260324.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                 L A T I N   A M E R I C A

          Tuesday, March 24, 2026, Vol. 27, No. 59

                           Headlines



A R G E N T I N A

ARGENTINA: 4 in 10 Workers Informally Employed, UBA Report Says


B E R M U D A

INVESTMENT ENERGY: Moody's Outlook on 'Ba3' Notes Rating Now Stable


B O L I V I A

BOLIVIA: Moody's Ups Issuer Rating to Caa3, Alters Outlook to Pos.


B R A Z I L

RAIZEN FUELS: Fitch Lowers Rating on Sr. Unsecured Notes to 'C'
RAIZEN SA: Moody's Downgrades CFR to Ca, Alters Outlook to Stable
TRIDENT ENERGY: Fitch Affirms 'B+' Long-Term IDR, Outlook Stable
TUPY S.A.: S&P Cuts ICR to 'BB' Weaker Profitability; Outlook Neg.


D O M I N I C A N   R E P U B L I C

DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: Assesses Impact of Middle East Conflicts
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: Raises Gasoline and Diesel Prices by RD$10


P U E R T O   R I C O

RB MARKETPLACE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
SN TRANSPORT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

                           - - - - -


=================
A R G E N T I N A
=================

ARGENTINA: 4 in 10 Workers Informally Employed, UBA Report Says
---------------------------------------------------------------
Buenos Aires Times reports that in the fourth quarter of last year,
Argentina's labour informality rate stood at 43 percent -- meaning
that more than four in ten workers are in jobs not covered by
relevant labor, tax and social security legislation.

The INDEC national statistics bureau reported that unemployment
rose to 7.5 percent in the final quarter of 2025, according to
Buenos Aires Times.  Year-on-year, according to the agency, the
unemployment rate increased by around one percentage point, the
report notes.

The findings come from a report coordinated by Roxana Maurizio and
Luis Beccaria, produced by the Employment, Distribution and Labour
Institutions Area (EDIL) of the Interdisciplinary Institute of
Political Economy (IIEP) at the University of Buenos Aires (UBA)
Faculty of Economics, the report relays.

According to the study, 32 percent of informal workers live in poor
households, while a further 27 percent are considered vulnerable to
falling into poverty, the report discloses.

The indicators show that seven in ten workers aged between 16 and
24 are in informal employment, reflecting the difficulties this
group faces in entering the labour market, the report notes.

Young people experience a significantly higher informality rate
than other age groups, the report says.

In the third quarter of 2025, the rate for this group stood at 67.4
percent, nearly 24 percentage points higher than the overall rate,
the report notes.

By contrast, workers aged between 45 and 64 (60 in the case of
women) have the lowest informality rate, at 34.2 percent, followed
by those aged 25 to 44 (42.2 percent) and those aged 65 and over
(57.8 percent), the report says.

In other words, the highest incidence of informality occurs both at
the beginning and the end of working life, the report relays.

Most informal workers are concentrated in Greater Buenos Aires, the
report discloses.

Argentina's informality rate -- matching levels recorded in the
second quarter of 2008 -- has remained persistently high for 17
years, the report notes.

Compared with nine Latin American countries, a region characterised
by labour informality and precarious employment, Argentina ranks
fourth, behind Chile, Brazil and Costa Rica, the report adds.

                       About Argentina

Argentina is a country located mostly in the southern half of
South America. Its capital is Buenos Aires. Javier Milei is the
current president of Argentina after winning the November 19,
2023 general election. He succeeded Alberto Angel Fernandez
in the position.

Argentina has the third largest economy in Latin America.  The
country's economy is an upper middle-income economy for fiscal
year 2019, according to the World Bank.  Historically, however,
its economic performance has been very uneven, with high economic
growth alternating with severe recessions, income maldistribution
and in the recent decades, increasing poverty.

In March 2022, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) approved a
30-month arrangement under an Extended Fund Facility for Argentina
in the amount of SDR 31.914 billion (equivalent to US$44 billion,
or 1000 percent of quota) -- with an approved immediate
disbursement of an equivalent of US$9.65 billion.  Argentina's
IMF-supported program sought to improve public finances and start
to reduce persistent high inflation through a multi-pronged
strategy.

On April 11, 2025, the IMF further approved a 48-month Extended
Fund Facility (EFF) arrangement for Argentina totaling US$20
billion (or 479 percent of quota), with an immediate disbursement
of US$12 billion, and a first review planned for June
2025 with an associated disbursement of about US$2 billion.  The
program is expected to help catalyze additional official
multilateral and bilateral support, and a timely re-access to
international capital markets.

Moody's Ratings on July 17, 2025, upgraded Argentina's
long-term foreign currency and local currency issuer ratings to
Caa1 from Caa3 and changed the outlook to stable from positive.
The upgrade reflects Moody's views that the extensive
liberalization of exchange and (to a lesser extent) capital
controls, alongside a new International Monetary Fund (IMF)
program, support the availability of hard currency liquidity and
ease pressure on external finances. This reduces the likelihood of
a credit event. In January 2025, Moody's raised Argentina's local
currency ceiling  to B3 from Caa1 and the foreign currency ceiling
to Caa1 from Caa3.  

Fitch Ratings, on May 12, 2025, upgraded Argentina's Long-Term
Foreign-Currency and Local-Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to
'CCC+' from 'CCC'. S&P Global Ratings, in February 2025 lowered
its local currency sovereign credit ratings on Argentina to
'SD/SD' from 'CCC/C' and its national scale rating to 'SD' from
'raB+'. DBRS, Inc. upgraded Argentina's Long-Term Foreign and Local
Currency Issuer Ratings to B (low) from CCC in November 2024.



=============
B E R M U D A
=============

INVESTMENT ENERGY: Moody's Outlook on 'Ba3' Notes Rating Now Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings affirmed the Ba3 rating assigned to Investment
Energy Resources Limited (IERL) senior secured notes, and changed
its outlook to stable from negative.

RATINGS RATIONALE

IERL's rating outlook change to stable from negative reflects the
strengthening of its financial performance in 2025. The improvement
is supported by the resolution of technical issues at the Renace
hydroelectric assets during late 2024 and 2025, as well as more
favorable hydrology and weather conditions that increased
generation by almost 19% compared with 2024. Portfolio availability
rose to 92.1% in 2025 from 86.6% in 2024. Higher availability and
generation in 2025 boosted interest coverage, measured as (FFO +
interest expense) / interest expense, to 4.0x in September 2025
from 2.4x in December 2024, while leverage, measured as FFO / net
debt, improved to 22.7% from 10.4%.

The company's Ba3 rating reflects the diversification of its
renewable portfolio across Central America and its largely
contracted capacity, with an average remaining term of 10 years on
its power purchase agreements, supporting cash flow predictability.
Constraining IERL's rating is the relatively weaker credit quality
of its PPA off takers, that are primarily based in Guatemala and
Honduras. Moody's also notes its $700 million maturity due in 2029
along with a flexible cash retention policy, which adds refinancing
risk.

The rating action acknowledges the continued uncertainty deriving
from the ongoing arbitration process initiated in 2023 by a
minority shareholder of Renace. This arbitration constitutes a
contingent liability of IERL with limited visibility on resolution
timing and potential outcomes. Nonetheless, Moody's views the
issuer's stronger cash flow generation and liquidity providing some
financial flexibility to mitigate this contingent risk.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's views that IERL will maintain
stable and visible cash flow that will support projected financial
metrics. Specifically, Moody's projects FFO/net debt and the
interest coverage ratio to remain above 12% and 3.0x, respectively,
for the next 12-18 months.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Moody's could upgrade IERL's ratings if the company reduces its
debt balances or increases its cash flow generation such that it
consistently records FFO/Net debt of more than 20% and a cash
interest coverage ratio of more than 3.0x. A rating upgrade would
also depend on Moody's assessments of IERL's off-takers' credit
quality being consistent with a higher rating. An upgrade would
also consider the track record of balanced dividend distributions,
allowing the company to gradually expand its financial flexibility
ahead of debt maturities, and a favorable resolution of its
arbitration process.

A materially unfavorable resolution of the arbitration process or
weak financial performance of IERL would trigger a downgrade.
Moody's could downgrade IERL's ratings if the company's FFO/net
debt is less than 12%, or the interest coverage ratio is less than
2.5x, all on a sustained basis. Moody's assessments of a weaker
credit profile of IERL's off-takers could also trigger a rating
downgrade. Also, failure to adequately address the $700 million
refinancing due in 2029 well in advance, resulting in heightened
refinancing risk, would also lead to downward rating pressure.

PROFILE

Investment Energy Resources Limited (IERL) is the entity through
which Corporacion Multi Inversiones (CMI), a conglomerate with
operations in Central America and the Caribbean, owns the operating
assets of its energy business unit (CMI Energia).

IERL and its subsidiaries control a total of 760 megawatts (MW) of
installed capacity through five hydropower plants, eight wind
plants and four solar plants. These assets are located in
Government of Guatemala (Ba1 stable), Government of Honduras (B1
stable), Government of Costa Rica (Ba2 stable), Government of
Nicaragua (B2 stable) and the Government of Dominican Republic (Ba2
stable).

LIST OF AFFECTED RATINGS

Issuer: Investment Energy Resources Limited (IERL)

Affirmations:

LT Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba3

Senior Secured, Affirmed Ba3

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Unregulated
Utilities and Power Companies published in August 2025.

The net effect of any adjustments applied to rating factor scores
or scorecard outputs under the primary methodology(ies), if any,
was not material to the ratings addressed in this announcement.



=============
B O L I V I A
=============

BOLIVIA: Moody's Ups Issuer Rating to Caa3, Alters Outlook to Pos.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings has upgraded the Government of Bolivia's issuer and
senior unsecured ratings to Caa3 from Ca, and changed the outlook
to positive from stable.

The upgrade to Caa3 reflects a reduction in near-term default risks
following the political transition in late 2025, which has allowed
foreign-exchange reserves to rise to levels that Moody's views as
sufficient to cover upcoming external bond payments. This
improvement is supported by explicit government statements
confirming the authorities' intention to meet near-term external
debt service owed to private sector participants using available
dollar reserves. The transition has also increased the likelihood
of policy adjustments and improved the sovereign's ability to
secure official sector financing. Notwithstanding these positive
developments, the low rating indicates that a default over the next
few years is still a possibility, given large macroeconomic
imbalances, thin external buffers and reserves heavily skewed
toward gold, with debt service peaking in 2028.

The positive outlook reflects Moody's views that risks have shifted
in favor of macroeconomic stabilization which would further reduce
default risk and point to a higher rating. The pipeline of
multilateral loan disbursements, if they materialize as Moody's
expects, would not only ease near-term liquidity pressures but it
would also give the authorities greater policy space to sustain
early stabilization gains and pursue a structural adjustment path,
particularly through fiscal consolidation and exchange rate
normalization. The positive outlook further incorporates upside
potential from a possible IMF arrangement that would provide
sizable balance of payments support and act as a confidence
catalyst that improves the availability and predictability of
external financing, strengthens reserve dynamics, reduces external
vulnerability and credit event risk.

Concurrent to the action, Moody's have also raised Bolivia's local
and foreign currency country ceilings to Caa1 and Caa2, from Caa2
and Caa3, respectively. The two-notch gap between the
local-currency ceiling and the issuer rating captures the risk that
the policymaking environment could be disrupted particularly if
political events or social tensions intensify. Bolivia's weak
institutional framework and significant government footprint in the
economy heighten uncertainty around the continuity and
predictability of policy. The one-notch gap between the FC and LC
ceiling reflects persistent balance of payment pressures and very
low policy effectiveness.

RATINGS RATIONALE

RATIONALE FOR THE UPGRADE TO Caa3

IMPROVEMENT IN NEAR TERM DEFAULT RISKS FOLLOWING THE POLITICAL
TRANSITION IN LATE 2025

Near term default risks have declined following Bolivia's political
leadership shift in late 2025, which marked a decisive change in
policy priorities and direction. The election of President Rodrigo
Paz represents a material change away from the previous governing
policy model and has increased the likelihood of policy
adjustments, strengthening engagement with multilateral
institutions, supporting improved prospects for official sector
financing, a rebuilding of foreign exchange reserves, and explicit
commitments to meet near term private external debt service, all of
which have materially improved the sovereign's liquidity position
and reduced credit event risk for private sector debt holders.

Early measures by the new administration include the removal of
fuel subsidies, a key macroeconomic distortion. While the reform
has resulted in significant increases in domestic fuel prices, it
addresses a fiscal burden that the IMF estimated at nearly 4% of
GDP (mostly gasoline and diesel) in direct costs in 2024, with
broader economic costs exceeding 5% of GDP. The measure supports
fiscal consolidation and signals greater willingness to address
long standing economic imbalances.

International reserves increased to around $4.4 billion in January
2026 from $2.7 billion in July 2025. While higher gold prices and
continued gold accumulation have largely supported this rise,
foreign exchange reserves have climbed to nearly $500 million from
just $67 million over the same period, a meaningful improvement in
liquidity given their usability for balance of payments support
relative to gold, bolstering external shock absorption capacity.

The authorities have also announced a liability management
operation involving only the exchange of bonds held by domestic
public sector entities, while continuing to service private sector
held debt on time and in full. If executed as announced, the
operation would extend maturities for public sector bond holders
participating in the exchange and reduce external amortization
pressures for the sovereign, while preserving US-dollar liquidity.
A similar offer including the private sector may have constituted a
distressed exchange under Moody's definitions, assuming a repayment
below par and given that the exchange significantly alleviates
external liquidity pressures in light of the still low level of
foreign exchange reserves.

The government intends to exchange, through privately negotiated
transactions, approximately 67% of the aggregate principal amount
of its 2028 and 2030 bonds with two domestic public-sector
entities, the Banco Central de Bolivia and the public pension fund
administrator, La Gestora. The replacement instruments are expected
to be medium term, governed by Bolivian law, and denominated in
bolivianos and/or local currency indexed to the US dollar (MVDOL),
thereby shifting both jurisdiction and currency denomination. For
private holders, representing the remaining 33% of the outstanding
stock, Moody's expects that, in line with their statements, the
authorities will continue to service the debt without changes to
existing terms, including the upcoming March 20 payment of about
$130 million. The March 02 interest payment of around $32 million
on the 2030 bonds was made on time and in full.

MULTILATERAL RE-ENGAGEMENT PROVIDES FINANCING PIPELINE THAT
SUPPORTS STABILIZATION EFFORTS

Multilateral financing prospects have improved materially after the
political transition, both in scale and breadth of intended use.
Development banks have cumulatively pledged over $8 billion in
funding over the next 5 years.

Corporacion Andina de Fomento (CAF, Aa3 positive) has expanded a
near term liquidity facility into a multi-year strategic framework.
A 2025–2030 Country Strategy sets a financing floor of $3.1
billion through 2030, with about 30% described as already in
execution. Inter-American Development Bank (IADB, Aaa stable) and
Inter-American Investment Corporation (IDB Invest, Aa1 stable)
pledged a $4.5 billion financing framework for 2026–2028 that is
described as six times the previous allocation to Bolivia, with
around $2 billion expected to be deployed in the first year.

The financing strategy also emphasizes that a meaningful portion of
lending under discussion across multilaterals is intended to
catalyze not only public but also private sector investments in
transport, energy and infrastructure.If executed effectively and
paired with continued improvements in the operating environment,
this comprehensive approach would lift the country's  investment
and support economic growth.

RATIONALE FOR THE POSITIVE OUTLOOK

The positive outlook reflects Moody's views that risks have shifted
in favor of macroeconomic stabilization, supported by a pipeline of
multilateral disbursements.

The outlook also incorporates upside potential from a possible IMF
arrangement, as Bolivia is reportedly in discussions with the Fund
regarding a multiyear program that could include front-loaded
disbursements and provide sizable balance-of-payments support. Such
a program would act as a confidence catalyst by improving the
availability and predictability of external financing,
strengthening reserve dynamics, reducing external vulnerability and
credit-event risk, and underpinning a more durable stabilization
framework. Moody's expects an IMF program to facilitate the
Bolivian authorities' execution of structural adjustment measures
aimed at addressing key macroeconomic imbalances and distortions,
including those related to parallel exchange-rate regimes,
inflationary pressures, reliance on central bank financing, and the
recurrent use of gold monetization as a source of foreign-exchange
liquidity. However, terms have not been finalized, and the
political sensitivity of likely policy actions—particularly
around exchange-rate policy and continued subsidy reform—creates
meaningful execution risk, especially given the possibility of
protests and blockades to disrupt policy implementation.

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, GOVERNANCE (ESG) CONSIDERATIONS

Bolivia's CIS-5 score indicates that the sovereign rating is lower
than it would have been if ESG risk exposures did not exist and
that the negative impact is more pronounced than for issuers scored
CIS-4. For Bolivia, this reflects its very weak governance profile
which significantly weighs on the rating.

Bolivia's E-4 score reflects exposure to environmental risks that
are driven by risks related to carbon transition and natural
resources management. The government and overall economy's high
reliance on hydrocarbon sector revenues and exports exposes the
sovereign to significant carbon transition risks. Natural resources
mining, water management, increased deforestation and forest fires
in the Bolivian Amazon rainforest also contribute to material
environmental risks.

Bolivia's S-4 score reflects exposure to social risks that stem
from a long-history of relatively high levels of poverty, economic
inequality, and social exclusion. Despite material improvements in
recent years, Bolivia is characterized by relatively high levels of
poverty, limited educational outcomes, and lack of sufficient
access to basic services and housing. Like many other emerging
economies, Bolivia benefits from a benign demographic structure.

Bolivia's G-5 score reflects the influence of very weak policy
effectiveness, weak institutional arrangements, a high incidence of
corruption and a generally weak rule of law on overall governance.

GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$):  11,245 (2024) (also known as Per
Capita Income)

Real GDP growth (% change):  0.7% (2024) (also known as GDP
Growth)

Inflation Rate (CPI, % change Dec/Dec):  10% (2024)

Gen. Gov. Financial Balance/GDP:  -11.2% (2024) (also known as
Fiscal Balance)

Current Account Balance/GDP:  -2.8% (2024) (also known as External
Balance)

External debt/GDP:  38.1% (2024)

Economic resiliency:  b2

Default history:  At least one default event (on bonds and/or
loans) has been recorded since 1983.

On March 17, 2026, a rating committee was called to discuss the
rating of the Bolivia, Government of. The main points raised during
the discussion were: The issuer's economic fundamentals, including
its economic strength, have not materially changed. The issuer's
institutions and governance strength, have not materially changed.
The issuer's fiscal or financial strength, including its debt
profile, has not materially changed. The issuer has become less
susceptible to event risks.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Moody's could upgrade Bolivia's ratings if policy measures foster a
sustained increase in liquid foreign-exchange reserves and prove
effective in durably reducing external and fiscal imbalances,
including by reinforcing near-term external payment capacity as
debt service rises. In this scenario, the probability of default
would decline further. Over time, structural reforms that improve
the productivity of the hydrocarbon sector, support
diversification, and strengthen medium-term growth prospects would
provide additional support to Bolivia's credit profile.

The outlook could return to stable if the recent improvement in
external liquidity and the availability of official financing does
not translate into a more durable stabilization path which would
keep default a meaningful possibility over the medium term. This
could occur if expected multilateral disbursements are delayed or
fall short, or if policy implementation weakens such that external
and fiscal imbalances are not materially reduced, increasing the
risk of renewed policy reversal and a loss of confidence. Downward
pressure on the rating would arise if the liability management
operation is not executed as intended and involves the private
sector investors, or if authorities fail to prevent renewed
significant declines in foreign-exchange reserves and a worsening
of external and government liquidity pressures, materially
increasing the likelihood of default or debt restructuring
resulting in losses exceeding 65%.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Sovereigns
published in November 2022.

The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology
used in this credit rating action, if applicable.

The net effect of any adjustments applied to rating factor scores
or scorecard outputs under the primary methodology(ies), if any,
was not material to the ratings addressed in this announcement.



===========
B R A Z I L
===========

RAIZEN FUELS: Fitch Lowers Rating on Sr. Unsecured Notes to 'C'
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded Raizen S.A.'s and Raizen Energia
S.A.'s (jointly, Raizen) Long-Term Foreign and Local Currency
Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) to 'C' from 'CCC. Fitch has also
downgraded Raizen Fuels Finance S.A.'s senior unsecured notes due
in 2027, 2032, 2034, 2035, 2037 and 2054 to 'C' from 'CCC' with a
Recovery Rating of 'RR4' to all instruments.

Additionally, Fitch has downgraded Raizen's National Long-Term
Ratings and its second, third and fourth debentures issued by
Raizen S.A. and fourth and fifth debentures issued by Raizen
Energia S.A to 'C(bra)' from 'CCC(bra)'.

On March 11, 2026 Raizen announced that it had entered into an
agreement with some of its creditors for an out-of-court debt
restructuring plan. The plan may include a partial conversion of
debt into equity, a debt exchange into new instruments and capital
injections, among other corporate reorganization initiatives.

Raizen has 90 days to conclude the restructuring plan by securing
approval from creditors holding more than 50% of senior unsecured
debt. Once approved, the plan will bind all senior unsecured
creditors to the same conditions. During this period, the company
has a standstill agreement.

Fitch considers Raizen to be in a default-like process.

If Raizen formally announces the conclusion of the out-of-court
restructuring plan, Fitch will downgrade the ratings to 'RD' to
reflect a restricted default and will assign ratings incorporating
the new capital structure and business plan.

Key Rating Drivers

Out-of-Court Restructuring Plan: Raizen's petition for an
out-of-court restructuring plan has the support of a portion of its
senior unsecured creditors. The supporters represent about 47% of
the company's total senior unsecured creditors with about BRL 30.7
billion in debt. The plan provides Raizen a 90-day standstill for
all senior unsecured lenders, during which it will have to secure
the participation of more unsecured creditors to reach a simple
majority of the creditors in this class and bind all unsecured
creditors, ~BRL 65.1 billion, to the same terms and conditions.
Fitch considers this as a default-like process.

The restructuring plan does not affect Raízen Group's obligations
toward customers, suppliers, distributors, or other commercial
partners that are essential to its operations. Senior secured
lenders with fiduciary liens and ACC (Advance on Foreign Exchange
Contracts) creditors are not subject to the plan as well.

Corporate Rating Tool Inputs and Scores

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its Corporate Rating Tool
(CRT) to produce the Standalone Credit Profile (SCP):

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bbb, Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb,
Moderate), Diversification and Asset Quality (bbb, Moderate),
Company Operational Characteristics (bbb-, Lower), Profitability
(ccc, Moderate), Financial Structure (ccc-, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (ccc, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on standard CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the latest historical
year 2024, 40% for the forecast year 2025 and 40% for the forecast
year 2026.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'bb' results in no
adjustment.

- The other risk elements adjustment applies and results in an
adjustment of -3 notch(es).

- The SCP is 'c'.

- No adjustments made to SCP resulting in a Local and Foreign
currency IDRs of 'C'.

To derive the IDR: C

Recovery Analysis

The recovery analysis assumes Raizen would be reorganized as a
going-concern (GC) in bankruptcy rather than be liquidated. Fitch
has assumed a 10% administrative claim. The GC EBITDA assumption is
about BRL10 billion.

An enterprise value (EV) multiple of 5x EBITDA is applied to the GC
EBITDA to calculate a post-reorganization EV. Fitch uses a multiple
of 5x that reflects the sector dynamics and the company's business
profile.

Due to the 'RR4' country cap for Brazilian corporates, Fitch caps
the recovery rating on the senior unsecured notes at 'RR4', despite
potential higher projected recoveries.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

- The formal announcement of the approval of the Out-of-Court
Restructuring Plan;

- Missed payment of any financial obligations after the expiration
of cure periods.

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

- Fitch will reassess the IDRs upon the completion of a debt
restructuring; the IDRs would reflect the new capital structure and
credit profile.

Liquidity and Debt Structure

Raizen has just applied for an out-of-court restructuring plan.
Fitch will monitor liquidity and debt structure under the plan.

Issuer Profile

Raizen is the leading S&E producer and the second-largest fuel
distributor in Brazil with a presence in Argentina. The company is
a joint venture controlled by Shell Plc and Cosan S.A.

MACROECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND SECTOR FORECASTS

Fitch's latest quarterly Global Corporates Sector Forecasts Monitor
data file which aggregates key data points used in its credit
analysis. Fitch's macroeconomic forecasts, commodity price
assumptions, default rate forecasts, sector key performance
indicators and sector-level forecasts are among the data items
included.

Climate Vulnerability Signals

The results of its Climate.VS screener did not indicate an elevated
risk for Raizen S.A..

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt              Rating           Recovery   Prior
   -----------              ------           --------   -----
Raizen Fuels
Finance S.A.

   senior
   unsecured       LT        C   Downgrade    RR4       CCC

Raizen S.A.        LT IDR    C   Downgrade              CCC
                   LC LT IDR C   Downgrade              CCC
                   Natl LT C(bra)Downgrade              CCC(bra)

   senior
   unsecured       Natl LT C(bra)Downgrade              CCC(bra)

Raizen
Energia S.A.       LT IDR    C   Downgrade              CCC
                   LC LT IDR C   Downgrade              CCC
                   Natl LT C(bra)Downgrade              CCC(bra)

   senior  
   unsecured       Natl LT C(bra)Downgrade              CCC(bra)

RAIZEN SA: Moody's Downgrades CFR to Ca, Alters Outlook to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings downgraded to Ca from Caa3 the Long Term Corporate
Family Rating of Raizen S.A. (Raizen). Concurrently, Moody's
downgraded to Ca from Caa3 the $187 million backed senior unsecured
notes rating due 2027 issued by Raizen Fuels Finance S.A. and
guaranteed by Raizen S.A. and Raizen Energia S.A. The outlook
changed to stable from negative.

The downgrade follows the 180 days standstill granted by a São
Paulo Bankruptcy and Judicial Reorganization Court to Raizen under
a proposed out-of-court restructuring plan with the initial
approval of 47% of the creditors included in the agreement. Moody's
considers the beginning of the standstill as distressed exchange
and Moody's expects Raizen to refrain from paying interest and
amortizations on the debts included in the agreement during the
negotiation period. Debts in the agreement include cross-border
bonds, local debentures, agricultural receivables certificates,
rural producer financial notes, export credit notes, pre-payment of
exports and other financial debt. Outside the scope of this group
of creditors Raizen plans to maintain the normality in transactions
with other creditors and stakeholders including employees, clients,
suppliers, distributors, and partners.  

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ca rating incorporates the standstill on certain debts of
Raizen which Moody's considers as a distressed exchange. The
ratings also incorporate a deterioration of Raizen's credit
metrics, high leverage and sustained negative cash flow generation,
given the high interest burden and still weaker than usual results
on the sugar-ethanol core segment – below potential crushing
level and lower cost dilution in 2025-26. The current debt level
continues to impose significant constraints on the business,
challenging Raizen's ability to sustain positive cash generation.
Moody's do not foresee a significant recovery in the near term and
expect leverage to close the harvest at over 5.9x with sustained
negative free cash flow. In Moody's views, improved credit metrics
along with a solid liquidity are necessary to mitigate the inherent
volatility of the commodity markets to which the company is exposed
in sugar-ethanol business. The sugar-ethanol business in particular
requires relatively large capex to support the quality of
plantations and agricultural productivity, while being exposed to
considerable event risk including weather conditions.

Governance is a key factor in the rating assessment and the present
situation is a direct outcome of the strategies pursued during the
pre-turnaround cycle, which focused on an aggressive, debt-driven
growth strategy that pushed leverage up.

Raizen's fundamental profile still incorporates its solid position
in the sugar cane and fuel distribution businesses in Brazil.
Raizen is a joint venture between Cosan S.A. and Shell Plc. At the
present moment Moody's do not incorporate any direct support by
shareholders, but recognize that Raizen benefits from its ownership
by Shell Brazil Holdings BV, a 100% subsidiary of Shell, derived
from Shell's brand and managerial expertise, and Cosan, given its
local expertise and execution track record. The ratings consider
the existence of cross guarantees between Raizen Energia and Raizen
in most debt instruments.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations that Raizen will
maintain its operations during the standstill period and that
negotiation with creditors will help the company to improve its
capital structure while limiting losses to creditors.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Moody's could downgrade Raizen's rating if the recovery prospects
for the company's creditors deteriorate.

An upgrade could occur if Raizen is able to improve its capital
structure substantially reducing its debt balance, sustaining an
adequate liquidity and a consistent operational performance.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Protein and
Agriculture published in October 2025.

Raizen's Ca rating is seven notches below the Ba3
scorecard-indicated outcome by Moody's Protein and Agriculture
methodology in the twelve months ended in September 2025. Current
ratings incorporate the uncertainty regarding an equity injection
and measures to improve Raizen capital structure which could be
considered a distressed exchange.

TRIDENT ENERGY: Fitch Affirms 'B+' Long-Term IDR, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Trident Energy, L.P.'s Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) at 'B+' with a Stable Outlook. Fitch has also
affirmed the 'B+' senior unsecured rating on the notes issued by
Trident Energy Finance PLC and guaranteed by Trident Energy, L.P.
The recovery rating on the notes is 'RR4'.

The affirmation reflects its expectation of gradually improving
production in Brazil (BB/Stable) and Equatorial Guinea and stable
production in the Republic of Congo leading to total volumes and
EBITDA generation in-line with the 'B+' rating through the cycle.

Trident's rating also reflects its geographic concentration, strong
reserve life, low financial leverage, strong cash flow generation
and some execution risk to its ability to increase production
volumes.

Key Rating Drivers

Production Underperformance: Trident's assets in Brazil and
Equatorial Guinea continue to face operational issues related to
their top-side infrastructure, which has affected uptime and has
led the assets to produce at lower rates than otherwise possible.
Fitch therefore assumes production from these assets to remain at
30,000-35,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (kboe/d) through
2026. Fitch expects Trident's planned infrastructure upgrades to
allow production to increase to about 40kboe/d in 2027 and about
50kboe/d in 2028 and thereafter, although this is subject to
significant execution risk.

Fitch expects production volumes to remain volatile and be the key
constraint to the rating; therefore, Fitch put more weight on
near-term forecast performance to better reflect this uncertainty.

Congo Performing as Expected: The Congo assets have so far been
performing in-line with its initial expectations. The assets have
stable production levels, and Fitch expects they will contribute
28-30kboe/d to the company's production volumes. Fitch does not
consider the planned Floating Liquefied Natural Gas (FLNG) project
in its forecast as this has yet to receive the final investment
decision and is booked as a contingent resource. Successful
development of this project would be an upside to its projections.

Geographic Concentration: Trident's production is somewhat
concentrated in Africa, namely the Republic of Congo (around 49% of
2025E volumes) and Equitorial Guinea (around 14%). Fitch views the
operating environments in both Congo and Equitorial Guinea as less
favourable than that of its other main geographic segment, Brazil,
and Fitch factors the increased exposure to them into Trident's
'B+' rating. However, Fitch continues to apply Brazil's Country
Ceiling to the rating, as Fitch expects EBITDA from Brazil's assets
will sufficiently cover Trident's gross interest costs.

Fiscal Optimisation Continues: During 2024 Trident successfully
negotiated the removal of the ICMS state tax recharge on
Brazil-produced volumes; this eliminated an about 13% discount from
realised pricing on these volumes as of the start of 2024. The
company is also negotiating another offtake agreement in Brazil and
has commissioned a floating storage and offloading vessel to be
able to freely market its production globally.

Contingent ICMS Liability: As part of the removal of the ICMS tax
recharge, Trident indemnified Petrobras against a potential adverse
ruling by the state's tax authority until April 2025. Trident has
therefore recorded a contingent liability of USD173 million as of
3Q25 (including interest). Fitch views positively the lack of any
negative developments in 2025, and the company's robust liquidity
and cash flow generation, which should be more than sufficient to
absorb any outflows related to this contingent liability. Fitch
does not expect any related cash outflows over its rating case.

Adequate Reserves: At end-2025, Trident's 2P reserves were 307
million boe (mmboe), implying a reserve life of 15 years. This is
likely to decline once production ramps up on a more sustained
basis, but Fitch does not expect reserve life to become a
constraint to the current rating.

Strong Cash Flow Generation: Trident's assets are higher cost, with
Fitch-defined unit opex of over USD25/b. However, this will decline
to about USD20/b once production improves in Brazil and Equatorial
Guinea, and capex needs are low, reflecting the lack of greenfield
projects and exploration spending. The payback period for
development and optimisation projects is also relatively short,
supporting positive free cash flow generation after dividends for
2025-2029.

Low Leverage: Fitch expects Trident to maintain low leverage
through the cycle, with average EBITDA gross leverage of about 1.4x
and average EBITDA net leverage of about 1.1x between 2025 and
2029. Fitch expects that Trident will continue to fund all capex
from internal sources. Fitch further assumes that dividends will
start in 2027 and will be sized to maintain leverage generally in
line with the company-defined 1.0x net debt/EBITDAX target set by
management in years without significant M&A or operational
disruptions.

Peer Analysis

Fitch rates Trident one notch below Energean plc (BB-/Stable) and
Ithaca Energy plc (BB-/Stable), and in line with SierraCol Energy
Limited (B+/Stable).

Trident's through-the-cycle production of 60-70kboe/d is much
higher than that of SierraCol (45kboe/d). Energean has materially
higher production of 154kboe/d as of 2025, as does Ithaca at
119kboe/d.

Trident's end-2025 2P reserves base of 307mmboe is lower than
Ithaca's (over 350mmboe at end-2025), and materially smaller than
Energean's 2P reserves (about 1.1 billion boe at end-2024).
However, it is still larger than SierraCol's 128mmboe. Trident's
production and reserves are better diversified geographically than
those of its peers, which typically have most of their producing
assets in a single country.

Fitch expects Trident to maintain very low leverage, with EBITDA
net leverage averaging about 1.1x until 2029 and EBITDA gross
leverage averaging 1.5x. This is substantially lower than the
through-the-cycle leverage of its main peers.

Fitch’s Key Rating-Case Assumptions

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

- Brent crude oil price to 2028 in line with its base case price
deck

- Production increase from 63kboe/d in 2026 to 76kboe/d in 2029

- Capex averaging about USD340 million a year to 2029

- Earn-out payments averaging about USD55 million a year to 2028

- Dividend payments starting in 2027

Corporate Rating Tool Inputs and Scores

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its Corporate Rating Tool
to produce the Standalone Credit Profile (SCP):

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb+, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bb, Lower), Market and Competitive Positioning (b, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (b+, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (b, Moderate), Profitability (b,
Higher), Financial Structure (a+, Moderate), and Financial
Flexibility (bb, Lower).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom
Corporate Rating Tool financial period parameters: 10% weight for
the historical year 2024, 20% for the forecast year 2025, 30% for
the forecast year 2026, 20% for the forecast year 2027 and 20% for
the forecast year 2028.

- 'B+' to 'CC' considerations apply in its analysis and result in
no adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'bb+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'.

Recovery Analysis

Fitch's Key Assumptions for Recovery Analysis

Its recovery analysis assumes that Trident would be reorganised as
a going concern (GC) in bankruptcy rather than liquidated.

Trident's GC EBITDA of USD400 million reflects its view on EBITDA
generation from the group's assets in Brazil, Equatorial Guinea and
Congo, assuming a sustained period of low Brent prices.

Fitch has applied an enterprise value (EV)/EBITDA multiple of 3.5x
to calculate a GC EV, reflecting the risks associated with the
small size and assets located in less favourable jurisdictions.

The USD600 million senior unsecured notes are subordinated to the
USD700 million combined reserve-based loan (RBL) and about USD84
million of liabilities related to deferred consideration still
payable. The notes are guaranteed on a senior basis by Trident, and
on a senior subordinated basis by several restricted subsidiaries
owning the assets in Brazil and Equatorial Guinea, and the Congo
assets.

Its analysis, after deducting 10% for administrative claims and
taking into account its Country-Specific Treatment of Recovery
Ratings Criteria, generated a waterfall-generated recovery
computation (WGRC) in the 'RR4' band, indicating a 'B+' instrument
rating.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

- EBITDA gross leverage above 2x or EBITDA net leverage above 1.5x
on a sustained basis;

- Failure to maintain production above 50kboe/d on a sustained
basis;

- Aggressive shareholder distributions or deteriorating liquidity;

- EBITDA from Brazil failing to cover gross interest expense.

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

- Establishing a record of production well over 75kboe/d on a
sustained basis;

- EBITDA gross leverage below 1x or EBITDA net leverage below 0.5x
on a sustained basis.

Liquidity and Debt Structure

As of 30 September 2025, Trident had unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents of USD125 million and an undrawn RBL of USD175 million.
During 4Q25, the company refinanced its RBL and the USD360 million
Congo acquisition facility, combining them into one corporate RBL
with a total facility size of USD700 million. As of end-2025, about
USD300 million was available under the facility with estimated
total liquidity of about USD470 million. Fitch expects these
amounts, positive free cash flow generation and minimal near-term
debt maturities to provide adequate liquidity runway for Trident.

The new RBL facility has a final maturity date of 2031, although
this is subject to the company's 2029 senior unsecured bonds being
refinanced at least six months before their maturity (November
2029). Should this refinancing not take place, the RBL's final
maturity will automatically reset to three months before the bond's
maturity (August 2029). The facility will begin to amortise in 1Q27
with subsequent reductions in commitments each March and September
by USD70 million on each reduction date.

Issuer Profile

Trident is a small oil and gas producer with three assets in
Brazil, Equatorial Guinea and the Republic of Congo.

MACROECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND SECTOR FORECASTS

Fitch's latest quarterly Global Corporates Sector Forecasts Monitor
data file which aggregates key data points used in its credit
analysis. Fitch's macroeconomic forecasts, commodity price
assumptions, default rate forecasts, sector key performance
indicators and sector-level forecasts are among the data items
included.

Climate Vulnerability Signals

The Climate.VS for 2035 for Trident Energy, L.P. is 51, which is
average for oil and gas producers.

Key transition risks arise from potential demand reductions due to
policies aimed at decreasing oil and gas use in the global economy,
and, in the shorter term, from policies designed to limit
greenhouse gas emissions from oil and gas production.

At the moment, these risks do not have a material influence on the
rating, given the very long-term timescale over which the
transition may take place, uncertainty regarding the extent and
nature of changes, and how markets and companies will react to
them.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt                 Rating           Recovery   Prior
   -----------                 ------           --------   -----
Trident Energy, L.P.     LT IDR B+  Affirmed               B+

Trident Energy
Finance PLC

   senior unsecured      LT     B+  Affirmed     RR4       B+

TUPY S.A.: S&P Cuts ICR to 'BB' Weaker Profitability; Outlook Neg.
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit and issue level
ratings on Tupy S.A. to 'BB' from 'BB+'. The '3' recovery rating is
unchanged.

The negative outlook reflects S&P's view of uncertainties over the
demand rebound this year, which could limit the expected
improvements in the company's profitability and credit metrics.

Weaker-than-expected profitability in the last quarter of 2025
prompted us to revise down again our forecast for 2026.

Tupy's weaker-than-expected profitability in the last quarter of
2025 led S&P to revise down again our 2026 forecast for the
company. Its EBITDA plummeted by more than half in 2025 compared
with 2024, with EBITDA margin of 5.8% last year.

S&P said, "We now forecast EBITDA margin still below 10% in 2026
and debt to EBITDA close to 2.5x. But we see higher uncertainties
over the speed of the rebound for the auto industry and the
company's profitability this year.

"The company's EBITDA plunged by more than half in 2025 from the
2024 level because of a reduction in global demand for commercial
vehicles and in production amid geopolitical and global trade
uncertainties as well as high interest rates. Specifically, the
company's 2025 EBITDA shrank to R$563 million (5.8% margin) from
R$1.3 billion in 2024 (12% margin). We continue to forecast a
substantial rebound in the company's margins in 2026 due to the
expected increase in demand mainly related to fleet renewals, new
contracts already signed, and Tupy's cost-reduction measures. We
now project EBITDA margin to improve to approximately 9.5% in 2026,
reflecting operational efficiencies and higher volumes. However,
this remains below historical levels, as the starting point is
weaker than we previously anticipated. And we currently see greater
uncertainty surrounding the speed of the industry and company's
profitability recovery. The potential effects from the Middle East
War could depress demand in the transportation sector through
logistics bottlenecks, fuel costs, inflation, and interest rates.

"Weak profitability in the first half of 2026 will continue
pressuring leverage metrics. While we expect the global auto
industry to rebound in the second half of the year, we forecast
Tupy's debt to EBITDA to be about 2.5x in 2026, which, while an
improvement from 4.1x in 2025, will remain higher than the Tupy's
historical levels and what we would typically expect for a company
with a 'BB+' rating with similar scale and operations as Tupy. We
project relatively stable net debt at approximately R$2.3 billion
in 2026, with limited scope for significant reduction given the
projected cash flow. We also expect the company's EBIT interest
coverage to remain relatively low at 2.5x-3.0x in 2026,
highlighting the sensitivity of earnings to interest expense in a
scenario of a slowdown of the monetary easing. As a result, we
believe that Tupy's ability to absorb further adverse shocks is
limited, and its credit profile remains vulnerable to potential
downside risks. We anticipate that the company will need to improve
its profitability and cash flow consistently to achieve a more
comfortable leverage level."

Tupy managed to release working capital in the fourth quarter of
2025, maintaining an elevated cash position, but this could reverse
during 2026 to support higher volumes. As of the end of 2025, the
company held almost R$1.9 billion in cash and limited short-term
debt, providing a cushion against potential financial headwinds.
However, Tupy could face some working capital consumption during
2026 as it ramps up production amid the anticipated volume
recovery. S&P said, "We also forecast higher capital expenditure
(capex) of about R$550 million this year (versus R$439 million in
2025) to support production under new contracts and maintenance,
but operating cash flow will likely be sufficient to cover capex.
However, we will closely monitor the company's working capital
management practices to ensure that liquidity remains at acceptable
levels."

While not a primary driver of the rating action, disputes among
shareholders could pose some risks for the board's effective
oversight of the company's strategy and direction. Tupy's largest
shareholders are BNDESPar and Previ, with stakes of 30.7% and
27.0%, respectively. The largest minority shareholder, Charles
River (with a 5.4% stake), has been questioning the majority
shareholders over the appointments of Tupy's board of directors and
the current CEO. It proposed a change to Tupy's bylaws to include
'minimum eligibility requirements' for board members and directors,
which was rejected by the majority shareholders. These internal
disagreements could hinder the timely and decisive implementation
of key initiatives, impairing the company's ability to navigate a
challenging operating environment. A cohesive and effective board
is crucial for ensuring sound financial management, strategic
planning, and risk mitigation. Any prolonged or escalated
shareholder conflicts could undermine investor confidence and
potentially lead to suboptimal decision-making. S&P will continue
to monitor these disputes and assess their potential impact on
Tupy's creditworthiness.

S&P said, "The negative outlook reflects our view of uncertainties
over the rebound in demand for heavy-duty vehicles this year, which
could limit the expected improvements in the company's
profitability and leverage metrics.

"We could lower the ratings in the next 12 months if Tupy takes
longer than expected to achieve its cost-reduction targets or if
demand doesn't recover, eroding credit metrics. Under these
circumstances, we would expect the company's EBITDA margin to be
consistently below 10% and debt to EBITDA above 3x.

"We could revise the outlook to stable in the next 12 months if
Tupy's volumes and margins recover as a result of its operational
efficiency initiatives and a more favorable momentum for the
heavy-duty auto sector. In this scenario, we would see leverage
stabilized at 2x-3x with EBITDA margin about or above 10%."




===================================
D O M I N I C A N   R E P U B L I C
===================================

DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: Assesses Impact of Middle East Conflicts
------------------------------------------------------------
Dominican Today reports that the Dominican government reviewed its
preparedness to address the economic impact of Middle East
conflicts during a Council of Ministers meeting, emphasizing rising
volatility in global energy markets.  Authorities highlighted that
the country is equipped with strong macroeconomic fundamentals to
withstand external shocks, according to Dominican Today.

Finance Minister Magin Diaz stated that the Dominican Republic
maintains solid public finances, access to financing, and prudent
economic management, enabling it to protect stability, the report
notes.  The national budget includes approximately RD$12 billion
for fuel subsidies, with more than RD$10 billion available for
reallocation if necessary, the report relays.

Officials also pointed to key financial strengths, including nearly
US$16 billion in international reserves, high liquidity levels, and
public sector deposits exceeding RD$300 billion, the report notes.
Additionally, tax revenues are about RD$4 billion above
projections, reinforcing the government’s capacity to respond to
global uncertainties, the report discloses.

As part of its strategy, the government aims to protect vulnerable
households by strengthening social programs and closely monitoring
international prices of food, agricultural inputs, and fertilizers
to mitigate local impacts, the report says.  Private sector
representatives participating in the session also praised the
collaborative framework of Meta RD 2036 as an effective platform to
boost productivity and economic resilience, the report adds.

                 About Dominican Republic

The Dominican Republic is a Caribbean nation that shares the island
of Hispaniola with Haiti to the west. Capital city Santo Domingo
has Spanish landmarks like the Gothic Catedral Primada de America
dating back 5 centuries in its Zona Colonial district. Luis Rodolfo
Abinader Corona is the current president of the nation.

TCR-LA reported in April 2019 that Juan Del Rosario of the UASD
Economic Faculty cited a current economic slowdown for the
Dominican Republic and cautioned that if the trend continues,
growth would reach only 4% by 2023. Mr. Del Rosario said that if
that happens, "we'll face difficulties in meeting international
commitments."

An ongoing concern in the Dominican Republic is the inability of
participants in the electricity sector to establish financial
viability for the system.

Standard & Poor's credit rating for Dominican Republic was raised
to 'BB' in December 2022 with stable outlook.  Moody's credit
rating for Dominican Republic was last set at Ba3 in August 2023
with the outlook changed to positive.  Fitch, in December 2023,
affirmed the Dominican Republic's Long-Term Foreign-Currency Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) at 'BB-' and revised the outlook to positive.

DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: Raises Gasoline and Diesel Prices by RD$10
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dominican Today reports that the Dominican government's decision to
raise gasoline and diesel prices by RD$10 underscores the growing
impact of global instability on the local economy.  While
authorities point to the escalating conflict in the Middle East as
the driving force behind the adjustment, the move once again places
the burden of international shocks squarely on consumers, according
to Dominican Today.

According to the Ministry of Industry, Commerce and MSMEs, the
surge in oil prices -- fueled by what it describes as the most
significant supply disruption in history -- has pushed WTI crude up
by 70% so far in 2026, the report notes.  In that context,
officials argue that the increase is a matter of fiscal
responsibility rather than choice, the report relays.

Yet the numbers tell a more complex story, the report notes.  The
government has allocated RD$1.702 billion in subsidies alone in an
effort to cushion the blow of volatile global markets, the report
discloses.  At the same time, it has opted to freeze the price of
liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), a measure that offers some relief to
households but highlights the difficult balancing act between
protecting consumers and preserving public finances, the report
says.

For the week of March 21–27, 2026, fuel prices will be as
follows:

   -- Premium gasoline: RD$305.10 per gallon (increase)
   -- Regular gasoline: RD$287.50 per gallon (increase)
   -- Regular diesel: RD$239.80 per gallon (increase)
   -- Premium diesel: RD$257.10 per gallon (increase)
   -- Avtur: RD$323.49 per gallon (increase)
   -- Kerosene: RD$366.60 per gallon (increase)
   -- Fuel oil #6: RD$201.38 per gallon (increase)
   -- Fuel oil 1%S: RD$215.86 per gallon (increase)
   -- Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG): RD$137.20 per gallon
      (unchanged)
   -- Natural gas: RD$43.97 per cubic meter (unchanged)

                 About Dominican Republic

The Dominican Republic is a Caribbean nation that shares the island
of Hispaniola with Haiti to the west. Capital city Santo Domingo
has Spanish landmarks like the Gothic Catedral Primada de America
dating back 5 centuries in its Zona Colonial district. Luis Rodolfo
Abinader Corona is the current president of the nation.

TCR-LA reported in April 2019 that Juan Del Rosario of the UASD
Economic Faculty cited a current economic slowdown for the
Dominican Republic and cautioned that if the trend continues,
growth would reach only 4% by 2023. Mr. Del Rosario said that if
that happens, "we'll face difficulties in meeting international
commitments."

An ongoing concern in the Dominican Republic is the inability of
participants in the electricity sector to establish financial
viability for the system.

Standard & Poor's credit rating for Dominican Republic was raised
to 'BB' in December 2022 with stable outlook.  Moody's credit
rating for Dominican Republic was last set at Ba3 in August 2023
with the outlook changed to positive.  Fitch, in December 2023,
affirmed the Dominican Republic's Long-Term Foreign-Currency Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) at 'BB-' and revised the outlook to positive.




=====================
P U E R T O   R I C O
=====================

RB MARKETPLACE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: RB Marketplace Inc.
        Ave Chardon Esq Oliver
        Local 1 Plaza Chardon
        San Juan, PR 00918

        Business Description: RB Marketplace Inc. operates a
convenience store and marketplace offering grocery, deli,
beverage,
and household products in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The company also
owns the commercial property that houses the store along with
multiple other commercial spaces leased to tenants, including
food,
gaming, and advertising businesses. RB Marketplace Inc. operates
in
the retail convenience store and commercial real estate leasing
sectors.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 6, 2026

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Puerto Rico

Case No.: 26-00982

Debtor's Counsel: Noemi Landrau Rivera, Esq.
                  LANDRAU RIVERA & ASSOC.
                  PO Box 270219
                  San Juan, PR 00928
                  Tel: (787) 774-0224
                  Fax: (787) 793-1004
                  Email: nlandrau@landraulaw.com

Total Assets: $10,602,987

Total Liabilities: $5,482,265

The petition was signed by Claribel Baez De Jesus as president.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/KENFZ3A/RB_MARKETPLACE_INC__prbke-26-00982__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount

1. B2B Factoring                                          $142,934
Investments, LLC
Miramar Plaza
954 Ponce de Leon Ave,
Ste 601
San Juan, PR 00907

2. BMW Financial                                           $34,149
Services NA, LLC
AIS Portfolio Services, LLC
4515 N Santa Fe
Dept APS
Oklahoma City, OK 73118

3. BMW Financial                                            $7,958
Services NA, LLC
AIS Portfolio
Services, LLC
4515 N Santa Fe
Dept APS
Oklahoma City, OK 73118

4. Concesionarios PR                  Supplier             $17,674
Urb Santiago Iglesias
Ave Paz Granela
#1308-B
San Juan, PR 00921

5. Corp. Fondo del                    Workmen              $41,925
Seguro del Estado                   Compensation
PO Box 365028                        Insurance
San Juan, PR 00936

6. Criollos de Caguas                  Events              $81,678
Basketball LLC                      Coordinator
1608 Ave Ponce de Leon
Suite 400
San Juan, PR 00909

7. Departamento del Trabajo        Work Disability        $100,000
PO Box 191020                      & Unemployment
San Juan, PR                        Contribution
00919-1020

8. Department of Treasury              Income             $250,000
PO Box 9024140                      Withholding
San Juan, PR
00902-4140

9. Department of Treasury             Ivu Taxes           $250,000
PO Box 9024140
San Juan, PR
00902-4140

10. Internal Revenue Service          Taxes Owed           $79,580
PO Box 7346
Philadelphia, PA
19101-7346

11. Liberty Business               Utility Service         $16,909
PO Box 192296
San Juan, PR
00936-2296

12. Luma Energy                    Utility Service        $122,143
PO Box 363508
San Juan, PR
00936-3508

13. Luma Energy                    Utility Service         $96,148
PO Box 363508
San Juan, PR
00936-3508

14. Luma Energy                    Utility Service         $65,268
PO Box 363508
San Juan, PR
00936-3508

15. Mendez & Co., Inc.                Supplier             $61,151
PO Box 363348
San Juan, PR
00936-3348

16. Municipio de San Juan            Municipal             $70,436
PO Box 70179                          Ivu Tax
San Juan, PR
00936-8179

17. One Chardon Plaza Inc             Lawsuit              $30,000
Condominio Park Lane
65 Calle Santiago
Iglesias Apt 403
San Juan, PR 00907

18. Puerto Rico Supplies             Supplier              $28,050
PO Box 11908
San Juan, PR 00922

19. US Small Business Adm.          COVID Loan             $30,000
PO Box 3918
Portland, OR
97208-3918

20. V Suarez                         Supplier              $16,715
PO Box 364588
San Juan, PR
00936-4588


SN TRANSPORT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: SN Transport Inc.
        Lote 4, Km 0.4 Bo. Las Delicias
        Miradero Ward
        Cabo Rojo PR 00623

        Business Description: SN Transport, Inc., a privately held
company founded in June 2014 and based in Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico,
provides commercial transportation and goods delivery services
across the island. Incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico, the firm qualifies as a small business debtor
under
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 15, 2026

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Puerto Rico

Case No.: 26-01095

Debtor's Counsel: Jose Francisco Gierbolini, Esq.
                  420 Ponce de Leon Suite 607
                  San Juan PR 00918
                  Tel: 787-225-5367
                  E-mail: juriszone@capr.org

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Whesley Eliezer Sepulveda Rodriguez as
owner.

A copy of the Debtor's list of its 20 largest unsecured creditors
is available for free on PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/K6SV57A/SN_TRANSPORT_INC__prbke-26-01095__0010.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/XRDJNHQ/SN_TRANSPORT_INC__prbke-26-01095__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Latin America is a daily newsletter
co-published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless
Hills, Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C.,
USA, Marites O. Claro, Joy A. Agravante, Rousel Elaine T.
Fernandez, Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A.
Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2026.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2746.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Latin America subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members
of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription or
balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000.
.


                  * * * End of Transmission * * *