/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/180912.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Wednesday, September 12, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 254

                            Headlines

1265 MCBRIDE: Taps USA Tax Appeals as Appraiser
2018 HOUSES: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
508 ROUNDHILL: Hires Sotheby's International as Real Estate Agent
581 HIGUERA RESTAURANT: Taps Blonsley Law as Legal Counsel
7215 N OAKLEY: May Use MRR Cash Collateral on Final Basis

8800 LLC: Taps Levene Neale as Bankruptcy Counsel
999 PRIVATE JET: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
ABE'S BOAT: Plan Outline Hearing Scheduled for Oct. 2
ACI CONCRETE: Has Authorization to Continue Using Cash Collateral
ALABAMA AIRCRAFT: Ct. Partly Grants Summary Judgment Bid vs Boeing

ALPHA NATURAL: 4th Cir. Upholds Dismissal of Mar-Bow Appeals
ALTERNATIVE WELL: Taps Heller Draper as Legal Counsel
AMEJ CORPORATION: To Pay $1K Monthly to Unsecured Creditors Pool
APPALACHIAN LIGHTING: Hires R.E. Lane, LLC as Accountant
ARCHER NORRIS: Taps BPM LLP as Financial Advisor

ARCHER NORRIS: Taps Diamond McCarthy LLP as Special Counsel
ARCHER NORRIS: Taps Felderstein Fitzgerald as Legal Counsel
AUTO MASTERS: Hires Atwood & Mcvay, LLP, as Special Counsel
BAYOU HAVEN: Court Junks BLA Bid for Relief from Automatic Stay
BEDFORD PROPERTIES: May Use Up To $142,000 in Cash Collateral

BJT GROUP: Oct. 23 Plan and Disclosure Statement Hearing
BLACKSTONE DEVELOPERS: Creditors to Get 100% Payment Under Plan
BROOKSTONE HOLDINGS: Committee Taps Bayard as Co-Counsel
BROOKSTONE HOLDINGS: Committee Taps Cooley as Lead Counsel
BROOKSTONE HOLDINGS: Committee Taps Province as Financial Advisor

BROWARD COLLISION: Trustee Taps KapilaMukamal as Accountant
BSC HOLDINGS: Taps Thompson Burton PLLC as Special Counsel
CAMBER ENERGY: Provides an Update on Recent Workover Activities
CAMERON WOODS: Taps McCallar Law Firm as Counsel
CARVANA CO: Moody's Gives B3 CFR & Rates $300MM Unsec. Notes Caa2

CARVANA CO: S&P Assigns CCC+ Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
CIRCULATORY CENTERS: Trustee Taps Bernstein as Special Counsel
CK ASSISTED: Plan Outline OK'd; Nov. 1 Plan Confirmation Hearing
CLICKAWAY CORP: Taps BPM LLP as Financial Consultant
CLICKAWAY CORP: Taps Wendel Rosen as Special Counsel

CM RESORT: Ct. Abates Appeal Pending Resolution of Bankruptcy Case
COLOR SPOT: WNL, et al., Bid for Limited Stay Pending Appeal Nixed
CONCORDIA INTERNATIONAL: Provides Update on Recapitalization
CONGOLEUM CORP: Court Rejects BIW's Bid to Dismiss Complaint
CONTURA ENERGY: Moody's Hikes CFR to B2 & Rates New $600MM Loan B3

CORNERSTONE HOMES: Oct. 5 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
DAIRY ROAD: District Court Dismisses TAC vs Maui Gas, Paul Cheng
DASK LLC: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
DESTINY WORD: Taps Rogers Law Offices as Legal Counsel
DIVERSIFIED POWER: Unsecureds to be Paid 0.006% Over 10 Years

DOMINO ONE: Case Summary & 6 Unsecured Creditors
DORIAN LPG: Says it Will Respond to BW's Proposal in Due Course
DOUBLE EAGLE: New Plan to Pay Unsecureds in Full with No Interest
DUNLEVIE HOLDINGS: Taps McCallar Law Firm as Counsel
ECS REFINING: Trustee Seeks Approval on 7th Cash Collateral Use

EDEN HOME: Seeks Court Approval to Employ OCPs
ELKHORN JONES: Taps Larson Zirzow as Legal Counsel
ENOVA INTERNATIONAL: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable & Affirms 'B' ICR
ENRIQUE GREENBERG: 1st Cir. Dismisses Appeals as Moot
ENTERPRISE ELECTRIC: Taps CliftonLarsonAllen as Accountant

FM 544 PARK VISTA: Bankr. Ct. Approves Trustee's Plan Modifications
FOODSERVICEWAREHOUSE: PMP Summary Ruling Bid vs RSL Partly Granted
FRASER'S BOILER: Court Tosses Travelers' Bid for Leave to Appeal
GATEWAY HOLDING: Taps FL Legal Group as Legal Counsel
GREGORY JOHN TE VELDE: Milk Proceeds Not Subject to Service Lien

GUILBEAU MARINE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
HMSW CPA: Case Summary & 19 Unsecured Creditors
HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES: Incurs $1 Million Net Loss in 3rd Quarter
INDUSTRIAL STEEL: Sept. 19 Plan Confirmation Hearing
INTELLICARE NETWORK: Taps Stumbo Hanson as Legal Counsel

J & M SALES: Taps Imperial Capital as Investment Banker
J.P. QUESOS: Taps Realty Executives as Real Estate Broker
JAZPAL LLC: Taps David W. Cohen as Legal Counsel
JC FITS: Seeks Approval on 2nd PBC Cash Collateral Stipulation
JONES ENERGY: Effects 1-for-20 Reverse Common Stock Split

K COLBERT CAPITAL: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
KAI INDUSTRIES: Trustee Taps Levene, Neale as Bankruptcy Counsel
KARA HOMES: Condo Assoc. Claims Accrued Prior to Plan Confirmation
KHADER KAMAL AZZOUZ: Loses Lawsuit vs. Annab
KSA INVESTMENTS: Ch. 11 Trustee Taps Offit Kurman as Counsel

LENNAR CORP: CACC Suit Stayed Anew Pending Resolution of Bnkr. Case
MACK-CALI REALTY: Moody's Cuts Preferred Shelf Rating to (P)Ba3
MARRONE BIO: Waddell & Reed Reports 25.1% Stake
MELINTA THERAPEUTICS: FMR LLC Has 5.6% Stake as of Sept. 7
MID-SOUTH GEOTHERMAL: Unsecureds to be Paid from Annual Net Profits

MOGUL ENERGY: Drops Bid to Hire Bentley as Financial Advisor
MOLYCORP MINERALS: Court Narrows Claims in Trustee Suit vs WMNC
MONTREIGN OPERATING: Moody's Cuts CFR and Term Loans A & B to Caa3
NEOVASC INC: Faces Lawsuit in New Jersey Over Tiara Device
NEOVASC INC: Granted Until Oct. 15 to Regain Nasdaq Compliance

NEWARK SPECIAL: Hires Joseph L. Pittera as Bankruptcy Counsel
NORTHERN OIL: Launches Consent Solicitation Regarding Secured Notes
NUTMEG MUSIC: Gets Final Authority to Use Citibank Cash Collateral
NUVERRA ENVIRONMENTAL: Dist. Court Affirms Plan Confirmation Order
OFF THE GRID: Hires Lewis R. Landau as General Bankruptcy Counsel

OLEGNA FUSCHI-AIBEL: Court Junks Complaint vs BNYMTC, SPSI
ONE HUNDRED FOLD: To Pay Unsecs. in Full at 1% in 60 Installments
PACIFIC DRILLING: Court Approves KEIP for $13 Million
PACIFIC DRILLING: Court OKs Second Lien Commitment Agreement
PACIFIC DRILLING: Seeks Court OK for $85MM in DIP Financing

PACIFIC DRILLING: Seeks Court OK of Equity Commitment Agreement
PATRIOT NATIONAL: Claims in Aspen Suit vs E. Snow, et al., Narrowed
PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS: KMT Loses Summary Ruling Bid in Trust Suit
PRESSURE CONTROL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
PRIMERA ENERGY: Court Junks Patek, et al., Bid for Reconsideration

PURE PRESBYTERIAN: Enforcement of Merger with Grace of God Upheld
RESIDENTIAL FUNDING: Summary Ruling Bid vs ALTF et al., Partly OK'd
RITCHIE RISK-LINKED: Unsecureds to Get 75%-100% Under Plan
RMH FRANCHISE: Plan Sponsor to Infuse $10MM Capital
RODEO ROOFING: Seeks Authorization on Cash Collateral Use

SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT INT'L: Moody's Assigns Ba3 CFR, Outlook Stable
SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT INT'L: S&P Assigns 'BB-' ICR, Outlook Stable
SHARING ECONOMY: EC Tech Inks Services Agreement with Coassets
SOUTHEASTERN GROCERS: Must Pay Rent Based on Total Gross Revenues
STEADYMED LTD: Suspending Filing of Reports with the SEC

STONEMOR PARTNERS: Jeffrey DiGiovanni Appointed as GP's CAO
TAG MOBILE: Committee Objects to Disclosure Statement
TAG MOBILE: Creditors Seek Amendment of Plan and Disclosures
TAG MOBILE: SSB Opposses Approval of Proposed Plan Outline
TEXAS PELLETS: Taps BDO USA as New Insurance Consultant

THREE CHIEFS: Taps Kogan Law Firm as Legal Counsel
TRAVERSE MIDSTREAM: S&P Affirms 'B+' ICR, Outlook Stable
TRINITY 83 DEVELOPMENT: Hires Clingen Callow as Appeals Counsel
TRUE SECURITY: Hires Buechler & Garber as Bankruptcy Counsel
VANGUARD HEALTH: Unsecured Claims Total $1MM Under Latest Plan

WALLACE RUSH: Court Junks Bid to Withdraw Reference of Tort Claims
WESTMORELAND COAL: Inks Second Amended Bridge Loan Agreement
WORLDSPACE INC: Court Dismisses Fraunhofer Suit vs Sirius XM
YOGA80 INC: Seeks Final Approval on Cash Collateral Use
YOSI SAMRA: Unsecureds to Recoup 15% Under Chapter 11 Plan

[*] George Barry Cauthen to Receive Bankruptcy Inn Alliance Award

                            *********

1265 MCBRIDE: Taps USA Tax Appeals as Appraiser
-----------------------------------------------
1265 McBride Ave., LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of New Jersey to hire an appraiser.

The Debtor proposes to employ USA Tax Appeals LLC to conduct an
appraisal of its commercial real property located at 1265-1267
McBride Avenue, Woodland Park, New Jersey.

The firm will be paid $3,500 for its services.

Ryan Smith, an appraiser employed with USA Tax Appeals, disclosed
in a court filing that he and his firm are "disinterested" as
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Ryan Smith
     US Tax Appeals LLC
     10 Henry Beach Court
     Montville, NJ 07045

                      About 1265 McBride Ave.

1265 McBride Ave. LLC owns a real property located at 1265-1267
McBridge Avenue Woodland Park, New Jersey, having an appraised
value of $6.63 million.

1265 McBride sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-22659) on June 22, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Thomas J. O'Beirne, sole member, the Debtor
disclosed $6.65 million in assets and $6.67 million in
liabilities.

Judge John K. Sherwood presides over the case.  The Debtor tapped
Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC as its legal counsel; and Steven
A. Reiss & Company, LLC as its accountant.


2018 HOUSES: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
-------------------------------------------------------
2018 Houses, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas to authorize the use of cash collateral.

The Debtor has estimated the amounts due on each of the liens on
each of the properties and the monthly payments of principal and
interest necessary to service each of these obligations. The Debtor
shows its budget, including these payments, to be as follows:

                                       PITI              Management

                                       Payment           Fee  
                                       =======           ==========

     500 Highmoor Court                $1,250               $160
     1509 Spa Court                    $1,000               $140
     2744 Club Ridge Drive             $1,500               $185
     8313 Rocky Court                  $1,500               $190
     8608 GrayShale Drive              $1,250               $159

The Debtors offer following adequate protection for the Interim and
Final Cash Collateral Order to the extent any cash is considered
collateral on any of these liens regarding all first lien holders
on the Debtor's Properties:

     (a) Each lender will be granted replacement liens in cash,
subject to a determination by the Court that Lenders hold a fully
perfected, enforceable prepetition lien on cash, with the
exceptions and provisions that follow, with the same priority as
the Lenders' prepetition liens, if any, and solely to the extent
that the value of Lenders' collateral, on an aggregate basis,
diminishes as a result of the use of Cash Collateral authorized by
the Court;

     (b) The Replacement Liens will not prime any validly attached
and properly perfected lien held by a third party on specific
property of the Debtor as of the Petition Date;

     (c) The Replacement Liens will not attach to chapter 5 actions
of the Debtor or the proceeds of the recovery upon such actions;

     (d) Except for post-petition cash generated from operations,
the Replacement Liens will not attach to any unencumbered property
of the Debtor, if any, or the proceeds from any sale of any
unencumbered property, and the proceeds from any sale of any
unencumbered property will be deposited into a separate
unencumbered account and, absent further order of the Court, will
not be subject to the Replacement Liens;

     (e) Any prepetition cash collateral in such accounts will be
deemed "last out" of such accounts, except to the extent that any
expense of the Debtor is surcharged by the Court against such
prepetition cash as allowed by section 506(c) of the Bankruptcy
Code;

     (f) The Replacement Liens will attach only to the extent that
cash used by the Debtor is ultimately determined by the Court to be
Cash Collateral of the Lenders;

     (g) The Replacement Liens will not apply to any reduction in
cash value caused from the payment of an expense that is later
surcharged against Lenders' collateral based on Section 506(c) of
the Bankruptcy Code;

     (h) Subject to the limiting conditions on the Replacement
Liens, the Replacement Liens will be binding upon any subsequently
appointed chapter 11 or chapter 7 trustee;

     (i) The cash will be used to continue the operations of the
Debtor and therefore maintain the going concern value of the
aggregate of the Lenders' collateral; as such, the use of cash will
be regulated by a pre-approved budget to assure that appropriate
operating expenses are being paid and that no inappropriate expense
is paid;

     (j) The cash will be used in part to maintain insurance on the
Debtor's collateral and all other of the Debtor's assets;

     (k) The use of Cash Collateral may be terminated by the Court
on motion, after notice and hearing, if the Court determines that
the Lenders are no longer adequately protected.

The Debtor intends to seek a provision in the final Cash Collateral
Order providing a carve out for approved estate professionals,
including but not limited to, Debtor's counsel, any counsel for a
statutorily formed committee, as well as any United States' Trustee
Fees.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb18-33028-37.pdf

                        About 2018 Houses

2018 Houses is a Texas limited liability company formed for the
purpose of owning and renting various single family residential
properties.

2018 Houses, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Case No. 18-33028), on June 4, 2018.  In the petition signed by Dan
Blackburn, manager, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of
less than $500,000.  The Law Office of Robert W Buccholz PC, serves
as counsel to the Debtor.


508 ROUNDHILL: Hires Sotheby's International as Real Estate Agent
-----------------------------------------------------------------
508 Roundhill, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Connecticut (Bridgeport) to hire Sotheby's
International Realty, as a real estate agent/broker.

Professional services the Broker will render are:

     (a) represent the Debtor as his selling agent in the sale of
its real property known as 508 Round Hill Road, Greenwich, CT;

     (b) provide consulting services and sales assistance to the
Debtor regarding the sale of its property; and

     (c) provide such other brokerage services as may be required
from time to time.

The Broker shall perform said brokerage services for the Debtor
pursuant to the attached listing agreement, at a commission rate of
7.5% of the first year and 5% on any renewal thereof.

Stephen Archino, broker affiliated with Sotheby's International
Realty, attests that his firm is disinterested within the meaning
of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(14) and does not hold or represent any
interest that is adverse to the Debtor or the Debtor's Estate.

The agent can be reached through:

     Stephen Archino
     Sotheby's International Realty, Inc.
     One Pickwick Plaza
     Greenwich, CT 06830
     Tel: (203) 869-4343
     Fax: (203) 869-4303

                      About 508 Roundhill

508 Roundhill, LLC, is a privately held company in Greenwich,
Connecticut.  508 Roundhill filed for relief under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 18-50991) on Aug. 1,
2018.  In the petition signed by Sherri DeVito, manager, the Debtor
estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and liabilities.  The
case is assigned to Judge Julie A. Manning.  Scott M. Charmoy,
Esq., at Charmoy & Charmoy, is the Debtor's counsel.


581 HIGUERA RESTAURANT: Taps Blonsley Law as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
581 Higuera Restaurant Group, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to hire
Blonsley Law as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the administration of its assets and
liabilities; prepare a plan of reorganization; and provide other
legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

Blonsley Law will charge these hourly rates:

     Linda Blonsley, Esq.     $350
     Joseph Lopez             $150

Prior to the petition date, the firm received $15,000 from Las
Tablas Villas, LLC, which was paid from the account of the Ogden &
Fricks, LLP for the filing fee and attorneys' fees.  

Linda Blonsley, Esq., principal of Blonsley Law, disclosed in a
court filing that she and her firm are "disinterested persons" as
defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Linda S. Blonsley, Esq.
     Blonsley Law
     209 S Halcyon Road
     Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
     Tel: 805-904-6722
     Fax: 805-904-6724
     E-mail: blonsleylawecf@gmail.com
     E-mail: lblonsley@blonsleylaw.com

                About 581 Higuera Restaurant Group

581 Higuera Restaurant Group, LLC, filed as a domestic company in
California on Sept. 5, 2014, according to public records filed with
California Secretary of State.  The company listed its business as
single asset real estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section
101(51B)).

581 Higuera Restaurant Group sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No. 18-11391) on Aug.
24, 2018.  In the petition signed by John W. Belsher or Ryan
Petitit, managing member of PB Companies, LLC, the Debtor estimated
assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $1 million
to $10 million.  

Judge Deborah J. Saltzman presides over the case.


7215 N OAKLEY: May Use MRR Cash Collateral on Final Basis
---------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Deborah L. Thorne of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois authorized 7215 N Oakley, LLC, to use
the cash collateral of MRR 7215 Oakley LLC on a final basis.

The Debtor is authorized to use cash collateral to pay only (i)
those expenses set forth in the Budgets, in the amounts set forth
therein plus a 15% variance for any individual expense contained in
the Budget, and (ii) any other expenses approved by the Court.

MRR is granted, retroactive to the Petition Date, a valid,
enforceable, non-avoidable, and fully perfected replacement liens
of the highest available priority upon any property that the Debtor
acquires after the Petition Date, and any proceeds generated from
such property.  Said liens will attach to the same extent and with
same validity and priority as MMR's existing interests in the
Prepetition Collateral, limited to the extent of the aggregate
diminution subsequent to the Petition Date in the value of MMR's
existing interests in the Prepetition Collateral, and will be
subject only to prior perfected and unavoidable liens in property
of the Debtor's estate as of the Petition Date.

MRR 7215 Oakley LLC and MRC 1955 Halsted Loan, LLC must each file a
proof of claim in Debtor's bankruptcy case, and any objections to
the claims of MRR or MRC must be filed by the Debtor on or before
September 17, 2018.

Commencing September 10, 2018 and the 10th day of each month
thereafter, the Debtor will provide MRR with copies of its most
recent bank statement and a list of open payables as of the last
day of the prior month.

The Debtor's authority to use cash collateral will terminate on the
earlier of: (a) the expiration of the Budget Period or the
occurrence of any of following Event of Default:

     (a) Use of cash collateral to pay an expense not delineated on
the Budget or in an amount in excess of the Budgeted amount, which
use was not otherwise consented to by MRR or use of the cash
collateral for an expense not relating to the Real Estate except
for necessary and approved administrative expenses or fees that
have been approved by the Court, and uses of cash collateral
otherwise consented to by MRR;

     (b) Dismissal or conversion to Chapter 7 of Debtor's Chapter
11 case;

     (c) Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee for Debtor;

     (d) Entry of an Order by the Court that grants a lien or
security interest in any of MRR's Pre-Petition or Post-Petition
Collateral which lien is senior in priority to, or pari passu with,
either or both of MRR's Pre-Petition or Post-Petition Lien; and

     (e) Reversal or modification of the Order on appeal or
otherwise.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb18-07309-59.pdf

                        About 7215 N Oakley

7215 N Oakley LLC is an Illinois limited liability corporation with
its principal offices located at 30 Coventry Road, Northfield,
Illinois 60093.  7215 N Oakley listed its business as Single Asset
Real Estate as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B).

7215 N Oakley filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case
No. 18-07309) on March 14, 2018.  In the petition signed by Nick
Stein, manager, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of at
least $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Deborah L.
Thorne.  Robert W Glantz, Esq., at Shaw Fishman Glantz & Towbin
LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


8800 LLC: Taps Levene Neale as Bankruptcy Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
8800 LLC sought and obtained approval from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Los
Angeles Division, to employ Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill
L.L.P. as general bankruptcy counsel.

Levene Neale will render these services:

     a. advising the Debtor with regard to the requirements of the
Bankruptcy Court, Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules and the Office
of the United States Trustee as they pertain to the Debtor;

     b. advising the Debtor with regard to certain rights and
remedies of its bankruptcy estate and the rights, claims and
interests of creditors;

     c. representing the Debtor in any proceeding or hearing in the
Bankruptcy Court involving its estate unless the Debtor is
represented in such proceeding or hearing by other special
counsel;

     d. conducting examinations of witnesses, claimants or adverse
parties and representing the Debtor in any adversary proceeding
except to the extent that any such adversary proceeding is in an
area outside of Levene Neale's expertise or which is beyond Levene
Neale's staffing capabilities;

     e. preparing and assisting the Debtor in the preparation of
reports, applications, pleadings and orders including, but not
limited to, applications to employ professionals, interim
statements and operating reports, initial filing requirements,
schedules and statement of financial affairs, lease pleadings, cash
collateral pleadings, financing pleadings, and pleadings with
respect to the Debtor's use, sale or lease of property outside the
ordinary course of business;

      f. representing the Debtor with regard to obtaining use of
debtor-in possession financing and/or cash collateral including,
but not limited to, negotiating and seeking Bankruptcy Court
approval of any debtor in possession financing and/or cash
collateral pleading or stipulation and preparing any pleadings
relating to obtaining use of debtor-in-possession financing and/or
cash collateral;

     g. assisting the Debtor in the negotiation, formulation,
preparation and confirmation of a plan of reorganization and the
preparation and approval of a disclosure statement in respect of
the plan; and

     h. performing any other services which may be appropriate in
Levene Neale's representation of the Debtor during its bankruptcy
case.

Levene Neale professionals who will work on the Debtor's case and
their hourly billing rates are:

     Martin J. Brill              $595
     David B. Golubchik           $595
     Jeffrey S. Kwong             $425

Levene Neale will seek reimbursement of expenses in accordance with
the rates set forth in the guidelines promulgated by the Office of
the United States Trustee.

The Retainer will be an advanced fee payment retainer, which Levene
Neale will maintain in a segregated account.

Levene Neale attests that it does not hold or represent any
interest materially adverse to the Debtor or the Debtor's estate.
The firm says it is a "disinterested person" as that term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.  According to
Mr. Brill, Levene Neale has no prior connection with the Debtor,
any creditors of the Debtor or its estate, or any other party in
interest in the case, or its respective attorneys or accountants,
the United States Trustee or any person employed by the United
States Trustee.

Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill L.L.P. can be reached at:

     Martin J. Brill, Esq.
     David B. Golubchik, Esq.
     Jeffrey S. Kwong, Esq.
     LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, YOO & BRILL L.L.P.
     10250 Constellation Boulevard, Suite 1700
     Los Angeles, CA 90067
     Telephone: (310) 229-1234
     Facsimile: (310) 229-1244
     Email: mjb@lnbyb.com
            dbg@lnbyb.com
            jsk@lnbyb.com

                         About 8800 LLC

8800 LLC is a privately held company whose principal assets are
located at 8800 Sunset Blvd. West Hollywood, CA 90069.  8800 LLC
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-17263) on
June 22, 2018.  In the petition signed by Alan Nathan, managing
member, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1 million
to $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Robert N. Kwan.  The
Debtor is represented by lawyers at Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo &
Brill L.L.P.



999 PRIVATE JET: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 999 Private Jet, LLC
        150 S. Rodeo Drive., Suite 290
        Beverly Hills, CA 90212

Business Description: 999 Private Jet, LLC is a privately
                      held company in Beverly Hills, California
                      that operates in the aviation industry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 10, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Case No.: 18-20537

Judge: Hon. Sandra R. Klein

Debtor's Counsel: Henrik Mosesi, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES OF HENRIK MOSESI
                  1540 W. Glenoaks Blvd., Suite 206
                  Glendale, CA 91201
                  Tel: 310-734-4269
                  Fax: 310-734-4053
                  E-mail: hmosesi@gmail.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Henrik Mosesi, managing member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's two unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-20537.pdf


ABE'S BOAT: Plan Outline Hearing Scheduled for Oct. 2
-----------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Elizabeth W. Magner will convene a hearing on Oct.
2, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. to consider the approval of Abe's Boat
Rentals, Inc.'s Disclosure Statement filed on August 31, 2018.

Sept. 25, 2018 is fixed as the last day for filing written
objections to the Disclosure Statement and for serving same.

                  About Abe's Boat Rentals

Abe's Boat Rentals, Inc. -- https://www.abesboatrental.com/ -- is a
privately-owned vessel operator located in Belle Chasse, Louisiana,
with a fleet of 19 vessels.  The Company's business segments have
expanded to also provide crews and vessels for environmental
construction, restoration projects and cleanup, plugging and
abandonment, rig decommissioning and other new markets.  Abe's Boat
Rentals was founded in 1979 by Abraham Ton.

Abe's Boat Rentals, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.
La. Case No. 18-11102) on April 27, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Hank Ton, president, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and liabilities.  Congeni Law Firm, LLC, is the
Debtor's counsel.


ACI CONCRETE: Has Authorization to Continue Using Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Dale L. Somers of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Kansas authorized ACI Concrete Placement of Kansas,
LLC, and its debtor-affiliates to continue using cash collateral in
the ordinary course of business.

All other terms and conditions of the prior Cash Collateral Order
will remain in effect, except as modified. Among others, the
paragraphs modified include the following:

     A. In addition to the adequate protection payment and adequate
protection liens granted to Equity Bank, the Debtors will further
provide to Equity Bank and the Official Unsecured Creditors
Committee the following:

         (a) All monthly income and balance sheets for the year
2018;

         (b) Required internal financial reports as outlined in any
Loan Agreement;

         (c) Any compilations prepared by outside accountants;

         (d) Year-to-date 2018 financial reports, including any
audit reports for such time period as available on all Debtors;

         (e) Current personal financial statement of the guarantor,
Larry Kaminsky, and guarantor, Matthew Kaminsky, effective as of
June 30, 2018;

         (f) Short quarter financial statements through August 31,
2018 (July 1 thru August 31);

         (g) Borrowing base certificates for accounts receivable on
a monthly basis;

         (h) Copies of filed corporate income tax returns for the
calendar year 2017 promptly upon completion or as submitted to the
appropriate taxing authority for all Debtors and guarantors,
together with all exhibits, schedules and attachments thereto;

         (i) All monthly submissions of financial and accounting
information to the United States Trustee;

         (j) All existing lease agreements and executory contracts;
and

         (k) A monthly summary of all pending work orders,
statements of construction work and scheduling reports for pending
work.

     B. Equity Bank and the Debtors have negotiated a time-line for
performance of actions to be taken, which are an additional form of
adequate protection under 11 U.S.C. Section 361. These additional
terms and conditions have been negotiated to provide for the timely
and orderly liquidation of excess equipment secured to Equity Bank,
to provide for a reduction of the pre-petition obligations due
Equity Bank and to reduce the outstanding obligations due Equity
Bank to facilitate takeout financing by a third-party lender
sufficient to satisfy in full any remaining pre-petition
obligations of Equity Bank. These terms and conditions include, but
are not limited to:

         (a) Monthly adequate protection payments of $50,000 as
required under the provisions of 11 U.S.C. Sections 361 and 362 as
outlined above, which may be made in two installments, the first
installment on or before the 10th day of each month and the second
installment on or before the 25th day of each month;

         (b) A written loan commitment from a reputable and known
third party lender to provide for the payment in full of the
outstanding allowed claim of Equity Bank. Such loan commitment will
have such usual and customary conditions concerning funding and
closing and will provide for a funding date sufficient to satisfy
in full the allowed claim of Equity Bank by October 31, 2018;

         (c) The completion of the sale of assets located in
Lincoln, Nebraska, and the payment of sale proceeds in the amount
of $ 1,075,000 to Equity Bank at sale closing and no later than
August 31, 2018. The Sale Proceeds are net of allowed U.S. Trustee
fees associated with the sale proceeds and net of the payoff
necessary of the LSK&M debt obligation to First State Bank & Trust
Company of Larned, Kansas.

         (d) In the event that the Lincoln, Nebraska sale of assets
does not close by August 31, 2018, and Equity Bank does not receive
the net proceeds of sale as set forth above, an Event of Default of
this Order will be declared. In addition, in the event that no firm
definitive loan commitment for "take-out financing" sufficient to
pay in full the allowed claim of Equity Bank is provided by August
31, 2018, the failure to obtain such loan commitment will be an
Event of Default.

         (e) As a result, Equity Bank's Motion for Relief From Stay
will be continued to September 14, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. unless the
Order for of Cash Collateral and Order of Adequate Protection is
further extended or an Event of Default occurs.

The Court will additionally conduct a status conference at the
September 14, 2018 hearing, to review the "take-out financing"
proposal of the Debtor and to set such deadlines as necessary to
facilitate the orderly administration of Debtors' Case.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/ksb17-21770-291.pdf

                  About ACI Concrete Placement

ACI Concrete Placement of Kansas LLC, ACI Concrete Placement of
Lincoln LLC, ACI Concrete Placement of Oklahoma LLC, OKK Equipment
LLC and KOK Holdings LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kan. Case Nos. 17-21770 to 17-21774) on
Sept. 14, 2017.  

Matthew Kaminsky, their chief operating officer, signed the
petitions.  

The cases are jointly administered.

Founded in 2007, ACI Concrete Placement provides concrete pumping
and telebelt material placement.  In addition to its traditional
concrete placement services, ACI specializes in slip form concrete
placement and separate placing booms.  It owns a fleet of over 55
machines for slope paving, indoor pumping, and small set up areas,
small line and grout pumps and truck mounted conveyors, etc.  ACI
Concrete is headquartered in Spring Hill, Kansas, with additional
locations in Nebraska, Missouri, and Oklahoma.

ACI-Kansas is wholly owned by debtor KOK Holdings, LLC.
ACI-Oklahoma, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company headquartered
in Kansas, owned by: Lawrence Kaminsky who owns 70% of the company
and Matthew Kaminsky who owns 30% of the company.  ACI-Lincoln, a
Nebraska Limited Liability Company headquartered in Kansas, owned
by: Lawrence Kaminsky who owns 70% of the company and Matthew
Kaminsky who owns 30% of the company.  KOK is owned by: Lawrence
Kaminsky who owns 50% of the company and Matthew Kaminsky who owns
50% of the company. OKK is wholly owned by the Debtor KOK Holdings,
LLC.

ACI-Kansas, ACI-Oklahoma and ACI-Lincoln function as concrete
pouring companies in their respective states.  OKK serves as the
common equipment ownership company for all ACI companies.  KOK
serves as the parent holding company of the various companies and
also functions as the payroll processor for the related ACI
companies. The same management structure operates all five Debtors
and their operations are centrally located in Spring Hill, Kansas.

At the time of the filing, ACI Kansas disclosed $1.06 million in
assets and $8.4 million in liabilities.

Judge Dale L. Somers presides over the cases.

Bradley D. McCormack, Esq., at the Sader Law Firm, serves as the
Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtors hired Duncan Financial
Group, LLC as financial consultant; Altus Global Trade Solutions as
collection agent; and GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC and
Tarsus CFO Services, LLC, as consultants.

On Nov. 1, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee is
represented by Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C.



ALABAMA AIRCRAFT: Ct. Partly Grants Summary Judgment Bid vs Boeing
------------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge R. David Proctor granted in part and denied in part
the plaintiffs' and the defendants' motions for summary judgment in
the case captioned ALABAMA AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC., ALABAMA
AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.--BIRMINGHAM, AND PEMCO AIRCRAFT
ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., Plaintiffs, v. THE BOEING COMPANY,
BOEING AEROSPACE OPERATIONS, INC. AND BOEING AEROSPACE SUPPORT
CENTER, Defendants, Case No. 2:11-cv-03577-RDP (N.D. Ala.).

This case relates to an award of Programmed Depot Maintenance work
for the United States Air Force's KC-135 Stratotanker fleet. Since
approximately 1969, Alabama Aircraft, Inc. had performed some of
this work in Jefferson County, Alabama. In February or March 2004,
Boeing and AAI began conversations about teaming together to bid
jointly on future KC-135 PDM work. After a long and circuitous
series of events, the work was awarded to Boeing. This case relates
to the events surrounding that award.

After a number of pleadings and motions, AAI filed its Third
Amended Complaint. The claims presently before the court are as
follows:

1. Count One is a Breach of Contract claim alleging that Boeing
improperly terminated the Memorandum of Agreement executed on
September 6, 2005 (MOA) and failed to award it 50% of the planes
under the 2005 Work Share Agreement (WSA);

2. Count Two is a Declaratory Judgment claim regarding the
application of the Limitation of Liability clause in the MOA to
Count One;

3. Count Three is a Breach of Contract claim alleging that Boeing
breached the Non-Disclosure Agreement executed on June 3, 2005
(NDA);

4. Count Four is a Declaratory Judgment claim regarding the
application of the Limitation of Liability clause in the MOA to
Count Three; and

5. Count Seven is a Suppression of Fact claim regarding Boeing's
Bridge Contract for KC-135 PDM work.

AAI argues that it is entitled to a partial summary judgment on
counts One through Four. It asserts that (a) Boeing is liable under
Count One alleging breach of the MOA; (b) Boeing is liable under
Count Three alleging breach of the NDA; and (c) it is entitled to a
declaration that the limitation of liability provision in Section
11.1 of the MOA does not limit the damages that AAI can seek under
Counts Two and Four for breach of the MOA or the NDA.

Boeing opposes AAI's motion and further contends that it is
entitled to summary judgment in this case. It claims that (a) under
Counts Two and Four, the limitation of liability clause in the MOA
is enforceable and applies to AAI's contract claims; (b) under
Counts One and Three, AAI failed to perform under the MOA, Boeing
did not breach the MOA, and, in any event, AAI cannot show a causal
link between any alleged breach and the damages it claims; and (c)
as to Count VII, regarding the Bridge Contract, Boeing did not
fraudulently suppress any material information that it was under a
duty to provide to AAI.

On the breach of contract claim, the Court holds that because the
contact is ambiguous, the object of the court's current inquiry is
to determine the "true intent of the parties."  The record evidence
shows that the parties had competing interests and competing
intents. Thus, a question of fact is raised as to whether there was
actually a meeting of the minds on the termination issue.
Therefore, the court finds that genuine issues of material fact
remain to be resolved by a jury on the claim that Boeing's
termination of the MOA pursuant to section 5.0(c) was in breach of
the MOA.

AAI also argues that, in addition to breaching the MOA, Boeing also
breached the WSA and the exclusive teaming arrangement found in
section 1.1 of the MOA.

In the MOA, the parties expressly agreed that "[t]ermination of the
MOA shall not abrogate any Party's obligations regarding
Proprietary Information disclosed prior to the effective date of
termination." That is, both sides expressly agreed that the
obligations under the NDA would survive termination of the MOA.
Thus, it is clear that the parties knew how to contractually
provide for certain obligations to survive termination of the
agreement. They did not include similar language in connection with
the WSA. Nor did they do so for the exclusive teaming arrangement
in section 1.1 of the MOA. Therefore, the court concludes that
those obligations did not survive the termination of the MOA.
Boeing is entitled to summary judgment AAI's claim that it breached
the WSA and/or the exclusive teaming arrangement in section 1.1 of
the MOA.

Boeing further argues that is it entitled to summary judgment on
AAI's breach of contract claims because AAI cannot establish that
Boeing's alleged breach caused its alleged harm.

After careful review, under the circumstances of this case,
Boeing's argument that is it entitled to summary judgment due to
AAI's failure to prove damages caused by its breach is without
merit.

AAI also argues that it has established as a matter of law that
Boeing breached the NDA by using its proprietary pricing
information to conduct an "apples to apples" comparison of AAI as a
prime contractor and allowing personnel with knowledge of AAI's
pricing to work on Boeing's solo bid.

In response, Boeing argues that AAI's own failure to perform under
the NDA renders it unable to recover on its breach of contract
claim, and that the information it possessed regarding AAI's
pricing as a subcontractor, rather than a prime, was irrelevant.
Boeing asserts that there is evidence in the record that even AAI
concluded that the information it provided to Boeing was "useless
even to AAI."

The court concludes that while AAI has presented evidence that
Boeing breached the NDA, there is also evidence submitted by Boeing
which creates a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Boeing
used AAI's proprietary information in violation of the NDA. At a
minimum, the following substantial evidence creates such a material
issue of fact.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated August 15,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2CpaTId from Leagle.com.

Special Master, Special Master, represented by David J.
Middlebrooks -- dmiddlebrooks@lehrmiddlebrooks.com -- LEHR
MIDDLEBROOKS & VREELAND PC.

Alabama Aircraft Industries Inc & Alabama Aircraft Industries Inc
Birmingham, Plaintiffs, represented by J. Michael Rediker --
mrediker@rumberger.com  -- RUMBERGER KIRK & CALDWELL PC, Joshua D.
Lerner -- jlerner@rumberger.com -- RUMBERG KIRK & CALDWELL PC, pro
hac vice, Meredith Jowers Lees -- mlees@rumberger.com -- RUMBERGER
KIRK CALDWELL PC, Peter Tepley -- ptepley@rumberger.com --
RUMBERGER KIRK & CALDWELL, R. Scott Williams --
swilliams@rumberger.com -- Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.C.,
Rebecca A. Beers -- rbeers@rumberger.com -- RUMBERGER KIRK &
CALDWELL PC, Reginald L. Jeter , LAW OFFICE OF CELESTE P ARMSTRONG
& Roger A. Brown , HASKELL SLAUGHTER YOUNG & REDIKER LLC.

Pemco Aircraft Engineering Services Inc, Plaintiff, represented by
J. Michael Rediker , RUMBERGER KIRK & CALDWELL PC, Joshua D. Lerner
, RUMBERG KIRK & CALDWELL PC, pro hac vice, Meredith Jowers Lees ,
RUMBERGER KIRK CALDWELL PC, Patricia C. Diak , HASKELL SLAUGHTER
YOUNG & REDIKER LLC, Peter Tepley , RUMBERGER KIRK & CALDWELL, R.
Scott Williams , Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.C., Rebecca A. Beers
, RUMBERGER KIRK & CALDWELL PC, Reginald L. Jeter , LAW OFFICE OF
CELESTE P ARMSTRONG & Roger A. Brown , HASKELL SLAUGHTER YOUNG &
REDIKER LLC.

The Boeing Company, Boeing Aerospace Operations Inc & Boeing
Aerospace Support Center, Defendants, represented by Alexia R.
Brancato -- alexia.brancato@kirkland.com -- KIRLAND & ELLIS LLP,
pro hac vice, Craig S. Primis – craig.primis@kirkland.com --
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Erin C. Johnston –
erin.johnston@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP,John C. O'Quinn  --
john.oquinn@kirkland.com --KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, John Thomas Richie
, BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS, LLP, Reed Thomas Warburton ,
BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS & Tia T. Trout-Perez , KIRKLAND &
ELLIS LLP.

                    About Alabama Aircraft

Birmingham, Alabama-based Alabama Aircraft Industries Inc.
--http://www.alabamaaircraft.com/-- provided aircraft maintenance
and modification services for the U.S. government and military
customers.  Its 190-acre facility, as well as its corporate office,
is located at the Birmingham International Airport.

Alabama Aircraft filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D. Del. Case No. 11-10452) on Feb. 15, 2011.  Two subsidiaries also
filed: Alabama Aircraft Industries, Inc.-Birmingham (Case No.
11-10453) and Pemco Aircraft Engineering Services, Inc. (Case No.
11-10454).

The Company said the primary goal of the Chapter 11 filing is to
address long-term indebtedness and, in particular, long-term
pension obligations.  The Company owed $68.5 million the Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corp. prepetition.

Joel A. Waite, Esq., and Kenneth J. Enos, Esq., at Young, Conaway,
Stargatt & Taylor, in Wilmington, Delaware, served as counsel to
the Debtors.  Alabama Aircraft estimated assets and debts of $1
million to $10 million as of the Chapter 11 filing.

The Debtor won Court authority at the end of August 2011 to sell
its assets to a unit of Kaiser Group Holdings Inc. for $500,000 and
up to $30 million in recoveries from potential litigation.

The Chapter 11 case was later converted to liquidation under
Chapter 7.


ALPHA NATURAL: 4th Cir. Upholds Dismissal of Mar-Bow Appeals
------------------------------------------------------------
In the consolidated appeals captioned MAR-BOW VALUE PARTNERS, LLC,
Creditor-Appellant, v. MCKINSEY RECOVERY & TRANSFORMATION SERVICES
US LLC, (Turnaround Advisor for Alpha Natural Resources),
Defendant-Appellee, and ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant. MAR-BOW VALUE PARTNERS, LLC, Creditor-Appellant, v.
MCKINSEY RECOVERY & TRANSFORMATION SERVICES US LLC,
Defendant-Appellee, Nos. 17-2268, 17-2269 (4th Cir.) Mar-Bow Value
Partners, LLC, appeals from the district court's orders dismissing
its appeals from numerous bankruptcy court orders in  Alpha Natural
Resources Holdings, Inc. Chapter 11 proceeding. The district court
dismissed the appeals as equitably moot and/or for lack of
standing.

Upon review of the record, as well as the parties' briefs, the U.S.
Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit finds no reversible error and
affirms for the reasons stated by the district court.

The Court denies Mar-Bow's motions for judicial notice, for leave
to file a supplemental brief, and to hold the appeals in abeyance,
and the Court dispenses with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

A copy of the Court's Decision dated August 24, 2018 is available
at https://bit.ly/2oVmgOy from Leagle.com.

Susan M. Freeman -- sfreeman@lrrc.com -- Daniel A. Arellano , LEWIS
ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP, Phoenix, Arizona; Steven Rhodes ,
STEVEN RHODES CONSULTING, LLC, Ann Arbor, Michigan; David R. Ruby
-- druby@t-mlaw.com -- William D. Prince IV -- wprince@t-mlaw.com
-- Michael G. Matheson -- mmatheson@t-mlaw.com --THOMPSONMCMULLAN,
P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Sheldon S. Toll , LAW OFFICES OF SHELDON
S. TOLL PLLC, Southfield, Michigan, for Appellant.

Bruce H. Matson -- bruce.matson@leclairryan.com -- Christopher L.
Perkins -- christopher.perkins@leclairryan.com -- LECLAIRRYAN,
PLLC, Richmond, Virginia;Martin J. Bienenstock , Ehud Barak ,
Joshua A. Esses , PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, New York, New York; Roy T.
Englert, Jr. , Lukman Azeez , ROBBINS, RUSSELL, ENGLERT, ORSECK,
UNTEREINER & SAUBER LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

              About Alpha Natural Resources

Headquartered in Bristol, Virginia, Alpha Natural --
http://www.alphanr.com/-- is a coal supplier, ranked second
largest among publicly traded U.S. coal producers as measured by
2014 consolidated revenues of $4.3 billion.  As of August 2015,
Alpha had 8,000 full time employees across many different states,
with UMWA representing 1,000 of the employees.

Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 15-33896)
and its affiliates filed separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions
on Aug. 3, 2015, listing $9.9 billion in total assets as of June
30, 2015, and $7.3 billion in total liabilities as of June 30,
2015.

The petitions were signed by Richard H. Verheij, executive vice
president, general counsel and corporate secretary.

Judge Kevin R. Huennekens presides over the cases.

David G. Heiman, Esq., Carl E. Black, Esq., and Thomas A. Wilson,
Esq., at Jones Day serve as the Debtors' general counsel.  Tyler P.
Brown, Esq., J.R. Smith, Esq., Henry P. (Toby) Long, III, Esq., and
Justin F. Paget, Esq., serve as the Debtors' local counsel.

Rothschild Group is the Debtors' financial advisor.  Alvarez &
Marshal Holdings, LLC, is the Debtors' investment banker.  Kurtzman
Carson Consultants, LLC, is the Debtors' claims and noticing
agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 4 appointed seven creditors of Alpha
Natural Resources Inc. to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors.  Dennis F. Dunne, Esq., Evan R. Fleck, Esq.,
and Eric K. Stodola, Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP;
and William A. Gray, Esq., W. Ashley Burgess, Esq., and Roy M.
Terry, Jr., Esq. at Sands Anderson PC, represent the Committee.

Alpha Natural Resources on July 7, 2016, said its plan of
reorganization has been confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court.  On July
26, Alpha Natural Resources and its affiliates emerged from Chapter
11 bankruptcy protection.  The reorganized company is a smaller,
privately held company operating 18 mines and eight preparation
plants in West Virginia and Kentucky.


ALTERNATIVE WELL: Taps Heller Draper as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Alternative Well Intervention, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana to hire
Heller, Draper, Patrick, Horn & Manthey, LLC as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the negotiation and documentation of
financing agreements, use of cash collateral and related
transactions; prepare a plan of reorganization; assist in any
potential property disposition; and provide other legal services
related to its Chapter 11 case.

Heller Draper will charge these hourly rates:

     William H. Patrick, III         $495   
     Tristan Manthey                 $455
     Other Members               $375 to $455
     Associates                  $175 to $255  
     Paralegals                   $80 to $120

Prior to the filing of the petition, the firm received a retainer
in the sum of $25,000, including the filing fee of $1,717.

Heller Draper is a "disinterested person" as defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Tristan Manthey, Esq.
     Cherie Dessauer Nobles, Esq.
     Heller, Draper, Patrick, Horn & Manthey, LLC
     650 Poydras Street, Suite 2500       
     New Orleans, LA 70130       
     Telephone: 504-299-3300       
     Facsimile: 504-299-3399       
     E-mail: tmanthey@hellerdraper.com        
     E-mail: cnobles@hellerdraper.com

                About Alternative Well Intervention

Alternative Well Intervention, LLC, sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 18-51098) on
Aug. 30, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated
assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.


AMEJ CORPORATION: To Pay $1K Monthly to Unsecured Creditors Pool
----------------------------------------------------------------
AMEJ Corporation filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas a disclosure statement describing its
plan of reorganization dated August 31, 2018.

The Debtor proposes to restructure its current indebtedness and
continue its operations to provide a dividend to the unsecured
creditors of Debtor.

Under the plan, all allowed unsecured creditors in Class 5 will
share pro rata in the unsecured creditors pool. The Debtor will
make monthly payments commencing on the Effective Date of $1,000
into the unsecured creditors pool. The Debtor will make
distributions to the Class 5 creditors every 90 days commencing 90
days after the Effective Date. The Debtor will make a total of 60
payments into the unsecured creditors pool with the first payment
being made on the Effective Date.

The Debtor anticipates the continued operations of the business to
fund the Plan. The Debtor believes that its projections are
conservative based upon the historical operations of the business.
Based upon the projections, the Debtor believes the Plan to be
feasible.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 31, 2018 is
available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb18-40682-11-43.pdf

                 About Amej Corporation

Amej Corporation, based in Bridgeport, Texas, is a gasoline service
station primarily engaged in selling gasoline and lubricating oils.
The Company also sells other merchandise, such as tires,
batteries, and other automobile parts, or perform minor repair
work.

AMEJ Corporation, based in Bridgeport, TX, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 18-40682) on Feb. 21, 2018.
The Hon. Russell F. Nelms presides over the case.  In the petition
signed by Cindy Tak, secretary, the Debtor estimated $1 million to
$10 million in both assets and liabilities.  Eric A. Liepins, Esq.,
at Eric A. Liepins, P.C., serves as bankruptcy counsel to the
Debtor.


APPALACHIAN LIGHTING: Hires R.E. Lane, LLC as Accountant
--------------------------------------------------------
Appalachian Lighting Systems, Inc., a/k/a Alled, seeks authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania to employ R.E. Lane, LLC, Certified Public Accountants
as accountants.

Services required of R.E. Lane are:

     1. prepare the Monthly Operating Report in a timely manner for
submission by the 20th of each month;

     2. help the accounting staff keep the books on the accrual
basis; and

     3. prepare all required federal, state, and local tax
returns.

The Debtor wishes to retain R.E. Lane, LLC, Certified Public
Accountants at the following hourly rates:

      a.) Monthly fees for the bookkeeping services will range from
$225.00 to $375.00.

      b.) Year-end tax return preparation will range from $750.00
to $1,250.00.

Mike Keefer, of R. E. Lane, LLC, attests that , neither he, nor
anyone in his firm has any connection with any creditor or any
party in interest, their respective attorneys and accountants, the
United States Trustee, or any person employed in the office of the
United States Trustee.

The accountant can be reached through:

     Mike Keefer, CPA
     R. E. Lane, LLC
     Certified Public Accountants
     203 E. Grandview Avenue
     Zelienople, PA 16063
     Phone: (724) 452-7772
     Fax: (724) 452-5410
     Email: mike@relane.com

               About Appalachian Lighting Systems

Founded in 2007, Appalachian Lighting Systems, Inc. --
http://www.alled.co/-- specializes in the development and  
manufacturing process of solid-state lighting (SSL). The company
makes solid-state lighting solutions for small and large area
outdoor/indoor applications including parking garage/lot,
street/area and high/low bay and much more. These fixtures are
engineered to deliver at least 150,000 hours of maintenance-free
operation and to provide 70 to 90 percent energy savings compared
to the traditional lights they replace. The company is based in
Ellwood City, PA, where it designs, engineers and manufactures its
product.

Appalachian Lighting Systems, Inc., based in Ellwood City, PA,
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 17-24454) on
Nov. 3, 2017.  In the petition signed by James J. Wassel,
president, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.  The Hon. Gregory L. Taddonio presides over
the case.  Robert O Lampl, Esq., at the Law Office of Robert Lampl,
serves as bankruptcy counsel.




ARCHER NORRIS: Taps BPM LLP as Financial Advisor
------------------------------------------------
Archer Norris, a Professional Law Corporation, seeks approval from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California
to hire BPM, LLP as its financial advisor.

The firm will assist the Debtor in preparing financial information
and bankruptcy reporting; prepare long-term financial and cash flow
projections; give advice regarding any potential cost reduction
opportunities; conduct financial and claims analysis; and provide
other financial advisory services related to its Chapter 11 case.

BPM will charge these hourly rates:

     Partner          Accounting/Tax/         
                      Consulting Services    $500 – $630
     Partner          SEC Services               $550
     Director         All Services            $350 – $495
     Manager          All Services            $330 – $410
     Supervisor       All Services            $240 – $315
     Senior           All Services                $210
     Associate II     All Services            $160 – $185
     Associate I      All Services            $125 – $155
     Bookkeeper       All Services            $120 - $140
     Administrative   Word Processing/         
                      Administrative Support   $65 – $105
     Intern           Miscellaneous             $30 – $80
     India Staff      Tax Services                $135

Jenise Gaskin, a partner at BPM, disclosed in a court filing that
the firm is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jenise Gaskin
     BPM LLP
     2001 North Main Street, Suite 360
     Walnut Creek, CA 94596
     Phone: 925.296.1016
     Email: JGaskin@bpmcpa.com

                       About Archer Norris

Archer Norris -- https://www.archernorris.com/ -- was a 70-lawyer
litigation firm with four offices located in Walnut Creek, San
Francisco, Newport Beach and Los Angeles.  As of its bankruptcy
filing, the firm had 60 non-lawyer employees.    

Archer Norris commenced a Chapter 11 case in conjunction with a
Plan of Dissolution designed, among other things, to facilitate the
wind-down of its operations and the smooth transition of client
matters to successor firms, with the goal being to minimize any
harm to the client matters, which is anticipated to maximize the
return to creditors.

Archer Norris sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case
No. 18-30924) on Aug. 22, 2018.  In the petition signed by Douglas
C. Strauss, president, the Debtor estimated total estimated assets
and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  The Debtor tapped
Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby & Pascuzzi LLP as its legal
counsel; and Russell Burbank, senior managing director of BPM LLP,
as its liquidating manager.


ARCHER NORRIS: Taps Diamond McCarthy LLP as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Archer Norris, a Professional Law Corporation, seeks approval from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California
to hire Diamond McCarthy LLP as its special professional
responsibility counsel.

Services required of Diamond McCarthy are:

     a. identify facts and circumstances on which potential
malpractice actions may be brought against the Debtor so that
timely reports can be sent to the Debtor's insurers;

     b. advise regarding the professional responsibilities of the
Debtor's attorneys to their clients under particular
circumstances;

     c. create a list of potential "orphan cases" in either motions
to withdraw as counsel, or another method of closing the matter
must be developed and implemented; and

     d. advise regarding the need to preserve client data, and the
transfer of client data to successor firms, and related
client-matter transition issues.  

Diamond McCarthy's standard hourly rates are:

     Christopher D. Sullivan, Partner        $650
     Lesley A. Hawes, Senior Counsel         $595
     Junior Partners                     $400 to $500
     Associates                          $235 to $350
     Paralegals                          $100 to $200

Christopher D. Sullivan, a partner with the law firm of Diamond
McCarthy LLP, attests that his firm is disinterested within the
meaning of 11 11 U.S.C. Section 101(14).

The firm can be reached through:

     Christopher D. Sullivan, Esq.
     Lesley Anne Hawes, Esq.
     Roxanne Bahadurji, Esq.
     DIAMOND MCCARTHY LLP
     150 California Street, Suite 2200
     San Francisco, CA 94111
     Phone: (415) 692-5200
     Fax: (415) 263-9200
     Email: csullivan@diamondmccarthy.com
            lhawes@diamondmccarthy.com
            rbahadurji@diamondmccarthy.com

                       About Archer Norris

Archer Norris -- https://www.archernorris.com/ -- was a 70-lawyer
litigation firm with four offices located in Walnut Creek, San
Francisco, Newport Beach and Los Angeles.  As of its bankruptcy
filing, the firm had 60 non-lawyer employees.    

Archer Norris commenced a Chapter 11 case in conjunction with a
Plan of Dissolution designed, among other things, to facilitate the
wind-down of its operations and the smooth transition of client
matters to successor firms, with the goal being to minimize any
harm to the client matters, which is anticipated to maximize the
return to creditors.

Archer Norris sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case
No. 18-30924) on Aug. 22, 2018.  In the petition signed by Douglas
C. Strauss, president, the Debtor estimated total estimated assets
and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Felderstein
Fitzgerald Willoughby & Pascuzzi LLP, led by name partner Thomas A.
Willoughby, is the Debtor's counsel.


ARCHER NORRIS: Taps Felderstein Fitzgerald as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Archer Norris, a Professional Law Corporation seeks approval from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California
to hire Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby & Pascuzzi LLP as its
legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the preparation of a bankruptcy plan;
give advice regarding the recovery of preferential payments and
fraudulent transfers; and provide other legal services related to
its Chapter 11 case.

Felderstein will charge these hourly rates:

     Steven Felderstein     Managing Partner     $625  
     Donald Fitzgerald      Partner              $515
     Thomas Willoughby      Partner              $495
     Paul Pascuzzi          Partner              $495
     Jason Rios             Partner              $425
     Jennifer Niemann       Counsel              $395  
     Holly Estioko          Associate            $350
     Karen Widder           Legal Assistant      $195

Thomas Willoughby, Esq., a partner at Felderstein, disclosed in a
court filing that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Thomas A. Willoughby, Esq.
     Jennifer E. Niemann, Esq.
     Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby & Pascuzzi LLP
     400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1750
     Sacramento, CA 95814
     Telephone: (916) 329-7400
     Facsimile: (916) 329-7435
     Email: twilloughby@ffwplaw.com
     Email: jniemann@ffwplaw.com

                       About Archer Norris

Archer Norris -- https://www.archernorris.com/ -- was a 70-lawyer
litigation firm with four offices located in Walnut Creek, San
Francisco, Newport Beach and Los Angeles.  As of its bankruptcy
filing, the firm had 60 non-lawyer employees.    

Archer Norris commenced a Chapter 11 case in conjunction with a
Plan of Dissolution designed, among other things, to facilitate the
wind-down of its operations and the smooth transition of client
matters to successor firms, with the goal being to minimize any
harm to the client matters, which is anticipated to maximize the
return to creditors.

Archer Norris sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case
No. 18-30924) on Aug. 22, 2018.  In the petition signed by Douglas
C. Strauss, president, the Debtor estimated total estimated assets
and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  The Debtor tapped
Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby & Pascuzzi LLP as its legal
counsel; and Russell Burbank, senior managing director of BPM LLP,
as its liquidating manager.


AUTO MASTERS: Hires Atwood & Mcvay, LLP, as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Auto Masters, LLC and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the
US Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Tennessee to hire
Atwood & Mcvay, LLP as special counsel.

Atwood & Mcvay charged Auto Masters a flat fee of $250 for handling
consumer cases, which included preparation and filing of a proof of
claim and either negotiating treatment in Chapter 13 cases or
obtaining a reaffirmation or stay relief in Chapter 7 cases. On
occasion, Atwood & Mcvay had charged additional fees for cases that
involved contested hearings.  In these situations, the firm billed
at a reduced hourly rate of $175 in addition to the flat $250 fee.


Atwood & Mcvay represents no interest adverse to the estate in the
matters engaged, as stated in the court filing.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Gregory R. Atwood, Esq.
     Atwood & Mcvay, LLP
     6953 Charlotte Pike, Suite 401
     Nashville, TN 37209
     Phone: (615) 354-1995
     Fax: (615) 866-5922
     Email: gregatwoodlaw@gmail.com

                        About Auto Masters

Auto Masters, LLC, is a used car dealer in TN with locations
serving the greater Nashville area.

Auto Masters, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
M.D. Tenn. Case No. 17-07036) on Oct. 17, 2017, listing $10,000,001
to $50 million in assets and $50,000,001 to $100 million in
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Charles M Walker.  R.
Alex Payne at Dunham Hildebrand, PLLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


BAYOU HAVEN: Court Junks BLA Bid for Relief from Automatic Stay
---------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Elizabeth W. Magner denies Bayou Liberty
Association, Inc.'s motion for relief from automatic stay in the
bankruptcy case captioned IN RE: BAYOU HAVEN BED & BREAKFAST, LLC,
Chapter 11, Debtor, Case No. 18-10570 (Bankr. E.D. La.).

BLA filed a Petition for Injunction and Preliminary Injunction on
February 9, 2018, in the Twenty Second Judicial District Court for
the Parish of St. Tammany seeking an injunction against Bayou Haven
holding events in violation of the St. Tammany Parish zoning
ordinance and the Deed Restriction ("State Suit").

On March 12, 2018 Bayou Haven filed Voluntary Petition for Relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, staying the State Suit.

Debtor admitted in Court that she was operating beyond what the
current zoning allows. For this reason, after the hearing on the
Motion, the Court issued an Order that Bayou Haven "is not
authorized to conduct any special events on its property in
violation of St. Tammany parish zoning ordinances.

BLA alleges that cause exists to grant relief from stay. The Court
holds that the State Suit involves only state issues. However,
judicial economy will not be promoted by allowing the State Suit to
go forward. The Court's order that Bayou Haven ceases all
activities in violation of the zoning ordinance is in itself
enforcement of the local zoning ordinance making any need to seek
injunctive relief duplicative. It would be a waste of the state
court's time and the limited resources of the estate for the State
Suit to proceed. The Court finds that the detriment to the estate
outweighs the hardship to BLA at this time. The denial will be
without prejudice.

A full-text copy of the Court's Decision dated August 15, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2oNcOws from Leagle.com.

Bayou Haven Bed & Breakfast, LLC, Debtor, represented by Wayne M.
Aufrecht -- wayne@northshorefirm.com  & Robin R. DeLeo.

Office of the U.S. Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Amanda
Burnette George, Office of the U.S. Trustee.

               About Bayou Haven Bed & Breakfast

Bayou Haven Bed and Breakfast, LLC --
http://www.bayouhavenslidell.com/-- is located on beautiful Bayou
Liberty in Slidell, Louisiana.  Bayou Haven is a newly built, seven
suite bed and breakfast designed to evoke the feel of a mid-1800s
bayou plantation house.  Every inch of the property was created to
exude the charm, comfort, and grace that is southern hospitality.

Bayou Haven Bed & Breakfast filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
E.D. La. Case No. 18-10570) on March 12, 2018, estimating under $1
million in assets and liabilities.  Robin R. DeLeo, Esq., at The De
Leo Law Firm LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.  Wayne M. Aufrecht, LLC,
is the Debtor's co-counsel.  Jeffrey D. Schoen, Esq., and Thomas H.
Huval, Esq., at Jones Fussell, LLP, serve as special counsel.


BEDFORD PROPERTIES: May Use Up To $142,000 in Cash Collateral
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. James J. Tancredi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Connecticut has entered a second interim order
authorizing Bedford Properties BEH Y LLC and debtor-affiliates to
use the rents on an interim basis, which rents the Debtors concede
is subject to the security interests of Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
and GREF Hartford LLC.

The cash collateral hearing is continued to Sept. 27, 2018 at 3:30
p.m.  

The Debtors are hereby authorized to use up to, but not in excess
of, $142,000 of cash collateral for the period of two months,
through and including Sept. 30, 2018, for only those expenses and
other items specifically identified in the Budgets. The Debtors may
use rents for maintaining the Properties, to meet all necessary
business expenses incurred in the ordinary course of their
business, including payment of court approved professional fees and
the U.S. Trustee's statutory fees, but only in the amounts and for
the purposes specifically identified in the Debtors' budgets.

Fees and expenses of the U.S. Trustee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section
1930 will be deemed to have a prior right to satisfaction from all
rents or other cash collateral generated post-petition and from all
other assets of the Debtors. The Debtors are prohibited from making
any payment on any loans (or any other obligations) from insiders
or officers.

Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC is the holder of a first security
interest in and to, among other things, the Properties and all of
the Debtors' rents, royalties, issues, license fees, profits,
revenue, income and other benefits of and generated by the
Properties and all leases and licenses of the Properties to secure
the debt owed to Bayview on the notes and mortgages. Bayview has an
overall allowed claim in the approximate amount of $2,600,000,
secured by the Properties.

GREF Hartford LLC is the holder of a second security interest in
and to, among other things, the Properties and all of the Debtors'
Rents, and all leases and licenses of the Properties to secure the
debt owed to GREF on the notes and mortgages. GREF has an overall
allowed claim in the approximate amount of $2,150,000, partially
secured by the Properties and partially unsecured.

In exchange for use of rents by the Debtors, and as adequate
protection for Bayview and GREF's interests therein:

     (i) the Debtors will make monthly adequate protection payments
to Bayview and GREF in the amounts set forth on the attached
budgets, commencing August 1, 2018, and

     (ii) Bayview and GREF are granted replacement liens as
provided in 11 U.S.C. Section 361(2) in all after-acquired Rents
(and any and all other income or proceeds) of the Debtors from its
Properties, and that said liens will be of equal extent and
priority to that which Bayview and GREF enjoyed with regard to the
Rents and the Properties at the time the Debtors filed their
Chapter 11 petitions.

A full-text copy of the Second Interim Order is available at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb18-21009-64.pdf

                     About Bedford Properties

Bedford Properties is the fee simple owner of five six-unit
residential apartment buildings in Hartford, Connecticut having a
total aggregate value of $1.05 million.

Bedford Properties BEH Y, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D. Conn. Case No. 18-21009) on June 19, 2018.  In the petition
signed by Yakov Stiel, member, the Debtor disclosed $1.07 million
in total assets and $4.61 million in total debt.  The Debtor is
represented by Gary J. Greene, Esq. of Greene Law, PC.


BJT GROUP: Oct. 23 Plan and Disclosure Statement Hearing
--------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Randal S. Mashburn issued an expedited order
conditionally approving BJT Group, Inc.'s disclosure statement
describing its chapter 11 plan.

Oct. 5, 2018 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the Disclosure Statement.

Oct. 5, 2018 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to confirmation of the Plan, and the last day
for filing written acceptances or rejections of the Plan.

The hearing on confirmation of the Plan and approval of the
Disclosure Statement will be held at 9:00 a.m. on Oct. 23, 2018 at
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Tennessee,
Courtroom Three, Second Floor, Customs House, 701 Broadway,
Nashville, Tennessee 37203.

General unsecured claims, classified in Class 4, are impaired.
Class 4 Claims total $517,030.  Holders of Class 4 Claims will be
paid $101 monthly for 10 years for a total payout of $12,120.

The Plan will be funded by income from the continued operations of
the tire sales and auto repair business.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement from PacerMonitor.com is
available at https://tinyurl.com/yasxg2xj at no charge.

                  About BJT Group Inc.

BJT Group, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 17-07504) on November
3, 2017.  Barry Poss, secretary and treasurer, signed the
petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets of less than $100,000 and estimated liabilities of
less than $1 million.

Judge Randal S. Mashburn presides over the case.  Lefkovitz &
Lefkovitz is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


BLACKSTONE DEVELOPERS: Creditors to Get 100% Payment Under Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
Blackstone Developers, LLC, submits a disclosure statement for its
plan of reorganization dated August 31, 2018.

The Debtor intends to fund the Plan through (a) funds on hand that
are available for such purpose on the "Effective Date," and (b)
proceeds to be received from post-confirmation "exit financing"
that Debtor has arranged to enable it to confirm and consummate
this Plan. Debtor believes that the treatment of Creditors in this
Plan will provide for payment to all of Debtor's secured and
unsecured creditors holding Allowed Claims of at least 100% of the
principal amount of such Allowed Claims. Accordingly, this Plan is
proposed to internally reorganize the Debtor's financial affairs
and to preserve and maximize the value of the Debtor's properties
for the benefit of all creditors possessing allowed claims and to
thereby provide the greatest potential recovery to all creditors.

During the period from the Confirmation Date through and until the
Effective Date, the Debtor shall continue to manage its properties
and financial affairs as a Debtor in Possession, or Reorganized
Debtor subject to the supervision of the Bankruptcy Court in
compliance with the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules, and all
orders of the Bankruptcy Court that are then in full force and
effect.

On the Effective Date, title to all of the Debtor's Property and
assets will vest in the Reorganized Debtor free and clear of all
Liens, claims, interests, security interests and other encumbrances
and without further order of the Bankruptcy Court except for Liens
that are expressly retained and preserved by this Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb18-31877-11-28.pdf

              About Blackstone Developers

Blackstone Developers, LLC, is a Texas limited liability company
maintaining its principal office at 917 Red Oak Creek Drive,
Ovilla, Texas.  It was organized in 2004 and has owned and operated
the shopping center that is its principal office for approximately
14 years.  Blackstone Developers owns and operates a shopping
center located at 205 South Main Street, Red Oak, Ellis County,
Texas 75154.

Blackstone Developers filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex.
Case No. 18-31877) on June 4, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Dorothy L. Shelly, manager, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and liabilities.  The Hon. Harlin DeWayne Hale
presides over the case.  The Law Offices of John P. Lewis, Jr., led
by founding partner John P. Lewis, serves as bankruptcy counsel to
the Debtor.


BROOKSTONE HOLDINGS: Committee Taps Bayard as Co-Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Brookstone
Holdings Corp. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware to hire Bayard, P.A.

Bayard will serve as co-counsel with Cooley LLP, the firm tapped by
the committee to be its lead counsel in connection with the Chapter
11 cases of Brookstone and its affiliates.

The firm's hourly rates range from $500 to $750 for directors and
counsel, $315 to $450 for associates, and $265 to $295 for
paraprofessionals.  The primary attorneys and paralegals who will
be providing the services are:

     Justin Alberto      Attorney     $525
     Erin Fay            Attorney     $500
     Daniel Brogan       Attorney     $450
     Gregory Flasser     Attorney     $375
     Sophie Macon        Law Clerk    $315
     Larry Morton        Paralegal    $295
     Erin Hendry         Paralegal    $265

Bayard is a "disinterested person" as defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases, Justin
Alberto, Esq., a director of Bayard, disclosed that his firm has
not agreed to a variation of its standard or customary billing
arrangements; and that no Bayard professional has varied his rate
based on the geographic location of the Debtors' cases.  

Mr. Alberto also disclosed that his firm has not represented the
committee prior to the petition date.

The Debtor has already approved the firm's prospective budget and
staffing plan for the period August 14 to November 30, 2018,
according to Mr. Alberto.

Bayard can be reached through:

     Justin R. Alberto, Esq.
     Erin R. Fay, Esq.
     Gregory J. Flasser, Esq.
     Bayard, P.A.
     600 N. King Street, Suite 400
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Telephone: (302) 655-5000
     Facsimile: (302) 658-6395
     Email: jalberto@bayardlaw.com
     Email: efay@bayardlaw.com
     Email: gflasser@bayardlaw.com

                     About Brookstone Holdings

Founded in 1965, Brookstone Holdings Corp. is a U.S.-based product
developer and retailer of wellness, entertainment, and travel
products that are fun to discover, smart to use and beautiful in
design.  Brookstone products are available at its 35 retail
locations in airports throughout the U.S., online at Brookstone.com
and through select premium retailers worldwide.

Brookstone Holdings and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
18-11780) on Aug. 2, 2018.  In the petitions signed by Stephen A.
Gould, secretary, the Debtors estimated assets of $50 million to
$100 million and liabilities of $100 million to $500 million.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon presides over the cases.

The Debtors tapped Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel; Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as Delaware counsel;
Berkeley Research Group, LLC as financial advisor; and GLC Advisors
& Co. as investment banker; Omni Management Group, Inc., as
administrative agent.

On August 14, 2018, the Office of the U.S. Trustee, appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee tapped
Cooley LLP as its lead counsel; Bayard, P.A. as co-counsel; and
Province, Inc., as financial advisor.


BROOKSTONE HOLDINGS: Committee Taps Cooley as Lead Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Brookstone
Holdings Corp. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware to hire Cooley LLP as its lead bankruptcy
counsel.

The firm will advise the committee regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; investigate pre-bankruptcy transactions in which
the company and its affiliates or insiders were involved; assist in
the Debtors' efforts to reorganize or sell their assets; assist the
committee in negotiations with the Debtors on their proposed
bankruptcy plan or exit strategy for their Chapter 11 cases; and
provide other legal services related to the cases.

Cooley will charge these hourly rates:

     Cathy Hershcopf     Partner       $1,120
     Seth Van Aalten     Partner         $940
     Robert Winning      Associate       $900
     Summer McKee        Associate       $710
     Evan Lazerowitz     Associate       $630
     Mollie Canby        Paralegal       $255

Seth Van Aalten, Esq., a partner at Cooley, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases, Mr. Van
Aalten disclosed that his firm has not agreed to a variation of its
standard or customary billing arrangements; and that no Cooley
professional has varied his rate based on the geographic location
of the Debtors' cases.  

Mr. Van Aalten also disclosed that his firm has not represented the
committee in the 12 months prior to the petition date.

The Debtor has already approved the firm's prospective budget and
staffing plan for the period August 14 to November 30, 2018,
according to Mr. Van Aalten.

Cooley can be reached through:

     Seth Van Aalten, Esq.
     Cathy Hershcopf, Esq.
     Robert Winning, Esq.
     Cooley LLP
     1114 Avenue of the Americas
     New York, NY 10036
     Telephone: (212) 479-6000
     Facsimile: (212) 479-6275
     E-mail: svanaalten@cooley.com
     E-mail: chershcopf@cooley.com
     E-mail: rwinning@cooley.com

                     About Brookstone Holdings

Founded in 1965, Brookstone Holdings Corp. is a U.S.-based product
developer and retailer of wellness, entertainment, and travel
products that are fun to discover, smart to use and beautiful in
design.  Brookstone products are available at its 35 retail
locations in airports throughout the U.S., online at Brookstone.com
and through select premium retailers worldwide.

Brookstone Holdings and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
18-11780) on Aug. 2, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Stephen A. Gould, secretary, the Debtors
estimated assets of $50 million to $100 million and liabilities of
$100 million to $500 million.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon presides over the cases.

The Debtors tapped Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel; Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as Delaware counsel;
Berkeley Research Group, LLC as financial advisor; and GLC Advisors
& Co. as investment banker; Omni Management Group, Inc., as
administrative agent.

On Aug. 14, 2018, the Office of the U.S. Trustee, appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee tapped
Cooley LLP as its lead counsel; Bayard, P.A. as co-counsel; and
Province, Inc. as financial advisor.


BROOKSTONE HOLDINGS: Committee Taps Province as Financial Advisor
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Brookstone
Holdings Corp. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware to hire Province, Inc., as its financial
advisor.

The firm will represent the committee in negotiations with the
company and its affiliates and lenders; review the Debtors'
financial reports; advise the committee on the current state of the
Debtors' sale process or their restructuring plan; assist the
committee in formulating and implementing its own restructuring
plan; and provide other legal services related to the Debtors'
Chapter 11 cases.

Province will charge these hourly rates:

     Principal             $790 - $835
     Managing Director     $620 - $685
     Senior Director       $570 - $610
     Director              $480 - $560
     Sr. Associate         $395 - $475
     Associate             $350 - $390
     Analyst               $285 - $345
     Para professional            $150

Sanjuro Kietlinski, senior director of Province, disclosed in a
court filing that the firm and its employees do not have any
connection with the Debtors and their creditors.

The firm can be reached through:

     Sanjuro Kietlinski
     Province, Inc.
     1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 222
     Plantation, FL 33324  
     Phone: 702-685-5555
     Fax: 702.685.5556
     Email: info@provincefirm.com   

                     About Brookstone Holdings

Founded in 1965, Brookstone Holdings Corp. is a U.S.-based product
developer and retailer of wellness, entertainment, and travel
products that are fun to discover, smart to use and beautiful in
design.  Brookstone products are available at its 35 retail
locations in airports throughout the U.S., online at Brookstone.com
and through select premium retailers worldwide.

Brookstone Holdings and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
18-11780) on Aug. 2, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Stephen A. Gould, secretary, the Debtors
estimated assets of $50 million to $100 million and liabilities of
$100 million to $500 million.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon presides over the cases.

The Debtors tapped Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel; Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as Delaware counsel;
Berkeley Research Group, LLC as financial advisor; and GLC Advisors
& Co. as investment banker; Omni Management Group, Inc., as
administrative agent.

On Aug. 14, 2018, the Office of the U.S. Trustee, appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee tapped
Cooley LLP as its lead counsel; Bayard, P.A. as co-counsel; and
Province, Inc. as financial advisor.


BROWARD COLLISION: Trustee Taps KapilaMukamal as Accountant
-----------------------------------------------------------
Soneet Kapila, the Chapter 11 trustee for Broward Collision, Inc.,
received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida to hire his own firm KapilaMukamal as his
accountant.

KapilaMukamal will review all financial information prepared by the
Debtor; review pre-bankruptcy and post-petition transfers; review
books and records; prepare tax returns; and provide other
accounting services.

Mr. Kapila, a partner at KapilaMukamal, disclosed in a court filing
that his firm will not represent any other entity that holds an
adverse interest in the Debtor's case.

The firm can be reached through:

     Soneet R. Kapila
     KapilaMukamal, Certified Public Accountants
     1000 South Federal Highway, Suite 200
     Kapila Building
     Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316
     Office: 954-761-1011
     Direct: 954-712-3201
     E-mail: kapila@kapilamukamal.com
     E-mail: km@kapilamukamal.com

                     About Broward Collision

Broward Collision, Inc., is one of the largest established
independent facilities located in Sunrise serving West Broward.
Broward Collision is a strong, solid name in the industry offering
one of the largest licensed and certified collision repair
facilities in West Sunrise.

Broward Collision filed, pro se, a voluntary petition under chapter
11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-17492)
on June 22, 2018, estimating under $1 million in assets and
liabilities.  The Debtor later tapped Rachamin "Rocky" Cohen, Esq.,
at Cohen Legal Services, PA, as its counsel.

Soneet Kapila, Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor, tapped Furr
Cohen, P.A. as his attorney.


BSC HOLDINGS: Taps Thompson Burton PLLC as Special Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
BSC Holdings, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Tennessee to hire Phillip G. Young, Jr.,
and the firm of Thompson Burton PLLC as special counsel to
represent it in pursuing litigation against any and all liable
parties regarding the eviction of the Debtor from real property
located in Williamson County, Tennessee, and the destruction of the
Debtor's property as part of those eviction proceedings.

Mr. Young and the firm of Thompson Burton PLLC shall be paid on a
contingency basis, to receive 40% of the amount recovery, plus
reimbursement of reasonable costs.

Phillip G. Young, Jr., associate with the firm of Thompson Burton
PLLC, attests that he and his firm have no adverse interests to the
Debtor-in-possession or the bankruptcy estate or any creditors or
parties-in-interest and their respective attorneys in any matter to
which they would be engaged.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Phillip G. Young, Jr.
     Thompson Burton PLLC
     One Franklin Park
     6100 Tower Circle, SUite 200
     Franklin, TN 37067
     Phone: 615-465-6008
     Email: phillip@thompsonbuton.com

                       About BSC Holdings

On July 13, 2018, BSC Holdings, LLC, filed a petition for relief
under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code which was subsequently
converted to a Chapter 11 proceeding on August 23, 2018 (Bankr.
M.D. Tenn. Case no. 18-04636). At the time of filing, the Debtor
estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $0 to $50,000 in
liabilities.  Alexander S Koval at Rothschild & Ausbrooks, PLLC, is
the Debtor's counsel.


CAMBER ENERGY: Provides an Update on Recent Workover Activities
---------------------------------------------------------------
Since closing the Panhandle acquisition in Hutchinson County,
Texas, Camber Energy, Inc. has worked over thirty-one wells, which
includes two salt water disposal wells and twenty-nine potential
producers.  Twenty-nine wells have been restored to production and
are currently conducting flow-rate test.  Additionally, the Company
has another nineteen wells to workover, funding permitting.

These activities are all consistent with the Company's previously
announced growth plans.

The Company is also evaluating additional opportunities close to
its Panhandle assets.

The Company is also continuing to work towards closing its
previously announced sale transaction with N&B Energy, LLC, which
is anticipated to close within the next three weeks.  As noted
previously, if the transaction closes, N&B will assume all of
Camber's approximately $37 million of senior secured debt with
International Bank of Commerce, or alternatively, if Camber
transfers its assets to IBC, the Company will be granted a novation
from the obligation to satisfy all of its debt owed to IBC.  This
will significantly improve the Company's balance sheet with the
satisfaction of debt and sale/transfer of substantially depreciated
assets and improve cash flow with the elimination of monthly debt
service obligations of approximately $450,000 related to those
assets.

                      About Camber Energy

Based in San Antonio, Texas, Camber Energy, Inc. (NYSE American:
CEI) -- http://www.camber.energy/-- is an independent oil and gas
company engaged in the development of crude oil, natural gas and
natural gas liquids in the Hunton formation in Central Oklahoma in
addition to anticipated project development in the Texas
Panhandle.

Camber Energy reported a net loss of $24.77 million for the year
ended March 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $89.12 million for
the year ended March 31, 2017.  As of June 30, 2018, the Company
had $14.72 million in total assets, $42.85 million in total
liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of $28.13 million.

GBH CPAs, PC's audit opinion included in the company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2018 contains a
going concern explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has
significant losses from operations and had a working capital
deficit as of March 31, 2018.  These factors raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


CAMERON WOODS: Taps McCallar Law Firm as Counsel
------------------------------------------------
Cameron Woods, LLC, is awaiting permission from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Savannah
Division, to employ C. James McCallar, Jr. and Tiffany E. Caron of
McCallar Law firm as its counsel.

A hearing on the employment application was originally scheduled
for August 28 but has been rescheduled to October 23.

The Debtor requires counsel to provide general representation of
the Debtor and perform all legal services for the Debtor as may be
necessary.

The attorneys at McCallar Law firm will be paid at these hourly
rates:

     C. James McCallar, Jr.     $400
     Tiffany E. Caron           $300

McCallar Law Firm attests that it has no interest adverse to the
Debtor or its estate, and its employment would be in the best
interest of the estate.

McCallar Law Firm can be reached at:

     C. James McCallar, Jr., Esq.
     Tiffany E. Caron, Esq.
     McCALLAR LAW FIRM
     P.O. Box 9026
     Savannah, GA 31412
     (912) 234-1215

Cameron Woods, LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. S.D. Ga.  Case No. 18-40927) on July 3, 2018, listing under
$50,000 in assets and $50,001 to $100,000 in liabilities.  The Hon.
Edward J. Coleman III oversees the case.

The United States Trustee has advised the Court it was unable to
appoint an official creditors' committee.



CARVANA CO: Moody's Gives B3 CFR & Rates $300MM Unsec. Notes Caa2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. assigned a first time B3 Corporate
Family Rating to Carvana Co. and a Caa2 rating was assigned to the
company's proposed $300 million senior unsecured notes issue. A
SGL-4 speculative grade liquidity rating was also assigned. The
outlook is stable.

Assignments:

Issuer: Carvana Co.

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B3-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Assigned SGL-4

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B3

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assignd Caa2 (LGD5)

"Carvana's unique online used car retail model is in its early
stages, with no profits as of yet, however Moody's feels that
performance thus far reflects a certain level of resonance with the
used car buying public, with the potential for quarterly
profitability within the next two years, and results from early
entered markets encouraging on that front," stated Moody's Vice
President Charlie O'Shea. "This is a very fragmented segment with
annual volume of around 40 million units in the US representing
multiples of new car sales, with growth potential for Carvana
readily evident," continued O'Shea. "Liquidity suffers from
short-term financing commitments, though Moody's expects
longer-term arrangements will be obtained in due course."

RATINGS RATIONALE

Carvana's credit profile is weak driven by its lack of
profitability for the next couple of years as the business scales,
its weak liquidity, favorable position in the used car retail
segment, its unique ordering and delivery models, which Moody's
believes provide a first-mover advantage, and significant
management expertise in both the auto and tech segments, with
critical support from its Board of Directors also a factor. The
stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that Carvana's
quantitative profile will improve sequentially as the business
scales. Given the lack of profitability, an upgrade in the
short-term is unlikely. Over time, upward momentum would generate
once EBITDA turns positive with at least adequate liquidity.
Ratings could be downgraded if operating performance levels do not
continue to progress such that profitability on a quarterly basis
during 2020 is unlikely, or if liquidity weakens.

The Caa2 rating on the proposed $300 million senior unsecured notes
reflects their junior position in the capital structure, and
follows application of Moody's Loss Given Default methodology. The
SGL-4 speculative grade liquidity rating, representing weak
liquidity, reflects the lack of long-term funding combined with the
projected lack of profitability and continuing cash burn.

Headquartered in Tempe, Arizona, Carvana is an online used car
retailer with LTM revenues of slightly over $1.3 billion.


CARVANA CO: S&P Assigns CCC+ Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'CCC+' issuer credit rating to
Phoenix-based online used-vehicle retailer Carvana Co. The outlook
is stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned our 'CCC+' issue-level
rating and '3' recovery rating to the company's proposed $300
million senior unsecured notes due in 2023. The '3' recovery rating
indicates our expectation that debtholders would realize meaningful
(50%-70%; rounded estimate: 60%) recovery in the event of a payment
default.

"Our ratings on Carvana reflect the company's negative EBITDA,
highly negative free cash flow, and limited operating history to
demonstrate if its financial commitments are sustainable,
especially while managing rapid growth.

"The stable outlook on Carvana reflects our view that while the
company should continue to increase revenues and profit, it will
not generate positive EBITDA over the next 12 months. We expect
that free cash flow will continue to be negative but liquidity will
be adequate in the near-term to meet the company's aggressive
growth plans. This would include at least $200 million cash on its
balance sheet.

"We could raise our ratings if the company generates positive
EBITDA, with a path to generating free cash flow after adjusting
for growth capex. This could occur if the company increases GPU
near $3,000 and attains sufficient scale such that its marketing is
more efficient on a national scale. This would imply that the
company's financial commitments are more sustainable.

"Though unlikely over the next 12 months, we could lower our
ratings if the company cannot expand fast enough to reach the scale
needed to generate positive EBITDA, and eventually positive free
cash flow, should the company scale back growth initiatives. This
could be caused by a failure of its online business model to
attract sufficient customers in new markets, increased competition,
or a failure to improve its inventory turns or reduce vehicle
acquisition costs. Its standing in the credit and equity markets
would also need to fall such that it would be unlikely the company
could continue to finance its aggressive growth and maintain
negative free cash flow."  



CIRCULATORY CENTERS: Trustee Taps Bernstein as Special Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Natalie Lutz Cardiello, the Chapter 11 trustee for Circulatory
Centers of America, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to hire
Bernstein-Burkley, PC, as special counsel.

The firm will assist the trustee in pursuing various Chapter 5
claims, including preference claims, which are among the assets of
the Debtor's bankruptcy estate.

Bernstein will collect a contingency fee of 25% of the recovery on
any avoidance action assigned to the firm after Sept. 4 and before
any lawsuit or adversary proceeding is filed.  

If an adversary proceeding or other legal action is filed, the
contingency fee percentage will increase to 40% of the recovery.
Bernstein has to consult with the trustee and obtain authority
prior to filing any adversary proceeding.  The Debtor's estate will
advance or reimburse costs and out-of-pocket expenses.

If an avoidance action results in the elimination of a secured
claim or priority claim while not producing an affirmative recovery
from which a contingent fee should be paid, Bernstein may seek
compensation by application based on the benefit to the estate.
The firm has to discuss any such application with the trustee prior
to filing.  

If the right to a contingent fee is not disputed by the trustee,
the fee may be paid by the trustee upon the estate's receipt of the
recovery amount without the need for a fee application or further
court order.

Kirk Burkley, Esq., at Bernstein-Burkley, disclosed in a court
filing that he neither represents nor holds any interest adverse to
the Debtor and its estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Kirk B. Burkley, Esq.
     Bernstein-Burkley, PC
     707 Grant Street, Suite 2200
     Gulf Tower
     Pittsburgh, PA 15219
     Phone: 412-456-8108 / 412-456-8100
     E-mail: kburkley@bernsteinlaw.com
     E-mail: info@bernsteinlaw.com

                    About Circulatory Centers

Headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Circulatory Centers,
P.C. and its affiliates -- http://www.veinhealth.com/-- provide
varicose vein and spider vein treatment.  Circulatory Centers of
America, LLC, provides administrative assistance for its operating
affiliates.

Circulatory Centers, P.C., Circulatory Centers of America, LLC,
Circulatory Centers of Ohio, Inc., and Circulatory Center of
Pennsylvania, Inc. simultaneously filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 17-22571, 17-22572, 17-22575,
and 17-22576, respectively) on June 23, 2017.  A related entity,
Circulatory Center of West Virginia, Inc., sought bankruptcy
protection on Jan. 20, 2017 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 17-20211).
The cases are jointly administered under Case No.  17-22572.

Judge Gregory L. Taddonio presides over the cases.  Robert O Lampl,
Esq., at Robert O Lampl, Attorney At Law, serves as the Debtors'
bankruptcy counsel.

The Debtors each estimated assets at between $100,000 and $500,000
and liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million.

Natalie Lutz Cardiello was appointed Chapter 11 trustee for the
Debtors.


CK ASSISTED: Plan Outline OK'd; Nov. 1 Plan Confirmation Hearing
----------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Daniel P. Collins issued an order approving CK
Assisted Living of Arizona, LLC's first amended disclosure
statement in support of its first amended plan of reorganization.

The Court will consider whether to confirm the Plan at a hearing on
Nov. 1, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. The Confirmation Hearing will be held
in Courtroom No 603, 6th Floor, 230 North First Avenue, Phoenix,
Arizona.

Any party desiring to object to confirmation of the Plan must file
a written objection by  Oct. 25, 2018.

           About CK Assisted Living of Arizona

CK Assisted Living of Arizona, LLC, sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 18-01882) on
Feb. 28, 2018.  The petition was signed by Steven Walski, manager.
At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$1 million and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge Daniel P.
Collins presides over the case. Carmichael & Powell, P.C., is the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of CK Assisted Living of Arizona LLC as of
March 26, according to a court docket.


CLICKAWAY CORP: Taps BPM LLP as Financial Consultant
----------------------------------------------------
Clickaway Corporation seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of California to hire BPM, LLP as its
financial consultant.

The firm will provide accounting assistance for the Debtor to
compile data for reporting, including the preparation of required
monthly operating reports.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

     Partner               $500 - $630
     Director              $350 - $495
     Manager               $330 - $410
     Supervisor            $240 - $315
     Senior                    $210
     Associates I and II   $125 - $185
     Bookkeeper            $120 - $140

Edward Webb, a partner at BPM, disclosed in a court filing that his
firm neither holds nor represents any interest adverse to the
Debtor and its bankruptcy estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Edward S. Webb
     BPM, LLP
     60 South Market Street, Suite 800
     San Jose, CA 95113
     Phone: (408) 961-6300
     Fax: (408) 961-6324
     E-mail: bpm@bpmcpa.com

                    About Clickaway Corporation

Clickaway Corporation, a computer repair, service, sales and
networking company, has been headquartered in Campbell and serving
more than 50,000 customers in Bay Area since 2002.  Clickaway filed
a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No.
18-51662) on July 27, 2018, estimating $1 million to $10 million in
assets and liabilities.  The Law Offices of Binder and Malter, led
by its partner Michael W. Malter, serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.


CLICKAWAY CORP: Taps Wendel Rosen as Special Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
Clickaway Corporation seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of California to retain Wendel Rosen
Black & Dean LLP as special counsel.

The firm will continue to represent the Debtor in a lawsuit styled
as Scott Johnson v. Elva June Gould, as trustee of the Gould Family
Trust, Clickaway Corporation (Case No. 18-02059.  The case, which
was brought under the federal Americans ADA, is pending before the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Wendel Rosen charges these hourly rates:

     David Goldman            $525
     Associates           $325 to $385
     Paralegals               $200

The Debtor paid the firm a retainer in the sum of $4,500.

David Goldman, Esq., a partner at Wendel Rosen, disclosed in a
court filing that his firm neither holds nor represents any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its bankruptcy estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     David Goldman, Esq.
     Wendel Rosen Black & Dean LLP
     1111 Broadway, 24th Floor
     Oakland, CA 94607-4036
     Tel: 510-834-6600
     Fax: 510-808-4658
     Email: dgoldman@wendel.com

                    About Clickaway Corporation

Clickaway Corporation, a computer repair, service, sales and
networking company, has been headquartered in Campbell and serving
more than 50,000 customers in Bay Area since 2002.  Clickaway filed
a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No.
18-51662) on July 27, 2018, estimating $1 million to $10 million in
assets and liabilities.

The Debtor tapped The Law Offices of Binder and Malter as its
bankruptcy counsel; Willoughby Stuart Bening & Cook as special
counsel; and Crawford Pimentel Corporation as accountant.


CM RESORT: Ct. Abates Appeal Pending Resolution of Bankruptcy Case
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Court of Appeals of Texas abates the appeals case captioned
DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, INC. ET AL., Appellants, v.
SUZANN RUFF, Appellee, No. 11-18-00034-CV (Tex. App.).

Destination Development Partners, Inc., and several related
entities, including CM Resort LLC, filed an appeal from a portion
of an interlocutory order signed by the trial court on Jan. 30,
2018. On August 15, 2018, CM Resort filed a petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, the Court
abates the appeal. The parties are requested to inform the court of
the resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings or any other event
that would allow the appeal to be reinstated.

A copy of the Court's Order is available at https://bit.ly/2oZ4ha4
from Leagle.com.

Jeffrey Wallace Hellberg, Junior , Rusty J. O'Kane , for 7R Owners
Association, Inc., Clayton Mountain Development, LLC, CM Resort,
LLC, Sundance Residents, LLC, CM Resort Management LLC, Sundance
Partners, LLC, Specfac Group, LLC, Destination Development
Partners, Inc., Destination Development Community III, Ltd. f/k/a
Icarus, Investments IV, Ltd., Sundance Residence Club, LLC and
Sundance Lodge, LLC, Appellants.

D. Bradley Kizzia -- bkizzia@kjpllc.com -- Anh V. Tran, Mark M.
Donheiser, Gary C. Crapster -- gcc@steidley-neal.com -- Randal
Mathis, for Suzann Ruff, Appellee.

Based in Gordon, Texas, CM Resort LLC describes its business as a
single asset real estate.

CM Resort filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Case No. 18-43168) on August 15, 2018, with estimated assets
at $1 million to $10 million and estimated liabilities at $10
million to $50 million. The petition was signed by Mark Ruff,
member and authorized agent.


COLOR SPOT: WNL, et al., Bid for Limited Stay Pending Appeal Nixed
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned WINTERS NURSERY LLC, FOREST GROVE
NURSERY LLC, WINTERS FOREST GROVE LLC, BLOOMING FARM, INC., and
FALLBROOK NURSERY LLC, Appellants, v. COLOR SPOT HOLDINGS, INC., et
al., Appellees, Civ. No. 18-1246 (UNA) (D. Del.), Appellants seek
entry of an order granting a limited stay pending appeal of the
Bankruptcy Court's order, dated August 10, 2018, which, inter alia,
approved the Debtors' assumption and assignment of certain leases
to winning bidder and designated purchaser TreeSap Farms, LLC as
part of a sale of substantially all of the Debtors' assets.

After a careful analysis of the arguments presented, District Judge
Richard G. Andrews denies the emergency motion.

Appellant bears the burden of proving that a stay of the
Confirmation Order is warranted based on the following criteria:
(1) whether the movant has made "a strong showing" that it is
likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the movant will be
irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether a stay will
substantially injure other interested parties; and (4) where the
public interest lies. The most critical factors, according to the
Supreme Court, are the first two: whether the stay movant has
demonstrated (1) a strong showing of the likelihood of success, and
(2) that it will suffer irreparable harm -- the latter referring to
harm that cannot be prevented or fully rectified by a successful
appeal.

As to the first factor, Appellants have not met their burden of
making "a strong showing" that they are likely to succeed on the
merits.

Appellants are unlikely to succeed on their" appeal of the
Bankruptcy Court's adequate assurance ruling for several reasons.
The Bankruptcy Court determined that TreeSap's financial
information was "factual evidence not in dispute; rather each party
emphasizes different financial facts and has a different take on
how [the Bankruptcy Court] should view the information provided."
Here, the Emergency Motion rehashes the same arguments considered
and rejected by the Bankruptcy Court based on the same evidence,
and, as Debtors point out, Appellants make no effort to identify
any specific errors that exist in the August 10, 2018 ruling.
Appellants offer no further analysis, no suggestion that the
Bankruptcy Court misapprehended the evidence proffered, and no
critique or suggestion that the Bankruptcy Court employed an
improper legal standard in evaluating and analyzing the facts.
Merely repeating these rejected arguments does not meet the
"substantial" burden Appellants have to show a likelihood of
success on the merits of their appeal. On the "better than
negligible but not greater than 50%" scale that the Revel court
adopted, Appellants do not make a "better than negligible" showing
of any likelihood that the Bankruptcy Court's prior ruling should
be disturbed.

Appellants have also failed to establish that they would suffer
irreparable harm in the absence of a stay.

Section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that a challenge to
a sale is mooted if "the underlying sale or lease was not stayed
pending the appeal, and []the court, if reversing or modifying the
authorization to sell or lease, would be affecting the validity of
such a sale or lease."  While Appellants reserve their right to
argue that validity of the sale would not be affected by reversal
-- and thus statutory mootness may not even apply -- Appellants
also rely mainly on the possibility of statutory mootness as
irreparable harm justifying a stay. However, the possibility that
an appeal may become moot does not alone constitute irreparable
harm for purposes of obtaining a stay. Even taken with the other
arguments raised, Appellants' burden is not met.

Having evaluated Appellants' likelihood of success on the merits
and risk of irreparable harm absent a stay, and having determined
that Appellants have failed to carry their burden as to either
element, the Court is satisfied no further analysis is required.
The emergency motion is, therefore, denied.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Order dated August 21,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2NyOAE6 from Leagle.com.

Winters Nursery LLC, Forest Grove Nursery LLC, Winters Forest Grove
LLC, Blooming Farm, Inc. & Fallbrook Nursery LLC, Collectively, the
"NHHC II Landlords", Appellants, represented by Seth Andrew
Niederman -- sniederman@foxrothschild.com -- Fox Rothschild LLP &
Carl Douglas Neff -- cneff@foxrothschild.com -- Fox Rothschild
LLP.

Color Spot Holdings, Inc., Appellee, represented by M. Blake Cleary
-- mbcleary@ycst.com -- Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP,
Jaime Luton Chapman -- jchapman@ycst.com -- Young, Conaway,
Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Ryan M. Bartley -- rbartley@ycst,com --
Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP & Sean T. Greecher  --
sgreecher@ycst.com --Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP.

TreeSap Farms, LLC & TSH Opco, LLC, Appellees, represented by
Timothy P. Cairns --  tcairns@pszjlaw.com -- Pachulski, Stang,
Ziehl & Jones, LLP.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellee, represented by John Henry Knight
-- knight@rlf.com -- Richards, Layton & Finger, PA.

                     About Color Spot

Color Spot Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, owns and
operates nurseries.  It was incorporated in 2007 and is based in
Fallbrook, California.

Color Spot Holdings and its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 18-11272) on May 29, 2018.  In the
petitions signed by CEO Paul Russo, the Debtors estimated $50
million to $100 million in assets and $100 million to $500 million
in liabilities.

Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein presides over the Debtors' cases.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP as their
counsel; Raymond James & Associates, Inc., as investment banker;
and Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, Inc., as claims and noticing agent
and administrative services advisor.


CONCORDIA INTERNATIONAL: Provides Update on Recapitalization
------------------------------------------------------------
At the request of market regulators, Concordia International Corp.
announced that as part of the Company's recently completed
recapitalization transaction, the Company completed on Sept. 6,
2018, a US$586.5 million private placement for new equity at a
price of US$13.69 per limited voting share, as also described in
the Company's management information circular dated May 15, 2018.

Concordia currently has 48,913,504 limited voting shares issued and
outstanding, which commenced trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange,
Sept. 11, 2018, under the symbols CXR (in Canadian dollars) and
CXR.U (in US dollars).

The equity components of the Recapitalization Transaction completed
on Sept. 6, 2018, consisted of:

   * US$586.5 million in cash invested pursuant to a private
     placement by certain parties that executed a subscription
     agreement with Concordia, dated May 1, 2018, in exchange for
     new limited voting shares of Concordia representing in the
     aggregate approximately 87.69% of the outstanding limited
     voting shares of Concordia upon implementation of the
     Recapitalization Transaction;

   * the Company's unsecured debt in the aggregate principal
     amount of approximately US$1.6 billion, plus accrued and
     unpaid interest, was exchanged for new limited voting shares
     of Concordia representing in the aggregate approximately
     11.96% of the outstanding limited voting shares of Concordia
     upon implementation of the Recapitalization Transaction; and

   * the Company's previous common shareholders retained their
     common shares, subject to a 1-for-300 common share
     consolidation and re-designated as limited voting shares, and

     representing approximately 0.35% of the outstanding limited
     voting shares upon implementation of the Recapitalization
     Transaction.

                       About Concordia

Based in Ontario, Canada, Concordia -- http://www.concordiarx.com/
-- is an international specialty pharmaceutical company with a
diversified portfolio of more than 200 patented and off-patent
products, and sales in more than 90 countries.  Going forward, the
Company is focused on becoming a leader in European specialty,
off-patent medicines.  Concordia operates out of facilities in
Mississauga, Ontario and, through its subsidiaries, operates out of
facilities in Bridgetown, Barbados; London, England and Mumbai,
India.

Concordia reported a net loss of US$1.59 billion for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of US$1.31 billion for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Concordia had
US$2.12 billion in total assets, US$4.25 billion in total
liabilities and a total shareholders' deficit of US$2.13 billion.


CONGOLEUM CORP: Court Rejects BIW's Bid to Dismiss Complaint
------------------------------------------------------------
Defendant Bath Iron Works Corporation in the case captioned DVL,
INC. and DVL KEARNY HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. CONGOLEUM
CORPORATION and BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION, Defendants, Civ. No.
17-4261 (KM) (JBC) (D.N.J.) has moved to dismiss the amended
complaint of the plaintiffs, DVL, Inc. and DVL Kearny Holdings, LLC
and the third-party complaint of defendant Congoleum Corporation.
Upon review of the case, District Judge Kevin McNulty denies BIW's
motion to dismiss.

The claims made against BIW by DVL and Congoleum concern a piece of
property in Kearny, New Jersey. That property, over the course of a
century and a half, was allegedly subject to serious environmental
damage that was recently remediated at a cost of millions of
dollars. Earlier, Congoleum had participated in bankruptcy
proceedings in which it settled asbestos-related personal injury
claims. Based on that settlement in bankruptcy, BIW seeks dismissal
of the claims against it on various grounds.

Two of its grounds relate to Congoleum alone, and one relates to
both DVL and Congoleum. First, BIW argues that judicial estoppel
bars Congoleum's claims, because Congoleum is contradicting a
position it took in the prior bankruptcy case. Second, it argues
that res judicata bars DVL's claims in the amended complaint and
BIW's cross-claims because the bankruptcy court entered a final
order with preclusive effect. Third, it argues that equitable
estoppel prevents Congoleum from pursuing these claims because BIW
relied to its detriment on Congoleum's stated legal position in the
bankruptcy case.

BIW states that Congoleum has engaged in "estoppel worthy conduct"
that goes beyond a "mere inconsistency." It has not, however, put
forward sufficient evidence of such bad faith. Without prejudging
the matter, the Court notes that Congoleum has made a reasonable
argument that it has not in fact taken inconsistent positions.
Congoleum's reference to "any of the liabilities of the Congoleum
Flooring Business" cannot be divorced from its context, which was
the adjustment of asbestos-related personal liability claims, and
insurance coverage therefor, in the bankruptcy. On this motion to
dismiss, the Court cannot indulge an assumption that Congoleum, in
bad faith, was dangling the appearance (but not the reality) of
full exculpation in order to bring about the confirmation of the
plan in bankruptcy.

Judicial estoppel is an extreme remedy. The Court cannot conclude
as a matter of law that Congoleum has engaged in bad faith that
would be "tantamount to a knowing misrepresentation or even fraud
on the Court." The motion to dismiss Congoleum's claims on those
grounds is denied.

Res judicata, or claim preclusion, bars a party from pursuing a
second suit against the same adversary based on the same cause of
action. The context of the confirmation order suggests that res
judicata does not apply to the claims made by DVL and Congoleum. At
any rate, the Court cannot find that res judicata applies in the
context of a motion to dismiss. The motion to dismiss on res
judicata grounds is therefore denied.

Finally, BIW alleges that Congoleum represented to BIW and the
court that BIW had no liability of any kind for the Congoleum
flooring operations when it sought to obtain approval of the
settlement in the bankruptcy proceeding. BIW states that it
reasonably relied on this representation that it would not later be
held responsible for liabilities that otherwise might have been
covered by the settled insurance policies. Once again, for the
reasons stated above, the alleged representation presents issues of
factual interpretation, not suitable for resolution on a motion to
dismiss.

As BIW sees it, the evidence of the misrepresentations "appears in
a nice, neat package" consisting of a declaration by Congoleum's
Chief Financial Officer, the Bankruptcy Court's Order approving the
settlement, and the Confirmation Order. For the reasons expressed
above, these documents may properly considered on a motion to
dismiss for the fact that they were filed, and any effects that may
flow from that filing as a matter of law.  They cannot be accepted
on a motion to dismiss, however, as factual proof that Congoleum
made a misrepresentation, or that BIW reasonably relied on it to
its detriment. The motion to dismiss, insofar as it is based on
equitable estoppel, is therefore denied.

For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies BIW's motion to dismiss
DVL's and Congoleum's claims and denies as moot Congoleum's motion
to file a surreply.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion dated August 23, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2oZGNS8 from Leagle.com.

DVL, INC. & DVL KEARNY HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiffs, represented by
DYLAN F. HENRY -- dfhenry@zarwin.com Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan,
Schaer & Toddy, P.C., PAUL MARTIN SCHMIDT --
pschmidt@postschell.com -- POST & SCHELL, P.C. & EITAN DANIEL BLANC
-- edblanc@zarwin.com -- ZARWIN BAUM DEVITO, KAPLAN, SCHAER & TODDY
P.C.

CONGOLEUM CORPORATION, Defendant, represented by CAMILLE V.
OTERO-PHILLIPS -- cotero@gibbonslaw.com --  Gibbons PC, KEVIN W.
WEBER -- kweber@gibbonslaw.com -- GIBBONS PC, SHAWN M. LATOURETTE
-- slatourette@gibbonslaw.com -- GIBBONS P.C. &WILLIAM S. HATFIELD
-- whatfield@gibbonslaw.com -- Gibbons P.C.

CONGOLEUM CORPORATION, Third Party Plaintiff, represented by
CAMILLE V. OTERO-PHILLIPS , Gibbons PC, SHAWN M. LATOURETTE ,
GIBBONS P.C. & WILLIAM S. HATFIELD , Gibbons P.C.

CONGOLEUM CORPORATION, Counter Claimant, represented by CAMILLE V.
OTERO-PHILLIPS , Gibbons PC, SHAWN M. LATOURETTE , GIBBONS P.C. &
WILLIAM S. HATFIELD , Gibbons P.C.

DVL KEARNY HOLDINGS, LLC & DVL, INC., Counter Defendants,
represented by PAUL MARTIN SCHMIDT , POST & SCHELL, P.C. & EITAN
DANIEL BLANC , ZARWIN BAUM DEVITO, KAPLAN, SCHAER & TODDY P.C.

              About Congoleum Corporation

Based in Mercerville, New Jersey, Congoleum Corporation --
http://www.congoleum.com/-- manufactures resilient sheet and tile
and plank flooring products available in a wide variety of product
features, designs and colors.

The Company filed for Chapter 11 protection on Dec. 31, 2003
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 03-51524) as a means to resolve claims
asserted against it related to the use of asbestos in its products
decades ago.  Richard L. Epling, Esq., Robin L. Spear, Esq., and
Kerry A. Brennan, Esq., at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, and
Paul S. Hollander, Esq., and James L. DeLuca, Esq., at Okin,
Hollander & DeLuca, LLP, represented the Debtors.

The Asbestos Claimants' Committee was represented by Peter Van N.
Lockwood, Esq., and Ronald Reinsel, Esq., at Caplin & Drysdale,
Chtd.  The Bondholders' Committee was represented by Michael S.
Stamer, Esq., and James R. Savin, Esq., at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer
& Feld LLP.  Nancy Isaacson, Esq., at Goldstein Isaacson, PC,
represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.

R. Scott Williams, Esq., at Haskell Slaughter Young & Rediker, LLC,
the Court-appointed Futures Claimants Representative, was
represented by Roger Frankel, Esq., Richard Wyron, Esq., and
Jonathan P. Guy, Esq., at Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, and
Stephen B. Ravin, Esq., at Forman Holt Eliades & Ravin LLC.

American Biltrite, Inc. (AMEX: ABL), which owns 55% of Congoleum,
was represented by Matthew Ward, Esq., Mark S. Chehi, Esq.,
Christopher S. Chow, Esq., and Matthew P. Ward, Esq., at Skadden
Arps Slate Meagher & Flom.

Various entities filed bankruptcy plans for the Debtors.  In
February 2008, the legal representative for future asbestos-related
claimants; the asbestos claimants' committee; the official
Committee of holders of the Company's 8-5/8% Senior Notes due
August 1, 2008; and Congoleum jointly filed a joint plan of
reorganization.  Various objections to the Joint Plan were filed.
In June 2008, the Bankruptcy Court issued a ruling that the Joint
Plan was not legally confirmable.

In August 2008, the Bondholders' Committee, the ACC, the FCR,
representatives of holders of prepetition settlements and Congoleum
entered into a term sheet describing the proposed material terms of
a new plan of reorganization and a settlement of avoidance
litigation with respect to prepetition claim settlement.  Certain
insurers and a large bondholder filed objections to the Litigation
Settlement or reserved their rights to object to confirmation of
the Amended Joint Plan.  The Bankruptcy Court approved the
Litigation Settlement in October 2008.  The Amended Joint Plan was
filed in November 2008.

In January 2009, certain insurers filed a motion for summary
judgment seeking denial of confirmation of the Amended Joint Plan.
On February 26, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court rendered an opinion
denying confirmation of the Amended Joint Plan.  Moreover, the
Bankruptcy Court dismissed Congoleum's bankruptcy case.

On February 27, 2009, Congoleum and the Bondholders' Committee
appealed the Order of Dismissal and the ruling denying plan
confirmation to the U.S. District Court for the District of New
Jersey.  The District Court overturned the dismissal order, and
assumed jurisdiction of the bankruptcy proceedings.

In June 2010, Congoleum Corporation obtained from the District
Court of New Jersey an order confirming Congoleum's Plan of
Reorganization.


CONTURA ENERGY: Moody's Hikes CFR to B2 & Rates New $600MM Loan B3
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded Contura Energy Inc.'s Corporate
Family Rating to B2 from B3, upgraded the Probability of Default
Rating to B2-PD from B3-PD, and assigned a B3 rating to the
company's proposed $600 million senior secured term loan due 2025.
Proceeds from the proposed term loan will be used to help
facilitate the proposed merger between Contura, ANR Inc., and Alpha
Natural Resources Holdings, Inc. Following the planned closing of
the transaction in the fourth quarter of 2018, Contura is expected
to be listed as a publicly-traded company on the NYSE. Moody's
confirmed the Caa1 rating on the existing secured debt, which is
expected to be withdrawn at closing. Moody's also assigned an SGL-2
Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating. This action concludes the
review for possible upgrade initiated on 1 May 2018. The rating
outlook is stable.

"Contura will become more diverse operationally and should generate
strong free cash flow while metallurgical coal prices remain high,"
said Ben Nelson, Moody's Vice President -- Senior Credit Officer
and lead analyst for Contura Energy.

Upgrades:

Issuer: Contura Energy, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Upgraded to B2 from B3

Probability of Default Rating, Upgraded to B2-PD from B3-PD

Assignments:

Issuer: Contura Energy, Inc.

1st Lien Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned B3 (LGD4)

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Assigned SGL-2

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Contura Energy, Inc.

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Rating Under Review

Confirmations:

Issuer: Contura Energy, Inc.

1st Lien Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Confirmed at Caa1
(LGD4)

The assigned ratings are subject to Moody's review of the terms and
conditions of the proposed transactions.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B2 CFR is principally constrained by the inherent volatility in
the metallurgical coal industry and ongoing secular decline in the
thermal coal industry that make it challenging to operate with a
leveraged balance sheet over the rating horizon. The rating also
reflects ongoing regulatory pressures on the coal mining industry,
despite improved political support since late 2016, and the
inherent geologic and operational risks associated with mining. The
rating benefits from moderate operating diversity, meaningful coal
reserves, access to multiple transportation options, relatively
strong credit metrics on a trailing twelve months basis, including
pro forma adjusted financial leverage in the mid-1 times
(Debt/EBITDA) for the twelve months ended 30 June 2018, and good
liquidity. Moody's expects that pro forma adjusted credit metrics
will remain quite strong for the rating for at least the next few
quarters.

The one-notch upgrade reflects the improved scale, operational
diversity, and expectation for meaningful free cash flow over the
next several quarters resulting from the proposed merger with
Alpha. Contura will operate eight mining complexes that produced
about 25 million tons of coal on a combined basis in 2017, split
about evenly between thermal coal and metallurgical coal. Slightly
more than two-thirds of the production is located in Central
Appalachia, where substantial capacity has been shut down over the
past decade and pricing has increased significantly over the past
two years to recently more than $70/ton, and slightly less than
one-third of the production is located in Northern Appalachia
("NAPP"), where pricing has been more stable around $40-50/ton. The
combined company no longer participates in other coal basins
following a series of divestitures. Contura will also roughly
double its production of thermal and metallurgical coal, becoming
the largest producer of metallurgical coal in the United States.
Moody's expects that prices for low-volatility metallurgical coal
will remain above its medium term price sensitivity range of
$95-$145/metric ton in the near-term, which will enable Contura to
generate EBITDA meaningfully above expected fixed charges, and
support significant free cash flow and increasing cash on the
balance sheet while metallurgical coal prices remain relatively
high. Contura's metallurgical coal is mostly high-vol A and
high-vol B coals that price at a discount to low-vol coals.

Moody's assessment of Contura's credit quality also takes into
consideration Contura's portfolio of legacy liabilities, which will
increase significantly following the merger with Alpha. Legacy
liabilities include some mining-specific items, such asset
retirement obligations, and coal-specific items, such as black lung
liabilities. While both companies have reduced legacy liabilities
since emerging from bankruptcy in 2016 by divesting assets, these
liabilities remain significant and current estimates in the
company's financial statements exceed balance sheet debt on a pro
forma basis for the proposed transactions.

The SGL-2 Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating ("SGL") reflects good
liquidity to support operations over the next 12-15 months. Pro
forma for the transaction, the company will have $317 million cash
as of June 30, 2018 and some availability under the proposed $225
million ABL facility after considering letters of credit. The ABL
facility has a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0x that is
only tested when excess availability falls below certain
thresholds. The new first lien term loan does not have any
financial covenants. Moody's expects positive free cash flows over
the next twelve months.

The stable outlook assumes that Contura will remain on track to
generate at least $300 million of EBITDA on an annual basis and
maintain at least $200 million of available liquidity, based on the
company's current debt capitalization, capital spending plans, and
financial policies. Use of internally-generated free cash flow to
reduce debt could change the expectations underpinning the stable
rating outlook. Expectations for secular decline in the US thermal
coal industry and continued volatility in the metallurgical coal
industry limit prospects for a rating upgrade even if key credit
metrics strengthen. Moody's could upgrade the rating with a
significant reduction in absolute debt, accompanied by further
clarity regarding financial policies, or a material improvement in
scale and business diversity that helps stabilize expected cash
flow generation. Moody's could downgrade the rating with
expectations for adjusted financial leverage trending above 3.5x
(Debt/EBITDA), free cash flow below $25 million, or less than $100
million of available liquidity.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Mining
published in September 2018.

Formed by a group of former first lien lenders of Alpha Natural
Resources, Contura was created to acquire and operate Alpha's core
operations in Northern Appalachia (including the Cumberland mine
complex), all Alpha's operations in the Powder River Basin and
certain assets in Central Appalachia (the Nicholas mine complex in
Nicholas County, West Virginia, and the McClure and Toms Creek mine
complexes in Dickenson and Wise Counties, Virginia). Contura also
purchased Alpha's interest in the Dominion Terminal Associates coal
export terminal in eastern Virginia. The company divested its PRB
assets at the end of 2017. For the twelve months ended June 30,
2018, Contura generated $1.7 billion in revenues.


CORNERSTONE HOMES: Oct. 5 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
----------------------------------------------------------
The hearing to consider approval of the disclosure statement
explaining the amended joint plan of reorganization proposed by
Michael H. Arnold, the duly-appointed chapter 11 trustee of
Cornerstone Homes, Inc., and the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors will be held on October 5, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

In 1997, David L. Fleet began soliciting loans from individual
investors through Cornerstone Fund, Inc.  In 2003, Cornerstone Fund
merged with the Debtor, and Fleet continued to solicit loans from
individual investors through the Debtor.  The Proponents contend
that Fleet, at all times, fraudulently solicited and obtained loans
from individual investors in violation of federal and state
securities laws and was operating the Debtor as a Ponzi scheme.

In addition to Fleet's violations of federal securities laws and
conviction for mail fraud, the Proponents contend that Fleet was
operating Debtor as a Ponzi scheme between at least 2003 and 2010.
Although Fleet obtained loans from individual investors for the
purported purpose of buying and rehabbing homes for sale and rent,
Fleet was, in fact, using certain funds borrowed from individual
investors for other purposes, including, without limitation, the
payment of amounts owed to individual investors who had previously
loaned money to the Debtor. The Proponents contend that Fleet began
seeking loans from commercial lenders in early 2006 because the
loans from individual investors could not keep pace with the
expanding Ponzi scheme.

The Proponents contend that the loans made by the commercial
lenders to the Debtor between
2006 and 2009 enabled Fleet to perpetuate his illegal and
fraudulent scheme.  In 2015 and 2016, the Trustee commenced actions
against four of the commercial lenders seeking, inter alia, to
avoid the transfers made by the Debtor to the commercial lenders.

The Trustee and the Committee reached settlements with two of the
commercial lenders in 2016 and 2017, resulting in approximately
$3.8 million of additional unencumbered property released to the
Debtor's estate and the elimination of approximately $6 million of
secured claims. The Trustee and the Committee have been unable to
reach a settlement with respect to the two remaining commercial
lenders, First Citizens National Bank and the Community
Preservation Corporation.

A trial on the Trustee's claims against First Citizens and CPC is
scheduled to begin on November 5, 2018.  In an effort to avoid the
Trustee's claims, First Citizens and CPC have filed a proposed
joint plan of liquidation pursuant to which they propose to settle
the claims against them. The Trustee and the Committee oppose First
Citizens' and CPC's proposed plan of liquidation and do not believe
that the proposed terms of settlement are fair or reasonable. The
Trustee and the Committee urge unsecured creditors to vote against
First Citizens' and CPC's proposed plan of liquidation. The Trustee
and the Committee recommend that unsecured creditors vote in favor
of their proposed amended joint plan of reorganization as they
believe that this Plan will maximize the recovery for unsecured
creditors.

Since the collapse of the Ponzi scheme in April 2010, First
Citizens and CPC have received payments totaling in excess of $11.2
million on their original debt of $19.8 million.  In contrast,
during the same time period, the individual investors have received
payments totaling less than $700,000 on their original debt of
$15.5 million.

Pursuant to the Plan, the Debtor will restructure its existing debt
and continue to operate as a Reorganized Debtor. In accordance with
the Plan, the Reorganized Debtor will pay unsecured creditors $10.5
million through monthly payments of principal and interest at the
rate of 4% per annum amortized over a 15 year period.  The payments
under the Class 3 Note will enable unsecured creditors to recover
approximately 70% of their original claims against the Debtor. In
addition to the Class 3 Note, the Reorganized Debtor will issue
100% of the New Common Stock to unsecured creditors.

The Plan contemplates that the Reorganized Debtor will continue the
prosecution of the pending claims against First Citizens and CPC.
In the event that the Reorganized Debtor is successful in the
pending litigation against First Citizens and CPC or the parties
reach a fair and reasonable settlement of such claims, the
Reorganized Debtor anticipates that unsecured creditors will
receive a distribution greater than 70% and that such distribution
will be made over a time period shorter than 15 years.

A copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y96re3c4 from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                      About Cornerstone Homes

Cornerstone Homes Inc. is based in Corning, New York, and was
engaged in the business of buying, selling and leasing single
family homes in the State of New York, with such properties
primarily located in the South Central and South Western portions
of the State.

Cornerstone Homes Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D.N.Y.
Case No. 13-21103) on July 15, 2013, in Rochester, New York.  The
Debtor disclosed assets of $18.6 million and liabilities of $36.2
million.

Judge Paul R. Warren presides over the case.  Curtiss Alan Johnson,
Esq., and David L. Rasmussen, Esq., at Davidson Fink, LLP, in
Rochester, N.Y., serve as the Debtor's counsel.  The Debtor has
tapped GAR Associates to appraise a selection of its properties to
support the Debtor's liquidation analysis.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors is represented by
Gregory J. Mascitti, Esq., at LeClairRyan PC.  The Committee
retained Getzler Henrich & Associates LLC as financial advisor.

                           *     *     *

The Debtor sought Chapter 11 protection with a reorganization plan
already accepted by 96% of unsecured creditors' claims.  Four
secured lenders with $21.8 million in claims are to be paid
in full under the plan.  Unsecured creditors -- chiefly Noteholders
with $14.5 million in claims -- were to have a 7% recovery.

The Court has not confirmed the Debtor's Plan.  Instead, the Court
accepted the request of the Committee to appoint a Chapter 11
trustee to replace management.  The Court approved the appointment
of Michael H. Arnold, Esq., as Chapter 11 trustee.

The Chapter 11 trustee tapped as counsel his own firm, Place and
Arnold.  LeClairRyan and Barclay Damon LLP serve as his special
counsel.

The Trustee was appointed after accusations that the principal,
David L. Fleet, operated the Debtor as a massive Ponzi scheme in
loving millions of dollars and hundreds of mostly elderly,
unsophisticated individual investor victims who shared the same
religious beliefs espoused by Fleet.

The Trustee has commenced an adversary proceeding against First
Citizens National Bank for enabling Mr. Fleet to perpetuate the
Ponzi scheme by providing bank loans.



DAIRY ROAD: District Court Dismisses TAC vs Maui Gas, Paul Cheng
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dairy Road and Nakamura initiated the action captioned DAIRY ROAD
PARTNERS and GLENN NAKAMURA, Plaintiffs, v. MAUI GAS VENTURES LLC
and PAUL CHENG, Defendants, Civ. No. 16-00611 DKW-KJM (D. Haw.) on
Nov. 16, 2016. On July 20, 2017, they filed a Second Amended
Complaint ("SAC"), seeking monetary damages and equitable relief
arising out of an alleged, fraudulently procured loan agreement
with Maui Gas and Cheng. On March 9, 2018, the Court dismissed the
SAC, allowing leave to amend only the Count I claim for
Fraud/Misrepresentation. Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended
Complaint ("TAC") on April 9, 2018.

Upon review, District Judge Derrick K. Watson grants Defendants'
motion to dismiss the TAC without leave to amend.

On April 9, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint,
setting forth the basis for Dairy Road's re-asserted allegations of
fraud and/or misrepresentation. Conspicuously absent from the
exhibits attached to the TAC, however, are a majority of the e-mail
communications provided in SAC Exhibit 7. Instead, the TAC attaches
a handful of specific e-mails, each as a separate exhibit that is
devoid of context offered by the surrounding e-mail "threads"
previously visible to the Court via SAC Exhibit 7.

Defendants filed their motion to dismiss the TAC on April 23, 2018.
Defendants contend that Plaintiffs' operative pleading once again
fails to plead a viable fraud claim, and that even if it did,
Plaintiffs' fraud claim is foreclosed by the TAC's own exhibits as
well as the exhibits Plaintiffs offered with the July 2017 SAC.

Plaintiffs have maintained that the "very central essence" of the
parties' agreement was that Defendants would "stop any foreclosure
so as to provide [Plaintiffs] with breathing room and refinancing
options." Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that "in order to induce
immediate change of behavior," "Cheng and his attorneys and
accountants" made statements misrepresenting "contemporaneously"
that: (1) Defendants "intended to help" Plaintiffs (2) Defendants
"would purchase the ASB [L]oan indirectly for" Plaintiffs; (3)
Defendants "would give [Plaintiffs] time to buy back the property";
(4) Plaintiffs "would have three options for buying back the
property and that they could choose any one of the three" (5) "upon
the purchase of the ASB [L]oan," Defendants "would not foreclose"
and would dismiss the Foreclosure Action (6) "there would be no
foreclosure deficiency judgment against" Plaintiffsand (7)
Plaintiffs "would benefit from the discounted price negotiated and
paid to ASB." Plaintiffs contend that they "were damaged as a
result of" these seven "false promises."

Defendants argue that these allegations--although somewhat more
detailed than their previous counterparts in the SAC--still fail to
plead a viable claim for either Misrepresentation or Fraud under
the stringent pleading requirements set forth in Rule 9(b) of the
FRCP. The Court finds that the Defendants are correct.

"An allegation of fraud is sufficient" under Rule 9(b) "if it
`identifies the circumstances constituting fraud so that the
defendant can prepare an adequate answer from the allegations.'" To
sufficiently "identif[y] the circumstances constituting fraud," a
plaintiff must identify facts providing details of the alleged
fraudulent activity such as times, dates, and places. Moreover,
beyond setting forth the objective facts necessary to identify the
allegedly fraudulent statements or transactions, a plaintiff "must
set forth what is false or misleading about [a given] statement,
and why it is false."

Here, the seven "misrepresentations" described in the pleadings do
not meet these standards. Plaintiffs generally assert that "[a]ll
of the above assurances and representations and reliances are fully
documented and embodied in detail throughout the above-referenced
nearly four months of emails variously exchanged in the
correspondence, between Cheng, Choi, Wong and/or Barbieri during
the months of September, October, November, and December 2014." In
other words, just as they did in the SAC, Plaintiffs once again
rely heavily on SAC Exhibit 7 to make their case. As the Court
previously noted, however, the negotiations history chronicled in
the emails cited by Plaintiffs do nothing of the sort. An
additional example of that is Plaintiffs' continued complaint that
Cheng falsely promised to provide at least three buyback options
with Plaintiffs being allowed to choose from among any of the
three. The record evidences that Cheng did exactly that. Cheng did
provide three buyback options from which Plaintiffs could have
selected. Plaintiffs may not have been amenable to the choices, but
they were certainly offered. In short, Plaintiffs' own record
largely contradicts their protestations of fraud by failing to
evidence falsities perpetrated by Defendants.  Accordingly, the TAC
does little to address the pleadings deficiencies previously
identified by the Court.

Plaintiffs also have offered nothing beyond conclusory statements
that "Cheng had only intended to take advantage of [Dairy Road] and
Nakamura from the beginning of their negotiations" and "had never
intended to go forward with his promises to Nakamura." Those
conclusory statements are not only not supported by the record,
but, in many cases, they are contradicted by Plaintiffs' exhibits
to the TAC, as well as by the exhibits Plaintiffs previously
attached to the SAC.Accordingly, Plaintiffs' claim for
fraud/misrepresentation is dismissed.

A full-text copy of the Court's Order dated August 16, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2M8ziBn from Leagle.com.

Dairy Road Partners, a Hawaii limited partnership & Glenn Nakamura,
Plaintiffs, represented by Frederick J. Arensmeyer , Dubin Law
Offices & Gary Victor Dubin , Dubin Law Offices.

Maui Gas Ventures LLC & Paul Cheng, Defendants, represented by
James Blaine Rogers, III – blaine.rogers@dentons.com -- Dentons
US LLP, John S. Rhee -- john.rhee@dentons.com -- Dentons US LLP &
Paul Alston -- paul.alston@dentons.com -- Dentons US LLP.

Based in Kahului, HI, Dairy Road Partners filed for chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Haw. Case No. 13-01138) on July 3,
2013, with estimated assets at $1,000,001 to $10,000,000 and
estimated liabilities at $1,000,001 to $10,000,000. The petition
was signed by Glenn M. Nakamura.


DASK LLC: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
-------------------------------------------
Debtor: Dask LLC
        8327 W 4th Street
        Los Angeles, CA 90048

Business Description: DASK LLC filed as a Single Asset Real Estate
                      Debtor (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101
                      (51B)).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 11, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Case No.: 18-20547

Debtor's Counsel: Hayk Grigoryan, Esq.
                  3435 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 2706
                  Los Angeles CA 90010
                  Tel: 323-350-0942
                  Fax: 323-350-0942
                  Email: grigoryanlaw@gmail.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Sasha Demovsky-Kapustyan,
member-manager.

The Debtor lists Specialized Loan Servicing as its sole
unsecured creditor holding an unknown amount of claim.

A full-text copy of the is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-20547.pdf


DESTINY WORD: Taps Rogers Law Offices as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
Destiny Word Ministries, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia to hire
Rogers Law Offices as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; represent the Debtor in administrative or
contested matters and adversary proceedings; assist in the
preparation of a bankruptcy plan; and provide other legal services
related to its Chapter 11 case.

Rogers Law Offices will charge these hourly rates:

     Beth Rogers          $350
     James Carroll        $295
     Tersugh Tivzenda     $175

The firm received a retainer in the sum of $25,000, plus the filing
fee of $1,717.

Beth Rogers, Esq., at Rogers Law Offices, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm neither holds nor represents any interest
adverse to the Debtor's estate.

The firm can be reached through:

      Beth E. Rogers, Esq.
      Rogers Law Offices, Suite 1950
      100 Peachtree Street
      Atlanta, GA 30303
      Tel: (770) 685-6320
      Fax: (678) 990-9959
      Email: brogers@berlawoffice.com

                About Destiny Word Ministries Inc.

Destiny Word Ministries, Inc. -- https://destiny.city -- is the fee
simple owner of a church building located at 1775 Water Place,
Atlanta, Georgia, valued at $13 million.  It was founded in 1996.

Destiny Word Ministries sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 18-64676) on August 31,
2018.  In the petition signed by Lanette Crute, president and CEO,
the Debtor disclosed $15,021,512 in assets and $9,661,388 in
liabilities.


DIVERSIFIED POWER: Unsecureds to be Paid 0.006% Over 10 Years
-------------------------------------------------------------
Diversified Power Systems, Inc., filed a motion asking the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas for conditional
approval of its small business disclosure statement describing its
chapter 11 plan dated Sept. 4, 2018.

Under the plan, general unsecured creditors in Class 5 will be paid
0.006% distribution Pro-Rata over 10 years.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
normal operations of the generator service and sales company.

The primary risk factor to the success of the Plan is the
possibility that the sales will underperform and not be
sufficiently profitable to fund the payments required by the Plan.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Sept. 4, 2018 is available
for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb17-44538-11-63.pdf

             About Diversified Power Systems

Diversified Power Systems, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-44538) on Nov. 6, 2017,
disclosing under $50,000 in both assets and liabilities.  William
R. Bertrand, president, signed the petition.  The Debtor is
represented by Craig D. Davis, Esq., at Davis Ermis & Roberts, P.C.


DOMINO ONE: Case Summary & 6 Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Domino One, LLC
        212 N. Fogg St.
        Las Vegas, NV 89110

Business Description: Domino One, LLC owns five separate
                      properties in Las Vegas, Nevada with a total
                      appraised value of $869,000.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 10, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Nevada (Las Vegas)

Case No.: 18-15409

Debtor's Counsel: Marilyn A. Caston, Esq.
                  NEVADA FAMILY LAW GROUP
                  10120 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 140
                  Henderson, NV 89052
                  Tel: (702) 910-4300
                  Fax: (702) 910-4303
                  E-mail: mckinneylaw3@gmail.com

Total Assets: $869,000

Total Liabilities: $1,231,331

The petition was signed by Ronald D. Harris, managing member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's six unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb18-15409.pdf


DORIAN LPG: Says it Will Respond to BW's Proposal in Due Course
---------------------------------------------------------------
Dorian LPG issued the following statement in response to quotes in
the press from representatives of BW LPG about Dorian's level of
engagement following BW's unsolicited proposal:

"We welcome input and feedback from all of our shareholders.  The
board and management team are singularly focused on maximizing
value for Dorian shareholders.

"It is in this spirit that Dorian has met multiple times with BW's
leadership team, including an in-person meeting with the entire
Dorian board and BW.  We also requested information regarding BW's
net asset values since July -- we did not make providing that info
a condition to these meetings -- and BW only provided this
information just a few days ago.  We are in the process of
scheduling a meeting to discuss this information with BW.

"It is disingenuous for BW to characterize Dorian as nonresponsive,
and to completely mislead shareholders by failing to discuss the
facts of the situation.

"The Dorian Board and management team continue to explore whether
BW can deliver appropriate value to Dorian shareholders as we
evaluate the opportunities before us.  We will not close doors to
potential opportunities, and will respond to BW's proposal in due
course."

                       About Dorian LPG

Stamford, Connecticut-based Dorian LPG Ltd. --
http://www.dorianlpg.com/-- is a liquefied petroleum gas shipping
company and an owner and operator of modern very large gas carriers
("VLGCs").  Dorian LPG's fleet currently consists of twenty-two
modern VLGCs.  Dorian LPG has offices in Stamford, Connecticut,
USA, London, United Kingdom and Athens, Greece.

Dorian LPG reported a net loss of US$20.40 million for the year
ended March 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of US$1.44 million for
the year ended March 31, 2017.  As of June 30, 2018, Dorian LPG had
US$1.70 billion in total assets, US$761.83 million in total
liabilities and US$939.31 million in total shareholders' equity.


DOUBLE EAGLE: New Plan to Pay Unsecureds in Full with No Interest
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Double Eagle Energy Services, LLC, filed an immaterially modified
first amended disclosure statement relating to its immaterially
modified first amended plan of liquidation dated Sept. 4, 2018.

In this latest submission, the Debtor discloses that it anticipates
filing a lawsuit for breach of lease and property damage against
iFab Industrial. Debtor's property damage estimate exceeds
$237,000. The net proceeds of this litigation will be applied to
satisfy the Class 6 General Unsecured Claims pro rata and without
interest. The Debtor has filed the Plan as there appears to be no
other alternative.

Under the amended liquidation plan, general unsecured creditors
will be paid in full with no interest if there are funds available
to pay the claims after full satisfaction of the Secured Claims in
Classes 1 through 5.

The previous version of the plan provided that general unsecured
claims will be paid 10% of their claims over a 10-year period with
no interest, with monthly payments to begin 60 days from the
confirmation of this Plan.

A full-text copy of the Modified First Amended Disclosure Statement
is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/lawb17-80717-231.pdf

            About Double Eagle Energy Services

Founded in 2006, Double Eagle Energy Services, a company based in
Alexandria, Louisiana, provides general contracting services
including constructing water and sewer mains.

The Debtor filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No.
17-80717) on July 17, 2017. In its petition, the Debtor indicated
$12.41 million in total assets and $13.18 million in total
liabilities. The petition was signed by Joe Ratcliff or Bob
Ratcliff, its owners.

Judge John W. Kolwe presides over the case. Bradley L. Drell, Esq.,
at Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel. The Debtor hired Colvin, Smith & McKay as its
special counsel.


DUNLEVIE HOLDINGS: Taps McCallar Law Firm as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
Dunlevie Holdings, LLC, is awaiting permission from the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Georgia,
Savannah Division, to employ C. James McCallar, Jr. and Tiffany E.
Caron of McCallar Law Firm as its counsel.

A hearing on the employment application was held August 28 and
continued to October 23.

The Debtor needs the firm to render general representation of the
Debtor and perform all legal services as may be necessary.

The firm's professionals who will work on the case and their hourly
rates are:

     C. James McCallar, Jr.     $400
     Tiffany E. Caron           $300

McCallar Law Firm attests that its attorneys have no interest
adverse to the Debtor or its estate, and the employment would be in
the best interest of the estate.

McCallar Law Firm can be reached at:

     C. James McCallar, Jr., Esq.
     Tiffany E. Caron, Esq.
     McCALLAR LAW FIRM
     P.O. Box 9026
     Savannah, GA 31412
     Tel: (912) 234-1215

Dunlevie Holdings, LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. S.D. Ga. 18-40928) on July 3, 2018, listing under $50,000
in assets and $50,001 to $100,000 in liabilities.  The Hon. Edward
J Coleman III oversees the case.

The United States Trustee has advised the Court it was unable to
appoint an official creditors' committee.



ECS REFINING: Trustee Seeks Approval on 7th Cash Collateral Use
---------------------------------------------------------------
W. Donald Gieseke, the duly-appointed and acting Chapter 11 Trustee
for the bankruptcy estate of ECS Refining, Inc., files with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California, his
Seventh Emergency Motion for an interim order authorizing the use
of cash collateral.

The Trustee wants to obtain approval of cash collateral use for
another short period for the winding down of Debtor's business
operations in compliance with requirements of local, state and
federal regulators.

The Trustee and his professionals are working diligently to remove
and dispose of the Debtor's inventory, clean the Debtor's
equipment, and turn over premises to landlords in a reasonably
clean condition and in compliance with requirements of local, state
and federal regulators.  

The Trustee asserts that the removal of the inventory, cleaning of
equipment, and cleaning and testing of leased locations is
necessary to recover approximately $637,000 in funds posted funds
with the California Department of Toxic Substances Control
("DTSC"). The Trustee also is working on properly dealing with the
SB 20 program inventory to maximize the ability to recover
receivables due under that program.

Thus, the Trustee claims that the use of cash collateral will allow
the Trustee to pay expenses necessary to accomplish these tasks.

The Trustee has presented a cash collateral budget to SummitBridge
National Investments V LLC for its review and approval, and the
Trustee believes SummitBridge will consent to the proposed use of
its cash collateral on an interim basis.

SummitBridge asserts that as of the Petition Date, the Debtor was
indebted to SummitBridge in excess of $25,000,000, secured by a
valid and perfected first priority lien and security interest in
substantially all of Debtor's property and all proceeds (including
insurance) thereof.

The Trustee proposes to grant SummitBridge a replacement lien on
any and all post-petition assets of Debtor of the same kind and
character and to the same extent, validity and priority as
SummitBridge's pre-petition liens to the extent of use of cash
collateral.

In addition, the Trustee will grant SummitBridge an allowed
superpriority administrative claim pursuant to Section 507(b) of
the Bankruptcy Code, and provide that SummitBridge's liens continue
in the proceeds and profits of the Pre-Petition Collateral pursuant
to section 552(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

A copy of the Seventh Emergency Cash Collateral Motion is available
at

http://bankrupt.com/misc/caeb18-22453-380.pdf

                      About ECS Refining Inc.

ECS Refining, Inc. -- https://www.ecsrefining.com/ -- offers a full
suite of IT asset management and disposition solutions.  It
provides national brand protection solutions for environmental
services, IT asset management, data protection and end-of-life
electronic recycling services.  ECS was founded in 1980 by Jim and
Ken Taggart as a processor of post-manufacturing scrap and residues
for OEMs in the Silicon Valley.  

As the electronics industry enjoyed rapid growth and manufacturing
operations were outsourced to other parts of the world, ECS adapted
by shifting its focus to processing post-consumer electronics.  The
company has locations in Rogers, Arizona; Santa Clara, California;
Santa Fe Springs, California; Stockton, California; Columbus, Ohio;
Medford, Oregon; Portland, Oregon; and Mesquite, Texas.  

ECS Refining sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 18-22453) on April 24, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Jack Rockwood, president, the Debtor
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of
$10 million to $50 million.  

Judge Robert S. Bardwil presides over the case.

The Debtor tapped Snell & Wilmer LLP as its legal counsel; Ringstad
& Sanders LLP as special counsel; and MCA Financial Group, Ltd., as
its financial advisor.

W. Donald Gieseke was appointed as the Chapter 11 Trustee.  The
Trustee hired Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby & Pascuzzi LLP as
his legal counsel.


EDEN HOME: Seeks Court Approval to Employ OCPs
----------------------------------------------
Eden Home, Inc., has filed a motion seeking approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas to hire
professionals used in the ordinary course of business.

The request, if granted, would allow the Debtor to hire "ordinary
course professionals" without filing separate employment or fee
applications.

The ordinary course professionals are:

     Professionals                   Services Provided
     -------------                   -----------------
     Cory Macdonald                  Counsel for
     Macdonald Resnevic, PLLC        Regulatory Compliance
     1717 W. 6th Street, Suite 355
     Austin, TX 78703

     Best & Spruill, P.C.            Counsel for Debtor before
     6805 N. Capital of Texas        the Texas Health & Human    
     Suite 330                       Services Commission       
     Austin, TX 78731                Administrator's
                                     Credentialing Unit

The Debtor anticipates that average monthly fees will not exceed
$30,000 per month, in the aggregate, for all OCPs.  Compensation
for all OCPs for the entire period in which the Debtor's Chapter 11
case is pending will be capped at $180,000.

                         About Eden Home

Located in New Braunfels, Texas, Eden Home, Inc., d/b/a EdenHill
Communities -- https://www.edenhill.org/ -- is a not-for-profit,
faith-based organization that provides independent living,
affordable housing, assisted living, skilled nursing and
rehabilitation, long-term care and memory care services.  The
EdenHill Communities Transportation Department provides ADA
services in support of seniors and individuals with disabilities.

Eden Home, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case
No. 18-50608) on March 16, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Laurence P. Dahl, CEO and executive director, the Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.

Judge Craig A. Gargotta is the case judge.

Dykema Cox Smith is the Debtor's counsel; Langley & Banack, and
Gravely & Pearson, L.L.P., as special counsels; Cushman & Wakefield
as real estate broker. Cushman & Wakefield has entered into a
Co-Broker Agreement with CF Commercial Brokerage, LLC d/b/a San
Antonio Commercial Advisors.

On March 26, 2018, the U.S. Trustee appointed Susan N. Goodman as
the patient care ombudsman in the case.

An official committee of unsecured creditors was appointed on May
30, 2018.  The committee retained Martin & Drought, P.C., as
counsel.


ELKHORN JONES: Taps Larson Zirzow as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------
Elkhorn Jones Memory Care, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada to hire Larson Zirzow &
Kaplan, LLC as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in any potential sale of its assets; assist
in the preparation of a plan of reorganization; and provide other
legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

Larson Zirzow will charge these hourly rates:

     Shareholders          $500
     Paraprofessionals     $220

The firm received a retainer in the sum of $40,000, which was
provided by the Debtor's manager, Victor Hecker, personally.

Larson Zirzow and its attorneys are "disinterested persons" as
defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to
court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Zachariah Larson, Esq.     
     Matthew C. Zirzow, Esq.
     Larson Zirzow & Kaplan, LLC
     850 E. Bonneville Ave.
     Las Vegas, NV 89101
     Tel: (702) 382-1170
     Fax: (702) 382-1169
     E-mail: zlarson@lzklegal.com
     E-mail: mzirzow@lzklegal.com

                 About Elkhorn Jones Memory Care

Elkhorn Jones Memory Care, LLC -- http://www.elkhornmemory.com--
operates an assisted living facility for seniors with dementia and
alzheimer's disease.  It is located at 6017 Elkhorn Road, Las
Vegas, Nevada.

Elkhorn Jones Memory Care sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 18-15081) on August 24,
2018.  In the petition signed by Victor Hecker, manager, the Debtor
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  

Judge Laurel E. Babero presides over the case.


ENOVA INTERNATIONAL: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable & Affirms 'B' ICR
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it revised its outlook on Enova
International Inc. to stable from negative and affirmed its 'B'
long-term issuer credit rating.

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned a 'B-' rating and '5'
recovery rating to Enova's announced issuance of $375 million of
senior unsecured notes due 2025. The '5' recovery rating reflects
our expectation of a modest 10% recovery in a hypothetical default
scenario. The revision of our outlook is not contingent on the
completion of Enova's proposed refinancing.

"The revision of our outlook to stable reflects S&P Global Ratings'
view that Enova will maintain leverage of 3.5x-4.5x debt to EBITDA
over the next year. Debt to adjusted EBITDA declined to 4.0x at the
end of the second quarter from 5.0x at the end of 2017.

"The stable outlook reflects S&P Global Ratings' view that Enova
will maintain leverage between 3.5x and 4.5x debt to adjusted
EBITDA and see top-line benefit from installment loan products over
the next 12 months.

"We could lower the ratings if leverage were to deteriorate to
levels above 5x debt to EBITDA. This scenario could result from
weaker performance in installment loans or line-of-credit products,
a more burdensome regulatory landscape or additional debt
issuances.   

"Over time, we could raise the ratings if the company maintains
leverage of 3.0x-3.5x while sustaining or growing EBITDA and
lessening its revenue from short-term loans."


ENRIQUE GREENBERG: 1st Cir. Dismisses Appeals as Moot
-----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit dismisses the appeals
cases captioned ENRIQUE V. GREENBERG, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES
TRUSTEE Appellee, No. 16-6008, ENRIQUE V. GREENBERG, Appellant, v.
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; et al. Appellees, No. 16-60089,
ENRIQUE V. GREENBERG, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION; et al. Appellees, 17-60029 (9th Cir.) as moot.

Greenberg appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's
interlocutory orders denying Greenberg's motions for a stay pending
appeal and an order denying Greenberg's motion for reconsideration
of the BAP's order dismissing his appeal as moot.

After Greenberg filed the appeals, the court dismissed his appeal
from a judgment of the BAP affirming the bankruptcy court's order
dismissing Greenberg's chapter 11 bankruptcy case as filed in bad
faith. Accordingly, these appeals are rendered moot because the
court is unable to grant the requested relief.

A copy of the Court's Opinion dated August 27, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2wLR3Sf from Leagle.com.

Enrique V. Greenberg sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S. D. Calif. Case No. 15-06578) on October
13, 2015.


ENTERPRISE ELECTRIC: Taps CliftonLarsonAllen as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Electric, Inc.. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Idaho to hire CliftonLarsonAllen LLP as
its accountant.

The firm will assist the Debtor in the preparation and filing of
tax returns, 1099's and quarterly reports, and will review and
analyze its business records.

CliftonLarsonAllen charges these hourly rates:

     Principals            $250    
     Managers              $200  
     Senior Associates     $150  
     Associates            $100

Bill Dempsey, the CliftonLarsonAllen accountant who will be
providing the services, disclosed in a court filing that he has no
connection with the Debtor or any of its creditors.

The firm can be reached through:

     Bill Dempsey
     CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
     800 West Main Street, Suite 1220
     Boise, ID 83702
     Phone: 208.387.6400 / 208-387-6413

                  About Enterprise Electric Inc.

Enterprise Electric, Inc. -- https://enterpriseelectricboise.com/
-- is an electrical contractor serving industrial, commercial and
residential customers in western Idaho and eastern Oregon.  The
company specializes in energy management, production efficiency,
safety and security and environmental quality solutions.  It offers
repair and maintenance, new construction, panel upgrades, energy
management, retrofit, and data cabling services.

Enterprise Electric sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Idaho Case No. 18-00744) on June 8,
2018.  In the petition signed by Clinton Tate, president, the
Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  

Judge Joseph M. Meier presides over the case.  The Law Office of D.
Blair Clark, PC, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


FM 544 PARK VISTA: Bankr. Ct. Approves Trustee's Plan Modifications
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Stacey G. C. Jernigan issues her findings of facts
and conclusions of law regarding the Motion for Determination That
Plan Modifications Do Not Adversely Affect Any Accepting Creditor
That Has Not Accepted the Modifications in Writing filed by Debtors
FM 544 Park Vista LTD and and Pavist LLC by and through their
Chapter 11 Trustee, Kevin D. McCullough.

The Court, after noting that due notice of the Plan Modification
Motion had been given to all parties-in-interest at the
Confirmation Hearing and after the consideration of the evidence
submitted and the arguments of counsel during the confirmation
hearing, finds that adequate information was contained in Trustee's
Amended Joint Disclosure Statement in this case as set forth in
Section 1125 of the Code.

The Plan Modification Motion does not cause a material adverse
change to the treatment of any class of creditors or interests that
voted to accept the Plan, but which has not accepted the Plan
Modifications in writing, as such parties' written consents to the
modifications were attached to the Plan Modification Motion.

Thus, The Trustee's Amended Joint Plans, as modified, do not
violate Sections 1122 and 1123 of the Code and meets all of the
requirements of Section 1129 of the Code.

All creditors and interest holders who voted in favor of Trustee's
Amended Joint Plans are deemed to have accepted the Plan
Modifications.

The bankruptcy cases are in re: FM 544 PARK VISTA LTD., and PAVIST
LLC, Debtors, Case Nos. 17-34255-sgj-11, 17-34274-SGJ-11 (Bankr.
N.D. Tex.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Findings dated August 20, 22018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2wTRhWE from Leagle.com.

FM 544 Park Vista Ltd., Debtor, represented by Edwin Paul Keiffer
-- PKeiffer@RoMcLaw.com -- Rochelle McCullough, LLP & Joseph F.
Postnikoff, Goodrich Postnikoff & Associates, LLP.

Pavist LLC, Joint Debtor, represented by Joseph F. Postnikoff,
Goodrich Postnikoff & Associates, LLP.

Kevin D. McCullough, Trustee, represented by Edwin Paul Keiffer,
Rochelle McCullough, LLP & Kathryn Gillian Reid, Rochelle
McCullough LLP.

United States Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Nancy Sue
Resnick, Office of The United States Trustee.

                 About FM 544 Park Vista

FM 544 Park Vista Ltd. was formed on April 29, 2014, to acquire and
prepare for development a 31.5 acre tract located in Plano, Collin
County, Texas as a 318-unit senior housing apartment complex.  The
general partner of FM 544 is Pavist, a limited liability company,
while the sole limited partner is Shaw Family Trust No. 3.

FM 544 Park Vista Ltd., based in Addison, Texas, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-34255) on Nov. 7, 2017.
Pavist, LLC, filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-34274-11) on
Nov. 9.  Richard Shaw, their manager, signed the petitions.

The bankruptcy cases are being jointly administered for procedural
purposes only under the case of FM 544 Park Vista.  Judge Stacey G.
Jernigan presides over the cases.

FM 544 estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.

Joseph F. Postnikoff, Esq., at Goodrich Postnikoff & Associates,
LLP, is the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.

Kevin D. McCullough was appointed Chapter 11 trustee for the
Debtors.  The Trustee retained his own firm, Rochelle McCullough,
LLP, as counsel.  He tapped Barg & Henson, P.C., as his accountant.


FOODSERVICEWAREHOUSE: PMP Summary Ruling Bid vs RSL Partly Granted
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned RESTAURANT SUPPLY, LLC, v. PRIDE MARKETING
AND PROCUREMENT, INC., SECTION "F," Civil Action No. 17-8793 (E.D.
La.), District Judge Martin L.C. Feldman granted the Defendant
Pride Marketing and Procurement, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment
as to the plaintiff's claim for equitable accounting, denied as to
its claims for conversion and breach of contract, and denied as to
its claims for fiduciary duty and the duty of loyalty, and
negligence.

In its Restated and Amended Complaint, Restaurant Supply asserts
five claims:  (1) equitable accounting; (2) conversion; (3) breach
of contract; (4) breach of fiduciary duty and the duty of loyalty;
(5) negligence.

The first count of Restaurant Supply's complaint is "Equitable
Accounting." Restaurant Supply specifies that it "seeks an
accounting for the sums due it from Pride both as its agent and
otherwise and a judgment for payment of said sums." The Fifth
Circuit has defined equitable accounting as "the means by which the
value of th[e] damages may be calculated." It allows the plaintiff
to shift the burden of discovery to the defendants. The voluminous
record and the active motion practice make clear that both parties
have heavily participated in discovery and in parsing the financial
documents related to the rebates. Moreover, the Magistrate Judge
ordered Pride to produce audited financial statements from 2015 and
2016 and its original tax return for 2015. Restaurant Supply has
not mentioned this cause of action in any of its subsequent motions
or replies, let alone submit any evidence as to why it is entitled
to relief from its burden of calculating its damages. Because it
has wholly failed to submit any evidence in regards to its claim
for equitable accounting, Pride is entitled to summary judgment.

Conversion is "an act in derogation of the plaintiff's possessory
rights, and any wrongful exercise or assumption of authority over
another's goods, depriving him of the possession, permanently or
for an indefinite time." Because there is an issue of fact as to
whether Restaurant Supply had a right to rebates under Section
10.2, the Court cannot determine its claim to conversion.

Likewise, a determination of Restaurant Supply's breach of contract
claim is inappropriate on this record. Section 9.1 of the By-laws
provides that "[t]hese by-laws . . . shall constitute a binding
contract between the corporation and its Shareholders." There is a
factual dispute as to whether Pride breached its obligations to
distribute patronage dividends under Section 10.2 of Article X of
the By-Laws.

Restaurant Supply also claims that Pride breached its fiduciary
duty and duty of loyalty by pledging its rebates. Pride contends
that it does not have a fiduciary relationship with Restaurant
Supply, and even if it does, it did not violate its duties because
Restaurant Supply does not own the rebates. But because it
(appropriately) dedicated its motion to addressing whether Pride
had any ownership rights, it only very briefly addressed the issue
of fiduciary duty. Restaurant Supply addressed it with even less
specificity. Likewise, Pride only dedicated a few sentences to the
negligence claim, and Restaurant Supply did not reach the issue.
Because the issues were not adequately briefed, the Court will not
reach the merits of this issue.

A full-text copy of the Court's Order and Reasons dated August 22,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2N2PE3Y from Leagle.com.

Restaurant Supply, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by John Y. Pearce --
jpearce@gamb.law -- Gordon, Arata, Montgomery & Barnett, Michael
Edward Landis -- mlandis@gamb.law.com -- Gordon, Arata, Montgomery
& Barnett,Richard E. Zubic -- rzubic@gamblaw.com -- Gordon, Arata,
Montgomery & Barnett & Stephen Lynn Williamson --
swilliamson@gamblaw.com -- Gordon, Arata, Montgomery & Barnett.

Pride Marketing and Procurement, Inc. & Pride Centric Resources,
Inc., formerly known as Pride Marketing and Procurement, Inc.,
Defendants, represented by Melissa M. Lessell --
mlessell@deutschkerrigan.com -- Deutsch Kerrigan LLP, William
Everard Wright, Jr. -- wwright@deutschjerrigan.com -- Deutsch
Kerrigan LLP & Karuna Dave -- kdaver@deutschkerrigan.com –
Deutsch Kerrigan LLP.

               About FoodServiceWarehouse.com

FoodServiceWarehouse.com, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 16-11179) on
May 20, 2016.  The petition was signed by Thomas Kim, chief
restructuring officer.  The case is assigned to Judge Elizabeth
Magner.

The Debtor tapped Barry W. Miller, Esq., at Heller, Draper,
Patrick, Horn & Dabney, L.L.C., as counsel; r2 Advisors, LLC as
financial advisor; HyperAMS, LLC, as liquidation consultant; and
Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc. as its claims, noticing and
solicitation agent.

The Debtor estimated its assets and liabilities in the range of $10
million to $50 million at the time of the filing.


FRASER'S BOILER: Court Tosses Travelers' Bid for Leave to Appeal
----------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Benjamin H. Settle entered an order denying
Appellant Travelers Indemnity Company's motion for leave to appeal
in the case captioned TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v.
FRASER'S BOILER SERVICE, INC., Appellee, Case No. C18-5489 BHS
(W.D. Wash.).

On April 9, the Debtor Fraser's Boiler Service Inc. filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy despite no possibility of reorganization and
no enterprise value to preserve. In a Chapter 11, the management
for the debtor is the "trustee" of the estate and, subject to
bankruptcy court approval, may propose professionals. Travelers
filed a Motion to Convert the Chapter 11 case to a Chapter 7 case
in an effort to involve an impartial Chapter 7 trustee to more
equitably manage the estate.

On May 16, 2018, the bankruptcy court held a hearing and denied
Travelers' motion to convert.

In this case, Travelers fails to show that the denial of its motion
to convert is an exceptional circumstance that involves a
controlling question of law. An order regarding conversion of a
case is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Travelers fails to
establish that review of the bankruptcy court's exercise of
discretion will materially advance the outcome of the litigation.
Instead, Travelers relies on the theory that this Court concluding
that the bankruptcy court abused its discretion will alter the
distribution of proceeds to the Debtor's creditors.

Travelers' main concern of the distribution of assets will be
closely monitored by the bankruptcy court, which alleviates any
concern that review of the interlocutory order will materially
advance the litigation. The litigation will proceed before a court
that is mindful of wasting assets regardless of whether it is a
Chapter 7 or Chapter 11. As such, the Court finds no need to review
the bankruptcy's court finding that Travelers has failed to
establish cause to convert the matter.

A full-text copy of the Court's Order dated August 20, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2CyvsC6 from Leagle.com.

Travelers Indemnity Company, Appellant, represented by Lauren
Ashley Dorsett -- laurendorsett@dwt.com  --DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE,
Nancy Anne Brownstein -- nancybrownstein@dwt.com -- DAVIS WRIGHT
TREMAINE, Filiberto Agusti , STEPTOE & JOHNSON, pro hac vice, Frank
Winston, Jr. , STEPTOE & JOHNSON, pro hac vice & Joshua Taylor ,
STEPTOE & JOHNSON, pro hac vice.

Fraser's Boiler Service Inc, Appellee, represented by Darren R.
Krattli -- dkrattli@eisenhowerlaw.com -- EISENHOWER & CARLSON &
Katrina F. Self -- kself@eisenhowerlaw.com -- EISENHOWER &
CARLSON.

Bankruptcy Appeals, Interested Party, pro se.

United States Trustee, Interested Party, represented by Sarah Rose
Flynn, US TRUSTEE'S OFFICE.

London Market Insurers, Interested Party, represented by Jessica
Bohl, DUANE MORRIS LLP & Aron Oliner, DUANE MORRIS, pro hac vice.

National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA, Interested
Party, represented by Jacquelyn A. Beatty , KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL &
Michael M. Feinberg, KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL.

            About Fraser's Boiler Service

Headquartered in Olympia, Washington, Fraser's Boiler Service,
Inc., is a boiler, tank, and shipping container manufacturer.

The Debtor sought chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No.
18-41245) on April 9, 2018, listing its estimated assets at $10
million to $50 million and estimated liabilities at $50 million to
$100 million. The petition was signed by David J. Gordon,
president.

The Debtor tapped Darren R. Krattli, Esq., of Eisenhower Carlson
PLLC, as its legal counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on May 18, 2018.


GATEWAY HOLDING: Taps FL Legal Group as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Gateway Holdings, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Florida to hire FL Legal Group as
its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services related to
its Chapter 11 case.

Niurka Asmer, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the case,
charges an hourly fee of $300.  Paralegals charge $130 per hour.
The retainer fee is $30,000, which includes the filing fee of
$1,717.  

FL Legal Group does not represent any interest adverse to the
Debtor and its estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Niurka Fernandez Asmer, Esq.
     FL Legal Group
     501 E. Kennedy, Suite 810
     Tampa, FL 33602
     Tel: 813-221-9500
     Fax: 813-341-6898
     E-mail: NFA@FLLegalGroup.com
     E-mail: NFAfilings@FLLegalGroup.com
     E-mail: Filings@FLLegalGroup.com

                    About Gateway Holdings

Gateway Holdings, LLC, filed as a single asset real estate debtor
(as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Gateway Holdings sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 18-07289) on August 29,
2018.  In the petition signed by Gagandeep S. Mangat M.D., manager,
the Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.


GREGORY JOHN TE VELDE: Milk Proceeds Not Subject to Service Lien
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned GREGORY JOHN TE VELDE Plaintiff, v. RABOBANK
N.A., et al., Defendants, Adv. No. 18-01030-A (Bankr. E.D. Cal.),
Bankruptcy Judge Fredrick E. Clement rules in favor of plaintiff
and specifies that the milk proceeds held by Columbia River
Processing in the approximate amount of $1.2 million are not
subject to the lien of ASL Lienholders.

Columbia River owes te Velde, dba, Lost Valley Farms approximately
$1.2 million for milk delivered to it. Uncertain as to whether te
Velde, the Consensual Lienholders or the ASL Holders were entitled
to those funds, Columbia River Processing impounded, and continues
to hold, those milk proceeds.

Te Velde brought an action against the Consensual Lienholders and
the ASL Holders to determine the nature, extent and validity of the
agricultural service liens. After the defendants answered, the
court bifurcated the action into two issues: (1) whether the
agricultural service liens attach to milk proceeds; and (2) all
other issues.

Oregon's non-possessory lien statutes provide persons who provide
services and suppliers who provide materials a lien against
chattels improved so improved. Among those liens are Agricultural
Services Liens, which extend to crops and animals, their
"proceeds," and, in limited instances, to the offspring of those
animals. As commonly understood, "proceeds" means monies generated
by sale. The Court analyzes whether the Agricultural Services Lien
extend to milk produced by a cow subject to such a lien.

In construing its statutes, Oregon courts place a premium on
ascertaining legislative intent and, wherever possible,
interpreting statutes consistent with that intent. In determining
intent, Oregon courts employ a three-step process. First, courts
examine the "text and context" of the statute. If legislative
intent is clear, no further inquiry is necessary. Second, courts
consider legislative history. Third, if and only if legislative
intent remains unclear after the first two levels of analysis, the
court may "resort to general maxims of statutory construction to
aid in resolving the remaining uncertainty."

Text and context reveal a legislative intent that the agricultural
services lien reaches only crops and animals, the proceeds of crops
or animals generated by their sale or similar disposition and, in
limited instances, the products of crops or animals, viz., unborn
progeny of animals that are in utero on the date a notice of lien
is filed and in the case of stud or artificial insemination
services, offspring.

Oregon Revised Statute section 87.226 expands the reach of the
agricultural services lien to collateral beyond the chattel
improved to "proceeds" and specified products, i.e., unborn, in
utero animals as of the date the notice of lien was filed and all
offspring of animals who received stud or artificial insemination
services.

The text does not support a finding that milk, or monies from its
sale, are proceeds or a product within the meaning of Oregon
Revised Statutes section 87.226. In common parlance, milk is a
product, not a proceed, and section 87.226 narrowly tailors the
circumstances in which agricultural service liens attach to
products, i.e., unborn progeny and offspring of stud/artificial
insemination services. This is not one of those circumstances. It
is also not a "proceed." Proceeds means monies generated by sale or
similar disposition. Finding the common meaning of "proceeds" and
its usage within the statue aligned, this court finds that
"proceeds" means monies generated by the sale, or similar
disposition, of the chattel subject to the lien, but not to
products, except as expressly stated.

As a result, "proceeds" as that term is used in Oregon Revised
Statutes section 87.226(1) does not attach to milk, or to the
monies generated by its sale, produced by a cow encumbered by an
Agricultural Service Lien.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum dated August 23, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2NrdFRF from Leagle.com.

Gregory John te Velde, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew P.
Bunting, Michael B. Collins & Riley C. Walter --
rileywalter@W2LG.com.

Rabobank N.A., Defendant, represented by Bennett G. Young --
Byoung@jmbm.com

J.D. Heiskell Holdings, LLC, Defendant, represented by Don J.
Pool.

Overland Stockyards, Inc., Defendant, represented by Rissa A.
Stuart .

Custom Feed Services, LLC, Defendant, represented by Stephen P.
Arnot  -- sarnot@williamskastner.com

Western AG Improvements, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig A.
Tristao.

Cold Springs Veterinary Services, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Peter L. Fear.

Scott Harvesting, LLC, Defendant, represented by John H. Chambers.

Gregory John te Velde, Counter-Defendant, pro se.

Barton Laser Leveling, Inc., Cross Defendant, pro se.

Wyatt Enterprises LLC, Cross Defendant, pro se.

                 About Gregory John te Velde

Tipton, California-based Gregory John te Velde filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 18-11651) on April 26, 2018.
Mr. te Velde does business as GJ te Velde Dairy, Pacific Rim Dairy
and Lost Valley Farm.  He formerly did business as Willow Creek
Dairy.

Judge Fredrick E. Clement oversees the bankruptcy case.

Mr. te Velde is represented by Riley C. Walter, Esq., who has an
office in Fresno, California.

In his Chapter 11 petition, the Debtor listed both assets and
liabilities between $100 million and $500 million.


GUILBEAU MARINE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Guilbeau Marine, Inc.
        P.O. Box 747
        Golden Meadow, LA 70357

Business Description: Guilbeau Marine, Inc. operates a boat rental
                      business in Cut Off, Louisiana.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 11, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Louisiana (New Orleans)

Case No.: 18-12409

Debtor's Counsel: Frederick L. Bunol, Esq.
                  THE DERBES LAW FIRM, L.L.C.
                  3027 Ridgelake Drive
                  Metairie, LA 70002
                  Tel: (504) 837-1230
                  Fax: (504) 832-0327
                  E-mail: fbunol@derbeslaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Anthony Guilbeau, Jr., president.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/laeb18-12409.pdf


HMSW CPA: Case Summary & 19 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------
Debtor: HMSW CPA, PLLC
        1010 North Center Street, Suite 100
        Arlington, TX 76011

Business Description: HMSW CPA, PLLC is a certified public
                      accounting firm in Arlington, Texas.
                      The company offers audit and assurance,
                      tax compliance, business advisory,
                      accounting and financial advisory services
                      to small and medium size businesses.  It
                      also provides a wide range of business
                      services for companies seeking to outsource
                      payroll, transaction processing and basic
                      accounting functions.  

                      http://www.hmswcpa.com/

Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 10, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Texas (Ft. Worth)

Case No.: 18-43569

Judge: Hon. Mark X. Mullin

Debtor's Counsel: Howard Marc Spector, Esq.
                  SPECTOR & JOHNSON, PLLC
                  12770 Coit Road
                  Banner Place, Suite 1100
                  Dallas, TX 75251
                  Tel: (214) 365-5377
                  Fax: (214) 237-3380
                  E-mail: hspector@spectorjohnson.com
                          hms7@cornell.edu

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Cheree D. Bishop, president and
manager.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 19 unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb18-43569_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb18-43569.pdf


HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES: Incurs $1 Million Net Loss in 3rd Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. has filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a
net loss of $1.02 million on $456.71 million of total revenues for
the three months ended July 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of
$337.20 million on $592.03 million of total revenues for the three
months ended July 31, 2017.

For the nine months ended July 31, 2018, the Company reported a net
loss of $41.65 million on $1.37 billion of total revenues compared
to a net loss of $344.03 million on $1.72 billion of total revenues
for the nine months ended July 31, 2017.

While total revenues decreased $135.3 million, homebuilding
revenues for unconsolidated joint ventures increased $131.9 million
to $194.5 million for the third quarter ended July 31, 2018,
compared with $62.6 million in last year's third quarter. During
the first nine months of fiscal 2018, homebuilding revenues for
unconsolidated joint ventures increased to $350.0 million compared
with $214.1 million in the same period of the previous year.
    
Homebuilding gross margin percentage, after cost of sales interest
expense and land charges, was 15.4% for the third quarter of fiscal
2018 compared with 12.8% in the prior year's third quarter. For the
nine months ended July 31, 2018, homebuilding gross margin
percentage, after cost of sales interest expense and land charges,
improved to 14.6% compared with 12.9% in the first nine months of
last year.
    
Homebuilding gross margin percentage, before cost of sales interest
expense and land charges, improved 160 basis points to 18.4% for
the third quarter of fiscal 2018 compared with 16.8% in the same
quarter one year ago.  During the first nine months of fiscal 2018,
homebuilding gross margin percentage, before cost of sales interest
expense and land charges, improved 120 basis points to 18.0%
compared with 16.8% in the same period of the previous year.

For the third quarter of 2018, total SG&A decreased by $7.3
million, or 11.9%, year over year.  Total SG&A was $53.9 million,
or 11.8% of total revenues, in the third quarter of fiscal 2018
compared with $61.2 million, or 10.3% of total revenues, in the
third quarter of fiscal 2017.  For the nine months ended July 31,
2018, total SG&A decreased by $4.8 million, or 2.6%, year over
year.  For the first nine months of fiscal 2018, total SG&A was
$178.0 million, or 12.9% of total revenues, compared with $182.8
million, or 10.6% of total revenues, in the first nine months of
the prior fiscal year.
    
Interest incurred (some of which was expensed and some of which was
capitalized) was $40.4 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2018
compared with $39.1 million in the same quarter one year ago. For
the nine months ended July 31, 2018, interest incurred (some of
which was expensed and some of which was capitalized) was $121.6
million compared with $116.9 million during the same nine-month
period last year.
    
Total interest expense was $38.3 million in the third quarter of
fiscal 2018 compared with $42.9 million in the third quarter of
fiscal 2017.  Total interest expense was $125.2 million for the
first nine months of fiscal 2018 compared with $126.5 million for
the first nine months of fiscal 2017.
    
Income before income taxes for the quarter ended July 31, 2018 was
$0.1 million compared with a loss before income taxes of $50.2
million during the third quarter of fiscal 2017.  For the first
nine months of fiscal 2018, the loss before income taxes was $40.0
million compared with loss of $57.5 million during the first nine
months of fiscal 2017.
    
Income before income taxes excluding land-related charges, joint
venture write-downs and loss on extinguishment of debt, was $4.4
million during the third quarter of fiscal 2018 compared with a
loss of $3.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2017.  For the
first nine months of fiscal 2018, the loss before income taxes,
excluding land-related charges, joint venture write-downs and loss
on extinguishment of debt, was $30.4 million compared with $13.4
million during the first nine months of fiscal 2017.
    
Contracts per community, including unconsolidated joint ventures,
increased 9.8% to 10.1 contracts per community for the quarter
ended July 31, 2018 compared with 9.2 contracts per community,
including unconsolidated joint ventures, in last year's third
quarter.  Consolidated contracts per community increased 6.4% to
10.0 contracts per community for the third quarter of fiscal 2018
compared with 9.4 contracts per community in the third quarter of
fiscal 2017.
    
As of the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2018, community count,
including unconsolidated joint ventures, was 143 communities, a
14.4% year-over-year decrease from 167 communities at July 31,
2017.  Consolidated community count decreased 12.8% to 123
communities as of July 31, 2018 from 141 communities at the end of
the prior year's third quarter.

The number of contracts, including unconsolidated joint ventures,
for the third quarter ended July 31, 2018, decreased 5.3% to 1,451
homes from 1,533 homes for the same quarter last year.  The number
of consolidated contracts decreased 6.4% to 1,236 homes, during the
third quarter of fiscal 2018, compared with 1,321 homes during the
third quarter of 2017.
    
During the first nine months of fiscal 2018, the number of
contracts, including unconsolidated joint ventures, was 4,407
homes, a decrease of 4.0% from 4,593 homes during the first nine
months of fiscal 2017.  The number of consolidated contracts
decreased 10.2% to 3,667 homes, during the nine month period ended
July 31, 2018, compared with 4,084 homes in the same period of the
previous year.
    
The dollar value of contract backlog, including unconsolidated
joint ventures, as of July 31, 2018, was $1.32 billion, an increase
of 2.1% compared with $1.29 billion as of July 31, 2017. The dollar
value of consolidated contract backlog, as of July 31, 2018,
decreased 9.4% to $946.5 million compared with $1.04 billion as of
July 31, 2017.
    
For the quarter ended July 31, 2018, deliveries, including
unconsolidated joint ventures, decreased 2.0% to 1,438 homes
compared with 1,467 homes during the third quarter of fiscal 2017.
Consolidated deliveries were 1,142 homes for the third quarter of
fiscal 2018, a 15.4% decrease compared with 1,350 homes during the
same quarter a year ago.
    
For the nine months ended July 31, 2018, deliveries, including
unconsolidated joint ventures, decreased 8.3% to 4,002 homes
compared with 4,362 homes in the first nine months of the prior
year.  Consolidated deliveries were 3,382 homes in the first nine
months of fiscal 2018, a 15.4% decrease compared with 3,998 homes
in the same period in fiscal 2017.
    
The contract cancellation rate, including unconsolidated joint
ventures, was 19% in the third quarter of fiscal 2018 compared with
20% during the third quarter of fiscal 2017.  The consolidated
contract cancellation rate was 19% for both the three months ended
July 31, 2018 and the three months ended July 31, 2017.
    
The valuation allowance was $659.9 million as of July 31, 2018. The
valuation allowance is a non-cash reserve against the Company's tax
assets for GAAP purposes.  For tax purposes, the tax deductions
associated with the tax assets may be carried forward for 20 years
from the date the deductions were incurred.

As of July 31, 2018, Hovnanian had $1.66 billion in total assets,
$2.16 billion in total liabilities and a total stockholders'
deficit of $500.63 million.

"We are pleased to report another quarter with year-over-year
improvements in contracts per community, a significant increase in
gross margin percentage and increases in pretax profits for our
third quarter of fiscal 2018," stated Ara K. Hovnanian, chairman of
the Board, president and chief executive officer.  "Our total
consolidated lots controlled at the end of the third quarter
expanded 20% year over year and 17% sequentially.  As we move
forward, we remain laser focused on further growing our land
position, which should ultimately lead to increases in our
community count."

"Assuming no adverse changes in current market conditions, we
continue to expect solid profitability during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2018.  Similar to what we have experienced in past cycles,
our planned community count growth should lead to improved
operating results and sustainable levels of profitability,"
concluded Mr. Hovnanian.
  
Liquidity and Inventory as of JULY 31, 2018:

   * Total liquidity at the end of the third quarter of fiscal
     2018 was $242.1 million.
    
   * In the third quarter of fiscal 2018, approximately 5,800 lots

     were put under option or acquired in 56 communities,
     including unconsolidated joint ventures.
    
   * As of July 31, 2018, consolidated lots controlled increased
     sequentially by 16.7% to 30,974 from 26,537 lots at April 30,

     2018, and increased 19.9% year over year from 25,834 lots at
     July 31, 2017.  The consolidated land position, as of
     July 31, 2018, was 30,974 lots, consisting of 18,416 lots
     under option and 12,558 owned lots.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/uBXn4p

                  About Hovnanian Enterprises

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., founded in 1959 by Kevork S. Hovnanian
and headquartered in Matawan, New Jersey, designs, constructs,
markets, and sells single-family detached homes, attached townhomes
and condominiums, urban infill, and active lifestyle homes in
planned residential developments.  The Company is a homebuilder
with operations in Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia,
Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina,
Texas, Virginia, Washington, D.C. and West Virginia.  The Company's
homes are marketed and sold under the trade names K. Hovnanian
Homes, Brighton Homes and Parkwood Builders.  As the developer of
K. Hovnanian's Four Seasons communities, the Company is also one of
the nation's largest builders of active lifestyle communities.

Hovnanian Enterprises reported a net loss of $332.2 million for the
year ended Oct. 31, 2017, a net loss of $2.81 million for the year
ended Oct. 31, 2016, and a net loss of $16.10 million for the year
ended Oct. 31, 2015.

                          *     *     *

In August 2018, Moody's Investors Service affirmed Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc.'s ratings, including its Caa1 Corporate Family
Rating.  Moody's said the rating action reflects Moody's view that
the controversy surrounding the company's financing with interest
payment restrictions and related derivatives market considerations
appears to have been resolved and risks of potential near-term
default events have somewhat subsided.

As reported by the TCR on July 11, 2018, S&P Global Ratings raised
its corporate credit rating on Red Bank, N.J.-based Hovnanian
Enterprises Inc. to 'CCC+' from 'CC'.  The rating outlook is
negative.  S&P said "The upgrade of Hovnanian reflects the
conclusion of the proposed exchange offering for any and all of its
$440 million 10% senior secured notes and $400 million 10.5% senior
secured notes."

In June 2018, Fitch Ratings upgraded Hovnanian Enterprises' Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) to 'CCC' from 'C'.  The rating action follows
the company's announcement that it has cured the default associated
with the non-payment of interest that was due on May 1, 2018 on $26
million of 8% notes due 2019 held by K. Hovnanian at Sunrise Trail
III, LLC and the withdrawal of the exchange offer of the 10% and
10.5% notes for new 3% unsecured notes.


INDUSTRIAL STEEL: Sept. 19 Plan Confirmation Hearing
----------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Thomas P. Agresti approved Industrial Steel & Pipe
Supply Company's disclosure statement, dated August 23, 2018,
explaining its chapter 11 plan.

On or before Sept. 14, 2018 is the last day for filing written
ballots by creditors, either accepting or rejecting the plan and
filing and serving written objections to confirmation of the plan.

On Sept. 19, 2018 at 12:30 P.M., a plan confirmation hearing is
scheduled in the Erie Bankruptcy Courtroom, U.S. Courthouse, 17
South Park Row, Erie, PA.

As previously reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, unsecured
creditors will recover up to 37% of their claims under the
company's proposed plan to exit Chapter 11 protection.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/pawb18-10578-110.pdf

                 About Industrial Steel

Industrial Steel & Pipe Supply Company is a wholesaler of
industrial equipment and supplies in Saint Marys, Pennsylvania.
Industrial Steel & Pipe Supply Co. filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa.
Case No. 18-10578) on June 8, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Howard S. Lepovetsky, president, the Debtor estimated $1 million to
$10 million in both assets and liabilities.  

The case is assigned to Judge Thomas P. Agresti.  Knox McLaughlin
Gornall & Sennett, P.C., led by Guy C. Fustine, is the Debtor's
counsel.  No official committee of unsecured creditors has been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


INTELLICARE NETWORK: Taps Stumbo Hanson as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Intellicare Network, LLC, sought and obtained approval from the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas to employ
the law firm of Stumbo Hanson, LLP as legal counsel for the
Debtor.

The firm's Todd A. Luckman, Tom R. Barnes II, Lee W. Hendricks and
Kathryn E. Sheedy will lead the engagement.

Stumbo Hanson will render these services:

     (a) provide the Debtor with legal advice with respect to its
powers and duties as Debtor-in-Possession in the continued
operation of the management of its property;

     (b) prepare on behalf of the Debtor the necessary
applications, answers, orders, reports and other legal papers; and

     (c) perform all other legal services for the Debtor as may be
necessary.

The hourly rates for the professionals working on the case are:

     Tom R. Barnes II            $250

     Todd A. Luckman             $250

     Lee W. Hendricks            $250

     Kathryn E. Sheedy           $200

     Other Associates            $200

     Law Clerks                  $50

The Debtor has paid the firm a case retainer of $10,000.

The Debtor requests that the court allow its attorneys' fees and
expenses to be paid on a monthly basis; specifically, that the
attorneys be paid 90% of their fees and 100% of expenses incurred
each month with all fees and expenses being subject to the final
approval of the Bankruptcy Court.

Stumbo Hanson attests that the firm represents no interest adverse
to the Debtor or the estate in the matters upon which it is to be
engaged.

Stumbo Hanson, LLP, can be reached at:

     Todd A. Luckman, Esq.
     STUMBO HANSON, LLP
     2887 S.W. MacVicar Ave.
     Topeka, KS 66611
     Tel: (785) 267-3410
     Fax: (785) 267-9516
     Email: todd@stumbolaw.com

Intellicare Network, LLC sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 18-40856) on July 13, 2018, listing under
$500,000 in assets and $500,001 to $1 million in liabilities.
Judge Janice Miller Karlin oversees the case.

The United States Trustee has advised the Court it was unable to
appoint an official creditors' committee due to inadequate
responses from the 20 largest creditors.



J & M SALES: Taps Imperial Capital as Investment Banker
-------------------------------------------------------
J & M Sales Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware to hire Imperial Capital, LLC as its
investment banker.

The firm will conduct a financial valuation of the ongoing
operations of the company and its affiliates; assist the Debtors in
developing, structuring and negotiating a potential restructuring
plan, financing or sale transaction; and provide other financial
advisory services related to their Chapter 11 cases.

Imperial Capital will be compensated according to this fee
arrangement: (i) a monthly advisory fee of $100,000, payable
monthly in advance; (ii) $1 million fee, payable in cash upon the
closing of a restructuring; (iii) a sale transaction fee consisting
of 1% of the consideration received by the Debtors or their equity
security holders, payable in cash at closing; and a financing fee,
payable from the proceeds of the new financing at closing, equal to
1% of the face amount of any new first lien ABL debt as part of the
financing, or no fee if a financing transaction with Pathlight
Capital LLC is consummated.

Marc Bilbao, managing director of Imperial Capital, disclosed in a
court filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as defined
in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Imperial Capital can be reached through:

     Marc Bilbao
     Imperial Capital, LLC
     10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2400
     Los Angeles, CA 90067
     Office: (310) 246-3700
     Toll Free: (800) 929-2299
     Fax: (310) 777-3000

                       About National Stores

National Stores is a 344-store chain in 22 U.S. states and Puerto
Rico.  National Stores currently does business as Fallas, Fallas
Paredes, Fallas Discount Stores, Factory 2-U, Anna's Linen's by
Fallas, and Falas (spelled with single "l" in Puerto Rico).
Fallas, which emplolys 9,800 people, is a discount retailer
offering value-priced merchandise, including apparel, bedding and
household supplies.  The brands of National Stores are located in
retail plazas, specialty centers, and downtown areas to serve the
communities its customers and staff members call home.

National Stores, Inc., and its affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection and Aug. 6, 2018, and announced that Hilco Merchant
Resources, LLC, is conducting going-out-of-business sales for 74
stores.  The lead case is In re J & M Sales Inc. (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 18-11801).  J & M Sales estimated assets and debt of
$100 million to $500 million as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as bankruptcy
co-counsel; Retail Consulting Services, Inc. as real estate
advisor; Imperial Capital, LLC as investment banker; and Prime
Clerk LLC as the claims and noticing agent.  SierraConstellation
Partners, LLC is providing personnel to serve as chief
restructuring officer and support staff.


J.P. QUESOS: Taps Realty Executives as Real Estate Broker
---------------------------------------------------------
J.P. Quesos San Miguel, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to hire a real
estate broker.

The Debtor proposes to employ Realty Executives RGV in connection
with the sale of its commercial property located at 2041 Amistad
Drive, San Benito, Cameron County, Texas.

The firm will receive 6% of the sales price.

Romayeo Esparza, a realtor employed with Realty Executives,
disclosed in a court filing that his firm does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor's estate.

Realty Executives can be reached through:

     Romayeo R. Esparza
     Realty Executives RGV
     805 I-J Ave.
     McAllen, TX 78501
     Tel: (956) 971-8989

                 About J.P. Quesos San Miguel LLC

J.P. Quesos San Miguel, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 18-10121) on April
30, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it
had estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of
less than $1 million.  Judge Eduardo V. Rodriguez presides over the
case.  The Debtor tapped Marcos D. Oliva, P.C. as its legal
counsel.


JAZPAL LLC: Taps David W. Cohen as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------
Jazpal, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland to hire the Law Offices of David W. Cohen as
its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; negotiate with creditors; and provide other legal
services related to its Chapter 11 case.

Cohen will charge an hourly fee of $275.  The firm received from
the Debtor a retainer of $10,000, plus the filing fee of $1,717.

David Cohen, Esq., sole proprietor of the firm, disclosed in a
court filing that he is a "disinterested person" as defined in
section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     David W. Cohen, Esq.
     Law Offices of David W. Cohen
     One North Charles Street, Suite 350
     Baltimore, MD 21201
     Phone: 410-837-6340  
     Fax: 410-347-7889

                         About Jazpal LLC

Jazpal, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-21681) on September 4, 2018.  At
the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets and debt of $1
million to $10 million.  Judge David E. Rice presides over the
case.


JC FITS: Seeks Approval on 2nd PBC Cash Collateral Stipulation
--------------------------------------------------------------
JC Fits Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California of its Second Cash Collateral
Stipulation with secured creditor Prime Business Credit, Inc.
("PBC") regarding the Debtor's interim use of cash collateral.

Previously, in December 2017, the Debtor and PBC entered into their
first cash collateral stipulation, which covered the period up to
March 31, 2018.  It was approved by the Court.

As set forth in the Stipulation, PBC has a first priority blanket
lien on all of Debtor's assets including cash. Prepetition, the
Debtor obtained a loan from PBC. The Debtor's loan from PBC had a
balance of approximately $199,962, which is secured by all of
Debtor's assets, including inventory and sales income. The loan
matured on June 20, 2017 and was extended to June 2018.  As of June
2018, the total outstanding principal balance on the amended loan
was $200,000.

Under the loan with PBC, the Debtor is required to make interest
payments to PBC through a Factoring Agreement whereby Debtor's
accounts receivables are collected by PBC, PBC then deducts
interest payments and forwards the balance of accounts receivables
to Debtor.  The Debtor and PBC operated under this factoring
arrangement prepetition and continue to operate under this
arrangement postpetition.  The Debtor has sufficient income to
continue operating under this factoring arrangement.

PBC consents to Debtor's use of cash collateral up to the amount
and for the specific purposes set forth in the Budget for the
period from April 1, 2018 through Oct. 29, 2018, or such later date
as may be agreed to pursuant to a written stipulation entered into
by and between the Debtor and PBC and approved by the Court.

As and for adequate protection of PBC's interest in and consent to
Debtor's use of the cash collateral and as security for Debtor's
performance under the Stipulation, the Debtor will allow PBC to
continue to collect regular monthly interest payments under the
terms of the of the Note as amended by the Second Amendment to the
Note in the sum of $2,000 plus fees and/or interest accrued for
each month beginning July 31, 2018 through and including July 31,
2019.

In consideration of PBC's consent to Debtor's use of cash
collateral as set forth in the Stipulation:

     (a) PBC is granted a replacement lien on rents, proceeds and
profits of the post-petition assets of the Debtor having the same
extent, validity and priority PBC had in the prepetition collateral
on the Petition Date.

     (b) If the replacement lien is insufficient to satisfy in full
the claims of PBC, PBC will be granted an allowed claim under
Section 503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code in the amount of any such
insufficiency.  Such claims will have the super-priority provided
by Section 7(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, and no claim for costs or
expenses of administration that have been or may be incurred in
this case, any conversion of this case to a case under Chapter 7,
or otherwise, and no priority claims, are or will be senior to or
on parity with any such claim of PBC, except only to fees payable
to the U.S. Trustee and fees or costs owing to the Clerk of the
Court.

In order to provide further adequate protection to PBC for Debtor's
use of cash collateral, the Debtor:

     (a) will permit PBC and its agents access to inspect the
pre-petition collateral;

     (b) will keep the pre-petition collateral insured as required
by the agreements including lease agreements and U.S. Trustee
Guidelines.

     (c) will provide a report of the Debtor's cash flow on a
monthly basis or as reasonable requested by PBC.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at

               http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-21123-95.pdf

                         About JC Fits

JC Fits Inc. is in the business of selling wholesale garments and
its assets consist primarily of garment inventory, which it sells
to its wholesale customers.  The sales revenue from this sale
business is the sole source of the Company's income.

JC Fits, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 17-21123) on Sept. 12, 2017.  In the petition signed
by Jeong H. Choi, president, the Debtor disclosed total assets of
$588,500 and total liabilities of $1.56 million.  The Hon. Robert
N. Kwan presides over the case.  Joon M. Khang, Esq., of Khang &
Khang, LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


JONES ENERGY: Effects 1-for-20 Reverse Common Stock Split
---------------------------------------------------------
In connection with the previously announced 1-for-20 reverse stock
split of shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per
share, of Jones Energy, Inc. and Class B common stock, par value
$0.001 per share, of the Company, the Company has filed an
amendment to its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.  The
Amendment, effective as of 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on Sept.
7, 2018, converted each 20 issued and outstanding Class A Shares
into one Class A Share and each 20 issued and outstanding Class B
Shares into one Class B Share.  A Certificate of Correction to the
Amendment correcting the cash payout process for fractional shares
resulting from the Reverse Stock Split was filed with the Secretary
of State of the State of Delaware on Sept. 10, 2018.  Pursuant to
the Certificate of Correction, any fraction of a share of Common
Stock that would otherwise have resulted from the Reverse Stock
Split will be settled by cash payment, equal to the fraction of one
share of Common Stock multiplied by the average of the high and low
trading prices of the Class A Shares on the New York Stock Exchange
during regular trading hours for the five trading days immediately
preceding Sept. 7, 2018.

The Reverse Stock Split affected all record holders of Common Stock
uniformly and did not affect any record holder's percentage
ownership interest in the Company, except for de minimis changes as
a result of the elimination of fractional shares.  The Reverse
Stock Split reduced the number of Class A Shares outstanding from
98,039,826 (excluding treasury shares) to 4,901,986 and the number
of Class B Shares outstanding from 4,825,038 to 241,251.  The
Reverse Stock Split will not affect the authorized number of shares
for the Common Stock.

The Class A Shares began trading on a reverse split-adjusted basis
on the NYSE at the opening of trading on Sept. 10, 2018.  The Class
A Shares will continue trading on the NYSE under the symbol "JONE"
with a new CUSIP number (48019R 306).  The holders of Common Stock
who hold in "street name" in their brokerage accounts do not have
to take any action as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.  Their
accounts will be automatically adjusted to reflect the number of
shares owned.


All outstanding equity awards, pursuant to the various instruments
governing them, will be adjusted immediately prior to the Reverse
Stock Split by dividing the number of shares of Common Stock into
which such equity awards are exercisable or convertible by 20.  In
connection with such proportionate adjustments, the number of
shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise or conversion of
outstanding equity awards will be rounded down to the nearest whole
share.

The Reverse Stock Split did not affect the number of authorized or
outstanding shares of the Company's 8.0% Series A Perpetual
Convertible Preferred Stock or the dividend rate per share of any
outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock.  In accordance with
the Certificate of Designations governing the Series A Preferred
Stock, the conversion rate of the Series A Preferred Stock has been
adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split and is currently equal
to 0.8534.

The Reverse Stock Split followed (i) the approval by the Company's
stockholders at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 22,
2018 of a grant of discretionary authority to the Board of
Directors of the Company to effect an amendment to the Company's
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a
reverse stock split of the Common Stock, at a ratio between 1-for-5
and 1-for-20, with such ratio to be determined by the Board in its
sole discretion and (ii) the approval by the Board of the specific
1-for-20 reverse stock split ratio on Aug. 17, 2018.  The voting
results from the Annual Meeting and the stockholder approval of the
Reverse Stock Split proposal were disclosed in a Current Report on
Form 8-K filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 23, 2018.

                       About Jones Energy

Austin, Texas-based Jones Energy, Inc. --
http://www.jonesenergy.com/-- is an independent oil and natural
gas company engaged in the development and acquisition of oil and
natural gas properties in the Anadarko basin of Oklahoma and Texas.
The Company's Chairman, Jonny Jones, founded its predecessor
company in 1988 in continuation of his family's long history in the
oil and gas business, which dates back to the 1920s.

Jones Energy reported a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $109.41 million in 2017, a net loss attributable to
common shareholders of $45.22 million in 2016, and a net loss
attributable to common shareholders of $2.38 million in 2015.  As
of June 30, 2018, Jones Energy had $1.85 billion in total assets,
$1.26 billion in total liabilities, $91.53 million in series A
preferred stock, and $504.93 million in total stockholders'
equity.

                         NYSE Noncompliance

On March 23, 2018, the New York Stock Exchange notified the Company
that it was noncompliant with certain continued listing standards
because the price of the Company's Class A common stock over a
period of 30 consecutive trading days had fallen below $1.00 per
share, which is the minimum average closing price per share
required to maintain a listing on the NYSE.  The Company now has a
six-month cure period to regain compliance.


K COLBERT CAPITAL: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: K Colbert Capital LLC
        23740 Hawthorne Blvd
        Torrance, CA 90505

Business Description: K Colbert Capital LLC filed as a Single
                      Asset Real Estate Debtor (as defined in 11
                      U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  K Colbert is the
                      fee simple owner of a 19-unit apartment
                      building located at 10412 Figueroa Street,
                      Los Angeles, CA 90003 with an appraised
                      value of $3.5 million.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 10, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Case No.: 18-20543

Judge: Hon. Barry Russell

Debtor's Counsel: Andrew Moher, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW MOHER
                  5560 La Jolla Blvd, Suite D
                  La Jolla, CA 92037
                  Tel: 619-269-6204
                  Fax: 619-923-3303
                  E-mail: amoher@moherlaw.com

Total Assets: $3,500,200

Total Liabilities: $1,805,000

The petition was signed by Ken Colbert, managing member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's two unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-20543.pdf


KAI INDUSTRIES: Trustee Taps Levene, Neale as Bankruptcy Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Heide Kurtz, the Chapter 11 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of
Kai Industries, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Central District of California to retain Levene, Neale,
Bender, Yoo & Brill L.L.P. as general bankruptcy counsel, effective
as of Sept. 4, 2018.

Services LNBY will render are:

     a. advise the Trustee with regard to the requirements of the
Bankruptcy Court, Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules and the United
States Trustee as they pertain to the Trustee;

     b. advise the Trustee with regard to certain rights and
remedies of the bankruptcy estate and the rights, claims and
interests of creditors;

     c. represent the Trustee in any proceeding or hearing in the
Bankruptcy Court involving the bankruptcy estate unless the Trustee
is represented in such proceeding or hearing by other special
counsel;

     d. conduct examinations of witnesses, claimants or adverse
parties and representing the Trustee in any adversary proceeding
except to the extent that any such adversary proceeding is in an
area outside of LNBYB's expertise or which is beyond LNBYB's
staffing capabilities;

     e. prepare and assist the Trustee in the preparation of
reports, applications, pleadings and orders including, but not
limited to objections to claims, settlements and other matters
relating to the case;

     f. investigate, evaluate, and prosecute objections to claims
as may be appropriate; and

     g. perform any other services which may be appropriate in
LNBYB's representation of the Trustee during the Debtor's
bankruptcy case.

Timothy J. Yoo, partner of the law firm of Levene, Neale, Bender,
Yoo & Brill L.L.P., attests that LNBYB does not hold or represent
any interest adverse to the Trustee, the Debtor or her estate, and
LNBYB is a "disinterested person" as that term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

LNYB'S hourly rates are:

     David W. Levene            $595
     David L. Neale                 595
     Ron Bender                     595
     Martin J. Brill                595
     Timothy J. Yoo                 595
     Gary E. Klausner               595
     Edward M. Wolkowitz            595
     David B. Golubchik             595
     Beth Ann R. Young              580
     Monica Y. Kim                  580
     Daniel H. Reiss                580
     Irving M. Gross                580
     Philip A. Gasteier             580
     Eve H. Karasik      580
     Todd A. Frealy       580
     Kurt Ramlo       580
     Jacqueline L. Rodriguez      565
     Juliet Y. Oh       565
     Todd M. Arnold              565
     Carmela T. Pagay             565
     Anthony A. Friedman     565
     Krikor J. Meshefejian      565
     John-Patrick M. Fritz      565
     Lindsey L. Smith      495
     Jeffrey Kwong       425
     Paraprofessionals              250

The counsel can be reached through:

     Timothy J. Yoo, Esq.
     LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, YOO & BRILL L.L.P.
     10250 Constellation Boulevard, Ste. 1700
     Los Angeles, CA 90067
     Tel: (310) 229-1234
     Fax: (310) 229-1244
     Email: tjy@lnbyb.com

                     About Kai Industries

Based in Irwindale, California, Kai Industries, LLC, provides
property maintenance, rent collection, and utilities management
services to the real estate market.

Kai Industries sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-11152) on Feb. 1, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Brad Lin, managing member, the Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Vincent
P. Zurzolo presides over the case.  Law Offices of Louis J. Esbin
is the Debtor's counsel.

Heide Kurtz was appointed as the estate's Chapter 11 Trustee.


KARA HOMES: Condo Assoc. Claims Accrued Prior to Plan Confirmation
------------------------------------------------------------------
Appellant Madison Crossing at Birch Hill Condominium Association,
Inc. in the case captioned In Re: Kara Homes, Inc. MADISON CROSSING
AT BIRCH HILL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. MADISON
CROSSING AT BIRCH HILL, LCC, Appellee, Civil Action No. 17-3981-BRM
(D.N.J.) appeals from the Bankruptcy Court's order denying the
Association's motion for a determination that its construction
defect claims against Respondent Madison Crossing at Birch Hill,
LLC are not barred by the Kara Homes, Inc.'s confirmed Chapter 11
bankruptcy plan. Upon deliberation, District Judge Brian R.
Martinotti denies the Association's appeal and affirms the
Bankruptcy Court’s order.

The Court answers whether the Bankruptcy Court erred in ruling the
successor liability claims are barred because the association knew
of the construction defect prior to the debtor's confirmation plan
and failing to determine that the applicable statute of limitations
did not begin to run until the transition period commenced in
2013.

The Association argues the six-year statute of limitations did not
begin to run until transition occurred. Specifically, the
Association argues "the construction defect claims of the
Association only accrued when transition commenced in 2013."
Further, the Association argues the Bankruptcy Court erred in
ruling the Association had the requisite knowledge of the
construction defects prior to the 2007 confirmed bankruptcy plan.
Respondent argues the Association knew or should have known of the
construction defect claims prior to the 2007 confirmed bankruptcy
plan, and therefore the Association's claims accrued prior to
confirmation and were properly discharged by the Bankruptcy Court.


Here, the Bankruptcy Court correctly ruled the Association's claims
accrued before the 2007 confirmed bankruptcy plan, and therefore
the Association's construction defects claim is discharged. As an
initial matter, the Association misinterprets the holding in
Palisades, arguing the New Jersey Supreme Court held "claims
against the contractors begins to run six years from the later of
either substantial completion of the contractor's work or when the
'owner' knows or should have known of the existence of the claim."
Rather, the New Jersey Supreme Court held the statute of
repose--triggered by substantial completion--and the accrual
statute of limitations--triggered by the discovery rule--serve as
two distinct statutory bars against bringing a claim.

The court finds the Bankruptcy Court's legal findings were
correctly reached and applied. First, the Bankruptcy Court
correctly determined the date of accrual triggers the statute of
limitations to run. Second, the Bankruptcy Court correctly
determined the discovery rule applies in the context of
construction defect claims. Third, the Bankruptcy Court correctly
applied the discovery rule, finding "the Association's claim is
deemed to have accrued when the Association knew or should have
known of its injury. Significantly, in reaching these legal
conclusions, the Bankruptcy Court correctly determined if the
Association's claims accrued prior to the 2007 confirmed bankruptcy
plan, then the Association's claim must be discharged under the
bankruptcy code.

The Association also argues the Bankruptcy Court erred in ruling
the Association had the authority and capacity to initiate its
state law action prior to the 2007 confirmation of the Kara Homes,
Inc. Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan. Specifically, the Association
argues it could not maintain a construction defect claim against
the developers until transition passed control of the Association's
governing board from the developers to the unit owners.

The Court is not persuaded the Association lacked the authority and
capacity to protect its own interest. During the bankruptcy
proceeding's pendency, the Association retained its own counsel and
hired an engineering firm to perform non-invasive inspections of
several units. Moreover, the Association participated in the
bankruptcy proceeding, filed objection to Kara Homes, Inc. Master
Disclosure Statement and to the Global Agreement entered into by
the Debtor and a secured creditor. Although the Court acknowledges
the Association's governing board comprised of unit owners was only
temporary until a new developer bought the rights to the
Development Project, during that temporary period, the Association
did in fact have de facto transfer in control with the authority
and capacity to protect their interests. Accordingly, the
Bankruptcy Court correctly ruled the Association had the authority
and capacity to initiate a state law action.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion dated August 24, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2Ocg9jO from Leagle.com.

MADISON CROSSING AT BIRCH HILL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.,
Appellant, represented by ANDREW J. KELLY  --  akelly@kbtlaw.com --
KELLY & BRENNAN, PC.

MADISON CROSSING AT BIRCH HILL, LLC, Appellee, represented by
DOUGLAS GORDON LENEY  -- dleney@archerlaw.com -- ARCHER & GREINER
PC.

Community Association Institute, Amicus, represented by MARTIN
CARLO CABALAR, BECKER & POLIAKOFF LLP.

                About Kara Homes Inc.

Headquartered in East Brunswick, New Jersey, Kara Homes Inc., aka
Kara Homes Development LLC, builds single-family homes,
condominiums, town homes, and active-adult communities.  The
company filed for chapter 11 protection on Oct. 5, 2006 (Bankr.
D.N.J. Case No. 06-19626).  On Oct. 9, 2006, nine affiliates filed
separate chapter 11 petitions in the same Bankruptcy Court.  On
Oct. 10, 2006, 12 more affiliates filed chapter 11 petitions. On
June 8, 2007, 20 more affiliates filed separate chapter 11
petitions.

David L. Bruck, Esq., at Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, et al.,
represented the Debtors.  Michael D. Sirota, Esq., at Cole, Schotz,
Meisel, Forman & Leonard represented the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors.  Traxi LLC served as the Debtors' crisis
manager.  The Debtors engaged Perry M. Mandarino as chief
restructuring officer, and Anthony Pacchia as chief financial
officer.  When Kara Homes filed for protection from its creditors,
it listed total assets of $350,179,841 and total debts of
$296,840,591.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on October 5, 2007,
the Hon. Michael B. Kaplan confirmed Kara Homes Inc. and its
debtor-affiliates' Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.

Kenneth Baum, Esq., at Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard,
P.A., represents Bernard A. Katz, the Liquidating Trustee under the
Plan.


KHADER KAMAL AZZOUZ: Loses Lawsuit vs. Annab
--------------------------------------------
Plaintiff Khader Azzouz in the case captioned Khader Kamal Azzouz
and Nannette Azzouz, Plaintiffs, v. Annab, Inc., Defendant,  Adv.
Proc. No. 16-01117-KHK (Bankr. E.D. Va.) filed a complaint gainst
Annab, Inc. for breach of contract, actual fraud and fraud in the
inducement. Annab, the Defendant, asserts the Azzouz's claims are
barred by the doctrine of unclean hands, setoff, Azzouz's failure
to mitigate, and ultimately that Azzouz suffered no damages.

Upon careful analysis, Bankruptcy Judge Klinette H. Kindred enters
a judgment in favor of the Defendant in all counts.

Azzouz seeks a judgment of $90,000 reflecting the purchase price
under the Asset Purchase Agreement, a judgment in the amount of
$40,000 for additional damages that are alleged to be the direct
result of the Defendant's breach of warranty and fraud, and
punitive damages in the amount of $350,000 dollars as a result of
the Defendant's alleged fraud. The Plaintiff, in essence, seeks
rescission of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the underlying
promissory note and the guaranty.

Here, neither party disputes that a contract was formed, as both
parties assert breaches of this contract. The Court will assume
without deciding that the relevant warranties were breached;
however, the Plaintiff's claim fails because the Court finds that
the Plaintiff has failed to establish damages flowing from the
breach of these warranties. The Plaintiff conceded at trial that he
incurred no liability nor did he have to make any payments in
connection with the alleged breaches of warranties. Further, the
Plaintiff also conceded that his operation of the business was not
interrupted by the alleged breaches of warranty. Accordingly, the
Plaintiff's request for relief is denied for failure to prove with
reasonable certainty, any alleged damages that were suffered as a
result of the alleged breaches. As a result, the Court enters
judgment for the Defendant on this count.

"A cause of action for actual fraud requires the plaintiff to
prove: (1) a false representation, (2) of a material fact, (3) made
intentionally and knowingly, (4) with intent to mislead, (5)
reliance by the party misled, and (6) resulting damage to the party
misled."

The Plaintiff's testimony establishes that at the latest, on March
6, 2014, he knew that the Defendant was not properly reporting
sales to the IRS. The Plaintiff executed the APA in April of 2014.
"[I]n circumstances where a prudent buyer would haveconducted an
investigation and, thereby, discovered the seller's misstatement, a
buyer who fails to make such an investigation may not assert fraud
based on the factual misrepresentation." As a result, the Court
finds that the Plaintiff had knowledge of the Defendant's practice
of underreporting to the IRS. The Court further finds that this
information would excite the suspicions of a reasonably prudent
person who was concerned about liabilities to the IRS.

Therefore, the Court finds that the Plaintiff's reliance on the
Defendant's representations regarding tax liabilities was
unreasonable given the Plaintiff's knowledge that the Defendant was
underreporting sales to the IRS and "pocket[ing] the difference."
Thus, the Court declines to address the remaining elements of the
actual fraud claim, and will enter judgment for the Defendant on
this count.

The Plaintiff's fraud in the inducement claim fails for the same
reason the actual fraud claim fails -- the Plaintiff's reliance was
not reasonable given his knowledge of the Defendant's
underreporting to the IRS. The Court will, therefore, enter
judgment for the Defendant on this count.

The Plaintiff asserts that he had a right to rescind and asserted
that right, pursuant to the APA's study period provision in
combination with the Default provision. However, APA Section
4(A)(xi) does not seem to provide for rescission of the contract.
The study period provision clearly states that "in the events a
discrepancy is found after possession that seller will be held
liable for such discrepancy." As previously noted, the Plaintiff
did not incur any liability as a result of the alleged breaches of
any of the warranties under paragraph four of the APA. Thus, the
study period provision is not the source of a rescission right. The
Plaintiff cannot assert a rescission of the contract while
continuing to enjoy the benefits he received under it.

Accordingly, the Court enters judgment for the Defendant on all
counts. As a result the Court declines to address the Defendant's
Affirmative Defenses. Further, because the Plaintiff failed to
demonstrate a right to compensatory relief, the Court sees no basis
to award punitive damages.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated August 17,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2wVhdkS from Leagle.com.

Khader Kamal Azzouz & Nannette Azzouz, Plaintiffs, represented by
James P. Campbell -- JCampbell@CampbellFlannery.com -- Campbell
Flannery, P.C.

Annab, Inc., Defendant, represented by Michael Mitry Hadeed, Jr.,
Hadeed Law Group, PC.

The bankruptcy case is In re: Khader Kamal Azzouz and Nannette,
Azzouz, (Chapter 11), Debtors, Case No. 15-12559-KHK (Bankr. E.D.
Va.).


KSA INVESTMENTS: Ch. 11 Trustee Taps Offit Kurman as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Marc H. Baer, Chapter 11 Trustee of KSA Investments, LLC, sought
and obtained authority from the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division, to employ the law
firm of Offit Kurman, P.A. as his general counsel.

Kurman will perform these services:

     a. investigate and liquidate the Debtor's equity interests in
all property of the estate;

     b. investigate and pursue causes of action as directed by the
Chapter 11 Trustee, including actions for turnover or avoidance
actions under Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code;

     c. assist the Chapter 11 Trustee with examining proofs of
claim and objecting to the allowance of any claim where a purpose
would be served in doing so;

     d. prepare any necessary applications, answers, orders,
reports and other legal papers, and appearing on the Chapter 11
Trustee's behalf in proceedings instituted by or against the
Chapter 11 Trustee or the bankruptcy estate; and

     e. perform other legal services for the Chapter 11 Trustee
which may be necessary and beneficial to the Bankruptcy Estate.

The firm's customary hourly rates are:

     Partners                  $330 - $475
     Associates                $225 - $330
     Paraprofessionals          $75 - $185

Joseph J. Bellinger attests that his firm and its professionals
have no connection with the Debtor, creditors of the Debtor or any
other party in interest, their respective attorneys and
accountants, the United States trustee or any person employed in
the office of the United States trustee.

Offit Kurman, P.A. can be reached at:

     Joseph J. Bellinger, Esq.
     Offit Kurman, P.A.
     300 E. Lombard Street, Suite 2010
     Baltimore, MD 21202
     Tel: (410) 209-6415
     E-mail: jbellinger@offitkurman.com

                      About KSA Investments

KSA Investments, LLC, owner of five rental properties located in
Baltimore City, Maryland, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Md. Case No. 18-13303) on March 14, 2018.  In the petition signed
by its member Kamina Samie, the Debtor estimated $100,000 to
$500,000 in assets and liabilities.  The Law Offices of E.
Christopher Amos serves as counsel to the Debtor.

Marc Baer was later appointed as the Chapter 11 trustee to oversee
the bankruptcy estate.  He has Investors Management Co., Inc. as
property manager.



LENNAR CORP: CACC Suit Stayed Anew Pending Resolution of Bnkr. Case
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Upon the stipulation for stay made by and between Relator Citizens
Against Corporate Crime, LLC and defendant Lennar Corporation,
District Judge Troy L. Nunley stays the case captioned Citizens
Against Corporate Crime, LLC, as Relator, Plaintiff, v. Lennar
Corporation and Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants, Case
No.
2:18-cv-01269-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal.) pending resolution of Delaware
bankruptcy proceedings.

On May 31, 2018, the parties filed a joint stipulation requesting a
stay of proceedings pending resolution of Lennar's Motion to Reopen
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Cases for the Limited Purpose of
Enforcing the Injunction and Release in the Debtors' Joint Chapter
11 Plan and Confirmation Order which was filed in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on May 18, 2018 in
the matter captioned In re LandSource Communities Development LLC,
Case No. 08-1111 (Bankr. D. Del.).

On June 5, 2018, the Court entered an Order granting the parties'
joint request for a stay and providing that all deadlines in these
proceedings were stayed pending resolution by the bankruptcy court
of Lennar's Motion to Reopen.

On July 17, 2018, the Honorable Kevin J. Carey of the Delaware
Bankruptcy Court entered an order granting Lennar's Motion to
Reopen and instructing Lennar to file its Motion to Enforce the
Injunction and Release in the Debtors' Joint Chapter 11 Plan and
Confirmation Order.

The Delaware Bankruptcy Court has set a hearing on Lennar's
Enforcement Motion for October 24, 2018.

The parties agree it would save judicial resources and avoid the
risk of inconsistent results in parallel proceedings to allow the
Delaware Bankruptcy Court an opportunity to hear and rule on
Lennar's Enforcement Motion before proceedings in the Court should
proceed.

A copy of the Joint Stipulation dated August 16, 2018 is available
at https://bit.ly/2M4pkkl from Leagle.com.

Citizens Against Corporate Crime, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability
company, Plaintiff, represented by Robert Edward Barnes --
barneslaw@barneslawllp -- Barnes Law & Vincent Renda, Renda Law
Offices, PC.

Lennar Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant, represented
by Daniel M. Petrocelli  -- dpetrocelli@omm.com -- O'Melveny and
Myers LLP, Megan K. Smith -- megansmith@omm.com -- O'Melveny and
Myers LLP & David Marroso -- dmarroso@omm.com -- O'Melveny and
Myers LLP.

                  About Lennar Corp.

Based in Miami, Florida, Lennar Corporation (NYSE: LEN and LEN.B)
-- http://www.lennar.com/-- founded in 1954, builds affordable,
move-up and retirement homes primarily under the Lennar brand name.
Lennar's Financial Services segment provides mortgage financing,
title insurance, and closing services for both buyers of the
company's homes and others.


MACK-CALI REALTY: Moody's Cuts Preferred Shelf Rating to (P)Ba3
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the preferred shelf rating
of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation to (P)Ba3 from (P)Ba2 following the
publication of the updated Rating Methodology for REITs and Other
Commercial Real Estate Firms.

The following rating was downgraded:

Mack-Cali Realty Corporation

Preferred shelf to (P)Ba3 from (P)Ba2

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rating action reflects the revised notching for preferred stock
issued by REITs with senior unsecured ratings of Ba1 and lower such
that the preferred instruments would be rated two notches below the
issuer's senior unsecured debt rating. Previously, the two-notch
differential was applied for issuers with senior unsecured ratings
at Ba3 or lower and preferred securities for higher rated issuers
were rated one notch below the senior unsecured rating.

Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (NYSE: CLI) is an office REIT that
owns 15.5 million square feet of office space, primarily in New
Jersey. The REIT also owns and has interests in 17 operating
multi-family properties in New Jersey, Massachusetts and Washington
DC. The REIT's primary subsidiary is Mack-Cali Realty L.P., senior
unsecured rating of Ba1 with a negative outlook.
The negative rating outlook reflects the Mack-Cali's modest
liquidity position relative to its large development pipeline and
sustained weakness in its office portfolio lease rate.
A return to stable outlook would require net debt to EBITDA below
7.5x, secured leverage below 20% and fixed charge at 2.7x or
higher, all on a sustained basis. Unencumbered asset ratio above
60% on a consistent basis, share of income from the multifamily
segment at 25% or more and ample liquidity to manage all its
funding needs over the next 12 months are some other factors that
could provide upward rating momentum.

The ratings will be downgraded if fixed charge coverage drops below
2.2x, net debt to EBITDA is above 8.5x on a sustained basis and the
unencumbered assets ratio is lower than 40%. Deterioration in
portfolio lease rate, or liquidity challenges could also result in
a rating downgrade.

The principal methodology used in this rating was REITs and Other
Commercial Real Estate Firms published in September 2018.


MARRONE BIO: Waddell & Reed Reports 25.1% Stake
-----------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. and Ivy Investment
Management Company disclosed that as of Aug. 31, 2018, they
beneficially own 28,714,892 shares of common stock of Marrone Bio
Innovations, Inc., which constitutes 25.1 percent of the shares
outstanding.

The securities reported are beneficially owned by one or more
open-end investment companies or other managed accounts which are
advised or sub-advised by Ivy Investment Management Company
("IICO"), an investment advisory subsidiary of Waddell & Reed
Financial, Inc.  The investment advisory contracts grant IICO all
investment and/or voting power over securities owned by those
advisory clients.  The investment sub-advisory contracts grant IICO
investment power over securities owned by such sub-advisory clients
and, in most cases, voting power.  Any investment restriction of a
sub-advisory contract does not restrict investment discretion or
power in a material manner.  Therefore, IICO may be deemed the
beneficial owner of the securities covered by this statement under
Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                    https://is.gd/WxwAg6

                About Marrone Bio Innovations

Based in Davis, California, Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. --
http://www.marronebio.com/-- discovers, develops and sells
innovative biological products for crop protection, plant health
and waterway systems treatment.  MBI has screened over 18,000
microorganisms and 350 plant extracts, leveraging its in-depth
knowledge of plant and soil microbiomes enhanced by advanced
molecular technologies to rapidly develop seven effective and
environmentally responsible pest management products to help
customers operate more sustainably while uniquely improving plant
health and increasing crop yields.  Supported by a robust portfolio
of over 400 issued and pending patents around its superior natural
product chemistry, MBI's currently available commercial products
are Regalia, Grandevo, Venerate, Majestene, Haven Stargus and
Amplitude, Zelto and Zequanox.

The Company incurred a net loss of $30.92 million in 2017 and a net
loss of $31.07 million in 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Marrone Bio
had $55.14 million in total assets, $33.17 million in total
liabilities and $21.96 million in total stockholders' equity.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm  Ernst &
Young LLP, the Company's auditor since 2008, on the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, includes an
explanatory paragraph stating that the Company's historical
operating results and negative working capital indicate substantial
doubt exists about the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern.


MELINTA THERAPEUTICS: FMR LLC Has 5.6% Stake as of Sept. 7
----------------------------------------------------------
FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Sept. 7, 2018, that
they beneficially own 3,139,262 shares of common stock of Melinta
Therapeutics Inc., which constitutes 5.604 percent of the shares
outstanding.

Abigail P. Johnson is a director, the chairman and the chief
executive officer of FMR LLC.  Members of the Johnson family,
including Ms. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or
through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR LLC,
representing 49% of the voting power of FMR LLC.  The Johnson
family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into
a shareholders' voting agreement under which all Series B voting
common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of
Series B voting common shares.  Accordingly, through their
ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the
shareholders' voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may
be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a
controlling group with respect to FMR LLC.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                   https://is.gd/8Txcwz

                   About Melinta Therapeutics

New Haven, Connecticut-based Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. --
http://www.melinta.com/-- is a commercial-stage pharmaceutical
company focused on discovering, developing and commercializing
differentiated anti-infectives for the hospital and select
non-hospital, or community, settings that address the need for
effective treatments for infections due to resistant gram-negative
and gram-positive bacteria.  The Company currently market four
antibiotics to treat a variety of infections caused by these
resistant bacteria.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, in Chicago, Illinois, the Company's auditor
since 2014, issued a "going concern" opinion in its report on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
stating that the Company's recurring losses from operations and its
need to obtain additional capital raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.

Melinta reported a net loss available to common shareholders of
$78.17 million in 2017, a net loss available to common shareholders
of $95.04 million in 2016, and a net loss available to common
shareholders of $94.92 million in 2015.  As of June 30, 2018,
Melinta had $514.6 million in total assets, $253.7 million in total
liabilities and $260.97 million in total shareholders' equity.


MID-SOUTH GEOTHERMAL: Unsecureds to be Paid from Annual Net Profits
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Mid-South Geothermal, LLC, filed a small business disclosure
statement describing its proposed plan of reorganization.

Class 6 under the plan consists of the general unsecured creditors.
Unsecured debt will be converted to equity and be paid a priority
amount from annual net profits for 10 years.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
continued operation of Debtor’s business. The Plan Proponent
believes that the Debtor will have enough cash on hand on the
effective date of the Plan to pay all the claims and expenses that
are entitled to be paid on that date.

The proposed Plan has the following risks: Debtor's business must
remain sufficient to pay Plan payments.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/tnwb18-21498-82.pdf

                 About Mid-South Geothermal

Mid-South Geothermal, LLC, installs geothermal heating and cooling
systems for large commercial projects.  Its principal place of
business is located at 28 Superior Lane Gray, Kentucky.

Mid-South Geothermal filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 18-21498) on Feb. 20, 2018, listing
$2.04 million in total assets and $2.14 million in total
liabilities.  The petition was signed by Scott W. Triplett,
president.  Judge David S. Kennedy presides over the case.  Steven
N. Douglass, Esq., at Harris Shelton Hanover Walsh, PLLC, serves as
the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


MOGUL ENERGY: Drops Bid to Hire Bentley as Financial Advisor
------------------------------------------------------------
Mogul Energy Partners I, LLC, has withdrawn a bid asking the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California for
authority to employ Philip Bowers of Bentley Associates, LP, as
financial advisor and sales broker.

Mogul Energy is seeking to confirm a Chapter 11 Small Business
Plan.  A hearing on the Plan and Disclosure Statement is set for
October 11.

The Debtor is also trying to fend off a bid by the U.S. Trustee to
dismiss the case or convert it to Chapter 7 liquidation.  A hearing
on this matter is set for September 18.

The Debtor sought to employ Bentley Associates, a licensed
financial advisor, saying the firm was in the process of assisting
it with a potential sale, restructuring recapitalization and or
reformation of the Debtor.  The Debtor disclosed that in previous
negotiations and attempted sales of the Debtor or its assets,
Bentley's commission was estimated to be in excess of $200,000
representing a 5% commission of a potential gross sales price.
There was also a minimum $200,000 flat fee in the previous
agreement.

The Debtor said a new retainer agreement was entered into by the
parties. The new agreement provided for a flat fee commission of
$25,000 based on anticipated future work to be performed on behalf
of the Debtor.  The $25,000 flat fee, the Debtor said, represents a
deep discount of the 5% commission that would normally apply to the
contemplated transaction that will lead to the Debtor's
reorganization. Assuming a sales price of $1.5 million or more, a
5% commission would be equal to at least $75,000.

Bentley attested that it is a disinterested person within the
meaning of 11 U.S.C Section 101(14) and has no connection with
Debtor, its creditors, parties in interest, their attorneys and/or
accountants, the United States Trustee, or any person employed by
the Office of the United States Trustee, or any person employed by
the Office of the United States Trustee.  Philip Bowers was
supposed to lead the firm's engagement.

The Debtor filed on August 2 a notice withdrawing its application
to employ the firm.

                 About Mogul Energy Partners I

Mogul Energy Partners I, LLC's principal asset is a 120-acre
windfarm located at 16214 Tehachapi Willow Springs Rd., Tehachapi,
CA 93561.  Mogul Energy Partners I filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 18-11949) on May 15, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Jeff Patterson, co-managing member, the Debtor
estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and liabilities. The
Hon. Fredrick E. Clement presides over the case.  Max D. Gardner,
Esq., serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.



MOLYCORP MINERALS: Court Narrows Claims in Trustee Suit vs WMNC
---------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Christine M. Arguello entered an order affirming and
adopting the July 23, 2018 recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge
Kathleen M. Tafoya that Defendant Weir Minerals North America's
Motion to Dismiss Counts Seven and Eight of Plaintiff's Complaint
in the case captioned In re: MOLYCORP MINERALS, LLC, PAUL E.
HARNER, Chapter 11 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. MODERN CUSTOM
FABRICATION, INC., and WEIR MINERALS NORTH AMERICA, Defendants,
Civil Action No. 17-cv-02157-CMA-KMT (D. Colo.) be granted.

The Court has reviewed all the relevant pleadings concerning
Defendant Weir Mineral North America's Motion to Dismiss Counts
Seven and Eight and the Recommendation, in addition to applicable
portions of the record and relevant legal authority. It is
satisfied that that the Recommendation is sound and not clearly
erroneous or contrary to law.

The Court, therefore, dismisses with prejudice Counts seven and
eight of the Plaintiff's complaint.

A copy of the Court's Order dated August 20, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2MdTsK5 from Leagle.com.

Paul E. Harner, Chapter 11 Trustee, Plaintiff, represented by Diana
R. Lotfi -- dlotfi@fgppr.com -- Foran Glennon Palandech Ponzi &
Rudloff, PC & George M. Ferreti -- gferreti@fgppr.com -- Foran
Glennon Palandech Ponzi & Rudloff, PC.

Modern Custom Fabrication, Inc., Defendant, represented by Aaron
Mark Bell -- AMB@THLF.COM -- Hustead Law Firm, P.C., Christopher D.
Yvars , Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP & Michael E.
DiRienzo -- mdirienzo@KDDK.com -- Kahn Dees Donovan & Kahn, LLP.

Weir Minerals North America, Defendant, represented by Carole
Elizabeth Reagan --creagan@UmbergZipser.com -- Umberg Zipser LLP,
Dean J. Zipser -- dzipser@UmbergZipser.com -- Umberg Zipser LLP &
Stewart McNab , Carver Schwarz McNab Kamper & Forbes, LLC.

        About Molycorp Inc. and Molycorp Minerals

Molycorp Inc. -- http://www.molycorp.com/-- is a global rare
earths and rare metals producer.  Molycorp owns several prominent
are earth processing facilities around the world.  It has a
workforce of 2,530 employees at locations on three continents.
Molycorp's Mountain Pass Rare Earth Facility in San Bernardino
County, California, is home to one of the world's largest and
richest deposits of rare earths.

Molycorp has corporate offices in the United States, Canada and
China.  CEO Geoffrey R. Bedford, and other senior management
members are located in Molycorp's corporate offices in Toronto,
Canada.  Other senior management members are located at its U.S.
corporate headquarters in Greenwood Village, Colorado.

Molycorp and its North American subsidiaries, together with certain
of its non-operating subsidiaries outside of North America, filed
Chapter 11 voluntary petitions in Delaware (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 15-11357) on June 25, 2015, after reaching agreement with
a group of lenders on a financial restructuring.  The Chapter 11
cases of Molycorp and 20 affiliated debts are pending before Judge
Christopher S. Sontchi.

The agreement provides for a financial restructuring of the
Company's $1.7 billion in debt and provides up to $225 million in
gross proceeds in new financing to support operations while the
Company completes negotiations with creditors.

The Company's operations outside of North America, with the
exception of non-operating companies in Luxembourg and Barbados,
are excluded from the filings.  Molycorp Rare Metals (Oklahoma),
LLC, with operations in Quapaw, Oklahoma, also is excluded from the
filings as it is not 100% owned by the Company.

Molycorp retained investment banking firm Miller Buckfire & Co. and
financial advisory firm AlixPartners, LLP.  Jones Day and Young,
Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP served as legal counsel to the
Company in this process.  Prime Clerk serves as claims and noticing
agent.

Secured creditor Oaktree Capital Management L.P., consented to the
use of cash collateral and to extend postpetition financing.

On July 8, 2015, the U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 case of
Molycorp Inc. appointed eight creditors of the company to serve on
the official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Creditors'
Committee tapped Ashby & Geddes, P.A., and Paul Hastings LLP as
attorneys.  On Nov. 9, the U.S. Trustee disbanded the committee
following the resignation of committee members Wilmington Savings
Fund Society FSB, MP Environmental Services Inc., Computershare
Trust Company of Canada, Veolia Water North America Operating
Services LLC, Delaware Trust Company, Wazee Street Capital
Management, Plymouth Lane Partners (Master) LP, and United
Steelworkers.

Molycorp, Inc.'s Fourth Joint Amended Plan of Reorganization was
confirmed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
on April 8, 2016.  The Plan contemplates two possible outcomes: (1)
the sale of substantially all of the Debtors' assets if certain
conditions set forth in the Plan are satisfied and (2) (a) the sale
of the assets associated with the Debtors' Mountain Pass mining
facility in San Bernardino County, California; and (b) the
stand-alone reorganization around the Debtors' other three business
units.

On Aug. 31, 2016, Molycorp reported that its confirmed Fourth Joint
Amended Plan became effective as of that date.  Molycorp emerged
from Chapter 11 protection as a newly reorganized business, now
known as Neo Performance Materials.

                         *     *     *

On April 13, 2016, Judge Sontchi directed the appointment of a
Chapter 11 trustee to oversee the operations of Industrial Minerals
LLC, Molycorp Advance Water Technologies LLC, Molycorp Minerals
LLC, PP IV Mountain Pass II Inc., PP IV Mountain Pass Inc., and RCF
Speedwagon Inc.  Each of the bankruptcy cases of the companies are
no longer jointly administered with Molycorp's case under Case No.
15-11357.

On May 2, 2016, the Court entered an order in the Molycorp Minerals
Debtors' cases approving the appointment of Paul E. Harner as
Chapter 11 trustee for Molycorp Mineral Debtors' bankruptcy
estates.


MONTREIGN OPERATING: Moody's Cuts CFR and Term Loans A & B to Caa3
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Montreign Operating Company,
LLC's Corporate Family Rating to Caa3 from Caa1 and Probability of
Default Rating to Caa3-PD from Caa1-PD. At the same time, the
company's term loan A and term loan B were downgraded to Caa3 from
Caa1. The rating outlook is negative. These rating actions conclude
the review for downgrade process that was initiated on June 11,
2018.

"The downgrade and negative rating outlook consider that despite a
slight pickup in Resorts World Catskills' monthly gaming revenue
during June and July, the improvement was not enough to alleviate
Moody's concern that Montreign will be challenged to support its
annual fixed charges of about $75 million going forward," stated
Keith Foley, a Senior Vice President at Moody's.

Resorts World Catskills' ramp up in terms of gross gaming revenue
continues be at a level well below expectations, and at a rate that
Moody's believes will not generate enough EBITDA to cover the
company's interest and scheduled principal repayments during the
next 12-18 months," added Foley. "As a result, without an equity
investment of some type, Moody's is of the opinion that Montreign
may require a restructuring that involves some level of
impairment."

Moody's recognizes that not all of the amenities and attractions
designed to increase customer traffic and revenue for Resorts have
opened. These amenities include an entertainment village hotel with
approximately 100 hotel rooms, along with dining, entertainment and
retail offerings that are expected to be open to the public in
December 2018. Also planned is a golf course that is expected to
open next summer. These non-gaming amenities should help drive
traffic over the longer-term. However, Moody's remains concerned
that these amenities will not help enough over the near-term to
ensure that Montreign will be able to meet its debt service
obligations in the next 12 to 18 month period.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Montreign Operating Company, LLC

Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to Caa3-PD from Caa1-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to Caa3 from Caa1

Senior Secured Term Loan A, Downgraded to Caa3 (LGD3) from Caa1
(LGD3)

Senior Secured Term Loan B, Downgraded to Caa3 (LGD3) from Caa1
(LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Montreign Operating Company, LLC

Outlook, Changed To Negative From Rating Under Review

RATINGS RATIONALE

Montreign's credit profile reflects the company's ramp-up
challenge. Since opening this past February, Resorts World
Catskills has reported monthly gross gaming revenue between $9.0
million and $13.1 million each month. Assuming Resorts World
Catskills is able to achieve a monthly gaming revenue rate of $15
million, annual gross gaming revenue would be about $180 million,
higher than the $150 million annual rate indicated by earlier
months, but still well below achieving the gross gaming revenue
performance needed to achieve $250 million of annual net revenue
that Moody's initially expected.

Positive credit consideration is given to the significant
experience of affiliates of the majority stockholder of Montreign's
parent entity in developing and managing casinos. Affiliates of the
majority stockholder of Montreign's parent entity have experience
developing and managing casinos around the world. Montreign is a
100% unrestricted subsidiary of Empire Resorts Inc. (unrated,
NASDAQ: NYNY), which in turn is owned 89% by Kien Huat Realty III
Limited, a family trust of which Tan SRI Lim Kok Thay, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of the Genting Group, is a beneficiary. The
family of Mr. Lim has an interest in Genting Berhad (Baa1 stable).
Genting has substantial interests in casinos around the world
including Resorts World Casino New York City and casinos in
Singapore and Malaysia.

Ratings could be downgraded if it appears likely that Montreign
will pursue a restructuring that involves some level of impairment.
Although not likely in the foreseeable future, a higher rating is
possible, but would require that Resorts World Catskills
demonstrate the ability to ramp up to a point of covering its fixed
charges and meeting its financial covenants once they go into
effect.

Montreign, a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Empire Resorts,
Inc. (not-rated), owns and operates Resorts World Catskills, a
casino resort which opened to the public on February 8, 2018.
Resorts World Catskills is located in Sullivan County, New York,
approximately 90 miles from New York City.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Gaming Industry
published in December 2017.


NEOVASC INC: Faces Lawsuit in New Jersey Over Tiara Device
----------------------------------------------------------
Neovasc Inc. has been made aware of a lawsuit filed by Endovalve
Inc. and Micro Interventional Devices, Inc. in the U.S. District
Court for the District of New Jersey including certain allegations
relating to Neovasc's transcatheter mitral valve technology,
including the Tiara device.  The complaint has not yet been served
on the Company.  If the Plaintiffs do serve the complaint, Neovasc
intends to vigorously defend itself.

                      About Neovasc Inc.

Based in Richmond, British Columbia, Neovasc Inc. --
http://www.neovasc.com/-- is a specialty medical device company
that develops, manufactures and markets products for the rapidly
growing cardiovascular marketplace.  Its products include the
Neovasc Reducer, for the treatment of refractory angina, which is
not currently available in the United States and has been available
in Europe since 2015, and the Tiara, for the transcatheter
treatment of mitral valve disease, which is currently under
clinical investigation in the United States, Canada and Europe.

Neovasc reported a net loss of US$22.91 million on US$5.38 million
of revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss
of US$86.49 million on US$9.51 million of revenue for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Neovasc had US$23.88
million in total assets, US$28.04 million in total liabilities and
a total deficit of US$4.15 million.

Grant Thornton issued a "going concern" opinion in its report on
the consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31,
2017, stating that the Company incurred a consolidated net loss of
US$24.86 million during the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and, as of
that date, the Company's consolidated current liabilities exceeded
its current assets by US$6.06 million.  The auditors said these
conditions, along with other matters, indicate the existence of a
material uncertainty that casts substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


NEOVASC INC: Granted Until Oct. 15 to Regain Nasdaq Compliance
--------------------------------------------------------------
Neovasc Inc. has received the decision of the Nasdaq Hearings Panel
to grant it an extension until Oct. 15, 2018 to regain compliance
with the US$1.00 minimum bid price requirement.  The Company also
plans to execute the reverse stock split (share consolidation),
approved at its Annual General and Special Meeting of Shareholders
on June 4, 2018.

The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC held an oral hearing on Aug. 30, 2018,
at which the Panel considered Neovasc's appeal of the Nasdaq
Listing Qualifications Staff decision to delist the Company's
common shares from the Nasdaq Capital Market for non-compliance
with the US$1.00 minimum bid price requirement.  In its decision
dated Sept. 10, 2018, the Panel agreed to provide Neovasc with an
extension until Oct. 15, 2018 to regain compliance with the minimum
bid price requirement.  To regain compliance, the closing bid price
of the Common Shares on the Nasdaq Capital Market must be at least
US$1.00 for at least 10 consecutive business days.  The Company
intends to execute a reverse stock split on the basis of 1
post-consolidation Common Share for 100 pre-consolidation Common
Shares in order to regain compliance with the minimum bid price
requirement before Oct. 15, 2018 and avoid delisting.  The Panel's
decision will stay any delisting or suspension action on the basis
of the minimum bid price deficiency until Oct. 15, 2018.

"We believe that remaining on the Nasdaq Capital Market is a
critical piece of our turnaround strategy for the Company, and
completing the reverse stock split on an accelerated timeline is a
necessary to maintain this listing.  We expect the reverse stock
split will assist our shareholders by simplifying our capital
structure through the consolidation of our shares to form a smaller
number of proportionally valuable shares," commented Fred Colen,
Neovasc's president and chief executive officer.

Subject to final approval by the Toronto Stock Exchange, the board
of directors of the Company has set the effective date for the
reverse stock split as Sept. 21, 2018.  Trading of the Common
Shares on a post-consolidation basis on the TSX and Nasdaq is
expected to commence on or about the opening of trading on the
effective date.  The registered holders of Common Shares will be
sent a letter of transmittal by the Company's transfer agent,
Computershare Investor Services Inc., providing instructions for
the exchange of their certificates as soon as practicable following
the effectiveness of the reverse stock split.  Non-registered
shareholders holding Common Shares through an intermediary (such as
a securities broker, dealer, bank or financial institution) should
be aware that the intermediary may have different procedures for
processing the reverse stock split. If shareholders hold their
Common Shares through an intermediary and they have questions in
this regard, they are encouraged to contact their intermediaries.

The reverse stock split will reduce the number of Common Shares
currently issued and outstanding from approximately 1,896,512,271
Common Shares to approximately 18,965,123 Common Shares.  No
fractional Common Shares will be issued in connection with the
reverse stock split.  In the event that a shareholder would
otherwise be entitled to a fractional Common Share hereunder, the
number of Common Shares issued to such shareholder will be rounded
up to the next greater whole number of Common Shares, if the
fractional entitlement is equal to or greater than 0.5 and will,
without any additional compensation, be rounded down to the next
lesser whole number of Common Shares if the fractional entitlement
is less than 0.5.

The reverse stock split will affect shareholders uniformly,
including holders of outstanding incentive stock options, warrants
and other securities convertible into or exercisable for Common
Shares.  The exercise/conversion prices, number and exchange basis
of such securities on the effective date will be adjusted
proportionately to reflect the reverse stock split, subject to the
Event Price Provisions described below.

Delisting or suspension from the Nasdaq Capital Market will trigger
an event of default under the Notes, which are secured by
substantially all of the Company's assets, and which could force
the Company into bankruptcy protection.  In recognition of the
vital importance of Neovasc remaining listed on the Nasdaq Capital
Market to its stakeholders, management and the Board of Directors
have elected to proceed with executing a reverse stock split
despite certain provisions in the remaining Warrants and Notes
that, on the sixteenth trading day following a reverse stock split,
reduce the exercise price or conversion price, as applicable, then
in effect to the average VWAP of the five trading days with the
lowest VWAP of the Common Shares in the preceding fifteen trading
days in the case of the Notes and twenty trading days in the case
of the Warrants.  As a result, the exercise and conversion prices
of the 34,628,148 Series A warrants, 22,431,506 Series E warrants,
as well as 1,322,192 Series A warrants and Series B warrants that
could be issued upon exercise of the outstanding Series C Warrants,
and US$26,442,500 principal amount of Notes that remain outstanding
will be adjusted following the reverse stock split in accordance
with the Event Price Provisions.

For a description of the risks associated with the Warrants and
Notes, the amount of such securities exercised and converted to
date, the dilution to date and potential dilution in the future due
to such exercises or conversions, see the Company's Annual Report
on Form 20-F and Management's Discussion and Analysis for the
quarter ended June 30, 2018, copies of which are available on SEDAR
at www.sedar.com and as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission at www.sec.gov.

The Company is also listed on the TSX and the Company's
noncompliance with the Nasdaq minimum bid price requirement does
not affect the Company's compliance status with the TSX.

                        About Neovasc Inc.

Based in Richmond, British Columbia, Neovasc Inc. --
http://www.neovasc.com/-- is a specialty medical device company
that develops, manufactures and markets products for the rapidly
growing cardiovascular marketplace.  Its products include the
Neovasc Reducer, for the treatment of refractory angina, which is
not currently available in the United States and has been available
in Europe since 2015, and the Tiara, for the transcatheter
treatment of mitral valve disease, which is currently under
clinical investigation in the United States, Canada and Europe.

Neovasc reported a net loss of US$22.91 million on US$5.38 million
of revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss
of US$86.49 million on US$9.51 million of revenue for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Neovasc had US$23.88
million in total assets, US$28.04 million in total liabilities and
a total deficit of US$4.15 million.

Grant Thornton issued a "going concern" opinion in its report on
the consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31,
2017, stating that the Company incurred a consolidated net loss of
US$24.86 million during the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and, as of
that date, the Company's consolidated current liabilities exceeded
its current assets by US$6.06 million.  The auditors said these
conditions, along with other matters, indicate the existence of a
material uncertainty that casts substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


NEWARK SPECIAL: Hires Joseph L. Pittera as Bankruptcy Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Newark Special Technologies, Inc., doing business as Magorien
Honing and Hydraulics, seeks authority from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California (Los
Angeles) to hire Joseph L. Pittera, Esq. as general bankruptcy
counsel.

Legal services the counsel agrees to render are:

     a. advise the Debtor regarding matters of bankruptcy law and
concerning requirements of the Bankruptcy Code, and Bankruptcy
Rules relating to the administration of this case, and the
operation of the Debtor's estate as a debtor in possession;

     b. represent the Debtor in proceedings and hearings in the
court involving matters of bankruptcy law;

     c. assist in compliance with the requirements of the Office of
the United States trustee;

     d. provide the Debtor legal advice and assistance with respect
to the Debtor's powers and duties in the continued operation of the
Debtor's business and management of property of the estate;

     e. assist the Debtor in the administration of the estate's
assets and liabilities;

     f. prepare necessary applications, answers, motions, orders,
reports and/or legal documents on behalf of the Debtor;

     g. assist in the collection of all accounts receivable and
other claims that the Debtor may have and resolve claims against
the Debtor's estate;

     h. provide advice, as counsel, concerning the claims of
secured and unsecured creditors, prosecution and/or defense of all
actions;

     i. prepare, negotiate,prosecute and attain confirmation of a
plan of reorganization.

The Law Office of Joseph L. Pittera established a flat fee of
$12,000 to handle the Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Joseph L. Pittera, Esq., owner of the Law Office of Joseph L.
Pitter, attests that he and his firm are disinterested persons
within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(14).

The counsel can be reached through:

     Joseph L. Pittera, Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH L. PITTERA
     1308 Sartori Avenue, Suite 109
     Torrance, CA 90501
     Tel: 310-328-3588
     Fax: 310-328-3063
     Email: jpitteralaw@gmail.com

                About Newark Special Technologies

Established in 1958, Newark Special Technologies, Inc., doing
business as Magorien Honing and Hydraulics, is in the business of
high precision I.D. contract honing.  The Company has also
incorporated an in-house division for deep hole gun drilling,
trepanning and boring.  The Company has recently merged with Modern
Hydraulic Technology to offer efficient and economical solutions
for building new hydraulic presses, modifying and repairing
presses, and complete overhauling of presses and cylinders.

Newark Special Technologies sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-18929) on Aug. 2,
2018.  In the petition signed by Batuk Viradia, president, the
Debtor disclosed $125,800 in total assets and $1,023,154 in total
liabilities.  Judge Neil W. Bason presides over the case.  Joseph
L. Pittera, Esq., at the LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH L. PITTERA, is the
Debtor's counsel.


NORTHERN OIL: Launches Consent Solicitation Regarding Secured Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. has commenced a consent solicitation to
solicit the consent of holders of its outstanding Senior Secured
Second Lien Notes due 2023 for amendments to the indenture
governing the Senior Secured Notes and the related intercreditor
agreement.  In addition, Northern has engaged RBC Capital Markets
as left lead arranger, bookrunner and administrative agent on a
proposed $425 million Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility to
retire its current $360 million first lien credit facility.

Highlights

   * The Proposed Amendments to the Indenture will allow for entry
     into the new Credit Facility and permit the issuance of
     additional Senior Secured Notes.

   * The $425 million Credit Facility and additional Senior
     Secured Note capacity will provide increased liquidity and
     financial flexibility to support the continued consolidation
     of non-operated assets in the Williston Basin.

   * Retirement of the current first lien facility will lower
     Northern's cost of capital, increase free cash flow and allow

     Northern to pay down additional debt in the future.

Management Comment

"The outstanding progress year-to-date is allowing us to return to
traditional sources of lower cost financing sooner than planned,"
commented Northern's Chief Executive Officer, Brandon Elliott.
"This increased financial flexibility will help continue our
consolidation of non-operated assets in the Williston Basin."

"This new Credit Facility, combined with our pending acquisitions,
will lead to a substantially improved balance sheet as we exit
2018.  We expect this to lower our cost of capital, increase future
free cash flow and allow us to more efficiently allocate capital as
we continue to evaluate additional consolidation opportunities,"
commented Northern's Chief Financial Officer, Nicholas O'Grady.
"This is a momentous step in Northern's progression and serves to
accelerate Northern's ability to execute upon its stated growth
strategy."

Amendment & Consent

The Proposed Amendments would, among other items, (a) amend the
Indenture to (i) incorporate customary mechanics for the issuance
of additional Senior Secured Notes thereunder; (ii) provide for the
entry into a new Credit Facility; (iii) permit the Company to make
certain Restricted Payments; and (iv) incorporate updates to the
reporting, debt, hedging, investments and additional collateral
covenants and (b) permit certain corresponding changes to the
related intercreditor agreement.

The Consent Solicitation will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City
time, on Sept. 17, 2018, or such later time and date to which the
solicitation is extended or earlier terminated.  Consents with
respect to the Senior Secured Notes may not be revoked after the
Expiration Time.  The Consent Solicitation is contingent upon the
satisfaction of certain conditions, including, without limitation,
the receipt of consents of holders of at least a majority of the
aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes outstanding
(excluding any Senior Secured Notes held by the Company or its
affiliates) to the Proposed Amendments by the Expiration Time. If
any of the conditions to the Consent Solicitation is not satisfied,
the Company is not obligated to accept any consent in the Consent
Solicitation and may, in its sole discretion, terminate, extend or
amend the Consent Solicitation.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Consent Solicitation,
upon receipt of consents of holders of more than 50% of the
aggregate principal amount of outstanding Senior Secured Notes
(excluding any Senior Secured Notes held by the Company or its
affiliates) to the Proposed Amendments, holders of Senior Secured
Notes who validly deliver (and do not validly revoke) their
consents prior to the Expiration Time (each such Holder a
"Consenting Holder") will receive consent consideration equal to
$0.015 per $1.00 in principal amount of Senior Secured Notes held
by such Consenting Holder.  The payment of the Consent Fees is
subject to the terms and conditions of the Consent Solicitation.

The complete terms and conditions of the Consent Solicitation are
set forth in the Consent Solicitation Statement that is being sent
to the holders of the Senior Secured Notes.

RBC Capital Markets is acting as the solicitation agent for the
Consent Solicitation.  Ipreo LLC is acting as the information agent
and tabulation agent for the Consent Solicitation.  Questions
regarding the Consent Solicitation may be directed to RBC Capital
Markets by phone at (877) 381-2099 (toll free) or (212) 618-7843
(collect) or by e-mail at liability.management@rbccm.com.  Requests
for Consent Solicitation Statements may be directed to Ipreo LLC at
(866) 406-2283 (toll free) or by email to consent@ipreo.com.

                        About Northern Oil    

Minnetonka, Minnesota-based Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. --
http://www.NorthernOil.com/-- is an independent energy company
engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development and production
of oil and natural gas properties, primarily in the Bakken and
Three Forks formations within the Williston Basin in North Dakota
and Montana.  

Northern Oil reported a net loss of $9.19 million in 2017, a net
loss of $293.5 million in 2016, and a net loss of $975.4 million in
2015.  As of June 30, 2018, Northern Oil had $883.08 million in
total assets, $1.03 billion in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $147.82 million.

                           *     *     *

In May 2018, Moody's Investors Service upgraded Northern Oil and
Gas, Inc.'s (NOG) Corporate Family Rating (CFR) to 'Caa1' from
'Caa2' and Probability of Default Rating (PDR) to 'Caa1-PD/LD' from
'Caa2-PD'.  The upgrade of NOG's CFR to Caa1 reflects its improved
leverage profile, reduced refinancing risk associated with the
remaining $203 million of notes due June 2020, and Moody's
expectation that the company will grow production and operating
cash flows.


NUTMEG MUSIC: Gets Final Authority to Use Citibank Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Sean H. Lane of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York has entered a final order authorizing Nutmeg
Music Incorporated d/b/a Nutmeg Creative d/b/a Nutmeg Audio Post
d/b/a Nutmeg Post d/b/a Nutmeg Recording to use cash collateral
solely as set forth in the budget through the first to occur of
Oct. 26, 2018 or the issuance of a Termination Declaration.

The approved budget provides total cash disbursements of $1,101,344
for week ending July 7 through week ending October 20, 2018

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor was indebted to Citibank, N.A.
in the aggregate principal amount of $784,078 for all outstanding
principal and all interest, default interest, charges, fees and
other obligations arising from or related to that certain
financing. Pursuant to the Loan Documents, the Citibank Debt is
secured by a first priority security interest in and lien on all of
the Debtor's personal property of every kind and nature, including
all products and produce of any of such property.

The Debtor is authorized and directed to pay to Citibank, N.A., as
adequate protection, the sum of $12,500 per week. Citibank, will
apply the Adequate Protection Payments: (1) in payment of accrued
pre-petition interest, (2) in payment of its reasonable
post-petition fees, costs, and expenses as set forth in the Loan
Documents, and, (3) in payment of the principal owed under the Loan
Documents. Citibank will provide counsel for Debtor, counsel for
the U.S. Trustee, and counsel for the Creditor's Committee (if any)
with a statement of account setting forth its allocation of the
Adequate Protection Payments, together with copies of invoices for
such fees, costs, and expenses.

In addition, Citibank is granted a valid and perfected replacement
security interest in, and lien on all of the right, title, and
interest of the Debtor in, to and under all present and
after-acquired property and assets of the Debtor of any nature
whatsoever, whether personal, tangible or intangible, wherever
located, including, without limitation, all cash and cash
collateral of the Debtor (whether maintained with Citibank or any
other financial institution) and any investment of such cash and
Cash Collateral, on all of the Debtor's personal property of every
kind and nature.

The Adequate Protection Liens will be (a) first priority perfected
liens on all of the Collateral that is not otherwise encumbered by
validly perfected, non-avoidable security interests or liens as of
the Petition Date, (b) first priority perfected liens on all of the
Pre-petition Collateral as to which Citibank had a valid and
perfected first priority lien as of the Petition Date, even if such
Pre-petition Collateral is subject to a validly perfected lien that
is junior to the lien of Citibank, and (c) junior perfected liens
on all Collateral that is subject to a validly perfected lien with
priority over Citibank's as of the Petition Date.

As further adequate protection against any diminution in value of
the interests of Citibank in the Pre-petition Collateral, Citibank
is granted an allowed superpriority administrative expense claims
in this chapter 11 case and any Successor Cases in the amount of
the Adequate Protection Obligations to the extent of any diminution
in the value of the Collateral.

The Adequate Protection Liens and the Adequate Protection
Superpriority Claims will be subordinate to the Carve-Out, which
includes:

     (i) fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section l930(a)(6) plus
applicable interest on delinquent fees pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3717;


     (ii) fees payable to the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court;

     (iii) fees of a chapter 7 trustee or trustees appointed in
this bankruptcy case not exceeding $12,500 in the aggregate; and

     (iii) reasonable professional fees and expenses incurred by
professionals retained and allowed pursuant to section 330 or 331
of the Bankruptcy Code in the amount of $15,000 per month for each
month, but in no event will the total Carve-Out for Professional
Fees exceed the sum of $60,000 in the aggregate.

Moreover, the Debtor is required to:

     (a) Comply in all respects with the terms and conditions of
the Final Order;

     (b) Cause all revenue, income, or other funds to be deposited,
on a daily basis (or as often as practicable), into the DIP
Accounts to be used only in accordance with the Final Order and the
Budget;

     (c) Utilize Cash Collateral to pay the expenses of the
operation of its business solely as provided in the Budget;

     (d) Deliver to Citibank on or before the close of business on
Tuesday of each week (i) a comparison for the prior week of actual
results of all items contained in the Budget to the amounts
originally projected in the Budget and (ii) a cumulative comparison
for the period from the Petition Date through the end of the prior
week of the actual results of all items contained in the Budget to
the amounts originally projected in the Budget, in each case along
with such supporting information as Citibank may request;

     (e) Provide telephonic updates to Citibank and/or its
professionals concerning the operations, business affairs, and
financial condition of the Debtor, in each case subject to
applicable confidentiality and privilege limitations; and

     (f) Provide Citibank with written operating and financial
reports in content and form requested by Citibank, including,
without limitation, on Tuesday of every other week, updated
accounts receivable and accounts payable aging reports.

A full-text copy of the Final Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb18-12056-28.pdf

              About Nutmeg Music Incorporated

Nutmeg Music, Incorporated, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-12056) on July 3, 2018, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor tapped
Richard E. Weltman, Esq., at Weltman & Moskowitz, LLP, as
bankruptcy counsel; Steven Landy & Associates, PLLC, as special
counsel; and Traxi, LLC, as financial advisor.


NUVERRA ENVIRONMENTAL: Dist. Court Affirms Plan Confirmation Order
------------------------------------------------------------------
Appellant David Hargreaves in the case captioned DAVID HARGREAVES,
Appellant, v. NUVERRA ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.,
Appellees, Civ. No. 17-1024-RGA (D. Del.) appeals the Bankruptcy
Court's Order Confirming the Amended Prepackaged Plans of
Reorganization of Nuverra Environmental Solutions, Inc. and its
Affiliated Debtors dated July 25, 2017. The Reorganized Debtors
filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Upon careful review, District
Judge Richard G. Andrews finds that the appeal meets the criteria
for equitable mootness and affirms the Bankruptcy Court's
Confirmation order.

The appeal arises from Debtors' plan of reorganization, pursuant to
which secured creditors, who would not receive 100% recovery on
their secured claims, made a gift to general unsecured creditors,
who would otherwise receive no distribution under the Bankruptcy
Code's priority scheme, in order to enable the Debtors to
reorganize. Even though unsecured creditors would receive no
distribution absent the gift, Appellant has appealed the
Confirmation Order based on the fact that the plan placed general
unsecured claims of the same priority into separate classes and
provided disparate treatment.

Appellant raises the following issues on appeal: (i) whether the
Bankruptcy Court erred by concluding that the Plan did not
discriminate unfairly in finding that the "gift" under the Plan
made by secured creditors to unsecured creditors providing varying
levels of claim recovery did not constitute unfair discrimination
under section 1129(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code; and (ii) whether
the Bankruptcy Court erred by concluding that the Plan properly
classified 2018 Note claims separately from other general unsecured
claims.

With respect to equitable mootness, Reorganized Debtors argue that
the Plan has been substantially consummated. Reorganized Debtors
assert that, if the Court agrees with Appellant that the Plan
unfairly discriminated against and/or improperly classified Class
A6 claims, correcting those errors would require a wholesale
reversal of the Plan, restoration of the Reorganized Debtors'
estates to the status quo ante prior to the Effective Date, and
disgorgement of the gifted distributions, which is not possible as
a practical matter and which would necessarily harm third parties
who reasonably relied on plan confirmation.

The Court holds that the Bankruptcy Court recognized the overall
harm to the Debtors and other third parties that may result on
appeal. The Court is unable to grant Appellant higher individual
recovery than other members of his class within the confines of the
Bankruptcy Code. Because correcting unfair discrimination and
improper classification issues would require undoing the Plan and
would necessarily harm third parties, and because it is unclear
what other practicable relief the Court may grant, the appeal meets
the criteria for equitable mootness.

The Court also finds no error in the Bankruptcy Court's conclusion
that the Plan did not unfairly discriminate, which is based on
uncontroverted, case-specific facts and consistent with applicable
case law and legislative history concerning unfair discrimination.

In sum, the Plan has been substantially consummated, and there is
no practical relief that could be granted to Appellant that would
not violate express provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, fatally
scramble the Plan, and significantly harm third parties who have
justifiably relied on plan confirmation. Therefore, the appeal
meets the criteria for equitable mootness. Alternatively, the
Bankruptcy Court's ruling is consistent with existing precedent,
and the Confirmation Order is affirmed.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum dated August 21, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2oTNG7g from Leagle.com.

David Hargreaves, Appellant, represented by Steven K. Kortanek --
Steven.Kortanek@dbr.com -- Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.

Nuverra Environmental Solutions, Inc., et al., Appellee,
represented by Pauline K. Morgan -- pmorgan@ycst.com -- Young,
Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Jaime Luton Chapman --
jchapman@ycst.com -- Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP &
Kenneth John Enos -- kenost@ycst.com -- Young, Conaway, Stargatt &
Taylor LLP.

                About Nuverra Environmental

Nuverra Environmental Solutions, Inc. (OTCQB: NESC) --
http://www.nuverra.com-- provides environmental solutions to
customers focused on the development and ongoing production of oil
and natural gas from shale formations.  The Scottsdale,
Arizona-based Company operates in shale basins where customer
exploration and production activities are predominantly focused on
shale and natural gas.

As of Sept. 30, 2017, the Company had $350.45 million in total
assets, $77.07 million in total liabilities and $273.37 million in
total shareholders' equity.

Nuverra Environmental and its affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-10949) on May 1, 2017.
The Hon. Kevin J. Carey presides over the cases.  

The Bankruptcy Court approved Nuverra Environmental Solutions'
Disclosure Statement and concurrently confirmed its Amended
Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization on July 25, 2017.  On
Aug. 7, 2017, the Plan became effective pursuant to its terms and
the Company and its material subsidiaries emerged from the Chapter
11 cases.  

Shearman & Sterling LLP served as bankruptcy counsel to the
Debtors, with the engagement led by Fredric Sosnick, Esq., Sara
Coelho, Esq., and Stephen M. Blank, Esq.  Young Conaway Stargatt &
Taylor, LLP, and Shearman & Sterling LLP, served as the Debtors'
co-counsel.

AP Services, LLC, acted as the Debtors' restructuring advisor.
Lazard Freres & Co. LLC and Lazard Middle Market LLC served as the
investment banker.  Prime Clerk LLC served as the claims and
noticing agent.  On May 19, 2017, the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  As of July 2017, David
Hargreaves has resigned from the Committee.  Kilpatrick Townsend &
Stockton LLP served as counsel and Batuta Capital Advisors LLC as
financial advisor to the Committee.  Landis Rath & Cobb LLP served
as Delaware counsel.


OFF THE GRID: Hires Lewis R. Landau as General Bankruptcy Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Off the Grid, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to
employ Lewis R. Landau, Attorney-at-Law as general bankruptcy
counsel.

Mr. Landau's services will include all legal services required to
assist the Debtors in Possession in fulfilling their duties under
11 U.S.C. Secs. 1106 and 1107 including all contested matters but
excluding corporate, tax, employment/labor, real estate transaction
and securities related services.

Lewis R. Landau, Esq. assures the Court that he is a disinterested
person as that term is defined in 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(14), and has
no interest adverse to the Debtors, their creditors, or the
estates.

Mr. Landau's hourly rate is $495 per hour. Landau received a
$14,000 retainer deposited into and held in Attorney’s client
trust account as a security deposit for services.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Lewis R. Landau Attorney-at-Law
     22287 Mulholland Hwy., # 318
     Calabasas, CA 91302
     Voice and Fax: (888)822-4340
     Email: Lew@Landaunet.com

                      About Off the Grid

Founded in 2009, Off The Grid LLC is a privately-held company in
San Simeon, California, that leases real estate properties.
Centrally Grown Holdings, LLC owns the Centrally Grown restaurant
and bar, which serves craft cocktails, local beers and wine. Both
companies are affiliates of Red Mountain Farms, LLC.

Off The Grid sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-10399) on March 20, 2018.
Centrally Grown Holdings filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-10624) on April 24, 2018. Red Mountain Farms,
LLC sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
18-10202) on Feb. 14, 2018. The cases are jointly administered
under Case No. 18-10399.

These cases were dismissed without a bar to refiling on or about
July 25, 2018. Debtors were represented by Finney Arnold, LLP as
debtor counsel in filing their voluntary petitions.

On Aug. 17, 2018, the Debtors sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code -- Off The Grid, LLC (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
18-11352); Centrally Grown Holdings (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
18-11353); & Red Mountain Farms, LLC (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
18-11354) -- on Aug. 17, 2018.  The cases are jointly administered
under Case No. 18-11352.

In the petitions signed by David Robertson, member, Off The Grid
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  Centrally Grown Holdings estimated $1
million to $10 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.

Judge Deborah J. Saltzman presides over the cases.


OLEGNA FUSCHI-AIBEL: Court Junks Complaint vs BNYMTC, SPSI
----------------------------------------------------------
Olegna Fuschi-Aibel, in the adversary proceeding captioned OLEGNA
FUSCHI-AIBEL, Plaintiff, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST
COMPANY, N.A. F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N.A. AS
TRUSTEE IN TRUST FOR AND THE BENEFIT OF THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF
MULTI-CLASS MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES CHASEFLEX TRUST,
SERIES 2007-2; & SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., Defendants, Adv.
Pro. No. 18-05013 (Bankr. D. Conn.) filed a one-page Complaint for
"the turnover of property and monetary damages commensurate with
the losses suffered." On April 20, 2018, The Bank of New York
Mellon Trust Company, N.A., f/k/a The Bank of New York Trust
Company, N.A. and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. filed a Motion
to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).

After reviewing all relevant submissions by the parties, Bankruptcy
Judge Julie A. Manning grants the motion to dismiss.

To survive a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), a
pleading must contain a short, plain statement of the claim showing
the pleader is entitled to relief,1 and a complaint must contain
sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to "state a claim to
relief that is plausible on its face." Ashcroft v. Iqbal, (quoting
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly). A pleading cannot merely recite
the elements of a cause of action, nor "tender[] naked assertion[s]
devoid of further factual enhancement."

In Iqbal, the United States Supreme Court described a two-step
analysis to evaluate the sufficiency of a complaint. First, all
allegations contained in the complaint, except legal conclusions or
"naked assertions," must be accepted as true, and second, the
complaint must state a plausible claim for relief. "A claim is
facially plausible where the plaintiff pleads factual content that
allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the
defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged." Determining the
plausibility of a claim for relief is context-specific and
"requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience
and common sense."

Although the Plaintiff is pro se, and her pleadings are therefore
held to a less stringent standard than those drafted by lawyers,
the Complaint is disorganized, confusing, and does not state any
facts that relate to a cause of action. The Complaint falls far
short of the pleading standard set out Iqbal and Twombly, and does
not contain enough factual matter to state a claim to relief, much
less one that is plausible on its face.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum of Decision dated August 16, 2018
is available at https://bit.ly/2CtTjmq from Leagle.com.

Olegna Fuschi-Aibel, Plaintiff, pro se.

Bank of New York Mellon, Defendant, pro se.

Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. & Bank of New York Mellon, and all
in Trust for, Defendants, represented by Stephen I. Hansen --
shansen@eckertseamans.com -- Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott LLC.

JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Defendant, pro se.

Olegna Fuschi-Aibel filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 18-50052) on Jan. 18, 2018.


ONE HUNDRED FOLD: To Pay Unsecs. in Full at 1% in 60 Installments
-----------------------------------------------------------------
One Hundred Fold II, LLC, submits a disclosure statement in support
of its proposed plan of reorganization dated August 31, 2018.

The plan provides for the payment of the secured value of all
properties by a sale, by offset of applicable flood insurance
proceeds, and by satisfaction of general unsecured claim to an
extent dependent on the election by creditors for settlement of
claims. Jerry L. Baker, Jr. as the owner and officer of the
business has agreed and is willing to work at a regular fixed
salary of $5,000 per month during the term of the plan, to help
promote the financial success of this plan. Unsecured creditors may
select an alternative option to take stock in the Reorganized
Entity in lieu of the proposed cash plan payments. Administrative
priority claims for professional services allowed by order of the
court will be paid upon confirmation of the debtor's proposed
chapter 11 plan. The debtor does not have priority tax claim issues
in the case.

The Reorganized Entity is obligated by the terms of the Plan and
will pay the Allowed Unsecured Claims in Class 5 in full at the
rate of 1% per annum simple interest. The payment of the Allowed
Amount of each unsecured claim in this class will be disbursed in
60 equal monthly installments commencing 90 days from entry of the
order of confirmation of the Chapter 11 Plan, or in the discretion
of the reorganized entity an Allowed Unsecured Claim as may be paid
in one lump sum payment of 25% of the Allowed Unsecured Claim
within 30 days of entry of a final non-appealable order of
confirmation.

Alternatively, at the election of each creditor that holds an
unsecured claim, such claimant may elect to receive
stock/membership interest in the Reorganized Entity in lieu of the
cash Plan Payments. This election must be made in writing and be
noticed to counsel for the debtor, no later than the deadline fixed
by the Court for submission of ballots accepting or rejecting the
Plan. The amount of stock/membership interest will be one share for
every $1,000 of the Allowed Unsecured debt upon confirmation of the
plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/lamb18-10313-63.pdf

                  About One Hundred Fold II

One Hundred Fold II, LLC, is a privately held company in Baton
Rouge, Louisiana, that leases real estate properties.  One Hundred
Fold II, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. La. Case No.
18-10313) on March 24, 2018.  In the petition signed by Jerry L.
Baker, Jr., manager, the Debtor estimated $500,000 to $1 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  Judge Douglas
D. Dodd presides over the case.  Attorney Pamela Magee LLC is the
Debtor's counsel.


PACIFIC DRILLING: Court Approves KEIP for $13 Million
-----------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that the Court hearing the Pacific
Drilling case approved the Debtor's implementation of its key
employee incentive plan ("the KEIP”).

BankruptcyData relayed, "The aggregate cost of the KEIP if target
performance goals are achieved represents 0.1% of the book value of
the Debtors' assets based on December 31, 2017 asset value on the
Debtors' balance sheet. The cost of the KEIP may surpass this
amount only if achieved performances exceed $140 million for the
2018 Revenue Period and/or $450 million for the 2019 Revenue
Period. Performance at or above the maximum levels of the metrics
(which will be extremely challenging) would result in a maximum
aggregate payout under the 2018 KEIP and AIP of approximately
$12.976 million (sum of AIP of $7.258 million and KEIP of $5.718
million)."

                     About Pacific Drilling

Pacific Drilling S.A. (OTC: PACDQ) a Luxembourg public limited
liability company (societe anonyme), operates an international
offshore drilling business that specializes in ultra-deepwater and
complex well construction services.  Pacific Drilling --
http://www.pacificdrilling.com/-- owns seven high-specification
floating rigs: the Pacific Bora, the Pacific Mistral, the Pacific
Scirocco, the Pacific Santa Ana, the Pacific Khamsin, the Pacific
Sharav and the Pacific Meltem.  All drillships are of the latest
generations, delivered between 2010 and 2014, with a combined
historical acquisition cost exceeding $5.0 billion.  The average
useful life of a drillship exceeds 25 years.

On Nov. 12, 2017, Pacific Drilling S.A. and 21 affiliates each
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-13193).  The
cases are pending before the Honorable Michael E. Wiles and are
jointly administered.

Pacific Drilling disclosed $5.46 billion in assets and $3.18
billion in liabilities as of Sept. 30, 2017.

The Debtors tapped Sullivan & Cromwell LLP as bankruptcy counsel
but was later replaced by Togut, Segal & Segal LLP; Evercore
Partners International LLP as investment banker; AlixPartners, LLP,
as restructuring advisor; Alvarez & Marsal Taxand, LLC as executive
compensation and benefits consultant; Ince & Co LLP and Jones
Walker LLP as special counsel; and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and
noticing agent.

On August 23, 2018, the U.S. Trustee appointed three creditors to
serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Debtors' cases.

The RCF Agent tapped Shearman & Sterling LLP, as counsel, and PJT
Partners LP, as financial advisor.

The ad hoc group of RCF Lenders engaged White & Case LLP as
counsel.

The SSCF Agent tapped Milbank Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, as
counsel, and Moelis & Company LLC, as financial advisor.

The Ad Hoc Group of Various Holders of the Ship Group C Debt, 2020
Notes and Term Loan B tapped Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &
Garrison, in New York as counsel.

                          *     *     *

On Aug. 1, 2018, Pacific Drilling S.A. filed a Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization based on the proposal presented to the Company's
Board of Directors by an ad hoc group of its secured creditors.
Pursuant to the Plan, the Company expects to raise $1.5 billion of
new capital comprised of $1.0 billion in a combination of first and
second lien secured notes and $500 million of equity.


PACIFIC DRILLING: Court OKs Second Lien Commitment Agreement
------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that the Court hearing the Pacific
Drilling case authorized the Debtors to enter into a second lien
commitment agreement which includes a commitment premium for
parties participating in the Debtors' offering of $300 million of
New Second Lien PIK Toggle Notes.

BankruptcyData relayed that the agreement notes, "As consideration
for the Commitments and the other agreements of the Commitment
Parties in this Agreement. The Debtors shall pay or cause to be
paid to the Commitment Parties (including any Commitment Party
Replacement, but excluding any Commitment Party that has committed
any Commitment Party Default) or their designees based upon the
Commitment Parties' respective Commitment Percentages at the time
immediately prior to the time at which it becomes payable, a
premium, payable in New Second Lien PIK Toggle Notes, in an
aggregate principal amount equal to $24.0 million (the "Commitment
Premium”) [upon certain termination events, the premium is to be
paid in cash]; provided that the Commitment Premium shall be
reduced by an amount equal to 8.0% of all or any portion of a
Defaulting Commitment Party's Commitment which is not paid to the
Company by a Replacement Commitment Party. The provisions for the
payment of the Commitment Premium are an integral part of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and without these
provisions the Commitment Parties would not have entered into this
Agreement, and the Commitment Premium shall constitute allowed
administrative expenses of the Debtors' estate under Sections
503(b) and 507 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Commitment Premium shall
be payable in New Second Lien PIK Toggle Notes or cash as set forth
.

                     About Pacific Drilling

Pacific Drilling S.A. (OTC: PACDQ) a Luxembourg public limited
liability company (societe anonyme), operates an international
offshore drilling business that specializes in ultra-deepwater and
complex well construction services.  Pacific Drilling --
http://www.pacificdrilling.com/-- owns seven high-specification
floating rigs: the Pacific Bora, the Pacific Mistral, the Pacific
Scirocco, the Pacific Santa Ana, the Pacific Khamsin, the Pacific
Sharav and the Pacific Meltem.  All drillships are of the latest
generations, delivered between 2010 and 2014, with a combined
historical acquisition cost exceeding $5.0 billion.  The average
useful life of a drillship exceeds 25 years.

On Nov. 12, 2017, Pacific Drilling S.A. and 21 affiliates each
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-13193).  The
cases are pending before the Honorable Michael E. Wiles and are
jointly administered.

Pacific Drilling disclosed $5.46 billion in assets and $3.18
billion in liabilities as of Sept. 30, 2017.

The Debtors tapped Sullivan & Cromwell LLP as bankruptcy counsel
but was later replaced by Togut, Segal & Segal LLP; Evercore
Partners International LLP as investment banker; AlixPartners, LLP,
as restructuring advisor; Alvarez & Marsal Taxand, LLC as executive
compensation and benefits consultant; Ince & Co LLP and Jones
Walker LLP as special counsel; and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and
noticing agent.

On August 23, 2018, the U.S. Trustee appointed three creditors to
serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Debtors' cases.

The RCF Agent tapped Shearman & Sterling LLP, as counsel, and PJT
Partners LP, as financial advisor.

The ad hoc group of RCF Lenders engaged White & Case LLP as
counsel.

The SSCF Agent tapped Milbank Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, as
counsel, and Moelis & Company LLC, as financial advisor.

The Ad Hoc Group of Various Holders of the Ship Group C Debt, 2020
Notes and Term Loan B tapped Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &
Garrison, in New York as counsel.

                          *     *     *

On Aug. 1, 2018, Pacific Drilling S.A. filed a Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization based on the proposal presented to the Company's
Board of Directors by an ad hoc group of its secured creditors.
Pursuant to the Plan, the Company expects to raise $1.5 billion of
new capital comprised of $1.0 billion in a combination of first and
second lien secured notes and $500 million of equity.


PACIFIC DRILLING: Seeks Court OK for $85MM in DIP Financing
-----------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Pacific Drilling requested Court
approval to obtain $85 million in senior secured postpetition
financing from certain members of an ad hoc group of secured
lenders ("the Ad Hoc Group”) and Wilmington Trust, N.A. as the
administrative and collateral agent. The financing motion explains,
"Faced with approximately $85 million in additional costs outside
the ordinary course of business and without access to approximately
$104 million of cash that has accumulated in the Ship Group B silo,
the Debtors do not have sufficient liquidity to make these payments
while maintaining targeted working capital to fund their operations
through the Effective Date. For these reasons, the Debtors have
secured a commitment from the members of the Ad Hoc Group to
provide an $85 million postpetition secured financing facility (the
'DIP Facility') to provide the necessary liquidity to complete
these transactions and emerge from chapter 11."The interest rate is
Eurodollar Rate plus 7%; and base rate plus 6%. The Court scheduled
a September 18, 2018 hearing to consider the DIP financing with
objections due by September 11, 2018.

                     About Pacific Drilling

Pacific Drilling S.A. (OTC: PACDQ) a Luxembourg public limited
liability company (societe anonyme), operates an international
offshore drilling business that specializes in ultra-deepwater and
complex well construction services.  Pacific Drilling --
http://www.pacificdrilling.com/-- owns seven high-specification
floating rigs: the Pacific Bora, the Pacific Mistral, the Pacific
Scirocco, the Pacific Santa Ana, the Pacific Khamsin, the Pacific
Sharav and the Pacific Meltem.  All drillships are of the latest
generations, delivered between 2010 and 2014, with a combined
historical acquisition cost exceeding $5.0 billion.  The average
useful life of a drillship exceeds 25 years.

On Nov. 12, 2017, Pacific Drilling S.A. and 21 affiliates each
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-13193).  The
cases are pending before the Honorable Michael E. Wiles and are
jointly administered.

Pacific Drilling disclosed $5.46 billion in assets and $3.18
billion in liabilities as of Sept. 30, 2017.

The Debtors tapped Sullivan & Cromwell LLP as bankruptcy counsel
but was later replaced by Togut, Segal & Segal LLP; Evercore
Partners International LLP as investment banker; AlixPartners, LLP,
as restructuring advisor; Alvarez & Marsal Taxand, LLC as executive
compensation and benefits consultant; Ince & Co LLP and Jones
Walker LLP as special counsel; and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and
noticing agent.

On August 23, 2018, the U.S. Trustee appointed three creditors to
serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Debtors' cases.

The RCF Agent tapped Shearman & Sterling LLP, as counsel, and PJT
Partners LP, as financial advisor.

The ad hoc group of RCF Lenders engaged White & Case LLP as
counsel.

The SSCF Agent tapped Milbank Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, as
counsel, and Moelis & Company LLC, as financial advisor.

The Ad Hoc Group of Various Holders of the Ship Group C Debt, 2020
Notes and Term Loan B tapped Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &
Garrison, in New York as counsel.

                          *     *     *

On Aug. 1, 2018, Pacific Drilling S.A. filed a Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization based on the proposal presented to the Company's
Board of Directors by an ad hoc group of its secured creditors.
Pursuant to the Plan, the Company expects to raise $1.5 billion of
new capital comprised of $1.0 billion in a combination of first and
second lien secured notes and $500 million of equity.


PACIFIC DRILLING: Seeks Court OK of Equity Commitment Agreement
---------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Pacific Drilling requested Court
approval to enter into an equity commitment agreement.

BankruptcyData related that the agreement notes, "Specifically, the
Debtors seek: (a) authority to (i) pay to the Commitment Parties
contemporaneously with the effective date of the Plan a commitment
premium payable in a number of New Shares equal to 8.0% of the
aggregate number of New Shares issued pursuant to the $500 million
Equity Issuance or, in the event that the Equity Commitment
Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, in cash in the
amount of $40 million (the 'Commitment Premium'); (ii) reimburse
and pay the reasonable and documented fees and out-of-pocket costs
and expenses of the Commitment Parties, including the fees,
out-of-pocket costs, and expenses of the counsel, financial
advisors, and consultants of the Commitment Parties (the 'Expense
Reimbursement'); and (iii) incur certain indemnification
obligations pursuant to the terms of the Equity Commitment
Agreement (the 'Indemnification Obligations'); and (b) the
allowance of the Commitment Premium, Expense Reimbursement, and
Indemnification Obligations as administrative claims in accordance
with the terms of the Equity Commitment Agreement. Pursuant to the
Plan, the Reorganized Company shall issue New Shares in the
aggregate amount of $500 million (plus an additional amount of New
Shares to pay the Commitment Premium), consisting of $350 million
pursuant to the Rights Offering, $100 million pursuant to the AHG
Private Placement, and $50 million pursuant to the QPGL Private
Placement. The Debtors believe the Commitment Premium is necessary
to induce the Ad Hoc Group to fully backstop and commit to the
Equity Issuance. The Debtors are incurring substantial expenses in
connection with the marketing of the New Notes and require
assurance that the entire $500 million of equity required under the
Plan is raised. Failure to pay the Commitment Premium creates the
risk that the Debtors will be unable to raise the equity required
by the Plan and potentially incur significant costs without being
able to consummate the Plan. Without assurance that the
comprehensive $1.5 billion capital raise contemplated by the Exit
Financing Transactions pursuant to the Plan will be achieved, the
Debtors would be unable to fund the repayment of all secured claims
in full (other than the Under-secured Claims), which may result in
such creditors no longer supporting the Plan. Moreover, having $500
million of fully committed equity capital will facilitate the
marketing and issuance of the New Notes. In the absence of the
consideration afforded by the Private Placements, Commitment
Premium, the Expense Reimbursement, and the Indemnification
Obligations, which are reasonable for the substantial amount of
capital being committed, the Debtors' ability to confirm the Plan
and effectively restructure their business pursuant to the Plan
would be uncertain."

The Court scheduled a September 18, 2018 hearing to consider the
equity commitment agreement with objections due by September 11,
2018, BankruptcyData relayed.

                     About Pacific Drilling

Pacific Drilling S.A. (OTC: PACDQ) a Luxembourg public limited
liability company (societe anonyme), operates an international
offshore drilling business that specializes in ultra-deepwater and
complex well construction services.  Pacific Drilling --
http://www.pacificdrilling.com/-- owns seven high-specification
floating rigs: the Pacific Bora, the Pacific Mistral, the Pacific
Scirocco, the Pacific Santa Ana, the Pacific Khamsin, the Pacific
Sharav and the Pacific Meltem.  All drillships are of the latest
generations, delivered between 2010 and 2014, with a combined
historical acquisition cost exceeding $5.0 billion.  The average
useful life of a drillship exceeds 25 years.

On Nov. 12, 2017, Pacific Drilling S.A. and 21 affiliates each
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-13193).  The
cases are pending before the Honorable Michael E. Wiles and are
jointly administered.

Pacific Drilling disclosed $5.46 billion in assets and $3.18
billion in liabilities as of Sept. 30, 2017.

The Debtors tapped Sullivan & Cromwell LLP as bankruptcy counsel
but was later replaced by Togut, Segal & Segal LLP; Evercore
Partners International LLP as investment banker; AlixPartners, LLP,
as restructuring advisor; Alvarez & Marsal Taxand, LLC as executive
compensation and benefits consultant; Ince & Co LLP and Jones
Walker LLP as special counsel; and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and
noticing agent.

On August 23, 2018, the U.S. Trustee appointed three creditors to
serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Debtors' cases.

The RCF Agent tapped Shearman & Sterling LLP, as counsel, and PJT
Partners LP, as financial advisor.

The ad hoc group of RCF Lenders engaged White & Case LLP as
counsel.

The SSCF Agent tapped Milbank Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, as
counsel, and Moelis & Company LLC, as financial advisor.

The Ad Hoc Group of Various Holders of the Ship Group C Debt, 2020
Notes and Term Loan B tapped Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &
Garrison, in New York as counsel.

                          *     *     *

On Aug. 1, 2018, Pacific Drilling S.A. filed a Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization based on the proposal presented to the Company's
Board of Directors by an ad hoc group of its secured creditors.
Pursuant to the Plan, the Company expects to raise $1.5 billion of
new capital comprised of $1.0 billion in a combination of first and
second lien secured notes and $500 million of equity.


PATRIOT NATIONAL: Claims in Aspen Suit vs E. Snow, et al., Narrowed
-------------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Jan E. Dubois granted in part and denied in part
Defendants Edward E. Snow, Carman Corporation, Selective Law Group,
LLC, and Selective Risk Management, LLC's motion to dismiss Aspen
Specialty Insurance Company's amended complaint.

In this case arising out of an insurance contract dispute, Aspen
asserts numerous claims against 34 defendants, including 25 unnamed
corporations. At its core, the case involves a series of insurance
policies issued by plaintiff to Hospitality Supportive Systems as
part of HSS's insurance sharing program for bars and restaurants.
Plaintiff contends that HSS provided incomplete or misleading
information regarding the member-insureds' loss history. HSS
asserts that plaintiff improperly cancelled and refused to renew
coverage for HSS and its member-insureds and mishandled or
improperly denied claims in bad faith.

Moving defendants argues that the following claims should be
dismissed: (1) Count X, in which plaintiff asserts an alter-ego
liability claim against Snow and Carman; (2) Count XI, in which
plaintiff asserts a negligence claim against Snow and Carman; (3)
Count XII, in which plaintiff asserts a participation liability
claim against Snow; and (4) Count XIX, in which plaintiff asserts a
claim for an accounting against Selective Risk and Selective Law.

The Court finds that the allegations set forth in plaintiff's
Amended Complaint are sufficient to state a claim for alter-ego
liability against Snow and Carman. Plaintiff asserts, inter alia,
that (1) Snow was the sole shareholder, principal and/or member of
HSS and Carman; (2) HSS and Carman operated out of the same
location and utilized the same management and personnel; (3) Snow
used HSS and Carman interchangeably by listing Carman as an
applicant on certain insurance application forms to plaintiff and
corresponding with plaintiff through shared HSS/Carman personnel in
their capacity as Carman employees with respect to claims arising
under the Aspen Policies issued to HSS; and (4) HSS, Carman and
Snow failed to maintain separate bank accounts and accounting
records and commingled accounts and funds. Plaintiff further
alleges that Snow and/or Carman used HSS to perpetuate a fraud
through misrepresentations, misstatements, or omissions regarding
known claims or losses against the additional named insureds.
Finally, plaintiff contends that piercing the corporate veil is
necessary to avoid injustice on the ground that HSS sold
substantially all of its assets.

The Court concludes that, at this stage of the litigation,
plaintiff sufficiently asserts a claim for alter-ego liability
against Snow and Carman. Accordingly, that part of defendants'
motion seeking dismissal of plaintiff's alter-ego liability claim
in Count X of the Amended Complaint is denied without prejudice.

Moving defendants further contend that plaintiff's negligence claim
against Snow and Carman in Count XI of the Amended Complaint is
barred by the gist of the action doctrine and the economic loss
doctrine. The Court disagrees with moving defendants on this
issue.

The Court concludes that plaintiff's negligence claim in Count X of
the Amended Complaint is not barred by the gist of the action
doctrine. First, Snow and Carman were not parties to the contract
between HSS and Aspen. Second, plaintiff alleges that Snow and
Carman made negligent misrepresentations that induced plaintiff
into entering the insurance contract with HSS. Therefore, they were
allegedly breaching a general social duty, not a duty established
by the insurance policy. Third, plaintiff asserts that Snow and
Carman were negligent "during the course of fulfilling [HSS'
contractual] obligations." The Court concludes that these
allegations are sufficient to plead a negligence claim against Snow
and Carman in Count XI of the Amended Complaint. Accordingly, that
part of defendants' Motion seeking dismissal of plaintiff's claim
in Count XI is denied without prejudice.

In their Motion to Dismiss, moving defendants contend that
plaintiff's claim for an accounting against Selective Risk and
Selective Law should be dismissed on the ground that there is no
valid contract between plaintiff and Selective Risk or Selective
Law.

The Court concludes that plaintiff fails to plead sufficient facts
asserting a contractual relationship between plaintiff and
Selective Risk of Selective Law. Accordingly, the Court grants
without prejudice that part of defendants' Motion seeking dismissal
of the claims for an accounting in Count XIX against Selective Risk
and Selective Law.

The case is in re: ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v.
HOSPITALITY SUPPORTIVE SYSTEMS, LLC, EDWARD E. SNOW, THE CARMAN
CORPORATION, SELECTIVE RISK MANAGEMENT, LLC, SELECTIVE LAW GROUP,
LLC, TRIGEN INSURANCE SOLUTIONS, INC., TRIGEN HOSPITALITY GROUP,
INC., PATRIOT UNDERWRITERS, INC., PATRIOT NATIONAL, INC., ABC
CORPORATIONS 1-25, CHICKIE'S AND PETE'S, INC., 4010, INC., PACKER
CAFÉ, INC., trading as "CHICKIE'S & PETE'S," 4010, LLC, POQUESSING
MANAGEMENT, LLC, POQUESSING PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, LLC, CPC
INTERNATIONAL, LLC, trading as " PHILADELPHIA'S FAMOUS C&P," WRIGHT
FOOD SERVICES, LLC, CPC BUCKS, LLC, AUDUBON CPC, LLC, WARRINGTON
CPC, LLC, DREXEL HILL CPC, LLC, VENUE FOOD SERVICES, LLC, CRABCO PA
GP LLC, 130 CRABCO REALTY NJ, LLC, 130 CRABCO NJ, LLC, trading as "
CHICKIE'S AND PETE'S," EHT CRABCO NJ, LLC, trading as "CHICKIE'S
AND PETE'S," WW-CPC, LLC, OC-CPC, LLC, AC-CPC, LLC, CRABCO
ENTERPRISES, LLC, CPC PROPERTIES, INC., CRABCO ENTERPRISES PA LP,
and PALMER SOCIAL CLUB, INC., Defendants, HOSPITALITY SUPPORTIVE
SYSTEMS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant, Civil Action No. 16-1133 (E.D. Pa.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum dated August 17, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2NojzTq from Leagle.com.

ASPEN SPECIALITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, represented by
JONATHAN P. MCHENRY -- jmchenry@connellfoley.com -- CONNELL FOLEY
LLP, PATRICK K. COUGHLIN – pcoughlin@connellfoley.com -- CONNELL
FOLEY LLP,PATRICK J. HUGHES -- phughes@connellfoley.com -- CONNELL
FOLEY LLP, WILLIAM D. DEVEAU – wdeveau@connellfoley.com --
CONNELL FOLEY LLP,EDMUND J. CAULFIELD -- ecaulfied@connellfoley.com
-- CONNELL FOLEY LLP, J. CHRISTOPHER HENSCHEL --
jhenschel@connellfoley.c0m --CONNELL FOLEY LLP & THOMAS M. BLEWITT,
Jr. -- tblewitt@connellfoley.com -- CONNELL FOLEY LLP.

HOSPITALITY SUPPORTIVE SYSTEMS, LLC, Defendant, represented by MARC
J. ZUCKER -- mzucker@weirpartners.com -- WEIR & PARTNERS LLP &
WALTER WEIR, Jr. – wweir@weirpartners.com -- WEIR & PARTNERS
LLP.

EDWARD E. SNOW, INDIVIDUALLY & THE CARMAN CORPORATION, Defendants,
represented by MARC J. ZUCKER , WEIR & PARTNERS LLP.

TRIGEN INSURANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. & TRIGEN HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC.,
Defendants, represented by JOEL MAX EADS -- eadsj@gtlaw.com  --
Greenberg Traurig, LLP & KATHLEEN M. KLINE -- kline@gtlaw.com --
GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP.

                   About Patriot National

Fort Lauderdale, Florida-based Patriot National, Inc., also known
as Old Guard Risk Services, Inc., through its subsidiaries,
provides agency, underwriting and policyholder services to its
insurance carrier clients, primarily in the workers' compensation
sector. Patriot National -- http://www.patnat.com/-- provides
general agency services, technology outsourcing, software
solutions, specialty underwriting and policyholder services, claims
administration services and self-funded health plans to its
insurance carrier clients, employers and other clients. Patriot was
incorporated in Delaware in November 2013.

The Company completed its initial public offering in January 2015
and its common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol "PN."

Patriot National, Inc., and affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-10189) on Jan. 30, 2018. In the
petitions signed by CRO James S. Feltman, the Debtors disclosed
$159.4 million in total assets and $242.2 million in total debt as
of Dec. 31, 2017.

The Debtors have tapped Laura Davis Jones, Esq., James E. O'Neill,
Esq., and Peter J. Keane, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones
LLP and Kathryn A. Coleman, Esq., Christopher Gartman, Esq., and
Jacob Gartman, Esq., at Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as co-counsel and
conflicts counsel; Duff & Phelps, LLC, as financial advisor; and
Conway Mackenzie Management Services, LLC, as provider of EVP of
Finance and related advisory services. Prime Clerk LLC --
https://cases.primeclerk.com/patnat -- is the Debtors' claims,
noticing and balloting agent.

James S. Feltman of Duff & Phelps, LLC, has been tapped as chief
restructuring officer to the Debtors.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee has named two creditors -- Jessica
Barad and MCMC LLC -- to serve on an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' cases.


PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS: KMT Loses Summary Ruling Bid in Trust Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------------
By the adversary proceeding captioned Devices Liquidation Trust,
Plaintiff, v. KMT Wireless, LLC dba CynergyHitech, Defendant, Adv.
Pro. No. 8-15-08237-AST (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.) plaintiff, Devices
Liquidation Trust seeks to recover $3,824,194.36 of alleged
avoidable transfers from defendant, KMT Wireless, LLC d/b/a
CynergyHitech. KMT seeks summary judgment on the Trust's preference
claims based on an argument that it was a critical vendor of one of
the Debtors and could or should have been insulated from preference
liability. The Trust timely filed opposition. Because KMT has
failed to establish that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of
law, Bankruptcy Judge Alan S. Trust denies summary judgment.

KMT advances a unique theory in support of its Motion, which it
acknowledges is "a case of first impression in the Second Circuit,"
but asserts has legal precedence elsewhere—that because KMT was
entitled to critical vendor protection under the CPM, this Court,
through a hindsight analysis, should decide what it would have done
had Debtors asked it to approve a waiver of preference liability as
to KMT.

KMT also supplied three affidavits in support of its Motion,
primarily directed to demonstrating that its services were critical
to Debtors Personal Communications Devices, LLC and affiliates’
proposed sale to Quality One: (i) an affidavit by Robert Desio,
PCD's former National Service Manager, (ii) an affidavit by Todd
Mazza, PCD's former Vice President of Sales to Verizon, and (iii)
an affidavit by Darin Mickel, KMT's principal. These affiants
acknowledge that the Repair Service Vendors were critical to
Debtors' ability to honor their warranty claims and to refurbish
phones returned out of warranty, and that the loss of the Repair
Service Vendors would have caused a severe disruption to the
Debtors' business. Affiants stated that it would have taken Debtors
many months to locate, engage and train another vendor to perform
the repairs Defendant provided. KMT also asserts that it would have
been impossible for Shine to perform the repairs being performed by
KMT, thus causing a severe disruption to Debtors' business, thus
preventing the sale from being consummated. Accordingly, KMT
argues, no one would have objected to approving payment of the
alleged preferential transfers in the CPM and accompanying orders.
Therefore, had all of this occurred, says KMT, the Court would have
approved of the payments and a preference waiver.

In support of its Opposition, Plaintiff provided three creditor
declarations: (i) the Declaration of HTC America, Inc., (ii) the
Declaration of Huawei Device USA, and (iii) the Declaration of TCT
Mobile Inc. The declarations state that each respective creditor
would have objected to the inclusion of a preference waiver.

The Court rejects KMT's theory of hindsight extrapolation, of
trying to consider and then make findings of fact on what it might
have approved at the initial stages of this case if a request had
been made to waive a nearly $4,000,000 claim in addition to paying
nearly $1,000,000 on pre-petition claims. The Court will not at
this juncture conjecture as to whether Debtors would have made that
request and who might have objected to it and what ruling the Court
might have made. Rather, the Court will enforce the orders it did
enter, which are not ambiguous and do not support KMT's Motion.

KMT, as the movant, has failed to establish that there is no
genuine issue as to any material fact and that it is entitled to
judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for
summary judgment is denied.

A full-text copy of the Court's Decision and Order dated August 17,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2Q7qtee from Leagle.com.

Devices Liquidation Trust, Plaintiff, represented by Kendra K.
Bader -- kbader@askllp.com  -- ASK LLP, Edward E. Neiger --
eneiger@askllp.com --ASK LLP, Gary D. Underdahl --
gunderdahl@askllp.com -- ASK LLP.

KMT Wireless, LLC, Defendant, represented by Taylor Dorn Kopelan --
tdk@dhclegal.com -- Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP & David H. Wander
-- dhw@dhclegal.com -- Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP.

                     About PCD

Personal Communications Devices LLC and an affiliate, Personal
Communications Devices Holdings, LLC, filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 13-74303) on Aug. 19, 2013, in
Central Islip, N.Y.  The Debtor disclosed $247,952,684 in assets
and $284,985,134 in liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

PCD -- http://www.pcdphones.com-- was in the business of providing
carriers and manufacturers an array of product life cycle
management services that includes planning and development;
inventory; technical testing; quality control; forward and reverse
logistics; sell-in and sell-thru, marketing & warranty support.

PCD sold its assets to Quality One Wireless LLC for $105 million in
October 2013.  The bankruptcy auction was cancelled as no competing
offers were submitted.

Bankruptcy Judge Alan S. Trust oversees the case.  Attorneys at
Goodwin Procter, LLP and Togut, Segal & Segal, LLP, serve as
counsel to the Debtors.  Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC, is the
claims and notice agent.  BG Strategic Advisors, LLC, is the
financial advisor.  Richter Consulting, Inc., is the investment
banker.

Q1W is advised by Raymond James and Associates, Inc., and Munsch
Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C.

A three-member official committee of unsecured creditors was
appointed in the Chapter 11 case.  The Committee retained FTI
Consulting, Inc., as financial advisor, and Perkins Coie LLP as
counsel.

PCD obtained confirmation of its Plan of Liquidation on April 11,
2014.  Under the Plan, unsecured creditors were told to expect a
2.8% recovery on $175.8 million in claims.  The sale of PCD's
assets was accompanied by a settlement where the buyer provided
$500,000 for winding down the Chapter 11 case and $3 million toward
expenses of the Chapter 11 process.


PRESSURE CONTROL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Pressure Control Specialties, LLC
        P.O. Box 1082
        Pleasanton, TX 78064

Business Description: Pressure Control Specialties, LLC is a
                      privately held company in Pleasanton, Texas
                      that provides equipment rental services.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 10, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Louisiana (Lafayette)

Case No.: 18-51134

Judge: Hon. John W. Kolwe

Debtor's Counsel: William C. Vidrine, Esq.
                  VIDRINE & VIDRINE, PLLC
                  711 West Pinhook Road
                  Lafayette, LA 70503
                  Tel: (337) 233-5195
                  Fax: (337) 233-3897
                  E-mail: williamv@vidrinelaw.com

Total Assets: $1,323,098

Total Liabilities: $2,120,557

The petition was signed by Kenneth W. Crouch, Sr., manager/member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/lawb18-51134.pdf


PRIMERA ENERGY: Court Junks Patek, et al., Bid for Reconsideration
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Craig A. Gargotta entered an order denying
Prevailing Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of Order Adopting
in Part and Denying in Part Amended Receiver's Report and
Recommendation in the case captioned FREDERICK PATEK; GERALDINE
PATEK; JASPER COMPISE; WILLIAM CRAWFORD; MICAHEL COVINGTON; RICK
GRIFFEY; ED MCPHERSON; DIETER JANSEN; QUACKENBUSH PETROLEUM LLC;
JAMES REILEY; BETTY REILEY; RICK REILEY; VINCENT J. GILLETTE;
MARJORIE A. GILLETTE; THOMAS J. GILLETTE; EDWARD A. GILLETTE;
SHARON WALLS; BUDDY WALLS; DC OIL COMPANY, INC.; BUFORD SALMON;
LILLIAN SALMON; JOSEPH HART; BRIAN HUBER; DAVID DAVALOS; DANIEL
DAVALOS; FREDERICK JOHNSTON; MILAN KNEZOVICH 11; FOUNTAINGATES
INVESTMENT GROUP; JAMES PETERS; and BROC YAKEL, Plaintiffs, v.
BRIAN K. ALFARO; KING MINERALS, LLC; SILVER STAR RESOURCES, LLC;
430 ASSETS, LLC, A MONTANA LLC; KRISTI MICHELLE ALFARO; BRIAN AND
KRISTI ALFARO, AS TRUSTEES OF THE BRIAN AND KRISTI ALFARO LIVING
TRUST; and ANA AND AVERY'S CANDY ISLAND, LLC, Defendants, Adversary
No. 15-05047-CAG (Bankr. W.D. Tex.).

Prevailing Plaintiffs urge the Court to reconsider the Order
because "a fundamental error was committed in the Court's analysis
which led to an incorrect result in the distribution of the funds
held in Receivership." Specifically, Plaintiffs challenge the
Court's interpretation of a Texas case, Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v.
U.S. & Mexican Trust Co., which the Court cited in support of
distributing the liquid receivership. Next, Prevailing Plaintiffs
argue that the Court wrongfully applied rules of equity when
determining the distribution of the liquid receivership and such
application was inconsistent, and therefore in violation of chapter
64 of the Texas Civil and Practice Remedies Code. Third, Prevailing
Plaintiffs assert that, according to at least one Texas case, the
Court abused its discretion by giving priority to claims not
identified Texas Civil and Practice Remedies Code section
64.051(a). Finally, Prevailing Plaintiffs argue that equity
dictates that the Court award claims to all Named Plaintiffs from
non-earnings.

Using the Court's interpretation of Waters-Pierce, the Court can
prioritize the payment of claims according to rules of equity where
claims to receivership assets exist, but are not specifically
identified under section 64.051(a). Plaintiffs contend that the
application Waters-Pierce is much more narrow and limited to
circumstances where the competing claims fall within the same class
and such class of claims are identified in section 64.051(a).

According to the Waters-Pierce court, because the appellants'
claims did not fall under any type of class designated in the
statute, the priority scheme dictated by a former version of
64.051(a) did not apply to these claims. Stated differently,
because these claims were not provided for in the statute, the
court's treatment of the claims was governed by the court's
discretion and rules of equity. The Waters-Piercecourt then goes on
to apply the rule approving the lower court's subordination of
appellants' claim to others placed in the same class.

The Prevailing Plaintiffs suggest that the Court's application of
this rule is too broad; rather the rule articulated by the
Waters-Pierce court should only be applied to the facts before the
Waters-Pierce court. The Court disagrees. The plain language of the
rule refers only to "these claims," which are previously identified
the appellants' claims which "[did] not come within any class
enumerated in said statute." The Waters-Pierce court articulates
this rule in the context of a type of claim not identified in the
statute. The plain language of the rule does not contemplate
competing claims within the same class of which is not identified
in the statute.

The Prevailing Plaintiffs also argue that the Court wrongfully
applied rules of equity when determining the distribution of the
liquid receivership and such application was inconsistent, and
therefore in violation of chapter 64 of the Texas Civil and
Practice Remedies Code. Section 64.004 states "the rules of equity
govern all matters relating to the appointment, powers, duties, and
liabilities of a receiver and to the powers of a court regarding a
receiver" unless inconsistent with chapter 64 or other general law.
The Court's authority to deviate from section 64.051(a) with
respect to claims not identified and treat such claims according to
rules of equity is consistent with section 64.004. Section
64.051(a) dictates what priority specific types of claims are to be
paid using earnings of property held in receivership. Section
64.051(a) does not mandate that earnings of property held in
receivership only be used to pay these types of claims. Moreover,
Texas case law permits the court to apply rules of equity when
determining priority of claims not identified in section 64.051(a).
Accordingly, the Court does not agree that subordinating Prevailing
Plaintiffs' claims to that of the Named Plaintiffs or North Cankton
and East Moss Lake/LNG investors is a violation of chapter 64 of
the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.

A full-text copy of the Court's Order dated August 17, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2NrN3Q8 from Leagle.com.

Frederick Patek, Geraldine Patek, Cal Curtner, Lisa Simpson, Jasper
Campise, Karen Smith, William Crawford, Mike Covington, Mike
McPherson, Ed McPherson, Dieter Jansen, Quackenbush Petroleum,
James Reiley, Betty Reiley, Rick Reiley, Vincent Gillette, Marjorie
Gillette, Thomas Gillette, Edward Gillette, Sharon Walls, Buddy
Walls, Buford And Lilian Salmon, DAVID DAVALOS, DANIEL DAVALOS,
FREDERICK JOHNSTON & MILAN KNEZOVICH, II, Plaintiffs, represented
by Brandon Barchus -- bbarchus@faulkbarchus.com -- Faulk Barchus
PLLC,Ashely M. Hymel -- ashley@faulkbarchus.com -- Faulk Barchus,
PLLC, Lawrence Morales, II, The Morales Firm, P.C. &Natalie F.
Wilson -- nwilson@langleybanack.com --  Langley & Banack, Inc.

Brian Huber, Joseph Hart & DC Oil Company, Inc., Plaintiffs,
represented by Brandon Barchus, Faulk Barchus PLLC, Ashely M.
Hymel, Faulk Barchus, PLLC & Lawrence Morales, II , The Morales
Firm, P.C.

Frederick Patek, et al., Plaintiff, represented by Brandon Barchus,
Faulk Barchus PLLC, Brandon Michael Barchus, Faulk Barchus PLLC,
David S. Gragg, Langley & Banack, Inc,Ashely M. Hymel, Faulk
Barchus, PLLC, Lawrence Morales, II, The Morales Firm, P.C.
&Natalie F. Wilson, Langley & Banack, Inc.

JOSEPH HART & BRIAN HUBER, Plaintiffs, represented by Natalie F.
Wilson, Langley & Banack, Inc.

Brian Alfaro, Primera Energy, LLC, Alfaro Oil and Gas, LLC, Alfaro
Energy, LLC, King Minerals, LLC & Silver Star Resources, LLC,
Defendants, represented by J. Mitchell Little --
mitch.little@solidcounsel.com --  Scheef & Stone, L.L.P. & Patrick
J. Schurr -- patrick.schurr@solidcounsel.com --  Scheef & Stone,
LLP.

Ana and Averys Candy Island, LLC, Brian, and Kristi Alfaro, as
Trustees of the Brian and Kristi Alfaro Living Trust, Kristi
Michelle Alfaro, 430 Assets, LLC, a Montana LLC & Alfaro, Kristi
Michelle, Defendants, represented by Patrick J. Schurr , Scheef &
Stone, LLP.

                   About Primera Energy

Primera Energy, LLC, headquartered in San Antonio, Texas, filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No.
15-51396) on June 3, 2015, to stop the investors from trying to
"squeeze" money out of the Company, according to the Company's
owner, Brian K. Alfaro.

The Company estimated its assets and liabilities at between $1
million and $10 million.  

Judge Craig A. Gargotta presides over the case.

Dean William Greer, Esq., who has an office in San Antonio, Texas,
serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

The Chapter 11 petition was signed by Mr. Alfaro.


PURE PRESBYTERIAN: Enforcement of Merger with Grace of God Upheld
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Resolving a contest over whether two churches -- The Pure
Presbyterian Church of Washington and The Grace of God Presbyterian
Church -- had agreed to merge, a jury found that the churches had,
in fact, contracted to merge. Based on the jury's finding, the
trial court entered an order enforcing the merger agreement. The
church that lost this contest, Pure Presbyterian, seeks to vacate
the order, arguing that the trial court lacked subject matter
jurisdiction to enter it. The Supreme Court of Virginia affirms the
judgment of the trial court and concludes that the trial court had
subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute.

Pure Presbyterian argued that "whether Grace Presbyterian is the
successor church to Pure Presbyterian-the ecclesia-is at its core
an ecclesiastical dispute, requiring the courts to choose between
competing ecclesiastical interpretations of their congregational
votes and joint services, and to determine who the clergy and the
membership are." The Court disagrees. Courts must use "neutral
principles" in adjudicating church property disputes, such as
"well-established concepts of trust and property law." "[A]s long
as courts avoid religious questions, church property disputes can
be resolved just like other property disputes within a voluntary
association."

There is nothing inherently ecclesiastical about an agreement to
merge two entities. Although a dispute over the existence or effect
of a merger agreement could turn on questions of church doctrine,
that is not the case here. Contract law principles are "neutral
principles" of law that courts can employ to resolve a dispute
between churches. Whether a church voted to merge is a question of
fact that does not require a court to resolve an "ecclesiastical"
question. Although the merger agreement spelled out who would
continue to serve as pastor and which entity would survive, neither
of the parties nor the court, relied on any theological or
ecclesiastical principles to resolve the issue of whether the
churches agreed to merge and whether Grace Presbyterian honored its
commitment under the merger agreement.

Resolution of a dispute using neutral principles of law may have an
effect on church governance. For example, the bankruptcy process,
like a merger, may put a particular church out of existence
altogether. But it will not be suggested that bankruptcy courts
lack the subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate such cases. The
same holds true for a merger.

A holding that courts categorically lack subject matter
jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes that have an effect on church
governance, even based on strict neutral principles, would place
churches in a singularly disfavored position compared to all other
litigants. Churches can decide to merge for a wide range of
reasons, such as cost savings, increasing the size of the
congregation, or offering more programs. A court has subject matter
jurisdiction to referee any disputes that arise under these
agreements, so long as it employs strictly neutral principles in
resolving the dispute. In this instance, theological questions
played no role in the jury's resolution of whether there was a
merger agreement and whether it was breached. Consequently, the
court had subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute.

Pure Presbyterian also contends that the trial court lacked subject
matter jurisdiction to dispose of the church property, because at
the time of filing, the bankruptcy court implicitly retained in rem
jurisdiction over the property for all purposes, other than for
effecting a merger or sale, and it also retained jurisdiction over
the indebtedness. Accordingly, it argues, the court's final order
in which it disposed of the Church Property is thus void ab
initio.

On Sept. 21, 2016, the bankruptcy court approved the plan of
reorganization submitted by Pure Presbyterian. Article IX of the
plan "retain[ed] jurisdiction of th[is] case" for an enumerated
list of purposes. Article IX did not encompass the church property
and said nothing about the merger agreement. Nothing, therefore,
foreclosed the Fairfax County Circuit Court from exercising
post-confirmation jurisdiction to determine whether a merger had,
in fact, occurred. Therefore, the trial court had jurisdiction to
adjudicate the complaint.

The case is THE PURE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF WASHINGTON, ET AL. v.
THE GRACE OF GOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, Record No. 171098 (Va.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion dated August 16, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2NQmEbQ from Leagle.com.

EARLE DUNCAN GETCHELL, JR., (ESQ.) -- egetchell@mcguirewoods.com --
ROBERT WILLIAM LOFTIN, (ESQ.) -- rloftin@mcguirewoods.com --
MICHAEL HUGH BRADY, (ESQ.) -- mbrady@mcguirewoods.com --  for
Appellant, PURE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF WASHINGTON, SAMYEOL KIM.

JOHN CHAPMAN PETERSEN, (ESQ.), DAVID LEE AMOS, (ESQ.) --
dla@petersenfirm.com -- for Appellee, GRACE OF GOD PRESBYTERIAN
CHURCH.

            About The Pure Presbyterian Church

The Pure Presbyterian Church of Washington filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 15-13848) on November 2, 2015,
and is represented by Bennett A. Brown, Esq., in Fairfax, Virginia.
At the time of filing, the Debtor had $1 million to $10 million in
estimated assets and $1 million to $10 million in estimated
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Brian F. Kenney.  The
petition was signed by Sam Y. Kim, trustee.  A list of the Debtor's
two largest unsecured creditors is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/vaeb15-13848.pdf


RESIDENTIAL FUNDING: Summary Ruling Bid vs ALTF et al., Partly OK'd
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned In Re: RFC and RESCAP Liquidating Trust
Action, No. 13-cv-3351 (SRN/HB) (D. Minn.), District Court Susan
Richard Nelson granted in part, denied in part, and denied without
prejudice in part Plaintiffs Residential Funding Company and RESCAP
Liquidating Trust's Motion for Summary Judgment on Common Issues,
and granted in part and denied in part Defendants Ark-La-Tex
Financial Services, LLC et al.'s Motion for Summary Judgment on
Common Issues.

Plaintiffs seek summary judgment on the following issues: (1) the
Client Guide confers Plaintiffs with sole discretion to (a)
determine breaches of Defendants' R&Ws, and (b) enter into, and
determine the amounts of, the Settlements, such that Defendants may
not challenge the Settlements as unreasonable; (2) the Client Guide
should be broadly interpreted to permit recovery for (a) all
liabilities, not just losses, or, alternatively, (b) all losses on
breaching loans; (3) Defendants' breaches caused RFC's
origination-related losses and liabilities; (4) Defendants'
affirmative defenses that contradict the Client Guide fail, as do
any defenses that RFC's actions or other "superseding and
intervening factors" may have contributed to RFC's liabilities; (5)
Defendants' liability for indemnity is not extinguished by (a)
RFC's bankruptcy or (b) RFC's alleged wrongdoing; (6) Plaintiffs
may use statistical sampling to prove their claims and need not
re-underwrite each at-issue loan; and (7) Plaintiffs' right to
assert claims for remedies extends to losses and liabilities on
foreclosed and liquidated loans.

Defendants move for summary judgment on the following issues, some
of which overlap with Plaintiffs' affirmative motions: (1) RFC
cannot recover damages under its Breaching Loss damages methodology
because (a) Residential Funding Co., LLC v. Quicken Loans, Inc.,
2017 WL 5571222 (Minn. Dist. Ct. Feb. 1, 2017), precludes such
damages, (b) repurchase damages are unavailable under RFC's "guise"
of seeking indemnity for losses or liabilities under Section A212
of the Client Guide, and (c) RFC fails to prove that Defendants'
alleged R&W breaches caused loan-level losses; (2) RFC cannot
recover damages under its Allocated Breaching Loss damages approach
because it fails to provide a non-speculative basis for allocating
the RMBS Trust Settlements and Monoline Settlements; (3) RFC's
Allocated Loss approach to calculating damages fails; (4) RFC is
not entitled to indemnity for its own misconduct (a) as evidenced
by allegations of fraud and negligence against RFC, (b) because the
Client Guide does not permit indemnity for RFC's own misconduct,
and (c) because even if the Client Guide permitted such recovery,
it would be unenforceable; (5) RFC's claims for loans sold before
May 14, 2006 are time-barred; (6) RFC is barred from recovering
damages on "expired" loans; (7) RFC cannot recover damages
resulting from alleged breaches of pool-wide representations; (8)
RFC's indemnity claim related to the MBIA Settlement fails; (9) RFC
cannot use sampling to establish liability for loans outside its
samples; (10) damages for indemnity are limited to RFC's actual
losses; and (11) RFC's expert opinions are inadmissible and
foreclose its claims.

Respectively, the parties move for summary judgment on several
identical bases. These include whether RFC's alleged "misconduct"
precludes recovery on its claims for indemnification, whether RFC
can recover losses and liabilities incurred from "expired" loans,
whether RFC's liabilities were extinguished in bankruptcy, and
whether RFC may use statistical sampling as a means of establishing
liability and damages.

In addressing the misconduct issue, the Court finds there has not
been a threshold finding that RFC engaged in fraud or other
misconduct with respect to the claims underlying the Settlements,
and the Client Guide expressly permitted RFC to seek
indemnification for its own negligence. Given the lack of any
evidence of intentional wrongdoing, the Court finds no public
policy violation in permitting Plaintiffs to seek indemnification
for these claims. While the indemnification provisions remain
enforceable, Plaintiffs still bear the burden of establishing
causation and damages. As to Defendants' misconduct defenses,
however, Plaintiffs are entitled to summary judgment on this
ground, and Defendants' summary judgment motion on this ground is
denied.

Both parties move for summary judgment regarding whether Plaintiffs
may recover for claims that RFC released in bankruptcy. Defendants
argue that RFC's indemnity claim is barred to the extent that it
seeks recovery for more than its actual losses, claiming that RFC
and its bankruptcy estate were released from all liabilities
through bankruptcy. They acknowledge that certain Defendants
previously raised this argument in a motion to dismiss, which the
Court denied. But, they contend that (1) this Court was wrong, and
(2) new evidence further supports their position.

While the estate of a debtor typically ceases to exist once a
Chapter 11 plan is confirmed, the termination of a bankruptcy
estate is subject to the terms and provisions of the confirmed
plan. The language of confirmation orders and bankruptcy plans will
obviously differ from case to case. As this Court has again
explained, the applicable language in this case did not extinguish
the Allowed Claims themselves or Defendants' obligation to
indemnify Plaintiffs for them. Accordingly, the Court reaffirms its
June 2015 decision and grants summary judgment to Plaintiffs and
denies summary judgment to Defendants.

The Court grants Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to the
Allocated Loss Approach. First, for the same reasons as the Court
articulated with respect to the Breaching Loss Approach, the
Allocated Loss Approach could allow RFC to recover a windfall. By
setting the cap on damages at Breaching Losses, the Allocated Loss
Approach does not account for the discount that the parties agreed
to in the bankruptcy settlement. Thus, the approach would allow
certain defendants to be charged with a greater share of
indemnification liability than provided by the Settlements. Second,
the Court finds that assessing damages without accounting for a
Defendant's breach rate results in an inaccurate measure of
damages. Therefore, the Court will enter summary judgment
precluding admission of the Allocated Loss Approach.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated
August 15, 2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2M5XMva from
Leagle.com.

Residential Funding Company, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Adam M.
Abensohn -- adamabensohn@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart
& Sullivan, LLP, pro hac vice, Alexander J. Merton --
alexandermerton@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan LLP, pro hac vice, Alexandria Deep Conroy --
alexandriaconroy@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and
Sullivan, pro hac vice, Amroh Faisal Idris --
amrohidris@quinnemanuel.com-- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,
pro hac vice, Anthony Paul Alden , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, pro hac vice, Bradley T. Smith , Felhaber Larson,
Christina Wu -- christinawu@ quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, pro hac vice, Claire Disston Heausman  --
claireheausman@quinnemanuel.com Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,
LLP, pro hac vice,Daniel R. Kelly , Felhaber Larson, Danielle L.
Gilmore , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, pro hac vice,
Danielle Marie Shrader-Frechette , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, LLP, pro hac vice, Darren Mitchell Goldman , Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, pro hac vice, David C. Armillei ,
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, pro hac vice, David Michael
Grable , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, pro hac vice, David
L. Hashmall , Felhaber Larson, Dawn Utsumi , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart
& Sullivan, pro hac vice, Deborah Kay Brown , Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, pro hac vice, Diane L. Cafferata , Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, pro hac vice,Donald G. Heeman ,
Felhaber Larson, Duane R.A. Lyons , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, pro hac vice, Elisabeth Bach Miller , Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, pro hac vice, Eric H. Huang , Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, pro hac vice.

ResCap Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff, represented by Adam M.
Abensohn , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, pro hac vice,
Alexander J. Merton , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, pro
hac vice, Alexandria Deep Conroy , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and
Sullivan, pro hac vice, Amroh Faisal Idris , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart
& Sullivan, pro hac vice, Anthony Paul Alden , Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, pro hac vice, Bradley T. Smith , Felhaber
Larson, Christina Wu , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, pro
hac vice, Claire Disston Hausman , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, LLP, pro hac vice,Daniel R. Kelly , Felhaber Larson,
Danielle L. Gilmore , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, pro
hac vice, Danielle Marie Shrader-Frechette , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart
& Sullivan, LLP, pro hac vice, David C. Armillei , Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, pro hac vice, David L. Hashmall ,
Felhaber Larson, Dawn Utsumi , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,
pro hac vice, Deborah Kay Brown , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
LLP, pro hac vice, Diane L. Cafferata , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, LLP, pro hac vice, Donald G. Heeman , Felhaber Larson,
Duane R.A. Lyons , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, pro hac vice,
Elisabeth Bach Miller , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, pro
hac vice, Eric H. Huang.

Ark-La-Tex Financial Services, LLC, Defendant, represented by James
M. Jorissen -- jjorissen@losgs.com -- Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer,
Gale & Sayre, Ltd & Mark J. Carpenter  --
mark@carpenter-law-firm.com -- Carpenter Law Firm PLLC.

First Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, represented by Gene A. Hoff
-- gene@minenkohoff.com -- Minenko & Hoff, Michael J. Minenko --
Michael@minenkohoff.com -- Minenko & Hoff, P.A. & Thomas Michael
Sullivan, Jr. , Thomas M. Sullivan, Jr., pro hac vice.

E Trade Bank, as successor to United Medical Bank, FSB, Defendant,
represented byBrandon P. Rose , Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price &
Azelrod LLP, Peter McElligott , Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA,
Philip R. Stein , Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, pro hac
vice, Shalia M. Sakona , Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP,
pro hac vice &Sharda R. Enslin , City of Minneapolis - City
Attorney's Office.


RITCHIE RISK-LINKED: Unsecureds to Get 75%-100% Under Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies, LLC, filed a combined disclosure
statement and Chapter 11 plan of liquidation.

General unsecured claims, classified in Class 3, are impaired.
After payment in full of Allowed Class 2 Other Priority Claims (if
any), up to 75% of the Allowed amount of General Unsecured Claims
(without interest) to be made available from up to $220,000 of
proceeds of the DIP Loan, plus Allowed General Unsecured Claims Pro
Rata Share of the net recovery on the Litigation Claims up to an
aggregate recovery of 100% (without interest). Estimated aggregate
recovery of at least $216,881.01 and up to $289,184.01 for holders
of Class 3 Claims.

Class 3 General Unsecured Claims will not include Claims subject to
subordination under section 510(b), which are Class 4 Subordinated
Unsecured Claims. In addition, the General Unsecured Claims of the
Managing Member, the Manager, Swansea Beneficiary Trust, LLC, and
Ritchie Risked-Link Opportunities, LLC will not receive any Class 3
distribution on account of their Claims.  Thus, the Debtor
estimated that there are approximately $289,184.01 in General
Unsecured Claims.

Subordinated unsecured claims, classified in Class 4, are impaired.
After payment in full of the Allowed Class 2 Other Priority
Claims, Allowed Class 3 General Unsecured Claims and Allowed Class
1 Secured Claim of the Prepetition Lender, up to 100% from the
Allowed Subordinated Unsecured Claims' total Pro Rata Share of
one-half of the net recovery on the Litigation Claims. Potential
aggregate recovery of $0 to approximately $19,621,692 (which may be
52.2% of Subordinated Unsecured Claims).

The net proceeds of the Litigation Claims in a "best case" scenario
is estimated to be $39,243,385, one half of which is
$19,621,692.50.  Total Class 4 Subordinated Unsecured Claims,
including Disputed Claims, may total approximately $37,583,000,
including (a) Huizenga's $11 million attorneys' fee claims, (b)
Thane Ritchie's $13.383 million indemnification claim, (c) the
Excess Insurers' claim in the amount of $11.2 million relating to
the First Judgment, and (c) claims for indemnification relating to
approximately $2 million in post-judgment attorneys' fees and
expenses.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yclly686 from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

               About Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies

Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies, LLC, is an investment firm based in
Newark, Delaware.  Ritchie Multi-Strategy Global, LLC owns 95.49%
equity in the company.

Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 18-11555) on June
28, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets
of $10 million to $50 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  Judge Kevin J. Carey presides over the case.  Reed Smith
LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.



RMH FRANCHISE: Plan Sponsor to Infuse $10MM Capital
---------------------------------------------------
RMH Franchise Holdings, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates filed a
disclosure statement with respect to their joint chapter 11 plan
dated Sept. 4, 2018.

The Plan implements a comprehensive restructuring of the Debtors
through the issuance of the Plan Sponsor New Common Stock to the
Plan Sponsor and a capital infusion from the Plan Sponsor in the
amount of the Plan Sponsor Cash Payment, which is $10,000,000. The
funding of the Plan Sponsor Cash Payment and issuance of the Plan
Sponsor New Common Stock is expressly conditioned on the Bankruptcy
Court finding in the Applebee's Litigation that the Franchise
Agreements identified to be assumed pursuant to the Plan are in
full force and effect and were not terminated prior to Petition
Date. Except as otherwise provided for in the Plan or the
Confirmation Order, all Cash required for the payments to be made
under the Plan will be obtained from the Debtors' and the
Reorganized Debtors' operations and Cash balances, plus the Plan
Sponsor Cash Payment and proceeds from Causes of Action, including
the Applebee's Litigation.

Under the Plan, for purposes of distributions in connection with
the Plan, the Debtors will be substantively consolidated, meaning
that, among other things, all of the Assets and liabilities of the
Debtors will be deemed merged or treated as though they were merged
into and with the Assets and liabilities of each other, and all
guarantees of the Debtors of the obligations of any other Debtor
will be deemed eliminated and extinguished so that any Claim
against any Debtor, and any guarantee thereof executed by any
Debtor and any joint or several liability of any of the
Debtors will be deemed to be one obligation of the consolidated
Debtors. As a result, the votes to accept or reject the Plan by
Holders of Claims against a particular Debtor will be tabulated as
votes to accept or reject the Plan for the substantively
consolidated Debtors.

Each holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim in Class 6 will
receive, on the Effective Date, in full and final satisfaction of
such claim a distribution equal to 10% of the amount of such
Allowed General Unsecured Claim. Class 6 is impaired.

All Cash required for the payments to be made under the Plan shall
be obtained from the Debtors' and the Reorganized Debtors'
operations and Cash balances, plus the Plan Sponsor Cash Payment
and proceeds from Causes of Action, including the Applebee's
Litigation.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Sept. 4, 2018 is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb18-11092-526.pdf

             About RMH Franchise Holdings

RMH Franchise, headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia --
https://www.rmhfranchise.com/ -- is an Applebee's restaurant
franchisee with over 163 standardized restaurants located across 15
states.  RMH Holdings is the direct or indirect parent of each of
the other Debtors.  ACON Franchise Holdings, LLC, a non-debtor,
owns 100% of the shares of RMH Holdings.

RMH Franchise Holdings, Inc., and certain of its affiliates filed
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-11092) on May
8, 2018.  In the petitions were signed Michael Muldoon, president,
RMH Franchise Holdings estimated assets and liabilities of $100
million to $500 million.

Affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code are NuLnk, Inc. (Bankr. D.
Del. Case No. 18-11093), RMH Illinois, LLC (Case No. 18-11094), RMH
Franchise Corporation (Case No. 18-11095), and Contex Restaurants,
Inc. (Case No. 18-11096).

The case is assigned to Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon.

Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, serves as bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtors; Mastodon Ventures, Inc., is the
restructuring advisor; Hilco Real Estate LLC serves as real estate
broker; and Prime Clerk LLC acts as claims and noticing agent.

On May 24, 2018, the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee
of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' cases.  Kelley Drye & Warren
LLP serves as lead counsel to the Committee while Zolfo Cooper LLC
acts as bankruptcy consultant and financial advisor.


RODEO ROOFING: Seeks Authorization on Cash Collateral Use
---------------------------------------------------------
Rodeo Roofing LLC seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Washington to use cash collateral
in accordance with a budget.

The Budget prepared by the Debtor is for funding for its continued
operations through Jan. 31, 2019.  The Debtor is requesting
authority that, absent objection, it be entitled to use cash
collateral in accordance with the Budget provided through Jan. 31,
2019.  However, in order to afford creditors who may have an
actual, enforceable interest in the cash collateral a fair
opportunity to raise issues regarding continued use of cash
collateral for the period of Sept. 1 through Jan. 31, 2019, the
Debtor is requesting that the Court set a final hearing on the use
of cash collateral in accordance with the budget during the first
week of September, if necessary.

The Debtor is additionally requesting that it be authorized to pay
the prepetition costs for the forensics computer expert that had
been involved in the Commercial Litigation -- Rodeo Roofing LLC v.
Commercial Roofing Solutions Inc., an Oregon corporation, Kenneth
Burns, and individual, Shelley Whittaker, an individual, and Dillon
Whittaker, and individual, Case No. 17CV13597, which is currently
pending in the Circuit Court of Oregon in Clackamas Oregon.  The
Debtor's complaint in the Commercial Litigation prays for damages
in the amount of $2,000,000.

The Debtor believes that these Creditors are potentially holding a
secured position in case collateral: Secured Lender Solutions; the
Internal Revenue Service; Corp. Service Comp., which Debtor
believes is a nominee of GTR Source LLC (Lienholder 91542677);
State of Oregon Department of Revenue; and ML Factors.

As of the Petition Date of the Case, the Debtor's cash collateral
was limited to its account receivables, which totaled $358,397.
Based on the cash collateral available as of the date of the
Petition, it would appear that there is collateral only for the
liens of the IRS and Lienholder 91542677.  As such, only the IRS
and Lienholder 91542677 would appear to be entitled to any type of
adequate protection with regard to their security, and the value of
Lienholder 91542677's secured position would appear to be limited
to $71,494.

Accordingly, the Debtor seeks approval for use of the cash
collateral, on the following terms:

     (1) The Cash Collateral Lienholders will be provided a
replacement lien in post-petition cash collateral pursuant to Code
Section 361(a)(1), equal to the value of their collateral as of the
Petition Date.

     (2) The Debtor will, upon written request, provide to the Cash
Collateral Lienholders all interim statements and operating reports
required to be submitted to the U.S. Trustee, as such reports are
submitted to the US Trustee, and monthly cash flow reports, broken
down by the expense line items contained in the Budget, within
twenty days after the end of each calendar month.

     (3) The Debtor reserves the right they may have to object to
the claims of the, and to object to the validity, priority and
extent of Cash Collateral Lienholders' liens, if any, encumbering
the Debtor's assets.

     (4) The Debtor reserves the right to seek, if necessary, Court
authority for use of the Cash Collateral Lienholders' Cash
Collateral on terms different from those contained in this Motion.

     (5) To the extent provided by contract or statute, the Cash
Collateral Lienholders will have the right to inspect the
collateral for their loans and the books and records maintained by
the Debtor with respect thereto during the Debtors' normal business
hours, after not less than two business days' notice to the Debtor,
provided that, in so doing, that the Cash Collateral Lienholders do
not unreasonably interfere with the Debtor's business operations.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/waeb18-02005-18.pdf

                        About Rodeo Roofing

Rodeo Roofing LLC was formed on Oct. 12, 2012 under the laws of the
state of Oregon to engage in the sale service and installation of
roofing for commercial buildings.  During that time it has operated
both as the principal contractor on roofing jobs, and as a
sub-contractor for other general contractors.  During the years
2013 through 2017, Rodeo reported total gross income of $13.57
million and a net loss of $643,000.  The principal shareholders are
Mr. Brian Fleming and Ms. Pamela Fleming, each of whom hold a 50.0%
of the ownership interest.  As of the bankruptcy filing, the
Company had 40 employees.

Rodeo Roofing filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Wash. Case
No. 18-02005) on July 16, 2018.  In the petition signed by Brian
Fleming, president and managing member, the Debtor estimated less
than $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  The Hon. Frank L. Kurtz presides over the case.
Metiner G. Kimel, Esq., at Kimel Law Offices, serves as bankruptcy
counsel.  No official committee of unsecured creditors has been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT INT'L: Moody's Assigns Ba3 CFR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned first-time ratings to
Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. including a Corporate Family
Rating of Ba3, Probability of Default Rating of Ba3-PD, senior
unsecured rating of B2 and Speculative Grade Liquidity rating of
SGL-2. The rating outlook is stable.

The rating assignments follow the company's plan to issue $350
million of senior unsecured notes to repay existing debt. The
company will also arrange a new term loan and revolving credit
facility, both unrated, in connection with the issuance of these
new notes, which will provide capital structure flexibility.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The assigned ratings consider the benefits of SWM's revenue
diversification strategy initiated in 2013 with the acquisition of
DelStar, Inc., a custom manufacturer of plastic/resin-based
materials focused primarily on water filtration. Adding specialty
materials products to its traditional portfolio of cigarette papers
and reconstituted tobacco products was important due to the secular
decline of the cigarette industry. Nonetheless, despite the slow
decline, the relative stability provided by the high margin, high
free cash flow Engineered Papers segment will continue to help fund
SWM's growth and diversification. Expansion of the Advanced
Materials & Structures segment should enhance consolidated margins
due to solid organic growth prospects from several of its end
markets as well as the benefits of greater scale and scope.
Consolidated operations produce competitive EBITDA margins in the
20% range and annual free cash flow (cash flow from operations less
capital expenditures less dividends) approximating $50 million,
supportive of the rating assignments. The acquisition-driven growth
and diversification strategy has been mostly debt-funded, however,
application of free cash flow to debt repayment has leveled
debt-to-EBITDA to the mid-3x range at June 30, 2018.

The ratings also consider the company's modest scale and potential
operational and financial uncertainty stemming from the likelihood
of additional acquisitions to further grow the Advanced Materials &
Structures segment. However, the company's transformation via
debt-financed acquisitions has been fairly measured to date and
Moody's anticipates that the company will continue to reduce debt
following larger acquisitions to restore debt-to-EBITDA to
pre-transaction levels in a timely manner. The rating assignments
also reflect the expectation that the company will continue to be
able to offset increases in costs of key raw materials, such as
plastic resin and wood pulp, as these occur, to mitigate downward
pressure on earnings.

Moody's believes that SWM has reached an important juncture having
established better balance between its two operating segments but
expects acquisition-driven growth will remain a key element to
diversifying away from tobacco-related revenues. At the same time,
Moody's expects the company to exercise restraint regarding its
growth and diversification strategy with acquisition activity
maintained at a measured pace consistent with its scale. Moody's
anticipates debt-to-EBITDA to remain below 4x, absent an
unexpectedly large transaction, allowing adequate financial
flexibility to execute organic growth initiatives.

A strong market position supported by the company's low ignition
propensity cigarette paper as well as more recent product
developments such as heat-not-burn cigarettes have helped slow the
decline in tobacco-related revenues. Additionally, several key end
markets tied to the Advanced Materials & Structures segment are
experiencing favorable fundamentals, including filtration,
transportation and infrastructure where revenue growth should
comfortably exceed the growth rate of GDP through 2019.

SWM's SGL-2 Speculative Grade Liquidity rating signifies good
liquidity with Moody's expectations for cash in the $40 - $50
million range and annual free cash flow to exceed $50 million,
before contributions from future acquisitions. Moody's expects the
company to arrange a $500 million senior secured revolving credit
facility expiring in 2023. With solid free cash flow, revolving
availability is expected to increase from approximately $400
million at transaction close, barring an acquisition that exceeds
cumulative free cash flow. The proposed facility is expected to
include financial maintenance covenants, including a maximum net
leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. Following the
completion of the proposed financings, the first debt maturity will
be in 2023 with only annual amortization payments on the new term
loan of less than $2 million.

The rating outlook is stable with Moody's expectations for
GDP-level top-line growth highlighted by flat-to-marginally higher
Engineered Paper sales and 3%+ organic growth in Advanced Materials
& Structures revenues. The stable outlook anticipates margin
improvement led by increasing growth opportunities, product
innovation and cost reduction initiatives within the Advanced
Materials & Structures segment. The stable outlook also anticipates
SWM will maintain good liquidity and that if larger debt-financed
acquisitions are made, its solid free cash flow will restore
balance sheet flexibility relatively quickly.

Higher than anticipated margin expansion and free cash flow,
boosted by renewed strength in tobacco-related revenues and/or
accelerating growth prospects in the Advanced Materials &
Structures end markets could result in an upgrade. Free cash
flow-to-debt approaching double-digits and debt-to-EBITDA below
3.5x while executing acquisitions would be important for an
upgrade. The ratings could be downgraded if Engineered Papers
resumes a sharp decline in results, placing added pressure on
Advanced Materials & Structures to generate outsized growth.
Additionally, the inability to sustain an EBITDA margin above 18%,
debt-to-EBITDA below 4.25x or free cash flow-to-debt above 5% could
also lead to negative ratings pressure.

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. is a producer of specialty
materials focused on resin-based nets, films and other non-wovens
through its Advanced Materials & Structures segment and fiber-based
cigarette papers and reconstituted tobacco products through its
Engineered Papers segment. Latest twelve month revenues for the
period ending June 30, 2018 were approximately $1 billion.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global
Manufacturing Companies published in June 2017.

Moody's took the following rating actions on Schweitzer-Mauduit
International, Inc.:

  - Corporate Family Rating assigned at Ba3

  - Probability of Default Rating assigned at Ba3-PD

  - Senior unsecured notes assigned at B2 (LGD5)

  - Speculative Grade Liquidity rating assigned at SGL-2

  - Rating outlook stable


SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT INT'L: S&P Assigns 'BB-' ICR, Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB-' issuer credit rating to
Schweitzer-Mauduit International Inc. (SWM). The outlook is
stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we also assigned our 'B+' issue-level
and '5' recovery ratings to the company's proposed $350 million
senior unsecured notes due in 2026. The '5' recovery rating
indicates our expectation for modest recovery (10%-30%; rounded
estimate: 10%) in the event of default."

The ratings on Alpharetta, GA-based SWM reflect its limited revenue
base and scale among peers, exposure to cyclical end markets and a
declining tobacco market, patent risk, exposure to volatility in
resin and wood pulp pricing, higher customer concentration within
its engineered papers (EP) segment, revenue concentration in the
U.S., and commitment to its dividend. The ratings also consider its
good profitability among peers, strong market positions with many
of its primary products, engineering expertise, increasing
diversity away from tobacco related markets, and good cash flows.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that SWM
will focus its free cash flows on investments in its AMS segment,
initiatives to reduce costs within its EP segment, and debt
reduction. We also expect the company to maintain its dividend as
long as cash flows continue to support such payments with FFO to
debt of 20%-30%.

"We could lower the rating if FFO to debt approaches 20% and
adjusted debt to EBITDA climbs above 4x with no clear prospects for
recovery. This could occur if the company cannot maintain its
EBITDA margins amid a broader economic decline or if the company
engages in aggressive debt-financed acquisitions that fail to
perform in line with the company's expectations.

"We could raise the rating if the company sustains FFO to debt
above 30%, which would likely occur if the company continues to
generate stable cash flows and pay down debt. The upgrade would
also require a demonstrated commitment to maintain such leverage
and adequate liquidity."



SHARING ECONOMY: EC Tech Inks Services Agreement with Coassets
--------------------------------------------------------------
EC Technology & Innovations Limited entered into a services
agreement with Coassets International Pte Ltd. on Sept. 6, 2018.
Pursuant to the Agreement, CAI will provide EC Tech with financial
technology services in consideration for 330,650 of shares of
common stock of Sharing Economy International Inc. at a par value
of US$0.001 per share.

EC Tech engages in technology investments and development and is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Sharing Economy International Inc.

CAI provides financial technology services and is a wholly owned
subsidiary of CoAssets Limited, whose shares are listed on the
Australian Securities Exchange.

CAI has been providing EC Tech with services including, but not
limited to, block-chain consultancy, ground work preparation for
online platform and other related services since March 1, 2018.

CAI will provide EC Tech with the Services to complete the ground
work preparation for EC Tech to build an online platform based on
Block-Chain technology in order to maximize system security,
privacy and standardize business operation flow and to enable
unified operation flow between business and currency.

A full-text copy of the Services Agreement is available at:

                       https://is.gd/qtSn57

                       About Sharing Economy

Headquartered in Jiangsu Province, China, Sharing Economy
International Inc. -- http://www.seii.com/-- through its
affiliated companies, designs, manufactures and distributes a line
of proprietary high and low temperature dyeing and finishing
machinery to the textile industry.  The Company's latest business
initiatives are focused on targeting the technology and global
sharing economy markets, by developing online platforms and rental
business partnerships that will drive the global development of
sharing through economical rental business models.  

Throughout 2017, the Company made significant changes in the
overall direction of the Company.  Given the headwinds affecting
its manufacturing business, the Company is targeting high growth
opportunities and has established new business divisions to focus
on the development of sharing economy platforms and related rental
businesses within the company.  These initiatives are still in an
early stage.  The Company did not generate significant revenues
from its sharing economy business initiatives in 2017.

RBSM LLP's audit opinion included in the company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017 contains a going concern
explanatory paragraph stating that the Company had a loss from
continuing operations for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017 and expects
continuing future losses, and has stated that substantial doubt
exists about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
RBSM has served as the Company's auditor since 2012.

Sharing Economy incurred a net loss of $12.92 million in 2017 and a
net loss of $11.67 million in 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Sharing
Economy had $74.97 million in total assets, $9.83 million in total
liabilities and $65.13 million in total stockholders' equity.


SOUTHEASTERN GROCERS: Must Pay Rent Based on Total Gross Revenues
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Mary F. Walrath addresses the issue of what
constitutes Gross Sales under leases for two stores operated by
Debtors Southeastern Grocers, LLC and affiliates for purposes of
the calculation of percentage rent under the Leases. The Debtors
contend that the term includes only the net revenues they receive
from certain ancillary services that they allow at their stores
while the Landlords contend that the term includes the gross
revenues generated by those services, even though the Debtors pass
on the vast majority of those revenues to others.

Upon deliberation, the Court finds that the plain language of the
Leases mandates that the Debtors pay percentage rent based on the
total gross revenues for the ancillary services.

The dispute with respect to both leases is the calculation of Gross
Sales (on which percentage rent is calculated). The issue is
whether Gross Sales include the total paid by customers for certain
ancillary services offered by the Debtors in their stores or only
the amount of fees which the Debtors actually receive for allowing
those services to be provided in the stores.

Commodore Realty, Inc., as the property manager for the Landlords
at Store Nos. 328 (the "Tavernier Lease") and 2448 (the "Palmetto
Lease"), contends that the gross amount of funds generated by those
services must be included under the plain language of the leases.
The Debtors argue that those service revenues are not to be
included in its gross rent calculation because it receives only a
small fee for those services, with the bulk of the revenues going
to others.

The Court concludes that the leases are unambiguous and that the
definition of Gross Sales under both include the total revenues
from the Store Services that the Debtors contend should be
excluded. Both leases define Gross Sales to include the gross
amount realized from the sale of goods or provision of services
(whether done by the Debtors or others) on the leased premises. The
Store Services fit within that broad definition.

Thus, Court holds that the Gross Sales calculation in both the
Tavernier and Palmetto Leases must include the gross revenues
generated by the Store Services.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated Sept. 6, 2018 is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb18-10700-706.pdf

                 About Southeastern Grocers

Southeastern Grocers, LLC, (SEG), the parent company and home of
BI-LO, Fresco y Mas, Harveys Supermarket and Winn-Dixie grocery
stores, is one of the largest conventional supermarket companies in
the U.S. SEG grocery stores, liquor stores and in-store pharmacies
serve communities throughout the seven southeastern states of
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina
and South Carolina.  BI-LO, Fresco y Mas, Harveys Supermarket and
Winn-Dixie are well known and well-respected regional brands with
deep heritages, strong neighborhood ties, proud histories of giving
back, talented and caring associates and strong commitments to
providing the best possible quality and value to customers.  Their
Web sites are http://www.bi-lo.com/,http://www.frescoymas.com/,
http://www.harveyssupermarkets.com/and http://www.winndixie.com/

BI-LO and its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
on March 23, 2009 (Bankr. D. S.C. Case No. 09-02140).  BI-LO
emerged from bankruptcy in May 2010 with Lone Star Funds remaining
as majority owner.

Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 05-11063, transferred April 14, 2005, to Bankr.
M.D. Fla. Case Nos. 05-03817 through 05-03840) on Feb. 21, 2005.

In December 2011, BI-LO Holdings signed a deal to acquire all of
the outstanding shares of Winn-Dixie Stores stock in a merger.
Holdings was later renamed Southeastern Grocers.

On March 27, 2018, Southeastern Grocers, LLC, and 26 affiliated
debtors sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
18-10700).  SEG commenced Chapter 11 cases to seek confirmation of
a prepackaged chapter 11 plan that will cancel their unsecured
notes in exchange for 100% of the equity of the reorganized
company.

The Debtors have requested joint administration of the cases.  The
Honorable Mary F. Walrath oversees the cases.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP is serving as legal counsel to the
Debtors, Evercore is serving as their investment banker, and FTI
Consulting Inc. as restructuring advisor.  Prime Clerk LLC is the
claims and noticing agent and administrative advisor.

Morrison & Foerster LLP is serving as legal counsel and Moelis &
Company LLC is serving as financial advisor to an ad hoc group of
holders of Unsecured Notes and 9.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2019.


STEADYMED LTD: Suspending Filing of Reports with the SEC
--------------------------------------------------------
SteadyMed Ltd. has filed a Form 15 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission to terminate the registration of the Company's ordinary
shares, par value NIS 0.01 per share, and to suspend the Company's
reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                       About SteadyMed

SteadyMed Ltd. -- http://www.steadymed.com/-- is a specialty
pharmaceutical company focused on the development of drug products
to treat orphan and high value diseases with unmet parenteral
delivery needs.  The Company's lead drug product candidate is
Trevyent, a development stage drug product that combines
SteadyMed's PatchPump technology with Treprostinil, a vasodilatory
prostacyclin analogue to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension
(PAH).  SteadyMed has offices in San Ramon, California and Rehovot,
Israel.

SteadyMed incurred a net loss of US$23.20 million in 2017 following
a net loss of US$25.86 million in 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, the
Company had US$27.83 million in total assets, US$23.51 million in
total liabilities and US$4.31 million in total shareholders'
equity.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Kost
Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, a member of Ernst & Young Global, the
company's auditor since 2012, on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, includes an
explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has recurring losses
from operations that raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


STONEMOR PARTNERS: Jeffrey DiGiovanni Appointed as GP's CAO
-----------------------------------------------------------
StoneMor GP LLC, the general partner of StoneMor Partners L.P., has
appointed Jeffrey DiGiovanni as chief accounting officer.
Concurrently with Mr. DiGiovanni's appointment, David A. Sheaffer
ceased to serve as StoneMor GP's principal accounting officer.

Mr. DiGiovanni, age 41, served as a managing director of Pine Hill
Group from January 2012 until joining StoneMor GP, where he worked
with clients to deliver services including readiness for initial
public offerings, financial reporting including reporting to the
Securities and Exchange Commission and technical accounting
assistance on complex transactions.  Prior to joining Pine Hill
Group, Mr. DiGiovanni's professional career included years in
public accounting, working at top-tier public accounting firms.
Specifically, his responsibilities included financial statement
review, consultation on complex accounting and reporting matters,
including mergers and acquisitions, capital market transactions,
mortgage banking activities and SEC reporting requirements.  He
holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting and a Master of
Science in Financial Services from Saint Joseph's University and is
a Certified Public Accountant.

In connection with Mr. DiGiovanni's appointment as chief accounting
officer, StoneMor GP and Mr. DiGiovanni entered into a letter
agreement, dated Sept. 5, 2018, contingent upon satisfactory
completion of its standard pre-hire requirements and the execution
of a Confidentiality, Nondisclosure, and Restrictive Covenant
Agreement as condition of employment.  The Letter Agreement
contemplates that Mr. DiGiovanni will be entitled to receive base
salary of $250,000 and, for each calendar year of employment, will
have an opportunity to earn an annual incentive bonus with a target
bonus equal to 25% of Base Salary.  The actual incentive bonus
awarded is discretionary and will be based on the Partnership's
performance against performance targets established by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of StoneMor GP as
well as mutually agreed upon personal performance goals.  In
addition, Mr. DiGiovanni will be eligible to receive, on an annual
basis, long-term equity incentive awards, currently targeted at 25%
of Base Salary, subject to the Compensation Committee's approval.
Half (50%) of any those awards will vest ratably over 3 years and
the other half (50%) will vest based upon performance criteria to
be determined by the Compensation Committee.

                     About StoneMor Partners

StoneMor Partners L.P., headquartered in Trevose, Pennsylvania --
http://www.stonemor.com/-- is an owner and operator of cemeteries
and funeral homes in the United States, with 322 cemeteries and 93
funeral homes in 27 states and Puerto Rico.  StoneMor is the only
publicly traded death care company structured as a partnership.
StoneMor's cemetery products and services, which are sold on both a
pre-need (before death) and at-need (at death) basis, include:
burial lots, lawn and mausoleum crypts, burial vaults, caskets,
memorials, and all services which provide for the installation of
this merchandise.

Stonemor reported a net loss of $75.15 million on $338.2 million of
total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net
loss of $30.48 million on $326.2 million of total revenues for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of Dec. 31, 2017, Stonemor had $1.75
billion in total assets, $1.66 billion in total liabilities and
$91.69 million in total partners' capital.

                           *    *    *

In April 2018, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'CCC+' corporate
credit rating on StoneMor Partners L.P.  S&P said, "The rating
affirmation reflects our expectation that the company can generate
operating cash flow of approximately $25 million in 2018 to support
operating needs for at least another year."


TAG MOBILE: Committee Objects to Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------
The Official Unsecured Creditors Committee filed an objection to
TAG Mobile, LLC's disclosure statement dated July 27, 2018.

The Committee complains that the projections in the disclosure
statement appear to be on a cash basis. However, the court-filed
operating reports are on accrual basis. Creditors are unable to
easily compare the Debtor’s projections with past performance.
All historical information should be presented on a cash basis to
compare the projections with actual performance.

The disclosure statement refers to pending litigation with SSB
Trading. The disclosure statement states that SSB is to have an
allowed claim of a certain amount. However, it does not say what
will happen to the pending litigation under the plan. The Debtor
should clarify the ultimate proposed disposition of this
litigation.

There is also no description or evaluation of possible Chapter 5
claims. (These would be creditors who may have been paid shortly
before the case was filed or during the gap period). TAG should be
required to list all such claims and the proposal, if any, for
pursuing the claims.

A copy of the Committee's Objection is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb17-33791-11-159.pdf

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that all General
Unsecured Creditors with Allowed Claims of $5,000 or less or any
General Unsecured Creditor of $5,001 or more who elects to be
treated as a Class 7 Claimant, will be paid 25% of their Allowed
Claim in 12 equal payments. The first payment 60 days after the
Effective Date and continue monthly thereafter, subject to the
provision of the potential sale under the Plan. Based upon the
Debtor's Schedules the total amount of Class 7 creditors should not
exceed $135,000. In the event of a sale, the Class 7 creditors will
be paid in accordance with their Priority under the Code from the
assets of the Debtor.

Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors:

     Robert M. Nicoud, Jr., Esq.
     Nicoud Law
     10440 N. Central Expressway, Suite 800
     Dallas, TX 75231
     Tel: (214) 540-7542
     Fax: (214) 265-6501 fax
     Email: rmnicoud@dallas-law.com

                       About TAG Mobile

Founded in 2010, Tag Mobile, LLC's line of business includes
providing two-way radiotelephone communication services such as
cellular telephone services.

On Feb. 2, 2018, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas issued an order converting Tag Mobile's case from
Chapter 7 to Chapter 11 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-33791).

Judge Stacey G. Jernigan presides over the case.  

The Debtor hired Eric A. Liepins, P.C. as its bankruptcy counsel,
and The Gibson Law Group as its special counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on April 11, 2018.


TAG MOBILE: Creditors Seek Amendment of Plan and Disclosures
------------------------------------------------------------
Creditors Kansas Corporation Commission and GVNW Consulting, Inc.
object to the adequacy of the disclosure statement submitted by
Debtor TAG Mobile, LLC along with its proposed Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization.

The creditors contend that the disclosure statement does not
provide adequate information to allow creditors to cast an informed
vote on the Plan, and so cannot be approved.

A fundamental deficiency is that the Debtor's disclosure statement
describes a plan anticipating a sale of Debtor's primary assets
(its licenses), and explains a Motion to Sell is being filed
"contemporaneously" with the disclosure statement, but there is no
Motion to Sell. There is no Asset Purchase Agreement for the
creditors to review, either in draft or final form. Thus, the sale
that the Debtor acknowledges is a "fundamental component of the
Plan" is not meaningfully described to the creditors asked to vote
on the Plan, or to the Court that the Debtor asks to approve the
sale as part of the Plan confirmation process.

A second deficiency in the disclosure statement is the failure to
explain the gross discrepancy between: (1) the price to be paid by
SSB for the Debtor's licenses, which the Debtor says is $175,000,
to be paid first to administrative creditors, priority tax
creditors, and any secured creditors, and (2) the much higher
distributions the Debtor proposes to make to general unsecured
creditors (Class 8) over time if there is no sale and the Debtor
continues in its present business ($15,000 a month for 120 months,
totaling $1.8 million, which is separate from the additional
amounts paid to administrative, priority, and secured creditors).
While the Debtor may have some other marketable asset that could
partially bridge the gap between resolution (1) and resolution (2),
the Disclosure Statement offers no information for creditors to
evaluate that possibility. The Disclosure Statement should be
amended to provide any explanation for why a sale of licenses for
such a minimal amount (forcing the Debtor to cease operations) is
the Debtor's first objective while continuing in business is only a
back-up if there is no sale. If SSB is correct that a Plan that
pays $1.8 to general unsecured creditors (as well as paying other
creditors) through continued operations is not a feasible option,
because the Debtor has been losing money each month in Chapter 11,
then the Debtor should amend the disclosure statement and plan to
propose a more feasible resolution.

A third deficiency in the disclosure statement is the failure to
adequately describe the treatment of two major claims which may
absorb much of the bankruptcy estates assets, SSB’s own claim and
the secured claim of Prosperity Bank. The disclosure statement’s
description of the treatment of SSB’s claim is full of
contingencies and internal contradictions that make its essentially
undecipherable.

A full-text copy of the Creditors' Objection is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb17-33791-11-161.pdf

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that the sale of
the Debtor's Licenses is a fundamental component of the Plan. The
confirmation of the Plan will serve as a Court finding that the
Debtor has determined in the exercise of their reasonable business
judgment to sell its Licenses. Debtor has demonstrated good,
sufficient and sound business reasons and justification for the
Licenses as requested in the Plan. The sale of the Licenses is in
the best interests of the Debtor, its estate and its creditors. The
consideration to be paid constitutes adequate and fair value for
the Debtor's interest in the Licenses. The sale of the Licenses was
negotiated and entered into in good faith and from arm's-length
positions between the Debtor and the purchaser.

Attorneys for Creditors GVNW Consulting, Inc. and Kansas
Corporation Commission:

     Weldon Moore, Esq.
     Sussman & Moore, LLP
     4645 N. Central Expressway, Suite 300
     Dallas, TX 75205
     Tel: (214) 378-8270
     Fax: (202) 378-8290
     Email: wmoore@csmlaw.net

        -- and --

     James H. Lister, Esq.
     Birch, Horton, Bittner & Cherot, P.C.
     1100 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 825
     Washington, D.C. 20036
     Tel: (202) 659-5800
     Fax: (202) 659-1027
     Email: jlister@dc.bhb.com

                    About TAG Mobile

Founded in 2010, Tag Mobile, LLC's line of business includes
providing two-way radiotelephone communication services such as
cellular telephone services.

On Feb. 2, 2018, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas issued an order converting Tag Mobile's case from
Chapter 7 to Chapter 11 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-33791).

Judge Stacey G. Jernigan presides over the case.  

The Debtor hired Eric A. Liepins, P.C. as its bankruptcy counsel,
and The Gibson Law Group as its special counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on April 11, 2018.


TAG MOBILE: SSB Opposses Approval of Proposed Plan Outline
----------------------------------------------------------
SSB Trading, Inc., submits an objection to Tag Mobile, LLC's
disclosure statement explaining its proposed chapter 11 plan.

SSB asserts that the Court should not approve a disclosure
statement for a plan that is unconfirmable on its face because it
would be a waste of resources and confusing to creditors to solicit
votes on a plan that cannot be confirmed.

The Plan describes an agreement to sell the Debtor's Licenses to
SSB that has since fallen apart. It would clearly be confusing to
creditors to solicit votes on a Plan that proposes an agreement
that does not exist and a sale that will not go forward on the
disclosed terms. On this basis alone, the Court should decline to
approve the Disclosure Statement.

Moreover, as is explained in SSB's Motion to Convert this case to
Chapter 7, the sale described by the Debtor in the Plan and
Disclosure Statement fails to disclose that SSB is in fact willing
to pay significantly more than the $175,000 identified for the
Licenses and it is the Debtor that has impeded a sale that would
bring more to the estate instead favoring a structure that provides
more benefit to insiders of the Debtor. In a straight sale, subject
to Court and regulatory approval, SSB would pay $750,000 for the
Licenses to the bankruptcy estate. The Debtor's failure to present
such sale and preference for a structure that brings only $175,000
to the estate is evidence of a failure to fulfill the fiduciary
duty owed by the Debtor's principal to the estate, and, if the
Court does not grant the Motion to Convert, the Court should deny
approval of the Disclosure Statement and terminate the Debtor's
exclusivity to present a plan.

In sum, the Disclosure Statement describes an unconfirmable Plan
that (a) presents an agreed sale where there is no agreement, (b)
fails to disclose that SSB would pay substantially more for the
Licenses, $750,000, which would be unencumbered cash to the estate,
(c) does not mention the absolute priority rule or present any
procedure or exception for dealing with it, (d) has no provision to
prevent foreclosure of a purported lien by Prosperity Bank, and (d)
is hopelessly infeasible unless the Court accepts the Debtor's
wildly inflated asset valuation and Plan Projections. Accordingly,
approval of the Disclosure Statement should be denied.

A full-text copy of SSB's Objection is available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb17-33791-11-160.pdf

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that the sale of
the Debtor's Licenses is a fundamental component of the Plan. The
confirmation of the Plan will serve as a Court finding that the
Debtor has determined in the exercise of their reasonable business
judgment to sell its Licenses. Debtor has demonstrated good,
sufficient and sound business reasons and justification for the
Licenses as requested in the Plan. The sale of the Licenses is in
the best interests of the Debtor, its estate and its creditors. The
consideration to be paid constitutes adequate and fair value for
the Debtor's interest in the Licenses. The sale of the Licenses was
negotiated and entered into in good faith and from arm's-length
positions between the Debtor and the purchaser.

Counsel for SSB Trading, Inc.:

     Christopher J. Moser, Esq.
     Timothy Andrew York, Esq.
     Charles F. Baum, Esq.
     QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS,
     WINSLETT & MOSER, P.C.
     2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800
     Dallas, Texas 75201
     Tel: (214) 871-2100
     Fax: (214) 871-2111

                    About TAG Mobile

Founded in 2010, Tag Mobile, LLC's line of business includes
providing two-way radiotelephone communication services such as
cellular telephone services.

On Feb. 2, 2018, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas issued an order converting Tag Mobile's case from
Chapter 7 to Chapter 11 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-33791).

Judge Stacey G. Jernigan presides over the case.  

The Debtor hired Eric A. Liepins, P.C. as its bankruptcy counsel,
and The Gibson Law Group as its special counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on April 11, 2018.


TEXAS PELLETS: Taps BDO USA as New Insurance Consultant
-------------------------------------------------------
Texas Pellets, Inc. and German Pellets Texas, LLC, seek approval
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas to
hire a new insurance consultant.

The Debtors propose to employ BDO USA, LLP to review and file their
insurance claims related to the fire incidents that occurred at its
pellet-storage facility in Port Arthur, Texas.  BDO USA will
replace Navigant Consulting, Inc.

Mark O'Rear and Jodi Hatherly, the BDO USA personnel who will be
providing the services, will charge $420 per hour and $350 per
hour, respectively.  These rates are the same rates that they
charged when they were still at Navigant.

Mr. O'Rear, a managing director of BDO USA, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm does not have any interest adverse to the
Debtors' estate, creditors or equity security holders.

BDO USA can be reached through:

     Mark O'Rear
     BDO USA, LLP
     2929 Allen Parkway, 20th Floor
     Houston, TX  77019-7100
     Phone: 713-960-1706
     Fax: 713-960-9549

                  About Texas Pellets, Inc.

Texas Pellets, Inc., based in Woodville, Texas, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 16-90126) on April 30, 2016.
The petition was signed by Anna Katherin Leibold, its president and
chief executive officer.

German Pellets Texas, LLC, also based in Woodville, Texas, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 16-90127) on April
30, 2016.  The petition was signed by Peter H. Leibold, its chief
executive officer.

The cases have been jointly administered under Texas Pellets'
case.

Judge Bill Parker presides over the cases.

The Debtors employed William Steven Bryant, Esq., at Locke Lord LLP
as their legal counsel; Searcy & Searcy, P.C. as local and
conflicts co-counsel; and Guggenheim Securities, LLC, and Configure
Partners, LLC, as investment bankers. Bryan M. Gaston, and the firm
Opportune, LLP, serve as the Debtors' Chief Restructuring Officer.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on May 17, 2016.  Counsel for the committee is
Patrick Kelley, Esq., at Ireland, Carroll & Kelly, P.C.  No trustee
or examiner has been appointed.


THREE CHIEFS: Taps Kogan Law Firm as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------
Three Chiefs and No Indians, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to hire
Kogan Law Firm, APC, as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the preparation and implementation of a
plan of reorganization; and provide other legal services related to
its Chapter 11 case.

Kogan Law Firm will charge these hourly rates:

     Michael Kogan, Esq.     $550
     Associate               $300

The firm received a pre-bankruptcy retainer in the sum of $25,000.

Michael Kogan, Esq., a principal of Kogan Law Firm, disclosed in a
court filing that his firm does not represent any entity having an
interest adverse to the Debtor.

The firm can be reached through:

     Michael S. Kogan, Esq.
     Kogan Law Firm, APC
     1849 Sawtelle Blvd., Suite 700
     Los Angeles, CA 90025
     Tel: 310-954-1690
     Email: mkogan@koganlawfirm.com

                About Three Chiefs and No Indians

Three Chiefs and No Indians, LLC -- http://www.americansample.com/
-- is a supplier of sample products to the decorative fabric,
hospitality, and contract fabric industry.  Its capabilities
include a full service art department, photography studio,
printing, and all facets of swatch technique options.  It is
headquartered in Ontario, California.

Three Chiefs and No Indians sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No. 18-17106) on Aug.
22, 2018.

In the petition signed by Christopher Muesse, general manager, the
Debtor disclosed $2,030,850 in assets and $1,781,894 in
liabilities.  

Judge Wayne E. Johnson presides over the case.


TRAVERSE MIDSTREAM: S&P Affirms 'B+' ICR, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B+' issuer credit rating on
Traverse Midstream Partners LLC. The outlook is stable. S&P said,
"At the same time, we affirmed our 'B+' issue-level rating on the
company's $1.4 billion senior secured term loan due in 2024 and
lowered the recovery rating to '4' from '3'. The '4' recovery
rating indicates our view that lenders can expect average
(30%–50%; rounded estimate: 40%) recovery if a payment default
occurs." The change in recovery rating is due to the incremental
debt that the company is raising.

The affirmation of the 'B+' issuer credit rating reflects S&P's
view that credit metrics will remain in line with its expectations
despite delayed cash flows and increased capital costs from Rover
Pipeline LLC. Traverse is seeking an amendment to the term loan B
to raise an additional $150 million. The proceeds will be used to
fund increased capital costs at Rover. The issuer credit rating
reflects differentiated credit quality between Traverse and that of
Rover and Ohio River System LLC, entities in which Traverse owns
respective stakes of 35% and 25%. There are no other substantive
assets at Traverse. The differential between the rating on Traverse
and the credit quality of Rover and Ohio River reflects the
structural subordination of Traverse's debt relative to underlying
cash flows at its investee companies, and leverage metrics at
Traverse. S&P views the underlying cash flows at Rover and Ohio
River as stable because they are highly contracted with either
take-or-pay agreements or minimum volume commitments. Offsetting
this is the low interest coverage at Traverse, which limits the
rating to 'B+'.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation of
predictable growth of distributions from both Rover and Ohio River
Systems from 2018 onward. We expect Traverse to have debt to EBITDA
leverage above 7.25x and interest coverage of 1.75x–2x through
2019.

"We could lower the ratings if distributions from Rover
deteriorates such that Traverse faced liquidity challenges. If
credit quality at Rover decreases significantly, resulting in
sustained leverage above 8x and interest coverage less than 1.5x,
we could take negative rating action. This could occur due to
construction or operational issues or a default by a large
counterparty.

"We do not anticipate a positive rating action. If Rover's
counterparties improve in credit quality or if interest coverage is
sustained above 3x, we could raise the rating.

"The recovery rating on Traverse's $1.4 billion senior secured term
loan is '4', indicating our expectation of average (30%-50%;
rounded estimate: 40%) recovery of principal if a payment default
occurs."

S&P Global Ratings' simulated default scenario assumes a default in
2022 that results from a sustained cyclical downturn in which
counterparties at Rover and Ohio River default and no longer
distribute the same cash flows to Traverse. S&P assumes Rover's
cash flows decrease by approximately 35% and that Ohio River is no
longer distributing cash flows, restricting Traverse's ability to
meet debt obligations.

Other key assumptions:

-- Simulated year of default: 2022
-- EBITDA multiple applied to investee companies: 7.5x
-- Cash flow decrease at Rover: 35%
-- Net enterprise value at default (5% administrative costs):
$695 million
-- First-lien secured debt (super priority revolver): $41 million
  
-- Recovery expectation: not applicable
-- Collateral value remaining for other secured creditors: $655
million
-- First-lien secured debt (term loan): $1.46 billion
    --Recovery expectations: 30%-50% (rounded estimate: 40%)

All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.


TRINITY 83 DEVELOPMENT: Hires Clingen Callow as Appeals Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Trinity 83 Development seeks approval from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern
Division, to employ Gregory Adamo and the firm of Clingen Callow &
McClean LLC to serve as special counsel.

The Debtor has participated in litigation regarding the extent and
priority of debt claims presented by Colfin Midwest Funding LLC
including as an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court and
through an appeal to the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois.  The District Court entered a ruling
dated May 3, 2018, that is adverse to the Debtor's position.
Subsequently, the Debtor filed a Notice of Appeal with the U.S.
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.  The Debtor requires the services
of experienced appellate counsel and proposes to employ Clingen
Callow, which possesses such experience, for that purpose.

A hearing on the employment application is set for Sept. 13 at
10:00 a.m.

Clingen Callow will charge for its legal services on an hourly
basis in accordance with its ordinary and customary hourly rates in
effect on the date the services are rendered.  The hourly rates
charged are:

     Partners and Counsel         $295 to $350
     Associates                   $190 to $275
     Paraprofessionals            $85  to $190

Mr. Adamo, who will lead the engagement, has an hourly billing rate
of $295 per hour.

Clingen Callow disclosed that the firm has represented Donald
Santacaterina, one of the Debtor's members as well as creditor, in
proceedings both before the Bankruptcy Court and in other courts.
Under the terms of U.S.C. section 327, such prior engagement is not
impediment to retaining Clingen Callow, the firm said.

Clingen Callow attests it has no other connection with creditors,
or any other party in interest, or their respective attorneys.

                About Trinity 83 Development

Trinity 83, Development, LLC, was formed in 2005.  It is a Limited
Liability Company formed under the laws of the State of Illinois.
Its members are, and always have been, Donald J. Santacaterina,
Thomas Connelly and George Yukich. In 2006 Trinity 83 constructed a
Class A, 12,500 square foot, masonry retail/office building at
19100 S. Crescent Dr, Mokena Illinois.   The building was
constructed as a "build to suit" for two tenants, namely Kids Can
Do, Inc., and Hair and Beauty Salon Suites of Mokena, Inc.  Both
tenants have occupied the building since 2006/07 and continue to do
so. At least some of the ownership of the tenants are related to
some of the members of Trinity 83.

Trinity 83 filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.S. Ill. Case No.
16-24652) on Aug. 1, 2016.  In the petition signed by Donald L.
Santacarina, member, the Debtor disclosed total assets at $2.41
million and total debt at $2.13 million at the time of the filing.
The case is assigned to Judge Deborah L. Thorne.  The Debtor is
represented by Gina B. Krol, Esq., at Cohen & Krol.  Trinity 83
also has hired Momkus McCluskey LLC as its special counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.



TRUE SECURITY: Hires Buechler & Garber as Bankruptcy Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
True Security, Inc. seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Colorado (Denver) to hire Buechler & Garber,
LLC as bankruptcy counsel.

The professional services that B&G is to render are:

     a. provide the Debtor with legal advice with respect to their
powers and duties;

     b. aid the Debtor in the development of a plan of
reorganization under Chapter 11;

     c. file the necessary petitions, pleadings, reports, and
actions which may be Chapter 11;

     d. take necessary actions to enjoin and stay until final
decree continuation of pending proceedings and to enjoin and stay
until final decree herein commencement of lien foreclosure
proceedings and all matters as may
be provided under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 362; and

     e. perform all other legal services for the Debtor which may
be necessary.

B&G was paid a retainer by the Debtor in the amount of $15,968.36.


Aaron A. Garber, Esq., partner with Buechler & Garber, LLC, attests
that the Firm is disinterested as defined by 11 U.S.C. Section
101(14) and does not have or represent an interest materially
adverse to the interest of the estate or of any class of creditors.


The counsel can be reached through:

    Aaron A. Garber, Esq.
    Buechler & Garber, LLC
    999 18th Street, Suite 1230S
    Denver, CO 80202
    Tel: (720) 381-0045
    Fax: (720) 381-0382
    Email: aaron@bandglawoffice.com

                      About True Security

True Security, Inc., provides security services in the Denver-metro
area.  True Security filed its voluntary petition pursuant to
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No.
18-17887) on Sept. 7, 2018, estimating under $1 million in assets
and liabilities.  Aaron A. Garber at Buechler & Garber, LLC, is the
Debtor's counsel.


VANGUARD HEALTH: Unsecured Claims Total $1MM Under Latest Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Vanguard Health & Wellness, LLC, submits an amended small business
disclosure statement describing its chapter 11 plan dated Sept. 4,
2018.

Under the latest plan, the secured claim of Lightstar Finances
Services, LLC is $34,428.48 instead of the $250,000 provided in the
previous plan.

Also, all unsecured claims allowed in excess of $15,000, now total
$1,004,308.29, to be paid 10 cents on the dollar, in 60 equal
monthly payments, starting on the Effective Date of the Plan. The
previous unsecured claims amount is $956,036.40.

A copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated Sept. 4, 2018 is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb17-04707-227.pdf

                   About Vanguard Health

Vanguard Health & Wellness LLC based in Des Plaines, IL, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 17-04707) on
February 17, 2017. The Hon. Jacqueline P. Cox presides over the
case. Xiaoming Wu, Esq., at Ledford Wu & Borges, LLC, to serve as
bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $568,946 in assets and $1.70
million in liabilities. The petition was signed by Michael Zayats,
president.


WALLACE RUSH: Court Junks Bid to Withdraw Reference of Tort Claims
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case caption IN RE: WALLACE, RUSH, SCHMIDT, INC., SECTION:
"S" (3), Civil Action No. 18-6851 (E.D. La.), District Judge Mary
Ann Vial Lemmon denied Wallace, Rush, Schmidt, Inc.'s motion for
order withdrawing the reference for contingent, unliquidated
personal injury and wrongful death claims.

WRS filed the case and motion seeking to withdraw the reference of
the tort claims to the bankruptcy court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
section 157(b)(5) so that those claims can proceed in the United
States District Court. Section 157(b)(5) provides: "[t]he district
court shall order that personal injury tort and wrongful death
claims shall be tried in the district court in which the bankruptcy
case is pending, or in the district court in the district in which
the claim arose, as determined by the district court in which the
bankruptcy case is pending." However, section 157(b)(5) "has
consistently been construed to recognize discretion in district
courts to leave personal injury cases where they are pending."  The
bankruptcy court has already lifted the stay as to the tort
claimants' personal injury suits. It would be a waste of judicial
resources to withdraw the reference to bankruptcy court as to
claims that are proceeding in the Louisiana state courts.

A copy of the Court's Order and Reasons dated August 22, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2N5bSCm from Leagle.com.

Wallace, Rush, Schmidt, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Phillip
Wallace -- kwallace@aol.com -- Phillip K. Wallace, Attorney at
Law.

Jennifer Guidry Chauvin, Individually and as the administrator of
the estate of Spencer Chauvin and as Tutrix of J.M.C. and J.L.C.,
Interested Party, represented by Barbara B. Parsons , The Steffes
Firm, LLC & H. Edward Sherman , H. Edward Sherman, APLC.

Rodrick Sherrod, Interested Party, represented by Kenneth H. Hooks,
III -- Kenny@dodsonhooks.com-- Dodson, Hooks & Frederick, APLC.

David Jones, Interested Party, represented by Barbara B. Parsons ,
The Steffes Firm, LLC &M. Paul Skrabanek , Pierce Skrabanek Bruera,
PLLC.

Solma Almendarez, Interested Party, represented by Barbara B.
Parsons , The Steffes Firm, LLC & Edward Lee Moreno , Law Office of
John W. Redmann, LLC.

               About Wallace, Rush, Schmidt

Wallace, Rush, Schmidt, Inc., doing business as Wallace Resource
Systems of Leachville, LLC, and Wallace Staffing and Labor, LLC, is
a personnel resource company specializing in Natural Disaster Clean
up/Recovery and Man-Made disasters which combined with its many
years of experience in disaster clean up and restoration,
supervision and administration expanding customer base.  The
company specializes in job management and labor services for
disaster restoration companies.  It serves its clients nationwide
24/7.

Wallace Rush sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No.
17-10698) on March 24, 2017.  In the petition signed by Eddie
Schmidt, vice president, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities in the range of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Jerry
A. Brown is assigned to the case.  The Debtor tapped Phillip K.
Wallace, Esq., at Phillip K. Wallace, PLC, as counsel.


WESTMORELAND COAL: Inks Second Amended Bridge Loan Agreement
------------------------------------------------------------
Westmoreland Coal Company executed on Sept. 7, 2018, an amendment
to its existing Bridge Loan Credit Agreement, dated May 21, 2018,
among the Company, Prairie Mines & Royalty ULC, Westmoreland San
Juan, LLC, certain subsidiaries of the Company, as guarantors, the
lenders and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB as administrative
agent.  The Second Amendment adjusted certain provisions of the
Bridge Loan Credit Agreement in order to permit the Company to
enter into a lease agreement with Komatsu Financial Limited
Partnership with respect to a capital lease at the Company's Coal
Valley facility.  A full-text copy of the Amended Bridge Loan
Credit Agreement is available for free at https://is.gd/Cab9I8

                      About Westmoreland Coal

Based in Englewood, Colorado, Westmoreland Coal Company --
http://www.westmoreland.com/-- is an independent coal company
based in the United States.  The Company produces and sells thermal
coal primarily to investment grade utility customers under
long-term, cost-protected contracts.  Its focus is primarily on
mine locations which allow it to employ dragline surface mining
methods and take advantage of close customer proximity through
mine-mouth power plants and strategically located rail
transportation.  At Dec. 31, 2017, the Company's U.S. coal
operations were located in Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, Texas,
New Mexico and Ohio, and its Canadian coal operations were located
in Alberta and Saskatchewan.  The Company sold 49.7 million tons of
coal in 2017.

Westmoreland Coal reported a net loss applicable to common
shareholders of $71.34 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, a
net loss applicable to common shareholders of $27.10 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, and a net loss applicable to common
stockholders of $213.6 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.
As of June 30, 2018 the Company had $1.45 billion in total assets,
$2.14 billion in total liabilities and a total deficit of $686.2
million.

Ernst & Young LLP's audit opinion included in the company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017 contains a
going concern explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has a
substantial amount of long-term debt outstanding, is subject to
declining industry conditions that are negatively impacting the
Company's financial position, results of operations, and cash
flows, and has stated that substantial doubt exists about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

                          *     *     *

In April 2018, Moody's Investors Service downgraded the ratings of
Westmoreland Coal Company, including its corporate family rating
(CFR) to 'Caa3' from 'Caa1'.  According to Moody's, the downgrade
reflects the company's weak liquidity position due to the near-term
maturity of its term loan.

As reported by the TCR on Sept. 11, 2018, S&P Global Ratings
withdrew its 'D' issuer credit rating on Westmoreland Coal Co. at
the issuer's request.  In June 2018, S&P Global Ratings lowered its
issuer credit rating on Westmoreland Coal to 'D' from 'SD'.  The
downgrade incorporates WCC's forbearance agreement.  Under S&P's
criteria, forbearance agreements related to missing payments
without appropriate compensation constitute a default.


WORLDSPACE INC: Court Dismisses Fraunhofer Suit vs Sirius XM
------------------------------------------------------------
Senior District Judge Joseph F. Bataillon granted Sirius XM Radio's
motion to dismiss the case captioned FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR
FORDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG E.V., Plaintiff, v. SIRIUS XM
RADIO INC., Defendant, No. 1:17CV184 (D. Del.). The Plaintiff's
objections are overruled.

MCM is the method used to transmit data which splits components and
sends them over separate carrier signals. Plaintiff developed
patented technology related to multicarrier modulation for use in
satellite radio broadcasting. On March 4, 1998, Fraunhofer entered
into an exclusive license agreement with WorldSpace International
Network Inc. to license all patents for MCM technologies.
Fraunhofer subsequently obtained U.S. Patent Nos. 6,314,289,
6,931,084, 6,993,084, and 7,061,997, which relate to MCM
technologies and are covered by the MCM License. Later, WorldSpace
gave a sublicense to XM Satellite, and XM used the license
technology to assist in the development of the XM DARS system. XM
then merged in 2008 with Sirius.
In 2008 WorldSpace filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy. A settlement
agreement was approved between WorldSpace, Fraunhofer, and Yamzi
and it rejected the MCM license.

The magistrate judge recommended that the court grant the motion to
dismiss and deny the motions to stay as moot.

The plaintiff objects to the recommendation to dismiss this case.
It argues that the magistrate judge is incorrect, as a sublicensor
cannot grant greater rights than those received in the original
license with the property owner. Plaintiff states that "[u]nder
SXM's theory, even though the patent rights that WorldSpace
received were expressly contingent on certain payments to
Fraunhofer, WorldSpace was somehow able to grant sublicense rights
to SXM that were free of any such contingency." Further, plaintiff
contends that the license and sublicense both expressly permit
termination. Plaintiff states in this regard that "[b]ut because
the patent rights in this case were indisputably executory in
nature, it is not appropriate to treat the granting of a sublicense
to SXM as a thing that was permanently transferred to SXM at the
time it entered into its agreement with WorldSpace."

Sirius counters these arguments, contending that Judge Fallon's
determination that as a matter of law, that SXM has a sublicense to
the Asserted Patents based on the express and unambiguous language
of the governing agreements should be affirmed. Sirius also argues
that Fraunhofer cannot recast its claims in an amended complaint,
as the same legal arguments will occur that have already been
decided by Judge Fallon.

A valid license is generally a complete defense to infringement.
The court agrees with the magistrate judge. As a matter of law,
WorldSpace granted SXM's predecessor a sublicense in 1998, and any
subsequent alleged loss of rights by WorldSpace does not change its
irrevocable rights under this agreement and license. The court
agrees that any attempt to amend the complaint would be futile.
Accordingly, the court will adopt the order of the magistrate judge
in its entirety.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum and Order dated August 22, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2MiNKqC from Leagle.com.

Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung der angewandten Forschung
e.V., Plaintiff, represented by Brian E. Farnan --
bfarnan@farnanlaw.com -- Farnan LLP, Alan J. Friedman --
afriedman@lwgfllp.com -- Lobel Weiland Golden Friedman LLP, pro hac
vice, Alexis P. Federico -- afederico@irell.com -- Irell & Manella
LLP, pro hac vice, Ben Yorks -- byorks@irell.com -- Irell & Manella
LLP, pro hac vice, David McPhie -- dmcphie@irell.com -- Irell &
Manella LLP, pro hac vice,Kamran Vakili -- kvakili@irell.com --
Irell & Manella LLP, pro hac vice & Michael J. Farnan --
mfarnan@farnnalaw.com -- Farnan LLP.

Sirius XM Radio Inc., Defendant, represented by Philip A. Rovner --
provner@potteranderson.com -- Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP,
Jonathan S. Caplan -- jcaplan@kramerlevin.com -- Kramer Levin
Naftalis & Frankel LLP, pro hac vice,Mark A. Baghdassarian --
mbaghdassarian@kramerlevin.com -- Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
LLP, pro hac vice & Shannon H. Hedvat -- shedvat@kramerlevin.com --
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, pro hac vice.

               About WorldSpace, Inc.

WorldSpace, Inc., provided satellite-based radio and data
broadcasting services to paying subscribers in 10 countries
throughout Europe, India, the Middle East, and Africa.  WorldSpace
was founded in 1990 and is headquartered in Silver Spring,
Maryland.

The Debtor and two of its affiliates filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del., Case Nos. 08-12412 through
08-12414) on Oct. 17, 2008.  James E. O'Neill, Esq., Laura Davis
Jones, Esq., and Timothy P. Cairns, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl
& Jones, LLP, serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  Kurtzman
Carson Consultants serves as claims and notice agent.  Neil Raymond
Lapinski, Esq., and Rafael Xavier Zahralddin-Aravena, Esq., at
Elliot Greenleaf, represent the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors.  When the Debtors filed for bankruptcy, they listed
total assets of $307,382,000 and total debts of $2,122,904,000.

WorldSpace completed the sale of substantially all assets related
to business effective June 23, 2010.  The assets were sold to a
company controlled by WorldSpace Chief Executive Officer Noah
Samara under a $5.5 million contract.  Samara had defaulted on a
prior contract to purchase the assets for $28 million.  The sale to
Samara was arranged after WorldSpace couldn't agree on a sale to
Liberty Satellite Radio LLC, which had been financing the Chapter
11 case.


YOGA80 INC: Seeks Final Approval on Cash Collateral Use
-------------------------------------------------------
Yoga80 Inc. seeks final authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of California to use cash collateral
during the pendency of its bankruptcy case.

The Debtor essentially has two operations: (i) a coffee cafe
located at 2727 Street, #100, Carlsbad, CA 92008; and (ii) a yoga
studio located at 11526 Sorrento Valley Road, San Diego, CA 92121.

There are eight potential secured creditors with interests in the
Debtor's cash collateral: (i) Buzz Culver; (ii) Joanne Edwards;
(iii) Larry Lessie; (iv) Molly Winders; (v) The Robert Pastor
Trust; (vi) Ted Townsend; (vii) Cal-Sorrento, Ltd.; and (viii)
Craig James Pastor.

The Debtor asserts that all secured creditors are adequately
protected because they retain their secured liens and preservation
of their rights is dependent on the ongoing operations of the
Debtor, as assets are far surpassed by secured debts.
The Debtor has not presented any further adequate protection
because the Debtor has reached agreements for the use of cash
collateral with each secured creditor. Pursuant to said agreement,
the Debtor will not be required to make any periodic payments in
exchange for use of cash collateral, and it is not anticipated that
any creditor will object in any way to the Debtor's request to use
its cash collateral.

Additionally, the Debtor claims that many of the secured creditors
are deemed insiders in that they are family members of the officers
of the Debtor.  As a result, it would likely be objectionable for
them to receive periodic cash payments or the equivalent during the
pendency of the Bankruptcy Case.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/casb18-04321-36.pdf

                        About Yoga80 Inc.

Yoga80 Inc.'s essentially has two operations: (i) a coffee cafe
located at 2727 State Street, #100, Carlsbad, CA 92008; and (ii) a
yoga studio located at 11526 Sorrento Valley Road, San Diego, CA
92121.

Yoga80 Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No.
18-04321) on July 20, 2018.  In the petition signed by CFO Robert
Bradley Pastor, the Debtor estimated less than $50,000 in assets
and $100,000 to $500,000 in liabilities.  VC Law Group, LLP, led by
Vikrant Chaudhry, Esq., serves as counsel to the Debtor.  No
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case.


YOSI SAMRA: Unsecureds to Recoup 15% Under Chapter 11 Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Yosi Samra, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization and
accompanying disclosure statement under which Jacob Samra, the
father of the Debtor's principal Yosi Samra, and junior debtor in
possession lender, will provide a "New Value Contribution" in the
form of securing payment of $700,000 to unsecured creditors (the
first $100,000 is paid by him in cash), and invest additional cash
funds sufficient to pay allowed administrative expense claims.  The
Reorganized Debtor will continue the Debtor's business operations,
servicing all of the Debtor's customers and using all of the
Debtor's suppliers.

Creditors of the Debtor receive the following treatment under the
Plan:

   * The holders of allowed Secured Claims other than Jacob Samra
will be paid in accordance with orders entered by the Bankruptcy
court during the case, or be provided other treatment as may be
agreed to by the holders.

   * The YSI Creditors' Trust will be established for the benefit
of holders of Class 5 Claims who are to receive a distribution.
These claims, if allowed, will receive a pro rata share of the "New
Value Contribution" of $700,000 for the benefit of unsecured
creditors who are to receive a Class 5 distribution as follows: (i)
a Pro Rata Share of $100,000 on the Effective Date less amounts
necessary to pay Class 6 (convenience class) claimants, and less a
reserve of $20,000 set aside to pay administrative expenses of the
YSI Creditors' Trust, and (ii) a Pro Rata Share of $120,000 on each
of the next five Annual Distribution Dates following the Effective
Date.

   * The $700,000 New Value Contribution will be secured by a
mortgage on a non-debtor asset, 1509 E. 17th Street, Brooklyn NY
11230. Should this property be sold, then at Jacob Samra's option,
he will either (i) pay the unpaid balance of the New Value
Contribution out of the proceeds of the sale upon closing, or (ii)
provide the YSI Creditors Trust a mortgage on the property at 1530
East Captian Dreyfus Avenue, Phoenix AZ 85022 as replacement
collateral. Neither property has any liens or mortgages at this
time. Any future mortgages or encumbrances on the properties will
be subordinate to the YSI Creditors Trust's mortgage.

   * General unsecured claims, classified in Class 5, total
approximately $4.672 million.
Class 5 dividend is approximately 15% if there all claims are
valid, and if there re no deficiency claims of secured creditors.
Class 5 creditors are given the option to consensually release
Released Parties from any causes of action, defenses, debts,
demands, damages, obligations, and liabilities of any kind or
nature whether under contract or tort, at law or in equity or
otherwise, known or unknown, contingent or matured, liquidated or
unliquidated, and all rights and remedies with respect thereto,
including any personal liability pursuant to a Guaranty.

      -- Class 5 creditors who (i) vote to accept the Plan or (ii)
abstain from voting without opting out of the release, are deemed
to consent to the Non-Debtor Release of the Released Parties. These
creditors receive their pro rata share of the New Value
Contribution.

      -- Class 5 creditors who (i) vote to reject the Plan or (ii)
abstain from voting and opt out of the release, are deemed to not
consent to the Non-Debtor Release. These creditors receive no
distribution under the Plan and are deemed to consent to this less
favorable treatment pursuant to section 1124(a)(4) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

   * Jacob Samra will receive 100% of the equity interests of the
Reorganized Debtor in exchange for providing the New Value
Contribution.

   * Equity interests in the Debtor are extinguished.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/ybqtk3yh from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                     About Yosi Samra Inc.

Yosi Samra Inc. -- https://www.yosisamra.com/ -- sells designer
brand footwear for women and kids famous for its fold-up ballet
flats.  Yosi Samra's runway-inspired styles have been featured in
Vogue, InStyle and Glamour Magazines and spotted on some of
fashion's most trend-setting celebrities, including Sarah Jessica
Parker, Anne Hathaway, and Halle Berry.  The Yosi Samra brand is
available in more than 1,000 boutiques across the U.S. and in 85
other countries, including 15 brand shops in Asia and The Middle
East.

Yosi Samra Inc. sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case
No. 17-12493) on Sept. 5, 2017, disclosing $1.5 million in assets,
and $6.28 million in liabilities as of Sept. 5, 2017.  Larry
Reines, its president, signed the petition.

Ballon Stoll Bader & Nadler P.C., in New York, serves as counsel to
the Debtor.  Savvy Fare, LLC serves as the new accountant to the
Debtor, replacing Danziger & Company, the Debtor's previous
accountant.

On Sept. 27, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Sullivan & Worcester
LLP is the Committee's legal counsel.



[*] George Barry Cauthen to Receive Bankruptcy Inn Alliance Award
-----------------------------------------------------------------
George Barry Cauthen has been selected to receive the 2018
Bankruptcy Inn Alliance Distinguished Service Award by the American
Inns of Court.  The award will be presented in San Antonio, Texas,
during the National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges in October.

Mr. Cauthen is a partner with Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough
LLP in Columbia, South Carolina, where he specializes in creditor
bankruptcy law.  He is a Certified Specialist in Bankruptcy Law by
the Supreme Court of South Carolina.  He has represented creditors
in bankruptcy and has appeared before the courts of more than a
dozen states.  Mr. Cauthen has also served as a bankruptcy
consultant to the courts of New York, Puerto Rico, the Slovak
Republic, the Republic of Macedonia, the Republic of Armenia, and
Bulgaria.

The South Carolina Bar Foundation honored Mr. Cauthen with its
DuRant Distinguished Public Service Award in 2016.  He also
received the J. Bratton Davis Professionalism Award from the South
Carolina Bankruptcy Law Association and an award from the
Turnaround Management Association for Non-Profit Company
Transaction of the Year.

After receiving his bachelor's degree, Mr. Cauthen served in the
U.S. Navy as a deck, gunnery and legal officer.  He earned his JD
from the University of South Carolina School of Law in 1976 and
served as a clerk to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of South
Carolina, from 1982 to 1989.  Mr. Cauthen returned to the
University of South Carolina to earn an MPA in 1984.

The Bankruptcy Inn Alliance Distinguished Service Award was
developed as a way to recognize ongoing dedication to the highest
standards of the legal profession, the rule of law, and the
demonstration of personal ethics and integrity as expressed in the
professional creed of the American Inns of Court, and specifically
dedicated to a judge or attorney who has practiced in the field of
bankruptcy law.

Headquartered in Alexandria, Virginia, The American Inns of Court
-- http://www.innsofcourt.org-- inspires the legal community to
advance the rule of law by achieving the highest level of
professionalism through example, education, and mentoring.  The
organization's membership includes more than 31,000 federal, state,
and local judges; lawyers; law professors; and law students in
nearly 380 chapters nationwide and more than 100,000 alumni
members.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2018.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***