/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCREUR_Public/250124.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                          E U R O P E

          Friday, January 24, 2025, Vol. 26, No. 18

                           Headlines



F R A N C E

ELIOR GROUP: S&P Raises LongTerm ICR to 'B+', Outlook Stable
QUESTEL UNITE: S&P Assigns 'B' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable


G E R M A N Y

AVIV GROUP: S&P Assigns Preliminary 'B-' ICR, Outlook Positive


I R E L A N D

AQUEDUCT EUROPEAN 10: S&P Assigns B-(sf) Rating on Class F Notes


L U X E M B O U R G

CONTOURGLOBAL POWER: S&P Rates New Senior Secured Notes 'BB'


S P A I N

FONCAIXA FTGENCAT 6: S&P Raises Class C Notes Rating to 'BB-(sf)'


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

A.J. SIMS: Leonard Curtis Named as Administrators
ALTIS INDUSTRIES: Insolvency and Recovery Named as Administrators
CRAZY BEAR: Grant Thornton Named as Administrators
DOVETAIL GROUP: FRP Advisory Named as Administrators
FROST & CO: Voscap Limited Named as Administrators

HWS 3: Interpath Ltd Named as Administrators
IBERICA FOOD: RSM UK Restructuring Named as Administrators
INFRASAFE UK: KBL Advisory Named as Administrators
PETFORD TOOLS: MHA MacIntyre Named as Administrators


X X X X X X X X

[*] BOOK REVIEW: Dangerous Dreamers

                           - - - - -


===========
F R A N C E
===========

ELIOR GROUP: S&P Raises LongTerm ICR to 'B+', Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its long-term issuer credit rating on
Elior Group S.A., as well as the issue rating on its senior
unsecured debt, to 'B+' from 'B', with the recovery rating on the
senior unsecured debt unchanged at '3', indicating its expectation
of about 55% recovery in the event of default.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that continued
improved operational performance from the successful realization of
synergies with Derichebourg Multiservices (DMS), price increases,
and cost reduction measures will lead to improved profitability for
the group and support adjusted leverage improving to about 5.0x by
fiscal year-end 2025 and FFO to debt around 13.5%.

The new issuance and RCF will address its upcoming debt maturities.
The proceeds--including EUR152 million of drawings under the new
RCF--alongside EUR91 million of cash on balance sheet will be used
to:

-- Repay the existing EUR550 million senior unsecured notes due in
July 2026;

-- Repay EUR180 million of drawings under the existing senior
unsecured RCF; and

-- Pay EUR13 million of transaction fees.

In addition, Elior has already upsized and extended the maturity of
its securitization facility. The new initial maturity is September
2027 and it has a limit of EUR800 million. This compares with the
EUR360 million previously available under the securitization
facility and EUR100 million available under the DMS factoring line.
With EUR560 million drawn at fiscal year-end 2024 versus EUR392
million one year earlier, Elior has already increased utilization.
The cash collected has notably been used to repay in advance the
EUR100 million term loan maturing in 2026.

S&P said, "We continue to forecast an improvement in operational
performance in fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2026. We expect Elior's
revenue will increase by 5% to EUR6.4 billion in fiscal 2025 and by
4.5% in fiscal 2026, driven by price increases and higher volumes,
thanks to strong commercial activity with new contracts won,
notably thanks to the combined catering and multiservice offering.
We anticipate a 60-basis points improvement in S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margins to 5.4% by fiscal year-end 2025 and
to 6.0% by fiscal year-end 2026, thanks to a further impact
stemming from cost-saving measures previously taken, a greater
amount of synergies with DMS, and exceptional costs declining to
EUR23 million in fiscal 2025 and EUR10 million in fiscal 2026 from
EUR30 million in fiscal 2024.

"We expect free operating cash flow (FOCF) generation to remain
strong in coming years. In fiscal 2025, we forecast FOCF of about
EUR100 million, supported by working capital inflows (before
changes in securitization) of about EUR13 million, thanks to
improved receivables collection, and consistently low capital
expenditure (capex) of EUR140 million, corresponding to 2.2% of
revenue. In fiscal 2026, we anticipate an improvement to about
EUR150 million, driven by higher EBITDA and limited working capital
outflows of about EUR10 million, combined with capex of 2% of
revenue (about EUR130 million).

"The improvement in operational performance will support strong
deleveraging in fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2026. We forecast S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted leverage will decline to 4.9x by fiscal year-end
2025 and 4.0x by fiscal year-end 2026, from 5.8x in fiscal 2024,
driven by higher EBITDA and positive cash flow generation. Until
fiscal 2027, Elior will continue to annually amortize EUR56 million
of the currently EUR169 million outstanding French state-guaranteed
loan (PGE) and will also progressively reimburse the EUR152 million
of drawings under the new EUR430 million RCF facility. The
reduction in gross debt will lower cash interest paid and support
an increase in FFO to debt to 13.5% in fiscal 2025 and 18% in
fiscal 2026, from 10.7% in fiscal 2024.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that continued
improved operational performance from the successful realization of
synergies with DMS, price increases, and cost reduction measures
will lead to improved profitability for the group and support
adjusted leverage improving to about 5x by fiscal year-end 2025 and
FFO to debt around 13.5%.

"We could lower the rating if adjusted leverage stayed above 5.5x
or FFO to debt fell below 10% on a sustained basis. This could
result from underperformance due to higher-than-expected food cost
inflation which would be passed on to the client with delays, or
difficulties in delivering on the business improvement plan.

"We could also take a negative rating action if the proposed
refinancing of 2025 and 2026 debt maturities is not completed as
expected.

"We could raise the rating if Elior continues to increase
profitability, and if we further understood the company would
likely post metrics that support our forecast ratios, including
leverage sustained below 4.5x and FFO to debt above 16% by fiscal
year-end 2026 and thereafter. We would also expect the financial
policy to continue to support these levels."


QUESTEL UNITE: S&P Assigns 'B' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' long-term issuer credit rating
to France-based intellectual property management software and
service provider Questel Unite SAS and its 'B' issue and '3'
recovery ratings to the proposed EUR485 million term loan B. The
'3' recovery rating indicates its expectation of about 55% recovery
(rounded estimate) in the event of a default.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that solid
organic growth of 5%-6% and expansion of the adjusted EBITDA margin
to around 26% in 2025 and 28% in 2026 will drive leverage below
7.5x by 2026, alongside free operating cash flow (FOCF) of about
EUR30 million-EUR35 million per year (excluding transaction costs)
and funds from operations (FFO) cash interest coverage of around
2.5x.

"We forecast that Questel will deleverage from 9.3x (including PIK
debt) at the time of its debt refinancing. Questel is raising a
EUR485 million senior secured term loan B--split between a euro
tranche of EUR425 million and U.S. dollar tranche equivalent to
EUR60 million--and EUR161 million of subordinated PIK debt to
refinance its existing EUR635 million unitranche debt. The debt
package also includes a EUR100 million revolving credit facility
(RCF). We calculate adjusted debt to EBITDA of around 9.3x (7.2x
excluding the PIK debt) at the closing of the transaction, before
it declines to 8.0x (5.9x) in 2025 and 7.2x (5.2x) in 2026 on the
back of the EBITDA expansion, mainly fueled by client wins and the
cross-selling of higher-margin products."

Questel has leading market positions thanks to its wide range of
services across the IP management value chain. The company acts as
a one-stop-shop software and services provider for IP management.
Its services include the search, filing, translation, and renewal
of patents (67% of revenues) and trademarks (24%). It also offers
non-IP translation and innovation software and services (8%).
Questel is the No. 2 global software and services provider. Its IP
business intelligence software--which provides research and
analytics--and its translation services both rank No. 2; its IP
asset management software ranks No. 3; and its annuities and
renewals services rank No. 4. Questel's broad service offering and
tech-enabled platforms position it favorably to cross-sell its
services, win new outsourcing contracts, and gain market share from
more traditional service providers and law firms with a narrower
focus.

Questel operates in a stable but competitive niche market. Questel
competes with local and regional law firms and other IP management
service providers. S&P considers barriers to entry in the industry
as modest. However, Questel's operations as a one-stop-shop
platform across various segments in the IP management value chain,
its presence in more than 30 countries, and its reputation in the
market provide some protection against new entrants. Furthermore,
changing providers may entail operational risk.

Technological advancements like artificial intelligence are
increasing pricing pressure in some of Questel's business lines
like translation as it has to share the cost efficiencies with its
customers, which affects its profitability. Questel is also exposed
to the risk of technological obsolescence. However, the company has
a track record of technological innovation and investment in new
capabilities.

S&P said, "We view IP management as nondiscretionary as it is
crucial for companies to actively manage patents and trademarks to
limit competition and protect future earnings. Questel has also
demonstrated resilience through a crisis. As a result of continuous
research and development, we expect Questel's target addressable
market to grow by a compound annual rate of 2% between 2023 and
2028, to EUR8.0 billion."

Traditionally, IP-focused law firms have managed the IP management
process for their clients. Software and services providers can
offer integrated solutions to both corporates and law firms in a
more cost-efficient manner due to their scale of operations and
technology-enabled solutions. As a result, software and services
providers have outperformed the broader market and S&P expects this
trend to continue, fueling Questel's future revenue growth.

Questel's good geographical and service diversity partly mitigate
its exposure to market headwinds due to its small scale. S&P said,
"While Questel has more than doubled its revenue since 2020, we
view its scale of operations as small relative to its competitor
Clarivate, whose IP management business is almost double that of
Questel's, and relative to its broader business and technology
services peers. Questel's large geographical presence mitigates
this, as it provides services throughout Europe, the Middle East,
and Africa (52%), the Americas (36%), and Asia-Pacific (12%). In
our view, having operations in more than 30 countries and a
comprehensive set of services is beneficial not just in terms of
diversification, but it also provides a competitive advantage as it
allows Questel to serve large corporate clients with international
IP portfolios."

Questel's good revenue visibility reflects a high level of
recurring revenues and long-term client relationships. Some 22% of
Questel's revenues are subscription-based revenues from its
software as a service (SaaS) platforms. Contracts run for
three-to-five years and renew automatically every year. Another 17%
of revenues are from annuities and renewals, which have a high
degree of predictability over a long period of time. The other 58%
are recurring in nature under master service agreements.

Although individual volumes can fluctuate, Questel's large client
base with low customer concentration (the top 10 clients contribute
about 15% of revenues) and diverse end-market exposure mitigate
this fluctuation. Revenue visibility derives further support from
strong customer retention, with churn of less than 3%, and
long-term client relationships, as evident from Questel's average
11-year relationship with its 10 largest customers. Questel's
reputation and the high cost of failure underpin this revenue
stability. The company has already contracted around 65% of its
revenue for 2025.

Improvements in the EBITDA margin in 2025 and 2026 will underpin
earnings growth. In recent years, the challenges of integrating
Morningside, which Questel acquired in 2021, and investments in the
business have hampered Questel's revenue growth and profitability.
In 2025-2026, S&P forecasts revenue growth of 5%-6%, driven by new
customers, the cross-selling of services to existing clients, and
up-selling thanks to the addition of more features to the
platforms. In particular, S&P forecasts an increasing proportion of
higher-margin SaaS-based revenues from the bundling of IP asset
management software with annuities and renewals.

While 70% of Questel's costs are variable, limiting operating
leverage, offshoring, and achieving cost efficiencies from
automation will further boost profitability. S&P said, "As a
result, we expect Questel's adjusted EBITDA margin to improve to
around 26% in 2025 and 28% in 2026 from 24% in 2023. A reduction in
restructuring and integration costs from around EUR5.5 million in
2024 to EUR2.0 million-EUR3.0 million in 2025-2026 will also help
to improve the margin."

Despite solid FFO cash interest coverage and positive FOCF
generation, Questel's financial sponsor ownership and leverage
tolerance restrict the rating. S&P said, "While we have not
factored any acquisitions into our forecast, we understand that the
company could make bolt-on acquisitions to add complementary
services or technology. Our ratings reflect our view that the
financial sponsors are likely to prioritize a shareholder-friendly
financial policy over debt repayment." Nevertheless, the ratings
reflect:

-- S&P's expectation of deleveraging from the high level of
adjusted debt to EBITDA of 9.3x at the closing of the transaction;

-- Comfortable FFO cash interest coverage of 2.4x-2.6x in 2025 and
2026, bolstered by EBITDA expansion and contained cash interest
expenses due to the presence of PIK debt in the capital structure;
and

-- FOCF of around EUR28 million in 2025 (excluding one-off
refinancing costs) and EUR36 million in 2026. This reflects cash
interest expenses of about EUR33 million per year, limited working
capital outflows of about EUR3 million-EUR4 million, and capex of
about EUR13 million (5.5%-6.0% of revenues).

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that solid
organic growth of 5%-6% and expansion of the adjusted EBITDA margin
to around 26% in 2025 and 28% in 2026, will drive leverage below
7.5x by 2026, alongside FOCF of about EUR30 million-EUR35 million
per year (excluding transaction costs) and FFO cash interest
coverage of around 2.5x.

"We could lower the rating if Questel's FOCF after leases turns
negative or if FFO cash interest coverage declines below 2.0x on a
sustained basis. This could occur if the company underperforms our
forecasts due to increased competition, operational missteps, or
greater exposure to macroeconomic cycles from a larger contribution
from more transactional services.

"We could also lower the ratings if Questel's financial policy
prevents deleveraging below 7.5x.

"We see an upgrade as unlikely over the next 12 months due to
Questel's highly leveraged capital structure. We could consider an
upgrade if shareholders committed to and demonstrated a more
prudent financial policy, leading to adjusted debt to EBITDA below
5.0x, along with an improvement in FOCF to debt to above 10% on a
sustained basis."




=============
G E R M A N Y
=============

AVIV GROUP: S&P Assigns Preliminary 'B-' ICR, Outlook Positive
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary 'B-' issuer credit and
issue ratings on real estate online classifieds operator AVIV Group
GmbH and its proposed term loan B (TLB). The preliminary recovery
rating of the proposed EUR1,050 million TLB is '3', reflecting its
expectations of a meaningful recovery (rounded estimate: 65%) in
the event of a default.

The positive outlook indicates that S&P could raise its rating on
AVIV in the 12 months after the transaction closes if the group
performs in line with our expectations, such that S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted leverage fell below 7.0x and FOCF to debt improved
above 5%.

The preliminary 'B-' rating reflects AVIV's strong positions in
core markets and sound growth prospects, however, it is constrained
by low profitability and high leverage in the near term.  S&P said,
"Our rating is supported by AVIV's No. 1 market position in France,
Belgium, and Israel, which account for nearly 70% of group revenue
combined. These strong market positions give AVIV pricing power
toward customers and provide stability to revenues during
macroeconomic downturns. That said, our assessment is constrained
by AVIV's relatively small scale compared with peers in the
classifieds sector; its product and geographic concentration, which
exposes it to macroeconomic and geopolitical trends; and its No. 2
position in Germany, where we think it is more at risk of
disruption from competitors."

The rating also reflects AVIV's high capitalized development and
exceptional costs, which will lead to subdued profitability and
negative FOCF generation until 2026. S&P said, "We estimate this
will lead to high initial leverage of 10.6x in 2025. If the planned
transformation completes successfully, we expect leverage to
improve sharply to about 5.0x in 2026 driven by EBITDA margins
expanding toward 35% (from 15%-20% in 2024-2025). The earnings
improvement will mainly come from a sharp reduction in investment
in its tech platforms, lower restructuring costs, and our
expectation of sound topline growth."

AVIV's strong brand portfolio and leading market positions allow it
to weather tough macroeconomic conditions.  AVIV's well-known
brands and leading audience sizes lead to strong pricing power with
real estate agents, low churn, and a degree of protection against
cyclical macroeconomic downturns. AVIV has recently faced tough
operating conditions due to the negative effect of rising interest
rates on the real estate market, which resulted in materially lower
property transaction volumes and a chunk of its smaller agent base
ceasing business with AVIV (agent numbers declined 27% in France
between January 2023 and June 2024 mainly due to insolvencies).
That said, S&P estimates that group revenues increased by about 3%
in 2024, mainly thanks to contribution from new acquisitions and
supported by revenue contribution from larger agents as well as
price increases.

Improving macroeconomic conditions should lead to 7%-8% revenue
growth in the next two years.  S&P said, "We expect topline growth
to accelerate on the back of a low-single-digit recovery in listing
volumes, supported by our expectation of a gradual easing in
interest rates, price increases, and contribution from fast-growing
but smaller business segments such as seller leads and privates.
Part of AVIV's strategy is to increasingly monetize
private-to-private transactions (AVIV has previously focused
virtually exclusively on agent-operated transactions) and seller
leads to real estate agents. This could improve its revenue
diversity; however, we consider that this is subject to execution
risk given the private segment is currently dominated by
competitors in France and Germany. We also expect a 10%-12% yearly
increase in revenues from horizontal classifieds platform Yad2
(Israel) despite the current geopolitical environment, supported by
its very strong market position." That said, AVIV remains more
exposed to potential macroeconomic shocks than some of its larger
and better diversified peers, given its concentration in a cyclical
sector like Real Estate and in countries with uncertain
macroeconomic and political outlooks like Germany and France.

AVIV is smaller in scale and currently has lower and more volatile
profitability compared with peers.   S&P said, "We think AVIV has a
weaker business diversity and scale compared to rated online
classifieds peers The Stepstone Group Midco 1 GmbH
(B(prelim)/Stable/--) and Speedster Bidco GmbH (B-/Stable/--). Both
Stepstone and Speedster have a significant presence in North
America, better product diversity, and S&P Global Ratings-adjusted
EBITDA of close to or over EUR300 million (compared with AVIV's
expected EBITDA of EUR95 million-EUR115 million in 2024-2025). We
also note that, due to the ongoing investments in its tech
platforms, AVIV shows higher volatility in S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA and FOCF compared with rated peers. We
forecast that due to the ongoing business transformation, AVIV will
have materially weaker profitability (15%-20% EBITDA margins in
2023-2025) in the near term compared with rated peers--whose
margins range between 30%-65%--including Zephyr Midco 2 Ltd.
(B-/Positive/--) and Titan Parent New Zealand Ltd. (Trade Me;
B-/Stable/--)."

AVIV's profitability should improve materially once it completes
its tech transformation, but not without some execution risk.  S&P
said, "We forecast adjusted EBITDA margins will increase toward
industry-average levels of 35% by 2026, from 15%-20% in 2024-2025.
AVIV's profitability metrics are subdued due to high capitalized
development costs associated with the group's investments into its
white label platform, as well as costs associated with initiatives
to reduce overheads. We expect the transformation will be fully
complete in 2027, although the group forecasts a material reduction
in capitalized development costs after 2024. In addition to high
capitalized development costs, profitability is currently
constrained by the heightened opex from running multiple platforms
simultaneously, as well as the costs of resizing the teams involved
in the tech transformation."

S&P said, "We think that the transformation comes with a degree of
execution risk. This is because the successful migration of all
existing processes into the unified white-label platform could take
longer than expected and note that the headcount reduction plan
partially depends on the negotiations with labor unions in France
and Germany, which could result in delays and/or higher costs
associated with the plan. That said, we also take into account that
a portion of its reduction in staff costs will be achieved through
lower freelance work, which is not subject to these risks.

"We expect AVIV to sustain an adequate liquidity position over the
forecast period.  The group has prefunded the outlays associated
with the transformation plan in 2025 and is expected to close the
refinancing transaction with EUR100 million of cash on balance
sheet. Full availability under the EUR200 million revolving credit
facility (RCF) will also provide ample liquidity buffer for
potential operating underperformance or further investment into the
business. The expected return to positive FOCF from 2026 onward, as
well as AVIV's asset light business model and limited seasonality
in working capital also support our view.

"Group credit considerations do not affect our view on AVIV's
credit quality.  AVIV, along with the online job classifieds
business Stepstone, will be split from Axel Springer in a
transaction that we expect will close in the second quarter of
2025. Following the transaction, KKR and CPPIB will own about 90%
of AVIV and the other classified businesses spun off from Axel
Springer through its holding company Traviata. The remaining
minority stake of approximately 10% in AVIV and each classified
asset will be owned by Axel Springer and Springer family members.
The classified businesses, including AVIV, will operate as separate
and independent entities and will set up financing through separate
restricted groups. We view Traviata as the intermediate holding
company whose primary purpose is to control these operating
companies and will be generally reliant on these companies' cash
flow to service its financial obligations. Traviata will refinance
its outstanding term loan with a new payment-in-kind financing in
early 2025. We understand this financing will be subordinated to
the debt of all operating companies, nonrecourse, will have longer
maturity than their debt, will not require cash interest payments,
and is expected to be repaid after the sale of Stepstone and/or
AVIV.

"We view Traviata's creditworthiness as somewhat stronger than that
of AVIV, on account of its lower leverage, larger scale of
operations, and a more diversified business mix. That said, we do
not think that the likelihood of extraordinary support from
Traviata is strong enough to positively affect our ratings on
AVIV.

"The preliminary ratings are subject to the successful issuance of
the proposed debt, and our satisfactory review of the final
documentation.   Accordingly, the preliminary ratings should not be
construed as evidence of final ratings. If we do not receive the
final documentation within a reasonable time frame, or if the final
documentation departs from the materials we have already reviewed,
we reserve the right to withdraw or revise our ratings. Potential
changes include, but are not limited to, the key terms and
conditions of AVIV's capital structure and Traviata--including, but
not limited to, interest rate, maturity, size, financial and other
covenants, the security, and ranking of debt--as well as the use of
proceeds.

"The positive outlook indicates that we could raise our rating on
AVIV in the 12 months after the transaction closes if the group
performs in line with our expectations, such that S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted leverage fell below 7.0x and FOCF to debt improved
toward 5%.

"We could revise our outlook to stable if AVIV failed to execute
the projected cost savings to improve EBITDA margins toward 30%, or
if topline fell materially short of expectations, leading to
sustained leverage above 7.0x and FOCF to debt remaining well below
5% on a consistent basis.

"We could raise the ratings on AVIV if it delivered strong revenue
growth and improving EBITDA margins toward 30% such that its S&P
Global Ratings-adjusted leverage fell below 7.0x on a consistent
basis and FOCF to debt approached 5%. Such an improvement would
reflect sound progress in the execution of the transformation plan
contributing to stronger profitability and cash flow generation. We
could also raise the ratings on AVIV if we saw material improvement
in the creditworthiness of its parent group."




=============
I R E L A N D
=============

AQUEDUCT EUROPEAN 10: S&P Assigns B-(sf) Rating on Class F Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned credit ratings to Aqueduct European CLO
10 DAC's class A to F European cash flow CLO notes. At closing, the
issuer also issued unrated class Z-1, Z-2, and Z-3 notes and
subordinated notes.

Under the transaction documents, the rated notes pay quarterly
interest unless a frequency switch event occurs. Following this,
the notes will permanently switch to semiannual payments.

The portfolio's reinvestment period will end approximately 4.5
years after closing, while the non-call period will end 1.5 years
after closing.

The ratings reflect S&P's assessment of:

-- The diversified collateral pool, which primarily comprises
broadly syndicated speculative-grade senior secured term loans and
bonds that are governed by collateral quality tests.

-- The credit enhancement provided through the subordination of
cash flows, excess spread, and overcollateralization.

-- The collateral manager's experienced team, which can affect the
performance of the rated notes through collateral selection,
ongoing portfolio management, and trading.

-- The transaction's legal structure, which is bankruptcy remote.

-- The transaction's counterparty risks, which are in line with
S&P's counterparty rating framework.

  Portfolio benchmarks

  S&P Global Ratings' weighted-average rating factor   2,988.44
  Default rate dispersion                                527.50
  Weighted-average life (years)                            4.49
  Obligor diversity measure                              153.84
  Industry diversity measure                              20.73
  Regional diversity measure                               1.28

  Transaction key metrics

  Portfolio weighted-average rating
  derived from S&P's CDO evaluator                            B
  'CCC' category rated assets (%)                          1.75
  'AAA' weighted-average recovery (%)                     36.95
  Weighted-average spread (net of floors; %)               3.95
  Weighted-average coupon (%)                              4.75

The portfolio is well-diversified, primarily comprising broadly
syndicated speculative-grade senior secured term loans and senior
secured bonds. Therefore, S&P has conducted its credit and cash
flow analysis by applying its criteria for corporate cash flow
CDOs.

S&P said, "In our cash flow analysis, we used the EUR600 million
target par amount, the covenanted weighted-average spread (3.95%),
and the covenanted weighted-average coupon (4.75%) as indicated by
the collateral manager. We have assumed the actual weighted-average
recovery rate at all rating levels. We applied various cash flow
stress scenarios, using four different default patterns, in
conjunction with different interest rate stress scenarios for each
liability rating category.

"Our credit and cash flow analysis shows that the class B to F
notes benefit from break-even default rate and scenario default
rate cushions that we would typically consider to be in line with
higher ratings than those assigned. However, as the CLO is still in
its reinvestment phase, during which the transaction's credit risk
profile could deteriorate, we have capped our ratings on the notes.
The class A notes can withstand stresses commensurate with the
assigned rating."

Until the end of the reinvestment period on July 18, 2029, the
collateral manager may substitute assets in the portfolio for so
long as our CDO Monitor test is maintained or improved in relation
to the initial ratings on the notes. This test looks at the total
amount of losses that the transaction can sustain as established by
the initial cash flows for each rating and compares that with the
current portfolio's default potential plus par losses to date. As a
result, until the end of the reinvestment period, the collateral
manager may through trading deteriorate the transaction's current
risk profile, if the initial ratings are maintained.

S&P said, "Under our structured finance sovereign risk criteria,
the transaction's exposure to country risk is sufficiently
mitigated at the assigned ratings.

"At closing, the transaction's documented counterparty replacement
and remedy mechanisms adequately mitigate its exposure to
counterparty risk under our current counterparty criteria.

"The transaction's legal structure and framework is bankruptcy
remote, in line with our legal criteria.

"Following our analysis of the credit, cash flow, counterparty,
operational, and legal risks, we believe the ratings assigned are
commensurate with the available credit enhancement for the class A
to F notes.

"In addition to our standard analysis, to indicate how rising
pressures among speculative-grade corporates could affect our
ratings on European CLO transactions, we have also included the
sensitivity of the ratings on the class A to E notes based on four
hypothetical scenarios.

"As our ratings analysis makes additional considerations before
assigning ratings in the 'CCC' category -- and we would assign a
'B-' rating if the criteria for assigning a 'CCC' category rating
are not met -- we have not included the above scenario analysis
results for the class F notes."

Environmental, social, and governance

S&P said, "We regard the exposure to environmental, social, and
governance (ESG) credit factors in the transaction as being broadly
in line with our benchmark for the sector. Primarily due to the
diversity of the assets within CLOs, the exposure to environmental
credit factors is viewed as below average, social credit factors
are below average, and governance credit factors are average. For
this transaction, the documents prohibit or limit certain assets
from being related to certain activities. Since the exclusion of
assets from these activities does not result in material
differences between the transaction and our ESG benchmark for the
sector, no specific adjustments have been made in our rating
analysis to account for any ESG-related risks or opportunities."

  Ratings list

                    Amount     Credit
  Class  Rating*   (mil. EUR)  enhancement (%)   Interest rate§

  A      AAA (sf)    372.00    38.00 Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                          plus 1.28%

  B      AA (sf)      66.00    27.00 Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                          plus 2.00%

  C      A (sf)       35.10    21.15 Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                          plus 2.45%

  D      BBB- (sf)    42.90    14.00 Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                          plus 3.20%

  E      BB- (sf)     27.00     9.50 Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                          plus 5.75%

  F      B- (sf)      18.00     6.50 Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                          plus 8.17%

  Z-1    NR            0.10     N/A       N/A

  Z-2    NR            0.10     N/A       N/A

  Z-3    NR            0.10     N/A       N/A

  Sub    NR            49.80    N/A       N/A

*The ratings assigned to the class A and B notes address timely
interest and ultimate principal payments. The ratings assigned to
the class C, D, E, and F notes address ultimate interest and
principal payments.
§The payment frequency switches to semiannual and the index
switches to six-month EURIBOR when a frequency switch event occurs.

EURIBOR--Euro Interbank Offered Rate.
NR--Not rated.
N/A--Not applicable.




===================
L U X E M B O U R G
===================

CONTOURGLOBAL POWER: S&P Rates New Senior Secured Notes 'BB'
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned a 'BB' issue rating to ContourGlobal
Power Holdings S.A.'s (CGPH) proposed issuance and with a '2'
recovery rating. At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'BB-' issuer
credit ratings.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's view that the group's portfolio
will continue to perform strongly, allowing CG to finance its
ambitious growth strategy and timely replacing Maritsa's phase-out
which historically represented 20% of total distributions. S&P
expects debt to EBITDA to remain below 5.5x and funds from
operations (FFO) to debt above 10%.

The proposed transaction will improve recovery prospects for CGPH's
lenders while maintaining the holdco's leverage. S&P said, "In our
view, management has proactively improved the capital structure by
refinancing its EUR410 million notes well ahead of their maturity
in 2026. CP is also proposing to reduce the midco's indebtedness by
close to 60%, which will materially reduce CGPH's risk of cash flow
interruption. Our view of the strong asset performance portfolio
and the lower and temporary indebtedness remaining at the midco has
led us to revise our recovery rating to '2' from '4'. This provides
a one-notch uplift from the issuer credit rating, leading to the
'BB' issue rating."

S&P said, "Our rating assumes management's commitment to unwind the
midco's subordination within the next two years. Although
collateral and guarantors provided to CGPH's lenders under the
secured notes have remain unchained to existing ones, we think the
recently created midco structure weakens their position. This is
because there are no second liens to the asset's vehicles and CGPH
benefits only from a claim to the residual value of the midco,
which has priority over the ownership of the assets. That said,
management is expecting to entirely refinance midco's debt at the
CGPH level, including EUR350 million secured notes and the EUR240
million RCF, which is a key credit consideration for our current
recovery rating. Therefore, is highly likely we could reconsider
our analytical approach if we see an increase in midco's leverage
or if its capital structure strategy changes.

"The strategic decision to phase out of coal faster than
anticipated and the volatility in the Spanish markets will weigh on
dividend distributions. We had expected two out of the four coal
units at Bulgarian coal-fired plant Maritsa would remain
operational for the winter months until 2027. However, CGPH has
decided to accelerate the phase-out process by shutting down
operations and focusing on progressively repurposing these units.
The loss of dividend distributions from Maritsa to CG materially
affects our revenue forecasts because we were expecting the coal
units to provide US$35 million-US$45 million through to 2027.
Additionally, the increasing penetration of renewables in Spain and
lower system needs will affect utilization rates at the Arrubal
combine-cycle power plant and reduce margins amid extremely low
electricity prices. We now assume around $20 million of
distributions, significantly down from our previously expectation
of $45 million-$55 million. We forecast the weighted-average holdco
debt to EBITDA will deteriorate toward 5.0x-5.2x, from 4.8x
previously."

Recent acquisitions and ongoing greenfield developments will
progressively replace and strengthened distributions. There are
ongoing photovoltaic (PV) and battery energy storage system
developments at Maritsa with the two repurposed units having a
total capacity of 404MW. Other asset-specific investments, together
with the revamping and repowering of existing assets in Italy and
Austria, should increase the portfolio's capacity by 105MW and
extend the asset's technical lifespan. Furthermore, recently
contracted PV portfolios acquired in the U.S. and Chile have
increased the renewable exposure of the portfolio by 1GW. These
investments will not replace the distribution shortfall in a timely
manner because construction is likely to be progressive and
completed within the next three years. Once completed, however, S&P
expects distributions exclusively from asset operations will be
close to $350 million compared to around $280 million expected in
2024.

The portfolio's track record of strong operating performance and
successful growth supports CG's credit quality despite distribution
volatility. The company has been delivering strong operating
results, with performance across the assets consistently above
contractual requirements. Proactive and experienced management of
the assets' operating and maintenance activities is being combined
with a strong focus on cost optimization. S&P said, "We see limited
execution risk for ongoing developments and we view as positive the
recently acquired assets given company's successful M&A track
record over the last 10 years. Since we first rated the company in
2012, it has managed to increase its capacity to 8.7GW, from 2.7GW,
and now operates 188 assets versus 21 initially."

S&P said, "We foresee enhanced business fundamentals driven by
technological and geographical diversification as well as higher
cash-flow predictability. Increasing the number of investments in
the U.S. and Europe has materially reduced the group's exposure to
country, political, and currency risk. Its focus on highly
contracted solar assets has also increased the stability and
predictability of cash flows while limiting resource risk compared
to other renewables such as wind. Although the phase-out of Maritsa
and lower margins from Arrubal will likely weigh on revenues in the
short term, these factors will reduce the portfolio's exposure to
merchants and strengthen the diversification of the portfolio. We
expect the group's renewables generation from highly rated
geographies will trend toward 55% of total EBITDA generation, from
35% currently, seeing merchant exposure reduce to 45% from the
current 65%. That said, compared to peers we see CG's business
profile as somewhat weaker than peers with the same business risk
profile of satisfactory. This reflects the shorter tenor of
contracted average life and the remaining exposure to thermal fleet
located in emerging countries. Although these assets have strong
economics and adequate track records of cash flow stability, we
tend to see them as exposed to greater economic, institutional, and
governance risk.

"We identified increased leverage and M&A as key credit risks.
Debt-funded investments could lead us to take a negative rating
action if not compensated by operating assets' cash flow
contributions to CG such that debt to EBITDA stays below 5.5x and
FFO to debt stays above 10% on average. Further leverage at
encumbered assets with limited headroom could also increase
dividend interruption risk and cash flow volatility, leading to
deteriorating credit metrics. That said, we expect the group will
prioritize the allocation of excess cash toward investments and M&A
in the short term rather than further leverage the holdco.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that adjusted holdco
debt to EBITDA will be no higher than 5.5x and FFO to debt will be
above 10% over our forecast period while CG develops its growth
plan.

"We also expect acquisitions and greenfield investments to increase
CG's energy capacity and respective distributions to CGPH. This
should compensate for the phase-out of the Maritsa coal plant,
which represented 15%-20% of total distributions. We expect the
growing portfolio will continue to operate under long-term
contracts with mostly investment-grade counterparties and generate
predictable cash flows to support its debt obligations."

S&P could downgrade CG and CGPH by one notch if:

-- S&P sees an increase in debt at CGPH such that adjusted holdco
debt to EBITDA increases above 5.5x and FFO to debt trends below
10% in the next two years;

-- There is a material falloff in distributions from the asset
portfolio. This could happen because of inappropriately managed
growth while phasing out coal, or significant operating
underperformance;

-- There is an increased leverage at the corporate or midco
levels;

-- Against S&P's expectations, it sees the new sponsor maximizing
shareholders' returns to the detriment of CG's credit quality.

S&P said, "We could lower the issue ratings by one notch if we
lower the issuer credit rating by one notch, if we see management
leveraging the midco structure, or if we estimate recovery
prospects for holdco creditors have fallen below 70% because of the
additional subordination, debt, or lower or deteriorated quality of
distributions.

"We see an upgrade in the short term as unlikely because of ongoing
volatility of distributions while CG's phases out of one its key
assets. We could consider raising the rating if the company manages
to successfully deliver on its business plan while consistently
maintaining debt to EBITDA below 5x and FFO to debt above 12%."




=========
S P A I N
=========

FONCAIXA FTGENCAT 6: S&P Raises Class C Notes Rating to 'BB-(sf)'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised to 'BBB- (sf)' from 'B+ (sf)' and to 'BB-
(sf)' from 'CCC+ (sf)' its credit ratings on Foncaixa FTGENCAT 6,
Fondo de Titulizacion de Activos's class B and C notes,
respectively. At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'AAA (sf)' and 'D
(sf)' ratings on the class AG and D notes, respectively.

Foncaixa FTGENCAT 6 is a single-jurisdiction cash flow CLO
transaction securitizing a portfolio of small and midsize
enterprise (SME) loans that CaixaBank S.A. originated in Spain. The
transaction closed in July 2008 and is currently amortizing.

The underlying portfolio is relatively seasoned, with a pool factor
(the percentage of the pool's outstanding aggregate principal
balance compared with the closing date balance) of about 7.45%,
down from 9.50% since our most recent rating action on Aug. 24,
2023.

According to reports prepared by the management company, cumulative
defaults of 12 months have remained relatively stable since our
previous review in 2023.

The transaction includes a cash reserve, funded on the closing
date, providing liquidity support to the notes throughout the
transaction's life. The cash reserve is currently at the required
level and will eventually be used to redeem the notes.

S&P said, "Our ratings on the notes reflect our assessment of the
underlying asset pool's credit and cash flow characteristics, as
well as our analysis of the transaction's exposure to counterparty,
operational, and legal risks.

"We used data from the September 2024 report and loan-level data to
perform our credit and cash flow analysis. We applied our European
SME CLO, structured finance sovereign risk, and counterparty
criteria."

Credit analysis

S&P said, "The underlying portfolio has amortized by EUR14.48
million since our previous review, with a current outstanding
balance of EUR55.90 million. The portfolio's amortization resulted
in a corresponding EUR15.19 million paydown of the class AG notes,
which currently have an outstanding balance of EUR34.22 million.
Therefore, the class AG notes' credit enhancement has increased to
54.19% from 45.47% since 2023. Due to the class AG notes'
deleveraging, the credit enhancement for the class B notes
increased to 34.11% from 28.92%. The class C and D notes' credit
enhancement also increased.

"We applied our European SME CLO criteria to determine the scenario
default rates (SDRs)--the minimum level of portfolio defaults we
expect each tranche can withstand at a specific rating level--using
CDO Evaluator.

"To determine the SDR, we adjusted the archetypical European SME
average 'b+' credit quality to reflect the following factors:
country, originator, and portfolio selection.

"In previous analysis, under our criteria, we ranked the originator
in this transaction in the moderate category. Taking into account
Spain's Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment (BICRA) score of 4
and the originator's average annual observed default frequency, we
adjusted the archetypical average credit quality downward by one
notch to 'b' from 'b+'.

"There is no adverse selection in the securitized portfolio's
creditworthiness when compared against the originator's SME loan
book, so we did not adjust the average credit quality to address
portfolio selection bias, in line with our previous review. We
therefore used the 'b' assessment to generate our 'AAA' SDR.

"We calculated the 'B' SDR based primarily on our analysis of
historical SME performance data, the weighted-average life of the
portfolio, and our projections of the transaction's future
performance considering the portfolio concentration. We also
assessed market developments, macroeconomic factors, changes in
country risk, and the way these factors are likely to affect the
loan portfolio's creditworthiness. In doing so, we lowered our 'B'
case SDR to 16% from 17% since 2023. We interpolated the SDRs for
rating levels between 'B' and 'AAA' in accordance with our European
SME CLO criteria."

Recovery rate analysis

S&P said, "We applied a weighted-average recovery rate (WARR) at
each liability rating level by considering the asset type and its
seniority, the country recovery grouping, and the observed
historical recoveries in this transaction. In a benign economic
environment, we expect recoveries to be approximately 50%, in line
with the historical observations."

Cash flow analysis

S&P said, "We used the portfolio balance the servicer considered to
be performing, the current weighted-average spread, and the above
WARR. We subjected the capital structure to various cash flow
stress scenarios, incorporating different default patterns and
interest rate curves, to determine the rating level, based on the
available credit enhancement for the notes under our European SME
CLO criteria.

"Under our structured finance sovereign risk criteria, the
transaction's exposure to country risk is sufficiently mitigated at
the assigned ratings.

"The transaction's documented counterparty replacement and remedy
mechanisms adequately mitigate its exposure to counterparty risk
under our current counterparty criteria at the assigned ratings.

"The transaction's legal structure and framework is bankruptcy
remote, in line with our legal criteria."

Rating rationale

S&P said, "Based on the portfolio's positive performance, as well
as our analysis of the transaction's exposure to counterparty,
legal and operational risks, we consider the available credit
enhancement for the class B and C notes to be commensurate with
higher ratings than previously assigned. This reflects ongoing
macroeconomic factors that could affect future performance. We
therefore raised to 'BBB- (sf)' from 'B+ (sf)' and to 'BB- (sf)'
from 'CCC+ (sf)' our ratings on the class B and C notes,
respectively. The class AG notes continue to pass at the 'AAA'
rating level and so we affirmed our 'AAA (sf)' rating on these
notes. There remains deferred interest on the class D notes,
therefore we affirmed our 'D (sf)' rating on these notes."

Foncaixa FTGENCAT 6 is a cash flow CLO transaction backed by
Spanish SME loans originated by CaixaBank S.A.




===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================

A.J. SIMS: Leonard Curtis Named as Administrators
-------------------------------------------------
A.J. Sims Limited was placed into administration proceedings in
Business and Property Courts in Leeds, Court Number:
CR-2025-000051, and Ryan Holdsworth and Danielle Shore of Leonard
Curtis (UK) Limited were appointed as administrators on Jan. 17,
2025.  

A.J. Sims Limited engages in the retail sale of footwear in
specialised stores.

Its registered office is at 4th Floor, Fountain Precinct, Leopold
Street, Sheffield, S1 2JA.
Its principal trading address is at 11 Eldon Street, Barnsley, S70
2JR.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

         Ryan Holdsworth
         Danielle Shore
         Leonard Curtis (UK) Limited
         4th Floor, Fountain Precinct
         Leopold Street, Sheffield, S1 2JA

For further details, contact:

         The Joint Administrators
         Tel No: 0114-285-9500

Alternative contact:

         Shannon Jones
         Email: shannon.jones@leonardcurtis.co.uk


ALTIS INDUSTRIES: Insolvency and Recovery Named as Administrators
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Altis Industries Limited was placed into administration proceedings
in In the High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of
England and Wales, Court Number: CR-2025-000095, and Ken Touhey of
Insolvency and Recovery Limited were appointed as administrators on
Jan. 14, 2025.  

Altis Industries engages in the wholesale of machine tools.

Its registered office is at 34-36 Liphook Road, Lindford, Bordon,
Hampshire, GU35 0PP which is the process of changing to Chatsworth
House, 39 Chatsworth Road, Worthing, West Sussex, BN11 1LY.

Its principal trading address is at 34-36 Liphook Road, Lindford,
Bordon, Hampshire, GU35 0PP.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

        Ken Touhey
        Insolvency and Recovery Limited
        Chatsworth House
        39 Chatsworth Road
        Worthing
        West Sussex, BN11 1LY

For further details, please contact:

        Vanessa Blackwell
        Tel No: 01903-239313
        Email: vblackwell@irluk.co.uk


CRAZY BEAR: Grant Thornton Named as Administrators
--------------------------------------------------
Crazy Bear Group Limited was placed into administration proceedings
in the High Court Of Justice, Company & Insolvency List, (ChD),
Court Number: No 000087 of 2025, and Kevin J Coates, and Shane R
Smith of Grant Thornton UK were appointed as administrators on
January 13, 2025.  

Crazy Bear operates hotels.

Its registered office is at  2nd Floor, 82 King Street, Manchester,
M2 4WQ.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

      Kevin J Coates
      Shane R Smith
      Grant Thornton UK LLP
      30 Finsbury Square
      London EC2A 1AG
      Tel: 020-7184-4300

For further information, contact:

      CMU Support
      Grant Thornton UK LLP
      Tel No: 0161 953 6906
      Email: cmusupport@uk.gt.com
      30 Finsbury Square
      London EC2A 1AG


DOVETAIL GROUP: FRP Advisory Named as Administrators
----------------------------------------------------
Dovetail Group (UK) Ltd was placed into administration proceedings
in The High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in
Newcastle Court Number: CR-2025-000006, and Martyn James Pullin and
David Antony Willis of FRP Advisory Trading Limited were appointed
as administrators on Jan. 15, 2025.  

Dovetail Group is a total facilities management organisation.  The
Company's range of services includes Reactive Maintenance through
to Electrical Compliance testing, Grounds Maintenance through to
Arboricultural Surveys.

Its registered office is at Units 5/6 - Patricks Farm Barns,
Meriden Road, Hampton-In-Arden, B92 0LT.  Its principal trading
address is at 1st Floor, 34 Falcon Court, Preston Farm Business
Park, Stockton on Tees, TS18 3TX.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

       Martyn James Pullin
       David Antony Willis
       FRP Advisory Trading Limited
       1st Floor, 34 Falcon Court
       Preston Farm Business Park
       Stockton on Tees
       TS18 3TX

For further details, contact:

       The Joint Administrators
       Tel No: 01642 917555

Alternative contact:

       Lianne Maidman
       Email: Lianne.Maidman@frpadvisory.com


FROST & CO: Voscap Limited Named as Administrators
--------------------------------------------------
Frost & Co. Jewellers Limited was placed into administration
proceedings in the High Court of Justice Business and Property
Courts of England and Wales Insolvency and Companies List,
Court Number: CR-2025-000177, and Ian Lawrence Goodhew and Abigail
Shearing of Voscap Limited were appointed as administrators on
January 17, 2025.  

Frost & Co. Jewellers engages in the retail sale of new goods.

Its registered office is at Unit 3, Gateway Mews, London, England,
N11 2UT.  Its principal trading address is at 67 Grosvenor Street,
Mayfair, London, W1K 3JN.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

        Ian Lawrence Goodhew
        Abigail Shearing
        Voscap Limited
        67 Grosvenor Street, Mayfair
        London, W1K 3JN

For further details, contact:

        William Belsey-Farrer
        Tel No: 0207-769-6831
        Email: team@voscap.co.uk


HWS 3: Interpath Ltd Named as Administrators
--------------------------------------------
HWS 3 Limited was placed into administration proceedings in the
High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and
Wales, Insolvency and Companies List (ChD), No CR-2025-000284, and
William James Wright and Christopher Robert Pole of Interpath Ltd
were appointed as administrators on January 16, 2025.  

HWS 3 Limited is a holding company.

Its registered office is at Interpath Ltd, 10 Fleet Place, London,
EC4M 7RB.  

Its principal trading address is at Building 1 Imperial Place,
Elstree Way, Borehamwood, Herts, WD6 1JN.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

      William James Wright
      Christopher Robert Pole
      Interpath Ltd
      10 Fleet Place
      London, EC4M 7RB

For further details, contact:

      HWSR@interpath.com


IBERICA FOOD: RSM UK Restructuring Named as Administrators
----------------------------------------------------------
Iberica Food & Culture Limited was placed into administration
proceedings in the High Court of Justice, Business and Property
Courts of England and Wales, Insolvency and Companies List (ChD),
Court Number: CR-2024-007382, and Gordon Thomson and Stephanie
Sutton of RSM UK Restructuring Advisory LLP were appointed as
administrators on Dec. 13, 2024.  

Iberica Food is a licensed restaurant.

Its registered office is c/o RSM UK Restructuring Advisory LLP, 25
Farringdon Street, London, EC4A 4AB (Formerly) 195 Great Portland
Street, London, W1W 5PS.  Its principal trading address is 195
Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5PS.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

          Gordon Thomson
          Stephanie Sutton
          RSM UK Restructuring Advisory LLP
          25 Farringdon Street
          London EC4A 4AB

Correspondence address & contact details of case manager:

          Samantha Hawkins
          RSM UK Restructuring Advisory LLP
          25 Farringdon Street
          London EC4A 4AB
          Tel No: 020-3201-8000

Alternative contact:

          The Joint Administrators
          Tel No: 020-3201-8000


INFRASAFE UK: KBL Advisory Named as Administrators
--------------------------------------------------
Infrasafe UK Limited was placed into administration proceedings in
the High Court of Justice Business and Property Court in Newcastle
Company & Insolvency List, No CR-2025-NCL-0001 of 2025, and Steven
Brown of KBL Advisory Limited was appointed as administrators on
January 16, 2025.  

Its registered office and principal trading address is at Unit 38
Design Works Business Centre, William Street, Gateshead, Tyne And
Wear, NE10 0JP.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

        Steven Brown
        KBL Advisory Limited
        Stamford House
        Northenden Road Sale
        Cheshire, M33 2DH

For further information, contact:

        Cherry Yau
        KBL Advisory Limited
        Tel No: 0161-637-8100
        Email: Cherry.Yau@kbl-advisory.com


PETFORD TOOLS: MHA MacIntyre Named as Administrators
----------------------------------------------------
Petford Tools Limited was placed into administration proceedings In
the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England
and Wales, Court Number: CR-2024-007079, and James Alexander
Snowdon and Georgina Marie Eason of MHA MacIntyre Hudson LLP were
appointed as administrators on Dec. 12, 2024.  

Petford Tools is a manufacturer of plastic products, fabricated
metal products, and machine tools.

Its registered office and principal trading address is at Peartree
Lane, Dudley, West Midlands, DY2 0QU.

The administrators can be reached at:

           Georgina Marie Eason
           James Alexander Snowdon
           MHA MacIntyre Hudson LLP
           6th Floor, 2 London Wall Place
           London, EC2Y 5AU

For further details, contact:

           James Holdsworth
           Email: james.holdsworth@mhllp.co.uk




===============
X X X X X X X X
===============

[*] BOOK REVIEW: Dangerous Dreamers
-----------------------------------
Dangerous Dreamers: The Financial Innovators from Charles Merrill
to Michael Milken

Author: Robert Sobel
Publisher: Beard Books
Softcover: 271 pages
List Price: $34.95

Order your own personal copy at
http://www.beardbooks.com/beardbooks/dangerous_dreamers.html   

"For the rest of his life, Milken will be accused of crimes for
which he was not charged and to which he did not plead guilty."
Milken is -- as anyone familiar with junk bonds and the scandals
surrounding them in the 1980s knows -- Michael Milken of the Drexel
Burnham banking and investment firm. In this book, noted business
writer Robert Sobel analyzes the Milken criminal case and the many
other phenomena of the period that lay the basis for the modern-day
financial industry. However, the author's perspective is broader
than the sensationalistic excesses and purported crimes of Milken
and his like. Sobel is interested in the individuals and businesses
that introduced and developed financial concepts, vehicles, and
transactions that increased the wealth of millions of average
persons.

Sobel's examination of the byplay between financial chicanery and
economic revitalization extends back to the Gilded Age of the
latter 1800s and early 1900s. This was a time when Jim Fisk, Jay
Gould, and others were making fortunes through skulduggery and
manipulation of the financial markets, while Cornelius Vanderbilt
and others were building the "world's finest railroad system."
Later, in the "Junk Decade of the 1980s," as Ivan Boesky and others
were reaping fortunes from "dubious" transactions, financial firms
such as Forstmann Little and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts "played major
positive roles in the largest restructuring of American industry
since the turn of the century."

While Sobel does not try to defend the excesses and illegalities of
individuals and companies, he basically sees the Milkens of the
world as "vehicles through which the phenomena of junk finance and
leveraged buyouts played themselves out." This was the
"Conglomerate Era." Mergers and acquisitions were at the center of
financial and economic activity, and CEOs at major corporations
were in competition to grow their corporations. Milken, Boesky, and
others provided the means for this end. However, it is important to
note that they did not originate the mergers and acquisition
phenomenon.

At first, Milken et al. were much appreciated by major corporations
and the financial industry. However, when mergers and acquisition
excesses began to bear sour fruit, Milken and his company Drexel
Burnham took the brunt of public indignation. The government's
search for villains then began.

Sobel examines the ripple effects of financial innovators who
became financial pariahs. Milken's journey, for example, cannot be
unraveled from that of a company such as Beatrice. Starting in
1960, the food company Beatrice started making large-scale
acquisitions. CEO Williams Karnes, who "ran a tight, lean ship,
with a small office staff," was succeeded by corporate heads who
brought in corporate jets and limousines, greatly increased staff,
and moved into regal office space. James Dutt of Beatrice is
singled out as symptomatic of the heedless mindset that crept into
corporate America in the 1980s.

Sobol's tale of the complexities and ambivalence of this
transitional period is bolstered by memorable portraits of key
players and companies. In so doing, he demonstrates once more why
he has long been recognized as one of the country's most important
business writers.

                         About the Author

Robert Sobel was born in 1931 and died in 1999. He was a prolific
historian of American business life, writing or editing more than
50 books and hundreds of articles and corporate profiles. He was a
professor of business at Hofstra University for 43 years and held a
Ph.D. from New York University. Besides producing books, articles,
book reviews, scripts for television and audiotapes, he was a
weekly columnist for Newsday from 1972 to 1988. At the time of his
death he was a contributing editor to Barron's Magazine.



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2025.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                * * * End of Transmission * * *