/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/180727.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Friday, July 27, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 207

                            Headlines

21ST CENTURY: Bankruptcy Court Dismisses Anti-Kickback Suit
4 WEST: PCO Files 2nd Report
417 RENTALS: Springfield City Opposes Bid for Leave to Amend Plan
4411 ENGLE RIDGE: May Use Up To $1,800 Cash Collateral Per Month
ABC FAMILY DENTAL: Unsecureds to be Paid $1,500 Monthly for 5 Years

ADVANCE WATCH: Trustee Wins Bid for Default Judgments in Suits
AIX ENERGY: Louisiana Court Amends May 23 Judgment
ANCHOR REEF: Aug. 9 Plan Confirmation Hearing
APPLESPRINGS INC: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
APPLOVIN CORP: Moody's Assigns B1 CFR & Rates $870MM Loans B1

ARA MACAO: Committee Taps Engelman Berger as Legal Counsel
BADGER MERGER: Moody's Gives B3 CFR & Rates 1st Lien Loans B2
BAILEY RIDGE: Court Awards $66K to Committee Counsel
BAY CIRCLE: Post-petition Operational Income to Pay All Claims
BEDFORD PROPERTIES: Seeks Authority to Use Cash Collateral

BRANDENBURG FAMILY: Gates Buying Maugansville Property for $170K
BRANDENBURG FAMILY: Gates Buying Maugansville Property for $177K
C.R. OF ATTALLA: Wants to Hire McNair McLemore as Accountants
CANUSO AT AURA: Taps Ciardi Ciardi as Bankruptcy Counsel
CCS ONCOLOGY: May Use Cash Collateral Pursuant to 13th Order

CD HALL: Authorized to Use Cash Collateral on Final Basis
CENTURY TOWNHOMES: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
CHANDLER HEALTH: Taps McNair McLemore as Accountants
CLINTON NURSERIES: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended to Aug. 1
COMPCARE MEDICAL: IRS Cash Collateral Stipulation Approved

CORBETT-FRAME: Unsecureds Projected to Recover 16.2% Under New Plan
COSI INC: R. Dourney Not Entitled to Administrative Claim, Ct. Says
CRACKLE INTERMEDIATE: S&P Assigns 'B' ICR, Outlook Stable
CUBIC ENERGY: C. Wallen, FOI Bid for Ch. 11 Plan Enforcement Nixed
CURTIS JAMES JACKSON: GSO Breach of Duty Claim vs Neligan Tossed

DAVID ROSS: Tenant Hauschild Buying Culver City Property for $1.2M
DESERT LAND: Wants to Hire Hutchison & Steffen as Special Counsel
EARL GAUDIO: Court Reduces Ice Miller, FMB Requested Fees
EAST ORANGE: District Court Affirms Sale Enforcement Order
EASTGATE PROFESSIONAL: Selling Cincinnati Property for $3M

EDEN HOME: PCO Files 2nd Interim Report
EMERALD GRANDE: Unsecureds to Recoup 100% Under Latest Plan
ENDURO RESOURCE: Taps Alvarez & Marsal as Restructuring Advisor
ENDURO RESOURCE: Taps Evercore Group as Financial Advisor
ENDURO RESOURCE: Taps Latham & Watkins as Legal Counsel

ENDURO RESOURCE: Taps Young Conaway as Co-Counsel
ESA ENVIRONMENTAL: Summary Judgment Ruling in Favor of F&D Upheld
FALLS AT GILBERT: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
FLOYD E. SQUIRES: Strombecks Buying Eureka Property for $500K
FM 544 PARK: Court Approves Trustee's Amended Plan Outline

FORASTERO INC: Capital Resource Buying Property for $9 Million
FRANKLIN ACQUISITIONS: Trustee Selling El Paso Property for $151K
FRANKLIN ACQUISITIONS: Trustee Selling El Paso Property for $965K
FSA INC: Administrative Claims to be Paid in Full on Effective Date
FYBOWIN LLC: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee

GARRETT PROPERTIES: Aug. 8 Plan Confirmation Hearing
GATEWAY BUICK: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
GLADYS LIMA: FDOT Buying Interest in Homestead Property for $110K
GORDON OAKS: Wants to Hire McNair McLemore as Accountants
HEARTLAND CARE: PCO Files Report

HEAVENLY COUTURE: Committee Taps Fox Rothschild as Legal Counsel
HOPE INDUSTRIES: Affiliates Commit $14.5K Monthly to Help Fund Plan
HORNE EXCAVATING: Seeks Approval of Cash Collateral Stipulation
HOTI ENTERPRISES: 2nd Cir. Upholds Dismissal of Suit vs Law Firms
ILLINI KIDS: Unsecureds to Receive 100% Distribution with Interest

INDIANA HOTEL: Cases vs IAA Remanded to State Court
INLAND OASIS GROUP: Unsecureds to be Paid in Full Under Latest Plan
INTEGRAL INVESTMENTS: Case Summary & 10 Unsecured Creditors
ITM ENTERPRISES: Aug. 8 Plan and Disclosure Statement Hearing
JULIAN DEPOT: Bid to Transfer Suit vs Home Depot to NY Court Nixed

JXB 84 LLC: Must Substantiate Alleged Cash Collateral Discrepancies
KAHLON ENTERPRISES: 4911 Buckeye Buying Emmaus Properties for $1.8M
KAMA MANAGEMENT: Plan and Disclosures Hearing Set for Aug. 29
KENNEWICK PUBLIC: PCO Files 6th Interim Report
KII LIQUIDATING: Court Junks Committee Suit vs Victory Park, et al.

LAUNCH SPORT: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
LIGHTSTONE GENERATION: Moody's Affirms Ba3 Rating on Secured Loans
LITTLE SAIGON: Litigation Trustee Taps CohnReznick as Accountant
LUCKY DRAGON: Plan Discloses Possible End of Hotel Operations
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS: Moody's Gives Ba3 CFR & Rates Term Loan Ba2

MANUS SUDDRETH: Trustee Selling Real Properties for $4.5M
MARQUIS DIAGNOSTIC: Physician Group Buying All Assets for $6M
MEHRI AKHLAGHPOUR: Bid to Stay Sale of Real Properties Junked
MESABI METALLICS: Court Upholds Ruling in Cliff's Land Dispute
METCOM NETWORK: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation

METROPOLITAN DIAGNOSTIC: 8th Interim Cash Collateral Order Entered
MILTON ZACHARSKI: Denial of J. Balsamo Claims vs J. Zorzit Upheld
MOHAJER12 CORP: Taps Friedman Poole as Attorneys
MONIKA AREFI: California Court Dismisses Suit vs JP Morgan, et al.
MUNN WORKS: Seeks Permission for Interim Use of Cash Collateral

NATIONAL MANAGEMENT: Taps Bederson LLP as Accountant
NATIONAL ORTHOPEDICS: Unsecureds to Get $15K Quarterly Over 3 Years
NEIGHBORS INVESTMENTS: Kansas Ct. to Handle Suit vs D. Baumgartner
NEW CITY HISTORIC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
NICHOLS BROTHERS: Joe Verebelyi Leaves Creditors' Committee

NN INC: S&P Lowers Corp Credit Rating to 'B', Outlook Stable
NORTHWEST TERRITORIAL: Trustee Selling Remaining Property
OMAR A. DUWAIK: 10th Cir. Affirms Denial of Injunction Bid vs Chase
ORION HEALTHCORP: Governmental Bar Date Set for Sept. 12
ORION HEALTHCORP: HealthTek Solutions Named Successful Bidder

ORION HEALTHCORP: Kelly Opposes Contracts Assignment in NYNM Sale
ORION HEALTHCORP: Sec. 341 for NYNM Creditors Set for Aug. 3
OSUM PRODUCTION: S&P Affirms 'CCC+' ICR, Outlook Stable
PAUL LEONARD BRUNO: Court Junks Injunction Bid vs C. Potts, et al.
PEGASUS VIP: Taps Exezidis & Associates as Special Counsel

PES HOLDINGS: Seeks Approval for New Intermediation Facility
PHOENIX HELIPARTS: Court Narrows Claims in Third-Party Suit
PHONES PLUS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
PLACE FOR ACHIEVING: PCO Files 2nd Report
PREMISE HEALTH: Moody's Assigns B3 CFR, Outlook Stable

PREMISE HEALTH: S&P Assigns B Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
PUGLIA ENGINEERING: Taps Larson Gross as Accountant
RELATIVITY MEDIA: Not Allowed to Retain Winston & Strawn as Counsel
REMODELING SERVICES: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ROLLING HILLS: Seeks Authority for Further Cash Collateral Use

ROTHROCK FAMILY: Kolofia Buying Tucson Property for $715K
ROTINI INC: Court Directs DOJ Watchdog to Appoint Ch. 11 Trustee
SAMMY ELJAMAL: J. Weil, et al.'s Bid for Leave to Appeal Junked
SERVICE WELDING: Clawson Tank Buying Personal Property for $15K
SHAHRIAR ZARGAR: B. Shadsirat Suit Remanded to Superior Court

SKY-SCAN INC: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral Through October 5
SOAR INTO YOUR DESTINY: 3rd Interim Cash Collateral Order Entered
SOURCINGPARTNER INC: May Use Cash Collateral on Final Basis
SPA 810: Committee Taps Tiffany & Bosco as Legal Counsel
SPRUHA SHAH: July 31 Hearing on Disclosure Statement

STEPHEN D. MCCORMICK: Starion Entitled to $83K in Atty's Fees
STEVE PATTERSON: To Pay Unsecured Creditors 50% of Allowed Claims
STOLLINGS TRUCKING: Sept. 12 Amended Plan Outline Hearing
SUNBURST FARMS: Court Denies Bid for Chapter 11 Trustee
SUPERIOR BOILER: Selling Bell Gardens Property for $1.4 Million

SUPERIOR ENERGY: Moody's Hikes CFR to B1 & Sr. Unsec. Notes to B2
SUPERIOR HOME: PCO Files 2nd Report
SUZANNE ALESHIRE: Dist. Court Affirms Dismissal of Ch. 11 Petition
TINTRI INC: L. Tuller Suit Stayed Pending Resolution of Ch. 11 Case
TITAN INTERNATIONAL: S&P Alters Outlook to Pos. & Affirms 'B-' ICR

TOMMIE LINGENFELTER: Selling New Smyrna Beach Condo Unit for $250K
TXP CORP: Richard ISD Wins Lawsuit vs Asymblix
VENTURE INVESTMENTS: Wants Immediate OK on Cash Collateral Use
VERIFONE SYSTEMS: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B', Outlook Stable
VERN'S AUTO: Plan Outline Approved; August 8 Plan Hearing

VITAMIN WORLD: Optium Buying Visa/MC Claims for $230K
WEINSTEIN COMPANY: Closes Asset Sale to Lantern Entertainment
WM DISTRIBUTION: S. Jesmer Not Entitled to $600K Additional Payment
YORAVI INVESTMENT: Plan Discloses Adequate Protection Payment to RM
[^] BOOK REVIEW: Oil Business in Latin America: The Early Years


                            *********

21ST CENTURY: Bankruptcy Court Dismisses Anti-Kickback Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Robert D. Drain issued a modified bench ruling
granting  21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. and affiliates'
motion and dismissing the adversary proceeding captioned UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. DAVID DI PIETRO, Plaintiff, v. 21st
CENTURY ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC., 21st CENTURY ONCOLOGY, INC., and
21st century oncology, llc, Defendants, Adv. P. No. 17-08284(RDD)
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y.).

On May 25, 2018 the Court issued a bench ruling on the portion of
the reorganized debtors/defendants'  motion for an order dismissing
this adversary proceeding that the Court had not previously granted
in its prior bench ruling on January 30, 2018. The Court is filing
the modified bench ruling to correct and improve on the syntax and
structure of the May 25, 2018 oral ruling, the result of which has
already been memorialized by an order dated June 4, 2018 granting
the motion to dismiss in full.

The Plaintiff's remaining claims are based on the Debtors' alleged
violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. section
1320a-7b, as a basis for the complaint's False Claims Act claims.
As with the complaint's False Claims Act allegations based on the
Stark Law, claims would arise under the False Claims Act if the
Debtors violated the Anti-Kickback Statute and then, as the
complaint alleges, failed to disclose such violations in their
certifications to the United States in connection with enrolling in
and billing for Government-reimbursed health programs.

The motion to dismiss contends that the complaint's False Claims
Act claims based on violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute fail
because the Plaintiff does not satisfy 31 U.S.C. section
3730(e)(4)(A) and (B) in that, as alleged by the Debtors, the crux
of those Anti-Kickback Statute claims was publicly disclosed by
other sources before the Plaintiff shared them with the Government
and the Plaintiff lacks knowledge that is independent of and
materially and timely added to such publicly disclosed
allegations.

Having reviewed the parties' post-hearing briefs and considered all
of the pleadings filed in connection with the motion to dismiss, as
well as the transcript of the January 30, 2018 hearing and the
complaint, the Court has determined to grant the remaining aspect
of the motion to dismiss.

The Court finds that there are three problems with the complaint's
allegations pertaining to the Anti-Kickback Statute. First, the
scope of the Debtors' lobbyist Bill Rubin's agency on behalf of the
Debtors, which -- given the Plaintiff's contemporaneous belief that
Rubin was the Debtors' lobbyist, the Plaintiff had the opportunity
to explore but did not -- is not described with sufficient
particularity for purposes of Rule 9(b).). There is a clear
explanation for this failing: counsel for the Plaintiff has
acknowledged that she has no basis to know if the Debtors charged
Rubin with the assignment of offering valuable consideration to
Nask beyond what Governor Scott could already deliver or withhold
in return for his support.

Moreover, to the extent described in anything other than conclusory
terms, the complaint's assertions that Rubin was able to control
Governor Scott, Svengali-like, as opposed to exerting ordinary
political influence on him on behalf of a well-heeled client, are
not plausible, at least without additional detail confirming more
than ordinary political loyalties and the governor's exercise of
power under Florida law.

And it is only by properly pleading Rubin's role that the complaint
might overcome the gatekeeping requirement of section 3730(e)(4)(A)
and (B) of the False Claims Act, because the Debtors' influence,
though not specifically control, over Governor Scott was already
publicly disclosed in the "Florida Bulldog" articles that the
Debtors' motion to dismiss quotes and which I can take judicial
notice of. In fact, the Debtors' political influence, if not
control, over Florida's governor was the main focus of those
articles, which also disclose unusual, non-market features of the
Broward Contract (which also, they state, were previously publicly
disclosed in the Broward Health Board minutes and are available in
the Debtors' SEC filings).

As far as the complaint is concerned, therefore, Rubin is just the
mouthpiece for the Debtors' previously publicly disclosed political
influence, nothing more. Because the complaint does not assert
anything material beyond what was already publicly disclosed, it
thus runs afoul of section 3730(e)(4)(A) and (B) of the False
Claims Act. That is, the complaint's remaining Anti-Kickback
Statute allegations are, at their core, substantially the same as
previously published in the news media and the Board's minutes, and
the complaint does not evince a knowledge that is independent of
and materially added to those publicly-disclosed allegations or
transactions.

Accordingly, the remaining aspect of the motion to dismiss is
granted.

A full-text copy of the Court's Modified Bench Ruling dated July 9,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2mAiIzW from Leagle.com.

United States of America Ex Relator David Di Pietro, Plaintiff,
represented by Jonathan S. Pasternak, DelBello Donnellan Weingarten
Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP & Steven R. Schoenfeld, DelBello Donnellan
Weingarten et al.

21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Christopher Marcus -- christopher.marcus@kirkland.com -- Kirkland &
Ellis LLP & Steven R. Schoenfeld , DelBello Donnellan Weingarten et
al.

21st Century Oncology, Inc. & 21st Century Oncology, LLC,
Defendants, represented by Steven R. Schoenfeld, DelBello Donnellan
Weingarten et al.

                   About 21st Century

Fort Myers, Florida-based 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc.
(NYSEMKT:ICC), formerly Radiation Therapy Services Holdings, Inc.,
is a physician-led provider of integrated cancer care (ICC)
services.  It operates an integrated network of cancer treatment
centers and affiliated physicians in the world which, as of
December 31, 2015, deployed approximately 947 community-based
physicians in the fields of radiation oncology, medical oncology,
breast, gynecological, general surgery and urology.  As of December
31, 2015, the Company's physicians provided medical services at
approximately 375 locations, including over 181 radiation therapy
centers, of which 59 operated in partnership with health systems.
Its cancer treatment centers in the United States are operated
under the 21st Century Oncology brand.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, 2st Century had $1.05 billion in total
assets, $1.39 billion in total liabilities, $472.34 million in
series A convertible redeemable preferred stock, $19.24 million in
non-controlling interests -- redeemable and a total deficit of
$833.89 million.

21st Century and 59 U.S. affiliates filed Chapter 11 petitions
under the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-22770)
on May 25, 2017.  At the time of the filing, the Debtors estimated
their assets and debt at $1 billion to $10 billion.  The bankruptcy
cases are before the Hon. Judge Robert D. Drain.

Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at Morrison & Foerster LLP, serves as the
Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is
the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.

On June 8, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee has
tapped Morrison & Foerster LLP as counsel and Berkeley Research
Group, LLC, and financial advisor.


4 WEST: PCO Files 2nd Report
----------------------------
Melanie L. Cyganowski, Patient Care Ombudsman for 4 West Holdings,
Inc., et al., files a report on her visit to the following
facilities in South Carolina:

   a. Patewood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, located at 2
Griffith Road, Greenville, South Carolina 29607;

   b. Poinsett Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, located at 8
North Texas Avenue, Greenville, South Carolina 2961;

   c. Simpsonville Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, located at
807 South East Main Street, Simpsonville, South Carolina 29681;

   d. Greenville Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, located at
661 Rutherford Rd., Greenville, South Carolina 29609;

   e. Greer Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, located at 401
Chandler Rd., Greer, South Carolina 29651; and

   f. Brushy Creek Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, located at
101 Cottage Creek Circle, Greer, South Carolina 29650.

She also visited the following two facilities in Georgia:

   a. Macon Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, located at 505
Coliseum Drive, Macon, Georgia 31217; and

   b. Cobblestone Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, located at
101 Cobblestone Trace SE, Moultrie, Georgia 31788.

The PCO relates, "Mr. Robichaux spent extensive time speaking with
me early in the case, providing the history and background of the
Debtors.  In addition, Administrators and Senior Staff Teater,
Pollard, Addison, Mangrum, Baynard, Cottingham, Smallen, Sloan and
Woods did not hesitate to answer all my questions and engage in
candid conversations, educating me on the types of patients (e.g.,
short term, long term) their respective facilities cared for and
guiding me through their respective facilities.  It was apparent to
me that they all take a 'hands on' approach to their facility and
have a genuine interest in providing quality care to the patients
and surrounding communities and are intimately familiar with the
operations and personnel at their facility, greeting all of the
employees and patients by name and clearly being known in return.
All of the other personnel at the facilities I visited
weresimilarly informative and helpful to me in answering my
inquiries."

Notwithstanding the bankruptcy filing of these Cases, patient care
at the Debtors' facilities has not been impacted in any noticeable,
negative manner.  The Debtors' operations have been carried on in
seemingly normal fashion since the bankruptcy filings, due in large
measure to the efforts of its management, administrators and staff,
as well the Debtors' counsel and advisors, to minimize on all
fronts any ramifications from the bankruptcy filing on the patient
level.

A full-text copy of the PCO's Second Report is available for free
at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb18-30777-0762.0.pdf

                       About 4 West Holdings

4 West Holdings, Inc., et al. -- http://www.orianna.com/-- are
licensed operators of 41 skilled nursing facilities and manage on
skilled nursing facility located in seven states: Georgia, Indiana,
Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and
Virginia.  In addition, one of related entity, Palladium Hospice
and Palliative Care, LLC f/k/a Ark Hospice, LLC provides hospice
and palliative care services at certain of the Facilities and other
third party locations.  They employ approximately 5,000 people,
including but not limited to, nurses, nursing assistants, social
workers, regional directors and supervisors.

4 West Holdings, Inc., and 134 of its affiliates and subsidiaries
filed voluntary petitions in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas in Dallas seeking relief under the
provisions of Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Lead Case No. 18-30777) on March 6, 2018, with a restructuring
plan that contemplates the transfer of 22 facilities to new
operations.

The Debtors continue to operate their businesses and manage their
properties as debtors-in-possession.  4 West Holdings estimated $10
million to $50 million in assets and $50 million to $100 million in
liabilities as of the filing.

The Hon. Harlin DeWayne Hale is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped DLA Piper LLP (US) as bankruptcy counsel;
Houlihan Lokey as investment banker; Crowe Horwath LLP as financial
advisor; Ankura Consulting Group, LLC, as interim management
services provider; and Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy as claims
agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on March 19, 2018, appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee tapped
Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP as its legal counsel, and CohnReznick
LLP as its financial advisor.

William T. Neary, United States Trustee for Region 6, in accordance
the Agreed Order Directing the Appointment of a Patient Care
Ombudsman, appoints Melanie L. Cyganowski as the Patient Care
Ombudsman in these jointly administered chapter 11 cases of 4 West
Holdings, Inc. and its debtor-affiliates.


417 RENTALS: Springfield City Opposes Bid for Leave to Amend Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The City of Springfield, Missouri filed an objection to 417
Rentals, LLC's motion for leave to amend its plan of reorganization
and disclosure statement, and request for continuance of hearing.

Springfield takes issue with the assertion that "no prejudice will
occur" if the court allows more delay in this case. The prejudice
to Springfield is that the city will continue to pour more
resources into policing 417. The community will suffer from more
dangerous buildings, more nuisance conditions, more overgrowth, and
more property-maintenance violations.

To date, 417's operation demonstrates little understanding that the
organization has way too many properties, is laggard in maintaining
them, and its operations have cost the city dearly.

A full-text copy of Springfield's Objection is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/mowb17-60935-11-507.pdf

                      About 417 Rentals

Based in Brookline, Missouri, 417 Rentals, LLC, is a privately held
company in the real estate rental service industry.  417 Rentals
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
W.D. Mo. Case No. 17-60935) on Aug. 25, 2017.  Christopher Gatley,
its member, signed the petition.  At the time of the filing, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  Ronald S. Weiss, Esq., at Berman, DeLeve, Kuchan &
Chapman, LLC, serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  Joseph
Christopher Greene, Esq., is the Debtor's litigation counsel.


4411 ENGLE RIDGE: May Use Up To $1,800 Cash Collateral Per Month
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Phillip J. Shefferly of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Michigan authorized 4411 Engle Ridge Drive, LLC
to use up to $1,800 monthly of cash and accounts generated from
rents. The Debtor will pay Old National Bank $1,250 in monthly
adequate protection payments beginning June 1, 2018.

A copy of the Order is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb18-41983-73.pdf

                   About 4411 Engle Ridge Drive

4411 Engle Ridge Drive, LLC, is a single asset real estate case,
with its only asset being the real property and improvements
commonly known as 4411 Engle Ridge Drive, Fort Wayne, Indiana.  It
is a Michigan corporation formed on Aug. 20, 2013.

4411 Engle Ridge Drive filed a Chapter 11 voluntary petition
(Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 18-41983) on Feb. 16, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Jeffrey Wilkerson, manager, the Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities of less than $500,000.  The Hon. Phillip J.
Shefferly is assigned to the case.  The Debtor tapped Darnell PLLC
as its legal counsel.


ABC FAMILY DENTAL: Unsecureds to be Paid $1,500 Monthly for 5 Years
-------------------------------------------------------------------
ABC Neighborhood Dental & Orthodontics, P.C. d/b/a ABC Family
Dental & Orthodontics, filed a disclosure statement to accompany
its plan of reorganization dated July 2, 2018.

Under the plan, Class 7 general unsecured claimants will receive a
pro-rata distribution of $1,500 per month for period of five years,
less the amount necessary to pay any Unclassified Priority Claimant
who agrees to accept deferred payment of its claim. Beginning the
first full month following the Confirmation Date, the Debtor will
set aside $1,500 in a segregated account. Each time three months
payments have been set aside, the Debtor will make any payment due
to Unclassified Priority Claimants and then the Class 7
Distribution will be made to Class 7 creditors on a pro-rata basis.


The Debtor intends to object to the claims of SNAP Advances and
National Funding, Inc. If the claims of SNAP Advances and National
Funding are disallowed, the total amount of allowed Class 7 claims
will be approximately $576,375.44, and Class 7 claimants will
receive approximately 15.6% of their allowed claims over five
years. If the claims are allowed in full, the total amount of
allowed Class 7 claims will be approximately $843,688.62, and Class
7 claimants will receive approximately 10.7% of their allowed
claims over five years.

Pursuant to the Plan, the Debtor will restructure its debts and
obligations and ABC
Dental will continue to operate in the ordinary course of business.
Funding for the Plan will be from income derived from ABC
Dental’s ongoing operations. Dr. Michael Shifman will continue as
the President of ABC Dental.

The Debtor's Plan is feasible. The Debtor has been operating since
2013, and prior to the embezzlement that occurred in 2017, was able
to consistently meet its obligations in a timely fashion while
generating positive net revenue. In 2016, the Debtor was able to
generate approximately $882,000 in gross revenue, and approximately
$157,000 in net revenue. With the former managers removed, the
Debtor will once again be able to focus on growing its operations
and generating revenue with which to fund the Plan. The Debtor
anticipates that its income will be positive each year of the Plan,
and will generate sufficient revenue to meet its obligations under
the plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob17-21637-121.pdf

       About ABC Neighborhood Dental & Orthodontics P.C.

ABC Neighborhood Dental & Orthodontics, P.C., is a dental clinic
located at 1250 S Buckley Road, Aurora, Colorado.  The company's
gross revenue amounted to $938,213 in 2016 and $882,106 in 2015.
ABC Family Dental is 100% owned by Michael Shifman.

ABC Neighborhood sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 17-21637) on Dec. 26,
2017.  Michael Shifman, its owner, signed the petition.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $92,521 in assets and
$1.21 million in liabilities.  Judge Kimberley H. Tyson presides
over the case.  

The Debtor hired Kutner Brinen, P.C., as its bankruptcy counsel,
and Hristopoulos & Company, P.C., as its accountant.


ADVANCE WATCH: Trustee Wins Bid for Default Judgments in Suits
--------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Kravitz, as Creditor Trustee of the Creditor Trust of Advance
Watch Company Ltd., filed three motions for entry of default
judgments in three adversary proceedings captioned PETER KRAVITZ,
as Creditor Trustee of the Creditor Trust of Advance Watch Company,
Ltd., Plaintiff, v. DEACONS, Defendant. PETER KRAVITZ, as Creditor
Trustee of the Creditor Trust of Advance Watch Company, Ltd.,
Plaintiff, v. WHEELER CORPORATION LTD., Defendant. PETER KRAVITZ,
as Creditor Trustee of the Creditor Trust of Advance Watch Company,
Ltd., Plaintiff, v. DISPLAY & PACKAGING LTD., Defendant, Adv. Pro.
No. 17-01137 (MG)., 17-01155 (MG), 17-01159 (MG) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.).
Upon consideration, Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn granted the
motions for default judgments.

The defendants in these Adversary Proceedings are Deacons, Wheeler
Corporation Ltd., and Display & Packaging Ltd. The Defendants are
companies residing in and subject to the laws of Hong Kong. The
Plaintiff seeks to avoid and recover preferential transfers between
the Debtors and the Defendants under sections 547 and 550 of the
Bankruptcy Code that occurred during the ninety-day period prior to
the commencement of the bankruptcy cases on September 30, 2015.
Because none of the Defendants have answered or otherwise appeared
in any of these cases, the Plaintiff has moved for entry of default
judgments against each of them.

The factual and legal issues implicated in these motions are
similar. The motions raise the same issue whether a bankruptcy
court may enter a final default judgment in an adversary proceeding
in which the foreign defendant failed to respond to the summons and
complaint. The facts relevant to the analysis in these Adversary
Proceedings are similar. Each of the Defendants has its domicile in
Hong Kong. In each case, the Plaintiff served the summons and
complaint by causing the bailiff's assistant of the High Court of
Hong Kong to personally serve each Defendant at its Hong Kong
address. The Clerk's certificate of default, the motion for entry
of a default judgment, and the notice of presentment were
thereafter served on each of these Defendants in Hong Kong by U.S.
Mail.

The Court concludes that it may order entry of final default
judgments in each of the three adversary proceedings against
Deacons, Wheeler and Display. All three Defendants were properly
served, first with the summons and amended complaints by personal
service, then by mail with the certificates of default, motions for
entry of default judgments and supporting declarations, and notices
of presentment for orders granting default judgments. Each of the
Defendants failed to respond to the summons and complaint, or
otherwise appear in the actions. The fact that the three Defendants
are located in Hong Kong does not save them: The Plaintiff complied
with the applicable provisions of the Hague Convention, Hong Kong
law and U.S. bankruptcy law. Thus, the motions for entry of default
judgments are granted.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated June 29, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2uHgMKl from Leagle.com.

Peter Kravitz, as Creditor Trustee of the Creditor Trust of Advance
Watch Company Ltd., Plaintiff, represented by Brigette McGrath, ASK
LLP & Joseph L. Steinfeld, Jr., ASK LLP.

Wheeler Corporation Ltd., Defendant, pro se.

                   About Advance Watch

Founded in 1974, Advance Watch Company Ltd. is part of a
privately-held global enterprise that designs, assembles, markets,
and distributes consumer watches under the trade name Geneva Watch
Group.

Advance Watch Company Ltd., Binda USA Holdings, Inc., Sunburst
Products, Inc. and GWG International, Ltd. filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Proposed Lead Case No.
15-12690) on Sept. 30, 2015.  Jeffrey L. Gregg, the CRO, signed the
petition.

The Debtors engaged Venable LLP as counsel.

                       *     *     *

Advance Watch on Oct. 17, 2015, filed schedules of assets and
liabilities and statement of financial affairs.  On Oct. 22, it
filed amended schedules, disclosing $33.1 million in assets and
$20.8 million in liabilities.  A copy of the amended schedules is
available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Advance_Watch_99_Am_SAL.pdf

The Court on Jan. 25, 2016, entered an order confirming the
Debtors' Second Amended Joint Plan of Liquidation under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code dated January 22, 2016.


AIX ENERGY: Louisiana Court Amends May 23 Judgment
--------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned JEREMY SHEPHARD AND EMILY SHEPHARD AND
MICHAEL JACKSON AND TAMISIA JACKSON Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AIX
ENERGY, INC., AIX OPERATING COMPANY, BEAR CREEK SERVICES, LLC,
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, AVERY GRAVES IV, REPUBLIC
WELL TESTING Defendants-Appellants, No. 51,965-CA (La. App.),
plaintiffs have filed an application for limited rehearing to
correct the amended awards to allocate them to the balance of the
St. Paul policy. The defendants, AIX Energy Inc. and St. Paul Fire
& Marine Insurance Company, have also filed a request for limited
rehearing to correct the amended awards to reflect the 97.5%
allocation of fault to AIX Energy. The Court of Appeal of Louisiana
granted both motions.

The first, second, fourth, fifth and sixth paragraphs of the
judgment are amended and rendered as follows:

The Court renders judgment in favor of plaintiff Jeremy Shephard
and against defendant AIX Energy Inc. in the sum of $16,702,206.33
dollars, plus legal interest, this judgment being unenforceable
against AIX Energy Inc. pursuant to the ruling of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas
Division, In re: AIX Energy, Chapter 11, Case No. 15-34245, that
plaintiff's recovery from AIX Energy Inc. is limited to Aix Energy
Inc.'s liability insurance proceeds.

The Court renders judgment in favor of plaintiff Jeremy Shephard
and against defendant St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company in
the sum of $8,432,085.00 Dollars, which represents 76.90% of
$10,965,000.00 (the remaining proceeds of insurance coverage under
the St. Paul policy), plus legal interest from the date of judicial
demand until paid.

The Court renders judgment in favor of plaintiff Emily Shephard and
against defendant St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company in the
sum of 245,616 dollars, which represents 2.24% of $10,965,000 (the
remaining proceeds of insurance coverage under the St. Paul
policy), plus legal interest from the date of judicial demand until
paid.

The Court renders judgment in favor of plaintiff Michael Jackson
and against defendant AIX Energy Inc. in the sum of $4,529,603.48
dollars, this judgment being unenforceable against AIX Energy Inc.
pursuant to the ruling in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, In re: AIX Energy,
Chapter 11, Case No. 15,34245, that plaintiff's recovery from AIX
Energy Inc. is limited to AIX Energy Inc.'s liability proceeds.

The Court renders judgment in favor of plaintiff Michael Jackson
and against defendant St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company in
the sum of $2,287,299.00 dollars, which represents 20.86% of
$10,985,000.00 (the remaining proceeds of insurance coverage under
the St. Paul policy), plus legal interest from the date of judicial
demand until paid.

The remainder of the court's original opinion, rendered May 23,
2018, is affirmed as rendered.

A copy of the Court's decision dated June 27, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2O5U4ni from Leagle.com.

COOK, YANCEY, KING & GALLOWAY, By: Sidney E. Cook, Jr. --
sidney.cook@cookyancey.com -- Lisa C. Cronin, John T. Kalmbach --
john.kalmbach@cookyancey.com -- David J. Hemken --
david.hemken@cookyancey.com -- Counsel for Defendants-Appellants
AIX Energy, Inc. and St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.

MAHTOOK & LAFLEUR, By: Ward F. LaFleur -- wlafleur@mandllaw.com --
Richard J. Hymel -- rhymel@mandllaw.com -- GREGORIO, CHAFIN,
JOHNSON, POOLSON & TABOR, LLC, By: Scott Chafin, Jr. --
schafin@gcj-law.com -- Julie Payne Johnson, Counsel for
Plaintiffs-Appellees, Jeremy Shephard and Emily Shephard, and
Michael Jackson & Tamisia Jackson.

ROBERT L. SIEGEL, RACHEL G. WEBRE, JAMESON MICHAEL TAYLOR, Counsel
for Defendants-Appellees, National, Union Fire Ins. Co., AIG,
Specialty Ins. Co. a/k/a Chartis Ins. Co.

LUNN, IRION, SALLEY, ET AL., By: Gerald M. Johnson, Jr., Counsel
for Defendants-Appellees Bear Creek, Services, LLC and Avery,
Graves, IV.

JOHNSON, RAHMAN & THOMAS, By: Patricia Jackson Delpit, Counsel for
LWCC, Intervener-Appellee.

                   About AIX Energy

AIX Energy, Inc., is an oil and gas exploration and production
company.  AIX's business includes drilling oil and gas wells and
selling the petroleum products that result from such drilling
activities.  As such, AIX acquires and holds drilling and
production rights over various tracts of land located in Louisiana
through a number of oil, gas and mineral leases.

AIX Energy sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Case No. 15-34245) on Oct. 22, 2015.  The petition was signed
by Robert A. Imel, president.

The AIX case was originally assigned to Judge Barbara J. Houser,
but was transferred to Judge Stacey G.C. Jernigan, who oversees the
bankruptcy case of Antero Energy Partners.

AIX tapped The Harvey Law Firm, P.C., as counsel when it filed for
bankruptcy.  The Debtor won approval to engage Orenstein Law Group,
P.C., as special counsel.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors won approval to
retain Michael S. Haynes and the firm Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP as
counsel.

                            *     *      *

The Sec. 341(a) meeting of creditors was held Nov. 19, 2015, which
was continued to Jan. 5, 2016.

AIX on Feb. 12, 2016, filed a motion to extend by 90 days its
exclusive period to propose a Chapter 11 plan by May 19, 2016, and
its exclusive period to solicit acceptances of that that plan by
Aug. 19, 2016.  No order was entered.

Instead, the Court on March 23 entered an order directing the
appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee in AIX's case.

On March 14, 2016, Judge Houser held a hearing on the motion for
joint administration of the Chapter 11 cases of AIX and Antero.  At
the conclusion of the hearing, the Court determined not to order
the joint administration of the cases and further determined to
transfer the AIX case to Judge Jernigan.

On March 18, 2016, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
and LegacyTexas Bank entered a stipulation extending the
Investigation Period as defined in  Final DIP the Order with
respect to the Committee is extended through and including April
21, 2016.


ANCHOR REEF: Aug. 9 Plan Confirmation Hearing
---------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge James J. Tancredi approved Anchor Reef Club at
Branford, LLC's first amended disclosure statement in support its
plan of reorganization dated June 29, 2018.

August 1, 2018 is fixed as the last day for returning written
ballots of acceptance or rejection of the Plan, and the last day
for filing written objections to the plan.

August 9, 2018 at 02:00 PM is fixed as the date of the hearing to
consider confirmation of the Plan in the United States Bankruptcy
Court, 450 Main Street, 7th Floor Courtroom, Room 715B, Hartford,
CT 06103.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that the first
amended disclosure statement added a condition precedent to
Effective Date of the plan. The condition states that the Plan will
not become effective and the Effective Date will not occur unless
(i) all Class 2 unsecured creditors affirmatively vote to accept
the plan, or (ii) the Class 1 creditor and all Class 3 creditors
agree to waive this condition precedent.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb17-21080-140.pdf  

           About Anchor Reef Club at Branford

Anchor Reef Club at Branford, LLC, based in Westlake Village, CA,
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 17-21080) on
July 19, 2017. The Hon. James J. Tancredi presides over the case.
Timothy D. Miltenberger, Esq., at Coan Lewendon Gulliver &
Miltenberger, LLC, serves as bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities. The petition
was signed by Albert Nassi, manager of the member.


APPLESPRINGS INC: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
----------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of AppleSprings Inc.

                     About AppleSprings Inc.

AppleSprings Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 18-22312) on June 7,
2018.  In the petition signed by Douglas J. Zappi, president, the
Debtor disclosed that it had estimated assets of less than $1
million and liabilities of less than $1 million.  

Judge Carlota M. Bohm presides over the case.  The Debtor tapped
Robert O Lampl Law Office as its legal counsel.


APPLOVIN CORP: Moody's Assigns B1 CFR & Rates $870MM Loans B1
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B1 Corporate Family Rating and
B1-PD Probability of Default Rating to AppLovin Corporation in
connection with the pending convertible note redemption. Moody's
also assigned a B1 instrument rating to the proposed $870 million
1st lien sr secured credit facility ($50 million revolver and $820
million term loan). The rating outlook is stable.

Proceeds from the new debt issuance and roughly $400 million from a
new minority equity investment by funds associated with KKR & Co.
will be used to redeem the company's $1.2 billion of existing
convertible notes as well as pay transaction fees and expenses.

Rating actions for AppLovin Corporation ("AppLovin") include the
following:

Corporate Family Rating (CFR) -- Assigned B1

Probability of Default Rating -- Assigned B1-PD

Proposed $50 million Gtd sr secured 1st lien revolver due 2023 --
Assigned B1 (LGD3)

Proposed $820 million Gtd sr secured 1st lien term loan due 2025 --
Assigned B1 (LGD3)

Outlook is Stable

The transaction is expected to close in August 2018. Rating
assignments remain subject to Moody's review of the final
transaction terms and conditions.

RATINGS RATIONALE

AppLovin is solidly positioned in the B1 Corporate Family Rating
reflecting its success in helping game developers grow their
audiences in the mobile segment, high customer retention rates,
diverse customer base within the segment, and EBITDA margins
exceeding 20% with good free cash flow conversion. Game developers
pay the company based on success in acquiring mobile app users.
Moody's expects the global games market to continue growing in the
mid to high single digit percentage range or better which provides
tailwinds for AppLovin's revenue gains as it penetrates the even
faster growing mobile segment within gaming. The company's founders
started with a mission to provide mobile game developers a targeted
audience for their new apps, and revenues have nearly doubled since
FYE 2016 by delivering a platform with machine learning and 100%
programmatic capabilities that provides developers the ability to
identify potential users globally, generate income from in-app
purchases and ads, as well as monitor results in real time.

Debt ratings are pressured, however, by AppLovin's small scale
(although growing), uncertainties related to its ability to focus
on core operations while launching its own mobile gaming platform,
and the company's brief track record as a debt issuer. Although the
founders and other shareholders own 50.1% of the company and
control the majority of voting board seats, financial sponsors,
including KKR, own the remaining shares and could potentially be in
a position to exert greater control over financial policies. In
addition, Moody's believes there is the potential for deep pocketed
social media platforms, as well as new entrants, to expand beyond
the typical approach of offering only advertising to create
awareness of a new app. These rivals could develop their own
competing proprietary products to grab a greater share of this fast
growing mobile segment; however, AppLovin has a good head start and
should be able to maintain its leading position at least over the
next few years. Adjusted debt to EBITDA at closing is roughly 4.7
times (including earn outs), and Moody's expects annual organic
revenue and profit growth will result in improving credit metrics
over the next 12 -- 18 months including adjusted leverage below 4.0
times and more than 12% adjusted free cash flow to debt.

Moody's expects liquidity to be very good over the next 12 months
with free cash flow of more than $100 million, despite being a full
taxpayer, plus a minimum $150 million of cash and good availability
under the $50 million revolver due 2023. Ratings for the 1st lien
revolver and 1st lien term loan (B1, LGD3) are in line with the B1
corporate family rating given the credit facilities represent the
preponderance of funded debt.

The stable rating outlook incorporates Moody's base case scenario
reflecting organic annual revenue growth exceeding 15% over the
next couple of years before moderating to lower double digit
percentage growth rates. The outlook also incorporates Moody's
expectation that acquisitions will be funded primarily with excess
cash and potential debt issuances will be managed within the B1
rating. Moody's expects the majority of free cash flow will be
applied to debt balances and that the founders and other
shareholders will retain their majority ownership in the company
with KKR and other financial investors remaining as minority
shareholders.

Ratings could be upgraded if solid revenue growth along with debt
repayment lead to adjusted debt to EBITDA approaching 3.0 times and
the company demonstrates a commitment to conservative financial
policies. Liquidity would also need to be very good with growing
cash balances, good conversion of EBITDA to free cash flow, and
adjusted free cash flow to debt consistently above 15%. Ratings
could be downgraded if Moody's expects adjusted debt to EBITDA will
be sustained above 4.5x due to underperformance or due to debt
financed distributions or acquisitions. Ratings could also be
downgraded if liquidity deteriorates or if organic revenue growth
slows consistently below the mid-single digit percentage range
reflecting underperformance related to execution or competitive
pressures. There could also be downward pressure on ratings to the
extent KKR or other financial sponsors were to increase their
combined ownership in the company to greater than 50%.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

AppLovin Corporation, founded in 2011 with headquarters in Palo
Alto, CA, enables mobile game and other app developers of all sizes
to target their ideal audience globally with a monetization
platform based on user acquisition campaign performance. The
company reported gross revenue of $634 million for the twelve
months ended June 2018. Pro forma for the transaction, the company
will be majority owned by its founders and other shareholders
(50.1%) and by financial investors KKR (33.9%) and Orient Hontai
Capital (16.0%).


ARA MACAO: Committee Taps Engelman Berger as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Ara Macao
Holdings, L.P., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Arizona to retain Engelman Berger, P.C., as its
legal counsel.

The firm will advise the committee regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; investigate and analyze any assets of the Debtor
which may be available for benefit of unsecured creditors; assist
the committee in the negotiation and analysis of any plan of
reorganization; and provide other legal services related to the
Debtor's Chapter 11 case.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

     Scott Cohen               $400
     Patrick Clisham           $400
     Other Partners        $360 to $600
     Associates            $225 to $350
     Paralegals                $195

Engelman Berger is a "disinterested person" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Scott B. Cohen, Esq.
     Patrick A. Clisham       
     Engelman Berger, P.C.
     3636 North Central Avenue, Suite 700       
     Phoenix, AZ 85012    
     Phone:  (602) 271-9090  
     Fax: (602) 222-4999  
     E-mail: sbc@eblawyers.com   
     E-mail: pac@eblawyers.com

                   About Ara Macao Holdings

Ara Macao Holdings, L.P., provides real estate development
services.

On April 6, 2018, an involuntary Chapter 11 petition was filed
against Ara Macao Holdings, L.P. (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No.
18-03615).  The case is assigned to Judge Paul Sala.

The petitioning creditors are KB Partners, Inc., Christopher de
Sibert, Gary Nitsche, Daniel Dorgan, Richard Umbach and Edgewater
Resources, LLC. They are represented by Patrick A Clisham, Esq., at
Engelman Berger, P.C.

On May 8, 2018, the involuntary proceeding was converted to a
voluntary Chapter 11 proceeding (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No.
18-03615).  The Debtor hired Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A., as
bankruptcy counsel.

Ilene J. Lashinsky, U.S. Trustee for the District of Arizona, on
June 22, 2018, appointed five creditors to serve on the official
committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case.


BADGER MERGER: Moody's Gives B3 CFR & Rates 1st Lien Loans B2
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned new ratings for Badger Merger
Sub, Inc. (dba "Newport"), including a B3 Corporate Family Rating
(CFR) and a B3-PD Probability of Default Rating (PDR).
Concurrently, Moody's assigned B2 ratings to each of the proposed
$30 million senior secured first lien revolving credit facility and
$240 million first lien term loan. The ratings outlook is stable.

The new loans are being issued as part of a transaction whereby
affiliates of Kelso & Company (Kelso) are acquiring a majority
stake in Newport Group. Newport's existing owners -- affiliates of
Stone Point Capital and company management -- will roll over a
portion of their equity. At the close of the transaction, Badger
Merger Sub, Inc. will merge with Newport Group Holdings, L.P. with
the former being the surviving entity. For purposes of this credit
discussion, Moody's refers to Badger Merger Sub, Inc., Newport
Group Holdings, L.P., and Newport Group collectively as "Newport."
The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2018.

Assignments:

Issuer: Badger Merger Sub, Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, assigned B3-PD

Corporate Family Rating, assigned B3

Gtd Senior Secured Bank Credit Facilities, assigned B2 (LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Badger Merger Sub, Inc.

Outlook, assigned Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Newport's B3 CFR broadly reflects high leverage and small scale
relative to larger and financially stronger business service
companies. Pro forma for the transaction, debt/EBITDA measures over
7x (including Moody's standard adjustments). The company benefits
from a well-established and scalable position in the market for
small retirement plans, a high proportion of revenue comprised of
account fees that provide a degree of revenue visibility and
stability, a general trend of increasing regulatory compliance and
disclosure requirements for retirement asset administration, and a
good liquidity profile. Reliance on channel partners such as
financial advisors for sales carries the risk that loss of
relationships could have an adverse impact on operating
performance.

Moody's anticipates that Newport will maintain good liquidity over
the next 12 months, supported by its new $30 million revolver due
2023 and positive free cash flow.

Newport's proposed $30 million senior secured first lien revolving
credit facility due 2023 and $240 million first lien term loan due
2025 are each rated B2, one notch above the CFR, reflecting their
priority liens relative to Newport's $60 million senior secured
second lien term loan due 2026 (unrated).

The stable ratings outlook reflects Moody's expectation of modest
revenue growth over the next 12-18 months in the low single digits,
and a continued high level of leverage.

Factors that could lead to an upgrade include debt/EBITDA under 6x;
evidence of sustained conservative financial policies;
EBITA/interest over 1.75x; and free cash flow/debt sustained above
5%.

Factors that could lead to a downgrade include declining revenues,
including due to the loss of a large customer or channel partner;
weakened operating performance otherwise; a deterioration in
liquidity, including breakeven to negative free cash flow;
leveraging acquisitions or debt-funded dividends; or EBITA/interest
approaching 1x.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

Badger Merger Sub, Inc. (dba Newport), headquartered in Walnut
Creek, California, is an independent provider of retirement
services including retirement plan recordkeeping and
administration, life insurance distribution and servicing for
retirement plans, and consulting related to retirement plans. The
company generated more than $200 million of revenue during the
twelve months ended March 31, 2018.


BAILEY RIDGE: Court Awards $66K to Committee Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Thad Collins granted in part Goldstein &
McClintock LLLP's Second Interim Application for Compensation,
granted in part Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C.'s Second
Interim Application for Compensation, and granted Molstad Law
Firm's Second Application for Compensation.

Goldstein & McClintock, the counsel for the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors, seeks compensation and reimbursement totaling
$151,444.73. In particular, G&M seeks $99,381.50 in compensation
and $1,576.10 in expenses and DMTH, local counsel for the
Committee, seeks $49,888 in compensation and $599.13 in expenses
for work from October 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018, less time entries
for preparation and defense of fees removed according to
agreement.

Nearly every party, including the UST, objected to these fees.
Those objections generally allege that the Committee took an
overactive role in this case and that Committee counsel performed
unreasonable and unnecessary or duplicative work, in particular by
preparing and revising its own plan and disclosure statement. The
Committee argues that it did not duplicate work and had the
statutory authority to prepare and file its own plan and disclosure
statement. The Committee asserts this work was necessary to keep
Debtor and Debtor's insiders accountable.

Molstad, the Debtor's Counsel, seeks approval of $64,860 in fees
and $1,458.04 in expenses for work performed from May 31, 2017 to
April 26, 2018. The Committee objects to 214 hours of time entries.
The Committee argues that these time entries are improperly vague
and/or improperly lump together different actions into a single
time entry.

The Committee has argued that its attorneys' work was justified
because it had the authority to prepare and file a plan under the
Code. The Court, however, concludes that the mere existence of the
statutory authority to take an action does not make the action
reasonably necessary under section 330.

Here, the Court finds that much of the Committee's work preparing,
drafting, and revising its plan and disclosure statement is not
compensable. Although the Committee may have needed to push the
case along, the substantial time spent drafting the plan document
was unnecessary to accomplish that goal. Moreover, the time entry
details show that nearly all of the work on the plan was at some
point reviewed or redrafted by other Committee counsel.

Some of this time is appropriately compensable insofar as it was
time spent "negotiating on the plan of reorganization" or preparing
elements of the plan that was ultimately confirmed in this case. A
review of the time entry detail, however, shows that much of this
time was not spent negotiating—but instead on drafting,
redrafting, and conferencing with each other about the Committee's
plan documents. G&M alone spent 163.5 hours preparing these
documents. This time demonstrates a failure to "consider if the
costs . . . would be disproportionately large in relation to the
size of the estate or likelihood of success."

The Court concludes that G&M performed 190.8 hours compensable
under section 330. In its employment application, G&M agreed to a
blended rate of $350 an hour. Thus, under the lodestar analysis,
the Court awards G&M $66,780 in fees, less time entries for
preparation and defense of fees.

The Court also finds that DMTH performed 151.2 hours of work that
are compensable under section 330. The Court finds that a
reasonable rate is $290 and awards $1,856 for 12.8 hours at half
rate for travel time. The remaining 138.4 hours are compensable at
the full rate totaling $40,136, less time entries for preparation
and defense of fees.

Regarding the Debtor's Counsel, the Committee objects to 214 hours
of Debtor's Counsel's time entries. The Committee argues that these
time entries are improperly vague, improperly lump together
different actions into a single time entry, and/or are not in
1/10th of an hour increments. In addition to vague entries, the
Committee has also identified time entries that are block billed
and argues that these entries are not compensable.

Here, the Court finds that neither Debtor's Counsel's imprecise and
somewhat vague entries or block billing warrant a reduction. These
time entries contain a sufficient description of the work
performed—particularly in the context of the other entries--to
show an entitlement to compensation.

The results obtained are the most important factor when determining
the proper lodestar amount of fees. Thus, the Court here finds
these challenged time entries should not be disallowed.

The Court further finds that the overall facts mitigate any
vagueness of the time entries. The time entries contain
descriptions of the work performed, and the work performed was
connected to this case. Most importantly, Debtor's Counsel obtained
strong results. As result, the Court will not reduce Debtor's
Counsel's fees. The Court awards Debtor's Counsel $64,860 in fees
and $1,458.04 in costs.

In sum, the Court allows G&M compensation of $66,780 in fees, less
time entries for preparation and defense of fees removed according
to agreement, and $1,576.10 in expenses, the Court allows DMTH
compensation of $40,136, less time entries for preparation and
defense of fees removed according to agreement, and $599.13 in
expenses, and the Court awards Molstad Law Firm $64,860 in fees and
$1,458.04 in expenses.

The bankruptcy case is in re: BAILEY RIDGE PARTNERS, LLC, Chapter
11, Debtor, Bankruptcy No. 17-00033 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa).

A full-text copy of the Court's Ruling dated June 28, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2NwuW8i from Leagle.com.

Bailey Ridge Partners LLC, Debtor, represented by Donald H.
Molstad.

United States Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Janet G.
Reasoner, U.S. Trustee.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Creditor Committee,
represented by Brian J. Jackiw , Goldstein & McClintock LLLP,
Bradley R. Kruse , Des Moines & Matthew E. McClintock --
mattm@goldmclaw.com -- Goldstein & McClintock LLLP.

                 About Bailey Ridge Partners

Bailey Ridge Partners LLC, based in Kingsley, Iowa, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Iowa Case No. 17-00033) on Jan. 11, 2017.
The petition was signed by Floyd Davis, its managing member.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.

The Debtor is represented by Donald H. Molstad, Esq., at Molstad
Law Firm.

On March 2, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed the
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained
Goldstein & McClintock LLLP as lead counsel; Dickinson Mackaman
Tyler & Hagen, P.C., as Iowa counsel; Houlihan & Associates, P.C.,
as accountant; and Triton Capital Partners, Ltd. as financial
advisor.


BAY CIRCLE: Post-petition Operational Income to Pay All Claims
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bay Circle Properties, LLC and affiliates submit a disclosure
statement for their proposed plan of reorganization, dated July 2,
2018, which provides for an equitable distribution to Debtors'
creditors and preserves the Debtors' ongoing business operations.

Holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims against Bay Circle will be paid
in full on the Effective Date or within 14 days after entry of a
final non-appealable order resolving any objection to claim.
Members of this class include Russell Landscape with a claim in the
amount of $620.00; Peachtree Holdings, LLC with a claim in the
amount of $3,194.95; and Rent Recovery, LLC in the amount of
$3.194.95. The Holder of the Allowed Class 2 Claim is Impaired and
is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.

Holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims less than $1,ooo against DCT
Systems Group, LLC were paid in the ordinary course of business. If
the Holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims will be paid in full on the
Effective Date or within 14 days after entry of a final
non-appealable order resolving any objection to claim. Members of
this Class include Russell Landscape, LLC with a claim in the
amount of $760.

Sugarloaf Centre, LLC Holders believes that BellSouth and Russell
Landscape, LLC claims were satisfied in the ordinary course of
business. If the Claims have not been paid, Sugarloaf's Unsecured
Claimants will be paid in full on the Effective Date or within 14
days after entry of a final non-appealable order resolving any
objection to claim. Members of this Class Russell Landscape, LLC
with a claim in the amount of $760.00 and BellSouth with a claim in
the amount of $362.26.

Nilhan Developers, LLC believes that its Unsecured Claimants have
been paid in the ordinary course of business. If the unsecured
claimants have not been paid, they will be paid in full on the
Effective Date or within 14 days after entry of a final
nonappealable order resolving any objection to claim. Members of
this Class include Russell Landscape, LLC with a claim in the
amount of $705.

NCRT, LLC believes that its Unsecured Claimants have been paid in
the ordinary course of business. If the Claims have not been paid,
the Holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims will be paid in full on the
Effective Date or within 14 days after entry of a final
non-appealable order resolving any objection to claim. Members of
this include Class Russell Landscape, LLC with a claim in the
amount of $760 and BellSouth with a claim in the amount of
$362.26.

The Debtors will pay all claims from the Debtors' post-petition
operational income.
The Plan provides that the Debtors will act as the Disbursing Agent
to make payments under the Plan unless the Debtors appoint some
other entity to do so. The Debtors may maintain bank accounts under
the confirmed Plan in the ordinary course of business. The Debtors
may also pay ordinary and necessary expenses of administration of
the Plan in due course.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb15-58440-853.pdf

              About Bay Circle Properties

Bay Circle Properties, LLC, DCT Systems Group, LLC, Sugarloaf
Centre, LLC, Nilhan Developers, LLC, and NRCT, LLC, own 16
different real properties including significant undeveloped
acreage.  The properties also include office/warehouse buildings,
retail shopping centers and free standing single tenant buildings.

Bay Circle Properties, et al., filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case Nos. 15-58440 to 15-58444) on May
4, 2015.  The Chapter 11 cases are jointly administered.  In the
petition signed by Chuck Thakkar, manager, Bay Circle estimated $1
million to $10 million in assets and liabilities.

The Debtors tapped John A. Christy, Esq., J. Carole Thompson Hord,
Esq., and Jonathan A. Akins, Esq., at Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint,
LLP, as bankruptcy attorneys.  The Debtors engaged RG Real Estate,
Inc., as real estate broker.

No trustee has been appointed in the Debtors' cases


BEDFORD PROPERTIES: Seeks Authority to Use Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------
Bedford Properties BEH Y LLC, 1080-1088 Broad St BEH Y LLC, and
Green Fairmount Williams BEH Y, LLC, ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Connecticut to authorize its use of cash
collateral.

The Debtors require access to cash collateral to pay the operating
expenses necessary for normal operation of their businesses in
order that the Debtors will be able to reorganize the debt
structure and propose and confirm a plan of reorganization.

The Debtors believes that these Secured Creditors hold security
interests in the cash collateral:

     (a) Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, which holds a security
interest in the Debtors' inventory and accounts receivable to
secure three Notes and Mortgages with a total, cumulative remaining
balance of approximately $2,538,000; and

     (b) GREF Hartford LLC, which holds of a security interest in
the Debtors' inventory and accounts receivable to secure a Note and
Mortgage with a remaining balance of approximately $2,205,802.

In an effort to adequately protect the interests of Bayview and
GREF for Debtors' use of the cash collateral, the Debtors are
offering to provide Bayview and GREF with replacement liens
pursuant to and in accordance with 11 U.S.C. Section 361(2), in and
to all property of the estate of the kind presently securing the
indebtedness owing to Bayview and GREF.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb18-21009-27.pdf

                     About Bedford Properties

Bedford Properties is the fee simple owner of five six-unit
residential apartment buildings in Hartford, Connecticut having a
total aggregate value of $1.05 million.

Bedford Properties BEH Y, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D. Conn. Case No. 18-21009) on June 19, 2018.  In the petition
signed by Yakov Stiel, member, the Debtor disclosed $1.07 million
in total assets and $4.61 million in total debt. The Debtor is
represented by Gary J. Greene, Esq. of Greene Law, PC.


BRANDENBURG FAMILY: Gates Buying Maugansville Property for $170K
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Brandenburg Family Ltd. Partnership asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Maryland to authorize the sale of the
real property and improvements located at 18032 Alpine Drive,
Maugansville, Maryland to Chasidy L. Gates for $170,000.

The Property is encumbered by a consensual first lien in favor of
Middletown Valley Bank in the amount of $126,509 as of the Petition
Date.  Middletown Valley Bank's consensual lien will be paid in
full at settlement.

The Debtor owns the Property.  On May 29, 2018, the Debtor entered
into a Residential Contract of Sale with the Purchaser for the
Property in the amount of $170,000, free and clear of all liens,
claims and encumbrances.  

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Brandenburg_Family_113_Sales.pdf

After payment of costs and expenses of sale, including realtor
commissions, and transfer costs of approximately 8%, and the
consensual lien Middletown Valley Bank, there will be net proceeds
of approximately $29,000 to $30,000 to be paid to the bankruptcy
estate.

The Debtor believes, based upon the partner's knowledge of
comparable sales in the vicinity that the sales price for the
Property is at fair market value.  Further, the Property was
marketed through multi-listing for several months prior to the
contract of sale being tendered.  

The Debtor asks to waive the 14-stay of Federal Rule of Bankruptcy
Procedure 6004(h), as all parties secured by the property will be
paid at settlement, and the ability to settle at the earliest date
will prevent the continued accrual of interest and other fees
assessed against the Debtor.

The Purchaser:

          Chasidy L. Gates
          2554 Carrington Way
          Frederick, MD 21702

The Creditor:

          MIDDLETWON VALLEY BANK
          24 West Main Street
          P.O. Box 75
          Middletown, MD 21769

                About The Brandenburg Family LP

Based in Jefferson, Maryland, The Brandenburg Family Limited
Partnership is a Maryland limited partnership that owns parcels of
real property in both Maryland and Pennsylvania.

The Brandenburg Family LP sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-11041) on Jan. 25, 2018.
In the petition signed by Dwight C. Brandenburg, managing partner,
the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  Judge Thomas J. Catliota presides over the case.

The Debtor hired Mehlman, Greenblatt & Hare, LLC as its legal
counsel, and Squire, Lemkin & Company, LLP as its accountant.

No creditors committee, trustee or examiner has been appointed in
the case.


BRANDENBURG FAMILY: Gates Buying Maugansville Property for $177K
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Brandenburg Family Ltd. Partnership asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Maryland to authorize the sale of the
real property and improvements located at 18032 Alpine Drive,
Maugansville, Maryland to Chasidy L. Gates for $177,000.

The Property is encumbered by a consensual first lien in favor of
Middletown Valley Bank in the amount of $126,509 as of the Petition
Date.  Middletown Valley Bank's consensual lien will be paid in
full at settlement.

The Debtor owns the Property.  On May 29, 2018, the Debtor entered
into a Residential Contract of Sale with Chasidy L. Gates for the
Property in the amount of $177,000, free and clear of all liens,
claims and encumbrances.  

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Brandenburg_Family_111_Sales.pdf

After payment of costs and expenses of sale, including realtor
commissions, and transfer costs of approximately 8%, and the
consensual lien Middletown Valley Bank, there will be net proceeds
of approximately $28,000 to be paid to the bankruptcy estate.

The Debtor believes, based upon the partner's knowledge of
comparable sales in the vicinity, that the sales price for the
Property is at fair market value.  Further, the Property was
marketed through multi-listing for several months prior to the
contract of sale being tendered.  

The Debtor asks to waive the 14-stay of Federal Rule of Bankruptcy
Procedure 6004(h), as all parties secured by the property will be
paid at settlement, and the ability to settle at the earliest date
will prevent the continued accrual of interest and other fees
assessed against the Debtor.

The Creditor:

          MIDDLETWON VALLEY BANK
          24 West Main Street
          P.O. Box 75
          Middletown, MD 21769

                About The Brandenburg Family LP

Based in Jefferson, Maryland, The Brandenburg Family Limited
Partnership is a Maryland limited partnership that owns parcels of
real property in both Maryland and Pennsylvania.

The Brandenburg Family LP sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-11041) on Jan. 25, 2018.
In the petition signed by Dwight C. Brandenburg, managing partner,
the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  Judge Thomas J. Catliota presides over the case.

The Debtor hired Mehlman, Greenblatt & Hare, LLC as its legal
counsel, and Squire, Lemkin & Company, LLP as its accountant.

No creditors committee, trustee or examiner has been appointed in
the case.


C.R. OF ATTALLA: Wants to Hire McNair McLemore as Accountants
-------------------------------------------------------------
C.R. of Attalla, LLC, seeks to employ McNair McLemore Middlebrooks
& Co., LLC, as its accountant.

The Debtor expects the Firm:

(1) to assist with the preparation of income and other tax
     returns required by taxing agencies and other tasks as
     requested,

(2) to perform analytical and consulting services, if
     appropriate,

(3) to assist with financial reporting and the filing of monthly
     reports required by the Bankruptcy Court, and

(4) to perform other services as would be customarily performed
     by an accountant.

The individuals presently designated to represent the Debtor and
their monthly rates are:

       Kathy W. Fletcher      $275 per hour
       Lori Wetherington      $180 per hour

Ms. Fletcher assures the Court that her Firm does not connections
to the Debtor, creditors and any other party-in-interest and is a
disinterested party under 11 U.S.C. Section 101.

The Firm can be reached at:

     Kathy W. Fletcher
     Lori Wetherington
     McNair McLemore Middlebrooks & Co., LLC
     389 Mulberry Street, P.O. Box One
     Macon, GA 31202
     Tel No.: (478)746-6277
     Email Add: kfletcher@mmmcpa.com

                    About C.R. of Attalla

C.R. of Attalla, LLC, is healthcare provider in Attalla, Alabama,
that operates a skilled nursing facility.

C.R. of Attalla filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case
No. 18-50546) on March 21, 2018.  In the petition signed by Michael
E. Winget, Sr., manager, the Debtor estimated $500,000 to $1
million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in estimated
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge James P. Smith.  

Wesley J. Boyer, Esq., of Boyer Law Firm, L.L.C., is the Debtor's
counsel.

Pending bankruptcy cases of affiliates:

   Debtor                              Petition Date  Case No.
   ------                              -------------  --------
C. R. of Shadecrest, LLC                  8/15/17     17-51753
Chandler Health & Rehab Center, LLC       7/20/17     17-51550
Fairhope Health & Rehab, LLC              7/20/17     17-51551
Gordon Oaks at Greystoke, LLC             7/12/17     17-51472
Greystoke Health Systems, Ltd.            8/17/17     17-51772
Meadowbrook Extended Care, LLC            7/20/17     17-51552
Medical Management Concepts, LLC          8/15/17     17-51752
Porter Field Health & Rehab Center, LLC   6/27/17     17-51362
Ridgeview Extended Care, LLC              7/20/17     17-51553



CANUSO AT AURA: Taps Ciardi Ciardi as Bankruptcy Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Canuso at Aura LLC seeks to hire Ciardi Ciardi & Astin as its
bankruptcy counsel.

The Firm's hourly rates are:

         Partners      $485 to $545
         Counsel       $385 to $450
         Associates    $250 to $350
         Paralegals    $120 to $180
  
Albert A. Ciardi, III discloses that prior to the Petition Date,
represented John B. Canuso, Sr. and other affiliates of the Debtor
in negotiations with creditors in matters related to the Debtor as
well as unrelated matters.  The Firm has withdrawn from all such
representations and understands Mr. Canuso, Sr., individually,
filed a petition for chapter 11 protection with another law firm,
Mr. Ciardi says.  Finally, the Firm also represents an affiliate of
the Debtor, Aura Development, LLC, Mr. Ciardi adds.

Mr. Ciardi assures the Court that to the best of my knowledge, the
Firm do not hold an adverse interest to the Debtor and is a
disinterested person under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(14).

The Firm was retained by the Debtor on April 1, 2018.  It billed
$7,467.50 for April and May time on June 1, 2018 and was paid in
full on June 15, 2018.  It also billed $5,527.25 for June bills on
July 2, 2018 plus $3,500 for filing fees for the Chapter 11
bankruptcies of the Debtor and its affiliate which were paid on
July 5, 2018. All other outstanding prepetition fees were waived.
The Firm has requested a $100,00 postpetition retained from the
proposed postpetition debtor-in-possession financing.

The Firm can be reached at:

     Albert A. Ciardi, III, Esq.
     Nicole M. Nigrelli, Esq.
     Jennifer C. McEntee, Esq.
     Ciardi Ciardi & Astin, P.C.
     One Commerce Square
     2005 Market Street
     Suite 3500       
     Philadelphia, PA 19103
     Tel No.: (215)557-3550
     Fax No.: (215)557-3551
     Email: aciardi@ciardilaw.com
            jcranston@ciardilaw.com
            nnigrelli@ciardilaw.com

                          Canuso at Aura

Canuso at Aura, LLC, and Aura Development Group, LLC, filed for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Lead Case No. 18-23615) on
July 6, 2018.  The Debtors estimated assets of $1 million to $10
million and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.  Aura
Development Group is a real estate company based in Cherry Hill,
New Jersey.  Ciardi Ciardi & Astin serves as the Debtors'
bankruptcy counsel.


CCS ONCOLOGY: May Use Cash Collateral Pursuant to 13th Order
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Michael J. Kaplan of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of New York has entered a 13th Emergency Order
authorizing Comprehensive Cancer Services Oncology, P.C., and its
affiliated-debtors to use cash collateral.

Pursuant to a Thirteenth Emergency Order, the Debtors are
authorized to use cash collateral limited to the following purposes
and amounts, to the extent that, in the judgment of the Chapter 11
Trustee, they are necessary and appropriate for the protection of
the interests of the estates and/or property of the estates:

     (a) Payroll for employees of the Debtors Comprehensive Cancer
Services Oncology P.C. and CCS Medical, PLLC, as more particularly
set forth in a spreadsheet circulated among the appearing parties,
for the weeks beginning July 2, 2018 and July 9, 2018, with total
payments for those employees not to exceed $11,100 per week.
Sufficient funds to cover all employment taxes will be reserved and
adequate deposits to cover the taxes will be made within two
business days of the issuance of wages;

     (b) To Medent, for computer software services, $286;

     (c) To Julie Shamblen, to correct a previous underpayment of
payroll, the sum of $259.25 in gross wages, plus the employer's
share of payroll tax thereon;

     (d) To Iron Mountain, for document shredding, an amount not to
exceed $1,500; and

     (e) To Biosan, or a different party to the extent that a less
expensive option can be identified, for disposal of medical waste,
an amount not to exceed $1,000 (in addition to the sum of $1,500
that was authorized previously).

Bank of America, N.A., the United States and all Creditors holding
liens on or claims against the cash collateral, are granted
roll-over replacement liens or rights of setoffs as security, to
the same extent, in the same priority, and with respect to the same
assets, which served as collateral for said creditors' prepetition
indebtedness, to the extent of cash collateral actually used during
the pendency of Debtor's Chapter 11 case. Such replacement liens
will attach pro rata to the extent that cash collateral used was
subject to each creditor's respective first priority lien, without
the need of any further public filing or other recordation to
perfect such roll-over or replacement liens or security interests.

To the extent that the replacement liens fail to compensate the
Secured Creditors for the cash collateral use, each of the Secured
Creditors will have, respectively, an administrative claim under 11
U.S.C. Section 507(b) with priority over other expenses of
administration under Section 507(a)(2).

In order for the parties to be able to ascertain which creditor's
collateral has been used for the purposes authorized in the
Thirteenth Emergency Order, the Debtors will keep and preserve
records, currently in their possession or hereafter received or
created, that may enable the secured parties to ascertain the
source of all receipts used pursuant to the Thirteenth Emergency
Order including the amounts received from particular payors and the
invoices to which those receipts pertain.

A full-text copy of the Thirteenth Emergency Order is available at

               http://bankrupt.com/misc/nywb18-10598-305.pdf

                          About CCS Oncology

Comprehensive Cancer Services Oncology, P.C., doing business as CCS
Oncology, doing business as CCS Healthcare, along with its
affiliates, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Lead Case
No. 18-10598) on April 2, 2018. In the petitions signed by Won Sam
Yi, president/CEO, CCS estimated at least $50,000 in assets and $10
million to $50 million in liabilities.

CCS Oncology is a professional corporation operating a practice of
medical and radiological oncology treatment, with offices in
Orchard Park, Frankhauser, Niagra Falls, Kenmore, and Lockport.
CSS Medical PLLC is a provider of primary care and specialty
medicine services currently operating at Orchard Park, Delaware
Avenue, and Youngs.

CCS Oncology is the sole member of CCS Medical.  CCS Equipment is
the owner of certain medical equipment used in the medical
practices and CCS Oncology is its sole member. CCS Billing was
intended to be developed into a separate billing entity for the
medical practices, but was never funded or operational.  CCS
Billing has no assets and has had no activity other than showing a
couple of minimal historical accounting entries.  WSEJ is the owner
of certain real property used by the medical practices. The Debtors
are headquartered in Orchard Park, New York.

Judge Michael J. Kaplan is the case judge.  Arthur G. Baumeister,
Jr., Esq., of Baumeister Denz LLP, serves as the Debtors' counsel.

Mark Schlant has been named the Chapter 11 trustee.  Joseph J.
Tomaino of Grassi Healthcare Advisors LLC has been appointed
patient care ombudsman.


CD HALL: Authorized to Use Cash Collateral on Final Basis
---------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Laurel E. Babero of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada authorized C.D. Hall LLC to use cash and alleged
cash collateral on final basis consistent with the budget for a
period of three months.

Secured creditor Clearinghouse Community Development Financial
Institution will receive a replacement lien in cash.

A copy of the Order is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb18-13058-42.pdf

                       About C.D. Hall LLC

C.D. Hall LLC owns a child day care center in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The company previously sought protection from creditors on Nov. 29,
2013 (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 13-20032).

C.D. Hall LLC again sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 18-13058) on May 25, 2018.
In the petition signed by Jhonna Diller, managing member, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities ranging from $1 million to
$10 million.  The Hon. Laurel E. Babero presides over the case.
The Debtor is represented by Ryan A. Aanderson, Esq. of Andersen
Law Firm, Ltd.


CENTURY TOWNHOMES: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Century Townhomes Association.

                About Century Townhomes Association

Century Townhomes Association is a Pennsylvania non-profit
corporation that operates a homeowners association for residential
townhomes located in Clairton, Pennsylvania, known as Century
Townhomes.  Century Townhomes was a project of Action Housing,
Inc., designed to provide affordable housing in the City of
Clairton.  The development consists of over 425 residential
townhomes, owned by individual homeowners, landlords who rent units
to leaseholders, and a non-profit organization that provides
housing to individuals with disabilities in its units.

Century Townhomes Association sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 18-21925) on May 10,
2018.

In the petition signed by Eric Hatchett, president, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $100,000 and liabilities of less than
$500,000.  

Judge Jeffery A. Deller presides over the case.  The Debtor hired
Campbell & Levine, LLC as its legal counsel.


CHANDLER HEALTH: Taps McNair McLemore as Accountants
----------------------------------------------------
Chandler Health & Rehab Center LLC seeks to employ McNair McLemore
Middlebrooks & Co., LLC, as its accountant.

The Debtor expects the Firm:

(1) to assist with the preparation of income and other tax
     returns required by taxing agencies and other tasks as
     requested,

(2) to perform analytical and consulting services, if
     appropriate,

(3) to assist with financial reporting and the filing of monthly
     reports required by the Bankruptcy Court, and

(4) to perform other services as would be customarily performed
     by an accountant.

The individuals presently designated to represent the Debtor and
their monthly rates are:

       Kathy W. Fletcher      $275 per hour
       Lori Wetherington      $180 per hour

Ms. Fletcher assures the Court that her Firm does not connections
to the Debtor, creditors and any other party-in-interest and is a
disinterested party under 11 U.S.C. Section 101.

The Firm can be reached at:

     Kathy W. Fletcher
     Lori Wetherington
     McNair McLemore Middlebrooks & Co., LLC
     389 Mulberry Street, P.O. Box One
     Macon, GA 31202
     Tel No.: (478)746-6277
     Email Add: kfletcher@mmmcpa.com

              About Chandler Health & Rehab Center

Chandler Health & Rehab Center, LLC (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No.
17-51550), Fairhope Health & Rehab, LLC (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No.
17-51551), Meadowbrook Extended Care, LLC (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No.
17-51552), and Ridgeview Extended Care, LLC (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case
No. 17-51553), filed Chapter 11 petitions on July 20, 2017.  The
petitions were signed by Michael E. Winget, Sr., managing member.

The four debtors are affiliates of Gordon Oaks at Greystoke, LLC
(Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 17-51472) and Porter Field Health & Rehab
Center, LLC (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 17-51362).

The Debtors are represented by Wesley J. Boyer, Esq., at Boyer Law
Firm, L.L.C., in Macon, Georgia.

At the time of filing, Chandler Health and Fairhope Health each
estimated up to $1 million in assets and less than $10 million in
liabilities.  Meadowbrook and Ridgeview each estimated $500,000 to
$1 million in assets and $100,000 to $500,000 in liabilities.


CLINTON NURSERIES: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended to Aug. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge James J. Tancredi extended Debtors Clinton
Nurseries, Inc., Clinton Nurseries of Maryland, Inc., Clinton
Nurseries of Florida, Inc., and Triem LLC's exclusivity periods for
filing a reorganization plan through and including August 1, 2018,
and obtaining acceptances of the plan throughout and including Oct.
1, 2018.

The court in Adelphia laid out the following nine factors, which
courts have used to consider whether "cause" exists to extend a
debtor's exclusivity periods: (a) the size and complexity of the
case; (b) the necessity for sufficient time to permit the debtor to
negotiate a plan of reorganization and prepare adequate
information; (c) the existence of good faith progress toward
reorganization; (d) the fact that the debtor is paying its bills as
they become due; (e) whether the debtor has demonstrated reasonable
prospects for filing a viable plan; (f) whether the debtor has made
progress in negotiations with its creditors; (g) the amount of time
that has elapsed in the case; (h) whether the debtor is seeking an
extension of exclusivity in order to pressure creditors to submit
to the debtor's reorganization demands; and (i) whether an
unresolved contingency exists.

In surveying the docket and record of this Chapter 11 case and
weighing the representations and arguments of counsel, the Court
concludes that the balancing of the Adelphia factors weighs
decidedly in favor of the Debtors, notwithstanding the concerns and
protestations of Varilease Finance, Inc. The Debtors have met their
burden of establishing the requisite cause and clearly and
demonstrably satisfied several of the Adelphia factors. The course
of this case has shown linear, rational, incremental, prioritized,
and strategic advancement of the prospects for a Chapter 11
reorganization.

While this Court and the Chapter 11 process favor accord and
adequate disclosure, at this stage, the Court must weigh and
appropriately defer to the Debtors' business judgments about its
priorities, the sequencing of negotiations, and the development and
dissemination of material financial information while their plan
negotiations are still in progress and their direction is still in
flux. At this critical juncture in the case, this Court is
disinclined to intrude upon the Debtors' business and strategic
judgments that remain the Debtors' prerogative and risk. Therefore,
it will not direct or order the Debtors to provide any plan-related
financial disclosures to Varilease as a condition of the extension
of the exclusivity periods. When the time and the plan are ripe,
Varilease may well have cause to seek discovery or remedies under
Bankruptcy Rule 2004 if there is no party consensus or the Debtors
fail to voluntarily provide material financial information
preceding any disclosure statement hearing on their plan.

The application of the Adelphia factors to the facts of this case
establishes cause to extend each of the Debtors' exclusivity
periods as requested.

The bankruptcy case is in re: CLINTON NURSERIES, INC., CLINTON
NURSERIES OF MARYLAND, INC., CLINTON NURSERIES OF FLORIDA, INC.,
and TRIEM LLC, Chapter 11, Debtors, Case Nos. 17-31897 (JJT),
17-31898 (JJT), 17-31899 (JJT), 17-31900 (JJT) (Bankr. D. Conn.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision and Order dated
July 2, 2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2LCRMdE from
Leagle.com.

Clinton Nurseries, Inc., Clinton Nurseries of Maryland, Inc.,
Clinton Nurseries of Florida, Inc. & Triem LLC, Debtors,
represented by Christopher H. Blau --  cblau@zeislaw.com -- Zeisler
& Zeisler, P.C.,Eric A. Henzy -- ehenzy@zeislaw.com -- Zeisler &
Zeisler, P.C. & Patrick R. Linsey -- plinsey@zeislaw.com -- Zeisler
& Zeisler PC.

U. S. Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Steven E. Mackey,
Office of the U.S. Trustee,Kim L. McCabe, Office of the U.S.
Trustee & Kari A. Mitchell, Office of the United States Trustee.

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Creditor Committee,
represented by Lauren McNair -- lmcnair@gs-lawfirm.com -- Green &
Sklarz LLC & Jeffrey M. Sklarz -- jsklarz@gs-lawfirm.com -- Green &
Sklarz LLC.

Green & Sklarz, LLC, Creditor Committee, represented by Jeffrey M.
Sklarz , Green & Sklarz LLC.

                   About Clinton Nurseries

Founded in 1921, Clinton Nurseries, Inc., operates nurseries that
produce ornamental plants and other nursery products.  The company
grows trees, flowering shrubs, roses, ornamental grasses & ground
covers, perennials, annuals, herbs and vegetables. Clinton
Nurseries is based in Westbrook, Connecticut.

Clinton Nurseries and its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 17-31897) on Dec. 18, 2017.  David
Richards, president, signed the petition.  The cases are jointly
administered under Case No. 17-31897.

At the time of filing, Clinton Nurseries estimated its assets and
liabilities at $10 million to $50 million.

Judge James J. Tancredi presides over the cases.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors.


COMPCARE MEDICAL: IRS Cash Collateral Stipulation Approved
----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Scott C. Clarkson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California has entered an Order approving the
Stipulation between CompCare Medical, Inc. and the United States of
America on behalf of its agency, the Internal Revenue Service for
continued use of cash collateral.

A copy of the Order is available at

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-12748-85.pdf

                      About CompCare Medical

CompCare Medical Inc., which operates a busy general medical
practice with a daily patient count of 40 to 50 patients., filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-15707) on June
27, 2016.  In the petition signed by Alphonso Benton, president,
the Debtor estimated assets at $100,001 to $500,000 and liabilities
at $500,001 to $1 million.  Todd L. Turoci, Esq., and Julie
Philippi, Esq., at The Turoci Firm, in Riverside, California, serve
as the Debtor's counsel.


CORBETT-FRAME: Unsecureds Projected to Recover 16.2% Under New Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Corbett-Frame Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Kentucky its first amended small business
chapter 11 plan with disclosures.

Under the amended plan, each holder of an Allowed Claim in Class B
will receive its distribution equal to its pro rata share of 100%
of the Debtor's Net Profits from its operations for a period of
five years post-Confirmation after satisfaction of any Allowed
Administrative, Priority, and Tax Claims. "Net Profits" means the
cash remaining after payment of all ongoing company obligations,
including costs of goods, payroll, operating expenses, debt service
and leases, capital expenditures, and taxes with the maintenance of
an operating reserve to ensure Debtor has sufficient operating
funds to do orders and COD's and after payouts to US Bank, BizFi,
and any Allowed Administrative and/or Allowed Tax Claims. Net
Profits for each year will be determined and distributions made to
the Class B Claims on or before August 30th of the following year.
The Class B Claims are Impaired.

The Debtor believes that the total of all valid Unsecured Claims is
approximately $947,784.18. The Debtor believes estimated recovery
to Unsecured Creditors is 16.2% based on its financial
projections.

The Debtor will continue its jewelry store operations.
Notwithstanding any prior order, as of the Effective Date, the
Debtor will have the right to collect and use all revenues and
other cash collateral derived from the operation of the Assets.

Based on the financial projections, the Debtor should have
sufficient cash flow to pay all normal and customary operating
expenses and be capable of funding its Plan of reorganization.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/kyeb17-51607-136.pdf

                    About Corbett-Frame

Corbett-Frame, Inc., d/b/a Corbett-Frame Jewelers, owns a jewelry
store in Lexington, Kentucky, offering contemporary designer
collections & customized pieces.  The Company is a small business
debtor as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51D).

Corbett-Frame filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Case No.
17-51607) on Aug. 9, 2017.  In the petition signed by Jennifer
Lykins, its president, the Debtor estimated its assets and
liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million.  The case is
assigned to Judge Gregory R. Schaaf.  Jamie L. Harris, Esq., at the
Delcotto Law Group PLLC, is the Debtor's counsel.

No trustee or examiner has been appointed in the Chapter 11 case,
and no creditors' committee or other official committee has been
appointed.


COSI INC: R. Dourney Not Entitled to Administrative Claim, Ct. Says
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert J. Dourney has applied for payment of not less than
$261,613.56 as a priority expense of administration in the
bankruptcy case captioned In re: COSI, INC., et al., Chapter 11,
Debtors, Case Nos. 16-13704-MSH Through 16-13708, (Jointly
Administered) (Bank. D. Mass.).

He seeks severance pay based on his post-bankruptcy compliance with
certain pre-bankruptcy agreements with Cosi, Inc., the lead debtor
in this case. The reorganized Cosi and its affiliates and Craig A.
Jalbert, the liquidating trustee under Cosi's confirmed plan or
reorganization, each filed objections to Mr. Dourney's request.
Bankruptcy Judge Melvin S. Hoffman denied Dourney's motion.

Mr. Dourney maintains that he is entitled to an administrative
claim for "the actual and necessary costs and expenses of
preserving the estate, including wages, salaries, or commissions
for services rendered after the commencement of the case." Relying
on an April 24, 2017 affidavit of David Polonitza, the executive
vice president of LIMAB, a secured creditor and plan proponent,
filed in this case, Mr. Dourney argues that his post-petition
compliance with the Non-Compete Agreement, including his not
disclosing Cosi's weaknesses and not hiring away valued Cosi
employees, conferred a demonstrable benefit on the bankruptcy
estate. He notes that under his Employment Agreement his right to
receive severance pay was contingent upon his complying with the
Non-Compete Agreement and that under Delaware law (which governs
the agreements) "contemporaneous contracts between the same parties
concerning the same subject matter should be read together as one
contract."

The reorganized Cosi and the liquidating trustee dispute that Mr.
Dourney provided any benefit to Cosi post-petition and on this
basis object to his request for administrative claim status. The
reorganized Cosi also raises a number of additional objections,
including that Mr. Dourney breached the Non-Compete Agreement and
thus forfeited any right to severance pay and may in fact owe the
estate damages, that the Non-Compete Agreement was rejected by Cosi
pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 365 and thus cannot give rise
to a post-petition claim, and that even if the Non-Compete
Agreement had been assumed, it is a contract separate from the
Employment Agreement, does not provide for payment of severance,
and therefore does not give rise to any "cure costs" under section
365.

The Court finds that Mr. Dourney's right to severance payments are
untethered from his length of service. His right to severance arose
from the pre-petition Employment Agreement, the consideration for
which was delivered at the time the agreement was executed.
Similarly, his obligations under the Non-Compete Agreement arose
pre-petition, even if they carried over to the post-petition
period. Mr. Dourney has no administrative expense claim for
severance pay but rather is left with a general unsecured claim.

Mr. Dourney fares no better using his fall-back quantum meruit
argument. The sine qua non of an administrative expense claim is
the rendering of a service or the conferring of a benefit. Mr.
Dourney bases his claim on the fact that his complying with the
Non-Compete Agreement conferred a benefit on the bankruptcy estate.
Not harming the estate, as in not violating a non-competition
agreement, however, is not the same as rendering a service or
conferring a benefit. The failure to cause harm is not the legal
equivalent of conferring a benefit. Mr. Dourney's abiding
post-petition by the terms of the Non-Compete Agreement does not
qualify as a service or benefit for purposes of section
503(b)(1)(A).

Having failed to establish that post-petition he conferred a
benefit on or rendered a service to the debtor or the bankruptcy
estate, Mr. Dourney's request for allowance and payment of an
administrative expense claim is denied.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision dated June 28,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2mwFbhf from Leagle.com.

Cosi, Inc., Debtor, represented by Joseph H. Baldiga --
jbaldiga@mirickoconnell.com -- Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee
LLP, Paul W. Carey -- pcarey@mirickoconnell.com -- Mirick,
O'Connell, DeMallie &, Christine E. Devine --
cdevine@mirickoconnell.com -- Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee
LLP, Kate P. Foley -- kfoley@mirickoconnell.com -- Mirick,
O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee,LLP & Gina Barbieri O'Neil --
goneil@mirickoconnell.com -- Mirick O'Connell.

Reorganized Debtors, Debtor, represented by Sharon I. Dwoskin --
sdwoskin@brownrudnick.com -- Brown Rudnick LLP.

John Fitzgerald, Assistant U.S. Trustee, represented by Paula R.C.
Bachtell , U.S. Department of Justice Office of the United States
Trustee.

Craig A. Jalbert, Liquidating Trustee, Trustee, represented by Lee
Harrington , Nixon Peabody LLP.

Official Committee Of Unsecured Creditors, Creditor Committee,
represented byChristopher M. Desiderio , Nixon Peabody LLP,
Christopher J. Fong , Nixon Peabody LLP & Lee Harrington , Nixon
Peabody LLP.

                      About Cosi Inc.

Cosi, Inc., is an international fast-casual restaurant company
featuring its crackly-crust flatbread and specializing in a variety
of made-to-order hot and cold sandwiches, salads, bowls, breakfast
wraps, "Squagels" (square bagels), melts, soups, flatbread pizzas,
S'mores, snacks, deserts and a large offering of handcrafted,
coffee-based, and specialty beverages.  

The company was first established in New York in 1996 and
incorporated in Delaware in 1998.  In 2002, Cosi became publicly
traded company on the Nasdaq exchange under the symbol "COSI".

Cosi and its subsidiaries filed Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D.
Mass. Lead Case No. 16-13704-MSH) on Sept. 28, 2016.  The cases are
assigned to Judge Melvin S. Hoffman.

Prior to the petition date, the Debtors had 72 debtor-owned
locations and 35 franchised locations and employed 1,555 people.

The Debtors tapped Joseph H. Baldiga, Esq., and Paul W. Carey,
Esq., at Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, LLP, as counsel; DLA
Piper LLP (US) as special counsel; The O'Connor Group as financial
consultant; BDO USA, LLP, as auditor and accountant; and Randy
Kominsky of Alliance for Financial Growth, Inc., as chief
restructuring officer.  

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors.  The Committee's attorney is Lee Harrington,
Esq., at Nixon Peabody LLP.  Deloitte Financial Advisory Services
LLP serves as the Committee's financial advisor.


CRACKLE INTERMEDIATE: S&P Assigns 'B' ICR, Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issuer credit rating to
Charlotte, N.C.-based Crackle Intermediate Corp. In addition, S&P
affirmed its 'B' issuer credit rating on Wirepath LLC. The outlook
is stable.

S&P said, "We also affirmed our 'B' issue-level rating on
Wirepath's existing $50 million revolver expiring August 2022 and
$265 million principal amount first-lien term loan due August 2024.
The recovery ratings remain '3', indicating our expectation for
meaningful recovery (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 55%) in the event
of payment default."

The rating reflects the company's limited operating scale based on
revenues of about $260 million in 2017, narrow focus on consumer AV
and networking product, and exposure to the cyclical residential
construction and remodeling markets. However, the company's
established customer base and brand recognition among professional
custom installation integrators partially mitigate those risks.

S&P said, "The stable outlook on Crackle Intermediate reflects our
expectation that the company's established base of professional
integrators and good demand for home AV and networking products
will support solid revenue growth and FOCF over the next 12
months.

"We could lower the rating if the company's operating performance
deteriorates because of a weaker economy and heightened
competition, or if management and its sponsors adopt a more
aggressive acquisition strategy or shareholder return policy such
that leverage exceeds 6.5x.

"We believe rating upside is limited over the next 12 months
because of the company's weak operating scale and business
diversification. In addition, we do not expect the company's
leverage to be sustained at less than 5x given its financial
sponsor ownership. However, we could consider a rating upgrade if
Wirepath demonstrates consistent organic growth and market share
gains, or if management and the company's financial sponsor commit
to a more conservative credit profile such that leverage is
sustained at less than 5x even when accounting for shareholder
returns and strategic acquisitions."



CUBIC ENERGY: C. Wallen, FOI Bid for Ch. 11 Plan Enforcement Nixed
------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 16, 2017, Calvin A. Wallen and Fossil Operating, Inc. filed
a Motion for Order in Aid of Confirmation and Consummation of
Chapter 11 Plan Interpreting and Enforcing the Release, Discharge,
and Injunction of Certain Claims and Causes of Action. The motion
seeks interpretation and enforcement of provisions of the Cubic
Energy, Inc. Plan concerning the possible release, discharge, and
injunction of claims and causes of action, particularly any claims
against the Movants relating to the Louisiana Judgment. Tauren
Exploration Inc. Liquidating Trust filed its preliminary objection
to the Motion on June 6, 2017.

Upon review of the relief requested and the facts presented,
Bankruptcy Judge Christopher S. Sontchi denies the motion in its
entirety.

The Liquidating Trust contends the Motion is procedurally improper
as it (1) asks the court to issue an advisory opinion, (2) seeks
declaratory or injunctive relief without an adversary proceeding,
(3) moves for relief without proper notice from potentially
interested parties, and (4) is otherwise res judicata barred. To
the extent the Liquidating Trust proves one or more of these
procedural issues, the Court may be barred from reviewing the
substance of the Motion.

The Liquidating Trust argues that granting the Movants' requested
relief would require the Court to issue an impermissible advisory
opinion. Article III of the Constitution restricts the Judicial
Power of the United States to "cases" and "controversies," and
prevents federal courts from deciding "questions that cannot affect
the rights of litigants in the case before them." Federal courts,
including bankruptcy courts, are also barred from giving "opinions
advising what the law would be upon a hypothetical state of facts."
To allow decisions on these types of matters would be to open the
door to advisory opinions, over which the court has no
jurisdiction.

Here, the Movants have not successfully shown a case involving both
them and the Tauren Trustee, or a means for the dispute to end with
the motion. While the dispute may fall within the scope of the
Court's power at some point in the future, it does not fall within
its jurisdiction today. The Court therefore declines to opine on
the motion since to do otherwise would be to issue an advisory
opinion beyond the Court's jurisdiction.

The bankruptcy case is in re: CUBIC ENERGY, INC., et al., Chapter
11, Debtors, Case No. 15-12500 (CSS), (Jointly Administered)
(Bankr. D. Del.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion dated July 6, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2mz8srR from Leagle.com.

Cubic Energy, Inc., Debtor, represented by Justin R. Alberto --
jalberto@bayardlaw.com -- Bayard, P.A., Neil B. Glassman --
nglassman@bayardlaw.com -- Bayard, P.A., Robert W. Jones --
Robert.Jones@hklaw.com -- Holland & Knight LLP, Brent McIlwain --
brent.mcilwan@hklaw.com -- Holland & Knight & Brian Smith --
brian.smith@hklaw.com -- Holland & Knight.

U.S. Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by David L. Buchbinder,
Office of the U.S. Trustee.

Prime Clerk, Claims Agent, represented by Benjamin Joseph Steele,
Prime Clerk LLC.

Tauren Exploration, Inc. Liquidating Trust, Liquidating Trust,
represented by John S. Hodge, Wiener, Weiss & Madison, Roger Joseph
Naus, Wiener, Weiss & Madison, Marcos Alexis Ramos, Richards Layton
& Finger, PA & Brendan Joseph Schlauch, Richards, Layton & Finger,
P.A..

                   About Cubic Energy

Texas-based Cubic Energy, Inc., Cubic Asset Holding, LLC, Cubic
Asset, LLC, Cubic Louisiana Holding, LLC and Cubic Louisiana, LLC,
filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Proposed Lead
Case No. 15-12500) on Dec. 11, 2015.  Jon R. Ross signed the
petition as executive vice president and corporate secretary.

The Debtors are independent energy companies engaged in the
development and production of, and exploration for, crude oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids.  The Debtors' oil and gas
assets are located in Texas and Louisiana.

Cubic Energy disclosed total assets of $120.7 million and total
debts of $114.2 million, both as of March 31, 2015.

The Debtors have engaged Bayard P.A., as Delaware counsel, Holland
& Knight LLP as restructuring counsel, Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc.
as financial advisor and Prime Clerk LLC as noticing, balloting and
claims agent.

The Debtors disclosed $68,803,615 in total property and
$119,109,288 in total liabilities.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 notified the Court that no unsecured
creditors' committee has been appointed in the Chapter 11 case due
to no unsecured creditor response to the U.S. Trustee's
communication for service on the committee.

                           *     *     *

On February 17, 2016, the Court entered an order confirming the
Company's Third Amended Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization of Cubic
Energy, Inc., et al., Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code, filed on February 15.  The Plan was declared effective on
March 1.


CURTIS JAMES JACKSON: GSO Breach of Duty Claim vs Neligan Tossed
----------------------------------------------------------------
Neligan LLP filed a motion to dismiss the third-party complaint
brought against it by defendant/third-party plaintiff, GSO Business
Management, LLC in the adversary proceeding captioned CURTIS JAMES
JACKSON, III, Plaintinff, v. GSO BUSINESS MANAGEMENT LLC, JONATHAN
SCHWARTZ, MICHAEL OPPENHEIM, BERNARD GUDVI, NICHOLAS BROWN, and
WILLIAM BRAUNSTEIN Defendants. GSO BUSINESS MANAGEMENT LLC,
Third-Party Plaintiff, v. BOULEVARD MANAGEMENT, INC. and NELIGAN
LLP Third-Party Defendants, Adv. Proc. No. 17-02068 (AMN) (Bankr.
D. Conn.). Bankruptcy Judge Ann M. Nevins granted the motion and
dismissed Count IV of the complaint.

GSO acted as Mr. Jackson's business managers and personal and
business accountants from 2013 until October 13, 2015, when its
employment was terminated by Mr. Jackson.  Prior to GSO's
termination by Mr. Jackson, GSO was a professional, authorized to
be employed by Mr. Jackson, in connection with his bankruptcy case.
In order for GSO to be approved by the court as a non-attorney
professional for Mr. Jackson in the main case, Neligan drafted and
filed an application with the court. Neligan further negotiated to
resolve any objections to the Employment Application filed by
third-parties and the Office of the United States Trustee. Upon
GSO's termination by Mr. Jackson, Neligan prepared the Fee
Application. GSO and Neligan collaborated on multiple drafts of the
Fee Application which, ultimately, was not filed by either party.

Based on the court's own understanding of the main case here, it is
clear that Neligan was retained as counsel for Mr. Jackson, only.
Neligan was not -- and could not be -- counsel to GSO. By the time
Mr. Jackson's Chapter 11 plan of reorganization was confirmed on
July 10, 2016, GSO had been terminated from representing Mr.
Jackson for approximately nine months.

Other than conclusory allegations that Neligan owed a duty to GSO
to file a Fee Application, the GSO/Neligan Complaint does not plead
any facts that plausibly suggest Neligan owed such a duty to GSO.
Section 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code requires that professionals
to be employed by a trustee -- here by Mr. Jackson as a
debtor-in-possession -- must: (1) be disinterested; and, (2) not
hold or represent any interest adverse to the estate. It is well
established that were a debtor's counsel to be an advisor or agent
to a party in interest in a debtor's case other than the debtor,
that would be a conflict of interest violating the two prongs of
section 327(a). The court therefore declines to find that a Chapter
11 debtor's counsel -- here Neligan -- has or could have a duty to
GSO as contempleated in Count IV.

Even assuming arguendo that Neligan had a duty to GSO and breached
that duty, the court notes that the facts alleged -- which the
court assumes are true -- fail to even suggest that Neligan was in
control of the situation to the exclusion of GSO. Based on GSO's
own allegations, GSO knew that its compensation had to be approved
by the court under 11 U.S.C. sections 330 and 331. Taking the
allegations in the complaint as true, GSO could have filed its own
Fee Application, but it failed to do so. GSO simply fails to allege
that Neligan "was in control of the situation to the exclusion" of
GSO.

Because Count IV fails to include sufficient allegations supporting
a conclusion that Neligan owed a duty to GSO, that it breached the
duty, that it was in control to the exclusion of GSO, it must be
dismissed.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision and Order dated
June 29, 2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2O6LRzq from
Leagle.com.

Curtis James Jackson, III, Plaintiff, represented by Imran H.
Ansari, Baratta, Baratta & Aidala, LLP, Joseph P. Baratta ,
Baratta, Baratta & Aidala, LLP, James Berman -- jberman@zeislaw.com
-- Zeisler and Zeisler & John L. Cesaroni - jcesaroni@zeislaw.com
-- Zeisler & Zeisler PC.

GSO Business Management LLC, Michael Oppenheim, Bernard Gudvi,
Nicholas Brown & William Braunstein, Defendants, represented by
Ilan Markus, LeClairRyan A Professional Corporation.

Jonathan Schwartz, Defendant, pro se.

GSO Business Management LLC, 3rd Party Plaintiff, represented by
Ilan Markus -- ilan.markus@leclairryan.com -- LeClairRyan A
Professional Corporation.

Neligan LLP, 3rd Pty Defendant, represented by Adam B. Marks --
amarks@uks.com -- Updike Kelley & Spellacy.PC & Melanie A. Orphanos
-- morphanos@uks.com -- Updike, Kelly & Spellacy.

Boulevard Management, Inc., 3rd Pty Defendant, represented by
Robert W. Cassot, Morrison Mahoney LLP & Timothy J. Holzman,
Morrison Mahoney LLP.

                         About 50 Cent

Born July 6, 1975, Curtis James Jackson III, known professionally
as 50 Cent, is an American rapper, actor, businessman, and
investor.

50 Cent filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Conn.
Case No. 15-21233) on July 13, 2015 with $32.5 million in debt.
The bankruptcy came days after a jury ordered him to pay $5 million
to rapper Rick Ross's ex-girlfriend Lastonia Leviston for a sex
tape scandal.

In July 2016, U.S. bankruptcy court judge approved a Chapter 11
reorganization plan for 50 Cent.  The Plan requires 50 Cent to pay
$18 million to Sleek Audio to settle a judgment, $6 million to
Leviston, and about $4 million to settle a guarantee claim with Sun
Trust Bank, among paying off other creditors over a five-year
period.

In February 2017, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Ann Nevins discharged Mr.
Jackson's bankruptcy case.


DAVID ROSS: Tenant Hauschild Buying Culver City Property for $1.2M
------------------------------------------------------------------
David Vincent Ross and Cheri LeAnn Ross ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California to authorize the sale
of the real property located at 4047 Lincoln Ave, Culver City,
California, APN 4207-010-035, to Andrew Hauschild for $1,197,000.

The Property is currently owned by the Debtors and used as
investment property, but is unable to generate rental income
capable of generating a positive cash flow for the Debtors.  

The Debtors are informed that the Property is encumbered by the
following: (a) a lien for real property taxes by the County of Los
Angeles, with an estimated current balance of not more than $5,000;
(b) a deed of trust in favor of US Bank, N.A., in the amount of
$828,487 as of 10/26/2017, and a current estimated amount of not
more than $850,000; (c) a deed of trust in favor of Bank of
America, N.A., in the amount of $182,529 as of 10/24/2017, and a
current estimated amount of not more than $192,000; and (d) a lien
for Home Owners Associations ("HOA") dues of not more than $500.

The Debtors believe that the proposed sale to Buyer is in the best
interests of the Estate, and the Debtors are not proposing that the
offer be subject to overbid.  The proposed sale is a sale to the
current tenant residing in the Property.  The Property has a fair
market value of $1,097,000, and is being sold to the Buyer for
$100,000 over the fair market price.  The deposit is $35,910.  The
Buyer is agreeable to paying over the market price for the
convenience of being able to remain in the property where he
currently resides, effectively stating that the property is worth
more to him than to other potential buyers in the marketplace.

The sale will be free and clear of any other liens, if any (none
are known), including any tax liens which may be subordinated and
paid as priority claims.  Under the foregoing terms, the sale of
the Property is projected to yield no less than $75,000.00 in net
proceeds for the Estate.

The loan secured by first lien on the Property will be paid in full
as of the date of the closing of the sale, and the sale will be
conducted through an escrow and based on a non-expired contractual
payoff statement received directly from Select Portfolio Servicing,
Inc., servicing agent U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee,
Successor In Interest To Bank Of America, National Association As
Trustee As Successor By Merger To Lasalle Bank, National
Association As Trustee For Wamu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2007-Hy6 Trust.

The Debtors ask the Court to approve the employment of Power
Property Group and Brent Parsons, as agent, with compensation
pursuant to the Residential Listing Agreement (Exclusive
Authorization and Right to Sell).  They believe that the Agent is
qualified to complete the sale on behalf of the Estate.  The Agent
has agreed to reduced compensation of 5% of the sale price.

The Debtors also ask for authority to distribute the sales proceeds
for the payment of the costs of sale (including escrow and title
fees, and broker/realtor commissions), property taxes and/or
homeowner's association dues or fees, any trust deed encumbering
the property, any priority claims under 11 U.S.C 507 (there is one
IRS claim of approximately $5,000) and a $12,000 "buffer" for
unanticipated expenses necessary to close the sale, subject to the
Debtors' approval after demand in escrow.

The remaining funds after the payment of those liens and expenses
required to close the escrow on the Property will be held in the
Debtors' DIP bank account and will only be distributed with in
accordance with the terms of a confirmed Chapter 11 Plan or other
order of the Court.

A hearing on the Motion is set for July 19, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.
Objections, if any, must be filed within 14 days before the
hearing.

A copy of the Purchase Agreement and the Listing Agreement attached
to the Motion is available for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/David_Ross_168_Sales.pdf

Counsel for Debtors:

          Michael Jones, Esq.
          M. JONES AND ASSOCIATES, PC
          505 N Tustin Ave, Ste 105
          Santa Ana, California 92705
          Telephone: (714) 795-2346
          Facsimile: (888) 341-5213

David Vincent Ross and Cheri LeAnn Ross sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-12753) on July 11, 2017.
The Debtors tapped Michael Jones, Esq., at M Jones & Associates, PC
as counsel.


DESERT LAND: Wants to Hire Hutchison & Steffen as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Desert Land, LLC seeks to employ Hutchison & Steffen, PLLC, as its
special litigation counsel to continue representing it in
litigation pending in the District Courts of the State of Nevada
and the Nevada Supreme Court, nunc pro tunc to the Petition Date.

The Debtor's pending cases include:

a. Sher Development, LLC, et al., v. Desert Land Acquisition, LLC,
et al., and All Related Actions, filed in the District Court, Clark
County, Las Vegas, Nevada, as Case No. A-16-743298-B (the Sher
Development Case);

b. David Stoebling v. Desert Land, LLC, et al., filed in the
District Court, Clark County, Las Vegas, Nevada, as Case No.
A-16-731123-C (the Stoebling Case);

c. Desert Land Acquisition, LLC v Sher Development filed in the
Nevada Supreme Court as Consolidated Case Nos. 71609 and 72649;
and

d. Any further appeals of these cases.

The Firm's hourly rates are:

    Mark Hutchison   $300
    Jacob Reynolds   $350

The Firm received $28,153.50 in connection with the Stoebling Case
and $545,607.38 in connection with the Sher Development Case from
the Debtor, totaling $573,760.88 received for work performed
prepetition.

The Debtor and its affiliates and co-parties owe the Firm the sum
of $19,029.59 in connection with the Stoebling Case and $175,491.26
in connection with the Sher Development Case for work performed
prepetition.

The Firm assures the Court that to the best of its knowledge, it
does not represent any interest which would be adverse to it or the
bankruptcy estate and is thus disinterested within the meaning of
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

                       About Desert Land

On April 30, 2018, Tom Gonzales commenced an involuntary petition
for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code against Desert
Land, LLC.  The petitioning creditor was Bradley J. Busbin, as
trustee of the Gonzales Charitable Remainder Unitrust One.  Jamie
P. Dreher -- jdreher@downeybrand.com -- of Downey Brand LLP
represents the Trustee.

The Debtor and its affiliates sought and obtained the conversion of
the case to a case under Chapter 11 on June 28, 2018 (Bankr. D.
Nevada, Lead Case No. 18-12454.)  The Debtor's affiliates are
Desert Oasis Apartments LLC, Desert Oasis Investments, LLC, and
Skyvue Las Vegas LLC.

Schwartzer & McPherson Law Firm serves as the Debtors' counsel.


EARL GAUDIO: Court Reduces Ice Miller, FMB Requested Fees
---------------------------------------------------------
In the bankruptcy case captioned In Re EARL GAUDIO & SON, INC.,
Chapter 11, Debtor, Case No. 13-90942 (Bankr. C.D. Ill.), Ice
Miller LLP, as attorneys for Debtor Earl Gaudio & Son, Inc., filed
Second and Third Interim Applications for Compensation; and First
Midwest Bank, as custodian for the Debtor, filed Second and Third
Interim Applications for Compensation. Chief Bankruptcy Judge Mary
P. Gorman allowed the applications in part and denied it part.

Ice Miller is a well-respected, national law firm, and all of the
Ice Miller attorneys who have appeared in the case are
well-credentialed. But, for reasons that are not clear, they did
not focus on this case as required and failed to efficiently
resolve the many issues presented.

Ice Miller's preparation of the Second and Third Interim
Applications for itself and FMB evidences the lack of attention to
detail paid to the case. Literally hundreds of thousands of dollars
in compensation were requested in the applications either without
any documentation whatsoever or based on documentation riddled with
mathematical errors. Further, the exhibits to the applications were
heavily redacted, and Ice Miller made no effort to mitigate the
effect of the redactions by seeking to file unredacted copies under
seal or through an in camera review. The Ice Miller attorneys most
certainly know that a court cannot grant relief based on documents
with critical information redacted and that the burden was on them
to provide the required information to this Court. The submission
of heavily redacted time records without making any attempt to
provide unredacted information to the Court shows a disdain for the
process and a lack of interest in the case that justifies the
significant reduction in requested fees here.

FMB's Second and Third Interim Applications provide little
justification for its fees, and no attempt was even made in those
applications to claim that there was any net benefit to the estate
from the work that was done. FMB went along with Ice Miller and,
apparently, condoned Ice Miller charging $1500 to prepare a motion
to sell the inventory of the Danville UPS store for $1500. If FMB
employees have expertise in the disposition of assets, why did they
not see that abandonment of that inventory was the cheapest way to
conclude the matter? That and many other similar questions would
have needed to be answered for FMB to receive the fees it
requested. In the absence of any answers, FMB's fees are properly
reduced.

Here, both Ice Miller and FMB accrued hundreds of thousands of
dollars in fees over a three-year period. Unfortunately, neither
entity did much to justify the fees in their applications beyond
stating that they did the work they billed for. The Court's ability
to evaluate those fees was complicated by the substantial amount of
redactions and organizational defects present throughout the
applications. Other errors and the general carelessness with which
the applications were prepared raised further doubts about the
accuracy and reasonableness of the fees.

In the end, the failure of Ice Miller and FMB to justify their own
fees comes at a great cost to themselves. Had they heeded the
Court's earlier warnings about the care and attention required for
the allowance of fee applications, the outcome here might have been
different. But they did not pay attention to prior admonitions, and
their requested fees must be significantly reduced and disallowed.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion dated July 10, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2uI3Vrp from Leagle.com.

Earl Gaudio & Son, Inc., Debtor, represented by Daniel Magee
Anderson --  daniel.anderson@icemiller.com  -- Ice Miller LLP, John
David Burke -- john.burke@icemiller.com -- Ice Miller LLP, Ben T.
Caughey, Mercho Caughey & DeLay, Tyson Alexander Crist --
tyson.crist@icemiller.com -- Ice Miller LLP, Christina Laun Fugate
-- christina.fugate@icemiller.com -- Ice Miller LLP & Victoria E.
Powers -- victoria.powers@icemiller.com -- Ice Miller LLP.

U.S. Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Sabrina M. Petesch.

               About Earl Gaudio & Son, Inc.

Earl Gaudio & Son, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D.
Ill. Case No. 13-90942) on July 19, 2013.  The petition was signed
by Angela E. Major Hart, as authorized signer of First Midwest
Bank, custodian.  Judge Gerald D. Fines presides over the case.

The Debtor disclosed $11,849,187 in assets and $8,489,291 in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.  John David Burke, Esq.,
and Ben T. Caughey, Esq., at Ice Miller, LLP, serve as the Debtor's
counsel.

The U.S. Trustee appointed five creditors to serve in the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  The Committee retained Evans,
Forehlich, Beth & Chamley as its local counsel, and Rubin & Levin,
P.C., as its counsel.


EAST ORANGE: District Court Affirms Sale Enforcement Order
----------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned Roseann Denunzio, Plaintiff, v. Ivy Holdings,
Inc.; Ivy Intermediate Holdings, Inc.; Prospect Medical Holdings,
Inc.; Prospect New Jersey, Inc.; Prospect Eogh, Inc.; Defendant,
Civ. No. 17-1595 (D.N.J.), District Judge Kevin McNulty affirmed
Bankruptcy Judge Vincent F. Papalia's sale enforcement order and
reconsideration order and denied plaintiff Roseann Denunzio's
appeal.

The Debtor, East Orange General Hospital, Inc., was sold free and
clear in bankruptcy after due notice to creditors, including the
plaintiff, who then remained silent but now seeks to assert her
claims against the purchaser. Three orders are relevant:

   (1) Order dated January 21, 2016, authorizing, inter alia, sale
of all the debtor's assets free and clear of liens, claims, and
encumbrances. (Sale Order);

   (2) Order dated November 23, 2016, granting the motion of
Prospect2 to enforce the Sale Order and ordering Ms. DeNunzio to
dismiss, without prejudice, her pending lawsuit against Prospect in
the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County. (Sale
Enforcement Order); and

   (3) Order dated February 21, 2017, denying Ms. Denunzio's motion
for reconsideration of the Sale Enforcement Order and denying the
parties' applications for sanctions. (Reconsideration Order).

Ms. Denunzio appealed from the second and third orders.

Ms. Denunzio maintains that in issuing the Sale Enforcement Order
and ordering her to dismiss her State court NJLAD action against
Prospect, a non-debtor, the Bankruptcy Court erroneously exercised
jurisdiction over that State court action. First, she argues that
the Bankruptcy Court had no jurisdiction at all under Section 1334.
Her NJLAD action, she says, includes "separate and distinct claims
over which the Bankruptcy Court did not have jurisdiction." Second,
she argues that even if the Bankruptcy Court had jurisdiction, it
did not have the power to issue the Sale Enforcement Order in the
NJLAD action, a state law personal injury tort action which was at
best a "non-core" proceeding under 28 U.S.C. section 157(b)(2)(O).


The Court holds that Ms. Denunzio's arguments are misplaced. As
recognized by Bankruptcy Judge Papalia, the proceeding before the
Bankruptcy Court was not the State court action itself. Rather, the
proceeding before the Court was Prospect's Motion to Enforce the
Sale Order. Accordingly, the Bankruptcy Court did not exercise
jurisdiction over Ms. Denunzio's New Jersey Law Against
Discrimination case; it exercised jurisdiction over the Motion to
Enforce the Sale Order.

The Court also agrees with the Bankruptcy Judge's reasoning in
support of entry of the Sale Enforcement Order. Judge Papalia
reiterated his jurisdiction-related findings at the hearing on Ms.
Denunzio's Motion for Reconsideration, and properly denied that
motion based on that reasoning.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion dated June 28, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2Nv37gz from Leagle.com.

ROSEANN DENUNZIO, Appellant, represented by CHRISTOPHER W. HAGER --
chager@n-blaw.com -- NIEDWESKE BARBER HAGER, LLC.

PROSPECT EOGH, INC., IVY HOLDINGS, INC., IVY INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS
INC., PROSPECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC. & PROSPECT NEW JERSEY, INC.,
Appellees, represented by BRADFORD J. SANDLER, BENESCH FRIEDLANDER
COPLAN & ARONOFF, L.L.P. & DANIEL ROBERT LEVY -- dlevy@ebglaw.com
-- EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN PC.

                  About East Orange General

Located in East Orange, New Jersey, East Orange General Hospital is
211-bed hospital that claims to be the only independent, fully
accredited, acute-care hospital in Essex County and is a recognized
leader in behavioral health services, renal dialysis, wound care,
diagnostic services, emergency services, and family health care.

East Orange General Hospital, Inc. and parent Essex Valley
Healthcare, Inc. filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D.
N.J. Case Nos. 15-31232 and 15-31233, respectively) on Nov. 10,
2015.  Martin A. Bieber, the interim president and chief executive
officer, signed the petitions.  

East Orange General Hospital, Inc., in an amended summary disclosed
total assets of $36,686,168 adtotal liabilities of $37,374,246.  It
previously disclosed total assets of $36,686,168 and total
liabilities of $37,376,204.

The Debtors have engaged Lowenstein Sandler LLP as counsel,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as financial advisor, McCarter &
English, LLP as special transactional counsel, and Prime Clerk LLC
as claims, noticing and balloting agent.

Judge Vincent F. Papalia has been assigned the case.

The Debtors employ approximately 860 individuals.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on March 31, 2016,
Judge Vincent F. Papalia has authorized East Orange General
Hospital to change its name to EOGH Liquidation, Inc. in relating
to the sale of substantially all of the Debtors' assets to Prospect
EOGH, Inc.  The Sale closed as of Feb. 29, 2016.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed seven creditors to the
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee is
represented by Arent Fox LLP and Trenk, DiPasquale, Della Fera &
Sodono, P.C.

Laura L. Katz was appointed the Patient Care Ombudsman on Nov. 23,
2015.  Ms. Katz is a member of the law firm of Saul Ewing, LLP,
which also serves as her counsel in the Ch. 11 case


EASTGATE PROFESSIONAL: Selling Cincinnati Property for $3M
----------------------------------------------------------
Eastgate Professional Office Park, Ltd., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Ohio to authorize the sale of a
portion of its real property to wit 4357 Ferguson Drive,
Cincinnati, Ohio, Clermont County Auditor #413105A155, out of the
ordinary course of business, to Union Township Clermont County CIC,
Inc. for $3 million.

The Debtor had solicited offers for several months of its real
estate.  The Buyer's offer came unsolicited and exceeds any
previous offer.  The sale price of $3 million, free and clear of
all liens, will be diminished by approximately $200,000 to
accommodate the Seller's obligation to provide one thousand square
feet of space to the Buyer at 4435 Aicholtz Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio
for $1 per year.  This property is owned by EPOP V, who will need
to be compensated for the space.  The Buyer is to pay common area
charges at $5 per square foot per annum.  The normal rental is at
$7 per square foot per annum which will require a set aside for the
Lease and also includes funds to provide temperature control, roof
repair and tax proration.

The property represents 35% of the total square footage owed by the
Debtor, which at 40% vacancy and is the least profitable of the
Debtor's holdings.  The sale will reduce the mortgage by what
Debtor believes to be over 40%. The mortgage holder has been put on
notice of the contract and is currently considering the proposal.

The tax valuation has been fixed by the Clermont County Auditor at
$3,185,000, but due to the vacancy and other factors, a petition to
reduce the valuations is being pursued.

The contingencies for financing and inspection are set forth in the
sales contract.  The proposed Purchaser is an Ohio not for Profit
Corporation located at 4350 Aicholtz Road, Cincinnati, Ohio.  The
Closing will be in approximately 90 days after Court approval of
sale.  The sale is in the best interest of all creditors and the
Debtor.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Eastgate_Professional_164_Sales.pdf

           About Eastgate Professional Office Park

Established in 1996, Eastgate Professional Office Park Ltd. is a
privately-held company that operates nonresidential buildings.  It
owns real properties located at 4360, 4355, 4357, 4358 Ferguson
Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio, valued at $8.61 million.

Eastgate Professional Office Park sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ohio Case No. 17-13307) on
Sept. 12, 2017.  Gregory K. Crowell, manager, signed the petition.
At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $8.64 million in
assets and $9.31 million in liabilities.  Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins
presides over the case.  Goering & Goering LLC the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.  No creditors' committee, trustee or examiner
has been appointed.


EDEN HOME: PCO Files 2nd Interim Report
---------------------------------------
Susan N. Goodman, the appointed Patient Care Ombudsman, was
directed to submit her evaluation reports regarding the patient
care provided at Eden Home, Inc.

The PCO did not observe patient/resident1 decline and/or material
compromise in care to Debtor residents as contemplated by 11 U.S.C.
Section 333(b).  Accordingly, the PCO remains comfortable
maintaining the current 60-day site visit interval.

The PCO observed care, engaged with residents/visitors/family
members, engaged with staff on both day and night shifts, reviewed
quality data, and mingled throughout the facility over
two-and-a-half days.  Overall, the majority of clinical and
non-clinical staff reported feeling status quo relative to that
which was reported to the PCO in the First Report cycle.  Some
expressed fear surrounding the uncertainty associated with various
potential bankruptcy outcomes, particularly if team members had
previous employment experiences associated with facility closure or
reductions in force.  Many seemed keenly aware of a mid-August date
associated with the construction litigation process.

Limited clinical staff departures were reported -- all described as
unrelated to the bankruptcy process.  
One prospective professional employee ultimately turned down
his/her offer, citing uncertainty concerns related to the Chapter
11 process.  Since the First Report, the Debtor filled the quality
RN role and added a maintenance technician with HVAC expertise --
both important additions to the Debtor's team.  Unfortunately, the
PCO's second visit coincided with staff member vacations.
Accordingly, the PCO will prioritize meeting the nursing quality
and HVAC professionals during the next site visit.  The PCO did
meet one new floor technician this reporting cycle, who denied
complaints in the on-boarding process.

The Debtor reported anticipating a large certified nursing
assistant ("CNA") training class over the summer with the hope of
further reducing reliance on agency staffing support.  During the
PCO's visit, CNAs reported patient loads well within the Debtor's
staffing matrix as did licensed nursing staff.

The PCO directly engaged with housekeeping, dietary, social work,
therapy services, central supply, concierge, transportation,
maintenance, laundry, accounting, medical records, chaplaincy,
nurse practitioner, activities, MDS, wound care, pharmacy, human
resources, and admission team members.  Incidental operational
feedback noted during the site visit was discussed with the
leadership team.  Non-bankruptcy resident concerns that surfaced
during the site visit process were appropriately routed to internal
staff for follow-up.  No reportable concerns noted.     

In the interim reporting cycle, the PCO reviewed Certification And
Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting ("CASPER") data provided by the
Debtor.  Because the data is aggregated in a rolling six-month
format, the data reviewed blended pre and post bankruptcy data.
Nevertheless, the two months of rolling measure data reviewed
appeared relatively consistent without large data swings.  The PCO
will remain engaged on the Debtor initiatives based on CASPER
results.  The PCO also reviewed the available infection control
data calculations.  Again, raw percentage occurrence data appeared
relatively consistent post bankruptcy as compared to pre-bankruptcy
data.  The PCO will look forward to engaging with the quality RN on
further data analytics and quality initiatives moving forward.

In the interim reporting period, one of the unit managers
simplified the emergency cart organization and daily checklist log
and implemented these improvements across the various care halls
for consistency.  The PCO will remain engaged to note operational
improvements that continue to occur during the reorganization
process.    

Staff denied supply concerns, including those supplies associated
with wound care.  The PCO noted that the new foam waterless gel
cleanser was not yet in use.  The PCO did confirm that the
individual hand gel bottles remained available through central
supply as an option if staff did not like the "stickier" feel of
the hand dispenser gel currently utilized at the facility.  The PCO
noted that all but one gel dispenser utilized over the course of
the visit had product available, with the single outage attributed
to operational chance, and not reflective of a bankruptcy supply
concern.  Likewise, soap and paper products were stocked in the
various bathrooms utilized throughout the facility.  Resident units
were largely odor free.  Limited challenges related to urine odor
abatement appeared relatively consistent with what was noted during
the first reporting period.  However, noticeable improvement in one
area was remarkable, largely credited by clinical staff to an
exceptional housekeeping effort.

Resident and family interviews remained largely positive. The PCO
continued to observe clinicians in the facility rounding on
residents each day and engaging with clinical staff.  No concerns
noted.

A full-text copy of the PCO's 2nd Interim Report is available for
free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb18-50608-208.pdf

                       About Eden Home

Located in New Braunfels, Texas, Eden Home, Inc., d/b/a EdenHill
Communities -- https://www.edenhill.org/ -- is a not-for-profit,
faith-based organization that provides independent living,
affordable housing, assisted living, skilled nursing and
rehabilitation, long-term care and memory care services. The
EdenHill Communities Transportation Department provides ADA
services in support of seniors and individuals with disabilities.

Eden Home, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case
No. 18-50608) on March 16, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Laurence P. Dahl, CEO and executive director, the Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.

Judge Craig A. Gargotta is the case judge.

Dykema Cox Smith is the Debtor's counsel; Langley & Banack, and
Gravely & Pearson, L.L.P., as special counsels; Cushman & Wakefield
as real estate broker. Cushman & Wakefield has entered into a
Co-Broker Agreement with CF Commercial Brokerage, LLC d/b/a San
Antonio Commercial Advisors.

On March 26, 2018, the U.S. Trustee appointed Susan N. Goodman as
the Patient Care Ombudsman in the case.

On May 30, 2018, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of
Eden Home, Inc.  was appointed by the Bankruptcy Court.  The
Committee retained Martin & Drought, P.C., as counsel.


EMERALD GRANDE: Unsecureds to Recoup 100% Under Latest Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
Emerald Grande, LLC, filed a disclosure statement to accompany its
first amended plan of reorganization dated June 27, 2018.

After any objections to the general unsecured claims have been
resolved, all Class 7 Allowed General Unsecured Claims will be paid
pro rata, to the extent of the Cash remaining after payment of all
Priority Claims in the Case from the Net Proceeds from the sale of
the Elkview Hotel, the Summersville Hotel and the Kanawha City
Property. The remaining unpaid balance of Class 7 Claims, if any,
will be paid in full in equal monthly payments over 96 months from
the Effective Date. Estimated recovery for this class is 100%.

Under the initial plan, general unsecured creditors were classified
under Class 5 and will be paid pro rata to the extent of any cash
remaining after payment of all priority claims. The estimated
recovery was previously unknown.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/wvnb1-17-00021-455.pdf

                      About Emerald Grande

Emerald Grande, LLC, owns and operates two hotel properties, the La
Quinta Inn and Suites adjacent to the Elkview Crossings Shopping
Mall, in Elkview, West Virginia; and the La Quinta Inn and Suites
adjacent to the Merchants Walk Shopping Mall, in Summersville, West
Virginia.  It also owns a real estate development in Charleston
(Kanawha City), West Virginia.

Emerald Grande filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. W.Va. Case
No. 17-00021) on Jan. 11, 2017.  The petition was signed by William
A. Abruzzino, managing member. The case is assigned to Judge
Patrick M. Flatley.

The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $10 million to $50
million at the time of the filing.  The Debtor is represented by
Steven L. Thomas, Esq., at Kay, Casto & Chaney PLLC.  The Debtor
employs Woomer, Nistendirk & Associates PLLC as accountant; and
Realcorp, LLC as broker, with Jon Cavendish serving as the listing
agent, to market and sell its property in Kanawha County, West
Virginia.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed.


ENDURO RESOURCE: Taps Alvarez & Marsal as Restructuring Advisor
---------------------------------------------------------------
Enduro Resource Partners LLC received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to hire Alvarez &
Marsal North America, LLC, as its restructuring advisor.

The firm will assist the company and its affiliates in the
preparation of financial information and financial-related
disclosures required by the court; assist in discussions with
creditors, banks and secured lenders; review the Debtors'
compensation policies; assist in the preparation of a bankruptcy
plan; and provide other legal services related to the Debtors'
Chapter 11 cases.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

     Restructuring Advisory Services:

     Managing Directors       $850 - $1,050
     Directors                $650 - $800
     Analysts/Associates      $400 - $625

     Claims Management Services:

     Managing Directors       $750 - $875
     Directors                $575 - $725
     Consultants              $450 - $550
     Analysts                 $400 - $625

A&M received a $150,000 retainer in connection with the preparation
and filing of the Debtors' cases.  In the 90 days prior to the
petition date, the firm received retainers and payments totaling
$1,972,683 in the aggregate for services provided to the Debtors.

James Grady, managing director of Alvarez & Marsal, disclosed in a
court filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as defined
in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

        James Grady
        Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC
        Monarch Tower
        3424 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 1500
        Atlanta, GA 30326
        Tel: +1 404 260 4040
        Fax: +1 404 260 4090  
        E-mail: jgrady@alvarezandmarsal.com

                       About Enduro Resource

Enduro Resource Partners LLC and its subsidiaries are independent
oil and natural gas companies engaged in the acquisition,
exploration, exploitation, development, and operation of oil and
gas properties.  They have operated and non-operated oil and gas
assets in Texas, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Dakota, and Wyoming,
as well as royalty interests in certain properties in Montana.

Enduro Resource Partners LLC and five affiliates filed for Chapter
11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-11174) on
May 15, 2018.  Enduro Royalty Trust, a publicly-traded Delaware
statutory trust formed on May 3, 2011, has not filed a chapter 11
petition and will also continue to operate in the normal course.

In the petition signed by Kimberly A. Weimer, vice president and
CFO, the Debtors estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets
and liabilities.  

The Hon. Kevin Gross presides over the cases.  

Michael R. Nestor, Esq., and Kara Hammond Coyle, Esq., at Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP; and George A. Davis, Esq., Caroline
A. Reckler, Esq., Matthew L. Warren, Esq., and Jason B. Gott, Esq.,
at Latham & Watkins LLP, serve as counsel to the Debtors.  Evercore
Group, L.L.C., serves as the Debtors' financial advisor; and
Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as the Debtors' restructuring
advisor.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC serves as the Debtors'
claims and noticing agent.


ENDURO RESOURCE: Taps Evercore Group as Financial Advisor
---------------------------------------------------------
Enduro Resource Partners LLC received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to hire Evercore
Group LLC as its financial advisor and investment banker.

The firm will review and analyze the business, operations and
financial projections of the company and its affiliates; assist in
structuring, facilitating and effecting either a restructuring or
an asset sale; and provide other services related to the Debtors'
Chapter 11 cases.

Evercore will be paid (i) a monthly fee of $150,000; (ii) a fee
payable upon the consummation of any restructuring equal to 1% of
the full principal amount of any of the Debtors' indebtedness
subject to the restructuring, excluding any indebtedness held by
Riverstone Holdings LLC and its affiliates; and a fee payable from
the proceeds of any asset sale consummated equal to 1.5% of the
"aggregate consideration" received.  

Stephen Hannan, senior managing director of Evercore, disclosed in
a court filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as defined
in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Evercore can be reached through:

     Stephen Hannan
     Evercore Group L.L.C.
     55 East 52nd Street
     New York, NY 10055
     Tel: +1.212.857.3100

                       About Enduro Resource

Enduro Resource Partners LLC and its subsidiaries are independent
oil and natural gas companies engaged in the acquisition,
exploration, exploitation, development, and operation of oil and
gas properties.  They have operated and non-operated oil and gas
assets in Texas, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Dakota, and Wyoming,
as well as royalty interests in certain properties in Montana.

Enduro Resource Partners LLC and five affiliates filed for Chapter
11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-11174) on
May 15, 2018.  Enduro Royalty Trust, a publicly-traded Delaware
statutory trust formed on May 3, 2011, has not filed a chapter 11
petition and will also continue to operate in the normal course.

In the petition signed by Kimberly A. Weimer, vice president and
CFO, the Debtors estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets
and liabilities.  

The Hon. Kevin Gross presides over the cases.  

Michael R. Nestor, Esq., and Kara Hammond Coyle, Esq., at Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP; and George A. Davis, Esq., Caroline
A. Reckler, Esq., Matthew L. Warren, Esq., and Jason B. Gott, Esq.,
at Latham & Watkins LLP, serve as counsel to the Debtors.  Evercore
Group, L.L.C., serves as the Debtors' financial advisor; and
Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as the Debtors' restructuring
advisor.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC serves as the Debtors'
claims and noticing agent.


ENDURO RESOURCE: Taps Latham & Watkins as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Enduro Resource Partners LLC received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to hire Latham &
Watkins LLP as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the company and its affiliates regarding their
duties under the Bankruptcy Code; negotiate with creditors; analyze
proofs of claim; advise the Debtors regarding any potential sale of
their assets; assist in the preparation of a plan of
reorganization; and provide other legal services related to their
Chapter 11 cases.

The hourly rates range from $495 to $1,650 for the firm's attorneys
and $140 to $825 for paraprofessionals.

During the 90-day period prior to the petition date, the Debtors
paid a total of $2,246,132.  As of the Petition Date, the balance
of the retainer was approximately $826,087.

Caroline Reckler, Esq., a partner at Latham & Watkins, disclosed in
a court filing that her firm is a "disinterested person" as defined
in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases, Latham
& Watkins disclosed that it has not agreed to any variations from,
or alternatives to, its standard or customary billing arrangements;
and that no professional at the firm will vary his rate charged to
the Debtors based on the geographic location of their Chapter 11
cases.  

The Debtors have approved Latham & Watkins's standard rate
structure and determined that it is appropriate and is not
significantly different from the rates that the firm charges for
other non-bankruptcy representations or the rates of other
comparably skilled professionals.

Latham & Watkins can be reached through:

        Caroline A. Reckler, Esq.
        Matthew L. Warren, Esq.
        Jason B. Gott, Esq.
        LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
        330 North Wabash Avenue, Suite 2800
        Chicago, IL 60611
        Telephone: (312) 876-7700
        Facsimile: (312) 993-9767
        E-mail: caroline.reckler@lw.com   
        E-mail: matthew.warren@lw.com   
        E-mail: jason.gott@lw.com

                       About Enduro Resource

Enduro Resource Partners LLC and its subsidiaries are independent
oil and natural gas companies engaged in the acquisition,
exploration, exploitation, development, and operation of oil and
gas properties.  They have operated and non-operated oil and gas
assets in Texas, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Dakota, and Wyoming,
as well as royalty interests in certain properties in Montana.

Enduro Resource Partners LLC and five affiliates filed for Chapter
11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-11174) on
May 15, 2018.  Enduro Royalty Trust, a publicly-traded Delaware
statutory trust formed on May 3, 2011, has not filed a chapter 11
petition and will also continue to operate in the normal course.

In the petition signed by Kimberly A. Weimer, vice president and
CFO, the Debtors estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets
and liabilities.  

The Hon. Kevin Gross presides over the cases.  

Michael R. Nestor, Esq., and Kara Hammond Coyle, Esq., at Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP; and George A. Davis, Esq., Caroline
A. Reckler, Esq., Matthew L. Warren, Esq., and Jason B. Gott, Esq.,
at Latham & Watkins LLP, serve as counsel to the Debtors.  Evercore
Group, L.L.C., serves as the Debtors' financial advisor; and
Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as the Debtors' restructuring
advisor.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is the Debtors' claims
and noticing agent.


ENDURO RESOURCE: Taps Young Conaway as Co-Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
Enduro Resource Partners LLC received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to hire Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP.

Young Conaway will serve as co-counsel with Latham & Watkins LLP,
another law firm tapped by the company and its affiliates in
connection with their Chapter 11 cases.

The principal attorneys and paralegal designated to represent the
Debtors and their hourly rates are:

     Michael Nestor         Attorney     $845
     Kara Hammond Coyle     Attorney     $595
     Elizabeth Justison     Attorney     $425
     Betsy Feldman          Attorney     $300
     Troy Bollman           Paralegal    $255

The firm received an initial retainer of $75,000.

Young Conaway is a "disinterested person" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Michael R. Nestor, Esq.
     Kara Hammond Coyle, Esq.
     Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP
     Rodney Square
     1000 North King Street
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Tel: (302) 571-6600
     Fax: (302) 571-1253
     Email: mnestor@ycst.com
     Email: kcoyle@ycst.com

                       About Enduro Resource

Enduro Resource Partners LLC and its subsidiaries are independent
oil and natural gas companies engaged in the acquisition,
exploration, exploitation, development, and operation of oil and
gas properties.  They have operated and non-operated oil and gas
assets in Texas, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Dakota, and Wyoming,
as well as royalty interests in certain properties in Montana.

Enduro Resource Partners LLC and five affiliates filed for Chapter
11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-11174) on
May 15, 2018.  Enduro Royalty Trust, a publicly-traded Delaware
statutory trust formed on May 3, 2011, has not filed a chapter 11
petition and will also continue to operate in the normal course.

In the petition signed by Kimberly A. Weimer, vice president and
CFO, the Debtors estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets
and liabilities.  

The Hon. Kevin Gross presides over the cases.  

Michael R. Nestor, Esq., and Kara Hammond Coyle, Esq., at Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP; and George A. Davis, Esq., Caroline
A. Reckler, Esq., Matthew L. Warren, Esq., and Jason B. Gott, Esq.,
at Latham & Watkins LLP, serve as counsel to the Debtors.  Evercore
Group, L.L.C., serves as the Debtors' financial advisor; and
Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as the Debtors' restructuring
advisor.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC serves as the Debtors'
claims and noticing agent.


ESA ENVIRONMENTAL: Summary Judgment Ruling in Favor of F&D Upheld
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Court of Special Appeals of Maryland affirmed the circuit
court's order granting Zurich American Insurance Company and
Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland's motion for summary
judgment in the case captioned PROSPECT CAPITAL CORPORATION, v.
FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, et al., No. 282 (Md. Spec.
App.).

In 2007, Prospect Capital Corporationloaned ESA Environmental
Specialists, Inc. approximately $13.75 million. Zurich American
Insurance Company and Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland
(collectively "F&D") had issued payment and performance surety
bonds on ESA's behalf. Four months later, ESA sought protection
under federal bankruptcy law. Prospect later sued ESA and settled,
albeit for less than the full loan amount.

On Dec. 17, 2014, Prospect sued F&D in the Circuit Court for
Baltimore City, alleging that F&D aided, abetted, and conspired
with ESA to commit fraud. F&D moved for summary judgment and
requested a hearing. The circuit court granted F&D's motion and
entered an order to that effect.

Prospect argues on appeal that the circuit court erred in granting
F&D's motion for summary judgment.

Prospect based its case against F&D on conduct committed wholly by
ESA. Prospect alleged it didn't discover its cause of action
against F&D until Prospect recovered data that ESA had erased from
its server. And by Prospect's own reckoning, ESA committed the
fraudulent concealment, not F&D. This is Prospect's biggest hurdle:
since Prospect already had sued ESA under the same fraud theory in
2008, and recovered from and released ESA when they settled in
2011, how can it say that the fraud was concealed for another three
years? There may have been strategic or tactical reasons not to sue
F&D at that time, but Prospect knew the facts bearing on the
alleged fraud and knew F&D's relationship to ESA when it litigated
these issues against ESA directly. And indeed, ESA had identified
F&D as a potential defendant back then.

Moreover, Prospect's claims against F&D fail as a matter of law
because civil conspiracy and aiding and abetting are not
independent causes of action "capable of independently sustaining
an award of damages in the absence of other tortious injury to the
plaintiff." One of the requirements for tort liability as an aider
and abettor is that there be a direct perpetrator of the tort.
Thus, civil aider and abettor liability, somewhat like civil
conspiracy, requires that there exist underlying tortious activity
in order for the alleged aider and abettor to be held liable." It's
true that a conspirator can be liable for the conduct of a
co-conspirator. But here, ESA has already been released from
Prospect's fraud claim, and Prospect can't piggyback on that
resolved claim seven years later.

As such, summary judgment in favor of F&D was appropriate. There
was no fiduciary or confidential relationship between the parties
that prevented Prospect from gaining knowledge about all potential
tortfeasors through reasonable diligence. Accordingly, the
three-year limitations period for civil actions bars Prospect's
claim against F&D, and no exception to the discovery rule saves
these claims.

A full-text copy of the Court's July 5, 2018 Decision is available
at https://bit.ly/2JKGbrm from Leagle.com.


FALLS AT GILBERT: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
---------------------------------------------------
Debtor: The Falls at Gilbert, LLC
        4635 East Baseline Road
        Gilbert, AZ 85234

Business Description: The Falls at Gilbert, LLC is part of The
                      Falls Consolidated Enterprise.  Located
                      in the heart of the East Valley, the
                      Company's two buildings are perfect for any
                      events including annual holiday parties,
                      family reunions, high school proms,
                      conferences, birthday parties, banquets, and

                      meetings.  Visit
                      thefallseventcenter.com/location/gilbert-az
                      for more information.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 25, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Utah (Salt Lake City)

Case No.: 18-25419

Debtor's Counsel: Brent D. Wride, Esq.
                  RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER P.C.
                  36 South State Street #1400
                  P.O. Box 45385
                  Salt Lake City, UT 84145-0385
                  Tel: (801) 532-1500
                  Email: bwride@rqn.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Brooks Pickering, managing member.

The Debtor stated it has no unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/utb18-25419.pdf


FLOYD E. SQUIRES: Strombecks Buying Eureka Property for $500K
-------------------------------------------------------------
Janina M. Hoskins, the Examiner with Expanded Powers of the estate
of the Floyd E. Squires III and Betty J. Squires, asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California to
authorize the sale of the real property located at 833 H Street,
Eureka, California, an improved parcel, to Steve Strombeck and Erik
Strombeck for $500,000, subject to higher and better bids.

The Property is not occupied, generates no rent and is boarded up.
The Debtors' bankruptcy schedules indicated that the Property was
subject to one lien in favor of M&T Bank in the sum of $92,000.
However, a title report issued with respect to the Property reveals
various liens and encumbrances.  The Examiner believes that
numerous liens / encumbrances have been resolved, yet no
reconveyances or releases of liens were filed with respect to those
matters.

The title report for the Property notes a "Super Priority Deed of
Trust" in favor of Mark S. Adams, solely in his capacity as
receiver for the Property in the amount of $15,317.  The lien
amount was increased by an amendment recorded March 13, 2017, which
increased the loan amount to $158,107.  Unless paid by a prior
sale, the Examiner intends to pay the non-disputed sums
collateralizing $158,107 obligation, plus interest, if any, at the
close of escrow.

The Property is subject to a first deed of trust in the sum of
$40,000, dated Oct. 27, 1998 in favor of Val Jean, Inc., a Nevada
corporation.  The Property is also subject to a second deed of
trust in favor of Val Jean dated Dec. 15, 1998.  The Examiner is
informed and believes that these trust deeds may have been paid but
never reconveyed.  Accordingly, the Examiner believes that the
Property can be sold free and clear of these liens.  Val Jean is
not listed in the Debtors' schedules and not included in the
Debtors' Mailing Matrix.  The title company has also raised an
issue regarding the filing of the reconveyance of the foregoing
obligations, in that, because of those reconveyances, a notice of
pending action was filed.

The Property will also be sold free and clear of a pending Court
action with Val Jean as plaintiff and the Debtors and others as
defendants, recorded Aug. 1, 2001, in that, the Examiner believes
that this action has, in all probability, been resolved. If not, it
is in dispute.

The sale of the Property will be free and clear of a deed of trust
in the original amount of $192,500 dated August 31, 2001, with the
trustors being Betty Squires and Floyd Squires and the beneficiary
being Interbay Funding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
recorded Aug. 17, 2001.  The beneficial interest in this obligation
has been assigned to M&T Bank.  The Examiner believes she can sell
the Property pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 363(f)(3), with valid
amounts being paid from escrow or if any amounts are disputed, the
sale may be accomplished under 11 U.S.C. Section 363(f)(4).

The sale of the Property will be free and clear of a deed of trust
to secure payment of any obligations owed to Fidelity National
Title, a California corporation, recorded July 31, 2001, in that,
the Examiner believes that this obligation has been addressed or
otherwise resolved.  This obligation apparently relates to an
indemnity agreement issued by the Debtors in 2001.  The Examiner
believes she may sell the Property free and clear of this
obligation.

The sale of the Property will be free and clear of a grant deed
from Floyd E. Squires III and Betty J. Squires, as husband and
wife, to FB Squires Family Trust, a revocable trust, in that,
according to the title report, the grantee therein is not an entity
capable of taking title.  However, notwithstanding the foregoing,
the Examiner believes she can sell the Property, and she believes
that the entity will consent to the sale and execute those
documents as may be necessary or under 11 U.S.C. Section 363(f)(4),
and that, the interest is subject to a bona fide dispute.

The Property is subject to various interests in favor of the City
of Eureka, a municipal corporation, including a temporary
restraining order and four abstracts of judgment for various sums.
The Examiner believes she can sell free and clear of these liens,
and that, the City of Eureka will consent to the sale and execute
those documents as may be necessary to satisfy the title company
prior to closing.  At the City of Eureka's request, it is possible
the Examiner will request paragraphs in an order authorizing the
sale of the Property that removes the City of Eureka's liens only
as to the Property and not to other properties encumbered by the
liens in favor of the City of Eureka.

The parties have entered into the Residential Income Property
Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions for the sale of
the Property.  The Sale Agreement provides for a 45-day inspection
period from the time of entry of a sale order.  The Buyers are
purchasing the Property on an "as is, where is" basis, with no
warranties or representation.

The sale is subject to overbids, with a minimum overbid in the sum
of $525,000 all cash, on the same terms and conditions as the
offer, with the overbid deadline being set three days prior to the
Court hearing on the Motion.  If a qualified overbid is received,
an auction will be held before the Court, unless directed otherwise
by the Court.

The Examiner asks the Court to authorize her to direct payment from
escrow of the following standard expenses: (i) a real estate
broker's commission not to exceed 6% of the total sales price,
which will be split with the Buyer's broker, if any; and (ii)
standard closing costs, including but not limited to unpaid real
property taxes, escrow fees, if any, recording costs and the like.

She further asks that the stay otherwise imposed by Rule 62(a) of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h)
will not apply.

A hearing on the Motion is set for July 18, 2018 at 10:30 a.m.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/Floyd_Squires_293_Sales.pdf

Floyd E. Squires, III, and Betty J. Squires filed for chapter 11
protection (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 16-10828) on Nov. 8, 2017,
and are represented by David N. Chandler, Esq. of the Law Offices
of David N. Chandler.

Janina M. Hoskins was appointed as examiner of the Debtors.


FM 544 PARK: Court Approves Trustee's Amended Plan Outline
----------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Stacey G. C. Jernigan issued an order approving
the amended joint disclosure statement in connection with the
amended joint plans of reorganization filed by Kevin D. McCullough,
the Chapter 11 Trustee, for Debtors FM 544 Park Vista LTD. and
Pavist LLC.

August 1, 2018, at 2:30 p.m. is the date for the hearing on the
confirmation of the
Plan. The confirmation hearing will be held before the Honorable
Stacey G. C. Jernigan, United States Bankruptcy Judge, United
States Bankruptcy Court, Earle Cabell Federal Building, U.S.
Courthouse, 1100 Commerce Street, 14th Floor, Courtroom No. 1,
Dallas, Texas 75242.

                 About FM 544 Park Vista

FM 544 Park Vista Ltd. was formed on April 29, 2014, to acquire and
prepare for development a 31.5 acre tract located in Plano, Collin
County, Texas as a 318-unit senior housing apartment complex.  The
general partner of FM 544 is Pavist, a limited liability company,
while the sole limited partner is Shaw Family Trust No. 3.

FM 544 Park Vista Ltd., based in Addison, Texas, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-34255) on Nov. 7, 2017.
Pavist, LLC, filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-34274-11) on
Nov. 9.  Richard Shaw, their manager, signed the petitions.

The bankruptcy cases are being jointly administered for procedural
purposes only under the case of FM 544 Park Vista.  Judge Stacey G.
Jernigan presides over the cases.

FM 544 estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.

Joseph F. Postnikoff, Esq., at Goodrich Postnikoff & Associates,
LLP, is the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.

Kevin D. McCullough was appointed Chapter 11 trustee for the
Debtors.  The Trustee retained his own firm, Rochelle McCullough,
LLP, as counsel.  He tapped Barg & Henson, P.C., as his accountant.


FORASTERO INC: Capital Resource Buying Property for $9 Million
--------------------------------------------------------------
Forastero, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida to authorize the sale of the real property
located at 2 Tahiti Beach Island Road, Coral Gables, Florida to
Capital Resource Enterprise Corp. for $9 million.

The real property is the Debtor's primary asset.  The sale of this
piece of real property is within the sound business judgment of the
Debtor as it will permit for the Debtor to pay all its claims in
full.

The parties have entered into the "As Is" Residential Contract for
Sale and Purchase.  The Agreement provides for a purchase price of
$9 million with $800,000 initial deposit.  It contemplates a July
27, 2018 closing.

The Buyer acknowledges that the purchase is "As Is" Conditions.
The Debtor agrees that the total real estate Broker's Commission
for the transaction will be 6% of the sales price, which is to be
divided evenly between the Seller's Real Estate Broker and the
Buyer's Real Estate Broker.

The parties acknowledge that the property has several repairs that
are required.  Any and all insurance claims will be assigned to the
Buyer.  The Buyer acknowledges that there is an initial membership
HOA fee that has to be paid to the Association in the amount of
$135,000 and HOA fees of $8,200 quarterly.

The Debtor asks the matter be set for a hearing on June 22, 2018 at
2:00 p.m.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/David_Ross_168_Sales.pdf

                       About Forastero Inc.

Forastero, Inc., listed its business as a single asset real estate
as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B).

Based in Coral Gables, Florida, Forastero filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-13397) on March 23, 2018.
In the petition signed by Marie C. Vallejo, authorized
representative, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Robert A Mark.

Richard R. Robles, Esq., and Nicholas G. Rosoletti, Esq., at the
law firm Richard R Robles, PA, serve as the Debtor's counsel.
Reiner & Reiner, P.A., is the special counsel.


FRANKLIN ACQUISITIONS: Trustee Selling El Paso Property for $151K
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ronald E. Ingalls, the Chapter 11 trustee of Franklin Acquisitions,
LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of
Texas to authorize the sale of the real property, commonly known as
1701 N. Stanton, El Paso, Texas, including improvements, to Don
Luciano or assigns for $151,000.

The Debtor acquired the property by way of a Trustee's Deed dated
Nov. 3, 1998.  The stated amount of the sale was $5,000.

The El Paso County Appraisal District has valued the property at
$110,000.  The Debtor has scheduled the value of the property at
$382,420.  The Trustee has received a prior offer for the property
in the amount of $60,000.

The Trustee as the Seller and the Buyer, 1306 Texas Ave., El Paso,
TX 79901-1640, have entered into the Contract of Sale for the
Property, subject to the Court's approval for $151,000.

The proposed consideration to be received by the estate, including
estimated costs of the sale or lease, including commissions,
auctioneer's fees, costs of document preparation and recording and
any other customary closing costs: (i) $151,000 sales price; and
(iii) 6% broker's commissions equal to $9,060.  The Seller will
also pay for a title policy, preparation of the deed and bill of
sale, one-half of any escrow fee and costs to record any documents
to cure title objections that the Seller must cure.  Additionally,
the taxes will be pro-rated.

A description of the estimated or possible tax consequences to the
estate, if known, and how any tax liability generated by the use,
sale or lease of such property will be paid.  Based on the
Substitute Trustee's Deed, the estate will have a potential capital
gain of $146,000 on the sale.

A preliminary title search and review of the Schedules and proofs
of claim filed in the case indicate these liens, judgments, and
other claims may exist against the Real Property:

     a. Ad valorem taxes owing to the City of El Paso in the amount
of $3,484 for 2017 and prior years and $3,256 for 2018.

     b. Tax Lien Contract pursuant to Section 32.06 of the Texas
Tax Code dated Oct. 31, 2017 recorded in Clerk's File Number
20170081938, Real Property Records of El Paso County, Texas, and
Transfer of Tax Lien and Certified Statement recorded in Clerk's
File Number 20180002426, Real Property Records of El Paso County,
Texas, both in favor of Propel Financial Services, LLC.

     c. Deed of Trust in favor of Robert Malooly dated Oct. 25,
2004 recorded in Clerk's File Number 20040103503, Real Property
Records of El Paso, County, Texas securing a debt in the amount of
$40,000.

     d. Multiple Resolutions from the City of El Paso for the cost
of removing accumulated trash, vegetation and weeds, and other
rubbish in the amount of $2,872.

The foregoing liens will attach to the sale proceeds in the order
of priority.  The Trustee proposes to pay the lien of the City of
El Paso for ad valorem taxes at closing.  If the Trustee is able to
negotiate a partial release with Propel Financial Services, this
claim will be paid at closing as well.  The Trustee will also pay
the sanitation lien of the City of El Paso.  Because Robert Malooly
has not filed a claim, the Trustee will not pay such claim at
closing.

All liens, claims, interests and encumbrances will attach to the
proceeds from the sale to the same extent, priority and validity as
existed on the petition date.

                  About Franklin Acquisitions

Franklin Acquisitions LLC is a privately-held company whose
principal assets are located at 932 Cherry Hill, El Paso, Texas.
Franklin Acquisitions sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 18-30185) on Feb. 6,
2018.  In the petition signed by William D. Abraham, member, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  Judge H. Christopher Mott presides over the case.

Ronald E. Ingalls was appointed as the Chapter 11 trustee of
Franklin Acquisitions.  BARRON & NEWBURGER, P.C., serves as the
Trustee's counsel.


FRANKLIN ACQUISITIONS: Trustee Selling El Paso Property for $965K
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ronald E. Ingalls, the Chapter 11 trustee of Franklin Acquisitions,
LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of
Texas to authorize the sale of the real property, commonly known as
8820 Alameda, El Paso, Texas, including improvements, to Don
Luciano or assigns for $965,000.

The Debtor acquired the property through a Special Warranty Deed
from William D. Abraham.  The Deed was dated July 7, 2014 but was
not recorded until 2017.

The El Paso County Appraisal District has valued the property at
$1,485,060.  The Debtor has scheduled the value of the property at
$1,485,060.  The Trustee has received a previous offer for the
property in the amount of $500,000.

The Trustee as the Seller and the Buyer have entered into a
Contract of Sale for the Property, subject to the Court's approval
for $965,000.  The proposed consideration to be received by the
estate, including estimated costs of the sale or lease, including
commissions, auctioneer's fees, costs of document preparation and
recording and any other customary closing costs: (i) $965,000 sales
price and (ii) 6% broker's commissions equal to $57,900.  The
Seller will also pay for a title policy, preparation of the deed
and bill of sale, one-half of any escrow fee and costs to record
any documents to cure title objections that Seller must cure.
Additionally, taxes will be pro-rated.  

A preliminary title search and review of the Schedules and proofs
of claim filed in the case indicate these liens, judgments, and
other claims may exist against the Real Property:

     a. Ad valorem taxes owing to the City of El Paso in the amount
of $0 for 2017 and prior years and $46,181 for 2018.

     b. Tax Lien Contract pursuant to Section 32.06 of the Texas
Tax Code dated Oct. 31, 2017 recorded in Clerk's File Number
20170081938, Real Property Records of El Paso County, Texas, and
Transfer of Tax Lien and Certified Statement recorded in Clerk's
File Number 20180002426, Real Property Records of El Paso County,
Texas, both in favor of Propel Financial Services, LLC.

     c. Notice of Lis Pendens recorded on Sept. 7, 2017 in Clerk's
File Number 20170065942, Real Property Records of El Paso County,
Texas, and Notice of Sheriff's Sale in relation to Writ of
Execution in Clerk's File Number 20170092759, Real Property Records
of El Paso County, Texas, relating to a lawsuit brought by IFSGA
Management, LLC.  Notice of Child Support Lien against William
Abraham, also known as William David Abraham, filed Oct. 1, 2014 in
the amount of $473,344, recorded in Clerk's File Number
20140063539,
Real Property Records, El Paso County, Texas; Notice of Child
Support Lien against William Abraham a/k/a William David Abraham,
filed April 29, 2015 in the amount of $473,344, recorded in Clerk's
File Number 20150027961, Real Property Records, El Paso County,
Texas, and Notice of Child Support Lien against William Abraham,
filed Aug. 7, 2015 in the amount of $473,344, recorded in Clerk's
File Number 20150055473, Real Property Records, El Paso County,
Texas; all in favor of Laura Lynch.

     d. Abstract of Judgment in favor of IGSFA Management, LLC
against William Abraham, in the amount of $1,035,047 plus cost and
interest, filed May 31, 2017, recorded in Clerk's File Number
20170039643, Real Property Records, El Paso County, Texas.  Said
Abstract of Judgment being modified and/or extended by instrument
recorded in/under Clerk's File Number 20170067871, Real Property
Records, County, Texas.  Said Abstract of Judgment being modified
and/or extended by instrument recorded in Clerk’s File Number
20170092475, Real Property Records, El Paso County, Texas.  The
foregoing liens will attach to the sale proceeds in the order of
priority.  The Trustee proposes to pay the lien of the City of El
Paso for ad valorem taxes at closing.  If the Trustee is able to
negotiate a partial release with Propel Financial Services, this
claim will be paid at closing as well.  The Trustee will also pay
the sanitation lien of the City of El Paso.  Because Robert Malooly
has not filed a claim, the Trustee will not pay such claim at
closing.  All liens, claims, interests and encumbrances will attach
to the proceeds from the sale to the same extent, priority and
validity as existed on the petition date.

     e. Abstract of Judgment in favor of the City of El Paso, Texas
and its Building and Standards Commission, against Caples Land
Company, LLC and William D. Abraham, in the amount of $1,242,486
plus cost and interest, filed Nov. 21, 2017, recorded in Clerk's
File Number 20170086983, Real Property Records, El Paso County,
Texas.

     f. Abstract of Judgment in favor of Ivan Aguilera, against
William D. Abraham, in the amount of $105,000 plus cost and
interest, filed Dec. 11, 2017, recorded in Clerk's File Number
20170091428 Real Property Records, El Paso County, Texas.

     g. Abstract of Judgment in favor of IGSFA Management, LLC
against William Abraham, in the amount of $108,755 plus cost and
interest, filed Dec. 13, 2017, recorded in Clerk's File Number
20170092474, Real Property Records, El Paso County, Texas.

     h. Multiple Resolutions from the City of El Paso for the cost
of removing accumulated trash, vegetation and weeds, and other
rubbish in the amount of $2,621.

The foregoing liens will attach to the sale proceeds in the order
of priority.  If the Trustee is able to negotiate a partial release
with Propel Financial Services, this claim will be paid at closing.
The 2018 City of El Paso taxes will be pro-rated.  All liens,
claims, interests and encumbrances will attach to the proceeds from
the sale to the same extent, priority and validity as existed on
the petition date.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

  http://bankrupt.com/misc/Franklin_Acquisition_83_Sales.pdf

                  About Franklin Acquisitions

Franklin Acquisitions LLC is a privately-held company whose
principal assets are located at 932 Cherry Hill, El Paso, Texas.
Franklin Acquisitions sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 18-30185) on Feb. 6,
2018.  In the petition signed by William D. Abraham, member, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  Judge H. Christopher Mott presides over the case.

Ronald E. Ingalls was appointed as the Chapter 11 trustee of
Franklin Acquisitions.  BARRON & NEWBURGER, P.C., serves as the
Trustee's counsel.


FSA INC: Administrative Claims to be Paid in Full on Effective Date
-------------------------------------------------------------------
FSA, Inc., submits an amended small business disclosure statement
describing its amended plan of reorganization dated June 27, 2018.

This latest filing provides that all administrative expenses will
be paid in cash in full on the Effective Date unless otherwise
agreed by a holder of an Allowed Administrative Expense. The Debtor
estimates the total amount of its administrative expenses as of the
Effective Date will be $20,000, subject to revision upon updated
information from the Debtor.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated June 27, 2018 is
available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/mnb18-30465-52.pdf

                       About FSA Inc.

FSA, Inc., doing business as The Unofficial Dive Bar & Grill, filed
a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Minn. Case No. 18-30465) on June
20, 2018.  In the petition signed by CEO Christopher
Christopherson, the Debtor estimated under $50,000 in assets and
$500,001 to $1 million in liabilities.  The Debtor is represented
by Lamey Law Firm, P.A., and Tanabe Law.  No official committee of
unsecured creditors has been appointed in the Chapter 11 case of
FSA, Inc., as of March 29, according to a court docket.


FYBOWIN LLC: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-----------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 cases of Fybowin LLC, Fybomax Inc., Fybo Management
Inc., Rivertowne Growth Group LLC and Occupy Rivertowne LLC.

                       About Fybowin LLC

Fybowin, LLC, which conducts business under the name Rivertowne, is
a privately-held brewing company in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.  The
Rivertowne beer concept was born in 2002.  The company, one of the
very first craft brewers in Pittsburgh, has restaurants in Verona,
North Huntingdon, and the North Shore, as well as a Pourhouse in
Monroeville.  

Fybowin sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 18-21803) on May 4, 2018.  On May 7,
2018, the company's affiliates Fybomax Inc., Fybo Management Inc.,
Rivertowne Growth Group LLC and Occupy Rivertowne LLC filed for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case Nos. 18-21870 to
18-21873).  The cases are jointly administered with Fybowin's.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors disclosed these assets and
liabilities:

                                     Estimated        Estimated
                                       Assets        Liabilities
                                    -----------      -----------
Fybowin, LLC                        $100K-$500K         $1M-$10M
Fybomax, Inc.                        $50K-$100K         $1M-$10M   

Fybo Management Inc.                 $50K-$100K         $1M-$10M
Rivertowne Growth Group LLC            $1M-$10M         $1M-$10M
Occupy Rivertowne, LLC                  $0-$50K         $1M-$10M

Judge Gregory L. Taddonio presides over the cases.  Whiteford,
Taylor & Preston, LLP serves as the Debtors' legal counsel.


GARRETT PROPERTIES: Aug. 8 Plan Confirmation Hearing
----------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Frank W. Volk approved Garrett Properties, LLC's
third amended disclosure statement, dated May 11, 2018, referring
to its chapter 11 plan.

August 1, 2018 is fixed as the last day for filing acceptances or
rejections of the Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization, and
the last day for filing and serving written objections to
confirmation of the Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.

A hearing will be held at 1:30PM on August 8, 2018 in Bankruptcy
Courtroom A, Robert C. Byrd U.S. Courthouse, 300 Virginia Street
East, Charleston, West Virginia, to consider and act upon
confirmation of the Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that the Debtor
filed a Third Amended Disclosure Statement saying that it has
undertook negotiations with Huntington's new counsel, which
resulted to an agreed order, which resolved substantially all
issues between the Debtor and the Bank.  Under the Third Amended
Disclosure Statement, Huntington will be paid $2,250 per month at
5.5% over 15 years, with a five-year balloon.

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/wvsb15-20085-233.pdf

                    About Garrett Properties

Headquartered in Charleston, West Virginia, Garrett Properties,
LLC, is a limited liability company.  Since Aug. 17, 2004, the
Debtor has been in the business of owning, holding and renting
commercial and residential real estate.

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D.
W.V. Case No. 15-20085) on Feb. 24, 2015, estimating its assets and
liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million each.

Judge Ronald G. Pearson presides over the case.

James M. Pierson, Esq., at Pierson Legal Services, serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


GATEWAY BUICK: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Gateway Buick GMC Inc.

                       About Gateway Buick

Gateway Buick GMC is an automotive dealer in the greater St. Louis
area offering a selection of new and used vehicles with 37 service
bays scattered across the country.

Gateway Buick GMC, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.
Mo. Case No. 18-42085), on April 3, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Donald Davis, president, the Debtor estimated $50 million to
$100 million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Charles E. Rendlen III.
The Debtor tapped John Talbot Sant, Jr., Esq. of Affinity Law
Group, LLC as its legal counsel.


GLADYS LIMA: FDOT Buying Interest in Homestead Property for $110K
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Gladys Lima asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida to authorize the sale of her interest in the
real property located at 40 NW 8 St., Homestead, Florida to Florida
Department of Transportation ("FDOT") for $110,000.

On Schedule A, the Debtor scheduled her interest in the Property.
Post-petition, the FDOT contacted the Debtor about a widening of
roadway project the FDOT was completing that would impact the
Debtor.  The FDOT would be expanding the lanes of traffic on
Campbell Drive (NW 8th Street) in Homestead, Florida, and the
Debtor's Property would be impacted.

Specifically, the FDOT needed to acquire 962 square feet of land
immediately adjacent to the roadway of Campbell Drive (NW 8th
Street) from the Debtor consisting solely of parcel number 104
("Premises"), so that they may expand the roadway.  The subject
Premises are not improved with a physical structure, but do have a
portion of sidewalk and some trees.

The parties have recently reached an agreement on the sale, which
is subject only to Court approval.  By way of the Motion, the
Debtor asks approval of the sale of the Premises to the FDOT, free
and clear of liens, encumbrances and interests, with such liens,
encumbrances and interests to attach to the proceeds of the sale
and disbursed in the Debtor's forthcoming chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.

Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC is the only creditor with a known
security interest in the Property and similarly, the Premises.
Bayview filed Claim 4 and after the Debtor valued the Property, the
Debtor and Bayview agreed to the entry of the Bayview Agreement, by
which the Debtor and Bayview have agreed to repayment terms of the
underlying debt that will be incorporated into the Debtor's
forthcoming chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

Bayview's Claim 4 is premised upon the note and mortgage which were
assigned to it.  Specifically, the mortgage recorded at Official
Records Book 25992, Pages 4063-4094, of the Official Records of
Miami-Dade County, Florida, was assigned to Bayview pursuant to
that certain Assignment of Mortgage and Security Agreement dated
Sept. 19, 2007, and recorded on March 24, 2008, at Official Records
Book 26283, Pages 4588-4599.

The Debtor asks approval of a sale of the Premises, free and clear
of Bayview's Security Instruments, including the Mortgage and the
Assignment and any other claims of record held by Bayview.
Bayview's liens on the remainder of the Property (including the
building improved thereon) remain intact and are unimpaired by the
sale.

In addition to purchasing the Premises, the FDOT is also liable to
the Debtor for damages related to the taking of the Premises.  In
this case, the Debtor had engaged in comprehensive discussions with
the FDOT in terms of additional damages that she may suffer as a
result of the taking.  The FDOT increased its settlement offer that
the Debtor accepted, subject only to Court approval.  While the
value of the Premises was agreed to be $17,000, the Debtor is also
entitled to damages to the improvements in the amount of $7,000,
and severance damages in the amount of $76,000.  The FDOT has also
agreed to pay the Debtor's counsel's fees and costs associated with
the matter, in the total amount of $10,000.

Accordingly, the total amount to be paid to the Debtor under the
FDOT settlement including the sale of the Premises, is $110,000.
The FDOT's Purchase Agreement delineates the funds being paid to
the Debtor from the FDOT under the agreement.  The Debtor asks the
Court's authority to execute and deliver the Agreement to the
FDOT's agents, along with a properly executed Warranty Deed
conveying the Premises in exchange for the total sum of $110,000 to
be paid to the counsel's trust account and to be disbursed in
accordance with the Debtor's forthcoming plan of reorganization.

In an effort to move the matter towards a conclusion and so that
(a) the sale can close and the FDOT can proceed with its project,
and (b) the Debtor can file and present her plan of reorganization
to the Court and all creditors, the Debtor asks that the Court
waives the 14-day stay of the prospective Order granting the
Motion, pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004(h), and that said
prospective Order be given immediate effect upon its entry.

The Purchaser:

          FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
          c/o Glass Land Acquisition Service Specialists, Inc.
          Attn: Richard Glass
          6401 SW 87th Avenue, Ste. 112
          Miami, FL 33173

The Creditor:

          BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC
          c/o Corporation Service CO.
          1201 Hays Street
          Tallahassee, FL 32301

Counsel for Debtor:

          Stephen C. Breuer, Esq.
          MOFFA & BREUER, PLLC
          1776 N. Pine Island Road, Suite 102
          Plantation, Florida 33322
          Telephone: (954) 634-4733
          Facsimile: (954) 337-0637
          E-mail: Stephen@moffa.law

Gladys Lima sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
17-11571) on Feb. 8, 2017.  The Debtor tapped Stephen C Breuer,
Esq., as counsel.


GORDON OAKS: Wants to Hire McNair McLemore as Accountants
---------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Oaks at Greystoke, LLC, seeks to employ McNair McLemore
Middlebrooks & Co., LLC, as its accountant.

The Debtor expects the Firm:

(1) to assist with the preparation of income and other tax
     returns required by taxing agencies and other tasks as
     requested,

(2) to perform analytical and consulting services, if
     appropriate,

(3) to assist with financial reporting and the filing of monthly
     reports required by the Bankruptcy Court, and

(4) to perform other services as would be customarily performed
     by an accountant.

The individuals presently designated to represent the Debtor and
their monthly rates are:

        Kathy W. Fletcher      $275 per hour
        Lori Wetherington      $180 per hour

Ms. Fletcher assures the Court that her Firm does not connections
to the Debtor, creditors and any other party-in-interest and is a
disinterested party under 11 U.S.C. Section 101.

The Firm can be reached at:

     Kathy W. Fletcher
     Lori Wetherington
     McNair McLemore Middlebrooks & Co., LLC
     389 Mulberry Street, P.O. Box One
     Macon, GA 31202
     Tel No.: (478)746-6277
     E-mail: kfletcher@mmmcpa.com

                       About Gordon Oaks

Gordon Oaks at Greystoke, L.L.C., filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 17-51472) on July 12, 2017, and
represented by Wesley J. Boyer, Esq., at Boyer Law Firm, L.L.C., in
Macon, Georgia.

Gordon Oaks is engaged in the health care business (as defined in
11 U.S.C. Section 101(27A)).  Its principal assets are located at
Mobile, Mobile, AL 36608.  Gordon Oaks is an affiliate of Porter
Field Health & Rehab Center LLC, which sought bankruptcy protection
on June 27, 2017 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 17-51362).

Gordon Oaks' case is assigned to Hon. James P. Smith.

In the petition signed by Michael Winget, managing member, Gordon
Oaks estimated assets of $100,000 to $500,000 and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.


HEARTLAND CARE: PCO Files Report
--------------------------------
Melissa B. Sisneros, appointed as Patient Care Ombudsman, filed the
following report to the Court regarding the quality of patient care
being provided to patients of Heartland Care, Inc.:

   1. Ombudsman Southeast Regional Coordinator, Sheri Jones made an
unannounced visit on May 30, 2018. Census appears to be about
average for the facility.

   2. The outside of the building as well as the grounds appear to
be clean and maintained.

   3. The Debtor's indoor facility appeared tidy and housekeeping
was observed cleaning rooms.  Informational posters regarding the
Ombudsman Program were properly displayed in the building.
Temperature in resident areas seemed appropriate for the day.
Residents observed appeared well
groomed and appropriately dressed.  Residents were engaged in
various activities. Several residents were observed sitting in the
living room and some were visiting with each other as well as other
staff members.

   4. Between the visit on March 8, 2017, and May 30, 2018 there
were no complaints from residents, family members or staff nor have
there been any recent complaints about the facility made to the
ombudsman.

5. During the visit ombudsman spoke with residents, staff and
management.  A representative of the residents' council reported no
concerns about Debtor's pending bankruptcy, he states the other
residents have all received good communication about the issue and
understand they should not be impacted by the bankruptcy.  This
appears to be true based on interviews and observations.

   6. Facility has recently purchased a new bus to transport
residents to and from doctor appointments. Staff and residents are
happy with the new purchase. New wood like floors are being put in
at the present time. The hallways are completed and resident rooms
are being done. New tables and chairs were purchased and are being
utilized.

   7. The facilities administrator resigned and the office manager
is acting director. The administrator license the building is
currently operating under is Raynell Tweety. She is actually the
owner of the building as well. The spouse of Raynell Tweety, Mike
Tweety, is assisting in day to day operations. There is also a new
Director of Nurses who is reported to be doing very well. There are
a few vacant positions but these are not affecting the overall care
and comfort of the residents.

   8.  There were no hospitalizations due to abuse or neglect. All
physician and hospital visits were scheduled and/or routine.  The
management and clinicians, including the nursing staff, reported no
concerns with physician communications, visits, prescribed meds or
other matters pertaining to the quality of patient care.

   9. In sum, there has been some staff turnover, although there
are no concerns at this time regarding the quality of patient care
at the Debtor's facility.  Residents observed and interviewed
expressed great satisfaction with their care and the environment.
Regional Coordinator did not observe any conditions that required
attention.  There does not appear to be any level of associated
abuse, neglect or exploitation or any decline or concern in care or
quality of life.   

A full-text copy of the PCO'sReport is available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/nmb16-13005-99.pdf

Heartland Care, Inc., dba Heartland Companions and Homemakers, dba
Heartland Continuing Care Center Nursing Home, fdba Heartland Care
of Hobbs, dba Heartland Continuing Care Center, fdba Heartland Care
of Artesia, filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.N.M.
Case No. 16-13005) on December 2, 2016.
The Debtor's Counsel is Bonnie P. Bassan, Esq., Daniel J Behles,
Esq., and George M Moore, Esq., at Moore, Bassan & Behles, P.C., in
Albuquerque, New Mexico.  At the time of filing, the Debtor had
estimated assets of $0 to $50,000 and estimated liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  The petition was signed by Ranelle Tweedy,
president.


HEAVENLY COUTURE: Committee Taps Fox Rothschild as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Heavenly Couture,
Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California to hire Fox Rothschild LLP as its
legal counsel.

The firm will advise the committee regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; investigate the conduct and financial condition of
the Debtor; assist in the investigation of potential claims;
negotiate and pursue confirmation of a bankruptcy plan; and provide
other legal services related to the Debtor's Chapter 11 case.

Michael Sweet, Esq., and Nathan Schultz, Esq., the attorneys who
are anticipated to handle the case, charge $650 per hour and $625
per hour, respectively.  The hourly fees for paralegals and law
clerks range from $135 to $385.

Fox Rothschild does not represent any other entity having an
adverse interest in connection with the Debtor's case, according to
court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Michael A. Sweet, Esq.
     Nathan A. Schultz, Esq.
     Fox Rothschild LLP  
     345 California Street, Suite 2200
     San Francisco, CA 94104
     Telephone: (415) 364-5540
     Facsimile: (415) 391-4436
     E-mail: msweet@foxrothschild.com
     E-mail: nschultz@foxrothschild.com

                    About Heavenly Couture Inc.

Heavenly Couture, Inc. -- https://heavenlycouture.com/ -- is a
fashion forward and innovative company providing fashion apparel
and accessories.  It is a small family-owned business that started
as a small boutique in Laguna Beach in 2006.  The company has store
locations throughout California and Florida and also serves its
customers online.

Heavenly Couture sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-11756) on May 14,
2018.  In the petition signed by Jiah Ha, president, the Debtor
disclosed $613,913 in assets and $4.43 million in liabilities.
Judge Theodor Albert presides over the case.  Michael Jones, Esq.,
at M. Jones and Associates, PC, serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.

On June 5, 2018, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.


HOPE INDUSTRIES: Affiliates Commit $14.5K Monthly to Help Fund Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Hope Industries, LLC, filed its first amended disclosure statement
for its first amended plan of reorganization dated July 2, 2018.

The new plan contemplates that the Reorganized Debtor will fund
plan payments with net ongoing rental income, while at the same
time also continuing to market for sale a number of, but not all
of, the properties under listing agreements in the ordinary course.
Debtor believes that being outside court oversight and foreclosure
will produce more interested prospective buyers and interest. All
bidding has been chilled during the court proceedings in Kentucky,
and the North Carolina home has been damaged and under
repair/unable to be shown by the realtor. Secured debt will be paid
down with net proceeds as properties are sold during the Plan term,
in their respective order of priorities, which will affect and
change note balances and change ongoing payments as properties are
sold, paying off some notes or Claims. Debtor is unable to predict
the order of properties selling and the sales amounts, so cannot
accurately project the amount or timing of lump sum payments.

The Affiliates have committed to fund $14,500 per month from their
non-Debtor funds as additional revenues to pay the Claims within
the Plan. Star Robbins & Company, Inc. has filed certain financial
projections evidencing its ability to fund these amounts and has
signed a written commitment along with the Kusiaks to be bound by
the Plan term, submitting to the jurisdiction of this Court as part
of the Plan restructuring.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/kyeb18-60142-139.pdf

A full-text copy of the First Amended Plan is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/kyeb18-60142-140.pdf

                   About Hope Industries

Based in London, Kentucky, Hope Industries, LLC, owns and manages
improved and unimproved real properties in Laurel County, Kentucky.
It also has an interest in improved real property in Whitley
County, Kentucky, and in Fayetteville, North Carolina.   

Hope Industries sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Case No. 18-60142) on Feb. 9,
2018.  In the petition signed by Star Robbins Kusiak, member, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  Judge Gregory R. Schaaf presides over the case.  DelCotto
Law Group PLLC is the Debtor's legal counsel.


HORNE EXCAVATING: Seeks Approval of Cash Collateral Stipulation
---------------------------------------------------------------
Horne Excavating, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Hampshire to approve its Stipulation with
Woodsville Guaranty Savings Bank regarding Horne's use of cash
collateral.

The essential terms of the Stipulation between Horne and
Woodsville, are as follows:

     (a) Horne acknowledges the total balance outstanding under the
Company Loans as of the Petition Date of $559,172, comprised of
$549,263 in principal and $9,910 in accrued interest.

     (b) Horne will make the regular monthly payments due to
Woodsville on the following Company Loans: Loan No. 46903, Loan No.
46902, Loan No. 47967, Loan No. 47971, and Loan No. 49146. All such
loan payments will be made on the due dates reflected in the
pertinent Company Loan Documents.

     (c) Horne will make the following payments on Loan Nos.  49290
and 4400301421: $100 each, every four weeks.

     (d) Woodsville holds a valid, duly perfected enforceable and
non-avoidable security interest in the Cash Collateral.

     (e) Horne will remain current on taxes and retain all
insurance.

     (f) Horne agrees that any turnover of any Cash Collateral
and/or adequate protection payments and any application of the same
by Woodsville to its Loans will not be deemed, in any manner, to
constitute a violation of the automatic stay.

     (g) Usage of Cash Collateral is authorized through Sept. 14,
2018.

     (h) Horne will timely file all operating reports required by
the Bankruptcy Code, Federal or Local Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
or by the United States Trustee, and will deliver a copy of such
reports to Woodsville at the same time that they are served on the
United States Trustee.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/nhb18-10502-51.pdf

                     About Horne Excavating

Horne Excavating, LLC, is an excavating contractor in Haverhill,
New Hampshire. It is a small business debtor as defined in 11
U.S.C. Section 101(51D).  Horne Excavating filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D.N.H. Case No. 18-10502) on April 15, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Kevin Horne, president.  The case is
assigned to Judge Bruce A. Harwood.  Peter N. Tamposi, Esq., of The
Tamposi Law Group, is the Debtor's counsel.


HOTI ENTERPRISES: 2nd Cir. Upholds Dismissal of Suit vs Law Firms
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, affirmed the
order of United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York granting the defendants' motion to dismiss the case
captioned HOTI ENTERPRISES, L.P., Appellant, v. ROBERT L. RATTET,
ESQ., JAMES B. GLUCKMAN, RATTET PASTERNAK, LLP, RATTET PASTERNAK &
GORDON-OLIVER, LLP, Appellees, No. 17-1415 (2nd Cir.) filed by Hoti
Enterprises, L.P.  for lack of standing.

Hoti brought the adversary action in bankruptcy court asserting
various claims against twelve defendants, all of them law firms or
individual lawyers who represented Hoti at various times in the
state court foreclosure action or the Chapter 11 proceedings, or in
both.

Section 4.2 of the Third Modified Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization
for Hoti provides that " GECMC 2007-C1 Burnett Street, LLC shall be
entitled to receive all rights, title, and interest in and to . . .
all Non-Avoidance Causes of Action that the Debtors or the Estates
may have against any Person . . ." free and clear of any other
interests. The bankruptcy court confirmed the Third Amended Plan,
finding that it is "binding on the Debtors, and the confirmation
was affirmed by the district court and this Court, In re Hoti Ents.
L.P. Accordingly, as the bankruptcy court held, Hoti asserts claims
that belong to GECMC under the Third Amended Plan, and therefore
lacks prudential standing.

Hoti advanced a single argument on appeal in the district court:
because the Rattet defendants entered into the cash collateral
order without Hoti's consent and failed to challenge GECMC's
foreclosure action after the filing of the Chapter 11 petition, any
claims resulting from such conduct belong to Hoti and not the
bankruptcy estate. However, the district court determined that
because Hoti failed to raise this argument in the bankruptcy court,
it was waived. Hoti offers no argument disputing the district
court's conclusion. Accordingly, we decline to consider this
argument on appeal.  

The Court considered Hoti's remaining arguments and concludes that
they are without any merit. The judgment of the district court is
affirmed.

A full-text copy of the Court's Order dated July 2, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2NAJALT from Leagle.com.

GUNILLA PEREZ-FARINGER; White Plains, NY., for Appellant.

ROBERT J. BERGSON, Abrams, Garfinkel Margolis Bergson, LLP; New
York, NY., for Appellees.

                  About Hoti Enterprises

Harrison, New York-based Hoti Enterprises, LP, is a single asset
real estate holding company that owns an apartment complex located
at 2801 Fillmore Avenue, 3001 Avenue R and 2719 Fillmore Avenue --
collectively, known as 1865 Burnett Street -- in Brooklyn, New
York.  Hoti Realty Management Co., Inc., was in the business of
owning and operating a management company that managed the
apartment complex.

Hoti filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case No. 10-24129) on Oct. 12, 2010.  Hoti Enterprises estimated
its assets and debts at $10 million to $50 million.  Tanya Dwyer,
Esq., at Dwyer & Associates, LLC, in New York, represents the
Debtors as counsel.

Affiliate Hoti Realty Management Co., Inc. also filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr S.D.N.Y. Case No. 10-24130) on the same day,
listing under $1 million in both assets and debts.

A receiver of rents was appointed against Hoti Enterprises
pre-bankruptcy pursuant to a foreclosure proceeding commenced by
GECMC 2007-C-1 Burnett Street, Hoti's mortgagee and largest secured
creditor.

No Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in
the case.


ILLINI KIDS: Unsecureds to Receive 100% Distribution with Interest
------------------------------------------------------------------
Illini Kids Development Company, LLC filed a disclosure statement
in support if its plan of reorganization dated, July 1, 2018, which
proposes to pay Class 4 general unsecured creditors 100% of their
allowed claims, with interest, to be distributed after the close of
an escrow for sale of the California property.

Distributions will occur no later than six months from the
Effective Date of the Plan.

The filing of the Debtor's chapter 11 petition created a bankruptcy
estate, which will continue to exist until confirmation of the
Plan. The Estate consists of all property of the Debtor as of the
Petition Date, the primary such property being the Real Property.
Other such property consists of the Debtor's monetary interest as
lessor in leases of space on the Real Property. The rents collected
by the Debtor after the Petition Date and until confirmation of the
Plan are also property of the Estate. The Real Property, rents, and
proceeds of the Real Property are subject to the security interests
of PMF and the Chen Trust. The Real Property is subject to the
statutory tax lien in favor of the County of Sacramento for unpaid
property taxes and utilities.

To fund disbursements to claim holders under the Plan, the Debtor
is to continue to operate its business and to lease space at the
Real Property following the Confirmation Date. Rents collected from
tenants are to be deposited into the Creditor Account designated in
the Plan, and such funds are to be used to pay expenses associated
with the upkeep and maintenance of the Real Property.

Under the Plan, the Debtor, subject to approval of the Court, is
required to sell or refinance the Real Property, and the Class 2
claims that are secured by the Real Property are to be paid in
full, directly from the sale or refinancing escrow (along with sale
costs). Remaining net proceeds after payment of claims secured by
the Real Property are to be deposited into the Creditor Account,
and from the Creditor Account the Debtor is to pay allowed
unsecured claims and administrative claims in full as provided by
the Plan.

After sale or refinancing of the Real Property, Debtor is to retain
the remainder of the Debtor's assets, including all claims against
third parties, after confirmation of the Plan and after the
Effective Date.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/caeb18-22027-131.pdf

            About Illini Kids Development Company

Illini Kids Development Company, LLC, filed as a single asset real
estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Illini Kids Development Company sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 18-22027) on
April 4, 2018. In the petition signed by Kenneth Cruz, managing
member, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Christopher D.
Jaime presides over the case.


INDIANA HOTEL: Cases vs IAA Remanded to State Court
---------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Thomas J. Tucker entered an order remanding
removed cases back to the state court.

On July 9, 2018, Plaintiff/Debtor Indiana Hotel Equities, LLC
commenced the adversary proceeding captioned INDIANA HOTEL
EQUITIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. INDIANA AIRPORT AUTHORITY, Defendant,
Adv. Pro. No. 18-4307 (Bankr. E.D. Mich.) by filing in the Court a
notice of removal purporting to remove to the Court the following
state court cases now pending in Indiana:

Indiana Hotel Equities, LLC v Indiana Airport Authority, Marion
Superior Court Indiana Trial Court No. 49D01-1707-PL-027076, Court
of Appeals No. 18A-PL-00769

The purported removal is predicated on 28 U.S.C. section 1452(a).
As the Defendant Indiana Airport Authority correctly argues in is
Remand Motion, that statute required the Plaintiff/Debtor to file
its notice of removal in the "district court for the district where
such civil action is pending." That federal judicial district is
the Southern District of Indiana. Thus, the removal notice had to
be filed in the district court for the Southern District of
Indiana. Instead the removal notice was filed in this district, the
Eastern District of Michigan. Because the removal notice was filed
in the wrong district, and because this defect was timely raised by
the Defendant Indiana Airport Authority, the Court will remand the
cases at issue.

The removed cases are, thus, remanded to the Marion County, Indiana
Superior Court, and to the Indiana Court of Appeals, from which
they purportedly were removed.

A copy of the Court's Order dated July 11, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2uXHqy7 from Leagle.com.

Indiana Hotel Equities, LLC, Debtor In Possession, represented by
Robert N. Bassel & Joseph Naif Ejbeh.

             About Indiana Hotel Equities

Indiana Hotel Equities, LLC, is a real estate company whose
principal assets are located at 2500 S. Highschool Road,
Indianapolis, Indiana.

Indiana Hotel Equities sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 18-45185) on April 10,
2018.  In the petition signed by Remo Polselli, principal, the
Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and
liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge Thomas J. Tucker presides
over the case.  The Debtor tapped Robert Bassel, Esq., as its legal
counsel.


INLAND OASIS GROUP: Unsecureds to be Paid in Full Under Latest Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Inland Oasis Group Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Arizona a disclosure statement in support of its
chapter 11 plan dated July 23, 2018.

In this latest filing, the Debtor believes that the figures it has
for its pre-petition income and expenses do not provide a good
baseline for predicting future performance. During 2017, Debtor
moved locations. Further, a portion of these figures were not
compiled by Mr. Mark Vargovich, the Debtor's principal. During
2016, Debtor earned $921,622.72 and incurred expenses of
$923,236.92, for a net loss of $1,614.20. During 2017, Debtor’s
pre-petition earnings were $702,897.87 with expenses of
$700,528.74, for net income of 2,369.13.

Since the case was filed, Debtor has increased its cash on hand
from $353.90 at the end of November 2017 to $29,978.16, an average
increase of $4,232.04 per month.

Class 8 general unsecured creditors will receive a pro rata share
of monthly payments of $3,000 beginning 73 months after the
effective date and continuing until each claim is paid in full.
This claim may be prepaid without penalty at any time, and shall be
paid in full from the proceeds of any Business Sale. This class is
impaired and is entitled to cast a ballot.

The previous version of the plan provided that non-priority
unsecured claims would be paid a rojected 50% of their claims.

A full-text copy of the Latest Disclosure Statement is available
at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb2-17-13376-92.pdf

                  About Inland Oasis Group

Inland Oasis Group, Inc. operates "The Reef" -- a restaurant and
bar located in Chandler, Arizona.  Inland Oasis Group filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 17-13376) on Nov. 9,
2017.  In the petition signed by Mark Vargovich, president, the
Debtor estimated under $50,000 in both assets and liabilities.
Judge Madeleine C. Wanslee presides over the case.  Kelly G. Black,
PLC, is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


INTEGRAL INVESTMENTS: Case Summary & 10 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Integral Investments Prospect, LLC
        1437 N. Prospect Avenue, Suite 100
        Milwaukee, WI 53202-3053

Business Description: Integral Investments Prospect, LLC is a
                      real estate rental agency in Milwaukee,
                      Wisconsin.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 25, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Wisconsin (Milwaukee)

Case No.: 18-27174

Judge: Hon. Michael G. Halfenger

Debtor's Counsel: Jonathan V. Goodman, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES OF JONATHAN V. GOODMAN
                  788 North Jefferson Street
                  Suite 707
                  Milwaukee, WI 53202-3739
                  Tel: 414-276-6760
                  Fax: 414-287-1199
                  E-mail: jgoodman@ameritech.net

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Donald J. Gral, member of manager.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 10 unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

                        http://bankrupt.com/misc/wieb18-27174.pdf


ITM ENTERPRISES: Aug. 8 Plan and Disclosure Statement Hearing
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Mark X. Mullin conditionally approved ITM
Enterprises, LLC's disclosure statement, dated June 28, 2018,
referring to its proposed plan of reorganization.

August 5, 2018 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written acceptances or rejections of the Plan, and the last day for
filing and serving written objections to confirmation of the Plan
or the Disclosure Statement.

August 8, 2018 at 1:30 p .m. is fixed for the hearing on
Confirmation of the Plan and Final Approval of the Disclosure
Statement in the Courtroom of the Honorable Mark X. Mullin, 501
Tenth Street, 1st Floor, Fort Worth Texas.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that the
treatment of Compass Bank’s claims have been amended in the
latest plan.

A full-text copy of the Latest Disclosure Statement dated June 28,
2018 is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb18-40767-11.pdf  

                  About ITM Enterprises

ITM Enterprises, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 18-40767-11) on Feb. 28, 2018.  The
Debtor hired Eric A. Liepins, Esq., at Eric A. Liepins, P.C., as
counsel.


JULIAN DEPOT: Bid to Transfer Suit vs Home Depot to NY Court Nixed
------------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Robert N. Scola denied Julian Depot Miami, LLC's
motion to transfer the case captioned Julian Depot Miami, LLC,
Plaintiff, v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Defendant, Civil Action No.
17-22475-Civ-Scola (S.D. Fla.) to the District Court for the
Southern District of New York.  Julian Depot's motion to for leave
to amend the complaint is also denied.

In this case, Julian Depot Miami, LLC, Home Depot U.S.A.'s
landlord, complains about Home Depot's refusal to rebuild its
home-improvement store after it was damaged by a fire. Alleging
that Home Depot is required by the parties' lease to reconstruct
its building, which has been completely razed, Julian Depot seeks a
declaratory judgment that Home Depot must rebuild its store.
Julian Depot filed a motion to transfer venue and motion for leave
to amend its complaint.

The Court finds that transferring the case, at this point in the
litigation--over a year since it was initiated--would not promote
its efficient resolution. Further, and more importantly, the
parties here incorporated a forum-selection clause into their lease
agreement.

Julian Depot's position hinges on its insistence that this case
constitutes a "core proceeding" for the purposes of its bankruptcy
case. According to Julian Depot, where a case constitutes a core
bankruptcy proceeding, a court may disregard an otherwise valid
forum-selection clause and transfer the case to another forum. This
case, however, is not a core proceeding.

Julian Depot has not made any argument that the forum-selection
clause was induced by either fraud or overreaching. Additionally,
Julian Depot has not indicated that it would in any way be deprived
of its day in court if this case remains before the Court in this
district. Next, Florida law will be applied regardless of whether
this case remains in Florida or is transferred to a federal
district court in New York. Lastly, enforcement of the
forum-selection clause here will not contravene public policy: this
matter is decidedly a non-core proceeding, and Julian Depot has not
made any other public-policy argument. Without more, the Court
finds the parties' forum-selection clause controls and denies
Julian Depot's attempt to transfer this case to New York.

And because the Court finds Julian Depot has not established the
good cause necessary to modify the Court's scheduling order, it
also denies Julian Depot's motion for leave to amend its
complaint.

A full-text copy of the Court's Omnibus Order dated July 12, 2018
is available at https://bit.ly/2Nx2WkI from Leagle.com.

Julian Depot Miami, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Glen H. Waldman
-- gwaldman@waldmanbarnett.com -- Waldman Barnett, P.L. & Michael
Allen Azre -- mazre@hellerwaldman.com -- Heller Waldman, P.L.

Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Defendant, represented by David E. Gurley
-- dgurley@GurleyAssociates.com -- Gurley & Associates.

               About Julian Depot Miami

Julian Depot Miami LLC is a New York-based Florida limited
liability company, with its business offices located in Queens, New
York.  It is a real estate company which owns a commercial property
located at 13895 SW 28th Street, Homestead, Florida.  The property,
which Julian Depot Miami purchased in 2012, is subject to a ground
lease dated Dec. 20, 2016, with Home Depot USA, Inc., as tenant.
Its principals are affiliated with the prior Chapter 11 case of HS
45 John LLC (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-10368).  Julian Depot
Miami has only one secured creditor, U.S. Bank, which holds a first
mortgage in the principal amount of $13.2 million.

Julian Depot Miami sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-12973) on Oct. 23,
2017.  David L. Smith, manager, signed the petition.  At the time
of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $17.55 million in assets and
$13.22 million in liabilities.  Judge Sean H. Lane presides over
the case.  Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP is the Debtor's
counsel.


JXB 84 LLC: Must Substantiate Alleged Cash Collateral Discrepancies
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. A. Jay Cristol of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida directs JXB 84 LLC to forthwith,
clarify, explain, reconcile, and provide documents substantiating
alleged discrepancy in both the amount of rents received and the
amount of the deposit received, either by amending the Monthly
Operating Reports, amending the schedules, and/or by filing an
accounting of the gross amounts received.

Once the Debtor secures insurance on the property, the Debtor is
also directed to provide the United States Trustee and Deutsche
Bank with a copy of the insurance certificate, certifying that
there is insurance coverage on the property, listing Deutsche Bank
as loss payee, and adding the U.S. Trustee as certificate holder
for notice and information purposes.

There have been allegations of the existence of discrepancies in
both the amount of rents received and the amount of the deposit
received, as the Debtor reports certain amounts in the Motion and
in the Debtor's Monthly Operating Reports, which differ to the
amounts disclosed in the Debtor's bankruptcy schedules and the
testimony at the Section 341 Meeting of Creditors.

The Court notes that Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as
Trustee, in Trust for Registered Holders of Long Beach Mortgage
Loan Trustee 2005-WL2, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-WL2
has filed an objection to Debtor's Expedited Motion For the Use of
Rents, To Use Cash Collateral, and Granting Adequate Protection,
and to Authorize Payment of Fees From the Sale Deposit.

The Court also learned from counsel for the United States Trustee
that the property insurance certificate on file expired in April,
2018 and the Debtor has not provided proof of current insurance
coverage.

                        About JXB 84 LLC

JXB 84 LLC is in the real estate business.  JXB 84 LLC's principal
assets are located at 228 Senator St. Brooklyn, NY 11220.  JXB 84
LLC (DE) filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
17-21785) on Sept. 27, 2017.  The petition was signed by Jared
Dotoli, its manager.  The case is assigned to Judge Jay A. Cristol.
The Debtor is represented by Joel M. Aresty, Esq., at Joel M.
Aresty P.A.  At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated $1 million
to $10 million in assets and $500,000 to $1 million in liabilities.


KAHLON ENTERPRISES: 4911 Buckeye Buying Emmaus Properties for $1.8M
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kahlon Enterprises, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania to authorize the Real Estate
Purchase Agreement with to 4911 Buckeye Road, LLC in connection
with the sale of two parcels of real property: (i) 4911 Buckeye
Road, Emmaus, Pennsylvania, Parcel 21-548369280577-1, and (ii) 3951
Tank Farm Road, Emmaus, Pennsylvania, Parcel 21-548359963359-1, for
$1.8 million.

The Debtor believes the collective value of the Properties is $1.8
million, which is the value reflected on its Schedule A/B.

The Properties are secured by first liens in favor of Summitbridge
National Investments V, LLC.  The Debtor owes Summitbridge $2.7
million.

The Debtor is affiliated with an entity called Kahlon Powersports,
Inc., which operates its business at the Properties.  Kahlon
Powersports has entered into an asset purchase agreement to sell
substantially all of its assets to Greater Lehigh Valley
Powersports, LLC, which is an affiliate of the Purchaser.

The Debtor and the Purchaser negotiated and executed the Real
Estate Purchase Agreement.  An Amendment to the Purchase Agreement
modifies the closing date of the sale on July 31, 2018.  The
Purchase Agreement provides for the sale of the Properties to the
Purchaser for the total purchase price of $1.8 million, free and
clear of lien, claims and encumbrances.

Time is of the essence in the transaction.  The Purchase Agreement
contains an outside closing date of July 31, 2018.  The Debtor is
not an operating business and has minimal cash to continue the
administration of this chapter 11 case.  It wishes to move
expeditiously in order to prevent a further deterioration in any
value to the Properties.  Both the Debtor and the Purchaser intend
to close on the sale of the Properties as soon as possible after
the Court approves the Purchase Agreement.  Consequently, a waiver
of Rule 6004(h) stay is in the best interest of the Debtor and the
estate.

The Purchaser:

          4911 BUCKEYE ROAD, LLC
          104 Awol Rd.
          Jonestown, PA 17038
          Telephone: (717) 813-1298
          Facsimile: (717) 813-1298

                    About Kahlon Enterprises

Kahlon Enterprises, LLC, based in Emmaus, PA, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 18-12821) on April 27, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Steven B. Kahlon, member, the Debtor
estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.
The Hon. Richard E. Fehling presides over the case.  Thomas D.
Bielli, Esq., at Bielli & Klauder, LLC, serves as bankruptcy
counsel.


KAMA MANAGEMENT: Plan and Disclosures Hearing Set for Aug. 29
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Mildred Caban Flores issued an order conditionally
approving Kama Management, Inc.'s disclosure statement, dated June
21, 2018, describing its chapter 11 plan.

Acceptances or rejections of the Plan may be filed in writing by
the holders of all claims on/or before 14 days prior to the date of
the hearing on confirmation of the Plan.

Any objection to the final approval of the Disclosure Statement
and/or the confirmation of the Plan must be filed on/or before 14
days prior to the date of the hearing on confirmation of the Plan.

A hearing for the consideration of the final approval of the
Disclosure Statement and the confirmation of the Plan will be held
on August 29, 2018, at 09:00 A.M. at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court,
Jose V. Toledo U.S. Post Office and Courthouse Building, 300
Recinto Sur Street, Courtroom 3, Third Floor, San Juan, Puerto
Rico.

As previously reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, the
aggregate dividend to Class 4 general unsecured creditors under the
latest plan is fixed in the amount of $30,000 with payments to be
distributed pro-rata to these creditors.  

A copy of the amended disclosure statement is available for free
at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb16-08008-164.pdf

                     About Kama Management

Kama Management Inc., a "small business debtor", filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 16-08008) on Oct. 5, 2016. Alberto
Perez Pujals, president, signed the petition.  At the time of
filing, the Debtor disclosed total liabilities of $1.45 million.  

Judge Mildred Caban Flores presides over the case.  The Debtor
hired Lugo Mender Group, LLC as its legal counsel.

The Debtor filed a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization and disclosure
statement.


KENNEWICK PUBLIC: PCO Files 6th Interim Report
----------------------------------------------
Susan N. Goodman, RN JD as the Patient Care Ombudsman to Kennewick
Public Hospital District, engaged in a brief sixth site visit;
scheduled relative to the plan confirmation hearing in case a court
appearance was requested. The Sixth Report is submitted in
compliance with 11 U.S.C. Section 333(b)(2), yet in anticipation of
imminent sale transition effective July 31, 2018.

Patient census was not particularly heavy at the time of the PCO's
visit, although the PCO confirmed that patient transfers were
continuing when needed if additional staff were not readily
available during census surges.  The duties of the unit director
who resigned around the time of the PCO's Fifth Report were
absorbed across multiple unit managers in the interim until  that
position is replaced.  Additionally, the Chief Nursing Officer
("CNO") who was the PCO's primary leadership contact, resigned this
reporting cycle with interim duties assumed by the former Home
Health Director who remained with the Debtor's organization after
that business unit was sold.  Staff also reported that an
experienced admission team member had resigned.  The PCO was unable
to confirm whether or not this departure could be attributed to
bankruptcy fatigue.  
  
Clinical staff continued to report availability of essential
supplies, while recognizing some equipment and supply timing delays
relative to cash management needs.  All staff and  leadership
interviewed denied patient impact related to supplies or staffing.
The captive monitor displays, commonly referred to as "slave
monitors," were not working at the time of the PCO's site visit.
Before the filing of this report, one monitor was in place with
plans to get the other two monitors working before month end.
Surgical sterilization equipment challenges were reported,although
resolving by the time of the PCO's visit and deemed unrelated to
the bankruptcy process.

Generally, the focus of staff concerns had shifted from "making it
through to sale" to understanding the personal impact of sale
finalization on employment and benefits.  Staff whose unions did
not reach an agreement with the purchaser expressed additional
uncertainty relative to these topics.

Patient and physician interviews remained status quo.  The PCO
engaged one particular physician specialist to confirm continued
availability of prescription writing authority for  patients
requiring particular medications that may be subject to the FDA's
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy ("REMS") program.  While
the specialist was still working through logistics regarding
licensed nursing office support, no immediate concerns were
reported and prescribing authority was confirmed.

The PCO followed up telephonically with site leadership regarding
operational feedback and engaged in a transition call with the
Interim Chief Nursing Officer.  The PCO is keenly aware of the many
individual contributions that were responsible for maintaining
quality patient care during this long bankruptcy journey and
collectively acknowledges them.

A full-text copy of the PCO's Sixth Interim Report is available for
free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/waeb17-02025-1016.pdf

        About Kennewick Public Hospital District

Originally established in 1948, Kennewick Public Hospital District,
doing business as Trios Health, owns and operates a multi-faceted
public healthcare system primarily serving residents in Kennewick,
Pasco, Richland, and surrounding communities.

Kennewick -- http://www.trioshealth.org/-- is one of the largest
multi-specialty medical groups in Eastern Washington.  It has two
hospitals and multiple urgent and outpatient care centers, which
together provide inpatient and outpatient services at 12 different
locations in the city of Kennewick.  Kennewick maintains a
workforce of approximately 1,104 employees, including medical staff
comprising over 89 providers.

Kennewick is a "municipality" as defined in Section 101(40) of the
Bankruptcy Code.  It is a "public hospital district," a form of
municipal corporation authorized under Washington's Public Hospital
Districts Act.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. E.D. Wash. Case No. 17-02025) on June 30, 2017.  The
petition was signed by Craig Cudworth, chief executive officer.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets and liabilities of $100 million to $500 million.

Foster Pepper PLLC represents the Debtor as bankruptcy counsel.
Garden City Group is the Debtor's claims and noticing agent.

On September 1, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.


KII LIQUIDATING: Court Junks Committee Suit vs Victory Park, et al.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Kevin J. Carey granted the Defendants' motion and
dismissed the adversary proceeding captioned The Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors of Katy Industries, Inc., et al., Plaintiff,
v. Victory Park Capital Advisors, LLC; Victory Park Management,
LLC; VPC SBIC I, L.P.; Jansan Acquisition, LLC; and Charles Asfour,
Defendants,  Adv. No. 17-50937 (KJC) (Bankr. D. Del.).

On August 11, 2016, Victory Park and Debtors Katy Industries and
affiliates consummated the 2016 Restructuring, entering into the
fourth amendment to the Second Lien Agreement. Under the Fourth
Amendment, among other things, Victory Park advanced an additional
$5.75 million to Katy 2016 and the parties entered into a stock
purchase agreement, in which Victory Park purchased all of a Katy
affiliated holding company's convertible preferred stock As part of
the Stock Purchase Agreement, all of Katy's directors, other than
its Chief Executive Officer, resigned, and the CEO appointed
Charles Asfour as one of the replacements. On August 30, 2016,
Asfour was named Chairman of Katy's Board of Directors.

On April 3, 2017, Victory Park and the Debtors executed the sixth
amendment to the Second Lien Agreement. Under the Sixth Amendment,
Victory Park advanced an additional $1 million to the Debtors
which, like the July 2016 Advance and the August 2016 Advance, was
payable in a single balloon payment of principal and accrued PIK
interest at maturity. Collectively, these three advances are
central to the issues raised by the Complaint.

On July 12, 2017, the Debtors filed their Notice of Successful
Bidder and Cancellation of Auction, which indicated that Jansan's
bid was the only qualified bid received by the deadline;
accordingly, the Debtors did not conduct an auction. The Court
entered the Sale Order on July 18, 2017, approving the final form
of the Debtors' amended and restated asset purchase agreement with
Jansan.

On July 25, 2017, the Committee filed the Complaint against Victory
Park, Jansan and Charles Asfour. The Complaint contains six counts
in total. Counts I and II allege that the advances paid by Victory
Park to the Debtors should be recharacterized as equity
investments, or in the alternative, subordinated. Statutorily,
Counts I and II are premised on a claim objection pursuant to 11
U.S.C. sections 105(a) and 502(b)(1), and equitable subordination.
Count III is for avoidance of the advances and the Uniform
Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA). Count IV is also for avoidance of
the advances. Count V is for recovery of the avoided transfers
which is contingent upon the previous counts. Finally, Count VI
alleges that Asfour breached his fiduciary duty of loyalty owed to
Katy and the Debtors.

Counts I and II seek to recharacterize the advances as equity or,
in the alternative, subordinate the advances, effectively
eliminating Jansan's ability to credit bid $7.5 million of the
Purchase Price.

The Court finds that Jansan's bid was the only qualified bid
received by the deadline, with a Purchase Price of approximately
$63 million. Under the APA, Jansan credit bid and offset
approximately $36.7 million of the Purchase Price; the assumed
liabilities make up the remaining $26.3 million balance. As the
Defendants specifically argued throughout their papers and during
Oral Argument, even if $7.5 of Jansan's credit bid is disqualified
(the amount of the Advances), Jansan would have simply gone to
market with $29.2 million in section 363(k) currency and $55.5
million collectively as its bid. Given the lack of alternative
qualified bidders, $55.5 million would still have been the
successful bid. Accordingly, reshaping the economics of the deal to
reflect a hypothetical reduction of $7.5 million in section 363(k)
currency would have no tangible, ameliorative effect for the
Committee.

Counts III, IV, and V fail independently. Count III asserts a claim
for avoidance based upon 11 U.S.C. section 544. However, section
544 applies only to prepetition transfers of property, whereas the
disputed transfer of property in question here, the credit bid of
the Advances, occurred postpetition pursuant to the Sale Order.52
Count IV asserts a claim for avoidance based upon 11 U.S.C. section
549. However, section 549 is applicable only to post-petition
transfers that have not been authorized by the court. The Sale
Order specifically authorized the credit bidding of the Advances,
the property transfers in question. Finally, Count V is a
contingent claim for recovery upon the success of Count III or IV.
Therefore, Count V necessarily fails as well.

The Committee necessarily has not stated a claim upon which relief
may be granted and the motion to dismiss with regard to Counts I,
II, III, IV, and V is granted with prejudice. Count VI also fails
to allege sufficiently a violation of the corporate opportunity
doctrine or a failure to disclose. The motion to dismiss,
therefore, is granted, in its entirety, with prejudice.

A copy of the Court's Opinion dated July 6, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2uWAyB5 from Leagle.com.

Katy Industries Inc., et al, Debtor, represented by Stuart M. Brown
-- stuart.brown@dlapiper.com -- DLA Piper LLP.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Katy Industries,
Inc., et al., Plaintiff, represented by Joseph N. Argentina, Jr. --
joseph.argentina@dbr.com -- Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Andrew J.
Flame – Andrew.flame@dbr.com -- Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP,
Patrick A. Jackson –- Patrick.jackson@dbr.com Drinker Biddle &
Reath LLP, Steven K. Kortanek -- steven.kortanek@dbr.com -- Drinker
Biddle & Reath LLP & Robert K. Malone -- Robert.malone@dbr.com --
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.
Victory Park Capital Advisors LLC, Defendant, pro se.

Victory Park Management, LLC, Defendant, pro se.

VPC SBIC I, L.P., Defendant, pro se.

Jansan Acquisition, LLC, Defendant, represented by Robert Alan
Weber, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP.

Charles Asfour, Defendant, pro se.

US Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Brya Michele Keilson ,
Office of the United States Trustee U. S. Department of Justice.

                  About Katy Industries

Katy Industries, Inc. -- http://www.katyindustries.com/-- a
publicly traded Delaware corporation, and its wholly-owned direct
and indirect subsidiaries were organized as a Delaware corporation
in 1967.  The Company is a well-known manufacturer, importer, and
distributor of commercial cleaning and consumer storage products as
well as a contract manufacturer of structural foam products. It
distributes its products across the United States and Canada.  It
is best known for such brands as Continental, Huskee, Color Guard,
Wilen, Muscle Mop, Contico, Tuffbin, and SilverWolf, among many
others.

The Company operates three manufacturing facilities located in
Jefferson City, Missouri, Tiffin, Ohio, and Fort Wayne, Indiana,
with its corporate headquarters located in St. Louis, Missouri.

Katy Industries, Inc., and its affiliates filed a voluntary
petition for relief under the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 17-11101) on May 14, 2017.  In the petition signed by CRO
Lawrence Perkins, Katy Industries disclosed $821,321 in assets and
$58,421,346 in liabilities.

Stuart M. Brown, Esq., at DLA Piper LLP (US), is the Debtors'
bankruptcy counsel.  JND Corporate Restructuring is the claims and
noticing agent.

M.J. Renick & Associates LLC has been appointed by the Court as fee
examiner.

On July 31, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee formed a committee
of retirees.  The Retirees' Committee retained Womble Carlyle
Sandridge & Rice, LLP, as legal counsel.


LAUNCH SPORT: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Launch Sport Performance PC.

                  About Launch Sport Performance

Launch Sport Performance, P.C. -- http://www.launchsp.com/-- is a
privately-held company that offers physical therapy, strength and
conditioning, team training, massage therapy and nutrition
services.  Located at 2600 Tower Oaks Boulevard, the company
operates out of an 11,000 square foot facility fully equipped with
the most current, state-of-the-art sport performance and
rehabilitation equipment available.  Launch Sport Performance has
partnered with many local athletic teams to bring athletes the best
off-field training.

Launch Sport Performance, P.C., based in Rockville, MD, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-17258) on May 30,
2018.  In the petition signed by Dr. Liz Wheeler, president, the
Debtor estimated up to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  The Hon. Thomas J. Catliota presides over
the case.  Steven H. Greenfeld, Esq., at Cohen Baldinger &
Greenfield, LLC, serves as bankruptcy counsel.


LIGHTSTONE GENERATION: Moody's Affirms Ba3 Rating on Secured Loans
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed the Ba3 rating on Lightstone
Generation LLC's (Lightstone or Project or Borrower) senior secured
credit facilities following the planned addition of $300 million to
the term loan B. After the incremental debt, the senior secured
credit facilities will consist of a $1,862 million term loan B due
in 2024, a $100 million term loan C for cash collateralized letters
of credit due in 2024, and a $100 million revolving credit facility
due in 2022. The rating outlook is stable.

Proceeds from the incremental debt plus $75 million in cash on the
balance sheet will be used to pay a one-time dividend of $375
million to the Sponsors of Lightstone, a joint venture owned by
affiliates of Blackstone Group LP (50%) (Blackstone) and ArcLight
Capital Partners LLC (50%) (ArcLight). In addition to the higher
debt amount, certain provisions of the credit agreement are being
amended, including a change in the existing cash flow sweep
mechanism to the greater of (a) 75% of excess cash flow and (b) the
amount needed to be swept to reach a target debt balance.

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Lightstone Generation LLC

Outlook, Remains Stable

Affirmations:

Issuer: Lightstone Generation LLC

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facilities, Affirmed Ba3

RATINGS RATIONALE

Lightstone's Ba3 rating reflects the capacity revenue visibility
that exists across the Project's generating portfolio over the next
three and a half years, which provides a degree of cash flow
certainty to near-term financial performance. The rating also
considers the competitive position of this diversified portfolio of
assets consisting of a large coal-fired generating asset and a
fleet of natural gas-fired assets, the stable operating performance
of the plants, the fleet's ability to generate positive cash flow,
Moody's belief that the maintenance history on these plants has
been quite strong, and that the portfolio will remain in compliance
with PJM capacity performance requirements.

In addition to the portfolio's sound operational performance, which
Moody's believes will continue, the rating action considers its
expectations for relatively predictable financial performance with
credit metrics in the Ba rating category under the Power Generation
Projects methodology over the next few years, even with the tack-on
debt. Moody's notes that the Sponsors have taken distributions
totaling about $185 million (includes tax distributions) since the
original financing closed in early 2017, a credit negative. Also,
the use of proceeds from the incremental debt offering plus $75
million of excess cash will be paid as a distribution to the
Sponsors. While the amount of capital that will be returned to the
Sponsors is material relative to the amount of debt that has been
repaid, the Ba3 rating recognizes the cash flow profile of the
portfolio, which has been relatively resilient, the competitive
positioning of the Gavin power plant relative to other coal-fired
generation assets in PJM, and Moody's belief that capital
investments contemplated by the Sponsors will improve cost
efficiencies, operating performance, and capacity performance
across the fleet resulting in stronger operating margins and
sustained cash flow generation.

These strengths, which underpin the Ba3 rating, are balanced
against the Project's ongoing exposure to cash flow volatility from
non-capacity revenue margins as a largely merchant generation
portfolio, as well as the corporate-like flexibility incorporated
in the financing documents with regard to the ability to incur
incremental leverage and the lack of a meaningful financial
covenant.

Expected Financial Performance

Lightstone's projected financial metrics, such as its ratio of
project cash from operations to debt (Project CFO/Debt), its debt
service coverage ratio (DSCR), the ratio of debt to EBITDA
(Debt/EBITDA), and the amount of debt that will be repaid via an
annual sweep of excess cash flows are highly dependent on market
conditions for the sale of energy and capacity and the purchase of
fuel for the portfolio.

The assumed operating profile of the plants, including their
expenses for operations and maintenance as well as their capacity
factors and heat rates, are also key determinants of Lightstone's
future cash flow. As part of the incremental debt offering,
management has made assumptions about improving capacity factors
and generation, particularly at the Gavin plant, resulting from
certain optimization strategies, capital improvements and variable
operating cost reductions that are currently under way.

Under Moody's base case assumptions, Moody's generally supports the
expected cost benefits and likely incremental improvements
associated with the capital investments contemplated by the
Sponsors. That said, Moody's base case incorporates capacity
factors at Gavin hovering modestly better than the plant's most
recent operating performance (i.e., lower than management
expectations), higher annual operating and maintenance expenses
across the fleet, and a capacity auction clearing price that is 20%
below that most recent RTO auction price for the last eighteen
months of the debt term. Factoring to these broad assumptions, the
Project's three-year average DSCR after all capital expenditures
(including growth capex) are subtracted from cash available for
debt service is expected to be 2.21x. Also, the three-year average
Project CFO/Debt is expected to be 13.1%, while the ratio of total
Debt to EBITDA on a three-year average basis is anticipated to be
4.25x. These anticipated metrics all score in the Ba range under
Moody's rating methodology. Additionally, Moody's anticipates that
65% of total debt, including the incremental $300 million of
tack-on debt, is expected to remain outstanding at debt maturity
under its base case, which could result in some refinancing risk if
future capacity prices and/or spark spreads are lower than
expected.

Structural Considerations

The lenders benefit from some traditional project financing
features including a trustee administered cash flow waterfall of
accounts, a six-month debt service reserve fund, a pledge of the
assets and the Sponsor's ownership interests in the plants.

Debt is repaid quarterly via a 1% scheduled amortization. There is
also a mandatory annual cash sweep equal to the greater of (a) 75%
of excess cash flow and (b) the amount needed to be swept to get to
a target debt balance. The terms and conditions of the transaction
structure do not have a financial covenant on the term loan, which
is a credit weakness.

There is a minimum DSCR financial covenant of 1.1x that applies to
the revolving credit facility, but only when it is 35% drawn,
excluding $15 million used for the issuance of LCs, which
effectively makes the covenant apply after 50% of the revolver has
been utilized (including LC's of $15MM), an unlikely scenario. In
addition, the Project has corporate-like flexibility in its
financial terms and conditions with regard to the incurrence of
additional indebtedness as Lightstone may incur pari passu debt up
to 4.25x Net Debt to EBITDA calculated on a rolling four quarters
basis. That said, the issuance of such incremental debt is subject
to each rating agency's affirmation of its then existing rating
after consideration of the proposed debt issuance.

Rating Outlook

The rating outlook is stable reflecting Lightstone's competitive
advantages, its position within the PJM market, and its historical
ability to generate ongoing cash flow to withstand the volatility
associated with operating as an entirely merchant generator. The
outlook also assumes the plants will continue to be operated in a
way that is consistent with past operating performance, and that
planned investments in the assets will lower operating costs,
improve capacity factors, and strengthen operating cash flow.

Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Given the potential merchant cash flow volatility, the incremental
debt being incurred, and the planned use of such proceeds plus
balance sheet cash for a large distribution, the rating is not
likely to be adjusted upward in the near-term. If, however,
Lightstone is able to consistently generate cash flow in excess of
Moody's base case expectations, there could be upward pressure on
the rating. For example, if its ratio of Project CFO /Debt were to
be above 20% on a sustained basis, there could be upward rating
pressure.

Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade

Negative pressure could develop if the Lightstone plants were to
experience prolonged operational issues causing a significant
increase in expenses, or if capacity revenues from subsequent
auctions are weaker than expected or if merchant energy gross
margins deteriorate to where Lightstone's cash flow generating is
impaired leading to a sustained deterioration in credit metrics.
For example, the rating could come under pressure should the ratio
of Project CFO/Debt remain below 10% for an extended period.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Power
Generation Projects published in June 2018.

Lightstone is a joint venture owned by affiliates of Blackstone
Group LP (50%) (Blackstone) and ArcLight Capital Partners LLC (50%)
(ArcLight) and consists of a 5.3 GW portfolio of four generation
facilities located in the PJM Interconnection market. The largest
of the four plants is Gavin, a 2,721 MW supercritical, pulverized
coal-fired generating station located in Ohio. The other three
plants are natural gas-fired: the 1,211 MW Lawrenceburg
combined-cycle facility in Indiana; the 894 MW Waterford
combined-cycle facility in Ohio; and the 484 MW Darby peaking plant
also in Ohio. All four facilities are located in the AEP-Dayton
zone and bid as a Capacity Performance product into the three-year
forward PJM capacity auction.


LITTLE SAIGON: Litigation Trustee Taps CohnReznick as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------------------
The official appointed to oversee the litigation trust created
under Little Saigon Supermarket LLC's Chapter 11 liquidating plan
seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California to hire an accountant.

Ira Benjamin Katz, the litigation trustee, proposes to employ
CohnReznick LLP to assist in the preparation of tax returns and
provide other tax-related services.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

          Associates            $230 to $285
          Senior Associates     $315 to $405
          Manager               $465 to $525
          Senior Manager        $545 to $570
          Director                   $580
          Partner                    $675

Arnold Anisgarten, a partner at CohnReznick, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm neither holds nor represents any interest
adverse to the Debtor's estate.

The firm can be reached through:

         Arnold Anisgarten
         CohnReznick LLP
         1900 Avenue of the Stars, 28th Floor
         Los Angeles, CA 90067
         Phone: 310-843-9700

                  About Little Saigon Supermarket

Little Saigon Supermarket, LLC, was formed in August 2015 to
develop and operate a Vietnamese supermarket.  Little Saigon on
Nov. 11, 2015, it entered into 15-year lease with HMZ Retail, LP,
concerning the commercial real property located at 10932
Westminster Ave., Garden Grove, California.  Thereafter, it spent
approximately, one year and $1,800,000 in cash designing,
developing and building out the space for a Vietnamese
supermarket.

On Dec. 3, 2016, Little Saigon opened the "Farmer's Garden
Supermarket.  The Westminster address is a central location for the
Vietnamese community in Orange County.

Sun Valley Management, LLC ("SVM") is Little Saigon's Manager and
its sole Class A member.  Huy Dinh Le and Vo Thi Hong Truc are its
Class B members by virtue of their investment under the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services EB-5 Immigrant Investor
Program.

The Market opened in December 2016 and initially operated at a
profit, generating gross sales in its first month of $724,180.
However, gross sales began to drop and along with it, the Market's
profitability.  Having difficulty meeting payroll and falling
behind to vendors, on June 7, 2017, at a Managers meeting of SVM,
the Managers voted to, among other things, (i) close the Market and
start liquidation; (ii) designate Peter Nguyen as the Debtor's
authorizes Representative; and (iii) file for bankruptcy.  On June
26, 2017, the Market closed its doors.

Little Saigon Supermarket sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 17-20227) on Aug. 20, 2017.  Elaine V. Nguyen, Esq.,
at Weintraub Selth and Nguyen, APC, serves as general bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtor.

The court confirmed the Debtor's Chapter 11 plan of liquidation on
March 23, 2018.  

On April 9, 2018, Ira Benjamin Katz accepted the appointment as
trustee of the litigation trust that was created under the
liquidating plan.


LUCKY DRAGON: Plan Discloses Possible End of Hotel Operations
-------------------------------------------------------------
Lucky Dragon Hotel & Casino, LLC, and Lucky Dragon, LP filed their
first amended disclosure statement in support of their chapter 11
plan of reorganization dated July 2, 2018.

In this filing, the Debtor discloses that on June 5, 2018, the
Court denied their request for financing. As a result of the denial
of the Debtors' request for financing, the Debtors project they
will run out of cash in July 2018, and may have to cease operating
the hotel and lay off most or all of its employees. The Debtors are
in active conversations with their equity holders, including the
EB-5 Investors, to obtain funding to maintain hotel operations, as
well as the Las Vegas Property.

The plan also discloses that the Debtors retained Innovation
Capital, LLC as its financial advisor to facilitate its quick
emergence from bankruptcy. The Debtors, through Innovation,
continue to market the Property and the Resort to interested
parties, many of whom expressed interest in the assets and in
amounts that would pay Snow Covered in full. Innovation contacted
296 parties in connection with the marketing of the Debtors'
assets, facilitated the execution of 26 non-disclosure agreements
for parties interested in a purchase or transaction with the
Debtors to review the relevant information necessary for interested
parties to formulate an offer. In addition, 8 parties expressed
interest in the Debtors and their assets, and are currently
negotiating a non-disclosure agreement.

Importantly, through consummation of the Plan, the Debtors
anticipate facilitating a reorganization strategy that not only
protects Snow Covered's secured claims, but provides unsecured
creditors an opportunity to recover for their claims, and gives
EB-5 Investors an opportunity to preserve their investments, to the
extent each are possible. Accordingly, the Debtors believe
confirmation and consummation of the Plan is the best opportunity
for all interested parties to preserve and maximize the value of
the Property and the Resort.

If confirmed and consummated, the Plan will eliminate millions of
dollars of debt from the Debtors' balance sheets and allow a new
party to purchase the Property and assume control of the operations
at the Resort.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb18-10792-538.pdf

                About Lucky Dragon LP
            and Luck Dragon Hotel & Casino

Lucky Dragon, LP, owns the real estate and improvements of the
Lucky Dragon Hotel & Casino located at 300 West Sahara Avenue, Las
Vegas, Nevada, and employs 68 full-time and 30 part-time people.
Lucky Dragon Hotel & Casino, LLC operates the Resort Hotel and
Casino.

The Lucky Dragon Hotel & Casino, LLC, commenced its Chapter 11 case
by filing a voluntary petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 18-10792)
on Feb. 16, 2018.  The Lucky Dragon, LP, filed a voluntary petition
for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev.
Case No. 18-10850) on Feb. 21, 2018.  The cases are jointly
administered under Lucky Dragon Hotel & Casino's Case No.
18-10792.

In the petition signed by Andrew S. Fonfa, managing member of
Eastern Investments, LLC, Lucky Dragon estimated assets of $100
million to $500 million and liabilities of $10 million to $50
million.

Judge Laurel E. Davis presides over the cases.

The Debtors employed Schwartz Flansburg PLLC as their legal lead
counsel; Mushkin Cica Coppedge as conflicts counsel; Innovation
Capital, LLC as financial advisor; and Prime Clerk, LLC, as their
claims and noticing agent.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors retained Levene,
Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP as general bankruptcy counsel;
Armstrong Teasdale LLP as co-counsel; and Kolesar & Leatham, as
Nevada co-counsel.


LUMENTUM HOLDINGS: Moody's Gives Ba3 CFR & Rates Term Loan Ba2
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned first time ratings to the debt
of the Lumentum Holdings, Inc. -- Corporate Family Rating of Ba3
and Probability of Default Rating of Ba3-PD, a Ba2 rating to the
Senior Secured Term Loan B, and a Speculative Grade Liquidity
rating of SGL-2. The rating outlook is stable.

Lumentum intends to use the proceeds of the Term Loan and balance
sheet cash to acquire Oclaro for $5.60 cash and 0.0636 Lumentum
shares per Oclaro share, or about $1.6 billion of equity value.

Assignments:

Issuer: Lumentum Holdings, Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned Ba3-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Assigned SGL-2

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned Ba3

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned Ba2 (LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Lumentum Holdings, Inc.

Outlook, Assigned Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba3 CFR reflects Lumentum's established niche market leadership
position in Telecommunications Optical Components used in optical
communications networks, and Moody's expectation for improving
financial leverage. Debt to EBITDA of about 3.1x (latest twelve
months ended March 31, 2018, proforma for Oclaro, Moody's adjusted
excluding anticipated synergies) at the closing of the acquisition
should decline toward the lower 2x level over the year following
closing as synergies are captured. This level of closing leverage
is modest relative to many similarly-rated issuers and reflects the
large equity component of the Oclaro acquisition, with equity
comprising about $638 million or about 40% of the $1.6 billion
purchase price. Moreover, the acquisition of Oclaro diversifies
Lumentum's revenue base in the optical communications space and
increases scale, raising revenues to about $1.7 billion.

This level of leverage is prudent given the significant execution
risks in integrating Oclaro, which will increase Lumentum's revenue
base by nearly 50%. Lumentum's revenues are volatile due to short
product life cycles, particularly in the Consumer & Industrial
segment due to the large smartphone market exposure, the large
customer concentration to the few optical networking equipment
manufacturers, who are supplied by several other optical components
firms in addition to Lumentum and Oclaro, and the large product
concentration in 3D sensing chips for the smartphone market, which
Moody's estimates accounts for about 20% of the $1.7 billion of
proforma revenues. Revenues in individual segments are volatile due
to end market demand, which is driven by data center infrastructure
upgrade cycles, and the small number of product families. Free cash
flow ("FCF") is also volatile due to the moderate capital intensity
of both Lumentum and Oclaro, reflecting integrated manufacturing
supplemented by contract manufacturing partners.

The Ba2 rating on the proposed Term Loan reflects the collateral,
comprised of a first priority lien on the company's assets, and
large cushion of unsecured liabilities, including the $450 million
convertible notes. Lumentum's SGL-2 speculative grade liquidity
("SGL") rating reflects Lumentum's good liquidity profile. Although
Lumentum does not maintain access to a revolving credit facility,
Moody's expects annual FCF to be in excess of $175 million annually
and at least $450 million of cash to be maintained on the balance
sheet.

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's expectation of mid to
high single digit percentage revenue growth, the EBITDA margin
improving towards the upper twenties percent level (Moody's
adjusted), and FCF in excess of $175 million annually. The outlook
also incorporates Moody's expectation that Lumentum will integrate
Oclaro into its operations over the next year without material
disruption to operations. Moody's expects that Lumentum will
prioritize debt reduction and will capture operating expense
synergies, such that debt to EBITDA (Moody's adjusted) will decline
towards the low 2x level over the year following closing.

The ratings could be upgraded if (i) Lumentum successfully
integrates Oclaro without material operational disruption (ii)
revenue growth is sustained at least in the mid-single digits
percent and is balanced across business segments (iii) product and
customer diversification improves and (iv) anticipated cost
synergies are captured such that the EBITDA margin (Moody's
adjusted) is sustained above 20% and debt reduction is prioritized,
with debt to EBITDA (Moody's adjusted) maintained below 2x.

The ratings could be downgraded if (i) revenues fail to increase by
at least the low single-digits percent (ii) Lumentum experiences
operational disruptions in its integration of Oclaro (iii).
customer or product revenue concentration increases or (iv)
Lumentum engages in shareholder-friendly actions while leverage
exceeds 3x debt to EBITDA (Moody's adjusted).

The principal methodology used in these ratings was the
Semiconductor Industry published in December 2015.

Lumentum Holdings, Inc., based in Milpitas, California,
manufactures and sells optical semiconductor components used in
optical networking communications equipment and industrial lasers
used in precision manufacturing.

Oclaro, Inc., based in San Jose, California, manufactures and sells
optical semiconductor chips used in optical networking
communications equipment.


MANUS SUDDRETH: Trustee Selling Real Properties for $4.5M
---------------------------------------------------------
W.P.I.P., Inc., Patapsco Excavating, Inc., and Patapsco
Excavating/Silverlake, Inc., ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland to authorize their sale outside the ordinary
course of business of one or more parcels of real property owned by
the Debtors for an aggregate purchase price of $4,488,166, subject
to higher and better offers.

Manus Edward Suddreth is the sole shareholder of the Debtors.  As a
result of the Suddreth bankruptcy case, all rights and powers of
Suddreth with respect to the Debtors flow to Charles R. Goldstein,
the Chapter 11 Trustee.  On May 23, 2018, the Court entered orders
on the dockets of each of the Debtors' cases and in the Suddreth
Case jointly administering their cases with the Suddreth Case.

The Trustee conducted a search for all real property owned by the
Debtors in Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Dorchester, Somerset, Talbot
and Worcester Counties and the City of Baltimore.  As a result of
this search, and based on the information available to the Trustee,
the Trustee identified seven properties owned by the Debtors in
Maryland, six of which are included in the Properties proposed to
be sold.

In addition, the Trustee obtained a title search with respect to
each of the properties owned by the Debtors.  As a result of the
title searches, and based on the information available to the
Trustee, the Trustee identified numerous potential Encumbrances
with respect to the Properties.

The Properties, which the Debtors want to sell pursuant to this
motion, and the potential Encumbrances on each Property are
identified.  Inclusion in the lists of potential Encumbrances does
not constitute an admission by the Trustee or the Debtors that each
item is in fact a valid lien, claim, encumbrance or other interest
on or against some or all of the Properties.  Other than as set
forth in the Motion and in orders approving the sales, all
Encumbrances will attach to the sale proceeds to the same extent
and in the same priority as they existed prior to any sale, and the
Trustee will hold the net sale proceeds pending further order of
the Court.

WPIP owns and asks to sell these properties in Baltimore City and
Baltimore County, Maryland: (i) 601 West Patapsco Avenue, Baltimore
City, 13.805 acres, Tax ID Number 25-05-7612G-001; and (ii)
Patapsco Avenue, Baltimore County, Parcel 0250, 19.2567 acres, Tax
ID Number 13-19-00006824.

Upon information and belief, these entities have Encumbrances, or
have asserted Encumbrances, on the WPIP Properties:

     a. Secured Party: Manus Edward Suddreth
        Collateral: Patapsco Avenue, Parcel 0250, Baltimore County
        Description: Deed of Trust recorded June 4, 1998 (Book
12907, Page 289)
        Amount in Deed of Trust: $86,230
        Status: Suddreth has waived this claim

     b. Secured Party: Manus Edward Suddreth
        Collateral: Patapsco Avenue, Parcel 0250, Baltimore County
        Description: Deed of Trust recorded June 4, 1998 (Book
12907, Page 304)
        Amount in Deed of Trust: $115,200
        Status: Suddreth has waived this claim

     c. Secured Party: JACE Note, LLC, assignee of CFS-4 II, LLC,
assignee of
        First National Bank as successor in interest to Baltimore
County Savings Bank
        Collateral: both WPIP Properties
        Description: Indemnity Deed of Trust recorded July 24, 2008
(Baltimore City Book 10875, Page 636; Baltimore County Book 27200,
Page 363)
        Amount in Deed of Trust: $1,250,000
        Additional Description: Notice of Recorded Judgment entered
Aug. 23, 2010 in Baltimore County (Case Number 03-C-10-010029) and
Dec. 6, 2010 in Baltimore City (Case Number 24-C-10-006104)
        Amount of Judgment: $1,435,344
        Status: The Trustee objected to the amount of the claim
filed by JACE Note, LLC.

     d. Secured Party: CFS-4 II, LLC, assignee of First National
Bank as successor in interest to Baltimore County Savings Bank
        Collateral: both WPIP Properties
        Description: Notice of Recorded Judgment entered Sept. 7,
2010 in Baltimore County (Case Number 03-C-10-010551) and Nov. 19,
2010 in Baltimore City (Case Number 24-C-10-006207)
        Amount of Judgment: $1,530,671
        Status: The Trustee has requested from CFS-4 II, LLC
documentation to substantiate the amount of its claim.

     e. Secured Party: B.P.I. Patapsco, LLC
        Collateral: 601 West Patapsco Avenue, Baltimore City
        Description: Deed of Trust recorded February 13, 2013 (Book
14961, Page 171)
        Amount in Deed of Trust: $15,000
        Status: The Trustee and the Debtors are investigating the
claim asserted by BPI Patapsco.

     f. Secured Party: Mark Einstein
        Collateral: 601 West Patapsco Avenue, Baltimore City
        Description: Deed of Trust recorded February 13, 2013 (Book
14961, Page 204)
        Amount in Deed of Trust: $5,000
        Status: The Trustee and the Debtors are investigating the
claim asserted by Einstein.

     g. Secured Party: United States of America
        Collateral: 601 West Patapsco Avenue, Baltimore City
        Description: Notice of Federal Tax Lien issued Sept. 29,
2015 (Case Number 24-L-15-010092)
        Amount in Notice: $38,031
        Status: The Trustee and the Debtors are investigating the
claim asserted by the IRS.

     h. Interested Parties: Eduardo F. Magalhaes, Arturo Sarli
and/or EFM Realty, LLC
        Nature of Interest: Letter of Intent to Enter Contract
dated Nov. 7, 2016
        Status: The Trustee and the Debtors dispute the
enforceability of the letter of intent.

     i. Lessees of the WPIP Properties identified on WPIP's
Schedule G.

To be clear, the Debtors ask to sell the WPIP Properties free and
clear and all liens, claims, encumbrances and other interests,
including all of the interests listed in the preceding paragraph
and in Schedule G.

Excavating owns and wants to sell these properties in Baltimore
City, Maryland: (i) SS W Patapsco Avenue & River, Lot 4A, 0.139
acres, TAX ID Number 25-05-7612N-004A; and (ii) SS W Patapsco
Avenue & River, Lot 6, 0.235 acres, Tax ID Number 25-05-7612N-006.

Upon information and belief, these entities have Encumbrances, or
have asserted Encumbrances, on the Excavating Properties:

     a. Secured Party: Canary Island Development Co., Inc.
        Collateral: all Excavating Properties
        Description: Mortgage recorded April 26, 1989 (Book 2074,
Page 414)
        Amount in Deed of Trust: $925,000
        Status: The Trustee and the Debtors are investigating the
claim of Canary Island Development Co., Inc.

     b. Secured Party: United States of America
        Collateral: all Excavating Properties
        Description: Notice of Federal Tax Lien issued Dec.27, 2007
(Case Number 24-L-07-008603)
        Amount in Notice: $1,026,440
        Status: The Trustee and the Debtors are investigating the
claim of the IRS.

     c. Secured Party: B.P.I. Patapsco, LLC
        Collateral: all Excavating Properties
        Description: Deed of Trust recorded Feb. 13, 2013 (Book
14961, Page 134)
        Amount in Deed of Trust: $200,000
        Status: The Trustee and the Debtors are investigating the
claim asserted by BPI Patapsco.

Silverlake owns and wants seeks to sell this property in Baltimore
City, Maryland: 2911 Huron Street, 2.926 acres, Tax ID Number
25-04-7492B-026.

Upon information and belief, this entity has an Encumbrance, or has
asserted an Encumbrance, on the Silverlake Property:

     a. Secured Party: C&G Properties, LLC
        Collateral: 2911 Huron Street
        Description: Money Loaned Mortgage recorded May 5, 2010
(Book 12604, Page 341)
        Amount in Deed of Trust: $40,000
        Status: The Trustee and the Debtors do not dispute the debt
of C&G Properties, LLC.

The Trustee and the Debtors, in consultation with A&G Realty
Partners, LLCG, concluded that selling the Properties will generate
the highest and best value with respect to such assets and thus be
in the best interest of the Debtors' creditors and estates.

The Debtors will sell the Properties on an "as is, where is" basis
and without warranties or representations of any kind; and free and
clear of all Encumbrances with all such Encumbrances attaching to
the net proceeds of the sales.

The Trustee, WPIP and Excavating entered into a Purchase and Sale
Agreement with Copart of Connecticut, Inc. to sell the WPIP
Properties and the Excavating Properties for an aggregate purchase
price of $4,526,801, subject to higher and better offers, as set
forth in the Purchase and Sale Agreement.

As set forth in the Copart Agreement, the parties propose to
allocate the purchase price as follows: $4,476,166 on account of
the WPIP Properties and $50,635 on account of the Excavating
Properties.  The proposed allocation is based on a proportional
allotment of the proposed purchase price based on acreage.

Silverlake has agreed to enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement
with Crown Joseph Corp. to sell the Silverlake Property for $12,000
as set forth in the Purchase and Sale Agreement.

The Debtors ask that the proceeds generated from the sale of the
WPIP Properties be subject to a carve-out in favor of WPIP's
bankruptcy estate and A&G in an amount equal to 15% of the gross
sale price.  JACE Note, LLC asserts a first-priority secured claim
with respect to the WPIP Properties.  On May 21, 2018, the Trustee
filed an objection to JACE Note's claim in the Suddreth Case.  JACE
Note has not yet filed a proof of claim with respect to WPIP.  JACE
Note claims to be owed as much as $2.9 million.  The proposed
purchase price for the WPIP Properties exceeds the amount asserted
by JACE Note.  

If JACE Note's claim is not adjudicated prior to closing on the
sale of the WPIP Properties, the Debtors propose to escrow such
amount of the proceeds as may be necessary to pay JACE Note's
secured claim in full, with further disposition of such funds held
pending further order of the Court.  If JACE Note's claim is
adjudicated prior to closing, the Debtors will distribute the sale
proceeds pursuant to the lien priorities and amounts determined by
the Court.

Based on the Trustee's investigation, CFS-4 II, LLC holds the
second-priority secured claim with respect to the WPIP Properties.
CFS has consented to the Debtors' proposed sale of the WPIP
Properties and agreed to an allocation of the balance of the sale
proceeds (after the distribution described in the preceding
paragraph for JACE Note) as follows: (a) a carve-out for WPIP's
bankruptcy estate and A&G in the amount of 15% of the gross
purchase price and (b) the balance to CFS up to the amount of its
allowed secured claim.

Based on the Trustee's investigation, Suddreth held the
third-priority and fourth-priority liens on the WPIP Properties due
to subordination agreements executed in favor of JACE Note and CFS'
predecessor-in-interest, Baltimore County Savings Bank.  Suddreth
waived his claims against WPIP.

The Trustee and the Debtors dispute the claims and liens asserted
by BPI Patapsco and Einstein, who according to the Trustee's title
search hold the fifth-priority and sixth-priority liens on the WPIP
Properties.  The Trustee has been unable to confirm that any
advances were made by BPI Patapsco and/or Einstein to WPIP or that
there is a valid debt due and owing by Excavating to BPI Patapsco
and/or Einstein.  The Trustee and the Debtors therefore dispute
that any amounts are owed to either of BPI Patapsco or Einstein and
consequently dispute their respective liens.

Based on the Trustee's investigation, the Internal Revenue Service
holds the seventh-priority secured claim with respect to the WPIP
Properties.  The IRS consents to the proposed sale of the WPIP
Properties so long as the liens attach to the sale proceeds to the
same extent and priority as existed immediately prior to the sale.

From the proceeds of sale of the WPIP Properties, the Debtors will:
(a) pay all real estate taxes and assessments, and all
post-petition water or sewer charges, gas, electric, telephone,
other utilities and other similar obligations owed by the Debtors
in connection with the WPIP Properties up to but not including the
date of closing; (b) carve-out for the WPIP bankruptcy estate and
A&G an amount equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the gross sale
price; (c) hold in escrow an amount sufficient to pay JACE Note's
secured claim in full to the extent it is allowed pending further
order of the Court; and (d) pay the balance of the sale proceeds to
CFS.

The Debtors ask that the proceeds generated from the sale of the
Excavating Properties be subject to a carve-out in the amount of
20% of the gross sale price for the benefit of Excavating's
bankruptcy estate plus an additional 3% of the gross sale price for
the benefit of A&G.

According to the Trustee’s title search, Canary Island
Development Co., Inc. holds the first-priority secured claim with
respect to the Excavating Properties.  Upon information and belief,
Elmer MacLeod was the sole owner of Canary Island and passed away
in January 2002. The Debtors are providing notice of the Motion to
MacLeod's probate estate.  The Trustee and the Debtors have been
unable to confirm whether the lien and/or debt to Canary Island are
valid and enforceable.  Therefore, for purposes of the Motion, the
Trustee and the Debtors dispute the Canary Island lien and debt.  

Based on the Trustee's investigation, the IRS holds the
second-priority secured claim with respect to the Excavating
Properties.  The IRS consents to the proposed sale of the
Excavating Properties so long as the liens attach to the sale
proceeds to the same extent and priority as existed immediately
prior to the sale.

According to the Trustee's title search for the Excavating
Properties, BPI Patapsco holds the third-priority lien on the
Excavating Properties.  The Trustee has been unable to confirm that
any advances were made by BPI Patapsco to Excavating or that there
is a valid debt due and owing by Excavating to BPI Patapsco.  The
Trustee and the Debtors therefore dispute that any amounts are owed
to BPI Patapsco and consequently dispute its lien.

From the proceeds of sale of the Excavating Properties, the Debtors
will: (a) pay all real estate taxes and assessments, and all
post-petition water or sewer charges, gas, electric, telephone,
other utilities and other similar obligations owed by the Debtors
in connection with the Excavating Properties up to but not
including the date of closing; (b) carve-out for the Excavating
bankruptcy estate an amount equal to 20% of the gross sale price;
(c) pay the fixed fee of A&G in an amount equal to 3% of the gross
sale price; and (d) hold the remaining sale proceeds in escrow
pending further order of the Court.

The Debtors request that the proceeds generated from the sale of
the Silverlake Property be subject to a carve-out in the amount of
20% of the gross sale price for the benefit of Silverlake's
bankruptcy estate plus an additional 3% of the gross sale price for
the benefit of A&G.

Based on the Trustee's investigation, only C&G Properties, LLC has
a lien on the Silverlake Property.  C&G has consented to the
Debtors' proposed sale of the Silverlake Property and agreed to an
allocation of the balance of the sale proceeds as follows: (a)
Reimbursement of real estate taxes advanced by the Suddreth
bankruptcy estate in April 2018 in the estimated amount of $2,000;
(b) a 20% carve-out for the Silverlake bankruptcy estate in the
estimated amount of $2,400; (c) a 3% carve-out for A&G in the
estimated amount of $360; and (d) The balance to C&G (estimated
$7,240).  C&G agreed to waive any and all claims against Suddreth
and Silverlake remaining after distribution of the sale proceeds as
set forth.

From the proceeds of sale of the Silverlake Property, the Debtors
will: (a) pay all real estate taxes and assessments, and all
post-petition water or sewer charges, gas, electric, telephone,
other utilities and other similar obligations owed by the Debtors
in connection with the Silverlake Property up to but not including
the date of closing; (b) reimburse the Suddreth bankruptcy estate
for the real estate taxes it paid in April 2018 (approximately
$2,000); (c) carveout for the Silverlake bankruptcy estate an
amount equal to 20% of the gross sale price; (d) pay the fixed fee
of A&G in an amount equal to 3% of the gross  sale price; and (e)
pay the balance of the sale proceeds to C&G.

Pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 6004-1(b), the Debtors highlight
these provisions and material terms related to the proposed sales:

     a. Sale to Insider: The Debtors ask to sell the Properties to
the parties submitting the highest and best offers after a robust
marketing process.

     b. Private Sale/No Competitive Bidding: The proposed sales are
the result of a robust and open marketing process, and the Debtors
ask approval of the proposed sales subject to higher or better
offers.

     c. Closing and Other Deadlines: The Debtors intend to close on
the sale of the Silverlake Property to Crown Joseph as soon as
practicable after entry of the applicable Sale Order.  The Copart
Agreement provides that closing will occur on the later of 30 days
after the expiration of the Feasibility Study Period (as defined in
the Copart Agreement), as the same may be extended, or 30 days
immediately following the Court's entry of the applicable Sale
Order or such other date to which the parties may mutually agree in
writing, but in any event no later than 120 days after execution by
all parties of the Copart Agreement.

     d. Good Faith Deposit: The Copart Agreement provides for
payment of an earnest money deposit in the amount 10% of the
purchase price, i.e., $452,680.

     e. Interim Arrangements with Proposed Buyer: The Copart
Agreement provides that, in the event the Debtors receive any
additional offers for the WPIP Properties and the Excavating
Properties, Copart will be named the "stalking horse" with respect
to such Properties and the Debtors shall, without further Court
notice, action or order, return Copart's earnest money deposit
(less any Extension Fees paid pursuant to Section 5.2 of the Copart
Agreement) to Copart upon closing of a sale of such Properties to a
party other than Copart.  The Copart Agreement also provides that,
if the Debtors sell the WPIP Properties and the Excavating
Properties to a buyer other than Copart, the Debtors will reimburse
Copart's reasonable documented costs and expenses in an amount not
greater than $95,000 incurred in connection with the Copart
Agreement and the transaction contemplated therein.  The proposed
sale of the Silverlake  Property does not include a "stalking
horse" or initial buyer and therefor

     f. Credit Bid: The Debtors do not seek to impair, restrict or
limit the rights of holders of secured claims to credit bid the
full amount of their respective claims consistent with and pursuant
to section 363(k) of the Bankruptcy Code.

     g. Relief from Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h): The Debtors ask relief
from the 14-day stay imposed by Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) and request
that the Sale Orders be immediately enforceable.

A copy of the APAs attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Manus_Suddreth_563_Sales.pdf

The Purchasers:

          COPART OF CONNECTICUT, INC.
          14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 300
          Dallas, TX 75254
          Attention: Randy A. Racine
          Telephone: (972) 391-5050
          E-mail: randy.racine@copart.com

                     -- and --

          CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO., Escrow Agent
          2000 M Street NW, Ste. 610
          Washington, MD 20036
          Attention: Erik Davis
          Telephone: (202) 263-4738
          E-mail: erik.davis@ctt.com

          Bolaji Tubi, General Manager
          CROWN JOSEPH CORP.
          2421 Arbuton Avenue, #E
          Baltimore, MD 21230
          Telephone: (240) 330-2680
          E-mail: adejump@gmail.com

                  About Manus Edward Suddreth

Manus Edward Suddreth, the sole shareholder of W.P.I.P., Inc.,
filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Md. Case No.
13-12978) on Feb. 21, 2013.

On Dec. 28, 2016, the Court appointed Joseph J. Bellinger, Jr., as
Chapter 11 Trustee.  On July 21, 2017, the Court appointed Charles
R. Goldstein as Chapter 11 Trustee.

On Nov. 6, 2017, the Court entered an order authorizing the
Trustee's retention of A&G Realty Partners, LLC, as real estate
consultant and advisor.

On July 21, 2017, the Court appointed Charles R. Goldstein as the
Chapter 11 Trustee.


MARQUIS DIAGNOSTIC: Physician Group Buying All Assets for $6M
-------------------------------------------------------------
Marquis Diagnostic Imaging of Arizona, LLC, Radiant Medical
Imaging, LLC, DVR Acquisition, LLC, and Desert Valley Radiology,
P.L.C., ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
Georgia to authorize their bidding procedures in connection with
the sale of substantially all their assets to Physician Group of
Arizona, Inc. for $6 million, subject to overbid.

After evaluating alternatives and consulting with their advisors
and directors, the Debtors concluded that it was in the best
interests of the Debtors, their creditors, their employees and
other parties in interest to effectuate a sale of the Operating
Assets.  Such a going concern sale will enable the Purchaser to
provide vital services to the communities surrounding the centers
of the Sellers, while also preserving jobs and supporting the local
economy.

The Debtors solicited offers for the assets of the Sellers and
received offers from multiple parties.  The highest purchase price
received by the Sellers was offered in a proposal from the
Physician Group to purchase the Identified Assets.

The terms proposed by Physician Group are summarized in the LOI,
and will be memorialized in a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement
currently being negotiated by the Debtors and Physician Group.  The
Debtors and Physician Group contemplate a sale that is free and
clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances.

The $6 million purchase price will include a deposit of $100,000 to
be paid upon execution of a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement and
held by the Sellers pending final approval of the Court and closing
of the transaction plus an additional amount in cash for the fair
value of Sellers's non-expired supplies, inventory and prepaid
assets, subject to adjustment.  In addition, the Purchaser will be
responsible for the first $250,000 of cure claims associated with
Assumed Liabilities.

To assist the Debtors in addressing financial constraints, the LOI
provides that the Physician Group may provide up to $250,000 in DIP
financing for the purpose of paying administrative obligations in
the Cases, subject to a grant of sufficient senior security,
consent of existing senior lien holders, approval of the Court,
Physician Group receiving a credit against the purchase price paid
by the Physician Group and the other terms and conditions set forth
in the LOI, including entry of an order by the Court approving the
DIP financing, and granting the other rights, claims and
protections contemplated by the LOI.

The Sellers are negotiating the terms and conditions of the
definitive Agreement with Physician Group that will develop the LOI
into a definite and binding agreement.  Because of the financial
condition of the Sellers, the LOI requires that approval from the
Court be obtained expeditiously so that Physician Group, if it is
approved as the Purchaser, can close on the proposed sale no later
than Aug. 30, 2018.  The Debtors believe that any other potential
Purchaser will wish to close within that same time frame.  

Accordingly, because of the importance of being able to obtain
Court approval for a sale to allow a closing by the end of August,
the Debtors are filing the Motion prior to completing documentation
of an Agreement with Physician Group.  As soon as practicable after
the Sellers finalize the Agreement with Physician Group, the
Debtors will file it with the Court.

Any proposed Agreement will provide for the sale and assignment to
a Purchaser of certain Identified Assets, for a purchase price and
on terms and conditions as set forth more fully in the Agreement.
The sale of Identified Assets is to be free and clear of any and
all liens, claims, interests and encumbrances, with these to attach
to the net proceeds generated from the sale of the Identified
Assets, to the extent valid, perfected and enforceable.

The Debtors anticipate that any proposed Agreement will provide for
the Debtors to assume many, but not all, of their Executory
Contracts, (subject to certain required amendments and
modifications) and assign them to a Purchaser, as more fully set
forth in the Agreement, and all subject to the Purchaser's ongoing
review and diligence as to the specific Executory Contracts for
which assignment will be requested.  At this time, the Debtors
request authority to assume and assign all of their Executory
Contracts to the Purchaser, including, without limitation, those
leases, contracts, licenses and other agreements to be identified
in a supplement to be filed on or prior the hearing on this Motion
on June 21, 2018.

The Debtors, by the Motion, are also requesting that any objections
by parties to the Assigned Contracts to assumption and assignment
(and corresponding Cure Costs) should be filed by 5:00 p.m. (ET),
two days prior to the Sale Hearing, and determined at the Sale
Hearing.  The Purchaser will assume all obligations that arise
after the closing date under each Assigned Contract for which the
Purchaser accepts on assignment.

Subject to the terms of the Agreement reached with Physician Group,
if a closing occurs with respect to a sale of Identified Assets to
a party other than Physician Group with respect to such assets, the
Debtors propose that Physician Group (a) be paid an agreed-upon
Breakup Fee in an amount equal to 3% of the actual purchase price
paid to the Sellers for the Identified Assets, and (b) be
reimbursed for its reasonable and documented out-of-pocket costs
and expenses incurred in connection with, or related to (directly
or indirectly), the transactions contemplated by the Agreement, in
an amount not to exceed $100,000.

In order to ensure that asset values are truly maximized, the
Debtors ask that the Court approves the bid procedures at the
Procedures Hearing.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Overbid Deadline: 5:00 p.m. local time in Atlanta, Georgia
on (TBD).

     b. Deposit: $100,000

     c. Auction: The Debtors will conduct an Auction with respect
to the sale of the Identified Assets on (TBD) beginning at 10:00
a.m. local time, at the offices of counsel for the Debtors, Law
Offices of Henry F. Sewell Jr., LLC, Buckhead Centre, 2964
Peachtree Road NW, Suite 555, Atlanta, GA 30305 (Attn: Henry F.
Sewell, Jr., Esq.).

     d. Bid Increments: $100,000

     e. DIP Financing: In the event that, at the conclusion of the
Auction, the Debtors determine the Prevailing Bid was submitted by
a Qualified Bidder other than Physician Group, then such Qualified
Bidder shall, as a condition precedent to being designated as the
Prevailing Bid, and not later than one business day following the
conclusion of the Sale Hearing, (i) pay to Physician Group cash in
an amount equal to the sum of all amounts due and owing by the
Debtors under the DIP Facility provided by Physician Group
(including, without limitation, principal, accrued interest, fees
and unreimbursed expenses); and (ii) be deemed to have replaced and
superseded Physician Group as the "lender" under the DIP Facility,
and Physician Group will have no obligation or responsibility to
advance additional funds to the Debtors.

     f. Sale Heging: TBD

A copy of the LOI and the Bidding Procedures attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Marquis_Diagnostic_125_Sales.pdf

A hearing on the Motion is set for June 21, 2018.

The Debtors ask the Court to authorize them to assume and assign
multiple executory contracts and unexpired leases to the
Purchaser.

Because of the need to close the transactions contemplated as
promptly as possible, the Debtors ask that the Court orders and
directs that the order approving the Motion will not be
automatically stayed for 14 days.

                About Marquis Diagnostic Imaging

Marquis Diagnostic Imaging, LLC, is an outpatient diagnostic
imaging center that provides a comprehensive exam for patients
experiencing serious heart conditions, stroke and other
life-threatening diseases. Marquis offers MRI (Magnetic Resonance
Imaging), CT (Computed Tomography), Ultrasound, and X-ray services.
The Company maintains its facilities in Gilbert and Phoenix,
Arizona.

Marquis Diagnostic Imaging, LLC and its affiliates Marquis
Diagnostic Imaging of North Carolina, LLC and Marquis Diagnostic
Imaging of Arizona, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D.
Ga. Case Nos. 18-52365, 18-52367 and 18-52380, respectively) on
Feb. 9, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Venesky, authorized representative, MD
Imaging, LLC, estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and up
to $50,000 in debt; MD Imaging of NC estimated up to $50,000 in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities; and MD Imaging
of Arizona estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and debt.

Henry F. Sewell, Jr., Esq., of the Law Offices of Henry F. Sewell,
Jr., serves as counsel to the Debtors.

No trustee, examiner or official committee of unsecured creditors
has been appointed in any of the Debtors' cases.


MEHRI AKHLAGHPOUR: Bid to Stay Sale of Real Properties Junked
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Victoria S. Kaufman entered an order denying
Debtor Mehri Akhlaghpour's application for a stay of orders
approving sale of real properties located California.

On April 12, 2018, the Trustee filed a motion to sell the real
property located at 17315 Cagney Street, Granada Hills, California
91344. On the same day, the Trustee filed a motion to sell [doc.
178] the real property located at 16320 Gledhill Street, North
Hills, California 91343.

Debtor opposed both motions, arguing that the Trustee sought to
sell substantially all of the estate's assets, that the Cagney
Property and the Gledhill Property should be sold through a chapter
11 plan, that the sales constituted an improper sub rosaplan and
that a sale under 11 U.S.C. section 363(b) violated Debtor's due
process rights. In both oppositions, Debtor stressed that the Court
should deny the motions in favor of allowing Debtor to file a
chapter 11 plan of reorganization.  

On May 15, 2018, the Court entered two orders approving the sales
of the Cagney Property and the Gledhill Property.

Debtor filed a motion to stay the enforcement of the Sale Orders.
In the Motion for Stay, Debtor requests relief under Federal Rule
of Bankruptcy Procedure  8007, on the basis that a stay of the Sale
Orders is required to ensure that Debtor is able to file a plan of
reorganization. In the Opposition, the Trustee notes that the sale
of the Gledhill Property closed prior to or at the same time as the
filing of the Motion for Reconsideration and the Motion for Stay,
rendering both motions moot as concerns the Gledhill Property. With
respect to the Cagney Property, the Trustee asserts that Debtor has
not met her burden of demonstrating that a stay of the Sale Orders
is warranted in this case.

The Court finds that the Motion for Stay appears to be moot as
concerns the Gledhill Property because, according to the Trustee,
the sale of the Gledhill Property has already closed. Even if the
Motion for Stay is not moot as to the Gledhill Property, the Court
finds that Debtor has not demonstrated that a stay of either of the
Sale Orders is warranted in this case.

The bankruptcy case is in re: Mehri Akhlaghpour, Chapter 11,
Debtor, Case No. 1:17-bk-12739-VK (Bankr. C.D. Cal.).

Mehri Akhlaghpour, Debtor, represented by Giovanni Orantes, Orantes
Law Firm PC &Luis A. Solorzano, The Orantes Law Firm, P.C.

Nancy J Zamora, Trustee, represented by Jeffrey S. Kwong, Levene
Neale Bender Yoo & Brill LLP & Edward M. Wolkowitz, Levene Neale
Bender Rankin & Brill LLP.

United States Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Russell
Clementson.

               About Mehri Akhlaghpour

Mehri Akhlaghpour filed a Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal.
Case No. 17-12739) on Oct. 11, 2017, and was represented by
Giovanni Orantes, Esq.

The Debtor asserts an interest in six real properties:

   * A single family residence located at 4450 Winnetka Ave.,
Woodland Hills, CA 91364;

   * A condominium located at 26943 Hillsborough Parkway, #27,
Valencia, CA 91354;  

   * A condominium located at 5454 Zelzah Avenue, #302, Encino, CA
91316;

   * A single family residence located at 16320 Gledhill Street,
North Hills, CA 91343;

   * A single family residence located at 17315 Cagney Street,
Granada Hills, CA 91344; and

   * A condominium located at 8338 Woodley Pl. #28, North Hills, CA
91343.

On Dec. 29, 2017, the Office of the United States Trustee filed a
motion to appoint a Chapter 11 Trustee.  The Motion was granted.

On Jan. 25, 2018, Nancy J. Zamora was appointed as the Debtor's
Chapter 11 Trustee.  The Trustee tapped Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo
& Brill L.L.P. as counsel; and Rodeo Realty, Inc., as real estate
broker.


MESABI METALLICS: Court Upholds Ruling in Cliff's Land Dispute
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. on July 23, 2018, disclosed that the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware reaffirmed the
2017 Cliffs acquisition of land located in Nashwauk, MN.  The
ruling resolved the land dispute in favor of Cliffs and Glacier
Park Iron Ore Properties LLC ("GPIOP").  With that, Cliffs expects
to be able to utilize the acquired real estate interests to
implement a financially sustainable plan for the site.

In his ruling, Judge Brendan Shannon also determined that Mesabi
Metallics LLC's ("Mesabi Metallics") lease rights terminated on
October 31, 2017 when it failed to exit bankruptcy by such date.
The properties acquired by Cliffs include parcels that were
previously leased by GPIOP to Mesabi Metallics, formerly known as
Essar Steel Minnesota.

The land interests include a combination of undivided and whole fee
interests as well as mineral and surface leases, all lying within
the Biwabik Iron Formation.  The acreage acquired is approximately
553 acres and the acreage being leased is approximately 3,215
acres.

                     About Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.

Founded in 1847, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE: CLF) --
http://www.clevelandcliffs.com-- is the largest and oldest
independent iron ore mining company in the United States.  It is a
major supplier of iron ore pellets to the North American steel
industry from our mines and pellet plants located in Michigan and
Minnesota.  By 2020, Cliffs expects to be the sole producer of hot
briquetted iron (HBI) in the Great Lakes region with the
development of its first production plant in Toledo, Ohio.

                    About Essar Steel Minnesota

Essar Steel Minnesota LLC, now known as Mesabi Metallics Company
LLC, and ESML Holdings Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 16-11627 and 16-11626) on July
8, 2016.  Madhu Vuppuluri, president and CEO, signed the
petitions.

ESML Holdings Inc. estimated assets at $1 billion to $10 billion
and debt at $500 million to $1 billion.  Essar Steel Minnesota LLC
estimated assets and debt at $1 billion to $10 billion.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon is the case judge.

Craig H. Averich, Esq., at White & Case LLP and John L. Bird, Esq.,
and Jeffrey M. Schlerf, Esq., at Fox Rothschild LLP, serve as
counsel to the Debtors.  Epic Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC, serves as
claims and noticing agent.

Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, on July 20, 2016,
appointed the official committee of unsecured creditors of ESML
Holdings, Inc., and its affiliates.  The Committee retained Andrew
K. Glenn, at Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman LLP, to act as
counsel.  Garvan F. McDaniel, at Hogan McDaniel, act as Delaware
counsel.  David MacGreevey, at Zolfo Cooper, LLC, is the
Committee's financial advisor.


METCOM NETWORK: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
----------------------------------------------------
Metcom Network Services, Inc., filed a disclosure statement for its
proposed chapter 11 plan of liquidation dated July 2, 2018.

The Plan provides for the distribution of the proceeds of the
liquidation of the Debtor to all creditors with Allowed Claims and
Stock Interest Holders with Allowed Stock Interests. The Plan also
provides for the classification and treatment of all Claims against
the Debtor and Stock Interests in the Debtor. Allowed Priority
Claims will be paid in full, Allowed Secured Claims will be
unimpaired, and holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims against
the Liquidating Debtor, will receive cash in an amount equal to
100% of the Allowed amount of their Claims.

The monies to fund the Plan are derived from the sums remaining,
after disbursements (a) from the net proceeds of the sale, which
occurred on or around Jan. 31, 2017, of substantially all of the
Debtor’s assets, and the assignment of leases and executory
contracts, to the purchaser, Epsilon US, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement, (b) Security
Deposit Refunds from landlords and other entities, and (c) monies
remaining in the Debtor's Debtor in Possession account, which are
now in the possession of Ackerman Fox, LLP, the Debtor's counsel,
which will serve as the Disbursing Agent of the monies to be
distributed under the Plan.

Since the Debtor's assets have all been liquidated and the funds
from same are being held in escrow by Debtor's counsel, there is
little question about the feasibility of the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb16-11870-165.pdf

             About Metcom Network Services

Metcom Network Services, Inc., is a New York corporation, with its
principal place of business at 60 Hudson Street, New York, New
York, Suites 1001 and 2303.  Metcom is owned 50% by Mark DuMoulin,
Sr., and 50% by Susan Becker DuMoulin.  Metcom is in the business
of telecommunications, building and local interconnection and
engineering support, including the colocation of customer
equipment.

Metcom sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-11870) on June 28, 2016.  The petition
was signed by Mark DuMoulin, Sr., president.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtor estimated its assets and liabilities at $1
million to $10 million.

Neil H. Ackerman, Esq., at Ackerman Fox, LLP, is the Debtor's
counsel.  ACT Financial & Tax Services, LLC, has been tapped as
accountant.

No trustee, examiner or committee of creditors has been appointed
in the Debtor's case.


METROPOLITAN DIAGNOSTIC: 8th Interim Cash Collateral Order Entered
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Timothy A. Barnes of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois has entered an eighth interim order
authorizing Metropolitan Diagnostic Imaging, Inc., to use cash
collateral up to and including Aug. 2, 2018.

The Debtor's Motion for Use of Cash Collateral is continued for
further hearing to Aug. 1, 2018 at 10:30 a.m.

The Debtor may use cash collateral to the extent of plus or minus
10% of each line item set forth on the Budget. The approved Budget
for the period ending July 31, 2018, provides total operating
expenses of $69,363.

The Bancorp Bank is granted and will have replacement liens in and
to the collateral which will have the validity, perfection and
enforceability as the prepetition liens held by Bancorp Bank.  In
addition, the Debtor will make an unallocated adequate protection
payment to Bancorp Bank in the amount of $10,000 on or before July
18, 2018.

A full-text copy of the Eighth Interim Order is available at

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb17-35285-130.pdf

                 About Metropolitan Diagnostic Imaging

Based in Chicago, Illinois, Advanced Medical Imaging Center, Inc.
-- https://www.amic-chicago.com/ -- has been providing radiological
services since 1985.  Its services include diagnostic breast MRI,
digital screening mammography, high field MRI/MRA, open MRI/MRA,
digital general x-ray, ultrasound, multi-detector CT/CTA, DEXA and
fluoroscopy/arthrography.

Metropolitan Diagnostic Imaging, d/b/a Advanced Medical Imaging,
Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bank. N.D. Ill. Case No.
17-35285) on Nov. 28, 2017.  In the petition signed by Moqueet
Syed, its president, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million
in both assets and liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge
Timothy A. Barnes.  The Debtor's legal counsel is Gregory K. Stern
P.C.


MILTON ZACHARSKI: Denial of J. Balsamo Claims vs J. Zorzit Upheld
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned JOSEPH J. BALSAMO, v. JOHN J. ZORZIT,
ET AL., No. 761 (Md. Spec. App.), the Court of Special Appeals of
Maryland affirmed the trial court's decision denying relief as to
Balsamo's breach of contract and negligence claims, denying
Balsamo's request for the judicial dissolution and winding-up of
Balsamo Norino Properties, LLC's business, and directing that an
independent accounting be undertaken for BNP's capital accounts.

The appeal arises out of a multi-faceted business dispute between
Joseph J. Balsamo and John J. Zorzit regarding Zorzit's management
of a company that they jointly owned, Balsamo Norino Properties,
LLC ("BNP"). In 2012, Balsamo filed a multi-count civil action in
the Circuit Court for Baltimore County asserting direct and
derivative claims against Zorzit, other entities owned by him, and
James Parks, CPA, an accountant who worked for BNP. Before trial,
the parties entered into a stipulation that reduced the number of
counts before the court to nine.

In his appeal, Balsamo argues that the trial court erred in denying
his request that were premised on the assertion that Zorzit
breached his fiduciary duties to BNP. He also contends that the
trial court abused its discretion in denying h request for judicial
dissolution and winding up of BNP. Finally, the trial court erred
in denying his request for exception to an accounting report.

The Court finds that pursuant to the powers Mr. Balsamo granted Mr.
Zorzit as managing member, Mr. Zorzit was authorized to enter into
the Norino Properties Agreement. As a real estate business, BNP
needed office space, utilities, office supplies, and personnel. As
managing member, Mr. Zorzit was entitled to enter into contracts
necessary for BNP to conduct its business. Indeed, Mr. Balsamo
acquiesced and accepted the benefits of the Norino Properties
Agreement for over a decade without objecting to it. Mr. Balsamo
does not dispute that Norino Properties provided services to BNP.
Norino Properties is entitled to compensation for those services.
There is no evidence that Mr. Zorzit nor Norino Properties
benefited at the expense of BNP as a result of the Norino
Properties Agreement. Rather, the evidence shows BNP received an
extensive benefit without being billed for the services it
received. As a result, the Norino Properties Agreement is
enforceable against BNP as it is supported by ample consideration
and not the product of self-dealing or breach of Mr. Zorzit's
fiduciary duties. Accordingly, the relief sought by Plaintiff is
denied.

The Court also holds that BNP should not be dissolved because it is
reasonably practicable to carry on the business in conformity with
the articles of organization.  Accordingly, the relief sought by
Mr. Balsamo in Count Two of his Fourth Amended Complaint is
denied.

On the last issue, though there have been attempts to settle the
capital accounts, the Court accepts Mr. Balsamo's evidence that
there are still discrepancies. Accordingly, the Court will order
the parties to choose an independent accountant within 60 days of
this order. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will appoint an
independent accountant. The independent accountant will determine
the proper accounting for member capital accounts and submit a
report to the Court detailing necessary adjustments, if any.

A full-text copy of the Court's July 9, 2018 Ruling is available at
https://bit.ly/2A03YE5 from Leagle.com.


MOHAJER12 CORP: Taps Friedman Poole as Attorneys
------------------------------------------------
Mohajer12 Corp seeks authority from the Bankruptcy Court to employ
Friedman, Poole & Friedman, PC, as its attorneys in its Chapter 11
case.

The Debtor expects the Firm to:

  (1) take appropriate action with respect to secured and priority

      creditors,

  (2) take appropriate action with respect to possible voidable   

      preferences and transfers,

  (3) prepare on behalf of the Debtor's necessary petitions,
      answers, order, reports and other papers and to try before
      the court whatever issues are deemed necessary,

  (4) investigate the accounts of the Debtor and the related
      financial transactions, and

  (5) perform all other legal services of the Debtor which may be
      deemed necessary.

The Firm assures the Court that it doesn't represent any interests
adverse to that of the Debtors.

                        About Mohajer12 Corp.

Mohajer12 Corp. filed for bankruptcy (Bankr. S.D. Ala. Case No.
18-02674) on July 3, 2018.  Barry A. Friedman, Esq. of Friedman,
Poole & Friedman, P.C., serves as the Debtor's counsel.


MONIKA AREFI: California Court Dismisses Suit vs JP Morgan, et al.
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Court of Appeals of California affirmed the trial court's order
dismissing the case captioned MONIKA AREFI et al., Plaintiffs and
Appellants, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al., Defendants and
Respondents, No. B263947 (Cal. App.).

Monika Arefi obtained two loans, both secured by the home she and
her husband, Abolhossan Arefi, shared in Beverly Hills. JP Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A., acquired the loans in 2008, and the Arefis soon
defaulted on both. Chase later sold the Arefis' second loan to
Miracle Day Investments, LLC, which subsequently foreclosed on the
property in late 2013 under the deed of trust securing the second
loan, which was actually a home equity line of credit.

In early 2014 the Arefis filed this action, their fifth against
Chase, Miracle Day, or both. They alleged, among other things,
Chase violated its duty under the recently-enacted California
Homeowner Bill of Rights (HBOR) to review the Arefis' application
for a loan modification in good faith. The Arefis also alleged
Miracle Day's foreclosure sale under the deed of trust securing the
second loan was improper and violated HBOR because the Arefis had a
pending application with Chase to modify the first loan.

The Arefis appeal from the trial court's order dismissing their
action after the court sustained demurrers by Chase and Miracle Day
to the Arefis' second amended complaint without leave to amend. The
Arefis also appeal the trial court's order granting Miracle Day's
motion for attorneys' fees.

When the Legislature enacted HBOR in 2012 and amended section
2923.6 to add the dual tracking provisions in subdivisions (c)
through (h), the Legislature left the language of subdivisions (a)
and (b) largely unchanged. The Court assumes the Legislature was
aware of the courts' interpretation of subdivisions (a) and (b) as
non-substantive, and acquiesced to that construction when it
enacted HBOR and left that language untouched. Moreover, while
subdivision (a) of former section 2923.6 did discuss a loan
servicer's "duty," that provision explained the duty is to
"maximize net present value," not to act in good faith, and is a
duty "owed to all parties in a loan pool, or to all investors under
a pooling and servicing agreement," not to borrowers like the
Arefis. Therefore, the Arefis' reliance on subdivision (a) is
misplaced.

Because the Arefis did not submit an application for a loan
modification to Miracle Day, they could not claim Miracle Day
violated HBOR by failing to review an application in good faith.
Instead, the Arefis alleged Miracle Day violated HBOR by
foreclosing on the deed of trust securing the second loan while
Chase was reviewing their application to modify the terms of the
first loan. To state such a cause of action, the Arefis argue we
should interpret HBOR to prohibit any foreclosure sale while a loan
modification application is pending with any lender, even a sale by
a junior lienholder under a deed of trust securing a second loan.
The restrictions and protections of HBOR, however, are limited to
first, or senior, lien deeds of trust; they do not apply to second,
or junior, lien deeds of trust. Because Miracle Day foreclosed
under the deed of trust securing the Arefis' second loan, Miracle
Day was not subject to, and did not violate, HBOR.

The Arefis also that argue Chase fraudulently misrepresented that
it "would review [Ms. Arefi's] loan modification in good faith" and
that "all decisions on the loan modification would be based off of
the principles enumerated in the Homeowner Bill of Rights."
Specifically, the Arefis alleged they "reasonably believed that
Defendants would have negotiated with [the Arefis] in good faith"
and they "reasonably relied" on the "fraudulent misrepresentations
made by Defendants." The Arefis, however, did not allege they took
any actions, or failed to take any actions, in reliance on Chase's
alleged misrepresentations. The two alleged misrepresentations
Chase made related to the Arefis' attempt to modify their first
loan with Chase; they do not concern Miracle Day's foreclosure
under the deed of trust securing the second loan. The Arefis did
not allege they took, or failed to take, any action relating to
their long-standing default on the second loan in reliance on
Chase's promise to review the first loan for a modification in good
faith. And, even if the Arefis could make such an allegation, such
inaction would not have been justifiable given the undisputed fact
that Miracle Day had already recorded a notice of default under the
deed of trust securing the second loan (identifying Miracle Day as
the current beneficiary) at the time the Arefis submitted to Chase
the application to modify the first loan. In other words, with an
uncured notice of default by Miracle Day under the second loan
still outstanding, the Arefis applied to Chase for a modification
of the first loan. The Arefis make no attempt to explain how
Chase's representations regarding the first loan modification
reasonably led them to take, or not take, any actions regarding
their default on the second loan and the resulting foreclosure.
There is no causal relationship between Chase's alleged
misrepresentations and Miracle Day's foreclosure.

Thus, the order dismissing the Arefis' action is affirmed. The
order awarding Miracle Day its attorneys' fees is affirmed. Chase
and Miracle Day are to recover their costs from the Arefis.

A full-text copy of the Court’s Ruling dated July 2, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2LnP9jl from Leagle.com.

Klapach & Klapach and Joseph S. Klapach -- Joseph@KlapachLaw.com --
for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner; Bryan Cave LLP, Bryan Cave, Glenn J.
Plattner -- glenn.plattner@bclplaw.com  -- and Richard P. Steelman,
Jr. --richard.steelman@bclplaw.com -- for Defendants and
Respondents JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Frandzel Robins Bloom & Csato, Andrew K. Alper, Hal D. Goldfam and
Chanel L. Oldham for Defendant and Respondent Miracle Day
Investments.

Monia Arefi filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 13-33301) on Sept. 19, 2013.


MUNN WORKS: Seeks Permission for Interim Use of Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------------------
Munn Works, LLC requests the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York for authority to use property which
may constitute collateral in which LG Funding LLC, Laurie Munn, and
On Deck may assert a security interest, substantially in accordance
with the terms and conditions set forth in the proposed Interim
Order.

The Debtor proposes to use collateral on an interim only for
ordinary and necessary limited operating expenses in connection
with the ordinary business operations of the Debtor's business and
assets substantially in accordance with the 30-day interim
operating Budget.

The Debtor believes that the interim use of collateral in
accordance with the Budget will provide it with adequate liquidity
to pay ordinary course payable administrative expenses as they
become due and payable during the period covered by the Budget
without any significant diminution in value of the collateral.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor was indebted to LG Funding in
the approximate outstanding principal amount of $28,000 under that
certain Purchase and Sale of Future Receivables Merchant Agreement.
The LG Agreement purports to assign all of the Debtor's future
accounts, contract rights and other obligations arising from or
relating to the payment of monies from the Debtor's customers'
and/or other third party payors for the payment of the Debtor's
sale of goods or services.

The Debtor is also indebted to Laurie Munn (the Debtor's sole
shareholder) in the approximate outstanding amount of $300,000
pursuant to a promissory note and security agreement. The Debtor's
obligations under the Munn Agreement are secured by a lien on
certain of the Debtor’s property including but not limited to all
cash, cash equivalents, accounts, contract rights, inventory,
furniture, equipment and all proceeds, products and profits
therefrom.
.
In addition, as of the Petition Date, On Deck alleged the Debtor
was indebted to it in the approximate outstanding amount of
$187,500.04, secured by a lien on certain of the Debtor's property
pursuant to that certain Business Loan and Security Agreement.

The Debtor believes that these Secured Creditors are the only
parties that may assert a security interest in its property which
may constitute, inter alia, Cash Collateral, subject to dispute and
further investigation by the Debtor and other parties in interest.

The Debtor will grant LG Funding, Laurie Munn, and On Deck
replacement liens in all of the Debtor's prepetition and
post-petition assets and proceeds, including the Collateral and the
proceeds of the foregoing, only to the extent that LG Funding,
Laurie Munn, and On Deck may have a valid security interest in said
pre-petition assets on the Petition Date and in the continuing
order of priority that existed as of the Petition Date.

The Replacement Liens will be subject and subordinate only to:

     (a) U.S. Trustee fees payable under 28 U.S.C. Section 1930 and
31 U.S.C Section 3717;

     (b) professional fees of duly retained professionals in this
Chapter 11 case as may be awarded pursuant to Sections 330 or 331
of the Code or pursuant to any monthly fee order entered in the
Debtor’s Chapter 11 case;

     (c) the fees and expenses of a hypothetical Chapter 7 trustee
to the extent of $10,000; and

     (d) the recovery of funds or proceeds from the successful
prosecution of avoidance actions.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb18-22972-6.pdf

                     About Munn Works, LLC

Based in Mount Vernon, New York, Munn Works, LLC --
https://www.munnworks.com/ -- manufactures fine mirrors and framed
artwork specifically for the hospitality industry. In addition to
its domestic partners, Munn Works maintains overseas production
capability with on-site MunnWorks employees.

Munn Works filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
18-22972) on June 25, 2018.  In the petition signed by Max Munn,
manager, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1 million
to $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Robert D. Drain.
Jonathan S. Pasternak, Esq., at Delbello Donnellan Weingarten Wise
& Wiederkehr, LLP, serves as counsel to the Debtor.  


NATIONAL MANAGEMENT: Taps Bederson LLP as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------
National Management and Preservation Services LLC seeks approval
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey to
hire Bederson LLP as its accountant.

The services to be provided by the firm include preparing monthly
operating reports; auditing the Debtor's 401(k) plan; filing and
amending payroll and corporate tax returns; and assisting the
Debtor's legal counsel in formulating a bankruptcy plan.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

     Partners                $390 to $515
     Managers                $305 to $325
     Senior Accountants          $265
     Semi Senior Accountants     $240
     Staff Accountants           $170
     Paraprofessionals           $170

Timothy King, a certified public accountant employed with Bederson,
disclosed in a court filing that he and his firm are
"disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

Bederson can be reached through:

     Timothy J. King
     Bederson LLP
     347 Mt. Pleasant Avenue
     West Orange, NJ 07052
     Tel: 973-530-9140
     Email: tking@bederson.com

                   About National Management and
                      Preservation Services

Based in Red Bank, New Jersey, National Management and Preservation
Services LLC -- http://www.nationalfieldnetwork.com/-- provides
management services on a contract or fee basis.

Petitioning creditors Garden State Property Services, Inc., The
Cole Team, Inc., and Eleuteria Sandra Hering filed a Chapter 7
petition against National Management (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No.
18-16859) on April 6, 2018.  The Chapter 7 case was converted to a
case under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on April 25, 2018.

The petitioning creditors are represented by David E. Shaver, Esq.,
at Broege, Neumann, Fischer & Shaver, in Manasquan, New Jersey.

The Debtor is represented by Brian L. Baker, Esq., and Chad Brian
Friedman, Esq., at Ravin Greenberg, LLC, in Newark, New Jersey.


NATIONAL ORTHOPEDICS: Unsecureds to Get $15K Quarterly Over 3 Years
-------------------------------------------------------------------
National Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, P.A., f/k/a Jeffrey L.
Kugler, M.D. P.A., submits a disclosure statement explaining its
proposed plan of reorganization.

Class 6 under the plan consists of the Allowed Claims of the
general unsecured creditors of the Debtor. The Debtor estimates the
aggregate amount of Class 6 general unsecured claims totals
approximately $22,500,000. If the Debtor's Plan is confirmed, each
holder of an Allowed general unsecured claim against the Debtor
will share in a total distribution of $180,000 pro rata. Payments
of $15,000 will be distributed pro rata on a quarterly basis over
three years, commencing on the first of the month after the
Effective Date, until the aggregate amount of $180,000 is paid. The
Debtor may prepay any or all of the distributions with no
prepayment penalty.

The Debtor believes that there is minimal risk to creditors as to
the completion of the Plan. The Plan will be funded primarily by
the Debtor's Cash on Hand, operating income and any additional Cash
held by the Debtor as of the date of the Confirmation Hearing.
Based on the foregoing, the Debtor asserts that it is able to
perform all of their obligations under the Plan.

The Debtor will continue to exist after the Effective Date with all
assets re-vesting in the Debtor. Following the Effective Date, the
Debtor shall be free to operate and perform any and all acts
authorized by their Operating Agreements without further order from
the Court, subject only to the terms of the Plan and Confirmation
Order. Upon the Effective Date, the Debtor's management will remain
unchanged.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb18-11757.pdf  

               About National Orthopedics

National Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, P.A., f/k/a Jeffrey L.
Kugler, M.D. P.A. -- http://nationalorthoandneuro.com/-- offers
treatment options for orthopedic injuries.  With locations in Lake
Worth and Royal Palm Beach, Florida, the Company is helping
patients from all over the Southeast.

National Orthopedics and Neurosurgery filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-11757) on Feb. 15, 2018, disclosing
$1.02 million assets and $1.86 million debt.  The petition was
signed by Jeffrey L. Kugler, director.  The case is assigned to
Judge Erik P. Kimball.  The Debtor is represented by Robert C.
Furr, Esq., at Furr & Cohen.


NEIGHBORS INVESTMENTS: Kansas Ct. to Handle Suit vs D. Baumgartner
------------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Douglas Harpool denied the plaintiff's motion to
remand the case captioned NEIGHBORS INVESTMENTS, INC., Plaintiff,
v. DAVID G. BAUMGARTNER, and THE BANK OF VERSAILLES, Defendants,
Case No. 2:18-cv-04047-MDH (W.D. Mo.) and granted the Defendant's
motion to transfer venue.

This case arises from a dispute concerning the alleged actions of
David Baumgartner and The Bank of Versailles arising from the
management of Gentle Slopes Partners, LLC (Gentle Slopes).
Neighbors Investments, Inc., and David Baumgartner were each 50%
members of Gentle Slopes. Neighbors Investments asserts direct and
derivative state law claims against Defendants.

The parties in this matter dispute the proper forum for this
action. Neighbors Investments, Inc., originally brought the action
in Missouri state court and asks this Court to remand the action to
the Missouri courts. Defendants, on the other hand, removed the
action to federal court and ask the Court to transfer the action to
the District of Kansas for referral to the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Kansas so that Neighbors Investments'
Chapter 11 bankruptcy case may be reopened.

The Court finds that the court familiar with the prior bankruptcy
case and the underlying facts which supported prior rulings is
better positioned to determine whether the claims asserted "arise
under" Title 11 or could merely "conceivably effect" the bankruptcy
estate. Thus, transferring the case strikes this Court as the most
prudent, efficient, and economical action. If the Bankruptcy Court
concludes that these are not core proceedings, the Bankruptcy Court
may remand any remaining claims directly to the state courts of
Missouri for further proceedings, or it may have the case
transferred back to this Court for remand, whichever it deems most
appropriate. At this time, this Court believes the matters are core
proceedings if all of the allegations made by Neighbors Investments
in its Complaint prove true.

Given the fact that the underlying bankruptcy case proceeded in the
District of Kansas, Neighbors Investments, its owners, and records
are all citizens of Kansas, and Defendants are prepared to litigate
this issue in Kansas, the Court is comfortable with a finding that
transfer is appropriate under Section 1412.

The Court, thus, orders that the matter be transferred to the
United States District Court for the District of Kansas for
referral to the United States Bankruptcy Court of the District of
Kansas.

A full-text copy of the Court's Order dated July 10, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2A1BpWJ from Leagle.com.

Neighbors Investments, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by John Justin
Johnston , Johnston Law Firm LLC.

David G. Baumgartner & The Bank of Versailles, Defendants,
represented by Todd W. Ruskamp -– truskapm@shb.com -- Shook,
Hardy & Bacon, LLP.

Based in Stilwell, Kansas, Neighbors Investments, Inc. filed for
chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 11-21022)
on April 13, 2011, with estimated assets of $500,001 to $1,000,000
and estimated liabilities of $1,000,001 to $10,000,000. The
petition was signed by Mark S. Neighbors, president.


NEW CITY HISTORIC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: New City Historic Auto Row, LLC
           dba Alfa Romeo of Chicago
        2401 S. Michigan Street
        Chicago, IL 60616

Business Description: New City Historic Auto Row, LLC --
                      https://www.alfaromeousaofchicago.com --
                      is a dealer of new and pre-owned Alfa Romeo
                      vehicles in Chicago, Illinois.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 25, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Illinois (Chicago)

Case No.: 18-20811

Judge: Hon. Jacqueline P. Cox

Debtor's Counsel: Michael C. Moody, Esq.
                  O'ROURKE & MOODY, LLP
                  55 West Wacker Drive, Suite 1400
                  Chicago, IL 60601
                  Tel: 312 849-2020
                  Fax: 312 849-2021
                  Email: mmoody@orourkeandmoody.com
                         firm@orourkeandmoody.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Michael Helmstetter, president and CEO.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb18-20811_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb18-20811.pdf


NICHOLS BROTHERS: Joe Verebelyi Leaves Creditors' Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------
Joe Verebelyi is no longer serving on the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of Nichols Brothers,
Inc. and its affiliates.

These creditors remaining on the Committee:

     (1) Alan Martin Alan Martin
         P.O. Box 1469
         McAlester, OK 74502
         Tel: (918) 470-9969
         E-mail: alan.martin@horizonpandc.com

     (2) Robert Lorance
         P.O. Box 185
         Redwater, Texas 75573
         Tel: (903) 278-7437
         E-mail: bert1442@aol.com

The Committee is represented by counsel, John E. Howland, of
Rosenstein, Fist & Ringold.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on June 26, 2018, the
U.S. Trustee for Region 20 on June 22 appointed Messrs. Martin and
Verrebelyi to serve on the Committee.  

                      About Nichols Brothers

Nichols Brothers, Inc., and its debtor subsidiaries are primarily
focused on oil and gas production operating approximately 400
producing wells, which are generally considered "stripper wells" in
the industry.  The debtors constitute a diverse business group
owned and operated by Richard and Orville Nichols that have been in
existence for over 40 years.  They collectively employ 25
individuals with an additional 20 contractors that provide services
out in the field.  Nichols Brothers is headquartered in Tulsa,
Oklahoma.

Nichols Brothers and its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions
(Bankr. N.D. Okla. Lead Case No. 18-11123) on June 1, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Richard Nichols, president, Nichols Brothers
disclosed $10,388 in assets and $32.87 million in liabilities.  The
case is assigned to Judge Terrence L. Michael.  Gary M. McDonald,
Esq., Chad J. Kutmas, Esq., and Mary E. Kindelt, Esq., at McDonald
& Metcalf, LLP serve as the Debtors' counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 20 on June 22 appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors.


NN INC: S&P Lowers Corp Credit Rating to 'B', Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term issuer credit rating on
Charlotte, N.C.-based precision component manufacturer NN Inc. to
'B' from 'B+'. The outlook is stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we lowered our issue-level ratings to
'B' from 'B+' on the company's senior secured revolver due 2020 and
term loan B due 2021 and 2022. The recovery rating on the debt
remains '3'. The '3' recovery rating indicates lenders can expect
meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 65%) recovery in a default
scenario. We also lowered our rating on NN's $200 million
second-lien term loan due April 2023 to 'CCC+' from 'B-', with a
recovery rating of '6'. The '6' recovery rating indicates our
expectation of negligible (0%-10%; rounded estimate: 5%) recovery
of principal and interest in the event of payment default.

"Our downgrade reflects the reduced likelihood that precision metal
components manufacturer NN Inc. will improve its debt to EBITDA
below 5x on a sustained basis. NN's debt leverage has remained
considerably high for the rating and we estimate debt to EBITDA of
6.6x for 2018 and 6.1x for 2019. Over the next 12-24 months, some
uncertainty remains regarding the sustainability of demand
conditions in some of its end markets. We believe the company could
pursue additional acquisitions to achieve its strategic target of
$1 billion in revenue (compared to pro forma sales of $860 million
for 2018). Given the potential associated integration expenses,
this could further prevent NN from significantly reducing its
currently elevated debt leverage before 2020.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that NN's FOCF
generation is likely to offset some pressure from its highly
leveraged balance sheet over the next two years as the portfolio
mix shifts toward high margin and less capital-intensive
end-markets.

"We could lower the rating on NN over the next 12 months if FOCF to
debt is likely to weaken toward 2% on a sustained basis. This could
occur if the company aggressively pursues debt-funded acquisitions
prior to achieving synergies from its recent Paragon acquisition.
Weakening liquidity could also result in a negative rating action,
especially if reduced free cash flow would increase dependence on
their revolving credit facility.

"We could consider a positive rating action if we believe NN will
maintain debt to EBITDA between 4.0x and 5.0x and FOCF to debt well
over 5% on a sustained basis. This would imply that the company
reduces debt, possibly through an equity offering, and remains
committed to refraining from undertaking any significant
debt-funded acquisitions or shareholder distributions over the next
12 months. We would also assume the company continues to expand
EBITDA margins toward 22%-23% through reduced costs and increased
productivity after the inclusion of recent acquisitions."



NORTHWEST TERRITORIAL: Trustee Selling Remaining Property
---------------------------------------------------------
Mark Calvert, the Chapter 11 Trustee for Northwest Territorial
Mint, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District
of Washington to authorize the sale at auction, or through private
sale, of the remaining miscellaneous items of the Debtor's
property, that include items located in Dayton, Nevada, and Green
Bay, Wisconsin.

The Trustee must vacate the Dayton, Nevada premises by the end of
July.  It is therefore imperative that he sell the Debtor's
remaining property before that date, otherwise, the Trustee will be
unable to realize any value for the estate for the items located in
Dayton.

While the Trustee has already liquidated substantially all of the
Debtor's assets, he still must liquidate the Remaining Property for
the benefit of the estate.  The majority of the Remaining Property
is comprised of miscellaneous items of property located in Dayton,
Nevada and Green Bay, Wisconsin.  

The Remaining Property includes, but is not limited to the
following: two vehicles, a gun safe, refrigerators, metal detector,
microwaves, a television, retail merchandise furniture, office
furniture, equipment, appliances, and raw materials.  The Trustee
has compiled pictures and written descriptions of much or all of
the Remaining Property, which are described on Exhibit A attached
to the Declaration of Mark Calvert filed in support of the Motion.
However, the Trustee also asks authority to sell any and all
additional items of Remaining Property that may not be on the list,
wherever such property is located.  The Trustee does not, by the
Motion, ask to sell any custom coining dies.

By the Motion, the Trustee asks authority to sell the Remaining
Property by private sale or public auction, whichever he determines
is in the best interest of the estate.  Additionally, Industrial
Assets Corp., which previously purchased substantially all of the
Debtor's equipment and machinery, has expressed a willingness to
assist the Trustee's sale efforts with respect to the Remaining
Property.  He therefore also asks that he be authorized to pay
Industrial Assets a 10% commission on sales of any of the Remaining
Property for which Industrial Assets brings forward a buyer --
whether at an auction conducted by Industrial Assets, or through
private sales.  The sales will be free and clear of liens, claims,
interests, and encumbrances.

The only party, of which the Trustee is aware, that may assert an
interest in the Remaining Property is the Hoffs.  By virtue of the
Relief from Stay Order, the Hoffs have a post-petition lien on all
assets of the bankruptcy estate to secure any administrative claim
they may be allowed under Section 507(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code
that arises from the Trustee's use of the Dayton premises prior to
the time the Trustee vacates.  Additionally, the Hoffs hold an
alleged-prepetition security interest in the estate's assets that
is subject to bona fide dispute for the reasons articulated by the
Trustee in prior pleadings.

It is necessary for the Trustee to quickly consummate the sale of
as much of the Remaining Property as possible.  It is therefore in
the best interests of the estate to waive the 14-day stay under
Fed. R. Bank. P. 6004(h).

                 About Northwest Territorial

Northwest Territorial Mint LLC sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 16-11767) on
April 1, 2016.  The petition was signed by Ross B. Hansen, member.
The Debtor estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of
$10 million to $50 million.

The case is assigned to Judge Christopher M. Alston.

The Debtor was represented by J. Todd Tracy, Esq., at The Tracy Law
Group PLLC.

The official committee of unsecured creditors, formed on April 15,
2016, retained Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP as its bankruptcy
counsel, and Lorraine Barrick LLC as financial advisor.

On April 11, 2016, Mark Calvert was appointed as Chapter 11 trustee
for the Debtor.  Upon his appointment, the Trustee took control
over the business operations of the Debtor and initiated his
investigation of the financial affairs of the bankruptcy estate.

K&L GATES LLP is counsel to the Trustee.

JAMES G. MURPHY INC. is auctioneer for the Trustee.


OMAR A. DUWAIK: 10th Cir. Affirms Denial of Injunction Bid vs Chase
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned OMAR A. DUWAIK, Appellant, v. JP
MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Successor in Interest by purchase from the
FDIC as Receiver of Washington Mutual Bank, FKA Washington Mutual
Bank FA, Appellee, No. 17-1385 (10th Cir.), the United States Court
of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, remands to the district court to vacate
the order granting JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. relief from the stay
as moot. The Court, however, affirms all other respects of the
district court's judgment against Duwaik.

Chase alleges that it is the holder of a promissory note executed
by appellant Omar Duwaik and secured by several parcels of real
estate, including a house. Duwaik filed for bankruptcy under
Chapter 11, which triggered an automatic stay of all litigation
against him. But when he failed to make payments to Chase under the
terms of the confirmed Chapter 11 plan, Chase moved the bankruptcy
court for relief from the automatic stay so that it could pursue
foreclosure on the real estate. The bankruptcy court granted the
motion, and Duwaik appealed to the United States District Court for
the District of Colorado. While the appeal was pending, Duwaik
sought from the district court an injunction pending appeal to
prevent Chase from foreclosing on the real estate. The district
court affirmed the bankruptcy court's grant of relief from the stay
and denied the request for an injunction. Duwaik appeals the
rulings of the district court.

Duwaik's Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding has been dismissed by the
bankruptcy court, so his challenge to the relief from stay is moot.
And the district court properly refused to consider Duwaik's
request for an injunction because he did not first pursue that
relief in the bankruptcy court.

Under 11 U.S.C. section 362(c)(2)(B), a stay in a Chapter 11
bankruptcy proceeding expires when the proceeding is dismissed. At
this point, setting aside the order lifting the stay would
therefore accomplish nothing. Because the appeal of the district
court's order can have no real-world consequences, the issue is
moot and the Court lacks jurisdiction to address the matter.

The Court also rejects Duwaik's challenge to the district court's
denial of his request for an injunction pending appeal. Under Fed.
R. Bankr. P. 8007(a)(1)(C), a party in a bankruptcy proceeding who
is seeking "an order suspending, modifying, restoring or granting
an injunction while an appeal is pending" ordinarily must first
move for relief in the bankruptcy court. Doing so is excused only
if the party can "show that moving first in the bankruptcy court
would be impracticable." The district court did not abuse its
discretion when it refused to consider Duwaik's request for
injunctive relief because he had neither pursued relief in the
bankruptcy court nor attempted to show that first filing a motion
in the bankruptcy court would have been impracticable.

A full-text copy of the Court's Order and Judgment dated July 12,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2O9mjBJ from Leagle.com.

Omar A. Duwaik filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D. Colo. Case No. 18-15412) on June 21, 2018.


ORION HEALTHCORP: Governmental Bar Date Set for Sept. 12
--------------------------------------------------------
The deadline for filing of proofs of claims by governmental
entities against Orion Healthcorp, et al., has been set for
September 12, 2018 at 5:00 p.m.

Should one choose to file a proof of claim form at this time,
completed forms can be sent to the following addresses:

  If by First-Class Mail:
  Orion HealthCorp, Inc.
  Claims Processing Center
  c/o Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC
  P.O. Box 4419
  Beaverton, OR 97076-4419

      -- or --

  If by Hand Delivery or Overnight Mail:
  Orion HealthCorp, Inc.
  Claims Processing Center
  c/o Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC
  10300 SW Allen Blvd.
  Beaverton, OR 97005

The General Claims Bar Date was set for July 5, 2018.

                   About Orion HealthCorp

Constellation Healthcare Technologies, Inc., is a healthcare
services organization providing outsourced revenue cycle
management, practice management, and group purchasing services to
U.S. physicians.  Orion Healthcorp, et al. --
http://www.orionhealthcorp.com/-- are a consolidated enterprise of
several companies aggregated through a series of acquisitions,
which operate the following businesses: (a) outsourced revenue
cycle management for physician practices, (b) physician practice
management, (c) group purchasing services for physician practices,
and (d) an independent practice association business, which is
organized and directed by physicians in private practice to
negotiate contracts with insurance companies on their behalf while
those physicians remain independent and which also provides other
services to those physician practices.  Orion has locations in
Houston, Texas; Jericho, New York; Lakewood, Colorado;
Lawrenceville, Georgia; Monroeville, Pennsylvania; and Simi Valley,
California.

Constellation Healthcare Technologies, Inc., along with certain of
its subsidiaries, including Orion Healthcorp, Inc., on March 16,
2018, initiated voluntary proceedings under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code to facilitate an orderly and efficient sale of its
businesses.  The lead case is In re Orion Healthcorp, Inc.
(E.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-71748).

The Debtors have liabilities of $245.9 million.

The Hon. Carla E. Craig is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped DLA Piper US LLP as counsel; Hahn & Hessen LLP,
as conflicts counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc., as restructuring
advisor; Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc., as investment banker; and
Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC as claims and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on April 4, 2018, appointed three
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 cases.  The Committee tapped Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP as its legal counsel, and CBIZ Accounting, Tax
and Advisory of New York, LLC, as its financial advisor.

On July 5, 2018, affiliate New York Network Management, L.L.C.,
followed parent Orion into bankruptcy to implement a deal to sell
its assets for at least $16.5 million.


ORION HEALTHCORP: HealthTek Solutions Named Successful Bidder
-------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Orion Healthcorp has cancelled its
scheduled auction of New York Network Management assets and named
"stalking horse" bidder HealthTek Solutions as the Successful
Bidder. The notice states, "On July 5, 2018, New York Network
Management entered into that certain Asset Purchase Agreement for
the sale of certain of its assets (the 'NYNM Assets') to HealthTek
Solutions (together with any permitted assignee, the 'Purchaser'),
which provides for, among other things, the payment of $16.5
million. Pursuant to the Bidding Procedures Order, the Bid Deadline
was July 17, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. (ET). If no Qualified Bids (other
than Purchaser's Agreement) were submitted by the Bid Deadline, the
Bidding Procedures Order provides that NYNM Management shall not
hold the Auction, but shall proceed with the Sale Hearing to seek
approval of the sale of the NYNM Assets to the Purchaser pursuant
to the Agreement (or any modifications agreed to between NYNM
Management and Purchaser, in consultation with the Committee and
the DIP Agent). Because NYNM Management did not receive any
Qualified Bids by the Bid Deadline, it did not conduct the Auction
and the Purchaser was deemed the Successful Bidder."

                  About Orion HealthCorp

Constellation Healthcare Technologies, Inc., is a healthcare
services organization providing outsourced revenue cycle
management, practice management, and group purchasing services to
U.S. physicians.  Orion Healthcorp, et al. --
http://www.orionhealthcorp.com/-- are a consolidated enterprise of
several companies aggregated through a series of acquisitions,
which operate the following businesses: (a) outsourced revenue
cycle management for physician practices, (b) physician practice
management, (c) group purchasing services for physician practices,
and (d) an independent practice association business, which is
organized and directed by physicians in private practice to
negotiate contracts with insurance companies on their behalf while
those physicians remain independent and which also provides other
services to those physician practices.  Orion has locations in
Houston, Texas; Jericho, New York; Lakewood, Colorado;
Lawrenceville, Georgia; Monroeville, Pennsylvania; and Simi Valley,
California.

Constellation Healthcare Technologies, Inc., along with certain of
its subsidiaries, including Orion Healthcorp, Inc., on March 16,
2018, initiated voluntary proceedings under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code to facilitate an orderly and efficient sale of its
businesses.  The lead case is In re Orion Healthcorp, Inc.
(E.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-71748).

The Debtors have liabilities of $245.9 million.

The Hon. Carla E. Craig is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped DLA Piper US LLP as counsel; Hahn & Hessen LLP,
as conflicts counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc., as restructuring
advisor; Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc., as investment banker; and
Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC as claims and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on April 4, 2018, appointed three
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 cases.  The Committee tapped Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP as its legal counsel, and CBIZ Accounting, Tax
and Advisory of New York, LLC, as its financial advisor.

On July 5, 2018, affiliate New York Network Management, L.L.C.,
followed parent Orion into bankruptcy to implement a deal to sell
its assets for at least $16.5 million.


ORION HEALTHCORP: Kelly Opposes Contracts Assignment in NYNM Sale
-----------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Elizabeth Kelly and Premier
Network Management filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court an
objection to Orion Healthcorp's Sale Motion.  The objection
asserts, "The Debtors are impermissibly cherry-picking one portion
of an executory agreement entered into by the Objecting Parties and
the Debtors, and then attempting to assume and assign that one
portion to its stalking horse bidder without curing the significant
monetary defaults that have accrued under the entire executory
agreement. Section 365(b)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code requires, as
a condition of the assumption and assignment of any executory
agreement, that the Debtors also cure all defaults under the entire
agreement. Elizabeth Kelly founded and created the business which
is now operated by Debtor, New York Network Management, LLC
("NYNM") and its subsidiaries. Barely twelve months before the
initial filing of these consolidated bankruptcy cases, the Debtors
enticed Kelly to sell her business that she had built from the
ground up over more than two decades, and then proceeded, in less
than a year, to default on the payment of the purchase price. The
Debtors agreed to pay cash for the purchase of NYNM, comprised of
three tranches: (i) an upfront amount paid or escrowed at closing
in the approximate amount of $22 million, (ii) a true-up of the
actual working capital of NYNM as of the date of the sale in the
amount of $1,874,662 (the ‘Working Capital Adjustment'), and
(iii) an amount calculated by reference to the earnings of NYNM
during the two years after the sale in the amount of $47,820,437
(the 'Earn-Out Payment'). Although the Debtors made the upfront
cash payment, Kelly received no payment whatsoever on account of
the Working Capital Adjustment or the Earn-Out Payment. Kelly has
filed a proof of claim in the case for such unpaid amounts. Despite
the fact that the Executory Agreements are factually and legally an
integral part of the Purchase Agreement, and despite the fact that
the cure amount to assume and assign the Purchase Agreement totals
$49,695,099, the Notice of Assumption and Assignment filed by the
Debtors in this case attempts to cherry-pick the Executory
Agreements for assumption and assignment to the stalking horse
buyer without paying any cure amount whatsoever. It is axiomatic
that a debtor cannot pick and choose which aspects of an integrated
agreement to assume and cure. Accordingly, the Objecting Parties
object to the assumption and assignment of the Executory Agreements
unless the full cure amount of $49,695,099 is paid to Kelly.
Pursuant to Section 365(b)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, all
monetary defaults must be cured under the entire agreement,
including the full $49 million due pursuant to the unpaid Working
Capital Adjustment and the Earn-Out Payment."

                    About Orion HealthCorp

Constellation Healthcare Technologies, Inc., is a healthcare
services organization providing outsourced revenue cycle
management, practice management, and group purchasing services to
U.S. physicians.  Orion Healthcorp, et al. --
http://www.orionhealthcorp.com/-- are a consolidated enterprise of
several companies aggregated through a series of acquisitions,
which operate the following businesses: (a) outsourced revenue
cycle management for physician practices, (b) physician practice
management, (c) group purchasing services for physician practices,
and (d) an independent practice association business, which is
organized and directed by physicians in private practice to
negotiate contracts with insurance companies on their behalf while
those physicians remain independent and which also provides other
services to those physician practices.  Orion has locations in
Houston, Texas; Jericho, New York; Lakewood, Colorado;
Lawrenceville, Georgia; Monroeville, Pennsylvania; and Simi Valley,
California.

Constellation Healthcare Technologies, Inc., along with certain of
its subsidiaries, including Orion Healthcorp, Inc., on March 16,
2018, initiated voluntary proceedings under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code to facilitate an orderly and efficient sale of its
businesses.  The lead case is In re Orion Healthcorp, Inc.
(E.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-71748).

The Debtors have liabilities of $245.9 million.

The Hon. Carla E. Craig is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped DLA Piper US LLP as counsel; Hahn & Hessen LLP,
as conflicts counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc., as restructuring
advisor; Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc., as investment banker; and
Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC as claims and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on April 4, 2018, appointed three
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 cases.  The Committee tapped Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP as its legal counsel, and CBIZ Accounting, Tax
and Advisory of New York, LLC, as its financial advisor.

On July 5, 2018, affiliate New York Network Management, L.L.C.,
followed parent Orion into bankruptcy to implement a deal to sell
its assets for at least $16.5 million.


ORION HEALTHCORP: Sec. 341 for NYNM Creditors Set for Aug. 3
------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code, a meeting of debtor
New York Network Management, LLC creditors will be held on August
3, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. (prevailing Eastern Time) at the Office of
the United States Trustee, Long Island Federal Courthouse, 560
Federal Plaza – Room 562, Central Islip, NY.

This is the first meeting of creditors required under Section
341(a) of the Bankruptcy Code in all bankruptcy cases.

All creditors are invited, but not required, to attend.  This
meeting of creditors offers the one opportunity in a bankruptcy
proceeding for creditors to question a responsible office of the
Debtor under oath about the company's financial affairs and
operations that would be of interest to the general body of
creditors.

                  About Orion HealthCorp

Constellation Healthcare Technologies, Inc., is a healthcare
services organization providing outsourced revenue cycle
management, practice management, and group purchasing services to
U.S. physicians.  Orion Healthcorp, et al. --
http://www.orionhealthcorp.com/-- are a consolidated enterprise of
several companies aggregated through a series of acquisitions,
which operate the following businesses: (a) outsourced revenue
cycle management for physician practices, (b) physician practice
management, (c) group purchasing services for physician practices,
and (d) an independent practice association business, which is
organized and directed by physicians in private practice to
negotiate contracts with insurance companies on their behalf while
those physicians remain independent and which also provides other
services to those physician practices.  Orion has locations in
Houston, Texas; Jericho, New York; Lakewood, Colorado;
Lawrenceville, Georgia; Monroeville, Pennsylvania; and Simi Valley,
California.

Constellation Healthcare Technologies, Inc., along with certain of
its subsidiaries, including Orion Healthcorp, Inc., on March 16,
2018, initiated voluntary proceedings under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code to facilitate an orderly and efficient sale of its
businesses.  The lead case is In re Orion Healthcorp, Inc.
(E.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-71748).

The Debtors have liabilities of $245.9 million.

The Hon. Carla E. Craig is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped DLA Piper US LLP as counsel; Hahn & Hessen LLP,
as conflicts counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc., as restructuring
advisor; Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc., as investment banker; and
Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC as claims and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on April 4, 2018, appointed three
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 cases.  The Committee tapped Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP as its legal counsel, and CBIZ Accounting, Tax
and Advisory of New York, LLC, as its financial advisor.

On July 5, 2018, affiliate New York Network Management, L.L.C.,
followed parent Orion into bankruptcy to implement a deal to sell
its assets for at least $16.5 million.


OSUM PRODUCTION: S&P Affirms 'CCC+' ICR, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it affirmed its 'CCC+' long-term issuer
credit rating on Osum Production Corp. (OPC), and parent company
Osum Oil Sands Corp. (OOSC). The outlook is stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B'
issue-level rating on the company's senior secured term loan. The
'1' recovery rating on the debt is unchanged, indicating our
expectation of very high (90%-100%; rounded estimate 95%) recovery
in a default scenario."

S&P said, "The ratings on OPC reflect the company's relatively
small production base and development footprint, its high
geographic and product concentration, and our expectation that
credit metrics will remain pressured during the next 12 months. We
expect funds from operations (FFO)-to-debt will remain close to the
lower end of the 0%-12% range in the following 12 months, which we
believe represents characteristics of an unsustainable capital
structure. The company's current cash position and liquidity
sources should allow OPC to meet its funding requirements, so we do
not expect a credit or payment crisis in the near term. However,
the company will need to show more certainty in its ability to
refinance its senior secured notes in the next six months to
maintain its adequate liquidity.

"The stable outlook reflects our view that, under our current
hydrocarbon price assumptions, credit metrics will remain
pressured, with FFO-to-debt remaining in the lower end of the
0%-12% range. We expect the company to maintain an adequate
liquidity profile to support the ratings.

"We could take a negative rating action if OPC's liquidity position
deteriorated such that the company could not meet its financial
commitments and maintenance capital spending requirements, which
could happen if it cannot refinance its senior secured notes within
the next 12 months."

A positive rating action is contingent on the company's ability to
maintain its adequate liquidity profile and improving its credit
metrics with FFO-to-debt consistently above 12%, which should be
achievable if the company successfully executes its expansion
project.



PAUL LEONARD BRUNO: Court Junks Injunction Bid vs C. Potts, et al.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiff Paul Leonard Bruno in the case captioned PAUL LEONARD
BRUNO, Plaintiff, v. C. RICHARD POTTS, ET AL., Defendants, Case No.
17-cv-07225-YGR (N.D. Cal.) has filed an ex parte motion for a
temporary restraining order seeking an order to: (i) enjoin
defendants and certain non-parties from pursuing further default
judgments against him in his ongoing Chapter 11 bankruptcy
proceeding; and (ii) enforce certain orders entered in Bruno's
pending state court dissolution and Chapter 13 bankruptcy
proceedings. Upon analysis, District Judge Lucy H. Koh denied
Bruno's motion.

Bruno argued that the relief will afford him time to retain counsel
who will then be able to "take his case to a trial on the merits[,]
or reach settlements with Defendants."

Requests for temporary restraining orders are governed by the same
general standards that govern the issuance of preliminary
injunctions. In order to obtain such relief, plaintiffs must
establish four factors: (1) they are likely to succeed on the
merits; (2) they are likely to suffer irreparable harm in the
absence of preliminary relief; (3) the balance of equities tips in
their favor; and (4) an injunction is in the public interest.

Putting aside the propriety of Bruno's requests, as it appears the
injunction sought could interfere with the duties of both
California state and bankruptcy courts, Bruno's motion suffers from
numerous fatal defects.

Moreover, Bruno has failed to comply with Rule 65 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure. He seeks a temporary restraining order
without notice but has not certified in writing "any efforts made
to give notice and the reasons why it should not be required." Nor
has he set forth "specific facts in an affidavit or a verified
complaint clearly show[ing] that immediate and irreparable injury,
loss, or damage will result to [him] before the adverse party can
be heard in opposition." Instead, the issues raised and relief
requested in Bruno's complaint are largely unrelated to the relief
he seeks in his instant motion.

Yet another defect can be found in the motion's failure to
establish a likelihood of success on the merits. Likelihood of
success on the merits means a "reasonable probability" of success.
The claims alleged in Bruno's complaint are for legal malpractice,
misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty, each of which
arises solely from defendant Potts' alleged misconduct in
connection with the creation of Bruno's registered domestic
partnership. Not only would these three claims fall short of
entitling Bruno to injunctive relief in the first instance, each
claim is also markedly absent from his motion. Instead, the motion
raises a host of new claims, against multiple named defendants and
non-parties, that are unrelated to the allegations contained in his
complaint.

Because Bruno has failed to show a likelihood of success on the
merits, the Court did not address the remaining factors.

The Court, thus, orders Bruno to show cause in a statement not to
exceed five pages, why the action should not be dismissed for lack
of federal jurisdiction, or, alternatively, file an amended
complaint which sets forth a proper basis for jurisdiction.

A full-text copy of the Court's Order dated June 29, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2uSWE7y from Leagle.com.

Paul Leonard Bruno, Beneficiary of the Teresa Bruno Trust and
Beneficiary of the Bruno Family Trust, Plaintiff, pro se.


PEGASUS VIP: Taps Exezidis & Associates as Special Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Pegasus VIP Travel & Tour Services LLC seeks Court authority to
employ Ike Exezidis of Exezidis & Associates, P.C., as special
counsel.

The Firm has an hourly attorney rate of $300 for non-litigation
matters, an hourly attorney rate of $350 for all litigation
matters, an hourly paralegal rate of $125, and expenses billed at
the incurred amount.

The Firm can be reached at:

     Ike Exezidis
     Exezidis & Associates, P.C.
     1631 Dunlavy Street
     Houston, Texas 77006
     Tel No.: (713)522-1199
     Fax No.: (713)529-1884
     Email: ojinnam@hotmail.com

              About Pegasus VIP & Tour Services

Pegasus VIP & Tour Services, LLC, sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 18-32528) on
May 12, 2018.  In the petition signed by its manager/sole member,
Juan Emerson-Caballero, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities
of less than $50,000.  Jesse Aguinaga, Esq., of Aguinaga &
Associates, is the Debtor's counsel.


PES HOLDINGS: Seeks Approval for New Intermediation Facility
------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that PES Holdings filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court a motion seeking approval for certain
implementation conditions with respect to a new intermediation
facility ("the New Intermediation Facility"). The motion explains,
"With this relief sought, the Debtors will be able to emerge from
chapter 11 in advance of their deadline to do so under their
Restructuring Support Agreement (the 'RSA Emergence Deadline').
The Debtors and ICBC Standard Bank Plc ("ICBCS") have been working
to finalize the documentation, implementation and necessary
licenses and internal approvals to consummate the New
Intermediation Facility, and ICBCS has committed to entering into
the New Intermediation Facility with limited conditions that the
Debtors expect will be satisfied, At the same time, the Debtors
have been engaging in good faith discussions with their current
intermediation providers, Merril Lynch Commodities ('MLC') and PES
Inventory Company (PESIC), (together the 'Protected
Counterparties') to effectuate a seamless transition to the new
facility, a challenging task given the interconnectedness of the
intermediation facilities with the Debtor's businesses. The Master
Transaction Term Sheet provides for a full transition to ICSCS of
crude oil intermediation by October 8, 2018, and of refined
products' intermediation by January 15, 2019. "

                       About PES Holdings

Headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, PES Holdings, LLC --
http://pes-companies.com/-- owns an oil refining complex.  The
Philadelphia Energy Solutions Refining Complex operates two
domestic refineries -- Girard Point and Point Breeze -- in South
Philadelphia.  The refinery processes approximately 335,000 barrels
of crude oil per day (42 U.S. gallons per barrel).  In addition to
producing unbranded gasoline (87, 89 and 93 octane), PES also
produces jet fuel, cleaner-burning diesel, petrochemicals,
liquefied petroleum gas and sulfur in the Northeast.  The company
offers a variety of diesels, including ultra-low-sulfur diesel,
non-road, heating oil, locomotive/marine and non-jet kerosene.  PES
employs over 1,000 people. PES is owned by The Carlyle Group and a
subsidiary of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.

PES Holdings and eight of its subsidiaries sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
18-10122) on Jan. 21, 2018.  In the petition signed by Gregory G.
Gatta, manager, PES estimated assets and liabilities of $1 billion
to $10 billion.

The Hon. Kevin Gross is the case judge.

The Debtors hired Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP as their bankruptcy counsel; Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP as local bankruptcy counsel; PJT Partners LP as
financial advisor; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC as
restructuring advisor; and Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy as
claims and noticing agent.

In addition, debtor North Yard GP, LLC, tapped Proskauer Rose LLP
as its conflicts counsel, and Bielli & Klauder, LLC, as co-counsel.
Debtor Philadelphia Energy Solutions Refining and Marketing LLC
tapped Chipman Brown Cicero & Cole, LLP as Delaware counsel, and
Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as its conflicts counsel
substituted by Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP.

The Bankruptcy Court has confirmed a Second Amended Joint
Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization for the Debtors in
March 2018, after the Debtors agreed to amend their plan to
preserve the state of Pennsylvania's right to collect on a $3.8
billion tax claim.


PHOENIX HELIPARTS: Court Narrows Claims in Third-Party Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------
Third Party Defendants Darrin and Tina Cannon, f/d/b/a Phoenix
Heliparts, Inc., in the case captioned Syntelco Limited, Plaintiff,
v. Robert Reish, Defendant, No. CV-17-00598-PHX-JZB (D. Ariz.)
filed a motion to dismiss all claims in Third Party Plaintiff
Robert Reish's Third Party complaint. Specifically, the Cannons
argue that Reish's claims are barred by the doctrine of res
judicata, are inappropriate under Rule 14(a), and erroneously
attempt to hold the Cannons individually liable for equitable
indemnity and contribution where the underlying claims are not
based in tort. Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle grants the motion in
part and denies it in part.

The third-party-litigation stems from the Azerbaijan Ministry of
Defense's suit of Robert Reish over his alleged breach of a
contract between them regarding the purchase and sale of a
helicopter. Defendant Reish asserts that his culpability in the
underlying lawsuit, if any, can be properly attributed to the
Cannons, and filed his TPC against the Cannons concurrently with
his answer to AMOD's complaint.

The Cannons first assert that Reish's TPC claims against them must
be dismissed under the doctrine of res judicata, because Reish
could have raised those claims in the prior bankruptcy proceeding,
which has now issued a final plan. A party asserting the defense of
res judicata is required to establish three elements: (1) privity
between parties in the actions; (2) an identity of claims between
actions; and (3) a final judgment on the merits in the previous
action.

Upon analysis, the Court finds that Reish's fraud claims against
the Cannons did not clearly need to be raised before the bankruptcy
court. Accordingly, the Court will deny the Cannon's Motion to
Dismiss the claims of Reish's TPC as barred by res judicata.

The Cannons also assert that the Court must dismiss the fraud
claims contained in Reish's TPC because they "range far beyond
AMOD's claims, in violation of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Rule 14(a)(1)."

The Court finds that, as plead, Riesh's TPC cannot state a viable
claim for contribution under Arizona law. AMOD has not listed the
Cannons as joint tortfeasors, and any liability assessed to Reish
would necessarily identify him as having committed an intentional
tort. Because a claim for contribution is not permitted in such
instances, Reish's contribution claim against the Cannons is
currently impossible. Reish may seek to have the Cannon's added as
joint tortfeasors, but as of this moment, Reishes claim for
contribution is futile and will be dismissed.

The Cannons also seek to dismiss Reish's claim of equitable
indemnity. Here, the Court finds that Reish has alleged sufficient
facts that, when taken as true, show that the Cannons are the ones
who perpetrated the fraud against AMOD. It is premature to dismiss
Reish's claim of equitable indemnity, based on the potential
affirmative defense of unclean hands. Accordingly, the Court will
deny the Cannon's Motion to Dismiss Reish's claim for equitable
indemnity.

A full-text copy of the Court's Order dated July 9, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2mDfJa4 from Leagle.com.

Syntelco Limited, a Limited Liability Company, Authorized Agent for
Republic of Azerbaijan, Plaintiff, represented by Jacqueline
Michelle Whipple, Dentons US LLP,Michael J. Sullivan, Ashcroft Law
Firm LLC & Steven Martin Aaron, Dentons US LLP.

Robert Reish, an Individual, Defendant, represented by H. Lee
Horner, Jr., Goldstein Horner & Horner Attorneys & Paul L. Cass,
Law Office of Paul L Cass.

Tina M Cannon, Wife & Darin Cannon, Husband, ThirdParty Defendants,
represented by Jeffrey Sinclair Surdakowski, Goldman & Zwillinger
PLLC, Marcus Austin Kelley, Goldman & Zwillinger PLLC & Scott H.
Zwillinger, Goldman & Zwillinger PLLC.

                About Phoenix Heliparts

Phoenix Heliparts Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Arizona (Phoenix) (Case No. 15-12003) on September 18, 2015.

The petition was signed by Tina Cannon, president. The case is
assigned to Judge Daniel P. Collins.

The Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and debts
of $10 million to $50 million.


PHONES PLUS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-----------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Phones Plus PA Inc.

                     About Phones Plus PA

Phones Plus PA, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 18-21948) on May 11,
2018.  In the petition signed by Douglas Parker, president, the
Debtor estimated assets of less than $100,000 and liabilities of
less than $500,000.  The Debtor hired Bononi & Company, P.C. as its
legal counsel.


PLACE FOR ACHIEVING: PCO Files 2nd Report
-----------------------------------------
Joseph J. Tomaino, the duly appointed Patient Care Ombudsman to
Place for Total Health Medical, PC, met with Melanie Cyganowski,
the Chapter 11 trustee, and the Debtor and reviewed the status of
the case, and the lack of viability as it is.  The Trustee directed
the debtor to cease clinical operations.  During this meeting, the
debtor indicated that he has already ceased clinical operations in
the office setting and is exploring other options for his practice
of medicine.
  
The ombudsman raised the issue of the status of medical records.
The practice has a combination of electronic and paper records
maintained in the PATH offices.  There is also storage of archived
medical records in what debtor describes as a metal barn at his
residence in Princeton, New Jersey.  He states there is an employee
of a related company there who can process requests for medical
records.  

The Trustee advised the debtor that he may make a proposal for the
purchase of the medical records and equipment.  After the meeting,
the Trustee advised me that the debtor made an offer for the
records and equipment, which she has not yet responded to.

With the cessation of the practice directed by the trustee and
acknowledged by the debtor, the ombudsman discontinued the
scheduling of site monitoring visits.  During subsequent
conversations with the debtor, it has become apparent to the
ombudsman that the debtor may be continuing clinical
operations—perhaps under a different legal entity—in the same
space.

The ombudsman has brought to the attention on this date that the
debtor may be again operating in the office location.  A site visit
will be made to determine if this activity is under a
different corporate entity, and whether or not the medical records
of PATH are being utilized to provide those services..

Consistent with requirements outlined in Federal Rule of Bankruptcy
Procedure 2015.11, a copy of this report will be provided to each
entity that issues licenses or regulates the debtor. These entities
are the New York State Education Department, Office of the
Professions, Division of Professional Licensing Services, Medicine
Unit, and the New York State Office of Professional Conduct.

A full-text copy of the PCO's Second Report is available for free
at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb-17-13478-0049.0.pdf

             About Place For Achieving Total
                    Health Medical, P.C.

Based in New York, Place for Achieving Total Health Medical, P.C.,
is a small diet, nutrition & weight management company.  It was
founded in 2001.

Place for Achieving Total Health Medical filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-13478) on Dec. 4, 2017.  In
the petition signed by Eric Braverman, M.D., its president, the
Debtor disclosed $1,000 in assets and $7.66 million in
liabilities.

The Hon. Mary Kay Vyskocil presides over the case.

Michael D. Siegel, Esq., at Siegel & Siegel, P.C., serves as the
Debtor's counsel.

On April 23, 2018, the Court entered an order approving the
appointment of Melanie L. Cyganowski as the Chapter 11 Trustee for
the Debtor.  The Trustee hired Otterbourg P.C., as counsel, and
EisnerAmper, LLP, as accountant and financial advisor.

Joseph J. Tomaino was appointed Patient Care Ombudsman.


PREMISE HEALTH: Moody's Assigns B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned first time ratings to Premise
Health Holding Corp. ("Premise"), including a Corporate Family
Rating (CFR) of B3, a Probability of Default Rating (PDR) of B3-PD
and a B2 rating to the proposed first lien senior secured credit
facilities. The proceeds will be used, along with cash equity and a
second lien term loan (unrated) to fund the acquisition of Premise
by OMERS Private Equity. The outlook is stable.

Ratings assigned:

Corporate Family Rating at B3

Probability of Default Rating at B3-PD

$60 million guaranteed senior secured 1st lien revolving credit
facility expiring 2023, B2 (LGD3)

$315 million guaranteed senior secured 1st lien term loan due 2025,
B2 (LGD3)

$25 million delayed draw guaranteed senior secured 1st lien term
loan due 2025, B2 (LGD3)

The rating outlook is stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B3 CFR reflects the company's very high debt/EBITDA following
the leveraged buyout transaction. Moody's estimates adjusted pro
forma debt to EBITDA of 7.9x based on 2017 earnings, declining to
around 7.5x by the end of 2018. The rating is also constrained by
the company's modest absolute scale and the risk of customer
contract losses, either due to changing customer preferences,
competition or a customer' own financial challenges. The rating is
supported by the company's blue chip customer base and good
customer diversity which mitigates some of the risk associated with
contract losses. Premise is paid directly by its corporate clients
and has no direct government reimbursement risk. The company also
has low capital expenditure requirements. As a result, Moody's
expects the company to generate positive free cash flow despite the
high level of debt/EBITDA.

Moody's anticipates good liquidity supported by positive free cash
flow over the next 12-15 months, an undrawn $60 million revolving
credit facility, a $25 million delayed draw term loan and no
financial maintenance covenants on the term loans.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that the company will
remain highly leveraged but will be able to grow earnings as it
adds new customer sites and services in excess of contract losses.

The ratings could be upgraded if Premise generates sustained
positive free cash flow and grows earnings such that Moody's
expects adjusted debt/EBITDA to be sustained below 6.5x.

The ratings could be downgraded if, for any reason, operating
performance or liquidity deteriorates. If free cash flow is not
expected to be positive or if adjusted debt/EBITDA increases from
current levels, the ratings could be downgraded.

Premise is one of the leading providers of employer-sponsored
onsite health and wellness clinics and pharmacies in the US,
operating over 600 clinics across 45 states. The company generated
revenue of nearly $700 million in 2017.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.



PREMISE HEALTH: S&P Assigns B Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it assigned its 'B' issuer credit
rating to Tennessee-based Premise Health Holding Corp. The outlook
is stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned our 'B' issue-level rating
and '3' recovery rating to the company's first-lien credit
facility, which consists of a $60 million revolving credit facility
due in 2023, a $315 million term loan due in 2025, and a $25
million delayed-draw term loan due in 2025. The '3' recovery rating
indicates expectations for meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate:
65%) recovery in the event of a default.

"We also assigned our 'CCC+' issue-level rating and '6' recovery
rating to the company's second-lien credit facility, which consists
of a $135 million term loan due in 2026. The '6' recovery rating
indicates expectations for negligible (0%-10%; rounded estimate:
0%) recovery in the event of a default."

The ratings on Premise reflect the company's narrow operating focus
in the highly competitive and still-evolving direct health care
market, which includes low entry barriers and below-average
profitability for health care providers. Partially offsetting these
factors are the company's leading market position, high client
retention rate, and attractive contract structures providing margin
stability and mitigating reimbursement risk.  

Premise is the largest U.S. provider of employer-sponsored direct
health care solutions, including primary care, occupational health,
pharmacy services, and other complementary services primarily for
commercial employers with large workforces. The company's client
and revenue base is diverse, as it manages over 600 health centers
throughout 45 states, services over 275 clients, and employs over
3,500 health care providers. While primary care accounts for almost
half of Premise's revenue, approximately a quarter of the company's
revenues are derived from the company's more than 50 on-site
pharmacies operated in partnership with Walgreens. Although
pharmacy is a steady source of revenue, it is a relatively much
lower-margin business.  

With a focus on preventative care and programs to ensure patient
adherence, Premise aims to lower clients' overall health care
spending by reducing utilization of preventable higher acuity
inpatient and specialty care. While Premise enjoys a leading 30%
market share, operating twice as many clinics and offering a
broader variety of ancillary services than its closest pure-play
competitor, S&P believes the fledgling direct health care market
remains fragmented and rapidly evolving. The value proposition of
lower overall health care spending by improving primary care use
and adherence is well established, with a number of competing
organizations such as physician groups, medical staffers, and
urgent care facilities targeting the same need. S&P believes the
industry's low entry barriers would allow any of these
organizations to make a move into direct health care and compete
directly with Premise for new contracts or to replace Premise staff
at existing sites when contracts come due.

S&P said, "Aside from industry considerations, we believe there are
several factors creating meaningful risk to Premise's
profitability. The company earns revenue by contracting with large
self-funded employers to create, staff, and manage on-site health
clinics providing low acuity primary and preventative care to
covered employees. The company's mandate to decrease its clients'
overall health care costs is achieved primarily by reducing the
need for high-cost care. But it must also provide primary care at
or below market costs, limiting Premise's pricing power and
lowering margins. While contractual relationships mitigate
reimbursement risk faced by other health care providers, changes to
primary care reimbursement indirectly affects Premise. Our view of
the company's profitability is aided by its contract structures,
which help maintain margin stability. Contracts are set at a flat
rate or at a cost plus fee, both with set annual price increases
and clauses that allow Premise to pass on rising costs to clients.
Furthermore, the company maintains a capex-light cost structure by
having clients provide all upfront capex, resulting in a highly
variable cost structure and strong free cash flow.

"Offsetting the negative risk factors is our view of the dynamics
of the health care industry continuing to evolve favorably for
players like Premise. We believe such players offer an attractive
value proposition for both employers and patients seeking
alternatives in an increasing cost environment. Stakeholders
recognize that deductible increases aimed at reducing utilization
and maintaining costs have created the unintended effect of
decreasing primary care utilization but increasing costs through
higher acuity utilization. We view Premise as well positioned to
help reverse this trend, with a large majority of the self-funded
employer market not offering any form of direct health care,
providing ample whitespace. Premise has opportunities to increase
service lines and clinics with existing clients, as well as to
leverage its leading position and prestigious client list to win
new contracts at a faster rate than competitors can. We also
believe Premise's strategy of accessing patient populations through
aggregators, in this case employers, is replicable with other large
aggregators such as insurers.

"Furthermore, we expect the company to increase top-line growth
through employees' dependents who are equally covered but not
necessarily in proximity to an on-site clinic. Premise aims to
address this patient population by creating exclusive near-site
clinics in suburban hubs densely populated with covered lives.
While Premise would be responsible for upfront costs at such sites,
the higher volume could increase revenue considerably. We believe
the company will begin opening such sites in late 2018 and into
2019.

"Premise's highly leveraged financial risk profile reflects its
high-single-digit leverage at close, which we expect will improve
to the high-6x area in fiscal 2019 as the company executes its
growth strategy without incremental debt incurrence, significantly
increasing EBITDA. We expect the company to have $20 million
reported free cash inflow in 2018, increasing to about $30 million
free operating cash flow (FOCF) in 2020 should it achieve growth as
planned.

S&P's base-case forecast includes the following assumptions:

-- Mid-single–digit percentage revenue increase in 2018 and
low-double–digit percentage increase in 2019 as the company ramps
up its near-site growth strategy while increasing new contracts and
service offerings to existing customers.

-- Adjusted EBITDA margins around 8% in 2018, burdened by Epic
Systems software implementation costs, improving 150 basis points
(bps) in 2020 as the company expands its high-margin services.

-- Annual capex of $11 million over the next few years.

-- Modest working capital outflows.
Based on these assumptions, S&P arrives at the following credit
measures:

-- Leverage around 8x in 2018 and mid-6x area in 2020.

-- Funds from operations (FFO) to debt around 8% through 2020.

-- Reported free cash flow of about $20 million in 2018,
increasing to $30 million in 2020.

S&P said, "Our assessment of Premise's liquidity as adequate
reflects our expectation that sources of cash will exceed uses by
at least 1.2x over the next 12 months, and that sources will exceed
uses even if EBITDA were to decline by 15%. While we believe the
company could withstand adverse market conditions over the next 12
months, it might not absorb a high-impact, low-probability event
such as a major change in primary care reimbursement or a
large-scale malfunction in its software without refinancing. We
believe the company demonstrates generally prudent risk management.
The company has a net first-lien leverage covenant on the revolving
credit facility in effect at close. We expect the company will have
ample headroom under this covenant."

Principal liquidity sources:

-- Cash and cash equivalent of about $8.5 million as of March 31,
2018;

-- A fully available $60 million revolving credit facility; and

-- About $37 million of FFO.

Principal liquidity uses:

-- Pro forma annual debt amortization of about $3.1 million;

-- Working capital requirement of about $5 million; and

-- Capex of about $11 million annually.

S&P said, "Our stable rating outlook reflects our expectation that
Premise will deliver high-single-digit percentage organic revenue
growth and healthy free cash flow of approximately $30 million per
year over the next few years, supported by its leading position in
the direct health care market.

"We could lower the rating if Premise's free cash flow dips below
$10 million with no clear prospect of recovery.
Slower-than-expected top-line growth, coupled with approximately
100 bps of margin decrease, could lead to such a scenario. This
will likely be a result of heightened competition, economic
downturn, or unforeseen adverse events such as an unfavorable legal
ruling.

"While unlikely over the next 12 months, we could consider raising
the rating if Premise sustainably lowers leverage to below 5x,
which would likely require double-digit percentage revenue growth
in addition to significant margin improvement. However, we would
likely view any improvement in credit metrics as temporary given
our view that the company's financial sponsor ownership would
support aggressive financial policies. We could also raise the
rating if the company improves its business risk by increasing its
scale while also maintaining current solid EBITDA margins."



PUGLIA ENGINEERING: Taps Larson Gross as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------
Puglia Engineering, Inc. received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Washington to hire Larson Gross
PLLC as its accountant.

The firm will assist the Debtor in reviewing its financial
statements and tax returns.

Larson Gross neither represents nor holds any interest adverse to
the interest of the Debtor's estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Daniel Obbink
     Larson Gross PLLC
     2211 Rimland Dr., Suite 422
     Bellingham, WA  98226
     Phone: 360 734 4280
     Fax: 360 734 4893

                     About Puglia Engineering

Puglia Engineering Inc. -- http://pugliaengineering.com/-- is a
ship builder and repairer based in Tacoma, Washington. It is a
privately-held company founded in 1991.  The company has locations
in Tacoma, Washington; Fairhaven, Massachusetts; and Oakland,
California.

Puglia Engineering sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 18-41324) on April 14,
2018.  In the petition signed by Neil Turney, president, the Debtor
disclosed $14.26 million in assets and $21.13 million in
liabilities.

Judge Brian D. Lynch presides over the case.

James L. Day, Esq., at Bush Kornfeld LLP, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee for Region 18 appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors on May 3, 2018.  The committee
retained CKR Law LLP as its legal counsel; DBS Law, as local
counsel; McKool Smith, P.C., as special litigation counsel.


RELATIVITY MEDIA: Not Allowed to Retain Winston & Strawn as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Michael E. Wiles denied Debtors Relativity Media,
LLC's application for entry of an order authorizing the retention
of Winston & Strawn LLP as attorneys for the debtors.

The debtors' application includes a declaration by an attorney from
the Winston & Strawn firm that discloses the fact that Winston &
Strawn, at the time of that declaration, was acting as counsel for
Netflix, Inc. and for an affiliate of Netflix, Inc., in a patent
litigation pending in the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware. Winston & Strawn's representation of Netflix
in that matter precedes its representation of the debtors.

Netflix filed an objection dated June 11, 2018. Netflix argues that
Winston & Strawn's representation of the Relativity debtors in
disputes with Netflix would violate the professional obligations
that Winston & Strawn owed to Netflix. Netflix represented that
certain ethical issues would need to be pursued in California and
not in this Court.

The Office of the United States Trustee has also filed an objection
dated July 2, 2018. The United States Trustee has argued that
Winston & Strawn's concurrent representation of Netflix and of the
debtors creates an actual conflict of interest that bars the
retention of Winston & Strawn under section 327. Whereas Netflix
sought to bar the retention solely to the extent of disputes
against Netflix, the United States Trustee has sought to bar the
retention in its entirety.

In analyzing the case, the Court holds that even if no
disqualification motion has actually been filed, Netflix is correct
that it would not be in the interests of the debtors to retain
Winston & Strawn unless separate counsel were identified to handle
the disputes with Netflix, because it is likely that Winston &
Strawn would be disqualified from handling the disputes with
Netflix. So unless something new is raised, to the extent that the
retention application has not carved out the disputes with Netflix
and required them to be handled by other counsel, the Court would
not be willing to approve it.

The Court is aware that if Winston & Strawn is disqualified from
handling the litigation it could have devastating effects on the
Relativity debtors. It will almost undoubtedly affect the
litigation schedule and the other proceedings that have been
scheduled. But Netflix also has rights here, which it has
diligently sought to protect. The debtors and Winston & Strawn, for
their own reasons, proceeded with their eyes open and with full
awareness of the risks of proceeding that way. To some extent, it
was a bit reckless to do so. And while it might be harmful to the
debtors, the Court cannot allow that to override Netflix's rights
here.

And so, unless something new is raised, the debtors will be
required, as a condition of retaining Winston & Strawn, to find
other counsel to handle the Netflix disputes.

The bankruptcy case is in re: RELATIVITY MEDIA, LLC, et al.,
Chapter 11, Debtors, Case No. 18-11358 (MEW) (Jointly Administered)
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Bench Decision dated July 6, 2018
is available at https://bit.ly/2NBqvsZ from Leagle.com.

Relativity Media, LLC, Debtor, represented by Carrie V. Hardman --
chardman@winston.com -- Winston & Strawn, LLP, Daniel J. McGuire --
dmcguire@winston.com -- Winston & Strawn LLP & Carey D. Schreiber
-- cschreiber@winston.com -- Winston & Strawn LLP.

United States Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Benjamin J.
Higgins, Office of the United States Trustee.

Prime Clerk, LLC, Claims and Noticing Agent, represented by Adam M.
Adler, Prime Clerk LLC.

OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, Creditor Committee,
represented by Minyao Wang, Robins Kaplan.

                  About Relativity Media

Relativity -- http://relativitymedia.com/-- is a global media
company engaged in multiple aspects of content production and
distribution, including movies, television, sports, digital and
music.

Relativity Studios, the company's largest division, has produced,
distributed or structured financing for more than 200 motion
pictures, generating more than $17 billion in worldwide box-office
revenue and earning 60 Oscar nominations.  Relativity's films
include Oculus, Safe Haven, Act of Valor, Immortals, Limitless, and
The Fighter.

Relativity Media LLC and its affiliates, including Relativity
Fashion, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-11989) on July 30, 2015.  The
case is assigned to Judge Michael E. Wiles.

An investor group composed of Anchorage Capital Group, L.L.C.,
Falcon Investment Advisors, LLC and Luxor Capital Group, LP on Oct.
21, 2015, completed its purchase of the assets of Relativity
Television.

After selling their TV business, the Debtors and CEO Ryan C.
Kavanaugh filed a plan of reorganization that contemplated
reorganizing the Debtors' non-TV business units with a
substantially de-levered balance sheet utilizing new equity
investments and new financing.  The Court on Feb. 8, 2016,
confirmed the Debtors' Fourth Amended Plan.

Relativity Media and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-11358)
on May 3, 2018.  This is the company's second trip to Chapter 11.
In the 2018 petition signed by CRO Colin M. Adams, Relativity Media
estimated assets of $100 million to $500 million and liabilities of
$500 million to $1 billion.

Judge Michael E. Wiles presides over the cases.

In the 2015 cases, the Debtors tapped Sheppard Mullin Richter &
Hampton LLP, and Jones Day as counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc., as
crisis and turnaround management services provider; Blackstone
Advisory Partners L.P. as investment; and Donlin, Recano & Company,
Inc., as claims and noticing agent.

In the 2018 cases, the Debtors tapped Winston & Strawn LLP as their
legal counsel; M-III Partners, LP as restructuring advisor; and
Prime Clerk LLC as noticing and claims consultant.

On May 18, 2018, the Office of the United States Trustee appointed
an official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee
selected Robins Kaplan LLP to serve as counsel.

                          *     *     *

In the 2018 cases, Netflix, Inc., has a pending request before the
Court for the appointment of a trustee to manage the operations of
the Debtors.


REMODELING SERVICES: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Remodeling Services & Complete Restoration, Inc.
        2390 W Main St
        Greenfield, IN 46140

Business Description: Remodeling Services & Complete Restoration,
                      Inc. provides restoration, remodeling and
                      new construction services.  The Company's
                      corporate headquarters are located in
                      Greenfield, Indiana.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 25, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Indiana (Indianapolis)

Case No.: 18-05638

Judge: Hon. Robyn L. Moberly

Debtor's Counsel: KC Cohen, Esq.
                  KC COHEN, LAWYER, PC
                  151 N Delaware St Ste 1106
                  Indianapolis, IN 46204
                  Tel: 317-715-1845
                  Fax: 317-916-0406
                  Email: kc@esoft-legal.com
                         kc@smallbusiness11.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Mike Clark, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/insb18-05638.pdf


ROLLING HILLS: Seeks Authority for Further Cash Collateral Use
--------------------------------------------------------------
Rolling Hills Farm Investments, LLC, doing business as Celebrity
Hotel & Casino, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
South Dakota for preliminary authorization to use cash collateral
of $216,636 on or before July 15, 2018 and final authorization to
use total cash collateral of $500,145 in the operation of its
business.

Of the $500,145 total authorization sought, the Debtor requires
emergency use of $126,000 to purchase the gaming stamps and an
additional $90,636 in cash collateral between July 1, 2018 through
July 15, 2018 to pay operating expenses, including inventory costs,
gaming expenses, employee wages, utilities, rent, and other
expenses essential to ongoing operation.

The Debtor asserts that continued use of cash collateral is
necessary to the maintenance of the Debtor's business and vital to
the Debtor's reorganization. Otherwise, the Debtor will suffer
immediate and irreparable harm if unable to use cash collateral.

At the time of filing the petition, First Interstate Bank held a
Collateral Real Estate Mortgage covering the real estate owned by
the Debtor.  Further, First Interstate Bank held a blanket security
interest in certain personal property owned by the Debtor pursuant
to two Commercial Security Agreements.  Under the security
agreements, collateral includes all accounts and proceeds from the
operation of the Debtor's business

The Debtor and First Interstate Bank have previously entered into a
stipulation for the use of cash collateral until June 30, 2018.
The Court has approved this prior agreement and authorized Debtor
to use up to $502,858.

Recently, the Debtor has submitted a proposed stipulation for the
future use of cash collateral to First Interstate Bank, which has
been rejected.  Accordingly, the Debtor requests the Court
preliminary authorization for the future use of cash collateral and
that the Court set a deadline for First Interstate Bank and other
creditors to object to its request for preliminary authorization
and a subsequent hearing on the request at the earliest date
allowable.

The Debtor proposes to provide First Interstate Bank with adequate
protection by paying the sum of $20,000, which the Debtor believes
as sufficient given adequate protection of $25,000 on the previous
3 month agreement. The adequate protection payments will be made
one-half ($10,000.00) on or before July 25, 2018 and one-half
($10,000.00) on or before August 25, 2018.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/sdb17-50240-153.pdf

               About Rolling Hills Farm Investments

Rolling Hills Farm Investments, LLC, operates a hotel and casino,
doing business as Celebrity Hotel & Casino, in Deadwood, South
Dakota.

Rolling Hills sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. S.D. Case No. 17-50240) on Nov. 1, 2017.  In the
petition signed by Brian E. Holcomb, president, the Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.
Judge Charles L. Nail, Jr. presides over the case.

Anker Law Group, P.C., is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel; and Nipe
Accounting & Consulting, Prof LLC, serves as accountant to the
Debtor.


ROTHROCK FAMILY: Kolofia Buying Tucson Property for $715K
---------------------------------------------------------
Rothrock Family, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Arizona to authorize the sale of the real property
located at 1050 E. 19th St., Tucson, Arizona, together with all
buildings, improvements, and fixtures thereon, to Kolofia, LLC for
$715,000.

In 2005, Todd Rothrock, Kelly Rothrock, and Trevor Rothrock formed
the Debtor.  The purpose of forming the Debtor was to hold the Real
Property.  The Debtor owns no assets other than the Real Property.
It has no employees and has no bank accounts, other than its DIP
account.  The Debtor has never made a distribution to any member.

The Real Property consists of approximately 36,500 square feet and
is zoned for light industrial activity.  The Real Property consists
of a warehouse space occupied by Rothrock Building & Remodeling
Inc., doing business as Steel Dor.  Trevor Rothrock is the
president/CEO of Steel Dor.  Steel Dor manufactures and installs
doors for residential and commercial properties across southern
Arizona.  Steel Dor pays all ongoing expenses of the Debtor.

There is no operative written lease between Steel Dor and the
Debtor.  Steel Dor will quit possession when the Buyer takes
possession of the Real Property.

The Debtor has only two creditors: The Pima County Treasurer and
the Gibsons.  In April 2016, the Debtor received a loan in the
original principal amount of $525,000 from the Gibsons.  The Loan
is secured against a deed of trust on the Real Property.  In late
2017, the Debtor received a notice of acceleration based on its
failure to maintain current payments of property taxes, which the
Gibsons asserted to be a default on the Loan.

Accordingly, the Gibsons pursued nonjudicial foreclosure of the
Real Property via trustee's sale that was scheduled for 10:00 a.m.
April 16, 2018.  The Debtor filed its voluntary bankruptcy petition
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on April 16, 2018 at
approximately 9:30 a.m. to prevent the foreclosure of the Real
Property.  The Debtor filed bankruptcy with the intent of marketing
the Real Property to ensure that it received maximum recovery for
the Debtor and prevent the risk of a deficiency.

The Debtor believes that the sale of the Real Property will
generate sufficient proceeds to pay all creditors of the Debtor's
estate including secured, unsecured, and administrative creditors.

Appraiser James Bradley of Axia Real Estate Appraisers valued the
Real Property at $725,000.  William Mordka listed the Real Property
for the appraised value on MLS as well as a separate listing
service Loopnet/costar.  After several showings, Mr. Mordka
received two offers: one for $650,000 from Long Far Investments,
LLC, and a second offer for $700,000, from the Buyer.

The Debtor has entered into the Commercial Real Estate Purchase
Contract with the Buyer.  The current members of the Debtor are
Trevor and Kelly Rothrock, both of whom signed the Purchase
Agreement.

Under the Purchase Agreement, an aggregate 6% commission equal to
$42,900 is to be split evenly and paid to Phil Lipman of Bright
Properties and William Mordka of Harvey Mordka Realty.

The Real Property is subject to a tax lien from 2017 real property
taxes in the approximate sum of $6,387.  It is subject to the
Gibsons' Loan and the Gibsons' deed of trust against the Real
Property.  As of June 19, 2018, the payoff amount of the Gibsons'
Loan is $573,307.  The Gibsons' Loan and the Pima County
Treasurer's Office are the only secured creditors known to the
Debtor.  Interest continues to accrue on the Gibsons' Loan at a
rate of $148 per diem.

The Debtor asks the Court to authorize the sale of the Real
Property free and clear of liens, claims, encumbrances, and
interests; and the payment of closing costs related thereto,
including the Broker Commission, the Gibsons' Loan, and the Pima
County Treasurer's Office.

The Buyer needs the assurance that all sales are final and
non-appealable. Accordingly, the Debtor asks that the Court
eliminates the 14-day stay period under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h).

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Rothrock_Family_35_Sales.pdf

                    About Rothrock Family

Rothrock Family LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 18-03956) on April 16,
2018.  In the petition signed by Trevor Rothrock, member, the
Debtor estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of
less than $1 million.  Judge Scott H. Gan presides over the case.

On May 7, 2018, the Court approved the employment of William Mordka
as the broker, and James Bradley of Axia Real Estate Appraisers as
appraiser.


ROTINI INC: Court Directs DOJ Watchdog to Appoint Ch. 11 Trustee
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge S. Martin Teel, Jr., issued a memorandum decision and order
directing the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee and addressing
matters related to conversion or dismissal of Rotini, Inc.'s
chapter 11 case.

The hearing of June 14, 2018, addressed the District of Columbia's
Motion to Dismiss or Convert Debtor's Chapter 11 Proceeding; the
United States Trustee's Motion to Convert Case to Chapter 7; and
the debtor's Motion for Reconsideration of Memorandum Decision and
Order re District of Columbia's Motion for Summary Judgment.

The court determined that the latter motion had to be denied: there
was no error in granting the District of Columbia's motion for
summary judgment. However, in granting that motion, the court ruled
that conversion or dismissal was required on the basis that the
debtor had not urged that the court should appoint a trustee. At
the hearing, the United States Trustee requested the appointment of
a Chapter 11 trustee, and the prior ruling on the District of
Columbia's motion for summary judgment did not preclude
consideration of that request. The Bankruptcy Code, under 11 U.S.C.
section 1112(b)(1), contemplates that the case ought not be
dismissed or converted when the court determines that appointment
of a trustee is in the best interests of creditors and the estate.
The court determined that appoint of a Chapter 11 trustee was
warranted.

The court concluded that a Chapter 11 trustee will adequately
protect the District of Columbia's interests if the case is not
immediately converted to Chapter 7 or dismissed, and that
appointing a Chapter 11 trustee made sense.s

Although the Court will not dismiss or convert the case at this
juncture, the Court will not dismiss the pending motions regarding
conversion or dismissal of the case. Instead, the Court will defer
acting on those motions until the Chapter 11 trustee is in a
position to be heard on those matters (conversion or dismissal or
pursuit of a Chapter 11 plan) that a trustee is required to address
under 11 U.S.C. section 1106(a)(5).

In light of the foregoing, the Court orders that the United States
Trustee must appoint a trustee.

Further, the hearing on the District of Columbia's Motion to
Dismiss or Convert Debtor's Chapter 11 Proceeding and the United
States Trustee's Motion to Convert Case to Chapter 7 is continued
to August 22, 2018, at 10:30 a.m., but for cause shown by motion
may be re-set for an earlier or later date.

The bankruptcy case is in re: ROTINI, INC., Chapter 11, Debtor,
Case No. 17-00270 (Bankr. D.D.C.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision and Order dated
June 27, 2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2uTk1xE from
Leagle.com.

Rotini, Inc., Debtor In Possession, represented by Richard L.
Gilman, Gilman & Edwards, LLC.

U. S. Trustee for Region Four, U.S. Trustee, represented by Joseph
A. Guzinski , U. S. Trustee's Office.

                   About Rotini Inc.

Located in Washington, DC, Rotini Inc. is a small business debtor
as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51D) and is engaged in the
restaurants business.  It first sought bankruptcy protection on
June 14, 2013 (Bankr. D.D.C. Case No. 13-00380) and then on Sept.
23, 2014 (Bank. D.D.C. Case No. 14-00514).

Rotini, Inc., and affiliate TK Restaurant Management, Inc., sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.D.C.
Case Nos. 17-00270 and 17-00269) on May 6, 2017.  In the petitions
signed by president Karen Kowkabi, Rotini estimated assets of less
than $50,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million, and TK
Restaurant estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of
less than $1 million.

Judge S. Martin Teel, Jr. presides over the cases.  

Gilman & Edwards, LLC, is the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.


SAMMY ELJAMAL: J. Weil, et al.'s Bid for Leave to Appeal Junked
---------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Nelson S. Roman denied the Defendants' motion for
leave to appeal in the case captioned SAMMY ELJAMAL, individually
and as Managing Member of NY FUEL HOLDINGS, LLC; NY FUEL
DISTRIBUTORS, LLC; NY DEALER STATIONS, LLC; NY DEALER STATIONS
MANAGEMENT, on behalf of himself as an investor of NY FUEL
HOLDINGS, LLC; METRO NY DEALER STATIONS, LLC, and all other
investors therein, Plaintiffs, v. JAMES A. WEIL, LEON SILVERMAN, NY
FUEL HOLDINGS, LLC; METRO NY DEALER STATIONS, LLC; NY DEALER
STATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC; NY FUEL DISTRIBUTORS, LLC; NY DEALER
STATIONS LLC, and AMSTERDAM 181 REALTY LLC. Defendants, No.
17-cv-00609 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y.).

Plaintiff/Debtor Sammy Eljamal initiated an action against the
Defendants/Appellants in the Commercial Division of New York State
Supreme Court, Westchester County (the "State Court Action"). After
filing a Voluntary Chapter 11 Petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York, the Debtor's State Court
Action was removed to federal court and referred to the Bankruptcy
Court. Debtor thereafter filed a motion for summary judgment on the
issue of his ownership in NYFH, Metro, and NYDSM (Companies), and
on Dec. 28, 2016, Judge Robert D. Drain of the Bankruptcy Court
issued an Order on Debtor's motion, concluding, inter alia, that
Debtor held a 50% interest in ownership of the Companies.
Defendants/Appellants' moved for Leave to appeal this aspect of the
December 28 Decision.

Appellant's argument that the order is effectively unreviewable
because, "[i]f the bankruptcy is completed and a plan is confirmed
prior to the resolution of an appeal of the Summary Judgment Order,
the appeal will be moot," is unavailing. Appellants' reliance on
the proposition that "[w]hen a plan of reorganization has been
substantially consummated, an appeal is presumed moot" is belied by
the very authority proffered by Apellants in support thereof. While
on its face the argument seems tenable, Appellants' omit a critical
element -- that prior to substantial consummation of the
reorganization plan, the parties' bear the burden of obtaining a
stay of the bankruptcy proceeding while the attendant issues are on
appeal.  Appellants proffer no other arguments in support of their
claim that the December 28 Decision falls within the collateral
order doctrine, and thus have failed to convince this Court to
apply the doctrine.

Even if they had, the issue they seek to appeal is not effectively
unreviewable. In the context of Bankruptcy cases, an order is
considered final, and thus appealable as of right, where it
"finally dispose[s] of discrete disputes within the larger case."
The December 28 Decision did not dispose of the entire adversary
proceeding, as it denied one of the grounds for summary judgment;
however, when the adversary proceeding is concluded, the resulting
order will be a final order, appealable as of right and Appellants
will have an opportunity to seek review of the declaration that
Debtor is entitled to 50% ownership in the Companies.  The
collateral order doctrine is inapplicable.

While the issue of Debtor's ownership interest is of central
importance to the adversary proceeding, its resolution turns on a
question of contract interpretation, hardly the type of issue
contemplated by the interlocutory appeal exception to the general
rule favoring finality.

Moreover, there is no evidence that interlocutory appeal would
materially advance the outcome of the adversary proceeding.
Appellants' conclusory argument to the contrary is unconvincing
particularly in light of Debtor's position that this issue is only
one of eight to be resolved in the adversary proceeding. Thd Court
declines to exercise its discretion under Section 158(a)(3).

Thus, Defendtans’Appellants' motion for leave to appeal is
denied, as the December 28 Decision is an interlocutory order not
immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine and the
Court otherwise declines to exercise its discretion to permit the
appeal.

The bankruptcy case is in re: Sammy Eljamal, Case No.:
15-22872(RDD) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated June 29,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2LdTMNj from Leagle.com.

James A. Weil, Leon Silverman, NY Fuel Holdings, LLC, Metro NY
Dealer Stations, LLC, NY Dealer Stations Management, LLC, NY Fuel
Distributors, LLC & NY Dealer Stations, LLC, Appellants,
represented by Jonathan D. Kraut -- jkraut@hkplaw.com -- Friedman,
Harfenist, Langer & Kraut, LLP & Steven Jay Harfenist --
shargenist@hkplaw.com -- Freidman, Harfenist, Langer & Kraut.

Sammy Eljamal, individually and as Managing Member of NY Fuel
Holdings, LLC; etc., Appellee, represented by Anne Julia Penachio ,
Penachio Malera, L.L.P., Philip M. Halpern -- phalpern@chnnb.com --
Collier, Halpern, Newberg & Nolletti LLP & Scott M. Salant –
ssalant@chnnb.com -- Collier Halpern & Newberg, LLP.


SERVICE WELDING: Clawson Tank Buying Personal Property for $15K
---------------------------------------------------------------
Service Welding & Machine Co., LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Kentucky to authorize the private sale
of personal property consisting of (i) its 33.3% ownership units in
Kleerwater Technologies, LLC; (ii) its customer list; (iii) design
and engineering information; (iv) computer equipment; (v) books and
records; (vi) literature; (vii) website and related digital assets;
(viii) telephone numbers; and (ix) and the name "Kleerwater
Technologies, LLC," to Clawson Tank Co. or its assigns for (i)
$5,000 in cash at closing, and (ii) payment of $10,000, payable in
installment payments from royalty proceeds received by the Buyer
from the Kleerwater, LLC until such time as the balance is paid in
full.

In May 2016, the Debtor ceased its manufacturing operations and
sold its equipment to a third party with whom it now contracts for
its manufacturing needs.  This change in its business model was
necessary to streamline its operations and to relocate to a new
property.

In July 2016, Debtor was forced to relocate from its downtown
location where the Debtor had operated for over 80 years.  It was
forced out by the prior owners of the company whom also own the
real estate where its principal place of business was located.
This sudden relocation caused a substantial business interruption
which resulted in lost revenue to the company for a period of six
months.  In addition, the Debtor could not quickly and easily
locate a facility that could house a company that was at the time
occupying an entire city block with additional storage of seven and
a half acres nearby.  The Debtor has been unable to recover from
these circumstances.

The Property was marketed for sale by word of mouth from the
Debtor.  It did not receive any other offers to purchase the
property.  Other than the Purchaser, no purchaser willing to
execute a definitive purchase agreement has emerged.

The Purchaser has performed and will continue to perform due
diligence regarding the purchase.  The parties have negotiated, in
good faith and at arms'-length, the terms of a definitive
agreement, embodied in the APA.  The APA contemplates a sale of the
Debtor's remaining assets to the Purchaser.

The Debtor believes the proposed sale is the best way to maximize
the value of its remaining assets and is in the best interest of
its estate and creditors.  The sale will be free and clear of all
interests.

A copy of the APA attached to the Motion is available for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/SERVICE_WELDING_178_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser:

          CLAWSON TANK CO.
          4545 Clawson Tank Drive
          Clarkston, MI 48347

               About Service Welding & Machine

Service Welding & Machine Company, LLC, based in Louisville,
Kentucky, sells and installs single and double wall storage tanks
for a variety of industries including petroleum, chemical,
distillery, potable water, industrial, and food/agriculture.
Service Tanks was established in 1928 and was primarily
manufacturing storage tanks and doing repair work.  In 2013, the
owners sold the business to Jeff Androla, president, and two other
investors.

Service Welding & Machine Company filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 17-30485) on Feb. 17, 2017.  The Hon.
Joan A. Lloyd presides over the case.  The Debtor disclosed
$516,432 in assets and $2.12 million in liabilities.  The petition
was signed by Jeff Androla, president.  Charity B. Neukomm, Esq.,
at Kaplan & Partners LLP, serves as bankruptcy counsel to the
Debtor.


SHAHRIAR ZARGAR: B. Shadsirat Suit Remanded to Superior Court
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Robert Kwan grants the plaintiff's motion to
remand the removed civil action captioned BEHROUZ SHADSIRAT,
Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL CASH, INC., a Nevada Corporation; JOSEPH
ZARGAR; MOHAMMAD KHAJEHMIRAKI; SHABNAM MESACHI; PAYMENT ALLIANCE
INTERNATIONAL, INC.; ELITE BANKCARD SOLUTIONS, LLC; BANK OF
AMERICA, N.A., DOES 1-20, Defendants, Adv. No. 2:18-ap-01148-RK
(Bankr. C.D. Cal.) to the Superior Court of California.

Plaintiff argues that Debtors Shahriar Joseph Zargar and Shabnam
Mesachi's removal of the Van Nuys State Court Action is nothing
more than a bad faith attempt to delay adjudication in state court.
Plaintiff contends that equity and fairness dictate that this court
remand the Van Nuys State Court Action to the Superior Court of
California.

In the judicial district, bankruptcy courts may consider up to 14
factors in deciding whether to remand an action to the
non-bankruptcy forum. These 14 equitable remand factors are:

1. The effect or lack thereof on the efficient administration of
the estate if a court recommends remand;
2. The extent to which state law issues predominate over bankruptcy
issues;
3. The difficulty or unsettled nature of the applicable law;
4. The presence of a related proceeding commenced in state court or
other non-bankruptcy court;
5. The jurisdictional basis, if any, other than 28 U.S.C. § 1334;
6. The degree of relatedness or remoteness of the proceeding to the
main bankruptcy case;
7. The substance rather than form of an asserted core proceeding;
8. The feasibility of severing state law claims from core
bankruptcy matters to allow judgments to be entered in state court
with enforcement left to the bankruptcy court;
9. The burden on the bankruptcy court's docket;
10. The likelihood that the commencement of the proceeding in
bankruptcy court involves forum shopping by one of the parties;
11. The existence of a right to a jury trial;
12. The presence in the proceeding of nondebtor parties;
13. Comity; and
14. The possibility of prejudice to other parties in the action.

After analyzing all these factors for equitable remand, the Court
finds that most of the factors favor remand.

The court has also considered the impact of Plaintiff's filing of a
proof of claim in Defendants' bankruptcy case and determines that
it does not have a substantial impact on its determination for
equitable remand. Although Plaintiff has submitted to bankruptcy
court's jurisdiction by filing the proof of claim, which is a core
matter, that the matter is core does not preclude discretionary
remand.  Because the court finds equitable grounds for
discretionary remand based in the analysis of the fourteen factors,
remand is appropriate, even if Plaintiff has filed a proof of claim
in this bankruptcy case, which is a core matter.

The court has also taken into consideration traditional policy
grounds upon which motions to remand are often granted including:
judicial economy; prompt, final resolution of disputes; respect for
state courts on issues of state law; and the expertise of the court
in which the matter was pending originally. Beyond the fourteen
factor equitable remand analysis, the court finds that traditional
policy grounds also warrant remand, as remand is more likely to
lead to a prompt, final resolution of the disputes while showing
respect for state courts on issues of state law.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision dated July 13,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2NzPHQo from Leagle.com.

Behrouz Shadsirat, Plaintiff, represented by Rosendo Gonzalez,
Gonzalez & Gonzalez Law, P.C.

Shahriar Joseph Zargar & Shabnam Mesachi, Defendants, represented
by Ashley M. McDow -- amcdow@foley.com -- Foley & Lardner LLP.

National Cash Inc, Mohammad Khajehmiraki & Davan Investment Corp,
Defendants, represented by Raymond H. Aver , Law Offices of Raymond
H. Aver A Professional Corporation.

National Cash, Inc., Defendant, represented by David B. Zolkin ,
Zolkin Talerico LLP.

Shahriar Joseph Zargar filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-11525) on Feb. 12, 2018, and is
represented by Ashley M. McDow, Esq. of Baker & Hostetler LLP.


SKY-SCAN INC: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral Through October 5
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Bruce A. Harwood of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Hampshire has authorized Sky-Skan Incorporated's
continued use of cash collateral through October 5, 2018.

The Debtor intends to use and expend up to $1,534,926 in cash
collateral to pay the costs and expenses incurred by the Debtor in
the ordinary course of business to the extent provided in the
Budget.

The Debtor alleges that as of the Petition Date its assets were
subject to the Internal Revenue Service's federal tax liens in the
amount and to the extent as set forth in the proof of claim filed
by the IRS.  

Coastal Capital, LLC has alleged it has a perfected lien against
all assets of the Debtor in the amount of $932,152.33, which
allegation the Debtor disputes.

The IRS and Costal are granted valid, binding, enforceable and
automatically perfected liens, which liens continue to be valid and
enforceable, on the Debtor's property acquired post-petition,
excluding so-called Chapter 5 Claims, which liens will attach only
to the same types of property and with the same validity, extent
and priority as to which their respective liens existed prior to
the Petition Date, notwithstanding the provisions of section 552 of
the Bankruptcy Code.

As further adequate protection:

      (a) The IRS is granted a continuing post-petition security
interest in all assets the Debtor.

      (b) The Internal Revenue Service, by and through its agents
or representatives, will have access to and the right to inspect
the Debtor's assets and properties during normal business hours.  

      (c) The Debtor will permit the Internal Revenue Service to
inspect, review and copy any financial records of the Debtor. These
records will be made available at the Debtor's place of business.

      (d) Since February 2018 the Debtor has been paying into
escrow at the Tamposi Law Group the monthly sum of $14,053.84.
Payments have been made and will continue to be made on the 15th
day of each month. Payments will continue each month thereafter
until confirmation of the Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan or until further
order of the Court. The funds will be applied to the secured debt
of the IRS and/or Coastal as their interests may ultimately be
adjudicated.

      (e) The Debtor will timely file all post-petition tax returns
on the due date with the appropriate IRS office. A copy of all tax
returns will be provided to the IRS within two business days of
submission by either (a) mailing the same to Gail Irving,
Bankruptcy Specialist, Internal Revenue Service, Insolvency Unit,
P.O. Box 9502, Portsmouth, NH 03802-9502, or by facsimile
transmission to the attention of Gail Irving at 855-876-3986.

      (f) The Debtor will timely pay each federal tax deposit as it
accrues (when payroll is made) by electronic transfer or through a
federal depository payable to the Debtor’s depository
institution.

      (g) The Debtor will maintain all insurance policies including
workers compensation, general liability, fire, and casualty.

      (h) The Debtor will provide to Coastal, the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors and the IRS a weekly report of its
current accounts receivable and cash positions as of Friday of
every week. The Debtor will provide such reports electronically on
each Wednesday for the previous week.

The Debtor will file a further application for ongoing usage of
Cash Collateral on or before September 10, 2018. Any objection to
the application for ongoing use of cash collateral will be filed on
or before September 26, 2018.

The Court will hold a hearing on the application for ongoing use of
Cash Collateral on October 3, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/nhb17-11540-279.pdf

                       About Sky-Skan Inc

Sky-Skan, Inc., was founded in 1967 as a company dedicated solely
to the development and manufacture of specialized devices for
depicting dynamic visualizations of astronomical and meteorological
phenomena on planetarium domes in museums, schools, and
universities.  The company has since grown to become a provider of
digital full dome science visualization, theater control, and show
programming systems for hundreds of planetariums on six continents,
serving hundreds of clients in the niche field of immersive science
interpretation and education.  From the initial planning stage to
staff training and ongoing support, Sky-Skan provides all services
required by the most advanced digital full-dome planetariums and
visualization theaters.

Sky-Skan, based in Nashua, NH, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D.N.H. Case No. 17-11540) on Nov. 1, 2017.  In the petition signed
by Steven T. Savage, president, the Debtor estimated $0 to $50,000
in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  

Peter N. Tamposi, Esq., at The Tamposi Law Group, P.C., serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor, and SquareTail Advisors, LLC, is
the financial advisor.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Dec. 1, 2017.  The Committee retained
William S. Gannon PLLC as its bankruptcy counsel.


SOAR INTO YOUR DESTINY: 3rd Interim Cash Collateral Order Entered
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Michael J. Kaplan of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of New York has entered a third interim order
authorizing Soar Into Your Destiny, Inc. to use, on an emergency
basis, the cash collateral with respect to the secured indebtedness
of US Income Partners, LLC.

The Debtor is authorized to use cash collateral for the payment of
(a) insurance, (b) utilities, (c) repairs and maintenance, and (d)
payment of postpetition interest on Debtor's obligation to US
Income Partners, all pending an interim and final hearing on the
Cash Collateral Motion.

The Debtor will provide US Income Partners, through counsel, copies
of all invoices for payments and copies of checks issued in payment
of the uses of cash collateral provided in the Interim Order.

A full-text copy of the Third Interim Order is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/nywb18-10659-47.pdf

                   About Soar Into Your Destiny

Soar Into Your Destiny, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-10659) on April
10, 2018.  In the petition signed by the Chairman of the Board,
Kale L. Mann, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of less
than $500,000.  Judge Michael J. Kaplan presides over the case.
Raymond C. Stilwell, Esq., at the Law Offices of Raymond C.
Stilwell, serves as the Debtor's counsel.


SOURCINGPARTNER INC: May Use Cash Collateral on Final Basis
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Brenda T. Rhoades of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Texas has entered a final order authorizing
Sourcingpartner, Inc. to use First United Bank & Trust Company's
cash collateral pending confirmation of a plan of reorganization or
further court order, pursuant to the agreed-to budget.

The Debtor requested, inter alia, for an order (i) authorizing
First United Bank & Trust Company to advance $36,787 for payment of
payroll and $10,888.75 and for payment to the Property Insurance
and General Liability Insurance, and (ii) authorizing the use of
its accounts receivables and proceeds to operate its business.

First United is granted, from and after the Petition Date,
replacement liens and security interests in all accounts,
inventory, equipment and General Intangibles acquired by the Debtor
after the Petition Date, in the same nature, extent, priority,
validity and amount that any such liens asserted by First United
existed on the Petition Date.  Such replacement liens will secure
an amount equal to the sum of the aggregate diminution, if any,
subsequent to the Petition Date, in the value of the claimed cash
collateral of First United.

The Debtor will permit representatives, agents, or employees of
First United to have reasonable access to its facilities and to
personnel employed at the Debtor, and will provide First United
with non-privileged information as it may reasonably request with
respect to such facilities and personnel.

In addition, the Debtor will pay First United the amount of $5,000
per month through confirmation of a plan of reorganization or
further court order to be credited against the post petition funds
advanced as set forth in the corrected Interim Order authorizing
the cash advance and use of cash collateral previously entered and
this order.

A full-text copy of the Final Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/txeb17-42777-71.pdf

                  About Sourcingpartner Inc.

Sourcingpartner, Inc., based in McKinney, Texas, is in the
stationery and office supplies industry.  It is a small business
debtor as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51D).

Sourcingpartner sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 17-42777) on Dec. 17,
2017.  In the petition signed by CEO Philip J. Leckinger, the
Debtor estimated assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million. Judge Brenda T. Rhoades presides over the
case.  The Harvey Law Firm, P.C., is the Debtor's legal counsel.


SPA 810: Committee Taps Tiffany & Bosco as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of SPA 810, LLC,
received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Arizona to hire Tiffany & Bosco, P.A. as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the committee regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; evaluate the value and appropriate disposition of
the Debtor's assets; assist in reviewing claims; evaluate any
proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization; and provide other legal
services related to the Debtor's Chapter 11 case.

The hourly rates range from $95 to $195 for the firm's legal
assistants and paralegals; $180 to $290 for associates and $295 to
$550 for partners.

Tiffany & Bosco is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Christopher R. Kaup, Esq.
     Evan Schube, Esq.
     Tiffany & Bosco, P.A.
     Seventh Floor, Camelback Esplanade II
     2525 East Camelback Road  
     Phoenix, AZ 85016

                 About SPA 810 and Phoenix Global
                        Consulting Services

SPA 810, LLC -- https://www.spa810.com -- owns and operates spas.
It is headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona, with locations in
Texas, Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Minnesota, Georgia, Oklahoma,
Colorado, and Kentucky.

SPA 810 and affiliate Phoenix Global Consulting Services sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz.
Case Nos. 18-06718 and 18-06719) on June 11, 2018.

At the time of the filing, SPA 810 estimated assets of less than
$500,000 and liabilities of less than $1 million to $10 million;
and Phoenix Global estimated less than $50,000 in assets and less
than $1 million in liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Dickinson Wright PLLC as their legal counsel.


SPRUHA SHAH: July 31 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois
will convene a hearing on July 31, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. to consider
approval of Spruha Shah, LLC, and Sneh & Sahil Enterprises, Inc.'s
disclosure statement to accompany its chapter 11 plan.

As previously reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, the
estimated allowed amount of the general unsecured claims under the
plan have been increased to $200,000 from $50,000.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb17-18858-85.pdf  

                      About Spruha Shah

Sneh and Sahil Enterprises, Inc. -- http://www.arlingtonrental.com/
-- does business under two assumed names, as follows: (a) Arlington
Rental, which rents out party equipment and supplies, like tents,
portable dance floors, tables chairs and other catering needs, and
(b) R Lederleitner Landscape, provides landscaping services.  It
operates from a commercial property owned by Spruha Shah.

Spruha Shah, LLC, a single asset real estate as defined in 11
U.S.C. Section 101(51B), is the owner of the real property commonly
known as 500 S. Hicks Rd., Palatine, Illinois.

Spruha Shah, LLC, and Sneh and Sahil Enterprises filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case Nos. 17-18858 and
17-18861) on June 22, 2017.  The petitions were signed by Sanjay
Shah, managing member.  The cases are jointly administered under
Spruha Shah's, with Judge Deborah L. Thorne presiding.

At the time of filing, the Debtors estimated assets and liabilities
ranging between $1 million to $10 million.

The Debtors are represented by Timothy C. Culbertson, Esq., at the
Law Offices of Timothy C. Culbertson.


STEPHEN D. MCCORMICK: Starion Entitled to $83K in Atty's Fees
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtors, the McCormicks, in the appeals case captioned Stephen D.
McCormick; Karen A. McCormick, Appellants, v. Starion Financial,
Appellee, No. 17-2192 (8th Cir.) appeal the ruling of the Eighth
Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirming the bankruptcy court's
order that Starion Financial was entitled to $83,122.95 in attorney
fees and costs incurred to collect on its secured debt in the
course of the McCormicks' bankruptcy proceedings. The United States
Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit affirms.

The Court reviews a decision of the BAP as a second reviewing court
under the same standard as the BAP-reviewing the bankruptcy court's
findings of fact for clear error and its conclusions of law de
novo. A secured creditor claiming entitlement to attorney fees and
costs in a bankruptcy proceeding pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section
506(b) must establish that it was oversecured and that an agreement
or state statute authorized the claim for attorney fees. Further
the fee must be reasonable. Finally, the claim must also involve an
allowed secured claim.

The crux of the dispute in this case is whether there is an
agreement providing for fees for the purposes of section 506(b), as
informed by the question of whether the two state court judgment
liens preclude such an agreement. The McCormicks argue that those
judgment liens arose "by operation of law" in state court as
opposed to being consensual, and as such, there is not an
"agreement," which forecloses the right to attorney fees under
section 506(b).

In the instant case there are many agreements in which the
McCormicks agreed to pay Starion's attorney fees. In addition to
the fee agreements in the original notes and mortgages, the Starion
Addendum to the bankruptcy plan is yet an another source of an
agreement entitling Starion to recover attorney fees. The Starion
Addendum was added to the bankruptcy plan well after the state
court judgment liens were entered in July 2012; indeed the
McCormicks had not even filed bankruptcy at the time the judgment
liens were entered. Thus, in addition to the agreements in the
notes, mortgages, and the Workout Agreement, an agreement in the
confirmed bankruptcy plan provided for the payment of attorney fees
incurred in conjunction with the bankruptcy proceeding.

The Court disagrees with any notion that the judgment liens are
somehow not part of Starion's secured claim. The judgment liens
came about because of the Workout Agreement wherein Starion agreed
to forebear on various other (secured) loan defaults in return for
the McCormicks' executing confessions of judgments and providing
additional collateral to Starion.

With regard to the timeliness of the fee request, the bankruptcy
court found that even though the request for fees was submitted
after the plan deadline, this was not a material breach of the plan
provisions.

The McCormicks contest this finding, arguing that the bankruptcy
court erroneously relied upon section 241 to determine whether the
breach was material. Instead, they argue, the court should have
focused on whether time was of the essence in requiring Starion to
submit the fee request by a date certain. Starion argues that
because the McCormicks have shown no prejudice from the late
submission and because time was not of the essence, their untimely
application for fees was as a result of excusable neglect. Starion
asserts that its counsel reasonably misinterpreted Federal Rule of
Bankruptcy Procedure 9006 relating to calculation of time, and that
it acted in good faith in submitting its request.

The Court finds no error in the bankruptcy court's finding (and the
BAP's agreement with the same) that the application for attorney
fees, while untimely, was not abusively so, and because no
prejudice to the debtors resulted, the fee application was properly
allowed.

A full-text copy of the Court's Decision dated July 3, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2uIQEPi from Leagle.com.

Joseph A. Turman, for Appellee.

Jon R. Brakke -- jbrakke@vogellaw.com -- for Appellant.

Caren W. Stanley -- cstanley@vogellaw.com -- for Appellant.

Katrina A. Turman Lang, for Appellee.

Timothy Dwight Lervick, for Appellee.

Stephen D. McCormick, also known as Steve D. McCormick, and Karen
A. McCormick filed a voluntary chapter 11 petition on August 29,
2012.


STEVE PATTERSON: To Pay Unsecured Creditors 50% of Allowed Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Patterson LLC and Valhalla Mining Co., LLC, filed a joint
small business disclosure statement to accompany their proposed
chapter 11 plan dated June 27, 2017.

Plan payments will be made over a period of 60 months with payments
to commence on the Plan effective date. Secured, priority and
administrative claimants will receive 100% payment of their allowed
claims; unsecured creditors will be paid 50% of their allowed
claims.

The Plan will be funded via Debtors' ongoing business operations.
Debtor Steve Patterson LLC has commenced work on a project which
will generate $80,000 gross in revenue per month going forward
which, in addition to Debtors' other gross income, will allow for
full plan funding.

A full-text copy of the Joint Disclosure Statement is available
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/pawb17-23523-79.pdf

              About Steve Patterson LLC

Steve Patterson LLC filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
W.D. Pa. Case No. 17-23520) on August 31, 2017, disclosing less
than $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is
represented by Robert O Lampl, Esq., as its bankruptcy counsel.


STOLLINGS TRUCKING: Sept. 12 Amended Plan Outline Hearing
---------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Frank W. Volk is set to hold a hearing on Sept.
12, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. to consider and act upon approval of
Stollings Trucking Company, Inc.'s amended disclosure statement in
support of its amended plan dated June 14, 2018.

August 31, 2018 is set as the last day to file and serve any
written objection to the proposed Amended Disclosure Statement.

As previously reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, unsecured
creditors will get $500,000 under the amended plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/wvsb15-20624-597.pdf

                    About Stollings Trucking

Stollings Trucking Company, Inc., began its operations in 1990.
Throughout the years, it both hauled coal and mined coal for its
own profit.  As it grew, it acquired more equipment and rolling
stock.  Stollings also obtained mining permits on property in Logan
County, West Virginia, and was a party to coal leases.

Stollings Trucking sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Case No. 15-20624) on Dec. 7,
2015.  In the petition signed by Rhonda Marcum, president, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.

Judge Frank W. Volk presides over the case.

Joseph W. Caaldwell, Esq., at Caldwell & Riffee, in Charleston, WV,
is serving as counsel to the Debtor.


SUNBURST FARMS: Court Denies Bid for Chapter 11 Trustee
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert E. Nugent of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Kansas has denied the request of Samuel K. Crocker,
U.S. Trustee for the District of Kansas, to dismiss or, in the
alternative, to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee in the case of
Sunburst Farms Partnership.

As previously reported by The Troubled Company Reporter, the U.S.
Trustee contends that Sunburst Farms is managed by its general
partner Western Plains Funds, Inc., whose president is Carol
Bloesser. No one other than Bloesser purports to have a managing
role with Sunburst Farms. The partnership's primary assets comprise
about $3.8 million in crops, machinery, and equipment.

The U.S. Trustee relates that at the meeting of creditors, Bloesser
testified that Sunburst Farms had no plan to reorganize but instead
would pursue liquidation by selling all of its assets at auction.
She emphasized that her intention was "that all creditors be paid
in full."

The U.S. Trustee further relates that an auction of farm equipment
did take place on December 13, 2017. But rather than selling all of
its equipment, Sunburst Farms put up only 33 pieces of equipment --
less than a third of what it owns. Those 33 items sold for a total
of $1,084,250. The lion's share of that sum, about $700,000,
represented bids from two individuals: (a) Lance Steele, son of
Larry Steele, Sunburst's farm operator and Bloesser's personal
friend, who also provided the referral for the auctioneer that
Sunburst employed; and (b) Kelley Morris, an auto mechanic from
Colorado who is an acquaintance of Larry Steele.

The U.S. Trustee asserts, however, that neither Kelley Morris nor
Lance Steele -- who for years has already been indebted to Sunburst
Farms for personal loans that Bloesser has extended indefinitely --
have paid for their putative purchases. Despite inquiries from the
auctioneer and Sunburst Farms' own attorneys, Bloesser has neither
opened up sales to the second-highest bidders nor attempted to sell
the unlisted items. In the meantime, a substantial amount of
harvested wheat sits in storage.

Moreover, the U.S. Trustee notes that at her Rule 2004 examination
on February 21, 2018, Bloesser testified that she has no intention
of auctioning the other equipment because she is hoping for funds
and will use the rest of the machinery for collateral.

Thus, the U.S. Trustee asserts that by abandoning its intent to
liquidate all of its equipment and crops, Sunburst Farms failed to
honor its fiduciary duties and its representations to creditors and
to the Court demonstrate cause to dismiss the case entirely. In the
alternative, the U.S. Trustee requests that the Court authorize the
appointment of a trustee to ameliorate the damage caused by the
debtor-in-possession's mismanagement and to preserve the interests
of creditors and the estate.

                      About Sunburst Farms

Sunburst Farms Partnership is engaged in wheat and feed sorghum
production.  The principal place of business of Sunburst Farms is
116 W Greeley, Tribune, Kansas 67879.

Sunburst Farms filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D. Kan. Case No. 17-11389) on July 19, 2017, disclosing $4.29
million in total assets and $6.60 million in total liabilities.
The petition was signed by Carol Bloesser, president of Western
Plains, the Debtor's general partner.

Judge Robert E. Nugent presides over the case.

David P. Eron, Esq., at Eron Law, P.A., serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel. K.Coe Isom, LLC, is the Debtor's accountant.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of Sunburst Farms Partnership.  The Committee
retained Arst & Arst, PA as counsel.


SUPERIOR BOILER: Selling Bell Gardens Property for $1.4 Million
---------------------------------------------------------------
Superior Boiler Repair, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of California to authorize the sale of the
real property located at 8204 Garfield Avenue, Bell Gardens,
California to R. F. Holdings, LLC for $1,365,000, subject to
overbid.

The Debtor is the owner of the subject property.  The subject
property is the location at which the Debtor carried on its
business.  However, shortly prior to the filing of the within
Chapter 11 petition, the Debtor ceased all business operations and
has not conducted business thereat since the filing.

The subject property is encumbered by the following liens: Note
secured by deed of trust in favor of Opus Bank - $1,170,030.  If
the Motion is granted, the subject property will be sold, liens
will be paid off in full and the Debtor will file its Disclosure
Statement and Plan of Reorganization.  In addition to approval of
the sale, the Debtor asks approval for the payment of real estate
commissions and costs incurred in connection therewith.  

The subject property will be sold and the obligations secured
against it will be paid in full.  The subject property will be sold
with a pay-off of the liens and encumbrances by the sellers through
escrow with the proceeds of the sale.  To the best of the Debtor's
knowledge and belief, the sale will generate a capital gain of less
than $100,000 which would require the payment of a capital gains
tax of approximately $15,000, or less.

The Debtor asks Court approval to sell the subject property to the
Purchaser for a purchase price of $1,365,000.  

The principle terms of the sale are:

     1. Purchaser: R. F. Holdings, LLC

     2. Purchase price: $1,365,000

     3. Escrow agent: Everest Escrow

     4. Escrow officer: Jennifer Stipe

     5. Real estate commission: Realty One Group/Jeremie Tavisol

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Superior_Boiler_48_Sales.pdf

The sale is subject to overbid, as follows: The initial overbid
must be in an amount at least 5% more than the current sale price.
The overbidder must appear at the hearing and provide proof of
availability of funds to the satisfaction of the Court.
Thereafter, the overbidder must deposit those funds in escrow
within five days after the hearing.  If an overbid is approved and
accepted and, thereafter, the overbidder is either unable or
unwilling to complete the sale, the property will then be sold to
the next highest bidder, whether that be another overbidder or the
original offeror.

A hearing on the Motion is set for July 18, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

The granting of the Debtor's motion is in the best interest of the
creditors of the estate and the Debtor.

The Debtor asks waiver of the 10-day stay of the order approving
the sale of the subject property pursuant to Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure, Section 6004(g).

                  About Superior Boiler Repair

Superior Boiler Repair Inc. is a privately-held company that
provides building boilers repair services.  Its products include
boilers, burners, feed water tanks, industrial water heaters and
pumps.  The company was founded in 1979 and is headquartered in
Bell Gardens, California.

Superior Boiler Repair sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-13505) on March 29,
2018.  In the petition signed by Omar Gamarra, president, the
Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Sandra R. Klein
presides over the case.  The Debtor hired Oaktree Law as its legal
counsel.


SUPERIOR ENERGY: Moody's Hikes CFR to B1 & Sr. Unsec. Notes to B2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded SESI, L.L.C.'s (SESI or Superior
Energy) Corporate Family Rating (CFR) to B1 from B2, Probability of
Default Rating (PDR) to B1-PD from B2-PD, senior unsecured notes to
B2 from B3, and Speculative Grade Liquidity (SGL) rating to SGL-2
from SGL-3. The rating outlook remains stable.

"The upgrade reflects SESI's improving earnings and cash flow and
our expectation that leverage will move towards 4x from very high
2017 levels as equipment utilization and pricing increases steadily
through 2019," said Sajjad Alam, Moody's Senior Analyst."

Issuer: SESI, L.L.C..

Upgraded:

Corporate Family Rating, Upgraded to B1 from B2

Probability of Default Rating, Upgraded to B1-PD from B2-PD

Senior Unsecured Notes, Upgraded to B2 (LGD4) from B3 (LGD4)

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Upgraded to SGL-2 from SGL-3

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Maintain Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Superior Energy's B1 CFR reflects its improving earnings, declining
financial leverage from a very high level, and more supportive
industry fundamentals following an extended period of very weak
demand and pricing conditions. Although Moody's expects very
competitive operating environment through mid-2019, SESI should be
able to push earnings higher by leveraging its sizeable completion
and premium drill pipe rentals businesses, which have seen good
sequential demand growth and have further margin expansion
potentials in the growing US land markets. If oil price remains
elevated near the top end of Moody's $45-$65/bbl price range, SESI
could strengthen its balance sheet considerably from current
levels. SESI improved its maturity profile in the second half of
2017 after refinancing its 2019 notes and converting its revolver
to a five-year ABL facility. SESI's ratings are primarily supported
by its significant scale and diversification across key US basins,
meaningful international and offshore presence, broad array of
product and service offerings, and track record of disciplined
capital allocation.

SESI's $1.3 billion senior unsecured notes are rated B2, one notch
below the B1 Corporate Family Rating (CFR) given their subordinated
claim to the company's assets behind the $300 million senior
secured ABL facility in accordance with Moody's Loss Given Default
methodology.

The SGL-2 rating reflects good liquidity, which is supported by
SESI's $119 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and
an undrawn ABL revolving credit facility that had $225 million in
available capacity as of June 30, 2018, after accounting for $38
million of outstanding letters of credit. Moody's expects SESI to
generate free cash flow in the second half of 2018 after
outspending in the first half of the year, and spend roughly $225
million of capital during all of 2018. The company should produce
significantly more free cash flow in 2019 and build cash on a
slightly higher capex budget. SESI has not used its revolver
historically and Moody's doesn't anticipate any drawings through
2019 absent a dramatic collapse in oilfield activity. The borrowing
base was $263 million at the end of the second quarter and will
fluctuate based on changes in the book value of accounts
receivable, inventory and premium drill pipes. The ABL facility
matures in October 2022 and Moody's doesn't anticipate SESI to face
any covenant restrictions in accessing the facility through 2019.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation of SESI's free cash
flow generation and improving industry conditions through 2019. If
SESI can comfortably sustain leverage below 4x and consistently
generate free cash flow in a stable to improving industry
environment, an upgrade could be considered. A downgrade is most
likely if leverage remains elevated above 5x or liquidity becomes
weak.

SESI, L.L.C. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Superior Energy
Services, Inc., which is a publicly traded diversified oilfield
services company headquartered in Houston, Texas.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global Oilfield
Services Industry Rating Methodology published in May 2017.



SUPERIOR HOME: PCO Files 2nd Report
-----------------------------------
Dr. Thomas A. Mackey, Patient Care Ombudsman to Superior Home
Health of San Antonio, LLC, files the following evaluation report
to the Bankruptcy Court on the quality and safety of patient care.

   1. Patient care by the Debtor continues to be delivered in a
manner equal to/better than what was delivered prior to filing
Chapter 11. There is no apparent decrease in quality, safety or
types of services from what existed prior to the filing. Likewise,
staff members are still operationalizing patient safety and quality
of care programs equal to/better than filing Chapter 11.

   2. The Debtor's licenses from the Texas Department of Aging and
Disability Services (DADS) for all Facilities are still current.
One of the Debtor's Facility license expires next month so a visit
by DADS will occur between now and the next PCO visit.

   3. While the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Quality of Patient Care Star Ratings are still below the State and
national averages, the Debtor is making organizational changes to
correct the issue.

   4. Some of the PCO recommendations to further improve quality
and safety of care from the previous visit have been implemented
while others are still a ‘work in progress’.  

In general, systems and personnel are in place to continue to
provide quality safe care to patients of the Facilities. The PCO
believes the Facilities are currently providing quality safe care
with the exception of the areas mentioned above. The Facility has
made plans of correction in response to DADS’ findings since
March 2018. Currently, the PCO is  satisfied with corrective
actions on those issues and believes the infrastructure now in
place provides a permanent solution for continued delivery of safe
quality care.   

The PCO recommends the following:

   1. Develop a new tuberculosis screening policy. If outside
assistance is needed from an expert then pursue a consultation.  

   2. If the above quality and safety issues are being addressed in
staff meetings then start documenting the coverage. If issues are
not being addressed then develop a plan to start to address the
issues and document appropriately.

   3. Provide avenues/opportunities for the Region Director of
Clinical Services to obtain formal training in such areas as
infection control, patient safety issues, and quality assessment
and process improvement.

A full-text copy of the PCO's Second Report is available for free
at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb18-50600-82.pdf

                     About Superior Home

Superior Home Health -- http://superiorforyou.com-- is a provider
of home health and hospice care services with locations in Texas
and Nevada.  The Debtors are affiliates of Big Guns Petroleum,
Inc., which sought bankruptcy protection on March 13, 2018 (Bankr.
W.D. Tex. Case No. 18-50569).

Superior Home Health Services, LLC, and five affiliates filed
voluntary Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 18-50597)
on March 16, 2018.  The case is assigned to Judge Ronald B. King.
The Debtors are represented by Ronald J. Smeberg, Esq., at The
Smeberg Law Firm, PLLC, in San Antonio, Texas.

At the time of filing, the Debtors had estimated assets of $100,000
to $500,000 and estimated liabilities of $500,000 to $1 million.
The petition was signed by Belinda Juarez, president.

Dr. Thomas A. Mackey was appointed as the Patient Care Ombudsman
(PCO) for Superior Home Health of San Antonio, LLC.


SUZANNE ALESHIRE: Dist. Court Affirms Dismissal of Ch. 11 Petition
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned SUZANNE ALESHIRE, Debtor-Appellant,
v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Creditor-Appellee, No. 17 CV 617 (N.D.
Ill.), District Judge John J. Tharp affirmed the bankruptcy court
order's dismissing Debtor Suzanne Aleshire's Chapter 11 petition
without a confirmed reorganization plan.

The issue presented by the appeal is whether the bankruptcy judge
abused her discretion in dismissing Aleshire's chapter 11 petition.
Section 1112(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. section
1112(b)(1)) provides that a chapter 11 petition should be denied
(or converted to a chapter 7 proceeding) upon a showing of "cause."
Here, the bankruptcy court identified two bases to dismiss
Aleshire's petition for cause: Aleshire's inability to pay
post-petition taxes on the properties in her estate and her
inadequate income to fund a plan that included retention of all of
the properties in her estate. Either of these reasons independently
justified the dismissal of Aleshire's petition (which had been
pending for more than two years when the bankruptcy judge dismissed
it); in combination, the argument that the bankruptcy judge abused
her discretion borders on the frivolous.

Aleshire does not dispute that, when the court dismissed her
petition, she owed Wells Fargo approximately $90,000 in
post-petition real estate taxes that the bank had paid to prevent
tax liens on the properties. Section 1112(b)(4)(I) of the
Bankruptcy Code specifically provides that the failure to pay
post-petition taxes is cause for dismissal of a chapter 11 petition
and certainly the bankruptcy judge did not abuse her discretion in
dismissing the petition when it is undisputed both that Aleshire
owed the amount of the tax payments to Wells Fargo and that she did
not have the resources to pay that obligation in full upon
confirmation of the plan. There was, therefore, cause for a
dismissal on this basis and no abuse of discretion in dismissing
the petition on this basis.

Aleshire also argues that the bankruptcy judge employed the wrong
standard in assessing her ability to fund a confirmable plan, in
that she looked for a "guarantee" that Aleshire would have the
resources to fund the plan. That is simply untrue. Rather, Judge
Doyle found that Aleshire had a demonstrated inability to fund the
plan over the two years her petition was pending and that there was
virtually no basis on which to conclude that her ability to fund a
plan had suddenly improved materially--particularly in light of her
obligation to pay more than $90,000 in post-petition tax payments
on top of funding her mortgage obligations. It was, in Judge
Doyle's view, "utterly impossible" for Aleshire to fund a
confirmable plan. Plainly, then, she did not hold Aleshire to the
wrong standard of certainty; she granted Wells Fargo's motion to
dismiss not because she was uncertain whether Aleshire could
confirm a plan but because she was certain that Aleshire could
not.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated July 9,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2LvePdB from Leagle.com.

Suzanne Mulder Aleshire, Appellant, pro se.

Wells Fargo Bank NA, Appellee, represented by Andrew John Hawes --
Andrew.Hawes@mccalla.com -- McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC &
Elisabeth Anne Mohr – Elisabeth.mohr@mccalla.com -- McCalla
Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC.

Patrick S Layng, Appellee, represented by Cameron M. Gulden, U.S.
Department of Justice Office of the United States Trustee.

Suzanne Mulder Aleshire sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D.
Ill. Case No. 15-01652) on Jan. 19, 2015.


TINTRI INC: L. Tuller Suit Stayed Pending Resolution of Ch. 11 Case
-------------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers stayed the case captioned
LANCE TULLER, Plaintiff, v. TINTRI, INC., ET AL., Defendants, Case
No. 17-cv-05714-YGR (N.D. Cal.) pending resolution of Tintri,
Inc.'s chapter 11 bankruptcy.

The Court now sets the matter for a status hearing at 9:01 a.m. on
Friday, April 12, 2019. Five business days prior to the date of the
Status Hearing, plaintiffs must file a statement informing the
Court of the status of the bankruptcy proceedings.

A copy of the Court's Order dated July 12, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2LDDRE9 from Leagle.com.

Lance Tuller, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, represented by Laurence M. Rosen, The Rosen
Law Firm, P.A.

Tintri, Inc., Ken Klein, Ian Halifax & Kieran Harty, Defendants,
represented by Benjamin Matthew Crosson -- bcrosson@wsgr.com Wilson
Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Caz Hashemi -- chasehmie@wsgr.com --
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati & Doru Gavril -- dgavril@wsgr.com
-- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati.

Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Inc., Pacific Crest Securities, Needham & Co., LLC, Piper Jaffray &
Co., Raymond James & Associates, Inc. & William Blair & Co.,
L.L.C., Defendants, represented by Jonathan Rosenberg --
jrosenberg@omm.com -- O'Melveny & Myers LLP & Matthew William Close
-- mclose@omm.com O'Melveny & Myers LLP.

Rustam Mustafin, Movant, represented by Shimon Yiftach, Bronstein
Gewirtz & Grossman.

Fattorini and Dail, Movant, represented by Laurence M. Rosen, The
Rosen Law Firm, P.A.

Henrik Thorring, Movant, represented by Kara M. Wolke, Glancy
Prongay & Murray LLP & Robert Vincent Prongay, Glancy Prongay &
Murray LLP.

                     About Tintri Inc.

Tintri, Inc. -- www.tintri.com -- is an enterprise cloud storage
company founded in 2008 with the initial objective to solve the
mismatch caused by using old, conventional physical storage systems
with applications in virtual machine environments.  The company
provides large organizations and cloud service providers with an
enterprise cloud platform that offers public cloud capabilities
inside their own data centers and that can also connect to public
cloud services.  Tintri is headquartered at 303 Ravendale Drive,
Mountain View, California 94043.  The company has additional
locations in McLean, Virginia; Chicago, Illinois, London, England;
Munich, Germany; Singapore; and Tokyo, Japan.

Tintri Inc. filed for bankruptcy on July 10, 2018 (Bankr. D. Del.,
Case No. 18-11625). Kieran Harty, co-founder and chief technology
officer, filed the petition.  Hon. Kevin J. Carey presides over the
case.

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP serves the Debtors' counsel.
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati is the Debtor's special corporate
counsel. Houlihan Lokey acts as the Debtor's financial advisor and
Kurtzman Carson Consultants Inc. as the Debtor's claims and
noticing agent.  

At January 2018, the Debtor had total assets of $76.25 million and
total debts of $168 million.


TITAN INTERNATIONAL: S&P Alters Outlook to Pos. & Affirms 'B-' ICR
------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 25, 2018, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B-' issuer
credit rating on Titan International Inc. and revised the rating
outlook to positive from negative.

S&P said, "At the same time, we affirmed our 'B-' rating on the
company's $400 million senior secured notes. The '3' recovery
rating is unchanged, indicating our expectation for meaningful
(50%-70%; rounded estimate: 50%) recovery in the event of a
default.

The affirmation and outlook revision to positive reflects Titan's
improved debt leverage, stemming from strengthening end markets and
resulting EBITDA growth. The company's key agricultural,
construction, and mining markets began to recover in 2017 and S&P
expects will continue to improve in 2018. The improvement in
agricultural markets stems largely from equipment replacement
demand in North America despite persistently low crop prices.
Conversely, improving commodity prices in the mining markets are
driving higher customer capital expenditures. Also, nonresidential
and residential construction activity is on the rise amid
relatively favorable macroeconomic conditions worldwide. S&P
believes these factors will contribute to improved volumes for
Titan in 2018, and drive incremental profit growth on increasing
manufacturing capacity utilization and continuous improvement
initiatives.

The positive outlook on Titan reflects S&P Global Ratings'
expectation that the company will reduce its debt leverage to below
6x over the next 12 months as continued volume growth in its
agricultural and construction markets, coupled with cost reduction
initiatives, leads to improvement in operating performance. S&P
also expects the company to maintain its adequate liquidity.
Notwithstanding these expectations, the potential impact of tariffs
by China on U.S. goods poses a risk to S&P's forecast.

S&P sai, "We could raise our ratings on Titan over the next 12
months if the company's operating performance continues to improve,
causing its debt-to-EBITDA metric to decline and remain below 6.5x.
We would also like to have greater certainty that the potential
impact of tariffs will not materially erode the company's credit
measures or liquidity.

"We could revise our outlook on Titan to stable if the company is
not able to grow its earnings over the next 12 months and debt
leverage increases and remains well above 6.5x. This could occur,
for instance, if retaliatory tariffs from China on U.S.
agricultural products weaken demand for agricultural equipment or
if substantial raw material price inflation pressures the company's
profitability."



TOMMIE LINGENFELTER: Selling New Smyrna Beach Condo Unit for $250K
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tommie J. Lingenfelter and Judith R. Lingenfelter ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Georgia to authorize
their sale of interest in Unit #203, Southwind Condominium, 5499 S.
Atlantic Avenue, New Smyrna Beach, Florida to Kevin and Elaine
McKain for $250,000.

These entities assert claim against the Property:

     a. JPMCC 2002-CIBC4 Thomaston Retail, Limited Partnership, c/o
LNR Partners, LLC, 1601 Washington Avenue, Suite 800, Miami Beach,
Florida, claims an interest in the Property by virtue of a judgment
dated Aug. 21, 2015, entered by the Superior Court of Houston
County, Georgia in the original amount of $1,494,160, and recorded
in the records of the Circuit Court of Volusia County, Florida on
Dec. 29, 2015.  The Volusia County Judgment was recorded at Book
7200, Page 4300, Circuit Court of Volusia County.  On Sept. 22,
2017, the Debtors' filed the adversary proceeding, Tommie and
Judith Lingenfelter v. JPMCC 2002-CIBC4 Thomaston Retail, Limited
Partnership, Case No. 17-05047, seeking a determination of the
extent, validity, and priority of the Volusia County Judgment.
That Adversary Proceeding is currently pending.

     b. The Southwind Condominium Association, Inc., 5499 S.
Atlantic Avenue, #100, New Smyrna Beach, Florida, is represented by
Dorough & Dorough, LLC c/o Benjamin Ost at 160 Clairemont Avenue,
Suite 650, Decatur, Georgia.

     c. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, 3415 Vision
Drive, Columbus, Ohio is represented by McCalla Raymer Leibert
Pierce, LLC c/o Michelle Hart Ippoliti, 1544 Old Alabama Road,
Roswell Georgia.

On May 23, 2018, the Debtors entered into the Purchase and Sale
Agreement with the McKains relating to the purchase and sale of the
Property.  In pertinent part, the Contract provides that the
Debtors will sell the Property to the McKains for a purchase price
of $250,000.  The closing date is set for the later of (i) July 6,
2018 or (ii) Court approval of the sale.

The McKain Contract calls for $1,000 in earnest money, which is
currently held in the trust account of Watson Realty Corp.  The
brokerage fee, if any, due to the Broker is payable out of the
purchase price pursuant to an Exclusive Seller Listing Agreement
dated on Nov. 14, 2017 between the Debtors and Broker and estimated
to be $15,195.  The Listing Agreement and retention of the Broker
was previously approved by order of the Court dated Dec. 29, 2017.

The sale will be free and clear of liens, claims, and interests,
with such liens, claims, and interests, if any, to attach to the
net proceeds of such sale.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Tommie_Lingenfelter_80_Saes.pdf

The Debtors ask the Court to authorizing the disbursal of the
proceeds of the sale as follows:

     i. pay liens for unpaid ad valorem taxes assessed against the
Property through the closing of the sale;

    ii. pay all usual, customary, and reasonable costs associated
with the sale as agreed in the Contract and the Listing Agreement;

   iii. pay to JP Morgan at closing the net proceeds necessary to
satisfy the JP Morgan indebtedness; and

    iv. pay to Debtors, care of Debtors’ undersigned attorneys at
the closing, the net proceeds allocated to the Debtors' interest in
the Property, with such proceeds to be held in trust in a separate
interest-bearing DIP account to be opened at Wells Fargo Bank,
Macon, Georgia in the name of Tommie and Judith Lingenfelter, DIP
(or such other separate account arrangement reached between the
Debtors' counsel and the United States Trustee) pending the outcome
of the Adversary Proceeding, pending the resolution of any claim of
Southwind against the Property, pending the resolution of any other
disputes regarding the net proceeds, and for distribution to
creditors pursuant to an order of this Court or the terms of a
confirmed plan.

They further ask the Court to determine the value of the Property
being sold securing the liens, and authorize the compensation of
Watson Realty, their real estate broker.

The Debtors believe that time is of the essence in closing the
transactions by the contemplated Closing Date.  Therefore, they ask
that the Court waives the 14-day stay of any order approving the
Motion pursuant to F.R.B.P. 6004(h) and 6006(d).

Tommie J. Lingenfelter and Judith R. Lingenfelter sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 17-51934) on Sept. 5, 2017.  
The Debtors tapped David L. Bury, Jr., Esq., at Stone & Baxter,
LLP, as counsel.



TXP CORP: Richard ISD Wins Lawsuit vs Asymblix
----------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned ASYMBLIX LLC D/B/A IPHOTONIX,
Appellant, v. RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, CITY OF
RICHARDSON, AND DALLAS COUNTY, Appellees, No. 05-18-00433-CV (Tex.
App.), the Court of Appeals of Texas affirmed the trial court's
judgment in favor of Appellee Richardson Independent School
District and denied Asymblix LLC d/b/a IPhotonix's motion for new
trial.

Appellee RISD filed a lawsuit against appellant Asymblix to collect
delinquent ad valorem taxes allegedly owed by Asymblix on business
personal property. Further, the City of Richardson and Dallas
County (the "intervenors") intervened to collect taxes they
contended Asymblix owed to them on the same property. Following a
bench trial, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of RISD and
the intervenors and denied Asymblix's motion for new trial.

On appeal, Asymblix asserts in two issues (1) the evidence is
legally and factually insufficient to support the trial court's
judgment and (2) the trial court abused its discretion by denying
Asymblix's motion for new trial. We decide against Asymblix on its
two issues.

In June 2009, TXP Corporation a/k/a/ Texas Prototypes, Inc.
commenced a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding in federal bankruptcy
court. At the time of that bankruptcy filing, appellees were owed
ad valorem taxes accrued against certain business personal property
of TXP Corporation for the years 2008 and 2009. The bankruptcy
court signed a March 23, 2010 "final order" (the "Sale Order") in
which it authorized the sale of the property to an entity that
subsequently became Asymblix.1 The sale closed on approximately
March 30, 2010. Several weeks later, upon motion by TXP
Corporation, the bankruptcy court signed an order dismissing the
Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding.

On August 8, 2012, RISD filed the lawsuit against Asymblix. In its
petition, RISD sought delinquent ad valorem taxes on the property
for 2008, 2009, and 2010, plus penalties, interest, attorney's
fees, and costs. The petition stated in part "[s]aid Defendant(s)
currently own(s) or claims(s) an interest in the property
hereinafter described and/or owned the hereinafter described
property on the first day of January of each of the years for which
taxes are due and owing."

n its first issue, Asymblix contends the trial court's judgment
"should be overturned on factual and legal sufficiency grounds."

In this case, Asymblix does not contend, and the record does not
show, that the Sale Order or letter ruling were "void." Therefore,
any collateral attack is improper. The bankruptcy court's letter
ruling "concluded that the Taxing Authorities' liens survived" the
sale of the property. The record shows Asymblix's argument on
appeal that it purchased the property clear of all liens, debts,
and encumbrances "necessarily calls into question certain legal
implications" of the Sale Order, which implications were addressed
by the bankruptcy court in the letter ruling. Therefore, the Court
concludes that argument constitutes an impermissible collateral
attack. Accordingly, rather than allowing such an attack, the Court
gives finality to the bankruptcy court's ruling that the tax liens
in question encumbered the property after the sale.  On this
record, the Court concludes the evidence is legally and factually
sufficient to support Asymblix's liability for the amounts in
question. The Court decides against Asymblix on its first issue.

In its second issue, Asymblix contends the trial court's denial of
its motion for new trial constituted an abuse of discretion.
Specifically, Asymblix asserts (1) it "rebutted the taxing
authorities' presumption of prima facie evidence of taxes due"; (2)
"[t]here is insufficient evidence to show the validity of the
interest, penalties and fees assessed"; (3) "[d]amages were
manifestly too high"; and (4) "there was conflicting evidence on
market value creating a fact issue."

Based on the Court's conclusion on the first issue, the trial court
did not abuse its discretion by denying Asymblix's motion for new
trial on any of those three grounds. The Court decides against
Asymblix on its second issue.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated July 3,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2LuNBnv from Leagle.com.

Eric D. Fein, Vickie S. Brandt, for Asymblix, LLC d/b/a Iphotonix,
Appellant.

Edward Lopez, Jr., for City of Richardson and Dallas County,
Appellee.

Elizabeth Banda Calvo, Elena N. Fernandez, R. Bruce Medley, for
Richardson Independent School District, Appellee.

Based in Richardson, Texas, TXP Corporation filed for chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 09-43659)on June
19, 2009, with total assets of $3,640,000 and total liabilities of
$16,800,000. The petition was signed by Michael Shores, president
of the Company.


VENTURE INVESTMENTS: Wants Immediate OK on Cash Collateral Use
--------------------------------------------------------------
Venture Investments Group, Inc., doing business as Burton's Total
Pet, seeks immediate approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Pennsylvania to use cash collateral in
order to continue to operate its business.

The Debtor lists these creditors whom it believes could possibly
have an interest in cash collateral as Respondents: (a) LG Funding;
(b) Bradley Caldwell, Inc.; (c) Yellowstone Capital, LLC; (d)
Independence Bank. But the Debtor is in no way making an averment
that each of the Respondents is fully or partially secured in the
cash collateral of the Debtor.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/pawb18-22561-5.pdf

                 About Venture Investments Group

Venture Investments Group, Inc., which conducts business under the
name Burton's Total Pet, is a provider of pet care, pet information
and pet supplies serving the Pittsburgh areas since 1993.  It
provides VIP pet care community veterinary clinics, self-service
dog wash and bed and breakfast boarding.

Venture Investments Group sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 18-22561) on June 26,
2018.  In the petition signed by Burton Patrick, president, the
Debtor estimated assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  The Debtor tapped Christopher M. Frye,
Esquire and Steidl and Steinberg, P.C., as bankruptcy counsel.



VERIFONE SYSTEMS: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B', Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on San Jose,
Calif.-based VeriFone Systems Inc. to 'B' from 'BB'. The outlook is
stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned our 'B' issue-level rating
and '3' recovery rating to the company's planned first-lien credit
facility, comprising a $250 million revolving credit facility due
2023 and $1.65 billion term loan due 2025. The '3' recovery rating
reflects our expectation of meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate:
60%) recovery in the event of a payment default.  

"We also assigned our 'B-' issue-level rating and '5' recovery
rating to the company's planned $300 million second-lien credit
facility due 2026. The '5' recovery rating reflects our expectation
of modest (10%-30%; rounded estimate: 20%) recovery in the event of
a payment default.

"We will withdraw our 'BB' issue-level rating and '3' recovery
rating on VeriFone Inc.'s existing first-lien credit facility at
transaction close. We will also withdraw our issuer credit rating
on Verifone, Inc. at transaction close.

"Our downgrade reflects the substantially increased debt to fund
the leveraged buyout (LBO) resulting in initial leverage in the
mid-7x debt to EBITDA, excluding the company's cost-cut
considerations over the next several years, from the low-3x area as
of April 30, 2018. VeriFone plans to raise $2 billion of new debt
to fund the transaction and repay all existing debt.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that despite initial
high leverage at close, cost cuts will contribute to significant
deleveraging to the 5x area by end of 2020. We expect revenue
growth to be in the flat to low-single percentages, but the
cost-saving initiatives to result in EBITDA margin improvement to
the low-20% range. We also expect annual free operating cash flow
to improve to the $100 million range in 2020 from the $50 million
range in 2019 from cost-saving implementation and associated ramp
down in restructuring spend, resulting in mid-single-digit
percentage range of debt beyond 2020.  

"We could lower the rating if the cost-saving strategy is much more
costly or takes longer to implement than currently expected,
resulting in leverage sustained above 7x. We could also lower the
rating if competition intensifies leading to multiple periods of
revenue declines, indicating a weakening market position.

"We view an upgrade as unlikely over the next 12 months given high
leverage and a comprehensive multiyear restructuring plan. We could
raise the rating beyond the 12-month horizon, if leverage were to
decline to and remain below 5x. This can be achieved by greater
revenue stability and diversification, with a higher percentage of
reoccurring services related revenue, and consistent organic
growth."  



VERN'S AUTO: Plan Outline Approved; August 8 Plan Hearing
---------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Ronald B. King issued an order approving Vern's
Auto Repair, LLC's first amended disclosure statement describing
its proposed chapter 11 plan.

The Confirmation Hearing on the Debtor's plan is set for August 8,
2018 at 9:30 a.m.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that the secured
claim of FC Partners, LP in Class 4 will be paid $141 monthly plus
interest at 5% for a 5-year period under the latest plan.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:
     
    http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb17-52471-49.pdf  

                  About Vern's Auto Repair

Vern's Auto Repair, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 17-52471) on Oct. 26,
2017.  Joseph D. Fontenot, its managing member, signed the
petition.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets
of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge
Ronald B. King presides over the case.  The Debtor is represented
by Steven G. Cennamo, Esq. at Malaise Law Firm as its legal
counsel.


VITAMIN WORLD: Optium Buying Visa/MC Claims for $230K
-----------------------------------------------------
Vitamin World, Inc. and its debtor-affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to authorize the sale
of any and all claims they may hold in connection with the putative
consolidated class action styled In re Payment Interchange Fee and
Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, Case No.
1:05-md-01720-JG-JO, and filed in the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of New York ("Visa/MC Claims") to Optium Fund 2,
LLC for $230,000, subject to overbid.

As of the date of the Motion, one of the few remaining assets of
the Debtors of any material value is their interest in the VC/MC
Claims.  The Debtors' negotiations with the Buyer resulted in the
highest and best offer for the Visa/MC Claims that the Debtors have
received to date.

On June 15, 2018, the Debtors and the Buyer entered into the Asset
Purchase Agreement.  The Debtors will solicit higher and better
bids from at least 41 other entities that have previously expressed
interest in purchasing the Visa/MC Claims or that have, upon
information and belief, expressed an interest in purchasing, or
that have purchased, similar claims in other cases.

The salient terms of the APA are:

     a. Sellers: Vitamin World, Inc., VW Online, Inc., Precision
Engineered Ltd., Vitamin World (V.I.), Inc., Vitamin Depot, LLC,
Vitamin World of Guam, LLC, and Nutrition Warehouse, Inc.

     b. Buyer: Optium Fund 2, LLC

     c. Acquired Assets: Each Debtors' claim for damages arising
from and/or relating to the class action lawsuit entitled In re
Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust
Litigation (Case No. 1:05-MD-1720-JGJO), filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of New York

     d. Purchase Price: $230,000

     e. Private Sale/No Competitive Bidding: The Debtors have
proposed asking higher and better bids on the Visa/MC Claims prior
to or at the Sale Hearing; provided, however, that a bid must be at
least $250,000 to be considered a higher and better bid.

     f. Closing: The closing will take place on or before the 15th
day following entry of the Sale Order.

     g. Relief from Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h): By the Motion, the
Debtors ask a waiver of the 14-day stay under Bankruptcy Rule
6004(h).

A copy of the APA attached to the Motion is available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Vitamin_World_967_Sales.pdf

The Debtors propose that the deadline to file objections to the
Sale will be seven days prior to the Sale Hearing.  A hearing on
the Motion is set for July 9, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. (ET).  The
objection deadline is July 2, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

The Debtors are unaware of any Adverse Interests against the
Visa/MC Claims.  They ask that the Sale be approved free and clear
of all Adverse Interests, with any such Adverse Interests to attach
to the proceeds of the Sale.

The Debtors ask that the Court waives any stay of the Sale Order
under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) or otherwise.  Such relief is
necessary to maximize value for the Debtors' estates, as waiving
any stay of the Sale Order will enable the Debtors to immediately
close the Sale and bring the proceeds of the Visa/MC Claims into
the estate.

The Purchaser:

          OPTIUM FUND 2, LLC
          610 Newport Center Drive
          Suite 610
          Newport Beach, CA 92660
          Attn: CEO
          E-mail: nkornswiet@optiumcapital.com

                       About Vitamin World

Headquartered in Holbrook, New York, Vitamin World is a specialty
retailer in the vitamins, minerals, herbs and supplements market.
The Company offers customers products across all major VMHS and
sports nutrition categories, including, supplements, active
nutrition, multiples, letter vitamins, health and beauty, herbs,
minerals, food and specialty items.

When it filed for bankruptcy, Vitamin World was operating out of
four distribution centers located in Holbrook, New York; Sparks,
Nevada; Riverside, California; and Groveport, Ohio; and 334 retail
stores that are mostly located in malls and outlet centers across
the United States and its territories.  Products are also sold
online at http://www.vitaminworld.com/ The Company has 1,478
active employees.

Vitamin World Inc., VWRE Holdings, Inc. ("RE Holdings") and other
related entities sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 17-11933) on Sept. 11, 2017.  Vitamin World estimated
assets of $50 million to $100 million and debt of $10 million to
$50 million.

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.
Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP is the co-counsel.  Retail
Consulting Services, Inc., is the Debtors' real estate advisors.
RAS Management Advisors, LLC, is the financial advisor.  JND
Corporate Restructuring is the claims and noticing agent.

An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in
the case.  The Committee retained Lowenstein Sandler LLP as lead
counsel; and Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLC as Delaware counsel.

On Dec. 22, 2017, the Court entered an order authorizing the
Debtors to sell substantially all of their assets to Valuable Hero
Limited.  The transaction closed on Jan. 19, 2018.


WEINSTEIN COMPANY: Closes Asset Sale to Lantern Entertainment
-------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Weinstein Company Holdings filed
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court a notice of closing of sale to
Lantern Entertainment.  The notice states, "On July 11, 2018, the
Court entered the Order Approving Amendment to the Asset Purchase
Agreement Entered into by and between the Debtors and Lantern
Entertainment LLC  (the "APA Amendment Order"), which, among other
things, authorized the Debtors to enter into the Second Amendment
to the APA and consummate the Sale to Lantern pursuant to the
Amended APA. The closing of the transactions contemplated by the
Amended APA occurred on July 13, 2018."

As previously reported by The Troubled Company Reporter, Weinstein
Company contemplated on selling substantially all of its assets --
which include a film library and television business -- to Lantern
for $310 million in cash.

                  About The Weinstein Company

The Weinstein Company (TWC) -- http://www.WeinsteinCo.com/-- is a
multimedia production and distribution company launched in 2005 in
New York by Bob and Harvey Weinstein, the brothers who founded
Miramax Films in 1979.  TWC also encompasses Dimension Films, the
genre label founded in 1993 by Bob Weinstein.  During Harvey and
Bob's tenure at Miramax and TWC, they have received 341 Oscar
nominations and won 81 Academy Awards.

TWC dismissed Harvey Weinstein in October 2017, after dozens of
women came forward to accuse him of sexual harassment, assault or
rape.

The Weinstein Company Holdings LLC and 54 affiliates sought Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-10601) on March 19,
2018 after reaching a deal to sell all assets to Lantern Asset
Management for $310 million.

The Weinstein Company Holdings estimated $500 million to $1 billion
in assets and $500 million to $1 billion in liabilities.

The Hon. Mary F. Walrath is the case judge.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP is the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel,
with the engagement led by Paul H. Zumbro, George E. Zobitz, and
Karin A. DeMasi, in New York.

Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., is the local counsel, with the
engagement headed by Mark D. Collins, Paul N. Heath, Zachary I.
Shapiro, Brett M. Haywood, and David T. Queroli, in Wilmington,
Delaware.

The Debtors also tapped FTI Consulting, Inc., as restructuring
advisor; Moelis & Company LLC as investment banker; and Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC as claims and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors on March 28, 2018.  The Committee
has tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones to serve as its legal
counsel and Berkeley Research Group, LLC as its financial advisor.


WM DISTRIBUTION: S. Jesmer Not Entitled to $600K Additional Payment
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the bankruptcy case captioned In re: WM DISTRIBUTION, INC.,
Debtor, No. 17-10535-j11 (Bankr. D.N.M.), cross-motions for summary
judgment were filed on Susan Jesmer d/b/a Native Trading
Associates' claim set forth in her proof of claim and the Debtor's
objection to the claim. Primarily at issue is whether a provision
in a promissory note constitutes an enforceable liquidated damages
provision or an unenforceable penalty. The original principal
amount of the promissory note made by WM and STM in favor of Jesmer
is $1,300,000. The provision of the promissory note in question
requires payment of an additional $600,000 upon the occurrence of
certain events of default.

Based on the facts not in genuine dispute, Bankruptcy JudgeRobert
H. Jacobvitz concludes that WM and STM are entitled to summary
judgment as a matter of law with respect to the $600,000 additional
amount. Summary judgment will be denied with respect to the fees
and expenses components of Jesmer's claim because facts are in
genuine dispute.

The cross-motions for summary judgment addressed two issues: first,
whether Jesmer is entitled to the additional $600,000 owed under
the terms of the Promissory Note upon the occurrence of certain
events of default; and second, whether Jesmer is entitled to
attorneys' fees under the Note. It is undisputed that the principal
balance of $1.3 million, plus the regular interest payments due on
the principal under the Note, are now paid in full.

The Court holds that the facts not subject to material dispute
establish as a matter of law that the $600,000 default damages
amount is an unenforceable penalty. Such amount is so extravagant
or disproportionate to the damages Jesmer would suffer from a
default triggering the liquidated damages provision that it
functions as a punishment rather than compensation. However, facts
not in material dispute fail to establish whether Jesmer is
entitled to the attorneys' fees component of her claim. The Court
will, therefore, deny summary judgment with respect to the
attorneys' fees included in Jesmer's claim.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated June 29,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2zYqcWX from Leagle.com.

WM Distribution, Inc., a Delaware Foreign Profit Corporation,
Debtor, represented by Michael K. Daniels .

United States Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Leonard K.
Martinez-Metzgar, Office of the U.S. Trustee.

               About WM Distribution, Inc.

WM Distribution, Inc., a Delaware Foreign Profit Corporation --
www.wmdistribution.com -- is a small organization in the
advertising promotional products and services industry located in
Albuquerque, NM.  It opened its doors in 2009 and now has four
employees.  Della V. Packingham, president, owns 90% equity
interest in the Company.  The other 10% interest is held by Donna
E. Woody. The Company recorded gross revenue of $7.24 million in
2016 and gross revenue of $6.48 million in 2015.

WM Distribution, Inc., dba Easy Stock Solutions filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D.N.M. Case No. 17-10535), on March 9, 2017. The
petition was signed by Donna Woody, vice president, secretary and
treasurer. The case is assigned to Judge Robert H. Jacobvitz. The
Debtor is represented by William F. Davis, Esq. at William F. Davis
& Assoc., P.C. At the time of filing, the Debtor had $424,987 in
assets and $1.15 million in liabilities.


YORAVI INVESTMENT: Plan Discloses Adequate Protection Payment to RM
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Yoravi Investment, Inc., filed a first amended disclosure statement
explaining its plan of reorganization dated June 27, 2018.

This latest filing provides that the Debtor has deposited the
monthly amount of $731.25 with the Bankruptcy Court as payment for
adequate protection to RM Trust. This amount has been amended to
937.58 as of June of 2018. The total amount deposited by the Debtor
with the Court in favor of RM Trust up to June of 2018 is
$3,862.58.

In the event that the Debtor prevails in the appeal, the deposited
amounts will be withdrawn. If RM Trust prevails and the claim is
finally admitted, the amounts deposited will be delivered to RM
Trust.

The new plan also adds that since the Debtor proposes payment to
creditors of 100% of their claim plus interest, any pre-petition
creditor would receive the same amount of money on their claims as
under the plan. Therefore, no avoidance action could be
successfully pursued, even if the creditors had no right to any of
the defenses stipulated in the Bankruptcy Code. For that reason, no
avoidance actions will be pursued.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb17-05446-11-157.pdf

A full-text copy of the Amended Reorganization Plan is available
at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb17-05446-11-158.pdf

                About Yoravi Investment

Yoravi Investments, Inc., owns a real estate property at Centro
Comercial Turabo Gardens valued at $1.10 million. Yoravi
Investments sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 17-05446) on Aug. 1, 2017. In the
petition signed by Rafael E. Acosta Santiago, vice-president and
treasurer, the Debtor disclosed $1.15 million in assets and
$714,000 in liabilities. Judge Edward A. Godoy presides over the
case. The Debtor tapped Godreau & Gonzalez Law, LLC, as its
bankruptcy counsel, and Enrique Peral Soler, Esq., as special
counsel.


[^] BOOK REVIEW: Oil Business in Latin America: The Early Years
---------------------------------------------------------------
Author:  John D. Wirth Ed.
Publisher:  Beard Books
Softcover:  282 pages
List price:  $34.95
Review by Gail Owens Hoelscher
Buy a copy for yourself and one for a colleague on-line at
http://is.gd/DvFouR

This book grew out of a 1981 meeting of the American Historical
Society. It highlights the origin and evolution of the state-
owned petroleum companies in Argentina, Mexico, Brazil, and
Venezuela.

Argentina was the first country ever to nationalize its
petroleum industry, and soon it was the norm worldwide, with the
notable exception of the United States. John Wirth calls this
phenomenon "perhaps in our century the oldest and most
celebrated of confrontations between powerful private entities
and the state."

The book consists of five case studies and a conclusion, as
follows:

     * Jersey Standard and the Politics of Latin American Oil
          Production, 1911-30 (Jonathan C. Brown)

     * YPF: The Formative Years of Latin America's Pioneer State
          Oil Company, 1922-39 (Carl E. Solberg)

     * Setting the Brazilian Agenda, 1936-39 (John Wirth)

     * Pemex: The Trajectory of National Oil Policy (Esperanza
          Duran)

     * The Politics of Energy in Venezuela (Edwin Lieuwen)

     * The State Companies: A Public Policy Perspective (Alfred
          H. Saulniers)

The authors assess the conditions at the time they were writing,
and relate them back to the critical formative years for each of
the companies under review. They also examine the four
interconnecting roles of a state-run oil industry and
distinguish them from those of a private company. First, is the
entrepreneurial role of control, management, and exploitation of
a nation's oil resources. Second, is production for the private
industrial sector at attractive prices. Third, is the
integration of plans for military, financial, and development
programs into the overall industrial policy planning process.
Finally, in some countries is the promotion of social
development by subsidizing energy for consumers and by promoting
the government's ideas of social and labor policy and labor
relations.

The author's approach is "conceptual and policy oriented rather
than narrative," but they provide a fascinating look at the
politics and development of the region. Mr. Brown provides a
concise history of the early years of the Standard Oil group and
the effects of its 1911 dissolution on its Latin American
operations, as well as power struggles with competitors and
governments that eventually nationalized most of its activities.
Mr. Solberg covers the many years of internal conflict over oil
policy in Argentina and YPF's lack of monopoly control over all
sectors of the oil industry. Mr. Wirth describes the politics
and individuals behind the privatization of Brazil's oil
industry leading to the creation of Petrobras in 1953. Mr. Duran
notes the wrangling between provinces and central government in
the evolution of Pemex, and in other Latin American countries.
Mr. Lieuwin discusses the mixed blessing that oil has proven for
Venezuela., creating a lopsided economy dependent on the ups and
downs of international markets. Mr. Saunders concludes that many
of the then-current problems of the state oil companies were
rooted in their early and checkered histories." Indeed, he says,
"the problems of the past have endured not because the public
petroleum companies behaved like the public enterprises they
are; they have endured because governments, as public owners,
have abdicated their responsibilities to the companies."

Jonh D. Wirth is Gildred Professor of Latin American Studies at
Standford University.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2018.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***