T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

             Tuesday, January 24, 2006, Vol. 10, No. 20

                             Headlines

AAIPHARMA INC: Court Confirms Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization
AES CORP.: Names Victoria Harker as Chief Financial Officer
ALLIED HOLDINGS: Lexington Wants a Decision on Georgia Lease
ALLIED HOLDINGS: Court OKs Amended Key Employee Retention Program
ALLIED HOLDINGS: Court Approves GM Delivery Contract

ALLSERVE SYSTEMS: Court Converts Case to Chapter 7 Liquidation
AMERICAN MOULDING: Wants Court to Okay Stancil & Co. as Accountant
AMERICAN MOUDLING: Wants to Reject 12 Equipment Leases
AOL LATIN AMERICA: Non-Debtor Subsidiaries to be Liquidated
ATLANTIC GULF: Ch. 7 Trustee Gets Okay to Sell Assets for $430K

BEKENTON USA: Court Okays Insurance Premium Financing from AICCO
BABCOCK & WILCOX: McDermott Shareholders Vote Resolution to Deal
BOYDS COLLECTION: Court Fixes February 14 as Claims Bar Date
BUFFETS HOLDINGS: Moody's Affirms Caa1 Sr. Unsecured Notes' Rating
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES: S&P Affirms Corporate Credit Rating at B+

CAREMORE HOLDINGS: Moody's Rates Proposed $150 Mil. Facility at B2
CAREMORE HOLDINGS: S&P Rates Proposed $150 Million Facilities at B
CENTRAL GARDEN: Farnam Purchase Prompts Moody's to Review Ratings
CENTRAL GARDEN: Farnam Purchase Prompts S&P's Negative Watch
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY: Buys Oil & Natural Gas Properties for $796 Mil.

DATICON INC: Files Amended List of 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
DATICON INC: Wants to Hire Neubert Pepe as Bankruptcy Counsel
DELTA AIRLINES: Has Until July 11 to File Chapter 11 Plan
DELTA AIR: Committee Wants Aviation Specialists as Consultant
DELTA AIR: Enters Section 1110(b) Stipulation for 14 Aircraft

DMX MUSIC: Has Until February 9 to Remove Civil Actions
DONALD GATZKE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
DPAC TECH: Nov. 30 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $920,000
DRS TECHS: Fitch Assigns Low-B Ratings to $1.7 Billion Debts
ECHOSTAR DBS: S&P Rates $1.5 Billion 7.125% Senior Notes at BB-

ELWOOD ENERGY: S&P Affirms $402 Million Sr. Sec. Bonds' B+ Rating
EURAMAX INT'L: Moody's Affirms $190 Mil. Term Loan's Junk Rating
FLOWERS FOODS: Good Performance Cues Moody's to Review Ba2 Rating
FREEDOM 2000-1: Moody's Puts Class F Notes' B2 Rating on Watch
GENERAL MARITIME: Completes Tender Offer for 10% Senior Notes

GLIMCHER REALTY: Completes $58.3-Mil. Purchase of Tulsa Promenade
HAPPY KIDS: Sells Assets to Wear Me for $23 Million
HARTCOURT COMPANIES: Earns $104,690 of Net Income in 2nd Quarter
ICEWEB INC: Sherb & Co. Raises Going Concern Doubt
IGIA INC: Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $17 Million at November 30

IMPERIAL HOME: Wants Court to Okay 14 Avoidance Action Settlements
INVESCO CBO: Moody's Puts Class B-2 Notes' Ba3 Rating on Watch
J.L. FRENCH: S&P Withdraws CCC+ Corporate Credit Rating
L.J. MAKRANCY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
MCDERMOTT INT'L: 98.6% of Shareholders Okay Babcock Settlement

METROMEDIA FIBER: Wants Another Delay in Entry of Final Decree
MORGAN STANLEY: S&P Rates $40 Million Class V Secured Notes at BB
MUSICLAND HOLDING: Wants to Conduct Store Closing Sales
MUSICLAND HOLDING: Can Continue Using Cash Management System
NOBEX CORP: Panel Taps NachmanHaysBrownstein as Financial Advisor

NORTHWESTERN CORP: Responds to Inquiries from Harbert Distressed
O'SULLIVAN IND: Panel Challenges Bank of NY's Security Interests
O'SULLIVAN INDUSTRIES: Panel Wants Retention Objections Overruled
OMEGA HEALTHCARE: Moody's Raises Sr. Unsecured Debt Rating to Ba3
OMNOVA SOLUTIONS: Earns $4.1 Million in Fourth Quarter of 2005

REFCO INC: Judge Drain Delays Auction of Forex Unit's Assets
RESORTS INT'L: Poor Performance Cues S&P to Junk Credit Rating
RUFUS INC: All Ballots Must be Submitted by January 25
SAINT VINCENTS: Hui Ji Yan Can Proceed With State Court Action
SANITARY & IMPROVEMENT: U.S. Trustee Amends Committee Membership

SAXON ASSET: Moody's Junks Ratings on Two Certificate Classes
SCHLOTZSKY'S INC: Wooleys Want Ch. 11 Cases Converted to Chapter 7
SIRICOMM INC: BKD LLP Raises Going Concern Doubt
SPORTS CLUB: Completes $80 Million Asset Sale to Millennium Ent.
STRESSGEN BIOTECH: Receives Final Proceeds from Sale of Bioreagent

SUNCOM WIRELESS: Moody's Reviews Junk Ratings & May Downgrade
TECHALT INC: Restates Results for Year Ended December 31, 2004
THOMAS EQUIPMENT: Restates Fiscal Year 2005 Financial Results
TIDEL TECHNOLOGIES: Hein & Associates Raises Going Concern Doubt
TRANSTECHNOLOGY CORP: Dec. 25 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $5 Mil.

TRM CORP: S&P Holds B+ Corporate Credit & Debt Ratings on Watch
TRUMP ENT: Scott Butera Resigns as EVP & Chief Strategic Officer
TRUMP HOTELS: Court Lifts Stay to Let Koch & Faicco Pursue Claims
TRUMP HOTELS: Court Lifts Stay to Let Vuong Pursue $606,492 Claim
UAL CORP: Judge Wedoff Confirms Amended Reorganization Plan

VENTURE HOLDINGS: Section 341 Meeting Slated for February 16
VILLAS AT HACIENDA: Court Confirms WPD's Reorganization Plan
WHITE BIRCH: S&P Lowers Second-Lien Term Loan's Rating to CCC+
WHITEHALL JEWELLERS: Newcastle Able to Close $1.50 Per Share Offer
WHITEHALL JEWELLERS: Lenders Impose Limitations on Borrowings

XERIUM TECHS: Moody's Affirms B1 Ratings With Negative Outlook

* Large Companies with Insolvent Balance Sheets

                             *********

AAIPHARMA INC: Court Confirms Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization
---------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware confirmed
the First Amended Plan of Reorganization of aaiPharma Inc.  The
Company expects that the Plan, which received the overwhelming
support of the Company's creditors that voted on the Plan, will
become effective by early February 2006.

Under the terms of the reorganization plan, approximately 100% of
the equity of the Company will be distributed to its current
bondholders, including amongst others JPMorgan Securities, Inc.,
which will result in the Company being a private Company.  Holders
of unsecured claims will be entitled to receive their pro rata
share of a cash distribution from a $4 million pool.  Current
holders of the Company's common stock will receive no distribution
and all shares of AAIPharma's existing common stock will be
cancelled.

The Company has also obtained commitments to refinance the
Company's existing DIP financing and to provide for the Company's
working capital needs.  The effectiveness of the Plan is subject
to the satisfaction of a number of conditions, including the
consummation of the financing.  Although no assurances can be
given that the conditions to obtaining the financing will be
satisfied, the Company believes that the financing will be
consummated by early February 2006.

"We are very pleased that the Court has confirmed our plan of
reorganization," Dr. Ludo J. Reynders, President & CEO of
AAIPharma, stated.  "Upon consummation of the plan, AAIPharma will
emerge as a healthy company with restored financial strength to
meet the needs of our customers and to provide a stable work
environment for our employees.  We look forward to the many new
opportunities available to the Company following completion of our
reorganization."

Headquartered in Wilmington, North Carolina, aaiPharma Inc. --
http://aaipharma.com/-- provides product development services to   
the pharmaceutical industry and sells pharmaceutical products that
primarily target pain management.  AAI operates two divisions:
AAI Development Services and Pharmaceuticals Division.

The Company and eight of its debtor-affiliates filed for chapter
11 protection on May 10, 2005 (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 05-11341).
Karen McKinley, Esq., and Mark D. Collins, Esq., at Richards,
Layton & Finger, P.A.; Jenn Hanson, Esq., and Gary L. Kaplan,
Esq., at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP; and the
firm of Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A., represent the Debtors
in their restructuring efforts.  When the Debtors filed for
bankruptcy, they reported consolidated assets amounting to
$323,323,000 and consolidated debts totaling $446,693,000.


AES CORP.: Names Victoria Harker as Chief Financial Officer
-----------------------------------------------------------
The AES Corporation reported that effective Jan. 23, 2006,
Victoria Harker will become its Chief Financial Officer and an
Executive Vice President.

Ms. Harker joins AES from MCI where she served as Senior Vice
President and Treasurer.  Ms. Harker served as Chief Financial
Officer of the $15 billion MCI Group, a publicly traded unit of
WorldCom Inc., from 1998 to 2000, and oversaw a variety of
finance, information technology and operations responsibilities
during her fifteen-year tenure at MCI.

"Victoria brings a solid set of financial management skills that
will enable her to lead our finance organization as we continue to
focus on improving our businesses and begin to build our
development pipeline," said Paul Hanrahan, AES President and Chief
Executive Officer.  "Victoria's impressive and diverse experience
will make her a valued member of our leadership team."

AES Corporation -- http://www.aes.com/-- is a leading global  
power company, with 2004 revenues of $9.5 billion.  AES operates
in 27 countries, generating 44,000 megawatts of electricity
through 124 power facilities and delivers electricity through 15
distribution companies.  AES Corp.'s 30,000 people are committed
to operational excellence and meeting the world's growing power
needs.

                        *    *    *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 11, 2006,
Moody's affirmed the ratings of The AES Corporation, including its
Ba3 Corporate Family Rating and the B1 rating on its senior
unsecured debt.  The rating outlook remains stable.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on June 23, 2005,
Fitch Ratings has upgraded and removed the ratings of AES
Corporation from Rating Watch Positive, where it was initially
placed on Jan. 18, 2005, pending review of the company's year-end
financial results.  Fitch said the Rating Outlook is Stable.


ALLIED HOLDINGS: Lexington Wants a Decision on Georgia Lease
------------------------------------------------------------
LEPERQ Corporate Income Fund L.P. is the lessor of the Debtors'
headquarters facility located in Decatur, Georgia.  Lexington
leases the Facility to Allied Holdings, Inc., and its debtor-
affiliates for a 10-year term, expiring in December 2007.  The
Debtors pay over $135,000 monthly rent for the Facility, which is
valued at over $14,600,000.

While the Debtors has continued to pay required monthly rent,
they are in breach of their duty to replace the roof of the
building, Daniel P. Sinaiko, Esq., at Morris, Manning & Martin,
L.L.P., in Atlanta, Georgia, tells Judge Drake of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

As a result of the deteriorating condition of the roof and
Lexington's inability to lease vacant portions of the premises,
Lexington's interest in its property is not adequately protected
and Lexington is forced to bear the economic risks of further
delay, Mr. Sinaiko contends.  "The Debtors' right to use and
occupy the Georgia Premises is conditioned on the replacement of
the roof of the Facility."

A delay in the decision to assume or reject the Lease could allow
the Debtors to use the Georgia Premises and not pay for the Roof
if they decide to reject the Lease, Mr. Sinaiko points out.

Mr. Sinaiko emphasizes that as long as the Lease remains in limbo
and the Debtors retain the right to pass on potential new
tenants, Lexington cannot protect itself against the potential
injury it will suffer in the event of a rejection.

Accordingly, Lexington asks the Court to:

   (a) compel the Debtors to assume or reject the Georgia Lease
       on or before February 28, 2006;

   (b) compel the Debtors to perform their leasehold obligation
       to replace the roof of the Facility;

   (c) modify the automatic stay to allow it to exercise all
       rights which it may have under applicable state law to
       terminate the Lease; and

   (d) grant it adequate protection for its interest in the
       Premises in the event the Court declines to modify the
       automatic stay.

The nature of the interests at stake, the balance of hurt to the
litigants, the good to be achieved and the safeguards afforded to
the litigants all weigh in favor of fixing of a prompt deadline
for assumption or rejection, Mr. Sinaiko argues.

Mr. Sinaiko avers that the Debtors failed to perform its
obligation to repair the Roof within 60 days of the Petition
Date.  "The Debtors should not be permitted to continue in
possession of the Georgia Premises while failing to perform its
obligations under the Lease."

Headquartered in Decatur, Georgia, Allied Holdings, Inc. --  
http://www.alliedholdings.com/-- and its affiliates provide    
short-haul services for original equipment manufacturers and
provide logistical services.  The Company and 22 of its affiliates
filed for chapter 11 protection on July 31, 2005 (Bankr. N.D. Ga.  
Case Nos. 05-12515 through 05-12537).  Jeffrey W. Kelley, Esq., at  
Troutman Sanders, LLP, represents the Debtors in their  
restructuring efforts.  When the Debtors filed for protection from  
their creditors, they estimated more than $100 million in assets  
and debts. (Allied Holdings Bankruptcy News, Issue No.  15;
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., 215/945-7000)


ALLIED HOLDINGS: Court OKs Amended Key Employee Retention Program
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. W. Homer Drake of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Georgia approved Allied Holdings, Inc., and
its debtor-affiliates' Key Employee Retention Program in its
entirety.

The Debtors amended their KERP to incorporate conditions set by
the Bankruptcy Court.  Pursuant to the Amended KERP, the Debtors,
the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and the U.S. Trustee
have conferred and agreed on the percentages of the installment
payments of retention bonuses to the Tier 1b ad Tier 2 Employees.

A full-text copy of the Amended KERP is available at no charge at

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/allied_AmendedKERP.pdf

A full-text copy of the corrected version of the KERP Order is
available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/alliedCorrectedKERPOrder.pdf

Headquartered in Decatur, Georgia, Allied Holdings, Inc. --  
http://www.alliedholdings.com/-- and its affiliates provide    
short-haul services for original equipment manufacturers and
provide logistical services.  The Company and 22 of its affiliates
filed for chapter 11 protection on July 31, 2005 (Bankr. N.D. Ga.  
Case Nos. 05-12515 through 05-12537).  Jeffrey W. Kelley, Esq., at  
Troutman Sanders, LLP, represents the Debtors in their  
restructuring efforts.  When the Debtors filed for protection from  
their creditors, they estimated more than $100 million in assets  
and debts. (Allied Holdings Bankruptcy News, Issue No.  15;
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., 215/945-7000)


ALLIED HOLDINGS: Court Approves GM Delivery Contract
----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia
approved the vehicle delivery agreement between Allied Holdings,
Inc.'s subsidiary, Allied Automotive Group, Inc., and General
Motors Corporation.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Dec. 14, 2005, the
agreement with General Motors will extend Allied Automotive's
current contract through Dec. 31, 2008.  Pursuant to the terms of
the renewed agreement, Allied Automotive has retained all of the
vehicle delivery business it currently services for General Motors
in North America.

The contract renewal includes increases in the rates paid by
General Motors to Allied Automotive for vehicle delivery services
during calendar years 2006 and in 2007.  In addition, the current
fuel surcharge program and payment terms for services provided by
Allied Automotive will remain in place during the term of the
renewed agreement.

Headquartered in Decatur, Georgia, Allied Holdings, Inc. --  
http://www.alliedholdings.com/-- and its affiliates provide    
short-haul services for original equipment manufacturers and
provide logistical services.  The Company and 22 of its affiliates
filed for chapter 11 protection on July 31, 2005 (Bankr. N.D. Ga.  
Case Nos. 05-12515 through 05-12537).  Jeffrey W. Kelley, Esq., at  
Troutman Sanders, LLP, represents the Debtors in their  
restructuring efforts.  When the Debtors filed for protection from  
their creditors, they estimated more than $100 million in assets  
and debts. (Allied Holdings Bankruptcy News, Issue No.  15;
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., 215/945-7000)


ALLSERVE SYSTEMS: Court Converts Case to Chapter 7 Liquidation
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable Rosemary Gambardella of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of New Jersey converted the chapter 11 case of
Allserve Systems Corp. into a chapter 7 liquidation proceeding.

Bunce Atkinson, Esq., the Debtor's chapter 11 Trustee, asserted
that the chapter 11 case should be converted due to:

   * the Company's inability to operate at a profit;

   * fraudulent transfers and preferences;

   * diversion of funds and assets to the Debtor's subsidiary in
     India; and

   * the Company's inability to reorganize.

Mr. Atkinson says that he decided to close the business and secure
the premises because it was not feasible to continue to operate
the business and because he feared that physical assets and
financial records would be destroyed or removed.

Mr. Atkinson adds that the Debtor is administratively insolvent.

                     Chapter 7 Trustee

Kelly Beaudin Stapleton, the U.S. Trustee for Region 3 named
Charles A. Stanziale, Jr., Esq., at McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney &
Carpenter, as chapter 7 Trustee for Allserve Systems Corp.

Headquartered in North Brunswick, New Jersey, Allserve Systems
Corp. is an outsourcing company for the IT industry.  The Debtor
filed for chapter 11 protection on November 18, 2005 (Bankr. D.
N.J. Case No. 05-60401).  Barry W. Frost, Esq., at Teich Groh
represents the Debtor in its restructuring efforts.  When the
Debtor filed for protection from its creditors, it estimated
assets between 10 million to $50 million and debts between $50
million to $100 million.


AMERICAN MOULDING: Wants Court to Okay Stancil & Co. as Accountant
------------------------------------------------------------------
American Moulding and Millwork Company asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of California for permission to
employ Stancil & Company as its accountants.

Stancil & Company will:

    (a) analyze the impact of the sale of the real property
        located in Stockton, California and

    (b) prepare and file the Debtor's 2005 tax returns.

Kenneth P. Martin, a partner at Stancil & Co., tells the Court
that he bills $175 per hour for his services.  Mr. Martin
discloses that the Firm's other professionals bill:

         Designation              Hourly Rate
         -----------              -----------
         Partner                     $175
         Manager                     $110
         Staff                        $75

Mr. Martin assures the Court that the Firm is a "disinterested
person" as that term is defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The Firm can be reached at:

         Stancil & Company,
         4909 Windy Hill Drive
         Raleigh, North Carolina 27609

Headquartered in Sanford, North Carolina, American Moulding and
Millwork Company -- http://www.amfurniture.com/-- is a supplier
of real wood furniture and cabinetry.  The Company filed for
chapter 11 protection on Oct. 6, 2005 (Bankr. E.D. Calif. Case No.
05-34431).  Thomas A. Willoughby, Esq., at Felderstein Fitzgerald
Willoughby & Pascuzzi LLP represents the Debtor in its
restructuring efforts.  When the Debtor filed for protection from
its creditors, it listed $17,663,776 in assets and $18,481,093 in
debts.


AMERICAN MOULDING: Wants to Reject 12 Equipment Leases
------------------------------------------------------
American Moulding and Millwork Company asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of California for authority to
reject a dozen forklift leases.  

The Debtor tells the Court that it no longer needs the forklifts
subject to the equipment leases.  The Debtor wants to reject these
leases:

                                Make/Model/
Lessor          Lease No.       Serial No.        Location
------          ---------       -----------       --------
G.E. Capital/   90132299828     Daewoo            Sanford, NC
Mellon                          GC20E CV-01422

G.E. Capital    90132734958     Daewoo            Sanford, NC
                                G30E CX-03490

G.E. Capital    90132299827     Daewoo            Goldston, NC
                                GC20E CV-01424

G.E. Capital/   90132299828     Daewoo            Goldston, NC
Mellon                          GC20E CV-01431

G.E. Capital    90132353922     Daewoo            Goldston, NC
                                GC20E CV-01530

G.E. Capital    90132663804     Daewoo            Goldston, NC
                                GC20E CV-01529

G.E. Capital    90132755341     Daewoo            Goldston, NC
                                GC20E CV-01104

G.E. Capital    90132755374     Daewoo            Goldston, NC
                                GC20E CV-01429

G.E. Capital    90133577294     Daewoo            Goldston, NC
                                GC20E FQ-00461

G.E. Capital    90133577290     Daewoo            Goldston, NC
                                GC20E FQ-00459

G.E. Capital    90133577328     Daewoo            Goldston, NC
                                GC20E FQ-00458

G.E. Capital                    Clarklift         Goldston, NC
                                WP45 WP45-0238-
                                8206

Headquartered in Sanford, North Carolina, American Moulding and
Millwork Company -- http://www.amfurniture.com/-- is a supplier
of real wood furniture and cabinetry.  The Company filed for
chapter 11 protection on Oct. 6, 2005 (Bankr. E.D. Calif. Case No.
05-34431).  Thomas A. Willoughby, Esq., at Felderstein Fitzgerald
Willoughby & Pascuzzi LLP represents the Debtor in its
restructuring efforts.  When the Debtor filed for protection from
its creditors, it listed $17,663,776 in assets and $18,481,093 in
debts.


AOL LATIN AMERICA: Non-Debtor Subsidiaries to be Liquidated
-----------------------------------------------------------
America Online Latin America, Inc., entered into a letter
agreement with AOL S. de R.L. de C.V. aka AOL Mexico, AOL Brazil
Ltda., America Online, Inc., Time Warner, Inc., Aspen Investments
LLC and Atlantis Investments LLC on Jan. 17, 2006.

The letter agreement was entered into in connection with the joint
filing by AOLA and its wholly owned subsidiaries, AOL Puerto Rico
Management Services, Inc., America Online Caribbean Basin, Inc.,
and AOL Latin America Management LLC, of a proposed joint plan of
reorganization and liquidation and related disclosure statement in
their jointly administered chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.  The
letter agreement provides for the payment of certain wind-down
costs by AOL Mexico and AOL Brazil to America Online.  The letter
agreement stated:

The purpose of this letter agreement is to confirm AOL's
understandings and agreements relating to the payment of certain
post-petition costs and expenses associated with the wind-down of
America Online Latin America, Inc., and its subsidiaries.

As previously reported in the Troubled Company Reporter, AOLA and
certain of its subsidiaries are debtors in a jointly administered
chapter 11 case pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware.  On or about January 17, 2006, the
debtors intend to file a joint plan of reorganization and
liquidation, which will provide for the implementation of the
wind-down.  Pursuant to the wind-down, certain of AOLA's non-
debtor subsidiaries, including AOL S. de R.L. de C.V. and AOL
Brasil Ltda. will be liquidated and/or dissolved in accordance
with applicable local laws.  America Online, Inc. is expected to
incur actual out-of-pocket costs and expenses in assisting AOLA,
AOL Mexico and AOL Brazil in their efforts to terminate service,
discontinue customers, and shut down operations in connection with
the wind-down of AOL Mexico and AOL Brazil, as set forth in an
estimate delivered by AOL to AOLA.  The parties have agreed that
AOL will be reimbursed for the wind-down costs in a manner
consistent with the following terms and conditions.  Specifically:

    - All payments made by AOL Mexico or AOL Brazil to AOL
      will be made free and clear of, and without deduction or
      withholding for or on account of, any taxes, levies,
      imposts, duties, charges, fees, deductions or withholdings,
      except Taxes AOL is required to pay;

    - AOL Mexico and AOL Brazil shall indemnify AOL, within 10
      days after written demand, for the full amount of any Non-
      Excluded Taxes paid by or with respect to AOL on or
      with respect to any payment by or on account of any
      obligation of AOL, and AOL promises to cooperate
      with AOL Mexico and AOL Brazil to contest any non-excluded
      taxes;

    - If AOL receives a refund on any tax paid by AOL Mexico or
      AOL Brazil, AOL will rebate that amount to AOLA;

    - AOL Mexico agrees, and AOLA agrees to cause AOL Mexico, to
      reimburse AOL in an amount up to $300,000 for wind-down
      costs incurred by AOL in connection with the shut-down of
      AOL Mexico.  AOL will be reimbursed for any AOL Mexico Wind-
      Down Costs -- up to the $300,000 cap -- as and when services
      resulting in AOL Mexico Wind-Down Costs are performed and
      billed to AOL Mexico.  AOL and AOLA agree to cooperate to
      produce a separate agreement between AOL and AOL Mexico and
      all other documentation reasonably required to ensure
      optimal externalization of funds in respect of the payment
      of the AOL Mexico wind-down costs.  AOL agrees to take
      reasonable commercial efforts to minimize the amount of the
      AOL Mexico wind-down costs and only to charge AOL Mexico for
      actual out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred in
      connection with the shutdown of AOL Mexico; and

    - AOL Brazil agrees, and AOLA agrees to cause AOL Brazil, to
      reimburse AOL in an amount up to $1,004,000 for wind-down
      costs incurred by AOL in connection with the shutdown of AOL
      Brazil. AOL will be reimbursed for any AOL Brazil wind-down
      costs -- up to the $1,004,000 cap -- as and when services
      resulting in AOL Brazil Wind-Down Costs are performed and
      billed to AOL Brazil.  AOL and AOLA agree to cooperate to
      produce a separate agreement between AOL and AOL Brazil and
      all other documentation reasonably required to ensure
      optimal externalization of funds in respect of the payment
      of the AOL Brazil wind-down costs.  AOL agrees to take
      reasonable commercial efforts to minimize the amount of the
      AOL Brazil wind-down costs and to only charge AOL Brazil for
      actual out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred in
      connection with the shut-down of AOL Brazil and, to the
      extent AOL's actual out-of-pocket costs and expenses depend
      upon negotiations with third parties, to take reasonable
      commercial efforts to minimize the amount of such costs.
      
America Online offers AOL-branded Internet service in Argentina,
Brazil, Mexico and Puerto Rico, as well as localized content and
online shopping over its proprietary network.  Its subscribers
also get access to popular AOL services like instant messaging,
online chat, e-mail, and personalized homepages.  In addition, it
maintains localized Internet portals serving users in about 20
countries.  In total, it has more than 460 thousand members.
Principal shareholders in it are Cisneros Group, one of Latin
America's media firms, Brazil's Banco Itau, and Time Warner,
through America Online.

Headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, America Online Latin
America, Inc. -- http://www.aola.com/-- offers AOL-branded
Internet service in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and Puerto Rico,
as well as localized content and online shopping over its
proprietary network.  Principal shareholders in AOLA are
Cisneros Group, one of Latin America's largest media firms,
Brazil's Banco Itau, and Time Warner, through America Online.
The Company and its debtor-affiliates filed for Chapter 11
protection on June 24, 2005 (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 05-11778).
Pauline K. Morgan, Esq., and Edmon L. Morton, Esq., at Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP and Douglas P. Bartner, Esq., at
Shearman & Sterling LLP represent the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts.  When the Debtors filed for protection
from their creditors, they listed total assets of $28,500,000
and total debts of $181,774,000.


ATLANTIC GULF: Ch. 7 Trustee Gets Okay to Sell Assets for $430K
---------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware approved
Michael B. Joseph's request to sell Atlantic Gulf Communities
Corporation and its debtor-affiliates' 14 tracts of real estate
property free and clear of all liens, claims, interests and
encumbrances to HT Land Trust, LLC.  The Court approved the sale
transaction on Jan. 6, 2006.

Mr. Joseph is the chapter 7 Trustee overseeing the liquidation of
the Debtors' estates.

Mr. Joseph and HT Land entered into a Contract for Sale on Dec. 6,
2005, calling for the sale of 14 tracts of real property in
various locations in Florida to HT Land for $430,000.  In an
auction conducted on Jan. 4, 2006, HT Land submitted the highest
and best bid for those assets.

The Court orders that any statutory lien for 2006 real estate
taxes assessed by Brevard County, Florida will remain attached to
the 14 tracts of real estate until paid in full, and will not
attach to the proceeds of the sale.  HT Land will pay all 2006
real estate taxes on the property subject to the proration
provisions of the Contract of Sale between Mr. Joseph and HT Land.

A full-text copy of the Contract of Sale is available for free at
http://ResearchArchives.com/t/s?481

Headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Atlantic Gulf
Communities Corporation was a developer and operator of luxury
residential real estate communities.  The Company and its
affiliates filed for chapter 11 protection on May 1, 2001 (Bankr.
D. Del. Case Nos. 01-01594 through 01-01597).  Michael R.
Lastowski, Esq., at Duane Morris LLP represents the Debtor.  The
Bankruptcy Court converted the Debtors' chapter 11 cases to a
chapter 7 liquidation proceeding on June 18, 2002.  Michael B.
Joseph is the chapter 7 Truste for the Debtors' estates.  John D.
McLaughlin, Jr., Esq., at Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP
represents the chapter 11 Trustee.  When the Debtors filed for
chapter 11 protection, they listed $148,546,000 in assets and
$170,251,000 in liabilities.


BEKENTON USA: Court Okays Insurance Premium Financing from AICCO
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida
approved the post-petition premium finance agreement between
Bekenton USA, Inc., and AICCO Inc.

The Debtor tells the Court that general liability insurance
coverage is necessary for the continued and uninterrupted
operations of the Debtor's business and to avoid any loss to the
estate resulting from potential damage to the Debtor's property.

            Insurance Coverage & Proposed Financing

The Debtor says that prior to its bankruptcy filing, it carried
and maintained general liability insurance with an annual premium
of $28,875.  In accordance with the proposed premium finance
contract, the Debtor will make an initial $8,250 installment and
pay off the $20,625 balance in nine equal monthly installments of
$2,371 -- including $715 in finance charges.  The loan accrues
interest at 8.25% per annum.

The Debtor tells the Court that it has obtained a new standard ISO
general Liability Policy through Admiral Insurance.  The Debtor
discloses that AICCO has agreed to finance the Admiral Insurance
Policy pursuant to the premium finance agreement.  AICCO's credit
extended to the Debtor shall be secured by an assignment of all
right, title and interest to the policies of insurance together
with any unearned premium, to be issued by Admiral for the General
Liability Insurance.

The Debtor discloses that if any premium due to AICCO remains
unpaid 10 days after a written notice of default was given to the
Debtor, AICCO and Admiral will be entitled to seek the immediate
cancellation of the policies in force providing for the insurance
coverage.

A copy of the three-page Premium Finance Agreement is available
for free at http://ResearchArchives.com/t/s?488

Headquartered in Miami Beach, Florida, Bekenton USA, Inc.,
manufactures tobacco products.  The Debtor filed for chapter 11
protection on Nov. 4, 2005 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 05-60031).  
Mariaelena Gayo-Guitian, Esq., at Adorno & Yoss, P.A., represents
the Debtor in its restructuring efforts.  When the Debtor filed
for protection from its creditors, it listed assets totaling
$5,227,073 and debts totaling $15,750,548.


BABCOCK & WILCOX: McDermott Shareholders to Vote to Accept Deal
---------------------------------------------------------------
A special meeting of McDermott International, Inc.'s shareholders
was held in Houston, Texas for the purpose of voting on a
resolution approving the proposed settlement of the Chapter 11
proceeding involving The Babcock & Wilcox Company and certain of
its affiliates.  Of the 56,278,076 votes cast, approximately 98.6%
voted in favor of the resolution.  The votes in favor of the
resolution constitute a majority of all shares of common stock
outstanding and entitled to vote as of the record date.

"I appreciate our shareholders voting in such strong support of
this resolution, particularly outside the normal proxy season,"
Bruce W. Wilkinson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
McDermott, said.  "Combined with the confirmation order from the
United States District Court, McDermott and B&W continue to get
ever closer to officially reuniting.  On the effective date of
B&W's plan of reorganization, McDermott will again be a leading
worldwide energy services company with a strong presence in power
generation, marine construction and government operations.  The
vote supports our expectation that the plan will be effective by
Feb. 22, 2006."

Once approved, the settlement will settle as many as 300,000
asbestos injury claims ranging $375 million to $955 million
in costs for the Company, depending on whether Congress creates
a national trust to handle all such cases.

Remaining items required for the settlement to become effective
include obtaining exit financing for B&W and the completion of
certain other conditions by Feb. 22, 2006, the effective date
deadline.  McDermott expects B&W's exit financing package will be
signed on the effective date.

Headquartered in New Orleans, Louisiana, McDermott International,
Inc. -- http://www.mcdermott.com/-- is a leading worldwide energy  
services company.  The Company's subsidiaries provide engineering,
fabrication, installation, procurement, research, manufacturing,
environmental systems, project management and facility management
services to a variety of customers in the energy and power
industries, including the U.S. Department of Energy.

Babcock & Wilcox Company, together with its debtor-affiliates,
filed for Chapter 11 protection on February 22, 2000, (Bankr. E.D.
La. Case No. 00-10992).  Jan Marie Hayden, Esq., at Heller,
Draper, Hayden, Patrick & Horn, L.L.C., represents the debtors in
their restructuring efforts.

Since February 2000, B&W has continued to be managed by McDermott;
however its results of operations have been deconsolidated from
McDermott's financial statements.  The Company wrote off its
remaining investment in B&W of $224.7 million during the second
quarter of 2002.

For the year ended Dec. 31, 2004, on a deconsolidated basis,
B&W generated operating income of $115.6 million on revenues of
$1.37 billion.  B&W's net income for the year-ended Dec. 31,
2004, was $99.1 million, including the result of favorable tax
valuation allowance adjustment of $26.2 million.  Beginning in
2005, McDermott spun off the pension plan assets and liabilities
associated with B&W's portion of McDermott Incorporated's pension
plan, creating a B&W-sponsored pension plan.  As a result of the
creation of a B&W-sponsored pension plan, beginning in 2005
expenses associated with this plan are accounted for on B&W's
financials.  In 2004, McDermott recorded approximately $38 million
in pension expense associated with B&W pension on McDermott's
income statement.  At Aug. 24, 2005, B&W had unrestricted cash &
cash equivalents of $352 million.

                          *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Dec. 14, 2005,
McDermott International, Inc., and certain of its subsidiaries
received either increased or new credit ratings from the major
rating agencies.  Each rating agency indicated its outlook for
McDermott and its subsidiaries are stable.

This table reflects the current respective ratings from each
agency:

                          Standard & Poor's       Moody's
                          Ratings Services   Investors Service
                          -----------------  -----------------
                          Previous  Current  Previous  Current
                                        (1)
                          --------  -------  --------  -------
McDermott Int'l, Inc.        B-        B+       -        B2   (2)
McDermott Incorporated       B-        B+       B3       -    (3)
J. Ray McDermott, S.A.      CCC+       B+      Caa1      B2   (4)
Babcock & Wilcox Co(5)                 B+       -        B1   (4)

     (1) S&P's corporate credit rating
     (2) Moody's corporate family rating
     (3) Moody's withdrew its rating on McDermott Inc. following
         the December 2005 MTN redemption.
     (4) Moody's senior secured rating
     (5) The Babcock & Wilcox Company ratings are newly assigned.


BOYDS COLLECTION: Court Fixes February 14 as Claims Bar Date
------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable Duncan W. Keir of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland set February 14, 2006, at 5:00 p.m., as the
deadline for all creditors owed money on account of claims arising
prior to October 16, 2005, against The Boyds Collection, Ltd., and
its debtor-affiliates to file proofs of claim.

Creditors must file written proofs of claim on or before the
February 14 Claims Bar Date and those forms must be sent either:

  (a) by mail to:

      The Garden City Group, Inc.
      Attn: BBC Claims Processing
      P.O. Box 9000 #6361
      Merrick, New York 11566-9000

        - or -

  (b) by messenger or overnight courier to:

      The Garden City Group, Inc.
      Attn: BBC Claims Processing
      105 Maxess Road
      Melville, New York 11747

Governmental units must file proofs of claim on or before
April 14, 2006, at 5:00 p.m.

Headquartered in McSherrystown, Pennsylvania, The Boyds
Collection, Ltd. -- http://www.boydsstuff.com/-- designs and  
manufactures unique, whimsical and "Folksy with Attitude(SM)"
gifts and collectibles, known for their high quality and
affordable pricing.  The Company and its debtor-affiliates filed
for chapter 11 protection on Oct. 16, 2005 (Bankr. Md. Lead Case
No. 05-43793).  Matthew A. Cantor, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP
represents the Debtors in their restructuring efforts.  As of
June 30, 2005, Boyds reported $66.9 million in total assets and
$101.7 million in total debts.


BUFFETS HOLDINGS: Moody's Affirms Caa1 Sr. Unsecured Notes' Rating
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Buffets Holdings, Inc.'s B2
corporate family rating and changed the outlook to developing
following the company's public announcement that it plans to
engage advisors to assist in exploring various strategic
alternatives to maximize shareholder value.  

At the same time, the rating agency affirmed Holdings' senior
unsecured rating of Caa1 as well as all ratings at Buffets, Inc.,
the operating company.

The developing outlook incorporates uncertainty as to the timing,
nature and potential impact on creditors resulting from any
actions taken by the company.  However, Moody's added that the
revised outlook anticipates a near-to-intermediate term
resolution.  The rating agency will continue to monitor
developments and take further rating action once the outcome is
announced.

Ratings affirmed with a developing outlook:

  Buffets Holdings, Inc.:

     * B2 corporate family rating and Caa1 on the senior unsecured
       notes maturing in 2010

Ratings affirmed:

  Buffets, Inc.:

     * B1 on the senior secured credit facility and B3 on the
       subordinated notes maturing in 2010

Buffets, Inc., headquartered in Eagan, Minnesota, operates
approximately 350 buffet-style restaurants in 33 states and
franchises 18 buffet-style restaurants principally under the
"Hometown Buffet" and "Old Country Buffet" brand names.


CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES: S&P Affirms Corporate Credit Rating at B+
---------------------------------------------------------------
On Jan. 20, 2006, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its
ratings, including its 'B+' corporate credit rating, on recycled
paperboard producer, Caraustar Industries Inc.  The outlook is
stable.
     
"The affirmation reflects our expectations that Caraustar's weak
financial profile will strengthen to a level more appropriate for
the ratings following significant debt reduction," said Standard &
Poor's credit analyst Pamela Rice.
     
The company plans to use $150 million of proceeds from the sale of
its partnership interest in its Standard Gypsum joint venture with
Temple-Inland Inc. (BBB/Stable/A-2), plus cash on hand, bank
borrowings, and proceeds from other potential asset sales to
retire more than one-half of its long-term debt.
     
Austell, Georgia-based Caraustar also announced plans to exit its
coated recycled boxboard mill and specialty contract packaging
businesses as part of its strategic transformation plan.  The sale
of these businesses will reduce the company's product diversity
and forward integration as well as eliminate the meaningful cash
dividend the company has been receiving from unrated Standard
Gypsum LLC ($26.5 million in 2005).  

However, greater focus on its remaining businesses, where it has
several leadership positions; significantly lower interest
expense; and improved earnings from the sale of certain businesses
(including the company's Hunt Valley corrugated packaging plant
that was recently sold) and that were operating at negative EBITDA
levels offset the slightly weaker business profile.  Total debt
was $546 million at Sept. 30, 2005, with trailing-12-month debt to
EBITDA, including joint venture dividends, a very aggressive 6.8x.
     
"We expect this credit measure to improve to an acceptable 4x-5x
range following these transactions," Ms. Rice said.  "The outlook
could be revised to negative if market conditions worsen, if the
company is unable to realize sufficient benefits from its cost-
reduction efforts, or if it is unable to raise selling prices to
at least offset rising raw-material costs.  Caraustar's business
profile could support a slightly higher rating; however, a
positive outlook is unlikely unless the company were committed to
a less-aggressive capital structure, even incorporating the
planned debt reduction."


CAREMORE HOLDINGS: Moody's Rates Proposed $150 Mil. Facility at B2
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B2 debt rating to CareMore
Holdings, Inc.'s proposed $150 million senior secured bank credit
facility, which consists of:

   * a $125 million seven year term loan; and
   * a $25 million six year revolving credit facility.

In conjunction with this rating, Moody's also assigned a Ba3
insurance financial strength rating to CareMore's regulated
operating subsidiary, California Health Plan.  The outlook on the
ratings is stable.

According to Moody's, JPMorgan Partners, and Crystal Cove
Partners, will use the proceeds of the term loan along with an
additional cash investment to purchase Care More.  In addition,
the Managing Partner of Crystal Cove, Alan Hoops will become the
CEO of CareMore.  Mr. Hoops was co-founder, Chairman, and CEO of
PacifiCare.

Moody's notes that while CareMore has assumed Medicare healthcare
insurance risk through risk-sharing capitation agreements since
1996, it assumed full-risk exposure in these capitation agreements
only since 2002.  The Company also operates in a health care
insurance capacity through its own health plan, which was
introduced in 2002.  Through its unique Medicare health model, the
rating agency said, the company has been successful in managing
medical cost trend; however, the administrative expenses have been
higher than those for a typical Medicare healthcare provider.
Nevertheless, according to Moody's, CareMore has produced solid
after tax margins for 2005.  Moody's stated that while the company
has capital in excess of the tangible net equity requirements of
the California Department of Managed Healthcare, the company's
NAIC risk based capital model is only 86% of company action level.

Moody's notes that while current reimbursement levels and market
conditions are favorable in the Medicare Advantage market, there
are risks associated with this business.  The chief concern is the
uncertainty of the future level of reimbursements, as budgetary
and political pressures could change the government's perspective
towards the Medicare program.  In addition, Moody's says that it
has concerns with respect to:

   * the limited geographic area in which CareMore markets its
     products;

   * its limited track record;

   * the change in leadership at the company; and

   * the sustainability of the model for an extended period of
     time.

Moody's stated that the B2 senior secured rating and Ba3 IFSR
reflect the company's dependence on the Medicare product as well
as the concerns listed above, however, they also recognize the
strong Medicare market that currently exists and the potential for
strong returns under CareMore's healthcare model.  The ratings
also reflect the company's commitment for debt repayment of only
50% of excess cash flow, and the below 100% RBC level.

Moody's says the ratings are based on the expectation:

   * that there are no changes in the methodology used by the
     Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in
     determining the Medicare Advantage reimbursement rates;

   * that there are no losses or impairments to CareMore's
     Medicare contract with CMS;

   * that at least 50% of excess cash flow is used for debt
     repayment;

   * that the company issues no additional debt; and

   * that it maintains a consolidated NAIC RBC of at least 75% of
     company action level.

Moody's also expects that there are no significant changes to the
financial covenants contained in the secured bank credit facility
and all covenants will be met or exceeded.

The rating agency stated that the ratings could move up if:

   * NAIC RBC grows to 100% of company action level;

   * debt to EBITDA falls below 2 times;

   * EBITDA to interest expense exceeds 7 times; and

   * the company commits to 100% of excess cash flow being used
     for debt repayment.

However, ratings could be move down:

   * if there is a significant adverse change in Medicare
     reimbursement levels or a loss or impairment of CareMore's
     Medicare contract with CMS;

   * if EBITDA to interest expense falls below 2 times;

   * if net earnings margins fall below 3%; or

   * if a significant portion of debt is not retired each year.

CareMore is a leading healthcare provider serving approximately
20,000 Medicare beneficiaries in Los Angeles and Orange counties
in California.  Coverage is provided under two Medicare plans:

   1) Blue Shield Value Plan/65 Plus (through an agreement with
      Blue Shield of California); and

   2) California Medicare Advantage (a CareMore product).

CareMore's unique "controlled clinical approach", which is focused
on the identification and management of frail patients, preventive
care programs and prudent cost management, has led to an industry-
leading medical loss ratio.  The company also provides
administrative services for affiliated physicians.

These ratings were assigned with a stable outlook:

  CareMore Holdings, Inc.:

     * senior secured debt rating of B2

  California Health Plan:

     * insurance financial strength rating of Ba3

CareMore Holdings, Inc. will be headquartered in Downey,
California.  As of Sept. 30, 2005 California Health Plan reported
a Tangible Net Equity of approximately $8.3 million on a statutory
basis.  For the nine month period ending Sept. 30, 2005 total
revenue was $144 million.


CAREMORE HOLDINGS: S&P Rates Proposed $150 Million Facilities at B
------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned its 'B' counterparty
credit rating to CareMore Holdings Inc. (CHI).
     
Standard & Poor's also said that the outlook on CHI is stable.
     
At the same time, Standard & Poor's assigned its 'B' bank loan
rating and a recovery rating of '4' to CHI's proposed $125 million
senior secured credit facility due in 2013 and $25 million
revolving credit facility due in 2012, indicating the expectation
for a marginal recovery of principal (25%-50%) in the event of a
payment default.  The bank loan ratings are based on preliminary
documentation.
      
"The ratings are based on CareMore's established niche competitive
position and good earnings profile/cash-flow capacity," said
Standard & Poor's credit analyst Joseph Marinucci.  "Offsetting
these positive factors are the company's narrow product
scope/geographic concentration and marginal balance-sheet
quality."
     
CHI is a downstream holding company formed by CareMore Health
Group Inc. to acquire CareMore Medical Enterprises (CareMore),
which is a physician practice management company and parent to
California Health Plan Inc., a Managed Medicare HMO conducting
business in California in Los Angeles and Orange counties.
     
CHI will use the proceeds from the senior secured loan to
partially finance its acquisition of CareMore.  The remainder will
be financed with equity contributed by the lead financial sponsor,
JPMorgan Partners (the majority owner of CareMore Health Group
Inc.).
     
Standard & Poor's expects CareMore to achieve modest organic
enrollment growth over the near term (one year) and moderate
growth over the intermediate term (three years).  By year-end
2006, Standard & Poor's expects enrollment to grow by 5% to
20,000-22,000 members.  If CHI effectively secures its new credit
facilities and meets Standard & Poor's earnings expectations for
2006, pretax income would result in an ROR of more than 10%.  Debt
to EBITDA and interest coverage metrics would remain moderately
conservative for the rating category.
     
CareMore has an established niche competitive position.  Its
market-segment focus has enabled it to develop its brand and grow
its market presence despite the existence of larger and more
strongly financed competitors.  CareMore derives a competitive
advantage from its integrated care-management model, which has
produced relatively strong earnings and a stable cash-flow stream
that S&P expects to be sustained over the intermediate term.


CENTRAL GARDEN: Farnam Purchase Prompts Moody's to Review Ratings
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed the ratings of Central Garden &
Pet Company on review for possible downgrade following Central's
agreement to purchase animal health care product company, Farnam
Companies, Inc., for around $291 million.  The review is prompted
by the meaningful size of the purchase price relative to Central's
existing debt levels (around $323 million reported at September
2005), and therefore the potential for the transaction to weaken
Central's financial profile.

These ratings were placed under review for possible downgrade:

   * Corporate family rating (formerly senior implied rating),
     Ba3;

   * $125 million senior secured revolving credit facility
     due 2008, Ba2;

   * $175 million senior secured term loan "B" due 2009, Ba2; and

   * $150 million senior subordinated notes due 2013, B1.

Moody's review will focus on the financing of the proposed
acquisition and its impact on the company's credit metrics.  As
always, Moody's review will include an assessment of the earnings
and cash flow potential of the acquired business, including its
alignment with existing business units and Central's plans for
operational consolidation.  In addition, Moody's will evaluate the
acquisition in the context of Central's long-term strategic and
financial policies, including acceptable purchase price multiples
and leverage targets.

Importantly, Moody's notes that Central had substantial cushion in
its pre-acquisition financial profile (relative to its Ba3
corporate family rating), with leverage around 2.9x (September
2005, including Moody's standard adjustments).  As such, Moody's
may not consider the leverage increase associated with the
acquisition to be sufficient to warrant a downgrade of the
corporate family rating.  Nonetheless, the review will also assess
the implications of the financing on the notching of Central's
senior secured and senior subordinated debt, considering their
relative positions in the capital structure and coverages.

Central Garden & Pet Company, located in Walnut Creek, California,
manufactures a broadening array of branded lawn and garden and pet
supply products, and operates as a distributor for other
manufacturers' products in both of these segments.  Central's
subsidiaries have leading positions in niche markets, including:

in the Garden Products Group:

   * Pennington (grass seed),
   * AMDRO (fire ant bait),
   * Norcal Pottery, and
   * New England Pottery; and

in the Pet Products group:

   * Four Paws (dog and cat supplies),
   * Kaytee (birdseed),
   * All-Glass Aquarium,
   * Nylabone, and
   * TFH (pet books and dog chews) names.

Net sales for the twelve-month period ended September 2005 were
approximately $1.4 billion.


CENTRAL GARDEN: Farnam Purchase Prompts S&P's Negative Watch
------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services placed its ratings on Walnut
Creek, California-based lawn and garden and pet products supplier
Central Garden & Pet Co., including its 'BB' corporate credit
rating, on CreditWatch with negative implications.  Negative
implications means that the ratings could be affirmed or lowered
following the completion of Standard & Poor's review.  Total debt
outstanding at Sept. 24, 2005, was about $323 million.
     
The CreditWatch listing follows the announcement by Central Garden
that it has agreed to acquire the stock of Farnam Companies Inc.
for about $287 million, plus $4 million for the purchase of
related real property.  Farnam, with annual sales of about $160
million, is a manufacturer and marketer of equine and pet health
care products.  The transaction is expected to be debt financed
and is targeted to close by March 2006, subject to regulatory
approval.

Standard & Poor's estimates Central Garden's existing lease
adjusted average total debt to EBITDA of about 3.3x will increase
to well over 4x following the proposed acquisition.  Standard &
Poor's will review Central Garden's near- and longer-term growth
objectives, operating outlook, and overall financial policies to
resolve the CreditWatch listing.


CHESAPEAKE ENERGY: Buys Oil & Natural Gas Properties for $796 Mil.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE: CHK) entered into agreements
with seven private companies to acquire oil and natural gas assets
located in its Barnett Shale, South Texas, Permian Basin, Mid-
Continent and East Texas regions for an aggregate purchase price
of approximately $796 million in cash.

On the acquired properties, Chesapeake has identified 260 proved
undeveloped and 480 probable and possible drilling locations.

After allocating $339 million of the $796 million purchase price
to unproven assets, Chesapeake's acquisition cost for the 264 bcfe
of internally estimated proved reserves will be approximately
$1.73 per thousand cubic feet of natural gas equivalent.  Based on
the company's projected development plan, which includes       
$909 million of anticipated future drilling and development costs,
Chesapeake estimates that its all-in cost of acquiring and
developing the 660 bcfe of total reserves will be $2.58 per mcfe.

Based on the current purchase price, the acquisitions are located
34% in the Barnett Shale, 34% in South Texas, 12% in the Permian
Basin, 11% in the Mid-Continent and 9% in East Texas.  
Chesapeake's Barnett Shale acreage now exceeds 73,000 net acres on
which it has drilled 54 wells to date and believes it can drill an
additional 750-850 wells.  On average, Chesapeake has developed
2.3 bcfe per well with its Barnett Shale wells to date.  In the
Barnett, Chesapeake currently operates 155 wells and has five rigs
drilling new wells.  The company intends to increase its Barnett
Shale rig count to 10 rigs by mid-2006 and to 12-15 rigs by   
year-end 2006.

Chesapeake has recently closed three of the transactions for
approximately $486 million in cash and expects to close the
remaining acquisitions by Feb. 28, 2006.  The pending acquisitions
are subject to customary closing conditions and purchase price
adjustments, but are not conditioned on the closing of any of the
other transactions.

Chesapeake intends to finance the acquisitions initially by using
its bank credit facility and ultimately by issuing a balance of
senior notes and equity securities during 2006 for any acquisition
amounts that exceed the company's cash flow less E&P capital
expenditures.

        Acquires 13 Drilling Rigs from Martex Drilling

Through its wholly-owned subsidiary Nomac Drilling Corporation,
Chesapeake has also recently agreed to acquire 13 drilling rigs
and related assets from Martex Drilling Company, L.L.P., a
privately-held drilling contractor with operations in East Texas
and North Louisiana, for $150 million.

Chesapeake is acquiring the rigs to accelerate its drilling
activity in the Barnett Shale, Ark-La-Tex and Fayetteville Shale
regions, areas where rigs are in especially short supply.  With
the ownership of more rigs, Chesapeake believes it can accelerate
the conversion of its large inventory of proved undeveloped,  
probable and possible reserves in these areas into producing
wells.

Chesapeake currently leases one of the 13 Martex rigs and an E&P
affiliate of Martex, Camterra Resources, Inc. is leasing two of
the 13 rigs through early 2008.

                       Management Comment

"We are pleased to announce these recent acquisitions for several
reasons," Aubrey K. McClendon, Chesapeake's Chief Executive
Officer, commented.  "First, they will add to our large and
growing presence in the Barnett Shale, South Texas, Permian Basin,
Mid-Continent and East Texas regions, all areas of strategic
importance to Chesapeake.  Second, these acquisitions have all of
the attributes of successful previous Chesapeake transactions --
acquisitions from private companies of low-cost, high-margin
natural gas properties that have significant exploitation and
exploration potential.  We are confident that Chesapeake can
deliver significant shareholder value from the acquired properties
for years to come."

Headquartered in Oklahoma City, Chesapeake Energy Corporation --
http://www.chkenergy.com/-- is the second largest independent  
producer of natural gas in the U.S.  The company's operations are
focused on exploratory and developmental drilling and property
acquisitions in the Mid-Continent, Permian Basin, South Texas,
Texas Gulf Coast, Barnett Shale, Ark-La-Tex and Appalachian Basin
regions of the United States.

                       *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Nov. 8, 2005,
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned its 'BB' rating to oil
and gas exploration and production company Chesapeake Energy
Corp.'s $500 million senior notes due 2020 and its $600 million
2.75% contingent convertible senior notes due 2035.

Standard & Poor's also assigned its 'B' rating to Chesapeake's
$500 million 5% cumulative convertible preferred stock issue.
Amounts do not include overallotment options.

At the same time, Standard & Poor's affirmed its 'BB/B-1'
corporate credit rating on the company.

The outlook is stable.  Pro forma for the recent capital raises,
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma-based Chesapeake will have $5.4 billion in
debt outstanding.


DATICON INC: Files Amended List of 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Daticon, Inc., delivered to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Connecticut in New Haven an amended list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

The Debtor added Carl Keil to the list, and dropped Aircomm
Communications from the list.

The Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors are:

   Entity                        Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                        ---------------   ------------
Relational Funding Corporation   Equipment Lease     $1,218,111
3701 Algonquin Road, Suite 600
Rolling Meadows, IL 60008-3120

Hilltop Investment, LLC          Office Lease          $398,156
209 West Town Street
Norwich, CT 06360

Hogan & Hartson LLP              Legal Services        $229,223
555 Thirteenth Street NW
Washington, DC 20004-1109

EOP Operating Limited Partners   Los Angeles           $149,418
550 South Hope Street            Office Lease
Suite 2200
Los Angeles, CA 90071

Cendant Mobility                 Relocation             $92,026
                                 Services

RM Holdings, LLC                 Office Lease           $90,440

Carl Keil                                               $60,000

Citicorp Vendor Finance, Inc.    Equipment Lease        $57,328

DeLage Landen                    Equipment Lease        $55,000

Norwich Public Utilities         Utility                $48,724

The Oliver Group                 Tape Restoration       $32,531
                                 Services  

Marsh USA Inc.                   Insurance Brokerage    $19,746
                                 Services

Bearing Point                    Valuation              $18,900
                                 Services

Passumpsic Management LLC        Professional           $12,500
                                 Services

Staples Business Advantage       Office Supplies        $10,554

Corporate Express                Production and         $10,260
                                 Operating Supplies

Scan-Optics, LLC                 Office Equipment        $9,935
                                 Maintenance

Federal Express                  Freight provider        $7,595

Minogue Birnbaum LLP             Legal Services          $5,505

Consumers Interstate                                     $4,555

Headquartered in Norwich, Connecticut, Daticon, Inc. --
http://www.daticon.com/-- works with law firms, corporations and  
government agencies to capture, review and manage the volumes of
electronic data and paper documents generated by complex
litigation, merger and acquisition transactions, and
investigations.  The Debtor filed for chapter 11 protection on
Jan. 17, 2006 (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 06-30034).  Douglas S.
Skalka, Esq., at Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, PC, represents the
Debtor in its restructuring efforts.  When the Debtor filed for
protection from its creditors, it listed $9,089,033 in assets and
$18,997,028 in debts as of Dec. 31, 2005.


DATICON INC: Wants to Hire Neubert Pepe as Bankruptcy Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Daticon, Inc., asks the Honorable Lorraine Murphy Weil of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut in New Haven for
permission to employ Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, PC, as its
bankruptcy counsel.

Neubert Pepe will:

   (a) advise the Debtor of its rights, powers and duties as
       debtor-in-possession continuing to operate and manage the
       business and property;

   (b) advise and assist the Debtor concerning the negotiation and
       documentation of financing agreements, debt restructuring
       and related transactions;

   (c) review the nature and validity of any liens asserted
       against the property of the Debtor and advise the Debtor
       concerning the enforceability of those liens;

   (d) advise the Debtor concerning the actions that might be
       taken to collect and recover property for the benefit of
       the Debtor's estate;

   (e) prepare, on the Debtor's behalf, necessary and appropriate
       applications, motions, pleadings, draft orders, notices,
       schedules and other documents and review all financial and
       other reports to be filed in the Debtor's case;

   (f) advise and prepare the Debtor's responses concerning
       applications, motions, pleadings, notices and other papers
       filed and served in the Debtor's case;

   (g) counsel the Debtor in connection with the formulation,
       negotiation and prosecution of a plan of reorganization and
       related documents; and

   (h) perform all other legal services for and on behalf of the
       Debtor, which may be necessary or appropriate in the
       administration of the Debtor's bankruptcy case.

Douglas S. Skalka, Esq., a principal at Neubert, Pepe & Monteith,
PC, disclosed that the Firm will be paid its customary hourly
rates.  Papers filed with the Court did not specify those rates.

Mr. Skalka assures the Court that Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, PC, is
disinterested as that term is defined in Section 101(14) of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

With offices in New Haven and Southport, Connecticut, Neubert,
Pepe & Monteith, PC -- http://www.npmlaw.com/-- has substantial  
expertise in the areas of civil litigation and appeals, labor and
employment law, corporate law, bankruptcy, administrative law,
banking, real estate, health care, and managed care.

The Firm can be contacted at:

          Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, PC
          195 Church Street
          New Haven, CT 06510
          Tel: (203) 821-2000
          Fax: (203) 821-2009

Headquartered in Norwich, Connecticut, Daticon, Inc. --
http://www.daticon.com/-- works with law firms, corporations and  
government agencies to capture, review and manage the volumes of
electronic data and paper documents generated by complex
litigation, merger and acquisition transactions, and
investigations.  The Debtor filed for chapter 11 protection on
Jan. 17, 2006 (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 06-30034).  When the
Debtor filed for protection from its creditors, it listed
$9,089,033 in assets and $18,997,028 in debts as of Dec. 31, 2005.


DELTA AIRLINES: Has Until July 11 to File Chapter 11 Plan
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
extended until July 11, 2006, the period within which Delta Air
Lines Inc. and its debtor-affiliates have the exclusive right to
file a chapter 11 plan.  The Court also extended the Debtors'
period to solicit acceptances of that plan until Sept. 9, 2006.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 3, 2006, the
Debtors want to avoid the necessity of formulating a
Reorganization Plan prematurely and to ensure that their
Reorganization Plan best addresses the interests of their estates,
employees, and creditors.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtors have worked diligently to
stabilize their businesses and reassure customers, suppliers and
employees.  Among other things, the Debtors:

   (a) have obtained Court approval for postpetition credit
       facilities totaling $2,200,000,000 that are expected to
       provide sufficient liquidity to enable them to operate
       while in Chapter 11;

   (b) have been seeking to enter into a new agreement with a
       credit card processor;

   (c) have been seeking to complete the sale of a major
       operating subsidiary;

   (d) have started the process of analyzing hundreds of leases
       and executory contracts, including aircraft and equipment
       leases, to identify those that are beneficial to their
       estates and to reject those that are not;

   (d) have been working with the Section 1114 committee
       appointed by the Court to effect certain changes to health
       benefits; and

   (e) have been addressing a multitude of creditor, supplier and
       customer inquiries from around the world;

Marshall S. Huebner, Esq., at Davis Polk & Wardwell, in New York,
relates that the Debtors have also devoted significant attention
to evaluate their numerous aircraft and equipment leases and
rationalizing their fleet.  The Debtors have unilaterally agreed
to perform their obligations under Section 1110 of the Bankruptcy
Code with respect to a number of their aircraft and have also
negotiated numerous stipulations with aircraft lessors regarding
Section 1110-related matters.

In addition, the Debtors have spent extensive time and resources
negotiating and finalizing an interim agreement with the pilots'
union regarding modifications to their collective bargaining
agreement.  The Debtors have a pending request under Section 1113
to reject the CBA after negotiations were initially unsuccessful.
The Debtors have devoted substantial resources to preparing for
and litigating that request.

Although the Debtors' developing business plan is a work in
progress and will continue to evolve, the Debtors have been
engaged with the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors on
their progress and have made multiple formal and informal
presentations to the Creditors Committee or its advisors about
it.  Mr. Huebner says that the Creditors Committee and its
advisors have been given access to the Debtors' financial
advisors and financial officers, and to voluminous information,
in order to help the Creditors Committee evaluate the Debtors
businesses and plans.

The Debtors' goal is to develop and propose a Reorganization Plan
that will receive support from their various constituencies.
Additional work and progress is necessary on many fronts in
connection with the eventual development of a Reorganization
Plan.  Mr. Huebner explains that continued progress, among other
things, on the Section 1110 process and the Section 1113 process,
including securing a comprehensive permanent agreement with the
pilots' union, make it premature at this time for the Debtors to
submit a Reorganization Plan.

Specifically, an extension of the Debtors' Exclusive Periods is
required to enable the Debtors to:

   (i) continue to refine their business model to deliver both a
       more efficient cost-structure and future revenue growth so
       that the Debtors can compete effectively within the global
       commercial passenger aviation industry;

  (ii) further implement specific restructuring initiatives, like
       the rationalization of their route structure and aircraft
       fleet and a reduction in their employee-related costs;

(iii) begin to explore possible sources of exit financing to
       provide adequate liquidity upon emergence from Chapter 11;
       and

  (iv) develop a Reorganization Plan reflecting the desired
       initiatives set forth and the many others that are
       underway.

Mr. Huebner assures the Court that the request is not intended as
a negotiation tactic or a means of maintaining leverage over any
group of creditors whose interests may be harmed by an extension.

Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, Delta Air Lines --
http://www.delta.com/-- is the world's second-largest airline in
terms of passengers carried and the leading U.S. carrier across
the Atlantic, offering daily flights to 502 destinations in 88
countries on Delta, Song, Delta Shuttle, the Delta Connection
carriers and its worldwide partners.  The Company and 18
affiliates filed for chapter 11 protection on Sept. 14, 2005
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 05-17923).  Marshall S. Huebner,
Esq., at Davis Polk & Wardwell, represents the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts.  As of June 30, 2005, the Company's balance
sheet showed $21.5 billion in assets and $28.5 billion in
liabilities.  (Delta Air Lines Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 18;
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., 215/945-7000)


DELTA AIR: Committee Wants Aviation Specialists as Consultant
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed in Delta
Air Lines Inc. and its debtor-affiliates chapter 11 cases, seeks
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York's
consent to retain Aviation Specialists Group, Inc., as its
aircraft valuation consultant, effective as of Dec. 19, 2005.

Jordan S. Weltman, chairperson of the Creditors Committee, asserts
that ASG is qualified to assist the Committee with respect to
critical valuation and other issues involving the 89 aircraft that
are subject to the Restructuring Term Sheet entered into by the
Debtors and an ad hoc committee of holders of aircraft indebtness,
and other matters affecting the Debtors' aircraft.

According to Mr. Weltman, ASG has valued billions of dollars worth
of jetliners, regional aircraft, corporate airplanes, engines and
spare parts, and has extensive practical aviation industry
experience, including in the areas of finance, operating leasing,
asset management, airframe and engine maintenance and market
analysis.

ASG will:

   (a) review the Debtors' operating lease rental levels;

   (b) review the Debtors' maintenance reserves;

   (c) review lease return conditions;

   (d) provide testimony in Court on behalf of the Committee,
       if necessary and appropriate, with respect to market terms
       and competitive issues involved in connection with the
       transaction contemplated in the Restructuring Term Sheet
       and other matters in connection with the Debtors' chapter
       11 cases; and

   (e) provide other services as may be appropriate.

ASG will be paid at $250 per hour for consulting services rendered
by its principals.  ASG will also seek reimbursement of out-of-
pocket expenses incurred in connection with its retention by the
Creditors Committee.

The Creditors Committee proposes that the Debtors indemnify ASG
from and against losses, claims, damages or liabilities in
connection with ASG's retention.

Fred J. Klein, president of ASG, will head the team that will
provide consulting services to the Committee.  Mr. Klein
discloses that, from time to time, ASG has provided services, and
likely will continue to provide services, to certain creditors and
equity holders of the Debtors in matters unrelated to their
Chapter 11 cases.

Mr. Klein also reports that ASG has performed aircraft appraisals
and inspections and audits of aircraft maintenance records
concerning various aircraft owned and operated by Delta Air
Lines, Inc.

Mr. Klein anticipates that ASG will be required by its
longstanding clients to continue performing services with regard
to Delta Aircraft while the Firm is employed by the Creditors
Committee.  However, he assures the Court that ASG will establish
an "ethical wall" between him and his partner, Stuart Rubin, who
will be responsible for matters involving the Delta Aircraft.

In addition, ASG will not, while employed by the Creditors
Committee, perform any services for its other clients concerning
aircraft that are subject of (i) the Restructuring Term Sheet, or
(ii) any other matters concerning which ASG is performing
consulting services for the Committee.

Mr. Klein assures the Court that ASG is a "disinterested person"
as defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, Delta Air Lines --
http://www.delta.com/-- is the world's second-largest airline in
terms of passengers carried and the leading U.S. carrier across
the Atlantic, offering daily flights to 502 destinations in 88
countries on Delta, Song, Delta Shuttle, the Delta Connection
carriers and its worldwide partners.  The Company and 18
affiliates filed for chapter 11 protection on Sept. 14, 2005
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 05-17923).  Marshall S. Huebner,
Esq., at Davis Polk & Wardwell, represents the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts.  As of June 30, 2005, the Company's balance
sheet showed $21.5 billion in assets and $28.5 billion in
liabilities.  (Delta Air Lines Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 18;
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., 215/945-7000)


DELTA AIR: Enters Section 1110(b) Stipulation for 14 Aircraft
-------------------------------------------------------------
Delta Air Lines Inc. and its debtor-affiliates entered into a
stipulation under Section 1110(b) of the Bankruptcy Code with
various parties who maintain interests in 14 Boeing 737 Aircraft
bearing U.S. Registration Nos. N301DL, N302DL, N303DL, N304DL,
N305DL, N306DL, N308DL, N309DL, N314DA, N326DL, N329DL, N330DL,
N305WA, and N306WA.

The Aircraft Parties are Castle Harbour-1 Limited Liability
Company, GE Commercial Aviation Services, LLC, General Electric
Capital Corporation, and SGE (New York) Associates.

The Aircraft are entitled to protections under Section 1110.  
However, the automatic stay under Section 362 vaporizes on the
60th day after the Petition Date, unless a debtor commits to full
contractual performance and cures on any defaults pursuant to a
Section 1110(a) Election.

Pursuant to Section 1110(b), however, the Debtors may enter into  
stipulations with aircraft lessors and financiers extending the  
time to perform the Section 1110 obligations.

The Debtors and the Aircraft Parties agree to extend the 60-day
period on undisclosed terms and conditions.

Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, Delta Air Lines --
http://www.delta.com/-- is the world's second-largest airline in
terms of passengers carried and the leading U.S. carrier across
the Atlantic, offering daily flights to 502 destinations in 88
countries on Delta, Song, Delta Shuttle, the Delta Connection
carriers and its worldwide partners.  The Company and 18
affiliates filed for chapter 11 protection on Sept. 14, 2005
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 05-17923).  Marshall S. Huebner,
Esq., at Davis Polk & Wardwell, represents the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts.  As of June 30, 2005, the Company's balance
sheet showed $21.5 billion in assets and $28.5 billion in
liabilities.  (Delta Air Lines Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 18;
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., 215/945-7000)


DMX MUSIC: Has Until February 9 to Remove Civil Actions
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware gave DMX
Music, Inc. and its debtor-affiliates, until Feb. 9, 2006, to
remove actions and related proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec.
1452 of and Rule 9027 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure.

The Debtors tell the Court that they been focusing all their
efforts on obtaining Court approval for the sale of substantially
all of their assets and the formulation of an appropriate plan of
liquidation.  The Debtors relate that they haven't had an
opportunity to thoroughly review pre-petition actions that needs
to be removed from other jurisdictions.

The Debtors say that the extension would afford them opportunity
to make fully informed decisions regarding the removal of each
pre-petition action and assure them that they do not forfeit
valuable rights under Section 1452 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Headquartered in Los Angeles, California, Maxide Acquisition,
Inc., dba DMX MUSIC, Inc. -- http://www.dmxmusic.com/-- is   
majority-owned by Liberty Digital, a subsidiary of Liberty Media
Corporation, with operations in more than 100 countries.  DMX
MUSIC distributes its music and visual services worldwide to more
than 11 million homes, 180,000 businesses, and 30 airlines with a
worldwide daily listening audience of more than 100 million
people.  The Company and its debtor-affiliates filed for chapter
11 protection on Feb. 14, 2005 (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 05-10431).  
The case is jointly administered with Maxide Acquisition, Inc.
(Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 05-10429).  Curtis A. Hehn, Esq., and
Laura Davis Jones, Esq., at Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, Young, Jones
& Weintraub P.C., represent the Debtors in their restructuring
efforts.  When the Debtors filed for protection from their
creditors, they estimated more than $100 million in assets and
debts.


DONALD GATZKE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Donald A. Gatzke
        Trustee for Donald A. Gatzke Trust
        243 Lake Blaine Drive
        Kalispell, Montana 59901-7629

Bankruptcy Case No.: 06-60020

Type of Business: The Debtor is a trustee for the
                  Donald A. Gatzke Trust.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 20, 2006

Court: District of Montana (Butte)

Debtor's Counsel: Gregory A. Luinstra, Esq.
                  Alexander, Baucus, Paul & Young, PLLC
                  P.O. Box 3169
                  Great Falls, Montana 59403
                  Tel: (406) 761-4800

Total Assets: $7,875,235

Total Debts:  $2,737,258

The Debtor does not have unsecured creditors who are not insiders.


DPAC TECH: Nov. 30 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $920,000
--------------------------------------------------------
DPAC Technologies Corp. (OTCBB:DPAC) reported results for its
fiscal year 2006 third quarter ended Nov. 30, 2005.  

For the third fiscal quarter, net sales from continuing operations
were $378,000 compared to net sales of $334,000 for the third
quarter of the previous year.

DPAC's net loss from continuing operations totaled $504,000.  The
net loss from continuing operations for the prior year's third
quarter was $1.4 million.

For the nine months ended Nov. 30, 2005, net sales from continuing
operations were $1.2 million as compared to $957,000 for the same
period in the prior fiscal year.

DPAC's net loss from continuing operations for the current-year
period totaled $3.2 million.  The net loss from continuing
operations for the prior year's nine-month period was $5 million,
and included $573,000 of restructuring charges.  During the
current year's nine-month period, DPAC expensed $595,000 of
acquisition costs incurred in regard to the QuaTech acquisition
transaction.

                      Balance Sheet Summary

At Nov. 30, 2005, DPAC had total assets of $1.2 million, including
cash and cash equivalents of $501,000 and no assets related to
discontinued operations.  This compares to total assets of     
$4.1 million at Feb. 28, 2005, which included $2.7 million in cash
and cash equivalents and $164,000 of assets related to
discontinued operations.

Working capital at November 30, 2005 was a deficit of $386,000
compared to working capital of $1.5 million at February 28, 2005.

As of Nov. 30, 2005, DPAC Technologies Corp.'s balance sheet
showed a stockholders' deficit of $920,000, compared to a
$1,439,000 positive equity in Feb. 28, 2005.

DPAC Technologies Corp., fka Dense-Pac Microsystems, Inc. --
http://www.dpactech.com/-- provides wireless connectivity   
products for industrial, transportation, medical and other
commercial applications.  The Airborne(TM) wireless Local Area
Network Node Module was introduced in September 2003 after an
initial year of research and development.  The product is designed
to enable OEM equipment designers to incorporate 802.11 wireless
LAN connectivity into their device, instrument or equipment
through the inclusion of the Company's Wireless LAN Node Module in
their system design.  The Company also sells Airborne(TM) Direct
plug-and-play wireless products that add 802.11 wireless
connectivity to legacy instruments and equipment that have a
pre-existing serial or Ethernet data port.

                          *     *     *

                       Going Concern Doubt

Moss Adams, LLP, expressed substantial doubt about DPAC
Technologies' ability to continue as a going concern after it
audited the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year
ended Feb. 28, 2005.  The auditing firm points to the Company's
continuing losses from operations and negative operating cash
flow.

The Company's former independent auditor, Deloitte & Touche, LLP,
had issued a clean and unqualified opinion after auditing the
Company's financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30,
2004 and 2003.


DRS TECHS: Fitch Assigns Low-B Ratings to $1.7 Billion Debts
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has initiated these ratings for DRS Technologies,
Inc.:

    * Issuer Default Rating 'B+';

    * proposed senior secured credit facility 'BB+'/Recovery
      Rating '1';

    * proposed senior notes 'BB/RR2'; and

    * proposed and existing senior subordinated notes 'B-/RR6'.

Rating Outlook Stable.

These actions assume that the Engineered Support Systems, Inc.
(EASI) acquisition and associated debt issuances close under the
announced terms.  Approximately $1.7 billion of existing and
proposed debt is covered by these actions.

On Sept. 22, 2005, DRS announced its plans to acquire EASI for
$2.1 billion utilizing a combination of new debt, DRS shares and
cash on hand.  Pricing for the transaction is approximately 12.4
times fiscal 2005 EBITDA.  The transaction, which remains subject
to shareholder approval of both companies, is expected to close by
the end of January.

The ratings reflect:

   * continued high levels of defense spending;

   * good pro forma free cash flow generation;

   * DRS' proven ability to increase margins at acquired
     companies;

   * expected growth in homeland security spending; and

   * healthy pro forma EBITDA margins.

The ratings also consider DRS' diversification within the defense
and homeland security arena, and the alignment between DRS'
products and services and expected Department's of Defense (DoD)
and Homeland Security needs, all of which will be aided by the
EASI acquisition.  Fitch's concerns center on:

   * DRS' ability to integrate EASI;

   * the company's future acquisition plans;

   * limited financial flexibility due to high debt levels;

   * potential changes within the DoD budget;

   * the price being paid for EASI; and

   * Securities and Exchange Commission investigations of
     EASI.

Fitch's ratings and Stable Outlook incorporate expectations for
deployment of free cash flow toward debt reduction in the next 12
months.  In addition, the Outlook is based on the favorable effect
of DoD supplemental budgets offset by near-term concerns about
uncertainty in the DoD budget related to overall spending
pressures due to the federal budget deficit, the Quadrennial
Defense Review (QDR), and 'transformation.'

The recovery ratings and notching in the debt structure reflect
Fitch's recovery expectations under a scenario in which distressed
enterprise value is allocated to the various debt classes.  The
recovery ratings for the senior secured credit facility ('RR1',
reflecting expected 100% recovery) and the senior unsecured notes
('RR2', reflecting expected recovery of 70%-90%) benefit from
substantial cushions of subordinated debt and equity as well as
covenants that preclude the issuance of significant amounts of
debt without sizable increases in EBITDA.  The senior subordinated
debt ratings ('RR6') reflect the expectation of poor recovery
prospects in a distressed case.

Potential DoD budgetary constraints going forward remain a concern
for the defense sector, as do potential funding shifts within the
DoD budget.  Current indications are that the QDR will be less
disruptive than anticipated, reducing Fitch's concerns.  As such,
Fitch believes that large program cancellations would be a
surprise, but program restructurings such as reductions or
deferrals are likely.  Fitch expects that DRS could benefit from
new program delays as they would lead to more upgrade and
modernization business for existing platforms.  DRS' diverse
contract base also mitigates the risk of program delays or funding
shifts.  The loss of revenues resulting from an end to the
conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan is also a concern, but the
impact would probably result in slower organic growth rather than
overall revenue declines.

In the longer term, U.S. budget pressures could strengthen the
trend in U.S. government outsourcing, providing defense service
providers such as EASI an opportunity to enter new markets.

In acquiring EASI, DRS will be increasing its standalone projected
fiscal 2007 revenues of $1.7 billion by nearly three-quarters to
$2.9 billion, making it by far DRS' largest acquisition.
Mitigating the risks related to the acquisition are DRS' successes
in managing prior acquisitions and the lack of product overlap
between the two companies.  Given DRS' acquisitive nature, Fitch
is concerned about the company's acquisition appetite going
forward, but management has indicated it plans to digest EASI and
improve credit ratios prior to making significant acquisitions.
Pricing for the EASI transaction is high, but it is in line with
recent acquisitions in the defense sector.  In addition, the
acquisition complements DRS' existing portfolio, which should
allow DRS to provide turn-key solutions to customers.

The SEC investigations of EASI revolve around potential insider
trading by a former director and officer in one instance.  The
other investigation is related to whether or not a stop-work order
was a material enough event to warrant disclosure at the time it
occurred.  Fitch does not expect the outcome of the investigations
to have a material impact on DRS.

Pro forma leverage utilizing Fitch's global definition of debt-to-
operating EBITDA was 5.4x for the LTM ended Sept. 30, 2005,
substantially higher than actual results of 3.7x.  Pro forma
interest coverage, using Fitch's global definition of operating
EBITDA-to-interest, was 2.9x for the same period, significantly
lower than the actual results of 4.1x.  

Going forward, Fitch expects these ratios to improve as DRS
utilizes free cash to reduce debt.


ECHOSTAR DBS: S&P Rates $1.5 Billion 7.125% Senior Notes at BB-
---------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned its 'BB-' rating to
EchoStar DBS Corp.'s $1.5 billion 7.125% senior notes due 2016.
This offering represents an upsizing of the previously announced
$1 billion senior notes, which we rated on Jan. 19, 2006.  
EchoStar DBS is a subsidiary of EchoStar Communications Corp., a
Littleton, Colorado-based satellite DTH TV provider.
     
Proceeds will be used to call the $442 million 9.125% senior notes
due 2009 and for general corporate purposes.  The 'BB-'corporate
credit rating on EchoStar and its subsidiaries was affirmed.
     
The transaction will boost EchoStar's cash balance by about $1
billion and increase gross debt to EBITDA leverage to about 3.8x,
from 3.3x, for the 12 months ended Sept. 30, 2005, still within an
acceptable limit for the ratings.


ELWOOD ENERGY: S&P Affirms $402 Million Sr. Sec. Bonds' B+ Rating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its 'B+' rating on
Elwood Energy LLC's $402 million 8.159% ($335 million outstanding)
senior secured bonds due 2026.
     
At the same time, the outlook was revised to stable from negative,
reflecting an improvement in the near-term prospects of Aquila
Inc. (B-/Watch Pos/B-3), a major power offtaker whose ratings were
placed on CreditWatch with positive implications on
Sept. 22, 2005.
     
Elwood is a 1,409 MW peaking power plant that sells into the Mid-
American Interconnected Network (MAIN), and is fully contracted
through 2012 and partially through 2017.
     
The ratings on Elwood reflect Aquila's:

   * credit risk;

   * exposure to partial merchant risk from 2013;

   * full merchant risk after 2017; and

   * power contracts that are above market due to the MAIN's
     excess generating capacity, which could depress power prices
     for years to come.
     
Offsetting these risks are:

   * revenues from a highly creditworthy offtaker,
     Exelon Generation Co. LLC (BBB+/Watch Neg/A-2), representing
     52% of cash flows through 2012;

   * $37.7 million of collateral posted by Aquila that covers 12
     months of capacity payments; and

   * a good operations track record, with availabilities that have
     averaged above 99% since operations began.
      
"A downgrade could occur if Aquila's credit deteriorates, and an
upgrade is unlikely until prospects for merchant peak generators
in the MAIN improve," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst
Chinelo Chidozie.

Nevertheless, Elwood's ratings remain notched above those of
Aquila because of stable cash flows from its purchase-power
agreement with Exelon Corp. and a solid liquidity position.


EURAMAX INT'L: Moody's Affirms $190 Mil. Term Loan's Junk Rating
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the long term debt ratings of
Euramax International, Inc.  The ratings outlook is stable.

Ratings affirmed include:

Euramax International, Inc. and co-issuer Euramax International
Holdings B.V.:

   * B2 - Guaranteed first lien senior secured tranche B term
     loan, $332 million due 2012

   * Caa1 - Guaranteed second lien senior secured term loan,
     $190 million due 2012

Euramax Netherlands B.V., Euramax Holdings Limited (UK), Euramax
Europe B.V.:

   * B2 - Guaranteed first lien senior secured tranche B term
     loan, $118 million due 2012

Euramax International, Inc., co-issuer Euramax International
Holdings B.V., Euramax Holdings Limited (UK), Euramax Europe B.V.,
Euramax Netherlands B.V.:

   * B2 - Guaranteed first lien senior secured revolving credit
     facility, $80 million due 2011

Euramax International, Inc.:

   * B2 - Corporate Family Rating

Euramax's B2 corporate family rating incorporates:

   * its leading market position in a number of niche markets,
     including:

     -- roof drainage products and

     -- fabricated aluminum, steel, fiberglass, and vinyl products
        for construction and recreation vehicles; and

   * its ability to consistently generate free cash flow despite
     high financial leverage.  

Moody's believes that operating margins will remain relatively
stable despite the strain from raw material inflation, increased
labor costs, and competitive pressures.  The ratings also capture
Euramax's:

   * high degree of financial leverage;

   * vulnerability to cyclical end-use markets and raw material
     price volatility; and

   * significant customer concentration risks with retail home
     centers.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's belief that despite prospects
for continued weakness should home repair and remodeling activity
wane as interest rates increase and the potential negative impact
that higher fuel costs could have on RV sales, Euramax will
continue to generate free cash flow in FY2006.  However, given
recent weak operating performance, Moody's believes the company
could have limited capacity to increase borrowings under its
senior secured revolver due to potentially narrow compliance with
restrictive financial covenants during the 1st and 2nd quarters of
2006 given seasonal working capital needs.  Factoring in next
year's expected level of EBITDA, free cash flow and debt
amortization requirements, the stable outlook is predicated on
Euramax maintaining EBITDA margins of approximately 10%, debt-to-
EBITDA under 6.0x (or approximately 6.5x including the holding
company PIK note) and free cash flow-to-debt of at least 4%.

The rating affirmation reflects Moody's belief that despite the
unlikely near-term prospect the company will be able to refinance
its outstanding holding company PIK notes and 2nd lien debt with
$315 million in operating company subordinated debt as was planned
back in September 2005 when Moody's downgraded the company's
ratings.  The company's equity sponsors have clearly demonstrated
their intention to place the additional financial leverage on the
operating company given the 1st lien credit agreement amendment
permitting the issuance of subordinated debt remains in place.

In addition, while the 2nd lien credit agreement does not permit
the issuance of subordinated debt and would have to be refinanced
with the proceeds of any such capital markets transaction, Moody's
believes that the company's credit metrics will not improve as
anticipated when the initial ratings were assigned in June 2005
due to:

   * weak sales in:

     -- roof drainage products in home retail centers,
     -- fabricated aluminum and steel roofing, and
     -- siding to rural contractors; and

   * depressed margins resulting from higher raw material and
     operating costs and a competitive pricing environment.

At this time, Moody's does not see any upward rating pressure.
However, the ratings could come under additional pressure if th