/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCREUR_Public/181211.mbx         T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                           E U R O P E

          Tuesday, December 11, 2018, Vol. 19, No. 245


                            Headlines


G E R M A N Y

HSH NORDBANK: Fitch Lowers Long-Term IDR to BB+, Outlook Stable
SGL CARBON: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable & Affirms 'B-' ICR


G R E E C E

CAPITAL PRODUCT: S&P Puts BB- ICR on Watch Neg. Amid Spin-Off


I R E L A N D

QUDOS: Enters Liquidation, 1,500+ Insurance Claims in Limbo
ROCKFORD TOWER 2018-1: Moody's Assigns B2 Rating to Class F Notes
ROCKFORD TOWER 2018-1: Fitch Assigns B-sf Rating to Class F Debt


K A Z A K H S T A N

TENGRI BANK: S&P Withdraws 'B-/B' Long-Term Issuer Credit Ratings


P O R T U G A L

BANCO COMERCIAL PORTUGUES: Fitch Raises LT IDR to BB
CAIXA GERAL: Fitch Raises Long-Term IDR to BB, Outlook Positive


R U S S I A

ZLATKOMBANK JSC: Put on Provisional Administration


U K R A I N E

ALFA-BANK JSC: Fitch Assigns B- Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

FINSBURY SQUARE 2017-1: Fitch Affirms 'Bsf' on Class D Notes
FISHING REPUBLIC: Directors Opt to File for Administration
FOUR SEASONS: Set to Launch Formal Sale Process in Rescue Bid
LERNEN BONDCO: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
ONE SELECT: Halts Trading, Ofgem to Select Supplier for Customers


                            *********



=============
G E R M A N Y
=============


HSH NORDBANK: Fitch Lowers Long-Term IDR to BB+, Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded HSH Nordbank AG's Viability Rating
(VR) to 'bb+' from 'bb-' and removed it from Rating Watch
Positive (RWP) following the sale of the former public sector
bank to a consortium of private investors on November 28, 2018.

At the same time, Fitch has downgraded HSH's support-driven Long-
Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'BB+' from 'BBB-' and Short-
Term IDR to 'B' from 'F3' and removed both IDRs from Rating Watch
Negative (RWN). The Outlook on the Long-Term IDR is Stable.

At the same time, Fitch affirmed the bank's Long- and Short-term
deposit ratings at 'BBB-' and 'F3', respectively, and removed
them from RWN. Fitch also affirmed the ratings of several legacy
senior bonds with embedded derivatives that rank pari passu with
senior preferred debt at 'BBB-' and removed them from RWN and
assigned Long- and Short-term programme ratings of 'BBB-' and
'F3' to HSH's senior preferred debt.

The rating action follows the sale of the bank by its former
public sector owners. Following the privatisation HSH's IDRs and
senior debt ratings are driven by the bank's VR as Fitch no
longer factors institutional support from the bank's former
public sector owners into HSH's ratings.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

VR, IDRS AND SENIOR DEBT

The VR, IDRs and senior debt ratings of HSH reflect its corporate
banking focused business model, significantly improved asset
quality and capitalisation balanced by low operating profit,
which Fitch expects to improve gradually, and a predominantly
wholesale-driven funding profile despite plans to increase retail
funding. HSH maintains its business focus on Germany, where Fitch
expects the operating environment to remain solid.

Fitch expects HSH to develop its business model under new
ownership and with a cleaned-up balance sheet. However, Fitch
views HSH's franchise as moderate as it operates in the highly
competitive German corporate banking sector, with a less diverse
business model than universal bank peers, by concentrating on
corporate customers.

Fitch expects profitability to be supported by lower loan
impairment charges following the clean-up of HSH's balance sheet,
and by the bank's plans to significantly increase cost-
efficiency, apply sound pricing discipline, increase fee-
generating businesses and lower funding costs. Fitch believes
that the bank will face challenges in improving revenue given
HSH's role as a commercial bank in a competitive sector, with
relatively high funding costs that should improve only gradually.
Moreover, Fitch believes that the bank's business model and
exposure to cyclical industries, including commercial real
estate, could make the bank's profitability more volatile through
economic cycles.

HSH's asset quality has improved significantly following the
disposal and further run-down of non-core and non-performing
assets. Fitch expects the gross non-performing loan (NPL) ratio
to drop and stabilise at around 2%-3% in the next five years as
NPLs fall to below EUR1 billion at end-2018 from EUR7.4 billion
at end-2017. However, Fitch's assessment of asset quality also
reflects concentration risk in HSH's commercial real estate and
shipping credit exposures, and in the bank's corporates book
remaining skewed towards the home regions in northern Germany.

HSH's common equity tier 1 (CET1) ratio should improve
substantially by end-2018 following the announced repurchase of
hybrid Tier 1 silent participations well below par value. For the
next four years, Fitch therefore expects the CET1 ratio to remain
comfortably above 15%, which Fitch views as adequate given
reduction in HSH's risk appetite and exposure on the bank's
balance sheet. However, Fitch's assessment of capitalisation also
factors in weak internal capital generation, given low net income
expected in the coming years, which Fitch believes is vulnerable
to cyclical performance swings.

Fitch's assessment of funding and liquidity are based on the
expectation that HSH will remain predominantly wholesale-funded
and that its customer loans/deposits ratio will increase. Fitch
believes that the agreement reached between the bank and the
German banking association (Bundesverband Deutscher Banken; BdB)
for a smooth transition to a senior membership in its voluntary
deposit protection fund (DPF) of the private sector banks by 2022
should compensate the loss of funding benefits that HSH has had
to date as a member in the institutional support scheme of the
Landesbanken and savings banks.

The reliance on wholesale funding is mitigated by the bank's
plans to increase its retail deposits base and to raise about
EUR8 billion retail deposits by 2022, representing over half of
total deposits. HSH has already raised more than EUR3 billion
retail deposits this year, which indicates that its target is
realistic. HSH has access to other funding sources, including
covered bonds, asset-backed financing and funding from
development banks. Finally, the implementation of Bank Resolution
and Recovery Directive (BRRD) 2 in Germany allows HSH to issue
senior preferred debt, which ranks senior to senior non-preferred
debt and should allow the bank to reduce funding costs.

Fitch has also withdrawn the short-term ratings of HSH's senior
unsecured debt that ranks pari passu with senior non-preferred
debt, including the debt issuance programme, because these are no
longer relevant for Fitch's coverage.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

Following the privatisation, HSH's Support Rating and Support
Rating Floor reflect Fitch's view on support from the authorities
in case of need. Institutional support from HSH's former owners
is no longer factored into the bank's ratings, and in its
opinion, institutional support from the new private-sector
owners, while possible, cannot be relied on.

The Support Rating assessment of '5' and Support Rating Floor
assessment of 'No Floor' reflect its view that, following the
implementation of legislation and resolution tools pursuant to
the BRRD in Germany in 2015, senior creditors can no longer rely
on receiving full extraordinary support from the German
sovereign, should HSH become non-viable.

SENIOR PREFERRED, DERIVATIVE COUNTERPARTY RATING (DCR) AND
DEPOSIT RATINGS

Fitch rates HSH's debt that ranks pari passu with senior
preferred debt, Deposit Ratings and DCR one notch above HSH's
Long-Term IDR. Under German insolvency law, senior unsecured
bonds that were issued prior to July 2018 and which are not
deemed 'plain vanilla', rank senior to other senior unsecured
bonds issued before that date and rank pari passu with senior
preferred debt issued after that date.

The debt ratings at one notch above the Long-Term IDR reflect its
view that HSH's consolidated buffer of subordinated debt and debt
that ranks pari passu with senior non-preferred debt is likely to
be maintained well above 8% of the bank's risk-weighted assets
(RWAs) and will therefore be sufficient to recapitalise the bank,
preventing a default on other senior preferred liabilities,
including deposits, upon resolution.

STATE-GUARANTEED/GRANDFATHERED SECURITIES

The rating of HSH's state-guaranteed and grandfathered senior
debt and subordinated debt reflect the credit strength of the
guarantor - the federal state of Schleswig Holstein and the City
of Hamburg - and its view that they will continue to honour their
guarantees after the sale of HSH.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

VR, IDRS, AND SENIOR DEBT

HSH's VR, IDRS and senior debt ratings are primarily sensitive to
the bank's ability to improve profitability and to maintain sound
capitalisation. An upgrade of the ratings could follow a material
improvement in operating profitability in line with the bank's
business plan, driven by diversified income sources, adequate
margins and achievement of cost and efficiency targets, which
would translate into a proven record of sound organic capital
generation.

Downward pressure on ratings would arise from an increased risk
appetite, which Fitch does not expect under its new owners, but
which could be signalled by an increased focus on higher-risk
structures or assets. Fitch expects NPLs to increase only
gradually over the next years, and the bank's ratings would come
under pressure if asset quality deteriorates more than expected,
which could be caused by single-name losses. The ratings are also
sensitive to the bank's ability to maintain a sound franchise in
the funding market and to attract sufficient long-term funding
from the wholesale market.

SENIOR PREFERRED, DCR AND DEPOSIT RATINGS

The ratings of HSH's senior preferred debt, DCR and deposit
ratings are primarily sensitive to a decline of HSH's buffer of
subordinated and senior non-preferred debt to below the bank's
recapitalisation amount, which Fitch estimates at about 8% of
RWAs. Fitch would downgrade these ratings and equalise them with
the bank's IDRs if this buffer falls below the recapitalisation
amount. The ratings are also sensitive to changes in the bank's
IDRs.

STATE-GUARANTEED/GRANDFATHERED SECURITIES

The ratings of HSH's state-guaranteed/grandfathered senior debt,
subordinated debt and market-linked securities are sensitive to
changes in Fitch's view of the creditworthiness of the guarantors
or to a change in the guarantors' propensity to provide support,
which Fitch does not expect.

The rating actions are as follows:

HSH Nordbank AG Bank

  Long-Term IDR: downgraded to 'BB+' from 'BBB-', removed from
  RWN; Outlook Stable

  Short-Term IDR: downgraded to 'B' from 'F3', removed from RWN

  Support Rating: downgraded to '5' from '2', removed from RWN

  Support Rating Floor: assigned at No Floor

  Derivative Counterparty Rating: affirmed at 'BBB-(dcr)',
  removed from RWN

  Viability Rating: upgraded to 'bb+' from 'bb-', removed from
  RWP

  Long-term senior unsecured debt, including programme rating:
  downgraded to 'BB+' from 'BBB-', removed from RWN

  Long term senior preferred debt: affirmed at 'BBB-', removed
  from RWN

  Long term senior preferred debt issuance programme: assigned at
  'BBB-'

  Short term senior preferred debt issuance programme: assigned
  at 'F3'

  Short-term senior unsecured debt, including programme rating:
  'F3' withdrawn

  Long-term deposits: affirmed at 'BBB-', removed from RWN

  Short-term deposits: affirmed at 'F3', removed from RWN

  State-guaranteed/grandfathered senior and subordinated debt:
  affirmed at 'AAA'


SGL CARBON: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable & Affirms 'B-' ICR
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on Germany-based graphite
and carbon materials producer SGL Carbon SE to stable from
positive. S&P affirmed the long-term issuer credit rating at
'B-'.

S&P said, "The outlook revision reflects our expectation that SGL
will take longer than previously expected to meet the thresholds
for a higher rating, namely an S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt
to EBITDA of 4x and positive free operating cash flows. Under our
base case, we project adjusted debt to EBITDA of about 4.5x in
2018-2019. We also anticipate another year of negative free
operating cash flows (FOCF), of about EUR60 million-EUR70 million
for 2018, excluding the final payment received in the first
quarter in relation to the disposal of the Performance Products
business segment for about EUR50 million. At the same time, we
continue to assume healthy end-market demand, notably in
batteries and automotive, will translate into high profitability
in the coming 12 months.

"The delay in SGL's deleveraging process stems from greater
capital expenditure (capex) needs to fuel expansion. In our view,
supportive market conditions and higher demand for SGL's main
products have prompted the company to deliberately prioritize
growth over deleveraging in the next few years. We understand
that the company's capex in the coming years will be materially
above its depreciation level (about EUR60 million), and that its
investments will focus on expanding its automotive, LED, and
semiconductor businesses. These projects should increase the
company's utilization rates and therefore support higher cash
flows going forward. We understand that the capex will be on
numerous projects that can be shelved if the market turns sour.
Although we have not factored investments in major projects into
our base case, we don't rule them out as the company progresses
with the current project pipeline.

"We understand that management is committed to maintaining
reported net debt to EBIDTA of less than 2.5x and gearing below
0.5x in normal industry conditions. Using end-September 2018 data
as a starting point, under our calculation, hypothetical leverage
of 2.5x would correspond to adjusted debt to EBITDA of about
4.25x.

"We view SGL's two divisions -- namely carbon fibers and
materials (CFM) and graphite materials and systems (GMS) -- as
more diversified, customer-specific, and profitable, with an
EBITDA margin of around 12%. We view favorably SGL's acquisition
of Benteler's and BMW's shares in ACF, the joint venture
dedicated to establishing the use of carbon as a lightweight
construction material in the automotive industry. This
acquisition will provide growth opportunities for SGL through
developing new products and solutions for customers, which will
better utilize ACF's capacity and potentially replace BMW's
current demand in the medium and long term.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that SGL will see
higher profitability over the coming 12 months, thanks to
increasing end-market demand, notably in batteries and
automotive.

"In our base case, we forecast adjusted debt to EBITDA of about
4.5x in 2018-2019, which is commensurate with the 4x-5x range for
the current rating. In addition, we forecast negative FOCF of
slightly more than EUR100 million in the coming two years.
An upgrade is contingent on SGL's ability to translate healthy
growth in its key markets into stronger demand for its products,
higher profitability, and ultimately into positive FOCF.

"For a 'B' rating, we would expect debt to EBTIDA to stand around
4.0x. Under our base-case scenario, we assume the company will
reach this level by end-2020. In addition, for an upgrade, the
company would need to maintain its financial policy (namely
reported net debt to EBTIDA of 2.5x under normal industry
conditions) and adequate liquidity.

"At this stage, rating pressure is remote. We could lower the
rating if we classified SGL's capital structure as unsustainable.
This would occur if SGL experienced a sharp collapse in demand
for its products, leading to meaningful negative FOCF and
leverage ratios well above 5x."



===========
G R E E C E
===========


CAPITAL PRODUCT: S&P Puts BB- ICR on Watch Neg. Amid Spin-Off
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it placed on CreditWatch with
negative implications its 'BB-' long-term issuer credit rating on
Marshall Islands-registered vessel owner and operator Capital
Product Partners L.P. (CPLP).

S&P subsequently withdrew the rating at the issuer's request.

The CreditWatch negative listing reflects S&P's view that CPLP's
announced spin-off of its crude and product tanker business will
result in a weaker business risk profile due to the significant
reduction in scale and diversity, which outweighs the benefit of
the reduction in absolute debt.

CPLP's crude oil and oil product shipping business is built
around 25 tankers and accounts for about 45% of the group's
EBITDA. After the spin-off, CPLP's fleet will reduce from 36
vessels to 11 (with an average vessel age of 6.5 years) and be
concentrated on 10 containerships and one dry bulker. After the
spin-off, CPLP will have an average charter duration of 5.3
years. Although several containerships benefit from long-term
charters that will expire in 2025, certain vessels are subject to
re-employment in 2020. Therefore, the group's cash flow stability
will depend on future charter rates, which are volatile and
subject to demand and supply conditions.

S&P said, "We expect that following the transaction, CPLP's
reported EBITDA will significantly diminish from about $140
million we forecast in 2018 to $75 million-$80 million in 2019.
This will be followed by about $85 million reported EBITDA in
2020 thanks to additional premium from rubber fittings on five
containerships. Overall, we believe that the smaller EBIDTA base
after the spin-off will increase the group's susceptibility to
adverse industry developments.

"We understand that as part of the spin-off, CPLP's reported debt
will significantly reduce to $290 million or less, from $459
million as of Sept. 30, 2018. After the spin-off, we forecast
that the group would achieve S&P Global Ratings-adjusted funds
from operations to debt of about 25% in 2019 and 30% in 2020.
This is broadly in line with our previous forecasts."

The spin-off is subject to regulatory approval and financing
arrangement, and is expected to close early in the first quarter
of 2019.



=============
I R E L A N D
=============


QUDOS: Enters Liquidation, 1,500+ Insurance Claims in Limbo
-----------------------------------------------------------
Gavin McLoughlin at Independent.ie reports that more than 1,500
Irish insurance claims are in limbo after Danish insurance
company Qudos was placed into liquidation.

Patrona, an Irish insurance company providing administration
services for Qudos, said there were 1,570 claims "ongoing" in
which Qudos was involved, Independent.ie relates.

According to Independent.ie, whether Qudos will be able to pay
claims is in serious doubt after the company's liquidators put
payouts on hold, saying they were gathering information on the
business.

It may turn out that Qudos claims will be paid in full -- but
they may not, Independent.ie, notes.

The Central Bank has "strongly" advised Qudos's 50,000 Irish
customers to seek alternative cover in case they need to make a
claim, Independent.ie discloses.

Qudos was operating in the motor, commercial motor, logistics and
haulage, and household insurance sectors in Ireland.  It did
business via brokers, meaning that some customers may be unaware
Qudos is their ultimate underwriter, Independent.ie states.


ROCKFORD TOWER 2018-1: Moody's Assigns B2 Rating to Class F Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has assigned the
following definitive ratings to notes issued by Rockford Tower
Europe CLO 2018-1 DAC:

EUR218,000,000 Class A-1 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2031, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

EUR30,000,000 Class A-2 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2031, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

EUR36,000,000 Class B Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2031, Definitive Rating Assigned Aa2 (sf)

EUR28,000,000 Class C Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2031, Definitive Rating Assigned A2 (sf)

EUR24,000,000 Class D Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2031, Definitive Rating Assigned Baa3 (sf)

EUR22,800,000 Class E Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2031, Definitive Rating Assigned Ba2 (sf)

EUR9,500,000 Class F Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2031, Definitive Rating Assigned B2 (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's definitive ratings of the rated notes reflect the risks
from defaults on the underlying portfolio of loans given the
characteristics and eligibility criteria of the constituent
assets, the relevant portfolio tests and covenants, as well as
the transaction's capital and legal structure. Furthermore,
Moody's considers that the collateral manager Rockford Tower
Capital Management, L.L.C. has sufficient experience and
operational capacity and is capable of managing this CLO.

The Issuer is a managed cash flow CLO. At least 90% of the
portfolio must consist of senior secured obligations and up to
10% of the portfolio may consist of unsecured senior obligations,
second-lien loans, mezzanine obligations and high yield bonds.
The portfolio is expected to be approximately 73% ramped as of
the closing date and to comprise of predominantly corporate loans
to obligors domiciled in Western Europe. The remainder of the
portfolio will be acquired during the six month ramp-up period in
compliance with the portfolio guidelines.

Rockford Tower will manage the CLO. It will direct the selection,
acquisition and disposition of collateral on behalf of the Issuer
and may engage in trading activity, including discretionary
trading, during the transaction's 4.3 year reinvestment period.
Thereafter, purchases are permitted using principal proceeds from
unscheduled principal payments and proceeds from sales of credit
risk obligations or defaulted obligations, and are subject to
certain restrictions.

In addition to the seven classes of notes rated by Moody's, the
Issuer issued EUR 38.7 million of Subordinated Notes which will
not be rated.

The transaction will incorporate interest and par coverage tests
which, if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to
pay down the notes in order of seniority.

Methodology underlying the rating action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's
Global Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations"
published in August 2017.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the
ratings:

The rated notes' performance is subject to uncertainty. The
notes' performance is sensitive to the performance of the
underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. The collateral manager's
investment decisions and management of the transaction will also
affect the notes' performance.

Moody's modeled the transaction using CDOEdge, a cash flow model
based on the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in
Section 2.3 of the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating
Collateralized Loan Obligations" rating methodology published in
August 2017.

Moody's used the following base-case modeling assumptions:

Par Amount: EUR 400,000,000

Diversity Score: 43*

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2790

Weighted Average Spread (WAS): 3.35%

Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 4.75%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 43.5%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 8.5 years

  * The covenanted base case diversity score is 44, however
Moody's has assumed a diversity score of 43 as the transaction
documentation allows for the diversity score to be rounded up to
the nearest whole number whereas usual convention is to round
down to the nearest whole number.

Moody's has addressed the potential exposure to obligors
domiciled in countries with local currency ceiling (LCC) of A1 or
below. As per the portfolio constraints and the eligibility
criteria, exposures to countries with LCC of A1 or below cannot
exceed 10%, with exposures to LCC of Baa1 to Baa3 further limited
to 5% and with exposures of LCC below Baa3 not greater than 0%.


ROCKFORD TOWER 2018-1: Fitch Assigns B-sf Rating to Class F Debt
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Rockford Tower Europe CLO 2018-1 DAC
final ratings, as follows:

Class A-1: 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable

Class A-2: 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable

Class B: 'AAsf'; Outlook Stable

Class C: 'Asf'; Outlook Stable

Class D: 'BBB-sf'; Outlook Stable

Class E: 'BB-sf'; Outlook Stable

Class F: 'B-sf'; Outlook Stable

Subordinated notes: 'NRsf'

Rockford Tower Europe CLO 2018-1 DAC is a securitisation of
mainly senior secured loans and bonds (at least 90%) with a
component of senior unsecured, mezzanine, high-yield bonds and
second-lien assets. A total expected note issuance of EUR407
million is being used to fund a portfolio with a target par of
EUR400 million. The portfolio is managed by Rockford Tower
Capital Management, L.L.C.. The CLO envisages a 4.25-year
reinvestment period and an 8.5-year weighted average life (WAL).

KEY RATING DRIVERS

'B' Portfolio Credit Quality

Fitch places the average credit quality of obligors in the 'B'
range. The Fitch-weighted average rating factor (WARF) of the
identified portfolio is 29.8.

High Recovery Expectations

At least 90% of the portfolio comprises senior secured
obligations. Recovery prospects for these assets are typically
more favourable than for second-lien, unsecured and mezzanine
assets. The Fitch-weighted average recovery rating (WARR) of the
identified portfolio is 68.9%.

Diversified Asset Portfolio

The transaction has different Fitch test matrices with different
allowances for exposure to the 10 largest obligors (maximum 17%
and 24%). The manager can then interpolate between these
matrices. The transaction also includes limits on maximum
industry exposure based on Fitch's industry definitions. The
maximum exposure to the three largest (Fitch-defined) industries
in the portfolio is covenanted at 40%. These covenants ensure
that the asset portfolio will not be exposed to excessive
concentration.

Portfolio Management

The transaction features a 4.25-year reinvestment period and
includes reinvestment criteria similar to other European
transactions. Fitch's analysis is based on a stressed-case
portfolio with the aim of testing the robustness of the
transaction structure against its covenants and portfolio
guidelines.

Cash Flow Analysis

Fitch used a customised proprietary cash flow model to replicate
the principal and interest waterfalls and the various structural
features of the transaction, and to assess their effectiveness,
including the structural protection provided by excess spread
diverted through the par value and interest coverage tests.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

A 125% default multiplier applied to the portfolio's mean default
rate, and with this increase added to all rating default levels,
would lead to a downgrade of up to two notches for the rated
notes. A 25% reduction in recovery rates would lead to a
downgrade of up to four notches for the rated notes.

DATA ADEQUACY

The majority of the underlying assets or risk-presenting entities
have ratings or credit opinions from Fitch and/or other
Nationally Recognised Statistical Rating Organisations and/or
European Securities and Markets Authority-registered rating
agencies. Fitch has relied on the practices of the relevant
groups within Fitch and/or other rating agencies to assess the
asset portfolio information.

Overall, Fitch's assessment of the asset pool information relied
upon for the agency's rating analysis according to its applicable
rating methodologies indicates that it is adequately reliable.



===================
K A Z A K H S T A N
===================


TENGRI BANK: S&P Withdraws 'B-/B' Long-Term Issuer Credit Ratings
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it had withdrawn its 'B-/B' long-
and short-term global scale issuer credit ratings on Tengri Bank
JSC at the company's request as well as its 'kzBB' long-term
Kazakhstan national scale rating on the bank. At the time of
withdrawal, the outlook on the long-term global scale rating was
stable.



===============
P O R T U G A L
===============


BANCO COMERCIAL PORTUGUES: Fitch Raises LT IDR to BB
----------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded Banco Comercial Portugues, S.A.'s
(BCP) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'BB' from 'BB-'
and Viability Rating (VR) to 'bb' from 'bb-'. The Outlook is
Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

IDRS, VR AND SENIOR DEBT

The upgrade of BCP reflects its stronger fundamentals, driven by
in particular, its improving operating profitability and the
meaningful progress in reducing problem assets. BCP's improved
asset quality has resulted in reduced capital encumbrance by
unreserved problem assets and lower, albeit still high, loan
impairment charges, which have supported profitability during
2018.

BCP's ratings primarily reflect the bank's still weaker asset
quality metrics than some domestic peers' and international
averages and the bank's capitalisation that Fitch views as being
vulnerable to severe shocks, despite the observed improvements.
They also reflect resilient underlying pre-impairment
profitability due to BCP's franchise as the second-largest bank
in Portugal, which allows it to exercise pricing power and good
cost efficiency. Fitch expects the economic environment in
Portugal to remain supportive of the bank's plan to reduce
problem assets to more acceptable levels as well as of the bank's
improving profitability.

BCP's earnings are gradually recovering although during the last
economic and interest rate cycle they have shown they can be
highly volatile. Improvements have mainly resulted from lower
loan impairment charges and better operating efficiency, due to
the deep restructuring undertaken prior to 2017. Fitch expects
loan impairment charges to decrease further in 2019, which should
lead to better operating profitability and a gradual convergence
with international peers'. BCP's pre-impairment operating
profitability and cost efficiency compare well with domestic
peers', offering some upside if and when BCP's loan impairment
charges normalise.

Asset quality has improved, but remains weak by international
standards. BCP's IFRS 9 Stage 3 loans (impaired loans)-to-gross
loans were a high 13.5% at end-June 2018. Fitch expects the ratio
to reach 11%-12% by year-end. This compares with a peak of above
20% in 2014 (as per EBA standards). Loan loss allowance coverage
of impaired loans of about 50% at end-June 2018 also improved but
remains low compared with international peers', resulting in a
high reliance on collateral and guarantees.

The bank's capital position improved owing to a combination of a
EUR1.3 billion equity increase in 2017 and risk-weighted assets
(RWAs) reduction. BCP's capital buffers are moderate and Fitch
views capital as highly vulnerable to severe asset quality
shocks. At end-September 2018, the fully loaded common equity
Tier 1 (CET1) and total capital ratios were respectively 11.8%
and 13.4%. These ratios provide a moderate buffer relative to
BCP's 2018 Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process
requirements. The bank expects a manageable negative impact on
its regulatory capital ratios from Polish subsidiary Millenium
Bank's planned acquisition of Euro Bank in 2019 (less than 40bp
on the group's fully loaded CET1 ratio).

Its assessment of capitalisation considers BCP's exposure to
risks arising from the bank's holdings of foreclosed assets and
investments in corporate restructuring funds. Fitch estimates
BCP's unreserved impaired loans and foreclosed assets were still
high at about 90% of fully loaded CET1 at end-September 2018.
Fitch expects the bank to continue strengthening its
capitalisation on the back of earnings retention and further
problem asset reductions.

BCP's funding structure has generally been stable and the bank's
liquidity position has benefited from substantial loan
deleveraging over the past four years. Customer deposits are
BCP's main funding source, at about 79% of total funding. The
bank's reliance on wholesale funding is more limited, mostly in
the form of senior, covered bonds and ECB funding through
targeted longer-term refinancing operations.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

The bank's Support Rating (SR) of '5' and Support Rating Floor
(SRF) of 'No Floor' reflect Fitch's belief that senior creditors
of the bank cannot rely on receiving full extraordinary support
from the sovereign in the event that the bank become non-viable.
The EU's Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) and the
Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) for eurozone banks provide a
framework for resolving banks that is likely to require senior
creditors to participate in losses, if necessary, instead of - or
ahead of - a bank receiving sovereign support.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

The ratings on subordinated debt and other hybrid capital issued
by BCP are notched down from its VR in accordance with Fitch's
assessment of each instrument's respective non-performance and
relative loss severity risk profiles, which vary considerably.

BCP's Tier 2 notes are rated 'BB-', one notch below the bank's VR
for loss severity.

BCP's preference shares are rated 'B-', four notches below the
bank's 'bb' VR. The notching reflects higher expected loss
severity (two notches) and non-performance risk relative to the
VR (two notches).

RATING SENSITIVITIES

IDRS, VR AND SENIOR DEBT

Further material reduction in BCP's stock of problem assets is
key to an upgrade, since a sustained reduction in problem assets
would result in lower loan impairment charges, stronger
profitability and capital generation and ultimately reduce the
capital's vulnerability to asset quality shocks. The improved
economic environment in Portugal should support further
reductions in impaired loan inflows, higher recoveries and
impaired loan cures, thus facilitating portfolio sales.

Downward rating pressure would arise from a failure to improve
asset quality, weakening profitability or deterioration in the
operating environment in Portugal.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

An upgrade of the bank's SR and upward revision of the SRF would
be contingent on a positive change in the sovereign's propensity
to support the bank. While not impossible, this is highly
unlikely, in Fitch's view.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

The ratings on subordinated debt and other hybrid capital issued
by BCP are primarily sensitive to a change in the bank's VR.
Subordinated and other hybrid instruments' ratings are also
sensitive to a change in Fitch's assessment of the probability of
their non-performance relative to the risk captured in BCP's VR.
This may reflect a change in the group's capital management or an
unexpected shift in regulatory buffer requirements, for example.

The rating actions are as follows:

BCP

  Long-Term IDR: upgraded to 'BB' from 'BB-'; Outlook Stable

  Short-Term IDR: affirmed at 'B'

  Viability Rating: upgraded to 'bb' from 'bb-'

  Support Rating: affirmed at '5'

  Support Rating Floor: affirmed at 'No Floor'

  Senior unsecured debt long-term rating upgraded to 'BB' from
  'BB-'

  Senior unsecured debt short-term rating affirmed at 'B'

   Subordinated notes long-term rating upgraded to 'BB-' from
   'B+'

   Preference shares long-term rating: affirmed at 'B-'


CAIXA GERAL: Fitch Raises Long-Term IDR to BB, Outlook Positive
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded Caixa Geral de Depositos, S.A.'s (CGD)
Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'BB' from 'BB-' and
Viability Rating (VR) to 'bb' from 'bb-'. The Outlook on the
Long-Term IDR is Positive.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

IDR, VR AND SENIOR DEBT

The upgrade reflects CGD's continuous progress on the execution
of its restructuring plan over the past 12 months, which has led
to notable improvements in asset quality, operating profitability
and capital. Fitch believes the improved operating environment in
Portugal has been supportive of problem assets reduction and has
facilitated the achievement of CGD's strategic objectives to
date.

The Positive Outlook reflects Fitch's expectations that CGD will
continue to deliver on the restructuring plan it agreed with the
European Commission as part of the bank's recapitalisation in
2017. This plan includes ambitious asset quality, capital and
profitability targets.

CGD's ratings continue to reflect its weak asset quality and core
profitability, although both elements have improved during the
past 12-18 months, thanks to management's ability to deliver on
stated targets. Further progress on the restructuring plan will
be a key rating consideration. The ratings also take into account
CGD's strengthened capitalisation and acceptable funding.

CGD's asset quality remains weak by international standards,
although improvements have continued throughout 2018 on the back
of increased impaired loan sales, cures and write-offs. Fitch
expects asset quality to improve further. The bank still had a
high IFRS 9 stage 3 loans (impaired loans) to gross loans ratio
of 11.6% at end-June 2018. Fitch expects this ratio to reach
around 10% by end-2018, thanks to announced sizeable impaired
loan sales in 2H18. The bank has agreed with the European
Commission an ambitious impaired loan target of below 7% in 2020.
CGD's loan loss allowance coverage had improved to about 63% at
end-June 2018 and compares well with domestic peers.

CGD has restored moderate capital buffers in 2017 and 2018. The
bank concluded the last phase of its recapitalisation plan by
issuing EUR500 million Tier 2 instruments to the market in June
2018. CGD's fully loaded common equity Tier 1 (CET1) and total
capital ratios were 14.6% and 16.9%, respectively, at end-
September 2018, providing moderate buffers relative to the
regulatory requirements. Fitch expects capital ratios to benefit
meaningfully from the agreed sale of CGD's Spanish and South
African businesses in 2019.

The bank remains exposed to risks arising from its holdings of
foreclosed assets and investments in corporate restructuring
funds. Capital encumbrance from unreserved problem assets (net
impaired loans, foreclosed assets and investment properties) has
improved materially in 2018 to reach a level Fitch estimates at
about 54% of CET1 capital at end-September 2018. However, it
remains high by international standards, making CGD vulnerable to
delays in problem asset reductions.

CGD's core profitability remains weak, although it has improved,
with an operating profit to risk-weighted assets of about 1.5% in
1H18 versus 1.1% in 2017. The bank is progressing well towards
its 2020 profitability targets. At end-September 2018, CGD was
broadly on track on staff reduction and had already completed
about 75% of its planned branch reduction, with limited market
share erosion. Successfully executing its restructuring plan will
be pivotal for the bank to improve its revenue and capital
generation.

CGD's funding is largely based on an ample retail deposit base
that has been stable. Customer deposits accounted for about 89%
of total funding at end-June 2018 and the loans to deposits ratio
was about 90%. The bank reported a net stable funding ratio of
141% at end-June 2018 and liquidity coverage ratio of 253% at
end-September 2018. Fitch views the bank's liquidity position as
comfortable, due to low wholesale maturities in coming years, but
still sensitive to confidence shocks in Portugal.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

CGD's '4' Support Rating (SR) and 'B' Support Rating Floor (SRF)
reflect Fitch's opinion that there remains a limited probability
of extraordinary support being provided to CGD by the Portuguese
state, under the provisions and limitation of the Bank Recovery
and Resolution Directive and the Single Resolution Mechanism,
without the bail-in of senior creditors. This potential support
is based on full and willing state ownership and CGD's market
leading position in the Portuguese market.

SUBORDINATED AND HYBRID INSTRUMENTS

Subordinated debt and other hybrid instruments issued by CGD are
notched down from the VR, in accordance with Fitch's assessment
of each instrument's respective non-performance and relative loss
severity risk profiles, which vary considerably.

Fitch rates CGD's subordinated (Tier 2) notes one notch below the
bank's VR for loss severity.

Fitch has affirmed CGD's preference shares at 'B-'. The rating on
CGD's preference shares is four notches below CGD's VR. The
notching reflects higher expected loss severity (two notches)
relative to senior unsecured creditors and higher non-performance
risk (two notches).

Fitch has affirmed CGD's additional Tier 1 (AT1) notes at 'B-'.
CGD's AT1 notes are rated four notches below the bank's VR. The
notes have fully discretionary interest payments and are subject
to partial or full write-down if CGD's consolidated or
unconsolidated CET1 ratio falls below 5.125%. The notching
reflects higher expected loss severity relative to senior
unsecured creditors given their subordination (two notches) and
higher non-performance risk given the fully discretionary coupon
payment (two notches). At end-September 2018, CGD's phased-in
CET1 ratio was 14.6% on a consolidated basis, which provides the
bank with a buffer from the equity conversion trigger level and
also to its 2018 CET1 Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process
requirement of 8.875%.

SUBSIDIARY

The upgrade of Caixa Banco de Investimento (Caixa-BI), a wholly-
owned subsidiary, mirrors the action on the parent bank. Caixa-
BI's ratings are equalised with those of its parent, driven by
the full ownership, its integration into its parent and the
offering of investment banking products to CGD's clientele. Fitch
does not assign a VR to the institution as Fitch does not view it
as an independent entity that can be analysed meaningfully on its
own right.

The Positive Outlook on Caixa-BI's Long-Term IDR mirrors that on
CGD's Long-Term IDR.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

IDRS, VR AND SENIOR DEBT

Continued progress on the restructuring plan combined with
sustained profitability improvements could lead to an upgrade of
CGD's ratings in the next 18-24 months. Fitch expects a gradual
reduction of problem assets, which combined with improved
operating profitability, should reinforce capitalisation through
capital generation and reduced vulnerability of capital to
unexpected asset quality shocks.

Downward rating pressure would arise from failing to improve
asset quality metrics or operating efficiency, as well as from
deterioration in the operating environment in Portugal.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

An upgrade of the SR and upward revision of the SRF would be
contingent on a positive change in the sovereign's propensity to
support it. While not impossible, this is highly unlikely, in
Fitch's view.

SUBORDINATED AND HYBRID INSTRUMENTS

The ratings of subordinated debt and other hybrid instruments are
primarily sensitive to a change in CGD's VR. Subordinated and
other hybrid instruments' ratings are also sensitive to a change
in Fitch's assessment of the probability of their non-performance
relative to the risk captured in CGD's VR. This may reflect a
change in the group's capital management or an unexpected shift
in regulatory buffer requirements, for example.

SUBSIDIARY

Caixa-BI's ratings are sensitive to rating actions on CGD's IDRs.

The rating actions are as follows:

CGD:

  Long-Term IDR: upgraded to 'BB' from 'BB-'; Outlook Positive

  Short-Term IDR: affirmed at 'B'

  Viability Rating: upgraded to 'bb' from 'bb-'

  Support Rating: affirmed at '4'

  Support Rating Floor: affirmed at 'B'

  Senior unsecured debt long-term rating upgraded to 'BB' from
  'BB-'; short-term rating affirmed at 'B'

  Senior unsecured certificate of deposit short-term rating
  affirmed at 'B'

  Commercial paper programme rating affirmed at 'B'

  Tier 2 subordinated debt long-term rating upgraded to 'BB-'
  from 'B+'

  Additional Tier 1 notes- long-term rating affirmed at 'B-'

  Preference shares long-term rating affirmed at 'B-'

Caixa-BI:

  Long-Term IDR: upgraded to 'BB' from 'BB-'; Outlook Positive

  Short-Term IDR: affirmed at 'B'

  Support Rating: affirmed at '3'



===========
R U S S I A
===========


ZLATKOMBANK JSC: Put on Provisional Administration
--------------------------------------------------
The Bank of Russia, by its Order No. OD-3125, dated December 6,
2018, revoked the banking license of Moscow-based credit
institution Joint-stock Company Zlatkombank, further also
referred to as the credit institution.  According to its
financial statements, as of November 1, 2018, the credit
institution ranked 405th by assets in the Russian banking system.

As JSC Zlatkombank has consistently underestimated credit risk
assumed, the Bank of Russia has repeatedly requested that it
create additional loan loss provisions.

The credit institution's operations were found to be non-
compliant with the law and Bank of Russia regulations on
countering the legalization (laundering) of criminally obtained
incomes and the financing of terrorism with regard to the
timeliness, completeness and reliability of information provided
to the authorized body about operations subject to mandatory
control.  Besides, JSC Zlatkombank was involved in dubious
transit operations and transactions aimed at withdrawing funds
overseas and/or converting them into cash.

The Bank of Russia has repeatedly (4 times over the last 12
months) applied supervisory measures against JSC Zlatkombank,
including two restrictions and one ban on household deposit
taking.

The credit institution's operations showed signs of misconduct by
its executives who sought to withdraw liquid assets to the
detriment of creditors' and depositors' interests.  The Bank of
Russia will submit information about the bank's transactions
suggesting a criminal offence to law enforcement agencies.

Under these circumstances, the Bank of Russia took the decision
to revoke JSC Zlatkombank's banking license.

The Bank of Russia took this decision due the credit
institution's failure to comply with federal banking laws and
Bank of Russia regulations, repeated violations within one year
of the requirements stipulated by Article 7 (except for Clause 3
of Article 7) of the Federal Law "On Countering the Legalisation
(Laundering) of Criminally Obtained Incomes and the Financing of
Terrorism", and the requirements of Bank of Russia regulations
issued in compliance with the indicated Federal Law, and taking
into account repeated application within one year of measures
envisaged by the Federal Law "On the Central Bank of the Russian
Federation (Bank of Russia)".

The Bank of Russia, by its Order No. OD-3126, dated December 6,
2018, appointed a provisional administration to JSC Zlatkombank
for the period until the appointment of a receiver pursuant to
the Federal Law "On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)" or a liquidator
under Article 23.1 of the Federal Law "On Banks and Banking
Activities".  In accordance with federal laws, the powers of the
credit institution's executive bodies were suspended.

JSC Zlatkombank is a member of the deposit insurance system.  The
revocation of a banking license is an insured event as stipulated
by Federal Law "On the Insurance of Household Deposits with
Russian Banks" in respect of the bank's retail deposit
obligations, as defined by law.  The said Federal Law provides
for the payment of indemnities to the bank's depositors,
including individual entrepreneurs, in the amount of 100% of the
balance of funds but no more than a total of RUR1.4 million per
depositor.

The current development of the bank's status has been detailed in
a press statement released by the Bank of Russia.



=============
U K R A I N E
=============


ALFA-BANK JSC: Fitch Assigns B- Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Ukraine-based JSC Alfa-Bank's local
Series S senior unsecured UAH300 million bond (ISIN UA4000198931)
a 'B-' final debt rating and a 'AA(ukr)' National debt rating.
The bond's Recovery Rating is 'RR4'.

The bond's rating is at the same level as the bank's 'B-' Long-
Term Local-Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) and 'AA(ukr)'
National Long-Term Rating. The bond ranks pari passu with the
bank's other senior unsecured obligations.

The final maturity date is June 26, 2023. However, the
bondholders have a put option exercisable once a year. The coupon
is paid every three months (except for the first coupon) at the
rate that is reset annually. The coupon for the period up to June
25, 2019 is 14%.

Alfa-Bank is a medium-sized bank controlled by Luxembourg-based
ABH Holdings S.A. which, in turn, is owned by Mikhail Fridman,
German Khan, Alexey Kuzmichev, Petr Aven, Andrey Kosogov,
UniCredit S.p.A. and The Mark Foundation for Cancer Research.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

The bond rating would likely change in tandem with the bank's
Local Currency IDR and National Rating.

An upgrade of the IDRs and Support Ratings would also require a
strengthening of the bank's support track record. A significant
weakening of the ability and/or propensity of shareholders to
provide support could result in the downgrade of the IDRs and
hence debt ratings.

The other issuer ratings are unaffected and as follows:

Long-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency IDRs: 'B-'; Outlook Stable

Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR: 'B'

National Long-Term Rating: 'AA(ukr)'; Outlook Stable

Viability Rating: 'ccc'

Support Rating: '5'



===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================


FINSBURY SQUARE 2017-1: Fitch Affirms 'Bsf' on Class D Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded Finsbury Square 2017-1's B and C notes
as follows:

Class A: affirmed at 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable

Class B: upgraded to 'AAAsf' from 'AAsf'; removed from Rating
Watch Positive (RWP); Outlook Stable

Class C: upgraded to 'A+sf' from 'Asf'; removed from RWP;
Outlook Stable

Class D: affirmed at 'Bsf'; removed from RWP; Outlook Stable

Class X: affirmed at 'BB+sf'; removed from RWP; Outlook Stable

This transaction is a securitisation of near-prime owner-occupied
and buy-to-let (BTL) mortgages originated by Kensington Mortgage
Company in the UK.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Counterparty Criteria Updated

Finsbury Square 2017-1 plc's class B, C, D and X were placed on
RWP due to the updating of Fitch's Structured Finance and Covered
Bonds Counterparty Rating Criteria published on August 1, 2018,
in particular due to the change in the way commingling is
addressed. As a result of this change Fitch now views commingling
as an immaterial risk in this transaction, meaning losses are no
longer sized for. This updated analysis based on the new criteria
contributed to the upgrades of the B and C notes.

Increasing Credit Enhancement

Credit enhancement has increased over the last months due to
sequential amortisation of the notes alongside a non-amortising
reserve fund. Credit enhancement rose to 19.4% (from 17%) for the
class A notes, to 13.1% (from 11.4%) for the class B notes and to
6.1% (from 5.3%) for the class C notes. The increasing credit
enhancement has also contributed to the upgrades of the class B
and class C notes.

Payment Interruption Risk

The class C notes only have access to the general reserve fund
for liquidity purposes. In high stress scenarios the general
reserve fund may be depleted to cover losses and therefore not be
available to cover payment interruption risk. Consequently the
ratings of the class C note are constrained at 'A+sf'. In
contrast, the class A and B notes also benefit from a specific
liquidity reserve fund mechanism.

Lender Adjustment Reduced

A lender adjustment of 1.20x has been applied to the frequency of
foreclosure analysis. This is reduced from the 1.45x adjustment
applied previously for this transaction. This reduction is based
on an updated assessment of the performance of post-crisis
mortgages originated by Kensington since 2010.

Rating Caps

A number of the ratings are subject to caps. The class C notes
are capped at 'A+sf,' due to the lack of access to the liquidity
reserve fund, and as such vulnerable to payment interruption
risk. The class D notes are capped at 'Bsf', due to the notes not
having the reserve fund available for credit support, which makes
the notes vulnerable to default. The class X notes are capped at
'BB+sf' as, being excess spread notes, they occupy a low position
in the priority of payments and have a high sensitivity to stress
scenarios.

VARIATIONS FROM CRITERIA

Self-employed Borrowers

Kensington may choose to lend to self-employed individuals with
only one year's income verification completed. Fitch believes
that this practice is less conservative than other prime
lenders'. For owner-occupied mortgages, Fitch applied an increase
of 30% to the foreclosure frequency for self-employed borrowers
with verified income instead of the 20% increase, as per our
criteria.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

The loans in the pool currently earn a predominantly fixed rate
of interest and all will revert to an interest rate linked to
Libor. Once this has occurred borrowers will be exposed to
increases in market interest rates, which would put pressure on
affordability, and potentially cause deterioration of asset
performance. Should this result in defaults and losses on
properties sold in excess of Fitch's expectations, Fitch may take
negative rating action on the notes.

Rating upgrades are limited by the rating caps described.

USE OF THIRD-PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO RULE 17G-10

Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by,
Fitch in relation to this rating action.

DATA ADEQUACY

Fitch has checked the consistency and plausibility of the
information it has received about the performance of the asset
pool and the transaction. There were no findings that affected
the rating analysis. Fitch has not reviewed the results of any
third-party assessment of the asset portfolio information or
conducted a review of origination files as part of its ongoing
monitoring.

Prior to the transaction closing, Fitch reviewed the results of a
third-party assessment conducted on the asset portfolio
information and concluded that there were no findings that
affected the rating analysis.

Prior to the transaction closing, Fitch conducted a review of a
small targeted sample of Kensington's origination files and found
the information contained in the reviewed files to be adequately
consistent with the originator's policies and practices and the
other information provided to the agency about the asset
portfolio.

Overall and together with the assumptions referred, Fitch's
assessment of the information relied upon for the agency's rating
analysis according to its applicable rating methodologies
indicates that it is adequately reliable.


FISHING REPUBLIC: Directors Opt to File for Administration
----------------------------------------------------------
Fishing Republic on Dec. 6 disclosed that, further to the recent
updates on its financial position, it has not been possible to
raise sufficient equity or other funding for its immediate and
future working capital requirements.

As a consequence, the directors of Fishing Republic Trading
Limited, the Company's 100% owned subsidiary, having taken advice
from Leonard Curtis Recovery Limited ("Leonard Curtis"), on
Dec. 6 filed an application to appoint administrators to this
company.  The filing of the administration application triggers a
moratorium preventing most creditor or other third-party action
against this company or its assets.  The application is likely to
be heard in Court next week at which point it is expected that
Leonard Curtis will be appointed as administrators.  Steps to
appoint administrators to the Company's other 100% owned
subsidiary, Fishing Republic Retail Limited, are likely to occur
in due course.  The directors and Leonard Curtis continue to
explore options for Fishing Republic plc and no decision has yet
been reached on whether it will be placed into administration.

Leonard Curtis has received indicative offers from parties
interested in acquiring some or all of the Group's assets.

A further announcement will be made as soon as is practicable.

The Company's shares remain suspended from trading on AIM.

Status of Nominated Adviser

As stated above, the Company has not been successful in its
fundraising activity.  Further to the announcement on Nov. 30, if
the Company has failed to appoint a replacement Nominated Adviser
by March 4, 2019, the admission of its AIM Securities will be
cancelled.

Fishing Republic Trading Limited is among the largest of UK
fishing tackle shops.


FOUR SEASONS: Set to Launch Formal Sale Process in Rescue Bid
-------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher Williams at The Telegraph reports that the troubled
care homes operator Four Seasons Health Care was expected to
launch a formal sale process on Dec. 10 in the hope of attracting
a rescuer, as a potential financial crunch looms.

The company, which is owned by the private equity firm Terra
Firma but under the effective control of its lenders, led by the
US hedge fund H/2 Capital Partners, has been attempting to
engineer a restructuring of its GBP525 million debt for more than
two years, The Telegraph relates.

Last month, H/2 swept aside Four Seasons' management to install
its own team, which it said would prepare the empire of 343 care
homes for sale, The Telegraph recounts.

Insiders said that, if a buyer could not be found, the fate of
the company, which cares for 17,000 people, was unclear, The
Telegraph notes.


LERNEN BONDCO: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed Lernen Bondco Plc's B3
Corporate Family Rating and B3-PD Probability of Default rating.
Lernen Bondco Plcis the parent company of Cognita Holdings
Limited, the K-12 private education group.

Concurrently, Moody's has affirmed the B2 instrument ratings on
the GBP200 million Term Loan B, the upsized euro denominated
GBP356 million equivalent TLB and the GBP100 million Revolving
Credit Facility, all due 2025, borrowed by Lernen Bidco Limited.
The outlook is stable.

Moody's is withdrawing the Caa2 instrument rating on the euro
denominated GBP225 million equivalent senior unsecured Notes due
2026 issued by Lernen Bondco Plc. This instrument has been
replaced in the capital structure partly with the upsized TLB and
partly with up to EUR160 million shareholder loan.

The proceeds from the facilities have been used, together with c.
GBP1.5 billion equity contribution, to finance the acquisition of
the group by Jacobs Holding AG.

Moody's rating action reflects the following drivers:

  - The transaction is largely leverage neutral given the group's
ability and intention to raise subordinated debt to repay the
shareholder loan in the next 12-18 months. Accordingly, Moody's
expects leverage to remain at c.8x, as measured by Moody's-
adjusted debt/EBITDA, with senior leverage reducing by half a
turn in the process from the opening leverage of the transaction
at closing.

  - Established player in the fragmented private-pay primary and
secondary education market, with a geographically diversified
portfolio of 71 schools in eight countries.

  - Exposure to changes in the political, legal and economic
environment in emerging markets, which represent 68% of group
EBITDA for the fiscal year 2018, ended August 31, 2018.

  - Moody's expectation that the group will continue its strong
performance in the next 12-18 months driven by EBITDA growth and
fee increases above inflation in all countries.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B3 Corporate Family Rating (CFR) reflects the following: (i)
solid position as a larger player in a fragmented market, with a
geographically diversified portfolio of 71 schools in eight
countries; (ii) established track record of achieving revenue and
EBITDA growth through organic and acquisitive student growth and
tuition fee increases above cost inflation; (iii) barriers to
entry through regulation, brand reputation and purpose-built real
estate portfolio; (iv) strong revenue visibility from committed
student enrolments.

Conversely, the rating is constrained by: (i) high Moody's
adjusted debt/EBITDA expected to be maintained at around 8x; (ii)
aggressive debt-funded acquisition and capacity expansion
strategy and resulting lack of deleveraging and free cash flow
historically; (iii) concentration risk as the top ten schools
represent 65% of group EBITDAR; (iv) reliance on its academic
reputation and brand quality in a highly regulated environment;
(v) exposure to changes in the political, legal and economic
environment in emerging markets.

LIQUIDITY PROFILE

Moody's views Lernen's liquidity as adequate, supported by the
undrawn GBP100 million RCF. There will be sizeable cash balances
at closing (GBP65 million), but Moody's understands that those
are held largely at local operations and in some cases not
readily available to management, although can be repatriated via
dividends. Although working capital is structurally negative at
year end, there is considerable quarter-on-quarter seasonality,
that may require the RCF to be drawn at times to sustain
liquidity.

There is a springing senior secured net leverage covenant set at
7.4x flat, tested if drawings under the RCF exceed 40%. Moody's
expects the group to have sizeable headroom under the covenant.

STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS

The B2 rating on the GBP200 million TLB and the euro denominated
GBP356 million equivalent TLB and GBP100 million pari passu
ranking RCF, one notch above the CFR, reflects its ranking ahead
of the shareholder loan. Moody's treats the shareholder loan as
debt, and it is expected to be refinanced by new subordinated
debt ranking behind the senior secured facilities in the next 12-
18 months.

The security package provided to the first lien lenders is
relatively weak and limited to a pledge over shares, bank
accounts, and intercompany receivables, as well as guarantees
from operating companies (80% guarantor test) and a floating
charge provided by the English borrower.

RATING OUTLOOK

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the group
will continue to visibly grow EBITDA from both increased student
numbers and tuition fee growth. Moody's expects that the group
will pursue growth and acquisitions in a prudent manner and
benefit from an adequate liquidity profile. The outlook also
assumes that subordinated debt is issued to repay shareholder
loans.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE

Upgrade pressure on the ratings could arise if Moody's adjusted
debt/EBITDA declines below 7x and free cash flow generation is
positive on a sustainable basis, with adequate liquidity.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE

Downward pressure on the ratings could arise if the group is not
able to grow EBITDA on a sustainable basis, resulting in leverage
increasing above current levels or negative free cash flow
generation during a sustained period of time, or liquidity
weakens. Any material negative impact from a change in any of the
group's schools regulatory approval status could also pressure
the ratings.

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

CORPORATE PROFILE

Headquartered in the UK, Lernen Bondco Plc is an international
independent schools group offering primary and secondary private
education in 71 schools across eight countries in Europe, Asia
and Latin America. Founded in 2004, the group acquired schools in
the United Kingdom, Spain, Brazil, Chile, Singapore, Hong Kong
Thailand and Vietnam, and teaches around 43 thousand K-12
private-pay students. The group is owned by Jacobs Holding AG.


ONE SELECT: Halts Trading, Ofgem to Select Supplier for Customers
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Myles McCormick at The Financial Times reports that One Select
has become the latest UK energy supplier to cease trading, after
less than two years on the market.

The company had 36,000 gas and electricity customers in England
and Wales, the FT discloses.

It stopped trading on Dec. 10, days after coming last in a
Citizens Advice customer service ranking 34 suppliers, the FT
relates.

According to the FT, the energy regulator Ofgem will now select a
new supplier to take on One Select's customers through its safety
net procedure.



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers'
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than US$3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look
like the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell
short.  Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at
historical cost net of depreciation may understate the true value
of a firm's assets.  A company may establish reserves on its
balance sheet for liabilities that may never materialize.  The
prices at which equity securities trade in public market are
determined by more than a balance sheet solvency test.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book
of interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/booksto order any title today.


                            *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2018.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                 * * * End of Transmission * * *