TCR_Public/170926.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Tuesday, September 26, 2017, Vol. 21, No. 268

                            Headlines

2020 PITKIN REALTY: Exclusive Plan Filing Extended to Nov. 13
21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY: Plan Exclusivity Period Moved to Jan. 20
2301 INVESTORS: Hires Kurtzman Steady as Counsel
5 C HOLDINGS: Creditor's Panel Hires Walter Wilhelm as Counsel
680 MONTAUK HIGHWAY: Hires Mark E. Cohen as Counsel

724 EAST DEVONSHIRE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
A & B ASSOCIATES: Has Final Authority to Use FCRE Cash Collateral
AAA NURSING: Wants to Use Cash Collateral for Operations
ACER THERAPEUTICS: Hires Wolf & Company as New Auditors
AEROGROUP INT'L: Wants to Use Cash Collateral to Finance Operations

ALL-STATE FIRE: Wants To Use WF's Cash & Accounts Receivable
AMERICAN POWER: $500,000 Loan Maturity Extended to Oct. 2017
AMERICAN POWER: Fails to Comply with OTC Market Bid Price Rule
AMERIFLEX ENGINEERING: Has Until September 29 to Circulate Plan
AMPLIPHI BIOSCIENCES: Closes Issuance of 551.9K Common Shares

ANTERO MIDSTREAM: S&P Affirms 'BB' CCR on Good Credit Metrics
ARIZONA FUNDRAISING: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
ART & DENTISTRY: Hires David E. Lynn as Bankruptcy Counsel
AUTHENTIC GELATO: Oct. 2 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
AVANTOR INC: Fitch Cuts Senior Unsecured Notes Rating to B-/RR5

AYTU BIOSCIENCE: Amends 9.8 Million Shares Resale Prospectus
BIOSCRIP INC: Britt Jeffcoat Departs as VP Controller and CAO
BLACK IRON: Allowed to File Reorganization Plan Until January 27
BLACK MOUNTAIN GOLF: Plan Exclusivity Period Moved Until Jan. 31
BMW PARTNERSHIP: Ch. 11 Trustee Files Amended Plan of Liquidation

BRIGGS DEVELOPMENT: Hires Access Realty as Real Estate Broker
BUFFETS LLC: Court Grants Greenberg Traurig's Fee Application
CALIFORNIA RESOURCES: S&P Affirms 'CCC+' CCR, Outlook Negative
CAPITOL STATION: Unsecured Non-Priority Claims to Get 100% in 36Mos
CARLSON TRAVEL: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative & Affirms 'B' CCR

CATHEDRAL HILL: May Use Up To $135K in Cash Collateral
CINCINNATI BELL: S&P Rates New $350MM Senior Unsecured Notes 'B-'
CLUB VILLAGE: Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to Nov. 20
COLLEGE PARK: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
CONTOURGLOBAL LP: Fitch Hikes Long-Term IDR to BB-; Outlook Stable

CORNERSTONE APPAREL: Taps SierraConstellation as Financial Advisor
CRYOPORT INC: Deregisters 2 Million Unsold Common Shares
DAVID FOTHERGILL: Hiffeo Buying Lee's Summit Property
DIAZ PROPERTY: Dime Bank to Receive $626 Monthly Over 15 Years
DR. LUIS A. VINAS: Wants to Use Cash for October 2017 Expenses

DUFF & PHELPS: Moody's Rates $950MM Secured Loans 'B2'
EARTH PRIDE: Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to Jan. 25
EDWARD J. MALIK: Disclosures Approved; Nov. 8 Plan Hearing
ENDLESS SALES: Wants to Use Compass' Cash Collateral Until Nov. 30
ENERGY FUTURE: V. Dotson Suit Not Subject to Automatic Stay

ERIE STREET: Unsecureds to Recoup 100% Plus Interest Under New Plan
ERIN ENERGY: Bello Performs Tasks of Principal Financial Officer
EXCO RESOURCES: Two Directors Quit From Board
FARMACIAS FREDDY: Unsecureds to Get 23.14% Over 24 Months
FOSSIL GROUP: S&P Lowers CCR to 'B+', Outlook Negative

FRIENDSHIP VILLAGE: Unsecureds to Get Deferred Cash Payments
GELTECH SOLUTIONS: Chairman Swaps Notes for 5.7 Million Shares
GELTECH SOLUTIONS: President Has 58% Equity Stake as of Sept. 18
GENERAL WIRELESS: Oct. 25 Plan Confirmation Hearing
GNC HOLDINGS: S&P Lowers CCR to B+ on Heightened Competitive Risk

GOLDEN DAY SCHOOLS: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
GRAND VIEW FINANCIAL: Hires Keller Williams as Real Estate Broker
GREAT BASIN: CFO Now Works 20 Hours Per Week
GREEN TERRACE CONDOMINIUM: Hires Genovese Joblove as Counsel
GREENLIGHT ORGANIC: Hires Crowell & Moring as Special Counsel

GROUP ONE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
GUIDED SYSTEMS: Hires Warren Averett as Accountant
HARD ROCK EXPLORATION: Taps Fowler Bell as Bankruptcy Counsel
HARRINGTON & KING: May Use Cash Collateral Through Sept. 29
HELIOS AND MATHESON: Enters Into Exchange Pact With Palladium

HIGH COUNTRY FUSION: Wants to Use Cash Collateral Through Nov. 30
HIGH STANDARD: A. Aronstein Can Conduct Additional Discovery
INT'L MANUFACTURING: Tribe's Bid to Dismiss Clawback Suit Denied
INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS: Regains Compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule
IRONCLAD PERFORMANCE: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee

JASON MAZZEI: Mances Buying Meadville Property for $100K
JASON MAZZEI: Van Ho Buying Wilkes-Barre Property for $19K
JTS LLC: Anchorage Property to Be Sold at Nov. 7 Auction
KID BRANDS: U.S. Trustee Seeks Case Conversion to Chapter 7
LAKEWOOD AT GEORGIA: Wants To Use Cash Collateral Until Dec. 4

LEA POWER: Fitch Affirms BB+ Rating on $235.8MM Sr. Secured Notes
LIGNUS INC: Wants to Use DirectCapital Cash Collateral
LIVING BENEFITS FINANCIAL: Oct. 18 Hearing on Plan Confirmation
LSC COMMUNICATIONS: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable & Affirms B+ CCR
MANN REALTY ASSOCIATES: Hires Keen-Summit as Real Estate Broker

MARRIOTT VACATIONS: S&P Rates Unsecured Notes Due 2022 'BB+'
MEDIAOCEAN LLC: S&P Affirms 'B' CCR Amid $90MM 1st Lien Loan Add-On
MICHAEL D. COHEN: Pocius Buying Bethany Beach for $285K
MOGUL ENERGY: Files for Chapter 7 Protection
MOORINGS REGENCY: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for Nov. 9

MOUNTAIN BLUE: Wants to Use US National Bank's Cash Collateral
MPM HOLDINGS: Posts $19 Million Net Income in Second Quarter
NATIONAL TRUCK: Wants Jan. 22 as Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline
NEW BEGINNINGS: Pinewood, 3 Others File 4th Amended Exit Plans
NEW YORK CRANE: Has Final Nod to Obtain Financing From Cobra Kai

NORTHERN MEADOWS: Files Chapter 11 Liquidation Plan
OAKS OF PRAIRIE: Wants to Use Illinois Bank's Cash Collateral
OLD FASHION BUTCHER: Unsecureds to Get 40% in 60 Monthly Payments
OPEXA THERAPEUTICS: Closes Merger with Acer Therapeutics
ORACLE OIL: Hires Timothy C. Ellender as Special Counsel

OUTER BANKS: Tinkham Family Trust Allowed to Amend Claim
P.E. O'HALLORAN: May Use Cash Collateral of Machias Until Sept. 30
PATTY DEWITT: Hadoxes Buying Morgantown Property for $2.4 Million
PEEKAY ACQUISITION: Hires Rust/Omni as Administrative Agent
PENINSULA AIRWAYS: Wants to Use Cash Collateral Through Dec. 31

PERFUMANIA HOLDINGS: Receives Nasdaq Listing Non-Compliance Notice
PETCO HOLDINGS: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative on Soft Performance
PNEUMA INTERNATIONAL: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
POINTE PROPERTIES: Wants Approval to Use Monroe Cash Collateral
PORTER BANCORP: Cancels Registration of Unsold Securities

QUADRANT 4: Has Final Nod to Access $900K of DIP Financing
QUADRANT 4: Seeks OK of Key Employee Incentive Plan
RDL LLC: Santanas Buying Little Falls Property for $850K
RESOLUTE ENERGY: Posts $13.2 Million Net Income in Second Quarter
REVOLUTION ALUMINUM: Acadiana Railway Objects to Plan Outline

REVOLUTION ALUMINUM: Cleco Power Says Plan Disclosures Insufficient
REVOLUTION ALUMINUM: To Pay Debts Using Real Estate Sale Proceeds
REX ENERGY: Signs Marketing Agreement with BP Energy
RISE ENTERPRISES: Seeks Approval of Cash Collateral Agreement
ROCKY PINE: Wants to Use Cash Collateral for 90 Days

RUE21 INC: Landlords Object to Plan Assumption Schedules
RYCKMAN CREEK: Hires Great American as Valuation Consultant
SAMUEL J. HAMILTON: York Industrial Board Buying Equipment for $45K
SEADRILL LTD: U.S. Trustee Forms 7-Member Creditors' Committee
SIERRA CHEMICAL: Has Nod to Secure $1.2M Financing From Carus

SK HOLDCO: S&P Affirms 'B-' CCR, Outlook Remains Stable
SOUTHWEST RANCHING: Court Confirms Arbitrator's Final Decision
SRQ TAXI MANAGEMENT: Hires Jennis Law as Counsel
TIME INC: S&P Affirms 'B' Corp Credit Rating on Debt Refinancing
TMT USA: Latest Plan Discloses 2nd Potential OFAC Concern

TOURS INCORPORATED: Court Denies Approval of Disclosure Statement
TRUE RELIGION: Hires Cushman & Wakefield as Listing Agent
TUCSON ONE: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors
ULTRA PETROLEUM: Must Pay OpCo Noteholders Make-Whole Amount
UNITED CHARTER: Can Use Cash Collateral Through Oct. 31

UPLIFT RX: Hires Kimball Legal as Special Counsel
VALLEY PETROLEUM: Seeks Permission to Use Cash Until January 2018
VELA'S 4 STARS: Hires Nai Rio Grande as Real Estate Broker
VENOCO LLC: Allowed to File Chapter 11 Plan Until December 13
W&T OFFSHORE: Will Hold 'Say-on-Pay' Votes Triennially

WASHINGTON MUTUAL: M. Sutton Suit Dismissed for Lack of Service
WESTERN ENERGY: Moody's Withdraws 'Caa1' Corp. Family Rating
WILLIAM J. KARDASH: IRS Granted $4.3-Mil. Gen. Unsecured Claim
WOMEN'S HEALTH: May Use Cash Collateral Until Oct. 12
[^] Large Companies with Insolvent Balance Sheet


                            *********

2020 PITKIN REALTY: Exclusive Plan Filing Extended to Nov. 13
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Elizabeth S. Stong of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of New York has extended, at the behest of 2200
Pitkin Realty, LLC, the exclusive period for the Debtor to file a
plan of reorganization through and including Nov. 13, 2017, and the
exclusive period for the Debtor to solicit acceptances of the plan
through and including Jan. 8, 2018.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on July 25, 2017, the
Debtor asked the Court to extend the exclusive periods for 90 days,
saying that while its case may not be a particularly large case,
the issues facing the Debtor require a great amount of attention
and time to resolve.  The Debtor asserted that it needs more time
to continue resolving its issues with its lender.

                    About 2200 Pitkin Realty

2200 Pitkin Realty LLC, a single asset real estate, is the owner of
real property known as and located at 2200 Pitkin Avenue, Brooklyn,
New York.

2200 Pitkin Realty sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-40082) on Jan. 9,
2017.  The petition was signed by Andres Lopez, owner.

The case is assigned to Judge Nancy Hershey Lord.

Rashmi Attri, Esq., at E. Waters & Associates, P.C., serves as the
Debtor's legal counsel.


21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY: Plan Exclusivity Period Moved to Jan. 20
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Robert D. Drain of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York extended the exclusive period during
which 21st Century Oncology Holdings and its affiliated debtors can
file a Chapter 11 plan and solicit acceptances thereof through and
including January 20, 2018 and March 21, 2018, respectively.  

In seeking an extension of the exclusivity periods,
BankruptcyData.com reported, the Debtor said, "Less than four
months from the Petition Date, the Debtors have made substantial
progress towards achieving their restructuring goals and taking the
steps necessary to implement the restructuring transactions
contemplated by that certain Restructuring Support Agreement, dated
May 25, 2015. . . .  Indeed, in compliance with the milestones set
forth in the RSA, on July 14, 2017, the Debtors' filed a plan of
reorganization (the 'Plan') and on August 13, 2017 the Debtors'
filed the related disclosure statement (the 'Disclosure
Statement').  The hearing on the adequacy of the Debtors'
Disclosure Statement that embodies the Debtors' restructuring
transactions is scheduled to take place on Sept. 19, 2017. Despite
having already filed a Plan, the Debtors believe it is prudent to
seek an extension of the Exclusivity Periods in order to preserve
their exclusive ability to file and solicit a new plan of
reorganization, should unforeseen issues arise with respect to the
confirmation of the Plan."

                 About 21st Century Oncology

21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc., is a global provider of
integrated cancer care services.  As of March 31, 2017, the company
operated 179 treatment centers, including 143 centers located in 17
U.S. states and 36 centers located in seven countries in Latin
America.

21st Century and 59 U.S. affiliates filed Chapter 11 petitions
under the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-22770)
on May 25, 2017.  At the time of the filing, the Debtors estimated
their assets and debt at $1 billion to $10 billion.

The cases are pending before the Hon. Judge Robert D. Drain.

Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at Morrison & Foerster LLP, serves as the
Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is
the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.

On June 8, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee has
tapped Morrison & Foerster LLP as counsel and Berkeley Research
Group, LLC, and financial advisor.


2301 INVESTORS: Hires Kurtzman Steady as Counsel
------------------------------------------------
2301 Investors, LP, and its debtor-affiliates seeks authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
to employ Kurtzman Steady, LLC, as counsel to the Debtor.

2301 Investors requires Kurtzman Steady to:

   a. advise the Debtors with respect to its rights, powers
      and duties in the bankruptcy case;

   b. take all necessary action to protect and preserve the
      Debtors' estate, including the prosecution of actions on
      its behalf, defense of any actions commenced against the
      Debtors, the negotiations concerning all litigation and
      disputes in which the Debtors is involved, and review,
      analyze and object to claims filed against the Debtor's
      estate;

   c. prepare and file on behalf of the Debtors all necessary
      motions, applications, answers, orders, reports and papers
      in connection with the administration of the Debtors'
      estate; and

   d. perform all other necessary legal services in connection
      with the Chapter 11 case.

Kurtzman Steady will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Jeffrey Kurtzman                 $480
     Maureen Steady                   $325

Kurtzman Steady will be paid a retainer in the amount of $1,659,
and the filing fee of $1,717.

Kurtzman Steady will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Jeffrey Kurtzman, partner of Kurtzman Steady, LLC, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Kurtzman Steady can be reached at:

     Jeffrey Kurtzman, Esq.
     KURTZMAN STEADY, LLC
     401 S. 2nd Street, Suite 200
     Philadelphia, PA 19147
     Tel: (215) 839-1222
     E-mail: kurtzman@kurtzmansteady.com

                   About 2301 Investors, LP

2301 Investors, L.P., is a partnership created in 2011 for the
purpose of acquiring the property at 2301 Hunting Park Avenue,
Philadelphia, PA. 2301 Investors is a limited partnership between
Dean Ciafiero, DTC Corporation and Hunting Fox GP I.

A scheduled sheriff sale for delinquent real estate taxes and water
bills prompted 2301 Investors' Chapter 11 filing (Bankr. E.D. Pa.
Case No. 15-14255) on June 17, 2015.

2525 Investors, LP, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
E.D. Penn. Case No. 16-10960) on February 15, 2016, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.

The Debtors are represented by Demetrius J. Parrish, Esq., at The
Law Offices of Demetrius J. Parrish.


5 C HOLDINGS: Creditor's Panel Hires Walter Wilhelm as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Creditor's Committee of 5 C Holdings, Inc., seeks authorization
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
California to retain Walter Wilhelm Law Group, as counsel to the
Committee.

The Committee requires Walter Wilhelm to represent and perform
legal services to the Committee in relation to the Debtor's
bankruptcy proceedings, and assist the Committee in performing its
duties as set forth in 11 U.S.C. Section 1103(c).

Walter Wilhelm will be paid at the hourly rate of $185-$495.  The
firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred.

Riley C. Walter, partner of Walter Wilhelm Law Group, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and (a) is not
creditors, equity security holders or insiders of the Debtor; (b)
has not been, within two years before the date of the filing of the
Debtor's chapter 11 petition, directors, officers or employees of
the Debtor; and (c) does not have an interest materially adverse to
the interest of the estate or of any class of creditors or equity
security holders, by reason of any direct or indirect relationship
to, connection with, or interest in, the Debtor, or for any other
reason.

Walter Wilhelm can be reached at:

     Riley C. Walter, Esq.
     WALTER WILHELM LAW GROUP
     205 E River Park Circle, Suite 410
     Fresno, CA 93720
     Tel: (559) 435-9800

                   About 5 C Holdings, Inc.

5 C Holdings, Inc., owns and operates a drilling and oilfield
service business. It was incorporated in March 2009 and operates
its business in the State of California.  Cami Hogg is the sole
officer, director and shareholder of the Company. Ms. Hogg's
husband, Casey, is employed by the Company. The Hoggs have 40 years
of experience in the petroleum business.

5 C Holdings filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. E.D.
Cal. Case No. 17-11591) on April 25, 2017.  Cami Hogg, as
president, signed the petition. The Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities ranging from $500,000 to 1 million. The case is
assigned to Judge Fredrick E. Clement. The Debtor is represented by
Leonard K. Welsh, Esq., at the Law Offices of Leonard K. Welsh.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of 5 C Holdings, Inc.  The Committee hired
Walter Wilhelm Law Group, as counsel.


680 MONTAUK HIGHWAY: Hires Mark E. Cohen as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
680 Montauk Highway, L.L.C., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York to employ
Mark E. Cohen, Esq., as counsel to the Debtor.

680 Montauk Highway requires Mark E. Cohen to:

   a. provide the Debtor with advice and prepare all necessary
      documents regarding debt restructuring, bankruptcy and
      asset dispositions, including working with the secured
      creditors to negotiate modifications of mortgages;

   b. take all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
      Debtor's estate during the pendency of the Chapter 11,
      case, including the prosecution of actions by the Debtor,
      the defense of actions commenced against the Debtor,
      negotiations concerning litigation in which the Debtor
      is involved and object to claims filed against the
      estate;

   c. prepare on behalf of the Debtor, as a Debtor in
      possession, all necessary motions, applications,
      answers, orders, reports and papers in connection
      with the administration of the Chapter 11 case;

   d. counsel the Debtor with regard to its rights and
      obligations as a Debtor in possession;

   e. appear in Court and protect the interest of the Debtor
      before the Court; and

   f. perform all other legal services for the Debtor which
      may be necessary and proper in the bankruptcy
      proceeding.

Mark E. Cohen will be paid at the hourly rate of $400.  Mark E.
Cohen received $4,000 as retainer, with $1,717 filing fee.

Mark E. Cohen will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Mark E. Cohen, Esq., assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtor and its estates.

Mark E. Cohen can be reached at:

     Mark E. Cohen, Esq.
     108-18 Queens Boulevard, 4th Floor ,Suite 3
     Forest Hills, NY 11375
     Tel: (718) 258-1500
     Fax: (718) 793-1627

               About 680 Montauk Highway, L.L.C.

680 Montauk Highway, L.L.C., based in Hampton Bays, NY, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-75626) on
September 14, 2017. The Hon. Alan S. Trust presides over the case.
Mark E. Cohen, Esq., serves as bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $900,000 in assets and $1.25
million in liabilities. The petition was signed by Gary S. Bronat,
managing member and owner of 99% membership interest.


724 EAST DEVONSHIRE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 724 East Devonshire, LLC
        2224 E. Pinchot Avenue
        Phoenix, AZ 85016

Type of Business: Single Asset Real Estate (as defined in 11
                  U.S.C. Section 101(51B))

Case No.: 17-11126

Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 21, 2017

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Arizona (Phoenix)

Judge: Hon. Daniel P. Collins

Debtor's Counsel: Hilary L Barnes, Esq.
                  ALLEN BARNES & JONES, PLC
                  1850 N. Central Ave., Suite 1150
                  Phoenix, AZ 85004
                  Tel: 602-256-6000
                  Fax: 602-252-4712
                  E-mail: hbarnes@allenbarneslaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Qingcheng Bao, manager/member.

The Debtor did not file a list of 20 largest unsecured creditors
together with the petition.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb17-11126.pdf


A & B ASSOCIATES: Has Final Authority to Use FCRE Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Edward J. Coleman, III of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Georgia has issued a final order extending
the period within which A & B Associates, L.P., may use the cash
collateral of FCRE REL, LLC.

The Debtor and FCRE conferred and have agreed to extend the use of
cash collateral on the terms ordered by the Court in the Amended
Cash Collateral Order through and including the entry of an order
confirming a plan of reorganization, conversion of the Bankruptcy
Case to one under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, appointment of
a trustee, dismissal of this Bankruptcy Case or until further order
of court.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated Sept. 7, 2017, is available at
https://is.gd/DLcWza

                  About A & B Associates, L.P.

A & B Associates, L.P., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.
Ga. Case No. 17-40185) on Feb. 3, 2017.  Christopher L. Kettles,
managing general partner, signed the petition.  The case is
assigned to Judge Edward J. Coleman III.  The Debtor is represented
by C. James McCallar, Jr., Esq., at the McCallar Law Firm.  At the
time of filing, the Debtor had $5.48 million in assets and $3.93
million in liabilities.


AAA NURSING: Wants to Use Cash Collateral for Operations
--------------------------------------------------------
AAA Nursing Services Inc. seeks permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California to use cash collateral
to pay for payroll and for day to day operating expenses.

The Debtor doesn't own any real property.  The Debtor generates
income from providing skilled nursing care to patients at their
residences.  Due to the competitive nature of this healthcare
business, it must pay its employees and daily operating expense on
a timely basis in order to retain its employees, patients and bring
in additional revenue.  

The principal liability of the Debtor is the obligation owed to the
Internal Revenue Services for unpaid payroll taxes in the secured
amount of approximately $255,482.02 and priority unsecured amount
of approximately $125,805.24.  Corporation Service Company, as
representative of creditor Fora Financial, has a UCC-l filing with
the California Secretary of State for $18,191.50.  Atlas General
Insurance Services, LLC, has a notice of judgment lien filed with
the California Secretary of State on March 13, 2017, in the amount
of $39,506.31.

The Debtor's business is the Debtor's primary asset.  The asset is
well managed and is generating positive cash flow.  Moreover, the
Debtor's recent operating results and future projections indicate
that this trend will continue and improve over the next year,
providing ample adequate protection to the Secured Creditor's
interest.  The Debtor seeks the emergency use of cash collateral
for the payment of payroll and daily operating expenses.  The
Debtor agrees to make adequate protection payments in the amount of
$2,000 per month to the IRS while the Debtor; formulates its
Chapter 11 reorganization plan.

The Debtor's business must provide its clients with the highest
quality of service.  The failure to provide clients with the
highest quality of service on a continuous basis will result in
irreparable reputational damage, revenues and asset values.  To
provide this level of service, the Debtor requires the immediate
use of all cash and cash equivalents on hand and hereafter
generated, whether the same constitutes Cash Collateral, or not.

The secured creditor is to be protected against a decrease in value
which directly affects the secured creditor's interest in its
collateral.

The Debtor must pay its payroll and day to day operating expenses
timely for its employees to work and for the business to generate
profit for the Debtor, which will ultimately be used in formulating
a Chapter 11 reorganization plan.  Unless the Debtor is permitted
to use cash collateral for the payroll and day-to-day operating
expense, the Debtor will be at risk of losing its current employees
and possibly jeopardizing the Debtor's plan of reorganization.

The Debtor says it has demonstrated that the emergency use of cash
collateral as proposed by the Debtor to pay for payroll and its
day-to-day operating expenses will benefit the Debtor's estate and
the creditors, including the Secured Creditors, since the Debtor
will continue to generate income necessary for proposing a feasible
reorganization plan.  A successful reorganization depends upon the
use of cash collateral, the Debtor states.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-12433-7.pdf

                         About AAA Nursing

Headquartered in Canoga Park, California, AAA Nursing Services Inc.
filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case
No. 17-12433) on Sept. 12, 2017.  The Debtor is represented by:

     Michael Jay Berger, Esq.
     Sofya Davtyan, Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL JAY BERGER
     9454 Wilshire Boulevard 6th Floor
     Beverly Hills, CA 90212-2929
     Tel: (310) 271-6223
     Fax: (310) 271-9805
     E-mail: michael.berger@bankruptcypower.com


ACER THERAPEUTICS: Hires Wolf & Company as New Auditors
-------------------------------------------------------
Acer Therapeutics Inc. engaged Wolf & Company, P.C., as its
principal accountants for the fiscal year ending Dec. 31, 2017, and
dismissed MaloneBailey, LLP.  The decision to change accountants
was approved by the audit committee of the Company's board of
directors.

The report of MaloneBailey, LLP on the Registrant's consolidated
financial statements for the years ended Dec. 31, 2016 and 2015 did
not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor was it
qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting
principles, except that the financial statements of the Registrant
for the fiscal years ended Dec. 31, 2016 and 2015 expressed, in an
explanatory paragraph, substantial doubt about the Registrant's
ability to continue as a going concern due to recurring losses,
negative operating cash flows and an accumulated deficit.

During the years ended Dec. 31, 2016 and 2015, and the subsequent
interim period through September 19, 2017, there were no: (1)
disagreements (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K
and the related instructions) with MaloneBailey, LLP on any matter
of accounting principles or practices, financial statement
disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreement if
not resolved to the satisfaction of MaloneBailey, LLP would have
caused MaloneBailey, LLP to make reference thereto in its reports
on the consolidated financial statements for such years, or (2)
reportable events (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation
S-K).

On Sept. 20, 2017, the audit committee of the Company's board of
directors approved the engagement of Wolf & Company, P.C. as the
Registrant's independent registered public accounting firm for the
fiscal year ending Dec. 31, 2017.  Prior to the completion of the
Merger, Wolf & Company, P.C. served as the auditor of Private
Acer.

During the years ended Dec. 31, 2016, and 2015, and the subsequent
interim period through Sept. 19, 2017, neither the Company nor
anyone on its behalf consulted with Wolf & Company, P.C., regarding
either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific
transaction, completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion
that might be rendered on the Registrant's financial statements,
and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to the
Registrant that Wolf & Company, P.C. concluded was an important
factor considered by the Registrant in reaching a decision as to
any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue or (ii) any
matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in
Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions)
or a reportable event (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K).

                    About Acer Therapeutics

Headquartered in Cambridge, MA, Acer Therapeutics --
http://www.acertx.com/-- is a pharmaceutical company that
acquires, develops and intends to commercialize therapies for
patients with serious rare and ultra-rare diseases with critical
unmet medical need.  Acer's late-stage clinical pipeline includes
two candidates for severe genetic disorders for which there are few
or no FDA-approved treatments: EDSIVO (celiprolol) for vEDS, and
ACER-001 (a fully taste-masked, immediate release formulation of
sodium phenylbutyrate) for urea cycle disorders (UCD) and Maple
Syrup Urine Disease (MSUD).  There are no FDA-approved drugs for
vEDS and MSUD and limited options for UCD, which collectively
impact more than 4,000 patients in the United States.  Acer's
products have clinical proof-of-concept and mechanistic
differentiation, and Acer intends to seek approval for them in the
United States by using the regulatory pathway established under
section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or
FFDCA, that allows an applicant to rely for approval at least in
part on third-party data, which is expected to expedite the
preparation, submission, and approval of a marketing application.

Opexa incurred a net loss of $7.98 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2016, compared to a net loss of $12.01 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of June 30, 2017, Opexa had $1.98 million
in total assets, $368,547 in total liabilities and $1.61 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Malonebailey, LLP -- http://www.malonebailey.com/-- in Houston,
Texas, issued a "going concern" qualification on the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that
the Company has incurred recurring losses, negative operating cash
flows and an accumulated deficit that raise substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern.


AEROGROUP INT'L: Wants to Use Cash Collateral to Finance Operations
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Aerogroup International, Inc., and certain of its affiliates seek
permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to use until Oct. 16, 2017, cash collateral to ensure that
they are able to continue the operation of their business during
the pendency of the Chapter 11 cases while the Debtors pursue a
partial liquidation through the store closing sales at their retail
stores and the reorganization of their remaining business units.

Entities with interest in cash collateral include:

     -- Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Agent, L/C
        Issuer, Lender and Swing Line Lender under that certain
        Credit Agreement dated as of June 9, 2014;

     -- THL Corporate Finance, Inc., as Administrative Agent
        and Collateral Agent and the other Lenders from time to
        time party thereto under that certain Term Loan
        Agreement dated as of June 9, 2014;

     -- holders of those certain Subordinated Convertible Notes
        due March 9, 2020, issued by AGI Holdco and Aerogroup
        International pursuant to that certain Purchase Agreement
        dated as of Jan. 20, 2016;

     -- holders of those certain Subordinated on Transferrable
        Notes due March 9, 2020, issued by AGI Holdco.

The Debtors say that cash collateral is their sole source of
funding for operations and the costs of administering these Chapter
11 cases.  Absent authority to use cash collateral immediately, the
Debtors would need to immediately cease operations that would cause
irreparable harm to the Debtors' creditors and their estates.
Thus, the Debtors' immediate access to cash collateral is necessary
to preserve and maximize value for the benefit of all parties in
interest.  Without access to liquidity, the Debtors' ability to
navigate through the Chapter 11 process will be jeopardized to the
detriment of all of the Debtors' stakeholders.  As a result, the
Debtors have an immediate need to use cash collateral to ensure
sufficient liquidity during these Chapter 11 cases.

In exchange for the consensual use of cash collateral, the Debtors
have agreed, and the interim court order provides adequate
protection in the form of, among other things, adequate protection
liens, superpriority claims and adequate protection payments to
protect the Prepetition Secured Credit Parties against any
diminution in the value of their interests in the Prepetition
Collateral resulting from the use, sale or lease of Prepetition
Collateral, the subordination of the Pre-Petition Liens to the
carve-out, and the imposition of the automatic stay.

According to the Debtors, access to the cash collateral on an
interim basis will provide the Debtors with the liquidity necessary
to ensure that the Debtors have sufficient working capital and
liquidity to operate their business while they pursue the
reorganization of their business or the sale of substantially all
of their assets thereby maximizing value for the Debtors' estates
and creditors.

The Debtors warn that without access to liquidity, the Debtors'
ability to navigate through these Chapter 11 cases will be
jeopardized to the detriment of all of the Debtors' stakeholders.
As a result, the Debtors have an immediate need to use cash
collateral to ensure sufficient liquidity during these Chapter 11
cases.

The occurrence of any of the following, among others, will
constitute a termination event unless waived by the Prepetition
Agents in their sole discretion:

     (a) the Debtors will, without the Prepetition Agents' prior
         written consent, file a motion with the Court seeking
         the authority to liquidate any of the Debtors' assets or
         capital stock unless the transactions that are the
         subject of the motions will result in immediate payment
         in full in cash of the Prepetition Obligations;
  
     (b) the filing of any motion or pleading: (A) to obtain
         financing under Section 364(c) or (d) of the U.S.
         Bankruptcy Code; (B) to grant any lien other than
         Prepetition Permitted Liens upon or affecting any
         Prepetition Collateral or Postpetition Collateral; (C)
         except as provided in the interim court order, as the
         case may be, to use Cash Collateral under Section 363(c)
         of the Bankruptcy Code without the prior written consent
         of the Prepetition Agents; (D) that seeks to prohibit the
         Prepetition Secured Credit Parties from credit bidding
         on any or all of the Debtors' assets during the
         pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases; or (E) any other
         action or actions materially adverse to the Prepetition
         Secured Credit Parties or their rights and remedies
         hereunder or their interest in any Prepetition Collateral
         or Postpetition Collateral;

     (c) (A) the filing of any plan of reorganization or
         liquidation or disclosure statement attendant thereto, or
         any direct or indirect amendment to the plan or
         disclosure statement, by the Debtors or any other
         person to which the Prepetition Secured Credit Parties
         do not consent or otherwise agree to the treatment of
         their claims in their sole discretion, (B) the entry of
         any order terminating the Debtors' exclusive right to
         file a plan of reorganization or liquidation, or (C) the
         expiration of the Debtors' exclusive right to file a plan
         of reorganization or liquidation;

     (d) the entry of an order in the Chapter 11 cases confirming
         a plan of reorganization or liquidation that (A) is not
         acceptable to the Prepetition Secured Credit Parties in
         their sole discretion or (B) does not contain a provision

         for irrevocable repayment in full in cash of all of the
         Prepetition Obligations on or before the effective date
         of the plan or plans;

     (e) the entry of an order amending, supplementing, staying,
         vacating, or otherwise modifying the Prepetition
         Documents, this Interim Order, or the Debtors' "first-
         day" cash management order without the written consent of

         the Prepetition Agents or the filing of a motion for
         reconsideration with respect to the interim court order
         or the interim court order or cash management court order

         will otherwise not be in full force and effect;

     (f) on or before 45 days after the Petition Date, the
         Debtors will have failed to file a motion seeking a court
         order extending the time period of the Debtors to assume
         or reject leases to not less than 210 days from the
         Petition Date;

     (g) on or before 70 days after the Petition Date, the Debtors

         will have failed to obtain the entry of the lease
         extension court order;

     (h) on or before Oct. 23, 2017, the Debtors will have failed
         to execute an asset purchase agreement in form and
         substance acceptable to the Prepetition Agents that will
         provide, among other things, for the irrevocable payment
         in full in cash of the Prepetition Revolver Obligations
         and Prepetition Term Loan Obligations upon the closing of

         a sale of substantially all of the Debtors' assets
         pursuant to Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code;

     (i) on or before Oct. 30, 2017, the Debtors will have failed
         to obtain the entry of an order approving bidding and
         auction procedures in connection with the 363 Sale which
         must be in form and substance acceptable to the
         Prepetition Agents in their sole discretion;

     (j) on or before Nov. 15, 2017, the Debtors will have failed
         to conduct an auction with respect to the Debtors'
         assets, unless the Prepetition Agents, in their sole
         discretion, determine that an auction is unnecessary;

     (k) on or before Nov. 22, 2017, the Debtors will have failed
         to obtain the entry of an order approving the 363 Sale;
         and

     (l) on or before Nov. 29, 2017, the Debtors will have failed
         to consummate the 363 Sale.

The Prepetition Secured Credit Parties will be granted valid and
perfected replacement and additional security interests in, and
liens on the Postpetition Collateral.  

Subject to the Section 506(c) Surcharge, the Prepetition Secured
Credit Parties shall be granted an allowed administrative claim
against the Debtors' estates under Section 503(b) of the Bankruptcy
Code with superpriority pursuant to Section 507(b) of the
Bankruptcy Code to the extent that the Adequate Protection Liens do
not adequately protect against any Diminution in Value of the
Prepetition Secured Credit Parties' interests in the Prepetition
Collateral.

The Debtors will pay to the Prepetition Revolver Agent when due all
interest and Letter of Credit Fees (each of which will be payable
at the Default Rate set forth under Prepetition Revolver Credit
Documents), fees (including all fees set forth in any fee letter),
costs, expenses (including professional fees and expenses
(including the attorneys' fees of Choate Hall & Stewart LLP, as
counsel to the Prepetition Revolver Agent, and Womble Carlyle
Sandridge & Rice, LLP, as local counsel to the Prepetition Revolver
Agent), indemnities and other amounts with respect to the
Prepetition Revolver Obligations in accordance with the Prepetition
Revolver Credit Documents.

The Debtors will pay to the Prepetition Term Loan Agent the
reasonable and documented out-of-pocket fees and expenses of the
financial advisors and attorneys of the Prepetition Term Loan
Credit Parties not to exceed the amount set forth in the Budget.

The Debtors will continue to deposit all proceeds of ABL Priority
Collateral into the existing cash management system.  Proceeds of
any disposition or sale of ABL Priority Collateral not in the
ordinary course of business, will be applied directly to the
Prepetition Revolver Obligations until all obligations are paid in
full; provided, that the Store Closing Sales will constitute sales
in the ordinary course of business.

At the end of each week, the Debtors will permit any amounts
remaining in the Debtors' Concentration Account in excess of the
Weekly Budget Payments and Weekly Transfers to be transferred to
the Prepetition Revolver Agent to be applied to the Prepetition
Revolver Obligations.

A copy of the Debtors' Motion is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb17-11962-14.pdf

                   About Aerogroup International

Aerogroup International, Inc. -- http://www.aerosales.com/-- was
established in 1987 through a buyout of the What's What division of
Kenneth Cole.  Doing business as Aerosoles, the company is a New
Jersey-based women's footwear brand offering a wide array of
footwear, including heels, flats, wedges, boots and sandals that
appeal to broad consumer tastes.

With plans to close 74 of 78 stores they are operating, Aerogroup
International, Inc., and five affiliated debtors each filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-11962) on Sept. 15, 2017.

The cases are pending before the Honorable Kevin J. Carey.

Aerosoles disclosed $73 million in assets and $109 million in
liabilities as of the Petition Date.

Aerosoles' legal advisor in connection with the restructuring is
Ropes & Gray LLP.  Berkeley Research Group, LLC, serves as its
restructuring advisor and Piper Jaffray & Co. serves as its
investment banker for the restructuring. Hilco Merchant Resources
is assisting on store closings.

Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent.


ALL-STATE FIRE: Wants To Use WF's Cash & Accounts Receivable
------------------------------------------------------------
All-State Fire Protection, Inc., seeks permission from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado to use cash
collateral to make the premium payments to IPFS Corporation and to
pay The Reliable Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc., as a critical
vendor in the amount of $140,000.

The Debtor has also determined that it should also seek court
approval to use estate property, namely the Debtor's cash and
accounts receivable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 363(b), in order
to pay the post-petition premium payments to IPFS and to pay
Reliable.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., has consented to the use of its cash
collateral.

The Debtor needs immediate use of its cash and accounts receivable
to operate its business and to keep its employees on the jobs.  The
Debtor's business depends upon uninterrupted access to funds that
were held in its accounts necessary to operate, meet payroll, and
fund its other operating expenses necessary to maintaining its
ordinary course of business.  In order to pay its necessary
operating expenses, the Debtor must immediately use funds in which
Wells Fargo Bank may claim a security interest.  In addition, the
Debtor will use its cash and accounts receivable in order to
generate revenue and fund its post-petition operations over the
next few months, including payment to IPFS and Reliable.

Similarly, the Debtor will use cash collateral to generate new
business and accounts receivables during the bankruptcy case.

Absent authorization to use the Debtor's cash and accounts
receivable, the Debtor will be unable to continue its operations
and to proceed with the reorganization of its debts in an orderly
fashion, which could result in a significantly reduced recovery for
the Debtor's estate.  Alternatively, if the Debtor is authorized to
use its cash and accounts receivable, the Debtor will be able to
maximize the value of its estate through the continuation of the
Debtor's business.

The payment Reliable in the amount of $140,000 will be paid within
60 days following court order approving the Debtor's request.  
Such time will permit the Debtor to collect sufficient accounts
receivables to fund the payment.

The Debtor is exploring debtor-in-possession financing with several
lender to further allow the Debtor to manage its operational cash
flow.  To the extent the Debtor obtains financing, the Debtor will
seek approval under 11 U.S.C. Section 364.  In such event, the
Debtor will access the financing funds to also pay Reliable and
IPFS.

Pre-petition, the Debtor obtained insurance for general liability
through Gemini Insurance Company, for Pollution through Lloyd's of
London, and a general umbrella through National Union Fire
Insurance Company of Pittsburgh.  In order to pay the premiums on
Dec. 28, 2016, the Debtor entered into a Premium Finance Agreement
with IPFS to finance the costs.  Under the terms of the Premium
Finance Agreement, the Debtor granted IPFS a security interest in
its insurance policies, including any dividends that may become due
in connection with those policies.  Post-petition, the Debtor
intends to continue to make the monthly installment payments under
the Premium Finance Agreement to secure insurance coverage.

The Debtor will pay the cure payments in addition to regular
monthly payments under Premium Finance Agreement.  The Debtor's
budget for use of cash collateral provides for payment of these
sums.  The insurance policies provide the Debtor with adequate
insurance that is a prerequisite to the Debtor's ability to operate
in Colorado, confirm a plan, and reorganize.  The Debtor seeks
approval of the assumption nunc pro tunc to June 23, 2017, the
Petition Date.

As IPFS is extending credit to the Debtor post-petition under the
Premium Finance Agreement, the Debtor also seeks approval of the
Agreement under 11 U.S.C. Section 364(c).  IPFS will consent to
assumption of the Premium Finance Agreement.  

Reliable is the Debtor's primary supplier of parts for installation
into the Debtor's projects.  Reliable asserts that it is owed a
total of $841,056.94 from the Debtor for goods purchased and
delivered.  The Debtor says it depends on obtaining supplies and
materials from Reliable for its use.  Reliable offers the Debtor
its materials with a discount because of the large volume purchased
by the Debtor and on favorable repayment terms.  Other suppliers do
not offer the Debtor generous discount or payment terms.  

Post-petition, Reliable has offered to extend the Debtor the same
pricing and payment terms.  As a condition to agreeing to provide
payment terms to the Debtor post-petition, Reliable has requested
that the Debtor pay all of its Reclamation Claim as well as an
additional $54,259.20 towards past due sums.  

The Debtor is also working with several of its customers, including
Shaw Construction, to obtain payment on jobs where Reliable's
materials were incorporated.  The Debtor believes that it is owed
approximately $188,000 from Shaw Construction for Reliable's
materials on several jobs and a combined total of
$841,056.94 on all jobs.  As the Debtor obtains payment from its
customers, including Shaw Constructions, on projects for which
Reliable is owed funds, the Debtor will pay the respective pre- and
post-petition amounts to Reliable under Colorado's Mechanic's Trust
Fund Statute, C.R.S. Section 38-22-127 (2016).  The funds are not
property of the Debtor or the estate, but rather funds held in
trust for the benefit of subcontractors and suppliers.

Reliable and Debtor have agreed to enter into a Vendor Trade
Agreement.  Among other things, the terms of Vendor Trade Agreement
will limit the account balance for new product supplied by Reliable
not to exceed $50,000 at any given time.  Moreover, as a condition
precedent to Reliable's acceptance of a purchase order submitted by
Debtor, the General Contractor on the project for which the product
ordered is to be supplied, must approve the purchase order and
agree to a joint check agreement.

A copy of the Debtor's request is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob17-15844-122.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Aug. 11, 2017, the
Debtor, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Wells Fargo Equipment Finance,
Inc., filed a motion asking the Court to authorize the Debtor's use
of cash collateral, saying that the Debtor needs immediate use of
its cash and accounts receivable to operate its business and to
keep its employees on the jobs.  The Debtor stated that to the
extent Wells Fargo and WFEF are properly perfected secured
creditors, they are entitled to adequate protection of their
interests in the pre-petition collateral, including the operating
funds, the bank collateral, and Equipment, in an amount equal to
the aggregate post-petition diminution in value of the pre-petition
collateral, including without limitation, any diminution resulting
from the sale, lease or use by the Debtor of the prepetition
collateral and the imposition of the automatic stay.

                 About All-State Fire Protection

All-State Fire Protection, Inc., based in Wiggins, Colo.,
specializes in the installation of fire sprinkler systems for
residential and commercial clients.

All-State Fire Protection filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Colo. Case No. 17-15844) on June 23, 2016, estimating $1 million to
$10 million in assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed by
Raymond Gibler, president.

The Hon. Thomas B. McNamara presides over the case.  

Kenneth J. Buechler, Esq., at Buechler & Garber, serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


AMERICAN POWER: $500,000 Loan Maturity Extended to Oct. 2017
------------------------------------------------------------
American Power Group, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of American
Power Group Corporation, and Iowa State Bank, entered into a Change
of Terms Agreement, pursuant to which the maturity of APG's
$500,000 Revolving Line of Credit was extended from Sept. 14, 2017,
to Oct. 14, 2017, as disclosed in a Form 8-K report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

                   About American Power Group

American Power Group's alternative energy subsidiary, American
Power Group, Inc. -- http://www.americanpowergroupinc.com/--
provides a cost-effective patented Turbocharged Natural Gas
conversion technology for vehicular, stationary and off-road mobile
diesel engines.  American Power Group's dual fuel technology is a
unique non-invasive energy enhancement system that converts
existing diesel engines into more efficient and environmentally
friendly engines that have the flexibility to run on: (1) diesel
fuel and liquefied natural gas; (2) diesel fuel and compressed
natural gas; (3) diesel fuel and pipeline or well-head gas; and (4)
diesel fuel and bio-methane, with the flexibility to return to 100
percent diesel fuel operation at any time.

American Power reported a net loss available to common stockholders
of $10.40 million on $1.86 million of net sales for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2016, compared to a net loss available to common
stockholders of $1.04 million on $2.95 million of net sales for the
year ended Sept. 30, 2015.  

As of June 30, 2017, American Power had $5.82 million in total
assets, $12.08 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $6.26 million.

Schechter Dokken Kanter Andrews & Selcer, Ltd., in Minneapolis,
Minnesota, issued a "going concern" qualification on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Sept. 30,
2016, citing that the Company has suffered recurring losses from
operations and has a net capital deficiency that raises substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


AMERICAN POWER: Fails to Comply with OTC Market Bid Price Rule
--------------------------------------------------------------
American Power Group Corporation was notified by the OTC Markets
Group on Sept. 18, 2017, that the bid price of the Company's common
stock has closed below $0.01 for more than 30 consecutive calendar
days and no longer meet the Standards for Continued Eligibility for
OTCQB as per the OTCQB Standards, Section 2.3(2), which states that
the Company must maintain proprietary priced quotations published
by a Market Maker in OTC Link with a minimum closing bid price of
$.01 per share on at least one of the prior 30 consecutive calendar
days.

Per Section 4.1 of the OTCQB Standards, the Company will be granted
a cure period of 90 calendar days during which the minimum closing
bid price for the Company's common stock must be $.01 or greater
for ten consecutive trading days in order to continue trading on
the OTCQB marketplace.  If this requirement is not met by Dec. 17,
2017, the Company will be removed from the OTCQB and moved to the
OTCPINK.  In addition, in the event that the Company's closing bid
price falls below $0.001 at any time for five consecutive trading
days, the Company will be immediately removed from OTCQB and moved
to the OTCPINK.

                 About American Power Group

American Power Group's alternative energy subsidiary, American
Power Group, Inc. -- http://www.americanpowergroupinc.com/--
provides a cost-effective patented Turbocharged Natural Gas
conversion technology for vehicular, stationary and off-road mobile
diesel engines.  American Power Group's dual fuel technology is a
unique non-invasive energy enhancement system that converts
existing diesel engines into more efficient and environmentally
friendly engines that have the flexibility to run on: (1) diesel
fuel and liquefied natural gas; (2) diesel fuel and compressed
natural gas; (3) diesel fuel and pipeline or well-head gas; and (4)
diesel fuel and bio-methane, with the flexibility to return to 100
percent diesel fuel operation at any time.

American Power reported a net loss available to common stockholders
of $10.40 million on $1.86 million of net sales for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2016, compared to a net loss available to common
stockholders of $1.04 million on $2.95 million of net sales for the
year ended Sept. 30, 2015.  As of June 30, 2017, American Power had
$5.82 million in total assets, $12.08 million in total liabilities
and a total stockholders' deficit of $6.26 million.

Schechter Dokken Kanter Andrews & Selcer, Ltd., in Minneapolis,
Minnesota, issued a "going concern" qualification on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Sept. 30,
2016, citing that the Company has suffered recurring losses from
operations and has a net capital deficiency that raises substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


AMERIFLEX ENGINEERING: Has Until September 29 to Circulate Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas M. Renn of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Oregon extended Ameriflex Engineering LLC's exclusivity period
for filing a Chapter 11 Plan and Disclosure Statement to and
through October 31, 2017.

Judge Renn held that the Debtor is prohibited from filing a chapter
11 plan until it has complied with the circulation of its plan and
disclosure statement consistent with LBR 3017.1-1 and waited 14
days thereafter.  The judge said the Debtor must circulate the plan
and disclosure statement no later than Sept. 29.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor asked the Court to extend the exclusivity periods to January
12, 2018.  The Debtor explained that roughly two weeks after filing
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on March 22, 2017, it
initiated an adversary proceeding against creditor Michael Zoller.
In that action, the Debtor sought to mandatorily subordinate Mr.
Zoller's claim.  Unable to negotiate a resolution of that matter,
on June 21, the Debtor filed a motion for summary judgment, and Mr.
Zoller subsequently filed a cross-motion for summary judgment.  A
hearing on the motion was held on Aug. 28, but was placed under
advisement.  The Debtor said the Court's decision regarding the
pending motions will not be issued until after the expiration of
the exclusivity period.

The Debtor said Mr. Zoller holds a claim totaling $1.5 million or
roughly 60% of the Debtor's total liabilities. As such, the Court's
decision regarding Mr. Zoller's claim will materially alter the
Debtor's proposed plan. Although the Debtor intends to file a plan
of reorganization and disclosure statement prior to the expiration
of the exclusivity period, that plan may need to be amended
depending on the Court's ruling on the Adversary Proceeding.

The Debtor also said its financial expert, R. Kim Short, has been
preparing plan projections that will pay a significant percent of
all allowed claims or possibly even pay them in full with the
exception of Mr. Zoller's claim.  However, if administrative costs
continue to grow due to the opposition of Mr. Zoller, the Debtor
believed that there would be a serious risk that the Debtor will
have to decrease its proposed plan payments.

Based on Mr. Short's projections, the Debtor believed that it will
be able to file its plan and disclosure statement before the
expiration of the exclusivity period. The Debtor claimed that it
may need to amend its plan and disclosure statement once the court
issues its decision regarding the pending Adversary Proceeding. The
Debtor assured the Court that it will also continue to work on
negotiating with all creditors to determine if a resolution of all
disputes is possible so a consensual plan of reorganization can be
confirmed.

                   About Ameriflex Engineering

Ameriflex Engineering LLC -- http://rhboats.com/and
http://fishrite-boats.com/-- is engaged in the design, development
and manufacturing of boats.  The Company was created in 2008 with
the acquisition of the assets of then struggling River Hawk Boats,
Inc.  Cajon, Inc. and Pacific Diamond & Precious Metals each own
50% membership interest in the Debtor.

The Debtor filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Or. Case No.
17-60837), on March 22, 2017. The petition was signed by Pacific
Diamond & Precious Metals, Inc., member. At the time of filing, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities between $1 million and $10
million.

The case is assigned to Judge Thomas M. Renn.  The Debtor hired
Tara J. Schleicher, Esq., at Farleigh Wada Witt, as bankruptcy
counsel; Ball Janik LLP as special counsel; and Cramer & Associates
as accountant.

No trustee, examiner or committee has been appointed.


AMPLIPHI BIOSCIENCES: Closes Issuance of 551.9K Common Shares
-------------------------------------------------------------
As previously disclosed, on April 8, 2016 AmpliPhi Biosciences
Corporation entered into a Common Stock Issuance Agreement (CSIA)
with certain former holders of the Company's Series B convertible
preferred stock.  Pursuant to Section 3 of the CSIA, the Company
agreed to issue a formula-based number of shares of its common
stock to the Holders for no additional consideration upon
completion of one or more bona fide equity financings in which the
Company sells shares of its common stock below a specified price in
a transaction that occurs prior to the earlier of June 30, 2018, or
such time as the Company has raised, following the date of the
CSIA, $10.0 million in the aggregate.  In each of June 2016,
November 2016 and May 2017, the Company completed offerings of its
common stock that constituted Dilutive Issuances under the CSIA.
Due in part to limitations on the number of shares issuable to the
Holders under the rules of the NYSE MKT, no additional shares of
common stock were issued to the Holders in connection with the
November 2016 or May 2017 offerings.

The Company and the Holders entered into an amendment to the CSIA
to, among other things, terminate the Price Protection Obligations.
In consideration for the termination of the Price Protection
Obligations and a release of claims by the Holders, the Company
agreed to (i) issue to the Holders, within five business days of
the Amendment, an aggregate of 28,684 shares of its common stock,
which, under the rules of the NYSE MKT, is the maximum number of
shares the Company is permitted to issue to the Holders pursuant to
the CSIA without further shareholder approval, and (ii) issue to
the Holders in a subsequent closing an aggregate of 523,210 shares
of common stock, subject to obtaining shareholder approval of the
Second Issuance at the Company's 2017 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and the Company's receipt of a release of claims from
the Holders at the time of the Second Issuance.

The First Issuance was completed on June 29, 2017.  On Sept. 7,
2017, the Company's shareholders approved the Second Issuance.  The
Company received a release of claims from each of the Holders and
completed the Second Issuance on Sept. 19, 2017.

                        About AmpliPhi

AmpliPhi Biosciences Corp. is a biotechnology company focused on
the discovery, development and commercialization of novel phage
therapeutics.  Its principal offices occupy 1,000 square feet of
leased office space pursuant to a month-to-month sublease, located
at 3579 Valley Centre Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, California.  It
also leases 700 square feet of lab space in Richmond, Virginia,
5,000 square feet of lab space in Brookvale, Australia, and 6,000
square feet of lab and office space in Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Ampliphi reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$24.27 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net
loss attributable to common stockholders of $10.79 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of June 30, 2017, AmpliPhi had $15.10
million in total assets, $5.24 million in total liabilities and
$9.86 million in total stockholders' equity.

Ernst & Young LLP, in San Diego, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the Company has recurring
losses and negative cash flows from operations that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


ANTERO MIDSTREAM: S&P Affirms 'BB' CCR on Good Credit Metrics
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it has affirmed its 'BB' corporate
credit rating on Antero Midstream Partners L.P. The outlook remains
stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we revised our recovery rating on the
partnership's senior unsecured notes to '3' from '4'. The '3'
recovery rating indicates our expectation that lenders will receive
meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 65%) recovery in the event
of a payment default.

"Our 'BB' corporate credit rating on Antero Midstream Partners L.P.
(Antero Midstream) reflects our fair assessment of the
partnership's business risk profile and our intermediate assessment
of its financial risk profile. Antero Midstream is a publicly
traded MLP created by exploration and production (E&P) company
Antero Resources Corp. to own, operate, and develop its midstream
assets in the Marcellus and Utica shale formations. Specifically,
Antero Resources Corp. owns approximately 53% of Antero Midstream
Partners L.P.'s units and has dedicated substantially all of its
current and future acreage to the partnership under long-term fixed
fee gathering compression and water services contracts. Antero
Midstream receives the vast majority of its volumes from Antero
Resources Corp. in relatively concentrated areas in the Marcellus
and Utica shale formations. We view Antero Midstream as
strategically important to Antero Resources Corp.

"The stable outlook on Antero Midstream reflects our expectation
that the partnership will continue to increase its volumes as
Antero Resources' production grows. We anticipate that the
partnership will sustain adjusted debt-to-EBITDA of about
2.50x-2.75x over the next year while maintaining adequate
liquidity. In addition, we expect Antero Midstream Partners L.P. to
maintain healthy distribution coverage of about 1.3x over the next
year.

"We could lower our ratings on Antero Midstream if we lowered our
ratings on Antero Resources Corp.

"Specifically, we could lower the ratings if Antero Resources
Corp.'s cash flow expectation weakened significantly below our
current expectations, such that FFO to debt fell below 12% with no
near-term remedy. Given our current forecast for Antero Resources
Corp. and its favorable hedge position, we consider such a decline
unlikely over the next 12 months. We could also consider a lower
rating if Antero Resources Corp. pursued a more aggressive
financial policy that resulted in a deterioration of credit
measures.

"In addition, we could lower our ratings on Antero Midstream if we
lowered our stand-alone credit profile (SACP) on the partnership.
For example, we could lower our SACP on the partnership if its
debt-to-EBITDA increased above 4x on a sustained basis. This could
occur if Antero Midstream adopts a more aggressive financial
profile or undertakes a debt-financed acquisition that is not
financed in a balanced manner.

"Although unlikely in the near-term, we could raise our ratings on
Antero Midstream if we raised our ratings on Antero Resources Corp.
and raised our SACP on the partnership.

"Specifically, we could raise the ratings on Antero Resources if it
improved its financial profile by maintaining FFO to debt of
greater than 30% on a sustained basis and bringing capital spending
more in line with internally generated cash flows.

"Furthermore, we could raise our SACP on Antero Midstream if the
partnership increased the size, scale, and diversity of its
business or adopted a more conservative financial profile that
causes its debt-to-EBITDA remain below 2x on a sustained basis."


ARIZONA FUNDRAISING: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on September 22 disclosed in a court
filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Arizona Fundraising Solutions
Inc.

              About Arizona Fundraising Solutions

Arizona Fundraising Solutions, Inc., d/b/a Apex Fun Run RUN AZ,
based in Scottsdale, Ariz., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Ariz. Case No. 17-10016) on August 25, 2017.  In its petition, the
Debtors estimated $0 to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  The petition was signed by Christopher J.
Stewart, president.  The Hon. Paul Sala preside over the case.
Randy Nussbaum, Esq., and Wesley Denton Ray, Esq., at Sacks Tierney
P.A., serve as bankruptcy counsel.


ART & DENTISTRY: Hires David E. Lynn as Bankruptcy Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Art & Dentistry, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Maryland to employ David E. Lynn, P.C.,
as counsel to the Debtor.

Art & Dentistry requires David E. Lynn to:

   a. give the Debtor legal advice with respect to its powers
      and duties as Debtor and Debtor-in-Possession in the
      continued management of its property and operation of
      its business;

   b. prepare on behalf of the Debtor necessary complaints,
      applications, answers, orders, reports, schedules,
      statement of financial affairs and other legal papers;

   c. take the necessary steps to stay any action by
      creditors seeking liens, attachments or other
      advantages by legal process or nonjudicial process;

   d. negotiate and prepare a Disclosure Statement and Plan
      of Reorganization; and

   e. perform all other legal services for the Debtor which
      may be necessary.

David E. Lynn will be paid at the hourly rate of $425. The firm
presently has a credit balance of $6,212.90. The firm will also be
reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

David E. Lynn, partner of David E. Lynn, P.C., assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

David E. Lynn can be reached at:

     David E. Lynn, Esq.
     DAVID E. LYNN, P.C.
     15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 465 North
     Rockville, MD 20850
     Tel: (301) 255-0100
     E-mail: davidlynn@verison.net

                   About Art & Dentistry, LLC

Art & Dentistry, LLC -- http://www.artanddentistry.com-- is a
dental services organization with offices in Bethesda, Potomac,
Rockville, and Washington DC. The Company's services include family
and general dentistry, CEREC one-visit crowns, traditional
orthodontics, cosmetic dentistry, invisalign clear braces,
porcelain veneers, teeth whitening, dental implants, sedation
dentistry and botox cosmetic and juvaderm.

Art & Dentistry, LLC, based in Bethesda, Maryland, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 17-22579) on September 20,
2017. The Hon. Wendelin I. Lipp presides over the case.  David E.
Lynn, Esq., at David E. Lynn, P.C., serves as bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $100,000 to $500,000 in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities. The petition
was signed by Ellen Brodsky, managing member.


AUTHENTIC GELATO: Oct. 2 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
-------------------------------------------------------------
William T. Neary, United States Trustee for Region 6, will hold an
organizational meeting on Oct. 2, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in the
bankruptcy case of Authentic Gelato, LLC, et al.

The meeting will be held at:

               Office of the U. S. Trustee
               Earl Cabell Federal Building
               1100 Commerce Street, Room 524
               Dallas, Texas 75242

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it
represents.

                           About Authentic Gelato

Authentic Gelato, LLC, together with its affiliates, is in the ice
cream and frozen desserts business.

Authentic Gelato and other related entities sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Tex., Lead Case No. 17-33532) on Sept. 19,
2017.  The petition was signed by Ugo Ginatta, director.  Hon.
Harlin DeWayne Hale is the presiding judge.

Keith Miles Aurzada, Esq. and Michael P. Cooley, Esq. of Bryan Cave
LLP serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.

Authentic Gelato has estimated assets and debts of $1 million to
$10 million.



AVANTOR INC: Fitch Cuts Senior Unsecured Notes Rating to B-/RR5
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded Avantor, Inc.'s senior unsecured notes
to 'B-/RR5' from 'B/RR4'.  

Avantor is acquiring VWR Corporation (VWR); financing for the
transaction includes a $3.151 billion term loan (split into USD and
EUR denominated tranches), $2.099 billion secured notes (split into
USD and EUR denominated tranches), $2 billion in unsecured notes,
$2 billion of senior PIK preferred equity and $1.65 billion of
convertible preferred equity. The company will draw on its revolver
to pay deal expenses.

The downgrade of the senior unsecured notes reflects a change in
the proposed capital structure that increased the size of the
secured borrowings by $266 million and decreased the senior
unsecured notes by $250 million. This increase in the secured debt
amount decreases the recovery prospects for the senior unsecured
note lenders.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Strengthens Positioning, Diversification: Avantor's acquisition of
VWR strengthens the combined entity's portfolio of products and
customer relationships. VWR has solid industry positions supported
by extensive brand recognition and reputation. It also has a highly
diversified portfolio of products and customers within the
laboratory supply market, with $4.6 billion in annual sales.
Although a much smaller company by sales, legacy Avantor helps to
fill VWR's geographic and product and platform gaps.

High Leverage Post Transaction: Reported gross debt to EBITDA will
be high after the transaction. Fitch expects year-end 2018 leverage
of 8.7x, including about $200 million of cost synergies and little
in the way of revenue or commercial synergies. Fitch believes these
cost synergies are achievable, based on the cost structures of the
companies being combined and the past history of both in realizing
cost savings following acquisitions. There will be opportunities to
reduce leverage through term loan prepayments because of good free
cash flow (FCF) generation and an excess cash flow sweep
requirement under the credit agreement, although Fitch expects the
company may direct some cash towards acquisitions, which will limit
the amount repaid on the term loan under the excess FCF sweep
covenant requirement.

Positive and Improving FCF: Low-single-digit organic revenue growth
and incrementally improving pro forma margins should drive
consistently positive annual FCF of roughly $300 million. Despite
Avantor's high leverage, Fitch expects interest coverage to remain
solid for the 'B' rating with operating EBITDA/interest paid of
about 2.5x through the forecast period, even assuming a gradual
increase in interest rates on floating rate over the rating
horizon. Laboratory product distribution, as with most other
distribution businesses, generates relatively low margins. However,
margins benefit from the higher margin Avantor business and VWR's
higher-margin, private-label segment and anticipated integration
synergies. Fitch's forecast incorporates the realization of $220
million of annualized cost synergies by 2019.

Moderate Growth: Fitch expects the combined company to generate
4%-5% organic revenue growth through 2020, driven by
mid-single-digit growth in the Americas and high-single-digit
growth in biopharma. Strong biopharma sales will likely more than
offset the relatively weak performance in academic end-markets.
Foreign currency headwinds continue to partly offset the positive
effect of organic growth. Fitch's ratings case forecast for Avantor
does not include explicit revenue synergies related to the business
combination; this could prove an upside to the forecast in the
later years of the ratings horizon.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

The combination of New Mountain Capital portfolio company Avantor,
Inc. and VWR Corp. creates a global leader in the laboratory supply
market with over $5 billion in annual sales. The strategic
rationale for the business combination is supported by stable
positive FCF generation through consumables- and service-focused
revenues, and enhanced access to biopharma industry customers. The
laboratory supply market has not experienced the same degree of
regulatory or pricing scrutiny as the rest of the healthcare
industry. Favorable business mix and mid single-digit revenue
growth (above traditional laboratory product and supplies industry
due to faster growth Avantor biopharma and biomaterials businesses)
will help to support a high debt burden. Thermo Fisher will be the
combined company's closest peer within the lab products industry.
Thermo Fisher, a direct distribution competitor, is materially
larger than VWR, has an industry-leading manufacturing business,
and is much more conservatively capitalized; Fitch currently rates
the company 'BBB'. Other 'B' rated healthcare companies operating
in different industry sub-sectors typically have rating
sensitivities in the 6.0x to 7.0x gross leverage range. Fitch
assigns a 'B' IDR despite Avantor's higher total debt with equity
credit to EBITDA because the business profile supports an
expectation for consistent and significant FCF generation.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its  ratings case for the issuer
include:

-- 4%-5% organic revenue growth in 2018-2020 periodically
    augmented by small tuck-in type acquisitions;

-- Operating EBITDA margin of combined business stabilizes
    slightly below 19% as cost control, integration synergies and
    favorable mix more than help offset pricing headwinds;

-- FCF consistently positive with FCF margin of slightly less
    than 4% and improving to 6% by 2020, capex equal to 2% of
    revenue; debt reduction balanced with tuck-in acquisitions;

-- Gross debt to EBITDA declining to mid 7x by the end of 2020
    due to a combination of EBITDA growth and a small amount of
    debt repaid through FCF.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

-- Continued operational strength and maintenance of a higher
    level of positive FCF generation sufficient to fund targeted
    acquisitions and significant debt reduction;

-- Substantially achieving all cost synergies associated with the

    VWR acquisition, with leverage trending towards 6.0x.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

-- Increased competitive and/or regulatory operating pressure
    that weighs on sales margin and cash flow generation;

-- Falling meaningfully short of achieving the forecasted cost
    synergies associated with the VWR acquisition;

-- Free cash flow (FCF) sustained below $100 million and
    operating EBITDA/interest paid durably below 2.0x.

LIQUIDITY

Adequate Liquidity: The combined company will have an estimated
$100 million of cash on hand and $200 million availability under a
$250 million accounts receivable facility and $234 million
availability under a $250 million senior secured revolver. Fitch
estimates the combined company will generate more than $300 million
of FCF annually.

Debt Maturities Manageable: The capital structure put in place will
have manageable debt maturities, with only $30 million of annual
term loan amortization.

Equity Credit Assumptions: In calculating leverage metrics for
Avantor, Fitch assigns no equity credit to the $2 billion of senior
PIK preferred equity and 100% equity credit to the $1.65 billion of
convertible preferred equity that are expected to be sources of
funding for the transaction. The $1.65 billion of convertible
equity is assumed to be $2.72 billion given its liquidation
preference of 1.65x the face value of the equity. The convertible
preferred receives 100% equity credit largely because of the lack
of a dividend, while the PIK preferred receive 0% equity credit
because of select covenants.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Avantor Inc.
-- Long-Term Issuer Default Rating at 'B';
-- Senior first lien secured revolver at 'BB'/'RR1/100%';
-- Senior first lien secured term loans at 'BB'/'RR1/100%';
-- Senior first lien secured notes at 'BB'/'RR1/100%'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

Fitch has downgraded the following ratings:

Avantor Inc.
-- Senior unsecured notes to 'B-'/'RR5/28%' from 'B'/'RR4/36%'.


AYTU BIOSCIENCE: Amends 9.8 Million Shares Resale Prospectus
------------------------------------------------------------
Aytu Bioscience, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission an amendment no.1 to its Form S-1 prospectus relating to
the sale or other disposition from time to time of up to 9,844,684
shares of the Company's common stock, $0.0001 par value per share
by certain stockholders, 3,030,014 of which are outstanding and
6,064,670 of which underlie warrants to purchase shares of its
common stock and 750,000 of which underlie convertible preferred
stock.  The Company is not selling any shares of common stock under
this prospectus and will not receive any of the proceeds from the
sale of shares of common stock by the selling stockholder.
However, the Company will receive proceeds for any exercise of
warrants, but not for the subsequent sale of the shares underlying
the warrants.

The shares of common stock being offered by the selling
stockholders have been issued pursuant to the securities purchase
agreement dated Aug. 11, 2017, that the Company entered into with
certain investors.  The prices at which the selling stockholders
may sell the shares will be determined by the prevailing market
price for the shares or in negotiated transactions.

The selling stockholders may sell or otherwise dispose of the
shares of common stock covered by this prospectus in a number of
different ways and at varying prices.

The Company's common stock is listed on the OTCQX Market operated
by OTC Markets Group, Inc. (or OTCQX) under the ticker symbol
"AYTU."  On Sept. 21, 2017, the closing price of the Company's
common stock as reported on the OTCQX was $4.00.

A full-text copy of the Amended Prospectus is available at:

                     https://is.gd/9SBAd8

                     About Aytu Bioscience

Aytu BioScience, Inc. (OTCMKTS:AYTU) -- http://www.aytubio.com/--
is a commercial-stage specialty healthcare company concentrating on
developing and commercializing products with an initial focus on
urological diseases and conditions.  Aytu is currently focused on
addressing significant medical needs in the areas of urological
cancers, hypogonadism, urinary tract infections, male infertility,
and sexual dysfunction.

Aytu Bioscience incurred a net loss of $22.50 million for the year
ended June 30, 2017, compared to a net loss of $28.18 million for
the year ended June 30, 2016.  

As of June 30, 2017, Aytu Bioscience had $14.99 million in total
assets, $10.99 million in total liabilities and $3.99 million in
total stockholders' equity.

"As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company
had a net loss of $22.5 million and net cash used in operations of
$13.8 million, for the year ended June 30, 2017.  At June 30, 2017,
Aytu had $878,000 of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash,
stockholders’ equity of $4.0 million and an accumulated deficit
of $69.1 million at June 30, 2017.  In addition, the Company is in
the early stage of commercialization and has not yet generated any
profits.  These factors raised substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern," the Company
stated in its Annual Report for the year ended June 30, 2017.


BIOSCRIP INC: Britt Jeffcoat Departs as VP Controller and CAO
-------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Britt C. Jeffcoat's last day with BioScrip, Inc., was Sept. 22,
2017.  As previously reported by BioScrip, Mr. Jeffcoat and the
Company agreed that he would step down from his position as vice
president, controller and chief accounting officer of the Company.


                        About Bioscrip

Headquartered in Denver, Colo., BioScrip, Inc., is a an independent
national provider of infusion and home care management solutions,
with approximately 2,500 teammates and nearly 80 service locations
across the U.S. BioScrip partners with physicians, hospital
systems, payors, pharmaceutical manufacturers and skilled nursing
facilities to provide patients access to post-acute care services.
BioScrip operates with a commitment to bring customer-focused
pharmacy and related healthcare infusion therapy services into the
home or alternate-site setting.  By collaborating with the full
spectrum of healthcare professionals and the patient, BioScrip
provides cost-effective care that is driven by clinical excellence,
customer service, and values that promote positive outcomes and an
enhanced quality of life for those it serves.

BioScrip incurred a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$50.59 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net
loss attributable to common stockholders of $309.51 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  

As of June 30, 2017, Bioscrip had $613.4 million in total assets,
$600 million in total liabilities, $2.63 million in series A
convertible preferred stock, $74.22 million in series C convertible
preferred stock and a total stockholders' deficit of $63.48
million.

                           *    *    *

In August 2017, Moody's Investors Service affirmed BioScrip, Inc.'s
'Caa2' Corporate Family Rating.  BioScrip's 'Caa2' CFR reflects the
company's very high leverage and weak liquidity.

In July 2017, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'CCC' corporate
credit rating on BioScrip Inc. and removed the rating from
CreditWatch, where it was placed with negative implications on Dec.
16, 2016.  The outlook is positive.  "The rating affirmation
reflects our view that, although BioScrip addressed its upcoming
maturities by refinancing its senior secured credit facilities and
improved its liquidity position, the company's credit measures will
remain weak in 2017 with debt leverage of about 14x (including our
treatment of preferred stock as debt) and funds from operations
(FFO) to debt in the low single digits.  We expect the company to
use about $15 million - $20 million of cash in 2017, inclusive of
cash charges associated with restructuring following the recently
announced United Healthcare contract termination."


BLACK IRON: Allowed to File Reorganization Plan Until January 27
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge William T. Thurman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Utah extended the exclusive period during which Black
Iron, LLC may file a plan of reorganization or liquidation through
January 27, 2018, as well as the exclusive period during which the
Debtor may solicit acceptances of the plan through March 28, 2018.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor requested the Court to extend the Plan Proposal Period and
the Plan Solicitation Period, contending that the complex issues
and contentious nature of the legacy litigation demonstrate the
need for additional time for the Debtor to consult and negotiate
with the parties.  The Debtor told the Court that it has spent
substantial time since the Petition Date addressing the complex
legacy and pending litigation.

The Debtor said it has taken steps to remove or refer to the Court
all substantive litigation matters relating to its estate and
assets within approximately the first 60 days of the bankruptcy
filing.  As such, the Debtor anticipated that it will continue to
make significant progress toward completing a consensual
restructuring and emerging from chapter 11 with improved
operations. Because there has been little time since the Petition
Date, the Debtor believed that this factor favors the requested
extension.

                      About Black Iron LLC

Black Iron, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Utah Case No. 17-24816) on June 1, 2017.
Steve L. Gilbert, its manager, signed the petition. At the time of
the filing, the Debtor estimated its assets and debts at $1 million
to $10 million.

Judge William T. Thurman presides over the case.

The Debtor is represented by Adelaide Maudsley, Esq. and Ralph R.
Mabey, Esq. at Kirton McConkie P.C. The Debtor tapped Hires Gary
Thorup, Esq. at Durham Jones to serve as its special litigation
counsel; WSRP, LLC as its accountant; and Alysen Tarrant as its
environmental consultant.


BLACK MOUNTAIN GOLF: Plan Exclusivity Period Moved Until Jan. 31
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Bruce T. Beesley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada has extended the exclusivity period for which
Black Mountain Golf & Country Club may file a Plan of
Reorganization through January 31, 2018.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor asked the Court to extend its exclusive periods to file and
confirm its plan of reorganization through January 31, 2018, and
May 31, 2018, respectively.

The Debtor told the Court that it is seeking an extension to
conduct discovery in the Adversary Proceeding, Shawn Lampman v.
Black Mountain Golf & Country Club, et al., Adv. Case No.
17-01178-btb and litigate that matter.

The Debtor said the primary assertion in the Lampman Adversary
Proceeding is that Mr. Lampman claims 25% of any proceeds of the
sale of the Debtor's Property based upon an alleged oral contract
between the Debtor and Mr. Lampman.

On August 8, 2017, the Court has entered its Order on the Debtor's
Motion for Summary Judgment, and scheduled the same for November 9.
If by that date the case is not yet resolved, the trial is
scheduled for December 7 to 8.

The Debtor believed that resolution of the Lampman Adversary
Proceeding will substantially impact in crafting a successful Plan
of Reorganization.

In addition, the Debtor claimed that additional time would also be
appropriate given that the time frame for pursuing its applications
with both the City of Henderson and the Bureau of Land Management
are likely to take (at least) several months.

Approximately 140 of the 178 acres owned by the Debtor have been
subject to a reversionary interest of the Bureau of Land
Management. In addition, the Debtor leases a 2.2 acre parcel from
the City of Henderson pursuant to a 5-year $1 per year lease
(executed in 1990 and subject to a fifty year renewal option).

The Debtor also told the Court that it continues work to have
certain reversionary interests on its property to be removed. The
Debtor's repurchase application with the BLM has progressed
significantly as the BLM has approved the appraisal of the BLM
Property at $30.8 million.

The Debtor said it has begun the process with the City of Henderson
to request rezoning -- which is also a multi-stage process,
involving multiple submissions, review by the City, preparation of
ancillary documents, neighborhood meetings, and consideration by
the City Council.

Consequently, the Debtor contended that it has a meeting scheduled
with both the City and the BLM on October 5.

            About Black Mountain Golf & Country Club

Based in Henderson, Nevada, Black Mountain Golf & Country Club is a
member-owned golf facility open to the public.  The Company is
non-profit corporation and a tax-exempt entity.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 17-11540) on March 30, 2017.  The
petition was signed by Larry Tindall, president.  At the time of
the filing, the Debtor estimated its assets at $10 million to $50
million and debts at $1 million to $10 million.

The case is assigned to Judge Bruce T. Beesley.  Morris Polich &
Purdy LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.  The Debtor employed
Coffey & Rader CPA as its accountant and Harper Appraisal, Inc., as
appraiser. The Debtor hired Ray Fredericksen of Per4mance
Engineering in connection with its efforts to rezone its property.

No request has been made for the appointment of a trustee or
examiner, and no official committees have been appointed in this
Chapter 11 case.


BMW PARTNERSHIP: Ch. 11 Trustee Files Amended Plan of Liquidation
-----------------------------------------------------------------
BMW Partnership, LLP, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Alabama a disclosure statement to accompany
the Chapter 11 Trustee's amended plan of liquidation, dated Sept.
15, 2017.

Under the latest plan, the Trustee will abandon his interests in
the properties that are subject to a first mortgage in favor of
Wells Fargo Bank. The Trustee will assign his interest in the
Sherie Frei loan to Federated Mutual Insurance Company, holder of
an unavoidable judgment lien, in addition to payment of $15,000 to
Federated, which will have no unsecured claim.

The Trustee will pay allowed administrative expense claims,
including the commissions and expenses of the Trustee and the fees
and expenses of Silver Voit and RTBH. The Trustee will use the
remaining funds to first pay all allowed priority claims, which
consist of ad valorem taxes, and then to make a single pro rata
distribution to the holders of allowed unsecured claims with any
remaining funds.

The partners' interests in the Debtor will be terminated, and once
these actions are complete, the Trustee will dissolve the Debtor
entity.

The previous version of the Trustee's plan only asserted that the
Trustee will abandon his interests in properties, which are subject
to a first mortgage in favor of Wells Fargo Bank. The Chapter 11
Trustee will assign his interest in the Sherie Frei loan to
Federated Mutual Insurance Company. The Chapter 11 Trustee will use
all funds he is presently holding to pay allowed administrative
expense claims, and then to make a single pro rata distribution to
the holders of allowed unsecured claims. The partners' interests
will be terminated.  After all of these actions have been
completed, the Chapter 11 Trustee will dissolve the Debtor entity.

A full-text copy of the Latest Disclosure Statement is available
at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/alsb12-02056-892.pdf

                    About BMW Partnership

The creditors filed an involuntary petition against BMW
Partnership, LLP, for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code
on June 13, 2012, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Alabama.  An order for relief was entered by consent.
The case was converted to Chapter 11.  D. Parker Sweet is the
Chapter 11 Trustee.  The Chapter 11 case is BMW Partnership, LLP,
Case No. 12-02056 (Bankr. S.D. Ala.).


BRIGGS DEVELOPMENT: Hires Access Realty as Real Estate Broker
-------------------------------------------------------------
Briggs Development & Property Management, LLC, seeks authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia to
employ Access Realty Atlanta, LLC, as real estate broker to the
Debtor.

Briggs Development requires Access Realty to sell the real property
located at 714 Metropolitan Parkway, S.W., Atlanta, GA 30310.

Access Realty will be paid a commission of 10% of the sales price.

Tywona Speller, member of Access Realty Atlanta, LLC, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Access Realty can be reached at:

     Tywona Speller
     ACCESS REALTY ATLANTA, LLC
     PO Box 390594
     Snellville, GA 30039
     Tel: (404) 969-2237

              About Briggs Development & Property
                        Management, LLC

Briggs Development & Property Management LLC, a company based in
Atlanta, Georgia, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 17-59993) on June 5,
2017.  Kevin Jerome Briggs, Sr., president, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets and liabilities of less than $1 million.


BUFFETS LLC: Court Grants Greenberg Traurig's Fee Application
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Ronald B. King of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Texas granted Greenberg Traurig, LLP's fee application
for compensation and reimbursement of expenses for representing the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed in the Chapter
11 cases of Buffets, LLC, and its affiliates for the period
covering March 22, 2016, to May 17, 2017.

Greenberg charged a blended hourly rate of $525 regardless of each
attorney's individual hourly rate, in order to provide its services
at a discount. Greenberg's application requested $2,200,485 in fees
and $87,005.04 in reimbursable expenses. Greenberg provided monthly
reports of fees and expenses incurred, as well as a breakdown of
the hours worked by each professional during the time of
representation.

On August 1, 2017, both the U.S. trustee and the Reorganized
Debtors (through their new special counsel) objected to Greenberg's
final fee application. The Reorganized Debtors generally asserted
that Greenberg's fees were excessive, unreasonable, costly to the
estate, and for largely unnecessary work. The Reorganized Debtors
requested a fee reduction of between $741,204.13 and $787,118.59.

After careful consideration of the efforts undertaken by Greenberg,
the actions of Debtors' counsel that necessitated a higher workload
for Committee's counsel, the agreement with the U.S. trustee, and
the discount provided to the estate, Judge King finds Greenberg's
fees to be reasonable. Greenberg requests compensation for actual,
necessary services rendered and expenses incurred amidst a
time-pressured, labor-intensive, complex case. The fees are
appropriate for the representation provided.

Accordingly, the Reorganized Debtors' Objection is overruled, the
U.S. trustee's Objection has been withdrawn, and Greenberg's fee
application is granted, less the agreed-upon reduction of $50,000.

A full-text copy of Judge King's Opinion dated Sept. 18, 2017, is
available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb16-50557-2826.pdf

                    About Buffets LLC

Buffets LLC, et al., are one of the largest operators of
buffet-style restaurants in the U.S.  The buffet restaurants,
located in 25 states, principally operate under the names Old
Country Buffet(R), Country Buffet(R), HomeTown(R) Buffet, Ryan's(R)
and Fire Mountain(R).  These locations primarily offer self-service
buffets with entrees, sides, and desserts for an all-inclusive
price.  In addition, Buffets owns and operates an 10-unit full
service, casual dining chain under the name Tahoe Joe's Famous
Steakhouse(R).

Buffets Holdings, Inc., filed for Chapter 11 relief in January 2008
and won confirmation of a reorganization plan in April 2009.  In
January 2012, Buffets again sought Chapter 11 protection and
emerged from bankruptcy in July 2012.

On Aug. 19, 2015, Alamo Ovation, LLC acquired Buffets Restaurants
Holdings, Inc., and as a result of the merger, Buffets operated
over 300 restaurants in 35 states.

Down to 150 restaurants in 25 states after closing unprofitable
locations, Buffets LLC and its affiliated entities sought Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. Lead Case No. 16-50557) in
San Antonio, Texas, on March 7, 2016.  The cases are assigned to
Judge Ronald B. King.

The Debtors have tapped John E. Mitchell, Esq., David W. Parham,
Esq., Andrea Hartley, Esq., Esther A. McKean, Esq., and Amy M.
Leitch, Esq., at Akerman, LLP as counsel; Bridgepoint Consulting,
LLC as financial advisor; and Donlin, Recano & Company as claims
and noticing agent.

The United States Trustee, on March 21, 2016, appointed the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  The Creditors'
Committee has retained Greenberg Traurig, LLP, as its counsel and
FTI Consulting, Inc., as its financial advisor.

On April 27, 2017, the Court confirmed the Debtors' Second Amended
Joint Plan of Reorganization.  The Effective Date of the Plan was
May 18, 2017.


CALIFORNIA RESOURCES: S&P Affirms 'CCC+' CCR, Outlook Negative
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'CCC+' corporate credit rating on
Los Angeles-based exploration and production company California
Resources Corp. The outlook is negative.

California Resources continues to contend with high debt levels and
onerous interest costs that limit near-term improvement in
financial measures and liquidity, S&P noted.

S&P said, "At the same time, we raised the issue-level rating on
the company's senior unsecured notes to 'CCC-' from 'D'. The
recovery rating remains '6', indicating our expectation of
negligible (0%-10%; round estimate: 0%) recovery in the event of a
payment default.

"The 'B' issue-level and '1' recovery ratings on the company's
first-lien debt are unchanged. We are affirming the 'CCC+'
issue-level rating on the company's senior secured second-lien
notes and revising the recovery rating to '3' from '4'. The '3'
recovery rating indicates our expectation of meaningful (50%-70%;
rounded estimate: 60%) recovery in the event of a payment default.

"The affirmation of the 'CCC+' corporate credit rating on
California Resources Corp. (CRC) reflects our assessment of the
company's improving, but still weak financial measures combined
with increased capital spending that should stem production
declines following a tumultuous 2016. Nevertheless, we expect debt
leverage to remain very high, above 7x, with no near-term catalyst
for significant improvement under our base case assumptions,
including $50 per barrel West Texas Intermediate (WTI)and Brent
crude oil through 2018.

"Additionally, we expect liquidity to remain tight and that CRC
will need to address its financial covenants in 2018. This combined
with diminished expectations of available liquidity to cover
expected cash uses led us to lower our assessment of the company's
liquidity to less than adequate from adequate.

"The negative outlook reflects CRC's high debt levels leading to
debt leverage that we consider unsustainable, as well as
uncertainty about covenant compliance in 2018. High interest costs
combined with less-than-adequate liquidity are also key factors on
ratings and will limit the potential for improvement over the next
12 months.

"We could lower ratings within the next six to nine months if CRC
fails to proactively address potential covenant violations.
Additionally, we could lower ratings if we assessed CRC's liquidity
as weak or we expected interest coverage to fall below 1x. Both
scenarios are likely within the next 12 months if crude oil prices
fall significantly below our price assumptions.

"We could return the rating outlook to stable if CRC can address
the 2019 maturity of its first-lien first-out term loan and credit
facility while improving debt leverage toward 5x and addressing
covenant compliance issues.

"We expect that meaningful debt leverage improvement would require
crude oil prices to average above our base case assumptions or for
CRC to complete a material asset sale that is used to repay debt."


CAPITOL STATION: Unsecured Non-Priority Claims to Get 100% in 36Mos
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Capitol Station 65, LLC, and affiliates filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania a first
amended disclosure statement for their first amended joint plan of
reorganization, dated Sept. 12, 2017.

Class 1(a) Unsecured Non-Priority Claims (excluding assumed
contracts) -- totaling $1,571,157 -- will be paid in full at 6.5%
interest over 36 months.  The repayment period may be shorter if
the Court approves use of DIP loan to pay Class 1(a) claims, or out
of proceeds of unencumbered assets.

On the Effective Date, all assets of the Debtors and the Debtors'
Estate will re-vest in the Debtors free and clear of all liens,
claims, or interests, except to the extent such lien, claim, or
interest is preserved through a specific provision of the Plan.
The Debtors will be entitled to operate their business and dispose
of its assets free of any restrictions or limitations contained in
11 U.S.C. Sections 345, 361, 363, 364, 365, and 366, and Rule 9019
of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.  Entry of the
confirmation court order will discharge the Debtors from all debts
that arose prior to confirmation to the fullest extent permitted by
11 U.S.C. Sec. 1141(d).

The Plan incorporates and approves the Anthem Sale Agreement, and
authorizes the Debtors to enter into and perform all obligations
under the Anthem Sale Agreement.  Title to all Parcels sold to
Anthem under the Anthem Sale Agreement will be conveyed free and
clear of any liens asserted by Copia and the holders of claims in
Classes 5(a), 5(b), and 5(c).

The Debtors will be authorized to sell any parcel to a Buyer free
and clear of any liens asserted by Copia and the holders of claims
in Classes 5(a), 5(b), and 5(c), subject to distribution of the
proceeds of Parcel sales in accordance with Articles 4.1,
4.4 and 4.5 of the Plan.  All transfers of Parcels under this Plan
(including the Anthem Sale Agreement) will be exempt from taxes to
the extent provided in 11 U.S.C. Section 1146(a).

On the Effective Date, all agreements between the Debtors and Copia
which form the basis of Copia's Class 4 Claim, and all rights of
Copia thereunder will be cancelled.  Thereafter, the agreements
will be of no force and effect, and Copia's rights under the
agreements will be replaced by the rights conferred upon it by this
Plan.

A copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/caeb17-23627-106.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Sept. 5, 2017, the
Debtors filed with the Court a disclosure statement for its joint
plan of reorganization, dated Aug. 28, 2017, which proposed to
restructure Copia Lending, LLC's loan to allow the Debtors the time
to negotiate sales to individual builders to develop projects
within Township Nine consistent with existing entitlements and the
master development plan.

              About Capitol Station 65, LLC

Capitol Station 65 LLC, Capitol Station Holdings LLC, Capitol
Station Member LLC, and Township Nine Owners LLC sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case Nos.
17-23627 to 17-23630) on May 30, 2017.  Suneet Singal, its chief
executive officer, signed the petitions.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors estimated their assets at
$50 million to $100 million and debts at $10 million to $50
million.

Judge Christopher D. Jaime presides over the cases.  Nuti Hart LLP
serve as the Debtors' legal counsel.

On July 20, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee hired
Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby & Pascuzzi LLP, as counsel.


CARLSON TRAVEL: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative & Affirms 'B' CCR
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it revised its outlook on U.S.-based
business travel company Carlson Travel Inc (CTI) to negative from
stable and affirmed its 'B' long-term corporate credit rating on
the company.

S&P said, "At the same time, we affirmed our 'B' issue rating on
CTI's senior secured notes. The '4' recovery rating on the notes
remains unchanged, indicating our expectation of average (30%-50%;
rounded estimate: 45%) recovery in the event of payment default.

"We also affirmed our 'CCC+' issue rating on the senior second-lien
notes. The '6' recovery rating remains unchanged, indicating our
expectation for negligible (0%-10%; rounded estimate: 0%)
recovery.

"The negative outlook reflects the risk that the challenging market
conditions CTI has continued to face during the first half of 2017
could persist, exerting downward pressure on EBITDA margins and
hindering the group's efforts to reduce leverage. Specifically, we
continue to view the company as susceptible to the effects of
softer energy prices, its ongoing shift to online bookings, and
foreign exchange volatility, all of which have been detrimental to
the topline and EBITDA during the past three years. Additional
pressure on profitability comes from the significant restructuring
costs that the company is incurring due to the strategic transition
to become a predominantly digital travel management company. In the
first half of 2017, the group posted a 2% revenue decline to around
$713 million with reported EBITDA falling by almost 40% to around
$47 million (EBITDA adjusted for restructuring costs fell by 8% to
around $89 million).

"Over the past three years, CTI Group's profitability was mostly
hindered by topline declines. If the topline doesn't stabilize, we
expect CTI's profitability to remain hampered over at least the
next couple of years mostly due to continuing investments in
development of the digital platform on the one hand, and
restructuring of its offline division on the other. That said, we
expect S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margins to be around 10%,
which is below our previous forecast of around 13%. We also view
the travel industry as fragmented, highly competitive, cyclical,
and exposed to event risks. The company will continue to face
pricing pressure from its customers and competitive pressures from
online agencies and other business travel operators (including the
main competitors such as American Express Global Business Travel
and BCD Travel). These risks are mitigated, to an extent, by the
group's strong brand, solid position in the niche business travel
segment, and its good relationships with suppliers (including
airlines, hotels, and ground transportation providers), broad
geographical diversification, and sustainably high customer
retention rates of about 95%.

"Our view of CTI's highly leveraged capital structure is a key
constraint for the rating. We expect 2017 credit metrics to be
weak, with debt to EBITDA remaining elevated at about 9x on an S&P
Global Ratings-adjusted basis (compared with 7.5x in 2016) and free
operating cash flow (FOCF) to remain materially negative. This is
predominantly due to investment in software development and
restructuring of existing business, as CTI implements its strategic
decision to move its business from offline to digital in the coming
years. However, we expect the company to improve its operating
performance and credit metrics toward 2018-2019, mainly coming from
topline growth."

In S&P's base case, it assumes:

-- GDP growth in main markets (U.S. and Europe) should support
demand fundamentals for CTI given that business travel is generally
tied to economic growth.

-- Global GDP growth, excluding China, forecast at 3.1% in 2017
and 2018, with U.S. GDP growing by 2.2%-2.3% and eurozone GDP by 2%
in 2017 and 1.7% in 2018.

-- Revenue growth of between -2% and +2% in 2017-2018, as CTI's
average transaction price stabilizes and transaction growth
resumes, albeit to levels below global GDP growth.

-- Given the recurring nature and the necessity of these costs to
maintain the competitive advantage, S&P considers the group's
restructuring costs as an operating expense and exclude them from
our EBITDA computation.

-- S&P forecasts restructuring costs of about $60 million for 2017
and $45 million for 2018.

-- Adjusted EBITDA margin of 9%-10% in 2017-2018 pressured by
restructuring costs.

-- Capital expenditure (capex) of $65 million-$70 million, with
the majority being the investment in the technology platform.

-- No shareholder returns.

Based on these assumptions, S&P arrives at the following credit
metrics:

-- Adjusted debt to EBITDA of above 9.0x in 2017, declining below
9x in 2018;

-- Absent exceptional restructuring costs, we calculate adjusted
debt to EBITDA to be above 7.0x in 2017, declining below 7x in
2018;

-- Funds from operations (FFO) to debt of 2%-5% through 2018;

-- Adjusted EBITDA interest coverage of around 1.6x in 2017 and
1.7x in 2018; and

-- Negative FOCF in 2017 improving toward 2018.

S&P said, "The negative outlook reflects our belief that over the
next 12 months, challenging industry conditions could persist,
which could hinder the effect of management's turnaround efforts,
causing operating results to underperform our base-case
expectations. Competition in the travel industry will likely remain
elevated as companies compete aggressively for market share. If the
company is unable to drive traffic and sales to the extent the
margins and cash flows are restored, leverage will remain at levels
that are no longer commensurate with the current rating.

"We could lower our ratings on CTI if the company's operating
results continue to deteriorate due to heightened competitive
activity or an inability to execute on its strategic repositioning
initiatives. Under this scenario, transactions and net sales growth
would remain negative and the S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA
margin will continue to decline, depressed by restructuring costs
and investments in development of technology platform. If adjusted
EBITDA interest cover remains below 2.0x over the next 12 months
and FOCF remains materially negative for a prolonged period,
depressed by high capex and restructuring costs, we could also
lower the rating. Similarly, if CTI were to pursue a more
aggressive policy with regard to shareholder returns or
acquisitions, or if we saw a significant weakening in liquidity or
tightening covenant headroom, this could also result in a negative
rating action.

"We could revise our outlook to stable if the company improves its
operating performance by achieving sound positive sales and
adjusted EBITDA growth, as well as EBITDA margin improvement. Under
this scenario, adjusted EBITDA interest coverage would be well
above 2.0x on a sustainable basis, and the company would generate
modest levels of positive free cash flow."



CATHEDRAL HILL: May Use Up To $135K in Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. William J. Fisher of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Minnesota has granted Cathedral Hill Hospitality Inc.
permission to use up to $135,130 in cash collateral.

A final hearing on the Debtor's request will be held on Oct. 3,
2017, at 10:00 a.m.

For purposes of adequate protection, and only to the extent of cash
collateral used, the Debtor is authorized to grant any creditor
having an interest in cash collateral a replacement lien in the
Debtor's post-petition assets of the same type and nature as
subject to the prepetition liens.  The liens will not include any
Chapter 5 Causes of Action.  The liens will have the same priority
and affect as such lien creditors held on the prepetition property
of the Debtor, and are granted only to the extent of the diminution
in value of such creditors' interest in prepetition collateral.

As additional adequate protection, the Debtor will (a) maintain
insurance on all of the property in which any secured creditor
having a lien in cash collateral (and all other secured creditors)
claims a security interest; (b) pay all post-petition federal and
state taxes, including timely deposit of payroll taxes; (c) provide
the cash collateral creditors (and all other secured creditors,
upon reasonable notice), access during normal business hours for
inspection of their collateral and the Debtor's business records;
and (d) deposit all cash proceeds and income into a Debtor in
Possession Account.  The replacement liens of the secured creditors
are deemed properly perfected without any further act or deed on
the part of the Debtor or the creditor.

A copy of the Order is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/mnb17-32895-7.pdf

                About Cathedral Hill Hospitality

Cathedral Hill Hospitality Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Minn. Case No. 17-32895) on Sept.
12, 2017, estimating assets and liabilities of less than $500,000.
Judge William J. Fisher presides over the case.  Thomas J. Flynn,
Esq., at Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd., serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


CINCINNATI BELL: S&P Rates New $350MM Senior Unsecured Notes 'B-'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned a 'B-' issue-level rating and '5'
recovery rating to Cincinnati-based telecom service provider
Cincinnati Bell Inc.'s proposed $350 million of senior unsecured
notes due 2025. (CB Escrow Corp. is the borrower of the notes.) S&P
said, "We also affirmed the 'B-' issue-level rating on the
company's existing senior unsecured debt and removed it from
CreditWatch, where we placed it with negative implications on Aug.
9, 2017. The recovery rating remains '5', indicating our
expectation for modest (10% to 30%; rounded estimate: 20%) recovery
in the event of payment default."

The affirmation follows the company's announcement that it will use
proceeds from the $350 million senior unsecured note offering to
fund the remainder of its acquisition of Hawaiian Telcom Holdco
Inc. The negative CreditWatch was based on the potential that
issuance of additional senior secured debt to bridge the remaining
portion of the company's acquisition financing could have resulted
in lower recovery and issue-level ratings for the senior unsecured
debt issues.

S&P said, "Our 'B' corporate credit rating and stable outlook on
Cincinnati Bell are unchanged. Pro forma for the acquisitions of
Hawaiian Telcom and OnX Enterprise Solutions (which are scheduled
to close in the second half of 2018 and fourth quarter of 2017,
respectively), we expect that adjusted leverage will remain in the
5x area, which is modestly higher than our previous expectation of
leverage in the high-4x area in 2017. Still, we expect modest
deleveraging over the next 12 months from EBITDA growth and some
synergies such that adjusted leverage will decline to our base-case
expectation of the mid- to high-4x area in 2018."

Ratings List

  Cincinnati Bell
   Corporate Credit Ratings                 B/Stable/--

  Rating Affirmed; Credit Watch Action; Recovery Rating Unchange

                                            To        From
  Cincinnati Bell Inc.
   Senior Unsecured Notes due 2024          B-        B-/CW Neg
    Recovery Rating                         5(20%)    5(25%)

  Rating Assigned; Recovery Rating

  CB Escrow Corp.
   $350 mil sr unsecured Notes due 2025     B-
    Recovery Rating                         5(20%)


CLUB VILLAGE: Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to Nov. 20
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Paul G. Hyman, Jr., of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida has extended, at the behest of Club
Village, LLC, the exclusivity period to file a plan of
reorganization and disclosure statement by 90 days through and
including Nov. 20, 2017, and solicit acceptances to the plan for 90
days through and including Jan. 22, 2018.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Aug. 28, 2017, the
Debtor said the Court entered an Order Granting Motion to Approve a
Compromise between the Debtor and its Secured Lender.  Currently,
the Debtor claims that it is still analyzing claims to determine
various treatments and whether a plan will in fact be needed, or
whether the Debtor will seek voluntary dismissal.

                          About Club Village

Club Village, LLC, a single asset real estate business based in
1601 NW 13 St., Boca Raton, Florida, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 16-21497) on Aug. 22, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Fred DeFalco, managing member.  The case is
assigned to Judge Erik P. Kimball.  The Debtor disclosed total
assets at $11.5 million and total debts at $11.2 million.

The Debtor is represented by Aaron A. Wernick, Esq., at Furr &
Cohen.  The Debtor engaged Andrew Sodl, Esq., at Akerman LLP as
special counsel; and Paul Rubin, EA, Mtax and Rubin & Associates,
CPA Firm, PA, as accountants.

No trustee, examiner or statutory committee has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.


COLLEGE PARK: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor affiliates that filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions:

     Debtor                                    Case No.
     ------                                    --------
     College Park Investments, LLC             17-22678
     7302 Yale Avenue
     College Park, MD 20740
     Tel: 410-953-0222
     Fax: 410-953-0223

     Stein Properties, Inc.                    17-22680
     Suite 207
     8600 Snowden River Parkway
     Columbia, MD 21045

Business Description: Each of College Park Investments and
                      Stein Properties is in the real estate
                      leasing and rentals business.  College Park
                      Investments' principal assets are located  
                      at 7302 Yale Avenue College Park, MD 20740.
                      Stein Properties owns a real property
                      at 10840 Little Patuxent Parkway Columbia,
                      MD 21045-1982.
                      
Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 22, 2017

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Maryland

Judges: Hon. David E. Rice (17-22680)
        Hon. Thomas J. Catliota (17-22678)

Debtors' Counsel: Lawrence A. Katz, Esq.
                  HIRSCHLER FLEISCHER PC
                  8270 Greensboro Drive, Suite 700
                  Tysons, VA 22102
                  Tel: 703-584-8362
                  Fax: 703-584-8901
                  E-mail: lkatz@hf-law.com

College Park's Assets: $1 million to $10 million
College Park's Debt: $1 million to $10 million

Stein Properties' Assets: $1 million to $10 million
Stein Properties' Debt: $10 million to $50 million
                                    
The petitions were signed by Bruce S. Jaffe, manager.  Full-text
copies of the petitions are available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb17-22678_petition.pdf
        http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb17-22680_petition.pdf

College Park's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb17-22678.pdf

Stein Properties' list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb17-22680.pdf


CONTOURGLOBAL LP: Fitch Hikes Long-Term IDR to BB-; Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded ContourGlobal L.P.'s (CGLP) Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'BB-' from 'B+'. The Rating Outlook
is Stable. In addition, Fitch has upgraded ContourGlobal Power
Holdings S.A.'s (CGPH) senior secured notes due 2021 to 'BB/RR3'
from 'BB-/RR3' and affirmed super senior revolver at 'BB+/RR1'.
CGPH is a financing subsidiary of CGLP and the ratings of its debt
obligations primarily benefit from a guarantee from CGLP.

The upgrade reflects increased scale and diversification of CGLP's
portfolio of generating assets and Fitch's expectation that average
credit metrics for the parent company will be in the line with the
'BB-' rating in 2018-2020. Completion of several projects under
construction and improved financial flexibility contributed to the
upgrade.

Additionally, the upgrade incorporates Fitch's expectations that
CGLP will execute its future capital financing plans with greater
predictability and visibility, especially the financing of recourse
debt. In the last two years, CGLP opportunistically issued sizeable
recourse debt before a specific use of proceeds was identified, a
credit concern. As CGLP continues to define and adhere to its
target capital structure and credit metrics, Fitch expects the
opportunistic behaviour to improve.

Maintaining more than 51% equity ownership in the Kosovo power
plant project could impair CGLP's credit quality due to the risks
involved including country risk and counterparty risk if not
mitigated by guaranties from third parties.

The individual security ratings are notched based on a recovery
analysis that reflects the IDR and the priority ranking of the debt
obligations in a hypothetical default scenario.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Larger and More Diversified Asset Base: CGLP managed to grow and
diversify its portfolio of power generation assets since September
2015 when Fitch assigned a first time 'B+' IDR to the company.
Generation capacity grew by about 15% to 4.1GW, EBITDA by about
50%, while EBITDA share from top three assets reduced to 37% from
55%. This was due to completion of several construction projects
(mainly wind farms in Brazil and thermal plant in Senegal) and
acquisitions (mainly cogeneration and hydro power plants in
Brazil). At the same time, generation portfolio diversification by
fuel type has improved to 59% thermal, 41% renewables from 66% and
34% respectively.

Relatively Stable Earnings Supported By Long-Term Contracts: CGLP's
IDR primarily reflects its relatively stable earnings from
long-term contracts and regulated earnings which account for about
95% of total revenue between 2017 and 2022. CGLP owns and operates
69 power generation assets in 19 countries and three continents.
Proportionate EBITDA split is 51% Europe, 37% LatAm and 15% Africa.
Power purchase agreements (PPAs) have a weighted average life of
approximately 12 years. PPAs are either capacity-based which covers
fuel cost and other variable costs or with fixed long-term prices
with inflation pass-through. This results in low volatility of cash
flows. 39% of the off-takers by EBITDA are investment grade, 42%
are in the 'BB' rating category, and the remaining 18% are either
rated 'B+' or below or are unrated. The share of non-investment
grade off-takers without political risk insurance (PRI) reduced to
3% in 2017 from 12% in 2015 reducing CGLP's exposure to high credit
risk projects.

Capital Planning: The rating upgrade incorporates Fitch's
expectations that CGLP will execute its future capital financing
plans with greater predictability and visibility, especially at the
parent level. In the last two years, CGLP opportunistically issued
sizeable recourse debt before a specific use of proceeds was
identified, a credit concern. As CGLP continues to define and
adhere to its target capital structure and credit metrics, Fitch
expects the opportunistic behaviour to improve.

Long-term Recontracting Risks: PPAs for 45% of the total capacity
will expire before 2025 if they are not extended which include two
largest contracts, Maritsa's PPA expiring in 2024 and Arrubal's in
2021. If the weak wholesale power prices and capacity were to
continue in Europe, management indicated that some contracts could
become shorter in tenure such as Maritsa contract or could possibly
become fully merchant such as Arrubal. To manage its recontracting
risk CGLP has recently extended the Sochagota PPA in Colombia two
years ahead of expiration. The company also expects that its
Austria Wind projects will soon receive new feed-in-tariffs for 12
years through repowering projects, two of which have already been
confirmed. The company's average remaining contract term is
currently 12 years.

Kosovo Project: The planned 500MW lignite power plant project in
Kosovo is a source of credit concern due to the large size, long
construction period and a weak counterparty. Fitch understand from
the company that the current plan is for CGLP to own a 51% equity
stake in the project and sell a 49% share to a partner. This would
result in lower than previously expected impact on the company's
overall portfolio - the Kosovo project would account for about 10%
of EBITDA at the time of completion in 2022.

Project is estimated to cost about EUR1.3 billion. Management has
publicly indicated that it intends to raise about 70% project debt.
The off-taker of the PPA is expected to be Kosovo Energy
Corporation (KEK, an entity owned by the Kosovo Government; not
rated). To mitigate the counterparty risk, CGLP has committed that
the project will be backed by investment grade off-taker
guarantees. There will be also full EPC construction protection.
Additionally, the gradual and small commitment of equity investment
through 2019 alleviates risks in the near to intermediate term.
Fitch notes that CGLP has experience in building projects in
developing countries. Fitch will closely monitor the progress of
the project and its impact on CGLP's credit quality.

Credit Metrics Supporting Upgrade: The upgrade reflects Fitch's
expectation that average credit metrics for the parent company will
be in the line with the 'BB-' rating in 2018-2020. On a parent-only
cash flow basis, Fitch projects that the recourse debt/APOCF
(available parent-only cash flow) will likely average 3.8x in
2018-2020, which is within Fitch's guideline for the rating upgrade
to 'BB-' from 'B+'.

Improved Flexibility Allows for Moderate Dividends: CGLP paid its
first dividend to shareholders in April 2017 ($54 million), 12
years after the company's creation. If cash flows from operating
subsidiaries are below expectations Fitch expects the company to
make appropriate changes in the equity investment plans and planned
dividends in order to keep leverage commensurate with the 'BB-'
rating.

Recovery Analysis: The 'BB+/RR1' ratings for CGPH's super senior
revolver and 'BB/RR3' for its senior secured notes are based on
Fitch's recovery waterfall analysis. The 'RR1' rating for the
revolver reflects outstanding recovery prospects given default with
securities historically recovering 91%-100% of current principal
and related interest and reflects a two-notch positive differential
from CGLP's 'BB-' IDR. The 'RR3' rating for the senior secured
notes reflects a one-notch positive differential from the 'BB-' IDR
and indicates good recovery of principal and related interest of
between 51%-70%.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Fitch rates CGLP based on a deconsolidated approach. The company's
portfolio comprises assets financed using non-recourse project debt
and equity. CGLP's closest peers are AES Corporation (BB-/Stable)
and Nextera Energy Partners (NEP, BB+/Stable). CGLP has a smaller,
less diversified portfolio of assets than AES. While CGLP uses
political risk insurance to protect its investments, it is
potentially exposed to greater geopolitical risks than AES. More
than 80% of AES's distributions are from regulated utilities and
contracted power generation assets. CGLP's recourse debt/APOCF
ratio is expected to be stronger than that of AES, offsetting the
higher business risks. CGLP has a longer average duration of PPA
contracts - about 12 years compared with six years in the case of
AES - and a higher percentage of contracted revenue. NEP's
portfolio of generation assets in terms of capacity is currently
similar in size as CGLP. However, Fitch views NEP's predominantly
U.S. renewable and pipeline assets as being superior with 18 year
remaining contract life.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its ratings case for the issuer
(parent company only projections) include:

-- Equity investments totalling about USD450 million for existing

    assets and new projects in 2018-2020.

-- The Kosovo project funded with about 70:30 debt to equity
    split. Total capex for the project is EUR1.3 billion. CGLP to
    own 51% of the project's equity and the remaining 49% owned by

    a third party. Debt of the project to be raised by the project

    company.

-- Dividends from CGLP to the shareholders starting from 2017.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action:

After the upgrade, Fitch sees limited potential for a positive
rating action due to the company's scale, contract portfolio and
diversification. However, on a parent-only basis, recourse
debt/APOCF substantially below 3x on a sustained basis and
APOCF/interest higher than 5x may be positive for the rating.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action:

-- On a parent-only basis, recourse debt/APOCF above 4x on a
    sustained basis and APOCF/interest lower than 3x;

-- Unpredictable recourse debt financing;

-- If the major PPAs experience unexpected and material price
    reduction or termination;

-- If more than 40% of total revenue becomes uncontracted;

-- A change in strategy to invest in more speculative, non-
    contracted assets or material decline in cash flow from
    contracted power generation assets;

-- If future projects, including the Kosovo project, experience
    material cost overruns and delays, are not prudently financed
    and/or encounter substantial political interference, causing
    financial distress at the project level and/or at the parent
    level such that CGLP breaches the guideline ratios
    aforementioned on a sustained basis;

-- If CGLP's involvement in the Kosovo power plant project is
    substantially larger than currently expected by Fitch.

LIQUIDITY

Sufficient Liquidity: Liquidity is sufficient with $146 million
cash on balance sheet at the parent company at end-June 2017 and
undrawn RCF upsized to EUR50 million from $30 million in September
2017. CGLP also had $235 million of cash at asset level at end-June
2017. According to Fitch projections, CGLP parent company is able
to fund its operations and equity investments with internal cash
flow until at least 2019.

CGLP relies on external funding to execute its growth strategy.
Non-recourse secured project financing is the primary source of
funding.

At the corporate level, since CGLP was founded in 2005, it only
began to access capital market in 2014. CGPH issued $400 million
senior secured notes in 2014 and $100 million senior secured notes
in 2015. In 2016, it issued EUR600 million senior secured notes
mostly to refinance the $500 million senior secured notes. This has
allowed the parent company to extent debt maturities to 2021 from
2019 and lower funding costs. In February 2017, the company issued
a tap EUR100 million bond.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

CGLP
-- Long-Term IDR upgraded to 'BB-' from 'B+'.

CGPH
-- Senior secured revolver affirmed at 'BB+/RR1';
-- Senior secured debt upgraded to 'BB/RR3' from 'BB-/RR3'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


CORNERSTONE APPAREL: Taps SierraConstellation as Financial Advisor
------------------------------------------------------------------
Cornerstone Apparel, Inc. d/b/a Papaya Clothing, seeks authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of
California to employ SierraConstellation Partners, LLC as its
financial advisor.

Professional services required of SierraConstellation are:

     a. evaluate the Debtor's near-term business plan/financial
forecast;

     b. evaluate and/or assist in developing four-wall
(store-level) contribution analysis;

     c. assist with evaluating store footprint and store closure
scenarios;

     d. perform analysis of current inventory composition;

     e. evaluate and/or assist in developing a liquidation
analysis;

     f. provide advice on restructuring alternatives, including but
not limited to, any asset sales or a plan of reorganization;

     g. render  other restructuring, general business consulting or
other assistance as may be requested; and

     h. assist in the preparation of a plan of reorganization.

Winston Mar, a Partner and Managing Director of SierraConstellation
Partners, LLC, attests that SCP does not hold or represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor or the Debtor's estate, and SCP is a
"disinterested person" as that term is defined in Section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

SCP's fees are:

     Winston Mar as
          Engagement Principal      $595/hour
     Jeff Nerland as
          Senior Director           $450/hour
     Director                       $300/hour to $375/hour
     Senior Associates              $200/hour to $300/hour
     Admin Staff                    $100/hour

The Advisor can be reached through:

      Winston Mar
      SIERRACONSTELLATION PARTNERS LLC
      400 South Hope Street, Suite 1050
      Los Angeles, CA 90071
      Phone: 213 289 9060
      Fax: 213 232 3285
      Email: info@sierraconstellation.com

                   About Cornerstone Apparel Inc.

Cornerstone Apparel, Inc., which operates a chain of apparel stores
under the name Papaya Clothing, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-17292) on June 15, 2017. The
petition was signed by Tae Y. Yi, president. The Debtor estimated
assets of $1 million to $10 million and debt of $10 million to $50
million.

Papaya Clothing -- http://www.papayaclothing.com/-- caters to
teens, juniors and the "young at heart", and focuses on the 16 to
25 year old age group.  Papaya is headquartered in Commerce,
California, and had a workforce of 1,300 employees at the time of
the bankruptcy filing.  As of June 15, 2017, Papaya owned and
operated more than 80 retail stores located shopping centers and
malls throughout the United States.

Judge Vincent P. Zurzolo presides over the case.  Levene, Neale,
Bender, Yoo & Brill L.L.P. represents the Debtor as bankruptcy
counsel.  The Debtor hired the Law Offices of Steven C. Kim &
Associates as its special counsel.


CRYOPORT INC: Deregisters 2 Million Unsold Common Shares
--------------------------------------------------------
Cryoport, Inc. previously filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission a Registration Statement on Form S-1, which was
initially filed on March 25, 2015, and became effective on July 23,
2015.  The 2015 Registration Statement was previously amended
pursuant to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the 2015 Registration
Statement, which was filed as a combined prospectus with a
Registration Statement on Form S-1 initially filed on
June 30, 2016, and which became effective on Aug. 10, 2016.

The Company filed a post-effective amendment No. 4 to Form S-1 on
Form S-3 to:

    * convert the 2015 Registration Statement on Form S-1 to Form
      S-3; and

    * maintain the registration of 1,640,401 shares of the
      Company's common stock issuable upon the exercise of the
      remaining outstanding warrants originally registered
      pursuant to the 2015 Registration Statement.

The Company is continuing the registration of the offer and sale of
the Registered Warrant Shares pursuant to the 2015 Registration
Statement, as further amended by this Post-Effective Amendment No.
4, and not pursuant to the 2016 Registration Statement.  In
addition, concurrently with the filing of the Post-Effective
Amendment No. 4 to the 2015 Registration Statement, the Company is
separately filing Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the 2016
Registration Statement to deregister 2,016,809 unsold shares of the
Company's common stock that were previously registered to permit
the resale by certain selling stockholders.

                         About Cryoport

Lake Forest, Calif.-based CryoPort, Inc. (OTC BB: CYRX) --
http://www.cryoport.com/-- provides comprehensive solutions for
frozen cold chain logistics, primarily in the life science
industries.  Its solutions afford new and reliable alternatives to
currently existing products and services utilized for
bio-pharmaceuticals and biologics, including in-vitro
fertilization, cell lines, vaccines, tissue and other commodities
requiring a reliable frozen solution.

The Company's management recognizes that the Company will need to
obtain additional capital to fund its operations until sustained
profitable operations are achieved.  Additional funding plans may
include obtaining additional capital through equity and/or debt
funding sources.

In its report on the consolidated financial statements of Cryoport
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, KMJ Corbin & Company LLP, in
Costa Mesa, California, issued a "going concern" opinion citing
that the Company has experienced recurring operating losses from
inception and has used substantial amounts of working capital in
its operations.  Although the Company has cash and cash equivalents
of $4.5 million at Dec. 31, 2016, management has estimated that
cash on hand will only be sufficient to allow the Company to
continue its operations through the third quarter of calendar year
2017.  These matters, the auditor said, raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Cryoport reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$15.05 million on $5.88 million of revenues for the year ended
March 31, 2016.  For the nine months ended Dec. 31, 2016, Cryoport
reported a net loss of $10.40 million.  As of June 30, 2017,
Cryoport had $17.19 million in total assets, $2.16 million in total
liabilities and $15.02 million in total stockholders' equity.


DAVID FOTHERGILL: Hiffeo Buying Lee's Summit Property
-----------------------------------------------------
David R. Fothergill asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Missouri to authorize the sale of real property
commonly described as 10305 Windsor Drive, Lee's Summit, Missouri,
legally described as Lot 34, Windsor 3rd Plat, Jackson County,
Missouri, to Hiffeo Investments, Inc. in exchange for the payment
of the amount owed to the holder of the First Deed of Trust.

The case has been reopened upon the Debtor's motion to administer
assets.

The property is no longer necessary to the Debtor's effective
reorganization.  The Debtor has entered into a contract to sell the
residence which he owns to the Buyer free and clear of liens.
Nadine I. Fothergill, the Debtor's wife, consents to the sale.  The
Internal Revenue Service has agreed to discharge its lien.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/David_Fothergill_176_Sales.pdf

The purchase price, with some contribution by Debtor, will pay the
amount owed to the holder of the First Deed of Trust.  No payment
will be made to the holder of the Second Deed of Trust.

At the time of filing of the case, at Confirmation, and presently,
the collateral has less value than the amount owed on the First
Deed of Trust Note.  From the date of filing and presently, the
Note secured by the Second Deed of Trust has been entirely
unsecured.

The Plan provided that a creditor holding a totally under-secured
obligation will not retain its lien.  To deliver clear title to the
purchaser, the Debtor must have an order of the Court approving a
sale free and clear of liens.

The holder of the Second Deed of Trust could be compelled, in a
foreclosure action, to accept a money satisfaction, if any, of its
interest.

The sale would be in the best interests of the Debtor and the
estate.

Counsel for the Debtor:

          Joel Pelofsky, Esq.
          1100 Main, Suite 2850
          Kansas City, MO 64105
          Telephone: (816) 471-5900
          Facsimile: (816) 842-9955
          E-mail: jpelofsky@bdkc.com

David R. Fothergill sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Mo.
Case No. 09-45552) on Nov. 11, 2009.  The Debtor's Plan of
Reorganization was confirmed on Feb. 28, 2011 and the case closed
on Sept. 28, 2011.


DIAZ PROPERTY: Dime Bank to Receive $626 Monthly Over 15 Years
--------------------------------------------------------------
Diaz Property Holdings, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Pennsylvania a disclosure statement
describing its proposed plan of reorganization, dated Sept. 15,
2017.

Class 4 under the plan is the unsecured claim of the Dime Bank. The
Dime Bank holds a second mortgage on the Hamilton Street Property
in the approximate sum of $112,539.57. The Hamilton Street Property
is estimated to have a fair market value of $170,000. Thus, there
is no equity in the Property to secure the second mortgage. This
Class 4 claim will be treated as an unsecured claim and will be
paid without interest over a term of 15 years in equal monthly
installments of approximately $626, commencing 30 days after the
effective date of the Plan. The claim is impaired.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
rents from the Lloyd Circle Property.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb5-17-02134-45.pdf

             About Diaz Property Holdings LLC

Diaz Property Holdings, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 17-02134) on May 23,
2017.  Anthony Diaz, sole member, signed the petition.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities of less than $500,000.


DR. LUIS A. VINAS: Wants to Use Cash for October 2017 Expenses
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Luis A. Vinas, MD PA, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida its sixth cash collateral motion,
seeking for authority to use the cash collateral from Oct. 1, 2017
through Oct. 31, 2017, or such other time the Court may order.

The Debtor intends to use the cash collateral in order to continue
to operate the Debtor's plastic surgery business, to allow for the
recovery of existing accounts receivables and conversion to cash of
existing receivables and for the expenditures of prepetition
receivables and postpetition receipts.  The proposed Budget through
Oct. 31, 2017 reflects total estimated monthly expense of $93,651.


The Debtor believes that Bank United, N.A., may claim an interest
in cash collateral, which the Debtor owes an outstanding amount of
approximately $709,747.

As adequate protection for the use of the cash collateral, the
Debtor will, with the Court's permission, grant Bank United a
continuing lien on cash and other receivables. In addition, by
remaining a going concern, the Debtor anticipates collecting its
existing accounts receivable and will be a benefit to the other
creditors of the Debtor's estate. Finally, the Debtor claims that
it will be able maintain operations and therefore generate new and
future receivables all of which will provide adequate protection
for the use of its cash collateral.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Sept. 7, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/NiOf9H

A copy of the Debtor's Budget is available at https://is.gd/ByTuU8


                 About Dr. Luis A. Vinas, MD PA

Dr. Luis A. Vinas, MD PA, is engaged in the health care business
and is 100% owned by Dr. Luis A. Vinas.  Dr. Vinas is Board
Certified by The American Board of Plastic Surgery.  For over two
decades, Dr. Vinas has been nationally recognized for his surgical
techniques and minimally invasive surgical procedures.  Dr. Vinas
is a plastic surgeon specializing in cosmetic and reconstructive
surgery including facelifts, tummy tucks, breast augmentation,
single-stage breast reconstruction, liposuction, body contouring,
and anti-aging procedures.

Dr. Luis A. Vinas, MD PA, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Case No. 17-14765) on April 17, 2017.  Luis A Vinas, MD,
president and 100% owner, signed the petition.  The Debtor
estimated assets of at least $50,000 and liabilities ranging from
$1 million to $10 million.  

The case is assigned to Judge Paul G. Hyman, Jr.  

The Debtor engaged Nicholas B. Bangos, Esq., at Nicholas B. Bangos,
P.A., as bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor tapped William G.
Shofstall, PA, as special counsel.


DUFF & PHELPS: Moody's Rates $950MM Secured Loans 'B2'
------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed Duff & Phelps Corporation's
B2 corporate family rating (CFR) and assigned a B2 rating to its
proposed $850 million senior secured first lien bank credit
facility and to its proposed $100 million revolving credit
facility. Moody's said the outlook on Duff & Phelps' ratings
remains stable.

Issuer: Duff & Phelps Corporation

-- US$850M 1st Lien Senior Secured Term Loan, Assigned B2

-- US$100M Senior Secured Revolving credit facility, Assigned B2

-- Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B2

Outlook Actions:

-- Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The affirmation of Duff & Phelps' ratings follows the firm's
announced plan to refinance its $670 million senior secured first
lien term loan and $75 million senior secured second lien term
loan. Concurrent with the refinancing, Duff & Phelps plans to pay a
$170 million shareholder dividend, funded by $80 million of cash on
hand with the remainder funded by incremental debt. Following this
transaction, the firm would have increased its debt balance by a
total of $105 million, resulting in a pro forma June 2017 debt
leverage ratio of 6.5x, up from 5.9x before the planned
transaction.

Duff & Phelps expects to arrange the incremental increase to its
term loan based upon terms and conditions that are largely the same
as the ones in effect under its existing term loan.

Moody's said the transaction is credit negative because it
increases leverage, although there will be an extension in loan
maturity to 2024, compared with the existing loans due in 2020 and
2021.

Moody's said Duff & Phelps has produced consistent growth in
revenue and operating profitability, partially attributed to the
success of various acquisitions. Duff & Phelps' credit profile
benefits from diversified service offerings in a range of
countries, with a high level of repeat business, said Moody's.
These strengths provide the firm with relatively stable operating
margins throughout the economic cycle.

Moody's expects that Duff & Phelps will extend its improving
operating performance into the second half of 2017 and in 2018. At
the current organic growth levels, Moody's expects that the deal
will not be upsized and that its debt leverage ratio will slowly
improve, from the pro forma 6.5x level following the transaction,
back to around the 6x level by the end of 2018.

What Could Change the Rating -- Up

* The demonstration of strong and sustainable organic revenue
growth resulting in positive operating leverage and higher
profitability

* Improved debt leverage and debt service capacity by way of a
commitment to debt reduction or improvement in EBITDA leading to a
leverage ratio below 5x

What Could Change the Rating -- Down

* A broad slowdown resulting in deterioration in cash flow
generation leading to a debt/EBITDA ratio above 6x on a sustained
basis

* A further increase in borrowings that would worsen the company's
pro forma debt leverage trajectory

* Evidence of weakening financial flexibility such as through the
maintenance of limited cash balances and/or ongoing utilization of
the company's revolving credit facility

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Securities
Industry Service Providers published in September 2017.


EARTH PRIDE: Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to Jan. 25
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Eric L. Frank of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania has extended, at the behest of Earth Pride
Organics, LLC and Lancaster Fine Foods, Inc., the exclusive period
to file their plan or plans until Jan. 25, 2018, and the exclusive
period during which to solicit acceptances of that plan until March
26, 2018.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Aug. 28, 2017, the
Debtors requested the Court to extend for an additional 120 days
the Debtors' exclusive period to file and solicit acceptances or
rejections of a Chapter 11 plan, to January 25 and March 16, 2018,
respectively.  The Debtor claimed that it would need time to review
the various proofs of claim in order to determine the amount and
character of claims asserted against their estates.

                   About Earth Pride Organics, LLC

Earth Pride Organics, LLC -- http://earthprideorganics.com/-- is a
family owned holding company that includes American Specialty
Foods, Lancaster Fine Foods, EPX Trucking and C.O. Nolt's Bakery
Supply.  Headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, each EPO
subsidiary shares the commonality of specialty food and creates a
vertically integrated organization. Lancaster Fine Foods, Inc. --
http://www.lancasterfinefoods.com-- manufactures and sells food,
offering barbecue sauces, mustards, salsas, marinades, hot sauces,
chutneys, cheese spreads, and other common condiments.

Earth Pride and Lancaster Fine Foods sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case Nos. 17-13816 and 17-13819) on May
31, 2017, each estimating assets and liabilities between $1 million
and $10 million.  The petitions were signed by Michael S. Thompson,
their managing member.

Judge Eric L. Frank presides over the bankruptcy cases.

Paul Brinton Mashchmeyer, Esq., at Maschmeyer Karalis P.C., serves
as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.


EDWARD J. MALIK: Disclosures Approved; Nov. 8 Plan Hearing
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge August B. Landis of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada approved Edward J. Malik, O.D., Chartered and
Associates' second amended disclosure statement describing its
second amended plan of reorganization filed on Sept. 1, 2017.

The deadline for filing objections to confirmation of the Plan is
Oct. 18, 2017, and the Plan Confirmation hearing is set for Nov. 8,
2017.

A Redlined Version of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb16-16872-82.pdf

A Redlined Version of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb16-16872-77.pdf

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb16-16872-62.pdf

                About Edward J. Malik O.D.

Edward J. Malik O.D. Chartered and Associates owns and operates an
optometry practice.  It sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 16-16872) on Dec. 30,
2016.  Edward J. Malik, president, signed the petition.  The Debtor
is represented by Nedda Ghandi, Esq., at Ghandi Deeter Blackham.
At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated $100,000 to $500,000 in
assets and $500,000 to $1 million in liabilities.


ENDLESS SALES: Wants to Use Compass' Cash Collateral Until Nov. 30
------------------------------------------------------------------
Endless Sales, Inc., seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Colorado to use cash and cash equivalents
on an ongoing basis through at least Nov. 30, 2017.

Prepetition, in July 2013 the Debtor entered into a loan agreement
with Compass.  The Debtor subsequently entered into a second loan
transaction with Compass in May 2014, and a third loan with Compass
in October 2014.  The indebtedness owed to Compass is secured by a
first position lien on substantially all of the Debtor's assets,
including its inventory, accounts receivable, cash, and accounts.

The Debtor's assets consist of inventory in the amount of
$1,311,940.87 based on the inventory cost, vehicles in the amount
of $158,325, furniture and fixtures in the amount of $3,500, and
cash and cash equivalents in the amount of approximately
$605,266.01.

The income generated by the Debtor is cash collateral in which
Compass has an interest as a secured creditor.  The Debtor assures
the Court that Compass' secured interest will be adequately
protected in by the Debtor's ongoing replacement of its cash, and
by the value of the Debtor's inventory and equipment.  The Debtor
says it is replacing its cash on a daily basis.  The Debtor's
income is derived from sales of its inventory, and payments for
services provided to customers.  Based on the value of the Debtor's
assets, Compass is significantly oversecured by the value of the
Debtor's assets.

The Debtor tells the Court that to pay necessary operating
expenses, the Debtor must immediately use cash collateral in which
Compass has an interest.  The Debtor proposes to use cash
collateral on an interim basis until the time as the Court
schedules a final hearing on the use of cash collateral.  

The Debtor warns that without the use of cash collateral, the
Debtor will have insufficient funding for business operations.
Therefore, the Debtor's use of cash collateral during the interim
period is necessary to avoid immediate and irreparable harm to the
estate.  With the use of cash collateral, the Debtor will not be
able to pay employees, vendors, and other costs associated with
operating its business.  Without the ability to pay its employees
on an ongoing basis, the Debtor not be able to sustain its
operations.  Additionally, without the ability to continually
replenish its inventory, the Debtor will have no ability to
continue its sales.

In order to provide adequate protection for the Debtor's use of
cash collateral to Compass, to the extent the secured creditor is
properly perfected, the Debtor proposes, among others:

     a. a replacement lien on all post-petition accounts and to
        the extent that the use of the cash collateral results in
        a decrease in the value of the collateral pursuant to 11
        U.S.C. Section 361(2);

     b. adequate protection payments in the amount of $13,950 per
        month to Compass, to be applied pro rata across its three
        secured loans; and

     c. adequate insurance coverage on all personal property and
        adequately insure against any potential loss.

The Debtor intends to propose a Plan of Reorganization within the
next month which will provide for the continuation of the Debtor's
business and payments to its creditors.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob17-11037-154.pdf

                      About Endless Sales

Based in Denver, Colorado, Endless Sales, Inc., is engaged in
buying, refurbishing and reselling used forklifts, and designs and
manufactures its own line of forklifts.  

Endless Sales, which conducts business under the name of Discount
Forklift, Discount Forklift Brokers and Octane Forklifts, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 17-11037) on Feb. 13,
2017.  The petition was signed by Brian Firkins, president.  

The Debtor disclosed total assets of $2.56 million and total
liabilities in the amount of $1.78 million.

The case is assigned to Judge Elizabeth E. Brown.  

The Debtor is represented by Jeffrey S. Brinen, Esq., and Keri L.
Riley, Esq., at Kutner Brinen, P.C.  

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.


ENERGY FUTURE: V. Dotson Suit Not Subject to Automatic Stay
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Timothy D. DeDiusti of the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Oklahoma issued an order declining to stay the
present action captioned VANCE DOTSON, Plaintiff, v. ENERGY FUTURE
HOLDINGS CORP. d/b/a TXU ENERGY, et al., Defendants, Case No.
CIV-17-575-D (W.D. Okla.).

Plaintiff brought the action on May 19, 2017, against 16
defendants, alleging multiple violations of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act.  Before the Court is a Notice of Bankruptcy filed on
June 21, 2017, on behalf of 15 defendants.  TXU Energy Defendants
ask the Court to stay the proceedings with respect to them during
the pendency of bankruptcy proceedings involving Energy Future
Holdings Corporation. Plaintiff filed a response in opposition
asserting primarily that the instant action is not one which could
have commenced prior to EFH's filing of bankruptcy.

Here, Plaintiff has sued 16 defendants for conduct regarding a
consumer debt that allegedly was a result of identity theft.
Plaintiff states that he discovered the false information when he
was denied a mortgage loan and obtained a copy of his credit report
from Defendant Experian on May 5, 2016, and learned that the report
showed a trade line debt for $107.00 to TXU Energy.

Plaintiff alleges in his Complaint that TXU Energy Defendants are
"furnishers of information" within the meaning of the FCRA.
Plaintiff maintains that he initiated the dispute notification
process on May 5, 2016, when he sent letters to TXU Energy
Defendants and Defendant Experian, disputing the trade line debt of
$107.00 and the accuracy of his credit report. Id. Defendant
Experian admits it is a "consumer reporting agency" within the
meaning of 15 U.S.C. section 1681a(p).

Plaintiff also asserts that subsequent to May 5, 2016, Defendant
Experian sent a dispute notification to TXU Energy Defendants
concerning the trade line item in Plaintiff's Experian credit
report. Plaintiff further maintains that TXU Energy Defendants
falsely verified to Defendant Experian that Plaintiff was
personally liable for the disputed debt and the amount was still
due.

Based on the chronology of events as alleged by Plaintiff, the
Court finds that TXU Energy Defendants' conduct giving rise to
Plaintiff's claim occurred post-petition. Plaintiff's claim did not
arise until sometime after May 5, 2016, and the bankruptcy petition
was filed two years before. As such, Plaintiff's claim is not
subject to the automatic stay.

A full-text copy of Judge DeDiusti's Order dated Sept. 19, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/j0nxYN from Leagle.com.

Vance Dotson, Plaintiff, represented by Brian L. Ponder --
brian@brianponder.com -- Brian Ponder LLP.

Vance Dotson, Plaintiff, represented by Tiffany L. Hill --
tiffany@brianponder.com -- Brian Ponder LLP.

TXU Energy Gas Asset Management Company, Defendant, represented by
Lyle R. Nelson, Elias Books Brown & Nelson PC.

TXU Energy Holdings Comapny, Defendant, represented by Lyle R.
Nelson -- lnelson@eliasbooks.com -- Elias Books Brown & Nelson PC.

TXU Energy Industries Company, Defendant, represented by Lyle R.
Nelson, Elias Books Brown & Nelson PC.

TXU Energy Retail Company LP, Defendant, represented by Lyle R.
Nelson, Elias Books Brown & Nelson PC.

TXU Energy Retail Management Company LLC, Defendant, represented by
Lyle R. Nelson, Elias Books Brown & Nelson PC.

TXU Energy Services Comapny, Defendant, represented by Lyle R.
Nelson, Elias Books Brown & Nelson PC.

TXU Energy Services Comapny LLC, Defendant, represented by Lyle R.
Nelson, Elias Books Brown & Nelson PC.

Experian Information Solutions Inc, Defendant, represented by Jimmy
K. Goodman -- jimmy.goodman@crowedunlevy.com -- Crowe & Dunlevy &
William R. Taylor, Jones Day.

TXU Energy Solutions Management Company LLC, Defendant, represented
by Lyle R. Nelson, Elias Books Brown & Nelson PC.

TXU Energy Trading (Canda) Company, Defendant, represented by Lyle
R. Nelson, Elias Books Brown & Nelson PC.

TXU Energy Solutions Company LP, Defendant, represented by Lyle R.
Nelson, Elias Books Brown & Nelson PC.

TXU Portfolio Management Company LP, Defendant, represented by Lyle
R. Nelson, Elias Books Brown & Nelson PC.

TXU Portfolio Optimization Company LLC, Defendant, represented by
Lyle R. Nelson, Elias Books Brown & Nelson PC.

                     About Energy Future

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is a
privately held diversified energy holding company with a portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas.  Oncor, an
80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the largest
regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.  The
Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth.  EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating while
reducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS).

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion.  The Debtors had $42
billion of funded indebtedness as of the bankruptcy filing.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal.  The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor, and
Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring Agreement
are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, as legal
advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor.  The EFH
equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor.  Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for the
second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is represented by
Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and Gregory A.
Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S. Weisfelner, Esq.,
Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq., Jeremy B. Coffey,
Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.

On May 13, 2014, the U.S. Trustee appointed the Official Committee
of TCEH Unsecured Creditors in the Chapter 11 Cases.  The TCEH
Committee is composed of (a) the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation; (b) HCL America, Inc.; (c) BNY, as Indenture Trustee
under the EFCH 2037 Notes due 2037 and the PCRBs; (d) LDTC, as
Indenture Trustee under the TCEH Unsecured Notes; (e) Holt Texas
LTD, d/b/a Holt Cat; (f) ADA Carbon Solutions (Red River); and (g)
Wilmington Savings, as Indenture Trustee under the TCEH Second Lien
Notes.  The TCEH Committee retained Morrison & Foerster LLP as
counsel; Polsinelli PC as co-counsel and conflicts counsel; Lazard
Freres & Co. LLC as investment banker; FTI Consulting, Inc. as
financial advisor; and Charles River Associates as an energy
consultant.

On Oct. 27, 2014, the U.S. Trustee appointed the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors representing the interests of the unsecured
creditors for EFH, EFIH, EFIH Finance, and EECI, Inc.  The EFH/EFIH
Committee is composed of (a) American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, LLC; (b) Brown & Zhou, LLC c/o Belleair Aviation, LLC; (c)
Peter Tinkham; (d) Shirley Fenicle, as successor-in-interest to the
Estate of George Fenicle; and (e) David William Fahy.  The EFH/EFIH
Committee retained Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhodes, LLP, as
co-counsel and conflicts counsel; AlixPartners, LLP, as
restructuring advisor; Sullivan & Cromwell LLC as counsel;
Guggenheim Securities as investment banker; and Kurtzman Carson
Consultants LLC as noticing agent for both the TCEH Committee and
the EFH/EFIH Committee.

Given the size and complexity of the Chapter 11 Cases, the U.S.
Trustee proposed, and the Debtors and the TCEH Committee agreed, to
recommend that the Bankruptcy Court appoint a committee to, among
other things, review and report as appropriate on fee applications
and statements submitted by the professionals paid for by the
Debtors' Estates.  The Fee Committee is comprised of four members:
(a) one member appointed by and representative of the Debtors
(Cecily Gooch, Vice President and Special Counsel for
Restructuring, Energy Future Holdings); (b) one member appointed by
and representative of the TCEH Creditors' Committee (Peter Kravitz,
Principal and General Counsel, Province Capital); (c) one member
appointed by and representative of the U.S. Trustee (Richard L.
Schepacarter, Trial Attorney, Office of the United States Trustee);
and (d) one independent member (Richard Gitlin, of Gitlin and
Company, LLC).   The Fee Committee retained Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. as
counsel; and Phillips, Goldman & Spence, P.A. as co-counsel.

                          *     *     *

On Aug. 29, 2016, Judge Sontchi confirmed the Chapter 11 exit Plans
of two of Energy Future Holdings Corp.'s subsidiaries, power
generator Luminant and retail electricity provider TXU Energy Inc.
(the "T-Side Debtors").  The Plan became effective on Oct. 3,
2016.

On Aug. 20, 2017, Sempra Energy (NYSE: SRE) announced an agreement
to acquire Energy Future Holdings, the indirect owner of 80 percent
of Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC, operator of the largest
electric transmission and distribution system in Texas.  Under the
agreement, Sempra Energy will pay approximately $9.45 billion in
cash to acquire Energy Future and its ownership in Oncor, while
taking a major step forward in resolving Energy Future's
long-running bankruptcy case.  The enterprise value of the
transaction is approximately $18.8 billion, including the
assumption of Oncor's debt.


ERIE STREET: Unsecureds to Recoup 100% Plus Interest Under New Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Erie Street Investors, LLC, and affiliates filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois a third
amended combined plan of reorganization and disclosure statement.

Class 3 under this new plan consists of the unsecured creditors and
is estimated to be owed approximately $820,000, including interest.
Allowed Class 3 claimants will receive 100% of their allowed
claims in cash in full plus interest, on the Effective Date, to be
paid of the R2 Financing, and/or funds on deposit at that time,
presumed to be approximately Nov. 12, 2017. Class 3 is not
impaired.

An earlier version of the plan stated that the estimated amount
owed to unsecured creditors is approximately $1.5 million. It also
provided that claimants in this class will receive 100% of their
allowed claims but without interest.

On August 24, 2017, at 11:00 a.m., the Court conducted a combined
hearing on approval of the Disclosure Statement and Confirmation of
the Plan.  That combined hearing on confirmation of the Plan and
approval of the Disclosure Statement was scheduled for Sept. 11-12,
2017; and will be continued to Oct. 13.

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb17-10554-368.pdf

                About Erie Street Investors, LLC

Erie Street Investors, LLC, and several affiliates filed separate
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Lead Case No.
17-10554) on April 3, 2017.  The affiliates are LaSalle Investors,
LLC, WSC Parking Fund I, George Street Investors, LLC, and
Sheffield Avenue Investors, LLC.  The cases are jointly
administered.  Arthur Holmer, managing member of Weiland Ventures,
LLC, signed the petitions.

Erie Street Investors and LaSalle Investors each disclosed between
$10 million and $50 million in both assets and liabilities.  WSC
Parking Fund listed between $1 million and $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.

The cases are assigned to Judge Deborah L. Thorne.  The Debtors are
represented by Scott R Clar, Esq., at Crane, Heyman, Simon, Welch &
Clar.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on September 8 appointed five equity
holders to serve on the official committee of non-insider equity
holders in the Chapter 11 cases of Erie Street Investors, LLC, and
its affiliates. Mr. Howlett will serve as interim committee
chairman.

Frances Gecker was appointed Chapter 11 Trustee for Erie Street
Investors, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates on May 16, 2017.  The
trustee hired Ascend Property Management LLC as the Debtors'
property manager; and Jones Lang LaSalle Americas (Illinois), L.P.,
as real estate broker.



ERIN ENERGY: Bello Performs Tasks of Principal Financial Officer
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dippo Bello, the vice president, financial planning and treasurer
of Erin Energy Corporation, began performing functions similar to
those of a principal financial and principal accounting officer of
the Company on or around June 30, 2017.  The Company previously
reported in its current report on Form 8-K, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 10, 2017, that Mr. Bello
and certain other employees were expected to take on the duties of
the principal financial and principal accounting officer of the
Company.

The Company updated the prior disclosure to confirm that only Mr.
Bello will be responsible for those functions moving forward, until
a replacement chief financial officer can be located.

Mr. Dippo Bello (CPA) has served as the vice president, financial
planning and treasurer of the Company since May 2016.  Previously,
from March 2014 to May 2016, Mr. Bello served as the director of
financial planning & treasury of the Company.  From August 2010 to
February 2014, Mr. Bello served as a senior controller with CAMAC
International Corporation.  Mr. Bello received his Bachelor of
Science in Accountancy from Obafemi Awolowo University in Ile-Ife,
Nigeria and his Masters of Business Administration from the
University of Houston, Bauer College of Business.

                     About Erin Energy

Houston, Texas-based Erin Energy Corporation is an independent oil
and gas exploration and production company focused on energy
resources in Africa.  The Company acquires and develops
high-potential exploration and production assets in Africa, and
explores and develops those assets through strategic partnerships
with national oil companies, indigenous local partners and other
independent oil companies.  The Company has production and
exploration projects offshore Nigeria, as well as exploration
licenses offshore Ghana, Kenya and Gambia, and onshore Kenya.

Erin Energy reported a net loss attributable to the Company of
$142.40 million on $77.81 million of revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net loss attributable to the Company
of $430.93 million on $68.42 million of revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2015.  As of June 30, 2017, Erin Energy had $190.9 million
in total assets, $540.2 million in total liabilities and a total
capital deficiency of $349.2 million.

Pannell Kerr Forster of Texas, P.C., in Houston, Texas, issued a
"going concern" qualification on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the
Company incurred net losses in each of the years ended Dec. 31,
2016, 2015 and 2014, and as of Dec. 31, 2016, the Company's current
liabilities exceeded its current assets by $264.4 million.  These
conditions, along with other matters, raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


EXCO RESOURCES: Two Directors Quit From Board
---------------------------------------------
EXCO Resources, Inc., announced the resignation of each of James B.
Ford and Samuel A. Mitchell from the Company's Board of Directors,
in each case effective as of Sept. 20, 2017.  Mr. Ford originally
joined the Board in December 2007 and Mr. Mitchell originally
joined the Board in June 2013.

At the time of their respective resignations, neither Mr. Ford nor
Mr. Mitchell was a member of any committee of the Board.  The
resignations of Mr. Ford and Mr. Mitchell were not the result of
any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the
Company's operations, policies or practices, the Company said in
the press release.

In addition, EXCO announced that on Sept. 20, 2017, it made the
interest payments due on its outstanding 1.5 Lien Notes and 1.75
Lien Term Loans in the form of issuing an additional $17 million
aggregate principal amount of 1.5 Lien Notes and $26.2 million
aggregate principal amount of 1.75 Lien Term Loans, respectively.

                          About EXCO

EXCO Resources, Inc. -- http://www.excoresources.com/-- is an oil
and natural gas exploration, exploitation, acquisition, development
and production company headquartered in Dallas, Texas with
principal operations in Texas, North Louisiana and the Appalachia
region.  EXCO's headquarters are located at 12377 Merit Drive,
Suite 1700, Dallas, TX 75251.

EXCO Resources reported a net loss of $225.3 million on $271
million of total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
compared to a net loss of $1.19 billion on $355.70 million of total
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of June 30 2017,
EXCO Resources had $696.34 million in total assets, $1.43 billion
in total liabilities and a total shareholders' deficit of $741.12
million.

KPMG LLP, in Dallas, Texas, issued a "going concern" qualification
on the consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec.
31, 2016, citing that probable failure to comply with a financial
covenant in its credit facility as well as significant liquidity
needs, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.

                           *    *    *

In December 2016, Moody's Investors Service downgraded EXCO
Resources' corporate family rating to 'Ca' from 'Caa2'.  "EXCO's
downgrade reflects its eroded liquidity position which is
insufficient to fully fund development expenditures at the level
required to stem ongoing production declines," commented Andrew
Brooks, Moody's vice president.  "Absent an injection of additional
liquidity, the source of which is not readily identifiable, EXCO
could face going concern risk as it confronts an unsustainable
capital structure."

In March 2017, S&P Global Ratings raised its corporate credit
rating on EXCO Resources to 'CCC-' from 'SD' (selective default).
The rating outlook is negative.  "The upgrade reflects our
reassessment of our corporate credit rating on EXCO after the
company exchanged most of its outstanding 12.5% second-lien secured
term loans for $683 million new 1.75-lien secured payment-in-kind
(PIK) term loans," said S&P Global Ratings' credit analyst
Alexander Vargas.


FARMACIAS FREDDY: Unsecureds to Get 23.14% Over 24 Months
---------------------------------------------------------
Farmacias Freddy, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Puerto Rico a small business disclosure statement
for its plan of reorganization, dated Sept. 15, 2017.

Unsecured creditors are classified as Priority Unsecured Creditors
and General Unsecured Creditors in Class 2.  Combined, unsecured
creditors are projected to receive a distribution of $180,000 which
equals approximately a 23.14% distribution of their Allowed Claims.
Distributions to General Unsecured Creditors will be in the amount
of $72,000 and will be made via 24 monthly payments of $3,000
commencing on the first day of the 37th month following the
Effective Date of the Plan.

The Plan will be funded from the cash-flows generated by the
Reorganized Debtor. The Debtor's cash-flows consist of the business
income and revenue generated by the Debtor. The Debtor will
contribute its cash flows to fund the Plan commencing on the
Effective Date of the Plan and continue to contribute through the
date that Holders of Allowed Class 1 and 2 Claims receive the
payments specified for in the Plan.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb16-09980-11-79.pdf

                   About Farmacias Freddy

Farmacias Freddy, Inc., based in Naguabo, Puerto Rico, filed a
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D. P.R. Case No. 16-09980)
on December 23, 2016.  The Hon. Brian K. Tester presides over the
case.  Jesus Enrique Batista Sanchez, Esq., at The Batista Law
Group, PSC, serves as Chapter 11 counsel.  In its petition, the
Debtor listed $646,094 in total assets and $1.05 million in total
liabilities.  The petition was signed by Ivan Garcia, president.


FOSSIL GROUP: S&P Lowers CCR to 'B+', Outlook Negative
------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit rating on
Texas-based Fossil Group Inc. to 'B+' from 'BB'. The outlook is
negative.

S&P said, "At the same time, we lowered our issue-level rating on
the company's $850 million revolving credit facility and $231.25
million term loan to 'B+' from 'BB'. Our recovery rating on these
facilities is unchanged at '3', indicating our expectation for
meaningful (50%-70%, rounded to 50%) recovery in the event of a
payment default."

Fossil Group Inc.'s operating performance will likely remain weak
for the remainder of 2017, pressuring the company's cash flow
generation and significantly eroding cushion to its financial
covenants.

In addition, the company faces the maturities of its $850 million
revolving credit facility and $231.25 million term loan in May of
2019.  

S&P said, "The downgrade reflects our expectations that Fossil's
performance will remain weak through the remainder of 2017 due to
continued weakness in its core legacy watch business despite some
positive momentum in the highly competitive wearables category. We
expect sales and margins will continue to decline through the rest
of the year, weakening the company's cash flow generation and
eroding covenant cushion.

"We forecast the company will end its fiscal 2017 with only
low-single-digit percentage cushion to its total leverage covenant
ratio, leaving no room for any additional performance shortfalls
during the upcoming Christmas/holiday season. In addition, Fossil
faces maturities of its $850 million revolving credit facility and
$231.25 million term loan; the company will need to address its
capital structure in the near term as both debt instruments mature
in May of 2019.

"The outlook is negative, reflecting our expectations that the
company's performance will remain weak during the second half of
2017 as growth in wearable devices does not offset declines in the
traditional watch category and the jewelry and leather segments.

"We could lower the ratings if the company's performance during the
important Christmas season remains weak and it shows signs of
difficulty complying with its covenants. We could also lower the
ratings if the company fails to address its maturity profile and
its revolving credit facility and term loan become current in May
of 2018. A lower rating could also result if we believe the company
will be unable to reduce its debt leverage to below 4x in 2018.   

"We could revise the outlook to stable if the company can stabilize
declining sales and improve EBITDA. This could result if declines
in the legacy watch business abates, or if solid growth in its
wearable devices segment offsets weakness in its other segments. In
addition, we would expect the company to address its capital
structure by extending maturity profile of its debt and maintaining
adequate cushion to its covenants."


FRIENDSHIP VILLAGE: Unsecureds to Get Deferred Cash Payments
------------------------------------------------------------
Friendship Village of Mill Creek, NFP, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois a second
amended disclosure statement dated Sept. 18, 2017, in support of
the Debtor's amended joint plan of reorganization.

Class 3 consists of claims that are specified as having priority
under U.S. Bankruptcy Code section 507(a), if any claims still
exist as of the Effective Date.  Each allowed claim under
Bankruptcy Code Section 507(a), which has not been satisfied as of
the Effective Date, in full and final satisfaction and discharge of
and in exchange for each Allowed Unsecured Priority Claim, will
receive from the Reorganized Debtor: (a) deferred cash payments of
a value, as of the Effective Date, equal to the allowed priority
claim or (b) payment in cash in full on the later of: (i) the third
business day after the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably
practicable thereafter as determined by the disbursing agent; and
(ii) the date on which the claim is allowed.  The Debtor estimates
that the Allowed Class 3 Claims will be approximately $11,000 on
the Effective Date.  Class 3 is unimpaired by the Plan.

All cash consideration necessary for the Reorganized Debtor to make
payments or distributions will be obtained from (a) cash on hand of
the Debtor or Reorganized Debtor as appropriate, including cash
derived from business operations; (b) proceeds of the Series 2017A
and Series 2017B Bonds; (c) proceeds from the FSO Equity
Contribution; (d) proceeds from the Unencumbered Property; and (e)
proceeds of Escrowed Entrance Fees.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb17-12470-161.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Sept. 14, 2017, the
Debtor asked the Court to approve the disclosure statement and to
schedule a hearing.  After July 19, 2017, the Debtor started to
work on the terms of a plan of reorganization jointly sponsored by
the Debtor and the Debtor's corporate Member, Friendship Senior
Options, NFP, with the objective of implementing FSO's bid as
quickly as possible in order to preserve, to the extent possible,
the value of the campus.  The Debtor and FSO intend to file that
Plan, together with a joint disclosure statement.

The Hon. LaShonda A. Hunt of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois scheduled for Sept. 20, 2017, at 2:00
p.m., a hearing to consider the adequacy of the Debtor's disclosure
statement.

The Debtor proposed this timeline:

     Sept. 20, 2017                 Voting Record Date

     Sept. 27, 2017                 Solicitation Mailing Deadline

     Oct. 23, 2017
     at 4:00 p.m. Central Time      Voting Deadline and Deadline
                                    to File Objections to Plan
                                    Confirmation.

     Oct. 19, 2107 at 2:00 p.m.     Hearing on Confirmation of the

                                    Debtor's Plan.

            About Friendship Village of Mill Creek

Friendship Village of Mill Creek, NFP, doing business as
GreenFields of Geneva, owns and operates a continuing care
retirement community located in Geneva, Illinois, known as
GreenFields of Geneva ("Campus").  The Campus is improved with a
building which includes (i) 147 independent living units, (ii) 51
assisted living units, (iii) 26 memory support-assisted living
units, (iv) 43 nursing beds, and (v) related common areas and
parking.  Approximately 270 senior citizens reside at the Campus.

Friendship Village of Mill Creek sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 17-12470) on April 20, 2017.

                          *     *     *

GreenFields of Geneva has filed a motion to sell substantially all
assets to Friendship Senior Options ("FSO") for $52,800,000,
subject to overbid.  In connection with the sale process, the
Debtor proposed a July 19, 2017 deadline for bids and an auction on
July 26.

Stahl Cowen Crowley Addis, LLC, is serving as counsel to the
Debtor, with the engagement led by Bruce Dopke, Esq., Kevin V.
Hunt, Esq., and Melissa J. Lettiere, Esq., in Chicago, Illinois.


GELTECH SOLUTIONS: Chairman Swaps Notes for 5.7 Million Shares
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Michael Reger, the chairman and president of GelTech Solutions,
Inc. converted his $1,997,482 convertible note into 5,707,095
shares of the Company's common stock.  All of the securities were
issued without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in
reliance upon the exemption provided by Section 3(a)(9)
thereunder.

                        About GelTech

Jupiter, Fla.-based GelTech Solutions. Inc. is a Delaware
corporation organized in 2006.  The Company markets four products:
(1) FireIce(R), a water soluble fire retardant used to protect
firefighters, structures and wildlands; (2) Soil2O(R) 'Dust
Control', its new application which is used for dust mitigation in
the aggregate, road construction, mining, as well as, other
industries that deal with daily dust control issues; (3) Soil2O(R),
a product which reduces the use of water and is primarily marketed
to golf courses, commercial landscapers and the agriculture market;
and (4) FireIce(R) Home Defense Unit, a system for applying
FireIce(R) to structures to protect them from wildfires.

GelTech Solutions reported a net loss of $4.67 million on $1.20
million of sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared with a
net loss of $6.02 million on $1.31 million of sales for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of June 30, 2017, Geltech had $2.31
million in total assets, $8.74 million in total liabilities and a
total stockholders' deficit of $6.42 million.

Salberg & Company, P.A., in Boca Raton, Florida, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the Company has a net
loss and net cash used in operating activities in the amount of
$4,672,043 and $3,344,593, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2016 and has an accumulated deficit and stockholders'
deficit of $47,957,926 and $6,363,616, respectively, at Dec. 31,
2016.  These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.


GELTECH SOLUTIONS: President Has 58% Equity Stake as of Sept. 18
----------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Lloyd Reger, president of Geltech Solutions, Inc., reported
in a Schedule 13D/A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission that as of Sept. 18, 2017, he beneficially owns
55,653,881 shares of the Company's common stock including
18,514,069 shares underlying secured convertible notes due Dec. 31,
2020, and 7,670,651 shares underlying warrants.  This amounts to
approximately 58.0% of the 69,826,362 outstanding shares as of
Sept. 19, 2017.

In 2015, Mr. Reger and the Company entered into a Secured Revolving
Convertible Promissory Note Agreement for a credit facility of up
to $4 million, which has since been increased to $6 million.  Under
the Agreement, the Company may, with the prior approval of the
reporting person, receive advances under the secured convertible
credit facility.  Each advance bears an annual interest rate of
7.5%, is due Dec. 31, 2020, and is convertible at the rate equal to
the closing price of the Company's common stock on the day prior to
the date the parties agree to the advance. Additionally, in
connection with each advance, the Company issues the reporting
person two-year warrants at an exercise price of $2.00 per share in
an amount equal to 50% of the number of shares issuable upon the
conversion of the related advance.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                    https://is.gd/DMNTc2

                        About GelTech

Jupiter, Fla.-based GelTech Solutions. Inc. is a Delaware
corporation organized in 2006.  The Company markets four products:
(1) FireIce(R), a water soluble fire retardant used to protect
firefighters, structures and wildlands; (2) Soil2O(R) 'Dust
Control', its new application which is used for dust mitigation in
the aggregate, road construction, mining, as well as, other
industries that deal with daily dust control issues; (3) Soil2O(R),
a product which reduces the use of water and is primarily marketed
to golf courses, commercial landscapers and the agriculture market;
and (4) FireIce(R) Home Defense Unit, a system for applying
FireIce(R) to structures to protect them from wildfires.

GelTech Solutions reported a net loss of $4.67 million on $1.20
million of sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared with a
net loss of $6.02 million on $1.31 million of sales for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of June 30, 2017, Geltech had $2.31
million in total assets, $8.74 million in total liabilities and a
total stockholders' deficit of $6.42 million.

Salberg & Company, P.A., in Boca Raton, Florida, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the Company has a net
loss and net cash used in operating activities in the amount of
$4,672,043 and $3,344,593, respectively, for the year ended Dec.
31, 2016 and has an accumulated deficit and stockholders' deficit
of $47,957,926 and $6,363,616, respectively, at Dec. 31, 2016.
These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern.


GENERAL WIRELESS: Oct. 25 Plan Confirmation Hearing
---------------------------------------------------
The Honorable Brendan L. Shannon of the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware will convene a hearing on
October 25, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time), or as soon
thereafter as counsel may be heard, to consider (i) final approval
of the Disclosure Statement and (ii) confirmation of the Plan of
Reorganization filed by General Wireless Operations Inc., dba
Radioshack, and its affiliated debtors.

The latest version of the Plan provides that Class 5A GWI General
Unsecured Claims -- estimated at $110 million -- are impaired by
the Plan.  Recovery percentage for this class is contingent on
litigation recoveries.  

All consideration necessary for the Reorganized Debtor or the
Litigation Trustee to make payments or distributions pursuant to
the Plan will be obtained from (i) Cash held by the Debtors as of
the Effective Date, on which the Second Lien Lenders have agreed to
release their Claims and Liens to the extent necessary to pay
Allowed Administrative Claims and Allowed Priority Claims, (ii) the
DIP Facility and the Exit Facility, (iii) the Litigation Trust
Reserve and Litigation Trust Funding Amount, and (iv) other Cash of
the Reorganized Debtors, including Cash from continuing business
operations.

Exit Facility is a new credit facility in an amount not to exceed
$2 million to be entered into on or after the Effective Date,
having the terms and conditions set forth in the Exit Facility
Credit Agreement.

The Litigation Proceeds will be used to satisfy any unpaid Allowed
Administrative Claims and Allowed Priority Claims payable pursuant
to the Plan and reimburse Supporting Lenders for any amounts
advanced by them under the DIP Facility or the Exit Facility.
After satisfaction of these amounts, Litigation Proceeds up to
$5,000,000 will be allocated (a) 80% for the benefit of the Holders
of Allowed First Out Second Lien Claims, and (b) 20% to the
Litigation Trust for the benefit of Holders of Allowed General
Unsecured Claims.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Plan is available at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb17-10506-940.pdf

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement
Statement is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb17-10506-942.pdf

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb17-10506-911.pdf  

                       About General Wireless

Based in Fort Worth, Texas, General Wireless Operations Inc., doing
business as RadioShack -- http://www.RadioShack.com/-- operates a
chain of electronics stores. Its predecessor, RadioShack Corp.,
then with 4,000 locations, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.
Del. Case No. 15-10197) in February 2015 and announced plans to
close underperforming stores.

In March 2015, General Wireless, a Standard General affiliate, won
court approval to purchase RadioShack Corp.'s assets, gaining
ownership of around 1,700 RadioShack locations. Two years later,
General Wireless commenced its own bankruptcy case, announcing
plans to close 200 of 1,300 remaining stores.

General Wireless Operations Inc., and its affiliates based in Fort
Worth, Texas, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case
No. 17-10506) on March 8, 2017.  In its petition, General Wireless
estimated $100 million to $500 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Bradford Tobin, SVP and general counsel, signed the
petitions.

The Debtors tapped Pepper Hamilton LLP as legal counsel; Loughlin
Management Partners & Company, Inc., as financial advisor; and
Prime Clerk, LLC, as claims and noticing agent.

On March 17, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee selected
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP as its lead counsel; Klehr Harrison Harvey
Branzburg LLP as local counsel; Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar &
Scott LLP, as special counsel; and Berkeley Research Group LLC as
financial advisor.


GNC HOLDINGS: S&P Lowers CCR to B+ on Heightened Competitive Risk
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit rating on the
Pittsburgh, Pa.-based vitamin and supplement retailer GNC Holdings
Inc. to 'B+' from 'BB-'. The ratings outlook is negative.

S&P expects GNC's operations will remain pressured because of
increased competition, especially from mass merchants and online
retailers capitalizing on changing consumer preferences.  

S&P said, "At the same time, we lowered the issue-level rating on
the company's senior secured term loan facility to 'BB-' from 'BB'.
The '2' recovery rating is unchanged and indicates our expectation
for substantial recovery (70%- 90%, rounded estimate of 75%) of
principal in the event of a payment default or bankruptcy.

"The downgrade reflects our expectation that GNC's operations will
remain under pressure because of increased competitive threats and
the secular change in retail. We expect GNC's industry competitors
such as mass merchants, internet-based vendors, and other similar
adjacent supplement and vitamin retailers (including but not
limited to supermarkets and natural food stores) will increasingly
capitalize on changing consumer preferences, including online
shopping and price sensitivity. Moreover, we believe GNC's business
and operating initiatives such as updated and streamlined product
pricing, sales associate training, and new product introductions
may have limited benefits to offset these negative factors over the
next 12 to 18 months. In addition, we currently assume the company
will address its upcoming revolver maturity in September 2018 and
term loan maturity in March 2019, but note that refinancing risk
increases as these maturities continue to approach.

"The negative rating outlook reflects our expectations for
heightened competitive pressures and the risk of an extended
decline in operating performance. We expect adjusted leverage of
about 4.5x and FFO to debt around the 15% range over the coming
year. In our base-case scenario we assume the company will
refinance upcoming maturities in the relative near term, but we
note that refinancing risk increases as these maturities approach.

"We could lower the rating if the company's performance
deteriorates further and the magnitude of comparable sales declines
increase to a mid-single-digit rate while margins contract 150 bps
or more versus our forecast. This would lead to adjusted leverage
approaching the 5x range and FFO to debt around 12% assuming no
meaningful debt repayment. We could also lower the rating if it
appears the company does not adequately address its upcoming debt
maturities in a timely fashion.

"We could revise the outlook to stable if comparable-store sales
and customer traffic trends improved to a low- to mid-single-digit
rate while the operating metrics improved by 100 bps versus our
projection under the new business model. Under such a scenario, we
would expect total sales to improve modestly and EBITDA margins of
19% or more, resulting in leverage approaching the low-4x range and
FFO to debt in the high teens. We must also believe improved credit
metrics remain sustainable to support the ratings."


GOLDEN DAY SCHOOLS: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Golden Day Schools, Inc.
        4508 Crenshaw Blvd.
        Los Angeles, CA 90043

Type of Business: Golden Day Schools, Inc. is a privately-held
                  company that operates a private elementary
                  school in Los Angeles California.  The
                  debtor is a non-profit federal 501(c)(3) and
                  California State Tax Exempt Corporation.

Case No.: 17-21651

Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 22, 2017

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Judge: Hon. Neil W. Bason

Debtor's Counsel: Leslie A Cohen, Esq.
                  LESLIE COHEN LAW PC
                  506 Santa Monica Bl Ste 200
                  Santa Monica, CA 90401
                  Tel: 310-394-5900
                  Fax: 310-394-9280
                  E-mail: leslie@lesliecohenlaw.com

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Clark E. Parker, president.

A full-text copy of the petition, along with a list of three
unsecured creditors, is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-21651.pdf


GRAND VIEW FINANCIAL: Hires Keller Williams as Real Estate Broker
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Grand View Financial, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California to employ Keller
Williams Realty and KW Commercial, as real estate broker to the
Debtor.

Grand View Financial requires Keller Williams to market and sell
the Debtor's real properties located in California, Idaho,
Michigan, and Washington.

Keller Williams will be paid a commission of 6% of the gross sale
price of the properties.

W. Darrow Fiedler, managing director of Keller Williams Realty and
KW Commercial, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estates.

Keller Williams can be reached at:

     W. Darrow Fiedler
     KELLER WILLIAMS REALTY AND KW COMMERCIAL
     23670 Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 100
     Torrance, CA 90505-5968
     Tel: (310) 600-0757
     E-mail: darrow@kw.com

                About Grand View Financial, LLC

Grand View Financial LLC is a Wyoming limited liability company,
which is in the business of acquiring distressed real property.
Grand View Financial was formed in 2015.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No. 17-20125) on August 17, 2017.
Steve Rogers, its managing member, signed the petition.  Levene,
Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP serves as the Debtor's legal
counsel.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $29.88 million in
assets and $39.71 million in liabilities.

Judge Julia W. Brand presides over the case.


GREAT BASIN: CFO Now Works 20 Hours Per Week
--------------------------------------------
Great Basin Scientific, Inc. and Jeffrey Rona agreed to amend his
employment agreement such that Mr. Rona will devote approximately
20 hours a week to the Company at a revised salary of $104,000.
Mr. Rona serves as the Company's chief financial officer.

                       About Great Basin

West Valley City, Utah-based Great Basin Scientific Inc. --
http://www.gbscience.com/-- is a molecular diagnostic testing
company focused on the development and commercialization of its
patented, molecular diagnostic platform designed to test for
infectious disease, especially hospital-acquired infections.  The
Company believes that small to medium sized hospital laboratories,
those under 400 beds, are in need of simpler and more affordable
molecular diagnostic testing methods.  The Company markets a system
that combines both affordability and ease-of-use, when compared to
other commercially available molecular testing methods.

Great Basin Scientific reported a net loss of $89.14 million on
$3.04 million of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
compared to a net loss of $57.89 million on $2.14 million of
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of March 31, 2017,
Great Basin had $29.24 million in total assets, $59.10 million in
total liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $29.86
million.

The Company's independent accountants, BDO USA, LLP, in Salt Lake
City, Utah, expressed "substantial doubt" about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern noting that the Company has
incurred substantial losses from operations, has negative operating
cash flows and has a net capital deficiency.


GREEN TERRACE CONDOMINIUM: Hires Genovese Joblove as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Green Terrace Condominium Association, Inc., seeks authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to
employ Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A., as general bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtor.

Green Terrace Condominium requires Genovese Joblove to:

   a. advise the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties
      of a debtor-in- possession in the continued management
      and operation of its business and properties;

   b. advise the Debtor with respect to its responsibilities
      in complying with the U.S. Trustee's Guidelines and
      Reporting Requirements and with the rule of the
      Bankruptcy Court;

   c. attend meetings and negotiate with representatives of
      creditors and other parties-in-interest and advise and
      consult on the conduct of the  case, including all of
      the legal and administrative requirements of operating
      in Chapter  11;

   d. advise the Debtor in connection with any contemplated sales
      of assets or business combinations, formulate and implement
      bidding procedures, evaluate competing offers, draft
      appropriate corporate documents with respect to the
      proposed sales, and counsel the Debtor in connection with
      the closing of such sales;

   e. advise the Debtor in connection with post-petition
      financing and  cash  collateral arrangements, provide
      advice and counsel with respect to  pre-petition financing
      arrangements, and provide advice to the Debtor in
      connection with its financing and capital structure, and
      negotiate and draft documents relating thereto;

   f. advise the Debtor on matters relating to the evaluation of
      the assumption, rejection or assignment of unexpired
      leases and executory  contracts;

   g. provide advice to the Debtor with respect to legal issues
      arising in or relating to the Debtor's ordinary course of
      business including attendance at meetings with the Debtor's
      financial and  turnaround  advisors and meetings of the
      board of directors, and advice on  employee,  workers'
      compensation, employee benefits, labor, tax, insurance,
      securities,  corporate, business operation, contracts,
      joint ventures, real  property, press or public affairs
      and regulatory matters;

   h. take all necessary action to protect and preserve the
      Debtor's estates, including the prosecution of actions on
      its behalf, the defense of any actions commenced
      against the estate, negotiations concerning all litigation
      in which the Debtor may be involved and objections to
      claims filed against the estate;

   i. prepare on behalf of the Debtor all motions, applications,
      answers, orders, reports and papers necessary to the
      administration of the estate;

   j. negotiate and prepare on the Debtor's behalf one or more
      plans of reorganization, disclosure statements and all
      related agreements and documents, and take any necessary
      action on behalf of the Debtor to obtain confirmation of
      such plans;

   k. attend meetings with third parties and participate in
      negotiations with respect to the above  matters;

   l. appear before the Bankruptcy Court, any appellate courts,
      and the U.S. Trustee,  and protect the interests of the
      Debtor's estate before such courts and the U.S. Trustee;
      and

   m. perform all other necessary legal services and provide all
      other necessary legal advice to the Debtor in connection
      with the Chapter 11 case.

Genovese Joblove will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                   $525
     Associates                  $225-$375
     Legal Assistants            $75-$195

Genovese Joblove will be paid a retainer in the amount of $50,000.

Genovese Joblove will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Glenn D. Moses, shareholder of Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A.,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Genovese Joblove can be reached at:

     Glenn D. Moses, Esq.
     GENOVESE JOBLOVE & BATTISTA, P.A.
     100 Southeast Second Street, 44th Floor
     Miami, FL 33131
     Tel: (305) 349-2300
     Fax: (305) 349-2310
     E-mail: gmoses@gjb-law.com

                   About Green Terrace Condominium
                          Association, Inc.

Green Terrace Condominium Association, Inc., based in West Palm
Beach, Fla., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
17-19188) on July 21, 2017. In its petition, the Debtor estimated
less than $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities. The petition was signed by Kolman Kenigsberg as
receiver for the Debtor.

Judge Paul G. Hyman, Jr. presides over the case. Eric A Rosen,
Esq., at Fowler White Burnett, P.A., serves as bankruptcy counsel.

The Debtor's list of 16 unsecured creditors is available for free
at http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb17-19188.pdf


GREENLIGHT ORGANIC: Hires Crowell & Moring as Special Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greenlight Organic, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Nevada to employ Crowell & Moring LLP, as
special counsel to the Debtor.

Greenlight Organic requires Crowell & Moring to represent the
Debtor in the case entitled United States v. Greenlight Organic,
Inc., pending before the U.S. Court of International Trade, Case
No. 17-cv-0031.

Crowell & Moring will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners                    $520-$636
     Associates                  $450
     Analysts                    $265

Crowell & Moring will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Frances P. Hadfield, a member of Crowell & Moring LLP, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Crowell & Moring can be reached at:

     Frances P. Hadfield, Esq.
     CROWELL & MORING LLP
     590 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor
     New York, NY 10022-2544
     Tel: (212) 803-4040
     E-mail: fhadfield@crowell.com

                   About Greenlight Organic, Inc.

Greenlight Organic Inc. filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 17-14000) on July 25, 2017. The Debtor's
assets and liabilities are both below $1 million.  Gregory E.
Garman, Esq., at Garman Turner Gordon, LLP serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel. The Debtor hired Crowell & Moring LLP, as
special counsel.


GROUP ONE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
--------------------------------------------
Debtor: Group One Construction, Inc.
        1050 Dell Avenue
        Campbell, CA 95008

Type of Business: Group One Construction Inc. is a full-service
                  general contracting, construction management,
                  and design/build service provider in the Silicon

                  Valley area.  The company constructs offices,
                  retail centers, business parks, restaurants,
                  automotive and healthcare centers.  The
                  company's comprehensive preconstruction services

                  include: project management, quality control
                  site evaluation, public works department
                  approval process, planning department approval
                  process,  building department approval process
                  and scheduling.

                  http://www.grouponeconstructioninc.com/

Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 21, 2017

Case No.: 17-52301

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of California (San Jose)

Judge: Hon. Stephen L. Johnson

Debtor's Counsel: Brian M. Kandel, Esq.
                  SADRI & KANDEL LLP
                  4633 Old Ironsides Dr. #115
                  Santa Clara, CA 95054
                  Tel: (831) 427-5136
                  E-mail: brian@sadriandkandel.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Richard Lee Foust, president.

The Debtor did not file a list of its 20 largest unsecured
creditors together with the petition.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb17-52301.pdf


GUIDED SYSTEMS: Hires Warren Averett as Accountant
--------------------------------------------------
Guided Systems Technologies, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia to employ
Warren Averett CPAs & Advisors, as accountant to the Debtor.

Guided Systems requires Warren Averett to:

   a. prepare and file required federal and state tax returns;

   b. assist with preparation of financial statements required
      by the Bankruptcy Code; and

   c. perform all other necessary accounting services and give
      all other necessary accounting advice to Debtor in
      connection with the Chapter 11 case.

Warren Averett will be paid at the hourly rate of $400.  Prior to
the commencement of the Chapter 11 case, Warren Averett was owed
$1,932.84 in fees from the Debtor for prior accounting services.
The firm explicitly waives any claim it might have for the
prepetition fees owed.

Warren Averett will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Mike Moriarty, member of Warren Averett CPAs & Advisors, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Warren Averett can be reached at:

     Mike Moriarty
     WARREN AVERETT CPAS & ADVISORS
     6 Concourse Parkway, Suite 600
     Atlanta, GA 30328
     Tel: (770) 393-6190
     Fax: (770) 393-0319
     E-mail: Mike.moriarty@warrenaverett.com

               About Guided Systems Technologies, Inc.

Guided Systems -- http://guidedsys.com/-- is a provider of
engineering and construction services focused primarily on the
application of its patented neural network adaptive control methods
in the aerospace sector. Its technology is used to dramatically
reduce the time and money required to complete guidance and control
system design, development and validation, and also offers the
potential to significantly increase a system's tolerance of faults
or failures when redundant means for actuation are available. While
applicable to manned flight systems, missiles, munitions and
spacecraft, the technology is particularly well suited to the
development programs typical of unmanned flight vehicles, and is
especially effective in application to rotorcraft and other types
of complex vertical take-off and landing vehicle designs. The
technology also offers great benefits for control of flexible
structures, including the flexible airframes that are
characteristic of next generation High Altitude Long Endurance
(HALE) aircraft designs.

Guided Systems Technologies, Inc., based in McDonough, Georgia,
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 17-59688) on
June 2, 2017.  David A. Geiger, Esq., at Geiger Law, LLC, serves as
its bankruptcy counsel.

The Company is a small business Debtor as defined in 11 U.S.C.
Section 101(51D).  In its petition, the Debtor estimated $0 to
$50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities. The
petition was signed by Dr. J. Eric Corban, founder and CTO.


HARD ROCK EXPLORATION: Taps Fowler Bell as Bankruptcy Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hard Rock Exploration, Inc., and its affiliates seek authority from
the United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of West
Virginia, Charleston Division, to employ Fowler Bell PLLC as their
general bankruptcy counsel.

Services to be rendered by Fowler Bell are:

     a. provide the Debtors with legal advice with respect to their
powers, rights, duties and obligations in the continued operation
of the business and management of their property;

      b. prepare all necessary schedules and statements, prepare
motions, applications, pleadings, answers, orders, reports and
other papers;

     c. take legal action as is necessary to protect and conserve
property of the estates;

     d. assist the Debtors with the preparation, negotiation,
amendment, confirmation and consummation of its Plan of
Reorganization and accompanying Disclosure Statement;

     e. assist the Debtors in dealing with creditors and other
parties-in-interest;

     f. advise and represent the Debtors in hearings and other
judicial proceedings in connection with all applications, motions,
complaints and other similar matters;

     g. advise the Debtors with respect to the claims and causes of
action which it may have against various parties and institute
appropriate adversary proceedings;

     h. represent the Debtors in any pending non-bankruptcy
litigation and any litigation that arises post-petition;

     i. advise the Debtors in connection with the potential sale of
assets;

     j. consulting with the Debtors regarding tax matters; and

     k. perform any and all others legal services incident and
necessary to the case.

Fowler Bell will charge hourly based on its usual and customary
rates for similar services, ranging from $325 to $450 per hour for
attorneys and $13 an hour for paralegals. Attorneys most likely to
handle this case and their hourly rates are:

     Taft A. McKinstry, Member: $450
     Matthew D. Ellison, Member: $375
     Christopher G. Colson, Member: $375
     Robert Welleford, Of Counsel: $375

Taft A. McKinstry attests that his firm is a disinterested person
under the definition set forth in the Bankruptcy Code and does not
hold or represent any interest adverse the interest of the estate.

The Counsels can be reached through:

     Taft A. McKinstry, Esq.
     Matthew D. Ellison, Esq.
     Christopher G. Colson, Esq.
     Robert Welleford, Esq.
     FOWLER BELL PLLC
     300 West Vine Street, Suite 600
     Lexington, KY 40507-1751
     Tel: 859-252-6700
     Fax: 859-255-3735
     E-mail: TMcKinstry@Fowlerlaw.com

                  About Hard Rock Exploration

Founded in 2003, Hard Rock Exploration, Inc., and its affiliates
provide oil and gas exploration and production services in Virginia
and West Virginia.  Hard Rock focuses on drilling horizontal
wells.

Hard Rock Exploration, Inc., and its affiliates filed a chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Lead Case No. 17-20459) on September 5,
2017.  The affiliates are Caraline Energy Company (Bankr. S.D.
W.Va. 17-20461); Brothers Realty, LLC  (Bankr. S.D. W.Va.
17-20462); Blue Jacket Gathering, LLC (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. 17-20463)
and Blue Jacket Partnership (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. 17-20464).

The petitions were signed by James L. Stephens, the Debtors'
president.

The Hon. Frank W. Volk presides over the case. The Debtors are
represented by Christopher S. Smith, Esq. of Hoyer, Hoyer & Smith,
PLLC and  Taft A. McKinstry, Esq. at  Fowler Bell PLLC.

At the time of filing, Hard Rock estimates $10 million to $50
million in assets and liabilities. Caraline Energy estimates $10
million to $50 million in assets and liabilities.


HARRINGTON & KING: May Use Cash Collateral Through Sept. 29
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Deborah L. Thorne of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois has granted Harrington & King
Perforating Co. and Harrington & King South Inc. permission to
continue use of cash collateral through Sept. 29, 2017.

The Motion is continued to Sept. 28, 2017, at 10:00 a.m.

A copy of the Order is available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb16-15650-265.pdf

The Court previously granted the Debtors permission to continue use
of cash collateral through Sept. 15, 2017.  Inland Bank & Trust
agreed to extend the terms of the Agreed Interim Cash Collateral
Order.

                   About The Harrington & King

The Harrington & King Perforating Co., Inc., and Harrington & King
South Inc. are in the business of manufacturing perforating metal
sheets and rolled coils of varying gauges and types to produce hole
patterns of various sizes, shapes, and spacing.  Most of the work
is done to customer specifications and consists of high value-added
jobs, not typical of most metal punching.  The products are used in
automotive, acoustics, architecture, food and pharmaceutical
straining and filtering, interior design, manufacturing, safety
flooring, pollution control, transportation and mining cleaning and
grading, electronics and other fields.

Harrington & King Perforating Co. and Harrington & King South
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
N.D. Ill. Case Nos. 16-15650 and 16-15651) on May 7, 2016.  The
petitions were signed by Greg McCallister, chief restructuring
officer and chief operating officer.  The cases are jointly
administered under Case No. 16-15650.  

The Debtors each estimated assets and liabilities in the range of
$1 million to $10 million.

The cases are assigned to Judge Deborah L. Thorne.

The Debtors engaged The Law Office of William J. Factor, Ltd., as
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtors tapped Ulmer & Berne LLP as
special counsel; Spiegel & Cahill, P.C., as special workers'
compensation counsel; Beacon Management Advisors LLC as financial
advisor; and Cushman & Wakefield of Illinois, Inc., as real estate
broker.

The official committee of unsecured creditors retained Goldstein &
McClintock LLLP as its legal counsel and Conway MacKenzie, Inc., as
its financial advisor.

                         *     *     *

On April 11, 2017, the Debtors filed a disclosure statement and
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.


HELIOS AND MATHESON: Enters Into Exchange Pact With Palladium
-------------------------------------------------------------
On Dec. 1, 2016, pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement
entered into by Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc., and Palladium
Capital Advisors LLC, an institutional investor, the Company agreed
to sell and issue two Senior Secured Convertible Notes
(collectively, the "December Notes"), an initial note in the
principal amount of $1,820,000 and an additional note in the
principal amount of $4,900,000 (the "December Additional Note") to
the Investor for consideration consisting of (i) a cash payment by
the Investor in the amount of $1,100,000 and (ii) a secured
promissory note payable by the Investor to the Company in the
principal amount of $4,900,000.  With the exception of $900,000 in
principal amount remaining unpaid under the December Additional
Note, the December Notes have been paid in full.

On Aug. 15, 2017, pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement
entered into by the Company and the Investor, the Company agreed to
sell and issue Senior Secured Convertible Notes to the Investor in
the aggregate principal amount of $10,300,000 for consideration
consisting of (i) a cash payment of $220,000, and (ii) a secured
promissory note payable by the Investor to the Company in the
principal amount of $8,800,000.

               Amendment and Exchange Agreement

On Sept. 19, 2017, the Company and the Investor entered into an
Amendment and Exchange Agreement pursuant to which the Company and
the Investor agreed that:

   * the Company would effect a Mandatory Conversion (as defined
     in the December Additional Note) of $890,000 in principal
     amount of the December Additional Note, which conversion was  
  
     effective as of Sept. 18, 2017;

   * the Investor would prepay the remaining balance of the
     December Investor Note, in the amount of $670,000; and

   * the Investor would prepay $1,830,000 of the August Investor
     Note.

In conjunction with the Mandatory Conversion of the December
Additional Note, the Company agreed to issue to the Investor, on
Sept. 20, 2017, 445,367 shares of the Company's common stock.

Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, the Investor has agreed to
waive

   * any and all rights to receive any additional shares of the
     Company's common stock as a True-Up, as defined in the
     December Notes;

   * any restriction (excluding any participation rights) on the
     Company's offer, sale or issuance of shares of common stock
     and/or securities convertible into common stock in one or
     more private securities offerings, so long as the securities
     offered have a purchase price of at least $3.00 per share of
     common stock (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends,
     stock combinations, recapitalizations and similar events);
     and

   * any restriction on the filing, by the Company, of one or more
     registration statements with the SEC for the resale of any
     shares of common stock issued or issuable in connection with
     any Permitted PIPE or Convertible Securities (as defined in
     the August Securities Purchase Agreement) issued in any
     Permitted PIPE solely to the extent that all shares of common

     stock issued upon resale of all Convertible Securities held
     by the holder are either (x) concurrently registered for
     resale on such registration statement, (y) registered for
     resale pursuant to one or more prior and effective
     registration statement(s) that at such time is (or are)
     available for use by the holder or (z) eligible to be resold  

     by the holder pursuant to Rule 144.

The Investor has agreed to exchange $10,000 in aggregate principal
amount of the December Additional Note for a new senior convertible
note issued by the Company in an initial aggregate principal amount
of $697,000.

The Exchange Agreement also includes standard representations and
warranties made by the Company for the benefit of the Investor.

As a result of the transaction described above, the Company
received gross proceeds of $2.5 million on Sept. 20, 2017.

                      The Exchange Note

The Exchange Note, in the aggregate principal amount of $697,000,
does not accrue interest except if an Event of Default, as defined
in the Exchange Note, occurs and remains uncured, during which time
interest will accrue at the rate of 12% per annum during the first
30 days following the Event of Default and at the rate of 18% per
annum thereafter.  The Exchange Note matures on April 16, 2018.  On
the Maturity Date, the Company will be required to pay to the
holder an amount in cash representing 115% of all outstanding
principal, accrued and unpaid interest and accrued and unpaid late
charges, if any.  The Company may not prepay the Exchange Note
prior to the Maturity Date.  At any time after the issuance date,
the Investor may convert principal, interest and late charges, if
any, into shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion
price of $3.00 per share.

If the Equity Conditions, as defined in the Exchange Note, are
satisfied, the Company may require the holder of the Exchange Note
to convert all or any part of the Exchange Note, up to the Maximum
Mandatory Share Amount and the Maximum Mandatory Conversion Amount.
If on the fifth trading day immediately following a Mandatory
Conversion Date and on each fifth trading day thereafter through
and including the fifteenth trading day immediately following such
Mandatory Conversion Date (each, a "True-Up Date") the True-Up
Price is less than the applicable Mandatory Conversion Price, the
Company must deliver to the holder of the Exchange Note an
additional number of shares of common stock equal to the difference
between the number of shares of common stock delivered to the
holder as a result of the Mandatory Conversion and the number of
shares determined by dividing the principal, interest and late
charges converted by the True-Up Price.  The "True-Up Price" is
defined as 85% of the lowest volume weighted average price of the
Company's common stock on the trading day with the lowest volume
weighted average price during the 15 consecutive trading days
following the Mandatory Conversion.

"Mandatory Conversion Date" means the third trading day following
the delivery by the Company of a Mandatory Conversion Notice.

"Mandatory Conversion Price" means, with respect to any Mandatory
Conversion that price which will be the lowest of (i) $3.00 and
(ii) 80% of the sum of (A) the volume weighted average price of the
Company's common stock for each of the 3 trading days with the
lowest volume weighted average price of the Company's common stock
during the 20 consecutive trading day period ending on and
including the trading day immediately prior to the applicable
Mandatory Conversion Date divided by (B) 3.

"Maximum Mandatory Share Amount" with respect to any Mandatory
Conversion Date means 100% of the quotient of (x) the sum of the
composite aggregate daily share trading volume of the common stock
for each trading day during the 5 trading day period ending and
including the trading day immediately prior to the applicable
Mandatory Conversion Notice Date, divided by (y) 5.

"Maximum Mandatory Conversion Amount" with respect to any Mandatory
Conversion Date means the difference of (x) $500,000 less (y) the
sum of each Conversion Amount converted under the Exchange Note
during the 5 trading day period ending and including the applicable
Mandatory Conversion Date.

The Exchange Note contains standard and customary Events of Default
including but not limited to: (i) the suspension from trading or
the failure of the Company’s common stock to be trading or listed
(as applicable) on an Eligible Market, as defined in the Exchange
Note, for a period of five consecutive trading days; (ii) the
Company's failure, after a conversion by the holder, to deliver the
shares of common stock within five trading days; (iii) the failure
by the Company to reserve sufficient shares for conversion of all
principal, accrued interest and late charges, if any; (iv) the
failure by the Company to make payments when due; (v) the failure
by the Company to remove any restrictive legend on any certificate
or any shares of common stock issued to the holder upon conversion
of the Exchange Note; (vi) breaches of any representation or
warranty made by the Company; and (vii) bankruptcy or insolvency.

Provided there has been no Equity Conditions Failure, as defined in
the Exchange Note, the Company will have the right to redeem all,
but not less than all, of the amounts remaining unpaid under the
Exchange Note.  The portion of the Exchange Note subject to
redemption can be redeemed by the Company in cash at a price equal
to 120% of the amount being redeemed, provided, however, that the
Company may not elect to redeem any amount during the 30 day period
following approval by The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC of the Company's
Listing of Additional Shares form.

Following an Event of Default, the holder may require the Company
to redeem all or any portion of the Exchange Note.  The redemption
amount may be paid in cash or with shares of the Company's common
stock, at the election of the holder, at a price equal to the Event
of Default Redemption Price.  The Event of Default Redemption Price
equals the greater of (i) all principal, interest and late fees, if
any, owed by the Company pursuant to the Exchange Note multiplied
by 125% and (ii) the greatest closing sale price of the common
stock on any trading day during the period commencing on the date
immediately preceding the Event of Default and ending on the date
the Company makes the entire payment required to be made pursuant
to the Exchange Note multiplied by 125%.

The Company must immediately redeem the Exchange Note in cash upon
the occurrence of a Bankruptcy Event of Default.

The Company may not enter into or be party to a Fundamental
Transaction, as defined in the Exchange Note, unless the successor
entity assumes in writing all of the obligations of the Company
under the Exchange Note.  The holder also has the right to require
the Company to redeem the Exchange Note in cash in the event of a
Change of Control, as defined in the Exchange Note, at the Change
of Control Redemption Price, as defined in the Exchange Note.

Among other rights that the holder is granted in the event that the
Company issues other securities, if the Company issues or sells or
enters into any agreement to issue or sell, any variable price
securities at a price which varies or may vary with the market
price of the shares of common stock, including by way of one or
more resets to a fixed price, but exclusive of such formulations
reflecting customary anti-dilution provisions, the holder will have
the right, but not the obligation, in its sole discretion, to
substitute the variable price for the conversion price.

                   About Helios and Matheson

Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. (NASDAQ: HMNY) --
http://www.hmny.com/-- provides information technology consulting,
training services, software products and an enhanced suite of
services of predictive analytics.  Servicing Fortune 500
corporations and other large organizations, HMNY focuses mainly on
BFSI technology verticals.  HMNY's solutions cover the entire
spectrum of IT needs, including applications, data, and
infrastructure.  HMNY is headquartered in New York, NY and listed
on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol HMNY.

Helios and Matheson reported a net loss of $7.38 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net loss of $2.11 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  

As of June 30, 2017, Helios and Matheson had $12.75 million in
total assets, $2.06 million in total liabilities and $10.68 million
in total shareholders' equity.

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, net cash provided by
financing activities was $3.9 million as compared to $0 for the six
months ended June 30, 2016.  In management's opinion, there is
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern through one year after the issuance of the
accompanying financial statements.  Management has evaluated the
significance of the conditions in relation to the Company's ability
to meet its obligations and concluded that without additional
funding the Company will not have sufficient funds to meet its
obligations within one year from the date of the condensed
consolidated financial statements were issued.  While management
continues to plan on raising additional capital from investors to
meet operating cash requirements, there is no assurance that
management's plans will be successful.


HIGH COUNTRY FUSION: Wants to Use Cash Collateral Through Nov. 30
-----------------------------------------------------------------
High Country Fusion Co., Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Idaho to use cash collateral of Banner Bank
commencing Oct. 1, 2017, after the original approval expires
through the date debtor closes on the sale of its assets,
confirmation of its filed Chapter 11 plan or Nov. 30, 2017, which
ever first occurs.  

The Debtor also applies for permission to obtain secured credit.

A final hearing will be conducted at 9:00 a.m. on Oct. 4, 2017.
Objections to the continued cash collateral use must be filed on or
before five days before the hearing.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Aug. 8, 2017, the
Court issued a final order authorizing the Debtor to use cash
collateral for the period from July 12, 2017, through and including
Sept. 30, 2017, solely for the purposes and in the amounts set
forth in the Revised Budget, which provides total operating
expenses of $265,862 for the period of July 13 through July 31,
2017, $291,947 for the month of August 2017, and $319,847 for the
month of September 2017.

The cash collateral, which Debtor desires to use, consists of
$6,651,897.34.  The Debtor will use the proceeds from the Accounts
Receivable to pay expenses.  The Debtor will generate new
receivables and purchase new inventory after the Petition.  

The Debtor tells the Court it has exhausted all potential sources
of secured or unsecured indebtedness enabling it to pay its ongoing
operating expenses.  The amount of cash collateral that was
estimated to be on hand on the Petition Date is $6,651,897.34.

The Debtor says that the amount of the replacement lien, offered as
adequate protection to Banner Bank, and any other creditor that
claims a lien in the cash collateral will not exceed the amount of
cash collateral requested and will be a lien on Accounts Receivable
and inventory and proceeds acquired after April 27, 2017.  The
priority of the lien will be in the same priority as existed in the
Petition Date.

The adequate protection to be provided to Banner Bank and any other
entity proving an interest in the cash collateral will be the grant
of a postpetition lien in the postpetition accounts receivable,
inventory and proceeds.

Additional adequate protection being offered to Banner Bank to be
applied to principal include:

      (1)  payment to Banner Bank of $30,000 in October 2017;

      (2)  payment to Banner Bank of $30,000 in November 2017;

      (3)  upon the sale of the inventory currently located in the

           Middle East, payment of $217,000, which is 100% of the
           cost, to Banner Bank within five business days of
           receipt of those proceeds.  The Debtor will keep the
           balance of proceeds received over $217,000.  In the
           event Debtor cannot sell the inventory for at least
           $217,000 then it may only sell for a lesser amount if
           it first obtains the written consent of Banner Bank to
           lesser price.  The Debtor will pay Banner Bank all of
           the proceeds received for the sale at approved lesser
           price.  These proceeds will be applied to the principal

           of the Banner Bank operating debt; and

     (4)  attempt to liquidate or return $500,000 of inventory.  
           When the Debtor is paid for the McElroy Inventory, the
           Debtor agrees to pay Banner Bank 80% of its cost of
           that inventory to be applied to principal on the
           operating note held by Banner Bank.  If the Debtor
           cannot locate buyer(s) for this inventory then the
           Debtor will also approach the supplier McElroy to
           request McElroy to buy back the inventory for a credit
           of 80% on the Debtor's cost of this inventory.  If
           McElroy will take back this inventory and give credit
           of 80% then Debtor shall utilize this credit against
           future purchases of inventory from McElroy.  When the
           Debtor is paid for these future purchases of inventory,

           which sales were generated using the credit on hand
           with McElroy, it will pay the same amount used in
           credit to Banner Bank within five business days of
           receipt of the proceeds from the customer.  The Debtor
           will not be authorized, without Banner Bank's written
           consent, to sell the McElroy Inventory for less than
           80% of its cost.  In the event Banner Bank consents to
           a sale for less than 80% of the cost then the Debtor
           will pay all proceeds, less freight to Banner Bank
           within five days of the receipt of those proceeds from
           the buyer.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/idb17-40347-131.pdf

                  About High Country Fusion Co.

High Country Fusion Co., Inc., manufactures, sells, rents and
services various pipe products to agricultural, municipalities,
mines and other commercial operations in its market areas in Idaho,
Utah, North Dakota, the Pacific Northwest and the Intermountain
West.

Based in Fairfield, Idaho, High Country Fusion Co., Inc., sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Idaho
Case No. 17-40347) on April 26, 2017.  The Debtor estimated its
assets and debt at $1,000,001 to $10,000,000.

The case is assigned to Judge Jim D. Pappas.

Cosho Humphrey LLP is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor
hired Source Capital & Consulting, LLC, as financial advisor.


HIGH STANDARD: A. Aronstein Can Conduct Additional Discovery
------------------------------------------------------------
Alan Aronstein filed an adversary proceeding against High Standard
Manufacturing Company, Inc., seeking declaratory judgments to
determine the ownership of International Armament Corporation,
Crusader Gun Company Inc., and Firearms International, Inc.

On December 12, 2016, High Standard submitted its initial
disclosure pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A).  The disclosure named Stan
Chapman, Alan Aronstein, Richard Fuqua, Jim Gray, and Scott
Aronstein as individuals having discoverable information. However,
the contact information section for Jim Gray and Scott Aronstein
stated "unknown at this time, will supplement."

During the final pretrial conference held on April 17, 2017, High
Standard submitted its witness and exhibit list for use in the
trial, which was set for June 16, 2017. The witness list included
the four individuals identified in High Standard's initial
disclosure, as well as several other individuals that were not
identified in High Standard's initial disclosure.

Although Judge Marvin Isgur of the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Texas will not exclude High Standard's
witness testimony, he orders the trial to continue to allow Alan
Aronstein to conduct additional discovery.

Moreover, Judge Isgur allows Aronstein's own witnesses and
exhibits, previously excluded, to be offered at the continued
trial.

High Standard failed to meet its Rule 26 disclosure obligations.
Based on that failure, Aronstein filed his motion to exclude the
testimony of High Standard's witnesses on June 14, 2017.

On June 16, 2017, the Court commenced the trial in this proceeding,
and the exclusionary issue, which had not been raised at the final
pre-trial conference, was raised at trial.

The Court finds that, in addition to making its disclosure well
after the deadline, High Standard also failed to provide the
address or telephone number for both Jim Gray and Scott Aronstein.
In its brief, High Standard does not argue that the addresses and
telephone numbers were unknown. Additionally, High Standard does
not argue that the intended witnesses are to be used solely for
impeachment. Consequently, the Court finds High Standard's failure
to timely identify these witnesses before the Initial Disclosure
Deadline, as well as its failure to provide the address and
telephone number for Jim Gray and Scott Aronstein, falls within the
scope of Rule 37(c).

Rule 37(c) provides that a party who fails to disclose information
"shall not, unless such failure is harmless, be permitted to use as
evidence at a trial... To evaluate whether the Rule 26 violations
are harmless, the Fifth Circuit weighs four factors: (1) the
importance of the evidence; (2) the prejudice to the opposing party
of including the evidence; (3) the possibility of curing such
prejudice by granting a continuance; and (4) the explanation for
the party's failure to disclose.

High Standard asserts that its late disclosure was due to an
inability to tell what was in dispute. High Standard claims there
was no answer on file at the time of the initial disclosure's due
date and that Aronstein left the corporation in "disarray...
[which] made it impossible to determine at the time what exactly
what testimony would be required, or what relevant documents were
available." However, Rule 26 requires the disclosure of parties
that are "likely to have discoverable information... that the
disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses...
Accordingly, High Standard is not relieved of its duty to disclose
due to a lack of anticipation and foresight.

High Standard further argues that any prejudice to Aronstein "could
have been addressed at the time by the Plaintiff, but he failed to
act," and that the disclosures were made prior to the discovery
deadline. Additionally, High Standard asserts that the individuals
included in the initial disclosure were individuals whom Aronstein
had worked for and with for decades, and thus there was no surprise
or prejudice to Aronstein.

The Court explains that prejudice analysis focuses more on the
effect the nondisclosure has on the other party's ability to
prepare for trial rather than the prejudice which may occur if the
evidence is used at trial. Despite Aronstein's failure to bring
High Standard's violation to the Court's attention at an earlier
date, the Court points out that ultimate focus of the analysis
rests on whether High Standard's untimely disclosure prejudiced
Aronstein's ability to prepare for trial. At the time High Standard
made its untimely disclosure, there were only 18 days, including
Christmas, remaining for discovery. This left a short amount of
time for Aronstein to depose the witnesses and prepare for trial.
Accordingly, the Court finds that the prejudice factor weighs in
favor of Aronstein.

Aronstein does not contend that a continuance would not cure the
prejudice. High Standard argues that a continuance may not be
feasible but does not oppose a continuance to allow Aronstein to
depose the untimely disclosed witnesses. The Court finds that a
continuance allowing Aronstein to conduct depositions of the
untimely disclosed witnesses would cure the prejudice caused by
High Standard's failure.

While the factors of High Standard's explanation for its untimely
disclosure and the resulting prejudice to Aronstein weigh in favor
of Aronstein, the Court finds that equitable factors demand a
remedy short of exclusion of the evidence. Consequently, the Court
denies Aronstein's motion to exclude but grants a continuance to
allow Aronstein to conduct discovery on the testimony of High
Standard's untimely disclosed witnesses.

Moreover, Aronstein's evidence was largely excluded by Aronstein's
unjustified failure to produce any requested discovery materials
until well after the close of discovery. Additionally, based upon
the Court's broad discretion in leveling sanctions for violations
of Rule 37, the Court allows for the inclusion of Aronstein's
previously excluded witnesses and exhibits in order to hold a trial
on the full merits of the case.

The Case is IN RE: HIGH STANDARD MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.; fka
HI STANDARD; fka HIGH STANDARD; fka INTERARMS; fka AMT, Chapter 11,
Debtor(s). ALAN L ARONSTEIN, Plaintiff(s). v. HIGH STANDARD
MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Defendant(s), Case No. 15-33794,
Adversary No. 16-3133, (Bank. S.D. Tex.).

A full-text copy of the Memorandum Opinion dated August 24, 2017,
is available at https://is.gd/ZLPjKp from Leagle.com.

Alan L Aronstein is represented by Gaynell Paul Matherne, Attorney
at Law

          About High Standard Manufacturing Company

High Standard Manufacturing Company, Inc., a firearms manufacturer
and dealer based in Houston, Texas, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 15-33794 ) on July 16, 2015.  The Hon.
Marvin Isgur presides over the case.  Johnie J. Patterson, Esq., at
Walker & Patterson, P.C., served as bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
both assets and liabilities. The petition was signed by Stan
Chapman, vice president of administration.


INT'L MANUFACTURING: Tribe's Bid to Dismiss Clawback Suit Denied
----------------------------------------------------------------
In connection with the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding of
International Manufacturing Group, Inc., appellee Beverly
McFarland, as Chapter 11 Trustee for the estate of IMG, initiated
an adversarial proceeding against appellant Jamestown S'Klallam
Tribe, seeking to avoid and recover the value of certain allegedly
fraudulent transfers.  In the bankruptcy court, the Tribe filed a
motion to dismiss trustee's First Amended Complaint. The Tribe is
now appealing from the bankruptcy court's order denying that
motion.

Upon review of the case, Judge William B. Shubb of the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern of District of California affirmed
the bankruptcy court's order denying the Tribe's motion to
dismiss.

The Tribe argues the bankruptcy court erred in refusing to dismiss
the First Amended Complaint on the ground that neither it nor the
original Complaint was properly served on the Tribe. The Tribe
argues that it cannot properly be served by mail and that even if
service by mail were sufficient, it never authorized W. Ron Allen,
the Tribe's Council Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, to accept
service of process on its behalf.

The court notes that the stipulation that the Tribe and trustee
entered into on June 27, 2016, did not mention any deficiencies in
service and expressly stated that "the Trustee served the Complaint
on May 26, 2016." On July 15, 2016, the Tribe filed a request that
all documents required to be served be sent to its local counsel
and its attorneys at Williams Kastner & Gibbs. It was not until the
following month, on August 4, 2016, that the Tribe finally raised
the service issues for the first time.

Here, it is clear that the summons was served by mail and received
by both the Tribe's Williams Kastner & Gibbs attorneys and W. Ron
Allen. Accordingly, based on the Tribe's conduct, the fact that
service by mail is the default mode of service of process in
bankruptcy matters, and that the Tribe received actual notice, the
court finds that service was effective.

The Tribe also contends the bankruptcy court incorrectly found good
cause for the appellee's failure to properly serve the Tribe within
the requisite 90-day period and thereby erred in extending the time
for service of summons. The Tribe takes the position that there was
no service, and thus there could be no "good cause" for an
extension of service. The Court finds, however, that service was
proper.

It is undisputed that the Tribe had actual notice of the action
within the 90-day period. During that time, the Tribe's attorney
signed a stipulation in which she agreed to a deadline for the
Tribe to respond to the complaint, thus indicating that the Tribe
acknowledged it had been served.

The appeals case is JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE, Appellant, v.
BEVERLY N. McFARLAND, Chapter 11 Trustee, International
Manufacturing Group, Inc., Appellee, Case No. 2:17-cv-00293-WBS
(E.D. Cal.).

The adversary proceeding is JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE, Appellant,
v. BEVERLY N. McFARLAND, Chapter 11 Trustee, International
Manufacturing Group, Inc., Appellee, Adv. No. 16-02090 (Bankr. E.D.
Cal.).

The bankruptcy case is In re INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING GROUP,
INC., Debtor. JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE, Appellant, v. BEVERLY N.
McFARLAND, Chapter 11 Trustee, International Manufacturing Group,
Inc., Appellee, Case No. 14-25820-D11 (E.D. Cal.).

A copy of Judge Shubb's Memorandum and Order dated Sept. 19, 2017,
is available at https://is.gd/I5Xxxt from Leagle.com.

Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe, Appellant, represented by Daniel A.
Brown --dbrown@williamskastner.com -- Williams Kastner & Gibbs
PLLC, pro hac vice.

Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe, Appellant, represented by Julie E.
Oelsner --joelsner@weintraub.com-- Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman
Grodin Law Corporation & Shawn B. Rediger --
srediger@williamskastner.com -- Williams Kastner & Gibbs PLLC, pro
hac vice.

Beverly N. McFarland, Appellee, represented by Christopher Daniel
Sullivan -- csullivan@diamondmccarthy.com -- Diamond McCarthy LLP.

California Bank & Trust, Appellee, represented by Julie E. Oelsner,
Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin Law Corporation.

Bank of America, N.A., Appellee, represented by Brian Michael
Metcalf, O'Melveny & Myers LLP.

International Manufacturing Group, Inc., Debtor, represented by
Marc Caraska -- marc@caraskalaw.com -- Law Office Of Marc A.
Caraska.

ZB, N.A., Creditor, represented by Joel Gregory Samuels --
jsamuels@buchalter.com -- Buchalter Nemer & Peter G. Bertrand,
Buchalter Nemer.

Tracy Hope Davis, Trustee, represented by Judith C. Hotze, United
States Trustee's Office.

               About International Manufacturing

Deepal Wannakuwatte, the mastermind of a $150 million Ponzi scheme,
put himself and his company, International Manufacturing Group
Inc., into Chapter 11 after he pleaded guilty to one count of wire
fraud and agreed to a 20-year prison sentence.  The bankruptcy
filing was part of his plea bargain with federal prosecutors.  Mr.
Wannakuwatte is the former owner of the Sacramento Capitols tennis
team.

Mr. Wannakuwatte initiated his personal Chapter 11 case on May 30,
2014.  Hank Spacone was appointed as trustee for Wannakuwatte's
Chapter 11 estate.  Betsy Kathryn Wannakuwatte and Sarah Kathryn
Wannakuwatte also have pending Chapter 7 cases.

Mr. Wannakuwatte also submitted a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
for IMG on May 30, 2014 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 14-25820) in
Sacramento.  The case is assigned to Judge Robert S. Bardwil.  The
Debtor tapped Marc A. Caraska, in Sacramento, as counsel.

In June 2014, Beverly N. McFarland was appointed as Chapter 11
trustee for IMG. She tapped Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby &
Pascuzzi LLP as her bankruptcy counsel; Diamond McCarthy LLP as her
special litigation counsel; Gabrielson & Company as accountant; and
Karen Rushing as bookkeeper outside the ordinary course of
business.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 7 appointed a three-member unsecured
creditors panel in IMG's case comprising of Byron Younger, Janine
Jones, and Steve Whitesides.


INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS: Regains Compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule
------------------------------------------------------------------
Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc., announced that on Sept. 18,
2017, the Company received a letter from The Nasdaq Stock Market
LLC stating that the Company has regained compliance with Listing
Rule 5605(c)(2), which requires the Company to maintain three audit
committee members on its Board of Directors.  Nasdaq has determined
that since the Company has appointed Dr. Felice Schnoll-Sussman to
its Board of Directors and audit committee, it has regained
compliance with the Listing Rule.

Jack E. Stover, president and CEO of Interpace Diagnostics, stated,
"We are pleased that the Company has regained compliance with all
NASDAQ listing requirements and can continue to transform itself
for growth."

                    About Interpace Diagnostics

Interpace Diagnostics -- http://www.interpacediagnostics.com/-- is
a fully integrated commercial company that provides clinically
useful molecular diagnostic tests and pathology services for
evaluating risk of cancer by leveraging the latest technology in
personalized medicine for better patient diagnosis and management.
The Company currently has three commercialized molecular tests;
PancraGEN for the diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer from
pancreatic cysts; ThyGenX, for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer from
thyroid nodules utilizing a next generation sequencing assay and
ThyraMIR, for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer from thyroid nodules
utilizing a proprietary gene expression assay.  Interpace's mission
is to provide personalized medicine through molecular diagnostics
and innovation to advance patient care based on rigorous science.

BDO USA, LLP, in Woodbridge, New Jersey, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from continuing operations that raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.

Interpace reported a net loss of $8.33 million on $13.08 million of
net revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, following a net loss
of $11.35 million on $9.43 million of net revenue for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015.  For the fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016, the
Company had an operating loss of $6.4 million.  From Sept. 30,
2016, through Dec. 31, 2016, the Company provided working capital
by extending its payables primarily by not making timely payments
on current obligations and debt incurred prior to the sale of its
CSO business, entering into payment plans, negotiating termination
agreements on commitments that were not useful to its current
business and not paying certain severance obligations to terminated
employees.

"It is anticipated that we will require additional capital to fund
our operations.  There is no guarantee that additional capital will
be raised to fund our operations in 2017 and beyond, but we intend
to meet our capital needs by driving revenue growth, containing
costs as well as exploring other options," the Company stated in
its 2016 Annual Report.

As of June 30, 2017, Interpace had $53.74 million in total assets,
$17.40 million in total liabilities and $36.34 million in total
stockholders' equity.


IRONCLAD PERFORMANCE: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee, on September 22, appointed three
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation, a
California corporation.

The committee members are:

     (1) Resources Global Professionals
         c/o Brent Waters
         17101 Armstrong Ave.
         Irvine, CA 92614
         Tel: (714) 430-6400
         Fax: (714) 428-6093
         Email: Brent.waters@rgp.com

     (2) Winspeed Sports (Shanghai) Co., LTD
         c/o Brian Mitteldorf
         Creditors Adjustment Bureau
         14226 Ventura Blvd.
         Sherman Oaks, CA 91423
         Tel: (818) 990-4800
         Email: blm@cabcollects.com

     (3) PT Sport Glove Indonesia
         c/o Mark C. Robba
         Kranoon Desa Pandowoharjo
         Sleman Yogyakarta 55512
         Indonesia
         Tel: +62811875161
         Email: mrobba@aol.com

Official creditors' committees have the right to employ legal and
accounting professionals and financial advisors, at a debtor's
expense. They may investigate the debtor's business and financial
affairs. Importantly, official committees serve as fiduciaries to
the general population of creditors they represent.

Ironclad is represented by:

     Ron Bender, Esq.
     Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill L.L.P.
     10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 1700
     Los Angeles, CA 90067
     Tel: 310-229-1234
     Email: rb@lnbyb.com

             About Ironclad Performance Wear Corp.

Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation designs and manufactures
branded performance work wear for a variety of construction,
do-it-yourself, industrial, sporting goods and general services
markets.  Since inception, the company has leveraged its
proprietary technologies to design task-specific technical gloves
and performance apparel designed to improve the wearer's ability to
perform specific job functions.

Ironclad's gloves are available through industrial suppliers,
hardware stores, home centers, lumber yards, and sporting goods
retailers nationwide; and through authorized distributors in North
America, Europe, Australia, Middle East, Asia and South America.

Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation, a California corporation and
Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation, a Nevada corporation sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D.
Calif. Case Nos. 17-12408 and 17-12409) on September 8, 2017.
Geoffrey L. Greulich, chief executive officer, signed the
petitions.  

The cases are jointly administered and are assigned to Judge Martin
R. Barash.

At the time of the filing, Ironclad California disclosed that it
had estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and liabilities
of $1 million to $10 million.  

Ironclad Nevada disclosed $16.6 million in scheduled assets and
$8.05 million in scheduled debt.


JASON MAZZEI: Mances Buying Meadville Property for $100K
--------------------------------------------------------
Jason J. Mazzei asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Pennsylvania to authorize the sale of commercial
building located at 221-223 Chestnut Street, Meadville,
Pennsylvania 16335, with a tax ID number of 20-H-9, to Frank R. and
Marilyn J. Mance for $100,000.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Sept. 28, 2017 at 10:30 a.m.

Among the Debtor's assets is the property.  He owns the Property as
evidenced by the deed recorded in the Crawford County Courthouse.


The Debtor and the Purchasers have entered into an agreement of
sale, whereby the Seller has agreed to sell and the Purchasers have
agreed to purchase the real property for $100,000.  The Debtor
brought the agreement individually as a dual agent for both himself
and the Purchasers.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Jason_Mazzei_171_Sales.pdf

The sale of the real estate is an "as is" sale and free and clear
of all liens and encumbrances and claims against the Debtor.  In
order to convey good title, it will be necessary that all these
interests, claims and encumbrances be divested as liens against the
real property and shifted to the funds realized from the sale.  The
Debtor reserves the right to challenge the validity of any lien or
claim at the time of distribution.

There are no secured mortgage liens against the Property.  The
property required repairs in order to be marketable and sold, and
McAninch Services has performed the necessary repairs, and the cost
of said repairs total $2,250.  The Debtor asks that McAninch
Services be paid at closing, and McAninch Services has agreed to
same.

Any remaining net proceeds of this sale after tax claims are
provided for will be used to pay other secured, priority and
unsecured creditors in this case pursuant to the terms of the
Debtor's Chapter 11 plan until such time as all allowed creditors
have received a 100% distribution.

The sale is subject to the approval of the Court.  It is in the
best interest of all parties since it will help the Debtor
consummate his Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.

The sale is to a "bona fide" purchaser in accordance with the
holding in In re: Abbots Dairies.  As the Debtor's plan calls for a
100% distribution, no advertising prior to a hearing is required.

The Debtor asks the Court that the settlement officer be authorized
to make the following disbursements: (i) payoff of any existing tax
liens, if any; (ii) all real estate transfer stamps; (iii) the
Court approved attorney fees, if any; (iv) Any other closing items
necessary to consummate this transaction, including but not limited
to deed preparation and recording fees, notary fees, etc.; (v) and
the balance of the net proceeds payable to any secured and priority
creditors in this case, with the remainder to be paid to allowed
unsecured creditors until such time as payments are made equal to a
100% distribution.

The settlement date per the Purchase Agreement is scheduled for
Sept. 29, 2017.

This sale is in the best interest of all parties since it will help
the Debtor consummate his Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.

The Purchasers:

         Frank R. and Marilyn J. Mance
         335 Long Drive
         Pittsburgh, PA 15241
         Telephone: (412) 596-6659
         Facsimile: (412) 327-7316
         E-mail: mancemaintenance@verizon.net

Jason Mazzei is a licensed real estate agent currently conducting
business at 416 East Second Avenue, Tarentum, Pennsylvania.  Mr.
Mazzei sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No.
16-24827) on Dec. 30, 2016.  The Debtor tapped Albert G. Reese, Jr,
Esq., at Law Office of Albert G. Reese, Jr.


JASON MAZZEI: Van Ho Buying Wilkes-Barre Property for $19K
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason J. Mazzei asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Pennsylvania to authorize the sale of residential
building located at 119 Wood Street, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania to
Danny Van Ho for $19,000.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Sept. 28, 2017 at 10:30 a.m.

Among the Debtor's assets is the property.  He owns said property
as evidenced by the deed recorded in the Luzerne County Courthouse.


The Debtor has engaged the services of a local real estate broker
to assist with the local marketing and showings of this building.
A motion to approve the retention of said agent is pending before
the Court.

The local real estate agent almost immediately procured the Buyer
for the property on behalf of the Debtor.  The Debtor and the
Purchaser have entered into an agreement of sale, whereby the
Seller has agreed to sell and the Purchaser has agreed to purchase
the real property.  The Purchaser will pay $19,000 for said
property.  There are no secured mortgage liens against the
property.  

Any remaining net proceeds of the sale after tax claims are
provided for will be used to pay other secured, priority and
unsecured creditors in the case pursuant to the terms of the
Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan until such time all allowed creditors have
received a 100% distribution.  The settlement date per the Purchase
Agreement is scheduled for Sept. 26, 2017.

The sale of the real estate is an "as is" sale and free and clear
of all liens and encumbrances and claims against the Debtor.  In
order to convey good title, it will be necessary that all these
interests, claims and encumbrances be divested as liens against the
real property and shifted to the funds realized from the sale.  The
Debtor reserves the right to challenge the validity of any lien or
claim at the time of distribution.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Jason_Mazzei_170_Sales.pdf

The Debtor asks that the settlement officer be authorized to make
the following disbursements: (i) payoff of any existing real estate
tax liens, if any; (ii) all real estate transfer stamps; (iii)
broker commission payable to Berkshire Hathaway Home Services Poggi
Realtors; (iv) Court approved attorney fees, if any; (v) any other
closing items necessary to consummate this transaction, including
but not limited to deed preparation and recording fees, notary
fees, etc.; and (vi) the balance of the net proceeds payable to any
secured and priority creditors in the case, with the remainder to
be paid to allowed unsecured creditors until such time as payments
are made equal to a 100% distribution.  The Debtor reserves the
right to challenge the validity of any lien or claim at the time of
distribution.

The sale is subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court.  It is
in the best interest of all parties since it will help the Debtor
consummate his Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.  The sale is made
in connection with, and pursuant to, the Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan.

The sale is to a "bona fide" purchaser in accordance with the
holding in In re: Abbots Dairies.

The Purchaser:

          Danny Van Ho
          102 Palk St.
          Dallas, PA 18612

Jason Mazzei is a licensed real estate agent currently conducting
business at 416 East Second Avenue, Tarentum, Pennsylvania.  Mr.
Mazzei sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No.
16-24827) on Dec. 30, 2016.  The Debtor tapped Albert G. Reese, Jr,
Esq., at Law Office of Albert G. Reese, Jr.


JTS LLC: Anchorage Property to Be Sold at Nov. 7 Auction
--------------------------------------------------------
Alyeska Title Guaranty Agency, Inc., as Trustee, will sell the real
property commonly known as 3330 Denali Street, Anchorage, Alaska
99503, at a foreclosure sale on November 7, 2017.

JTS, LLC, the owner of the property, has been declared in default
under a deed of trust it executed in favor of Northrim Bank as
Beneficiary.

As of July 31, 2017, the total payoff of a promissory note is
$1,459,099.04.

The default consists of the Trustor's failure to pay the
outstanding balance of the Note on June 30, 2017.  All sums under
the Note are due in full.  The amount of the obligation secured as
of July 31, 2017 is:

     $1,239,399.61 Current Principal
        128,286.87 Interest (Daily accrual of $237.6930759)
         11,666.53 Late Charges
         43,844.70 Collateral Expense
         34,347.83 Legal Expense
          1,453.50 T&I Expense
            100.00 Reconveyance Fee
     -------------
     $1,459,099.04 Total Payoff

The amount due will increase by the amount of interest at 6.00%,
per annum after July 31, 2017 (currently $237.69 per diem), and by
future late fees, foreclosure legal fees, foreclosure costs
(including $3,907.00 for the Trustee's Sale Guaranty), and by any
sums properly advanced or expended under the terms of the Deed of
Trust with interest as provided under the Note.

The Deed of Trust is an encumbrance with a fourth priority
position.

The Real Property is further encumbered by recorded deeds of trust
securing these obligations:

     First position: A deed of trust dated February 21, 2012, and
recorded on February 28, 2012 in the Anchorage Recording District,
Third Judicial District, State of Alaska, as Instrument No.
2012-010057-0.  The beneficiary named in the deed of trust is
Northrim Bank.  The amount of the obligation secured by the deed of
trust as of July 31, 2017 is as follows:

     $4,493,116.78 Principal
         18,464.87 Interest (Daily accrual of $769.3693116)
          3,401.70 Late Charges
         43,824.69 Collateral Expense
         34,838.86 Legal Expense
            100.00 Reconveyance Fee
     -------------
     $4,593,746.90 Total Payoff

     Second position:  A deed of trust dated February 21, 2012, and
recorded on February 28, 2012 in the Anchorage Recording District,
Third Judicial District, State of Alaska as Instrument No.
2012-010062-0.  The deed of trust named Evergreen Business Capital
as beneficiary.  The Deed of Trust was assigned to the United
States Small Business Administration.  The amount of the obligation
secured by the deed of trust as of July 31, 2017 is as follows:

     $2,992,380.55 Principal
         30,181.56 Accrued Interest (Daily accrual of $198.56)
         90,210.88 Outstanding Interest
        120,392.44 Total Interest
     -------------
     $3,112,772.99 Total Payoff

     Third position:  A deed of trust dated February 21, 2012, and
recorded on February 28, 2012 in the Anchorage Recording District,
Third Judicial District, State of Alaska as Instrument No.
2012-010065-0.  The beneficiary named in the deed of trust is
Northrim Bank.  The amount of the obligation secured by the deed of
trust as of July 31, 2017 is as follows:

       $616,133.17 Current Principal
         63,427.34 Interest (Daily accrual of $113.9424355)
         34,057.53 Late Charges
         45,892.71 Collateral Expense
         34,838.86 Legal Expense
            100.00 Reconveyance Fee
     -------------
       $794,449.61 Total Payoff

Any purchaser of the Real Property at the foreclosure sale will
take title to the Real Property subject to the three deeds of
trust, all of which are also in default.

The Trustee elects to sell the property at 10:00 a.m. on November
7, 2017, at 303 K Street, (Boney Courthouse), Anchorage, Alaska,
and apply the proceeds to the indebtedness.  Payment must be made
at the time of sale in cash or by cashier's check.  Beneficiary may
enter a credit offset bid consisting of sums due it under the Deed
of Trust and Note.  Title to the real property will be conveyed by
Trustee's quitclaim deed without warranties of title.

To cure the default under the Note, full payoff of the Note will be
required.  As of July 31, 2017, the total payoff of the Note is
$1,459,099.04.  The amount to pay off the Note will increase after
July 31, 2017 by the amount of interest accruing at 6.00%, per
annum (currently $237.69 per diem), and by future late fees,
foreclosure legal fees, foreclosure costs (including $3,907.00 for
the Trustee's Sale Guaranty), and by any sums properly advanced or
expended under the terms of the Deed of Trust with interest as
provided under the Note.  The default may be cured and this sale
terminated if payment in full of the sum in default, and attorneys
and other foreclosure fees and costs actually incurred by the
beneficiary and trustee due to the default, is made at any time
before the date of sale stated in this notice or to such date to
which the sale is postponed.

To determine the current amount required to be paid to cure the
default under the Note, interested parties may call Tina Hohnstein
at 907-261-3398 or send an e-mail to hohnstein.tina@nrim.com

Provided, however, if notice of default has been recorded two or
more times previously under the Deed of Trust, the Trustee may
elect to refuse the cure payment and proceed with the sale.

The Trustee may be reached at:

     Alyeska Title Guaranty Agency, Inc., Trustee
     3801 Centerpoint Dr #102
     Anchorage, AK 99503
     Tel: 907-569-2842


KID BRANDS: U.S. Trustee Seeks Case Conversion to Chapter 7
-----------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that the U.S. Trustee assigned to the
Kid Brands case filed with the U.S, Bankruptcy Court a motion to
convert the Company's Chapter 11 reorganization to a liquidation
under Chapter 7.  The motion explains, "The Debtors have failed to
comply with the United States Trustee Operating Guidelines and
Reporting Requirements for Chapter 11 cases.  A review of the
docket in these cases indicates that, as of the filing of this
Motion, the Debtors have only filed monthly operating reports
through and including the month of April 2017. The Debtors' failure
to timely file monthly operating reports hinders the Court's, the
UST's, and creditors' ability to monitor the operations of the
Debtors. The unexcused failure to satisfy timely any filing or
reporting requirement is cause to convert pursuant to 11 U.S.C. A
review of the docket in this case indicates that, as of the filing
of this Motion, no disclosure statement or plan of reorganization
has been filed. As these cases continue in chapter 11, attendant
administrative costs naturally follow. Upon the events of these
cases, the Debtors' assets have been sold, and operations have
ceased. These cases have continued over a protracted period of
time, and have failed to present an exit strategy from bankruptcy.
Such circumstances present a substantial or continuing loss to or
diminution of the estates and the absence of a reasonable
likelihood of rehabilitation. Accordingly, cause to convert these
cases to chapter 7, or alternatively dismiss the cases, is present.
The UST further submits that conversion would be in the best
interest of creditors. Conversion would result in the appointment
of an independent trustee who would liquidate any remaining assets,
investigate whether there are any outstanding recoveries to pursue,
and disburse any remaining cash."

The Court scheduled a November 6, 2017 hearing on the motion,
according to the report.

                        About Kid Brands

Based in Rutherford, New Jersey, Kid Brands, Inc., is a designer,
importer, marketer, and distributor of infant and juvenile consumer
products. Its operating subsidiaries consist of Kids Line, LLC,
CoCaLo, Inc., Sassy, Inc., and LaJobi, Inc.

Citing their inability to raise capital due to contingent
liabilities and operational issues, Kid Brands and six of its U.S.
subsidiaries each filed a voluntary petition (Bankr. D.N.J. Lead
Case No. 14-22582) on June 18, 2014.  The Court approved the joint
administration of their cases.  Kid Brands Inc. disclosed $921,358
in assets and $47,947,589 in liabilities as of the Chapter 11
filing.

Judge Donald H. Steckroth presides over the cases.  

Lowenstein Sandler LLP represents the Debtors in their
restructuring effort.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is the Debtors' financial advisor, and
GRL Capital Advisors acts as restructuring advisors.  GRL's Glenn
Langberg is the Debtors' chief restructuring officer.  Rust
Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy is the Debtors' claims and noticing
agent.

The Debtors are pursuing a sale of the assets pursuant to Section
363 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Salus Capital Partners LLC and Sterling National Bank have
committed to provide up to $49 million in DIP financing to the
Debtors.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors retained Kelley Drye
& Warren LLP as counsel, Gellert Scali Busenkell & Brown LLC as
local special counsel, and Emerald Capital Advisors Corp. as
financial advisors.


LAKEWOOD AT GEORGIA: Wants To Use Cash Collateral Until Dec. 4
--------------------------------------------------------------
Lakewood at Georgia Avenue LLC seeks permission from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland to use cash
collateral of GCCFC 2007-GG9 Georgia Avenue, LLC, until Dec. 4,
2017.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb16-26171-101.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on July 7, 2017, the
Court issued an order extending the terms and conditions of the
Interim Order Authorizing Use of Cash Collateral through and
including Aug. 15, 2017.  The Debtor and GCCFC 2007-GG9 had filed
with the Court a consent motion for entry of an interim order
authorizing the Debtor's use of cash collateral.

               About Lakewood At Georgia Avenue

Lakewood At Georgia Avenue LLC sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 16-26171) on Dec.
10, 2016.  The petition was signed by George E. Christopher,
president of managing member Lakewood Investment Corp.  At the time
of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $6.04 million in assets and
$4.35 million in liabilities.  Judge Thomas J. Catliota is the case
judge.  The Debtor is represented by DeCaro & Howell P.C.


LEA POWER: Fitch Affirms BB+ Rating on $235.8MM Sr. Secured Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the rating on Lea Power Partners, LLC's
(LPP) $235.8 million senior secured notes due 2033 at 'BB+'. The
Rating Outlook is Stable.

The rating reflects the revenue stability provided by LPP's
fixed-price tolling style agreement with Southwestern Public
Service (SPS; BBB/Stable), which effectively retains natural gas
supply risk. The debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) averages 1.38x
though maturity in the Fitch rating case, with an overall declining
coverage profile and a minimum DSCR of 1.20x in 2032.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Stable Revenue Profile (Revenue Risk: Midrange)
The project is supported by a 25-year tolling agreement with SPS
under which SPS purchases capacity, energy and ancillary services
through 2033. Capacity payments provide roughly 80%-90% of the
total revenues at a fixed price over the term of the power purchase
agreement (PPA).

Mitigated Supply Risk (Supply Risk: Stronger)
The PPA with SPS is structured as a tolling agreement, largely
eliminating price and volume risks associated with natural gas
supply. SPS is responsible for providing fuel to the project
facility.

Stabilized Operating Performance (Operation Risk: Midrange)
The project has maintained high availability, supplementing fixed
contracted revenues with dispatch-based payments. Despite
historical variability during major overhaul years, the long-term
service agreement (LTSA) with Mitsubishi Power Systems Americas,
Inc. (Mitsubishi) has helped to smooth operating costs over the
contract term, which expires in 2024.

Typical Debt Structure (Debt Structure: Midrange)
Structural features include a six-month debt service reserve,
working capital reserve, and a major maintenance reserve based on
100% of the current-year overhaul expenses and 50% of the following
year's expenses. Fitch views liquidity as typical for a thermal
power project. The overall declining DSCR profile is a weakness,
notwithstanding the fixed-rate, fully-amortizing debt structure.

Financial Metrics: Despite early operational challenges that pushed
DSCR ratios near breakeven, historical DSCRs have averaged 1.34x
since 2012 with a LPP 2017 forecast DSCR of 1.35x. Under Fitch's
rating case conditions, including a 10% increase to operations and
maintenance expenses as well as lower (95%) availability, DSCRs are
projected to average 1.38x through debt maturity with a minimum of
1.20x in 2032.

PEER GROUP

Lea Power's peers include Kleen Energy Systems, LLC (Kleen;
BB/Stable) and Orange Cogen Funding Corporation (OC Funding;
BBB+/Stable). All three projects are single-site, gas-fired,
combined-cycle facilities with investment-grade off-takers. Kleen
has a similar tolling style agreement, though Kleen will be exposed
to market-based pricing when its PPA expires in 2017. Kleen has
also experienced continued cost volatility, resulting in a DSCR of
1.3x. OC Funding is rated higher due to its relatively low leverage
and robust average DSCR of nearly 4x based on a long history of
strong operating performance and resilient cash flow.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action:

-- A significant change to the cost profile, operating
    performance and/or availability that lead to sustained
    reductions in coverage below 1.30x.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action:

-- Sustained long-term overall cost reductions could result in
    improved project cash flow consistent with a higher rating
    level.



LIGNUS INC: Wants to Use DirectCapital Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------
Lignus, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of California for authorization to use cash collateral to
pay the operational expenses of its business.

In Chapter 11, the Debtor intends to remain in business, continue
its day-to-day normal operations (albeit on a downsized basis), and
restructure its debts pursuant to a Plan of Reorganization, which
the Debtor expects to propose payment in full to all creditors with
allowed claims.

The Debtor submits that the terms of its financing agreement with
DirectCapital, Inc. grants DirectCapital a lien in the Debtor's
deposits, accounts receivable, and other collateral considered to
be cash collateral pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code.  DirectCapital
is owed approximately $2,449, which amount the Debtor claims to be
relatively de minimis especially given that the Debtor has
approximately $67,000 on hand in its bank account as of Sept. 8,
2017.

Furthermore, as an ongoing business, the Debtor believes that it
will be receiving postpetition payments from customers. Likewise,
the Debtor proposes to provide DirectCapital a valid, perfected,
continuing replacement lien in an amount equal to its allowed
claim. Consequently, the Debtor asserts that DirectCapital's claim
will be adequately protected.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Sept. 8, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/UM5azu

                       About Lignus, Inc

Established in 2004, Lignus, Inc., is a privately held company
engaged in the lumber, plywood, and millwork trade.  Lignus, Inc.,
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No. 17-05475) on
Sept. 8, 2017.  The petition was signed by Jose Gaitan, CFO.  The
case is assigned to Judge Christopher B. Latham.  The Debtor is
represented by Kit J. Gardner, Esq. at the Law Offices of Kit J.
Gardner.  At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated both assets
and liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.


LIVING BENEFITS FINANCIAL: Oct. 18 Hearing on Plan Confirmation
---------------------------------------------------------------
Living Benefits Financial Group, LLC and affiliates filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas a second
amended disclosure statement regarding their first amended joint
plan of liquidation, dated Sept. 15, 2017.

This latest filing states that the disclosure statement was
approved by the Bankruptcy Court on Sept. 13, 2017. A hearing on
the confirmation of the Plan has been scheduled to commence on Oct.
18, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. Central Time.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that the Debtors
have proposed a consensual plan, where the Debtors' primary
stakeholders have agreed to release their claims against the
Debtors so that the Debtors' Estates may be administered more
efficiently during this bankruptcy case.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb15-44620-65.pdf

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb15-44620-11-66.pdf

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb15-44620-11-69.pdf

                     About Living Benefits

Headquartered in Fort Worth, TX, Living Benefits Financial Group,
LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex.
Case No. 15-44620) on Nov. 16, 2015, listing its total assets at
$11,370 and total liabilities at $4,687,972.  The petition was
signed by Marcia Shieldknight, managing director.

The Debtors are represented by H. Joseph Acosta, Esq., at
FISHERBROYLES, LLP, in Dallas, Texas.


LSC COMMUNICATIONS: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable & Affirms B+ CCR
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its rating outlook on Chicago-based LSC
Communications Inc. to stable from negative. At the same time, S&P
affirmed all ratings on the company, including its 'B+' corporate
credit rating.

U.S. commercial printing and office products company LSC
Communications Inc. has made steady progress in reducing costs and
debt and acquiring businesses to maintain its volumes and to
broaden its service capabilities, S&P noted.

S&P said, "The outlook revision reflects our expectation that LSC's
operating performance will remain relatively stable for the next 12
months as the company implements initiatives to support operating
efficiency, profit margins, and its leverage profile. We expect
adjusted EBITDA margins will approach 10% (reported EBITDA margins
in the 9% area) and adjusted leverage will trend to the low-3x area
over the next 12 to 24 months. Despite secular pressures across the
print sector and our expectation for modest EBITDA margin erosion
over our forecast period, we believe that LSC's current cash flow
generation, cash balances, and borrowing capacity provide ample
liquidity to service its debt and fund operations over the next two
years.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that LSC's adjusted
leverage will stay below 3.5x over the next 12 to 24 months despite
continued organic revenue declines due to steady operating
performance, continued cost containment efforts, and ongoing debt
repayments.

"We could lower our corporate credit rating if we believe that
leverage will increase above 3.5x, if the company experiences
liquidity pressures, or if the margin of covenant compliance
declines below 15%. A downgrade would likely result from greater
than expected revenue declines, worsening industry conditions, or
difficulties in reducing costs in line with revenues. We could also
consider a downgrade if the company pursues a more aggressive
financial policy or deviates from its stated leverage thresholds.

"Although unlikely over the next 12 months, we could raise the
rating if we become convinced that downward pressure on both volume
and price in the print industry will ease, and the company will be
able to achieve stable revenue or positive organic growth, and
maintain EBITDA margins above 10%."


MANN REALTY ASSOCIATES: Hires Keen-Summit as Real Estate Broker
---------------------------------------------------------------
Mann Realty Associates, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania to employ
Keen-Summit Capital Partners LLC, as real estate broker to the
Debtor.

Mann Realty Associates requires Keen-Summit to market and sell
these Debtor's real properties:

   a. 614 N. Front Street, Harrisburg, PA, Parcel Number
      04-035-001-000-0000;

   b. 1125 S. 9th Street, Harrisburg, PA, Parcel Number
      1-049-029-000-0000;

   c. 25 and 83 Hunterstown Road, Gettysburg, PA, Parcel
      Numbers 38G12-0112-000 and 38G12-0111A-000;

   d. Vacant Lot located at 2008 Idaville Road, York Springs,
      PA and 9509 Carlisle Pike, York Springs, PA, Parcel
      Numbers 22H03-0020-000 and 22I03-0001-000; and

   e. 123 acres known as Beaufort Terrace and located on
      Blue Ridge Road, Susquehanna Township, PA.

Keen-Summit will be paid a commission as follows:

   -- 10% of the gross proceeds if the property is vacant land;
      and

   -- 6% of the gross proceeds of the sale other than vacant
      land.

Harold Bordwin, principal and managing director of Keen-Summit
Capital Partners LLC, assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtor and its estates.

Keen-Summit can be reached at:

     Harold Bordwin
     KEEN-SUMMIT CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
     1460 Broadway
     New York, NY 10036
     Tel: (646) 381-9201

               About Mann Realty Associates, Inc.

Headquartered in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, Mann Realty Associates,
Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. M.D. Pa.
Case No. 17-01334) on March 31, 2017, estimating its assets at
between $10 million and $50 million and its debts at between $1
million and $10 million. The petition was signed by Robert M.
Mumma, II, president.

Judge Robert N. Opel II presides over the case.

Craig A. Diehl, Esq., at the Law Offices of Craig A. Diehl serves
as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

Mann Realty previously filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Pennsylvania on Jan. 10, 2017, Case No. 17-00080.  The
petition was a "pro se" filing, or case filed without attorney. The
Debtor is an affiliate of Kimbob, Inc., which sought bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 17-00836) on March 1, 2017.


MARRIOTT VACATIONS: S&P Rates Unsecured Notes Due 2022 'BB+'
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB+' issue-level and '4' recovery
ratings to Marriott Vacations Worldwide's convertible senior
unsecured notes due in 2022. The '4' recovery rating indicates
average (30%-50%; rounded estimate: 40%) recovery for noteholders
in the event of a default.

On Sept. 20, Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corp. (MVW) issued $200
million of convertible senior unsecured notes due in 2022, with an
option for the notes' initial purchasers to purchase up to an
additional $30 million. The company expects to use the proceeds for
share repurchases, transaction costs for hedging transactions
associated with the issuance, and general corporate purposes.

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned our 'BBB-' issue-level and
'1' recovery ratings to the company's existing $250 million
corporate revolver due in 2022, issued by subsidiary Marriott
Ownership Resorts Inc. The '1' recovery rating indicates very high
(90%-100%; rounded estimate: 95%) recovery for lenders in the event
of a default. The 'BBB-' issue-level rating is one notch above the
corporate credit rating despite the '1' recovery rating, because we
generally cap most debt issued by speculative-grade entities at
'BBB-', regardless of recovery rating.

"We also affirmed our 'BB+' corporate credit rating and stable
outlook on MVW.

"The corporate credit rating affirmation and stable outlook
reflects our view that MVW has sufficient leverage capacity at its
current ratings level to accommodate the impact of the convertible
notes issuance. We expect total captive-finance-adjusted debt to
EBITDA in the mid- to high-1x area in 2017 and the low- to mid-1x
area in 2018, below our 2x downgrade threshold. The company expects
to use the proceeds from the notes issuance to repurchase $40
million in common shares and to fund approximately $11 million of
transaction costs related to intended hedging transactions to
offset potential dilution from conversion of the notes to equity in
the future. The company plans to use the remaining proceeds for
general corporate purposes, which could include acquisitions. The
company has indicated its willingness to pursue acquisitions and
increase leverage, although no candidates have been identified. A
substantial acquisition that requires more capital than the amount
raised from the notes could put downward pressure on the rating.
However, a transaction of that size would likely be significant
enough to warrant a reassessment of MVW's business risk; revising
it upward could mitigate the ratings impact of some additional
leverage. We continue to assess the outlook as stable until a
near-term acquisition becomes more probable.

"S&P Global Ratings' stable rating outlook on MVW reflects our
expectation for adjusted leverage in the mid- to high-1x area in
2017 and in the low- to mid-1x area in 2018, as well as the
company's strong liquidity profile. We also believe MVW views its
good access to external financing sources as a strategic advantage.
Although growth opportunities will arise and external financing
needs may increase from time to time, we believe MVW's policy is to
manage leverage in line with the current financial risk assessment
and rating. Although we expect the company to pursue acquisition
opportunities, we believe MVW intends to manage leverage in line
with the current financial risk assessment and rating, in the
absence of a significant and transformative acquisition.

"We could lower the rating as a result of significant acquisitions
and other spending, or if MVW pursues a more rapid pace of resort
development and sales growth that would require more external
financing than we expect, in a manner that sustains
captive-finance-adjusted debt to EBITDA above the 2x area. We could
also lower ratings if risk in the captive rises meaningfully enough
to impair the parent's risk profile, which we believe could occur
if the loss ratio in the captive increases meaningfully, or if
leverage in the captive increases and is sustained above 5x debt to
equity.

"Although unlikely over the near term, we could raise the rating if
our assessment of the company's business risk improves, which would
be possible if MVW can improve and sustain our expected measure of
its adjusted EBITDA margin above 20% and we become confident the
company can meaningfully reduce anticipated EBITDA volatility over
the cycle. Also, in the unlikely event we raise the business risk
assessment, we would need to be confident that our measure of
captive-finance-adjusted debt to EBITDA would be sustained below
1.5x and that it was management's policy to keep leverage below
this level incorporating any leveraging transactions and volatility
over the economic cycle."


MEDIAOCEAN LLC: S&P Affirms 'B' CCR Amid $90MM 1st Lien Loan Add-On
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed all its ratings including the 'B'
corporate credit rating on U.S. advertising technology solutions
provider Mediaocean LLC. The rating outlook remains stable.

U.S. advertising technology solutions provider Mediaocean LLC is
issuing a $90 million fungible incremental first-lien term loan.
The company will use the proceeds to repay its $90 million
second-lien term loan.

S&P said, "At the same time, we affirmed our 'B' issue-level and
'3' recovery ratings on the company's $20 million revolving credit
facility due in 2020 and $285 million first-lien term loan due in
2022. The '3' recovery rating indicates our expectation for
meaningful recovery (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 50%) of principal
in the event of a payment default. The first-lien term loan will
total $375 million after the add-on.

"We will withdraw our 'CCC+' issue-level and '6' recovery ratings
on the second-lien term loan due in 2023 once repaid.

"The proposed refinancing is leverage-neutral and should marginally
improve cash flow with lower interest costs but will otherwise have
minimal impact on our credit assessment.

"The stable rating outlook reflects our expectation that
Mediaocean's organic revenue will increase by low- to
mid-single-digit percents, driven by continued growth in digital
ads and for FOCF to debt to remain above 5% over the next 12
months. We also expect leverage to decline to the mid-6x area by
the end of 2018 from the high-6x area at the end of 2017 due to
EBITDA growth.

"We could lower our corporate credit rating on Mediaocean if the
company's organic revenue growth is flat to slightly declining
coupled with a reduction of 300 basis points in EBITDA margins,
resulting in leverage remaining above the mid-6x area and FOCF to
debt decreasing below 5% on a sustained basis. This could result
from increased competition in its core products or the company
taking out a large debt-financed dividend.

"Although unlikely over the next year, we could raise the rating if
the company reduces leverage to below 5x on a sustained basis. This
would likely result from stronger–than-expected growth and a
financial policy that focuses on directing cash flow generation
toward debt repayment."


MICHAEL D. COHEN: Pocius Buying Bethany Beach for $285K
-------------------------------------------------------
Michael D. Cohen, M.D., P.A., and Michael David Cohen and Shari Lee
Cohen, ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland
to authorize their sale of real property located in the Sea Colony
development in Sussex County, Delaware known as 33574 Southwinds
Court, Unit 51003, Bethany Beach, Delaware, Parcel ID
#134-17.00-41.00-51003, to John J. Pocius for $285,000, subject to
higher or better offers.

One of the Debtor's assets is the Property.  To the best of their
knowledge, the Property is believed to be subject to the lien as
detailed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. in its Motion for
Relief from Stay and it's Amended Motion for Relief from Stay in
the amount of $316,965.

The Debtors listed the Property in their Schedules of Assets and
Liabilities filed with the Court with a value of $306,000.  

The Debtor filed an Application to Employ Coldwell Banker
Residential Brokerage as their Broker for the purposes of marketing
the Property, which was approved by the Court pursuant to its Order
Granting Application to Employ Broker.  Their points of contact
with Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage are Jamie Caine and
William Bjorkland, both of whom have considerable knowledge of the
residential condominium market of the Delaware beach area where the
Property is located.  Thereafter, the Debtors marketed the Property
utilizing all resources available to Coldwell Banker Residential
Brokerage.  The Property was shown approximately eight times. Only
one offer has been received for the Property.

On Aug. 10, 2017, the Debtors executed an Agreement of Sale for
Delaware Residential Property with the Buyer offering to purchase
the Property, pending approval of the Court, in the amount of
$285,000 free and clear of its liens.  The proposed sale under the
Sale Agreement includes the transfer to the Buyer of furniture
within the Property that is part of the Debtors' bankruptcy
estate.

A copy of the Sale Agreement attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/Michael_Cohen_187_Sales.pdf

The Debtors submit that any liens on the Property will attach to
the proceeds of the sale.  The Debtors ask that any deficiency that
results from the sale of the Property will be waived and will not
result in an unsecured claim.

Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage is acting as real estate
broker in the transaction and the Application notes a 3% commission
based on the sales price.  Consent for Dual Agency has been
executed by the parties to the Contract.  Any buyer's broker is to
receive 3% as commission.  

The proceeds of the sale are to be applied to the following
estimated costs: (i) estimated interest through 10/17 to Lender -
$7,745; (ii) estimated additional costs of sale - $450; (iii)
estimated broker's commission - $17,100; (iv) estimated property
taxes (due 9/30/17) - $1,125; (v) UST fee - $1,165; (vi) attorneys'
fees due YVSM (subject to separate application to and approval by
the Court) - $7,500; and (vii) estimated closing costs - $6,150.
Any and all remaining proceeds will be remitted to MetLife.

The Debtors have been attempting to sell the Property as agreed
with the consent of MetLife.  Pursuant to the Stipulation and
Consent Order Resolving Motion Seeking Relief from Stay entered
June 26, 2017 between the Debtors and Metropolitan Life, the
Debtors agreed to market and obtain a contract for sale of the
property by Sept. 20, 2017.

The Debtors represent that the purchase price set forth in the Sale
Agreement is fair and reasonable, and the sale is in the best
interests of the estate.

The Purchaser:

          John J. Pocius
          514 N. Rock Glen Road
          Baltimore, MD 21229

                   About Michael D. Cohen, M.D.

Based in Maryland, Michael D. Cohen, M.D., P.A., d/b/a Cosmetic
Surgery Center of Maryland d/b/a Belcara Health, d/b/a Belcara, is
a professional corporation engaged in the business of providing
various physician services to its patients, including but not
limited to services in the areas of plastic surgery, dermatology,
and podiatry.  Michael D. Cohen, M.D., is the sole shareholder of
the Debtor.  Shari L. Cohen, Dr. Cohen's wife, is responsible for
the business administration of the Debtor's medical practice.

Michael D. Cohen, M.D. and his wife, Shari L. Cohen jointly filed a
joint Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 16-21513) on Aug.
26, 2016.

The Company filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 16-22231) on Sept. 12,
2016.  The Debtor estimated assets in the range of $100,000 to
$500,000 and liabilities in the range of $1 million to $10 million
as of the bankruptcy filing.  The Debtors cases are jointly
administered under (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 16-22231).

The Company is represented by Irving Edward Walker, Esq., at Cole
Schotz P.C.

The Cohens are represented by Yumkas, Vidmar, Sweeney & Mulrenin,
LLC.


MOGUL ENERGY: Files for Chapter 7 Protection
--------------------------------------------
Mogul Energy International filed for Chapter 7 protection (Bankr.
S.D. Tex. Case No. 17-35467) on Sept. 20, 2017, estimating assets
of less than $1 million and debt of $1 million to $10 million.

The Company, which provides oil and gas exploration and
development, is represented by:

         Timothy Webb
         WEBB ASSOCIATES
         3401 Louisiana St, Ste 120
         Houston, TX 77002
         Tel: 713-752-0011
         E-mail: timwebblaw@aol.com

BankruptcyData.com reports that according to documents filed with
the Court, "After any administrative expenses are paid, no funds
will be available for distribution to unsecured creditors."  The
Chapter 7 petition further indicates that Mogul Energy
International owns two properties in Texas that pose, or are
alleged to pose, a threat of imminent and identifiable hazard to
public health or safety as a result of water and soil
contamination.


MOORINGS REGENCY: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for Nov. 9
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Catherine Peek McEwen of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida conditionally approved Moorings Regency,
LLC and affiliates' disclosure statement to accompany its plan of
reorganization.

Any written objections to the Disclosure Statement must be filed
with the Court and served seven days prior to the date of the
hearing on confirmation.

The Court will conduct a hearing on confirmation of the Plan on
Nov. 9, 2017, at 1:30 P.M. in Tampa, FL - Courtroom 8B, Sam M.
Gibbons United States Courthouse, 801 N. Florida Avenue.

Parties in interest must submit their written ballot accepting or
rejecting the Plan no later than eight days before the date of the
Confirmation Hearing.

Objections to confirmation shall be filed with the Court and served
no later than seven days before the date of the Confirmation
Hearing.

                    About Moorings Regency

Moorings Regency, LLC, Griffin Regency, LLC, and NJO Regency, LLC,
are single asset real estate debtors that continue to operate as
debtors-in-possession.

The Debtors filed Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case Nos.
17-04920, 17-04921 and 17-04922, respectively) on June 6, 2017.
Barry Spencer, managing member of Moorings Regency, signed the
petitions.  The cases are jointly administered.

At the time of the filing, both Moorings Regency and Griffin
Regency estimated their assets and liabilities at $10 million to
$50 million.

Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP, is the Debtors' legal
counsel.


MOUNTAIN BLUE: Wants to Use US National Bank's Cash Collateral
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mountain Blue Hotel Group, LLC, seeks permission from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia to use cash
collateral of US National Bank to allow the use of cash on hand and
revenues from retail operations for ordinary and necessary
operating expenses of the Debtor.

The Debtor believes that US National Bank as Trustee to the
Beneficial Holders COMM 2013–CCRE12 Mortgage Trust Commercial
Pass Through Certificates may assert a security interest in the
revenues of the Debtor derived from its hotel operations.  The
Debtor requests that immediate interim authorization for use of
cash collateral (to the extent cash collateral exists) be given
pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 4001(b)(2) to allow it to use cash on
hand and revenues from business operations for ordinary and
necessary operating expenses of its business.

The Debtor believes its business operations and reorganization
efforts will suffer immediate and irreparable harm if it is not
allowed to use cash collateral during the next 30 days.  The Debtor
says it cannot meet its daily operating expenses unless it is
permitted to use cash.  The Debtor tells the Court that it is
crucial for the Debtor to have the use of cash collateral to pay
employees and pay other ordinary and necessary operating expenses
in order to (a) avoid disruption of its workforce and business
operations; (b) maintain community relations and loyalty; (c)
maintain its community presence; and (d) preserve the going concern
value of the Debtor and its estate while the Debtor formulates and
implements a plan of reorganization.

As for adequate protection for the use of cash collateral, the
Debtor offers a postpetition replacement lien to USNB on cash
pursuant to and in accordance with 11 U.S.C. Sections 361(2) and
552(b): (a) to the extent of cash collateral actually expended; (b)
on the same assets and in the same order of priority as currently
exists; and (c) with Debtor's full reservation of rights with
respect to the issues set forth in paragraph 11 above.

The Debtor requests that it be permitted to use cash to pay all
quarterly fees of the U.S. Trustee as they come due.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb17-66051-7.pdf

                       About Mountain Blue

Headquartered in Bonita Springs, Florida, Mountain Blue Hotel
Group, LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D.
Ga. Case No. 17-66051) on Sept. 13, 2017, estimating its assets and
liabilities at up to $50,000 each.  Scott B. Riddle, Esq., at the
Law Office of Scott B. Riddle, LLC, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


MPM HOLDINGS: Posts $19 Million Net Income in Second Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
MPM Holdings Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting net income of $19
million on $594 million of net sales for the three months ended
June 30, 2017, compared to a net loss of $10 million on $586
million of net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2016.  The
increase in net sales reflected improved product mix in specialty
silicone products and higher quartz segment sales partially offset
by intentionally lower volumes of siloxane derivative products
primarily as a result of ceasing siloxane production at the
Leverkusen facility.

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, MPM Holdings reported a net
loss of $11 million on $1.13 billion of net sales compared to a net
loss of $28 million on $1.12 billion of net sales for the six
months ended June 30, 2016.

Segment EBITDA for the three months ended June 30, 2017, was $74
million, an increase of 12% compared with $66 million in the prior
year period.  The increase in Segment EBITDA was driven primarily
by improved demand in automotive, consumer products, and
electronics markets as well as production efficiencies, and raw
material deflation in the silicones segment.  In addition, the
quartz business segment improved by $4 million due to improved
sales, cost controls and substantially improved manufacturing
efficiencies.

As of June 30, 2017, MPM Holdings had $2.65 billion in total
assets, $2.14 billion in total liabilities and $514 million in
total equity.

"We are pleased to report strong results that reflect continued
solid performance in our diversified specialty product portfolio
and the benefits from our focus of making strategic investments to
improve our operations and cost structure, transform our
siloxane-based product lines, and support the growth of our
specialty applications," said Jack Boss, chief executive officer
and president.  "During the second quarter of 2017 we saw
year-over-year Segment EBITDA growth of 12% and a 4% increase in
specialty volumes."

Mr. Boss added: "Our integration of the Sea Lion Technology
acquisition is completed and our NXT* capacity expansion underway
at Leverkusen, Germany reinforces our focus on expanding our NXT*
silane availability to serve our global automotive customers. As we
look out into the balance of 2017, we see continued solid growth
and positive fundamentals in the markets in which we operate."

As previously announced, Momentive's global restructuring programs
and siloxane production transformation are expected to generate
approximately $48 million in annual savings.  Cumulatively through
June 30, 2017, Momentive has achieved $38 million of savings under
this program.

At June 30, 2017, Momentive had net debt, which is total debt less
cash and cash equivalents, of approximately $1.2 billion. In
addition, at June 30, 2017, Momentive had approximately $342
million in liquidity, including $128 million of unrestricted cash
and cash equivalents, and $214 million of availability under its
senior secured asset-based revolving loan facility.  Momentive
expects to have adequate liquidity to fund its operations for the
foreseeable future from cash on its balance sheet, cash flows
provided by operating activities and amounts available for
borrowings under the ABL facility.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/Y0vqCW

                      About MPM Holdings

MPM Holdings Inc. ("Momentive") -- http://www.momentive.com/-- is
a holding company that conducts substantially all of its business
through its subsidiaries.  Momentive's wholly owned subsidiary, MPM
Intermediate Holdings Inc., is a holding company for its wholly
owned subsidiary, Momentive Performance Materials Inc. ("MPM") and
its subsidiaries.  Momentive along with its subsidiaries is a
producer of silicones, silicone derivatives and functional silanes.


The Company filed a petition on April 13, 2014, with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York for
reorganization under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code.  The Plan was substantially consummated on Oct. 24, 2014, and
the Company emerged from bankruptcy.  In connection with its
emergence from bankruptcy, the Company adopted fresh start
accounting.

As a result of MPM's reorganization and emergence from Chapter 11
bankruptcy, Momentive became the indirect parent company of MPM in
accordance with MPM's plan of reorganization pursuant to MPM's
emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on the Emergence Date.  Prior
to its reorganization, MPM, through a series of intermediate
holding companies, was controlled by investment funds managed by
affiliates of Apollo Management Holdings, L.P.

Momentive, along with its subsidiaries, is a producer of silicones,
silicone derivatives and functional silanes.  Momentive is a global
leader in the development and manufacture of products derived from
quartz and specialty ceramics.

MPM Holdings reported a net loss of $163 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2016, following a net loss of $83 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015.


NATIONAL TRUCK: Wants Jan. 22 as Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline
---------------------------------------------------------------
National Truck Funding, LLC, and and American Truck Group, LLC, ask
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
to extend the Debtor's exclusive plan filing period for 90 days,
through and including Jan. 22, 2018.

The current deadline within which the Debtors must file a plan of
reorganization is Oct. 23, 2017.

The Debtors also seek a corresponding extension of the exclusive
solicitation period during which the Debtors would maintain the
exclusive right to solicit votes on the plan.

The Debtors have made no prior requests to extend the Exclusivity
Periods.

The Debtors remind the Court that their case is relatively large
and the filings on the docket are approaching the 290 mark.
Combined, the Debtors' assets total in excess of $18 million with
liabilities totaling approximately $27 million.  Because the
Debtors have developed a nationwide business that serves
independent semi-truck operators in more than 30 states by
providing them with access to vehicles through a weekly renewable
rental program with an option to purchase, their primary assets
are, by nature as semi-trucks, constantly moving and are located
throughout the U.S.  The Debtors employ approximately 80 employees
between their Mississippi corporate offices and the Mississippi
facility.

Upon filing, the Debtors immediately engaged Chaffe & Associates to
source capital for post-petition and exit financing and to effect a
sale of the businesses.  The Debtors' relationship with Chaffe has
proven fruitful, the Debtors say.  Through Chaffe, the Debtors
reached out to more than 109 parties to explore options for
post-petition and exit-financing and sale of the companies,
resulting in 43 lenders/investors signing non-disclosure agreements
and viewing financial documents and data provided by the Debtors in
a virtual data room.  The process in ongoing, but to date, the
Debtors have received at least two proposals for post-petition
financing, with another considering its proposal.

Through Chaffe, contacts with new potential lenders/investors in
ongoing, allowing the Debtors to continue to explore options and
negotiate with potential investors to obtain the best deal for the
Debtors and their creditors.  The Debtors have also engaged in
negotiations with at least four lenders/investors to explore
options for purchase of the company, with or without post-petition
financing, as well as three lenders/investors who are interested in
providing exit financing.  From those offers, the Debtors
anticipate that they will be able to negotiate favorable financing
or sale terms.

Given their reasonable prospects, the Debtors anticipate being able
to file a plan of reorganization by Jan. 21, 2018.

According to the Debtors, the filing of a bankruptcy has had a
somewhat disruptive effect on the Debtors' businesses and time is
needed to re-establish equilibrium and increase the profitability
of the companies and hence the value of the estate through
post-petition financing in preparation for a sale process.  Given
the complexity and size of this case, a relatively short amount of
time has elapsed, and the fact that the Debtors have already
received in that short amount of time so much interest from capital
sources through the work that Chaffe has done is a true indication
that a successful reorganization is possible -- if the Debtor is
given the breathing room to make it happen.

The Debtors are operating their businesses as debtors in possession
and continue to pay the bills of the estate as they have become due
and are satisfying the general requirements of a Chapter 11 case,
like preparing and filing retention agreements, monthly operating
reports, and other administrative tasks.  The Debtors have and are
reviewing executory contracts and unexpired leases to make
determinations on which to assume and reject, in order to refine
their business model.  The Debtors have also been evaluating
individual claims against the estate in order to prepare adequate
information necessary for a disclosure statement.

                  About National Truck Funding

Headquartered in Gulfport, Mississippi, National Truck Funding, LLC
-- http://nationaltruckfunding.com/-- retails and rents trucks.  
It operates as a subsidiary of American Truck Group, LLC --
http://americantruckgroup.com/

National Truck and American Truck sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D. Miss. Case Nos. 17-51243 and 17-51244) on June 25,
2017.  The petitions were signed by Louis J. Normand, Jr.,
manager.

National Truck estimated its assets and liabilities at $10 million
to $50 million.  American Truck estimated its assets and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Katharine M. Samson presides over the cases.  The Debtors
hired Lugenbuhl, Wheaton, Peck, Rankin & Hubbard as bankruptcy
counsel; Wessler Law Firm as local counsel; Lefoldt & Company PA as
accountant; and Chaffe & Associates as restructuring advisor and
investment banker.


NEW BEGINNINGS: Pinewood, 3 Others File 4th Amended Exit Plans
--------------------------------------------------------------
Pinewood Healthcare & Rehab, LLC and three other affiliates of New
Beginnings Care, LLC, filed their latest Chapter 11 plans of
reorganization, which propose to pay unsecured creditors in full.

The three NBC affiliates are Eastman Healthcare & Rehab LLC,
Edwards Redeemer Healthcare & Rehab LLC and Woodlands Healthcare &
Rehab LLC.

Under the restructuring plans filed on September 11 with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, creditors
holding Class 3 general unsecured claims will receive payments in
cash in an amount equal to 100% of their claims, plus interest at
2%.  These creditors will receive quarterly payments over the
course of five years.  

The latest plans propose to pay creditors of each company from loan
proceeds and cash flow from operations.  Copies of the fourth
amended plans are available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/NBC_4PlanPinewood.pdf
     http://bankrupt.com/misc/NBC_4PlanEastman.pdf
     http://bankrupt.com/misc/NBC_4PlanEdwards.pdf
     http://bankrupt.com/misc/NBC_4PlanWoodlands.pdf

                       About New Beginnings

New Beginnings Care, LLC, and several affiliated entities provide
nursing homes services to the residents of Georgia and Oklahoma
through four traditional nursing care facilities.  

The Debtors filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.
Tenn. Case Nos. 16-10272 to 16-10273; 16-10275 to 16-10280; and
16-10282 to 16-10287) on Jan. 22, 2016.  The Hon. Nicholas W.
Whittenburg presides over the cases. David J. Fulton, Esq., at
Scarborough & Fulton, serves as counsel to the Debtors.  The
Debtors also employed Littler Mendelson, PC, as special counsel.

New Beginnings estimated under $50,000 in assets and $1 million to
$10 million in liabilities. The petition was signed by Debbie
Jones, member.

                          *     *      *

New Beginnings of South Florida, Inc., has an amended disclosure
statement in support of the Debtor's amended Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.  The Amended Disclosure Statement is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb16-11907-100.pdf


NEW YORK CRANE: Has Final Nod to Obtain Financing From Cobra Kai
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Carla E. Craig of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of New York has entered a final order authorizing
Perry M. Mandarino, the Chapter 11 trustee for New York Crane &
Equipment Corp. President James Lomma, to obtain postpetition
financing and use cash collateral.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Aug. 31, 2017, the
Chapter 11 Trustee asked for court authorization to obtain
postpetition financing from Cobra Kai Lending LLC.  The Debtor
wants access to a $10 million delayed draw debtor-in-possession
facility.  The material terms of the DIP Facility include, among
others: (a) (i) JLJD, LLC will guarantee the Obligations up to the
amount of its interest in the equipment collateral; and (ii) South
Kearny Associates will guarantee the Obligations up to the amount
of its interest the real property collateral.  The Non-Recourse
Guarantors are serving as nonrecourse guarantors of the DIP Loan,
to the extent of their respective interests in the collateral; and
(b) the maturity date is the date that is the earliest of: (i)
Sept. 30, 2018; (ii) the effective date of a Plan of
Reorganization; (iii) entry of an order converting any of the
Chapter 11 cases to a case under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code or dismissing any of the Chapter 11 cases.

The Debtors are authorized to borrow from the Lender under the
Facility an aggregate principal amount up to $10 million and the
Non-Recourse Guarantors are authorized to guarantee the Guarantee
Obligations.

The Chapter 11 Trustee is authorized to use the proceeds of the DIP
Loans, in part, to (i) fund the working capital needs and chapter
11 administrative costs of the Debtors during the pendency of the
Chapter 11 Cases, (ii) pay fees, costs and expense of the Facility
on the terms and conditions described the Loan Documents (including
the Lender's professionals), and (iii) pay other amounts as
specified in the Budget.  The Chapter 11 Trustee will make payments
of the U.S. Trustee's quarterly fees (and any applicable interest
thereon) from unencumbered assets and the Debtors have adequate
unencumbered funds to make such payments of U.S. Trustee's
quarterly fees (and any applicable interest thereon).

The (a) Commitment Fee of 1.5% of the full Facility, (b) Funding
Fee of 1.5% of the Facility; (c) Work Fee which will serve as a
retainer for the Lender's counsel, Arent Fox LLP, and (d) Exit Fee
of 1.5% of the Advances are each approved, and the Chapter 11
Trustee is authorized and directed to pay the fees.  The Chapter 11
Trustee is also authorized and directed to pay upon demand all
other fees, costs, expenses and other amounts payable under the
terms of this final court order and the Loan Documents and all
other reasonable fees and out-of-pocket costs and expenses of the
Lender, subject to receiving a written invoice therefor.  

The Obligations will constitute senior administrative expense
claims against the applicable Debtor or its estate in the Chapter
11 cases limited to the Debtors' interest in the collateral, which
is an administrative expense claim having priority, pursuant to
Section 364(c)(1) and 507(b) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, over (a)
any and all allowed administrative expenses, and (b) unsecured
claims now existing or hereafter arising; provided for the
avoidance doubt, that the Superpriority Claim is senior to any
subordinated liens.

As security for the Obligations, the Lender is granted, on a final
basis, valid, perfected, and unavoidable security interests in and
liens upon the collateral.  

Simultaneously with the closing on the Facility and the execution
and delivery by South Kearny of the Mortgage on the Real Property
Collateral in a form acceptable for recording, the Chapter 11
Trustee is authorized and empowered to repay the Kearney Advance to
Kearney.  The DIP Credit Agreement and indefeasible satisfaction of
the Obligations in full, Kearney has preserved and not waived such
rights as he has or may have to assert (i) that he owns a 50%
interest in South Kearney, and (ii) that he is entitled to receive
50% of any net proceeds generated by any sale by the Chapter 11
Trustee of the Real Property Collateral in accordance with the sale
court order and the DIP Credit Agreement; provided, however, that
the Chapter 11 Trustee and the Committee of Unsecured Creditors
reserve all of their rights to dispute the Kearney Interests.
South Kearney will have the same right as the Committee and Gabel
to object solely to the line item in the Budget that permits
additional Advances on the terms and conditions stated in the DIP
Credit Agreement.

The Lender will have the right to credit bid the total of the
Obligations for any or all of the collateral at a sale, lease or
other disposition of the collateral outside the ordinary course of
business (including any auction or similar sales), whether pursuant
to a plan of reorganization or a motion pursuant to Section 363 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or otherwise (which credit bid rights
under Section 363(k) or otherwise will not be impaired in any
manner).

A copy of the final court order is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb16-40043-1124.pdf

                       About New York Crane

New York Crane & Equipment Corp., J.F. Lomma Inc. (De.), J.F. Lomma
Inc. (N.J.) operate crane, trucking and rigging companies doing
business in New York City and other parts of the country.  James
Lomma is the president and sole shareholder.

New York Crane, J.F. Lomma Inc. (De.), J.F. Lomma Inc. (N.J.), and
James F. Lomma filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr.
E.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 16-40043) on Jan. 6, 2016.  James F. Lomma,
president, signed the petitions.  New York Crane & Equipment
disclosed total assets of $9.8 million and total debts of $22.05
million.  

Judge Carla E. Craig presides over the cases.

The Debtors have hired Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP as
their counsel; LaMonica Herbst & Maniscalco, LLP, as special
counsel; Robert L. Friedbauer CPA PC as accountant; Marcum LLP as
financial advisor; and Pro Star Pilatus Center LLC as Broker in
relation to an Aircraft Remarketing Agreement.  LaMonica Herbst &
Maniscalco, LLP, is serving as special litigation and conflicts
counsel to James F. Lomma.

On Feb. 12, 2016, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee retained
Togut, Segal & Segal LLP as its counsel.

                          *     *     *

On Dec. 9, 2016, the Debtors filed an amended disclosure statement,
which explains their proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.
The plan proposes to pay general unsecured creditors in full.

On June 23, 2017, Perry Mandarino was appointed as the Chapter 11
trustee for James F. Lomma.


NORTHERN MEADOWS: Files Chapter 11 Liquidation Plan
---------------------------------------------------
Northern Meadows Development Co., LLC, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Washington a
disclosure statement in support of its chapter 11 plan of
liquidation, dated Sept. 13, 2017.

The Plan is designed to accomplish the further liquidation of the
Debtor's Estate and provide a mechanism for the Distribution of the
proceeds of such liquidation to beneficiaries of the Estate in the
form of holders of Allowed Claims and Allowed Equity Interests.
Under the Plan, all of the Debtor's powers, assets, and property
not transferred or distributed on or prior to the Effective Date of
the Plan shall vest in the Debtor.

The Debtor's Financial Advisor, Columbia Consulting Group, PLLC,
will become the Liquidation Manager for the benefit of the holders
of Allowed Claims.

The Liquidation Manager will oversee the marketing and sale of the
properties, establish Cash Reserves and make Distributions to the
holders of Allowed Claims and Allowed Equity Interests against the
Debtor, according to the Classes and treatment specified for each
such Class set forth in the Plan and to the priorities specified in
the Bankruptcy Code.

Class 5 unsecured claimants will receive Cash Distributions from
the Net Sale Proceeds after all claims have been paid in full from
Classes 1, 2, 3 & 4, and the Liquidation Manager has created a
reasonable reserve to pay future administrative claims. Payments to
this Class will be made on a pro rata basis to all Creditors in
this Class that have a valid approved Claim by the Liquidation
Manager.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/wawb16-13393-99.pdf

                     About Northern Meadows

Northern Meadows Development Co., LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 16-13393) on June 27, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Stephen Brisbane, manager. Judge Timothy W.
Dore is assigned to the case.  The Debtor's counsel is Donald A.
Bailey Attorney At Law. At the time of filing, the Debtor disclosed
assets of $5.49 million and debt of $6.21 million.


OAKS OF PRAIRIE: Wants to Use Illinois Bank's Cash Collateral
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Oaks of Prairie Point Condominium Association asks for
permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District
of Illinois to use cash collateral of Illinois State Bank to
replace roofs.

In order for the Debtor to continue to operate its business and
manage its financial affairs, and effectuate an effective
reorganization, it is essential that the Debtor be authorized to
use cash collateral for, among other things, maintenance and
repairs, insurance, utilities, real estate taxes, real estate
management fees, and other miscellaneous items needed in the
ordinary course of business.

The Debtor selected Hogan Exteriors, which has previously replaced
roofs at the property and has been doing emergency roof repairs for
the Debtor over the past few years.

In May 2011, the roofs suffered damage from a hail storm.  In
October 2011, Roofing Consultants Ltd. performed a roof inspection
and determined that all of the buildings had the same shingles
which showed significant deterioration and were an inferior roofing
product.  The report further concluded that the insured should
consider planning for the replacement of the roofs in the near
future to avoid any additional damage.

Since that time three of the buildings' roofs have been replaced in
2014 and three more in 2015 and the remaining buildings' roofs also
must be replaced in order to preserve the property and avoid new
claims being filed against the Debtor by unit owners who have
suffered damage to their units.

The Debtor has tried to do the minimum repairs but it has become
apparent these repairs are both insufficient and a waste of money
at this time.  

The Debtor currently has sufficient cash to pay for the roof
replacements.  The use of cash collateral to pay for the roof
replacement will preserve the value of the Debtor's assets and
thereby ensure that the interests of creditors that have or may
assert an interest in both cash collateral and the Debtor's other
assets are adequately protected.

Unless the Debtor is authorized to use cash collateral in which the
Lender asserts an interest, the Debtor will be unable to continue
to operate and manage its property without potential claims brought
by unit owners for damage to their property but also against the
Debtor for potential claims of a breach of fiduciary duty to
maintain the property.  The disallowance of the requested use of
cash will cause irreparable harm to the Debtor, its creditors and
this estate.
                  
A copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb16-80238-188.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Sept. 22, 2017, the
Court authorized the Debtor to use cash collateral during the
period Sept. 1 to 30, 2017.  In return for the Debtor's continued
interim use of cash collateral, the Lender was granted, among
others, valid and perfected, enforceable security interest in and
to the Debtor's postpetition accounts, assessments and other
receivables which are no or hereafter become property of the estate
to the extent and priority of its alleged prepetition liens, but
only to the extent of any diminution in the value of the assets
during the period from the commencement of the case through Sept.
30, 2017.

                About The Oaks of Prairie Point
                    Condominium Association

The Oaks of Prairie Point Condominium Association is an Illinois
corporation that owns and operates condominium buildings located in
Lake in the Hills, Illinois, known as "The Oaks of Prairie Point
Condominium".  

The Association sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 16-80238) on Feb. 3,
2016, estimating assets and liabilities at $1 million to $10
million.  Donna Smith, property manager, signed the petition.

The case is assigned to Judge Thomas M. Lynch.

The Debtor is represented by Thomas W. Goedert, Esq., at Crane,
Heyman, Simon, Welch & Clar, in Chicago, Illinois.


OLD FASHION BUTCHER: Unsecureds to Get 40% in 60 Monthly Payments
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Old Fashion Butcher Shop Inc. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of New York a small business disclosure
statement describing its partial repayment plan, dated Sept. 15,
2017.

General unsecured creditors are classified in Class 4 under the
plan and will receive a distribution of 40% of their allowed claims
to be distributed in 60 equal monthly payments commencing 30 days
after the Effective Date of the Plan.

The Plan will be funded by the net income received from operation
of the butcher shop. The Debtor's projected monthly cash profit was
$16,000 as of August 2017. The monthly Plan payments as calculated
shall be $13,735.70 in total.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb1-17-41006-68.pdf

                  About Old Fashion Butcher Shop

Old Fashion Butcher Shop Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-41006) on March 2,
2017.  The petition was signed by Ioannis Kukularis,
vice-president.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.

The Debtor's attorney is Corash & Hollender, PC.  Its accountant is
At Tax Accounting Solutions Corp.

No trustee has been appointed, and no committee has been formed or
appointed.


OPEXA THERAPEUTICS: Closes Merger with Acer Therapeutics
--------------------------------------------------------
Acer Therapeutics Inc. has completed the merger with Opexa
Therapeutics, Inc., under which the stockholders of Acer (including
investors in a financing that closed concurrently with the merger)
become holders of 88.8% of combined company's outstanding common
stock, with Opexa shareholders retaining 11.2%.

In conjunction with the merger, a syndicate of existing and new
investors led by TVM Capital Life Sciences invested approximately
$15.7 million in Acer (including through a conversion of
approximately $5.7 million in outstanding convertible notes)
immediately prior to closing of the merger.

"Acer's goal is to become a leading pharmaceutical company that
acquires, develops and commercializes therapies for the treatment
of patients with serious rare and ultra-rare diseases with critical
unmet medical need," said Chris Schelling, chief executive officer
and founder of Acer.  "We have committed significant resources to
rapidly advance our lead candidate EDSIVO, a potential life-saving
therapy for patients with vEDS.  We believe that the proceeds from
the concurrent financing will allow us to advance EDSIVO through
NDA submission with the FDA in the first half of 2018.  As a public
company, we now look forward to engaging with a broader pool of
investors as we seek to advance and expand our pipeline and make
multiple products available to patients over the next several
years."

                       About the Merger

Existing stockholders of Acer, as well as investors in Acer's
concurrent financing, received newly issued shares of Opexa common
stock in connection with the merger.  In the combined company: (a)
Opexa shareholders retained 11.2%, (b) Acer stockholders own 63.8%
(excluding shares issued to them in the concurrent financing), and
(c) the investors participating in the concurrent financing own 25%
(excluding shares previously held by them).  The combined company
has approximately 6.6 million shares of common stock outstanding,
following a reverse split of 1-for-10.355527.

Upon completion of the merger, Opexa was renamed Acer Therapeutics
Inc.  The combined company commenced trading on the Nasdaq Capital
Market under the symbol "ACER" on Sept. 21, 2017.

The directors and the sole executive officer of Opexa resigned from
their positions with Opexa upon the closing of the merger, and the
combined company is now under the leadership of Acer's current
executive management team with Chris Schelling serving as president
and chief executive officer.  The board of directors of the
combined company consists of 7 members: Steve Aselage, Jason
Amello, Hubert Birner, John Dunn, Michelle Griffin, Luc Marengere
and Mr. Schelling.

Additional information regarding the Merger is available for free
at https://is.gd/FTRb2m

                    About Acer Therapeutics

Headquartered in Cambridge, MA, Acer Therapeutics Inc. --
http://www.acertx.com/-- is a pharmaceutical company that
acquires, develops and intends to commercialize therapies for
patients with serious rare and ultra-rare diseases with critical
unmet medical need.  Acer's late-stage clinical pipeline includes
two candidates for severe genetic disorders for which there are few
or no FDA-approved treatments: EDSIVO (celiprolol) for vEDS, and
ACER-001 (a fully taste-masked, immediate release formulation of
sodium phenylbutyrate) for urea cycle disorders (UCD) and Maple
Syrup Urine Disease (MSUD).  There are no FDA-approved drugs for
vEDS and MSUD and limited options for UCD, which collectively
impact more than 4,000 patients in the United States.  Acer's
products have clinical proof-of-concept and mechanistic
differentiation, and Acer intends to seek approval for them in the
United States by using the regulatory pathway established under
section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or
FFDCA, that allows an applicant to rely for approval at least in
part on third-party data, which is expected to expedite the
preparation, submission, and approval of a marketing application.

                     About Opexa Therapeutics

Opexa Therapeutics -- http://www.opexatherapeutics.com/-- is a
biopharmaceutical company that has historically focused on
developing personalized immunotherapies with the potential to treat
major illnesses, including multiple sclerosis as well as other
autoimmune diseases such as neuromyelitis optica.  These therapies
are based on Opexa's proprietary T-cell technology.

Opexa incurred a net loss of $7.98 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2016, compared to a net loss of $12.01 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of June 30, 2017, Opexa had $1.98 million
in total assets, $368,547 in total liabilities and $1.61 million in
total stockbholders' equity.

Malonebailey, LLP -- http://www.malonebailey.com/-- in Houston,
Texas, issued a "going concern" qualification on the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that
the Company has incurred recurring losses, negative operating cash
flows and an accumulated deficit that raise substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern.


ORACLE OIL: Hires Timothy C. Ellender as Special Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Oracle Oil, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Louisiana to employ Timothy C. Ellender,
Jr., APLC, as special counsel to the Debtor.

Oracle Oil requires Timothy C. Ellender to:

   -- assist and represent the Debtor in the case captioned
      Oracle Oil, LLC v. EPI Consultants, Division of Cudd
      Pressure Control, Inc., Case No. 159212, Division E, 32nd
      Judicial District Court for the Parish of Terrebonne; and

   -- provide legal advice and prepare any necessary or advisable
      motions, briefs and pleadings, necessary to prosecute the
      EPI Consultants lawsuit.

Timothy C. Ellender will be paid at the hourly rate of $380. The
firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred.

Timothy C. Ellender, Jr., partner of Timothy C. Ellender, Jr.,
APLC, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person"
as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code
and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its
estates.

Timothy C. Ellender can be reached at:

     Timothy C. Ellender, Jr., Esq.
     TIMOTHY C. ELLENDER, JR., APLC
     254 Barrow St.
     Houma, LA 70360
     Tel: (985) 223-2889

                   About Oracle Oil, LLC

Oracle Oil, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 17-12391) on September 6,
2017.  Judge Elizabeth W. Magner presides over the case.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets of $10,000,001 to $50,000,000 and liabilities of
$1,000,001 to $10,000,000.  The Debtor hired The Derbes Law Firm,
LLC, as counsel, and Timothy C. Ellender, Jr., APLC, as special
counsel.


OUTER BANKS: Tinkham Family Trust Allowed to Amend Claim
--------------------------------------------------------
Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of North Carolina addresses the remaining aspects
of debtor Outer Ventures, Inc.'s amended objection to the claim of
J. Jeffrey Tinkham Family Trust.

An order denying the objection to the extent that it asserted the
North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct as a defense to the
proof of claim was entered on Dec. 19, 2016, and subsequent
hearings were held to address the remaining components of the
debtor's objection.

Judge Humrickhouse allows the objection on the grounds that the
Trust's claim is improperly calculated.

The debtor contends that the calculations put forward by the Trust
are "simply wrong" and include errors and improper allocations
dating back to 2009. Emphasizing that Tinkham was solely
responsible for all material input into the calculation process,
the debtor maintains that the Trust's claim reflects Tinkham's
self-serving interpretations of the underlying documents.
Specifically, the debtor challenged the existence and assertion of
the events of default; selection and adjustment of the applicable
interest rate; the methodology used to calculate compound interest;
the inclusion of unfounded late fees; and the failure to account
for what the debtor contends is an absolute assignment of the
promissory note dated Dec. 20, 2013.

Mr. Brotman, the CPA retained by Tinkham and the Trust to calculate
the proof of claim, testified that all the information that he
used, including amounts and dates, was provided to him by Tinkham.
He put this data into an amortization software program, which then
handled all the actual calculations. Mr. Brotman testified that in
his preparation of the calculations, he had no input into selection
or interpretation of the data used, did not verify any of the
numbers given to him by Tinkham, did not see and has no independent
knowledge of any loan documents, and did not use or rely on them.
In sum, Mr. Brotman took the numbers provided by Tinkham, plugged
them into the software program, and printed out the results. The
court does not mean to disparage Mr. Brotman's expertise as a CPA
but rather notes that in this instance, his expertise was
irrelevant because it was not used. The proof of claim calculations
is based entirely on Tinkham's personal interpretation of documents
that, in most instances, he personally drafted.

Regarding the calculation of compound interest, it appears to the
court that the Trust's underlying methodology is appropriate. The
calculation errors embodied in the proof of claim are based upon
erroneous data input rather than methodology. The Trust is entitled
to interest at the contractual annual pre-default rate of 6% per
annum compounding monthly commencing on Jan. 1, 2010 through Dec.
31, 2010, and at 7.5% per annum, compounded monthly, commencing on
Jan. 1, 2011, through the petition date.

The debtor's objection to claim therefore is allowed. The Trust is
directed to file an amended proof of claim that appropriately
credits the assignment on the date it was made, excises both late
fees, and recalculates interest in accordance with this order.

The bankruptcy case is In re: OUTER BANKS VENTURES, INC., Chapter
11, Debtor, Case No. 15-06168-5-SWH (Bankr. E.D.N.C.).

A full-text copy of Judge Humrickhouse's Order dated Sept. 19,
2017, is available at https://is.gd/DeRgq4 from Leagle.com.

Outer Banks Ventures, Inc., Debtor, represented by Gregory B.
Crampton --  gcrampton@nichollscrampton.com  -- Nicholls &
Crampton, P.A., Kevin L. Sink -- ksink@nichollscrampton.com --
Nicholls & Crampton, P.A. & John G. Trimpi, Trimpi & Nash, LLP.

Headquartered in Corolla, North Carolina, Outer Banks Ventures,
Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.N.C.
Case No. 15-06168) on Nov. 12, 2015, with total assets of $8.62
million and total liabilities of $2.04 million. The petition was
signed by Richard C. Willis, president.


P.E. O'HALLORAN: May Use Cash Collateral of Machias Until Sept. 30
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Michael A. Fagone of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the
District of Maine has granted P.E. O'Halloran, Inc.'s request for
permission to use cash collateral of Machias Savings Bank until
Sept. 30, 2017.

A final hearing on the Debtor's request will be held on Sept. 28,
2017, at 2:00 p.m.

The Lender has consented to the Debtor's cash collateral use.

The Court finds that the Debtor needs the immediate use of cash
collateral for the purpose of paying expenses and that the Debtor
will suffer immediate and irreparable injury if it is not
immediately permitted to use cash collateral for these purposes.

MSB is granted replacement liens, in all cash collateral of the
Debtor acquired after the Petition Date and in the direct and
indirect proceeds thereof.  

A copy of the Order is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/meb17-10515-33.pdf

                     About P.E. O'Halloran

P.E. O'Halloran, Inc. -- http://www.peohalloraninc.com/-- offers
heavy haul and oversize load transportation, roadside repair, and
heavy recovery and towing services.  The Company opens 24 hours a
day and 365 days a year with operations in Bangor, Newburgh and
Ellsworth, Maine.  It is the sole owner of a building and 8.82
acres located at 525 Bangor Road, Ellsworth, Maine, valued at
$236,700.

P.E. O'Halloran filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D. Maine Case No. 17-10515) on Sept. 12, 2017, disclosing $1.39
million in total assets and $2.26 million in total liabilities.
The petition was signed by Steven O'Halloran, owner.

Judge Michael A. Fagone presides over the case.

James F. Molleur, Esq., at Molleur Law Office, serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

Jason Mills at BCM Advisory Group is the Debtor's financial
consultant.


PATTY DEWITT: Hadoxes Buying Morgantown Property for $2.4 Million
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Patty DeWitt asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia parcels of real property are located
along Van Voorhis Rd in Morgantown, Monongalia County, West
Virginia: (i) Union 12,  Map 50 Parcel 6001, PT 1.36 AC West Run
(apartment building); (ii) Union 12,  Map 50 Parcel 6002, PT 1.36
AC West Run ( two apartment buildings); (iii) Union 21, Map 1.5,
.617 AC Sur (two buildings) 1445/1447; (iv) Union 21, Map 2, .77 AC
West Run (flood area); and (v) Morgan 4, Map 2, 3.586 AC Sur West
Run (flood area), together with all improvements, equipment,
furnishings, fixtures, inventory, etc, located thereon, to Robert
B. and Bonita Sue Hadox for $2,375,000, subject to overbid.

The Buyers of the Property offered to pay $2,375,000, with
$1,935,000 down and $440,000 being financed by the Debtor.  The
major secured creditor, United Bank, consents to the Motion and
sale.  The earnest money deposit is $10,000.

Howard Hanna Premier Properties by Barbara Alexander, LLC, by Kay
Alexander and Rob Young, were approved by the Court at act as the
Realtor for the Debtor, were instrumental in soliciting the Hadox
offer after extensive marketing, and will ask approval of the
commission due, together with monies and authority for rental
management through closing, with maintenance expenses not included
in the monthly management fee.

The Debtor advised the Court at hearing that said proposed sale
expressly was subject to the filing of objections thereto by
parties in interest or the receipt of higher and better offers.
She moves such upset bids be received by that date and time certain
of Oct. 13, 2017 to be further established in the Notice.  

Further, pursuant to the Bidding Procedures contained in the
Notice, the Court is asked to enter its Order granting the
preliminary procedural relief requested in the Sale Hearing on Nov.
17, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.  The Notice provides that, as contemplated in
the Bidding Procedures and as directed, in the event of the receipt
by the Debtor of any higher and better offers for the purchase of
the Property, the Debtor, acting through Howard Hanna, would
conduct an auction between any competing qualified bidders
immediately prior to said hearing on that same date.

The Debtor proposed to sell the Property free and clear of liens
and encumbrances, with the same to attach to the sale proceeds.
The sale proceeds will be disbursed as follows: first, to Howard
Hanna in payment of real estate sales commission; second, to all
usual and ordinary, reasonable and necessary costs and expenses of
Closing (including but not limited to real estate taxes, UST sales
fees, and tax liens); third, to the payment to United (as directed
by their respective counsel) upon the indebtedness secured by the
lien of said secured creditor upon the Property; and fourth, the
remainder of said sale proceeds, payable to the Debtor’s counsel
in trust for  the benefit of entitled creditors and parties in
interest, whether pursuant to any confirmed plan, or if no plan be
confirmed, as this Court may further order after notice and
hearing.

The Purchaser:

          Robert B. and Bonita Sue Hadox
          55 Woodland Drive
          Fairmont, WV 26554

Counsel for the Debtor:

          John F Wiley, Esq.
          J FREDERICK WILEY, PLLC
          PO Box 1381
          Morgantown, WV 26507

               - and -

          Todd B. Johnson, Esq.
          JOHNSON LAW, PLLC
          PO Box 519
          Morgantown, WV 26507

Patty JoAnne DeWitt sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. W.Va.
Case No. 17-00120) on Feb. 2, 2017.  The Debtor tapped J. Frederick
Wiley, PLLC, and Johnson Law, PLLC, as counsel.  Howard Hanna
Premier Properties by Barbara Alexander, LLC, by Kay Alexander and
Rob Young were approved by the Court as the Realtor for the Debtor.


PEEKAY ACQUISITION: Hires Rust/Omni as Administrative Agent
-----------------------------------------------------------
Peekay Acquisition, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to
employ Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy, as administrative agent to
the Debtors.

Peekay Acquisition requires Rust/Omni to:

   (a) assist with, among other things, balloting and tabulation
       and calculation of votes, as well as preparing any
       appropriate reports, as required in furtherance of
       confirmation of plans of reorganization or liquidation;

   (b) generate an official ballot certification and testify, if
       necessary, in support of the ballot tabulation results;

   (c) gather data in conjunction with the preparation, and
       assist with the preparation, of the Debtors' schedules
       of assets and liabilities and statements of financial
       affairs;

   (d) manage any distributions pursuant to a confirmed plan
       of reorganization or liquidation; and

   (e) provide such other claims processing, noticing,
       solicitation, balloting and administrative services
       described in the Services Agreement, but not included
       in the Section 156(c) Application, as may be requested
       from time to time by the Debtors.

Rust/Omni will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Equity Services                   $168.75
     Senior Consultants                $131.25 - $146.25
     Technology/Programming             $82.50 - $123.75
     Consultants                        $78.75 - $105
     Project Supervisors                $63.75 - $78.75
     Project Specialists                $48.75 - $63.75
     Clerical Support                   $26.25 - $37

Prior to the Petition Date, Rust/Omni received a retainer payment
of $5,000 from the Debtors.  Rust/Omni received a pre-petition
payment of $2,158.17 from the retainer and holds the balance of
$2,841.83 as security for the payment of fees and expenses incurred
under the Services Agreement.

Rust/Omni will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Paul Deutch, executive managing director of Rust Consulting/Omni
Bankruptcy, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estates.

Rust/Omni can be reached at:

     Paul Deutch
     RUST CONSULTING/OMNI BANKRUPTCY
     1120 Avenue of the Americas, 4th Floor
     New York, NY 10035
     Tel: (213) 302-3560
     Fax: (213) 302-3820

                   About Peekay Acquisition, LLC

Headquartered in Auburn, Washington, Peekay --
http://www.loverspackage.com/-- is a specialty retailer of a broad
selection of lingerie, sexual health and wellness products and
accessories. Peekay currently owns and operates 47 retail stores
across six states under the brand names "Christals," "LoVerS,"
"ConReV" and A. "A Touch of Romance."

Peekay Acquisitions, LLC and affiliates, each sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-11722) on Aug. 10,
2017.  The petitions were signed by Albert Altro, chief
restructuring officer.

Peekay Acquisition estimated its assets between $10 million and $50
million and its debts between $50 million and $100 million.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon presides over the cases.

Landis Rath & Cobb LLP serves as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.
The Debtors hired SSG Advisors, LLC as investment banker and
Traverse, LLC as financial advisor.  Rust Consulting/Omni
Bankruptcy serves as claims and noticing agent.


PENINSULA AIRWAYS: Wants to Use Cash Collateral Through Dec. 31
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peninsula Airways, Inc., doing business as PenAir, filed a
supplemental motion with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Alaska, seeking authorization for the use of cash collateral,
and approval of the proposed cash collateral budget which provides
total cash outflow of $25,055,315 for weeks ending Sept. 17 through
Dec. 31, 2017.

The proposed Order provides that the $2,500 weekly payment shown on
the Budget will be paid as adequate protection to First National
Bank Alaska, and will be credited to the line of credit obligation
owed by Debtor to First National Bank.  However, the Budget does
not include the three $25,000 Aviation Consulting monthly fees to
Marsh USA, Inc., that are referenced on the Debtor's motion to pay
insurance.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Supplemental Motion, dated Sept.
7, 2017, is available at https://is.gd/eXCovv

                    About Peninsula Airways

Founded in 1955 by Orin Seybert in Pilot Point, Alaska, Peninsula
Airways, Inc., doing business as PenAir, is one of the oldest
family owned airlines in the United States and is Alaska's second
largest commuter airline.  Its main base is Ted Stevens Anchorage
International Airport, with other hubs located at Portland
International Airport in Oregon, Boston Logan International Airport
in Massachusetts and Denver International Airport in Colorado.
PenAir currently has a code sharing agreement in place with Alaska
Airlines with its flights operated in the state of Alaska as well
as all of its flights in the lower 48 states appearing in the
Alaska Airlines system timetable.

Peninsula Airways filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Alaska
Case No. 17-00282) on Aug. 6, 2017.  The petition was signed by
Daniel P. Seybert, its president.  At the time of filing, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities ranging from $10 million to
$50 million.

The case is assigned to Judge Gary Spraker.  

Cabot C. Christianson, Esq., at the Law Offices of Cabot
Christianson, P.C., is serving as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.
Dawson Law Group, LLC, is the Debtor's special counsel.

The official committee of unsecured creditors formed in the case
retained Erik LeRoy, P.C., as counsel.


PERFUMANIA HOLDINGS: Receives Nasdaq Listing Non-Compliance Notice
------------------------------------------------------------------
Perfumania Holdings, Inc., a U.S. specialty retailer and
distributor of designer fragrances and related beauty products, on
Sept. 21 disclosed that, on September 19, 2017, the Company
received a letter from the staff of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
notifying the Company that it is not in compliance with Listing
Rule 5250(c)(1), having failed to file its Form 10-Q with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") when due in September
2017, and that, in light of the Company's bankruptcy filing, the
staff has determined in accordance with Listing Rules 5101 and
5110(b), and IM-5101-1, that the Company's common stock will be
delisted from The Nasdaq Stock Market ("Nasdaq").

Considering Nasdaq's continued listing requirements and the
Company's intention to emerge from Chapter 11 as a private company,
the Company does not plan to appeal the Nasdaq staff's
determination.  Accordingly, trading of the Company's common stock
on Nasdaq will be suspended as of the opening of business on
September 28, 2017, and Nasdaq will file a Form 25 (Notification of
Removal from Listing) with the SEC, which will remove the Company's
common stock from listing on Nasdaq.

After the Company's common stock is delisted by Nasdaq, it may be
eligible to be quoted on the over-the-counter market.  There is no
assurance that broker-dealers will commence or continue to provide
public quotes of the common stock on this market during the
Company's reorganization or, if so, whether the trading volume of
the common stock will be sufficient to provide for an efficient
trading market.

The Company intends that, following delisting, if its plan of
reorganization is confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court, it will file a
Form 15 (Certification and Notice of Termination of Registration)
with the SEC to deregister its common stock under the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").  The Company's
obligation to file periodic reports such as Forms 10-Q and 10-K
under the Exchange Act will be suspended immediately upon such
filing and will terminate when deregistration becomes effective 90
days thereafter.

                    About Perfumania Holdings

Perfumania Holdings, Inc. (PERF) --
http://www.perfumaniaholdings.com/-- is a specialty retailer and
distributor of fragrances and related beauty products across the
United States.  Perfumania has a 30-year history of innovative
marketing and sales management, brand development, license sourcing
and wholesale distribution making it the premier destination for
fragrances and other beauty supplies.  As of Aug. 26, 2017,
Perfumania, Inc., operated a chain of 226 retail stores,
specializing in the sale of fragrances and related products at
discounted prices up to 75% below the manufacturers' suggested
retail prices.

Perfumania reported a net loss of $23.63 million for the fiscal
year ended Jan. 28, 2017, and a net loss of $11.67 million for the
fiscal year ended Jan. 30, 2016.

As of April 29, 2017, Perfumania had $304.7 million in total
assets, $253.9 million in total liabilities and $50.80 million in
total shareholders' equity.

On Aug. 26, 2017, Model Reorg Acquisition, LLC and 18 affiliated
debtors, including perfumania Holdings, Inc., each filed voluntary
petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware seeking relief under chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code.  The Debtors' cases are jointly administered for
procedural purposes under the case docket for Model Reorg
Acquisition, LLC (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 17-11794).

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is serving as legal
counsel, Ankura Consulting Group, LLC is serving as financial
advisor, and Imperial Capital is serving as investment banker to
the Company.

The Skadden team includes Corporate Restructuring partners Lisa
Laukitis and J. Gregory Milmoe (Boston), and associates Raquelle
Kaye (Boston), Esther Adzhiashvili and AZ Biazar, as well as
Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy Litigation partner Anthony
Clark (Wilmington) and associate Cameron Fee (Wilmington); Banking
partner Sarah Ward and associates Emily Stork, Shan Song (Chicago)
and Katherine Webb; Tax partner Brian Krause and associate Joseph
Soltis; and Corporate partner Richard Grossman (New York).

Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions is the claims and noticing agent and
maintains the Web site http://dm.epiq11.com/perfumania


PETCO HOLDINGS: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative on Soft Performance
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on San Diego-based specialty
pet retailer Petco Holdings Inc. to negative from stable. At the
same time, S&P affirmed all ratings on the company, including the
'B' corporate credit rating.

S&P noted that the outlook revision on Petco reflects greater
competition in the pet retailing space with mass retailers and
other online retailers competing aggressively for pet food market
share, which resulted in weaker sales for the company. S&P said,
"We also view its smaller online market share versus peer
PetSmart/Chewy could put pressure on the rating as customers
continue to shop online for convenience and search for price value.
The company reported weak same-store sales in second quarter 2017
of about negative 2%, and we expect sales comparisons to remain
soft for the next year. Because of these factors, we expect debt to
EBTIDA to rise modestly above 6x over the next year and interest
coverage of around mid-2x."

S&P said, "The negative outlook reflects our expectations that
Petco Holdings' credit metrics will remain weak for the ratings
given the intensely competitive retail environment and soft traffic
trends. We also think downside risk has increased because of the
potential for greater shift in market share to the mass and online
channels. We see some profit margin pressures and leverage above 6x
the next several quarters.

"We could consider a lower rating if competitive pressures from
other players, including online retailers, hurt Petco's sales and
EBITDA, leading us to believe the company's market position is
weakening. If this occurs, we could continue to see continued
negative same-store sales and a decline in profit margins by about
100 basis points (bps) or more, resulting in leverage sustained at
6.5x or greater. Additional downside pressures could come from
sizeable debt-financed dividends to the owners, leading us to
believe that its financial policies are becoming more aggressive."

An outlook revision back to stable will be predicated on Petco's
ability to rebound from soft same-store sales and its ability to
improve its credit profile such that debt to EBITDA declines to the
low- to mid-5x area and free cash flow exceeds $100 million
annually. Such improvement to the company's credit profile could
result from better-than-expected operating performance with EBITDA
margins improving 100 bps because of better same-store sales at
positive levels and costs savings initiatives.


PNEUMA INTERNATIONAL: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------------
Pneuma International, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of California, for authority allowing the Debtor
to use the proceeds of accounts receivable and available cash.

The Debtor intends to use cash collateral to continue operations,
to meet payroll obligations, and to continue to pay Bank of America
and the two secured creditors' regular monthly payments in
accordance with the budget. The proposed monthly Budget reflects
total expenses of $54,228.

The Debtor believes that Bank of America and the Judgment Creditors
Yong Kwon Cho, Central United Packaging, Inc., and Bruch Chalmers
hold security interests in the Debtor's cash collateral.

Accordingly, the Debtor proposes to condition the use of such
receivables and cash by giving Bank of America and the partially
secured Judgment Creditors a replacement lien for a like amount of
post-petition receivables, cash and cash equivalents until such
time as the Debtor's case is confirmed, dismissed or converted.

In addition, the Debtor will make monthly adequate protection
payment in the amount of $3,100 to Bank of America, and the sum of
$1,000/month to be paid to the Judgment Creditors, in pro-rata
distributions (relative to the amount of its secured debt)
commencing on October 1, 2017.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Sept. 6, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/chrhcc

                   About Pneuma International

Pneuma International, Inc., doing business as EGPAK, is a
manufacturer of coated and laminated packaging paper based in
Hayward, California.  EGPAK filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
N.D. Cal. Case No. 17-42149) on Aug. 25, 2017.  The petition was
signed by Mikahel Chang, principal.  The case is assigned to Judge
Roger L. Efremsky.  The Debtor is represented by Nancy Weng, Esq.,
at Tsao-Wu & Yee, LLP.  At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated
$100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.


POINTE PROPERTIES: Wants Approval to Use Monroe Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------------------
Pointe Properties, LLC, seeks authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana to use the
cash collateral which is the subject of the liens in favor of
Monroe Capital LLC and the State of Indiana.

The Debtor has an immediate need to use cash collateral in order to
permit, among other things, the orderly continuation of the
operation of its business, to maintain business relationships with
vendors and suppliers and to satisfy other working capital needs.

The Debtor proposes to adhere to the proposed Budget which provides
total expenses in the aggregate sum of $48,488 per month.

The Debtor asserts that the use of cash collateral is necessary to
prevent the immediate and irreparable harm to Debtor and its estate
that would otherwise result if it is prevented from obtaining use
of cash collateral for the foregoing purposes.

Although there are two parties who could assert an interest in the
Debtor's cash collateral, the Debtor believes only to Monroe
Capital, LLC may have valid, enforceable and non-avoidable,
first-priority lien and security interest in substantially all of
the personal property as well as general intangibles owned by
Debtor including cash collateral. Although the State of Indiana has
a general statutory lien which is fully secured, the Debtor is
unaware of any other parties who may assert a lien on Debtor's cash
collateral.

The Debtor asserts that Monroe Capital is not entitled to further
adequate protection of its interests in Debtor's personal and real
property which is appraised at $1.65 million, including any cash
collateral thereof, for any diminution in value of such property or
cash collateral, including any diminution resulting from the use of
cash collateral and the imposition of the automatic stay.

However, the Debtor believes, in an exercise of its prudent
business judgment, to maintain the status quo, that the adequate
protection given by the proposed granting of replacement liens over
cash collateral to the same extent, validity and priority of Monroe
Capital's prepetition liens and ample coverage of its secured loan
is fair, reasonable and necessary under the circumstances.

Furthermore, the Debtor proposes to provide adequate protection to
State of Indiana by making payment on its post-petition trust fund
liabilities on a weekly basis in the amount of $1550 and to pay an
additional $750 per week as adequate protection for its statutory
lien.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Sept. 7, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/yxt0Jf

                    About Pointe Properties

Pointe Properties LLC -- http://www.eaglepointe.com/-- owns a
short-term condo rentals business at 2250 East Pointe Rd,
Bloomington, IN.  The Condominium has an 18-hole professional golf
course, full service restaurant and bar.  It also offers
event/wedding planning, company retreats, pool and cabana bar and
weekly music on the terrace.

Pointe Properties sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case No. 17-06729) on Sept. 5,
2017.  The petition was signed by Douglas R. Thomas, manager.
Judge Jeffrey J. Graham presides over the case.  The Debtor is
represented by Steven P. Taylor, Esq., at the Law Office of Steven
P. Taylor, P.C.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.


PORTER BANCORP: Cancels Registration of Unsold Securities
---------------------------------------------------------
Porter Bancorp, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission post-effective amendments to the following registration
statements to remove from registration any and all of the
Registrant's Common Shares, no par value, that remain unsold at the
termination of the offerings: (a) Registration No. 333-170678; (b)
Registration No. 333-168424; and (c) Registration No. 333-212207.

The Post-Effective Amendment removed from registration the
Company's 680,000 Common Shares, no par value, registered pursuant
to this Registration No. 333-212207 that remain unsold at the
termination of the offering.

                  About Porter Bancorp, Inc.

Porter Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: PBIB) -- http://www.pbibank.com-- is
a Louisville, Kentucky-based bank holding company which operates
banking centers in 12 counties through its wholly-owned subsidiary
PBI Bank.  The Company's markets include metropolitan Louisville in
Jefferson County and the surrounding counties of Henry and Bullitt,
and extend south along the Interstate 65 corridor.  The Company
serves southern and south central Kentucky from banking centers in
Butler, Green, Hart, Edmonson, Barren, Warren, Ohio and Daviess
counties.  The Company also has a banking center in Lexington,
Kentucky, the second largest city in the state.  PBI Bank is a
traditional community bank with a wide range of personal and
business banking products and services.

Porter Bancorp reported a net loss of $2.75 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2016, a net loss of $3.21 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2015, and a net loss of $11.15 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2014.  As of June 30, 2017, Porter Bancorp had $954.5
million in total assets, $916.1 million in total liabilities, and
$38.39 million in total stockholders' equity.

The Company said in its 2016 Annual Report that, "Regulatory
restrictions have limited our ability to pay interest on the junior
subordinated debentures that underlie our trust preferred
securities.  If we cannot pay accrued and unpaid interest on these
securities for more than twenty consecutive quarters, we will be in
default."

"At December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate obligation of $21.4
million relating to the principal and accrued unpaid interest on
our four issues of junior subordinated debentures, which has
resulted in a deferral of distributions on our trust preferred
securities.  Although we are permitted to defer payments on these
securities for up to five years (and we commenced doing so in
2016), the deferred interest payments continue to accrue until
paid in full.  Our deferral period expires after the second quarter
of 2021."

"Our holding company debt could make it difficult to recapitalize
or enter into a business combination transaction because any
investor or purchaser would effectively assume the outstanding
liability on the debt in addition to the amount of funds such
investors or purchaser would need to provide in order to
recapitalize the Bank and the Company."


QUADRANT 4: Has Final Nod to Access $900K of DIP Financing
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jack B. Schmetterer of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois has signed a Final Order authorizing
Quadrant 4 Systems Corporation to obtain secured postpetition
financing up to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$900,000 from BMO Harris Bank, N.A., which post-petition financing
will bear interest at the base rate plus 5.5%.

Additionally, upon the written approval of BMO Harris Bank, BIP
Lender, LLC, the Committee, and the Office of the U.S. Trustee, the
Debtor may obtain additional post-petition financing up to
$2,000,000 and seek other financial accommodations from BMO Harris
Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Final Order.

The Debtor is also authorized to use the proceeds of any loans made
under the post-petition financing, to use cash collateral and other
collateral as provided and limited in the Budget for the expenses
incurred in the operations of the Debtor's business and the
administration of this Chapter 11 Case. The Budget provides total
projected cash disbursements of $2,087,197 for week ending
September 1 through week ending September 22, 2017.

Any subsequent Budget will go into effect upon the approval of the
Debtor, BMO Harris Bank, BIP Lender, the Committee, and the U.S.
Trustee. In the event that BMO Harris Bank has not been paid off in
full by October 31, 2017, BMO Harris Bank, the Committee and the
Debtor will make reasonable efforts to agree on a budget under the
circumstances present at such time.

Subject to the carve-out, the post-petition indebtedness will
constitute superpriority claims with priority in payment over any
and all administrative expenses of any kind pursuant to the
Bankruptcy Code.

As security for the postpetition indebtedness, BMO Harris Bank is
granted valid and perfected senior security interests in and liens
on all assets of the Debtor, a 100% pledge of any of the Debtor's
capital stock in which the Debtor has an interest and the stock of
all of the Debtor's subsidiaries, causes of action, 25% of the net
proceeds from any avoidance actions, investment property, leases
and all substitutions thereto, accessions, rents and proceeds of
the foregoing.

The Debtor acknowledges its indebtedness to BMO Harris Bank
pursuant to several prepetition agreements, loans, advances and
other credit accommodations in the aggregate outstanding principal
amount of approximately $19,447,315. The Debtor also acknowledges
as security for repayment of the prepetition loan indebtedness, the
Debtor granted BMO Harris Bank security interests in, and liens
upon substantially all of the Debtor's assets, including the
post-petition proceeds and products thereof.

In addition, the Debtor acknowledges that pursuant to the
Intercreditor Agreement, among other things: (a) BMO Harris Bank's
right to the security interests in and liens upon the prepetition
collateral are senior and prior in right to the security interests
and liens of BIP Lender, LLC in and upon the prepetition
collateral, and (b) the payment of any Second Lien Obligations are
subordinate and subject in right and time of payment to all First
Lien Obligations.

BMO Harris Bank and BIP Lender are granted adequate protection for
any diminution in the value of the collateral, resulting from: (i)
the liens and security interests granted by the Post-Petition
Financing and the Final Order; (ii) the Debtor's use of cash
collateral; (iii) the use, sale or lease of the collateral (other
than the cash collateral), and (iv) the imposition of the automatic
stay, as follows:

     (a) BMO Harris Bank is granted with valid and perfected,
replacement security interests in and liens on all of the Debtor's
right, title and interest in the collateral, subject only to the
carve-out, the liens granted to BMO Harris Bank pursuant to the
Final Order and Pre-Petition Agreements to secure the Post-Petition
Indebtedness, and any prior permitted liens;

     (b) BMO Harris Bank is also granted super-priority claims,
junior only to the super-priority claims granted to BMO Harris Bank
pursuant to the Final Order in respect of the Post-Petition
Financing and the carve-out; and

     (c) BIP Lender is granted with a valid and perfected,
replacement security interests in and liens on all of the Debtor's
right, title and interest in the collateral, subject only to the
carve-out, the liens granted to BMO Harris Bank pursuant to the
Final Order and the Pre-Petition Agreements to secure the
Post-Petition Indebtedness and Pre-Petition Loan Indebtedness and
any prior permitted liens.

The carve-out consists of:

     (a) quarterly fees required to paid to the U.S. Trustee;

     (b) the aggregate allowed unpaid fees and expenses to each
professional person retained by the Debtor and the Committee;

     (c) all other fees and expenses set forth in the Budget in an
amount not to exceed the unpaid amounts budgeted in any approved
Budget on an accrual basis.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated Sept. 7, 2017, is available at
https://is.gd/NrMLz9

                    About Quadrant 4 System

Quadrant 4 System Corporation (OTC:QFOR) -- http://www.qfor.com/--
sells IT products and services.  Its revenues are primarily
generated from the placement of staffing or solution consultants,
and the sale and licensing of its proprietary cloud-based Software
as a Service (SaaS) systems, as well as a wide range of technology
oriented services and solutions.  Quadrant's principal executive
offices are located in Schaumburg Illinois.  The Company also
operates its business from various offices located in Naples,
Florida; Alpharetta, Georgia; Bingham Farms, Michigan; Cranbury,
New Jersey; Pleasanton, California; and Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Quadrant 4 System is the 100% owner of the issued and outstanding
common stock of Stratitude, Inc., a California corporation, which
it acquired on or about Nov. 3, 2016. Concurrently with the
Stratitude Acquisition, Stratitude acquired certain of the assets
of Agama Solutions, Inc., a California corporation.  Both
Stratitude and Agama are located in Pleasanton and Fremont,
California and are engaged in the IT business.

Quadrant 4 System disclosed total assets of $47.05 million and
total liabilities of $31.39 million as of Sept. 30, 2016.

Quadrant 4 System filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill.
Case No. 17-19689) on June 29, 2017.  CEO Robert H. Steele signed
the petition.

Quadrant 4, which was subject to a securities fraud probe that led
to the arrest and resignation of its top two executives seven
months ago, sought Chapter 11 protection after reaching a
settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and
signing deals to sell four business segments for at least $6.9
million.

The Chapter 11 case is assigned to Judge Jack B. Schmetterer.

The Debtor's bankruptcy attorneys are Adelman & Gettleman, Ltd.'s
Chad H. Gettleman, Esq. and Nathan Q. Rugg, Esq.  Nixon Peabody LLP
acts as special counsel for matters concerning taxes, labor, ERISA,
securities compliance, international law, and related matters while
Faegre Baker Daniels LLP acts as special counsel for securities
litigation.  Silverman Consulting Inc., serve as financial
consultants to the Debtor, and Livingstone Partners, LLC, as
investment banker.

On July 10, 2017, a three-member panel was appointed as official
committee of unsecured creditors in the Debtor's case.  Sugar
Felsenthal Grais & Hammer LLP serve as counsel to the Committee and
Amherst Partners, LLC as financial advisor.


QUADRANT 4: Seeks OK of Key Employee Incentive Plan
---------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Quadrant 4 Systems filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court a motion for an order authorizing the
Debtor's key employee incentive program (KEIP). The motion
explains, "For a variety of reasons, including the limited
availability of resources and the concentrated sale efforts focused
on other Business Units, the Debtor was not simply not able to sell
the Remaining Assets on the same accelerated timeframe as the other
Business Units.  The Debtor nonetheless seeks to realize a going
concern sale for the Remaining Assets and requires Mr. Steele's
expertise and knowledge of the assets and the unique factors
involved in the Chapter 11 Case to obtain stalking horse bidders
for such assets, maintain the underlying business operations,
oversee an auction process, and ultimately close such sales.  Mr.
Steele's background in the healthcare IT industry, his history with
the Debtor in entering that industry, and his tireless efforts to
assist the Debtor and its professionals in consummating sales of
the five Business Units during the Chapter 11 Case to date, make
him uniquely qualified to shepherd the Debtor through the next
phase of the Chapter 11 Case -- the marketing and sale of the
Remaining Assets.  Obtaining stalking horse bids and closing sales
of these assets is by no means guaranteed, especially in light of
the nature of the assets and that the consent of both secured
lenders is required due to the significant secured debt that is
outstanding. Mr. Steele shall be entitled to a payment in the
amount of one and one half percent (1.5%) of the purchase price of
any assets which are the subject of a Sale Transaction."

The Court scheduled a September 28, 2017 hearing on the motion,
according to the report.

                    About Quadrant 4 System

Quadrant 4 System Corporation (OTC:QFOR) -- http://www.qfor.com/--
sells IT products and services.  Its revenues are primarily
generated from the placement of staffing or solution consultants,
and the sale and licensing of its proprietary cloud-based Software
as a Service (SaaS) systems, as well as a wide range of technology
oriented services and solutions.  Quadrant's principal executive
offices are located in Schaumburg Illinois.  The Company also
operates its business from various offices located in Naples,
Florida; Alpharetta, Georgia; Bingham Farms, Michigan; Cranbury,
New Jersey; Pleasanton, California; and Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Quadrant 4 System is the 100% owner of the issued and outstanding
common stock of Stratitude, Inc., a California corporation, which
it acquired on or about Nov. 3, 2016.  Concurrently with the
Stratitude Acquisition, Stratitude acquired certain of the assets
of Agama Solutions, Inc., a California corporation.  Both
Stratitude and Agama are located in Pleasanton and Fremont,
California and are engaged in the IT business.

Quadrant 4 System disclosed total assets of $47.05 million and
total liabilities of $31.39 million as of Sept. 30, 2016.

Quadrant 4 System filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill.
Case No. 17-19689) on June 29, 2017.   CEO Robert H. Steele signed
the petition.

Quadrant 4, which was subject to a securities fraud probe that led
to the arrest and resignation of its top two executives seven
months ago, sought Chapter 11 protection after reaching a
settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and
signing deals to sell four business segments for at least $6.9
million.

The Chapter 11 case is assigned to Judge Jack B. Schmetterer.

The Debtor's bankruptcy attorneys are Adelman & Gettleman, Ltd.'s
Chad H. Gettleman, Esq. and Nathan Q. Rugg, Esq.  Nixon Peabody LLP
acts as special counsel for matters concerning taxes, labor, ERISA,
securities compliance, international law, and related matters while
Faegre Baker Daniels LLP acts as special counsel for securities
litigation.  Silverman Consulting Inc., serve as financial
consultants to the Debtor, and Livingstone Partners, LLC, as
investment banker.

On July 10, 2017, a three-member panel was appointed as official
committee of unsecured creditors in the Debtor's case.  Sugar
Felsenthal Grais & Hammer LLP serve as counsel to the Committee and
Amherst Partners, LLC as financial advisor.


RDL LLC: Santanas Buying Little Falls Property for $850K
--------------------------------------------------------
RDL, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New
Jersey to authorize the sale of real property located in Lot 89,
Block 5.02 in the Township of Little Falls, New Jersey, and
commonly known as 151 Paterson Avenue, Little Falls, New Jersey to
Germaniso and Zobeida Santana, or a new entity to be formed by
them, for $850,000, subject to higher or better offers.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Oct. 17, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.
Objections, if any, must be filed no later than seven days prior to
the return date.

The Debtor owns the Property which is a commercial building
containing approximately 6,400 square feet of rentable space, which
is currently vacant.  

There are outstanding real estate taxes due with regard to the
Property.  In addition, Noah Bank holds a first mortgage lien
against the Property.  In accordance with a final judgment of
foreclosure entered in favor of Noah Bank, a foreclosure sale of
the Property was scheduled for the Petition Date.  The foreclosure
sale was automatically stayed upon the filing of Debtor's chapter
11 proceeding.

The Debtor had attempted to sell the Property prior to the Petition
Date.  In furtherance thereof, it entered into a Listing Agreement
with Evergreen Commercial Real Estate, Inc. on April 28, 2017
listing the property for sale at $995,000.  The Court authorized
the Debtor's retention of Evergreen.

Evergreen continued to actively market the Property for sale.  In
addition to the offer received from the Santanas, Evergreen
obtained two other letters of intent which were unable to be
finalized into binding agreements.  The Santanas have provided the
Debtor's broker with proof of funds to pay the balance due under
the Santana Contract net of the mortgage and has represented in the
Santana Contract that they have the financial wherewithal to
consummate the transaction.  

The proposed sale will be without representations and warranties
and free and clear of liens, claims, interests and encumbrances of
any kind or nature, with all such interests to attach to the
proceeds of sale.  All liens against the Property will attach to
the net cash proceeds of the sale of the Property after costs of
sale.  The deposit is in the amount of $42,500 due upon execution
of the Agreement.  The closing of the sale is the date that is 10
days following the Due Diligence Period.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/RDL_LLC_14_Sales.pdf

The Property is currently vacant and the Debtor has no means by
which to restructure the mortgage obligation and satisfy the claims
of creditors other than through a sale of the Property.  The sale
will produce proceeds that will allow the Debtor to pay in full the
allowed amounts of the secured mortgage claim of Noah Bank and the
secured claim of the Township of Little Falls for real estate
taxes.  There are no other liens against the Property.

The proceeds remaining after the payment of liens and
administration expenses will then be available for distribution to
creditors and equity interest holders according to the priority
provisions set forth in the Bankruptcy Code.

Delaying the sale of the Property will simply result in the
increase of administration expenses and the erosion of a
distribution available from the sale.  Therefore, in the exercise
of its business judgment, the Debtor has determined that a sale of
the Property is appropriate and in the best interests of its estate
and creditors.  Accordingly, the Debtor asks the Court to approve
the relief sought.

The Purchaser:

          Germaniso and Zobeida Santana
          12 Seeley Avenue
          Kearny, NJ 07032

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Jose B. Moreira, Esq.
          MOREIRA & MOREIRA, PC
          712 Kearny Avenue
          Kearny, NJ 07032

                        About RDL, LLC

RDL, LLC, filed a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
D.N.J. Case No. 17-25573) on Aug. 1, 2017.  The Hon. Stacey L.
Meisel oversees the case.  John P. Di Iorio, Esq., at Shapiro
Croland Reiser Apfel & Di Iorio, LLP, serves as Chapter 11 counsel.
Evergreen Commercial Real Estate, Inc., has been hired as the
Debtor's realtor.


RESOLUTE ENERGY: Posts $13.2 Million Net Income in Second Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Resolute Energy Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting net income
of $13.22 million on $71.02 million of total revenue for the three
months ended June 30, 2017, compared to a net loss of $36.90
million on $35.39 million of total revenue for the same period
during the prior year.

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, Resolute Energy reported
net income of $14.70 million on $136.25 million of total revenue
compared to a net loss of $122.21 million on $54.39 million of
total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

As of June 30, 2017, Resolute Energy had $728.54 million in total
assets, $790.78 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $62.23 million.

Rick Betz, Resolute's chief executive officer, said: "Resolute has
continued to ramp up production, driven by our successful drilling
in the Delaware Basin.  Second quarter production averaged 24,355
barrels of oil equivalent ("Boe") per day (63% oil and 78%
liquids), an increase of 12,490 Boe per day, or 105 percent, from
the prior year second quarter.  On a sequential basis, second
quarter production increased by 4,653 Boe per day, or 24 percent
compared to first quarter volumes of 19,702 Boe per day.
Sequential production from our Permian Basin operations increased
by 33 percent, from 13,798 Boe per day in the first quarter to
18,383 Boe per day in the second quarter and increased 227 percent
from the prior year second quarter.  These second quarter volumes
include approximately 630 Boe per day from our newly acquired
Bronco acreage.  

"Our production growth continued to accelerate through the end of
the second quarter and into the third quarter, with estimated July
production of approximately 29,500 Boe per day.  Our Permian Basin
production increased to 23,600 Boe per day during the month with
the Bronco area contributing approximately 3,400 Boe per day.  For
the second quarter Aneth production was approximately 6,000 Boe per
day, and once again essentially flat to the first quarter and the
prior year despite continued restraint in capital spending.

"Net income for the second quarter was $13.2 million up from $1.5
million in the first quarter.  Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP measure)
increased twelve percent to $32.4 million compared to $28.9 million
in the first quarter.  This increase in Adjusted EBITDA was
achieved not just by increased production but also by continued
improvement in lease operating expenses ("LOE") more than
offsetting weakness in commodity prices.  For the quarter, we saw
LOE in our Delaware Basin operations decline to $4.87 per Boe
produced from $5.42 per Boe in the first quarter.  Cash general and
administrative expenses (a non-GAAP measure) for the quarter also
showed significant improvement, declining from $4.28 per Boe in the
first quarter to $2.95 per Boe in the second quarter.  

"During the second quarter we spud seven wells and completed ten
wells.  We completed four mid-length laterals in Mustang with 24
hour peak IP rates averaging 2,584 Boe per day, two long laterals
in Appaloosa with average initial 24 hour peak IP rates of 3,657
Boe per day and four drilled but uncompleted ("DUCs") wells
acquired in the Bronco transaction.  At quarter-end we had four
wells waiting on completion and three wells in various stages of
drilling.  Also during the quarter, we continued to de-risk our
drilling inventory by completing two Wolfcamp B wells, one a
mid-length lateral in central Mustang and one a mid-length lateral
in Bronco.  We are continuing to study early-time production from
these wells.  As expected they look much stronger than earlier
generation B wells.

"Year to date, we have reached total depth on sixteen wells.  These
include nine mid-length laterals and seven long laterals.  We have
completed and brought on line eighteen wells since January,
including eleven mid-length laterals, four long laterals and three
standard length laterals.  Based on our current drilling schedule,
we expect to spud the last well in our originally announced 22 well
drilling plan early in the fourth quarter.  While we do not believe
it would be prudent at this time to add a third rig to our program,
our advanced drilling pace does give us the opportunity to expand
the program with our existing rigs.  Were we to keep both rigs
running through year end it would result in up to five additional
spuds in 2017.  We will be evaluating this option over the coming
months.

"Putting more focus on activities in Bronco, we closed the
acquisition in May and immediately commenced completion operations
on the six operated DUCs included in the transaction.  To date we
have completed five of the wells including three Wolfcamp A wells
and two Wolfcamp B wells.  Two of the wells were mid-length
laterals that were completed with 32 frac stages and had initial
production in the first week of June.  The 24 hour peak IP rates on
these two wells were 3,013 and 2,764 Boe per day, with currently
calculated 30-day rates of 2,541 and 2,402 Boe per day,
respectively.  These rates compare favorably with our Mustang and
Appaloosa results.  The remaining four wells were standard length
laterals.  Two of the wells were completed with 19 frac stages and
came on line at the end of June.  We are encouraged by the 24 hour
peak IP rates from these wells, averaging 2,300 Boe per day.  Of
the last two wells, one well has been completed and is flowing back
and the second well is waiting on completion.  We expect the
seventh DUC acquired, an outside-operated well, to be completed in
September.

"In addition to the drilling and completion activity, we made
important progress on our field infrastructure.  In June we began
shifting the gathering of our oil production from trucks into an
oil pipeline constructed by our mid-stream partner.  By the end of
July, substantially all Mustang and Appaloosa oil volumes were
being gathered by pipeline.  This greatly simplifies the marketing
of our production, it reduces our effective transportation costs,
it entails less traffic impact on our in-field roads and other
infrastructure, and it is expected to be more environmentally
friendly than trucking the product to market.  At this time, Bronco
oil volumes continue to be gathered by truck, but we expect to move
those volumes to pipe later this year.  Also in Bronco we completed
the build out of production facilities which will support the
long-term development of this asset.  

"During the second quarter we did experience a limited number of
instances of well interference, primarily in Appaloosa, as we
completed infill wells in close proximity to older producing wells
in the same horizon.  We did not observe this same impact when
drilling well pairs in Mustang.  We estimate these events reduced
company production for the quarter by approximately 1,000 to 1,200
Boe per day, or approximately four to five percent.  These types of
events are not atypical for development in the Permian Basin and
have been reported by other operators as well.

"We have made operational adjustments based on our own observations
and our review of recent industry best practices, which we believe
will reduce these impacts in the future.  First, we anticipate that
our future drilling will be done in groups of two to four wells
followed by sequential frac operations on all of the wells in the
group.  We made this change starting with our two Ranger long
laterals in Appaloosa in June.  These wells are currently waiting
on completion.  That rig has moved and is currently drilling the
first of two long lateral South Elephant wells which will be
drilled together and then completed sequentially.  Importantly, the
initial well on this pad is our first Wolfcamp C well.  This well
will help de-risk our Delaware Basin drilling inventory, satisfy
depth clauses on certain leases and give us valuable data as we
design future pad drilling operations.  We expect these wells will
be completed starting in October.  In Mustang we have one well to
finish drilling before we shift to two well pads through the
remainder of the year.  We believe this shift to pad drilling will
result in savings of between $0.5 and $1.0 million dollars per
pad.

"Second, we have moved to increase the density of perf clusters in
our frac design.  We do not expect this to change our overall
proppant loading or completion costs.  The goal of this revised
design is to give us a more effective completion in the near
wellbore environment while reducing the instances where individual
fractures reach out long distances and negatively affect adjacent
wells.  

"The shift to pad drilling is expected to modestly impact
production growth in the second half of the year as a small number
of completions are delayed.  Including our Bronco completion
program, we remain comfortable with our previously announced
guidance of 24,000 to 28,000 Boe per day, prior to any adjustment
that may be required as a result of closing on the proposed Aneth
divestiture.  At the mid-point this would represent an increase of
more than 83 percent over 2016 production levels.  Additionally, we
have experienced a modest shift in our oil percentage resulting
from our mix of producing wells.  Looking at our legacy assets we
remain comfortable with our percentage oil guidance.  However, as
we bring additional Bronco wells on line we have observed gas to
oil ratios consistent with Mustang, which has increased our blended
gas to oil ratio marginally.  Including anticipated production from
Bronco, the Company's percentage oil may decline by one to two
percent.  From a capital expenditure standpoint, when we include
approximately $37 million in net capital allocated to Bronco and
approximately $15 million in increased capital associated with
increased working interests in certain second quarter wells and
unbudgeted outside-operated wells, we are increasing our capital
guidance range to $270 million to $285 million.  

"As you know, we are actively pursuing the disposition of our Aneth
Field assets.  We recently completed a thorough marketing process
that resulted in multiple acceptable bids.  We are currently in
negotiations on definitive documentation with our preferred
counterparty.  We expect to announce a signing of such documents
during the third quarter with the objective of closing the
transaction in the fourth quarter. Upon a closing we anticipate
reissuing production and cost guidance.  In the meantime, recall
that we solidified our liquidity position with a $125 million
add-on to our existing Senior Note due 2020, insuring that we were
well positioned to close the Bronco acquisition as well as execute
the drilling program.

"Finally, as we announced on August 2, Resolute's Board of
Directors has added two new members, Janet Pasque and Tod Benton.
Ms. Pasque and Mr. Benton bring a wealth of relevant experience to
our board, an unwavering commitment to excellence and integrity,
and a thoughtful approach to the industry and the Company.  As a
result, the board now consists of nine members, six of whom are
independent.  We welcome Janet and Tod, and are excited about their
future contribution to the success of Resolute."

Resolute recorded net income available to common shareholders of
$10.7 million, or $0.47 per diluted share, on revenue of $71.0
million during the three months ended June 30, 2017.  Included in
net income was $7.5 million of commodity derivative gains.  This
compares to a net loss of $36.9 million, or $2.44 per share, on
revenue of $35.4 million during the three months ended June 30,
2016.  The 2016 loss included commodity derivative losses of $19.6
million.

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, Resolute recorded net
income available to common shareholders of $10.8 million, or $0.47
per diluted share, on revenue of $136.3 million.  Included in net
income was $18.3 million of commodity derivative gains.  This
compares to a net loss of $122.2 million or $8.10 per share, on
revenue of $54.4 million.  The 2016 loss included commodity
derivative losses of $15.7 million and a non-cash impairment charge
of $58 million.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/vbp7hw

                      About Resolute Energy

Resolute Energy Corp. -- http://www.resoluteenergy.com/-- is an
independent oil and gas company focused on the acquisition and
development of unconventional oil and gas properties in the
Delaware Basin portion of the Permian Basin of west Texas. Resolute
also operates Aneth Field, located in the Paradox Basin in Utah.
The Company routinely posts important information about the Company
under the Investor Relations section of its website. The Company's
common stock is traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol "REN."

Resolute reported a net loss of $161.7 million in 2016, a net loss
of $742.27 million in 2015 and a net loss of $21.85 million in
2014.  

                          *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on Feb. 27, 2017, Moody's Investors Service
upgraded Resolute Energy Corporation's Corporate Family Rating
(CFR) to 'B3' from 'Caa2', the Probability of Default Rating to
'B3-PD' from 'Caa2-PD' and its senior unsecured notes rating to
'Caa1' from 'Caa3'.  The Speculative Grade Liquidity rating was
affirmed at SGL-3.  The rating outlook was changed to stable.

"The upgrade to B3 reflects Resolute's improved capital structure,
continued strong drilling results and improved production and
drilling economics, which provide good visibility to continued
growth in a mid $40s oil price environment without increasing debt
leverage," noted John Thieroff, Moody's VP-Senior Analyst.  "We
expect moderation in the company's reserve- and production-based
debt metrics from significant production growth at very competitive
drillbit costs."

The TCR reported on May 15, 2017, that S&P Global Ratings assigned
its 'B-' corporate credit rating to Resolute Energy Corp. (REN).
The rating outlook is stable.  "The corporate credit rating
reflects our assessment of REN's business risk profile as
vulnerable, its financial risk profile as aggressive, and its
liquidity as less than adequate," said S&P Global Ratings credit
analyst, David Lagasse.


REVOLUTION ALUMINUM: Acadiana Railway Objects to Plan Outline
-------------------------------------------------------------
Secured creditor Acadiana Railway Company, Inc., filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana an
objection to Revolution Aluminum Propco, LLC's disclosure statement
referring to the Debtor's plan of reorganization.

Acadiana is in the business of short-line, freight rail services
and construction and maintenance of rail services.  Acadiana
provided such services to Debtor pre-petition.  Acadiana holds a
statutorily perfected lien and privilege upon all of the "road
beds, tracks, rights of way, and franchises of the railroad for the
amount due for the supplies, materials, or labor."  Acadiana
continued to incur costs and expenses and after the order for
relief was entered by the Court.  Acadiana filed its Proof of Claim
numbered 14 in the amount of $1,360,678.83.

Acadiana complains that:

     a. the Disclosure Statement incorrectly classifies Acadiana
        as a Class 3 creditor subordinate to Cervenka & Lukes and
        subordinate to Carr's Dirt Works;

     b. the parties are involved in two adversary proceedings to
        rank liens and the Disclosure Statement fails to provide
        any discussion regarding the lien ranking issues and
        provides no information regarding the method by which the
        Debtor has determined the ranking of the creditors;

     c. the Court authorized the employment of a real estate
        broker and manager of the Debtor by order dated April 27,
        2017.  The Disclosure Statement references the appointment

        and the order at page 14 but fails to provide any
        marketing plan, any proposed sales price and further fails

        to provide any discussion or information regarding
        potential return to creditors upon the sale of the
        property;

     d. the Disclosure Statement was last amended on May 15, 2017,

        and has not been supplemented regarding any marketing
        information.  Counsel for Debtor has informed counsel for
        Acadiana that the Debtor is awaiting completion of an
        appraisal of the property; however, almost five months
        have passed since the appointment of the marketer and no
        appraisal or sales price has been provided to creditors;

     e. the Disclosure Statement at page 13, paragraph A again
        references the liens in regard to the valuation of the
        Debtor and omits any discussion of the first ranking
        statutory superior lien of Acadiana;

     f. the Disclosure Statement at page 17, paragraph E discusses

        claims against others and references avoidance actions
        against Bayou Engineering for the annulment of a lease
        however Acadiana understands that Bayou Engineering
        continues to occupy the premises and does not pay rent.
        The Disclosure Statement offers no additional information;

     g. the Debtor has filed a motion to lease the property to the

        management company of the Debtor.  The Disclosure
        Statement further references leases at page 19 and
        indicates that all leases will be rejected unless
        specifically accepted.  The status of the Bayou
        Engineering lease is not clear;

     h. although the plan proposed is a liquidating plan, the
        Liquidation Analysis provided in the Disclosure
        Statement starting at page 24 states that "as the value of

        the property is speculative and unknown at this time, the
        Debtor believes that a Chapter 7 liquidation would result
        in more fees and commissions being paid and less money
        would be available for distribution to general unsecured
        claimants than would be available in a Chapter 11 case";

     i. Local Rule 3016-2(2, 3 and 4) states that a Disclosure
        Statement should include complete financial statements and

        forecasts as well as a description of all assets and a
        valuation of same.  The Disclosure Statement, as Amended,
        fails to provide this information;

     j. it is impossible to determine how the Chapter 11 Debtor,
        with no marketing plan, no appraisal and no business
        operations, could conceivably create more value out of the

        property, at this time, than a Chapter 7 Trustee could by
        selling and marketing the property at auction;

     k. the Disclosure Statement fails to address potential
        litigation related to the Debtor.  On Sept. 5, 2017,
        counsel for Revolution Aluminum, LLC, the parent company
        of the Debtor, caused notice of a potential lawsuit to be
        transmitted to multiple parties and persons which notice
        stated in part that "there is a pending bankruptcy
        proceeding involving Revolution Aluminum Propco, LLC under

        number 16-81024" and further stating that "the claims
        arise from activity surrounding that proceeding, as well
        as other activities related to the business of Revolution
        Aluminum, LLC."  Neither the bankruptcy record nor the
        Disclosure Statement contain any information regarding
        potential claims arising out of activities surrounding
        the bankruptcy proceeding;

     l. the Court previously entered an order authorizing
        sanctions against several parties including the
        representative of the Debtor, Roger Boggs.  There is also
        pending on the docket of the Court a motion to appoint
        trustee which is set for hearing on Sept. 20;

     m. the Disclosure Statement fails to address the management
        issues and actions of Roger Boggs related to the
        management of the Debtor in the Disclosure Statement and
        fails to provide any information; and

     n. the counsel for Acadiana was advised that Whitney Bank had

        resigned as Trustee of the Solid Waste Standby Trust for
        the Debtor for the failure of the Debtor to pay the fee.
        The LDEQ website is not complete but appears to contain
        limited information indicating that the Debtor is not in
        compliance.  The Disclosure Statement fails to address any

        of these issues or any environmental issues.  Further, the

        Disclosure Statement fails to address any exposure or
        potential environmental liability arising out of the
        cancellation of the trust agreement.  The provisions of 11

        U.S.C. 1125 do not require or place the burden of proof
        upon creditors and parties in interest to research and
        ferret out information which should be willingly and fully
        disclosed by the Debtor.

A copy of the Objection is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/lawb16-81024-344.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on May 23, 2017, the
Debtor filed with the Court a first amended disclosure statement
for the Debtor's first amended plan of liquidation dated May 15,
2017.  Under the plan, holders of Class 4 Allowed Unsecured Claims
would receive a pro rata distribution, up to the allowed amount of
each Class 4 Claim, from the proceeds of the sale after the
Unclassified Claims and Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 Claims have
been paid in full.

Acadiana Railway is represented by:

     Stephen D. Wheelis, Esq.
     Richard A. Rozanski, Esq.
     WHEELIS & ROZANSKI
     P.O. Box 13199
     Alexandria, Louisiana 71315-3199
     Tel: (318) 445-5600

                 About Revolution Aluminum Propco

Revolution Aluminum Propco, LLC, is a Louisiana company established
in 2015.  It owns a real property comprised of approximately 1,400
acres in Pineville, Louisiana.  The property, which is the
Company's sole asset, is an industrial park and the former site of
a paper mill.

Revolution Aluminum Propco is 100% owned by its parent company,
Revolution Aluminum LLC, and is managed by Roger Boggs.

Ryan & Associates, Inc., Engineered Products, Inc., and Tina J.
Hertzel filed an involuntary Chapter 11 case (Bankr. W.D. La., Case
No. 16-81024) against Revolution Aluminum Propco on Sept. 15, 2016.
The Court entered an order officially placing the Debtor in
bankruptcy on Feb. 1, 2017.

The petitioning creditors are represented by Bradley L. Drell,
Esq., at Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell.  

Steffes, Vingiello & McKenzie, LLC, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor hired Beau Box Real Estate as real
estate broker and manager.

On March 16, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee hired
Gold Weems Bruser Sues & Rundell, APLC, as counsel.

No trustee or examiner has been appointed.


REVOLUTION ALUMINUM: Cleco Power Says Plan Disclosures Insufficient
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Cleco Power, LLC, the electrical utility provider of Revolution
Aluminum Propco, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Louisiana an objection to the Debtor's
disclosure statement.

Cleco Power claims that the Disclosure Statement is inadequate in
providing information.

Cleco Power complains that:

     a. the Disclosure Statement at page 17, paragraph E discusses

        claims against others and references avoidance actions
        against Bayou Engineering for the annulment of a lease
        however CLECO POWER understands that Bayou Engineering
        continues to occupy the premises and does not pay rent.  
        The Disclosure Statement offers no additional information;

     b. the Debtor has filed a motion to lease the property to the

        management company of the Debtor.  The Disclosure
        Statement further references leases at page 19 and
        indicates that all leases will be rejected unless
        specifically accepted.  The status of the Bayou
        Engineering lease is not clear;

     c. although the plan proposed is a liquidating plan, the
        Liquidation Analysis provided in the Disclosure Statement
        starting at page 24 states that "as the value of the
        property is speculative and unknown at this time, the
        Debtor believes that a Chapter 7 liquidation would result
        in more fees and commissions being paid and less money
        would be available for distribution to general unsecured
        claimants than would be available in a Chapter 11 case";

     d. Local Rule 3016-2(2, 3 and 4) states that a Disclosure
        Statement should include complete financial statements and

        forecasts as well as a description of all assets and a
        valuation of same.  The Disclosure Statement, as Amended,
        fails to provide this information;

     e. it is impossible to determine how the Chapter 11 Debtor,
        with no marketing plan, no appraisal and no business
        operations, could conceivably create more value out of the

        property, at this time, than a Chapter 7 Trustee could by
        selling and marketing the property at auction;

     f. the Disclosure Statement fails to address potential
        litigation related to the Debtor.  On Sept. 5, 2017,
        counsel for Revolution Aluminum, LLC, the parent company
        of the Debtor, caused notice of a potential lawsuit to be
        transmitted to multiple parties and persons including
        CLECO POWER and 8 of its employees which notice stated in
        part that "there is a pending bankruptcy proceeding
        involving Revolution Aluminum Propco, LLC under number 16-
        81024" and further stating that "the claims arise from
        activity surrounding that proceeding, as well as other
        activities related to the business of Revolution Aluminum,
        LLC."  Neither the bankruptcy record nor the Disclosure
        Statement contain any information regarding potential
        claims arising out of activities surrounding the
        bankruptcy proceeding;

     g. the Disclosure Statement fails to address the management
        issues and actions of Roger Boggs related to the
        management of the Debtor in the Disclosure Statement and
        fails to provide any information regarding same.  The
        management has repeatedly failed to timely provide for
        payment of utility services, pre- and post-petition; and

     h. counsel for Cleco Power was advised that Whitney Bank had
        resigned as Trustee of the Solid Waste Standby Trust for
        the Debtor for the failure of the Debtor to pay the fee.
        The LDEQ website is not complete but appears to contain
        limited information indicating that the Debtor is not in
        compliance.  The Disclosure Statement fails to address any

        of these issues or any environmental issues.  The
        Disclosure Statement fails to address any exposure or
        potential environmental liability arising out of the
        cancellation of the trust agreement.  The provisions of 11

        U.S.C. 1125 do not require or place the burden of proof
        upon creditors and parties in interest to research and
        ferret out information which should be willingly and fully
        disclosed by the Debtor.

A copy of the Objection is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/lawb16-81024-345.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on May 23, 2017, the
Debtor filed with the Court a first amended disclosure statement
for the Debtor's first amended plan of liquidation dated May 15,
2017.  Under the plan, holders of Class 4 Allowed Unsecured Claims
would receive a pro rata distribution, up to the allowed amount of
each Class 4 Claim, from the proceeds of the sale after the
Unclassified Claims and Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 Claims have
been paid in full.

Cleco Power is represented by:

     WHEELIS & ROZANSKI
     Stephen D. Wheelis, Esq.
     Richard A. Rozanski, Esq.
     P.O. Box 13199
     Alexandria, Louisiana 71315-3199
     Tel: (318) 445-5600
     
                 About Revolution Aluminum Propco

Revolution Aluminum Propco, LLC is a Louisiana company established
in 2015.  It owns a real property comprised of approximately 1,400
acres in Pineville, Louisiana.  The property, which is the
Company's sole asset, is an industrial park and the former site of
a paper mill.

Revolution Aluminum Propco is 100% owned by its parent company,
Revolution Aluminum LLC, and is managed by Roger Boggs.

Ryan & Associates, Inc., Engineered Products, Inc., and Tina J.
Hertzel filed an involuntary Chapter 11 case (Bankr. W.D. La., Case
No. 16-81024) against Revolution Aluminum Propco on Sept. 15, 2016.
The Court entered an order officially placing the Debtor in
bankruptcy on Feb. 1, 2017.

The petitioning creditors are represented by Bradley L. Drell,
Esq., at Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell.  

Steffes, Vingiello & McKenzie, LLC serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor hired Beau Box Real Estate as real
estate broker and manager.

On March 16, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee hired
Gold Weems Bruser Sues & Rundell, APLC, as counsel.

No trustee or examiner has been appointed.


REVOLUTION ALUMINUM: To Pay Debts Using Real Estate Sale Proceeds
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Revolution Aluminum Propco, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Louisiana a second amended
disclosure statement for the Debtor's first amended plan of
liquidation dated Sept. 13, 2017.

The Debtor has sought and obtained the Court's approval to employ
Beau Box Real Estate as real estate broker and manager to market
and sell certain real estate comprised of approximately 1,400 acres
in Pineville, Louisiana, on which an industrial site is planned.
The Plan proposes to make distributions from cash on hand and the
proceeds received from the sale of the Property.

The Class 3 Allowed Secured Claim of Carr's Dirt Works and Pipeline
Services, Inc. -- total estimate of the allowed Class 3 Claim is
approximately $0 -- is impaired by the Plan.  Any Allowed Class 3
Claim will be paid in cash equal to either (1) the allowed amount
of its claim or (2) lesser amount as to which the Class 3 Claimant
agrees after the Effective Date as soon as practicable following
the Sale of the Property in full satisfaction of its Class 3 Claim.
If there are insufficient funds available from the Sale to pay all
of the Class 3 Claim in full, if and to the extent that the Class 3
Claim is allowed and determined to be secured by a valid lien
affecting the Property, then the Effective Date will not occur and
confirmation of the Plan will be subject to revocation.  The Debtor
disputes that Carr's has a valid secured claim arising out of any
lien or privilege and has filed Adversary Proceeding Number
17-08004 seeking avoidance of its claim.

The holders of the Allowed Class 4 Claims -- estimated at
$3,223,067.62 -- will receive a pro rata distribution, up to the
allowed amount of each Class 4 Claim, from the proceeds of the sale
after the Allowed Unclassified Claims, any Allowed Class 1 Claim,
Allowed Class 2 Claim and any Allowed Class 3 Claim have been paid
as agreed.  Once all Unclassified Claims, Class 1 Claims, Class 2
Claims, Class 3 Claims and Class 4 Claims have been paid in full as
provided in the Plan, the holders of the Equity Interests will
receive pro rata distributions of any remaining proceeds of the
sale.  Class 4 is impaired by the Plan.

A copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/lawb16-81024-347.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on May 23, 2017, the
Debtor filed with the Court a first amended disclosure statement
for the Debtor's first amended plan of liquidation dated May 15,
2017.  Under the plan, holders of Class 4 Allowed Unsecured Claims
would receive a pro rata distribution, up to the allowed amount of
each Class 4 Claim, from the proceeds of the sale after the
Unclassified Claims and Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 Claims have
been paid in full.

                 About Revolution Aluminum Propco

Revolution Aluminum Propco, LLC is a Louisiana company established
in 2015.  It owns a real property comprised of approximately 1,400
acres in Pineville, Louisiana.  The property, which is the
Company's sole asset, is an industrial park and the former site of
a paper mill.

Revolution Aluminum Propco is 100% owned by its parent company,
Revolution Aluminum LLC, and is managed by Roger Boggs.

Ryan & Associates, Inc., Engineered Products, Inc., and Tina J.
Hertzel filed an involuntary Chapter 11 case (Bankr. W.D. La., Case
No. 16-81024) against Revolution Aluminum Propco on Sept. 15, 2016.
The Court entered an order officially placing the Debtor in
bankruptcy on Feb. 1, 2017.

The petitioning creditors are represented by Bradley L. Drell,
Esq., at Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell.  

Steffes, Vingiello & McKenzie, LLC serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor hired Beau Box Real Estate as real
estate broker and manager.

On March 16, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee hired
Gold Weems Bruser Sues & Rundell, APLC, as counsel.

No trustee or examiner has been appointed.


REX ENERGY: Signs Marketing Agreement with BP Energy
----------------------------------------------------
Rex Energy Corporation announced its second quarter 2017 financial
and operational results.

Financial Update

* Marketing Agreement with BP Energy Company

Rex Energy recently entered into a comprehensive marketing
arrangement with BP Energy Company, an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of BP plc (NYSE: BP), pursuant to which BP Energy
Company will market the majority of Rex's liquid C3+ products
stream, and provide credit support on behalf of Rex Energy.  The
arrangement also enhances several of the company's existing
marketing initiatives in the Butler and Warrior North operating
areas.

Beginning Jan. 1, 2018, BP Energy Company will purchase the
majority of the Company's C3+ products stream for an extended term.
The pricing structure compares favorably to actual 2016 and
projected 2017 prices.  The new pricing structure will help to
mitigate the historical fluctuations between summer and winter
pricing and stabilize the company’s quarterly cash flows.  As
part of the new marketing arrangement, Rex Energy has reduced
outstanding letters of credit by approximately $14.1 million,
immediately increasing liquidity on the company’s $300 million
delayed draw term loan facility.  Also, as part of the broader
marketing initiatives, BP Energy Company will market a portion of
Rex Energy's Warrior North gas at an improved differential to the
current Dom South pricing.

"I'm very excited to expand our existing relationship with BP,"
said Tom Stabley, Rex Energy's president and chief executive
officer.  "The relationship we have developed and grown with BP
over the past several years has been a major key to Rex Energy's
success.  This is another testament to the confidence placed in the
company's reserves and development capabilities.  I look forward to
this new, deeper relationship, and to continuing to expand it in
the years to come."

* Sale of Salineville Waterline

In July, the Company sold its Salineville, OH waterline and related
assets to Keystone Clearwater Services (KCS) for a total
consideration of approximately $8.0 million.  The Salineville
waterline provided water for completions in the Warrior North area.
In connection with the sale of the waterline, Rex Energy entered
into a lease agreement with KCS to secure water services for future
completions in the Warrior North area.

* Warrior North Area Condensate

Rex Energy has entered into a new term condensate agreement with
Marathon Petroleum Corporation pursuant to which the company will
receive an improved condensate differential on all of its
production in the Warrior North Area beginning Sept. 1, 2017.

* Improving Natural Gas Basis Differentials

During the first half of 2017, the Company's realized natural gas
prices improved due to tightening differentials in the northeast
markets and the full realization of its Gulf Coast transport
contracts.  The unhedged realized natural gas price for the first
half of 2017 was $2.94 and the natural gas basis differential was
($0.24) off of NYMEX.  As a result, the company expects its
full-year 2017 natural gas basis differential, including the
effects of basis hedging, to improve to ($0.35) -- ($0.45) off of
NYMEX as compared to the previous estimate of ($0.58) -- ($0.68)
off of NYMEX.

               Second Quarter Financial Results

Operating revenue from continuing operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2017, was $47.5 million and $99.5 million,
respectively, which represents an increase of 52% and 75% over the
same periods in 2016.  Commodity revenues, including settlements
from derivatives, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,
were $45.4 million and $94.0 million, respectively, a decrease of
7% and an increase of 7% from the same periods in 2016.  Commodity
revenues from natural gas liquids (NGLs) and condensate, including
settlements from derivatives, represented 39% of total commodity
revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2017.

Lease operating expense (LOE) from continuing operations was $29.4
million, or $1.82 per Mcfe for the quarter.  For the six months
ended June 30, 2017, LOE was approximately $58.3 million, or $1.84
per Mcfe.  General and administrative (G&A) expenses from
continuing operations were $4.3 million for the second quarter of
2017, or $0.27 per Mcfe.  For the six months ended June 30, 2017,
G&A expenses from continuing operations were $8.8 million, or $0.28
per Mcfe.  Cash G&A expenses from continuing operations (a non-GAAP
measure) for the three months ended June 30, 2017 were $3.8
million, or $0.23 per Mcfe, a 16% increase on a per unit basis as
compared to the same period in 2016.  For the six months ended June
30, 2017, cash G&A expenses from continuing operations (a non-GAAP
measure) were $8.3 million, or $0.26 per Mcfe, consistent on a per
unit basis when compared to the same period in 2016.

Net loss attributable to common shareholders for the three months
ended June 30, 2017, was $10.2 million, or $1.03 per basic share.
Net loss attributable to common shareholders for the six months
ended June 30, 2017, was $8.1 million, or $0.83 per basic share.
Adjusted net loss, a non-GAAP measure, for the three months ended
June 30, 2017, was $9.2 million, or $0.93 per share. Adjusted net
loss for the six months ended June 30, 2017, was $14.7 million, or
$1.50 per share.

EBITDAX from continuing operations, a non-GAAP measure, was $12.4
million for the second quarter of 2017 and $28.0 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2017.

          Production Results and Price Realizations

Second quarter 2017 production volumes from continuing operations
were 177.1 MMcfe/d, consisting of 108.7 MMcf/d of natural gas, 4.8
Mbbls/d of C3+ NGLs, 5.8 Mbbls/d of ethane and 0.8 Mbbls/d of
condensate.  NGLs (including ethane) and condensate accounted for
39% of net production for the second quarter of 2017. Second
quarter production was constrained during the quarter due to
unplanned maintenance downtime in the Company's midstream services.
The unplanned maintenance downtime adversely effected production
during the second quarter by approximately 3.5 MMcfe/d.

Including the effects of cash-settled derivatives, realized prices
for the three months ended June 30, 2017, were $2.78 per Mcf for
natural gas, $21.62 per barrel for C3+ NGLs, $9.93 per barrel for
ethane and $44.35 per barrel for condensate.  Before the effects of
hedging, realized prices for the three months ended June 30, 2017,
were $2.94 per Mcf for natural gas, $23.03 per barrel for C3+ NGLs,
$9.96 per barrel for ethane and $42.35 per barrel for condensate.

Including the effects of cash-settled derivatives, realized prices
for the six months ended June 30, 2017, were $2.91 per Mcf for
natural gas, $23.37 per barrel for C3+ NGLs, $9.84 per barrel for
ethane and $45.26 per barrel for condensate.  Before the effects of
hedging, realized prices for the six months ended June 30, 2017
were $3.05 per Mcf for natural gas, $26.86 per barrel for C3+ NGLs,
$9.74 per barrel for ethane and $44.25 per barrel for condensate.

            Second Quarter 2017 Capital Investments

For the second quarter of 2017, net operational capital investments
were approximately $29.1 million.  The Company expects to be
reimbursed by joint development partners for approximately $13.4
million of previously incurred costs that were not billed until the
third quarter of 2017.  Capital investments in the second quarter
of 2017 funded the drilling of six gross (4.8 net) wells, fracture
stimulation of six gross (3.1 net) wells and other projects related
to drilling and completing wells in the Appalachian Basin.  Net
operated capital expenditures for the full-year 2017 are still
expected to be within the range of the Company's previously issued
guidance of $115.0 million - $130.0 million.

                         Operational Update

* Moraine East Area

In the Moraine East Area, the Company drilled two gross (two net)
wells, completed six gross (3.1 net) wells and placed into sales
four gross (1.4 net) wells in the second quarter of 2017.  In
addition, the company had nine gross (4.9) net wells awaiting
completion at the end of the second quarter.

The Company has begun initial sales from its six-well Shields pad.
The six wells were drilled to an average lateral length of
approximately 8,800 feet and completed in an average of 49 stages.
In addition, the Company has completed two of the Shields wells
with engineered spacing designs as compared to its

standard spacing design.  The Company expects to provide an update
on the performance of the pad in the coming weeks.

The Company recently finished completing the four wells on the
Mackrell pad, which were drilled to an average lateral length of
7,630 feet.  The wells are expected to be placed into sales in
early September 2017 as scheduled.  Lastly, the Company recently
finished drilling the two-wells on the Frye pad, which were drilled
to an average lateral length of approximately 6,300 feet. The
two-well Frye pad is currently being completed and is expected to
be placed into sales in the third quarter of 2017.

The twelve wells discussed above are all on the eastern side of the
Moraine East Area and will be the final delineation of the field.
The Company now expects to place additional compression for the
Moraine East Area into service in early January 2018, a delay
compared to previous estimates of early fourth quarter service,
which, in turn, will defer peak production from the area until
January 2018.

* Legacy Butler Operated Area

In the Legacy Butler Operated Area, the Company has begun
completing the four-well Wilson pad.  The four wells were drilled
to an average lateral length of approximately 9,300 feet and are
expected to be placed into sales in the fourth quarter of 2017.

* Warrior North Area

In the Warrior North Area, the Company has finished drilling the
three-well Jenkins pad.  The three wells were drilled to an average
lateral length of approximately 6,500 feet and in an average of
13.2 drilling days, the best average the Company has achieved in
the Warrior North Area.  The three wells are expected to be
completed at the end of the fourth quarter of 2017.

          Third Quarter and Full Year 2017 Guidance

Rex Energy is providing guidance for the third quarter of 2017 and
adjusted full-year 2017.  Full-year 2017 production guidance has
been reduced to 180.0 - 190.0 MMcfe/d due to midstream restrictions
and delays in placing the Vaughn and Baird pads into sales in the
first half of 2017.  The Company still expects to achieve its
year-end 2017 exit rate production growth rate guidance of 15% -
20% upon the commissioning of its fourth compressor in the Moraine
East Area, which is scheduled for
Jan. 5, 2018.  This will allow the company to remain on target to
meet its full-year 2018 production guidance of 255.0 - 265.0
MMcfe/d.

                  About Rex Energy Corporation

Headquartered in State College, Pennsylvania, Rex Energy is an
independent oil and gas exploration and production company with its
core operations in the Appalachian Basin.  The Company's strategy
is to pursue its higher potential exploration drilling prospects
while acquiring oil and natural gas properties complementary to its
portfolio.

Rex Energy reported a net loss of $176.7 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2016, a net loss of $361.0 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2015, and a net loss of $42.65 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2014.  As of June 30, 2017, Rex Energy had $905.57 million in
total assets, $901.87 million in total liabilities and $3.69
million in total stockholders' equity.

                          *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on April 6, 2016, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services said that it lowered its corporate credit rating on Rex
Energy Corp. to 'SD' from 'CC'.  "The downgrade follows Rex's
announcement that it has closed an exchange offer to existing
holders of its 8.875% and 6.25% senior unsecured notes for a new
issue of 8% senior secured second-lien notes due 2020 (not rated)
and shares of common equity," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst
Aaron McLean.

REX Energy Corporation carries a Ca Corporate Family Rating from
Moody's Investors Service.  "The downgrade reflects the poor
overall recovery prospects as indicated by REXX's PV-10 value.  The
negative outlook is driven by the weak commodity price environment,
specifically in natural gas pricing, which could further erode
REXX's recovery value," commented Sreedhar Kona, Moody's senior
analyst, as reported by the TCR on April 5, 2016.


RISE ENTERPRISES: Seeks Approval of Cash Collateral Agreement
-------------------------------------------------------------
Rise Enterprises, S.E., and Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, Inc.,
filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto
Rico a joint motion for approval of a provisional agreement for the
Rise Enterprises' use of cash collateral.

Specifically, the Debtor and Banco Popular seek authorization for
the use of cash collateral until October 5, 2017, for which the
Debtor will pay $6,202 as interim adequate protection to be paid in
the following manner: $2,684 for the use of cash collateral until
Sept. 5, and $3,518 for the use of cash collateral until Oct. 5.

The Debtor acknowledges that Banco Popular has a lien on the cash
collateral and has listed Banco Popular as a secured creditor with
various claims that amount to about $1,641,753.

A provisional agreement was reached on Aug. 3, 2017, wherein Banco
Popular consents to the use of cash collateral until Sept. 5, 2017
and in exchange thereof the Debtor will pay $2,684 as interim
adequate protection.  Subsequently, the Debtor and Banco Popular
have agreed to extend the aforementioned provisional remedy for
additional 30 days. In exchange thereto, the Debtor agrees to pay
Banco Popular $3,518 as interim adequate compensation.

The Debtor will use the cash collateral funds solely for its
ordinary business operating expenses as reflected in the proposed
Budget, which provides total expenses of approximately $49,245.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Sept. 5, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/OMAj4A

A copy of the Debtor's Budget is available at https://is.gd/uky0H5

Banco Popular is represented by:

          Roberto Abesada-Aguet, Esq.
          Sergio E. Criado, Esq.
          Correa-Acevedo & Abesada Law Offices, PSC
          # 90 Carr. 165, Suite 407
          Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, 00968
          Tel.: (787) 273-8300
          Fax: (787) 273-8379
          E-mail: ra@calopsc.com
                  scriado@calopsc.com

                     About Rise Enterprises

Rise Enterprises, S.E., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 17-04678) on June 30, 2017.
Ismael Falcon Ortega, partner, signed the petition.  The Debtor
estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  Judge Mildred Caban Flores presides over
the case.  Mary Ann Gandia, Esq., at Gandia-Fabian Law Office,
serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


ROCKY PINE: Wants to Use Cash Collateral for 90 Days
----------------------------------------------------
Rocky Pine Farms, LLC, seeks permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Ohio to use cash collateral to
make payments as are necessary for the continuation of its business
as shown in the budget for the next 90 days.

The majority of the Debtor's value arises from its ongoing
operations, and its ability to continue servicing its customers.
Without authority to use cash collateral the Debtor will suffer
irreparable harm because it will be forced to shut down all of its
operations.

Without the ability to use funds, the Debtor will be unable to
obtain all the goods and services needed on a daily basis to
operate.

On the Petition Date, the Debtor believes that it had the following
cash collateral, consisting of proceeds of:

     a. cash of approximately $71,773.02; and

     b. accounts receivable valued at approximately $87,000 giving

        an estimated total cash value of $ 158,773.02.

Commencing in 2016 in an effort to gain the use of immediate funds
for operations, the Debtor obtained merchant agreements the Debtor
entered into agreements with these creditors:

     a. Yellowstone Capital LLC merchant agreement with purchase
        of accounts receivable and security agreements;

     b. Retail Capital LLC, dba Credibly, merchant agreement with
        purchase of accounts receivable and security agreements;

     c. New Era Lending and merchant agreement with purchase of
        accounts receivable and security agreements; and

     d. Knight Capital Funding merchant agreement with purchase of

        accounts receivable and security agreements.

The Debtor does not believe that any other entity other than the
Prepetition Secured Creditors has a lien or claim in the cash
collateral.  The Debtor believes that some or all of the
Prepetition Secured Creditors claims may be disputed and reserves
the right of the Debtor and other parties in interest to determine
the extent and priority of the respective claims.  The replacement
liens will be subject to final determination and approval of the
Court as to the extent and priority of the listed creditors.

The budget projects the Debtor's anticipated revenue and expenses
and demonstrates the amount of funds the Debtor must expend on its
operations over a 90-day period and the Debtor projects that it
will need to spend $835,000 to avoid immediate and irreparable
harm.  The Debtor requests authority to spend that amount in
accordance with the budget, with a 20% variance for each line item.


The Debtor warns that absent the ability to use cash collateral,
the Debtor would be required to shut down all operations.  The
Debtor's revenues exceed the necessary expense and it is
anticipated that cash collateral values will actually increase over
the budget period.

The Debtor proposes that as and for adequate protection under
Sections 363 and 361 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, for the security
interest of the Prepetition Secured Creditor, the Debtor offers
replacement liens in the Debtor's cash collateral now owned or
hereafter acquired.  

A copy of the Debtor's request is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/ohnb17-32918-6.pdf

                     About Rocky Pine Farms

Headquartered in Tiffin, Ohio, Rocky Pine Farms, LLC, was founded
in 2007.  It is a small organization in the crop farms industry.

Rocky Pine Farms filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
N.D. Ohio Case No. 17-32918) on Sept. 12, 2017, estimating its
assets at between $100,000 and $500,000, and $1 million and $10
million in liabilities.  The petition was signed by Patricia Nye,
president.

Judge Mary Ann Whipple presides over the case.

Raymond L. Beebe, Esq., at Raymond L Beebe CO LPA, serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


RUE21 INC: Landlords Object to Plan Assumption Schedules
--------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that multiple parties, which include
Posner Park Retail; Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust and Phillips
Edison & Company; IREIT Louisville Dixie Valley, IREIT West Valley
City Lake Park and Duluth (Gwinnett) SSR, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court separate objections to the proposed cure amount
provided in the assumption schedules embodied in rue21 inc.'s
Chapter 11 plan.  

According to the report, the objection of landlords
Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust and Phillips Edison & Company
asserts, "The claims set fort are the base cure claim amounts
subject to additional qualifications and modifications (such as
reimbursement of attorney's fees) and reconciliation amount.
Landlords note that additional amounts, not as yet known, may also
be due with regard to calendar years 2016 and 2017, such as
year-end adjustments to various items including, but not limited
to, real estates, common area maintenance (CAM), percentage rent
and insurance.  Section 365(b) of the Code requires that a debtor
cure all defaults in conjunction with a lease assumption.  Since
certain accrued, unbilled items may not have been invoiced to date,
there can be no default for the failure to pay same. The Debtors
cannot assume the favourable portions and reject the unfavourable
provisions of their leases. As such, Landlords request that they be
reimbursed for all of their actual pecuniary losses including, but
not limited to, attorney's fees and costs expended with regard to
Debtor's bankruptcy proceedings."

The Court confirmed rue21's First Amended Joint Plan of
Reorganization on September 8, 2017.

                        About rue21, Inc.

rue21, Inc. — http://www.rue21.com/— is a teen specialty
apparel retailer. For over 37 years, rue21 has been famous for
offering the latest trends at an affordable price point.  It has
core brands in girls' apparel (rue21), intimate apparel (true),
girls' accessories (etc!), girls' cosmetics (ruebeaute!), guys'
apparel and accessories (Carbon), girls' plus-size apparel (rue+),
and girls' swimwear (ruebleu). The company is headquartered in
Warrendale, Pennsylvania and have one distribution center located
in Weirton, West Virginia.

Headquartered just north of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, rue21 had
1,179 stores in 48 states in shopping malls, outlets and strip
centers, and on its website.  In April, Company began the process
of closing approximately 400 underperforming stores in its 1,179
store fleet in order to streamline operations.

On May 15, 2017, rue21, inc., and its affiliates filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. W.D. Pa., Lead Case No. 17-22045).  rue21 estimated $1
billion to $10 billion in assets and liabilities.  Todd M. Lenhart,
the Company's senior vice president, treasurer, chief financial
officer, and chief accounting officer, signed the petitions.  The
Honorable Gregory L. Taddonio presides over the cases.

The Debtors tapped Reed Smith LLP as local counsel; Kirkland &
Ellis LLP as bankruptcy counsel; Rothschild Inc., as investment
banker; Berkeley Research Group, LLC, as financial advisor; A&G
Realty Partners, LLC, as real estate advisor and consultant; and
Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims and notice agent.

Counsel to the DIP Term Loan Agent, DIP Term Loan Lenders,
Prepetition Term Loan Agent and Term Loan Steering Committee are
Scott J. Greenberg, Esq., Michael J. Cohen, Esq., and Jeffrey J.
Bresch, Esq., at Jones Day.

Counsel to the DIP ABL Agent and the Prepetition ABL Agent are
Julia Frost-Davies, Esq., and Amelia C. Joiner, Esq., at Morgan
Lewis & Bockius LLP; and James D. Newell, Esq., and Timothy Palmer,
Esq., at Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC.

The Sponsor Lenders are represented by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett's
Elisha D. Graff, Esq.

An Ad Hoc Cross-Holder Group is represented by Milbank, Tweed,
Hadley & McCloy’s Gerard Uzzi, Esq., and Eric Stodola, Esq.

Andrew R. Vara, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, on May 23, 2017,
appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors. The Committee has tapped Cooley LLP as
counsel; and Fox Rothschild LLP as local counsel.


RYCKMAN CREEK: Hires Great American as Valuation Consultant
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ryckman Creek Resources, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to employ Great American Group Advisory & Valuation
Services, L.L.C., as valuation consultant to the Debtor.

Ryckman Creek requires Great American to provide the Debtors with a
projection of the gross and net values of the assets based on
physical inspections at the Debtors' natural gas storage facility
in Evanston, Wyoming.

The valuation will include:

   a. an explanation of valuation methodology;

   b. company and valuation overviews;

   c. description of the probable liquidation scenarios; and

   d. possible liquidation strategies and timeliness.

Great American will be paid a fee of $35,000. The firm will also be
reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Drew Jakubek, a partner of Great American Group Advisory &
Valuation Services, L.L.C., assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtors and their estates.

Great American can be reached at:

     Drew Jakubek
     AMERICAN GROUP ADVISORY &
     VALUATION SERVICES, L.L.C.
     21255 Burbank Blvd., Suite 400
     Woodland Hills, CA 91367
     Tel: (818) 884-3737
     Fax: (818) 746-9917

              About Ryckman Creek Resources, LLC

Formed on Sept. 8, 2009, Ryckman Creek Resources, LLC, is engaged
in the acquisition, development, marketing, and operation of a
natural gas storage facility known as the Ryckman Creek Facility.

The Ryckman Creek Facility is a depleted crude oil and natural gas
reservoir located in Uinta County, Wyoming.  The company began
development of the reservoir into a natural gas storage facility in
2011.  The Ryckman Creek Facility began commercial operations in
late 2012 and received injections of customer gas and gas purchased
by the company.  The company and its affiliated debtors have
approximately 35 employees.

Ryckman Creek Resources, LLC, Ryckman Creek Resources Holdings LLC,
Peregrine Rocky Mountains LLC and Peregrine Midstream Partners LLC
filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
16-10292) on Feb. 2, 2016. The petitions were signed by Robert Foss
as chief executive officer. Kevin J. Carey has been assigned the
case.

The Debtors hired Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP as
counsel; AP Services, LLC, as management provider; Evercore Group
LLC as investment banker; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as
claims and noticing agent.

On April 11, 2016, Ryckman Creek Resources disclosed total assets
of more than $205 million and total debt of more than $391.2
million.

On Feb. 12, 2016, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Attorneys for the
committee are Greenberg Traurig, LLP's Dennis A. Meloro, Esq.,
David B. Kurzweil, Esq., and Shari L. Heyen, Esq. The committee
retained Alvarez & Marsal, LLC, as financial advisor.


SAMUEL J. HAMILTON: York Industrial Board Buying Equipment for $45K
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Samuel J. Hamilton at York, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Alabama to authorize the private sale of
its right, title and interest in grocery store equipment, which is
located in a leased property located at 205 2nd Avenue, York,
Alabama, to City of York Industrial Board for $45,000.

The Debtor owns the Equipment which includes refrigeration units,
heating equipment, display counters, shelving, and cooling
equipment, among other items.  The equipment has been marketed for
several months by a Samuel J. Hamilton.

There are no known liens, mortgages, or other interests in the
property sought to be sold, however, the Debtor reserves the right
to contest the validity, priority, and extent of any claim, lien or
other interest if any exist.

The Debtor proposes to sell the Equipment to the Buyer, an agency
of the City of York, Alabama, free and clear of any and all
mortgages, liens, interests and/or other encumbrances as set forth.
The proposed sale of the Equipment will be by private sale.  The
Buyer and the Debtor have entered into a contract to purchase the
Equipment.  The contemplated sale price is $45,000.  Upon
completion of the sale, the proceeds will be deposited into the DIP
Account, and will be accounted for to the Bankruptcy Administrator
through monthly operating reports.

The Debtor has determined, in its sound business judgment, that
proceeding with the sale as requested is in the best interests of
the Estate and its creditors.  The proposed sale will generate cash
for use in the estate, and should not hamper the Debtor's ability
to operate going forward.  The Equipment identified herein is not
necessary for its effective reorganization.

A copy of the list of Equipment to be sold and the Agreement
attached to the Motion is available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Samuel_Hamilton_29_Sales.pdf

            About Samuel J. Hamilton at York, LLC

Samuel J. Hamilton at York, LLC filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. N.D.Ala Case No. 17-71253) on July 14, 2017.  Lee
Benton, Esq., at Benton & Centeno, LLP, serves as bankruptcy
counsel.

The Debtor's assets and liabilities are both below $1 million.


SEADRILL LTD: U.S. Trustee Forms 7-Member Creditors' Committee
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 7, on September 22, appointed seven
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 cases of Seadrill Limited and its affiliates.

The committee members are:

     (1) Nordic Trustee AS
         Attn: Fredrik Lundberg/Lars Erik Laerum
         Haakon VII Gate 1
         0161 Oslo Norway
         Tel: +47 22 879424 / +47 22 879406
         Email: lundberg@nordictrustee.com
         Email: laerum@nordictrustee.com

     (2) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
         Attn: Rodney Gaughan
         Global Transaction Banking -
         Trust and Agency Services
         Harborside Financial Center
         100 Plaza One, MS:JCY03-0801
         Jersey City, NJ 07311-3901
         Tel: 201-593-4016
         Email: rodney.gaughan@db.com

         Counsel: Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP
         Glenn E. Siegel, Esq.
         101 Park Avenue
         New York, NY 10128
         Tel: 212-309-6780
         Fax: 212-309-6001
         Email: glenn.siegel@morganlewis.com

         Counsel: Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP
         Rachel Jaffe Mauceri, Esq.
         1701 Market St.
         Philadelphia, PA 19103
         Tel: 215-963-5515
         Fax: 215-963-5001
         Email: rachel.mauceri@morganlewis.com

     (3) Computershare Trust Company, N.A. and
         Computershare Trust Company of Canada
         Attn: Robert Major
         8742 Lucent Blvd., Suite 225
         Highlands Ranch, CO 80129
         Tel: 781-856-7020
         Email: robert.major@computershare.com

         Counsel: Emmet, Marvin & Martin, LLP
         Thomas A. Pitta, Esq.
         120 Broadway, 32nd Floor
         New York, NY 10271
         Tel: 212-238-3148
         Fax: 212-238-3100
         Email: tpitta@emmetmarvin.com

     (4) Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine
         Engineering Co., Ltd.
         Attn: Jongsang Lee
         125, Namdaemun-ro, Jung-so
         Seoul, 04521 Korea
         Tel: +82-2-2129-0374
         Fax: +82-2-2129-0077
         Email: jongsang@dsme.co.kr

         Counsel: Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP
         Shirley S. Cho, Esq.
         10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Floor
         Los Angeles, CA 90067
         Tel: 310-772-2364
         Fax: 310-201-0760
         Email: scho@pszjlaw.com

     (5) Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.
         Attn: Stephen S. Row
         34th Floor, Samsung Life Insurance
         Seocho Tower 1321-15
         Seocho-Dong, Seocho-Gu
         Seoul, Korea 137-857
         Tel: +82 5171 6167
         Fax: +82 2 3458 7369
         Email: stephen.row@samsung.com

         Counsel: Hogan Lovells US LLP
         Robin Keller, Esq.
         Ronald Silverman, Esq.
         875 Third Avenue
         New York, NY 10022
         Tel: 212-918-3000
         Fax: 212-918-3001
         Email: robin.keller@hoganlovells.com
         Email: ronald.silverman@hoganlovells.com

     (6) Pentagon Freight Services, Inc.
         Attn: Les Watson
         1211 E. Richey Rd.
         Houston, TX 77073
         Tel: 281-209-8800
         Email: les.watson@pfshouston.com

     (7) Louisiana Machinery Co., LLC
         Attn: Cory Calcagno
         3799 W. Airline Hwy.
         Reserve, LA 70084
         Tel: 985-536-1121
         Email: cory.calcagno@louisianacat.com

Official creditors' committees have the right to employ legal and
accounting professionals and financial advisors, at a debtor's
expense. They may investigate the debtor's business and financial
affairs. Importantly, official committees serve as fiduciaries to
the general population of creditors they represent.

                       About Seadrill Ltd.

Seadrill Limited is a deepwater drilling contractor providing
drilling services to the oil and gas industry.  It is incorporated
in Bermuda and managed from London.  Seadrill and its affiliates
own or lease 51 drilling rigs, which represents more than 6% of the
world fleet.

As of Sept. 12, 2017, Seadrill employs 3,760 highly-skilled
individuals across 22 countries and five continents to operate
their drilling rigs and perform various other corporate functions.

As of June 30, 2017, Seadrill had $20.71 billion in total assets,
$10.77 billion in total liabilities and $9.94 billion in total
equity.

Seadrill reported a net loss of US$155 million on US$3.17 billion
of total operating revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
following a net loss of US$635 million on US$4.33 billion of total
operating revenues for the year ended in 2015.

After reaching terms of a reorganization plan that would
restructure $8 billion of funded debt, on Sept. 12, 2017, Seadrill
Limited and 85 affiliated debtors each filed a voluntary petition
for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in
the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas.  The
Debtors have requested that their Chapter 11 cases be jointly
administered under Case No. 17-60079.

Together with the chapter 11 proceedings, Seadrill, North Atlantic
Drilling Limited ("NADL") and Sevan Drilling Limited ("Sevan") are
commencing liquidation proceedings in Bermuda to appoint joint
provisional liquidators and facilitate recognition and
implementation of the transactions contemplated by the RSA and
Investment Agreement, and Simon Edel, Alan Bloom and Roy Bailey of
Ernst & Young are to act as the joint and several provisional
liquidators.

In the Chapter 11 cases, the Company has engaged Kirkland & Ellis
LLP as legal counsel, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. as financial advisor,
and Alvarez & Marsal as restructuring advisor.  Slaughter and May
has been engaged as corporate counsel, and Morgan Stanley served as
co-financial advisor during the negotiation of the restructuring
agreement.  Advokatfirmaet Thommessen AS is serving as Norwegian
counsel.  Conyers Dill & Pearman is serving as Bermuda counsel.
Prime Clerk is the claims agent and maintains the Web site
https://cases.primeclerk.com/seadrill


SIERRA CHEMICAL: Has Nod to Secure $1.2M Financing From Carus
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Bruce T. Beesley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada has authorized Sierra Chemical Co. to obtain
additional postpetition credit.

The Debtor is authorized to execute and perform under the proposed
Carus Line of Credit Note dated Sept. 13, 2017, reflecting a line
of credit in the amount of $1.2 million and that Carus Corporation
will be allowed an administrative expense pursuant to Section
503(b)(1) for all amounts advanced to the Debtor under the line of
credit, such amounts not to exceed $1.2 million.

A copy of the Order is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb17-51019-108.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Sept. 18, 2017, the
Debtor sought court authorization to incur unsecured debt from
Carus to fund the Debtor's continued operations.  Pursuant to the
terms of the proposed financing, the Debtor will receive a line of
credit from CARUS in the amount of $1.2 million, to allow Debtor to
fund its estate, continue its day to day operations, including
paying vendors which are now demanding COD terms for new orders,
and to pay the Debtor's counsel and other retained professionals
for services rendered on behalf of the Debtor's estate and its
creditors.  The line of credit would also be used to allow the
Debtor to remain current in its debt service to its secured lender,
Bank of America.

                   About Sierra Chemical Co.

Headquartered in Sparks, Nevada, Sierra Chemical Co., a Carus Group
Inc. company, manufactures and distributes environmental chemicals
for the municipal, agricultural, mining, and industrial markets.
Founded in 1959, Sierra Chemical Co. --
http://www.caruscorporation.com/page/sierra-chemical-- started as
a compressed gas supplier in Northern Nevada.  The business grew to
become a full line supplier to the industrial, mining, and
municipal markets in Nevada. Sierra expanded into Northern
California in the mid 1990's and established a production facility
in Stockton, California.

Sierra Chemical Co. was acquired by Carus Group Inc. in 2011.  As a
result, Sierra's product line has expanded to include CAIROX
Potassium Permanganate, CARUSOL Sodium Permanganate, and the Carus
Phosphates Family of products.

Sierra Chemical filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D. Nev. Case No. 17-51019) on Aug. 30, 2017, estimating its assets
at between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities at between
$10 million and $50 million.  The petition was signed by David J.
Kuzy, its president.

Judge Bruce T. Beesley presides over the case.

Robert R. Benjamin, Esq., Anthony J. D'Agostino, Esq., Caren A.
Lederer, Esq., and Barbara L Yong, Esq., at Golan Christie Taglia
LLP; and Stephen R Harris, Esq., at Harris Law Practice LLC, serve
as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


SK HOLDCO: S&P Affirms 'B-' CCR, Outlook Remains Stable
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B-' corporate credit rating on SK
HoldCo LLC. The outlook remains stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we affirmed our 'B' issue-level rating
on the company's senior secured debt. The '2' recovery rating
remains unchanged, indicating our expectation for substantial
(70%-90%; rounded estimate: 70%) recovery in the event of a payment
default.

"Additionally, we affirmed our 'CCC' issue-level rating on SK
HoldCo's senior unsecured notes. The '6' recovery rating remains
unchanged, indicating our expectation for negligible recovery
(0%-10%; rounded estimate: 0%) in the event of a payment default."

SK HoldCo operates light-vehicle collision repair shops in the U.S.
The company's economically resilient business model is offset by
its aggressive expansion strategy--which entails significant
integration risk--and its narrow scope, scale, and geographic and
business diversity (the company only operates in certain locales in
the U.S. and its business is solely focused on collision repair
services).

S&P said, "The stable outlook on SK HoldCo reflects our belief that
the company will maintain or improve its recent EBITDA margins.
While we expect the company's reported free cash flow to be
slightly negative in 2017 because of investments for new stores and
improvements at its existing stores, we anticipate that its free
cash flow generation will improve in 2018. We also expect that SK
will maintain sufficient liquidity despite its aggressive growth
strategy.

"We could lower our ratings on SK HoldCo in the next 12 months if
the company's operating prospects reverse and it is unable to
maintain the margins and same store sales growth that we expect for
the current rating. This could occur because of integration costs
from its acquisitions or issues with its insurer relationships. We
could also consider downgrading the company if it is unable to
consistently generate positive free cash flow for multiple quarters
such that it adversely affects its liquidity, or if we feel that
the company cannot continue to employ an aggressive acquisition
strategy without causing its margins to decline (as this would
indicate an unsustainable capital structure).

"Though unlikely, we could raise our ratings on SK HoldCo over the
next 12 months if the company's debt-to-EBITDA metric falls well
below 8.0x and its FOCF-to-debt ratio approaches 5% on a sustained
basis. This could occur if the company's acquisitive strategy leads
to better-than-expected revenue growth and EBITDA margins and we
believe that there is a low likelihood for further sizeable
debt-financed acquisitions."


SOUTHWEST RANCHING: Court Confirms Arbitrator's Final Decision
--------------------------------------------------------------
A dispute in Southwest Ranching, Inc.'s Chapter 11 case arises out
of contested probate matters following the death of Cowboy Hopkins.
In 2002, the parties, including Cliff and Len Hoskins, entered
into a Global Settlement Agreement approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas.  Among other things, the
Agreement provided for the complete resolution of historic matters
and for the arbitration of future disputes arising from the
interpretation or performance of the Agreement.

On Oct. 17, 2016, the Court appointed Barbara Radnofsky as
successor arbitrator to resolve all disputes governed by paragraph
7 of the Agreement, including whether actions taken by Len Hoskins
or Marcus Rogers constituted violations of the Agreement or
permanent injunction.

On April 12, 2017, arbitrator Radnofsky issued a final decision.
Paragraph 15 of the final decision states: "The Federal Court's
Permanent Injunction entered Oct. 18, 2002, is dissolved, effective
10 days from entry of this Order." Paragraph 15 is the only aspect
of arbitrator Radnofsky's ruling that Cliff Hoskins seeks to
vacate.

The narrow issue presented to the Court is whether a
court-appointed arbitrator has the authority to modify an
injunction issued by the appointing court.

On June 21, 2017, the Court held oral arguments on the motions. The
Court took the matter under advisement on July 12, 2017. Upon
analysis, Judge Isgur confirms the arbitrator's final decision
dissolving the Federal Court's permanent injunction.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Marvin Isgur, citing several cases to support
his decision, Judge Isgur asserts that where an injunction is
issued by a court to protect a contractual right that is subject to
an arbitration clause, an arbitrator's dissolution of the
injunction is not per se invalid.

The Court is not and should not be privy to the submissions to the
arbitrator. The continuation of an injunction is a matter that may
be arbitrated. The breadth of this Court's arbitration order is
apparent. The Court finds that Arbitrator Radnofsky was acting
within her authority.

A full-text copy of Judge Isgur's Memorandum Opinion dated Sept.
19, 2017, is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/tsxb01-23337-277.pdf

The bankruptcy case is IN RE: SOUTHWEST RANCHING INC., CASE NO:
01-23337 (Bankr. S.D. Tex.).


SRQ TAXI MANAGEMENT: Hires Jennis Law as Counsel
------------------------------------------------
SRQ Taxi Management, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Florida to employ Jennis Law Firm
as counsel to the Debtor.

SRQ Taxi Management requires Jennis Law to:

   a. take all necessary action to protect and preserve the
      estate of the Debtor, including the prosecution of
      actions, the defense of any actions commenced against
      the Debtor, negotiations concerning any litigation in
      which the Debtor may be involved, and objections, when
      appropriate, to claims filed against the estate;

   b. prepare, on behalf of the Debtor, any applications,
      answers, orders, reports, and papers in connection
      with the administration of the estate;

   c. counsel the Debtor with regard to its rights and
      obligations as a debtor-in-possession;

   d. prepare and file schedules of assets and liabilities;

   e. prepare and file a chapter 11 plan of reorganization
      and corresponding disclosure statement; and

   f. perform all other necessary legal services in connection
      with the chapter 11 case.

Jennis Law will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys              $275-$450
     Paralegals             $120-$160

Jennis Law will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

David S.Jennis, a member of Jennis Law Firm, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Jennis Law can be reached at:

     David S. Jennis, Esq.
     JENNIS LAW FIRM
     606 East Madison Street
     Tampa, FL 33602
     Tel: (813) 229-2800
     Fax: (813) 229-1707
     E-mail: ecf@jennislaw.com

                 About SRQ Taxi Management, LLC

SRQ Taxi Management, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-07782) on August 31, 2017, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is
represented by David S.Jennis, Esq., at Jennis Law Firm.


TIME INC: S&P Affirms 'B' Corp Credit Rating on Debt Refinancing
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B' corporate credit rating on New
York City-based Time Inc. The outlook is stable.

U.S. media company Time Inc. is refinancing its existing $500
million revolving credit facility into a new $300 million senior
secured revolving credit facility due 2022, repaying a portion of
its existing senior secured term loan and refinancing $464 million
into a new term loan B due 2024, and issuing a new $300 million of
senior unsecured notes due 2025.  The company will use the senior
note proceeds to repay debt in a leverage-neutral transaction.

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned our 'BB-' issue-level
rating and '1' recovery rating to the company's proposed senior
secured credit facilities. The '1' recovery rating indicates our
expectation for very high (90%-100%; rounded estimate: 95%)
recovery of principal in the event of a payment default. We also
assigned our 'B' issue-level rating and '4' recovery rating to the
proposed $300 million senior secured notes due 2025. The '4'
recovery rating indicates our expectation for average (30%-50%;
rounded estimate: 35%) recovery in the event of a payment default.

"Finally, we raised our issue-level rating on the company's 5.75%
senior notes to 'B' from 'B-' and revised the recovery rating on
the notes to '4' from '5'. The '4' recovery rating indicates our
expectation for average (30%-50%; rounded estimate: 35%) recovery
in the event of a payment default."

The rating actions follow Time Inc.'s announcement of its
leverage-neutral refinancing transaction, which extends Time Inc.'s
weighted average maturity profile by about two years. The
improvement in the recovery ratings on the 5.75% senior unsecured
notes due 2022 reflects the proposed debt refinancing, which
reduces the absolute amount of priority ranking debt and
commitments, and improves recovery prospects for junior lenders in
a payment waterfall.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Time
Inc. will make steady progress executing on its competitive
repositioning and transformation program while expanding and
extending its audience, brands, and multimedia platform. We expect
the company to maintain sufficient liquidity to fund its
transformation and investment needs and demonstrate its commitment
to reducing debt and leverage.

"We could lower our rating if the company struggles to execute on
its transformation plan, it experiences sharp declines in revenue
or audience, we expect discretionary cash flow deficits, or we
expect adjusted FOCF to debt will decline and remain below 5%.

"Although less likely over the next 12 to 24 months, we could raise
the rating if the company is able to successfully position itself
for future growth by developing and growing its media properties
and multichannel audience engagement. Under this scenario we would
expect steady deleveraging, forecasted EBITDA margin approaching
the 20% area, and robust cash flow generation."


TMT USA: Latest Plan Discloses 2nd Potential OFAC Concern
---------------------------------------------------------
TMT Procurement Corporation and its debtor affiliates filed with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas a
disclosure statement for their proposed lender settlement plan of
liquidation.

This latest filing provides that in the course of their
investigation of the potential Department of the Treasury, Office
of Foreign Assets Control violation with respect to the M/V B
Whale, the Debtors' Estate Professionals discovered a second
potential OFAC concern with respect to another Vessel. Bracewell
LLP provided information concerning that concern to OFAC on April
19, 2014, and promptly reported it to the Bankruptcy Court. Because
the second potential issue involved a trans-shipment to a Debtor
Vessel from a non-Debtor vessel owned by an Affiliate of Mr. Su,
Bracewell withdrew from any further representation of the Debtors
with respect to OFAC matters. The Debtors are not aware whether
OFAC took any action as a result of this second concern.

The current Plan only provides releases by the Debtors of the
Fiduciary Release Persons, not Estate Professionals. Again,
although automatically preserved at law, the ability to object to
final fee applications of the Estate Professionals, which includes
the ability to include in the objection any alleged Causes of
Action, is made explicit in the current Plan. Further, although
automatically preserved at law and made explicit in Plan section
13.04(2), the current Plan also makes explicit that any Causes of
Action against Estate Professionals are fully preserved. Further,
the relevant bar date language in Plan section 13.04 is identical
to what the Su Parties already agreed to in the Su Parties
Settlement Plan, to remove any final doubt that the language is
appropriate. Finally, the appointment of an independent Plan
Administrator with standing to, among other things, object to final
fee applications and assert potential Preserved Causes of Action
supplements the rights of the Examiner, the US Trustee, and any
other party-in-interest (including the Su Parties) to challenge
Estate Professional Fees.

A copy of the Latest Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb13-33763-2868.pdf

                      About TMT Group

Known in the industry as TMT Group, TMT USA Shipmanagement LLC and
its affiliates own 17 vessels.  Vessels range in size from 27,000
dead weight tons (dwt) to 320,000 dwt.

TMT USA and 22 affiliates, including C. Ladybug Corporation, sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 13-33740) in
Houston, Texas, on June 20, 2013, after lenders seized seven
vessels.

Two of the cases were dismissed on July 23, 2013.  The remaining 21
cases are jointly administered under TMT Procurement Corporation,
Bankruptcy Case Number 13-33763.  

The Debtors are: (1) A Whale Corporation; (2) B Whale Corporation;
(3) C Whale Corporation; (4) D Whale Corporation; (5) E Whale
Corporation; (6) G Whale Corporation; (7) H Whale Corporation; (8)
A Duckling Corporation; (9) F Elephant Inc; (10) A Ladybug
Corporation; (11) C Ladybug Corporation; (12) D Ladybug
Corporation; (13) A Handy Corporation; (14) B Handy Corporation;
(15) C Handy Corporation; (16) B Max Corporation; (17) New Flagship
Investment Co., Ltd; (18) RoRo Line Corporation; (19) Ugly Duckling
Holding Corporation; (20) Great Elephant Corporation; and (21) TMT
Procurement Corporation.

The cases of TMT Shipmanagement LLC, (Case No. 13-33740), and F
Elephant Corporation, (Case No. 13-33749).

TMT filed a lawsuit in U.S. bankruptcy court aimed at forcing
creditors to release the vessels so they can return to generating
income.

Judge Marvin Isgur presides over the case.  TMT tapped attorneys
from Bracewell & Giuliani LLP as bankruptcy counsel, and
AlixPartners as financial advisors.

The U.S. Trustee, in July 2013, appointed an official committee to
represent the interests of all unsecured creditors.  The Committee
consists of China Shipping Car Carrier; Hyundai Samho Heavy
Industries Co., Ltd.; KPI Bridge Oil Limited and KPI Bridge Oil
Singapore Pte Ltd; Omega Bunker S.R.L.; China Ocean Shipping Agency
Shanghai d/b/a Penavico Shanghai; Songa Shipping Pte, Ltd.; and
Universal Marine Service Co., Ltd.  In addition, Scandinavian
Bunkering AS was appointed as an alternate, non-voting member of
the Committee.

The Committee retained Kelley, Drye & Warren LLP as its principal
investigation/litigation counsel, Seward & Kissel LLP as its
principal bankruptcy/restructuring/maritime counsel, and FTI
Consulting as its financial advisor.  The Bankruptcy Court
permitted Seward & Kissel to withdraw as Committee counsel on April
2, 2015.

An Examiner was appointed to review Estate Professional Fees and to
provide a report as to the Non-Debtor Affiliate Avoidance Actions.

                Prior Filed Plans

Handy Debtors -- AHC, BHC, and CHC -- confirmed a joint plan of
reorganization on April 8, 2014.  However, the "effective date"
under the joint plan did not occur and, the plan was terminated,
followed by the sale of the Vessels owned by AHC, BHC, and CHC.

Mr. Su, on July 2, 2014, filed plans of reorganization for BWAC,
GWAC, and HWAC.  The plans could not proceed, however, because the
Vessels owned by BWAC, GWAC and HWAC were sold shortly after the
Plans were filed.

The Debtors, on April 10, 2015, filed two joint plans of
reorganization.  Proceedings on the plans and related disclosure
were postponed and, ultimately, the Debtors withdrew the plan.

As a result of the 2017 Mediation, the Debtors filed the Su Parties
Settlement Plan, which incorporated a settlement in principle among
the Debtors, the Committee, and the Su Parties.  The Debtors and
the Committee, in the exercise of their business judgment and their
fiduciary duties, decided not to pursue the Su Parties Settlement
Plan.


TOURS INCORPORATED: Court Denies Approval of Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------------------
On September 13, 2017, Judge Maureen A. Tighe of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California held a
hearing on approval of Tours Incorporated, Inc.'s Original
Disclosure Statement Describing Original Chapter 11 Plan.

Mark Brenner, counsel for the debtor, and Katherine Bunker, counsel
for the United States Trustee, made appearances.  Based on the
reasons stated in the Court's tentative ruling and on the record
and the objection filed by the United States Trustee to the
Disclosure Statement as to why it fails to contain adequate
information, Judge Tighe ordered that the original disclosure
statement describing the original chapter 11 plan filed by the
Debtor is denied.

               About Tours Incorporated

Tours Incorporated, Inc., based in Canoga Park, CA, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-10256) on January 31,
2017. The Hon. Maureen Tighe presides over the case. Mark E
Brenner, Esq., to serve as bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
both assets and liabilities. The petition was signed by Steve
Burgin, president.


TRUE RELIGION: Hires Cushman & Wakefield as Listing Agent
---------------------------------------------------------
True Religion Apparel, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to employ Cushman & Wakefield of California, Inc., as
listing agent to the Debtors.

True Religion requires Cushman & Wakefield to assist with the
subleasing a portion of the Debtors' headquarters location at 1888
Rosecrans Avenue, Manhattan Beach, California.

Cushman & Wakefield will be paid a commission as follows:

   (i)  6% of the total rental for the first five years or any
        fraction  thereof; and

   (ii) 3% of the total rental for the remaining sublease term.

John Minervini, a real estate agent of Cushman & Wakefield of
California, Inc., assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtors and their estates.

Cushman & Wakefield can be reached at:

     John Minervini
     CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
     601 S. Figueroa St.
     Los Angeles, CA 90017
     Tel: (213) 627-4700
     Fax: (213) 402-8618

                 About True Religion Apparel, Inc.

Manhattan Beach, California-based True Religion Apparel Inc.
designs and markets denim, sportswear and accessories for men,
women and children under the "True Religion" brand. Founded by Jeff
Lubell in 2002, the Company sells its products through wholesale
and retail channels on six continents and through their websites at
http://www.truereligon.com/and http://www.last-stitch.com/ As of
July 5, 2017, the True Religion Brand Jeans retailer had 140 True
Religion and Last Stitch brick-and-mortar stores.

The company has been controlled by TowerBrook Capital Partners
since its take-private transaction in July 2013.

True Religion and four affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-11460) on July 5, 2017, after
obtaining secured stakeholder support for a restructuring that
would reduce debt by over $350 million.

True Religion had $243.3 million in assets against $534.7 million
of liabilities as of Jan. 28, 2017.

The company's legal advisors include Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz
and Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones. Its financial advisor is MAEVA
Group, LLC.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent.

The Ad Hoc Group of Unaffiliated Prepetition First and Second Lien
Lenders -- which signed the RSA -- tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &
Feld LLP as counsel and Moelis & Company, LLP, as financial
advisor.

On July 12, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained
Cooley LLP, as counsel, Province, Inc., as financial advisor.


TUCSON ONE: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Tucson One, LLC
        P.O. Box 5847
        Ventura, CA 93005

Type of Business: Single Asset Real Estate (as defined in 11
                  U.S.C. Section 101(51B))

Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 22, 2017

Case No.: 17-11219

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Arizona (Tucson)

Judge: Hon. Brenda Moody Whinery

Debtor's Counsel: Jeffrey M. Neff, Esq.
                  NEFF & BOYER, P.C.
                  4568 E Camp Lowell Dr
                  Tucson, AZ 85712
                  Tel: 520-722-8030
                  Fax: 520-722-8032
                  E-mail: Jeff@Nefflawaz.com
                         amanda@nefflawaz.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Henry Goldman, trustee, as
member/manager.

A full-text copy of the petition, along with a list four unsecured
creditors, is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb17-11219.pdf


ULTRA PETROLEUM: Must Pay OpCo Noteholders Make-Whole Amount
------------------------------------------------------------
The Ad Hoc Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Ultra Resources,
Inc., filed a complaint against Debtors Ultra Resource, Ultra
Petroleum Corp., and UP Energy Corporation seeking a judgment
declaring: (i) that the Debtors' filing for chapter 11 bankruptcy
triggered an obligation under the terms of a Master Note Purchase
Agreement to pay a Make-Whole Amount to certain noteholders of
OpCo; and (ii) the amount of that obligation. The Debtors objected
to the Senior Creditor Committee's claim for the Make-Whole Amount,
post-petition interest at the contract default rate, and other
related fees and expenses.

Judge Marvin Isgur of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas denied the Debtors' objection.

Judge Isgur finds that the Debtors fail to rebut the Noteholders'
claim for the Make-Whole Amount because they fail to prove that the
damages resulting from prepayment were readily ascertainable at the
time the parties entered into the Note Agreement or that they were
conspicuously disproportionate to foreseeable damage amounts. The
Debtors put forward no evidence or argument claiming that the
prepayment damages were easily calculable as of the time the Note
Agreement was finalized. The difficulty in forecasting damages, in
this case, is consistent with the difficulty seen in other cases
when quantifying damages under long-term debt instruments and
contrasts sharply with cases in which damages could easily have
been calculated at the time an agreement was created.

The Debtors also fail to rebut the Noteholders' claim for the
Make-Whole Amount by unsuccessfully proving that the Make-Whole
Amount is conspicuously disproportionate to the foreseeable losses
at the time the parties entered into the Note Agreement.

Further, the Debtors fail to rebut the Noteholders' claim for
post-petition interest at the rate listed in the Note Agreement
because the Noteholders' claims are treated as unimpaired under the
Debtors' chapter 11 plan. Paying post-petition interest on the
Make-Whole Amount at the federal judgment rate instead of the rate
within the Note Agreement would cause the Noteholders to be
impaired. The Noteholders are therefore entitled to their
contractual rate of interest under the Note Agreement regardless of
any disallowance provisions in the Bankruptcy Code.

A full-text copy of Judge Isgur's Memorandum Opinion dated Sept.
21, 2017, is available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb16-32202-1569.pdf

                     About Ultra Petroleum

Houston, Texas-based Ultra Petroleum Corp. is an independent oil
and gas company engaged in the  development, production, operation,
exploration and acquisition of oil and natural gas properties.

On April 29, 2016, Ultra Petroleum Corp. and seven subsidiary
companies filed petitions (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) seeking relief under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.  The Debtors'
cases have been assigned to Judge Marvin Isgur.  These cases are
being jointly administered for procedural purposes, with all
pleadings filed in these cases will be maintained on the case
docket for Ultra Petroleum Corp. Case No. 16-32202.

Ultra Petroleum disclosed total assets of $1.28 billion and total
liabilities of $3.91 billion as of March 31, 2016.

James H.M. Sprayregen, P.C., David R. Seligman, P.C., Michael B.
Slade, Esq., Christopher T. Greco, Esq., and Gregory F. Pesce,
Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP; and Patricia B. Tomasco, Esq.,
Matthew D. Cavenaugh, Esq., and Jennifer F. Wertz, Esq., at Jackson
Walker, L.L.P., serve as co-counsel to the Debtors.  

Rothschild Inc. serves as the Debtors' investment banker; Petrie
Partners serves as their investment banker; and Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions, LLC, serves as claims and noticing agent.

On May 5, 2016, the United States Trustee for the Southern District
of Texas appointed an official committee for unsecured creditors of
all of the Debtors.  On September 26, 2016, the United States
Trustee for the Southern District of Texas filed a Notice of
Reconstitution of the UCC.  The Committee tapped Weil, Gotshal &
Manges LLP as its legal counsel; Opportune LLP as advisor; and PJT
Partners LP as its financial advisor.  

Certain other stakeholders have organized for purposes of
participating in the Debtors' chapter 11 cases: (i) on June 8,
2016, an informal ad hoc committee of unsecured creditors of
subsidiary, Ultra Resources, notified the Bankruptcy Court it had
formed and identified its members, most of which are distressed
debt investors and/or hedge funds; (ii) on June 13, 2016, an
informal ad hoc committee of the holders of senior notes issued by
the Company notified the Bankruptcy Court it had formed and
identified its members; (iii) on July 20, 2016, an informal ad hoc
committee of shareholders of the Company notified the Bankruptcy
Court it had formed and identified its members; and (iv) on January
6, 2017, an informal ad hoc committee of unsecured creditors of
subsidiary, Ultra Resources, notified the Bankruptcy Court it had
formed and identified its members, most of which are insurance
companies.

In April 2017, Ultra Petroleum successfully completed its Chapter
11 restructuring.


UNITED CHARTER: Can Use Cash Collateral Through Oct. 31
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Ronald H. Sargis the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of California authorized United Charter, LLC, to use cash
collateral to pay for the expenses set forth in the Budget for the
period June 1, 2017, through October 31, 2017.

The monthly total budget provides total expenses of $7,785.

The Creditors having an interest in the cash collateral are given
replacement liens in the post-petition proceeds in the same
priority, validity, and extent as they existed in the cash
collateral expended, to the extent that the use of cash collateral
resulted in a reduction of a Creditor's secured claim.

The hearing on the Motion is continued to Oct. 5, 2017 at 10:30
a.m., to consider a Supplement to the Motion to extend the
authorization to use cash collateral.  The Debtor is directed to
file and serve supplemental pleadings as well as notice of the Oct.
5 hearing, on or before, Sept. 21, 2017.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated Sept. 6, 2017, is available at
https://is.gd/9Oakol

                      About United Charter

United Charter LLC, owner of certain properties in Stockton,
California, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No.
17-22347) on April 7, 2017.  The petition was signed by Raymond
Zhang, managing member.  The case is assigned to Judge Ronald H.
Sargis.  The Debtor is represented by Jeffrey J. Goodrich, Esq., at
Goodrich & Associates.  The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities
ranging from $1 million to $10 million.


UPLIFT RX: Hires Kimball Legal as Special Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
Uplift Rx, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to employ
Kimball Legal, PLLC, as special counsel to the Debtors.

Uplift Rx requires Kimball Legal to:

   a. assist the Debtors and Chapter 11 counsel in all dealings,
      including discussions, with any administrative or
      regulatory agencies in Utah, including the issue with
      the State of Utah Department of Commerce Division of
      Occupational and Professional Licensing; and

   b. advise the Debtors and Chapter 11 counsel of duties
      concerning applicable healthcare laws, regulations,
      and related issues concerning the Debtors' pharmacies
      in Utah.

Kimball Legal will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Shareholders                      $300
     Associates/Of Counsel             $190-$240
     Paralegals                        $105-$130

Kimball Legal will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

William J. Stilling, a partner of Kimball Legal, PLLC, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Kimball Legal can be reached at:

     William J. Stilling, Esq.
     KIMBALL LEGAL, PLLC
     2940 W Maple Loop Drive
     Lehi, UT 84043
     Tel: (801) 922-0222

                   About Uplift RX, LLC

Uplift Rx, LLC is a Texas Limited Liability Company formed in June
2016. It operates pharmacy located in Houston, Texas. Uplift Rx,
along with other affiliated entities together make up the Alliance
Healthcare family, a group of privately held companies
headquartered in South Jordan, Utah. The Alliance network consists
of 20 pharmacies across the country, including three pharmacies in
Texas. Since 2006, the Alliance Healthcare companies have been
working to improve the well-being of those with chronic health
conditions such as diabetes.

Uplift Rx, LLC and its debtor affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
17-32186) on April 7 and 8, 2017. The petitions were signed by
Jeffrey C. Smith, chief executive officer.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors estimated assets of less
than $1 million and liabilities of $50 million to $100 million.

The cases are assigned to Judge Marvin Isgur. The Debtors tapped
Baker & Hostetler LLP as legal counsel.

Following the appointment of Ronald L. Glass as the Chapter 11
Trustee, BakerHostetler LLP, was retained as the trustee's
attorney.

On May 3, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Fox Rothschild
represents the committee as bankruptcy counsel.


VALLEY PETROLEUM: Seeks Permission to Use Cash Until January 2018
-----------------------------------------------------------------
5208VPN, LLC, and Valley Petroleum, LLC, seek for final authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Wisconsin to use the cash collateral of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and
CAP Services, Inc., through Jan. 31, 2018.

Valley Petroleum, generates cash collateral from the sale of
gasoline fuel and inventory from the convenience store, while
5208VPN receives rent from Valley Petroleum. In order to sustain
their operations, the Debtors must use cash collateral to pay
expenses of operations, including adequate protection payments to
secured parties.

As of Aug. 21, 2017, the Debtors are indebted to Wells Fargo in the
amount of approximately $1,220,453 and to CAP Services in the
amount of approximately $174,000.

Wells Fargo possesses a first priority recorded mortgage on the
real estate of 5208VPN and a general business security interest in
substantially all assets of Valley Petroleum.

CAP Services possesses a junior priority recorded mortgage on the
real estate of 5208VPN and a perfected general business security
interest in substantially all assets of Valley Petroleum.

The Debtors propose to provide Wells Fargo and CAP Services as
adequate protection of their interests:

     (1) payments of $5,300 per month to Wells Fargo and $2,900 per
month to CAP Services, payable to Wells Fargo on or before the 1st
of each month and to CAP Services on or before the 21st of each
month;

     (2) a tax escrow payment of $1,100 per month to Wells Fargo,
payable at the same time as its adequate protection payment;

     (3) a continuation of adequate insurance coverage; and

     (4) replacement liens on the Debtors' post-petition assets,
excluding claims pursuant to the Code, to the extent Wells Fargo
and CAP Services had valid, perfected, and non-avoidable
prepetition liens in prepetition assets of the same class, to the
extent of the value of Wells Fargo's and CAP Services' interests in
such assets as of the Petition Date.

                      About Valley Petroleum

Based in Appleton, Wisconsin, Valley Petroleum operates a small gas
station at the real estate owned by 5208VPN, LLC, which is located
at 5208 North Richmond Street, Appleton, Wisconsin.

Valley Petroleum and debtor affiliate, 5208VPN, LLC, sought Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Wisc. Case Nos. 17-28113 and 17-28112)
on Aug. 17, 2017.  The petitions were signed by Steve A. Rosek,
member.  The Debtors have requested for the joint administration of
their cases.

The Debtors are represented by Leonard G. Leverson, Esq., at
Leverson Lucey & Metz S.C.  

5208VPN, LLC, estimated $1,000 to $10,000 in assets and $1,000 to
$10,000 in liabilities; and Valley Petroleum estimated $100 to $500
in assets and $1,000 to $10,000 in liabilities.


VELA'S 4 STARS: Hires Nai Rio Grande as Real Estate Broker
----------------------------------------------------------
Vela's 4 Stars, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Texas to employ Nai Rio Grande Valley,
as real estate broker to the Debtor.

Vela's 4 Stars requires Nai Rio Grande to list, market, and sell
the Debtor's commercial property located on 2603 E. Expressway 83,
Donna, Texas.

Nai Rio Grande will be paid a commission of 6% of the sales price.

Laura Liza Paz, member of Nai Rio Grande Valley, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Nai Rio Grande can be reached at:

     Laura Liza Paz
     NAI RIO GRANDE VALLEY
     1400 McColl Stret, Suite 104B
     McAllen, TX 78501
     Tel: (956) 994-8900
     Fax: (956) 994-8902
     E-mail: laurap@nairgv.com

                   About Vela's 4 Stars, LLC

Vela's 4 Stars LLC, a company based in Donna, Texas, was created to
own and manage real property assets. The properties have an
aggregate current value of $3.54 million.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 17-70282) on July 31, 2017. Juan
R. Vela, president, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $3.54 million in
assets and $2.53 million in liabilities.

Judge Eduardo V. Rodriguez presides over the case.


VENOCO LLC: Allowed to File Chapter 11 Plan Until December 13
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Kevin Gross of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware extended the exclusive periods during which only
Venoco, LLC and its affiliated debtors have the right to (a) file a
chapter 11 plan through and including December 13, 2017, and (b)
solicit acceptances of the plan through and including February 13,
2018.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on August 15, 2017,
the Debtors requested exclusivity extension to (a) pursue
additional strategic transactions, (b) complete review of their
executory contracts and unexpired leases, (c) review and prosecute
claims filed against the Debtors after the bar date has passed, and
(d) engage in discussions with their key constituents regarding the
parameters of a chapter 11 plan or plans.

The Debtors told the Court that they have been focused on typical
chapter 11 responsibilities while simultaneously pursuing
value-creation measures, and that they have not yet had the
opportunity to demonstrate their ability to file a viable chapter
11 plan or plans.

These Cases involve six Debtors with significant assets and
liabilities and hundreds of unsecured creditors. Further, the
Debtors have been operating their business in a very stagnant and
unprofitable E&P environment. Ultimately, this E&P environment,
among other factors, has necessitated the Debtors' orderly wind
down, which involves the complex task of disposing of, by sale or
other means, all of the Debtors' assets.

The Debtors claimed that there are still unresolved contingencies
in these Cases which prevented them from filing plans and
disclosure statements. For instance, the sale of the SCU Assets is
underway, but not completed, and the Debtors have not yet disposed
of their interests in some of their pipelines.

In addition, the bar date has not passed in these Cases, so the
Debtors cannot be certain they have accounted for all of the claims
that may exist against the estates.

Moreover, the Beverly Hills adversary proceeding is in the
appellate stages pending mediation, which is to take place on
October 25, 2017, and thus constitutes another key unresolved issue
in these Cases.

                      About Venoco

Venoco LLC and six of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-10828) on April 17, 2017.  The cases have
been assigned to Judge Kevin Gross.

As of the Petition Date (and following the quitclaim of the SEF
Leases), the Debtors held interests in approximately 57,859 net
acres, of which approximately 40,945 are developed. The majority of
the Debtors' revenues are derived through sales of oil to competing
buyers, including large oil refining companies and independent
marketers.  Nearly all of the Debtors' annual revenues are
generated from sales to one purchaser, Tesoro.  The Debtors'
revenues from oil and gas sales were approximately $33.6 million on
a rolling 12 month basis.

As of the bankruptcy filing, the Debtors listed assets in the range
of $10 million to $50 million and liabilities of up to $100
million.  As of the petition date, the Debtors have approximately
$25 million in cash, all of which is unrestricted. The Debtors
anticipate that they will need all or substantially all of this
cash to fund ongoing operational expenses, fund these cases and a
sale process, and wind down their affairs.

The Debtors tapped Bracewell LLP as legal counsel; Morris, Nichols,
Arsht & Tunnell LLP as co-counsel; Seaport Global Securities LLC as
investment banker; and Prime Clerk LLC as claims, noticing and
balloting agent.  Zolfo Cooper Management, LLC, and its senior
director Bret Fernandes will lead the Debtors' restructuring
efforts.

The Debtors hired Natural Resources Group, Inc., a real estate
broker, in connection with the sale of its 252-acre real property
known as Lang Tule located in Solano County, California.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtors' cases.


W&T OFFSHORE: Will Hold 'Say-on-Pay' Votes Triennially
------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors of W&T Offshore, Inc. has determined to
hold future say-on-pay votes every three years.  At the annual
meeting of shareholders held on May 3, 2017, 53,767,662 shares
voted for every year, 206,038 shares voted for every two years,
46,291,550 shares voted for every three years, and 131,818 shares
abstained.

                      About W&T Offshore

Based in Houston, Texas, W&T Offshore, Inc., is an independent oil
and natural gas producer, active in the exploration, development
and acquisition of oil and natural gas properties in the Gulf of
Mexico.  In October 2015, the Company disposed of substantially all
of its onshore oil and natural gas interests with the sale of its
Yellow Rose field in the Permian Basin.  The Company retained an
overriding royalty interest in the Yellow Rose field production.
W&T Offshore, Inc. is a Texas corporation originally organized as a
Nevada corporation in 1988, and successor by merger to W&T Oil
Properties, Inc., a Louisiana corporation organized in 1983.  The
Company's interest in fields, leases, structures and equipment are
primarily owned by the parent company, W&T Offshore, Inc. and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, W & T Energy VI, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company.

W&T Offshore reported a net loss of $249.0 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2016, a net loss of $1.04 billion for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2015, and a net loss of $11.66 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2014.

The Company's balance sheet at June 30, 2017, showed $874.97
million in total assets, $1.47 billion in total liabilities, and a
total stockholders' deficit of $597.95 million.

                         *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on April 14, 2017, S&P Global Ratings
affirmed its 'CCC' corporate credit rating on U.S.-based oil and
gas exploration and production (E&P) company W&T Offshore Inc.  The
rating outlook is negative.  "The affirmations follow our review of
W&T's capital structure and credit profile in light of challenging
conditions in the offshore E&P industry," said S&P Global Ratings
credit analyst Kevin Kwok.


WASHINGTON MUTUAL: M. Sutton Suit Dismissed for Lack of Service
---------------------------------------------------------------
WMI Liquidating Trust filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and
to Transfer Venue in the adversary proceeding captioned MARK J.
SUTTON, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., WASHINGTON
MUTUAL, INC., AND CHARLES H. BILLINGHAM, SHERIFF OF CAMDEN,
Defendants, Adv. No. 16-51043 (MFW) (D.Del.).

In its Motion, the Liquidating Trust seeks to dismiss the Complaint
for lack of service and failure to state a claim for relief and to
transfer venue to the jurisdiction where the Plaintiff's individual
bankruptcy case is pending.

Judge Mary F. Walrath grants the motion to dismiss because the
Liquidating Trust has satisfied its burden. Although the Motion to
Transfer Venue is thereby moot, the Court will sua sponte transfer
venue as to the remaining defendants named in the Complaint because
it does not affect the administration of this case.

The Liquidating Trust asserts that the Plaintiff's failure to serve
a copy of the Complaint and Summons and Notice within 90 days
warrants the Complaint's dismissal. Although the Liquidating Trust
acknowledges that it attended the pretrial hearing in November, it
contends that it only did so because it obtained a copy of the
transcript from the October hearing. The Liquidating Trust argues
that its attendance did not cure the jurisdictional defect.

The Plaintiff argues that the mere fact that the Liquidating Trust
attended the hearing establishes that the Debtor and other
defendants were properly served. The Plaintiff notes that the
docket shows an entry on Nov. 30, 2016, for a Summons and Notice of
the pretrial hearing, which attaches his Certificate of Service of
the same.

The Court finds that the Plaintiff did not properly serve the
Complaint and Summons and Notice on the Debtor or the Liquidating
Trust. The Certificate of Service of the Summons and Notice does
not show any service on the Debtor or the Liquidating Trust. Nor
does that reflect that any defendant in the adversary proceeding
was served; in fact, none of the entities identified on the
Certificate of Service are named as defendants in the Complaint.
The Court, therefore, grants the Liquidating Trust's Motion to
Dismiss for lack of service.

The Court also finds that the Complaint does not state a claim for
relief against the Debtor, or the Liquidating Trust, as successor
in interest to the Debtor. Taking the facts in the Complaint as
true, the Plaintiff asserts that the note for its mortgage was
executed with WaMu Home Loans, a WaMu Bank subsidiary. The
Plaintiff has failed to set forth any facts in the Complaint to
show that the corporate form of WaMu Home Loans or WaMu Bank should
be ignored. Further, JPMorgan, not the Debtor, is currently, and
was at the time of the alleged improper acts relating to the
Plaintiff's eviction, the holding company of WaMu Bank and
indirectly of WaMu Home Loans. Therefore, the Court will dismiss
the Complaint for failure to state a cause of action against the
Debtor or the Liquidating Trust.

Finally, the Court finds that justice, fairness, and convenience of
the parties all weigh in favor of transferring venue of the
Complaint for the remaining defendants to the Bankruptcy Court in
New Jersey where the Plaintiff's chapter 13 case is pending. The
Complaint will have no effect on the administration of the Debtor's
bankruptcy case in Delaware because it has been dismissed as to the
Debtor.

The bankruptcy case is In re: WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., et al.,
Chapter 11, Debtors. MARK J. SUTTON, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE
BANK, N.A., WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., AND CHARLES H. BILLINGHAM,
SHERIFF OF CAMDEN, Defendants, Case No. 08-12229 (MFW) (D.Del.).

A full-text copy of Judge Walrath's Memorandum Opinion dated Sept.
19, 2017, is available at https://is.gd/IrbpBH from Leagle.com.

Washington Mutual, Inc., Defendant, represented by Marcos Alexis
Ramos -- ramos@rlf.com -- Richards Layton & Finger, PA & Amanda R.
Steele -- steele@rlf.com -- Richards, Layton and Finger.

                About Washington Mutual

Based in Seattle, Washington, Washington Mutual Inc. --
http://www.wamu.com/-- was the holding company for Washington
Mutual Bank as well as numerous non-bank subsidiaries.

Washington Mutual Bank was taken over on Sept. 25, 2008, by U.S.
government regulators.  The next day, WaMu and its affiliate, WMI
Investment Corp., filed separate petitions for Chapter 11 relief
(Bankr. D. Del. 08-12229 and 08-12228, respectively).  WaMu owned
100% of the equity in WMI Investment.

When WaMu filed for protection from its creditors, it disclosed
assets of $32,896,605,516 and debts of $8,167,022,695.  WMI
Investment estimated assets of $500 million to $1 billion with zero
debts.

WaMu was represented in the Chapter 11 case by Brian Rosen, Esq.,
at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP in New York City; Mark D. Collins,
Esq., at Richards, Layton & Finger P.A. in Wilmington, Del.; and
Peter Calamari, Esq., and David Elsberg, Esq., at Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP.  The Debtor tapped Valuation
Research Corporation as valuation service provider for certain
assets.

Fred S. Hodara, Esq., at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Fled LLP in New
York, and David B. Stratton, Esq., at Pepper Hamilton LLP in
Wilmington, Del., represented the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors. Stephen D. Susman, Esq., at Susman Godfrey LLP and
William P. Bowden, Esq., at Ashby & Geddes, P.A., represented the
Equity Committee.  The official committee of equity security
holders also tapped BDO USA as its tax advisor.  Stacey R.
Friedman, Esq., at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Adam G. Landis,
Esq., at Landis Rath & Cobb LLP in Wilmington, Del., represented
JPMorgan Chase, which acquired the WaMu bank unit's assets prior to
the Petition Date.

Records filed Jan. 24, 2012, say that Washington Mutual Inc.,
former owner of the biggest U.S. bank to fail, has spent $232.8
million on bankruptcy professionals since filing its Chapter 11
case in September 2008.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on March 21, 2012, the
Debtors disclosed that their Seventh Amended Joint Plan of
Affiliated Debtors, as modified, and as confirmed by order, dated
Feb. 23, 2012, became effective, marking the successful completion
of the Chapter 11 restructuring process.


WESTERN ENERGY: Moody's Withdraws 'Caa1' Corp. Family Rating
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has withdrawn all the ratings of Western
Energy Services Corp. (Western), including the company's Caa1
Corporate Family Rating, the Caa1-PD Probability of Default Rating,
Caa2 senior unsecured notes rating, SGL-3 Speculative Grade
Liquidity Rating and its stable outlook.

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Western Energy Services Corp.

-- Outlook, Changed To Rating Withdrawn From Stable

Withdrawals:

Issuer: Western Energy Services Corp.

-- Probability of Default Rating, Withdrawn , previously rated
    Caa1-PD

-- Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Withdrawn , previously
    rated SGL-3

-- Corporate Family Rating, Withdrawn , previously rated Caa1

-- Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture , Withdrawn ,
    previously rated Caa2(LGD4)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's has withdrawn the ratings for its own business reasons.

Western Energy Services, based in Calgary, Alberta, provides land
contract drilling to North American exploration and production
companies and also has Canadian based well servicing and rental
equipment businesses.


WILLIAM J. KARDASH: IRS Granted $4.3-Mil. Gen. Unsecured Claim
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge K. Rodney May of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida issued an order granting Debtor William J.
Kardash, Sr.'s motion for summary judgment and sustaining his
objection to claim.

The parties have filed competing motions for summary judgment on
the Debtor's objection to the proof of claim filed by the United
States of America on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service. The
United States asserts that the Debtor's liability from a Tax Court
judgment, for his having received about $4.3 million of fraudulent
transfers from the corporate taxpayer, is equivalent to a "tax"
and, therefore, the claim is entitled to priority as a tax pursuant
to 11 U.S.C. section 507(a)(8)(iii). The Debtor argues that the
liability arose under state fraudulent transfer law and should have
the status of a general unsecured claim.

The Court finds that the Debtor's liability arises solely under
FUFTA and is not a financial burden for the purpose of supporting
the Government. Under FUFTA, any creditor whose collection of
unpaid debt is frustrated by a fraudulent transfer could seek the
same recovery that the United States obtained in the Tax Court. If
another creditor had pursued the Debtor for recovery of the
dividends as fraudulent transfers, his liability would extend to
that party, as well. If the Florida Engineered Construction
Products Corporation had become a debtor in bankruptcy, the FUFTA
claim would have become an asset of the bankruptcy estate.

The obligation is also determined by the transferor's capital
structure and the timing of the transfer: if the dividends had been
paid when FECP was solvent Debtor would have no liability,
regardless of whether FECP's taxes remained unpaid. In this case,
section 6901(a) provides a collection procedure to recover a debt
arising under state law. It does not establish a tax owed
exclusively to the United States.

Section 507(a)(8) applies only to taxes "on or measured by income
or gross receipts." But, transferee liability is measured by the
value or amount of property transferred, not income of the
taxpayer-transferor. The Debtor was never liable for the $120
million of taxes that FECP owed (an amount measured by the income
of FECP). His liability is limited to the dividends that the Tax
Court considered to be constructively fraudulent transfers under
Florida law.

The Bankruptcy Code is premised on equal distribution among
creditors unless the contrary is clearly stated. Accordingly, the
unsecured claims that are given priority under the Bankruptcy Code
are to be narrowly construed. The burden of proof to establish
priority, in this case, falls on the United States.

The Court, thus, grants the Debtor's motion and denies the US'
motion. The Debtor's Objection to Claim No. 2 is sustained and the
unsecured portion of the United States' claim is denied priority
status in this bankruptcy case and shall be allowed as a general
unsecured claim in the amount of $4,365,810.94.

A full-text copy of Judge May's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated
Sept. 21, 2017, is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb8-16-05715-136.pdf

William J. Kardash, Sr., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 16-05715) on July 1, 2016.  Alberto F.
Gomez, Jr., Esq., at Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns, LLP, serves
as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


WOMEN'S HEALTH: May Use Cash Collateral Until Oct. 12
-----------------------------------------------------
The Hon. James P. Smith of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Georgia has entered a fourth interim order authorizing
The Women's Health Institute of Macon, PC, to use cash collateral
until Oct. 12, 2017.

A final hearing on the Debtor's request to continue using cash
collateral will be held on Oct. 12, 2017, at 11:45 a.m.

As adequate protection for any diminution in the value of Branch
Banking and Trust Company's interest in the cash collateral or the
personal property, including any diminution resulting from the use
of cash collateral on or after the Petition Date, BB&T is granted
valid, binding, enforceable, and automatically perfected liens on
and security interests in the personal property, wherever located
and whether created, acquired or arising prior to, on, or after the
Petition Date.

The Debtor will make interest payments to BB&T in the amounts as
calculated, and as and when the payments are due, under the loan
documents.

A copy of the Order is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/gamb17-51196-59.pdf

                       About Women's Health

Haremu Holdings, LLC, The Women's Health Institute of Macon, PC,
and ELO Outpatient Surgery Center, LLC, filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case Nos. 17-51195, 17-51196 and
17-51197) on June 5, 2017.  The cases are assigned to Judge James
P. Smith.  The cases are not jointly administered.

The petitions were signed by Emeka Umerah, managing member.

Women's Health Institute of Macon PC is a group practice with one
location specializing in family medicine and Obstetrics and
Gynecology.  ELO Outpatient Surgery Center provides ambulatory
surgical services.  Emeka Umerah is the managing member for each
entity.

At the time of filing, Haremu disclosed $1 million to $10 million
in assets and liabilities; Women's Health disclosed $1 million to
$10 million in assets and $500,000 to $1 million in liabilities;
and ELO Outpatient disclosed $100,000 to $500,000 in assets and
liabilities.

The Debtors are represented by Wesley J. Boyer, Esq., at Boyer Law
Firm, L.L.C., in Macon, Georgia.


[^] Large Companies with Insolvent Balance Sheet
------------------------------------------------
                                                Total
                                               Share-      Total
                                   Total     Holders'    Working
                                  Assets       Equity    Capital
  Company         Ticker            ($MM)        ($MM)      ($MM)
  -------         ------          ------     --------    -------
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ALSWF US          98.3        (53.7)     (31.2)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  OU1 GR            98.3        (53.7)     (31.2)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ABT CN            98.3        (53.7)     (31.2)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ABT2EUR EU        98.3        (53.7)     (31.2)
ACELRX PHARMA     ACRX US           78.2        (31.6)      53.2
AGENUS INC        AJ81 GR          176.5        (17.5)      77.8
AGENUS INC        AGEN US          176.5        (17.5)      77.8
AGENUS INC        AJ81 TH          176.5        (17.5)      77.8
AGENUS INC        AGENEUR EU       176.5        (17.5)      77.8
AGENUS INC        AJ81 QT          176.5        (17.5)      77.8
AKCEA THERAPEUTI  AKCA US          124.1        (83.0)      53.6
AKCEA THERAPEUTI  1KA GR           124.1        (83.0)      53.6
AKCEA THERAPEUTI  AKCAEUR EU       124.1        (83.0)      53.6
AKCEA THERAPEUTI  1KA TH           124.1        (83.0)      53.6
AKCEA THERAPEUTI  1KA QT           124.1        (83.0)      53.6
AMER RESTAUR-LP   ICTPU US          33.5         (4.0)      (6.2)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AZPN US          247.9       (260.8)    (321.1)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AST GR           247.9       (260.8)    (321.1)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AST TH           247.9       (260.8)    (321.1)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AZPNEUR EU       247.9       (260.8)    (321.1)
AUTOZONE INC      AZO US         9,028.3     (1,714.2)    (286.3)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 TH         9,028.3     (1,714.2)    (286.3)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 GR         9,028.3     (1,714.2)    (286.3)
AUTOZONE INC      AZOEUR EU      9,028.3     (1,714.2)    (286.3)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 QT         9,028.3     (1,714.2)    (286.3)
AVEO PHARMACEUTI  VPA GR            42.5        (19.3)      27.2
AVEO PHARMACEUTI  AVEO US           42.5        (19.3)      27.2
AVEO PHARMACEUTI  VPA TH            42.5        (19.3)      27.2
AVEO PHARMACEUTI  VPA QT            42.5        (19.3)      27.2
AVEO PHARMACEUTI  AVEOEUR EU        42.5        (19.3)      27.2
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVID US          224.7       (274.8)     (85.5)
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVD GR           224.7       (274.8)     (85.5)
AXIM BIOTECHNOLO  AXIM US            4.4         (3.4)      (0.6)
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BNFT US          173.0        (35.1)       9.6
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BTF GR           173.0        (35.1)       9.6
BLUE BIRD CORP    BLBD US          366.8        (59.6)      32.8
BLUE RIDGE MOUNT  BRMR US        1,060.2       (212.5)     (62.4)
BOEING CO-BDR     BOEI34 BZ     90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO-CED     BA AR         90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA EU         90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO/THE     BCO GR        90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO/THE     BAEUR EU      90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA TE         90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA* MM        90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA SW         90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO/THE     BACHF EU      90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO/THE     BOEI NA       90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA US         90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO/THE     BCO TH        90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA CI         90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO/THE     BCO QT        90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO/THE     BAUSD SW      90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA AV         90,036.0     (1,978.0)   9,922.0
BOMBARDIER INC-B  BBDBN MM      23,395.0     (3,825.0)     576.0
BOMBARDIER-B OLD  BBDYB BB      23,395.0     (3,825.0)     576.0
BOMBARDIER-B W/I  BBD/W CN      23,395.0     (3,825.0)     576.0
BRINKER INTL      EAT US         1,413.7       (493.7)    (292.0)
BRINKER INTL      BKJ GR         1,413.7       (493.7)    (292.0)
BRINKER INTL      EAT2EUR EU     1,413.7       (493.7)    (292.0)
BROOKFIELD REAL   BRE CN            97.0        (32.9)       3.2
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  DOO CN         2,252.0        (93.4)     (42.8)
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  B15A GR        2,252.0        (93.4)     (42.8)
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  BRPIF US       2,252.0        (93.4)     (42.8)
BUFFALO COAL COR  BUC SJ            50.2        (21.9)     (22.2)
BURLINGTON STORE  BURL US        2,611.8        (95.9)      25.2
BURLINGTON STORE  BUI GR         2,611.8        (95.9)      25.2
BURLINGTON STORE  BURL* MM       2,611.8        (95.9)      25.2
CADIZ INC         CDZI US           72.2        (70.7)      12.2
CADIZ INC         2ZC GR            72.2        (70.7)      12.2
CAESARS ENTERTAI  CZR US        14,793.0     (3,357.0)  (4,630.0)
CAESARS ENTERTAI  C08 GR        14,793.0     (3,357.0)  (4,630.0)
CAESARS ENTERTAI  CZREUR EU     14,793.0     (3,357.0)  (4,630.0)
CALIFORNIA RESOU  CRC US         6,154.0       (491.0)    (220.0)
CALIFORNIA RESOU  1CLB GR        6,154.0       (491.0)    (220.0)
CALIFORNIA RESOU  CRCEUR EU      6,154.0       (491.0)    (220.0)
CALIFORNIA RESOU  1CL TH         6,154.0       (491.0)    (220.0)
CALIFORNIA RESOU  1CLB QT        6,154.0       (491.0)    (220.0)
CAMBIUM LEARNING  ABCD US          126.5        (52.1)     (63.7)
CASELLA WASTE     WA3 GR           588.9        (74.6)       4.6
CASELLA WASTE     CWST US          588.9        (74.6)       4.6
CASELLA WASTE     WA3 TH           588.9        (74.6)       4.6
CASELLA WASTE     CWSTEUR EU       588.9        (74.6)       4.6
CDK GLOBAL INC    CDK US         2,883.1        (56.8)     726.2
CDK GLOBAL INC    C2G TH         2,883.1        (56.8)     726.2
CDK GLOBAL INC    CDKEUR EU      2,883.1        (56.8)     726.2
CDK GLOBAL INC    C2G GR         2,883.1        (56.8)     726.2
CEDAR FAIR LP     FUN US         2,109.5        (60.6)     (92.5)
CEDAR FAIR LP     7CF GR         2,109.5        (60.6)     (92.5)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CHK US        11,920.0       (684.0)    (911.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CS1 GR        11,920.0       (684.0)    (911.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CS1 TH        11,920.0       (684.0)    (911.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CHK* MM       11,920.0       (684.0)    (911.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CS1 QT        11,920.0       (684.0)    (911.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CHKEUR EU     11,920.0       (684.0)    (911.0)
CHOICE HOTELS     CZH GR           948.0       (252.6)     103.9
CHOICE HOTELS     CHH US           948.0       (252.6)     103.9
CINCINNATI BELL   CBB US         1,481.7       (124.0)      11.4
CINCINNATI BELL   CIB1 GR        1,481.7       (124.0)      11.4
CINCINNATI BELL   CBBEUR EU      1,481.7       (124.0)      11.4
CLEAR CHANNEL-A   C7C GR         5,416.6     (1,216.5)     327.9
CLEAR CHANNEL-A   CCO US         5,416.6     (1,216.5)     327.9
CLEMENTIA PHARMA  CMTA US           40.0       (212.6)      32.1
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CVA GR         2,030.1       (666.7)     495.0
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CVA TH         2,030.1       (666.7)     495.0
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CLF US         2,030.1       (666.7)     495.0
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CLF* MM        2,030.1       (666.7)     495.0
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CLF2EUR EU     2,030.1       (666.7)     495.0
COGENT COMMUNICA  CCOI US          732.4        (71.2)     240.8
COGENT COMMUNICA  OGM1 GR          732.4        (71.2)     240.8
DELEK LOGISTICS   DKL US           415.5        (21.1)      14.0
DELEK LOGISTICS   D6L GR           415.5        (21.1)      14.0
DENNY'S CORP      DE8 GR           306.9        (79.9)     (53.3)
DENNY'S CORP      DENN US          306.9        (79.9)     (53.3)
DOLLARAMA INC     DOL CN         1,891.4        (59.4)     291.2
DOLLARAMA INC     DLMAF US       1,891.4        (59.4)     291.2
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 GR         1,891.4        (59.4)     291.2
DOLLARAMA INC     DOLEUR EU      1,891.4        (59.4)     291.2
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 TH         1,891.4        (59.4)     291.2
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV TH           781.8     (1,803.1)     209.4
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV GR           781.8     (1,803.1)     209.4
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZ US           781.8     (1,803.1)     209.4
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV QT           781.8     (1,803.1)     209.4
DOVA PHARMACEUTI  DOVA US           26.4         (3.5)      (5.1)
DOVA PHARMACEUTI  0AV GR            26.4         (3.5)      (5.1)
DOVA PHARMACEUTI  DOVAEUR EU        26.4         (3.5)      (5.1)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DB5 GR         2,253.7       (913.3)     (96.4)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DB5 TH         2,253.7       (913.3)     (96.4)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DNB US         2,253.7       (913.3)     (96.4)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DNB1EUR EU     2,253.7       (913.3)     (96.4)
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB GR         3,147.9       (185.4)     147.6
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  DNKN US        3,147.9       (185.4)     147.6
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB TH         3,147.9       (185.4)     147.6
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB QT         3,147.9       (185.4)     147.6
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  DNKNEUR EU     3,147.9       (185.4)     147.6
ERIN ENERGY CORP  ERN SJ           190.9       (349.2)    (280.7)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  EVRI US        1,337.4       (123.9)      16.4
EVERI HOLDINGS I  G2C TH         1,337.4       (123.9)      16.4
EVERI HOLDINGS I  G2C GR         1,337.4       (123.9)      16.4
EVERI HOLDINGS I  EVRIEUR EU     1,337.4       (123.9)      16.4
FERRELLGAS-LP     FEG GR         1,679.3       (703.5)     (26.2)
FERRELLGAS-LP     FGP US         1,679.3       (703.5)     (26.2)
FIFTH STREET ASS  FSAM US          189.2         (8.9)       -
FIFTH STREET ASS  7FS TH           189.2         (8.9)       -
GAMCO INVESTO-A   GBL US           190.9       (121.0)       -
GCP APPLIED TECH  GCP US         1,252.0       (134.3)     177.5
GCP APPLIED TECH  43G GR         1,252.0       (134.3)     177.5
GCP APPLIED TECH  GCPEUR EU      1,252.0       (134.3)     177.5
GNC HOLDINGS INC  IGN GR         2,011.1        (51.2)     535.6
GNC HOLDINGS INC  GNC US         2,011.1        (51.2)     535.6
GNC HOLDINGS INC  IGN TH         2,011.1        (51.2)     535.6
GNC HOLDINGS INC  GNC1EUR EU     2,011.1        (51.2)     535.6
GOGO INC          GOGO US        1,277.3       (116.5)     271.3
GOGO INC          G0G GR         1,277.3       (116.5)     271.3
GOGO INC          G0G QT         1,277.3       (116.5)     271.3
GREEN PLAINS PAR  GPP US            90.6        (64.2)       4.6
GREEN PLAINS PAR  8GP GR            90.6        (64.2)       4.6
GT BIOPHARMA INC  GTBP US            0.0        (20.1)     (20.1)
GT BIOPHARMA INC  GTBP FP            0.0        (20.1)     (20.1)
GT BIOPHARMA INC  OXISEUR EU         0.0        (20.1)     (20.1)
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB US         2,132.2       (214.3)     271.4
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB GR         2,132.2       (214.3)     271.4
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB TH         2,132.2       (214.3)     271.4
H&R BLOCK INC     HRBEUR EU      2,132.2       (214.3)     271.4
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH GR        34,566.0     (5,079.0)   3,566.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCA US        34,566.0     (5,079.0)   3,566.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH TH        34,566.0     (5,079.0)   3,566.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH QT        34,566.0     (5,079.0)   3,566.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCAEUR EU     34,566.0     (5,079.0)   3,566.0
HORTONWORKS INC   HDP US           213.3        (43.3)     (35.6)
HORTONWORKS INC   14K GR           213.3        (43.3)     (35.6)
HORTONWORKS INC   14K QT           213.3        (43.3)     (35.6)
HORTONWORKS INC   HDPEUR EU        213.3        (43.3)     (35.6)
HOVNANIAN-A-WI    HOV-W US       1,822.3       (471.2)   1,077.8
HP COMPANY-BDR    HPQB34 BZ     31,934.0     (4,339.0)    (617.0)
HP INC            HPQ* MM       31,934.0     (4,339.0)    (617.0)
HP INC            HPQ US        31,934.0     (4,339.0)    (617.0)
HP INC            7HP TH        31,934.0     (4,339.0)    (617.0)
HP INC            7HP GR        31,934.0     (4,339.0)    (617.0)
HP INC            HPQ TE        31,934.0     (4,339.0)    (617.0)
HP INC            HPQ CI        31,934.0     (4,339.0)    (617.0)
HP INC            HPQ SW        31,934.0     (4,339.0)    (617.0)
HP INC            HWP QT        31,934.0     (4,339.0)    (617.0)
HP INC            HPQCHF EU     31,934.0     (4,339.0)    (617.0)
HP INC            HPQUSD EU     31,934.0     (4,339.0)    (617.0)
HP INC            HPQUSD SW     31,934.0     (4,339.0)    (617.0)
HP INC            HPQEUR EU     31,934.0     (4,339.0)    (617.0)
IDEXX LABS        IDXX US        1,637.1        (86.1)     (82.8)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 GR         1,637.1        (86.1)     (82.8)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 TH         1,637.1        (86.1)     (82.8)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 QT         1,637.1        (86.1)     (82.8)
IDEXX LABS        IDXX AV        1,637.1        (86.1)     (82.8)
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMU GR           181.4       (173.2)      94.1
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMGN US          181.4       (173.2)      94.1
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMU TH           181.4       (173.2)      94.1
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMU QT           181.4       (173.2)      94.1
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMGNEUR EU       181.4       (173.2)      94.1
IMMUNOMEDICS INC  IMMU US          162.6        (59.5)      35.1
IMMUNOMEDICS INC  IM3 GR           162.6        (59.5)      35.1
IMMUNOMEDICS INC  IM3 TH           162.6        (59.5)      35.1
IMMUNOMEDICS INC  IM3 QT           162.6        (59.5)      35.1
INNOVIVA INC      INVA US          372.0       (296.7)     171.0
INNOVIVA INC      HVE GR           372.0       (296.7)     171.0
INNOVIVA INC      INVAEUR EU       372.0       (296.7)     171.0
INSPIRED ENTERTA  INSE US          213.4         (2.1)      (1.4)
INSTRUCTURE INC   INST US          130.1         (4.1)     (14.7)
INSTRUCTURE INC   1IN GR           130.1         (4.1)     (14.7)
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX GR         1,255.2       (439.0)     (83.8)
JACK IN THE BOX   JACK US        1,255.2       (439.0)     (83.8)
JACK IN THE BOX   JACK1EUR EU    1,255.2       (439.0)     (83.8)
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX QT         1,255.2       (439.0)     (83.8)
JAMIESON WELLNES  JWEL CN          505.1       (180.5)    (286.4)
JAMIESON WELLNES  2JW GR           505.1       (180.5)    (286.4)
JAMIESON WELLNES  JWELEUR EU       505.1       (180.5)    (286.4)
JUST ENERGY GROU  JE US          1,271.0        (69.8)     114.4
JUST ENERGY GROU  1JE GR         1,271.0        (69.8)     114.4
JUST ENERGY GROU  JE CN          1,271.0        (69.8)     114.4
KADMON HOLDINGS   KDMN US           47.3        (38.3)     (26.1)
KADMON HOLDINGS   KDF GR            47.3        (38.3)     (26.1)
KADMON HOLDINGS   KDMNEUR EU        47.3        (38.3)     (26.1)
L BRANDS INC      LTD GR         7,763.0       (912.0)   1,199.0
L BRANDS INC      LTD TH         7,763.0       (912.0)   1,199.0
L BRANDS INC      LB US          7,763.0       (912.0)   1,199.0
L BRANDS INC      LBEUR EU       7,763.0       (912.0)   1,199.0
L BRANDS INC      LB* MM         7,763.0       (912.0)   1,199.0
L BRANDS INC      LTD QT         7,763.0       (912.0)   1,199.0
LAMB WESTON       LW US          2,485.6       (596.5)     302.8
LAMB WESTON       0L5 GR         2,485.6       (596.5)     302.8
LAMB WESTON       LW-WEUR EU     2,485.6       (596.5)     302.8
LAMB WESTON       0L5 TH         2,485.6       (596.5)     302.8
LANTHEUS HOLDING  LNTH US          267.9        (87.2)      82.6
LANTHEUS HOLDING  0L8 GR           267.9        (87.2)      82.6
MADISON-A/NEW-WI  MSGN-W US        805.0       (944.2)     168.9
MANNKIND CORP     MNKD IT           79.4       (221.2)     (34.9)
MCDONALDS - BDR   MCDC34 BZ     32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO TH        32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD TE        32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO GR        32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD* MM       32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD US        32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD SW        32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD CI        32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO QT        32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDCHF EU     32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDUSD EU     32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDUSD SW     32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDEUR EU     32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD AV        32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MCDONALDS-CEDEAR  MCD AR        32,785.2     (2,000.6)   3,149.2
MDC COMM-W/I      MDZ/W CN       1,650.3       (336.1)    (263.7)
MDC PARTNERS-A    MDZ/A CN       1,650.3       (336.1)    (263.7)
MDC PARTNERS-A    MDCA US        1,650.3       (336.1)    (263.7)
MDC PARTNERS-A    MD7A GR        1,650.3       (336.1)    (263.7)
MDC PARTNERS-A    MDCAEUR EU     1,650.3       (336.1)    (263.7)
MDC PARTNERS-EXC  MDZ/N CN       1,650.3       (336.1)    (263.7)
MEDLEY MANAGE-A   MDLY US          144.5         (4.5)      41.0
MERITOR INC       AID1 GR        2,712.0        (44.0)     117.0
MERITOR INC       MTOR US        2,712.0        (44.0)     117.0
MERITOR INC       MTOREUR EU     2,712.0        (44.0)     117.0
MERITOR INC       AID1 QT        2,712.0        (44.0)     117.0
MICHAELS COS INC  MIK US         2,060.0     (1,768.0)     445.6
MICHAELS COS INC  MIM GR         2,060.0     (1,768.0)     445.6
MIRAGEN THERAPEU  MGEN US           50.0         41.3       42.7
MIRAGEN THERAPEU  1S1 GR            50.0         41.3       42.7
MIRAGEN THERAPEU  SGNLEUR EU        50.0         41.3       42.7
MONEYGRAM INTERN  MGI US         4,410.4       (192.2)     (79.8)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  9M1N GR        4,410.4       (192.2)     (79.8)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  MGIEUR EU      4,410.4       (192.2)     (79.8)
MOODY'S CORP      DUT GR         6,536.3       (467.5)   3,321.9
MOODY'S CORP      MCO US         6,536.3       (467.5)   3,321.9
MOODY'S CORP      DUT TH         6,536.3       (467.5)   3,321.9
MOODY'S CORP      MCOEUR EU      6,536.3       (467.5)   3,321.9
MOODY'S CORP      DUT QT         6,536.3       (467.5)   3,321.9
MOODY'S CORP      MCO* MM        6,536.3       (467.5)   3,321.9
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA GR        8,295.0       (976.0)     801.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA TH        8,295.0       (976.0)     801.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI US         8,295.0       (976.0)     801.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MOT TE         8,295.0       (976.0)     801.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA QT        8,295.0       (976.0)     801.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI1EUR EU     8,295.0       (976.0)     801.0
MSG NETWORKS- A   MSGN US          805.0       (944.2)     168.9
MSG NETWORKS- A   1M4 GR           805.0       (944.2)     168.9
MSG NETWORKS- A   1M4 TH           805.0       (944.2)     168.9
MSG NETWORKS- A   MSGNEUR EU       805.0       (944.2)     168.9
NATHANS FAMOUS    NATH US           86.6        (63.6)      60.1
NATHANS FAMOUS    NFA GR            86.6        (63.6)      60.1
NATIONAL CINEMED  XWM GR         1,121.7        (68.3)      70.6
NATIONAL CINEMED  NCMI US        1,121.7        (68.3)      70.6
NATIONAL CINEMED  NCMIEUR EU     1,121.7        (68.3)      70.6
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR GR         6,080.0     (4,923.0)     767.0
NAVISTAR INTL     NAV US         6,080.0     (4,923.0)     767.0
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR TH         6,080.0     (4,923.0)     767.0
NEFF CORP-CL A    NEFF US          666.9       (112.0)       8.9
NEFF CORP-CL A    NFO GR           666.9       (112.0)       8.9
NEW ENG RLTY-LP   NEN US           191.0        (32.1)       -
NYMOX PHARMACEUT  NYMX US            1.3         (0.7)      (0.7)
NYMOX PHARMACEUT  NYM GR             1.3         (0.7)      (0.7)
OMEROS CORP       3O8 GR            60.4        (54.9)      28.3
OMEROS CORP       OMER US           60.4        (54.9)      28.3
OMEROS CORP       3O8 TH            60.4        (54.9)      28.3
OMEROS CORP       OMEREUR EU        60.4        (54.9)      28.3
ONCOMED PHARMACE  OMED US          139.3        (53.8)      95.1
PENN NATL GAMING  PN1 GR         4,984.0       (517.5)    (127.0)
PENN NATL GAMING  PENN US        4,984.0       (517.5)    (127.0)
PENSARE ACQUISIT  WRLS US            0.4         (0.1)      (0.0)
PENSARE ACQUISIT  WRLSU US           0.4         (0.1)      (0.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1EUR EU     38,660.0    (10,277.0)   1,189.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI SW        38,660.0    (10,277.0)   1,189.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1 TE        38,660.0    (10,277.0)   1,189.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 TH        38,660.0    (10,277.0)   1,189.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1CHF EU     38,660.0    (10,277.0)   1,189.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 GR        38,660.0    (10,277.0)   1,189.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM US         38,660.0    (10,277.0)   1,189.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM FP         38,660.0    (10,277.0)   1,189.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI1 IX       38,660.0    (10,277.0)   1,189.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI EB        38,660.0    (10,277.0)   1,189.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 QT        38,660.0    (10,277.0)   1,189.0
PINNACLE ENTERTA  PNK US         3,982.2       (339.7)     (62.5)
PINNACLE ENTERTA  65P GR         3,982.2       (339.7)     (62.5)
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT US        1,354.6       (156.8)      26.5
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL TH         1,354.6       (156.8)      26.5
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL GR         1,354.6       (156.8)      26.5
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL QT         1,354.6       (156.8)      26.5
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT1EUR EU    1,354.6       (156.8)      26.5
PROS HOLDINGS IN  PH2 GR           298.0        (20.5)     147.4
PROS HOLDINGS IN  PRO US           298.0        (20.5)     147.4
QUANTUM CORP      QNT2 GR          213.0       (118.0)     (51.3)
QUANTUM CORP      QNT1 TH          213.0       (118.0)     (51.3)
QUANTUM CORP      QTM US           213.0       (118.0)     (51.3)
QUANTUM CORP      QTM1EUR EU       213.0       (118.0)     (51.3)
REATA PHARMACE-A  RETA US           71.3       (230.3)      17.5
REATA PHARMACE-A  2R3 GR            71.3       (230.3)      17.5
REATA PHARMACE-A  RETAEUR EU        71.3       (230.3)      17.5
REGAL ENTERTAI-A  RGC US         2,748.4       (835.0)     (48.2)
REGAL ENTERTAI-A  RETA GR        2,748.4       (835.0)     (48.2)
REGAL ENTERTAI-A  RGC* MM        2,748.4       (835.0)     (48.2)
REGAL ENTERTAI-A  RGCEUR EU      2,748.4       (835.0)     (48.2)
RENOVACARE INC    RCAR US            0.6         (0.2)      (0.3)
RESOLUTE ENERGY   R21 GR           728.5        (62.2)     (65.8)
RESOLUTE ENERGY   REN US           728.5        (62.2)     (65.8)
RESOLUTE ENERGY   RENEUR EU        728.5        (62.2)     (65.8)
REVLON INC-A      REV US         3,062.0       (672.4)     296.4
REVLON INC-A      RVL1 GR        3,062.0       (672.4)     296.4
REVLON INC-A      RVL1 TH        3,062.0       (672.4)     296.4
REVLON INC-A      REVEUR EU      3,062.0       (672.4)     296.4
RH                RH US          1,819.4        (46.8)     246.4
RH                RS1 GR         1,819.4        (46.8)     246.4
RH                RH* MM         1,819.4        (46.8)     246.4
RH                RHEUR EU       1,819.4        (46.8)     246.4
ROSETTA STONE IN  RST US           178.9         (0.1)     (55.9)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RS8 GR           178.9         (0.1)     (55.9)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RST1EUR EU       178.9         (0.1)     (55.9)
RR DONNELLEY & S  DLLN GR        3,831.8       (161.5)     722.1
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRD US         3,831.8       (161.5)     722.1
RR DONNELLEY & S  DLLN TH        3,831.8       (161.5)     722.1
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRDEUR EU      3,831.8       (161.5)     722.1
RYERSON HOLDING   RYI US         1,787.8        (22.6)     730.1
RYERSON HOLDING   7RY GR         1,787.8        (22.6)     730.1
RYERSON HOLDING   7RY TH         1,787.8        (22.6)     730.1
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  SBH US         2,120.5       (352.3)     638.2
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  S7V GR         2,120.5       (352.3)     638.2
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  SN US          2,218.1        (38.1)      (0.0)
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  SN* MM         2,218.1        (38.1)      (0.0)
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  13S GR         2,218.1        (38.1)      (0.0)
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  13S TH         2,218.1        (38.1)      (0.0)
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  SNEUR EU       2,218.1        (38.1)      (0.0)
SBA COMM CORP     4SB GR         7,308.9     (1,985.7)    (710.0)
SBA COMM CORP     SBAC US        7,308.9     (1,985.7)    (710.0)
SBA COMM CORP     SBJ TH         7,308.9     (1,985.7)    (710.0)
SBA COMM CORP     SBACEUR EU     7,308.9     (1,985.7)    (710.0)
SCIENTIFIC GAM-A  TJW GR         7,066.0     (1,998.1)     510.2
SCIENTIFIC GAM-A  SGMS US        7,066.0     (1,998.1)     510.2
SEARS HOLDINGS    SEE GR         8,351.0     (3,651.0)    (397.0)
SEARS HOLDINGS    SEE TH         8,351.0     (3,651.0)    (397.0)
SEARS HOLDINGS    SHLD US        8,351.0     (3,651.0)    (397.0)
SEARS HOLDINGS    SEE QT         8,351.0     (3,651.0)    (397.0)
SEARS HOLDINGS    SHLDEUR EU     8,351.0     (3,651.0)    (397.0)
SHELL MIDSTREAM   SHLX US        1,098.7       (252.5)     131.7
SHELL MIDSTREAM   49M GR         1,098.7       (252.5)     131.7
SHELL MIDSTREAM   49M TH         1,098.7       (252.5)     131.7
SIGA TECH INC     SIGA US          156.0       (303.4)      45.3
SILVER SPRING NE  SSNI US          295.6        (20.3)      49.5
SILVER SPRING NE  9SI GR           295.6        (20.3)      49.5
SILVER SPRING NE  9SI TH           295.6        (20.3)      49.5
SILVER SPRING NE  9SI QT           295.6        (20.3)      49.5
SILVER SPRING NE  SSNIEUR EU       295.6        (20.3)      49.5
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI US        8,347.7     (1,041.7)  (2,148.9)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO TH         8,347.7     (1,041.7)  (2,148.9)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO GR         8,347.7     (1,041.7)  (2,148.9)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRIEUR EU     8,347.7     (1,041.7)  (2,148.9)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI AV        8,347.7     (1,041.7)  (2,148.9)
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  SIX US         2,543.7        (49.4)    (150.5)
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  6FE GR         2,543.7        (49.4)    (150.5)
SONIC CORP        SONC US          563.8       (173.1)      60.4
SONIC CORP        SO4 GR           563.8       (173.1)      60.4
SONIC CORP        SONCEUR EU       563.8       (173.1)      60.4
SONIC CORP        SO4 TH           563.8       (173.1)      60.4
STRAIGHT PATH-B   STRP US           20.9        (10.2)      (7.4)
STRAIGHT PATH-B   5I0 GR            20.9        (10.2)      (7.4)
SYNTEL INC        SYNT US          434.1        (97.3)     122.8
SYNTEL INC        SYE GR           434.1        (97.3)     122.8
SYNTEL INC        SYE TH           434.1        (97.3)     122.8
SYNTEL INC        SYNT1EUR EU      434.1        (97.3)     122.8
SYNTEL INC        SYNT* MM         434.1        (97.3)     122.8
TAILORED BRANDS   TLRD US        2,079.7        (46.7)     753.0
TAILORED BRANDS   WRMA GR        2,079.7        (46.7)     753.0
TAILORED BRANDS   TLRD* MM       2,079.7        (46.7)     753.0
TAUBMAN CENTERS   TU8 GR         4,061.7       (111.7)       -
TAUBMAN CENTERS   TCO US         4,061.7       (111.7)       -
TOWN SPORTS INTE  T3D GR           236.6        (87.0)       4.6
TOWN SPORTS INTE  CLUB US          236.6        (87.0)       4.6
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D GR        10,316.4     (1,895.4)   1,656.3
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDG US        10,316.4     (1,895.4)   1,656.3
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDG SW        10,316.4     (1,895.4)   1,656.3
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDGCHF EU     10,316.4     (1,895.4)   1,656.3
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D QT        10,316.4     (1,895.4)   1,656.3
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDGEUR EU     10,316.4     (1,895.4)   1,656.3
ULTRA PETROLEUM   UPL US         1,762.0       (940.1)     176.1
ULTRA PETROLEUM   UPL1EUR EU     1,762.0       (940.1)     176.1
ULTRA PETROLEUM   UPM1 GR        1,762.0       (940.1)     176.1
UNISYS CORP       UISCHF EU      2,318.9     (1,630.1)     426.5
UNISYS CORP       UISEUR EU      2,318.9     (1,630.1)     426.5
UNISYS CORP       UIS US         2,318.9     (1,630.1)     426.5
UNISYS CORP       UIS1 SW        2,318.9     (1,630.1)     426.5
UNISYS CORP       USY1 TH        2,318.9     (1,630.1)     426.5
UNISYS CORP       USY1 GR        2,318.9     (1,630.1)     426.5
UNITI GROUP INC   UNIT US        4,161.2     (1,059.0)       -
UNITI GROUP INC   8XC GR         4,161.2     (1,059.0)       -
VALVOLINE INC     VVV US         1,960.0       (203.0)     227.0
VALVOLINE INC     0V4 GR         1,960.0       (203.0)     227.0
VALVOLINE INC     VVVEUR EU      1,960.0       (203.0)     227.0
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR GR         1,420.3       (284.5)     475.4
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR US         1,420.3       (284.5)     475.4
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR QT         1,420.3       (284.5)     475.4
VERISIGN INC      VRS TH         2,344.3     (1,203.2)     321.0
VERISIGN INC      VRS GR         2,344.3     (1,203.2)     321.0
VERISIGN INC      VRSN US        2,344.3     (1,203.2)     321.0
VERISIGN INC      VRSNEUR EU     2,344.3     (1,203.2)     321.0
VERSUM MATER      VSM US         1,181.8         (9.7)     438.2
VERSUM MATER      2V1 GR         1,181.8         (9.7)     438.2
VERSUM MATER      VSMEUR EU      1,181.8         (9.7)     438.2
VERSUM MATER      2V1 TH         1,181.8         (9.7)     438.2
VIEWRAY INC       VRAY US          105.6        (17.0)      39.2
VIEWRAY INC       6L9 GR           105.6        (17.0)      39.2
VIEWRAY INC       VRAYEUR EU       105.6        (17.0)      39.2
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTW US         1,247.3     (1,138.7)     (58.0)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 GR         1,247.3     (1,138.7)     (58.0)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 TH         1,247.3     (1,138.7)     (58.0)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTWEUR EU      1,247.3     (1,138.7)     (58.0)
WEST CORP         WSTC US        3,480.9       (324.5)     248.5
WEST CORP         WT2 GR         3,480.9       (324.5)     248.5
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WOW US         3,038.4       (291.2)     (28.9)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WU5 GR         3,038.4       (291.2)     (28.9)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WOW1EUR EU     3,038.4       (291.2)     (28.9)
WINGSTOP INC      WING US          114.6        (61.2)      (1.7)
WINGSTOP INC      EWG GR           114.6        (61.2)      (1.7)
WORKIVA INC       WK US            154.2         (6.1)      (2.0)
WORKIVA INC       0WKA GR          154.2         (6.1)      (2.0)
WORKIVA INC       WKEUR EU         154.2         (6.1)      (2.0)
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YRCW US        1,759.1       (410.5)     292.9
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 GR        1,759.1       (410.5)     292.9
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 TH        1,759.1       (410.5)     292.9
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YRCWEUR EU     1,759.1       (410.5)     292.9
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM US         5,596.0     (6,102.0)     307.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR GR         5,596.0     (6,102.0)     307.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR TH         5,596.0     (6,102.0)     307.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMEUR EU      5,596.0     (6,102.0)     307.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR QT         5,596.0     (6,102.0)     307.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMCHF EU      5,596.0     (6,102.0)     307.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM SW         5,596.0     (6,102.0)     307.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMUSD SW      5,596.0     (6,102.0)     307.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMUSD EU      5,596.0     (6,102.0)     307.0


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2017.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.

                   *** End of Transmission ***