---

         T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Wednesday, July 8, 2015, Vol. 19, No. 189

                            Headlines

254 CHURCH STREET: Case Summary & 4 Largest Unsecured Creditors
AEREO INC: TiVo Makes Pitch to Former Customers
AMERICAN HOUSING: 5th Circ. Affirms Templeton Claims Subordination
ANNA'S LINENS: SM 101 Seeks to Repossess Santa Maria, Calif. Land
ARCH COAL: Fitch Cuts Issuer Default Rating to 'C'

ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE: High Court Asked to Take Cemetery Dispute
ARCHDIOCESE OF ST. PAUL: Sex Abuse Case Remanded to Ramsey Court
ATLANTIC & PACIFIC: 2nd Circ. Affirms Discrimination Suit Dismissal
BEHLING DAIRY: Wins Approval of First Amended Plan
BHMDF LTD: Case Summary & 9 Largest Unsecured Creditors

BOLLINGER INVESTMENT: Case Summary & 5 Top Unsecured Creditors
BOOMERANG TUBE: Hires Debevoise as Special Corporate Counsel
BOOMERANG TUBE: July 10 Hearing on Zolfo Cooper Employment
BOOMERANG TUBE: Taps Young Conaway as Bankruptcy Counsel
BROOKLYN RENAISSANCE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

BRUGNARA PROPERTIES: Seeks Dismissal of Chapter 11 Case
BTB CORPORATION: Bankruptcy Filing Stays Rodriguez Suit
CLASSIC CAR WASH: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
COLT DEFENSE: Seeks July 29 Extension of Schedules Filing Date
DOTS LLC: Court Approves Sixth Amended to DIP Credit Facility

EMPRESAS OMAJEDE: BPPR Directed to Amend Late Fees Claim
ENERGY CONVERSION: Denial of Priority Treatment Request Affirmed
ENERGY FUTURE: Bondholders Warned About Desire for Oncor
ERG INTERMEDIATE: Can Pay $700K Incentive Payment to CFO
ERROL WALTERS: Wells Fargo Has Green Light to Pursue Foreclosure

FEDERAL RESOURCES: Solicitation Period Extended to July 22
FOUR TIGERS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
GENERAL GROWTH: Appeal in Iwi Relocation Suit Dismissed as Moot
GIULIANO PROPERTIES: Case Summary & 6 Largest Unsecured Creditors
GOBER & MERRELL: Case Summary & 4 Top Unsecured Creditors

GOLDEN COUNTY: Court Okays Sale of Assets to Monogram Appetizers
GOLDEN COUNTY: Drops Bid to Settle Claims of OSHA
GOLDEN COUNTY: Gets Additional $400K Loan from PNC Bank
GT ADVANCED: Court OKs GTAT's Exclusivity Agreement With Waaree
GT ADVANCED: Sale of Sapphire Assets to Thermal Technology Okayed

GT ADVANCED: Seeks Approval of $95-Mil. Bankruptcy Loan
HEPAR BIOSCIENCE: Cadwell Sanford Approved as Committee Counsel
KITTUSAMY LLP: Creditors File Involuntary Petition
KUM GANG: Former Workers Awarded $715K in Atty's Fees
LEHMAN BROTHERS: Jan. 2016 Settlement Hearing Set for WMI Suit

LEHMAN BROTHERS: Settles Derivatives Dispute Over Putnam Swaps
LIGHTSTREAM RESOURCES: Moody's Affirms Caa2 CFR & Negative Outlook
LYONS PROFESSIONAL: Former Workers' Judgment Bid Granted
MANISTIQUE PAPERS: Seeks Dismissal of Chapter 11 Case
MF GLOBAL: Corzine, Ex-Officials Settle Suit for $64.5-Mil.

MIG LLC: July 30 Hearing on Bid to Extend Deadline to Remove Suits
MOTORS LIQUIDATION: Bid to Recover Additional Amounts Denied
NAT'L CENTURY FINANCIAL: Dismissal of Poulsen's Suit Recommended
NEW LIFE INT'L: Amends Schedule of Nonpriority Unsecured Claims
NOLAN TOWN CENTER: Case Summary & 15 Top Unsecured Creditors

NORTEL NETWORKS: Bankr. Court Can't Enter Final Judgment v. Avaya
OVERSEAS SHIPHOLDING: Maritime's Rejection Damages Claim Tossed
PATSY FIERRO: Bankruptcy Court Remands Suit to State Court
PILGRIM'S PRIDE: S&P Affirms 'BB+' CCR & Revises Outlook to Stable
PK FAMILY FUN: Case Summary & 11 Largest Unsecured Creditors

PORT AGGREGATES: Plan of Reorganization Confirmed
PRINT HARMONY: Case Summary & 15 Largest Unsecured Creditors
QUICK CASH: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
QUINTO & WILKS: Involuntary Chapter 7 Petition Dismissed
REMAN INDUSTRIES: Case Summary & 14 Largest Unsecured Creditors

RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: Bid to Junk RFC's Suit vs. MortgageIT Denied
ROSSCO HOLDINGS: 5th Cir. Affirms Dismissal of Malpractice Case
SAMUEL MORREALE: Conversion to Chapter 7 Affirmed
SAPPHIRE DEVELOPMENT: Case Dismissed for "Bad Faith" Filing
SHASTA ENTERPRISES: General Partners Directed to File Schedules

SHASTA ENTERPRISES: Hearing on Stay Relief Continued Until Sept. 8
SHERSON GROUP: Seeks U.S. Recognition of Canadian Case
SHOWBOAT CAR WASH: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL: Asks Judge to Approve Auction Date
STANDARD REGISTER: Former Workers' Summary Judgment Bids Denied

SYNTAX-BRILLIAN: 3rd Cir. Revives Sanctions Bid v. Greenberg
VAUGHAN CO: Becker, and Merrie Chappell Firms Withdraw as Counsel
VIACAO AREA SAO PAULO: Seeks U.S. Recognition of Brazilian Case
WE CARE HOME: Case Summary & 8 Largest Unsecured Creditors
WHISPERING PINES: Case Summary & 6 Largest Unsecured Creditors

WHITTEN FOUNDATION: Court Approves McCollister McCleary as Counsel
WILLIS PROPERTIES: Case Summary & 7 Largest Unsecured Creditors
WINDMILL INVESTMENT: Case Summary & 4 Top Unsecured Creditors
XINERGY CORP: Court Denies Jon Nix's Bid to Form Equity Committee
[*] Legal 500 U.S. Recognizes Thompson Hine's Bankruptcy Practice


                            *********

254 CHURCH STREET: Case Summary & 4 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 254 Church Street, LLC
        254 Church Street
        P.O. Box 110
        Poughkeepsie, NY 12602

Case No.: 15-36251

Nature of Business: Single Asset Real Estate

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 7, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of New York (Poughkeepsie)

Judge: Hon. Cecelia G. Morris

Debtor's Counsel: Thomas Genova, Esq.
                  GENOVA & MALIN
                  Hampton Business Center
                  1136 Route 9
                  Wappingers Falls, NY 12590-4332
                  Tel: (845) 298-1600
                  Fax: (845) 298-1265
                  Email: genmallaw@optonline.net

Total Assets: $180,280

Total Liabilities: $1.6 million

The petition was signed by James R. Koltz, managing member.

A list of the Debtor's four largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb15-36251.pdf


AEREO INC: TiVo Makes Pitch to Former Customers
-----------------------------------------------
Stephanie Gleason, writing for The Wall Street Journal, reported
that TiVo, which spent $1 million during the bankruptcy case of
failed TV-streaming service Aereo Inc. to buy trademarks and
customer lists, is now making moves to acquire former Aereo
customers.

According to the report, in emails bearing Aereo's logo to former
customers, TiVo pitched its TiVo Roamio-OTA as a service that was
"conceived, developed and introduced for people just like you."

                          About Aereo Inc.

With headquarters in Boston, Massachusetts, Aereo, Inc., is a
technology company that provided subscribers with the ability to
watch live or "time-shifted" local over-the-air broadcast
television on Internet-connected devices, such as personal
computers, tablet devices, and "smartphones."   Aero provided to
each subscriber access, via the Internet, to individual remote or
micro-antennas and a cloud-based DVR, which were maintained by the
Debtor in facilities within the local market.

Aereo, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
14-13200) in Manhattan, New York, on Nov. 20, 2014.  The Chapter 11
filing came five months after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the
Debtor, with respect to live or contemporaneous transmissions, was
essentially performing as a traditional cable system under the
Copyright Act, and thus was violating broadcasters' copyrights
because it wasn't paying broadcasters any fees.

The Debtor has tapped William R. Baldiga, Esq., at Brown Rudnick
LLP, in New York, as counsel.  The Debtors has also engaged Argus
Management Corp. to provide the services of Lawton W. Bloom as CRO
and Peter Sullivan and Scott Dicus as assistant restructuring
officers.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and notice agent.

The Debtor disclosed $22.2 million in assets and $2.78 million in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed three creditors to serve on
the official committee of unsecured creditors.  Stinson Leonard
Street LLP serves as the Committee's counsel.


AMERICAN HOUSING: 5th Circ. Affirms Templeton Claims Subordination
------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Templeton invested in certain limited partnerships formed
under the auspices of American Housing Foundation, which was in the
business of developing low-income housing projects.  American
Housing Foundation, which issued guaranties of Templeton's
investments, ultimately filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.  Templeton
asserted claims against American Housing Foundation in bankruptcy
based on the guaranties and based on various state law causes of
action related to his investments.  The bankruptcy court issued a
judgment subordinating those claims "pursuant to the provisions of
11 U.S.C. Section 510(b)."  The bankruptcy court also voided, as
preferential, transfers made to Templeton within 90 days of the
bankruptcy filing.  However, the bankruptcy court refused to void
allegedly fraudulent transfers.  The parties cross-appealed to the
district court, which affirmed the bankruptcy court's judgment in
its entirety.  The parties now cross-appeal to the present court.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed
the subordination of Templeton's claim and reversed the bankruptcy
court's rulings on the alleged preferential and fraudulent
transfers and remanded for further proceedings.

The Fifth Circuit first concludes that Templeton's claims are
claims for "damages."  With respect to the "unliquidated claims" --
i.e., those for fraud, breach of fiduciary duties, and
money-had-and-received -- Templeton clearly seeks damages for
injuries resulting from these torts.  Templeton's claims arise from
the purchase of those securities.  "For a claim to 'arise from' the
purchase or sale of a security, there must be some nexus or causal
relationship between the claim and the sale."  The Fifth Circuit
also concludes that there is at least "some nexus or causal
relationship" between Templeton's claims and his purchase of the LP
interests.  Because each of Templeton's claims is a claim for
damages arising from the purchase of securities of AHF's
affiliates, the Fifth Circuit held that Section 510(b) mandates the
subordination of those claims.  Accordingly, the Fifth Circuit
affirmed the bankruptcy court's judgment with respect to
subordination.

The Fifth Circuit reversed the judgment granting the avoidance and
recovery of the $157,500 in purportedly preferential transfers and
remands for further proceedings addressing, inter alia, the
ordinary course of business defense raised by Templeton.  Even
assuming the bankruptcy court was correct in determining that
Templeton's actions did not defraud creditors, this does not answer
the question of whether Templeton was aware (or on inquiry notice)
of AHF's insolvency or fraud, the Fifth Circuit said.  Given that
this determination may hinge in part on questions of credibility
and Templeton's state of mind with respect to various transactions,
it would be prudent for the bankruptcy court to apply this test in
the first instance, the Fifth Circuit ruled.  The Fifth Circuit
therefore reversed and remanded so that the bankruptcy court may
address both issues underlying the applicability of the good faith
defense -- whether Templeton gave value in exchange for the
transfers and whether he did so in good faith.

The appeals case is ROBERT L. TEMPLETON, Appellant Cross-Appellee,
v. WALTER O'CHESKEY, Trustee, Appellee Cross-Appellant, NO.
14-10563 (5th Circ.).

The bankruptcy case is In the Matter of: AMERICAN HOUSING
FOUNDATION, Debtor, Case No. 09-20232 (Bankr. N.D. Tex.).

A full-text copy of the Fifth Circuit's Opinion dated June 8, 2015,
is available at http://is.gd/FGqzcafrom Leagle.com.

                 About American Housing Foundation

Founded as a Texas 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation in 1989,
American Housing Foundation owned and operated more than 12,500
residential units, making AHF one of the nation's largest entities
primarily dedicated to the workforce housing market.  Residents in
AHF properties benefit from significantly below market rental
rates.

Nine alleged creditors of American Housing Foundation filed an
involuntary Chapter 11 petition against AHF (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case
No. 09-20232) on April 21, 2009.  The petitioning creditors were
represented by David R. Langston, Esq., at Mullin, Hoard & Brown,
in Lubbock, Texas.  Robert L. Templeton, who asserted a $5.1
million claim on account of an investment, had the largest claim
among the petitioners.

AHF opposed the involuntary.  On June 11, 2009, AHF filed a
voluntary petition  (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 09-20373) to avoid
potential issues associated with a non-profit entity consenting to
relief in the involuntary action.  Judge Robert L. Jones handled
the case.  Robert Yaquinto, Jr., Esq., at Sherman & Yaquinto, LLP,
represented AHF in its restructuring efforts.  At the time of the
filing, AHF estimated it had assets and debts of $100 million to
$500 million.  Walter O'Cheskey was later appointed as Chapter 11
trustee.  Focus Management Group served as advisor to the trustee.

AHF Development, Ltd., also filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 09-20703) in 2009.  At the time of its
bankruptcy filing, Development had no ongoing business operations.
Several years prior, it served as a "qualified intermediary" for
"1031 exchanges" in connection with transactions with Matt Malouf,
who became a creditor in the case.

The bankruptcy court consolidated the two cases and appointed
Walter O'Cheskey as the Chapter 11 Trustee.  The Court entered its
Order Approving Appointment of Chapter 11 Trustee on April 29,
2010.

On December 7, 2010, the bankruptcy court approved the Second
Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan filed by the Chapter 11 Trustee and
the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  American Housing
Foundation emerged from bankruptcy protection that month.  The
Plan
would pay creditors from the sale of AHF's apartment communities.

Judge Jones dismissed the bankruptcy case of AHF Development,
Ltd.,
in an Aug. 17, 2011 Memorandum Opinion, at the behest of the
United
States Trustee and joined by Attebury Family Partnership, L.P. and
the 2001 Scott D. Rice Trust.


ANNA'S LINENS: SM 101 Seeks to Repossess Santa Maria, Calif. Land
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SM 101 Six, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California, Santa Ana Division, to lift the automatic
stay imposed in the Chapter 11 case of Anna's Linens, Inc., in
order to repossess a property located at 2342 South Bradley Road,
Unit B, in Santa Maria, California.

SM 101's counsel, Gordon G. May, Esq., at Grant, Genovese &
Baratta, LLP, in Irvine, California, asserts that the Debtor has no
right to continue occupying the leases premises as the lease had
already expired on June 11, 2015, and an unlawful detainer
proceeding was already commenced on June 12, 2015.  Mr. May tells
the Court that lease payments have not been made after the filing
of the bankruptcy petition.

Mr. May further asserts that the Debtor has no equity in the
Property and that the Property is not necessary to an effective
reorganization.  Mr. May says that if relief from stay is not
granted with respect to the Property because the Property is the
subject of a lease that may be assumable, SM 101 asks that the
Court grant it adequate protection in the form of regular payments
at the lease rate from the petition date until assumption or
rejection if the lease.

The hearing on the Motion is scheduled on July 28, 2015, at 10:30
am.

SM 101 is represented by:

          Gordon G. May, Esq.
          GRANT, GENOVESE & BARATTA, LLP
          2030 Main Street, Suite 1600
          Irvine, CA 92614
          Telephone: (949)660-1600
          Facsimile: (949)660-6060
          Email: ggm@ggb-law.com
        
                   About Anna's Linens

Anna's Linens is a specialty retailer offering home
textiles,
furnishings and decor at attractive prices.
Headquartered in Costa
Mesa, California, operates a chain of 268
company owned retail
stores throughout 19 states in the United
States (including Puerto
Rico and Washington, D.C.) generates
over $300 million in annual
revenue and employs a workforce of
over 2,500 associates.



Anna's Linens sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
C.D.
Cal. Case No. 15-13008) in Santa Ana, California, on June
14, 2015.

The case is assigned to Judge Theodor Albert. The Debtor
tapped
Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP as counsel. The
Debtor
estimated assets of $50 million to $100 million and debt
of $100
million to $500 million.



The U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 case of Anna's Linens
Inc. appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee
of unsecured creditors.


ARCH COAL: Fitch Cuts Issuer Default Rating to 'C'
--------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has taken the following rating actions on Arch Coal,
Inc.:

-- Issuer Default Rating (IDR) downgraded to 'C' from 'CCC';
-- Senior secured revolving credit facility affirmed at 'B/RR1';
-- Senior secured term loan affirmed at 'B/RR1';
-- Second lien secured notes affirmed at 'B-/RR2';
-- Senior unsecured notes downgraded to 'C/RR5' from 'CCC-/RR5'.

Roughly $5.4 billion in principal amount of debt and commitments
are affected by this action.

The downgrade follows Arch Coal's announcements of exchange offers
which Fitch considers Distressed Debt Exchanges (DDE) in accordance
with Fitch's Distressed Debt Exchange criteria.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Arch Coal benefits from large, well-diversified operations and good
control of low-cost production. Globally, Arch is the sixth largest
coal producer based on volumes. The company sold 134 million tons
of coal in 2014. As of March 31, 2015, roughly 97% of expected 2015
steam coal production volumes are committed and priced. Assuming no
change in sales volume for 2016, about 41% of steam tons are
committed and priced. The company has the third largest coal
reserve position in the U.S. at 5.1 billion tons.

Steam coal demand in the U.S. is currently suffering from heavy
competition from very low natural gas prices, supply has been
disciplined, but stocks are on the high side and prices are soft.
Lack of new coal fired power plant builds and shuttering obsolete
plants constrains growth in the U.S. Globally, both metallurgical
(met) and steam coal markets are in excess supply and prices are
weak. Coal producers have been running for cash with a focus on
reducing costs which has delayed price recovery. In particular,
Fitch believes the hard coking coal bench mark price could average
about $110/tonne (t) and the Newcastle steam coal benchmark could
be below $62/t over the next 12 months versus current prices of
$93/t and $67.80/t respectively. The industry is consolidating,
which should benefit supply/demand dynamics longer term.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Negative: Future developments that may, individually or
collectively, lead to negative rating action include:

-- Lack of material improvement in top line results or absence of

    liquidity enhancements over the next 12-18 months.

Positive: Future developments that may lead to a positive rating
action include:

-- Debt levels materially reduced and free cash flow generation
    that is expected to be positive on average.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Liquidity

At March 31, 2015, cash on hand was $690 million, short-term
investments were $250 million, and Fitch estimates that $250
million was available under the company's credit facilities. The
$200 million accounts receivable facility has a stated maturity in
December 2017. The $250 million revolving credit facility matures
in June 2016. Revolver covenants include a maximum net senior
secured leverage ratio of 5:1 from June 30, 2015 with step-downs
thereafter and a minimum liquidity of $550 million through Dec. 30,
2015. Fitch expects cash and short-term investments to provide
sufficient liquidity through 2017.

Free Cash Flow Burn

Cash burn is expected to continue absent substantial recovery in
met coal prices. Excluding the effects of the exchange, guidance
for cash interest expense is $360 million to $370 million and for
capital expenditure is $140 million to $155 million for 2015. Fitch
expects cash burn of at least $200 million per year through 2017.

Capital Structure

Arch's actions to preserve liquidity since 2012 coupled with three
years of losses have resulted in a debt/capital ratio at 77%. The
exchanges could improve debt/capitalization below 70% and improve
interest coverage although Fitch expects this to remain below 1x
for 2015.

Estimated current scheduled maturities of debt are $34.4 million in
2015, $29.9 million in 2016, $30.1 million in 2017, $1.9 billion in
2018, $1.7 billion in 2019 and $1.5 billion thereafter. The bulk of
the 2018 maturity consists of the senior secured term loan due
2018. Of the amounts due in 2019, the $1 billion 7% senior
unsecured notes, the $375 million 9.875% senior unsecured notes are
subject to an exchange offer. The $1 billion 7.25% senior notes due
2021 is subject to the same offer. The $500 million 7.25% senior
unsecured notes due 2020 are subject to another offer.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- Production, costs, and capital expenditures within guidance
    range for 2015;
-- Coal prices bottom out in 2015 with scant recovery thereafter.




ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE: High Court Asked to Take Cemetery Dispute
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Corrigan, writing for Dow Jones' Daily Bankruptcy Review,
reported that the Supreme Court has been asked to weigh in on a
dispute over whether the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Milwaukee
may shield a $55 million cemetery maintenance trust from hundreds
of alleged clergy sexual abuse victims seeking compensation.

According to the report, a lawyer for the cemetery trust said on
July 7 that the trust filed a petition asking the Supreme Court for
a final ruling on the fate of the cemetery funds.  The move aims to
appeal a March ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Seventh Circuit that a trust created to maintain the Archdiocese of
Milwaukee's cemeteries isn't subject to federal laws protecting
religious freedoms, the report related.

              About the Archdiocese of Milwaukee

The Diocese of Milwaukee was established on Nov. 28, 1843, and
was elevated to an Archdiocese on Feb. 12, 1875, by Pope Pius IX.
The region served by the Archdiocese consists of 4,758 square
miles in southeast Wisconsin which includes counties Dodge, Fond
du Lac, Kenosha, Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Racine, Sheboygan,
Walworth, Washington and Waukesha. There are 657,519 registered
Catholics in the Region.

The Catholic Archdiocese of Milwaukee, in Wisconsin, filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D. Wis. Case
No. 11-20059) on Jan. 4, 2011, to address claims over sexual
abuse by priests on minors.

The Archdiocese became at least the eighth Roman Catholic diocese
in the U.S. to file for bankruptcy to settle claims from current
and former parishioners who say they were sexually molested by
priests.

Daryl L. Diesing, Esq., at Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek S.C., in
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, serves as the Archdiocese's counsel.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in the bankruptcy
case has retained Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as its
counsel, and Howard, Solochek & Weber, S.C., as its local
counsel.

The Archdiocese estimated assets and debts of $10
million to $50 million in its Chapter 11 petition.


ARCHDIOCESE OF ST. PAUL: Sex Abuse Case Remanded to Ramsey Court
----------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge David S. Doty remanded to the Ramsey Court District
Court a sexual abuse case filed against the Archdiocese of St. Paul
and Minneapolis.

The Archdiocese removed the case to the federal district court in
light of its pending Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.  The
plaintiff, whose identity was not disclosed and is identified in
court pleadings as John Doe 107, insisted that his case must be
heard in state court.

The negligence action arises out of Doe's claim that he was
sexually abused by a priest at St. John's Church in Hector,
Minnesota between 1957 and 1960. Some of the alleged abuse occurred
when St. John's was part of the defendant Archdiocese of St. Paul
and Minneapolis, and the rest occurred after St. John's became part
of the newly formed defendant Diocese of New Ulm in 1958.

On November 12, 2013, Doe, now a resident of Colorado, filed a
complaint against defendants in Ramsey County, alleging negligence,
negligent supervision, and negligent retention. The state court
issued several scheduling orders, and the parties engaged in some,
but not much, discovery. Trial was scheduled to begin in January
2016.

On January 16, 2015, the Archdiocese filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code. Shortly thereafter,
the Archdiocese notified the state court that the claims against it
are automatically stayed under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 362(a). Doe plans to
file a proof of claim against the Archdiocese in the bankruptcy
case, but has not yet done so.

On March 27, 2015, the Diocese removed the case to the federal
district court under 28 U.S.C. Section 1452(a), which allows for
the removal of claims related to a bankruptcy case.

A copy of Judge Doty's June 25, 2015 Order is available at
http://is.gd/lOGFkVfrom Leagle.com.

The case is, John Doe 107, Plaintiff, v. Archdiocese of St. Paul
and Minneapolis and The Diocese of New Ulm, Defendants, Civil No.
15-1626(DSD/JJK)(D. Minn.).

Counsel for Plaintiff:

     Patrick W. Noaker, Esq.
     NOAKER LAW FIRM LLC
     333 Washington Avenue North, Suite 300
     Minneapolis, MN 55401

Counsel for Defendants:

     Jennifer R. Larimore, Esq.
     Thomas B. Wieser, Esq.
     John C. Gunderson, Esq.
     MEIER, KENNEDY & QUINN
     445 Minnesota Street, Suite 2200
     St. Paul, MN 55101

                    About Archdiocese of St. Paul

The Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis was originally
established by the Vatican in 1850 and serves a geographical area
consisting of 12 greater Twin Cities metro-area counties in
Minnesota, including Ramsey, Hennepin, Anoka, Carver, Chisago,
Dakota, Goodhue, Le Sueur, Rice, Scott, Washington, and Wright
counties.  There are 187 parishes and approximately 825,000
Catholic individuals in the region.  These individuals and
parishes
are served by 3999 priests and 173 deacons.

The Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis filed for Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Minn. Case No. 15-30125) in Minnesota on
Jan.
16, 2015, saying it has large and growing liabilities related to
child sexual abuse and that its pension obligations are
underfunded.

The Debtor disclosed $45,203,010 in assets and $15,890,460 in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

The Debtor has tapped Briggs and Morgan, P.A., as Chapter 11
counsel; BGA Management LLC d/b/a Alliance Management as financial
advisor; Lindquist & Vennum LLP as attorney.

Eleven other dioceses have commenced Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases
in the United States to settle claims from current and former
parishioners who say they were sexually molested by priests.

U.S. Trustee for Region 12 appointed five creditors to serve on
the
official committee of unsecured creditors.

The U.S. Trustee appointed five creditors to serve on the
Committee
of Parish Creditors.  Ginny Dwyer appointed as the acting
chairperson of the committee until such time as the members can
meet and officially elect their own person.

                           *    *    *

The Debtor's exclusive period for filing a Chapter 11 plan and
disclosure statement ends on Nov. 30, 2015.


ATLANTIC & PACIFIC: 2nd Circ. Affirms Discrimination Suit Dismissal
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed
the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York's judgment granting Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company,
Inc.'s motion to dismiss Naushad Mohammed's employment
discrimination action.

The Second Circuit held that there is no error on the part of the
District Court's holding as Mohammed failed to rebut the
presumption, established by A&P's evidentiary submissions, that he
had received notice of the March 13, 2012, effective date, since
mere denial of receipt is insufficient.  The Second Circuit further
held that the District Court also correctly rejected Mohammed's
argument that his claims survive because A&P engaged in conduct
exempted from discharge by Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code.
Mohammed fails to establish why A&P, a corporate entity, is
susceptible to the Section 523 discharge exemption, the Second
Circuit added.

The appeals case is NAUSHAD MOHAMMED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREAT
ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee, NO.
14-3415 (2nd Circ.).

A full-text copy of the Second Circuit's Summary Order dated June
10, 2015, is available at http://is.gd/MGarX6from Leagle.com.

Chauncey D. Henry, Esq., of Henry Law Group serves as counsel for
Appellant.

Douglas P. Catalano, Esq. --
douglas.catalano@nortonrosefulbright.com -- of Norton Rose
Fulbright US LLP serves as counsel for Appellee.

                  About Atlantic and Pacific

Funded in 1859, The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
(A&P), headquartered in Montvale, N.J., is a supermarket chain
operating 301 supermarkets under the A&P, The Food Emporium,
Pathmark, Superfresh, Waldbaums and Foodbasics banners and 18
liquor stores in the Northeast US concentrated in the New York /
New Jersey / Pennsylvania markets.  The company's annual sales are
about $5.8 billion.

A&P and its affiliates filed Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case No. 10-24549) on Dec. 12, 2010, in White Plains, New York.
Before filing for bankruptcy in 2010, A&P operated 429 stores in
eight states and the District of Columbia under the following
trade names: A&P, Waldbaum's, Pathmark, Pathmark Sav-a-Center,
Best Cellars, The Food Emporium, Super Foodmart, Super Fresh and
Food Basics.  A&P had 41,000 employees prior to the bankruptcy
filing.

In its petition, A&P reported total assets of $2.5 billion and
liabilities of $3.2 billion as of Sept. 11, 2010.

Paul M. Basta, Esq., James H.M. Sprayregen, Esq., and Ray C.
Schrock, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, in New York, and James J.
Mazza, Jr., Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in Chicago, Illinois,
served as counsel to the Debtors.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC
acted as the claims and notice agent.  Lazard Freres & Co. LLC
served as the financial advisor.  Huron Consulting Group served as
management consultant.  Dennis F. Dunne, Esq., Matthew S. Barr,
Esq., and Abhilash M. Raval, Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley &
McCloy LLP, represented the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors.

The Bankruptcy Court entered an order Feb. 27, 2012, confirming a
First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization filed Feb. 17, 2012.
A&P consummated its financial restructuring and emerged from
Chapter 11 as a privately held company in March 2012.

A&P sold or closed stores during the bankruptcy proceedings.  It
emerged from bankruptcy with 320 supermarkets.  Among others, A&P
sold 12 Super-Fresh stores in the Baltimore-Washington area for
$37.83 million, plus the value of inventory.  Thirteen other
locations didn't attract buyers at auction and were closed mid-
July 2011.

Mount Kellett Capital Management LP, The Yucaipa Companies LLC and
investment funds managed by Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P.,
provided $490 million in debt and equity financing to sponsor
A&P's reorganization plan and complete its balance sheet
restructuring.  JP Morgan and Credit Suisse arranged a
$645 million exit financing facility.

                           *     *     *

In April 2014, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services revised its
outlook on Montvale, N.J.-based The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea
Co. (A&P) to developing from negative.  At the same time, S&P
affirmed all ratings, including the 'CCC' corporate credit rating.
The 'CCC' corporate credit rating reflects S&P's view that the
company's overall profits may still be vulnerable to continued
sales declines over the next year, which could strain the
company's liquidity.  S&P also view the company's financial risk
profile as "highly leveraged" and business risk profile as
"vulnerable."

In February 2014, Moody's Investors Service affirmed the company's
Caa2 corporate family rating and Caa2-PD probability of default
rating.  The Caa2 corporate family rating reflects A&P's weak
operating performance, very weak credit metrics and Moody's
opinion that A&P's cash interest coverage and free cash flow will
remain weak over the next year.

The TCR, on Oct. 31, 2014, reported that Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services withdrew its ratings on The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea
Co. Inc., including its 'CCC' corporate credit rating, at the
company's request.  At the time of the withdrawal the outlook was
developing.


BEHLING DAIRY: Wins Approval of First Amended Plan
--------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Frank L. Kurtz entered Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law confirming the First Amended Plan of
Reorganization filed in the Chapter 11 case of Behling Dairy
Management, Inc.  The Court also approved the Stipulations between
Columbia State Bank and the Debtor, Zions Agricultural Finance/U.S.
Bank and the Debtor, and the Unsecured Creditors Committee and the
Debtor.

The Debtor's First Amended Plan of Reorganization was filed January
14, 2015.  The Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Washington held a telephone conference on June 1, 2015, to consider
approval of the Plan.

A copy of the Court's Bankruptcy Judge Frank L. Kurtz entered
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law dated June 24, 2015, is
available at http://is.gd/WMlliLfrom Leagle.com.

Behling Dairy Management, Inc., based in Mattawa, Wash., filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D. Wash. Case No.
13-04206) on October 23, 2013.  The Debtor listed $1 million to $10
million in both assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed by
Jeffrey Behling, president.  The Hon. Frank L Kurtz presides over
the case.

The Debtor is represented by:

     James P Hurley, Esq.
     HURLEY & LARA
     411 N Second Street
     Yakima, WA 98901
     Tel: 509 248-4282
     Fax: 509 575-5661
     Email: jamesphurley@hotmail.com

The Unsecured Creditors Committee is represented by:

     Paul M. Larson, Esq.
     LARSON BERG & PERKINS PLLC
     105 North Third Street
     Yakima, WA 98907
     Tel: 509 457-1515

Columbia State Bank is represented by:

     David W. Criswell, Esq.
     BALL JANIK LLP
     101 SW Main St #1100
     Portland, OR 97204
     Tel: 503-228-2525
     E-mail: dcriswell@balljanik.com

Attorneys for Zions Agricultural Finance/U.S. Bank:

     Brian Walker, Esq.
     OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE, PLLC
     One Fifth Street, Suite 200
     Wenatchee, WA 98801
     Tel: (509) 662-1954
     Fax: (509) 663-1553
     E-mail: bwalker@omwlaw.com


BHMDF LTD: Case Summary & 9 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: BHMDF, Ltd.
        P.O. Box 531873
        Grand Prairie, TX 75053

Case No.: 15-42657

Nature of Business: Single Asset Real Estate

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Texas (Ft. Worth)

Judge: Hon. Russell F. Nelms

Debtor's Counsel: Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
                  ERIC A. LIEPINS, P.C.
                  12770 Coit Rd., Suite 1100
                  Dallas, TX 75251
                  Tel: (972) 991-5591
                  Email: eric@ealpc.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Riva Smith-Aguirre, president of general
partner.

A list of the Debtor's nine largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb15-42657.pdf


BOLLINGER INVESTMENT: Case Summary & 5 Top Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Bollinger Investment Partners, Ltd.
           dba Top of the Hill RV Resort
        255 Wildlife Trail
        Bandera, TX 78003

Case No.: 15-51618

Nature of Business: Single Asset Real Estate

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Texas (San Antonio)

Judge: Hon. Craig A. Gargotta

Debtor's Counsel: Dean William Greer, Esq.
                  2929 Mossrock, Suite 117
                  San Antonio, TX 78230
                  Tel: 210-342-7100
                  Fax: 210-342-3633
                  Email: dwgreer@sbcglobal.net

Total Assets: $3.1 million

Total Liabilities: $1.2 million

The petition was signed by John T. Bollinger, Jr., Mgr of GP,
Bollinger Mgmt, LLC.

A list of the Debtor's five largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb15-51618.pdf


BOOMERANG TUBE: Hires Debevoise as Special Corporate Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Boomerang Tube, LLC and its debtor-affiliates seek authorization
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to
employ Debevoise & Plimpton LLP as special corporate and
transactions counsel, nunc pro tunc to the June 9, 2015 petition
date.

The Debtors require Debevoise to render necessary services relating
to various corporate and financing matters during the pendency of
these cases, including specifically:

  -- the consummation of a plan of reorganization in conjunction
     with Young Conaway, including negotiating and drafting of
     appropriate corporate documents with respect thereto;

  -- the Debtors' debtor-in-possession and exit financings; and

  -- general corporate matters.

Debevoise will be paid at these hourly rates:

       My Chi To, Partner              $1,195
       Ramya Tiller, Associate         $840
       Patricia Teixeira, Associate    $825
       Nick S. Kaluk, III, Associate   $720
       Partners                        $900–$1,250
       Counsel                         $850–$1,065
       Associates                      $465–$885
       Paraprofessionals               $195–$380

Debevoise will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

My Chi To, partner of Debevoise, assured the Court that the firm is
a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse
to the Debtors and their estates.

The Court for the District of Delaware will hold a hearing on the
application on July 10, 2015, at 12:00 noon.  Objections were due
July 6, 2015.

Debevoise can be reached at:

       My Chi To, Esq.
       DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP
       919 Third Avenue
       New York, NY 10022
       Tel: +1 212 909 7425
       Fax: +1 212 909 6836
       E-mail: mcto@debevoise.com

                        About Boomerang Tube

Boomerang Tube, LLC, is a manufacturer of welded Oil Country
Tubular Goods ("OCTG") in the United States.  OCTG are used by
drillers in exploration and production of oil and natural gas and
consist of drill pipe, casing and tubing.  Boomerang has corporate
offices in Chesterfield, Missouri and manufacturing facilities in
Liberty, Texas, strategically located near major steel production
centers and end-user markets.  With a 487,000 square foot plant
that houses two mills and heat treat lines and a contingent 119
acres, these facilities constitute the second largest alloy OCTG
mill in North America.  Access Tubulars, LLC, owns 81% of the
equity interests in Boomerang.

Boomerang Tube and its subsidiaries BTCSP LLC and BT Financing
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
15-11247) on June 9, 2015, with a deal with lenders on a balance
sheet restructuring that would convert $214 million of debt to 100%
of the common stock of the reorganized company.

The cases are assigned to Judge Mary F. Walrath.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, as
attorneys; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC, as financial advisor; and
Donlin, Recano & Co., Inc., as claims and noticing agent.

On June 30, 2015, the Debtor filed a bankruptcy-exit plan and
explanatory disclosure statement.  A hearing to approve the
Disclosure Statement is set for August 11.


BOOMERANG TUBE: July 10 Hearing on Zolfo Cooper Employment
----------------------------------------------------------
Boomerang Tube, LLC and its debtor-affiliates seek authorization
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to
employ Zolfo Cooper Management, LLC to provide interim management
services and designate Kevin Nystrom as CRO, interim CEO and
President, nunc pro tunc to the June 9, 2015 petition date.

Mr. Nystrom will continue to serve as the Debtors' CRO, Interim
CEO, and President, and Zolfo Cooper will assign Associate
Directors to perform other services as needed pursuant to the
Agreement. Zolfo Cooper and Mr. Nystrom will lead the Debtors'
restructuring efforts as directed by the Debtors' Board of
Directors. Some of the specific responsibilities will include:

   (a) leading and directing the implementation of the Debtors'
       business plan;

   (b) meeting and negotiating with creditors and their advisors;

   (c) evaluating restructuring alternatives;

   (d) reviewing and modifying the 13-week cash flow forecast and
       long-term business plan;

   (e) continued development of a Chapter 11 plan and obtaining
       confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan; and

   (f) such other restructuring areas and issues as are
       customarily performed by a chief restructuring officer,
       chief executive officer and president.

As set forth in the Agreement, Zolfo Cooper's, Mr. Nystrom's, and
the Associate Directors' compensation shall consist of the
following:

   -- Standard Hourly Rates: Zolfo Cooper's fees for the services
      will be based on the hours charged at their standard hourly
      rates that are in effect when the services are rendered;
      Zolfo Cooper's rates generally are revised semiannually.
      The billing rates for professionals who may be assigned to
      This engagement in effect as of January 1, 2015, are as
      follows:

      Managing Directors      $775-$925
      Associate Directors     $265-$770
      Support Personnel       $60-$310

   -- Expenses: Reimbursement of Mr. Nystrom, Associate Directors,

      and Zolfo Cooper's reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
      including, but not limited to, costs of travel,
      reproduction, legal counsel (including legal counsel
      retained to draft and enforce the Agreement), any applicable

      state sales or excise tax, and other direct expenses.

   -- Advance Payments: The Debtors provided pre-petition advance
      payments throughout the course of the pre-petition
      engagement. Zolfo Cooper applied pre-petition fees and
      expenses against the advance payments.

   -- Retainer: The Debtors provided a pre-petition retainer of
      $100,000.

Kevin Nystrom, managing director of Zolfo Cooper, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

The Court for the District of Delaware will hold a hearing on the
application on July 10, 2015, at 12:00 noon.  Objections were due
July 6, 2015.

Zolfo Cooper can be reached at:

       Kevin Nystrom
       ZOLFO COOPER MANAGEMENT, LLC
       Grace Building
       1114 Avenue of the Americas
       41st Floor
       New York, NY 10036
       Tel: (212) 561-4025
       E-mail: knystrom@zolfocooper.com

                        About Boomerang Tube

Boomerang Tube, LLC, is a manufacturer of welded Oil Country
Tubular Goods ("OCTG") in the United States.  OCTG are used by
drillers in exploration and production of oil and natural gas and
consist of drill pipe, casing and tubing.  Boomerang has corporate
offices in Chesterfield, Missouri and manufacturing facilities in
Liberty, Texas, strategically located near major steel production
centers and end-user markets.  With a 487,000 square foot plant
that houses two mills and heat treat lines and a contingent 119
acres, these facilities constitute the second largest alloy OCTG
mill in North America.  Access Tubulars, LLC, owns 81% of the
equity interests in Boomerang.

Boomerang Tube and its subsidiaries BTCSP LLC and BT Financing
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
15-11247) on June 9, 2015, with a deal with lenders on a balance
sheet restructuring that would convert $214 million of debt to 100%
of the common stock of the reorganized company.

The cases are assigned to Judge Mary F. Walrath.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, as
attorneys; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC, as financial advisor; and
Donlin, Recano & Co., Inc., as claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee overseeing the Debtor's Chapter 11 case has
appointed five creditors to serve on an official committee of
unsecured creditors.

On June 30, 2015, the Debtor filed a bankruptcy-exit plan and
explanatory disclosure statement.  A hearing to approve the
Disclosure Statement is set for August 11.


BOOMERANG TUBE: Taps Young Conaway as Bankruptcy Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Boomerang Tube, LLC and its debtor-affiliates seek authorization
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to
employ Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as bankruptcy counsel,
nunc pro tunc to the June 9, 2015 petition date.

The Debtors require Young Conaway to:

   (a) provide legal advice with respect to the Debtors' powers
       and duties as debtors-in-possession in the continued
       operation of their business and management of their
       properties;

   (b) pursue confirmation of a plan and approval of a disclosure
       statement;

   (c) prepare, on behalf of the Debtors, necessary applications,
       motions, answers, orders, reports and other legal papers;

   (d) appear in Court and to protect the interests of the Debtors

       before the Court; and

   (e) perform all other legal services for the Debtors which may
       be necessary and proper in these proceedings.

Young Conaway will be paid at these hourly rates:

       Robert S. Brady              $795
       Edmon L. Morton              $650
       Sean M. Beach                $610
       Margaret Whiteman Greecher   $460
       Ryan M. Bartley              $420
       Norah M. Roth-Moore          $290
       Michelle Smith (paralegal)   $215

Young Conaway will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Young Conaway received an initial retainer in the amount of
$150,000, which was paid on March 19, 2015, in connection with the
restructuring planning and preparation of initial documents and as
security for Young Conaway's post-petition representation of the
Debtors. In addition, a part of the Retainer has been applied to
additional outstanding balances existing as of the Petition Date of
$138,017.56 in fees and $7,768.60 in costs, leaving a retainer
balance of $11,798.11. The remainder will constitute an evergreen
retainer as security for post-petition services and expenses.

Robert S. Brady, vice chairman and partner of Young Conaway,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their
estates.

The Court for the District of Delaware will hold a hearing on the
application on July 10, 2015, at 12:00 noon.  Objections were due
July 6, 2015.

Young Conaway can be reached at:

       Robert S. Brady, Esq.
       YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
       Rodney Square
       1000 North King Street
       Wilmington, DE 19801
       Tel: (302) 571-6690
       Fax: (302) 576-3283
       E-mail: rbrady@ycst.com

                        About Boomerang Tube

Boomerang Tube, LLC, is a manufacturer of welded Oil Country
Tubular Goods ("OCTG") in the United States.  OCTG are used by
drillers in exploration and production of oil and natural gas and
consist of drill pipe, casing and tubing.  Boomerang has corporate
offices in Chesterfield, Missouri and manufacturing facilities in
Liberty, Texas, strategically located near major steel production
centers and end-user markets.  With a 487,000 square foot plant
that houses two mills and heat treat lines and a contingent 119
acres, these facilities constitute the second largest alloy OCTG
mill in North America.  Access Tubulars, LLC, owns 81% of the
equity interests in Boomerang.

Boomerang Tube and its subsidiaries BTCSP LLC and BT Financing
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
15-11247) on June 9, 2015, with a deal with lenders on a balance
sheet restructuring that would convert $214 million of debt to 100%
of the common stock of the reorganized company.

The cases are assigned to Judge Mary F. Walrath.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, as
attorneys; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC, as financial advisor; and
Donlin, Recano & Co., Inc., as claims and noticing agent.

On June 30, 2015, the Debtor filed a bankruptcy-exit plan and
explanatory disclosure statement.  A hearing to approve the
Disclosure Statement is set for August 11.


BROOKLYN RENAISSANCE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Brooklyn Renaissance, LLC
        P.O. Box 3294
        Church Street Station
        New York, NY 10008

Case No.: 15-43122

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn)

Judge: Hon. Nancy Hershey Lord

Debtor's Counsel: Jonathan S Pasternak, Esq.
                  DELBELLO DONNELLAN WEINGARTEN
                  WISE & WIEDERKEHR, LLP
                  One North Lexington Avenu
                  White Plains, NY 10601
                  Tel: (914) 681-0200
                  Fax: (914) 684-0288
                  Email: jpasternak@ddw-law.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Debts: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by James McGown, managing member.

The Debtor did not include a list of its largest unsecured
creditors when it filed the petition.


BRUGNARA PROPERTIES: Seeks Dismissal of Chapter 11 Case
-------------------------------------------------------
Brugnara Properties, VI, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, to dismiss
its Chapter 11 Case.

Matthew D. Metzger, Esq., at Belvedere Legal, PC, in San Mateo,
California, tells the Court that the Debtor filed its emergency
Chapter 11 case to stop a foreclosure sale on the real property of
the estate commonly known as 224 Sea Cliff Ave., in San Francisco,
California.  He relates that the Debtor's intention was to
refinance Saxe Mortgage Company's junior secured lien but the
Debtor would liquidate the property in the event the Debtor was
unable to find a lender that would agree to refinance the Saxe
junior lien.

Katherine Brugnara, the Debtor's Interim President, has identified
a new lender that will agree to refinance Saxe's secured junior
lien and Ms. Brugnara wishes to consummate a refinancing agreement,
provided the Court agrees to dismiss the bankruptcy case.  Mr.
Metzger says he was instructed by Ms. Brugnara to file the instant
motion to dismiss case as the petition no longer serves any
bankruptcy purpose.

The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is scheduled on July 17, 2015,
at 10:00 am.

The Debtor is represented by:

          Matthew D. Metzger, Esq.
          BELVEDERE LEGAL, PC
          1777 Borel Place, Suite 314
          San Mateo, CA 94402
          Telephone: (415)513-5980
          Facsimile: (415)513-5985
          Email: mmetzger@belvederelegal.com
                 
               About Brugnara Properties VI

Brugnara Properties VI filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
N.D.
Cal. Case No. 14-31867) in San Francisco, California, on
Dec. 31,
2014, without stating a reason.



On January 2, 2015, Judge Hannah L. Blumensteil of the
U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
California
transferred the Chapter 11 case of Brugnara Properties
to Judge
Dennis Montali.



The Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and
less
than $10 million in debt.



The Debtor only filed the Schedule D - Creditors Holding
Secured
Claims in its Schedules of Assets and Liabilities.



The Debtor disclosed that Wells Fargo Home Mortgage is owed
$6.15
million on a first note secured by the Debtor's property,
and Saxe
Mortgage Co. is owed $1.7 million on a second
note.


The deadline for filing claims is May 4, 2015.



The Debtor is represented by Erik G. Babcock, Esq., at Law
Office
of Erik G. Babcock, in Oakland, California.


BTB CORPORATION: Bankruptcy Filing Stays Rodriguez Suit
-------------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Marcos E. Lopez in Puerto Rico ruled that a
lawsuit against BTB Corporation remains stayed in view of BTB's
Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing.  The lawsuit may proceed as to the
other non-debtor defendants.

The case is, FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ REYES, Plaintiff, v. BTB
CORPORATION, et al., Defendants, v. SUPER ASPHALT PAVEMENT CORP.,
Third-Party Defendants, Civil No. 14-1726 (MEL)(D.P.R.).

Judge Lopez also ruled that and Curbelo & Rullan Consulting
Engineer's crossclaim against BTB Corp. are stayed. All proceedings
regarding those claims, including discovery, shall be stayed, as
well. Additionally, Curbelo & Rullan Consulting Engineer's
crossclaim against MAPFRE, as insurer of BTB Corp., shall be
stayed. All other claims, crossclaims, and third-party claims,
including those brought by BTB Corp. and those against MAPFRE, as
insurer of Christopher Concepcion Lopez, shall remain active.

A copy of Judge Lopez's June 24, 2015 Opinion and Order is
available at http://is.gd/ApWPlyfrom Leagle.com.

                       About BTB Corporation

BTB Corporation sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.P.R. Case
No. 15-03681) in Old San Juan, Puerto Rico, on May 17, 2015. Samuel
Lizardi signed the petition as interim president.  The Debtor
disclosed total assets of $16.5 million and total liabilities of
$13.2 million.

BTB said it sought bankruptcy protection as it is unable to meet
obligations as they mature, and creditors are threatening suit and
have threatened to undertake steps to obtain possession of its
assets.

The Debtor tapped Alexis Fuentes Hernandez, Esq., at Fuentes Law
Offices, LLC, as its counsel.


CLASSIC CAR WASH: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
---------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Classic Car Wash of Jacksonville, Inc.
        1635 South 3d Street
        Jacksonville Beach, FL 32250

Case No.: 15-03032

Nature of Business: Single Asset Real Estate

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida (Jacksonville)

Debtor's Counsel: Brett A Mearkle, Esq.
                  MEARKLE TRUEBLOOD ADAM, PL
                  218 N. Broad Street
                  Jacksonville, FL 32202
                  Tel: 904-352-1342
                  Fax: 904-800-1058
                  Email: bmearkle@mtalawyers.com

Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by David Danzeisen, president.

The Debtor did not include a list of its largest unsecured
creditors when it filed the petition.


COLT DEFENSE: Seeks July 29 Extension of Schedules Filing Date
--------------------------------------------------------------
Colt Holding Company, LLC, and its affiliated debtors ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to extend their
deadline to file their schedules of assets and liabilities and
statements of financial affairs to July 29, 2015.

Jason M. Madron, Esq., at Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., in
Wilmington, Delaware, tells the Court that sufficient cause exists
to extend the deadline for the Debtors to file their Schedules and
Statements.  He says that given the amount of work entailed in
completing their Schedules and Statements, and the competing
demands upon the Debtors' personnel to address critical operational
matters during the initial postpetition period, the Debtors will
not be in a position to properly and accurately complete the
Schedules and Statements within the required 30-day period.

The Debtors are represented by:

          Mark D. Collins, Esq.
          Jason M. Madron, Esq.
          RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
          One Rodney Square
          920 North King Street
          Wilmington, Delaware 19801
          Telephone: (302)651-7700
          Facsimile: (302)651-7701
          Email: collins@rlf.com
                 madron@rlf.com

             -- and --

          John J. Rapisardi, Esq.
          Peter Friedman, Esq.
          Joseph Zujkowski, Esq.
          Diana M. Perez, Esq.
          O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP
          Times Square Tower
          Seven Times Square
          New York, New York 10036
          Telephone: (212)326-2000
          Facsimile: (212)326-2061
          Email: jrapisardi@omm.com
                 pfriedman@omm.com
                 jzujkowski@omm.com
                 dperez@omm.com

               About Colt Holding

Colt Defense LLC is one of the world's oldest and most
iconic
designers, developers, and manufacturers of firearms for
military,
law enforcement, personal defense, and recreational
purposes and
was founded over 175 years ago by Samuel Colt, who
patented the
first commercial successful revolving cylinder
firearm in 1836 and
began supplying U.S. and international
military customers with
firearms in 1847. Colt is incorporated in
Delaware and
headquartered in West Hartford, Connecticut.



In 1992, Colt Manufacturing Company, then the principal
operating
subsidiary, filed chapter 11 petitions in the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut. An investment by
Zilkha & Co. allowed CMC to confirm a chapter 11 plan and emerge
from bankruptcy in 1994. 



Sometime after 1994, majority ownership of the Company transitioned
from Zilkha & Co. to Sciens Capital Management.



On June 12, 2015, Colt's previously announced exchange
offer,
consent solicitation and solicitation of acceptances of
a
prepackaged plan of reorganization, dated April 14, 2015,
as
supplemented, with respect to its $250 million in 8.75%
Senior
Notes due 2017 expired. The conditions to the exchange
offer, the
consent solicitation and the prepackaged plan of
reorganization
were not satisfied, and those conditions were not
waived by Colt. 
Colt's restructuring support agreement with
Marblegate Special
Opportunities Master Fund, L.P. and Morgan
Stanley Senior Funding,
Inc., the Company's senior secured term
loan lenders, requires it
to file for Chapter 11
bankruptcy.



Accordingly, Colt Holding Company LLC and nine
affiliates,
including Colt Defense LLC, on June 14, 2015, filed
voluntary
petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 15-11296) for
relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code to pursue a sale
of the assets as a going concern. Colt Defense estimated $100
million to $500
million in assets and debt.



The Debtors tapped Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., and O'Melveny &
Myers LLP, as attorneys, and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC
as
claims and noticing agent. Perella Weinberg Partners L.P.
is
acting as financial advisor of the Company, and Mackinac
Partners
LLC is acting as its restructuring advisor.



Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as agent under the
$13.33
million Term DIP Loan Agreement, is represented by Pryor
Cashman
LLP's Eric M. Hellige, Esq.; and Willkie Farr & Gallagher
LLP's
Leonard Klingbaum, Esq. 



Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as agent under the
$6.67
million Senior DIP Credit Agreement, is represented by
Holland &
Knight LLP's Joshua M. Spencer, Esq.; Stroock & Stroock
& Lavan
LLP's Brett Lawrence, Esq.; and Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt
LLP's
Richard Borins, Esq., and Tracy Sandler, Esq.



                    *     *     *



Colt's equity sponsor, Sciens Capital Management, has agreed to act
as a stalking horse bidder in the proposed asset sale. Details of
the deal were not provided in Colt's news statement announcing the
Chapter 11 filing. Colt, however, said it would be
soliciting
competing bids and has appointed an independent
committee of its
board of managers to manage the process and
evaluate bids. Colt
expects to complete the entire Chapter 11
process in 60-90 days.



DOTS LLC: Court Approves Sixth Amended to DIP Credit Facility
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Donald H. Steckroth signed off a consent order
approving a sixth amendment to Dots, LLC, et al.'s DIP credit
agreement.  The Debtors are authorized, until the termination date
to request extensions of credit solely in accordance with the Fifth
Amendment and the approved budget.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 24, 2014, the
Debtors were authorized to enter into a senior secured,
superpriority postpetition credit facility from Salus Capital
Partners, LLC, as administrative and collateral agent, and other
lenders in the aggregate amount of up to $36,000,000.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors have outstanding secured debt
owed to senior lender Salus Capital Partners, LLC, of which $14.5
million remains outstanding under a revolving facility and $16.1
million is owed under a term facility.  The Debtors also have not
less than $10.35 million outstanding under a subordinated term loan
agreement with Irving Place Capital Partners III L.P., Irving Place
Capital III Feeder Fund, L.P., Irving Place Capital Partners III
Coinvestors L.P.

Other salient terms of the DIP facility are:

   -- The postpetition credit facility will consist of (i) a
revolving loan in the maximum principal amount of $20,000,000 and
(ii) a term loan in the amount of $16,000,000.

   -- All obligations under the DIP facility will constitute
administrative expense of the loan parties.  Subject only to the
carve-out, the administrative claim will have priority over any and
all administrative expense claims.

   -- There will be a carve-out of $350,000 with respect to
counsel for the Debtors and $50,000 with respect to allowed
professional fees of the Committee's case professionals.

   -- Interest pricing would be LIBO Rate + 8.50% for the DIP
revolver and LIBO Rate + 9.25% for the DIP Term Loan.

   -- Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an Event of
Default, the interest rate and the letter of credit fees will be
increased to 4% above the amounts otherwise applicable.

                          About DOTS LLC

Dots is a retailer of fashionable clothing, accessories, and
footwear for price-conscious women.  Dots provides missy and plus
size choices to fashion savvy 25 to 35 year old women at
approximately 400 retail stores throughout the Midwest, East, and
South United States.  Dots' workforce includes 3,500 individuals in
their stores, distribution center, and corporate headquarters.

Dots, LLC, and its affiliates sought bankruptcy protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Lead Case No.
14-11016) on Jan. 20, 2014, to sell some or all of their assets.

Lowenstein Sandler LLP serves as counsel to the Debtors.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is financial advisor and investment
banker.  Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., is the claims and notice
agent.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors have outstanding secured debt
owed to senior lender Salus Capital Partners, LLC, of which $14.5
million remains outstanding under a revolving facility and $16.1
million is owed under a term facility.  The Debtors also have not
less than $17 million outstanding under subordinated term loan
agreements with Irving Place Capital Partners III L.P. ("IPC") and
related entities.  Moreover, the Debtors have aggregate unsecured
debts of $47.0 million.  The Debtors disclosed $51,574,560 in
assets and $85,442,656 in liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

Salus, the prepetition senior lender and the DIP lender, is
represented by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP.  The prepetition
subordinated lenders are represented by Okin Hollander & DeLuca,
LLP.

The Company has arranged to borrow $36 million to keep operating as
it reorganizes under court protection.

Otterbourg P.C. serves as counsel to the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors; and FTI Consulting, Inc., serves as its
financial advisor.



EMPRESAS OMAJEDE: BPPR Directed to Amend Late Fees Claim
--------------------------------------------------------
Empresas Omajede, Inc., objected to Proof of Claim Number 5 Filed
by Banco Popular de Puerto Rico.  The objection hinges on the
interpretation of certain contractual clauses regarding the late
fees and default rate (or additional late fees) which are included
in the three commercial loans that the Debtor has outstanding with
BPPR.

Judge Enrique S. Lamoutte of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Puerto Rico granted the Debtor's Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment, holding that for all the three loan agreements in
controversy only the late fee may be applied after a 10-day period.
The default interest or additional late fees are not applicable in
the instant case, Judge Lamoutte said.  Further, the Court directed
BPPR to file an amended proof of claim within 14 days detailing the
amounts owed pursuant to the court's Opinion and Order.

The case is IN RE: EMPRESAS OMAJEDE INC., CHAPTER 11, Debtor, CASE
NO. 12-10113 (ESL)(Bankr. D.P.R.).

A full-text copy of Judge Lamoutte's Opinion and Order dated June
8, 2015, is available at http://is.gd/vmoW83from Leagle.com.

                       About Empresas Omajede

Empresas Omajede, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.P.R.
Case No. 12-10113) in Old San Juan, Puerto Rico, on Dec. 21, 2012.
Nelson E. Galarza serves as financial advisor.

The Debtor disclosed $16,718,614 in assets and $4,935,883 in
liabilities in its schedules.  The Debtor is a Single Asset Real
Estate as defined in 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(51B) with principal assets
located at La Ectronica Building, 1608 Bori St., in San Juan,
Puerto Rico.


ENERGY CONVERSION: Denial of Priority Treatment Request Affirmed
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Nancy G. Edmunds of the United States District Court for
Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, affirmed a
Bankruptcy Court's January 30, 2015 order denying John Murphy's
request for priority treatment of his breach of fiduciary duty
claim against The Energy Conversion Devices.

John Murphy argues that the Bankruptcy Court erred by holding that
his claim has the same priority as the equity interests identified
under class 5 of the confirmed liquidation plan.  According to
Murphy, because his claim does not "arise from the purchase or sale
of a security", it is not subject to subordination under Section
510(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.  In the alternative, Murphy
maintains that his claim should be treated as an allowed
"administrative expense" as part of the necessary costs of
preserving the estate.

Judge Edmunds found that (1) the Bankruptcy Court properly
construed and applied section 510(b) and (c) of the Bankruptcy
Code, and (2) Murphy, as an equity investor, is not entitled to an
administrative expense claim stemming from a decline in stock
value.  The Bankruptcy Court's January 30, 2015 order is thus
affirmed.

The case is JOHN AUSTIN MURPHY, Appellant, v. JOHN MADDEN,
LIQUIDATION TRUSTEE OF THE ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES LIQUIDATION
TRUST, Appellee, CASE NO. 15-10554 (E.D. Mich.).

A full-text copy of Judge Edmunds' Opinion and Order dated June 9,
2015, is available at http://is.gd/J5Bxo9from Leagle.com.

John Austin Murphy, Appellant, Pro Se.

Robert S. Hertzberg, Esq. -- hertzbergr@pepperlaw.com -- of Pepper
Hamilton serves as counsel for Appellee John Madden, Liquidating
Trustee.

                      About Energy Conversion

Energy Conversion Devices -- http://energyconversiondevices.com/
-- has a renowned 51 year history since its formation in Detroit,
Michigan and has been a pioneer in materials science and renewable
energy technology development.  The company has been awarded over
500 U.S. patents and international counterparts for its
achievements.  ECD's United Solar wholly owned subsidiary has been
a global leader in building-integrated and rooftop photovoltaics
for over 25 years.  The company manufactures, sells and installs
thin-film solar laminates that convert sunlight to clean,
renewable energy using proprietary technology.

ECD filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No.
12-43166) on Feb. 14, 2012.  Judge Thomas J. Tucker presides over
the case.  Aaron M. Silver, Esq., Judy B. Calton, Esq., and Robert
B. Weiss, Esq., at Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn LLP, in
Detroit, Michigan, represent the Debtor as counsel.  The Debtor
estimated assets and debts of between $100 million and $500
million as of the petition date.

The petition was signed by William Christopher Andrews, chief
financial officer and executive vice president.

Affiliate United Solar Ovonic LLC filed a separate Chapter 11
petition on the same day (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 12-43167).
Affiliate Solar Integrated Technologies, Inc., filed a petition
for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.
Mich. Case No. 12-43169).

An official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.  Foley and Lardner, LLP represents the Committee.
Scouler & Company, LLC, serves as financial advisor.

The company had estimated in court papers that it was worth
$986 million, based on nearly $800 million of investment in the
manufacturing unit.

The Debtors canceled an auction to sell USO as a going concern and
discontinued the court-approved sale process after failing to
receive an acceptable qualified bid by the bid deadline.  Quarton
Partners served as the companies' investment banker.  The Debtors
also hired auction services provider Hilco Industrial to prepare
for an orderly sale of the companies' assets.

In August 2012, the Debtors won confirmation of their Second
Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation.  The Plan was declared
effective in September 2012.  Under the Plan, unsecured creditors
owed up to $337 million in claims were to expect a recovery
between 50.1% and 59.3%.  The Plan creates a trust to sell
remaining assets and distribute proceeds in the order of priority
laid out in bankruptcy law.


ENERGY FUTURE: Bondholders Warned About Desire for Oncor
--------------------------------------------------------
Peg Brickley, writing for Dow Jones' Daily Bankruptcy Review,
reported that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has jumped into the
fracas over the fate of Energy Future Holdings Corp., warning
bondholders to rein in their rhetoric in bankruptcy court.

According to the report, in his role as counsel to Texas's Public
Utility Commission, Mr. Paxton warned bondholder lawyer Thomas
Lauria not to presume regulators will sign off on a
bondholder-backed restructuring plan focused on Energy Future's
valuable stake in Oncor Electric Delivery Co., the state's largest
regulated electric delivery business.

                        About Energy Future

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is a
privately held diversified energy holding company with a portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas.  Oncor,
an 80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the largest
regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.

The Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth.  EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating while
reducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS).  The Debtors are seeking to have their cases
jointly administered for procedural purposes.

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion.  The Debtors have $42
billion of funded indebtedness.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal.  The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor,
and Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring
agreement are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP,
as legal advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor.
The EFH equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor.  Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for
the second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is
represented by Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and
Gregory A. Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S.
Weisfelner, Esq., Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq.,
Jeremy B. Coffey, Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.

An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in
the case.  The Committee represents the interests of the unsecured
creditors of ONLY of Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company
LLC; EFCH's direct subsidiary, Texas Competitive Electric Holdings
Company LLC; and EFH Corporate Services Company, and of no other
debtors.  The Committee has selected Morrison & Foerster LLP and
Polsinelli PC for representation in this high-profile energy
restructuring.  The lawyers working on the case are James M. Peck,
Esq., Brett H. Miller, Esq., and Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at
Morrison & Foerster LLP; and Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Justin K.
Edelson, Esq., Shanti M. Katona, Esq., and Edward Fox, Esq., at
Polsinelli PC.


ERG INTERMEDIATE: Can Pay $700K Incentive Payment to CFO
--------------------------------------------------------
ERG Intermediate Holdings, LLC, and its affiliate debtors sought
and obtained from Judge Harlin D. Hale of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, authority to
make incentive payments to R. Kelley Plato, the sole manager of
each of the Debtors and their Chief Financial Officer.

The Debtors also sought and obtained authority from Judge Hale to
implement a severance program designed to pay employees terminated
during the pendency of the Chapter 11 cases.

Mr. Plato is managing the marketing efforts for the sale of the
Debtors' California-based assets as a going concern.  The Debtors'
counsel, Tom A. Howley, Esq., at Jones Day, in Houston, Texas,
tells the Court that the Debtors believe Mr. Plato is critical to
the sale process due to his in-depth knowledge of the Debtors'
businesses as well as his network of contacts in the oil and gas
industry, having more than 20 years of engineering and executive
experience in the industry.  Mr. Howley adds that because of Mr.
Plato's central role in the success of the 363 Sale, the Debtors
have determined that it is necessary and appropriate to incentivize
Mr. Plato's efforts in connection with the 363 Sale.  Mr. Howley
tells the Court that all incentive compensation payable to Mr.
Plato will be solely based upon a successful closing of the 363
Sales and the subsequent transition of operations to the purchaser
of the Debtors' assets.

Mr. Plato would earn a one-time payment of $350,000 upon the
successful closing of the 363 Sale.  A second, final $350,000
payment will be given to Mr. Plato once his transition services to
the purchaser are complete.  The Debtors' DIP lender has agreed to
authorize borrowings from the Debtors' postpetition credit facility
to fund the payments to Mr. Plato and is fully supportive of the
proposed payments.

Mr. Howley tells the Court that following the sale of their
California assets pursuant to the 363 Sale, the Debtors will need
to reduce staffing and address issues regarding increased turnover
or departure of employees, which threatens successful
reorganization in the Chapter 11 cases.  Mr. Howley further tells
the Court that to address these issues, the Debtors seek to
institute the Severance Program to provide severance payments to
the Debtors' employees upon the termination of employment, subject
to the Debtors' discretion and certain conditions.

Under the Severance Program, the Debtors will allocate up to
$500,000 for the purposes of paying severance, in the Debtors' sole
discretion, to employees terminated during the pendency of the
Chapter 11 cases.  Among the conditions required for payments under
the Severance Program would be that participating employees must
(a) maintain satisfactory performance with respect to their
employment, (b) refrain from voluntarily terminating employment
with the Debtors and (c) release any claims against the Debtors'
estates, except for claims related to accrued wages and benefits,
in exchange for accepting payments under the Severance Program.
Mr. Plato will not be eligible to receive payments under the
Severance Program, and no other employee that would receive
payments under the Severance Program is an "insider" of the
Debtors.

William T. Neary, the U.S. Trustee for Region 6, objected to the
Debtors' Motion, complaining that the incentive payments to Mr.
Plato, totaling $700,000, appear to be primarily retentive in
nature because they are not contingent upon meaningful performance
targets.  The U.S. Trustee pointed out that payments to Mr. Plato
are not contingent upon the economic substance of the asset sale or
a particular minimum asset sale price and that the amount of the
proposed payments -- $350,000, Mr. Plato's base yearly salary --
track Mr. Plato's incentive compensation and sale incentive bonuses
as set forth in his employment agreement, suggesting that the
Debtors are attempting to mimic by order of the Court, Mr. Plato's
bonuses as set forth in his employment agreement.

The U.S. Trustee further complained that it is impossible to
determine whether the Severance Program is fair and reasonable or
whether it discriminates unfairly among the employees to whom it
may apply, because the distribution of the severance payments under
the proposed plan are left to the sole discretion of the Debtors.
The U.S. Trustee told the Court that the Debtors make no showing
regarding whether the proposed Severance Program meets industry
standards, whether they conducted due diligence to formulate the
plan, or whether the Debtors received independent counsel in
formulating the plan.

In reply to the U.S Trustee's objection, Mr. Howley argued that the
proposed incentive payments are tied to specific performance goals
designed to incentivize Mr. Plato's performance of substantial,
critical additional duties that he has assumed since the start of
the Chapter 11 cases.

CLMG Corp., in response to the U.S. Trustee's objection, maintained
that both incentive payments and payments from the severance fund
to compensate rank and file employees are absolutely critical to
maintaining operations prior to a sale, and the payments will be
funded from the DIP facility and paid at the closing of the sale
from the proceeds of the DIP Agent's and Prepetition Agent's
collateral without any practical effect on the Debtors' estates.

CLMG's counsel, Craig H. Averch, Esq., at White & Case LLP, in Los
Angeles, California, told the Court that the DIP Agent has agreed
to allocations in the DIP Budget for the incentive and severance
programs described in the Debtors' Motion.  Mr. Averch said that to
the extent that these programs are not approved, the allocations
cannot be put to another use.  He argued that denying the relief
requested in the Debtors' Motion will not "preserve value of the
estate for the benefit of creditors," but it will deprive the
Debtors' estates of the salutary effects of having a properly
incentivized individual managing the sale process and having the
flexibility to award severance payments to rank and file employees
who are also essential to the Debtors' successful conduct of its
sale process and any potential reorganization.

The Debtors are represented by:

          Tom A. Howley, Esq.
          JONES DAY
          717 Texas Avenue, Suite 3300
          Houston, TX 77002
          Telephone: (832)239-3939
          Email: tahowley@jonesday.com

             -- and --

          Brad B. Erens, Esq.
          Joseph A. Florczak, Esq.
          JONES DAY
          77 West Wacker
          Chicago, Illinois 60601
          Telephone: (312)782-3939
          Email: bberens@jonesday.com
                 jflorczak@jonesday.com

The U.S. Trustee is represented by:

          Meredyth A. Kippes, Esq.
          OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE
          1100 Commerce St. Room 976
          Dallas, Texas 75242
          Telephone: (214)767-1079
          Email: meredyth.a.kippes@usdoj.gov

CLMG is represented by:

          Craig H. Averch, Esq.
          Roberto J. Kampfner, Esq.
          WHITE & CASE LLP
          633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1900
          Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007
          Telephone: (213)620-7729
          Facsimile: (213)452-2329
          Email: caverch@whitecase.com
                 rkampfner@whitecase.com

             -- and --

          Thomas E. Lauria, Esq.
          WHITE & CASE LLP
          Southeast Financial Center, Suite 4900
          200 South Biscayne Blvd.
          Miami, FL 33131
          Telephone: (305)371-2700
          Facsimile: (305)358-5744
          Email: tlauria@whitecase.com

                 About ERG Intermediate

ERG Resources, LLC, is a privately owned oil & gas producer that

was formed in 1996. Since 2010, ERG Resources and ERG Operating

Co. have been primarily engaged in the exploration and
production
 of crude oil and natural gas in the Cat Canyon Field
in Santa 
Barbara County, California. ERG Resources owns 19,027
gross lease 
acreage in the Cat Canyon Field. ERG Resources also
owns and 
operates oil & gas leases representing 683 gross acres
of leasehold located in Liberty County, Texas. The Company's
corporate headquarters is located in Houston, Texas. Scott Y. Wood,
through two of his affiliates, owns 100% of the membership units in
ERG Intermediate Holdings LLC, the parent company.



ERG Intermediate Holdings, ERG Resources and three affiliates

sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case
No.
15-31858) on April 30, 2015, in Dallas, Texas.



The Debtors tapped Jones Day as counsel; DLA Piper as
co-counsel;
 AP Services, LLC, to provide a CRO; and Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions,
 LLC.



ERG Intermediate estimated $100 million to $500 million in
assets
and debt.



The U.S. Trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 case of ERG Intermediate
Holdings LLC appointed five creditors of the company to serve
on
the official committee of unsecured creditors.



ERROL WALTERS: Wells Fargo Has Green Light to Pursue Foreclosure
----------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Stuart M. Bernstein denied the motion of
Errol Walters, a chapter 11 debtor, for a determination that his
secured loans were discharged when he issued certain promissory
notes to his three mortgagees.  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee,
for the certificate holders of Asset-Backed Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2005-WCW2 through its servicer, Select
Portfolio Servicing, Inc., one of the mortgagees, has separately
moved for relief from the automatic stay to foreclose its mortgage.
Wells Fargo's Motion is granted, the judge said.

A copy of the Court's June 25, 2015 Memorandum Decision is
available at http://is.gd/rYCeHLfrom Leagle.com.

Attorneys for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Select Portfolio
Servicing, Inc.:

     Karen Sheehan, Esq.
     FRENKEL, LAMBERT, WEISS, WEISMAN & GORDON, LLP
     53 Gibson Street
     Bay Shore, NY 11706
     Tel: (631) 969-7777

Walters filed his chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
14-10119 (SMB)) on January 14, 2014.  He is an accountant residing
at 891 Barbara Drive, Teaneck, New Jersey.


FEDERAL RESOURCES: Solicitation Period Extended to July 22
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Joel T. Marker of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Utah issued a bridge order extending to July 22, 2015, the
period by which Federal Resources Corporation and Camp Bird
Colorado, Inc., have exclusive right to solicit acceptances of
their liquidating plan.

The bridge order serves to protect the Debtors' rights pending the
Court's determination of their Motion to Extend Exclusivity.

The Debtors ask the Court to extend their exclusive solicitation
period through and including October 30, 2015, as they are still in
the process of accumulating information received from equity
holders as a result of the solicitation notices, and are preparing
a report to be filed with the Court.  The Debtors said that once
that report is filed, the Debtors anticipate seeking further
instruction with the Court regarding how to proceed with noticing
their Disclosure Statement and Plan.

The Debtors are represented by:

          David E. Leta, Esq.
          Andrew V. Hardenbrook, Esq.
          SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
          15 W South Temple, Suite 1200
          Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
          Telephone: (801)257-1900
          Facsimile: (801)257-1800
          Email: dleta@swlaw.com
                 ahardenbrook@swlaw.com
        
               About Federal Resources

Federal Resources Corporation, along with subsidiary Camp
Bird
Colorado, Inc., sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D.
Utah Case No. 14-33427 and 14-33428) in Salt Lake City
on Dec. 29,
2014. The Debtors are represented by David E. Leta,
Esq., at Snell
& Wilmer, in Salt Lake City.



Federal and Camp Bird each estimated $10 million to $50 million
in
asset and debt.



The Debtors sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection with plans
to
sell subsidiary Camp Bird's gold mine in Ouray, Colorado to
pay off creditors.



Federal Resources is a Nevada Corporation that was formed in
1960
as a result of a merger between Radorock Resources, Inc.,
and
Federal Uranium Corporation. Federal currently has only
two
assets: (1) 100% of the stock of Camp Bird, a Colorado
corporation
and (2) 100% interest in a Madawaska Mines Limited, a
Canadian
corporation doing business in Ontario Canada.



Camp Bird's principal assets consist of patented gold mining claims
and related land located in Ouray, Colorado. Camp Bird also is the
sole owner of Camp Bird Tunnel, Mining and Transportation Company
("CTMT"), which owns various water and tunnel rights used and
associated with the Camp Bird properties.



Madawaska Mines owns a 5l% interest in a joint venture, which holds

the Madawaska Mine near Bancroft, Ontario.



                       *     *     *

Camp Bird Colorado, Inc., and Federal Resources Corporation filed a
liquidating plan that contemplates an auction for the Camp Bird's
gold mine in Ouray, Colorado, to be conducted within 180 calendar
days after the effective date of the Plan.

All allowed secured creditors with valid liens against the Camp
Bird Mine will have the right to credit bid their allowed secured
claims at the auction for the Camp Bird Mine.

On the Effective Date, the Debtors will appoint a liquidating
trustee who will administer the remaining assets of the Debtors,
including all claims including all claims and causes of actions
against any parties.  The liquidating trustee will be entitled to
compensation at his/her normal hourly rate plus a fee of one half
of 0.5% of all funds distributed or paid to creditors, such percent
fee not to exceed a maximum amount of $150,000.


FOUR TIGERS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
----------------------------------------------
Debtor: Four Tigers Group, L.L.C.
           dba Ceasars Reception Hall
        5430 Riverside
        Laredo, TX 78045

Case No.: 15-50100

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas (Laredo)

Judge: Hon. David R Jones

Debtor's Counsel: Carl Michael Barto, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES OF CARL M. BARTO
                  817 Guadalupe St.
                  Laredo, TX 78040
                  Tel: 956-725-7500
                  Fax: 956-722-6739
                  Email: cmblaw@netscorp.net

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $500,000 to $1 million

The petition was signed by Jose Arturo Pantoja, managing member.

The Debtor did not include a list of its largest unsecured
creditors when it filed the petition.


GENERAL GROWTH: Appeal in Iwi Relocation Suit Dismissed as Moot
---------------------------------------------------------------
Paulette Ka'anohiokalani Kaleikini; GGP General Growth Properties,
Inc., GGP Limited Partnership, and Victoria Ward, Limited; and
Suzanne Case, in her official capacity as Chairperson of the Board
of Land and Natural Resources, the Board of Land and Natural
Resources, the Department of Land and Natural Resources, and the
O'ahu Island Burial Council, each filed a response to a March 27,
2015, Order to Show Cause.

The case arises out of Kaleikini's opposition to the OIBC's
decision to approve the relocation of previously identified Native
Hawaiian burials and the DLNR's decision to approve the relocation
of additional inadvertently discovered burials.  Kaleikini filed a
Second Amended Complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief,
which contested these decisions and sought to enjoin the GGP
Appellees and the State from disinterring the iwi and to require
that any iwi that had been removed be reinterred back in the same
location.  However, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Kaleikini
reached an agreement with the GGP Appellees and the State regarding
the treatment of the burial remains, with the parties agreeing that
both the previously identified and inadvertently discovered burial
remains would be reinterred at a Central Burial Preservation Site
or at other specific reburial sites.

Based on the Settlement Agreement, the controversy underlying the
case, and the appeal, is moot, the Intermediate Court of Appeals of
Hawai'i concluded.

The Intermediate Court therefore dismissed the appeal on the ground
of mootness.

The case is PAULETTE KA'ANOHIOKALANI KALEIKINI,
Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUZANNE CASE, in her official capacity as
Chairperson of the Board of Land & Natural Resources, BOARD OF LAND
& NATURAL RESOURCES, the DEPARTMENT OF LAND & NATURAL RESOURCE
O'AHU ISLAND BURIALS COUNCIL, GGP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, VICTORIA
WARD, LIMITED and GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees, Case No. 29675, (Haw. App.).

A full-text copy of the Intermediate Court's Order dated June 10,
2015, is available at http://is.gd/qpPWm3from Leagle.com.

                       About General Growth

Based in Chicago, Illinois, General Growth Properties, Inc. --
http://www.ggp.com/-- is the second-largest U.S. mall owner.  
General Growth is a self-administered and self-managed real estate
investment trust.

General Growth Properties Inc. and its affiliates filed for
Chapter 11 protection on April 16, 2009 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y., Case No.
09-11977).  Marcia L. Goldstein, Esq., Gary T. Holtzer, Esq.,
Adam P. Strochak, Esq., and Stephen A. Youngman, Esq., at Weil,
Gotshal & Manges LLP, serve as bankruptcy counsel.  Kirkland &
Ellis LLP is co-counsel.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC has been
engaged as claims agent.  The Company also hired AlixPartners LLP
as financial advisor and Miller Buckfire Co. LLC, as investment
bankers.  The Debtors disclosed $29,557,330,000 in assets and
$27,293,734,000 in debts as of Dec. 31, 2008.

General Growth Properties on Nov. 9, 2010, successfully completed
the final steps of its financial restructuring and emerged from
Chapter 11.  GGP restructured roughly $15 billion of project-level
debt Recapitalized with $6.8 billion in new equity capital Paid
all creditor claims in full achieved substantial recovery for
equity holders.

As part of its plan of reorganization, GGP split itself into two
separate and independent publicly traded corporations, and
shareholders as of the record date of Nov. 1, 2010, received
common stock in both companies.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on May 15, 2013,
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said it withdrew its
unsolicited ratings on General Growth Properties Inc.'s (GGP) and
GGP's affiliate, The Rouse Company L.P. (Rouse), including the
'BB' corporate credit ratings, the 'B' rating on GGP's
$250 million 6.375% series A cumulative perpetual preferred stock,
and the ratings on issues that have been redeemed.



GIULIANO PROPERTIES: Case Summary & 6 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Giuliano Properties Inc.
        248-50 Market Street
        Philadelphia, PA 19106

Case No.: 15-14837

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)

Judge: Hon. Eric L. Frank

Debtor's Counsel: Michael Alan Siddons, Esq.
                  LAW FIRM OF MICHAEL ALAN SIDDONS ESQ
                  230 N. Monroe Street
                  PO Box 403
                  Media, PA 19063
                  Tel: 484-614-6546
                  Email: msiddons@siddonslaw.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Giampaolo Duva, president.

A list of the Debtor's six largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb15-14837.pdf


GOBER & MERRELL: Case Summary & 4 Top Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Gober & Merrell Chevrolet-Buick-GMC, Inc.
        1506 San Jacinto
        Sulphur Springs, TX 75482

Case No.: 15-41219

Nature of Business: Single Asset Real Estate

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Texas (Sherman)

Debtor's Counsel: Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
                  ERIC A. LIEPINS P.C.
                  12770 Coit Road, Suite 1100
                  Dallas, TX 75251
                  Tel: (972) 991-5591
                  Email: eric@ealpc.com

Total Assets: $1.2 million

Total Liabilities: $785,000

The petition was signed by Suenan Gober, president.

A list of the Debtor's four largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/txeb15-41219.pdf


GOLDEN COUNTY: Court Okays Sale of Assets to Monogram Appetizers
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Kevin Gross of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware entered on July 2, 2015, an order approving the sale of
substantially all of the assets of Golden County Foods, Inc., to
Monogram Appetizers, LLC, free and clear of all liens, claims,
encumbrances and interests, approving the stalking horse agreement,
and approving the assumption and assignment of certain executory
contracts and unexpired leases related thereto.

A copy of the court order and amended Asset Purchase Agreement
entered into between the Debtor and the Buyer on July 2, 2015, is
available for free at http://is.gd/yAmr9p

Pursuant to the amended APA, the aggregate consideration for the
purchased asset will be: (a) $37.20 million in case; (b) the
assumption of liabilities; and (c) the prorated expenses, if
applicable.  The consummation of the purchase and sale will take
place by 10:00 a.m. (local time) on July 14, 2015; provided however
that the Buyer may elect to postpone the closing to July 16, 2015,
and the Buyer and the Seller may mutually agree upon an alternative
date for closing.  If the Buyer fails to consummate the
contemplated transactions, the break-up fee is $500,000.

The Court also approved the Debtors' designation of Golden Foods
International, Inc. -- which presented a $37.26 million offer for
the assets -- as the alternate bidder.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on June 5, 2015,
Golden County and its affiliated debtors asked authority from the
Court to sell substantially all of their assets to the Buyer for
$22.0 million.  Under the proposed bidding procedures:(i) the bid
deadline was June 29, 2015; (ii) the auction was scheduled for July
1, 2015; (iii) the sale hearing was scheduled to take place on or
after July 1, 2015; (iv) the Break-Up Fee was fixed at $500,000;
and (v) an expense reimbursement of documented expenses of up to
$150,000 to the stalking horse bidder had the stalking horse bidder
not been chosen as the successful bidder.

The Debtor and the Buyer first entered into that certain asset
purchase agreement on May 22, 2015.  According to a notice of
selection of successful bidder at the auction, the Buyer, as the
stalking horse bidder, offered $22 million, plus certain assumed
liabilities.  On June 29, 2015, the Debtors received a competing
bid from Golden Foods International under the terms of an asset
purchase agreement, which provided for the sale of the assets to
Golden Foods International for $24 million minus certain deductions
for unpaid property taxes.  At the conclusion of the auction, the
Debtors designated the Buyer as the successful bidder under the
terms of the bid procedures order with a successful bid in the
amount of $37.20 million.

The bid procedures motion met objections from Andrew R. Vara, the
Acting United States Trustee for Region 3; Columbia Manufacturing
Inc. dba Columbia Onion -- which sold and shipped pre-petition,
between April 10, 2015, and May 14, 2015, fresh onions to Golden
County for agreed upon prices cumulatively totaling the principal
amount of $229,832.64, which has not been paid; and the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors.

The Trustee said in an objection -- a copy of which is available
for free at http://is.gd/3kxH3E-- filed on June 10, 2015, that the
motion sought approval of a rushed sale of the assets to the Buyer.
The Trustee objected to the Break-up Fee and expense
reimbursement.  The Trustee said, "Although Monogram purports to
have committed to the auction process, this commitment is illusory,
as Monogram has refused to even be the backup bidder if an auction
occurs and another bidder wins and then cannot consummate the sale.
Further, Monogram's bid contains contingencies that only Monogram
can satisfy, and it is inappropriate to award Monogram a Break-up
Fee or expense reimbursement in the event a sale closes to another
bidder but Monogram has not demonstrated that its own contingencies
have been satisfied."

Columbia Manufacturing also objected to the bid procedures motion
on June 10, saying that the procedures improperly attempted to
establish a mechanism by which sale proceeds are earmarked for
distribution to the Debtors' secured lender in violation of
Columbia Manufacturing's rights.  A copy of the objection is
available for free at http://is.gd/gBbCmB

The Committee said in an objection dated June 11, 2015, that it
objects to the bid procedures motion and any sale, credit bid or
otherwise, that does not preserve the Committee's lien challenge
rights or ability to prosecute the Committee litigation claims.
The Committee said that it has several issues with the procedures
governing the process and the asset purchase agreement that the
Debtors entered into with the Buyer.  The Committee wanted that
these issues must be resolved before either the bid procedures or
sale would be approved.  The Committee found the Buyer's stalking
horse bid insufficient.  A copy of the Committee's objection is
available for free at http://is.gd/OylonY

On June 11, 2015, the Debtors filed a notice identifying (1) those
executory contracts and unexpired leases that may be assumed and
assigned to a potential purchaser in connection with the sale of
the assets; and (ii) the proposed cure amount associated with each
executory contract and unexpired lease.  A list of the executory
contracts and unexpired leases, together with the cure amount for
each, is available for free at http://is.gd/wf7Lcy

Brazos Equity Fund II, L.P., filed on June 12, 2015, a response to
the Committee's objection, saying that the issues the Court must
resolve to approve the bid procedures and the final DIP financing
on June 15, 2015, are "quite narrow."  The prepetition credit
agreement was fully guaranteed by debtor GCF Holdings II, Inc.,
non-debtor affiliate Golden County Foods Holdings, Inc., and Brazos
Equity -- whose guaranty was limited to a maximum $12.50 million
pursuant to that certain limited guaranty dated as ofNov. 13, 2013,
between Brazos Equity and PNC.

According to Brazos Equity, the small handful of unsettled points
are the last issues that stand between the Debtors and an auction
that has the potential to resolve may of the other issues the
Committee seeks to have the Court resolve prematurely by its
objections.  The Committee, Brazos Equity stated, would have the
Court consider bare allegations of recharacterization without the
benefit of any supporting evidence; the forced disgorgement of one
non-debtors' rights with respect to another non-debtor for the
purpose of earning the Committee undeserved leverage; and solving
for a problem that may be illusory by subverting the priority
scheme under the Bankruptcy Code.  Brazos Equity said that the
Court need not consider any of these requests at this time and yet
keep these Debtors on a path toward the timely sale of their assets
and distributions to their creditors.  A copy of Brazos Equity's
response is available for free at http://is.gd/HVWhiV

On June 15, 2015, the Court approved at a hearing the bidding
procedures motion, subject to certain revisions being made to the
proposed form of order.  A copy of the revised form of order is
available for free at http://is.gd/wpD1Uo. On June 17, 2015, the
Court approved the Debtors' bidding procedures.

On June 30, 2015, the Committee requested in a limited objection --
a copy of which is available for free at http://is.gd/PSQf19--
filed with the Court that any sale order, among other things, (a)
condition the Buyer's or another buyer's purchase of non-insider
avoidance actions on the release of those actions, (b) prohibit any
buyer from purchasing causes of action against insiders of the
Debtors, (c) preserve creditors' rights of setoff, recoupment, and
other similar claims against the Buyer post-closing, (d) strike or
narrow the asset purchase agreement's release provisions, (e)
strike or narrow the asset purchase agreement's overly broad seller
material adverse effect clause, and (f) provide the Committee
consultation rights with respect to amendments to the asset
purchase agreement.

Columbia Manufacturing is available for free at:

      Sullivan Hazeltine Allinson LLC
      Elihu E. Allinson III, Esq.
      901 North Market Street, Suite 1300
      Wilmington, DE 19801
      Tel: (302) 428-8191
      Fax: (302) 428-8195
      E-mail: zallinson@sha-llc.com

               and

      Rynn & Janowsky, LLP
      R. Jason Read, Esq.
      June Monroe, Esq.
      4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 700
      Newport Beach, CA 92660
      Tel: (949) 752-2911
      Fax: (949) 752-0953
      E-mail: jason@rjlaw.com
              june@rjlaw.com

The Committee is represented by:

      Lowenstein Sandler LLP
      Kenneth A. Rosen, Esq.
      Sharon L. Levine, Esq.
      Jeffrey D. Prol, Esq.
      65 Livingston Avenue
      Roseland, NJ 07068
      Tel: (973) 597-2500
      Fax: (973) 597-2400
      E-mail: krosen@lowenstein.com
              slevine@lowenstein.com
              jprol@lowenstein.com

The Committee's Delaware counsel can be reached at:

      Gellert Scali Busenkell & Brown, LCC
      Michael Busenkell, Esq.
      Emily K. Devan, Esq.
      913 N. Market Street, 10th Floor
      Wilmington, DE 19801
      Tel: (302) 425-5812
      Fax: (302) 425-5814
      E-mail: mbusenkell@gsbblaw.com

Brazos Equity is represented by:

      Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLC
      L. Katherine Good, Esq.
      The Renaissance Centre, Suite 500
      405 North King Street
      Wilmington, Delaware 19801
      Tel: (302) 353-4144
      Fax: (302) 661-7950
      E-mail: kgood@wtplaw.com

               and

      Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
      Stephen A. Youngman, Esq.
      Charles M. Persons, Jr., Esq.
      200 Crescent Court, Suite 300
      Dallas, Texas 75201
      Tel: (214) 746-7700
      Fax: (214) 746-7777
      E-mail: stephen.youngman@weil.com
              charles.persons@weil.com

                     About Golden County

Golden County and its affiliates GCF Franchisee, Inc., and GCF
Holdings II, Inc. filed separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions
(Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 15-11062 to 15-11064) on May 15, 2015.

Mark D. Collins, Esq., and Tyler D. Semmelman, Esq., at Richards,
Layton & Finger, P.A., represent the Debtor in their restructuring
effort.  The Debtors also hired Neligan Foley LLP as local
counsel.

The Debtors estimated assets and debts at $10 million to $50
million.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed seven creditors to serve on
the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.


GOLDEN COUNTY: Drops Bid to Settle Claims of OSHA
-------------------------------------------------
Golden County Foods Inc. has withdrawn its motion asking for court
approval to resolve the claims asserted by a government agency in
two citations it issued to the company for alleged occupational
hazards at its facilities.

The company entered into a settlement agreement with Occupational
Safety and Health Administration earlier this year after it was
issued two citations on April 30.

Under the settlement, OSHA agreed to reduce the total penalty to
$2,890 from $7,200.  In exchange, Golden County agreed to pay the
penalty and waive its right to contest the citations.

                     About Golden County

Golden County and its affiliates GCF Franchisee, Inc., and GCF
Holdings II, Inc. filed separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions
(Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 15-11062 to 15-11064) on May 15, 2015.

Mark D. Collins, Esq., and Tyler D. Semmelman, Esq., at Richards,
Layton & Finger, P.A., represent the Debtor in their restructuring
effort.  The Debtors also hired Neligan Foley LLP as local
counsel.

The Debtors estimated assets and debts at $10 million to $50
million.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed seven creditors to serve on
the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.


GOLDEN COUNTY: Gets Additional $400K Loan from PNC Bank
-------------------------------------------------------
Golden County Foods Inc., a manufacturer of frozen food products,
will receive an additional $400,000 loan from PNC Bank National
Association, according to court filings.

The company will use the loan to pay workers' union UFCW Local
1473.  The union earlier agreed to Golden County's decision to
reject their collective bargaining agreement in exchange for the
payment.

Golden County settled its dispute with the workers' union after
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross gave final approval to the $12.75
million loan that PNC Bank committed to provide to get the company
through bankruptcy.

To obtain the $400,000 loan, the company had to file a motion,
which the bankruptcy judge granted last week, court filings show.

Golden County previously received objections from its suppliers
Eagle Eye Manufacturing Inc., Columbia Manufacturing Inc. and Mr.
Dell Foods Inc., which are beneficiaries of a trust created under
the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA).

The suppliers said they oppose any move by the company to secure
the loan with a priming lien on trust assets.

                     $12.75 Million DIP Loan

Golden County earlier received court approvals to get $12.75
million financing from PNC Bank, which is owed more than $21.5
million.

The company first received interim approval on May 20.  On June 22,
Judge Gross gave final approval to the $12.75 million loan, and
allowed Golden County to use the pre-bankruptcy lender's cash
collateral.

As protection, the bankruptcy judge granted PNC Bank a lien on some
of the properties owned by the company and a "superpriority"
administrative expense claim, court filings show.

Golden County's official committee of unsecured creditors had
opposed the financing, saying it would leave the company's estate
administratively insolvent.  

The group also objected to the granting of any superpriority claims
or "post-petition liens" on previously unencumbered assets.  The
objection had already been resolved, court filings show.

The $12.75 million financing also drew flak from its suppliers,
including Bongards' Creameries, a beneficiary of the trust imposed
by the Minnesota Wholesale Produce Dealers Act.

Bongards' Creameries criticized the company's proposal to sell
trust assets without providing "adequate protection" to trust
beneficiaries.

                     About Golden County

Golden County and its affiliates GCF Franchisee, Inc., and GCF
Holdings II, Inc. filed separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions
(Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 15-11062 to 15-11064) on May 15, 2015.

Mark D. Collins, Esq., and Tyler D. Semmelman, Esq., at Richards,
Layton & Finger, P.A., represent the Debtor in their restructuring
effort.  The Debtors also hired Neligan Foley LLP as local
counsel.

The Debtors estimated assets and debts at $10 million to $50
million.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed seven creditors to serve on
the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.


GT ADVANCED: Court OKs GTAT's Exclusivity Agreement With Waaree
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Henry J. Boroff of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Hampshire entered an order authorizing GTAT
Corporation to enter into an agreement with Waaree Energies
Limited.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on June 24, 2015, GT
Advanced Technologies Inc. and its affiliated debtors sought
authority from the Court to to enter into a conditional exclusivity
agreement with Waaree Energies.  Pursuant to the Agreement, Waaree
Energies  will purchase certain tools from GT Corp and purchase
Merlin(TM) grids in order to produce certain modules that it
intends to sell within India.

GTAT is authorized to enter into the conditional exclusivity
agreement, a copy of which is available for free at:

                       http://is.gd/XZWclN

                         About GT Advanced

Headquartered in Merrimack, New Hampshire, GT Advanced Technologies
Inc. -- http://www.gtat.com/-- produces materials and equipment
for the electronics industry.  On Nov. 4, 2013, GTAT announced a
multiyear supply deal with Apple Inc. to produce sapphire glass
material for use in consumer electronics products.

Under the deal, Apple would provide GTAT with a prepayment of
approximately $578 million paid in four installments and, starting
in 2015, GTAT would reimburse Apple for the prepayment over a
five-year period.

GT is a publicly held corporation whose stock was traded on NASDAQ
under the ticker symbol "GTAT."  GTAT was de-listed from the NASDAQ
stock exchange in October 2014.

As of June 28, 2014, the GTAT Group's unaudited and consolidated
financial statements reflected assets totaling $1.5 billion and
liabilities totaling $1.3 billion.  As of Sept. 29, 2014, GTAT had
$85 million in cash, $84 million of which is unencumbered.

On Oct. 6, 2014, GT Advanced Technologies and eight affiliates
filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.H. Lead Case No. 14-11916).  GT says
that it has sought bankruptcy protection due to a severe liquidity
crisis brought about by its issues with Apple.

The Debtors have tapped Nixon Peabody LLP and Paul Hastings LLP as
attorneys and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims and
noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee has named seven members to the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.  The Committee' professionals are Kelley
Drye as its bankruptcy counsel; Devine, Millimet & Branch,
Professional Association as local counsel; EisnerAmper LLP as
financial advisors; and Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. as investment
banker.

GTAT has reached a settlement with Apple.  The settlement gives
Apple an approved claim for $439 million secured by more than 2,000
sapphire furnaces that GT Advanced owns and has four years to sell,
with proceeds going to Apple.  In addition, Apple gets
royalty-free, non-exclusive licenses for GTAT's technology.

The bankruptcy case is assigned to Judge Henry J. Boroff.


GT ADVANCED: Sale of Sapphire Assets to Thermal Technology Okayed
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Henry J. Boroff of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Hampshire entered on June 23, 2015, an order
approving the sale of certain assets of GT Sapphire Systems Group
LLC to Thermal Technology, LLC, free and clear of all liens,
claims, encumbrances, and interests, for $1.85 million.

The consummation of the transactions will take place at 12:00 noon
(Boston time) on the fifth business day, or at another date or
place as mutually agreed by the Buyer and the Seller.

The Buyer will make a cash deposit of $185,000 by wire transfer to
Neal Gerber & Eisenberg LLP, to be held in escrow by Neal Gerber.

A copy of the court order and asset purchase agreement is available
for free at http://is.gd/9Vbfu3

On June 22, 2015, GT Advanced Technologies Inc. and its affiliated
debtors submitted to the Court a supplement to their motion for
approval of the sale, saying that the Buyer has agreed to enter
into an amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement.  Among other
things, the amendment clarifies the Seller's and the Buyer's
obligations regarding post-closing collection of the purchased
assets and excluded assets, respectively.  

The amendment clarifies that the Seller's obligation to surrender
possession of the premises is conditions upon the occurrence of the
closing of the sale, instead of entry of the sale order.  The
amendment also replaces Neal Gerber with Nixon Peabody LLP as the
escrow agent for the deposit.  To formalize the escrow arrangement,
Buyer and Nixon Peabody have also agreed to enter into the escrow
agreement, a copy of which, together with the supplement to the
motion, is available for free at:

                        http://is.gd/Z8Y3Vk

                         About GT Advanced

Headquartered in Merrimack, New Hampshire, GT Advanced Technologies
Inc. -- http://www.gtat.com/-- produces materials and equipment
for the electronics industry.  On Nov. 4, 2013, GTAT announced a
multiyear supply deal with Apple Inc. to produce sapphire glass
material for use in consumer electronics products.

Under the deal, Apple would provide GTAT with a prepayment of
approximately $578 million paid in four installments and, starting
in 2015, GTAT would reimburse Apple for the prepayment over a
five-year period.

GT is a publicly held corporation whose stock was traded on NASDAQ
under the ticker symbol "GTAT."  GTAT was de-listed from the NASDAQ
stock exchange in October 2014.

As of June 28, 2014, the GTAT Group's unaudited and consolidated
financial statements reflected assets totaling $1.5 billion and
liabilities totaling $1.3 billion.  As of Sept. 29, 2014, GTAT had
$85 million in cash, $84 million of which is unencumbered.

On Oct. 6, 2014, GT Advanced Technologies and eight affiliates
filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.H. Lead Case No. 14-11916).  GT says
that it has sought bankruptcy protection due to a severe liquidity
crisis brought about by its issues with Apple.

The Debtors have tapped Nixon Peabody LLP and Paul Hastings LLP as
attorneys and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims and
noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee has named seven members to the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.  The Committee' professionals are Kelley
Drye as its bankruptcy counsel; Devine, Millimet & Branch,
Professional Association as local counsel; EisnerAmper LLP as
financial advisors; and Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. as investment
banker.

GTAT has reached a settlement with Apple.  The settlement gives
Apple an approved claim for $439 million secured by more than 2,000
sapphire furnaces that GT Advanced owns and has four years to sell,
with proceeds going to Apple.  In addition, Apple gets
royalty-free, non-exclusive licenses for GTAT's technology.

The bankruptcy case is assigned to Judge Henry J. Boroff.


GT ADVANCED: Seeks Approval of $95-Mil. Bankruptcy Loan
-------------------------------------------------------
Jacqueline Palank, writing for Dow Jones' Daily Bankruptcy Review,
reported that former Apple Inc. supplier GT Advanced Technologies
Inc. is seeking bankruptcy-court approval to borrow $95 million
from a group of its bondholders.

According to the report, the loan, outlined in court papers filed
July 6, is the culmination of months of negotiations that saw a key
creditor offer a rival financing package to fund GT Advanced's
chapter 11 restructuring.

                     About GT Advanced

Headquartered in Merrimack, New Hampshire, GT Advanced
Technologies Inc. -- http://www.gtat.com/-- produces materials   
and equipment for the electronics industry. On Nov. 4, 2013, GTAT
announced a multiyear supply deal with Apple Inc. to produce
sapphire glass material for use in consumer electronics
products.

Under the deal, Apple would provide GTAT with a prepayment of
approximately $578 million paid in four installments and,
starting in 2015, GTAT would reimburse Apple for the prepayment
over a five-year period.

GT is a publicly held corporation whose stock was traded on NASDAQ
under the ticker symbol "GTAT." GTAT was de-listed from the
NASDAQ stock exchange in October 2014.

As of June 28, 2014, the GTAT Group's unaudited and consolidated
financial statements reflected assets totaling $1.5 billion and
liabilities totaling $1.3 billion.  As of Sept. 29, 2014, GTAT
had $85 million in cash, $84 million of which is unencumbered.

On Oct. 6, 2014, GT Advanced Technologies and eight affiliates
filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the
United
States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.H. Lead Case No. 14-11916).  GT
sought bankruptcy protection due to a severe liquidity crisis
brought about by its issues with Apple.

The Debtors have tapped Nixon Peabody LLP and Paul Hastings LLP
as attorneys and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims
and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee has named seven members to the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors. The Committee' professionals
are Kelley Drye as its bankruptcy counsel; Devine, Millimet &
Branch, Professional Association as local counsel; Eisner Amper
LLP as financial advisors; and Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. as
investment banker.

GTAT has reached a settlement with Apple. The settlement gives
Apple an approved claim for $439 million secured by more than
2,000
sapphire furnaces that GT Advanced owns and has four years to
sell,
with proceeds going to Apple.  In addition, Apple
gets royalty-free, non-exclusive licenses for GTAT's technology.


HEPAR BIOSCIENCE: Cadwell Sanford Approved as Committee Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Dakota
authorized the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in Hepar
Bioscience, LLC's case to retain James S. Simko and Cadwell,
Sanford, Deibert & Garry, LLP, as its counsel.

Cadwell Sanford will charge at these hourly rates for the
representation of the Committee:

         Mr. Simko                           $225
         Scott Perrenoud                     $250
         Associates                          $150
         Paralegals                           $90

To the best of the Committee's knowledge, Cadwell Sanford does not
hold or represent any interest adverse to the Debtor's estate or to
the Committee.

Cadwell Sanford can be reached at:

         James S. Simko, Esq.
         CADWEL SANFORD DEIBERT & GARRY LLP
         200 East 10th Street, Suite 200
         P.O. Box 2498
         Sioux Falls, SD 57101
         Tel: (605) 336-0828
         E-mail: jsimko@cadwell.com

                      About Hepar BioScience

Jefferson, South Dakota-based Hepar BioScience LLC in the business
of receiving porcine (pork) by-products (concentrated peptone, a
functional pork protein and animal fat) and other meat by-products
that are primarily used in the porcine animal nutrition feed
industry (concentrated porcine peptone) and biodiesel or animal
feed business (animal fat).

The Company filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D. S.D.
Case No. 15-40057) on Feb. 20, 2015.  

Bankruptcy Judge Charles L. Nail, Jr., presides over the case.
Clair R. Gerry, Esq., at Gerry & Kulm Ask, Prof. LLC, represents
the Debtor in its restructuring effort.  The Debtor disclosed
$11,987,018 in assets and $22,243,151 in liabilities as of the
chapter 11 filing.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 12 appointed a five-member Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  The Committee tapped James S.
Simko of Cadwell, Sanford, Deibert & Garry, LLP as its counsel, and
Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC as its valuation advisor.



KITTUSAMY LLP: Creditors File Involuntary Petition
--------------------------------------------------
Kittusamy, LLP, doing business as Las Vegas Medical Centers, is
subject to an involuntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition filed by
creditors owed $6.93 million on business loans and an equipment
lease.

The creditors who signed the petition are:

                                                       Claim
      Creditor                     Nature of Claim     Amount
      --------                     ---------------     ------
     Moonshell, LLC                Business Loans   $2,952,870
     Xspectra, Inc.                Business Loan      $209,000
     Seven Hills Equipment, LLC    Equipment Lease  $2,740,660
     Venus Group, LLC              Medical Liens    $1,024,682
                                                    ----------
                                                    $6,927,211

Moonshell and Venus are represented by Samuel A. Schwartz, Esq., at
Schwartz Flansburg PLLC.   Xspectra and Seven Hills are represented
by Matthew C. Zirzow, Esq., at Larson & Zirzon, LLC.



KUM GANG: Former Workers Awarded $715K in Atty's Fees
-----------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger of the United States District
Court for South District of New York granted Tae H. Kim, et al.'s
motion and awarded them $715,116 in fees and $51,137 in
disbursements.

The Plaintiffs list eight lawyers from three organizations who
worked on their behalf and for whose work they seek a fee award.
On March 19, 2015, the District Court issued a decision granting
judgment to 11 plaintiffs following a bench trial on their claims
under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 201 et seq.,
the New York Labor Law Section 190 et seq., and related New York
Labor Department regulations.  In the wake of that decision, the
plaintiffs have filed an application seeking an award of attorney's
fees and out-of-pocket expenses.  The Defendants have not responded
to this motion, although they communicated an untimely request --
which the Court rejected -- that the court delay adjudication of
the motion pending determination of the defendants' appeal from the
judgment.

Magistrate Dolinger ruled that the Plaintiffs have documented, and
seek reimbursement for a very substantial block of hours.  On the
assumption that they do not propose to reduce the documented number
of hours of Ms. Huizar and the four Shearman & Sterling lawyers,
Magistrate Dolinger calculated that they are requesting payment for
more than 2,791 attorney hours.

The case is TAE H. KIM et al., Plaintiffs, v. KUM GANG, INC. et
al., Defendants, Case No., 12 CIV. 6344 (MHD), (S.D.N.Y.).

A full-text copy of Judge Dolinger's Memorandum and Order dated
June 5, 2015, is available at http://is.gd/HgfIqQfrom Leagle.com.

Flushing, New York-based Kum Gang, Inc., sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on April 30, 2015 (Bankr.
E.D.N.Y., Case No. 15-42020).  The case is assigned to Judge Carla
E. Craig.

The Debtor's counsel is Kenneth F. McCallion, Esq., at McCallion &
Associates LLP, in New York.


LEHMAN BROTHERS: Jan. 2016 Settlement Hearing Set for WMI Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP on July 6 issued a
statement regarding the Washington Mutual, Inc. Securities
Litigation.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

IN RE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document
Relates to: ALL ACTIONS

No. 2:08-md-1919 MJP

Lead Case No. C08-387 MJP

SUMMARY NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS CLAIM FILED IN THE
SIPA LIQUIDATION OF LEHMAN BROTHERS INC.

TO: All persons or entities who purchased or acquired any of the
WMI Class Securities during the period from October 19, 2005 to
July 23, 2008, were damaged thereby and who are members of the
Class certified in the above captioned Action.1

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure and an Order of the United States District
Court for the Western District of Washington, that Plaintiff
Brockton Contributory Retirement System ("Brockton"), a certified
representative of the Class in the above-captioned action (the
"Action") has reached a proposed settlement with the trustee for
the liquidation of Lehman Brothers Inc. ("Lehman") under the
Securities Investors Protection Act of 1970 ("SIPA") that provides
for the resolution of the Class Claim in Lehman's SIPA liquidation
proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court (the
"Settlement").  

If the Settlement is approved by the Court, it will result in the
allowance of a general, unsecured creditor claim against Lehman's
estate in the SIPA Proceeding in the amount of $16,500,000 for the
benefit of the Class (the "Allowed Class Claim").  The proposed
settlement is in addition to the three settlements totaling $208.5
million that Plaintiffs previously achieved in this Action.2

The amount that will ultimately be recovered from Lehman's estate
with respect to the Allowed Class Claim is currently unknown but it
is estimated that it will potentially be 50% of the value of the
Allowed Class Claim, or approximately $8,250,000.  This estimate is
based on the amount of the distributions made to date in the SIPA
Proceeding and the estimated potential amount of all future
distributions.  Future distributions will depend on several
factors, including how other disputed unliquidated contingent
claims are resolved as well as litigation in which the SIPA Trustee
is currently involved.  The SIPA Trustee has agreed to reserve
funds with respect to the Class Claim to bring it in parity with
payments already made on other allowed claims and such amount will
become payable to the Class upon the occurrence of the Effective
Date of the Settlement.  As of this date, a total of 27% of the
allowed amount of the Class Claim, or approximately $4,455,000, has
been reserved by the SIPA Trustee as a catch-up payment.  The
balance of the estimated potential $8,250,000 recovery will be paid
as future distributions are made.

If the Settlement is approved by the Court, the amount recovered,
less Court-approved fees and expenses, will be allocated among
eligible Authorized Claimants.  Please note: only those Authorized
Claimants (i) who purchased Floating Rate Notes, 7.250% Notes
and/or Series R Stock (the "Relevant Securities") during the Class
Period; (ii) whose claim calculated to a Securities Act Loss under
the Court-approved Plan of Allocation; (iii) who received a
distribution with respect to that loss; and (iv) who cashed their
distribution checks will be eligible to share in the funds obtained
through the Settlement.3

You do not need to submit a claim form or take any other action to
be eligible to receive funds obtained through the proposed
Settlement.  If the Settlement is approved, funds received in
connection with the Allowed Class Claim will be distributed to
eligible Authorized Claimants together with future distributions of
the net settlement funds from the previously achieved settlements.


Lehman served as an underwriter of WMI's offerings of the Relevant
Securities.  In the Complaint filed in this Action, Plaintiffs
asserted claims against Lehman for violations of the Securities Act
of 1933 in connection with these offerings.  However, the Action
could not be prosecuted against Lehman because, after the
commencement of Lehman's SIPA Proceeding in September 2008, an
automatic stay was triggered under the Bankruptcy Code.

Plaintiffs timely filed a general creditor claim on behalf of the
Class in Lehman's SIPA Proceeding based on Lehman's alleged
violations of federal securities laws as asserted in this Action.
After extensive arm's-length negotiations, Lead Counsel and
Plaintiff Brockton and the SIPA Trustee have agreed that the Class
Claim in the SIPA Proceeding shall have an allowed value of
$16,500,000.  The Allowed Class Claim will receive proportionally
the same payments or distributions as are generally received by
holders of other allowed general, unsecured claims against the
Lehman estate in the SIPA Proceeding.

In exchange for the Allowed Class Claim, Brockton, on behalf of
itself, its successors and assigns, and on behalf of any other
party, person, or entity claiming by, through or under it (the
"Claimant Releasing Parties"), will forever waive and release (i)
the Class Claim and the individual claim filed by Brockton in the
SIPA Proceeding (the "Claims") and (ii) any and all claims,
liabilities, causes of action, demands, and damages (of whatever
kind or nature and whether known or unknown or asserted or
unasserted) that the Claimant Releasing Parties may prior to the
Effective Date4 have ever had, may at the Effective Date have, or
at any time after the Effective Date can, could, shall, or may have
against Lehman, its estate, the SIPA Trustee, and the SIPA
Trustee's agents or attorneys, related to or arising out of any of
the matters, transactions, and accounts that are the subject of the
Claims.  If any Class Members have timely filed their own
individual proofs of claim in Lehman's SIPA Proceeding, the
proposed Settlement will not bar, release or otherwise affect such
claims.

Brockton and Lead Counsel believe, in light of the substantial size
of the recovery, the hurdles to recovering on a disputed claim in
the SIPA Proceeding, the costs of achieving a recovery on such a
claim through litigation and the uncertainty of the amount, if any,
that could be recovered even if they prevailed, that the proposed
Settlement is in the best interests of the Class.   

A Settlement Hearing will be held on January 15, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.
before the Honorable Marsha J. Pechman in the United States
District Court for the Western District of Washington, United
States Courthouse, 700 Stewart Street, Courtroom 14206, Seattle, WA
98101.  At the Settlement Hearing, the Court will consider whether
the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and
should be approved; and whether a motion by Lead Counsel for an
award of attorneys' fees in an amount not to exceed 7.5% of the
proceeds of the Settlement and reimbursement of litigation expenses
in an amount not to exceed $225,000 should be approved.

Please review the full Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Claim
Filed in the SIPA Liquidation of Lehman Brothers Inc. (the
"Notice"), which provides more details about the proposed
Settlement and the definitions of capitalized terms used in this
Summary Notice.  The Notice is available for downloading at
www.WashingtonMutualSecuritiesLitigationSettlement.com and from
Lead Counsel's website, www.blbglaw.com

Copies of the Notice can also be requested by writing to In re
Washington Mutual, Inc. Securities Litigation, c/o Garden City
Group, LLC, P.O. Box 91310, Seattle, WA 98111-9410, by toll-free
telephone at (888) 588-3788, or by emailing a request to
info@WashingtonMutualSecuritiesLitigationSettlement.com at any time
prior to the Settlement Hearing.  

Any objections to the proposed Settlement and/or Lead Counsel's
motion for attorneys' fees and expenses, must be filed with the
Court and delivered to Lead Counsel and counsel for the SIPA
Trustee such that they are received no later than December 26,
2015, in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice.

PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR THE CLERK'S OFFICE REGARDING
THIS NOTICE. Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice, may be
made to Lead Counsel: Hannah G. Ross, Esq., BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ
BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP, 1285 Avenue of the Americas, 38th Floor,
New York, NY 10019, Tel. No.: (800) 380-8496, email:
blbg@blbglaw.com

By Order of the Court

1 The WMI Class Securities are: Washington Mutual, Inc. ("WMI")
common stock; Floating Rate Notes due August 24, 2009, offered in
August 2006 ("Floating Rate Notes"); 7.250% Subordinated Notes due
November 1, 2017, offered in October 2007 ("7.250% Notes"); 7.75%
Series R Non-Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock,
offered in December 2007 ("Series R Stock"); and Washington Mutual
Capital Trust 2001's 5.375% Trust Preferred Income Equity
Redeemable Securities (PIERS) Units, maturing July 1, 2041.  Please
note, however, that only purchasers of Floating Rate Notes, 7.250%
Notes and Series R Stock will be eligible to receive proceeds of
the Settlement, if it is approved.

The full definition of the Class is set forth in the Stipulation
and Agreement of Settlement with the Underwriter Defendants dated
June 30, 2011 (the "Underwriter Stipulation").  All capitalized
terms that are not otherwise defined herein have the meanings
provided in the Stipulation and Order Regarding Proofs of Claim of
Brockton Contributory Retirement System, et al. (No. 5765, as
Amended by No. 6802, and 5762) and Limited Related Stay Relief
dated March 20, 2015 (the "Stipulation") or in the Underwriter
Stipulation, both of which are available at
www.WashingtonMutualSecuritiesLitigationSettlement.com

2 The earlier settlements were: (i) a $105 million settlement with
certain former officers and directors of Washington Mutual Inc.
("WMI") and WMI; (ii) an $85 million settlement with certain
underwriters of WMI securities' offerings other than Lehman (the
"Underwriter Settlement"); and (iii) an $18.5 million settlement
with Deloitte & Touche LLP.

3 Class Members who purchased any of the Relevant Securities and
receive a distribution with respect to those securities as the
result of a Claim-in-Process or Disputed Claim that is approved for
payment will also be eligible.

4 "Effective Date" means the date on which the District Court
enters an order approving the Settlement on the terms and
conditions set forth in the Stipulation and that order has become
Final (as that term is defined in the Stipulation).

                     About Lehman Brothers

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. -- http://www.lehman.com/-- was the
fourth largest investment bank in the United States.  For more than
150 years, Lehman Brothers has been a leader in the global
financial markets by serving the financial needs of corporations,
governmental units, institutional clients and
individuals worldwide.

Lehman Brothers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Sept. 15, 2008
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 08-13555).  Lehman's bankruptcy petition
disclosed US$639 billion in assets and US$613 billion in debts,
effectively making the firm's bankruptcy filing the largest in U.S.
history.  Several other affiliates followed thereafter.

Affiliates Merit LLC, LB Somerset LLC and LB Preferred Somerset LLC
sought for bankruptcy protection in December 2009.

The Debtors' bankruptcy cases are handled by Judge James M. Peck.
Harvey R. Miller, Esq., Richard P. Krasnow, Esq., Lori R. Fife,
Esq., Shai Y. Waisman, Esq., and Jacqueline Marcus, Esq., at Weil,
Gotshal & Manges, LLP, in New York, represent Lehman.  Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions serves as claims and noticing agent.

Dennis F. Dunne, Esq., Evan Fleck, Esq., and Dennis O'Donnell,
Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, in New York, serve as
counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  Houlihan
Lokey Howard & Zukin Capital, Inc., is the Committee's investment
banker.

On Sept. 19, 2008, the Honorable Gerard E. Lynch of the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York, entered an
order commencing liquidation of Lehman Brothers, Inc., pursuant to
the provisions of the Securities Investor Protection Act (Case No.
08-CIV-8119 (GEL)).  James W. Giddens has been appointed as trustee
for the SIPA liquidation of the business of LBI.

The Bankruptcy Court approved Barclays Bank Plc's purchase of
Lehman Brothers' North American investment banking and capital
markets operations and supporting infrastructure for US$1.75
billion.  Nomura Holdings Inc., the largest brokerage house in
Japan, purchased LBHI's operations in Europe for US$2 plus the
retention of most of employees.  Nomura also bought Lehman's
operations in the Asia Pacific for US$225 million.

Lehman emerged from bankruptcy protection on March 6, 2012, more
than three years after it filed the largest bankruptcy in U.S.
history.  The Chapter 11 plan for the Lehman companies other than
the broker was confirmed in December 2011.

As of Oct. 2, 2014, Lehman's total distributions to unsecured
creditors have amounted to $92.0 billion.  As of Sept. 30, 2014,
the brokerage trustee has substantially completed customer claims
distributions, distributing more than $106 billion to 111,000
customers.


LEHMAN BROTHERS: Settles Derivatives Dispute Over Putnam Swaps
--------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Checkler, writing for Dow Jones' Daily Bankruptcy Review,
reported that Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. settled a
multimillion-dollar derivatives dispute involving mutual-fund giant
Putnam Investments, ending litigation over a series of swap
agreements.

According to the report, in a July 6 filing with U.S. Bankruptcy
Court in Manhattan, Lehman said a unit of U.S. Bancorp, the trustee
for the Putnam swaps, would pay the failed investment bank an
undisclosed sum to settle the matter.  The dispute was over a
series of swap agreements that defaulted when Lehman collapsed into
bankruptcy nearly seven years ago.

                      About Lehman Brothers

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. was the fourth largest investment
bank in the United States.  For more than 150 years, Lehman
Brothers has been a leader in the global financial markets by
serving the financial needs of corporations, governmental units,
institutional clients and individuals worldwide.

Lehman Brothers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Sept. 15, 2008
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 08-13555).  Lehman's bankruptcy petition
disclosed US$639 billion in assets and US$613 billion in debts,
effectively making the firm's bankruptcy filing the largest in
U.S. history.  Several other affiliates followed thereafter.

Affiliates Merit LLC, LB Somerset LLC and LB Preferred Somerset
LLC sought for bankruptcy protection in December 2009.

The Debtors' bankruptcy cases are handled by Judge James M. Peck.
Harvey R. Miller, Esq., Richard P. Krasnow, Esq., Lori R. Fife,
Esq., Shai Y. Waisman, Esq., and Jacqueline Marcus, Esq., at
Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, in New York, represent Lehman.  Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions serves as claims and noticing agent.

Dennis F. Dunne, Esq., Evan Fleck, Esq., and Dennis O'Donnell,
Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, in New York, serve
as counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.
Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Capital, Inc., is the Committee's
investment banker.

On Sept. 19, 2008, the Honorable Gerard E. Lynch of the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York, entered an
order commencing liquidation of Lehman Brothers, Inc., pursuant to
the provisions of the Securities Investor Protection Act (Case No.
08-CIV-8119 (GEL)).  James W. Giddens has been appointed as
trustee for the SIPA liquidation of the business of LBI.

The Bankruptcy Court approved Barclays Bank Plc's purchase of
Lehman Brothers' North American investment banking and capital
markets operations and supporting infrastructure for US$1.75
billion.  Nomura Holdings Inc., the largest brokerage house in
Japan, purchased LBHI's operations in Europe for US$2 plus the
retention of most of employees.  Nomura also bought Lehman's
operations in the Asia Pacific for US$225 million.

Lehman emerged from bankruptcy protection on March 6, 2012, more
than three years after it filed the largest bankruptcy in U.S.
history.  The Chapter 11 plan for the Lehman companies other than
the broker was confirmed in December 2011.

As of Oct. 2, 2014, Lehman's total distributions to unsecured
creditors have amounted to $92.0 billion.  As of Sept. 30, 2014,
the brokerage trustee has substantially completed customer claims
distributions, distributing more than $106 billion to 111,000
customers.


LIGHTSTREAM RESOURCES: Moody's Affirms Caa2 CFR & Negative Outlook
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed Lightstream Resources Ltd.'s
Caa2 Corporate Family Rating and negative outlook, revised its
Probability of Default Rating (PDR) to Caa2-PD/LD (limited default)
from Caa2-PD, downgraded the senior unsecured notes rating to Ca
from Caa3 and raised its Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating to
SGL-3 from SGL-4.  The outlook remains negative.  The PDR will be
revised back to Caa2-PD after three business days.  On July 2,
2015, Lightstream announced an agreement with certain note holders
to exchange US$465 million of senior unsecured notes for
approximately US$395 million in second-lien notes (unrated), in
addition to issuing US$200 million of new second-lien notes.
Moody's considers the transaction to be a distressed exchange,
which also increases Lightstream's liquidity and subordinates the
remaining US$335 million of senior unsecured notes to the new
second-lien debt.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Lightstream Resources Ltd

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture (Foreign Currency)
   Feb 1, 2020, Downgraded to Ca from Caa3

Upgrades:

Issuer: Lightstream Resources Ltd

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Upgraded to SGL-3 from SGL-4

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Lightstream Resources Ltd
  Outlook, Remains Negative

Affirmations:

Issuer: Lightstream Resources Ltd

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Caa2-PD /LD
   (/LD appended)
  Corporate Family Rating (Foreign Currency), Affirmed Caa2

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Caa2 CFR primarily reflects Lightstream's high debt level and
untenable capital structure, very low leveraged full-cycle ratio
(LFCR), and a declining reserves and production base.  Lightstream
has a base decline rate that requires significant sustaining capex
to maintain production which it currently cannot afford.

The SGL-3 rating reflects adequate liquidity through mid-2016.  As
of March 31, 2015 and pro forma for the new US$200 million
second-lien notes issuance in mid-July, Lightstream will have no
cash and about C$350 million available under its C$750 million
revolving credit facility due June 2017.  Moody's expects C$50
million of negative free cash flow through mid-2016, which will be
funded under its revolving credit facility.  Moody's expects
Lightstream to be well in compliance with its sole financial
covenant.  If Lightstream is successful in selling its remaining
core Bakken properties then the proceeds would go to repay secured
debt, including drawings under the revolver, and there would be a
reduction in the commitment level, although some additional
liquidity might be created in transaction.

The senior unsecured notes are rated Ca, two notches below the Caa2
CFR, reflecting the amount of priority-ranking debt in the capital
structure in the form of the new second-lien notes and secured
revolver.  Moody's believes that the Ca rating is more appropriate
for the senior unsecured notes than the Caa3 rating suggested by
Moody's Loss Given Default Methodology based on its fundamental
view of recovery, as the notes rank behind about C$1.5 billion of
priority ranking debt.

The negative outlook reflects Lightstream's declining production
from lower investment and untenable capital structure.

The rating could be upgraded if Lightstream can maintain production
and interest coverage above 1.5x.

The rating could be downgraded if there is any further
deterioration in liquidity.

Lightstream, a Calgary, Alberta-based oil and gas exploration and
production company, is focused on developing light oil resources in
the Saskatchewan Bakken formation and the Cardium formation in
central Alberta.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global
Independent Exploration and Production Industry published in
December 2011. Other methodologies used include Loss Given Default
for Speculative-Grade Non-Financial Companies in the U.S., Canada
and EMEA published in June 2009.


LYONS PROFESSIONAL: Former Workers' Judgment Bid Granted
--------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brian M. Cogan of the United States District Court of the
Eastern District of New York granted a motion for judgment filed by
Keesa Mitchell, et al., against Garrison Protective Services, Inc.,
in the case captioned KEESHA MITCHELL, THERESA CAMPBELL, SEANETTE
CAMPBELL and TANISHA SELBY, Plaintiffs, v. LYONS PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES, INC., RICHARD TRIM AND TERRY TATUM, Defendants, Case No.
09 CIV. 1587 (BMC), (E.D.N.Y.).

The issue posed in the case is whether the customer accounts of an
insolvent service company, where each customer had the right to
terminate service at any time, can nevertheless have value, such
that if the principal of the business moves those customers to a
third party in exchange for money, and the company receives nothing
(leaving creditors of the company without recourse), the
transaction is avoidable as a fraudulent conveyance under New
York's enactment of the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act.  The
Plaintiffs are judgment creditors of a now defunct security guard
company called Lyons Professional Services, Inc., in the total
amount of $266,590.  The owner and manager of LPS was defendant
Christopher Lyons.  The Plaintiffs, former employees of LPS,
obtained their judgment on default after demonstrating that they
had been the victims of egregious sexual harassment and sexual
assault by other LPS employees.  Christopher Lyons entered into a
"consulting agreement" with Garrison, the garnishee in the action.
Lyons was paid $300,000 to move LPS' customer accounts to
Garrison.

Judge Cogan granted the the plaintiffs' motion for judgment against
Garrison and directed the Court of Clerk to enter judgment in favor
of the plaintiffs and against Lyons and Garrison, jointly and
severally, in the amount of $266,590.  Judge Cogan held that the
interest being conveyed belonged to LPS because Mr. Lyons had
chosen to do business as an employee of LPS and elected to take the
advantages that derived from the corporate form, like limited
liability and Subchapter S tax treatment.  Having chosen to operate
not as a sole proprietorship but as a corporation, and having
developed and mined those contacts for the benefit of LPS, Judge
Cogan does not believe that Mr. Lyons had the right to pull back
that business opportunity like a yo-yo for his own benefit and the
detriment of his creditors, including, at least, the plaintiffs
here.  Further, Garrison had no interest in Lyons' services; the
"consulting agreement" was meant to transfer only what it did
transfer: the business of LPS' customers and the opportunity that
it presented, Judge Cogan noted.

Chidi Anthony Eze, Esq. -- of Chidi Eze, Esq. -- serves as counsel
for Plaintiffs Keesha Mitchell, Theresa Campbell and Seannette
Campbell

John L. Sampson, Esq. -- of Law Office of John L. Sampson serves as
counsel for Defendant Richard Trim

A full-text copy of the Judge Cogan's Memorandum Decision and Order
dated June 8, 2015 available at http://is.gd/stBs1bfrom
Leagle.com.



MANISTIQUE PAPERS: Seeks Dismissal of Chapter 11 Case
-----------------------------------------------------
Manistique Papers Liquidation Company, Inc., and the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware to dismiss the Debtor's Chapter 11 case
or, in the alternative, convert it to a Chapter 7 case.

The Debtor's counsel, Daniel B. Butz, Esq., at Morris, Nichols,
Arsht & Tunnell LLP, in Wilmington, Delaware, tells the Court that
the Debtor and the Committee believe that the Debtor is
substantially current in its obligations to pay the U.S. Trustee
Fees.  Mr. Butz says any outstanding U.S. Trustee Fees will be
paid.  He further tells the Court that the Debtor currently has
funds of $619,440 available for distribution and proposes to pay
these funds on a pro rata basis among the remaining approved claims
for professional fees and the two allowed administrative claims.
Mr. Butz adds that because the assets of the Debtor's estate are
limited and priority and general unsecured claims will not receive
any distribution, the Committee does not propose to continue to
undertake an extensive claims reconciliation process.

Mr. Butz relates that the Debtor no longer conducts any business
and has no remaining assets that could be used to satisfy the
claims of any class of creditors other than the U.S. Trustee Fees,
the Professional Fee Claims and the Claims Agent Fees and, on a pro
rata basis only, the Administrative Claims.  Meanwhile, additional
expenses, like professional fees and U.S. Trustee fees, continue to
accrue each day the Chapter 11 case remains open, resulting in a
continuing loss to the Debtor's estate, Mr. Butz tells the Court.
Mr. Butz asserts that it is simply impossible for the Debtor to
rehabilitate its business because the Debtor has transferred all of
its assets and has ceased operations.

The Motion is scheduled for hearing on August 18, 2015, at 2:45 pm.
The deadline for the submission of objections to the Motion is
July 9.

The Debtor is represented by:

          Eric D. Schwartz, Esq.
          Daniel B. Butz, Esq.
          Matthew B. Harvey, Esq.
          MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNEL LLP
          1201 North Market Street, 18th Floor
          P.O. Box 1347
          Wilmington, DE 19899
          Telephone: (302)658-9200
          Facsimile: (302)658-4673
          Email:  eschwartz@mnat.com
                  dbutz@mnat.com
                  mharvey@mnat.com

             -- and --

          Timothy F. Nixon, Esq.
          Carla O. Andres, Esq.
          GODFREY & KAHN, S.C.
          333 Main Street, Suite 600
          P.O. Box 13067
          Green Bay, WI 54307-3067
          Telephone: (920)436-7687
          Facsimile: (920)436-7988
          Email: tnixon@gklaw.com
                 candres@gklaw.com

The Committee is represented by:

          William P. Bowden, Esq.
          Amanda Winfree Hermann, Esq.
          Leigh-Anne M. Raport, Esq.
          ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A.
          500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
          P.O. Box 1150
          Wilmington, DE 19899
          Telephone: (302)654-1888
          Facsimile: (302)654-2067
          Email: WBowden@ashby-geddes.com
                 AHerrmann@ashby-geddes.com
                 LRaport@ashby-geddes.com

             -- and --

          Sharon L. Levine, Esq.
          S. Jason Teele, Esq.
          Nicole Stefanelli, Esq.
          LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP
          65 Livingston Avenue
          Roseland, New Jersey 07068
          Telephone: (973)597-2500
          Facsimile: (973)597-2400
          Email: krosen@lowenstein.com
                 slevine@lowenstein.com
                 steele@lowenstein.com

               About Manistique Papers

Manistique Papers Inc. operates a landfill in
Manistique,
Michigan, whereby residuals resulting from paper
production are
deposited. It owns a 125,000 ton-a-year plant
making specialty
papers from recycled fiber.



Manistique Papers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 11-12562) on Aug. 12, 2011.
Godfrey &
Kahn, S.C. represents the Debtor in its restructuring
effort.
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP serves as its
Delaware
bankruptcy co-counsel. Vector Consulting, L.L.C., serves
as its
financial advisor. Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLC, serves
as its
accountant.



The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed in
the
case is represented by Lowenstein Sandler PC as lead counsel
and
Ashby & Geddes, P.A., as Delaware counsel. J.H. Cohn LLC
serves
as the panel's financial advisor.



Manistique Papers disclosed $19,688,471 in assets and
$24,633,664
in liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.


MF GLOBAL: Corzine, Ex-Officials Settle Suit for $64.5-Mil.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Checkler, writing for Dow Jones' Daily Bankruptcy Review,
reported that Jon S. Corzine and other former MF Global officials
will pay $64.5 million to settle an investor lawsuit, the first
time the former New Jersey governor has agreed to pay those who
lost money in the failed brokerage firm.

According to the report, in a July 7 filing with the U.S. District
Court in Manhattan, lawyers for former MF Global shareholders led
by the Virginia Retirement System and the Queen of Alberta, Canada,
said ex-MF Chief Executive Mr. Corzine, as well as former finance
chief Henri J. Steenkamp and other former employees, will pay the
money in cash.

                          About MF Global

New York-based MF Global -- http://www.mfglobal.com/-- was one of


the world's leading brokers of commodities and listed derivatives.
MF Global provides access to more than 70 exchanges around the
world.  The firm also was one of 22 primary dealers authorized to
trade U.S. government securities with the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York.  MF Global's roots go back nearly 230 years to a sugar
brokerage on the banks of the Thames River in London.

On Oct. 31, 2011, MF Global Holdings Ltd. and MF Global Finance
USA Inc. filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case Nos. 11-15059 and 11-5058), after a planned sale to
Interactive Brokers Group collapsed.  As of Sept. 30, 2011, MF
Global had $41,046,594,000 in total assets and $39,683,915,000 in
total liabilities.

On Nov. 7, 2011, the United States Trustee appointed the statutory
creditors' committee in the Debtors' cases.  At the behest of the
Statutory Creditor's Committee, the Court directed the U.S.
Trustee to appoint a chapter 11 trustee.  On Nov. 28, 2011, the
Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the appointment of
Louis J. Freeh, Esq., of Freeh Group International Solutions, LLC,
as Chapter 11 trustee.

On Dec. 19, 2011, MF Global Capital LLC, MF Global Market Services
LLC and MF Global FX Clear LLC filed voluntary Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case Nos. 11-15808, 11-15809 and
11-15810).  On Dec. 27, the Court entered an order installing Mr.
Freeh as Chapter 11 Trustee of the New Debtors.

On March 2, 2012, MF Global Holdings USA Inc. filed a voluntary
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 12-10863), and Mr.
Freeh also was installed as its Chapter 11 Trustee.

Judge Honorable Martin Glenn presides over the Chapter 11 case.
J. Gregory Milmoe, Esq., Kenneth S. Ziman, Esq., and J. Eric
Ivester, Esq., at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, serve
as bankruptcy counsel.  The Garden City Group, Inc., serves as
claims and noticing agent.  The petition was signed by Bradley I.
Abelow, Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of MF
Global Finance USA Inc.

The Chapter 11 Trustee has tapped (i) Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan
LLP, as investigative counsel; (ii) FTI Consulting Inc., as
restructuring advisors; (iii) Morrison & Foerster LLP, as
bankruptcy counsel; and (iv) Pepper Hamilton as special counsel.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has retained
Capstone Advisory Group LLC as financial advisor, while lawyers at
Proskauer Rose LLP serve as counsel.

The Securities Investor Protection Corporation commenced
liquidation proceedings against MF Global Inc. to protect
customers.  James W. Giddens was appointed as trustee pursuant to
the Securities Investor Protection Act.  He is a partner at Hughes
Hubbard & Reed LLP in New York.

Jon Corzine, the former New Jersey governor and co-CEO of
Goldman Sachs Group Inc., stepped down as chairman and chief
executive officer of MF Global just days after the bankruptcy
filing.

In April 2013, the Bankruptcy Court approved MF Global Holdings'
plan to liquidate its assets.  Bloomberg News reported that the
court-approved disclosure statement initially told
creditors with $1.134 billion in unsecured claims against the
parent holding company why they could expect a recovery of 13.4%
to 39.1% from the plan.  As a consequence of a settlement with
JPMorgan, supplemental materials informed unsecured creditors
their recovery was reduced to the range of 11.4% to 34.4%.  Bank
lenders will have the same recovery on their $1.174 billion claim
against the holding company.  As a consequence of the settlement,
the predicted recovery became 18% to 41.5% for holders of $1.19
billion in unsecured claims against the finance subsidiary,
one of the companies under the umbrella of the holding company
trustee.  Previously, the predicted recovery was 14.7% to 34% on
bank lenders' claims against the finance subsidiary.


MIG LLC: July 30 Hearing on Bid to Extend Deadline to Remove Suits
------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware is set to hold a hearing on
July 30 to consider MIG LLC's bid to extend the deadline to remove
lawsuits involving the company and its affiliate ITC Cellular LLC.

In its motion filed with the court, the company proposed to extend
the deadline to August 24.

Objections to the proposed extension must be filed on or before
July 23.

                           About MIG LLC

Formerly operating under the name "Metromedia International Group,
Inc.," MIG LLC -- http://www.migllc-group.com/-- owned and   
operated and sold dozens of companies in diverse industries,
including entertainment, photo finishing, garden equipment and
sporting goods, until the late 1990s.  In 1997 and 1998, MIG
consummated the sale of substantially all of its U.S.-based
entertainment assets and began focusing on expanding into emerging
communications and media businesses.  By 2005, all of MIG's
operating businesses were located in the Republic of Georgia and
operated through its subsidiaries.

MIG LLC and affiliate ITC Cellular, LLC, filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection on June 30, 2014.  The cases are currently
jointly administered under Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 14-11605.
As of the bankruptcy filing, MIG's sole valuable asset, beyond its
existing cash, is its indirect interest in Magticom Ltd.  The cases
are assigned to Judge Kevin Gross.  MIG LLC disclosed $15.9 million
in assets and $254 million in liabilities.

Headquartered in Tbilisi, Georgia, Magticom is the leading mobile
telephony operator in Georgia and is also the largest telephone
operator in Georgia.  Magticom serves 2.4 million subscribers with
a network that covers 97% of the populated regions in Georgia.
Magticom is owned by International Telcell Cellular, LLC, which is
46% owned by MIG unit ITC Cellular, 51% owned by Dr. George
Jokhtaberidze, and 3% owned by Gemstone Management Ltd.

Formerly known as MIG, Inc., MIG was a debtor in a previous case
(Bankr. D. Del. Case NO. 09-12118). It obtained approval of its
reorganization plan in November 2010.

The Debtors have tapped Greenberg Traurig LLP as counsel, Fox
Rothschild Inc. as financial advisor; Cousins Chipman and Brown,
LLP as conflicts counsel; and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and notice
agent and administrative advisor.  The Debtors have retained
Natalia Alexeeva as chief restructuring officer.

A three-member panel has been appointed in these cases to serve as
the official committee of unsecured creditors, consisting of Walter
M. Grant, Paul N. Kiel, and Lawrence P. Klamon.


MOTORS LIQUIDATION: Bid to Recover Additional Amounts Denied
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert E. Gerber of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
South District of New York denied Doris Powledge Phillips' motion
to recover additional sums from Old GM's General Unsecured
Creditors Trust, finding that Mrs. Phillips lacks standing, both to
seek relief Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and
to recover on additional sums from the GUC Trust.

in the case captioned In re MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, et al.,
f/k/a General Motors Corp., et al., Debtors, Case No.:  09-50026
(REG) (JOINTLY ADMINISTERED), (S.D. NY)

Mrs. Phillips had an allowed claim in Old GM's chapter 11 case
after a settlement with Old GM, which she later sold to a hedge
fund, after she lost her husband and four children in a tragic
prepetition car accident in 2005.  Mrs. Phillips moves, pursuant to
Rule 60(b)(6), or alternatively Rules 60(b)(3) or 60(d), to be
relieved of her earlier settlement as a consequence of alleged Old
GM fraud in complying with discovery obligations before she entered
into her settlement.  She thereby seeks to recover additional sums
from Old GM's General Unsecured Creditors Trust and, apparently,
General Motors LLC, the acquirer of most of Old GM's assets in a
section 363 sale back in July 2009, beyond the amount she already
received when she sold her claim.

The GUC Trust and New GM oppose her motion, arguing that having
sold and assigned away her claim, Mrs. Phillips no longer has
standing to assert it, and that further relief would result in a
double recovery on the claim.  In additional points, they argue
further that relief under Rule 60(b)(3) is barred by the passage of
time and that relief under Rules 60(b)(6) and 60(d) is unavailable,
and that Mrs. Phillips expressly released any additional claims,
known or unknown, when she entered into her settlement.

Joshua P. Davis, Esq. -- josh@thejdfirm.com (argued) of JOSH DAVIS
LAW FIRM serves as counsel for Doris Phillips.

Arthur J. Steinberg, Esq. -- asteinberg@kslaw.com (argued) of KING
& SPALDING LLP serves as counsel for General Motors LLC (New GM).

The case is In re MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, et al., f/k/a General
Motors Corp., et al., Debtors, CASE NO. 09-50026 (REG) (JOINTLY
ADMINISTERED)(Bankr. S.D.N.Y.).

A full-text copy of Judge Gerber's Decision dated June 8, 2015, is
available at http://is.gd/XoRlGyfrom Leagle.com.

                      About Motors Liquidation

General Motors Corporation and three of its affiliates filed for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 09-50026) on
June 1, 2009.  The Honorable Robert E. Gerber presides over the
Chapter 11 cases.  Harvey R. Miller, Esq., Stephen Karotkin,
Esq., and Joseph H. Smolinsky, Esq., at Weil, Gotshal & Manges
LLP, assist the Debtors in their restructuring efforts.  Al Koch
at AP Services, LLC, an affiliate of AlixPartners, LLP, serves as
the Chief Executive Officer for Motors Liquidation Company.  GM
is also represented by Jenner & Block LLP and Honigman Miller
Schwartz and Cohn LLP as counsel.  Cravath, Swaine, & Moore LLP
is providing legal advice to the GM Board of Directors.  GM's
financial advisors are Morgan Stanley, Evercore Partners and the
Blackstone Group LLP.  Garden City Group is the claims and notice
agent of the Debtors.

The U.S. Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors and a separate Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors Holding Asbestos-Related Claims.  Lawyers at Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP served as bankruptcy counsel to the
Creditors Committee.  Attorneys at Butzel Long served as counsel
on supplier contract matters.  FTI Consulting Inc. served as
financial advisors to the Creditors Committee.  Elihu Inselbuch,
Esq., at Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered, represented the Asbestos
Committee.  Legal Analysis Systems, Inc., served as asbestos
valuation analyst.

The Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Debtors'
Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan on March 29, 2011.  The Plan
was declared effect on March 31.

On Dec. 15, 2011, Motors Liquidation Company was dissolved.  On
the Dissolution Date, pursuant to the Plan and the Motors
Liquidation Company GUC Trust Agreement, dated March 30, 2011,
between the parties thereto, the trust administrator and trustee
-- GUC Trust Administrator -- of the Motors Liquidation Company
GUC Trust, assumed responsibility for the affairs of and certain
claims against MLC and its debtor subsidiaries that were not
concluded prior to the Dissolution Date.

As of March 31, 2015, Motors Liquidation had $1.01 billion in
total
assets, $69.23 million in total liabilities and $944.73 million in
net assets in liquidation.


NAT'L CENTURY FINANCIAL: Dismissal of Poulsen's Suit Recommended
----------------------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King recommended the dismissal of the
case captioned LANCE K. POULSEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, Respondent, NOS. 2:13-CV-259, 2:06-CR-00129(1), CIV. NO.
2:13-CV-00261, NO. 2:07-CR-00209 (S.D. Ohio, Eastern Div.).

Lance K. Poulsen brought consolidated motions to vacate, set aside
or correct sentence on his convictions for securities fraud and
obstruction of justice.  His convictions stemmed from his money
laundering activities while he served as owner, chairman, and chief
executive officer at National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.
("NCFE") which eventually led to NCFE's bankruptcy.

Poulsen sought relief under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255. He asserted
that he was denied due process because he is legally innocent on
the money laundering-related convictions charged in Counts 17-20 of
the Superseding Indictment in view of Cuellar v. United States, 553
U.S. 550 (2008); that he was denied the effective assistance of
trial counsel and was denied the counsel of his choice; and that he
was denied a fair trial based on prosecutorial misconduct.

Poulsen referred at length to his attorneys' failure to raise an
issue under Cuellar, and argued that this failure constitutes
evidence of his claim of prosecutorial misconduct, interference
with the right to counsel of his choice, and the denial of the
effective assistance of counsel.

Judge King held that counsel's failure to raise an issue under
Cuellar does not support Poulsen's claim of prosecutorial
misconduct or the interference of his right to counsel of his
choice. He has failed to establish cause and prejudice for the
procedural default of his claims, that the government denied him a
fair trial, or that the combined actions of the prosecution
resulted in a denial of due process.

A copy of the May 29, 2015 report and recommendation is available
at http://is.gd/xyzjnyfrom Leagle.com.

Randolph H Speer, Petitioner, Pro Se.

Lance K Poulsen, Petitioner, represented by David Freeman Axelrod
-- daxelrod@slk-law.com -- Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP.

Donald H Ayers, Petitioner, Pro Se.

USA, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin C Glassman, U.S. Attorney's
Office, Douglas W. Squires, United States Attorney Office, John J.
Stark, US Attorney Office, Kathleen McGovern, N. Nathan Dimock,
Department of Justice, Bethany J Hamilton, Assistant United States
Attorney, Christopher Keen Barnes, US Attorney, Colleen Ann Conry,
US Dept. of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section, Deborah F
Sanders, United States Attorney's Office, Jeffrey Neiman, United
States Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Leo Wise, United
States Department of Justice, N. Nathan Dimock, Department of
Justice,Nicole H Sprinzen, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal
Division, Fraud Section & Wes R Porter, US Department of Justice.

                     About National Century

Headquartered in Dublin, Ohio, National Century Financial
Enterprises, Inc. -- http://www.ncfe.com/-- was the largest  
issuer of medical accounts receivable asset backed securities in
the United States before it collapsed in bankruptcy in November
2002 amid allegations of widespread fraud and misappropriation of
assets.  To date, 10 senior executives of the company have been
convicted or pled guilty to federal charges of conspiracy,
securities fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering arising out of
the NCFE securitization program.

NCFE -- through the CSFB Claims Trust, the Litigation Trust, the
VI/XII Collateral Trust, and the Unencumbered Assets Trust -- is
liquidating estate assets.  The Company filed for Chapter 11
protection on November 18, 2002 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio Case No.
02-65235).  The Court confirmed the Debtors' Fourth Amended Plan of
Liquidation on April 16, 2004.  Paul E. Harner, Esq., at Jones Day,
represented the Debtors.


NEW LIFE INT'L: Amends Schedule of Nonpriority Unsecured Claims
---------------------------------------------------------------
New Life International filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Tennessee a sixth amendment to its schedule of
non-priority unsecured claims (Schedule F).  A copy of the
amendment is available for free at:
   
http://bankrupt.com/misc/NewLifeInternational_428_SAL_June17.pdf

                          About New Life

New Life International, a religious corporation originally
incorporated under the name "World Bible Society", sought Chapter
11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 13-bk-10974)
in Nashville, Tennessee, on Dec. 31, 2013.

The Debtor disclosed $44,651,301 in assets and $46,362,805 in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

NLI's sources of revenue include donations of goods, money and
other property, investment earnings, sale of Christian-themed
merchandise and earnings from other real estate and operating
entities.  Other names used by the Debtor are the National
Community Foundation, The New Life Group, and Band Angels.

The Debtor has tapped Gullett Sanford Robinson & Martin, PLLC as
attorneys and Kraft CPAs Turnaround & Restructuring Group, PLLC,
as financial consultant.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 8 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors consisting of Robert T. Abbotts, Dorothy F.
Mack, James D. Rice, Richard M. Taylor, and Sharon L. Upton-Rice.
Bradley, Arant, Boult, Cumming LLP serves as counsel to the
Committee.

The Debtor obtained final approval of its Chapter 11 liquidating
plan on Sept. 2, 2014, after the state attorney general withdrew
its objection.



NOLAN TOWN CENTER: Case Summary & 15 Top Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Nolan Town Center, LLC
        250 NW Franklin Ave #204
        Bend, OR 97703

Case No.: 15-33273

Nature of Business: Single Asset Real Estate

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Oregon

Judge: Hon. Peter C McKittrick

Debtor's Counsel: Keith Y Boyd, Esq.
                  THE LAW OFFICES OF KEITH Y. BOYD
                  724 S Central Ave #106
                  Medford, OR 97501
                  Tel: (541) 973-2422
                  Email: ecf@boydlegal.net

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Donald N Bauhofer, manager, NTC
Management, manager.

A list of the Debtor's 15 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/oreb15-33273.pdf


NORTEL NETWORKS: Bankr. Court Can't Enter Final Judgment v. Avaya
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned SNMP Research International, Inc. and SNMP
Research, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Nortel Networks Inc., et al., and
Avaya Inc., Defendants, ADV. NO. 11-53454(KG) (Bankr. D. Del.),
Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross found that the plaintiffs have not
consented to the bankruptcy court's authority to issue final orders
or judgments on SNMP's claims against a non-debtor defendant for
non-core claims.

SNMP Research International, Inc. and SNMP Research, Inc. filed a
complaint against debtor Nortel Networks Inc. and its United States
affiliates, and Avaya Inc. and others. SNMP filed a Motion for
Determination That This Court Lacks Authority to Enter Final Orders
or Judgments as to Claims Against Avaya, Inc.

The parties agreed that the claims against Avaya for copyright
infringement, misappropriation of trade secrets under state law and
breach of contract were clearly none-core claims. Avaya and the
Debtors contended that SNMP has consented to the court's authority
by virtue of its action and failure to act in a timely manner. They
pointed to the facts that SNMP filed the complaints in the
bankruptcy court when it could have brought suit against Avaya in
the district court, asked the court for relief without limitation,
did not timely object to the court's consideration of Radware Inc's
motion to dismiss, and then very belatedly moved before the
district court to withdraw the reference.

Judge Gross, however, found that SNMP had not given consent because
it expressly gave notice in the complaints that it was reserving
its rights and, indeed, that it intended to seek withdrawal of the
reference because it was not submitting itself to the bankruptcy
court's authority to enter final orders. Further, SNMP's request
for a jury trial fortifies its position that it has not consented
to the court's authority.

Following the bankruptcy filing, Nortel Networks sold their
Enterprise Solutions Business assets to Avaya Inc.

A copy of the June 2, 2015 opinion is available at
http://is.gd/WRlhALfrom Leagle.com.

                       About Nortel Networks

Headquartered in Ontario, Canada, Nortel Networks Corporation and
its affiliated entities provided technologies support multimedia
and business-critical applications.  Networks Limited was the
principal direct operating subsidiary of Nortel Networks
Corporation.

Nortel Networks Corporation, and certain of their Canadian
affiliates commenced a proceeding with the Ontario Superior Court
of Justice under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada)
seeking relief from their creditors.  Ernst & Young was appointed
to serve as monitor and foreign representative of the Canadian
Nortel Group.  The monitor also sought recognition of the CCAA
Proceedings in U.S. Bankruptcy Court (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
09-10164) under Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

NNI and certain of its affiliated U.S. entities filed Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 09-10138).

In addition, the High Court of England and Wales placed 19 of
NNI's European affiliates into administration under the control of
individuals from Ernst & Young LLP.  Other Nortel affiliates have
commenced and in the future may commence additional creditor
protection, insolvency and dissolution proceedings around the
world.

On May 28, 2009, at the request of administrators, the Commercial
Court of Versailles, France, ordered the commencement of secondary
proceedings in respect of Nortel Networks S.A.  On June 8, 2009,
Nortel Networks UK Limited filed petitions in U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for recognition of the English Proceedings as foreign main
proceedings under Chapter 15.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross presides over the Chapter 11 and
15 cases.  Mary Caloway, Esq., and Peter James Duhig, Esq., at
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, in Wilmington, Delaware, serves as
Chapter 15 petitioner's counsel.

In the Chapter 11 case, James L. Bromley, Esq., and Howard S.
Zelbo, Esq., at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, LLP, in New
York, serve as the U.S. Debtors' general bankruptcy counsel; Derek
C. Abbott, Esq., at Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, in
Wilmington, serves as Delaware counsel.  The Chapter 11 Debtors'
other professionals are Lazard Freres & Co. LLC as financial
advisors; and Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC as claims and notice
agent.

The U.S. Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors in respect of the U.S. Debtors.

An ad hoc group of bondholders also was organized.  An Official
Committee of Retired Employees and the Official Committee of
Long-Term Disability Participants tapped Alvarez & Marsal
Healthcare Industry Group as financial advisor.  The Retiree
Committee is represented by McCarter & English LLP as Delaware
counsel, and Togut Segal & Segal serves as the Retiree Committee.
The Committee retained Alvarez & Marsal Healthcare Industry Group
as financial advisor, and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as its
communications agent.

Several entities, particularly, Nortel Government Solutions
Incorporated and Nortel Networks (CALA) Inc., have material
operations and are not part of the bankruptcy proceedings.

As of Sept. 30, 2008, Nortel Networks Corp. reported consolidated
assets of $11.6 billion and consolidated liabilities of $11.8
billion.  The Nortel Companies' U.S. businesses are primarily
conducted through Nortel Networks Inc., which is the parent of
majority of the U.S. Nortel Companies.  As of Sept. 30, 2008, NNI
had assets of about $9 billion and liabilities of $3.2 billion,
which do not include NNI's guarantee of some or all of the Nortel
Companies' about $4.2 billion of unsecured public debt.

Since the commencement of the various insolvency proceedings,
Nortel has sold its business units and other assets to various
purchasers.  Nortel has collected roughly $9 billion for
distribution to creditors.  Of the total, $4.5 billion came from
the sale of Nortel's patent portfolio to Rockstar Bidco, a
consortium consisting of Apple Inc., EMC Corporation,
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Microsoft Corp., Research In
Motion Limited, and Sony Corporation.  The consortium defeated a
$900 million stalking horse bid by Google Inc. at an auction.  The
deal closed in July 2011.

Nortel has filed a proposed plan of liquidation in the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court.  The Plan generally provides for full payment on
secured claims with other distributions going in accordance with
the priorities in bankruptcy law.

The trial on how to divide proceeds among creditors in the U.S.,
Canada, and Europe commenced on Sept. 22, 2014.  The question of
how to divide $7.3 billion raised in the international bankruptcy
of Nortel Networks Corp. was answered on May 12, 2015, by two
judges, one in the U.S. and one in Canada.

According to The Wall Street Journal, Justice Frank Newbould of
the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Toronto and Judge Kevin
Gross of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Del., agreed on
the outcome: a modified pro rata split of the money.


OVERSEAS SHIPHOLDING: Maritime's Rejection Damages Claim Tossed
---------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Mary F. Walrath disallowed the alleged rejection
damages claim that Maritime Overseas Corporation filed against
Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.

A general unsecured claim was filed by Maritime against Overseas
Shipholding for $30,788.32 for return of its security deposit under
a sublease agreement that it previously had with the Debtor.
Maritime later filed an amended claim adding $367,858 for damages
from the rejection of the sublease.

The Debtor filed an Objection to Maritime's Amended Claim, seeking
to disallow any rejection damages and to limit the allowed claim to
the amount of the security deposit.  The Debtor argued that under
Clause 2 of the sublease agreement, the Debtor is not liable to
Maritime for any damages in the event of an early "termination."
The Debtor also argued that a separate provision of the sublease
agreement, Clause 22(j), bars Maritime from seeking damages from
the Debtor or its affiliates for any reason.

While Judge Walrath held that Clause 2 is not applicable, she
agreed with the Debtor that Clause 22(j) bars Maritime's rejection
damages claim. She also held that although Maritime may seek
damages as a general unsecured claim under Section 365(h) of the
Bankruptcy Code, it is not entitled to any greater rights under the
said section that it has under state law.

As such, Judge Walrath sustained the Debtor's Objection to
Maritime's Amended Claim and reduced and allowed Maritime's Amended
Claim as a general unsecured claim in the amount of $30,788.32.

A copy of the June 1, 2015 memorandum opinion is available at
http://is.gd/RdZP9Efrom Leagle.com.

                    About Overseas Shipholding

Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. (OTC: OSGIQ), headquartered in New
York, is one of the largest publicly traded tanker companies in the
world, engaged primarily in the ocean transportation of crude oil
and petroleum products.  OSG owns or operates 111 vessels that
transport oil and petroleum products throughout the world.

Overseas Shipholding Group and 180 affiliates filed voluntary
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 12-20000) on
Nov. 14, 2012, disclosing $4.15 billion in assets and $2.67 billion
in liabilities.  

The Debtors tapped Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP as counsel;
Arsht & Tunnell LLP, as local counsel; Chilmark Partners LLC, as
financial adviser; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC, as claims
and notice agent.  The official committee of unsecured creditors
tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, and Pepper Hamilton LLP,
as co-counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc., as financial advisor; and
Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc., as investment banker.  The official
committee of equity security holders tapped Brown Rudnick LLP and
Fox Rothschild LLP as attorneys.

Creditor Export-Import Bank of China engaged Fulbright & Jaworski
LLP and Richards Layton & Finger PA as counsel, and Chilmark
Partners, LLC as financial and restructuring advisor.  U.S. Bank
National Association, the successor administrative agent under the
$1.5 billion credit agreement, tapped Milbank, Tweed, Hadley &
McCloy LLP; Holland & Knight LLP; and Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP as
counsel; and Lazard Freres & Co. LLC as advisor.

Judge Walsh signed in July 2014 entered an order confirming the
First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of OSG.  The Plan, which
became effective in August 2014, paid creditors in full.  A
blacklined version of the Plan dated July 17, 2014, is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/OSGplan0716.pdf

                          *     *     *

The Troubled Company Reporter, on Aug. 14, 2014, reported that
Moody's Investors Service assigned 'Caa1' ratings to the unsecured
notes of OSG that are being reinstated pursuant to its plan of
reorganization which becomes effective.  Moody's also affirmed the
'B2' Corporate Family Rating and all of the other debt ratings it
assigned to OSG on June 12, 2014 in anticipation of the conclusion
of the Chapter 11 reorganization.  The rating outlook is stable.

The TCR, on Aug. 19, 2014, also reported that Standard & Poor's
Ratings Services assigned its 'B' corporate credit rating to OSG.
The outlook is stable.


PATSY FIERRO: Bankruptcy Court Remands Suit to State Court
----------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Nancy Hershey Lord permissively abstained from
hearing the removed state court proceeding involving Chapter 11
debtor Patsy Fierro, and remanded the case to state court.

The case is captioned, J.C. Ryan EBCO/H&G LLC, on behalf of itself
and all other subcontractors similarly situated Plaintiff, v.
Cyber-Struct Inc., Louis Zuccaro, aka Lou Zuccaro, aka Louie
Zuccaro, Patrick Fierro, aka Patsy Fierro, aka Pat Fierro, Damon
Coromilas, Defendants. In re: Luigi Zucaro, aka Louis Zucaro,
Chapter 11, Debtor. J.C. Ryan EBCO/H&G LLC, on behalf of itself and
all other subcontractors similarly situated Plaintiff, v.
Cyber-Struct Inc., Louis Zuccaro, aka Lou Zuccaro, aka Louie
Zuccaro, Patrick Fierro, aka Patsy Fierro, aka Pat Fierro, Damon
Coromilas, Defendants, CASE NO. 1-14-41439-NHL, ADV. PRO. NO.
1-14-01068-NHL, CASE NO. 1-14-41440-NHL, ADV. PRO. NO.
1-14-01087-NHL (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.).

The state court found debtors Patsy Fierro and Luigi Zucaro liable
in a class action lawsuit for damages for their failure to pay
subcontractors on a construction project. Fierro and Zucaro twice
moved to vacate the state court judgment and, after filing a
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, removed the state court proceeding
to the bankruptcy court.

J.C. Ryan EBCO/H&G, LLC ("Ryan"), the lead plaintiff in the class
action lawsuit, opposed the removal, and moved for remand of the
proceeding to state court and relief from the automatic stay to
continue the action in that forum. Alternatively, Ryan requested
the bankruptcy court to abstain under the doctrines of mandatory or
permissive abstention.

Judge Lord concluded that permissive abstention is warranted
because the state court is more familiar with the case and can
likely adjudicate the issues more quickly, as the case has been
litigated in that court for over 12 years. Judge Lord also found it
proper to remand to the state court and to lift the stay to the
extent necessary for the parties to continue to prosecute and
defend the debtors' Second Motion to Vacate, as well as to continue
the appeal of the First Motion to Vacate.

A copy of the May 29, 2015 decision is available at
http://is.gd/ixjcjffrom Leagle.com.

Douglas J. Pick, Pick & Zabicki LLP, New York, NY Attorney for the
Debtors/Defendants.

Jay H. Berg, Cornicello Tendler & Baumel-Cornicello, New York, NY,
Attorney for the Debtors/Defendants.

Scott A. Mandelup -- asm@pryormandelup.com -- Pryor & Mandelup,
LLP, Westbury, NY Attorney for JC Ryan EBCO/H&G, LLC.

Richard L. Yellen -– ryellen@yellenlaw.com -- Richard L. Yellen &
Associates, LLP, New York, NY 10006, Attorney for JC Ryan EBCO/H&G,
LLC.

Patsy Fierro and Luigi Zucaro each filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition on March 27, 2014.


PILGRIM'S PRIDE: S&P Affirms 'BB+' CCR & Revises Outlook to Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its corporate credit
rating on Pilgrim's Pride Corp. (PPC) of 'BB+', and revised the
outlook to stable from positive.

S&P also affirmed the issue-level rating on the company's senior
secured $700 million revolving credit facility and $1 billion
first-lien term loan due 2020 at 'BBB'.  The recovery ratings are
unchanged at '1', indicating S&P's expectation for very high
recovery (90%-100%) in the event of a default.

S&P also affirmed the issue-level rating on the senior unsecured
notes due 2025 at 'BB+'.  The recovery rating is '3', indicating
S&P's expectation of (50%-70%, at the high end of the range)
recovery in the event of a payment default.

"The outlook revision to stable reflects a lower likelihood of an
upgrade following the announcement of JBS' acquisition of the
Cargill pork business," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst
Stephanie Harter.  "Despite our belief that PPC will sustain its
improved operating earnings and cash flow ratios, we expect JBS to
continue to be acquisitive and to maintain leverage at around
current levels in order to fund acquisitions."

Standard & Poor's caps the corporate credit rating on PPC at 'BB+',
the same as that of parent company JBS, reflecting JBS' majority
ownership of PPC and S&P's belief that PPC is a "highly strategic"
subsidiary.

The rating reflects S&P's belief that PPC's operations will
continue to stabilize, including lower feed costs and other
identified cost reduction initiatives in place.  S&P believes these
cost reductions and improved pricing practices have reduced the
company's earnings volatility, which should allow it to perform
better during weaker earnings cycles.  S&P continues to consider
current debt levels as somewhat stronger than the company's target
leverage profile (closer to 2x on a debt-to-EBITDA basis), and
believe the company could still raise additional debt over time,
possibly for acquisitions, and recapitalize closer to its target
leverage levels.  Still, S&P's "intermediate" financial risk and
"fair" business risk profile assessment for PPC remain unchanged.

S&P believes the company will sustain its improved EBITDA into 2015
thanks to the still-favorable outlook for the U.S. poultry
industry, which is benefiting from a combination of low feed costs,
a low risk of overproduction in the near term, and higher aggregate
beef and pork prices that support demand substitution to poultry
offerings.

S&P could lower the rating if it lowers that rating on JBS or if
operating performance unexpectedly weakens.  Alternatively, S&P
could raise the rating if operating performance and discretionary
cash flows continue to improve in 2016, which could revise upwards
S&P's assessment of PPC's financial risk profile.  A higher rating
is also contingent on an upgrade of JBS, as PPC's ratings are
currently capped by JBS' group credit profile.



PK FAMILY FUN: Case Summary & 11 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: PK Family Fun Center Corp
           dba PK'S Play Zone and Grille
        35246 US Highway 19 N.
        Palm Harbor, FL 34684

Case No.: 15-07012

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida (Tampa)

Debtor's Counsel: Jake C Blanchard, Esq.
                  BLANCHARD LAW, PA
                  12350 S Belcher Rd, 13B
                  Largo, FL 33773
                  Tel: 727-531-7068
                  Fax: 727-535-2086
                  Email: jake@jakeblanchardlaw.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Pramod Kerkar, president.

A list of the Debtor's 11 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb15-07012.pdf


PORT AGGREGATES: Plan of Reorganization Confirmed
-------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert Summerhays of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
West District of Louisiana, Lafayette Division, confirmed the
Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Port Aggregates, Inc.,
following a hearing held on June 9, 2015.

According to the approved Disclosure Statement, the Plan provides
for the payment of unclassified Allowed Administrative Expense
Claims and Allowed Priority Claims, and eight separate
classifications of Claims and Equity Interests.

Funds needed to make the required cash payments on the Effective
Date as required under the Plan will come from the financing
provided under and by the Regions Term Sheet provided by
Regions Bank and from the cash on hand of Reorganized Port
Aggregates.  Cash payments to be made after the Effective Date
shall be made from cash on hand of Port Aggregates.

The case is IN RE: PORT AGGREGATES, INC., CHAPTER 11, DEBTOR, CASE
NO. 14-51580 (W.D. La.).

A full-text copy of Judge Summerhays' Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law dated June 9, 2015 available at
http://is.gd/sZc3u4from Leagle.com.

Louis M. Phillips, Esq. -- lphillips@gordonarata.com -- Peter A.
Kopfinger, Esq. -- pkopfinger@gordonarata.com -- and Gerald H.
Schiff, Esq. -- gschiff@gordonarata.com -- Armistead M. Long, Esq.
-- along@gordonarata.com -- and Patrick "Rick" M. Shelby, Esq. --
pshelby@gordonarata.com -- of GORDON, ARATA, McCOLLAM, DUPLANTIS &
EAGAN, LLC, serve as counsel for Port Aggregates, Inc.

                      About Port Aggregates

Port Aggregates, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 14-51580) in Lafayette, Louisiana, on
Dec. 19, 2014, without stating a reason.  The Debtor disclosed
$34,145,728 in assets and $15,720,035 in liabilities as of the
Chapter 11 filing.  

The case is assigned to Judge Robert Summerhays.  The Debtor has
tapped Louis M. Phillips, Esq., at Gordon, Arata, McCollam,
Duplantis & Eagan LLC, as counsel.

The petition was signed by Andrew L. Guinn, Sr., president.

The Debtor recently submitted amended schedules.  Copies are
available for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/PortAggregates_148_amendedSAL_D.pdf
   http://bankrupt.com/misc/PortAggregates_147_amendedSAL_A.pdf

Douglas S. Draper was appointed as examiner for the Debtor's case.


PRINT HARMONY: Case Summary & 15 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Print Harmony, LLC
        12910 Automobile Blvd. Suite D
        Clearwater, FL 33767

Case No.: 15-06982

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United Sates Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida (Tampa)

Debtor's Counsel: David W Steen, Esq.
                  DAVID W STEEN PA
                  602 S Boulevard
                  Tampa, FL 33606
                  Tel: (813) 251-3000
                  Fax: (813) 251-3100
                  Email: dwsteen@dsteenpa.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Jason Gabay, managing member.

A list of the Debtor's 15 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb15-06982.pdf


QUICK CASH: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Quick Cash, Inc., a New Mexico corporation
           dba Cash Cow Loan Company
           dba Cash Cow Furniture
           dba Cash Cow Tires & Service
        1310 Metro Avenue
        Gallup, NM 87031

Case No.: 15-11800

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       New Mexico (Albuquerque)

Judge: Hon. Robert H. Jacobvitz

Debtor's Counsel: Daniel J Behles, Esq.
                  MOORE, BERKSON, BASSAN & BEHLES P.C.
                  3800 Osuna Rd NE, STE #2
                  Albuquerque, NM 87109
                  Tel: 505-242-1218
                  Fax: 505-242-2836
                  Email: dan@behles.com

Total Assets: $9.6 million

Total Liabilities: $7.1 million

The petition was signed by Timothy Delgado, president.

A list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/nmb15-11800.pdf


QUINTO & WILKS: Involuntary Chapter 7 Petition Dismissed
--------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Brian F. Kenney dismissed the involuntary Chapter
7 petition filed against Quinto & Wilks, P.C., Case No.
14-13937-BFK (Bankr. E.D. Va., Alexandria Div.).

The Involuntary Petition was filed on October 22, 2014, against
Quinto & Wilks, P.C. by its former employee, Jenine E. Graves. The
Involuntary Petition was filed by Graves as a single creditor
petition. At the time of the petition, Ms. Graves and Quinto &
Wilks were engaged in highly acrimonious litigation in the Circuit
of Prince William County.

Quinto & Wilks filed a Motion to Dismiss, arguing that: (1) Ms.
Graves is not an eligible petitioning creditor, because her claim
is the subject of a bona fide dispute as to liability and amount;
(2) Ms. Graves filed the Involuntary Petition in bad faith; and (3)
Ms. Graves has failed in sustaining her burden of proof to show
that Quinto & Wilks was not paying its debts as they became due.

Although Judge Kenney did not find that Ms. Graves filed the
petition in bad faith, he agreed with Quintos & Wilks that Ms
Graves' claim is the subject of a bona fide dispute as to liability
and amount, and that Ms. Graves has not met her burden to show that
Quintos and Wilks was not paying its debts as they became due.

A copy of the May 29, 2015 ruling is available at
http://is.gd/7Bo5M9from Leagle.com.

Kevin M. O'Donnell, Esquire -- kmo@henrylaw.com -- Henry &
O'Donnell, P.C., Alexandria, VA, Counsel for Chapter 7 Debtor.

Timothy Wayne Graves, Esquire, A Attorney LLC, Manassas, VA,
Counsel for Petitioning Creditor.


REMAN INDUSTRIES: Case Summary & 14 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Reman Industries, Inc.
        951 Fargo Avenue
        Elk Grove Village, IL 60007
Case No.: 15-23093

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Illinois (Chicago)

Judge: Hon. Carol A. Doyle

Debtor's Counsel: Joel A Schechter, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES OF JOEL A. SCHECHTER
                  53 W Jackson Blvd Ste 1522
                  Chicago, IL 60604
                  Tel: 312 332-0267
                  Fax: 312 939-4714
                  Email: joelschechter@covad.net

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Jeffrey E. Shawaluk, president.

A list of the Debtor's 14 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb15-23093.pdf


RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: Bid to Junk RFC's Suit vs. MortgageIT Denied
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Residential Funding Company, LLC, served its original Complaint on
DB Structured Products, Inc., on December 16, 2013.  At that time,
MortgageIT, Inc., was not named as a defendant.  In its original
Complaint, RFC alleged that it purchased loans from MortgageIT
pursuant to a contract and that DBSP was liable for MortgageIT's
breaches of that contract.  RFC filed its First Amended Complaint
to name MortgageIT as a defendant for the first time and allege
that MortgageIT was liable for its own breaches of warranties and
representations about the condition of the loans it sold to RFC,
which representations and warranties MortgageIT made in the
parties' contract.  In the First Amended Complaint, RFC added an
additional theory of recovery against DBSP, asserting that DBSP was
MortgageIT's alter ego.  On May 4, 2015, after the case had been
administratively consolidated with several other related cases into
this proceeding, RFC filed a Second Amended Complaint.

Judge Susan Richard Nelson of the United States District Court for
District of Minnesota denied the motion to dismiss the first
amended complaint, finding that the surviving portion of the motion
-- in which MortgageIT contends that claims based on breaches of
representations and warranties for loans sold prior to August 20,
2008 -- are barred by the statute of limitations.  Because RFC's
"continuing obligation" theory prevents the Court from concluding,
on the face of the pleadings alone, that the statute of limitations
bars all of RFC's claims for breaches of representations and
warranties for loans sold prior to August 20, 2008, the Court need
not consider the parties' other arguments, Judge Nelson said.

The case is In Re: RFC and RESCAP Liquidating Trust Litigation,
relating to Residential Funding Company, LLC v. DB Structured
Products, Inc., and MortgageIT, Inc., No. 14-cv-143 (ADM/TNL),
CIVIL FILE NO. 13-3451 (SRN/JJK/HB)(D. Minn.).

A full-text copy of Judge Nelson's Memorandum Opinion and Order
dated June 8, 2015, is available at http://is.gd/9JDOLufrom
Leagle.com.

Residential Funding Company, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Anthony
Alden -- anthonyalden@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, David Elsberg -- davidelsberg@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, David L Hashmall, Felhaber Larson,
Donald G Heeman, Felhaber Larson, Edward P Sheu --
esheu@bestlaw.com -- Best & Flanagan LLP, Erica P Taggart, Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Gabriel F Soledad --
gabrielsoledad@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, Isaac Nesser -- isaacnesser@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Jeffrey A Lipps, Carpenter Lipps &
Leland LLP, Jennifer A L Battle, Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP,
Johanna Ong -- johannaong@quinnemanuel.com  -- Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Marnie E Fearon, Felhaber Larson, Matthew
R Scheck -- matthewscheck@quinnemanuel.com  – Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, Peter E. Calamari --
petercalamari@quinnemanuel.com  -- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan LLP, Richard R Voelbel, Felhaber Larson, Ryan A Olson,
Felhaber Larson, Thomas G Garry -- tgarry@bestlaw.com  -- Best &
Flanagan LLP, Bradley T Smith, Felhaber Larson, Jessica J Nelson,
Felhaber Larson & Daniel R Kelly, Felhaber Larson.

ResCap Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff, represented by Anthony Alden,
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Bradley T Smith, Felhaber
Larson, David Elsberg, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, David
L Hashmall, Felhaber Larson, Donald G Heeman, Felhaber Larson,
Erica P Taggart, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Gabriel F
Soledad, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Isaac Nesser, Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Jeffrey A Lipps, Carpenter Lipps &
Leland LLP, Jennifer A L Battle, Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP,
Johanna Ong, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Marnie E
Fearon, Felhaber Larson, Matthew R Scheck, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, Peter E. Calamari, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP,
Richard R Voelbel, Felhaber Larson, Ryan A Olson, Felhaber Larson,
Jessica J Nelson, Felhaber Larson & Daniel R. Kelly, Felhaber
Larson.

Academy Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, represented by David M
Souders -- souders@thewbkfirm.com -- Weiner Brodsky Kider PC,
Tessa K Somers -- somers@thewbkfirm.com -- Weiner Brodsky Kider
PC, Anthony Gabor, Oberman Thompson & Segal LLC & James L Forman
-- jforman@obermanthompson.com -- Oberman Thompson, LLC.

The Mortgage Outlet, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eldon J
Spencer, Jr -- espencer@losgs.com -- Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer,
Gale & Sayre, Ltd & Stacey L Drentlaw -- sdrentlaw@losgs.com --
Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd.

Ark-La-Tex Financial Services, LLC, Defendant, represented by Mark
J Carpenter -- mark@carpenter-law-firm.com -- Carpenter Law Firm
PLLC.

Cherry Creek Mortgage Co., Inc., Defendant, represented by Eldon J
Spencer, Jr, Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd, James M
Jorissen -- jjorissen@losgs.com -- Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale
& Sayre, Ltd & Stacey L Drentlaw, Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale
& Sayre, Ltd.

Guaranty Bank, Defendant, represented by Gregory A Bromen --
gbromen@nilanjohnson.com -- Nilan Johnson Lewis PA, Matthew S.
Vignali -- mvignali@bcblaw.net -- Beck Chaet Bamberger & Polksy SC
& Steven W Jelenchick -- sjelenchick@bcblaw.net -- Beck Chaet
Bamberger & Polsky SC.

First California Mortgage Company, Defendant, represented by
Andrew Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss
-- cmoss@hjlawfirm.com -- Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page
Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J Robert Keena --
jkeena@hjlawfirm.com -- Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Americash, Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld, American
Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC,
Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., Evans D
Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J Robert Keena,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American Mortgage Law
Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law Group.

Broadview Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Golden Empire Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, represented by Erin
Sindberg Porter -- esindbergporter@greeneespel.com -- Greene Espel
PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble -- jkimble@greeneespel.com -- Greene
Espel PLLP, Jenny Gassman Pines -- jgassman-pines@greeneespel.com
-- Greene Espel PLLP, Philip R. Stein -- pstein@bilzin.com --
Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona --
ssakona@bilzin.com -- Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Community West Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Christina
Rieck Loukas -- cloukas@winthrop.com -- Winthrop & Weinstine, PA,
Christopher A Camardello -- ccamardello@winthrop.com -- Winthrop &
Weinstine, PA, Jeffrey R Ansel -- jansel@winthrop.com -- Winthrop
& Weinstine, PA & Michael A Rosow -- mrosow@winthrop.com --
Winthrop & Weinstine, PA.

Fremont Bank, Defendant, represented by Eldon J Spencer, Jr,
Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd, James M Jorissen,
Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd & Stacey L Drentlaw,
Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd.

First Equity Mortgage Bankers, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Amelia R Selvig -- aselvig@anthonyostlund.com -- Anthony Ostlund
Baer & Louwagie PA, Brooke D Anthony --
banthony@anthonyostlund.com -- Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA,
Joseph W Anthony -- janthony@anthonyostlund.com -- Anthony Ostlund
Baer & Louwagie PA, Philip R. Stein, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price &
Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price &
Axelrod LLP.

Colonial Savings, F.A., Defendant, represented by Daniel N Moak --
dmoak@briggs.com -- Briggs & Morgan, PA, Daniel J Supalla --
dsupalla@briggs.com -- Briggs & Morgan, PA & Mark G Schroeder --
mschroeder@briggs.com -- Briggs & Morgan, PA.

First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, represented by
Kevin J Dunlevy, Beisel & Dunlevy, PA & Michael E Kreun, Beisel &
Dunlevy, PA.

Central Pacific Homeloans, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Central Pacific Bank, Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J
Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American
Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law
Group.

Central Pacific Financial Corp., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Provident Funding Associates, L.P., Defendant, represented by
Daniel N Moak, Briggs & Morgan, PA, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs &
Morgan, PA, Mark G Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Neil R
O'Hanlon, Hogan Lovells US LLP.

First Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, represented by Gene A Hoff,
Minenko & Hoff & Michael J Minenko, Minenko & Hoff, P.A..

Mortgage Network, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Mortgage Capital Associates, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Amelia R Selvig, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Brooke D
Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Joseph W Anthony,
Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Philip R. Stein, Bilzin
Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona, Bilzin
Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Lenox Financial Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by Gina L
Albertson, Albertson Law & Michael D O'Neill, Martin & Squires,
P.A..

E Trade Bank, Defendant, represented by Amelia R Selvig, Anthony
Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer
& Louwagie PA, Joseph W Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie
PA, Philip R. Stein, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP &
Shalia M Sakona, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company, Defendant, represented by Amelia
R Selvig, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Amy Y Cho, Shook,
Hardy & Bacon LLP, Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer &
Louwagie PA & Michael P Conway, Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP.

PNC Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Adam M Gogolak,
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, Amanda Raines Lawrence,
BuckleySandler LLP, Brett J Natarelli, BuckleySandler LLP, Daniel
J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA, David A Schooler, Briggs & Morgan,
PA, Elaine P Golin, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, Fredrick S
Levin, BuckleySandler LLP, Jonathan M Moses, Wachtell, Lipton,
Rosen & Katz, Justin V Rodriguez, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz,
Mark G Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Richard E Gottlieb,
BuckleySandler LLP.

Mortgage Access Corp., Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J
Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American
Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law
Group.

Cornerstone Home Lending, Inc., Defendant, represented by Alan H
Maclin, Briggs & Morgan, PA, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA
& Mark G Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA.

Impac Funding Corporation, Defendant, represented by Erin Sindberg
Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP,
Katherine M. Swenson, Greene Espel PLLP & Janine Wetzel Kimble,
Greene Espel PLLP.

Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, represented by Amelia R
Selvig, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Brooke D Anthony,
Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA & Joseph W Anthony, Anthony
Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA.

Hometown Mortgage Services, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group & Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer &
Louwagie PA.

Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Amy L Schwartz, Lapp Libra Thomson Stoebner & Pusch, Chartered,
Jonathan M Jenkins, JENKINS KAYAYAN LLP, Lara Kayayan, Jenkins
LLP, Navdeep Singh, Jenkins Kayayan LLP & Richard T Thomson, Lapp
Libra Thomson Stoebner & Pusch, Chartered.

Wallick & Volk, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J
Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American
Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law
Group.

Branch Banking & Trust Co., Defendant, represented by Jason D
Evans, McGuire Woods LLP, Kelly G Laudon, Lindquist & Vennum PLLP,
Mark A Jacobson, Lindquist & Vennum PLLP, T Richmond McPherson,
III, McGuire Woods LLP & William C Mayberry, Mcguire Woods LLP.

T.J. Financial, Inc., Defendant, represented by Erin Sindberg
Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene Espel
PLLP, Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP, Philip R. Stein,
Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona, Bilzin
Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Stearns Lending, LLC, Defendant, represented by Alan H Maclin,
Briggs & Morgan, PA, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Mark
G Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA.

Terrace Mortgage Company, Defendant, represented by Aaron P M
Tady, Coles Barton LLP, C J Schoenwetter, Bowman & Brooke LLP,
John D Sear, Bowman & Brooke LLP, Thomas M Barton, Coles Barton
LLP & Rachelle A Velgersdyk, Bowman & Brooke LLP.

Gateway Bank, F.S.B., Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J
Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American
Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law
Group.

Universal American Mortgage Company, LLC, Defendant, represented
by Enza G Boderone, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, Erin
Sindberg Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene
Espel PLLP, Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP, Philip R.
Stein, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona,
Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Amy L Schwartz,
Lapp Libra Thomson Stoebner & Pusch, Chartered, Eric P Tuttle,
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Gregory D Phillips, Munger, Tolles &
Olson, LLP, Marc T G Dworsky, Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP, Michael
E Soloff, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Richard C St John, Munger
Tolles & Olson, Richard T Thomson, Lapp Libra Thomson Stoebner &
Pusch, Chartered, Thomas Jacob, Wells Fargo Law Department & Todd
J Rosen, Munger Tolles & Olson LLP.

BMO Harris Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Amanda Raines
Lawrence, BuckleySandler LLP, Brett J Natarelli, BuckleySandler
LLP, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA, David A Schooler,
Briggs & Morgan, PA, Fredrick S Levin, BuckleySandler LLP,
Kristopher Knabe, BuckleySandler LLP & Richard E Gottlieb,
BuckleySandler LLP.

Wells Fargo Financial Retail Credit, Inc., Defendant, represented
by Eric P Tuttle, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Gregory D Phillips,
Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP, Kristopher Knabe, BuckleySandler LLP,
Marc T G Dworsky, Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP, Michael E Soloff,
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Richard C St John, Munger Tolles &
Olson, Richard T Thomson, Lapp Libra Thomson Stoebner & Pusch,
Chartered, Thomas Jacob, Wells Fargo Law Department, Todd J Rosen,
Munger Tolles & Olson LLP & Amy L Schwartz, Lapp Libra Thomson
Stoebner & Pusch, Chartered.

Standard Pacific Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, represented by Enza G
Boderone, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, Erin Sindberg
Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene Espel
PLLP, Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP, Philip R. Stein,
Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona, Bilzin
Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

National Bank of Kansas City, Defendant, represented by Nancy A
Temple, Katten & Temple LLP, Scott N Gilbert, Katten & Temple LLP
& Seth J S Leventhal, LEVENTHAL pllc.

iServe Residential Lending, LLC, Defendant, represented by Erin
Sindberg Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene
Espel PLLP, Jeanette M. Bazis, Greene Espel PLLP, Peter L Loh,
Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP & Randy D Gordon, Gardere Wynne Sewell
LLP.

Circle Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by Sharon Robin
Markowitz, Stinson Leonard Street LLP, Todd A Noteboom, Stinson
Leonard Street LLP, W Anders Folk, Stinson Leonard Street LLP &
Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA.

United Fidelity Funding Corp, Defendant, represented by Michael J
Steinlage, Larson King, LLP.

DB Structured Products, Inc., Defendant, represented by Danielle
Kantor, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, David J Woll, Simpson
Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Isaac M Rethy, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
LLP, Jonathan Nussbaum, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, William A
McNab, Winthrop & Weinstine, PA & William T Russell, Jr, Simpson
Thacher & Bartlett LLP.

MortgageIT, Inc., Defendant, represented by David J Woll, Simpson
Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Isaac M Rethy, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
LLP & William A McNab, Winthrop & Weinstine, PA.

CTX Mortgage Company, LLC, Defendant, represented by Benjamin E
Gurstelle, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Paul J Hemming, Briggs & Morgan,
PA. Pulte Homes, Inc., Defendant, represented by Benjamin E
Gurstelle, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Paul J Hemming, Briggs & Morgan,
PA. PulteGroup, Inc., Defendant, represented by Benjamin E
Gurstelle, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Paul J Hemming, Briggs & Morgan,
PA.

Home Loan Center, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V
Valinoti, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody,
American Mortgage Law Group.

Decision One Mortgage Company, LLC, Defendant, represented by Beth
A Stewart, Williams & Connolly LLP, Daniel J Millea, Zelle Hofmann
Voelbel & Mason LLP, Elizabeth V Kniffen, Zelle Hofmann Voelbel &
Mason LLP, Jesse T Smallwood, Williams & Connolly LLP, Matthew V
Johnson, Williams & Connolly LLP, Noorudin Mahmood Ahmad, Williams
& Connolly LLP & R. Hackney Wiegmann, Williams & Connolly LLP.

HSBC Finance Corporation, Defendant, represented by David J
Stagman, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Gregory S Korman, Katten
Muchin Rosenman LLP, Nicole M Moen, Fredrikson & Byron, PA, Stuart
M Richter, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP & Todd A Wind, Fredrikson &
Byron, PA.

E-Loan, Inc., Defendant, represented by Sharda R Kneen, Lindquist
& Vennum PLLP, Terrence J Fleming, Lindquist & Vennum PLLP &
Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA.

Rescue Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, represented by Christopher R
Morris, Bassford Remele, PA, Daniel R Olson, Bassford Remele, PA,
Jeffrey D. Klobucar, Bassford Remele, PA & Mark D Covin, Bassford
Remele, PA.

RBC Mortgage Company, Defendant, represented by Amanda Raines
Lawrence, BuckleySandler LLP, Brian Wegrzyn, BuckleySandler LLP,
Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA, David A Schooler, Briggs &
Morgan, PA & Matthew P Previn, BuckleySandler LLP.

CMG Mortgage, Inc, Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Synovus Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by Brent D Hitson,
Burr & Forman LLP, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA, Mark G
Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Victor L Hayslip, Burr & Forman
LLP.

Honor Bank, Defendant, represented by Garth G Gavenda, Anastasi
Jellum, PA, Lindsay W Cremona, Anastasi Jellum, P.A., Susan Jill
Rice, Alward Fisher Rice Rowe & Graf, PLC & T Christopher Stewart,
Anastasi Jellum, PA.

Primary Capital Advisors LLC, Defendant, represented by Daniel J
Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA, John O'Shea Sullivan, Burr & Forman
LLP, Mark G Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Tala Amirfazli, Burr
& Forman LLP.
PHH Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by David T Schultz,
Maslon LLP, David M Souders, Weiner Brodsky Kider PC, Nicole E
Narotzky, Maslon LLP & Tessa K Somers, Weiner Brodsky Kider PC.

Global Advisory Group, Inc., Defendant, represented by Lance T
Bonner, Lindquist & Vennum PLLP.

Freedom Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, represented by Enza G
Boderone, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, Erin Sindberg
Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene Espel
PLLP, Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP & Philip R. Stein,
Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Monarch Bank, Defendant, represented by Beth A Jenson Prouty,
Bassford Remele, PA.

First Mariner Bank, Defendant, represented by Joel L Perrell, Jr.,
Miles & Stockbridge P.C., Michael E Blumenfeld, Miles &Stockbridge
P.C., Nicole M Moen, Fredrikson & Byron, PA, Timothy M Hurley,
Miles & Stockbridge P.C. & Todd A Wind, Fredrikson & Byron, PA.

Equifirst Corporation, Defendant, represented by Jennifer L Olson,
Stinson Leonard Street LLP, Joshua J Fritsch, Sullivan & Cromwell
LLP & Todd A Noteboom, Stinson Leonard Street LLP.

EFC Holdings Corporation, Defendant, represented by Jennifer L
Olson, Stinson Leonard Street LLP, Joshua J Fritsch, Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP & Todd A Noteboom, Stinson Leonard Street LLP.

Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc., Counter Claimant,
represented by Navdeep Singh, Jenkins Kayayan LLP.

Residential Funding Corporation filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York on May 14, 2012.  The Bankruptcy Court
confirmed the Chapter 11 Plan on December 11, 2013, and the Plan
became effective on December 17, 2013.


ROSSCO HOLDINGS: 5th Cir. Affirms Dismissal of Malpractice Case
---------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed
the district court's judgment of dismissal and denied the motion
for remand in the case captioned ROSSCO HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, a
California corporation; LEONARD M. ROSS, an Individual, and as
Trustee of the Leonard M. Ross Revocable Trust (u/t/d 12-20-85),
Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MICHAEL MCCONNELL, Esq.; KELLY HART &
HALLMAN, L.L.P.; BEARD KULTGEN BROPHY BOSTWICK & DICKSON, L.L.P.,
Defendants-Appellees, NO. 14-10900 (5th Cir.).

Rossco Holdings, Incorporated and Leonard M. Ross appealed the
district court's dismissal of their negligent misrepresentation and
malpractice claims against the Defendants. The district court held
that because Plaintiffs' confirmed Chapter 11 bankruptcy plans did
not specifically and unequivocally reserve the claims that
Plaintiffs sought to pursue, Plaintiffs lacked standing to bring
them. Plaintiffs argued that the district court lacked jurisdiction
to interpret their confirmed plans in the manner that it did and
that it should have looked to Ninth Circuit precedent to interpret
the plans.

Plaintiffs also moved for remand so that the district court may
reconsider its dismissal in light of a recent order by the
bankruptcy court that confirmed their plans.

The 5th Circuit agreed with the district court. It also held that
Plaintiffs raised no serious argument that the district court
lacked jurisdiction to interpret their confirmed plans. It likewise
did not consider Plaintiffs' Ninth Circuit argument because
Plaintiffs failed to raise the argument before the district court,
and thus, the argument was deemed waived.

Finally, the 5th Circuit denied the Plaintiffs' motion for remand
because neither of Plaintiffs' confirmed plans were modified and
Plaintiffs have not shown how the California bankruptcy court's
recent order changes the application of law.

A copy of the June 1, 2015 decision is available at
http://is.gd/7l19skfrom Leagle.com.

College Station, Texas-based Rossco Holdings, Inc., filed for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 10-60953) on
Aug. 2, 2010.  The case was later transferred to the Central
District of California, Los Angeles Division.  The new California
Case No. of Rossco Holdings is LA10-55951BB.  David J Richardson,
Esq., and Laura L Buchanan, Esq., at The Creditors' Law Group,
represented the Debtor as counsel.  The Debtor disclosed
$28,415,681 in assets and $10,567,302 in liabilities as of the
Petition Date.

Affiliates Monte Nido Estates, LLC; LJR Properties, Ltd.; WM
Properties, Ltd.; Colony Lodging, Inc.; and Rossco Plaza, Inc.,
filed separate Chapter 11 petitions.

The Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California in
March 2013 entered a final decree closing the Chapter 11 cases of
Rossco Holdings, Inc., et al., after confirming the Debtors'
Modified First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization.


SAMUEL MORREALE: Conversion to Chapter 7 Affirmed
-------------------------------------------------
District Judge William J. Martinez affirmed the judgment of the
Bankruptcy Court in the case captioned IN RE: SAMUEL JESSE
CHRISTIAN MORREALE, Appellant, v. 2011-SIP-1 CRE/CADC VENTURE, LLC,
and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Appellees, CIVIL ACTION NO.
15-CV-0008-WJM, (D. Colo.).

Semuel Jesse Morreale appealed the Bankruptcy Court's decision to
convert his Chapter 11 proceeding to a Chapter 7 proceeding. The
Bankruptcy Court had sustained the United States Trustee's motion
to convert Morreale's Chapter 11 proceeding to a Chapter 7
proceeding based on two grounds: (a) substantial or continuing loss
to or diminution of the estate and the absence of a reasonable
likelihood of rehabilitation; and (b) failure to timely pay taxes
owed after the date of the order for relief or to file tax returns
due after the date of the order for relief.

Judge Martinez affirmed the Bankruptcy Court's finding that the
$150,000 in attorney's fees that Morreale incurred for roughly 14
months of proceedings in "a non-operating Chapter 11" are
"substantial administrative expenses" sufficient to satisfy the
"substantial or continuing loss to or diminution of the estate"
element.  He also agreed with the Bankruptcy Court's conclusion
that Morreale's Plan was a liquidating plan, not a rehabilitation
plan, and therefore no reasonable likelihood of rehabilitation
existed.

Judge Martinez no longer found the need to reach Morreale's
arguments regarding the unusual circumstances exception for his
failure to pay taxes.

A copy of the June 1, 2015 order is available at
http://is.gd/fbglzbfrom Leagle.com.

Samuel Jesse Christian Morreale, Appellant, represented by Jeffrey
A. Weinman, Weinman & Associates, PC, Matthew M. Wolf -–
mwolf@allen-vellone.com -- Allen & Vellone, P.C. & Patrick D.
Vellone -- pvellone@allen-vellone.com -- Allen & Vellone, P.C..

2011-SIP-1 CRE/CADC Venture, LLC, Appellee, represented by Craig K.
Schuenemann, Bryan Cave LLP-Denver.

United States Trustee, Appellee, represented by Daniel James Morse,
U.S. Trustee's Office.

Tom H Connolly, Trustee, represented by Tom Harvey Connolly,
Connolly, Rosania & Lofstedt, PC.

Samuel Morreale filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Colo. Case
No. 13-27310) on October 15, 2013.


SAPPHIRE DEVELOPMENT: Case Dismissed for "Bad Faith" Filing
-----------------------------------------------------------
Connecticut Bankruptcy Judge Alan H.W. Shiff granted the request of
Robert McKay, the largest unsecured creditor of debtor Sapphire
Development, LLC, to dismiss the debtor's Chapter 11 case to allow
McKay to pursue a state court action that was stayed by the
bankruptcy case.  

McKay argues that the bankruptcy case was filed in bad faith.

In 1996, McKay obtained a $3.96 million judgment in his favor from
a New York state court.  The judgment was based on a finding of
actual fraud committed by Stuart Longman against McKay, which the
state court described as gross, wanton, and willful.

In September 2010, McKay commenced an action against Longman,
Sapphire and others in the superior court of the state of
Connecticut "to recover his judgment against Longman from Sapphire,
by reaching Sapphire's sole asset, a 25.237-acre parcel of real
property located in Ridgefield, Connecticut.  The State Court
Action was assigned to the Complex Litigation Docket and scheduled
for trial on January 14, 2013.  The trial was stayed three days
before it was to commence when, on January 11, 2013, Sapphire filed
for Chapter 11 case.

On January 15, 2013, McKay filed a Motion to Dismiss or, in the
alternative, to abstain pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 305(a). On
January 23, 2013, McKay filed an amended Motion for Relief from
Stay to proceed with the State Court Action.  On June 19 and 20,
and July 24, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court held hearings on McKay's
abstention motion.  On September 30, 2013, the Court granted
McKay's Motion to Abstain.  

Sapphire appealed.

On November 5, 2014, the District Court agreed with the Bankruptcy
Court's findings, but concluded abstention under Sec. 305(a) was
not an appropriate remedy in the context of those findings. The
District Court vacated the Abstention Order and remanded the case
for further proceedings.

On December 16, 2014, the Bankruptcy Court conducted a status
conference on McKay's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Relief from
Stay.

Notwithstanding the District Court's determination that McKay is a
creditor in this case, and even if he was not, he has standing as a
"party in interest", Sapphire, Longman, and Hudson City Savings
Bank nonetheless urged the Bankruptcy Court to proceed with
Sapphire's adversary proceeding, Adv. Pro. No. 13-5024, which seeks
a declaration providing: (A) that McKay does not possess a bona
fide claim against Sapphire, and therefore, is not entitled to
relief against the Debtor for any purpose, is not entitled to vote
in or otherwise recover against the Debtor or its assets in the
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy case and otherwise lacks standing in this
Case; and (B) that the Hudson City Mortgage is a valid first
priority mortgage on the Property.

Sapphire also requested that the Court address its proposed plan of
reorganization. McKay countered with a request that the Court grant
his Motion to Dismiss on the basis of the evidence presented at the
trial on his Motion to Abstain.

The Bankruptcy Court commenced trial on the Motion to Dismiss on
April 14, 2015.

A copy of Judge Shiff's Memorandum of Decision and Order dated June
26 on Motion to Dismiss is available at http://is.gd/H8Xsxpfrom
Leagle.com.

The case is Sapphire Development LLC v. McKay (In re Sapphire
Development LLC), 13-01680, U.S. District Court, District of
Connecticut (Hartford).

The Debtors are represented by:

     Randolph E. White, Esq.
     David Y. Wolnerman, Esq.
     WHITE & WOLNERMAN, PLLC
     950 Third Avenue, 11th Floor
     New York, NY 10022
     Tel: (212) 308-0667
     Fax: (212) 308-7090
     E-mail: rwhite@wwlawgroup.com
             dwolnerman@wwlawgroup.com

Robert McKay is represented by:

     James R. Fogarty, Esq.
     FOGARTY COHEN SELBY & NEMIROFF, LLC
     1700 East Putnam Avenue, Suite 406
     Old Greenwich, CT 06870
     Tel: 203-661-1000
     Fax: 203-629-7300

Hudson City Savings Bank is represented by:

     David K. Fiveson, Esq.
     BUTLER, FITZGERALD, FIVESON & MCCARTHY
     9 E 45th St
     New York, NY 10017
     Tel: (212) 615-2200
     Fax: (212) 615-2215
     E-mail: dfiveson@bffmlaw.com

Stuart Longman is represented by:

     Gary S. Klein, Esq.
     CARMODY TORRANCE SANDAK & HENNESSEY LLP
     707 Summer Street, Suite 300
     Stamford, CT 06901
     Tel: 203.252.2696
     Fax: 203.325.8608
     E-mail: gklein@carmodylaw.com


SHASTA ENTERPRISES: General Partners Directed to File Schedules
---------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California
directed Antonio Rodriguez, Jr. and Lorraine Rodriguez, general
partners of Shasta Enterprises, to file by July 10, 2015, a
statement of their assets and liabilities.

According to a civil minutes, the general partners of the Debtor
will prepare and file the list required under subdivision (a) the
schedules of the assets and liabilities, the schedule of current
income and expenditures, the schedule of executory contracts and
unexpired leases, and statement of financial affairs of the
partnership.  

Hank Spacone, the Chapter 11 trustee, said that it needed the
personal asset and liability information from the Debtor's general
partners in order to prepare a disclosure statement and formulate a
plan of reorganization for the Debtor.  The trustee's preliminary
analysis of the estate's assets and liabilities reveals that the
allowed unsecured claims against the estate (likely to exceed $5
million) cannot be paid in full solely from the liquidation of the
estate's assets.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on June 25, 2015,
according to the Trustee, if it is determined that there are
insufficient assets to pay the Debtor's creditors in full,
disclosure of the general partners' assets and liabilities is
necessary to determine the minimum amount creditors would receive
in a chapter 7 liquidation of the Debtor Shasta Enterprises for
purposes of evaluating possible Chapter 11 plans of
reorganization.

The Trustee intends to file a Plan and Disclosure Statement by the
end of July 2015.

                     About Shasta Enterprises

Redding, California-based Shasta Enterprises, dba Vidal Vineyards,
dba Silverado Knolls, dba Villa Vidal Vineyards, sought bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 14-30833) on Oct. 31, 2014.
The petition was signed by Antonio Rodriguez, general partner.

Judge Michael S. McManus presides over the case.  The Debtor's
counsel is David M. Brady, Esq., at Law Office of Cowan & Brady,
in
Redding, California.

The Debtor listed total assets of $33.42 million and total debts
of
$21.49 million.  

The Court, on Dec. 29, 2014, approved the appointment of Hank
Spacone as the Chapter 11 trustee of the Debtor's estate.



SHASTA ENTERPRISES: Hearing on Stay Relief Continued Until Sept. 8
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Michael S. McManus of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of California continued until Sept. 8, 2015, at
10:00 a.m., the hearing to consider creditor Redding Bank of
Commerce's motion for relief from the automatic stay relating to
Shasta Enterprises' property.

Redding Bank sought relief from stay as to the Debtor's property at
355 Hemsted Drive Redding, California.

The time prior to the hearing will enable Hank Spacone, the Chapter
11 trustee, to evaluate and respond to the motion.

                     About Shasta Enterprises

Redding, California-based Shasta Enterprises, dba Vidal Vineyards,
dba Silverado Knolls, dba Villa Vidal Vineyards, sought bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 14-30833) on Oct. 31, 2014.
The petition was signed by Antonio Rodriguez, general partner.

Judge Michael S. McManus presides over the case.  The Debtor's
counsel is David M. Brady, Esq., at Law Office of Cowan & Brady, in
Redding, California.

The Debtor listed total assets of $33.42 million and total debts of
$21.49 million.  

The Court, on Dec. 29, 2014, approved the appointment of Hank
Spacone as the Chapter 11 trustee of the Debtor's estate.



SHERSON GROUP: Seeks U.S. Recognition of Canadian Case
------------------------------------------------------
Sherson Group Inc., distributor of the Nine West footwear in 48
retail locations, filed a Chapter 15 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-11765) on July 6, 2015, in Manhattan, to seek
recognition of its Canadian proceedings.

The U.S. case is assigned to Judge Sean H. Lane.  Michael B.
Schaedle, Esq., at Blank Rome LLP, in Philadelphia, serves as U.S.
counsel to the Debtor.

Aird & Berlis has been retained by Sherson Group to represent the
Company as its primary counsel in its Canadian proceeding under the
Canadian Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3.

Richter Advisory Group Inc. was selected by the Company as trustee.
Richter, as foreign representative, signed the Chapter 15
petition.

Sherson Group is one of Canada's premier distributors and retailers
of footwear and accessories.  Its fashion portfolio features names
such as Nine West, Bandolino, Enzo Angiolini, Anne Klein, Easy
Spirit, Adrienne Vittadini, Adrianna Papell, Taryn Rose, Flogg,
Charles David, Circa Joan and David, and Mootsies Tootsies.

The Company's primary brand is Nine West and distribution occurs
primarily through its 48 retail locations in Canada (although a
substantial percentage of sales occur through wholesale and
E-commerce channels).  It employs in excess of 600 workers
throughout Canada.

The Company was established in 1984 as Sherson Marketing Inc.,
which later became Sherson Marketing Corp. and, subsequently
amalgamated with another entity to become Sherson Group.  It is
organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario with a
registered address 1446 Don Mills Road, Suite 100, Toronto,
Ontario, Canada.

                           Debt Facility

The Debtor has a $13 million revolving loan facility with Bank of
Montreal ("BOM"), which is secured by a first-ranking security
interest in the Debtor's property, including, without limitation,
accounts and inventory, and is evidenced by a certain Credit
Agreement, dated Jan. 18, 2013.  As of the Canadian Commencement
Date, the Debtor was obligated to BOM in respect of the BOM
Revolver in the approximate amount of $4.8 million, however, there
is currently limited additional availability based on the
applicable borrowing base and reserves.

The Company also has a secured term loan with Bank of Montreal with
remaining indebtedness owed in the approximate amount of $780,000.

The Debtor is also obligated on a $3 million term loan facility
from BDC Capital, Inc., which is secured by a general security
interest in the Debtor's property subordinate by its terms to the
BOM Revolver, and is evidenced by a certain Letter of Offer, dated
Jan. 11, 2013.  As of the Canadian Commencement Date, the Debtor
was obligated to BDC in respect of the BDC Term Loan in the
approximate amount of $3 million.

One of the Company's most significant assets is the License
Agreement, under which it is maintains the exclusive license to
distribute and sell products in Canada for various Nine West
brands.  The counterparties to the License Agreement are U.S.
entities and the agreement is governed by New York law.  The
Company is indebted to the Licensors in excess of $19 million under
the License Agreement, making them by far the Company's largest
creditor.  Excluding the Licensors' claim, the Company owes
approximately $1.5 million to unsecured creditors.

                        Canadian Proceeding

On June 29, 2015, the Company filed a Notice of Intention to Make a
Proposal under Canadian Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. B-3.  The Notice of Intention establishes the Company's ability
under the BIA to negotiate a proposal with its secured creditors
and other major stakeholders and present that proposal for a vote
by its unsecured creditors. The Notice of Intention also indicates
that Trustee has been selected by the Company as proposal trustee.

Pursuant to the certain Order dated June 30, 2015, Richter is
authorized by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice to act as the
Company's foreign representative and specifically authorized to
request the relief sought in the Verified Petition.  Also on June
30, 2015, the Superintendent issued a Certificate of Filing of a
Notice of Intention to Make a Proposal, which certifies the
acceptance of the Notice of Intention.

                   Challenges, Market Conditions

Sam Babe, Esq., at Aird & Berlis, explains that the Company has
faced certain challenges associated with market conditions (both as
to its core products and currency volatility) and the unsuccessful
implementation of a growth strategy developed with the Licensors in
connection with the License Agreement.  This has led to a liquidity
crisis and resulting covenant defaults in connection with the BOM
Revolver and defaults under the License Agreement.  

The Company, in conjunction with its consultants, will be
developing a comprehensive restructuring proposal to address
underperforming stores, right size the Company's overhead, clear
excess inventory positions and address the payable to the
Licensors, liquidity constraints and senior and second lien lender
defaults.

The Proposal, which will require concessions and cooperation from
the Company's creditors, will enable a restructuring that will
value maximize for all Company creditors, including the Licensors.

A copy of Sam Babe's declaration is available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Sherson_Ch15_Prov_Relief.pdf

A copy of Richter's motion for provisional relief in the form of an
order to show cause with a temporary restraining order

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Sherson_Ch15_Declaration.pdf



SHOWBOAT CAR WASH: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Showboat Car Wash Limited Partnership
        1636 South 3rd Street
        Jacksonville Beach, FL 32250

Case No.: 15-03031

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida (Jacksonville)

Debtor's Counsel: Brett A Mearkle, Esq.
                  MEARKLE TRUEBLOOD ADAM, PL
                  218 N. Broad Street
                  Jacksonville, FL 32202
                  Tel: 904-352-1342
                  Fax: 904-800-1058
                  Email: bmearkle@mtalawyers.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by David Danzeisen, general partner.

The Debtor did not include a list of its largest unsecured
creditors when it filed the petition.


SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL: Asks Judge to Approve Auction Date
-------------------------------------------------------
Katy Stech, writing for Dow Jones' Daily Bankruptcy Review,
reported that Spectrum Analytical Inc. officials are preparing to
sell the Massachusetts-based environmental testing lab's operations
at a July 29 bankruptcy auction.

According to the report, in court papers, Spectrum Analytical
officials asked a judge to set a July 24 bid deadline for buyers
who want to challenge a $5 million offer in hand from Eurofins
Scientific Inc., a Brussels-based life science company.

                       About Spectrum Analytical

Spectrum Analytical Inc. provides testing and analytical data for
environmental interests.  Hanibal Technology LLC serves as
Spectrum's exclusive international marketing and sales agent, and
focuses on education, research, and development in environmental
technology.  Spectrum maintains offices in Agawam, Massachusetts,
Tampa, Florida, North Kingstown, Rhode Island, and Syracuse, New
York.

Spectrum Analytical and Hanibal Technology commenced Chapter 11
bankruptcy cases (Bankr. D. Mass. Case Nos. 15-30404 and 15-30405)
on April 30, 2015, to retake management of their business and
assets from the receiver installed by their lender.  Hanibal
Tayeh,
the sole member, signed the bankruptcy petitions.

Spectrum disclosed $8,658,751 in assets and $1,987,714 in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.  Hanibal estimated less
than $10 million in assets and debt.

Bacon Wilson, P.C., serves as the Debtors' counsel.


STANDARD REGISTER: Former Workers' Summary Judgment Bids Denied
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge J. Michael Seabright of the United States District Court for
District of Hawaii denied motions for summary judgment in the case
filed by Standard Register Company and WorkflowOne LLC against
their former employees Lynden Keala, Jaxcine Kaulili-Guzon, and
Sharon Brown-Henry, as well as against the Individual Defendants'
current employer, American Business Forms, Inc., dba American
Solutions for Business, based on diversity of citizenship under 28
U.S.C. Section 1332.

The Plaintiffs allege that the Individual Defendants violated
non-solicitation and/or non-disclosure provisions of their
employment agreements when, after leaving to work for ASB, they
solicited and/or accepted business from the Plaintiffs' clients
and/or disclosed trade secrets.  The Amended Complaint makes claims
against the Individual Defendants for breach of contract, and
against all the Defendants for misappropriation of trade secrets
and tortious interference with business relations.  WorkflowOne's
business is "providing print, print-related, and promotional
marketing solutions, including print and promotional marketing and
distribution of promotional products."  ASB is a competitor of
WorkflowOne in the same business.

Judge Seabright denied the Defendants' motions for summary judgment
as to the consideration issue.  Any other aspects of the Motions,
if appropriate, may be raised in subsequent motions after
sufficient discovery is completed in compliance with the previous
Scheduling Order, Judge Seabright ruled.  Further, the Plaintiffs
are directed to notify the Court and the Defendants regarding their
position as to further injunctive relief (given that the covenants
at issue appear to be restricted to one year after an individual
leaves WorkflowOne).  The parties are also directed to contact
Magistrate Judge Puglisi to establish new dates and deadlines for
the remaining aspects of the litigation.

The case is THE STANDARD REGISTER COMPANY, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v.
LYNDEN KEALA, ET AL., Defendants, CIV. NO. 14-00291 JMS-RLP (D.
Haw.).

A full-text copy of Judge Seabright's Order dated June 8, 2015, is
available at http://is.gd/xEpKiffrom Leagle.com.

Jason W. Hilliard, Esq. -- jason.hilliard@dinsmore.com -- and Ryan
W. Green, Esq. -- ryan.green@dinsmore.com -- of Dinsmore & Shohl
and James H. Hershey, Esq. -- jhh@fmhc-law.com -- of Fukunaga
Matayoshi Hershey Ching & Kop serve as counsel for Plaintiff The
Standard Register Company.

Richard M. Rand, Esq. -- rrand@marrjones.com -- of Marr Jones &
Wang LLLP serves as counsel for Defendant Lynden Keala.

                     About Standard Register

Standard Register provides market-specific insights and a
compelling portfolio of workflow, content and analytics solutions
to address the changing business landscape in healthcare, financial
services, manufacturing and retail markets.  The Company has
operations in all U.S. states and Puerto Rico, and currently
employs 3,500 full-time employees and 16 part-time employees.

The Standard Register Company and 10 affiliated debtors sought
Chapter 11 protection in Delaware on March 12, 2015, with plans to
launch a sale process where its largest secured lender would serve
as stalking horse bidder in an auction.

The cases are pending before the Honorable Judge Brendan L.
Shannon
and are jointly administered under Case No. 15-10541.

The Debtors have tapped Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP as counsel; McKinsey Recovery &
Transformation Services U.S., LLC, as restructuring advisors; and
Prime Clerk LLC as claims agent.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors tapped Lowenstein
Sandler LLP as its counsel and Jefferies LLC as its exclusive
investment banker.


SYNTAX-BRILLIAN: 3rd Cir. Revives Sanctions Bid v. Greenberg
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit revived a dispute
between a former investor and shareholder of defunct TV set maker,
Syntax Brillian Corporation, and Greenberg Taurig, LLP, SBC's
lawyers during its bankruptcy proceedings.

SBC was a public company engaged in the manufacture and
distribution of high-definition televisions under the "Olevia"
brand name.  In July 2008, SBC filed a petition for Chapter 11
bankruptcy in Delaware.  SBC sought the Bankruptcy Court's approval
of a proposed sale of SBC's assets.  Greenberg Taurig's Nancy A.
Mitchell handled the case primarily.

Ahmed Amr opposed the sale of SBC's assets on grounds that SBC's
management and business partners had engaged in fraud and
misconduct. Over Amr's objections, the Bankruptcy Court allowed the
sale to proceed. On July 6, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court entered an
"Order Confirming Debtors' Second Amended Chapter 11 Liquidating
Plan, as Modified." The Plan became effective on July 7, 2009.

On December 20, 2011, over two years after GT ceased performing in
its role as counsel to SBC, Amr filed in the Bankruptcy Court a
motion for sanctions against GT and Attorney Mitchell. He also
filed a motion to compel the release of certain documents. On March
2, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court denied both motions. Amr then
proceeded to file a series of motions for reconsideration or
amendment of those orders. On January 14, 2013, the Bankruptcy
Court entered an order denying Amr's first, second, and third
motions to alter or amend.

Amr appealed from that decision to the District Court for the
District of Delaware.  GT and Attorney Mitchell filed a joint
motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely under Rule 8002 of the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. On January 12, 2015, the
District Court entered an order granting the motion to dismiss.

The Bankruptcy Court entered its order denying Amr's motions for
reconsideration on January 14, 2013. Thus, Amr had until January
28, 2013 to file his appeal of that decision.

GT and Attorney Mitchell argued in their motion to dismiss that
Amr's appeal was untimely because it had been filed one day late --
on January 29, 2013. They pointed to the fact that the notice had
been stamped by the Clerk on January 29, 2013, and that the
Bankruptcy Court's docket reflected the same.  Amr countered that
his appeal was, in fact, timely. Presenting a United States Postal
Service tracking sheet, Amr argued that his appeal had been timely
received by the Bankruptcy Court (on January 28th at 11:42 a.m.),
but that it was incorrectly docketed late. The District Court
granted the motion to dismiss over Amr's objections but did not
specifically address Amr's argument that the Clerk had erred in
docketing his appeal.

In reviving the case, the Fourth Circuit held that Amr has offered
credible evidence showing that his notice was actually received
into the custody of the Bankruptcy Clerk on January 28, 2013, one
day before it was stamped as filed.  The Fourth Circuit expressed
no opinion as to the merits of Amr's appeal from the Bankruptcy
Court's order.

A copy of the Third Circuit's Opinion dated June 26 is available at
http://is.gd/EhO7Y8from Leagle.com.

                       About Syntax-Brillian

Based in Tempe, Arizona, Syntax-Brillian Corporation manufactured
and marketed LCD HDTVs, digital cameras, and consumer electronics
products including Olevia(TM) brand high-definition widescreen LCD
televisions and Vivitar brand digital still and video cameras.
Syntax-Brillian was the sole shareholder of California-based
Vivitar Corporation.

The Company and two of its affiliates -- Syntax-Brillian SPE,
Inc., and Syntax Groups Corp. -- filed for Chapter 11 protection
on July 8, 2008 (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.08-11407.  Lawyers at
Greenberg Traurig LLP represented the Debtors as counsel.  Five
members composed the official committee of unsecured creditors.
Pepper Hamilton, LLP, represented the Committee as counsel.  Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC, served as the Debtors' balloting,
notice, and claims agent.  When the Debtors filed for protection
against their creditors, they disclosed total assets of
$175,714,000 and total debts of $259,389,000.

The Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Debtors' Joint Chapter 11
Liquidation Plan in an order dated July 6, 2009.  Under the Plan,
general unsecured claims were to received pro rata distributions
from a liquidating trust after payment of the trust's expenses and
a "liquidating trust funding reimbursement."  Holders of allowed
prepetition credit facility claims were to receive their pro rata
distributions from a lender trust, after payment in full of
allowed DIP facility claims.  A full-text copy of the Debtors' 2nd
amended Chapter 11 liquidating plan is available at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/syntax-brillian2ndamendedplan.pdf

The SB Liquidation Trust is represented by David M. Fournier,
Esq., and Evelyn J. Meltzer, Esq., at Pepper Hamilton LLP; and
Allan B. Diamond, Esq., Andrea L. Kim, Esq., Eric D. Madden, Esq.,
and Michael J. Yoder, Esq., at Diamond McCarthy LLP.


VAUGHAN CO: Becker, and Merrie Chappell Firms Withdraw as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar granted the Motions for
Permission to Withdraw Appearance that were filed in the case
captioned JUDITH A. WAGNER, Chapter 11 Trustee of the bankruptcy
estate of the Vaughan Company, Realtors, Plaintiff, v. SAID BANDI
a/k/a SAID ALAGHE BANDI, individually, SAID BANDA d/b/a Bandi
Engineering, BANDI ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., ADF FINANCIAL, INC.,
SHAHLA BANDI a/k/a SHAHLA ZOLFAGHARI, MARYAM ALAGHE-BANDI, HAMID
ALAGHE BANDI, HOSSEIN ALAGHE BANDI, ABDUL DABIRI, SHARAREH SHAHIN,
And NEW MEXICO ACCOUNTING SPECIALISTS, INC., Defendants, CASE NOS.
12-CV-00817-WJ/SMV, 12-CV-391-WJ/SMV (D.N.M.).

The law firms Becker & Poliakoff, LLP and Merrie Chappell Law PC
sought permission to withdraw as counsel of record for some of the
defendants, namely: Abdul Dabiri, ADF Financial, Inc. and Hossein
Alaghe Bandi, and later, Shahla Bandi a/k/a Shahla Zolfaghari.
Judith A. Wagner, Chapter 11 Trustee of The VCR Bankruptcy Estate,
opposed the Firms' requests.

On February 5, 2015, the parties reached a settlement of the case.
As a result of the settlement, Judge Vidmar entered an order
dismissing with prejudice as to all claims brought by the Trustee
against the Withdrawal Defendants and certain other defendants who
were unrepresented by counsel, and as to all claims that were
brought or could have been brought by the said defendants against
the Trustee or the bankruptcy estate.

The Firms were then permitted to withdraw as attorneys for the
Withdrawal Defendants, and the Trustee's request for attorney's
fees was dismissed with prejudice.

A copy of the May 28, 2015 order is available at
http://is.gd/r61naafrom Leagle.com.

Helen Davis Chaitman -- hchaitman@bplegal.com -- Julie Gorchkova --
jgorchkova@bplegal.com -- BECKER & POLIAKOFF, LLP, New York, NY,
Merrie L. Chappell, Albuquerque, NM, Attorneys for Defendants Said
Bandi a/k/a Said Alaghe Bandi, individually, Said Bandi d/b/a Bandi
Engineering, Bandi Engineering Company, Inc., Maryam Alaghe-Bandi,
and Hamid Alaghe Bandi.

James A. Askew -- jaskew@askewmazelfirm.com -- Edward A. Mazel --
Daniel A. White -- dwhite@askewmazelfirm.com -- Jacqueline N. Ortiz
-- jortiz@askewmazelfirm.com -- ASKEW & MAZEL, LLC, Albuquerque,
NM, Maureen A. Sanders, SANDERS & WESTBROOK, P.C., Albuquerque, NM,
Attorneys for Plaintiff.

             About The Vaughan Company Realtors

The Vaughan Company Realtors filed for Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. N.M. Case No. 10-10759) on Feb. 22, 2010.  George D.
Giddens, Jr., Esq., represents the Debtor in its restructuring
efforts.  The Company estimated both assets and debts of between
$1 million and $10 million.  Judith A. Wagner was appointed as
Chapter 11 Trustee.

Mr. Vaughan filed a separate Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. N.M.
Case No. 10-10763) on Feb. 22, 2010.  The case was converted to a
chapter 7 proceeding on May 20, 2010.  Yvette Gonzales is the duly
appointed trustee of the Chapter 7 estate.


VIACAO AREA SAO PAULO: Seeks U.S. Recognition of Brazilian Case
---------------------------------------------------------------
Brazilian carrier Viacao Area Sao Paulo S.A. filed a Chapter 15
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 15-22091) in Miami,
Florida, in the United States on July 2, 2015, to seek recognition
of its liquidation proceedings in Brazil.

Alexandre Tajra, the Brazilian court-appointed judicial
administrator, obtained authority from the Brazilian court to
commence an ancillary case seeking Chapter 15 recognition of the
Brazilian Proceeding.

VASP began operating as a commercial airline in 1933 with its
headquarters in Sao Paulo, Brazil.  Shortly after its founding, in
1935, financial distress prompted government intervention, and
ownership of 91.6% of VASP's common shares was transferred to the
Government of the State of Sao Paulo.  In 1990, Brazilian
businessman Wagner Canhedo Azevedo acquired ownership of VASP.

Following its acquisition by Mr. Canhedo, VASP began a period of
expansion in an effort to transition from a regional to an
international carrier.  At its peak, VASP offered commercial
flights from Brazil to many international destinations including
Miami; New York; Seoul, Korea and Brussels, Belgium.

By the turn of the century, however, VASP's fortunes had taken a
turn for the worse.  Among other reasons, the decline was
precipitated by the devaluation of the Brazilian Real in 1999. Left
with only its owned aircraft -- by that time, an aged fleet of
Boeing 727s/737s and Airbus A300s -- VASP cancelled all of its
international operations by 2002 and collapsed back into a regional
carrier within South America.

In the first half of 2005, VASP publicly disclosed its poor
financial condition, reporting cumulative losses of R$520 million
during 2004. According to VASP's accounting records, the company
had aggregate liabilities of R$3.287 billion as of December 2004.

On March 10, 2004, due to unpaid labor obligations, a lawsuit was
filed before the labor courts by the Public Attorney's Office for
the State of Sao Paulo and by two labor unions, Sindicato Nacional
dos Aeroviários and Sindicato Nacional dos Aeronautas. The
Fourteenth Labor Court of São Paulo ordered an intervention on
VASP, and Mr. Canhedo lost control over the administration of the
company.

On July 1, 2005, the interveners appointed by the Labor Court, with
the consent of the Public Attorney's Office, caused VASP to file a
petition for a judicial reorganization under the then newly-enacted
Brazilian Bankruptcy Law.  After the petition had been granted, a
report issued in December 2005 in support of VASP's then-proposed
plan of reorganization listed VASP's total assets as of June 2005
at R$2,963,097 million inclusive of (i) R$97 million in current
assets, (ii) R$1,410 million in planes, (iii) R$826 million in tax
credits, and (iv) R$726 million in accounts receivable.

                    Conversion to Liquidation

By order dated Oct. 7, 2005, the Brazilian Bankruptcy Court granted
VASP's petition commencing the Brazilian Proceeding as a "judicial
reorganization" under Brazilian Bankruptcy Law and appointing me as
Judicial Administrator thereof.

The goal of a "judicial reorganization" in Brazil is to reach a
judicially-supervised plan of reorganization between the debtor and
its creditors.

In accordance with Brazilian Bankruptcy Law, after the Brazilian
Proceeding had been commenced, VASP presented a plan of
reorganization which it believed, with the support of its
creditors, would allow it to continue operating the airline while
reducing its debt to a manageable level.  To that end, the
Brazilian Plan offered VASP's creditors one of two options: (i)
exchange their outstanding debts for a share of ownership in
specials funds into which VASP would transfer certain assets as
well as R$826 million of tax credits that were on the company's
balance sheet, or (ii) agree to discount the face amount and extend
the maturity of their claims, which would become the obligations of
a "low cost" airline to be created by VASP, which was called the
"Operational VASP."  Operational VASP would operate initially with
only six planes, thus reducing the size of VASP, and would also
provide airline maintenance and cargo services.

On Aug. 24, 2006, having obtained the requisite creditor support,
the Brazilian Plan was approved by the Brazilian Bankruptcy Court.
In the ensuing two year period, however, VASP failed to comply with
certain of its obligations under the plan.  As a result of these
developments, a meeting of creditors was called and held on July
17, 2008, the majority of VASP's creditors voted to petition the
Court to convert the judicial reorganization into a full bankruptcy
proceeding.

On Sept. 4, 2008, the Brazilian Bankruptcy Court entered an order
declaring VASP bankrupt and converting the judicial reorganization
into a liquidation.  At this point, continuing operations of VASP's
business -- which were limited, if any -- permanently ceased.

Upon the Brazilian Proceeding being converted to a liquidation, Mr.
Tajra, in his capacity as Judicial Administrator, became obligated
under the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law to collect and liquidate the
Debtor's assets under the supervision of the Brazilian Bankruptcy
Court in order to make distributions to creditors on account of
their allowed claims.  As of Aug. 27, 2010, the outstanding amount
of allowed claims against the Debtor's estate was R$5,069,936,783
(US$2,250,037,944) -- making the Brazilian Proceeding one of the
largest bankruptcy matters in modern Brazilian financial history.
By contrast, the readily identifiable assets remaining in the
Debtor's possession following conversion of the Brazilian
Proceeding were relatively minimal. For example, Mr. Tajra has
identified and am working to liquidate approximately R$100 million
of commercial buildings in Brazil belonging to the estate.
Furthermore, the Debtor had less than R$50 million in cash on hand
upon conversion, and since conversion a substantial portion of such
cash has been used to pay (or is being reserved to pay in the
future) the claims of postpetition creditors and administrative
expenses of the Debtor's estate.

As a result, the prospect of any substantial recovery becoming
available to the Debtor's creditors is largely dependent upon my
finding and retrieving valuable assets that had been transferred
away from the Debtor prior to the commencement of the Brazilian
Proceeding or its conversion from a judicial reorganization to a
liquidation.  To this end, for the benefit of the bankruptcy
creditors, the Public Attorney's Office for the State of Sao Paulo
has successfully petitioned the Brazilian Bankruptcy Court to
freeze the assets of certain third parties pending a determination
of whether they belong to or otherwise can be recovered by the
Debtor's estate.  Following such determination by the Brazilian
Bankruptcy Court, and subject to the Brazilian Proceeding being
granted chapter 15 recognition, Mr. Tajra anticipates requesting
the Court to enforce in the United States any relief that has been
or may be granted in Brazil authorizing me to recover assets from
third parties for the benefit of VASP's estate.

A copy of the declaration in support of the Chapter 15 petition is
available for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/VASP_Ch15_Declaration.pdf

A copy of the petition for recognition of the Brazilian proceedings
is available for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/VASP_Ch15_Recognition.pdf



WE CARE HOME: Case Summary & 8 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: We Care Home Care, Inc.
        P.O. Box 743
        Jonesville, LA 71343

Case No.: 15-80729

Nature of Business: Health Care

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Louisiana (Alexandria)

Judge: Hon. Henley A. Hunter

Debtor's Counsel: Bradley L. Drell, Esq.
                  GOLD, WEEMS, BRUSER, SUES & RUNDELL
                  POB 6118
                  Alexandria, LA 71307-6118
                  Tel: (318) 445-6471
                  Email: bdrell@goldweems.com

Total Assets: $505,900

Total Liabilities: $1.3 million

The petition was signed by Faye L. Collins, president/director.

A list of the Debtor's eight largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/lawb15-80729.pdf


WHISPERING PINES: Case Summary & 6 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Whispering Pines, Inc.
        c/o Robert Thomas
        P.O. Box 638
        Thomasville, Ga 31799

Case No.: 15-13891

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Nevada (Las Vegas)

Debtor's Counsel: David A Riggi, Esq.
                  DAVID A. RIGGI, ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW
                  5550 Painted MirageE Road #120
                  Las Vegas, NV 89149
                  Tel: (702) 808-0359
                  Email: darnvbk@gmail.com
                         riggilaw@gmail.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Robert Thomas III, president.

A list of the Debtor's six largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb15-13891.pdf


WHITTEN FOUNDATION: Court Approves McCollister McCleary as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Whitten Foundation sought and obtained permission from the Hon.
Robert Summerhays of the U.S. Bankruptcy court for the Western
District of Louisiana to employ McCollister, McCleary & Fazio, A
PLC as special counsel.

McCollister McCleary will assist Gerald J. Casey, the Debtor's
attorney, in certain matters involving this Chapter 11 case
including but not limited to, representing the Debtor in connection
with the proposed sale of the Debtor's real assets, Courtyard
Orleans Apartments in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and The Embers
Apartments in Lake Charles, Louisiana.

The hourly rate for Thomas D. Fazio is $225. The hourly rate for a
paralegal, Margie Riches, is $50. Thomas D. Fazio agrees that no
claim will be made for fees owed without application to and orders
from this Honorable Court.

McCollister, McCleary & Fazio, A PLC is an unsecured creditor of
the estate for legal services rendered prior to the filing of the
Chapter 11 petition in the total amount of $15,663.80. These unpaid
legal services were rendered to Foundation Embers, LLC in the
amount of $5,999.30 and Foundation Courtyard/Orleans, LLC in the
amount of $8,664.50. Each of these debts were assumed by Whitten
Foundation prior to the filing of this case.

Thomas D. Fazio, member of McCollister McCleary, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

McCollister McCleary can be reached at:

       Thomas D. Fazio, Esq.
       MCCOLLISTER, MCCLEARY & FAZIO, A PLC
       11616 Southfork Ave. Ste 302
       Baton Rouge, LA 70816
       Tel: (225) 292-8898

                      About Whitten Foundation

Whitten Foundation owns and operates two apartment complexes
located in the State of Louisiana.  Whitten Foundation sought
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No.
15-20237) in Lake Charles, Louisiana, on March 31, 2015.  The
Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and debt.

The Debtor's Chapter 11 plan and disclosure statement are due July
29, 2015.

Judge Robert Summerhays presides over the case.  The Debtor has
tapped Gerald J. Casey, Esq., in Lake Charles, Louisiana, as its
counsel.


WILLIS PROPERTIES: Case Summary & 7 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Willis Properties, LLLP
        1403B North Expressway
        Griffin, GA 30223-0019

Case No.: 15-11450

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Georgia (Newnan)

Debtor's Counsel: William J. Boone, Esq.
                  JAMES-BATES- BRANNAN-GROOVER LLP
                  Suite 1700
                  3399 Peachtree Road
                  Atlanta, GA 30326
                  Tel: (404) 997-6020
                  Fax: (404) 997-6021
                  Email: bboone@jamesbatesllp.com

Total Assets: $6.1 million

Total Liabilities: $3.3 million

The petition was signed by Kimsey B. Willis, general partner.

A list of the Debtor's seven largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb15-11450.pdf


WINDMILL INVESTMENT: Case Summary & 4 Top Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Windmill Investment Group, Inc.
        855 Lantana Ridge
        Spring Branch, TX 78070

Case No.: 15-51642

Nature of Business: Single Asset Real Estate

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 6, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Texas (San Antonio)

Debtor's Counsel: Dean William Greer, Esq.
                  2929 Mossrock, Suite 117
                  San Antonio, TX 78230
                  Tel: 210-342-7100
                  Fax: 210-342-3633
                  Email: dwgreer@sbcglobal.net

Total Assets: $1.2 million

Total Liabilities: $940,547

The petition was signed by Walter C. Windsor, president.

A list of the Debtor's four largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb15-51642.pdf


XINERGY CORP: Court Denies Jon Nix's Bid to Form Equity Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Virginia
denied Jon Nix's motion for entry of an order directing the
appointment of an official committee of equity security holders in
the Chapter 11 cases of Xinergy Ltd., et al.

Parties-in-interests and the Debtors objected to the motion.  

The Debtors related that the extraordinary remedy of appointing an
equity committee is not in the best interests of the Debtors'
estates or creditors.  According to the Debtors, the movant cannot
meet his burden of proving that the appointment of a committee is
necessary to assure the adequate representation of equity holders.


The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors said it agrees with
the Debtors' and the Informal Committee's position that the movant
must produce competent valuation evidence demonstrating that it is
appropriate to appoint an Equity Committee in the case.

Steve Platt, senior consultant at American Legal Claim Services,
LLC, claims and noticing agent for the Debtor stated that he served
documents on objection to the motion of Mr. Nix to appoint equity
committee.

The ad hoc group of holders of the 9.25% senior secured notes
issued by Xinergy, Ltd. and the lenders under the Debtors'
postpetition secured term loan credit facility, also objected to
the motion, stating that appointment of an official equity
committee is appropriate only in rare cases.  This is not one of
them, the noteholders group said.

On May 18, 2015, Mr. Nix, the holder of approximately 18.5% of the
issued and outstanding voting and non-voting shares of the Debtors
requested that the Court direct the appointment of an official
committee of equity security holders in the chapter 11 cases.
According to Mr. Nix, an Official Equity Committee is necessary to
give shareholders the meaningful role in the chapter 11 cases to
which they are entitled.  The Debtors have shown that, despite the
fact that they have not performed a valuation of the Debtors, they
believe the Debtors are not "hopelessly insolvent."  Additionally,
the current board and management have acted in disregard of the
rights and interests of shareholders and cannot substitute as
representatives for equity.  

Bristol Investment Fund. Ltd., the holder of approximately 7.25% of
the issued and outstanding common stock of the Debtors, filed a
joinder to the motion of Mr. Nix.

The Committee is represented by:

         Michael E. Hastings, Esq.
         Brandy M. Rapp, Esq.
         WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON LLP
         114 Market Street, Suite 210
         Roanoke, VA 24011
         Tel: (540) 759-3579
         Fax: (540) 759-3569
         E-mail: mhastings@wtplaw.com
                 brapp@wtplaw.com

         Michael J. Roeschenthaler, Esq.
         McGUIREWOODS LLP
         EQT Plaza
         625 Liberty Avenue, 23rd Floor
         Pittsburgh, PA 15222
         Tel: (412) 667-6000
         Fax: (412) 667-6050
         E-mail: mroeschenthaler@mcguirewoods.com

                - and -

         Douglas M. Foley, Esq.
         Sarah B. Boehm, Esq.
         McGUIREWOODS LLP
         One James Center
         901 E. Cary Street
         Richmond, VA 23219
         Tel: (804) 775-1000
         Fax: (804) 775-1067
         E-mail: dfoley@mcguirewoods.com
                 sboehm@mcguirewoods.com

                        About Xinergy Ltd.

Xinergy is a U.S. producer of metallurgical and thermal coal with
mineral reserves, mining operations and coal properties located in
the Central Appalachian ("CAPP") regions of West Virginia and
Virginia.  Xinergy's operations principally include two active
mining complexes known as South Fork and Raven Crest located in
Greenbrier and Boone Counties, West Virginia.  Xinergy also leases
or owns the mineral rights to properties located in Fayette,
Nicholas and Greenbrier Counties, West Virginia and Wise County,
Virginia. Collectively, Xinergy leases or owns mineral rights to
approximately 72,000 acres with proven and probable coal reserves
of approximately 77 million tons and additional estimated reserves
of 40 million tons.

Xinergy Ltd. and 25 subsidiaries commenced Chapter 11 bankruptcy
cases (Bankr. W.D. Va. Lead Case No. 15-70444) on April 6, 2015.
The cases have been assigned to Judge Paul M. Black.  The cases are
being jointly administered for procedural purposes.

Xinergy Ltd. disclosed $36,968,445 in assets and $215,000,000 in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

The Debtors tapped Hunton & Williams LLP as attorneys; Global
Hunter Securities, as financial advisor, and American Legal Claims
Services, LLC as claims, noticing and balloting agent.

The U.S. Trustee appointed a two member official committee of
unsecured creditors.  The Committee tapped to retain McGuireWoods
LLP as lead counsel, and Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP as its
local counsel.



[*] Legal 500 U.S. Recognizes Thompson Hine's Bankruptcy Practice
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Thompson Hine LLP on July 6 announced its inclusion in the 2015
edition of The Legal 500 United States, a directory of client- and
peer-recommended firms, practices and lawyers used by clients
throughout the country to guide their selection of lawyers and law
firms.  Published for more than 20 years, The Legal 500 series
provides information and opinions about firms and lawyers across
the globe based on interviews with lawyers and representatives from
client companies.  Five of the firm's practices and 15 lawyers are
recommended as listed below.

In addition, the publication's "Leading Lawyers" listings, which
recognize outstanding lawyers nationwide in each practice category,
hail Construction practice chair Jeffrey R. Appelbaum and
Frank D. Chaiken, chair of the firm's Corporate practice, among the
country's 24 leading lawyers for construction and middle-market M&A
work, respectively.

The firm's Construction practice is ranked in the top tier, placing
it among the top five firms in the United States.  The practice
earns acclaim for its "substantial expertise in new stadia work,"
cited as "outstanding."  Of special note, clients and peers who
provided feedback consider practice chair Appelbaum "a unique
national resource for large or complicated construction projects."
In addition Patrick J. Sweeney is recommended by name.

The firm's Business Restructuring, Creditors' Rights & Bankruptcy
practice is called a "go-to firm for difficult and complex issues"
and "attracts glowing praise for its 'clear and considered
strategy' and 'very deep bench.'"  Practice chair Alan R. Lepene is
referred to as "creative and quick on his feet."

Praise for the firm's Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation
practice indicates that the team offers "great value and expertise"
regarding qualified retirement plans, health and welfare, executive
compensation, ERISA litigation and fiduciary matters.  Partner
Timothy R. Brown is called "exceptional" and practice chair Laura
A. Ryan is also singled out.

Clients commenting on the firm's middle-market M&A practice say its
"M&A lawyers are true professionals when it comes to mid-market
transactions, and consistently provide responsive, expert and
cost-effective advice.  They will also provide whatever resources
are necessary to get the deal done on the client's timeline."
Practice chair Chaiken is noted for combining "extensive deal
experience with in-house expertise."  Other partners singled out
for sophisticated deal work include Thomas A. Aldrich, Jim
Balthaser, Corby J. Baumann, Garrett D. Evers, Tony Kuhel and David
A. Neuhardt.

The firm's Real Estate practice is noted for its successful
completion of a wide variety of transactions across the United
States in 2014, including major portfolio property acquisitions and
development deals.  Clients praise the 15-partner team for
achieving consistent results and note that "the team leadership and
supporting subject matter experts work seamlessly."  Partner James
B. Aronoff is deemed to be "brilliant" and partner Robyn Minter
Smyers is praised for being "knowledgeable."  Recent practice
additions Stephen B. Schrock and Christine Schneider are also
mentioned.

In addition to the practice rankings, 15 Thompson Hine lawyers are
recommended by name:

   -- Thomas A. Aldrich (M&A: Middle-Market (sub-$500m))
   -- Jeffrey R. Appelbaum (Construction)
   -- James B. Aronoff (Real Estate)
   -- Jim Balthaser (M&A: Middle-Market (sub-$500m))
   -- Corby J. Baumann (M&A: Middle-Market (sub-$500m))
   -- Frank D. Chaiken (M&A: Middle-Market (sub-$500m))
   -- Thomas J. Coyne (Real Estate)
   -- Garrett D. Evers (M&A: Middle-Market (sub-$500m))
   -- Tony Kuhel (M&A: Middle-Market (sub-$500m))
   -- Alan R. Lepene (Corporate Restructuring
     (including Bankruptcy))
   -- David A. Neuhardt (M&A: Middle-Market (sub-$500m))
   -- Christine Schneider (Real Estate)
   -- Stephen B. Schrock (Real Estate)
   -- Robyn Minter Smyers (Real Estate)
   -- Patrick J. Sweeney (Construction)

                      About Thompson Hine LLP

Thompson Hine LLP -- http://www.ThompsonHine.com-- is a
full-service business law firm with approximately 400 lawyers in 7
offices.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2015.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.

                   *** End of Transmission ***