/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCRAP_Public/220824.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                     A S I A   P A C I F I C

          Wednesday, August 24, 2022, Vol. 25, No. 163

                           Headlines



A U S T R A L I A

BOOMER HOME: Placed in Administration; Seeks Recapitalization
CA PLUMBING: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Sept. 1
CORRECT AIR: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Aug. 30
FP TURBO 2021-1: Moody's Upgrades Rating on Class E Notes to Ba1
JOHN WAYLAND: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Aug. 31

MOBILIA GROUP: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Aug. 31
MR YUM: Startup to Cut 17% of Workforce
PEPPER PRIME 2022-2: S&P Assigns Prelim. B+ Rating on F Notes
SOCIAL ENERGY: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Aug. 31


C H I N A

BRIGHT SCHOLAR: Moody's Withdraws 'B2' Corporate Family Rating
KUN PENG: Incurs $690,000 Net Loss in Third Quarter
SEAZEN COMPANIES: S&P Lowers ICR to 'BB', Outlook Negative


I N D I A

10I COMMERCE: Files for Bankruptcy Protection
ANANDALOK HOSPITAL: ICRA Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
BHALKESHWAR SUGARS: CRISIL Keeps D Ratings in Not Cooperating
BIYANI SHIKSHAN: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
BUSH TEA: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating Category

CHEM STAR: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating Category
DEEPA DEVELOPERS: ICRA Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
DHARMRAJ ALUMINIUM: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
FSD BUILDING: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
FUTURE RETAIL: Lenders Submit Loan Claims of US$2.64 Billion

KRISHNAAM MOBILE: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
LOK ENTERPRISES: ICRA Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
MA CHANDI: CRISIL Keeps D Ratings in Not Cooperating Category
MADHAVA HYTECH: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
MSR ENTERPRISES: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating

NHS INDUSTRIES: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
OMEGA PREMISES: CRISIL Reaffirms B Rating on INR9.39cr Disc. Loan
PRASAD SUGAR: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
PRAVEEN ELECTRICAL: CRISIL Keeps D Ratings in Not Cooperating
S. RASIKLAL: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating

SAEL RG1: Fitch Withdraws BB(EXP) Rating on New USD Notes
SARIN'S: CRISIL Reaffirms B+ Rating on INR0.75cr Demand Loan
SETCO AUTO: ICRA Hikes Rating on INR215cr NCD from D
SR CYLINDERS: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
TRISTAR INTERCONTINENTAL: ICRA Keeps D Ratings in Not Cooperating



J A P A N

MITSUBISHI HEAVY: Supreme Court Yet to Rule on Liquidating Assets
MITSUBISHI MOTORS: S&P Affirms 'BB' LT ICR & Alters Outlook to Pos.


N E W   Z E A L A N D

ARMSTRONG DOWNES: Playground Won't Open in Time for Summer
AUBREY EDWARD: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due on Sept. 15
CORRECTIVE BUILDING: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due on Sept. 20
JDS BUILDING: Court to Hear Wind-Up Petition on Aug. 25
LOMAS TRUSTEES: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due on Sept. 15

NICOLL GROUP: Court to Hear Wind-Up Petition on Sept. 8
QUEST INSURANCE: A.M. Best Affirms B(Fair) Fin. Strength Rating
WHITE SWAN: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due on Sept. 15


P A K I S T A N

PAKISTAN: CB Rates at 15%, To Closely Watch Inflation


V I E T N A M

DAT XANH: Fitch Affirms 'B' IDR & Then Withdraws Rating

                           - - - - -


=================
A U S T R A L I A
=================

BOOMER HOME: Placed in Administration; Seeks Recapitalization
-------------------------------------------------------------
Your Mortgage reports that Perth-based Boomer Home Loans, which
officially launched early this year, is seeking recapitalisation
following the withdrawal of planned financing from an institutional
funder.

According to Your Mortgage, KordaMentha partner Richard Tucker, who
was appointed voluntary administrator to the Boomer Home Loans
Group along with another partner Kate Conneely, said the
institutional funder had been in "very advanced negotiations" with
the fintech for the past eight months.

"There are excellent growth prospects for Boomer, given the
demographic trends in Australia - the company has received
significant interest in its products since launching them to market
in May," the report quotes Mr. Tucker as saying.

Your Mortgage relates that Mr. Tucker said the priority at the
moment is to open the table for "urgent expressions of interest"
for the recapitalisation of the group.

"Boomer is a distinctive brand that offers a niche service other
lenders are unable to bring. Given the amount of capital in the
global markets, we believe Boomer will provide an attractive
platform for capital to find a home in a tier 1 jurisdiction with
tier 1 capital."

Boomer was set to disrupt the traditional lending market by
becoming the first Australian lender to specialise in home loans
for over-55s.

Prior to its launch in April, Boomer said it has raised over $13
million in capital from investors comprising of property management
fintech entrepreneur Jindou Lee from HappyCo, former Fortescue
Metals Group Chief Financial Officer Stephen Pearce, and former BNK
Bank CEO Simon Lyons.

Boomer aims to address the challenges faced by retiring Australians
- it complements the recently relaunched Home Equity Access Scheme
by the federal government, which enables older Australians to draw
a fortnightly payment using the equity in their home.

Your Mortgage adds that Boomer Home Loans CEO Scott Phillips said
the gap in financial services for people aged over 55 was a
significant national problem.

"Millions of Australians enter retirement with the equity in their
home being their most valuable asset and not enough in savings or
super to support another 40 years of living costs, while many also
commence retirement still paying off their home loan," he said in a
statement earlier this year.

"We believe that Australians over 55 deserve a better deal. They
deserve a home loan lender that not only understands their unique
needs but will help them plan and manage their finances in the
lead-up to, and throughout, retirement."

Richard Tucker and Kate Conneely of KordaMentha were appointed as
Administrators of the Boomer Home Loans Group on Aug. 15, 2022.


CA PLUMBING: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Sept. 1
-----------------------------------------------------
A first meeting of the creditors in the proceedings of CA Plumbing
Pty Ltd will be held on Sept. 1, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. via virtual
meeting technology.

Con Kokkinos of Worrells was appointed as administrator of the
company on Aug. 22, 2022.


CORRECT AIR: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Aug. 30
-----------------------------------------------------
A first meeting of the creditors in the proceedings of Correct Air
Services Pty Ltd will be held on Aug. 30, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. via
teleconference.

Sule Arnautovic and John Vouris of Hall Chadwick were appointed as
administrators of the company on Aug. 22, 2022.


FP TURBO 2021-1: Moody's Upgrades Rating on Class E Notes to Ba1
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has upgraded the ratings on eight classes
of notes issued by two FP Turbo Series ABS.

The affected ratings are as follows:

Issuer: FP Turbo Series 2019-1 Trust

Class C Notes, Upgraded to Aaa (sf); previously on Dec 21, 2021
Upgraded to Aa1 (sf)

Class E Notes, Upgraded to Aa1 (sf); previously on Dec 21, 2021
Upgraded to A1 (sf)

Class F Notes, Upgraded to A2 (sf); previously on Dec 21, 2021
Upgraded to Ba1 (sf)

Issuer: FP Turbo Series 2021-1 Trust

Class B Notes, Upgraded to Aaa (sf); previously on Dec 21, 2021
Upgraded to Aa1 (sf)

Class C Notes, Upgraded to Aa2 (sf); previously on Dec 21, 2021
Upgraded to A1 (sf)

Class D Notes, Upgraded to A1 (sf); previously on Dec 21, 2021
Upgraded to A3 (sf)

Class E Notes, Upgraded to Ba1 (sf); previously on Mar 18, 2021
Definitive Rating Assigned Ba2 (sf)

Class F Notes, Upgraded to Ba3 (sf); previously on Mar 18, 2021
Definitive Rating Assigned B1 (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The upgrades were prompted by an increase in note subordination
available for the affected notes and the good performance of the
underlying collateral pools to date.

FP Turbo Series 2019-1 Trust

Following the July 2022 payment date, the note subordination
available for the Class C, Class E and Class F Notes has increased
rapidly to 36.9%, 30.3% and 19.4%, respectively, from 26.3%, 18.7%
and 12% at the time of the last rating action for these notes in
December 2021.

As of June 2022, 0.7% of the outstanding pool was 30-plus day
delinquent, and 0.1% was 90-plus day delinquent. The portfolio has
incurred 0.005% (as of % of original balance) of losses to date,
which have been covered by excess spread.

Based on the current portfolio characteristics and historical
performance data, Moody's has updated the haircuts to the residual
value cash flow: Aaa haircut of 38.5%, Aa1 haircut of 30.8% and A2
haircut of 24.5%.

FP Turbo Series 2021-1 Trust

Following the July 2022 payment date, the note subordination
available for the Class B, Class C, and Class D Notes has increased
to 24.2%, 18.7% and 16.1%, respectively, from 18.9%, 14.6% and
12.6%, at the time of the last rating action for these notes in
December 2021. Note subordination available for the Class E and
Class F Notes has increased to 10% and 7.9%, respectively, from
6.3% and 5%, at closing.

As of June 2022, 0.6% of the outstanding pool was 30-plus day
delinquent, and 0.1% was 90-plus day delinquent. The portfolio has
incurred 0.01% (as of % of original balance) of losses to date,
which have been covered by excess spread.

Based on the current portfolio characteristics and historical
performance data, Moody's has maintained the haircuts to the
residual value cash flow: Aaa haircut of 38.5%, Aa2 haircut of
29.4%, A1 haircut of 26%, Ba1 haircut of 17.3% and Ba3 haircut of
13.5%.

The transactions are Australian cash securitisation of operating,
novated and finance leases extended to Australian government and
statutory corporations, corporates, small and medium-sized
businesses and their employees. The leases are secured by passenger
cars, commercial vehicles and equipment.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Auto Loan- and Lease-Backed ABS" published in
July 2022.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

Factors that could lead to an upgrade of the ratings include (1)
performance of the underlying collateral that is better than
Moody's expectations, and (2) an increase in credit enhancement
available for the notes.

Factors that could lead to a downgrade of the ratings include (1)
performance of the underlying collateral that is worse than Moody's
expectations, (2) a decrease in credit enhancement available for
the notes, and (3) a deterioration in the credit quality of the
transaction counterparties.


JOHN WAYLAND: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Aug. 31
------------------------------------------------------
A first meeting of the creditors in the proceedings of John Wayland
Pty Ltd (trading as "Hunter & Newcastle Properties" and "Carbon
Managers") will be held on Aug. 31, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. via
teleconference.

Kathleen Vouris and Richard Albarran of Hall Chadwick were
appointed as administrators of the company on Aug. 19, 2022.


MOBILIA GROUP: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Aug. 31
-------------------------------------------------------
A first meeting of the creditors in the proceedings of Mobilia
Group Australasia Pty Ltd will be held on Aug. 31, 2022, at 3:00
p.m. via teleconference only.

Mohammad Najjar of Vanguard Insolvency Australia was appointed as
administrator of the company on Aug. 19, 2022.


MR YUM: Startup to Cut 17% of Workforce
---------------------------------------
SmartCompany reports that digital menu and restaurant ordering
startup Mr Yum will lay off nearly one in five workers, becoming
the latest Australian firm to slash its headcount as market
expectations dim.

Taking to LinkedIn on Aug. 23, co-founder Kim Teo shared an email
sent to staff detailing the "hardest decision we've made in Mr
Yum's journey," SmartCompany relays.

"After deeply exploring every option available, we have made the
decision to reduce the Mr Yum team by approximately 17% to extend
our runway while capital markets remain uncertain," the report
quotes Ms. Teo as saying.

Mr Yum counted a global team of 260 employees in May after
acquiring MyGuestList, suggesting the layoffs will affect around 44
people at the company.

The decision was borne of changing market sentiment in 2022, Ms.
Teo said.

Unlike the heady days of late 2021, in which Mr Yum raised its $89
million Series A round, rising inflation is now compressing
economic growth projections and deterring big-name funds from
massive investment pledges.

"We completely accept and own that we increased our headcount too
quickly," Ms. Teo said.

"We made an assumption that the strong economic environment would
continue deeper into 2022; instead, conditions deteriorated rapidly
in May, back when we first communicated the situation with you, and
capital markets have remained soft since."

According to SmartCompany, the announcement comes just days after
Mr Yum was selected for the Victorian Government's 30×30 program,
designed to propel local startups to billion-dollar valuations by
the end of the decade.

SmartCompany relates that Ms. Teo said Mr Yum intended the
headcount reduction to be the company's last as it seeks continual
growth in the Australian and overseas markets.

Impacted employees will be granted six weeks of severance on top of
their notice periods, "accelerated" stock option vesting tied to Mr
Yum's next corporate milestone, and extended access to Mr Yum's
mental health support services.

Workers laid off from the company will also face "career transition
support" from Mr Yum, Ms. Teo said, SmartCompany relays.

Such support is expected to include CV and interview advice,
coaching, and introductions to employers who may be interested in
taking on former Mr. Yum staff.

SmartCompany relates that the company may soon follow in the
footsteps of Australian companies like Linktree, which last week
publicly shared a spreadsheet featuring the names and contact
details of the 38 employees employees impacted by its own
redundancy round.

In doing so, Linktree emulated Swedish buy now, pay later player
Klarna, whose CEO made headlines in June by sharing a spreadsheet
of recently laid-off employee details.

Companies interested in hiring Mr Yum staff impacted by the
decision can also contact the company directly, adds SmartCompany.


PEPPER PRIME 2022-2: S&P Assigns Prelim. B+ Rating on F Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary ratings to seven
classes of prime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) to
be issued by Permanent Custodians Ltd. as trustee of Pepper Prime
2022-2 Trust. Pepper Prime 2022-2 Trust is a securitization of
prime residential mortgages originated by Pepper Homeloans Pty Ltd.
(Pepper).

The preliminary ratings reflect:

-- S&P's view of the credit risk of the underlying collateral
portfolio, including our view that the credit support is sufficient
to withstand the stresses it applies. The credit support for the
rated notes comprises note subordination and excess spread. The
assessment of credit risk considers the underwriting standards and
centralized approval process of the seller, Pepper.

-- S&P's expectation that the various mechanisms to support
liquidity within the transaction, including an amortizing liquidity
facility equal to 1.5% of the invested amount of all notes, subject
to a floor, principal draws, and an excess spread reserve that
builds from excess spread, are sufficient under its stress
assumptions to ensure timely payment of interest.

-- The extraordinary expense reserve of A$150,000, funded by
Pepper Money Ltd. on or before closing, available to meet
extraordinary expenses. The reserve will be topped up via excess
spread if drawn.

-- The legal structure of the trust, which has been established as
a special-purpose entity and meets S&P's criteria for insolvency
remoteness.

  Preliminary Ratings Assigned

  Pepper Prime 2022-2 Trust

  Class A1, A$552.5 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A2, A$61.75 million: AAA (sf)
  Class B, A$10.4 million: AA (sf)
  Class C, A$9.1 million: A (sf)
  Class D, A$6.5 million: BBB (sf)
  Class E, A$3.9 million: BB+ (sf)
  Class F, A$3.25 million: B+ (sf)
  Class G, A$2.6 million: Not rated


SOCIAL ENERGY: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Aug. 31
-------------------------------------------------------
A first meeting of the creditors in the proceedings of Social
Energy Australia Pty Ltd will be held on Aug. 31, 2022, at 3:30
p.m. via virtual meeting technology.

Philip Campbell Wilson of Grant Thornton Australia was appointed as
administrator of the company on Aug. 19, 2022.




=========
C H I N A
=========

BRIGHT SCHOLAR: Moody's Withdraws 'B2' Corporate Family Rating
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has withdrawn the B2 corporate family
rating of Bright Scholar Education Holdings Ltd. Prior to the
withdrawal, the rating outlook on Bright Scholar was negative.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's has decided to withdraw the rating for its own business
reasons.

COMPANY PROFILE

Bright Scholar Education Holdings Ltd (Bright Scholar) was listed
on the New York Stock Exchange in May 2017. It provides education
services in China and overseas.

KUN PENG: Incurs $690,000 Net Loss in Third Quarter
---------------------------------------------------
Kun Peng International Ltd. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $689,999 on $642,596 of revenue for the three months ended June
30, 2022, compared to a net loss of $1.63 million on $452,027 of
revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2021.

For the nine months ended June 30, 2022, the Company reported a net
loss of $966,818 on $7.33 million of revenue compared to a net loss
of $2.27 million on $2.63 million of revenue for the same period in
2021.

As of June 30, 2022, the Company had $1.75 million in total assets,
$4.62 million in total liabilities, and a total deficit of $2.87
million.

As of June 30, 2022 and Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had a cash and
cash equivalents balance of $263,740 and $2,059,685, respectively.

Kun Peng said, "We require additional cash of approximately $1.1
million within the next twelve months, primarily related to third
party vendors payables.  In an effort to support and maintain our
financial position and operations, the Company focused on
increasing its revenue through its online platform and trimming its
overhead costs.  As aforementioned, since the first quarter of
2022, our average monthly online sales have increased.  We continue
to exert efforts to increase our sales volume and reduce
administrative costs.  Simultaneously, our director continues to
support our operation financially.  We believe that such measures
will improve our liquidity in the next twelve months.  If we are
not able to increase revenue or obtain any financing, we may be
unable to continue as a going concern.

"The Company continues to monitor its operations to help refine the
Company's financial liquidity.  The financial liquidity of the
Company has declined to very unhealthy level in this quarter due to
the decline in the balance of cash and cash equivalent.  Options
under consideration in the review process include, but not limited
to, increase of sales on its online business, reduction of overhead
costs, fund advance from the Company's stockholders and directors,
or financing through issuance of shares.  The Company continues to
focus on increasing its revenue through its online platform and
slimming its administrative costs.  For example, we reduced the
compensation and benefits of our executives, decreased office
supplies expense and trimmed executive travel expenses.
Additionally, our director will provide financing to meet our
working capital requirements.

"In order to continue as a going concern for the next 12 months,
the Company continues to focus on increasing its revenue through
the sale of health care products on its online platform, King Eagle
Mall, streamlining its overhead costs or obtaining a financing from
its stockholders or directors.  However, the Company cannot provide
any assurance that it will be able to increase revenue, that it
will be able to successfully implement its business plan, or that
financing that will be available to it on commercially acceptable
terms, if at all."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001502557/000149315222023045/form10-q.htm

                          About Kun Peng

Kun Peng International Ltd. is engaged in the sale of health care
products and services through its online platform.  KPIL is a
Nevada holding company with operations in the People's Republic of
China conducted by various subsidiaries and through contractual
agreements with a variable interest entity, King Eagle (Tianjin)
Technology Co., Ltd.

Kun Peng reported a net loss of $1.77 million for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2021, compared to a net loss of $208,771 for the year
ended Sept. 30, 2020.

Malaysia-based J&S Associate, the Company's auditor since 2021,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated  Jan.
13, 2022, citing that the Company has suffered recurring losses
from operations and has incurred an accumulated deficit of
$1,821,105 and a working capital deficit of $2,318,784 as at Sept.
30, 2021. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.


SEAZEN COMPANIES: S&P Lowers ICR to 'BB', Outlook Negative
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings, on Aug. 22, 2022, lowered its long-term issuer
credit ratings on Seazen Group Ltd. (Seazen) and its subsidiary
Seazen Holdings to 'BB' from 'BB+'. At the same time, S&P lowered
its long-term issue rating on Seazen Holdings' outstanding senior
unsecured notes to 'BB-' from 'BB'.

The negative outlook on Seazen reflects the risk that the sales and
liquidity sources of the China-based property holding company may
continue to decline, which would result in worsening leverage and
liquidity buffer.

S&P said, "We lowered the ratings because Seazen's sales could
significantly decline due to its market positioning and weak
homebuyer sentiment. We expect the company's sales to decline by
33%-38% to Chinese renminbi (RMB) 145 billion-RMB156 billion in
2022."

Seazen's contracted sales dropped by about 44% in the first seven
months of 2022 over the same period in 2021. Despite month-on-month
sales growth since May with a relaxation of COVID restrictions,
poor homebuyer sentiment amid a mortgage boycott dampened property
sales in July. Given that over 50%-60% of Seazen's saleable
resources are located in lower-tier cities where demand is
generally weaker, the company's sales recovery could be slow.

Seazen's integrated property development model could face hiccups.
The company has leveraged its Wuyue Plaza brand to acquire low-cost
land, particularly in lower-tier cities. Historically, Seazen has
relied on cash inflow from property sales to fund its mall
construction. Given weaker demand in lower-tier cities, such an
operating model appears increasingly difficult. S&P also believes
the company could further deplete its already-thin landbank. In its
estimation, Seazen's land reserves can support one and a half to
two years of development.

Seazen's liquidity buffer could narrow further with less cash
generated from property sales while it pays off debt with internal
resources. S&P estimates the group likely had about RMB8 billion
accessible cash at the holding companies as of the end of the first
quarter of 2022, down from about RMB12 billion as of end-2021.

Seazen will have US$200 million and RMB2.8 billion of domestic and
offshore financing maturing or puttable before the end of 2022.
Although the company has managed to obtain new financing of US$100
million and RMB1 billion from capital markets in 2022, the amount
is no comparison to over RMB10 billion equivalent of capital-market
financing that it had repaid in the first eight months of 2022. S&P
also believes further access to new capital-market financing could
be subject to uncertainties.

Seazen's portfolio of commercial properties may continue to provide
funding support. The company has a track record of obtaining
working capital loans from its Wuyue Plaza malls. For the first
seven months of 2022, S&P estimates it obtained financing of nearly
RMB6 billion from about 20 of its malls. It has about 60
unencumbered malls that could be further pledged for financing,
although most could still be in the ramp-up stage.

The negative outlook on Seazen reflects the risk that the company's
sales and liquidity sources may decline more than S&P expects over
the next 12 months. Along with margin compression, that may cause
its debt-to-EBITDA ratio to weaken more than its base case.

Seazen's liquidity buffer may also narrow further. However, S&P
expects the company to have stable rental income and access to
financing support from its commercial properties to mitigate the
risk and to address debt maturities in the rest of 2022 and 2023.
The ratings and outlook on Seazen Holdings will move in tandem with
those on Seazen Group.

S&P said, "We could lower the ratings on Seazen if its revenue
slippage is materially worse than we expect, with sales declining
more than our projection, or if its margin drops well below our
forecast. A debt-to-EBITDA ratio staying above 5.0x over a
sustained period could trigger a downgrade.

"We could also downgrade the company if rental growth from its
investment properties falls short of our expectations such that
rental income, including contracted rental management fees, is
insufficient to cover interest expense. In that case, our tolerance
for weaker sales and lower margins would narrow. The company's
ratio of debt to EBITDA staying higher than 4.5x over a sustained
period would point to such a deterioration."

A downgrade is also possible if Seazen's liquidity significantly
weakens from the current level with continuous debt repayment using
its own cash, without further new financings such as through
pledges of existing malls over the next six to 12 months.

S&P may revise the outlook back to stable if Seazen's sales and
margins are better than it forecasts, such that the company
maintains leverage below 5.0x, while growth in rental income is
stable. At the same time, its liquidity remains at an adequate
level, through satisfactory cash inflow from contracted sales and
stable rental income, as well as new financing through pledges of
existing malls.

ESG credit indicators: E-3, S-2, G-3




=========
I N D I A
=========

10I COMMERCE: Files for Bankruptcy Protection
---------------------------------------------
VCCircle.com reports that Bengaluru, India-based ShopX has decided
to 'wind down its operations' and has filed an application for
insolvency and bankruptcy under Section 10 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy (IBC) code, 2016, the company said in a Ministry of
Corporate (MCA) filing.

VCCircle.com relates that the Nandan Nilekani-backed startup said
that it defaulted on repayment of interest on loans due to the
insufficiency of funds. The company said it took multiple loans
from its investors including Nilekani and its Singapore-based
backer Fung Investment, without sharing details about the figures.


The e-commerce enablement platform added in the regulatory filing
that it has considerably reduced its employees' strength to ensure
that "there is no other recurring payment obligation of the
company," VCCircle.com relays.

Founded in 2014 by Amit Sharma and Apoorva Jois, ShopX is operated
by 10i Commerce Services Pvt. Ltd. The company started as a
platform that enabled local kirana stores and small retailers to
manage transactions on a single platform.

However, last year, it made changes to its operations to become an
e-commerce enabler, pitting against a slew of startups in the
space, the report says. The company also experimented with an app
promising discount on the purchase of goods from nearby
partner-retail stores, marking a foray into the consumer tech
space.

ShopX had last secured funds in April 2020. To date, the startup
has raised more than $50 million in multiple funding rounds.  

In the filing, the company said "it was formed with the object to
do business of operating an e-commerce platform for the sale of
various products and services by third-party suppliers to
wholesalers and retailers," VCCircle.com relas.

"Since the business model of the Company has not succeeded, it has
not been able to generate enough cash flow from operations or raise
new capital and is therefore unable to meet its various payment
obligations and has ceased to be a going concern," it added.


ANANDALOK HOSPITAL: ICRA Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the long-term rating of Anandalok Hospital in the
'Issuer Not Cooperating' category. The rating is denoted as
[ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING".

                    Amount
   Facilities     (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------     -----------    -------
   Long-term–         5.10       [ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING;
   Fund based                    Rating Continues to remain under
   Term Loan                     'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

   Long-term–         7.00       [ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING;
   Fund based                    Rating Continues to remain under
   Cash Credit                   'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

   Long Term-         0.40       [ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Non-Fund                      Rating continues to remain under
   Based-Others                  'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance. Further, ICRA has been sending repeated
reminders to the entity for payment of surveillance fee that became
due but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the entity's management
has remained non-cooperative. The current rating action has been
taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/limited information on the
issuers' performance. Accordingly, the lenders, investors and other
market participants are advised to exercise appropriate caution
while using this rating as the rating may not adequately reflect
the credit risk profile of the entity. The rating action has been
taken in accordance with ICRA's policy in respect of
non-cooperation by a rated entity available at www.icra.in.

Established in 1989, Anandalok Hospital is a charitable society
established for offering medical treatment at affordable rates to
the economically weaker sections of the society. It runs six
hospitals, four of them in Kolkata, and one each at Baduria and
Raniganj, with a total capacity of 450 beds and a diagnostic centre
in Kolkata. All the hospitals are multispecialty in nature. The
society also undertakes other charitable activities. It distributes
books to poor students, provides food,clothes and shelter to the
poor people. Mr. Deo Kumar Saraf, a businessman, is the chairman of
the society and has been associated with it since its formation.
Mr. Arun Poddar, Ms. Jyotsna Poddar, Mr. R.P. Salarpuria, Mr. S.K.
Roy, Mr. B.L. Jajodia, Mrs. Jayshree Mohta, Mr. Pawan Kumar Dhoot,
Mr. Ashok Todi, and Mr. Lalit Beriwal, are some of the other
members on the society's managing committee.


BHALKESHWAR SUGARS: CRISIL Keeps D Ratings in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Bhalkeshwar
Sugars Limited (BSL) continue to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------       -----------     -------
   Long Term Loan        18         CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Term Loan             12.5       CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Term Loan             43.5       CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Term Loan             28         CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Term Loan             38         CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Working Capital       24         CRISIL D (Issuer Not
   Facility                         Cooperating)

   Working Capital        6         CRISIL D (Issuer Not
   Facility                         Cooperating)


   Working Capital       12         CRISIL D (Issuer Not
   Facility                         Cooperating)


   Working Capital       16         CRISIL D (Issuer Not
   Facility                         Cooperating)


   Working Capital        2         CRISIL D (Issuer Not
   Facility                         Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with BSL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 10, 2022
and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of BSL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on BSL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
BSL continues to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Incorporated in 2000, Karnataka-based BSL is promoted by Mr Prakash
Khandre. It manufactures sugar and has a cane crushing capacity of
about 2500 tonne per day (TPD) and a 14 megawatt co-generation
power plant. It is undertaking a debt-funded capital expenditure
plan to enhance the sugar crushing capacity up to 4000 TPD and
setting up distillery units with total capacity of 60 kilo litres
per day. Commercial operation of the distillery is expected to
commence from January 2018.


BIYANI SHIKSHAN: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Biyani
Shikshan Samiti (BSS) continue to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                        Amount
   Facilities        (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------        -----------     -------
   Overdraft Facility    11.12       CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                     Cooperating)

  Overdraft Facility      1          CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                     Cooperating)

  Overdraft Facility      0.2        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                     Cooperating)

   Overdraft Facility     0.2        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                     Cooperating)

   Proposed Long Term    37.48       CRISIL D (Issuer Not
   Bank Loan Facility                Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with BSS for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 10, 2022
and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of BSS, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on BSS
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
BSS continues to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Set up in 1997 by Mr. Rajeev Biyani, Dr. Sanjay Biyani, and Dr.
Manish Biyani, BSS was initially a coaching institute. It set up
its first institute, Biyani Girls College, at Jaipur (Rajasthan) in
2003. It currently operates six institutes under the Biyani brand
in two different campuses situated at Vidhyadhar Nagar and Kalwar
in Jaipur. The institutes offer courses in the fields of commerce,
nursing, education, technology, information technology, and
management. BSS has more than 4300 students.


BUSH TEA: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating Category
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Bush Tea
Company Private Limited (BTCPL) continue to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------       -----------     -------
   Cash Credit           7.5        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Cash Credit          20          CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with BTCPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 10, 2022
and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of BTCPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on BTCPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
BTCPL continue to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Bush Tea was acquired by the current promoter, Mr Sanjay Prakash
Bansal, in 2009. Prior to the acquisition, the company exported
conventional tea to the US, the UK, and Gulf countries, but now
mostly trades in conventional tea in the domestic market. It also
trades in a small proportion of organic tea. Bush Tea procures
equal amounts of tea from both auction houses and private players
and blends it at its warehouse. The company sells tea mostly to
players such as Tata Global Beverages Pvt Ltd, Jalpaiguri Tea
Company and local players.


CHEM STAR: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating Category
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the rating on bank facilities of Chem Star
International Private Limited (CIPL) continues to be 'CRISIL D
Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------       -----------     -------
   Cash Credit            5         CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with CIPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 10, 2022
and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of CIPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on CIPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
CIPL continue to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

CIPL, set up in 2011, trades in shrimp. The Nellore (Andhra
Pradesh)-based company has been promoted by Mr Shaik Mahaboob and
his family members.


DEEPA DEVELOPERS: ICRA Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the rating for the bank facilities of Deepa
Developers in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category. The rating is
denoted as "[ICRA]D ; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING".

                    Amount
   Facilities     (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------     -----------    -------
   Long-term–         6.00       [ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING;
   Fund based                    Rating Continues to remain under
   Cash Credit                   'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

   Long-term–         9.00       [ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING;
   Fund based                    Rating Continues to remain under
   Term Loan                    'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance. Further, ICRA has been sending repeated
reminders to the entity for payment of surveillance fee that became
due but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the entity's management
has remained non-cooperative. The current rating action has been
taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/limited information on the
issuers' performance. Accordingly, the lenders, investors and other
market participants are advised to exercise appropriate caution
while using this rating as the rating may not adequately reflect
the credit risk profile of the entity. The rating action has been
taken in accordance with ICRA's policy in respect of
non-cooperation by a rated entity available at www.icra.in.

Promoted by Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Deepa Developers is a partnership
firm with Mrs. Urmila Ramesh and Mrs. Deepa Sampath Bannan as his
co-partners. Initially, Deepa Developers was engaged in development
of residential and commercial complexes in Mangalore region; and
has in the past, developed several properties under its group
companies. However, the firm sold most of its properties and is
presently engaged in managing Hotel Deepa Comforts (the Hotel) in
Mangalore. During 2008-09, Deepa Developers constructed and
developed a commercial complex - "Deepa Plaza" which houses Deepa
Comforts. Apart from the Hotel, Deepa Plaza also houses several
shops which have been completely sold post construction of the
property.


DHARMRAJ ALUMINIUM: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the rating on bank facilities of Dharmraj
Aluminium Industries Private Limited (DAIPL) continues to be
'CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------       -----------     -------
   Cash Credit            20        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with DAIPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 10, 2022
and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of DAIPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on DAIPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
DAIPL continue to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

DAIPL, incorporated in 2011, manufactures aluminium ingots. The
company is currently promoted and managed by Mr. Vijay C Gujar and
Mr. Bharat B Gujar. DAIPL has a manufacturing facility in
Aurangabad (Maharashtra) with a capacity of 18,000 tonne per
annum.


FSD BUILDING: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of FSD Building
Materials Private Limited (FSD) continue to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                         Amount
   Facilities         (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------        -----------      -------
   Overdraft Facility      30         CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                      Cooperating)

   Proposed Long Term       5         CRISIL D (Issuer Not
   Bank Loan Facility                 Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with FSD for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 24, 2022
and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of FSD, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on FSD
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
FSD continues to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

FSD, incorporated in 2010, is promoted by Mr Yahya Farouk Darvesh,
Ms Hanifa Farouk Darvesh, and Mr Zakaria Farouk Darvesh based in
Mumbai. The family has been engaged in the timber industry for over
100 years. The company trades in timber, medium-density fibreboard,
and wood-based chemicals, and is managed by Ms Hanifa Farouk
Darvesh and Mr Zakaria Farouk Darvesh.


FUTURE RETAIL: Lenders Submit Loan Claims of US$2.64 Billion
------------------------------------------------------------
Reuters reports that lenders to India's Future Retail Ltd have
submitted loan claims of about 210.58 billion Indian rupees
(US$2.64 billion) under the ongoing insolvency process, according
to a document released on the company's website on Aug. 23.

A Mumbai court earlier this year ordered bankruptcy proceedings
against Future Retail after it defaulted on loans with over 30
entities and its secured lenders rejected a $3.4 billion sale of
its retail assets to market leader Reliance Industries

According to Reuters, the latest claims were filed by 33 banks
including Bank of New York Mellon, State Bank of India, HDFC Bank
and Barclays Bank PLC.

The loan claims by lenders could change depending on lenders'
calculations as the bankruptcy case proceeds, the report notes.

Future Group operates multi-branded retail outlets. The company's
retail chains include department stores, outlet stores, sportswear,
home improvement and consumer durables, supermarket, and
convenience stores as well as food parks.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter-Asia Pacific in late
July 2022, an Indian court agreed to send Future Retail Ltd. into
bankruptcy, allowing the creditors to find a new owner for the
beleaguered retailer.  According to Bloomberg News, the National
Company Law Tribunal on July 20 gave its verdict on a petition by
Bank of India to start the bankruptcy-resolution process for the
cash-strapped retailer. It dismissed allegations from the local
unit of Amazon.com Inc. that Future Retail's lenders were colluding
with its founders to push the firm into insolvency. The court also
appointed an administrator to take over the management at Future
Retail.


KRISHNAAM MOBILE: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Krishnaam
Mobile and accessories Private Limited (KMAPL) continue to be
'CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------       -----------     -------
   Cash Credit           6.7        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Proposed Long Term    0.9        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
   Bank Loan Facility               Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with KMAPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 10, 2022
and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of KMAPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on KMAPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
KMAPL continue to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Incorporated in 2006, KMAPL trades in mobile accessories. It is
promoted by Mr. Amit Singhania and is based in Delhi.


LOK ENTERPRISES: ICRA Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the long term and short term ratings of Lok
Enterprises in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category. The rating is
denoted as "[ICRA]D/ [ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING".

                     Amount
   Facilities     (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------     -----------    -------
   Short-term        10.00       [ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Non-fund based                Continues to remain under the
   Others                        'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

   Long Term        (1.00)       [ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Interchangeable               Rating Continues to remain under
                                 issuer not cooperating category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance. Further, ICRA has been sending repeated
reminders to the entity for payment of surveillance fee that became
due but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the entity's management
has remained non-cooperative. The current rating action has been
taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/limited information on the
issuers' performance. Accordingly, the lenders, investors and other
market participants are advised to exercise appropriate caution
while using this rating as the rating may not adequately reflect
the credit risk profile of the entity. The rating action has been
taken in accordance with ICRA's policy in respect of
non-cooperation by a rated entity available at www.icra.in.

Established in 2002 as a partnership firm, LE is a trading house
engaged in trading of various forms of pulses and beans into the
domestic market. The firm has its registered office in Mumbai and a
warehouse facility located in Vashi, Navi Mumbai. The firm
undertakes import of pulses and beans and supplies it into domestic
markets. The agricultural products comprise of raw pulses such as
Masoor (split red lentils), Moong (split yellow lentil), Chana
(chickpeas), Black eye bean, Toor Whole, Pinto bean etc. The traded
goods are largely procured directly from international market.
About 75% of the materials are sourced from Africa, Canada, USA,
Argentina, Burma and Russia, while the remaining 25% are procured
domestically.


MA CHANDI: CRISIL Keeps D Ratings in Not Cooperating Category
-------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Ma Chandi
Durga Cement Limited (MCDCL) continue to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D
Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------       -----------     -------
   Cash Credit            5         CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Cash Credit            5.47      CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Long Term Loan        11.26      CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)
  
   Long Term Loan         8.07      CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Overdraft Facility     3.20      CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with MCDCL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 10, 2022
and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of MCDCL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on MCDCL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
MCDCL continue to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Incorporated in 2007, MCDCL is promoted by Mr. Kuldip Kedia. It
manufactures cement and mild steel ingots in Durgapur, West Bengal.
It also trades in iron and steel products such as
thermos-mechanically treated bars, pig iron and slag, and does job
work for firm, Star Cement.


MADHAVA HYTECH: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Madhava
Hytech Infrastructures India Private Limited (MHIPL) continue to be
'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------       -----------     -------
   Bank Guarantee         10        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Cash Credit             4        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with MHIPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 10, 2022
and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of MHIPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on MHIPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
MHIPL continue to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

MHIPL undertakes civil construction work on contract basis for
Railways, and State Road authorities. The company is promoted by
Mr. Pradeep Kilaru and is based out of Hyderabad.


MSR ENTERPRISES: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of MSR
Enterprises (MSR) continue to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------       -----------     -------
   Bank Guarantee         8         CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Cash Credit            2.9       CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with MSR for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 10, 2022
and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of MSR, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on MSR
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
MSR continues to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Established in 1995, MSR Enterprises (MSR) is engaged in laying of
distribution lines, erection of electrical substations and
transformers, and refurbishment of old distribution lines. MSR
majorly caters to all the four zonal power distribution companies
of Andhra Pradesh and derives its entire from them. The firm is
promoted by Mr. M Srinivasa Rao, a mechanical engineering graduate
who manages the operations of the firm.


NHS INDUSTRIES: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of NHS
Industries (NHS) continue to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                         Amount
   Facilities         (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------         -----------     -------
   Overdraft Facility      2.5        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                      Cooperating)

   Term Loan               8.4        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                      Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with NHS for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 10, 2022
and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of NHS, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on NHS
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
NHS continues to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

NHS, based in Bengaluru, was established in November 2016 as a
proprietorship firm by Mr Bhargava Reddy. The firm manufactures
HDPE/PP (high-density polyethylene/polypropylene) woven sacks.


OMEGA PREMISES: CRISIL Reaffirms B Rating on INR9.39cr Disc. Loan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings has reaffirmed its 'CRISIL B/Stable' rating on the
long-term bank facilities of Omega Premises Pvt Ltd (OPPL).

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------       -----------     -------
   Lease Rental
   Discounting Loan      4.87       CRISIL B/Stable (Reaffirmed)

   Lease Rental
   Discounting Loan      9.39       CRISIL B/Stable (Reaffirmed)

   Long Term Loan        4.91       CRISIL B/Stable (Reaffirmed)

   Long Term Loan        2.69       CRISIL B/Stable (Reaffirmed)

   Long Term Loan        9.69       CRISIL B/Stable (Reaffirmed)

   Proposed Long Term
   Bank Loan Facility   18.45       CRISIL B/Stable (Reaffirmed)

The rating continues to reflect modest debt service coverage ratio
(DSCR), exposure to risks and cyclicality inherent in the domestic
real estate industry, susceptibility to timely execution of
projects and flow of customer advances and other risks pertaining
to leasing of vacant area or saleability, and timely renewal of the
lease contracts. These weaknesses are partially offset by the
extensive experience of the promoter in the real estate industry,
favorable location and diverse client base.

Key rating drivers & detailed description

Weaknesses:

* Modest DSCR: Average DSCR was modest at 1.09 times for the tenure
of the loans, with minimum DSCR at 0.5 time. The DSCR is further
exposed to risk of escalation of rates for future renewal and lease
rate of vacant property. Non-renewable of contracts could also
affect the ratio. Any significant increase in interest rates may
impact DSCR and will remain a rating sensitivity factor.

* Susceptibility to timely execution of projects, and flow of
customer advances: The company has one ongoing project that is
halfway with its construction. With 57% of bookings done, the
project remains exposed to risks related to completion and demand.
Any delay in bookings or project execution will impact
debt-repayment ability.

* Exposure to risks and cyclicality inherent in the domestic real
estate segment: The industry is highly fragmented with many
regional players and is also exposed to economic cycles. CRISIL
Ratings believe that the company will remain exposed to risk
related to cyclicality in the Indian real estate business.

* Susceptibility to risk pertaining to leasing of vacant area and
timely renewal of lease contract: The company is exposed to risk
pertaining to leasing or sale of vacant area, it currently has a
low occupancy of around 50%. Timely leasing of the vacant space at
sustainable rates and to clients with sound credit risk profiles
will be crucial in maintaining adequate liquidity. Further, timely
renewal of agreements with existing tenants at similar or higher
rates will remain a key monitorable over the medium term.

Strengths:

* Extensive experience of the promoter in the real estate segment:
The promoter has a strong track record of completing many
residential and commercial projects over the past decade in
Maharashtra. This would continue to benefit business risk profile
over the medium term.

* Favorable location and diverse clientele: The properties are
located in the prime areas of Pune. Also, OPPL benefits from long
tenured contracts with few clients such as Ramchandra Institute of
Management and BDO India LLP. Moreover, clientele is diversified
and includes Atlas Copco Tools and Assembly Systems Limited, HDFC
Bank, Big Basket, and WeShine Tech. Locational advantage should
continue to support the business over the medium term.

Liquidity: Stretched

The DSCR is average. Rentals are deposited in escrow account
maintained with the bank and any surplus after debt servicing can
be used by the company at its discretion. Existence of the escrow
mechanism will enable the firm to service debt on time.

Outlook: Stable

OPPL should continue to benefit from the extensive experience of
its promoter and long-term lease contracts with counterparties.

Rating sensitivity factors

Upward factors

* Sustained improvement in cash DSCR to above 1.3 times, with
higher cash flows or reduced debt
* Faster-than-expected completion of projects and higher bookings

Downward factors

* Weakening of average cash DSCR below 1 time due to unanticipated
downward revision in rental rates, increase in interest rates, or
delay in sale of inventory
* Unexpected delays in lease payments leading to cash flow
mismatches,

OPPL is a part of the Suhas Mantri group that was set up in the
early 1990s. Promoted by Mr Suhas Mantri, the company undertakes
commercial and residential real estate projects in Pune. It
generates revenue through leasing out properties for commercial
purposes while also through sale of residential and commercial real
estate project. It currently has an ongoing commercial project,
Mantri Mystica.


PRASAD SUGAR: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Prasad Sugar
and Allied Agro Products Limited (PSAAPL) continue to be 'CRISIL D
Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------       -----------     -------
   Cash Credit           3.67       CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Long Term Loan       27.50       CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Pledge Loan         122.22       CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Term Loan            26.61       CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with PSAAPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 10, 2022
and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of PSAAPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on
PSAAPL is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'.
Based on the last available information, the ratings on bank
facilities of PSAAPL continue to be 'CRISIL D Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

PSAAAPL, incorporated in 2007, is owned and managed by Mr
Shusilkumar Deshmukh and Mr Prasad Tanpure, and their family
members. The company manufactures sugar at its plant in Rahuri
Taluka in the Ahmednagar district of Maharashtra, with an installed
capacity of 4,000 tonne crushed per day.  It is currently setting
up a molasses-based ethanol plant.


PRAVEEN ELECTRICAL: CRISIL Keeps D Ratings in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of Praveen
Electrical Works (PEW) continue to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer Not
Cooperating'.

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------       -----------     -------
   Bank Guarantee         11        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Overdraft Facility      6        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Proposed Long Term      3        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
   Bank Loan Facility               Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with PEW for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 10, 2022
and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of PEW, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on PEW
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
PEW continue to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

PEW was set up in 1994 as a sole proprietorship firm by Mr Prakash
C Angadi. The firm undertakes turnkey projects for laying
electrical cables and poles, and electrification projects. It has a
facility in Karnataka.


S. RASIKLAL: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
-----------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of S. Rasiklal
and Co. continue to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------       -----------     -------
   Adhoc Limit           1          CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Foreign Exchange      0.60       CRISIL D (Issuer Not
   Forward                          Cooperating)

   Packing Credit        3.15       CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Packing Credit        1.5        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Post Shipment        10.5        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
   Credit                           Cooperating)

   Post Shipment         5.25       CRISIL D (Issuer Not
   Credit                           Cooperating)

   Proposed Long Term   12.0        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
   Bank Loan Facility               Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with S. Rasiklal
for obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 10,
2022 and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of S. Rasiklal, which restricts
CRISIL Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the
entity's credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action
on S. Rasiklal is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy
Risk'. Based on the last available information, the ratings on bank
facilities of S. Rasiklal continues to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer
Not Cooperating'.

Set up in 1969 as a proprietorship concern by Mr. Rasiklal Shah, S.
Rasiklal was reconstituted as a partnership firm in 1972. The firm
is currently managed by Mr. Pravin Shah and his family. The firm
manufactures and exports cut and polished diamonds. It is also
engaged in the trading of polished diamonds.


SAEL RG1: Fitch Withdraws BB(EXP) Rating on New USD Notes
---------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has withdrawn the 'BB(EXP)' expected rating with a
Stable Outlook assigned to SAEL RG1's proposed US dollar senior
secured notes.

The rating on the proposed senior secured notes was initially
assigned on April 4, 2022.

Fitch is withdrawing the expected rating as it is no longer
expected to convert to a final rating in the near future. The
company may resume the plan for an issuance once market conditions
become conducive.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Key rating drivers do not apply as the rating has been withdrawn.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

Rating sensitivities do not apply as the rating has been
withdrawn.

RATING ACTIONS

ENTITY/DEBT      RATING                     PRIOR
-----------      ------                     --------   
SAEL RG1

  SAEL RG1/      LT   WD     Withdrawn      BB(EXP)
  senior secured/
  1 LT


SARIN'S: CRISIL Reaffirms B+ Rating on INR0.75cr Demand Loan
------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings has reaffirmed its 'CRISIL B+/Stable/CRISIL A4'
ratings on the bank facilities of Sarin's.

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------       -----------     -------
   Bank Guarantee        4          CRISIL A4 (Reaffirmed)

   Cash Credit           2.75       CRISIL B+/Stable (Reaffirmed)

   Working Capital
   Demand Loan           0.75       CRISIL B+/Stable (Reaffirmed)

The ratings continue to reflect the modest scale of operations and
large working capital requirement of the firm. These weaknesses are
partially offset by the extensive experience of the proprietor in
the civil construction industry.

Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description

Weaknesses:

* Working capital-intensive operations: Gross current assets were
around 200 days as of March 31, 2022 (246 days as on March 31,
2021), on account of stretched receivables and current assets in
the form of security deposits for contracts to be executed. Hence,
working capital requirement will remain large over the medium
term.

* Modest scale of operations and limited geographical reach:
Revenue remained subdued at INR9.68 crore in fiscal 2022 (Rs 9.32
crore in fiscal 2021) because operations are restricted to the
Northeast (mainly Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh). Also, income
tends to fluctuate due to the geo-political conditions in the
area.

Strength:

* Extensive experience of the proprietor: The two-decade-long
presence of the proprietor in the civil construction business and
his active involvement in daily operations have enabled the firm to
secure orders from Assam Rifles and Military Engineer Services

Liquidity: Stretched

Expected annual cash accrual of INR0.42 crore will tightly match
yearly debt obligation of INR0.35 crore, over the medium term. Bank
limit utilization averaged around 30% over the 12 months through
May 2022.

Outlook Stable

Sarin's will continue to benefit from the extensive experience of
its proprietor in the civil construction businesss.

Rating Sensitivity factors

Upward factors:

* Sustained growth in topline by over 20%, leading to cash accrual
above INR1.00 crore
* Better working capital management
* Improvement in financial risk profile

Downward factors:

* Decline in net cash accrual below INR0.4 crore over the medium
term
* Further stretch in working capital cycle
* Weakening of financial risk profile

Sarin's was formed as a proprietary concern of Mr Deepak Sarin in
1984. The Shillong-based firm constructs commercial and residential
buildings for the Assam Rifles and Military Engineer Services in
the Northeast.


SETCO AUTO: ICRA Hikes Rating on INR215cr NCD from D
----------------------------------------------------
ICRA has revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of Setco
Auto Systems Private Limited (SASPL), as:

                     Amount
   Facilities     (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------     -----------    -------
   Non-convertible
   Debenture         215.00      [ICRA]B-(Stable); upgraded from
                                 [ICRA]D

   Non-convertible
   Debenture         350.00      [ICRA]B-(Stable); assigned

Rationale

The rating upgrade for SASPL considers its consistent track record
of timely servicing of debt obligations, post restructuring and
business transfer in September 2021. At SAL (parent company)
standalone level, as a part of restructuring, all external debt has
been repaid and the company only has unsecured loans from SASPL.
The upgrade also follows the change in methodology from a
consolidated to standalone view, going forward, as the entry of new
investors lead to the dilution in 100% ownership by SAL earlier.
Also, with restriction in upstreaming of funds as a part of loan
agreement with the new investors, the fungibility of funds is
constrained, which was available earlier, thereby moving to a
standalone view, going forward.

Previously, for arriving at the ratings of SASPL, ICRA had taken a
consolidated view of Setco Automotive Limited (SAL) and its
subsidiaries, given the close business, financial and managerial
linkages among the entities. However, in FY2022, SAL had undergone
a financial restructuring, which was utilised to repay dues to all
existing lenders including working capital lenders. A portion of
the funds have also been utilised to meet overdue statutory
liabilities and stretched creditors. Simultaneously, with a view to
unlock the value, SAL had executed a business transfer agreement on
August 31, 2021, whereby SAL had transferred its clutch
manufacturing business to SASPL, its step-down subsidiary.

Consequently, SASPL raised debt funding through issuance of listed
non-convertible debentures from IRF, which was primarily used to
repay the stretched creditors, support Lava Cast Private Limited
(LCPL, 10.31% held by SASPL), streamline the business, and
re-energise the company through liquidity support. Simultaneously,
SASPL also raised equity funding against issuance of equity shares
and certain convertible instruments which resulted in subscription
of 35% shareholding of SASPL by the India Resurgence Fund schemes,
managed by India Resurgence Asset Management Business Private
Limited. ICRA notes that there is a constraining factor to upstream
the funds to the parent entity (SAL), unless approved by the new
investors. Hence, ICRA now takes a standalone approach for SASPL.
ICRA also notes that the group profile continues to be weak given
continuing delays in debt servicing in LCPL, due to
underutilisation of capacity. SASPL has provided support to LCPL
for maintenance capex and business stabilisation through funds from
Non-convertible Debentures (NCD), equity infusion in FY2022 and
partly in the current fiscal too. However, at present, no further
support will be extended to LCPL or upstreaming of funds to SAL or
any other Group entity, and will be a key monitorable, going
forward. The rating also factors in SASPL's weak financial profile
on account of high losses and modest debt coverage indicators. The
rating is also constrained by the company's significant debt,
coupled with accumulative interest with redemption falling in
FY2026. The company's ability to timely redeem the bonds through a
mix of refinancing, equity infusion or generation of internal
accruals, will remain a key monitorable for its credit profile.

The rating, however, notes the extensive experience of the
promoters, established operational track record and strong
relationships with original equipment manufacturers (OEM) in the
M&HCV clutch manufacturing business. The rating also considers the
improvement in SASPL's operating profile, post infusion of funds
through NCDs, which lead to streamlining of the business.

The Stable outlook reflects ICRA's expectation that SASPL will
continue to benefit from its established operational track record,
extensive experience of the promoters and its ability to scale-up
the business in a profitable manner.

Key rating drivers and their description

Credit strengths

* Extensive experience of promoters' and established operational
track record of Group in auto component industry: SAL had executed
a business transfer agreement on August 31, 2021, whereby SAL had
transferred its clutch manufacturing business to SASPL, its
step-down subsidiary. Before the restructuring, SAL was managed by
Mr. Harish Sheth. At present, SASPL is managed by Mr. Harish Sheth,
who has an experience of over 35 years in the auto component
industry. The company manufactures clutches primarily for MHCVs and
the Group has an established operational track record of nearly 35
years. The company's revenues are distributed across three key
segments, original equipment manufacturers (OEM), original
equipment suppliers (OES) and independent aftermarket (IAM). It
forayed into manufacturing clutches for the farm tractor segment in
FY2021.

* Strong relationships with OEMs along with repeat business from
major OEMs: The company has developed an established customer base
with repeat orders. It has an established brand presence in the
automotive market with reputed M&HCV OEMs in India. Improvement in
operating profile witnessed post infusion of funds through NCDs,
leading to streamlining of business – SAL underwent a financial
restructuring to unlock value of the company's clutch manufacturing
business and streamline the business. In September 2021, the
company had issued unlisted non-convertible debentures worth INR350
crore to the India Resurgence Fund (IRF) schemes, managed by India
Resurgence Asset Management Business Private Limited. The funds
have been utilised to repay dues to all existing lenders including
working capital lenders. A portion of the funds have also been
utilised to meet overdue statutory liabilities and pressing
creditors. Simultaneously, with a view to unlock the value, the
company had executed a business transfer agreement on August 31,
2021, whereby SAL has transferred its clutch manufacturing business
to SASPL. Consequently, SASPL raised debt funding through issuance
of listed non-convertible debentures for INR215 crore from IRF.
Simultaneously, SASPL also raised equity funding of INR50.00 crore
against issuance of equity shares and certain convertible
instruments, which resulted in subscription of 35% shareholding of
SASPL by the India Resurgence Fund schemes. The funds were utilised
to energise the business. This resulted in debottlenecking the
business to an extent. The company reported an operating income of
INR262 crore in FY2022 (September 7, 2021 to March 31, 2022), with
operating margins of 7.9% and has been consistent in repaying all
debt obligations on time post the restructure.

Credit challenges

* Weak financial profile characterised by net losses and modest
debt coverage indicators: SASPL's financial profile remained weak
on the back of net losses as on March 31, 2022. It reported losses
of INR173.0 crore owing to lower top-line, high interest expenses
and significant exceptional losses. The company reported revenues
of INR262 crore in FY2022 (September 7, 2021 to March 31, 2022) and
INR140.4 crore in Q1 FY2023, with operating margins of 7.9% and
13.4%, respectively. The company's debt coverage indicators
remained weak in FY2022 on account of high debt levels.

* Significant debt, coupled with accumulative interest with
redemption falling in FY2026: SASPL has a significant debt of
INR565.0 crore in FY2026, along with the accrued interest till
FY2026. The company is required to mandatorily pay 5% coupon
interest per annum on NCD with an option to repay the accrued
interests from time to time, which however, will depend on the
company's ability to generate healthy cash flows through
operations. The ability to successfully manage timely repayment of
NCD and accrued interest generated till FY2026, through either
refinancing or in-house generation of cash flows or any equity
support, remains critical for the credit profile and will remain a
key monitorable.

* Stressed financial profile of associate entity Lava Cast Pvt.
Ltd, which continues to be under default: LCPL, an associate of
SASPL with a 10.31% shareholding, started commercial production
from April 2016, wherein it has an installed casting capacity of
30,000 MTPA. LCPL has been reporting losses for the past four years
owing to internal challenges such as higher rejections and lower
yields. The downturn in the OEM production in FY2020 and FY2021
further impacted the company's utilisation levels. LCPL could not
service the debt obligation in FY2020 due to high losses and
internal challenges. The company underwent debt restructuring,
which was implemented in FY2021, providing a much-needed liquidity
buffer to LCPL through an elongated repayment period, along with
lower interest costs. Due to the continuation of internal
challenges, the company was unable to service the debt obligation
in FY2022. SASPL had provided support to LCPL during FY2022 from
the funds received from NCD and equity for maintenance capex and
for stabilisation of the business. However, no further support to
LCPL, SAL or any other Group entity from SASPL, is expected, going
forward, and will remain a rating monitorable.

* High exposure to cyclicality in auto Industry: SASPL primarily
caters to the automobile industry and manufactures clutches used in
MHCVs. Thus, it remains exposed to the cyclicality in the auto
industry, evident from the volatility in the top-line over the past
fiscals. However, supplies to OEM's constitutes approximately 40%
of topline, balance 60% is through replacement market.

Liquidity position: Stretched

The company's liquidity profile remains stretched, with minimal
liquidity buffer in the form of undrawn working capital, reflected
in the more than 97% average monthly utilisation of the fund-based
working capital limits during the nine-month period that ended on
June 30, 2022. Moreover, the company has significant debt with
accumulated interest in FY2026. The company's ability to
successfully manage timely redemption through either refinancing or
in-house generation of cash flows or any equity support, remains a
monitorable.

Rating sensitivities

Positive factors – ICRA could upgrade SASPL's rating if there is
a sustained improvement in its sales turnover and profitability
along with liquidity, which strengthens the entity's overall
financial profile.

Negative factors – A sharp decline in revenues and profitability,
on a sustained basis, or any stretch in the working capital which
weakens SASPL's liquidity and financial risk profiles, may trigger
a rating downgrade. Any support extended to its parent entity or
any other entity in the Group which impacts the liquidity profile
of SASPL will also be a negative rating trigger

Established in 1982 in collaboration with Gujarat Industrial
Development Corporation (GIDC), Gujarat Setco Automotive Limited
(GSAL) was a manufacturer of clutches for original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs). Around 2000, GIDC stepped out of GSAL, and it
was renamed as Setco Automotive Limited (SAL). In September 2021,
SAL's clutch business was transferred to its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Setco Auto Systems Private Limited on a slump sale
basis. SASPL is promoted by the Sheth family and manufactures
clutches primarily for MHCVs. The company sells clutches under its
own brand name – 'LIPE'. SASPL is managed by Mr. Harish Sheth,
who has an experience of over 35 years in the auto component
business. The company has its own manufacturing unit in Gujarat and
another assembly unit in Uttarakhand. In addition to OEMs, the
company caters to the original equipment suppliers (OES) and
independent aftermarket (IAM). In FY2021, the company forayed into
manufacturing clutches for the farm segment (tractors).


SR CYLINDERS: CRISIL Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
------------------------------------------------------------
CRISIL Ratings said the ratings on bank facilities of SR Cylinders
Private Limited (SRCPL) continue to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer
Not Cooperating'.

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR Crore)     Ratings
   ----------       -----------     -------
   Bank Guarantee        0.5        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)
  
   Cash Credit           3          CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Letter of Credit      1          CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

   Term Loan             5.5        CRISIL D (Issuer Not
                                    Cooperating)

CRISIL Ratings has been consistently following up with SRCPL for
obtaining information through letters and emails dated May 10, 2022
and July 11, 2022 among others, apart from telephonic
communication. However, the issuer has remained non cooperative.

'The investors, lenders and all other market participants should
exercise due caution with reference to the rating assigned/reviewed
with the suffix 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING' as the rating is arrived
at without any management interaction and is based on best
available or limited or dated information on the company. Such non
co-operation by a rated entity may be a result of deterioration in
its credit risk profile. These ratings with 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' suffix lack a forward-looking component.'

Detailed Rationale

Despite repeated attempts to engage with the management, CRISIL
Ratings failed to receive any information on either the financial
performance or strategic intent of SRCPL, which restricts CRISIL
Ratings' ability to take a forward-looking view on the entity's
credit quality. CRISIL Ratings believes that rating action on SRCPL
is consistent with 'Assessing Information Adequacy Risk'. Based on
the last available information, the ratings on bank facilities of
SRCPL continue to be 'CRISIL D/CRISIL D Issuer Not Cooperating'.

Incorporated in 2015 in Hyderabad and promoted by Mr. Shiva
Shankara Reddy, SRCPL manufactures domestic liquefied petroleum gas
(LPG) cylinders, in sizes ranging from 2 47.50 kilograms. It also
offers services like such as hot/cold repair of cylinders.


TRISTAR INTERCONTINENTAL: ICRA Keeps D Ratings in Not Cooperating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the long-term and short-term ratings of Tristar
Intercontinental Pvt Ltd in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category.
The rating is denoted as [ICRA]D/ [ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING".

                    Amount
   Facilities     (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------     -----------    -------
   Long-term–         4.00       [ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING;
   Fund based                    Rating Continues to remain under
   Cash Credit                   'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

   Short-term        12.00       [ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Non-fund based                Continues to remain under the
   Others                        'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

   Long-term/         9.00       [ICRA]D/[ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT
   Short Term                    COOPERATING; Rating Continues to
   Unallocated                   remain under 'Issuer Not
                                 Cooperating' Category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance. Further, ICRA has been sending repeated
reminders to the entity for payment of surveillance fee that became
due but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the entity's management
has remained non-cooperative. The current rating action has been
taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/limited information on the
issuers' performance. Accordingly, the lenders, investors and other
market participants are advised to exercise appropriate caution
while using this rating as the rating may not adequately reflect
the credit risk profile of the entity. The rating action has been
taken in accordance with ICRA's policy in respect of
non-cooperation by a rated entity available at www.icra.in.

Established in 1985, and promoted by Mr. Pawan Aggarwal, Tristar
Intercontinental Private Limited (TIPL), erstwhile known as Tristar
Iron and Steel Company Private Limited, was mainly involved in the
business of dealing in iron and steel products. However, the
commercial operations of the company commenced from 1995, which
included trading in woollen products and at present TIPL is mainly
involved in supplying scoured wool and yarn in the domestic and
international markets. The company has its head office in
Jogeshwari, Mumbai.



=========
J A P A N
=========

MITSUBISHI HEAVY: Supreme Court Yet to Rule on Liquidating Assets
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Korea Times reports that the Supreme Court of Korea delayed
making a decision on liquidating Mitsubishi Heavy Industries'
assets to compensate victims who were forced to labor for the
company during Japan's 1910-1945 colonial occupation of Korea.

According to the report, the decision was widely expected to mark a
watershed moment in Seoul-Tokyo relations, as Japan sees the
liquidation as a "red line" and has warned Korea that it would
regret crossing it. As the top court deliberates on the thorny
issue, it appears that the Yoon Suk-yeol government was also
afforded time to explore ideas that will improve bilateral
relations without further damage to the victims, the report says.

The Korea Times relates that the top court is deliberating an
appeal by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries against a local court's 2021
order to liquidate the company's assets to compensate the victims.
However, the Supreme Court did not announce whether it will dismiss
the appeal as of 5:00 p.m. Aug. 19, meaning it will continue
looking into the case.

The report notes that the legal battle arose after two separate
2018 Supreme Court rulings ordered Japanese companies - Nippon
Steel & Sumitomo Metal (renamed Nippon Steel) and Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries - to compensate forced labor victims. In 2019, Japan
imposed tighter export controls on key industrial items heading to
Seoul in protest against the rulings, which soured bilateral
relations.

The Japanese companies have refused to make compensatory payments,
the report says.

On Sept. 27, last year, Daejeon District Court decided to liquidate
Mitsubishi Heavy's assets ― two patents and two trademark rights
― and the company appealed the ruling. After its first appeal was
dismissed, the company filed another appeal on April 19 this year.

According to the Act on Special Cases Concerning Procedure for
Trial by the Supreme Court, the top court can dismiss an appeal
without stating the reason within four months of its filing, if the
appeal does not have acceptable grounds.

Since Mitsubishi filed the appeal on April 19, the court could have
dismissed the case - and thus liquidate relevant assets - up until
Aug. 19 without stating any detailed reason, according to the
report.

Against this backdrop, Korea's foreign ministry has organized a
consultative body involving government officials, victims, their
legal representatives and experts to explore ideas to solve the
thorny issue before the Supreme Court justices come to a decision.

However, their talks appeared to be derailing, as the victims
remained unhappy with the government's idea of Seoul paying the
compensation and recouping the costs via alternative methods.

The Korea Times says the victims left the consultative body after
discovering that the foreign ministry on July 26 submitted its
letter of opinion to the Supreme Court without informing the
victims. A number of civic groups supporting the victims claimed
that the government in the letter asked the court to postpone
making a final decision given potential diplomatic friction with
Japan, and that this is "largely the same as Mitsubishi's stance."

Although the Supreme Court did not dismiss Mitsubishi's appeal on
Aug. 19, experts said chances are slim that the court will side
with the Japanese company in the future, because the court already
handed down a ruling in 2018 ordering the company to compensate the
victims, the report states.

Rep. Lee Sang-min of the main opposition Democratic Party of Korea
(DPK) said during National Assembly Foreign Affairs and Unification
Committee meeting on Aug. 19 that "the appeal will be dismissed
without further review," adding that the government's idea of a
subrogated compensation would be helpful for the situation, The
Korea Times relays.

During the meeting, Foreign Minister Park Jin said it is "difficult
to anticipate the Supreme Court's decision," but the ministry will
continue listening to stakeholders and making diplomatic efforts to
reach a desirable resolution of the issue.

                       About Mitsubishi Heavy

Based in Japan, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. --
http://www.mhi.co.jp/indexe.html-- was founded by Yataro Iwasaki
in 1884 as a shipbuilding firm called Nagasaki Shipyard & Machinery
Works, which was later named Mitsubishi Shipbuilding Co. Ltd., and
then again launched as Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. in 1934 as
a private firm that manufactured ships, heavy machinery, airplanes
and railroad cars.

In 1950, Mitsubishi Heavy was divided into three separate entities
on a law aimed toward dissolving Nagasaki Shipyard & Machinery
Works and thus dismantling the overconcentration of economic power.
It was later consolidated in 1964 and reborn as Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries, Ltd.


MITSUBISHI MOTORS: S&P Affirms 'BB' LT ICR & Alters Outlook to Pos.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings has revised to positive from stable the outlook
on its long-term issuer credit rating on Mitsubishi Motors Corp., a
Japan-based automaker. S&P affirmed the 'BB' long-term issuer
rating.

S&P said, "We revised the outlook based on our view that: 1) its
EBITDA margin is increasingly likely to remain stable at 6% or
higher for the next one to two years thanks to effects of its
strategic efforts, and 2) the company will likely maintain a sound
financial base with a net cash position in the next one to two
years, by maintaining positive free operating cash flow (FOCF) in
the automotive business.

"We believe its EBITDA margin is increasingly likely to remain
above 6% for the next year or two. In fiscal 2020 (ended March 31,
2021), the company's operating profit before depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA) fell into the negative amid the pandemic.
However, its EBITDA margin recovered to 6.3% in fiscal 2021 because
the company reduced fixed costs and sales incentives as part of its
business restructuring efforts. Despite higher raw material costs,
we expect profitability will be underpinned, in fiscal 2022, by
reduced fixed costs. Also, we think a recovery in new vehicle sales
in its core Southeast Asian market and Japanese yen depreciation
will also support the profitability. We expect its new car sales in
Southeast Asia to increase by 15%-20% year-on-year in fiscal 2022
as demand recovers from the pandemic.

"We assume the company will maintain a net cash position in the
automotive business by maintaining positive FOCF over the next one
to two years. In fiscal 2021, the company secured ¥13 billion in
FOCF through efficient working capital management in its automotive
business, despite supply chain disruptions. We estimate it will
generate annual FOCF of ¥10 billion-¥50 billion over the next one
to two years. During that period, we expect annual operating cash
flow to be at ¥100 billion-¥150 billion, and capital expenditures
to be managed at ¥ 90 billion-¥100 billion annually. Its research
and development (R&D) expenses will likely be managed at around 5%
of revenue. This is because we believe the company will shift
toward electrification efficiently through its alliance with Nissan
Motors Co. Ltd. and by taking advantage of its established plug-in
hybrid technologies.

"The positive outlook reflects our view that the company's EBITDA
margin is increasingly likely to remain at 6% or higher over the
next one to two years, despite challenges in the business
environment such as increases in raw materials prices and the
semiconductor chip shortage. We believe the profitability will be
underpinned by reduced fixed costs in its business restructuring.
In addition, a new car sales recovery in Southeast Asia and
Japanese yen depreciation will also likely support its
profitability. Moreover, we expect the company to maintain
conservative financial discipline.

"We may consider an upgrade in the next one to two years if the
following two factors look likely to occur. First, the company's
EBITDA margin will hover above 6% consistently without the
influence of a weaker Japanese yen. Second, we have stronger
expectations that it will maintain positive free cash flow after
shareholder returns."

S&P may consider revising down the outlook to stable if either of
the following scenarios occur.

The EBITDA margin deteriorates to below 6% and is unlikely to
recover quickly. This could happen if there is a deterioration in
the business environment, triggered by issues such as further raw
material price increases or significant reduction in production
because of the semiconductor chip shortage.

S&P sees a prospect of negative free cash flow in its automotive
business persisting due to large investment or increase in fixed
costs, and there is a growing likelihood that financial soundness
weakens.

ESG credit indicators: E-3, S-2, G-3

Environmental factors are a moderately negative consideration in
our credit rating analysis of Mitsubishi Motors Corp. This is due
to the increasingly stringent greenhouse gas regulations the
industry faces. S&P said, "We believe Mitsubishi Motors' R&D
expenses-to-sales ratio will likely remain at around 5% over the
next one to two years, given its aim to increase electric vehicle
sales to 50% by 2030 from 10% today. In this category, it mainly
aims to increase sales of PHEVs. The company's established PHEV
technology and its technology use and development alliance with
Nissan and Renault mean it likely can achieve its target, in our
view." A partial mitigant is Mitsubishi Motors' exposure to ASEAN
countries (historically accounting for over 50% of its operating
profit) with relatively moderate environmental regulations.

Meanwhile, governance factors are a moderately negative
consideration. S&P said, "We have observed steady improvement in
governance since a data manipulation case in 2016. However, we will
continue to monitor the company's efforts to enhance risk
management and its efforts to stabilize profitability."




=====================
N E W   Z E A L A N D
=====================

ARMSTRONG DOWNES: Playground Won't Open in Time for Summer
----------------------------------------------------------
NZ Herald reports that Wellington's beloved Frank Kitts Park
playground will no longer open in time for summer, after a large
commercial building business went into liquidation earlier this
year.

Shareholders in Armstrong Downes Commercial 2012 put their company
in the hands of David Ruscoe and Russell Moore of Grant Thornton,
it was revealed in May.

NZ Herald says the company was building Te Aro's $50 million
152-unit Taranaki St project, The Paddington, as well as working on
a $6 million redevelopment of the waterfront playground.

The playground was getting a re-vamp after its iconic slide was
removed last year following what the city council referred to as a
number of "unfortunate" incidents.

One of those was a 5-year-old who broke her leg while playing on
the tower slide. She broke her right tibia, requiring a full leg
cast from her hip to her toes.

Now, Wellington City Council documents reveal construction is
scheduled to start up again either late this month or in early
September.

This means the project will not be completed until March or April
next year. It was originally meant to open in October.

The council estimated it would cost an additional $1.5 million to
complete the project as a result of the liquidation. Downer is set
to take over the contract.

According to NZ Herald, the council's Infrastructure Committee
chairman, Sean Rush, said it was disappointing the playground would
not be opened as early as planned.

"The liquidation has had that effect, the team has done really well
though and we expect to sign up with Downer this month, keep on the
subcontractors as best we can, and hopefully get it back on
track."


AUBREY EDWARD: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due on Sept. 15
--------------------------------------------------------
Creditors of Aubrey Edward Construction Limited, Aubrey Edward
Group Limited, AEG Browns Bay Limited, and Hurstmere Road Centre
Limited, are required to file their proofs of debt by Sept. 15,
2022, to be included in the company's dividend distribution.

Aubrey Edward Construction Limited, Aubrey Edward Group Limited,
AEG Browns Bay Limited commenced wind-up proceedings on Aug. 16,
2022.

Hurstmere Road Centre Limited commenced wind-up proceedings on Aug.
17, 2022.

The company's liquidator is:

          Benjamin Francis
          Gerry Rea Partners
          PO Box 3015
          Auckland


CORRECTIVE BUILDING: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due on Sept. 20
--------------------------------------------------------------
Creditors of Corrective Building Services Limited are required to
file their proofs of debt by Sept. 20, 2022, to be included in the
company's dividend distribution.

The company commenced wind-up proceedings on Aug. 16, 2022.

The company's liquidator is:

          Thomas Lee Rodewald
          Rodewald Consulting Limited
          Level 1, The Hub
          525 Cameron Road
          PO Box 15543
          Tauranga 3144


JDS BUILDING: Court to Hear Wind-Up Petition on Aug. 25
-------------------------------------------------------
A petition to wind up the operations of JDS Building Limited will
be heard before the High Court at Dunedin on Aug. 25, 2022, at
10:00 a.m.

The Commissioner of Inland Revenue filed the petition against the
company on June 16, 2022.

The Petitioner's solicitor is:

          David Tasker
          Inland Revenue, Legal Services
          PO Box 1782
          Christchurch 8140


LOMAS TRUSTEES: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due on Sept. 15
---------------------------------------------------------
Creditors of Lomas Trustees Limited are required to file their
proofs of debt by Sept. 15, 2022, to be included in the company's
dividend distribution.

Lomas Trustees Limited commenced wind-up proceedings on Aug. 12,
2022.

The company's liquidator is:

          Benjamin Francis
          Gerry Rea Partners
          PO Box 3015
          Auckland


NICOLL GROUP: Court to Hear Wind-Up Petition on Sept. 8
-------------------------------------------------------
A petition to wind up the operations of Nicoll Group Limited will
be heard before the High Court at Napier on Sept. 8, 2022, at 2:15
p.m.

Plan B Hydraulics Limited filed the petition against the company on
June 17, 2022.

The Petitioner's solicitor is:

          Jeffrey Gray Ussher
          Level 19
          191 Queen Street
          Auckland


QUEST INSURANCE: A.M. Best Affirms B(Fair) Fin. Strength Rating
---------------------------------------------------------------
AM Best has affirmed the Financial Strength Rating of B (Fair) and
the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating of "bb+" (Fair) of Quest
Insurance Group Limited (Quest) (New Zealand). The outlook of these
Credit Ratings (ratings) is stable.

The ratings reflect Quest's balance sheet strength, which AM Best
assesses as adequate, as well as its adequate operating
performance, limited business profile and appropriate enterprise
risk management (ERM). In addition, the ratings factor in a neutral
impact from the company's ultimate majority ownership by Federal
Pacific Group Limited.

Quest's balance sheet strength assessment is underpinned by its
risk-adjusted capitalization, which was at the strongest level as
at fiscal year 2022, as measured by Best's Capital Adequacy Ratio
(BCAR). The company's underwriting risk has increased significantly
in recent years due to strong portfolio growth. However, this was
partially offset by its improved asset quality following the sale
of an underlying asset in an illiquid private equity investment in
fiscal year 2021. The current asset allocation of cash, term
deposits and affiliated loans is expected to remain largely
unchanged over the medium term. Offsetting balance sheet strength
factors include the company's small absolute capital base, which
increases the sensitivity of risk-adjusted capitalization to stress
scenarios and changes in future performance, business growth and
dividend payouts.

AM Best assesses Quest's operating performance as adequate and
notes its moderate level of volatility. The company has a five-year
average return-on-equity ratio of 18.8% (fiscal years 2018 to 2022)
and the overall earnings during this period reflect a combination
of robust underwriting performance and positive investment returns.
The company's underwriting performance has improved over the past
two years largely due to a lower expense ratio despite a
deterioration in its loss ratio. The improved expense ratio was
mainly driven by economies of scale, as well as a lower commission
rate due to changes in product mix and the earnings pattern of
premium for long duration products as those policies mature.
However, recent rapid business growth in the company's less
profitable comprehensive vehicle insurance (CVI) has resulted in an
increased loss ratio; this is expected to continue to drive
potential volatility in its operating performance over the medium
term.

Quest's business profile assessment of limited reflects its small
market presence and relatively concentrated niche product offering,
largely as a provider of CVI and mechanical breakdown insurance
(MBI) in New Zealand. The company's scale of operation has
increased significantly in recent years, driven by both the growth
in Quest's direct channels and a strategic partnership with Janssen
Insurance Limited (Janssen), a third-party distributor of
motor-related insurance. This has diversified Quest's distribution
channels outside of affiliated business written in conjunction with
its intermediate parent group, Geneva Finance Limited. However,
there is a level of concentration risk associated with the
company's distribution agreements with Janssen. Prospectively, AM
Best expects Quest's business growth over the medium term to be
driven largely by increased volumes written through the partnership
with Janssen, as well as from direct distribution of MBI and CVI
business.

AM Best assesses Quest's ERM as appropriate given the current size
and complexity of the company's operations. Following recent
business expansion, the company is exposed to an elevated level of
underwriting and execution risk. However, this risk has been
mitigated partially to date through adequate monitoring of
underwriting performance, and a conservative approach to pricing
and reserving supported by a third-party actuary. AM Best considers
Quest's risk management capabilities as appropriate for its key
risks, and expects continual development as the company increases
its scope of operations over the near term.


WHITE SWAN: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due on Sept. 15
-----------------------------------------------------
Creditors of White Swan Trustee 2017 Limited are required to file
their proofs of debt by Sept. 15, 2022, to be included in the
company's dividend distribution.

The company commenced wind-up proceedings on Aug. 15, 2022.

The company's liquidator is David Edward Thomas.




===============
P A K I S T A N
===============

PAKISTAN: CB Rates at 15%, To Closely Watch Inflation
-----------------------------------------------------
Reuters reportst that Pakistan's central bank on Aug. 23 held its
main policy rate at 15%, the bank said in a statement, adding it
would closely watch inflation data and global commodity prices.

"Looking ahead, the MPC (monetary policy committee) intends to
remain data-dependent, paying close attention to month-on-month
inflation . . . as well as global commodity prices and interest
rate decisions by major central banks," the State Bank said in a
statement.

Reuters relates that the decision, which was largely in line with
analysts' expectations, came after the bank hiked rates by 125
basis points at its previous policy meeting in July as the country
experienced surging inflation.

Pakistan is in economic turmoil with fast-depleting foreign
reserves, an historic depreciation of the rupee against the U.S.
dollar and soaring inflation, according to Reuters.

Reuters says the decision comes ahead of a crucial meeting by the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) in Washington next week, at which
the bank said it was expected to approve a $1.2 billion tranche of
lending.

Pakistan's annual consumer price inflation reached 24.9% in July,
the highest in 14 years, according to its statistics bureau.

Still, the bank said there were signs that inflationary demand
pressures were easing, which justified holding rates steady,
Reuters relates.

"With recent inflation developments in line with expectations,
domestic demand beginning to moderate and the external position
showing some improvement, the MPC felt that it was prudent to take
a pause at this stage," the bank said.

It projected headline inflation would peak in the first quarter of
the fiscal year - which began in July - before gradually declining
through the rest of the year.

The bank also welcomed expected fiscal consolidation to around 3%
of gross domestic product, Reuters relays.

"It envisages a strong fiscal consolidation . . . which is
appropriate to cool the economy and ensure a reduction in inflation
and the current account deficit," it said.

To help achieve this result and reduce the country's import bill,
it expected government measures to promote markets closing early,
reduce electricity use, and to encourage remote work from home and
car pooling, the report notes.

Reuters says fiscal consolidation has been a key demand of the IMF.
Pakistan's last loan disbursement from the fund was in February and
the next tranche was to follow a review in March, but the
government of ousted prime minister Imran Khan introduced costly
fuel price caps which threw fiscal targets and the programme off
track.

Pakistan is a country located in South Asia. It has a coastline
along the Arabia Sea and the Gulf of Oman and is bordered by
Afghanistan, China, India, and Iran. Pakistan's capital is
Islamabad.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter-Asia Pacific, S&P
Global Ratings on July 28, 2022, revised the outlook on Pakistan's
long-term ratings to negative from stable. S&P also affirmed its
'B-' long-term and 'B' short-term sovereign credit ratings on
Pakistan, as well as its 'B-' long-term issue rating on Pakistan's
senior unsecured notes and sukuk trust certificates. The negative
outlook reflects growing risks to Pakistan's external liquidity
position over the next 12 months amid an increasingly difficult
economic landscape.




=============
V I E T N A M
=============

DAT XANH: Fitch Affirms 'B' IDR & Then Withdraws Rating
-------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Vietnam-based Dat Xanh Group Joint Stock
Company's Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B' and has
simultaneously withdrawn the rating. At the time of withdrawal, the
Outlook was Stable. The agency has also withdrawn the 'B' rating on
the proposed USD300 million senior unsecured bond with a Recovery
Rating of 'RR4', as the issuance did not materialise.

The affirmation reflects Fitch's expectation that Dat Xanh will
maintain a contracted sales scale of above VND4 trillion over the
medium-term and that its leverage will remain comfortable. We
believe the company will be able to access domestic banks to fund
its operations and land banking needs, and that it will maintain
adequate liquidity.

Fitch has chosen to withdraw the ratings of Dat Xanh for commercial
reasons.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Slower, but Steady, Contracted Sales Growth: Fitch projects
contracted sales to fall to VND5 trillion in 2022 (2021: VND6
trillion), before recovering to VND7 trillion in 2023. Dat Xanh has
pushed back the launch of its major apartment project - Gem
Riverside - to 4Q22 and 2023, resulting in a dip in our
expectations for this year's contracted sales. In addition, Fitch
expects mortgage-loan funded property sales, which represented 55%
of contracted sales in 1H22, to soften amid rising interest rates
and tighter lending to the sector following the State Bank of
Vietnam's April 2022 decree.

Fitch said, "However, we believe medium-term housing demand should
be supported by an appetite for real estate as an inflation-hedge
and store of value amid limited alternatives, along with Vietnam's
steady economic growth and expanding urbanisation. Most of Dat
Xanh's projects under development in the next two to three years
will be located in Ho Chi Minh City and surrounds, including the
provinces of Dong Nai and Binh Duong. Limited new supply,
especially in Ho Chi Minh City, should support house prices and
counterbalance headwinds."

Negative Free Cash Flow: "We forecast free cash flow (FCF) gaps of
around VND6 trillion in 2022 and VND5 trillion in 2023 due to land
acquisitions and Gem Riverside construction. We factor in land
purchases of VND2.5 trillion for 2022 and VND4 trillion for 2023,
as the company expects to increase acquisitions this year. However,
working capital outflow at Dat Xanh's brokerage business should
ease in 2023 due to sector-wide moderating demand for property
sales amid macroeconomic headwinds," Fitch said,

Adequate Bank Access: Fitch said, "We expect Dat Xanh to be able to
fund its operations through a combination of bank loans, local
bonds and cash collections from contracted sales, even in the
absence of international bond issuance. It managed to raise VND1.7
trillion of additional debt in 2Q22, despite tightening bank credit
to the property sector, and had existing working relationships with
more than 10 local banks as at June 2022. However, most of the debt
is concentrated among a few lenders."

Significant Landbank Provides Flexibility: The company estimates
that its landbank is sufficient to support contracted sales for the
next decade. This allows Dat Xanh to slow land acquisitions in
periods of weak property sales to preserve liquidity. Fitch said,
"We also think the company has the flexibility to delay the
construction of Gem Riverside to 2023, as the project has not been
launched. Dat Xanh's plans to raise VND4 trillion via a private
equity placement in 4Q21 did not materialize, but it managed to
maintain low leverage by reducing land acquisitions in 1H22."

Balance Sheet Remains Healthy: Fitch said, "We expect Dat Xanh's
net leverage to rise to around 35% in 2023, from 8% in 2021, as it
undertakes more land acquisitions and major construction in the
next two years. As such, the company should have sufficient
leverage headroom to fund its growth aspirations in real-estate
development and brokerage in the next one to two years,
counterbalancing risks from negative FCF."

DXG's moderate leverage, especially relative to international
peers, is also supported by public and preferential equity
issuances, which totaled VND3.9 trillion in 2016, 2019 and 2020.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Dat Xanh's rating can be compared with that of Vietnamese
developers BIM Land Joint Stock Company (BIML, B/Stable) and Phat
Dat Real Estate Development Corp (PDR, B/Stable), as well as that
of Indonesian property developers, PT Ciputra Development Tbk
(CTRA, B+/Positive) and PT Lippo Karawaci TBK (B-/Stable).

Dat Xanh, BIML and PDR are rated at the same level, as they have
similar cash collection scale and net leverage. BIML's operating
cash flow is generally positive due its largely pre-paid land, but
this is counterbalanced by its portfolio exposure to
tourism-related properties.

CTRA is rated higher than Dat Xanh due to its sustained leading
market position among Indonesian developers, with annual
attributable contracted sales of more than USD300 million and
mostly neutral operating cash flow. Dat Xanh, on the other hand,
has a short record of maintaining contracted sales of around USD200
million and mostly negative operating cash flow. CTRA's rating is
also supported by its exposure to non-development income from
commercial properties, which provides additional financial
flexibility. The Positive Outlook on CTRA reflects the possibility
that the company could sustain higher presales over the medium
term, which could lead to an upgrade.

Lippo's rating reflects its weaker business and financial profile,
despite similar contracted sales scale to Dat Xanh. Lippo has been
generating negative FCF, even in the absence of land banking,
although this has been on an improving trend in the last 12 months.
However, we expect negative FCF in the next 12-18 months amid
inflationary pressures and a rising interest-rate environment. We
also expect Lippo's leverage to remain higher than that of Dat Xanh
over the medium term, at around 45%-50%.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer:

- Contracted sales of VND5.0 trillion-7.5 trillion in 2022-2023

- EBITDA of VND2.0 trillion in 2022 and VND2.7 trillion in 2023
   (2021: VND2.8 trillion)

- FCF of negative VND5.9 trillion in 2022 and negative VND5
   trillion in 2023 (2021: positive VND1.2 trillion)

- Land banking of VND2.5 trillion in 2022 and VND3.9 trillion in
   2023

- 40% cash dividend payout at the Dat Xanh Real Estate Services
   level

KEY RECOVERY RATING ASSUMPTIONS

- Fitch assumes Dat Xanh will be liquidated in a bankruptcy
   rather than continue as a going-concern, because it is an
   asset-trading company.

- Fitch deducts 10% of the liquidation value on account of
   administrative costs.

- Fitch has removed assets and debt attributable to the non-
   guarantor group when calculating recovery analysis.

- Fitch assumed zero recovery value for cash and cash equivalents

   in arriving at the liquidation value, on the assumption that
   cash will dissipate as the company tends towards default.

- To estimate the liquidation value, Fitch assumes a 75% advance
   rate against account receivables, in line with our assumption
   for south and south-east Asian property peers. Account
   receivables stem mainly from the development business, as well
   as deposits placed with third-party developer property projects

   undertaken by the brokerage business.

- Fitch applies an advance rate of 50% against property
   inventories. Fitch has deducted the value of customer advances
   collected by the development-property business to exclude the
   portion of inventory that is deliverable against these
   advances.

- Fitch said, "We assume a 50% advance rate for the brokerage
   arm's deposits for marketing and distribution, in line with the

   advance rate for property inventories. The brokerage arm is
   refunded the deposits upon the successful sale of 60%-70% of
   the project value, and in limited instances is able to take
   over the balance unsold inventory value of the project.
   Historical losses on account receivables are negligible."

- Most of Dat Xanh's domestic bank debt is secured and ranks
   prior to unsecured debt in the liability waterfall. Dat Xanh
   has undrawn lines of VND6.5 trillion, but does not pay
   commitment fees on these lines, which it says is in line with
   local practice. Fitch has not regarded these lines as committed

   and has not assumed they will be available as the company tends

   towards default.

These assumptions result in a 'RR1' Recovery Rate for the
outstanding senior unsecured debt. Nevertheless, Fitch rates the
senior unsecured debt at 'B' with a Recovery Rating of 'RR4'
because Vietnam falls into Group D of creditor-friendliness under
our Country-Specific Treatment of Recovery Ratings Criteria and the
instrument ratings of issuers with assets in this group are subject
to a soft cap at the company's IDR.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Rating sensitivities are not applicable, as the ratings have been
withdrawn.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Manageable Liquidity: Dat Xanh reported VND2.5 trillion in cash on
its balance sheet as of end-June 2022 and VND3.2 trillion of debt
maturing in the next 12 months. "We expect the company to spend
another VND1.2 trillion on land purchase in 2H22 and that it will
need to tap external sources to fund these payments and the
construction costs of new projects. This should free up operating
cash flow to manage its short-term debt maturities," Fitch said.

ISSUER PROFILE

Dat Xanh is a Vietnam-based real-estate development and brokerage
company. It estimates to have sufficient land bank for around a
decade of contracted sales as at end-June 2022. Its real-estate
brokerage arm is one of the largest in Vietnam.

                               Rating          Prior
                               ------          -----
Dat Xanh Group
Joint Stock Company     

                        LT IDR   B    Affirmed   B

                        LT IDR   WD   Withdrawn  B

  senior unsecured      LT       WD   Withdrawn  B



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Asia Pacific is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Joy A. Agravante, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2022.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9482.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding,
electronic re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited
without prior written permission of the publishers.
Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed
to be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

TCR-AP subscription rate is US$775 for 6 months delivered via e-
mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance
thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information, contact
Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.



                *** End of Transmission ***