/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCREUR_Public/200218.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                          E U R O P E

          Tuesday, February 18, 2020, Vol. 21, No. 35

                           Headlines



D E N M A R K

DKT HOLDINGS: S&P Cuts Issuer Credit Rating to 'B', Outlook Stable


F R A N C E

BANIJAY GROUP: Fitch Lowers LT IDR to B, Off Watch Negative


G E R M A N Y

EO TELEVISION: Motorvision Group Takes Over Operation of eoTV


I R E L A N D

SMURFIT KAPPA: Fitch Alters Outlook on BB+ LT IDR to Positive


I T A L Y

A-BEST 14 SRL: Fitch Affirms Class E Debt at 'BBsf'
MOBY SPA: Reaches Deal with Bondholders to Delay Interest Payment
MOBY SPA: S&P Cuts ICR to 'SD' on Announced Standstill Agreement


L U X E M B O U R G

SK INVICTUS II: Moody's Lowers CFR to B3, Outlook Stable


N O R W A Y

ENDUR ENERGY: Board Opts to File Bankruptcy Petition


R U S S I A

YAROSLAVL REGION: Fitch Upgrades LT IDRs to BB, Outlook Stable


T U R K E Y

ATLASJET HAVACILIK: Applies for Bankruptcy


U K R A I N E

[*] UKRAINE: Creditors of Insolvent Banks Get Over UAH10BB in 2019


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

FAMILY DOCTOR: To Close Following 'Financial Viability' Concerns
INVERCLYDE & NORTH: CSN Care Takes Over Business, 200 Jobs Saved
LAURA ASHLEY: Scrambles to Secure More Funding After Sales Slump
LENDY LTD: Investors Crowdfund Legal Challenge to Administrators
NORTHERN POWERHOUSE: Receives Offers for Three North Wales Hotels

REDWOOD BUSINESS: Court Winds Up Debt Collection Company
TOWD POINT 2020-AUBURN 14: Fitch Assigns CC Rating on Cl. E Debt
TOWD POINT 2020-AUBURN: S&P Rates Class XA Notes 'B'

                           - - - - -


=============
D E N M A R K
=============

DKT HOLDINGS: S&P Cuts Issuer Credit Rating to 'B', Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
DKT Holdings ApS, parent of Danish telecom operator TDC A/S, has
indicated heavier investments in 2020 than S&P Global Ratings
forecast, reflecting aggressive fiber layout and conversion of its
entire mobile network to fifth-generation ready technology.

Therefore, S&P has revised its forecast of S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA to 6.7x
(excluding shareholder loans) in 2020, compared with its previous
expectation of less than
6.0x.  S&P is therefore lowering its ratings on DKT Holdings to 'B'
from 'B+'.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation of stable EBITDA in
2020, due in particular to lower non-recurring costs and content
cost savings, and that management would consider cutting
discretionary outlays if needed to keep leverage in check.

S&P said, "We believe TDC will substantially increase investments
in fifth-generation (5G) and fiber layout acceleration in 2020.  In
our view, Danish telecommunications network operator TDC's capital
expenditure (capex; excluding spectrum payments) will shoot up to
about Danish krone (DKK) 5.9 billion for full-year 2020,
representing 35% of sales, as the company accelerates its fiber
network layout and builds its 5G network to confront fierce
domestic competition and alternative infrastructure operators."
However, capex is likely to substantially deflate in 2021.

TDC's aggressive financial policy will spike in 2020, but it
should, however, recede slightly from 2021. S&P said, "The
combination of considerably higher debt-funded network investments
and a likely outlay for 5G spectrum leads us to forecast S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted leverage of 6.7x in 2020 (9.6x including
shareholder loans), up from about 6.2x in our 2019 estimates,
compared with our previous expectation of less than 6.0x in 2020
and gradually trending down toward 5.5x thereafter."

S&P said, "Due to these heavy investments, we expect TDC's free
operating cash flow (FOCF) will further deteriorate from an already
negative level in 2019 following the 4G spectrum investment.  FOCF
should improve substantially in 2021, however, based on our
assumption of EBITDA turnaround and considerably lower investments
after the temporary spike in 2020. It may remain negative after
lease payments in 2021, but we think management has the flexibility
to cut outlays after 2020, depending on its EBITDA trajectory,
which will support its objective of reducing leverage after 2020.

"We expect TDC will post about-flat S&P Global Ratings-adjusted
EBITDA in 2020 due to lower costs and a relatively sound subscriber
trend.  We expect lower content-related costs in 2020 due to the
end of the Discovery contract, as well as reduced expenditure on
the pending network separation process. This, combined with other
savings and potential commercial traction, or at least better
client retention in TV from sports and own content investments,
should substantially reduce the drag on EBITDA. In addition, fiber
take up should help improve the customer mix and raise prices,
while we foresee steady performance in the consumer fixed broadband
and mobile segments."

TDC's position as the leading telecom operator in Denmark, its
well-invested mobile and cable network, and its sound, yet
temporarily weakened EBITDA margins, support our view of DKT
Holdings' business risk profile.   Thanks to recent investments,
TDC's 4G coverage wasextended to more than 99.5% of the Danish
population at the end of 2019. Furthermore, 100% of its own cable
network was recently upgraded to 1GB broadband speeds. The on-going
fiber rollout and the 5G mobile swap should further support the
group's position in the longer term.

TDC's exposure to the tough market conditions in the fragmented
Danish market represents a key weakness.   The company continues to
face fierce competition in the Danish telecoms market. TDC competes
with three other mobile network operator's in the same Danish
market, as well as utility companies that are deploying and
commercializing fiber.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the
company's EBIDTA will stabilize in 2020 thanks to lower operating
and exceptional costs, resilient mobile and fixed broadband
revenue, and some traction from its extended fiber footprint and
content investments. It also reflects our forecast of S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted senior debt leverage for DTK Holdings of less than
7x in 2020, receding slightly thereafter, and considerably
improving FOCF in 2021 on the back of lower investments and
increasing EBITDA."

The ongoing initiatives carry meaningful execution risk, given the
combination of heavy network and content investments, the
separation process, and a fiercely competitive market.

S&P could downgrade DKT Holdings if:

-- EBITDA fails to stabilize in 2020;

-- S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA increases
    to more than 7x (or more than 10x including shareholder
    loans) in 2020;

-- EBITDA cash interest cover weakens to less than 3x; or

-- FOCF fails to dramatically recover in 2021.

S&P views rating upside as remote given the company's more
aggressive financial policy than previously anticipated. It would
require, in particular, adjusted senior debt leverage at or below
5.5x (8.5x including shareholder loans).




===========
F R A N C E
===========

BANIJAY GROUP: Fitch Lowers LT IDR to B, Off Watch Negative
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings downgraded Banijay Group SAS's Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating to 'B' with a Stable Outlook and removed it from
Rating Watch Negative. Fitch has also assigned a senior secured
debt rating of 'B+'/'RR3'/58% to Banijay Entertainment SAS and
Banijay Entertainment Holdings US, Inc. and assigned a senior
unsecured debt rating of 'CCC+'/'RR6'/0% to Banijay Group SAS.

Fitch has removed the RWN because Fitch now believes Banijay's
acquisition of Endemol Shine Group (Endemol) will complete by
mid-2020, with the proposed capital structure fully in place.

The downgrade reflects Fitch's expectation that Banijay's funds
from operations (FFO) adjusted net leverage will be consistently
higher than the downgrade threshold for a 'B+' rating of 5.5x
following the planned acquisition of Endemol. Endemol's enterprise
value of EUR1.9 billion, together with Banijay's existing debt
refinancing, will be funded by EUR275 million capital increase from
Banijay's shareholders and a combination of term loan B, senior
secured notes and senior unsecured notes.

Fitch believes there is a strong rationale for the acquisition and
expects Banijay to extract meaningful synergies from the deal.
However, the high portion of debt funding in the new capital
structure will increase the pro-forma FFO adjusted net leverage to
6.8x in the financial year to end-December 2020 (FY20) before
deleveraging to 5.6x in FY22, which is more consistent with a 'B'
rating. The transaction is transformative as it entails some
significant execution risk to integrate Endemol, which is twice as
big as Banijay in terms of revenue.

The senior secured debt rating of Banijay Group SAS was withdrawn
with the following reason: Bonds Were Called

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Strategic Acquisition, More Debt: Banijay's EUR1.9 billion
acquisition of Endemol has a strong strategic rationale. The
enlarged Banijay will become the largest independent TV production
firm globally and will enhance its geographical presence and
intellectual property (IP) diversification. However, taking into
account the high portion of debt funding in the new capital
structure, Fitch expects the transaction to increase Banijay's
pro-forma FFO adjusted net leverage to 6.8x by FY20 , which is well
above the downgrade leverage threshold of 5.5x.

High Leverage Leads to Downgrade: On a pro-forma basis, Fitch
expects Banijay's FFO adjusted net leverage to peak at 6.8x at FY20
after the acquisition closes, before deleveraging to 6.2x in FY21
from EBITDA growth and realised synergies. This would bring FFO
adjusted net leverage into the 5.5x-6.5x range consistent with a
'B' rating. The enlarged Banijay will have about 70% production
revenue contributed by recurring shows. However, the inherent
volatility of content production segment remains relevant and will
not be substantially mitigated by its increased size.

Positive Free Cash Flow: Fitch expects the enlarged Banijay's
post-dividend free cash flow (FCF) margin to be 1.6% in FY20,
before returning to above 4%. This expectation takes into account
extra interest costs for Endemol's existing debt until deal closure
and one-off transaction and integration costs. It also reflects
Fitch's view that the company needs to absorb the transaction and
integration costs while post-merger cost synergies gradually feed
through over the next two to three years.

Synergy Plan and Integration Costs: The acquisition should result
in significant savings in overheads and operational costs in
countries in which Banijay and Endemol are both present. The
company has identified about EUR60 million of cost synergies to be
realised in 2020-2022, which should sustainably increase EBITDA.
Fitch believes a meaningful amount of the expected synergies are
likely to be achieved, despite some implementation risk. Fitch
expects the company to incur one-off integration-related costs of
about EUR60 million, to be spread over 2020 and 2021.

Senior Secured Debt Rating: The term loan B and senior secured
notes issued by Banijay Entertainment SAS and Banijay Entertainment
Holdings US, Inc. to finance the acquisition rank pari passu to
each other and rank senior relative to the unsecured notes issued
by the parent, Banijay. Given the much larger amount of debt in the
new capital structure, the recovery prospect of senior secured debt
is at 58%, which is consistent with an instrument rating of
'B+'/'RR3'.

Senior Unsecured Debt Rating: The senior unsecured notes issued by
Banijay Group SAS are structurally and contractually subordinated
to the term loan B and senior secured notes. Given the substantial
amount of prior-ranking debt, Fitch views it unlikely that in a
potential default situation any recovery value would remain for the
unsecured notes, once the secured creditor claims have been met.
Therefore, Fitch rated the unsecured instrument at 'CCC+'/'RR6'.

Supportive Market Growth: Fitch expects the global TV production
market to continue growing at about 2% a year in 2019-2022.
Customers in Europe and the US continue to consume content via
online streaming platforms. The popularity of these platforms
supports strong demand for both scripted and non-scripted content.
This is positive for the organic growth of production companies,
like Banijay and Endemol, which are at the heart of content
creation.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

After acquiring Endemol, Banijay will be the largest independent TV
production firm globally. Its primary competitors remain ITV
Studios, Fremantle Media and All3Media. Banijay has a greater
proportion of unscripted content than its peers, although the
acquisition of Endemol will further increase its exposure to
scripted content.

Fitch covers several UK and US peers in the diversified media
industry, such as Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. (A/Stable; now
owned by The Walt Disney Company) and NBC Universal Media LLC
(A-/Stable; now owned by Comcast Corp.). They are much larger and
more diversified, occupy stronger competitive positions in the
value chain and are less leveraged than the enlarged Banijay.
Compared with these investment-grade names, Banijay's profile is
more consistent with a 'B' rating.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  - Combined group's revenue to reach just over EUR3 billion in
FY20 on a pro-forma basis and growing at a low-single-digit
percentage thereafter

  - EBITDA margin to increase from 11.6% by about 100bp during
2020-2022 (including synergies)

  - Acquisition-related integration costs estimated at about EUR60
million spread over 2020 and 2021

  - Fitch conservatively assumes run-rate synergies of about EUR40
million a year by 2022, compared with the management's target of
EUR60 million by 2022.

Key Recovery Rating Assumptions

  - Fitch uses a going-concern approach for the enlarged Banijay in
its recovery analysis, assuming that the company would be
considered a going-concern in the event of a bankruptcy

  - A 10% administrative claim

  - Post-restructuring going-concern EBITDA estimated at EUR265
million, 25% below its 2020 forecast EBITDA, reflecting distress
caused by loss of top shows

  - Fitch uses an enterprise value (EV) multiple of 5.5x to
calculate a post-restructuring valuation

  - Recovery prospects are 58% for the senior secured debt at
Banijay Entertainment, comprising EUR939 million equivalent of
notes and EUR869 million equivalent of term loan B. In its debt
claim waterfall, Fitch assumes EUR90 million of local facilities
issued by Banijay's non-guarantor subsidiaries and EUR61 million of
factoring rank prior to the senior secured debt. Ranking pari passu
to the senior secured notes and TLB, Fitch assumes a fully drawn
RCF of EUR170 million and EUR39 million of local facilities at
guarantor subsidiaries. EUR400 million of senior unsecured notes
issued by Banijay Group SAS have 0% recovery prospects.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  - FFO adjusted net leverage declining below 5.5x

  - Growth of EBITDA and FCF with continued demand for non-scripted
and scripted content without a significant increase in competitive
pressure

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  - FFO adjusted net leverage rising above 6.5x

  - FFO fixed-charge coverage sustained below 2.5x

  - Failure to renew leading shows and delays in increasing
distribution and secondary revenue

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Comfortable Liquidity: Fitch expects the enlarged Banijay to have
EUR110 million cash on balance sheet at end-2020. Together with
positive FCF generation and a EUR170 million RCF fully undrawn,
Fitch views the liquidity position of Banijay as comfortable.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or to the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.



=============
G E R M A N Y
=============

EO TELEVISION: Motorvision Group Takes Over Operation of eoTV
-------------------------------------------------------------
Broadband TV News reports that Motorvision Group has acquired TV
channel eoTV on Feb. 1, 2020, which will continue to be broadcast
as a free-to-air service in the German-speaking countries.

The channel, which launched in December 2015 under the motto
'European Originals', shows European series and films. In February
2019, operating company EO Television GmbH had to file for
insolvency.

According to the report, the new broadcaster of eoTV is MV
Sendebetriebsgesellschaft UG, a wholly-owned subsidiary of MV
International GmbH (Motorvision Group). As part of an asset deal,
the company will take over the brand rights, programme licences,
technical equipment and existing employees of the insolvent EO
Television. The channel will continue to be based in Munich.

Raimund Kohler, managing director of pay-TV broadcaster Motorvision
TV, will take over the management of the business, the report says.
Together with his team he wants to realign the programme structure
of eoTV in the coming months and expand it with additional
programme genres.

"In the past, Motorvision TV and eoTV have already cooperated
successfully and screened reports as well as racing series such as
the Isle of Man TT during the European Sportsnight," Broadband TV
News quotes Mr. Kohler as saying. "We want to build on this basis
and, together with our new colleagues from eoTV, offer viewers on
German free-TV an even greater variety of programmes. The
preparations are already in full swing."

Broadband TV News says the marketing of advertising time for eoTV
will be handled in-house with immediate effect under the leadership
of Andreas Schaefer, sales director of Motorvision Group.

Branded Motorvision.TV, Motorvision Group operates pay-TV channels
in Germany and over 100 countries in Europe, Africa and Asia. There
are no plans to change Motorvision.TV's distribution model,
according to the broadcaster, Broadband TV News adds.




=============
I R E L A N D
=============

SMURFIT KAPPA: Fitch Alters Outlook on BB+ LT IDR to Positive
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings revised the Outlook on Ireland-based packaging
company Smurfit Kappa Group plc's Long-Term Issuer Default Rating
to Positive from Stable and affirmed the IDR at 'BB+'. Fitch has
also affirmed the senior unsecured ratings of Smurfit Kappa
Acquisitions, Smurfit Kappa Treasury Funding and Smurfit Kappa
Treasury Unlimited Company at 'BB+'.

The revision of the Outlook reflects SKG's continued solid
financial and operating performance with EBITDA margin supported by
favorable market conditions and continued strong free cash flow
generation. It also reflects improving geographical diversification
beyond Europe, a stronghold of SKG, which continues to account for
more than 75% of its revenue, and its vertical integration into
containerboard. SKG's stable dividend policies, moderate leverage,
capex flexibility and the ability to generate positive free cash
flow (FCF) amid high capex also support the rating.

SKG is the European leader in paper-based packaging, including
corrugated, containerboard and bag-in-box. In 2019, it generated
EUR1,603 million in EBITDA.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Continued Margin Improvement: SKG continued to achieve revenue
growth in FY19 and has further improved its EBITDA margins to
around 17.7%. The improvement in the margins was mainly due to
favourable market conditions, as raw material prices were lower
than its expectations in 2019. A further positive impact came from
the recent acquisitions and growth capital expenditure both in
Europe and the Americas.

SKG passes through the costs of raw materials to the end-consumers
with a lag of around six months and therefore Fitch expects the
EBITDA margins to slightly decrease to just below 17% over
2020-2023. The pass-through mechanism is similar for all packaging
companies, although in some cases (mainly rigid plastic packaging)
the lag could be shorter than that of SKG.

Leading Packaging Company: SKG's ratings are supported by its
leading position in corrugated containers and exposure to the
broadly stable packaging markets. The credit profile is further
supported by SKG's vertical integration into containerboard,
providing some margin protection against raw material cost
inflation. In addition, around 60% of the group's revenue is
generated by customers in the fast-moving consumer goods sector,
which provides stability to SKG's financial performance.

Strong FCF Generation: Fitch views the stability of margins, stable
dividend policy and positive FCF generation as positive features of
SKG's credit profile. Despite a slight decrease in the EBITDA
margins and gradual increase in dividend payments, Fitch forecasts
SKG to continue generating positive FCF. This is further supported
by the expected reduction of capital expenditure from the
historical highs, as the company concludes its medium-term plan
adopted in 2018.

Positive FCF generation has resulted in SKG's FFO adjusted net
leverage improving to 2.6x in FY19 from 3.3x in FY16. Fitch expects
it to decrease to below its positive rating sensitivity of 2.5x by
2021-2022, which is one of the main drivers of the Outlook
revision.

Lack of FCF Volatility: Fitch views the very low volatility of
SKG's FCF margins to be highly supportive of the rating. The
company can reduce capex and manage working capital during
unfavourable market conditions. This is despite some volatility in
the EBITDA margins, which can be attributed to the lag in the raw
materials pass-through costs to the end-customer,

High Capital Intensity: Fitch views SKG's capital intensity, which
is calculated as capital expenditure to revenue, to be somewhat
higher than that of packaging peers and other sectors. However,
this is compensated by moderate dividend payments, which ensure SKG
can produce consistently strong FCF.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

SKG's ratings are supported by its leading packaging market
position, stable and diversified customer base, strong FCF
generation and sound liquidity. Its closest Fitch-rated peer is
Stora Enso Oyj (Stora; BBB-/Stable), which in its view has a
slightly better business profile due to the higher geographical
diversification and product mix, as well Fitch's expectations of
lower leverage, hence the one-notch difference in the ratings.

US-based packaging peers, such as Berry Global Group, Inc., Ball
Corporation (WD), Crown Holdings, Inc., although comparable in
size, operate in different packaging segments (plastic, bottle and
glass manufacturing, respectively) and can exhibit somewhat
different market dynamics and customer mix. The US-based packaging
companies' leverage is higher than that of SKG and Stora, which is
more consistent with non-investment grade ratings.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  - Low single-digit revenue growth over 2020-2023

  - EBITDA margin at around 16-17%

  - Dividend growth at around 15% annually

  - Net acquisitions around EUR150 million annually over 2021-2023

  - Capex around EUR550 million over 2020-2023

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  - Increased geographic and product diversification leading to
reduced business risk

  - FFO-adjusted net leverage sustainably below 2.5x

  - FCF margin sustainably above 2.5% (2019: 3.2%)

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  - Larger-than-expected acquisitions or increased shareholder
returns that result in FFO adjusted net leverage above 4.0x on a
sustained basis

  - FCF margin sustainably below 1%

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Strong Liquidity Position: At end-2019 SKG had EUR203 million in
cash and short-term deposits (of which Fitch views EUR110 million
as restricted for working-capital and other operational
requirements) and around EUR1 billion of undrawn committed credit
facilities, while short-term maturities stood at EUR118 million.
Expected positive FCF generation over the next 12 months should
also provide ample coverage for debt service.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

  - Restricted cash of EUR114 million for working capital and
operational needs.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

SKG has an ESG Relevance Score of 4 for Exposure to Social Impacts
due to consumer preference shift towards renewable packaging, which
has a positive impact on the credit profile, and is relevant to the
ratings in conjunction with other factors.



=========
I T A L Y
=========

A-BEST 14 SRL: Fitch Affirms Class E Debt at 'BBsf'
---------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Asset-Backed European Securitisation
Transaction Fourteen S.r.l., as follows:

Asset-Backed European Securitisation Transaction Fourteen S.r.l.
(A-Best 14)
   
  - Class A IT0005187072; LT AAsf Affirmed

  - Class B IT0005187080; LT Asf Affirmed

  - Class C IT0005187098; LT BBB+sf Affirmed
  
  - Commingling Facility; LT BBB+sf Affirmed
  
  - Class D IT0005187106; LT BB+sf Affirmed

  - Class E IT0005329708; LT BBsf Affirmed  

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

The notes are backed by a pool of Italian auto loan receivables
originated and serviced by FCA Bank S.p.A. (FCAB, BBB+/Stable/F1).

The transaction originally closed in May 2016. It was first
restructured in November 2016 and then in April 2018. It is a
revolving securitisation of fixed-rate auto loans advanced to
Italian borrowers, including VAT individuals (ie professionals and
artisans). The revolving period is scheduled to end on the May 2020
payment date.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Transaction Still Replenishing

The deal is in the final stage of its revolving period. As a
result, credit enhancement for the rated notes is unchanged. As of
January 2020, the portfolio composition was broadly in line with
the restructuring of April 2018. Used cars account for 15% of the
portfolio and VAT borrowers for 19% compared with the maximum
allowed limit of 16% and 20%, respectively, while the share of
southern debtors is 30%, below the covenanted 35%. However, given
that migration to a different pool mix is possible until the end of
the revolving period, Fitch has maintained its default and recovery
assumptions.

Asset Performance Within Expectations

As of January 2020, cumulative defaults were 0.3% of the cumulative
purchased assets since closing in 2016. Loans in arrears for 30
days or more are still at very low levels (0.4%), despite being on
an increasing trend since the last restructuring in April 2018.

Ratings Capped at 'AAsf'

The class A notes are rated 'AAsf', the maximum achievable rating
for Italian structured finance transactions, six notches above
Italy's Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR; BBB/Negative/F2).The
Outlook on the class A notes mirrors that on the sovereign.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

These rating sensitivities are as of the latest run of the
cash-flow analysis, dated April 2018.

Rating sensitivities to increased default rate assumptions (class A
/ B / C / D / E):

  - Current rating: 'AAsf' / 'Asf' / 'BBB+sf' / 'BB+sf' / 'BBsf'

  - Increase in default rate by 10%: 'AA-sf' / 'A-sf' / 'BBBsf' /
'BB+sf' / 'BB-sf'

  - Increase in default rate by 25%: 'A+sf' / 'BBB+sf' / 'BBB-sf' /
'BBsf' / 'B+sf'

  - Increase in default rate by 50%: 'A-sf' / 'BBBsf' / 'BB+sf' /
'B+sf' / 'Bsf'

Rating sensitivities to reduced recovery rate assumptions (class A
/ B / C / D / E):

  - Current rating: 'AAsf' / 'Asf' / 'BBB+sf' / 'BB+sf' / 'BBsf'

  - Decrease in recovery rate by 10%: 'AAsf' / 'Asf' / 'BBB+sf' /
'BB+sf' / 'BBsf'

  - Decrease in recovery rate by 25%: 'AAsf' / 'Asf' / 'BBB+sf' /
'BB+sf' / 'BB-sf'
  
  - Decrease in recovery rate by 50%: 'AA-sf' / 'Asf' / 'BBB+sf' /
'BB+sf' / 'BB-sf'

Rating sensitivities to multiple factors (class A / B / C / D /
E):

  - Current rating: 'AAsf' / 'Asf' / 'BBB+sf' / 'BB+sf' / 'BBsf'
  
  - Increase in default rate and decrease in recovery rate by 10%:
'AA-sf' / 'A-sf' / 'BBBsf' / 'BB+sf' / 'BB-sf'

  - Increase in default rate and decrease in recovery rate by 25%:
'Asf' / 'BBB+sf' / 'BBB-sf' / 'BB-sf' / 'B+sf'

  - Increase in default rate and decrease in recovery rate by 50%:
'BBB+sf' / 'BBB-sf' / 'BBsf' / 'B+sf' / Not Rateable ('NRsf')

Rating Sensitivity for the Commingling Reserve Facility (CRF)

The CRF rating is the lower of FCAB's IDR, the account bank's IDR
(Elavon Financial Services DAC, AA-/Stable) and the maximum
achievable rating to ensure timely payment of interest due on the
CRF. As such, any change in the relevant counterparty's IDR as well
as any significant improvement or deterioration of the portfolio
performance beyond expectations may trigger a downgrade or upgrade
of the CRF rating.

CRITERIA VARIATION

Under its Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria, Fitch foresees
that certain structured finance transactions which are dependent on
the credit quality of an underlying entity may be credit-linked to
those entities. However, the issuer's ability to repay the
commingling facility depends on a combination ('weakest link') of
counterparty (ie, the exposure towards FCAB and the account bank)
and portfolio risk (cash flows deriving from the securitised pool
for the interest payments) rather than any of the two separately.
The assessment of the two risks combined is a criteria variation
that the agency deemed necessary to properly address credit
characteristics of the commingling facility. Without this criteria
variation, Fitch could have not rated the commingling reserve
facility loan.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by,
Fitch in relation to this rating action.

DATA ADEQUACY

Fitch has checked the consistency and plausibility of the
information it has received about the asset pool and the
transaction. There were no findings that affected the rating
analysis. Fitch has not reviewed the results of any third party
assessment of the asset portfolio information or conducted a review
of origination files as part of its ongoing monitoring.

Prior to the transaction closing, Fitch reviewed the results of a
third party assessment conducted on the asset portfolio information
and concluded that there were no findings that affected the rating
analysis.

Prior to the (first) transaction restructuring, Fitch conducted a
review of a small targeted sample of the origination files and
found the information contained in the reviewed files to be
adequately consistent with the originator's policies and practices
and the other information provided to the agency about the asset
portfolio.

Overall, Fitch's assessment of the asset pool information relied
upon for the agency's rating analysis according to its applicable
rating methodologies indicates that it is adequately reliable.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of 3. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the
transaction, either due to their nature or to the way in which they
are being managed by the transaction.


MOBY SPA: Reaches Deal with Bondholders to Delay Interest Payment
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Antonio Vanuzzo at Bloomberg News reports that Italian ferry
operator Moby SpA reached an agreement with a group of bondholders
to delay a EUR12 million (US$13 million) interest payment while it
negotiates a debt restructuring.

The company said in an emailed statement the moratorium is valid
until the end of the month, Bloomberg relates.

According to Bloomberg, Moby also asked for a standstill on
amortization payments due mid February related to EUR260 million of
loans.

Moby, which links Sardinia and Sicily with Italy's mainland, has
been in talks with creditors for months as it's struggling amid
increasing regulation, tougher competition and weak freight traffic
volumes, Bloomberg discloses.

The ferry operator fended off an attempt by hedge funds holding its
bonds to have it declared insolvent, Bloomberg relays.  The funds
filed an insolvency petition with a Milan court in September,
seeking to prevent Moby selling ships pledged as guarantees on
debt, Bloomberg recounts.  The court rejected the  request in
October but urged Moby to take action in boosting its financial
strength, according to Bloomberg.

In November, the company hired PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to draw
up proposals for reducing indebtedness, people familiar with the
matter said at the time, Bloomberg notes.


MOBY SPA: S&P Cuts ICR to 'SD' on Announced Standstill Agreement
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term issuer credit rating on
Moby SpA to 'SD' from 'CCC-' and its issue ratings on the company's
senior secured debt to 'D' from 'CCC'.

The downgrade follows Moby's announcement of a standstill agreement
with an ad-hoc group of bondholders and a further standstill
request to SFA lenders. Moby decided to defer payments on its
EUR300 million notes due 2023 and EUR200 million term loan and
EUR60 million revolving credit facilities due 2021, which we now
rate 'D'. The recovery rating on these obligations remains
unchanged at '2' and continues to reflect our expectation of
material (85%) recovery in the event of a conventional default.




===================
L U X E M B O U R G
===================

SK INVICTUS II: Moody's Lowers CFR to B3, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded SK Invictus Intermediate II
S.a.r.l.'s Corporate Family Rating to B3 from B2 and Probability of
Default Rating to B3-PD from B2-PD. Moody's also downgraded SK
Invictus Intermediate II S.a.r.l.'s first lien senior secured
credit facility to B2 from B1 and second lien senior secured term
loan to Caa2 from Caa1. The outlook is stable.

"The downgrade reflects significantly elevated leverage and lack of
free cash flow generation despite relatively strong margins and
attractive market positions in both the Fire Safety and Oil
Additives businesses" said Domenick R. Fumai, Moody's Vice
President and lead analyst for SK Invictus Intermediate II
S.a.r.l.

Downgrades:

Issuer: SK Invictus Intermediate II S.a.r.l.

Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to B3-PD from B2-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to B3 from B2

Senior Secured 1st Lien Bank Credit Facility, Downgraded to B2
(LGD3) from B1 (LGD3)

Senior Secured 2nd Lien Bank Credit Facility, Downgraded to Caa2
(LGD6) from Caa1 (LGD6)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: SK Invictus Intermediate II S.a.r.l.

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Perimeter Solutions' B3 CFR rating is constrained by a substantial
increase in leverage over the last year due to significant
underperformance in its Fire Safety business as a result of slower
wildfire activity in California and softness in the company's Oil
Additives segment due to production issues at one customer, lower
industry volumes, as well as the impact of trade tariffs that
resulted in much lower EBITDA and free cash flow generation versus
Moody's expectations. Perimeter Solutions also increased balance
sheet debt by using its revolving credit facility and an
incremental first lien term loan to finance several acquisitions,
including First Response in 2019. Although Moody's expects 4Q19
financial results to demonstrate improvement due to increased
wildfire activity in Kincade, California and Australia, as well as
more normalized earnings in the Oil Additives segment, Moody's
nonetheless estimates Total Debt/EBITDA of approximately 10.0x for
fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. The rating also incorporates
the company's lack of scale and limited product diversity, with a
substantial portion of earnings attributed to the Fire Safety
segment, which is affected by the uncertainty of natural disasters.
Private equity ownership and associated governance risk is another
factor constraining the rating.

Perimeter Solutions rating is supported by strong industry
positions in both of its segments. Fire Safety's Phos-Chek®,
Fire-Trol® and Auxquimia® brands hold leading market shares.
Perimeter Solutions is the sole supplier of fire retardants to the
US government and a leading supplier to key state and municipal
fire agencies as well as Canadian provinces. In the Oil Additives
segment, Perimeter Solutions benefits from an industry which has a
limited number of suppliers and the company's position as the only
supplier with operations in both North America and Europe. Both
segments are characterized by high barriers to entry including
extensive qualification requirements, require highly specialized
formulations and have long-term customer relationships.

Moody's also considers environmental, social and governance factors
in the rating. As a specialty chemicals company, environmental
risks are categorized as moderate. However, several of Perimeter
Solutions' products may result in significant future risks.
Phosphorous pentasulfide (P2S5) used in the preparation of oil
additives is extremely reactive and is classified as an explosion
hazard. Perimeter Solutions, which also manufactures Class B
firefighting foams, states it is not currently involved in any
litigation related to PFAS. However, given the stability of the
fluorine-based products utilized, Moody's will actively monitor
this risk as any litigation could be material to the company's
financial status. Nonetheless, its aerial fire retardants are
important products in fighting and containing large wildfires to
limit personal injury of both inhabitants and firefighting
personnel in the surrounding areas, confine property damage and
minimize destruction of the environment. Governance risks are
above-average due to the risks associated with private equity
ownership, which include a limited number of independent directors
on the board, reduced financial disclosure requirements as a
private company and more aggressive financial policies compared to
most public companies.

The stable outlook assumes that Perimeter Solutions will preserve
sufficient liquidity to maintain current operations, that Fire
Safety experiences a return towards a more typical wildfire season
in the US, incremental volume from the Australian wildfires and
financial results in the Oil Additives segment are more
commensurate with historical performance, thereby restoring
consolidated EBITDA growth and positive free cash flow generation.
Under this scenario, Moody's expects Total Debt/EBITDA to improve
in FY 2020 towards mid-7x as the company is able to generate over
$10 million in free cash flow and reduce outstanding borrowings on
the revolving credit facility.

Moody's would likely consider a downgrade if adjusted leverage is
sustained above 8.0x, free cash flow remains negative for a
sustained period of time, or available liquidity falls below $20
million. Although unlikely in the medium-term, Moody's could
upgrade the ratings if adjusted leverage is below 6.0x on a
sustained basis in a weak wildfire season, if free cash
flow-to-debt is sustained above 5%, and the sponsor commits to more
conservative financial policies.

Liquidity is adequate with modest cash balances, expectations for
positive free cash flow generation in 2020 and limited availability
under its revolving credit facility until leverage per the credit
facility calculation falls below 8.0x. The credit agreement for the
revolving credit facility contains a springing first lien net
leverage ratio covenant that is triggered if revolver borrowings
exceed $35 million. Moody's does not expect that the covenant will
be triggered in 2020. The first and second lien senior secured term
loans do not contain financial maintenance covenants.

Debt capital is comprised of a $100 million first lien senior
secured revolving credit facility, approximately $553 million first
lien senior secured term loan B, and a $170 million second lien
senior secured term loan. The B2 ratings on the first lien senior
secured credit facilities, one notch above the B3 CFR, reflect a
first lien position on substantially all assets. The Caa2 rating on
the second lien term loan, two notches below the B3 CFR, reflects
the preponderance of first lien credit facilities in the capital
structure.

Perimeter Solutions is a specialty chemical producer operating in
two segments: Fire Safety and Oil Additives. The fire safety
business involves formulating and manufacturing fire safety
chemicals, including Phos-Chek® fire retardants, Class A and B
foams, and water enhancing gels for wildland, military, industrial,
and municipal fires. The oil additives business produces phosphorus
pentasulfide used in the preparation of ZDDP-based lubricant
additives used for anti-wear properties in engine oils and to
prolong the useful life of engines. Perimeter Solutions was
acquired by private equity firm, SK Capital Partners, through a
carve-out from Israel Chemicals, Ltd. in 2018

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Chemical
Industry published in March 2019.




===========
N O R W A Y
===========

ENDUR ENERGY: Board Opts to File Bankruptcy Petition
----------------------------------------------------
Hari Govind at Bloomberg News reports that Endur Energy Solutions
said the company's board concluded there is no longer any basis for
continued operations and resolved a petition for bankruptcy.

According to Bloomberg, the company said the petition will now be
filed with Stavanger Tingrett.

Significant deterioration in operating results during the fourth
quarter made finding an alternative solution difficult.

Based in Norway, Endur Energy Solutions provides maintenance,
modification, construction, installation, fabrication and
conversion of oil and gas installations both onshore and offshore
sectors.




===========
R U S S I A
===========

YAROSLAVL REGION: Fitch Upgrades LT IDRs to BB, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings upgraded the Russian Yaroslavl Region's Long-Term
Foreign- and Local-Currency Issuer Default Ratings to 'BB' from
'BB-'. The Outlook is Stable. The upgrade follows a re-assessment
of the region's risk profile to 'Low Midrange' from 'Weaker'.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Fitch has re-assessed Yaroslavl's risk profile to 'Low Midrange'
from 'Weaker', following the revision of the region's revenue
robustness attribute to 'Midrange' from 'Weaker'.

Revenue Robustness: Midrange

A combination of a strong regional economy in the Russian context
and low concentration on volatile economic sectors supported its
re-assessment of the attribute to 'Midrange'. This also reflects
increasing stability of the region's revenue proceeds during the
last four years and gradual improvement of the region's
revenue-generating capacity following stabilisation of the local
economy. Yaroslavl's economy was strong in the Russian context with
per capita GRP at 108% of the national median (2017). The economic
profile of the region is diversified with a developed industrial
sector, which leads to overall low volatility of tax proceeds.

The region managed to shrink the budget deficit to 1%-2% of total
revenue during 2017-2019 from a large average deficit of 8.4% in
2014-2016. Fitch expects Yaroslavl to maintain a prudent approach
in managing its finances in the medium term.

Revenue Adjustability: Weaker

Fitch assesses Yaroslavl's ability to generate additional revenue
in response to possible economic downturns as limited. The federal
government in Russia holds significant tax-setting authority, which
limits local and regional governments' (LRG) fiscal autonomy and
revenue adjustability. The regional governments have rate-setting
power only over three regional taxes: corporate property tax,
transport tax and gambling tax, albeit with limits set in the
National Tax Code. The proportion of these taxes was about 10% of
Yaroslavl's total revenue in 2019.

Expenditure Sustainability: Midrange

Yaroslavl's administration exercises prudent control over
expenditure, as spending growth has closely followed that of
revenue in 2014-2018. Like other Russian regions, Yaroslavl has
responsibilities in education, healthcare, provision of some types
of social benefits, public transportation and road construction. In
line with other Russian regions, Yaroslavl is not required to adopt
anti-cyclical measures, which would inflate expenditure on social
benefits in a downturn. At the same time, Russian regions' budgets
are subject to the discretion of the federal authorities, which
could lead to acceleration of expenditure.

Expenditure Adjustability: Weaker

Like most Russian regions, Fitch assesses Yaroslval's expenditure
adjustability as low. The majority of spending responsibilities are
mandatory for Russian subnationals; this leaves little room for
Yaroslavl to manoeuvre in response to potential revenue shortfalls.
Yaroslavl's flexibility to cut capex is also limited, particularly
by the low proportion of capex, which averaged 8.3% in 2014-2018.
Additionally, the region's ability to cut expenditure is
constrained by the low level of per capita expenditure compared
with international peers'.

Liabilities and Liquidity Robustness: Midrange

The assessment is supported by a national budgetary framework with
strict rules on regional debt management. Russian LRGs are subject
to debt stock limits and new borrowing restrictions as well as
limits on annual interest payments. Use of derivatives is
prohibited for LRGs in Russia. Limitations on external debt are
very strict and in practice no Russian region borrows externally.

Liabilities and Liquidity Flexibility: Midrange

The region's liquidity is supported by federal treasury loans
covering intra-year cash gaps. Fitch assesses Yaroslavl's access to
domestic capital market as reasonable allowing the region to borrow
in case of need, as evidenced by its record of domestic bond
issues. Nonetheless, as the counterparty risk associated with
domestic liquidity providers is rated 'BBB', Fitch assesses this
risk factor as 'Midrange'.

Debt Sustainability Assessment: 'a'

Under its Rating Criteria for International Local and Regional
Governments, Fitch classifies Yaroslavl, like other Russian LRGs,
as a Type B LRG, due to debt service from cash flow on an annual
basis. The assessment of debt sustainability is driven by a debt
payback ratio (net adjusted debt/operating balance), of 9x and 13x
under Fitch rating case over the five-year forecast period.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Fitch re-assessed Yaroslavl's standalone credit profile (SCP) as
'bb-' from 'b+', following its re-assessment of the region's risk
profile to 'Low Midrange' from 'Weaker', combined with an unchanged
'a' debt sustainability. The SCP also reflects comparison with
Yaroslavl's peers.

Fitch continues to apply a single-notch upward adjustment for
potential extraordinary support in the form of ad-hoc
intergovernmental loans from the federal government, based on past
support. In Fitch's view such ad-hoc support would be provided at
the discretion of the federal government.

The region's IDRs are upgraded to 'BB' from 'BB-'.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Qualitative assumptions and assessments and their respective weight
in the rating decision:

Risk Profile: Low Midrange, high weight

Revenue Robustness: Midrange, high weight

Revenue Adjustability: Weaker, medium weight

Expenditure Sustainability: Midrange, medium weight

Expenditure Adjustability: Weaker, medium weight

Liabilities and Liquidity Robustness: Midrange, medium weight

Liabilities and Liquidity Flexibility: Midrange, medium weight

Debt sustainability: 'a' category, medium weight

Extraordinary Support: +1 notch, medium weight

Asymmetric Risk: n/a

Fitch's rating case scenario is a "through-the-cycle" scenario,
which incorporates a combination of revenue, cost and financial
risk stresses. It is based on the 2014-2018 figures and 2019-2023
projected ratios.

The key assumptions for the scenario include:

  - 2019 revenue outturn close to the region's budget

  - Tax revenue to grow in line with the local economy's nominal
growth in 2020-2023

  - Operating expenditure growth in line with inflation

  - Capex to average 8.5% of the region's total expenditure over
2020-2023

Fitch's rating case envisages the following stress compared with
the base case:

  - Annual 4.7% increase in operating revenue on average in
2019-2023, including 4.9% increase in taxes, 3.9% increase in
non-tax revenue and 4% increase in current transfers;

  - Annual 7% increase in operating spending on average in
2019-2023;

Figures as per Fitch's sovereign actual for 2018 and forecast for
2020, respectively:

  - GDP per capita (US dollar, market exchange rate): 11,291.4 and
12,260

  - Real GDP growth (%): 2.3 and 2

  - Consumer prices (annual average % change): 2.9 and 3.3

  - General government balance (% of GDP): 2.9 and 0.9

  - General government debt (% of GDP): 14.6 and 15.9

  - Current account balance plus net FDI (% of GDP): 5.5 and 2.8

  - Net external debt (% of GDP): -32.8 and -36.3

  - IMF Development Classification: EM

  - CDS Market-Implied Rating: n/a

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Sustainable improvement in debt payback towards 11 years debt
service coverage above 1x according to Fitch's rating case could
lead to an upgrade.

Deterioration of the region's fiscal debt payback to beyond 13x
during most of the forecast period under Fitch's rating case or
change in Fitch's expectation of ad-hoc support by central
government could lead to a downgrade.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Yaroslavl's debt policy is aimed at maintaining manageable debt at
affordable costs of debt servicing. In 2019, the region's debt was
largely stable at RUB37.5 billion, which was below 60% of current
revenue -a moderate fiscal debt burden from international
perspective. The region's life of debt runs till 2034, while 88% of
the debt stock is scheduled to mature in 2020-2025. As of end-2019,
the debt stock was split between domestic bonds (52%)
inter-governmental loans (37%), and bank loans (11%). The region's
contingent's liabilities are low and well-controlled.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

ESG credit relevance is a score of 3. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or to the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.




===========
T U R K E Y
===========

ATLASJET HAVACILIK: Applies for Bankruptcy
------------------------------------------
According to Bloomberg News' Taylan Bilgic, Atlasjet Havacilik AS
has applied for bankruptcy, Milliyet newspaper reports on its
website, citing the company's corporate communications department.

Headquartered in Istanbul, Turkey, Atlasjet Havacilik AS provides
scheduled flights for passengers and cargo.




=============
U K R A I N E
=============

[*] UKRAINE: Creditors of Insolvent Banks Get Over UAH10BB in 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------
Interfax Ukraine reports that claims of creditors of insolvent
banks in the amount of UAH10.135 billion were paid in 2019, the
Deposit Guarantee Fund has said on its website.

According to the report, UAH12.99 million was received by
second-level priority tier creditors, UAH4406.66 million by
third-level priority tier creditors, UAH248.02 million by
fourth-level priority tier creditors, UAH173.15 million by
fifth-level priority tier creditors, UAH0.001 million by
sixth-level priority tier creditors, UAH3.853 billion by
seventh-level priority tier creditors, UAH43.44 million by
eighth-level priority tier creditors, UAH298.13 million by
ninth-level priority tier creditors, UAH99.59 million and by
tenth-level priority tier creditors.

Of the total amount of payments UAH3.369 billion were allocated for
early payments on claims of secured creditors, including UAH3.104
billion to the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU), the news agency
discloses.

In order to meet the claims of secured creditors in December 2019,
UAH222.35 million was sent, including UAH209.21 million to the NBU.
Early payments by the NBU were made by Finance and Credit Bank -
UAH158.58 million, Delta Bank - UAH46.27 million, Nadra Bank -
UAH1.78 million, VAB Bank - UAH1.36 million, Kyivska Rus Bank -
UAH1.12 million, Rodovid Bank - UAH0.08 million, and Bank Cambio -
UAH0.02 million, according to Interfax Ukraine.

The total amount of claims of creditors of insolvent banks
satisfied over the entire period as of January 1, 2020 amounted to
UAH44.675 billion, of which UAH11.501 billion was paid to secured
creditors, including UAH10.408 billion to the NBU, the report
notes.




===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================

FAMILY DOCTOR: To Close Following 'Financial Viability' Concerns
----------------------------------------------------------------
Eleanor Philpotts at Pulse Today reports that the Family Doctor
Association, representing small GP practices, has announced it is
to close because it is 'not a financially viable entity in the long
term'.

Pulse Today says the membership organisation, which has supported
grassroots GPs and practices since 1985, said dwindling income from
members - due to increasing number of GPs retiring and practices
closing - was to blame.

It said there was a risk the charitable organisation would become
insolvent later this year and so it agreed at a meeting last month
to wind up the organisation, a decision that will be formally
ratified in March, according to Pulse Today.

Pulse Today relates that in a statement issued by Family Doctor
Association chairman and trustee Dr Peter Swinyard on Feb. 4, he
described the association's 'deepest regret' at having to close and
not being a 'financially viable entity in the long term'.

"This decision was not made lightly. It is the duty of the charity
trustees to ensure financial balance and probity; it is clear that,
while not insolvent yet, there is risk we would become so later
this year," said the statement, co-written by Dr Swinyard, vice
chairman and trustee Dr Claire Rushton, treasurer and trustee Dr
Rauf Kukaswadia, and trustee Dr Michael Taylor, Pulse Today
relays.

The four GPs said there had been a 'disappointing response' to
raising subscription fees last year.

They said: 'Traditionally, as a membership organisation, the bulk
of our income has been from member subscriptions, topped up with
commercial sponsors and some income from educational meetings.

'These sources are drying up as the membership demographic shows
increasing numbers of retirements and practice amalgamations and
closures,' Pulse Today relays.

The Family Doctor Association grew from its origins as the Small
Practices Association, largely under the 26-year leadership of
chief executive Moira Auchterlonie, who was praised by the trustees
for her 'energy, enthusiasm and amazing abilities'.


INVERCLYDE & NORTH: CSN Care Takes Over Business, 200 Jobs Saved
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hamish Burns at insider.co.uk, citing Scottish Business Insider,
reports that two care sector investors have stepped in to take over
Greenock-based service provider Inverclyde & North Ayrshire Care
Services (INACS), which went into liquidation.

Scott Christie and Craig Hendry are directors of Glasgow-based CSN
Care Group, which has taken on the business of INACS, insider.co.uk
discloses.

Begbies Traynor in Glasgow was appointed as provisional liquidator
"following a period of adverse trading and a deteriorating
financial position", insider.co.uk relates.  It said all 200 staff
had been retained and that continuity of care had been secured for
the care provider's customers, insider.co.uk notes.

According to insider.co.uk, joint provisional liquidator Ken
Pattullo said: "While it is very sad to see the demise of INACS, it
is good news that CSN Care Group has been able to take over its
operations, securing the jobs of 200 employees and the continued
care of hundreds of vulnerable people across the region."


LAURA ASHLEY: Scrambles to Secure More Funding After Sales Slump
----------------------------------------------------------------
Simon Foy at The Telegraph reports that fears are growing for the
future of Laura Ashley as it scrambles to secure more funding after
another slide in sales.

According to The Telegraph, the struggling retailer's majority
shareholder MUI Asia and US bank Wells Fargo are in talks about a
possible cash injection to keep the fashion and home furnishings
business afloat amid a crisis on the high street.

Sales fell to GBP109.6 million in the last half of 2019, down 11%
on a year earlier, The Telegraph discloses.  Laura Ashley blamed
the drop in part on weaker consumer spending, and said all options
are now on the table in a battle for survival, The Telegraph
relates.

Shares plunged 42pc, valuing Laura Ashley at less than GBP14
million, The Telegraph notes.  The stock has fallen more than 90%
since Laura Ashley's heyday as a trend-setter in the mid-1990s, The
Telegraph states.


LENDY LTD: Investors Crowdfund Legal Challenge to Administrators
----------------------------------------------------------------
James Hurley at The Times reports that people who lent money via a
failed peer-to-peer platform have turned to crowdfunding to finance
a legal challenge to what they believe is the "injustice" of how
the insolvency is being handled.

According to The Times, representatives of investors are seeking
advice on how they can oppose administrators' plans for the
distribution of recoveries from the estate of Lendy, which
collapsed last May.

The Times relate that administrators from RSM Restructuring concede
that their approach appears to conflict with what Lendy told
investors when it took their money, but they argue that their hands
are tied by how the company's directors structured loans.

Lendy, authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority, began to
crowd-source funds from retail investors to write secured loans to
property developers in 2014.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter-Europe on May 28,
2019, Business Sale said Lendy Limited collapsed into
administration following a steep decline in buyer demand and as a
result of severe cash flow difficulties.  The company, a P2P
lending marketplace, was forced to call in professional insolvency
specialists RSM Restructuring Advisory LLP to handle the
administration, with partners Damian Webb, Phillip Rodney Sykes and
Mark John Wilson appointed as joint administrators. The
administrators, however, were also appointed for two further
unregulated firms, Lendy Provision Reserve Limited, and Saving
Stream Security Holding Limited, Business Sale said.


NORTHERN POWERHOUSE: Receives Offers for Three North Wales Hotels
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Owen Hughes at NorthWalesLive reports that offers have been made
for three North Wales hotels that have been in administration for
several months.

Gavin Woodhouse's company Northern Powerhouse Development (NPD) saw
its hotels in Llandudno and the Conwy Valley go into the hands of
administrators Duff & Phelps last summer, NorthWalesLive relates.

It followed a probe into the finances of NPD's hotel chain,
NorthWalesLive notes.

The seaside resort hotels Llandudno Bay Hotel, Queens Hotel and The
Belmont Hotel in Llandudno have continued to trade while Caer Rhun
Hall near Ty'n-y-Groes closed after Christmas, NorthWalesLive
recounts.

Now administrators have confirmed that they have received offers
for the three Llandudno sites, NorthWalesLive discloses.

Negotiations are now taking place with the hope deals can get over
the line before the season gets into full swing this spring,
NorthWalesLive states.


REDWOOD BUSINESS: Court Winds Up Debt Collection Company
--------------------------------------------------------
Redwood Business Management Ltd, based in Newcastle upon Tyne was
wound-up in the public interest on Feb. 3, 2020 at the High Court
in Manchester before Deputy District Judge Brightwell. The Official
Receiver has been appointed liquidator of the company.

The court heard that Redwood Business Management was incorporated
in June 2017 with registered offices in Shieldfield, Newcastle Upon
Tyne.

The Insolvency Service became aware of concerns regarding Redwood
Business Management's trading activities and instigated
confidential enquiries.

Investigators established that the company, trading under the name
'Rojen Recovery Services', had cold-called prospective clients
offering to collect outstanding debts that were due to them.

The company charged a fee of 18.5% of the outstanding debt, with
that fee supposedly being added to the amount that Redwood would
recover from the debtor.

Almost GBP1 million was paid into Redwood Business Management's
bank account between June 2017 and August 2019. This was made up of
recoveries made by Redwood Business Management from debtors, as
well as payments from clients for court fees and other charges
which, Redwood Business Management claimed, were necessary to
pursue recovery claims on behalf of the clients concerned.

While the accounting records of Redwood Business Management were
not sufficient to properly account for the monies received by the
company, investigators were able to establish that Redwood had
collected debts that had not been paid over to its clients.

The court wound-up the company on the ground that it traded with a
lack of commercial probity because it made false and misleading
statements to its clients, failed to account for monies collected
on behalf of clients, charged fees to clients in circumstances
where no such fees were due and charged excessive fees to clients.

The court also accepted that the company, and the individuals in
control of it, failed to cooperate fully with the investigation and
failed to keep adequate accounting records.

David Hope, Chief Investigator for the Insolvency Service, said:
"Redwood Business Management operated in a cynical manner
throughout its trading history. It charged clients substantial fees
for services that were not required or not provided and at the same
time, collected debts that it did not pay on to its clients.
Thankfully, the court has now put a stop to the company's
activities, preventing further harm."

All public enquiries concerning the affairs of the company should
be made to:

          The Official Receiver
          Public Interest Unit
          2 Floor, 3 Piccadilly Place
          London Road, Manchester, M1 3BN
          Email: piu.north@insolvency.gsi.gov.uk


TOWD POINT 2020-AUBURN 14: Fitch Assigns CC Rating on Cl. E Debt
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings assigned Towd Point Mortgage Funding 2020 - Auburn 14
final ratings as follows.

RATING ACTIONS

Towd Point Mortgage Funding 2020 - Auburn 14

Cl. A XS2109385679;  LT AAAsf New Rating; previously at AAA(EXP)sf


Cl. B XS2109385836;  LT AAsf New Rating;  previously at AA(EXP)sf

Cl. C XS2109386057;  LT Asf New Rating;   previously at A(EXP)sf

Cl. D XS2109386214;  LT BB+sf New Rating; previously at BB+(EXP)sf


Cl. E XS2109386487;  LT Bsf New Rating;   previously at B(EXP)sf

Cl. XA XS2109387378; LT CCsf New Rating;  previously at CC(EXP)sf

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

This transaction is a securitisation of buy-to-let (BTL) and
owner-occupied (OO) residential mortgage assets originated by
Capital Home Loans Limited (CHL) and secured against properties in
England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. The assets were
previously securitised in TPMF 2017 - Auburn 11 plc.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Seasoned Loans: The portfolio consists of 13-year seasoned loans
originated by CHL, of which 93.3% (by current balance) are BTL
loans that have performed in line with other UK BTL pools. When
setting the originator adjustment for the portfolio, Fitch took
into account the historical performance of the TPMF 2017 - Auburn
11 plc transaction and the short remaining term of the loans. This
resulted in an originator adjustment of 1.0x.

Low Prepayments: All loans in the portfolio have exceeded the
mortgages' reversion dates, thus they currently pay variable rates.
The weighted average (WA) margin of these loans is relatively low
at 1.3%. Refinancing incentives for these borrowers are very
limited at the current UK BTL market conditions; therefore Fitch
expects low prepayments rates.

Interest-Only Concentration: The BTL proportion has a material
concentration of interest-only (IO) loans maturing within a
three-year period during the lifetime of the transaction, peaking
at 49.4% between 2031 and 2033. Where a concentration is present,
Fitch derives an IO concentration WA foreclosure frequency (FF) and
applies in its the analysis the higher of this WAFF and the
standard portfolio WAFF for each rating level. For the BTL pool,
Fitch has applied the FF based on the IO concentration WAFF.

Low Margins, Favourable Affordability: 99.8% of the loans track the
Bank of England base rate (BBR). The WA margin of these loans is
relatively low at 1.3%. This results in a relatively high interest
coverage ratio of 135.6% for the BTL pool and a low debt-to-income
of 20.6% for the OO pool, implying higher affordability for
borrowers and therefore lower FF assumptions.

Unhedged Basis Risk: As the notes pay daily compounded SONIA the
transaction is exposed to basis risk between BBR and SONIA. Fitch
stressed the transaction cash flows for basis risk, in line with
its criteria. Combined with the low asset margins, this resulted in
limited excess spread in Fitch's cash flow analysis.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Material increases in the frequency of defaults and loss severity
on defaulted receivables producing losses greater than Fitch's base
case expectations may result in negative rating action on the
notes. Fitch's analysis revealed that a 30% increase in the WAFF,
along with a 30% decrease in the WA recovery rate, would imply a
downgrade of the class A notes to 'A+'sf from 'AAA'sf.

CRITERIA VARIATION

Under the UK RMBS Rating Criteria, loan margins and rates will be
input into the multi-asset cash flow model on a bucketed basis
where the portfolio contains wide dispersion in margins and rates.
The cash flow model will apply a yield compression over time by
application of 100% of defaults and 80% of prepayments to the
receivables within the higher-yielding buckets.

These legacy loans (originated between 2005 and 2008) have exceeded
the mortgages' fixed rate reversion dates, and as such are paying a
variable rate. The WA margin of these loans is fairly low at 1.3%
meaning that borrowers within this portfolio have no incentives to
refinance, given the product offerings currently available for BTL
loans.

Additionally, as the assets were previously securitised in the TPMF
2017 - Auburn 11 plc transaction, Fitch analysed the historical WA
margins over the Bank of England Base Rate of the securitised
portfolio, which showed to be stable since closing. Along with
Fitch's expectations of low prepayments rates, this led to no yield
compression applied to voluntary prepayments in the agency's cash
flow analysis.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by,
Fitch in relation to this rating action.

TOWD POINT 2020-AUBURN: S&P Rates Class XA Notes 'B'
----------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings has assigned credit ratings to Towd Point
Mortgage Funding 2020 - Auburn 14 PLC's (Towd Point's) class A,
B-Dfrd, C-Dfrd, D-Dfrd, E-Dfrd, and XA-Dfrd notes. At closing, Towd
Point also issued unrated class Z1 and Z2 notes and XB
certificates.

S&P based its credit analysis on a pool of GBP847.623 million (as
of Jan. 31, 2020). The pool comprises mainly first-lien U.K.
buy-to-let residential mortgage loans that Capital Home Loans Ltd.
(CHL) originated.

CHL is the servicer. The backup servicer is Homeloan Management
Ltd.

S&P said, "We rate the class A notes based on the payment of timely
interest. Interest on the class A notes is equal to the daily
compounded Sterling overnight index average (SONIA) plus a
class-specific margin.

"We treat the class B-Dfrd, C-Dfrd, D-Dfrd, E-Dfrd, and XA-Dfrd
notes as deferrable-interest notes in our analysis. Under the
transaction documents, the issuer can defer interest payments on
these notes. Our ratings on these classes of notes address the
ultimate payment of principal and interest. Once the ultimate
interest notes become the most senior, interest can still be
deferred, but all deferred interest is due on or prior to
maturity.

"Our ratings reflect our assessment of the transaction's payment
structure, cash flow mechanics, and the results of our cash flow
analysis to assess whether the notes are repaid under stress test
scenarios. Subordination and excess spread provide credit
enhancement to the class A to E-Dfrd notes that are senior to the
unrated notes and certificates. Taking these factors into account,
we consider that the available credit enhancement for the class A
to E-Dfrd notes is commensurate with the ratings assigned." The
class XA-Dfrd notes are uncollateralized and will be paid from any
excess spread available after the payment of more senior items in
the revenue waterfall.

  Ratings List

  Class    Rating*    Amount
                      (mil. GBP)
  A        AAA (sf)   720.479
  B-Dfrd   AA+ (sf)    31.785
  C-Dfrd   AA (sf)     19.071
  D-Dfrd   A+ (sf)     21.190
  E-Dfrd   A (sf)       8.476
  Z1       NR          37.297
  Z2       NR          9.325
  XA-Dfrd  B (sf)      1.000

* The ratings address timely receipt of interest and ultimate
repayment of principal for the class A notes. The ratings assigned
to the class B-Dfrd to E-Dfrd and XA-Dfrd notes are
interest-deferred ratings and address the ultimate payment of
interest and principal.
Dfrd--Deferred.
NR--Not rated.



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2020.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                * * * End of Transmission * * *