TCR_Public/171005.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Thursday, October 5, 2017, Vol. 21, No. 277

                            Headlines

1776 AMERICAN: Sale of Reims' Houston Condo Units for $210K OK'd
6401 ROCKWELL: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
AAA NURSING: Has Authority to Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis
ADEPTUS HEALTH: Bankruptcy Court Confirms Chapter 11 Plan
ALFRED ANGELO: Solid Asset Solutions Commences Liquidation Sale

ALPHATEC HOLDINGS: Patrick Miles Will Lead as Executive Chairman
AMIGO PAT TEXAS: Plan Talks Further Delayed by Hurricane Irma
ARCONIC INC: Depositary Shares Delisted from NYSE
ASAD QAMAR: HH 701 Buying New York Property for $750K
AUTHENTIDATE HOLDING: Will Hold 2017 Annual Meeting on Dec. 8

AXIOM WORLDWIDE: Needs Additional 60 Days to File Chapter 11 Plan
BEACON ROOFING: S&P Affirms 'BB-' CCR Amid Increased Leverage
BEBE STORES: Incurs $139 Million Net Loss in Fiscal 2017
CASHMAN EQUIPMENT: Allowed to File Chapter 11 Plan Until Oct. 11
CATCH 22 LINY: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended Until Oct. 23

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY: Aims to Focus on Cash Flow Neutrality in 2018
COACH LAMP INN: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
COPSYNC: Kologik Buying All Assets for $1M Credit Bid & $600K Cash
CORE SUPPLEMENT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
CRANBERRY GROWERS: Wants to Obtain Financing from CoBank, Use Cash

CUMULUS MEDIA: Kicks Off Debt-Restructuring Talks
EATERIES INC: Sale of All Assets to Secured Creditors for $1.1M OKd
ENERGY FUTURE: Sempra Simplifies Oncor Takeover Financing
ENERGY TRANSFER: Moody's Rates Proposed $750MM Sr. Sec. Notes Ba2
ENERGY TRANSFER: S&P Rates New Sr. Secured Notes Due 2023 'BB-'

EQUITY HOLDINGS: Unknown Recovery for Unsecureds Under Plan
EXELCO NORTH: Oct. 12 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
FAUSER OIL: Needs More Time to Complete Claims Analysis, File Plan
FINJAN HOLDINGS: Sues Juniper Networks for Patent Infringement
FIVE LOTS: Abbott Properties Secured Claim To Be Paid in Two Years

FOLTS HOME: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended to February 11
FORESIGHT ENERGY: Jeremy Harrison Named as General Partner's PFO
GATES GLOBAL: Atlas Hydraulics Buy No Impact on Moody's B3 CFR
GENWORTH HOLDINGS: Moody's Lowers Sr. Unsecured Debt Rating to B2
GILDED AGE: Seeks Oct. 25 Extension of Plan Exclusivity Period

GLOBAL EAGLE: S&P Withdraws Ratings on Insufficient Information
GOLDMAN SACHS: Fitch Affirms BB+ Preferred Equity Rating
GOLFSMITH INTERNATIONAL: Has Until January 9 to File Ch. 11 Plan
GRACE UNITED: Case Summary & 6 Unsecured Creditors
GREAT BASIN: Common Stock Delisted from OTCQB Market

GYMBOREE CORP: Completes Financial Restructuring; Exits Chapter 11
HUDSON HOSPITALITY: Seeks Authority to Obtain Credit, Use Cash
ILLINOIS COMPOUNDING: Dolan Buying Operating Assets for $375K
JASON MAZZEI: Proposed Sale of Meadville Property Dismissed
JOHN FUCHS: Darvishes Buying Pacific Palisades Property for $3.4M

KNIGHT ENERGY: U.S. Trustee Appoints 3 More Committee Members
LABELLE TRADING: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
LEHMAN BROTHERS: 13th Distribution to Creditors Total $2.4 Billion
LEXINGTON HOSPITALITY: Wants to Extend Use of Cash Collateral
LITTLEMOON: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

MAINEGENERAL MEDICAL: Moody's Lowers Rating on $280MM Debt to Ba3
METRO HOUSING: Seeks 90-Day Extension of Plan Exclusivity Period
MIDWEST FARM: Allowed to Use PCB Cash Collateral Until Jan. 1
MIDWEST FARM: Wants to Continue Plan Exclusivity Until December 31
MIKE FARRELL'S: Creditors Oppose to Cash Collateral Use

MORGAN STANLEY: Fitch Affirms BB+ Preferred Stock Rating
MOTORS LIQUIDATION: Appraisal of 200,000 Assets Not Feasible
NATIONAL VISION: IPO Filing Credit Positive, Moody's Says
NEFF RENTAL: S&P Raised Then Withdrew CCR Amid United Rentals Deal
OCEAN RIG: Meets Nasdaq Listing Compliance Requirements

OCONEE REGIONAL: May Assume & Assign Cigna Contracts to Navicent
OL FRESH LLC: PUB Agrees to Cash Collateral Use Through Nov. 30
PBF LOGISTICS: Moody's Hikes $350MM Sr. Unsec. Notes Rating to B2
PBF LOGISTICS: S&P Affirms B+ Rating on 6.875% Sr. Unsecured Notes
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH: S&P Rates 2021 $550MM Term Loan A 'BB'

PHILADELPHIA HEALTH SYSTEM: Liquidation Plan Filed
PHOTOMEDEX INC: Resumes Trading on Nasdaq
PQ CORP: S&P Upgrades CCR to 'B+' on IPO and Debt Repayment
PRECIPIO INC: Elects Two New Members to Board of Directors
PSIVIDA CORP: Deloitte & Touche LLP Raises Going Concern Doubt

PUERTO RICO: PREPA Disappointed by Rejection of $1-Bil. Loan Offer
QUADRANGLE PROPERTIES: Plan Exclusivity Period Moved to Nov. 1
REVOLUTION ALUMINUM: Carr's To Be Paid in Cash From Property Sale
REVOLUTION ALUMINUM: DOJ Watchdog Names L. Sikes as Trustee
RIVERSTONE UTOPIA: S&P Gives Prelim BB Rating on $225MM Term Loan B

ROGERS & SON: Seeks December 31 Exclusive Plan Filing Extension
SAILING EMPORIUM: Sale of Marina Property to Brawner for $3.8M OK'd
SAXON ENGINEERING: Case Summary & 19 Largest Unsecured Creditors
SCIENTIFIC GAMES: Proposes Private Offering of $350M Senior Notes
SEARS CANADA: Seeks Extension of Stay Period to Nov. 7

SEARS CANADA: Will Seek OK for Corbeil Electrique Transaction
SHADRACH MESHACH: Unsecureds to Recoup Up to 5% Under Plan
SIGEL'S BEVERAGES: Wants to Spend Cash Collateral for Store Repairs
SIRIUS COMPUTER: Moody's Lowers CFR to B2 Amid Incremental Debt
SOCO REAL ESTATE: Selling Austin Property to Secret Buyer for $1.5M

STEWART DUDLEY: Sale of Panama City Beach Condo Unit for $265K OK'd
THOUGHTWORKS INC: S&P Assigns 'B-' CCR, Outlook Positive
VANGUARD HEALTHCARE: Cash Collateral Use Extended Until Oct. 31
VANITY SHOP: Given Until November 26 to File Liquidation Plan
WALKER RENAISSANCE: Sale of Tampa Properties to RSM for $1.6M OK'd

WEIGHT WATCHERS: S&P Raises CCR to 'B' on Performance Improvement
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC: SCEGC No Longer Committee Member
WESTMORELAND COAL: Will Collect $12 Million in Net Cash Collateral
WILLIAMS FINANCIAL: Oct. 10 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
WINDSTREAM HOLDINGS: S&P Affirms 'B' CCR, Outlook Negative

XS RANCH FUND: Seeks Dec. 15 Plan Filing Exclusivity Extension
ZETTA JET: Chapter 11 Trustee to Oversee Restructuring
[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings

                            *********

1776 AMERICAN: Sale of Reims' Houston Condo Units for $210K OK'd
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Karen K. Brown of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas authorized 1776 American Property IV, LLC, and
affiliates to sell Reims Holdings, LLC's sale of its condominium
units 204, 209, 301, 304, 406 and 1101 at 6001 Reims Road, Houston,
Texas, to SZD Investment, LLC, for $210,000.

The sale of the Properties by the Debtor to SZD Investment will be
made "as is, where is" with no representations or warranties of any
kind (except as to title).  Any liens, claims and encumbrances,
attach to the net sale proceeds in the same order of priority as
exist under non-bankruptcy law.

All ad valorem tax liens on the Properties will be paid at closing,
and the Seller's portion of all normal and customary closing costs
and fees, including but not limited to owners association fees or
dues.

The broker commissions identified in the Contract are approved and
will be paid at closing.

Erich Mundinger is authorized on behalf of the Debtor to execute
all instruments and documents and to perform all other actions
necessary to consummate the transaction contemplated under the
Order and the Contract.

The 14-day stay requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) are
waived.

              About 1776 American Properties IV

Historically, 1776 American Properties IV LLC, et al., were
companies managed by Jeff Fisher.  In 2008, Mr. Fisher began
investing in real estate in the Houston area.  Mr. Fisher worked
with friends  and other business contacts in Asia who decided to
invest in special purpose entities organized in the Cayman Islands.
The offshore companies would then loan money to Delaware based
limited liability companies, who in turn invested in real estate in
the United States.  By 2012, the U.S. based LLC's had acquired over
70 properties worth over $10 million.  As of January 2017, 1776
American Properties, et al., own 116 rental single family homes /
apartment units, five single family homes, and 76 vacant lots.  In
addition, 1776 IV, 1776 V, 1776 VII and 1776 VIII hold promissory
notes and profit sharing arrangements with various builders on
approximately 58 lots.

1776 American Properties IV LLC and its 12 affiliates sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.
Tex. Lead Case No. 17-30422) on Jan. 27, 2017.  The petitions were
signed by Jeff Fisher, director.

1776 American Properties IV estimated assets of $1 million to $10
million and liabilities of less than $50,000.

The cases are assigned to Judge Karen K. Brown.

Josh T. Judd, Esq., at Andrews Myers PC, serves as the Debtors'
bankruptcy counsel.

No trustee or examiner has been appointed in the bankruptcy cases,
and no official committee of unsecured creditors has been
established.


6401 ROCKWELL: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 6401 Rockwell, LLC
        10001 W. Roosevelt, Ste. 304
        Westchester, IL 60154

Type of Business: 6401 Rockwell, LLC is a real estate company
                  that owns in fee simple interest a property
                  located at 6401-27 North Rockwell and 2556
                  West Devon valued by the Company at $14.80
                  million.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 3, 2017

Case No.: 17-29634

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Illinois (Chicago)

Judge: Hon. Benjamin A. Goldgar

Debtor's Counsel: Chester H Foster, Jr., Esq.
                  FOSTER LEGAL SERVICES, PLLC
                  16311 Byron Drive
                  Orland Park, IL 60462
                  Tel: 708 403-3800
                  Fax: 708 403-4095
                  E-mail: chf@fosterlegalservices.com

Total Assets: $14.82 million

Total Debts: $11.98 million

The petition was signed by Mohammed T. Ghani, managing member.
A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb17-29634.pdf

Debtor's List of Five Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
City of Chicago Dept of Finance    Parking Revenue       $25,000
PO BOX 6630                            Taxes
Chicago, IL 60680

Cook County Treasurer              6401-25 North         $35,000
118 N Clark St #112                Rockwell and
Chicago, IL 60602                  2556 West Devon
                                   P.I.N. #
                                   10-36-428-009-000
                                   P.I.N. #
                                   10-36-428-009-0035

Electrical                         Installation of       $16,087
Contractors, Inc.                  upgraded WPS
1252 Ailanson Road                 computers &
Mundelein, IL 60060                software

GFS Leasing                        Lease Arrearage       $30,000
PO BOX 2290                        Payments
Madison, WI 53701

SCMS, LLC                          Financing             $75,000
9030 West Sahara Avenue            Consulting
Suite 296                          Agreement
Las Vegas, NV
89117


AAA NURSING: Has Authority to Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Victoria S. Kaufman the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California approved AAA Nursing Services Inc.'s
use of cash collateral on an interim basis in accordance with the
budget attached to the motion, as amended to include an October
2017 payment of $3,000 to the Internal Revenue Service.

The Court, however, will not authorize the use of cash collateral
on an interim basis for "Business Gifts," as listed in the Debtor's
budget, as well as payment of insider compensation in the amount of
$8,000 per month.

Finally, the Court will authorize the use of no more than $1,400 in
cash collateral under the category of "Meals and Entertainment,"
solely for the purpose of providing in-service training at the
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles.

A full-text copy of the Order dated Sept. 26, 2017, is available at
https://is.gd/P9NIYt

                      About AAA Nursing

Headquartered in Canoga Park, California, AAA Nursing Services Inc.
filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case
No. 17-12433) on Sept. 12, 2017.  The petition was signed by Omnia
Kilani, President.  The Debtor is represented by Michael Jay
Berger, Esq. and Sofya Davtyan, Esq., at the Law Offices of Michael
Jay Berger.  The Debtor estimated at least $50,000 in assets and
$100,000 to $500,000 in liabilities.


ADEPTUS HEALTH: Bankruptcy Court Confirms Chapter 11 Plan
---------------------------------------------------------
Adeptus Health Inc. (OTC: ADPTQ), the largest operator of
freestanding emergency rooms in the United States, on Sept. 27,
2017, disclosed that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas, Dallas Division (the "Court") has confirmed the
Company's plan of reorganization (the "Chapter 11 Plan").  The
Company expects to complete its financial restructuring process and
emerge from Chapter 11 in the coming days, after the conditions to
the Chapter 11 Plan are satisfied.

Upon effectiveness of the Chapter 11 Plan, reorganized Adeptus will
be owned by affiliates of Deerfield Management Company
("Deerfield"), a long-term investor in Adeptus.  The restructuring
under the Chapter 11 plan is expected to improve the financial
flexibility and operational structure of the business, while better
positioning reorganized Adeptus for long-term success.

"The Court's approval of our Chapter 11 Plan paves the way for us
to complete this financial restructuring process and emerge as an
even stronger business," said Gregory W. Scott, Chairman and
Interim Chief Executive Officer of Adeptus.  "Adeptus will emerge
from this process with the financial flexibility and operational
support necessary to continue our mission of providing the highest
quality medical care to the communities we serve."

Mr. Scott continued, "Importantly, the court's decision is a
testament to the hard work of Adeptus team members who remained
focused on our patients, operating as usual throughout this
process.  We thank our employees, partners and physicians for their
support and look forward to continuing to work together to provide
access to much needed emergency medical care."

All of Adeptus Health's owned and joint-venture freestanding
emergency rooms have and will continue to operate with their usual
high standards of quality care.

Upon effectiveness of the Chapter 11 Plan, Adeptus Health Inc. will
no longer be a publicly-held company, all shares of its Class A
common stock will be cancelled, and it will be dissolved as a
corporate entity.

Additional information can be accessed by visiting Adeptus Health's
website at www.adhc.com/restructuring or calling Adeptus Health's
Restructuring Hotline, toll-free in the U.S., at (844) 469-3932.
Court filings and other documents related to the
court-supervised proceedings are available at a website
administered by the Company's claims agent, Epiq Systems, at
http://dm.epiq11.com/ADPT.

Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP is serving as reorganization counsel
to Adeptus, and FTI Consulting is serving as financial advisor.

                 About ADPT DFW Holdings LLC

Adeptus Health LLC -- http://www.adpt.com/-- through its
subsidiaries, owns and operates hospitals and free standing
emergency rooms in partnership with various healthcare providers.
Adeptus Health Inc. is a holding company whose sole material asset
is a controlling equity interest in Adeptus Health LLC.

Lewisville, Texas-based ADPT DFW Holdings LLC and its affiliates,
including Adeptus Health, Inc., and Adeptus Health LLC, each filed
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
17-31432) on April 19, 2017, listing $798.7 million in total assets
and $453.48 million in total debt as of Sept. 30, 2016.  Andrew
Hinkelman, their chief restructuring officer, signed the
petitions.

Judge Stacey G. Jernigan presides over the cases.

Elizabeth Nicolle Boydston, Esq., Kristian W. Gluck, Esq., John N.
Schwartz, Esq., Timothy S. Springer, Esq., and Louis R. Strubeck,
Jr., Esq., at Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP serve as the Debtors'
bankruptcy counsel. The Debtors tapped DLA Piper LLP (US) as
special counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc., as chief restructuring
officer; Houlihan Lokey, Inc., as investment banker; and Epiq
Systems as claims and noticing agent.

On May 1, 2017, a nine-member official unsecured creditors
committee was formed in the case.  The committee tapped Akin Gump
Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP as counsel. The Committee retained
CohnReznick as financial advisors.

On June 19, 2017, the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee
of equity security holders.  The equity committee retained Winstead
P.C. as legal counsel.

Daniel T. McMurray has been named as Patient Care Ombudsman in the
Debtors' cases.  The PCO tapped Focus Management Group USA, Inc.,
as medical operations advisor.


ALFRED ANGELO: Solid Asset Solutions Commences Liquidation Sale
---------------------------------------------------------------
Solid Asset Solutions on Sept. 27, 2017, disclosed that Alfred
Angelo, one of the world's largest manufacturers and retailers of
Wedding Dresses, is Bankrupt! With over 60 stores in the United
States and 2,500 stores in over 34 countries, Alfred Angelo was the
most recognized name in wedding gowns as well as fashions for the
mother-of-the-bride, bride's maids, flower girl, prom dresses, and
wedding accessories.

Alfred Angelo, starting in the mid-1930's and operating until
August 2017, has closed the entire chain of its stores and
manufacturing facilities.

Commencing Monday October 1st, seven (7) American stores will be
liquidating over 30,000 new exquisite Alfred Angelo wedding gowns
and bridesmaid, flower girl and mother-of-the-bride dresses -- all
sizes -- all styles -- many are 2018 fine fashions.

Originally priced up to fifty-nine hundred dollars ($5,900), every
Wedding Gown is now only two-hundred and ninety-nine dollars ($299)
each.  Also, there is a huge selection of dresses for
mother-of-the-bride, bridesmaid, flower girls, special occasion and
prom dresses -- originally priced to five hundred and seventy-five
dollars ($575) -- are now only ninety-nine ($99) dollars each.
Stores' fixtures and furnishings are also being liquidated.

Liquidation Sales will be occurring at the following seven (7)
stores only: Firewheel Market Shopping Center in Garland, Texas;
358 S. La Cienega Boulevard, in Los Angeles, California; 4336 N
Oracle Rd #140 in Tucson, Arizona; 2120 N Rainbow Blvd. in Las
Vegas, Nevada; 1518 N Dale Mabry Hwy #8 in Tampa, Florida; 5037 S
Cleveland Ave. in Fort Meyers, Florida and 4705 Ashford Dunwoody
Road in Atlanta, Georgia.

This Liquidation Sale is being conducted by Solid Asset Solutions.
Solid Asset Solutions provides expert valuation, asset monetization
and advisory services by working with private equity sponsors,
lending institutions turnaround professionals, the insolvency
community and operating executives.  The firm brings more than 35
years of practical experience with a unique combination of skill
sets.

                      About Alfred Angelo

Florida-based Alfred Angelo -- http://www.alfredangelo.com/-- was
a  anufacturer, wholesaler and retailer of wedding gowns,
bridesmaids and social occasion dresses.  In addition to
manufacturing dresses distributed in more than 1,400 wholesale
stores worldwide, the company also operated Alfred Angelo Bridal
Signature Stores located in 24 states throughout the United
States.

Alfred Angelo Newco, Inc., and its subsidiaries commenced
liquidation under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Lead Case No. 17-18900) on July 14, 2017.   The petitions were
signed by Vanessa McIntosh, vice president, finance.  

Alfred Angelo Newco estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million
and debt of $50 million to $100 million.

The Hon. Erik P. Kimball is the case judge.

Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A., is
serving as counsel to the Debtors, with the engagement headed by
Patricia A. Redmond, Esq., and Drew M. Dillworth, Esq.  
Development Specialists, Inc. is the financial advisor.

A copy of the Chapter 7 petition, including a 1,000-page list of
creditors, mostly brides-to-be, is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/17-18900-0001.pdf


ALPHATEC HOLDINGS: Patrick Miles Will Lead as Executive Chairman
----------------------------------------------------------------
Alphatec Holdings, Inc., announced that Patrick Miles has been
appointed as executive chairman of the Company effective Oct. 2,
2017.  Quentin Blackford was also appoited as a member of the
Board, effective Oct. 2, 2017, to fill the vacancy created by
Stephen O'Neil resignation as director.  Miles will lead the
organization, and Terry Rich, Alphatec's chief executive officer,
will continue in his role, reporting to Miles.  In conjunction with
these appointments, Miles and Blackford are personally investing in
Alphatec common stock in an aggregate amount in excess of $3.5
million.

"Today's announcement marks continued execution of our vision to
reposition Alphatec as the most respected, fastest-growing company
in U.S. spine," said Mr. Rich.  "Pat and Quentin have decades of
industry experience and well-deserved reputations that speak for
themselves.  Their personal financial commitments are a powerful
testament to their personal commitments to increase shareholder
value; a conviction that has been expressed by our entire
leadership team."

Rich continued, "Pat is a globally recognized spine visionary and a
proven driver of market-share expansion.  His passionate belief
that our most important business is in the operating room aligns
absolutely with the Alphatec value system, and positions him
extraordinarily well to lead the organization.  I have great
confidence that Pat's influence on daily operations, product
development decisions, and surgeon engagements will accelerate the
business transformation that we are driving.  I look forward to
partnering with him to advance Alphatec's growth trajectory by
executing our mission to improve patient lives."

Miles brings a wealth of orthopedics and innovation expertise, with
over 25 years of industry experience, and as a named inventor on
close to 100 industry patents.  In his capacity as Executive
Chairman, he will be fully engaged, focusing primarily on further
defining and implementing Alphatec's strategic initiatives,
expanding and fortifying the Company's relationships with surgeon
customers, and leading Alphatec's new technology development. Miles
joins Alphatec following a 17-year tenure at NuVasive, Inc., where
he was a central figure in the company's expansion from a start-up
business to a global spine corporation with close to $1 billion in
revenues.  He most recently served as NuVasive's vice chairman;
prior to that, he was its president and chief operating officer,
and President of Global Products and Services.  Before joining
NuVasive, Mr. Miles held sales and marketing roles with Medtronic
Sofamor Danek and Smith & Nephew.

"I am thrilled to work closely with Terry once again to reposition
Alphatec as the next great growth story in spine.  Together, we
share roughly 50 years of spine and orthopedics expertise -- a
level unrivaled in spine leadership -- which will guide us in
determining how best to serve this market.  I look forward to
driving toward improved surgical outcomes and market share
expansion," said Miles.  "Alphatec has a broad and impressive
product portfolio, improving surgeon engagement, and great access
to hospitals; all of which position the Company exceptionally well
to take market share in today's environment.  This is a
high-caliber team driving an important mission, and I feel
incredibly lucky to be a part of it."

Blackford joins the Alphatec Board of Directors with 17 years of
experience in the medical device industry.  He is currently
executive vice president and chief financial officer of DexCom,
Inc.  Prior to joining Dexcom, Blackford was Executive Vice
president, chief financial officer, head of strategy and corporate
integrity for NuVasive.  In that role, he led the finance, strategy
and corporate development, compliance and regulatory functions.
Before joining NuVasive in 2009, Mr. Blackford held various
leadership roles with Zimmer Holdings, Inc., including Director of
Finance and Controller for Zimmer Dental.

"Alphatec has assembled an exceptional team of spine industry
leaders who are already transforming the business.  I am excited to
help shape the Company's strategic direction as Alphatec evolves
into a leading spine player," said Blackford.

In connection with these appointments, Mortimer Berkowitz III,
Alphatec's Chairman since December 2016, will transition into the
role of lead director.  In addition, Stephen O'Neil has resigned
from his position as a member of the Company's Board of Directors,
effective immediately.  Mr. Rich will also remain a key member of
the Alphatec Board.

Mr. Berkowitz said, "I would like to thank Steve for his 12 years
of dedicated service to Alphatec, and for being a trusted colleague
and counselor.  I also enthusiastically welcome Pat and Quentin to
the Alphatec family, and thank Terry for his efforts in bringing
them aboard.  They share the optimism and the vision that we have
for the future of this Company, and I look forward to serving with
them in the Lead Director role."

                      Inducement Award

As an inducement to accepting employment with the Company, and in
accordance with applicable NASDAQ listing requirements, the Board
of Directors has also approved an award to Mr. Miles of 1,000,000
restricted stock units (RSUs).

The RSUs will be granted following registration of the common stock
underlying the RSUs and will vest in equal annual installments on
each of the first three anniversaries of Mr. Miles' date of
employment if he remains continuously employed by Alphatec as of
that vesting date.  In addition, the RSUs will fully vest upon a
change in control of Alphatec.

The Board approved an amendment to Alphatec's 2016 Employment
Inducement Award Plan to increase the shares reserved for issuance
thereunder by 1 million shares, effective Oct. 2, 2017.

        Equity Investments in Alphatec Common Shares

Mr. Miles has agreed to purchase 1.3 million shares of common stock
and Mr. Blackford has agreed to purchase at least 220,000 shares of
common stock and up to 440,000 shares of common stock, all at a
purchase price of $2.26 per share (the consolidated closing bid
price of Alphatec common shares on Sept. 29, 2017), for gross
proceeds to the Company of between $3.5 million and $4 million.
The share purchases are expected to close on or before Jan. 1,
2018.  In connection with his purchase of Alphatec common stock, at
the closing, Mr. Miles will also receive a five-year warrant to
purchase up to 1.3 million shares of common stock at a purchase
price of $5.00 per share which, if exercised, will generate
additional gross proceeds to the Company of $6.6 million.

                    About Alphatec Holdings

Alphatec Holdings, Inc., through its wholly owned subsidiary
Alphatec Spine, Inc. -- http://www.alphatecspine.com/-- is a
medical device company that designs, develops, and markets spinal
fusion technology products and solutions for the treatment of
spinal disorders associated with disease and degeneration,
congenital deformities, and trauma.  The Company's mission is to
improve lives by providing innovative spine surgery solutions
through the relentless pursuit of superior outcomes.  The Company
markets its products in the U.S. via independent sales agents and a
direct sales force.

Alphatec reported a net loss of $29.92 million in 2016, a net loss
of $178.7 million in 2015 and a net loss of $12.88 million in 2014.


As of June 30, 2017, Alphatec had $84.19 million in total assets,
$92.14 million in total liabilities, $23.60 million in redeemable
preferred stock and $31.55 million total stockholders' deficit.

"We have incurred significant net losses since inception and relied
on our ability to fund our operations through revenues from the
sale of our products, debt financings and equity financings,
including the Private Placement in March 2017.  As we have incurred
losses, a successful transition to profitability is dependent upon
achieving a level of revenues adequate to support our cost
structure.  This may not occur and, unless and until it does, we
will continue to need to raise additional capital.  At June 30,
2017, our principal sources of liquidity consisted of cash of $19.1
million and accounts receivable, net of $13.1 million.  We believe
that our current available cash will be sufficient to fund our
planned expenditures and meet our obligations for at least 12
months following our financial statement issuance date," the
Company stated in its quarterly report for the period ended June
30, 2016.


AMIGO PAT TEXAS: Plan Talks Further Delayed by Hurricane Irma
-------------------------------------------------------------
Amigo PAT Texas LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas for a 21-day extension of the exclusive periods
in which to file and obtain acceptances of a plan of reorganization
through and including October 20 and December 29, 2017,
respectively.

On September 8, 2017, the Debtor requested a 21-day extension of
its exclusivity period which the Court granted. Thus, the Debtor's
exclusivity was scheduled to terminate on September 29, absent
another extension.

On August 7, 2017, Polston Applied Technologies filed a proof of
claim for $4,258,015, which amount approximately doubled the amount
of unsecured claims against the Debtor.

The Debtor tells the Court that it has been engaged in ongoing and
productive settlement conversations with Polston and several other
claimants and preparing a plan of liquidation. However, these
settlements were hampered by Hurricane Harvey in Houston -- where
the court, the Debtor, its counsel and Polston's counsel are
located -- and again delayed by Hurricane Irma in Florida, where
Polston and its decision makers are located.

The Debtor avers that currently the Parties are still in active
negotiations. While no agreement has been reached and there is no
assurance that a final deal will be reached, the Debtor believes
that additional time would be beneficial to the negotiation rather
than file a Plan and Disclosure Statement that could potentially be
discarded if a settlement is reached.

                      About Amigo PAT Texas

Amigo PAT Texas LLC, based in Houston, Texas, provides industrial
and municipal cleaning services, along with video and sonar
inspection services.

Amigo PAT Texas filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case
No. 17-32169) on April 7, 2017.  The Debtor estimated $1 million to
$10 million in both assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.  Charles L. McDaniel, sole member and manager, signed the
petition.

The Hon. Jeff Bohm presides over the case.

Aaron J. Power, Esq., at Porter Hedges LLP, serves as bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtor.


ARCONIC INC: Depositary Shares Delisted from NYSE
-------------------------------------------------
The New York Stock Exchange LLC filed a Form 25 with the Securities
and Exchange Commission notifying the removal from listing or
registration of Arconic Inc.'s Depositary Shares, each representing
1/10th ownership interest in a share of 5.375% Class B Mandatory
Convertible Preferred Stock, Series 1, on the Exchange.

                       About Arconic Inc.

New York-based Arconic Inc. (NYSE: ARNC), formerly Alcoa Inc. --
http://www.arconic.com/-- is engaged in lightweight metals
engineering and manufacturing.  Arconic's products, which include
aluminum, titanium, and nickel, are used worldwide in aerospace,
automotive, commercial transportation, packaging, building and
construction, oil and gas, defense, consumer electronics, and
industrial applications.

Arconic reported a net loss attributable to the Company of $941
million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, following a net loss
attributable to the Company of $322 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2015.  As of June 30, 2017, Arconic had $19.10 billion in total
assets, $13.35 billion in total liabilities, and $5.75 billion in
total equity.

"Arconic's results of operations or liquidity in a particular
period could be affected by new or increasingly stringent laws,
regulatory requirements or interpretations, or outcomes of
significant legal proceedings or investigations adverse to Arconic.
The Company may experience a change in effective tax rates or
become subject to unexpected or rising costs associated with
business operations or provision of health or welfare benefits to
employees due to changes in laws, regulations or policies.  The
Company is also subject to a variety of legal and regulatory
compliance risks associated with its business and products.  These
risks include, among other things, potential claims relating to
product liability (including personal injury, property loss or
similar claims), health and safety, environmental matters,
intellectual property rights, government contracts and taxes, as
well as compliance with U.S. and foreign laws and regulations
governing export, anti-bribery, competition, sales and trading
practices, and the manufacture and sale of products. Arconic could
be subject to fines, penalties, damages (in certain cases, treble
damages), or suspension or debarment from government contracts.

"Even if Arconic successfully defends against these types of
claims, the Company could still be required to spend a substantial
amount of money in connection with legal proceedings or
investigations with respect to such claims; the Company's
management could be required to devote significant time, attention
and operational resources responding to and defending against these
claims; and Arconic's reputation could suffer, any of which could
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and
results of operations," said the Company in its quarterly report
for the period ended June 30, 2017.


ASAD QAMAR: HH 701 Buying New York Property for $750K
-----------------------------------------------------
Asad U. Qamar and Humeraa Qamar ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Middle District of Florida to authorize the sale of real
property located at 150 Central Park South, Apt. 702/703, New York,
to The HH 701, LLC, for $750,000.

The Property is legally described as Lot 52, Block 1011, unit 702
and 703, New York County, Borough of Manhattan; 72 shares of 150
Central Park South, Inc. ("Corporation"), which relate to a
proprietary lease of Units 702 and 703 of the Property, which have
been combined into one unit ("Unit").

The Debtors have received a Contract for the purchase and sale of
the Property from the Buyer for $750,000 free and clear of liens
and encumbrances.  The Contract is for 24 shares of Stock of the
Corporation currently allocated to Units 702/703 and the
Proprietary Lease applicable thereto ("Allocated Shares") to the
extent it relates to the area bounded by a red rectangle as set
forth in the Contract.  The Contract relates to no other shares of
the cooperative owned by the Sellers/Debtors.

The Agreement is subject to the approval of the Corporation,
specifically to the sale of the Allocated Shares, the filing of
Department of Building plans to separately demise the Allocable
Shares from the Seller's existing unit and the combination of the
Allocable Shares into the adjoining Unit owned by the Buyer.

The proposed sale is not subject to any financing.  The Buyer has
submitted an earnest money deposit of $75,000 which will be held in
an IOLA escrow account of Bryan McKenna, Esq. at Capital One Bank,
1166 Sixth Ave., New York, New York.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/Asad_Qamar_431_Sales.pdf

The services performed by Realtor Mitchell Clifton of Keller
Williams NYC, in connection with marketing and selling the
Property, was necessary for the proposed sale and is therefore
necessary for the administration of the case and a benefit to the
estate.  The Realtor's listing agreement provides for payment of a
Commission of 6% of the purchase price.  Accordingly, the Debtors
ask the Court to authorize the payment of the Realtor's commission
in the amount of 6% of the purchase price.

The Debtors further ask that the Court authorizes them to pay all
usual and customary closing expenses and real estate taxes.

The Debtors estimate that the sale expenses and proceeds will be as
follows: (i) Broker commission: $45,000; (ii) Architect fee
[required for door placement]: $7,000; (iii) NYC transfer fee:
$10,000; (iv)  NY State transfer fee: $3,000; (v) closing attorney
fee: $5,000.  The net proceeds is approximately $680,000.

In addition, the Debtors propose to use the net proceeds in the
following manner: (i) $500,000 to the various Federal and State
entities as partial payment of the amount owed as a result of the
settlement between the United States and Florida governments and
the Debtors, as more fully described in the Debtors' Disclosure
Statement and Plan Class 11; (ii) $50,000 to the Relators as
partial payment of the amount owed as a result of the settlement
between the U.S. and Florida governments and the Debtors, as more
fully described in the Debtors' Plan, Class 11; and (iii) $130,000
(estimated) to Community Bank as partial payment for its secured
claims, as described as Classes 2 and 3 in the Debtors' Plan.

The Debtors believe that the sale of the Property is in the best
interests of the estate, as they will have the additional liquidity
necessary to fund a settlement with their creditors.  Accordingly,
the Debtors ask that the Court to grant the relief sought.

Due to the urgency of the relief sought, as closing is to occur
Oct. 15, 2017, the Debtors ask that the 14-day stay imposed by FRBP
4001 be waived.

The Purchaser:

          THE HH 701, LLC
          Bosque de Manzanos 333
          Mexico City, Mexico 11700

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Jason M. Zegans, Esq.
          286 Fifth Ave.
          New York, NY 10001
          Telephone: (646) 755-8732

                         About the Qamars

Asad U. Qamar and Humeraa Qamar sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 16-01490) on April 20, 2016.  The
petition was signed by the Debtors.  The Debtors estimated assets
and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.  The Debtors tapped
Aaron A. Wernick, Esq., at Furr & Cohen, PA, as counsel.


AUTHENTIDATE HOLDING: Will Hold 2017 Annual Meeting on Dec. 8
-------------------------------------------------------------
Authentidate Holding Corp. fixed Dec. 8, 2017, as the date of the
Company's 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.  Because the Company
did not hold an annual meeting of stockholders during the previous
year, stockholders of the Company who intend to nominate a
candidate for election to the Board or to propose other business
for consideration at the Annual Meeting to be included in the
Company's proxy materials for the 2017 Annual Meeting (including a
proposal made pursuant to Rule 14a−8 promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any notice on
Schedule 14N), must ensure that such proposal is received by the
Company's Secretary at Authentidate Holding Corp., 2225 Centennial
Drive, Gainesville, GA 30504 on or before the close of business on
Oct. 16, 2017, which the Company has determined to be a reasonable
time before it expects to begin to print and send its proxy
materials.  The Oct. 16, 2017 deadline will also apply in
determining whether notice of a stockholder proposal is timely for
purposes of exercising discretionary voting authority with respect
to proxies under Rule 14a-4(c) of the Exchange Act.  The Company
currently intends to make its proxy materials for its 2017 Annual
Meeting available beginning on or about Oct. 27, 2017.

In addition, in accordance with the requirements contained in the
Company's Amended and Restated By-Laws, stockholders who wish to
bring business before the 2017 Annual Meeting outside of Rule 14a-8
of the Exchange Act must ensure that written notice of such
proposal (including all of the information specified in the
Company's Amended and Restated By-Laws) is received by the
Company's Secretary at the address specified above no later than
the close of business on Oct. 16, 2017.  All stockholder proposals
must comply with applicable Delaware law, the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the
Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws.

                      About Authentidate

Authentidate Holding Corp. and its subsidiaries --
http://www.authentidate.com-- primarily provide an array of
clinical testing services to health care professionals through its
wholly owned subsidiary, Peachstate Health Management, LLC d/b/a
AEON Clinical Laboratories.  AHC also continues to provide its
legacy secure web-based revenue cycle management applications and
telehealth products and services that enable healthcare
organizations to increase revenues, improve productivity, reduce
costs, coordinate care for patients and enhance related
administrative and clinical workflows and compliance with
regulatory requirements.  Web-based services are delivered as
Software as a Service (SaaS) to its customers interfacing
seamlessly with billing, information and records management
systems.

EisnerAmper LLP, in Iselin, New Jersey, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended June 30, 2016, citing that the Company has a working capital
deficit and its capital requirements have been and will continue to
be significant, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.

Authentidate posted net income of $5.26 million on $34.57 million
of total net revenues for the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to
net income of $9.23 million on $24.44 million of total net revenues
for the year ended June 30, 2015.

The Company's balance sheet at March 31, 2017, showed $49.49
million in total assets, $9.33 million in total liabilities and
$40.15 million in total
shareholders' equity.

There is an outstanding aggregate principal amount of $2,545,199 of
senior secured convertible notes with a maturity date of March 20,
2018, and a secured note subordinated to the interests of the
existing senior lenders in the principal amount of $330,000 with a
maturity date of June 15, 2018.  The Company expects its existing
resources, revenues generated from operations, and proceeds
received from other transactions being considered (of which there
can be no assurance) will be sufficient to satisfy its working
capital requirements for at least the next twelve months; however,
no assurances can be given that it will be able to generate
sufficient cash flow from operations or complete other transactions
to satisfy its other obligations.


AXIOM WORLDWIDE: Needs Additional 60 Days to File Chapter 11 Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Axiom Worldwide Inc. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida for an additional 60 days extension of the time
to file its Disclosure Statement, as well as the exclusivity period
for the Debtor to file a Chapter 11 Plan.

The Court had set a third deadline of September 30, 2017, in which
to file a Plan and Disclosure Statement.

The Debtor avers it has settled all matters with its largest
creditor, which has been subsequently approved by the Court, but
the order is not yet final. Furthermore, the Debtor avers that as a
result of the settlement, the Debtor have to go to the District
Court because pursuant to the settlement, it has a bearing on the
Debtor's post-confirmation business affairs, and definitely, on the
Debtor's proposed plan as well.

A Preliminary Hearing has been scheduled for October 19 at 10:30
a.m. in Tampa, Florida, to consider the Debtor's Motion to Extend
Exclusivity Period.

                About Axiom Worldwide, Inc.

Axiom Worldwide, Inc., manufactures and distributes non-surgical
medical equipment for healthcare providers/practitioners.

Axiom Worldwide Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla.
Case No. 16-10078) on November 27, 2016, listing assets under
$50,000 and liabilities estimated between $100,000 and $500,000.
The petition was signed by James Gibson Jr., president.

The Debtor is represented by Frank A. Principe, Esq., as counsel.


BEACON ROOFING: S&P Affirms 'BB-' CCR Amid Increased Leverage
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB-' corporate credit rating on
Herndon, Va.-based Beacon Roofing Supply Inc. and removed the
rating from CreditWatch, where it was placed with negative
implications on Aug. 25, 2017. The outlook is negative.

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned our 'BB+' issue-level
rating to Beacon's proposed $970 million senior secured term loan
due 2024. The recovery rating on the senior secured term loan is
'1', indicating our expectation for very high (90%-100%; rounded
estimate: 95%) recovery for lenders in the event of a default.

"We also assigned our 'B+' issue-level rating to the Beacon Escrow
Corp.'s (a wholly owned subsidiary of Beacon Roofing Supply Inc.,
which shall, upon the consummation of the acquisition of Allied, be
merged with and into Beacon with Beacon as the surviving entity)
proposed $1.3 billion senior unsecured notes due 2025. The recovery
rating on the senior unsecured notes is '5', indicating our
expectation for modest (10%-30%; rounded estimate: 15%) recovery
for lenders in the event of a default.

"We do not rate Beacon's $1.3 billion ABL due 2023, nor the
approximately $400 million of convertible preferred equity.

"The 'BB-' rating and negative outlook reflect our expectation that
the proposed transaction will raise Beacon's adjusted leverage --
including $270 million of operating leases adjustments and $400
million of convertible preferred equity, which we treat as debt--to
6.1x from the previous 3.4x at June 30, 2017.

"The negative outlook reflects Beacon's elevated pro forma leverage
of 6.1x -- which we consider high for the rating -- and our view of
the potential for integration risks which could keep Beacon's
leverage elevated for a prolonged periodand put further downward
pressure on the rating.

"We could lower the rating on Beacon if adjusted debt-to-EBITDA
leverage did not improve to less than 5.5x over the next 12 months.
While we maintain a favorable outlook for home construction and
reroofing spending over the next 12 months, the combination of a
U.S. housing recovery stall and lack of storm activity and roof
replacements could depress earnings over the next year, resulting
in stagnant leverage metrics. A more likely scenario could be the
company experiencing difficulties integrating its acquisition(s),
increasing operational costs, and EBITDA falling in excess of our
forecast, causing leverage to remain at or above 5.5x.

"We could revise the outlook on Beacon to stable over the next 12
months if it were to realize synergies ahead of expectations and
improve leverage metrics to 5x at the end of its fiscal year ending
September 2018. Although we believe repair and remodeling spending
will continue to grow in the mid-single digit range and improve
Beacon's EBITDA and leverage, more impactful earnings—either by
way of enhanced/expedited synergy realization or by high storm
volume -- would likely be required to improve leverage to a level
more in line with the current rating."


BEBE STORES: Incurs $139 Million Net Loss in Fiscal 2017
--------------------------------------------------------
bebe stores, inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its annual report on Form 10-K disclosing a net loss of $138.96
million on $0 of net sales for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2017,
compared to a net loss of $27.48 million on $0 of net sales for the
fiscal year ended July 2, 2016.

As of July 1, 2017, bebe stores had $52.52 million in total assets,
$63.62 million in total liabilities and a total shareholders'
deficit of $11.10 million.

The report from the Company's independent registered public
accounting firm Deloitte & Touche LLP, in San Francisco,
California, for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, includes an
explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has incurred
recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows from
operations and expects significant uncertainty in generating
sufficient cash to meet its obligations and sustain its operations,
which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.

The Company incurred net losses and used cash in operating
activities in fiscal 2017 and 2016.  Cash and equivalents were
$17.0 million as of July 1, 2017.

The Company used $69.1 million and $38.6 million, net of cash in
operating activities in fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The Company's liquidity is dependent upon its ability to generate
cash from operations along with usage of its existing cash and cash
equivalents.  However, the Company no longer expects losses in the
future to be significant due to the shut down of its operations.
Subsequent to fiscal 2017, the Company expects operating expenses
to be minimal reflecting the fact that the Company's primary asset
will be its investment in the Joint Venture, and will not require
significant operating cash flow to maintain.  The Company expects
to receive cash from the Joint Venture on a quarterly basis that
will be sufficient to cover its operating expenses.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-K is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/U7K23U

                    About bebe stores inc.

Based in Brisbane, California, bebe stores inc. (NASDAQ: BEBE) --
http://www.bebe.com/-- is a women's retail clothier established in
1976.  The brand develops and produces a line of women's apparel
and accessories, which it markets under the Bebe, BebeSport, and
Bebe Outlet names.

Manny Mashouf founded bebe stores, inc. and has served as chairman
of the Board since the Company's incorporation in 1976.  Mr.
Mashouf became the chief executive officer beginning February 2016.
He previously served as the Company's CEO from 1976 to February
2004 and again from January 2009 to January 2013.  Mr. Mashouf is
the uncle of Hamid Mashouf, the Company's chief information
officer.  The Company operated brick-and-mortar stores in the
United States, Puerto Rico and Canada.  The Company had 142 retail
stores before ending all retail operations in the U.S. by May 27,
2017.  As of July 1, 2017, the Company had no remaining stores and
had fully impaired, all of its remaining long-lived assets at its
corporate offices and distribution center because of the shut-down
of its operations.


CASHMAN EQUIPMENT: Allowed to File Chapter 11 Plan Until Oct. 11
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Melvin S. Hoffman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts extended the exclusive period during
which only Cashman Equipment Corporation and its affiliates may
file a plan of reorganization from October 7 through and including
October 11, 2017, pending further Court order.

A continued hearing to consider extending the Debtors' exclusive
periods will be held on October 11 at 12:30 p.m.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtors asked the Court to extend the period during which they have
the exclusive right to (a) file a plan through January 31, 2018,
and (b) solicit acceptances of their plan through April 2, 2018.

The Debtors told the Court that they continue to communicate and
cooperate with the Committee and have made substantial progress
toward agreed terms with Lenders as to use of cash collateral and
sale procedures. The Debtors also continue to provide extensive
bi-weekly reporting to the Committee, the Lenders, and the Office
of the United States Trustee regarding the Debtors' operations and
sales efforts.

Among the lending institutions asserting liens on the Debtors'
assets are: Fifth Third Bank, Banc of America Leasing and Capital,
LLC, Citizens Bank, N.A., Key Bank, N.A., the U.S. Maritime
Administration, Pacific Western Bank, Radius Bank, Rockland Trust
Company, Santander Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo, N.A., Equitable Bank
and U.S. Bank Equipment Finance.  These Lenders have asserted
secured claims against the Debtors in the aggregate amount of
approximately $144 million.

On September 11, 2017, the Debtors filed a proposed Term Sheet
reflecting an agreement with their Lenders establishing the terms
of the Debtors' continued use of cash collateral and a protocol for
the sale of selected vessels and equipment, in each case through
January 15, 2018, and the distribution of the proceeds realized
from those sales. The Term Sheet is subject to the final approval
of the Lenders and the Bankruptcy Court.

Pursuant to the Term Sheet, the Lenders have consented to an
extension of the Debtors' exclusivity periods.

While the Debtors have made progress in these complex cases, the
Debtors said that additional work needs to be done to move to the
next phase of their reorganization.  The Debtors has anticipated
being able to advance a plan during the extended exclusive period.
As such, the Debtors asserted that to lift exclusivity at this
point would jeopardize the work that has been accomplished, the
consensus-building for which the exclusivity period is designed,
and the underlying policy of the Bankruptcy Code favoring
reorganization.

                 About Cashman Equipment Corp.

Headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts, Cashman Equipment Corp. --
http://4barges.com/-- was founded in 1995 as a barge rental and
marine contracting company with a fleet of 10 barges, 9 of which
were built in the 1950s and 1960s. Cashman Equipment and certain of
its affiliates and subsidiaries own, operate, rent, and sell a
fleet of vessels, including inland and ocean barges, marine
accommodation barges, specialized oil spill recovery barges, and
tugs, as well as marine equipment, such as cranes, accommodation
units, and marine pollution skimmers.

Cashman Equipment and certain of its affiliates and subsidiaries,
Cashman Scrap & Salvage, LLC, Servicio Marina Superior, LLC, Mystic
Adventure Sails, LLC, and Cashman Canada, Inc., filed bare-bones
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Mass. Lead Case No. 17-12205) on
June 9, 2017.  The petitions were signed by James M. Cashman, the
Debtors' president.  Mr. Cashman also commenced his own Chapter 11
case (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 17-12204).  The cases are jointly
administered.

Cashman Equipment estimated its assets and debt at between $100
million and $500 million.

Judge Melvin S. Hoffman presides over the cases.

Harold B. Murphy, Esq., and Michael K. O'Neil, Esq., at Murphy &
King, Professional Corporation, serve as Cashman Equipment, et
al.'s counsel.  Jeffrey D. Sternklar, Esq., at Jeffrey D. Sternklar
LLC, serves as Mr. Cashman's counsel, according to Mr. Cashman's
petition.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case and is represented by Michael J. Fencer, Esq., and John T.
Morrier, Esq., at Casner & Edwards, LLP.


CATCH 22 LINY: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended Until Oct. 23
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Robert E. Grossman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of New York signed an order extending Catch 22
LINY Corp. d/b/a Reel's exclusive period to file a plan of
reorganization through and including October 23, 2017, and the time
to solicit votes thereon through and including January 23, 2018.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on August 7, 2017, the
Debtor requested the Court to further extend its exclusive period
to file a plan of reorganization through November 1, well as its
exclusive period to solicit votes on a filed plan through January
5, 2018.

The Debtor asserted that its ability to fund a Chapter 11 Plan will
be dependent upon the success of its ongoing business operations.
The plan will be funded from operations of the business and having
several months of actual operations upon which to base the
projections will be of great import to the Debtor.

The Debtor told the Court that it has been currently in the process
of reviewing its operations and future cash flow projections all in
contemplation of a Plan filing.  The Debtor expected to fund its
plan largely from the Summer months, the restaurant's busy season.

Consequently, the Debtor needed more time to assess revenues and
expenses for the Summer of 2017. The Debtor alleged that actual
operations for these months will give a benchmark for projections
for the next five to eight years. In addition, the Debtor claimed
that it has engaged two new managers on April 4, 2017, and
operations have been ongoing to improve the quality of service,
reduce expenses and increase revenue in order to fund a Plan.

The Debtor also needed more time to review and assess the claims
filed against it and also to defend the attempt by its Landlords to
terminate its leases which will be essential to the Debtor's
reorganization. A hearing on the issue as to whether a pre-petition
termination of the Leases occurred as well as the Debtor's motion
to assume those same Leases has been scheduled for September 28.

Accordingly, the Debtor said that cause exists to grant the
proposed extensions of the current exclusive periods. The Debtor
believed that it will be essential and therefore beneficial to the
estate and its creditors that the Debtor will be afforded the time
necessary in an environment where the Debtor will not distracted
with the concomitant threat of competing plans, unproductive
confrontations and the increasing administrative costs associated
therewith.

                   About Catch 22 LINY Corp.

Catch 22 LINY Corp. is a corporation incorporated under the laws of
the State of New York with a restaurant business located at 1 Main
Street and 99 Ocean Avenue, East Rockaway, New York.

An involuntary petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-75160) was
filed against Catch 22 LINY Corp., dba Reel, under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code on Nov. 5, 2016.  The petition was filed by
Anthony Chiodi, Willys Fish Corporation and Westbury Fish Co.,
Inc.

By Answer dated November 29, 2016, the Debtor consented to the
entry of an order for relief under Chapter 11 and on December 2,
the Court entered an Order for Relief.

The case is assigned to Judge Robert E. Grossman.

The Debtor is represented by Robert J. Spence, Esq., at Spence Law
Office, P.C.  The Debtor hired E. Knice, CPA, P.C., as accountant.

The petitioners are represented by Joseph M. Mattone, Esq., at
Mattone, Mattone, Mattone, LLP.

An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has not been appointed
by the Office of the United States Trustee and a trustee or
examiner has not been appointed in this case.

The Debtor withdrew its designation/election as a "small business
debtor" on May 31, 2017.


CHESAPEAKE ENERGY: Aims to Focus on Cash Flow Neutrality in 2018
----------------------------------------------------------------
The management of Chesapeake Energy Corporation presented at the
Deutsche Bank 2017 Leveraged Finance Conference on Oct. 3, 2017.  A
slide presentation of materials used at the conference is
accessible via the Investor Presentations section of the Company's
website: http://www.chk.com/investors/presentations.

The Company's priorities for the second half of 2017 and 2018 are:
(a) delivering the 2017 plan; (b) $2-$3 billion of asset sales; (c)
focusing on cash flow neutrality; (d) retaining posture for growth;
and (e) capital allocation focused on portfolio expansion
optionality.

                    About Chesapeake Energy

Based in Oklahoma City, Chesapeake Energy Corporation's (NYSE:CHK)
-- http://www.chk.com/-- is focused on discovering and developing
its large and geographically diverse resource base of
unconventional oil and natural gas assets onshore in the United
States.  The company also owns oil and natural gas marketing and
natural gas compression businesses.

Chesapeake Energy reported a net loss available to common
stockholders of $4.92 billion on $7.87 billion of total revenues
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net loss available
to common stockholders of $14.85 billion on $12.76 billion of total
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of June 30, 2017,
the Company had $11.92 billion in total assets, $12.60 billion in
total liabilities and a total deficit of $684 million.

                          *    *    *

In January 2017, S&P Global Ratings raised its corporate credit
rating on Chesapeake Energy to 'B-' from 'CCC+, and removed the
ratings from CreditWatch with positive implications where S&P
placed them on Dec. 6, 2016.  The rating outlook is positive.  "The
upgrade of Chesapeake to 'B-' reflects our assessment of the
company's improved liquidity profile and financial measures," said
S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Paul Harvey.

Chesapeake Energy carries a 'Caa1' corporate family rating from
Moody's Investors Service.  Moody's said Chesapeake's 'Caa1' CFR
incorporates its improving but modest cash flow generation at
Moody's commodity price estimates relative to the company's high
debt levels.


COACH LAMP INN: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
--------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Oct. 2 disclosed in a court
filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Coach Lamp Inn, Inc.

Coach Lamp Inn is represented by:

     Richard L. Gilman, Esq.
     Gilman & Edwards, LLC
     8401 Corporate Drive, Suite 450
     Hyattsville, MD 20785
     Phone: (301)731-3303
     Email: kedwards@gilmanedwards.com
     Email: rgilman@gilmanedwards.com

                   About Coach Lamp Inn Inc.

Coach Lamp Inn, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 17-20735) on August 8,
2017.  Simerjeet Pannu, owner, signed the petition.  

Judge Michelle M. Harner presides over the case.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets and liabilities of less than $50,000.


COPSYNC: Kologik Buying All Assets for $1M Credit Bid & $600K Cash
------------------------------------------------------------------
COPsync, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Louisiana to authorize bidding procedures in connection
with the sale of substantially all assets to Kologik Capital, LLC,
in exchange for

   (i) a credit bid of $1,000,000;

  (ii) retire the outstanding balance of the Debtor's DIP loan on
the date of closing, up to a maximum of $331,597;

(iii) cash of $600,000, payable within 90 days of closing;

  (iv) membership interests in Kologik equaling 10% of its total
membership interest, redeemable by the Debtor in three years in
return for $1,000,000 (at the Debtor's option); and

   (v) payment of all cure payment liabilities (if any) on assumed
contracts and assumed leases.

Through its restructuring professionals' efforts, COPsync made
contact with Thinkstream Acquisition, LLC, doing business as
Kologik.  After expressing a serious interest in the COPsync,
Kologik began a due diligence process that recently culminated in
the Asset Purchase Agreement dated Sept. 29, 2017 ("Stalking Horse
APA") by and between the COPsync, on the one hand, and Koligik's
wholly owned subsidiary, the Purchaser, on the other.  Through the
Stalking Horse APA, COPsync will sell its assets in return for a
combination of credit, cash and equity.

In addition to the Stalking Horse APA, the Purchaser purchased an
assignment of the Dominion Credit Facility from Dominion on
Sept.29, 2017 and, as a result, is now the holder of that credit
facility.  As of the date of the filing of the petition, the
Purchaser is credit bidding the sum of $1,000,000 as a part of its
bid under the Stalking Horse APA.  

Relatedly, Kologik agreed to assist in funding COPsync's emergency
cash needs through (i) a secured note in the amount of $15,000
issued Sept. 22, 2017, and (ii) a secured note in the amount of
$16,597 issued Sept. 25, 2017 ("Kologik Secured Notes") that were
perfected by a UCC-1 filed in Delaware on Sept. 25, 2017.

Finally, Kologik agreed to assist COPsync with its postpetition
cash needs by helping fund a $300,000 DIP Loan through an
affiliated company, Kologik Financing Partners, LLC ("KFP").

The salient terms of the Stalking Horse APA are:

     a. Purchased Assets: All assets of the Debtor other than those
Excluded Assets.

     b. Excluded Assets. (i) Brandon-COPsync, LLC receivable, (ii)
vehicles and other rolling stock, and (iii) tort claims and Chapter
5 avoidance actions

     c. Purchase Price: (i) Credit Bid of $1,000,000; (ii) retire
the outstanding balance of the Debtor's DIP loan on the date of
closing, up to a maximum of $331,597; (iii) cash of $600,000,
payable within 90 days of closing; (iv) membership interests in
Kologik equaling 10% of its total membership interest, redeemable
by the Debtor in three years in return for $1,000,000 (at the
Debtor's option); and (v) payment of all Cure Payment Liabilities
(if any) on Assumed Contracts and Assumed Leases.

     d. Break-Up Fee: $100,000

     e. Closing: The sale of the Purchased Assets will be closed
within five days from the entry of the Sale Order.

The UCC security interests against the Debtor are:

     1. Multiple UCC Financing Statements filed by Bank of New
Hampshire ("BNH") in contract rights affecting (i) Agency Bookings
for VidTac-Related Bookings totaling $313,477 and (ii) Brite
Computer-Related Bookings totaling $205,869.  A later UCC amendment
changed the name of the debtor from the Debtor to Patsy's Leasing
Corp.  Thus, the Debtor is no longer the debtor associated with
this UCC-1 filing.

     2. UCC Financing Statement filed Oct.10, 2016 in favor of
Dominion Capital LLC, evidencing perfection of the Dominion Credit
Facility (since assigned to the Purchaser).

     3. UCC financing Statement dated Sept. 13, 2017 in favor of
MEF I, L.P. in that certain receivable due from Brandon-COPsync,
LLC (which receivable is excluded from the Purchased Assets).
COPsync borrowed $330,000 from MEF I, L.P. on April 6, 2017 and
Dominion Capital released its lien in the Brandon-COPsync, LLC in
MEF I, L.P.'s favor as a part of that transaction and that
receivable is part of the Excluded Assets.

     4. UCC financing Statement dated Sept. 20, 2017 in favor of
the Brewer Group.  The Debtor considers this UCC filing is to
constitute a preference under section 547 of the Bankruptcy Code
and, even if it were not, it ranks behind the lien of the
Purchaser.

     5. UCC financing Statement dated Sept. 25, 2017 in favor of
Kologik.  The Kologik filing was contemporaneous with two loans
made by it to the Debtor, which loans are proposed to be
"rolled-up" in to the KFP DIP Facility.  Regardless, Kologik
consents to the sale under section 363(f).

According to the Debtor's books and records, its obligation to BNH
has been changed to Patsy's Leasing Corp.  Thus, the Dominion
Credit Facility assigned to the Purchaser is the senior secured
debt against the Purchased Assets.

The Debtor is aware of other attempted perfections of security
interests in the state of Texas.  This includes at least one other
party, Making Sense, LLC, that has recently attempted to perfect an
interest in the Purchased Assets by filing a UCC-1 with the Texas
secretary of state on Aug. 7, 2017.  The Debtor, however, takes the
position that such filings are ineffective under the UCC as the
provisions of the UCC require that to be effective a financing
statement must be filed with the appropriate office in the state of
incorporation of the Debtor.  

In this case, the Debtor is incorporated under the laws of the
state of Delaware, and UCC lien filings must be made in Delaware.
Moreover, the Aug. 7, 2017 filing was made within the 90 days
prepetition and is clearly preferential.  Notwithstanding the
ineffectiveness of a Texas UCC filing in order to perfect an
interest against the Debtor, and the preferential nature of the
Aug. 7, 2017 filing, in an abundance of caution, the Debtor has
added Making Sense to the special Mennonite notice list.

The Debtor asks that the Court approves the Sale of the Purchased
Assets as free and clear on any liens, claims and interests whether
now known, with any such liens, claims and interests attaching
instead to the proceeds of any such Sale, with the Purchaser having
the full right to credit bid its Dominion Credit Facility
position.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Due Diligence: The Bid Procedures establish a procedure for
parties interested in the Purchased Assets to gain access to due
diligence materials needed to review prior to making an "as is,
where is" offer.

     b. Deposit: A Qualified Bidder must provide a 10% deposit that
remains non-refundable through the closing of the Sale if they are
selected as the Successful or Back-up Bidder.

     c. Minimum Bid: A Qualified Bidder must specify the amount of
cash or other form of consideration acceptable to the Debtor
offered by the bidder for the Purchased Assets, with a minimum
initial bid comprised of two components: (i) a cash bid of
2,100,000 (computed as the Purchaser's $1,000,000 credit bid of the
Dominion Credit Facility, plus the Purchaser's credit bid of the
$300,000 DIP Facility, plus the Purchaser's $600,000 bid of cash,
plus the Purchaser's $100,000 breakup fee, plus the $100,000
minimum overbid increment); and (ii) a cash or other consideration
bid that the Debtor in its reasonable discretion considers to equal
in value the Purchaser's 10% membership interest and associated
option, which membership interest and option will have a minimum
value for the purposes of the Sale of $500,000.

     d. Bid Deadline: TBD

     e. Credit Bidding: The Bid Procedures allow the Purchaser's
credit bid.

     f. The Auction: The Auction will occur at 10:00 a.m. at the
offices of Adams & Reese, LLP on the day of the Sale Hearing.
After announcing the current high bid, the Debtor will preside over
the Auction.

     g. Bid Increments: $100,000

     h. Break-up Fee: $100,000

     i. Failure to Consummate Purchase: Should the Successful
Bidder fail to consummate the Sale within five days of the issuance
of the Sale Consummation Order, the Debtor will call upon the
Back-up Bidder to close the Sale and the Successful Bidder will
forfeit its Deposit. Should the Back-up Bidder fail to close the
Sale, the Back-up Bidder will likewise forfeit its deposit.

The Debtor asks a hearing on the Bid Procedures Order on a special
setting as a first day order and intends to move separately for
such a hearing.

A copy of the Stalking Horse APA and the Bidding Procedures
attached to the Motion is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/COPsync_Inc_6_Sales.pdf

The Debtor asks the Court to approve the assumption of the
Contracts and Leases, and the assignment to the Successful Bidder
in association with the purchase of the Purchased Assets.  In
association therewith, the Debtor also asks approval of the
Assignment Procedures, which will govern the determination any cure
payments and objections.

The Debtor asks that the Sale Hearing occur within 60 days
following the entry of the Bid Procedures Order.

The Debtor asks the Court to waive the 14-day stay provided under
F.R.B.P. Rule 6004(h).

The Purchaser:

          KOLOGIK CAPITAL, LLC
          2638 S. Sherwood Forest, Suite 222
          Baton Rouge, LA 70816
          Attn: Matthew D. Teague, CEO
          Telephone: (225) 361-8420 (office)
          Telephone: (225) 892-4137 (cell)
          Facsimile: (225) 361-8421
          E-mail: matthewdteague@gmail.com

The Purchaser is represented by:

          c/o Brandon A. Brown, Esq.
          STEWART ROBBINS & BROWN, LLC
          One American Place
          301 Main Street, Suite 1640
          Baton Rouge, LA 70801
          Telephone: (225) 231-9998
          Facsimile: (225) 709-9467
          E-mail: bbrown@stewartrobbins.com

Dominion can be reached at:

          DOMINION CAPITAL, LLC
          341 W. 38th Street, Suite 800
          New York, NY 10018-9686

                       Road to Bankruptcy

COPsync completed a $10.6 million equity financing capital raise in
November 2015 and was listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market exchange.
In tandem with the capital raise, COPsync hired various
consultants to help market and grow the company.  Despite the
capital raise and the marketing and growth strategies, the
company's stock has been declining since the end of 2015.

Requiring liquidity, COPsync entered into a series of credit
facilities, from Sept. 26, 2016 to March 20, 2017, with Dominion
Capital Corp. ("Dominion Credit Facility").  The Dominion Credit
Facility consisted of three term loans to COPsync.  Under the
Dominion Credit Facility, COPsync secured its borrowings from
Dominion with an "all interests" security interest in all of its
property, including but not limited to FF&E, accounts receivable,
intangibles and intellectual property.

Since entering into the Dominion Credit Facility, COPsync has
continued to struggle to meet its operational cash needs.  From
November 2016 to June 2017, a board member made a series of six
loans to COPsync for a total of $770,000 in order to fund its
payroll obligations.  Unable to gain control of its cash needs, and
consistently unable to make payroll, COPsync engaged restructuring
professionals to assist it with determining whether it could
successfully emerge from its downward trend.

By Aug. 31, 2017, COPsync's unpaid payroll obligations exceeded
$400,000 and it was forced to enter into a settlement of those
obligations with the Department of Labor.  Left with little to no
options, as it was continually unable to fund its current payroll
obligations, much less the agreed upon payments to the Department
of Labor, COPsync was left with no option but to reduce its
operations and seek the sale of its assets or enterprise in an
attempt to derive the going concern value of its enterprise for its
creditors and interest holders.

COPsync's restructuring professionals worked diligently to locate
potential buyers for its business and several parties indicated
interest.  Over the past five months, COPsync has engaged with
current creditors, existing shareholders, business partners, and
other market participants in this space to recapitalize the company
in an attempted out-of-court restructuring and ultimately to market
the company's assets.

                          About COPsync

COPsync, Inc. was created in 2005 as a "software for a service" or
"SaaS" platform for law enforcement to share real-time information
amongst counties, agencies, and departments.  It was created in
response to the 2000 death of one of COPsync's co-founders'
colleagues and friends, Texas Department of Public Safety Trooper
Randy Vetter, who was killed making what he believed to be a
routine traffic stop for a seatbelt violation.

The company currently serves over 2,000 customers, including law
enforcement agencies and state, county and local law enforcement
departments; schools; and private sector companies that are
hi-target facilities.

The Company's products include nationally shared network of law
enforcement information COPsync Network, software-driven in-car HD
video system Vidtac, real-time threat alert system COPsync911, and
court buildings security provider COURTsync.

COPsync completed a $10.6 million equity financing capital raise in
November 2015 and became listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market
exchange (COYN).

COPsync, Inc., filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 17-12625) on
Sept. 29, 2017.

Counsel for the Debtor:

          John M. Duck, Esq.
          Robin B. Cheatham, Esq.
          Victoria P. White, Esq.
          Scott R. Cheatham, Esq.
          ADAMS AND REESE LLP
          701 Poydras Street, Suite 4500
          New Orleans, LA 70139
          Telephone: (504) 581-3234
          Facsimile: (504) 566-0210
          E-mail: john.duck@arlaw.com
                  robin.cheatham@arlaw.com
                  victoria.white@arlaw.com
                  scott.cheatham@arlaw.com


CORE SUPPLEMENT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Core Supplement Technology, Inc.
        4645 North Ave
        Oceanside, CA 92056

Type of Business: Core Supplement Technology --
                      http://www.coresupplementtech.com--  
                      partners with various companies and
                      professionals to develop and sell advanced
                      supplements, from formulation, flavoring,
                      manufacturing to delivery and brand-support.
                      Core's manufacturing facility is
                      headquartered on the West Coast in
                      Oceanside, California, providing state-of-
                      the-art FDA compliant, NSF & cGMP certified
                      turnkey supplement manufacturing.  The
                      brands the Company works with range from
                      small start-ups to nationally and
                      internationally known brands.  Core's
                      clients include nutritionists, doctors,
                      trainers, competitors, as well as
                      supplement & nutraceutical companies.
                     
Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 3, 2017

Case No.: 17-06078

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of California (San Diego)

Judge: Hon. Margaret M. Mann

Debtor's Counsel: Stephen C. Hinze, Esq.
                  STEPHEN C. HINZE, ATTORNEY AT LAW A PC
                  217 Civic Center Drive, Suite 10
                  Vista, CA 92084
                  Tel: 760-330-9472
                  Fax: 760-330-9496
                  E-mail: sch@schinzelaw.com

Total Assets: $2.82 million

Total Liabilities: $5.60 million

The petition was signed by Joseph Odea, president.

A full-text copy of the petition, along with a list of 20 largest
unsecured creditors, is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/casb17-06078.pdf


CRANBERRY GROWERS: Wants to Obtain Financing from CoBank, Use Cash
------------------------------------------------------------------
Cranberry Growers Cooperative, d/b/a CranGrow asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Wisconsin to approve
its postpetition Debtor-in-Possession financing from CoBank ACB and
its use of the cash collateral of CoBank arising from a prepetition
secured loan to the Debtor.

The proposed 19-Week Budget provides total operating disbursements
of approximately $2,776,329 and total non-operating disbursements
in the aggregate sum of $3,168,530 during the week ending Sept. 10,
2017 through Jan. 21, 2018.

The material terms of the proposed financing arrangement, among
other things are:

     A. Guarantors: Daniel Rezin; Fredrick & Linda Prehn; Gary
Jensen; James Van Wychen; Kurt Rutlin; Linda Pionkowski; Raymond
Hableman; and Vicki Nemitz.

     B. DIP Facility: The DIP facility will be comprised of a
committed, secured revolving line of credit in an aggregate
principal amount as of any day equal to the lesser of:

         (a) $13.25 million (the Maximum Commitment Amount); or
         (b) the Borrowing Base as of such day;

     C. Borrowing Base: The Borrowing Base will be as set forth in
the Revolving Note and Loan Documents with respect to assets of the
Debtor. CoBank may (among other things) establish additional
standards of eligibility, adjust reserves, and adjust advance rates
from time to time and may, consent to overadvances in each case in
an amount not to exceed $4.0 million during the period from the
commencement of Debtor's bankruptcy filing through the Maturity
Date.

     D. Interest Rate: Outstanding advances under the DIP Facility
and the Prepetition Indebtedness relating to the Revolving Note
will bear interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 5%. All Pre-Petition
Indebtedness related to the Term Note will continue to bear
interest at the existing rate as currently set forth in the Loan
Documents.

     E. Use of Proceeds: Proceeds will be used to provide for
working capital, and other general corporate purposes and
administrative expenses of the Debtor during its Chapter 11 Case,
in accordance with the Budget.

     F. Postpetition Collateral: The DIP Facility will be secured
by a first-priority perfected security interest and lien in favor
of CoBank on all collateral plus all other assets of the Debtor,
subject only to (a) valid, perfected, prior, non-avoidable,
prepetition liens permitted under Section 6.3 of the Credit
Agreement, (b) subject to CoBank's approval, a lien in favor of
Farm Credit Leasing Corporation on bins acquired by the Debtor
post-petition, and (c) the Carveout.

     G. Adequate Protection and Use of Cash Collateral: The Debtor
will continue to pay all amounts and fees required under the Loan
Documents, including without limitation all regularly scheduled
principal payments and interest thereon with respect to the
Revolving Note and the Term Note.

     H. Carve-out: A carve-out from CoBank's prepetition and
post-petition claims (whether secured or unsecured), including
CoBank's superpriority administrative expense claim, in an amount
equal to (a) $50,000, plus the allowed fees and expenses of the
U.S. Trustee's Office, for unpaid administrative expenses incurred
following an Event of Default occurring post-petition, and (b) an
amount equal to the payment made by Graceland Fruit, Inc. in
October and/or November 2017, up to $1,000,000, to be remitted to
growers of the Debtor, for frozen cranberries from the 2017 crop
arising from Graceland's prepayment for the purchase of such frozen
cranberries, but only to the extent Graceland has not received
delivery of such frozen cranberries. Such administrative expenses
will be limited to allowed fees and expenses of the U.S. Trustee's
office, the Debtor's counsel and other professionals that are
approved by the Bankruptcy Court, and any professionals employed by
an official creditors' committee.

     I. Maturity Date: The DIP Facility will mature, and all
indebtedness related to the Revolving Note will be due and payable
in full in cash, on the earliest to occur of: (a) the date that is
6 months after the commencement of the bankruptcy case, (b) upon
the closing of any sale of all or substantially all of the assets
of the Debtor pursuant to Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code or any
other sale process, or (c) upon the effective day of a confirmed
plan under section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Sept. 26, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/LzfNLv

                    About Cranberry Growers

Cranberry Growers Cooperative (CranGrow) --
https://www.crangrow.com/ -- is a group of cranberry growers based
in Warrens, Wisconsin, USA.  CranGrow currently has 40 grower
members, and it is these members that own the co-op.  The co-op's
growers range in size from small to very large cranberry marshes,
most of which have been family owned and operated for generations.
Some have been in operation for over 100 years. CranGrow produces
sliced sweetened dried cranberries, whole sweetened dried
cranberries, single strength juice (not from concentrate), 50 and
65 brix concentrate, and cranberry seed pomace.  Unlike many
cranberry processors, CranGrow actually grows the fruit and process
it themselves.

Cranberry Growers Cooperative filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
W.D. Wis. Case No. 17-13318) on Sept. 25, 2017.  The petition was
signed by James Reed, chief executive officer.  At the time of
filing, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.

The Debtor's counsel is Justin M. Mertz, Esq. at Michael Best &
Friedrich LLP.  The Debtor's financial and restructuring advisor is
Sierra Constellation Partners LLC; and the firm's Winston Mar
serves as the Debtor's chief restructuring officer.


CUMULUS MEDIA: Kicks Off Debt-Restructuring Talks
-------------------------------------------------
Soma Biswas, writing for The Wall Street Journal Pro Bankruptcy,
reported that Cumulus Media Inc. recently started talks with two
separate groups of creditors who own big chunks of the company’s
$2.4 billion in debt, according to people familiar with the
matter.

According to the report, citing people familiar with the matter,
the radio broadcaster faces key deadlines when most of its debt
matures in early 2019 and the talks could lead to a bankruptcy
filing.

Cumulus is holding talks with a group of holders of its $1.8
billion in term loans as well as with a group of bondholders, the
report related.

In February, a judge in the Southern District Court in New York
struck down a deal the company had reached with its bondholders to
extend the maturity on its unsecured notes in exchange for a
one-third equity stake in the company and up to $305 million in new
secured debt, the report further related.  The ruling came after a
group of holders in the company's $1.8 billion in term loans
successfully challenged the debt exchange, the report said.

Extending maturities on the junior bonds has been a priority for
the company: A provision in its credit agreement accelerates the
maturity on its bigger term loan to January 2019 from 2020 if more
than $200 million of the company's notes are still outstanding, the
report added.  Cumulus' $610 million in bonds mature in May 2019,
the report pointed out.

While Cumulus and its advisers are in talks with lenders and
bondholders, the situation remains fluid and an out-of-court debt
restructuring remains possible, the people added, the report
noted.

                      About Cumulus Media

Atlanta, Georgia-based Cumulus Media Inc. --
http://www.cumulus.com/-- is a radio broadcasting company.  The
Company is also a provider of country music and lifestyle content
through its NASH brand, which serves through radio programming,
NASH Country Weekly magazine and live events.  Its product lines
include broadcast advertising, digital advertising, political
advertising and non-advertising based license fees.  Its broadcast
advertising includes the sale of commercial advertising time to
local, national and network clients.  Its digital advertising
includes the sale of advertising and promotional opportunities
across its Websites and mobile applications.  Its across the nation
platform generates content distributable through both broadcast and
digital platforms.

Cumulus Media put AR Broadcasting Holdings Inc. and three other
units to Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
11-13674) in 2011 after struggling to pay off debt that topped $97
million as of June 30, 2011.

Cumulus Media incurred a net loss of $510.7 million in 2016
following a net loss of $546.49 million in 2015.

As of June 30, 2017, Cumulus Media had $2.40 billion in total
assets, $2.89 billion in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $491.8 million.

                         *     *     *

In March 2017, S&P Global Ratings raised its corporate credit
rating on Cumulus Media Inc. and its subsidiary Cumulus Media
Holdings Inc. to 'CCC' from 'CC'.  The rating outlook is negative.
"We believe Cumulus may look to exchange debt at subpar levels or
repurchase debt at discounted levels in 2017, which we would view
as tantamount to default, based on our criteria," said S&P Global
Ratings' credit analyst Jeanne Shoesmith.  "We could lower our
ratings on the company if it announces a subpar debt tender offer."
Various tranches of debt at Cumulus are currently trading at
roughly a 30% to 60% discount to par.

In April 2017, Moody's Investors Service downgraded Cumulus Media
Inc.'s Corporate Family Rating to 'Caa2' from 'Caa1', the secured
credit facilities to 'Caa1' from 'B3', and senior unsecured notes
to 'Ca' from 'Caa3'.  The outlook was changed to negative from
stable.  The downgrade reflects the elevated risk of a
restructuring of its balance sheet and its unsustainable leverage
level of 11.3x (excluding Moody's standard lease adjustments) as of
Q4 2016.


EATERIES INC: Sale of All Assets to Secured Creditors for $1.1M OKd
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Sarah A. Hall of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Oklahoma authorized the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated
Aug. 9, 2017 of Eateries, Inc. and GRP of Zanesville, LLC with
Fresh Capital LLC, Fiesta Holdings, Inc., and Practical Investors,
LLC or their nominee, in connection with the sale of substantially
all assets for $1,100,000.

An Auction was held on Sept. 25, 2017.  The Sale Hearing was
conducted on Sept. 27, 2017.

The sale is free and clear of any Interest.

Notwithstanding any provision of any contract governing the
Purchased Assets or any Assigned Contract to be assumed and
assigned to the Purchasers as of the Closing Date, the Debtors are
authorized to (a) assign the Purchased Assets to the Purchasers and
(b) assume and assign the Assigned Contracts to the Purchasers as
of the Closing Date, in each case, which assignments will take
place on and be effective as of the Closing Date unless the Debtors
and the Buyers will mutually agree to an earlier date for the
transaction to be made effective for accounting purposes so long as
such date is after Sept. 27, 2017 and before Dec. 31, 2018, or as
otherwise provided by a separate order of the Court.

There will be no accelerations, assignment fees (other than general
recording fees), increases, or any other fees charged to the
Purchasers or the Debtors as a result of the assumption and
assignment of the Purchased Assets and the Assigned Contracts.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in accordance with and pursuant to
the terms and conditions of Section 1(k) of the APA, the Debtors
may, at the Purchasers' sole discretion and direction, amend the
list of Assigned Contracts to delete any such contract in which
case such designated contract will not be an Assigned Contract and
will be excluded from the Sale.

The Sale Order constitutes a final order.  The Debtors may, in
their discretion and without further delay, take any action and
perform any act authorized under the Sale Order.

The proceeds from the sale of the Purchased Assets (net only of
those amounts set forth) will be paid indefeasibly into a
segregated account of the Debtors subject to further order of the
Court and net only of these amounts that the Debtors are authorized
to pay at Closing:

     a. To the DIP Lender, payment in full in cash of the DIP
Facility including all DIP Obligations.

     b. To holders of prior liens, if any, that are set forth and
disclosed in the closing statements in the amount of the value of
any prior liens in the Assets being sold that is agreed upon by the
holder of the prior lien and the Debtors, subject to the written
consent of the Lender, or, failing such agreement, such disputed
amount will be retained by the Debtors in the Sale Proceeds
Accounts or escrow with the title company for determination by the
Court of the extent, priority, validity, and/or value of such
asserted prior lien.

The Purchasers will not be required to seek or obtain relief from
the automatic stay under section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code to
enforce any of its remedies under the APA or any other sale-related
document.  The automatic stay imposed by section 362 of the
Bankruptcy Code is modified solely to the extent necessary to
implement the provisions of the Sale Order.

                About Eateries and Fiesta Holdings

Edmond, Oklahoma-based Fiesta Holdings, Inc., filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. W.D. Okla. Case No. 12-16223) on Dec. 28, 2012,
estimating assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of
less than $50 million.

Eateries Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Okla. Case
No. 12-16224) on Dec. 28, 2012, estimating less than $10 million in
assets and at least $10 million in liabilities.

The Chapter 11 petitions of both debtors were signed by Preston
Stockton, as president.

Both debtors are represented by:

         Stephen J. Moriarty, Esq.
         FELLERS SNIDER
         100 N. Broadway Avenue, Suite 1700
         Oklahoma City, OK 73102-8820
         Tel: (405) 232-0621
         Fax: (405) 232-9659
         E-mail: smoriarty@fellerssnider.com


ENERGY FUTURE: Sempra Simplifies Oncor Takeover Financing
---------------------------------------------------------
Peg Brickley, writing for The Wall Street Journal Pro Bankruptcy,
reported that Sempra Energy Inc. has revised the financing for its
$9.45 billion proposal to buy Oncor, a Texas power transmission
business that is largely owned by bankrupt Energy Future Holdings
Corp.

According to the report, the San Diego-based power company said
Energy Future creditors will still get cash in the deal for their
80% stake in Oncor, a profitable, regulated business; however, the
financing structure has been simplified in an effort to help the
buyout pass muster with Texas regulators.

Sempra said it and Oncor will begin the formal process of seeking
approval from the Public Utility Commission of Texas, a regulatory
body that has ended two earlier attempts to buy the transmissions
business, the report related.

Instead of bringing in outside investors, as it had originally
planned, Sempra will use its own equity and debt to pay for Energy
Future, which owns 80% of Oncor, the company said, the report
further related.  Additionally, some $3 billion worth of debt that
was going to be left on Energy Future and paid off over time will
instead be eliminated, the report said.

The financing for the Oncor deal was revised in response to Texas
stakeholders, Sempra said, the report added.

The Journal pointed out that if it hopes to close on the
acquisition, Sempra must convince Texas regulators its deal won't
add risk to Oncor's finances or complications to the utility's
corporate structure.

According to Sempra, key Texas stakeholders have said the revised
proposal has "substantially addressed" many of their concerns, and
they are open to "constructive regulatory settlement discussions,"
the report related.

                     About Energy Future

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is a
privately held diversified energy holding company with a portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas.  Oncor, an
80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the largest
regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.  The
Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth.  EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating while
reducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS).

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion.  The Debtors had $42
billion of funded indebtedness as of the bankruptcy filing.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal.  The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor, and
Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring Agreement
are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, as legal
advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor.  The EFH
equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor.  Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for the
second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is represented by
Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and Gregory A.
Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S. Weisfelner, Esq.,
Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq., Jeremy B. Coffey,
Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.

On May 13, 2014, the U.S. Trustee appointed the Official Committee
of TCEH Unsecured Creditors in the Chapter 11 Cases.  The TCEH
Committee is composed of (a) the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation; (b) HCL America, Inc.; (c) BNY, as Indenture Trustee
under the EFCH 2037 Notes due 2037 and the PCRBs; (d) LDTC, as
Indenture Trustee under the TCEH Unsecured Notes; (e) Holt Texas
LTD, d/b/a Holt Cat; (f) ADA Carbon Solutions (Red River); and (g)
Wilmington Savings, as Indenture Trustee under the TCEH Second Lien
Notes.  The TCEH Committee retained Morrison & Foerster LLP as
counsel; Polsinelli PC as co-counsel and conflicts counsel; Lazard
Freres & Co. LLC as investment banker; FTI Consulting, Inc. as
financial advisor; and Charles River Associates as an energy
consultant.

On Oct. 27, 2014, the U.S. Trustee appointed the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors representing the interests of the unsecured
creditors for EFH, EFIH, EFIH Finance, and EECI, Inc.  The EFH/EFIH
Committee is composed of (a) American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, LLC; (b) Brown & Zhou, LLC c/o Belleair Aviation, LLC; (c)
Peter Tinkham; (d) Shirley Fenicle, as successor-in-interest to the
Estate of George Fenicle; and (e) David William Fahy.  The EFH/EFIH
Committee retained Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhodes, LLP, as
co-counsel and conflicts counsel; AlixPartners, LLP, as
restructuring advisor; Sullivan & Cromwell LLC as counsel;
Guggenheim Securities as investment banker; and Kurtzman Carson
Consultants LLC as noticing agent for both the TCEH Committee and
the EFH/EFIH Committee.

Given the size and complexity of the Chapter 11 Cases, the U.S.
Trustee proposed, and the Debtors and the TCEH Committee agreed, to
recommend that the Bankruptcy Court appoint a committee to, among
other things, review and report as appropriate on fee applications
and statements submitted by the professionals paid for by the
Debtors' Estates.  The Fee Committee is comprised of four members:
(a) one member appointed by and representative of the Debtors
(Cecily Gooch, Vice President and Special Counsel for
Restructuring, Energy Future Holdings); (b) one member appointed by
and representative of the TCEH Creditors' Committee (Peter Kravitz,
Principal and General Counsel, Province Capital); (c) one member
appointed by and representative of the U.S. Trustee (Richard L.
Schepacarter, Trial Attorney, Office of the United States Trustee);
and (d) one independent member (Richard Gitlin, of Gitlin and
Company, LLC).   The Fee Committee retained Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. as
counsel; and Phillips, Goldman & Spence, P.A. as co-counsel.

                          *     *     *

On Aug. 29, 2016, Judge Sontchi confirmed the Chapter 11 exit Plans
of two of Energy Future Holdings Corp.'s subsidiaries, power
generator Luminant and retail electricity provider TXU Energy Inc.
The T-Side Debtors' Plan became effective on Oct. 3, 2016.

On Aug. 20, 2017, Sempra Energy (NYSE: SRE) announced an agreement
to acquire Energy Future Holdings, the indirect owner of 80 percent
of Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC, operator of the largest
electric transmission and distribution system in Texas.  Under the
agreement, Sempra Energy will pay approximately $9.45 billion in
cash to acquire Energy Future and its ownership in Oncor, while
taking a major step forward in resolving Energy Future's
long-running bankruptcy case.  The enterprise value of the
transaction is approximately $18.8 billion, including the
assumption of Oncor's debt.


ENERGY TRANSFER: Moody's Rates Proposed $750MM Sr. Sec. Notes Ba2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba2 rating to Energy Transfer
Equity, L.P.'s (ETE) proposed offering of $750 million senior
secured notes due 2023. The Ba2 Corporate Family Rating (CFR),
Ba2-PD Probability of Default Rating (PDR), SGL-3 Speculative Grade
Liquidity Rating and negative outlook are not affected by this
action.

Proceeds of the offering will be used to repay a portion of ETE's
$2.2 billion term loan due February 2, 2024. The notes will be
secured by the same collateral that secures ETE's existing senior
secured notes, a first-priority lien on substantially all of ETE's
tangible and intangible assets, comprised principally of its equity
interests in its subsidiaries, and will rank pari passu with ETE's
revolving credit facility and its term loan facility.

"Moody's views the notes issue as an ongoing exercise in liability
management, somewhat enhancing ETE's financial flexibility,"
commented Andrew Brooks, Moody's Vice President. "The proposed
notes issue will have no material impact on ETE's debt leverage,
either on a stand-alone or fully consolidated basis."

Assignments:

Issuer: Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.

-- Senior Secured Notes, Assigned Ba2 (LGD3)

RATINGS RATIONALE

ETE's senior secured Ba2 rating is equal to its Ba2 CFR. ETE's
notes, term loan and revolving credit facility are secured on a
pari passu basis by all tangible and intangible assets of ETE,
essentially its ownership of and equity interests in the common
units of its subsidiaries and the entities in which subsidiary
incentive distribution rights (IDRs) are held. There are no
upstream or downstream debt guarantees between ETE and its
subsidiary holdings. ETE's Ba2 CFR, term loan and notes ratings
reflect its stand-alone credit assessment as well as an analysis
under Moody's Loss Given Default (LGD) methodology, which
essentially views ETE level debt as holding company debt
structurally subordinated to debt at its operating subsidiaries.

ETE's negative outlook is consistent with the negative outlook at
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (ETP, Baa3 negative), the midstream
master limited partnership (MLP) controlled by ETE through its
general partnership holding. The negative outlook further reflects
ETE's consolidated and stand-alone leverage metrics. ETE's ratings
could be downgraded should consolidated leverage remain on a
permanent basis over 6x. A downgrade of ETP's Baa3 rating to below
investment grade could prompt an ETE rating downgrade. Should cash
distributions to ETE become compromised through higher leverage or
weakness in distributable cash flows at partnership and subsidiary
levels, ratings could be downgraded. ETE's rating could be upgraded
if its stand-alone leverage approaches 2.5x and consolidated
leverage drops below 5x. An upgrade of ETP's Baa3 rating could
prompt an ETE rating upgrade.

ETE's Ba2 CFR recognizes the very large size, scope and
diversification of the midstream asset base over which it wields
control. The rating is heavily influenced by the asset quality and
cash flows generated by the entities controlled by ETE, principally
ETP. Underpinning the credit of ETP is the asset composition of its
midstream portfolio and the predominantly fee-based cash flow
stream generated by these assets. ETP's negative outlook, however,
reflects its elevated leverage metrics, largely an outgrowth of its
very large, multi-year capital spending program. Regulatory delays
have slowed the completion of several major projects, and flat
EBITDA growth across several operating segments contributed to the
increase in ETP's year-end 2016 debt/EBITDA to approximately 6x. At
June 30, pro forma for the sale of an interest in ETP's Rover
natural gas pipeline and a $1.0 billion units offering in
September, ETP's leverage has dropped inside 5.5x. ETE's
debt/EBITDA fully consolidated for ETP approximated 6.75x, and on a
stand-alone basis (recourse debt over cash distributions received)
approximated 6x (4x adjusted for IDR waivers), both levels
excessive for the Ba2 rating. Moreover, ETE's $6.7 billion of
stand-alone debt is structurally subordinated to the roughly $38
billion of debt at its subsidiary entities. Debt service is almost
entirely dependent on distributions from ETP, including GP IDRs, a
distribution stream which is junior to ETP's own significant
financing and operating requirements. ETE's credit profile is
further challenged by its aggressive growth objectives and high
distribution payout atop a complex organizational structure.

ETE's liquidity is adequate and its day-to-day liquidity needs are
not significant, since it is essentially a flow-through partnership
entity with limited administrative overhead. ETE maintains a $1.5
billion secured revolving credit facility, under which $1.2 billion
was outstanding as of June 30. ETE has no capital spending
requirements. All subsidiaries are financed with subsidiary level
debt, and aside from the potential to provide capital with new
equity or temporarily relinquishing a portion of its IDR proceeds,
ETE has no obligation to provide liquidity to its subsidiaries. ETE
has provided ETP with $892 million of IDR waivers over the
2017-2019 period, and on January 9, 2017 issued $580 million of
equity whose proceeds were injected into ETP through a purchase of
ETP common units.

The principal methodology used in this rating was Midstream Energy
published in May 2017.

Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. headquartered in Dallas, Texas is the
general partner of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.


ENERGY TRANSFER: S&P Rates New Sr. Secured Notes Due 2023 'BB-'
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB-' issue-level rating and '4'
recovery rating to Energy Transfer Equity L.P.'s (ETE) proposed
senior secured notes due 2023. The '4' recovery rating on the notes
indicates our expectation of average (30%-50%; rounded estimate:
45%) recovery in the event a payment default occurs. The
partnership intends to use the net proceeds from the notes to repay
outstanding debt under its term loan facility and for general
partnership purposes.

Dallas-based ETE is one of the largest publicly traded U.S.
midstream energy partnerships. The corporate credit rating is
'BB-', and the outlook is stable. For the corporate credit rating
rationale, see our research update on ETE published April 28, 2017.


EQUITY HOLDINGS: Unknown Recovery for Unsecureds Under Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
Equity Holdings Group filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Colorado a disclosure statement in support of its plan
of reorganization.

The plan proposes to pay class 4 general unsecured claimants on a
pro-rata basis from the remaining balance of funds generated from
operations.

The Debtor will fund the Plan using income generated from a
combination of sources including, but not limited to, as follows:

   * Class 7 Purchase of Shares, Pursuant to Cramdown Plan
Confirmation: Should the Debtor need to offer to sell Shares to
Potential Shareholders, the Debtor shall utilize the amounts
received from said committed parties to fund payments to Clark
under Class 2 of the Plan, if any amount is deemed by the Court as
an Allowed Secured Claim, shall deposit 30% of the remaining
balance to into a "Net Available Cash Fund" for distribution to
Allowed General Unsecured Claims, and shall deposit the remaining
amount [i.e.70.00% of the remaining balance] into a "Working
Capital Account" to fund operations and ordinary expenses
throughout the life of the Plan.

   * Liquidation of Personal Property: Should the Debtor fail to
generate enough funds to finance payments at any time throughout
the life of the Plan, the Debtor shall seek approval from the Court
to sell any personal property that holds a resale value in the
amount not less than six months and to exceed one year of payments
owed to Clark on account of the Allowed Secured Claim under Class 2
of the Plan, if any. The Debtor shall allocate any and all funds
earned for such personal property liquidated as 50% distributed to
the holder of the Class 2 Allowed Secured Claim, 30% deposited into
the Net Available Cash Fund for 6 months of monthly payments to
holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims and 20% deposited into the
Working Capital Account to fund overhead and operating expenses.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated June 22, 2017,
is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob16-20096-96.pdf

                About Equity Holdings Group

Equity Holdings Group, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 16-20096) on Oct. 12,
2016.  The petition was signed by Donald A. Hulse, chief executive
officer.

The case is assigned to Judge Thomas B. McNamara.  The Debtor is
represented by Berken Cloyes, P.C.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated its assets and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.


EXELCO NORTH: Oct. 12 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
----------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, Acting United States Trustee for Region 6, will hold an
organizational meeting on Oct. 12, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in the
bankruptcy case of Exelco North America, Inc.

The meeting will be held at:

               Delaware State Bar Association
               405 N. King Street, 2nd floor
               Wilmington, DE 19801

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it
represents.

                         About Exelco

Belgium-based Exelco NV was founded by Leon and Lior Kunstler and
Jean Paul Tolkowsky in 1993. Tolkowsky is a scion of one of the
industry's most famous families, who made their name cutting the
biggest and most expensive gems.  Exelco's diamond business is a
global enterprise and Exelco has operations in numerous foreign
countries including the United States, Belgium, Mauritius, Israel,
Botswana, Hong Kong, the United Kingdom, and Thailand.

Lior Kunstler and Jean Paul Tolkowsky each own 49% of Exelco NV.

Exelco North America, Inc., and three affiliates, including Exelco
NV, commenced Chapter 11 cases (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
17-12029) on Sept. 26, 2017.

In the Chapter 11 cases, the Debtors tapped Hughes Hubbard & Reed
LLP, as bankruptcy counsel; Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP,
as local counsel; and Donlin, Recano & Co., Inc., as claims and
noticing agent.

Exelco NV estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $50
million to $100 million in debt.  Exelco North Americfa, Inc.,
estimated $0 to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
debt.


FAUSER OIL: Needs More Time to Complete Claims Analysis, File Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fauser Oil Co., Inc. and its affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Iowa to further extend the
exclusivity periods for filing a Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization
and for soliciting acceptances of such filed plan to December 21,
2017 and February 21, 2018, respectively.

The Court has already extended the statutory exclusivity period for
good cause shown, in the Extension Order entered August 22, 2017.
Without an extension, the current extended exclusivity period will
expire on October 23, and the extended deadline to obtain
acceptance of a filed plan will expire on December 21.

The Debtor contends that the complexity of these cases, the number
of related debtors, the number and amount of the various claims
filed, and the adjustment to operating the remaining core business,
all constitute good cause for the Debtors' request for further
extension.

The Debtors tell the Court that since the date of filing the First
Exclusivity Extension Motion, the Debtors have successfully
negotiated the sale of substantially all of the assets of Debtors
Fauser Oil Co. and Ron's L.P.  The sale received Court approval by
Order dated September 19, and the sale itself closed on September
29.

The Debtors anticipate that the majority of their creditors' claims
will be paid from the proceeds of sale. Further, the Debtors intend
to take action to pay creditors a portion of their allowed claims
through an interim distribution before the end of the year.

The Debtors said they need more time to complete their claims
analysis and determine the disposition of the remaining assets of
their estates.  Accordingly, the requested extension will allow the
Debtors the time to quantify allowed claims and to provide the
process to pay their creditors in full, which are necessary to
formulate a confirmable chapter 11 plan in an orderly manner which
will be of substantial benefit to the estate and the Debtors'
creditors.

                      About Fauser Oil Co.

Elgin, Iowa-based Fauser Energy Resources, Inc. --
http://www.fauserenergy.com/-- supplies and delivers propane and
fuel products to residential and commercial customers throughout
the Midwest region of the U.S.

Fauser Oil Co. Inc., Fauser Energy Resources Inc., Fauser Transport
Inc. and Ron's L.P. Gas Service LLC sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Iowa Lead Case No. 17-00466)
on April 24, 2017.  Paul Fauser, president, signed the petition.
On July 7, 2017, the Court entered an order jointly administering
all of the Debtors' Cases.

At the time of the filing, Fauser Energy estimated its assets and
debt at $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Thad J. Collins presides over the case.

Sweet DeMarb LLC serves as counsel to the Debtors, with the
engagement led by James D. Sweet, Esq., and Rebecca R. DeMarb, Esq.
Yara El-Farhan Halloush, Esq., of Halloush Law Office, P.C., is the
Debtors' local co-counsel.  Ravinia Capital LLC is the Debtor's
investment banker and financial advisor.

On May 12, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors for Fauser Oil.  No
creditors' committee has been appointed for the other Debtors.  The
Fauser Oil Committee retained Pepper Hamilton as legal counsel and
Cutler Law Firm, P.C., as associate counsel.


FINJAN HOLDINGS: Sues Juniper Networks for Patent Infringement
--------------------------------------------------------------
Finjan Holdings, Inc., has filed a patent infringement lawsuit
against Juniper Networks, Inc. a Delaware Company with headquarters
in Sunnyvale, California, in the U.S. Northern District of
California.

Finjan filed a Complaint (Case No. 5:17-cv-05659), on Sept. 29,
2017, and alleges that Juniper's products and services infringe
eight U.S. Finjan patents. Specifically, Finjan is asserting
infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,154,844; 6,804,780; 7,613,926;
7,647,633; 7,975,305; 8,141,154; 8,225,408; and 8,677,494.  Finjan
is seeking, among other things, a jury trial, past damages not less
than a reasonable royalty, injunctive relief, enhanced damages for
willful infringement, and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.

Finjan has pending infringement lawsuits and appeals against
FireEye, Inc., Symantec Corp., Palo Alto Networks, Blue Coat
Systems, Inc., ESET and its affiliates, Cisco Systems, Inc.,
SonicWall, Inc., and Bitdefender and its affiliates relating to,
collectively, more than 20 patents in the Finjan portfolio.  The
court dockets for the foregoing cases are publicly available on the
Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) website,
www.pacer.gov, which is operated by the Administrative Office of
the U.S. Courts.

                         About Finjan

Established nearly 20 years ago, Finjan -- http://www.finjan.com/
-- is a cybersecurity company.  Finjan's inventions are embedded
within a strong portfolio of patents focusing on software and
hardware technologies capable of proactively detecting previously
unknown and emerging threats on a real-time, behavior-based basis.
Finjan continues to grow through investments in innovation,
strategic acquisitions, and partnerships promoting economic
advancement and job creation.

Finjan reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$6.43 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, a net loss
attributable to common stockholders of $12.60 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015, and a net loss of $10.47 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2017, Finjan had $43.42 million in total assets,
$7.64 million in total liabilities, $18 million in Series A-1
preferred stock and $17.77 million in total stockholders' equity.

"Our cash requirements are, and will continue to be, dependent upon
a variety of factors.  We expect to continue devoting significant
capital resources to the litigations in process and any other
litigation we pursue.  We also expect to require significant
capital resources to maintain our issued patents, prosecute our
patent applications, acquire new technologies as part of our growth
strategy, and attract and retain qualified personnel on a full-time
basis," said the Company in its quarterly report for the period
ended June 30, 2017.


FIVE LOTS: Abbott Properties Secured Claim To Be Paid in Two Years
------------------------------------------------------------------
Five Lots LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Arizona its first amended Chapter 11 plan of reorganization
dated Sept. 18, 2017.

The Class III secured claim of Abbott Properties, LLC -- totaling
$7,649.52 plus postpetition attorneys' fees and costs -- are
impaired by the Plan.  Abbott's allowed claim will be $28,825,
accruing interest at a rate of 5% per annum, and will be secured by
the property located at 1007 E. Carefree Highway, in Phoenix,
Arizona.  The entire unpaid amount of Abbott's allowed claim will
be due and owing in full within 24 months after the Effective Date.
No periodic payments are required during the 24 months after the
Effective Date, there will be no prepayment penalty and payment
will be made through the sale of the collateral, refinancing,
payment from an insider, or from the sale of other estate assets.


If the reorganized debtor fails to make full payment within 24
months after the Effective Date, then Abbott Properties may
foreclose on its allowed claim, and Abbott Properties will be
entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs related to such
foreclosure in the agreed amount of $3,500 for an uncontested
foreclosure.

Abbott Properties will release its lien on Parcels 2 and 3 on the
Effective Date.  The allowed claim of Abbott Properties does not
include or provide for future attorney fees or costs associated
with its claim.  However, if the reorganized debtor fails to make
full payment of the allowed claim of Abbott Properties within 24
months after the Effective Date, then Abbott Properties may
commence foreclosure proceedings, in which case Abbott Properties
is entitled to recover its allowed claim plus attorneys' fees and
costs related to foreclosure in the agreed amount of $3,500.

A copy of the First Amended Plan is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb16-06224-224.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Dec. 13, 2016, the
Debtor filed with the Court a disclosure statement dated Nov. 28,
2016, referring to the Debtor's plan of reorganization, which
proposed that Class IV -- the $17,300 Unsecured Claims of Blair
Irish Hubbard & Erhart, PLC -- would be paid in full, without
interest, within 36 months of the Effective Date.

                      About Five Lots LLC

Five Lots LLC filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No.
16-06224) on June 1, 2016, Pro Se.  David Allegrucci, Esq., at
Allegrucci Law Office PLLC in Buckeye, Arizona, was appointed as
the Debtor's legal counsel on July 28, 2016.  David Allegrucci,
Esq., at Allegrucci Law Office, PLLC, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


FOLTS HOME: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended to February 11
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Diane Davis of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of New York, at the behest of Folts Home and Folts Adult
Home, Inc., extended the Debtors' exclusive periods within which to
file and solicit acceptances of their Chapter 11 plans through
February 11, and April 12, 2018, respectively.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtors asked the Court to extend their exclusive periods within
which to file and solicit acceptances of their Chapter 11 plans.

The primary purpose of the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases is to
implement the sale of the facilities as going concerns pursuant to
Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, and to address the
numerous significant claims that accrued prior to Oct. 1, 2013.
The Debtors sought this relief in light of their financial
inability to continue operating the facilities, the fact that they
have encountered operating losses since 2011, and their desire to
sell the facilities to a qualified purchaser who will protect the
health, safety and welfare of the Folts Home and FAH residents and
preserve the Debtors' long-standing mission to provide quality
residential healthcare to members of the Herkimer community.

On June 6, 2017, the Debtors conducted an auction sale of
substantially all of their assets under Section 363 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code.  The Debtors selected a successful bidder for the
assets and the Successful Bidder intends to purchase the Debtors'
businesses as going concerns.  On July 21, 2017, the Court entered
an Order approving the asset sale.

The Debtors anticipated that the asset sale to the successful
bidder will close during late 2017 or early 2018.  The Debtors will
continue to work with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, the New York State Department of Health, the Office of
the U.S. Trustee and HomeLife on all essential issues relating to
the asset sale, and the development of, what will most likely be, a
joint disclosure statement and liquidating Chapter 11 plans in
these cases.

The Debtors noted that their cases are complex, and involve, on a
consolidated basis, assets valued on the Petition Date at
approximately $20 million and liabilities totaling approximately
$25 million.  In addition, the Debtors said its counsel has been in
the process of preparing a joint disclosure statement and Chapter
11 plans for the Debtors which will involve input from counsel for
HUD, the DOH and the U.S. Trustee -- Counsel anticipated that the
disclosure statement and plans will be filed in September or
October 2017.

The Debtors' demonstrated progress in resolving issues that have
arisen since the Petition Date also justifies the requested
extension of the Debtors' Exclusive Periods. The Debtors have
worked with HUD, the DOH, their other prepetition secured
creditors, HomeLife, the Office of the U.S. Trustee and investment
banker CohnReznick Capital Markets Securities, LLC, on all issues
in order to ensure the proper administration of their cases.

The Debtors further told the Court that receiver HomeLife, on
behalf of the Debtors, have been paying the Debtors' post-petition
debts when due.  The fact that a debtor has sufficient liquidity to
pay its post-petition debts as they come due supports the granting
of an extension of the exclusive periods, because it suggests that
an extension will not jeopardize the rights of post-petition
creditors.  The Debtors, through HomeLife, will continue to pay
their undisputed post-petition debts as they come due and they
anticipate having sufficient liquidity due to the relevant cash
collateral orders to do so.

                        About Folts Home

Folts Home is a New York not-for-profit corporation and the owner
of a 163-bed long-term residential health care and rehabilitation
facility located at 100-122 North Washington Street, Herkimer, New
York.  In addition to long-term skilled nursing and residential
care, Folts Home provides memory care to residents with dementia,
palliative care and respite care and operates an adult day care
program.  Folts Home also offers rehabilitation services, like
physical, occupational and speech therapy, on both inpatient and
out-patient bases.  Currently, Folts Home has approximately 218
active employees.  Approximately 124 of the employees are
full-time, 60 are part-time and 34 employees are employed on a per
diem basis None of Folts Home's employees are represented by labor
unions.

Folts Adult Home, Inc. ("FAH"), also known as Folts-Claxton, is a
New York not-for-profit corporation and the owner of an 80-bed
adult residential center that was constructed in 1998 and is
located at 104 North Washington Street, Herkimer, New York.  FAH
residents reside in separate apartments and are provided services
like daily meals, laundry, housekeeping and medication assistance.
FAH has approximately 22 active employees.  Approximately 12 are
full-time employees and 10 are part-time employees.  None of FAH's
employees are represented by labor unions.

Folts Home and FAH currently have average daily censuses of 145 and
69, respectively.  Folts Home has 3 major payors: Medicare,
Medicaid and Excellus/Blue Cross.  The majority of FAH residents
are government subsidized, with 58% covered by Social Security
Insurance and 42% private pay.

Folts Home and Folts Adult Home, Inc., filed separate, voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the  Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-60139) on Feb. 16, 2017.  The
Hon. Diane Davis presides over the cases.  Stephen A. Donato, Esq.,
at Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, serves as the Debtors' counsel.

Folts Home and Folts Adult Home, Inc., through duly-appointed
receivers HomeLife at Folts, LLC and HomeLife at Folts-Claxton,
LLC, continue to operate their skilled nursing home and adult
residence businesses, respectively, and manage their properties as
debtors in possession.

William K. Harrington, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2, appointed
Krystal Wheatley as patient care ombudsman for the Debtors.


FORESIGHT ENERGY: Jeremy Harrison Named as General Partner's PFO
----------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Jeremy J. Harrison was appointed chief accounting officer of
Foresight Energy GP LLC, the general partner of Foresight Energy
LP, effective Sept. 30, 2017.  Additionally, the Board of Directors
of the General Partner has appointed Mr. Harrison as the principal
financial officer of the General Partner, also effective Sept. 30,
2017.  Concurrently with Mr. Harrison's appointment to these
positions, and as previously announced, Mr. James T. Murphy will
cease serving as the chief accounting officer and the principal
financial officer of the General Partner.

Mr. Harrison, age 36, has served as the chief accounting officer of
Murray Energy Corporation since August 2017.  Mr. Harrison
previously served as corporate controller of Murray from 2015 to
2017.  Prior to his position at Murray, Mr. Harrison was employed
as a senior manager at a regional public accounting firm.  Mr.
Harrison is a certified public accountant and holds a Bachelor of
Science in Business Administration and Masters of Business
Administration from John Carroll University.

There are no understandings or arrangements between Mr. Harrison
and any other person pursuant to which Mr. Harrison was appointed
principal financial officer.

                    About Foresight Energy

Foresight Energy L.P. mines and markets coal from reserves and
operations located exclusively in the Illinois Basin.  As of Dec.
31, 2015, the Company has invested over $2.3 billion to construct
state-of-the-art, low-cost and highly productive mining operations
and related transportation infrastructure.  The Company controls
over 3 billion tons of proven and probable coal in the state of
Illinois, which, in addition to making the Company one of the
largest reserve holders in the United States, provides organic
growth opportunities.  The Company's reserves consist principally
of three large contiguous blocks of uniform, thick, high heat
content (high Btu) thermal coal which is ideal for highly
productive long-wall operations.  Thermal coal is used by power
plants and industrial steam boilers to produce electricity or
process steam.

Foresight reported a net loss of $178.6 million in 2016 following a
net loss of $38.68 million in 2015.

As of June 30, 2017, Foresight Energy had $2.82 billion in total
assets, $1.94 billion in total liabilities and $872.04 million in
total partners' capital.

                          *     *     *

In March 2017, S&P Global Ratings said it affirmed its 'B-'
corporate credit rating on Foresight Energy L.P.  The rating
outlook is revised to stable from negative.

In March 2017, Moody's Investors Service upgraded Foresight Energy
L.P.'s Corporate Family Rating (CFR) to 'B3' from 'Caa1', and its
probability of default rating (PD) to 'B3-PD' from 'Caa1-PD'.  "The
upgrade reflects the improved industry conditions and the company's
solid contracted position, which drives Moody's expectations that
Debt/ EBITDA, as adjusted, will decline from 5.9x at September 30,
2016 to roughly 4.5x by the end of 2017", says Anna
Zubets-Anderson, the lead analyst for Foresight.

In March 2017, Fitch Ratings has assigned a first-time Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of 'B-' to Foresight Energy LP and
Foresight Energy LLC.  Foresight
Energy LLC's new senior secured first lien term loan and new
revolving credit facility ratings are 'B+/RR2' and the new second
lien notes rating is 'CCC/RR6'.  The facilities are to be
guaranteed by Foresight Energy LP.


GATES GLOBAL: Atlas Hydraulics Buy No Impact on Moody's B3 CFR
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service said that Gates Global LLC's (Gates, B3
CFR) acquisition of Ontario, Canada based Atlas Hydraulics Inc
(Atlas, unrated) is credit positive and does not affect the
company's ratings at this time. Atlas is primarily an assembler of
hydraudic hose and tubes for original equipment manufacturers.

Gates Global LLC, located in Denver, Colorado, is a leading global
manufacturer of power transmission belts and fluid power products
that are highly engineered and critical components used in diverse
industrial and automotive applications, with aftermarket revenue
representing approximately 60% of sales of about $2.8 billion as of
July 1, 2017. Gates is a portfolio company of The Blackstone Group
L.P.


GENWORTH HOLDINGS: Moody's Lowers Sr. Unsecured Debt Rating to B2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded the credit ratings of Genworth
Holdings, Inc. -- senior unsecured debt to B2 from Ba3, the
insurance financial strength (IFS) ratings of Genworth Life
Insurance Company (GLIC) and Genworth Life Insurance Company of New
York (GLICNY) to B2 from Ba3, and the IFS rating of Genworth Life
and Annuity Insurance Company (GLAIC) to Ba1 from Baa2. These
actions follow the announcement by Genworth Financial (Unrated,
Genworth), the ultimate parent of Genworth Holdings, on October 2,
2017 that it intends to refile its application with the Committee
on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and evaluate
options to address its upcoming debt maturities in the event the
transaction with China Oceanwide Holdings Group Co. Ltd. (COH;
unrated) is not completed.

The ratings of Genworth's US and Australian mortgage insurance (MI)
operations (Ba1 IFS rating, Positive; Baa1 IFS rating, stable,
respectively) are not part of this rating action. This is due to
the meaningful separation that exits between Genworth's life and
mortgage insurance businesses which mitigates the weaken financial
flexibility.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Ratings Rationale - The Holding Company

The ratings downgrade and continued review for downgrade of
Holdings and its life insurance subsidiaries is driven by
continuing delays in obtaining required regulatory approvals for
the planned acquisition of the company by COH which underline the
risks to consummation of the transaction. The downgrade also
reflects the need to develop alternative arrangements, absent a
transaction, to its upcoming debt maturing of approximately $2.1
billion between 2018 and 2021. While Genworth and COH have
indicated they remain committed to the transaction, the continued
review for downgrade reflects ongoing execution risk associated
with the closing of the transaction, as well as the company's
financial flexibility challenges. In addition, the repeated
withdrawal and refiling of the CFIUS application and the need to
secure other regulatory approvals increases the uncertainty of the
transaction being further delayed or completed. That said, the
Virginia State Corporation Commission's Bureau of Insurance
approved the proposed acquisition by COH in September 2017
conditioned upon the completion of the merger and receipt of all
other regulatory approvals.

Moody's notes Genworth has meaningful holding company resources,
including its stake in its global mortgage insurance operations and
net cash and investments of approximately $858 million at June 30,
2017. However, the company's ability to organically build
additional liquidity is mitigated by the modest dividend capacity
in aggregate from its insurance subsidiaries, relative to its debt
load. To address upcoming debt maturities in case the transaction
with COH does not close, Genworth is evaluating potential
refinancing alternatives, current holding company cash, and/ or
potential asset sales. Should the deal close, COH will provide
Genworth a cash infusion on or before maturity, to pay down the
$600 million of debt maturing in 2018.

Ratings Rationale - The Life Insurance Companies

The rating downgrade and the continued review for downgrade of GLIC
and its subsidiary GLAIC reflect both the uncertain financial
flexibility at Genworth (discussed above), and the continued
concern about the tail risk associated with the LTC business in
GLIC. While GLAIC has meaningful interest sensitivity associated
with its life and annuity business, Moody's believes it has a
stronger credit profile than GLIC and should release capital over
time, should the de-stacking take place. However, Moody's has left
both under review for downgrade to reflect the pressures they
face.

Moody's said the review will continue to focus, on the strategic
rationale of the acquisition of Genworth by COH, the necessary
regulatory approvals, progress related to the de-stacking, in terms
of regulatory approvals on the timing and contributions, on
definitive debt repayment decisions, and on business and financial
profile of the life insurance companies, in terms of earnings,
reserve adequacy, and regulatory capitalization.

RATING DRIVERS

Should the deal close, Moody's expects to confirm the ratings of
Genworth and its life insurance companies. If the deal closes and
the company demonstrates a path to address the 2020/2021 debt
maturities, there would be upward pressure on the ratings of
Genworth Mortgage Insurance Corporation (GMICO Ba1 IFS rating
positive), GLAIC and the holding company. If the deal does not
close, Moody's will evaluate the financial performance of the
businesses, the company's financial flexibility challenges and
progress the company has made in developing alternative
arrangements for addressing its upcoming debt maturities.

Rating Drivers -- Holding Company

Capital support to repay the 2018 and all or a portion of the 2020
and 2021 debt maturities at closing could lead to a confirmation or
upgrade of Genworth's ratings. Additionally, the following could
place upward pressure on the holding company's ratings: 1)
successful separation and isolation of the LTC business and
improvement of holding company financial flexibility through
increased dividend capacity; and 2) Improved credit profile of
GLAIC.

Conversely, the following could result in a downgrade of the
holding company's ratings: 1) further downgrade of the US life
insurance operations; 2) lack of progress in developing alternative
arrangements for its upcoming debt maturing between 2018 and 2021;
and 3) if the planned acquisition by COH is terminated or further
delayed.

Rating Drivers - US life insurance operating subsidiaries

The following factors could result in GLAIC's rating being
confirmed, and place upward pressure on the company over time: 1)
stability in statutory earnings and return on statutory surplus
greater than 6%, and 2) improvement in financial flexibility at the
holding company (i.e., reduction in and/or refinancing of 2018 and
2020/2021 debt maturities).

Conversely, factors that could result in a downgrade of GLAIC's
rating include: 1) Failure to maintain RBC > 325% of company
action level (CAL), 2) return on statutory surplus less than 4%,
and 3) if the planned acquisition by COH is terminated or further
delayed.

The following could lead to a confirmation of GLIC/GLICNY's
ratings, and place upward pressure on the ratings over time: 1)
significant LTC rate approvals and/or other actions that help grow
margins in the legacy LTC book of business, and 2) improvement in
financial flexibility at the holding company (i.e., reduction in
and/or refinancing of 2018 and 2020/21 debt maturities).

Factors that could result in a downgrade of GLIC's/GLICNY's ratings
include: 1) further deterioration of the margins on LTC reserves,
increasing the probability of a material reserve charge in the
future, 2) RBC ratio less than 300% CAL, and 3) denial of LTC rate
approvals, pressuring reserve adequacy of legacy LTC business.

The following ratings were downgraded and remain on review for
downgrade:

Genworth Holdings, Inc.: backed senior unsecured to B2 from Ba3,
backed junior subordinate to B3 (hyb) from B1 (hyb), backed
provisional senior unsecured shelf to (P) B2 from (P) Ba3, and
backed provisional subordinate shelf to (P) B3 from (P) B1;

Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company: insurance financial
strength to Ba1 from Baa2

Genworth Global Funding Trusts: funding agreement-backed senior
secured MTN notes to Ba1 from Baa2;

Genworth Life Insurance Company: insurance financial strength to B2
from Ba3;

Genworth Life Insurance Company of New York: insurance financial
strength to B2 from Ba3;

General Repackaging ACES SPC 2007- 7: funding agreement-backed
senior secured notes to B2 from Ba3;

The following rating was unaffected by this rating action and
remains with a stable outlook:

Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Limited: IFS rating at
Baa1.

The following rating was unaffected by this rating action and
remains with a positive outlook:

Genworth Mortgage Insurance Corporation: Insurance financial
strength at Ba1

Genworth Holdings is the intermediate holding company of Genworth
Financial, Inc., an insurance and financial services holding
company headquartered in Richmond, Virginia. The group reported
GAAP net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.'s common
shareholders of $357 million for the six months of 2017 on total
assets of $105 billion and shareholders' equity of $15 billion

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global life
Insurers published in April 2016.

Moody's insurance financial strength ratings are opinions of the
ability of insurance companies to pay punctually senior
policyholder claims and obligations.


GILDED AGE: Seeks Oct. 25 Extension of Plan Exclusivity Period
--------------------------------------------------------------
Gilded Age Properties, LLC, requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Rhode Island for a 25-day extension of:

     (a) the deadline to file a Disclosure Statement until
         October 25, 2017;

     (b) the Exclusivity Period to file a Reorganization Plan
         until October 25, 2017; and

     (c) the Solicitation Exclusivity Period through and
         including November 30, 2017.

On September 6, 2017, the Court entered an Order setting September
30, as the deadline for the Debtor to file its Reorganization Plan
and Disclosure Statement.

Keeping the best interest of its creditors and parties-in-interest
in mind, the Debtor relates it has taken steps to ensure the
success of its reorganization.  The Debtor tells the Court that it
has been working on its Reorganization Plan and Disclosure
Statement and intends to propose a bootstrap Reorganization Plan.

In order to be able to accurately form a Disclosure Statement and
test the feasibility of its Plan, the Debtor needs additional time
to prepare same.  The Debtor believes that extending the time to
file a Disclosure Statement and extending the exclusivity period to
file a Plan is in the best interest of Debtor's creditors and
parties in interest.

                    About Gilded Age Properties

Gilded Age Properties, LLC, owns and operates two properties: a
commercial rental property located at 117 Bellevue Avenue in
Newport, Rhode Island and a residential apartment building located
at 38-40 Freebody Street in Newport, Rhode Island.

Gilded Age Properties filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.R.I.
Case No. 17-10738) on May 4, 2017.  The petition was signed by
Peter M. Iascone, member.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities between $1 million and $10
million.

The case is assigned to Judge Diane Finkle.

The Debtor's counsel is William J. Delaney, Esq., at DarrowEverett
LLP, in Providence, Rhode Island.


GLOBAL EAGLE: S&P Withdraws Ratings on Insufficient Information
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew all of its ratings, including the 'B-'
corporate credit rating, on Los Angeles-based Global Eagle
Entertainment Inc.

The ratings withdrawal follows the further delay in the company's
financial reporting. As a result, S&P does not have sufficient
information to provide ongoing surveillance.


GOLDMAN SACHS: Fitch Affirms BB+ Preferred Equity Rating
--------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s
(Goldman) Long- and Short-Term Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) at
'A'/'F1', and Viability Rating (VR) at 'a'. The Rating Outlook is
Stable.

The rating affirmations have been taken in conjunction with Fitch's
periodic review of the Global Trading and Universal Banks (GTUBs).

KEY RATING DRIVERS
IDRs, VR, SENIOR DEBT, AND DERIVATIVE COUNTERPARTY

Goldman's ratings and Stable Outlook reflect the company's strong
franchise, differentiated risk management culture, strong capital
ratios, and solid liquidity position. Rating constraints include
Fitch's view of the cyclicality of the company's business model and
higher reliance on wholesale funding than some peer institutions.

Goldman's investment banking franchise continues to be very strong
and has consistently ranked near the top of league tables.

Goldman's ratings benefit from a strong market share in advisory,
though future results may be softer than in prior years due to
continued policy uncertainty. Additionally, Fitch expects
underwriting net revenue to remain solid, particularly as Goldman
continues to focus on growing its market share in debt
underwriting.

While Goldman has a strong market position in many trading
businesses, it is also noteworthy that results from trading have
been variable.

Over the last year Goldman's trading businesses have exhibited
variability driven largely by low market volatility, which has
adversely impacted Goldman's Fixed Income, Currency, and
Commodities (FICC) segment more so than peer banks during the first
two quarters of 2017. For example, in 2Q17, FICC net revenue was
40% lower than last year's second quarter due to significantly
lower net revenues in interest rate products, commodities, credit
products, and currencies only partially offset by higher net
revenues in mortgages.

Goldman's annualized return on equity (ROE) through the first half
of 2017 was 10.1%; however, excluding the benefit of a $485 million
reduction in the provision for taxes, Goldman's annualized ROE
through the first half of 2017 would have been 8.8%, still a good
result, but below the company's long-term averages.

Goldman has identified significant revenue opportunities to grow
revenue by $5 billion over the next three years. The biggest driver
of this strategy is additional lending and financing efforts,
followed by improvements in its FICC business and investment
management business. Depending on how well it is able to execute on
its lending and financing strategy as well as its investment
management strategy, Goldman could reduce a small proportion of the
variability in the company's operating results.

Goldman's capital ratios remain good, with the company's fully
phased-in Basel III Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio under the
advanced approaches at 12.2% at 2Q17. Goldman's Fitch Core Capital
(FCC) ratio as of 2Q17 was 12.5%. Goldman's reported CET1 is
in-line with GTUB peer medians, which Fitch views as appropriate
and supportive to the ratings.

Goldman's ratings also incorporate the company's more significant
reliance on wholesale funding than most other GTUBs, which have
funding profiles that are typically core in nature and skewed to a
larger proportion of low-cost and sticky retail deposit funding.

Fitch would note, however, that in April 2016 Goldman closed on the
purchase of General Electric's online deposit platform, which has
provided an avenue for future deposit growth. Total deposits have
grown over the last year and as of 2Q17 amount to $125.5 billion,
or 14% of total assets and 22% of total funding. However, this
proportion of deposit funding is below that of many peer
institutions.

Notably, Goldman is using some of its growing deposit funding for
its corporate lending portfolio as well as its recently launched
consumer lending platform, "Marcus By Goldman." This product, while
much smaller than the corporate loan portfolio, is Goldman's first
foray into consumer lending, although Fitch expects the level and
growth of these consumer loans to be very measured. Fitch does not
expect this segment to be a meaningful rating driver for some time
given its small size.

Fitch views Goldman's overall liquidity position as conservative.
Goldman's Global Core Liquid Assets (GCLA) was a solid $221
billion, or 24.4% of total assets.

DERIVATIVE COUNTERPARTY RATING

Fitch's derivative counterparty rating (DCR) on Goldman's parent
company, its main U.S. broker-dealer Goldman Sachs & Co. (GSCO),
and its main international broker-dealer Goldman Sachs
International (GSI), is equalized with Goldman's IDR for each
entity, reflecting Fitch's view that derivative counterparties to
Goldman will rank equally to other senior unsecured creditors.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

Subordinated debt and other hybrid capital issued by Goldman are
all notched down from the VR in accordance with Fitch's assessment
of each instrument's respective non-performance and relative loss
severity risk profile, which vary considerably. Subordinated debt
issued by the operating companies is rated at the same level as
subordinated debt issued by Goldman, reflecting the potential for
subordinated creditors in the operating companies to be exposed to
loss ahead of senior creditors in Goldman.

Goldman's subordinated debt is rated one-notch below Goldman's VR,
its preferred stock is rated five notches below the VR (which
encompasses two notches for non-performance and three notches for
loss severity), and its trust preferred stock is rated four notches
below the VR (encompassing two notches for non-performance and two
notches for loss severity).

LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS

U.S. deposit ratings of Goldman Sachs Bank USA (GSBUSA) are
one-notch higher than senior debt ratings of GSBUSA, reflecting the
deposits' superior recovery prospects in case of default given
depositor preference in the U.S.

Goldman Sachs International Bank's (GSIB) deposit ratings are at
the same level as their senior debt ratings because their
preferential status is less clear and disclosure concerning dually
payable deposits makes it difficult to determine if they are
eligible for U.S. depositor preference.

SUBSIDIARY AND AFFILIATED COMPANY

GSBUSA's Long-Term IDR benefits from an institutional Support
Rating of '1', which indicates Fitch's view that the propensity of
the parent company to provide capital support to the operating
subsidiaries is extremely high.

Additionally, the Long-Term IDRs for the material U.S. operating
entities, GSBUSA and the main broker dealer, Goldman Sachs & Co.
(GSCO), are rated one-notch above Goldman's Long-Term IDR to
reflect Fitch's belief that the U.S. single point of entry (SPOE)
resolution regime, the likely implementation of total loss
absorbing capacity (TLAC) requirements for U.S. global systemically
important banks (G-SIBs), and the presence of substantial holding
company debt, reduce the default risk of these domestic operating
subsidiaries' senior liabilities relative to holding company senior
debt.

Additionally, GSBUSA's 'F1' Short-Term IDR is at the lower of the
two potential Short-Term IDRs which map to an 'A' Long-Term IDR on
Fitch's rating scale, in order to reflect the company's greater
reliance on wholesale funding than more retail-focused banks.
GSCO's 'F1' Short-Term IDR reflects the view that there is less
surplus liquidity at this entity, particularly given its greater
reliance on the holding company for liquidity.

GSCO's senior secured debt ratings are equalized with the IDR of
the entity as Fitch does not have on-going visibility into the
collateral underlying the notes.

MATERIAL INTERNATIONAL SUBSIDIARIES

Goldman Sachs International (GSI) and GSIB are wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Goldman. Goldman's IDRs and debt ratings are
aligned with the bank holding company's ratings because of their
core strategic role in and integration into Goldman.

GSI's senior secured debt rating is equalized with the IDR of the
entity as Fitch does not have on-going visibility into the
collateral underlying the notes.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

Goldman's Support Rating (SR) and Support Rating Floor (SRF)
reflect Fitch's view that senior creditors cannot rely on receiving
extraordinary support from the sovereign in the event that Goldman
becomes non-viable. In Fitch's view, implementation of the Dodd
Frank Orderly Liquidation Authority legislation has now
sufficiently progressed to provide a framework for resolving banks
that is likely to require holding company senior creditors to
participate in losses, if necessary, instead of or ahead of the
company receiving sovereign support.

As previously noted, GSBUSA has a SR of '1', which reflects Fitch's
view of an extremely high probability of institutional support for
the entity. GSBUSA does not have a VR at this time, given Fitch's
view of its more limited role within the group structure.

RATING SENSITIVITIES
VR, IDRs, SENIOR DEBT, AND DERIVATIVE COUNTERPARTY RATING

In Fitch's view, Goldman's VR is solidly situated at its current
rating level and there is limited ratings upside. However, if the
company is able to further improve both its returns on equity and
the stability of its earnings profile while further reducing its
reliance on wholesale funding and maintaining above-peer-level
capital ratios, there could be some longer-term upside to the
company's ratings.

Downward pressure on the VR, though not expected could result from
a material loss and significant increase in leverage, or
deterioration in funding and liquidity levels. Similarly, any
unforeseen outsized or unusual fines, settlements or charges levied
could also have adverse rating implications, particularly if
permanent franchise damage is incurred as a result. Additionally,
any sizable risk management failure could result in negative
pressure on Goldman's ratings.

Additionally, and while not expected, if the company's operating
performance, as measured by return on equity, is below peers or the
company's historical averages for an extended period, this could
ultimately lead to negative ratings pressure over a longer-term
time horizon.

Fitch notes that Goldman, GSCO, and GSI's Long-term IDRs, senior
debt and DCR are equalized with the VR at the holding company.
Thus, Goldman's IDR, senior debt ratings and DCR would be sensitive
to any changes in Goldman's VR.

DERIVATIVE COUNTERPARTY RATING

DCRs are primarily sensitive to changes in the respective issuers'
Long-Term IDRs. In addition, they could be upgraded to one notch
above the IDR if a change in legislation creates legal preference
for derivatives over certain other senior obligations and, in
Fitch's view, the volume of all legally subordinated obligations
provides a substantial enough buffer to protect derivative
counterparties from default in a resolution scenario.

SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES

As noted, GSBUSA carries an institutional support rating of '1', as
Fitch believes support from the parent would be extremely highly
likely.

Additionally, GSBUSA and GSCO's Long-term IDRs are rated one-notch
higher than the parent holding company's IDR because each
subsidiary benefits from the structural subordination of holding
company TLAC, which effectively supports senior operating
liabilities of each subsidiary. Any change in Fitch's view on the
structural subordination of TLAC with respect to GSBUSA and GSCO
could also result in a change to each entity's Long-Term IDR.

MATERIAL INTERNATIONAL SUBSIDIARIES

GSI and GSIB's ratings are sensitive to the same factors that might
drive a change in Goldman's VR.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

Subordinated debt and other hybrid ratings are primarily sensitive
to any change in Goldman's VR and secondarily to a change in
Fitch's recovery expectations for such instruments.

LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS

GSBUSA's deposit ratings are sensitive to any change in the
entity's Long-Term IDR, which is sensitive to any change in the VR
of the parent company given the institutional support rating of
'1'. Thus, deposit ratings are ultimately sensitive to any change
in Goldman's VR or to any change in Fitch's view of institutional
support for GSBUSA.

GSIB's deposit ratings are sensitive to any change in its Long-Term
IDR, which is sensitive to any change in the VR of the parent
company given that Fitch has equalized GSIB's Long-Term IDR with
that of the parent company given its core nature in Goldman's
operations.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

SRs and SRFs would be sensitive to any change in Fitch's view of
support. However, since these ratings were downgraded to '5' and
'No Floor', respectively, in May 2015, there is unlikely to be any
change to these ratings in the foreseeable future.

GSBUSA's institutional support rating of '1' is sensitive to any
change in Fitch's views of potential institutional support for this
entity from the parent company.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
-- Long-Term IDR at 'A'; Stable Outlook;
-- Long-term senior debt at 'A';
-- Derivative Counterparty Rating at 'A(dcr)';
-- Viability Rating at 'a';
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F1';
-- Commercial paper at 'F1';
-- Support at '5';
-- Support Floor at 'NF';
-- Market linked securities at 'Aemr';
-- Subordinated debt at 'A-';
-- Preferred equity at 'BB+';
-- GS Finance Corp senior unsecured medium-term note program,
    series E at 'A'.

Goldman Sachs Bank, USA
-- Long-Term IDR at 'A+'; Outlook Stable;
-- Long-term senior debt at 'A+';
-- Long-term deposits at 'AA-';
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F1';
-- Short-term debt at 'F1';
-- Short-term deposits at 'F1+';
-- Support Rating at '1'.

Goldman, Sachs & Co.
-- Long-Term IDR at 'A+'; Outlook Stable;
-- Derivative Counterparty Rating at 'A+(dcr)';
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F1';
-- Long-term senior debt at 'A+';
-- Short-term debt at 'F1';
-- Senior secured long-term notes at 'A+'.
-- Senior secured short-term notes at 'F1'.

Goldman Sachs International
-- Long-term IDR at 'A'; Outlook Stable;
-- Derivative Counterparty Rating 'A(dcr)';
-- Short-term IDR at 'F1';
-- Senior secured long-term notes at 'A';
-- Senior secured short-term notes at 'F1';
-- Short-term debt at 'F1';
-- Long-term senior debt at 'A';
-- Senior market linked notes at 'Aemr'.

Goldman Sachs International Bank
-- Long-Term IDR at 'A'; Outlook Stable;
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F1'
-- Long-term deposits at 'A';
-- Short-term deposits at 'F1'.

Goldman Sachs AG
-- Long-Term IDR at 'A'; Outlook Stable;
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F1'.

Goldman Sachs Bank (Europe) plc
-- Long-term senior secured guaranteed debt at 'A';
-- Short-term senior secured guaranteed debt at 'F1';
-- Short-term debt at'F1'.

Goldman Sachs Paris Inc. et Cie.
-- Long-Term IDR at 'A'; Outlook Stable;
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F1'.

Goldman Sachs Financial Products I Limited
-- Long-term senior unsecured at 'A'.

Goldman Sachs Capital I
-- Trust preferred at 'BBB-'.

Goldman Sachs Capital II, III
-- Preferred equity at 'BB+'.

Goldman Sachs Finance Corp International LTD
-- Senior debt program at 'A'.


GOLFSMITH INTERNATIONAL: Has Until January 9 to File Ch. 11 Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware extended the periods during which
Golfsmith International Holdings, Inc. and its debtor affiliates
have the exclusive right to file a chapter 11 plan through January
9, 2018, and solicit acceptances of that plan through March 8,
2018.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on September 19, 2017,
the Debtors sought a 120-day extension of their exclusive periods.
Golfsmith said they commenced these chapter 11 cases with the
ultimate goal of implementing a value-maximizing transaction for
their creditor constituencies either through a stand-alone plan of
reorganization or a going-concern sale.  Their non-Debtor Canadian
affiliates operating as Golf Town also commenced a proceeding under
the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act in the Ontario Superior
Court of Justice in Canada.

According to Golfsmith, transitioning a large operation through the
stages of chapter 11 is a significant undertaking, and the Debtors
have done so while seeking to maximize the value of their assets
for the benefit of their stakeholders.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtors have made significant progress
in these chapter 11 cases by, among other things:

     (a) concluding store closing sales;

     (b) selling substantially all of their assets to Dick's
         Sporting Goods, Inc. and a contractual joint venture
         of Hilco Merchant Resources, LLC, Gordon Brothers
         Retail Partners, LLC, and Tiger Capital Group, LLC;

     (c) selling their corporate headquarters located in
         Austin, Texas;

     (d) rejecting or assuming and assigning, as the case may
         be, all of their unexpired leases of non-residential
         real property and executory contracts; and

     (e) obtaining critical post-petition debtor-in-possession
         financing to facilitate the foregoing restructuring
         strategies.

As a result of these efforts, the Debtors said they are now poised
to productively move forward with the next stage of these chapter
11 cases, including reviewing claims filed by various parties, and
preparing and consulting with constituent representatives regarding
exit strategies.

           About Golfsmith International Holdings, Inc.

Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Golfsmith International Holdings,
Inc., the parent company of Golfsmith International, Inc., is a
holding company.  The Company is a specialty retailer of golf and
tennis equipment, apparel, footwear and accessories.  The Company
operates as an integrated multi-channel retailer, providing its
customers the convenience of shopping in the retail stores across
United States, through its Internet site,
http://www.golfsmith.com/,and from its catalogs.

The Company offers a product selection that features national
brands, pre-owned clubs and its branded products. It offers a
number of customer services and customer care initiatives,
including its club trade-in program, 30-day playability guarantee,
115% low-price guarantee, its credit card, in-store golf lessons,
and SmartFit, its club-fitting program. As of Jan. 1, 2011, the
Company operated 75 stores in 21 states and 33 markets.

Golfsmith International Holdings, Inc., and 12 affiliates filed
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 16-12033) on Sept.
14, 2016.  The petitions were signed by Brian E. Cejka, chief
restructuring officer.  The Debtors are represented by Mark D.
Collins, Esq., John H. Knight, Esq., Zachary I. Shapiro, Esq., and
Brett M. Haywood, Esq., at Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., in
Wilmington, Delaware; and Michael F. Walsh, Esq., David N.
Griffiths, Esq., and Charles M. Persons, Esq., at Weil, Gotshal &
Manges LLP, in New York.

The Debtors' financial advisor is Alvarez & Marsal North America,
LLC. The Debtors' investment banker is Jefferies LLC.  The Debtors'
claims, noticing and solicitation agent is Prime Clerk LLC. Pope
Shamsie & Dooley LLP serves as tax accountants.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities
at $100 million to $500 million.

Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, on Sept. 23, 2016,
appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors.  The Committee hired Cooley LLP as lead
counsel, Chaitons LLP as Canadian counsel, Polsinelli PC as
Delaware counsel, Province, Inc. as financial advisor, and A&G
Realty Partners as real estate advisor.

                           *     *     *

In November 2016, Golfsmith received Bankruptcy Court approval to
sell its retail operations to a joint venture of Dick's Sporting
Goods and liquidators Hilco Global, Gordon Brothers and Tiger
Capital Group.  As widely reported, the deal is for $69 million and
will result in 30 stores remaining operational, while 59 will be
subject to going-out-of-business sales.

The company also has separately sold its Canadian assets, which
deal closed in early November.  The buyer has entered into a
transitional services agreement with Golfsmith to help manage the
Canadian business.

In January 2017, Golfsmith received court approval to sell its
corporate headquarters in Austin, Texas, for $22.5 million, to BH
Management Inc., the lone bidder for the property.


GRACE UNITED: Case Summary & 6 Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Grace United Community Church, Inc.
        901 NW 183rd Street
        Miami, FL 33169

Type of Business: Grace United Community Church, Inc. is
                  is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization
                  that owns in fee simple interest a church
                  located at 901 NW 183 rd Street, Miami, FL
                  33169 valued by the Company at $2.1 million.

Case No.: 17-22079

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 3, 2017

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Florida (Miami)

Judge: Hon. Jay A. Cristol

Debtor's Counsel: Samantha S Parchment, Esq.
                  PARCHMENT LAW, P.A.
                  3900 Hollywood Blvd, Suite 302
                  Hollywood, FL 33021
                  Tel: 786-597-7263
                  E-mail: info@parchmentlaw.com

Total Assets: $2.10 million

Total Liabilities: $2.17 million

The petition was signed by Dennis D. Archibald, director.

A full-text copy of the petition, along with a list of six
unsecured creditors, is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb17-22079.pdf


GREAT BASIN: Common Stock Delisted from OTCQB Market
----------------------------------------------------
Great Basin Scientific, Inc. received notice from the OTC Markets
Group that due to the Company's ongoing delinquency in the filing
of its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, which was due
on Aug. 14, 2017, the Company will be moved from the OTCQB market
to OTC Pink market before market opens on Monday, Oct. 2, 2017.

On Aug. 16, 2017, Great Basin disclosed in its Current Report on
Form 8-K that the Company was not able to timely file its quarterly
report on Form 10-Q.  On Sept. 28, 2017, the Company disclosed in
its Current Report on Form 8-K that the Company will not be able to
file its Form 10-Q by the Sept. 28, 2017, deadline to remain
eligible for trading on the OTCQB market.  

                      About Great Basin

West Valley City, Utah-based Great Basin Scientific Inc. --
http://www.gbscience.com/-- is a molecular diagnostics company
that commercializes breakthrough chip-based technologies.  The
Company is dedicated to the development of simple, yet powerful,
sample-to-result technology and products that provide fast,
multiple-pathogen diagnoses of infectious diseases.  The Company's
vision is to make molecular diagnostic testing so simple and
cost-effective that every patient will be tested for every serious
infection, reducing misdiagnoses and significantly limiting the
spread of infectious disease.

Great Basin reported a net loss of $89.14 million on $3.04 million
of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net
loss of $57.89 million on $2.14 million of revenues for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015.

As of March 31, 2017, Great Basin had $29.24 million in total
assets, $59.10 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $29.86 million.

The Company's independent accountants, BDO USA, LLP, in Salt Lake
City, Utah, expressed "substantial doubt" about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern noting that the Company has
incurred substantial losses from operations, has negative operating
cash flows and has a net capital deficiency.


GYMBOREE CORP: Completes Financial Restructuring; Exits Chapter 11
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Gymboree Corporation on Sept. 29, 2017, disclosed that it has
successfully completed its financial restructuring and emerged from
Chapter 11 as a new corporation under the name Gymboree Group, Inc.
(the "Company" or "Gymboree Group").  The Company's court-confirmed
Plan of Reorganization (the "Plan") went into effect Friday,
September 29, 2017.  With the support of its creditors and
stakeholders, Gymboree Group has substantially improved its
financial position and established a sustainable capital structure
by eliminating more than $900 million of debt from its balance
sheet and right-sizing its store footprint.

Gymboree Group's new competitive financial and operating structure
will allow the Company to invest in and grow the business over the
long term.  The Company has received an $85 million new term loan
from Goldman Sachs and access to a $200 million revolving credit
facility from Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Citizens.  Gymboree
Group's pre-petition term loan lenders -- including Searchlight,
Apollo Global Management, Oppenheimerfunds, Brigade Capital
Management, LP, Marblegate, Nomura Securities International and
Tricadia Capital Management, LLC -- are the Company's new owners.

"[Fri]day marks a new beginning for Gymboree Group as we emerge as
a stronger and more agile competitor in the children's apparel
market," said Daniel Griesemer, President and CEO of Gymboree
Group.  "With the support of our new equity owners, this process
has allowed us to secure the Company's long-term financial health,
and we are excited about the opportunities ahead as we turn our
full focus toward executing our strategic Product, Brand and
Omni-channel initiatives.  I want to thank our exceptional team at
Gymboree Group for their dedication and continued focus throughout
this process.  Looking ahead, our talented employees will continue
to drive our success as we deliver for our customers and put them
at the center of everything we do.  We are also grateful for the
support of our vendors and partners during this process, and we
look forward to working together well into the future."

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is serving as the Company's legal counsel,
AlixPartners LLP is serving as its financial advisor and Lazard is
serving as its investment banker.

Additional information regarding Gymboree Group's financial
restructuring, including court filings and information about the
claims process, are available at
https://cases.primeclerk.com/gymboree or by calling Gymboree
Group's claims agent, Prime Clerk, at 844-822-9233 (or 646-486-7945
for international calls) or by sending an email to
gymboreeinfo@PrimeClerk.com.

                    About The Gymboree Corp.

The Gymboree Corporation is a children's apparel retailer in North
America, with 1,291 retail stores as of Jan. 28, 2017, operating
under three brands: Gymboree; Janie & Jack (a higher-end offering
launched in 2002); and Crazy 8 (a value-oriented line launched in
2007).  The Company operates online stores at
http://www.gymboree.com/, http://www.janieandjack.com/and   
http://www.crazy8.com/          

In October 2010, Gymboree was acquired by Bain Capital Private
Equity, LP and certain of its affiliated investment funds or
investment vehicles managed or advised by it -- Sponsor -- for
approximately $1.8 billion.

The Gymboree Corp. and seven affiliates each filed a Chapter 11
voluntary petition (Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case No. 17-32986) on June
11, 2017.  James A. Mesterharm, chief restructuring officer, signed
the petitions.  The cases are pending before the Honorable Keith L.
Phillips.

Gymboree had $755.5 million in assets and $1.36 billion in total
liabilities as of March 14, 2017.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP, is the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  Kutak
Rock LLP is the Debtors' local bankruptcy counsel.  Munger, Tolles
& Olson LLP is the Debtors' special counsel.  Lazard Freres & Co.
LLC is the investment banker.  AlixPartners, LLP is the
restructuring advisor.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

Counsel to the Term Loan Agent and the DIP Term Loan Agent are
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP; and McGuireWoods LLP.
Rothschild & Co. also serves as advisor to the Term Loan Agent.

Bain Capital Partners is represented by Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP.

Counsel to the DIP ABL Administrative Agent are Morgan, Lewis &
Bockius LLP; and Hunton & Williams LLP.

Counsel to the DIP ABL Term Agent are Choate, Hall & Stewart LLP;
and Whiteford Taylor Preston, LLP.

The indenture trustee for the Debtors' senior unsecured notes is
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

Counsel to the ad hoc group of senior unsecured noteholders is Akin
Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP.

Judy A. Robbins, U.S. Trustee for Region 4, on June 22, 2017,
appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of Gymboree Corp.  Hahn
& Hessen LLP serves as lead counsel to the Committee, and Tavenner
& Beran, PLC, serves as local counsel.  Protiviti Inc. acts as
financial advisor to the Committee.


HUDSON HOSPITALITY: Seeks Authority to Obtain Credit, Use Cash
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hudson Hospitality Holdings, LLC, seeks authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut to obtain
unsecured credit in the amount up to $325,000 from Madeline
Penachio-Konigsberg, and allow the use of cash collateral with the
consent of 9 Whitehall Avenue Lender LLC.

The Debtor owns and operates a 147-room hotel in Mystic,
Connecticut. Madeline Penachio-Konigsberg is and has always been
the sole member of the Debtor. As a result, Ms. Konigsberg has a
personal interest in ensuring that Debtor continues to operate as a
hotel and maintain its value as the primary asset of the Debtor's
estate.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor was unable to meet its cash
needs without additional funding from Ms. Konigsberg. The
Court-appointed CRO, Matthew Walston, has been working with the
Debtor's manager and the Debtor's counsel to ensure that the Debtor
will have sufficient weekly cash flow to operate on a week-to-week
basis from room rentals and other services.

However, without funding from Ms. Konigsberg, the Debtor will not
have sufficient funds to operate the Hotel during the off season,
to maintain interest payments to 9 Whitehall Avenue Lender, and to
fund the sale process designed to maximize the assets of the
Estate. The Debtor asserts that Ms. Konigsberg has made emergency
loans to the Hotel since the Petition Date so that the Hotel would
continue to operate.

Thus, the Debtor now seeks to borrow funds from Ms. Konigsberg,
pursuant to the budget, in an amount up to $325,000. In addition to
the budgeted expenses, the Debtor is seeking to borrow funds for
post-petition interest payments to 9 Whitehall Avenue Lender that
have accrued since the commencement of the case but prior to
September 2017 and to pay the retainer of the real estate broker
and advisor retained by order of the Court.

The Budget provides total operating expenses of $383,088 during the
months of September through December 2017.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor mortgaged the Property at 9
Whitehall Avenue, Stonington, Connecticut to 9 Whitehall Avenue
Lender LLC, which was secured by a mortgage on the Property. As of
the Petition Date, 9 Whitehall Avenue Lender was owed approximately
$2,200,000.

Ms. Konigsberg has agreed to provide the Debtor with a commercial
line of credit promissory note, and the terms of the loan are as
follows:

     (a) Amount: up to $325,000;

     (b) Secured loan subordinate to any valid existing
pre-petition liens, specifically, to the Pre-Petition Mortgage;

     (c) Secured by: demand open-end mortgage deed on the Property
and Security Agreement against all personal property owned by the
Debtor;

     (d) Interest: The interest rate will be fixed at 6% per annum;
and

     (e) Maturity Rate: the earlier of (i) the sale of the
Property; (ii) conversion of the Debtor's case to case under
Chapter 7; (iii) the appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee; (iv)
dismissal of the case; or (v) September 30, 2018.

The Debtor asserts that the approval of the use of cash is in the
best interests of the Debtor, the estate, and creditors. The use of
cash collateral will enable the Debtor to pay post-petition
obligations and preserve the integrity of its operations while it
continues to provide its customary service to hotel guests. Absent
the use of cash collateral, the Debtor's ability to continue its
operations in the ordinary course would be jeopardized.

The Property is currently valued at approximately $4,000,0000.
Thus, 9 Whitehall Avenue Lender's interest in the Cash Collateral
is protected by the equity cushion on the Property. As additional
adequate protection on the Property, the Debtor will make interest
payments to 9 Whitehall Avenue Lender at the contract rate.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb17-20717-62.pdf

The Budget is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb17-20717-62-bgt.pdf

               About Hudson Hospitality Holdings

Hudson Hospitality Holdings, LLC, owns and operates a 147-room
hotel in Mystic, Connecticut.  

Hudson Hospitality filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
D. Conn. Case No. 17-20717) on May 17, 2017.  The petition was
signed by Madeline Penachio-Konigsberg, sole member.

The Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and
liabilities.

The Hon. James J. Tancredi presides over the case.  

Zeisler & Zeisler PC serves as counsel to the Debtor.  Matthew J.
Walston of Walston & Ignagni, PC, is the Debtor's Chief
Restructuring Officer.

No trustee, examiner, or committee has been appointed in the
Debtor's chapter 11 cases.


ILLINOIS COMPOUNDING: Dolan Buying Operating Assets for $375K
-------------------------------------------------------------
Central Illinois Compounding, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Central District of Illinois to authorize the sale of
operating assets to Corey Dolan for $375,000.

Historically, the Debtor's sales have been steady, annually
exceeding over $1 million.  Unfortunately, however, the Debtor
experienced a flood of its premises when contractors struck a water
main.  The result was that the Debtor lost use of a large portion
of its premises which hurt revenue.  Further, its insurance company
denied its insurance claim.  The Debtor also experienced a loss in
revenue as a result of Caterpillar changing its health insurance
for its employees.  These events had a significant impact on the
Debtor's profitability.

The Debtor filed the Chapter 11 Case in order to ensure that it
will be able to provide uninterrupted top-tier service to its
customers while maximizing value by, among other things, working to
effectuate a "going concern" sale of its assets.  To that end, the
Debtor has entered into an asset purchase agreement on Sept. 29,
2017 with the Buyer.

The primary terms of the APA are:

     a. Buyer: Corey Dolan

     b. Seller: Central Illinois Compounding, Inc. doing business
as Preckshot Professional Pharmacy;

     c. Purchase Price: $375,000

     d. Deposit: $10,000

     e. Acquired Assets: The Seller desires to sell and the Buyer
desires to purchase the operating assets of Seller being generally
described as the Seller's tangible personal property, including,
but not limited to equipment and inventory, all formulas and
processes for compounding, entire database, furniture, fixtures,
telephone numbers, including all cellular phones and cellular phone
numbers for employees, being (309) 679-2047, (309) 679-2054, (855)
PRECKSHOT, facsimile numbers, being (309) 679-2051 and 966-1716,
Web site http://www.preckshot.com/, domain name, e-mail addresses,
leasehold improvements and intangibles, including but not limited
to goodwill, business name and customer lists, customer records,
files and medical forms, free of any liens, encumbrances and
obligations.

     f. The Buyer is only assuming liabilities that it chooses to
assume that relate to the acquired assets.

     g. The closing will occur not less the fourteen days and not
more the 28 days after satisfaction of all conditions precedent.

     h. The sale is subject to approval of the Court.

The Buyer has also reached an agreement with the Debtor's Landlord
to keep the pharmacy in its current location.  The Buyer has sent
its Letter of Intent ("LOI") to the Landlord.

The Debtor believes that the Secured Parties will consent to the
sale of the assets as described.  Accordingly, the Debtor asks that
the Sale Order provides for the transfer of the acquired assets to
the buyer free and clear of any claims and interests.

A copy of the APA and the LOI attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Central_Illinois_115_Sales.pdf

To maximize value for secured creditors, the Debtor believes that
it is crucial to quickly realize some value for its remaining
customer relationships and equipment -- assets that will not be
enhanced by a long stay in chapter 11.  The Debtor has identified
the Buyer as the most likely buyer for the assets, and the
agreement reflected in the APA is the result of arms-length
negotiations designed to achieve the highest possible price for the
assets under the circumstances.  Accordingly, the Debtor asks the
Court to approve the relief sought.

The Debtor asks the Court to waive the 14-day stay imposed by
F.R.B.P. Rule 6004(h), to the extent applicable, as the exigent
nature of the relief sought justifies immediate relief.

The Purchaser:

         Corey Dolan
         E-mail: corey@admedigitalmedia.com

The Purchaser is represented by:

         James W. Benckendorf, Esq.
         BENCKENDORF & BENCKENDORF, P.C.
         100 N. Main Street
         Morton, IL 61550

             About Central Illinois Compounding

Central Illinois Compounding, Inc., doing business as Preckshot
Professional Pharmacy -- http://www.preckshot.com/-- is a pharmacy
in Peoria, Illinois.  It is co-owned by Jennifer Siefert (51%) and
Wade Siefert (49%).

Central Illinois Compounding filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. C.D. Ill. Case No. 17-81031) on July 17, 2017,
estimating its assets and liabilities at between $1 million and $10
million.  The petition was signed by Jennifer Siefert, its
president.

Judge Thomas L. Perkins presides over the case.

Casey Christopher Kepple, Esq., at Kepple Law Group, LLC, serves as
the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


JASON MAZZEI: Proposed Sale of Meadville Property Dismissed
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Gregory L. Taddonio of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Pennsylvania dismissed Jason J. Mazzei's
proposed sale of commercial building located at 221-223 Chestnut
Street, Meadville, Pennsylvania 16335, with a tax ID number of
20-H-9, to Frank R. and Marilyn J. Mance for $100,000 for failure
to prosecute.

The Debtor's request to continue the sale hearing from Sept. 28,
2017 at 10:30 a.m. to Oct. 12, 2017 at 10:30 a.m. is denied as
moot.

Jason Mazzei is a licensed real estate agent currently conducting
business at 416 East Second Avenue, Tarentum, Pennsylvania.  Mr.
Mazzei sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No.
16-24827) on Dec. 30, 2016.  The Debtor tapped Albert G. Reese, Jr,
Esq., at Law Office of Albert G. Reese, Jr.


JOHN FUCHS: Darvishes Buying Pacific Palisades Property for $3.4M
-----------------------------------------------------------------
John Fuchs asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District
of California to authorize the bidding procedures in connection
with the sale of residential real property commonly known as 17726
Calle de Palermo, Pacific Palisades, California and personal
property items located therein, to Joanna Darvish and Elan Darvish
for $3,395,000, subject to overbid.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Oct. 24, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.
Objections, if any, must be filed no less than 14 days prior to the
hearing date.

The Debtor was forced to file his voluntary petition under chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code, to avoid an immediate foreclosure sale
of the Property, so that it could be marketed and sold.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor owned, in fee simple with
his wife, Robyn R. Fuchs, the Property.  The Debtor scheduled the
Property as jointly owned by the Debtor and his spouse.  While he
avers that the Property is owned as community property despite the
"joint tenancy" designation on title, the Debtor has secured the
consent of Mrs. Fuchs to the sale, and she has signed the
California Residential Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow
Instructions for the sale and purchase of the Property.  

The Property is encumbered by three deeds of trust, three tax liens
and a judgment lien.  The Debtor has made a settlement offer to the
first trust deed lender, Specialized Loan Servicing, on behalf of
The Bank of New York Mellon, and is awaiting a response.  The
Debtor expects to be able to reach an agreement to pay this lien
for less than the amount in the Proof of Claim, which is
$1,648,975, because he has affirmative claims against this lender
for violation of the California Homeowner Bill of Rights and
attempted wrongful foreclosure that are presently being litigated
in state court.

If the Debtor is able to reach an agreement for payment of a
discounted amount with Specialized Loan Servicing and the lender,
the Debtor expects to satisfy this lien from the proceeds of sale
and dismiss the state court litigation.  If the parties are unable
to reach an agreement, he expects to file an Objection to the Proof
of Claim or a separate Adversary Proceeding.

The Debtor is also in discussion with the second trust deed lender,
in an effort to resolve this lien for less than the amount claimed,
which is approximately $625,000.  The Debtor has offered to pay a
discounted amount, and counsel for the lender has indicated an
interest in reaching an agreement for less than the amount claimed
to be owed, but the parties have not yet reached an agreement.
Once an agreement is reached, the Debtor expects to satisfy this
lien from the proceeds of sale.

The Debtor has reached an agreement with the third trust deed
lender, Dawn M. Miller O.D. Retirement Trust, to pay this lien from
the proceeds of the sale, in the amount of $222,429, as set forth
in the Trust's Proof of Claim filed on Aug. 23, 2017, which amount
has been reduced from an original claim of $311,000, provided that
escrow closes by Nov. 30, 2017.  The Purchase Agreement presently
provides for the close of escrow on Nov. 10, 2017.

The California Franchise Board has filed a Proof of Claim in the
amount of $20.  The Debtor has no idea what this claim represents,
but it will be paid by escrow from the proceeds of sale.

The Los Angeles County Treasurer & Tax Collector has filed a proof
of claim for estimated property taxes in the amount of $13,381.  

The taxes on the Property have been paid for the 2016-2017 tax
year, and the first installment of the property taxes for the tax
year 2017-2018 is not due until December 10th.  The Debtor expects
that escrow will calculate the pro-rated amount due through the
date of closing and will pay the amount due from the proceeds of
the sale.

The Internal Revenue Service has filed a Proof of Claim in the
amount of $164,106, allegedly representing past due business and
personal taxes.  The Debtor is disputing the amount sought, because
certain of the 940 and 941 taxes from his law firm, in an amount
believed to be at least $50,000, were in fact paid in 2014, through
the law firm's payroll service, ADP, but the payment appears not to
have been credited by the IRS.  The Debtor also believes that
amounts in excess of $15,000 were paid by levy on bank accounts but
also have not been credited to the Debtor.

The Debtor has been directed to the representative of the IRS who
deals with taxes at issue in a bankruptcy proceeding.  He expects
to reach an agreement to resolve this claim within 60 days and will
either pay the agreed amount or will file an Objection to the Proof
of Claim or a separate Adversary Proceeding.

The Debtor was informed that the Judgment Lien recorded in the
amount of $58,978, representing an attorney fee award in prior
litigation, has been sold to an entity known as JSC Pacific.  At
least $5,000 has been paid against that lien that was not credited
by the judgment creditor or the assignee of the judgment.  The
Debtor has been in contact with the attorney for the creditor and
expects to reach an agreement to pay this judgment lien for less
than the amount claimed to be due.  If no agreement is reached, he
intends to file an Objection to the Proof of Claim or a separate
Adversary Proceeding.

The Proposed Buyers have offered to purchase the Property for
$3,395,000, $101,850 of which will be deposited into escrow within
48 hours after entry of the Order Approving the Sale.  The purchase
of the Property is also subject to the terms and conditions of the
Purchase Agreement.  The Escrow will close on Nov. 10, 2017.

The Property is being sold on an "as is, where is" basis, with no
warranties, recourse, contingencies, or representations of any
kind; and free and clear of all liens, claims, and interests, with
such liens, claims, and  interests to attach to the sales proceeds
in the same manner and priority as under applicable law.  The sale
is subject to overbid at the hearing on the Motion.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Initial Overbid: At least $25,000 more than the current
selling price of $3,395,000 or $3,420,000

     b. Overbid Deadline: Oct. 23, 2017 at 12:00 p.m. (PDT)

     c. Deposit: $101,850

     d. Auction: An auction will be conducted at the Oct. 24, 2017
at 11:00 a.m. hearing on the Motion.

     e. Bid Increments: $25,000
     
A copy of the Purchase Agreement attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/John_Fuchs_44_Sales.pdf

Assuming the Court approves the Purchase Agreement and no overbids
are received, the Debtor proposes to authorize the following
distributions of the sale proceeds from escrow: (i) $222,429 the
Trust, to satisfy the third trust deed lien; (ii) the pro-rated
amount of property taxes for the first half of the 2017-2018 tax
year, up to the amount of the Claim, $13,381; (iii) $20 to the
Franchise Tax Board; (iv) Real estate commissions to Christina
Arechaederra and Keith Craven of Keller-Williams in the Palisades,
California, expected to be about $170,000; and (v) Escrow fees,
title fees and other normal closing fees in an amount expected to
be at least $5,000.

The balance of the proceeds, which is expected to be about
$2,990,000, will be deposited into the Debtor's DIP account or into
a separate interest bearing account, in the name of the DIP, to be
held pending a resolution of all of the secured claims.

The facts reflect that the Debtor's decision to sell the Property
is supported by sound business judgment because the price is fair
and the sale will generate significant cash proceeds for the
Estate.  The sale price of $3,395,000 will net approximately
$400,000 to the Estate, after paying the liens currently secured by
the property, for payment of unsecured claims which are obligations
of the Estate.  This constitutes a sound business purpose and the
sale should be approved.  Accordingly, the Debtor asks the Court to
approve the relief sought.

The Debtor asks that the Court waives the 14-day stay period
provided under Rule 6004(h).

The Purchasers:

          Elan and Joanna Darvish
          10607 Rochester Ave.
          Los Angeles, CA 90024
          Telephone: (310) 234-4050

Counsel for the Debtor:

          John R. Fuchs, Esq.
          Gail S. Gilfillan, Esq.
          FUCHS LAW FROUP, APC
          12100 wILSHIRE bLVD., Ste 800
          Los Angeles, CA 90025-7140
          Telephone: (310) 826-9700
          E-mail: jrfuchs@earthlink.net
                  ggilfil@hotmail.com

John Fuchs sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
17-17199) on June 13, 2017.  The Debtor is represented by John R.
Fuchs, Esq., at Fuchs Law Group, APC.


KNIGHT ENERGY: U.S. Trustee Appoints 3 More Committee Members
-------------------------------------------------------------
Henry Hobbs, Jr., acting U.S. trustee for Region 5, on Oct. 2
appointed three more creditors to serve on the official committee
of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of Knight Energy
Holdings, LLC and its affiliates.

The new committee members are:

     (1) American Eagle Logistics, LLC
         1247 Petroleum Parkway
         Broussard, LA 70508

     (2) National Oilwell Varco & Affiliates
         7909 Parkwood Circle Drive
         Houston, TX 77036

     (3) Quail Tools, Incorporated
         P.O. Box 10739
         New Iberia, LA 70562-0739
  
The bankruptcy watchdog had earlier appointed NLB Corp. and EDI
Environmental Services, Inc., court filings show.

                 About Knight Energy Holdings, LLC

Knight Energy Holdings, LLC, supplies rental equipment and services
for drilling, completion and well control activities, serving a
diverse base of oil and gas operators.  It is a multi-basin service
provider with operations in nine states. Its services are available
to clients in the United States, including the Permian, Eagle Ford,
San Juan, Bakken, Cotton Valley, DJ, Haynesville, Alaska, and the
Gulf Coast.

In the past, Knight Energy also provided services internationally
in Norway, the Netherlands, Iraq, UAE, Australia, and Colombia.
There are presently no international operations. Knight Energy
currently employs approximately 330 employees spread throughout the
18 active locations.

Knight Energy, formerly Knight Oil Tools, LLC and its affiliates,
filed Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. W.D. La. Lead Case No. 17-51014)
on Aug. 8, 2017. The petitions were signed by Kelley Knight
Sobiesk, member, director.

At the time of filing, Knight Energy Holdings had $50 million to
$100 million in estimated assets and $100 million to $500 million
in estimated liabilities.

The cases are assigned to Judge Robert Summerhays.

Heller, Draper, Patrick, Horn & Dabney, LLC serves as bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtors while Opportune, LLP, serves as their crisis
manager. Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc. is the claims, noticing and
solicitation agent.

On August 24, 2017, Henry G. Hobbs, Jr., acting U.S. trustee for
Region 5, appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors.
The Committee hires Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz,
PC, as counsel.


LABELLE TRADING: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
---------------------------------------------------------
An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of LaBelle Trading Post, LLC, as
of Oct. 2, according to a court docket.

               About Labelle Trading Post, LLC

LaBelle Trading Post, LLC listed its business as a single asset
real estate. LaBelle owns a fee simple interest in a property
located at 10 Hickpoochee Avenue Labelle, Florida, with a current
value of $1.4 million.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-05098) on June 13, 2017. Oqab
Abuoqab, manager, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $1.4 million in
assets and $2.87 million in liabilities.

Richard Johnston, Jr., Esq., at Johnston Law, PLLC, serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor hired Downtown Business
Services as its accountant.


LEHMAN BROTHERS: 13th Distribution to Creditors Total $2.4 Billion
------------------------------------------------------------------
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. ("LBHI"), as Plan Administrator, on
Sept. 28, 2017, announced in a court filing the percentage recovery
that will be distributed on October 5, 2017 to holders of allowed
claims against LBHI and its various affiliated Debtors
(collectively, "Lehman").

Lehman's aggregate thirteenth distribution to unsecured creditors
pursuant to its confirmed chapter 11 plan will total approximately
$2.4 billion.  This distribution includes (1) $1.6 billion of
payments on account of third-party claims, which includes
non-controlled affiliate claims, and (2) $0.8 billion of payments
among the Lehman Debtors and their controlled affiliates (see
Exhibit B to the court filing, Docket #56298, for further detail).
Cumulatively through the thirteenth distribution, Lehman's total
distributions to unsecured creditors will amount to approximately
$119.0 billion including (1) $87.6 billion of payments on account
of third-party claims, which includes non-controlled affiliate
claims and (2) $31.4 billion of payments among the Lehman Debtors
and their controlled affiliates.

In accordance with the chapter 11 plan, which was confirmed on
December 6, 2011, and subject to available funds, the Lehman
Debtors' fourteenth distribution to creditors is anticipated to be
made within 5 business days of March 30, 2018.

The chapter 11 plan, related disclosure statement and other
filings, including the filing referred to above, can be found at
www.lehman-docket.com in the "Key Documents" section.  Questions
relating to the distribution can be directed to the Debtors' claims
agent, Epiq Systems, Inc., at 1-866-879-0688 (U.S.) and
1-503-597-7691 (Non-U.S.).

                      About Lehman Brothers

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. -- http://www.lehman.com/-- was the
fourth largest investment bank in the United States.  For more than
150 years, Lehman Brothers has been a leader in the global
financial markets by serving the financial needs of corporations,
governmental units, institutional clients and individuals
worldwide.

Lehman Brothers Holdings filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 08-13555) on Sept. 15, 2008.  Lehman's bankruptcy
petition disclosed US$639 billion in assets and US$613 billion in
debts, effectively making the firm's bankruptcy filing the largest
in U.S. history.  Several other affiliates followed thereafter.

Affiliates Merit LLC, LB Somerset LLC and LB Preferred Somerset LLC
sought for bankruptcy protection in December 2009.

The Debtors' bankruptcy cases were assigned to Judge James M. Peck.
Judge Shelley Chapman took over the case after Judge Peck retired
from the bench to join Morrison & Foerster.

A team of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, lawyers led by the late
Harvey R. Miller, Esq., serve as counsel to Lehman.  Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions serves as claims and noticing agent.

Dennis F. Dunne, Esq., Evan Fleck, Esq., and Dennis O'Donnell,
Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, in New York, served
as counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.
Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Capital, Inc., served as the
Committee's investment banker.

On Sept. 19, 2008, the Honorable Gerard E. Lynch of the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York, entered an
order commencing liquidation of Lehman Brothers, Inc., pursuant to
the provisions of the Securities Investor Protection Act (Case No.
08-CIV-8119 (GEL)).  James W. Giddens was appointed as trustee for
the SIPA liquidation of the business of LBI.  He is represented by
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP.

The Bankruptcy Court approved Barclays Bank Plc's purchase of
Lehman Brothers' North American investment banking and capital
markets operations and supporting infrastructure for US$1.75
billion.  Nomura Holdings Inc., the largest brokerage house in
Japan, purchased LBHI's operations in Europe for US$2 plus the
retention of most of employees.  Nomura also bought Lehman's
operations in the Asia Pacific for US$225 million.

Lehman emerged from bankruptcy protection on March 6, 2012, more
than three years after it filed the largest bankruptcy in U.S.
history.  The Chapter 11 plan for the Lehman companies other than
the broker was confirmed in December 2011.

                          *     *     *

In October 2016, the team winding down LBHI paid $3.8 billion to
creditors, the 11th distribution since Lehman's collapse in 2008.
This brought the total payout to more than $113.6 billion.
Bondholders were projected to receive about 21 cents on the dollar
when Lehman's bankruptcy plan went into effect in early 2012.  The
11th distribution raised the bondholders' recovery to more than 40
cents on the dollar and recoveries for general unsecured creditors
of Lehman's commodities to 79 cents on the dollar.  Lehman's
aggregate 12th distribution to unsecured creditors pursuant to its
confirmed Chapter 11 plan will total approximately $3.0 billion.


LEXINGTON HOSPITALITY: Wants to Extend Use of Cash Collateral
-------------------------------------------------------------
Lexington Hospitality Group LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District Court of Kentucky for authority to use cash
collateral on an extended basis through October 31, 2017 as set
forth on the budget, on an emergency basis.

The Debtor states that access to cash collateral is necessary to
ensure continued going-concern operations and to protect and
preserve the value of the Debtor's assets and ongoing operations.

The Budget provides departmental expenses in the aggregate amount
of $121,228 for the month of September 2017 and $142,677 for the
month of October 2017. It also provides fixed expenses of $5,500
for the month of September 2017 and $23,000 for October 2017.

The Debtor and Cash Collateral Creditor were not able to reach
agreement on the existing October budget. The Debtor believes that
the Cash Collateral Creditor is protected by an equity cushion
based on the most recent appraisal. The Debtor, however, is willing
to negotiate additional adequate protection payments with Cash
Collateral Creditor.

Further, the Debtor requests that there be carve-out for U.S.
Trustee fees in the budget and for accounting fees (subject to
employment application) as these are necessary expenses. The Debtor
asserts that payment of these fees will be necessary to continue
this bankruptcy proceeding. Payment of U.S. Trustee fees is
required in the case. The 2016 tax returns need to be prepared and
since the Cash Collateral Creditor is an insider it will benefit
from the tax return preparation.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion dated Sept. 26, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/33lP7x

                  About Lexington Hospitality

Headquartered in Aurora, Illinois, Lexington Hospitality Group LLC
-- http://www.clarionhotellexingtonky.com/-- owns the Clarion
Hotel Conference Center South, a hotel located at 5532 Athens
Boonesboro Road Lexington, Kentucky, known as Clarion Hotel
Conference Center South.  The Hotel, located in the heart of the
bluegrass and 'Horse Capital of the World,' has 149 well-appointed
guest rooms, an indoor heated pool and hot tub, a seasonal outdoor
pool, a fitness center and an on-site restaurant and bar.

Lexington Hospitality filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. E.D. Ky. Case No. 17-51568) on Aug. 3, 2017, estimating its
assets and liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million each.
The petition was signed by Kenneth Moore/Janee Hotel Corporation,
manager.

Judge Gregory R. Schaaf presides over the case.  

Laura Day DelCotto, Esq., Jamie L. Harris, Esq., and Sara A.
Johnston, Esq., at Delcotto Law Group PLLC, serve as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


LITTLEMOON: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
---------------------------------------------
Debtor: Littlemoon, a California corporation
           aka Littlemoon
        17777 Center Court Drive, Ste. 659
        Cerritos, CA 90703
        Tel: (213)880-6119

About the Debtor: Littlemoon's principal assets are located
                  at 1755 Rohr Street, Glendale, CA, 91202.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 3, 2017

Case No.: 17-22148

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Debtor's Counsel: Marvin Levy, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF MARVIN LEVY
                  11806 Moorpark St #G
                  Studio City, CA 91604
                  Tel: 818-298-4073
                  Fax: 818-761-1984
                  E-mail: l-levy@sbcglobal.net

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Dana Park, president.

The Debtor said it has no unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-22148_petition.pdf


MAINEGENERAL MEDICAL: Moody's Lowers Rating on $280MM Debt to Ba3
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgrades MaineGeneral Medical Center's
(MGMC's) rating to Ba3 from Ba2 with a stable outlook, affecting
about $280 million of rated debt.

The downgrade reflects a recurrence in margin and liquidity
deterioration in FY 2017, following improved performance in FY
2016. Management does not expect some of the factors contributing
to recent weak performance to recur. However, this fluctuation in
performance highlights difficulties that MGMC will have in
sustaining operating improvements as well as improved headroom
under its covenants. The Ba3 rating reflects the hospital's high
leverage, weak liquidity and very limited covenant cushion. The
rating also incorporates MGMC's leading market position and
moderate capital needs given the recent opening of a replacement
hospital.

Rating Outlook

The stable outlook reflects Moody's views that management will be
able to address challenges so that operating performance, liquidity
and covenant headroom will improve somewhat.

Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

- Demonstrated ability to achieve and sustain operating cashflow
   margin improvement

- Sizable increase in liquidity

- Greater headroom under financial covenants

- Deleveraging of balance sheet, resulting in improved debt
   metrics

Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade

- Failure to show sustained improvement in margins and liquidity

- Failure to show sustained improvement in covenant headroom

- Higher leverage

- Additional physician losses or volume declines

- Evidence of additional reimbursement constraints

Legal Security

Bonds are secured by a pledge of gross receipts of the Obligated
Group, a mortgage lien on the main campus, and a debt service
reserve fund. As additional security, there is a surety bond for
$15 million secured by the Harold Alfond Foundation. The Obligated
Group includes MaineGeneral Health, MaineGeneral Medical Center,
MaineGeneral Community Care, MaineGeneral Rehabilitation and Long
Term Care, and MaineGeneral Retirement Community.

Use of Proceeds

Not applicable

Obligor Profile

MaineGeneral Health is comprised of two campuses; MaineGeneral
Medical Center's Alfond Center for Health which provides inpatient
and outpatient services and the Thayer Center for Health in
Waterville, which provides outpatient care and a 24/7 Emergency
Department. MaineGeneral also operates home care and community
mental health services, long-term care facilities, physician
practices, and senior housing through its subsidiaries.

Methodology

The principal methodology used in this rating was Not-For-Profit
Healthcare Rating Methodology published in November 2015.


METRO HOUSING: Seeks 90-Day Extension of Plan Exclusivity Period
----------------------------------------------------------------
Metro Housing Project LLC requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Maryland for a 90-day extension of the exclusive
periods to file and to seek acceptance of a Plan of
Reorganization.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtor has taken significant steps
toward a successful reorganization, including but not limited to:

     (1) preparing and filing the Schedules and Statements;

     (2) attending the Initial Debtor Interview and 341 Meeting
         of Creditors;

     (3) filing an Application to Employ Counsel;

     (4) filing a Motion for Order Authorizing the Debtor to
         (A) Continue Postpetition Insurance Policy, (B) Pay all
         Prepetition Obligations in Respect Thereof, and
         (C) Continue Insurance Premium Financing Program, and
         obtaining an Order authorizing same;

     (5) Resolving the Motion for Relief from Stay Re:
         3914 Carlisle Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21216 by consent;
         and

     (6) Engaging in several negotiations with Hard Money
         Bankers, LLC -- the largest creditor in the case.

The Debtor claims that it is still in the process of gathering
information necessary to make decisions about how the plan will be
drafted, or what the exit strategy is.

The Debtor tells the Court that it may be on the cusp of resolving
all issues with the largest creditor in this case since the Debtor
has already worked out a deal with Hard Money Bankers, LLC
regarding its real property located in Baltimore City.

However, the Debtor contends that currently, it is still trying to
negotiate with Hard Money Bankers, to work out a deal regarding the
real property located in Howard County. The Debtor believes that if
that deal is worked out, the Debtor may be able to exit
bankruptcy.

Moreover, the Debtor tells the Court that it has also been working
with its accountant to file tax returns and complete operating
reports.

Accordingly, the Debtor needs additional time to complete those
items and to propose a viable plan or finalize an exit strategy.

                   About Metro Housing Project LLC

Metro Housing Project, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 17-17618) on June 2, 2017. The petition was
signed by Seon Ok Lee, member. At the time of filing, the Debtor
had $500,000 to $1 million in estimated assets and $100,000 to
$500,000 in estimated liabilities.

The Debtor is represented by Alon Nager, Esq., at Nager Law Group.


MIDWEST FARM: Allowed to Use PCB Cash Collateral Until Jan. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Charles L. Nail, Jr. of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of South Dakota has issued an Order granting Midwest Farm,
L.L.C., final authority to use $12,112 in Plains Commerce Bank's
cash collateral, for the purposes and on the terms and conditions
set forth on Budget attached to the Debtor's motion.

The Debtor may also use Plains Commerce Bank's cash collateral as
follows: (a) $997,671 by Oct. 1, 2017; (b) $236,785 by Nov. 1,
2017; (c) $234,000 by Dec. 1, 2017; and (d) $47,071 by Jan. 1,
2018.

Plains Commerce Bank is granted as adequate protection:

     (a) a replacement lien, to the extent cash collateral is
actually used, in the same form and priority as Plains Commerce
Bank held pre-petition, subject to the valid existing prior liens
of record, but excluding any lien on Debtor's 2017 crops, crop
products and proceeds, insurance on Debtor's 2017 crops, and
government program proceeds or payments regarding the Debtor's 2017
crops. Such replacement lien will be subject to the valid existing
prior liens of record and will be subject to any adequate
protection the Debtor may provide Bill Landsman and PHI Financial
Services, Ins., under any orders authorizing the Debtor to obtain
secured credit form Bill Landsman and PHI Financial Services.

     (b) a right to inspect its collateral upon reasonable notice
to the Debtor and the Debtor's counsel; and

     (c) the Debtor's obligation to keep Plains Commerce Bank's
collateral insured and to maintain Plains Commerce Bank's
collateral in its present condition.

A full-text copy of the Final Order, dated Sept. 26, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/5PuvYV

                      About Midwest Farm

Midwest Farm, L.L.C., is engaged in the business of grain farming
and custom farming with facilities located in and around Aurora,
South Dakota, and farms real estate located in Brookings County,
South Dakota; Moody County, South Dakota; and Lincoln County,
Minnesota.  Each of Douglas Stein and Dana Stein owns a 50%
membership interest in the Debtor.

Midwest Farm filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. S.D. Case No.
17-40091) on March 24, 2017.  At the time of filing, the Debtor
disclosed $9.69 million in total assets and $6.66 million in total
liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Charles L. Nail, Jr.

Gerry & Kulm Ask, Prof. LLC, is serving as bankruptcy counsel, with
the engagement led by Laura L. Kulm Ask, Esq.  Kathy Meland is the
Debtor's agricultural financial consultant.


MIDWEST FARM: Wants to Continue Plan Exclusivity Until December 31
------------------------------------------------------------------
Midwest Farm, L.L.C., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of South Dakota for an extension of the exclusive time
period within which the Debtor may file its Disclosure Statement
and Plan of Reorganization through December 31, 2017.

On July 24, 2017, the Debtor filed its Disclosure Statement and
Plan of Reorganization.  The Disclosure Statement was approved by
the Court on September 7, and the Court entered an Order setting
the confirmation hearing on the Plan for October 19.

The Debtor's exclusivity period to file a potential modified plan
and/or amended disclosure statement was slated to expire September
29, absent an extension.  The Debtor says it seeks an extension in
order to preserve its exclusivity rights in case it needs to file a
different plan and/or disclosure statement later on.

The Debtor relates it has promptly served its approved Disclosure
Statement and Plan of Reorganization.

The Debtor contends that it has been diligently negotiating on the
plan treatment with its main secured creditor Plains Commerce Bank
to resolve the previously disclosed issue and Debtor has been
negotiating with other creditors in relation to its Plan. Although
the Debtor has reached an agreement with most of the other secured
creditors -- those agreements may be material enough that the
Debtor could have to file and serve a modified plan -- the Debtor
believes that it may be resolving the issues with Plains Commerce
Bank.

In addition, the Debtor claims that its case is a complex Chapter
11 Bankruptcy considering that the Debtor runs a large grain
farming and custom farming operation and this is part of its busy
season. So between the Debtor juggling the time necessary to
effectively operate the business, and also completing the duties
that are required of the Debtor in the Chapter 11 process itself,
the Debtor may need additional time to complete its duties under
the chapter 11.

                      About Midwest Farm

Midwest Farm, L.L.C., is engaged in the business of grain farming
and custom farming with facilities located in and around Aurora,
South Dakota, and farms real estate located in Brookings County,
South Dakota; Moody County, South Dakota; and Lincoln County,
Minnesota.  Each of Douglas Stein and Dana Stein owns a 50%
membership interest in the Debtor.

Midwest Farm filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. S.D. Case No.
17-40091) on March 24, 2017.  At the time of filing, the Debtor
disclosed $9.69 million in total assets and $6.66 million in total
liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Charles L. Nail, Jr.

Gerry & Kulm Ask, Prof. LLC, is serving as bankruptcy counsel, with
the engagement led by Laura L. Kulm Ask, Esq.  Kathy Meland is the
Debtor's agricultural financial consultant.


MIKE FARRELL'S: Creditors Oppose to Cash Collateral Use
-------------------------------------------------------
Creditors Richard Farrell and Detroit Wrecker Sales, Inc.,
submitted to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Michigan their opposition to Mike Farrell's Detroit Wrecker Sales,
LLC's request to use of cash collateral, asserting that it is not
possible to know whether the requested relief is necessary,
considering that there is no Declaration appended.

The Creditors maintain that the Debtor and its principals converted
majority of the machinery and equipment which the Debtor employs in
this pursuit from the Creditors. In 2015, the Creditors initiated
litigation in Wayne County Circuit Court to obtain redress as to
this conversion (Wayne County Lawsuit). However, the Wayne County
Lawsuit is currently stayed due to the Debtor's bankruptcy filing,
but trial has commenced therein.

The Creditors assert that they are the rightful owners of the
majority of the machinery and equipment in the Debtor's possession,
and deny that the machinery and equipment are valued at less than
$20,000. Although the Creditors do not contest that Debtor requires
the machinery and equipment to continue operations, they assert,
however, that these items rightfully belong to them, not the
Debtor.

The Creditors argue that the Debtor's proposal is inadequate since
it ignores that the Creditors own part of the so-called Cash
Collateral -- the Debtor's made no provision to secure the
Creditors' interest in the Collateral. As the actual, rightful
owners of the alleged collateral, who did not join in the creation
of the alleged security interests of GCG and its affiliate, the
Creditors consider that their interest in the cash collateral is
superior not only to the Debtor but to both alleged secured
parties.

Attorneys for the Debtor:

           Jeffrey J. Sattler, Esq.
           Kim K. Hillary, Esq.
           SCHAFER & WEINER PLLC
           40950 Woodward Ave, Ste. 100
           Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
           Tel: (248) 540-3340
           Email: jsattler@schaferandweiner.com
                 khillary@schaferandweiner.com

Attorney for Richard Farrell and Detroit Wrecker Sales, Inc.:

           Mark Bucchi, Esq.
           2855 Coolidge Hy. Suite 203
           Troy, MI 48084
           Tel: (248) 282-1150
           Fax: (248) 250-5888
           Email: mbucchi@novakbucchi.com

Attorney for Greg Errigo:

           Kurt Thornbladh, Esq.
           THORNBLADH LEGAL GROUP
           7301 Schaeffer
           Dearborn, MI 48126
           Tel: (313) 943-2678

Mike Farrell's Detroit Wrecker Sales, LLC, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 17-53308) on Sept. 22, 2017.


MORGAN STANLEY: Fitch Affirms BB+ Preferred Stock Rating
--------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Morgan Stanley's (MS) Long-Term and
Short-Term Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) at 'A/F1', and its
Viability Rating (VR) at 'a'. The Rating Outlook is Stable.

The rating affirmations have been taken in conjunction with Fitch's
periodic review of the Global Trading and Universal Banks (GTUBs).

KEY RATING DRIVERS
IDRs, VR, SENIOR DEBT, AND DERIVATIVE COUNTERPARTY

Fitch's affirmation of MS's ratings and Stable Outlook reflect its
strong global franchise, continued execution of its wealth
management (WM) strategy, capital ratios near the top of the peer
group, and solid funding and liquidity. These rating strengths
continue to be offset by the company's exposure to capital markets
businesses that are more volatile in nature, and its reliance on
wholesale funding.

Fitch views MS's balanced business model across capital markets,
wealth management and investment management favorably. MS derives
approximately 50% of its net revenue from wealth management and
investment management activities, and the other half from
investment banking, equity sales and trading, and fixed income,
currency, and commodities (FICC). Fitch believes MS's business
diversity contributes to more stable and sustainable earnings and
should eventually help overall returns on equity (ROE) to
sustainably meet 2017 targets of between 9%-11%.

Fitch notes that as MS continues to migrate the wealth management
business away from more transactional sources of revenue and
towards more recurring fee-based revenue, this should help the
durability of the segment's overall revenue profile.

Net interest income (NII) continues to become a larger proportion
of MS's wealth management's revenue composition due in part to
growth in lending as well as higher short-term interest rates over
the course of the year. In second quarter 2017 (2Q17), NII
comprised 24.3% of the wealth management segment's overall net
revenue, up from 21.8% in the prior year period.

MS is also increasing its use of technology in order to drive
efficiencies and enhance customer-wallet share. To this end, MS has
continued to execute on its "Project Streamline" efficiency
initiative, which is targeting to reduce overall company expenses
by $1 billion by the end of 2017. This initiative is focused on
optimizing support services through the use of technology, actively
managing compensation expenses and the absence of additional large
litigation charges. The company has indicated that it remains on
track to realize the targeted savings by year-end 2017.

Fitch believes that the higher NII combined with expense control
efforts helped buoy the wealth management segment's pre-tax margin
to 25% in 2Q17 at the high end of the company's targeted range of
between 23%-25%. Given the recent interest-rate hike in June 2017,
Fitch would expect further NII growth and continued growth in the
overall pre-tax profit margin for the WM business over the balance
of the year.

While the wealth management business has been growing, MS's capital
markets activities still make up a significant portion of the
company's revenue and earnings. Recent performance within MS's
Institutional Securities Group (ISG) has improved but remains
variable. Over the course of the year, MS has driven strong
performance in the Investment Banking businesses partially offset
by more tepid performance in the sales & trading businesses.
However, Fitch notes that MS's Fixed Income net revenue decline in
the quarter was lower than those experienced at other large banks.

MS's fully phased-in Basel III Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio
improved to 16.0% as of 2Q17, at the top of the peer-group. In
addition, MS's Fitch Core Capital (FCC) ratio was a strong 16.8% at
2Q17.

Fitch views capital levels as temporarily elevated and expects MS
will look to return more capital to owners to the extent it is
allowed through the CCAR review process each year.

While the company's more wholesale-funded business model is a
rating constraint relative to some peer institutions, Fitch
acknowledges that MS has grown deposits, thereby substantially
reducing its reliance on short-term unsecured funding, and also
increasing its weighted average maturity of wholesale obligations.

DERIVATIVE COUNTERPARTY RATING

MS's Derivative Counterparty Rating (DCR) of 'A' is equalized with
MS's IDR reflecting Fitch's view that derivative counterparties to
MS will rank equally to other senior unsecured creditors.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

Subordinated debt and other hybrid capital issued by MS are all
notched down from the VR in accordance with Fitch's assessment of
each instrument's respective non-performance and relative loss
severity risk profiles, which vary considerably.

Subordinated debt issued by the operating companies is rated at the
same level as subordinated debt issued by MS reflecting the
potential for subordinated creditors in the operating companies to
be exposed to loss ahead of senior creditors in MS. MS's
subordinated debt is rated one notch below MS's VR, its preferred
stock is rated five notches below (which encompasses two notches
for non-performance and three notches for loss severity), and its
trust preferred stock is rated four notches below MS's VR (with two
notches for non-performance and two notches for loss severity).

LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS

U.S. deposit ratings of Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A. (MSBNA) are
one-notch higher than senior debt ratings of MSBNA reflecting the
deposits' superior recovery prospects in case of default given
depositor preference in the U.S.

SUBSIDIARY AND AFFILIATED COMPANY

The Long-Term IDR of MSBNA benefits from an institutional Support
Rating of '1', which indicates Fitch's view that the propensity of
the parent to provide capital support to the operating subsidiaries
is extremely high.

The institutional Support Rating of '1' suggests that MSBNA's
Long-Term IDR would typically be equalized with that of the parent
company; however, MSBNA's ratings also receive an additional
one-notch uplift above MS's Long-Term IDR to reflect Fitch's belief
that the U.S. single point of entry (SPOE) resolution regime, the
likely implementation of total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC)
requirements for U.S. global systemically important banks (G-SIBs),
and the presence of substantial holding company debt reduce the
default risk of these domestic operating subsidiaries' senior
liabilities relative to holding company senior debt.

Additionally, MSBNA's 'F1' Short-Term IDR is at the lower of two
potential Short-Term IDRs which map to an 'A' Long-Term IDR on
Fitch's rating scale, in order to reflect the company's greater
reliance on wholesale funding than more retail-focused banks. MS
and its non-bank operating companies' Short-Term IDRs of 'F1'
reflect Fitch's view that there is less surplus liquidity at these
entities than at the bank, particularly given their greater
reliance on the holding company for liquidity.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

The Support Rating and Support Rating Floor for MS reflect Fitch's
view that senior creditors cannot rely on receiving extraordinary
support from the sovereign in the event that MS becomes non-viable.
In Fitch's view, implementation of the Dodd Frank Orderly
Liquidation Authority legislation has now sufficiently progressed
to provide a framework for resolving banks that is likely to
require holding company senior creditors to participate in losses,
if necessary, instead of or ahead of the company receiving
sovereign support. As previously noted, MSBNA has a Support Rating
of '1', which reflects Fitch's view of an extremely high
probability of institutional support for the entity. MSBNA does not
have a VR at this time, given Fitch's view of its more limited role
within the group structure.

RATING SENSITIVITIES
VR, IDRs, SENIOR DEBT, AND DERIVATIVE COUNTERPARTY RATING

Fitch considers MS's VR to be well situated at its current level.
There could be some longer-term upside to ratings, although this
would likely be limited to the 'A' rating category, reflecting the
cyclicality of many of MS's capital markets businesses and its
primary reliance on wholesale, confidence-sensitive funding
sources.

Should MS further improve the level and stability of its earnings
such that overall annual ROEs are sustainably in excess of the
company's targets of 9%-11%, while further reducing its reliance on
wholesale funding and maintaining strong capital ratios, this could
lead to some modest upside to the ratings.

Potential downside risks to ratings include any large and/or
unforeseen losses from either litigation or a risk management
failure, particularly if permanent franchise damage is incurred as
a result.

Fitch notes that MS's Long-Term IDR, senior debt, and DCR are
equalized with the VR at the holding company. Thus MS's IDR, senior
debt ratings and DCR would be sensitive to any changes in MS's VR.

DERIVATIVE COUNTERPARTY RATING

DCRs are primarily sensitive to changes in the respective issuers'
Long-Term IDRs. In addition, they could be upgraded to one-notch
above the IDR if a change in legislation (for example as recently
proposed in the EU) creates legal preference for derivatives over
certain other senior obligations and, in Fitch's view, the volume
of all legally subordinated obligations provides a substantial
enough buffer to protect derivative counterparties from default in
a resolution scenario.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

Subordinated debt and other hybrid ratings are primarily sensitive
to any change in MS's VR and secondarily to a change in Fitch's
recovery expectations for such instruments.

LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS

MSBNA's deposit ratings are sensitive to any change in the entity's
IDR, which is sensitive to any change in the VR of the parent
company given the institutional SR of '1'. Thus, deposit ratings
are ultimately sensitive to any change in MS's VR or Fitch's view
of institutional support for that entity.

SUBSIDIARY AND AFFILIATED COMPANY

MSBNA's IDR is rated one-notch higher than the parent holding
company's IDR because the bank subsidiary benefits from the
structural subordination of holding company TLAC, which effectively
supports senior operating liabilities of the bank subsidiary. Any
change in Fitch's view on the structural subordination of TLAC with
respect to MSBNA could also result in a change in MSBNA's IDR.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

Support Ratings and Support Rating Floors would be sensitive to any
change in Fitch's view of support. However, since these two were
downgraded to '5' and 'No Floor', respectively, in May 2015, there
is unlikely to be any change to these ratings in the foreseeable
future.

MSBNA's Institutional SR of '1' is sensitive to any change in
Fitch's views of potential institutional support for this entity
from the parent company.

Fitch affirms the following:

Morgan Stanley
-- Long-Term IDR at 'A'; Outlook Stable;
-- Long-term senior debt at 'A';
-- Derivative Counterparty Rating at 'A(dcr)';
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F1';
-- Short-term debt at 'F1';
-- Commercial paper at 'F1';
-- Market linked securities at 'Aemr';
-- VR at 'a';
-- Subordinated debt at 'A-';
-- Preferred stock at 'BB+';
-- Support at '5';
-- Support floor at 'NF'.

Morgan Stanley Bank N.A.
-- Long-Term IDR at 'A+'; Outlook Stable;
-- Long-term Deposits at 'AA-';
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F1';
-- Short-term Deposits at 'F1+';
-- Support at '1'.

Morgan Stanley Canada Ltd
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F1';
-- Short-term debt at 'F1';
-- Commercial paper at 'F1'.

Morgan Stanley International Finance SA
-- Short-Term debt at 'F1'.

Morgan Stanley Secured Financing LLC
-- Long-term senior debt at 'A';
-- Short-term debt at 'F1'.


MOTORS LIQUIDATION: Appraisal of 200,000 Assets Not Feasible
------------------------------------------------------------
Defendants in the adversary proceeding captioned MOTORS LIQUIDATION
COMPANY AVOIDANCE ACTION TRUST, by and through the Wilmington Trust
Company, solely in its capacity as Trust Administrator and Trustee,
Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants,
Adversary Proceeding Case No. 09-00504 (MG) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.), are
a group of Old GM's creditors referred to as the Term Lenders, who
initially held a security interest in approximately $1.5 billion of
Old GM's assets, with a perfected security interest resulting from
a UCC-1 Statement filed in Delaware.

In earlier stages of this litigation, the perfected security
interest of the Term Lenders resulting from the Delaware UCC-1
filing was terminated when a UCC-3 Termination Statement was
mistakenly filed in Delaware. Despite the filing of the UCC-3
Termination Statement in Delaware, the Defendants allege that at
the time of the 363 Sale they held a perfected security interest in
over 200,000 fixtures at GM plants because of 26 Fixture Filings in
counties where disputed assets were located.

The Defendants argue that these fixtures should be valued according
to their replacement cost new less depreciation, as part of a
going-concern business.  The Avoidance Action Trust, on behalf of
Old GM's unsecured creditors, disputes whether most of these assets
are indeed fixtures, and if they were, it argues that they should
be valued at their liquidation value.

Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn opines that it is impractical, to say
the least, to litigate issues with respect to each of the over
200,000 disputed assets. Therefore, in pretrial proceedings, the
Court directed the parties to designate 40 representative assets to
be the subject of the trial.

Exercising its discretion to craft the best available valuation
from the evidence presented at trial, the Court largely rejects the
two options presented by the parties and instead finds that the
KPMG values, including the earnings-based downward adjustment, are
the best valuation methodology for the Old GM assets sold to New GM
that were expected to remain in continued use. It would not be
appropriate to include the value of the Public Policy Subsidy in
the individual valuation of the Representative Assets. But teasing
out the value of the Public Policy Subsidy does not require
resorting to a counterfactual hypothetical world in which the 363
Sale never occurred.

The Court finds that, for the Representative Assets that were sold
to New GM, a "going concern in continued use" premise of value is
appropriate. Those assets were intended to be sold as part of a
going concern business; they were indeed sold, and most of them are
still in operation to this day. Valuing those assets under a
liquidation premise would disregard their proposed disposition on
the Valuation Date, run counter to the facts of this case, and
significantly deprive the Defendants of the going concern value of
their collateral.

In keeping with the principle that assets should be valued
according to their proposed disposition on the Valuation Date and
not a hypothetical outcome, the two Representative Assets that were
not sold to New GM should not be valued on a going-concern premise.
Those assets were intended on the Valuation Date to remain with the
Motors Liquidation Co. estate and be liquidated within one to two
years, and so they were. Consistent with their proposed disposition
on the Valuation Date, the Court adopts liquidation value for those
assets.

Valuing the hundreds of thousands of assets the Defendants contend
are collateral for the Term Loan is no less daunting than assessing
whether those assets are fixtures. The Court recognizes--as the
parties likely do--that individual appraisal of over 200,000 assets
is simply not feasible. The Court hopes that the parties will be
able to resolve the dispute through settlement.

A full-text copy of Judge Glenn's Memorandum Opinion dated Sept.
26, 2017, is available at https://is.gd/gyBIQQ from Leagle.com.

Motors Liquidation Company, Plaintiff, represented by Neil S.
Binder – nbinder@binderschwartz.com -- Binder & Schwartz LLP,
Lindsay A. Bush -- lbush@binderschwartz.com -- Binder & Schwartz
LLP, Eric Fisher -- efisher@binderschwartz.com -- Binder & Schwartz
LLP, Lauren K. Handelsman -- lhandelsman@binderschwartz.com --
Binder & Schwartz LLP, Tessa Brianne Harvey --
tharvey@binderschwartz.com -- Binder & Schwartz LLP, Michael M.
Hodgson -- mhodgson@binderschwartz.com -- Binder & Schwartz LLP &
Evan J. Zucker, Blank Rome LLP.

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by John M.
Callagy -- jcallagy@kelleydrye.com -- Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP,
Emil A. Kleinhaus -- EAKleinhaus@WLRK.com -- Wachtell, Lipton,
Rosen & Katz, Martin Krolewski – mkrolewski@kelleydrye.com --
Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, Harold S. Novikoff --
HSNovikoff@wlrk.com -- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, Carrie M.
Reilly – cmreilly@wlrk.com -- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, S.
Christopher Szczerban, Wachtell -- SCS@wlrk.com -- Lipton, Rosen &
Katz, Christopher Lee Wilson -- CLWilson@wlrk.com -- Wachtell,
Lipton, Rosen & Katz & Marc Wolinsky -- MWolinsky@wlrk.com --
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz.

Alticor Inc, Defendant, represented by Joseph H. Lemkin --
jlemkin@stark-stark.com -- Stark & Stark, Emily S. Rucker –
erucker@wnj.com -- Warner Norcross & Judd LLP & Gordon J. Toering
– gtoering@wnj.com -- Warner Norcross & Judd LLP.

Arrowgrass Master Fund Ltd, Defendant, represented by Elliot
Moskowitz -- elliot.moskowitz@davispolk.com -- Davis Polk &
Wardwell LLP.

Atrium IV, Defendant, represented by Bruce Bennett --
bbennett@jonesday.com -- Jones Day.

Blackrock Corporate High Yield Fund, Inc., Defendant, represented
by Andrew K. Glenn -- aglenn@kasowitz.com -- Kasowitz Benson Torres
LLP.

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Defendant, represented by Oscar
N. Pinkas  -- oskar.pinkas@dentons.com -- Dentons US LLP.

Carlyle High Yield Par IX Ltd., Defendant, represented by Mark T.
Power -- mpower@hahnhessen.com -- Hahn & Hessen LLP.

DE-SEI Instl Inv TR-Hi Yld BD, Defendant, represented by Denis Dice
-- Dice.D@wssllp.com -- Winget, Spadafora & Schwartzberg, Richard
David Lane -- rdlane@mdwcg.com -- Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman
& Goggin & Joel Wertman -- Wertman.J@wssllp.com -- Winget,
Spadafora & Schwartzberg.

Highland Credit Opportunities CDO, Ltd., Defendant, represented by
Jill B. Bienstock -- jbienstock@coleschotz.com -- Cole Schotz P.C.
& Gary H. Leibowitz -- gleibowitz@coleschotz.com -- Cole Schotz
P.C.

Ohio Police & Fire Pension, Defendant, represented by Daniel R.
Swetnam -- deborah.martin@icemiller.com -- Ice Miller LLP.

Reams - City of Oakland Police, Defendant, represented by Noah M.
Schubert, Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe, LLP.

State of Connecticut, Defendant, represented by Elizabeth Austin --
eaustin@pullcom.com -- Pullman & Comley, LLC.

                  About Motors Liquidation

General Motors Corporation and three of its affiliates filed for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 09-50026) on
June 1, 2009.  The Honorable Robert E. Gerber presides over the
Chapter 11 cases.  Harvey R. Miller, Esq., Stephen Karotkin, Esq.,
and Joseph H. Smolinsky, Esq., at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP,
assist the Debtors in their restructuring efforts.  Al Koch at AP
Services, LLC, an affiliate of AlixPartners, LLP, serves as the
Chief Executive Officer for Motors Liquidation Company.  GM is also
represented by Jenner & Block LLP and Honigman Miller Schwartz and
Cohn LLP as counsel.  Cravath, Swaine, & Moore LLP is providing
legal advice to the GM Board of Directors.  GM's financial advisors
are Morgan Stanley, Evercore Partners and the Blackstone Group LLP.
Garden City Group is the claims and notice agent of the Debtors.

The U.S. Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors and a separate Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Holding Asbestos-Related Claims. Lawyers at Kramer Levin Naftalis &
Frankel LLP served as bankruptcy counsel to the Creditors
Committee.  Attorneys at Butzel Long served as counsel on supplier
contract matters.  FTI Consulting Inc. served as financial advisors
to the Creditors Committee. Elihu Inselbuch, Esq., at Caplin &
Drysdale, Chartered, represented the Asbestos Committee.  Legal
Analysis Systems, Inc., served as asbestos valuation analyst.

The Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Debtors'
Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan on March 29, 2011.  The Plan
was declared effect on March 31.

On Dec. 15, 2011, Motors Liquidation Company was dissolved.  On the
Dissolution Date, pursuant to the Plan and the Motors Liquidation
Company GUC Trust Agreement, dated March 30, 2011, between the
parties thereto, the trust administrator and trustee -- GUC Trust
Administrator -- of the Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust,
assumed responsibility for the affairs of and certain claims
against MLC and its debtor subsidiaries that were not concluded
prior to the Dissolution Date.


NATIONAL VISION: IPO Filing Credit Positive, Moody's Says
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service said National Vision, Inc.'s ("National
Vision", B2 stable) planned Initial Public Offering (IPO) is a
credit positive because if completed, it will result in lower debt
levels. However, given the uncertainty regarding its completion, as
well as its size and the amount of debt repaid, the ratings and
outlook remain unchanged.

National Vision, Inc. ("National Vision"), headquartered in Duluth,
GA, is a U.S. optical retailer with a focus on low price point
eyeglasses and contacts. The company operates 980 locations,
including its own retail chains of America's Best Contacts and
Eyeglasses ("ABC", 559 locations) and Eyeglass World ("EGW", 108
locations), as well as locations at host stores, including Wal-Mart
(227 locations), Fred Meyer (29 locations) and U.S. Military Bases
(57 locations). The company also sells contact lenses online.
Private equity firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. owns a
majority stake in National Vision since the March 2014 buyout.
Revenues for LTM period ended July 2017 were approximately $1.3
billion.


NEFF RENTAL: S&P Raised Then Withdrew CCR Amid United Rentals Deal
------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. equipment rental company United Rentals Inc. has completed its
acquisition of Neff Rental LLC and has repaid the company's senior
secured second-lien term loan

S&P Global Ratings thus raised its corporate credit rating on
Miami-based equipment rental provider Neff Rental LLC to 'BB-' from
'B' and removed the rating from CreditWatch, where S&P placed it
with positive implications on July 17, 2017. The outlook is
positive.

S&P said, "At the same time, we withdrew our 'B-' issue-level
rating and '5' recovery rating on Neff's senior secured debt
because it was repaid in full.

"Subsequently, we withdrew our corporate credit rating on Neff at
United Rentals' request."


OCEAN RIG: Meets Nasdaq Listing Compliance Requirements
-------------------------------------------------------
Ocean Rig UDW Inc. (NASDAQ: ORIG), an international contractor of
offshore deepwater drilling services, on Sept. 27, 2017, disclosed
that it has received formal notice from The Nasdaq Stock Market
("Nasdaq") that it has demonstrated compliance with all applicable
requirements for the continued listing of the Company's common
stock on Nasdaq.  As previously announced on June 12, 2017, the
Nasdaq Hearings Panel had granted the Company a conditional
exception from the decision by the Nasdaq Staff to delist the
Company's common stock and had asked the Company to demonstrate
compliance with certain listing requirements upon emergence from
its financial restructuring.  The Company announced the completion
of its financial restructuring on September 22, 2017.  Nasdaq
confirmed that, as a result of its favorable determination, the
Company's common stock will continue to be listed on The Nasdaq
Global Select Market and that the compliance matter is now closed.

                        About Ocean Rig

Nicosia, Cyprus-based Ocean Rig UDW Inc. (NASDAQ: ORIG) --
http://www.ocean-rig.com/-- is an international offshore drilling
contractor providing oilfield services for offshore oil and gas
exploration, development and production drilling, and specializing
in the ultra-deepwater and harsh-environment segment of the
offshore drilling industry.

On March 24, 2017, Ocean Rig UDW Inc., et al., filed winding up
petitions with the Cayman Court and issued summonses for the
appointment of joint provisional liquidators for the purpose of the
Restructuring.  By orders of the Cayman Court dated March 27, 2017,
Simon Appell and Eleanor Fisher were appointed as the JPLs and duly
authorized foreign representatives, and the Cayman Provisional
Liquidation Proceedings were commenced.

Simon Appell and Eleanor Fisher of AlixPartners, LLP, in their
capacities, as the joint provisional liquidators and authorized
foreign representatives, filed for Chapter 15 protection for Ocean
Rig and its affiliates (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-10736) on
March 27, 2017, to seek recognition of the Cayman proceedings.

The JPLs' U.S. counsel are Evan C. Hollander, Esq., and Raniero
D'Aversa Jr., Esq., at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, in New
York.

                          *     *     *

On Sept. 15, 2017, the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands sanctioned
the schemes of arrangements of the Company and its subsidiaries,
Drill Rigs Holdings Inc. ("DRH"), Drillships Financing Holding Inc.
("DFH"), and Drillships Ocean Ventures Inc., ("DOV," and together
with UDW, DRH and DFH, the "Scheme Companies").  The terms of the
restructuring have therefore been approved by the Cayman Court.


OCONEE REGIONAL: May Assume & Assign Cigna Contracts to Navicent
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Austin E. Carter of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Georgia authorized Oconee Regional Health Systems,
Inc., and its affiliates to assume and assign the Cigna Contracts
to Navicent Health, Inc. or its Designee, in connection of the sale
of substantially all their assets outside the ordinary course of
business.

Cigna Healthcare of Georgia, Inc. and HealthSpring Life & Health
Insurance Co. ("Cigna") filed the Limited Objection of Cigna
Entities to Assumption and Assignment of Contracts and Sale.  The
Cigna Objection is resolved as follows:

     a. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Sale Order,
or in any Order or Notice filed in connection with the Sale, the
following contracts ("Cigna Provider Agreements") will be assumed
and assigned to Navicent as of the Effective Date of Closing:

          i. Facilities Service Agreement between Debtor Oconee
Regional Medical Center, Inc., and Cigna Healthcare of Georgia,
Inc. and HealthSpring Life & Health Insurance Company, effective
11/1/15, including all amendments, addendums, exhibits, schedules,
etc. related thereto.

          ii. Provider Group Services Agreement between Oconee
Regional Medical Center, Inc. and Cigna Healthcare of Georgia,
Inc., effective October 2007, including all amendments, addendums,
exhibits, schedules, etc. related thereto.

          iii. Hospital Services Agreement between Oconee Regional
Medical Center, Inc. and Cigna Healthcare of Georgia, Inc.,
effective (12/15/07), including all amendments, addendums,
exhibits, schedules, etc. related thereto.

          iv. Provider Service Agreement between Debtor Oconee
Internal Medicine, LLC and Cigna Healthcare of Georgia, Inc. and
HealthSpring Life & Health Insurance Company, effective 2/1/16,
including all amendments, addendums, exhibits, schedules, etc.
related thereto.

          v. Physician Services Letter Agreement between Debtor
Oconee Orthopedics, LLC and Cigna Healthcare of Georgia, Inc. and
HealthSpring Life & Health Insurance Company, effective 3/1/15,
including all amendments, addendums, exhibits, schedules, etc.
related thereto.

          vi. Provider Service Agreement between Debtor Oconee
Regional Health Ventures LLC (doing business as Oconee Neurology
Services) and Cigna HealthCare of Georgia, Inc. and HealthSpring
Life & Health Insurance Company, Inc., effective 1/1/16, including
all amendments, exhibits, schedules, etc. related thereto.

     b. In lieu of cure costs, any obligations accruing under the
Cigna Provider Agreements on or after June 23, 2017, will pass
through and survive assumption and assignment to Navicent so that
nothing in the Order or 11 U.S.C. Section 365 will affect Cigna's
rights of recovery and/or recoupment under the Cigna Provider
Agreements for any overpayments accruing on or after June 23, 2017,
or any defenses with respect thereto.  The Debtors' bankruptcy
estates will not be liable for any unpaid obligations which have
accrued, or may accrue, under the Cigna Provider Agreements.

     c. Navicent has represented to the Court that, after the
Effective Date of Closing, the Hospital will perform substantially
the same services that the Debtors historically performed at the
Hospital pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement
between the Debtors, Navicent Health Oconee, LLC and the Baldwin
County Hospital Authority dated June 27, 2017.

     d. Cigna, Navicent and the Debtors will cooperate and execute
and deliver any instruments, consents or other documents that may
be required to effectuate the assignment of the Cigna Provider
Agreements to Navicent in accordance with the Order.

     e. The Court retains exclusive jurisdiction with respect to
all matters arising from or related to the implementation of the
Agreed Order.

              About Oconee Regional Medical Center

Oconee Regional Medical Center (ORMC) is located in Milledgeville
near the geographic center of Georgia, providing advanced
healthcare technologies to the 90,000 residents living in the seven
surrounding counties.

Oconee Regional Health Systems, Inc., owner of the Oconee Regional
Medical Center, and six of its affiliates filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Lead Case No. 17-51005) on
May 10, 2017.  

On May 11, 2017, two more affiliates ORHV Sandersville Family
Practice, LLC and Oconee Regional Senior Living, Inc., sought
bankruptcy protection.  Their cases are jointly administered with
that of ORMC.

The petitions were signed by Steven M. Johnson, interim chief
executive officer.

At the time of the filing, ORHS estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.

The Debtors are represented by Mark I. Duedall, Esq., and Leah
Fiorenza McNeill, Esq., in Atlanta, Georgia.  The Debtors hired
James-Bates-Brannan-Groover-LLP as special counsel, and Grant
Thornton as financial advisor.

On May 16, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Greenberg Traurig, LLP,
is the committee's bankruptcy counsel.  The committee hired the Law
Offices of Henry F. Sewell, Jr., LLC as its special counsel.


OL FRESH LLC: PUB Agrees to Cash Collateral Use Through Nov. 30
---------------------------------------------------------------
OL Fresh, LLC submits to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Massachusetts a revised and consented motion for continued
interim authorization for the use of People's United Bank's cash
collateral for the continuation of its business operations through
Nov. 30, 2017.

The Debtor's budget projected to actual cash flow statements for
the period July 11 through Sept. 19, 2017 provides total
disbursements of $12,427.  It also indicates total conversion
expenses paid $4,588, plus remaining conversion costs $9,525.  The
Budget for Sept. 1 through Nov. 30 reflects total cash
disbursements in the aggregate sum of $28,925 for the month of
September 2017.

People's United Bank is owed, as of the date of filing, a total of
$251,000, a result of two loans made by the Debtor.  The
indebtedness is guaranteed by the Debtor's owner James Amatucci in
initial amount of $277,000 and $33,000.  The loans are subject to a
Commercial Security Agreement between the Debtor and People's
United Bank, which provides for an "all asset security agreement."


The Debtor and People's United Bank have agreed to the treatment of
the People's United Bank Loan in the Debtor's Plan of
Reorganization.  The Debtor agreed to file a Disclosure Statement
and Plan of Reorganization on or before Nov. 15, 2017, to allow the
Debtor to determine the effect of the conversion of its business
from an OL Fresh Frozen Yogurt Shop to its Ethos fast food and
frozen desert concept.

People's United Bank has also consented to the conversion of the
Debtor's business. The Debtor has determined to change the business
from a frozen yogurt shop to a restaurant serving a wide variety of
fast food items, including frozen yogurt, to avoid the seasonal
swings of business income due the existing business serving
principally frozen desert items during the winter months.

The Debtor proposes to file its Disclosure statement and Plan on
November 15, 2017, in order to allow the result of operation for
the new format to be included since the transition to its new
concept necessitated a brief shutdown of operation, from Sept. 1 to
Oct. 5, 2017, and restarting under the new format.

Currently, the franchise agreement between Orange Fresh and the
Debtor has been terminated (with a termination fee of $200), which
will save the Debtor an average $15,000 per year.

On July 12, 2017, the Court allowed the Debtor's Motion for use of
cash collateral on an interim basis through September 19, 2017.
Presently, the Debtor is current with its agreed adequate
protection payment to People's United Bank.

People's United Bank consents to the Debtor's use of cash
collateral.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Revised and Consented Motion dated
Sept. 26, 2017, is available at https://is.gd/JzziOx

                          About OL Fresh

OL Fresh, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Mass. Case
No. 17-10994) on March 23, 2017.  The petition was signed by James
W. Amatucci, managing member. At the time of filing, the Debtor
disclosed $30,400 in total assets and $298,003 in total
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Joan N. Feeney.  The
Debtor is represented by Timothy M. Mauser, Esq.  


PBF LOGISTICS: Moody's Hikes $350MM Sr. Unsec. Notes Rating to B2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded PBF Logistics LP's (PBFX) $350
million senior unsecured notes to B2 from B3 and rated its proposed
tack-on $150 million unsecured notes B2. Moody's also affirmed the
B1 Corporate Family Rating and B1-PD Probability of Default Rating,
and upgraded Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating to SGL-2 from
SGL-3. The rating outlook remains stable.

Affirmations:

-- Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B1

-- Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B1-PD

Upgrades:

-- Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Upgraded to SGL-2 from
    SGL-3

-- $350 Million Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture due 2023,

    Upgraded to B2 (LGD5) from B3 (LGD5)

Assignment:

-- $150 Million Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture due 2023,

    Assigned B2 (LGD5)

Outlook Action:

-- Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B2 rating on the senior unsecured notes reflects their
subordination to PBFX's $360 million first lien senior secured
revolving credit facility which is expected to be utilized less
than in the past through end of 2018. PBFX's revolver is secured by
substantially all of its assets. Because of the smaller
proportionate size of the priority claims in the capital structure,
pro forma for the tack-on notes issuance, relative to the senior
unsecured notes, Moody's rate the notes one notch below the B1 CFR,
consistent with Moody's Loss Given Default methodology.

PBFX's B1 CFR reflects its strategic and operational importance to
PBF Energy Company LLC (PBF), as the master limited partnership
(MLP) will provide PBF critical infrastructure and a coordinated
growth strategy. PBF Holding Company LLC, PBF's wholly owned
subsidiary, owns PBF's operating subsidiaries and has a Ba3 CFR. On
a standalone basis however, PBFX's credit profile would be more
consistent with a B2 CFR, with stable cash flows from long-term,
fee-based contracts with minimum volume commitments, and its
potential growth trajectory, but restrained by its small scale of
operations with limited third-party revenues, short track record as
an MLP, and high distributions associated with its MLP structure.
PBF also owns 44% of PBFX's limited partner (LP) interest, 100% of
the PBF general partner (GP) interest and 100% of PBFX's incentive
distribution rights (IDRs). Having a common management team as well
as PBF Energy Company LLC's significant ownership stake and
controlling interest in both, PBF and PBFX, support the ratings.

PBFX's SGL-2 liquidity rating reflects Moody's expectations of good
liquidity through at least 2018. The liquidity profile is hampered
by its high distribution payouts. Pro forma for the tack-on
issuance PBFX had $51 million of cash and $314 million of
availability under its $360 million revolving credit facility, as
of June 30, 2017. The revolving credit facility matures in May 2019
and is secured by substantially all of PBFX's assets and includes
covenants of maximum total leverage of 4.5x, maximum secured
leverage of 3.5x and minimum interest coverage of 2.5x. Moody's
projects the company will be in compliance with these covenants for
the next 12 months. Funding of future drop-downs will require
equity and debt capital market access to ensure covenant
compliance. Moody's believes that the company will need to continue
financing its acquisitions with a commensurate portion of equity.

PBFX's ratings could be upgraded if the company is able to increase
its size and scale while maintaining reasonable leverage (EBITDA
exceeding $200 million, debt/EBITDA below 4x and net property,
plant & equipment exceeding $500 million on a sustained basis).
Liquidity should remain at least adequate for a ratings upgrade.
PBFX's ratings could be downgraded if debt / EBITDA were to be
sustained above 5.0x due to a leveraging acquisition, or if the
company acquired a significant amount of new assets with a weak
business risk profile. If PBF's credit quality were to materially
decline to B1 or below, this could also pressure PBFX's ratings.

PBF Logistics LP (PBFX) is a master limited partnership
headquartered in Parsippany, NJ with assets including crude oil
unloading rail terminals, pipelines, truck terminals, product
storage tanks and loading facilities, and a LPG storage and loading
facility.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Midstream
Energy published in May 2017.


PBF LOGISTICS: S&P Affirms B+ Rating on 6.875% Sr. Unsecured Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B+' issue-level rating on PBF
Logistics L.P.'s 6.875% senior unsecured notes. The recovery rating
on the notes remains '3', indicating our expectation of meaningful
(50%-70%; rounded estimate: 65%) recovery in the event of a payment
default.

The company has launched a $150 million add-on to the notes. This
brings the total issue amount to $500 million. The company will use
net proceeds from the add-on to repay existing borrowings on the
credit facility.

S&P said, "Our 'BB' issue-level rating and '1' recovery rating on
the company's senior secured credit facility are unchanged. The '1'
recovery rating reflects our expectation of very high (90%-100%;
rounded estimate: 95%) recovery in the event of default. Our 'B+'
corporate credit rating and stable outlook on PBF Logistics are
also unchanged."

The ratings on PBF Logistics L.P. represent the company's limited
operating history; small scale; and narrow but growing geographic
footprint, and reliance on its partner sponsor, PBF Energy Inc.,
for most of its revenue. PBF Logistics' short track record as a
master limited partnership, as well as its small size, scale, and
geographic footprint, limits the current rating.

Ratings List

  PBF Logistics L.P.
   Corporate Credit Rating                    B+/Stable

  Rating Affirmed

  PBF Logistics L.P.
   6.875% senior unsecured notes              B+
    Recovery Rating                           3(65%)


PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH: S&P Rates 2021 $550MM Term Loan A 'BB'
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating to Raleigh, N.C.-based PRA Health Sciences Inc.'s
$550 million term loan A due 2021, which is issued by operating
subsidiary Pharmaceutical Research Associate Inc. The '3' recovery
rating indices our expectation for meaningful (50% to 70%; rounded
estimate 55%) recovery in the event of a payment default. PRA
Health is using the term loan to fund the acquisition of Symphony
Health Solutions and associated fees.

S&P said, "We revised our senior secured rounded recovery estimate
to 55% from 60%, denoting slightly lower recovery prospects for the
senior secured facility given the greater amount of secured debt
following the transaction. The senior secured facility's recovery
rating of '3' is unchanged.

"Our 'BB' corporate credit rating and stable outlook are unchanged.
In addition, our 'BB-' issue-level rating on the 9.5% senior
unsecured notes is unchanged."

RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors

PRA's capital structure consists of a $140 million asset-backed
bank loan (assumed fully drawn), $125 million revolver (assumed 85%
drawn), a $625 million first-lien term loan A, a $550 million
first-lien term loan A, and $91.4 million in 9.5% senior unsecured
notes.

The '3' recovery rating on the senior secured credit facility
indicates the expectation of meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate
55%) recovery.

The '5' recovery rating on the senior unsecured credit facility
indicates the expectation of meaningful (10%-30%, rounded estimate
15%) recovery.

S&P said, "Our simulated default scenario contemplates a default in
2022, stemming from increased contract cancellations and lower
renewals. Given the stickiness of in-process clinical trials and
anticipated continued demand for outsourcing in the pharmaceutical
industry, we believe PRA would remain a viable business and would
therefore reorganize rather than liquidate following a payment
default. Consequently, we have used an enterprise value methodology
to gauge recovery prospects.

"We apply a positive 20% operational adjustment because we believe
that lenders will not allow leverage to exceed 9x, slightly higher
leverage than our previous assessment given the slight
diversification provided by Symphony.

"We do not include any debt amortization payments in the default
year because we believe amortization would be renegotiated prior to
default.

"We have valued the company on a going-concern basis using a 5.5x
multiple of our projected emergence EBITDA, the same multiple used
for other large, global clinical CROs.”

Simulated default assumptions

-- Simulated year of default: 2021
-- EBITDA at emergence: $143 mil.
-- EBITDA multiple: 5.5x

Simplified waterfall

-- Net enterprise value (after 5% admin. costs): $745 mil.
-- Valuation split in % (obligors/nonobligors): 60/40
-- Collateral from obligors: $447 mil.
-- Priority claims (accounts receivable financing agreement): $143
mil.
-- Obligor collateral value available to first-lien creditors:
$304 mil.
-- Non-obligor collateral value available to first-lien creditors:
$194 mil.
-- Portion of unsecured value available to first lien: $88 mil.
-- Total value available to first lien: $585 mil.
-- Secured first-lien debt at emergence: $1,034 mil.
    --Recovery expectations: 50%-70%; rounded estimate: 55%
-- Collateral value available to unsecured debt: $16 mil.
-- Total unsecured debt: $96 mil.
    --Recovery expectations: 10%-30%; rounded estimate: 15%

Notes: All debt amounts include six months of pre-petition
interest.

RATINGS LIST

New Rating

Pharmaceutical Research Associates Inc.
$550 mil Term Loan A due 2021              BB
  Recovery Rating                           3 (55%)


PHILADELPHIA HEALTH SYSTEM: Liquidation Plan Filed
--------------------------------------------------
North Philadelphia Health System filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court its Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation and explanatory Disclosure
Statement on September 27, 2017.

The Debtor also filed a Motion to Approve Disclosure Statement (II)
Procedures For The Solicitation And Tabulation of Votes to Accept
or Reject The Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan; and (III) Related Notice
and Objection Procedures.

On September 28, the Hon. Magdeline D. Coleman the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania signed an order
extending the exclusive filing period of North Philadelphia Health
System to propose a plan through October 2, as well as the
exclusive period to solicit acceptances of a plan through December
1, 2017.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor asked the Court to extend its exclusive periods for
approximately 35 days, saying that it is the Debtor's second
request for an extension of its Exclusive Periods, and it does not
intend to seek an additional extension of the Exclusive Filing
Period beyond this request.

The Debtor has been a debtor-in-possession for approximately eight
months.  The Debtor said that during this time, it has made
significant progress in administering its Chapter 11 case,
including the completion of a sale of a significant asset, the
major repayment of a substantial amount of secured debt, and the
marketing and auction sale of substantially all of its assets.

The Debtor's case has been designated as a complex Chapter 11 case
due to the level of its debts and the number of creditors.  The
secured debt reported on the Debtor's schedules is approximately
$17 million.  The Debtor's unsecured debt (priority and
non-priority) is approximately $29 million.

Included in the creditor groups are the divergent interests of the
HUD Group; Gemino Healthcare Finance, LLC; the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors; the City of Philadelphia; Pennsylvania
Department of Human Services; and Community Behavioral Health.

The Debtor also said that negotiations with various creditor groups
have resulted in the sale of certain of the Debtor's assets and
repayment of a substantial portion of its secured debt.  In
addition, the negotiations have led to the sale process regarding
the sale of substantially all of the Debtor's assets.

The Debtor told the Court that it has worked to move this case
forward expeditiously and, in that vein, on April 6, 2017,
completed the sale of property located at 1600-1650 W. Girard
Avenue for the benefit of its estate.  By virtue of that
transaction and transfers identified in the Court's March 22, 2017
court order, $8,876,523 was sent to BNYM for the retirement of
outstanding bonds.  On Aug. 11, following an extensive marketing
process, the Debtor held an auction for substantially all of its
assets.  Following the sale hearing on Aug. 15, Judge Coleman
approved the asset sale to 1301 North 8th Ltd. Partnership, 1315
North 8th Ltd. Partnership, and Project HOME.

The Debtor then commenced discussions with the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors regarding a proposed plan.

              About North Philadelphia Health System

North Philadelphia Health System, a Pennsylvania non-profit,
non-stock, non-member corporation, operates the Girard Medical
Center, a state-licensed 65-person private psychiatric hospital,
and the Goldman Clinic, a medically assisted treatment center
located Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

North Philadelphia Health System sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 16-18931) on Dec.
30, 2016.  The petition was signed by George Walmsley III,
president & CEO.  The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at
$10 million to $50 million.

The case is assigned to Judge Magdeline D. Coleman.

The Debtor hired Martin J. Weis, Esq. at Dilworth Paxson LLP as
counsel; John D. Kutzler, Esq. at Buzby & Kutzler, Attorneys at
Law, as special counsel; and SSG Advisors as investment banker.

On Jan. 23, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee retained
Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP as its legal counsel and M S
Fox Real Estate Group as consultant.


PHOTOMEDEX INC: Resumes Trading on Nasdaq
-----------------------------------------
PhotoMedex, Inc. said that on Sept. 28, 2017, the Company received
formal notice that the Nasdaq Listing and Hearing Review Council
had granted the Company's request for the resumption of trading of
the Company's common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market, which
took effect on Oct. 2, 2017.

The Listing Council's determination to continue the Company's
listing and resume trading of the Company's common stock on Nasdaq
followed the Listing Council's conclusion that the Nasdaq Hearings
Panel erred when it determined to delist the Company's securities
from Nasdaq.  As a result of the Panel's decision, trading in the
Company's common stock was suspended on Nasdaq effective with the
opening of business on July 7, 2017.  The Company's common stock
has traded in the over-the-counter market since that time.

"We appreciate the Nasdaq Listing Council's careful review of the
Company's appeal, and are grateful that the Company's stock has
been allowed to resume trading on Nasdaq today," said Suneet
Singal, chief executive officer and president of the Company.

As previously disclosed by the Company on Forms 8-K, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 26, 2017 and July 6,
2017, the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock
Market LLC notified the Company that the Staff had determined to
delist the Company's securities from Nasdaq based upon its
determination that the Company failed to timely satisfy the
requirements of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5110(a).  The Rule requires an
issuer to file an initial listing application and to satisfy all
requirements for initial listing on Nasdaq prior to and upon the
consummation of a "change of control" transaction, respectively.

Specifically, the Staff asserted that the consummation of the first
phase of the Contribution Agreement by and between the Company and
First Capital Real Estate Operating Partnership, L.P. and First
Capital Real Estate Trust Incorporated on May 17, 2017 constituted
a "change of control" for purposes of the Rule and therefore
required the Company to submit an initial listing application and
to satisfy all requirements for initial listing on Nasdaq on or
before May 17, 2017.  As the Company had not as of that time done
so, the Staff determined to delist the Company's securities from
Nasdaq.

The Company disputed the basis for the Staff's delisting
determination, and requested a hearing before the Panel to address
the matter and to request the continued listing of its common stock
on Nasdaq.  In accordance with the Nasdaq Listing Rules, the
Company's common stock continued to trade on Nasdaq pending the
ultimate outcome of the Panel hearing process.

The Company appeared before the Panel on June 29, 2017.  At the
hearing, the Company asserted that no change of control occurred as
a result of the May 17th Transaction, and therefore maintained that
the Rule should not have been applied to the Company.
Notwithstanding, the Company committed to the Panel that it would
take all necessary steps to timely evidence compliance with the
Rule if and when an actual change of control were to occur in
connection with the completion of additional phases under the
Contribution Agreement with First Capital.  Following the hearing,
on July 5, 2017, the Panel notified the Company that it had
determined to delist the Company's securities from Nasdaq due to
the Company's non-compliance with the Rule.  As a result, trading
in the Company's common stock on Nasdaq was suspended effective
with the opening of business on July 7, 2017.  Upon the suspension
of trading on Nasdaq, the Company's common stock was eligible to
trade in the OTC Markets' "Pink" tier.  Thereafter, on July 24,
2017, the Company's stock began trading on the OTCQB market, a
higher qualitative tier within the OTC Markets system.

On July 20, 2017, the Company appealed the Panel's decision to the
Listing Council.  Throughout the appeal process, which concluded
with the issuance of the Listing Council's decision on Sept. 28,
2017, the Company consistently argued that the May 17th Transaction
did not constitute a change of control for purposes of the Rule (or
otherwise) and, therefore, the Rule should not have been applied to
the Company, the application of which ultimately resulted in the
suspension of trading of the Company's securities on Nasdaq.  The
Listing Council's decision indicated its concurrence with the
Company's position that the May 17th Transaction did not constitute
a change of control for Nasdaq listing purposes and that,
accordingly, the Rule did not apply. Based on the foregoing, the
Listing Council ruled that the Panel erred in its determination to
delist the Company's common stock, and that the Company's common
stock should be allowed to immediately resume trading on Nasdaq
since the Company meets all applicable requirements for continued
listing.

The Company was represented in its appeal by Donohoe Advisory
Associates LLC (www.donohoeadvisory.com).

                      About PhotoMedex

Willow Grove, Pennsylvania-based PhotoMedex, Inc., is a global
health products and services company providing integrated disease
management and aesthetic solutions to dermatologists, professional
aestheticians, ophthalmologists, optometrists, consumers and
patients.  The Company provides proprietary products and services
that address skin conditions including psoriasis, vitiligo, acne,
actinic keratosis, photo damage and unwanted hair, as well as
fixed-site laser vision correction services at its LasikPlus(R)
vision centers.

PhotoMedex reported a loss of $13.26 million in 2016, following a
loss of $34.55 million in 2015.  As of June 30, 2017, PhotoMedex
reported $17.61 million in total assets, $9.73 million in total
liabilities, and $7.87 million in total stockholders' equity.

Fahn Kanne & Co. Grant Thornton Israel, in Tel-Aviv, Israel, issued
a "going concern" opinion on the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that as of Dec. 31, the
Company had an accumulated deficit of $115.6 million and
shareholders' deficit of $1.408 million.  Also, during the most
recent periods the Company has incurred losses and negative cash
flows from continuing operations and was forced to sell certain
assets and business units to obtain additional liquidity resources
to support its operations.  In addition, on Jan. 23, 2017, the
Company completed the sale of its consumer products division which
represented the sale of substantially all of the remaining
operations and assets of the Company.  These conditions, along with
other matters, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern.


PQ CORP: S&P Upgrades CCR to 'B+' on IPO and Debt Repayment
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its corporate credit rating on U.S.-based
PQ Corp. to 'B+' from 'B'. The outlook is stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we raised our issue-level ratings on
the company's senior secured debt to 'BB-' from 'B+'. The recovery
ratings remains '2', indicating our expectation of substantial
(70%-90%; rounded estimate: 85%) recovery in the event of payment
default. We also raised our issue-level rating on the company's
unsecured debt to 'B' from 'B-'. The recovery rating remains '5',
indicating our expectation of modest (10%-30%; rounded estimate:
15%) recovery in the event of payment default.

"The upgrade reflects our expectation that the company will operate
with lower leverage going forward, given the use of proceeds from
the recent IPO repaying nearly 20% of the company's debt.
Additionally, the company's debt service costs have improved, given
the repayment of most of the company's $525 of unsecured
floating-rate notes, which will improve cash flow generation. PQ's
balance sheet debt is being reduced to approximately $2.2 billion
from $2.7 billion given the debt reduction from the IPO proceeds.
If PQ exercises the greenshoe provision, we expect it to use the
additional proceeds to repay additional debt. Pro forma for the
transaction, we expect debt to EBITDA of between 5.0x and 5.5x
(compared with over 6x currently) and weighted-average funds from
operations (FFO) of above 12%. We expect that, given the partial
public ownership, PQ's financial policies will be more conservative
because the company has established a long-term leverage target of
net debt/EBITDA of 3.0x-3.5x.

"The stable rating outlook indicates our expectation that PQ will
continue to reduce debt leverage using free cash flow and maintain
FFO to debt of above 12% and debt to EBITDA of between 4x and 5x
over the next 12 months. We expect PQ to experience modest volume
and EBITDA growth through improved product mix and new products.
Given the company's private equity ownership, we view an unexpected
increase in debt leverage as a risk factor; however, our base case
scenario does not include any significant debt-funded acquisitions
or shareholder rewards.

"We could consider a negative rating action over the next 12 months
if PQ were to pursue any large debt-funded acquisitions or
shareholder rewards, or if we deem CCMP Capital as unsupportive to
the company's overall credit quality. We could also lower the
ratings if FFO to debt were to fall below 12% and if debt to EBITDA
were to exceed 5x on a sustained basis, this could occur if margins
were to deteriorate by 500 basis points (bps) as the result of
weakened product mix. Additionally, we could lower ratings if
liquidity sources were to drop below 1.2x its uses.

"We could consider a positive rating action in the next 12 months
if PQ's sponsors continue to reduce the equity stake below 40% and
if the financial risk profile continues to improve such that debt
to EBITDA approaches 4x and FFO/debt approaches greater than 20%.
This would result if there was a 1,000 bps margin improvement,
driven by new value-added product offerings and an improved product
pricing and mix."


PRECIPIO INC: Elects Two New Members to Board of Directors
----------------------------------------------------------
Precipio, Inc. announced that on Sept. 26, 2017, the Company
elected each of Jeffrey Cossman, MD, and Doug Fisher, MD to the
Board of Directors of the Company to fill existing vacancies on the
Board.  The Board also appointed Dr. Fisher to serve as a member of
the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee of the Board and
appointed Dr. Cossman to serve as a member of the Compensation
Committee and the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee of the Board.

"We are thrilled to appoint both Jeff and Doug to the Board as
their expertise and achievements in their respective fields will
serve to provide stewardship and counsel in our efforts to execute
on the promise that Precipio represents," said Ilan Danieli, CEO of
Precipio.  "Both Jeff and Doug add to the diversity of the
backgrounds of our board members, creating a broad basis of
expertise for myself and my management team to rely on.  I welcome
each of them to the Board and look forward to our fruitful and
highly productive relationships," he added.

"As a cancer physician, I am honored to be part of Precipio, which
promises to improve the lives of those suffering from cancer," said
Dr. Cossman.  "Patients with cancer deserve to have the most
accurate diagnosis leading them to the right treatment.  Precipio
has changed the way this is achieved by giving patients direct,
efficient access to world-class diagnostic experts and
laboratories," he concluded.

"I am excited to join the Precipio team to help bring better care
to patients and improve health outcomes.  Misdiagnoses are a major
issue for cancer patients, and Precipio's unique approach will help
solve this problem," said Dr. Fisher.

Dr. Fisher is currently an executive in Residence at InterWest
Partners LLC, a venture capital firm, where he has worked since
March 2009.  Dr. Fisher also serves as the chief business officer
at Sera Prognostics, Inc., where he has worked since January 2015.
Prior to joining InterWest, Dr. Fisher served as vice president of
New Leaf Venture Partners LLC, a private equity and venture capital
firm, from January 2006 to March 2009.  Prior to joining New Leaf,
Dr. Fisher was a project leader with The Boston Consulting Group,
Inc., a global management consulting firm, from November 2003 to
February 2006.  Dr. Fisher currently serves on the board of Obalon
Therapeutics, Inc., Gynesonics, Inc., and Indi Molecular, Inc. and
previously served on the board of QuatRx Pharmaceuticals Company,
Cardiac Dimensions, PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sera Prognostics,
Inc. Dr. Fisher holds an A.B. and a B.S. from Stanford University,
an M.D. from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and
an M.B.A. from The Wharton School of Business at the University of
Pennsylvania.

Dr. Cossman was a founder of, and served as chief executive officer
and chairman of the Board at, United States Diagnostic Standards,
Inc. from 2009 to 2014 and served as a member of the board of
directors of The Personalized Medicine Coalition from 2008 to 2014.
Prior to that, he served as chief scientific officer and a member
of the board of directors of The Critical Path Institute and as
Medical Director of Gene Logic, Inc.; he was Professor and Chairman
of the Department of Pathology at Georgetown University Medical
Center and held the Oscar Benwood Hunter Chair of Pathology at
Georgetown; he served as Senior Investigator in Hematopathology at
the National Cancer Institute. He is currently a medical advisor to
Epigenomics AG. Dr. Cossman holds a B.S. from the University of
Michigan and an M.D. from the University of Michigan Medical
School. He is board-certified in pathology and trained in pathology
and hematopathology at the University of Michigan, Stanford
University and the National Institutes of Health.

Dr. Fisher and Dr. Cossman will be compensated for their service as
non-employee directors under the Company's policy for non-employee
director compensation described in the Company's Annual Report
filed on April 13, 2017.  In connection with the election of Dr.
Fisher and Dr. Cossman and pursuant to this program, the Company
granted to each of Dr. Fisher and Dr. Cossman an option to purchase
7,000 shares of the Company's common stock under the Company's 2017
Stock Option and Incentive Plan.  The stock options vest monthly
over a period of three years.

                        About Precipio
  
Formerly known as Transgenomic, Inc., Precipio, Inc. --
http://www.precipiodx.com/-- has built a platform designed to
eradicate the problem of misdiagnosis by harnessing the intellect,
expertise and technology developed within academic institutions,
and delivering quality diagnostic information to physicians and
their patients worldwide.  Through its collaborations with
world-class academic institutions specializing in cancer research,
diagnostics and treatment, Precipio offers a new standard of
diagnostic accuracy enabling the highest level of patient care.

Transgenomic reported a net loss available to common stockholders
of $8 million on $1.55 million of net sales for the year ended Dec.
31, 2016, compared with a net loss available to common stockholders
of $34.27 million on $1.92 million of net sales for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2015.

As of June 30, 2017, Precipio had $37.01 million in total assets,
$17.24 million in total liabilities and $19.76 million in total
stockholders' equity.

Marcum LLP, in Hartford, CT, issued a "going concern" qualification
on the consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec.
31, 2016, stating that the Company has incurred operating losses
and used cash for operating activities for the past several years.
This raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


PSIVIDA CORP: Deloitte & Touche LLP Raises Going Concern Doubt
--------------------------------------------------------------
pSivida Corp. filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its annual report on Form 10-K, disclosing a net loss of
$18.48 million on $7.54 million of total revenues for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2017, compared with a net loss of $21.55
million on $1.62 million of total revenues in 2016.

Deloitte & Touche LLP states that the Company's anticipated
recurring use of cash to fund operations in combination with no
probable source of additional capital raises substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company's balance sheet at June 30, 2017, showed $18.68 million
in total assets, $5.34 million in total liabilities, and a total
equity of $13.34 million.

A copy of the Form 10-K is available at:

                        https://is.gd/gJRqq9

                        About pSivida Corp.

Headquartered in Watertown, Mass., pSivida Corp. develops drug
delivery products primarily for the treatment of chronic eye
diseases.  The Company has developed three products for treatment
of back-of-the-eye diseases, which include Medidur for posterior
segment uveitis, its lead product candidate that is in pivotal
Phase III clinical trials; ILUVIEN for diabetic macular edema
(DME), its lead licensed product that is sold in the United States
and European Union (EU) countries, and Retisert.  Medidur is
designed to treat chronic non-infectious uveitis affecting the
posterior segment of the eye (posterior segment uveitis).  ILUVIEN
is an injectable micro-insert that provides treatment of DME from a
single injection.  Retisert is an implant that provides treatment
of posterior segment uveitis.


PUERTO RICO: PREPA Disappointed by Rejection of $1-Bil. Loan Offer
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) Bondholder Group
on Sept. 28, 2017, commented on the statement from the Puerto Rico
Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority ("AAFAF") rejecting
the Bondholder Group members' offer of a debtor in possession (DIP)
financing loan to PREPA including $1 billion in new cash from the
bondholders, as well as relief on existing bonds.

Stephen Spencer of Houlihan Lokey, the PREPA Bondholder Group's
financial advisor, said:

"We are disappointed by AAFAF's and the Governor's outright
rejection of our loan offer without any discussion or
counter-proposal.  We sincerely believed our loan would have helped
PREPA finance its recovery and rebuilding efforts as quickly as
possible in the wake of two terrible hurricanes.

This offer was designed to support PREPA's liquidity with new,
immediate low-cost financing -- with an interest rate set
materially below market -- and substantial debt service relief,
including a permanent reduction in outstanding debt.  After a lack
of communication from PREPA, we wanted to ensure that they knew
funding was available if needed.  Importantly, we believe this
offer would have helped, not hurt, PREPA's ability to obtain
Federal disaster funding relief based on the post-hurricane
recovery experiences of other electric utilities such as Entergy
New Orleans and the Long Island Power Authority, and with expanded
capital, would potentially reduce the time frame to restore power
to the Island.

Our group's members include firms that have had relationships in
Puerto Rico for many decades.  We are all concerned with the
well-being of the Americans that live in Puerto Rico and we
continue to look for ways to engage with the Commonwealth and work
collaboratively in the ongoing recovery effort."

                      About Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico is a self-governing commonwealth in association with
the United States that's facing a massive bond debt of $70 billion,
a 68% debt-to-GDP ratio and negative economic growth in nine of the
last 10 years.

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico has sought bankruptcy protection,
aiming to restructure its massive $74 billion debt-load and $49
billion in pension obligations.

The debt restructuring petition was filed by Puerto Rico's
financial oversight board in U.S. District Court in Puerto Rico
(Case No. 17-01578) on May 3, 2017, and was made under Title III of
2016's U.S. Congressional rescue law known as the Puerto Rico
Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act ("PROMESA").

The Financial Oversight and Management Board later commenced Title
III cases for the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation
(COFINA) on May 5, 2017, and the Employees Retirement System (ERS)
and the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (HTA) on
May 21, 2017.  On July 2, 2017, a Title III case was commenced for
the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority ("PREPA").

U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts has appointed U.S. District Judge
Laura Taylor Swain to oversee the Title III cases.  The Honorable
Judith Dein, a United States Magistrate Judge for the District of
Massachusetts, has been designated to preside over matters that may
be referred to her by Judge Swain, including discovery disputes,
and management of other pretrial proceedings.

Joint administration of the Title III cases, under Lead Case No.
17-3283, was granted on June 29, 2017.

The Oversight Board has hired as advisors, Proskauer Rose LLP and
O'Neill & Borges LLC as legal counsel, McKinsey & Co. as strategic
consultant, Citigroup Global Markets, as municipal investment
banker, and Ernst & Young, as financial advisor.

Martin J. Bienenstock, Esq., Scott K. Rutsky, Esq., and Philip M.
Abelson, Esq., of Proskauer Rose; and Hermann D. Bauer, Esq., at
O'Neill & Borges are on-board as attorneys.

McKinsey & Co. is the Board's strategic consultant, Ernst & Young
is the Board's financial advisor, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
is the Board's municipal investment banker.

Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent.  Prime Clerk
maintains a case web site at:

           https://cases.primeclerk.com/puertorico

Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC is the service agent for ERS, HTA,
and PREPA.

O'Melveny & Myers LLP is counsel to the Commonwealth's Puerto Rico
Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority (AAFAF), the agency
responsible for negotiations with bondholders.

The Oversight Board named Professor Nancy B. Rapoport as fee
examiner and to chair a committee to review professionals' fees.

                      Bondholders' Attorneys

Toro, Colon, Mullet, Rivera & Sifre, P.S.C. and Kramer Levin
Naftalis & Frankel LLP serve as counsel to the Mutual Fund Group,
comprised of mutual funds managed by Oppenheimer Funds, Inc.,
Franklin Advisers, Inc., and the First Puerto Rico Family of Funds,
which collectively hold over $3.5 billion in COFINA Bonds and over
$2.9 billion in other bonds issued by Puerto Rico and other
instrumentalities, including over $1.8 billion of Puerto Rico
general obligation bonds ("GO Bonds").

White & Case LLP and Lopez Sanchez & Pirillo LLC represent the UBS
Family of Funds and the Puerto Rico Family of Funds, which hold
$613.3 million in COFINA bonds.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Robbins, Russell,
Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP, and Jimenez, Graffam &
Lausell are co-counsel to the ad hoc group of General Obligation
Bondholders, comprised of Aurelius Capital Management, LP, Autonomy
Capital (Jersey) LP, FCO Advisors LP, Franklin Mutual Advisers LLC,
Monarch Alternative Capital LP, Senator Investment Group LP, and
Stone Lion Capital Partners L.P.

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and Reichard & Escalera are
co-counsel to the ad hoc coalition of holders of senior bonds
issued by COFINA, comprised of at least 30 institutional holders,
including Canyon Capital Advisors LLC and Varde Investment
Partners, L.P.

Correa Acevedo & Abesada Law Offices, P.S.C., is counsel to Canyon
Capital Advisors, LLC, River Canyon Fund Management, LLC, Davidson
Kempner Capital Management LP, OZ Management, LP, and OZ Management
II LP (the QTCB Noteholder Group).

                           Committees

The U.S. Trustee formed a nine-member Official Committee of
Retirees and a seven-member Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors of the Commonwealth.  The Retiree Committee tapped Jenner
& Block LLP and Bennazar, Garcia & Milian, C.S.P., as its
attorneys.  The Creditors Committee tapped Paul Hastings LLP and
O'Neill & Gilmore LLC as counsel.


QUADRANGLE PROPERTIES: Plan Exclusivity Period Moved to Nov. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Edward Ellington of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Mississippi signed an agreed order:

     -- extending the exclusivity period for Quadrangle
        Properties, Inc. to file a Disclosure Statement and
        Plan of Reorganization until November 1, 2017, and

     -- granting the Debtor a similar extension, in compliance
        with the Bankruptcy Code, to obtain Plan confirmation.

The Debtor is also directed to timely pay all U.S. Trustee's fees
and timely file all monthly reports.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor requested the Court for an additional 90-day extension of
the exclusive periods within which to file a Plan and Disclosure
Statement, and a similar extension to obtain Plan confirmation.

The Debtor told the Court that it has been in negotiations with
various creditors and has been making determinations to allow them
to finalize many matters with regard to a Disclosure Statement and
proposed Plan to be filed.

The Debtor said that no decision has been made by both the Debtor
and its counsel as to whether a sale of assets or pursuit of a plan
of reorganization is the best option for the Debtor. The Debtor
believes it will have a better idea as to its ability to pursue a
meaningful plan of reorganization after the current summer season
has passed.

In addition, the Debtor and Zions First National Bank, its major
secured creditor, have been engaged in meaningful settlement
negotiations with respect to the use of insurance proceeds being
held in escrow for the repair and rehabilitation of those portions
of the Debtor's assets that were damaged by fire prior to the
bankruptcy filing.

The Debtor believes that those negotiations are, and will be,
fruitful and will hopefully lead to either a consensual dismissal
of the case or a consensual plan of reorganization.  However, the
Debtor anticipated that the negotiations will involve a rather
extensive amount of detail with respect to the repair costs. The
Debtor told the Court that it is presently fine-tuning the initial
estimates it obtained for both the full repair of the damages and
the costs for demolition of the damaged portions of its
properties.

                   About Quadrangle Properties

Quadrangle Properties, Inc., headquartered in Jackson, Mississippi,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
S.D. Miss. Case No. 17-01469) on April 18, 2017.  The petition was
signed by R. Don Williams, president.

The Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and
liabilities of $500,000 to $1 million.

The Hon. Edward Ellington presides over the case.

Craig M. Geno, Esq., at the Law Offices of Craig M. Geno, PLLC,
serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.


REVOLUTION ALUMINUM: Carr's To Be Paid in Cash From Property Sale
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Revolution Aluminum Propco, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Louisiana a second amended plan
of liquidation dated Sept. 13, 2017.

Class 3 consists of any allowed secured claim of Carr's Dirt Works
and Pipeline Services, Inc.  Any Allowed Class 3 Claim will be paid
in cash equal to either (1) the allowed amount of its allowed claim
or (2) lesser amount as to which the Class 3 Claimant agrees after
the Effective Date as soon as practicable following the sale of the
land and buildings situated thereon located at 300 Williams Lake
Road, Pineville, Louisiana 71360, in full satisfaction of its
Allowed Class 3 Claim.  If there are insufficient funds available
from the Sale to pay all of the Allowed Class 3 Claim in full, if
and to the extent that the Allowed Class 3 Claim is allowed and
determined to be secured by a valid lien affecting the Property,
then the Effective Date will not occur and confirmation of this
Plan shall be subject to revocation.

The Debtor has retained and the Court has approved, pursuant to
Section 328 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, Beau Box Real Estate, the
licensed real estate broker employed by the Debtor following court
approval to market and sell the Property, as agent to efficiently
market the Debtor's real property and improvements thereon and its
business for the highest and best offer obtainable under current
market conditions.  Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, after
Confirmation, the Agent will continue to have the powers of the
manager of the Debtor, including, but limited to, full power and
authority to continue to market the Debtor's real property and
improvements and its business, to accept, on behalf of the Debtor
and subject to approval of the Court, any offer or offers to
purchase the Debtor's real property and improvements and its
business, and to execute documents as may be necessary or desirable
to consummate any sale or sales approved by the Court.  

On the Confirmation Hearing, the Agent will propose and the Court
will approve the terms of the sale of the Property to be conducted
as soon as practicable after the Confirmation Hearing.  Once the
Agent and a purchaser have entered into an agreement to purchase
the Property, the Agent, acting through Debtor's counsel of record,
will seek approval of the sale from the Court.  Thereafter, a
closing date will be set by the purchaser and the Agent.  

On the Closing, the purchaser will purchase from the estate, and
the Debtor, acting through the Agent, will convey to the Purchaser
the Property in consideration for the highest offer in cash,
provided that the sale is for a sufficient amount to make the
payments required under the Plan to unclassified claims, any
Allowed Class 1 Claim, the Allowed Class 2 Claim, and any Allowed
Class 3 Claim, after payment of all expenses of the sale,
including, but not limited to, any commission due to the Agent.

A copy of the Second Amended Plan is available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/lawb16-81024-346.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on May 23, 2017, the
Debtor filed with the Court a first amended disclosure statement
for the Debtor's first amended plan of liquidation dated May 15,
2017.  That plan proposed that holders of Class 4 Allowed Unsecured
Claims -- estimated at $3,223,067.62 would receive a pro rata
distribution, up to the allowed amount of each Class 4 Claim, from
the proceeds of the sale after the Unclassified Claims and Class 1,
Class 2 and Class 3 Claims have been paid in full.

                 About Revolution Aluminum Propco

Revolution Aluminum Propco, LLC is a Louisiana company established
in 2015.  It owns a real property comprised of approximately 1,400
acres in Pineville, Louisiana.  The property, which is the
Company's sole asset, is an industrial park and the former site of
a paper mill.

Revolution Aluminum Propco is 100% owned by its parent company,
Revolution Aluminum LLC, and is managed by Roger Boggs.

Ryan & Associates, Inc., Engineered Products, Inc., and Tina J.
Hertzel filed an involuntary Chapter 11 case (Bankr. W.D. La., Case
No. 16-81024) against Revolution Aluminum Propco on Sept. 15, 2016.
The Court entered an order officially placing the Debtor in
bankruptcy on Feb. 1, 2017.

The petitioning creditors are represented by Bradley L. Drell,
Esq., at Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell.  

Steffes, Vingiello & McKenzie, LLC serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor hired Beau Box Real Estate as real
estate broker and manager.

On March 16, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee hired
Gold Weems Bruser Sues & Rundell, APLC, as counsel.


REVOLUTION ALUMINUM: DOJ Watchdog Names L. Sikes as Trustee
-----------------------------------------------------------
Henry G. Hobbs, Jr., the Acting United States Trustee for Region 5,
asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of
Louisiana to approve the appointment of Lucy Sikes as Trustee in
the bankruptcy case of Revolution Aluminum Propco, LLC.

To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, the Trustee does not have
connections with the debtor, creditors, any other parties in
interest, their respective attorneys and accountants, the United
States Trustee, and the persons employed in the Office of the
United States Trustee, as stated by Ms. Sikes.

Office of the United States Trustee:

     Richard Drew
     Trial Attorney
     300 Fannin Street, Suite 3196
     Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
     Telephone no. (318) 676-3456
     Direct telephone no. (318) 676-3484
     Facsimile no. (318) 676-3212
     LA Bar no. 32434

               About Revolution Aluminum Propco

Revolution Aluminum Propco, LLC, is a Louisiana company established
in 2015.  It owns a real property comprised of approximately 1,400
acres in Pineville, Louisiana.  The property, which is the
Company's sole asset, is an industrial park and the former site of
a paper mill.

Revolution Aluminum Propco is 100% owned by its parent company,
Revolution Aluminum LLC, and is managed by Roger Boggs.

Ryan & Associates, Inc., Engineered Products, Inc., and Tina J.
Hertzel filed an involuntary Chapter 11 case (Bankr. W.D. La., Case
No. 16-81024) against Revolution Aluminum Propco on Sept. 15, 2016.
The Court entered an order officially placing the Debtor in
bankruptcy on Feb. 1, 2017.

The petitioning creditors are represented by Bradley L. Drell,
Esq., at Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell.  

Steffes, Vingiello & McKenzie, LLC, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor hired Beau Box Real Estate as real
estate broker and manager.

On March 16, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee hired
Gold Weems Bruser Sues & Rundell, APLC, as counsel.


RIVERSTONE UTOPIA: S&P Gives Prelim BB Rating on $225MM Term Loan B
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it assigned its preliminary 'BB'
issue-level rating to Riverstone Utopia Member LLC's $225 million
term loan B due 2024. The rating outlook is stable. The preliminary
recovery rating is a '2', implying a substantial (70%-90%; rounded
estimate: 70%) recovery for lenders in the event of a borrower
default.

The rating reflects the highly contracted nature of the pipeline,
the favorable market position of the project in the Marcellus and
Utica basins, the experience of Kinder Morgan as developer and
operator of the project, and a minimum DSCR of 1.19x in 2028 when
assuming the issuance of $50 million of permitted additional debt
at the borrower ($30 million) and KMUH ($20 million).

The proposed outlook is stable. The project is nearing substantial
completion and is expected to enter full operations by the end of
the year. Once operational, initially all cash flow will be derived
from the 21-year remaining term TSA with Nova Chemicals, which will
use the ethane as feedstock in its Corunna ethylene plant. S&P
expects the project to reach commercial operations as scheduled and
Nova to take (or pay) for the capacity as set out in the TSA.

S&P said, "Although unlikely, we could take a negative rating
action if there is weaker than expected cash flow due to
difficulties experienced by Nova Chemicals or reduced coverage
rations following the issuance of permitted additional debt.  Also,
a negative ratings action might result from Mova Chemicals not
posting the required credit enhancement under the TSA or if it
seeks to get out of its obligations under the TSA for whatever
reason. Also, if the permitted additional debt at KMUH is issued
and materially affects the rated debt, we may apply a one notch
downgrade due to this structural subordination.

"We could take a positive rating action if the project's capacity
is increased sooner than expected and the additional cash flow is
used to prepay the debt more quickly than forecast. However, we do
not expect a material change over the next 18-24 months."


ROGERS & SON: Seeks December 31 Exclusive Plan Filing Extension
---------------------------------------------------------------
Rogers & Son Lawn Care & Landscaping, LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania for an extension of
the exclusivity period within which the Debtor must file a Chapter
11 Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement to December 31,
2017.

The Debtor has obtained approval from the Court to restructure all
of its secured debt.  Consequently, the Debtor contends that it is
still in the process of gauging its anticipated seasonal levels of
revenue and expenses to determine its ability to pay its secured
debt, its overhead and expenses and return a dividend to its
general, unsecured creditors.  But the Debtor needs additional time
to do so.

Rogers & Son believes that it would be in the best interest of both
the Debtor and its creditors if exclusivity period to file a
Chapter 11 Plan and Disclosure Statement were extended until
December 31, 2017.

                   About Rogers & Son Lawn Care

Rogers & Son Lawn Care & Landscaping, LLC DBA Affordable Tree
Services, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. M.D.Pa.
Case No. 17-00367) on Feb. 1, 2017.  The Petition was signed by its
sole member, Norman R. Rogers.  The Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities ranging from $100,000 to $500,000.  Lawrence V. Young,
Esq., at CGA Law Firm, serves as bankruptcy counsel.


SAILING EMPORIUM: Sale of Marina Property to Brawner for $3.8M OK'd
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas J. Catliota of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland authorized The Sailing Emporium, Inc., and
William Arthur Willis and Mary Sue Willis, and Brawner Co., Inc.,
to sell the real property, personal property, goodwill and other
intangibles relating to the Marina operations in Rock Hall,
Maryland, outside the ordinary course of business for $3,800,000.

On Sept. 7, 2017, an Auction of the Marina Property was conducted
at which time the Debtors determined that the offer of Brawner to
purchase the Marina Property for $3,800,000 was the highest and
best offer, pursuant to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated
Sept. 11, 2017.  The Debtors selected the offer of Derecktor
Chesapeake, LLC to purchase the Marina Property for $3,650,000 as
the successful back-up offer for the Marina Property.

The sale is free and clear of all Interests of any kind or nature
whatsoever.

At Closing on the Transaction, the People's Bank will be paid its
allowed claim consisting of all unpaid principal and accrued and
outstanding interest due as of the date of Closing that is secured
by the Marina Property, plus pre-petition late charges in the
amount of $10,789, pre-petition insurance in the amount of $7,328,
pre-petition attorneys' fees in the amount of $22,767 with the
balance of the Bank's claim, including post-petition fees and
expenses, to be held by the Title Company or Sailing Emporium's
counsel pending further Order of the Court.

All personal property used, or held for use, in the operations of
the Marina with the exception of the personal property set forth in
the Order will be conveyed to the Purchaser at Closing.

The Order will be effective as a determination that, as of the
Closing, all Interests of any kind or nature whatsoever existing as
to the Marina Property prior to the Closing have been
unconditionally released, discharged and terminated, and that the
conveyances described herein have been effected.

Any contract that is not specifically included in the Brawner
Agreement or provided for in this Order will be rejected.  For
clarity, the Marine Promissory Note and Security Agreement for the
1996 Markley's Marina, Inc. custom boat (HIN# MVU35011J595) with
Branch Banking & Trust Co. ("BB&T") is rejected and the boat will
be turned over to BB&T in accordance with its contract terms or as
otherwise agreed.

Notwithstanding the foregoing and anything to the contrary in the
Order, and subject to and conditioned upon the payment of $45,000
by the Purchaser to m2 Lease Funds, LLC before or simultaneously
with Closing ("Purchaser Lift Payment") and the payment of $10,000
by Sailing Emporium to m2 before or simultaneously with Closing,
the Debtors' assumption and assignment of the m2 Lease to the
Purchaser free and clear of all Interests is approved.  There will
be no fees charged to the Purchaser or the Debtors as a result of
the assumption and assignment of the m2 Lease.

The Willises, as the owners of adjacent Parcel 13, will grant and
convey any and all riparian rights they hold to Parcel 23 and the
Marina, which documentation will be recorded in the land records.
They will execute any and all documents necessary to grant
Purchaser an easement for, among other things, the ownership,
operation, repair, replacement and/or relocation of, the existing
sewer line across Parcel 13.

At the Transaction Closing, the Debtors are  authorized and
directed to use the Proceeds to pay (or, as applicable, credit) the
following: (i) Real Estate Taxes (estimated but not to be paid) -
$94,703; (ii) Recordation Tax (estimated but not to be paid) -
$25,080; (iii) Transfer Tax (estimated but not to be paid) -
$38,000; (iv) Broker Fee - $133,000; (v) Deed and Deed Prep
(estimated) - $1,000; (vi) Premium and fees for title examination
and title insurance - TBD; (vii) Sailing Emporium Lift Payment -
$10,000; (viii) UST Fee - $10,400; (ix) Break-Up Fee due to
Derecktor per Order entered at Dkt. # 184 - $114,000; and (x) The
Peoples Bank - $2,457,560 (plus per diem contract interest until
Closing).  

Notwithstanding the provisions of Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and
6006(d), and consistent with Bankruptcy Code Section 363(m), the
Order will not be stayed and it will be effective and enforceable
immediately upon its entry.  Time is of the essence in closing the
transactions referenced or contemplated thereby, and the Debtors
and the Purchaser intend to close the Transaction no sooner than
five days after entry of the Order and no later than 45 days after
the Order becomes a final order.

If Brawner fails to consummate the Closing of the Transaction
contemplated in the Brawner Agreement, the Debtors are authorized
to consummate the Transaction with Derecktor pursuant to the
Derecktor Agreement filed with the Court on July 17, 2017 as
amended by the terms and conditions agreed to at the Auction,
without further order of the Court.

A copy of the Brawner Agreement attached to the Order is available
for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Sailing_Emporium_235_Order.pdf

                    About The Sailing Emporium

The Sailing Emporium, Inc., owns and operates a full service marina
located on the picturesque Eastern Shore of Maryland on eight acres
on Rock Hall Harbor in Rock Hall, Maryland.  Services include boat
sales, boat repair and restoration, electronics sales and service
and sailboat charters.  The Property also includes a marine store
and nautical gift shop.  The Property has 155 deep water slips and
20 transient slips, and the landscaped grounds and other amenities
have made this marina a point of interest in Rock Hall.

The Sailing Emporium, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Md. Case No. 16-24498) on Nov. 1, 2016.  The petition was signed by
William Arthur Willis, president.  The Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million at the time of the
filing.

The case is assigned to Judge Thomas J. Catliota.

The Debtor's counsel is Lisa Yonka Stevens, Esq., at Yumkas,
Vidmar, Sweeney & Mulrenin, LLC.  The Debtor has employed Andrew
Cantor and Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services as
broker, and tapped Gary T. Mott & Associates, CPA, P.A., as
accountant.


SAXON ENGINEERING: Case Summary & 19 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Saxon Engineering, Inc.
           dba Saxon Technologies
        6946 Signat Drive
        Houston, TX 77041

Type of Business:     Saxon Technologies is computer numerical
                      control (CNC) machining company located
                      within Houston, Texas.  The Company's
                      team of engineers specializes in CNC
                      machining of complex 3-Dimensional
                      components for many industries including
                      petroleum, defense, aerospace, medical and
                      prototype development.  Saxon Technologies'
                      machining equipment, inspection facilities,
                      storage spaces and workspaces are located
                      within its new state-of-the-art climate
                      controlled machining facility.  The
                      Company's engineers have experience working
                      with a limitless variety of materials to
                      suit any industry including exotic materials
                      such as inconel, and titanium; as well as
                      many common materials such as plastics,
                      aluminum, brass and mild steel.  For more
                      information, please visit the Company's Web
                      site at http://www.saxontechnologies.com

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 3, 2017

Case No.: 17-35676

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas (Houston)

Judge: Hon. Jeff Bohm

Debtor's Counsel: Warren J Fields, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF WARREN J. FIELDS
                  P.O. Box 809
                  Houston, TX 77492
                  Tel: 281-496-3030
                  Fax: 832-202-2341
                  E-mail: wfields@wfields-law.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Steven Smith, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, along with a list of
19 largest unsecured creditors, is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-35676.pdf


SCIENTIFIC GAMES: Proposes Private Offering of $350M Senior Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Scientific Games Corporation's wholly owned subsidiary, Scientific
Games International, Inc., intends, subject to market and other
conditions, to commence an offering of $350.0 million of senior
secured notes due 2025 in a private offering.

Scientific Games intends to use the net proceeds of the Notes
offering, together with cash on hand and borrowings under the
Company's existing revolving credit facility, to finance the
Company's pending acquisition of NYX Gaming Group Limited and its
subsidiaries, including the refinancing of certain indebtedness of
NYX, and to pay related fees and expenses.  The offering of the
Notes is not conditioned upon the consummation of the NYX
Acquisition.  If the NYX Acquisition is not consummated for any
reason, the Company intends to use the net proceeds from the
offering of the Notes for general corporate purposes, which may
include the prepayment of term loan borrowings under the Company's
existing credit agreement.

The Notes will be guaranteed on a senior basis by Scientific Games
and certain of its subsidiaries.  The Notes will be secured by
liens on the same collateral that secures indebtedness under
Scientific Games' existing credit agreement and SGI's 7.000% senior
secured notes due 2022.

The Notes will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or any state securities laws and, unless so registered,
may not be offered or sold in the United States except pursuant to
an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act and applicable state securities laws.  The Notes
will be offered only to qualified institutional buyers in
accordance with Rule 144A and to non-U.S. Persons under Regulation
S under the Securities Act.

                      About Scientific Games

Las Vegas, Nevada-based Scientific Games Corporation (NASDAQ: SGMS)
-- http://www.scientificgames.com/-- is a developer of
technology-based gaming systems, table games, table products and
instant ticket games and content for gaming, lottery and
interactive markets.  Scientific Games delivers what customers and
players value most: trusted security, creative content, operating
efficiencies and innovative technology.  The Company offers
customers a fully integrated portfolio of technology platforms,
robust systems, engaging content and unrivaled professional
services.

Scientific Games reported a net loss of $353.7 million in 2016, a
net loss of $1.39 billion in 2015 and a net loss of $234.3 million
in 2014.

As of June 30, 2017, Scientific Games had $7.06 billion in total
assets, $9.06 billion in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $2 billion.

                          *    *    *

In September 2017, Moody's Investors Service placed the rating of
Scientific Games, including the 'B2' Corporate Family Rating, on
review for downgrade following the company's announcement that it
has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire NYX Gaming Group
Limited (NYX) for approximately US$631 million.

In July 2017, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its ratings on Scientific
Games, including its 'B' corporate credit rating.  The outlook is
stable.  "The affirmation of our 'B' corporate credit rating
reflects our expectation for adjusted EBITDA coverage of interest
to remain around 2x through 2018 and for the company to prioritize
the use of free cash flow for debt repayment, which we believe
partially mitigates currently high leverage.  We are forecasting
adjusted debt to EBITDA to be in the low- to mid-7x area in 2017
and around 7x in 2018, given our forecast for only modest EBITDA
growth and debt reduction."


SEARS CANADA: Seeks Extension of Stay Period to Nov. 7
------------------------------------------------------
Sears Canada Inc. announced that it and certain of its subsidiaries
has filed motion materials regarding a number of orders it will
seek from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List)
on Oct. 4, 2017, including approval of transactions in respect of
11 of its leased retail store locations, one leased fulfillment
centre, one of its owned properties, and two going-concern
transactions for certain business sections of the Company.  The
Company will also be seeking an extension of the stay period to
Nov. 7, 2017.

During the stay period, Sears Canada is continuing to operate its
retail stores and website at sears.ca, featuring new Fall and
Holiday apparel, accessories and home fashions as it continues its
restructuring efforts and continues to serve Canadians with great
quality products at outstanding prices.

On Aug. 31, 2017, the Sale Advisor and the Monitor received a
potential going concern bid put forward by Brandon Stranzl,
executive chairman of Sears Canada.  The Initial Management Bid had
numerous conditions, including financing and due diligence
conditions.  Mr. Stranzl provided an amended bid on Sept. 25, 2017.
Understanding, among other components, the role a successful bid
could play in saving jobs, Sears Canada advisors continue to engage
with Mr. Stranzl with the goal of enhancing the value and reducing
the conditionality of the proposed transaction.

Real Property Transactions

The Company has entered into a number of Lease Surrender Agreements
and a Lease Amending Agreement that will result in the exit of the
retail locations, subject to various closing conditions including
the approval of the Court.  Details regarding associated
liquidation sales are being developed and will be communicated in
due course, but it is contemplated that the liquidation sales will
generally occur over the coming months.  The retail locations
listed below currently employ approximately 1,200 employees.  The
Company has also entered into an agreement of purchase and sale
relating to its Garden City location in Winnipeg, and has entered
into a Lease Transfer Agreement relating to the small-parcel
fulfillment centre in Calgary.  Further details regarding each
agreement are included in the respective motion materials that will
be available on the Monitor's website at
http://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/searscanada.

   Sears Full-Line                            Sears Home
   Nanaimo North Town Centre, BC              Kelowna, BC
   Brentwood Town Centre, Burnaby, BC
   Kelowna, BC
   Polo Park, Winnipeg, MB
   Lime Ridge Mall, Hamilton, ON
   Oakville Place, Oakville ON
   Fairview Mall, North York, ON
   Scarborough Town Centre, ON
   Fairview Pointe-Claire, QC
   Avalon Mall, St. John's, NL

Contemplated Transactions

Sears Canada has filed motion materials regarding two transactions
where it is contemplated that the new owners would continue to
operate the businesses.  Purchase prices were not disclosed.  The
transactions are subject to a variety of closing conditions,
including approval of the Court:

   * S.L.H. Transport Inc. / Transports S.L.H. Inc. - SLH provides
     domestic and cross-border truckload delivery and freight
     management services within North America, both to Sears
     Canada and to various third-party customers.  Sears Canada
     has entered into an asset purchase agreement regarding SLH
     with an affiliate of C.A.T. Inc. where it is contemplated
     that the majority of SLH's employees (including those
     employed by SLH's subsidiary, 168886 Canada Inc.) will
     receive firm offers of employment from the new owners.

   * Sears Canada Home Improvements Business - The three
     businesses under this umbrella are Sears Oil Services, Sears
     Heating and Cooling and Sears Duct Cleaning.  Confort Experts
     has been operating the Home Improvements Business on Sears
     Canada's behalf for the past several years, and all of the
     employees of the Home Improvements Business are employed
     directly by Confort.  Sears Canada has entered into an asset
     purchase agreement for portions of the Home Improvements
     Business with Confort where it is contemplated that there
     would be a seamless continuation of service for the Home
     Improvements Business customers, as follows:

        + Sears Oil Services - Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick,
          Nova Scotia, PEI and Newfoundland and Labrador

        + Sears Heating & Cooling - Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova
          Scotia, PEI and Newfoundland and Labrador

        + Sears Duct Cleaning - Select markets in Quebec

Further details regarding each contemplated transaction are
included in the respective motion materials that will be available
on the Monitor's website at
http://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/searscanada.

Additional Information

The Sears Canada Group was granted an Initial Order and protection
under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act on June 22, 2017.
The stay period has been extended to Oct. 4, 2017.  The Sears
Canada Group received the Court's approval of a SISP to seek out
proposals for the acquisition of, or investment in, the Sears
Canada Group's business, assets and/or leases, and to implement one
or a combination of proposals.

Copies of the Company's motion materials are available on the
Monitor's website at http://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/searscanada.
Information regarding the CCAA process may also be obtained by
calling the Monitor's hotline at 416-649-8113 or 1-855-649-8113
(toll free), or by email at searscanada@fticonsulting.com.  Sears
Canada will continue to provide updates regarding its restructuring
as developments warrant.

                      About Sears Canada

Sears Canada Inc. is an independent Canadian digital and
store-based retailer and technology company whose head office is
based in Toronto. Sears Canada's unique brand format offers premium
quality Sears Label products, designed and sourced by Sears Canada,
and of-the-moment fashion and home décor from designer labels in
The Cut @ Sears.  Sears Canada also has a top ranked appliance and
mattress business in Canada.  Sears Canada is undergoing a
reinvention, including new customer experiences at every
touchpoint, a new e-commerce platform, new store concepts, and a
new set of customer service principles designed to deliver WOW
experiences to customers.  Information can be found at
sears.ca/reinvention.  Sears Canada operates as a separate entity
from its U.S.- based co-founder, now known as Sears Holdings Corp.
based in Illinois.

The Company's balance sheet as of April 29, 2017, showed total
assets of C$1.187 billion against total liabilities of C$1.107
billion.

Amid mounting losses and liquidity constraints Sears Canada and
certain of its subsidiaries on June 22, 2017, applied to the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) for protection
under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA"), in order
to continue to restructure its business.

Sears Canada and its subsidiaries on June 22, 2017, were granted an
order (the "Initial Order") under the Companies' Creditors
Arrangement Act (the "CCAA").  Pursuant to the Initial Order, FTI
Consulting has been appointed Monitor.  Sears Canada and certain of
its subsidiaries have obtained orders from the Ontario Superior
Court of Justice (Commercial List) extending the stay period
provided by the Initial Order to Oct. 4, 2017, under the Companies'
Creditors Arrangement Act.

The Company has engaged BMO Capital Markets, as financial advisor,
and Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, as legal advisor.  The Board of
Directors and the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of
the Company has retained Bennett Jones LLP, as legal advisor.

FTI Consulting is the Court-appointed monitor.  The Monitor tapped
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP as counsel.


SEARS CANADA: Will Seek OK for Corbeil Electrique Transaction
-------------------------------------------------------------
Sears Canada Inc. said that it and certain of its subsidiaries have
filed motion materials regarding an additional order it will seek
from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) on
Oct. 4, 2017, in connection with a going-concern transaction for
the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Corbeil Electrique Inc., a
specialty retailer of major appliances, headquartered in Montreal,
Quebec.

Under the asset purchase agreement with the buyer, Am-Cam
Electromenagers Inc., the buyer intends to continue to operate the
Corbeil business including Corbeil's franchise network of stores.
The transaction is expected to result in the continued employment
of at least 90% of Corbeil's corporate employees as well as the
continued employment of the employees located in its franchised
locations.

Sears Canada continues to operate its retail stores and website at
sears.ca, featuring new Fall and Holiday apparel, accessories and
home fashions as it continues its restructuring efforts and
continues to serve Canadians with great quality products at
outstanding prices.

The transaction is subject to a variety of closing conditions,
including approval of the Court.  Further details regarding the
contemplated transaction are included in the motion material that
will be available on the Monitor's website at
http://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/searscanada.

Additional Information

The Sears Canada Group was granted an Initial Order and protection
under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act on June 22, 2017.
The stay period has been extended to Oct. 4, 2017.  The Sears
Canada Group received the Court's approval of a SISP to seek out
proposals for the acquisition of, or investment in, the Sears
Canada Group's business, assets and/or leases, and to implement one
or a combination of proposals.

Copies of the Company's motion materials are available on the
Monitor's Web site at
http://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/searscanada. Information
regarding the CCAA process may also be obtained by calling the
Monitor's hotline at 416-649-8113 or 1-855-649-8113 (toll free), or
by email at searscanada@fticonsulting.com.  Sears Canada will
continue to provide updates regarding its restructuring as
developments warrant.

                         About Am-Cam

Established in June 1992, Am-Cam Electromenagers Inc. is an
independent Canadian company whose head office is based in Laval,
QC.  Am-Cam is the holding of Distinctive Appliances Inc.  With a
diverse product line-up ranging from mid to high end European and
North American appliances, the company has grown successfully over
the past 25 years to become one of the most innovative, influential
and recognized distributors in the premium home appliance industry.
Leveraging a robust infrastructure and strong logistics to support
its discerning clientele, from end consumers to the most
trendsetting builders and designers, the company has become the
state-of-the-art point of reference in independent distribution in
Canada.  Information can be found at
http://www.distinctive-online.com/

                       About Sears Canada

Sears Canada Inc. is an independent Canadian digital and
store-based retailer and technology company whose head office is
based in Toronto.  Sears Canada's unique brand format offers
premium quality Sears Label products, designed and sourced by Sears
Canada, and of-the-moment fashion and home decor from designer
labels in The Cut @ Sears.  Sears Canada also has a top ranked
appliance and mattress business in Canada.  Sears Canada is
undergoing a reinvention, including new customer experiences at
every touchpoint, a new e-commerce platform, new store concepts,
and a new set of customer service principles designed to deliver
WOW experiences to customers.  Information can be found at
sears.ca/reinvention. Sears Canada operates as a separate entity
from its U.S.- based co-founder, now known as Sears Holdings Corp.
based in Illinois.

The Company's balance sheet as of April 29, 2017, showed total
assets of C$1.187 billion against total liabilities of C$1.107
billion.

Amid mounting losses and liquidity constraints Sears Canada and
certain of its subsidiaries on June 22, 2017, applied to the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) for protection
under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA"), in order
to continue to restructure its business.

Sears Canada and its subsidiaries on June 22, 2017, were granted an
order (the "Initial Order") under the Companies' Creditors
Arrangement Act (the "CCAA").  Pursuant to the Initial Order, FTI
Consulting has been appointed Monitor.  Sears Canada and certain of
its subsidiaries have obtained orders from the Ontario Superior
Court of Justice (Commercial List) extending the stay period
provided by the Initial Order to Oct. 4, 2017, under the Companies'
Creditors Arrangement Act.

The Company has engaged BMO Capital Markets, as financial advisor,
and Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, as legal advisor.  The Board of
Directors and the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of
the Company has retained Bennett Jones LLP, as legal advisor.  FTI
Consulting is the Court-appointed monitor.  The Monitor tapped
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP as counsel.


SHADRACH MESHACH: Unsecureds to Recoup Up to 5% Under Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Alabama an amended disclosure
statement dated Sept. 18, 2017, referring to the Debtor's amended
plan of liquidation dated Sept. 18, 2017.

Class 3 General Unsecured Claims are impaired under the Plan.  The
total amount of unsecured claims exceeds $2.1 million.  The claims
are of every kind and nature including claims arising from the
rejection of executory contracts, unexpired lease claims,
deficiencies on secured claims, contract damage claims or open
account claims and damages arising from or related to any
liquidated or contingent claim.  Holders of general unsecured
claims without priority which are Allowed Claims as determined on
or before the Effective Date of the Plan will be paid on a pro rata
basis from a pool of funds created from the distribution of 5% of
the proposed purchaser's pre-tax profit for a period of three
years.  In addition to this amount the pool will also consist of
the collection of accounts receivables which belong to the Debtor.
This distribution is estimated to be approximately $75,000.  

The Debtor believes that a distribution to Allowed General
Unsecured Creditors from this pool of funds would result in an
approximate distribution of 4 to 5% of the amount of each claim.
This amount may increase depending upon the disallowance of certain
unsecured claims.

Prepetition, the Debtor negotiated an asset purchase and sale
agreement with Roots Multiclean, Ltd., to purchase certain assets
of the Debtor.  The Debtor is satisfied that its efforts have
resulted in the highest price available for the assets to be sold
to Roots.  On June 29, 2017, the Debtor filed its amended motion to
sell substantially all of the Debtor's operating assets and
intellectual property free and clear of liens, claims, interests,
and encumbrances.  The sale process described in the motion is
incorporated into this Plan.

The offer from Roots is subject to any higher bids.  Without
limiting the terms of a contract, each of the agreements must
provide that (i) the purchase price will be "all cash" payable at
the closing and (ii) the bidder's obligation to close will not be
conditioned upon obtaining acquisition financing, the completion of
any additional due diligence with respect to the assets to be sold
or any other contingency, other than the approval by the Court.  

Any subsequent offer must include in the bid an additional amount
of $50,000 for bid protection which Debtor would seek to grant to
Roots as a stalking horse.  In the event that Roots was not the
successful bidder, the Debtor will seek court permission for Roots
to be paid the sum of $50,000 as a breakup fee.  Additionally, in
the event there is a subsequent offer made, then the Sale
Procedures will apply except that all interested parties would
receive information about a new date and location for the auction.


The proceeds of the Sale of the Assets will be the primary means of
funding for the Plan.  The Plan Administrator will use the proceeds
from the Sale to the Allowed Claims for Administrative, Priority,
Secured and General Unsecured Creditors.

Shadrach filed its initial plan on August 17, which provides a
mechanism for completing the liquidation of its assets and
distributing the net liquidation proceeds.  The liquidating plan
proposed to pay creditors holding Class 3 general unsecured claims
from the pool of funds that remain after payment of the
administrative, priority and secured claims.  Moreover, general
unsecured creditors would share, based on a pro rata basis, in the
distribution of 5% of the proposed buyer's pre-tax profit for a
period of three years.

The proceeds generated from the sale of the company's assets will
be the primary funding for the plan, according to its initial
disclosure statement.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb17-81731-122.pdf

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available for free
at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb17-81731-96.pdf

              About Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego

Formerly known as Victory Sweepers, Inc., Shadrach, Meshach &
Abednego, Inc., is an industrial vacuum equipment supplier in
Madison, Alabama.  Founded in 2006 by Mark Schwarze, the company is
primarily in the sweeper manufacturing business.  Its first
product, introduced in 2007, was a twin-engine parking area sweeper
dubbed the 'Mark II.'

Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
N.D. Ala. Case No. 17-81731) on June 9, 2017, disclosing assets at
$984,170 and liabilities at $3.64 million.  The petition was signed
by Mark R. Schwarze, president.

Judge Clifton R. Jessup Jr. is assigned to the case.

Kevin D. Heard, and Angela S. Ary at Heard, Ary & Dauro, LLC,
serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


SIGEL'S BEVERAGES: Wants to Spend Cash Collateral for Store Repairs
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Sigel's Beverages, L.P., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas to approve its proposed agreement with
the Thompson Entities -- Mobile City Limited Partnership and The
Florida Company -- concerning the extension of the automatic
rejection deadline for Stores # 11 and 12.

The Debtor also seeks authorization to use cash collateral to pay
$40,000 in post-petition, administrative rent to the Thompson
Entities for the month of November 2016 and to spend, up to
$100,000, in cash collateral to make repairs at Stores #11 and #12,
to the extent such repairs are required under their respective
lease agreements with the Thompson Entities.

On Dec. 5, 2016, the Court entered its final order authorizing use
of cash collateral, which use of cash collateral expired on Dec.
31, 2016.  The Debtor continues to use cash collateral pursuant to
a series of agreed orders by and between the Debtor and PNC Bank,
NA.  The most recent agreed order regarding continued use of cash
collateral was entered on Sept. 12, 2017, as well as an announced
agreement concerning the use of cash collateral through Oct. 27,
2017, for which an order has yet to be entered.

The Debtor asserts that PNC Bank is adequately protected by (i) a
significant equity cushion of over 30% of its total debt, (ii) the
replacement liens proposed and (iii) the fact that the use of their
cash collateral will enhance and protect the value of their
Collateral.

On May 23, 2017, the Court has also entered its order, which
granted the Debtor's Motion to Assume in part, but reserved
assumption of the leases with Mobile City and the Florida Company
for a subsequent hearing.  As a result of a series of agreements
and stipulations between the Debtor and the Thompson Entities, the
Thompson Entities have agreed to extend the Section 365(d)(4)(A)
automatic rejection of the two leases to the earlier of Oct. 27,
2017 or the hearing setting on the Motion to approve the terms and
request to use cash collateral.

After Oct. 27, 2017, however, the Thompson Entities have agreed to
further extend the automatic rejection deadline to Nov. 13, 2017 on
following terms:

     (a) The Debtor will pay outstanding administrative rent to the
Thompson Entities for November 2016 in the amount of $40,000 upon
entry of an order of the Court approving the use of cash
collateral;

     (b) The Debtor will receive authorization to spend up to
$100,000 of cash collateral to make repairs at Stores #11 and #12
to the extent such repairs are required under their respective
lease agreements with the Thompson Entities, with the nature of the
repairs to be agreed upon by the Thompson Entities;

     (c) On or before Nov. 13, 2017, the Debtor will file:

        (i) a motion seeking Court approval of a proposed sale of
the Debtor's assets that contemplates the assumption and assignment
of the Thompson Entities' leases to a purchaser satisfactory to the
Thompson Entities, and

        (ii) a motion pursuant to Rule 9019 seeking approval of a
settlement by and between the Debtor, the proposed purchaser, and
the Thompson Entities with the following material terms:

           A. Purchaser will acquire the unsecured claims of the
Landlords and Joe C. Thompson Jr. for $750K cash at the closing of
the sale;

           B. All outstanding Administrative Expense Claims,
including October stub rent claims owed to the Thompson Entities
and Joe C. Thompson, Jr. will be Allowed;

           C. The assumption and assignment of the Leases to New
Purchaser, including the assumption and assignment of all
outstanding repair, upkeep, remodeling, and/or maintenance
obligations by the New Purchaser;

           D. Mobile City will enter into a lease amendment with
New Purchaser providing for: (a) rent to transition to the higher
of 6% of gross sales or $10,000 immediately upon: Rockwall going
wet and gross sales at the store falling below $276k in a month
(with the 1% wholesale payment to remain in place); and (b) One
additional five-year extension option for store #12 (for a total of
3 five year extensions for Store #12);

           E. The Florida Company will enter into a lease amendment
with New Purchaser providing for one 10-year extension option
exercisable at the end of the current lease term along with one
additional 5-year option.

           F. Releases by the Debtor and its estate of all claims
against the Thompson Entities and Joe C. Thompson, Jr.

           G. An agreement that neither the Debtor's existing
equity-holders nor their direct or indirect affiliates will receive
any payments or distributions (on account of their equity) either
in connection with the sale or otherwise from the purchaser or any
of the purchaser's affiliates except as may be explicitly disclosed
in connection with the entry into this settlement agreement.  The
Debtor's existing equity-holders will likewise not receive any
payment or distribution pursuant to a plan, structured dismissal,
or any similar circumstance.

The Thompson Entities further agree to extend the Section 365(d)(4)
automatic rejection deadline to the earlier of Dec. 6, 2017 or
entry of an order approving the sale motion, provided that these
motions are timely filed by Nov. 13, 2017.

But these extensions of the Section 365(d)(4) deadline will
immediately terminated upon the occurrence of any of the following:


     (a) The filing of a chapter 11 plan by the Debtor or any
insider of the Debtor that is not acceptable to the Thompson
Entities in all respects;

     (b) The confirmation of a chapter 11 plan that is not
acceptable to the Thompson Entities in all respects; and

     (c) The filing of a sale motion that is not acceptable to the
Thompson Entities in all respects.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Sept. 26, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/zeUq82

                     About Sigel's Beverage

Sigel's Beverage, L.P., is a 111-year-old distributor and
wholesaler of fine wines and spirits.  It is one of the largest
local distributors of alcohol in the Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex.
In addition to its wholesale division, it also operates 10 retail
store locations in the Metroplex.

Sigel's Beverage, L.P., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 16-34118) on Oct. 20,
2016.  Anthony J. Bandiera, chief executive officer of Milan
General Investments, Inc., general partner of the Debtor, signed
the petition.

The Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

Judge Barbara J. Houser presides over the Debtor's case.  

Pronske, Goolsby & Kathman, P.C., serves as counsel to the Debtor,
with the engagement, led Gerrit M. Pronske, Esq., and Jason P.
Kathman, Esq.  Bridgepoint Consulting, LLC, is the Debtor's
financial and restructuring advisor.

On Dec. 31, 2016, the Debtor filed a disclosure statement, which
explains its proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.


SIRIUS COMPUTER: Moody's Lowers CFR to B2 Amid Incremental Debt
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded Sirius Computer Solutions,
Inc.'s corporate family rating ("CFR") to B2 from B1. As part of
the rating action, Moody's downgraded Sirius Computer's probability
of default rating to B2-PD from B1-PD, the rating on first lien
senior secured revolving credit facility and the first lien senior
secured term loan to B1 from Ba3, and the rating on the second lien
senior secured term to Caa1 from B3. The rating outlook is stable.
The rating actions follow the company's announcement that it will
acquire Forsythe for total consideration of $350 million, to be
funded largely with debt.

The assigned ratings are subject to review of final documentation
and no material change in the terms and conditions of the
transaction as advised to Moody's.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The downgrade reflects Moody's view that the incremental debt that
Sirius Computer will incur to close the Forsythe acquisition will
maintain the company's adjusted debt/EBITDA leverage above 5.0
times, and further strain the company's financial flexibility.
Following the close of the leveraged buy-out by Kelso & Company in
late 2015, Sirius Computer completed a series of acquisitions
totaling about $81 million, all funded with incremental debt and
cash on hand, which delayed the expected deleveraging.

Although the rating agency views the acquisition of Forsythe as
strategically sound, as it will enhance Sirius Computer's offerings
of high growth security components, execution risks and costs of
integrating Forsythe will further strain the company's credit
metrics over the next couple of years.

The B2 CFR reflects Sirius Computer's smaller scale compared to
competing IT value-added resellers and managed services firms and
the changing nature of IT deployments in the enterprise. The
company also has high vendor concentration, with 36% of the
company's revenues represented by IBM products and services. But,
Moody's recognizes that Sirius Computer is the largest IBM
value-added-reseller of IT solutions primarily serving large
enterprises and medium-sized businesses in the US. The company has
also made progress to diversify its vendor base to include products
from Cisco, EMC, Dell, HP and NetApp which support its continuing
profitability in a business requiring minimal capital investment.
Moody's expects Sirius to generate at least $60 million of free
cash flow in 2018.

Moody's expects Sirius to maintain a good liquidity profile over
the next four quarters, supported by modest cash balances and
anticipated annual free cash flow generation of at least $60
million. The strong free cash flow is buttressed by low capital
expenditures, with annual capital expenditures at less than 2% of
revenues. Working capital needs are expected to be modest and
consistent with seasonality trends.

The ratings for Sirius Computer's debt instruments comprise both
the overall probability of default to which Moody's assigned a PDR
of B2-PD and an average family loss given default assessment. The
B1 (LGD3) rating assigned to the first lien senior secured credit
facilities using Moody's Loss Given Default Methodology, reflects
the facilities' senior position in the capital structure. The
second lien term loan is rated Caa1 (LGD5).

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that Sirius
Computer will maintain its leading market position as a value-added
reseller of IT products and services to the mid-tier market in the
US, and produce consistent levels of operating profits and cash
flows to enable it to delever.

The rating could be upgraded if the company diversifies its
customer base, maintains revenue and cash flow growth and improves
its credit metrics, such as adjusted debt to EBITDA falls below 4.0
times on a sustained basis, and EBITDA to Interest coverage rises
above 4.0 times. The rating could be downgraded if a significant
decline in revenue or cash flows lead to adjusted debt to EBITDA
staying around 6.0 times or with the expectation of weakened
liquidity which could arise from changed payment terms to its
vendors, operating losses, dividend payments, or cash acquisitions
without a proportionate increase in EBITDA.

The following ratings were downgraded:

Corporate Family Rating -- Downgraded to B2 from B1

Probability of Default Rating -- Downgraded to B2-PD from B1-PD

First Lien Senior Secured Credit Facilities -- Downgraded to B1
(LGD3) from Ba3 (LGD3)

Second Lien Senior Secured Term Loan -- Downgraded to Caa1 (LGD5)
from B3 (LGD5)

Outlook is stable

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.


SOCO REAL ESTATE: Selling Austin Property to Secret Buyer for $1.5M
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SOCO Real Estate, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Texas to authorize the sale of real property
located at 808 Avondale Road, Austin, Texas, to an unnamed buyer
for $1,500,000, subject to higher and better offers.

The Debtor owns and maintains the Property.  After the denial of a
preliminary injunction in March of 2017, the Property was scheduled
for foreclosure on April 4, 2017.  With timing critical and in an
effort to preserve the Property and its equity for the company and
its creditors, the Debtor filed its Chapter 11 petition prior to
the foreclosure sale.

The Debtor's Chapter 11 Case is intended to provide it and its
estate a forum for the orderly and efficient reorganization of the
its assets and satisfaction of outstanding obligations, including
working to obtain a sale of Debtor's assets.  The Debtor believes
such process will be in the best interests of its creditors and
estate.

On May 2, 2017, creditor Little City Investments, LLC, filed its
lift stay motion.  On May 23, the Debtor filed an objection.  A
hearing was held on July 12, 2017.  On July 19, the Court issued
its oral ruling on the motion, determining that the stay should be
modified to allow Little City to post the Property for an October
foreclosure and to allow Little City to pursue the bonds in the
prepetition state court lawsuits.  On July 21, 2017, the Court
entered an order granting the lift stay motion.

On Aug. 17, 2017, the Debtor filed a motion for an order dismissing
the Chapter 11 Case, which requested expedited dismissal of the
Chapter 11 Case to assist it in the brokering and marketing of the
Property for sale.  A hearing on the Motion occurred on Aug. 24,
2017.  During the hearing, the Court indicated that it would not
dismiss the case at that time.  The Court did, however, notes that
a sale of the property would be a good result for the case.  It
reiterated that Debtor should bring any firm offer to the Court for
its review and that the Court would consider such offers.

Accordingly, since that time, the Debtor's management, Gerald
McMillan, has been diligently working to obtain replacement
financing to pay off Little City prior to the foreclosure, and
taking steps to sell the property to pay off Little City and
realize sufficient funds to satisfy the remainder of the Debtor's
liabilities, including payment in full to Debtor's prepetition and
postpetition creditors.

To that end, on Sept. 28, 2017, the Debtor obtained a firm offer
and signed contract from a buyer for the purchase of the Avondale
Property for the price of $1,500,000.  The Property is being sold
"as is."  The contract proposes Oct. 15, 2017 as the date of
closing.

The Buyer will also escrow $15,000 in nonrefundable earnest money.


The Debtor did not identify the buyer in the sale motion filed with
the Bankruptcy Court.   The Debtor did say that the buyer is not an
insider or in any way related to the Debtor or its members.

A copy of the redacted sale contract attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/SOCO_Real_70_Sales.pdf

In addition, as of the filing of the Motion, the Debtor expects
multiple additional offers on the property in the next few days for
between $1,500,000 and $1,700,000.  These buyers have sufficient
funding to assure closing and are not insiders of the Debtor.
Little City is currently owed approximately $1,125,000.  Thus, a
sale of the property pursuant to the contract or at such higher
offer that is received will net significant equity for the estate.

The Debtor is filing a request for expedited hearing
contemporaneously with the Motion, which asks that the Motion be
heard on Oct. 13, 2017.

                     About SOCO Real Estate

Based in Austin, Texas, SOCO Real Estate, LLC, sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No.
17-10393) on April 4, 2017.  The petition was signed by Gerald
McMillan, managing member.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
estimated its assets and debt at $1 million to $10 million.  Mark
A. Castillo, Esq., and Bryan C. Assink, Esq., at Curtis | Castillo
PC, serve as counsel to the Debtor.


STEWART DUDLEY: Sale of Panama City Beach Condo Unit for $265K OK'd
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Tamara O. Mitchell of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Alabama authorized Magnify Industries, LLC's
sale of Condo Unit 431 of Emerald Beach Resort located at 14701
Front Beach Road, Panama City Beach, Florida, Tax ID No.
40000-300-029, to V. Edgar Churchill for $265,000.

Magnify is authorized to proceed to the closing of the sale of the
Condo Unit so long as the total settlement charges set forth on
line 1400 of the Settlement Statement (HUD-1) for such closing
("Settlement Charges") 105% of the estimated total settlement
charges set forth (exclusive of the cost of the 4-year home
warranty not shown on the HUD-1, which will not exceed $1,000) and
the closing is conducted within 45 days of the date of the Order.

Should the Settlement Charges or taxes on the HUD-1 for the closing
exceed the limits, or should more than 45 days be needed to close
the sale, Magnify will provide email notice to the Trustee and the
Trustee's counsel along with a copy of the HUD-1.  The Trustee will
have two business days from the delivery of such notice to respond
with either his approval or rejection of the Settlement Charges or
the extension of the closing date, as applicable.

If the Trustee approves the request, Magnify is authorized to
proceed with closing.  If the Trustee rejects the request or fails
to respond within the time allotted, Magnify will file an emergency
motion with the Court seeking approval of the Settlement Charges or
extension of time and obtain an order authorizing closing.

The net sales proceeds, after payment of the above referenced
settlement charges, will be placed in the escrow account of Engel,
Hairston & Johanson P.C., to be held pursuant to the provisions of
the Order Granting the Trustee's Emergency Motion and Memorandum of
Law for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction
entered in Adversary Proceeding No. 17-00052-TOM associated with
this matter.

                    About Stewart Ray Dudley

Stewart Ray Dudley filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ala.
Case No. 16-01842) on May 5, 2016, and is represented by R. Scott
Williams, Esq. from Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.C.

In January 2017, Buffalo Rock Company and James C. Lee, III,
creditors of Stewart Ray Dudley, filed a motion for order directing
the appointment of Peter W. Colmer as Chapter 11 Trustee for the
Debtor's bankruptcy estate.  They claimed that continuously acting
against the best interest of his estate, the Debtor caused numerous
assets to be transferred to Magnify Industries, LLC, including an
automobile collection previously valued at over $5,500,000; 100% of
his interest of an updated warehouse and event space commonly
referred to as Old Car Heaven previously valued at over $1,534,000;
and 17 beach front condominiums.

Buffalo Rock is represented by Burr & Forman LLP.  James C. Lee,
III, is represented by Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP.


THOUGHTWORKS INC: S&P Assigns 'B-' CCR, Outlook Positive
--------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it assigned its 'B-' corporate credit
rating to Chicago-based Thoughtworks Inc. The outlook is positive.

S&P said, "We also assigned our 'B-' issue-level and '3' recovery
ratings to the borrower's $235 million senior secured credit
facilities, consisting of a $35 million revolving credit facility
due 2022 and a $200 million term loan due 2024. The '3' recovery
rating indicates our expectation for meaningful (50%-70%; rounded
estimate 65%) recovery in the event of payment default."

The credit rating is based on preliminary terms and conditions.

"The rating is based on ThoughtWorks' relatively small scale within
the fragmented commercial IT consulting services industry, risk as
the company transitions from a founder-led culture to that of
private equity ownership, and low profitability compared with its
peers," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Geoffrey Wilson.

The positive outlook reflects S&P's expectation for organic revenue
growth in the low teens, resulting from favorable enterprise IT
spending trends.


VANGUARD HEALTHCARE: Cash Collateral Use Extended Until Oct. 31
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Randal S. Mashburn of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Tennessee signed a fifth agreed order further
extending the Stipulated Final Order authorizing Vanguard
Healthcare, LLC and its affiliated debtors to use Healthcare
Financial Solutions, LLC's cash collateral through Oct. 31, 2017.

Currently, the Debtors have authority to use Healthcare Financial
Solutions' cash collateral, under the terms and conditions of the
Stipulated Final Order, which is scheduled to terminate after Sept.
27.

The Court reaffirms all terms and conditions of the Cash Collateral
Order, including the Lenders' Replacement Liens granted to Agents,
on behalf of Lenders, and the Lenders' Super-Priority Claim, to
remain in full force and effect.

The Debtors, Healthcare Financial Solutions and the Committee have
agreed to a further extension of the Cash Collateral Order, subject
these terms and conditions:

     (a) The Debtors' use of Cash Collateral will be in accordance
with the Budget prepared by the Debtors and approved by Agents. The
Budget may include a payment of no more than $200,000 per calendar
month during the period from the entry of the Extension Order until
the occurrence of a Termination Event to be held on behalf of the
Debtors and their estates in a segregated Fee Reserve Account for
the payment of the fees and costs of Committee professionals and
Debtors' bankruptcy and special counsel.

     (b) The Debtors will make a payment in the amount of $560,000
to Agents for the benefit of Lenders.

A full-text copy of the Fifth Agreed Order, dated September 25,
2017, is available at https://is.gd/UQOuAv

Healthcare Financial Solutions is represented by:

           John A. Harris, Esq.
           Robert P. Harris, Esq.
           QUARLES & BRADY LLP
           Renaissance One
           Two North Central Avenue
           Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2391
           Tel: 602-229-5200
           E-mail: john.harris@quarles.com
                  robert.harris@quarles.com

                   -- and --

           Charles W. Cook, III, Esq.
           ADAMS AND REES LLP
           424 Church Street, Suite 2700
           Nashville, Tennessee 37219
           Tel: 615-259-1450
           E-mail: charles.cook@arlaw.com

                   About Vanguard Healthcare

Vanguard Healthcare, LLC, is a long-term care provider
headquartered in Brentwood, Tennessee, providing rehabilitation and
skilled nursing services at 14 facilities in four states (Florida,
Mississippi, Tennessee and West Virginia).

Vanguard Healthcare and 17 of its subsidiaries each filed a Chapter
11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Lead Case No. 16-03296)
on May 6, 2016.  The petitions were signed by William D. Orand, the
CEO.  Vanguard estimated assets in the range of $100 million to
$500 million and liabilities of up to $100 million.  

The cases are assigned to Judge Randal S. Mashburn.

The Debtors hired Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; BMC Group as noticing agent; and Stewart & Barnett, Ltd.,
and Maggart & Associates, P.C., as accountants.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors. Bass, Berry & Sims PLC serves as bankruptcy
counsel to the committee. CohnReznick LLP is the committee's
financial advisor.

The U.S. Trustee also appointed Laura E. Brown as patient care
ombudsman for Vanguard Healthcare.


VANITY SHOP: Given Until November 26 to File Liquidation Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Shon Hastings of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of North Dakota extended the exclusive period for Vanity Shop of
Grand Forks, Inc. to file a plan of liquidation to November 26,
2017, and the exclusive period for the Debtor to solicit
acceptances of that plan to January 25, 2018.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor asked for exclusivity extension, asserting that there are
still certain critical matters that must be resolved, including the
evaluation of TGC, LP's claim, the claims of landlords for
rejection damages and possible preference claims, and concluding a
sale of the IP assets, before the Debtor can further pursue and
gain approval of a plan and accompanying disclosure statement
containing adequate information.

The Debtor said that as of the July 3, 2017, deadline, there were
321 proofs of claim filed; and total claims filed to date is 338.
Now that the claims bar date has passed, the Debtor has filed its
motion to approve procedures regarding the claim objection
procedures.  The Debtor, however, required additional time to
analyze the proofs of claim filed in the case to decide how to best
structure a plan of liquidation.

The Debtor also said that its secured creditor TGC, LP has filed
its proof of claim in excess of $5 million, which is critical for
voting purposes on a plan of liquidation.  The Unsecured Creditors'
Committee has indicated its intention to pursue subordination
and/or a finding that the debt owed by Debtor to TGC, LP is invalid
and unenforceable. Accordingly, the Debtor, and possibly the
Committee, will need additional time to negotiate a resolution of
TGC, LP's claim.  The Debtor asserted that treatment of TGC, LP's
debt will have a significant impact on the treatment of the
unsecured creditors and voting for a liquidation plan.

The Debtor told the Court that it has also been in the process of
reviewing claims made by various taxing entities and providing
information to those entities as to the likelihood of no obligation
for returns or taxes owed during the period for which claims have
been filed.

Moreover, the Debtor contended that it will likely have to object
to various landlord claims as exceeding the Bankruptcy Code's
limitation on rejection damages.  The Debtor claimed that it is
still in the process of analyzing all filed landlord claims as to
appropriately claimed lease rejection damages and mitigation
offsets, if any. The Debtor said that additional time will be
needed to analyze the various landlord proofs of claim since this
will have an impact on a plan of liquidation which has interim
distributions.

In addition, the Debtor has retained Hilco Streambank and DBTS to
market and sell its intellectual property assets.  Once an asset
purchase agreement has been entered into between the Debtor and the
stalking horse bidder for sale of the IP, the Debtor averred that a
motion to approve the competitive auction process and bidding
procedures for the IP will be filed.  The Debtor said that this
sale process will assure that maximum value is obtained for the IP
assets, and that proceeds from sale of the IP will increase the
pool of funds available to creditors and will need to be included
for distribution in any plan for liquidation.

                About Vanity Shop of Grand Forks

Based in Fargo, North Dakota, Vanity Shop of Grand Forks, Inc.
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. N.Dak. Case No. 17-30112) on
March 1, 2017. The petition was signed by James Bennett, chairman
of the Board of Directors.  In its petition, the Debtor estimated
assets of less than $100,000 and liabilities of $10 million to $50
million.

Judge Shon Hastings presides over the case.  Caren Stanley, Esq.,
at Vogel Law Firm, serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  The
Debtor hired Eide Bailly, LLP as auditor; Bell Bank as trustee for
the ERISA Plan; and Jill Motschenbacher as accountant.

On March 10, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors. The committee hired Fox
Rothschild LLP as bankruptcy counsel, BGA Management, LLC, as
financial advisor, and Brady Martz & Associates PC, as accountant.


WALKER RENAISSANCE: Sale of Tampa Properties to RSM for $1.6M OK'd
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Michael G. Williamson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida authorized Walker Renaissance
Manufacturing, Inc.'s sale of real properties (i) located at 8802
E. Broadway Ave., Tampa, Florida and (ii) located 8740 E. Broadway,
Tampa, Florida to RSM Resources, Inc., for $1,550,000.

The Debtor must provide Synovus Bank a final version of the
settlement statement or closing statement prior to closing, which
must be approved by Synovus Bank in writing prior to closing.
Synovus Bank will not unreasonably withhold its approval of the
final closing statement.

The normal costs of closing and all amounts owed to Synovus Bank,
other than any disputed attorneys' fees and costs, will be paid at
closing.

If there are any disputes regarding attorneys' fees and costs
claimed by Synovus Bank, the full amount of the claimed attorneys'
fees and costs will be held in trust by David W. Steen, P.A. in a
dual signature DIP account, pending consensual resolution between
Synovus Bank and the Debtor.

If the Debtor and Synovus cannot come to an agreement and the
Debtor continues to dispute Synovus Bank's claimed attorneys' fees
and costs, then Synovus Bank or the Debtor may seek determination
of an award of attorneys' fees and costs by the Court.  If the
Debtor does not dispute the attorneys' fees and costs for Synovus
Bank, such fees can be paid at closing.  If the Debtor and Synovus
Bank come to an agreement regarding the attorneys' fees and costs
after closing, but before bringing the issue to the Court, Synovus
Bank's attorneys' fees and costs may be paid from the funds
withheld from the excess funds.

Any additional funds, not disbursed at closing, will be deposited
in a dual signature DIP account with signatory authority by both
David W. Steen, Esq., and the Debtor.  Such amounts will not be
disbursed without an Order of the Court.

All closing documents should be filed with the Court within seven
days of closing, or with the next monthly operating report,
whichever is earlier.

            About Walker Renaissance Manufacturing

Walker Renaissance Manufacturing Inc. is a packaging company in
Hillsborough County, Florida, that owns a real property located at
8802 E. Broadway Ave., Tampa, Florida 33619 valued at $839,348.

Walker Renaissance filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-05390) on June 21, 2017.  Robert M. Walker,
president and CEO, signed the petition.  The Debtor disclosed
$1.58
million in assets and $1.52 million in liabilities at the time of
the filing.

The Debtor is represented by David W. Steen, Esq. at David W
Steen,
P.A.


WEIGHT WATCHERS: S&P Raises CCR to 'B' on Performance Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its corporate credit rating on New
York-based Weight Watchers International Inc. to 'B' from 'B-'. The
outlook is stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we raised our issue-level rating on
the company's first-lien credit facilities, consisting of a $50
million revolving facility expiring in 2018 and a $2.1 billion term
loan due in 2020, to 'B' from 'B-'. In addition, we revised our
recovery rating on these debt facilities to '3' from '4'. The '3'
recovery rating indicates our expectation for lenders to receive
meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 55%) recovery in the event
of a payment default."

The company's funded debt as of July 1, 2017, is about 1.9 billion.


S&P said,"Our ratings upgrade reflects our belief that the
company's improved operating performance has resulted in higher
revenue and EBITDA growth ahead of our expectations and stronger
credit measures. We now expect leverage to improve toward the
low-6x area by the end of 2017, from about 7.3x at the end of 2016,
and we expect Weight Watchers will generate about $100 million in
free operating cash flows this year.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the company will
sustain its recent operational improvements as it benefits from new
membership growth and higher retention rates that will continue
into the 2018 winter recruiting season. Furthermore, we expect the
company's financial policy with respect to debt-financed dividends
or acquisitions to be in line with our current expectations that
leverage remains below 7x.

"We could also lower our ratings if the company's operational
performance deteriorates because of a tougher competitive
environment or an unsuccessful 2018 winter recruiting season,
resulting in leverage exceeding 7.5x and significantly weakening
the company's cash flow generation. We estimate this could occur if
EBITDA declines about 20% from current levels, while debt remains
constant.

"In addition, we could lower the ratings if the company's financial
policies become more aggressive and it issues debt to fund
shareholder returns. We estimate that about $500 million of
incremental debt at current EBITDA levels would likely result in
leverage exceeding this threshold.  

"Although unlikely over the next year, we could raise our ratings
if the company's operating performance exceeds our expectation,
debt to EBITDA improves below 5x, and its private equity sponsor
formally commits to sustaining this leverage or to reduce
collective ownership to below 40% and relinquish control of the
company."


WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC: SCEGC No Longer Committee Member
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 on Oct. 2 announced that South
Carolina Electric and Gas Company is no longer a member of the
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases
of Westinghouse Electric Company LLC and its affiliates.

The remaining committee members are Fluor Enterprises Inc., SSM
Industries Inc., Dastech International Inc., Georgia Power Company,
Jones Lang LaSalle Americas Inc., and Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.

                  About Westinghouse Electric

Westinghouse Electric Company LLC --
http://www.westinghousenuclear.com/-- is a U.S. based nuclear
power company founded in 1999 that provides design work and
start-up help for new nuclear power plants and makes many of the
components.  Westinghouse manufactures and supplies the commercial
fuel products needed to run the plants, and it offers training,
engineering, maintenance, and quality management services.  Almost
50% of nuclear power plants around the world and about 60% of U.S.
plants are based on Westinghouse's technology.  Westinghouse's
world headquarters are located in the Pittsburgh suburb of
Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania.

On Oct. 16, 2006, Westinghouse Electric was sold for $5.4 billion
to a group comprising of Toshiba (77% share), partners The Shaw
Group (20% share), and Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co.
Ltd. (3% share).  After purchasing part of Shaw's stake in 2013,
Japan-based conglomerate Toshiba obtained ownership of 87% of
Westinghouse.

Amid cost overruns at U.S. nuclear reactors it was building,
Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, along with 29 affiliates, filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-10751) on March 29,
2017.  The petitions were signed by AlixPartners' Lisa J. Donahue,
chief transition and development officer.

The Debtors disclosed total assets of $4.32 billion and total
liabilities of $9.39 billion as of Feb. 28, 2017.

The Hon. Michael E. Wiles presides over the cases.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP serves as counsel to the Debtors.  The
Debtors hired AlixPartners LLP as financial advisor; PJT Partners
Inc. as investment banker; Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as
claims and noticing agent; K&L Gates as special counsel; and KPMG
LLP as tax consultant and accounting and financial reporting
advisor.

Toshiba Nuclear Energy Holdings (UK) Ltd. is represented by Albert
Togut, Esq., Brian F. Moore, Esq., and Kyle J. Ortiz, Esq., at
Togut, Segal & Segal LLP.

On April 7, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Proskauer Rose LLP is
the committee's bankruptcy counsel, and Houlihan Lokey Capital,
Inc., serves as investment banker.

The Board of Directors of Westinghouse appointed a special panel
called the U.S. AP1000 Committee to oversee the company's
activities related to certain AP1000 nuclear plants located in
Georgia and South Carolina.


WESTMORELAND COAL: Will Collect $12 Million in Net Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------------
Westmoreland Coal Company said it terminated its power purchase
contracts with BP Energy Company and assigned its substitute energy
agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company, a subsidiary of
Dominion Energy, effective Oct. 1, 2017.  As a result, Westmoreland
will no longer have any obligation to provide power and capacity to
Dominion, or to purchase power from BP which, in turn, secured the
release of the related cash collateral.  Westmoreland will receive
$12 million, comprised of $22 million of cash collateral less a
final $10 million make-whole payment to BP.  Previously,
Westmoreland expected to receive a similar amount in net cash
collateral releases as the contracts ran off through early 2019.

"I want to congratulate the team on their hard work unwinding the
overhang from this non-core power asset.  We recently announced the
sale of the physical ROVA facility, which is expected to close
later this month and will generate $5 million of cash receipts.
This $5 million, plus the accelerated receipt of $12 million from
exiting the power agreements, will result in significant cash
inflows this year as well as the elimination of the otherwise
ongoing annual cash flow drag of approximately $5 million from the
ROVA operation," said Kevin Paprzycki, Westmoreland's chief
executive officer.

                 About Westmoreland Coal Company

Westmoreland Coal Company -- http://www.westmoreland.com/-- is the
oldest independent coal company in the United States.
Westmoreland's coal operations include surface coal mines in the
United States and Canada, underground coal mines in Ohio and New
Mexico, a char production facility, and a 50% interest in an
activated carbon plant.  Westmoreland also owns the general partner
of and a majority interest in Westmoreland Resource Partners, LP, a
publicly-traded coal master limited partnership (NYSE:WMLP).

Westmoreland Coal reported a net loss of $28.87 million on $1.47
billion of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a
net loss of $219.09 million on $1.41 billion of revenues for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of June 30, 2017, Westmoreland Coal
had $1.45 billion in total assets, $2.22 billion in total
liabilities and a total deficit of $766.51 million.

                          *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on March 2, 2016, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded the ratings of Westmoreland, including its corporate
family rating to 'Caa1' from 'B3', probability of default rating
(PDR) to 'Caa1-PD' from 'B3-PD', and the ratings on the senior
secured credit facility and senior secured notes to 'Caa3' from
'Caa1'.  The Speculative Grade Liquidity rating of SGL-3 remains
unchanged.  The outlook is stable.

In April 2017, S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit
rating on Westmoreland to 'CCC+' from 'B'.  S&P views
Westmoreland's capital structure to be unsustainable in the long
term without a significant boost in coal prices and volumes over
the next year.


WILLIAMS FINANCIAL: Oct. 10 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, Acting United States Trustee for Region 6, will hold an
organizational meeting on Oct. 10, 2017, at 1:00 p.m. in the
bankruptcy case of Williams Financial Group, Inc., et al.

The meeting will be held at:

               Office of the U. S. Trustee
               Earl Cabell Federal Building
               1100 Commerce Street, Room 524
               Dallas, Texas 75242

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section1102
of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it
represents.

             About Williams Financial Group Inc.

Williams Financial Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries WFG Management
Services Inc., WFG Investments Inc. and WFG Advisors LP sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.
Texas Case Nos. 17-33578 to 17-33581) on September 24, 2017.

At the time of the filing, Williams Financial Group disclosed that
it had estimated assets and liabilities of $1,000,001 to $10
million.

Judge Harlin Dewayne Hale presides over the cases.


WINDSTREAM HOLDINGS: S&P Affirms 'B' CCR, Outlook Negative
----------------------------------------------------------
U.S. telecommunications provider Windstream Holdings Inc. recently
disclosed that it received a purported notice of default from a
noteholder claiming the company violated covenants under the
indenture governing its 6.375% senior notes due 2023.

S&P Global Ratings is affirming its 'B' corporate credit rating on
Little Rock, Ark.-based Windstream Holdings Inc. The outlook is
negative.

S&P said, "We also affirmed the 'BB-' issue-level ratings on
Windstream Services LLC's and Windstream Holding of the Midwest
Inc.'s senior secured and senior unsecured debt. The recovery
rating remains '1', which indicates our expectation of very high
(90%-100%; rounded estimate: 95%) recovery in the event of payment
default.

"At the same time, we affirmed our 'B' issue-level rating on
Windstream Services' senior unsecured debt. The recovery rating
remains '4', which indicates our expectation of average (30%-50%;
rounded estimate: 30%) recovery in the event of payment default."

The ratings affirmation follows the disclosure that Windstream
recently received a purported notice of default from a noteholder
claiming that the transfer of certain assets and subsequent lease
transaction in connection with the company's spin-off of
Communications Sales & Leasing Inc. (now known as Uniti Group Inc.)
in April 2015 violated covenants under the company's indenture
governing its 6.375% senior notes due 2023.

The negative outlook reflects continued uncertainty around future
performance stemming from competitive pressures in the consumer and
small to midsize business segment, slower sales conversion in the
enterprise business, and low visibility into the impact of
cost-cutting initiatives. Moreover, avenues to address the
company's debt maturities in 2020 and 2021 could be constrained,
absent a material improvement in operating performance.

S&P said, "We could lower the rating if continued customer losses
or weak sales growth result in further degradation in operating
performance with free operating cash flow (FOCF) trending
materially lower. We believe these factors could lead to a
diminished liquidity position and impair Windstream's ability to
pay down these medium-term debt maturities. We could also lower the
rating if the company makes integration missteps from its recent
acquisitions of EarthLink and Broadview, resulting in higher churn,
pricing pressure, and lower-than-expected synergies.

"We could revise the outlook to stable if Windstream is able to
demonstrate sustained operating improvement in both its consumer
and enterprise businesses and is able to successfully reduce costs
from operating synergies and targeted expense reductions, resulting
in improved FOCF generation. We believe these factors could result
in greater investor confidence in the company's ability to address
debt maturities in 2020 and beyond."


XS RANCH FUND: Seeks Dec. 15 Plan Filing Exclusivity Extension
--------------------------------------------------------------
XS Ranch Fund VI, L.P. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of California to extend the exclusive period to
file a plan of reorganization through December 15, 2017, and
thereafter the period within the Debtor has the exclusive right to
solicit acceptances to any plan so filed through March 15, 2018.

Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtor's exclusive period to
file a Chapter 11 plan was slated to expire September 29, 2017,
absent an extension, and its exclusive period to solicit
acceptances to a plan ends November 28, 2017.

This is the Debtor's first request to extend the plan exclusivity
period.

The Debtor tells the Court that notwithstanding the complexity of
the case and the fact that the Debtor elected to convert the case
to a Chapter 11 less than four months ago, it has made significant
progress towards a reorganization that is expected to pay unsecured
creditors in full.

The Debtor relates that since the conversion to Chapter 11, the
Debtor has spent significant time obtaining the following
successful results in this case:

     (a) defeating a motion for the appointment of a Chapter 11
         Trustee, which would have significantly impaired value
         and recovery to creditors in this case;

     (b) obtaining court approval for the appointment of an
         exceptionally qualified Chief Restructuring Officer;

     (c) negotiating an extension of time to enable the Debtor
         to exercise options to repurchase 2,430 acres of
         valuable property critical to its reorganization;

     (d) securing, negotiating and closing $18.6 million of DIP
         Financing with Crestline which allowed the Debtor to:
         (i) pay off almost $8.8 million of senior secured debt;
         (ii) provided the Debtor with funds sufficient to
         execute and consummate the repurchase options on 2,430
         acres of valuable property, critical to the Debtor's
         reorganization; and (iii) pay recurring operating
         expenses going forward; and

     (e) paving the way toward securing exit financing for a
         successful reorganization of the Debtor's affairs.

The Debtor has spent significant time in this case negotiating and
securing debtor-in-possession financing from Crestline, a source
expected to provide exit financing to the Debtor to pave the way to
a successful reorganization. Crestline has spent months conducting
(and who continues to conduct) due diligence on an investment in
the Debtor, and is currently negotiating the economic and other
terms of a transaction to provide exit financing for the Debtor's
emergence from chapter 11.

Meanwhile, the Debtor continues to discuss with both outside
investors as well as several of the inside investors, the remaining
limited partners, on potential exit financing packages so as to
ensure this case continues to move in a positive direction toward a
successful reorganization.

Based on the negotiations with Crestline, as well as ongoing
interest from multiple internal and external parties, coupled with
the resources available to and the time spent by these parties, the
Debtor drafted its Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization and a
disclosure statement in support thereof.  The Debtor has already
filed a Chapter 11 plan -- which provides for payment in full of
all general unsecured creditors' claims -- prior to the current
plan exclusivity deadline of September 29, 2017. The Debtor
believes that the Plan can and will be confirmed in or before March
2018.

The Debtor intends to try to resolve its disputes with the
rescission claimants over subordination of their claims, which must
be completed before any plan can go effective in this case. In
addition, the Debtor intends to work with its other creditor
constituencies in the case toward obtaining a consensual plan of
reorganization. The Debtor has faced adversity with all relief
requested thus far, yet through the Debtor’s efforts, have been
able to consensually resolve all issues.

While the Debtor filed a Chapter 11 plan before the September 29,
2017 exclusivity deadline, the Debtor expects that outstanding
issues may need to be resolved through amendments to the plan, and
that, in any event, confirmation of the plan will not occur until
after the solicitation exclusivity period has expired.
Accordingly, the Debtor asserts that the Court should extend the
exclusivity periods in order to ensure that third parties are not
able to derail the confirmation process as well as the Debtor's
efforts to emerge from Chapter 11 through the filing and
solicitation of a competing plan.

The Debtor seeks to extend the plan exclusivity to avoid the undue
delay and expense that would result in the event of competing plans
being filed in this case.  Accordingly, the extension of the
exclusivity periods would not prejudice and would actually benefit
the rights of parties-in-interest, and should therefore be
granted.

                About XS Ranch Fund VI, L.P.

Dr. Hasso Plattner, David Winton, Granite Land Company, and Peter
Mainstain filed an involuntary petition (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No.
16-31367) against XS Ranch Fund VI, L.P for relief under Chapter 7
of the Bankruptcy Code on December 23, 2016.  On May 31, 2017, the
Debtor consented to conversion of the Bankruptcy Case to one under
Chapter 11.  On June 1, 2017, the Court entered its order
converting the Bankruptcy Case to Chapter 11.

The petitioning creditors were represented by Patricia H. Lyon,
Esq., at French and Lyon; Terry J. Mollica, Esq., at Chiarelli &
Mollica, LLP; Mary Ellmann Tang, Esq., at French Lyon Tang; and
David C. Winton, Esq., at the Law Offices of David C. Winton.

The Debtor is represented by Pamela Egan, Esq., at Rimon P.C.; and
Richard H. Golubow, Esq., Garrick A. Hollander, Esq., and Andrew
Levin, Esq., at Winthrop Couchot.

On July 28, 2017, the United States Trustee for Region 17 appointed
an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  The Committee
members are Hoover Associates, Vogel and Associates, and Hardee
Partners LLC.  The Committee hired Sheppard Mullin Richter &
Hampton LLP, as counsel.


ZETTA JET: Chapter 11 Trustee to Oversee Restructuring
------------------------------------------------------
Zetta Jet Pts. Ltd., a global leader in private international,
business and luxury air travel, on Sept. 29, 2017, disclosed that
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California
approved the U.S. Trustee's and its joint request to appoint a
Chapter 11 trustee.  The Company took this action to ensure a
unified direction in the Company's restructuring efforts amidst
continued shareholder disputes.  The U.S. Trustee's Office is
expected to appoint the Chapter 11 trustee shortly.

"We believe that having an independent and impartial trustee in
place to oversee the business as well as the company's Chapter 11
restructuring protects the interests of all of our stakeholders,
and is the best course to ensure the smooth operation of our
business throughout the proceedings," said Zetta Jet President and
CEO Michael Maher.

The Company also announced that to facilitate normal business
operations, it has received Court permission to pay a select group
of critical vendors in the ordinary course of business for
pre-petition debts owed.

"The Court's approval of our critical vendor motion is another
positive step in our efforts to restructure our debt while
continuing to provide safe, reliable and luxurious service to our
customers.  We also appreciate the ongoing partnership of our
customers and suppliers, and thank our employees for their
continued dedication," Maher concluded.

The Company also said a recent emergency injunction ordered by a
Singapore Court to stop the Chapter 11 proceedings was null and
void given that a Singapore Court has no jurisdiction in U.S.
federal bankruptcy court.

                          About Zetta Jet

Headquartered in Singapore, Zetta Jet claims to be the world's
first truly personalized private airline.  Zetta Jet promises to
deliver the ultimate in bespoke luxury experiences to a discerning
clientele with its unique experience that combines the dedicated
Asian service philosophy with the flexibility and 'can-do' spirit
of the U.S., adorned with the glamour of Europe's enduring chic on
its Bombardier fleet with ultra-long range intercontinental
capabilities across the Pacific Rim.

Zetta Jet is a FAA-certificated air carrier and the first only part
135 operator authorized to conduct Polar flights, enabling Zetta
Jet to optimize routes without limitation.  The Company has offices
both in Los Angeles and Singapore, and a network of sales and
support offices in New York, London, San Jose, Harbin and
Singapore.

Burbank, California-based Zetta Jet USA, Inc., and its
Singapore-based parent, Zetta Jet Pte. Ltd, filed voluntary
bankruptcy petitions under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
in  Los Angeles (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-21386 and 17-21387)
on Sept. 15, 2017.

Zetta Jet PTE and Zetta Jet USA each estimated assets and debt of
$50 million to $100 million.

Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill L.L.P, serves as counsel to the
Debtors.


[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings
-------------------------------------------------------
In re Nicholas M. Bozickovich
   Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No. 17-15469
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 15, 2017
         represented by: Glenn E. Forbes, Esq.
                         FORBES LAW LLC
                         E-mail: bankruptcy@geflaw.net

In re Hawkers Realty, LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Miss. Case No. 17-13529
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 21, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/msnb17-13529.pdf
         represented by: R. Michael Bolen, Esq.
                         HOOD & BOLEN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW
                         E-mail: rmb@hoodbolen.com

In re Moultonboro Hospitality LLC
   Bankr. D.N.H. Case No. 17-11326
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 21, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nhb17-11326.pdf
         represented by: Peter N. Tamposi, Esq.
                         THE TAMPOSI LAW GROUP
                         E-mail: peter@thetamposilawgroup.com

In re Zafar Salyamov
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-44878
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 21, 2017
         represented by: Alla Kachan, Esq.
                         E-mail: alla@kachanlaw.com

In re Shillington Social Quarters
   Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 17-16456
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 21, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb17-16456.pdf
         represented by: John A. Digiamberardino, Esq.
                         CASE & DIGIAMBERARDINO, P.C.
                         E-mail: jad@cdllawoffice.com

In re Remond Remodeling, Inc.
   Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 17-03903
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 21, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb17-03903.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Dakeda, LLC
   Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 17-43534
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 21, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/wawb17-43534.pdf
         represented by: David C. Smith, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF DAVID SMITH, PLLC
                         E-mail: ecf@davidsmithlaw.com

In re Miguel Antonio Rueda
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-21691
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 22, 2017
         represented by: Giovanni Orantes, Esq.
                         ORANTES LAW FIRM PC
                         E-mail: go@gobklaw.com

In re Noles Partners, LLC
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-08142
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb17-08142.pdf
         represented by: Buddy D Ford, Esq.
                         BUDDY D. FORD, P.A.
                         E-mail: Buddy@TampaEsq.com

In re Commercial Real Estate Holdings of SF LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-21593
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb17-21593.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re U S Way, Inc.
   Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case No. 17-07277
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/insb17-07277.pdf
         represented by: David R. Krebs, Esq.
                         HESTER BAKER KREBS LLC
                         E-mail: dkrebs@hbkfirm.com

In re Jonathan S. Hynd
   Bankr. D. Maine Case No. 17-10543
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 22, 2017
         represented by: Andrew R. Sarapas, Esq.
                         STROUT & PAYSON, P.A.
                         E-mail: sarapas@stroutpayson.com

In re Mike Farrell's Detroit Wrecker Sales, LLC
   Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 17-53308
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb17-53308.pdf
         represented by: Jeffery Jon Sattler, Esq.
                         SCHAFER AND WEINER, PLLC
                         E-mail: jsattler@schaferandweiner.com

In re Susan Inez Rose
   Bankr. W.D. Mo. Case No. 17-42587
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 22, 2017
         represented by: Ronald S. Weiss, Esq.
                         BERMAN DELEVE KUCHAN & CHAPMAN
                         E-mail: rweiss@bdkc.com

In re Isha Kaushik
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-12636
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 22, 2017
         Filed Pro Se

In re Herbert Reece McRae and Ermalynn Durant McRae
   Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 17-04652
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 22, 2017
         represented by: Richard Preston Cook, Esq.
                         RICHARD P. COOK, PLLC
                         E-mail: capefeardebtrelief@gmail.com

In re Blue Moon Hotel & Swim Club, Inc.
   Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 17-16485
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb17-16485.pdf
         represented by: Jonathan H. Stanwood, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF JONATHAN H. STANWOOD, LLC
                         E-mail: jhs@stanwoodlaw.com

In re Raylyns Goodies to Go
   Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 17-03925
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb17-03925.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Cyrilla Landscaping & Supply Co. Inc.
   Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 17-23819
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/pawb17-23819.pdf
         represented by: Donald R. Calaiaro, Esq.
                         CALAIARO VALENCIK
                         E-mail: dcalaiaro@c-vlaw.com

In re Susan G. Roach
   Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 17-70705
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 22, 2017
         represented by: Kevin J. Petak, Esq.
                         SPENCE CUSTER SAYLOR WOLFE & ROSE, LLC
                         E-mail: kpetak@spencecuster.com

In re R. Carrier Trucking, Inc.
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-08163
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 23, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb17-08163.pdf
         represented by: Suzy Tate, Esq.
                         SUZY TATE, P.A.
                         E-mail: suzy@suzytate.com

In re Lawrence L Rolfs and Kathryn M Rolfs
   Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 17-335510
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 23, 2017
         represented by: Donald L. Wyatt, Esq.
                         WYATT & MIRABELLA PC
                         E-mail: don.wyatt@wyattpc.com

In re Infill One Of Unit II, LLC
   Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 17-11242
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 25, 2017
         Filed Pro Se

In re Henry Garcia
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-12567
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 25, 2017
         represented by: Onyinye N. Anyama, Esq.
                         ANYAMA LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: onyi@anyamalaw.com

In re Michael Andrew Sheldon and Kathleen Sheldon
   Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 17-18876
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 25, 2017
         represented by: Jeffrey Weinman, Esq.
                         E-mail: jweinman@epitrustee.com

In re Wit's End Ranch Retreat, LLC
   Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 17-18893
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 25, 2017
         represented by: Vincent Franco, Esq.

In re Robert W. Lundeen and Carolyn M. Lundeen
   Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 17-28584
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 25, 2017
         represented by: Richard L. Hirsh, Esq.
                         RICHARD L HIRSH, PC
                         E-mail: richala@sbcglobal.net

In re Durso Equity Group, LLC
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 17-29370
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 25, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb17-29370.pdf
         represented by: Andrew I. Radmin, Esq.
                         CARKHUFF & RADMIN
                         E-mail: andyradz@aol.com

In re Alfred E. Selmer and Jacqueline F. Selmer
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-75861
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 25, 2017
         represented by: Sarah M Keenan, Esq.
                         SFERRAZZA & KEENAN
                         E-mail: skeenan@sferrazzakeenan.com

In re Daniel Benyamin and Lucy Benyamin
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-12677
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 25, 2017
         represented by: Randy M. Kornfeld, Esq.
                         KORNFELD & ASSOCIATES, P.C
                         E-mail: rkornfeld@kornfeldassociates.com

In re GSPCO Contracting Inc.
   Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-11999
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 25, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nywb17-11999.pdf
         represented by: Matthew Allen Lazroe, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF MATTHEW A. LAZROE
                         E-mail: lazroebankruptcy@gmail.com

In re Merlinda S. Bojorquez
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 17-30960
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 26, 2017
         Filed Pro Se

In re Albert C. Jackson, Jr.
   Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 17-66757
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 26, 2017
         represented by: Beth E. Rogers, Esq.
                         ROGERS LAW OFFICES
                         E-mail: brogers@berlawoffice.com

In re 9346 Investments, LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case No. 17-07339
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 26, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/insb17-07339.pdf
         represented by: KC Cohen, Esq.
                         KC COHEN, LAWYER, PC
                         E-mail: kc@esoft-legal.com

In re Bobbie Lucille Price
   Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 17-15144
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 26, 2017
         Filed Pro Se

In re James J. Burdge Trust
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-75898
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 26, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb17-75898.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Shree Swaminarayan Satsang Mandal
   Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 17-42100
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 26, 2017
         represented by: Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq.
                         E-mail: joyce@joycelindauer.com

In re Ryan James Roggasch
   Bankr. E.D. Ark. Case No. 17-15276
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 27, 2017
         represented by: Lyndsey D. Dilks, Esq.
                         DILKS LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: ldilks@dilkslawfirm.com

In re Placita Octubre LLC
   Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 17-11410
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 27, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb17-11410.pdf
         represented by: Kasey C. Nye, Esq.
                         KASEY C. NYE, LAWYER, PLLC
                         E-mail: knye@kcnyelaw.com

In re Rafael Ramon Sanchez
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-21803
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 27, 2017
         represented by: Dana M. Douglas, Esq.
                         E-mail: dmddouglas@hotmail.com

In re Roosevelt Brown LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 17-42450
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 27, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb17-42450.pdf
         represented by: Marc Voisenat, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF MARC VOISENAT
                         E-mail: voisenatecf@gmail.com

In re Feiden Gang, LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-21796
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 27, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb17-21796.pdf
         represented by: Jose P Funcia, Esq.
                         MILLER & FUNCIA, P.A.
                         E-mail: millerfunciaecf2@gmail.com

In re Matthew T. Huynh
   Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 17-04720
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 27, 2017
         represented by: Danny Bradford, Esq.
                         BRADFORD LAW OFFICES
                         E-mail: dbradford@bradford-law.com

In re VAB 606 Main St., LLC
   Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 17-04009
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 27, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb17-04009.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re 243 S Main St, LLC
   Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 17-04011
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 27, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb17-04011.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Joe Pat Roberts
   Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 17-28528
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 27, 2017
         represented by: Toni Campbell Parker, Esq.
                         E-mail: tparker002@att.net

In re Charles R. Martin and Linda Martin
   Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 17-70159
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 27, 2017
         represented by: David R. Langston, Esq.
                         MULLIN HOARD & BROWN, LLP
                         E-mail: drl@mhba.com

In re Scottsdale Detox Center Of Arizona, LLC
   Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 17-11494
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 28, 2017
         Filed Pro Se

In re ATP Security Inc.
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-21914
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 28, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-21914.pdf
         represented by: Matthew D Resnik, Esq.
                         SIMON RESNIK HAYES LLP
                         E-mail: matt@srhlawfirm.com

In re Edward James Greene and Tera N. Greene
   Bankr. D. Idaho Case No. 17-01292
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 28, 2017
         represented by: D Blair Clark, Esq.
                         E-mail: dbc@dbclarklaw.com

In re Quebec Court Trust
   Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 17-22992
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 28, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb17-22992.pdf
         represented by: Robert John Harris, Esq.
                         ROBERT J. HARRIS, P.L.C.
                         E-mail: rjharris101@msn.com

In re William J. Holcomb
   Bankr. D.N.M. Case No. 17-12473
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 28, 2017
         represented by: Daniel Andrew White, Esq.
                         ASKEW & MAZEL, LLC
                         E-mail: dwhite@askewmazelfirm.com

In re Joseph Luiso
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-23498
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 28, 2017
         represented by: Norma E. Ortiz, Esq.
                         ORTIZ & ORTIZ, LLP
                         E-mail: email@ortizandortiz.com

In re James Edward Garrett and Sandra Ann Garrett
   Bankr. D.S.D. Case No. 17-30033
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 28, 2017
         represented by: Stan H. Anker, Esq.
                         ANKER LAW GROUP, P.C.
                         E-mail: sanker@rushmore.com

In re Levi Edward Garrett
   Bankr. D.S.D. Case No. 17-30034
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 28, 2017
         represented by: Stan H. Anker, Esq.
                         Anker Law Group, P.C.
                         E-mail: sanker@rushmore.com

In re Duane A. Dahl and Cindy M. Dahl
   Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 17-14253
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 28, 2017
         represented by: Thomas D Neeleman, Esq.
                         E-mail: courtmail@expresslaw.com

In re Herman M. & Amanda K Warner, LLC
   Bankr. S.D.W.V. Case No. 17-30439
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 28, 2017
         Filed Pro Se

In re The Cheer Spot, Inc.
   Bankr. C.D. Ill. Case No. 17-81404
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 29, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilcb17-81404.pdf
         represented by: Sumner Bourne, Esq.
                         RAFOOL, BOURNE & SHELBY, P.C.
                         E-mail: sbnotice@mtco.com

In re Shomara, Inc.
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-12747
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 29, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb17-12747.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re VJT Construction Corp.
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-23516
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 29, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb17-23516.pdf
         represented by: Anne J. Penachio, Esq.
                         PENACHIO MALARA LLP
                         E-mail: apenachio@pmlawllp.com

In re Miranda Harris, LLC
   Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 17-04856
      Chapter 11 Petition filed September 29, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/scb17-04856.pdf
         represented by: Reid B. Smith, Esq.
                         BIRD AND SMITH, PA
                         E-mail: rsmith@birdsmithlaw.com


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2017.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.

                   *** End of Transmission ***