/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCREUR_Public/190530.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                          E U R O P E

          Thursday, May 30, 2019, Vol. 20, No. 108

                           Headlines



B O S N I A   A N D   H E R Z E G O V I N A

SECERANA: Creditors Reject Turkish Investor's Offer for Assets


C R O A T I A

ULJANIK: Court Establishes Creditors Board, June 3 Meeting Set


F R A N C E

INSIGNIS SAS: S&P Withdraws 'B' ICR Following Refinancing
RALLYE SA: Bankruptcy Credit Event Triggers CDS Payout


G E R M A N Y

AI PLEX: S&P Assigns Prelim. B Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
NOVEM GROUP: Fitch Assigns 'B+(EXP)' Long Term Issuer Rating
THYSSENKRUPP AG: Fitch Keeps BB+ IDR on Watch Negative


I T A L Y

DECO 2019: Fitch Withdraws B+(EXP) Rating on Class E Debt


L U X E M B O U R G

GARFUNKELUX HOLDCO: S&P Alters Outlook to Neg on Deleveraging Risk
MATADOR BIDCO: S&P Assigns (P)BB- ICR on Planned Acquisition


R U S S I A

RTS BANK: Declared Bankrupt by Samara Arbitration Court
T2 RTK: Fitch Raises LongTerm IDR to 'BB', Outlook Positive


S W E D E N

SBAB BANK: S&P Lowers Rating on AT1 Hybrids to BB, Off Watch Neg.


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

BRITISH STEEL: More Than 80 Potential Bidders Emerge
FLYBE GROUP: Chief Executive Officer to Step Down in July
VIRGIN MEDIA: Fitch Affirms 'BB-' LT Issuer Default Rating

                           - - - - -


===========================================
B O S N I A   A N D   H E R Z E G O V I N A
===========================================

SECERANA: Creditors Reject Turkish Investor's Offer for Assets
--------------------------------------------------------------
SeeNews reports that the creditors of Bosnian sugar mill Secerana
have turned down an offer from a Turkish investor for the purchase
of the company's assets because of its low price.

According to SeeNews, apart from failing to offer the previously
agreed price, the investor also did not provide an adequate bank
guarantee, news agency SRNA quoted the head of Secerana's board of
creditors, Vojislav Nikolic, as saying.

Mr. Nikolic told a news conference on May 27 after the board of
creditors' meeting, that the commercial court in Bijeljina, in
northeastern Bosnia, had received a letter of interest from a
company called Niva and based in Zabalj, Serbia, which produces
medical equipment, SeeNews relates.

"They are interested in examining the situation at the factory and
submitting an offer after that," SeeNews quotes Mr. Nikolic as
saying.

The board of creditors will convene again on July 4, SeeNews
discloses.  Mr. Nikolic, as cited by SeeNews, said it plans to
continue with the sale of Secerana's assets at a price of BAM10
million (US$5.7 million/EUR5.1 million).

According to earlier media reports, the Turkish investor has
proposed to pay EUR4.25 million for Secerana's assets and promised
to increase its offer in order to meet the ask price prior to the
latest meeting of Secerana's creditors, SeeNews states.

Secerana went bankrupt around four years ago over an outstanding
debt of BAM16.5 million, SeeNews recounts.  The estimated value of
its assets stands at some BAM23 million, SeeNews relays, citing
local media reports.




=============
C R O A T I A
=============

ULJANIK: Court Establishes Creditors Board, June 3 Meeting Set
--------------------------------------------------------------
SeeNews reports that a Croatian commercial court said it has
decided to establish a board of creditors at Uljanik shipyard and
called its first meeting for June 3.

The company's creditors include HBOR, Istarska Kreditna Banka Umag,
Zagrebacka Banka, HEP Elektra, HEP-ESCO, Cosicpromex, and big
suppliers, SeeNews discloses.

According to SeeNews, the court in Pazin said in a statement on May
28 the board will comprise members of the Croatian government, the
Croatian Bank for Reconstruction and Development (HBOR),
state-owned electricity supplier HEP Elektra, as well as two
private individuals -- Valdi Matkovic (one of Uljanik's smaller
creditors) and Samir Hadzic (a former employee).

Earlier this month, the Pazin court launched bankruptcy proceedings
against Uljanik Shipyard and later on against its umbrella company,
Uljanik Group, in a response to a request submitted in March by
Croatia's financial agency FINA over overdue debts, SeeNews
relates.

Uljanik Group also comprises the 3 Maj shipyard, along with smaller
subsidiaries, SeeNews states.

The group has been in financial trouble for some time due to the
adverse effects of the global financial crisis, which resulted in
its shipyards failing to meet contract obligations and losing vital
shipbuilding deals, SeeNews notes.




===========
F R A N C E
===========

INSIGNIS SAS: S&P Withdraws 'B' ICR Following Refinancing
---------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew its 'B' ratings on Insignis SAS (Inseec
U) and its debt at the issuer's request.

Inseec U was sold to new shareholder, Cinven, and completed a
refinancing in April 2019. As a result of the refinancing, Inseec U
has repaid in full its senior secured facilities, including the
EUR275 million senior secured term loan due in 2025 and the EUR25
million revolving credit facility due 2024, and has raised new
private debt.

S&P withdrew the ratings at Inseec U's request.

RALLYE SA: Bankruptcy Credit Event Triggers CDS Payout
------------------------------------------------------
Katie Linsell at Bloomberg News reports that credit-default swaps
insuring Rallye SA's debt will pay out, handing a profit to short
sellers who've bet for years on the company's demise.

Swaps on Rallye, the parent of French supermarket retailer Casino
Guichard-Perrachon SA, were triggered in a bankruptcy credit event,
a panel of traders ruled on May 28, Bloomberg discloses.  According
to Bloomberg, the Credit Derivatives Determinations Committee said
it will reconvene to discuss settlement.

The decision paves the way for a payout on contracts covering a net
US$664 million of Rallye's debt, Bloomberg relays, citing the
latest data from the International Swaps & Derivatives Association.


Rallye's swaps were quoted at 11,195 basis points at 5:00 p.m. on
May 28 in London, signaling about 90% probability of default within
five years, according to ICE Data Services, Bloomberg notes.

Rallye and other Casino holding vehicles were placed under creditor
protection late last week to save the debt-burdened retail group
from collapse, Bloomberg recounts.  

Jean-Charles Naouri, Casino's chief executive officer and chairman
who controls the company through a complex ownership structure, may
lose his status as part of the safeguard proceedings, Bloomberg
states.

France-based Rallye, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the
food, non-food e-commerce, and sporting goods retailing activities
in France and internationally.




=============
G E R M A N Y
=============

AI PLEX: S&P Assigns Prelim. B Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary 'B' issuer credit
rating to AI PLEX Holdco II GmbH (AI PLEX) and its preliminary 'B'
issue ratings to the proposed senior secured debt, co-issued by AI
PLEX Acquico GmbH.

S&P said, "Our ratings are preliminary and will be converted to
final upon receiving the final documentation of the instruments
rated, provided all terms and conditions are aligned with our
initial assumptions, including for terms and conditions of the
non-common equity instruments factored in the structure."

The rating on AI PLEX Holdo II primarily reflects high leverage at
closing of the acquisition, with about 6.0x-6.5x adjusted gross
debt to EBITDA. S&P said, "This is consistent with our view of the
company's private equity ownership after the takeover, translating
into highly leveraged funding structures and financial policies,
both at closing and going forward. The rating also reflects our
view of the business as commodity-like with a narrow focus of
product offerings, and its relatively small scale in comparison
with other chemicals players. We estimate that about 75% of current
profits relate directly to upstream commodities (bulk monomers and
MMA), which are highly sensitive to supply and demand patterns.
Although the company benefits from a strong cost position in this
segment, we forecast that recent supply constraints will ease in
the coming years, resulting in moderating MMA prices and margins.
We believe the business' vertical integration into hydrogen cyanide
(HCN), sound market shares in MMA and derivatives, and further
expansion into more specialty-type downstream products should help
mitigate the expected market softening, sustaining strong free cash
flow and leverage of 6.0x-6.5x, which we see as commensurate with
the rating."

Key drivers of AI PLEX's competitive position include its market
position as a major global player in MMA markets: It is the second
largest globally (12% market share) after Mitsubishi, and No. 1 in
Europe. S&P said, "We view benefits in terms of economies of scale
(with capacity of above 1 million tons), solidity of its market
shares, and diversity of the business. AI PLEX benefits from a
modest diversification from a geographical perspective, slightly
concentrated toward Europe with 52% of sales, followed by the
Americas (28%), and Asia-Pacific (20%). We view the business' end
market exposure as slightly skewed toward cyclical end markets, as
a large portion of product sales are destined to the construction
industry (33%) and auto industry (17%), although the remaining
portfolio is fairly well diversified, including some more stable or
resilient end markets such as pharma and healthcare." Business
diversity is helped by downstream product lines being included in
the carve-out, bringing different market exposures and more
specialized product features in sales and profitability.

S&P said, "We view the production process for MMA as rather
commodity-type, subject to cyclical demand patterns, and of which
pricing is highly sensitive to supply/demand patterns and therefore
highly volatile. However, AI PLEX's cost position in MMA production
is a relative strength in the business, in our view, in that it is
largely vertically integrated into HCN, and operating the various
divisions in a Verbund concept, using energy and procurement under
a synergistic model. AI PLEX operates four core base monomer plants
in Germany, the U.S., and Asia, using C3 + Acetone and C4 +
Isobutene technologies.

"The group's cost position is strong for the sector according to
our estimate, translating into average EBITDA margins for a global
commodity chemicals producer. We view cost position and operating
efficiency in general as key aspects of the competitive position of
commodity chemicals players, therefore we see risks coming from
competing technology in the production of MMA, such as the alpha
production process that appears highly cost competitive. While AI
PLEX's current position is fairly protective in the current
demand/price environment, we do not rule out the perspective of
further commoditization of MMA and derivatives, on the back of
decreasing global production costs and intensifying competition. AI
PLEX's proprietary LiMa technology in the MMA production based on
ethylene, if implemented, may alleviate some of the competitive
risks over the longer term, in our view.

"We also consider the recent very high MMA prices as unsustainable,
given that they have been linked to material supply constraints.
This has been resulting in margins materially above the run-rate
level for the sector, in our view, and we believe the market is
likely to cool down over the coming quarters as a result of
capacity additions and a return to a mid-cycle supply/demand
balance. Although difficult to estimate, we anticipate nonetheless
that demand from key end markets will help absorb upcoming capacity
additions, supporting continued MMA demand and resulting in AI
PLEX's margins being sustained around 17%-18% and free cash flow
remaining largely positive."

Margin pressure is also mitigated by the company's strategy to
expand downstream products, namely in molding compounds,
methacrylate resins, and acrylic products. S&P therefore expects a
portion of monomers and MMA production to be progressively
reallocated to specialty products in the coming years. This is
despite most of the profits being generated in the upstream
segments. But it should enable the business to mitigate direct
exposure to MMA prices, acquire additional specialty margins, and
diversify its end market base, at the expense of upcoming, overall
moderate, capital expenditure (capex) on capacity expansion.

S&P said, "We view credit metrics as clearly highly leveraged over
our rating horizon to 2020, with the EUR1,485 million term loan B
at closing translating into adjusted gross debt to EBITDA of about
6.0x-6.5x on average, and adjusted funds from operations (FFO) to
debt in the 9%-10% area. This reflects Advent International's
highly leveraged funding structure, and our expectation of a
potential aggressive financial policy going forward, although our
base case does not factor in any dividends. For that reason, we do
not net cash balances from our adjusted debt calculation.

"We estimate nevertheless as relative strengths the business'
ability to sustain supportive metrics under the proposed capital
structure, reflected in its strong recurring free cash flow, even
in a moderating business environment, and ample headroom with
EBITDA interest coverage ratios well above 3.0x.

"Our debt adjustments comprise about EUR430 million in pension
liabilities, EUR40 million in future operating lease obligations,
and factoring utilization that management expects at about EUR125
million from 2020. Our EBITDA adjustments relate mainly to
operating lease rent for which we add back EUR8 million. We deduct
restructuring costs although consider the carve-out separation
costs as one-offs.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the company will
sustain adjusted debt to EBITDA of 6.0x-6.5x, supported by growth
in the downstream EBITDA base and materially positive free cash
flows. We also view adjusted EBITDA interest coverage of
approximately 3.5x in our forecast as comfortable for the rating.
We expect moderate leeway for a weakening of credit ratios at the
current rating level, given our expectation of normalizing MMA
market conditions. We also expect adequate liquidity and
comfortable headroom under the covenants for the rating.

"Rating downside may arise should we see adjusted debt to EBITDA
deteriorate to above 6.5x without short-term recovery prospects,
and EBITDA cash interest decrease below 3.0x. This could stem from
a significantly higher-than-expected decline in MMA prices due to a
large increase in market capacity such that market demand could not
absorb it. A material cut in free cash flow and as a result on
liquidity sources could also constrain the rating.

"Rating upside is constrained by group's private equity ownership
and by the highly leveraged metrics we anticipate. However, much
stronger demand for MMA and its derivatives, with sustainable
prices, such that weighted average adjusted debt to EBITDA improved
toward 5.0x, could result in a positive rating action. An upgrade
would also require a clear financial policy commitment from the
financial sponsor."


NOVEM GROUP: Fitch Assigns 'B+(EXP)' Long Term Issuer Rating
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned German automotive supplier Novem Group
GmbH a first-time expected Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of
'B+(EXP)' with a Stable Outlook. Fitch has also assigned an
expected instrument rating of 'BB-(EXP)'/'RR3'/71% to the group's
proposed EUR375 million senior secured floating rate notes.

The ratings reflect the company's leading market position in
interior design trim elements, strong profitability and free cash
flow (FCF) margins, coupled with sound organic growth prospects.
The ratings also factor in high financial leverage (funds from
operations (FFO) adjusted gross leverage), which Fitch expects to
be at 3.9x pro forma for the transaction, as well as some
concentration in terms of customers and products offered.

The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch's expectations that Novem will
continue to generate healthy FCF, while FFO gross leverage will
remain broadly stable over the coming 12-18 months.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Opening Leverage: Pro forma for the refinancing, Fitch
forecasts Novem's FFO adjusted gross leverage to exceed 3.9x at
end-2020 (YE March), which is above Fitch's expectations for the
rating and constrains its financial profile to the 'B' rating
category. Fitch forecasts very limited de-leveraging from 2021
through 2022, due to non-amortizing debt and stable underlying FFO.


However, Fitch expects FFO adjusted gross leverage to decline
towards 3.5x beyond 2022-2023, a level more commensurate with the
rating. Strong cash generation ability provides Novem with
significant de-leveraging potential, should it decide to allocate
cash flows towards gross debt repayments.

Leading Niche Market Position: Fitch views Novem's market position
as strong and sustainable, based on its position as the largest
global supplier within the niche decorative interior trim elements.
Despite the company's comparatively small scale (revenue of around
EUR700 million) compared to the Fitch-rated universe of automotive
suppliers, Novem enjoys a market share of around 40% within global
decorative interior trims and is twice as big as the closest
competitor NBHX (unrated).

Strong FCF Generation: Novem's operations are highly cashed
generative. Fitch projects strong positive FCF, steadily increasing
to about EUR60 million in 2021 through 2023. Fitch expects the FCF
margin to be mid-single digit over the rating horizon, which Fitch
deems solid for the rating and partly offsetting the high leverage.
Strong cash generation is driven by the expectation of stable and
profitable operations aided by moderate trade working capital
requirements, limited shareholder distributions and normalized
CapEx of around 4% of sales, following the completion of major
investment projects in recent years.

Less Volatile Premium Market: Novem focuses on the premium
automotive market, which is smaller than the mass market segment,
but has been more resilient to market downturns and has also shown
a higher growth rate. Fitch expects this trend to continue albeit
at a lower rate, and drivers include sector trends such as
electrification and customization as well as generally strong
demand for and availability of premium cars in emerging markets.
However, on-going sector trends are putting pressure on OEMs and
have resulted in announcements of cost-cutting programmes. This
could have an impact on auto suppliers, including Novem.

Corporate Governance, Shareholder Distributions: Fitch understands
that Novem's owner, Bregal, and management are committed to
de-lever, whilst limiting shareholder remuneration. The rating
reflects Fitch's expectations for sustainably strong levels of
residual cash available for business needs and de-leveraging.
Increased shareholder remuneration leading FCF to decline below 2%
could be negative for the ratings.

High Customer Concentration: Novem's customer concentration is
high, with its top two customers accounting for about 65% of group
revenue, resulting in pronounced reliance on the continuous
commercial success of these customers. Also, the focus on the
premium automotive market creates a naturally smaller client
universe for Novem. However, the dispersion of customer exposure
across multiple car platforms partly mitigates this.

M&A Risk: Although Novem's historical growth has been achieved
organically, Fitch understands that the company's acquisition
approach is more of opportunistic nature. Management expects
continued organic growth, but Fitch believes that acquisitions
could be an alternative way to secure future growth. Fitch's rating
case includes healthy FCF, which could allow for bolt-on
acquisitions of up to an aggregate amount of around EUR200 million
by 2023 if funded with internal cash flow. Larger debt-financed
acquisitions would be treated as event risk.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Novem is smaller than the majority of Fitch's portfolio of auto
suppliers, including Faurecia SA (BB+/Stable), Stabilus SA and
Superior Industries Inc. (b*/Stable/US credit opinion), but more
profitable with typical industry EBITDA margins in a range of
8%-12%, compared with Novem's stronger profitability in the high
teens.

Novem's business profile shows weak 'BB' category attributes, with
an emphasis on the company's defendable niche leadership position
in interior trim elements, medium value-add products, and good
geographical diversification. Its focus on the premium car market
and resulting higher customer concentration combined with a
narrower product offering compares unfavorably with more
diversified suppliers including Faurecia. Similar to most peers,
Novem's exclusive automotive exposure is cyclical and moderately
weaker compared to German peer Stabilus, which shows one of the
least cyclical end-market exposures, supported by about 40% of
revenues stemming from a wide array of non-automotive customers.

Novem's financial profile is in line with a 'B' category rating.
The company's FFO adjusted gross leverage of 3.9x at end-2020, pro
forma for the refinancing, compares well to Superior Industries
(above 5.0x). However, Novem is more levered than Stabilus (below
3.0x).

Although Novem's leverage metrics are moderately weak for the
rating, its financial profile is adequately supported by the
company's strong FCF generation, resulting from industry-leading
profitability margins and comparatively lower capex requirements.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

- Revenue growth at a CAGR of 4.0% 2019-2023 with a higher
   rate in 2022/23 reflecting the phasing of tooling sales
   and related series revenues

- EBITDA margin to erode mildly by around 100bp over the
   four-year forecast period

- Capex of about 3.5%-4.0% of revenues, which is meaningfully
   lower than previous years as several significant capital
   projects have been completed

- Moderately negative working capital requirements of EUR16
   million in 2020 dropping to around EUR10 million annually
   thereafter

- No dividend payments or acquisitions are included in the
forecast

- Effective tax rate of 25%

RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Fitch's recovery analysis reflects a going concern approach as the
company's solid market position in its niche is reflected by the
company's strong margins. This implies a substantially higher value
in maintaining Novem as a business post distress, than in an asset
disposal scenario.

A 35% discount to FY2019 EBITDA of EUR137 million (around the point
of transaction closing) has been applied, representing the point of
theoretical distress. Fitch used a 4.5x multiple, reflecting
Novem´s leading niche position and strong FCF. After deduction of
10% for administrative claims, the senior secured loan holders
would be able to recover approximately 71% of the debt face value,
leading to the senior secured instrument rating of
'BB-(EXP)'/'RR3'/71%.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

- FFO gross leverage below 3.0x sustainably,
- FFO Fixed Charge Coverage sustainably above 4.0x,
- Increased scale with revenues approaching EUR1
   billion and reduced customer concentration.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

- FFO gross leverage above 4.0x sustainably,
- FFO Fixed Charge Coverage sustainably below 3.0x,
- FCF margin sustained below 2%.


THYSSENKRUPP AG: Fitch Keeps BB+ IDR on Watch Negative
------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has maintained thyssenkrupp AG's (TK) Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of 'BB+' and senior unsecured notes
(BB+) on Rating Watch Negative (RWN). Fitch has simultaneously
affirmed TK's Short-Term IDR and commercial paper rating at 'B' and
removed them from Rating Watch Negative.

The rating actions follow the company's announcement that it has
abandoned its plans to separate the group into two standalone,
publicly traded companies and to transfer its European steel
operations into a joint venture with Tata Steel Limited (TSL), amid
the European Commission's expected decision to block this
transaction. It also follows TK's guidance revision for 2019 with
many divisions underperforming, impacted by market headwinds, cost
inflation, and a legal settlement. At the same time, the company
announced the pursuit of other strategic portfolio realignments,
most notably the potential initial public offering (IPO) of its
Elevator Technology unit (ET).

The RWN reflects uncertainty around TK's financial profile and free
cash flow (FCF) generation over the coming 12-18 months, which is
contingent on the cash proceeds from the envisaged ET IPO and their
re-deployment, the level of future minority dividends within ET,
representing a cash drain on the group's FFO generation, but also
the scope of planned restructuring costs, which affects the
short-term FCF generation. The affirmation and removal from RWN of
the Short-Term IDR and the commercial paper rating reflect Fitch's
expectation that these ratings will remain at 'B' upon resolution
of the RWN on the Long-Term ratings.

Fitch will resolve the RWN after the closing of the ET IPO, which
could occur in more than six months from now. Currently, the
closing of this transaction is expected for the financial year
2019/20.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Partial IPO of ET: Fitch views TK's plan to float its ET business
on the stock market as credit positive. Fitch understands that
management's priority for the IPO proceeds is to repay the debt to
strengthen the company's weak balance sheet, but also to fund cash
restructuring costs. ET is the largest contributor of EBIT to the
group and Fitch expects continued solid growth on the back of the
industrialization of emerging markets. However, Fitch notes that
valuation, related transaction costs for the IPO and the
re-deployment of proceeds remains uncertain beyond the company's
commitment.

Fitch understands that TK plans to initially float a minority
stake. Fitch believes the sale of a further stake or entire sale of
ET cannot be excluded, but Fitch would capture this as event risk
beyond the initial IPO. The company guides that it wants to be
ready in 2019/20 to pursue the ET IPO, subject to market
conditions.

Uncertain FFO Generation: Fitch believes the ET IPO would free up a
significant amount of capital that could be used to de-lever TK's
capital structure. De-leveraging will be offset by future dividends
paid to minority shareholders of ET, which could represent a
sizeable cash leakage. Fitch believes that a sustained dividend by
ET will be indispensable to attract equity investors, reflecting
its maturity level, a stable cash generation but also dividend
payout ratios of competitors in the elevator market ranging between
35%-65% of net income. More visibility on the IPO proceeds along
with the ET dividend policy will be a key factor in resolving the
RWN.

Steel JV Collapse Negative: The European Commission's expected
decision to block the steel joint venture with TSL in the absence
of further concessions weakens TK's business profile. Fitch
believes that the reintegration of Steel Europe (SE) reconstitutes
the company's direct exposure to the cyclical European steel
industry, which is suffering from overcapacity. SE will be unable
to use the combined assets' synergies to strengthen its cost
structure. As a mitigating factor, TK's group cash flows will once
again reflect SE's cash flows, which should support its FFO
leverage metrics, especially amid steel earnings remaining above
mid-cycle for the near to medium term.

Holding Structure Positive: Fitch views TK not proceeding with its
plan to separate the group into two standalone, publicly traded
companies as credit positive. TK's current corporate structure
benefits from higher diversification and is less reliant on
cyclical businesses. The ratings would have become the ratings of
TKM, which would have comprised the more seasonal materials
services, forged technologies and bearings, marine systems and the
50% stake in the steel JV with TSL.

Execution Risk Over Restructuring: The group's management announced
a further restructuring programme and aims to cut around 4% of the
global workforce, equating to around 6,000 jobs, and to adopt
leaner corporate headquarters. Fitch believes these measures could
support a sustained improvement in EBIT and operational cash flow
generation, but this will be only achieved through sizeable cash
costs to cover the restructuring programme. Fitch notes the
uncertainty around the magnitude of restructuring costs and related
execution risks.

Capital Goods Businesses Underperforming: Challenged operational
performance with lower margins and thin cash flow generation across
the groups' capital goods units could exert rating pressure if
sustained. Despite a healthy order intake for most of the units,
the company faces continuing challenges primarily stemming from
unfavorable macroeconomic factors. Softer demand for automotive
components in China and Europe, tariffs in the US, loss-making
legacy projects in the Industrial Solutions and Marine Systems
units as well as continuing import pressures in its Material
Services operations weigh on the group's EBIT and cash flow
generation. TK's mature Elevators business continues to provide
generally stable cash flows and margins.

Weak FCF Generation: TK's FCF generation has been subdued over the
past years, as evidenced by consistently negative FCF margins.
Fitch expects FCF margins to remain negative at around -2% at
end-19 (YE September), compared with -1% at end-18. Fitch expects
the announced restructuring programme to additionally weigh on FCF
generation over the coming three years. Fitch believes that a
positive trajectory of sustaining neutral to slightly positive FCF
generation is contingent on the actual magnitude of restructuring
costs, the achievement of targeted cost reductions at the group's
corporate level, but also a substantial improvement in the group's
capital goods operations.

Further Strategic Alternatives: Apart from the ET IPO
consideration, Fitch understands that TK is reviewing its
investments across the remaining business units. SE and Material
Services (MX) could seek consolidation options on a smaller scale,
while TK may pursue different ownership structure for its
Components Technology (CT) Industrial Solutions (IS) or Marine
Systems (MS) units. Fitch understands that strategic alternatives
could entail partnerships or the sale of stakes. Partial
divestiture of the segments, divestiture with subsequent debt
reduction, or strategic restructuring efforts could have a positive
impact on the company's leverage and overall credit profile.
However, Fitch notes that these alternatives are only in very early
stages. Fitch would assess the impact of any transaction as it
occurred.

European Steel Prices Under Pressure: Weakening European steel
demand amid slower European industrial growth, trade tensions, US
Section 232 tariffs, higher energy and raw materials costs and
rising EU imports despite EU trade protection measures continue to
weigh on European steel prices. However, Fitch believes that the
effect of weaker steel prices will be more limited on TK compared
with peers such as ArcelorMittal due to TK's diversification into
the capital goods businesses.

Undersupplied Iron Ore Market: Iron ore's tight supply side has led
to a multi-year high price. This is primarily the result of the
suspension of Vale's Brucutu mine as well as severe weather
conditions in Brazil and Western Australia. The world's biggest
producers of this key steelmaking ingredient reduced their guidance
for 2019. The US imposed sanctions on Iranian iron ore could
further tighten the market. Fitch expects that raw material cost
pressures will persist throughout the year, squeezing TK steel
business's margins and negatively affecting its profitability.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

TK's rating reflects its strong business profile with a more
diversified business profile than steel-focused peers, in
particular closest peer ArcelorMittal S.A. (BBB-/Stable), stemming
from its capital goods businesses, which provide more earnings
stability. This compares with ArcelorMittal's greater scale, more
geographic diversification, vertical integration into raw materials
(iron ore) and stronger credit metrics, notably a more resilient
FCF margin and lower FFO adjusted gross leverage.

Conversely, TK has greater exposure to volatile steel earnings, a
greater fixed cost base and lower production flexibility than
capital goods peers, including KION GROUP AG (BBB-/Stable) and
Atlas Copco AB (A+/Stable). These peers also have a greater
proportion of total group sales derived from stable servicing and
maintenance.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

- Consolidated revenue growth returning to low single-digits
   in 2020 through 2022.

- Re-consolidation of SE into 2018/19 results (previously
   reported as discontinued operations).

- Preparation of an initial ET IPO within 2019/20, floating
   an initial minority stake.

- ET to remain fully consolidated post initial IPO.

- Cash settlement of cartel litigation assumed in 2019 as
   non-recurring cash flow.

- Capex returning to EUR1.6 billion in 2019 (including SE)
   and remaining at that level through 2022.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Fitch expects to resolve the RWN upon the completion of the ET IPO,
when most outstanding credit relevant factors should have emerged.
These include the amount of listing proceeds and envisaged
re-deployment, as well as guidance of the future dividend policy of
TK ET, which is reflected in Fitch's FFO based metrics. At the same
time, Fitch also expects firmer guidance on planned restructuring
efforts.

The composition of these factors will determine the level of the
group's FFO adjusted leverage and cash flow profile.

If the ET IPO is not completed, TK's rating may be affirmed at
'BB+' or downgraded in light of the remaining credit-relevant
drivers.




=========
I T A L Y
=========

DECO 2019: Fitch Withdraws B+(EXP) Rating on Class E Debt
---------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings issued an update on the report on DECO 2019 - VIVALDI
S.r.L. published on May 16, 2019, following the reduction in the
loan balance and adjustment to the note balances. Fitch is
withdrawing DECO 2019 - Vivaldi S.r.L. class E expected rating as
this note is not being issued.

Fitch has taken the following rating actions on DECO 2019 - VIVALDI
S.r.L.:

  EUR122.0 million class A: affirmed at 'A+(EXP)sf';
  Outlook Stable

  EUR39.6 million class B: affirmed at 'A-(EXP)sf';
  Outlook Stable

  EUR41.4 million class C: affirmed at'BBB-(EXP)sf';
  Outlook Stable

  EUR19.23 million class D: upgraded to 'BB(EXP)sf' from
  'BB-(EXP)sf'; Outlook Stable

  EUR5.82 million class E: 'B+(EXP)sf'; withdrawn

The transaction is a 95% securitization of two commercial mortgage
loans totaling EUR233.935 million to two Italian borrowers both
sponsored by Blackstone funds. The loans are both variable-rate
(with variable margins) and each secured on an Italian retail
outlet. A merger of the propco and holdco is expected for the
Franciacorta borrower.

The final ratings are contingent upon the receipt of final
documents conforming to the information already received.

RATING ACTIONS

DB- Italian Retail Outlets-Project Spark
   
A LT  A+(EXP)sf Affirmed  A+(EXP)sf
B LT A-(EXP)sf Affirmed  A-(EXP)sf
C LT BBB-(EXP)sf Affirmed  BBB-(EXP)sf
D LT BB(EXP)sf Upgrade   BB-(EXP)sf
E LT WDsf Withdrawn        B+(EXP)sf

VIEW ADDITIONAL RATING DETAILS

The ratings were withdrawn with the following reason: Bonds
Cancelled

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Weakening Macro-economic Environment

Italian GDP growth has stalled as domestic policy uncertainty and
weaker external demand have dragged down investment, while private
consumption growth has also lost momentum. The risk of this
filtering into asset performance is reflected in Fitch's base
market value declines (MVDs) both being greater than 20%, with no
ratings above the 'Asf' category.

Sound Collateral Stabilizes Income

The portfolio is generally of good quality, attracting solid
occupational demand. The catchment areas support stable sales from
customers who view these outlets as attractive leisure
destinations. This mitigates the characteristically short weighted
average (WA) lease to break of 2.4 years and the predominantly
unrated tenant base.

Franciacorta Weighs on Ratings

With an exit debt yield of 7.6%, the Franciacorta loan's high
leverage is a constraint on the ratings, given the pro rata
structure. This is despite good performance in the fashion outlet,
which has recorded strong rental growth over recent years, due in
part to investment in expanding the centre. Both centers having
large catchment areas limits scope for adverse selection, although
prepayment of Palmanova constrains the classes A to C note
ratings.

Pre-merger Risk

Some EUR35 million of Franciacorta's debt is to the parent holdco.
The mortgaged propco cannot pay dividends before the holdco and
propco are merged. This means excess rent will be trapped, building
credit enhancement as long as the parent pays interest by drawing
on a letter of credit. Once the mortgage is discharged and all
propco debt is settled, the parent can receive liquidation proceeds
net of any unsecured creditors of the propco. No unsecured
creditors affect Fitch's rating analysis.




===================
L U X E M B O U R G
===================

GARFUNKELUX HOLDCO: S&P Alters Outlook to Neg on Deleveraging Risk
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it revised its outlook on
Luxembourg-based debt collection company Garfunkelux Holdco 2 S.A.
(Lowell) to negative from stable. S&P affirmed its 'B+/B' long- and
short-term issuer credit ratings on the company.

S&P also affirmed:

-- The 'B+' issue rating on the existing senior secured
    notes issued by Garfunkelux Holdco 3 S.A.; the
    recovery rating is unchanged at '4'.

-- The 'BB' issue rating on the super senior revolving
    credit facility (RCF) co-issued by Lowell Holding GmbH
    and Simon Bidco Ltd.; the recovery rating is unchanged
    at '1'; and

-- The 'B-' issue rating the senior unsecured notes issued
    by Garfunkelux Holdco 2 S.A. The recovery rating is
    unchanged at '6'.

S&P said, "The outlook revision reflects our view that leverage
will remain high, at 5.25x-5.50x for 2019 (S&P Global Ratings
adjusted), placing pressure on the group to accelerate deleveraging
from 2020 onward. Even though our base-case expectation is still
that leverage will drop sustainably below 5x gross debt to EBITDA
in late 2020, there are substantial short-term risks to this
scenario. As such, we see an increased risk that the group will
miss our forward-looking leverage targets, hence our outlook
revision.

"Our base case is for leverage to fall sustainably lower, to
4.25x-4.75x, but not until late 2020. After some acquisitive
balance sheet expansion, we expect Lowell's more-focused strategy
and economies of scale will begin to deliver higher, stable EBITDA
and support a more sustainable financial position at that time.

"For 2019, however, we forecast slow deleveraging alongside
material balance sheet expansion. We expect 2019 portfolio
purchases to grow modestly from 2018 levels, funded by drawings on
the revolving credit facility (RCF). The effect of the portfolio
acquisitions and RCF drawing will be to slow the pace of
deleveraging for 2019 from our previous forecast. Year-end 2019
leverage will now likely be around 5.3x, compared to our previous
expectation of less than 5.0x. This places greater importance on
deleveraging in 2020, and leaves little flexibility for unexpected
or negative one-offs."

S&P's base case for 2019 credit metrics includes:

-- Debt to adjusted EBITDA of 5.25x-5.50x;
-- Funds from operations (FFO) to debt of 11%-13%; and
-- EBITDA cash interest coverage of 2.9x-3.1x.

Underpinning this base case is S&P's expectation that 2019 will see
further growth in cash flows. However, Lowell's ability to
self-fund portfolio purchases from internal cash flows will remain
burdened by its relatively high cost of debt and continued
portfolio expansion. As such, our forecasted credit ratios assume:

-- Continued cash income growth from the expansion of the
third-party collections business across the group's Nordic and
Northern European portfolios, and the first full-year effect on
group results from the Nordic carve-out business;

-- Supportive growth in EBITDA margins as the group manages its
currently outsized overheads, with EBITDA margins improving by the
low single digits in 2019; and

-- No bond issuance in 2019, although S&P expects the group to
draw about EUR180 million-EUR200 million from its RCF.

S&P said, "Our rating factors in the group's increasingly strong
strategic position within the debt collection industry in Europe.
Following last year's acquisition of the carve-out the group is now
well diversified across nine core geographies, focusing on consumer
debt in these mature, well-regulated markets. Although we do not
see upside to our assessment of the group's competitive position
and scale in the medium term, these factors will likely prove a key
rating support providing reliable, well-priced cash flows beyond
2019-2020.

"We apply a one-notch negative adjustment to our 'bb-' anchor to
arrive at our 'B+' rating. This adjustment reflects Lowell's
track-record of weaker credit metrics relative to peers following
its rapid portfolio growth and aggressive M&A activity. The rating
also reflects that the group's financial sponsor ownership remains
relatively immature and somewhat more aggressive than the anchor
implies.

"The negative outlook reflects our view that Lowell could struggle
to reduce its debt-to EBITDA sustainably below 5x over the next
12-24 months. We also note Lowell's intention to continue its
portfolio expansion materially beyond the portfolio's replacement
rate over the same period, and we expect modest liquidity pressure
over 2019 and 2020 to add stress to the group's financial
position.

"We could lower our rating over the next 12 months if we see
evidence that the group does not have the capacity, or willingness,
to deleverage in line with our base case expectations.
Specifically, if Lowell looks likely to overshoot our gross debt to
EBITDA target range of 5.25x-5.50x in 2019, we would likely take a
negative rating action. We could also consider a negative rating
action if Lowell changes its public commitment to deleveraging, or
delays deleveraging (the timing of which it communicated in its
year-end 2018 results).

"We could revise the outlook to stable if the group appeared
increasingly likely to sustainably meet our deleveraging
expectations, alongside undertaking prudent portfolio expansion and
funding of portfolio acquisitions."


MATADOR BIDCO: S&P Assigns (P)BB- ICR on Planned Acquisition
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigns a preliminary 'BB-' issuer credit rating
to Matador Bidco and a preliminary 'BB-' issue rating and '3'
recovery rating to Matador's EUR540 million term loan B.

S&P said, "We base our preliminary rating on Matador on our
expectation that Matador will acquire 30% of CESPA by the year-end
2019 transaction closure. Matador has no other assets. We rate
Matador using our non—controlling equity interest (NCEI)
criteria, which we use to rate debt instruments issued by entities
that own shares in one or more other entities.

"Against this criteria, our preliminary 'BB-' issuer credit rating
on Matador Bidco (Matador) is two notches below our 'bb+'
stand-alone credit profile on CEPSA. The notching differential
reflects the structural subordination of the distributions Matador
receives from CEPSA, which it does not fully control. It also
reflects differences between Matador's and CEPSA's cash flow
stability, corporate governance and financial policy, and financial
ratios, as well as Matador's ability to liquidate its
investments."

Cash flow stability

S&P said, "We assess Matador's cash flow stability as "positive"
because we expect CEPSA's dividends will be relatively stable
through the oil and gas cycle and increase over time. Further
supporting this assessment are CEPSA's long track record of
distributing dividends, the resilience of its cash flow generation
in times of low oil prices, and the diversity of its activities. We
also factor in CEPSA's dividends coverage of close to 3x. We
consider this relatively robust, therefore allowing for a
substantial drop in CEPSA's EBITDA before dividends would need to
be cut. We also consider the absence of covenants or restrictions
to distribute upstream dividends at CEPSA as positive."

Corporate governance and financial policy

S&P said, "We assess Matador's corporate governance and financial
policy as "positive". Carlyle, via Matador, shares control of CEPSA
with Abu Dhabi-based Mubadala Investment Company. Post the
transaction, Matador will hold a minimum of 30% of CEPSA, but we
understand Carlyle has the option (exercisable before closing) to
acquire a total stake of up to 40%. Matador has some influence on
most key decisions, including those related to yearly dividend
payments. Any changes to financial and dividend policies requires
approval of both shareholders, even though Carlyle has only
minority representation to CEPSA's board. Furthermore, if
shareholders do not agree on a dividend amount in a given year, the
basis would be the dividend distributed in 2018 (EUR351 million).
We estimate that the dividend payout at CEPSA will be about EUR400
million on average over the next few years, which provides ample
headroom to serve the debt obligation of about EUR40 million-EUR45
million a year (including interest payments and amortization).
There is a debt service reserve account of EUR40 million at
funding, and CEPSA has paid at least EUR200 million dividend each
year since 2001, both of which we consider favorable."

Financial ratios

S&P said, "We assess Matador's financial ratios as "neutral" for
the rating. This is because we project interest coverage will be
about 3.0x-3.5x and debt to EBITDA (debt divided by dividends
received minus operating and administrative expenses) will be about
4x during 2019-2021. In 2019, we expect debt leverage will be about
5x, as a result of increased dividend and debt repayment from the
mandatory amortization and the excess cash flow sweep. We project
Matador will receive about EUR110 million in dividends in the first
year following the transactions, and mandatory debt service of
about $45 million (principal and interest) for a debt service
coverage ratio of about 2.8x.

"We assess Matador's ability to liquidate investments as
"negative". This is because Matador is privately held, and it could
be difficult to ascertain the future asset value relative to debt
with certainty.

"The sum of these assessments would reflect a three-notch
differential from our 'bb+' stand-alone credit profile on CEPSA.
However, we then apply one notch of uplift because we believe that
Matador will have more control over dividends compared to peers in
other similarly structured transactions. As a result, the
preliminary rating is 'BB-'.

"The final ratings will depend on our receipt and satisfactory
review of all final documentation and final terms of the
transaction. Therefore, the preliminary ratings should not be
construed as evidence of final ratings. If we do not receive final
documentation within a reasonable time, or if the final
documentation and final terms of the transaction depart from the
materials and terms reviewed, we reserve the right to withdraw or
revise the ratings. Potential changes include, but are not limited
to, utilization of the proceeds, maturity, size, and conditions of
the facilities, financial and other covenants, security, and
ranking.

"The stable outlook on Matador reflects our expectation that it
will maintain adequate liquidity and receive a steady distribution
stream from CEPSA. We expect Matador's debt leverage will be about
5x in 2019 as a result of increased dividend and a cashflow sweep.

"We could lower the rating if CEPSA's dividend distribution rate
decreased to a level that kept Matador's interest coverage ratio
below 3x. We could also lower the rating if Matador's debt to
EBITDA rose above 5x over a prolonged period."

An upgrade is unlikely in the next few years absent an improvement
in CEPSA's SACP. This would be possible if CEPSA made further
material additions to the scale and diversification of its
business, stronger-than-expected market conditions, and funds from
operations to debt sustainably above 50%.




===========
R U S S I A
===========

RTS BANK: Declared Bankrupt by Samara Arbitration Court
-------------------------------------------------------
The provisional administration to manage JSC RTS BANK (hereinafter,
the Bank) appointed by virtue Bank of Russia Order No. OD-512,
dated March 14, 2019, following the banking license revocation, in
the course of the inspection of the credit institution established
that the Bank's officials conducted operations to divert funds
through lending to borrowers with dubious solvency or knowingly
unable to meet their obligations to the Bank.

The provisional administration estimates the value of the Bank's
assets to be no more than RUR0.9 billion, whereas its liabilities
to creditors exceed RUR1.3 billion.

On May 13, 2019, the Arbitration Court of the Samara Region
recognized the Bank as insolvent (bankrupt). The State Corporation
Deposit Insurance Agency was appointed as receiver.

The Bank of Russia submitted the information on the financial
transactions suggestive of criminal offence conducted by the Bank's
executives to the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian
Federation and the Investigative Committee of the Ministry of
Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for consideration and
procedural decision-making.


T2 RTK: Fitch Raises LongTerm IDR to 'BB', Outlook Positive
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded LLC T2 RTK Holding's Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) to 'BB' from 'B+'. The outlook is Positive.

The two-notch upgrade reflects significant deleveraging with funds
from operations (FFO) adjusted net leverage expected at slightly
above 3.0x at end-2019 (4.7x at end-2017). This is due to
substantial market share gains, sustainably stronger profitability
and cash flow generation, and Fitch's revised estimate of lower
operating lease expenses. The Positive Outlook reflects the
company's strong growth prospects and improving financial
performance that is likely to lead to a further reduction in
leverage to below 3x.

T2 RTK is the fourth-largest facilities-based mobile-only operator
in Russia with mobile service revenue market share of approximately
15% at end-2018. The company benefits from close cooperation with
Rostelecom (BBB-/Stable), its large strategic shareholder.
Rostelecom gives T2 RTK access to its extensive country-wide
backbone infrastructure and provides T2 RTK with an opportunity to
offer bundled services including fixed broadband and Pay-TV.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Maturing New Regions. We believe T2 RTK has achieved sufficient
scale across its entire franchise that should allow it to maintain
robust profitability. The company has long completed its entry into
new regions including in Moscow and successfully grown operations
in these territories to a maturity stage so that new regions are no
longer a drag on its margins. We expect the company's EBITDA
margins to continue gradually improving, reducing the gap to the
industry average - the latter is currently in the range of 40%.
However, a full catch-up is unlikely in the short to medium term
(T2 RTK's EBITDA margin was 30% in 2018).

Market Share Gains. T2 RTK has consistently outperformed its peers,
and we expect the company to continue gradually growing its revenue
and subscriber market shares, albeit at a decelerating pace. We
estimate the company's share of mobile service revenue at close to
15% in 2018, from approximately 10% in 2014. While T2 RTK remains
the smallest of the four facilities-based mobile operators in
Russia, it is no longer a heavy outlier in terms of network
coverage or scale, servicing more than 42 million customers at
end-2018.

Value For Money Proposition. T2 RTK remains focused on offering
value-for-money services. This strategy is likely to slow down its
market share gains but may help improve profitability and avoid
aggressive pricing competition. The company is keen to grow the
proportion of heavy data-users that tend to demonstrate lower churn
and higher average revenue per user (ARPU) leading to higher
life-long value per customer. T2 RTK is actively pushing its
flexible 'value for money' tariff plans with less emphasis on
cheaper options.

Lower Leverage. T2 RTK has dramatically improved its leverage, and
Fitch believes further leverage reduction is likely as the company
remains focused on growth, sacrificing shareholder distributions
for now. The company's FFO adjusted net leverage dropped to 3.3x at
end-2018 from 4.7x at end-2017 prompting the two-notch IDR upgrade.
Deleveraging was driven by strong growth and margin improvement,
including from a positive impact of IFRS 15 introduction in 2018.
Also, the operating lease expense used in our calculations starting
from the 2018 financial year was revised lower following input from
management vs. Fitch's assumption of leases equal to 5% of revenues
previously.

Fitch said, "We expect leverage to further decline to slightly
above 3x at end-2019, primarily driven by stronger EBITDA and FFO
generation, and then to below 3x in 2020. We believe the company is
likely to start paying dividends in the medium term but FFO
adjusted net leverage reduction to below 3x is likely to be
sustainable, on par with its key mobile peers in Russia. We do not
project a significant decline in total debt as the company is
likely to spend most of its internally-generated cash on capex
before introducing dividends."

Positive Free Cash Flow. "We expect T2 RTK to maintain positive
free cash flow (FCF) generation supported by sustainably stronger
margins and less aggressive capex. The company's new regions no
longer require massive investments, leading to capex stabilizing at
below 20% of revenues. Cash flow may benefit from tax savings on
the back of accumulated losses including through acquisitions, but
these may require corporate reorganization and we do not factor
them into our projections," Fitch added.

Strategic Relationship with Rostelecom: T2 RTK benefits from a
strategic partnership with Rostelecom, its 45% shareholder,
including through running various joint synergetic initiatives and
having access to Rostelecom's wide back-bone infrastructure. The
two companies have an option to offer fixed-mobile bundled
services, which may give them an edge over their key peers that
lack this option across most of Russia. "We believe any 5G
development is likely to be coordinated with Rostelecom, reducing
5G-related capex requirements," said Fitch.

Shareholding May Change. Any potential shareholding changes may not
be necessarily negative, and Fitch treats them as an event risk.
The company's non-strategic shareholders including Bank VTB have
long indicated their willingness to exit their investment into T2
RTK once the asset matures and becomes fully self-sustainable. Bank
VTB was reported to be in discussions with Rostelecom over its
investment in T2 RTK.

Wider Funding Options Available. Fitch said, "We believe T2 RTK has
an opportunity to diversify its funding options and is no longer
critically dependant on funding from shareholder banks and related
parties."

DERIVATION SUMMARY

T2 RTK is the smallest of the four Russian facilities-based mobile
operators that also include PJSC Mobile TeleSystems (MTS)
(BB+/Stable), PJSC MegaFon (BB/Stable) and VEON Ltd.
(BB+/Positive). It still lacks scale and has lower profitability
versus its larger peers but is gradually catching up and is no
longer heavily disadvantaged in terms of network coverage. T2 RTK
is facing stronger growth prospects as it continues to actively
capture market share in new regions and increases network
utilization through generous data offers. The company is slightly
more leveraged than most of its domestic peers that typically
target FFO-adjusted net leverage of less than 3x. Although T2 RTK
lacks any fixed-line operations, this is addressed by its
partnership with its strategic shareholder Rostelecom.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

- Mid-single digit revenue growth in 2019-2020 gradually
   tapering off to low-single digits in 2021-2022

- EBITDA margin gradually improving driven by the focus
   on higher-value customers and continuing cost discipline

- Cash interest costs of above RUB10 billion per year
   on the back of an only small expected reduction in total debt

- Capex in the range of 20% of revenues

- No dividends in 2019 and 2020

- Continuing cash taxes on par with 2018 payments

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

- Strong operating performance with gradually increasing
   market share and improving FCF generation

- FFO-adjusted net leverage stabilizing at below 3x.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

- A protracted rise in FFO-adjusted net leverage to
   above 3.5x without a clear path for deleveraging.

- Operating under-performance weighing on cash flow generation.




===========
S W E D E N
===========

SBAB BANK: S&P Lowers Rating on AT1 Hybrids to BB, Off Watch Neg.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it has lowered its ratings on the
perpetual noncumulative AT1 instruments of SBAB Bank AB (publ) and
Landshypotek Bank AB to 'BB' from 'BB+'. S&P also removed these
ratings from CreditWatch with negative implications, where they had
been placed on Nov. 27, 2018.

S&P said, "We downgraded this instrument because we no longer
expect the buffer between the bank's regulatory CET1 ratio and the
mandatory going-concern trigger to remain above 700 basis points.
We see an increased risk of nonpayment, write-down, or conversion;
therefore, we have widened the notching we apply to the affected
instrument."

On Dec. 31, 2018, the Swedish FSA implemented a change to the risk
weights it applies for domestic mortgage exposures. It established
a hard Pillar 1 requirement under the Basel framework on banks
using internal rating-based models. Previously, it had applied
institution-specific Pillar 2 requirements.

Although this change does not directly affect the regulatory
capital requirements in nominal terms, nor S&P measures of
risk-adjusted capital and overall creditworthiness of the banks, it
reduces the regulatory capital ratios. This has reduced the buffer
between the regulatory ratios and the AT1 mandatory going-concern
triggers, which are set at 7%.

As of March 2019, SBAB reported a consolidated CET1 ratio of 12.4%,
while Landshypotek reported a CET1 ratio of 13.4%. S&P no longer
expect both banks to maintain CET1 ratios above 14% for the next
two years.

S&P's rating approach for the banks' AT1 instruments is otherwise
unchanged, so they are now rated five notches below the banks'
stand-alone credit profile, reflecting our deduction of:

-- One notch for contractual subordination;

-- Two notches for the instruments' status as Tier 1 regulatory
capital;

-- One notch because the instruments allow for the full or partial
temporary write-down of the principal amount; and

-- One notch because S&P expects the banks' CET1 ratios to remain
within 700 basis points of the instrument's mandatory conversion
trigger point.

  Ratings List

  Downgraded; CreditWatch/Outlook Action  
                          To From
  Landshypotek Bank AB
  SBAB Bank AB (publ)

  Junior Subordinated   BB BB+/Watch Neg




===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================

BRITISH STEEL: More Than 80 Potential Bidders Emerge
----------------------------------------------------
Michael Pooler at The Financial Times reports that hopes of a
British Steel rescue have risen after its liquidators revealed they
had been in touch with more than 80 potential bidders, who have
been given until early June to register their interest in the
stricken company.

According to the FT, the official receiver said that "good
progress" was being made in the hunt for a new owner for the UK's
second-largest steelmaker, which entered into compulsory
liquidation last week after its request for an additional state
bailout was rejected.

"Multiple parties have signed non-disclosure agreements giving them
access to a detailed information memorandum and virtual data-room
that my team has developed to inform their bids," the FT quotes the
official receiver, a civil servant appointed by the High Court to
lead the insolvency process, as saying.

The accountancy firm EY, which is assisting, has sent
non-disclosure agreements to 60 of the prospective buyers, the FT
discloses.

Among the possible bidders is Liberty House, the industrial
conglomerate run by Sanjeev Gupta, which has been monitoring the
situation, the FT states.   Another is the private equity fund
Endless, which was a losing bidder when the business was last sold
in 2016, the FT notes.

The official receiver said a government indemnity to underwrite the
liquidation process has enabled British Steel to continue trading,
the FT relays.

British Steel employs about 5,000 people, mostly at the Scunthorpe
plant in north Lincolnshire.  It has blamed its problems on
Britain's delayed departure from the EU, which has caused a slump
in orders from customers on the continent, the FT recounts.  The
government this month handed British Steel a short-term loan of
GBP120 million to meet the payment, but talks with ministers over
an additional GBP30 million funding line broke down, the FT notes.


FLYBE GROUP: Chief Executive Officer to Step Down in July
---------------------------------------------------------
Josh Spero at The Financial Times reports that the chief executive
of low-cost UK carrier Flybe, which narrowly escaped insolvency
earlier this year, has said she will step down in July.

Christine Ourmieres-Widener took up the job in January 2017,
becoming a rare female chief executive in the aviation industry,
the FT recounts.

She oversaw the tumultuous sale earlier this year of Flybe to
Connect Airways, a consortium of Virgin Atlantic, Stobart Air and
Cyrus Capital, which stepped in to prevent Flybe from going
bankrupt, the FT relates.

In March 2018, Stobart Air's parent company, Stobart Group,
abandoned plans to buy Flybe after the board rejected its offer",
the FT notes.

In a previous interview with the FT, Ms. Ourmieres-Widener said
Flybe had struggled to become profitable because previous
management had ordered "the wrong fleet", a number of Embraer 195
jets, but the carrier was continuing its plan to return them and
reduce its fleet to 70 turboprops.

According to the FT, the new owners of Flybe are working to recoup
tens of millions of pounds being held by companies that process its
customers' card payments.  Flybe warned in January that it was
facing a "very bleak" working capital situation as the credit card
acquirers retained cash as collateral in case the airline failed to
meet charges for their services, the FT discloses.

Flybe, as cited by the FT, said it expected to announce Ms.
Ourmieres-Widener's successor before she leaves.

Flybe is a British airline based in Exeter.


VIRGIN MEDIA: Fitch Affirms 'BB-' LT Issuer Default Rating
----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Virgin Media Inc's (VMED) Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating at 'BB-'. The Outlook is Stable. At the same
time, Fitch has affirmed the group's senior secured debt at
'BB+'/'RR2', unsecured notes at 'B'/'RR6'and the receivables
financing notes (RFNs) at 'B'/'RR5'.

VMED's ratings take into account an operating profile underpinned
by its leading market share in residential broadband, the
technological superiority of its fiber cable network, consistent
operating cash flow and the resilience of operating performance.
This business profile is supported by a competitive but rational
telecoms market. The rating is constrained by net debt/EBITDA
leverage, which management keep towards the high end of a 4x-5x
target range

With operating cash flow (OCF/EBITDA), of GBP2.2 billion, VMED
accounts for more than 40% of its parent, Liberty Global's (LG)
consolidated OCF, making it the group's single largest contributor.
Heightened M&A risk reflects the high net disposal proceeds
generated by LG and the possibility of a merger with or acquisition
of a mobile network operator (MNO) in the UK. In any event, Fitch
would treat transformational M&A as an event risk.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Strong Business Profile: VMED has a strong business profile in a
competitive UK telecoms market. The company consistently meets
financial guidance and has a good record of delivering
low-mid-single digit revenue growth and solid customer growth, in
particular in broadband. A disciplined approach to its cost
structure despite some content cost inflation provides good
visibility of EBITDA margins. Project Lightning network expansion
is delivering target operating metrics although the pace of this
build is behind original targets.

Fitch estimates the company has an in-franchise residential
broadband customer share (the part of the market that generates
most value) of around 40% and that the cable operator consistently
takes around half of quarterly subscriber market growth. This
compares with an incumbent, BT's national customer share of around
35% (4Q18), giving VMED an important in-footprint lead.

Competitive but Rational UK Market: Fitch considers the UK to be a
competitive but rational telecoms market. Content and convergence
are important, with BT having made a significant investment in
pay-TV built around a strong sports offering, while Europe's
leading satellite platform Sky, has used wholesale access to bundle
consumer broadband with its leading pay-TV offering in a market
where content, in particular sport, and is important. Limitations
in the amount of fiber being built by the incumbent (3 million FTTP
homes targeted by 2020) are likely to sustain VMED's leading
broadband position.

Slower Pace of Lightning, KPI Momentum: Project Lightning is the
company's network expansion; targeting an additional four million
new homes passed. Launched in 2015, VMED has reached 1.6 million
homes and is guiding to a roll-out target of around 400,000-
500,000 homes a year. The project is proving slower and capex per
home passed is higher than initially planned. However, other
performance indicators are evolving well, supporting top-line
growth and profitability. Fitch's rating case assumes the build
will now continue into 2023 with early vintage take-up generating
an incremental EBITDA margin of 60%.

2019 OCF Headwinds: Management is guiding to negative OCF impacts
of between GBP110 million-GBP130 million in 2019, the biggest part
being expected increases in programming costs of between GBP60
million-GBP80 million. Fitch is therefore assuming some margin
pressure - Fitch's rating case assumes an EBITDA margin of 42.7% in
2019 versus 44.5% in 2018. With these headwinds embedded in future
forecast years these pressures will continue. Management has a good
track record of achieving efficiencies, while the superior margins
and growing vintage of Lightning subscribers should allow for
margin expansion beyond 2019.

Cash Flow, Leverage Constrained: VMED is investing around GBP400
million a year in Lightning-related capex (including customer
equipment). With management reporting strong project economics,
Fitch views this as a good deployment of underlying cash flow. At
more than 40% of LG's consolidated EBITDA, VMED is the group's
single largest contributor. LG manages its net debt/EBITDA leverage
to an upper limit of 5x. VMED's scale within the group makes its
financial leverage a key driver of the overall LG profile. Fitch,
therefore, assumes VMED will be managed with leverage of around 5x.
Adjusted for Lightning investment, the company exhibits good
deleveraging capacity and a free cash flow margin trending upwards
of double-digits.

M&A Risk: With LG having announced a series of disposals, the group
has generated net cash proceeds of around USD16 billion, with
management commenting publicly over the possibility of
acquisitions; potentially in the UK or Netherlands. The UK remains
a four player mobile operator market with past attempts at
consolidation rejected by the regulator on competition grounds.
Fitch views fixed-mobile consolidation more likely to clear
regulatory hurdles and a transaction involving VMED a possibility.
Given the cash resources at LG and management's commitment to a
4x-5x leverage range, Fitch believes any transaction would likely
to be structured with a degree of discipline. Any deal would be
transformational and could result in a spike in leverage.

Vendor Financing Structural Ranking: The RFNs (and associated VM
facilities) benefit from guarantees from Virgin Media Senior
Investments Limited (VMSI) as well as a number of opco obligors,
creating structural seniority relative to the group's senior
unsecured debt given that the latter is not guaranteed by VMSI.
From an organizational perspective, VMSI sits closer to the
operating assets of the group. The unsecured debt does not benefit
from guarantees from any of the opcos. This structural
subordination gives rise to the one-notch difference between the
RFNs and the group unsecured debt.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

VMED's ratings are underpinned by a strong operating profile,
developed but rational UK convergent market, technological
advantage and broadband-led business strategy. The company's
closest peers include fellow LG-owned cable operators, Telenet N.V
(BB-/Stable), UPC Holding B.V (BB-/RWP) and VodafoneZiggo Group B.V
(B+/Stable). Telenet is potentially its closest peer given the
developed stage of their respective business strategies and strong
competitive position in their markets. The overall importance of
VMED's cash flow to LG and management's stated financial preference
mean that VMED's leverage is likely to remain close to historical
levels. The deleveraging capacity provided by the company's
underlying free cash flow (FCF) and strong operating profile would
allow for a higher rating if not for the shareholder's/VMED's
stated leverage policy. No Country Ceiling, or parent/subsidiary
aspects impact the ratings.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  Revenue growth of around 2-3% over the next few years
  was driven by Project Lightning and price increases.

  Decline in EBITDA margin in FY19 to 42.1% as a result
  of headwinds from programming costs and mobile regulatory
  changes; thereafter Fitch sees modest margin improvements
  to 42.8% by FY22.

  Capital intensity (property & equipment additions including
  those funded through vendor finance as a percentage of
  revenue) to remain elevated at around 28%-29% over 2019-2022.

  FFO net leverage to be maintained at or close to Fitch's
  downgrade trigger of 5.2x through cash repatriation/
  repayment of parent company loans.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  A firm commitment by VMED to a more conservative financial
  policy (for example, FFO adjusted net leverage of 4.5x).

  Continued sound operational performance, as evidenced by
  key performance indicator (KPI) trends and progress in
  both investment and consumer take-up with respect to
  Project Lightning.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  FFO adjusted net leverage expected to remain above 5.2x
  (2018: 5.2x) on a sustained basis.

  FFO fixed charge to cover expected to remain below 2.5x
  (2018: 3.6x) on a sustained basis.

Material decline in operational metrics, as evidenced by declining
KPIs such as customer penetration, revenue- generating units per
subscriber and ARPUs. Evidence that investment in Project Lightning
is being scaled to proven demand will be an important driver.



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2019.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                * * * End of Transmission * * *