaction is a cash securitisation of a portfolio of
Australian unsecured consumer personal loans originated by
SocietyOne Australia Pty Ltd (SocietyOne, unrated). This is
SocietyOne's inaugural term asset-backed securitisation
transaction.

SocietyOne is an Australian non-bank lender providing consumer
loans, including unsecured personal loans and secured loans, to
prime borrowers in Australia. As of June 2021, its loan portfolio
amounted to around AUD357.4 million, consisting of over 23,000
receivables.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The provisional ratings take into account, among other factors, (1)
Moody's evaluation of the underlying receivables and their expected
performance, (2) evaluation of the capital structure and credit
enhancement provided to the notes, (3) availability of excess
spread over the transaction's life, (4) the liquidity facility in
the amount of 3.0% of the rated notes balance, subject to a floor
of AUD600,000, (5) the legal structure, and (6) SocietyOne's
experience as servicer.

Key transactional features are as follows:

The notes will be repaid on a sequential basis initially. Once
step-down conditions are satisfied, all notes, excluding Class G
Notes, will receive their pro-rata share of principal. Step-down
conditions include, among others, 45% subordination to the Class A
Notes and no unreimbursed charge-offs. The repayment of principal
will revert to sequential on the call option date.

A swap provided by National Australia Bank Limited
(Aa3/P-1/Aa2(cr)/P-1(cr)) will hedge the interest rate mismatch
between the assets bearing a fixed rate of interest, and floating
rate liabilities. The notional balance of the swap will follow a
schedule based on amortisation of the assets assuming a certain
prepayment rate.

Perpetual Corporate Trust Limited (NR) is the back-up servicer. If
SocietyOne is terminated as servicer, Perpetual will take over the
servicing role in accordance with the standby servicing deed and
its back-up servicing plan.

According to Moody's, the transaction benefits from credit
strengths such as the high level of excess spread that is available
to cover losses from defaulted receivables, granularity of the
portfolio and the largely fully-employed status of the obligors,
providing greater income stability. At the same time, Moody's notes
that the transaction features some credit weaknesses such as
limited historical data and low seasoning of the underlying
portfolio.

Key model and portfolio assumptions:

Moody's portfolio credit enhancement ("PCE") — representing the
loss that Moody's expects the portfolio to suffer in the event of a
severe recession scenario — is 40%. Moody's mean expected default
rate for this transaction is 9% and the assumed recovery rate is
5%. Expected defaults, recoveries and PCE are parameters used by
Moody's to calibrate its lognormal portfolio loss distribution
curve and to associate a probability with each potential future
loss scenario in Moody's cash flow model to rate consumer ABS.

Moody's analysis is based on limited historical performance data.
SocietyOne is a relatively new originator, with relevant historical
default data only available from the third quarter of 2016. As
such, the pool's performance could be subject to greater
variability than the currently available loss data indicates.
Moody's has incorporated an additional stress into its default
assumptions to account for the limited data, including the fact
that the performance history does not cover a full life cycle for
any one vintage. As such, the assumed default rate and PCE are
higher than for Australian consumer ABS, where the available
historical data cover a fuller economic cycle.

Key pool features are as follows:

As of the June 30, 2021 cut-off date, the securitised pool
consisted of 8,688 personal loans. The total outstanding balance of
the receivables was AUD162,961,335.

The weighted average interest rate of the portfolio is 12.7%.

84.0% of loans are to borrowers in full-time employment.

The weighted average Equifax credit score of the portfolio is
723.

The weighted average remaining term of the portfolio is 46.9
months. The weighted average seasoning of the initial portfolio is
6.3 months.

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's
Approach to Rating Consumer Loan-Backed ABS" published in July
2020.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

Factors that could lead to an upgrade of the notes include a rapid
build-up of credit enhancement due to sequential amortization or a
better-than-expected collateral performance. The Australian job
market is a primary driver of performance.

Factor that could lead to a downgrade of the notes is a
worse-than-expected collateral performance, poor servicing, error
on the part of transaction parties, a deterioration in the credit
quality of transaction counterparties, a lack of transactional
governance, or fraud.




=========
C H I N A
=========

CHINA EVERGRANDE: Bosses Summoned, Warned Over Debts
----------------------------------------------------
ShanghaiDaily.com reports that China's central bank said it
summoned executives of the country's most indebted property
developer, China Evergrande Group, on Aug. 18 and issued a rare
warning that the company ought to reduce its debt risks and
prioritize stability.

ShanghaiDaily.com says Evergrande has been scrambling for cash as
it seeks to meet new debt-ratio caps. The scale of its debts has
authorities and investors concerned that a collapse or default
could trigger a far broader financial crisis.

Evergrande must "actively defuse debt risk and maintain real estate
and financial markets stability," the People's Bank of China and
China's banking regulator, the China Banking and Insurance
Regulatory Commission, said in a joint statement on Aug. 19,
ShanghaiDaily.com relays.

"Evergrande, as a top real estate company, must earnestly implement
strategic arrangements made by the central government to ensure the
stable and healthy development of the real estate market, and
strive to keep operations stable," they said.

They urged Evergrande to disclose information on major events by
the rules and clarify market rumors on time, ShanghaiDaily.com
notes.

ShanghaiDaily.com says Evergrande had no immediate response,
although it has been struggling to raise funds through asset sales,
including offloading part of its electric vehicle business.

Evergrande has more than CNY240 billion (US$37 billion) of bills
and trade payables from contractors to settle over the next 12
months, the report discloses.

                        About China Evergrande

China Evergrande Group is an integrated residential property
developer. The Company, through its subsidiaries, operates in
property development, investment, management, finance, internet,
health, culture, and tourism markets.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter-Asia Pacific, S&P
Global Ratings, on Aug. 5, 2021, downgraded China Evergrande Group
and its subsidiaries Hengda Real Estate Group Co. Ltd. and Tianji
Holding Ltd. to 'CCC' from 'B-'. S&P also lowered its long-term
issue rating on the U.S. dollar notes issued by Evergrande and
guaranteed by Tianji to 'CCC-' from 'CCC+'.

The negative outlook reflects Evergrande's increasing strained
liquidity and nonpayment risk. It also reflects S&P's view that its
asset disposal plan, though potentially substantial, lacks
visibility or certainty.


CHINA HUARONG: Expects to Post USD16-Bil. Net Loss for 2020
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Wall Street Journal reports that China Huarong Asset Management
Co., China's top manager of distressed assets, said it would post a
massive loss and expects to receive a capital infusion from
state-owned financial institutions, avoiding a messy default that
would have had wide repercussions for Asia's credit markets.

The Journal relates that China Huarong Asset Management Co., which
is majority owned by China's Ministry of Finance and the largest of
the country's managers of nonperforming loans and other bad debt,
also said it has no plans to restructure its debt, cementing
beliefs among investors that many Chinese institutions are too big
to fail.

On Aug. 18, the company said it expects to post a net loss
equivalent to about $16 billion for 2020, the Journal discloses.
Earlier this year, the firm's delay in releasing its results
spooked international investors and caused its bond prices to
tumble.

According to the Journal, the Beijing-based company blamed its past
overexpansion and other problems on former Chairman Lai Xiaomin,
who was executed after a court found him guilty of bribery and
embezzlement. It also said the coronavirus pandemic and its
negative impact on markets caused a swift deterioration in some of
its assets.

The Journal adds that Huarong said that five state-owned financial
companies, including Citic Group, fellow bad-debt manager China
Cinda Asset Management and an investment unit of China Life
Insurance Co., have signed an agreement to purchase newly issued
shares, though it didn't detail how much capital they planned to
contribute.

                        About China Huarong

China Huarong Asset Management Co Ltd is a China-based company
mainly engaged in asset management business. The Company operates
through three segments. The Distressed Asset Management Operations
segment is engaged in distressed asset management, debt equity swap
asset management, the management of non-performing assets carried
out by subsidiaries distressed asset management business conducted
by its subsidiaries, distressed asset-based special situations
investments business and distressed asset-based property
development business. The Financial Services segment mainly
includes securities and futures business, financial leasing
business, banking services business and consumer finance business.
The Asset Management and Investment Operations segment is mainly
engaged in trust business, private equity funds business, financial
investments business, international business, and other
businesses.


IDEANOMICS INC: Incurs $10 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ideanomics, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss of $9.99
million on $33.22 million of total revenue for the three months
ended June 30, 2021, compared to a net loss of $26.42 million on
$4.69 million of total revenue for the three months ended June 30,
2020.

For the six months ended June 30, 2021, the Company reported a net
loss of $10.73 million on $65.93 million of total revenue compared
to a net loss of $39.04 million on $5.07 million of total revenue
for the same period during the prior year.

As of June 30, 2021, the Company had $698.05 million in total
assets, $145.39 million in total liabilities, $1.26 million in
convertible redeemable preferred stock, $7.72 million in redeemable
non-controlling interest, and $543.68 million in total equity.

As of June 30, 2021, the Company had cash of $395.6 million.
Approximately $39.3 million was held in accounts outside of the
United States, primarily in Hong Kong and the PRC.

Cash used in operating activities was $(10.4) million for the six
months ended June 30, 2021 as compared to cash used in operating
activities of $(10.4) million in the same period in 2020.  This was
primarily due to: (1) a reduction in net loss to $(10.7) million in
the current period as compared to a net loss of $(39.0) million in
the same period of 2020, (2) total non-cash adjustments increase
(decrease) to net loss was $(2.8) million and $28.5 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively; and (3)
total changes in operating assets and liabilities resulted in an
increase of $3.2 million and of $0.2 million in cash used in
operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and
2020, respectively.

Cash used in investing activities was $(142.8) million, primarily
due to expenditures incurred for the acquisitions of Timios, WAVE,
Solectrac and US Hybrid, the investments in Energica and FNL and
the acquisition of the convertible note with Silk EV.

The Company received $383.0 million from financing activities in
the current quarter versus $45.7 million in the same period in the
prior year.  The issuance of convertible notes generated $220.0
million in the current period as compared to $2.0 million in the
same period of 2020.  The exercise of warrants and issuance of
common stock generated $163.0 million as compared to $39.1 million
in the same period of 2020.  In the period ended June 30, 2020 the
Company received $7.1 million from a non-controlling shareholders
contribution and made a repayment of $3.0 million to a related
party.

The Company expects to continue to raise both equity and debt
finance to support the Company's investment plans and operations.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                        https://bit.ly/2XSnUFv

                         About Ideanomics

Ideanomics is a global company focused on the convergence of
financial services and industries experiencing technological
disruption.  Its Mobile Energy Global (MEG) division is a service
provider which facilitates the adoption of electric vehicles by
commercial fleet operators through offering vehicle procurement,
finance and leasing, and energy management solutions under its
innovative sales to financing to charging (S2F2C) business model.
Ideanomics Capital is focused on disruptive fintech solutions and
services across the financial services industry.  Together, MEG and
Ideanomics Capital provide their global customers and partners with
leading technologies and services designed to improve transparency,
efficiency, and accountability, and its shareholders with the
opportunity to participate in high-potential, growth industries.
The Company is headquartered in New York, NY, with operations in
the U.S., China, Ukraine, and Malaysia.

Ideanomics reported a net loss of $106.04 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $96.83 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of March 31, 2021, the Company
had $569.90 million in total assets, $140.37 million in total
liabilities, $1.26 million in convertible preferred stock, $7.6
million in redeemable non-controlling interest, and $420.67 million
in total equity.


MINISO GROUP: Posts CNY1.4-Bil. Net Loss For Year Ended June 30
---------------------------------------------------------------
Nikkei Asia reports that MINISO Group Holding Limited amassed a net
loss exceeding CNY1.4 billion (US$215 million) for the year ended
in June as the coronavirus pandemic deepened the company's red
ink.

Miniso struggled as normally profitable overseas outlets were
forced to close temporarily amid lockdowns. But performance picked
up in the April-June quarter, led by operations abroad.

Full-year group sales inched up 1% to CNY9 billion yuan, the
company said Aug. 19, Nikkei discloses. Chinese revenue rose 21% to
CNY7.2 billion, but other regions declined 39% to CNY1.7 billion.
Miniso widened its net loss from the fiscal year ended June 2020,
when it finished CNY200 million in the red.

However, sales in the recent April-June period soared 59% on the
year to CNY2.4 billion. Chinese sales grew 43% while sales in other
markets mushroomed by 180%. Net profit in the fiscal fourth quarter
reached CNY100 million, rebounding from a loss of CNY40 million in
the year-ago period, Nikkei relays.

Miniso operated 4,749 stores at the end of June, up more than 10%
from a year earlier. The chain added 406 shops in China for a total
of 2,939 domestic outlets, while opening 121 more locations abroad
for a total of 1,810.

The retailer did business in 98 nations and territories outside of
China as of June 30. The company expects to reach its 100th market
by the end of the year, Vincent Huang, Miniso's vice president of
international business, told Nikkei.

Huang said Miniso's relative early entry in Asia and Latin America
will help in further developing those markets, with plans to
swiftly open additional locations in the Mideast and Europe.

The group is focusing resources on Top Toy, its chain of figurine
hobby shops. Since opening the first location in Guangzhou in
December, the operation now spans 33 locations across China.

Based in Guangzhou, China, MINISO Group Holding Limited (NYSE:
MNSO) -- http://www.miniso.com/-- an investment holding company,
engages in the retail and wholesale of lifestyle products in China,
Asia, the Americas, and Europe. The company offers products in
various categories, including home decor products, small
electronics, textiles, accessories, beauty tools, toys, cosmetics,
personal care products, snacks, fragrances and perfumes, and
stationeries and gifts under the MINISO and WonderLife brand names.
As of June 30, 2020, it operated a network of approximately 4,200
MINISO stores, as well as online sales channels.


PRIMELINE ENERGY: Receives Notice of Default, Acceleration
----------------------------------------------------------
Primeline Energy Holdings Inc. on Aug. 11, 2021, disclosed that it
has received notice of the occurrence of an event of default under
the loan facility from the syndicate of banks (the "Syndicate")
which provided finance for Primeline's share of the development
cost of the LS 36-1 gas field, and of acceleration and demand for
repayment of the principal amount of the loan of US
$152,761,912.70, together with interest and penalties. As
previously disclosed, production at LS 36-1 has been shut down, and
Primeline has no source of revenue with which to repay the loan.
The Syndicate has yet to provide notification to Primeline with
regard to enforcement of security for the loan.

Primeline confirms that, other than as disclosed in prior press
releases, there have been no material business developments since
its press release of August 21, 2020 and the filing on February 13,
2020 of the Company's latest interim financial report for the
period ended December 31, 2019.

Primeline is an independent, China-focused oil and gas exploration
and production company with shares listed on the TSX Venture
Exchange under the symbol "PEH".




=========
I N D I A
=========

AAMEYA POLYMERS: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Aameya
Polymers LLP (APLLP) continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit             10       CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Term Loan                5       CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with APLLP for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of APLLP, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on APLLP
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
APLLP continues to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Set up in March 2016, APLLP manufactures multi-layer laminated
films, polythene bags and pouches, used for packaging purposes in
industries such as food & grain, pharmacy, confectionary, and FMCG.
Commercial operations commenced from April 2017. Mr. Vishal Poddar
and Mrs Rekha Shah are partners in the firm. The manufacturing
facility is situated at Dewas, Madhya Pradesh, with an installed
capacity of 3600 metric tons per annum.


ADVENTURE PARK: CRISIL Keeps B Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the rating on bank facilities of Adventure Park
(APK) continues to be 'CRISIL B/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Proposed Term Loan       5       CRISIL B/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with APK for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of APK, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on APK
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
APK continue to be 'CRISIL B/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Promoted by Mrs. Gayatri, APK is setting up an 'Adventure' themed
amusement park with adventure and water rides. The firm's amusement
park is being set up in a total area of 35 acres in Coimbatore and
is expected to commence operations from March 2018.


AMMA CONSTRUCTION: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Amma
Construction India Private Limited (ACIPL) continue to be 'CRISIL
B+/Stable/CRISIL A4 Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Bank Guarantee          6.5      CRISIL A4 (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Cash Credit             3.5      CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with ACIPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of ACIPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on ACIPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
ACIPL continues to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable/CRISIL A4 Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

Setup in 2010, Amma Construction India Pvt Ltd. (ACIPL) is engaged
in civil construction, primarily road and building projects. The
company undertakes projects for various government entities in the
states of Karnataka, Maharashtra and Tripura. The company is based
out of Bengaluru and is promoted by Mr. S Rama Krishna.


ANAS MOTORS: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Anas Motors
Private Limited (AMPL) continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Overdraft Facility     6.37      CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Proposed Long Term     0.13      CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
   Bank Loan Facility               Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with AMPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of AMPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on AMPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
AMPL continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

AMPL, incorporated in 1998, is promoted by Ankleshwar,
Gujarat-based Mr. Salahuddin Baig. The company is an authorized
dealer for HML, and has a showroom in Ankleshwar.


ATC LOGISTICS: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the rating on bank facilities of ATC Logistics
Private Limited (ATCPL) continues to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer
Not Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Term Loan               54       CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with ATCPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of ATCPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on ATCPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
ATCPL continues to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

ATCPL was promoted by Mr. Tutul Chowdhury in 2009 to provide
third-party logistics solutions. The promoter earlier operated ATC
India, a proprietorship firm engaged in material handling and
transportation for other large logistics solutions providers. ATCPL
has a logistics facility at Barasat in Kolkata, and has branches in
Sikkim, Jharkhand, Bihar, and Odisha. The company has leased out
665,700 square feet of warehouse space to companies such as Bharti
Airtel, M/s. P.N. Writers Corporation Private Limited, and Idea
Cellular, etc.


B SATYANARAYANA: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of B
Satyanarayana Reddy (BSNR) continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable/CRISIL
A4 Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Bank Guarantee         2.5       CRISIL A4 (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Cash Credit            2         CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Proposed Long Term     5.5       CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
   Bank Loan Facility               Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with BSNR for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of BSNR, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on BSNR
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
BSNR continues to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable/CRISIL A4 Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

B Satyanarayana Redddy (BSNR), established in 2003 as a
proprietorship concern is engaged in civil construction work (Roads
and Bridges), majorly For Department of Rural development. The
business activity of firm is confined to Krishna District (A.P) and
Khammam District (Telangana).


BANSAL BROTHERS: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the rating on bank facilities of Bansal
Brothers (Delhi) (BBRS) continues to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer
Not Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Overdraft Facility      12       CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with BBRS for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 30,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'


Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of BBRS, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on BBRS
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
BBRS continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Set up in 1953, BBRS is promoted by Mr. Yash Pal Bansal, Mr. Ravi
Lochan Gupta, and Mr. Bharat Bansal. It trades in cold-rolled (CR)
and hot-rolled (HR) steel coils.


BRITISH BIOLOGICALS: CRISIL Keeps B+ Rating in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the rating on bank facilities of British
Biologicals (BB) continues to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit             15       CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with BB for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of BB, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on BB is
consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on the
last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of BB
continues to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

British Biologicals, is a proprietorship firm founded in 1988 by
Mr. V. S. Reddy. It offers a wide range of nutritional supplements.
The firm's manufacturing facility is located in Bangalore.


GOKULAM INDUSTRIES: CRISIL Keeps B Ratings in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Gokulam
Industries (GI) continue to be 'CRISIL B/Stable Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit            5.0       CRISIL B/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Proposed Long Term     1.2       CRISIL B/Stable (Issuer Not
   Bank Loan Facility               Cooperating)

   Term Loan              0.8       CRISIL B/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with GI for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of GI, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on GI is
consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on the
last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of GI
continue to be 'CRISIL B/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Set up in September 2013 as a partnership firm, GI is engaged in
processing of pulses mainly Urad, Toor and Moong dal. The firm
commenced its daily operations from January 2015 onwards. The daily
operations are managed by the managing partner, Mr. R. Hariharan.


GRAFFITI LAMINATES: CRISIL Keeps B+ Ratings in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Graffiti
Laminates Private Limited (GLPL) continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable
Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit             3        CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Proposed Long Term     12.1      CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
   Bank Loan Facility               Cooperating)

   Term Loan               4.9      CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with GLPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of GLPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on GLPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
GLPL continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

GLPL, incorporated in 2013 and based in Morbi, Gujarat, is promoted
by Mr. Kevinkumar Arvind Bhuva, Mr. Raj Girish Khant, and Mr.
Sanjay Govind Vachchani. It started commercial production of
laminates in April 2014.

HAIKO LOGISTICS: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the rating on bank facilities of Haiko
Logistics India Private Limited (HLIPL) continues to be 'CRISIL
B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit            11.5      CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with HLIPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 30,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of HLIPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on HLIPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
HLIPL continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Incorporated in 2005 by Mr. Manoj Gupta, Mumbai-based HLIPL
provides logistic solutions such as freight forwarding services,
custom clearances and warehousing services to wide range of
customers.


HORIZON GLOBAL: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the rating on bank facilities of Horizon Global
Limited (HGL) continues to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit              6       CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with HGL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of HGL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on HGL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
HGL continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Incorporated in October 1999, HGL manufactures rubber and plastic
components for home appliances and the automobile industry. The
company, promoted by Mr. Praveen Kapoor, is based in Faridabad
(Haryana).


HOTEL ASHOK: CRISIL Keeps B Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
-----------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Hotel Ashok -
Thanjavur (HA) continue to be 'CRISIL B/Stable Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                          Amount
   Facilities          (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------          -----------    -------
   Proposed Long Term      1.2        CRISIL B/Stable (Issuer Not

   Bank Loan Facility                 Cooperating)

   Term Loan               8.8        CRISIL B/Stable (Issuer Not
                                      Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with HA for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of HA, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on HA is
consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on the
last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of HA
continue to be 'CRISIL B/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Set up in 2015 as a partnership firm by Mr. V Ashok, Mr. R
Vijaykumar, and their families, HA is setting up a 22-room hotel,
Hotel Ashok, in Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu. The project is currently
under construction and operations are expected to begin from April
2017.


IMMENSE INDUSTRIES: CRISIL Keeps D Ratings in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Immense
Industries Private Limited (IIPL) continue to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D
Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit            10        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Letter of Credit       35        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with IIPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of IIPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on IIPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
IIPL continue to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Incorporated in 1988, IIPL trades in yarn and metal products (scrap
ingots). Daily operations of the Delhi-based company are managed by
Mr. Somnath Harjai.


JAGAN INDUSTRIES: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the rating on bank facilities of Jagan
Industries Private Limited (JIPL; part of JTL group) continues to
be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit             4.5      CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with JIPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of JIPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on JIPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
JIPL continues to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

For arriving at the ratings, CRISIL Ratings has combined the
business and financial risk profiles of JIPL, JTL Infra Limited
(JTL) and Chetan Industries Ltd (CIL). That's because all these
companies, together referred to as the JTL group, are in the same
line of business, and have a common management and significant
financial and operational linkages.

                         About the Group

Incorporated in 1991 and promoted by the Chandigarh-based Singla
family, JTL manufactures black and galvanised steel tubes,
galvanised solar structures, and road crash barriers. The unit in
Dera Bassi, Punjab, has black steel tube manufacturing capacity of
8,000 tonne per month (tpm) and galvanised steel tube capacity of
4,000 tpm. Products are sold under the Jagan, Olympic, and Shri
Ganesh brands.

CIL manufactures steel tubes and hot-rolled (HR) coils at its unit
in Raipur, Chhattisgarh, which has black steel tube manufacturing
capacity of 10,000 tpm, galvanised steel tube capacity of 5,000
tpm, and HR coil manufacturing capacity of 10,000 tpm.

JIPL, incorporated in 1990 and promoted by the same family,
manufactures HR coils, galvanised pipes, and mild steel tubes. The
manufacturing unit in Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, has black steel
manufacturing capacity of 22,418 tonne per day.


JET AIRWAYS: Workers Seek Stay on Jalan-Kalrock Resolution Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
Livemint.com reports that the cabin and ground staff of Jet Airways
has moved an appellate tribunal seeking stay on the Jalan Kalrock
consortium's resolution plan, over concerns related to pending
salaries and retirement benefit.

In June, National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had approved Jalan
Kalrock consortium's resolution plan for Jet Airways, two years
after the airline was grounded, Livemint.com recalls. The full
service carrier had to shut down operations in April 2019 due to
financial woes and the insolvency resolution process commenced in
June the same year.

According to Livemint.com, the Jet Airways Cabin Crew Association
(JACCA) and Bhartiya Kamgar Sena, in their petition before the
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), have submitted
that dues of all workmen of the airline were not included as part
of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) cost.

Livemint.com relates that JACCA claims to represent a majority of
the airline's cabin crew, while Bhartiya Kamgar Sena claims to
represent more than 70 per cent of the airline's ground staff.

Livemint.com says the two Jet Airways employee groups have
requested the NCLAT to "quash and set aside" the order passed by
the NCLT's Mumbai Bench that approved the Jalan-Kalrock
consortium's resolution plan for Jet Airways. They have sought a
stay on the execution of this order till their petition is heard.

The petition has pointed out that the approved resolution plan
mandates demerger of Jet Airways' subsidiary Airjet Ground Services
Ltd (AGSL). Also, the services of the airline's employees, who were
on the payroll as on the date of approval of the resolution plan,
will be transferred to the demerged entity, Livemint.com relays.

"It further proposes that with the said demerger of employees, the
corporate debtor (Jet Airways) will not be liable for all the
retirement benefits of said demerged employees at all and the said
AGSL, which is not yet even operational, will be solely responsible
for the said liability," it further noted.

As per the petitioners, their members did not receive any salary
from March 2019 and had submitted their claims during the CIRP.

NCLT had assured earlier that entire ground staff, engineers and
pilots should be considered as an asset of the company,
Livemint.com notes. "The above observation by NCLT as well as the
approach of Respondent No 1 (Resolution Professional) clearly
depicts that the dues of all workmen were that point of time
considered as CIRP cost," the petitioners have contended.

According to the report, the petition has also sought a stay on the
proposed liquidation of the AGSL as well as sales of assets like
aircraft, aircraft spares and ground equipment of Jet Airways till
the NCLAT reaches a final decision.

Further, the employee groups have flagged the consortium's
requirement that if its proposal, dated July 5, 2021, was not
accepted by 95 per cent of the employees, then it would be entitled
to liquidate AGSL.

According to the petition, it was also mentioned that if any
employee challenges the proposal, then the proposal will stand
withdrawn, Livemint.com relays.

The proposal, dated July 5, pertains to employee dues and
retirement benefits, among others. It also mentioned that 76 per
cent of AGSL will be held by the Employees Welfare Trust of AGSL,
the report notes.

                         About Jet Airways

Based in Mumbai, India, Jet Airways (India) Limited was one of
India's top airlines founded by Naresh Goyal.  It provided
passenger and cargo air transportation services as well aircraft
leasing services. It operated flights to 66 destinations in India
and international countries.  

Jet Airways on April 17, 2019, halted all flight operations after
its lenders rejected its plea for emergency funds.

On June 20, 2019, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai
Bench, accepted an insolvency petition against Jet Airways filed by
its creditors as they attempt to recover some of their dues.

Ashish Chhawchharia of Grant Thornton India has been named as the
resolution professional in the case.  Law firm Cyril Amarchand
Mangaldas will represent the interests of the lenders' consortium,
according to a Reuters report.

Creditors have filed claims worth INR30,907 crore, according to
Financial Express.  The RP has so far admitted claims worth over
INR14,000 crore.

Jet Airways would be acquired by an investor consortium under a
multi-million dollar resolution plan approved by the carrier's
creditors on Oct. 17, 2020.


JITM TRUST: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
-----------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of JITM Trust
(Centurion University of technology and Management) (JITM; part of
the CUTM group) continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Overdraft Facility       5       CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Term Loan               32.95    CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with JITM for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of JITM, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on JITM
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
JITM continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

For arriving at its rating, CRISIL Ratings has changed its
analytical approach and combined the business and financial risk
profiles of JITM Trust (JITM), CSREM, and Centurion University of
Technology and Management (CUTM). The three entities, collectively
referred to as the CUTM group, are likely to be merged over the
medium term. Moreover, they have financial linkages and common
promoters.

CUTM, a private university, was formed by an Act of the Odisha
Legislative Assembly in 2010. CUTM has four campuses, at
Parlakhemundi, Bhubaneswar, Bolangir and Rayagada, offering
graduate and post-graduate engineering, management, and science
courses, apart from primary and secondary education, skill and
vocational training, social entrepreneurship initiatives, and
doctorate courses. The university includes School of Management,
School of Engineering and Technology, School of Vocational
Education and Training, School of Architecture Planning & Design,
School of Applied Science, School of Humanities & Social Science,
MS Swaminathan School of Agriculture, School of Media
Communication, School of Mines, School of Pharmacy & Life Sciences,
School of Paramedics and Allied Health Service, Institute of
Knowledge and Societies and PhD courses.


JOHN SAW: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of John Saw Mill
Private Limited (JSMPL) continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable/CRISIL A4
Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit             7        CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Inland/Import
   Letter of Credit       50        CRISIL A4 (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with JSMPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of JSMPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on JSMPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
JSMPL continues to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable/CRISIL A4 Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

JSMPL was incorporated in 2011 and is based in Tirunelveli, Tamil
Nadu. The company imports and trades in timber and is promoted by
Mr. S Maria John.


KALYAN GRAND: CRISIL Keeps B- Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Kalyan Grand
Stay Private Limited (KGSPL) continue to be 'CRISIL B-/Stable
Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Term Loan         25.5      CRISIL B-/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Proposed Long Term      1.5      CRISIL B-/Stable (Issuer Not
   Bank Loan Facility               Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with KGSPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of KGSPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on KGSPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
KGSPL continue to be 'CRISIL B-/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

KGSPL was incorporated by Mr. Saravana Prakash K and his family
members in 2011 and is based in Chennai. The company has a 3-star
business hotel, Kalyan Hometel, in Chennai, for which, it has an
operational and managerial tie-up with Sarovar.


M R REAL: Ind-Ra Affirms BB' LT Issuer Rating, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has affirmed M R Real Food
Private Limited's Long-Term Issuer Rating at 'IND BB'. The Outlook
is Stable.

The instrument-wise rating actions are:

-- INR90.00 mil. Fund-based working capital limits affirmed with
     IND BB/Stable rating; and

-- INR36.83 mil. (reduced from INR51.45 mil.) Term loan due on
     March 31, 2024 affirmed with IND BB/Stable rating.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The affirmation reflects MRRFPL's continued small scale of
operations. The company's revenue declined to INR767.77 million in
FY21 (FY20: INR893.01 million) owing to the COVID-19 led
operational disruptions. In 1QFY22, MRRFL achieved a revenue of
INR128 million. The agency expects the company's revenue to be
stable in FY22, subject to no further COVID-19 related lockdowns.
FY21 financials are provisional in nature.

The ratings also reflect MRRFPL's average EBITDA margin, which
deteriorated marginally to 3.66% in FY21 (FY20: 3.92%) owing to an
increase in the total variable overheads. The company's return on
capital employed stood at 14.60% in FY21 (FY20: 17.40%). The agency
expects the margin to remain stable in FY22.

Liquidity Indicator – Stretched: MRRFPL' average maximum
utilization of the fund-based limits was 74.72% during the last 12
months ended May 2021. The cash flow from operations and free cash
flows deteriorated to INR0.51 million in FY21 (FY20: INR44.67
million) and to INR1.03 million (INR39.67 million), respectively,
due to unfavorable changes in the working capital and the lower
absolute EBITDA. The company's net working capital cycle elongated
to seven days in FY21 (FY20: three days) due to an increase in the
inventory holding period. The cash and cash equivalents stood at
INR0.19 million at FYE21 (FYE20: INR22.52 million). MRRFPL does not
have any capital market exposure and relies on banks to meet its
funding requirements. It availed of the Reserve Bank of
India-prescribed moratorium over March-August 2020.

The ratings, however, are supported by MRRFPL's continued
comfortable, although deteriorated, credit metrics. The gross
interest coverage (operating EBITDA/gross interest expense)
deteriorated to 2.65x in FY21 (FY20: 3.13x) and the net financial
leverage (adjusted net debt/operating EBITDA) to 1.95x (1.26x) due
to a fall in the absolute EBITDA to INR28.10 million (INR35.05
million). Ind-Ra expects the credit metrics to improve in FY22
owing to the scheduled debt repayments.

The ratings, however, are supported by MRRFPL's promoters' three
decades of experience in the food and grain business.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Negative: Any further decline in revenue or the EBITDA margins,
leading to deterioration in the liquidity and the net leverage
exceeding 4x will be negative for the ratings.

Positive: An increase in the revenue or the EBITDA margins and any
improvement in the liquidity position while maintaining the credit
metrics will be positive for the ratings.

COMPANY PROFILE

Incorporated in August 2012, M R Real Food Private Limited (MRRFPL)
manufactures flour, refined flour, semolina and bran at its mills
located at Deoghar (Jharkhand) with an installed capacity of
250MT/day.


M.S. LUVISH: Ind-Ra Affirms 'BB' LT Issuer Rating, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has affirmed M.S. Luvish
Infosystems Private Limited's (MSLIPL) Long-Term Issuer Rating at
'IND BB'. The Outlook is Stable.

The instrument-wise rating action is:

-- INR1,101.76 bil. (reduced from INR1.20 bil.) Term loan* due on

     November 28, 2031 affirmed with IND BB+/Stable rating.

*Lease rental discounting (LRD) loan

The affirmation reflects MSLIPL's single revenue stream of property
rental, along with moderate debt service capabilities due to a
marginal difference between annual rental income and annual debt
repayment commitments.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

MSLIPL's scale of operations remains small with a revenue of
INR187.65 million in FY21 (FY20: INR182.45 million), its first full
year of operations. The company, engaged in the renting and leasing
of immovable properties, received rent from few tenants during FY21
with a few instances of delays, due to the disruptions caused by
the COVID-19 led lockdown. However, the company recovered the rent
from the tenants in FY21, as they were bound by agreements. FY21
numbers are provisional in nature.

MSIPL purchased a building named Espace with a total area of
231,089 square feet (sf) in Pune in December 2018, which had 99%
occupancy at end-March 2021. The company has 95% unexpired
contracts for 24-60 months till 30 September 2025. The remaining 4%
covers the expired contracts which are in the process of
finalization and 1% is estimated to commence from October 2021.
There are nine tenants in the building, of which MD India Health
Insurance TPA Private Limited covers 32% of the total area i.e.
74,613 sf.

The ratings factor in the company's modest EBITDA margin, which
improved to 85.47% in FY21 (FY20: 84.70%), due to a slight fall in
the administration expenses. The company's return on capital
employed was 8% in FY21 (FY20: 7%).

The ratings are constrained by the company's weak, although
improving credit metrics. Its interest coverage (operating
EBITDA/gross interest expense) stood at 1.2x in FY21 (FY20: 1.1x)
and net leverage (adjusted net debt/operating EBITDA) at 7.1x
(7.7x), owing to an increase in the EBITDA to INR160.39 million
(INR154.54 million).

Liquidity Indicator - Adequate: The agency believes MSLIPL's
liquidity is sufficient to meet its debt servicing obligations over
the tenor of the LRD debt owing to the waterfall mechanism. The
company's average debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) is 1.4x for
FY22-FY25. Furthermore, the rating factors in the presence of a
debt service reserve account (DSRA) equivalent to three months of
repayment obligations in the form of a lien marked fixed deposit to
be maintained throughout the tenor of the loan. There were no
instances of withdrawal from DSRA during the 12 months ended July
2021. MSLIPL's cash and cash equivalents stood at INR60.71 million
at FYE21 (FYE20: INR55.09 million). According to the management,
MSLIPL can be funded through its group companies in case of a
default.

The rating is supported by the company's promoters' (the Sani
Group) over two decades of experience in the LRD segment.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Negative: Any decline in the occupancy levels and/or delays in the
receipt of rental income, leading to the DSCR declining below 1.2x
and/or a decrease in the DSRA will be negative for the ratings.

Positive: A higher-than-expected rental income, leading to higher
cash generation and/or a substantial decline in the debt
subsequently leading to a strong improvement in the DSCR will be
positive for the ratings.

COMPANY PROFILE

MSLIPL is engaged in renting and leasing of immovable properties.
The property is located at Pune and has total area is 231,089 sf.
The company has six promoters and is a part of the Sani Group.


METAMORPHOSIS ENGITECH: Ind-Ra Assigns BB- Rating, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has assigned Metamorphosis
Engitech India Private Limited (MEIPL) a Long-Term Issuer Rating of
'IND BB-'. The Outlook is Stable.

The instrument-wise rating actions are:

-- INR310 mil. Fund-based working capital limits assigned with
     IND BB-/Stable/IND A4+ rating; and
  
-- INR24 mil. Non-fund-based working capital limit assigned with
     IND A4+ rating.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The ratings reflect MEIPL's small scale of operations, as indicated
by revenue of INR949.47 million in FY21 (FY20: INR652.34 million).
In FY21, the revenue improved due to the addition of customers from
February 2020 along with the capex incurred for capacity expansion
to support increased orders. MEIPL does not have an order book and
operates on running order basis. It booked revenue of INR350
million till 3MFY22. In FY22, Ind-Ra expects the revenue to improve
as the company would work on optimizing the utilization of the
available manufacturing capacity, and because of increased order
flow.

The ratings also factor in MEIPL's operating loss in FY21 due to
higher fixed overheads. The company has been taking improvement
measures by focusing on increasing the revenue (5% currently) from
the international market to improve the operating leverage.

The ratings are constrained by MEIPL's modest credit metrics due to
the operating losses in FY21. The debt servicing has so far been
aided by unsecured loans from the promoters. In FY22, Ind-Ra
expects the credit metrics to improve on account of the profit
earned because of improved operating leverage backed by optimizing
the available manufacturing capacity.

Liquidity Indicator - Poor: MEIPL's average maximum utilization of
the fund-based limits was 95% and non-fund-based limits was 0%
during the past 12 months. Both the cash flow from operations and
free cash flow were negative at INR396 million and INR427.08
million in FY21 (FY20: negative INR166.99 million and negative
INR756.72 million) due to high working capital requirements. The
net working capital cycle is long and elongated to176 days in FY21
(FY20: 153 days) due to a rise in the receivables to 111 days (83
days). The cash and cash equivalents stood at INR8.37 million in
FYE21 (FYE20: INR4.91 million). Furthermore, MEIPL does not have
any capital market exposure and relies on the promoters, banks and
financial institutions to meet its funding requirements.

However, the ratings are supported by the promoters' nearly three
decades of experience in metal, cement, consumable products, oil
and gas industries. This has facilitated the company to establish
strong relationships with customers as well as suppliers.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Negative: Lower-than-expected scale of operations, resulting in
deterioration in the credit metrics with interest coverage below
1.5x in FY22 and/or deterioration in the liquidity could be
negative for the ratings.

Positive: A significant increase in the scale of operations,
resulting in an improvement in the credit metrics and liquidity on
a sustained basis could be positive for the ratings.

COMPANY PROFILE

Incorporated in March 2018, MEIPL manufactures precision tubes,
electric resistance welded tubes, drawn over mandrel/ cold drawn
electric welded tubes at its 6,000 mt/month facility located in
Pune (Maharashtra).


MSR SEA: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of MSR Sea Foods
continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit             5        CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Proposed Cash          20        CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
   Credit Limit                     Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with MSR for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of MSR, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on MSR
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
MSR continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Set up in 2015, Narsapuram, Andhra Pradesh-based MSR, a partnership
firm of Mr. M Srinivasa Rao, and family, trades in shrimps.
Commercial operations are started in fiscal 2019.


RMJ MODERN: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
-----------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of RMJ Modern
Rice Mill (RMJ) continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit            10.5      CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Standby Line            1.5      CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
   of Credit                        Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with RMJ for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of RMJ, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on RMJ
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
RMJ continues to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Set up in 2006, Madurai-based RMJ is a partnership firm that
processes and sells non-basmati rice. Mr. J Thangapandi, Mr.
Sundara Pandian and Ms Udaya Banu are the partners.


RNV INDUSTRIES: CRISIL Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of RNV
Industries Private Limited (RIPL; a part of the RNV Arya group)
continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable/CRISIL A4 Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit            75        CRISIL B+/Stable (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Letter of Credit      125        CRISIL A4 (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with RIPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of RIPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on RIPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
RIPL continue to be 'CRISIL B+/Stable/CRISIL A4 Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

RIPL was incorporated in July 2012 and commenced operations in
April 2013; IIPL was incorporated in September 2012 and commenced
operations in April 2014. Both companies are promoted by Mr.
Ravindrakumar Arya and his sons, Mr. Nakul Arya and Mr. Varun Arya.
Both the companies (a part of the RNV Arya group) trade-in hot- and
cold-rolled steel coils and sheets.

The RNV Arya group is a part of the Arya group which has diverse
business interests including manufacturing iron and steel, import
of and trading in steel products, and ship-breaking and
ship-chartering activities.


S M ENTERPRISES: CRISIL Lowers Rating on INR17cr Loan to D
----------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings has downgraded the ratings on S M Enterprises - East
Delhi (SME) to 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating' from
'CRISIL B+/Stable/CRISIL A4 Issuer Not Cooperating'

                         Amount
   Facilities         (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------         -----------    -------
   Proposed Long Term      17        CRISIL D (ISSUER NOT
   Bank Loan Facility                COOPERATING; Downgraded from
                                     'CRISIL B+/Stable ISSUER NOT
                                     COOPERATING')

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with SME for
obtaining information through letters and emails, apart from
telephonic communication. However, the issuer has remained non
cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of SME, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on SME
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, CRISIL Ratings has downgraded the
ratings to 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating' from 'CRISIL
B+/Stable/CRISIL A4 Issuer Not Cooperating', as the company has
delayed in servicing of term debt-obligations.

Set up as a proprietorship concern by Mr. Bharat Kalra, SME is
engaged into supply of construction and building materials.

SAFAL FLEXIBOND: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Safal
Flexibond Private Limited continue to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit            22.5      CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Term Loan               1.0      CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with Safal for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 29, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of Safal, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on Safal
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
Safal continue to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Safal was established in 2009, by the promoters, Mr. Prashant
Thakkar, his brother Mr. Hemal Thakkar, and their mother, Mrs Niru
Thakkar. The company manufactures self-adhesive/BOPP tapes. Its
manufacturing unit at Kubadthal in Ahmedabad, has an installed
capacity of 25 crore square metre per annum, of which around 60%
capacity is being utilized currently.


SAGAR MILK: CRISIL Lowers Rating on INR9cr LT Loan to B
-------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings has revised the rating on bank facilities of Sagar
Milk Chilling Centre (SMCC) to 'CRISIL B/Stable Issuer Not
Cooperating' from 'CRISIL BB-/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                          Amount
   Facilities          (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------          -----------    -------
   Proposed Long Term        9        CRISIL B/Stable (ISSUER NOT
   Bank Loan Facility                 COOPERATING; Revised from
                                      'CRISIL BB-/Stable ISSUER
                                      NOT COOPERATING')

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with SMCC for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of SMCC, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on SMCC
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
SMCC Revised to 'CRISIL B/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating' from
'CRISIL BB-/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

West Bengal-based SMCC, a proprietorship concern of Ms Rubi Ghosh,
is engaged in wholesale procurement and supply of milk.


SATYAM EXIMTEX: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the rating on bank facilities of Satyam Eximtex
International Private Limited (SEIPL) continues to be 'CRISIL D
Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit              50      CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with SEIPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of SEIPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on SEIPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
SEIPL continues to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Incorporated in 2014, SEIPL is a Mumbai-based company engaged in
trading grey fabrics and cotton yarn. SEIPL has its registered
office in Mumbai and is promoted by the Varma family. Prior to
2014, the company was operating by the name of Amanvir Trading Pvt.
Ltd.


SEHGAL AUTORIDERS: CRISIL Lowers Rating on INR28.5cr Loan to B
--------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings has revised the ratings on bank facilities of Sehgal
Autoriders Private Limited (SAPL) to 'CRISIL B/Stable Issuer Not
Cooperating' from 'CRISIL BB/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Drop Line               5        CRISIL B/Stable (ISSUER NOT
   Overdraft Facility               COOPERATING; Revised from
                                    'CRISIL BB/Stable ISSUER NOT
                                    COOPERATING')

   Electronic Dealer      28.5      CRISIL B/Stable (ISSUER NOT
   Financing Scheme                 COOPERATING; Revised from
   (e-DFS)                          'CRISIL BB/Stable ISSUER NOT
                                    COOPERATING')

   Rupee Term Loan         1.5      CRISIL B/Stable (ISSUER NOT
                                    COOPERATING; Revised from
                                    'CRISIL BB/Stable ISSUER NOT
                                    COOPERATING')

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with SAPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of SAPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on SAPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
SAPL Revised to 'CRISIL B/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating' from
'CRISIL BB/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

SAPL, promoted by Mr. Rabinderpal Singh Sehgal, has been a dealing
in HML's two wheelers since 1998. In April 2011, it took over the
dealership of MSIL vehicles, and has four showrooms-cum-workshops
for MSIL, and one NEXA (MSIL's premium dealership network) showroom
in Pune.


SHANTI COLD: CRISIL Keeps B- Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Shanti Cold
Storage & Ice Factory (SCSIF) continue to be 'CRISIL B-/Stable
Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                          Amount
   Facilities          (INR Crore)   Ratings
   ----------          -----------   -------
   Proposed Long Term      0.25      CRISIL B-/Stable (Issuer Not
   Bank Loan Facility                Cooperating)

   Term Loan               5.45      CRISIL B-/Stable (Issuer Not
                                     Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with SCSIF for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 9, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of SCSIF, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on SCSIF
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
SCSIF continue to be 'CRISIL B-/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Incorporated in 2018, SCSIF is engaged in cold storage in Madhya
Pradesh. It is promoted and managed by Mr. Anuj Gupta.


SHASHI DETECTIVE: CRISIL Lowers Rating on INR2cr New Loan to B
--------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings has revised the ratings on bank facilities of Shashi
Detective Services Private Limited (SDS) to 'CRISIL B/Stable Issuer
Not Cooperating' from 'CRISIL BB+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                          Amount
   Facilities          (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------          -----------    -------
   Proposed Long Term        2        CRISIL B/Stable (ISSUER NOT
   Bank Loan Facility                 COOPERATING; Revised from
                                      'CRISIL BB+/Stable ISSUER
                                      NOT COOPERATING')

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with SDS for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated January 26,
2021 and July 29, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of SDS, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on SDS
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
SDS Revised to 'CRISIL B/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating' from
'CRISIL BB+/Stable Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Incorporated in 1989, SDS is a Bangalore-based company which is in
the business of providing professional security services like
Guarding Services, Detective Services and other value-added
service. The company is based out of Bangalore and is promoted by
Mr. B. M. Shashidhar.


SHIVANI LOCKS: CRISIL Moves B+ Debt Ratings to Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings has migrated the rating on bank facilities of
Shivani Locks Private Limited (SLPL) to 'CRISIL B+/Stable/CRISIL A4
Issuer not cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)    Ratings
   ----------        -----------    -------
   Cash Credit             15       CRISIL B+/Stable (ISSUER NOT
                                    COOPERATING; Rating Migrated)

   Letter of Credit         1       CRISIL A4 (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Proposed Long Term       4       CRISIL B+/Stable (ISSUER NOT
   Bank Loan Facility               COOPERATING; Rating Migrated)

   Term Loan               25       CRISIL B+/Stable (ISSUER NOT
                                    COOPERATING; Rating Migrated)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with SLPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated June 30,
2021 and July 20, 2021 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of SLPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on SLPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'.
Therefore, on account of inadequate information and lack of
management cooperation, CRISIL Ratings has migrated the rating on
bank facilities of SLPL to 'CRISIL B+/Stable/CRISIL A4 Issuer not
cooperating'.

CRISIL Ratings has consolidated the business and financial risk
profile of SLPL with its group companies Venus Stampings Private
Limited (VSPL) and Venus Industrial Corporation Pvt Ltd (VICPL),
together referred as the Venus group, as all the companies are
engaged in similar line of business and have common management.

                          About the Group

SLPL was incorporated in 1988 by Mr. D N Kathuria, Mr. K L
Kathuria, Mr. Naresh Kathuria and Mr. Raj Kathuria. The company is
engaged in the manufacturing of precision sheet metal components,
primarily, to the automotive industry. The company's manufacturing
facilities are situated at Faridabad, Haryana.

VICPL was incorporated in 1996 by Mr. D N Kathuria, Mr. R D
Kathuria & Mr. K L Kathuria. The company is engaged in the
manufacturing of precision sheet metal components, primarily, to
the automotive industry. The company's manufacturing facilities are
situated at Faridabad, Haryana.

VSPL was incorporated in 1985 by Mr. KrishanLal Kathuria and
family. The company is engaged into manufacturing of electrical
lamination for electric motors, starter motors, alternators, wiper
motors, radiator fan motors, switch gear controls and energy
meters. The company's manufacturing facilities are situated at
Faridabad, Haryana.


ST PIPES: Ind-Ra Keeps 'BB-' LT Issuer Rating in Non-Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has maintained ST Pipes and
Tubes Co.'s Long-Term Issuer Rating of 'IND BB- (ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING)' in the non-cooperating category and has
simultaneously withdrawn it.

The instrument-wise rating actions are:

-- INR200 mil. Fund-based facilities* maintained in non-
     cooperating category and withdrawn; and

-- INR150 mil. Non-fund-based facilities# maintained in non-
     cooperating category and withdrawn;

*Maintained at 'IND BB- (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)'/'IND A4+ (ISSUER
NOT COOPERATING)' before being withdrawn

#Maintained at 'IND A4+ (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)' before being
withdrawn

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The ratings have been maintained in the non-cooperating category
because the issuer did not participate in the rating exercise
despite continuous requests and follow-ups by Ind-Ra.

Ind-Ra is no longer required to maintain the ratings, as it has
received a no-objection certificate from the lender. This is
consistent with the Securities and Exchange Board of India's
circular dated March 31, 2017 for credit rating agencies.

COMPANY PROFILE

Incorporated in March 2016, ST Pipes and Tubes Co.is a partnership
firm engaged in manufacturing of steel tubes with an installed
capacity of 74,880tpa.




=================
S I N G A P O R E
=================

BRIGHTOIL 319: Commences Wind-Up Proceedings
--------------------------------------------
Members of Brightoil 319 Oil Tanker Pte. Ltd. and its related
entities on Aug. 16, 2021, passed a resolution to voluntarily wind
up the company's operations.

Brightoil 319's related entities are:

   - Brightoil 326 Oil Tanker Pte. Ltd.
   - Brightoil 329 Oil Tanker Pte. Ltd.
   - Brightoil 639 Oil Tanker Pte. Ltd.
   - Brightoil 666 Oil Tanker Pte. Ltd.
   - Brightoil 688 Oil Tanker Pte. Ltd.

Mr. Tee Wey Lih of Acres Advisory Pte Ltd was appointed Provisional
Liquidator of Brightoil 319 et al. on Aug. 16, 2021.


DEXTRA PARTNERS: Court to Hear Wind-Up Petition on Aug. 27
----------------------------------------------------------
A petition to wind up the operations of Dextra Partners Pte Ltd
will be heard before the High Court of Singapore on Aug. 27, 2021,
at 10:00 a.m.

Lavrentios Lavrentiadis filed the petition against the company on
Aug. 6, 2021.

The Petitioner's solicitors are:

         WongPartnership LLP
         12 Marina Boulevard
         Level 28, Marina Bay Financial Centre Tower 3
         Singapore 018982


DIGITAL ALPHA: FTI Appointed as Interim Judicial Managers
---------------------------------------------------------
Yit Chee Wah and Ellyn Tan Huixian of FTI Consulting (Singapore)
Pte. Ltd., were appointed as interim judicial managers of Digital
Alpha Group Pte. Ltd. on Aug. 16, 2021.

The interim judicial managers can be reached at:

         Yit Chee Wah
         Ellyn Tan Huixian
         FTI Consulting (Singapore) Pte Ltd
         8 Shenton Way, #32-03 AXA Tower
         Singapore 068811


PARASTRUCT INNOVATIONS: Court Enters Wind-Up Order
--------------------------------------------------
The High Court of Singapore entered an order on Aug. 13, 2021, to
wind up the operations of Parastruct Innovations Pte. Ltd.

Wesley Gerard D'Aranjo filed the petition against the company.

The company's liquidator is:

         Farooq Ahmad Mann
         c/o Mann & Associates PAC
         3 Shenton Way, #03-06C
         Shenton House
         Singapore 068805




=====================
S O U T H   K O R E A
=====================

DOOSAN HEAVY: Hyundai Heavy Completes Takeover of Doosan Infracore
------------------------------------------------------------------
Yonhap News Agency reports that Hyundai Heavy Industries Holdings
Co. (HHIH), the world's largest shipbuilding group, said Aug. 20
that it has completed the process to acquire South Korea's top
construction equipment maker Doosan Infracore Co.

HHIH formed a consortium with KDB Investment Co., a private equity
firm wholly owned by the state-run Korea Development Bank, to buy
Doosan Infracore from cash-strapped Doosan Heavy Industries &
Construction Co. for KRW850 billion (US$720 million) late last
year, Yonhap recalls.

In July, HHIH established its second subholding company Hyundai
Genuine Co. to control its construction machinery maker Hyundai
Construction Equipment Co. and Doosan Infracore.

In South Korea, three construction equipment makers -- Doosan
Infracore, Hyundai Construction Equipment and Volvo Construction
Equipment -- are vying to expand their presence.

HHIH has another subholding company Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore
Engineering Co. (KSOE) to control three shipbuilding companies --
Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Hyundai Mipo Dockyard Co. and Hyundai
Samho Heavy Industries Co.

KSOE has been pushing for the takeover of South Korea's
second-largest shipbuilder Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering
Co., the report notes.


On Aug. 18, Doosan Infracore finished legal dispute with its
financial investors including Mirae Asset Private Equity, which are
related to its Chinese unit Doosan Infracore China Co. (DICC) by
buying back 20 percent stake in DICC from them for KRW305 billion,
according to Yonhap.

In 2011, Doosan Infracore invited financial investors of DICC to
make inroads into the Chinese construction equipment market and
repay its debts, promising to help them retrieve their investment
by listing the shares of DICC on the Chinese market within three
years, Yonhap notes.

In return for investments worth KRW380 billion, Doosan Infracore
gave a 20 percent stake in DICC to financial investors, holding on
to a 80 percent stake of its Chinese unit.

Yonhap says Doosan Infracore promised that it would list DICC on
China's stock market to ensure profits of financial investors, but
failed to list it on the stock market.

Financial investors filed a lawsuit against Doosan Infracore to
retrieve their investment in November 2015.

Based in South Korea, Doosan Heavy Industry & Construction Co.
(SEO:034020) -- http://www.doosanheavy.com-- is engaged in
supplying industrial facilities to both domestic and international
plant markets.


                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Asia Pacific is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Joy A. Agravante, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2021.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9482.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding,
electronic re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited
without prior written permission of the publishers.
Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed
to be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

TCR-AP subscription rate is US$775 for 6 months delivered via e-
mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance
thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information, contact
Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.



                *** End of Transmission ***