T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

            Thursday, February 21, 2008, Vol. 12, No. 44

                             Headlines

ACA CAPITAL: Counterparties Waive Rights and Claims Until April 23
ACCENTIA BIOPHARMA: Dec. 31 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $74.6 M.
ADAM AIRCRAFT: Files Ch. 7 Petition in Colorado and Cuts 800 Posts
ADVANCED LIVING: Hires Focus Management as Financial Advisor
AEGIS MORTGAGE: Wells Fargo Wants Equity Title's Suit Dismissed

AGILYSYS INC: Acquires Eatec Corporation for $23.2 Million Cash
AMERICAN HOME: Withdraws Request to Hire Deloitte as Tax Experts
AMERICAN HOME: Court Denies CB Richard as Real Estate Broker
AMERICAN SOIL: McKennon Wilson Expresses Going Concern Doubt
AMERICAN WENSHEN: Losses Cue Kabani to Raise Going Concern Doubt

ATLANTIC EXPRESS: S&P Junks Corp. Credit and Secured Debt Ratings
AVETA INC: S&P Puts 'CCC' Credit Rating Under Positive Creditwatch
BANC OF AMERICA: Stable Performance Cues Fitch to Hold Ratings
BENJAMIN ELLIS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
BEXAR COUNTY HOUSING: Moody's Affirms 'B1' Rating on Revenue Bonds

BLACKHAWK AUTOMOTIVE: Wants Court's OK to Sell Assets for $20.7MM
BLACKHAWK AUTOMOTIVE: Wants Plan Filing Deadline Moved to May 19
BUFFETS HOLDINGS: $385 Mil. DIP Facility Hearing Moved to Feb. 22
CHAMPION ENTERPRISES: Posts $6MM Net Loss in Quarter Ended Dec. 29
CHIQUITA BRANDS: Posts $26 Mil. Net Loss in Qtr. Ended December 31

COACH AMERICA: Profit Pressues Prompt S&P to Cut Rating to B-
CONGOLEUM CORP: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
CORNERSTONE-CAMERON: White Eagle Wins Bid for Apartments at $16MM
CORPORATE EXPRESS: S&P Puts 'BB-' Credit Rating Under Pos. Watch
CROSSFIRE ENERGY: Lender to Ask Alberta Court to Name Receiver

CRYOPORT INC: Posts $1.2M Net Loss in 3rd Qtr. Ended Dec. 31
DELPHI CORP: Hearing to Consider Bearings Biz Sale Set Today
DELPHI CORP: Wants to Strike Non-Conforming Cure Objections
DELPHI CORP: Cuts CEO Rodney O'Neal's Emergence Incentive to $1MM
DURA AUTOMOTIVE: Backstop Rights Deal with Pacificor LLC Expires

DURA AUTOMOTIVE: Wants Court to Approve Amended 2008 KMIP
ELITE PHARMA: Posts $2.8M Net Loss in 3rd Qtr. Ended Dec. 31
ESSENTIAL INNOVATION: Peterson Sullivan Raises Going Concern Doubt
EUROFRESH INC: Moody's Rating Unmoved by Deal to Refinance Debt
F.C.D.C. COAL: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

FIRST MAGNUS: Seeks Court's Approval of Settlement Pact with UBS
FIRST MAGNUS: Court Grants Allegra's Request for Deposition
FIRST MAGNUS: Court Orders WNS' Subpoena for Arizona Bank Quashed
FIRST NLC: Court Appoints Berger Singerman as Counsel
FORTUNOFF: May Pay Up to $3 Million Prepetition Delivery Charges

FORTUNOFF: El-Kam Realty and Century Road Demand Lease Payments
FREEPORT-MCMORAN: Moody's Lifts Ratings on Strong Earnings
FRONTLINE CAPITAL: Wants Plan Filing Deadline Moved to May 2
GE CAPITAL: Moody's Affirms B3 Rating on $5.944MM Class O Certs.
GE CAPITAL: Moody's Junks Ratings on Two Certificate Classes

GEN CON: Says Bankruptcy Won't Interrupt Operations and Events
GENER8XION ENTERTAINMENT: Farber Hass Raises Going Concern Doubt
GENERAL DATACOMM: Dec. 31 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $32.3 Mil.
G-I HOLDINGS: Court Approves Dewey & Lebeouf as Counsel
GS MORTGAGE: Moody's Chips Rating on $28.18MM Class G Certs. to B1

GS MORTGAGE: S&P Junks Two Certs. Ratings, Removes Neg. Watch
HDB LLC: Lenders Ask Court to Appoint Chapter 11 Trustee
HOLLEY PERFORMANCE: Taps Epiq as Claims and Noticing Agent
ICC WORLDWIDE: Holtz Rubenstein Expresses Going Concern Doubt
INTRAOP MEDICAL: Dec. 31 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $1.4M

INTREPID TECH: Posts $731T Net Loss in 2nd Qtr. Ended Dec. 31
IWT TESORO: Judge Glenn Sets March 17 as Claims Bar Date
KESSELRING HOLDING: Posts $1.3 Mil. Net Loss in Qtr. Ended Dec. 31
KIMBALL HILL: Gets Limited Access to Loan Facility Until March 14
KKR FINANCIAL: Gets Extension of SLN Maturity Date to March 3

KRONOS ADVANCED: Dec. 31 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $2M
LB COMMERCIAL: Moody's Cuts Ratings on $30.937 Mil. Certificates
LEVITT & SONS: Wachovia Says It Is Not Obligated to Release Homes
LEVITT AND SONS: SHR Bonita Wants Deed & Escrow Pact Approved
LILLIAN VERNON: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors

MARCAL PAPER: Settles Federal Environmental Claims with EPA
MBIA INC: Former CEO Returns to Lead Company Through Challenges
MERRILL LYNCH: Moody's Holds Low-B Ratings on Two Cert. Classes
MERRILL LYNCH: Moody's Holds B3 Rating on $3.513MM Class K Certs.
MOHEGAN TRIBAL: $1 Bil. Credit Facility Amendment Gets Lenders OK

MEDQUEST INC: $177MM Notes Redemption Cues S&P to Withdraw Ratings
M/I HOMES: S&P Slashes Preferred Stock Rating to CCC+ from B-
MORGAN STANLEY: S&P Affirms Low-B Ratings on Five Cert. Classes
NAISER ADVERTISING: Case Summary & 11 Largest Unsecured Creditors
NEW YORK RACING: Court Extends Exclusive Plan Filing Period

NASH FINCH: Seeks $18 Mil. in Damages from Roundy's Supermarkets
NOWAUTO GROUP: Dec. 31 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $584T
ORBIT PETROLEUM: Files for Chapter 11 Reorganization in New Mexico
PEOPLE'S CHOICE: Fitch Chips Ratings on 15 Certificate Classes
PLASTECH ENGINEERED: Johnson Controls Mulled on Acquiring Plastech

PLASTECH ENGINEERED: Taps Lazard Freres as Financial Advisor
PLASTECH ENGINEERED: To Hire Skadden Arps as Bankruptcy Counsel
POLAR MOLECULAR: Case Dismissal Hearing Slated for March 13
PROSPECT MEDICAL: Inks Forbearance Arrangements with Lenders
QUEBECOR WORLD: Quebec Court Extends CCAA Protection Until May 12

QUEBECOR WORLD: Joint Administrators Close British Printing Plant
QUEBECOR WORLD: Franklin Resources Holds 1,105 Sub. Voting Shares
QUEBECOR WORLD: New Pact with Clients to Yield $75 Mil. Annually
REBECCA CARTEE: Case Summary & Three Largest Unsecured Creditors
RED MILE: Posts $2.8M Net Loss in 3rd Quarter Ended Dec. 31

REMOTEMDX INC: Posts $2.3M Net Loss in 1st Qtr. Ended Dec. 31
RESIDENTIAL FUNDING: Fitch Junks Ratings on 22 Certificate Classes
RESMAE MORTGAGE: Fitch Cuts Ratings on $421.4 Million Certificates
ROUNDY'S SUPERMARKETS: Claims Nash Finch Violated APA Terms
SANMINA-SCI: Inks Assets Sale Agreement with Foxteq Holdings

SHARPER IMAGE: Files for Bankruptcy Protection
SHARPER IMAGE CORP: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
SITEL WORLDWIDE: Weak Profitability Cues S&P to Lower Rating to B
SOLERA HOLDINGS: S&P Lifts Rating on Improved Credit Metrics
SOTER 2007-GSC: S&P Slashes Notes Rating to B- from AAA

SPACEHAB INC: Buying 55,000 Series D Pref. Shares for $5.5 Million
SQUARED CDO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Six Note Classes to Ca
ST. JOE COMPANY: Mulls Slashing 780 Out of 980 Direct Positions
SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS: Miller Ellin Raises Going Concern Doubt
TEKNI-PLEX INC: Credit Amendment Cues S&P to Affirm 'CC' Rating

TITAN GLOBAL: Board OKs Split into Four Separate Public Companies
TYSON FOODS: Expects Business Success Despite Costs Challenges
UAL CORPORATION: Various Entities Disclose Stake Ownership
UNITED ENERGY: Posts $594T Net Loss in 3rd Qtr. Ended Dec. 31
UNITED SUBCONTRACTORS: Moody's Cuts Corporate Family Rating to B3

UPSNAP INC: Posts $80T Net Loss in 1st Quarter Ended Dec. 31
URSTADT BIDDLE: Secures $50 Mil. Unsec. Revolving Credit Facility
VICTOR PLASTICS: Committee Taps Kalina Wills as Bankruptcy Counsel
VICTOR PLASTICS: U.S. Trustee Appoints 5-Member Creditors Panel
WALTER INDUSTRIES: To Close 36 Jim Walter Homes Sales Centers

WESTSHORE GLASS: Files Schedules of Assets and Liabilities
WESTMORELAND COAL: Inks Deal to Refinance Roanoke Valley Project
WHOLE FOODS: Earns $39.1 Million in Quarter Ended January 20
WICKES FURNITURE: U.S. Trustee Appoints 7-Member Creditors Panel
WICKES FURNITURE: Taps Greenberg Traurig as Bankruptcy Counsel

WILLOW CREEK FUELS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
WORNICK COMPANY: Asks Court to Approve $35MM DIP Credit Facility
WORNICK COMPANY: Asks Court to Approve Asset Sale to Viren
ZIM CORPORATION: Earns $156T in Third Quarter Ended Dec. 31

* Fitch Says Equipment Lease Delinquencies Rise Slightly in 2007
* Real Estate Prices Drop to 1.5% in Dec., Moody's Report Shows  
* Moody's Sees Neg. Outlook for U.S. Gaming and Lodging Sectors
* Moody's Says Fin'l Guarantors' Credit Risks Might Affect Banks
* Moody's Says Failures in Auction Rate Markets May Press Ratings

* S&P Lowers Ratings on 125 Tranches from 18 U.S. Hybrid CDOs

*Chapter 11 Cases with Assets & Liabilities Below $1,000,000

                             *********

ACA CAPITAL: Counterparties Waive Rights and Claims Until April 23
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACA Capital Holdings Inc. entered into a third forbearance
agreement with its Structured Credit and other similarly situated
counterparties.  This agreement, which is of longer term than the
two preceding agreements, will remain effective through 6:00 p.m.,
New York City local time, on April 23, 2008.  

Under the agreement, the counterparties will continue to waive all
collateral posting requirements, termination rights and policy
claims relating to the rating of ACA Financial Guaranty
Corporation, ACA Capital's financial guaranty insurance
subsidiary, under their respective transaction documents including
any credit support annexes and similar agreements.

The extended forbearance period will permit the company and its
counterparties to continue their productive discussions to develop
a lasting solution for the company's capital and liquidity issues.

During this period, the company plans to work with its financial
advisor, The Blackstone Group, to further build upon the
significant progress achieved since early December 2007.  The
company seeks to finalize the terms of a solution by the end of
this extended forbearance period and to proceed to closing as soon
as practicable thereafter.

                       About ACA Capital

ACA Capital Holdings Inc. (NYSE: ACA) (OTC BB: ACAH.PK) --
http://www.aca.com/-- is a holding company that provides
financial guaranty insurance products to participants in the
global credit derivatives markets, structured finance capital
markets and municipal finance capital markets.  It also provides
asset management services to specific segments of the structured
finance capital markets.  The company participates in its target
markets both as a provider of credit protection through the sale
of financial guaranty insurance products, for risk-based revenues,
and as an asset manager, for fee-based revenues.  ACA Capital has
offices in New York, London, and Singapore.

ACA Capital, through ACA Financial Guaranty Corporation, provides
credit protection products.  ACA Financial insures the principal
and interest of bonds issued in the public finance market and
targets the low investment grade ("BBB-") to high non-investment
grade ("BB") portion of the public finance market.  Typically,
ACA Financial is paid one payment for insurance, up-front, based
on the total amount of principal and interest insured.  The
payments received are held in reserve and earn out over the life
of the related financial guaranty, nominally 30 years.  At
Sept. 30, 2007, ACA Financial had $7.0 billion of gross par
exposure in its public finance business.

                          *     *     *

ACA Capital's balance sheet as of Sept. 30, 2007, showed total
assets of $4.9 billion, total liabilities of $5.8 billion, and
minority interest of $9.5 million, resulting in total
stockholders' deficit of $883.3 million.


ACCENTIA BIOPHARMA: Dec. 31 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $74.6 M.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Accentia Biopharmaceuticals Inc.'s consolidated balance sheet at
Dec. 31, 2007, showed $37.8 million in total assets,
$107.5 million in total liabilities, and $4.9 million in non-
controlling interest in variable interest entities, resulting in a
$74.6 million total stockholders' deficit.

At Dec. 31, 2007, the company's consolidated balance sheet also
showed strained liquidity with $18.7 million in total current
assets available to pay $76.7 million in total current
liabilities.

Accentia's first quarter net loss, on a fully consolidated basis,
including Biovest International Inc., was $24.8 million, compared
to $30.6 million reported for the same three month period in
fiscal 2007.  Of this loss, $17.6 million, or approximately 71.0%
was the result of non-cash charges such as accretion of  
capitalized finance cost, derivative loss and loss on
extinguishment of debt.

On a fully consolidated basis, net sales for the three months
ended Dec. 31, 2007, were $4.3 million, compared with $5.9 million
for the same period ended Dec. 31, 2006.  This decrease was
primarily attributed to a decrease of $1.3 million in net sales in
the company's Specialty Pharmaceuticals segment primarily due to
the divestiture of its  Xodol and Histex product lines, the
discontinuance of its Respi-Tann G product line, product returns
and, to a lesser extent, a decrease in net sales of its Analytica
subsidiary.

Consolidated research and development costs were $3.8 million for
the first fiscal quarter, compared with $4.4 million for the same
fiscal quarter in 2007.  This 13.0% decrease was largely due to
the company's Biovest subsidiary reducing R&D expenses as its
clinical trial costs have declined considerably in advance of the
pending interim analysis of Phase 3 results for BiovaxID(TM).
Biovest expects to file for conditional approval for BiovaxID in
the U.S. and Europe, assuming positive results.  The Biovest
decrease in R&D expenses of $2.0 million was partially offset by
an increase of $1.4 million in the Phase 3 clinical trial expense
for SinuNase.

At Dec. 31, 2007, Accentia had approximately $629,518 of cash and
cash equivalents, and approximately $5.0 million in restricted
cash, of which $3.2 million was attributed to Biovest.  As
previously reported, Biovest secured an $8.5 million financing in
December.  Subsequent to December 31, Accentia received proceeds
from a private placement of approximately $8.7 million of
convertible preferred stock.  The company expects to have access
to additional sources of capital following the unblinding of the
SinuNase and BiovaxID Phase 3 clinical trials data, including
through potential corporate collaborations and licensing
agreements.

Full-text copies of the company's consolidated financial
statements for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2007, are available for
free at http://researcharchives.com/t/s?2842

                       Going Concern Doubt

Aidman, Piser & Company P.A., in Tampa, Florida, expressed
substantial doubt about Accentia Biopharmaceuticals Inc.'s ability
to continue as a going concern after auditing the company's
consolidated financial statements for the years ended Sept. 30,
2007, and 2006.  The auditing firm reported that the company
incurred cumulative net losses of approximately $164.1 million
during the three years ended Sept. 30, 2007, $57.8 million of
which was attributable to their 76% owned subsidiary, and, as of
that date, had a working capital deficiency of approximately
$53.1 million.

                About Accentia Biopharmaceuticals

Based in Tampa, Florida, Accentia BioPharmaceuticals Inc. (Nasdaq:
ABPI) -- http://www.accentia.net/-- is a vertically integrated  
biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and
commercialization of drug candidates that are in late-stage
clinical development and typically are based on active
pharmaceutical ingredients that have been previously approved by
the FDA for other indications.  The company's lead product
candidate is SinuNase(TM), a novel application and formulation of
a known therapeutic to treat chronic rhinosinusitis.

Additionally, the company has acquired the majority ownership
interest in Biovest International Inc. and a royalty interest in
Biovest's lead drug candidate, BiovaxID(TM) and any other biologic
products developed by Biovest.  The company also has a specialty
pharmaceutical business, which markets products focused on
respiratory disease and an analytical consulting business that
serves customers in the biopharmaceutical industry.


ADAM AIRCRAFT: Files Ch. 7 Petition in Colorado and Cuts 800 Posts
------------------------------------------------------------------
Adam Aircraft Inc. filed for chapter 7 liquidation with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado on Feb. 15, 2008,
Rocky Mountain News and Denver Business Journal relate, citing
court documents.

Adam Aircraft's 500 workers in Colorado and 300 in Utah will be
laid off while chairman and chief executive officer, John Wolf,
left his post effective as of the bankruptcy filing, Bizjournal
reports.

Rocky Mountain reveals the Debtor listed assets between $1 million
and $10 million, and debts between $50 million and $100 million in
a court filing.  According to the filing, the Debtor owes money to
almost a thousand creditors, Rocky Mountain adds.

                     Colorado Biz Suspended

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Feb. 13, 2008,
Adam Aircraft Inc. said on its Web site that it suspended
operations Monday at its facilities in Colorado.  Adam Aircraft
said the move was "difficult but necessary."

The measure, according to the company, was required due to its
inability to come to terms with their lender for funding necessary
to maintain business operations.  At that time, the company was
currently exploring all of its alternatives and will provide
further guidance when decisions are made.

                       Need for Financing

The TCR related on Jan. 25, 2008, that Adam Aircraft must secure
two financing transactions otherwise it would be forced to
liquidate, as stated in a letter by CEO John Wolf to stockholders.

Although the company had already secured $5.5 million in December
2007, it needed to obtain $30.5 million by the end of January.
According to the letter, the company must successfully complete
the $30.5 million transaction in order for the company to obtain
at least a $100 million equity financing led by Citibank sometime
in May 2008.

The Debtor had tried to lure investors by offering 49.9% equity
interest in a newly formed subsidiary in exchange for funding
needed in January.

                       About Adam Aircraft

Denver, Colorado-based Adam Aircraft Inc., aka Adam Aircraft
Industries -- http://www.adamaircraft.com/-- designs and  
manufactures advanced aircraft for civil and government markets.  
The A500 twin-engine piston aircraft has been Type Certified by
the FAA, and the A700, which is currently undergoing flight test
and development.


ADVANCED LIVING: Hires Focus Management as Financial Advisor
------------------------------------------------------------
Focus Management Group has been appointed Financial Advisor to
Advanced Living Technologies, Inc. under an Order entered by the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas,
San Antonio Division effective Jan. 9, 2008.  

Advanced Living Technologies Inc. is a not for profit owner of
nursing homes and rehabilitation centers.  ALT owns and operates
six facilities throughout southeast Texas.  ALT filed a petition
for voluntary reorganization under Chapter 11 in the Western
District of Texas United States Bankruptcy Court on Jan. 9, 2008.  

Focus Management Group is providing ALT with advisory services in
the planning of its Chapter 11 filing and is assisting the Company
in the preparation of its Plan of Reorganization and the internal
administration of its Chapter 11 case.    

The Focus restructuring and bankruptcy advisory team is led by
James Hopwood, a managing director of Focus Management Group with
over 20 years of experience supporting under-performing businesses
in diverse industries including healthcare.

Mr. Hopwood is a restructuring specialist with extensive
leadership experience in Chapter 11 reorganizations, financial
restructuring and operational turnarounds in the healthcare
industry.  He can be reached at (773) 724-2082.

                      About Advanced Living

Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Advanced Living Technologies,
Inc., owns and operates nursing homes.  The company filed for
Chapter 11 protection on January 9, 2008 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case.
No.08-50040).  Patricia Baron Tomasco, Esq., at Brown McCarroll,
L.L.P., represents the Debtor.  When the company filed for
protection from its creditors, it listed between $1 million and
$10 million in assets and debts.


AEGIS MORTGAGE: Wells Fargo Wants Equity Title's Suit Dismissed
---------------------------------------------------------------
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., formerly known as Wells Fargo Home
Mortgage Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to dismiss a complaint filed by Equity Title of Nevada,
in its entirety.

Karen C. Bifferato, Esq., at Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP, in
Wilmington, Delaware, contends that the Court cannot enter a
declaratory judgment with respect to the disbursements made by
Equity Title to Wells Fargo since the bank did not receive any
property from Aegis Mortgage Corporation or its debtor-affiliates.

                      Equity Title Lawsuit

Equity Title sued Aegis Wholesale Corporation in September 2007 to
recover certain payments Equity Title made before the Debtors
filed for bankruptcy.

Equity Title acted as agent for a sale transaction between Bernard
and Gloria Rubins, and Joseph and Evelyn Reyeses in Nevada.  The
Reyeses intended to buy from the Rubinses certain real estate
property.

Aegis Wholesale acted as lender in the transaction and established
a $199,000 loan.  The Debtor allegedly provided the Reyeses a
check for $199,954 to fund the loan.

At the time of the transaction, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
and Community One Federal Credit Union maintained secured loans
with respect to the property, which amount to $58,481 and
$94,287.   

Pursuant to the transaction, a promissory note naming the Debtor
as payee, and a Deed of Trust with the Debtor as beneficiary,
were executed and recorded.

On August 1, 2007, Equity Title deposited the funding check into
its trust account so that it could disburse the funds.  The loan
was used to pay the balances with Wells Fargo and Community One,
and to pay certain closing costs.  The Rubinses were paid the
balance of the funds, which amounts to $20,681.

Equity Title said it wasn't aware at that time that the Debtor has
ceased all mortgage activity, closed its business and terminated
its employees.

After Equity Title disbursed the loan as it was required to do
under the transaction, the funding check was returned for
insufficient funds.  Prior to the bankruptcy filing, the funding
check was dishonored by the Debtor's bank.  Consequently, the Loan
was never funded by the Debtor.

The Debtor refused Equity Title's requests to fund the loan or
acknowledge that it does not own the loan due to its failure to
provide funding.  Wells Fargo and Community One, Equity Title
says, refused to return the amounts paid to them pursuant to the
transaction despite their knowledge that the loan was not funded
by the Debtor.

Aegis Wholesale has argued that the loan is a property of its
bankruptcy estate despite the fact that there was no consideration
for the loan.

In its complaint, Equity Title asked the Court to declare that the
loan and its proceeds are not property of Aegis Wholesale's
estate, and that the loan and the transaction are invalid because
the Debtor failed to provide consideration for the loan.

                    Wells Fargo's Arguments

"By Equity Title's own allegations, the funds used to make the
disbursements came from Equity Title and not the Debtor.  Because
the money paid to Wells Fargo did not come from the Debtor, the
disbursements cannot be considered property of the Debtor, or
consequently, its estate," Ms. Bifferato points out.  She adds
that the Court does not have jurisdiction over non-estate
property and thus, cannot enter a declaratory judgment.

"[Equity Title] does not have a standing to challenge or rescind
the loan or the [sale transaction].  It has failed to allege any
facts that suggest it was a contracting party to either the loan
or the transaction," Ms. Bifferato says.  She points out that
Equity Title can only ask for rescission of the loan and the
transaction if the Court finds that it does not have any rights
or interests in the loan.

"In this case, it appears that [Equity Title] ended up simply
loaning money to the Debtor.  This makes [Equity Title] a creditor
of the Debtor, not a contractual party to the loan or to the
transaction," Ms. Bifferato argues.

According to Ms. Bifferato, the proper remedy is monetary damages
to Equity Title and not rescission since the loan and the
transaction have been substantially performed.

"Similarly, [Equity Title] cannot rescind the loan and the
transaction if third party rights have vested," Ms. Bifferato  
points out, adding that the seller's debt to Wells Fargo was paid
as part of the sale transaction.

"Therefore, to the extent that Wells Fargo may be considered a
beneficiary of the loan or the transaction, the [bank's] rights
have vested," Ms. Bifferato argues. "Once vesting has occurred,
the original parties to the contract are both bound to perform
the contract, and any effort by a party to the contract to
rescind or modify [it] is void."

Rescission based on mutual mistake should not be permitted,
Ms. Bifferato asserts, saying that Equity Title assumed the risk
that the loan would not actually be funded by the Debtor by
making disbursements and recording the deed of trust and
promissory note before the funding check cleared.

"Equity Title has failed to allege any facts in the complaint
that address mistake by all parties to the transaction so that it
should be rescinded," Ms. Bifferato notes.  "Wells Fargo did not
care or know what the source was or supposed to be of the  
disbursements that were made to the bank in the transaction."

              Aegis Disputes Equity Title Allegations

In a separate filing, Aegis Mortgage Corporation asks the Court to
issue a decision avoiding any interest Equity Title may have in
the mortgage loan.

James E. O'Neill, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, in
Wilmington, Delaware, argues that any interest of Equity Title
would be subject to:

     (a) a creditor that extends credit to the debtor at the time
         of the commencement of the case, and that obtains a
         judicial lien on all property, which a creditor on a
         simple contract could have obtained the judicial lien;
         and

     (b) a creditor that extends credit to the debtor at the time
         of the commencement of the case, and obtains an
         execution against the debtor that is returned
         unsatisfied at that time, whether or not the creditor
         exists.

Mr. O'Neill further argues that the complaint failed to state
facts sufficient to constitute a claim against Aegis Mortgage.  
He adds that Equity Title's claims are barred by the doctrine of
set-off of claims Aegis Mortgage held against Equity Title.

            Equity Title Refutes Debtor's Counterclaim

Equity Title says the mortgage loan is not property of the
Debtors' estates.  The Debtors, it notes, have mere legal title to
the Loan, but Equity Title has equitable title to the Loan.

Equity asks the Court to dismiss the Debtors' counterclaim with
prejudice.

                       About Aegis Mortgage

Headquartered in Houston, Texas, Aegis Mortgage Corporation --
http://www.aegismtg.com/-- offers a variety of mortgage loan
products to brokers through its subsidiaries.

The company together with 10 affiliates filed for chapter 11
protection on Aug. 13, 2007 (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 07-11119)
Curtis A. Hehn, Esq., James E. O'Neill, Esq., Laura Davis Jones,
Esq., and Timothy P. Cairns, Esq., at Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, &
Jones, L.L.P., serve as counsel to the Debtors.  The Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors is represented by Landis Rath &
Cobb LLP.  In schedules filed with the Court, Aegis disclosed
total assets of $138,265,342 and total debts of $4,125,470.  The
Debtors' exclusive period to file a plan of reorganization expires
on April 9, 2008.

(Aegis Bankruptcy News, Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc.,
http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).


AGILYSYS INC: Acquires Eatec Corporation for $23.2 Million Cash
---------------------------------------------------------------
Agilysys Inc. acquired Eatec Corporation for a purchase price of
$23.2 million, net of cash.  The acquisition will be funded with
the company's cash on hand.  
    
Eatec's software, EatecNetX, is a recognized, open architecture-
based, inventory and procurement management system.  It provides
customers with the data and information necessary to increase
sales, reduce product costs, improve back-office productivity and
increase profitability.  Eatec customers include restaurants,
hotels, stadiums and entertainment venues in North America and
around the world well as many public service institutions.

EatecNetX's core functions include purchasing, inventory, recipe,
forecasting, production and sales analysis.  Additionally, the
solution offers catering, restaurant, concessions, manufacturing,
retail/merchandising and airline catering modules in one
integrated solution.

"This acquisition further enhances our position as a leading
inventory and procurement solution provider to the hospitality and
foodservice markets," Arthur Rhein, chairman, president and chief
executive officer of Agilysys, said.  "Similar to our previous
acquisitions of Visual One Systems and InfoGenesis, the Eatec
acquisition complements and expands our offerings, allowing us to
better serve our customers."

In addition to being a stand-alone software application, EatecNetX
will be interfaced with Agilysys' point-of-sale offerings to
create a complete end-to- end solution for customers in the
foodservice industry.

Agilysys hospitality solution offerings are among the most
comprehensive in the market, with solutions to cover the
hospitality industry's information technology needs. Agilysys
hospitality solutions include property management, inventory
procurement, point-of-sale, golf management, club management,
condo accounting, spa, sales and catering, dining reservations,
business analytics and document management.

                     About Eatec Corporation

Eatec Corporation -- http://www.eatec.com/-- is a privately held  
developer and marketer of inventory and procurement software.
with U.S. headquarters in Emeryville, California.

                        About Agilysys Inc.

Based in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, Agilysys Inc. (Nasdaq: AGYS) --
http://www.agilysys.com/-- is one of the distributors and       
resellers of enterprise computer technology solutions.  The
company is delivering complex server and storage hardware,
software and services to resellers, large and medium-sized
corporate customers, well as public-sector clients across a
diverse set of industries.  In addition, the company provides
customer-centric software applications and services focused on the
retail and hospitality markets.  Agilysys has sales offices
throughout the United States and Canada.

                          *     *     *

Standard and Poor's placed Agilysys Inc.'s long-term foreign and
local issuer credit ratings at "BB-" in October 2004.  The ratings
still hold to date.


AMERICAN HOME: Withdraws Request to Hire Deloitte as Tax Experts
----------------------------------------------------------------
American Home Mortgage Investment Corp. has withdrawn its request
before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, to
employ Deloitte Tax LLP as their tax experts.  The Debtors did not
state the basis of the withdrawal

Kelly Beaudin Stapleton, United States Trustee for Region 3, had
objected to the Application saying that, among other things,
Deloitte Tax is not a "disinterested person" because it has an
interest materially adverse to both the interests of the Debtors'
bankruptcy estates and a class of their equity security holders
by reason of Deloitte & Touche LLP's prepetition connections with
the Debtors.

Based in Melville, New York, American Home Mortgage Investment
Corp. (NYSE: AHM) -- http://www.americanhm.com/-- is a mortgage   
real estate investment trust engaged in the business of investing
in mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans resulting from
the securitization of residential mortgage loans originated and
serviced by its subsidiaries.

American Home Mortgage and seven affiliates filed for
chapter 11 protection on Aug. 6, 2007 (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos.
07-11047 through 07-11054).  James L. Patton, Jr., Esq., Joel A.
Waite, Esq., and Pauline K. Morgan, Esq. at Young, Conaway,
Stargatt & Taylor LLP, represent the Debtors.  Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions LLC acts as the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.  The
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors selected Hahn & Hessen
LLP as its counsel.  As of March 31, 2007, American Home
Mortgage's balance sheet showed total assets of $20,553,935,000,
total liabilities of $19,330,191,000.  The Debtors' exclusive
period to file a plan expires on March 3, 2008.  (American Home
Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 26, Bankruptcy Creditors' Service,
Inc., http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).


AMERICAN HOME: Court Denies CB Richard as Real Estate Broker
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware denied
American Home Mortgage Investment Corp.'s request to employ
CB Richard Ellis Inc., as real estate broker.

Kelly Beaudin Stapleton, United States Trustee for Region 3,
previously questioned why, as a threshold matter, the Debtors are
seeking to employ CB Richard Ellis to market a property, which is
not property of the bankruptcy estates.

Based in Melville, New York, American Home Mortgage Investment
Corp. (NYSE: AHM) -- http://www.americanhm.com/-- is a mortgage   
real estate investment trust engaged in the business of investing
in mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans resulting from
the securitization of residential mortgage loans originated and
serviced by its subsidiaries.

American Home Mortgage and seven affiliates filed for
chapter 11 protection on Aug. 6, 2007 (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos.
07-11047 through 07-11054).  James L. Patton, Jr., Esq., Joel A.
Waite, Esq., and Pauline K. Morgan, Esq. at Young, Conaway,
Stargatt & Taylor LLP, represent the Debtors.  Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions LLC acts as the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.  The
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors selected Hahn & Hessen
LLP as its counsel.  As of March 31, 2007, American Home
Mortgage's balance sheet showed total assets of $20,553,935,000,
total liabilities of $19,330,191,000.  The Debtors' exclusive
period to file a plan expires on March 3, 2008.  (American Home
Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 26, Bankruptcy Creditors' Service,
Inc., http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).


AMERICAN SOIL: McKennon Wilson Expresses Going Concern Doubt
------------------------------------------------------------
McKennon Wilson & Morgan LLP in Ervine, Calif., raised substantial
doubt about the ability of American Soil Technologies Inc., to
continue as a going concern after it audited the company's
financial statements for the year ended Sept. 30, 2007.  The
auditing firm stated that the company has incurred losses in
recent history, and has significant working capital and
accumulated deficits.

The company posted a net loss of $3,112,030 on total revenues of
$764,591 for the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2007, as compared
with a net loss of $3,203,173 on total revenues of $586,003 in the
year ended Dec. 31, 2006.

At Sept. 30, 2007, the company's balance sheet showed $3,942,044
in total assets and $4,424,499 in total liabilities, resulting in
$482,455 stockholders' deficit.  

The company's consolidated balance sheet at Sept. 30, 2007, also
showed strained liquidity with $378,904 in total current assets
available to pay $2,672,426 in total current liabilities.

A full-text copy of the company's 2007 annual report is available
for free at: http://ResearchArchives.com/t/s?282e

                       About American Soil

Based in Pacoima, California, American Soil Technologies Inc.
(SOYLE.OB) -- http://www.americansoiltech.com-- develops,  
manufactures, and markets polymer soil amendments to the
agricultural, turf, and horticulture industries in North America.
It manufactures three primary products: Agriblend, a soil
amendment developed for agriculture; Soil Medic, a slow release
liquid fertilizer; and Nutrimoist, developed for homes, parks,
golf courses, and other turf related applications.  The company
was founded in 1993.


AMERICAN WENSHEN: Losses Cue Kabani to Raise Going Concern Doubt
----------------------------------------------------------------
Kabani & Company, Inc., raised substantial doubt about the ability
of American Wenshen Steel Group, Inc., to continue as a going
concern after it audited the company's financial statements for
the year ended Sept. 30, 2007.  The auditor pointed to the
company's significant operating losses and insufficient capital  

The company posted a net loss of $595,290 on net sales of
$1,162,555 for the year ended Sept. 30, 2007, as compared with a
net loss of $117,544 on net sales of $93,707 in the prior year.

At Sept. 30, 2007, the company's balance sheet showed $5,271,804
in total assets, $532,997 in total liabilities and $4,738,807
stockholders' equity.  

A full-text copy of the company's 2007 annual report is available
for free at: http://ResearchArchives.com/t/s?282c  

                     About American Wenshen

American Wenshen Steel Group, Inc. (OTC BB: AWSH.OB), through its
subsidiary, Chaoyang Liaogang Special Steel Co., Ltd.,
manufactures tungsten carbide steel, stainless steel, and die
steel in the People's Republic of China.  Its tungsten carbide
steel is used for tools, dies, and precision measuring
instruments, as well as gears and bearings.  The company produces
stainless steel primarily for the cookware and tableware industry.  
The company was founded in 2004 and is based in New York City.


ATLANTIC EXPRESS: S&P Junks Corp. Credit and Secured Debt Ratings
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its long-term corporate
credit rating and senior secured debt ratings on Atlantic Express
Transportation Corp. to 'CCC+' from 'B-' and placed the ratings on
CreditWatch with negative implications.
      
"The rating actions and CreditWatch placement reflect
worse-than-expected operating performance, a deteriorating
financial profile, and increasing liquidity constraints," said
Standard & Poor's credit analyst Funmi Afonja.  "The CreditWatch
also reflects our expectations of continued earnings and cash flow
pressures due to rising fuel prices at a time when the company
does not hedge for its fuel cost, and higher labor costs trends
that are likely to continue over the next 6 to 12 months."
     
Atlantic Express is one of the larger providers of school bus
transportation in the U.S. and the leading provider in New York
City.  School bus services account for about 88% of revenues.  The
company also provides paratransit services for disabled
passengers, and other services, including express commuter lines
and tour buses.
     
Atlantic Express's liquidity is tightly constrained and may not be
adequate to meet debt service requirements over the next year.  At
Dec. 31, 2007, the company had $1.2 million of cash, $10.5 million
available under its $35 million revolving credit facility, and
modest availability under its $10 million letter-of-credit
facility.  The revolving credit facility and the LOC facility both
expire in 2011.  The credit facility has a financial covenant
requirement of minimum last-12-months EBITDA of $26 million, which
will only be tested if excess availability falls below a certain
threshold.  Under the newest covenant amendment which expires on
Feb. 19, 2009, excess availability at Dec. 31, 2007, was above the
threshold.  However, the senior lender recently increased
borrowing base reserves for the company's interest rate swap
agreements, further exacerbating liquidity constraints as the
company approaches its peak borrowing requirement during the
fiscal (Sept. 30, 2008) quarter.  A continuation of or increase in
these reserves would have a significant adverse effect on the
company's liquidity over the next several months.
     
S&P will assess the company's operating prospects and liquidity in
resolving the CreditWatch.  S&P could lower ratings further if
liquidity constraints increase.


AVETA INC: S&P Puts 'CCC' Credit Rating Under Positive Creditwatch
------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services placed its 'CCC' counterparty
credit rating on Aveta Inc. on CreditWatch with positive
implications.
      
"The rating was placed on CreditWatch positive in connection with
improved financial performance that is likely to result in better
earnings quality and enhanced financial flexibility," said
Standard & Poor's credit analyst Joseph Marinucci.
     
For most of 2007, Aveta focused strongly on key remediation
initiatives that included new senior executives, network
recontracting, and buildup of medical management infrastructure.  
The 'CCC' rating on Aveta still best reflects the ongoing
uncertainty about the company's credit profile.
     
The rating could be raised by one or two notches in second-quarter
2008 if year-end 2007 results were to be in line with earnings and
cash flow trends that have emerged throughout the second-half of
2007.  S&P also expect Aveta to be compliant with all financial
covenants for the first-quarter 2008 filing period.
     
S&P intend to meet with Aveta's management soon to review year-end
2007 financial results and further discuss its prospective capital
and strategic plans.  Following the review, the ratings could be
raised by as a much as two notches with a stable or positive
outlook.


BANC OF AMERICA: Stable Performance Cues Fitch to Hold Ratings
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings affirmed Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.'s
commercial mortgage pass-through certificates, series 2001-1, as:

  -- $462.6 million class A-2 at 'AAA';
  -- $43.8 million class A-2F at 'AAA';
  -- Interest-only class X at 'AAA';
  -- $35.6 million class B at 'AAA';
  -- $21.3 million class C at 'AAA';
  -- $19 million class D at 'AAA';
  -- $9.5 million class E at 'AAA';
  -- $9.5 million class F at 'AAA';
  -- $19 million class G at 'AA';
  -- $14.2 million class H at 'A-';
  -- $13.3 million class J at 'BBB';
  -- $23.5 million class K at 'BB';
  -- $2.1 million class L at 'BB-';
  -- $5.5 million class M at 'B+';
  -- $6.8 million class N at 'B-/DR1';
  -- $5.6 million class O at 'C/DR6'.

Class A-1 has been paid in full.

The affirmations are due to the stable performance of the
transaction since Fitch's last rating action.  As of the January
2008 distribution date, the pool's aggregate balance has decreased
27.1% to $691.2 million from $948.1 million at issuance.  Thirty-
eight loans (36.2%) have defeased since issuance.

Fitch has designated 22 loans (17.1%) as Fitch Loans of Concern.  
These include the three specially serviced assets (2.6%) and four
of the top ten loans in the transaction, as well as loans with low
cash flow and occupancy.

The largest Fitch Loan of Concern, which is the second largest
loan (2.4%) in the pool, is an office property in Phoenix,
Arizona, which has been performing poorly since 2003 due to
occupancy issues and a competitive market.  The loan remains
current, and occupancy has increased to 88% as of June 2007 from
82% at year-end 2006.

The second largest Loan of Concern (2.2%) is an office property
Bellevue, Washington which has experienced a decline in cash flows
due to fluctuations in occupancy.  Occupancy as of September 2007
was 93% with a debt-service coverage ratio of 0.98 times.

The two largest specially serviced assets (2.2%) are real-estate
owned multi-family properties in Columbia, Missouri.  The
properties were transferred to special servicing due to monetary
default.

The third largest specially serviced asset (0.4%) is an REO office
property in Greenville, South Carolina.  The special servicer is
working to stabilize the property before marketing the property.

Fitch expected losses are anticipated to impact class O.


BENJAMIN ELLIS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-------------------------------------------------
Debtors: Benjamin Joseph Ellis
         Christine T.D. Ellis
         553 North Kimberlee Way
         Chandler, AZ 85225

Bankruptcy Case No.: 08-01521

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2008

Court: District of Arizona (Phoenix)

Debtors' Counsel: Gary V. Ringer, Esq.
                  7303 West Boston Street
                  Chandler, AZ 85226
                  Tel: (480) 705-7550
                  Fax: (480) 705-7503
                  garyvringler@earthlink.net

Estimated Assets: $1 Million to $10 Million

Estimated Debts:  $10 Million to $50 Million

The Debtors do not file a list of their 20 largest unsecured
creditors.


BEXAR COUNTY HOUSING: Moody's Affirms 'B1' Rating on Revenue Bonds
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the ratings on Bexar County
Housing Finance Corporation Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds
(American Opportunity for Housing - Colinas LLC Project) at Ba1
for Series 2001A and at B1 for Series 2001C.  The affirmations are
reflective of debt service coverage levels in 2006 that are
in-line with the benchmarks for the current rating categories.  
The outlook on both Series is stable due to improved financial
performance in 2007, balanced with weak occupancy at Las Colinas.

The bonds are secured by the revenues from three cross
collateralized properties, Las Colinas Apartments, Huebner Oaks
Apartments and Perrin Crest Apartments, as well as by funds and
investments pledged to the trustee under the indenture as security
for the bonds.  Las Colinas is a 232-unit garden style apartment
complex built in 1978, composed of 30 two-story buildings and is
located approximately 20 miles north west of the San Antonio
central business district.  Huebner Oaks is a 344-unit garden
style apartment complex built in 1984, composed of 23 two-story
buildings and is located approximately 12 miles north west of the
San Antonio central business district.  Perrin Crest is a 200-unit
garden style apartment complex built in 1985, composed of 13 two-
story buildings and is located approximately 12 miles north east
of the San Antonio central business district.

Legal Security: The bonds are limited obligations payable solely
from the revenues, receipts and security pledged in the Trust
Indenture.

Credit Strengths

  -- Debt service reserves are fully funded as of 12/17/2007.
  -- Excess cash in the surplus fund of $319,895 as of 12/17/2007.
  -- Interim financial statements for 2007 indicate improved debt
     service coverage.

Credit Challenges

  -- Weighted occupancy for the three projects is 90.6% in
     February 2008.

  -- Debt service coverage declined to 1.18x for Series 2001A
and          
     1.01x for 2001C in 2006; interim financial statements
     indicate improvement in 2007.

Recent Developments/Results:

Debt service coverage ratios, derived from 2006 audited financial
statements, are thin, but appropriate for the current rating
categories, at 1.18 for 2001A and 1.01for 2001C.  Weighted average
monthly occupancy averaged 91% in 2007, with the weakness being
relatively evenly distributed amount the three properties.   
February 2008 weighted average occupancy is 90.6%, with Las
Colinas the weakest at 86%.  Management credits the low occupancy
to recent move-outs of students due to a semester change at a
nearby university.  The less than optimum occupancy is balanced by
improved debt service coverage levels for 2007 - 1.32 for seniors
and 1.13 subs.  However, typically DSCR's for audited statements
are lower than those from interim statements.

Torto Wheaton Research forecasts rent growth of 2.3% in 2008 and
2.0% in 2009 for the Huebener Oaks' and Las Colinas' submarket.  
Occupancy in the submarket is forecasted to decline from 95.2% in
2007 to 94% in 2008.  Perrin Crest's submarket is forecasted to
under perform with 0.5% rent growth in 2008 and 1.3% in 2009.  
Occupancy is forecasted to decline to 92.2% in 2008.

What could change the rating - Up

  -- Stable weighted average occupancy, improved debt service
     coverage and a fully funded debt service funds.

What could change the rating - Down

  -- Declines in debt service coverage levels; or weakened
     occupancy; or the tapping of debt service reserves.

Outlook

The outlook for the bonds is stable as weakened occupancy is
balanced by improved financial performance in 2007.


BLACKHAWK AUTOMOTIVE: Wants Court's OK to Sell Assets for $20.7MM
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Blackhawk Automotive Plastics Inc. and its debtor-affiliates ask
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
Ohio for permission to sell substantially all of their assets to
Flex-N-Gate LLC for $20,768,000,under an asset purchase agreement.

Specifically, the Debtors are selling their operating assets,
including equipment, inventory and certain leasehold rights,
located at 800 Pennsylvania Avenue in Salem, Ohio, and at 4219
U.S. Rt. 42 in Mason, Ohio.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Dec. 18, 2007,
the Court approved the bidding procedure proposed by the Debtors
for the public sale of their assets.

                           Sale Protocol

Qualified bidders must deliver their offers no later than 5:00
p.m., on Feb. 29, 2008, at:

   W.Y. Campbell & Company,
   c/o Ty T. Clutterbuck
   1 Woodward Avenue, 26th Floor
   Detroit, MI 48226

An auction will take place March 3, 2008, at 11:00 a.m., at the
offices of Honigman, Miller, Schwartz & Cohn LLP in Detroit,
Michigan.  During the auction, qualified bidders may submit bids
in increments of at least $100,000.

A sale hearing has been set on March 5, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., to
consider approval of the Debtors' request.

                     About Blawkhawk Automotive

Salem, Ohio-based Blackhawk Automotive Plastics Inc., formerly
Warren Molded/Custom Plastics, manufactures injection molded
plastic products and motor vehicle parts and accessories.  BAP's
customers include General Motors, Delphi, Lear, Chrysler, Honda,
Navistar, and Visteon.  BAP employs about 1,574 workers
domestically, and generated $136 million in sales in 2006.

BAP owns Canadian subsidiary, Blackhawk Automotive Plastics Ltd.
which operated a manufacturing facility in Ontario until Johnson
Controls Inc. bought BAP Canada's assets in May 2005.  BAP
Canada's remaining assets consist primarily of net operating loss
carryforwards for Canadian tax purposes.  The NOLs had a book
value of about $8.2 million as of December 2005.  BAP also owns a
plant in Upper Sandusky, Ohio, which ceased operations in 2006.

The company filed for chapter 11 protection on Oct. 22, 2007
(Bankr. N.D. Ohio, Case No. 07-42671).  Its parent company, Tier e
Automotive Group Inc., filed a separate chapter 11 petition on the
same day (Bankr. N.D. Ohio, Case No. 07-42673).

Tier e acquired BAP from Worthington Industries Inc. in 1999.
Tier e also owns 49% stake in Nescor Holdings Inc., a holding
company for Nescor Plastics Corporation, also an automotive
plastics supplier.

William I. Kohn, Esq., David M. Neumann, Esq., Stuart A. Laven,
Jr., Esq., at Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP,
represent the Debtors in their restructuring efforts.  Donlin
Recano & Company Inc. provides the Debtors with claims, noticing,
balloting and distribution services.  The Debtors' schedules
disclosed total assets of $58,665,229 and total liabilities of
$51,244,592.  As of bankruptcy filing, BAP's aggregate debt to its
senior facility lenders was about $33 million.


BLACKHAWK AUTOMOTIVE: Wants Plan Filing Deadline Moved to May 19
----------------------------------------------------------------
Blackhawk Automotive Plastics Inc. and its debtor-affiliates ask
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
Ohio to further extend their exclusive period to file a Chapter 11
plan until May 19, 2008.

The Debtors also ask the Court to further extend their exclusive
period to solicit acceptances of that plan until July 18, 2008.

William E. Schonberg, Esq., at Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan &
Aronoff LLP in Cleveland, Ohio, says that the Debtors are in the
midst of the sale process and the termination of the exclusivity
before March 14 deadline to consummate a sale may unduly prejudice
their creditors.

The sale is part of the Debtors' postpetition financing agreement
with certain of their lenders, Mr. Schonberg says.

The Debtors' exclusive right to file a plan expired on Feb. 19,
2008.

                     About Blawkhawk Automotive

Salem, Ohio-based Blackhawk Automotive Plastics Inc., formerly
Warren Molded/Custom Plastics, manufactures injection molded
plastic products and motor vehicle parts and accessories.  BAP's
customers include General Motors, Delphi, Lear, Chrysler, Honda,
Navistar, and Visteon.  BAP employs about 1,574 workers
domestically, and generated $136 million in sales in 2006.

BAP owns Canadian subsidiary, Blackhawk Automotive Plastics Ltd.
which operated a manufacturing facility in Ontario until Johnson
Controls Inc. bought BAP Canada's assets in May 2005.  BAP
Canada's remaining assets consist primarily of net operating loss
carryforwards for Canadian tax purposes.  The NOLs had a book
value of about $8.2 million as of December 2005.  BAP also owns a
plant in Upper Sandusky, Ohio, which ceased operations in 2006.

The company filed for chapter 11 protection on Oct. 22, 2007
(Bankr. N.D. Ohio, Case No. 07-42671).  Its parent company, Tier e
Automotive Group Inc., filed a separate chapter 11 petition on the
same day (Bankr. N.D. Ohio, Case No. 07-42673).

Tier e acquired BAP from Worthington Industries Inc. in 1999.
Tier e also owns 49% stake in Nescor Holdings Inc., a holding
company for Nescor Plastics Corporation, also an automotive
plastics supplier.

William I. Kohn, Esq., David M. Neumann, Esq., Stuart A. Laven,
Jr., Esq., at Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP,
represent the Debtors in their restructuring efforts.  Donlin
Recano & Company Inc. provides the Debtors with claims, noticing,
balloting and distribution services.  The Debtors' schedules
disclosed total assets of $58,665,229 and total liabilities of
$51,244,592.  As of bankruptcy filing, BAP's aggregate debt to its
senior facility lenders was about $33 million.


BUFFETS HOLDINGS: $385 Mil. DIP Facility Hearing Moved to Feb. 22
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Buffets Holdings Inc. and its debtor-affiliates agreed with the  
request filed by the Official Committee of Unsecured creditors to
postpone the hearing on their motion to incur $385,000,000 in
postpetition financing.

The Committee said it needed additional time to analyze the DIP
Facility and its impact on the Debtors' restructuring and
creditors, reports Bloomberg News.

The Hon. Mary F. Walrath of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware continued the hearing to consider final
approval of the DIP Facility to Feb. 22, 2008.

                      More Parties Objects

(a) WP East End

The Debtors are parties to a certain lease agreement with WP East
End Associates LP's predecessor-in-interest for the lease of
about 10,000 square feet of space located in the East End
Shopping Center in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.

Same as with the other objecting landlords, WP East objects to
the provision in the Debtors' request to obtain postpetition
financing that would allow the DIP lenders to obtain a de facto
assignment of lease agreements in an event of default.

Jason W. Staib, Esq., at Blank Rome LLP, in Wilmington, Delaware,
contends that all transfers of WP East's Lease Agreement must be
subjected to a further hearing where any proposed assignee would
be required to meet the strict terms and conditions of Section
365 of the Bankruptcy Code, including providing the Landlord with
adequate assurance of future performance.

Mr. Staib tells the Court that it should not grant any relief
that allows the DIP Lenders to use a "drop dead" provision upon
the the occurrence of a default under Section 362 to vitiate the
Landlord's rights under Section 365.  He says automatic relief
from the stay under Section 362 would allow the DIP Lenders under
the guise of Section 364 financing to void the Landlord's rights
under Section 365.  He argues that statutory construction of the
Bankruptcy Code requires the Court to give meaning to both
Sections.

Accordingly, WP East asks the Court to modify the final order to
be entered with respect to the Debtor's request to obtain
postpetition financing.

(b) HSBC

HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Indenture Trustee of
$300,000 Principal Amount of 12-1/2% Senior notes due 2014, asks
the Court to deny the Debtors' request.

HSBC says the DIP Facility is not favorable to the Debtors and
their creditors.

HSBC argues that the DIP Facility is structured more to fix
apparent collateral problems of prepetition senior lenders.  The
$300,000,000 roll-up is inappropriate as it will only enhance the
position of prepetition lenders to the detriment of unsecured
creditors.
  
Pursuant to the roll-up, $300,000,000 of the $385,000,000 will be
used to repay nearly half of Prepetition Lenders' claims.  HSBC
notes that the Debtors have failed to establish that the proposed
roll-up is necessary.

(c) Committee

On behalf of the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Laura
Davis Jones, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, in
Wilmington, Delaware, contends that:

   -- the roll-up of the prepetition financing and the cross-
      collateralization of debt is inappropriate as the structure
      of the DIP Facility is solely for the benefit of the
      Lenders;

   -- the milestone restructuring covenants are inappropriate;

   -- the relief sought precludes the Committee from properly
      performing its duties on behalf of general unsecured
      creditors;

   -- the proposed waiver of Section 506(c) of the Bankruptcy
      Code is inappropriate; and

   -- the granting of superpriority liens and claims attaching to
      the proceeds of avoidance actions improperly transfers to
      the Lenders assets that are intended for the benefit of the
      estates.

In addition, Ms. Jones mentions other objectionable provisions of
the proposed financing including:

   (a) the budget;

   (b) payments to the Prepetition Lenders and the Postpetition
       Lenders;

   (c) the Lenders' professional fees;

   (d) events of default;

   (e) provisions which prevent challenge to the Debtors' sale
       lease back transactions;

   (f) inadequate notice upon default provisions;

   (g) the lease and real property rights given to the Lenders;

   (h) the prohibition of seeking the appointment of a
       responsible person, trustees and examiners with expanded
       powers, without triggering defaults; and

   (i) the "good faith" finding notwithstanding the insufficiency
       of any sworn factual record in support.

In a separate request, the Committee asks the Court for authority
to file its detailed objection under seal in order to maintain
the confidentiality of information.

Ms. Jones tells the Court that the Committee's detailed objection
contain confidential information concerning the Debtors' business
and operations.

Headquartered in Eagan, Minnesota, Buffets Holdings Inc. --
http://www.buffet.com/-- is the parent company of Buffets, Inc.,    
which operates 626 restaurants in 39 states, comprised of 615
steak-buffet restaurants and eleven Tahoe Joe's Famous Steakhouse
restaurants, and franchises sixteen steak-buffet restaurants in
six states.  The restaurants are principally operated under the
Old Country Buffet, HomeTown Buffet, Ryan's and Fire Mountain
brands.  Buffets, Inc. employs approximately 37,000 team members
and serves approximately 200 million customers annually.

The company and all of its subsidiaries filed Chapter 11
protection on Jan. 22, 2008 (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 08-10141 to
08-10158).  The Debtors' balance sheet as of Sept. 19, 2007,
showed total assets of $963,538,000 and total liabilities of
$1,156,262,000.  (Buffets Holdings Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 7;
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service Inc., http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/  
or 215/945-7000)


CHAMPION ENTERPRISES: Posts $6MM Net Loss in Quarter Ended Dec. 29
------------------------------------------------------------------
Champion Enterprises Inc. reported results for fourth quarter and
fiscal year ended Dec. 29, 2007.  The company reported a net loss
for the quarter of $6 million compared to net income of
$3.6 million for the same period of the prior year.

The loss before income taxes in the fourth quarter of 2007
included these items:

   -- $6.4 million of expense recorded in connection with the earn
      out provisions of the 2006 acquisition of Calsafe Group
      (Holdings) Ltd.;

   -- loss on debt retirement of $4.5 million as a result of the
      company's changes to its debt structure; and

   -- charges totaling $3.6 million related to the closure of a
      manufacturing facility.  

Pre- tax income for the fourth quarter of 2006 was reduced by a
$0.4 million loss on debt retirement.

Net income for 2007 totaled $7.2 million compared to net income of
$138.3 million in 2006.  Net income in 2006 included  
$101.9 million of income from the reversal of the recorded
deferred tax valuation allowance and $4.7 million of pre-tax gains
from property sales.

"While our earnings continue to be pressured by deteriorating
conditions in the U.S. housing markets, our efforts to diversify
and build a strong international platform continue to mitigate
these pressures," William Griffiths, chairman, president and chief
executive officer of Champion Enterprises Inc., stated.  "Our non-
U.S. revenues increased 135% in 2007, contributing over 30% of our
total revenues and strong cash returns.

"Thanks to the focused work of our operations both in North
America and internationally, our free cash flow improved over
60% to $69 million in 2007 despite a decline in reported earnings
for the year," Mr. Griffiths added.  "As a result, our cash
position continued to improve, ending 2007 at $135 million.  This,
coupled with the successful refinancing we completed during the
fourth quarter, leaves Champion well positioned to continue to
execute its growth and diversification strategies."

               About Champion Enterprises Inc.

Based in Auburn Hills, Michigan, Champion Enterprises Inc. (NYSE:
CHB) -- http://www.championhomes.com/-- operates 31 manufacturing   
facilities in North America and the United Kingdom working with
independent retailers, builders and developers.  The Champion
family of builders produces manufactured and modular homes, as
well as modular buildings for government and commercial
applications.

                          *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Dec. 12, 2007,
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services raised its ratings on Champion
Enterprises Inc.'s senior notes due 2009 and on Champion Home
Builders Co.'s senior secured credit facility to 'B+' from 'B'.
At the same time, S&P upgraded the recovery ratings on the senior
notes and the credit facility to '3' from '5'.  Concurrently, S&P
affirmed the 'B+' corporate credit ratings.  The outlook for both
entities is stable.


CHIQUITA BRANDS: Posts $26 Mil. Net Loss in Qtr. Ended December 31
------------------------------------------------------------------
Chiquita Brands International Inc. released financial and
operating results for the fourth quarter and full-year ended Dec.
31, 2007.

The company reported a net loss of $26 million including a charge
of $26 million related to the company's restructuring plan.  In
the year-ago period, the company reported a net loss of
$42 million including a $25 million accrual related to the
settlement of a U.S. Department of Justice investigation.

The company's fourth quarter operating loss of $11 million was on
the favorable end of the estimated operating loss range of
$10-20 million provided in the company's preliminary selected
results release on Jan. 28, 2008.

For the full year, the company reported a net loss of $49 million,
compared to a net loss of $96 million in 2006.

"Our results reflect the proactive steps we took throughout the
year to position us to transform and grow our business," said
Fernando Aguirre, chairman and chief executive officer.  "We have
continued to focus on pricing in bananas and recovery in value-
added salads to help offset persistent external cost challenges."

"In 2008, we will be focused on maintaining our premium brands,
improving North American profitability and completing the
restructuring we implemented in October," Mr. Aguirre added.  "We
also will invest in the development of new value-added products to
extend our brands, expand consumption and drive growth in higher-
margin distribution channels and profitable geographies.  We
believe that these strategies will help us to achieve our vision
of becoming the global leader in healthy, fresh and convenient
foods."

                      Business Restructuring

The restructuring plan, disclosed in October 2007, is on track to
generate new, sustainable cost savings of approximately
$60-80 million this year.  The savings are being generated from a
reduction in compensation related expenses, which is already
implemented, and consolidation of processing and distribution
facilities, which will be completed at the end of the first
quarter 2008.

The plan is designed to accelerate the company's long-term
strategy to become the leader in healthy, fresh foods well as to
improve profitability and efficiency through consolidation of
operations and simplification of overhead structure.

The restructuring will drive greater integration and efficiency
across business units and geographies, resulting in one
relationship manager for customers, a supply chain, and an
innovation program with targeted priorities and better execution.
As reported, the company incurred a $26 million one-time charge in
the fourth quarter 2007 related to severance costs and certain
asset write-downs under the restructuring plan.

                       Refinancing Progress

The company also reported continued progress in a refinancing
expected to lower interest expense, extend debt maturities and add
significant additional covenant flexibility.

After the consent solicitation from the holders of the company's
7-1/2% Senior Notes due 2014, the company issued $200 million
aggregate principal amount of 4.25% Convertible Senior Notes due
2016.  Net proceeds of approximately $194 million have been used
to repay a portion of the outstanding amounts under the company's
Term Loan C of its senior secured credit facility.

The Notes are convertible, under certain circumstances, at an
initial conversion rate of 44.5524 shares of common stock per
$1,000 original principal amount of Notes, equivalent to an
initial conversion price of approximately $22.45 per share of
Chiquita common stock, subject to adjustment.  This represents a
premium of approximately 32.5% to the last reported sale price of
Chiquita's common stock on Feb. 6, 2008 of $16.94.

The company has also entered into a fully underwritten commitment
with Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen - Boerenleenbank B.A.,
"Rabobank Nederland," New York branch to refinance the company's
existing $200 million revolving credit facility and the remaining
portion of the company's Term Loan C.

Pursuant to the terms of the commitment letter Rabobank has
committed to provide to the company a six-year senior secured
credit facility including a $200 million revolving credit facility
and a $200 million term loan.  The company expects to close the
new facility by March 31, 2008.

            About Chiquita Brands International Inc.

Cincinnati, Ohio-based Chiquita Brands International, Inc.
(NYSE: CQB) -- http://www.chiquita.com/-- markets and distributes      
fresh food products including bananas and nutritious blends of
green salads.  The company markets its products under the
Chiquita(R) and Fresh Express(R) premium brands and other related
trademarks.  Chiquita employs approximately 25,000 people
operating in more than 70 countries worldwide, including Belgium,
Columbia, Germany, Panama, Philippines, among others.

                          *     *     *

Chiquita Brands International Inc. continues to carry Moody's
Investors Service's B3 long term corporate family and Caa2 senior
unsecured debt ratings which were placed on Nov. 6, 2006.  The
outlook is negative.


COACH AMERICA: Profit Pressues Prompt S&P to Cut Rating to B-
-------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its corporate credit
rating on Dallas, Texas-based Coach America Holdings Inc. to 'B-'
from 'B'.  All ratings were removed from CreditWatch, where they
were placed with negative implications on Oct. 30, 2007.  The
outlook is now negative.
     
"The downgrade reflects Coach America's recent profit pressures,"
said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Funmi Afonja.  "While
management is undertaking various actions to improve operating
performance -- and we believe that this will result in improved
results over time -- we still expect the financial profile to
remain weaker than previously expected, at least over the near
term," she added.
     
At the same time, Standard & Poor's lowered the senior secured
debt ratings to 'B', one notch above the corporate credit rating,
while leaving the recovery rating unchanged at '2', indicating
expectations of a substantial (70%-90%) recovery in the event of a
payment default.  Also, Standard & Poor's lowered the second-lien
credit facility rating to 'CCC', two notches below the corporate
credit rating, while leaving the recovery rating unchanged at '6',
indicating expectations of a negligible (0%-10%) recovery in the
event of a payment default.
     
Coach America is the largest charter bus operator and the second-
largest motorcoach services provider in the U.S.  The company was
formed in 2003 from the divestiture of the Western and South
Central regional businesses of Coach USA to a private equity
group.


CONGOLEUM CORP: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
---------------------------------------------------
The Honorable Kathryn C. Ferguson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of New Jersey approved Congoleum Corp. and its
debtor-affiliates' Disclosure Statement that describes their
Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.

Judge Ferguson said that the Debtors' Disclosure Statement
contains adequate information within the meaning of Section 1125
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Feb. 11, 2008, the
Official Committee of Bondholders and the Committee of Asbestos
Claimants in the Debtors' cases have agreed to support the
Debtors' amended plan of reorganization.

Congoleum's amended Chapter 11 reorganization plan was filed by
the future claimants' representative in its Chapter 11
proceedings.  If the plan is approved by the court and accepted by
the requisite creditor constituencies, it will permit Congoleum to
exit Chapter 11 free of liability for existing or future asbestos
claims.

Under the terms of the amended plan, a trust will be created that
assumes the liability for Congoleum's current and future asbestos
claims.  That trust will receive the proceeds of various
settlements Congoleum has reached with a number of insurance
carriers, and will be assigned Congoleum's rights under its
remaining policies covering asbestos product liability.  The trust
will also receive 50.1% of the newly issued common stock in
reorganized Congoleum when the plan takes effect.

Holders of Congoleum's $100 million in 8.625% senior notes due in
August 2008 will receive on a pro rata basis $80 million in new
9.75% senior secured notes that mature five years from issuance.
The new senior secured notes will be subordinated to the working
capital facility that provides Congoleum's financing upon exiting
reorganization.  In addition, holders of the $100 million in
8.625% senior notes due in August 2008 will receive 49.9% of the
common stock in reorganized Congoleum.  Congoleum's obligations
for the $100 million in 8.625% senior notes due in August 2008,
including accrued interest -- which amounted to $44.6 million at
Dec. 31, 2007 -- will be satisfied by the new senior secured notes
and the common stock issued when the plan takes effect.

Under the terms of the amended plan, existing Class A and Class B
common shares of Congoleum will be cancelled when the plan takes
effect and holders of those shares, including the current
controlling shareholder American Biltrite will not receive
anything on account of their cancelled shares.  Congoleum expects
existing management will continue post-reorganization.

The insurers in the Debtors' cases are instructed to file and
serve briefs as to whether they have standing with regard to
confirmation of the proposed plan by Feb. 29, 2008.  Responses
shall be filed and served by March 14, 2008.  No reply papers may
be filed.  Court will hold a hearing on the briefs on March 25,
2008 at 2:30 p.m.

                      About Congoleum Corp.

Based in Mercerville, New Jersey, Congoleum Corporation (AMEX:CGM)
-- http://www.congoleum.com/-- manufactures and sells resilient
sheet and tile floor covering products with a wide variety of
product features, designs and colors.  The company filed for
chapter 11 protection on Dec. 31, 2003 (Bankr. N.J. Case No.
03-51524) as a means to resolve claims asserted against it related
to the use of asbestos in its products decades ago.

Richard L. Epling, Esq., Robin L. Spear, Esq., and Kerry A.
Brennan, Esq., at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, and Paul S.
Hollander, Esq., and James L. DeLuca, Esq., at Okin, Hollander &
DeLuca, LLP, represent the Debtors.  At March 31 2007, Congoleum
reported $180,091,000 in total assets and $226,990,000 in total
liabilities, resulting in a stockholders' deficit $46,899,000.

The Asbestos Claimants' Committee is represented by Peter Van N.
Lockwood, Esq., and Ronald Reinsel, Esq., at Caplin & Drydale,
Chtd.  The Bondholders' Committee is represented by Michael S.
Stamer, Esq., and james R. Savin, Esq., at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer
& Feld LLP.  Nancy Isaacson, Esq., at Goldstein Isaacson, PC,
represents the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.

R. Scott Williams, Esq., of Haskell Slaughter Young & Rediker,
LLC, the Court-appointed Futures Claimants Representative, is
represented by Roger Frankel, Esq., Richard Wyron, Esq., and
Jonathan P. Guy, Esq., at Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, and
Stephen B. Ravin, Esq., at Forman Holt Eliades & Ravin LLC.

American Biltrite, Inc. (AMEX: ABL), which owns 55% of Congoleum,
is represented by Matthew Ward, Esq., Mark S. Chehi, Esq.,
Christopher S. Chow, Esq., and Matthew P. Ward, Esq., at Skadden
Arps Slate Meagher & Flom.


CORNERSTONE-CAMERON: White Eagle Wins Bid for Apartments at $16MM
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Two apartment complexes acquired in 1997 by bankrupt Cornerstone-
Cameron & Stonegate Inc. are about to be sold to White Eagle
Properties for $16 million, Andy Meek of The Daily News reports.

The apartments, Stonegate Apartments in Raleigh and Autumnwood
Apartments in Southeast Memphis, have a total of 532 units and is
currently valued at $14.4 million, Daily News says.

According to the report, White Eagle outbid 53 other interested
buyers.

Blake Pera at CB Richard Ellis, which serves as broker, told Daily
News that they have been marketing the apartment complexes upon
the order of the U.S. Bankrutpcy Court for the Western District of
Tennessee.

The Bank of New York Trust Co., indenture trustee of the bonds
secured by the properties, asked Judge David S. Kennedy to approve
the sale, Daily News reveals.  The Debtor bought the properties
from the proceeds of bonds issued by the Health, Educational and
Housing Facility Board of Shelby County for $22 million in the
aggregate, Daily News says.

                  Background to Bankruptcy Filing

The Daily News recalls that Cornerstone-Cameron was facing a
lawsuit demanding the sale of the apartments, which was put on
hold by the bankruptcy proceedings.  Revenues from the apartments
had been declining partly because of the crime problem and gang
fights within the vicinity, Daily News quotes Douglas Margerum at
Equity Management Inc. as saying.

                    About Cornerstone-Cameron

Laurel, Maryland-based Cornerstone-Cameron & Stonegate Inc. is a
charitable organization engaged in housing development,
construction and management.  The Debtor filed for chapter 11 on
Aug. 20, 2007 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 07-27849). Judge David
S. Kennedy handles the case.  Steven N. Douglass, Esq., at Harris
Shelton Hanover Walsh, PLLC serves as counsel to the Debtor.  When
the Debtor filed for bankruptcy, it listed assets and debts
between $1 million and $100 million.


CORPORATE EXPRESS: S&P Puts 'BB-' Credit Rating Under Pos. Watch
----------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services placed its 'BBB+' corporate
credit and all other ratings on Framingham, Massachussetts-based
Staples Inc. on CreditWatch with negative implications.  The
CreditWatch action follows the company's announcement that
it made a cash offer to acquire all the outstanding shares of
Netherlands-based office products distributor Corporate Express
N.V.'s ordinary stock for a per share consideration of 7.25,
representing a total enterprise value of approximately 2.5 billion
($3.7 billion).

"Although specific financing details have not yet been disclosed
regarding a potential transaction, we believe that in the event
Corporate Express shareholders ultimately accept an offer, a
substantial portion of the acquisition would be debt-financed,"
said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Stella Kapur, "which we
expect would weaken Staples' credit protection measures below
levels appropriate for the current ratings."
     
At the same time, Standard & Poor's placed its 'BB-' corporate
credit rating on Corporate Express on CreditWatch with positive
implications.
      
"Corporate Express' CreditWatch placement reflects the possibility
that we could raise the ratings on the company if a potential
transaction materializes," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst
Mark Salierno, "given the stronger credit profile of Staples."
Although Staples' offer has been initially rejected by Corporate
Express, we believe there is a reasonable possibility that Staples
could continue to pursue this acquisition.
     
Standard & Poor's will seek to resolve or update the CreditWatch
listings within 90 days.  S&P will monitor developments and meet
with the Staples and Corporate Express management teams to
evaluate each company's respective financial policy and the
potential impact that such an acquisition would have on both
companies' credit profiles.


CROSSFIRE ENERGY: Lender to Ask Alberta Court to Name Receiver
--------------------------------------------------------------
Crossfire Energy Services Inc. received notice from its principal
lender that the company is in default with respect to its
financial covenants in its credit facility.

Further, the Lender has made demand for immediate payment of the
remaining balance under the credit facility.  The Lender has
notified it will proceed with the enforcement of its security
should such payment not be made.

In that regard, the Lender has advised that it will make
application to the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta for the
appointment of a receiver to manage the company's affairs.

The company will consent to this application.  The company will
issue further statements regarding the status of its affairs with
its principal lender and other stakeholders in due course.
    
The company also disclosed that the directors and officers have
resigned their respective positions with the company.

                About Crossfire Energy Services Inc.
   
Headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, Crossfire Energy Services Inc.
(CVE:CFE) -- http://www.crossfireenergy.ca/-- fka Crossfire  
Energy Services, is a full-service provider of fabrication,
construction, installation and maintenance for oilfield facilities
and pipelines.  The company also fabricates piping and process
equipment for oil sands projects.  It has fabrication,
construction and maintenance facilities in Calgary, Edmonton,
Grande Prairie and Zama City.


CRYOPORT INC: Posts $1.2M Net Loss in 3rd Qtr. Ended Dec. 31
------------------------------------------------------------
CryoPort Inc. reported a net loss of $1,217,193 on net sales of
$9,678 for the third quarter ended Dec. 31, 2007, compared with a
net loss of $399,348 on net sales of $27,931 in the corresponding
period ended Dec. 31, 2006.

Gross loss for the three month period ended Dec. 31, 2007,
increased to $91,761 compared to a gross loss of $17,110 for the
three month period ended Dec. 31, 2006.  

The increase in the gross loss is mainly attributable to increased
manufacturing overhead costs incurred as the company added
personnel and incurred additional equipment maintenance and repair
costs related to the planning and preparation for production of
the CryoPort Express(R) One-Way Shipper and to the production
shut-down as a result of the relocation and restructuring of the
company's production operations in Lake Forest, California,
initiated in mid-September 2007.  

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $153,021 to
$461,358 for the three month period ended Dec. 31, 2007, as
compared to $308,337 for the three month period ended Dec. 31,
2006.  

Interest expense increased $598,591 to $652,578 for the three
month period ended Dec. 31, 2007, as compared to $53,997 for the
three month period ended Dec. 31, 2006.  

                          Balance Sheet

At Dec. 31, 2007, the company's consolidated balance sheet showed
$4,159,145 in total assets, $3,215,152 in total liabilities, and
$943,993 in total stockholders' equity.

Full-text copies of the company's consolidated financial
statements for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2007, are available for
free at http://researcharchives.com/t/s?283e

                          Going Concern

KMJ Corbin & Company LLP, in Irvine, California, expressed
substantial doubt about CryoPort Inc.'s ability to continue as a
going concern after auditing the company's consolidated financial
statements for the years ended March 31, 2007, and 2006.  The
auditing firm reported that the company has incurred recurring
losses, and has a stockholders' deficit of $2,287,832 and negative
working capital of $478,396 at March 31, 2007.  

                       About CryoPort Inc.


Headquartered in Lake Forest, California, CryoPort Inc. (OTC BB:
CYRX.OB) -- http://www.cryoport.com/-- develops proprietary,  
technology-driven shipping and storage products for use in the
rapidly growing global biotechnology and biopharmaceutical cold
chain.  The products developed by CryoPort are essential
components of the infrastructure required for the testing,
research and end user delivery of temperature-sensitive medicines
and biomaterials in an increasingly complex logistical
environment.


DELPHI CORP: Hearing to Consider Bearings Biz Sale Set Today
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York  
will consider approval of Delphi Corp. and its debtor-affiliates'
Bearings Business Sale today, Feb. 21, 2008, at 10:00 a.m.,
prevailing Eastern time.  Stalking horse bidder ND Acquisition
Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of private equity investment firm
Resilience Capital Partners LLC, has proposed to buy the Debtors'
Bearings Business for $44,200,000.

                   Lease Assumption Objections

Certain parties had opposed the assumption of their executory
contracts in connection with the sale of the Debtors' global
wheel bearings business.

Barnes Group Inc. and Freudenberg-NOK General Partnership objected
to the zero cures for the assumption of their executory
contracts.  The parties related that they have not yet completed
their review of the Assumed Contracts.

Barnes also objected to the zero cures to the extent it is limited
to prepetition amounts owed by the Debtors.  Cure obligations are
not limited to prepetition defaults, Barnes reminds the Court,
citing Section 365(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.  Barnes asserts
that the Debtors should be required to cure, or provide adequate
assurance of prompt cure, of any postpetition defaults under the
Assumed Contracts.

The Timken Company and Timken U.S. Corp. complained that the
Debtors have not provided them with sufficient information to
identify the Assumed Contracts.  Timken believes that some of the
contracts may be related to a long-term agreement that the
Debtors have not identified for assumption or assignment.

According to Freudenberg-NOK and Timken, the Debtors have not
demonstrated that the proposed contract assignees are capable of
performing under the Assumed Contracts.

S&Z Metal Works Ltd. asserts that the Debtors should pay it at
least $163,451 for the assumption of its contracts.

                        About Delphi Corp.

Headquartered in Troy, Michigan, Delphi Corporation (PINKSHEETS:
DPHIQ) -- http://www.delphi.com/-- is the single supplier of   
vehicle electronics, transportation components, integrated systems
and modules, and other electronic technology.  The company's
technology and products are present in more than 75 million
vehicles on the road worldwide.  Delphi has regional headquarters
in Japan, Brazil and France.

The company filed for chapter 11 protection on Oct. 8, 2005
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 05-44481).  John Wm. Butler Jr.,
Esq., John K. Lyons, Esq., and Ron E. Meisler, Esq., at Skadden,
Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, represent the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts.  Robert J. Rosenberg, Esq., Mitchell A.
Seider, Esq., and Mark A. Broude, Esq., at Latham & Watkins LLP,
represent the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  As of
March 31, 2007, the Debtors' balance sheet showed $11,446,000,000
in total assets and $23,851,000,000 in total debts.

The Court approved Delphi's First Amended Joint Disclosure
Statement and related solicitation procedures for the solicitation
of votes on the First Amended Plan on Dec. 20, 2007.  The Court
confirmed the Debtors' First Amended Plan on Jan. 25, 2008.

(Delphi Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 112; Bankruptcy Creditors'
Service Inc., http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000)   

                          *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 16, 2008,
Moody's Investors Service assigned thes ratings to Delphi
Corporation for the company's financing for emergence from Chapter
11 bankruptcy protection: Corporate Family Rating of (P)B2;
$3.7 billion of first lien term loans, (P)Ba3; and $0.825 billion
of 2nd lien term debt, (P)B3.  In addition, a Speculative Grade
Liquidity rating of SGL-2 representing good liquidity was
assigned.  The outlook is stable.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 11, 2008,
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services expects to assign its 'B'
corporate credit rating to Delphi Corp. upon the company's
emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, which may occur
by the end of the first quarter of 2008.  S&P expects the outlook
to be negative.

In addition, Standard & Poor's expects to assign these
issue-level ratings: a 'B+' issue rating (one notch above the
corporate credit rating), and '2' recovery rating to the company's
proposed $3.7 billion senior secured first-lien term loan; and a
'B-' issue rating (one notch below the corporate creditrating),
and '5' recovery rating to the company's proposed $825 million
senior secured second-lien term loan.


DELPHI CORP: Wants to Strike Non-Conforming Cure Objections
-----------------------------------------------------------
Delphi Corp. and its debtor-affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York to strike, pursuant to
Section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code and Rule 9010 of the Federal
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure:

   (a) returned cure amount notices that do not conform with the
       Cure Claim Procedures; and

   (b) objections that were filed for which no cure amount
       notices were returned.

The Debtors are party to thousands of executory contracts, many
of which are with the Debtors' trade suppliers.  In accordance
with the confirmed First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization and
the Court-approved procedures relating to the assumption of
executory contracts, the Debtors embarked on a process to assume
ongoing prepetition Material Supply Agreements.

John Wm. Butler, Jr., Esq., at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom LLP, in Chicago, Illinois, relates that the Debtors served a
total of 1,669 cure amount notices on contract counterparties
stating their intent to assume, or assume and assign, the
parties' contracts and to provide cure for the assumption of the
contracts.  The Notices gave each Counterparty, among other
things, the right to elect to be paid the proposed cure amounts
in cash or Plan currency, and described certain Court-approved
procedures for the Counterparties to object to the assumption of
their contracts or to the proposed cure amounts.  The Cure Claim
Procedures require the Counterparties to sign and return the
original Cure Amount Notices served on them.

In contravention of the specific instructions on the Cure Amount
Notices, however, a number of parties-in-interest submitted
nonconforming Cure Amount Notices to the Debtors.  The Debtors
received more than 100 nonconforming Cure Amount Notices.

Certain purchasers of claims also executed and returned self-made
forms designed to appear identical in form to the Court-approved
notices served by the Debtors, Mr. Butler tells the Court.  "In
fact, certain of these self-made forms were returned by
purchasers of claims even though no cure amounts were owed to the
purported assignors."  The Debtors, he points out, imprinted
unique bar codes upon the original Cure Amount Notices to prevent
the submission of self-made forms.

The Debtors have also been inundated with requests to deviate
from the Court-approved Cure Claim Procedures, Mr. Butler
relates.  He notes that in early January, the Ad Hoc Committee of
Delphi Trade Claim Holders sought but failed to convince the
Court to exempt them from certain provisions of the Cure Claim
Procedures, including enabling their committee members to execute
cure amount notices and directing the Debtors to make cure
payments directly to their members instead of paying the
underlying contract counterparties.  Judge Drain held that the
Trade Committee's request was contrary to the Cure Claim
Procedures and interferes with the Debtors' relationships with
their trade suppliers, which are important to the Debtors'
ongoing businesses.

Specifically, the Debtors wish to strike:

   * cure amount notices that include instructions to pay a party
     other than the counterparty;

   * cure amount notices that were executed by a third party
     (rather than the contract counterparty), which third party
     did not satisfy the requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 9010;

   * cure amount notices from parties who failed to return an
     executed original cure amount notice and instead returned a
     self-made form for which a related assumable contract exists
     or a copy of the cure amount notice;

   * cure amount notices from parties who failed to return an
     executed original cure amount notice for which no related
     assumable contract exists;

   * objections that were filed to cure by parties who failed to
     return the cure amount notice; and

   * cure amount notices that were returned after the 7:00 p.m.
     prevailing Eastern time deadline on Jan. 11, 2008.

To the extent the Court grants the Debtors' request with respect
to a specific party, the Debtors ask the Court to entitle the
applicable counterparty to receive only the default cure election
treatment or the Plan currency to be distributed to holders of
allowed general unsecured claims in the cure amount listed in the
cure amount notice.

A list of the Debtors' proposed cure amounts is available for
free at: http://bankrupt.com/misc/Delphi_PlanCures.pdf

                   Cure & Assumption Objections

On Jan. 29, 2008, the Debtors delivered to the Court a list of
proposed cures for the assumption and assignment of certain
executory contracts as provided in the confirmed First Amended
Plan and the First Amended Disclosure Statement.

A number of parties-in-interest complain that the proposed cures
for the assumption of their contracts are understated.  Several
objectors assert that they have not been given adequate assurance
of any proposed assignee's performance under the Assumed
Contracts.

A dozen objectors assert that they should be paid these cures:

                                          Debtors'    Objector's
                                          Proposed    Proposed
   Cure Objector                          Cure Amt.   Cure Amt.
   -------------                          ---------   ----------
   Ambrake Corp.                           $113,072     $347,716
   Citation Corp., et al.                   577,482      595,681
   Furukawa Electric Company Ltd.            31,308       58,992
   Furukawa Electric North America APD    2,664,471    2,832,655
   MacArthur Corp.                           18,074       38,708
   Magneti Marelli Powertrain USA Inc.            -       29,435
   Master Automatic, Inc.                         -        7,613
   McGill Manufacturing Company Inc.              -       36,493
   Metal-Matic Inc.                          43,080       86,009
   PBR Columbia LLC                               -      195,469
   Quasar Industries, Inc.                        -      528,714
   Tinnerman Palnut Engineered Products       7,229      271,401

SKF USA Inc. contends that it is entitled to payment in full and
in cash of all outstanding postpetition invoices under its
contracts.  SKF USA also points out that certain of its contracts
have expired and are, thus, no longer executory contracts that
can be assumed.

United Plastics Group De Mexico, S. De R.L. De C.V., relates that
its books and records do not show a contract with the account
number ascribed by the Debtors.  Accordingly, UPG Mexico has no
way of determining whether or not the Debtors' proposed zero cure
amount for the alleged UPG Contract is correct.  UPG Mexico
asserts that it is owed no less than $136,482 under its
agreements with Delphi Automotive Systems LLC.

Barnes Group Inc., Daewoo International Corp., DGC-Plastic
Molding Inc., Freudenber-NOK General Partnership, and Hayes
Lemmerz International, Inc., relate that they have not yet
completed their review of the Assumed Contracts.  Barnes objects
to the proposed cures for its contracts to the extent the
Debtors' cure obligations are limited to prepetition amounts.  
Furukawa relates that the Debtors have not provided it with
sufficient information to identify two of the Assumed Contracts,
thus, it is unable to verify whether the proposed cures are
correct.

AT&T Corp. and XM Satellite Radio Inc. note that the First
Amended Plan provides for the assumption of all contracts not
specifically rejected by the Debtors.  The Debtors have not
rejected, or proposed to reject, the parties' executory
contracts.  AT&T and XM Satellite assert that the Debtors must
cure all defaults under their contracts before those contracts
may be assumed and assigned.  According to AT&T, the Debtors owe
it $8,255,577 under the parties' contracts.  XM Satellite asserts
that $1,017,448 is outstanding under its contracts with the
Debtors.

                        About Delphi Corp.

Headquartered in Troy, Michigan, Delphi Corporation (PINKSHEETS:
DPHIQ) -- http://www.delphi.com/-- is the single supplier of   
vehicle electronics, transportation components, integrated systems
and modules, and other electronic technology.  The company's
technology and products are present in more than 75 million
vehicles on the road worldwide.  Delphi has regional headquarters
in Japan, Brazil and France.

The company filed for chapter 11 protection on Oct. 8, 2005
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 05-44481).  John Wm. Butler Jr.,
Esq., John K. Lyons, Esq., and Ron E. Meisler, Esq., at Skadden,
Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, represent the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts.  Robert J. Rosenberg, Esq., Mitchell A.
Seider, Esq., and Mark A. Broude, Esq., at Latham & Watkins LLP,
represents the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  As of
March 31, 2007, the Debtors' balance sheet showed $11,446,000,000
in total assets and $23,851,000,000 in total debts.

The Court approved Delphi's First Amended Joint Disclosure
Statement and related solicitation procedures for the solicitation
of votes on the First Amended Plan on Dec. 20, 2007.  The Court
confirmed the Debtors' First Amended Plan on Jan. 25, 2008.

(Delphi Bankruptcy News, Issue 112; Bankruptcy Creditors' Service
Inc., http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000)   

                          *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 16, 2008,
Moody's Investors Service assigned ratings to Delphi Corporation
for the company's financing for emergence from Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection: Corporate Family Rating of (P)B2;
$3.7 billion of first lien term loans, (P)Ba3; and $0.825 billion
of 2nd lien term debt, (P)B3.  In addition, a Speculative Grade
Liquidity rating of SGL-2 representing good liquidity was
assigned.  The outlook is stable.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 11, 2008,
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services expects to assign its 'B'
corporate credit rating to Troy, Michigan-based automotive
supplier Delphi Corp. upon the company's emergence from Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection, which may occur by the end of the first
quarter of 2008.  S&P expects the outlook to be negative.

In addition, Standard & Poor's expects to assign these
issue-level ratings: a 'B+' issue rating (one notch above the
corporate credit rating), and '2' recovery rating to the company's
proposed $3.7 billion senior secured first-lien term loan; and a
'B-' issue rating (one notch below the corporate creditrating),
and '5' recovery rating to the company's proposed $825 million
senior secured second-lien term loan.


DELPHI CORP: Cuts CEO Rodney O'Neal's Emergence Incentive to $1MM
-----------------------------------------------------------------
As disclosed in a 10-K filing with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Delphi Corp. and its debtor-affiliates
slashed the bonus payable to CEO Rodney O'Neal upon the company's
emergence from bankruptcy protection, from $5.3 million to
$1 million.

Aside from receiving an emergence cash award value of $1,011,621,
Mr. O'Neal will obtain an emergence equity award valued at
$10,500,000.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 24, 2008, the
Honorable Robert Drain of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York said he will approve the Debtors'
First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization on the condition that
the total payout of cash bonuses to top executives is reduced.

"I am prepared to enter the confirmation order, provided the
management compensation plan is changed," Judge Drain said at a
confirmation hearing.

The Court wanted the bonus for Delphi's officers reduced to $16.5
million in the aggregate from the $87.9 million that Delphi had
proposed to award to 500 managers upon emergence.  But the United
Auto Workers and the International Union of Electronic Workers-
Communications Workers of America objected to the payments,
citing, among other things, that while unionized Delphi employees
suffered pay-cuts, the managers, who are already adequately
compensated, are given generous bonuses.

The management compensation plan sought to grant an $8.3 million
"performance payment" to Executive Chairman Robert Miller; and a
$5.3 million cash emergence payment to Mr. O'Neal.

                       About Delphi Corp.

Based in Troy, Michigan, Delphi Corporation (PINKSHEETS:
DPHIQ) -- http://www.delphi.com/-- is the single supplier of   
vehicle electronics, transportation components, integrated systems
and modules, and other electronic technology.  The company's
technology and products are present in more than 75 million
vehicles on the road worldwide.  Delphi has regional headquarters
in Japan, Brazil and France.

The company filed for chapter 11 protection on Oct. 8, 2005
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 05-44481).  John Wm. Butler Jr.,
Esq., John K. Lyons, Esq., and Ron E. Meisler, Esq., at Skadden,
Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, represent the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts.  Robert J. Rosenberg, Esq., Mitchell A.
Seider, Esq., and Mark A. Broude, Esq., at Latham & Watkins LLP,
represents the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  As of
March 31, 2007, the Debtors' balance sheet showed $11,446,000,000
in total assets and $23,851,000,000 in total debts.

The Court approved Delphi's First Amended Joint Disclosure
Statement and related solicitation procedures for the solicitation
of votes on the First Amended Plan on Dec. 20, 2007.  The Court
confirmed the Debtors' First Amended Plan on Jan. 25, 2008.

                          *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 16, 2008,
Moody's Investors Service assigned ratings to Delphi Corporation
for the company's financing for emergence from Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection: Corporate Family Rating of (P)B2;
$3.7 billion of first lien term loans, (P)Ba3; and $0.825 billion
of 2nd lien term debt, (P)B3.  In addition, a Speculative Grade
Liquidity rating of SGL-2 representing good liquidity was
assigned.  The outlook is stable.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 11, 2008,
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services expects to assign its 'B'
corporate credit rating to Troy, Michigan-based automotive
supplier Delphi Corp. upon the company's emergence from Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection, which may occur by the end of the first
quarter of 2008.  S&P expects the outlook to be negative.

In addition, Standard & Poor's expects to assign these
issue-level ratings: a 'B+' issue rating (one notch above the
corporate credit rating), and '2' recovery rating to the company's
proposed $3.7 billion senior secured first-lien term loan; and a
'B-' issue rating (one notch below the corporate creditrating),
and '5' recovery rating to the company's proposed $825 million
senior secured second-lien term loan.


DURA AUTOMOTIVE: Backstop Rights Deal with Pacificor LLC Expires
----------------------------------------------------------------
DURA Automotive Systems, Inc., disclosed in a regulatory filing
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, that its
Backstop Purchase Agreement with Pacificor, LLC, was terminated
as of Jan. 31, 2008.  

As a result of the termination, Pacificor has no further
obligations under the agreement with respect to its backstop
commitment, C. Timothy Trenary, DURA's vice president and chief
financial officer, said.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 7, 2008,
Pacificor, under the Backstop Agreement, committed to purchase up
to $160,000,000 in reorganized DURA by buying shares of new common
stock that were not purchased in an equity rights offering.  The
Pacificor commitment, which expired Jan. 31, 2008, was contingent
upon DURA obtaining the exit financing prior to that date.

Rochester Hills, Mich.-based DURA Automotive Systems Inc.
(Nasdaq: DRRA) -- http://www.DURAauto.com/-- is an independent   
designer and manufacturer of driver control systems, seating
control systems, glass systems, engineered assemblies, structural
door modules and exterior trim systems for the global automotive
industry.  The company is also a supplier of similar products to
the recreation vehicle and specialty vehicle industries.  DURA
sells its automotive products to North American, Japanese and
European original equipment manufacturers and other automotive
suppliers.

The company has three locations in Asia -- China, Japan and
Korea. &nb