T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, April 14, 2008, Vol. 12, No. 88

                             Headlines

4S DEVELOPMENT: Gets Court OK to Employ Theune Law as Counsel
AAAAA ENTERPRISES: Case Summary & 19 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ACACIA CDO: Moody's Reviews 'Ba1' Rating on $11.5 Million Notes
ACACIA OPTION: Moody's Reviews 'Ba1' Rating for Possible Downgrade
ACCELLENT INC: Board Appoints Craig Campbell as Controller

ACE SECURITIES: 35 Tranches From Six Deals Get Moody's Rating Cuts
ADVANCED CELL: Files Amended Disclosure on "2008 Financing"
ADVANCED MICRO: Acquires Beteiligungs Interests in AMD FAB 36 KG
AIRBORNE HEALTH: S&P Gives Negative Outlook; Holds 'CCC+' Rating
ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS: S&P Holds Negative CreditWatch on 'BB' Rating

ALOHA AIRLINES: Gets Initial OK to Access GMAC's $3 Mil. Facility
AMERICAN AIRLINES: Cancellations Won't Affect S&P's 'B' Rating
AMERICAN AXLE: Inks Contract Pacts with Unions in Mexico and UK
AMERICAN AXLE: UAW Rejects Assistance of Federal Mediator
AMP'D MOBILE: Court OKs Protocol for Settling Preference Claims

AMP'D MOBILE: Settles Preference Suit with Motorola, et al.
AMP'D MOBILE: Seeks $1MM in Preference Claims from 18 Payees
AMR CORP: Airline Operating Schedule Is Back to Normal, WSJ Says
ARGENT SECURITIES: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 104 Tranches
ATA AIRLINES: Gets Interim Permission to Use Lenders' Collateral

ATA AIRLINES: Taps Haynes and Boone as Bankruptcy Counsel
ATA AIRLINES: Taps Baker & Daniels as Local Bankruptcy Counsel
ATA AIRLINES: Sec. 341 Meeting of Creditors Scheduled for May 30
ATHOS FUNDING: Moody's Junks Ratings on Two Classes of 2043 Notes
AXM PHARMA: To Restate 2004 Financial Statements Due to Errors

BATTERY PARK: Moody's Reviews Two 'Ca' Ratings For Likely Upgrade
BAYTEX ENERGY: Strong Credit Profile Cues S&P's Positive Outlook
BEAR STEARNS: Moody's Lowers Ratings on 268 Tranches From 27 Deals
BEARD COMPANY: Closes Sale of 35% Interest in McElmo Dome CO2 Unit
BEARD COMPANY: Inks Amendments to Two Lines of Credit

BH BOULDERS: Wants to Hire Anderson Aquino as Bankruptcy Counsel
BRAINTECH INC: Smythe Ratcliffe Expresses Going Concern Doubt
C-BASS MORTGAGE: Three Tranches Acquire Moody's Rating Downgrades
CENTRAL ILLINOIS: Sale May Be Further Delayed, Judge Perkins Says
CENTRAL ILLINOIS: Wants Court to Extend Exclusive Periods

CHEROKEE INT: Mayer Hoffman Expresses Going Concern Doubt
CHRYSLER LLC: Underwriter Unloads Chrysler Loan at a Discount
CIRCUS AND ELDORADO: S&P Maintains 'B' Rating on $160 Mil. Notes
CITIGROUP MORTGAGE: Moody's Junks Ratings on Three Tranches
CLEAR CHANNEL: Texas Court Rejects Banks' Request to Dismiss Suit

CLEAR CHANNEL: Banks Ask NY Court for Summary Judgment on Deal
COMPLIANCE SYSTEMS: Holtz Rubenstein Raises Going Concern Doubt
COUNTRYWIDE TRANCHES: Recent Losses Cues Moody's 63 Rating Cuts
CPS CAYMAN: S&P Attaches 'BB' Rating on Class C 2008-A Notes
CRDENTIA CORP: Appoints David Jenkins & Raymond Dunn to Board

CREDIT DEFAULT I: Moody's Reviews Low-B Ratings on Credit Swaps
CREDIT DEFAULT II: Moody's Cuts Ratings on Three Classes to Low-Bs
CREDIT DEFAULT III: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Three Classes
CREDIT DEFAULT IV: Moody's Pares Prime Ratings on Swaps to Low-Bs
DAGWOOD'S SANDWICH: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

DIOMED HOLDINGS: To Sell U.S. Biz to AngioDynamics for $8 Mil.
DIRECTED ELECTRONICS: Likely Pact Violations Cues S&P's 'B' Rating
DOLE FOOD: To Sell Properties to Avoid Default on $350MM Bonds
DUNMORE HOMES: Asks Court to Set Confirmation Hearing on June 24
DUNMORE HOMES: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set April 29

EDUCATION RESOURCES: Taps Goodwin Procter as Bankruptcy Counsel
EDUCATION RESOURCES: Endorses Grant Thornton as Financial Advisor
EDUCATION RESOURCES: Taps Craig and Macauley as Special Counsel
EMI GROUP: Citigroup Cancels Sale of $4.9 Billion Company Loans
FINANCIAL GUARANTY: To Help Solve Jefferson County's Debt Woes

FINISAR CORP: A. Olsson Resigns as SVP of Optics Division
FIRST MARBLEHEAD: S&P's Trust Ratings Unstirred By TERI Bankruptcy
FIRST AMERICAN: Fitch Chips Ratings and Puts on Negative Watch
FIRST FRANKLIN: Fitch Downgrades Ratings on $1.7 Bil. Certificates
FOAMEX INTERNATIONAL: DE Shaw to Backstop $115MM Rights Offering

FOAMEX INTERNATIONAL: Inks Amendments to Term Credit Agreements
FORAOIS FUNDING: Moody's Withdraws 'Ca' Rating on $92.4 Mil. Notes
FRONTIER AIRLINES: Files Voluntary Chapter 11 Protection in NY
FRONTIER AIRLINES: Obtains Court Approval on First Day Motions
GAP INC: March 2008 Net Sales Decrease 12% at $1.37 Billion

FRONTIER AIRLINES: Case Summary & 60 Largest Unsecured Creditors
GPX I: Case Summary & 61 Largest Unsecured Creditors
GSAA HOME: Delinquencies Cues Moody's Rating Cuts on 245 Tranches
GSC ABS: Moody's Reviews 'Ba2' Rating on $20 Mil. Class C Notes
GUARDIAN TECH: Discloses Late Payment of Interest on Debentures

HARBOURVIEW CDO: Moody's Junks Rating on $10 Mil. Notes From Baa2
HAYES LEMMERZ: Net Loss Grows to $194MM in Year Ended January 31
HORIZON MANAGEMENT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
INABS RMBS: Moody's Lowers Ratings on 92 Tranches From Nine Deals
INDEPENDENCE VII: Moody's Reviews Ratings on Weak Credit Quality

INDIANTOWN COGENERATION: S&P Holds 'BB+' Rating on $505 Mil. Bonds
INTREPID TECH: John Haffey Appointed Chief Executive Officer
IVY LANE: Moody's Junks Ratings on Four Classes of 2046 Notes
IXION PLC: Five Classes of Notes Get Moody's Rating Downgrades
IXIS ABS: Moody's Reviews Ba1 Rating on B-2L Notes For Likely Cut

IXIS REAL: Delinquencies Cues Moody's Rating Cuts on 63 Tranches
JACKSON 2006: Seven Classes of Notes Obtain Moody's Junk Ratings
JEFFERSON COUNTY: FGIC and XLCA Lends Help to Solve Debt Crisis
JETBLUE AIRWAYS: Chairman David Neeleman to Leave Effective May 15
JOHNSON RUBBER: Files Disclosure Statement and Chapter 11 Plan

JOURNAL REGISTER: Hiring of Fin'l Advisor Cues Moody's Rating Cuts
KHAMSIN CREDIT: Moody's Withdraws 'Ca' Rating on $12.5 Mil. Notes
KITTY HAWK: Files Disclosure Statement and Ch.11 Liquidation Plan
KITTY HAWK: Court Extends Exclusive Plan Filing Period to May 12
LEHMAN BROTHERS: Liquidates Funds Due to Adverse Market Conditions

LEINER HEALTH: Gets Permission to Borrow Under UBS DIP Facility
LIMITED BRANDS: March 2008 Sales Dip to $733MM from $892MM in 2007
LONG BEACH: Moody's Lowers Ratings on 15 Tranches From Two Deals
LUNAR FUNDING: Moody's Junks Rating on $25 Mil. Notes From 'Ba2'
MAGNA ENTERTAINMENT: Closes Austria Real Estate Sale for EUR20MM

MAJESTIC STAR: Inks Amendment to $80 Mil. Senior Credit Facility
MASTR 2005-HE1: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Eight Tranches
MEMORY PHARMA: KPMG LLP Expresses Going Concern Doubt
M/I HOMES: Selling Difficulty Cues Homebuilding Credit Amendment
MILLBROOK 2007-1: Moody's Slashes Ratings on Three Notes to 'Ca'

MORGAN STANLEY: S&P Downgrades Ratings on 15 Classes of Certs.
MORGAN STANLEY: Fitch Affirms Low-B Ratings on Three Cert. Classes
MOVIE GALLERY: Reaches Deal With Landlords on Plan Confirmation
MURRIETA COMMONS: Taps Burd & Naylor as General Insolvency Counsel
NA SCIENTIFIC: Nasdaq to Delist Securities on April 15

NATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP: Case Summary & 14 Largest Unsec. Creditors
NORTH COVE: Moody's Junks Ratings on $27 Mil. Notes From 'B1'
NORTH STREET: Moody's Cuts Ratings on $30 Mil. Notes From 'Ba1'
NOVASTAR MORTGAGE: Moody's Cuts Ratings on Three Classes to Low-Bs
NUANCE COMMS: $363 Mil. eScription Deal Won't Affect S&P's Ratings

OAKVALE CORP: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
OSYKA CORP: Seeks Court's Approval on Sale Bidding Procedures
OWNIT MORTGAGE: Two Classes Obtain Moody's Rating Cuts To Low-B
PACIFIC LUMBER: Spars with BoNY on Competing Turnaround Plans
PACIFIC LUMBER: Various Parties Support Marathan/Mendocino Plan

PACIFIC LUMBER: Joins Hands with BoNY; Rejects Marathon Plan
PERFORMANCE TRANS: Wants Lease Decision Period Moved to June 17
PORTA SYSTEMS: BDO Seidman Expresses Going Concern Doubt
PORTFOLIO CREDIT: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Swaps to 'Ca'
POWERMATE HOLDING: Wants to Hire Morgan Lewis as Counsel

POWERMATE HOLDING: Wants to Hire Young Conaway as Counsel
PREMIER GROUP: Case Summary & 11 Largest Unsecured Creditors
QUEBECOR WORLD: Wants Lease Assumption Period Extended to Aug. 18
QUEBECOR WORLD: Seeks 4-Month Extension of Plan Filing Period
QUEBECOR WORLD: Want Claims Removal Period Extended to July 21

RALI TRUST: Increase in Dollar Loan Amounts Cues S&P's Rating Cuts
RCS-CHANDLER: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
REGAL ENTERTAINMENT: Adjusts Conversion Price of Senior Notes
RITCHIE MULTI-STRATEGY: Court Dismisses Involuntary Ch. 11 Case
ROADRUNNER RIVER: Hires Robert M. Cook as Bankruptcy Counsel

ROYAL CARIBBEAN: S&P Chips Rating on Debenture-Backed A-1 Certs.
SALON MEDIA: Raises $1,000,000 in Sale of Convertible Notes
SECURITY CAPITAL: Unit Helps Solve Jefferson County's Debt Crisis
SENDTEC INC: Posts $27 Million Net loss in Year ended December 31
SEYAH HOSPICE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

SHARPER IMAGE: Court Approves Liquidation Deal with Hilco, Gordon
SHELLS SEAFOOD: Kirkland Russ Expresses Going Concern Doubt
SMARTIRE SYSTEMS: Appoints David A. Dodge as Interim CFO
SOLO CUP: Brian O'Connor Replaces Peter W. Calamari as Director
SOLUTIA INC: Air Liquide Seeks Allowance of $1,059,228 Claim

SOLUTIA INC: Professionals Charge $163,800,000 for Services
SOUTH STAR: Case Summary & 18 Largest Unsecured Creditors
SPYRUS INC: Asks Court to Set General Claims Bar Date May 20
STOCK-TRAK GROUP: RSM Richter Expresses Going Concern Doubt
STACK 2005-2: Weak Credit Quality Prompts Moody's Rating Reviews

STURGIS IRON: Asks Court to Employ Jaffe Raitt as Counsel
STURGIS IRON: Court Approves Kurtzman Carson as Claims Agent
SUMMERWIND INVESTORS: Taps Goe & Forsythe as Bankruptcy Counsel
SUNCREST LLC: Bankruptcy Filing Follows Receipt of Default Notice
SUNCREST LLC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

SUN-TIMES MEDIA: Fails to Meet NYSE Continued Listing Standards
SVI HOSPITALITY: Case Summary & 13 Largest Unsecured Creditors
SYNTAX-BRILLIAN: Picks Greg Rayburn as Interim COO
TARRAGON CORP: Grant Thornton Expresses Going Concern Doubt
TELEGEN CORP: Peterson Sullivan Expresses Going Concern Doubt

TELEPLUS WORLD: PKF CPA Expresses Going Concern Doubt
THOMPSON PRODUCTS: Can Obtain $3 Mil. DIP Financing from CIT Group
TONY'S MULTI-SERVICE: Case Summary & 19 Largest Unsec. Creditors
TOURMALINE CDO: Poor Credit Quality Cues Moody's 11 Junk Ratings
TRAILER BRIDGE: S&P Keeps 'B-' Ratings on Highly Leveraged Profile

TROPIC ISLE: Case Summary & 16 Largest Unsecured Creditors
TYCO INT'L: Inks Initial Deal to Settle $3BB Debt Securities Suit
UNIPROP MANUFACTURED: BDO Seidman Expresses Going Concern Doubt
UNIVISION COMM: Borrows $700 Million to Pay Down Bridge Loan
UNIVISION COMMS: $700M Borrowing Has No Impact on S&P's Ratings

VALEANT PHARMA: Board of Directors Approves Strategic Plan
VICTORY MEMORIAL: Has Until May 15 to File Chapter 11 Plan
WACHOVIA CORP: Could Unveil $7BB Recapitalization Today, WSJ Says
WHX CORP: Appoints Peter Gelfman as General Counsel and Secretary
ZAIS INVESTMENT: Eroding Credit Quality Cues Moody's Rating Cuts

* S&P Cuts 17 Tranches' Ratings From Five Cash Flows and CDOs
* S&P Says Banks Focused On Real Estate Face Challenges Ahead
* Surge In Defaults Foreseen By S&P Credit Ratings And Research
* S&P Reports Oil Price Hike Strikes Transportation Sector Hard

* Three Partners Join Proskauer Rose's Newly Opened Chicago Unit

* BOND PRICING: For the Week of Apr. 7 - Apr. 11, 2008

                             *********

4S DEVELOPMENT: Gets Court OK to Employ Theune Law as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado
gave authority to 4S Development Ltd, LLLP to employ Theune Law
Offices, PC, as its counsel.

Theune Law is expected to:

     a) provide the Debtor with legal counsel with respect to its
        powers and duties as Debtor and debtor-in-possession;

     b) prepare on behalf of the Debtor necessary applications,
        complaints, answers, motions, reports and other legal
        papers, and represent the Debtor in negotiations and at
        all hearings in this case and related proceedings;

     c) assist the Debtor in the preparation and confirmation of a
        Chapter 11 disclosure statement and plan, if appropriate;
        and

     d) perform other legal services for the Debtor, which may be
        necessary herein.

The firm will charge the Debtor $275 per hour for services
rendered.  A $10,000 retainer has been paid by the Debtor to the
firm.  A $1,921 balance is being held in the firm's COLTAF
account.

To the best of the Debtor's knowledge, the firm holds no interest
adverse to the Debtor and its estates and is "disinterested" as
that term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Theune Law Offices, P.C.
     1763 Franklin Street
     Denver, CO 80218-1124
     Tel: (303) 832-1150
     Fax: (303) 845-6934
     inbox@TheuneLaw.com

4S Development Ltd, LLP is a real estate developer headquartered
in Hayden, Colorado.  The company filed for Chapter 11 protection
on Feb. 26, 2008 (Bankr.D.Co. Case No. 08-12162).  Philipp C.
Theune, Esq. at Theune Law Offices, P.C. represents the Debtor in
its restructuring effort.  When the Debtor filed for protection
from its creditors it listed total assets of $75,825,498 and total
liabilities of $5,684,487.


AAAAA ENTERPRISES: Case Summary & 19 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: AAAAA Enterprises, Inc.
        7348 North Central Highway 222E
        Stantonsburg, NC 27883

Bankruptcy Case No.: 08-02291

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 4, 2008

Court: Eastern District of North Carolina

Judge: Randy D. Doub

Debtor's Counsel: N. Hunter Wyche, Jr., Esq.
                     (hwyche@wilsonandratledge.com)
                  Wilson & Ratledge, PLLC
                  4600 Marriott Drive, Suite 400
                  Raleigh, NC 27612
                  Tel: (919) 787-7711
                  Fax: (919) 787-7710
                  http://www.wilsonandratledge.com/

Estimated Assets: $1 million and $10 million

Estimated Debts:  $1 million and $10 million

Debtor's 19 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                      Nature of Claim       Claim Amount
   ------                      ---------------       ------------
Heely-Brown Co., Inc.          Roofing materials     $255,479
P.O. Box 930757
Atlanta, GA 31193-0757

Phoenix Sales, Inc.            Trade supplies        $130,375
3100 Pennington Drive
Orlando, FL 32804

Duro-Last Roofing, Inc.        Roofing material      $123,471
525 Morley Drive
Saginaw, MI 48601

Department of Financial        Workers'              $81,478
Services                       compensation

N.B. Handy                     Roofing materials     $73,582

ABC Supply Co., Inc.           Trade supplies        $62,686

Best Distributing Co.          Roofing materials     $61,099

Premier Industries, Inc.       Trade supplies        $60,320

Citi Gold Advantage Card       Trade supplies        $33,615

Bank of America                Trade supplies        $25,823
Wilmington, DE

Roofing Tools & Equipment Co., Tools                 $22,335
Inc.

AmEx Delta                     Trade supplies        $16,870

Roofers Supply of Greenville   Roofing materials     $12,740

Bradco Supply Corp.            Sheet metal           $10,839

Bank of America                Trade supplies        $10,645
Greensboro, NC

Discover More Card             Trade supplies        $10,515

Berridge Manufacturing Co.     Trade supplies        $8,850

Citgo                          Fuel (open account)   $7,992

United Rentals                 Rental                $7,620


ACACIA CDO: Moody's Reviews 'Ba1' Rating on $11.5 Million Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed on review for possible downgrade
the ratings on these notes issued by Acacia CDO 12, Ltd.:

Class Description: $291,500,000 Class A-1 First Priority Senior
Secured Floating Rate Notes Due 2047

  -- Prior Rating: Aaa
  -- Current Rating: Aaa, on review for possible downgrade

Moody's also downgraded and left on review for possible further
downgrade the ratings on these notes:

Class Description: $100,000,000 Class A-2 Second Priority Senior
Secured Floating Rate Notes Due 2047

  -- Prior Rating: Aaa
  -- Current Rating: Aa2, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $41,000,000 Class B Third Priority Senior
Secured Floating Rate Notes Due 2047

  -- Prior Rating: Aa2
  -- Current Rating: A1, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $14,000,000 Class C Fourth Priority Mezzanine
Secured Floating Rate Deferrable Interest Notes Due 2047

  -- Prior Rating: A2
  -- Current Rating: Baa1, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $11,500,000 Class D Fifth Priority Mezzanine
Secured Floating Rate Deferrable Interest Notes 2047

  -- Prior Rating: Baa2
  -- Current Rating: Ba1, on review for possible downgrade

According to Moody's, the rating actions reflect increased
deterioration in the credit quality of the underlying portfolio.


ACACIA OPTION: Moody's Reviews 'Ba1' Rating for Possible Downgrade
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed on review for possible downgrade
the ratings on these notes issued by Acacia Option ARM 1 CDO, Ltd.

Class Description: $380,000,000 Class A1S First Priority Senior
Secured Floating Rate Notes Due 2052

  -- Prior Rating: Aaa
  -- Current Rating: Aaa, on review for possible downgrade

Moody's also downgraded and left on review for possible further
downgrade the ratings on these notes:

Class Description: $40,000,000 Class A1J Second Priority Senior
Secured Floating Rate Notes Due 2052

  -- Prior Rating: Aaa
  -- Current Rating: Aa2, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $34,000,000 Class A2 Third Priority Senior
Secured Floating Rate Notes Due 2052

  -- Prior Rating: Aa2
  -- Current Rating: A1, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $16,000,000 Class A3 Fourth Priority Senior
Secured Floating Rate Deferrable Interest Notes Due 2052

  -- Prior Rating: A2
  -- Current Rating: Baa1, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $16,000,000 Class B Fifth Priority Mezzanine
Secured Floating Rate Deferrable Interest Notes Due 2052

  -- Prior Rating: Baa2
  -- Current Rating: Ba1, on review for possible downgrade

According to Moody's, the rating actions reflect increased
deterioration in the credit quality of the underlying portfolio.


ACCELLENT INC: Board Appoints Craig Campbell as Controller
----------------------------------------------------------
On April 8, 2008, the Board of Directors of Accellent Inc.  
appointed Craig C. Campbell, 38, as vice president, controller and
chief accounting officer of the company, effective April 28, 2008.

Mr. Campbell most recently was vice president finance and
corporate controller for NaviSite Inc., a publicly traded provider
of internet hosting and outsourcing services, from April 2007 to
April 2008.  From October 2003 to April 2007, Mr. Campbell was a
managing director for Zimmerman & Co. LLC, a firm providing
Sarbanes-Oxley outsourcing services and technical accounting
advisory services for publicly traded companies.  

Prior to joining Zimmerman & Co. LLC, Mr. Campbell was controller,
secretary and treasurer for Coriolis Networks Inc., a company that
designed, developed and manufactured integrated optical networking
systems, from March 2000 to March 2003.  Mr. Campbell is a
Certified Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Business
Administration in Accounting from the University of Massachusetts
at Amherst.

                       About Accellent Inc.

Headquartered in Wilmington, Massachussetts, Accellent Inc. --  
http://www.accellent.com/-- provides fully integrated outsourced  
manufacturing and engineering services to the medical device
industry in the cardiology, endoscopy, drug delivery, neurology
and orthopaedic markets.  

At Dec. 31, 2007, the company's consolidated balance sheet showed
$1.122 billion in total assets, $810.4 million in total
liabilities, and $312.0 million in total stockholders' equity.

                          *     *    *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Dec. 12, 2007,
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Accellent Inc.'s corporate
family rating to Caa1 from B3 and assigned a negative outlook.  At
the same time, Moody's downgraded these ratings: (i) secured
revolver to B2 (LGD2, 29%) from B1 (LGD2, 29%); (ii) secured term
loan to B2 (LGD2, 29%) from B1 (LGD2, 29%); (iii) sr. subordinated
notes to Caa3 (LGD5, 83%) from Caa2 (LGD5, 83%); (iv) PDR to Caa1
from B3; and speculative grade liquidity rating to SGL-4 from
SGL-3.


ACE SECURITIES: 35 Tranches From Six Deals Get Moody's Rating Cuts
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded 35 tranches from 6 deals
issued by ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust in 2004.  
The transactions are backed by primarily first-lien, subprime
fixed and adjustable rate mortgage loans.

The actions are based on the analysis of the credit enhancement
provided by subordination, overcollateralization and excess spread
relative to expected losses.

Complete rating actions are:

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2004-HE1

  -- Cl. M-3, downgraded from A3 to Baa2
  -- Cl. M-4, downgraded from Baa3 to B3
  -- Cl. M-5, downgraded from B1 to Ca
  -- Cl. M-6, downgraded from Caa2 to C

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2004-HE2

  -- Cl. M-3, downgraded from A3 to Baa2
  -- Cl. M-4, downgraded from Baa1 to Ba1
  -- Cl. M-5, downgraded from Baa2 to Ba3
  -- Cl. M-6, downgraded from Baa3 to B3
  -- Cl. B-1, downgraded from Ba2 to Ca

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2004-HE3

  -- Cl. M-3, downgraded from Aa3 to A3
  -- Cl. M-4, downgraded from A1 to Baa2
  -- Cl. M-5, downgraded from A2 to Baa3
  -- Cl. M-6, downgraded from A3 to Ba2
  -- Cl. M-7, downgraded from Baa1 to B2
  -- Cl. M-8, downgraded from Baa2 to Caa2

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2004-HE4

  -- Cl. M-3, downgraded from Aa3 to A2
  -- Cl. M-4, downgraded from A1 to Baa1
  -- Cl. M-5, downgraded from A2 to Baa2
  -- Cl. M-6, downgraded from A3 to Ba1
  -- Cl. M-7, downgraded from Baa1 to Ba3
  -- Cl. M-8, downgraded from Baa2 to B3
  -- Cl. M-9, downgraded from Baa3 to Ca

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2004-HS1

  -- Cl. M-1, downgraded from Aa2 to A1
  -- Cl. M-2, downgraded from A2 to Baa3
  -- Cl. M-3, downgraded from A3 to Ba3
  -- Cl. M-4, downgraded from Baa1 to B2
  -- Cl. M-5, downgraded from Ba2 to Ca
  -- Cl. M-6, downgraded from B1 to C

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2004-RM2

  -- Cl. M-4, downgraded from A1 to A3
  -- Cl. M-5, downgraded from A2 to Baa1
  -- Cl. M-6, downgraded from A3 to Baa3
  -- Cl. M-7, downgraded from Baa1 to Ba1
  -- Cl. B-1, downgraded from Baa2 to B1
  -- Cl. B-2, downgraded from Baa3 to Caa1
  -- Cl. B-3, downgraded from Ba1 to Ca


ADVANCED CELL: Files Amended Disclosure on "2008 Financing"
-----------------------------------------------------------
Advanced Cell Technology Inc. filed on Form 8-K/A an amendment to
its Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the company on April 1,
2008.

In the Form 8-K, Advanced Cell closed on March 31, 2008, on the
issuance of $3,823,145 of its amortizing senior secured
convertible debentures and associated warrants -- 2008 Financing.

Due to additional investments made in the company prior to the
release of the closing escrow, the aggregate purchase price for
the debentures purchased at the 2008 Financing, including in-kind
payments and refinancing of bridge debt incurred in anticipation
of the financing, was increased to $3,218,231 and the cash
purchase price excluding refinancing of bridge debt and in-kind
payments was increased to $2,527,231.

The company's obligations to the purchasers in the 2008 Financing
are secured by a senior security interest and lien granted upon
all company assets pursuant to the terms of a Security Agreement
entered into in connection with the closing.  The security
interest granted under the Security Agreement and the company's
obligations relating thereto are pari passu with the company's
obligations to the holders of debentures in the company's existing
2005, 2006 and 2007 debenture financings.

A full-text copy of the Form 8-K dated April 1, 2008, is available
for free at http://researcharchives.com/t/s?2a73

                About Advanced Cell Technology Inc.

Headquartered in Alameda, California, Advanced Cell Technology
Inc. (OTCBB:ACTC) -- http://www.advancedcell.com/-- is a      
biotechnology company focused on developing and commercializing
human stem cell technology in the emerging field of regenerative
medicine.  It has developed and maintained a portfolio of patents
and patent applications that form the proprietary base for its
embryonic stem cell research and development.  The company
operates facilities in Alameda, California and Worcester,
Massachusetts.

At Sept. 30, 2007, the company's consolidated balance sheet showed
$15.6 million in total assets and $42.1 million in total
liabilities, resulting in a $26.5 million total stockholders'
deficit.

                          *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on March 26, 2007,
Stonefield Josephson Inc. in Los Angeles, California, expressed
substantial doubt about Advanced Cell Technology Inc.'s ability to
continue as a going concern after auditing the company's
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31,
2006.  The auditing firm pointed to the company's minimal sources
of revenue, substantial losses, substantial monetary liabilities
in excess of monetary assets and accumulated deficits as of
Dec. 31, 2006.


ADVANCED MICRO: Acquires Beteiligungs Interests in AMD FAB 36 KG
----------------------------------------------------------------
On April 1, 2008, AMD Fab 36 Holding GmbH, a German company and
wholly owned subsidiary of Advanced Micro Devices Inc., and AMD
Fab 36 Admin GmbH, a German company and wholly owned subsidiary of
AMD Fab 36 Holding, purchased the limited partnership interests
and silent partnership interests in AMD Fab 36 Limited Liability
Company & Co. KG, an indirect subsidiary of the company, held by
Fab 36 Beteiligungs GmbH & Co. KG, an investment consortium
arranged by M+W Zander Facility Engineering GmbH.

The purchase is pursuant to their call option provided under the
partnership agreements and participation purchase agreements
entered into on April 21, 2004, as amended, among AMD Fab 36 KG,
AMD Fab 36 LLC, a Delaware company being the general partner of
AMD FAB 36 KG and a wholly owned subsidiary of the company, AMD
Fab 36 Holding, AMD Fab 36 Admin and the unaffiliated limited
partners, Leipziger Messe GmbH and Fab 36 Beteiligungs.

The aggregate purchase price paid to Fab 36 Beteiligungs pursuant
to the call options is approximately EUR86 million (or
$132.4 million based on the euro to dollar exchange rate on
March 25, 2008).

                       About Advanced Micro

Headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, Advanced Micro Devices
Inc. (NYSE: AMD) -- http://www.amd.com/-- provides innovative
processing solutions in the computing, graphics and consumer
electronics markets.

At Dec. 29, 2007, the company's consolidated balance sheet showed
$11.550 billion in total assets, $8.295 billion in total
liabilities, $265.0 million in minority interest in consolidated
subsidiaries, and $2.990 billion in total stockholders' equity.

                          *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 28, 2008,
Fitch downgraded these ratings on Advanced Micro Devices Inc.,
including its Issuer Default Rating to 'B-' from 'B'; and its
Senior unsecured debt to 'CCC'/RR6 from 'CCC+/RR6'.  The Rating
Outlook remains Negative.


AIRBORNE HEALTH: S&P Gives Negative Outlook; Holds 'CCC+' Rating
----------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services revised its outlook on Bonita
Springs, Florida based Airborne Health Inc. to negative from
developing.  At the same time, Standard & Poor's affirmed all of
its ratings on the company, including its 'CCC+' corporate credit
rating.  About $154 million total debt was outstanding at Jan. 31,
2008.
     
"The outlook revision reflects Airborne's delay in requesting an
amendment to its credit facility due to violation of its financial
covenants for the quarter ended Jan. 31, 2008, and continued weak
operating performance," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Bea
Chiem.
     
The company currently does not have access to its $20 million
revolver and is operating under a technical default.  Also, the
company did not exercise its equity cure provision under the
senior secured credit agreement within 10 days from delivery of
its compliance certificate for the quarter ended Jan. 31, 2008.   
"While lenders have not requested an accelerated payment on the
term loan, we are concerned about their ability to exercise their
rights and remedies over the near term," said Ms. Chiem.
     
Airborne continues to experience weak operating performance from
unseasonably warm weather during the peak cold weather season that
lowered demand for preventative products, and leverage is very
high.
     
"We are concerned about the company's ability to maintain adequate
liquidity given its lack of access to its revolver, continued weak
performance, and recent negative publicity surrounding the
$23 million settlement of a class action lawsuit that challenged
the product's advertising claims," said Ms. Chiem.  Presently,
Airborne's liquidity is sufficient to support operations over the
near term.


ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS: S&P Holds Negative CreditWatch on 'BB' Rating
------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said its ratings, including the
'BB' corporate credit rating, on Alliant Techsystems Inc., remain
on CreditWatch with negative implications, where they were placed
on Jan. 9, 2008.  The CreditWatch update follows the announcement
that the Canadian regulatory authorities rejected the Edina,
Minnesota-based company's planned $1.3 billion acquisition of two
divisions of MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd.
      
"The CreditWatch reflects expectations of higher leverage if the
acquisition closes as currently structured," said Standard &
Poor's credit analyst Christopher DeNicolo.  Under Canada's
foreign investment review law, ATK has 30 days to provide
additional information or to restructure the deal to address the
government's concerns.  MDA owns and operates the Radarsat-2
remote-sensing satellite, which provides surveillance of Canada's
arctic regions.  Some Canadian officials are concerned that if MDA
is owned by a U.S. company, the U.S. government could restrict
Canada's access to the data from Radarsat-2, although this is not
the only issue.
     
The debt-financed acquisition will result in pro forma adjusted
debt to EBITDA increasing to above 4.5x from about 3x expected for
ATK standalone in fiscal 2008 (ending March 30, 2008).  The
acquired units, Information Systems and Geospatial Information
Services, have about $500 million in sales and produce satellites
and related components, ground stations, robotics used in space
exploration, as well as processing and distributing satellite
imagery, complementing ATK's existing space operations.  The
transaction is subject to U.S. and Canadian regulatory approvals,
as well as approval by MDA's shareholders, and was expected to
close by June 2008.  Standard & Poor's will monitor the regulatory
approval process, and if resolved favorably, meet with management
to discuss financing plans and financial policy to determine the
impact on the ratings.
     
ATK is the leading manufacturer of solid rocket motors for space-
launch vehicles and strategic missiles and is second in the market
for tactical missiles.  In addition, the firm is the largest
provider of small-caliber ammunition to the U.S. military and has
strong positions in tank and other types of ammunition.


ALOHA AIRLINES: Gets Initial OK to Access GMAC's $3 Mil. Facility
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Lloyd King of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Hawaii authorized Aloha Airlines Inc. and its debtor-
affiliates to obtain, on an interim basis, up to $3,000,000 in
postpetition financing under a revolving credit facility with GMAC
Commercial Finance LLC, as lender and administrative agent.

The Debtors need the money to fund their estates through the sale
of their air cargo assets.

Interim access to the lenders' DIP facility will terminate on
April 25, 2008.  Judge King will convene a hearing on that date to
consider final approval of the Debtors' request.

As of March 19, 2008, the Debtors owed their prepetition lenders
$44,075,000 in loans and $4,925,000 in letters of credit --
exclusive of interest and fees accrued.

Specifically, the Debtors will use the money to:

   -- fund working capital to preserve the value of certain of the
      Debtors' business segments during the Chapter 11 cases;

   -- pay fees, expenses owed to the lender under the financing
      agreement;

   -- pay fees, costs, expenses and disbursements of professionals
      to the Debtors and the Official Committee of Unsecured
      Creditors; and

   -- pay other bankruptcy related charges, including U.S. Trustee
      of Court and clerk fees.

The DIP Loan will incur interest at 1.75% over the applicable
prepetition, default rate or 6.5% over the prime rate.

To secure the Debtors' DIP obligations, the lenders will be
granted superiority administrative expense status, with priority
over all administrative expenses of and unsecured claims against
the Debtors under Section 364(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The DIP lien is subject to a carve-out for payments to
professionals to the Debtors, any statutory committee appointed in  
these cases and U.S. Trustee of Court fees.  There is a $150,000
carve-out for the Debtors' counsel, $100,000 carve-out for the
committee's professionals and $250,000 carve-out for trustee fees.

                      About Aloha Airlines

Based in Honolulu, Hawaii, Aloha Airgroup Inc., Aloha Airlines
Inc. -- http://www.alohaairlines.com/-- and its affiliates are     
carriers that fly passengers and freight to Hawaii's five major
airports, as well as to half a dozen destinations in the western
U.S.  They operate a fleet of about 20 aircraft, all Boeing 737s,
including three configured as freighters.

This is the airline's second bankruptcy filing.  Aloha filed for
Chapter 11 protection on Dec. 30, 2004 (Bankr. D. Hawaii Case No.
04-03063), and emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in
February 2006.

The company and its affiliates filed again for Chapter 11
protection on March 18, 2008 (Bankr. D. Hawaii Lead Case No. 08-
00337).  Brian G. Rich, Esq., Jordi Guso, Esq., and Paul Steven
Singerman, Esq., at Berger Singerman P.A., and David C. Farmer,
Esq., represent the Debtors in their restructuring efforts.  When
the Debtors filed for protection from their creditors, they listed
estimated assets and debts of $100 million to $500 million.


AMERICAN AIRLINES: Cancellations Won't Affect S&P's 'B' Rating
--------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said that it does not expect
American Airlines Inc.'s (B/Negative/--) widespread flight
cancellations to have an impact on its ratings on American or
parent AMR Corp. (B/Negative/B-3), unless the disruptions are
prolonged or more serious.  S&P revised its outlook on AMR and
American to negative from positive, and lowered its short-term
rating on AMR to 'B-3' from 'B-2' on March 24, 2008.  Still, AMR
is likely to suffer a noticeable financial impact in the second
quarter, mostly because of lost revenue and the cost of rebooking
delayed passengers.  

The scale of the cancellations is beyond what would be caused by
major storms affecting an airline's hub, the most nearly
comparable situation.  Further, American is providing more
assistance, in the form of travel vouchers, overnight
accommodations, etc., than it might in the case of weather-related
cancellations.  Major storms affecting hubs have sometimes hurt
earnings up to $20 million to $30 million, but the damage in this
case will likely be worse.  Perhaps the only factors working in
American's favor are that its competitors' planes are already so
crowded that it is not possible to book many passengers on other
airlines, and American is not the first airline recently to have
cancellations and a public relations problem related to
maintenance.
     
A longer-term issue, which will affect all of the U.S. airlines,
is that these persistent operational problems at multiple carriers
may make them more wary of raising fares further to offset very
high fuel prices.  It only takes one large airline to block an
attempted general fare increase by not matching higher ticket
prices, and American (and possibly other airlines) may be hesitant
to raise prices on the heels of such well-publicized problems.  
The timing of these problems is unfortunate, as air travel demand
is likely to be softer than last year, due to the very weak
economy, and very high fuel prices are adding billions of dollars
to airlines' expenses.


AMERICAN AXLE: Inks Contract Pacts with Unions in Mexico and UK
---------------------------------------------------------------
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings Inc. reached agreements
with the unions representing its associates in England, Mexico and
Scotland.
        
"All of AAM's hourly associates at AAM de Mexico and our wholly-
owned subsidiary Albion Automotive in the United Kingdom have
union representation," AAM Co-Founder, Chairman & CEO Richard E.
Dauch said.  "The recently signed agreements in Mexico and the
United Kingdom achieved a market competitive labor cost structure
in those regions where the facilities are located. This was all
done quietly, professionally, responsibly and effectively with no
production disruption."

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on April 11, 2008,
negotiators representing AAM and the UAW met at the bargaining
table for the first time in over three weeks on April 9, 2008.  At
this meeting, the UAW presented a new economic proposal to AAM.

Although it was a slight improvement from the UAW's previous
bargaining positions, the all-in labor cost proposed by the UAW is
still approximately 200% of the market rate of AAM's competitors
in the United States automotive supply industry.

AAM expressed disappointment over the UAW's failure to make
proposals that address the competitive reality AAM and its UAW-
represented associates jointly face in the U.S. driveline
marketplace.

AAM needs a structural change in labor costs at its original U.S.
locations that is comparable to the agreements the UAW has
previously made with AAM's competitors in the United States
automotive supply industry.  If the UAW continues to refuse to
make realistic economic proposals, AAM will be forced to consider
closing these facilities.

AAM has no desire to close the original U.S. locations. AAM's
preferred approach is to reach an agreement with the UAW on a new
U.S. market competitive labor cost structure for these facilities.  
If such a market competitive agreement is accomplished, these
facilities will be able to bid competitively for new business and
AAM will be able to continue investing in these operations.

AAM has offered generous buy-outs for associates who do not wish
to continue to work for AAM subject to a competitive wage and
benefits package.  AAM has also offered to make annual buy-down
cash payments to associates who accept a competitive wage and
benefits package.  AAM's proposed buy-outs and buy-downs will
provide its associates and families a financial cushion and soft
landing during the transition to a new U.S. market competitive
labor cost structure.  These proposals are similar to those that
have been successfully used by Chrysler, Ford, GM and Delphi in
recent agreements with the UAW.

Negotiations are continuing.  AAM remains hopeful that the
International UAW will soon put forward economic and operating
proposals that will allow AAM to compete on a level playing field
with its competitors in the United States automotive supply
industry and maintain its manufacturing operations in the original
U.S. locations.

Headquartered in Detroit, Michigan, American Axle & Manufacturing
Holdings Inc. (NYSE:AXL) -- http://www.aam.com/-- and its
wholly owned subsidiary, American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.,
manufactures, engineers, designs and validates driveline and
drivetrain systems and related components and modules, chassis
systems and metal-formed products for light trucks, sport utility
vehicles and passenger cars.  In addition to locations in the
United States (in Michigan, New York and Ohio), the company also
has offices or facilities in Brazil, China, Germany, India, Japan,
Luxembourg, Mexico, Poland, South Korea and the United Kingdom.

                          *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on April 4, 2008,
Moody's Investors Service placed American Axle & Manufacturing
Holdings, Inc.'s Ba3 Corporate Family Rating under review for
downgrade.  

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Nov. 27, 2007,
Moody's Investors Service affirmed American Axle & Manufacturing
Holdings, Inc.'s Corporate Family rating of Ba3 as well its
senior unsecured rating of Ba3 to American Axle & Manufacturing
Inc.'s notes and term loan.


AMERICAN AXLE: UAW Rejects Assistance of Federal Mediator
---------------------------------------------------------
The strike called by the International United Auto Workers union
at American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings Inc.'s original U.S.
locations continues into its 47th day.  Approximately 3,650
associates are represented by the UAW at five facilities in
Michigan and New York.

With the objective of reaching a compromise agreement, Axle
requested the Federal Mediator assigned by the Federal Mediation &
Conciliation Service to assist in the company's ongoing
negotiations with the UAW.  Axle had hoped that the involvement of
an impartial third party at the bargaining table could assist both
sides.  The UAW refused to allow the Federal Mediator to help the
parties reach agreement.  Axle was disappointed in the UAW's
decision.

"While the UAW had conversations with a representative of the
Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, it was concluded that
a mediator could add little to the process at this juncture; in
fact, it would place the mediator in a no-win situation," UAW
President Ron Gettelfinger said.  "Throughout these negotiations,
the UAW has repeatedly offered responsible proposals and counter-
proposals to Axle in an attempt to bring a conclusion to
bargaining."

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on April 11, 2008,
negotiators representing AAM and the UAW met at the bargaining
table for the first time in over three weeks on April 9, 2008.  At
this meeting, the UAW presented a new economic proposal to Axle.

Although it was a slight improvement from the UAW's previous
bargaining positions, the all-in labor cost proposed by the UAW is
still approximately 200% of the market rate of Axle's competitors
in the United States automotive supply industry.

Axle expressed disappointment over the UAW's failure to make
proposals that address the competitive reality Axle and its UAW-
represented associates jointly face in the U.S. driveline
marketplace.

Axle needs a structural change in labor costs at its original U.S.
locations that is comparable to the agreements the UAW has
previously made with Axle's competitors in the United States
automotive supply industry.  If the UAW continues to refuse to
make realistic economic proposals, Axle will be forced to consider
closing these facilities.

Axle has no desire to close the original U.S. locations.  Axle's
preferred approach is to reach an agreement with the UAW on a new
U.S. market competitive labor cost structure for these facilities.  
If such a market competitive agreement is accomplished, these
facilities will be able to bid competitively for new business and
Axle will be able to continue investing in these operations.

Axle has offered generous buy-outs for associates who do not wish
to continue to work for Axle subject to a competitive wage and
benefits package.  Axle has also offered to make annual buy-down
cash payments to associates who accept a competitive wage and
benefits package.  Axle's proposed buy-outs and buy-downs will
provide its associates and families a financial cushion and soft
landing during the transition to a new U.S. market competitive
labor cost structure.  These proposals are similar to those that
have been successfully used by Chrysler, Ford, GM and Delphi in
recent agreements with the UAW.

Negotiations are continuing.  Axle remains hopeful that the
International UAW will soon put forward economic and operating
proposals that will allow Axle to compete on a level playing field
with its competitors in the United States automotive supply
industry and maintain its manufacturing operations in the original
U.S. locations.

                    Strike Impact on Automakers

GM has about 30 facilities affected by the strike at Axle as the
supplier attempts to negotiate with the union.

Chrysler LLC is temporarily closing its vehicle assembly facility
in Newark, Delaware as the strike among UAW union members at AAM  
stretches.  AAM supplies Chrysler components for the Dodge Durango
and Chrysler Aspen sport utility vehicles in Newark and two
versions of the Dodge Ram pickup made in Saltillo, Mexico.

                            About Axle

Headquartered in Detroit, Michigan, American Axle & Manufacturing
Holdings Inc. (NYSE:AXL) -- http://www.aam.com/-- and its
wholly owned subsidiary, American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.,
manufactures, engineers, designs and validates driveline and
drivetrain systems and related components and modules, chassis
systems and metal-formed products for light trucks, sport utility
vehicles and passenger cars.  In addition to locations in the
United States (in Michigan, New York and Ohio), the company also
has offices or facilities in Brazil, China, Germany, India, Japan,
Luxembourg, Mexico, Poland, South Korea and the United Kingdom.

                          *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on April 4, 2008,
Moody's Investors Service placed American Axle & Manufacturing
Holdings, Inc.'s Ba3 Corporate Family Rating under review for
downgrade.  

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Nov. 27, 2007,
Moody's Investors Service affirmed American Axle & Manufacturing
Holdings, Inc.'s Corporate Family rating of Ba3 as well its
senior unsecured rating of Ba3 to American Axle & Manufacturing
Inc.'s notes and term loan.  At the same time, the rating agency
revised the rating outlook to stable from negative.


AMP'D MOBILE: Court OKs Protocol for Settling Preference Claims
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon authorized Amp'd Mobile, Inc., to
settle preference claims without the need for any further notice,
hearing or Court order, in instances where the total gross does
not exceed $25,000.

To the extent the Debtor desires to settle Preference Claims where
the total gross settlement amount ranges from $25,000 to
$100,000, the Debtor will serve a notice of the proposed
settlement.

Any Proposed Settlement involving a claim where the total gross
exceeds $100,000 or any Proposed Settlement with an insider will
require the filing of an appropriate motion under Rule 9019 of the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on February 11, 2008,
Amp'd Mobile informed the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware that its estate possesses roughly 200 preferential
claims under Sections 547 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code.

If the Debtor is required to seek the court approval to serve
notice on all interested parties whenever the Debtor resolves a
preference claim, the expense to the estate and the demand on the
Court's time will be considerable, Steven M. Yoder, Esq., at
Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, in Wilmington, Delaware, said.

The list of parties upon which the Debtor propose to serve
notices of certain proposed settlements are:

   * the U.S. Trustee,
   * counsel for the Unsecured Creditors' Committee,
   * general bankruptcy counsel for the Debtor, and
   * counsel for Kings Road Investment Ltd.

The Settlement Notice will include:

   * the amount of the Preference Claim;

   * the name of the party against whom the Claim has been
     asserted;

   * the dates of the payments in question;

   * the terms of the Proposed Settlement;

   * any asserted defenses to the Preference Claim; and

   * explanation for the Proposed Settlement.

Interested Parties will have 15 days from the date of the
Settlement Notice to object to the Proposed Settlement.  If no
objections are filed and served properly prior to the expiration
of the Notice Period, the Proposed Settlement will be deemed
approved by the Court without further notice and hearing.  
Moreover, the Debtor will be authorized to consummate the
Proposed Settlement.

Any objection to a Proposed Settlement must:

   (i) be in writing,

  (ii) state with specificity the ground for objection,

(iii) be served on the Interested Parties and special counsel to
       the Debtor so as to be received prior to the expiration of
       the Notice Period, and

  (iv) be filed with the Court prior to the expiration of the
       Notice Period.

If an objection to a Proposed Settlement is properly filed and
served, then the Proposed Settlement may not proceed absent:

   (i) withdrawal of the objection; or

  (ii) entry of an order of the Court specifically approving the
       Proposed Settlement.

If the parties are unable to resolve the objection, either of
them will ask the Court to hold a hearing considering the
Proposed Settlement.  At least 10 days prior to the hearing, the
objecting party of the Debtor must file a notice of hearing with
the Court, serving the notice to the Interested Parties and
special counsel for the Debtor.

Moreover, on or before the 15th day of each month, the Debtor
will provide to the Interest Parties a report describing the
final disposition of all Preference Claims settled in the
previous calendar month.  The Monthly Settlement Report will
identify:

   (i) the party against whom the claim was asserted,

  (ii) the amount of the Preference Claim, and

(iii) the settlement amount.

                      About Amp'd Mobile Inc.

Headquartered in Los Angeles, California, Amp'd Mobile Inc. aka
Amp'D Mobile LLC -- http://www.ampd.com/-- is a mobile virtual  
network operator that provides voice, text and entertainment
content to subscribers who contract for cellular telephone
service. The company filed for chapter 11 protection on June 1,
2007 (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 07-10739). Steven M. Yoder, Esq.,
Eric M. Sutty, Esq. and Mary E. Augustine, Esq. at The Bayard Firm
represent the Debtor in its restructuring efforts.  Attorneys at
Otterbourg, Steindler, Houston & Rosen, P.C. and Klehr, Harrison,
Harvey, Branzburg & Ellers, LLP, represent the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.  In its schedules filed with the Court,
the Debtor listed total assets of $47,603,629 and total debts of
$164, 569,842.  The Debtor's exclusive period to file a plan
expired on Sept. 29, 2007.  (Amp'd Mobile Bankruptcy News, Issue
No. 24; Bankruptcy Creditors' Services Inc.
http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).


AMP'D MOBILE: Settles Preference Suit with Motorola, et al.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Prior to its bankruptcy filing, Amp'd Mobile, Inc., transferred
certain amounts to five entities:

   Transferee                        Amount Transferred
   ----------                        -----------------
   Sitel Operating Corporation           $2,063,689
   Motorola, Inc.                         1,528,515
   The Platform, Inc.                       277,700
   Hyperlink, Inc.                          206,185
   Schematic, Inc.                          169,230

The Debtor believes that a portion of the transfers it made to
Sitel, et al. are subject to avoidance under Sections 547 and 548
of the Bankruptcy Code.  Thereafter, the Debtor demanded the
return of the subject payments made to the Transferees.

In an effort to avoid further delay and the substantial fees,
risks, and costs associated with continued litigation, the Debtor
and the Transferees engaged in arm's length negotiations to
resolve various issues between them.  Ultimately, the parties
reached agreements to settle their disputes with respect to the
alleged preferential transfers:

   * The Debtor and Motorola have agreed, inter alia, that
     Motorola will pay $1,000,000 to the Debtor.  In the event
     Motorola fails to pay the Settlement Amount, the Debtor will
     be entitled to $1,100,000 plus interest until the date of
     payment in full.  Upon payment of the Settlement Amount or
     the Enhanced Settlement Amount, Motorola's $52,000,000 claim
     will be allowed as a general unsecured claim without further
     action required on the part of Motorola.

   * The Debtor and Sitel have agreed that Sitel will pay
     $477,000 to the Debtor, and will waive its $73,000
     administrative expense claim.  Sitel will be granted
     immediate relief from the automatic stay provisions of
     Section 362 of the bankruptcy Code, as the provisions relate
     to a $206,000 deposit held by Sitel.  Sitel will be
     permitted to immediately set off and apply the Deposit to
     its prepetition claims against the Debtor.

   * The Debtor and Schematic have agreed that Schematic will pay
     $35,000 to the Debtor.

   * The Debtor and Platform Inc. have agreed that Platform Inc.
     will waive its administrative expense claim for $26,000.

   * Hyperlink has demonstrated to counsel for the Debtor that it
     provided new value in an amount approximately equal to or in
     excess of the transfers at issue.  Consequently, the Debtor
     has agreed to voluntarily dismiss the Hyperlink adversary
     proceeding without prejudice.

At the Debtor's behest, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approves the
settlement agreements with respect to the Preference Transfers.

Separately, the Debtor and Asurion Insurance Services, Inc.,
notified the Court that they have agreed to dismiss the adversary
proceeding asserted by Asurion, with prejudice.  Each party will
bear its own costs, including attorney fees.

The Court also approved the settlement agreement and mutual
general release between Amp'd Mobile, Brightpoint North America,
L.P., and Kings Road Investment Ltd.

                      About Amp'd Mobile Inc.

Headquartered in Los Angeles, California, Amp'd Mobile Inc. aka
Amp'D Mobile LLC -- http://www.ampd.com/-- is a mobile virtual  
network operator that provides voice, text and entertainment
content to subscribers who contract for cellular telephone
service. The company filed for chapter 11 protection on June 1,
2007 (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 07-10739). Steven M. Yoder, Esq.,
Eric M. Sutty, Esq. and Mary E. Augustine, Esq. at The Bayard Firm
represent the Debtor in its restructuring efforts.  Attorneys at
Otterbourg, Steindler, Houston & Rosen, P.C. and Klehr, Harrison,
Harvey, Branzburg & Ellers, LLP, represent the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.  In its schedules filed with the Court,
the Debtor listed total assets of $47,603,629 and total debts of
$164, 569,842.  The Debtor's exclusive period to file a plan
expired on Sept. 29, 2007.  (Amp'd Mobile Bankruptcy News, Issue
No. 24; Bankruptcy Creditors' Services Inc.
http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).


AMP'D MOBILE: Seeks $1MM in Preference Claims from 18 Payees
------------------------------------------------------------
Amp'd Mobile, Inc., has filed additional complaints, seeking to
recover money or property, aggregating more than $1,000,000, with
respect to certain transfers made to 18 creditors.  The Debtor
also seeks to avoid the Transfers.

The transferees and the amounts transferred to them are:

   Transferee                                        Amount
   ----------                                        ------
   Ninja Mobile, Inc.                              $391,370
   Tecart Industries, Inc.                           97,397
   Clavechina International, Ltd.                    97,258
   Warner Music Group Corp.                          95,547
   Lunchbox Collective, LLC                          72,670
   Corporation Service Company                       69,536
   Pro Circuit Products, Inc.                        50,000
   FedEx Corporation                                 49,877
   Wonders Industrial Development                    49,050
   UMG Recordings, Inc.                              46,789
   Broadview Technologies, Inc.                      41,363
   Visual Army Party, Ltd.                           35,984
   Road to Recovery Foundation, Inc.                 30,000
   Tectonics Construction, Inc.                      29,484
   Fast Search & Transfer, Inc.                      28,125
   Riechesbaird, Inc.                                28,000
   Sceneware VOF                                     25,348
   Walt Disney Internet Group                        21,487

Headquartered in Los Angeles, California, Amp'd Mobile Inc. aka
Amp'D Mobile LLC -- http://www.ampd.com/-- is a mobile virtual  
network operator that provides voice, text and entertainment
content to subscribers who contract for cellular telephone
service. The company filed for chapter 11 protection on June 1,
2007 (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 07-10739). Steven M. Yoder, Esq.,
Eric M. Sutty, Esq. and Mary E. Augustine, Esq. at The Bayard Firm
represent the Debtor in its restructuring efforts.  Attorneys at
Otterbourg, Steindler, Houston & Rosen, P.C. and Klehr, Harrison,
Harvey, Branzburg & Ellers, LLP, represent the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.  In its schedules filed with the Court,
the Debtor listed total assets of $47,603,629 and total debts of
$164, 569,842.  The Debtor's exclusive period to file a plan
expired on Sept. 29, 2007.  (Amp'd Mobile Bankruptcy News, Issue
No. 24; Bankruptcy Creditors' Services Inc.
http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).


AMR CORP: Airline Operating Schedule Is Back to Normal, WSJ Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
AMR Corp.'s principal subsidiary American Airlines Inc. said its
operating schedule was back to normal on Sunday, April 13, 2008,
Kristen Gerencher of The Wall Street Journal reports.

American Airlines canceled approximately 200 MD-80 flights on
Saturday, April 12, 2008, and said it planned to be back to a
full, normal schedule on Sunday.

By late Friday afternoon, American had re-inspected and put back
into service 231 of its 300 MD-80s; most of the remainder of the
fleet was expected to be readied for service Friday night.  The
airline planned to operate about 75% of its MD-80 schedule early
Saturday, with all planes in service by late Saturday afternoon.

There were 595 MD80 flight cancellations in place on Friday.

American had 226 of its 300 MD80s in service early Friday morning.
The airline continues efforts to re-accommodate customers affected
by this week's activity as its maintenance work force continued
the safety inspections.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on April 11, 2008, as
of Thursday afternoon, 132 MD-80 aircraft were returned to
service.  Inspections will continue overnight, with approximately
170 MD-80s expected to be available for service on Friday morning.  
American Airlines canceled more than 900 flights on Thursday.

As of Wednesday afternoon,

    * 179 MD-80 aircraft were completely inspected;
    * 60 of the 179 MD-80s were returned to service;
    * 119 of the 179 MD-80s were still undergoing work;
    * 121 MD-80s remain to be inspected.

On Wednesday, American officially canceled 1,094 flights, in
addition to the 460 canceled on Tuesday.

These inspections were conducted to ensure compliance with a
Federal Aviation Administration directive related to the bundling
of wires in the aircraft's wheel well of the MD-80 aircraft.  
These inspections -- based on FAA audits -- are related to
detailed, technical compliance issues and not safety-of-flight
issues.

American also plans to contract with an independent third party to
review American's processes for compliance with all future FAA
airworthiness directives.  This work will ensure that all
procedures strictly adhere to the technical elements of every
directive so American can avoid this type of schedule disruption
in the future.

Customers who were scheduled on a flight that was canceled may
request a full refund or apply the value of their ticket toward
future travel on American Airlines.  Additionally, customers
scheduled to travel on any MD-80 flight April 8-13, even if their
flight has not been canceled, may rebook without a change fee to
any AA flight with availability in the same cabin as long as their
travel begins by April 17.

Headquartered in Forth Worth, Texas, AMR Corporation (NYSE:
AMR) operates with its principal subsidiary, American Airlines
Inc. -- http://www.aa.com/-- a worldwide scheduled passenger          
airline.  At the end of 2006, American provided scheduled jet
service to about 150 destinations throughout North America, the
Caribbean, Latin America, Europe and Asia.  American is also a
scheduled airfreight carrier, providing freight and mail services
to shippers throughout its system.

Its wholly owned subsidiary, AMR Eagle Holding Corp., owns two
regional airlines, American Eagle Airlines Inc. and Executive
Airlines Inc., and does business as "American Eagle."  American
Beacon Advisors Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of AMR, is
responsible for the investment and oversight of assets of AMR's
U.S. employee benefit plans, as well as AMR's short-term
investments.

                          *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Nov. 30, 2007,
following the announcement by AMR Corp. that it intends to divest
its American Eagle Holding Corp. subsidiary in 2008, Fitch expects
no near-term impact on the debt ratings of AMR and its principal
operating subsidiary, American Airlines Inc.  Fitch affirmed both
entities' Issuer Default Ratings at 'B-' on Nov. 13, 2007, while
revising the Rating Outlook for AMR to Positive.


ARGENT SECURITIES: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 104 Tranches
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded the ratings of 104 tranches
from 11 subprime RMBS transactions issued by Argent.  21
downgraded tranches remain on review for possible further
downgrade.  The collateral backing these transactions consists
primarily of first-lien, fixed and adjustable-rate, subprime
residential mortgage loans.

The ratings were downgraded, in general, based on higher than
anticipated rates of delinquency, foreclosure, and REO in the
underlying collateral relative to credit enhancement levels.  The
actions described below are a result of Moody's on-going
surveillance process.

Complete rating actions are:

Issuer: Argent Securities Inc., Series 2005-W2

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Baa1 from A2

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Ba1 from A3

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to B2 from Baa1; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to B3 from Baa2; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-9, Downgraded to Caa1 from Baa3

  -- Cl. M-10, Downgraded to Caa2 from Ba1

Issuer: Argent Securities Inc., Series 2005-W3

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to A1 from Aa3

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to A3 from A1

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Baa3 from A2

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to B1 from A3

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to B3 from Baa1; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to Caa1 from Baa2

  -- Cl. M-9, Downgraded to Caa2 from Baa3

  -- Cl. M-10, Downgraded to Caa3 from Ba1

  -- Cl. M-11, Downgraded to Ca from Ba2

Issuer: Argent Securities Inc., Series 2005-W5

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to A2 from Aa2

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to Baa3 from Aa3

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to B1 from A1

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to B2 from A2; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to B3 from A3; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to Caa1 from Baa1

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to Caa2 from Baa2

  -- Cl. M-9, Downgraded to Caa3 from Ba1

Issuer: Argent Securities Trust 2006-M1

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to Aa3 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2B, Downgraded to Aa1 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2C, Downgraded to Aa3 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2D, Downgraded to A2 from Aaa

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to Ba3 from Aa1

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to B2 from Aa2; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to B3 from Aa3; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Caa1 from A3

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Caa2 from Baa3

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Caa3 from Ba2

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to Ca from B3

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to C from Ca

Issuer: Argent Securities Trust 2006-M2

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to A3 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2B, Downgraded to Aa2 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2C, Downgraded to A3 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2D, Downgraded to Baa2 from Aaa

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to B2 from Aa1; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to B3 from Aa2; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to Caa1 from Aa3

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Caa2 from Ba1

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Caa3 from B2

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Caa3 from B3

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to Ca from Caa3

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to C from Ca

Issuer: Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc., Series 2006-M3

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to A3 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2A, Downgraded to Aa1 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2B, Downgraded to A3 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2C, Downgraded to Baa1 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2D, Downgraded to Baa2 from Aaa

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to B1 from Aa1; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to B2 from Aa2; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to B3 from Aa3; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Caa1 from Baa3

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Caa2 from Ba2

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Caa3 from B3

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to Ca from B3

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to Ca from Caa3

Issuer: Argent Securities Trust 2006-W1

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to Baa1 from Aa3

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Ba2 from A1

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to B2 from A3; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Caa1 from Baa1

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to Caa2 from Ba2

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to Caa3 from Ba3

  -- Cl. M-9, Downgraded to Ca from B3

Issuer: Argent Securities Trust 2006-W2

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to A2 from Aa2

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to Ba1 from Aa3

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to B2 from A1; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to B3 from A3; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Caa1 from Baa2

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to Caa2 from Ba2

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to Caa3 from B3

Issuer: Argent Securities Trust 2006-W3

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to Baa1 from Aa1

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to B2 from Aa2; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to B3 from Aa3; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Caa1 from A3

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Caa2 from Baa2

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Caa3 from Ba1

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to Ca from B3

Issuer: Argent Securities Trust 2006-W4

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to Aa2 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2B, Downgraded to Aa1 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2C, Downgraded to Aa3 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2D, Downgraded to A1 from Aaa

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to Ba2 from Aa1

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to B2 from Aa2; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to B3 from Aa3; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Caa1 from Baa2

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Caa2 from Ba1

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Caa3 from B1

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to C from Ca

Issuer: Argent Securities Trust 2006-W5

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to Aa1 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2B, Downgraded to Aa1 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2C, Downgraded to Aa2 from Aaa

  -- Cl. A-2D, Downgraded to A1 from Aaa

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to Ba2 from Aa1

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to B2 from Aa2; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to B3 from Aa3; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Caa1 from Baa1

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Caa2 from Ba2

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Caa3 from Ba3

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to Caa3 from B3

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to C from Ca


ATA AIRLINES: Gets Interim Permission to Use Lenders' Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------------
Prior to April 2, 2008, New ATA Acquisition Inc., as borrower,
certain lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative
agent for the Lenders, reached a term loan agreement, under which
the Secured Lenders provided New ATA and ATA Airlines, Inc.,
loans and other financial assistance for more than $365,000,000.

ATA Airlines is a wholly owned subsidiary of New ATA Acquisition.

Pursuant to a guarantee and collateral agreement dated August 14,
2007, ATA Airlines guaranteed New ATA's indebtedness under the
Term Loan Agreement, and granted a security interest in
substantially all of its personal property as collateral security
for its obligations under the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement.

Pursuant to the Prepetition Loan Documents, ATA Airlines granted
to the Administrative Agent and the Secured Lenders liens and
security interests to secure the Prepetition Obligations, upon
and in certain of ATA Airlines' assets and property, including
without limitation certain owned aircraft, all Accounts, Chattel
Paper, Contracts, Deposit Accounts, Securities Accounts,
Commodity Accounts, Documents, Equipment, Fixtures, General
Intangibles, Instruments, Intellectual Property, Inventory,
Investment Property, Letter of Credit Rights, and all other
tangible and intangible personal property and the property's
proceeds -- including set-off rights described in the Loan
Documents and arising by operation of law.

ATA Airlines' cash, including all cash and other amounts on
deposit or maintained by ATA Airlines in any account or accounts,
and any amounts generated by the collection of accounts
receivable, sale of inventory or other disposition of the
Prepetition Collateral constitute proceeds of the Prepetition
Collateral and, therefore, are cash collateral of the Secured
Lenders within the meaning of Section 363(a) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

Terry Hall, Esq., at Bakers & Daniels, LLP, in Indianapolis,
Indiana, states that in light of its limited working capital and
financing available, ATA Airlines needs to use its Secured
Lenders' cash collateral, to wind down its business and liquidate
its assets.

Ms. Hall informs Judge Basil H. Lorch III that ATA Airlines
projects to use $23,585,000 of the cash collateral as set forth in
its 26-Week Forecast,a full-text copy of which is available at no
charge at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/ATA26WeekCashForecast

During the period from April 2 to 25, 2008, the Debtor seeks to
use approximately $2,100,000 of Cash Collateral to meet the
necessary expenditures as outlined in its four-week budget, a
full-text copy of which is available for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/ATACashCollateralBudget

The Secured Lenders have consented to the use of the $2,100,000
for the April 2 to April 25 period, says Mr. Hall.

While it is not able to accurately assess the value of all its
assets at this time, ATA Airlines believes that the estimated
liquidation value of the collateral it owns that secures its
obligations to the Secured Lenders is approximately
$50,000,000.

Accordingly, ATA Airlines sought and obtained, on an interim
basis, permission from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, to use the  
Cash Collateral for general corporate purposes during its Chapter
11 Case in accordance with the terms and conditions of ATA's
Budget.

ATA will only use the Cash Collateral for the payment of the
costs and expenses associated with the wind-down operations of
its business, the orderly liquidation of its assets and the
conduct of the Chapter 11 Case as set forth in its four-week
Budget.

No later than 10 days prior to the last day covered by the Budget
then in effect, ATA will deliver to the Secured Lenders and the
Administrative Agent a proposed budget covering the
subsequent four-week period.

As adequate protection, ATA Airlines will grant the Secured
Lenders and JPMorgan, valid and perfected, replacement security
interests in and liens on all of its prepetition and postpetition
assets.

ATA Airlines' use of the Cash Collateral will be subject to a
"carve-out", comprised of:

   * the unpaid fees of the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court and of
     the United States Trustee;

   * the payment of allowed professional fees and disbursements
     by ATA Airlines' bankruptcy professionals, not exceeding
     $750,000 in the aggregate; and

   * the costs and administrative expenses not to exceed $100,000
     in the aggregate that are permitted to be incurred by any
     Chapter 7 trustee following any conversion to Chapter 7 of
     ATA Airlines' the Chapter 11 case.

Any diminution in the value of the Secured Lenders' interests in
their prepetition collateral resulting from the use of the cash
collateral, or other causes will constitute administrative
expenses with priority in payment over all other expenses, and
will be senior to the rights of ATA Airlines, any successor
trustee and creditors, the Court held.

The use of cash collateral will terminate on the earliest of  (i)
September 30, 2008, (ii) unless extended by the Secured Lenders
30 days after the Petition Date, or (iii) the occurrence of any
event of default, which includes:

   (1) ATA Airlines' failure to pay to JPMorgan or the Secured
       Lenders as and when required by interim Court order;

   (2) the expiration of the Budget without a new proposed
       Budget;

   (3) ATA Airlines' Chapter 11 case is dismissed or converted to
       a Chapter 7 case;

   (4) the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee with plenary
       powers, an officer or an examiner with enlarged powers are
       appointed in ATA Airlines' Chapter 11 case; or

   (5) the Court's lifting of the automatic stay to permit
       holders of any security interest to foreclose on any of
       ATA Airlines' assets that are worth more than $250,000.

The Court will convene a hearing on April 25, 2008, to consider
final approval of the request.

                      About ATA Airlines

Headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, ATA Airlines, Inc., is a
diversified passenger airline operating in two principal business
lines -- a low cost carrier providing scheduled passenger service
that leverages a code share agreement with Southwest Airlines; and
a charter operator that focused primarily on providing charter
service to the U.S. government and military.  ATA is a wholly
owned subsidiary of New ATA  Acquisition, Inc. -- a wholly owned
subsidiary of New ATA Investment, Inc., which in turn, is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Global Aero Logistics Inc.  ATA Acquisition
also owns another holding company subsidiary, World Air Holdings,
Inc., which it acquired through merger on August 14, 2007.  World
Air Holdings owns and operates two other airlines, North American
Airlines and World Airways.

ATA Airlines and its affiliates filed for chapter 11 protection on
Oct. 26, 2004 (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case Nos. 04-19866, 04-19868
through 04-19874).  The Honorable Basil H. Lorch III confirmed the
Debtors' plan of reorganization on Jan. 31, 2006.  The Debtors'
emerged from bankruptcy on Feb. 28, 2006.

Global Aero Logistics acquired certain of ATA's operations after
its first bankruptcy.  The remaining ATA affiliates that were not
substantively consolidated in the company's first bankruptcy case
were sold or otherwise liquidated.

ATA Airlines filed for Chapter 22 on April 2 (Bankr. S.D. Ind.
Case No. 08-03675), citing the unexpected cancellation of a key
contract for ATA's military charter business, which made it
impossible for ATA to obtain additional capital to sustain its
operations or restructure the business.  ATA discontinued all
operations subsequent to the bankruptcy filing.  ATA's Chapter 22
bankruptcy petition lists assets and liabilities each in the range
of $100 million to $500 million.  (ATA Airlines Bankruptcy News;
Bankruptcy Creditors' Services Inc. http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/
or 215/945-7000).


ATA AIRLINES: Taps Haynes and Boone as Bankruptcy Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
ATA Airlines, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Indiana to employ Haynes and Boone,
LLP, as its bankruptcy counsel.

Steven S. Turoff, chief restructuring officer of the Debtor, says
that the Debtor selected the firm because of its extensive
experience in representing airlines in Chapter 11 cases.  He adds
that Haynes and Boone is also familiar with the Debtor's business
and legal obligations to creditors, having assisted the Debtor
with its preparations to file for bankruptcy protection.

As counsel for the Debtors, Haynes and Boone will:

   (a) give advice to the Debtor of its powers and duties as
       debtor-in-possession under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
       Code, and of the continued management and any orderly
       shutdown of its business;

   (b) advise the Debtor of its responsibilities in complying
       with the U.S. Trustee's Operating Guidelines and Reporting
       Requirements, and with the rules of the Court;

   (c) prepare legal documents on behalf of the Debtor;

   (d) represent the Debtor and protect its interest in all
       matters pending before the Court; and

   (e) represent the Debtor in negotiating with its creditors.

In exchange for its services, Haynes and Boone will be paid on an
hourly basis and will be reimbursed for any expenses it may incur
in the rendition of its services.  The firm received a retainer
for $1,000,000 before the Petition Date.

The principal attorneys and paralegal designated to represent the
Debtor and their standard hourly rates are:

   Lenard Parkins       $825
   Judy Elkin           $775
   Kenric Kattner       $595
   Blaine Bates         $515
   Doug Edwards         $495
   Kourtney Lyda        $435
   Jason Nagi           $415
   Brooks Hamilton      $330
   Jason Binford        $330
   Jermaine Johnson     $210

Mr. Kattner, Esq., a partner at Haynes and Boone, assures the
Court that his firm is a "disinterested person" as that phrase is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, as modified by
Section 1107(b).

                      About ATA Airlines

Headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, ATA Airlines, Inc., is a
diversified passenger airline operating in two principal business
lines -- a low cost carrier providing scheduled passenger service
that leverages a code share agreement with Southwest Airlines; and
a charter operator that focused primarily on providing charter
service to the U.S. government and military.  ATA is a wholly
owned subsidiary of New ATA  Acquisition, Inc. -- a wholly owned
subsidiary of New ATA Investment, Inc., which in turn, is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Global Aero Logistics Inc.  ATA Acquisition
also owns another holding company subsidiary, World Air Holdings,
Inc., which it acquired through merger on August 14, 2007.  World
Air Holdings owns and operates two other airlines, North American
Airlines and World Airways.

ATA Airlines and its affiliates filed for chapter 11 protection on
Oct. 26, 2004 (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case Nos. 04-19866, 04-19868
through 04-19874).  The Honorable Basil H. Lorch III confirmed the
Debtors' plan of reorganization on Jan. 31, 2006.  The Debtors'
emerged from bankruptcy on Feb. 28, 2006.

Global Aero Logistics acquired certain of ATA's operations after
its first bankruptcy.  The remaining ATA affiliates that were not
substantively consolidated in the company's first bankruptcy case
were sold or otherwise liquidated.

ATA Airlines filed for Chapter 22 on April 2 (Bankr. S.D. Ind.
Case No. 08-03675), citing the unexpected cancellation of a key
contract for ATA's military charter business, which made it
impossible for ATA to obtain additional capital to sustain its
operations or restructure the business.  ATA discontinued all
operations subsequent to the bankruptcy filing.  ATA's Chapter 22
bankruptcy petition lists assets and liabilities each in the range
of $100 million to $500 million.  (ATA Airlines Bankruptcy News;
Bankruptcy Creditors' Services Inc. http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/
or 215/945-7000).


ATA AIRLINES: Taps Baker & Daniels as Local Bankruptcy Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
ATA Airlines, Inc., seeks permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Indiana to employ Baker &
Daniels LLP, as its local counsel.

Steven S. Turoff, chief restructuring officer of the Debtor,
informs the Court that the firm has considerable experience in
business reorganization under Chapter 11, and is also familiar
with the Debtor's business as a result of its employment with the
Debtor in a prior bankruptcy case.

As the Debtor's local counsel, Baker & Daniels is expected to:

   (i) advise the Debtor of its rights, powers and duties as a
       debtor-in-possession;

  (ii) prepare legal documents on behalf of the Debtors; and

(iii) provide other legal services that the Debtor or the
       Court may require.

Baker & Daniels will be paid on an hourly basis and will be
reimbursed for any cost it may incur in rendering its duties.
Prior to the Petition Date, the firm received a retainer for
$50,000.

The firm's professional who will represent the Debtor and their
hourly rates are:

   James M. Carr        $480
   Jay Jaffe            $445
   Terry Hall           $290
   Dustin DeNeal        $185
   Sarah Laughlin       $180

Ms. Hall, Esq., a member of Baker & Daniels, assures the Court
that her firm does not hold or represent any interest adverse to
the Debtor's estate.  She adds that the firm is a disinterested
person" as that phrase is defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code, as modified by Section 1107(b).

                      About ATA Airlines

Headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, ATA Airlines, Inc., is a
diversified passenger airline operating in two principal business
lines -- a low cost carrier providing scheduled passenger service
that leverages a code share agreement with Southwest Airlines; and
a charter operator that focused primarily on providing charter
service to the U.S. government and military.  ATA is a wholly
owned subsidiary of New ATA  Acquisition, Inc. -- a wholly owned
subsidiary of New ATA Investment, Inc., which in turn, is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Global Aero Logistics Inc.  ATA Acquisition
also owns another holding company subsidiary, World Air Holdings,
Inc., which it acquired through merger on August 14, 2007.  World
Air Holdings owns and operates two other airlines, North American
Airlines and World Airways.

ATA Airlines and its affiliates filed for chapter 11 protection on
Oct. 26, 2004 (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case Nos. 04-19866, 04-19868
through 04-19874).  The Honorable Basil H. Lorch III confirmed the
Debtors' plan of reorganization on Jan. 31, 2006.  The Debtors'
emerged from bankruptcy on Feb. 28, 2006.

Global Aero Logistics acquired certain of ATA's operations after
its first bankruptcy.  The remaining ATA affiliates that were not
substantively consolidated in the company's first bankruptcy case
were sold or otherwise liquidated.

ATA Airlines filed for Chapter 22 on April 2 (Bankr. S.D. Ind.
Case No. 08-03675), citing the unexpected cancellation of a key
contract for ATA's military charter business, which made it
impossible for ATA to obtain additional capital to sustain its
operations or restructure the business.  ATA discontinued all
operations subsequent to the bankruptcy filing.  ATA's Chapter 22
bankruptcy petition lists assets and liabilities each in the range
of $100 million to $500 million.  (ATA Airlines Bankruptcy News;
Bankruptcy Creditors' Services Inc. http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/
or 215/945-7000).


ATA AIRLINES: Sec. 341 Meeting of Creditors Scheduled for May 30
----------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Trustee for Region 10 will convene a meeting of
the creditors of ATA Airlines, Inc., on May 30, 2008, at 9:30
a.m.  The meeting will be held at Room 416A U.S. Courthouse, 46
E. Ohio Street, in Indianapolis, Indiana.

This is the first meeting of creditors required under Section
341(a) of the Bankruptcy Code in the Debtor's bankruptcy case.

All creditors are invited but are not required to attend.  The
Sec. 341(a) meeting offers the creditors a one-time opportunity
to examine a representative of the Debtor under oath, about the
Debtor's financial affairs and operations that would be of
interest to the general body of creditors.

Headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, ATA Airlines, Inc., is a
diversified passenger airline operating in two principal business
lines -- a low cost carrier providing scheduled passenger service
that leverages a code share agreement with Southwest Airlines; and
a charter operator that focused primarily on providing charter
service to the U.S. government and military.  ATA is a wholly
owned subsidiary of New ATA  Acquisition, Inc. -- a wholly owned
subsidiary of New ATA Investment, Inc., which in turn, is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Global Aero Logistics Inc.  ATA Acquisition
also owns another holding company subsidiary, World Air Holdings,
Inc., which it acquired through merger on August 14, 2007.  World
Air Holdings owns and operates two other airlines, North American
Airlines and World Airways.

ATA Airlines and its affiliates filed for chapter 11 protection on
Oct. 26, 2004 (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case Nos. 04-19866, 04-19868
through 04-19874).  The Honorable Basil H. Lorch III confirmed the
Debtors' plan of reorganization on Jan. 31, 2006.  The Debtors'
emerged from bankruptcy on Feb. 28, 2006.

Global Aero Logistics acquired certain of ATA's operations after
its first bankruptcy.  The remaining ATA affiliates that were not
substantively consolidated in the company's first bankruptcy case
were sold or otherwise liquidated.

ATA Airlines filed for Chapter 22 on April 2 (Bankr. S.D. Ind.
Case No. 08-03675), citing the unexpected cancellation of a key
contract for ATA's military charter business, which made it
impossible for ATA to obtain additional capital to sustain its
operations or restructure the business.  ATA discontinued all
operations subsequent to the bankruptcy filing.  ATA's Chapter 22
bankruptcy petition lists assets and liabilities each in the range
of $100 million to $500 million.  (ATA Airlines Bankruptcy News;
Bankruptcy Creditors' Services Inc. http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/
or 215/945-7000).


ATHOS FUNDING: Moody's Junks Ratings on Two Classes of 2043 Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded and left on review for
possible downgrade these notes issued by Athos Funding Ltd.:

Class Description: $40,000,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Notes Due
2043

  -- Prior Rating: Aaa
  -- Current Rating: Aa3, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $28,000,000 Class A-2 Floating Rate Notes Due
2043

  -- Prior Rating: Aa2
  -- Current Rating: Ba1, on review for possible downgrade

In addition Moody's also announced that it has downgraded these
notes:

Class Description: $20,000,000 Class B Floating Rate Subordinate
Notes Due 2043

  -- Prior Rating: Baa2
  -- Current Rating: Ca

Class Description: $5,000,000 Class Q Combination Notes Due 2043

  -- Prior Rating: Baa2
  -- Current Rating: Ca

According to Moody's, the rating actions are the result of
deterioration in the credit quality of the transaction's
underlying collateral pool, which consists primarily of structured
finance securities.


AXM PHARMA: To Restate 2004 Financial Statements Due to Errors
--------------------------------------------------------------
On March 31, 2008, while in the process of responding to comments
from the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to its
2005 financial statements, AXM Pharma Inc.'s audit committee
determined that its annual financial statements for the fiscal
year ended Dec. 31, 2004, and all subsequent annual and quarterly
financial statements contain errors and omissions.  As a result,
the audit committee concluded that these financial statements are
no longer reliable.  

The errors and omissions contained in these financial statements
result from failure to properly record certain liabilities and
expenses related to the issuance of Series C Preferred Stock and
associated Common Stock Purchase Warrants during the quarter ended
June 30, 2004, and certain liabilities and expenses related to the
issuance of Secured Convertible Promissory Notes and associated
Common Stock Purchase Warrants during the quarter ended April 30,
2005.

The audit committee has discussed this matter with its prior
independent accountant, Lopez, Blevins, Bork & Associates, LLP,
who issued reports with respect to the relevant periods, and has
notified its current independent accountant, Paritz & Company,
P.A., of this matter.

                       About AXM Pharma

Headquartered in Diamond Bar, Calif., AXM Pharma Inc. (Other OTC:
AXMP.PK) -- http://www.axmpharma.com/-- is a pharmaceutical  
company engaged in the production, marketing and distribution of
pharmaceutical products in China.  The company produces, markets
and distributes medicines in various dosages and forms in most
areas of medicinal treatment, as well as herbal remedies, vitamins
and adjunctive therapies.

                          *     *     *

As of March 31, 2006, the company's consolidated balance sheet
showed $10,641,129 in total assets and $10,763,844 in total
liabilities, resulting in a $122,715 total stockholders' deficit.


BATTERY PARK: Moody's Reviews Two 'Ca' Ratings For Likely Upgrade
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has withdrawn the ratings on these notes
issued by Battery Park CDO Limited:

The $15,000,000 Class II-A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes Due
2011

  -- Prior Rating: Aaa
  -- Current Rating: WR

The $21,000,000 Class II-B Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes Due
2011

  -- Prior Rating: Aaa
  -- Current Rating: WR

The $9,000,000 Class III Mezzanine Secured Fixed Rate Notes Due
2011

  -- Prior Rating: Ba3, on review for possible upgrade
  -- Current Rating: WR

In addition Moody's has placed these notes issued by Battery Park
CDO Limited on review for possible upgrade:

The $17,000,000 Class IV-A Mezzanine Secured Floating Notes Due
2011

  -- Prior Rating: Ca
  -- Current Rating: Ca, on review for possible upgrade

The $5,000,000 Class IV-B Mezzanine Secured Fixed Rate Notes Due
2011

  -- Prior Rating: Ca
  -- Current Rating: Ca, on review for possible upgrade

According to Moody's, the rating actions are the results of
significant delevering of the Class III Notes as well as
improvement in the credit quality of the transaction's underlying
collateral pool.


BAYTEX ENERGY: Strong Credit Profile Cues S&P's Positive Outlook
----------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services revised its outlook on Calgary,
Altanta-based Baytex Energy Trust to positive from stable.  At the
same time, S&P affirmed the 'B+' long-term corporate credit and
'B' subordinated debt ratings on the company.
     
"The outlook revision reflects the trust's demonstrated ability to
maintain fairly stable profit margins, despite its large exposure
to heavy oil, and adhere to relatively moderate financial
policies, said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Jamie Koutsoukis.   

These factors have contributed to an overall stronger credit
profile.  S&P views the trust's demonstrated ability to largely
fund its capital expenditures and its cash distributions through
internally generated cash flow as a strong credit positive.  
Furthermore, Baytex's increasing product mix diversification, with
the announced Burmis Energy Inc. acquisition, further strengthens
its overall profile as it adds more light oil and natural gas to
the trust's product mix.  

"A near-term rating upgrade to 'BB-' is highly likely if the
company maintains its existing business and financial policies,"
Ms. Koutsoukis added.
     
The ratings on Baytex reflect the company's midsize reserve base,
its concentration of production and regional focus, and the
cyclical nature of the exploration and production industry.  These
factors, which hamper the ratings, are tempered by the relatively
low-risk nature of the trust's reserve base, the good development
opportunities associated with Baytex's existing portfolio of
assets, and moderate capital structure for the ratings category.   
Standard & Poor's expects that the trust's near-term business
strategy will focus on drill-bit-related reserve replacement as it
works to develop its sizable proved undeveloped and probable
reserves.
     
The positive outlook reflects Standard & Poor's expectation that
Baytex will continue to largely fund its capital spending program
and distributions through internally generated funds, while
maintaining a stable production and reserve profile.  The trust's
credit profile continues to strengthen, based on its consistently
strong netbacks and largely internal growth focus, supplemented
with acquisitions.  These factors place the trust at the strong
end of the 'B+' rating, moving toward the 'BB-' rating.   
Furthermore, Baytex's cost structure should allow the trust to
withstand some deterioration in profitability due either to
falling hydrocarbon prices or increases in capital expenditures.   
An upgrade is likely if the trust continues to move toward greater
product and geographic diversification while adhering to its
financial policies.  Given the cushion in the rating, the
likelihood of a near-term negative rating action is unlikely;
however, S&P could revise the outlook to stable if the trust
materially ramps up its spending or distributions above expected
levels.


BEAR STEARNS: Moody's Lowers Ratings on 268 Tranches From 27 Deals
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded the ratings of 268 tranches
from 27 subprime RMBS transactions issued by Bear Stearns
Subprime.  Additionally, 92 downgraded tranches remain on review
for possible further downgrade.  The collateral backing these
transactions consists primarily of first-lien, fixed and
adjustable-rate, subprime residential mortgage loans.

The ratings were downgraded, in general, based on higher than
anticipated rates of delinquency, foreclosure, and REO in the
underlying collateral relative to credit enhancement levels.  The
actions described below are a result of Moody's on-going
surveillance process.

Complete rating actions are:

Issuer: Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-AQ2

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to A2 from Aa2

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to Baa2 from Aa3

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to B2 from A2; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to B3 from A3; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Caa1 from Baa1

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to Caa2 from Baa2

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to Caa3 from Baa3

  -- Cl. M-9, Downgraded to Ca from Ba1

  -- Cl. M-10, Downgraded to Ca from Ba2

Issuer: Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-EC1

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to Ba1 from Baa2

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to B2 from Baa3; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

Issuer: Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-FR1

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Ba2 from Baa2

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Caa1 from Baa3

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to Caa2 from Ba1

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to Caa3 from B2

Issuer: Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-HE11

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Baa2 from Baa1

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to Ba3 from Baa2

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to B2 from Baa3; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-9, Downgraded to Caa1 from Ba1

  -- Cl. M-10, Downgraded to Caa2 from Ba2

Issuer: Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-HE12

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Baa1 from A3

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Ba2 from Baa1

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to B3 from Baa2; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to Caa1 from Baa3

Issuer: Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2006-AQ1

  -- Cl. I-1A-1, Downgraded to Aa2 from Aaa

  -- Cl. I-1A-2, Downgraded to A1 from Aaa

  -- Cl. I-1A-3, Downgraded to A2 from Aaa

  -- Cl. I-2A, Downgraded to Aa3 from Aaa

  -- Cl. I-M-1, Downgraded to Ba3 from Aa1

  -- Cl. I-M-2, Downgraded to B1 from Aa2; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-M-3, Downgraded to B2 from Aa3; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-M-4, Downgraded to B3 from Ba1; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-M-5, Downgraded to Caa1 from B1

  -- Cl. I-M-6, Downgraded to Caa2 from B3

  -- Cl. I-M-7, Downgraded to Caa3 from Caa2

  -- Cl. II-A-1, Downgraded to Aa1 from Aaa

  -- Cl. II-A-2, Downgraded to A3 from Aaa

  -- Cl. II-A-3, Downgraded to Baa2 from Aaa

  -- Cl. II-M-1, Downgraded to B1 from Aa1; Placed Under Review
     for further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-M-2, Downgraded to B2 from Aa2; Placed Under Review
     for further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-M-3, Downgraded to B2 from Aa3; Placed Under Review
     for further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-M-4, Downgraded to B3 from Ba1; Placed Under Review
     for further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-M-5, Downgraded to Caa1 from B3

  -- Cl. II-M-6, Downgraded to Caa2 from B3

  -- Cl. II-M-7, Downgraded to Caa3 from Caa1

  -- Cl. II-M-8, Downgraded to Ca from Caa2

Issuer: Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2006-EC1

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Ba3 from Baa2

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to B3 from Baa3; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to Caa1 from Ba3

  -- Cl. M-9, Downgraded to Caa2 from B3

Issuer: Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2006-EC2

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to B1 from Baa3

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to B3 from Ba2; Placed Under Review for
     further Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-9, Downgraded to Caa1 from B3

Issuer: Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2006-HE1

  -- Cl. I-M-6, D