/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/180530.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Wednesday, May 30, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 149

                            Headlines

8 LAWRENCE ROAD: Taps Richard Shackil as Special Counsel
ABE'S BOAT: Hires Lott Firm PLLC as Counsel
AFTERMASTER INC: Operating Costs Raise Going Concern Doubt
ALEGION INC: Court Grants Request Not to Appoint Committee
ALLIED IV LLC: Seeks Exclusivity Extension, Authority to Use Cash

AMBOY GROUP: Seeks to Hire Integrated Property Group as Brokers
AMBOY GROUP: Seeks to Hire M. Davis Group as Appraiser
AMERICAN UNDERWRITING: Taps Small Herrin LLP as Attorney
ARECONT VISION: Judge OKs $4-Mil DIP Loans, Cash Collateral Use
ARECONT VISION: Taps Armory Strategic Partners as Financial Advisor

ARECONT VISION: Taps Imperial Capital, LLC as Investment Banker
ARECONT VISION: Taps Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones as Counsel
B N EMPIRE: Taps Doyle & McGrath Real Estate as Brokers
BIG BEAR BOWLING: Taps Russell C. Barnes as Broker
BIRDHOUSE LLC: Hires Miller & Miller as Attorney

CAMBER ENERGY: CEO Azar Resigns Over 'Conflicts of Interest'
CANBIOLA INC: Insufficient Capital Raise Going Concern Doubt
CANDLE CONNECTION: Hires Steinberg Law Firm PS as Attorney
CARTER FINANCIAL: Hires Aaronson Schantz Beiley, PA as Attorney
CARTER FINANCIAL: Seeks Approval for Interim Use of Cash Collateral

CARTER FINANCIAL: Taps Gidney & Company, PA, CPAs as Accountant
CHOICE RADIO: Chapter 727 Claims Bar Date Set for Sept. 13
CLINTON NURSERIES: Seeks July 2 Plan Exclusivity Period Extension
COLORADO NATIONAL: Sale of Equity Interests to Fund Plan Payments
COMMUNITY HEALTH: Extends Notes Early Tender Deadline to June 1

CONFIE SEGUROS: S&P Lowers ICR to 'CCC+', On Watch Developing
CONTRERAS TRUCKING: Wants Interim Access to Cash Collateral
DENNIS JOHNSON II: Summary Judgment Bid on Receivership Nixed
DPW HOLDINGS: Partners with Restauranteurs to Acquire I.AM
EBH TOPCO: June 6 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel

ECLIPSE BERRY: Hires Lefoldt & Co., P.A. as Accountant
ECOFLORA INC: Chapter 727 Claims Bar Date Set for Aug. 28
ERIN ENERGY: Hires Okin Adams LLP as Counsel
ERIN ENERGY: Hires Stout Risius Ross LLC as Financial Advisor
ETERON INC: Taps Michigan Business Advisors as Business Appraiser

FAMILY PHARMACY: Taps Integrity Pharmacy Consultants as Broker
FLABEG SOLAR US: Bankruptcy Court Junks Suit vs D. Busby, AIDL
FLINT GROUP: $31MM Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off
FLINT GROUP: $794MM Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off
GREEN DOOR: Seeks Court Approval to Use Cash Collateral

HARVEST VISION: Foreclosure Auction Set for July 31
HEATH OIL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
HI-LO FARMS: Taps Coldwell Banker Alfonso Realty as Estate Broker
HOTEL INVESTORS: Auction of Springhill Lot Moved to June 5
ILLINI KIDS: Wants to Use Cash Collateral through July 31

INLAND CONTAINER: Chapter 727 Claims Bar Date Set for Sept. 13
INPIXON: Signs Standstill Agreement with Lender
INT'L MANUFACTURING: Suit vs Battle Creek Dismissed with Prejudice
IO AT TECH: Lawsuit vs Hartford Remanded to State Court
JONES ENERGY: Dismisses PricewaterhouseCoopers as Auditors

JWCCC LLC: Hires Vida Law Firm PLLC as Attorney
K&S UTILITY: Taps Sheils Winnubst PC as Counsel
LC STAR INVESTMENT: Foreclosure Auction Set for June 21
LG WOOD VALLEY: Property Sale Proceeds to Pay Secured Creditors
LINCOLN ENTERPRISE: Seeks 60-Day Exclusive Filing Period Extension

LOVE GRACE: 5th Amended Plan Outline OK'd; June 25 Plan Hearing
MEJD PARTNERSHIP: Hires Mark E. Goodfriend as Bankruptcy Counsel
MIRAGE DENTAL: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
NIGHTHAWK ROYALTIES: Seeks Interim Approval to Use Cash Collateral
NINE WEST: Committee Taps Akin Gump Strauss Hauer as Counsel

NINE WEST: Committee Taps Houlihan Lokey as Investment Banker
NINE WEST: Committee Taps Protiviti Inc as Financial Advisor
OPT CO: Approval Hearing on Plan Outline Set for June 13
PNEUMA INTERNATIONAL: Distribution to Unsecureds Raised to $1.5MM
R44 LENDING: Hires Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, APLC, as Insolvency Counsel

RAIN TREE HEALTHCARE: District Ct. Affirms Dismissal of Ch. 11 Case
RESOLUTE FOREST: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable & Affirms 'BB-' CCR
ROCKDALE HOSPITALITY: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral on Final Basis
SCHRATTER FOODS: Chapter 727 Claims Bar Date Set for Aug. 28
SEABOARD REALTY: Court Junks UCF Suit vs Berkowitz

SHERIDAN PRODUCTION I-A: $98MM Bank Debt Trades at 16.17% Off
SHERIDAN PRODUCTION I-M: $60MM Bank Debt Trades at 16.17% Off
SHERIDAN PRODUCTION: $900MM Bank Debt Trades at 16.17% Off
SIGEL'S BEVERAGES: Amended Plan Outline OK'd; June 13 Plan Hearing
SOAR INTO YOUR DESTINY: Wants Emergency Access to Cash Collateral

TAYLOR BEAN: Summary Judgment Ruling Against Cocrofts Upheld
TOP SHELV: Res Judicata Bars Claim Invalidating AG&I Lien
TRIGEANT HOLDINGS: Renewed Bid for Stay Pending Appeal Nixed
WALL STREET THEATER: Needs Time to Resolve Tax Credit Disbursements
WESTMORELAND COAL: Repays in Full All Outstanding Loan with CIBC

WILMINGTON VICTORVILLE: Hires Levene Neale as Bankruptcy Counsel
ZIP STEVENSON: Seeks Approval of Cash Collateral Stipulation
[*] $308,956 in Defaulted Timeshare Loans Up for Auction on June 7

                            *********

8 LAWRENCE ROAD: Taps Richard Shackil as Special Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
8 Lawrence Road, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of New Jersey to hire the Law Office of Richard
Shackil as special counsel.

The Debtor requires the services of a real estate attorney in
connection with the sale of the Debtor's rela property located at 8
Lawrence Road, Randolf, New Jersey 07869. The Law Office of Richard
Shackil will coordinate the closing, and provide any similar and
other services.

The Law Office of Richard Shackil will charge a flat fee $1,500.

Richard Shackil, Esq., sole practitioner of the Law Office of
Richard Shackil, assures the Court that he does not holdor
represemt an adverse interest to the estate, and is a disinterested
under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(14).

The counsel can be reached through:

     Richard Shackil, Esq.
     Law Office of Richard Shackil
     1113 Main Street
     Patterson, NJ 07503
     Phone: +1 973-684-5676

                     About 8 Lawrence Road

8 Lawrence Road, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-11389) on Jan. 23, 2018.
At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less
than $1 million and liabilities of less than $500,000.  SCURA,
WIGFIELD, HEYER & STEVENS, LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


ABE'S BOAT: Hires Lott Firm PLLC as Counsel
-------------------------------------------
Abe's Boat Rentals, Inc., seeks authority from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (New
Orleans) to hire Marc Hoerner, Jr., Esq. and The Lott Firm PLLC as
counsel.

Lott Firm's current hourly rates are:

     Marc Hoerner    $150
     Lyan Lott       $250

Marc Hoerner of Lott Firm PLLC attests that he and his firm
currently have no connection with the Debtor, creditors and any
party in interest.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Marc Hoerner, Jr., Esq.
     THE LOTT FIRM
     3422 Rosefinch Trail
     Austin, TX 78746
     Tel: 512-809-6951
     E-mail: marcthelottfirm@gmail.com
             thelottfirm@gmail.com

                   About Abe's Boat Rentals

Abe's Boat Rentals, Inc. -- https://www.abesboatrental.com/ -- is a
privately owned vessel operator located in Belle Chasse, Louisiana
with a fleet of 19 vessels.  The Company's business segments have
expanded to also provide crews and vessels for environmental
construction, restoration projects and cleanup, plugging and
abandonment, rig decommissioning and other new markets.  Abe's Boat
Rentals was founded in 1979 by Abraham Ton.

Abe's Boat Rentals, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.
La. Case no. 18-11102) on April 27, 2018. The petition was signed
by Hank Ton, president.

Marc Hoerner, Jr., Esq., at THE LOTT FIRM, is the Debtor's
counsel.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and liabilities.


AFTERMASTER INC: Operating Costs Raise Going Concern Doubt
----------------------------------------------------------
AfterMaster, Inc., filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net income of $2,210,813 on $441,196 of total revenues
for the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared with a net loss
of $2,269,339 on $266,621 of total revenues for the same period in
2017.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2018, the Company recorded a
net loss of $642,696 on $1,391,658 of total revenues, compared to a
net loss of $6,636,058 on $369,844 of total revenues for the same
period last year.

At March 31, 2018, the Company had total assets of $1.09 million,
total liabilities of $8.14 million, and $7.05 million in total
stockholders' deficit.

The Company has an accumulated deficit of $72,946,247, negative
working capital of $7,320,108, and currently has revenues which are
insufficient to cover its operating costs, which raises substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  The
Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues
sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as
a going concern.

The future of the Company as an operating business will depend on
its ability to (1) obtain sufficient capital contributions and/or
financing as may be required to sustain its operations and (2) to
achieve adequate revenues from its ProMaster and AfterMaster
businesses.  Management's plan to address these issues includes,
(a) continued exercise of tight cost controls to conserve cash, (b)
obtaining additional financing, (c) more widely commercializing the
AfterMaster and ProMaster products, and (d) identifying and
executing on additional revenue generating opportunities.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://bit.ly/2L5wfJV

                       About AfterMaster, Inc.

AfterMaster, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an
audio technology company in the United States.  It develops and
commercializes proprietary audio and video technologies for
professional and consumer use. The company offers AfterMaster
audio, a mastering, remastering, and audio processing technology
that makes various audio source sounds louder, fuller, deeper, and
clearer; ProMaster, an online music mastering, streaming, and
storage service designed for independent artists; and Aftermaster
Pro, a personal audio re-mastering device.  The company was
formerly known as Studio One Media, Inc., and changed its name to
AfterMaster, Inc., in September 2015.  AfterMaster, Inc. is based
in Scottsdale, Arizona.




ALEGION INC: Court Grants Request Not to Appoint Committee
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Alabama
granted Alegion Inc.'s motion not to appoint a committee of
unsecured creditors in its Chapter 11 case.

Alegion Inc. is represented by:

     Michael A. Fritz, Sr., Esq.
     Fritz Law Firm
     25 South Court Street, Suite 200
     Montgomery, AL 36104
     Phone: (334) 230-9790
     Email: bankruptcy@fritzlawalabama.com

                        About Alegion Inc.

Alegion, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Ala. Case No. 18-30912) on March 29, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Tammy Jordan, owner, the Debtor disclosed
that it had estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities
of less than $50,000.  

Judge Dwight H. Williams Jr. presides over the case.  The Debtor
tapped Fritz Law Firm as its legal counsel.


ALLIED IV LLC: Seeks Exclusivity Extension, Authority to Use Cash
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Allied IV, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of New York to: (a) authorize its use of cash collateral
under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, and (b) to extend the
exclusive period to file and to solicit acceptances to a plan of
reorganization for an additional 120 days.

The Debtor owns the real property at 113-18 Liberty Avenue,
Richmond Hill, New York 11419.  The Debtor purchased the Property
for $5,650,000 from Century 2000 Custom Home Builders.  At closing,
Century 2000 informed Debtor for the first time of the existence an
alleged right of refusal held by the Grocery Store Tenant.  The
Debtor paid $3,650,000 in cash and a $2,050,000 purchase money
mortgage in favor of Century 2000.

The purchase money mortgage was to be repaid following the
resolution of the right of first refusal issue.  The right of first
refusal issue appeared to be resolved in October 2014.  But when
the Debtor was preparing to refinance the purchase money mortgage,
the Furniture Store Tenant, placed a lis pendens on the Property.

The Furniture Store Tenant refuses to remove its lis pendens
because the continuing existence of Century 2000's mortgage
constitutes equity from which it hopes to collect a judgment
against Century 2000. The Furniture Store Tenant argued that the
Century 2000/Seller agreed to use its best efforts to subdivide the
Property and sell to Tenant the portion of the Property it was
leasing.

The Furniture Store Tenant sued the Debtor and Century 2000. The
dispute is being litigated in the Queens County Supreme Court in
113 Discount Bazaar Inc, And 113 Furniture Bazaar Inc. v. Century
2000 Custom Home Builders & Developers, LLC, Century Custom, Home
Builders & Developers, LLC, Phillip Baldeo and Allied IV LLC, Index
No. 705383/2013.

To date, the Debtor has continuously paid as agreed on the purchase
money mortgage.  But based on the Debtor's failure to close on the
refinancing in 2014, (which was obstructed solely by the fight
between Century 2000 and the Tenant), Century 2000 put the Debtor
in default on the purchase money mortgage and asserts 24% default
interest.

To emerge from bankruptcy, therefore, the Debtor intends to stop
the bleeding by refinancing the undisputed portion of the purchase
money mortgage free and clear of the Tenants' lis pendens, obtain a
determination of the legitimate amounts due to creditors and then
pay that amount, to bring this matter to a conclusion.

The Property’s monthly income is approximately $50,000.
Meanwhile, the Debtor proposes to use the Property's rents to fund
mortgage interest payments at the contract rate, real estate taxes,
insurance, management fees and a reserve for emergency repairs.

The Debtor proposes to (a) use cash collateral only in the ordinary
course of business to preserve and protect the Property, (b)
maintain strict records regarding cash collateral, (c) furnish
Century 2000 with monthly operating reports required by the U.S.
Trustee, (d) provide Century 2000 with a replacement lien on the
Debtor's assets for any erosion of Century 2000's cash collateral
because of the Debtor's use of the rents, and (e) pay monthly
interest at the contract rate to reduce the Debtor's Mortgage
obligations.

The Debtor believes that Century 2000 is adequately protected by
the Property's large equity cushion. The Debtor estimates that the
Property value is $10,000,000. Moreover, the Debtor claims that the
use of cash collateral in the ordinary course of business will
allow the Debtor to preserve and protect the Property. Thus, the
Debtor argues that the use of cash collateral does not decline in
value during this case and thereby protecting Century 2000's
collateral, including cash collateral.

The Debtor needs additional time to bring the Landlord to the
table. Essentially the Debtor seeks to extend the status quo
regarding the disbursement of rent and payment of expenses.  The
Debtor asserts that once the bar date expires on May 29, 2018 it
will be in a better position to deal with Century 2000, which is
the Debtor's big confirmation obstacle.  Accordingly, the Debtor
submits that cause exists to extend the Exclusive Periods for an
additional 120 days since it has been complying with its
obligations under the Code and implementing its reorganization
strategy as articulated at the outset.

A hearing will be held on June 22, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. to (a)
consider the Debtor's application to use cash collateral and (b) to
extend the Debtor's exclusive period to file and to solicit
acceptances to a plan of reorganization.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb18-40884-31.pdf

                      About Allied IV, LLC

Allied IV, LLC, listed itself as a single asset real estate, as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B).  The Company is the fee
simple owner of a real property located at 113-18 Liberty Avenue
Richmond Hill, New York 11419 valued by the Company at $10 million.
Allied IV filed as a domestic limited liability company in the
State of New York on Aug. 15, 2013.

Allied IV LLC, based in Great Neck, NY, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-40884) on Feb. 19, 2018.

In the petition signed by Bahram Hakakian, as officer of Venture
Realty Inc., the Debtor's managing member, the Debtor estimated $10
million in assets and $2.11 million in liabilities.

The Hon. Elizabeth S. Stong presides over the case.

Mark A. Frankel, Esq., at Backenroth Frankel & Krinsky, LLP, serves
as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.  Coritsidis & Lambros, PLLC,
is the special real estate and litigation counsel.


AMBOY GROUP: Seeks to Hire Integrated Property Group as Brokers
---------------------------------------------------------------
Amboy Group, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Distirct of New Jersey to hire
Integrated Property Group d/b/a/ Auction Advisors as Debtor's
brokers.

The professsional services to be rendered are to market and sell
real property located at 1 amboy Avenue, Woodbridge, New Jersey and
if necessary, schedule an auction sale to occur no later than
September 1, 2018.

The proposed arranngement for compensation is 5% commission plus
actual incurred out of pocket expenses on the purchase price.  If
the property is sold to the credit bidder, compensation shall be 1%
plus actual incurred out of pocket expenses.

Integrated Property Group does not hold or represent an adverse
interest to the estate and is a disinterested person under 11
U.S.C. Sec. 101(14).

The broker can be reached through:

     AuctionAdvisors
     26 Park Street, Suite 2200
     Montclair, NJ 07042

                       About Amboy Group

Amboy Group LLC, d/b/a Tommy Moloney's, d/b/a Agnelli's Gourmet,
d/b/a Amboy Cold Storage, is a provider of food products and
temperature controlled warehouses. Its food processing and cold
storage facility serves as a manufacturer/ distributor of authentic
Irish and Italian meat products in America.  Amboy Group's facility
is USDA, FDA and SQF 2000 certified.

CLU Amboy, LLC, is the fee simple owner of a real property located
at 1 Amboy Avenue Woodbridge, NJ 07095 with an appraised value of
$13 million.  CLU Amboy reported gross revenue of $624,444 in 2016
and gross revenue of $644,066 in 2015.

Amboy Group holds a 51% interest in an American entity known as
Parmacotta-Amboy NA, LLC that distributes Italian meats.  The
remaining 49% is owned by an American entity known as Parmacotto
America.  Parmacotto America is owned by Paramcotto sPa.
Parmacotto sPa has been subject to insolvency proceedings in Italy
for approximately two and half years, during which time, no revenue
has flowed from Parmacotto sPa to Amboy Group.  Amboy Group's gross
revenue amounted to $10.01 million in 2016 and $6.26 million in
2015.

Amboy Group LLC and its affiliate CLU Amboy filed Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. D.N.J. Case Nos. 17-31653 and 17-31647) on Oct.
25, 2017.  At the time of filing, the Amboy Group reported $1.48
million in assets and $7.11 million in liabilities, while CLU Amboy
reported $13.34 million in assets and $10.78 million in
liabilities.

The Hon. Christine M. Gravelle presides over the case.

The Debtors tapped Anthony Sodono, III, Esq., and Sari Blair
Placona, Esq., of Trenk, DiPasquale, Della Fera & Sodono, P.C., as
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtors hired Reitler Kailas & Rosenblatt
LLC as special counsel, and Thomas A. Ferro, P.C., as their
accountant.  The Debtors also tapped Sout Risius Ross Advisors,
LLC, and its affiliate Stout Risius Ross, LLC, as financial advisor
and investment banker.


AMBOY GROUP: Seeks to Hire M. Davis Group as Appraiser
------------------------------------------------------
Amboy Group, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of New Jersey to hire an appraiser.

The Debtor proposes to employ M. Davis Group to conduct an
appraisal of its slicing machine. M. Davis Group charges $2,500 per
day plus expenses for its services plus $3,000 for the report.

Maxwell Davis attests that M. Davis Group is a "disinterested
person" as defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

         Maxwell Davis
         M. Davis Group
         2300 Palmer Street
         Pittsburgh, PA 15218
         Phone: 412-521-5751

                      About Amboy Group

Amboy Group LLC, d/b/a Tommy Moloney's, d/b/a Agnelli's Gourmet,
d/b/a Amboy Cold Storage, is a provider of food products and
temperature controlled warehouses. Its food processing and cold
storage facility serves as a manufacturer/ distributor of authentic
Irish and Italian meat products in America.  Amboy Group's facility
is USDA, FDA and SQF 2000 certified.

CLU Amboy, LLC, is the fee simple owner of a real property located
at 1 Amboy Avenue Woodbridge, NJ 07095 with an appraised value of
$13 million. CLU Amboy reported gross revenue of $624,444 in 2016
and gross revenue of $644,066 in 2015.

Amboy Group holds a 51% interest in an American entity known as
Parmacotta-Amboy NA, LLC that distributes Italian meats.  The
remaining 49% is owned by an American entity known as Parmacotto
America. Parmacotto America is owned by Paramcotto sPa.  Parmacotto
sPa has been subject to insolvency proceedings in Italy for
approximately two and half years, during which time, no revenue has
flowed from Parmacotto sPa to Amboy Group.  Amboy Group's gross
revenue amounted to $10.01 million in 2016 and $6.26 million in
2015.

Amboy Group LLC and its affiliate CLU Amboy filed Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. D.N.J. Case Nos. 17-31653 and 17-31647) on Oct.
25, 2017.  At the time of filing, the Amboy Group reported $1.48
million in assets and $7.11 million in liabilities, while CLU Amboy
reported $13.34 million in assets and $10.78 million in
liabilities.

The Hon. Christine M. Gravelle presides over the case.

The Debtors tapped Anthony Sodono, III, Esq., and Sari Blair
Placona, Esq., of Trenk, DiPasquale, Della Fera & Sodono, P.C., as
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtors hired Reitler Kailas & Rosenblatt
LLC as special counsel, and Thomas A. Ferro, P.C., as their
accountant.  The Debtors also tapped Sout Risius Ross Advisors,
LLC, and its affiliate Stout Risius Ross, LLC, as financial advisor
and investment banker.


AMERICAN UNDERWRITING: Taps Small Herrin LLP as Attorney
--------------------------------------------------------
American Underwriting Services, LLC, seeks authority from the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia
(Atlanta) to hire Small Herrin, LLP, as its attorneys.

Services to be rendered by Small Herrin are:

     a. prepare amendments to the schedules, statement of financial
affairs, pleadings and applications in this case;

     b. conduct examinations incidental to administration of this
case;

     c. develop the relationship of Petitioner to the claims of
creditors in this
case;

     d. advise Petitioner of its rights, duties, and obligations as
Debtor- in-Possession;

     e. consult with Petitioner and representing Petitioner with
respect to a Chapter 11 plan;

     f. represent Petitioner in litigation that is currently
pending or that may be
brought at a later date; and

     g. take any and all other necessary action incident to the
proper preservation
and administration of Petitioner's bankruptcy estate.

The standard hourly rates of Small Herrin, LLP, are:

     Gus H. Small            $500
     Anna M. Humnicky        $350
     Brent W. Herrin         $350
     Benjamin S. Klehr       $325
     Paralegals           $100 to $150

Anna M. Humnicky, a partner at Small Herrin, LLP, attests that
neither Small Herrin, LLP, nor the attorneys employed by Small
Herrin, LLP, hold or represent any interests that are adverse to
Petitioner or the Estate.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Anna Mari Humnicky, Esq.
     Gus H. Small, Esq.
     SMALL HERRIN, LLP
     Suite 200, Two Paces West
     2727 Paces Ferry Road
     Atlanta, GA 30339
     Tel: (770) 783-1800
     Fax: (404) 332-0315
     E-mail: ahumnicky@smallherrin.com
             gsmall@smallherrin.com

            About American Underwriting Services

American Underwriting Services, LLC  --
http://www.americanunderwritingservices.com/-- is a program
underwriter based in Atlanta, Georgia. The company specializes in
insurance products for the transportation industry, including
commercial auto liability, motor truck cargo, auto physical damage,
property, and general liability lines of business.

American Underwriting Services filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
N.D. Ga. Case No. 18-58406) on May 18, 2018, listing $1.45 million
in assets and $8.38 million in liabilitied.  The petition was
signed by James Russell Wiley, sole SH of The Wiley Group, Inc.,
manager.

Anna Mari Humnicky, Esq., and Gus H. Small, Esq., at Small Herrin,
serve as the Debtor's counsel.  Kevin Van de Grift at GGG Partners,
LLC, is the Debtor's chief restructuring officer.


ARECONT VISION: Judge OKs $4-Mil DIP Loans, Cash Collateral Use
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Christopher S. Sontchi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware has signed an interim order authorizing
Arecont Vision Holdings, LLC, and its affiliated debtors to use
cash collateral and to borrow up to the maximum principal amount
not to exceed $4,000,000 from American General Life Insurance
Company, American Home Assurance Company, The United States Life
Insurance Company in the City of New York and The Variable Annuity
Life Insurance Company.

However, until entry of a Final Order, the maximum principal amount
of the DIP Loans outstanding at any time will not exceed $2,750,000
on the terms and conditions set forth in the DIP Loan Documents and
the Interim Order. The DIP Obligations are subject to (i) a
Facility Fee of $80,000 (2%) and (ii) interest at the annual rate
of 8% per annum.  Accrued Interest earned will be payable monthly
in cash.

As security for the DIP Obligations, Cortland Capital Market
Services LLC as agent for the DIP Facility and for the benefit of
the DIP Lenders, will have (a) valid, binding, fully perfected,
enforceable and non-avoidable first priority, senior priming liens
on and security interests in all now owned or hereafter acquired
assets and property of the Debtors that is not otherwise subject to
the Permitted Existing Liens; and (b) valid, perfected, enforceable
and non-avoidable second priority or other junior liens on and
security interests in all now owned or hereafter acquired assets
and property of the Debtors that are subject to valid and
properly-perfected, non-avoidable liens and security interests in
existence as of the Petition Date other than the Prepetition Liens.


The DIP Liens are senior and superior in priority to all other
secured and unsecured creditors of the Debtors' estates, subject
only to the Carve-Out and the Permitted Existing Liens.

Prior to Petition Date, the Debtors, the financial institutions
parties thereto from time to time as senior noteholders
("Prepetition Senior Lenders"), and the financial institutions
parties thereto from time to time as subordinated noteholders
("Prepetition Subordinated Lenders") are parties to a Note Purchase
Agreement.  The Prepetition Obligations to the Senior Prepetition
Lenders are secured by first priority liens and security interests
granted to U.S. Bank National Association, as first lien collateral
agent for the benefit of itself and the Prepetition Senior Lenders.
As of the Petition Date, the Debtors are liable for payment of the
Prepetition Obligations, and the Prepetition Obligations will be an
allowed secured claim in an amount not less than $73,200,000.

As adequate protection of the interests of the Prepetition Senior
Lenders in the pre-petition collateral and solely to the extent of
any diminution in the value of the pre-petition collateral, U.S.
Bank, for the benefit of itself and the Prepetition Senior Lenders,
is granted valid, binding, enforceable and perfected postpetition
security interests in and liens on the DIP Collateral. In addition,
the Prepetition Subordinated Lenders will also be granted valid,
binding, enforceable and perfected postpetition security interests
in and liens on the DIP Collateral.

A hearing on the final approval of the DIP Credit Facility is
scheduled for June 8, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.  Any party-in-interest
objecting to the entry of the proposed Final Order will file and
serve written objections by no later than June 1.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order is available at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb18-11142-44.pdf

                      About Arecont Vision

Arecont Vision -- https://www.arecontvision.com/ -- is in the
business of designing, manufacturing, distributing and selling
IP-based megapixel cameras for use in video surveillance
applications globally, serving a broad range of industries
including data centers, government, retail, financial, sports
stadiums and healthcare.  Arecont Vision offers seven megapixel
product families ranging from MegaVideo, single-sensor cameras from
1 to 10 megapixels and SurroundVideo multi-sensor cameras from 8 to
40 megapixels at various price points. The Company differentiates
itself from its competitors with in-house technology development
capabilities, with 18 issued patents. Arecont Vision is
headquartered in Glendale, California.

Arecont Vision Holdings, LLC, and affiliates Arecont Vision, LLC,
and Arecont Vision IC DISC concurrently filed voluntary petitions
for relief under Chapter 11 (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-11142)
on May 14, 2018.

In the petition signed by CRO Scott T. Avila, Arecont Vision
Holdings estimated $50,000 in assets and $50 million to $100
million in liabilities.

The Debtor tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; Imperial Capital, LLC as investment bankers; Armory
Strategic Partners, LLC as advisor; and Rust Consulting/Omni
Bankruptcy as claims agent.


ARECONT VISION: Taps Armory Strategic Partners as Financial Advisor
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Arecont Vision Holdings, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek
approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to hire Armory Strategic Partners, LLC, to provide T.
Scott Avila as Chief Restructuring Officer of the Debtors, provide
additional personnel, and provide financial advisory and
restructuring-related services to the Debtors.

Services to be provided by  Mr. Avila, with the assistance of the
Additional Personnel, are:

     (a) manage and direct cash management and cash flow
forecasting processes, including the monitoring of actual cash flow
versus projections;

     (b) analyze the Debtors' liquidity outlook, debt service
capacity and appropriate capital structure;

     (c) identify various operational, managerial, financial and
strategic restructuring alternatives, implement and effectuate any
appropriate restructuring agreements with the Debtors' secured
lenders, and understand the business and financial impact of same,
which may include the marketing or recapitalization of the assets
or membership interests of the Debtors;

     (d) prepare and direct the preparation of contingency plans to
reflect the impact of restructuring alternatives;

     (e) communicate and negotiate with the Debtors' stakeholders,
including its secured lenders, significant vendors, etc.;

     (f) subject to the limitations contained in the Engagement
Letter and in Appendix A thereto, prepare various financial reports
which may be required during discussions with the Debtors' lenders
and other stakeholders; and

     (g) provide advice and recommendations with respect to other
related matters as the Debtors or their professionals may request
from time to time, as agreed to by Armory.

Armory's professional fees for the Services will range from $395 to
$675 per hour, depending on the personnel assigned to the
particular task.

T. Scott Avila, CEO of Armory Strategic Partners, attests that
Armory has not represented any Potential Parties in Interest in
connection with matters relating to the Debtors, their estates,
assets, or businesses and will not represent other entities which
are creditors of, or have other relationships to, the Debtors in
matters relating to these chapter 11 cases.

The firm can be reached through:

     T. Scott Avila
     Armory Strategic Partners, LLC
     1230 Rosecrans Avenue
     Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
     Phone: 310-220-6400
     Fax: 310-798-6277

                 About Arecont Vision Holdings

Arecont Vision Holdings, LLC -- https://www.arecontvision.com/ --
is in the business of designing, manufacturing, distributing and
selling IP-based megapixel cameras for use in video surveillance
applications globally, serving a broad range of industries
including data centers, government, retail, financial, sports
stadiums and healthcare.  The company offers seven megapixel
product families ranging from MegaVideo, single-sensor cameras from
1 to 10 megapixels and SurroundVideo multi-sensor cameras from 8 to
40 megapixels at various price points.  Arecont  differentiates
itself from its competitors with in-house technology development
capabilities, with 18 issued patents.  It is headquartered in
Glendale, California.

Arecont Vision Holdings sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 18-11142 to 18-11144) on
May 14, 2018.  In the petitions signed by Scott T. Avila, chief
restructuring officer, the Debtors estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of $50 million to $100 million.   

The Debtors tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as their legal
counsel; Imperial Capital LLC as investment banker; and Armory
Strategic Partners, LLC, as financial advisor.


ARECONT VISION: Taps Imperial Capital, LLC as Investment Banker
---------------------------------------------------------------
Arecont Vision Holdings, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek
approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to hire Imperial Capital, LLC as investment banker and
financial advisor to the Debtors.

Services to be provided by Imperial are:

     (a) provide financial valuation of the ongoing operations of
the Debtors;

     (b) assist the Debtors in developing, evaluating, structuring
and negotiating the terms and conditions of a potential
Restructuring, including the value of the securities, if any, that
may be issued to certain creditors as part of the Restructuring;

     (c) assist the Debtors in the preparation of solicitation
materials with respect to a potential M&A Transaction;

     (d) assist the Debtors in developing, evaluating, structuring
and negotiating the terms and conditions of a potential Financing;

     (e) assist the Debtors in developing, evaluating, structuring
and negotiating the terms and conditions of a potential M&A
Transaction; and

     (f) provide such other financial advisory services including
any testimony that may be required in connection with any
proceeding to approve any transaction with respect to the Debtors'
financial issues as may from time to time be agreed upon between
the Debtors and Imperial.

Imperial's compensation consists of:

     (a) One-Time Payment. On account of previously deferred
portions of monthly fees payable under the Debtors' prior
engagement letter with Imperial dated October 10, 2017 and waived,
a one-time payment of $50,000 has been paid.

     (b) Monthly Fee. A financial advisory fee of $75,000 per
month, payable monthly in advance during the term of
the Engagement Letter. The first Monthly Advisory Fee was paid upon
execution of the Engagement Letter and covered services rendered by
Imperial from January 1, 2018 to January 31, 2018. Each subsequent
Monthly Advisory Fee shall be payable in advance on the first day
of the new monthly period. Fifty percent (50%) of the Monthly
Advisory Fee will be credited against any Financing, M&A
Transaction Fee, Secondary Debt Transaction Fee or Restructuring
Fee ultimately payable under the Engagement Letter.

      (c) Financing Fee. A financing fee, payable in cash upon the
closing of, and out of the proceeds of, any financing transaction,
equal to 5.0% of the commitment amount of any Financing (debt or
equity) up to $20,000,000 and 2.5% of the commitment amount of any
Financing exceeding $20,000,000 arranged by Imperial for the
Debtors, provided, however, that no Financing Transaction Fee shall
be payable on account of any Financing provided by (a) Michael
Kaplinsky, (b) Vladimir Berezin, or (c) AIG Investment Management
(U.S.), LLC.

      (d) M&A Transaction Fee. A M&A Transaction fee, payable in
cash upon the closing of a M&A Transaction, equal to the sum of (i)
$500,000, plus (ii) 2.0% of Transaction Consideration between
$10,000,000 and $20,000,000, plus (iii) 2.5% of Transaction
Considerations in excess of $20,000,000. A M&A Transaction shall be
deemed to have been consummated upon the earliest of any of the
following events to occur: (a) the acquisition of a majority of the
outstanding common stock of the Debtors by the buyer; (b) a merger
or consolidation of the Debtors with or into the buyer; (c) the
acquisition by the buyer of substantially all of the Debtors'
assets; or (d) in the case of any other M&A Transaction, the
consummation thereof. For avoidance of doubt, a successful credit
bid by AIG shall not constitute an M&A Transaction. In the event
that the consideration in a M&A Transaction is paid in whole or in
part in the form of securities or other assets, the value of such
securities or other assets, for the purposes of calculating the M&A
Transaction Fee, shall be the fair market value thereof, as the
parties hereto shall mutually agree, on the day prior to the
consummation of the M&A Transaction; provided, however, that, if
such consideration includes securities with an existing public
trading market, the value thereof shall be determined by the
average closing price for such securities over the last 10 trading
days immediately prior to such consummation. In the event that AIG
(or its successor in interest) acquires the Debtors or all or
substantially all of its assets by means of a successful "credit
bid" of all or a portion of the AIG Notes in an auction conducted
under chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code, Imperial
shall be entitled to a fixed M&A Transaction Fee of $500,000 to be
reduced by the credits of the Monthly Advisory Fee paid.

     (e) Secondary Debt Transaction Fee. In the event that Imperial
arranges a Secondary Debt Transaction, a fee, payable in cash upon
the closing and from the proceeds of such Secondary Debt
Transaction, equal to (i) 1% of the first $20,000,000 of proceeds,
plus (ii) 2% of the next $10,000,000 of proceeds, plus (iii) 3% of
proceeds above $30,000,000.

     (f) Restructuring Fee. A Restructuring transaction fee,
payable in cash upon the closing of a Restructuring transaction,
equal to $500,000.

John E. Mack, III, Executive Vice President of Imperial Capital,
LLC, attests that is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of
section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code; does not hold or represent
an interest adverse to the Debtors' estates; and (c) has no
connection to the Debtors, their creditors or related parties.

The firm can be reached through:

     John E. Mack, III
     Imperial Capital, LLC
     10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2400
     Los Angeles, CA 90067
     Office: (310) 246-3700
     Toll Free: (800) 929-2299
     Fax: (310) 777-3000

                  About Arecont Vision Holdings

Arecont Vision Holdings, LLC -- https://www.arecontvision.com/ --
is in the business of designing, manufacturing, distributing and
selling IP-based megapixel cameras for use in video surveillance
applications globally, serving a broad range of industries
including data centers, government, retail, financial, sports
stadiums and healthcare.  The company offers seven megapixel
product families ranging from MegaVideo, single-sensor cameras from
1 to 10 megapixels and SurroundVideo multi-sensor cameras from 8 to
40 megapixels at various price points.  Arecont  differentiates
itself from its competitors with in-house technology development
capabilities, with 18 issued patents.  It is headquartered in
Glendale, California.

Arecont Vision Holdings sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 18-11142 to 18-11144) on
May 14, 2018.  In the petitions signed by Scott T. Avila, chief
restructuring officer, the Debtors estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of $50 million to $100 million.   

The Debtors tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as their legal
counsel; Imperial Capital LLC as investment banker; and Armory
Strategic Partners, LLC, as financial advisor.


ARECONT VISION: Taps Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Arecont Vision Holdings, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek
approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to hire Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as counsel for
the Debtors.

The professional services that PSZ&J will provide are:

     a. provide legal advice with respect to the Debtors' powers
and duties as debtors in possession in the continued operation of
their business and management of their property;

     b. prepare on behalf of the Debtors any necessary
applications, motions, answers, orders, reports, and other legal
papers;

     c. appear in Court on behalf of the Debtors;

     d. assist the Debtors with the completion of sales of their
assets;

     e. prepare and pursue confirmation of a plan and approval of a
disclosure statement; and

     f. perform other legal services for the Debtors that may be
necessary and proper in these proceedings.

PSZ&J's current standard hourly rates are:

     Partners                $650 to $1,295
     Of Counsel              $595 to $1,025
     Associates              $495 to $595
     Paraprofessionals       $295 to $395

Ira D. Kharasch, Esq., partner at the firm, attests that PSZ&J does
not hold or represent any interest adverse to the Debtors' estates
and is a "disinterested person" as that phrase is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The counsel can be reached through:

     James E. O'Neill, Esq.
     Ira D. Kharasch, Esq.
     Maxim B. Litvak, Esq.
     PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP
     919 North Market Street, 17th Floor
     P.O. Box 8705
     Wilmington, DE 19899-8705
     Tel: 302-652-4100
     Fax: 302-652-4400
     E-mail: jo'neill@pszjlaw.com
             ikharasch@pszjlaw.com
             mlitvak@pszjlaw.com

                  About Arecont Vision Holdings

Arecont Vision Holdings, LLC -- https://www.arecontvision.com/ --
is in the business of designing, manufacturing, distributing and
selling IP-based megapixel cameras for use in video surveillance
applications globally, serving a broad range of industries
including data centers, government, retail, financial, sports
stadiums and healthcare.  The company offers seven megapixel
product families ranging from MegaVideo, single-sensor cameras from
1 to 10 megapixels and SurroundVideo multi-sensor cameras from 8 to
40 megapixels at various price points.  Arecont  differentiates
itself from its competitors with in-house technology development
capabilities, with 18 issued patents.  It is headquartered in
Glendale, California.

Arecont Vision Holdings sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 18-11142 to 18-11144) on
May 14, 2018.  In the petitions signed by Scott T. Avila, chief
restructuring officer, the Debtors estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of $50 million to $100 million.   

The Debtors tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as their legal
counsel; Imperial Capital LLC as investment banker; and Armory
Strategic Partners, LLC, as financial advisor.


B N EMPIRE: Taps Doyle & McGrath Real Estate as Brokers
-------------------------------------------------------
B N Empire, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Middle District of Florida to employ John Doyle and Margaret
McGrath and Doyle & McGrath Real Estate, LLC as real estate brokers
for the Debtor.

The Debtor owns real property located at 10915 N. 56th Street,
Temple Terrace, Florida.  The Property is a retail strip center and
is income producing.  John Doyle and Margaret McGrath as Brokers
will market, advertise and otherwise attempt to find a buyer for
the Property. In the event of a sale, the Debtor will pay Brokers a
commission of (5%) of the gross purchase price.

John Doyle, broker at Doyle & McGrath Real Estate, LLC, attests
that neither he nor any employee of the broker has or has in the
past maintained any of the relationships described in the statutory
definition of disinterestedness as set forth in 11 U.S.C. Sec.
101(14).

The broker can be reached through:

     John Doyle
     Doyle & McGrath Real Estate, LLC
     19005 Dale Mabry Hwy
     Lutz, FL 33548
     Phone: +1 813-948-7368

                         About B N Empire

B N Empire, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-07841) on Sept. 5, 2017.  In its petition
signed by Rajesh Bahl, its manager, the Debtor estimated $1 million
to $10 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns, LLP, is the
Debtor's counsel.


BIG BEAR BOWLING: Taps Russell C. Barnes as Broker
--------------------------------------------------
Big Bear Bowling Barn, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to hire
Russell C. Barnes as broker to market and sell the Debtor's
property located at 40679 Big Bear Blvd., Big Bear Lake, California
92315.

The broker will provide services such as advertising the property,
showing the property to interested parties, representing the estate
as seller in connection with the sale of the property, representing
the estate with respect to obtaining the highest and best offers
available in the present market for the property.

The brokers commission will 5% of the negotiated gross sales price,
to be equally divided between the listing and selling brokers.

The broker can be reached through:

     Russel C. Barnes
     270 Andes Lane
     Big Bear Lake, CA 92315


                  About Big Bear Bowling Barn

Big Bear Bowling Barn, Inc., owns the Bowling Barn located at 40625
Big Bear Boulevard, Big Bear Lake, California.  Bowling Barn is a
16-lane bowling facility.  The company is a small business debtor
as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51D) reporting gross revenue of
$1.59 million in 2017 and gross revenue of $1.42 million in 2016.

Big Bear Bowling Barn sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-12715) on April 2,
2018.  In the petition signed by William Ross, president, the
Debtor disclosed $1.51 million in assets and $2.18 million in
liabilities.  Judge Scott C. Clarkson presides over the case.


BIRDHOUSE LLC: Hires Miller & Miller as Attorney
------------------------------------------------
Birdhouse, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division, to hire Edward M.
Miller and Miller & Miller, LLP, as attorneys.

Service to be rendered by Miller and MMLLP are:

     a) advise the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties as
debtor and debtor-in-possession;

     b) prepare and file any necessary preliminary motions;

     c) negotiate with representatives of creditors and other
parties in interest and advise and consult on the conduct of the
case, including all legal and administrative requirements of
Chapter 11;

     d) take all necessary action to protect and preserve the
Debtor’s estate, including the prosecution of actions on its
behalf, the defense of any actions commenced against the estate,
negotiations concerning all litigation in which the Debtor may be
involved, and objections to claims filed against the estate;

     e) prepare on behalf of the Debtor all motions, applications,
answers, orders, reports, and papers necessary to the
administration of the estate;

     f) negotiate and prepare on the Debtor’s behalf one or more
plans of reorganization, a disclosure statement, and all related
agreements and/or documents and take any necessary action on behalf
of the Debtor to obtain confirmation of such plans;

     g) advise the Debtor in connection with the sale or other
disposition of assets;

     h) appear before this Court, any state court in any matters
related to this case, any appellate courts, and the U.S. Trustee,
and protect the interest of the Debtor’s Estate before them and
provide necessary legal advice to the Debtor in connection with its
Chapter 11 case.

Edward M. Miller of Miller & Miller, LLP, attests that he and his
firm are each a "disinterested person" as that term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and within the meaning of
Section 327 of the Bankruptcy Code, and no person associated with
Miller or MMLLP has served as an examiner in this Bankruptcy case.

The rate to be applied to this case will be $250.00 per hour and
will remain fixed for the life of the case.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Edward M. Miller, Esq.
     Miller & Miller, LLP
     39 N. Court St.
     Westminster, MD 21157
     Phone: 410-751-5444
     E-mail: mmllplawyers@verizon.net

                      About Birdhouse LLC

Birdhouse LLC provides health care software solutions.  The Company
owns and operates a care management platform for families raising
children with autism.

Birdhouse LLC filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No.
18-15434) on April 23, 2018, listing under $1 million in both
assets and liabilities.  Edward M. Miller, Esq. at Miller & Miller,
LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


CAMBER ENERGY: CEO Azar Resigns Over 'Conflicts of Interest'
------------------------------------------------------------
Richard N. Azar II has resigned as chief executive officer of
Camber Energy, Inc.  Mr. Azar remains a member of the Board of
Directors of the Company.

The Company said that Mr. Azar's resignation was made partially in
connection with his status as a personal guarantor under the
Company's outstanding bank loan with International Bank of
Commerce, which, as previously reported by the Company, is
currently in default and perceived conflicts of interest in
connection therewith and in connection with the Company's
negotiation of a resolution thereto.  As of May 25, 2018, the
Company continues to discuss potential settlements and
modifications of the IBC debt and expects Mr. Schott to help
facilitate those negotiations moving forward.

Effective upon Mr. Azar's resignation, the Board of Directors of
the Company appointed Mr. Louis G. Schott as chief executive
officer of the Company.

Mr. Schott has over 24 years of legal and business experience with
20 years in the oil and gas industry, including a strong background
in restructuring, mergers and acquisitions, public company
regulations and requirements, title, energy finance, business
development, general negotiations and land.  Mr. Schott's recent
restructuring experience includes restructurings within and outside
of bankruptcy and both public, traded on the TSX and NYSE American,
and private entities.

Mr. Schott is currently an advisor to the Company (a position he
has held since December 2017) and is also an advisor to other
companies in various stages of growth.  Mr. Schott was recently the
interim chief executive officer of EnerJex Resources, Inc., a
Nevada corporation listed on the NYSE American, a position which he
held from February 2017 to March 2018.  As CEO, he led the
restructuring efforts, cost reductions and successful completion of
a merger between EnerJex and a privately held company.

In connection with Mr. Schott's appointment as chief executive
officer of the Company, the Company entered into an engagement
letter with Fides Energy LLC.  Pursuant to the letter, Fides agreed
to supply Mr. Schott's services to the Company as interim chief
executive officer and the Company agreed to pay Fides $25,000 per
month for the use of Mr. Schott's services.  The agreement can be
terminated by either party with 90 days' notice and terminates
automatically upon the death of Mr. Schott. Pursuant to the
agreement, Mr. Schott is also eligible to receive bonus
compensation at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

                      Separation Agreement

On May 25, 2018, Camber Energy entered into a Separation and
Release Agreement with Mr. Azar pursuant to which Mr. Azar agreed
to resign from the Company as chief executive officer effective May
25, 2018, and to release the Company from claims in connection with
various employment related statutes and laws and the Company agreed
to pay him a severance payment of $150,000, payable in three
installments of $50,000 each, on June 1, 2018, July 2, 2018 and
Aug. 1, 2018, and to grant him warrants to purchase 1,000,000
shares of the Company's common stock, at an exercise price of $0.39
per share, equal to the closing stock price of the Company's common
stock on the date the Severance Agreement was agreed to by the
parties, the exercise of which Warrants are subject to approval by
the NYSE American of the additional listing of the shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise thereof, and to the extent required by
the rules of the NYSE American, the approval of the shareholders of
the Company of the issuance of the shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise thereof.

                      About Camber Energy

Based in San Antonio, Texas, Camber Energy, Inc. (NYSE American:
CEI) -- http://www.camber.energy/-- is a growth-oriented,
independent oil and gas company engaged in the development of crude
oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids in the Hunton formation in
Central Oklahoma in addition to anticipated project development in
the San Andres formation in the Permian Basin.

Camber reported a net loss of $89.12 million on $5.30 million of
total net operating revenues for the year ended March 31, 2017,
compared to a net loss of $25.44 million on $968,146 of total net
operating revenues for the year ended March 31, 2016.  As of Dec.
31, 2017, Camber Energy had $18.18 million in total assets, $41.80
million in total liabilities and a total stockholders'
deficit of $23.61 million.

GBH CPAs, PC -- http://www.gbhcpas.com/-- in Houston, Texas,
issued a "going concern" opinion in its report on the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2017, citing that
the Company has incurred significant losses from operations and had
a working capital deficit at March 31, 2017.  These factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern, the auditors said.


CANBIOLA INC: Insufficient Capital Raise Going Concern Doubt
------------------------------------------------------------
Canbiola, Inc., filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, disclosing
a net income of $407,558 on $69,769 of total revenues for the three
months ended March 31, 2018, compared with a net income of $24,100
on $17,972 of total revenues for the same period in 2017.

At March 31, 2018, the Company had total assets of $1,511,405,
total liabilities of $931,479, all current, and $579,926 in total
stockholders' equity.

As of March 31, 2018, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of
$54,117 and a working capital surplus of $144,563.  For the three
months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had net gain of
$407,558 and $24,100, respectively.  These factors raise
substantial doubt as to the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.  The Company plans to improve its financial
condition by raising capital through sales of shares of its common
stock.  Also, the Company plans to expand its operation of CBD
products to increase its profitability.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://bit.ly/2sndZnW

                        About Canbiola, Inc.

Canbiola, Inc., provides document, project, marketing and sales
management systems to business clients through its website and
proprietary software and also have a division focusing on the
development and sale of products containing CBD.  The company was
formerly known as WRAPmail, Inc., and changed its name to Canbiola,
Inc., in May 2017.  Canbiola, Inc. was founded in 2005 and is based
in Hicksville, New York.


CANDLE CONNECTION: Hires Steinberg Law Firm PS as Attorney
----------------------------------------------------------
The Candle Connection, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Washington to hire
Charles R. Steinberg as attorney.

Mr. Steinberg will assist the Debtor in filing the necessary
pleadings to confirm a Chapter 11 plan for Debtor.

Mr. Steinberg will charge $250 per hour for his services.

Mr. Steinberg assures this Court that he does not hold or represent
an interest adverse to the estate that the he is a disinterested
person under 11 U.S.C. 104(14).

The counsel can be reached through:

     Charles R. Steinberg, Esq.
     STEINBERG LAW FIRM PS
     323 N. Miller
     Wenatchee, VA 98801
     Phone: 509 662-3202
     E-mail: steinbergc@me.com

                 About The Candle Connection

Family owned and operated, The Candle Connection was first
established in 1991. The original shop was located in the
historical Motteler Building and relocated to its present location
in 2006.  Along with outstanding customer service, the company
takes great pride in providing quality candles, 99% of which are
made in the USA with the rest from Germany and Denmark. Its diverse
selections and styles, along with a wide range of candle
accessories are unsurpassed.

The Candle Connection Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.
Wash. Case No. 18-01266) on May 1, 2018, listing under $1 million
in both assets and liabilities. Charles R Steinberg, Esq. at
STEINBERG LAW FIRM PS represents the Debtor.


CARTER FINANCIAL: Hires Aaronson Schantz Beiley, PA as Attorney
---------------------------------------------------------------
Carter Financial Group, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami
Division, to hire Tamara D. McKeown, Esq., and the law firm of
Aaronson Schantz Beiley P.A. as attorneys.

Professional services the attorneys will render are:

     a. give advice to the Debtor with respect to its powers and
duties as a Debtor in Possession and the continued management of
its financial affairs and business operations;

     b. advise the Debtor with respect to its responsibilities  in
complying with the U.S. Trustee's Operating Guidelines and
Reporting Requirements and the Rules of the Court;

     c. seek the Court's approval of Debtor's use of cash
collateral and all other matters necessary to the Debtor's Chapter
11 reorganization;

     d. prepare motions, pleadings orders, applications, adversary
proceedings, and other legal documents necessary in the
administration of the case;

     e. protect the interests of the Debtor in all matters pending
before the Court in this Chapter 11 case;

     f. represent the Debtor in the negotiations with its creditors
in conjunction with cash collateral issures, if any, the
preparation of a Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement,
and any other issues that may arise; and

     g. prepare a Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement,
any necessary amendments to the Plan and Disclosure Statement, and
to seek approval of the Disclosure Statement and confirmantion of
the Plan by the Court.

Tamara D. McKeown, Of Counsel to the law firm of Aaronson Schantz
Beiley P.A., attests that neither she nor her firm represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor or the Debtor's estate, and they are
disinterested persons as required by 11 U.S.C. Sec. 327(a).

The Chapter 11 retainer in this case, in the amount of $65,000
inclusive of costs and filing fees, was paid to Aaronson Schantz
Beiley P.A.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Tamara D. McKeown, Esq.
     Aaronson Schantz Beiley P.A.
     Miami Tower
     27th Floor, 100 S.E. 2nd St.
     Miami, FL 33131
     Phone: 786-594-3000
     Fax: 305-424-9336

                  About Carter Financial Group

Established in 2001, Carter Financial Group, LLC is a privately
held company in Bay Harbor Islands, Florida that provides financial
advisory services.

Carter Financial Group, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
S.D. Fla. Case no. 18-14454) April 16, 2018. The petition was
signed by Dr. Arnold P. Carter, managing director. The case is
assigned to Judge Laurel M Isicoff.

Tamara D. McKeown, Esq. at Aaronson Schantz Beiley P.A. represents
the Debtor as counsel.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimates $1 million to $10
million both in assets and liabilities.


CARTER FINANCIAL: Seeks Approval for Interim Use of Cash Collateral
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Carter Financial Group, LLC, seeks authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida for the
interim use of the cash collateral of secured creditor 6500 Pines
Holdings LLC.

The Debtor seeks authority to use cash collateral to continue to
make ordinary course payments in line with the proposed cash
collateral budget.  The Debtor proposes that any deviations of more
than 10% from a proposed line item in the Budget, barring any
unforeseen emergencies, will be paid only: (i) after obtaining the
prior agreement of 6500 Pines or, if no such agreement can be
obtained; (ii) upon Court approval of the proposed deviation.

The Debtor's primary asset is a multiple unit shopping center
located at 6500 Pines Boulevard in Pembroke Pines, Florida, which
the Debtor purchased on August 1, 2008. To purchase the Shopping
Center in 2008, the Debtor obtained a loan from TotalBank in the
principal amount of $2,450,000.00, and in conjunction with that
loan, executed a Promissory Note, a Florida Real Estate Mortgage,
an Assignment of Leases and Rents, and a Security Agreement. In
addition, the Debtor's owners and managing directors, Dr. Arnold
Carter and his wife, Sheri Carter, personally guaranteed the loan.
Thereafter, TotalBank sold the Loan and all related documents to
6500 Pines Holdings LLC, which filed an action in August 2017 to
enforce the Note, the Assignment of Rents and the Guarantees, and
to foreclose on the Shopping Center.

The Debtor is uncertain as to the actual market value of the
Shopping Center, but believes that the current market value is very
near the amount currently owed by Debtor to its secured creditor,
6500 Pines, pursuant to the final summary judgment entered on
February 12, 2018 in the state court foreclosure action, which is
$2,957,216.78.

Because the Debtor believes that that the Shopping Center's value
and the secured debt are approximately equal, then irrespective of
the fact the Debtor proposes to provide to 6500 Pines is as
follows:

     i. The Debtor will grant 6500 Pines a running replacement lien
on all rental income generated by the Debtor from and after the
Petition Date;

    ii. The Debtor will escrow 1/12 of all real estate taxes on a
going forward basis, which escrow will be available to pay
post-petition real estate taxes when due;

   iii. The Debtor will maintain comprehensive property and
liability insurance on the Shopping Center, as well as flood
insurance coverage at the required levels;

    iv. The Debtor will abide by the Budget;

     v. The Debtor will file its DIP Monthly Operating Reports on a
timely basis;

    vi. On reasonable notice, 6500 Pines may review the Debtor's
books and records during normal business hours and so as not to
disrupt normal business operations;

   vii. On reasonable notice, 6500 Pines may inspect the business
operations of the Debtor, but only in a manner so as not to disrupt
normal business operations;

  viii. In the event that there is any alleged default under this
Adequate Protection arrangement, 6500 Pines will provide the Debtor
and its counsel with written notice of default and allow the Debtor
a reasonable time to cure such default;

    ix. Additionally, irrespective of whether 6500 Pines is
under-secured or over-secured, the Debtor proposes in good faith to
make the following monthly payments to 6500 Pines to be applied to
the outstanding principal balance, which are based on the Debtor's
proposed Budget and anticipated monthly surplus from the Shopping
Center rental income:

         a. Monthly payments of $2,500, to be paid to 6500 Pines on
or by the last day of each month;

         b. In any given month, if Debtor's rental income from the
Shopping Center is insufficient to make the full Monthly Payment,
then the salary of Craig Carter, the son of Debtor's Managing
Directors and a member of Debtor, will be reduced by the amount
necessary to make the full Monthly Payment to 6500 Pines; and

         c. In addition to the Monthly Payments, the Debtor will
pay to 6500 Pines the net income remaining each month, if any,
after all budgeted expenses have been paid.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb18-14454-27.pdf

                  About Carter Financial Group

Established in 2001, Carter Financial Group, LLC, is a privately
held company in Bay Harbor Islands, Florida that provides financial
advisory services.

Carter Financial Group filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Case No. 18-14454) on April 16, 2018.  In the petition signed
by its Arnold P. Carter, managing director, the Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.  The case is
assigned to Judge Laurel M. Isicoff.  Tamara D McKeown, Esq., at
Aaronson Schantz Beiley P.A., is the Debtor's counsel.


CARTER FINANCIAL: Taps Gidney & Company, PA, CPAs as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------------------
Carter Financial Group, LLC, seeks authority from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida (Miami) to
hire  Gidney & Company, P.A., CPAs, as accountant.

Professional services the accountant will render are:

     a. prepare the Debtor's Chapter 11 monthly operating reports;

     b. calculate monthly sales tax due based on the Debtor's
rental income received, prepare and submit the Debtor's monthly
sales tax report to the Florida Department of Revenue;

     c. calculate payroll tax and withholdings due based on pauroll
to Debtor's sole employee and prepare and submit the Debtor's
monthly payroll tax report to the Internal Revenue Service;

     d. prepare Debtor's 2017 federal income tax return; and

     e. provide other general accounting and bookkeeping services.

Gidney will charge a monthly fee of $1,500 for the its services.
Gidney has agreed to accept ongoing monthly payments of $750, and
to defer the remaining $750 per month until the conclusion of the
Debtor's case.

Marc Gidney, CPA, principal of the firm, attests that neither he
nor the firms has any connection with any of the Debtor's creditors
or the estate, and that they are disinterested parties as required
by 11 U.S.C. Sec. 327(a).

The firm can be reached through:

     Marc Gidney, CPA
     Gidney & Company, P.A., CPAs
     300 Seventy-First Street, Suite 620
     Miami Beach, FL 33141
     Phone: (305) 866-6266
     Fax: (305) 866-6878

                               About Carter Financial Group, LLC

Established in 2001, Carter Financial Group, LLC is a privately
held company in Bay Harbor Islands, Florida that provides financial
advisory services.

Carter Financial Group, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-14454) on April 16, 2018, listing $1 million
to $10 million in both assets and liabilities. The petition was
signed by Dr. Arnold P. Carter, managing director. The Hon. Laurel
M Isicoff presides over the case.

Tamara D McKeown, Esq. at AARONSON SCHANTZ BEILEY P.A. represents
the Debtor as counsel.


CHOICE RADIO: Chapter 727 Claims Bar Date Set for Sept. 13
----------------------------------------------------------
Choice Radio Keys Corporation executed on May 14, 2018, executed an
Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors, whereby it assigned all of
its right, title and interest in and to all of its assets to Philip
Von Kahle, as Assignee, pursuant to 727, Florida Statutes.

Pursuant to Florida Statute 727.105, no proceeding may be commenced
against the Assignee except as provided in Chapter 727 and except
in the case of a consensual lienholder enforcing its rights in
collateral, there shall be no levy, execution, attachment, or the
like in respect of any judgment against assets of the estate in the
possession, custody or control of the Assignee.

To receive a dividend, interested parties must file a proof of
claim with the Assignee:

     Philip Von Kahle
     1883 Marina Mile Blvd., Suite 106
     Fort Lauderdale, FL 33315

on or before September 13, 2018.

The case is, In Re: CHOICE RADIO KEYS CORPORATION, Assignor, to:
PHILIP VON KAHLE, Assignee, pending before the Circuit Court of the
16th Judicial Circuit in and for Monroe County, Florida, Case No:
18-CA-000363-P.

Choice Radio has its principal place of business at 81681 Overseas
Highway, Islamorada, FL 33036.


CLINTON NURSERIES: Seeks July 2 Plan Exclusivity Period Extension
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Clinton Nurseries, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut to extend the
Exclusivity Periods for (a) filing a plan of reorganization through
and including July 2, 2018, and (b) obtaining acceptances thereto
through and including Aug. 30, 2018.

The Debtors claim that their businesses are relatively large and
complex, with three of the Debtors operating a sophisticated
wholesale nursery enterprise that both grows and maintains large
amounts of inventory (over ten million individual plants) and sells
such inventory to several of the country's largest retailers. In
addition to the size and complexity of the Debtors' businesses
themselves, the Debtors aver that the timing of the commencement of
these cases has added to the complexity of their early stages.

The Debtors contend that starting each February, the Debtors begin
shipping large quantities of products to their major customers for
the spring planting season. These shipments continue into the
summer and generate the majority of the Debtors' revenue for the
year. Accordingly, the Debtors and their management have invested
substantial time, energy and attention over the last several months
in business activities necessary to meet their major customers'
expectations during the Spring Delivery Season.

The Debtors tell the Court that these endeavors have been both
time-intensive and time-sensitive, which include securing
debtor-in-possession financing in order to fund certain costs of
the Spring Delivery Season (in light of many of the Debtors'
suppliers rescinding credit terms and instead requiring cash in
advance or on delivery), and negotiating agreements with numerous
suppliers and vendors in order to produce revenue as quickly and
efficiently as possible. The Debtors project that their shipments
to their major customers during the Spring Delivery Season will
generate more than $30 million in revenue.

In addition, the Debtors contend it was made clear to the Debtors
by Creditors early in these cases that creditors wanted to see how
the Debtors performed through the Spring Delivery Season before
creditors would be willing to engage in any substantive discussions
regarding a plan, and the Debtors have now made substantial
progress in demonstrating their ability to successfully perform. As
the Spring Delivery Season has progressed, the Debtors have
continued to pay their post-petition bills as they come due.
Earlier this week, the Debtors fully repaid their
debtor-in-possession financing in the amount of $1.335 million.

The Debtors mention that they have already prepared several pro
forma outlining the structures of potential Chapter 11 plans and
shared them with their major secured creditor, Bank of the West.
The Debtors have communicated extensively with Bank of the West and
answered questions posed by this lender in the Debtors' work thus
far on structuring a proposed Chapter 11 plan. The Debtors will
continue to negotiate with Bank of the West, and with other
parties-in-interest, over the month of June as the Debtors complete
their proposed plan.

The Debtors assert that they are not seeking an extension of
exclusivity in order to pressure creditors to submit to the
Debtors' reorganization demands. Rather, the Debtors are presently
communicating with major stakeholders, including the Bank of the
West and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, in an
effort to understand and consider their interests and concerns
prior to proposing a plan. Thus, termination of the exclusivity
periods at this time would interfere with the Debtors' efforts to
foster consensus and increase the likelihood of contested
confirmation proceedings or competing plans.

In the meantime, in order to keep these cases moving forward in an
orderly way, it is critical that the Debtors maintain their
exclusive rights to file a plan and solicit acceptances thereof.

                     About Clinton Nurseries

Founded in 1921, Clinton Nurseries, Inc., operates nurseries that
produce ornamental plants and other nursery products.  The company
grows trees, flowering shrubs, roses, ornamental grasses & ground
covers, perennials, annuals, herbs and vegetables. Clinton
Nurseries is based in Westbrook, Connecticut.

Clinton Nurseries and its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 17-31897) on Dec. 18, 2017.  David
Richards, president, signed the petition.  The cases are jointly
administered under Case No. 17-31897.

At the time of filing, Clinton Nurseries estimated its assets and
liabilities at $10 million to $50 million.

Judge James J. Tancredi presides over the cases.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors.


COLORADO NATIONAL: Sale of Equity Interests to Fund Plan Payments
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Colorado National Bancorp filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Colorado its latest plan to exit Chapter 11
protection.

Under the proposed plan of reorganization, creditors holding Class
1 unsecured claims will receive their pro rata share of the
distributions based upon the total amount of all allowed and
disputed Class 1 claims pending at the time of the distribution.
These claims will be paid interest accruing at the rate of 8% per
annum from the effective date.  The original Disclosure Statement
did not disclose estimated recovery percentgage for unsecured
creditors and the annual interest to be paid to general unsecured
creditors was 4% per annum.

No distribution will be made for any disputed Class 1 claim.  The
pro rata portion of the funds applicable to each disputed claim
will be withheld unless and until such claim is allowed.
Meanwhile, the pro rata portion of the funds withheld for disputed
Class 1 claims that are subsequently disallowed will be distributed
to creditors holding allowed unsecured claims.

Potential sources of payment to creditors include cash on hand,
personal property and recoveries from litigation.

Colorado National anticipates having approximately $8.9 million to
$9.1 million in cash on hand due to the closing of the sale of the
equity interests on or before August 31, 2018.  A portion of this
cash will be used for post-confirmation expenses and administrative
expense claims, according to the latest plan.

Copies of the first amended Chapter 11 plan of reorganization and
disclosure statement are available for free at:  

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob17-20315-225.pdf
     http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob17-20315-226.pdf

A copy of the original Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob17-20315-221.pdf

                  About Colorado National Bancorp

Colorado National Bancorp, formerly known as Community Bank
Partners Inc., operates as a bank holding company for Colorado
National Bank that provides banking products and services to
businesses and consumers in Colorado and surrounding states. It was
incorporated in 2009 and is based in Denver, Colorado.

Colorado National Bancorp sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 17-20315) on Nov. 8,
2017.  In the petition signed by CEO Scott D. Jackson, the Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Elizabeth E. Brown presides over the case.

The Debtor hired Jackson Kelly PLLC as its counsel, and Eide Bailly
LLP as its accountant.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Nov. 16, 2017. The Committee retained Markus
Williams Young & Zimmermann LLC as its bankruptcy counsel; Vining
Sparks Community Bank Advisory Group as financial advisor; and
Shapiro Bieging Barber Otteson LLP as special counsel.


COMMUNITY HEALTH: Extends Notes Early Tender Deadline to June 1
---------------------------------------------------------------
Community Health Systems, Inc.'s wholly owned subsidiary,
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., has amended certain terms of
its previously commenced offers to exchange (i) up to $1,925
million aggregate principal amount of its new 9.875%
Junior-Priority Secured Notes due 2023 in exchange for any and all
of its $1,925 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding
8.000% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2019, (ii) up to $1,200 million
aggregate principal amount of its new 8.125% Junior-Priority
Secured Notes due 2024 in exchange for any and all of its $1,200
million aggregate principal amount of outstanding 7.125% Senior
Unsecured Notes due 2020 and (iii) to the extent that less than all
of the outstanding 2019 Notes and 2020 Notes are tendered in the
Exchange Offers, up to an aggregate principal amount of 2024 Notes
equal to, when taken together with the New Notes issued in exchange
for the validly tendered and accepted 2019 Notes and 2020 Notes,
$3,125 million, in exchange for its outstanding 6.875% Senior
Unsecured Notes due 2022.

The amendment to the Exchange Offers extends the "Early Tender
Deadline" for each Exchange Offer.  All other terms, conditions and
applicable dates of the Exchange Offers remain unchanged.

The deadline for tendering Old Notes in order to receive the total
consideration of (i) $1,000 principal amount of 2023 Notes per
$1,000 principal amount of 2019 Notes tendered and accepted for
exchange, (ii) $1,000 principal amount of 2024 Notes per $1,000
principal amount of 2020 Notes tendered and accepted for exchange
and (iii) $750 principal amount of 2024 Notes per $1,000 principal
amount of 2022 Notes tendered and accepted for exchange has been
further extended from 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on Thursday,
May 24, 2018 to the "Expiration Date" for the Exchange Offers,
which is midnight, New York City time, at the end of the day on
Friday, June 1, 2018.  The tender withdrawal deadline has passed.
Accordingly, tenders of Old Notes may no longer be withdrawn.

The Exchange Offers remain subject to the conditions set forth in
the Offering Memorandum, dated May 4, 2018 and related Letter of
Transmittal, dated May 4, 2018, including the condition that at
least 90% of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the 2019
Notes are tendered in the Exchange Offers.  As of 5:00 p.m., New
York City time, on May 24, 2018, the Minimum Tender Amount
Condition has not been satisfied.  The Issuer reserves the right,
subject to applicable law, to terminate, withdraw or amend each
Exchange Offer at any time and from time to time, as described in
the Offering Memorandum.

Pursuant to the terms of the exchange agreement between the Issuer
and certain institutional investors that are holders of Old Notes,
any amendment or waiver of the Minimum Tender Amount Condition
requires prior written consent of such holders and there can be no
assurance such amendment or waiver will be granted.

Each series of New Notes will be guaranteed by the Company and
certain of its existing and future domestic subsidiaries that
guarantee the Issuer's outstanding senior secured credit
facilities, ABL facility and senior notes.  In addition, each
series of New Notes and related guarantees will be secured by (i)
second-priority liens on the collateral that secures on a
first-priority basis the Issuer's outstanding senior secured credit
facilities (subject to certain exceptions) and existing secured
notes and (ii) third-priority liens on the collateral that secures
on a first-priority basis the Issuer's outstanding ABL facility, in
each case subject to permitted liens described in the Offering
Memorandum.

The New Notes have not been registered under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended or any state securities laws.  The New Notes may
not be offered or sold in the United States or to any U.S. persons
except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not
subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
The Exchange Offers are being made, and each series of New Notes
are being offered and issued only (i) in the United States to
holders of Old Notes who the Issuer reasonably believes are
"qualified institutional buyers" (as defined in Rule 144A under the
Securities Act) and (ii) outside the United States to holders of
Old Notes who are (A) persons other than U.S. persons, within the
meaning of Regulation S under the Securities Act, and (B) "non-U.S.
qualified offerees".

The complete terms and conditions of the Exchange Offers are set
forth in the Offering Memorandum and related Letter of Transmittal.
Copies of the Offering Memorandum and Letter of Transmittal may be
obtained from Global Bondholder Services Corporation, the exchange
agent and information agent for the Exchange Offers, at (866)
470-3800 (toll free) or (212) 430-3774 (collect).

                    About Community Health

Community Health -- http://www.chs.net/-- is a publicly-traded
hospital company in the United States and an operator of general
acute care hospitals and outpatient facilities in communities
across the country.  Community Health was originally founded in
1986 and was reincorporated in 1996 as a Delaware corporation.  The
Company provides healthcare services through the hospitals that it
owns and operates and affiliated businesses in non-urban and
selected urban markets throughout the United States.  As of Dec.
31, 2017, the Company owned or leased 125 hospitals included in
continuing operations, with an aggregate of 20,850 licensed beds,
comprised of 123 general acute care hospitals and two stand-alone
rehabilitation or psychiatric hospitals.  Community Health is
headquartered in Franklin, Tennessee.

Community Health reported a net loss of $2.39 billion on $15.35
billion of net operating revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
compared to a net loss of $1.62 billion on $18.43 billion of net
operating revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March
31, 2018, Community Health had $17.31 billion in total assets,
$17.48 billion in total liabilities, $523 million in redeemable
non-controlling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries
and a total stockholders' deficit of $701 million.

                           *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on May 11, 2018, S&P Global Ratings lowered
its corporate credit rating on Brentwood, Tenn.-based hospital
operator Community Health Systems Inc. to 'CCC-' from 'CCC+' and
placed the rating on CreditWatch with negative implications.  The
CreditWatch negative status reflects the possible distressed
exchange of the unsecured notes due in 2022.

The TCR also reported on May 10, 2018, that Fitch Ratings
downgraded Community Health Systems, Inc.'s (CHS) Issuer Default
Rating (IDR) to 'C' from 'CCC' following the company's announcement
of an offer to exchange three series of senior unsecured notes due
2019, 2020 and 2022.


CONFIE SEGUROS: S&P Lowers ICR to 'CCC+', On Watch Developing
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it lowered its long-term issuer credit
rating on Confie Seguros Holdings II Co. (Confie) to 'CCC+' from
'B-' and placed them on CreditWatch with developing implications.

S&P said, "At the same time, we lowered our debt rating on the
company's first-lien facility to 'B-' from 'B' and on the
second-lien facility to 'CCC-' from 'CCC', reflecting the issuer
downgrade. We also affirmed the '2' recovery rating on the
first-lien facility, indicating our expectation for substantial
(70%-90%; rounded estimate: 75%) recovery in a payment default
scenario, and our '6' second-lien recovery rating, indicating
negligible (0%-10%; rounded estimate: 0%) recovery."

The downgrade primarily reflects the company's refinancing risk
from its significant debt maturities over the next six months and
one year, as well as continued covenant tightness and elevated
leverage.

The company's $262.5 million second-lien term loan is due in June
2019. However, if it is not addressed it will trigger a November
2018 springing maturity on the $665 first-lien term loan (which had
previously been due in 2020). Therefore, the company's maturities
are effectively in six months on its first-lien loan and one year
on its second-lien loan. S&P believes the company is actively
looking to alleviate this condition; however, the longer the
refinancing risk remains outstanding, the greater the risk and the
greater the possibility that the company will undertake a
transaction that we may view as a distressed exchange.

S&P said, "We view Confie's business risk position as weak,
reflecting its somewhat limited scale and scope, and increased
performance volatility over the past several years. The company has
grown and diversified substantially over the past several years.
However, as it has done this, it has also experienced notable
margin contraction from factors such as higher loss ratios in the
MGA business, integration inefficiencies, and increased costs
related to upgrading operational platforms. The company hired a new
CEO in late 2017 and implemented growth strategies such as hiring
new leadership to turnaround the MGA performance and leveraging
two-step sales process to take advantage of shared resources, which
we believe are starting to yield positive results.

"Our assessment of Confie's financial profile reflects our view
that the company is a financial sponsor-owned company and will
remain highly leveraged. Debt to EBITDA and fixed charge coverage
were at 8.8x and 1.4x respectively for the trailing twelve months
as of March 31, 2018. Given that the company has not yet released
audited year-end financials (within compliance, and expected by May
31, 2018), we do not have those available but expect these metrics
to be at similar levels. We expect modest improvement stemming from
improved MGA performance and operating efficiencies as well as new
growth initiative for 2018 with debt to EBITDA of 8.5 and fixed
charge coverage of 1.5.

"The CreditWatch Developing means that we will likely raise or
lower our ratings on the company in the next three to six months
based on its ability to refinance its upcoming maturities
successfully, as well as address its covenant tightness. If Confie
addresses its upcoming maturities and covenant tightness in a
timely manner such that we revise our assessment of its liquidity
to adequate, this could lead to an upgrade. On the other hand, we
could lower our ratings at any time between now and the November
2018 first-lien maturity on Confie if we believe the company is not
successfully addressing its refinancing risk. Additionally, we
could lower our ratings if we believe there is an increased
likelihood that Confie pursued a distressed exchange of its debt
(which could be an "amend an extend," if we believe lenders are
receiving less than originally promised), which we would view as a
selective default."


CONTRERAS TRUCKING: Wants Interim Access to Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------------
Contreras Trucking, Inc., asks from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of California to allow interim use of the
cash collateral pursuant to the proposed budget.

The proposed cash collateral budget shows total monthly expenses in
the approximate amount of $256,402.  As shown on the proposed
budget the use of the cash collateral will allow for the continual
running of Debtor's business operations for the period between May
2018 and July 2018.

The Debtor admits that this Chapter 11 filing was necessitated by
the collection tactics being used to collect a money judgment
against Debtor. The Debtor's bank accounts were levied leaving
Debtor without the funds to continue the business and to pay all
creditors in a timely manner. The Debtor will use the Chapter 11
process to consolidate debts in order to continue his business,
which, but for the debt, is profitable.

The Debtor believes that these entities may assert a claim in cash
collateral: Bank of the West; Crossroads Equipment Lease; Financial
Pacific Leasing; US Bank; Royal Bank America Leasing; and Luxury
Auto Leasing.

The Debtor seeks to negotiate repayment of the loans held with the
entities with an interest in the cash collateral. The Debtor
proposes to use replacement collateral to continue operating the
trucking business where in turn the business continues to generate
income. The income is the replacement collateral that will be used
to make payments to the creditors once a repayment plan is
negotiated.

The Debtor will also negotiate with the lenders in order to reduce
the interest rates and/or payments, and adjust the arrears so that
Debtor may become current on payments.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/casb18-01569-41.pdf

                    About Contreras Trucking

Contreras Trucking, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No. 18-01569) on March 20,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $1 million.  Judge
Christopher B. Latham presides over the case.  The Debtor tapped
Contreras Law Firm as its legal counsel.


DENNIS JOHNSON II: Summary Judgment Bid on Receivership Nixed
-------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Robert C. Chambers grants Plaintiff's motion for
leave to file partial summary judgment on receivership but denies
Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on receivership in
the case captioned THOMAS H. FLUHARTY, Trustee of the Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Estates of Dennis Ray Johnson, II (No. 3:16-BK-30227);
DJWV2, LLC (No. 3:16-BK-30062); Southern Marine Services, LLC (No.
3:16-BK-30063); Southern Marine Terminal, LLC (No. 3:17-BK-30064);
Redbud Dock, LLC (No. 3:16-BK-30398); Green Coal, LLC (No.
3:16-BK-30399); Appalachian Mining & Reclamation, LLC (No.
3:16-BK-30400) Producer's Land, LLC (3:16-BK-30401); Producer's
Coal, Inc. (3:16-BK-30402); Joint Venture Development, LLC (No.
3:16-BK-30403), Plaintiffs, v. PEOPLES BANK, NA, PEOPLES INSURANCE
AGENCY, LLC, GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, and
ZACHARY B. BURKONS, Defendants, Civil Action No. 3:17-4220
(S.D.W.V.).

Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to File Partial Summary Judgment
on Receivership and asserts that the Court should permit him to
file for partial summary judgment prior to the completion of
discovery because the record and evidence on the issue of Defendant
Zachary B. Burkons's compliance with the West Virginia statute on
receivership is clear at this point.

Substantively, in the Summary Judgment Motion, Plaintiff requests
summary judgment on the discrete issue of whether Defendant Burkons
was actually a receiver under West Virginia law. Plaintiff contends
that because neither Defendant Burkons, nor any other party, posted
a receiver bond, as required under the statute, Defendant Burkons
never held the right to act as a court-appointed receiver.

Because, as explained in the Court's previous order filed on April
24, 2018, the law is clear with regard to this Court's ability to
inspect the sufficiency of Defendant Burkons's receivership
appointment, the Court finds that it is appropriate to rule on
Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motion. Therefore, the Court grants
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Partial Summary Judgment on
Receivership but denies Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment on Receivership.

A copy of the Court's Order dated May 1, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2kgLt3p from Leagle.com.

Thomas H. Fluharty, Trustee of the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Estates of
& Dennis Ray Johnson, II, Plaintiffs, represented by Joe M. Supple,
SUPPLE LAW OFFICE.

DJWV2, LLC, Southern Marine Services, LLC, Southern Marine
Terminal, LLC, Redbud Dock, LLC, Green Coal, LLC, Appalachian
Mining & Reclamation, LLC, Producer's Land, LLC, Producer's Coal,
Inc. & Joint Venture Development, LLC, Plaintiffs, represented by
Joe M. Supple, SUPPLE LAW OFFICE & Martin P. Sheehan , SHEEHAN &
NUGENT.

Peoples Bank, NA, Defendant, represented by Arch W. Riley, Jr. --
ariley@bernsteinlaw.com -- BERNSTEIN-BURKLEY, John J. Richardson --
jrichardson@bernsteinlaw.com -- BERNSTEIN-BURKLEY & Kirk B. Burkley
-- kburkley@bernsteinlaw.com -- BERNSTEIN-BURKLEY.

Peoples Insurance Agency, LLC, Defendant, represented by Lawrence
E. Morhous, BREWSTER MORHOUS CAMERON ROBERT C. CHAMBERS, Lisa M.
Zaring -- lzaring@mrjlaw.com -- MONTGOMERY RENNIE & JONSON, pro hac
vice & Ralph E. Burnham -- rburnham@mrjlaw.com -- MONTGOMERY RENNIE
& JONSON.

Great American Insurance Company of New York, Defendant,
represented by Carol P. Smith -- csmith@fbtlaw.com -- FROST BROWN
TODD & Christopher S. Burnside -- cburnside@fbtlaw.com -- FROST
BROWN TODD, pro hac vice.

                  About Dennis Ray Johnson

Dennis Ray Johnson, II, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.
W.Va. Case No. 16-30227) on May 9, 2016, and was represented by
Christopher S. Smith, Esq., at Hoyer, Hoyer & Smith, PLLC.  In
January 2017, Mr. Johnson tapped Lewis Glasser Casey & Rollins PLLC
as new counsel.

Mr. Johnson is a businessman with ownership interests in at least
10 entities. He operates various rental real estate entities and
coal associated operations. Mr. Johnson is a member of each of the
following debtor companies -- Appalachian Mining and Reclamation,
LLC, DJWV1, LLC, DJWV2, LLC, Elkview Reclamation and Processing,
LLC, Green Coal, LLC, Joint Venture Development, LLC, Little
Kentucky Elk, LLC, Moussie Processing, LLC, Producer's Coal, Inc.,
Producer's Land, LLC, Redbud Dock, LLC, Southern Marine Services,
LLC, Southern Marine Terminal, LLC, and The Silo Golf Course, LLC
-- and has filed a motion asking the Bankruptcy Court to jointly
administer the bankruptcy cases. Mr. Johnson is also a guarantor of
the debt for most of the companies.

Mr. Johnson operated as a debtor-in-possession until Thomas
Fluharty was appointed Chapter 11 trustee on November 7, 2016.
Counsel for the Trustee is Joe M. Supple, Esq., at Supple Law
Office PLLC, in Point Pleasant, West Virginia.


DPW HOLDINGS: Partners with Restauranteurs to Acquire I.AM
----------------------------------------------------------
DPW Holdings, Inc. has partnered with perennial restauranteurs to
acquire IAM, Inc., the owner of the Prep Kitchen brand restaurants
located in the greater San Diego area.  DPW's new partners, Deborah
and David Krause, will operate IAM, Inc. through their hospitality
management company and oversee the management of the Prep Kitchen
branded restaurants.  Deborah and David Krause are experienced
professionals with over 50 years of service managing both niche and
named brand locations.  They intend to expand the Prep Kitchen
brand throughout California starting in 2018 as well as expand the
portfolio of restaurant brands owned by IAM, Inc.

On May 23, 2018, Digital Power Lending, LLC, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of DPW Holdings, Inc., entered into and closed a
securities purchase agreement with I.AM INC., David J. Krause and
Deborah J. Krause (the I.AM Stockholders").  Pursuant to the
Purchase Agreement, I.AM sold to DPL, 981 shares of common stock
for a purchase price of $981, representing, upon the closing, 98.1%
of I.AM's outstanding common stock.

As disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, I.AM owes DPL $1,715,363 in outstanding principal,
pursuant to a loan and security agreement, between I.AM and DPL,
that I.AM used to acquire the restaurants.  The Purchase Agreement
provides that, as I.AM repays the outstanding loan to DPL in
accordance with the loan agreement, DPL will on a pro rata basis
transfer shares of common stock of I.AM to David J. Krause, up to
an aggregate of 471 shares.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the parties agreed to negotiate
in good faith to enter into a management agreement between I.AM and
a separate management company formed and operated by the I.AM
Stockholders, by June 29, 2018.  In the event the management
agreement is not entered into by June 29, 2018, then on July 2,
2018, DPL will return to I.AM for cancellation the shares of common
stock of I.AM purchased by DPL, and I.AM will sell such shares to
the I.AM Stockholders for a purchase price of $1.00 per share.

"We are very excited about partnering with Deborah and David Krause
who have many years of experience successfully managing and growing
hospitality businesses.  Deborah and David are amazing and we look
forward to providing additional support as their company grows.  We
are confident they will expand their presence in the hospitality
sector and bring value to the DPW shareholders," said Milton "Todd"
Ault, III, the CEO and chairman of DPW Holdings, Inc.

"With Mr. Ault's years of experience in the hospitality sector, DPW
Holdings was a natural fit to partner with.  We look forward to
working with Mr. Ault and his team to build IAM, Inc., expand the
Prep Kitchen brand and create and develop other brands over the
next decade," stated Deborah Krause, operating partner of IAM,
Inc.

                      About DPW Holdings

Headquartered in Fremont, California, DPW Holdings, Inc.,  formerly
known as Digital Power Corp. -- http://www.DPWHoldings.com/-- is a
diversified holding company that, through its wholly owned
subsidiary, Coolisys Technologies, Inc., is dedicated to providing
technology-based solutions where innovation is the main driver for
mission-critical applications and lifesaving services.  Coolisys'
growth strategy targets core markets that are characterized by
"high barriers to entry" and include specialized products and
services not likely to be commoditized.  Coolisys through its
portfolio companies develops and manufactures cutting-edge resonant
switching power topologies, specialized complex high-frequency
radio frequency (RF) and microwave detector-log video amplifiers,
very high-frequency filters and naval power conversion and
distribution equipment.  Coolisys services the defense, aerospace,
medical and industrial sectors and manages four entities including
Digital Power Corporation, www.DigiPwr.com, a leading manufacturer
based in Northern California, 1-877-634-0982; Digital Power Limited
dba Gresham Power Ltd., www.GreshamPower.com, a manufacturer based
in Salisbury, UK.; Microphase Corporation, www.MicroPhase.com with
its headquarters in Shelton, CT 1- 203-866-8000; and Power-Plus
Technical Distributors, www.Power-Plus.com, a wholesale distributor
based in Sonora, CA 1-800-963-0066.  Coolisys operate s the branded
division, Super Crypto Power, www.SuperCryptoPower.com.

DPW Holdings incurred a net loss of $10.89 million in 2017
following a net loss of $1.12 million in 2016.  As of Dec. 31,
2017, DPW Holdings had $30.51 million in total assets, $11.72
million in total liabilities and $18.79 million in total
stockholders' equity.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Marcum
LLP, in New York, on the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017, includes an explanatory paragraph stating
that the Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has
incurred significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to
meet its obligations and sustain its operations.  These conditions
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.


EBH TOPCO: June 6 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, Acting United States Trustee for Region 3, will hold an
organizational meeting on June 6, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. in the
bankruptcy case of EBH Topco, LLC et al.

The meeting will be held at:

         Sheraton Suites
         422 Delaware Avenue
         Wilmington, DE 19801

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it
represents.

      About Elements Behavioral Health/EBH Topco

Long Beach, California-based EBH Topco, LLC along with its
subsidiaries -- http://www.elementsbehavioralhealth.com/-- are
providers of behavioral health services and residential drug and
alcohol addiction treatment.  The Elements Behavioral Health(R)
family of programs offers comprehensive, innovative treatment for
substance abuse, sexual addiction, trauma, eating disorders, and
other mental health disorders.  

EBH Topco, LLC (Lead Case), Elements Behavioral Health, Inc., and
certain of its affiliates sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
on May 23, 2018 (Bankr. D. Del., Case No. 18-11214). The petition
was signed by Martin McGahan, chief restructuring officer.

The Debtors listed $50 million to $100,000 million in assets and
under $100 million to $500 million in liabilities.

Hon. Brendan Linehan Shannon presides over the Debtors' cases.

Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Shanti M. Katona, Esq., Stephen J.
Astringer, Esq., and Jeremy R. Johnson of Polsinelli PC serve as
counsel to the Debtors.  Alvarez & Marsal LLC acts as restructuring
advisor to the Debtors, Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. as investment
banker, and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc. as notice and claims
agent.


ECLIPSE BERRY: Hires Lefoldt & Co., P.A. as Accountant
------------------------------------------------------
Eclipse Berry Farms, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of
California, Los Angeles Division, to hire Lefoldt & Co., P.A.,
Certified Public Accountants as their accountant to wind-up and
audit the Debtors' 401(k) Plan.

Specifically, Lefoldt will audit the financial statements of the
Debtors' 401(k) plan for the years ending December 31, 2014, 2015,
2016, and 2017.

Lefoldt's hourly rates are:

     M. Larry Lefoldt, CPA                         $225.00
     Judy W. Shannon, CPA                          $225.00
     Drew Drummond - Incharge Staff Accountant     $110.00
     Gloria Blackledge - Administrative Assistant  $85.00

Judy W. Shannon, CPA, shareholder of Lefoldt & Co., P.A., attests
that neither she, Lefoldt, nor any of its employees hold or
represent an interest adverse to the Debtors.  in the
above-captioned cases, and Lefoldt is a “disinterested person”
as such term is defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The accountant can be reached through:

     Judy W. Shannon, CPA
     Lefoldt & Co., P.A., Certified Public Accountants
     690 Towne Center Boulevard
     Post Office Box 2848
     Ridgeland, MS 39158
     Phone:(601) 956-2374

                   About Eclipse Berry Farms

Founded in 1999, Eclipse Berry Farms operates farms that produce
berry products.  The company is based in Los Angeles, California.

Eclipse Berry Farms and its affiliates Harvest Moon Strawberry
Farms, LLC, and Rosalyn Farms, LLC, filed Chapter 11 petitions
(C.D. Cal. Case Nos. 18-10443, 18-10453 and 18-10464, respectively)
on Jan. 16, 2018.  In the petition signed by CRO Robert Marcus,
Eclipse Berry Farms estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets
and less than $100 million in debt.

Hon. Barry Russell is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Kevin H. Morse, Esq., at Saul Ewing Arnstein &
Lehr LLP as bankruptcy counsel; Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith,
LLP as local counsel; McCarron & Diess as special PACA counsel; and
Murray Wise Capital LLC as financial advisor.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Feb. 9, 2018.


ECOFLORA INC: Chapter 727 Claims Bar Date Set for Aug. 28
---------------------------------------------------------
Ecoflora, Inc., filed on April 30, 2018, a petition commencing an
Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors proceeding, pursuant to
Chapter 727 of the Florida Statutes, to Michael Phelan as
Assignee.

Pursuant to Florida Statutes, Section 727.105, no proceeding may be
commenced against the Assignee except as provided in Chapter 727
and except in the case of a secured creditor enforcing its rights
and collateral under Chapter 679, there shall be no levy,
execution, attachment, or the like in the respect of any judgment
against assets of the estate, other than real property, in the
possession, custody, or control of the Assignee.

To receive any dividend in this proceeding, interested parties must
file a proof of claim with the Assignee:

     Michael Phelan
     Michael Moecker & Associates, Inc.
     1883 Marina Mile Blvd., Suite 106
     Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33315

on or before August 28, 2018.

The case is, In re: ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS OF:
ECOFLORA, INC., Assignor, TO: MICHAEL PHELAN, Assignee, Case No.
2018-014086-CA-01, pending before the Circuit Court of the 11th
Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida.

Ecoflora, Inc. has its principal place of business at P.O. Box
522427 Miami, FL, 33152.


ERIN ENERGY: Hires Okin Adams LLP as Counsel
--------------------------------------------
Erin Energy Corporation, Erin Petroleum Nigeria Limited, Erin
Energy Kenya Limited, and Erin Energy Limited seek authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Houston Division, to hire Okin Adams LLP as counsel for the
Debtors.

Services to be rendered by Okin Adams are:

     a) advise the Debtors with respect to their rights, duties and
powers in this case;

     b) assist and advise the Debtors in their consultations
relative to the administration of this case;

     c) assist the Debtors in analyzing the claims of the creditors
and in negotiating with such creditors;

     d) assist the Debtors in the analysis of and negotiations with
any third party concerning matters relating to, among other things,
the terms of plans of reorganization;

     e) represent the Debtors at all hearings and other
proceedings;

     f) review and analyze all applications, orders, statements of
operations and schedules filed with the Court and advise the
Debtors as to their propriety;

     g) assist the Debtors in preparing pleadings and applications
as may be necessary in furtherance of the Debtors' interests and
objectives; and

     h) perform such other legal services as may be required and
are deemed to be in the interests of the Debtors in accordance with
the Debtors' powers and duties as set forth in the Bankruptcy Code.


Matthew S. Okin, partner with the firm Okin Adams LLP, attests that
Okin Adams is a "disinterested person" as that term is defined in
Sec. 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Okin Adams' current rates are:

     Matthew S. Okin, Partner        $575 per hour
     David L. Curry, Jr., Partner    $450 per hour
     John Thomas Oldham, Of Counsel  $300 per hour
     Ryan A. O'Connor, Associate     $275 per hour

The counsel can be reached through:

     Matthew S. Okin, Esq.
     David L. Curry, Jr.
     John Thomas Oldham
     Ryan A. O'Connor
     1113 Vine St., Suite 201
     Houston, TX 77002
     Tel: 713-228-4100
     Fax: 888-865-2118
     E-mail: mokin@okinadams.com
             dcurry@okinadams.com
             joldham@okinadams.com
             roconnor@okinadams.com

                        About Erin Energy

Houston, Texas-based Erin Energy Corporation (NYSE American:ERN)
(JSE:ERN) -- http://www.erinenergy.com/-- is an independent oil
and gas exploration and production company focused on energy
resources in sub-Saharan Africa. Its asset portfolio consists of
five licenses across three countries covering an area of 6,100
square kilometers (~1.5 million acres), including current
production and other exploration projects offshore Nigeria, as well
as exploration licenses offshore Ghana and The Gambia.

As of Dec. 31, 2017, Erin Energy had $251.1 million in total
assets, $613.9 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficiency of $362.8 million.

Erin Energy Corporation and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
18-32106) on April 25, 2018.  CEO Femi Ayoade signed the
petitions.

As of March 31, 2018, the Debtors disclosed $247,535,000 in assets
and $628,724,000 in liabilities.  

Judge Marvin Isgur presides over the cases.

The Debtors tapped Okin & Adams LLP as their legal counsel, and The
Loev Law Firm, PC as their securities law counsel.


ERIN ENERGY: Hires Stout Risius Ross LLC as Financial Advisor
-------------------------------------------------------------
Erin Energy Corporation, Erin Petroleum Nigeria Limited, Erin
Energy Kenya Limited, and Erin Energy Limited seek authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Houston Division, to hire Stout Risius Ross, LLC, as financial
advisor to the Debtors.

Stout's duties and responsibilities are:

     a. assist in the negotiations with potential lenders, current
creditors and other parties of interest related to providing funds,
and negotiation of a plan of reorganization;

     b. assist with the preparation of cash forecasts, including
creation and roll-forward of 13-week cash budget;

     c. review of periodic Budget to Actual variance analysis;

     d. valuation of underlying collateral if needed for use of
cash collateral, adequate protection or other court pleadings;

     e. analysis of planned disbursements and proposed vendor
payments;

     f. assist in the identification of unencumbered assets;

     g. identification of short and long term liquidity
enhancements;

     h. assist with the preparation of schedules, analyses and
projections to support a plan of reorganization;

     i. analysis of assumption and rejection issues regarding
executory contracts and
leases;

     j. assist with preparation of monthly operating reports,
Statements of Financial Affairs and Schedules;

     k. assist with the claims resolution procedures, including,
but not limited to, analyses of creditors' claims by type and
entity;

     l. assistance with preparation of court-required reports;

     m. as needed, provide assistance with preparation of
pleadings; and

     n. render other tasks necessary to carry out Stout's fiduciary
duty to the Company.

Loretta R. Cross, managing director at Stout Risius Ross, LLC,
attests that her firm does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtors and it is a disinterested person as defined by 11
U.S.C. Sec. 101(14).

The firm's hourly rates range from $75 to $650.  Loretta R. Cross
will lead the engagement.  Mrs. Cross's current hourly rate is
$560.

The firm can be reached through:

     Loretta R. Cross
     Stout Risius Ross, LLC
     1000 Main Street, Suite 3200
     Houston, TX 77002
     Phone: 713-225-9580
     Fax: 713-225-9588
     Email: lcross@stoutadvisory.com

                       About Erin Energy

Houston, Texas-based Erin Energy Corporation (NYSE American:ERN)
(JSE:ERN) -- http://www.erinenergy.com/-- is an independent oil
and gas exploration and production company focused on energy
resources in sub-Saharan Africa. Its asset portfolio consists of
five licenses across three countries covering an area of 6,100
square kilometers (~1.5 million acres), including current
production and other exploration projects offshore Nigeria, as well
as exploration licenses offshore Ghana and The Gambia.

As of Dec. 31, 2017, Erin Energy had $251.12 million in total
assets, $613.90 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficiency of $362.77 million.

Erin Energy Corporation and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Lead Case No.
18-32106) on April 25, 2018.  Femi Ayoade, chief executive officer,
signed the petitions.

As of March 31, 2018, the Debtors disclosed $247,535,000 in assets
and $628,724,000 in liabilities.  

Judge Marvin Isgur presides over the cases.

The Debtors tapped Okin & Adams LLP as their legal counsel, and The
Loev Law Firm, PC as their securities law counsel.


ETERON INC: Taps Michigan Business Advisors as Business Appraiser
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Eteron, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Michigan to hire William H. Malek, managing
member of Michigan Business Advisors, LLC, as  business appraiser.

The arrangement for compensation is a flat fee of $3,500 inclusive
of appraisal services and related expenses to Michigan Business
Advisors, LLC for a comprehensive business valuation report to
prepare a due diligence package to
negotiate and sell the business.

William H. Malek, managing member of Michigan Business Advisors,
LLC, attests that he and the other professionals employed by
Michigan Business Advisors, LLC are disinterested parties as
defined by 11 USC Sec. 101(14).

The firm can be reached through:

     William H. Malek
     Michigan Business Advisors LLC
     10850 E Traverse Hwy
     Traverse City, MI 49684
     Phone: (231) 933-9925
     Email: wmalek@mibusinessadvisors.com

                         About Eteron Inc.

Eteron, Inc., is a privately-held company in Farmington, Michigan
engaged in paint, coating, and adhesive  manufacturing.  It is
affiliated with Sakura, LLC, which sought bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 18-45163) on April 9, 2018.

Eteron sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 18-45161) on April 9, 2018.  In the
petition signed by John C. Kim, II, president, the Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Phillip
J. Shefferly presides over the case.


FAMILY PHARMACY: Taps Integrity Pharmacy Consultants as Broker
--------------------------------------------------------------
Family Pharmacy, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates seek approval from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri to
hire Integrity Pharmacy Consultants LLC as pharmacy broker to
assist with the sale of the assets to maximize sale value at a
commission rate of 3% of the Cash Portion of the Purchase Price.

Sean Duffy of Integrity Pharmacy Consultants LLC attests that
Integrity is a disinterested party, does not hold an interest
adverse to these estates and understands that there is a continuing
duty to disclose any such adverse interest.

The firm can be reached through:

     Sean Duffy
     Integrity Pharmacy Consultants LLC
     2925 E Riggs Rd #8 PMB 116.
     Chandler, AZ 85249
     Phone: 833-735-5797
     Email: sean@integritypharmacyconsultants.com

                   About Family Pharmacy Inc.

Family Pharmacy, Inc., and its affiliates Family Pharmacy of
Missouri LLC, Family Pharmacy of Strafford Inc., Family Property
Management LLC, and HealthTAC Logistics LLC own and operate a group
of independently-owned retail pharmacy stores in Southwestern
Missouri.  The debtors operate 20 retail pharmacy locations, two
long term-care pharmacy locations and one specialty pharmacy
location under the "Family Pharmacy".  Family Pharmacy has been
operating continuously since 1977.  The Debtors are headquartered
in Ozark, Missouri.

Family Pharmacy, Inc., et al., sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Mo. Lead Case No. 18-60521) on
April 30, 2018.  In the petitions signed by Lynn Morris, president,
the Debtors estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and
liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.  Judge Cynthia A. Norton
presides over the cases.


FLABEG SOLAR US: Bankruptcy Court Junks Suit vs D. Busby, AIDL
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Carlota M. Bohm granted the Defendant's motion and
dismissed the adversary proceeding captioned FLABEG SOLAR US
CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. DAVID BUSBY, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Defendants, Adv. Proc. No. 15-2149-CMB (Bankr.
W.D. Pa.).

The adversary proceeding was commenced by Debtor Flabeg Solar US
Corporation on July 30, 2015. Within Debtor's Amended Adversary
Complaint, Debtor alleges that Defendants David Busby and American
International Development, LLC took possession of Debtor's property
without payment. The Amended Complaint seeks recovery on the basis
of unjust enrichment and turnover. The Defendants' filed a Motion
to Dismiss Amended Adversary Complaint.

Prior to the filing of the bankruptcy case, the Debtor manufactured
two coat primary mirror assemblies used for commercial solar power
generation. As of the commencement of the case, the Debtor had
14,881 of these mirrors in stock and ready for shipment at its
business facilities, which the Debtor leased from The Buncher
Company.

As agreed upon by the Debtor, Buncher, UniCredit Luxembourg, S.A.
(the Debtor's primary secured creditor), and approved by the Court,
the Debtor was to vacate the business premises by Jan. 15, 2014
(the "vacation date") and remove its personalty from the premises
by that date as well. Stipulated and Agreed Order entered Nov. 7,
2013. Prior to the vacation date, the Debtor was provided the
opportunity to conduct an auction of its personal property,
equipment, and inventory located at the business premises.

To state a claim for unjust enrichment, a plaintiff must plead
facts in support of the following elements: "benefits conferred on
defendant by plaintiff, appreciation of such benefits by defendant,
and acceptance and retention of such benefits under such
circumstances that it would be inequitable for defendant to retain
the benefit without payment of value." In other words, one party
must receive the benefit at the expense of the other. Accordingly,
in this case, the estate must have maintained an interest in the
Mirrors when Defendants obtained them in order for the Defendants
to have been unjustly enriched at the expense of the estate.
Likewise, an "essential element of a turnover action is that the
property sought . . . is, in fact, property of the estate."

Thus, the Debtor's success in this adversary proceeding is
dependent upon whether the Mirrors remained property of the estate
following the vacation date when the Defendants obtained
possession. In order to demonstrate an entitlement to recovery,
Debtor contends that the Mirrors remained property of the
bankruptcy estate at the time the Defendants took the Mirrors
without payment. To the contrary, Defendants contend that the
Mirrors were not property of the Debtor's estate at the time of the
transfer to Defendants and thus Debtor is unable to state a claim
for unjust enrichment or turnover. Here, the issue is resolved by
the terms of the Vacation Order.

Upon assessing the Vacation Order, the Court holds that the Debtor
failed to plead facts, and in fact cannot plead facts based upon
the record of the case and the terms of the Vacation Order,
establishing that Defendants were unjustly enriched at the expense
of the estate or that the estate is entitled to turnover of the
Mirrors or their value.

The bankruptcy case is in re: FLABEG SOLAR US CORPORATION, Chapter
11, Debtor, Bankruptcy No. 13-21415-CMB (Bankr. W.D. Pa.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated May 3,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2rZToFU from Leagle.com.

FLABEG Solar US Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Robert O.
Lampl, Robert O Lampl Law Office.

David Busby, Defendant, pro se.

American International Development, LLC, Defendant, pro se.

                 About Flabeg Solar US Corporation

FLABEG Solar US Corporation, based in Clinton, PA, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 13-23353) on August 9, 2013.
The Hon. Carlota M. Bohm presides over the case. Robert O. Lampl,
Esq., serves as bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated up to $50,000 in assets and
$50,000,001 to $100,000,000 in liabilities. The petition was signed
by William Otto, president.


FLINT GROUP: $31MM Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off
---------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Flint Group SA is a
borrower traded in the secondary market at 95 cents-on-the-dollar
during the week ended Friday, May 18, 2018, according to data
compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing. This represents a
decrease of 1.04 percentage points from the previous week. Flint
Group pays 300 basis points above LIBOR to borrow under the $31
million facility. The bank loan matures on September 7, 2021.
Moody's rates the loan 'B3' and Standard & Poor's gave a 'B-'
rating to the loan. The loan is one of the biggest gainers and
losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans with five or more
bids in secondary trading for the week ended Friday, May 18.

Flint Group S.A. manufactures and distributes flexography, gravure,
sheetfed, UV offset, news print, heatset, letterpress, metal
decorating, UV screen, consumables, and colorant products for
printing and packaging, converting, and colorant industries. The
company was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in Luxembourg with
operations in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Australia, New
Zealand, India, and the Pacific Rim, as well as North, Central, and
South America. It also has an ink mixing station in Moscow, Russian
Federation. Flint Group S.A. is a former subsidiary of BASF SE.


FLINT GROUP: $794MM Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off
----------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Flint Group SA is a
borrower traded in the secondary market at 95 cents-on-the-dollar
during the week ended Friday, May 18, 2018, according to data
compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing. This represents a
decrease of 1.04 percentage points from the previous week. Flint
Group pays 300 basis points above LIBOR to borrow under the $794
million facility. The bank loan matures on May 19, 2021. Moody's
and Standard & Poor's have no rating for the loan. The loan is one
of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, May 18.

Flint Group S.A. manufactures and distributes flexography, gravure,
sheetfed, UV offset, news print, heatset, letterpress, metal
decorating, UV screen, consumables, and colorant products for
printing and packaging, converting, and colorant industries. The
company was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in Luxembourg with
operations in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Australia, New
Zealand, India, and the Pacific Rim, as well as North, Central, and
South America. It also has an ink mixing station in Moscow, Russian
Federation. Flint Group S.A. is a former subsidiary of BASF SE.


GREEN DOOR: Seeks Court Approval to Use Cash Collateral
-------------------------------------------------------
Way To Grow, Inc., and its debtor-affiliate Green Door Hydro and
Solar Electric, Inc., seek approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Colorado to use cash collateral.

The Debtors revealed that Corey Inniss is the only secured creditor
who claims a lien on inventory and accounts.  The claim of Inniss
is based on a promissory note dated 2016 in the amount of
$20,500,000.

According to the Debtor, the cash collateral is to be derived from
the sale of inventory.  This is mainly because its inventory
remains stable in amount. Balance for the current account
receivable is around $1,453,712, with cash in bank accounts
amounting to $1,162,268.

The Debtor revealed that it will use the case collateral to pay the
necessary operating expenses and will use it on an interim basis
until the Court gives final approval.

As adequate protection, the Debtors will provide secured creditors
with a postpetition lien on all postpetition inventory, accounts
receivable, and income derived from the operation of the business
and assets, to the extent that the use of the cash results in a
decrease in the value of secured creditor's interest in the
collateral pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 361(2).  All replacement
liens will hold the same relative priority to assets as did the
prepetition liens.

The Debtors said it will use cash collateral in accordance with a
Budget projecting a 30-day total expense of $2,575,758.

A full-text copy of Way To Grow's Motion is available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/WayToGrow_CashCollateral_Motion.pdf

A similar motion was filed by Green Door Hydro and Solar Electric
and can be viewed at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/GreenDoor_CashCollateral_Motion.pdf

                     About Way To Grow, Inc.

Way To Grow, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates Green Door Hydro and
Solar Electric, Inc., and Pure Agrobusiness, Inc., sell equipment
and related supplies for indoor hydroponic gardening. Pure
Agrobusiness, Inc., is the holding company for the other two.  Way
To Grow, Inc., consists of 7 retail outlets located in Colorado
while also having internet sales presence.  Green Door Hydro and
Solar Electric, Inc., manages a sales facility in California.

Way To Grow and Green Door Hydro and Solar Electric filed for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Col. Case Nos. 18-14330, 18-14333
& 18-14334) on May 18, 2018. The petitions were signed by CEO
Richard Byrd disclosing estimated assets and liabilities between
$500 million and $1 billion.


HARVEST VISION: Foreclosure Auction Set for July 31
---------------------------------------------------
The real property of Harvest Vision Church, Inc., an Alaska
nonprofit corporation, will be sold at public auction by the
trustee, Alyeska Title Guaranty Agency, Inc., in favor of the
beneficiary, Roseanne M. Leydon, on July 31, 2018, at 10:30 o'clock
a.m. at the main front door of the Boney Courthouse, 303 K. Street,
Anchorage, Alaska 99501.

The Property has a street address of 4950 Taku Drive, Anchorage
Alaska 99508.

Harvest Vision has been declared in breach of the obligation
consisting of the failure to satisfy an indebtedness which is
secured by a Deed of Trust.  There is owing and unpaid on the Deed
of Trust Note and Deed of Trust as of April 18, 2018:

     Principal:    $218,231.13, plus late charges,
     Interest    $27,308.72
     Late Charges $450.00
     Title Search $942.00
     Attorney Fees $1,400.00

In addition, interest from August 19, 2017, is accruing at 8% per
annum and together with all sums properly advanced or expended
under the terms of the deed of trust.

All sums are due and owing as of October 1, 2017.

The trustee has the right to postpone the sale and set reasonable
rules and conditions for the conduct of the sale.   The sale shall
be made to the highest bidder.  The beneficiary may bid at the
sale.  Questions regarding this matter should be directed to:

     David D. Clark, Esq.
     Law Offices of David D. Clark
     737 W 5th Ave., Ste. 203
     Anchorage, AK 99503
     Telephone: 907-272-7989


HEATH OIL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Heath Oil Company, Inc.
           dba Heath Automotive
           dba Heath Automotive Tullahoma
        P. O. Box 492
        Winchester, TN 37398-0492

Business Description: Heath Oil Company, Inc. is a merchant
                      wholesaler of petroleum and petroleum
                      products based in Winchester, Tennessee.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 28, 2018

Case No.: 18-12323

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Tennessee (Winchester)

Debtor's Counsel: Paul E. Jennings, Esq.
                  PAUL E. JENNINGS LAW OFFICE
                  805 S. Church Street, Ste. 3
                  Murfreesboro, TN 37130
                  Tel: 615- 895-7200
                  Fax: (615) 895-7294
                  E-mail: paulejennings@bellsouth.net

Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Steven M. Heath, president.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/tneb18-12323_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/tneb18-12323.pdf


HI-LO FARMS: Taps Coldwell Banker Alfonso Realty as Estate Broker
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hi-Lo Farms, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi, Southern Division, to
employ Carie Cole and Coldwell Banker Alfonso Realty, Inc., as real
estate professionals.

The professional services to be rendered by Ms. Cole and Coldwell
are listing and marketing real property of the Debtor in Monroe
County, Mississippi, at 5% commission rate.

Carrie Cole, broker at Coldwell Banker Alfonso Realty, attests that
she represents no adverse interest to the Debtor's estate and that
she is a disinterested person under 11 U.S.C. 101(14).

The broker can be reached through:

     Carrie Cole
     Coldwell Banker Alfonso Realty, Inc.
     625 Courthouse Road
     Gulfport, MS 39507
     Phone: 228-287-1000
     Fax: 228-287-1001

                       About Hi-Lo Farms

Hi-Lo Farms, Inc., is a privately-held company in Gulfport,
Mississippi, which is engaged in farming.  It sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Miss. Case No.
17-51239) on June 23, 2017.  In the petition signed by Martha L.
Cole, president, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  Judge Katharine M. Samson presides over
the case.  Patrick Sheehan at Sheehan Law Firm, PLLC, serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


HOTEL INVESTORS: Auction of Springhill Lot Moved to June 5
----------------------------------------------------------
The foreclosure auction of the real property of Hotel Investors
Mobile Airport, LLC, has been rescheduled to June 5, 2018.  The
public sale will be held in front of the main entrance to the
Courthouse in Mobile County, Alabama during the legal hours of
sale.

The auction was originally set for May 2.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, Hotel Investors
Mobile Airport has been declared in default of payment of debt
secured by a Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Leases, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing dated March 10, 2016, executed by
Hotel Investors Mobile Airport, as Mortgagor, in favor of SSC
Mobile, LLC as Mortgagee, in the original principal amount of
$8,200,000.

The real property consists of Lot 1, Springhill Commercial Park,
Unit Four, Phase One, in Mobile County, Alabama.

Pursuant to Ala. Code Sec. 7-9A-604, because the Mortgage covers
both real and personal property, Hotel Investors will sell all
personal property collateral described in and encumbered by the
Mortgage at the same time and during the same sale.

SSC makes no representation or warranty as to the physical
condition of the real estate and/or any improvements thereon or the
personal property collateral described in the Mortgage.

The property will be sold on an "as is" basis, subject to any
unpaid taxes, all reservations and restrictions contained in prior
deeds and all other matters of record, including restrictive
covenants and easements for road rights of way, utilities or rights
of ingress and egress.  The property will be sold without
representation, warranty or recourse, express or implied, as to
title, condition, use and/or enjoyment of the property, and will be
sold subject to the statutory right of redemption.  The sale is
subject to being postponed or cancelled.

SSC Mobile is represented by:

     Christopher H. Ezell, Esq.
     JONES WALKER LLP
     11 North Water Street Suite 1200
     Mobile, AL 36602
     Tel: (251) 432-1414


ILLINI KIDS: Wants to Use Cash Collateral through July 31
---------------------------------------------------------
Illini Kids Development Company, LLC, asks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California to use cash
collateral from May 1, 2018 through July 31, 2018.

The cash collateral consists of rents collected from its real
property located at 8100-8128 Madison Avenue, Fair Oaks,
California.

The Debtor told the Court that creditor Private Mortgage Fund, LLC,
has first deed of trust when it comes to security interest in the
rear property. Meanwhile The Chen Trust/Scott Weiss holds the
second deed of trust.

The Debtor disclosed that the cash collateral will be used to pay
for expenses incurred in connection with its real properly and
operation of the business for the period April 4, 2018 through July
31, 2018.

A full-text copy of the Motion can be viewed at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/IlliniKids_CashCollateral_Motion.pdf

               About Illini Kids Development Company

Illini Kids Development Company, LLC, filed as a single asset real
estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Illini Kids Development Company sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 18-22027) on
April 4, 2018. In the petition signed by Kenneth Cruz, managing
member, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Christopher D.
Jaime presides over the case.


INLAND CONTAINER: Chapter 727 Claims Bar Date Set for Sept. 13
--------------------------------------------------------------
Inland Container Acquisition Company, LLC, filed on May 16, 2018, a
petition commencing an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors
proceeding, pursuant to Chapter 727, Florida Statutes, to Mark C.
Healy, as Assignee.

The Assignee may be reached at:

     Mark C. Healy
     MICHAEL MOECKER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
     1883 Marina Mile Blvd., Suite 106
     Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33315

Pursuant to Florida Statutes 727.105, no proceeding may be
commenced against the Assignee except as provided in Chapter 727
and except in the case of a secured creditor enforcing its rights
and collateral under Chapter 679, there shall be no levy,
execution, attachment, or the like in the respect of any judgment
against assets of the estate, other than real property, in the
possession, custody, or control of the Assignee.

To receive any dividend in this proceeding, interested parties must
file a proof of claim with the Assignee on or before Thursday,
September 13, 2018.

The case is, In Re: Inland Container Acquisition Company, LLC,
Assignor, To: Mark Healy of Michael Moecker & Associates, Inc.,
Assignee, CASE NO. 16-2018-CA-003160, pending before the Circuit
Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit in and for Duval County,
Florida, Division CV-A.

Inland Container has its principal place of business at 9485
Regency Square Boulevard, Suite 104, Jacksonville, Florida 32225.


INPIXON: Signs Standstill Agreement with Lender
-----------------------------------------------
Inpixon and Chicago Venture Partners, L.P. (the "Lender") entered
into a standstill agreement on May 23, 2018, pursuant to which the
Lender has agreed to delay, for a period of nine months following
the Purchase Price Date, its right to make redemptions under the
Convertible Promissory Note dated Nov. 17, 2017 in the principal
amount of $1,745,000.  In exchange for the Lender's agreement and
for reimbursement of the fees incurred by the Lender in having the
Standstill Agreement prepared, the Company paid the Lender $68,000
upon execution of the Standstill Agreement.  A full-text copy of
the Standstill Agreement is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/N4YWAk

                         About Inpixon

Headquartered in Palo Alto, California, Inpixon is a technology
company that helps to secure, digitize and optimize any premises
with Indoor Positioning Analytics (IPA) for businesses and
governments in the connected world.  Inpixon Indoor Positioning
Analytics is based on radically new sensor technology that finds
all accessible cellular, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and RFID signals
anonymously.  Paired with a high-performance, data analytics
platform, this technology delivers visibility, security and
business intelligence on any commercial or government premises
world-wide.  Inpixon's products, infrastructure solutions and
professional services group help customers take advantage of
mobile, big data, analytics and the Internet of Things (IoT).

Inpixon reported a net loss of $35.03 million on $45.13 million of
total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net
loss of $27.50 million on $53.16 million of total revenues for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, Inpixon had $25.15
million in total assets, $26.26 million in total liabilities and a
total stockholders' deficit of $1.11 million.

Marcum LLP, in New York, the Company's auditor since 2012, issued a
"going concern" opinion in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, citing that the
Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has incurred
significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to meet its
obligations and sustain its operations.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


INT'L MANUFACTURING: Suit vs Battle Creek Dismissed with Prejudice
------------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. approved the stipulation
entered into by Plaintiff International Manufacturing Group and
Defendant Battle Creek State Bank to dismiss the case captioned
BEVERLY N. McFARLAND, Chapter 11 Trustee for International
Manufacturing Group, Inc., Plaintiff, v. BATTLE CREEK STATE BANK,
Defendant, Dist. Ct. Case No. 2:18-cv-00289-MCE (E.D. Cal.).

Thus, the Plaintiff's complaint against Battle Creek is dismissed
with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, including
attorneys' fees.

A copy of the Court's Order dated May 3, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2J1gDKa from Leagle.com.

Beverly N. McFarland, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Daniel
Sullivan --csullivan@diamondmccarthy.com -- Diamond McCarthy LLP &
Matthew S. Sepuya -- msepuya@diamondmccarthy.com -- Diamond
McCarthy LLP.

Wings Insurance, Inc., Defendant, pro se.

International Manufacturing Group Inc., Debtor, represented by Marc
A. Caraska, Marc A. Caraska, A. Law Corporation.

              About International Manufacturing

Deepal Wannakuwatte, the mastermind of a $150 million Ponzi scheme,
put himself and his company, International Manufacturing Group
Inc., into Chapter 11 after he pleaded guilty to one count of wire
fraud and agreed to a 20-year prison sentence.  The bankruptcy
filing was part of his plea bargain with federal prosecutors.  Mr.
Wannakuwatte is the former owner of the Sacramento Capitols tennis
team.

Mr. Wannakuwatte initiated his personal Chapter 11 case on May 30,
2014.  Hank Spacone was appointed as trustee for Wannakuwatte's
Chapter 11 estate.  Betsy Kathryn Wannakuwatte and Sarah Kathryn
Wannakuwatte also have pending Chapter 7 cases.

Mr. Wannakuwatte also submitted a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
for IMG on May 30, 2014 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 14-25820) in
Sacramento.  The case is assigned to Judge Robert S. Bardwil.  The
Debtor tapped Marc A. Caraska, in Sacramento, as counsel.

In June 2014, Beverly N. McFarland was appointed as Chapter 11
trustee for IMG. She tapped Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby &
Pascuzzi LLP as her bankruptcy counsel; Diamond McCarthy LLP as her
special litigation counsel; Gabrielson & Company as accountant; and
Karen Rushing as bookkeeper outside the ordinary course of
business.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 7 appointed a three-member unsecured
creditors panel in IMG's case comprising of Byron Younger, Janine
Jones, and Steve Whitesides.


IO AT TECH: Lawsuit vs Hartford Remanded to State Court
-------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Tony M. Davis remands the adversary proceeding
captioned IO AT TECH RIDGE, LP., Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD FIRE
INSURANCE COMPANY, ET. AL., Defendants, Adv. No. 18-01015-TMD
(Bankr. W.D. Tex.) to the state court from where it came.

For several years, IO tried to build a large apartment complex on
property that IO owned in North Austin. For financing, IO obtained
a HUD-endorsed loan from Berkadia Commercial Mortgage. To build the
complex, IO contracted with Defendant ICI Construction. When the
complex was only partially constructed, IO and ICI had a falling
out, and IO terminated the contract.

IO then sued ICI in state court, and later amended the complaint to
include claims against Defendant Harford Fire Insurance, which had
issued a performance bond. Defendant Power Design, a subcontractor,
intervened in the suit despite IO's objection. Power Design has
removed the state court lawsuit under 28 U.S.C. section 1452, which
allows removal of most types of civil actions to bankruptcy court.

IO asked the Court to remand the suit to state court on the grounds
of mandatory abstention and permissive abstention or equitable
remand.

Here, the Court finds that not all the elements of mandatory
abstention are met, however, a court may still use its discretion
to abstain from a matter.

Most courts in the Fifth Circuit determine whether the doctrines of
permissive abstention or equitable remand should be applied by
evaluating 14 factors. The factors are:

   (1) Effect or lack thereof on the efficient administration of
the estate if the court abstains or remands;

   (2) Extent to which state law issue predominate over bankruptcy
issues;

   (3) Difficult or unsettled nature of the applicable law;

   (4) Presence of related proceeding started in state court or
other non-bankruptcy proceeding;

   (5) Jurisdictional basis, if any, other than § 1334;

   (6) Degree of relatedness or remoteness of lawsuit to main
bankruptcy case;

   (7) The substance rather than the form of an asserted core
proceeding;

   (8) The feasibility of severing state law claims from core
bankruptcy matters to allow judgment to be entered in state court
with enforcement left to the bankruptcy court;

   (9) The burden of the bankruptcy court's docket;

  (10) The likelihood that the removal involves forum shopping by
one of the parties;

  (11) The existence of a right to a jury trial;

  (12) The presence in the proceeding of non-debtor parties;

  (13) Comity; and

  (14) Possibility of prejudice to other parties in the action.

The Court, however, did not get their answer after analyzing the
factors. The Court, thus, sought anchorage by simply reading the
statute. In reading the statute, it is apparent that Congress
believed that state court matters generally belong in state court
unless a strong federal interest suggests otherwise. This suit is a
state court matter as there is no independent basis for federal
jurisdiction.

The bankruptcy case is in re: IO AT TECH RIDGE LP., Chapter 11,
Debtor, Case No. 17-11540-TMD (Bankr. W.D. Tex.)

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated May 3,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2keKZLd from Leagle.com.

IO at Tech Ridge, LP, Plaintiff, represented by Jeffrey S. Chapman
-- jeff@chapmanfirmtx.com -- The Chapman Firm, William L. Erwin  --
william@chapmanfirmtx.com -- The Chapman Firm, Neal Meinzer --
Neal.Meinzer@wallerlaw.com. -- Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP &
Eric J. Taube  -- Eric.taube@wallerlaw.com -- Waller Lansden Dortch
& Davis, LLP.

Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Richard
A. Fulton -- rfulton@coatsrose.com -- Coats Rose P.C., Keith A.
Langley , Langley LLP, Nicholas J. Nieto -- nnieto@coatsrose.com --
Coats Rose P.C. & Barry S. Rabon -- brabon@coatsrose.com -- Coats
Rose P.C.

ICI Construction, Inc., Defendant, represented by Stephanie Hayes
Cook -- shayes@andrewsmyers.com -- Andrews Myers, P.C., Andrew S.
Harris  -- aharris@andrewsmyers.com -- Andrews Myers, P.C., T. Josh
Judd -- JJudd@andrewsmyers.com -- Andrews Myers, P.C., Timothy C.
Ross -- tross@andrewsmyers.com -- Andrews Myers, P.C. & Clayton S
Utkov -- Cutkov@andrewsmyers.com -- Andrews Myers, P.C.

Level Line Construction Management, Defendant, represented by Tommy
H. Murphy, Law Office of Tom Murphy.

Cattles Construction, Inc., Defendant, represented by Richard E.
Greenblum.

Copper Link Construction, Inc., Defendant, represented by Adam
Pugh, Slater Pugh, Ltd. LLP.

                  About IO at Tech Ridge

IO at Tech Ridge, LP, is a limited partnership that owns a
partially constructed apartment project in Austin, Travis County,
Texas.  IO at Tech Ridge filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 17-11540) on Dec. 11, 2017.  The Debtor
hired Nicholas B. Bangos, P.A., as counsel.


JONES ENERGY: Dismisses PricewaterhouseCoopers as Auditors
----------------------------------------------------------
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Jones Energy,
Inc., has dismissed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's
independent registered public accounting firm.  The Audit Committee
is conducting a competitive process to select, and form a long-term
relationship with, a new independent registered public accounting
firm.

The audit reports of PwC on the consolidated financial statements
of the Company for each of the two most recent fiscal years ended
Dec. 31, 2017 and Dec. 31, 2016 did not contain an adverse opinion
or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to
uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

The Company said that during its two most recent fiscal years ended
Dec. 31, 2017 and Dec. 31, 2016 and during the subsequent interim
period through May 22, 2018, (i) there were no disagreements with
PwC on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial
statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures that, if not
resolved to PwC's satisfaction, would have caused PwC to make
reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in their
reports on the consolidated financial statements for such years and
(ii) there were no "reportable events" as defined in Item
304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

                        About Jones Energy

Austin, Texas-based Jones Energy, Inc. --
http://www.jonesenergy.com/-- is an independent oil and natural
gas company engaged in the development and acquisition of oil and
natural gas properties in the Anadarko basin of Oklahoma and
Texas.

Jones Energy reported a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $109.41 million in 2017, a net loss attributable to
common shareholders of $45.22 million in 2016, and a net loss
attributable to common shareholders of $2.38 million in 2015.  As
of March 31, 2018, Jones Energy had $1.94 billion in total assets,
$1.29 billion in total liabilities, $89.66 million in series A
preferred stock, and $558.35 million in total stockholders'
equity.

                         NYSE Noncompliance

On March 23, 2018, the New York Stock Exchange notified the Company
that it was non-compliant with certain continued listing standards
because the price of the Company's Class A common stock over a
period of 30 consecutive trading days had fallen below $1.00 per
share, which is the minimum average closing price per share
required to maintain a listing on the NYSE.  The Company now has a
six-month cure period to regain compliance.  Within the cure
period, the Company may regain compliance if the closing price per
share is $1.00 or higher on the last trading day of a given month,
or at the end of the cure period.  Additionally, the 30-day average
closing price per share must also be $1.00 or higher.  The Company
previously received a similar notice on Dec. 26, 2017, but regained
compliance on Feb. 1, 2018.

                           *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on April 16, 2018, Fitch Ratings downgraded
the Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of Jones Energy Holdings,
LLC (JEH) and its parent, Jones Energy Inc. (NYSE: JONE) to 'CCC-'
from 'CCC'.


JWCCC LLC: Hires Vida Law Firm PLLC as Attorney
-----------------------------------------------
JWCCC, LLC, a/k/a Marshall Grain Company, seeks authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas (Ft.
Worth) to hire Behrooz P. Vida, Esq. and The Vida Law Firm, PLLC,
as attorneys.

Professional services the firm is to render are:

     a. give the Debtor legal advice with respect to their powers
and duties as Debtor-in-Possession in the management of their
affairs;

     b. prepare on behalf of the Debtor the necessary applications,
orders, answers, reports, and other legal papers;

     c. perform all other legal services for the Debtor which may
be necessary in the proceeding.

Vida Law's standard hourly rates are:

     Behrooz P. Vida    $350
     Legal Assistants   $125

Behrooz P. Vida, Esq., of the The Vida Law Firm, PLLC, attests that
she does not presently hold any interest adverse to the Debtor or
its estates and is a disinterested person within the meaning of
Sec. 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Behrooz P. Vida, Esq.
     THE VIDA LAW FIRM, PLLC
     3000 Central Drive
     Bedford, TX 76021
     Tel: (817)358-9977
     Fax: 817-358-9988
     Email: filings@vidalawfirm.com

                        About JWCCC, LLC
                 a/k/a Marshall Grain Company

JWCCC, LLC, a/k/a Marshall Grain Company  --
http://www.marshallgrain.com/-- operates an organic garden center
and a pet supply store in North Texas.  The Company has been
serving the needs of organic gardeners, urban farmers, modern
homesteaders, and pet lovers since 1946.  Through its Landscape
Services Division, Marshall Grain offers design and installation
projects, drainage and irrigation services, hardscaping, and
organic maintenance services.  Currently the division serves
Grapevine and its surrounding cities.  

Marshall Grain Company filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Case No. 18-41853) on May 8, 2018, listing $100,000 to
$500,000 in estimated assets and $1 million to $10 million in
estimated liabilities.  The petition was signed by James W.
Connelley, managing member.

Behrooz P. Vida, Esq., at The Vida Law Firm, PLLC, is the Debtor's
counsel.


K&S UTILITY: Taps Sheils Winnubst PC as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------
K&S Utility Contractors, Inc., seeks authority from United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas) to
hire Sheils Winnubst, P.C. as counsel.

Legal services SWPC will provide are:

     (a) render legal advice with respect to the powers and duties
of a debtor in Chapter 11;

     (b) negotiate, prepare and file a plan or reorganization and
disclosure statement and otherwise promote the financial
rehabilitation of the Debtor;

     (c) take all necessary action to protect and preserve the
estate of the Debtor, including the prosecution of actions on the
Debtor's behalf, the defense of any actions commenced against the
Debtor, negotiations concerning all
litigation in which the Debtor is or becomes involved, and the
evaluation of and objection to claims filed against the estate;

     (d) prepare, on behalf of the Debtor, all necessary
applications, motions, answers, orders, reports and papers in
connection with the administration of the estate herein, and appear
on behalf of the Debtor at all Court hearings in connection with
the Debtor’s case;

     (e) render legal advice and perform general legal services in
connection with the foregoing; and

     (f) perform all other necessary legal services in connection
with this Chapter 11 case, and it is necessary for the Debtor, as
Debtor-in-Possession, to employ SWPC for such professional
services.

SWPC's standard hourly rates are:
  
           T. Craig Sheils         $375
           Mark D. Winnubst        $325
           Stephanie L. Wooley     $275
           Latrice E. Andrews      $250
           Kimberly Quirk          $195

T. Craig Sheils, member of Sheils Winnubst, P.C., attests that he
represents no interest adverse to Debtor-in-Possession herein, or
the estate in the matters upon which he is to be engaged, and he
believes that Sheils Winnubst, P.C., is disinterested as that term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Thomas Craig Sheils, Esq.
     SHEILS WINNUBST P.C.
     1100 Atrium II
     1701 N. Collins Blvd.
     Richardson, TX 75080-1339
     Tel: 972-644-8181
     Email: craig@sheilswinnubst.com

                  About K&S Utility Contractors

K&S Utility Contractors, Inc., is a water main contractor based in
Seagoville, Texas.

K&S Utility Contractors filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Case No. 18-31636) on May 14, 2018, listing $500,000 to $1
million in estimated assets and $1 million to $10 million in
estimated liabilities.  The petition was signed by Glenda Koller,
president.  The case is assigned to Judge Harlin DeWayne Hale.

Thomas Craig Sheils, Esq., at SHEILS WINNUBST P.C., is the Debtor's
counsel.


LC STAR INVESTMENT: Foreclosure Auction Set for June 21
-------------------------------------------------------
The real property of LC Star Investment Co., will be sold at public
auction to the highest and best bidder for cash on June 21, 2018,
at 10:00 a.m., inside the main front entrance of the Boney
Courthouse located at 303 K Street, Anchorage, AK 99501.

Hanmi Bank, as secured creditor, will foreclose on and sell the
Collateral.  According to a foreclosure notice, LC Star has
breached numerous of its obligations under a Deed of Trust and
Promissory Note with the bank, including failure to make payment
when due.

As of March 2, 2018, the principal balance was $3,080,099.28,
interest owing was is $57,699.11, and late fees are $4,571.40, for
a total of $3,174,275.93.  Per diem interest accrues at the rate of
$548.51.  In addition, interest continues to accrue, plus legal
costs and fees and all sums expended by the Beneficiary and Trustee
under the Deed of Trust.

LC Star, by and through its President Chung Ki Choe, as Trustor,
executed a Deed of Trust in favor of Hanmi Bank as Beneficiary, and
to United Title Guaranty as Trustee, duly recorded on May 31, 2012,
at Serial No. 2012-029673-0, in the Anchorage Recording District,
Third Judicial District, State of Alaska.  The Deed of Trust was
given to secure a Promissory Note in the principal amount of
$3,440,000.00, plus interest, costs, and fees.

The property encumbered by the Deed of Trust is commonly known as
4610 Spenard Road, Anchorage, AK 99517.

To determine the current amount required to pay off the loan
contact:

     Kris Y. Min
     Hanmi Bank
     Tel: (213) 368-3206 or
     kris.min@hanmi.com


LG WOOD VALLEY: Property Sale Proceeds to Pay Secured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
LG Wood Valley, LLC, filed a proposed plan of reorganization and
disclosure statement dated May 8, 2018.

Class 1 under the plan consists of the secured claims of Acores,
Inc. and the County of Sonoma Tax Collector. The Debtor will pay
the entire amount contractually due with interest in one payment,
due within 12 months after confirmation. In the interim, Debtor
will make monthly interest only adequate protection payments in the
amount of $5,700 per month, starting May of 2018. To the extent
arrears are determined to be other than as shown above, that
portion of the claim will be paid in full upon the sale or
refinance of the subject collateral. Creditors in these classes
will retain their interest in the collateral until paid in full.

The Debtor will sell or refinance the collateral -- Sonoma,
California property -- by June 2019, paying secured creditors from
the proceeds of the sale or refinance. The debtor will file a
motion for approval of any such sale or refinance on 28 days notice
to lien holders. Unless the court orders otherwise, a lienholder
whose lien is not in bona fide dispute may credit bid the amount of
its lien at the sale.

The Debtor will make the following monthly payments pending the
closing of the sale, $5,700 to Acores, Inc., due the 15th day of
the month, starting May 2018. The creditors may not repossess or
dispose of their collateral so long as Debtor is not in material
default under the Plan. These secured claims are impaired and are
entitled to vote on confirmation of the Plan.

The debtor has no unsecured claimants.

If the Plan is confirmed, the payments promised in the Plan
constitute new contractual obligations that replace the Debtor’s
pre-confirmation debts. Creditors may not seize their collateral or
enforce their pre-confirmation debts so long as Debtor performs all
obligations under the Plan. If the Debtor defaults in performing
Plan obligations, any creditor can file a motion to have the case
dismissed or converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation, or enforce their
non-bankruptcy rights. The Debtor will be discharged from all
pre-confirmation debts (with certain exceptions) if Debtor makes
all Plan payments.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb18-10075-33.pdf

                    About LG Wood Valley

LG Wood Valley, LLC, is a single asset real state company (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)) whose principal place of
business is located at 2979 Wood Valley Road, Sonoma, California.

LG Wood Valley sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Calif. Case No. 18-10075) on Feb. 7, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Randy Rene King, president of managing
member, the Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million
and liabilities of less than $1 million.  Judge Charles Novack
presides over the case.  The Law Offices of Craig A. Burnett is the
Debtor's legal counsel.


LINCOLN ENTERPRISE: Seeks 60-Day Exclusive Filing Period Extension
------------------------------------------------------------------
Lincoln Enterprise, LLC, requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida extend the Exclusivity Period and the
Acceptance Period for a period of 60 days.

The Debtor is the tenant with respect to a 99 year lease for
commercial property located on Lincoln Road in Miami Beach,
Florida. On January 29, 2018, the Debtor filed a Motion to
Determine Cure Amounts in addition to Motion to Assume Lease.
Pursuant to the Court's instructions at a preliminary hearing on
the Assumption Motion, the landlord under the Lease, Herbert
Bookstein, and the Debtor filed cross-motions for summary judgment
on the limited issue of whether rent had increased under the Lease
in 2016 pursuant to the rent revaluation provisions detailed in
Article IV of the Lease.

On April 9, 2018, the Court conducted a hearing and issued an oral
ruling determining the report of rent revaluation recorded by
Bookstein did not demonstrate an agreement as to the fair market
value of the subject land and that, as of the date hereof, rent had
not increased under the Lease. But Bookstein has filed a Motion for
Reconsideration.

Both the Motion for Reconsideration and the Assumption Motion are
currently set for hearing on June 7, 2018.

Moreover, the Debtor has served a subpoena for the deposition of an
appraiser referenced in the Motion for Reconsideration and a
Request for Production of Documents upon Bookstein. On the other
hand, Bookstein has indicated an intention to seek a protective
order and to contest all discovery related to the Motion for
Reconsideration. The parties are currently scheduling a discovery
conference related to this dispute pursuant to the rules applicable
to this judicial division.

While this case is not large, the Debtor asserts that the issues,
however, are somewhat complex as the Court has had to interpret
both the Lease (which was drafted in 1946) and Bookstein's now
repeated attempts to manufacture agreement amongst appraisers who
are $14 million dollars apart in their valuations.

                    About Lincoln Enterprise

Lincoln Enterprise, LLC, is a privately held Florida limited
liability company whose principal assets are located at 226 Lincoln
Road Miami Beach, FL 33139.  The company is equally owned by Joseph
Cohen and LED Trust, LLC.  Lincoln Enterprise filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-10939) on Jan. 25, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Haim Yehezkel, managing member of LED Trust,
the Debtor estimated $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  Judge Laurel M Isicoff presides the case.
Michael S. Hoffman, Esq., at Hoffman, Larin & Agnetti, P.A., is the
Debtor's counsel.

On February 16, 2018, the United States Trustee for Region 3
appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors. No trustee
or examiner has been appointed in these Chapter 11 Cases.


LOVE GRACE: 5th Amended Plan Outline OK'd; June 25 Plan Hearing
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Douglas D. Dodd of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Louisiana approved Love Grace Holdings, Inc.'s fifth
amended disclosure statement dated April 25, 2018.

The court will hold a hearing on confirmation of the debtor's Fifth
Amended Chapter 11 Plan dated April 25, 2018 on June 25, 2018 at
10:00 a.m.

Ballots accepting or rejecting the amended plan must be delivered
no later than June 15, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. Objections to the amended
plan and supporting memoranda must be filed and served no later
than June 18, 2018 at 5:00 p.m.

The Amended Disclosure Statement dated April 25 disclosed that the
estimate percentage recovery to general unsecured creditors is 28%
to 30%.  Each holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim will be
paid quarterly in Cash its pro-rata share of certain amounts
pursuant to the following schedule over six (6) years: (a) year one
is a distribution of $25,000.00 per quarter; (b) year two is a
distribution of $31,250.00 per quarter; and (c) years three, four,
five and six is a distribution of $87,500 per quarter; for a total
distribution over the six (6) years of $1,625,000.00. The Debtor
will commence quarterly payments at the end of the first full
quarter that is sixty (60) days after the Effective Date.  Class 2
is Impaired by the Plan. The holders of Class 2 Claims are entitled
to vote to accept or reject the Plan. If Class 2 does not vote to
accept the Plan, the Debtor will request that the Plan be confirmed
nonetheless pursuant to Section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated April 25
is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/lamb17-10057-373.pdf

                      About Love Grace Holdings

Love Grace Holdings, Inc., doing business as Apricot Lane and Blu
Spero Boutique, operates a series of retail clothing outlets in
malls.  The locations are in Florida, Alabama, Louisiana and
Mississippi.

Love Grace Holdings filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. La.
Case No. 17-10057) on Jan. 20, 2017.  The petition was signed by
Arthur A. Lancaster, Jr., president and sole shareholder.  The case
is assigned to Judge Douglas D. Dodd.  The Debtor estimated assets
and liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

The Debtor is represented by Greta M. Brouphy, Esq., and Douglas S.
Draper, Esq., at Heller, Draper, Patrick, Horn & Dabney, LLC.

On Feb. 6, 2017, the U.S. trustee for Region 5 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee members
are: (1) GGP Limited Partnership; (2) Intex Flooring, LLC; and (3)
Douglas Kampen.  The Committee hired Paul Douglas Stewart, Jr.,
Esq., at Stewart Robbins & Brown, LLC, as its legal counsel.

No trustee or examiner has been appointed or designated in the
case.


MEJD PARTNERSHIP: Hires Mark E. Goodfriend as Bankruptcy Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
MEDJ Partnership seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of California, San Fernando Valley Division,
to hire Mark E. Goodfriend and the Law Offices of Mark E.
Goodfriend as general bankruptcy counsel.

The services to be rendered by the Law Offices are:

     a. consult with the United States Trustee, and/or debtor in
possession concerning the administration of the case;

     b. investigate the acts, conduct, assets, liabilities, and
financial condition of Debtor, the operation of the Debtor's
business and any other matter relevant to the case, to formulate
the Plan of Reorganization and to advise and counsel the Debtor
regarding matters of bankruptcy law;

     c. assist the Debtor in the preparation of reports, accounts,
applications and orders involving bankruptcy law;

     d. evaluate, review and consult on claims and the filing of
objections thereto as appropriate;

     e. participate in the formulation of a Disclosure Statement
and Plan of Reorganization, and to collect and file with the court
acceptances or rejections of said Plan or Plans;

     f. represent Debtor in proceedings or hearings before the
Bankruptcy Court in matters relating to this bankruptcy case; and

     g. perform such other services as are appropriate as General
Bankruptcy Counsel.

The firm will charge an hourly rate of $375.00 for its services.

Mark E. Goodfriend, principal at the Law Offices of Mark E.
Goodfriend, attests that he and his firm are "disinterested
persons" as that term is defined under Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code and Rules 2014, et seq. of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure.

The firm can be reached through:

     Mark E. Goodfriend, Esq.
     Law Offices of Mark E. Goodfriend
     16055 Ventura Boulevard
     Encino, CA 91436
     Phone: (818) 783-8866
     Fax: (818) 783-5445
     Email: mark@goodfriend@yahoo.com

                    About MEDJ Partnership

MEJD Partnership is a privately held company in Woodland Hills,
California engaged in activities related to real estate.  The
Company has a 50% interest in a real property located at 5132
Noble, Sherman Oaks, California having an appraised value of
$500,000.

MEJD Partnership filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bank. C.D. Cal. Case
No. April 18, 2018) on 18-10949.  In the petition signed by Ubaldo
Morales Escamilla, general partner, the Debtor estimated $500,000
in total assets and $2.1 million in liabilities.  The case is
assigned to Judge Maureen Tighe.  Mark E. Goodfriend, Esq., at the
Law Offices of Mark E. Goodfriend, is the Debtor's counsel.




MIRAGE DENTAL: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------------
Mirage Dental Associates, Professional LLC requests the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado to authorize its use
of cash collateral to allow the uninterrupted and continued
operations of its business and provide the Debtor with an
opportunity to propose a meaningful plan of reorganization.

The Debtor believes that these entities may assert a claim on cash
collateral:

     (a) Bank of America, N.A., asserts that it was owed a total of
approximately $669,723, secured by, among other things, the
Debtor's accounts, equipment, general intangibles, etc.

     (b) Live Oak Bank asserts that the current amounts owed on the
Debtor's loans with the Live Oak Bank are as follows: (a) term
loan: $1,712,230; (b) conventional loan: $1,011,886; and (c) SBA
Loan: $3,310,313. The loans are secured by substantially all of
Debtor's assets.

     (c) Ascentium Capital, LLC claims that, as of the Petition
Date, it is owed approximately $146,709 pursuant to the terms of an
Equipment Finance Agreement. As a result, Ascentium asserts a
purchase money security interest in the Debtor's computers and
software.

     (d) EverBank Commercial Finance, Inc. asserts that it was owed
approximately $563,063, as of the petition date. Under the terms of
a certain Equipment Finance Agreement with Spenser Capital Group,
Inc., doing business as Group Financial Services, the Debtor
granted Group Financial a security interest on the purchased
equipment and accessories. Spenser Capital Group assigned its claim
to EverBank.

     (e) Navitas Credit Corporation doing business as Navitas Lease
Corporation asserts that the Debtor owes $296,982.11 under the
Navitas Loan 1 and $67,892.59 under the Navitas Loan 2, as of the
Petition Date. Under the terms of the loans, the Debtor granted
Navitas a lien on the purchased equipment.

     (f) One Place Capital, a division of Bank Midwest asserts that
it is owed approximately $19,000 as of the Petition Date. To secure
the obligation to Bank Midwest, the Debtor granted a security
interest in Bison Medical CO2 laser. The Debtor uses the collateral
provided to Bank Midwest in its normal operations.

     (g) Business Financial Services, Inc., doing business as BFS
Capital asserts that it is owed approximately $301,010 on the
Second BFS Loan. The Second BFS Loan refinanced the First BFS Loan.
Per the terms of the First BFS Loan, the Debtor granted a lien on
its accounts, including its accounts receivable.

To the extent the Secured Creditors have valid properly perfected
liens on assets of the Debtor, the Secured Creditors are entitled
to adequate protection of their interests in the prepetition
collateral, including the cash collateral. The Debtor proposes to
pay the Secured Lenders the amounts set forth below commencing May
1, 2018, and be due on the first of each month thereafter. The
Adequate Protection Payments are as follows:

            (a) Bank of America: $6,600

            (b) Live Oak Bank: $10,000

            (c) Ascentium: $1,000

            (d) EverBank: $2,500

            (e) Navitas: $762

            (f) Bank Midwest: $369

            (g) BFS Capital: $1.00

As further adequate protection, the Debtor proposes to grant the
Secured Lenders the following:

      (a) The Secured Lenders will be entitled to a Section 507(b)
superpriority claim but only to the extent that the replacement
liens granted by the Debtor prove inadequate to protect the Secured
Lenders from a demonstrated diminution in value of their respective
collateral position from the Petition Date without deduction for
the Carve Outs.

      (b) To protect the Secured Lenders from any diminution in
value of their prepetition collateral, each Secured Lender will
have a replacement lien on their prepetition collateral and in the
post-petition property of the Debtor that is the same type of
property that the Secured Lenders hold duly perfected prepetition
liens upon, including, without limitation, accounts, inventory,
equipment, and farm products. The amount of the replacement liens
will be up to the amount of indebtedness owed to the Secured
Lenders. The priority of the Replacement Liens will be in the same
extent and priority as the Pre-Petition Liens.

       (c) Covenants. The Debtor will:

               -- Only use Cash Collateral consistent with the
Budget;

               -- Maintain and retain in good repair all property
in which the Secured Lenders claim an interest, including
maintaining insurance on such property;

               -- Not pay any prepetition debts or obligations of
the Debtor or its estate without further order of the Court; and

               -- Not grant any other post-petition liens to any
other party without the consent of the Secured Lenders or an order
of the Court on property that is subject to the liens of the
Secured Lenders.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob18-12496-59.pdf

                  About Mirage Dental Associates
                         Professional LLC

Mirage Dental Associates, Professional LLC, is a privately-held
company in Castle Rock, Colorado, that owns a dental clinic.

Mirage Dental Associates sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 18-12496) on March 30,
2018.  In the petition signed by Michael J. Moroni, Jr., managing
member, the Debtor disclosed $5.41 million in assets and $8.72
million in liabilities.  Judge Joseph G. Rosania Jr. presides over
the case.  The Debtor tapped Buechler & Garber, LLC, as its legal
counsel.  No official committee of unsecured creditors has been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


NIGHTHAWK ROYALTIES: Seeks Interim Approval to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------------
Nighthawk Royalties LLC and its certain affiliates request the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware for authority to use
cash collateral, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in
the Cash Collateral Orders, which have been agreed to with the
Commonwealth Bank of Australia ("CBA"), as Administrative Agent for
the Prepetition Secured Parties.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors had outstanding debt
obligations in the aggregate amount of over $55 million, including
accrued and unpaid interest, consisting primarily of their
obligations under the CBA Facility and the Unsecured Notes. The
approximate amount outstanding under the CBA Facility is $21.3
million, which includes interest in the approximate amount of
$50,000. The CBA Facility is fully guaranteed, on a senior secured
basis, by each of the Debtors.  The CBA Facility and related
guarantees are secured by substantially all of the Debtors' assets,
subject to permitted liens and specified excluded assets.

The Debtors grant the following security interests and liens to the
Administrative Agent, for the benefit of the Prepetition Secured
Parties:

     (a) A valid, binding, continuing, enforceable, fully-perfected
first priority senior priming security interest in, and lien on,
the Prepetition Collateral and all other of the Debtors' now owned
and hereafter- acquired real and personal property, assets and
rights of any kind or nature, including the proceeds, products,
offspring, rents, and profits thereof. The Adequate Protection
Liens will in all cases be senior to any other security interests
or liens, subject only to the Carve Outs and valid, perfected and
enforceable prepetition liens, if any, which are senior to the
Prepetition Secured Parties' liens or security interests as of the
Petition Date or to valid and unavoidable liens in existence
immediately prior to the Petition Date that are perfected
subsequent to the Petition Date as permitted by section 546(b) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

     (b) A valid, binding, continuing, enforceable, fully perfected
junior lien on and security interest in all prepetition and
postpetition property of the Debtors (other than the property
described directly above), whether now existing or hereafter
acquired, that is subject to valid, perfected, and unavoidable
liens, if any, in existence immediately prior to the Petition Date
that are senior to the Prepetition Secured Parties' liens and
security interests or to valid and unavoidable liens in existence
immediately prior to the Petition Date that are perfected
subsequent to the Petition Date as permitted by section 546(b) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

     (c) The Debtors will grant to the Administrative Agent, for
the benefit of the Prepetition Secured Parties, an allowed
superpriority administrative-expense claim against each of the
Debtors on a joint and several basis with priority over any and all
other administrative-expense claims against the Debtors now
existing or hereafter arising in the Cases.

     (d) The Debtors are authorized and directed to pay to the
Administrative Agent for the ratable benefit of the Prepetition
Secured Parties, adequate protection payments on the last business
day of each calendar month after the entry of the Interim Order, in
each case, in an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid prepetition
and postpetition interest, fees, and costs due and payable under
the Credit Agreement (including, without limitation, interest on
loans and accrued fees owing to the Administrative Agent), and, in
each case, such payments calculated based on the Alternate Base
Rate plus the Applicable Margin pursuant to the Credit Agreement.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb18-10989-45.pdf

                     About Nighthawk Energy

Nighthawk Energy -- http://www.nighthawkenergy.com-- is an
independent oil and natural gas company operating in the
Denver-Julesburg (DJ) Basin of Colorado, USA. The Debtors are the
direct and ultimate parent entities of non-debtors Nighthawk
Production LLC and OilQuest USA, LLC. The sole or primary operating
entity of the Debtors is Nighthawk Production, an oil and gas
exploration company which is organized under Delaware law and based
in Denver, Colorado.  Production's principal business activity is
the exploration for, as well as the development and sale of,
hydrocarbons, operating solely in the state of Colorado where it
holds interests in over 150,000 net mineral acres in and around
Lincoln County.  Nighthawk's common shares are publicly listed on
the London Stock Exchange (LSE:HAWK).  

Nighthawk Royalties LLC and Nighthawk Energy each filed separate
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-10989), on
April 30, 2018.  The petitions were signed by Rick McCullough,
president.  The case is assigned to Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon.


At the time of filing, Debtor Nighthawk Royalties estimated at
least $50,000 in  assets and $10 million to $50 million in
liabilities, while debtor Nighthawk Energy estimated $100,000 to
$500,000 in assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities.

The Debtors retained by Greenberg Traurig, LLP as counsel; SSG
Advisors, LLC as Investment Banker; and JND Corporate Restructuring
as claims aAgent.



NINE WEST: Committee Taps Akin Gump Strauss Hauer as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Nine West
Holdings, Inc., and its debtor affiliates seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to hire
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP as its counsel.

Services to be rendered by Akin Gump are:

     (a) advise the Committee with respect to its rights, duties
and powers in the Chapter 11 Cases;

     (b) assist and advise the Committee in its consultations and
negotiations with the Debtors relative to the administration of the
Chapter 11 Cases;

     (c) assist the Committee in analyzing the claims of the
Debtors' creditors and the Debtors' capital structure and in
negotiating with holders of claims and equity interests;

     (d) assist the Committee in its investigation of the acts,
conduct, assets, liabilities and financial condition of the Debtors
and their insiders and of the operation of the Debtors'
businesses;

     (e) assist the Committee in its analysis of, and negotiations
with, the Debtors or any third party concerning matters related to,
among other things, the assumption or rejection of certain leases
of non-residential real property and executory contracts, asset
dispositions, financing of other transactions and the terms of one
or more plans of reorganization for the Debtors and accompanying
disclosure statements and related plan documents;

     (f) assist and advise the Committee as to its communications
to the general creditor body regarding significant matters in the
Chapter 11 Cases;

     (g) represent the Committee at all hearings and other
proceedings before this Court;

     (h) review and analyze applications, orders, statements of
operations and schedules filed with the Court and advise the
Committee as to their propriety and, to the extent deemed
appropriate by the Committee, support, join or object thereto;

     (i) advise and assist the Committee with respect to any
legislative, regulatory or governmental activities;

     (j) assist the Committee in preparing pleadings and
applications as may be necessary in furtherance of the
Committee’s interests and objectives;

     (k) assist the Committee in its review and analysis of all of
the Debtors' various agreements;

     (l) prepare, on behalf of the Committee, any pleadings,
including, without limitation, motions, memoranda, complaints,
adversary complaints, objections or comments in connection with any
matter related to the Debtors or the Chapter 11 Cases;

     (m) investigate and analyze any claims against the Debtors’
non-debtor affiliates; and

     (n) perform such other legal services as may be required or
are otherwise deemed to be in the interests of the Committee in
accordance with the Committee’s powers and duties as set forth in
the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules or other applicable law.

The current hourly rates charged by Akin Gump are:

     Partners                      $840 to $1,695
     Senior Counsel and Counsel    $590 to $1,325
     Associates                    $495 to $915
     Paraprofessionals             $195 to $430

The principal attorneys assigned to the case and their hourly rates
are:

     Daniel H. Golden Partner / Financial Restructuring Department
$1,475
     Arik Preis Partner / Financial Restructuring Department       
$1,275
     David M. Zensky Partner / Litigation Department               
$1,240
     Deborah Newman Partner / Litigation Department                
$1,045
     Jason P. Rubin Partner / Financial Restructuring Department   
$1,030
     Kevin Zuzolo Counsel / Financial Restructuring Department     
   $915
     Anthony Loring Associate / Financial Restructuring Department
   $710

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for Reviewing Applications
for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Filed under 11
U.S.C. Sec. 330 for Attorneys in Larger Chapter 11 Cases, Daniel H.
Golden disclosed that:

     (a) Akin Gump did not agree to any variations from, or
alternatives to, its standard or customary billing arrangements for
this engagement;

     (b) No rate for any of the professionals included in this
engagement varies based on the geographic location of the
bankruptcy case;

     (c) Akin Gump did not represent any member of the Committee in
connection with the Debtors' Chapter 11 Cases prior to its
retention by the Committee;

     (d) Akin Gump expects to develop a prospective budget and
staffing plan to comply reasonably with the U.S. Trustee's request
for information and additional disclosures, as to which Akin Gump
reserves all rights; and

     (e) The Committee has approved Akin Gump's proposed hourly
billing rates. The Akin Gump attorneys staffed on the Debtors'
Chapter 11 Cases, subject to modification depending upon further
development.

Daniel H. Golden, member of the firm of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &
Feld LLP, attests that Akin Gump neither holds nor represents any
interest adverse to the Committee, the Debtors, their creditors or
other parties in interest or their respective attorneys in the
Chapter 11 Cases, and that Akin Gump is a "disinterested person"
within the meaning of Bankruptcy Code section 101(14).

The counsel can be reached through:

     Daniel H. Golden, Esq.
     Arik Preis, Esq.
     Jason P. Rubin, Esq.
     AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
     One Bryant Park
     New York, NY 10036
     Tel: (212) 872-1000
     Fax: (212) 872-1002
     E-mail: dgolden@akingump.com
             apreis@akingump.com
             jrubin@akingump.com
     
                   About Nine West Holdings

Nine West Holdings is a footwear, accessories, women's apparel, and
jeanswear company with a portfolio of brands that includes Nine
West, Anne Klein, and Gloria Vanderbilt.  The company is a
wholesale partner to major U.S. retailers and has international
licensing arrangements covering more than 1,200 points of sale
around the world.

On April 6, 2018, Nine West Holdings, Inc., and 10 affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
18-10947).  Nine West estimated $500 million to $1 billion in
assets and $1 billion to $10 billion in liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Shelley C. Chapman is the case judge.  Nine West Holdings'
legal advisors are Kirkland & Ellis LLP.  The Company's financial
advisor is Lazard Freres & Co., and its restructuring advisor is
Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims
and noticing agent.

The Independent Directors tapped Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP as
counsel and Berkeley Research Group as financial advisor.

William K. Harrington, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2, appointed
seven creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors.


NINE WEST: Committee Taps Houlihan Lokey as Investment Banker
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Nine West
Holdings, Inc., and its debtor affiliates seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to
retain Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. as its investment banker, nunc
pro tunc to April 25, 2018.

Services to be rendered by Houlihan Lokey are:

     a. analyze business plans and forecasts of the Debtors;

     b. evaluate the assets and liabilities of the Debtors,
including any analyses and/or testimony related to the solvency or
valuation of the Debtors;

     c. assess the financial issues and options concerning (i) the
sale of the Debtors, either in whole or in part, and (ii) the
Debtors' chapter 11 plan(s) of reorganization or liquidation or any
other chapter 11 plan(s);

     d. analyze and review the financial and operating statements
of the Debtors;

     e. provide such financial analyses as the Committee may
require in connection with the Chapter 11 cases;

     f. assist in the determination of an appropriate capital
structure for the Debtors;

     g. analyze strategic alternatives available to the Debtors;

     h. evaluate the Debtors' debt capacity in light of its
projected cash flows;

     i. assist in the financial review of the transactions related
to the leveraged buyout of The Jones Group, Inc. by Sycamore
Partners, L.P. and litigation with respect thereto;

     j. assist the Committee in identifying potential alternative
sources of liquidity in connection with any debtor-in-possession
financing, any chapter 11 plan(s) or otherwise;

     k. represent the Committee in negotiations with the Debtors
and third parties with respect to any of the foregoing;

     l. provide testimony in court on behalf of the Committee with
respect to any of the foregoing, if necessary; and

     m. provide such other financial advisory and investment
banking services as may be required by additional issues and
developments not anticipated on the Engagement Effective Date, as
described in Section 5 of the Engagement Agreement.

Fees Houlihan Lokey will charge are:

      * Monthly Fees: Houlihan Lokey will be paid in advance a
nonrefundable monthly cash fee of $150,000.  The first payment will
be made upon the approval of this Application by the Court and will
be in respect of the period from the Engagement Effective Date
through the month in which payment is made.  Thereafter, payment of
the Monthly Fee will be made on every monthly anniversary of the
Engagement Effective Date during the term of the Engagement
Agreement.  Each Monthly Fee will be earned upon Houlihan Lokey's
receipt thereof in consideration of Houlihan Lokey accepting this
engagement and performing services as described herein. 50% of the
Monthly Fees received by Houlihan Lokey after the sixth month of
the Engagement Agreement shall be credited against the Deferred Fee
to which Houlihan Lokey becomes entitled hereunder (it being
understood and agreed that no Monthly Fee will be credited more
than once), except that, in no event, will such Deferred Fee be
reduced below zero; and

      * Deferred Fee: In addition to the other fees provided for
herein, the Debtors shall pay Houlihan Lokey a fee to be paid in
cash of $3,500,000 upon confirmation by the Court of a plan of
reorganization or liquidation; provided that, unless otherwise
approved by the Committee, the Committee may reduce the Deferred
Fee to $2,000,000 if the Committee (x) recommends to unsecured
creditors to reject a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization or
liquidation with respect to the Debtors that is ultimately
confirmed, and (y) prosecutes material objections to such Approved
Plan that are not resolved prior to its effective date.

Saul Burian, managing director of Houlihan Lokey Capital, attests
that Houlihan Lokey is a "disinterested person" as that term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Saul Burian
     HOULIHAN LOKEY CAPITAL, INC.
     245 Park Avenue, 20th Fl.
     New York, NY 10167
     Tel: 212-497-4100
     Fax: 212-661-3070

                   About Nine West Holdings

Nine West Holdings is a footwear, accessories, women's apparel, and
jeanswear company with a portfolio of brands that includes Nine
West, Anne Klein, and Gloria Vanderbilt.  The company is a
wholesale partner to major U.S. retailers and has international
licensing arrangements covering more than 1,200 points of sale
around the world.

On April 6, 2018, Nine West Holdings, Inc., and 10 affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
18-10947).  Nine West estimated $500 million to $1 billion in
assets and $1 billion to $10 billion in liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Shelley C. Chapman is the case judge.  Nine West Holdings'
legal advisors are Kirkland & Ellis LLP.  The Company's financial
advisor is Lazard Freres & Co., and its restructuring advisor is
Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims
and noticing agent.

The Independent Directors tapped Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP as
counsel and Berkeley Research Group as financial advisor.

William K. Harrington, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2, appointed
seven creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors.


NINE WEST: Committee Taps Protiviti Inc as Financial Advisor
------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Nine West
Holdings, Inc., and its debtor affiliates seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to
retain Protiviti Inc. as financial advisor and forensic accountant
nunc pro tunc to April 27, 2018.

Services to be rendered by Protiviti are:

     (a) review and analysis of the Debtors' weekly financial and
cash flow performance as compared to their budgets;

     (b) review and analyze historical operating results and recent
performance and comparison to Debtors' forecasts;

     (c) review and analysis of Debtors' business segments and
operating performance;

     (d) review, analyze, do forensic accounting and litigation
support related to the 2014 Transaction, the Carve-Out Transactions
and other transactions occurring between 2014 and the filing date;

     (e) analyze Debtors' business performance;

     (f) assessment of intercompany claims and transfers;

     (g) analyze related to claims waterfall and substantive
consolidation issues;

     (h) review and analysis of first day motions;

     (i) review and analysis of statements and schedules;

     (j) analyze general unsecured claims;

     (k) evaluate the assets and liabilities of the Debtors
including interests in non-Debtor entities;

     (l) identification and determination of unencumbered assets;

     (m) assess the financial and claims issues concerning the
Debtors' chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization or liquidation or any
other chapter 11 plans;

     (n) review and analysis of Debtors' Plan of Reorganization and
Disclosure Statement with respect to claims and treatment of
creditors;

     (o) assist the Committee and its counsel in developing
strategies and related negotiations with the Debtors and other
interested parties with respect to elements of the Debtors'
treatment of the unsecured creditors under the proposed Plan of
Reorganization or such treatment under alternative proposals;

     (p) provide such financial analyses as the Committee may
require in connection with the Debtors;

     (q) represent the Committee in negotiations with the Debtors
and third parties with respect to any of the foregoing;

     (r) provide information in support of or testimony in court on
behalf of the Committee with respect to any of the foregoing, if
necessary; and

     (s) assist the Committee and its counsel as requested with
respect to various financial matters.

The customary hourly rates by Protiviti professionals are:

     Managing Directors                    $665 - $740
     Associate Directors and Directors     $435 - $595
     Managers and Senior Managers          $360 - $495
     Consultants and Senior Consultants    $235 - $345
     Administrative                        $125 - $175

Michael Atkinson, managing director of Protiviti Inc., attests that
Protiviti and its employees are disinterested parties as defined in
11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(14), and neither hold nor represent any interest
adverse to the Debtors, the Debtors' estates, or the Committee on
the matters upon which they are to be engaged and their employment
would be in the best interests of the Debtors' estates.

The firm can be reached through:

     Michael Atkinson, Esq.
     Protiviti Inc.
     1 E. Pratt St. Suite 900
     Baltimore, MD 21202
     Phone: 404-926-4347
     Fax: 410-454-6801
     Email: michael.atkinson@protiviti.com

                   About Nine West Holdings

Nine West Holdings is a footwear, accessories, women's apparel, and
jeanswear company with a portfolio of brands that includes Nine
West, Anne Klein, and Gloria Vanderbilt.  The company is a
wholesale partner to major U.S. retailers and has international
licensing arrangements covering more than 1,200 points of sale
around the world.

On April 6, 2018, Nine West Holdings, Inc., and 10 affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
18-10947).  Nine West estimated $500 million to $1 billion in
assets and $1 billion to $10 billion in liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Shelley C. Chapman is the case judge.  

Nine West Holdings' legal advisors are Kirkland & Ellis LLP.  The
Company's financial advisor is Lazard Freres & Co., and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC.  Prime
Clerk LLC is the claims
and noticing agent.

The Independent Directors tapped Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP as
counsel and Berkeley Research Group as financial advisor.

William K. Harrington, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2, appointed
seven creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors.


OPT CO: Approval Hearing on Plan Outline Set for June 13
--------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Brenda Moody Whinery will convene a hearing on
June 13, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. to consider the approval of the
disclosure statement filed by Opt Co.

Written objections to the disclosure statement must be filed by
June 6, 2018.

The allowed general unsecured claims against the Debtors total
$1,070,226.  There are also several disputed or contingent
unsecured claims that may eventually be included in the allowed
unsecured claims:

   Mobile Mini   $5,448
   Custis Contracting Services  $49,729
   Sompo International Insurance  $409,250
   Prime Alliance   $1,544,118

The Consolidated Debtors anticipate an initial distribution of
$85,000 to holders of allowed general unsecured claims (Class 11).
If the Consolidated Debtors receive any additional funds by the
sale of remaining assets or recovery in a preference action,
post-confirmation, after payment of all attorneys' fees and costs
related to that preference action and any additional management
fees due to Joseph Cook, the additional sale or litigation proceeds
will be distributed within 60 days of receipt, pro rata, to the
Class 11 claim holders.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb17-06091-315.pdf

                         About Opt Co

Opt Co. operates as a painting contractor.  It offers exterior,
interior, custom homes, garage epoxy, and fences painting and
coating services.  It serves industrial, commercial, and
residential customers in the State of New York. Most of the
principal assets of Opt Co. and its affiliates are located at 5136
S. Desert View Apache Junction, Arizona.

Opt Co. and eight of its affiliates sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case Nos. 17-06091 to
17-06098, and 17-06100) on May 31, 2017.  Joseph Cook, personal
representative of estate of Allan Kauffman, signed the petitions.

Debtors Opt Co, 4K Builders, Inc., Blu Enterprises, Inc., Vintage
Millworks, Inc., Southwest Renewable Resources, LLC, Optco
Residential Painting, LLC, Arizona Natural Resources Products, LLC,
and Arizona Steel Finishing, LLC, each listed under $50,000 in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  Debtor 4K
Properties, Ltd, listed under $50,000 in assets and $10 million to
$50 million in liabilities.

Judge Brenda Moody Whinery presides over the cases.  The Debtors
hired Davis Miles McGuire Gardner, PLLC, as counsel.


PNEUMA INTERNATIONAL: Distribution to Unsecureds Raised to $1.5MM
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Pneuma International, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of California its latest small business
disclosure statement describing its plan of reorganization dated
May 8, 2018.

Under the latest plan, general unsecured creditors are classified
in Class 2 and will receive a distribution of 5% of their allowed
claims, to be distributed as a pro rata distribution of
$1,528,826.76.  The previous plan's proposal was a pro rata
distribution of $114,121.43.

A full-text copy of the latest Disclosure Statement is available
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb17-42149-98.pdf

                About Pneuma International

Pneuma International, Inc., doing business as EGPAK, is a
manufacturer of coated and laminated packaging paper based in
Hayward, California.  EGPAK filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
N.D. Cal. Case No. 17-42149) on Aug. 25, 2017.  In the petition
signed by Mikahel Chang, principal, the Debtor estimated $100,000
to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.
Judge Roger L. Efremsky is the case judge.  Nancy Weng, Esq. at
Tsao-Wu & Yee, LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


R44 LENDING: Hires Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, APLC, as Insolvency Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------------
R44 Lending Group, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California, San Fernando Valley
Division, to hire Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, Esq. and The Shinbrot Firm
as general insolvency counsel to the Debtor.

The legal services required will be legal advice and guidance with
respect to the
powers, duties, rights and obligations of the Applicant as
Debtor-in-Possession, the formulation and preparation of a Plan of
Reorganization and Disclosure Statement, and to prepare on behalf
of the Applicant all legal documents as may be necessary, and to
perform such legal services as are required in these Chapter 11
proceedings.

Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, Esq. will charge an hourly rate of $525.00 for
his services.

Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, Esq. attests that the Shinbrot Firm is a
"disinterested person" as defined by 11 U.S.C. Section 101(14) and
it has no connection with the
Applicant's creditors, or any other party.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, Esq.
     Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, APLC
     8200 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 400
     Beverly Hills, CA 90211
     Phone: (310) 659-5444
     Fax: (310) 878-8304
     Email: jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com

                   About R44 Lending Group

R44 Lending Group, LLC owns in fee simple a real property located
at 218 West Carson Street Carson CA 90746 valued by the company at
$650,000.

R44 Lending Group, LLC filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 18-15559) on May 15, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Leo Starflinger, managing member, the Debtor disclosed $663,034 in
total assets and $3.02 million in total liabilities.  The case is
assigned to Judge Neil W. Bason.  Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, Esq. at
Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, APLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


RAIN TREE HEALTHCARE: District Ct. Affirms Dismissal of Ch. 11 Case
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Appellant Rain Tree Healthcare of Winston-Salem, LLC, in the
appeals case captioned RAIN TREE HEALTHCARE OF WINSTON-SALEM, LLC,
Appellant, v. J & F PARTNERS, LLC, and WILLIAM P. MILLER,
Appellees, No. 1:17CV546 (M.D.N.C.) filed a voluntary petition for
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina. The Bankruptcy Court then entered a
written order adopting its oral findings and formally dismissing
the case. Rain Tree then filed a motion to stay, which was denied.
Rain Tree then appealed the order.

Upon review, District Judge William L. Osteen, Jr., finds that
cause for dismissal existed under 1112(b) for both substantial or
continuing loss to or diminution of the estate and bad faith and
accordingly affirms the Bankruptcy Court's order.

Rain Tree raised 11 issues on appeal. One of these issues is
whether the Bankruptcy Court erred in dismissing Rain Tree's case
for cause under section 1112(b). In dismissing the case, the
Bankruptcy Court listed three independent bases for its decision:
res judicata, cause under section 1112(b), and bad faith.

The Bankruptcy Court found cause to dismiss the case under section
1112(b)(4)(A), stating that "there is a substantial continuing loss
to or diminution of the estate, and that there is an absence of any
likelihood of reorganization."

Arguing that the Bankruptcy Court erred in dismissing its case for
cause under 11 U.S.C. section 1112(b)(4)(A), Rain Tree first
contends that the court improperly "relied on [the] perceived
inability of Appellant to cure its lease with J & F Partners" when
section 365(d)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code "affords the Debtor 120
days to assume of [sic] reject a commercial lease with an
additional 90-day extension for cause." In so arguing, Rain Tree
suggests that its case was improperly dismissed at too early a
stage of the bankruptcy proceedings.

Rain Tree has not presented any authority supporting its contention
that bankruptcy cases may not be dismissed under section 1112 prior
to the expiration of the 120-day time frame for rejection or
assumption of a lease under section 365. Given that 11 U.S.C.
seection 1112(b)(3) contemplates decisions on motions to convert or
dismiss being rendered within forty-five days of filing, without
reference to the age of the case, it seems that Rain Tree's
argument is without merit. However, the court need not definitively
resolve this question for two reasons. First, even if the
Bankruptcy Court improperly dismissed Rain Tree's case prior to the
120-day period provided by section 365, Rain Tree has presented no
evidence sufficient to convince this court that, in light of the
substantial continuing losses to its business, that Rain Tree could
have successfully cured the arrearage under the lease with more
time. Both bankruptcy courts, in dismissing Rain Tree's case,
commented on Rain Tree's continual failure to pay rent.

Accordingly, the court concludes that the Bankruptcy Court did not
err in dismissing Rain Tree's case for cause under section
1112(b)(4)(A).

The court also agrees with the Bankruptcy Court's finding of both
objective futility and subjective bad faith in this case. The
objective futility of Rain Tree's case is evidenced by facts
indicating that there is not a likelihood of reorganization.
Subjective bad faith is evidenced by Rain Tree's use of bankruptcy
proceedings to stall its inevitable eviction from the commercial
facility and engagement in forum shopping. For this reason, the
court concludes that the Bankruptcy Court appropriately dismissed
Rain Tree's case for cause due to a lack of good faith.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated
May 1, 2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2LkSUD7 from
Leagle.com.

RAIN TREE HEALTHCARE OF WINSTON SALEM, LLC, Debtor, represented by
ROBERT LEWIS, Jr. -- lewis@gorlaw.com -- GODON & MELUN, LLC.

RAIN TREE HEALTHCARE OF WINSTON SALEM, LLC, Appellant, represented
by ROBERT LEWIS, Jr., GODON & MELUN, LLC.

J&F PARTNERS, LLC, Appellee, represented by CONSTANCE L. YOUNG --
constance.young@wbd-us.com  --  WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP.

WILLIAM P. MILLER, Appellee, represented by ROBERT E. PRICE, Jr.,
U. S. BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF N. C.

                 About Rain Tree Healthcare

Rain Tree Healthcare of Winston Salem, LLC, is a limited liability
corporation headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, and is
engaged in the management and operation of an adult care home for
the mentally and physically disabled in Winston Salem, North
Carolina.

Rain Tree Healthcare of Winston Salem filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. M.D.N.C. Case No. 17-50375) on April 1, 2017.  Reema Owens,
managing member/organizer, signed the petition.  At the time of
filing, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities between
$500,000 and $1 million.

The Debtor's counsel is Robert Lewis, Jr., Esq., at Gordon & Melun,
PLLC.  The Debtor's accountant is John Edward Brown, CPA.

The Assistant U.S. Bankruptcy Administrator, Robert E. Price, Jr.,
has appointed Victor Orija of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman
for the State of North Carolina, as Patient Care Ombudsman for the
Debtor.


RESOLUTE FOREST: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable & Affirms 'BB-' CCR
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on Montreal-based Resolute
Forest Products Inc. to stable from negative and affirmed its 'BB-'
long-term corporate credit rating on the company.

At the same time, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B+' issue-level
rating, with a '5' recovery rating, on the company's senior
unsecured notes. The '5' recovery rating indicates S&P's
expectation for modest (10%-30%; rounded estimate 25%) recovery in
the event of default.

S&P said, "The outlook revision primarily reflects our view that
continuing strength in lumber and pulp prices, coupled with price
increases in newsprint, should enable Resolute to generate earnings
and cash flows above our previous expectations in 2018 and 2019. We
now expect the company to generate and sustain credit measures that
are commensurate with our ratings, which factor in a full year of
countervailing and anti-dumping duties. We estimate the company's
adjusted debt-to-EBITDA (leverage) ratio will be at about 4x over
the next two years, which is consistent with our outlook trigger to
stable from negative.

"The stable outlook on Resolute reflects our view that adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA will improve to about 4x over the next two years. We
expect lumber and pulp prices will, on average, remain near
currently strong levels in 2018 and 2019, with improvement in
specialty products and newsprint prices this year. We also expect
the company to generate positive free cash flow, which provides
financial flexibility to manage potential price volatility over the
next two years.

"We could downgrade the company if we expect adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA to increase above 5x or EBITDA interest coverage and
stay near 2x. This could occur from deterioration in realized
prices that, combined with tariffs, lead to earnings and cash flow
materially below our expectations. We could also downgrade the
company if its liquidity materially weakens to an extent that no
longer supports the current one-notch uplift on the rating.
"Although unlikely over the next 12 months, we could upgrade the
company if adjusted debt-to-EBITDA were to drop to and remain below
4x and Resolute demonstrated improvement in its profitability and
in its product mix shift away from papers with more favorable
long-term demand fundamentals. In the absence of such improvement,
we could raise the ratings if we expect adjusted debt-to-EBITDA to
decline and remain below 3x."


ROCKDALE HOSPITALITY: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral on Final Basis
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Ronald B. King of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Texas authorized Rockdale Hospitality, LLC to
use cash collateral strictly subject to the protections and
consideration described in the final order and only in the amounts
and for the expenses set forth on the monthly budget, including
U.S. Trustee fees incurred during this case.

The Debtor is prohibited from paying any wages or salaries to its
insiders, including the management fee of Kamlesh Patel, absent
further Court order or written agreement of the parties approving
such payments.

The Debtor is indebted to First Guaranty Bank, as
successor-by-merger to Synergy Bank, SSB in at least the principal
amount of $1,739,704 remaining due under a $2 million purchase
money term loan, secured by real property, cash, accounts,
furniture fixtures, equipment, rents, and other property.

The Debtor is authorized to collect and receive all cash funds, and
account each month to First Guaranty Bank for all funds received.
The Debtor will maintain an accounting of all funds deposited into
the DIP Account, and expended to pay the expenses set forth in the
Budget. Beginning on the 5th day of June, and on each successive
month, the Debtor will provide First Guaranty Bank with: a monthly
rolling budget that includes an income statement, cash flow, aging
report, payment history, and balance sheet, with the reports
showing the prior period's variance between the Budget and actual
performance.

First Guaranty Bank is granted valid, binding, enforceable, and
perfected liens co-extensive with the First Guaranty Bank's
pre-petition liens in all currently owned or hereafter acquired
property and assets of the Debtor, of any kind or nature, whether
real or personal, tangible or intangible, wherever located, now
owned or hereafter acquired or arising and all proceeds and
products, co-extensive with its pre-petition liens, but only to the
extent such liens on property and assets existed pre-petition.

As adequate protection for the diminution in value of First
Guaranty Bank's interests, First Guaranty Bank is granted,
effective as of the Petition Date, valid, binding and enforceable
replacement liens and security interests, in all currently owned or
hereafter acquired property and assets of the Debtor, of the same
kind or nature that First Guaranty Bank had prepetition, whether
real or personal, tangible or intangible, wherever located, now
owned or hereafter acquired or arising and all proceeds and
products, co-extensive with First Guaranty Bank's pre-petition
liens. This additional adequate protection is being given to the
extent of any decrease in value of the property and Cash Collateral
as a result of the Debtor's post-petition use.

In addition, as adequate protection in accordance with Section
363(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtor has and will:

     (a) Pay and deliver to First Guaranty Bank the amount of
$2,500 on or before March 23, 2018; and

     (b) Pay and deliver to First Guaranty Bank on June 1, 2018 and
on the 1st day of each successive month the amount of $11,000 to be
applied to post-petition debt service;

     (c) Pay and deliver to First Guaranty Bank: (i) on or before
March 1, 2018 the sum of $5,500 to be held in escrow for payment of
estimated property tax liability accrued during January and
February 2018; and (ii) beginning March 1, 2018, and on each
successive month thereafter, $2,750 as a monthly estimate of annual
property tax payments for the current calendar year, with such
funds to be held in escrow by First Guaranty Bank, subject to the
terms and conditions of the First Guaranty Loan;

     (d) The application of the adequate protection payments is
subject to further Order of the Court.

A full-text copy of the Final Order is available at

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb18-60100-57.pdf

                    About Rockdale Hospitality

Rockdale Hospitality, LLC, a small business debtor as defined in 11
U.S.C. Section 101(51D), is in the traveler accommodation
business.

Rockdale Hospitality, doing business as Days Inn, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 18-60100) on Feb. 13, 2018.
In the petition signed by Kamlesh Patel, manager, the Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.  The
case is assigned to Judge Ronald B. King.  Joyce W. Lindauer
Attorney, PLLC, is the Debtor's counsel.  The Debtor tapped Aaron
Hungerford as accountant.


SCHRATTER FOODS: Chapter 727 Claims Bar Date Set for Aug. 28
------------------------------------------------------------
Schratter Foods Incorporated filed on April 30, 2018, a petition
commencing an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors proceeding,
pursuant to Chapter 727, Florida Statutes, to Leslie S. Osborne as
Assignee.

Pursuant to Florida Statutes 727.105, no proceeding may be
commenced against the Assignee except as provided in Chapter 727
and except in the case of a secured creditor enforcing its rights
and collateral under Chapter 679, there shall be no levy,
execution, attachment, or the like in the respect of any judgment
against assets of the estate, other than real property, in the
possession, custody, or control of the Assignee.

To receive any dividend in this proceeding, interested parties must
file a Proof of Claim with the Assignee:

     Les S. Osborne
     1300 North Federal Highway, Suite 203
     Boca Raton, FL 33432

on or before August 28, 2018 (120 days from the date the Petition
was filed).

The case is, In Re: Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of
SCHRATTER FOODS INCORPORATED, Assignor, To: LESLIE S. OSBORNE,
Assignee, Case No.: 2018-013998-CA-01, in the Circuit Court of the
Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida.

Schratter Foods has its principle place of business at 11421 NW
107th Street, Suite 1, Miami, FL 33178.


SEABOARD REALTY: Court Junks UCF Suit vs Berkowitz
--------------------------------------------------
District Judge Victor A. Bolden granted the Defendant's motion to
dismiss the case captioned UC FUNDING I, LP, TRUSTEE, and UCF I
TRUST 1, Plaintiffs, v. BERKOWITZ, TRAGER & TRAGER, LLC, Defendant,
No. 3:17-cv-1325 (VAB) (D. Conn.).

UCF I Trust 1 and UC Funding I, L.P., Trustee filed a Complaint
against Berkowitz, Trager & Trager, LLC alleging breach of
contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair
dealing, and negligent misrepresentation, based on an opinion
letter authored by Berkowitz that allegedly induced the Plaintiffs
to enter into a contract that eventually resulted in a loss of
approximately $13,000,000.

The Plaintiffs allege that Berkowitz acted as counsel to various
entities connected with the Park Square West Entities. The
Plaintiffs allege that Berkowitz "issued an opinion letter
addressed to UCFT concerning the PSW Mezzanine Loan, Guaranty,
Pledge Agreement and the additional agreements memorializing the
loan transaction set forth therein."

The Plaintiffs allege that, in December 2015, Seaboard Realty, LLC,
and its affiliate entities, including the Park Square West LLC, the
borrower, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Plaintiffs allege
that "[t]hrough the bankruptcy case, the real estate owned by Park
Square West Associates, LLC controlled Seaboard Realty LLC, was
sold and purchased by an affiliate of UCFT for approximately $43
million." The Plaintiffs also allege that because the Park Square
West LLC did not own 100%, "UCFT's security interest did not attach
to the 100% interest in PSW Mezzanine Borrower," and as a result,
the Plaintiffs lost more than $13,000,000.

Berkowitz has moved to dismiss the Complaint, arguing that the
Plaintiffs' claims, for breach of contract, breach of the implied
covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and negligent
misrepresentation, all fail as a matter of law.   

Here, the Plaintiffs have not alleged that Plaintiffs were the
intended beneficiaries of the attorney-client relationship between
Berkowitz and the Park Square West Entities. In fact, the Opinion
Letter specifically states that Berkowitz served as counsel to the
Park Square West Entities, "in connection with the loan by UCF I
Trust 1," referencing the Plaintiffs merely as the lender of the
mezzanine loan--not as an intended beneficiary as in Stowe.

In the absence of any express language in the Opinion Letter
imposing a contractual obligation on Berkowitz to provide legal
services for the Plaintiffs, Connecticut law presumes that adverse
parties in financial transactions are represented by their own
counsel and not by the counsel of their adversaries.

While the Plaintiffs argue that their reliance on the Opinion
Letter would not affect Berkowitz's attorney-client relationship
with the Park Square West Entities, a lack of interference with the
attorney-client relationship is not the applicable standard. The
Connecticut Supreme Court in Krawczyk precluded the imposition of
liability to third parties that "would not comport with a lawyer's
duty of undivided loyalty to the client." In a commercial
transaction, a lawyer cannot have "undivided loyalty" to her client
and also have a legal obligation to the party adverse to her client
in the transaction without express language indicating otherwise.

Because the Plaintiffs are neither a party to a contract with
Berkowitz nor the intended third-party beneficiary of a contract
between the Park Square West Entities and Berkowitz, Count One,
their breach of contract claim against Berkowitz, must be
dismissed.

For the same reasons that the Plaintiffs lack a viable breach of
contract claim, they also lack a viable claim based on the covenant
of good faith and fair dealing. Count Two of the Complaint,
therefore, must be dismissed.

Finally, the Plaintiffs allege that Berkowitz "failed to exercise
reasonable care in communicating information related [to] the
ownership of PSW Mezzanine Borrower to UCFT" and therefore assert
that Berkowitz is liable for negligent misrepresentation.  The
Defendants argue that this tort claim is barred by the three-year
statute of limitations under Conn.  Even if the Plaintiffs' claims
were within the statute of limitations, the Plaintiffs have not
sufficiently alleged that they reasonably relied on Berkowitz's
advice.

A full-text copy of the Court's Ruling dated May 1, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2GGY7S1 from Leagle.com.

UCF I Trust 1 & UC Funding I, LP, Trustee, Plaintiffs, represented
by Jeffrey M. Sklarz -- jsklarz@gs-lawfirm.com -- Green & Sklarz
LLC, Evangeline Ververis Kliegman -- ekliegman@gs-lawfirm.com --
Green & Sklarz, LLC & Kellianne Baranowsky --
kbaranowsky@gs-lawfirm.com -- Green & Sklarz, LLC.

Berkowitz, Trager & Trager, LLC, Defendant, represented by Cristin
E. Sheehan -- csheehan@morrisonmahoney.com -- Morrison, Mahoney
LLP-CT & James L. Brawley -- jbrawley@morrisonmahoney.com --
Morrison, Mahoney LLP-CT.

                      About Seaboard Realty

Seaboard Realty LLC and certain of its affiliates on Dec. 13, 2015,
filed petitions with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware seeking protection under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code.

Seaboard and its affiliates own a portfolio of first class
commercial real estate in Stamford, Connecticut, including office,
residential and hotel properties.  All operations are expected to
continue as normal throughout this process.

The Chapter 11 filing includes Seaboard Realty LLC and a number of
affiliates it manages, which own the equity of subsidiaries that
directly own the properties, but does not include the
property-owning subsidiaries themselves.

Seaboard Realty LLC is owned by John DiMenna, Thomas Kelly and
William Merritt.  Mr. DiMenna actively managed the Seaboard
operations as the managing member of Seaboard Realty LLC, and
managed the properties owned by its affiliates through a
property-management company owned solely by Mr. DiMenna.

The Debtors have sought and obtained an order authorizing joint
administration of their Chapter 11 cases, with all further
pleadings or other papers to be filed in the case of Newbury Common
Associates, LLC, Case No. 15-12507 (LSS).

The Debtors tapped Dechert LLP as counsel and directing the
accounting firm of Anchin, Block and Anchin as forensic accountant.


SHERIDAN PRODUCTION I-A: $98MM Bank Debt Trades at 16.17% Off
-------------------------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Sheridan Production
Partners I-A LP is a borrower traded in the secondary market at
83.83 cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, May 18,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 0.80 percentage points from
the previous week. Sheridan Production I-A pays 350 basis points
above LIBOR to borrow under the $98 million facility. The bank loan
matures on October 1, 2019. Moody's rates the loan 'Caa3' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'B' rating to the loan. The loan is one of
the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated
loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week
ended Friday, May 18.


SHERIDAN PRODUCTION I-M: $60MM Bank Debt Trades at 16.17% Off
-------------------------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Sheridan Production
Partners I-M LP is a borrower traded in the secondary market at
83.83 cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, May 18,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 0.80 percentage points from
the previous week. Sheridan Production pays 350 basis points above
LIBOR to borrow under the $60 million facility. The bank loan
matures on October 1, 2019. Moody's rates the loan 'Caa3' and
Standard & Poor's gave no rating to the loan. The loan is one of
the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated
loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week
ended Friday, May 18.


SHERIDAN PRODUCTION: $900MM Bank Debt Trades at 16.17% Off
----------------------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Sheridan Production
Partners is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 83.83
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, May 18, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents an increase of 0.80 percentage points from the
previous week. Sheridan Production pays 350 basis points above
LIBOR to borrow under the $900 million facility. The bank loan
matures on October 1, 2019. Moody's gave no rating to the loan and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'B' rating to the loan. The loan is one of
the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated
loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week
ended Friday, May 18.


SIGEL'S BEVERAGES: Amended Plan Outline OK'd; June 13 Plan Hearing
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert L. Jones of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas approved Sigel's Beverages, L.P.'s first amended
disclosure statement in support of its plan of liquidation.

June 6, 2018 at 4:00 p.m., Prevailing Central Time, is fixed as the
deadline by which the holders of claims and interests against the
Debtor may submit their ballots to vote to accept the Plan.

June 8, 2018 at 4:00 p.m., Prevailing Central Time, is fixed as the
deadline by which creditors and parties in interest may file
written objections to the confirmation of the Plan.

A hearing on confirmation of the Plan will be held on June 13, 2018
at 1:00 p.m. Prevailing Central Time in the Courtroom of the
Honorable Barbara J. Houser, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge,
1100 Commerce St., 14th Floor, Dallas, Texas 75242.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that creditors
holding Class 4 general unsecured claims under the latest plan will
be paid 10% of their claims. Each unsecured creditor will receive
its pro rata share of the amount in the unsecured distribution
reserve.

A copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb16-34118-407.pdf

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb16-34118-394.pdf

                      About Sigel's Beverage

Sigel's Beverage, L.P., is a 111-year-old distributor and
wholesaler of fine wines and spirits.  It is one of the largest
local distributors of alcohol in the Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex.
In addition to its wholesale division, it also operates 10 retail
store locations in the Metroplex.

Sigel's Beverage, L.P., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 16-34118) on Oct. 20,
2016.  Anthony J. Bandiera, chief executive officer of Milan
General Investments, Inc., general partner of the Debtor, signed
the petition. Judge Barbara J. Houser presides over the Debtor's
case.  

The Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

Pronske, Goolsby & Kathman, P.C., serves as counsel to the Debtor,
with the engagement, led Gerrit M. Pronske, Esq., and Jason P.
Kathman, Esq.  Bridgepoint Consulting, LLC, is the Debtor's
financial and restructuring advisor. Candy & Schonwald, PLLC,
serves as tax service provider.


SOAR INTO YOUR DESTINY: Wants Emergency Access to Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Soar Into Your Destiny, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of New York for authority to use, on an
emergency basis, cash collateral subject to the prepetition lien of
US Income Partners, LLC.

The Debtor desires to use cash collateral in the ordinary course of
business in order to continue the operation and rehabilitation of
its business.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor was indebted to US Income
Partners in the principal amount of $75,000.  Payment of the debt
is secured by a perfected first priority security interest in
Debtor's real estate evidenced by a Mortgage upon a real property
commonly known as 2926-2934 Genesee Street, Cheektowaga, New York
14225, and an assignment to US Income Partners of Debtor's interest
in all leases, rents and profits generated from said premises.

The Debtor believes that there are no other creditors holding
perfected security interest in its assets.  Subsequent to the
filing of Debtor's petition, US Income Partners notified the Debtor
that it did not consent, and had not consented to Debtor's use of
any cash collateral.

Although counsel for US Income Partners requested Debtor's counsel
to propose a stipulation for adequate protection and use of cash
collateral at the 341 meeting, which proposed stipulation was
delivered to counsel on May 7, 2018, US Income Partners has not
proposed any changes to or any different proposed stipulation.

The Debtor, therefore, seeks use of cash collateral on an emergency
basis in the absence of such consent, to enable payment of adequate
protection to US Income Partners and to ensure the timely payment
of other essential postpetition expenses of operating and
preserving Debtor's estate.

In exchange for the Debtor's use of cash collateral, the Debtor
proposes to provide adequate protection to US Income Partners in
the form of (a) roll-over or replacement lien granting security to
the same extent, to the same relative priority, and with respect to
the same assets as served as collateral for US Income Partners'
Indebtedness to the extent the cash collateral is actually used,
without the need of any further recordation to perfect such liens
or security interests; and (b) monthly cash payments to be proposed
out of cash reflected in the Budget.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nywb18-10659-22.pdf

                    About Soar Into Your Destiny

Soar Into Your Destiny, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-10659) on April
10, 2018.  In the petition signed by the Chairman of the Board,
Kale L. Mann, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of less
than $500,000.  Judge Michael J. Kaplan presides over the case.
Raymond C. Stilwell, Esq., at the Law Offices of Raymond C.
Stilwell, serves as the Debtor's counsel.



TAYLOR BEAN: Summary Judgment Ruling Against Cocrofts Upheld
------------------------------------------------------------
The Appellate Court of Illinois affirms the trial court's ruling
granting summary judgment in plaintiff's favor in the appeals case
captioned TAYLOR, BEAN, & WHITAKER MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID COCROFT and VEYNECIA COCROFT,
Defendants, (David Cocroft, Defendant-Appellant), No. 1-17-0969
(Ill. App.).

The appeal arises from a foreclosure action filed against defendant
David Cocroft and his wife, Veynecia Cocroft, by plaintiff Taylor,
Bean, & Whitaker Mortgage Corporation. The trial court granted
summary judgment in the plaintiff's favor, and the property was
sold at a judicial sale, at which the plaintiff was the highest
bidder.

The Defendant appeals, arguing (1) the trial court erred in
permitting the plaintiff to amend its complaint to substitute the
plaintiff as a party instead of the originally-named plaintiff, (2)
the trial court erred in denying the defendant's motion to strike
the note attached to the amended complaint, (3) the trial court
erred in granting the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment
despite the defendant's allegation that he had not received the
required grace period notice and his arguments that the plaintiff
was not the holder of the note, and (4) the trial court erred in
confirming the sale because justice was not done.

The Defendant argues that leave to file the amended complaint
should have been denied based on res judicata, lack of standing,
and rescission. Here, the defendant's claim of res judicata is
based on a prior foreclosure complaint filed by the plaintiff
against the defendant that was based on the same loan, which was
voluntarily dismissed without prejudice on Oct. 15, 2009. However,
"a dismissal 'without prejudice' signals that there was no final
decision on the merits and that the plaintiff is not barred from
refiling the action." Thus, in the instant case, as there was no
final decision on the merits, there can be no res judicata bar to
plaintiff's foreclosure complaint.

Defendant also argues that the trial court should not have
permitted amendment of the complaint because plaintiff lacked
standing. However, defendant's arguments in his brief concerning
this issue relate only to the standing of Colonial Bank, the
previous plaintiff, and not plaintiff, the named party after
amendment of the complaint. Since amendment was based on removing
Colonial Bank as plaintiff and substituting plaintiff, any
arguments as to Colonial Bank's lack of standing are irrelevant to
the propriety of the amended complaint and do not serve as a basis
for denying amendment. Accordingly, the Court cannot find that the
trial court abused its discretion in permitting amendment of the
complaint.

The Defendant next argues that the trial court erred in denying his
motion to strike the note that was attached to the amended
complaint. The Defendant claims that because the note attached to
the original complaint bore one blank endorsement, while the note
attached to the amended complaint bore three endorsements, the
additional endorsements "were a forgery." However, defendant
provides no support for this argument, other than his claim that
IndyMac was closed on July 11, 2008, and sold on March 18, 2009.
There is no support for defendant's contention that the
endorsements on the note were forgeries, and the trial court did
not err in denying his motion to strike the note.

The Court also cannot find that defendant has identified a question
of material fact concerning plaintiff's standing and affirm the
trial court's grant of summary judgment in plaintiff's favor.

Finally, defendant argues that justice was not done because
plaintiff's purchase of the property was "deceptive and fraudulent"
because plaintiff had been "liquidated and dissolved" at the time
of the sale. However, Kernicky's affidavit explained that
plaintiff's Chapter 11 reorganization did not result in the
termination of its corporate existence; instead, the liquidation
plan "provide[d] for the monetization of the remaining assets of
[plaintiff's] bankruptcy estate for the benefit of [plaintiff's]
creditors." Thus, plaintiff's Chapter 11 proceedings did not
prevent plaintiff from proceeding with the foreclosure claim.
Accordingly, the Court cannot find that the trial court abused its
discretion in confirming the sale.

The Court concludes that the trial court did not err in permitting
plaintiff to amend the complaint, in denying defendant's motion to
strike the note, in granting summary judgment in plaintiff's favor,
or in confirming the sale.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion dated May 3, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2GGj5R2 from Leagle.com.

                       About Taylor Bean

Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. grew from a small
Ocala-based mortgage broker to become one of the largest mortgage
bankers in the United States.  In 2009, Taylor Bean was the
country's third largest direct-endorsement lender of FHA-insured
loans of the largest wholesale mortgage lenders and issuer of
mortgage backed securities.  It also managed a combined mortgage
servicing portfolio of approximately $80 billion.  The company
employed more than 2,000 people in offices located throughout the
United States.

Taylor Bean sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
09-07047) on Aug. 24, 2009.  Taylor Bean filed the Chapter 11
petition three weeks after federal investigators searched its
offices.  The day following the search, the Federal Housing
Administration, Ginnie Mae and Freddie Mac prohibited the company
from issuing new mortgages and terminated servicing rights. Taylor
Bean estimated more than $1 billion in both assets and liabilities
in its bankruptcy petition.

Lee Farkas, the former chairman, was sentenced in June to 30 years
in federal prison after being convicted on 14 counts of conspiracy
and bank, wire and securities fraud in what prosecutors said was a
$3 billion scheme involving fake mortgage assets.

Jeffrey W. Kelly, Esq., and J. David Dantzler, Jr., Esq., at
Troutman Sanders LLP, in Atlanta, Ga., and Russel M. Blain, Esq.,
and Edward J. Peterson, III, Esq., at Stichter, Riedel, Blain &
Prosser, PA, in Tampa, Fla., represent the Debtors.  Paul Steven
Singerman, Esq., and Arthur J. Spector, Esq., at Berger Singerman
PA, in Miami, Fla., represent the Committee.  BMC Group, Inc.,
serves as the claims and noticing agent.

Unsecured creditors were expected to receive 3.3% to 4.4% under a
Chapter 11 plan approved in July 2011.


TOP SHELV: Res Judicata Bars Claim Invalidating AG&I Lien
---------------------------------------------------------
Defendant Anthony Gushow & Sons, Inc., filed a Motion for Summary
Judgment claiming that the issues of the validity and priority of
liens raised by the Plaintiff, Top Shelv Worldwide, LLC in the
adversary proceeding captioned TOP SHELV WORLDWIDE, LLC, Plaintiff,
v. FOUR COURTS, INC., an Ontario Corporation, FARLEY MANUFACTURING,
INC., an Ontario Corporation, ANTHONY GUSHOW & SONS, INC., SUGAR
CONSTRUCTION, INC., DEWITT LUMBER COMPANY, UNITED RENTALS, INC.,
NORTHERN CONCRETE PIPE, INC., SEQUIN LUMBER COMPANY, INC., VALLEY
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., and ROBERT ANDERSON and NANCY
ANDERSON, Defendants, Adversary Proceeding Case No. 18-2005-dob
(Bankr. E.D. Mich.) have already been determined by the Bankruptcy
Court in a May 6, 2016 Order Confirming Debtor's First Amended
Combined Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement.

Top Shelv disagrees and argues that the doctrine of res judicata
does not apply. Because certain issues of validity and priority of
claims were previously determined by the Court, Bankruptcy Judge
Daniel S. Opperman grants Gushow's motion.

In the case of Sanders Confectionery Products, Inc. v. Heller
Financial, Inc., 973 F.2d 474 (6th Cir. 1992), the Sixth Circuit
Court of Appeals examined this issue and identified the four
elements of res judicata as:

   1. A final decision on the merits in the first action by a court
of competent jurisdiction;

   2. The second action involves the same parties, or their
privies, as the first;

   3. The second action raises an issue actually litigated or which
should have been litigated in the first action;

   4. An identity of the causes of action.

The Court concludes that Plaintiff Debtor's claim against Gushow to
invalidate Gushow's construction lien is barred by res judicata.
The Court analyzes this case under the Sanders factors, noting that
the Sanders case involved facts not as straightforward as the
instant case in that Sanders involved the parent of the debtor and
creditors of the debtor, but this case involves the same Debtor and
its creditors. First, it is undisputed that a Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization is a final judgment, so the Order Confirming the
2016 Plan is a final judgment. Second, this second case involves
the exact same parties--Top Shelv and Gushow, along with the other
creditor Defendants. Third, the instant action involves the exact
same issue as what was actually litigated and determined in the
confirmed plan in the first case. Upon the stipulation of the
parties, the Court confirmed the 2016 Plan which held that Gushow's
claim was secured with its lien preserved. The facts that support
Gushow's claim in 2016 are the same as the instant case and the
defenses to that claim existed in 2016, but were not raised in the
form of an objection. No new facts, defenses, or change in the law
exist in the instant case that did not exist in the prior case.
Fourth, the claim of Gushow in the previous case and this case as
between it and Top Shelv are identical. The facts and evidence in
existence on the date of confirmation of the 2016 Plan remain
unchanged.

Top Shelv argues that since serial Chapter 11 cases are allowed, a
previous Chapter 11 plan cannot be given res judicata effect. While
the straightforward logic of Top Shelv's argument is compelling,
nuances of Chapter 11 dictate a rejection of Top Shelv's position.
First, the change that brought Top Shelv back to this Court as a
Chapter 11 Debtor is its lack of financial performance for reasons
both within and beyond its control. Top Shelv requests a reset of
its financial obligations, which it is entitled because of stiffer
economic conditions which in turn impact the value of its main
asset, the sports dome facility. Top Shelv on one hand and the
secured creditors on the other hand now face an unhappy financial
situation--the value of the sports dome facility is not sufficient
to pay all secured creditors in full. It is this change--the
economics of Top Shelv--that is the factor in this case that allows
Top Shelv to have a second chance to reorganize. In the 2016 Plan,
all parties agreed that the value of the sports dome facility was
sufficient to pay all secured creditors. But that is not true today
because the value of the facility has dropped. The issue of whether
a particular creditor has a valid lien was decided in the 2016 Plan
and cannot be revisited today because no fact has changed since the
2016 Plan as to these issues and the Debtor did not object to
Gushow's claim.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion dated May 1, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2kevYJg from Leagle.com.

Top Shelv Worldwide, LLC, Debtor In Possession, represented by
Edward J. Gudeman -- ejgudeman@gudemanlaw.com -- Gudeman &
Associates, P.C. & Brian Ashley Rookard, Gudeman & Associates,
P.C.

                     About Top Shelv Worldwide

Top Shelv Worldwide, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code for a second time (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No.
17-21434) on July 14, 2017.  Stanley Dulaney, its member, signed
the 2017 petition.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated
assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.

Judge Daniel S. Opperman presides over the case.  Edward J.
Gudeman, Esq., at Brian A. Rookard, Esq., at Gudeman and
Associates, P.C., serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed.

Top Shelv previously sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.
Mich. Case No. 15-21770) on Aug. 31, 2015.  A plan was confirmed
May 6, 2016.


TRIGEANT HOLDINGS: Renewed Bid for Stay Pending Appeal Nixed
------------------------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned TRIGEANT HOLDINGS, LTD., et al.,
Appellants, v. BTB REFINING, LLC, Appellee, Case No.
9:18-CV-80515-RLR (S.D. Fla.), District Judge Robin L. Rosenberg
entered an order denying appellant's renewed emergency motion for
stay pending appeal.

Upon review of the record, the Court agrees with the Bankruptcy
Court that Appellants have not met the high burden necessary to
warrant a stay pending appeal.

Appellants request that they be relieved of the requirement to post
a cash supersedeas bond. Courts have recognized two potential
exceptions to the general requirement of a supersedeas bond: (1)
where the defendant's ability to pay the judgment is so plain that
the cost of the bond would be a waste of money; and (2) where the
requirement would put the defendant's other creditors in undue
jeopardy." The alleviation of the bond requirement is an
extraordinary remedy that requires extraordinary circumstances to
justify. Appellants have not demonstrated any such extraordinary
circumstances here.

The Court construes Appellants' requests for relief as including a
request that the Court order Appellants' escrowed funds to be
withdrawn and deposited into the court registry as the
consideration for a supersedeas bond. A Chapter 11 plan is
effectively a contract between the debtor and its creditors.
Accordingly, a debtor, post-confirmation, is bound by the terms of
its confirmed plan, and is not free to use assets governed by the
plan, except as permitted by the plan. Here, Appellants' Plan
designated that $3.3 million held in a disputed claims reserve was
to be used, if necessary, to satisfy Appellants' indemnification
obligation.

There is nothing in the Plan, as confirmed by the confirmation
order, which authorizes the use of the disputed claims reserve
funds for a supersedeas bond. The Bankruptcy Court specifically
noted as much at the hearing on the Bankruptcy Stay Motion and
cautioned Appellants that the use of those funds to obtain a bond
would be sanctionable.

A full-text copy of the Court's Order dated May 2, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2s4kqw0 from Leagle.com.

Trigeant Holdings, Ltd., Trigeant, LLC & Trigeant, LTD.,
Appellants, represented by Jordi Guso -- jguso@bergersingerman.com
-- Berger Singerman & Paul A. Avron -- pavron@bergersingerman.com
-- Berger Singerman.

BTB Refining, LLC, Appellee, represented by Charles W.
Throckmorton, IV , Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton & David Lee
Rosendorf, Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton.

                    About Trigeant Holdings

Trigeant, owner of a Corpus Christi, Texas oil refinery, provides
fuel and asphalt products to the housing and transportation
industries.  The company is owned by Palm Beach, Florida
billionaire Harry Sargeant III and members of his family.

On Nov. 26, 2014, Trigeant filed its first bankruptcy In re
Trigeant Ltd., 13-38580.  The case was dismissed on April 1, 2014.

Trigeant Holdings, Ltd., and Trigeant, LLC, filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case Nos. 14-29027 and
14-29030, respectively) on Aug. 25, 2014, amid a dispute among
members of the Sargeant family.  Mr. Sargeant's two brothers,
Daniel and James, and his father, Harry Sargeant II, sent Trigeant
to bankruptcy to fend off Mr. Sargeant III's bid to seize control
of the company's primary asset.  The family says Mr. Sargeant III,
who has a $22 million lien against the plant through a company he
controls called BTB Refining LLC, is attempting to prevent the
refinery from operating in an effort to lower its value and obtain
ownership of it.

Trigeant Holdings estimated both assets and liabilities of $50
million to $100 million.

Berger Singerman LLP serves as the Debtors' counsel.

The Bankruptcy Court set the general claims bar date as Oct. 17,
2014, and March 31, 2015, as the deadline by which governmental
entities must file proofs of claims.

The Debtors filed on Sept. 16, 2014, their Joint Plan of
Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.  The Plan
is premised on the sale of substantially all of the Debtors' assets
to Gravity Midstream Corpus Christi, LLC.  The Plan provides that
holders of Allowed Claims will be paid in full, in cash.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 has not appointed a committee of
unsecured creditors.

                        *     *     *

Trigeant Holdings, Ltd., et al., notified the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Florida that the Effective Date of
their Third Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization occurred on June
5, 2015.


WALL STREET THEATER: Needs Time to Resolve Tax Credit Disbursements
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wall Street Theater Company, Inc. and its affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut to extend for 90
days the periods in which only Debtors may file a plan of
reorganization and solicit and obtain acceptances with respect to
such plan through and including Sept. 4, 2018 and Nov. 1, 2018,
respectively.

The Debtors relate that they have expended significant time,
energy, and financial resources in managing the numerous hurdles
that have presented themselves in the nascent stages of their
bankruptcy cases, but still have a number of significant obstacles
impeding their success in these proceedings. Thus, the Debtors
require additional time to enable them to enter into a position to
engage in negotiations with major creditor constituencies regarding
the terms of a plan.

Although the bankruptcy issues presented by Debtors' cases are
routine overall, the Debtors assert that the corporate structure
and background concerning Debtors' receipt of various tax credits
is incredibly complex and has presented unique circumstances and
hurdles for Debtors to overcome. The Debtors tell the Court that
the repeated theme through these cases has been the fact that,
without receipt of significant income in the form of tax credits,
Debtors' bankruptcy cases will fail. As such, Debtors have, of
necessity, had to focus time and efforts towards resolving certain
disputes related to various prerequisites for the sought-after tax
credit disbursements.

The Debtors mention that the key step towards reorganization was
the commencement an adversary proceeding Wall Street Theater
Company, Inc., et al v. GTL Construction, LLC et al, Adv. Pro. No.
18-05023 ("506 Action"), on May 10, 2018 in order to determine the
fair market value of the Property and strip liens that are not
supported by equity in the Property.

The Debtors have also spent a substantial amount of time and effort
in providing information to their creditors concerning their assets
and liabilities and clearly explaining their corporate structure.
Going forward, the Debtors intend to meet with their secured
lender, Patriot Bank, N.A. and other parties-in-interest over the
next month in order to evaluate their input in preparing Debtors’
plan of reorganization.

Further, the Debtors contend that they have retained and worked
closely with R.J. Reuter, LLC as their financial advisor to file
timely and accurate Monthly Operating Reports and begin evaluating
strategies for exit financing.

Additionally, the Debtors have worked tirelessly to continue to
promote the theater's business and book performers in order to
ensure that the theater sustains and improves customer patronage
going forward. In sum, Debtors have made good faith progress toward
reorganization.

Because the 506 Action was only recently filed, the Debtors claim
that an unresolved contingency exists with respect to the treatment
of certain claims. While Debtors do not anticipate waiting until
the conclusion of the 506 Action to propose a plan of
reorganization, the Debtors aver that an extension of the
exclusivity period will allow Debtors to be in a better position to
evaluate which parties intend to oppose and/or challenge the 506
Action, and will provide more certainty for the Debtors in
negotiating with their creditor body.

                   About The Wall Street Theater

The Wall Street Theater, listed in the National Register of
Historic Places, has re-emerged as a 501c3 non-profit organization,
whose mission is to provide diverse programming and promote arts
education, thereby enriching the cultural life of the greater
Norwalk community.  The Wall Street Theater --
https://www.wallstreettheater.com/ -- adopts its moniker from its
location and its mission from its history, combining live shows,
interactive entertainment, cinema, digital production, art space
and a community arena in which to play.  

Wall Street Theater Company, Inc., and affiliates Wall Street
Master Landlord, LLC and Wall Street Managing Member, LLC, filed
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Conn. Lead Case No. 18-50132) on
Feb. 4, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Suzanne Cahill, president, the WS
Theater Company and WS Master Landlord estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities
while WS Managing Member estimated less than $50,000 in assets and
$10 million to $50 million in liabilities.

Judge Julie A. Manning is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Green & Sklarz, LLC, as legal counsel; R.J.
Reuter, LLC as financial advisor; Wellspeak, Dugas & Kane, LLC as
real estate appraiser and consultant; and CohnReznick as auditor.


WESTMORELAND COAL: Repays in Full All Outstanding Loan with CIBC
----------------------------------------------------------------
In connection with certain financing transactions of Westmoreland
Coal Company, on May 21, 2018, the Company repaid in full all of
its outstanding obligations and terminated the Company's Second
Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of Dec.
16, 2014, among Westmoreland Coal Company, as borrower, the
lenders, and the CIBC Bank USA (f/k/a PrivateBank and Trust
Company), as administrative agent.  The Revolving Loan Agreement
was to mature on Dec. 31, 2018.  The Company paid an early
termination fee of one-half of one percent (0.50%) of the aggregate
maximum loan amount under the Revolving Loan Agreement, as
disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

                    About Westmoreland Coal

Based in Englewood, Colorado, Westmoreland Coal Company --
http://www.westmoreland.com/-- is an independent coal company
based in the United States.  The Company produces and sells thermal
coal primarily to investment grade utility customers under
long-term, cost-protected contracts.  Its focus is primarily on
mine locations which allow it to employ dragline surface mining
methods and take advantage of close customer proximity through
mine-mouth power plants and strategically located rail
transportation.  At Dec. 31, 2017, the Company's U.S. coal
operations were located in Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, Texas,
New Mexico and Ohio, and its Canadian coal operations were located
in Alberta and Saskatchewan.  The Company sold 49.7 million tons of
coal in 2017.

Westmoreland Coal reported a net loss applicable to common
shareholders of $71.34 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, a
net loss applicable to common shareholders of $27.10 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, and a net loss applicable to common
stockholders of $213.64 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.
As of March 31, 2018, Westmoreland Coal had $1.63 billion in total
assets, $2.12 billion in total liabilities and a total deficit of
$489.67 million.

The audit opinion included in the company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017 contains a going concern
explanatory paragraph.  Ernst & Young LLP stated that the Company
has a substantial amount of long-term debt outstanding, is subject
to declining industry conditions that are negatively impacting the
Company's financial position, results of operations, and cash
flows, and has stated that substantial doubt exists about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

                          *     *     *

In April 2018, Moody's Investors Service downgraded the ratings of
Westmoreland Coal Company, including its corporate family rating
(CFR) to 'Caa3' from 'Caa1'.  According to Moody's, the downgrade
reflects the company's weak liquidity position, due to the
near-term maturity of its term loan.

In March 2018, S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating
on Westmoreland Coal Co. to 'CCC-' from 'CCC' and placed all of its
ratings on the company on CreditWatch with negative implications.
"The rating downgrade reflects our view that Westmoreland Coal Co.
(WLB) could breach its fixed charge coverage in the next three to
six months.  This would cause a cross default with its term loan
and senior notes that would become immediately due.  Westmoreland
has a $321 million term loan that matures in December 2020, and
$350 million of senior secured notes that mature in January 2022,"
S&P said, according to a TCR report dated March 13, 2018.


WILMINGTON VICTORVILLE: Hires Levene Neale as Bankruptcy Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Wilmington Victorville, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Los
Angeles Division, to hire Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP,
as bankruptcy counsel, effective as of May 5, 2018.

Services LNBYB will render are:

     a. advise the Debtor with regard to the requirements of the
Bankruptcy Court, Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules and the Office
of the United STates Trustee as they pertain to the Debtor;

     b. advise the Debtor with regard to certain rights and
remedies of the Debtor's bankruptcy estate and the rights, claims
and interests of creditors;

     c. represent the Debtor in any proceeding or hearing in the
Bankruptcy Court involving the Debtor's bankruptcy estate unless
the Debtor is represented in such proceeding or hearing by other
special counsel;

     d. conduct exminations of witnesses, claimants or adverse
parties and represent the Debtor in any adversary proceeding except
to the extent that any such adversary proceeding is in an area
outside of LNBYB's expertise or which is beyond LNBYB's staffing
capabilities;

     e. prepare and assist the Debtor in the preparation of
reports, applications, pleadings and orders including, but not
limited to, applications to employ professional, interim statements
and operating reports, initial filing requirements, schedules and
statement of financial affairs, lease pleadings, cash collateral,
financial pleadings and pleadings with respect to the Debtor's use,
sale or lease of property outside the ordinary course of business;

     f. represent the Debtor with regard to obtaining use of
debtor-in-possession financing and/or cash collateral including,
but no limited to, negotiating and seeking Bankruptcy Court
approval if any debtor in possession financing and/or cash
collateral;

     g. assist the Debtor in its asset sale process;

     h. assist the Debtor in the negotiation, formulation,
preparation and confirmation of a plan of reorganization and the
preparation and approval of a disclosure statement in respect of
the plan; and

     i. perform any other services which may be appropriate in
LNBYB's representation of the Debtor during the Debtor's bankruptcy
case.

Philip A. Gasteir, Esq., a partner at the firm, attests that LNBYB
is a "disinterested person" as defined by 11 U.S.C. Section 101(14)
and it has no connection with the Applicant's creditors, or any
other party.

LNBYB's 2018 rates are:

     David W. Levene              $595
     David L. Neale               $595
     Ron Bender                   $595
     Martin J. Brill              $595
     Timothy J. Yoo               $595
     Gary E. Klausner             $595
     Edward M. Wolkowitz          $595
     David B. Golubchik           $595
     Beth Ann R. Young           $580
     Monica Y. Kim           $580
     Daniel H. Reiss           $580
     Irving M. Gross           $580
     Philip A. Gasteier           $580
     Eve H. Karasik               $580
     Todd A. Frealy               $580
     Kurt Ramlo                   $580
     Jacqueline L. Rodriguez      $565
     Juliet Y. Oh                 $565
     Todd M. Arnold               $565
     Carmela T. Pagay             $565
     Anthony A. Freidman          $565
     Krikor J . Meshefejian       $565
     John-Patrick M. Fritz        $565
     Lindsey L. Smith             $495
     Jeffrey Kwong                $425
     Paraprofessionals            $250
   
The counsel can be reached through:

     Philip A. Gasteier, Esq.
     Monica Y. Kim, Esq.
     Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP
     10250 Constellation Blvd #1700
     Los Angeles, CA 90067
     Phone: 310-229-1234
     Fax: 310-229-1244
     E-mail: pag@lnbyb.com
             myk@lnb.com

                About Wilmington Victorville

Wilmington Victorville, LLC, listed its business as Single Asset
Real Estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)) whose
principal assets are located at 16120 Bear Valley Road Victorville,
CA 92395.

Wilmington Victorville filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 18-15216) on May 15, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Myong Oc Kang, manager, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50
million in both assets and liabilities.

The case is assigned to the Hon. Deborah J. Saltzman.

Philip A. Gasteier, Esq., and Monica Y. Kim, Esq., at Levene,
Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP, serve as the Debtor's counsel.


ZIP STEVENSON: Seeks Approval of Cash Collateral Stipulation
------------------------------------------------------------
Zip Stevenson, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Central District of California of the Stipulation entered
into between Debtor and Secured Creditors: Grand View Holdings, LLC
and Trembling Giant, LLC, which authorizes Debtor's use of cash
collateral through July 31, 2018.

A hearing on the Cash Collateral Motion will be held on June 5,
2018 at 11:00 a.m.

Zip Stevenson owns two real property parcels which are the subject
of this Motion, 2240 Ambrose Terrace, Los Angeles, California and
1652 South Curson Avenue, Los Angeles, California. The Ambrose
Property is a single family residence, rented to a tenant. The
Curson Property is a residential duplex, each unit rented to a
tenant. The Debtor has first position deeds of trust against the
Ambrose and Curson properties held by Grand View Holdings and
second position deeds of trust against the Ambrose and Curson
properties held by Trembling Giant.

The Debtor requires use of the rental income generated by the
Ambrose Property and the Curson Property to service the secured
debt commitments to Grand View and Trembling Giant, as well as a
required impound account, and to further fund insurance and
property tax obligations as necessary.

Monthly payments due to Grand View under the New Modified Note, and
pursuant to the Grand View Deed of Trust and Assignment of Rents,
are calculated at approximately $7,532 as of the Petition Date. The
Grand View Deed of Trust was granted in the original principal
amount of $500,000.

The Debtor entered into a promissory note secured by a deed of
trust on real property commonly known as 1501 W. Washington Blvd.,
Los Angeles, California 90007 with Granville Park, LLC in the
principal amount of $3,500,000. Subsequently, Granville Park
assigned its interest in the Guaranty Deed of Trust to Trembling
Giant.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor was collecting rental income
from the Curson Property in the approximate monthly amount of
$6,319, and from the Ambrose Property in the approximate amount of
$4,176 for a total of approximately $10,495.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Ambrose Rental Income was being
paid by the tenant's direct deposit to Grand View, into an account
controlled by Grand View. The post-petition Ambrose Rental Income
for March, April and May, have already been paid by the tenant's
direct deposit to Grand View, into an account controlled by Grand
View.

Prepetition, one tenant of Curson was paying their portion of the
Curson Rental Income in the amount of $3,347, directly to Grand
View with post-dated checks. Postpetition, Grand View has already
negotiated the March, April and May portion of the Curson Rental
Income from the tenant's post-dated checks.

Going forward, the Debtor intends to collect all Combined Rental
Income from the tenants directly and deposit the Combined Rental
Income into a segregated Curson/Ambrose Debtor-In-Possession
account.

Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation, the Debtor will be entitled
to use the cash collateral in accordance with the following terms:

     (a) The Debtor will tender regular monthly payments to Grand
View in the amount of the Grand View in the amount of the Grand
View Monthly Payment, which is calculated at $7,532 for the amount
Grand View Secured Claim.

     (b) The Debtor will tender regular monthly payments to
Trembling Giant c/o Law Offices of Shai Oved in the amount of
$1,500 against the Guaranty Deed of Trust.

     (c) The Debtor will retain balance of the March and April
Combined Rental Income in the segregated DIP account in order to
fund the required property taxes.

     (d) Grand View will pay the required April 2018 installment of
the Debtor's Los Angeles County Property tax installment for the
Curson Property and Ambrose Property from its Impound Account.

     (e) If the Impound Account is short of funds to make such
Property Tax installment, Grand View will inform Debtor of the
shortfall, and Debtor will provide Grand View with sufficient
additional funds for such payment from the Cash Collateral
Balance.

     (f) Beginning May 2018, the Debtor will retain the balance of
the Cash Collateral Combined Rental Income in the approximate
amount of $1,463 per month to be added to the Cash Collateral
Balance.  However, if the Debtor is required to incur additional
costs to maintain or protect the Ambrose and/or Curson Properties,
the Debtor may use a portion of the Cash Collateral Balance with
the written consent of both Grand View and Trembling Giant.

     (g) Provided the payments to Grand View are current, one-half
of the Cash Collateral Balance will be distributed to Trembling
Giant at the end of each calendar quarter thereafter.

     (h)Trembling Giant may accept any and all payments made
pursuant to the Stipulation without prejudice or waiver of any
rights and remedies to which Trembling Giant would otherwise be
entitle under applicable non-bankruptcy law.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-11307-33.pdf

                    About Zip Stevenson LLC

Zip Stevenson, LLC, a lessor of real estate, filed as a domestic
corporation in the State of California on March 1, 2002.

Zip Stevenson sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-11307) on Feb. 6, 2018.  In its
petition signed by Zip Stevenson, managing member, the Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.
Judge Vincent P. Zurzolo presides over the case.


[*] $308,956 in Defaulted Timeshare Loans Up for Auction on June 7
------------------------------------------------------------------
Orange Lake Country Club, Inc., as sub-servicer of certain
defaulted timeshare loans, will sell at public auction the
defaulted loans in bulk.  The outstanding principal balance of the
loans comprising the Property is approximately $308,957.

The Auction is set for June 7, 2018, commencing at 10:00 am at the
lobby of 1201 Elm Street, Suite 4600, Dallas, Texas 75270.

A minimum bid amount will be required and such amount will be
announced to interested parties 30 minutes prior to the Auction. It
is anticipated that the minimum bid amount will exceed
$301,619.64.

The Property will be conveyed via allonge(s) and one or more
unrecorded collateral assignment of mortgages/deeds of trust
without warranties of any kind and without title insurance.  To
qualify to bid, an interested party must 30 minutes prior to the
Auction provide evidence satisfactory to the Sub-servicer of its
ability to within 1 hour of the Auction produce cash or a cashier's
check in an amount exceeding the Estimated Minimum Purchase Price.


Information regarding the Property will be made available to
qualified bidders prior to the commencement of the Auction, and
such information will relate to the performance of the entirety of
the loan portfolio comprising the Property rather than information
regarding individual loans.  The Sub-Servicer may withdraw one or
more, or all, of the loans comprising the Property at any time
through and including the time of the Auction.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2018.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***