---

         T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Tuesday, September 4, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 246

                            Headlines

7215 N OAKLEY: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended Through Oct. 5
ACI CONCRETE: Quarterly Payments to Unsecureds Increased to $88.9K
ACUSPORT CORP: Seeks November 30 Exclusive Filing Period Extension
ADAMSVILLE PROPERTIES: WFT Opposes Approval of Plan Outline
ADVANCED UNDERGROUND: Unsecureds to be Paid 10% Under Exit Plan

ALCOIL USA: Court Confirms 1st Amended Plan
AMERICAN STEEL: Wells Fargo Seeks OK on Cash Collateral Stipulation
ATD CAPITOL: Seeks November 2 Exclusive Filing Period Extension
B.W. CLEANERS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
BARRAJA INC: Judge Extends Plan Exclusivity Period Until Jan. 8

BARTLETT MANAGEMENT: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended Until Oct. 31
BENFER STORAGE: Ake Buying Houston Property for $1.9 Million
BLACK SQUARE: Wants to Maintain Plan Exclusivity Through Jan. 7
CANADIAN INVESTMENT: S&P Cuts Preferred Share Ratings to 'BB+f'
CAPITOL SUPPLY: Needs More Time For Settlement Discussions

CLA PROPERTIES: Needs Additional Time on Plan Negotiations
CLICKAWAY CORP: Seeks Approval of Cash Collateral Stipulation
COLOR SPOT: Intends to File Plan Pursuant to PSA Timeline
CONDO 64: Unsecured Creditors to be Paid 16% Under Exit Plan
CYTORI THERAPEUTICS: Fails to Comply with Nasdaq Listing Rule

DIFFUSION PHARMACEUTICALS: Obtains Deadline Extension From Nasdaq
DON FRAME TRUCKING: May Use Up To $25,725 in Cash Collateral
EVOLUTION ACADEMY: S&P Alters Outlook to Pos. & Affirms B- Rating
FIRST AVE.: Unsecureds Estimated to Recover 65% of Allowed Claims
FIRST CHICAGO: A.M. Best Raises LongTerm Issuer Credit Rating to b+

FIRSTENERGY SOLUTIONS: To Retire Four Major Power Plants
GASTAR EXPLORATION: Gets Noncompliance Notice from NYSE American
GMD SERVICES: Seeks Jan. 2, 2019 Plan Filing Period Extension
GUMP'S HOLDINGS: Sets Bidding Procedures for IP Assets
H N HINCKLEY: Sept. 20 Continued Cash Collateral Hearing

HARD ROCK EXPLORATION: Trustee to Surrender Life Insurance Policies
HJH CONSULTING: Former Exec Compelled to Produce Tax Returns
ILLINOIS STAR: Ongoing Litigation, Negotiation Delays Plan Filing
JBECKS PROPERTIES: Seeks Authority on Cash Collateral Use
JOHN PALCZUK: District Court Dismisses Steven Conway's Suit

JOURNAL-CHRONICLE: Discloses Additional Loan Documents Modification
KB HOME: Fitch Hikes IDR to 'BB-' & Alters Outlook to Positive
KUM GANG: Seeks Authorization on Cash Collateral Use
LEHMAN BROTHERS: 1st AML, et al., Bid to Dismiss Complaints Junked
LEXINGTON MEDICAL: Fitch Withdraws 'BB+' IDR & Rev. Bond Rating

LIBERTY INDUSTRIES: Regions Bank Bans Further Cash Collateral Use
M/I HOMES: Fitch Hikes IDR to 'BB-' & Alters Outlook to Positive
MARK A ELLIS: Judges Signs Final Cash Collateral Order
MOEINI CORP: Bailey Buying Pensacola Property for $315K
MRPC CHRISTIANA: Sets Sale Procedures for All Assets

NATURE'S SECOND CHANCE: Seeks Sept. 21 Exclusive Period Extension
NINE WEST: Needs More Time for Continuance of Plan Negotiations
PLASTIC2OIL INC: Extends $3 Million Notes Maturity to Dec. 1
POPLAR CREEK: Exclusive Plan Period Extended Through Dec. 31
RED FORK (USA): Sets Bidding Procedures for All Assets

RHA/AFFORDABLE HOUSING: S&P Cuts Ratings on 2012A/A-T Bonds to BB+
ROSE ESKANDARI: Has $1.1 Million Offer for Manassas Property
S & S SENIOR: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
SEVEN STARS: Becomes Largest Shareholder in DBOT
SEVEN STARS: Changes Business Name to Ideanomics

SEVEN STARS: Inks Joint Venture For Real Estate Asset Digitization
SPECIALTY BUILDING: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR, Outlook Stable
SUNGARD AVAILABILITY: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable & Affirms ICR
TOWER BONDING: A.M. Best Lowers Fin'l. Strength Rating to B-(Fair)
TRACY CLEMENT: Trustee Selling Fillmore/Mower Properties at Auction

TREATMENT CENTER: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended Through Oct. 16
UNITED AIRLINES: Fitch Affirms 'BB' IDR, Outlook Stable
URBAN OAKS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
VERTIV GROUP: S&P Cuts Issuer Credit Rating to B, Outlook Negative
WACHUSETT VENTURES: Given Until Oct. 1 to Exclusively File Plan

WELLNESS ANALYSIS: Proposes Heritage Auction of Medical Equipment
WILMINGTON VICTORVILLE: Seeks Dec. 3 Plan Exclusivity Extension
WONDERWORK INC: Thompson Family Foundation Waives Plan Distribution
WOODBRIDGE GROUP: To Continue Mediation with Contrarian Funds
XPEERANT INCORPORATED: Case Summary & 17 Unsecured Creditors

[^] Large Companies with Insolvent Balance Sheet

                            *********

7215 N OAKLEY: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended Through Oct. 5
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Deborah L. Thorne of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois, at the behest of 7215 N Oakley, LLC,
has extended (i) the exclusive period for the Debtor to file a
chapter 11 plan of reorganization to and including October 5, 2018;
and (ii) the exclusive period for the Debtor to solicit acceptances
in favor of a chapter 11 plan of reorganization is extended to and
including December 4, 2019.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor asked the Court to extend the Exclusive Periods within which
to file and solicit acceptances of a chapter 11 plan by 90 days to
and including November 26, 2018 and January 26, 2019,
respectively.

The Debtor contended that certain unresolved contingencies
prevented it from finalizing a chapter 11 plan, namely resolution
of the primary secured claims against it. The primary secured
creditors only filed proofs of claim as of August 15, 2018 and
asserted claims in the aggregate of approximately $4.3 million. The
Debtor needed time to review the proofs of claim and, if necessary,
file objections by the deadline set by the Court of September 15,
2018.

The Debtor said that the outcome of any claim objections will
necessarily influence the treatment of these claims in a chapter 11
plan. Until these claims are resolved by final order of the Court,
however, the Debtor required an extension of exclusivity to propose
and confirm a chapter 11 plan.

In addition, the Debtor asserted that it has made good faith
progress toward reorganization.  The Debtor has already filed a
Disclosure Statement with adequate information and a confirmable
Plan and, since the Initial Motion was filed, obtained authority to
use cash collateral. Moreover, the Debtor told the Court that it
has been paying expenses as they come due -- not only are
postpetition expenses being paid, but the Property is generating
significant net income, and MRR 7215 Oakley LLC's cash collateral
has continued to grow throughout the bankruptcy case.

                        About 7215 N Oakley

7215 N Oakley LLC is an Illinois limited liability corporation with
its principal offices located at 30 Coventry Road, Northfield,
Illinois 60093.  7215 N Oakley listed its business as Single Asset
Real Estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

7215 N Oakley filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case
No. 18-07309) on March 14, 2018.  In the petition signed by Nick
Stein, manager, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of at
least $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Deborah L.
Thorne.  Robert W Glantz, Esq., at Shaw Fishman Glantz & Towbin
LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


ACI CONCRETE: Quarterly Payments to Unsecureds Increased to $88.9K
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Dale L. Somers will convene a hearing on Oct. 12,
2018 at 1:30 p.m. to consider the approval of ACI Concrete
Placement of Kansas, LLC's amended disclosure statement to
accompany their proposed plan of reorganization.

Objections to the Disclosure Statement must be filed and on or
before Sept. 21, 2018.

Under the latest plan, Class 6 General Unsecured Non-Priority
Claims now total approximately $3,200,000. The total amount in the
previous plan was $1,837,261.87. This amount does not include the
Claims of the Insiders of the Debtors which are addressed in Class
7 of the Plan.

The Debtors will pay all Class 6 Claims in full. Debtors will make
quarterly payments on Class 6 Claims beginning no later than
December 2018. The quarterly payments will continue for 10 years
until the full balance of Class 6 Claims are paid. Class 6 Claims
will be paid on a pro rata basis for each payment. The quarterly
payments will be $88,900 instead of the $62,280 provided in the
previous plan.

Class 6 is impaired and the General Unsecured Non-Priority
Creditors will vote on the plan.

The Debtors believe the Plan is feasible. The Debtors' 5-year
projection projects a continued receipt of income and payment to
creditors. The Plan will allow all claims to receive an equal or
larger payment than they would receive in a Chapter 7 Liquidation.

Full-text copies of the Amended Disclosure Statement are available
at:

     https://tinyurl.com/y9xssmh3
     http://bankrupt.com/misc/ksb17-21770-300.pdf

                 About ACI Concrete Placement

ACI Concrete Placement of Kansas LLC, ACI Concrete Placement of
Lincoln LLC, ACI Concrete Placement of Oklahoma LLC, OKK Equipment
LLC and KOK Holdings LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kan. Case Nos. 17-21770 to 17-21774) on
Sept. 14, 2017.  Matthew Kaminsky, their chief operating officer,
signed the petitions.  The cases are jointly administered.

Founded in 2007, ACI Concrete Placement provides concrete pumping
and telebelt material placement.  In addition to its traditional
concrete placement services, ACI specializes in slip form concrete
placement and separate placing booms.  It owns a fleet of over 55
machines for slope paving, indoor pumping, and small set up areas,
small line and grout pumps and truck mounted conveyors, etc.  ACI
Concrete is headquartered in Spring Hill, Kansas, with additional
locations in Nebraska, Missouri, and Oklahoma.

ACI-Kansas is wholly owned by debtor KOK Holdings, LLC.
ACI-Oklahoma, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company headquartered
in Kansas, owned by: Lawrence Kaminsky who owns 70% of the company
and Matthew Kaminsky who owns 30% of the company.  ACI-Lincoln, a
Nebraska Limited Liability Company headquartered in Kansas, owned
by: Lawrence Kaminsky who owns 70% of the company and Matthew
Kaminsky who owns 30% of the company.  KOK is owned by: Lawrence
Kaminsky who owns 50% of the company and Matthew Kaminsky who owns
50% of the company.  OKK is wholly owned by the Debtor KOK
Holdings, LLC.

ACI-Kansas, ACI-Oklahoma and ACI-Lincoln function as concrete
pouring companies in their respective states.  OKK serves as the
common equipment ownership company for all ACI companies.  KOK
serves as the parent holding company of the various companies and
also functions as the payroll processor for the related ACI
companies.  The same management structure operates all five Debtors
and their operations are centrally located in Spring Hill, Kansas.

At the time of the filing, ACI Kansas disclosed $1.06 million in
assets and $8.4 million in liabilities.

Judge Dale L. Somers presides over the cases.

Bradley D. McCormack, Esq., at the Sader Law Firm, serves as the
Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtors hired Duncan Financial
Group, LLC as financial consultant; Altus Global Trade Solutions as
collection agent; and GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC,
and Tarsus CFO Services, LLC as consultants.

On November 1, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee is
represented by Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C.


ACUSPORT CORP: Seeks November 30 Exclusive Filing Period Extension
------------------------------------------------------------------
ASPC Corp., formerly known as AcuSport Corporation, requests the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio to extend
(a) the Exclusive Filing Period during which Debtor has the
exclusive right to file a chapter 11 plan through November 30,
2018, and (b) the Exclusive Solicitation Period during which Debtor
has the exclusive right to solicit acceptances of any plan filed
during the Exclusive Filing Period through and including January
31, 2019.

On June 13, 2018, the Court entered the Bar Date Order,
establishing July 27, 2018 as the general deadline for filing of
proofs of claim, and October 29, 2018 as the deadline for
governmental units to file proofs of claim.

On June 28, 2018, the Court entered the Sale Order, approving the
sale of certain of Debtor’s assets and the assumption and
assignment of certain of Debtor's unexpired leases and executory
contracts. On July 2, the Debtor filed the Notice indicating that
the Sale closed on June 29, 2018.

The Debtor contends that much of its time and efforts during the
initial phase of this case were devoted towards closing the Sale,
which involved unique issues and extensive negotiation with
multiple parties in interest. The outcome of the Sale process
pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 363 heavily impacted the nature of
any plan that could be proposed to the Court.

The Debtor believes that the proposal, solicitation, and
confirmation of a chapter 11 plan of liquidation are in the best
interests of Debtor, its estate, and creditors. Over the past four
weeks, the Debtor has engaged in continuing negotiations with the
Committee, and has generally reached agreement with the Committee
on an agreed form of joint plan of liquidation as to which it will
seek approval.

The Debtor expects that the Committee will join it in seeking
approval and confirmation of such a joint plan of liquidation. The
parties are currently engaged in the drafting and negotiation of a
joint disclosure statement, and hope to submit both items for
approval by the Court within the next two weeks

                   About AcuSport Corp.

Based in Bellefontaine, Ohio, AcuSport Corporation is a nationwide
distributor of shooting sports products and business solutions for
the independent firearms retailer with regional sales offices in
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Minnesota, Texas, Montana and
California.

AcuSport Corporation, based in Bellefontaine, OH, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Ohio Case No. 18-52736) on May 1, 2018.
In the petition signed by CFO John K. Flanagan, the Debtor
estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $50 million to
$100 million in liabilities.

The Hon. John E. Hoffman Jr. presides over the case.

The Debtor hired Allen Kuehnle Stovall & Neuman LLP, as local
counsel; Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, as general counsel; Huron
Transaction Advisory LLC, as investment banker; Huron Consulting
Services LLC, as financial advisor; and Donlin Recano & Company,
Inc., as claims noticing & solicitation agent.


ADAMSVILLE PROPERTIES: WFT Opposes Approval of Plan Outline
-----------------------------------------------------------
West Fallowfield Township has criticized the disclosure statement
filed by Adamsville Properties, LLC, saying it does not provide
"adequate information."

"The disclosure statement does not contain adequate information
regarding the source of payments to creditors or why the debtor has
been unable or unwilling to pay its post-petition obligations
including but not limited to the objecting party's sewer charges,"
said the creditor's attorney Alan Shaddinger, Esq., at Shaddinger
Law Office, in Meadville, Pennsylvania.

Mr. Shaddinger also said the disclosure statement does not provide
adequate information about Adamsville's past efforts and future
plans to sell its real estate or to try to maximize the value of
the assets for the benefit of creditors.

West Fallowfield can be reached through:

     Alan R. Shaddinger, Esq.
     Shaddinger Law Office
     Meadville, PA 6335
     Phone: (814) 795-2621
     Email: ars@shaddingerlaw.com

                    About Adamsville Properties

Adamsville Properties, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
W.D. Pa. Case No. 16-10923) on Sept. 22, 2016.  The petition was
signed by its President, John Medas.  At the time of filing, the
Debtor's assets and liabilities were estimated to be between
$100,000 to $500,000 each.

The Debtor is a single asset real estate business that, in the
past, has not earned income.  The Debtor is a Pennsylvania Limited
Liability Company with a principal place of business located at
3982 Main Street, Adamsville, Pennsylvania 16110.

The Debtor is represented by Michael P. Kruszewski, Esq., at Quinn
Buseck Leemhuis Toohey & Kroto, Inc., in Erie, Pennsylvania.  The
Debtor tapped Re/Max Hometown Realty as its real estate broker.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.

In May 2017, Judge Thomas Agresti approved the sale of the Debtor's
building and property at 3982 Main St., Adamsville, to NH
Medicinals (Minnesota) Inc. for $339,000, subject to certain
conditions.  The Court approved the sale after no objections were
filed.

On July 5, 2018, the Debtor filed its proposed Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.


ADVANCED UNDERGROUND: Unsecureds to be Paid 10% Under Exit Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
General unsecured creditors of Advanced Underground Inspection, LLC
will be paid 10% of their claims under the company's proposed plan
to exit Chapter 11 protection.

Under the plan of reorganization, Class 7 general unsecured
creditors, whose claims against the company total $5,001 or more,
will recover 10% of their claims.  These creditors will receive 20
equal quarterly payments beginning on the last business day of the
first full quarter after the effective date of the plan and
continuing on the last business day of each consecutive quarter
thereafter until paid in full.  Class 7 claims total $808,125.59.

Meanwhile, the company proposes to pay Class 8 general unsecured
creditors, whose claims total $5,000 or less, 10% of their claims
on the last business day of the first month of the first full
quarter after the effective date.

Advanced Underground will fund the plan through the income
generated from the operations of its business.  Other sources of
cash may be explored and utilized to the extent that such cash
infusions are necessary.  The company may seek to obtain
refinancing from a lending institution or from another source to
satisfy the cash payments, according to its disclosure statement
filed on August 23 with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Michigan.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb18-46416-107.pdf

              About Advanced Underground Inspection

Established in 2001, Advanced Underground Inspection, LLC --
http://www.auinspection.com/-- provides underground storm and
sanitary line video inspections services to include sewer cleaning,
catch basin and manhole cleaning, grouting, air testing, pipe and
manhole rehabilitation, and site restoration.  Additionally,
Advanced Underground Inspection, LLC provides ancillary services
related to storm/sewer systems for pump stations and waste water
treatment plants including: sludge removal, waterblasting, disposal
services and hydro-excavating.  The Company is headquartered in
Westland, Michigan.

Advanced Underground Inspection filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
E.D. Mich. Case No. 18-46416) on May 1, 2018.  In the petition
signed by Jeana Garcia Moir, president, the Debtor disclosed
$860,087 in total assets and $2.55 million in total liabilities.
The case is assigned to Judge Thomas J. Tucker.  The Debtor is
represented by Lynn M. Brimer, Esq. at Strobl & Sharp, PC.


ALCOIL USA: Court Confirms 1st Amended Plan
-------------------------------------------
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on
Aug. 24 confirmed Alcoil USA, LLC's first amended Chapter 11 plan
dated August 8, 2018.

The First Amended Plan provided:

   * Class 5: Ben Franklin Technology Center of Central and
Northern Pennsylvania, Inc.  As of the Petition Date, Ben Franklin
had a second priority security interest and lien in the Debtor’s
Intellectual Property.  Mr. Franklin is scheduled as being owed
$552,701.84.  He will not receive any payment on account of a
secured Claim.  If he so elects on its ballot when voting with
respect to the Plan, Mr. Franklin will be treated as an unsecured
creditor under Class 7 as to its allowed Claim.

   * Class 6: Sandhurst Equity Partners, L.P.  As of the Petition
Date, Sandhurst held a second priority lien in the Debtor’s
Personal Property, except for vehicles. Such lien was second in
priority to the lien of M&T Bank.  During the course of the case,
pursuant to the Sale Order, all of the Personal Property of the
Debtor has been sold.  The net sale proceeds, after payment of the
costs of sale, and after payment in full of the M&T Bank secured
Claim, has been placed in escrow pursuant to the Sale Order
following an objection by Donald C. Graham, the holder of a Class 7
unsecured Claim in the Case, to the distribution to Sandhurst.  The
net balance from the proceeds under the Sale Order shall be paid to
Sandhurst, after payment of all allowed Class 1 Professional
Administrative Expenses and Class 2 Administrative Expenses and as
set forth hereinafter, unless the Court orders otherwise.  Until
such time as distribution is made to Sandhurst, Sandhurst shall
retain its lien in the Net Sale Proceeds, to the extent that the
Court determines that such lien exists.  In the event the Court
determines that such lien does not exist, then Sandhurst shall have
no lien as to the Net Sale Proceeds.

   * Class 7: General Unsecured Creditors.  Class 7 includes all
other Claim holders of the Debtor who are not otherwise classified
under the Plan, including all general unsecured creditors, and any
Claims of other parties, regardless of the entry of judgments in
favor of any such creditors.  In the event that payment of the Net
Sale Proceeds occurs to Sandhurst, no distribution shall occur to
Class 7 unsecured creditors.  In the event it is determined by the
Court that Sandhurst is not entitled to the Net Sale Proceeds, then
after payment in full of all Class 1 Professional Administrative
Claims, Class 2 Administrative Claims and Class 3 Priority Tax
Claims, the Class 7 unsecured Claim holders shall receive a pro
rata distribution up to the full amount of any the Net Sale
Proceeds, at Final Distribution, subject to the provisions of
Section 5.3.4.  It should be noted that under the Sale Order there
has been a $40,000 sum set aside for legal fees and other
professional fees, and such funds do not constitute part of the Net
Sale Proceeds.

   Prior to Final Distribution, all ongoing administrative
expenses, including professional fees for attorneys and
accountants, the costs of preparing and filing interim and final
tax returns, the costs of distributions and, as necessary, payment
of fees to the Office of the U.S. Trustee shall occur.  Thereafter,
distribution shall be made pro rata to Class 7 unsecured creditors.
Final Distribution shall occur within a reasonable period of time
after the Effective Date of the Plan.  The Disbursing Agent shall
be permitted reasonable compensation for services in connection
with the distributions.

   * Class 8: Equity Holder.  The equity interest of Wand
Investments, as owned by Steven M. Wand, the 100% holder of the
membership interests in the Debtor.  The equity held by the Equity
Holder is to be cancelled under the Plan.  The Equity Holder shall
retain its equity in the Debtor only until Final Distribution.
Upon Final Distribution occurring, the equity shall be deemed
canceled.  The president of the Debtor, Mr. Wand, shall remain as
president for purposes of causing the Plan to be effectuated and
for Final Distribution to occur.

The First Amended Plan further provides that all of the Debtor's
Personal Property has been sold pursuant to the Sale Order and
liquidated.  Distribution of the Net Sale Proceeds will occur as
set forth above to the Class 6 Claim holder, Sandhurst, or to the
Class 7 unsecured creditors, subject to the payments set forth in
Section 5.3.4.  The Debtor has no additional remaining Assets.

A redlined version of the First Amended Disclosure Statement from
PacerMonitor.com is available at https://tinyurl.com/y6v5ymll at no
charge.

                    About Alcoil USA LLC

Based in York, Pennsylvania, Alcoil USA, LLC --
http://www.alcoil.net/-- is a manufacturer of all-aluminum
micro-channel heat exchangers for the air conditioning,
refrigeration, ventilation, heating, and industrial process
industries.  It specializes in airside condensers, evaporators,
heating/cooling coils, oil coolers, and process applications.
Alcoil supports a wide range of OEM and replacement applications.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 17-03078) on July 26, 2017.  Steve
Wand, its president, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.

Judge Henry W. Van Eck presides over the case.


AMERICAN STEEL: Wells Fargo Seeks OK on Cash Collateral Stipulation
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida of an Agreed
Order authorizing American Steel Processing Company to use cash
collateral for payment of adequate protection to Wells Fargo.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor and Wells Fargo entered into
certain Loan and Security Agreements for the purchase of certain
equipment.  Wells Fargo asserts that it owns and possesses valid
and properly perfected first-priority security interests and liens
on the Equipment Collateral.  Wells Fargo further asserts that as
of the Petition Date, the amount due and owing from the Debtor to
Wells Fargo was (a) delinquent monthly payments in the total amount
of $11,893; and (b) a total outstanding balance of $141,420,
exclusive of attorneys' fees, late charges and costs.

The proposed Agreed Order provides for adequate protection payments
to Wells Fargo in the  total amount of $1,230 twice a month, on the
5th and 20th of each month, for the Equipment Collateral.  All
payments will be made to Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc.,
Attn.: Henry C. Magel Jr., 150 East 42nd Street, 38th Floor, New
York, NY 10017.

In addition, the Debtor will maintain insurance coverage as
required under the respective Loan Agreements. Wells Fargo will be
named as a loss payee on the insurance policy associated with
Equipment Collateral and will be provided with any and all notices
under the insurance policy(s).

Moreover, the Debtor will keep the collateral in good and
reasonable condition and will perform regular maintenance on the
same in accordance with commercially reasonable standards for such
equipment. Wells Fargo will also be entitled to inspection of its
collateral.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at

                http://bankrupt.com/misc/flnb18-50060-239.pdf

Attorneys for Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc.

      Kenneth B. Jacobs, Esq.
      Jason B. Burnett, Esq.
      Gray Robinson, P.A.
      50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
      Jacksonville, Florida 32202
      Telephone: (904) 598-9929
      Facsimile: (904) 598-9109

                 American Steel Processing Company

American Steel Processing Company is a steel fabricator in Panama
City, Florida, founded in July 1998.  American Steel Processing
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No. 18-50060) on
Feb. 26, 2018.  In the petition signed by Thomas J. Fanell,
president and CEO, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at
$1 million to $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Karen K.
Specie.  The Charles Wynn Law Offices, P.A., is the Debtor's
counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case.


ATD CAPITOL: Seeks November 2 Exclusive Filing Period Extension
---------------------------------------------------------------
ATD Capitol, LLC requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida extend (a) the Exclusive Filing Period
to through and including Nov. 2, 2018, (b) the Exclusive
Solicitation Period to through and including Jan. 1, 2019, and (c)
the Procedures Order Deadline to through and including Nov. 2,
2018.

The Debtor avers that since the Petition Date, devoted a
significant amount of time complying with the requirements of
operating as a debtor-in-possession during a Chapter 11 case, which
includes making required post-petition payments, and effectively
managing its operations and finances. Thus, the Debtor believes
that there are reasonable prospects for filing a viable plan.  

The Debtor is a wholly owned subsidiary of Capitol Supply, Inc.,
who is also a debtor in a bankruptcy case pending before the Court
at In re Capitol Supply, Inc., Case No: 17-21544-EPK.

The Debtor asserts that its proposed reorganization will be
impacted by the outcome of the appeal of the Court's decision with
respect to a contested matter in Capitol Supply's bankruptcy case.


The Debtor contends that it is not seeking to use exclusivity to
pressure creditors into accepting a plan they find unacceptable. To
the contrary, the Debtor is requesting an extension in order to
have additional time to allow Capitol Supply to pursue settlement
negotiations with the United States and its primary secured lender,
and the Debtor to formulate a plan of reorganization and disclosure
statement based on the outcome of such negotiations without
incurring legal fees associated with presently preparing a plan and
disclosure statement.

Specifically, Capitol Supply obtained an order from the Court
enforcing the stay against an action by the United States, one of
its largest unsecured creditors, and Louis Scutellaro pending
before the District Court for the District of Columbia. Thereafter,
the United States appealed the Court's decision to the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and the
matter has been fully briefed.

The Debtor argues that its proposed reorganization will also be
impacted by the outcome of Capitol Supply's negotiations with its
primary secured lender. Capitol Supply has been engaged in
settlement discussions regarding the DC Case, consensual plan terms
and other related issues with the United States and its primary
secured creditor.

While Capitol Supply has made significant progress, the Debtor
requires additional time to permit Capitol Supply to continue such
settlement discussions with the United States and its secured
lender prior to the Debtor formulating and proposing its plan of
reorganization and disclosure statement.  

                        About ATD Capitol

ATD Capitol, LLC, was incorporated on Aug. 12 2015, and is in the
office and public building furniture business.  ATD is an affiliate
of Capitol Supply, Inc., which sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-21544) on Sept. 20, 2017.

ATD Capitol, LLC, based in Boca Raton, FL, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-22257) on Oct. 9, 2017.  In
the petition signed by Robert J. Steinman, president, the Debtor
estimated $100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  The Hon. Paul G. Hyman, Jr. presides over
the case.  Bradley Shraiberg, Esq., at Shraiberg Landau & Page,
P.A., serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.  An official
committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case.


B.W. CLEANERS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-------------------------------------------------------
No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of B.W. Cleaners, LLC as of August 31,
according to a court docket.

                     About B.W. Cleaners LLC

B.W. Cleaners, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 18-03729) on June 3,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets of less than $100,000 and liabilities of $1
million.  Judge Marian F. Harrison presides over the case.


BARRAJA INC: Judge Extends Plan Exclusivity Period Until Jan. 8
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Sean H. Lane of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York, at the behest of Barraja, Inc., has extended
the Debtor's exclusive period to file a plan of reorganization
pursuant to Section 1121 of the Bankruptcy Code through and
including January 8, 2019.

                        About Barraja Inc.

Barraja, Inc. does business as Thalia Restaurant, at 250 W. 50th
St., New York.

Barraja filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case No. 18-10692) on March 13, 2018, listing assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of less than $1 million.   The petition was
signed by Shaul Natan, president

The Debtor tapped Arnold Mitchell Greene, Esq., at Robinson Brog
Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck P.C. as its legal counsel.


BARTLETT MANAGEMENT: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended Until Oct. 31
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Mary P. Gorman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of Illinois, at the behest of Bartlett Management
Services, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates, has extended the
Exclusivity Periods to file and to solicit acceptances of a chapter
11 plan for an additional 90 days to Oct. 31, 2018, and Dec. 31,
2018, respectively.

               About Bartlett Management Services

Bartlett Management Services, Inc., Bartlett Management
Indianapolis, Inc., and Bartlett Management Peoria, Inc., owned 33
current franchises of KFC Corporation, the franchisor of the
Kentucky Fried Chicken quick-services restaurant chain that
provides a diverse menu of chicken and related side dishes and
desserts.  As of Feb. 28, 2018, Bartlett are operating 32
locations, 28 of which are leased.

Bartlett Management Services and its affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. C.D. Ill. Lead Case No. 17-71890) on Dec. 5,
2017.  The Debtors have sought joint administration of the cases
under Case No. 17-71890.

In the petitions signed by Robert E. Clawson, president, Bartlett
estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and $10 million to
$50 million in liabilities.

The Hon. Mary P. Gorman presides over the cases.

Jonathan A Backman, Esq., at the Law Office of Jonathan A. Backman,
serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtors.  The Debtors tapped
Valenti Florida Management, Inc., as accountant and financial
advisor, Steven A. Nerger of Silverman Consulting, Inc., as chief
restructuring officer.

On Jan. 8, 2018, the Office of the United States Trustee appointed
an Unsecured Creditors' Committee in each of the three cases.  On
Jan. 19, 2018, counsel filed appearances on behalf of all three
Committees.  Goldstein & McClintock LLLP is representing the
Committees.


BENFER STORAGE: Ake Buying Houston Property for $1.9 Million
------------------------------------------------------------
Benfer Storage, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas to authorize the sale of the real
property located at 5135 Mittlestedt, Houston, Texas to Gerson D.
Ake for $1.85 million.

Objections, if any, must be filed within 21 days from the date the
Notice was served.

Benfer is a for profit limited liability company located at the
Mittlestedt Property which was incorporated on April 13, 2015.  It
operates a commercial storage center and mini storage units on the
Mittlestedt Property.  Benfer is managed by its two managers
Alberto Bernadoni and Betania Whittle, who are also Benfer's only
employees.

Pursuant to Benfer's Plan and the Order confirming its Plan of
Reorganization, Benfer is required to reopen the bankruptcy case
and ask approval of the Court of any proposed sale of the
Mittlestedt Property.

Benfer has executed a real estate purchase agreement with the Buyer
for the purchase of the Mittlestedt Property for $1,850,000, which
is sufficient to pay all allowed claims secured on the Mittlestedt
Property.  The earnest money deposit is $5,000.  The contract for
sale for the Mittlestedt Property is along with the cashier's check
for the earnest money.  

Benfer asks that the Court approves the sale of the Mittlestedt
Property as per the terms provided for in the executed real estate
purchase agreement and the Confirmation Order.  It asks that the
Court approves the sale of Property free and clear of all liens,
claims, interests, and encumbrances.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Benfer_Storage_152_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser:

          Gerson D. Ake
          2550 North Loop West
          Suite 259
          Houston, TX 77092
          Telephone: (713) 878-8884
          E-mail: danielake@hotmail.com

                   About Benfer Storage LLC

Benfer Storage LLC, based in Houston, Texas, offers storage spaces
for rent on a prepaid basis.  

Benfer Storage filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. S.D.
Tex. Case No. 17-32767) on May 1, 2017.  In the petition signed by
Alberto Bernadoni, president, the Debtor estimated $1 million to
$10 million in assets and $500,000 to $1 million in liabilities.  

The Hon. Jeff Bohm presides over the case.  Susan Tran, Esq., at
Corral Tran Singh, LLP, serves as bankruptcy counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors was appointed in the
Chapter 11 case.

On Feb. 13, 2018, the Court confirmed the Debtor's Chapter 11 Small
Business Disclosure Statement and Chapter 11 Small Business Plan.

On Feb. 15, 2018, the Court closed Benfer's bankruptcy case.



BLACK SQUARE: Wants to Maintain Plan Exclusivity Through Jan. 7
---------------------------------------------------------------
Black Square Financial, LLC requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida to extend the exclusive period
within which it can solicit acceptances to its plan of
reorganization by approximately 120 days through and including Jan.
7, 2019.

The Debtor assures the Court that it is not seeking an extension to
delay the administration of the case or to pressure creditors to
accept an unsatisfactory plan. Rather, the Debtor is attempting to
resolve the claim of its primary creditor, which will in turn lead
to confirmation of a chapter 11 plan.

The Debtor relates that since the Petition Date, it has generally
made all required post-petition payments, managed its business
operations, and filed the Plan and Disclosure Statement on January
5, 2018. The Debtor has also produced substantial documentation to
its primary creditor, Client First Settlement Funding, LLC, and
engaged in settlement discussions.

The Debtor has objected to Client First's claim and also filed a
motion to compel mediation with Client First. The motion to compel
mediation is scheduled for hearing on September 24, 2018. However,
the current deadline for the Debtor to solicit acceptances to the
Plan is slated to expire on September 4, 2018.

                   About Black Square Financial

Headquartered in Coral Springs, Florida, Black Square Financial,
LLC, is a structured settlement firm that provides liquidity to its
clients by purchasing their right to receive future installment
payments awarded pursuant to a settlement agreement, or in the case
of clients that have previously purchased an annuity plan, the
right to receive future annual disbursements paid to the clients
pursuant to the annuity plan.

Black Square Financial filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-23562) on Nov. 8, 2017, estimating
assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities of less than $1
million.

Judge John K. Olson presides over the case.

Philip J. Landau, Esq., at Shraiberg Landau & Page PA, is the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor hired The Mack Law Group,
P.C., Eason and Tambornini ALC, Crawford & Von Keller LLC, and
Beaugureau, Hancock, Stoll & Schwartz, P.C., as special counsel.

On Jan. 4, 2018, the Debtor filed its proposed Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.


CANADIAN INVESTMENT: S&P Cuts Preferred Share Ratings to 'BB+f'
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it lowered its fund credit quality and
Canadian national scale preferred share ratings to 'BB+f' from
'BBB-f' and to 'P-3(high)f' from 'P-2(low)f', respectively. The
downgrade is a result of the decision by the investment manager,
Purpose Investment Inc., to alter the fund's investment strategy to
increase exposures to underlying investments that are not rated by
S&P Global. At the same time, S&P has affirmed the 'S4' volatility
rating assigned to the fund.

Subsequently, S&P withdrew the ratings on the Canadian Investment
Grade Preferred Share Fund at the request of the fund's investment
manager. As of August 30, S&P Global Ratings will no longer
undertake its monthly surveillance on the credit quality and the
volatility profile of this fund.

On Aug. 24, 2018, the Canadian Investment Grade Preferred Share
Fund comprised approximately C$58 million in assets under
management. S&P said, "At the time of the rating withdrawal, the
credit quality of the fund had, in our opinion, deteriorated
primarily because the fund maintained slightly over 2% exposure to
securities that either were not consistent with the mapping of a
third party's internal credit scoring system or were not rated by
S&P Global Ratings. We view such securities, under our fund credit
quality rating approach, as equivalent to being rated 'CC'. Given
the strategic decision to continue having increased exposures to
securities receiving a matrix treatment consistent with those with
lower credit quality and a more aggressive determination for credit
exposure within the portfolio risk assessment, we maintain our
opinion of the fund volatility profile as consistent with an 'S4'
fund volatility rating."  

The 'BB+f' fund credit quality rating signified the fund's
selection of portfolio holdings provides weak protection against
losses from credit defaults. The 'P-3(high)f' Canadian scale rating
was fully determined by the applicable global scale rating, and
there are no additional analytical criteria associated with the
determination of ratings on the Canadian scale. The 'S4' fund
volatility rating signified the fund exhibits moderate to high
volatility of returns comparable to a portfolio of long-duration
duration government securities, typically maturing beyond 10 years
and denominated in the base currency of the funds.

S&P Global Ratings' fund credit quality ratings, identified by the
'f' subscript, are forward-looking opinions about the overall
credit quality of a fixed–income fund's portfolio. Fund credit
quality ratings range from 'AAAf' (extremely strong protection
against losses from credit default) to 'CCCf' (extremely vulnerable
to losses from credit defaults). The ratings from 'AAf' to 'CCCf'
may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to
show relative standing within the major rating categories.

S&P's fund volatility ratings, identified by the 'S' subscript, are
forward-looking opinions about a fixed-income fund's sensitivity to
changing market conditions. Volatility ratings range from 'S1+'
(lowest sensitivity) to 'S5' (highest sensitivity).

An S&P Global Ratings' preferred share rating on the Canadian scale
is a forward-looking opinion about the creditworthiness of an
obligor with respect to a specific preferred share obligation
issued in the Canadian market relative to preferred shares issued
by other issuers in the Canadian market. It is S&P's practice to
present an issuer's preferred share ratings on both the global
rating scale and on the Canadian national scale when listing the
ratings for a particular issuer.


CAPITOL SUPPLY: Needs More Time For Settlement Discussions
----------------------------------------------------------
Capitol Supply, Inc. requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida for an extension of the Exclusive
Filing Period for a period of 60 days to through and including Nov.
2, 2018, and an extension of the Exclusive Solicitation Period for
a period of 60 days to through and including Jan. 1, 2019.

The Debtor further requests that the Procedures Order Deadline be
extended to through and including November 2, 2018.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtor has devoted a significant
amount of time:

     (a) complying with the requirements of operating as a
debtor-in-possession during a Chapter 11 case,

     (b) defending the appeal of the Court's order granting in part
the Debtor's motion to enforce the automatic stay against an action
by the United States and Louis Scutellaro pending before the
District Court for the District of Columbia,

     (c) negotiating the sale of the Debtor's interest in certain
agreements and related business divisions with proposed sellers and
the Debtor's secured lender,

     (d) obtaining court approval of such sales and related
contract assignments, and

     (e) preparing cash budgets for continued use of cash
collateral and projections for a plan.

Additionally, the Debtor is in settlement discussions with one of
its largest unsecured creditors, the United States, with respect to
the claims asserted in the DC Case, and with its secured lender,
Bank of America, with respect to potential consensual plan terms.

While it has made significant progress, the Debtor requires
additional time pursue such settlement discussions with the United
States and Bank of America and to formulate its plan of
reorganization.

                      About Capitol Supply

Since 1983, Capitol Supply, Inc., has provided the United States
Government, the U.S. Military, State and local government agencies
and consumer and commercial customers worldwide various products
needed to operate their businesses.  Capitol Supply offers office
supply, office furniture, hardware, tools, auto parts, cleaning
supplies, dorms and quarters, package room, and GSA schedule
needs.

Capitol Supply was formerly known as Capitol Furniture Distributing
Company and changed its name to Capitol Supply, Inc., in March
2005.

Capitol Supply, based in Boca Raton, Florida, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-21544) on Sept. 20, 2017.
In  the petition signed by CEO Robert J. Steinman, the Debtor
estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and liabilities.  The
Hon. Erik P. Kimball presides over the case.  Bradley S. Shraiberg,
Esq., at Shraiberg Landaue & Page, P.A., serves as bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtor.

The Debtor tapped Holly A. Roth and Reed Smith LLP as special
counsel to assist the Debtor with matters relating to the claims
raised under the False Claims Act by the United States of America
against the Debtor, including reviewing and negotiating a proposed
settlement with respect to such claims.


CLA PROPERTIES: Needs Additional Time on Plan Negotiations
----------------------------------------------------------
CLA Properties SPE, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates request the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona to extend the time
during which the Debtors have the exclusive right to file a plan to
November 29, 2018.

This is the second time the Debtors have sought to extend the
Exclusivity Period.  Pursuant to the Court's May 30, 2018 Order,
the Exclusivity Period is currently set to expire on Aug. 31, 2018.
The Debtor believes that extending the Exclusivity Period to the
Extended Date will facilitate moving its case towards
confirmation.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtors' main focus has been on the
leases for their various locations to ensure continued operations
at all sites.  In so doing, the Debtors have conquered a
significant hurdle to reorganization in reaching a number of
agreements with ECE I, LLC, the landlord and/or property owner of
all of the 2017 Debtors' locations.  Further, the Debtors have
reached an agreement with Spirit SPE Portfolio 2012-5, LLC the
landlord for Children's Learning Adventure of Nevada, LLC, CLA Fall
Creek, LLC and CLA Woodlands, LLC and have obtained an order
extending the time within which to assume or reject the Debtors'
lease with Jinbo, LLC to October 5, 2018.

Thus, having utilized most of the Exclusivity Period to negotiate
and reach agreements with their landlords, the Debtors contend that
they have not had sufficient time to prepare the analysis of their
operations and restructuring alternative, and the other documents,
such as projections and a liquidation analysis, that are necessary
to propose a plan of reorganization and disclosure statement. Now,
they are continuing to negotiate long term solutions with their
creditors.

The Debtors seek this extension to enable them to continue work
with their creditors, a process that is ongoing, and would be
interrupted, if not made impossible, if a plan is proposed by
someone other than the Debtor at this time. The Debtors are not
using the extension process as a way to obtain leverage against
their creditors and are not seeking to extend the Exclusivity
Periods to pressure any creditors into accepting a plan of
reorganization.

The Debtors are maintaining ongoing operations on all of their
locations. Their bills continue to be paid as they come due. The
Debtors are still in the process of determining the specifics of
the Plan and additional time is needed to allow for an informed
dialogue about and analysis of the Debtors’ future economic
prospects. The Debtors operate as part of a very successful
consolidated business, with annual revenues over $100,000,000 and
there is reason to believe that the Debtors will not only prosper,
but ultimately confirm a viable plan of reorganization.

                  About CLA Properties SPE

CLA Properties SPE, based in Scottsdale, Arizona, and its
debtor-affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Ariz.
Lead Case No. 17-14851) on Dec. 18, 2017.  The debtor-affiliates
are CLA Maple Grove, LLC; CLA Carmel, LLC; CLA West Chester, LLC;
CLA One Loudoun, LLC; CLA Fishers, LLC; CLA Chanhassen, LLC; CLA
Ellisville, LLC; CLA Farm, LLC; and CLA Westerville, LLC.

The cases are jointly administered before the Hon. Brenda Moody
Whinery.

In the petition signed by Richard Sodja, its authorized
representative, CLA estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets
and liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Michael W. Carmel, Esq., at Michael W. Carmel,
Ltd., as bankruptcy counsel; Schian Walker, PLC, as co-counsel; and
Cockriel & Christofferson, LLC, as special counsel.


CLICKAWAY CORP: Seeks Approval of Cash Collateral Stipulation
-------------------------------------------------------------
Clickaway Corporation requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of California for approval to use cash collateral
pursuant the Stipulation and Budget.

The Debtor proposes to use cash collateral to pay operating
expenses in the ordinary course pending confirmation of a chapter
11 plan, which may continue until a plan of reorganization has been
confirmed, the case has been dismissed or converted to chapter 7,
whichever occurs first.

Thomas Hexner is the Debtor's only secured creditor with an
interest in cash collateral.  Hexner is a personal friend of the
Debtor's CEO Richard Sutherland, who entered into a Security
Agreement with the Debtor.  Concurrently, the Debtor executed a
Promissory Note to borrow the sum of $75,000 from Hexner secured by
all assets of the Debtor in order to allow the Debtor to have
sufficient cash to pay its pre-petition chapter 11 retainer to
proposed bankruptcy counsel, Binder &  Malter LLP.

As of the petition date, the Debtor owed Hexner $75,000 on the
secured loan. Interest had not yet accrued but is due at the rate
of 7% per annum when the Promissory Note matures in 1 year, along
with any attorneys' fees and costs that may be owed to Hexner at
that time.

The Debtor needs to maintain its ordinary business operations while
in chapter 11 pending confirmation of a plan of reorganization.
Accordingly, the Debtor and Hexner have entered into a Stipulation
for the use of the cash collateral in the ordinary course of
business.

As adequate protection for the use of Hexner's cash collateral, the
Debtor will make monthly adequate protection payments to Hexner of
$437.50 by the 25th day of each month, which amounts to the
post-petition accrued monthly interest on the Hexner Loan under the
terms of the Stipulation.

Hexner will also be entitled to receive a replacement lien on the
proceeds of the collateral to the extent that the Adequate
Protection Payments and the value of the collateral pledged proves
inadequate as measured by a decline from liquidation value of
Hexner's collateral as of the filing date. The replacement lien
will attach only to the collateral of the kind and character to
which Hexner's liens would have attached pre-petition and will
attach to such assets only to the extent that Cash Collateral is
used. Said replacement lien will be subordinate to the compensation
and expenses (excluding professional fees), of any subsequently
appointed trustee in the bankruptcy case and quarterly fees
required to be paid pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1930(a)(6).

Hexner has also agreed to a carve-out for professional fees for the
professionals approved and appointed in this bankruptcy case, which
includes counsel for a Creditors' Committee should one be
appointed.

To the extent that the replacement lien proves to be inadequate,
Hexner will be granted a super priority claim under 11 U.S.C.
Section 507(b) to the extent that adequate protection proves
inadequate as defined by shortfall in payment of Hexner's secured
claim against the Debtor capped by a decline in the liquidation
value of Hexner's collateral from the date of commencement of the
bankruptcy case to the date of payment. Until such time as Hexner
is paid in full on his secured claim, Hexner will also continue to
retain his existing security.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb18-51662-4.pdf

                    About Clickaway Corporation

Clickaway Corporation, a computer repair, service, sales and
networking company, has been headquartered in Campbell and serving
more than 50,000 customers in Bay Area since 2002.  The Debtor
filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No.
18-51662) on July 27, 2018, estimating $1 million to $10 million in
assets and liabilities. The Law Offices of Binder and Malter, led
by its partner Michael W. Malter, serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.


COLOR SPOT: Intends to File Plan Pursuant to PSA Timeline
---------------------------------------------------------
Color Spot Holdings, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to extend the
Exclusive Periods for the filing of a chapter 11 plan and
solicitation of acceptances thereof through and including December
26, 2018 and February 25, 2019, respectively.

On September 26, 2018 AT 10:00 a.m., the Court will hold a hearing
to consider extending the Debtors' Exclusivity Periods. Any
objections or responses to the requested extension must be filed on
or before September 14.

Pursuant to the Sale Order, the Debtors were authorized to enter
into that certain Asset Purchase Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association. The sale to the Buyer closed on August 17,
2018.

In connection with entering into the amended and restated Purchase
Agreement effective as of August 3, 2018, the Debtors and Wells
Fargo entered into a Plan Support Agreement ("PSA") pursuant to
which Wells Fargo, in its capacity as secured lender and Buyer,
agreed to support a chapter 11 plan of liquidation, including
consenting to the usage of cash collateral to fund expenses, and
payment of administrative and priority claims, required to confirm
a chapter 11 plan.

The PSA contemplates that the Debtors will file a chapter 11 plan
of liquidation by September 20, 2018 and will obtain confirmation
of the plan by Dec. 31, 2018.

Following the closing of the Sale, the Debtors have begun the
process of winding down their estates, including through the
reconciliation of claims against the estates and preparation for
the formulation of a liquidating plan. The Debtors anticipate
filing a plan and pursuing confirmation of that plan on the
timeline set forth in the PSA.

Given the results of the Sale process and the fact that the Debtors
have de minimis (if any) unencumbered assets with which to propose
a plan, the Debtors believe that the plan contemplated by the term
sheet under the PSA is likely the only feasible plan, and the
Debtors intend to pursue that plan with Wells Fargo's support.

Thus, the Debtors assert that terminating the Exclusive Period
would only serve to foster a chaotic environment and only add the
opportunity for parties to engage in mischievous and
counterproductive behavior in pursuit of alternatives that are
simply not feasible under the circumstances of these chapter 11
cases.

                         About Color Spot

Color Spot Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, owns and
operates nurseries.  It was incorporated in 2007 and is based in
Fallbrook, California.

Color Spot Holdings and its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 18-11272) on May 29, 2018.  In the
petitions signed by CEO Paul Russo, the Debtors estimated $50
million to $100 million in assets and $100 million to $500 million
in liabilities.

Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein presides over the Debtors' cases.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP as their
counsel; Raymond James & Associates, Inc., as investment banker;
and Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, Inc., as claims and noticing agent
and administrative services advisor.


CONDO 64: Unsecured Creditors to be Paid 16% Under Exit Plan
------------------------------------------------------------
Unsecured creditors of Condo 64, LLC, will be paid 16% of their
claims under the company's proposed plan to exit Chapter 11
protection.

Under the proposed plan of reorganization, creditors holding
allowed Class 4 general unsecured claims will receive their pro
rata share of the sum of $2,000 but will have the right to
distributions from any future Chapter 5 recoveries.

The estimated amount of allowed Class 4 general unsecured claims is
$15,000, exclusive of American Eagle's deficiency claims.

On the effective date of the plan, Condo 64 will close on a bridge
loan with Elohim Financial Corporation in the amount of $2.2
million.  This exit financing will provide the funds necessary for
distributions under the plan, according to the company's disclosure
statement filed on August 23 with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Connecticut.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb15-21797-372.pdf

                        About Condo 64 LLC

Condo 64, LLC, a single asset real estate under 11 U.S.C. Sec.
101(51B), is the owner of 67 of the 112 condominium units and the
leases and rents in connection therewith at the location known as
505-509 Burnside Avenue, East Hartford, Connecticut.

Condo 64 filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No.
15-21797) on Oct. 16, 2015.  In the petition signed by Managing
Member Oliver C. Pinkard, the Debtor disclosed total assets at $4.6
million and total liabilities at $3.1 million at the time of the
filing.

The case is assigned to Judge Ann M. Nevins.

The Debtor hired Kaitlin M. Humble, Esq., and Craig I. Lifland,
Esq., at Halloran & Sage LLP, as bankruptcy counsel; and MAC
Commercial Financing Inc. as mortgage broker.

No trustee, examiner or creditors' committee has been appointed in
the case.


CYTORI THERAPEUTICS: Fails to Comply with Nasdaq Listing Rule
-------------------------------------------------------------
Cytori Therapeutics, Inc., received a letter from the Listing
Qualifications staff of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC on Aug. 28,
2018, indicating that, based upon the closing bid price of the
Company's common stock for the last 30 consecutive business days,
the Company no longer meets the requirement to maintain a minimum
bid price of $1 per share, as set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule
5550(a)(2).

In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), the Company
has been provided a period of 180 calendar days, or until Feb. 25,
2019, in which to regain compliance.  In order to regain compliance
with the minimum bid price requirement, the closing bid price of
the Company's common stock must be at least $1 per share for a
minimum of ten consecutive business days during this 180-day
period.  In the event that the Company does not regain compliance
within this 180-day period, the Company may be eligible to seek an
additional compliance period of 180 calendar days if it meets the
continued listing requirement for market value of publicly held
shares and all other initial listing standards for the Nasdaq
Capital Market, with the exception of the bid price requirement,
and provides written notice to Nasdaq of its intent to cure the
deficiency during this second compliance period, by effecting a
reverse stock split, if necessary.  However, if it appears to the
Nasdaq Staff that the Company will not be able to cure the
deficiency, or if the Company is otherwise not eligible, Nasdaq
will provide notice to the Company that its common stock will be
subject to delisting.

The Notice does not result in the immediate delisting of the
Company's common stock from the Nasdaq Capital Market.  The Company
intends to monitor the closing bid price of the Company's common
stock to allow a reasonable period for the price to rebound from
its recent decline but will continue to consider its available
options to regain compliance.  There can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to regain compliance with the minimum bid
price requirement or maintain compliance with the other listing
requirements.

                         About Cytori

Based in San Diego, California, Cytori -- http://www.cytori.com/--
is developing, manufacturing, and commercializing
nanoparticle-delivered oncology drugs and autologous
adipose-derived regenerative cell (ADRC) therapies within its
Nanomedicine and Cell Therapy franchises, respectively.  Cytori
Nanomedicine is focused on the liposomal encapsulation of
anti-neoplastic chemotherapy agents, which may enable the effective
delivery of the agents to target sites while reducing systemic
toxicity.  The Cytori Nanomedicine product pipeline consists of
ATI-0918  pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride for breast
cancer, ovarian cancer, multiple myeloma, and Kaposi's sarcoma, a
complex/hybrid generic drug, and ATI-1123 patented
albumin-stabilized pegylated liposomal docetaxel for multiple solid
tumors.  Cytori Cell Therapy, prepared within several hours with
the proprietary Celution System and administered to the patient the
same day, has been shown in preclinical and clinical studies to act
principally by improving blood flow, modulating the immune system,
and facilitating wound repair.  As a result, Cytori Cell Therapy
may provide benefits across multiple disease states and can be made
available to the physician and patient at the point-of-care.

Cytori reported a net loss of $22.68 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of $22.04 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Cytori had $22.67
million in total assets, $17.92 million in total liabilities and
$4.75 million in total stockholders' equity.

The audit report of the Company's independent registered public
accounting firm BDO USA, LLP, in San Diego, California, covering
the Dec. 31, 2017 consolidated financial statements contains an
explanatory paragraph that states that the Company's recurring
losses from operations, liquidity position, and debt service
requirements raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern.


DIFFUSION PHARMACEUTICALS: Obtains Deadline Extension From Nasdaq
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Diffusion Pharmaceuticals Inc. has received a written notice from
the staff of the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq
Stock Market, LLC relating to the minimum bid price requirement
contained in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2).  As previously
disclosed, on March 2, 2018 the Company received a written notice
from the Staff indicating that the Company was not in compliance
with the Rule because the bid price for the Company's common stock
had closed below $1.00 per share for the previous 30 consecutive
business days.  In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule
5810(c)(3)(A), the Company was provided 180 calendar days, or until
Aug. 29, 2018, to regain compliance with the Rule.

The Notice provided that, although the Company had not regained
compliance with the Rule by Aug. 29, 2018, in accordance with
Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(F), the Staff has determined that
the Company is eligible for an additional 180 calendar days from
the date of the Notice, or until Feb. 25, 2019, to regain
compliance with the Rule.  To regain compliance, the bid price for
the Company's common stock must close at $1.00 per share or more
for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days.

The Notice has no effect on the listing or trading of the Company's
common stock at this time, and the Company is currently evaluating
its alternatives to resolve this listing deficiency.  As previously
announced, at the Company's 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on
June 14, 2018, the Company's stockholders approved an amendment to
the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, to effect a
reverse stock split of the shares of the Company's common stock,
par value $0.001 per share, at a ratio of not less than one-to-two
and not greater than one-to-fifteen, with the exact ratio and
effective time of the reverse stock split to be determined by the
Company's Board of Directors, if at all.

                  About Diffusion Pharmaceuticals

Based in Charlottesville, Virginia, Diffusion Pharmaceuticals Inc.
-- http://www.diffusionpharma.com-- is a clinical-stage
biotechnology company focused on extending the life expectancy of
cancer patients by improving the effectiveness of current
standard-of-care treatments including radiation therapy and
chemotherapy.  Diffusion is developing its lead product candidate,
trans sodium crocetinate (TSC), for use in the many cancers where
tumor hypoxia (oxygen deprivation) is known to diminish the
effectiveness of SOC treatments.  TSC targets the cancer's hypoxic
micro-environment, re-oxygenating treatment-resistant tissue and
making the cancer cells more vulnerable to the therapeutic effects
of SOC treatments without the apparent occurrence of any serious
side effects.

Diffusion incurred a net loss attributable to common stockholders
of $2.61 million in 2017 compared to a net loss attributable to
common stockholders of $18.03 million in 2016.  As of June 30,
2018, Diffusion had $29.94 million in total assets, $2.64 million
in total liabilities and $27.30 million in total stockholders'
equity.


DON FRAME TRUCKING: May Use Up To $25,725 in Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Cark L. Bucki of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of New York authorized Don Frame Trucking, Inc. to use
cash collateral in the amount of up to $25,725 consistent with the
budget.

No further hearing will be scheduled on the Cash Collateral Motion,
so long as the Debtor provides Appearing Parties with future four
week cash needs budgets at least seven days prior to the
commencement of each of the following four-week periods, and
provided no objection is raised by any of the Appearing Parties to
the four-week cash needs budgets: (a) Sept. 20, 2018 for the
four-week period commencing Sept. 27, 2018; and (b) Oct. 4, 2018
for the four-week period starting October 18.

A copy of the Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ncmb18-11147-88.pdf

                     About Don Frame Trucking

Don Frame Trucking, Inc., is a trucking company in Fredonia, New
York specializing in the transport of dry bulk commodities,
construction and hazardous materials.

Don Frame Trucking filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D.N.Y.
Case No. 18-11147) on June 13, 2018.  In the petition signed by
John D. Frame, vice president/treasurer, the Debtor estimated $1
million to $10 million in assets and liabilities.  The Hon. Carl L.
Bucki presides over the case.  Gross Shuman P.C., led by Robert J.
Feldman, serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.  Woods Oviatt
Gilman LLP, is the special counsel.


EVOLUTION ACADEMY: S&P Alters Outlook to Pos. & Affirms B- Rating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook to positive from stable and
affirmed its 'B-' long-term rating on Texas Public Finance
Authority Charter School Finance Corp. 's series 2010A and B
education revenue bonds and series 2010Q taxable education revenue
bonds (qualified school construction bonds--direct pay), all issued
for Evolution Academy Charter School.

"The positive outlook reflects Evolution Academy's improving
operating performance, which resulted in close to break-even
results in fiscal 2017, rising maximum annual debt service
coverage, and a moderate increase in liquidity," said S&P Global
Ratings credit analyst Luke Gildner.

If these improvements continue, an upgrade is likely within the
one-year outlook period.  

The 'B-' rating further reflects S&P's view of Evolution's:

-- Very low liquidity of 17.7 days' cash on hand based on fiscal
2017 financial statements, which is improved from 10.8 days at
fiscal 2016 year-end;

-- Below-expected enrollment levels at the organization's
Richardson campus resulting from changes in Texas legislation that
S&P understands have suppressed Truancy Court-assigned students;

-- Relatively high student turnover and low retention rates
resulting from servicing the school's target demographic of at-risk
students; and,

-- Risk of charter revocation or nonrenewal prior to the bonds'
maturity, which is shared by all charters operating in the state.

Partly mitigating the preceding credit factors, in S&P's view, are
Evolution's:

-- Solid growth in enrollment at the organization's Houston
campus, which partially mitigates pressures seen at the Richardson
campus;

-- Recently improved operating performance resulting in close to
break-even margins and good debt service coverage (DSC) for the
rating; and,

-- Good 345-student waiting list, which S&P believes could provide
a base for future enrollment growth.

S&P said, "The positive outlook reflects our view that the school's
improved operating performance will likely continue through at
least fiscal 2018, resulting in operating margins and DSC levels
that are commensurate with a higher rating. It also reflects our
expectation that management will not undertake additional growth
plans. Furthermore, we believe liquidity could increase moderately
over the next few years if operations meet expectations.

"We could raise the rating if management can maintain maximum
annual debt service coverage near current levels while increasing
operating liquidity to levels commensurate with a higher rating. We
would also view positively stabilization in enrollment at
Evolution's Richardson campus.

"We could lower the rating or return the outlook to stable during
the one-year outlook period if management has problems managing
operating liquidity. In addition, any declines in enrollment or
weakening of operating performance could lead to a negative rating
action."


FIRST AVE.: Unsecureds Estimated to Recover 65% of Allowed Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------------
First Avenue Wine Merchants, Inc., filed a small business
disclosure statement in support of its chapter 11 plan dated August
25, 2018.

General unsecured creditors are classified in Class 3 and will
receive a distribution estimated at 65% of the allowed claims to be
distributed in full following approval of the plan and the
effective date thereof presuming the priority tax claim settlements
push through. But if the settlements are not made, the unsecured
creditors will receive less than 50%. The amount of the
recovery/distribution of general unsecured creditors will depend on
the settlement of the priority tax of the I.R.S. N.Y.S/, N.Y.C.

Payments and distributions under the plan will be funded by the
sale of the Debtor's business which took place on August 23, 2018.
Approximately $340,749 is the cash on hand balance available to
unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb18-10147-73.pdf

           About First Avenue Wine Merchants

First Avenue Wine Merchants, Inc., is engaged in the business of
operating a retail store for the sale of wines and liquors located
at located at 383 First Avenue, New York, New York.  First Avenue
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-10147) on
Jan. 22, 2018.  Paul D. Feinstein, P.C., is counsel to the Debtor.


FIRST CHICAGO: A.M. Best Raises LongTerm Issuer Credit Rating to b+
-------------------------------------------------------------------
A.M. Best has upgraded the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating
(Long-Term ICR) to "b+" from "b" and affirmed the Financial
Strength Rating (FSR) of C++ (Marginal) of First Chicago Insurance
Company (FCIC). The outlook of the FSR has been revised to positive
from stable, while the Long-Term ICR remains positive.
Concurrently, A.M. Best has upgraded the FSR to C (Weak) from C-
(Weak) and the Long-Term ICR to "ccc" from "cc" of United Security
Health and Casualty Company (USH&C), a wholly owned subsidiary of
FCIC. The outlook for the Long-Term ICR rating has been revised to
positive from stable, while the outlook for the FSR remains stable.
Both companies are domiciled in Bedford Park, IL.

The Credit Ratings (ratings) of FCIC reflect its balance sheet
strength, which A.M. Best categorizes as weak, as well as its
adequate operating performance, limited business profile and
marginal enterprise risk management.

The rating upgrades reflect the FCIC's improved operating
performance, based on the consolidated financial results of the two
companies, which has resulted in favorable pre-tax operating gains,
positive net income and surplus increases for five consecutive
years. These favorable operating metrics mainly are due to a
consistent stream of net investment income, other fee income, and
to a lesser extent, improved underwriting results. As a result, the
FCIC's five-year average combined and operating ratios outperform
the private passenger non-standard automobile composite. The
positive outlook on FCIC's ratings anticipates the company's
continued favorable operating performance and improved overall
risk-adjusted capitalization.

Partially offsetting these positive rating factors is the FCIC's
significantly elevated underwriting leverage and expense ratios,
which compare unfavorably with the composite. Despite adding to
surplus for five consecutive years, FCIC continues to grow its
direct and net premiums written. As a result, its net and gross
underwriting leverage ratios remain well above the composite
averages. In addition, elevated underwriting expenses driven by
commissions and other expenses dampen overall profitability.
Furthermore, FCIC has a geographic concentration of risk, as nearly
86% of direct premium written is in two states, Illinois and
Indiana, and a narrow product offering as 89% of direct premium
written in three lines of business: private passenger auto
liability, commercial auto and auto physical damage.

The ratings of USH&C reflect its balance sheet strength, which A.M.
Best categorizes as weak, as well as its weak operating
performance, very limited business profile and marginal enterprise
risk management. These assessments reflect the company slowly
transitioning from a life/health entity to a health and
property/casualty entity.

These rating upgrades mainly reflect an additional capital
contribution of $2.5 million made in 2017.

Partially offsetting this positive rating factor is the inherent
execution risk in management's ability to execute successfully the
business plan to a property/casualty writer. This execution risk is
somewhat mitigated as the management of FCIC, USH&C's parent
company, is experienced and has a history of operating in the
property/casualty industry. The positive outlook on the Long-Term
ICR is based on A.M. Bess expectation that the company will meet
its projections for premium growth and operating profitability in
2018.


FIRSTENERGY SOLUTIONS: To Retire Four Major Power Plants
--------------------------------------------------------
FirstEnergy Solutions Corp. (FES) on Aug. 29, 2018, notified PJM
Interconnection, LLC (PJM), the regional transmission organization,
of its plans to deactivate four fossil-fuel generating plants in
2021 and 2022.

FES is closing the plants due to a market environment that fails to
adequately compensate generators for the resiliency and
fuel-security attributes that the plants provide.

The plants, representing a total of 4,017 megawatts (MW) of
generating capacity, are to be deactivated on the following
schedule:

  * Eastlake 6, Eastlake, Ohio (24 MW, coal), June 1, 2021

  * Bruce Mansfield Units 1-3, Shippingport, Penn. (2,490 MW,
coal), June 1, 2021

  * W.H. Sammis Diesel, Stratton, Ohio (13 MW, diesel oil), June 1,
2021

  * W.H. Sammis Units 5-7, Stratton, Ohio (1,490 MW, coal), June 1,
2022

In the interim, the plants will continue normal operations.

Plant closures are subject to review by PJM. If PJM determines that
one or more of these units may be needed for grid reliability
purposes, FES will provide information and estimates of the costs
and timing to keep some or all of the units open.

FES filed requests for exemption from PJM's "must-offer" rules both
for these fossil-fired plants and for FES's three nuclear
generating plants, whose planned deactivations were announced March
28, 2018.

Under the must-offer rules, generating companies in the PJM region
are required to make their plants' capacity available to the grid
in regular capacity auctions unless granted an exception. The
annual auctions are held to secure capacity three years in advance.
FES is seeking exemptions from auctions covering the 2022-23
delivery year and beyond.

The FES nuclear plants and their deactivation dates are:

  * Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Oak Harbor, Ohio (908 MW),
May 2020

  * Beaver Valley Power Station, Shippingport, Penn., Unit 1 (939
MW) May 2021 and Unit 2 (933 MW) October 2021

  * Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Perry, Ohio (1,281 MW), May 2021

"Our decision to retire the fossil-fueled plants was every bit as
difficult as the one we made five months ago to deactivate our
nuclear assets," said Don Moul, President of FES Generation
Companies and Chief Nuclear Officer.  "The action in no way
reflects on the dedication and work ethic of our employees, nor on
the strong support shown by their union leaders and the communities
where the plants are located."

"As with nuclear, our fossil-fueled plants face the insurmountable
challenge of a market that does not sufficiently value their
contribution to the security and flexibility of our power system,"
Moul said, adding: "The market fails to recognize, for example, the
on-site fuel storage capability of coal, which increases the
resilience of the grid."

The federal government is currently considering policy measures
that would support fossil and nuclear generating facilities
considered at risk in the current market environment, but vital to
grid security and reliability. Depending on the timing of any
federal policy action, deactivation decisions could be reversed or
postponed.

                    About FirstEnergy Solutions

Akron, Ohio-based FirstEnergy Solutions, Corp. (FES) is a
subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp (NYSE:FE).  FES --
http://www.firstenergycorp.com/-- provides energy-related products
and services to retail and wholesale customers; and owns and
operates 5,381 MWs of fossil generating capacity through its
FirstEnergy Generation subsidiaries.  FES also owns 4,048 MWs of
nuclear generating capacity through its FirstEnergy Nuclear
Generation subsidiary.  Nuclear generating plants are operated by
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC), which is a separate
subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp.

On March 31, 2018, FirstEnergy Solutions and 6 affiliates,
including FENOC, each filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ohio
Lead Case No. 18-50757).  The cases are pending before the
Honorable Judge Alan M. Koschik and the Debtors have requested that
their cases be jointly administered under Case No. 18-50757.

Parent company, First Energy Corp. and its other subsidiaries,
including its regulated subsidiaries, are not part of the filing
and will not be subject to the Chapter 11 process.  First Energy
Corp. listed $42.2 billion in total assets against $4.07 billion in
total current liabilities, $21.1 billion in long-term debt and
other long-term obligations and $13.1 billion in non-current
liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2017.

The Debtors tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; Brouse McDowell LPA as co-counsel; Lazard Freres & Co. as
investment banker; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC as
restructuring advisor and Charles Moore as chief restructuring
officer; and Prime Clerk as claims and noticing agent.  The Debtors
also tapped Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP as special counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 9 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on April 12, 2018.  Milbank, Tweed, Hadley &
McCloy LLP and Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP serve as counsel to the
committee.



GASTAR EXPLORATION: Gets Noncompliance Notice from NYSE American
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gastar Exploration Inc. received on Aug. 28, 2018 a deficiency
letter from the NYSE American Stock Exchange informing the Company
of its non-compliance with continued listing standards because the
Company's common stock has been selling for a low price per share
for a substantial period of time.  The NYSE American staff
determined that the Company's continued listing on the Exchange is
predicated on it effecting a reverse stock split of its common
stock or otherwise demonstrating sustained price improvement within
a reasonable period of time, which the staff determined to be no
later than Feb. 28, 2019.

As previously reported, the Company is working closely with its
financial and legal advisors to consider potential strategic
transactions including financing, refinancing, sale or merger
transactions, and is encouraging proposals from existing
stakeholders and interested third-parties.  The Company will
accordingly consider measures that are in the best interests of the
Company and its stockholders, but no decision has been made at this
time with respect to specific measures regarding the continued
listing of the Company's stock on the NYSE American.  If the
Company is unable to regain compliance, the NYSE American will
initiate procedures to suspend and delist the Company's common
stock, 8.625% Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock and 10.75% Series
B Cumulative Preferred Stock.  In the interim, the Company's common
stock and two series of preferred stock will continue to be listed
on the NYSE American subject to the Company's compliance with other
continued listing requirements and subject to the trading price
remaining above $0.06 per share.  The Company's common stock will
continue to trade on the NYSE American under the symbol "GST," but
will have an added designation of ".BC" to indicate that the
Company is below compliance with the listing standards set forth in
the Company Guide.  The NYSE American notification of continued
listing deficiency does not affect the Company's business
operations or its reporting obligations under the Securities and
Exchange Commission regulations.

The Company has also been informally notified by the NYSE American
staff that if the trading price of the Company's common stock
trades at or below $0.06 per share, then the Company's common and
preferred stock will be automatically suspended from further
trading on the NYSE American.  If the Company's preferred and
common stock is suspended from the NYSE American, the Company
expects that the securities would be quoted on the OTCQB
over-the-counter market under different symbols on the following
trading day.  Such a suspension of trading would also accelerate
the delisting process with respect to the Company's securities.

A delisting of the Company's common stock would constitute a
"fundamental change" under the terms of the indenture governing the
Company's Convertible Notes due 2022, which would permit the
noteholders to require the Company to repurchase all or part of
such holder's notes on a date specified by the Company that is not
less than 20 nor more than 35 calendar days after the date a
fundamental change repurchase notice is sent (which is required to
be sent within 20 calendar days of the fundamental change event) at
a repurchase price, payable in cash, equal to 101% of the principal
amount of the Convertible Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and
unpaid interest to, but excluding, the Fundamental Change
Repurchase Date.  The failure to redeem the Convertible Notes on
the Fundamental Change Repurchase Date would constitute an event of
default under the Indenture and result in the automatic
acceleration of the maturity date of the Convertible Notes.
Furthermore, upon the occurrence of an event of default under the
Indenture, Ares Management LLC and its affiliates, as holders of a
majority in principal amount of the Company's term loan, or any
transferee holder of a majority in principal amount of the
Company's term loan, would have the right to immediately accelerate
the maturity of the term loan.

                    About Gastar Exploration

Houston, Texas-based Gastar Exploration Inc. --
http://www.gastar.com/-- is a pure play Mid-Continent independent
energy company engaged in the exploration, development and
production of oil, condensate, natural gas and natural gas liquids.
Gastar's principal business activities include the identification,
acquisition and subsequent exploration and development of oil and
natural gas properties with an emphasis on unconventional reserves,
such as shale resource plays.  Gastar holds a concentrated acreage
position in what is believed to be the core of the STACK Play, an
area of central Oklahoma which is home to multiple oil and natural
gas-rich reservoirs including the Meramec, Oswego, Osage, Woodford
and Hunton formations.

Gastar Exploration reported a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $61.22 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$103.53 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of June 30,
2018, Gastar Exploration had $339.20 million in total assets,
$434.48 million in total current and longj-term liabilities and a
total stockholders' deficit of $95.28 million.

                          *     *     *

In March 2017, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'CCC-' corporate
credit rating, with a negative outlook, on Gastar Exploration.
Subsequently, S&P withdrew all its ratings on Gastar at the
issuer's request.

In April 2017, Moody's Investors Service withdrew all assigned
ratings for Gastar Exploration, including the 'Caa3' Corporate
Family Rating, following the elimination of all of its rated debt.


GMD SERVICES: Seeks Jan. 2, 2019 Plan Filing Period Extension
-------------------------------------------------------------
GMD Services, LLC requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Kansas for an extension of the time to file Chapter 11
Plan and Disclosure Statement until January 2, 2019.

Absent the requested extension, the Debtor's exclusivity period for
filing a Chapter 11 Plan expires September 4, 2018.

The Debtor claims that it is still in the process of negotiating
with creditors and formulating the terms of the plan. In order to
formulate a Chapter 11 Plan, the Debtor needs to know the various
positions of the creditors. Accordingly, the Debtor requests an
extension of time for filing the Chapter 11 Plan and Disclosure
Statement to allow time for the tax returns to be finalized and
filed.

The Debtor represents that it is current with adequate protection
payments and U.S. Trustee fees.

                      About GMD Services

GMD Services, LLC, is a fiber and utility installer with a location
at 17140 US 169 Highway, Olathe, KS.  GMD Services sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kan.
Case No. 18-20374) on March 6, 2018.  At the time of the filing,
the Debtor estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities
of $1,000,000 to $10 million.  

Judge Robert D. Berger presides over the case.  

Colin N. Gotham of Evans & Mullinix, P.A., is the Debtor's counsel.
JHC Accounting is the accountant.


GUMP'S HOLDINGS: Sets Bidding Procedures for IP Assets
------------------------------------------------------
Gump's Holdings, LLC, Gump's Corp., and Gump's By Mail, Inc., ask
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada to authorize
the bidding procedures with respect to the sale of their
intellectual property assets at auction.

The Debtors are in the midst of liquidating their assets and
closing their businesses.  Thus, they no longer need their IP
Assets.  Moreover, as their operations wind down, their
relationship with their customers becomes less valuable.  A sale of
the IP Assets on an accelerated basis will monetize the estates'
assets for the benefit of creditors while they continue to have
significant value.  Accordingly, the Debtors have determined that
the sale of their IP Assets in accordance with the procedures
described will maximize recoveries for their creditors and is,
therefore, in the best interests of the Debtors, their estates, and
creditors.

Through Gordon Brothers Retail Partners, LLC ("Agent"), the Debtors
are now in the process of liquidating their tangible assets through
the Closing Sale.  Upon completion of the Closing Sale, they'll no
longer have any continuing retail operations and will no longer
require use of the IP Assets.  Accordingly, they've determined that
it is in the best interests of the estates to conduct the sale of
the IP Assets, which include the following:

     (i) All trademarks, service marks, trade names, service names,
brand names, all trade dress rights, logos, internet domain names
and corporate names and general intangibles of a like nature,
together with the goodwill associated with any of the foregoing,
and all applications, registrations and renewals thereof,
including, without limitation, any marks and names set forth on
Exhibit 1, which the Debtors believe are owned by one or more of
the Debtors;

     (ii) IP addresses allocated to the Debtors;

     (iii) Copyrights and copyright licenses;

     (iv) Any claims or causes of action arising out of or related
to any infringement, dilution, misappropriation or other violation
of any of the foregoing;
     
     (v) To the extent maintained by the Debtors and subject to
compliance with the Debtors' published privacy policy, membership
lists, gift registries, customer databases, including contact
information and email addresses and other purchasing history and
related information; and

     (vi) Any property necessary for the transfer to and/or the
operation by a buyer of any of the foregoing, subject to the
Debtors’ or Agent’s rights, as applicable, to continued use, if
necessary.

The Debtors are asking to sell the IP Assets at an auction in whole
to a single bidder or in part to multiple bidders, with each
Winning Bidder for the relevant IP Assets.  In addition, in
connection with the Sale, depending on the Winning Bidder(s) and
the IP Assets sold, it may be necessary to assume and assign
certain related executory contracts to the Winning Bidder(s).
Accordingly, the Motion asks authority, but not direction, to
assume and assign the IP Agreements in connection with any sale of
the IP Assets.

The Debtors are parties to three secured loan agreements in which
Retail and Direct are borrowers and Holdings is a guarantor.  The
first lien is held by Sterling Business Credit, LLC pursuant to the
Loan and Security Agreement, for a revolving credit facility of up
to $15 million dated Dec. 29, 2015.  As of the close of business on
Aug. 3, 2018, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the
Prepetition Loan Agreement was $5,752,649.

As security for payment and performance of the Retail and Direct's
obligations under the Prepetition Loan Agreement, Sterling has a
security interest and lien on substantially all of the current and
future assets of Retail and Direct.  Among other things, the
Borrower Collateral includes general intangibles, trademarks, trade
names, business names, service marks, logos, and certain related
intellectual property, copyrights, copyright licenses, domain
names, and proceeds from any of the foregoing, subject to certain
exceptions and permitted liens.

Retail and Direct also granted a security interest in trademarks,
trade names, business names, service marks, logos, and certain
related intellectual property to Seaker & Sons, a California
limited partnership to secure their obligations under the Lease
Agreement dated Feb. 10, 1994 pursuant to the Trademark Security
Agreement dated as of Oct. 14, 2009.  The Post Street Landlord,
Sterling, and Debtors are parties to the Subordination and
Intercreditor Agreement dated as of Dec. 29, 2015, pursuant to
which the Post Street Landlord agreed to subordinate its lien to
the liens of Sterling.

Retail and Direct, as borrowers, Holdings, as guarantor, and
Corporate Partners II Limited are parties to a Secured Promissory
Note dated May 24, 2012, as amended Sept. 12, 2012, Jan. 10, 2014,
Nov. 25, 2014, May 1, 2015, and July 1, 2016 by the Fifth Amendment
to Secured Promissory Note, in the principal amount of $5.2
million.  The Junior Note grants a security interest in all or
substantially all of the assets of Retail and Direct, inclusive of
general intangibles and intellectual property, while the Secured
Guaranty of Holdings grants a security interest in all or
substantially all of the assets of Holdings.  The Junior Note is
subordinate to the Prepetition Loan Obligations to Sterling
pursuant to the Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement dated as
of Dec. 29, 2015 and is subordinate to the lien granted to the Post
Street Landlord in the Trademark Security Agreement.  The Junior
Note bears interest at 14% and matures July 31, 2021.  As of the
Petition Date, the balance due on the Junior Note was approximately
$9,634,000.

Retail and Direct, as borrowers, obtained an additional loan from
Methuselah Capital Partners, L.P., an affiliate of director John
Chachas, in the principal amount of $250,000 pursuant to that
certain Secured Promissory Note dated July 21, 2017, having a
maturity date of July 31, 2021.  The Methuselah Note grants a
security interest on substantially all assets of the borrowers and
is guaranteed by Holdings.  Methuselah and Sterling are parties to
a Subordination Agreement dated as of July 13, 2017, with terms
substantially similar to the Corporate Partners Subordination.
Further, like the lien of Corporate Partners, Methuselah’s lien
is subordinate to the lien granted to the Post Street Landlord in
the Trademark Security Agreement.  The Methuselah Note bears
interest at 14% per annum, and the principal and interest due, as
of Aug. 3, 2018, was approximately $289,000.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Sept. 19, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. (PT)

     b. Initial Bid: All Bids submitted must state the total
proposed purchase price, in U.S. dollars, including any cash to be
paid and any liabilities to be assumed, identify the specific IP
Assets to be purchased in the Bid, if appropriate, and not be
subject to any further due diligence condition or financing
contingencies.

     c. Deposit: 10% of the Purchase Price

     d. Stalking Horse: Based on the Bids received by Sept. 5,
2018, the Debtors may designate one or more Stalking Horse Bidder
setting a floor for subsequent Bids.  In the event a Qualified
Bidder is designated as a Stalking Horse Bidder, the Debtors may
provide bid protections to the Stalking Horse Bidder in the form of
an initial Bid Increment in the amount of $150,000, and, subject to
the consent of Sterling, if the Stalking Horse Bidder is not the
Winning Bidder, the Stalking Horse Bidder's reasonable, documented
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with submission of
its Qualified Bid, subject to a $75,000 cap.  The Debtors will be
authorized to approve joint Bids on a case by case basis.

     e. Notice of Qualified Bids: Following the Bid Deadline on
Sept. 19, 2018, the Debtors will file with the Court the Notice of
Qualified Bids, which will identify the terms of the Qualified Bids
(including any Stalking Horse Bid), along with a description of the
Qualified Bidder(s), and a list of the IP Agreements, if any,
proposed to be assumed and assigned to the Qualified Bidder(s).

     f. Auction: The Debtors ask that the Court schedules an
auction and Sale Hearing on Sept. 25, 2018, such that sale(s) of
the IP Assets can occur by Sept. 30, 2018 pursuant to the terms of
the Interim DIP Order.

     g. Bid Increments: The minimum interval for bidding at the
auction will be determined by the Debtors.

     h. If, at any time prior to Sept. 30, 2018, the Winning Bidder
cannot consummate the Winning Bid, the Debtors may choose to close
with the Back-Up Bidder by accepting the Back-Up Bid for the
relevant IP Asset(s).

The Debtors ask approval to sell the IP Assets on a final "as is"
basis, free and clear of any liens, claims, and encumbrances.  In
connection with the sale of the IP Assets, they anticipate that the
Winning Bidder(s) will have the right to require them to reject,
or, alternatively, assume and assign to the Winning Bidder(s) the
IP Agreements.  

Pursuant to Section 365(b) and (f), they ask that the Court
approves the form of the Cure Amount Notice at the hearing on Bid
Procedures.  No later than two days following entry of the Bid
Procedures Order, the Debtors will file the Cure Amount Notice.  

Under the facts and circumstances of these cases, including
Sterling's requirement that the IP Sale occur by Sept. 30, 2018,
the Debtors ask that any order approving the Sale and any
assumption and assignment of any IP Agreements waive the 14-day
stays under Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d) and be effective
immediately upon entry.

A copy of the Exhibit 1 attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/GUMPS_HOLDINGS_90_Sales.pdf  

                     About Gump's Holdings

Gump's Holdings, LLC -- http://www.gumps.com/-- operates as a
holding company.  The company, through its subsidiaries, sells
furniture, lighting, rugs, linens, apparel and jewelry.

Gump's Holdings, Gump's Corp. and Gump's By Mail, Inc. sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev.
Case Nos. 18-14683 to 18-14685) on Aug. 3, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Tony Lopez, CFO and chief operating
officer, the Debtor disclosed these assets and liabilities:

                                   Assets     Liabilities
                               ------------   ------------
   Gump's Holdings, LLC            $47,031    $16,456,335
   Gump's Corp.                 $9,812,318    $23,713,258
   Gump's By Mail, Inc.         $4,198,319    $23,755,942

The Debtors tapped Garman Turner Gordon LLP as counsel, and Lincoln
Partners Advisors LLC as financial advisor.  Donlin, Recano &
Company Inc. is the claims and notice agent.


H N HINCKLEY: Sept. 20 Continued Cash Collateral Hearing
--------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Joan N. Feeney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts, with the consent of Martha's Vineyard
Savings Bank, has authorized H N Hinckley & Sons, Inc.'s further
use of cash collateral pending further order of the Court.

A continued hearing will be held on Sept. 20, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.
The Court will also hold a Chapter 11 status conference on Sept.
20, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.

A copy of the Order is available at

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/mab18-10398-116.pdf

                     About H N Hinckley & Sons

H N Hinckley & Sons, Inc., headquartered in Vineyard Haven,
Massachusetts, is a dealer of building material and supplies.  H N
Hinckley & Sons filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Mass. Case
No. 18-10398) on Feb. 6, 2018.  In the petition signed by Wayne M.
Guyther III, president, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities
at $1 million to $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Joan
N. Feeney.  The Debtor tapped Posternak Blankstein & Lund LLP as
its legal counsel. Schlossberg LLC is the special counsel.


HARD ROCK EXPLORATION: Trustee to Surrender Life Insurance Policies
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Leasure, Jr., the duly qualified and acting Chapter 11
Trustee of Hard Rock Exploration, Inc. and its affiliates, asks the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of West Virginia to
authorize the surrender of individual life insurance policies on
the Shareholders from Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. and
obtain the cash surrender value ("CSV").

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtors entered into numerous loan
transactions with Huntington National Bank.  On July 26, 2010, four
of the individual shareholders of the Debtors -- Duane Yost, James
Stephens, Monica Francisco, and Gregory Laughlin -- jointly and
severally borrowed $6.25 million from Huntington.  Each of the five
Debtors executed a guaranty of the Shareholders' indebtedness under
the $6,250,000 Loan.

The proceeds of the $6,250,000 Loan were used by the Debtors to
purchase the Life Insurance Policies on July 28, 2010 in the total
aggregate face value amount of $44,266,444, as follows:
   
                     Yost     Stephens     Laughlin     Francisco

     Policy No.   18004911    180004863    180004872    180004866
     Face Value  $13,756,284 $13,756,284  $14,147,600   $2,606,276

Debtors Hard Rock, Blue Jacket Gathering ("BJG"), and Caraline
Energy Co. ("CEC") were named as both the owners and the
beneficiaries of the Life Insurance Policies.  The Life Insurance
Policies have been assigned to Huntington.  The Trustee, in
consultation with Huntington and the counsel for the Shareholders,
has analyzed the best course of action to maximize the value of the
Debtors' estates with respect to the Life Insurance Policies.  The
Trustee has been unable to identify a market for selling the
Debtors' interests in the Life Insurance Policies that would exceed
the CSV of the Life Insurance Policies.  However, the Trustee,
standing in the shoes of the Life Insurance Policies' owners, can
"surrender" the Life Insurance Policies to Lincoln National Life
Insurance Co. pursuant to the terms of the Life Insurance Policies.


The Trustee has also determined that the CSV of the Life Insurance
Policies is decreasing.  Given the decline in CSV, from an
aggregate CSV of $5,746,626 on Jan. 31, 2018 to an aggregate CSV of
$5,672,345 on June 18, 2018 (a $74,281 reduction), the Trustee
believes it is in the best interest of the Estate, and would
maximize the recovery available to the Estate, to surrender the
Life Insurance Policies as soon as possible.  Moreover, the value
to the Estate from surrendering the Life Insurance Policies will be
higher than it would have been before to July 28, 2018 because the
Surrender Penalty for all policies decreased on July 28, 2018, for
an aggregate total decrease of $221,296.  Thus, the Trustee
believes this is the best time to surrender the Life Insurance
Policies to maximize the value to the Estate.

When Huntington filed its proof of claim, Claim No. 6-2, on Oct. 3,
2017, the outstanding principal balance owed on the $6,250,000 Note
was $6,575,588, which is expected to be greater than the CSV of the
Life Insurance Policies.  The Trustee cannot know in advance what
the exact CSV of the Life Insurance Policies will be at the time of
surrender.  Lincoln cannot predict with precision what the CSV of
the Life Insurance Policies will be at a future date because they
are indexed universal life policies; a portion of the value of the
Life Insurance Policies are allocated to indexed accounts and the
market may go up or down to some degree.  However, the Trustee
believes that the CSV will be approximately $5,893,641 (the June
2018 CSV adjusted for the reduced surrender penalty).

The Trustee asks authority to consummate the transaction upon entry
of a final order approving the Motion.  Once the transaction is
consummated, the Trustee asks authority to pay the proceeds of
surrendering the Life Insurance Policies as follows: 3% of the
proceeds will be paid as the Trustees' fees on the distribution,
and the remaining proceeds will be paid to Huntington.

Although Huntington has the right, pursuant to the July 1, 2015
Forbearance Agreement between Huntington, on the one hand, and the
Debtors and Shareholders, on the other hand, to apply the proceeds
to any indebtedness, Huntington has agreed to apply the proceeds
first to the indebtedness on the $6,250,000 Note.

Finally, the Debtors ask the Court to waive the stay of
effectiveness of the Agreed Order provided for in Bankruptcy Rule
6004(h).

A copy of the Notes and Agreements attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Hard_Rock_610_Sales.pdf

                  About Hard Rock Exploration

Founded in 2003, Hard Rock Exploration, Inc., and its affiliates
provide oil and gas exploration and production services in Virginia
and West Virginia.  Hard Rock focuses on drilling horizontal
wells.

Hard Rock Exploration, Inc., and its affiliates filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Lead Case No. 17-20459) on Sept. 5,
2017.  The affiliates are Caraline Energy Company (Bankr. S.D.
W.Va. 17-20461); Brothers Realty, LLC (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. 17-20462);
Blue Jacket Gathering, LLC (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. 17-20463) and Blue
Jacket Partnership (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. 17-20464).

The petitions were signed by James L. Stephens, the Debtors'
president.

At the time of filing, Hard Rock estimated $10 million to $50
million in assets and liabilities.  Caraline Energy estimated $10
million to $50 million in assets and liabilities.

The Hon. Frank W. Volk presides over the case.

The Debtors are represented by Christopher S. Smith, Esq. of Hoyer,
Hoyer & Smith, PLLC and Taft A. McKinstry, Esq., at Fowler Bell
PLLC.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Oct. 18, 2017, appointed three
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case of Hard Rock Exploration, Inc.  The
committee members are: (1) Richard L. Wilson; (2) John M. Dosker;
and (3) Jim Schwab Pi Star Communications.


HJH CONSULTING: Former Exec Compelled to Produce Tax Returns
------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Ronald B. King denied in part and granted in part
The HJH Consulting Group, Inc., and affiliates' motion to compel
Stephen Canty, a former executive of the Debtor entities, to
produce a variety of documents.

The Debtors claim the former executive committed fraud against the
company and breached his fiduciary duty; he is under criminal
investigation for related allegations. This is not a case about
determination of guilt or the specific contents of the documents
requested. Instead, the issue before the Court is whether an
individual under criminal investigation may properly invoke his
Fifth Amendment privilege in a bankruptcy case by refusing to
produce documents he believes may be self-incriminating.

The Fifth Amendment protects against compelled testimony that may
be self-incriminating. The privilege extends to instances where
document production may have a testimonial nature, with some
exceptions. These exceptions include Required Records such as tax
returns, Foregone Conclusions where the document's existence and
possession are not in question and the defendant is not asked to
authenticate or verify the document, and circumstances where the
possible testimony has been deemed not to be self-incriminating
after an in camera review. Where parallel civil and criminal
proceedings exist, courts must tread exceptionally lightly when
considering motions to compel, so as not to trample the
constitutional rights of defendants and jeopardize the integrity of
the criminal investigation.

Debtors' attempts to compel Mr. Canty to produce potentially
self-incriminating documents run counter to the Fifth Amendment.
Mr. Canty properly invoked his privilege but may be compelled to
produce documents that fall into exceptions to the Act of
Production Doctrine. Those documents are few. Mr. Canty may not be
compelled to produce his communications, bank account balances and
information, or alleged written admissions of guilt. Mr. Canty may
be compelled to produce recent tax records and W-2 forms.

Thus, the motion to compel production is denied in part and granted
in part. Mr. Canty is only ordered to produce his personal income
tax returns, franchise tax returns, and W-2 forms from the last
four years; in all other respects, the motion is denied.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion dated August 24, 2018 is
available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb18-50788-136.pdf

                     About HJH Consulting

Kerrville, Texas-based The HJH Consulting Group, Inc. d/b/a The
SALT Group -- http://www.thesaltgroup.com/-- is a consulting firm
specializing in operating cost and expense reduction reviews.

HJH and its affiliates US Tax Recovery Partners, LLC and B2B
Prospecting, LLC filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Tex.
Lead Case No. 18-50788) on April 2, 2018.  In the petitions signed
by Harlan J. Hall, CEO, each Debtor listed assets of less than
$50,000, and liabilities ranging from $10 million to $50 million.


ILLINOIS STAR: Ongoing Litigation, Negotiation Delays Plan Filing
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Illinois Star Centre, LLC, filed its 7th motion with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Illinois, seeking an
extension of the exclusive periods for filing a plan and for
obtaining acceptance of a plan through and including Nov. 5, 2018
and Feb. 5, 2019, respectively.

The Motion provides that Debtor previously sought and the Court
granted Debtor multiple extensions of the Plan Filing Deadline and
the Plan Filing Exclusive Period such that both the Plan Filing
Deadline and the Plan Filing Exclusive Period are currently set to
expire on September 4, 2018. Moreover, the Debtor's current
exclusive period for obtaining acceptances of its plan is set to
expire on December 4, 2018.

The Debtor notes that the instant case was filed so that it could
obtain finality as to the alleged claims of The City of Marion
through the adversary proceeding commenced by the Debtor on July
10, 2017. On August 10, 2017, The City of Marion filed a motion to
dismiss the Adversary. After the disqualification and substitution
of counsel by The City of Marion, the motion to dismiss was taken
up for hearing on May 8, 2018. The motion was granted, however, the
Debtor was granted until July 9, 2018 to file an amended complaint
against The City of Marion.

The Debtor has since filed its Second Amended Complaint against The
City of Marion. The answer deadline for The City of Marion to
respond is September 6, 2018.

Given the Debtor's pending negotiations with its tenants and
ongoing litigation with its largest potential creditor in the
Adversary, the Debtor submits that it would be reasonable to allow
the Debtor an extension of the Plan Filing Deadline and Plan Filing
Exclusive Period and an extension of the Plan Acceptance Exclusive
Period.

Moreover, the Debtor submits that it remains committed to moving
its case towards a resolution through a Chapter 11 plan or sale
process as evidenced by its recent retention of a broker to sell
its facility.

                   About Illinois Star Centre

Illinois Star Centre LLC owns the Illinois Star Centre Mall located
at 3000 W. Deyoung Street, Marion.  The mall, which is valued at
$5.5 million, offers more than 50 stores and restaurants and serves
the Southern Illinois Community with events that showcase local
talent.

Illinois Star Centre sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ill. Case No. 17-30691) on May 4,
2017.  In the petition signed by Dennis D. Ballinger, Jr., its
managing member, the Debtor disclosed $5.6 million in assets and
zero liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Laura K. Grandy.

Carmody MacDonald, P.C., is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel, and
Hoffman Slocomb LLC, is its special counsel.  The Debtor tapped
Vista Properties and Investments to assist in the marketing and
sale of its real estate located at 3000 DeYoung, Marion, Illinois.


No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.


JBECKS PROPERTIES: Seeks Authority on Cash Collateral Use
---------------------------------------------------------
JBecks Properties, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of New York to use cash collateral
in which New York Business Development Corporation, Lending Club
Corporation, Colonial Funding Group, LLC, and CIT Bank, N.A. d/b/a
Direct Capital have or allege to have a lien or security interest.

The Debtor owns and operates Mr. Bills Restaurant & Bar, located at
1500 Cleveland Drive, Cheektowaga, New York. Pursuant to the
schedules Mr. Bills assets are valued at $61,564 and is subject to
a first priority blanket security interest in favor of NYBDC, in
the approximate amount of $569,797 and subordinate liens in the
approximate amount of $100,000 (approx).

The Debtor has an immediate need to utilize cash and receipts to
pay necessary expenses relating to the Mr. Bills business
operations in order to prevent the occurrence of immediate and
irreparable harm to those operations.

The following creditors assert a perfected security interest in
cash collateral: (i) New York Business Development Corporation with
an outstanding indebtedness of approximately $569,750; (ii)
LendingClub Corporation with an outstanding indebtedness of
approximately $26,000; (iii) Colonial Funding Group, LLC with an
outstanding indebtedness of approximately $68,486; and (iv) CIT
d/b/a DirectCapital with an outstanding indebtedness of
approximately $18,000.

As adequate protection to the Secured Creditors, the Debtor
proposes to give Secured Creditors rollover replacement liens on
the same types and kinds of property on which the Secured Creditors
assert liens pre-petition, to the extent of cash collateral
actually used.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nywb18-11425-8.pdf

                  About JBecks Properties

JBecks Properties, Inc., is a Sub-chapter "C" corporation that owns
and operates Mr. Bills Restaurant & Bar located at 1500 Cleveland
Drive, Cheektowaga, New York.  It is in the business of operating a
bar/restaurant and activities incidental thereto.

JBecks Properties filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-11425) on July 24, 2018.
In the petition signed by John A. Beck, president, the Debtor
estimated under $100,000 in assets and under $1 million in debt.
The Debtor is represented by Robert B. Gleichenhaus at
Gleichenhaus, Marchese & Weishaar, P.C.


JOHN PALCZUK: District Court Dismisses Steven Conway's Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------
Defendants Richard Michael Heyl and Jennifer Ann Heyl filed a joint
motion to refer the case captioned STEVEN CONWAY, et al.,
Plaintiffs, v. RICHARD MICHAEL HEYL, et al., Defendants, No.
4:17CV2254 RLW (E.D. Mo.) to the Bankruptcy Court. The Heyls also
filed a motion for sanctions. Defendants John J. Palczuk and Karen
E. Palczuk filed a motion to dismiss the case and a motion to
strike Plaintiffs' joint responses to the Palczuks reply to
Plaintiffs' response to motion to dismiss.

Upon review of the case, District Judge Ronnie L. White granted the
Heyls' motion for referral and the case as to the Heyls is referred
to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.
The Heyls' motion for sanctions, however, is denied without
prejudice. The Palczuks motion to dismiss is granted and the motion
to strike is denied as moot.

The Heyls argued that the case is a "core proceeding" which arises
under Title 11 and should be referred to the Bankruptcy Court.
Plaintiffs respond, with no legal support, that the Court has the
authority to overrule a local rule when justice requires and that
hearing this bankruptcy matter in the district court would promote
judicial efficiency and avoid piecemeal litigation.

Contrary to Plaintiffs' position, the Court does not read the
statute or local rule as discretionary. Plaintiffs acknowledge that
the proceeding arises under Title 11, stating that "Plaintiffs'
cause of action is specifically pointed at whether their debts are
non-dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. section 523(a)(19)(i) and (ii)."
Furthermore, to the extent that Plaintiffs contend that their case
is unrelated to the underlying bankruptcy case, the Court agrees
with the Heyls that the First Amended Complaint to Determine
Dischargeability of Debts is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C.
section 157(b)(2)(I), as it pertains to "determinations as to the
dischargeability of particular debts." Therefore, the Court will
grant the Defendant the Heyls' Motion for Referral to Bankruptcy
Court and refer Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint to the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Likewise, the Court finds that dismissal of this action as to the
Defendants the Palczuks is appropriate. In their motion, the
Palczuks assert that an adversary proceeding to determine
dischargeability of a debt is a core proceeding falling within the
Bankruptcy Court's jurisdiction. Further, they contend that the
Bankruptcy Court in the Eastern District of North Carolina retains
jurisdiction over the Palczuks' bankruptcy case, and thus the
present cause of action is not properly before this Court. The
Plaintiffs' response, aside from being untimely, is nonsensical.
The Court finds that it lacks jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' claims
against the Palczuks and dismisses those claims accordingly.

Finally, the Heyls have filed a Motion for Sanctions against
Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs' counsel, David Fondren. The Heyls assert
that Plaintiffs filed the case in the United States District Court
for an improper purpose to harass and needlessly increase the cost
of litigation. The Court finds that any motion for sanctions by the
Heyls and against Plaintiffs would be more properly adjudicated
before the Bankruptcy Court. Thus, the Court denies the motion for
sanctions without prejudice.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum and Order dated August 13, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2LBlTS3 from Leagle.com.

Steve Conway, Lori Conway, Lorcon LLC #1 & Lorcon LLC #4,
Plaintiffs, represented by David R. Fondren, FONDREN LEGAL CENTER,
L.C.

Richard Michael Heyl & Jennifer Ann Heyl, Defendants, represented
by Robert E. Eggmann, III  --  ree@carmodymacdonald.com -- CARMODY
MACDONALD P.C.

John Palczuk filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
E.D. N.C. Case No. 11-04017) on May 25, 2011.


JOURNAL-CHRONICLE: Discloses Additional Loan Documents Modification
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Journal-Chronicle Company, doing-business-as J-C Press, filed with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota a first
amended disclosure statement dated August 8, 2018, explaining its
Chapter 11 plan.

The Debtor discloses that it currently has approximately $685,000
of accounts receivable.  The Debtor believes its accounts
receivables will all be collected.  The Debtor will provide or pay
out of operating funds, including accounts receivable for all of
the administrative expenses and business debts in the ordinary
course of business.

The First Amended Disclosure Statement provides that under the
Plan, Class 3 consists of General Unsecured Claims.  This class
will consist of allowed unsecured claims not entitled to priority
and not treated in any other class in the Plan, including the
unsecured portion of any secured classes claim.  The allowed claims
in Class 3 are in the approximate amount of $2.215 Million,
including the claims of a former insider, Sabra Otteson, a former
owner, with an asserted claim in excess of $1.1 Million, due from
the sale of the business.  The holder of a Class 3 Allowed Claim
will be paid the Pro Rata Share of $325,000 or approximately 15% of
the total of all unsecured claims, over time.

Payments will be made in 10 annual installments with the first
payment to be made within 30 days following the one year
anniversary of the Effective Date, and on the same date each year
thereafter as follows:

   Year 1 through 5   -  $22,000
   Years 6 through 10 -  $43,000

Until the full $325,000 has been fully paid out and distributed.
These payments shall be in full satisfaction of each Allowed Class
3 Unsecured Claim.

The First Amended Disclosure Statement disclosed that allowed
general unsecured claims total $2.215 million, which includes the
claims of former insider, Sabra Otteson, a former owner, with an
asserted claim amount in excess of $1.1. million, due for the sale
of the business.  The First Amended Disclosure Statement also
provides that the Debtor estimates an additional $10,000 of
accountant fees and expenses.

The Debtor also disclosed additional modification to loan
documents.  Among other things, the loan documents were modified to
provide that the Negative Covenants will be amended to "$50,000
annually" in the Indebtedness and Liens section.

The Debtor, after confirmation, will continue to manage its affairs
and assets and will disburse funds, serving as required as
disbursing agent.  The Debtor will remain responsible for operating
the business, paying its expenses and making distributions to
creditors as set forth in the Plan.  The Debtor will provide or pay
out of operating funds, including accounts receivable for all of
the Debtor’s administrative expenses and business debts in the
ordinary course of business.  The Debtor currently has
approximately $685,000 of accounts receivable.  The Debtor believes
that its accounts receivable will all be collected.

A copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement from
PacerMonitor.com is available at https://tinyurl.com/y9b4pgfr at no
charge.

                  About Journal-Chronicle Co.

Journal-Chronicle Company, a Minnesota corporation --
http://www.j-cpress.com/services-- provides offset, digital and
wide-format printing services.  The Company also offers mailing,
fulfillment and marketing support to its clients. J-C Press works
with UPS, FedEx, USPS and a variety of other carriers to make sure
customers get the products on time.  The company ships to all 50
states and across the globe.

Journal-Chronicle Company, doing business as J-C Press, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Minn. Case No. 17-33322) on Oct. 23,
2017.  In the petition signed by Patrick J. McDermott, president,
the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1 million to $10
million.  The case is assigned to Judge William J. Fisher.  Larkin
Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd., led by Thomas Flynn, Esq., is the
Debtor's counsel.


KB HOME: Fitch Hikes IDR to 'BB-' & Alters Outlook to Positive
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded the Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of KB
Home to 'BB-' from 'B+'. The Rating Outlook was revised to Stable
from Positive.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Top 6 Homebuilder with Geographic and Customer Diversity: KB Home
was the sixth largest homebuilder from 2014 to 2017 and had been
consistently among the top five builders from 2004 to 2013. The
company operates in 35 markets across seven states and has a top 10
position in 13 of the 50 largest metro markets in the U.S. and a
top 5 position in 10 metro markets, giving the company greater
access to land deals and local labor and providing a benefit from
scale in managing their margins.

Management estimates that about 53% of its homes were directed to
the first-time homebuyer, 22% to first move-up, 12% to second
move-up, and 13% to the active adult segment in Q2 2018. For the
first six months of FY18, 26.9% of home deliveries and 44.9% of
revenues were generated from the state of California. As of May 31,
2018, about 50% of KB Home's inventory was located in California.
Average selling prices (ASPs) are much higher in California than
the company's other segments. ASPs in California were $673,100 in
Q2 2018 compared to $307,700, $304,500, and $279,900 in the
company's Southwest, Central, and Southeast segments, respectively.


Improving Financial Results: KB Home's homebuilding revenues during
the first six months of FY18 (ending May 31, 2018) increased 8.3%
to $1.97 billion as home deliveries improved 2.8% to 4,940 homes
and the average selling price of these homes advanced 5.9% to
$396,400. Delivery growth was lower than the low double digit
increase reported during the same period last year as the company
had fewer average operating communities during the six months ended
May 31, 2018.

Homebuilding gross profit margin (excluding inventory and land
option charges) increased about 160 bps during the 2018 YTD period
to 17.2% as a result of higher ASPs and favorable product mix,
which more than offset the impact of lower margin deliveries from
reactivated communities and continued land, labor and material cost
pressures. Fitch expects revenues will grow about 5% in 2018 and
gross margins and SG&A leverage improve consistent with Q2 LTM
results as ASPs increase and fixed cost leverage improves with
higher deliveries.

Land Spend and Community Count: KB Home had 8% fewer average active
communities in the second quarter compared to the prior year. In
the company's West Coast segment, average community count declined
nearly 20%. The company expects community count to be flat
year-over-year at the company level and 15% higher in California by
the end of the year. Management indicated that the company has been
selling out of communities at a faster pace than anticipated and
has experienced some delays in opening new communities. The company
has worked to achieve this goal by increasing total lots controlled
by 4,500 lots year-over-year as of Q2 2018.

Fitch expects higher land and development spending in 2018 and 2019
as the company continues to build its community count. Despite
this, Fitch expects Cash Flow from Operations (CFFO) to remain
positive in 2018 and 2019. Fitch expects delivery growth to return
to mid- to high-single digit pace in 2019 after low-single digit
delivery growth in 2018.

Activation of Mothballed Assets a Marginal Headwind but Aids Cash
Flow: KB Home has been reactivating previously mothballed
communities. During first-quarter 2012, the company had about $737
million of land held for future development or sale, accounting for
about 43% of its total inventory. As of second-quarter 2018, land
held for future development or sale has declined to approximately
$305 million or about 9% of total inventory. Management indicated
that as of second-quarter 2018, about 15% of its active communities
were from inventory previously classified as land held for future
development. The gross margins from home deliveries from
reactivated communities are lower, but the reactivation of
previously mothballed communities allows the company to monetize
these assets and use the cash flow to invest in assets that could
generate higher returns.

Credit Metrics Improving: KB Home's net debt to capitalization
ratio (excluding $175 million of cash classified by Fitch as not
readily available for working capital and general liquidity)
declined from 77% at FYE13 to 60% at FYE14 to 48.0% at FYE17 as the
company has reduced debt and increased shareholder's equity. This
ratio was 49.3% as of May 31, 2018. The slightly higher net debt to
capitalization ratio at end Q2 2018 reflects the seasonality of
KBH's cash flow and working capital requirements as the company
typically generates most of its cash during the second half of the
year. Total debt to capitalization declined from 80% at FYE13 to
54.7% at FYE17 and 55.1% at May 31, 2018. Fitch expects net debt to
capitalization will be about 45% at FYE18 and roughly 40% at FYE19.
The company has a 2019 target net debt to capitalization ratio of
40%-50%.

Similarly, debt-to-EBITDA has improved from 8.4x at FYE15 to 4.3x
at FYE17 and 4.0x for the LTM period ending May 31, 2018. Interest
coverage rose from 1.7x at the end of FY15 to 3.2x at FYE17 and
3.8x for the May 31, 2018 LTM period. Fitch expects these credit
metrics will improve further during FYE18 and FYE19 from EBITDA
growth. The company reduced debt outstanding by $38 million in 2016
and $315 million in 2017.

Housing Continues Modest Expansion: Fitch expects continued
moderate, cyclical improvement in housing demand as healthy
economic growth and favorable demographics should offset more
pronounced inflation and higher interest rates, However, growth in
housing starts and new home sales are expected to decelerate
further as erosion in affordability becomes more pronounced as the
cycle matures. Fitch projects total housing starts will grow 6.4%
in 2018 and 1.7% in 2019, with single-family starts advancing 7.5%
and 4% in 2018 and 2019, respectively. New home sales are forecast
to increase 7% this year and 4% in 2019, while existing home sales
are forecast to fall 1% in 2018 and remain flat in 2019.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

KB Home's Issuer Default Rating of 'BB-' is supported by the
company's size, geographic diversity, customer and product focus
and conservative building practices. The company has comparable
credit metrics to homebuilding peers such as M/I Homes, Inc.
(BB-/Stable) but weaker metrics than Meritage Homes Corporation
(BB/Stable). However, KB Home is larger than these two competitors
and is more geographically diversified. KB Home is the sixth
largest homebuilder in the U.S., delivering 10,909 homes during its
FY17. The company has operations in 35 markets across seven states
and has a top 10 position in 13 of the 50 largest metro markets in
the U.S, including a top 5 position in 10 of those markets. While
KB Home's customer and product focus is diversified, it has heavier
weighting to the first time homebuyer segment. Additionally, the
company has meaningful exposure to the state of California.

The company generally does less speculative building of homes than
almost all of its peers, which is a low risk approach to
homebuilding. KB Home is also one of a handful of public
homebuilders aggressively marketing energy efficient homes as a way
of differentiating its homes from other homebuilders' product and
existing homes for sale.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  -- Total housing starts increase 6.4% in 2018 and low
single-digits in 2019, with single-family starts advancing 7.5% in
2018 and 4% in 2019. New home sales are forecast to grow 7% in 2018
and 4% in 2019. Existing home sales are projected to fall 1% in
2018 and remain flat in 2019;

  -- KB Home's homebuilding revenues increase about 5% in FY 2018
and mid- to high-single digits in FY 2019 as total deliveries
increase low- to mid-single digits and average sale prices increase
low-single digits in 2018;

  -- The company's net debt to capitalization falls to about 45% at
FY-end 2018 and around 40% at FY-end 2019;

  -- The company increases land and development spending in 2018
and 2019;

  -- KB Home generates cash flow from operations of $75 to $125
million in FY 2018.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- KB Home shows further steady improvement in credit metrics,
such as net debt to capitalization ratio sustained below 45% and
management lowers its net debt to capitalization target, which is
currently 40% to 50%, to the lower end of this range, while
maintaining a healthy liquidity position (in excess of $500 million
in combination of cash and revolver availability).

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- There is sustained erosion of profits due to either weak
housing activity, meaningful and continued loss of market share,
and/or ongoing land, materials and labor cost pressures (resulting
in margin contraction and weakened credit metrics, including net
debt to capitalization sustained above 50%) and KB Home maintains
an overly aggressive land and development spending program that
leads to consistent negative cash flow from operations, higher debt
levels and diminished liquidity position.

LIQUIDITY

Strong Liquidity: As of May 31, 2018, KB home had $670 million in
total cash and $463 million of borrowing availability under its
$500 million revolving credit facility that matures in July 2021.
Fitch expects the company to invest more heavily in land and
development in the next four to six quarters, although Fitch
expects the company to remain CFFO positive and maintain a strong
liquidity position.

Debt Maturities: The company has material debt maturities in the
next few years. The $300 million senior unsecured notes due in 2018
were repaid with cash in June. Fitch expects future debt maturities
to be addressed through a combination of refinancing and debt pay
down. Fitch expects the company to generate cash flow from
operations (CFFO) of $75 million to $125 million in FY 2018 and
$125 million to $175 million in FY 2019 and to maintain a strong
liquidity position in these years.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has upgraded the following rating for KB Home:

  -- Long-term IDR to 'BB-' from 'B+'.

Fitch has also affirmed the following rating for KB Home:

  -- Senior unsecured debt at 'BB-'; revised Recovery Rating to
'RR4' from 'RR3'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


KUM GANG: Seeks Authorization on Cash Collateral Use
----------------------------------------------------
Kum Gang, Inc., seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of New York to use cash collateral to pay
reasonable operating expenses vital to its reorganization.

The Debtor has submitted a 12-week Budget which provides total
weekly expenses of approximately $88,385. The Budget provides total
projected cash disbursement of approximately $1,060,617 for the
period commencing week ending July 14, 2018 through week ending
Oct. 5, 2018.

Prior to the commencement of this case, the Debtor maintained one
or more operating accounts at Pacific City Bank and at Noah Bank.
The Debtor has also opened a DIP account at TD Bank.

Currently, the Debtor has insufficient cash, absent use of Cash
Collateral, to meet its ongoing obligations necessary to maintain
and operate its business.  The Debtor believes that it will be able
to continue its operations as long as it is able to access and use
cash collateral in its existing checking and other bank accounts at
Noah Bank and Pacific City Bank, as well as in its DIP account at
ID Bank, so that it can continue to pay its employees, vendors and
suppliers on a timely basis and to continue its existing business
operations.

The Debtor believes that Noah Bank is the only entity with a lien
on cash collateral. The current outstanding secured obligation to
Noah Bank is approximately $654,197.  The Debtor has about $172,000
in inventory, approximately $52,723 in equipment, and approximately
$71,000 in receivables.  Accordingly, with a Cash Collateral Order
in place, plus these additional assets, the Debtor asserts that
Noah Bank would substantially be secured.

To adequately protect Noah Bank with respect to the cash collateral
utilized during its case, the Debtor will maintain the value of its
business through payment of the normal monthly expenditures in
general accord with the Budget. Furthermore, as set forth in the
Budget, the Debtor proposes to pay $10,873 monthly (approximately
$2,700 per week) as service in the outstanding secured debt.

In addition, the Debtor will grant replacement liens in all of its
prepetition and postpetition assets and proceeds, to the extent
that Noah Bank has a valid security interest in said prepetition
assets on the Petition Date and in the continuing order of priority
that existed as of the Petition Date.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

                http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb18-43997-16.pdf

                         About Kum Gang, Inc.

Kum Gang, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-43997) on July 12, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Ji Sung Yoo, president, the Debtor estimated
assets of less than $100,000 and debts of less than $1 million.
The Debtor is represented by Kenneth F. McCallion, Esq. at
McCallion & Associates LLP.


LEHMAN BROTHERS: 1st AML, et al., Bid to Dismiss Complaints Junked
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Shelley C. Chapman entered an order denying the
Defendants' omnibus motion to dismiss the complaints in the
adversary proceeding captioned LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC.,
Plaintiff, v. 1ST ADVANTAGE MORTGAGE, LLC., et al., Defendants,
Adversary Proceeding No. 16-01019 (SCC) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) for lack
of subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue.

Prior to its bankruptcy, LBHI, directly or through its affiliates,
including Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, engaged in the purchase and
sale of mortgage loans. LBHI arranged directly or through
affiliates such as LBB to purchase mortgage loans from loan
originators and other third parties including the Defendants; it
then packaged such loans for securitization or sale to other third
parties. In transactions involving the Defendants, the Defendants
sold the mortgage loans to LBB (which thereafter assigned its
rights thereunder to LBHI) pursuant to Agreements in which, among
other things, the Defendants contractually agreed to indemnify LBB
and hold it harmless from liabilities or losses it might incur
(including liabilities to third parties) as a result of breaches of
the representations and warranties in the Agreements.

On Dec. 6, 2011, this Court confirmed the Modified Third Amended
Joint Chapter 11 Plan of LBHI and Its Affiliated Debtors.

The Plan Administrator identified over 11,000 loans and over 3,000
potential counterparties against which LBHI allegedly held
third-party contractual claims for indemnification and/or
reimbursement by virtue of the GSE Settlements. To manage this
volume of indemnification claims, the Court permitted the Plan
Administrator to implement a pre-litigation mediation protocol with
the Sellers from which it sought indemnification. See Alternative
Dispute Resolution Procedures Order for Indemnification Claims of
The Debtors against Mortgage Loan Sellers, dated June 24, 2014.

By the complaints filed in the Adversary Proceeding, the
allegations of which are substantially identical across all
Defendants, LBHI claims that each of the Defendants breached its
obligations under the Agreements by selling or submitting defective
mortgage loans into LBHI's loan sale and securitization channels,
and, thus, LBHI has a third-party indemnification claim against
each Defendant for LBHI's liability to the GSEs. Specifically, the
Complaints allege that it was Defendants' breaches of the
representations, warranties, and/or covenants under the Agreements
that caused LBHI to have to compensate the GSEs pursuant to
agreements between LBHI and the GSEs that contained
representations, warranties, and/or covenants co-extensive with
those contained in the Agreements.

Upon analysis of the facts presented, the Court finds that,
contrary to Defendants' assertions, the Plan in fact preserves the
Plan Administrator's right to prosecute the Indemnification Claims
and provides for the bankruptcy court's retention of jurisdiction
over such claims. The Plan Administrator was appointed to
wind-down, sell, and otherwise liquidate the assets of the Debtors
for the benefit of the Debtors' creditors. The Plan Administrator's
authority to liquidate assets includes prosecuting Litigation
Claims to maximize distributions to creditors.

Furthermore, the Plan provides that this Court retains exclusive
jurisdiction "of all matters arising under, arising out of, or
related to, the Chapter 11 Cases and the Plan" including for the
purpose of "hear[ing] and determin[ing] any actions brought to
recover all assets of the Debtors and property of the estates,
wherever located . . ." and "[t]o determine any and all adversary
proceedings, applications and contested matters relating to the
Chapter 11 Cases, in each case in accordance with applicable law."
The Adversary Proceedings fall squarely within these jurisdictional
provisions.

And because the Court finds that section 1409(d) does not apply to
the Adversary Proceedings, venue is proper here, in the district in
which LBHI's chapter 11 case has been pending for almost ten years,
pursuant to section 1409(a), which provides that "a proceeding
arising under title 11 or arising in or related to a case under
title 11 . . . may be commenced in the district court in which such
case is pending." The Court observes that maintaining venue in this
District and permitting the Adversary Proceedings to be resolved in
one centralized forum by a Court extremely familiar with the
Debtors' chapter 11 cases and the Adversary Proceedings is
consistent with the policy underlying section 1409(a): promoting
the expeditious and economical administration of a bankruptcy case.
The Court declines to address Defendants' remaining arguments with
respect to the venue analysis to be conducted under applicable
non-bankruptcy law in cases where section 1409(d) is found to
apply. The Motion seeking dismissal of the Adversary Proceedings
against the Defendants on the basis of improper venue is denied.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision and Order dated
August 13, 2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2BSjxi9 from
Leagle.com.

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Adam M.
Bialek -- abialek@wmd-law.com -- Wollmuth Maher & Deutsch LLP,
Maritza Dominguez Braswell -- mbraswell@foxrothschild.com -- Fox
Rothschild LLP, Caleb Durling -- cdurling@foxrothschild.com -- Fox
Rothschild LLP, Mara R. Lieber -- mlieber@wmd-law.com  -- Wollmuth
Maher & Deutsch LLP, Christopher J. Lucht -- clucht@wmd-law.com --
Wollmuth Maher & Deutsch LLP, William A. Maher --
wmaher@wmd-law.com -- Wollmuth Maher & Deutsch LLP, Michael A.
Rollin -- mrollin@foxrothschild.com -- Fox Rothschild LLP & Lindsay
Unruh , Rollin Braswell Fisher LLC.

1st Advantage Mortgage, L.L.C., Defendant, pro se.

Amera Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, pro se.

American Home Equity Corp., Defendant, pro se.

American Lending Network Inc., Defendant, pro se.

America's Mortgage Alliance, Inc., Defendant, represented by Martin
J. Estevao -- mestevao@armstrongteasdale.com -- Armstrong Teasdale,
Alec P. Harris -- aharris@armstrongteasdale.com -- Armstrong
Teasdale LLP & Meshach Y. Rhoades –
mrhoades@armstrongteasdale.com -- Armstrong Teasdale LLP.

Approved Funding Corp., Ascent Home Loans Inc., Broadview Mortgage
Corporation, CMG Mortgage, Inc., First California Mortgage Company,
First Mortgage Corp., Mega Capital Funding, Inc., Merrimack
Mortgage Company, Inc., New Fed Mortgage Corp., Nova Financial &
Investment Corp., Oaktree Funding Corp., Republic State Mortgage
Company, Residential Home Funding Corp., Simonich Corp., Sterling
National Mortgage Company, Inc., Sun American Mortgage Company,
W.R. Starkey Mortgage LLP & Gateway Funding Diversified Mortgage
Services, L.P., Defendants, represented by Tracy Lee Henderson --
thenderson@americanmlg.com -- American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. &
Timothy William Salter -- tsalter@blankrome.com -- Blank Rome LLP.

                   About Lehman Brothers

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. -- http://www.lehman.com/-- was the
fourth largest investment bank in the United States.  For more than
150 years, Lehman Brothers has been a leader in the global
financial markets by serving the financial needs of corporations,
governmental units, institutional clients and individuals
worldwide.

Lehman Brothers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Sept. 15, 2008
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 08-13555).  Lehman's bankruptcy petition
disclosed US$639 billion in assets and US$613 billion in debts,
effectively making the firm's bankruptcy filing the largest in U.S.
history.  Several other affiliates followed thereafter.

Affiliates Merit LLC, LB Somerset LLC and LB Preferred Somerset LLC
sought for bankruptcy protection in December 2009.

The Debtors' bankruptcy cases were assigned to Judge James M. Peck.
Judge Shelley Chapman took over the case after Judge Peck retired
from the bench to join Morrison & Foerster.

A team of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, lawyers led by the late
Harvey R. Miller, Esq., serve as counsel to Lehman.  Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions serves as claims and noticing agent.

Dennis F. Dunne, Esq., Evan Fleck, Esq., and Dennis O'Donnell,
Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, in New York, served
as counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.
Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Capital, Inc., served as the
Committee's investment banker.

On Sept. 19, 2008, the Honorable Gerard E. Lynch of the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York, entered an
order commencing liquidation of Lehman Brothers, Inc., pursuant to
the provisions of the Securities Investor Protection Act (Case No.
08-CIV-8119 (GEL)).  James W. Giddens was appointed as trustee for
the SIPA liquidation of the business of LBI.  He is represented by
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP.

The Bankruptcy Court approved Barclays Bank Plc's purchase of
Lehman Brothers' North American investment banking and capital
markets operations and supporting infrastructure for US$1.75
billion.  Nomura Holdings Inc., the largest brokerage house in
Japan, purchased LBHI's operations in Europe for US$2 plus the
retention of most of employees.  Nomura also bought Lehman's
operations in the Asia Pacific for US$225 million.

Lehman emerged from bankruptcy protection on March 6, 2012, more
than three years after it filed the largest bankruptcy in U.S.
history.  The Chapter 11 plan for the Lehman companies other than
the broker was confirmed in December 2011.

                          *     *     *

As of March 2018, the trustee for LBI has made sixth interim
distributions in the aggregate amount of at least $9 billion.  The
distributions bring total general unsecured creditor claim
recoveries to 39.75%, an achievement far in excess of any
reasonable expectation during the midst of Lehman's collapse and
the financial crisis of the Great Recession.  As of March 31, 2018,
the Trustee has allowed or settled 4,813 general creditor claims
with an aggregate asserted amount of $70.1 billion for an allowed
amount of $22.9 billion.

As for LBHI, following the 15th distribution announced by the team
winding down LBHI in March 2018, Lehman's total distributions to
unsecured creditors will amount to approximately $124.6 billion.
The actual distributions to bondholders are already way above the
projected recovery 21 cents on the dollar when Lehman's bankruptcy
plan went into effect in early 2012.


LEXINGTON MEDICAL: Fitch Withdraws 'BB+' IDR & Rev. Bond Rating
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed at 'BB+' the Issuer Default Rating and
revenue bond rating for various series of bonds issued by the
Lexington County Health Services District, Inc. on behalf of
Lexington Medical Center. The Rating Outlook is Stable.
Simultaneously, Fitch has chosen to withdraw the ratings for
commercial reasons.


LIBERTY INDUSTRIES: Regions Bank Bans Further Cash Collateral Use
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Regions Bank requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida to prohibit Liberty Industries, L.C., and its
debtor-affiliates from further use of its cash collateral.

Regions Bank further requests that it be granted relief from stay
so that it may immediately seek to enforce the Amended Order
Granting Regions Bank's Motion for Summary Judgment entered on July
7, 2016, in the case of Regions Bank v. Liberty Industries, L.C.,
et al, Cause No. 87D02-1508-MF001031, in the Superior Court No. 2
in Warrick County, Indiana, including, to take all actions
necessary to reset and conduct the foreclosure sale of the Debtors'
real property located in Newburgh, Indiana (the "Indiana Action").

This is the third bankruptcy case filed by the Debtors since 2012.
Each of which has delayed Regions Bank from enforcing its rights as
a secured creditor.  Regions Bank is the principal secured creditor
of the Debtors, holding claim a claim against the Debtors in excess
of $2.9 million as of the Petition Date.  The Claim is based on the
Judgment in the Indiana Action, which is secured by a first
priority lien on the real property owned by Liberty Properties in
Newburgh, Indiana and all personal property of the Debtors,
including their inventory, accounts, equipment, general
intangibles, intellectual property and records.

Regions Bank relates that the Debtors filed their first set of
Chapter 11 cases in September 2012 (Lead Case No. 12-32843-PGH),
after defaulting on their obligations to Regions Bank.  In October
2013, the Debtors confirmed a Plan which wiped out 80% of their
unsecured debt.  That Plan restated the debt owed to Regions Bank
and provided for a three-year maturity on the Debtors' amended note
to Regions Bank. However, the Debtors again breached the payment
obligations to Regions Bank and then filed their second set of
Chapter 11 cases (Lead Case No. 16-22332-EPK) to avoid Regions
Bank's foreclosure sale of the Real Property, which was scheduled
for September 8, 2016.

During the second bankruptcy case, the Debtors were unable to
confirm a feasible plan of reorganization. As a result, the Debtors
withdrew their plan, dismissed the case and agreed to the
imposition of a one year ban on any further Chapter 11 filing.
After the dismissal of the second Chapter 11 case, at the Debtors'
request, Regions Bank agreed to postpone a foreclosure sale set for
January 2018, on the basis that the Debtors would make an agreed
payment for $50,000 to Regions Bank on or before March 15, 2018.
But the Debtors, once again, breached that agreement and made no
such payment.

Just prior to the re-scheduled foreclosure sale set for April 12,
2018, the Debtors filed an Expedited Motion to Reopen Lead Case No.
16-22332.  On April 4, 2018, the Court granted the Motion to
Reopen, and the Debtors filed their third set of bankruptcy cases,
along with an Emergency Motion to Use Cash Collateral of Regions
Bank.  

On May 23, 2018, the Court entered the Order authorizing Debtors'
continued use of cash collateral of Regions Bank on an interim
basis. Thereunder, Liberty Industries was required to make a series
of Installment Payments, including a $50,000 payment due on July
15, 2018. Liberty failed to pay the July Installment Payment,
constituting an Event of Default under Paragraph 8 of the Cash
Collateral Order.

Consequently, on July 24, 2018, Regions Bank served a Notice of
Event of Default on the Debtors' counsel by e-mail and fax, with a
copy to counsel for the Committee of Unsecured Creditors. In
response, the Debtors' counsel has advised that the Debtors are
unable to make the July Installment Payment, were shutting down the
business on July 25, 2018, and will seek to dismiss the jointly
administered Chapter 11 cases.

Thus, in the interim, Regions Bank files the instant Motion to
preserve its rights against the cash collateral as a result of the
Debtors' Event of Default, including, to seek relief from the
automatic stay in accordance with the remedies set forth in
Paragraph 9 of the Cash Collateral Order.

Attorneys for Regions Bank:

         Alexandra D. Blye, Esq.
         CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT, P.A.
         525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 1200
         West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
         Telephone: (561) 659-7070
         Facsimile: (561) 659-7368
         E-mail: ablye@carltonfields.com

              -- and --

         David Hywel Leonard, Esq.
         CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT, P.A.
         525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 1200
         4221 W. Boy Scout Blvd., Suite 1000
         Tampa, FL 33607-5780
         Telephone: (813) 223-7000
         Facsimile: (813) 229-4133
         E-mail: hleonard@carltonfields.com

                  About Liberty Industries

Liberty Industries, L.C., d/b/a Tower Innovations --
http://www.towerinnovations.net/-- is a manufacturer of
communication towers, specializing in broadcast and wireless
structures.  Tower Innovations is a privately held company and a
unit of Liberty Industries.  It was founded in Newburgh, Indiana in
2006 after acquiring Kline Towers, established in 1953, and Central
Tower, established in 1984.  Tower Innovations is a
multi-functional provider of communication systems and has
thousands of quality structures in service around the world.  These
include towers for DTV/NTSC, AM and FM broadcasting, two-way, WiFi,
cellular and PCS communications.  The Company offers complete
innovative engineering solutions, design and fabrication services.
Liberty Properties operates a commercial manufacturing facility in
Newburgh, Indiana.

On Sept. 12, 2012, Liberty Industries sought bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 12-32843), and on Sept. 25, 2018,
Liberty Properties filed a Chapter 11 petition (Case No.
12-32882).

On Sept. 7, 2016, Liberty Properties sought Chapter 11 protection
(Case No. 16-22333), and on Sept. 9, 2016, Liberty Industries
sought bankruptcy protection (Case No. 16-22332).

Liberty Industries, L.C., and Liberty Properties At Newburgh, L.C.,
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case Nos. 18-14231
and 18-14232), on April 11, 2018.  In the petitions signed by
William Gates, manager, Liberty Industries disclosed total assets
and liabilities at $4,480,000 each, and Liberty Prop At Newburgh
had $3,710,000 in total assets and $3,330,000 in total
liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Erik P. Kimball.

Robert C. Furr, Esq., at Furr & Cohen, is the Debtors' counsel.

Daniel M. McDermott, U.S. Trustee for Region 21, on May 1, 2018,
appointed five creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of Liberty Industries.
The Committee retained Windels Marx Lane & Mitendorf, LLP as
counsel; and Shraiberg Landau & Page, P.A., as local counsel.


M/I HOMES: Fitch Hikes IDR to 'BB-' & Alters Outlook to Positive
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded the Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of M/I
Homes, Inc. (NYSE: MHO) to 'BB-' from 'B+'. The Rating Outlook was
revised to Stable from Positive.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Relatively Stable Credit Metrics: MHO's undiscounted homebuilding
debt/capitalization ratio fluctuated from 43.2% at year-end 2014 to
45.4% at the conclusion of 2015, 42.8% at year-end 2016, 46.4% at
the end of 2017 and 47.6% as of June 30, 2018. Net
debt/capitalization (excluding $40 million of cash classified by
Fitch as not readily available for working capital) stood at 42.8%
at the end of 2016, 41.7% at year-end 2017 and 46.7% at June 30,
2018. Debt/EBITDA has consistently been around 4.0x while interest
coverage was 3.7x for the LTM period ending June 30, 2018.

The higher leverage levels for June 30, 2018 reflects higher debt
levels for the recently completed acquisition of Pinnacle Homes for
$101 million. Fitch expects net debt/capitalization will be around
46% at year-end 2018 and will be below 45% at the end of 2019.
Fitch also expects debt/EBITDA will be below 4x and interest
coverage above 3.7x by the end of 2018 and during 2019.

Land Strategy: As of June 30, 2018, the company controlled 28,218
lots, of which 46.7% were owned and the remaining lots controlled
through options. Based on LTM closings, MHO controlled 5.3 years of
land and owned roughly 2.5 years of land. MHO has one of the
highest percentage of lots under option and one of the lowest
owned-lot positions among the builders in Fitch's coverage. This
strategy reduces the risk of downside volatility and impairment
charges in a contracting housing market.

Land and Development Spending: MHO spent $529 million on land and
development activities in 2017, up from the $407.8 million and
$437.8 million spent in 2016 and 2015, respectively. During the
first half of 2018, land and development spending totalled $264
million, relatively flat compared to the $268 million spent during
the same period last year. The company expects land and development
spending will be between $575 million and $625 million during 2018.
Fitch is comfortable with this strategy given the company's healthy
liquidity position, well-laddered debt maturity schedule and
management's demonstrated ability to manage its spending. Fitch
expects management will pull back on spending if the recovery in
housing stalls or dissipates.

Cash Flow: The company reported negative $56 million of cash flow
from operations (CFFO, including preferred dividends) during 2017
after generating $33 million of CFFO during 2016. For the June 30,
2018 LTM period, MHO reported negative $34 million of CFFO. Fitch
expects the company will be modestly CFFO negative this year as the
company again increases land and development spending. The company
has also recently announced a $50 million share repurchase program.
MHO has sufficient liquidity to cover negative cash flow and share
repurchases in 2018 and 2019.

Speculative Inventory: Management estimates that of the total
number of homes closed in 2017 and 2016, about 47% and 48%,
respectively, were speculative (spec) homes. MHO ended 2Q'18 with
1,272 spec homes, of which 374 were completed. Total specs at end
of 2Q'18 were 16.4% above the previous year level, while total
completed specs were 10.7% higher YOY. This translates into about
6.1 specs per average community (1.8 completed specs per
community), up slightly from the 5.9 specs per average community
(1.8 completed specs) in 2Q'17. The company has spec homes in order
to facilitate delivery of homes on an immediate need basis. The
company has managed its spec activity in the past, although Fitch
generally views high spec activity as a credit negative, all else
equal, as rapidly deteriorating market conditions could result in
sharply lower margins.

Somewhat Limited Geographic Diversity: The company offers homes for
sale in 209 communities across 16 local markets in 10 states. The
company has a top 10 position in 10 of the 50 largest MSAs in the
country. The company entered the Minneapolis/St. Paul market in
December 2015 with the acquisition of the residential homebuilding
operations of Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. In July 2016, MHO entered the
Sarasota, Florida market by opening a new division. In March 2018,
MHO completed the acquisition of Pinnacle Homes, giving the company
entry into the Detroit market.

Housing Continues Modest Expansion: Fitch expects continued
moderate, cyclical improvement in housing demand as healthy
economic growth and favorable demographics should offset more
pronounced inflation and higher interest rates, However, growth in
housing starts and new home sales are expected to decelerate
further as erosion in affordability becomes more pronounced as the
cycle matures. Fitch projects total housing starts will grow 6.4%
in 2018 and 1.7% in 2019, with single-family starts advancing 7.5%
and 4% in 2018 and 2019, respectively. New home sales are forecast
to increase 7% this year and 4% in 2019, while existing home sales
are forecast to fall 1% in 2018 and remain flat in 2019.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

MHO's ratings reflect the company's execution of its business model
in the current housing environment, its conservative land policies,
management's demonstrated ability to manage land and development
spending, healthy liquidity position, and stable credit metrics.
Risk factors include the cyclical nature of the homebuilding
industry, the company's somewhat limited geographic diversity, and
MHO's relatively high speculative inventory levels.

MHO's credit metrics, including debt/EBITDA of 4.2x,
EBITDA/interest incurred of 3.7x and net debt/cap of 46.7%, is
comparable as 2Q'18 to that of KB Home (BB-/Stable), with
debt/EBITDA of 4x, interest coverage of 3.8x and net debt/cap of
49.3%. MHO's credit metrics have been more stable during the past
few years compared with KB Home. KB Home's revenues are more than
2x that of MHO, has better EBITDA margins and is more
geographically diversified with operations across 35 markets in 7
states compared to MHO's operations in 16 markets across 10 states.
While MHO has more speculative housing inventory, the company
controls more than 50% of its lots through options and has an
owned-lot position of 2.5 years based on LTM deliveries. On the
other hand, KBH owns about 75% of its total lots and has a 3.3 year
owned lot supply.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  - Total housing starts increase 6.4% in 2018 and low
single-digits in 2019, with single-family starts advancing 7.5% in
2018 and 4% in 2019. New home sales are forecast to grow 7% in 2018
and 4% in 2019. Existing home sales are projected to fall 1% in
2018 and remain flat in 2019;

  - MHO's homebuilding revenues grow 15%-16% in 2018 (including the
acquisition of Pinnacle Homes) and increases 6%-7% in 2019;

  - Homebuilding EBITDA margins remain relatively stable at around
8.5% during the forecast period;

  - MHO is modestly CFFO negative in 2018 after spending $575
million to $625 million on land and development activities;

  - Debt/EBITDA settles below 4x, interest coverage is above 3.7x
in 2018 and 2019, while net debt/capitalization is about 46% at
year-end 2018 and below 45% at the end of 2019.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  - The company increases its size and/or further enhances its
geographic diversification and local market leadership;

  - MHO commits to maintaining net debt/capitalization below 45%
and the company's net debt/capitalization ratio is consistently at
or below 40%.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  - There is sustained erosion of profits due to either weak
housing activity, meaningful and continued loss of market share,
and/or ongoing land, materials and labor cost pressures, resulting
in margin contraction and weakened credit metrics (including net
debt/capitalization consistently approaching 50%) and the company
continues to maintain an aggressive land and development spending
program, leading to diminished liquidity position.

  - If MHO's liquidity position (cash plus revolver availability)
falls sharply and cannot cover maturities over the next two years
and any cash flow shortfall in the next 12 months, this would also
pressure the rating.

LIQUIDITY

Healthy Liquidity Position: As of June 30, 2018, MHO had $66.5
million of unrestricted cash and $268.6 million of borrowing
availability under its revolving credit facility ($181.8 million
outstanding). The company has sufficient liquidity to cover working
capital needs in the intermediate term. During 2Q'18, MHO exercised
the accordion feature under its credit facility and increased the
total commitment to $500 million from $475 million.

Debt Maturities: As of June 30, 2018, MHO has no major debt
maturities until 2021, when $300 million of sr. notes mature. The
company has occasionally accessed the capital markets in recent
years. In December 2015, MHO issued $300 million of 6.75% sr. notes
due 2021. In August 2017, MHO issued $250 million of 5.625% sr.
notes due 2025.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has upgraded the following rating for M/I Homes, Inc,:

  -- Long-term IDR upgraded to 'BB-' from 'B+'.

Fitch has also affirmed the following ratings for M/I Homes:

  -- Senior unsecured notes at 'BB-'; revised the recovery rating
to 'RR4' from 'RR3';

  -- Unsecured revolver at 'BB-'; revised the recovery rating to
'RR4' from 'RR3'.

The Rating Outlook was revised to Stable from Positive.


MARK A ELLIS: Judges Signs Final Cash Collateral Order
------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Shelley d. Rucker of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Tennessee has signed a final order authorizing
Mark A. Ellis, DMD, PLLC, to use the cash collateral subject to the
lien of Bank of America.

The Debtor will be entitled to use cash collateral for actual and
necessary expenses shown on the Budget. The usage period will be
extended through Sept. 28, 2018 (which is the last date for which
the budget has been provided), but may be extended by written
agreement of the Debtor and Bank of America.

The Debtor will make an adequate protection payment to Bank of
America in the amount of $1,250 per month. The adequate protection
is conditioned upon proof of validity, perfection and
non-avoidability of the prepetition security interest.

In addition, the Debtor will maintain full insurance coverage on
the collateral, which also protects the interests of Bank of
America. The Debtor will also allow Bank of America access to the
collateral for the purposes of inspecting its condition.

A full-text copy of the Final Order is available at

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/tneb18-11917-52.pdf

                   About Mark A. Ellis, D.M.D.

Mark A. Ellis, D.M.D., PLLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Case No. 18-11917) on April
30, 2018.  In the petition signed by Mark A. Ellis,
owner/president, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $100,000
and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge Shelley D. Rucker
presides over the case.


MOEINI CORP: Bailey Buying Pensacola Property for $315K
-------------------------------------------------------
Moeini Corp. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Alabama to authorize the sale of the real property and
improvements thereon known as 2471 E. Nine Mile Road, Pensacola,
Florida, and certain items of equipment attached to said building
owned by the Debtor to James C. Bailey, Jr. or his designee or
$315,000 plus those closing costs for which the Purchaser is
responsible.

At the time of the filing of its Chapter 11 proceeding, the Debtor
owned the property, subject to a mortgage in favor of Hancock Bank
which mortgage secures a debt owed to Hancock Bank.  In addition,
said property cross-collateralizes other debts owed by the Debtor
to Hancock Bank with balances totaling an amount in excess of the
value of said property.

The Debtor has received an offer to purchase said property free and
clear of liens together with a $5,000 earnest money deposit paid to
the Debtor's Agent from James R. Ingram, Jr., for an amount equal
to $315,000, free and clear of liens, plus the Purchaser's share of
closing costs for which he is responsible.  The Debtor has agreed
to accept said offer, subject to the Court's approval.  The Debtor
is of the opinion that the proposed purchase price is fair and
reasonable for the property.  The proposed closing sale is Sept.
14, 2018.

From the gross sales proceeds, the Debtor proposes to pay (1) all
closing costs and fees required to be paid by the Seller under the
terms of the Purchase Agreement, including a real estate commission
of 4% of the sales price, (2) the amount of $4,875 to Irvin Grodsky
P.C.'s IOLTA account to be used to pay the Chapter 11 quarterly
fees for the calendar quarter during which the sale is closed, and
(3) and the balance to Hancock Bank to pay the note secured by the
property and towards other secured debts owed by the Debtor to
Hancock Bank.

A copy of the Purchase Agreement attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Moeini_Corp_182_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser:

          James C. Bailey, Jr.
          P.O. Box 916
          Robertsdale, AL 36567
          Telephone: (251) 533-6250
          Facsimile: (251) 947-2808

                    About Moeini Corporation

Moeini Corporation is a franchisee of IHOP restaurants with
locations in the Alabama and Florida market.  The Debtor sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.
Ala. Case No. 17-04073) on October 26, 2017.  Mehdi Moeini, its
president, signed the petition.  At the time of the filing, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.


MRPC CHRISTIANA: Sets Sale Procedures for All Assets
----------------------------------------------------
MRPC Christiana, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey to authorize the bidding procedures in
connection with the sale of substantially all assets at auction.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Sept. 11, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.

The Debtor is the owner of the Four Points by Sheraton Newark
Christiana Wilmington hotel located at 56 South Old Baltimore Pike,
Newark, Delaware.  Since April 17, 2018, pursuant to Order by the
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, the business
operations and decisions have been made at 27 Prince Street,
Elizabeth, New Jersey.  The Hotel employs approximately 45
full-time and part time employees.

The Debtor intends to conduct an extensive and open marketing
process, under a three-phase process that it has already started.
Assisting in this three-phase process is Madison Hawk Partners,
LLC, doing business as Madison Hawk, which specializes in
accelerated real estate solutions.  In connection with this
process, the Debtor has already sought authority from the Court to
retain Madison Hawk as its broker.

Phase One of the sale process includes gathering due diligence and
preparing marketing material.  The Debtor has already started the
process with Madison Hawk.  Phase Two of the sale process includes
marketing of the Hotel, educating potential buyers and permitting
the buyers to inspect the Hotel.  Madison Hawk intends to target
marketing to national and regional hotel owners and management
companies, real estate funds, foreign investors, private equity and
hedge funds, and other brokers.  The marketing process with include
electronic, print and social media campaigns, direct soliciting and
other public relations.  The proposed listing terms are annexed to
the Motion as Exhibit B.  Finally, Phase Three of the sale process
includes the bid deadline, auction and closing on the transaction.

Within three days after entry of the Bidding Procedures Order, the
Debtor will serve the Sale Notice, along with the Bidding
Procedures Order and the Bidding Procedures, upon all Notice
Parties.  

The Listing Terms are:

     a. Property: Four Points by Sheraton, Wilmington Christiana
Newark 56 South Old Baltimore Pike Road, Newark, Delaware

     b. Seller: MRPC Christiana, LLC

     c. Broker/Auctioneer: Madison Hawk Partners, LLC, doing
business as Madison Hawk

     d. Proposed Bid Deadline: 8 weeks following the Chapter 11
filing

     e. Sale Structure: Sealed Bid, with the possibility for a
run-off Open Outcry Auction

     f. Marketing Budget: $50,000 to fund a local, regional and
national marketing program. This is a complete pass through and is
completely used to market the property.  A detailed budget will be
provided, as well as an accounting at the conclusion of the
program.

     g. Credit Bid Fee: 1% of any Credit Bid

     h. Buyer's Premium: 5% of the High Bid Price

     i. Commission: 4% of the High Bid Price, payable at closing.

     j. Note: Madison Hawk will be responsible for paying a 1% fee
to any Cooperating Broker.

The proposed Sale satisfies the sound business judgment test.  The
Debtor believes that the proposed sale process for the Hotel and
the Bidding Procedures present the best opportunity to allow the
Hotel to continue to exist and to realize the maximum value of the
Debtor's assets for the benefit of its estates, their creditors and
other parties in interest.

The Debtor's secured creditor, Crown Bank, will be permitted to
credit bid up to the amount of the judgment it obtained in the
Superior Court of the State of Delaware captioned MRPC Christiana
LLC v. Crown Bank, C.A., No. NlSC-02-010 EMD.  The Judgment in the
Delaware Action was in the amount of $20,023,082, including accrued
interest, penalties and attorneys' fees as of the Petition Date.

The Debtor further asks that the Bankruptcy Court authorizes the
Sale of the Hotel free and clear of all Encumbrances, with such
Encumbrances to attach to the proceeds of the Sale of the Hotel.

The Trustee asks the Court to waive the stay requirements under
Rule 6004(h) in connection with the sale of the Property.

A copy of the Listing Terms attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/MRPC_Christiana_15_Sales.pdf

                    About MRPC Christiana

Based in Elizabeth, New Jersey, MRPC Christiana, LLC, filed for
relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case
No. 18-26567) on Aug. 17, 2018.  At the time of filing, the Debtor
estimated $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Trenk DiPasquale Della Fera & Sodono, P.C., led by
Richard D. Trenk, represents the Debtor.


NATURE'S SECOND CHANCE: Seeks Sept. 21 Exclusive Period Extension
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Nature's Second Chance Hauling LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Illinois to extend its exclusive
period to file a proposed Plan of Reorganization through and
including Sept. 21, 2018 and its exclusive period for obtaining an
Order of Confirmation of a Plan through and including Nov. 29,
2018.

The Court previously granted the Debtor through and including Aug.
31, 2018, to file a plan of liquidation and disclosure statement.

The Debtor contends that since filing its voluntary case, it has
become apparent that it has no prospects for reorganization, but
instead, it must seek recovery from parties which the Debtor
believes are liable to it for the destruction of its business and
diversion of its cash and other assets.

Accordingly, the Debtor has commenced adversary proceedings to
recover funds and to assert claims for damages against Group KLT,
Inc., KLT Industries, Inc., KLT Logistics, Inc., and KLT Transport,
LLC. In addition, the Debtor has commenced an action against
International Paper seeking recovery of an account receivable.

Since filing its case, the Debtor has undertaken significant
efforts to commence the aforesaid litigation and investigate
numerous claims and causes of action. In light of the nature of its
case, the Debtor believes it will be appropriate for it to file a
plan of liquidation that will provide for creation of a litigation
trust into which proceeds from litigation the Debtor pursues will
be deposited and distributed to creditors.

              About Nature's Second Chance Hauling

Nature's Second Chance Hauling, LLC, based in Alton, Illinois, is a
privately-held company that provides specialty trucking services to
a number of Fortune 500 Companies throughout the United States.

Nature's Second Chance Hauling sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ill. Case No. 18-30328) on
March 19, 2018.  

In the petition signed by Vern Van Hoy, managing member, the Debtor
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.

The Debtor tapped Heplerbroom LLC as its legal counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 10 on April 25, 2018, appointed two
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case.  The committee members are: (1) Ryder
System, Inc.; and (2) Hogan Truck Leasing, Inc.


NINE WEST: Needs More Time for Continuance of Plan Negotiations
---------------------------------------------------------------
Nine West Holdings, Inc. and its debtor-affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to extend
the Debtors' exclusive periods to file a chapter 11 plan by 45 days
through and including October 29, 2018, and to solicit votes
thereon by an additional 45 days through and including December 28,
2018.

The Debtors claim that they have made significant progress towards
their restructuring, but more work remains. The Debtors, therefore,
seek an extension of their exclusive periods to file and solicit a
chapter 11 plan to ensure sufficient time to maximize value for all
their stakeholders.

The Debtors tell the Court that over the past month, they have:

      (a) negotiated and executed over 10 non-disclosure agreements
with holders of claims throughout their capital structure,
including those holding unsecured term loans and unsecured notes,
permitting principal-level restructuring discussions among
constituencies;

      (b) facilitated such discussions by arranging numerous
in-person meetings with holders and/or their advisors, the Debtors
and/or their advisors, and the members of the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors and/or the advisors to the Committee;

      (c) reached agreement with the Committee regarding an
extension through September 6, 2018, of a standstill period to
allow ongoing negotiations and the continuance of investigations
into the 2014 buyout transaction and related carve-out transactions
and certain intercompany claims, without the distraction of
potential litigation related to the plan confirmation process;

      (d) continued the reconciliation of their claims pool through
both the continued review of filed claims and the filing of an
omnibus claims objection procedures motion, filed contemporaneously
herewith;

      (e) focused on operational goals related to their office
lease footprint, including negotiating and executing a joint lease
amendment regarding the Debtors' leased office space, which,
subject to Court approval, will save the Debtors approximately $1.5
million per year; and

      (f) engaged with their key constituencies regarding the
implementation of a key employee retention plan, which, subject to
Court approval, will help the Debtors maintain their business
operations in the ordinary course during the pendency of these
prolonged chapter 11 cases.

As demonstrated by these efforts, the Debtors tells the Court that
they have been engaged in direct, constructive discussions with
many of their key stakeholder groups and/or their advisors,
including the Committee, the Ad Hoc Secured Group, the Ad Hoc
Crossover Group, Brigade, and the Ad Hoc Noteholder Group, in an
effort to achieve, if reasonably possible, a global resolution
among such groups regarding the Debtors' ultimate path to emergence
from chapter 11.

The Debtors believe that the requested continuation of the
Exclusivity Periods will permit the continuance of these
negotiations and discussions without the risk of jeopardizing the
progress made to date. Maintaining their exclusive right to file
and solicit votes on a chapter 11 plan is critical to the Debtors'
ability to complete this process and achieve their restructuring
goals as efficiently and expeditiously as possible without the risk
of substantial additional costs and disruption that could
significantly hinder their efforts at this critical juncture.

                         About Nine West

Nine West Holdings Inc. is a footwear, accessories, women's
apparel, and jeanswear company with a portfolio of brands that
includes Nine West, Anne Klein, and Gloria Vanderbilt.  The company
is a wholesale partner to major U.S. retailers and has
international licensing arrangements covering more than 1,200
points of sale around the world.

In April 2014, Sycamore Partners Management, L.P., acquired The
Jones Group Inc. for $2.2 billion via leveraged buyout.  As part of
the transaction, The Jones Group merged with several affiliates,
and the newly merged company was renamed as Nine West Holdings.

On April 6, 2018, Nine West Holdings, Inc., and 10 affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
18-10947) to right size their balance sheet, sell the Nine West
Group's assets, and execute on their turnaround strategy to
concentrate exclusively on their One Jeanswear Group, Kasper Group,
The Jewelry Group, and Anne Klein businesses.

In addition to the chapter 11 cases, Jones Canada, Inc., and Nine
West Canada LP commenced foreign insolvency proceeding under the
Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act in Canada.

The Hon. Shelley C. Chapman is the U.S. case judge.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as counsel; Lazard Freres &
Co. as investment banker; Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC as
interim management and financial advisory services provider;
Consensus Advisory Services LLC and Consensus Securities LLC as
investment banker in connection with the sale of intellectual
property associated with the Nine West and Bandolino brands;
Deloitte Tax LLP as tax services provider; and BDO USA, LLP, as
auditor and accountant.

Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP is serving as the company's independent
counsel, rendering services at the direction of independent
directors Alan Miller and Harvey Tepner.  Berkeley Research Group
is serving as independent financial advisor, rendering professional
services at the direction of the Independent Directors.

Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent.

The Ad Hoc Group of Secured Term Loan Lenders tapped Davis Polk &
Wardwell LLP as counsel; and Ducera Partners LLC as financial
advisor.

The Ad Hoc Crossover Group of Secured and Unsecured Term Loan
Lenders tapped King & Spalding LLP as counsel and Guggenheim
Securities, LLC, as financial advisor.

Brigade Capital Management, LP, a party to the RSA tapped Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP as counsel.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors tapped Akin Gump
Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP as counsel; Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc.,
as investment banker; and Protiviti Inc. as financial advisor and
forensic accountant.

Sycamore Partners Management, L.P., owner of 90.2% of the equity
interests in the debtors, tapped Proskauer Rose LLP as counsel.

Authentic Brands, which bought Nine West's IP assets, tapped DLA
Piper Global Law Firm as counsel.

                          *     *     *

The Debtors filed a Chapter 11 plan that's based on a restructuring
support agreement signed with certain members of the Secured Lender
Group, certain members of the Crossover Group, and Brigade, who
collectively hold over 78 percent of the company's secured term
loan and over 89 percent of the unsecured term loan.

In an auction on June 8, 2018 for the company's Nine West,
Bandolino and associated brands, brand developer and marketing
company Authentic Brands Group outbid shoe retailer DSW Inc.  The
winning bid of Authentic Brands' ABG-Nine West LLC was $340 million
in cash and other consideration, which is $140 million more than
ABG's stalking horse bid.

The official committee of unsecured creditors has filed a motion
seeking to conduct an examination of and seek discovery from the
Debtors and third parties pursuant to Rule 2004 of the Federal
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.  The Committee says its initial
investigation indicates there are a number of potential estate
claims arising from the 2014 LBO.


PLASTIC2OIL INC: Extends $3 Million Notes Maturity to Dec. 1
------------------------------------------------------------
Plastic2Oil, Inc., has entered into an agreement with Mr. Richard
Heddle, the Company's chief executive officer and a member of the
Company's Board of Directors, to extend the maturity date of the
outstanding $1 million principal amount 12% Secured Promissory Note
due Aug. 31, 2018 to Dec. 1, 2018.  Mr. Heddle originally purchased
Note 1 from the Company on Aug. 29, 2013 in the Company's private
placement of 12% Secured Promissory Notes due Aug. 31, 2018.

On Aug. 29, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr.
Heddle to extend the maturity date of the outstanding $2 million
principal amount 12% Secured Promissory Note due Sept. 30, 2018 to
Dec. 1, 2018.  Mr. Heddle originally purchased Note 2 from the
Company on Sept. 30, 2013 in the Company's private placement of 12%
Secured Promissory Notes due Sept. 30, 2018.

                        About Plastic2Oil

Plastic2Oil, Inc. is an innovative North American fuel company that
transforms unsorted, unwashed waste plastic into ultra-clean,
ultra-low sulphur fuel without the need for refinement.  The
Company's patent-pending Plastic2Oil (P2O) is a proprietary,
commercially viable, and scalable process designed to provide
immediate economic benefit for industry, communities, and
government organizations faced with waste plastic recycling
challenges.

Platic2Oil incurred a net loss of $1.47 million in 2017 and a net
loss of $5.70 million in 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Plastic2oil
had $1.52 million in total assets, $14.64 million in total
liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of $13.11 million.

In their report dated April 2, 2018 with respect to the Company's
consolidated financial statements for the years ended Dec. 31,
2017, D. Brooks and Associates CPA's, P.A., in Palm Beach Gardens,
Florida, the Company's independent registered public accounting
firm since 2014, expressed substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.  The auditors stated that
the Company has incurred operating losses, has incurred negative
cash flows from operations and has a working capital deficit.
These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.


POPLAR CREEK: Exclusive Plan Period Extended Through Dec. 31
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. LaShonda A. Hunt of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois, at the behest of Poplar Creek, LLC,
has extended the Exclusive Periods to file and to obtain
acceptances of its Plan to and including December 31, 2018 and
February 28, 2019 respectively.
The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor sought extension of the Exclusive Periods in order to
facilitate its efforts in completing its Chapter 11 case, pursuing
an exit strategy from this Chapter 11 case and resolving issues
with First American Bank.

The Debtor said that it has been diligently pursuing the
administration of this Chapter 11 case with a view toward
formulating a prompt exit strategy, and currently defending against
Motions filed by First American Bank relating to relief from the
automatic stay and for designation of the Debtor as a "single asset
real estate debtor."

First American Bank's Motions are currently scheduled for a status
hearing before the Court on September 6, 2018. The Court's rulings
on the Bank's Motions will have much to do with the type of exit
strategy from this Chapter 11 case that can be formulated and
implemented.

The Debtor told the Court that it is also engaged in discussions
with third parties over the development and construction of the
Hotel Project as well as with respect to the possibility of the
sale of the Property, in whole or in part. These discussions
require additional time to develop into offers that would form the
cornerstone of any Plan. The Debtor has also recently approached
First American Bank about a settlement that would incorporate one
or more of these possibilities.

                      About Poplar Creek

Poplar Creek, LLC, is a privately-held company that owns the
property located at 2401 West Higgins Road, Hoffman Estates,
Illinois.  Poplar Creek sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 18-14161) on May 15,
2018.  In the petition signed by George M. Moser, manager, the
Debtor estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge LaShonda A. Hunt
presides over the case.  Burke, Warren, MacKay & Serritella, P.C.,
serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.


RED FORK (USA): Sets Bidding Procedures for All Assets
------------------------------------------------------
Red Fork (USA) Investments, Inc., and EastOK Pipeline, LLC, ask the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas to
authorize the bidding procedures in connection with the sale of
substantially all assets at auction.

The Debtors' primary assets are located in Kay, Noble, Pawnee,
Payne and Wagoner Counties in Oklahoma.  In total, the Debtors own
working interests in approximately 38,000 net acres of oil and gas
interests overlying the Woodford and Mississippian Lime formations
in northern Oklahoma ("Oil and Gas Interests"), consisting
primarily of approximately 33,000 acres in the Big River producing
area located in Noble, Payne and Pawnee Counties, and approximately
5,000 acres in the Wagoner producing area located in Wagoner County
("Wagoner Assets").

Pursuant to a Services and Operating Agreement ("SOA"), Trey
Resources, Inc. is the contract operator for the Oil and Gas
Interests.  EastOK owns and/or operates infrastructure supporting
the Oil and Gas Interests.  Its assets include 18 salt water
disposal ("SWD") wells (11 located in the Big River area and 7
located in the Wagoner area), more than 160 miles of high-density
polyethylene pipeline for transporting gas, and over 30 miles of
three-phase electrical power lines providing electrical service to
individual wells.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors had long-term secured debt in
excess of $120 million owing under the Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of Feb. 10, 2015 among Red Fork, as the
borrower, the lenders from time to time party to the Credit
Agreement, and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative
agent and collateral agent for the Prepetition Lenders.  The
Debtors' indebtedness and other obligations under the Credit
Agreement and all related loan and security documents are secured
by liens and security interests in favor of the Prepetition Agent
and Prepetition Lenders in and upon substantially all of the
Debtors' existing and after-acquired assets, as more particularly
set forth in the Indebtedness Documents ("Prepetition
Collateral").

The decline in commodity prices, significant operational
disruptions to the Debtors' business, and litigation expenses have
forced a change in their strategy.  They're now asking to sell some
or all of their assets to a potential purchaser with the ability to
pursue further development of the Oil and Gas Interests.

The Debtors, in consultation with their counsel, proposed sales
agent PLS Energy Advisors, Inc., contract operator Trey Resources,
and Prepetition Lenders, have determined that the auction and sale
process described herein is the optimal procedure for effectuating
a sale of the Assets.  The Debtors believe that the Sale
contemplated by the Bidding Procedures is the best way to maximize
the value of the Assets for their estates and creditors.

First, to provide for the orderly Sale of the Assets, the Debtors
ask the immediate entry of the Sale Procedures Order (a)
authorizing and approving the Bidding Procedures, (b) authorizing
and approving the Assumption and Rejection Procedures, (c)
approving the form and manner of notice of the respective dates,
times, deadlines (including objection deadlines) and places in
connection with the Sale of the Assets, (d) scheduling the Sale
Hearing, and (e) granting related relief.

Second, following the entry of the Sale Procedures Order, the
solicitation of Bids according to the Bidding Procedures, and the
Auction (if applicable), at the Sale Hearing the Debtors will
request the entry of the Sale Order, in a form to be filed by the
Debtors no later than eight days prior to the Sale Hearing: (a)
authorizing and approving the Sale or Sales of the Assets free and
clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances and other interests to the
Successful Bidder, (b) authorizing the assumption and assignment or
rejection of certain executory contracts and unexpired leases, and
(c) granting related relief.

The Debtors respectfully ask that the Court sets the Sale Hearing
for Nov. 6, 2018, or the earliest date thereafter that the Court's
calendar can accommodate.  At the Sale Hearing, the Debtors intend
to ask entry of a Sale Order approving the Sale or Sales of the
Assets free and clear of (a) all liens.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Oct. 19, 2018

     b. Initial Bid: Prior to the commencement of the Auction, the
Debtors, in consultation with the Prepetition Agent, will determine
which Qualified Bids constitute the highest or otherwise best Bids

     c. Deposit: 10% of the purchase price proposed in the
Qualified APA

     d. Auction: In the event the Debtors determine, in
consultation with the Prepetition Agent, to conduct an Auction, the
Auction will take place on Oct. 26, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. (Dallas
Time) at the offices of Dykema Gossett PLLC, 1717 Main
Street, Suite 4200, Dallas, Texas.

     e. Bid Increments: Subject to the Minimum Overbid, Qualified
Bidders will submit successive Overbids in increments to be
determined by the Debtors in consultation with the Prepetition
Agent at the Auction for the purchase of the Assets for which it is
bidding.

     f. Sale Hearing: Nov. 6, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. local Austin time

     g. Credit Bidding: The Prepetition Agent is deemed a Qualified
Bidder, and will have the right to make an initial credit bid on
behalf of the Prepetition Lenders or any of their assignees or
designees, for all or a portion of any outstanding amounts owing
under the Indebtedness Documents, at any time on or before the
commencement of the Auction, and thereafter make subsequent Credit
Bids at the Auction, and such bid or bids will be deemed to be a
Qualified Bid(s).

    h. General Objection Deadline: Oct. 30, 2018 at 4:00 p.m.
(Austin Time)

Within three businesss day of the entry of the Sale Procedures
Order, the Debtors will serve the Sale Notice upon all parties as
required by Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 6004, 6006, and 9014.  

As part of the Sale, the Debtors ask authority to assume and assign
the Desired 365 Contracts to the Successful Bidder(s).  They
propose to serve the Assumption and Assignment Notice as soon as
practicable after the entry of the Sale Procedures Order and ask
that the Court approves their Assumption and Assignment Procedures.
Unless the Contract Counterparty or any other entity properly
files an objection to the supplemental Assumption and Assignment
Notice in accordance with the General Objection Procedures, within
10 days of the date of the supplemental Assumption and Assignment
Notice, the Debtors may assume and assign the Assumed and Assigned
Contract, subject to the occurrence of the closing of the Sale(s),
without further of the Court or notice of hearing.

The Debtors ask that the Court approves the Sale or Sales of the
Debtors' Assets to the Successful Bidder(s) (or Backup Successful
Bidder(s), as the case may be) free and clear of all Claims and
Interests.

A copy of the Bidding Procedures attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Red_Fork_58_Sales.pdf

An expeditious closing of the Sale is necessary and appropriate to
maximize value for the estates.  Accordingly, the Debtors ask the
Court to waive the 14n-day stay period under Bankruptcy Rules
6004(h) and 6006(d).

               About Red Fork (USA) Investments and
                         EastOK Pipeline

Red Fork (USA) Investments, Inc., and EastOK Pipeline, LLC, are in
the business of oil and gas drilling and exploration with various
assets located in Oklahoma.

Red Fork and EastOK sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case Nos. 18-70116 and 18-70117)
on Aug. 7, 2018.  In the petitions signed by Eugene I. Davis,
president and sole Board member, each debtor estimated assets of
$10 million to $50 million and liabilities of $100 million to $500
million.  Judge Tony M. Davis presides over the cases.  The Debtors
tapped Dykema Cox Smith as their legal counsel.


RHA/AFFORDABLE HOUSING: S&P Cuts Ratings on 2012A/A-T Bonds to BB+
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its rating to 'BB+' from 'BBB-' on
Public Finance Authority, Wis.' multifamily rental housing revenue
bonds. series 2012A and 2012A-T, issued on behalf of Columbia
Affordable Housing LLC, Tenn., and Winston Affordable Housing LLC,
N.C., for Columbia Meadows Apartments and Winston Summit
Apartments. RHA/Affordable Housing II, Ga., is the sole managing
member of both LLCs. The outlook is negative.

"The rating change reflects our view of the project's continued
weak financial performance, as reflected by recent coverage of
maximum annual debt service coverage; a decline in gross potential
rent for Winston Summit Apartments, due to a reduction in the rent
schedule for the property from the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development; and highly vulnerable loss coverage on the
bonds," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Jose Cruz.

S&P said, "Partially offsetting the weaknesses is our view of the
high Real Estate Assessment Center scores, indicative of the good
physical condition of the properties. Furthermore, the management
team has engaged a consultant to prepare a report recommending
appropriate steps to satisfy the bonds' coverage test.

"The negative outlook reflects our opinion of the project's
continued declining financial performance, which has dropped for
the third consecutive year, with fiscal 2017 maximum annual debt
service (MADS) coverage of 1.05x and three-year average MADS
coverage of 1.06x. Due to the reduction in the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development's rent allocation for the Winston
Summit Apartments, we believe that the project's financials could
continue to experience pressure during the two-year outlook period.
Furthermore, based on a management consultant report, we project
financial performance will remain commensurate with the
noninvestment-grade rating category during the two-year outlook
period."

Should the project's financial performance and debt service
coverage continue to decline, which could occur due to an increase
in vacancy or a significant increase in expenses, S&P could lower
the rating on the bonds.

Conversely, should the project's overall financial performance
stabilize and improve, S&P could revise the outlook to stable.


ROSE ESKANDARI: Has $1.1 Million Offer for Manassas Property
------------------------------------------------------------
Movant Ryan Eskandari, creditor and co-owner of certain assets of
Rose Eskandari, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia to authorize the sale of the real property
located at 9019 Centreville Road, Manassas, Virginia to Monavar
Vakili and James L. Eisberg for $1,125,000.

The Debtor and the Movant are joint owners in fee of 9019.  During
the course of the case, they've been approached by prospective
purchasers of 9019, expressing interest in acquiring said asset for
cash consideration.  Following negotiation, a written Purchase and
Sale Agreement constituting an offer was received from the Buyers,
husband and wife, whose address is 4001 Woodland Road, Annandale,
Virginia, for a purchase price of $1,125,000, to be paid in full,
in cash, at closing.

The sale proposed is free and clear of all liens, claims and
encumbrances, with such liens, claims and encumbrances, if any are
not paid and discharged at the closing of the sale under the Offer,
to attach to the net sales proceeds generated by said sale.

A copy of the amended contract for the sale attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Rose_Eskandari_220_Sales.pdf

It appears that 9019 is encumbered by a first mortgage held by Tom
and Farzaneh Dashtaray, with an approximate balance due of $875,000
(per its filed Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay.  It
appears that Prince William County, Virginia, has a lien for unpaid
real estate taxes against 9019 in an amount believed to be less
than $10,000.  The total encumbrances against 9019 are believed to
not exceed $900,000.

Within five business days of the Effective Date, the Buyers will
deposit $56,250 as earnest money, to be held by Chicago Title
Insurance Co., as the escrow agent, pursuant to an escrow agreement
by and among, the Sellers, the Purchasers and the Escrow Agent.

The Price is more than sufficient to pay these encumbrances in full
at closing; unless the claim(s) is disputed, these secured claim(s)
will be paid at closing of the sale to the Buyers from the proceeds
of the sale.

The Debtor and the Movant believe and therefore aver that the
proposed sale of 9019 on the terms and conditions set forth in the
Offer are fair, reasonable, reflective of fair market value, and of
substantial net value to the estate; accordingly, they believe and
therefore aver that the sale should be approved.

Rose Bernadine Eskandari sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.
Va. Case No. 16-14261) on Dec. 19, 2016.

Counsel for the Debtor can be reached at:

          Steven H. Greenfeld, Esq.
          COHEN BALDINGER & GREENFELD, LLC
          2600 Tower Oaks Boulevard, Suite 103
          Rockville, MD 20852
          Telephone: (301) 881-8300
          E-mail: steveng@cohenbaldinger.com


S & S SENIOR: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
------------------------------------------------------
No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of S & S Senior Housing of Panama City LLC as
of August 31, according to a court docket.

            About S & S Senior Housing of Panama City

S & S Senior Housing of Panama City LLC sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.  N.D. Fla. Case No.
18-50214) on July 26, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
disclosed that it had estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge Karen K. Specie presides
over the case.


SEVEN STARS: Becomes Largest Shareholder in DBOT
------------------------------------------------
Seven Stars Cloud Group, Inc. (to be renamed Ideanomics) (NASDAQ:
SSC) and DBOT announced that FINRA has approved SSC's ownership
stake in DBOT.

The deal involved a cashless share swap involving SSC's shares with
those of the current owners of DBOT and will see SSC take a seat on
DBOT's Board of Directors as part of the agreement.

"We fully recognize the strategic value of Alternative Trading
Systems in the wake of regulation on digital assets and general
alternative asset classes," said Bruno Wu, Chairman and CEO, of
Seven Stars Cloud.  "This is underscored by the SEC's Alternative
Trading System (ATS) List, which continues to grow with new market
entrants.  We are extremely pleased that we have received this
approval from FINRA, which allows us to take a meaningful ownership
stake in the DBOT ATS."

John F. Wallace, Chairman and CEO of DBOT states "We are extremely
pleased that this deal has closed following FINRA's approval of
SSC's ownership stake.  We are very happy to welcome the SSC team
into the DBOT family and we look forward to working with them to
help develop our business further in what is an exciting time for
ATS business activities."

The Company said any intended change to the status of DBOT will be
in compliance with NASD Rule 1017 - Application for Approval of
Change in Ownership, Control, or Business Operations.

                       About Seven Stars

Seven Stars Cloud Group, Inc., formerly Wecast Network, Inc. --
http://www.sevenstarscloud.com/-- is aiming to become a next
generation Artificial-Intelligent (AI) & Blockchain-Powered,
Fintech company.  By managing and providing an infrastructure and
environment that facilitates the transformation of traditional
financial markets such as commodities, currency and credit into the
asset digitization era, SSC provides asset owners and holders a
seamless method and platform for digital asset securitization and
digital currency tokenization and trading.  The company is
headquartered in Tongzhou District, Beijing, China.

Seven Stars reported a net loss of $10.19 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of $28.50 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Seven Stars had
$153.6 million in total assets, $117.5 million in total
liabilities, $1.26 million in convertible redeemable preferred
stock, and $34.77 million in total equity.

B F Borgers CPA PC's report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, contains an
explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt regarding the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The auditors
stated that the Company incurred recurring losses from operations,
has net current liabilities and an accumulated deficit that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


SEVEN STARS: Changes Business Name to Ideanomics
------------------------------------------------
Seven Stars Cloud Group, Inc., announced the adoption of Ideanomics
as its new business name subject to shareholder approval.

The use of the new name for the Company is aligned with the
Company's vision and mission for transforming traditional assets
and their associated industries into the asset digitization era.
For more information on the Company's overview, mission and
approach please visit the following post on the Company's blog.

"Next-generation technologies such as blockchain and artificial
intelligence have begun to unlock capabilities in intelligent
prediction and trust mechanics by providing enhanced transparency,
security, and traceability, while simultaneously making the data
smarter," said Bruno Wu, executive chairman & CEO.  "The
combination of the 'idea' and the "field of economics," yields
Ideanomics - a new paradigm and model for solving problems,
creating efficiencies, and more equitably distributing wealth and
knowledge.  Ideas create value.  With ideas, there is a future.
Ideanomics, we are digitizing tomorrow!"

Shares of Ideanomics will continue to trade on Nasdaq using the
Company's existing ticker symbol SSC until further notice.  The
Company will launch a new corporate website and domain that
reflects its updated Ideanomics branding following shareholder
approval.

                        About Seven Stars

Seven Stars Cloud Group, Inc., formerly Wecast Network, Inc. --
http://www.sevenstarscloud.com/-- is aiming to become a next
generation Artificial-Intelligent (AI) & Blockchain-Powered,
Fintech company.  By managing and providing an infrastructure and
environment that facilitates the transformation of traditional
financial markets such as commodities, currency and credit into the
asset digitization era, SSC provides asset owners and holders a
seamless method and platform for digital asset securitization and
digital currency tokenization and trading.  The company is
headquartered in Tongzhou District, Beijing, China.

Seven Stars reported a net loss of $10.19 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of $28.50 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Seven Stars had
$153.6 million in total assets, $117.53 million in total
liabilities, $1.26 million in convertible redeemable preferred
stock, and $34.77 million in total equity.

B F Borgers CPA PC's report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, contains an
explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt regarding the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The auditors
stated that the Company incurred recurring losses from operations,
has net current liabilities and an accumulated deficit that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


SEVEN STARS: Inks Joint Venture For Real Estate Asset Digitization
------------------------------------------------------------------
Seven Stars Cloud Group, Inc., has entered into a a joint venture
with I-House (IHT) parent company Aladdin Fintech Company Limited,
focusing on global real estate asset digitization and
post-digitization services.

The 50/50 joint venture will be led by IHT, the firm which
successfully launched the world's first real estate token offering
in 2017.  The JV, which will be established in Hong Kong and
include offices in New York and Beijing, will be led CEO Ricky Ng,
a serial entrepreneur whose career includes former Head of
Technology for Yahoo! in China, as well as several successful
ventures which resulted in acquisitions.

The JV will focus on three primary areas of business activities:

   1. Fixed income-based Real Estate product offerings using
      Velocity Ledger for global fractionalization,
      securitization, and tokenization offerings, starting with
      the cashflow-producing commercial properties of large
      insurance companies as underlying assets.  The former
      Chairman of China Life and China Property and Casualty
      Insurance, and SSC Board Member, Yang Chao will serve as
      special advisor to the business.

   2. Velocity Ledger-based fractionalization, securitization, and
      tokenization of Real Estate projects and services.

   3. Ideanomics' BBD Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance Real

      Estate ratings and risk management services.

Bruno Wu, Chairman of Ideanomics, stated "We are tremendously
excited to announce our JV with IHT, this deal creates a powerhouse
of technology and expertise in the area of Real Estate asset
digitization and associated services.  Together with Ricky Ng's
talented team, we will bring to market a full service for asset
digitization that will enable the unlocking of value in property
holdings in a manner which will provide unprecedented liquidity and
accessibility for both the asset holders and the investor community
alike."

Ricky Ng, chairman and founder of IHT, said, "This deal is
significant for the commercial Real Estate market, as it brings
together two companies which between them provide the full value
chain and an unwavering focus on execution.  This JV will help
further establish the market for asset digitization of Real Estate
and will serve as a benchmark for an industry which has
traditionally suffered from high asset value but very limited
opportunities to unlock liquidity.  By partnering with Ideanomics,
IHT has access to the types of technology and deal flow that we are
certain will be successful for our companies, our clients, and
investors looking for opportunities in real estate."

                         About Seven Stars

Seven Stars Cloud Group, Inc., formerly Wecast Network, Inc. --
http://www.sevenstarscloud.com/-- is aiming to become a next
generation Artificial-Intelligent (AI) & Blockchain-Powered,
Fintech company.  By managing and providing an infrastructure and
environment that facilitates the transformation of traditional
financial markets such as commodities, currency and credit into the
asset digitization era, SSC provides asset owners and holders a
seamless method and platform for digital asset securitization and
digital currency tokenization and trading.  The company is
headquartered in Tongzhou District, Beijing, China.

Seven Stars reported a net loss of $10.19 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of $28.50 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Seven Stars had
$153.57 million in total assets, $117.53 million in total
liabilities, $1.26 million in convertible redeemable preferred
stock, and $34.77 million in total equity.

B F Borgers CPA PC's report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, contains an
explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt regarding the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The auditors
stated that the Company incurred recurring losses from operations,
has net current liabilities and an accumulated deficit that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


SPECIALTY BUILDING: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Specialty Building Products
Holdings, LLC's B2 Corporate Family Rating and B2-PD Probability of
Default Rating following the company's announcement that it is
acquiring Alexandria Moulding. In a related rating action, Moody's
assigned a B3 rating to the company's proposed $500 million senior
secured term loan due 2025. The $220 million of the proceeds from
the new term loan will be used to fund the acquisition of
Alexandria Moulding. The balance of proceeds will be used to repay
the company's existing senior secured term loan due 2023, at which
time its B3 rating will be withdrawn, and to pay related fees and
expenses. The new term loan will have similar terms and conditions
as those to the existing term loan, with the exception of maturity
and potentially pricing. The rating outlook is stable.

U.S. Lumber is acquiring Alexandria Moulding Holdings, LP from
affiliates of International Operating Partners for approximately
$220.4 million, excluding fees and expenses. The acquisition of
Alexandria Moulding, which management indicates is a leading
manufacturer and two-step distributor of moldings and accessories,
expands U.S Lumber's scale and footprint into Canada with new
customers and product offerings, and increases exposure to repair
and remodeling activity while reducing reliance on new home
construction. With pro forma sales of nearly $1.2 billion, U.S.
Lumber now has size, product breadth and geographic reach that
should contribute to cost efficiencies with both suppliers and
customers.

U.S. Lumber's debt capital structure will consist of a $100 million
senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (unrated)
expiring in 2023 with about $17 million outstanding for working
capital needs at closing, a $500 million senior secured term loan
due 2025, and a small amount of equipment notes. Balance sheet debt
is climbing to about $520 million from approximately $260 million
at 2Q18 dated June 30, 2018. Closing is expected in October 2018.

The following ratings/assessments are affected by Moody's's action:


Affirmations:

Issuer: Specialty Building Products Holdings, LLC

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B2-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B2

Assignments:

Issuer: Specialty Building Products Holdings, LLC

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned B3 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Specialty Building Products Holdings, LLC

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Specialty Building Products Holdings, LLC's B2 Corporate Family
Rating remains appropriate at this time, since Moody's expects
improving debt credit metrics due to a combination of better
earnings from volume growth, operating leverage, and debt
reduction. Moody's projects revenues growing to slightly more than
$1.2 billion over the next 12 to 18 months mainly due to higher
volumes from end market demand. Moody's forecasts operating margins
in the low-single digit percentages, resulting in interest
coverage, measured as EBITA-to-interest expense, nearing 3.0x. Debt
leverage is trending towards 5.6x by calendar year-end 2019.
Leverage improvement comes from a combination of higher levels of
earnings, and a lower amount of balance sheet debt. Its forward
view includes repayment of revolver borrowings and some term loan
from free cash flow. Moody's projects free cash flow-to-debt in low
single digit percentages as well. All ratios incorporate Moody's
standard adjustments. U.S. Lumber has an extended maturity profile;
its revolving credit facility expires in 2023, followed by its
senior secured term loan maturing in 2025, affording it financial
flexibility to contend with its leveraged capital structure.

Fundamentals for repair and remodeling activity, the main source of
pro forma revenues and resulting earnings and cash flows, remain
sound. Its performance expectations for the repair and remodeling
end market considers trends in the National Association of Home
Builders (NAHB) Remodeling Market Index, an industry survey that
gauges remodeling contractors' expectations of demand over the next
three months. The Remodeling Market Index's overall reading was
58.4 in 2Q18, above 50 since 1Q13 and indicating sustained growth.
An index reading above 50 indicates a majority of contractors
surveyed believe market conditions are expanding. Over the next 12
to 18 months, Moody's anticipates the overall reading indicating
ongoing expansion, which bodes well for U.S. Lumber.

New home construction, another key source of pro forma revenues, is
growing steadily. Moody's projects total new housing starts could
reach 1.27 million in 2018, representing a 6% increase from about
1.20 million in 2017. Moody's maintains a positive outlook for the
domestic homebuilding industry. Moody's believes Canadian housing
market is less volatile than US market, creating more earnings
stability in a downturn.

However, risks remain despite solid fundamentals in end markets,
and improving debt credit metrics. U.S. Lumber's debt capital
structure remains leveraged, constraining ratings. Markets in which
U.S. Lumber operates are highly fragmented and competitive with
other distributors and manufacturers. This competition could result
in lower sales, prices, volumes and margins, which would adversely
affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.
Although fundamentals are sound now, US residential construction is
very cyclical. Its embedded volatility poses a significant credit
risk. This market could contract quickly and have a substantive
negative impact on the company's financial profile, especially due
to its low-margin business. The company is now susceptible to
foreign exchange fluctuations, creating potential volatility in
earnings which may distort operating performance. The company's
private equity ownership creates risk of another large debt-funded
acquisitions and distributions, which could impact U.S. Lumber's
long-term ratings if such actions result in significant
deterioration of credit metrics. First quarter results of U.S.
Lumber with Alexandria Moulding will not be known until end of May
2019, when company is required to file its first quarterly
financial statement. The company will file 2018 audited financial
statements around same time.

The stable rating outlook reflects its expectations that U.S.
Lumber's credit profile will remain supportive of its B2 Corporate
Family Rating over the next 12 to 18 months, while seamlessly
integrating Alexandria Moulding and previous acquisitions.

Positive rating actions over the next 12 to 18 months are unlikely
due to the company's leveraged capital structure. However, U.S.
Lumber's ratings could be upgraded over the longer-term if
operating performance exceeds Moody's forecasts, with credit
metrics such as debt-to-EBITDA below 4.0x (ratio includes Moody's
standard adjustments), better liquidity profile characterized by
more free cash flow generation used for permanent debt reduction,
and ongoing positive trends in end markets. Moody's would also need
up-to-date financial statements, showing actual levels of sales,
earnings, and resulting debt credit metrics, and validating U.S.
Lumber's performance.

Negative rating actions could ensue if U.S. Lumber's operating
performance falls below its expectation, resulting in
debt-to-EBITDA remaining above 5.5x, EBITA-to-interest expense
trending below 1.5x (all ratios incorporate Moody's standard
adjustments), deterioration in liquidity profile, large
debt-financed acquisitions, or significant shareholder
distributions.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Distribution &
Supply Chain Services Industry published in June 2018.

Specialty Building Products Holdings, LLC dba as U.S. Lumber,
headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, distributes building materials
throughout the Southeast, Mid Atlantic and East Coast of the United
States, and Canada. U.S. Lumber operates as a two-step distributor,
buying and reselling a large variety of specialty products mostly
to national and other one-step distributors. Madison Dearborn
Partners, through its affiliates, is primary owner of U.S. Lumber.
U.S. Lumber is privately-owned and does not disclose publicly
available financial information.


SUNGARD AVAILABILITY: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable & Affirms ICR
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its rating outlook on Wayne, Pa.-based
Sungard Availability Services Capital Inc. to stable from negative.
S&P also affirmed its 'CCC+' issuer credit rating on the company.

S&P said, "At the same time, we affirmed our issue-level rating on
the company's senior secured first-lien debt at 'B-'. The '2'
recovery rating is unchanged, indicating our expectation for
substantial (70% to 90%; rounded estimate: 80%) recovery in the
event of a payment default.

"In addition, we affirmed our issue-level rating on the company's
senior unsecured notes due 2022 at 'CCC-'. The '6' recovery rating
is unchanged, indicating our expectation of negligible (0% to 10%;
rounded estimate: 5%) recovery in the event of a payment default.

"The outlook revision reflects our view that Sungard AS does not
face imminent default risk following its debt maturity extension to
2021 and 2022 from 2019 and has stabilized its ability to meet
near-term financial commitments because of slowing negative cash
outflows and adequate liquidity sources over the next 12 months.
While we expect total cash outflows (including one-time charges) to
be about negative $35 million in 2018, the roll-off of high
one-time charges related to its debt refinancing and restructuring
over previous quarters should support liquidity over the next 12
months. In addition, the company bolstered cash balances from
approximately $15 million of net asset sale proceeds (after
mandatory debt reduction) received in the second quarter, keeping
cash balances somewhat flat from the first quarter of 2018 at about
$96 million as of June 30, 2018. Finally, we do not believe the
company faces near-term refinancing risk, which partially supported
our negative outlook previously. In January 2018, the company
extended $417 million of outstanding term loans due 2019 to 2022.
Sungard AS' next significant maturity wall occurs in 2021, when
about $461 million of outstanding term loans are due.

"The stable outlook on Sungard AS reflects our expectation that its
negative cash outflows will slow over the next 12 months because
high one-time cash charges related to its previous debt refinancing
and restructuring activity will abate. The outlook also reflects
our view that the company will maintain interest coverage of 1.5x
and have about $120 million of liquidity from existing sources to
meet its financial obligations over this period.

"We could lower the rating to 'CCC' if we believed the company were
likely to default because of a near-term liquidity crisis or
consider a distressed debt exchange within 12 months. A liquidity
crisis could stem from higher-than-expected cash restructuring
expenses or an inability to offset revenue declines through cost
reductions, leading to weak interest coverage below 1x, or a
negative cash burn of $45 million to $50 million.

"We could raise the rating to 'B-' if the company's operating
performance improved such that it experienced
stronger-than-expected bookings leading to revenue growth, EBITDA
expansion, and positive FOCF generation on a sustained basis."



TOWER BONDING: A.M. Best Lowers Fin'l. Strength Rating to B-(Fair)
------------------------------------------------------------------
A.M. Best has downgraded the Financial Strength Rating to B- (Fair)
from B (Fair) and the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating to "bb-" from
"bb" of Tower Bonding and Surety Company (Tower Bonding) (Old San
Juan, PR). The outlook of these Credit Ratings (ratings) remains
negative.

The ratings reflect Tower Bonding's balance sheet strength, which
A.M. Best categorizes as adequate, as well as its marginal
operating performance, limited business profile and marginal
enterprise risk management.

The rating actions reflect a significant decline in Tower Bonding's
policyholder surplus, primarily driven by unrealized capital losses
in 2017 and the continued deterioration in underwriting performance
over the past five years. The deterioration in underwriting results
was largely due to the company's high underwriting expense
structure, along with a sizable decline in its premium volume. The
reduction in premium volume was reflective of the lower demand for
criminal bonds. However, in first half of 2018, the company's
premium volume has increased for the first time in more than 10
years due to a lack of competition.

There could be additional negative rating action if there is a
further decline in the operating results, or a material weakening
in Tower Bonding's risk-adjusted capitalization. Positive rating
action in a form of an outlook change could occur if the company's
underwriting and operating performance stabilizes.


TRACY CLEMENT: Trustee Selling Fillmore/Mower Properties at Auction
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip L. Kunkel, Chapter 11 Trustee for Tracy John Clement, asks
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota to
authorize the sale of the jointly owned real properties located in
Fillmore and Mower Counties, Minnesota at auction.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Sept. 18, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.  The
objection deadline is Sept. 13, 2018.

The Jointly-Owned Properties are legally described as follows:

     a. Parcel No. 33.0134.000 - 33.85 acres - Miller 75 Property

     b. Parcel No. 33.032.000 - 79 acres - Miller 80 Property

     c. Parcel Nos. 09.023.0010, 09.023.031, and 09.026.0010 - Nolt
Property - (i) Parcel No. 09.023.0010 – 120 acres; (ii) Parcel
No. 09.023.0031 – 80 acres; and (iii) Parcel No. 09.026.0010 –
199.90 acres

The Jointly-Owned Properties consist of approximately 512 acres of
agricultural land located in Mower County and Fillmore County,
Minnesota.  It is necessary to sell the Jointly-Owned Properties at
a time when purchasers can have access to the land for the 2019
crop year.

The liquidation of the Debtor's nonexempt Jointly-Owned Properties
and personal property has been the objective of the creditors,
including the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors throughout
the pendency of the case.  The sale of the Jointly-Owned Properties
is included in the upcoming fall sale schedule for Steffes Auction
Group, Inc.

The Trustee, in consultation with Steffes, asks authority to offer
the Jointly-Owned Properties in parcels or tracts which he believes
will realize the highest bids by prospective purchasers.  All
bidding will be conducted at the Auction and the Trustee will
accept no bids after the Auction has concluded.

Within two business days after the conclusion of the Auction, the
Trustee will file a report with the Court setting forth the name of
the Successful Bidder and the amount of the bid selected as the
Successful Bid for each parcel offered at the Auction.  On the date
the Auction Report is filed with the Court, the he will serve the
Auction Report on the counsel for the Debtor, the holders of each
lien affecting any of the Real Property or their respective
counsel, the counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors, and the Office of the United States Trustee.  The filing
of the Auction Report will initiate the Debtor's 15-day period to
exercise the ROFR on each Parcel for which a Successful Bid was
reported.

In order to exercise the ROFR on any parcel sold at the Auction, on
15 days following the filing of the Auction Report, the Debtor will
(a) provide written notice to the Trustee of his intention to
exercise the ROFR on the specific Parcel and (b) remit to the
Trustee a nonrefundable deposit of 10% of the amount of the
Successful Bid for the specific Parcel in certified or immediately
available funds.

Within five business days following the expiration of the ROFR, the
Trustee will file a motion with the Court on an expedited basis
asking one or more orders of the Court approving the sale of each
parcel to the Successful Bidder for that Parcel or, if the Debtor
has properly and timely exercised the ROFR for a specific Parcel,
to the Debtor for that specific Parcel, and authorizing the Trustee
to close all such sales.

Each Successful Bidder will close the sale(s) of its respective
Parcel(s) no later than 30 days after the expiration of the ROFR if
the Debtor does not properly and timely exercise the ROFR with
respect to that Successful Bidder's respective Parcel(s).  The
Debtor will close the sale(s) of the Parcel(s) for which the Debtor
has properly and timely exercised the ROFR no later than 65 days
after the filing of the Auction Report.

By the Motion, the Trustee is seeking an order of the Court
authorizing the sale of (a) the Debtor's interest in the
Jointly-Owned Properties free and clear of all liens, claims and
encumbrances; and (b) free of the co-ownership interest of Conrad.

By a companion Motion for Summary Judgment in the pending adversary
proceeding brought by the Trustee, Kunkel v. Conrad D. Clement, et
al, Adv. No. 18-03020, the Trustee is asking a final order
authorizing the sale of the Jointly-Owned Properties.  The purpose
of the instant motion is to establish sales procedures for the sale
of both the estate's interest in the Jointly-Owned Properties as
well as Conrad's interest in such real property.

The Trustee believes the estate's interest in the Jointly-Owned
Properties may be subject to various mortgages of record held by
Cresco Union State Bank ("CUSB Bank") and Citizen's State Bank of
Hayfield ("CSB").  The various mortgages are identified, on a
parcel-by-parcel basis, in Exhibit B.  The Trustee understands that
CUSB and CSB have consented to the sale of the Jointly-Owned
Properties.  

The Trustee is asking authority to sell the Jointly-Owned
Properties without obtaining access or control over any sales
proceeds attributable to Conrad's interest in such proceeds.
Rather, he is asking an order which authorizes such sale subject to
the requirement that one-half of the net sales proceeds (defined to
be the amount remaining from the gross sales proceeds less the
costs of any surveys, permits, taxes and other usual and customary
closing expenses derived from the sale of the Jointly-Owned
Properties) be retained by a title company engaged by the Trustee
pending a determination of the priority of all such mortgages and
liens on Conrad's interest in the Jointly-Owned Properties by a
court of competent jurisdiction or agreement of the parties.

The Jointly-Owned Properties may be further subject to the rights
of first refusal provided the Debtor pursuant to a Memorandum of
Understanding approved by the Court on March 20, 2017.  The Trustee
has reviewed such rights with the secured creditors and understands
the secured creditors recognize the estate's interest in the
Jointly-Owned Properties may be subject to such rights.  Such
rights do not accrue to the Debtor until the Trustee has sold the
Jointly-Owned Properties.

The proceeds of the liquidation of the Jointly-Owned Properties
will be distributed after further order of the Court, after the
payment of the costs and expenses of sale, to the holders of
secured claims against each parcel sold, if any, in accord with
applicable nonbankruptcy law, with the balance retained by the
Trustee for the benefit of unsecured creditors.

Finally, the Trustee asks the Court to waive the 14-day stay of the
order otherwise required under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004(h) to make
the order effective immediately.

A copy of the Auction Terms attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Tracy_Clement_740_Sales.pdf

                    About Tracy John Clement

Tracy John Clement sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Minn. Case No. 16-31189) on April 11,
2016.  The Debtor tapped James C. Brand, Esq., at Fredrikson &
Byron PA, as counsel.

On May 3, 2016, the Office of the United States Trustee appointed
an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.

On Sept. 19, 2017, Phillip L. Kunkel was appointed as the Chapter
11 Trustee for the Debtor.  The attorneys for the Trustee are:

         Abigail M. McGibbon, Esq.
         P. Jason Thibodeaux, Esq.
         Abigail M. McGibbon, Esq.
         GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A.
         500 IDS Center
         80 South Eighth Street
         Minneapolis, MN 55402
         Tel: 612-632-3484
         Fax: 612-632-4000
         E-mail: jason.thibodeaux@gpmlaw.com
                 abigail.mcgibbon@gpmlaw.com

The Trustee retained Steffes Group, Inc., as auctioneer.


TREATMENT CENTER: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended Through Oct. 16
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Erik P. Kimball of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida, at the behest of The Treatment Center
of the Palm Beaches, LLC, has extended Debtor's exclusive period
within which to file a plan and disclosure statement through
October 16, 2018, together with the exclusive period within which
to solicit acceptances of said plan through December 17, 2018.

                  About The Treatment Center of
                      The Palm Beaches LLC

The Treatment Center of the Palm Beaches, LLC, located in West Palm
Beach, Florida -- https://www.thetreatmentcenter.com/ -- is an
addiction treatment center whose mission is to transform the lives
of every individual and family member that walks through its doors.
Since 2009, the Treatment Center has offered custom treatment
programs for drugs, alcohol, trauma, mental health, and other
addictions.

The Treatment Center of the Palm Beaches filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-14622) on April 19, 2018.
In the petition signed by Judi Gargiulo, manager, the Debtor
disclosed $11.07 million in total assets and $6.12 million in total
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Erik P. Kimball.
Robert C. Furr, Esq., at Furr & Cohen, is the Debtor's counsel.


UNITED AIRLINES: Fitch Affirms 'BB' IDR, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Issuer Default Rating (IDR) for
United Continental Holdings, Inc. (United, UAL) and its airline
operating subsidiary, United Airlines, Inc. at 'BB'. The Rating
Outlook is Stable. Fitch has also upgraded the class B certificates
for United's 2014-2 and 2012-2 series of enhanced equipment trust
certificates (EETCs) to 'BBB+' from 'BBB' and affirmed the ratings
for United's other outstanding enhanced equipment trust
certificates (EETCs).

The ratings affirmation reflects an improving unit revenue
environment and United's solid operational and financial
performance relative to peers over the past year, offset by weaker
margins and credit metrics mainly driven by higher fuel costs.
Fitch forecasts that credit metrics may deteriorate slightly in the
near-term as the company works to pass higher fuel costs through to
passengers, but metrics are expected to improve beyond 2018. Fitch
calculates United's total adjusted debt/EBITDAR at 3.9x as of June
30, 2018 and expects leverage to drift slightly above 4x by year
end. Fitch's expectations for medium-term adjusted leverage metrics
in the mid-to-high 3x range, EBITDAR margins sustained in the upper
teens, and prospects for improving FCF are all supportive of the
'BB' rating.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Weaker Margins in 2018: Higher fuel costs are masking otherwise
positive performance at United. The company continues to show
improvement in its operations. On-time performance rates and flight
cancellations now rival the best operators among North American
peers. Non-fuel unit costs have been flat through the first part of
the year and the demand environment remains strong across almost
all regions. Nonetheless, Fitch expects operating margins to
decline for the third year in a row in 2018, primarily due to a
sharp uptick in fuel prices. Assuming an average price of
$2.25/gallon, Fitch expects United's total fuel bill to increase by
more than $2 billion this year. Continued macroeconomic strength
should allow much of the increase to pass to consumers, but fuel
weighs heavily on margins in the near-term.

Higher Near-term Leverage: Weaker margins will push United's
leverage higher in the near term, but Fitch expects leverage
metrics to trend lower beginning in 2019. The expected improvement
is driven by a sustained solid demand environment, improving RASM
partially driven by United's strategic growth initiatives, and
benefits of on-going efforts to control non-fuel costs. Fitch
calculates United's adjusted debt/EBITDAR at 3.9x as of June 30,
2018; flat with where it stood at YE 2017 but up from 3.0x at YE
2016. Adjusted leverage may rise above 4x by YE 2018, which is one
of Fitch's negative rating sensitivities, however, a temporary
spike in leverage is not unexpected due to the rapid run-up in fuel
prices over the past year. Total debt levels, which have risen in
recent years, will likely continue to trend upwards over the next
several years driven by borrowing to fund aircraft purchases.

Improving Operational Performance: United's efforts to improve its
operational performance are proving effective as the company
reports better on-time arrival rates. Through the first five months
of the year (based on the latest data available), United posted an
on-time performance better than most of its peers aside from Delta
and Alaska. In addition to being beneficial to travellers, better
operational performance is allowing United to reduce some of its
block times and to utilize its aircraft more efficiently, which
plays into its cost control efforts.

Solid Non-Fuel Cost Performance: Higher fuel prices are squeezing
profit margins in 2018, but non-fuel cost pressures are lower this
year. Fitch's forecast includes non-fuel cost per available seat
mile (CASM) that is roughly flat in both 2018 and 2019. The company
is getting some benefit of its on-going cost initiatives, which
have included items like improving economics throughout its supply
chain, increasing efficiency in maintenance practices, etc. Higher
numbers of fuel efficient aircraft in the fleet, such as the 787
and 737 MAX are also contributing to lower unit costs.

Improving Unit Revenue Environment: Unit revenues are broadly
improving after remaining weak throughout 2016 and much of 2017.
Rising unit revenues reflect a strong demand environment across
nearly all regions along with carriers' efforts to pass higher fuel
costs through to customers. Barring any unexpected macroeconomic
weakness, Fitch expects United's unit revenues to remain on an
upward trajectory through 2018 and into 2019. Along with a solid
demand environment, United is benefitting from its efforts toward
increasing connectivity at its mid-continent hubs as it increases
regional flying to smaller cities and re-banks its operations in
Chicago and Denver. United also re-banked its Houston hub in the
fall of 2017.

United Growing Faster than Peers: United articulated a strategic
initiative in early 2018 aimed at improving connectivity and
driving better profitability at its mid-continent hubs through
increased regional flying. As a result, United expects its total
available seat miles (ASMs) to grow by 4.5-5.0%, the top end of
which is down from its January guidance of 4-6%, but still above
its network peers. American plans to grow ASMs by about 2.2% in
2018 and Delta will grow by about 3%. United's plans represent a
minor concern due to the potential to drive weaker unit revenues
and higher costs from flying more regional jets. However, early
results have been positive, with United reporting some of its
strongest results out of its mid-continent hubs through the first
half of the year.

Positive FCF: Fitch expects United to generate positive FCF through
the forecast period, assuming relatively flat fuel prices and
barring material macroeconomic downturns. FCF in 2018 will benefit
from lower capital spending. The company expects capital
expenditures to range between $3.6 billion-$3.8 billion in 2018,
down from over $4.9 billion in 2017, which represented a period
heavy with aircraft deliveries. Fitch expects capex to increase
again in 2019, partly driven by United's recent regional jet order.
Higher capex should be partly offset by margin improvement and
continued top-line growth driven by a robust demand environment.

EETC Ratings: Fitch's senior EETC tranche ratings are primarily
based on a top-down analysis of the level of overcollateralization
(OC) featured in each transaction. Fitch's stress analysis uses an
approach assuming the rejection of the entire pool of aircraft in a
severe global aviation downturn. The stress scenario incorporates a
full draw on the liquidity facility, an assumed 5%
repossession/remarketing cost, and various stresses to the value of
the collateral.

Based on updated appraisal information incorporated into Fitch's
analysis, the level of OC in each of United's EETCs has remained
relatively flat over the past year. Fitch's stress scenario LTVs
decreased marginally for UAL 2016-1, 2014-1, 2013-1, and 2012-2,
primarily due to slower year-over-year depreciation on models like
the 737-900ER. LTV ratios for the other transactions have
deteriorated slightly. Each of these transactions continues to pass
Fitch's 'A' category stress test, while the UAL 2018-1, UAL 2016-2
and 2016-1 'AA' certificates continue to pass Fitch's 'AA' stress
test by a healthy margin. Certain transactions such as United
2013-1 maintain limited headroom within Fitch's 'A' category stress
tests as underlying collateral values for the 737-900ER have
depreciated by more than Fitch's expectations over the past several
years, making those transactions more vulnerable to potential
future downgrades.

The B tranche ratings are notched from the 'BB' IDR of the
underlying airline. Fitch notches subordinated tranche ratings from
the airline IDR based on three primary variables; 1) the
affirmation factor (0-2 notches for airlines rated in the 'BB'
category), 2) the presence of a liquidity facility, (0-1 notch),
and 3) recovery prospects. The B tranches rated 'BBB' reflect a two
notch uplift based on a high affirmation factor (Fitch's judgment
on the likelihood that United would affirm the pool of aircraft in
a potential bankruptcy) and a one notch uplift for the presence of
a liquidity facility. Fitch considers the affirmation factor for
all EETCs covered in this release to be high. The transactions
rated 'BBB+' receive one additional notch of uplift for superior
recovery prospects. Fitch's upgrade of the 2012-2 and 2014-2
reflect improved recovery prospects based on principal amortization
and adequate performance for the underlying aircraft values.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

United's 'BB' rating is in between the ratings of its two major
network rivals, Delta Air Lines (BBB-) and American Airlines (BB-).
The ratings distinction between the three airlines is reflective of
the financial strategies adopted by each airline. For instance,
following its merger with Northwest Airlines, Delta aggressively
de-leveraged its balance sheet and now maintains a leverage ratio
of 2.2x, compared with 3.9x for United. American Airlines on the
other hand, has adopted a more aggressive financial policy,
borrowing heavily to finance new aircraft deliveries while
simultaneously sending material amounts of cash to shareholders via
share repurchases. As such, American's debt levels have risen since
it exited bankruptcy and it now maintains an adjusted leverage
metric of just over 5x. The 'BB' category ratings for both United
and American reflect material improvements to financial metrics in
the years since the 2008/2009 recession when they were rated 'B' or
lower. For instance, UAL posted an EBIT margin of 9% for the LTM
period ended June 30, 2018, up from an average of 5.9% for the
period between 2010-2013.

EETC Derivation:

The certificates rated 'AA' are in line with Fitch's ratings on
senior classes of EETCs issued by American, Spirit and Air Canada.
Fitch believes that this transaction compares well with recent
precedents. Stress scenario LTVs for 2018-1 are marginally higher
than other certificates rated 'AA', though the UAL 2018-1
transaction retains adequate headroom within the 'AA' stress
scenario to support the rating. The collateral pool also compares
well with other transactions rated 'AA'. Stress scenario LTVs for
the 2016-1 and 2016-2 class 'AA' certificates are in-line with 'AA'
rated peers. Collateral pools for those two transactions are
marginally weaker than some peers due to their concentrations of
777-300ERs, but this risk is offset by United's underlying credit
strength and a high affirmation factor. Class A certificates that
are rated 'A' compare well with issuances from American, Air
Canada, and British Airways that are also rated 'A'. Rating
similarities are driven by similar levels of overcollateralization
and high quality pools of collateral. Fitch rates certain class A
certificates from American and Delta 'A-' or in the 'BBB' category
where levels of overcollateralization are weaker.

The 'BBB' or 'BBB+' ratings on the class B certificates are derived
through a three or four-notch uplift from United's IDR. Other class
B certificates issued by 'BB' category rated airlines generally
receive either three or four notches of ratings uplift, with the
difference in notching based on generally higher recovery prospects
in a 'BB' level stress scenario for the class B certificates that
receive four notches.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for the issuer
include:

  -- Capacity growth of 4.8% in 2018 (in line with management
guidance) followed by low single digit annual capacity growth
thereafter;

  -- Continued moderate economic growth for the U.S. over the near
term, translating to steady, moderate growth in demand for air
travel;

  -- Jet fuel prices of around $2.25/gallon through the forecast
period, equating to Brent crude prices of around $70/barrel;

  -- Low-to-mid single digit revenue per available seat mile (RASM)
improvement 2018 followed by low single digit growth in 2019, and
flat results in 2020.


RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- Adjusted debt/EBITDAR sustained around 3.0x;

  -- FFO fixed-charge coverage sustained above 3.5x;

  -- FCF as a percentage of revenue sustained in the mid-single
digits;

  -- Continued improvements in United's operational performance;

  -- Continued evidence of improving unit revenues.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- Adjusted debt/EBITDAR sustained above 4.0x;

  -- EBITDAR margins deteriorating into the low double digit
range;

  -- Persistently negative or negligible FCF.

LIQUIDITY

Sufficient Liquidity: As of June 30, 2018, United maintained
approximately $7.1 billion in total liquidity including full
availability under its $2.0 billion revolver. Liquidity as a
percentage of LTM revenue was 18.1%, which is considered adequate
for the ratings, particularly given Fitch's expectations that UAL
will generate significant cash flow from operations over the next
several years. Maturities of long-term debt and capital leases
total roughly $400 million for the rest of 2018, $1.3 billion in
2019 and $1.3 billion in 2020. Fitch considers United's debt
maturities to be manageable given its current liquidity balance,
expectations for the company to turn FCF positive in 2018 and the
flexibility afforded by the company's share repurchase program. UAL
has sizable capital spending requirements in the coming years, but
the majority of capital spending consists of new aircraft
deliveries, which are readily financeable through bank loans, the
EETC market, or through sale-leasebacks. Therefore Fitch does not
expect capital spending to strain liquidity. The company also
maintains a sizable and growing base of unencumbered assets that
can be tapped to raise funds if needed in the case of a downturn.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

United Continental Holdings, Inc.

  -- IDR at 'BB';

  -- Senior unsecured notes at 'BB'/'RR4'.

United Airlines, Inc.

  -- IDR at 'BB';

  -- Secured term loan and revolver at 'BB+'/'RR1'.

United Airlines Pass Through Trust Series 2018-1

  -- Class AA Certificates at 'AA';

  -- Class A Certificates at 'A';

  -- Class B Certificates at 'BBB'.

United Airlines Pass Through Trust Series 2016-2

  -- Class AA Certificates at 'AA';

  -- Class A Certificates at 'A';

  -- Class B Certificates at 'BBB'.

United Airlines Pass Through Trust Series 2016-1

  -- Class AA Certificates at 'AA';

  -- Class A Certificates at 'A';

  -- Class B Certificates at 'BBB'.

United Airlines Pass Through Trust Series 2014-2

  -- Class A Certificates at 'A'.

United Airlines Pass Through Trust Series 2014-1

  -- Class A Certificates at 'A';

  -- Class B Certificates at 'BBB'.

United Airlines Pass Through Trust Series 2013-1

  -- Class A Certificates at 'A';

  -- Class B Certificates at 'BBB'.

Continental Airlines Pass Through Trust Series 2012-2

  -- Class A Certificates at 'A'.

Fitch has upgraded the following ratings:

United Airlines Pass Through Trust Series 2014-2

  -- Class B Certificates to 'BBB+' from 'BBB'.

Continental Airlines Pass Through Trust Series 2012-2

  -- Class B Certificates to 'BBB+' from 'BBB'.


URBAN OAKS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Urban Oaks Builders LLC
        1001 McKinney St., Suite 2100
        Houston, TX 77002

Business Description: Urban Oaks Builders LLC is a privately
                      held company that provides residential
                      building construction services.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 31, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas (Houston)

Case No.: 18-34892

Judge: Hon. Marvin Isgur

Debtor's Counsel: Matthew Scott Okin, Esq.
                  OKIN & ADAMS LLP
                  1113 Vine Street, Suite 201
                  Houston, TX 77002
                  Tel: 713-228-4100
                  Fax: 888-865-2118
                  Email: mokin@okinadams.com
                         info@okinadams.com

Debtor's
Special
Litigation
Counsel:          BAKER BOTTS LLP

Debtor's
Financial
Advisor:          STOUT RISIUS ROSS, LLC

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $50 million to $100 million

The petition was signed by Todd Hagood, vice president, authorized
representative.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb18-34892.pdf

List of Debtor's 20 Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
Cottington Road TIC, LLC              Litigation       $45,000,000

8230 210th Street, South
Boca Raton, FL 33433
Michael A. Hornreich
Tel: 407.734.7000
Email: mhornreich@wwhgd.com

Baker Concrete                        Trade Debt        $1,321,671
Construction Inc.
900 N. Garver Rd
Kimberley Smith Sr Admin.
Monroe, OH 45050
Tel: 513.310.8111
Email: smithki@bakersharedservices.com

GH Phipps Construction Companies      Trade Debt          $963,277
5995 Greenwood
Plaza Blvd., #100
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
Brent Chacon
Tel: 303.389.3774
Email: brent.chacon@ghphipps.com

Power Design Inc.                     Trade Debt          $822,902
11600 Ninth Street North
St. Petersburg, FL 33716
Sam Khayat
Tel: 727.497.1930
Email: wkhayat@powerdesigninc.us

Rocky Mountain                        Trade Debt          $615,121
Prestress LLC
5801 Pecos Street
Denver, CO 80221
Brian Miller
Tel: 720.387.1326
Email: millerb@rmprestress.com

RSL Contractors                       Trade Debt          $595,844
22030 Mossy Oaks Drive
Spring, TX 77389
Susan Lyons
Tel: 281.651.1133
Email: slyons@rslcontractors.com

Momentum Exterior Systems, Inc.       Trade Debt          $510,081
3440 Riley Fuzzel
Rd. Suite 120 #85
Spring, TX 77386
John Shaddix
Tel: 281.809.2830
Email: john.shaddix@momentum-glass.com

Steel Huggers, LLC                    Trade Debt          $339,419
4472 Hilltop Rd., Unit D
Mead, CO 80504
Nic Malwitz
Tel: 870.535.4460
Email: steelhuggers@comcast.net

T&D Moravits & Co., LLC               Trade Debt          $303,471
10511 Shaenfield Road
San Antonio, TX 78251
Katy Maddox
Tel: 210.688.3482
Email: kmaddox@tdmoravits.com

Jimmy Evans Company                   Trade Debt          $182,681
Email: kcarrillo@jimmyevans.com

Hofer Builders Inc.                   Trade Debt          $180,480
Email: thofer@hoferbuilders.com

AGL Construction Company              Trade Debt          $171,690
Email: kate@algconstruct.com

Schindler Elevator Corporation        Trade Debt          $167,126
Email: decek-paluch@schindler.com

AYG Construction, LTD                 Trade Debt          $152,282
Email: Agolan@aygconstruction.com

Fuquay, Inc.                          Trade Debt          $140,760
Email: jtrevilion@fuquay.com

Construction Risk                     Trade Debt          $126,628
Partners, LLC
Email: rrapp@constructionriskpartners.com

Steel Designs Inc.                    Trade Debt          $111,933
Email: nmacias@steeldesignsinc.com

Hines Interests                       Trade Debt          $106,905
Limited Partnership
Email: Evan.McCord@hines.com

Ovation Plumbing Inc                  Trade Debt           $98,914
Email: jplatt@ovationplumbing.com

Kone Inc                              Trade Debt           $73,440
Email: steven.buhr@kone.com


VERTIV GROUP: S&P Cuts Issuer Credit Rating to B, Outlook Negative
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings downgraded Columbus, Ohio-based Vertiv Group
Corp. (parent holding company of Vertiv Co.) to 'B' from 'B+'. The
outlook is negative.

S&P said, "At the same time, we lowered our issue-level ratings on
the company's secured term loan to 'B' from 'B+', its senior
unsecured notes to 'B-' from 'B', and its unsecured payment-in-kind
(PIK) toggle notes at Vertiv Intermediate Holding Corp. to 'CCC+'
from 'B-'.

"The downgrade reflects our view that Vertiv's credit measures are
unlikely to recover to levels appropriate for the previous rating
within the next year. Vertiv provides critical power systems,
uninterruptible power supply units, and other products to data
centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial
facilities. Despite high growth in data-center power consumption
and the company's good 5% organic growth in the second quarter,
Vertiv's adjusted EBITDA margins contracted by 80 basis points
(bps) in the quarter and by 240 bps in the first six months of
2018. While the company is making traction on various operational
initiatives initiated in 2017 to reduce procurement and labor
costs, other headwinds combine to offset those benefits and
pressure Vertiv's profitability. These include material and freight
cost inflation; unfavorable product mix; and investments in
channel, digital infrastructure, and stand-alone enterprise costs.


"Our negative outlook reflects the 1-in-3 potential that we may
lower our ratings on Vertiv during the next year if the company
does not improve its credit ratios to more acceptable levels for
the rating. The company's adjusted-debt-to-EBITDA ratio remaining
above 7x with unclear prospects for improvement could prompt a
downgrade. This scenario could arise if operational improvements
are delayed or go not fully realized, the cost environment remains
challenging or worsens, and if the company experiences unfavorable
shifts in product mix or market share. This could also happen if a
sale of the company results in increased leverage or a delay in the
pace of improvement.

"We could revise the outlook to stable if Vertiv's growth and
operational initiatives come to fruition and it becomes apparent
that the company's adjusted–debt-to-EBITDA ratio will remain
below 7x. This may be brought about via profitable bookings in the
back half of 2018 and into 2019 from the company's solid backlog,
meaningful procurement savings, and gains from channel and digital
investments.

"While less likely, we could raise the rating on Vertiv if the
company's improvement in its credit measures is rapid enough such
that the leverage ratio approaches 5.5x and we expect it to remain
there. This more remote scenario could come about via a successful
IPO and if the proceeds, in addition to providing liquidity for
shareholders, were also used to repay substantial debt, including
the $500 million of senior unsecured PIK notes issued by the
indirect parent. An upgrade would also require strong evidence that
the sponsor will pursue a less aggressive financial policy."


WACHUSETT VENTURES: Given Until Oct. 1 to Exclusively File Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Frank J. Bailey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of West Virginia, at the behest of Wachusett
Ventures, LLC and its affiliated debtors, has extended the
Exclusive Filing Period for all Debtors, except WV-Brockton SNF,
LLC through and including October 1, 2018, and the Solicitation
Period for all Debtors except Brockton through and including
November 1, 2018.

                  About Wachusett Ventures

Founded in 2013, Wachusett Ventures, LLC, operates five skilled
nursing facilities in Connecticut and Massachusetts and employ
approximately 600 people.  For the fiscal year 2017, their gross
revenue was approximately $54 million.

Wachusett Ventures and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Mass. Lead Case No.
18-11053) on March 26, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Steven Vera, chief operating officer,
Wachusett Ventures estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million
and liabilities of less than $1 million.

Judge Frank J. Bailey presides over the case.  

The Debtors hired Nixon Peabody LLP as legal counsel; CBIZ
Accounting, Tax & Advisory of New York, LLC as financial advisor;
Marcum LLP as accountant; and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., as
claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 1 on April 6, 2018, appointed five
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 cases.


WELLNESS ANALYSIS: Proposes Heritage Auction of Medical Equipment
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Wellness Analysis, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Texas to authorize the sale of medical
equipment at auction.

Objections, if any, must be filed within 21 days from the date of
the filing of the Motion.

The Debtor current has assets that it can sell to obtain funds to
immediately pay creditors of the estate.  It has contract with
Heritage Global Partners concerning the sale of the property.
Heritage specializes in sell this type of medical equipment.  

A copy of the Auction Agreement attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

  http://bankrupt.com/misc/Wellness_Analysis_51_Sales.pdf

The Debtor believes the sale of the property will provide it with
immediate funds to pay the creditors of the estate.

The Auctioneer:

          HERITAGE GLOBAL PARTNERS, INC.
          Hacienda Del Mar
          12625 High Bluff Drive
          Suite 305
          San Diego, CA 92130
          Attn: Kirk Dove
          Telephone: (858) 847-0655
          E-mail: kdove@hginc.com

                   About Wellness Analysis

Wellness Analysis LLC operates a clinical medical laboratory in
Farmer Branch, Texas.  The laboratory conducts tests on clinical
specimens to get specific information about the health of a patient
to help in diagnosing, treating and preventing diseases.

Wellness Analysis filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No.
18-41066) on May 24, 2018.  In the petition signed by Mustopha
Oulad Chikh, sole member, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and liabilities.  Eric A. Liepins and the law
firm of Eric A. Liepins, P.C., serve as the Debtor's counsel.


WILMINGTON VICTORVILLE: Seeks Dec. 3 Plan Exclusivity Extension
---------------------------------------------------------------
Wilmington Victorville, LLC request the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of California to extend the exclusivity
periods for the Debtor (i) to file a plan of reorganization for 90
days through Dec. 3, 2018, and (ii) to obtain acceptance of a plan
of reorganization for 90 days through Jan. 29, 2019.

On Oct. 9, 2018, at 2:00 p.m., the Court will hold a hearing to
consider extending the Debtor's Exclusivity Periods.

The principal asset of the Debtor is the "Renaissance Center" -- a
commercial retail shopping center located in Victorville,
California.

Since the Petition Date, in addition to dealing with the needs and
issues arising in the Chapter 11 case and the Debtor's business,
the Debtor's financial representative has been engaged, on behalf
of the Debtor, in (a) working with lessees to obtain lease
extensions; with potential lenders regarding refinance of the Loan;
(b) working with a real estate broker regarding potential offers to
purchase the Property; and (c) discussions with other potential
investors and interested parties concerning funding to remedy the
environmental issues at the Property.

Currently, the Debtor and the Guarantors are working with an
investor who has offered to fund the cleanup of the Property and to
provide additional funds to enable the Debtor to have sufficient
time to remedy the problem and refinance the Property at an amount
sufficient to satisfy the Loan.

The Debtor is eager to resolve its problems and to reorganize and
exit this case, and has no desire to delay this case any longer
than necessary. However, the Debtor needs additional time to
confirm the arrangements for the cleanup of the Property and for
the Guarantors to document the agreement with the investor (who
would acquire their interests), so that the Debtor can then
continue its discussions with the Lender and possibly incorporate
the information and proposed transaction in what the Debtor hopes
will be a consensual plan of reorganization in its case.
Accordingly, the Debtor seeks a 90-day extension of its plan
exclusivity periods.

Meanwhile, the Debtor is administering its bankruptcy case in
compliance with the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code, the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Office of the United
States Trustee. Therefore, the Debtor submits that cause exists for
granting further extension of the exclusivity periods for the
Debtor to file a plan of reorganization and obtain acceptance
thereof.

                 About Wilmington Victorville

Wilmington Victorville, LLC, listed its business as Single Asset
Real Estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)) whose
principal assets are located at 16120 Bear Valley Road Victorville,
CA 92395.

Wilmington Victorville filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 18-15216) on May 15, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Myong Oc Kang, manager, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50
million in both assets and liabilities.

The case is assigned to the Hon. Deborah J. Saltzman.

Philip A. Gasteier, Esq., and Monica Y. Kim, Esq., at Levene,
Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP, serve as the Debtor's counsel.


WONDERWORK INC: Thompson Family Foundation Waives Plan Distribution
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen S. Gray, solely in his capacity as Chapter 11 trustee of
the estate of WonderWork, Inc., filed an amended disclosure
statement explaining the Debtor's amended Chapter 11 plan of
liquidation dated August 8, 2018.

The Amended Plan, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York, is a product of certain consensual
discussions among the Trustee, the NYSAG, pre-appointment
Professional Persons and other major claim holders in the case,
including HMS and the Thompson Family Foundation.

Under the Amended Plan, Class III is the HMS General Unsecured
Claim.  In accordance with the HMS Settlement Agreement, HMS has
agreed to waive its right to any Distribution from the Plan
Distribution Fund on account of the Allowed HMS General Unsecured
Claim, and will accept on the Effective Date in full and final
settlement of its Allowed HMS General Unsecured Claim, the HMS
Settlement Restricted Funds plus Litigation Trust Interests in
respect of the Net HMS Claim, provided, however, in no case shall
HMS receive an amount on account of its Litigation Trust Interests
in excess of the Net HMS Claim (except in respect of any separate
Litigation Trust Interest to which HMS may be entitled on account
of the HMS Substantial Contribution Claim).  Class III is Impaired;
thus, the holder of the Allowed HMS General Unsecured Claim is
entitled to vote to accept or reject the Amended Plan.

Class IV is General Unsecured Claims.  After the payment of any
Allowed Administrative Expense Claims, Allowed Professional Fees,
Allowed Secured Claims and Allowed Priority Claims, on the later to
occur of (a) the Effective Date or (b) the date such General
Unsecured Claim becomes an Allowed General Unsecured Claim, or as
soon as is practicable thereafter, each holder of an Allowed
General Unsecured Claim shall receive, in full and final
satisfaction, release and settlement of such Allowed Claim, its Pro
Rata share of Available Cash from the Plan Distribution Fund in an
amount up to, but not to exceed, its Allowed General Unsecured
Claim; provided, however, in accordance with the Thompson Family
Foundation Settlement, the Thompson Family Foundation has agreed to
waive its right to (i) receive any Distribution from the Plan
Distribution Fund on account of the Thompson Family Foundation
Claim, or (ii) acquire a Litigation Trust Interest.

In addition to receiving its Pro Rata Share of Available Cash from
the Plan Distribution Fund on the Effective Date, each holder of an
Allowed General Unsecured Claim shall be eligible to make the
Litigation Trust Election as set forth in the Litigation Trust
Agreement and described more fully in Section 9.5 of the Amended
Plan; provided, however, holders of Disputed General Unsecured
Claims shall not be eligible to make the Litigation Trust Election.
Any holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim that makes the
Litigation Trust Election shall acquire a Litigation Trust Interest
in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Amended Plan and
the Litigation Trust Agreement; provided, however, in no case shall
a holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim receive an amount on
account of its General Unsecured Claim and Litigation Trust
Interest in excess of its Allowed General Unsecured Claim.

If the Amended Plan is confirmed, and the settlements contemplated
therein are approved, the total amount of anticipated General
Unsecured Claims will be $1,949,189.  Class IV is Impaired; thus,
the holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim is entitled to
vote to accept or reject the Amended Plan.

The Amended Plan is predicated upon and incorporates the HMS
Settlement Agreement and Thompson Family Foundation Settlement, and
shall be deemed a motion for approval of the settlements pursuant
to Section 1123(b)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule
9019.

The Amended Plan is also predicated upon and incorporates the Sale
of the Acquired Assets to the Purchasers, and shall be deemed a
motion for approval of the Sale and Grant pursuant to Sections 363,
1123(a)(5), 1123(b)(4), 1129(b)(2)(A), 1141, 1145 and 1146(a) of
the Bankruptcy Code, and to the extent applicable, Sections 510 and
511 of the New York Not-For-Profit Corporation Law.  The
Confirmation Order shall also approve the Grant of a portion of the
Restricted Funds to the Charitable Recipients in accordance with
applicable law and on the terms and conditions as set forth in the
Grant Agreements.

On the Effective Date, the Trustee shall transfer the Litigation
Trust Assets to the Litigation Trust and all remaining Assets of
the Estate to the Plan Distribution Fund.  The funds utilized to
make Distributions from the Plan Distribution Fund have been or
will be generated from, among other things, Available Cash on hand,
including the proceeds of the Sale and any payment from HMS
pursuant to the terms and conditions of the HMS Settlement
Agreement, and the proceeds of the liquidation or other disposition
of the remaining Assets of the Debtor, excluding Litigation Trust
Assets.

From and after the Effective Date, except as otherwise expressly
provided herein, the Plan Administrator may, without further
approval of the Bankruptcy Court, use, sell at public or private
sale, assign, transfer, or otherwise dispose of any remaining
Assets and convert same to Cash to be Distributed in accordance
with the terms of the Amended Plan.

A copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement from PacerMonitor.com is
available at https://tinyurl.com/yd4jo2tg at no charge.

                      About Wonderwork Inc.

Wonderwork, Inc., is a charity that has provided grants to fund
more than 220,000 surgeries in just six years.  

Wonderwork filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
16-13607) on Dec. 29, 2016.  In the petition signed by CEO Brian
Mullaney, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets
and $10 million to $50 million in debt.  

The Debtor was represented by Aaron R. Cahn, Esq., at Carter
Ledyard & Milburn LLP, as counsel; and BDO USA, LLP, as auditor and
tax advisor.

Pursuant to the Court's order entered on April 21, 2017, Jason R.
Lilien was appointed as Chapter 11 examiner.  He hired Loeb & Loeb
LLP as his counsel.

On Nov. 3, 2017, the Examiner issued his final report wherein,
among other things, the Examiner found that there were sufficient
grounds to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee.

Stephen S. Gray was appointed Chapter 11 trustee in the Debtor's
case.  The Trustee tapped Togut, Segal & Segal LLP as his
bankruptcy counsel.


WOODBRIDGE GROUP: To Continue Mediation with Contrarian Funds
-------------------------------------------------------------
Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge of the U.S. District Court
for the District of Delaware recommends that the appeals case
captioned CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC, Appellant, v. WOODBRIDGE GROUP OF
COMPANIES, ET AL., Appellees, Civ. No. 18-996-LPS (D. Del.) proceed
through the appellate process of the Court, but allow the parties
to continue with mediation with the Court.

As a result of a screening process, the court was informed that
efforts are being made to resolve the matter, and the parties wish
to delay mediation with this Court. If the parties are unable to
reach a resolution, they shall so advise and may proceed with
mediation in this matter in this Court dependent on their prior
efforts. They further request that briefing on the appeal proceed
and request following briefing schedule during settlement efforts.


A copy of the Court's Recommendation is available at
https://bit.ly/2BYNkWk from Leagle.com.

Contrarian Funds, LLC, Appellant, represented by David M. Klauder ,
Bielli & Klauder, LLC.

Woodbridge Group of Companies, LLC, et al., Appellee, represented
by Sean M. Beach -- sbeach@ycst.com -- Young, Conaway, Stargatt &
Taylor LLP, Allison Mielke -- amielke@ycst.com -- Young, Conaway,
Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Edmon L. Morton  -- emorton@ycst.com
--Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP & Ian J. Bambrick –
ibambrick@ycst.com -- Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP.

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Appellee, represented by
Bradford J. Sandler -- bsandler@pszjlaw.com -- Pachulski, Stang,
Ziehl & Jones, LLP & Colin R. Robinson -- crobinson@pszjlaw.com --
Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl & Jones, LLP.

Official Ad Hoc Committee Unitholders, Appellee, represented by
Jamie Lynne Edmonson -- jledmonson@venable.com -- Venable LLP &
Daniel A. O'Brien – daobrien@venable.com -- Venable LLP.

Ad Hoc Noteholder Group, Appellee, represented by Steven K.
Kortanek -- Steven.Kortanek@dbr.com -- Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP,
Joseph N. Argentina, Jr. -- Joseph.Argentina@dbr.com -- Drinker
Biddle & Reath LLP & Patrick A. Jackson – Patrick.Jackson@dbr.com
--  Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.

                  About Woodbridge Group

Headquartered in Sherman Oaks, California, The Woodbridge Group
Enterprise -- http://www.woodbridgecompanies.com/-- is a
comprehensive real estate finance and development company.  Its
principal business is buying, improving, and selling high-end
luxury homes.  The Woodbridge Group Enterprise also owns and
operates full-service real estate brokerages, a private investment
company, and real estate lending operations.  The Woodbridge Group
Enterprise and its management team have been in the business of
providing a variety of financial products for more than 35 years,
and have been primarily focused on the luxury home business for the
past five years.  Since its inception, the Woodbridge Group
Enterprise has completed more than $1 billion in financial
transactions.  These transactions involve real estate, note buying
and selling, hard money lending, and alternative financial
transactions involving thousands of investors.

Woodbridge Group of Companies and certain of its affiliates filed
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
17-12560) on Dec. 4, 2017.  Woodbridge estimated assets and
liabilities at between $500 million and $1 billion.  The Chapter 11
cases are being jointly administered.

Judge Kevin J. Carey presides over the case.

Samuel A. Newman, Esq., Oscar Garza, Esq., Daniel B. Denny, Esq.,
Jennifer L. Conn, Esq., Eric J. Wise, Esq., Matthew K. Kelsey,
Esq., and Matthew P. Porcelli, Esq., at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher,
LLP, and Sean M. Beach, Esq., Edmon L. Morton, Esq., Ian J.
Bambrick, Esq., and Allison S. Mielke, Esq., at Young Conaway
Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.
Homer Bonner Jacobs, PA, as special counsel, Province, Inc., as
expert consultant, Moelis & Company LLC, as investment banker.

The Debtors' financial advisors are Larry Perkins, John Farrace,
Robert Shenfeld, Reece Fulgham, Miles Staglik, and Lissa Weissman
at SierraConstellation Partners, LLC.  Beilinson Advisory Group is
serving as independent management to the Debtors.  Garden City
Group, LLC, is the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones is counsel to the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors; and FTI Consulting, Inc., serves as its
financial advisor.

An official committee of unsecured creditors was appointed in the
Chapter 11 cases on Dec. 14, 2017.  On Jan. 23, 2018, the Court
approved a settlement providing for the formation of an ad hoc
noteholder group and an ad hoc unitholder group.


XPEERANT INCORPORATED: Case Summary & 17 Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Xpeerant Incorporated
        4308 North Garfield
        Loveland, CO 80538

Business Description: Headquartered in Fort Collins, Colorado,
                      Xpeerant Incorporated is a recruitment
                      agency that supplies employees to companies
                      within the semi-conductor and technical
                      industry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 31, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Colorado (Denver)

Case No.: 18-17700

Judge: Hon. Joseph G. Rosania Jr.

Debtor's Counsel: Lee M. Kutner, Esq.
                  KUTNER BRINEN, P.C.
                  1660 Lincoln St., Ste. 1850
                  Denver, CO 80264
                  Tel: 303-832-2400
                  Email: lmk@kutnerlaw.com

Total Assets: $48,215

Total Liabilities: $1,469,565

The petition was signed by Gary Petty, authorized representative.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 17 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob18-17700.pdf


[^] Large Companies with Insolvent Balance Sheet
------------------------------------------------

                                                Total
                                               Share-      Total
                                    Total    Holders'    Working
                                   Assets      Equity    Capital
  Company         Ticker             ($MM)       ($MM)      ($MM)
  -------         ------           ------    --------    -------
ABBVIE INC        ABBV US        61,641.0    (3,375.0)  (3,379.0)
ABBVIE INC        4AB TH         61,641.0    (3,375.0)  (3,379.0)
ABBVIE INC        ABBVEUR EU     61,641.0    (3,375.0)  (3,379.0)
ABBVIE INC        4AB QT         61,641.0    (3,375.0)  (3,379.0)
ABBVIE INC        4AB GR         61,641.0    (3,375.0)  (3,379.0)
ABBVIE INC        ABBV* MM       61,641.0    (3,375.0)  (3,379.0)
ABBVIE INC        ABBVUSD EU     61,641.0    (3,375.0)  (3,379.0)
ABBVIE INC        ABBV AV        61,641.0    (3,375.0)  (3,379.0)
ABBVIE INC        4AB GZ         61,641.0    (3,375.0)  (3,379.0)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ABT CN             97.0       (56.5)     (35.2)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  OU1 GR             97.0       (56.5)     (35.2)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ALSWF US           97.0       (56.5)     (35.2)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ABT2EUR EU         97.0       (56.5)     (35.2)
ACELRX PHARMA     ACRX US            64.6       (49.0)      39.7
ACELRX PHARMA     ACRXUSD EU         64.6       (49.0)      39.7
AIMIA INC         AIM CN          3,521.5      (190.9)  (1,254.4)
AIMIA INC         GAPFF US        3,521.5      (190.9)  (1,254.4)
AMER RESTAUR-LP   ICTPU US           33.5        (4.0)      (6.2)
AMERICA'S CAR-MA  CRMT US           455.6      (211.7)     354.4
AMERICA'S CAR-MA  HC9 GR            455.6      (211.7)     354.4
AMERICA'S CAR-MA  CRMTEUR EU        455.6      (211.7)     354.4
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL11EUR EU    52,622.0      (869.0)  (7,493.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL AV         52,622.0      (869.0)  (7,493.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL TE         52,622.0      (869.0)  (7,493.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G SW         52,622.0      (869.0)  (7,493.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL1CHF EU     52,622.0      (869.0)  (7,493.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G QT         52,622.0      (869.0)  (7,493.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL US         52,622.0      (869.0)  (7,493.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G GR         52,622.0      (869.0)  (7,493.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL* MM        52,622.0      (869.0)  (7,493.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL1USD EU     52,622.0      (869.0)  (7,493.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G TH         52,622.0      (869.0)  (7,493.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G GZ         52,622.0      (869.0)  (7,493.0)
AMYRIS INC        3A01 GR           118.7      (249.0)     (91.8)
AMYRIS INC        3A01 TH           118.7      (249.0)     (91.8)
AMYRIS INC        AMRS US           118.7      (249.0)     (91.8)
AMYRIS INC        AMRSUSD EU        118.7      (249.0)     (91.8)
AMYRIS INC        AMRSEUR EU        118.7      (249.0)     (91.8)
AMYRIS INC        3A01 QT           118.7      (249.0)     (91.8)
AQUESTIVE THERAP  AQST US            46.1       (22.4)      14.3
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AST GR            264.9      (284.1)    (371.1)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AZPNUSD EU        264.9      (284.1)    (371.1)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AZPN US           264.9      (284.1)    (371.1)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AST TH            264.9      (284.1)    (371.1)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AZPNEUR EU        264.9      (284.1)    (371.1)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AST QT            264.9      (284.1)    (371.1)
ATLATSA RESOURCE  ATL SJ            170.1      (210.5)       6.1
AUTODESK INC      ADSK US         3,833.0      (241.6)    (316.3)
AUTODESK INC      AUD TH          3,833.0      (241.6)    (316.3)
AUTODESK INC      AUD GR          3,833.0      (241.6)    (316.3)
AUTODESK INC      ADSK AV         3,833.0      (241.6)    (316.3)
AUTODESK INC      ADSKEUR EU      3,833.0      (241.6)    (316.3)
AUTODESK INC      ADSKUSD EU      3,833.0      (241.6)    (316.3)
AUTODESK INC      ADSK* MM        3,833.0      (241.6)    (316.3)
AUTODESK INC      AUD QT          3,833.0      (241.6)    (316.3)
AUTODESK INC      ADSK TE         3,833.0      (241.6)    (316.3)
AUTODESK INC      AUD GZ          3,833.0      (241.6)    (316.3)
AUTOZONE INC      AZO US          9,301.8    (1,361.6)    (247.1)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 GR          9,301.8    (1,361.6)    (247.1)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 TH          9,301.8    (1,361.6)    (247.1)
AUTOZONE INC      AZOUSD EU       9,301.8    (1,361.6)    (247.1)
AUTOZONE INC      AZOEUR EU       9,301.8    (1,361.6)    (247.1)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 QT          9,301.8    (1,361.6)    (247.1)
AVALARA INC       AVLR US           352.7       142.2       66.3
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVID US           254.0      (176.9)       3.8
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVD GR            254.0      (176.9)       3.8
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BNFTEUR EU        181.3       (27.5)      (2.3)
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BTF GR            181.3       (27.5)      (2.3)
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BNFT US           181.3       (27.5)      (2.3)
BJ'S WHOLESALE C  BJ US           3,220.9      (317.9)     (11.9)
BJ'S WHOLESALE C  8BJ GR          3,220.9      (317.9)     (11.9)
BJ'S WHOLESALE C  8BJ QT          3,220.9      (317.9)     (11.9)
BLOOM ENERGY C-A  BE US           1,157.7      (564.8)     142.1
BLOOM ENERGY C-A  1ZB GR          1,157.7      (564.8)     142.1
BLOOM ENERGY C-A  1ZB QT          1,157.7      (564.8)     142.1
BLUE BIRD CORP    BLBD US           331.5       (44.5)      10.8
BLUE RIDGE MOUNT  BRMR US         1,060.2      (212.5)     (62.4)
BOEING CO-BDR     BOEI34 BZ     113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO-CED     BA AR         113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BOE LN        113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BCO TH        113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BACHF EU      113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BOEI BB       113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA US         113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA SW         113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA* MM        113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA TE         113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BCO GR        113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BAEUR EU      113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA EU         113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA AV         113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BCO QT        113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA CI         113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BAUSD SW      113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOEING CO/THE     BCO GZ        113,195.0    (1,374.0)   8,676.0
BOMBARDIER INC-A  BDRAF US       25,029.0    (3,829.0)   1,419.0
BOMBARDIER INC-A  BBD/A CN       25,029.0    (3,829.0)   1,419.0
BOMBARDIER INC-B  BDRBF US       25,029.0    (3,829.0)   1,419.0
BOMBARDIER INC-B  BBD/B CN       25,029.0    (3,829.0)   1,419.0
BRINKER INTL      BKJ GR          1,347.3      (718.3)    (278.1)
BRINKER INTL      EAT US          1,347.3      (718.3)    (278.1)
BRINKER INTL      BKJ QT          1,347.3      (718.3)    (278.1)
BRINKER INTL      EAT2EUR EU      1,347.3      (718.3)    (278.1)
BROOKFIELD REAL   BRE CN            101.1       (41.7)       5.6
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  DOO CN          2,671.7      (445.7)       -
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  B15A GR         2,671.7      (445.7)       -
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  BRPIF US        2,671.7      (445.7)       -
BUFFALO COAL COR  BUC SJ             31.9       (34.4)     (49.1)
CACTUS INC- A     WHD US            406.1       265.3      141.5
CACTUS INC- A     43C GR            406.1       265.3      141.5
CACTUS INC- A     43C QT            406.1       265.3      141.5
CACTUS INC- A     WHDEUR EU         406.1       265.3      141.5
CACTUS INC- A     43C TH            406.1       265.3      141.5
CACTUS INC- A     WHDUSD EU         406.1       265.3      141.5
CACTUS INC- A     43C GZ            406.1       265.3      141.5
CADIZ INC         CDZI US            74.7       (73.9)      17.7
CADIZ INC         2ZC GR             74.7       (73.9)      17.7
CAMBIUM LEARNING  ABCD US           150.3        (6.5)     (63.3)
CARDLYTICS INC    CDLX US           140.2        36.8       64.9
CARDLYTICS INC    CYX TH            140.2        36.8       64.9
CARDLYTICS INC    CDLXEUR EU        140.2        36.8       64.9
CARDLYTICS INC    CYX QT            140.2        36.8       64.9
CARDLYTICS INC    CYX GR            140.2        36.8       64.9
CARDLYTICS INC    CYX GZ            140.2        36.8       64.9
CASELLA WASTE     CWST US           652.6       (34.7)       1.1
CASELLA WASTE     WA3 GR            652.6       (34.7)       1.1
CASELLA WASTE     WA3 TH            652.6       (34.7)       1.1
CASELLA WASTE     CWSTEUR EU        652.6       (34.7)       1.1
CASELLA WASTE     CWSTUSD EU        652.6       (34.7)       1.1
CDK GLOBAL INC    C2G QT          3,008.4      (347.3)     818.9
CDK GLOBAL INC    CDKUSD EU       3,008.4      (347.3)     818.9
CDK GLOBAL INC    C2G TH          3,008.4      (347.3)     818.9
CDK GLOBAL INC    CDKEUR EU       3,008.4      (347.3)     818.9
CDK GLOBAL INC    C2G GR          3,008.4      (347.3)     818.9
CDK GLOBAL INC    CDK US          3,008.4      (347.3)     818.9
CEDAR FAIR LP     FUN US          2,079.2       (70.1)    (127.4)
CEDAR FAIR LP     7CF GR          2,079.2       (70.1)    (127.4)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CS1 TH         12,341.0      (117.0)  (1,633.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CHK* MM        12,341.0      (117.0)  (1,633.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CHKUSD EU      12,341.0      (117.0)  (1,633.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CS1 QT         12,341.0      (117.0)  (1,633.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CHK US         12,341.0      (117.0)  (1,633.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CS1 GR         12,341.0      (117.0)  (1,633.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CHKEUR EU      12,341.0      (117.0)  (1,633.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CS1 GZ         12,341.0      (117.0)  (1,633.0)
CHOICE HOTELS     CZH GR          1,123.0      (204.0)      (3.5)
CHOICE HOTELS     CHH US          1,123.0      (204.0)      (3.5)
CINCINNATI BELL   CBB US          2,166.1      (143.4)     331.1
CINCINNATI BELL   CIB1 GR         2,166.1      (143.4)     331.1
CINCINNATI BELL   CBBEUR EU       2,166.1      (143.4)     331.1
CLEAR CHANNEL-A   CCO US          4,521.1    (2,079.0)     305.4
CLEAR CHANNEL-A   C7C GR          4,521.1    (2,079.0)     305.4
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CLF* MM         3,051.5      (306.3)   1,072.0
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CLF US          3,051.5      (306.3)   1,072.0
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CVA TH          3,051.5      (306.3)   1,072.0
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CLF2 EU         3,051.5      (306.3)   1,072.0
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CLF2EUR EU      3,051.5      (306.3)   1,072.0
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CVA QT          3,051.5      (306.3)   1,072.0
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CVA GR          3,051.5      (306.3)   1,072.0
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CVA GZ          3,051.5      (306.3)   1,072.0
COGENT COMMUNICA  OGM1 GR           700.2      (114.6)     221.8
COGENT COMMUNICA  CCOI US           700.2      (114.6)     221.8
COLGATE-BDR       COLG34 BZ      12,650.0      (189.0)     230.0
COLGATE-PALMOLIV  CL EU          12,650.0      (189.0)     230.0
COLGATE-PALMOLIV  CPA TH         12,650.0      (189.0)     230.0
COLGATE-PALMOLIV  CLCHF EU       12,650.0      (189.0)     230.0
COLGATE-PALMOLIV  CLEUR EU       12,650.0      (189.0)     230.0
COLGATE-PALMOLIV  CL* MM         12,650.0      (189.0)     230.0
COLGATE-PALMOLIV  CL SW          12,650.0      (189.0)     230.0
COLGATE-PALMOLIV  CPA QT         12,650.0      (189.0)     230.0
COLGATE-PALMOLIV  CPA GR         12,650.0      (189.0)     230.0
COLGATE-PALMOLIV  CL US          12,650.0      (189.0)     230.0
COLGATE-PALMOLIV  CL TE          12,650.0      (189.0)     230.0
COLGATE-PALMOLIV  COLG AV        12,650.0      (189.0)     230.0
COLGATE-PALMOLIV  CLUSD SW       12,650.0      (189.0)     230.0
COLGATE-PALMOLIV  CPA GZ         12,650.0      (189.0)     230.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CYH US         16,794.0      (289.0)   1,632.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CG5 GR         16,794.0      (289.0)   1,632.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CYH1USD EU     16,794.0      (289.0)   1,632.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CG5 TH         16,794.0      (289.0)   1,632.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CG5 QT         16,794.0      (289.0)   1,632.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CYH1EUR EU     16,794.0      (289.0)   1,632.0
COMSTOCK RES INC  CRK US            921.3      (442.4)      13.1
COMSTOCK RES INC  CX9 GR            921.3      (442.4)      13.1
COMSTOCK RES INC  CRK1EUR EU        921.3      (442.4)      13.1
CONSUMER CAPITAL  CCGN US            11.4        (4.6)      (2.6)
CONVERGEONE HOLD  CVON US         1,018.8      (128.2)      44.7
CUMULUS MEDIA-A   CMLS US         2,413.5      (498.0)     342.7
DELEK LOGISTICS   DKL US            650.3      (129.0)      29.0
DELEK LOGISTICS   D6L GR            650.3      (129.0)      29.0
DENNY'S CORP      DENN US           334.6      (117.9)     (44.5)
DENNY'S CORP      DE8 GR            334.6      (117.9)     (44.5)
DENNY'S CORP      DENNEUR EU        334.6      (117.9)     (44.5)
DINE BRANDS GLOB  DIN US          1,650.3      (223.3)      65.6
DINE BRANDS GLOB  IHP GR          1,650.3      (223.3)      65.6
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 GR          2,052.7      (146.6)      29.8
DOLLARAMA INC     DLMAF US        2,052.7      (146.6)      29.8
DOLLARAMA INC     DOL CN          2,052.7      (146.6)      29.8
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 GZ          2,052.7      (146.6)      29.8
DOLLARAMA INC     DOLEUR EU       2,052.7      (146.6)      29.8
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 TH          2,052.7      (146.6)      29.8
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 QT          2,052.7      (146.6)      29.8
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV GR            954.6    (2,929.2)     305.5
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZ US            954.6    (2,929.2)     305.5
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZEUR EU         954.6    (2,929.2)     305.5
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZUSD EU         954.6    (2,929.2)     305.5
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV TH            954.6    (2,929.2)     305.5
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV QT            954.6    (2,929.2)     305.5
DUN & BRADSTREET  DNB US          1,961.9      (758.1)    (330.1)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DB5 GR          1,961.9      (758.1)    (330.1)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DNB1USD EU      1,961.9      (758.1)    (330.1)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DB5 QT          1,961.9      (758.1)    (330.1)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DNB1EUR EU      1,961.9      (758.1)    (330.1)
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB GR          3,298.7      (817.8)     226.5
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB TH          3,298.7      (817.8)     226.5
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  DNKN US         3,298.7      (817.8)     226.5
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  DNKNUSD EU      3,298.7      (817.8)     226.5
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB QT          3,298.7      (817.8)     226.5
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  DNKNEUR EU      3,298.7      (817.8)     226.5
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB GZ          3,298.7      (817.8)     226.5
EGAIN CORP        EGCA GR            37.6        (9.2)     (10.9)
EGAIN CORP        EGAN US            37.6        (9.2)     (10.9)
EGAIN CORP        EGANEUR EU         37.6        (9.2)     (10.9)
ENPHASE ENERGY    E0P GR            218.5       (30.1)      40.7
ENPHASE ENERGY    ENPH US           218.5       (30.1)      40.7
ENPHASE ENERGY    ENPHUSD EU        218.5       (30.1)      40.7
ENPHASE ENERGY    E0P QT            218.5       (30.1)      40.7
ENPHASE ENERGY    E0P TH            218.5       (30.1)      40.7
ENPHASE ENERGY    ENPHEUR EU        218.5       (30.1)      40.7
ENPHASE ENERGY    E0P GZ            218.5       (30.1)      40.7
EVERI HOLDINGS I  EVRI US         1,439.8      (120.3)      (3.8)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  G2C TH          1,439.8      (120.3)      (3.8)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  G2C GR          1,439.8      (120.3)      (3.8)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  EVRIUSD EU      1,439.8      (120.3)      (3.8)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  EVRIEUR EU      1,439.8      (120.3)      (3.8)
EXELA TECHNOLOGI  XELAU US        1,728.9       (62.1)     (40.6)
EXELA TECHNOLOGI  XELA US         1,728.9       (62.1)     (40.6)
FERRELLGAS-LP     FGP US          1,532.6      (812.6)      26.0
FUSION CONNECT I  GVB GR            638.9      (118.9)     (84.3)
FUSION CONNECT I  FSNN US           638.9      (118.9)     (84.3)
GAMCO INVESTO-A   GBL US            140.2       (44.9)       -
GNC HOLDINGS INC  GNC US          1,499.1      (166.1)     250.2
GNC HOLDINGS INC  GNC1USD EU      1,499.1      (166.1)     250.2
GNC HOLDINGS INC  GNC* MM         1,499.1      (166.1)     250.2
GOGO INC          GOGO US         1,304.3      (228.2)     310.1
GOGO INC          GOGOEUR EU      1,304.3      (228.2)     310.1
GOGO INC          G0G QT          1,304.3      (228.2)     310.1
GOGO INC          G0G GR          1,304.3      (228.2)     310.1
GOOSEHEAD INSU-A  GSHD US            32.0       (26.7)       -
GOOSEHEAD INSU-A  2OX GR             32.0       (26.7)       -
GOOSEHEAD INSU-A  GSHDEUR EU         32.0       (26.7)       -
GRAFTECH INTERNA  EAF US          1,566.9      (991.0)     422.9
GRAFTECH INTERNA  G6G GR          1,566.9      (991.0)     422.9
GRAFTECH INTERNA  EAFEUR EU       1,566.9      (991.0)     422.9
GRAFTECH INTERNA  G6G TH          1,566.9      (991.0)     422.9
GRAFTECH INTERNA  G6G QT          1,566.9      (991.0)     422.9
GRAFTECH INTERNA  EAFUSD EU       1,566.9      (991.0)     422.9
GREEN PLAINS PAR  GPP US             92.2       (66.4)       4.0
GREEN PLAINS PAR  8GP GR             92.2       (66.4)       4.0
GREEN THUMB INDU  R9U2 GR             1.1        (0.5)      (0.5)
GREEN THUMB INDU  GTII CN             1.1        (0.5)      (0.5)
GREEN THUMB INDU  GTBIF US            1.1        (0.5)      (0.5)
GREENSKY INC-A    GSKY US           758.7       (46.5)     (65.5)
HANGER INC        HNGR US           664.4       (35.3)     126.1
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH TH         37,742.0    (4,125.0)   2,769.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCA US         37,742.0    (4,125.0)   2,769.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH GR         37,742.0    (4,125.0)   2,769.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCA* MM        37,742.0    (4,125.0)   2,769.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCAUSD EU      37,742.0    (4,125.0)   2,769.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCAEUR EU      37,742.0    (4,125.0)   2,769.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH QT         37,742.0    (4,125.0)   2,769.0
HELIUS MEDICAL T  26H GR             17.1       (12.1)     (12.4)
HELIUS MEDICAL T  HSM CN             17.1       (12.1)     (12.4)
HELIUS MEDICAL T  HSDT US            17.1       (12.1)     (12.4)
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HLF US          2,421.5      (779.4)    (133.9)
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HOO GR          2,421.5      (779.4)    (133.9)
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HLFUSD EU       2,421.5      (779.4)    (133.9)
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HLFEUR EU       2,421.5      (779.4)    (133.9)
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HOO QT          2,421.5      (779.4)    (133.9)
HORTONWORKS INC   14K QT            291.4        (3.6)      (5.2)
HORTONWORKS INC   HDPEUR EU         291.4        (3.6)      (5.2)
HORTONWORKS INC   HDP US            291.4        (3.6)      (5.2)
HORTONWORKS INC   14K GR            291.4        (3.6)      (5.2)
HP COMPANY-BDR    HPQB34 BZ      34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
HP INC            HPQ TE         34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
HP INC            7HP GR         34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
HP INC            HPQ US         34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
HP INC            7HP TH         34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
HP INC            HWP QT         34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
HP INC            HPQCHF EU      34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
HP INC            HPQUSD EU      34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
HP INC            HPQ CI         34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
HP INC            HPQ SW         34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
HP INC            HPQ* MM        34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
HP INC            7HP SW         34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
HP INC            HPQUSD SW      34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
HP INC            HPQEUR EU      34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
HP INC            7HP GZ         34,254.0    (1,767.0)  (3,730.0)
IDEXX LABS        IDXX AV         1,520.7       (40.8)     (34.5)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 GZ          1,520.7       (40.8)     (34.5)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 TH          1,520.7       (40.8)     (34.5)
IDEXX LABS        IDXX US         1,520.7       (40.8)     (34.5)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 GR          1,520.7       (40.8)     (34.5)
IDEXX LABS        IDXX TE         1,520.7       (40.8)     (34.5)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 QT          1,520.7       (40.8)     (34.5)
INFRASTRUCTURE A  IEA US            180.2      (118.2)     (20.7)
INNOVIVA INC      HVE GR            338.7      (155.4)     171.9
INNOVIVA INC      INVAUSD EU        338.7      (155.4)     171.9
INNOVIVA INC      INVA US           338.7      (155.4)     171.9
INNOVIVA INC      HVE QT            338.7      (155.4)     171.9
INNOVIVA INC      HVE TH            338.7      (155.4)     171.9
INNOVIVA INC      INVAEUR EU        338.7      (155.4)     171.9
INNOVIVA INC      HVE GZ            338.7      (155.4)     171.9
INSEEGO CORP      INSG US           142.5       (64.6)      (5.8)
INSPIRED ENTERTA  INSE US           206.6        (5.0)      (7.7)
INTERNAP CORP     IP9N GR           724.7        (5.0)     (33.2)
INTERNAP CORP     INAP US           724.7        (5.0)     (33.2)
INTERNAP CORP     INAPEUR EU        724.7        (5.0)     (33.2)
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  IRWD US           618.2       (44.0)     184.6
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  I76 GR            618.2       (44.0)     184.6
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  I76 QT            618.2       (44.0)     184.6
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  IRWDEUR EU        618.2       (44.0)     184.6
ISRAMCO INC       IRM GR            110.2       (14.8)      (7.3)
ISRAMCO INC       ISRL US           110.2       (14.8)      (7.3)
ISRAMCO INC       ISRLEUR EU        110.2       (14.8)      (7.3)
JACK IN THE BOX   JACK US           879.4      (490.5)     (30.9)
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX GR            879.4      (490.5)     (30.9)
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX QT            879.4      (490.5)     (30.9)
JACK IN THE BOX   JACK1EUR EU       879.4      (490.5)     (30.9)
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX GZ            879.4      (490.5)     (30.9)
JAMBA INC         JMBA US            36.7       (10.3)     (11.9)
JAMBA INC         XJA1 GR            36.7       (10.3)     (11.9)
KERYX BIOPHARM    KERXUSD EU        145.7       (41.2)      70.6
KERYX BIOPHARM    KERX US           145.7       (41.2)      70.6
L BRANDS INC      LTD GR          7,619.6    (1,122.2)     858.6
L BRANDS INC      LB US           7,619.6    (1,122.2)     858.6
L BRANDS INC      LTD TH          7,619.6    (1,122.2)     858.6
L BRANDS INC      LBUSD EU        7,619.6    (1,122.2)     858.6
L BRANDS INC      LTD QT          7,619.6    (1,122.2)     858.6
L BRANDS INC      LBEUR EU        7,619.6    (1,122.2)     858.6
L BRANDS INC      LB* MM          7,619.6    (1,122.2)     858.6
L BRANDS INC      LTD SW          7,619.6    (1,122.2)     858.6
LAMB WESTON       0L5 QT          2,752.6      (279.2)     411.7
LAMB WESTON       LW-WUSD EU      2,752.6      (279.2)     411.7
LAMB WESTON       LW US           2,752.6      (279.2)     411.7
LAMB WESTON       0L5 GR          2,752.6      (279.2)     411.7
LAMB WESTON       LW-WEUR EU      2,752.6      (279.2)     411.7
LAMB WESTON       0L5 TH          2,752.6      (279.2)     411.7
LEGACY RESERVES   LGCY US         1,510.6      (251.0)    (589.8)
LEGACY RESERVES   LRT GR          1,510.6      (251.0)    (589.8)
LEGACY RESERVES   LRT QT          1,510.6      (251.0)    (589.8)
LEGACY RESERVES   LRT GZ          1,510.6      (251.0)    (589.8)
LENNOX INTL INC   LXI GR          2,099.4      (180.2)     641.7
LENNOX INTL INC   LII US          2,099.4      (180.2)     641.7
LENNOX INTL INC   LXI TH          2,099.4      (180.2)     641.7
LENNOX INTL INC   LII1USD EU      2,099.4      (180.2)     641.7
LENNOX INTL INC   LII1EUR EU      2,099.4      (180.2)     641.7
LEXICON PHARMACE  LX31 GR           332.9        (4.9)     138.9
LEXICON PHARMACE  LXRX US           332.9        (4.9)     138.9
LEXICON PHARMACE  LXRXUSD EU        332.9        (4.9)     138.9
LEXICON PHARMACE  LXRXEUR EU        332.9        (4.9)     138.9
LEXICON PHARMACE  LX31 QT           332.9        (4.9)     138.9
LIQUIDIA TECHNOL  LQDA US            20.8       (12.9)      (5.0)
LIQUIDIA TECHNOL  LT4 TH             20.8       (12.9)      (5.0)
MCDONALDS - BDR   MCDC34 BZ      32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO TH         32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD SW         32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD US         32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO GR         32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD* MM        32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD TE         32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD AV         32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO QT         32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDCHF EU      32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDUSD EU      32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD CI         32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDUSD SW      32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDEUR EU      32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO GZ         32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MCDONALDS-CEDEAR  MCD AR         32,708.4    (5,851.0)   1,385.3
MDC PARTNERS-A    MD7A GR         1,788.6       (97.6)    (177.0)
MDC PARTNERS-A    MDCA US         1,788.6       (97.6)    (177.0)
MDC PARTNERS-A    MDCAEUR EU      1,788.6       (97.6)    (177.0)
MEDLEY MANAGE-A   MDLY US            94.2       (54.1)      13.7
MICHAELS COS INC  MIK US          2,192.5    (1,699.4)     501.7
MICHAELS COS INC  MIM GR          2,192.5    (1,699.4)     501.7
MONEYGRAM INTERN  9M1N GR         4,526.8      (236.6)     (52.3)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  MGI US          4,526.8      (236.6)     (52.3)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  9M1N TH         4,526.8      (236.6)     (52.3)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  MGIEUR EU       4,526.8      (236.6)     (52.3)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  MGIUSD EU       4,526.8      (236.6)     (52.3)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  9M1N QT         4,526.8      (236.6)     (52.3)
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MOT TE          8,881.0    (1,492.0)     659.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI US          8,881.0    (1,492.0)     659.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA TH         8,881.0    (1,492.0)     659.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA GR         8,881.0    (1,492.0)     659.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA QT         8,881.0    (1,492.0)     659.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI1EUR EU      8,881.0    (1,492.0)     659.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA GZ         8,881.0    (1,492.0)     659.0
MSG NETWORKS- A   MSGN US           849.6      (657.7)     227.2
MSG NETWORKS- A   1M4 TH            849.6      (657.7)     227.2
MSG NETWORKS- A   1M4 GR            849.6      (657.7)     227.2
MSG NETWORKS- A   1M4 QT            849.6      (657.7)     227.2
MSG NETWORKS- A   MSGNEUR EU        849.6      (657.7)     227.2
NATERA INC        NTRA US           194.4       (22.0)      67.2
NATERA INC        45E GR            194.4       (22.0)      67.2
NATHANS FAMOUS    NATH US            79.4       (82.9)      58.3
NATHANS FAMOUS    NFA GR             79.4       (82.9)      58.3
NATIONAL CINEMED  NCMI US         1,132.7       (95.1)     100.6
NATIONAL CINEMED  XWM GR          1,132.7       (95.1)     100.6
NATIONAL CINEMED  NCMIEUR EU      1,132.7       (95.1)     100.6
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR TH          6,487.0    (4,527.0)     456.0
NAVISTAR INTL     NAVEUR EU       6,487.0    (4,527.0)     456.0
NAVISTAR INTL     NAVUSD EU       6,487.0    (4,527.0)     456.0
NAVISTAR INTL     NAV US          6,487.0    (4,527.0)     456.0
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR GR          6,487.0    (4,527.0)     456.0
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR QT          6,487.0    (4,527.0)     456.0
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR GZ          6,487.0    (4,527.0)     456.0
NEOS THERAPEUTIC  NEOS US            84.0       (18.6)       3.9
NEURONETICS INC   STIM US            28.3       (18.1)      11.2
NEW ENG RLTY-LP   NEN US            253.8       (35.6)       -
NII HOLDINGS INC  NIHDEUR EU        966.0      (159.4)     132.4
NII HOLDINGS INC  NIHD US           966.0      (159.4)     132.4
NII HOLDINGS INC  NJJA GR           966.0      (159.4)     132.4
NORTHERN OIL AND  NOG US            883.1      (147.8)     118.0
NORTHERN OIL AND  NOG1USD EU        883.1      (147.8)     118.0
OMEROS CORP       OMER US           106.3       (56.3)      72.1
OMEROS CORP       3O8 GR            106.3       (56.3)      72.1
OMEROS CORP       OMERUSD EU        106.3       (56.3)      72.1
OMEROS CORP       OMEREUR EU        106.3       (56.3)      72.1
OMEROS CORP       3O8 TH            106.3       (56.3)      72.1
OPTIVA INC        RE6 GR            158.9       (16.7)      21.9
OPTIVA INC        OPT CN            158.9       (16.7)      21.9
OPTIVA INC        RKNEF US          158.9       (16.7)      21.9
OPTIVA INC        RKNEUR EU         158.9       (16.7)      21.9
OPTIVA INC        3230510Q EU       158.9       (16.7)      21.9
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PP1 GR            558.2      (243.0)      11.9
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PZZA US           558.2      (243.0)      11.9
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PZZAEUR EU        558.2      (243.0)      11.9
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1 EU         40,721.0   (10,168.0)   2,587.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 GR         40,721.0   (10,168.0)   2,587.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM US          40,721.0   (10,168.0)   2,587.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1CHF EU      40,721.0   (10,168.0)   2,587.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1 TE         40,721.0   (10,168.0)   2,587.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 TH         40,721.0   (10,168.0)   2,587.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1EUR EU      40,721.0   (10,168.0)   2,587.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI SW         40,721.0   (10,168.0)   2,587.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 QT         40,721.0   (10,168.0)   2,587.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMOR AV        40,721.0   (10,168.0)   2,587.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 GZ         40,721.0   (10,168.0)   2,587.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI1 IX        40,721.0   (10,168.0)   2,587.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI EB         40,721.0   (10,168.0)   2,587.0
PINNACLE ENTERTA  PNK US          3,859.0      (281.5)     (33.6)
PINNACLE ENTERTA  65P GR          3,859.0      (281.5)     (33.6)
PIVOTAL SYST-CDI  PVS AU              -           -          -
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT1USD EU     1,124.7       (91.2)     104.2
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT US         1,124.7       (91.2)     104.2
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL TH          1,124.7       (91.2)     104.2
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL GR          1,124.7       (91.2)     104.2
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT1EUR EU     1,124.7       (91.2)     104.2
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL QT          1,124.7       (91.2)     104.2
PLURALSIGHT IN-A  PS US             416.2       239.9       97.3
PROS HOLDINGS IN  PRO US            281.4       (68.7)      74.6
PROS HOLDINGS IN  PH2 GR            281.4       (68.7)      74.6
PROS HOLDINGS IN  PRO1EUR EU        281.4       (68.7)      74.6
QUEBECOR INC-A    QBR/A CN        9,142.5      (339.1)  (1,076.3)
QUEBECOR INC-B    QB3 GR          9,142.5      (339.1)  (1,076.3)
QUEBECOR INC-B    QBCRF US        9,142.5      (339.1)  (1,076.3)
QUEBECOR INC-B    QBR/B CN        9,142.5      (339.1)  (1,076.3)
REATA PHARMACE-A  RETA US           174.7      (167.9)     116.7
REATA PHARMACE-A  2R3 GR            174.7      (167.9)     116.7
REATA PHARMACE-A  RETAEUR EU        174.7      (167.9)     116.7
RESOLUTE ENERGY   REN US            826.6       (82.8)    (152.0)
RESOLUTE ENERGY   R21 GR            826.6       (82.8)    (152.0)
RESOLUTE ENERGY   RENEUR EU         826.6       (82.8)    (152.0)
RESVERLOGIX CORP  RVX CN              8.6       (78.5)     (34.5)
REVLON INC-A      RVL1 GR         3,091.9      (980.7)       6.7
REVLON INC-A      RVL1 TH         3,091.9      (980.7)       6.7
REVLON INC-A      REVEUR EU       3,091.9      (980.7)       6.7
REVLON INC-A      REV US          3,091.9      (980.7)       6.7
REVLON INC-A      REVUSD EU       3,091.9      (980.7)       6.7
RIMINI STREET IN  RMNI US           119.5      (229.9)    (131.1)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RS8 GR            169.2        (4.2)     (63.3)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RS8 TH            169.2        (4.2)     (63.3)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RST US            169.2        (4.2)     (63.3)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RST1EUR EU        169.2        (4.2)     (63.3)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RST1USD EU        169.2        (4.2)     (63.3)
RR DONNELLEY & S  DLLN TH         3,653.8      (247.5)     673.5
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRDUSD EU       3,653.8      (247.5)     673.5
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRD US          3,653.8      (247.5)     673.5
RR DONNELLEY & S  DLLN GR         3,653.8      (247.5)     673.5
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRDEUR EU       3,653.8      (247.5)     673.5
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  S7V GR          2,095.7      (326.2)     615.4
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  SBH US          2,095.7      (326.2)     615.4
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  SBHEUR EU       2,095.7      (326.2)     615.4
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  SN* MM          2,904.4       (67.7)      58.6
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  SNUSD EU        2,904.4       (67.7)      58.6
SBA COMM CORP     SBACUSD EU      7,289.4    (3,042.1)      49.1
SBA COMM CORP     SBACEUR EU      7,289.4    (3,042.1)      49.1
SBA COMM CORP     SBJ TH          7,289.4    (3,042.1)      49.1
SBA COMM CORP     4SB GR          7,289.4    (3,042.1)      49.1
SBA COMM CORP     SBAC US         7,289.4    (3,042.1)      49.1
SBA COMM CORP     4SB GZ          7,289.4    (3,042.1)      49.1
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  SGMS US         7,612.9    (2,268.4)     630.9
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  SGMSUSD EU      7,612.9    (2,268.4)     630.9
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  TJW GR          7,612.9    (2,268.4)     630.9
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  TJW TH          7,612.9    (2,268.4)     630.9
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  TJW GZ          7,612.9    (2,268.4)     630.9
SEALED AIR CORP   SDA GR          4,859.2      (372.4)     156.9
SEALED AIR CORP   SEE US          4,859.2      (372.4)     156.9
SEALED AIR CORP   SEE1EUR EU      4,859.2      (372.4)     156.9
SEALED AIR CORP   SDA TH          4,859.2      (372.4)     156.9
SEALED AIR CORP   SDA QT          4,859.2      (372.4)     156.9
SERES THERAPEUTI  MCRB1EUR EU       133.0       (13.3)      64.8
SERES THERAPEUTI  MCRB US           133.0       (13.3)      64.8
SERES THERAPEUTI  1S9 GR            133.0       (13.3)      64.8
SHELL MIDSTREAM   49M GR          1,870.4      (320.8)     177.1
SHELL MIDSTREAM   49M TH          1,870.4      (320.8)     177.1
SHELL MIDSTREAM   SHLX US         1,870.4      (320.8)     177.1
SHELL MIDSTREAM   49M QT          1,870.4      (320.8)     177.1
SIGA TECH INC     SIGA US           128.3      (341.3)    (258.9)
SINO UNITED WORL  SUIC US             0.0        (0.1)      (0.1)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO GR          8,299.2    (1,370.6)  (2,462.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO TH          8,299.2    (1,370.6)  (2,462.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI AV         8,299.2    (1,370.6)  (2,462.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRIUSD EU      8,299.2    (1,370.6)  (2,462.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI US         8,299.2    (1,370.6)  (2,462.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO QT          8,299.2    (1,370.6)  (2,462.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI TE         8,299.2    (1,370.6)  (2,462.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRIEUR EU      8,299.2    (1,370.6)  (2,462.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO GZ          8,299.2    (1,370.6)  (2,462.2)
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  6FE GR          2,610.4      (152.0)    (253.4)
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  SIXEUR EU       2,610.4      (152.0)    (253.4)
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  SIX US          2,610.4      (152.0)    (253.4)
SLEEP NUMBER COR  SL2 GR            470.4       (21.2)    (251.8)
SLEEP NUMBER COR  SNBR US           470.4       (21.2)    (251.8)
SLEEP NUMBER COR  SNBREUR EU        470.4       (21.2)    (251.8)
SONIC CORP        SONC US           545.5      (273.3)      45.6
SONIC CORP        SO4 GR            545.5      (273.3)      45.6
SONIC CORP        SO4 TH            545.5      (273.3)      45.6
SONIC CORP        SONCUSD EU        545.5      (273.3)      45.6
SONIC CORP        SONCEUR EU        545.5      (273.3)      45.6
STARCO BRANDS IN  STCB US             0.1        (0.8)      (0.8)
TAILORED BRANDS   TLRDEUR EU      1,945.8       (37.2)     540.2
TAILORED BRANDS   TLRD US         1,945.8       (37.2)     540.2
TAILORED BRANDS   WRM GR          1,945.8       (37.2)     540.2
TAILORED BRANDS   WRM TH          1,945.8       (37.2)     540.2
TAILORED BRANDS   TLRDUSD EU      1,945.8       (37.2)     540.2
TAILORED BRANDS   TLRD* MM        1,945.8       (37.2)     540.2
TAUBMAN CENTERS   TU8 GR          4,362.2      (201.4)       -
TAUBMAN CENTERS   TCO US          4,362.2      (201.4)       -
TENABLE HOLDINGS  TENB US           155.6      (106.9)     (82.0)
TENABLE HOLDINGS  TE7 GR            155.6      (106.9)     (82.0)
TENABLE HOLDINGS  TE7 GZ            155.6      (106.9)     (82.0)
TENABLE HOLDINGS  TE7 QT            155.6      (106.9)     (82.0)
TENABLE HOLDINGS  TE7 TH            155.6      (106.9)     (82.0)
TESARO INC        TSRO US           810.5       (21.5)     573.2
TESARO INC        T8S TH            810.5       (21.5)     573.2
TESARO INC        TSROUSD EU        810.5       (21.5)     573.2
TESARO INC        T8S QT            810.5       (21.5)     573.2
TESARO INC        TSROEUR EU        810.5       (21.5)     573.2
TESARO INC        T8S GR            810.5       (21.5)     573.2
TOWN SPORTS INTE  T3D GR            255.8       (72.5)      (7.4)
TOWN SPORTS INTE  CLUB US           255.8       (72.5)      (7.4)
TOWN SPORTS INTE  CLUBEUR EU        255.8       (72.5)      (7.4)
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDG US         11,804.5    (2,098.5)   2,568.2
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D GR         11,804.5    (2,098.5)   2,568.2
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D TH         11,804.5    (2,098.5)   2,568.2
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDGEUR EU      11,804.5    (2,098.5)   2,568.2
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D QT         11,804.5    (2,098.5)   2,568.2
TRILOGY INTERNAT  TRL CN            709.9       (12.5)     (16.7)
TRIUMPH GROUP     TG7 GR          3,420.0      (226.6)     292.1
TRIUMPH GROUP     TGI US          3,420.0      (226.6)     292.1
TRIUMPH GROUP     TGIEUR EU       3,420.0      (226.6)     292.1
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP GR          1,338.1      (175.5)     (64.2)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP US          1,338.1      (175.5)     (64.2)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP TH          1,338.1      (175.5)     (64.2)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP1EUR EU      1,338.1      (175.5)     (64.2)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP1USD EU      1,338.1      (175.5)     (64.2)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP QT          1,338.1      (175.5)     (64.2)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP GZ          1,338.1      (175.5)     (64.2)
UNISYS CORP       UIS EU          2,370.9    (1,244.1)     413.1
UNISYS CORP       USY1 TH         2,370.9    (1,244.1)     413.1
UNISYS CORP       USY1 GR         2,370.9    (1,244.1)     413.1
UNISYS CORP       UIS US          2,370.9    (1,244.1)     413.1
UNISYS CORP       UIS1 SW         2,370.9    (1,244.1)     413.1
UNISYS CORP       UISEUR EU       2,370.9    (1,244.1)     413.1
UNISYS CORP       UISCHF EU       2,370.9    (1,244.1)     413.1
UNISYS CORP       USY1 QT         2,370.9    (1,244.1)     413.1
UNISYS CORP       USY1 GZ         2,370.9    (1,244.1)     413.1
UNITI GROUP INC   CSALUSD EU      4,471.7    (1,289.8)       -
UNITI GROUP INC   8XC GR          4,471.7    (1,289.8)       -
UNITI GROUP INC   UNIT US         4,471.7    (1,289.8)       -
VALVOLINE INC     VVV US          1,849.0      (288.0)     365.0
VALVOLINE INC     0V4 GR          1,849.0      (288.0)     365.0
VALVOLINE INC     0V4 TH          1,849.0      (288.0)     365.0
VALVOLINE INC     VVVEUR EU       1,849.0      (288.0)     365.0
VALVOLINE INC     0V4 QT          1,849.0      (288.0)     365.0
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR US          1,333.9      (428.7)     164.9
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR GR          1,333.9      (428.7)     164.9
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGREUR EU       1,333.9      (428.7)     164.9
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR QT          1,333.9      (428.7)     164.9
VERISIGN INC      VRS TH          1,911.6    (1,381.0)     307.7
VERISIGN INC      VRS GR          1,911.6    (1,381.0)     307.7
VERISIGN INC      VRSN US         1,911.6    (1,381.0)     307.7
VERISIGN INC      VRSN* MM        1,911.6    (1,381.0)     307.7
VERISIGN INC      VRS QT          1,911.6    (1,381.0)     307.7
VERISIGN INC      VRSNEUR EU      1,911.6    (1,381.0)     307.7
VERISIGN INC      VRS GZ          1,911.6    (1,381.0)     307.7
W&T OFFSHORE INC  WTI US            958.2      (507.4)     (55.7)
W&T OFFSHORE INC  UWV GR            958.2      (507.4)     (55.7)
W&T OFFSHORE INC  WTI1EUR EU        958.2      (507.4)     (55.7)
WAYFAIR INC- A    W US            1,287.3      (195.5)     (96.3)
WAYFAIR INC- A    1WF QT          1,287.3      (195.5)     (96.3)
WAYFAIR INC- A    WUSD EU         1,287.3      (195.5)     (96.3)
WAYFAIR INC- A    1WF GR          1,287.3      (195.5)     (96.3)
WAYFAIR INC- A    1WF TH          1,287.3      (195.5)     (96.3)
WAYFAIR INC- A    WEUR EU         1,287.3      (195.5)     (96.3)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTW US          1,336.6      (923.0)     (88.2)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 GR          1,336.6      (923.0)     (88.2)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTWUSD EU       1,336.6      (923.0)     (88.2)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTWEUR EU       1,336.6      (923.0)     (88.2)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 QT          1,336.6      (923.0)     (88.2)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 TH          1,336.6      (923.0)     (88.2)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 GZ          1,336.6      (923.0)     (88.2)
WESTERN UNION     WU US           9,115.6      (451.3)    (813.3)
WESTERN UNION     W3U TH          9,115.6      (451.3)    (813.3)
WESTERN UNION     W3U GR          9,115.6      (451.3)    (813.3)
WESTERN UNION     W3U QT          9,115.6      (451.3)    (813.3)
WESTERN UNION     WUEUR EU        9,115.6      (451.3)    (813.3)
WESTERN UNION     W3U GZ          9,115.6      (451.3)    (813.3)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WOW US          2,196.8      (422.4)     (95.7)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WU5 QT          2,196.8      (422.4)     (95.7)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WOW1EUR EU      2,196.8      (422.4)     (95.7)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WU5 TH          2,196.8      (422.4)     (95.7)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WU5 GR          2,196.8      (422.4)     (95.7)
WINDSTREAM HOLDI  B4O2 GR        10,839.8    (1,406.5)    (406.3)
WINDSTREAM HOLDI  WIN US         10,839.8    (1,406.5)    (406.3)
WINDSTREAM HOLDI  B4O2 TH        10,839.8    (1,406.5)    (406.3)
WINDSTREAM HOLDI  WIN2USD EU     10,839.8    (1,406.5)    (406.3)
WINGSTOP INC      WING1EUR EU       124.1      (140.7)      (6.7)
WINGSTOP INC      WING US           124.1      (140.7)      (6.7)
WINGSTOP INC      EWG GR            124.1      (140.7)      (6.7)
WINMARK CORP      WINA US            48.8       (20.8)       7.9
WINMARK CORP      GBZ GR             48.8       (20.8)       7.9
WORKIVA INC       WKEUR EU          181.7       (17.7)     (21.7)
WORKIVA INC       WK US             181.7       (17.7)     (21.7)
WORKIVA INC       0WKA GR           181.7       (17.7)     (21.7)
WYNDHAM DESTINAT  WD5 GR          7,075.0      (520.0)    (138.0)
WYNDHAM DESTINAT  WYND US         7,075.0      (520.0)    (138.0)
WYNDHAM DESTINAT  WD5 TH          7,075.0      (520.0)    (138.0)
WYNDHAM DESTINAT  WYNUSD EU       7,075.0      (520.0)    (138.0)
WYNDHAM DESTINAT  WD5 QT          7,075.0      (520.0)    (138.0)
WYNDHAM DESTINAT  WYNEUR EU       7,075.0      (520.0)    (138.0)
XERIUM TECHNOLOG  TXRN GR           547.2      (151.0)      72.0
XERIUM TECHNOLOG  XRM US            547.2      (151.0)      72.0
YELLOW PAGES LTD  YLWDF US          544.3      (182.3)      70.9
YELLOW PAGES LTD  Y CN              544.3      (182.3)      70.9
YELLOW PAGES LTD  YMI GR            544.3      (182.3)      70.9
YELLOW PAGES LTD  YEUR EU           544.3      (182.3)      70.9
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 GR         1,644.5      (344.1)     182.2
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YRCWUSD EU      1,644.5      (344.1)     182.2
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 QT         1,644.5      (344.1)     182.2
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YRCWEUR EU      1,644.5      (344.1)     182.2
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YRCW US         1,644.5      (344.1)     182.2
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 TH         1,644.5      (344.1)     182.2
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR TH          4,326.0    (7,247.0)     279.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR GR          4,326.0    (7,247.0)     279.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMEUR EU       4,326.0    (7,247.0)     279.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR QT          4,326.0    (7,247.0)     279.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMCHF EU       4,326.0    (7,247.0)     279.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM SW          4,326.0    (7,247.0)     279.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM US          4,326.0    (7,247.0)     279.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR SW          4,326.0    (7,247.0)     279.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMUSD SW       4,326.0    (7,247.0)     279.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMUSD EU       4,326.0    (7,247.0)     279.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR GZ          4,326.0    (7,247.0)     279.0



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2018.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***