---

         T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Thursday, March 28, 2019, Vol. 23, No. 86

                            Headlines

1515-GEENERGY: Seeks to Hire McLaughlin & Stern as Legal Counsel
792 RESTAURANT: Unsecured Creditors to Get 3.5% Under Ch. 11 Plan
ADVANCED PATIENT: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
ALEXANDER SEAWRIGHT: Emergency Bid for Imposition of Stay Tossed
ALFRED DESSELLE: Wants to Enter into Compromise Deal on Succession

AMERICAN GREEN: Sets Bidding Procedures for All Assets
ATLAS FINANCIAL: A.M. Best Lowers Financial Strength Rating to C+
AUM SHRI GANESHAY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
AVON PRODUCTS: S&P Puts 'B' ICR on CreditWatch Positive
BAUSERMAN SERVICE: Court Confirms Chapter 11 Plan

BIG COOP'S: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral Until March 25
BROOALEXA LLC: Case Summary & 8 Unsecured Creditors
BUCK SPRINGS: R. Garrison Seeks Rejection of Plan and Disclosures
BUILTRITE BUILDERS: Taps Wadsworth Warner as Legal Counsel
CERIDIAN HCM: Moody's Hikes CFR & Secured Credit Facilities to B2

CFO MANAGEMENT: Committee Seeks to Hire Singer & Levick as Counsel
CHAPARRAL CONCRETE: Seeks to Hire Eric A. Liepins as Legal Counsel
COLONIAL OAKS: B. Leitgeb Objects to Disclosure Statement
CONEX EQUIPMENT: Unsecureds to Get Full Payment in 16 Quarters
CORTLAND HABITATS: Visions Objects to Disclosure Statement

DECOR HOLDINGS: Gets Approval to Hire RAS Management, Appoint CRO
DECOR HOLDINGS: Taps Hahn & Hessen as Legal Counsel
DECOR HOLDINGS: Taps Halperin Battaglia as Conflicts Counsel
DECOR HOLDINGS: Taps SSG Advisors as Investment Banker
DIRECTVIEW HOLDINGS: Signs $5M Stock Purchase Agreement with Oasis

DLJ INVESTMENTS: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
DRIVE CHASSIS: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR & Rates $850MM Loan Caa1
DUMITRU MEDICAL: Unsecureds to Get 5% in 8 Quarterly Payments
E.W. SCRIPPS: S&P Rates New $525MM Sr. Sec. Debt 'BB'
ELMIRA, NY: S&P Affirms 'BB+' Long-Term Rating on GO Debts

ENERGY TRANSFER: Fitch Withdraws BB+ Rating on Remaining Sec. Notes
EXITO JC: Espinal Suit Alleges FLSA Violation
FANNIE MAE: Appoints Hugh Frater as CEO
FNJCC CORP: Plan, Disclosures Hearing Scheduled for April 25
FORD CHILDREN: Seeks to Hire Eric A. Liepins as Legal Counsel

GLYECO INC: Stockholders Elect 5 Directors at Annual Meeting
GREENHILL & CO: S&P Rates $360MM 1st-Lien Term Loan 'BB'
HIGHLAND SALONS: Authorized to Use Cash Collateral Until Aug. 31
HOOK AND BOIL: U.S. Trustee Objects to Plan Confirmation
ICONIX BRAND: Reports $69.1 Million Net Loss for Fourth Quarter

INSTALLED BUILDING: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms BB- ICR
JSS OF ALBUQUERQUE: Ct. Endorses Dismissal of NM Appeal as Moot
JUDY JAN DAVIS: Seeks to Hire Eric A. Liepins as Legal Counsel
KEANE GROUP: S&P Affirms 'B+' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
LGI HOMES: S&P Affirms 'BB-' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable

LITCHFIELD LASER: Unsecureds to Get 10% Dividend in 103 Months
LONESTAR II: Moody's Assigns Ba3 Ratings to $300 Secured Loans
MAJOR EVENTS: To Pay PA Revenue Department in Full at 6% Interest
MAMMOET-STARNETH: Adds Confirmation Injunction Provision in Plan
MANHATTAN JEEP: May 1 Plan Confirmation Hearing

NOBLE REY: Adds Provision to Plan Implementation
NOVAN INC: Incurs $12.7 Million Net Loss in 2018
O'HARE FOUNDRY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
OAKLAND PARK: Shareholder Files Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan
OAKLAND PHYSICIANS: M. Short Loses Partial Summary Judgment Bid

OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS: Class Plaintiffs Object to Disclosures
ORTEGA'S MEXICAN: Loses Clawback Suit vs Happy Rock Merchant
PEPPERTREE PARK: Liquidity Event Expected to Occur Late 2019
PS HOLDCO: S&P Affirms 'B+' Rating on $270MM First-Lien Term Loan
PURADYN FILTER: Reports $4.2 Million Net Sales for 2018

QEP RESOURCES: Moody's Confirms Ba3 CFR & Ba3 on $2.1BB Sr. Notes
RESURRECTION LIFE: Plan Adds Post-Petition Income, Expenses Report
REVOLUTION MONITORING: Medical Receivables to Fund Plan Payments
ROADHOUSE HOLDING: 3rd Cir. Upholds Dismissal of W. English Appeal
ROSLYN SEFARDIC: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor

SIX FLAGS: Moody's Rates Proposed $1.15-Bil. Secured Loans 'Ba1'
SOLERA PARENT: S&P Assigns B- Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
SPANISH TRAIL: Still Bound to Terms of STMA Agreement, Ct. Rules
SPYBAR MANAGEMENT: Taps Gensburg Calandriello as Legal Counsel
STAPLES INC: Moody's Rates $3.2BB Term Loan & $750MM Notes 'B1'

SURGERY CENTER: S&P Rates $430MM Unsec. Notes Refinancing 'CCC'
TEMPEST GROUP: April 30 Plan Confirmation Hearing
TPE INDUSTRIES: Automation Has $335K Accounts Receivables at Feb.28
TPE INDUSTRIES: Electric Settles $9-Mil. in Claims
TPE INDUSTRIES: Power to Expects to Pay $292K on Effective Date

TPE INDUSTRIES: Unsecured Creditors to Get $59K Over 3 Years
TREASURE ISLES: Taps HeplerBroom as Legal Counsel
TRUE SECURITY: Taps Wadsworth Garber as New Bankruptcy Counsel
VEROBLUE FARMS: April 17 Plan Confirmation Hearing
VPH PHARMACY: Court Junks Deven Patel Bid for TRO vs Citibank

WALKER MANAGEMENT: Ruling in Favor of Ambrosio Defendants Flipped
WAYNE BAILEY: Court Allows Objection to Kornegay's PACA Claim
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL: Completes Sale of Land Drilling Rigs
WESTERN HOST: Wants to Use Insurance Proceeds for Hotel Repairs
WET SEAL: Oak Point Buying Remnant Assets for $20K

WHIDBEY ISLAND HOSPITAL: Moody's Cuts 2009/2012 Bonds Rating to Ba1
WILKINSON FLOOR: Amends Plan to Include Strategic's Objections
WILLOWOOD USA: Proposes Sale of Substantially All Assets
[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings

                            *********

1515-GEENERGY: Seeks to Hire McLaughlin & Stern as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC and BBPC, LLC seek approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to hire
McLaughlin & Stern PLLC as their legal counsel.

The firm will provide legal advice regarding local rules and
practices and strategic advice on how to accomplish the Debtors'
goals in connection with the prosecution of their Chapter 11 cases;
represent them in negotiations with their creditors; prosecute or
defend actions to protect their bankruptcy estates; and provide
other legal services related to the cases.

McLaughlin's current hourly rates range from $475 to $550 for
partners and from $125 to $150 for paralegals.  The firm received a
non-refundable retainer of $150,000 from the Debtors.

Steven Newburgh, Esq., a partner at McLaughlin, disclosed in a
court filing that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases, Mr.
Newburgh disclosed that his firm has not agreed to a variation of
its standard billing arrangements for its employment with the
Debtors, and that no McLaughlin professional has varied his rate
based on the geographic location of the Debtors' cases.

Mr. Newburgh also disclosed that McLaughlin represented the Debtors
during the 12 months before the petition date using these hourly
rates:

     Partners              $575
     Associates     $260 - $325  

The Debtors have already approved the firm's budget and staffing
plan for the period February 14 to May 18, 2019, according to Mr.
Newburgh.

McLaughlin can be reached through:

     Steven S. Newburgh, Esq.
     McLaughlin & Stern PLLC
     CityPlace Office Tower, Suite 1700
     West Palm Beach, FL 33401
     Tel: (561) 659-4020
     Email: snewburgh@mclaughlinstern.com

                About 1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC
                           and BBPC LLC

With its headquarters in Brooklyn, New York, BBPC LLC, doing
business as Great Eastern Energy, provides energy commodities to
retail customers.  BBPC began serving natural gas customers in New
York, New Jersey and Massachusetts in 2000, and later expanded to
serve electricity customers in New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts,
and Connecticut in 2013.  1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC owns 100%
of the equity in BBPC.

1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC and BBPC LLC sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 19-10303 and 19-10304) on Feb.
14, 2019.  The Debtors estimated $50 million to $100 million in
assets and the same range of liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Hon. Kevin J. Carey is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped McLaughlin & Stern, PLLC as bankruptcy counsel;
Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP as Delaware counsel;
Glassratner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC as financial advisor; and
Omni Management Group, Inc., as claims, noticing, and
administrative agent.


792 RESTAURANT: Unsecured Creditors to Get 3.5% Under Ch. 11 Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
792 Restaurant Food Corp. filed a small business Chapter 11 plan
and accompanying disclosure statement.

The Debtor operates a restaurant under the name "lilli and loo"
located at 792 Lexington
Avenue, New York, New York. The restaurant serves Asian cuisine and
sushi and has both
dine-in and delivery services.

Class 2 - All general unsecured claims are impaired. These claims
will be paid a distribution from a plan fund of $60,000.00, after
all administrative and priority claims have been paid in full. The
Debtor estimates that approximately $30,000.00 will be available
for unsecured creditors and that unsecured creditors will receive a
distribution of 3.5% of their claim.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by a
$60,000.00 contribution by the Debtor's principal, Siew Moy Low, to
be paid from her personal funds. The plan fund shall be deposited
in escrow with Debtor's counsel, Morrison Tenenbaum PLLC, prior to
the effective date of the Plan. Morrison Tenenbaum PLLC shall serve
as the disbursing agent under the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 20, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y32zend8from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

792 Restaurant Food Corp filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-13512) on November 13, 2018, and is
represented by Lawrence Morrison, Esq., at Morrison Tenenbaum,
PLLC.


ADVANCED PATIENT: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------
Advanced Patient Advocacy, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland to use cash
collateral to pay the monthly operating expenses as set forth in
the budget.

During the case, the Debtor requires the use of Cash Collateral to
meet its ordinary and necessary expenses, including but not limited
to payroll, insurance, utilities, taxes, licenses, and vendors so
that it may maintain and preserve the value of its assets for the
benefit of its estate and creditors.

The Debtor's principal secured creditor is The Columbia Bank.
Sometime in July 2015, Columbia Bank made two loans to the Debtor.
Columbia Bank asserts a lien on all of the Debtor's assets,
including cash collateral, as defined in section 363(a) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The Debtor has never been in a payment default under the Columbia
Bank loan documents. However, as a result of the Debtor's
accounting of its accounts receivable that serve as collateral to
Columbia Bank, the bank has asserted that the Debtor is in default
under the terms of the loan and has accelerated the loan balance in
advance of maturity. As such, Columbia Bank has placed a hold on
the Debtor's bank accounts ending in xxxxxx1667 and xxxxxx4754.

The Debtor asserts that Columbia Bank is an undersecured creditor.
As adequate protection for Columbia Bank, the Debtor (a) will file
its monthly operating reports in a timely manner setting forth its
income, expenditures and use of cash collateral in compliance with
the Budgets; (b) will keep its assets in good working order,
maintenance and repair, and (c) requests that the Court grant
Columbia Bank replacement liens on the same assets on which it held
prepetition liens and all products and proceeds thereof in the
Interim Period.

In addition, the Debtor seeks to have Columbia Bank release its
hold on accounts ending in xxxxxx1667 and xxxxxx4754 so that it can
utilize the money in those accounts according to the Budgets.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb19-12774-6.pdf

                  About Advanced Patient Advocacy

Founded in 2000, Advanced Patient Advocacy --
https://www.aparesults.com/ -- offers an integrated portfolio of
services that solves complex uncompensated care challenges.  The
Company provides comprehensive enrollment and eligibility services
improving alignment of coverage options to patient needs;
multidisciplinary service delivery to recover motor vehicle
accident, workers' compensation, and other third-party liability
claims; and specialized advocacy services to help patients qualify
for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or Social Security
Disability Income (SSDI) benefits; workflow alignment for A/R
system conversions, small-balance follow-up, In-State and
Out-of-State Medicaid, and Veterans Administration accounts
receivables.
                   
Advanced Patient Advocacy, LLC, d/b/a A.P.A., LLC, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. Case No. 19-12774) on March 4, 2019.  In the
petition signed by CEO Kevin A. Groner, the Debtor estimated $1
million to $10 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities. Lawrence Joseph Yumkas, Esq., at Yumkas, Vidmar,
Sweeney & Mulrenin, LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


ALEXANDER SEAWRIGHT: Emergency Bid for Imposition of Stay Tossed
----------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Neil P. Olack entered an order denying Alexander
Seawright Transportation, LLC's Emergency Motion for Imposition of
the Automatic Stay, for Damages, Sanctions and for Contempt.

The Debtor is a trucking company. Southern Insurance Specialist,
Corp. serves as an insurance agent for trucking companies. Acting
as the Debtor's insurance agent, Southern negotiated for and
obtained physical damage insurance coverage through Lloyd's of
London and cargo insurance coverage through Aspen. First Light
Program Managers, Inc. operates as a coverholder for Lloyd's; it
bound the Physical Damage Insurance Policy, and it has the
authority, inter alia, to collect premiums and to issue a notice of
cancellation when the insured fails to make a payment. Premco
Financial Corporation, Inc., an insurance premium finance company,
provided financing for the Debtor’s premium payments on the 2019
Policies. In accordance with the Financing Agreement, Premco
advanced money to Southern to be held in trust until the premium
payments on the 2019 Policies become due and are forwarded to
Lloyd’s and Aspen.

The main issue at the Hearing was whether the Physical Damage
Insurance Agreement constitutes a prepetition, executory contract
and, thus, is subject to the protections of the automatic stay
under 11 U.S.C. section 362. At the Hearing, the Debtor argued that
it obtained the Physical Damage Insurance Agreement prepetition,
and Premco, Southern, and First Light argued that the Debtor
obtained the Physical Damage Insurance Agreement post-petition and
without permission from this Court as required by Rule 4001(c).

After fully considering the matter, the Court found at the Hearing
that the Emergency Motion should be denied. The Physical Damage
Insurance Agreement provides that the period of insurance begins on
January 18, 2019, and ends on Jan. 18, 2020, at "12:01 a.m. Local
Standard Time at the address of the Assured shown above." While
Peter F. Keyes, owner of Southern, testified that the 2019 Policies
became effective at 12:01 a.m. on Jan. 18, 2019, Keyes also
testified that claims are covered only after policies are bound,
and the Physical Damage Insurance Policy was bound post-petition.
The issue of whether a claim is covered under the 2019 Policies,
however, is not before this Court. At best, the Court finds that
the coverage period is ambiguous.

The record also reflects undeniably that Seawright, on behalf of
the Debtor, signed the Financing Agreement post-petition and
obtained financing for the 2019 Policies after failing to disclose
the Debtor's financial condition and financial status. As discussed
earlier, the Financing Agreement required the Debtor to confirm
"that there are no pending or anticipated bankruptcy, receivership
or insolvency proceedings involving the insured, and there are no
known or anticipated circumstances which will impair INSURED
ability to fulfill its obligations under this contract." Despite
this condition, Seawright signed the Financing Agreement with the
understanding that the Debtor had filed the Petition approximately
four hours beforehand. The Debtor's distressed financial condition
at the time of signing is further evidenced by the fact that the
Debtor never made a payment under the Financing Agreement.

While the Court can weigh the evidence presented at the Hearing and
analyze whether the Debtor obtained the Physical Damage Insurance
Policy prepetition or post-petition, this Court refuses to assist
the Debtor with its obvious omission of facts to Premco, Southern,
and First Light. Seawright is a licensed practicing attorney and a
shareholder in a large law firm. The Court finds that Seawright, as
an attorney, should be more familiar than other debtors with legal
documents and the consequences of failing to disclose material
facts to an insurance company and its affiliates. Debtor's
operations manager Timothy Savell and Seawright secured insurance
coverage vital to the Debtor's business fully knowing that the
Debtor would be filing soon or, in fact, already had filed the
Petition. Nothing in the record suggests that Savell, Seawright, or
anyone else on behalf of the Debtor disclosed to Premco, Southern,
or First Light that the Debtor intended to file the Petition less
than one hour after the Prepetition Meeting or that it had filed
the Petition before signing the Financing Agreement, the Payment
Agreement, and the Insurance Proposal.

Even if the Physical Damage Insurance Agreement is a prepetition
agreement, the Court will not grant the Emergency Motion and
enforce the automatic stay to ensure that the Debtor's scheme
succeeds. Since the Emergency Motion requests this Court to
validate the 2019 Policies that the Debtor obtained by deception,
this Court finds that the Debtor filed the Emergency Motion in bad
faith. As a result, the Cancellation Notice is valid and does not
violate the automatic stay. To the extent required, the Court finds
that the automatic stay should be annulled retroactive to Feb. 15,
2019, the date of the Cancellation Notice.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated March 18,
2019 is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/mssb1900217-150.pdf

         About Alexander Seawright Transportation

Alexander Seawright Transportation, LLC provides transportation and
shipping services across the United States.  Its fleet of trucks
specializes in hauling refrigerated freight and produce.

Alexander Seawright Transportation sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Miss. Case No. 19-00217) on
January 18, 2019. In the petition signed by Jon Seawright, manager,
the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.

The case has been assigned to Judge Neil P. Olack.

The Debtor tapped the Law Offices of Craig M. Geno, PLLC as its
bankruptcy counsel.


ALFRED DESSELLE: Wants to Enter into Compromise Deal on Succession
------------------------------------------------------------------
Alfred James Desselle and Marsha B. Desselle ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana to authorize
them to (i) enter into the Compromise Agreement reached in the
matter of the Succession of Jacob Bordelon; and (i) transfer the
property contemplated under said Agreement.

Joint Debtor, Marsha B. Desselle, is an heir to the Succession,
Probate No. 2012-902762 "B" on the docket of the 12th Judicial
District Court, Parish of Avoyelles, State of Louisiana.  The
Succession was filed in 2012 and has been a contested matter for
several years.

The parties have now reached a global settlement which requires the
transfer and/or partition of the succession property as set forth
in the Compromise Agreement.

The proof of claim filed by Union Bank reflects that the bank
obtained at least two judgments against the Debtor in the matters
of The Union Bank vs. Alfred J. Desselle, Civil Docket No.
201-4560-B and Civil Docket No.2017-4609-B.  Additionally, the
Union Bank caused the joint Debtors undivided interest in the
Succession to be seized pre-petition.

The Debtors believe that the settlement is fair and that it is in
the best interest of the bankruptcy estate to settle the claim as
requested.  They ask that the settlement be approved and that they
be authorized to enter into the transfers of property contemplated
under the Compromise Agreement free and clear of the claims and
interests of The Union Bank and further recognizing the Union
Bank's lien on the property to be received under the Compromise
Agreement to the extent it has already attached under state law.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Alfred_Desselle_24_Sales.pdf

Counsel for Debtors:

          L. Laramie Henry, Esq.
          P.O. Box 8536
          Alexandria, LA 71306
          Telephone: (318) 445-6000

Alfred James Desselle and Marsha B. Desselle sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 19-80026) on Jan. 15, 2019.
The Debtors tapped Laramie Henry, Esq., as counsel.



AMERICAN GREEN: Sets Bidding Procedures for All Assets
------------------------------------------------------
William R. Greendyke, the Chapter 11 Trustee of American Green
Technology, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas to authorize the bidding procedures in connection
with the sale of substantially all assets via auction.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor was no longer operating due to
constrained cash-flow.  Its pre-petition indebtedness includes
loans in the aggregate amount of approximately $4.5 million
provided by Ushio America and $70,000 provided by Moriah Infection
Solutions, Inc.  Ushio and Moriah assert that they have valid,
perfected liens on all of the Debtor's assets.  In addition,
Airguide MFG, MS LLC the lessor of industrial space in Clarksdale,
Mississippi, has asserted a lien on inventory located on the
Clarksdale premises.

Immediately upon his appointment, the Trustee began conferring with
the U.S. Trustee and the Debtor's significant stakeholders
regarding the Debtor's assets and the best path forward in the
case.  On Jan. 23, 2019, the Trustee retained Claro Group, LLC as
his financial advisor and consultant to, among other things, run a
process for the sale of substantially all of the Debtor's assets.

As of the date of the Motion, non-disclosure agreements and teasers
have been distributed to potentially interested parties and Claro
has begun communications regarding a potential sale transaction.  


The Trustee respectfully asks entry of the Bidding Procedures
Order: (i) authorizing and approving certain procedures for the
sale of substantially all of the Debtor's assets, including the
assumption and assignment of the Contracts; (ii) authorizing the
Trustee to select of one or more stalking horse bidders, if any,
and the provision of Bid Protections; (iii) scheduling an auction
in connection with the proposed sale of the Assets; (iv) scheduling
dates and deadlines in connection with a hearing to approve the
Sale of the Assets; (v) approving the form and manner of notice of
the Bidding Procedures, the Auction, and the Sale Hearing; and (vi)
granting any related relief.    

The Bidding Procedures will provide a clear and timely path forward
that will allow the Trustee to expeditiously solicit, receive, and
evaluate bids in a fair and accessible manner and encourage bidders
to put their best bids forward for the benefit of all
stakeholders.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: April 2, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. (CST)

     b. Initial Bid: Each Bid must clearly set forth the purchase
price in U.S. dollars, and allocate the Purchase Price between each
category of Assets subject to the Qualified Bid, including
inventory, patents, and other intellectual property.

     c. Deposit: 10% of the aggregate cash and non-cash Purchase
Price of the Bid, to be held in an interest-bearing escrow account
to be identified and established by the Trustee

     d. Auction:  The Auction will take place at 10:00 a.m. (CST)
on April 4, 2019 at the offices of Norton Rose Fulbright US, LLP,
1301 McKinney Street, Suite 5100, Houston, Texas 77010.  

     e. Bid Increments: $100,000

     f. Sale Hearing: April 12, 2019 (or such other date available
to the Court)

     g. Sale/Cure Objection Deadline: April 9, 2019

     h. Notice of Successful Bid: April 5, 2019

     i. Any party with a valid lien on property of the Debtor that
submits a Qualified Bid can include a credit bid with respect to
property on which it has a valid lien and to the extent consistent
with Bankruptcy Code section 363(k).

The other proposed dates and deadlines in connection with the
Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Deadline for the Trustee to Select Stalking Horse Bidder
(if any): March 18, 2019

     b. Deadline for the Trustee to File a Stalking Horse Purchase
Agreement or Form Purchase Agreement: March 19, 2019

     c. Deadline for Trustee to File Notice of Contracts or Leases
Subject to Assumption and Proposed Cure Amounts: April 2, 2019

By the Motion, the Trustee also asks that the Court approves the
sale of the Assets to the Successful Bidder free and clear of all
liens, claims, and encumbrances.  He asks approval of his
assumption and assignment of certain unexpired executory contracts
and leases that may be identified by the Successful Bidder selected
at the Auction to the Successful Bidder under Bankruptcy Code
section 365.  He further asks that such relief be considered and
granted at the Sale Hearing, pursuant to a proposed Sale Order that
will be filed in advance of the Sale Hearing.  The Trustee reserves
the right to seek approval of the Sale through a chapter 11 plan.  


Expedited consideration is necessary to provide stability and
certainty to the sale process, and to ensure that the Trustee can
complete the sale process in a cost-effective and efficient
fashion.

A hearing on the Motion is set for March 14, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.

A copy of the Bidding Procedures attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/American_Green_76_Sales.pdf

                About American Green Technology

American Green Technology Inc., also known as American Green
Technology TM, is a manufacturer of lighting products for the heavy
industry and healthcare sector.  It is headquartered in South Bend,
Indiana.

On Aug. 28, 2018, AirGuide Mfg. MS, LLC, Lai Family Investments,
Inc., and Dave Peterson, as petitioning creditors, filed an
involuntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No.
18-34728) against the Debtor.  The petitioning creditors are
represented by Deirdre Carey Brown, Esq., an attorney based in
Houston, Texas.

On Dec. 20, 2019, the court approved the appointment of William R.
Greendyke as Chapter 11 trustee.  The Trustee tapped Norton Rose
Fulbright U.S. LLP as his legal counsel, and Claro Group, LLC, as
financial advisor.


ATLAS FINANCIAL: A.M. Best Lowers Financial Strength Rating to C+
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AM Best has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating (Long-Term
ICR) of "c" of Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc. (Atlas) [NASDAQ:
AFH], and the Financial Strength Rating (FSR) of C (Weak) and the
Long-Term ICRs of "ccc" of American Service Insurance Company Inc.
(Schaumburg, IL), American Country Insurance Company (Schaumburg,
IL) and Gateway Insurance Company (St. Louis, MO), collectively
referred to as the American Service Pool. AM Best also has
downgraded the FSR to C+ (Marginal) from C++ (Marginal) and the
Long-Term ICR to "b-" from "b" of Global Liberty Insurance Company
of New York (Global Liberty) (Melville, NY), another wholly owned
subsidiary of Atlas. The outlook of these Credit Ratings (ratings)
is negative. Concurrently AM Best has withdrawn these ratings as
the companies have requested to no longer participate in AM Best's
interactive rating process.

The ratings of the American Service Pool reflect its balance sheet
strength, which AM Best categorizes as very weak, as well as its
marginal operating performance, neutral business profile and
marginal enterprise risk management (ERM).

The rating downgrades of Global Liberty take into consideration the
significant reserve strengthening charge taken in the fourth
quarter of 2018, which has resulted in a material contraction in
surplus and deterioration in risk-adjusted capitalization.

The ratings of Global Liberty reflect its balance sheet strength,
which AM Best categorizes as weak, as well as its marginal
operating performance, limited business profile and marginal ERM.


AUM SHRI GANESHAY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Seven affiliates that have filed voluntary petitions seeking relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                     Case No.
     ------                                     --------
     Aum Shri Ganeshay Manah LLC                19-54787
        DBA Baymont Inn Covington
     2008 Eastview Parkway, Suite 150
     Conyers, GA 30013-5717

     Covington Lodging Inc.                     19-54789
        DBA Americas Best Value Inn
     2008 Eastview Parkway, Suite 150
     Conyers, GA 30013-5717

     Janam Madison Lodging LLC                  19-54790
        DBA Red Roof Inn & Suites
     2008 Eastview Parkway, Suite 150
     Conyers, GA 30013-5717

     Janam Taccoa Lodging LLC                   19-54792
        DBA The Quality Inn Toccoa
     2008 Eastview Parkway, Suite 150
     Conyers, GA 30013

     Ohm Conyers Lodging LLC                    19-54795
        DBA Hawthorne Suites Covington
     2008 Eastview Parkway, Suite 150
     Conyers, GA 30013-5717

     Sanam Athens Lodging Inc                   19-54796
        DBA Microtel Inn Athens
     2008 Eastview Parkway, Suite 150
     Conyers, GA 30013-5717

     Sanam Conyers Lodging LLC                  19-54798
       DBA Microtel Inn & Suites Conyers
     2008 Eastview Parkway, Suite 150
     Conyers, GA 30013-5717

Business Description: The Debtors listed their businesses as
                      Single Asset Real Estate (as defined in 11
                      U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 26, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta)

Debtors' Counsel: Edward F. Danowitz, Esq.
                  DANOWITZ LEGAL, P.C.
                  300 Galleria Parkway, SE, Suite 960
                  Atlanta, GA 30339-5949
                  Tel: (770) 933-0960
                  Fax: (770) 955-6654
                  Email: edanowitz@danowitzlegal.com

                                Estimated       Estimated
                                  Assets       Liabilities
                              -------------  ------------------
Aum Shri Ganeshay Manah       $0 to $50,000  $1-mil. to $10-mil.
Covington Lodging Inc.        $0 to $50,000  $0 to $50,000
Janam Madison Lodging         $0 to $50,000  $500,000 to $1-mil.
Janam Taccoa Lodging LLC      $0 to $50,000  $100,000 to $500,000
Ohm Conyers Lodging LLC       $0 to $50,000  $500,000 to $1-mil.
Sanam Athens Lodging Inc      $0 to $50,000  $100,000 to $500,000
Sanam Conyers Lodging LLC     $0 to $50,000  $0 to $50,000

The petitions were signed by Wesley Dowdy, manager, 2019 Hotel
Company, LLC.

The full-text copies of the petitions are available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54787.pdf
          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54789.pdf
          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54790.pdf
          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54792.pdf
          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54795.pdf
          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54796.pdf
          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54798.pdf

Copies of the Debtors' lists of 20 largest unsecured creditors are
available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54787_creditors.pdf
      http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54789_creditors.pdf
      http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54790_creditors.pdf
      http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54792_creditors.pdf
      http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54795_creditors.pdf
      http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54796_creditors.pdf
      http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54798_creditors.pdf


AVON PRODUCTS: S&P Puts 'B' ICR on CreditWatch Positive
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all of its ratings on Avon Products Inc.,
including its 'B' issuer credit rating, on CreditWatch with
positive implications.

The CreditWatch placement follows Avon's disclosure that it is in
preliminary discussions with Natura Cosmeticos S.A. (BB/CW Neg/--)
regarding a potential transaction. Neither company disclosed any
additional details about the timing of the transaction or the
potential financing strategy. If the transaction closes, Avon could
benefit from being a part of a financially stronger group.   

"We expect to resolve the CreditWatch placement when the
transaction closes and we analyze the combined companies
strategies, capital structure, and financial policy. Key factors
that we will consider include Natura's credit profile after the
transaction and our view of Avon's position in the group, including
to what extent the group might support it should it encounter
difficulties," S&P said.

Alternatively, if the transaction is not completed, S&P would
reassess its ratings on Avon, which would most likely result in
affirmation and removal of the ratings from CreditWatch.


BAUSERMAN SERVICE: Court Confirms Chapter 11 Plan
-------------------------------------------------
The Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Chapter 11 Plan, as modified,
filed by Bauserman Service, Inc., and approved the accompanying
disclosure statement on a final basis.

The Plan is modified as follows:

   (i) Section 2.03 of Article II of the Plan shall be deleted in
its entirety and replaced with the following:

       2.03 U.S. Trustee's Fees. All fees payable pursuant to 28
U.S.C. Section 1930 shall be paid on the Effective Date. All fees
payable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1930 after the Effective Date
shall be paid on a quarterly basis until the Chapter 11 Case is
closed, converted, or dismissed. The Reorganized Debtor is liable
for the payment of all quarterly fees due pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Section 1930. The Reorganized Debtor shall file with the Bankruptcy
Court and provide the United States Trustee with post-confirmation
quarterly reports that shall include all disbursements for that
quarter.

  (ii) Section 4.05 of Article IV of the Plan shall be deleted in
its entirety and replaced with the following:

       4.05 Treatment of Class 5 (General Unsecured Claims,
$272,068.18). Class 5 consists of the General Unsecured Claims as
compromised by agreement and/or filed by (i) Donnie Spiers
($106,000.00); (ii) Hooper & Associates ($57,000.00); (iii) Law
Offices of Sue A. Greer ($100,000.00); (iv) Mudd, Mudd & Fitzgerald
($2,310.00); and (v) PNC Bank, N.A. ($6,758.18). In full and final
satisfaction and discharge of each Allowed Class 5 Claim, each
Holder of an Allowed Class 5 Claim shall receive their pro-rata
share of the balance of the proceeds from the sale of the Assets
after all Allowed Claims in Classes 1-4 are paid and/or satisfied.
Based on a voluntary reduction in the amount of certain Holders of
Class 5 Claims, the Class 5 Claims are expected to receive 100% of
the amount of their Allowed Claims over eighteen months beginning
on the Effective Date, with interest at the rate of 3% per annum.
The Debtor or Reorganized Debtor (as the case may be) reserves the
right to object to these Claims and nothing herein shall constitute
an admission that these Claims are Allowed. Class 5 is Impaired,
and is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.

(iii) Section 4.06 of Article IV of the Plan shall be deleted in
its entirety and replaced with the following:

       4.06 Treatment of Class 6 (Equity Interests). Class 6
consists of Equity Interests in the Debtor. As of the Petition
Date, the stock interest in the Debtor was owned 100% by the
Bauserman Estate. The Holder of the Class 6 Equity Interests in the
Debtor shall receive any surplus funds after payment in full
(including interest) to holders of Allowed Claims under the Plan.
Following Closing on the sale of the Airport Properties and the
distribution of all payments under the Plan, the Equity Interests
will be deemed cancelled and extinguished, without any further act
or action under any applicable law, regulation, order or rule.
Class 6 is Impaired, but is not entitled to vote in favor of or
against the Plan.

  (iv) Paragraph 14 of Article V of the Plan shall be deleted in
its entirety and replaced with the following:

       14. Approval of the FAA and MAA: Consent from the FAA and
MAA shall be obtained prior to the sale of the Airport Properties.
PSM Holdings shall continue to operate the airport after Closing,
subject to FAA and MAA approval.

  (v) Section 8.10 of Article VIII of the Plan (Exculpation) shall
be deleted in its entirety. 8.10 Exculpation. [Deleted]

      The Debtor is authorized and directed to transfer the Assets
to PSM Holdings, LLC, or its assigns (the "Purchaser"), on the
Closing Date in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
Plan and the Settlement Agreement, and the Purchaser is directed to
pay the Purchase Price to the Debtor and the Bauserman Estate.

The Airport Properties shall be transferred to the Purchaser.

Assigned Contracts  shall be deemed assumed and assigned to the
Purchaser as of the Closing Date.

Charles County and the Purchaser shall split the state recordation
tax and county transfer tax equally.

A full-text copy of the Plan Confirmation Order dated March 25,
2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y6bgozpd from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                  About Bauserman Service

Founded in 1945, Bauserman Service Inc. owns and operates the
Maryland Airport, a general aviation airport in western Charles
County, located four miles east of the Town of Indian Head,
Maryland.

Bauserman Service sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-24054) on Oct. 23, 2018.
In the petition signed by Tammy Potter, president, the Debtor
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  Judge Thomas J. Catliota presides over the
case.  The Debtor tapped McNamee Hosea Jernigan Kim Greenan &
Lynch, P.A. as its legal counsel and The Law Offices of Sue A.
Greer, P.C., as special counsel.


BIG COOP'S: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral Until March 25
---------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Daniel S. Opperman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Michigan authorized Big Coop's Trucking, LLC to
use cash collateral on an interim basis for the period through
March 25, 2019.

The Debtor proposes that it be allowed the use of the maximum
specified dollar amount of $160,000 per month on an interim basis
until a final hearing is commenced by the Court, or until
negotiated with the secured creditor or until further Order of the
Court.

The Debtor is indebted to Newtek Small Business Finance for
principal, interest and other charges, in the above-referenced case
in the amount of $366,860 (as of Jan. 29, 2019). Newtek asserts a
secured lien against all assets of the Debtor.

Newtek Small Business Finance will receive adequate protection
payments for the Debtor's continued use of cash collateral as
follows:

      (1) The Debtor will keep all of Newtek's collateral fully
insured.

      (2) The Debtor will deposit all cash acquired post-petition
into the DIP account.

      (3) The Debtor believes Newtek to be fully secured by virtue
of its lien on the Debtor's assets and thus is provided adequate
protection by virtue of its equity cushion.

      (4) The Debtor will make payments to Newtek during the
pendency of the Debtor's Chapter 11 proceeding pursuant to the
agreement of the parties contained in their Sept. 1, 2017
agreement. The current payment amount is $4,907, subject to
increase in interest rate as contained in the agreement.

A copy of the Order is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb19-30180-32.pdf

                         About Big Coop's

Big Coop's Trucking is a licensed and bonded freight shipping and
trucking company running freight hauling business from Swartz
Creek, Michigan.

Big Coop's filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No.
19-30180) on Jan. 25, 2019.  The petition was signed by Adam
Cooper, member.  The Hon. Daniel S. Opperman Flint is assigned to
the case.  The Debtor is represented by David W. Brown, Esq. at the
Law Office of David W. Brown PLLC.  At the time of filing, the
Debtor estimated $50,000 to $100,000 in assets and $1 million to
$10 million in liabilities.



BROOALEXA LLC: Case Summary & 8 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------
Debtor: BrooAlexa, LLC
        5057 Big Tyler Rd
        Charleston, WV 25313

Business Description: BrooAlexa, LLC is a multi-faceted
                      construction company in Charleston,
                      West Virginia.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 27, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of West Virginia (Charleston)

Case No.: 19-20128

Debtor's Counsel: Andrew S. Nason, Esq.
                  PEPPER & NASON
                  8 Hale Street
                  Charleston, WV 25301
                  Tel: (304) 346-0361
                  Fax: (304) 346-1054
                  E-mail: andyn@peppernason.com
                          tinas@peppernason.com

Total Assets: $25,352

Total Liabilities: $1,557,712

The petition was signed by Gene Brooks, manager/president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's eight unsecured creditors is available for
free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/wvsb19-20128.pdf


BUCK SPRINGS: R. Garrison Seeks Rejection of Plan and Disclosures
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Robert D. Garrison filed an objection to the confirmation and final
approval of Buck Springs, Inc. and Alma Aline Shellhammer's
combined disclosure statement and plan of reorganization.

Garrison complains that Plan does not comply with the required
provisions of title 11 of the United States Code, including 11
U.S.C. section 1129; therefore, it may not be confirmed.

The Plan fails to provide the same treatment for all unsecured
creditors of Shellhammer. Instead, it simply states that all of
Shellhammer's unsecured claims will be paid in full through Buck
Springs "with the exception Robert Garrison." In doing so, Debtors
propose paying all unsecured claims except Robert Garrison's in
full out of Buck Springs’s assets, while paying Robert Garrison
less than two percent of his claim out of Shellhammer's assets.

The Plan further fails to disclose Debtors' proposed treatment of
equity interests in Buck Springs, including who will own or retain
any equity interest and whether Alma Shellhammer, or any other
related person or insider, will exercise any managerial authority
in Buck Springs.

The Plan further fails to protect the rights of general unsecured
creditors in the event Debtors default under the Plan.
Specifically, the Plan does not contain an address at which to
notify Debtors of any default, nor does it specify the method for
any such notification. Additionally, the Plan does not allow
general unsecured creditors to exercise any and all rights and
remedies available under applicable bankruptcy or non-bankruptcy
law to collect their claims against Debtors in the event of default
under the Plan.

The Debtors' Disclosure Statement also does not contain adequate
information to allow creditors to make an informed choice regarding
the Plan. Specifically, it lacks adequate information regarding:

   A. Outstanding accounts receivable, whether they are
collectible, and Debtors' efforts, if any, to collect them;

   B. How Debtors intend to increase sales by 15% per year;

   C. Clark Shofner's services, if any, and whether he has or will
receive compensation for said services;

   D. The characterization, possible repayment, and treatment of
money contributed by Clark Shofner to Buck Springs;

   E. The proposed future management structure of Buck Springs,
including whether it will be owned and operated by Clark Shofner or
Alma Shellhammer;

   F. The specific services, if any, to be rendered by Alma
Shellhammer, and whether she will receive any compensation from
Buck Springs for said services;

   G. The amount of administrative expenses owed and to be paid by
each Debtor;

   H. The specific number and value of the claims in each class
owed by Debtors;

   I. How Debtors determined that liquidation under Chapter 7 would
be less beneficial to creditors; and

   J. Shellhammer's proposed treatment, if any, of its unsecured
creditors' claims, other than Robert Garrison's, in the event Buck
Springs defaults on its payment of those claims.

A copy of Garrison's Objection is available at
http://tinyurl.com/y693eaepfrom Pacermonitor.com at no charge.  

The Troubled Company Reported previously reported that the general
unsecured claim of Robert D. Garrison will be paid in installment
for a period of 5 years with a monthly payment of $750.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated January 14,
2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y8mg3x97 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for Robert D. Garrison:

     John B. Thomas
     State Bar No. 19856150
     jthomas@hicks-thomas.com
     Abbie G. Sprague
     State Bar No. 24074244
     asprague@hicks-thomas.com
     700 Louisiana, Suite 2000
     Houston, Texas 77002
     Telephone: (713) 547-9100
     Fax: (713) 547-9150
 
                     About Buck Springs

Buck Springs, Inc. is a grocery company located in Jasper, Texas.
Buck Springs sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 18-10059) on Feb. 21 2018.  In its
petition signed by Robert Lee Shellhammer, president, the Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge Bill
Parker presides over the case.  Maida Clark Law Firm, P.C., is the
Debtor's legal counsel.


BUILTRITE BUILDERS: Taps Wadsworth Warner as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Builtrite Builders, LLC, received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Colorado to hire Wadsworth Warner
Conrardy, P.C., as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code, represent the Debtor in any litigation, and
provide other legal services in connection with its Chapter 11
case.

The firm will be paid at these hourly rates:

     David Wadsworth     $425
     David Warner        $325
     Aaron Conrardy      $300
     Lacey Bryan         $225
     Paralegals          $115

Wadsworth received a retainer in the amount of $54,957 from the
Debtor.  

The firm is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     David V. Wadsworth, Esq.
     Wadsworth Warner Conrardy, P.C.
     2580 W. Main St., Suite 200
     Littleton, CO 80120
     Phone: (303) 296-1999
     Fax: (303) 296-7600
     Email: dwarner@wwc-legal.com

                   About Builtrite Builders

Builtrite Builders, LLC, d/b/a Copperleaf Homes and d/b/a
Copperleaf Custom Homes, based in Colorado Springs, CO, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 19-10938) on Feb. 11,
2019.  In the petition signed by Steve Neary, president, the Debtor
estimated $500,000 to $1 million in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  The Hon. Joseph G. Rosania Jr. oversees
the case.  Wadsworth Warner Conrardy, P.C. is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


CERIDIAN HCM: Moody's Hikes CFR & Secured Credit Facilities to B2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded Ceridian HCM Holding Inc.'s
Corporate Family Rating to B2 from B3 and Probability of Default
Rating to B2-PD from B3-PD. Moody's also upgraded the ratings on
the company's senior secured credit facilities to B2 from B3 and
affirmed the Speculative Grade Liquidity rating of SGL-2. The
rating upgrades were driven by ongoing improvement in Ceridian's
financial performance and credit protection metrics during the past
year. Ceridian's free cash flow turned positive in the second half
of 2018, building upon the interest savings from the senior note
repayment from proceeds of the 2018 initial public offering, and
Moody's expects earnings growth to continue to reduce leverage and
increase free cash flow over the next two years. The outlook was
revised from positive to stable.

Moody's took the following rating actions on Ceridian HCM Holding
Inc.:

Ratings upgraded:

Corporate Family Rating, Upgraded to B2 from B3

Probability of Default Rating, Upgraded to B2-PD from B3-PD

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility expiring 2023 -- Upgraded
to B2 (LGD3) from B3 (LGD3)

Senior Secured Term Loan due 2025 -- Upgraded to B2 (LGD3) from B3
(LGD3)

Ratings affirmed:

Speculative Grade Liquidity rating SGL-2

Outlook Action:

Outlook revised to Stable from Positive

RATINGS RATIONALE

Ceridian's B2 CFR is principally constrained by the company's high,
though improving, debt/EBITDA leverage (Moody's adjusted) of above
6x as well as the competitive nature of the U.S. payroll processing
and human capital management ("HCM") sector in which Ceridian faces
larger rivals with greater financial resources. The rating is also
negatively impacted by the company's exposure to economic
cyclicality as periods of high unemployment and low interest rates
tend to negatively affect Ceridian's financial results due to
declines in both payroll processing volume and float revenue earned
on customer payroll funds temporarily held in trust. The rating is
supported by Ceridian's improving business visibility as its
revenues are increasingly driven by cloud-based products and
related services featuring long term contracts and high retention
rates. Additionally, the company's successful migration of a
sizable majority of its customer base from its legacy Bureau-based
products to cloud offerings should positively impact Ceridian's
profitability and free cash flow generation.

Moody's believes Ceridian's liquidity will be good over the next
year, as indicated by the SGL-2 rating. Liquidity is supported by
the company's cash balance of $217.8 million as of December 31,
2018 and Moody's expectation of free cash flow in excess of $60
million in 2019. The company's liquidity is also bolstered by an
undrawn $300 million revolving credit facility (availability
reduced by $2.7 million in outstanding letters of credit). The cash
sources provide strong coverage of the $6.8 million of required
term loan amortization in 2019. While Ceridian's term loan is not
subject to financial covenants, the revolving credit facility has a
springing covenant based on a maximum consolidated first lien debt
to EBITDA ratio which the company should be comfortably in
compliance with over the next 12-18 months.

The stable ratings outlook reflects Moody's expectation that
Ceridian will generate high single digit organic sales growth in
the coming year as the company benefits from increased adoption of
its cloud-based payroll and HCM offerings amidst a generally
healthy macroeconomic environment. Operating leverage benefits,
coupled with a higher installed base of cloud customers, should
fuel healthy EBITDA growth during this period with debt leverage
declining to the low 5x level (6x including expensed capitalized
software) by the end of 2019.

The ratings could be upgraded if Ceridian expands revenues and
EBITDA such that debt/EBITDA metrics are sustained at less than
4.5x (5.5x including expensed capitalized software) with free cash
flow to debt approaching 10% and the company adheres to
conservative financial policies.

The ratings could be downgraded if Cerdian's operating performance
weakens meaningfully from current levels or the company adopts more
aggressive financial policies such that it is unable to sustain
meaningful free cash flow generation or debt/EBITDA increases above
6.5x (7.5x including expensed capitalized software).

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

Ceridian is a publicly-traded human resources software and
transaction processing company providing workforce management
software, payroll and tax processing, and other human resources
services. Moody's expects Ceridian to generate revenues of about
$810 million over the next year.


CFO MANAGEMENT: Committee Seeks to Hire Singer & Levick as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors for CFO Management
Holdings, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Texas to hire Singer & Levick PC as its
legal counsel.

The firm will advise the committee of its rights, powers and duties
under the Bankruptcy Code; assist the committee in investigating
the financial condition of CFO and its affiliates; participate in
the formulation of a plan of reorganization; and provide other
legal services in connection with the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.

Larry Levick, Esq., and Michelle Shriro, Esq., the attorneys who
will be handling the cases, will each charge an hourly fee of $395.
Rates for other attorneys range from $250 to $325 per hour.
Paralegals charge $175 per hour.

Singer & Levick and its attorneys are "disinterested" as defined in
section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Larry A. Levick, Esq.  
     Michelle E. Shriro, Esq.
     Singer & Levick PC
     16200 Addison Road, Suite 140
     Addison, TX 75001
     Phone: 972.380.5533
     Fax: 972.380.5748
     Email: levick@singerlevick.com
     Email: mshriro@singerlevick.com

                 About CFO Management Holdings

CFO Management Holdings, LLC, through its subsidiaries, engages in
developing and selling residential and commercial real estate in
Collin County, Texas, and owns and manages a wild game ranch in
Southern Oklahoma.  The subsidiaries are Carter Family Office, LLC,
Christian  Custom Homes, LLC, Double Droptine Ranch, LLC, Frisco
Wade Crossing Partners, LLC, Kingswood Development Partners, LLC,
McKinney Executive Suites at Crescent Parc Development Partners,
LLC, North-Forty Development LLC, and West Main Station
Development, LLC.

CFO Management Holdings and its subsidiaries sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. Lead Case No. 19-40426) on
Feb. 17, 2019.  In the petition signed by CRO Lawrence Perkins, CFO
Management estimated $50 million to $100 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Annmarie Chiarello, Esq. and Joseph J. Wielebinski,
Jr., Esq., at Winstead PC, serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on March 4, 2019.


CHAPARRAL CONCRETE: Seeks to Hire Eric A. Liepins as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Chaparral Concrete Equipment LP seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas to hire Eric A.
Liepins, P.C., as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its duties under the Bankruptcy
Code and will provide other legal services in connection with its
Chapter 11 case.

The firm will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Eric Liepins, Esq.                   $275
     Paralegals/Legal Assistants     $30 - $50

Liepins received a retainer of $7,500, plus the filing fee.

The firm neither holds nor represents any interest adverse to the
interest of the Debtor and its bankruptcy estate, according to
court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
     Eric A. Liepins, P.C.
     12770 Coit Road, Suite 1100
     Dallas, TX 75251
     Telephone: (972) 991-5591
     Facsimile: (972) 991-5788
     Email: eric@ealpc.com

                About Chaparral Concrete Equipment

Chaparral Concrete Equipment, LP, is a licensed motor vehicle
dealer in Texas specializing in resale of used concrete mixer
trucks, batch plants and concrete pump trucks.

Chaparral Concrete Equipment sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 19-40690) on March
14, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets
of less than $50,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.
The case is assigned to Judge Brenda T. Rhoades.  Eric A. Liepins,
P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.



COLONIAL OAKS: B. Leitgeb Objects to Disclosure Statement
---------------------------------------------------------
Creditor Brian Leitgeb, Personal Representative for the Estate of
Irwin Leitgeb, objects to the Disclosure Statement explaining the
Chapter 11 plan of liquidation filed by Colonial Oaks Mobile Home
Park, LLC.

The Creditor complains that the Plan is nonconfirmable as it fails
to comply with Sections 506 and 507 of Title 11 because it pays the
administrative expenses from the proceeds of the sale of the
Property prior to paying the secured creditors’ claims with valid
and enforceable liens on the Property.

The Creditor further complains that the Plan is nonconfirmable as
the "Best Interests Test" is not satisfied because the impaired
secured creditors would receive less under the Plan than they would
in a hypothetical Chapter 7 liquidation.

The Creditor points out that the Disclosure Statement's description
of secured claims does not adequately disclose how and why, and on
what authority, the claims are impaired and the claims are to be
avoided.

Of Attorneys for Brian Leitgeb, PR for the Estate of Irwin
Leitgeb:

     Scott L. Jensen, Esq.
     Brownstein Rask, LLP
     1200 S.W. Main Street
     Portland, OR 97205-2040
     Telephone: (503) 221-1772
     Facsimile: (503) 221-1074
     E-mail: sjensen@brownsteinrask.com

            About Colonial Oaks Mobile Home Park

Colonial Oaks Mobile Home Park, LLC, a single asset real estate as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B), has principal assets located
at 934 Main St. Independence, Oregon.

Colonial Oaks Mobile Home Park filed a voluntary petition under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ore. Case No.
18-33183) on Sept. 12, 2018.  In the petition signed by Susan
Daniell, member, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.  The case is
assigned to the Hon. Trish M. Brown.  Nicholas J. Henderson, Esq.,
at Motschenbacher & Blattner, LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


CONEX EQUIPMENT: Unsecureds to Get Full Payment in 16 Quarters
--------------------------------------------------------------
Conex Equipment Manufacturing, LLC, C.R.P. Machine & Welding, Inc.,
and Ronald L. and Cathy L. Perdue, filed a joint Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization and accompanying disclosure statement.

Class 5. General Unsecured Claims against Conex are impaired.
Conex shall pay Allowed General Unsecured Claims against Conex in
full, without interest, over four (4) years in sixteen (16) equal
quarterly installments, beginning on the first day of the calendar
quarter that is at least 60 days after the Effective Date of the
Plan or 60 days after the entry of a Final Order that results in
the creditor's unsecured claim becoming an Allowed Claim, whichever
is later.

Class 6. General Unsecured Claims against CRP are impaired. CRP
shall pay Allowed General Unsecured Claims against CRP in full,
without interest, over four (4) years in sixteen (16) equal
quarterly installments, beginning on the first day of the calendar
quarter that is at least 60 days after the Effective Date of the
Plan or 60 days after the entry of a Final Order that results in
the creditor's unsecured claim becoming an Allowed Claim, whichever
is later.

Class 7. General Unsecured Claims against Ronald and Cathy Perdue
Ronald and Cathy Perdue shall pay Allowed General Unsecured Claims
against themselves in full, without interest, over four (4) years
in sixteen (16) equal quarterly installments, beginning on the
first day of the calendar quarter that is at least 60 days after
the Effective Date of the Plan or 60 days after the entry of a
Final Order that results in the creditor's unsecured claim becoming
an Allowed Claim, whichever is later. This Class is impaired.

Class 2. Colonial Saving, N.A.'s Secured Claim are impaired. The
Debtors will pay the principal and interest in full on the
Effective Date, or as soon thereafter as practicable, from the
proceeds of the Exit Financing provided by Exit Financing Lender.
If the requested amount of attorneys' fees is less than $3,500, or
is reduced to $3,500, the Debtors may agree to the attorneys' fees
without the need for a formal fee application. In that event, the
Debtors shall file a notice indicating that it has agreed to the
attorney fees requested and shall pay the agreed amount within 45
days of the filing of the notice. If the amount of the requested
attorneys' fees is greater than $3,500, Colonial Savings shall file
a fee application, which the Debtors may contest. The Debtors shall
pay the Allowed amount of Colonial Savings' attorneys' fees no
later than 60 days after entry of an Order allowing the amount of
such fees.

The Debtors will continue to operate their business and generate
the cash flow needed to fund the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 25, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y697239dfrom PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

            About Conex Equipment Manufacturing

Conex Equipment Manufacturing LLC, C.R.P. Machine and Welding Inc.
and their owners Ronald Lynn and Cathy Lea Perdue sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case Nos.
18-43727, 18-43729 and 18-43731) on Sept. 24, 2018.

At the time of the filing, Conex estimated assets of less than
$100,000 and liabilities of less than $100,000.  C.R.P. Machine
estimated less than $500,000 in assets and less than $1 million in
liabilities.


CORTLAND HABITATS: Visions Objects to Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------------
Visions Federal Credit Union filed a limited objection to the
Disclosure Statement explaining the filed by Cortland Habitats,
Inc., College Hill Realty, LLC, Campus Habitats, LLC, and Committed
2 Cortland, LLC.

Visions points out that the Debtors' Disclosure Statement does not
contain adequate information concerning the treatment of the
Deficiency Claim or the amount of the proposed distribution to the
Class IV general unsecured creditors. Vision further points out,
there are several inconsistencies throughout the Disclosure
Statement that make it difficult for a claimant to understand how
to vote on the Plan.

Visions objects to this inconsistent information concerning the
treatment of the general unsecured claims, as it could prevent a
holder of a general unsecured claim from making an informed
decision on the Plan.

Visions objects to the Disclosure Statement, as it incorrectly
refers to the Original Settlement Agreement and the Second Amended
Agreement is the document actually attached as Exhibit "C."
According to Vision, this statement should be revised to correctly
refer to the Second Amended Agreement, which will avoid confusion
and protect Visions' rights under the Second Amended Agreement.

Visions complains that the Debtors acknowledge that the Deficiency
Claim exists, but fail to treat the Deficiency Claim as an allowed
general unsecured claim under the Plan, and then terminate Visions'
right to recover the Deficiency Claim.

Counsel to Visions Federal Credit Union:

     Stephen A. Donato, Esq.
     BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC
     One Lincoln Center
     Syracuse, New York 13202
     Phone: 315.218.8000
     Facsimile: 315.218.8100

                    About Cortland Habitats

Cortland Habitats Inc., College Hill Realty LLC, Campus Habitats
LLC and Committed 2 Cortland LLC sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case Nos. 17-71523 to
17-71526) on March 15, 2017.  

On March 15, 2017, CEO Jeff D. Grodinsky, who holds a 100% interest
in Cortland Habitats, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
Case No. 17-71522).

The petitions were signed by Mr. Grodinsky.  The cases are assigned
to Judge Alan S. Trust.

At the time of the filing, Cortland Habitats and the three other
companies estimated their assets and liabilities at $1 million to
$10 million.


DECOR HOLDINGS: Gets Approval to Hire RAS Management, Appoint CRO
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Decor Holdings, Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to hire RAS Management
Advisors, LLC and appoint the firm's president Timothy Boates as
chief restructuring officer.

Mr. Boates and his firm will assist the company and its affiliates
in the preparation of a reorganization plan; direct the management
of all aspects of the Debtors' operations; evaluate their cash and
liquidity requirements; direct all cash management matters; and
provide other restructuring services in connection with their
Chapter 11 cases.

RAS will be paid at these rates:

                          Daily     Hourly
                          -----     ------  
     Timothy Boates      $6,000       $600    
     Timothy Puopolo     $3,500       $350    
     Robert Tetreault    $3,500       $350

Prior to the petition date, the firm received a retainer in the
amount of $250,000.

RAS is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Timothy D. Boates
     RAS Management Advisors, LLC
     599 Ocean Avenue
     Newport, RI 02840
     Phone: 401-846-5990
     Fax: 401-846-5989
     Email: tboates@rasmanagement.com

                About Robert Allen Duralee Group

The Robert Allen Duralee Group --
https://www.robertallendesign.com/ -- is a supplier of decorative
fabrics and furniture to the design industry in the United States.
In addition to their own extensive product lines, the Robert Allen
Duralee Group represents six other furnishing companies, including
Paris Texas Hardware, The Finial
Company, Clarke & Clarke, Thibaut and Byron & Byron.  The Robert
Allen Duralee Group maintains showroom premises located in major
metropolitan cities across the United States and Canada, and an
extensive worldwide agent showroom network that collectively
service more than 30 countries around the globe.  Decor is a
privately-owned company with headquarters in Hauppauge, New York.

The Robert Allen Duralee Group, Inc., and 4 related entities,
including ultimate parent Decor Holdings, Inc., sought Chapter 11
protection on Feb. 12, 2019.  The lead case is In re Decor
Holdings, Inc. (Bankr. E.D.N.Y., Lead Case No. 19-71020).

Decor Holdings estimated assets of $50 million to $100 million and
liabilities of $50 million to $100 million as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Hon. Robert E. Grossman is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Hahn & Hessen LLP as counsel; Halperin Battaglia
Benzija, LLP, as special counsel; RAS Management Advisors, LLC, as
restructuring advisor; Blum Shapiro as tax advisor; SSG Capital
Advisors, LLC, as investment banker; Great American as sales agent;
and Omni Management Group, Inc., as claims agent.


DECOR HOLDINGS: Taps Hahn & Hessen as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
Decor Holdings, Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to hire Hahn & Hessen
LLP as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the company and its affiliates of their duties
under the Bankruptcy Code; represent them in negotiation with their
creditors; assist in the preparation of a plan of reorganization;
give advice regarding any potential sale of their assets; and
provide other legal services in connection with their Chapter 11
cases.

Prior to the petition date, the Debtors paid the firm $650,355.84
(including the initial retainer of $250,000) in the ordinary course
of business on account of fees and expenses
incurred during the period April 24, 2018 to February 1, 2019.  

Hahn & Hessen is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Mark T. Power, Esq.
     Janine M. Figueiredo, Esq.
     Jacob T. Schwartz, Esq.
     Jeremiah P. Ledwidge, Esq.
     Hahn & Hessen LLP
     488 Madison Avenue
     New York, New York 10022
     Tel: (212) 478-7200
     Fax: (212) 478-7400
     Email: mpower@hahnhessen.com
            jfigueiredo@hahnhessen.com
            jschwartz2@hahnhessen.com
            jledwidge@hahnhessen.com

               About Robert Allen Duralee Group

The Robert Allen Duralee Group --
https://www.robertallendesign.com/ -- is a supplier of decorative
fabrics and furniture to the design industry in the United States.
In addition to their own extensive product lines, the Robert Allen
Duralee Group represents six other furnishing companies, including
Paris Texas Hardware, The Finial
Company, Clarke & Clarke, Thibaut and Byron & Byron.  The Robert
Allen Duralee Group maintains showroom premises located in major
metropolitan cities across the United States and Canada, and an
extensive worldwide agent showroom network that collectively
service more than 30 countries around the globe.  Decor is a
privately-owned company with headquarters in Hauppauge, New York.

The Robert Allen Duralee Group, Inc., and 4 related entities,
including ultimate parent Decor Holdings, Inc., sought Chapter 11
protection on Feb. 12, 2019. The lead case is In re Decor Holdings,
Inc. (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 19-71020).

Decor Holdings estimated assets of $50 million to $100 million and
liabilities of $50 million to $100 million as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Hon. Robert E. Grossman is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Hahn & Hessen LLP as counsel; Halperin Battaglia
Benzija, LLP, as special counsel; RAS Management Advisors, LLC, as
restructuring advisor; Blum Shapiro as tax advisor; SSG Capital
Advisors, LLC, as investment banker; Great American as sales agent;
and Omni Management Group, Inc., as claims agent.


DECOR HOLDINGS: Taps Halperin Battaglia as Conflicts Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Decor Holdings, Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to hire Halperin
Battaglia Benzija, LLP as conflicts and special counsel.

The firm will represent the company and its affiliates in matters
which are not appropriate for their lead bankruptcy counsel, Hahn &
Hessen LLP, to handle due to conflict of interest with any of their
creditors.

The hourly rates range from $615 to $350 for attorneys and from
$150 to $95 for paraprofessionals.  Halperin received a retainer in
the amount of $50,000 prior to the petition date.

Christopher Battaglia, Esq., at Halperin, disclosed in a court
filing that the firm's attorneys are "disinterested" as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Christopher J. Battaglia, Esq.
     Halperin Battaglia Benzija, LLP
     40 Wall Street - 37th Floor
     New York, NY 10005
     Tel: (212) 765-9100  
     Fax: (212) 765-0964

             About Robert Allen Duralee Group

The Robert Allen Duralee Group --
https://www.robertallendesign.com/ -- is a supplier of decorative
fabrics and furniture to the design industry in the United States.
In addition to their own extensive product lines, the Robert Allen
Duralee Group represents six other furnishing companies, including
Paris Texas Hardware, The Finial Company, Clarke & Clarke, Thibaut
and Byron & Byron.  The Robert Allen Duralee Group maintains
showroom premises located in major metropolitan cities across the
United States and Canada, and an extensive worldwide agent showroom
network that collectively service more than 30 countries around the
globe.  Decor is a privately-owned company with headquarters in
Hauppauge, New York.

The Robert Allen Duralee Group, Inc., and 4 related entities,
including ultimate parent Decor Holdings, Inc., sought Chapter 11
protection on Feb. 12, 2019.  The lead case is In re Decor
Holdings, Inc. (Bankr. E.D.N.Y., Lead Case No. 19-71020).

Decor Holdings estimated assets of $50 million to $100 million and
liabilities of $50 million to $100 million as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Hon. Robert E. Grossman is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Hahn & Hessen LLP as counsel; Halperin Battaglia
Benzija, LLP, as special counsel; RAS Management Advisors, LLC, as
restructuring advisor; Blum Shapiro as tax advisor; SSG Capital
Advisors, LLC, as investment banker; Great American as sales agent;
and Omni Management Group, Inc., as claims agent.


DECOR HOLDINGS: Taps SSG Advisors as Investment Banker
------------------------------------------------------
Decor Holdings, Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to hire SSG Advisors,
LLC.

The firm will provide investment banking services to Decor Holdings
and its affiliates in connection with the acquisition of all or
part of their business and the restructuring of their balance
sheet.  These services include soliciting offers from potential
buyers, assisting the Debtors with the structuring of sale
procedures, and negotiating with stakeholders for a possible
restructuring of existing claims and equity.

SSG will receive an initial fee of $40,000, and a monthly fee of
$40,000 per month.  

Upon consummation of a sale or restructuring transaction, SSG will
receive a fee in cash equal to the greater of (i) $475,000 or (ii)
2.5% of the "total consideration," in each case less a credit equal
to 50% of the previously paid monthly fees.

In the event there is no sale or restructuring transaction and the
Debtors determine to liquidate their assets, then SSG will get
$250,000 in fees and a credit of 50% of the monthly fees will
apply.

J. Scott Victor, managing director of SSG, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

SSG can be reached through:

     J. Scott Victor
     SSG Advisors, LLC
     Five Tower Bridge
     300 Barr Harbor Drive,
     Suite 420
     West Conshohocken, PA 19428
     Phone: 610-940-1094
     Fax: 610-940-3875

             About Robert Allen Duralee Group

The Robert Allen Duralee Group --
https://www.robertallendesign.com/ -- is a supplier of decorative
fabrics and furniture to the design industry in the United States.
In addition to their own extensive product lines, the Robert Allen
Duralee Group represents six other furnishing companies, including
Paris Texas Hardware, The Finial Company, Clarke & Clarke, Thibaut
and Byron & Byron.  The Robert Allen Duralee Group maintains
showroom premises located in major metropolitan cities across the
United States and Canada, and an extensive worldwide agent showroom
network that collectively service more than 30 countries around the
globe.  Decor is a privately-owned company with headquarters in
Hauppauge, New York.

The Robert Allen Duralee Group, Inc., and 4 related entities,
including ultimate parent Decor Holdings, Inc., sought Chapter 11
protection on Feb. 12, 2019. The lead case is In re Decor Holdings,
Inc. (Bankr. E.D.N.Y., Lead Case No. 19-71020).

Decor Holdings estimated assets of $50 million to $100 million and
liabilities of $50 million to $100 million as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Hon. Robert E. Grossman is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Hahn & Hessen LLP as counsel; Halperin Battaglia
Benzija, LLP, as special counsel; RAS Management Advisors, LLC, as
restructuring advisor; Blum Shapiro as tax advisor; SSG Capital
Advisors, LLC, as investment banker; Great American as sales agent;
and Omni Management Group, Inc., as claims agent.


DIRECTVIEW HOLDINGS: Signs $5M Stock Purchase Agreement with Oasis
------------------------------------------------------------------
DirectView Holdings, Inc. entered into an equity purchase agreement
and registration rights agreement on March 22, 2019, with Oasis
Capital, LLC, a Puerto Rico limited liability company.  Under the
terms of the Equity Purchase Agreement, Oasis agreed to purchase
from the Company up to $5,000,000 of the Company's common stock
upon effectiveness of a registration statement on Form S-1 filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and subject to
certain limitations and conditions set forth in the Equity Purchase
Agreement.

Following effectiveness of the Registration Statement, and subject
to certain limitations and conditions set forth in the Equity
Purchase Agreement, the Company will have the discretion to deliver
put notices to Oasis and Oasis will be obligated to purchase shares
of the Company's common stock, par value $0.0001 per share based on
the investment amount specified in each put notice.  The maximum
amount that the Company will be entitled to put to Oasis in each
put notice shall not exceed the lesser of $1,000,000 or 100% of the
average daily trading volume of the Company's Common Stock during
the ten trading days preceding the put.  Pursuant to the Equity
Purchase Agreement, Oasis and its affiliates will not be permitted
to purchase and the Company may not put shares of the Company's
Common Stock to Oasis that would result in Oasis's beneficial
ownership of the Company's outstanding Common Stock exceeding
9.99%. The price of each put share will be equal to 85% of the
Market Price (as defined in the Equity Purchase Agreement).  Puts
may be delivered by the Company to Oasis until the earlier of (i)
the date on which Oasis has purchased an aggregate of $5,000,000
worth of Common Stock under the terms of the Equity Purchase
Agreement, (ii) March 22, 2022, or (iii) written notice of
termination delivered by the Company to Oasis, subject to certain
equity conditions set forth in the Equity Purchase Agreement.

On March 22, 2019, in connection with its entry into the Equity
Purchase Agreement and the Registration Rights Agreement, the
Company issued Commitment Shares (as defined in the Equity Purchase
Agreement) to Oasis.

The Registration Rights Agreement provides that the Company shall
(i) file with the Commission the Registration Statement by May 1,
2019; and (ii) use its best efforts to have the Registration
Statement declared effective by the Commission at the earliest
possible date (in any event, by May 21, 2019).

A full-text copy of the Equity Purchase Agreement is available for
free at https://is.gd/s2zYjr

                     About Directview Holdings

DirectView Holdings, Inc., (DIRV) together with its subsidiaries,
provides video surveillance solutions and teleconferencing products
and services to businesses and organizations.  Based in Boca Raton,
Florida, the company operates in two divisions, Security (Video
Surveillance) and Video Conferencing.  The Security division offers
technologies in surveillance systems providing onsite and remote
video and audio surveillance, digital video recording, and
services.  It also sells and installs surveillance systems; and
sells maintenance agreements.  The company sells its products and
services in the United States and internationally through direct
sales force, referrals, and its websites.  The Video Conferencing
division offers teleconferencing products and serv ices that enable
clients to conduct remote meetings by linking participants in
geographically dispersed locations.  It is involved in the sale of
conferencing services based upon usage, the sale and installation
of video equipment, and the sale of maintenance agreements.  This
division primarily provides conferencing products and services to
numerous organizations ranging from law firms, banks, high tech
companies and government organizations.  DirectView Holdings
maintains two websites at http://www.directview.com/and
http://www.directviewsecurity.com/

DirectView incurred a net loss of $1.55 million in 2017 compared to
a net loss of $4.79 million in 2016.  As of Sept. 30, 2018,
DirectView had $2.48 million in total assets, $27.23 million in
total liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $24.75
million.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Assurance
Dimensions on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017, includes an explanatory paragraph stating that
the Company had a net loss and cash used from operations of
approximately $1.5 million and $420,000, respectively for the year
ended of Dec. 31, 2017 and a working capital deficit of
approximately $13 million.  These conditions raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


DLJ INVESTMENTS: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: DLJ Investments, LTD
        10520 Bondesson Circle
        Omaha, NE 68122

Business Description: DLJ Investments, LTD owns in fee simple a
                      real estate located at 1600 S Pine Rd
                      Norfolk, NE 68701, having an appraised
                      value of $2.96 million.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 27, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Nebraska (Omaha Office)

Case No.: 19-80494

Judge: Hon. Thomas L. Saladino

Debtor's Counsel: Kathryn J. Derr, Esq.
                  KATHRYN J. DERR, PC, LLO
                  1301 South 75th Street, Suite 100
                  Omaha, NE 68124
                  Tel: (402) 827-7000
                  Fax: (402) 827-7001
                  E-mail: kderr@berkshire-law.com

Total Assets: $4,368,171

Total Liabilities: $4,593,106

The petition was signed by Dean De Smet, general partner.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's five unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/neb19-80494.pdf


DRIVE CHASSIS: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR & Rates $850MM Loan Caa1
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B2 Corporate Family Rating and
a B2-PD Probability of Default Rating to Drive Chassis Holdco, LLC
("Drive Chassis") in connection with the acquisition of chassis
equipment provider Direct ChassisLink, Inc. ("DCLI") by funds
managed by Apollo Global Management, LLC. Moody's also assigned a
Caa1 rating to the new $850 million senior secured second lien term
loan that Drive Chassis plans to arrange. The ratings outlook is
stable.

All ratings of the debt of Deck Chassis Acquisition Inc., the
former parent company of DCLI, will be withdrawn upon closing of
the transaction.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B2 Corporate Family Rating takes into account DCLI's positon as
one of three main providers of chassis rental equipment for the
transportation of containerized cargo, expectations of high margins
and meaningful free cash flow, but elevated financial leverage.

With a fleet of more than 232,000 chassis, DCLI is active in the
marine segment as well as the domestic segment of the market. In
the domestic intermodal transport segment, DCLI is the sole
provider of chassis pools for the transportation of 53' containers
that are used by North American freight railroads and other large
transportation and logistics companies. Access to port terminals,
the capital that is required to build a sizeable fleet, the
efficiency of the equipment pool model in the industry, and
entrenched customer relationships establish barriers to enter this
market and mitigate the risk that DCLI's customers decide to
acquire their own chassis equipment.

Moody's expects EBITDA margins to be 38% in 2019, calculated on a
Moody's adjusted basis, taking into account that a substantial
portion of expenses incurred last year in connection with DCLI's
domestic fleet acquisition and certain contract changes will likely
not recur in 2019. EBITDA margins could be pressured, however, if
DCLI is unable to manage maintenance and repair expenses
effectively, when negotiating rates with large customers upon
contract renewals, and due to costs related to new contracts.

Furthermore, debt/EBITDA is nearly 6.5 times in 2019 according to
Moody's estimates, a level that is very high considering that DCLI
remains susceptible to the risk of an economic downturn,
notwithstanding that a substantial majority of revenue is derived
from multi-year contracts.

Moody's considers Drive Chassis's liquidity to be adequate, taking
into account its ability to generate meaningful free cash flow
(about $45 million in 2019), the absence of material debt
maturities until 2024 and close to $300 million that is expected to
be available under the new $1 billion asset-based revolving credit
facility upon closing of the transaction.

The new $850 million senior secured term loan due 2026 is rated
Caa1, two notches below the B2 CFR. This reflects the higher
ranking in Moody's Loss Given Default analysis of the $1 billion
asset-based revolving credit facility that has a first-priority
claim on DCLI's assets compared to the second-priority security
interest of the term loan.

The stable ratings outlook reflects Moody's expectation of
moderating increases in chassis usage in 2019 in both the domestic
and marine segments of the containerized transportation market and
that EBITDA margins expand to 38% from 33% in 2018.

The ratings could be upgraded if Drive Chassis is able to maintain
EBITDA margins close to 40%, while lowering debt/EBITDA towards 5
times, increasing EBIT/interest to at least 1.5 times and
generating free cash flow that is in excess of $75 million.

The ratings could be downgraded if Moody's expects that EBITDA
margins decrease to less than 35%, debt/EBITDA will exceed 6.5
times, EBIT/interest decreases to less than 1 time, or that free
cash flow is not consistently positive.

Assignments:

Issuer: Drive Chassis Holdco, LLC

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B2-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B2

Gtd Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned Caa1 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Drive Chassis Holdco, LLC

Outlook, Assigned Stable

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global Surface
Transportation and Logistics Companies published in May 2017.

Drive Chassis Holdco, LLC indirectly owns Direct ChassisLink, Inc.
Headquartered in Charlotte, NC, Direct ChassisLink, Inc. is a
leading provider of chassis equipment to the U.S. intermodal
transportation industry. Revenues in 2018 were approximately $550
million, excluding revenues from software management services. As
part of the transaction with Apollo, current owner EQT
Infrastructure will retain a 20% minority stake in DCLI.


DUMITRU MEDICAL: Unsecureds to Get 5% in 8 Quarterly Payments
-------------------------------------------------------------
Dumitru Medical Center PC, Doctor One House Call Physicians PC and
their president Dumitru O. Sandulescu, filed a plan of
reorganization and accompanying disclosure statement.

Class VI: Class VI shall consist of the pre-petition general
unsecured non-priority claims against the Debtors, including the
trade vendor claims against DMC, and Doctor One and the general
claims against Sandulescu, including the unsecured non-priority
claims of the taxing authorities to the extent such exist. The
Debtors have estimated that the Class VI general non-priority
unsecured claims against the Debtors, including the non-priority
claims of the taxing authorities total approximately $274,633.09.
The Debtors shall make a five (5%) percent distribution to its
Class VI creditors on a pro rata basis in eight (8) equal quarterly
distributions beginning on the last business day of the second
(2nd) calendar quarter of 2020 and continuing on the last business
day of each consecutive calendar quarter until paid in full.

Class I: Class I shall consist of Executory Contract Arrearage
Claims are impaired. Class I shall consist of the arrearage claims
of the executory contract holders of the Debtors. The Debtors do
not believe that there are any executory contract arrearage claims.
To the extent there are any unpaid executory contract arrearage
claims on the Confirmation Date, such Class I claims will be paid
in full on the Effective Date. The Debtors hereby specifically
reject the lease with Great American Financial Services, American
Financial, LLC and Ascentium Capital. The Debtors hereby reject all
executory contracts not specifically assumed.

Class II: This Class are impaired and shall consist of the allowed
secured tax claims of Internal Revenue Service, the State of
Michigan, Department of Treasury and the State of Michigan,
Unemployment Insurance Agency, to the extent such claims exist,
including the unpaid trust fund taxes assessed against Sandulescu
for the unpaid trust fund taxes of DMC. The unpaid trust fund taxes
are all paid through this Plan directly by DMC as either priority
or secured tax claims. The allowed secured tax claims of the
Internal Revenue Service, the State of Michigan, Department of
Treasury and the State of Michigan, Unemployment Insurance Agency,
shall be paid in equal monthly payments beginning on the
twenty-eighth (28th) day of the first full month after the
Effective Date and continuing on the twenty-eighth (28th) day of
each consecutive month thereafter until such time as the secured
claims of the taxing authorities are paid in full. The Internal
Revenue Service received $88,078.94 from the proceeds of the sale
of the Cleveland Properties which was to be applied to its secured
claim for the Sandulescu's 2011 and 2013 income tax liabilities.

Class III: Class III are impaired and shall consist of the secured
real and personal property tax claims of the City of Sterling
Heights, the Charter Township of Shelby, and the Macomb County
Treasurer, to the extent such claims exist, in connection with
personal and real property taxes owned by the DMC, Doctor One
Housecall and Sandulescu. The allowed secured tax claims of the
Property Tax Creditors shall be paid in equal monthly payments
beginning on the twenty-eighth (28th) day of the first full month
after the Effective Date and continuing on the twenty-eighth (28th)
day of each consecutive month thereafter until such time as the
secured claims of the Treasurers are paid in full. The secured tax
claim of the Property Tax Creditors shall be paid within sixty (60)
months of the Petition Date.

Class IV: The Class IV are impaired and shall consist of the
secured claim of United Midwest Business Capital, as a division of
United Midwest Savings Bank, against DMC and Doctor One in
connection with a Loan Agreement in the amount of $588,000 for the
purchase of the Van Dyke Property.  The United Midwest Loan is
secured by DMC's and Doctor One's personal property and a mortgage
in the Van Dyke Property.  On the Petition Date, the unpaid balance
on the United Midwest Loan was approximately $366,851.  On the
Petition Date, the Debtors were past due on their payments to
United Midwest in the amount of $9,946.  The Debtors shall continue
to pay United Midwest pursuant to the terms of the United Midwest
Loan until the United Midwest Loan is paid in full. Beginning in
the first full month after the Effective Date, the Debtors shall
pay an additional $500.00 to United Midwest at the time the regular
monthly payment is made to be applied against the United Midwest
Default Amount until the United Midwest Default Amount is paid in
full.

Class VII: Class VII shall consist of the claims of DMC's and
Doctor One's principal, Debtor Sandulescu. Within ninety (90) days
of the Effective Date, Debtor Sandulescu shall transfer $5,000 to
DMC in exchange for the retention of his shareholder interest in
DMC and Doctor One.

DMC's chief source of income is its stream of revenue generated
from the services provided by Sandulescu to its patient based. DMC
receives payments in connection with services provided to patients
from Medicare and several private insurance carriers. DMC receives
limited revenue directly from private patients. In addition, DMC
and Doctor One receive revenue from tenants in the Omni Center.As
an owner occupied facility, the rental payments from tenants cover
the bulk, but not all of the costs to maintain and operate the Omni
Center, including the mortgage payments, real property taxes,
utilities, insurances and maintenance.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 20, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y2h5jtw9from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                About Dumitru Medical Center

Dumitru Medical Center PC, Doctor One House Call Physicians PC and
their president Dumitru O. Sandulescu sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Lead Case No.
18-52936) on Sept. 21, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Mr. Sandulescu, DMC, estimated assets of
less than $1 million and liabilities of less than $1 million.
Doctor One estimated less than $1 million in assets and less than
$500,000 in liabilities.   

The Debtors tapped Lynn M. Brimer, Esq., at Strobl & Sharp, PC, as
their bankruptcy counsel.  Howard Hanna R.E.S. is the Debtors' real
estate broker.


E.W. SCRIPPS: S&P Rates New $525MM Sr. Sec. Debt 'BB'
-----------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB' issue-level rating and '1'
recovery rating to U.S.-based TV broadcaster The E.W. Scripps Co.'s
proposed $525 million incremental senior secured term loan B
maturing in 2026. The '1' recovery rating indicates S&P's
expectation for very high recovery (90%-100%; rounded estimate:
95%) for lenders in the event of a payment default.

The company plans to use the proceeds from the proposed term loan
to fund its previously announced acquisition of 15 television
stations from Cordillera Communications for $521 million. S&P also
lowered the issue-level rating on the company's existing $400
million senior unsecured notes to 'B' from 'B+', and revised the
recovery rating to '5' from '3', reflecting the incremental senior
secured debt in its capital structure, which reduces the value
available to the unsecured noteholders in a hypothetical default
scenario. The '5' recovery rating indicates S&P's expectation for
modest recovery (10%-30%; rounded estimate: 10%) for lenders in the
event of a payment default.

All of S&P's ratings, including its 'B+' issuer credit rating,
remain on CreditWatch with negative implications pending its
evaluation of the quality of E.W. Scripps' combined station
portfolio following the company's recently announced acquisition of
eight television stations from Nexstar for $580 million, which S&P
expects to be funded with debt."  

ISSUE RATINGS - RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors

The E.W. Scripps Co. is the borrower of the debt. The credit
facility is guaranteed by the company's subsidiaries and is secured
by substantially all of the company's assets, excluding real
estate.

Simulated default assumptions

S&P's simulated default scenario contemplates a default in 2023 due
to the following factors: competitive pressure from alternative
media, lower advertising demand as a result of economic weakness,
failure to generate retransmission revenue commensurate with its
local market and relevant TV networks, pressure from affiliated
networks to remit a significant portion of retransmission fees,
difficulty integrating acquisitions, or a combination of these
factors leading to a larger-than-expected drop in EBITDA during a
non-election year.

Other default assumptions include an 85% draw on the revolving
credit facility, LIBOR is 2.5%, the spread on the revolving credit
facility increases to 5% as covenant amendments are obtained, and
all debt includes six months of prepetition interest.

Simplified waterfall

-- EBITDA at emergence: $160 million
-- EBITDA multiple: 6.5x
-- Gross recovery value: About $1 billion
-- Net recovery value after administrative expenses (5%): About
$990 million
-- Value available for secured debt: About $990 million
-- Senior secured debt: About $945 million
    --Recovery expectations: 90%-100% (rounded estimate: 95%)
-- Value available for senior unsecured debt: About $45 million
-- Senior unsecured debt: About $410 million
-- Recovery expectations: 10%-30% (rounded estimate: 10%)

  RATINGS LIST
  The E.W. Scripps Co.
   Issuer Credit Rating                  B+/Watch Neg/--

  New Rating

  The E.W. Scripps Co.
   Senior Secured
    $525 mil. term loan B due 2026       BB/Watch Neg
     Recovery rating                     1(95%)

  Issue-Level Ratings Lowered; Recovery Ratings Revised
                               To             From
  The E.W. Scripps Co.
   Senior Unsecured            B/Watch Neg    B+/Watch Neg
      Recovery rating          5(10%)         3(55%)


ELMIRA, NY: S&P Affirms 'BB+' Long-Term Rating on GO Debts
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB+' long-term rating and
underlying rating (SPUR) on Elmira, N.Y.'s general obligation (GO)
debt. The outlook is stable.  

"The rating reflects our view of the city's ongoing challenges to
align revenue and expenditures to maintain structural balance while
eliminating its large negative fund balance," said S&P Global
Ratings credit analyst Nora Wittstruck.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's view of improved financial
results for fiscal years 2017 and 2018 that are indicative of
management's efforts to control discretionary costs despite its
high fixed-cost burden.


ENERGY TRANSFER: Fitch Withdraws BB+ Rating on Remaining Sec. Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded Energy Transfer, LP's (ET) Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'BBB-' from 'BB', removed ET from
Positive Watch, and has assigned a Stable Rating Outlook. In
addition, Fitch has withdrawn the 'BB+'/'RR1' ratings on ET's
existing/remaining senior secured notes, which are no longer
secured and have been exchanged for senior unsecured notes at
Energy Transfer Operating, LP (ETO).

Whatever minimal notes remain outstanding will continue to be
serviced, but they are no longer a material piece of ET's capital
structure and are subordinate to all ETO obligations and
obligations at ET and ETO's other operating subsidiaries. In
conjunction with this upgrade, Fitch has affirmed ETO's Long-Term
IDR and senior unsecured ratings at 'BBB-'/Stable Outlook. Fitch
has also assigned a 'BBB-' rating to Energy Transfer Operating,
LP's notes due 2020, 2023, 2024, and 2027, which have been issued
in exchange for the legacy ET notes.

Additionally, Fitch has affirmed the 'BBB-' Long-Term IDRs and
senior unsecured ratings of ETO's wholly owned operating
subsidiaries ETP Legacy, LP, Sunoco Logistics Partners Operations,
LP and Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co. (PEPL), as well as PEPL's
junior subordinated notes at 'BB'. Fitch has withdrawn the IDR
associated with ETP Legacy, LP as that entity's debt now resides
under ETO. Fitch had previously listed legacy Energy Transfer
Partners, LP issued debt under ETP Legacy, LP. The debt is now
listed under Energy Transfer Operating, LP and has been affirmed.

Fitch has affirmed and withdrawn Sunoco Logistics Partners
Operations, LP 'F3' Short-term IDR and Commercial Paper ratings.
The Sunoco Logistics Partners Operations, LP Short-term IDR and CP
rating is no longer applicable as ETO is the issuer of commercial
paper so that rating is being withdrawn.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Size, Scale, Operational and Geographic Diversity: ETO's ratings
reflect its significant size, scale, operating and geographic
diversity. ET is one of the largest MLPs and one of the largest
midstream companies in North America. ETO's geographic and business
line diversity provides a solid operating asset base and a decent
platform for growth within most of the major U.S. production
regions. The company owns and operates roughly 83,000 miles of
natural gas, crude and natural gas liquids (NGL) pipelines, 65
processing plants, treating plants and fractionators, significant
compression, and large scale, underground liquid and natural gas
storage. Additionally, ETO has remaining interests in Sunoco, LP
(SUN; BB/Stable) and USA Compression (USAC; BB-/Stable) and the
interest in ET LNG, which will provide additional cash flow
diversity and a relatively stable stream of cash flow to ETO and
ultimately to ET.

Exchange Alleviates Some Structural Concerns: The completed note
exchange effectively alleviates the structural subordination ET
debt had to ETO senior debt and hybrid securities. ET now wholly
owns its main operating partnership subsidiary ETO aligning the
interests of ET and ETO, Fitch believes the "simplification"
transaction is positive for ET's credit profile, as the partnership
alleviates the structural subordination that ET's debt has to
ETO's. Going forward Fitch intends to rate ET and ETO on a
consolidated basis at ETO's current rating levels provided that ETO
remains the main debt issuing entity between ET and ETO. Relative
to its Parent Subsidiary Ratings Criteria, Fitch believes the
legal, operating, and strategic ties between a ET and ETO to be
strong and believes that a consolidated rating approach between the
two is warranted. ETO debt remains structurally subordinate to debt
at some of its operating subsidiaries, notably, Sunoco, LP and USA
Compression, LP (USAC). Fitch rates SUN and USAC based on their
individual standalone credit profile, without any explicit linkage
to ET or ETO's ratings. Fitch believes SUN and USAC will remain
publicly traded partnership subsidiaries of ETO in the near to
intermediate term with little likelihood of further interfamily
consolidation.

Project Execution Risk: Fitch remains concerned by the fair amount
of execution, regulatory, and legal risks associated with ETO's
ongoing project backlog and recently completed projects currently
facing increased scrutiny or ongoing construction delays. Capital
spending is expected to remain high over the next two years as
ET/ETO continues to complete several large-scale projects including
Mariner East 2 (ME2), and Revolution Pipeline system, and cash
flows ramp up. Some regulatory uncertainty remains surrounding the
construction of several ETO projects, which has led to some delays,
but ET is successfully completing its projects with ME 2, most
recently completed in late December 2018. Additional concerns
include some commodity price and volumetric risks, potential
funding execution risk, and the potential for future interfamily
transactions.

Relatively Stable Cash Flows: Fitch expects ETO to maintain a high
level of fee-based or hedged cash flow in excess of 75%. As ETO has
grown its asset base, the percentage of gross margin supported by
fee-based contracts has increased, with the partnership moving
towards being largely fee-based or hedged, due in part to new
projects coming online with heavy fee-based components.
Counterparty exposure is weighted toward investment-grade names.
Recently, ETO has benefited from favorable basis differentials
along its intrastate gas pipeline system in Texas allowing,
boosting 2018 EBITDA performance in that business segment, but this
is expected to be temporary as differentials normalize once
takeaway capacity comes online in the near to intermediate term.

Adequate Metrics: Fitch expects leverage at ET to improve in 2019
at roughly 4.7x to 5.0x on a fully consolidated basis. On an ET/ETO
only basis, exclusive of SUN EBITDA and debt and USAC EBITDA and
debt, inclusive of distributions from SUN and USAC, exclusive of
fully consolidated non-wholly owned joint venture EBITDA and debt
but inclusive of cash distributions from joint ventures, Fitch
expects leverage of between 5.0x and 5.2x for 2019, with some
improvement toward 4.5x - 4.7x in 2020 and 2021 as projects are
completed and capital spending moderates. Fitch also expects ETO to
possess a consolidated credit and business risk profile consistent
with recent history, the agency's expectations for 'BBB-' midstream
issuers, and comparable large-scale midstream peers, and an
improved distribution coverage profile given the removal of its
incentive distribution burden.

Parent Subsidiary Rating Linkage:  Fitch has linked ET's and ETO's
IDRs to reflect the strong operational, legal and strategic ties
between the entities. Under PSL Criteria, Fitch assesses ETO (the
subsidiary) as having the stronger stand-alone credit profile
(SCP), given its structural superiority to ET and ET's reliance on
cash distributions from ETO to ultimately service any ET
obligations.

PEPL's ratings reflect Stronger Parent/Weaker Subsidiary rating
path with strong operation and strategic ties, and moderate legal
ties. Fitch views ETO as having a stronger standalone credit
profile relative to PEPL, given the sheer size, scale and diversity
of ETO relative to PEPL. With strong operating, strategic, and
moderate legal ties between the entities PEPL's ratings have been
directly linked to those of ETO. Fitch expects that future debt
maturities will be financed through issuance at the ETO level. ETO
is expected to provide any liquidity needs to PEPL and refinance
any PEPL maturities at the ETO level and take any excess cash flow
to use at ETO. PEPL's standalone credit profile is consistent with
a 'BBB-' or better IDR; however, given their strategic, operational
and legal ties, Fitch believes it appropriate to link PEPL's
ratings with those of its parent ETO. An upgrade or downgrade at
ETO would likely lead to an upgrade or downgrade at PEPL.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

ETO's ratings reflect the size and scale of its operations, which
offer both business line diversity and geographic diversity, with
operations spanning most major domestic production basins. ET/ETO's
size and scale are consistent with Fitch's expectations for
investment grade midstream issuers. The ratings consider ET/ETO's
high adjusted leverage, relative to 'BBB-' rated midstream
entities. Fitch typically looks for leverage (as defined as Total
Debt with Equity Credit/Adjusted EBITDA) below 5.0x on a sustained
basis for large, diversified midstream issuers at the 'BBB-' rating
level. ETO's revenue profile is supported by long-term contracts
with a heavy fixed fee component, consistent with its investment
grade rating.

The ratings consider that ET's consolidated leverage (debt/adjusted
EBITDA) is currently high, relative to 'BBB-' rated midstream
entities, which typically have leverage (debt/EBITDA) between 4.0x
and 5.0x depending on their asset base, size, scale and cash flow
profile. A consolidated ET is one of the largest, diversified
master limited partnerships (MLPs). The company's assets span most
of the major U.S. oil and gas production regions, similar to the
higher rated MLP Enterprise Products Partners, L.P. (EPD). Fitch
rates EPD's operating subsidiary Enterprise Products Operating
Company LLC 'BBB+'/Stable. Fitch expects ET/ETO's leverage metrics
(Debt/EBITDA) to improve to below 5.0x in early 2020 and beyond,
though slightly higher than it was in 2019, after adjusting for 50%
debt credit to ETO's preferred stock and junior subordinated notes
and deconsolidating the fully consolidated Bakken Pipeline of which
ETO is a 30% owner. These levels are in line with similarly rated
large-scale midstream peers like Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI;
BBB-/Stable; 2018 year-end leverage of 4.8x), and Williams
Companies (WMB; BBB-/Positive; 2018 year-end leverage of
approximately 4.9x), but slightly worse than Enterprise Products
Partners, LP (EPD; Fitch rates EPD's debt issuing operating
subsidiary BBB+/Stable; EPD leverage at 2018 year-end of
approximately 3.5x). Fitch notes that it expects KMI leverage to be
closer to 4.5x following the sale of its TransMountain Pipeline
project and the application of those proceeds to debt reduction.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  -- 2019 Capital spending consistent with management public
guidance. 2020-2022 growth capital spending of between $12.5 and
$15 billion cumulatively.

  -- Growth spending funding needs met with debt issuance and
preferred equity; minimal common equity issued in forecast period
with minimal amounts of common equity issued annually associated
with DRIP program.

  -- 2019 distribution of $1.22 per unit with modest growth in 2020
and beyond focused on maintain robust distribution coverage.

  -- USAC and SUN forecasts consistent with Fitch base case
forecasts for USAC (May 2018) and SUN (January 2019).

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- A material improvement in credit metrics with the
partnership's adjusted leverage as defined below at between 4.0x
and 4.3x on a sustained basis along with distribution coverage
above 1.2x.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- Inability or unwillingness to fund growth capital needs at ETO
in a credit friendly manner.

  -- ET Leverage (Total ET/ETO Debt with Equity Credit/Adjusted
EBITDA excluding USAC and SUN debt and EBITDA but including
distributions from USAC and SUN; and deconsolidating debt and
EBITDA from the Bakken Pipeline, but including the ET's
proportional share of Bakken Pipeline expected distributions; as
well as deconsolidating EBITDA from consolidated but not wholly
owned joint ventures, but inclusive of ET's proportional share of
cash distributions from those entities) is expected to be just
above  5.0x in 2019. Should leverage be expected to be above 5.0x
on sustained basis in 2020  and beyond it could lead to a negative
rating action.

  -- Increasing commodity exposure above 30% at the ETO legacy
operating segments could lead to a negative rating action if
leverage were not appropriately decreased to account for
increased earnings and cash flow volatility.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity Adequate: Fitch expects ETO's liquidity to remain
adequate. As of Dec. 31, 2018 ETO had roughly $3.69 billion in
outstanding borrowings under its credit facility, with availability
at year-end of roughly $1.31 billion. Additionally, ETO has full
availability under a $1.0 billion 364-day credit facility, which
matures on Nov. 19, 2019. On Oct. 19, 2018, ETO's five-year credit
facility was amended to increase the borrowing capacity by $1.0
billion to $5.0 billion total and to extend the maturity to
December 2023. ETO's credit facilities contain various covenants,
including limitations on the creation of indebtedness and liens,
and related to the operation and conduct business. The credit
facilities also limit ETO on a rolling four-quarter basis, to a
maximum Consolidated Funded Indebtedness to Consolidated EBITDA
ratio, as defined in the underlying credit agreements, of 5.0x,
which can generally be increased to 5.5x during a specified
acquisition period. ETO was in compliance with its covenants as of
Dec. 31, 2018 and Fitch expects continued covenant compliance in
the near to intermediate term.

Maturities should be manageable on a consolidated basis, with no
one year having too high of a maturity wall, but with a consistent
need to access debt markets for refinancing. Proceeds from ETO's
recent offering of $4.0 billion in senior unsecured notes were used
to address ET's term loan, which was paid in full and terminated,
2019 maturities at ETO and PEPL and to free up revolver
availability in the near term.]

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has taken the following Rating Action:

Energy Transfer, LP

  -- Long-Term IDR upgraded to 'BBB-' from 'BB'; Removed from
Positive Watch.

Fitch has withdrawn the senior secured 'BB+'/'RR1' ratings from
Energy Transfer, LP's senior secured notes that have been offered
to exchange to Energy Transfer Operating, LP Notes.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

Energy Transfer Operating, LP

  -- Long-term IDR affirmed at 'BBB-';

  -- Senior Unsecured Notes affirmed at 'BBB-';

  -- Senior Unsecured Notes due 2020, 2023, 2024 and 2027 issued in
exchange for ET debt rated 'BBB-'.

  -- Short-Term IDR rated 'F3';

  -- Commercial Paper Rating (ET) affirmed at 'F3';

  -- Junior Subordinated ET Notes affirmed at 'BB';

  -- Preferred Equity Rating (ET) affirmed at 'BB'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

Sunoco Logistics Partners Operations, LP

  -- Long-Term IDR affirmed at 'BBB-';

  -- Senior Unsecured Notes affirmed at 'BBB-';

  -- Short-Term IDR affirmed at 'F3' and withdrawn;
  
The Rating Outlook is Stable.

Fitch has affirmed the following:

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.

  -- Long-Term IDR at 'BBB-';

  -- Senior Unsecured Notes at 'BBB-';

  -- Junior Subordinated Notes at 'BB'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

ETP Legacy, LP

  -- Long-Term IDR at 'BBB-' and withdrawn;

  -- Short-Term IDR at 'F3' and withdrawn;

The ETP Legacy Senior Unsecured Notes, Junior Subordinated Notes,
Commercial Paper, and preferred Equity are now all under Energy
Transfer Operating, LP (ETO).

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


EXITO JC: Espinal Suit Alleges FLSA Violation
---------------------------------------------
Carlos Alberto Espinal, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Exito JC Inc., aka Exito Fresh Market et al.,
Case No. 2:19-cv-07744 (D. N.J., March 4, 2019), is brought against
the Defendants for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and
the New Jersey State Wage and Hour Law.

The Plaintiff and potential plaintiffs who elect to opt-in as part
of the collective action are all victims of the Defendants' common
policy and plan to violate the FLSA and NJWHL by failing to provide
overtime wages, at the rate of one and one half times the regular
rate of pay, for all time worked in excess of 40 hours in any given
week, notes the complaint.

The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendants full time as a
non-exempt laborer, from in or about September 2016, to in or about
February 1, 2019.

The Defendant Exito JC is headquartered in Jersey City, New Jersey.
The Defendants own and maintain a retail grocery store with several
locations throughout New Jersey. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Andrew I. Glenn, Esq.
      Jodi J. Jaffe, Esq.
      JAFFE GLENN LAW GROUP, P.A.
      301 N. Harrison Street, Suite 9F, #306
      Princeton, NJ 08540
      Tel: (201) 687-9977
      Fax: (201) 595-0308
      E-mail: AGlenn@JaffeGlenn.com
              JJaffe@JaffeGlenn.com



FANNIE MAE: Appoints Hugh Frater as CEO
---------------------------------------
Hugh R. Frater was appointed Fannie Mae's chief executive officer,
effective as of March 26, 2019.

Mr. Frater, age 63, previously had been serving as Fannie Mae's
interim chief executive officer since October 2018 and has been a
member of Fannie Mae's Board of Directors since January 2016.
Prior to his appointment as Fannie Mae's interim chief executive
officer, Mr. Frater had been an independent director of Fannie Mae,
where he most recently served on the Audit Committee and the Risk
Policy and Capital Committee.  Mr. Frater also serves as
non-executive chairman of the Board of VEREIT, Inc.  Mr. Frater
previously worked at Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC, a commercial
real estate company providing comprehensive capital solutions and
investment sales advisory and research services for multifamily and
commercial properties.  He served as Chairman of Berkadia from
April 2014 to December 2015 and he served as chief executive
officer of Berkadia from 2010 to April 2014.  From 2007 to 2010,
Mr. Frater was the chief operating officer of Good Energies, Inc.,
and from 2004 to 2007, Mr. Frater was an executive vice president
at The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., where he led the real
estate division.  Mr. Frater was a founding partner and managing
director of BlackRock, Inc. from 1988 to 2004, where he led the
real estate practice.  Mr. Frater serves on the MBA Real Estate
Program Advisory Board at the Columbia University Graduate School
of Business and is also a member of its Board of Overseers.

Mr. Frater's direct compensation as chief executive officer will
continue to consist solely of base salary at the rate of $600,000
per year.  Mr. Frater will also continue to be eligible to receive
employee benefits, as described in Fannie Mae's annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on Feb. 14, 2019.  In connection
with Mr. Frater's appointment as Fannie Mae's chief executive
officer, he has been offered relocation benefits to reimburse him
for his costs associated with relocating to the Washington, DC
area. These relocation benefits are conditioned on Mr. Frater's
continued employment with Fannie Mae for a minimum of 18 months
from his start date as chief executive officer—he must reimburse
Fannie Mae 100% of the relocation benefits paid to him if his
employment terminates (either voluntarily or involuntarily due to
misconduct) within 12 months, or 50% if his employment terminates
from the 13th through the 18th month.

                 About Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Federal National Mortgage Association (OTCQB: FNMA), commonly known
as Fannie Mae -- http://www.FannieMae.com/-- is a
government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) that was chartered by U.S.
Congress in 1938 to support liquidity, stability and affordability
in the secondary mortgage market, where existing mortgage-related
assets are purchased and sold.  Through its single-family and
multifamily business segments, the Company provided approximately
$570 billion in liquidity to the mortgage market in 2017, which
enabled the financing of approximately 3 million home purchases,
refinancings or rental units.

A brother organization of Fannie Mae is the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), better known as Freddie Mac.  Freddie
Mac (OTCBB: FMCC) -- http://www.FreddieMac.com/-- was established
by Congress in 1970 to provide liquidity, stability and
affordability to the nation's residential mortgage markets.
Freddie Mac supports communities across the nation by providing
mortgage capital to lenders.

               ABOUT FANNIE MAE'S CONSERVATORSHIP
                  AND AGREEMENTS WITH TREASURY

Fannie Mae has operated under the conservatorship of FHFA since
Sept. 6, 2008.  Treasury has made a commitment under a senior
preferred stock purchase agreement to provide funding to Fannie Mae
under certain circumstances if the company has a net worth deficit.
Pursuant to this agreement and the senior preferred stock the
company issued to Treasury in 2008, the Director of FHFA has
directed Fannie Mae to pay dividends to Treasury on a quarterly
basis since entering into conservatorship in 2008 for every
dividend period for which dividends were payable.

Fannie Mae expects to pay Treasury a first quarter 2019 dividend of
$3.2 billion by March 31, 2019.  The senior preferred stock
provides for dividends each quarter in the amount, if any, by which
the company's net worth as of the end of the prior quarter exceeds
a $3.0 billion capital reserve amount.

As of Feb. 14, 2019, the maximum amount of remaining funding under
the agreement is $113.9 billion.  If the company were to draw
additional funds from Treasury under the agreement with respect to
a future period, the amount of remaining funding under the
agreement would be reduced by the amount of our draw.  Dividend
payments the company makes to Treasury do not restore or increase
the amount of funding available to it under the agreement.

Although Treasury owns Fannie Mae's senior preferred stock and a
warrant to purchase 79.9% percent of the company's common stock,
and has made a commitment under a senior preferred stock purchase
agreement to provide the company with funds to maintain a positive
net worth under specified conditions, the U.S. government does not
guarantee the company's securities or other obligations.


FNJCC CORP: Plan, Disclosures Hearing Scheduled for April 25
------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Edward A. Godoy conditionally approved FNJCC
Corporation's disclosure statement referring to a chapter 11 plan
of reorganization dated March 15, 2019.

Written acceptances or rejections of the Plan and any objection to
the final approval of the Disclosure Statement and/or the
confirmation of the Plan may be filed 14 days prior to the date of
the hearing on confirmation of the Plan.

A hearing for the consideration of the final approval of the
Disclosure Statement and the confirmation of the Plan will be held
on April 25, 2019 at 9:30 AM at the United States Bankruptcy Court,
Southwestern Divisional Office, MCS Building, Second Floor, 880
Tito Castro Avenue, Ponce, Puerto Rico.

                   About FNJCC Corp.

FNJCC Corporation sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 18-05552) on Sept. 26,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.  The
Debtor tapped Modesto Bigas Law Office as its legal counsel.


FORD CHILDREN: Seeks to Hire Eric A. Liepins as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Ford Children Heritage Trust seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas to hire Eric A.
Liepins, P.C., as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its duties under the Bankruptcy
Code and will provide other legal services in connection with its
Chapter 11 case.

The firm will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Eric Liepins, Esq.                   $275
     Paralegals/Legal Assistants        $30 - $50

Liepins received a retainer of $5,000 plus the filing fee.

The firm does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor's
bankruptcy estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
     Eric A. Liepins, P.C.
     12770 Coit Road, Suite 1100
     Dallas, TX 75251
     Telephone: (972) 991-5591
     Facsimile: (972) 991-5788
     E-mail: eric@ealpc.com

                 About Ford Children Heritage Trust

The Ford Children Heritage Trust sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-40952) on
March 4, 2019.  The case is assigned to Judge Edward L. Morris.
Eric A. Liepins, P.C., is the Debtor's legal counsel.



GLYECO INC: Stockholders Elect 5 Directors at Annual Meeting
------------------------------------------------------------
GlyEco, Inc. held an Annual Meeting on March 25, 2019, at which
the Company's stockholders:

    (i) elected Dwight B. Mamanteo, Charles F. Trapp, Frank
Kneller,
        Scott Nussbaum, and Richard Geib as directors;

   (ii) ratified the appointment of KMJ Corbin & Company, LLP as
the
        Company's independent auditors for the fiscal year ending
        Dec. 31, 2018;

  (iii) ratified the appointment of KMJ Corbin & Company, LLP as
the
        Company's independent auditors for the fiscal year ending
        Dec. 31, 2019;

   (iv) approved the reincorporation of the Company from the State
        of Nevada to the State of Delaware; and

    (v) approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the
        Company's named executive officers.

The term of office for each director will be until the next Annual
Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.

                        About GlyEco, Inc.

GlyEco, Inc. -- http://www.glyeco.com/-- is a developer,
manufacturer and distributor of performance fluids for the
automotive, commercial and industrial markets.  The Company
specializes in coolants, additives and complementary fluids.  The
Company's network of facilities, develop, manufacture and
distribute products including a wide spectrum of ready to use
anti-freezes and additive packages for the antifreeze/coolant, gas
patch coolants and heat transfer fluid industries, throughout North
America. The Company is headquartered in Rock Hill, South Carolina,
and operates six facilities in the U.S.

Glyeco incurred a net loss of $5.18 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2017, compared to a net loss of $2.26 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of Sept. 30, 2018, the Company had $12.09
million in total assets, $11.28 million in total liabilities, and
$806,467 in total stockholders' equity.

In its report dated April 2, 2018 with respect to the Company's
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
KMJ Corbin & Company LLP, the Company's independent registered
public accounting firm since 2015, expressed substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The
auditor stated that the Company has experienced recurring losses
from operations, has negative operating cash flows during the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017, has an accumulated deficit of $41,996,598 as
of Dec. 31, 2017 and is dependent on its ability to raise capital.
These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern.


GREENHILL & CO: S&P Rates $360MM 1st-Lien Term Loan 'BB'
--------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB' debt issue rating on Greenhill
& Co. Inc.'s proposed $360 million first-lien term loan due April
2024. Greenhill will use the proceeds to refinance its existing
$350 million first-lien term loan due 2022, which has an amortized
balance of $320 million. The recovery rating is '3', indicating
S&P's expectation for meaningful recovery (60%) in a hypothetical
default. The new loan is expected to have terms similar to the
existing loan. The net proceeds will be used for general corporate
purposes, which will likely include additional share repurchases.

As of December 2018, Greenhill had $320 million in gross debt from
which S&P deducts $131 million of surplus cash and add $40 million
of operating lease liabilities to arrive at its $229 million
adjusted debt balance. With $137 million in adjusted EBITDA, debt
to EBITDA fell to 1.65x at the end of 2018 from 2.3x at December
2017. Inside the $137 million of EBITDA, S&P Global Ratings
includes $38 million of stock compensation addbacks and $16 million
of operating lease addbacks.    

S&P's stable outlook reflects its view that Greenhill will operate
with net debt to adjusted EBITDA between 2.0x and 3.0x with
interest coverage above 6x over the next 18-24 months. The outlook
also incorporates its expectation that the company will deploy its
surplus cash judiciously for stock buybacks.


HIGHLAND SALONS: Authorized to Use Cash Collateral Until Aug. 31
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. David R. Jones of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas has authorized Highland Salons, Ltd., to
use cash collateral in accordance with the terms and conditions
contained in the Agreed Cash Collateral Order.

The Debtor and Compass Bank have represented to the Court that they
have negotiated in good faith and have agreed in good faith to the
terms and conditions of the Agreed Cash Collateral Order.

The Debtor may use cash collateral provided that such use will not
exceed the cumulative total amount by more than 20%, or as such
total amount may be modified in writing with the prior written
consent of Compass Bank. In the event that Compass Bank objects to
continued use of Cash Collateral subsequent to Sept. 1, 2019, the
Bank will provide written notice to the Debtor that it no longer
consents to the use of Cash Collateral. Otherwise, the Debtor's
authority to use cash collateral will terminate on Aug. 31, 2019,
unless the Court authorizes further use of cash collateral.

As adequate protection, the Debtor grants Compass Bank, effective
as of the Petition Date, valid and automatically perfected
replacement liens and security interests in and upon all new
accounts, contract rights, general intangibles, furniture, fixtures
and equipment and all other property of the Debtors excluding
avoidance actions, as further security for the use of the Cash
Collateral.

Notwithstanding the granting of replacement liens to Compass Bank,
all such liens will be subordinate to any existing, non-avoidable
perfected liens of other creditors to the extent that any such
liens existed on Feb. 1, 2019, administrative claims allowed
pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 330 to the extent provided for by the
Budget, and quarterly fees owed to the United States Trustee
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1930(a)(6).

As further adequate protection, the Debtor will pay $5,000 to
Compass Bank on or before the 15th day of each month of the term of
the Order, and Compass Bank will be entitled to apply such payment
to its secured claim to the extend allowed in this bankruptcy
case.

Moreover, the Debtor will continue to (1) maintain, with
financially sound and reputable insurance companies, insurance of
the kind, covering the Pre-Petition Collateral and in accordance
with the Pre-Petition Indebtedness Documents, including without
limitation insurance covering the Pre-Petition Collateral and
post-petition assets; (2) make any and all payments necessary to
keep the Pre-Petition Collateral and its other property, in good
repair and condition and not permit or commit any waste thereof;
and (3) maintain all of the Pre-Petition Collateral, and other
property in good condition and repair, not commit any waste
thereof.

A copy of the Agreed Cash Collateral Order is available at

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb19-30540-16.pdf

                   About Highland Salons LP

Highland Salons, LP is a full-service salon specializing in hair,
nails, massage and esthetics.  It also offers a menu of
personalized skin therapies, body treatments, massage, anti-aging
facials and customized packages.

Highland Salons sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 19-30540) on Feb. 1,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $3,553,410
in assets and $1,019,255 in liabilities.  The case is assigned to
Judge David R. Jones.  The Debtor tapped Law Office of Peter
Johnson as its legal counsel.  No official committee of unsecured
creditors has been appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


HOOK AND BOIL: U.S. Trustee Objects to Plan Confirmation
--------------------------------------------------------
David W. Asbach, Acting United States Trustee for Region 5, objects
to confirmation of the First Amended Plan of Hook and Boil, LLC.

The UST complains that there is not sufficient information on the
lease/sale of equipment with Falcon Leasing.

The UST's objection to the prior Plan and Disclosure Statement
said, "In order to evaluate the contribution made by Mr. Alleman,
the Proposed Plan should set forth in detail the money loaned to
the debtor and the time period over which it was loaned."

The UST points out that the Proposed Plan does not appear to be
feasible, the MOR summary in the plan has the wrong net income for
August and September. The UST further points out that the correct
average monthly cash flow is $2,263, monthly plan/lease payments
total $5,108, so the debtor's average monthly cash flow is less
than one-half the amount needed and is $2,845 short of the required
monthly plan payments.

                    About Hook and Boil

Hook and Boil, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. La.
Case No. 18-50798) on June 28, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Mark Alleman, manager/member, the Debtor estimated assets in the
range of $100,001 to $500,000 and debt of $500,001 to $1 million.
The Debtor tapped William C. Vidrine, Esq., at Vidrine & Vidrine,
as counsel.


ICONIX BRAND: Reports $69.1 Million Net Loss for Fourth Quarter
---------------------------------------------------------------
Iconix Brand Group, Inc. reported financial results for the fourth
quarter and full year ended Dec. 31, 2018.

Bob Galvin, CEO commented, "We have finalized our review of
business and operational goals and objectives and we have put our
plan into effect.  As a result, we have reduced our operational
cost structure by approximately $30 million to align with our plan.
On the business front, the quarter was negatively impacted by the
Sears bankruptcy, while our international business continued to
demonstrate strong growth.  We continue to build the pipeline of
our future business, as we have signed 83 deals over the last six
months for aggregate guaranteed minimum royalties of approximately
$45 million."

For the fourth quarter of 2018, total revenue was $42.7 million, a
18% decline as compared to $52.3 million in the prior year quarter.
For the full year 2018, total revenue was $187.7 million, a 17%
decline as compared to $225.8 million in the full year 2017.  Such
decline was expected, principally as a result of the transition of
the Company's Danskin, OP and Mossimo direct to retail licenses in
our Womens segment, as previously announced.  The Company's revenue
for the fourth quarter of 2018 and the full year 2018 were also
impacted by the effect of the Sears bankruptcy on the Company's Joe
Boxer & Bongo brands in Womens and the Cannon brand in Home.  The
Company's Mens segment revenue increased 38% in the fourth quarter
of 2018 as compared to the prior year quarter primarily from the
Umbro, Ecko and Buffalo brands although the Mens segment declined
2% for 2018 mostly as a result of the transition of the Starter
brand from Walmart to Amazon.  The Company's International segment
grew for both the quarter and the year primarily based on the
performance of its brands in China, Europe and India.

In the first quarter of 2018, the Company adopted a new revenue
recognition accounting standard (ASU No. 2014-09 Revenue from
Contracts with Customers – Topic 606).  Adoption of this standard
increased the fourth quarter of 2018 revenue by approximately $2.3
million and increased revenue for the full year 2018 by
approximately $3.9 million.

SG&A Expenses:

Total SG&A expenses in the fourth quarter of 2018 were $29.0
million, a 29% decrease compared to $40.9 million in the fourth
quarter of 2017.  Most of the decline for the quarter was a
decrease in compensation, advertising and professional expenses.

Total SG&A expenses in the full year 2018 were $121.4 million, a 6%
increase compared to $114.6 million in the full year 2017.
Included in these expenses was an $8.2 million bad debt expense as
a result of the Sears bankruptcy filing.  Excluding the bad debt
expense related to the Sears bankruptcy, SG&A expenses decreased 1%
year over year.

Trademark, Goodwill and Investment Impairment:

In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded a non-cash
trademark impairment charge of $58.7 million, primarily in the
Womens segment related to the write-down in the Mossimo, Joe Boxer
and Mudd trademarks, to reduce various trademarks in those segments
to fair value.  The Company also recorded a non-cash investment
impairment charge of $2.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2018 due
to impairment of the Company's investment in iBrands.

For the full year 2018, the Company recorded a non-cash trademark
impairment charge of $136.4 million primarily in the Womens
segment, which was primarily related to the Mossimo, Joe Boxer and
Mudd brands.  The Company also recorded a non-cash goodwill
impairment charge of $37.8 million in the full year 2018 due to
impairment of goodwill in the Womens segment.

Operating Income and Adjusted EBITDA (1):


Operating loss for the fourth quarter of 2018 was $52.1 million, as
compared to operating loss of $18.3 million in the fourth quarter
of 2017.  Adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter of 2018 was $11.9
million which represents operating loss of $52.1 million excluding
trademark and investment impairments of $61.2 million and other net
charges of $2.8 million.  Adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter of
2017 was $18.9 million which represents operating loss of $18.3
million excluding trademark and investment impairments of $28.5
million and other net charges of $8.7 million.

Operating loss for the full year 2018 was $119.0 million, as
compared to operating loss of $564.7 million in the full year 2017.
Adjusted EBITDA in the full year 2018 was $74.6 million which
represents operating loss of $119.0 million excluding goodwill,
trademark and investment impairments of $176.7 million and other
net charges of $16.9 million.  Adjusted EBITDA in the full year
2017 was $117.7 million which represents operating loss of $564.7
million excluding goodwill, trademark and investment impairments of
$654.0 million and other net charges of $28.3 million.

Interest Expense, Other Income and Loss on extinguishment of debt:

Interest expense in the fourth quarter of 2018 was $14.9 million,
as compared to interest expense of $21.8 million in the fourth
quarter of 2017.  In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company
recognized a $7.2 million gain resulting from the Company's
accounting for the 5.75% Convertible Notes which requires recording
the fair value of this debt at the end of each period with any
change from the prior period accounted for as other income or loss
in the current period's income statement.

Interest expense in the full year 2018 was $59.2 million, as
compared to interest expense of $67.9 million in the full year
2017. In the full year 2018, the Company recognized a $81.0 million
gain resulting from the Company's accounting for the 5.75%
Convertible Notes which requires recording the fair value of this
debt at the end of each period with any change from the prior
period accounting for as other income or loss in the current
period's income statement. Additionally, in the full year 2018, the
Company acquired an additional 5% interest in its Iconix Australia
joint venture and as a result, recognized a $8.4 million pre-tax
non-cash gain on the remeasurement of the Company's initial
investment.  In the full year 2018, the Company recognized a $1.0
million gain, as compared to a gain of $2.7 million in the full
year 2017, each related to payments received from the sale of its
minority interest in Complex Media in 2016.

In the full year 2018, the Company recognized a gain on
extinguishment of debt of $4.5 million related to the early
extinguishment of a portion of the Company's 1.50% Convertible
Notes due 2018 as compared to a loss of $20.9 million in the full
year 2017 related to the early extinguishment of a portion of the
Company's term loan and the repurchase of a portion of the
Company's 1.50% Convertible Notes due 2018.

Provision for Income Taxes:

The effective income tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2018 is
approximately -11.1% which resulted in a $6.7 million income tax
provision, as compared to an effective income tax rate of 165.5% in
the prior year quarter which resulted in a $66.8 million income tax
benefit.  The effective income tax rate for the full year 2018 is
approximately -7.9% which resulted in a $6.5 million income tax
provision, as compared to an effective income tax rate for the full
year 2017 of 14.7% which resulted in a $96.0 million income tax
benefit.

The decrease in the effective tax rate for both the fourth quarter
and the full year is primarily a result of foreign tax expense
calculated in local jurisdictions where there are no net operating
losses available to offset the current tax liabilities, partially
offset by a tax benefit resulting from the tax impact of impairment
expenses recorded on indefinite lived intangible assets.

GAAP Net Income and GAAP Diluted EPS:

GAAP net loss from continuing operations attributable to Iconix for
the fourth quarter of 2018 reflects a loss of $69.1 million as
compared to income of $24.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2017.
GAAP diluted EPS from continuing operations for the fourth quarter
of 2018 reflects a loss of $9.75 as compared to income of $3.97 for
the fourth quarter of 2017.

GAAP net loss from continuing operations attributable to Iconix for
the full year 2018 reflects a loss of $100.5 million as compared to
a loss of $535.3 million for the full year 2017.  GAAP diluted EPS
from continuing operations for the full year 2018 reflects a loss
of $15.73 as compared to a loss of $94.71 for the full year 2017.

Reverse Stock Split: On March 14, 2019, the Company effected a
1-for-10 reverse stock split of its common stock.  No fractional
shares were issued in connection with the Reverse Stock Split.
Stockholders who otherwise would have been entitled to receive
fractional shares of common stock had their holdings rounded up to
the next whole share.  All share and per share amounts in this
press release have been adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock
Split.

2019 Guidance:

  * Full year revenue guidance of $145 million - $160 million.

  * GAAP operating income guidance of $73 million - $83 million.

  * Full year adjusted EBITDA guidance of approximately $70 million

    - $80 million.

A full-text copy of the press release is available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/McBBbE

                     About Iconix Brand

Broadway, New York-based Iconix Brand Group, Inc. --
http://www.iconixbrand.com/-- is a brand management company and
owner of a diversified portfolio of over 30 global consumer brands
across the women's, men's, entertainment, home and international
segments.  The Company's business strategy is to maximize the value
of its brands primarily through strategic licenses and joint
venture partnerships around the world, as well as to grow the
portfolio of brands through strategic acquisitions.  Iconix Brand
owns, licenses and markets a portfolio of consumer brands
including: Candie's, Bongo, Joe Boxer, Rampage, Mudd, London Fog,
Mossimo, Ocean Pacific/OP, Danskin/Danskin Now, Rocawear/Roc
Nation, Cannon, Royal Velvet, Fieldcrest, Charisma, Starter,
Waverly, Ecko Unltd/Mark Ecko Cut & Sew, Zoo York, Umbro, Lee
Cooper, and Artful Dodger; and interests in Material Girl, Ed
Hardy, Truth or Dare, Modern Amusement, Buffalo, Hydraulic, and
PONY brands.  The Company licenses its brands to a network of
retailers and manufacturers.

Iconix Brand incurred a net loss attributable to the Company of
$489.3 million in 2017, a net loss attributable to the Company of
$252.1 million in 2016, and a net loss attributable to the Company
of $186.5 million in 2015.  As of Sept. 30, 2018, the Company had
$711.3 million in total assets, $751.6 million in total
liabilities, $34.64 million in redeemable non-controlling interest,
and a total stockholders' deficit of $74.90 million.

The Company stated in its 2017 Annual Report that due to certain
developments, including the decision by Target Corporation not to
renew the existing Mossimo license agreement following its
expiration in October 2018 and by Walmart, Inc., not to renew the
existing Danskin Now license agreement following its expiration in
January 2019, and the Company's revised forecasted future earnings,
the Company forecasted that it would unlikely be in compliance with
certain of its financial debt covenants in 2018 and that it may
otherwise face possible liquidity challenges in 2018.  The Company
said these factors raised substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.  The Company's ability to continue as
a going concern is dependent on its ability to raise additional
capital and implement its business plan.


INSTALLED BUILDING: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms BB- ICR
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on Installed Building
Products Inc. to stable from positive, and affirmed all ratings,
including its 'BB-' issuer credit rating and 'BB' senior secured
term loan rating.

Despite the company's good 2018 operating performance, the outlook
revision reflects diminished prospects for a near-term upgrade
because of higher-than-expected adjusted debt leverage and
uncertainty surrounding the potential effect of slowing U.S.
residential construction. Leverage reduction has been slower than
anticipated, with S&P-calculated debt to EBITDA at about 3x in 2018
compared to S&P's previous expectation that adjusted leverage would
decline to below 2.5x. S&P attributes the deviation primarily to
incremental debt to support acquisitions and growth,
higher-than-expected material costs that limited EBITDA margin
improvement, and stock repurchases.  The stable outlook reflects
S&P's forecast that IBP will successfully integrate its recent
acquisitions and grow revenues by about 12% in 2019, reduce
adjusted debt leverage to about 2.6x, and maintain its adjusted
EBITDA margin at about 13% as it mitigates high material costs and
low-unemployment wage pressures with good cost management and
business practices.

S&P could lower its ratings if operating performance declines
because of operating missteps or high financial risk and leverage
tolerance causes IBP's adjusted leverage to rise and stay above 3x,
or if a steep downturn in housing starts causes S&P to forecast
IBP's adjusted leverage to stay above 3x for a prolonged period.
S&P would consider an upgrade if it expects adjusted leverage
reduction to decline and stay below 2x and forecast free operating
cash flow (FOCF) to debt above 20%. In this scenario, S&P would
expect residential construction growth, coupled with conservative
financial policy decisions including limited debt-funded
acquisitions and share repurchases. S&P would also consider an
upgrade if product or service diversification reduces IBP's
meaningful exposure to the cyclical single-family construction and
home insulation market.


JSS OF ALBUQUERQUE: Ct. Endorses Dismissal of NM Appeal as Moot
---------------------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing recommends that the appeals case
captioned State of New Mexico, Appellant, v. JSS of Albuquerque,
LLC, Appellee, No. 1:17-cv-00875-JCH-LF (D.N.M.) be dismissed.

This matter came before the Court on the parties' briefing
regarding whether the bankruptcy appeal is moot. Following a status
conference on Sept. 14, 2018, the Court ordered the parties to
brief the issue of whether the appeal is moot in light of the
settlement of the underlying bankruptcy case. The parties submitted
simultaneous briefs on the issue on Oct. 26, 2018. The Honorable
Judith C. Herrera referred this case the district court "to conduct
hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to
perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an
ultimate disposition of the case."  

This case arises from an enforcement action filed in the Second
Judicial District Court, Bernalillo County, New Mexico in December
2016. The State of New Mexico alleged that JSS of Albuquerque, LLC
and its principals had violated various New Mexico consumer
protection laws. In that enforcement action, the State sought
injunctive relief, statutory penalties, and restitution as
authorized by statute. JSS responded by filing a petition for
relief in the Bankruptcy Court under chapter 11 and taking
advantage of the automatic stay imposed by 11 U.S.C. section 362.
The State took the position that enforcing its consumer protection
laws was a police and regulatory matter not subject to the
automatic stay. Nevertheless, the Second Judicial District Court
requested that the State obtain an order from the Bankruptcy Court
to assure the state court that it was not violating the federal law
by proceeding. The State then sought a determination from the
Bankruptcy Court as to whether the state court proceeding was
stayed. On August 1, 2017, Chief Bankruptcy Judge Robert Jacobvitz
issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order holding that the exception to
the automatic stay did not encompass the fixing of the State's
statutory restitution remedy, and he granted the State's motion
only in part.

The State timely appealed this decision on August 25, 2017 and
elected to have the appeal heard by the District Court rather than
by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.

In August of 2018, it came to the Court's attention that the
parties in the underlying bankruptcy case had reached a mutually
agreeable settlement. The Court ordered the parties to provide the
Court with a joint status report, and the Court set a status
conference. At the status conference on Sept. 14, 2018, the parties
advised the Court that the underlying bankruptcy case had settled
and "implementation of the settlement is imminent." The parties
agreed that the settlement of the bankruptcy case would result in
dismissal with prejudice of the chapter 11 bankruptcy and
termination of the automatic stay, as well as resolution of the
pending state court case. Accordingly, the Court ordered briefing
on whether the termination of the underlying bankruptcy and state
court case rendered this appeal moot. The parties filed their
simultaneous briefing on the issue on Oct. 26, 2018, Docs. 16, 17,
and again JSS took no position on either the appeal or the mootness
question. On Dec. 13, 2018, the Bankruptcy Court notified this
Court that it had dismissed the underlying bankruptcy case on Oct.
26, 2018.

The Court holds that there is no question that the settlement of
both the underlying state case and the bankruptcy case has rendered
this case moot. The State appealed the partial stay imposed by the
Bankruptcy Court on its enforcement action in the state court. The
dismissal of the bankruptcy case lifted the stay, and the state
case is proceeding toward a final judgment which provides for JSS's
payment of civil penalties and restitution. Thus, this Court cannot
provide any relief to the State by deciding the appeal. Instead,
the State argues that the "capable of repetition, yet evading
review" exception applies.

The State provides no basis for this Court to conclude that there
is a reasonable expectation that the State's future enforcement
actions seeking monetary penalties and restitution will be brought
before the Bankruptcy Court, and that the Bankruptcy Court will
impose partial stays in those cases over the State's objection.
Even if some future cases are brought before the Bankruptcy Court,
there is no reason to expect that they will settle before the
district court has the opportunity to decide an appeal of a partial
stay order. Because the State has not established that the "capable
of repetition, yet evading review" exception applies under these
circumstances, and because the State does not argue that any other
exception applies, this case is moot. This Court does not have
jurisdiction to act in this matter.

The mootness also results from the State's voluntary participation
in a settlement. Accordingly, the State has voluntarily forfeited
its legal remedy and surrendered its claim to vacatur. In these
circumstances, the Court should not vacate the bankruptcy judge's
decision.

For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that the appeal is moot,
and no exception to the mootness doctrine applies. The Court,
therefore, does not have jurisdiction to decide the merits of this
appeal. The Court further finds that the State has not established
that it is entitled to the equitable remedy of vacatur. The Court,
therefore, recommends that the State's appeal be dismissed, and
that the Court take no further action.

A copy of the Court's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
dated Feb. 1, 2019 is available at https://bit.ly/2WmSoJp from
Leagle.com.

State of New Mexico, Appellant, represented by James C. Jacobsen,
NM Attorney General's Office.

JSS of Albuquerque, LLC, Appellee, represented by Michael K.
Daniels, Michael K Daniels Esq.

                  About JSS of Albuquerque

JSS of Albuquerque, LLC filed a voluntary Chapter 11 Petition
(Bankr. D.N.M. Case No. 17-10092) on January 18, 2017, disclosing
assets and liabilities ranging from $100,000 to $500,000. The
petition was signed by Jesus Cano, managing member. The Debtor is
represented by Michael K. Daniels, Esq.


JUDY JAN DAVIS: Seeks to Hire Eric A. Liepins as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judy Jan Davis Simmons Revocable Trust seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas to hire Eric A.
Liepins, P.C., as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its duties under the Bankruptcy
Code and will provide other legal services in connection with its
Chapter 11 case.

The firm will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Eric Liepins, Esq.                   $275
     Paralegals/Legal Assistants        $30 - $50

Liepins received a retainer of $5,000, plus the filing fee.

The firm does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor's
bankruptcy estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
     Eric A. Liepins, P.C.
     12770 Coit Road, Suite 1100
     Dallas, TX 75251
     Telephone: (972) 991-5591
     Facsimile: (972) 991-5788
     Email: eric@ealpc.com

           About Judy Jan Davis Simmons Revocable Trust

Judy Jan Davis Simmons Revocable Trust sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No.
19-40951) on March 4, 2019.  The case is assigned to Judge Mark X.
Mullin.  Eric A. Liepins, P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.



KEANE GROUP: S&P Affirms 'B+' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B+' issuer credit rating on Keane
Group Inc., a Texas-based provider of onshore oilfield services. At
the same time, S&P affirmed its 'BB-' issue-level rating on the
company's $350 million senior secured term loan due 2025.

The affirmation incorporates S&P's assessment of Keane's business
risk profile, which reflects its participation in the highly
cyclical U.S. oilfield services sector, its moderate size, and the
limited diversity of its services. Keane is a pure-play provider of
well completion services that primarily offers hydraulic fracturing
(or fracking), wireline, and cementing services. The demand for
these services is driven by oil and gas producers' capital spending
levels, which are--in turn--determined by crude oil and natural gas
prices. Therefore, the demand for well completion services can be
highly volatile across the commodity price cycle, which leads to
swings in the company's profitability and leverage metrics.

The stable outlook on Keane reflects S&P's expectation that the
company will maintain leverage of less than 1.5x and FFO to debt of
more than 60% over the next two years supported by the relatively
high utilization rate of its hydraulic fracturing fleet, which S&P
expects to improve throughout the year.

S&P could lower its rating on Keane if it expects the company's FFO
to debt to average below 45% for a sustained period without a clear
path for improvement. This would most likely occur if weak
commodity prices lead to cutbacks in exploration and production
(E&P) spending and completion activity, which would reduce the
demand for the company's services.

S&P could raise its rating on Keane if it believes that the company
has improved its business risk profile, most likely by increasing
its scale and improving the diversity of its offerings beyond well
completion services while maintaining FFO to debt of at least 30%.


LGI HOMES: S&P Affirms 'BB-' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its ratings, including the 'BB-' issuer
credit rating, on U.S.-based, LGI Homes Inc. (LGIH). The rating
agency expects LGIH has enough flexibility to slow land spending to
ensure available liquidity to fund the maturity of Nov. 2019
convertible notes, which could also be repaid with equity.

Higher inventory investments were a byproduct of LGIH's business
model--being a high-growth, high-turnover homebuilder. This, plus a
decline in the borrowing base due to seasonality in the business,
led to a reduction in the amount available on the company's
revolving credit facility. The decrease resulted in LGIH's
liquidity sources being just sufficient to cover its liquidity uses
over the next 12 months, and S&P revised the liquidity score
accordingly. However, S&P expects the business to continue to grow
-- albeit at a slower rate -- as the company has enough inventory
to support about 20% growth this year. A higher inventory balance
will result in a higher borrowing base, and pursuant to the terms
of the credit agreement, the maturity of the convertible notes will
also add to the availability of the credit facility. As of Dec. 31,
2018, there was about $26.8 million of availability on its $500
million unsecured credit facility, and S&P expects the company to
fund the principal amount of its convertible notes with cash when
due in November 2019, and pay the resultant premium (if any) in
equity.  

The stable outlook on LGIH reflects S&P's expectation of continued
earnings growth supported by the rating agency's outlook for U.S.
housing demand to remain fundamentally strong, with its estimates
of 1.3 million units of housing starts in 2019. S&P believes LGIH
will continue to achieve its growth objectives and expand into
additional markets while maintaining gross margins in the 25% to
26% range through 2019, and debt to EBITDA of about 2.5x by the end
of 2019.

S&P could lower the rating over the next 12 months if there were a
prolonged economic slowdown in key markets such as Texas, causing
its forecast EBITDA to fall in excess of 30%. It could also lower
the rating if the company financed a large acquisition or land
purchases at levels greater than the rating agency's base case,
causing debt to EBITDA to rise above 4x or debt to capital to
exceed 50% on a sustained basis.

Despite its expectations of improving credit measures over the next
12 months, S&P views an upgrade as unlikely due to its relatively
small revenue base and limited product and geographic diversity.
However, S&P could raise the rating if the company exceeded the
rating agency's growth targets, such that revenue approached $3
billion and debt to EBITDA remained in the 2x-3x range, which the
rating agency believes will take a couple of years. This could
occur if gross margins increased in excess of 300 basis points due
to stronger demand and higher selling prices.


LITCHFIELD LASER: Unsecureds to Get 10% Dividend in 103 Months
--------------------------------------------------------------
Litchfield Laser Skin Care, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 Plan and
accompanying Disclosure Statement.

Class H - General Unsecured Claims are impaired. This class shall
receive a dividend of 10% of their claims by means of monthly
installment payments beginning on the Effective Date within 103
months from the Effective Date. The Debtor projects that such
payments will begin on October 1, 2019. Accordingly, the Debtor
will make payments to this class in the aggregate amount of $807.29
per month, from October 1, 2019 through May 1, 2028. Monthly
payments to individual unsecured creditors in this class are set
forth on Exhibit B.

Class A are impaired and consists of the allowed secured claim of
Direct Capital a Division of CIT Bank, N.A., which is secured by a
lien on the Debtor's personal property. The amount of Direct
Capital's total claim is $156,700.71. The Debtor projects that such
payments will begin on October 1, 2019. Accordingly, the Debtor
will make payments to this class in the amount of $289.52 per
month, from October 1, 2019 through May 1, 2028. The Debtor may
elect to pay off this class in full at any time after the Effective
Date, with a corresponding abatement of interest.

Class B consists of the allowed secured claim of LCA Bank
Corporation, which is secured by a lien on the Debtor's personal
property, as reflected in amended Claim # 3-2. The amount of LCA's
total claim is $81,522.22, which is bifurcated into a secured
component of $27,500.00 and an unsecured component in the amount of
$54,022.22. The unsecured component of LCA's claim is treated as a
Class H general unsecured claim. The Debtor projects that such
payments will begin on October 1, 2019. Accordingly, the Debtor
will make payments to this class in the amount of $271.44 per
month, from October 1, 2019 through May 1, 2028.

Class C are impaired and consists of the allowed secured claim of
Newtown Savings Bank. The amount of Newtown SB's total claim is
$25,145.32. Newtown SB's claim is based upon a Business Revolving
Line of Credit Convertible To Term Loan Promissory Note in the
original principal amount of $25,000.00 dated February 17, 2017.
Accordingly, the Debtor believes that the allowed secured claim of
Newtown SB in this class has no value. The Debtor will file a
motion to determine that the secured status of Newtown SB's claim
is zero, within 30 days of the date of the approval of this
Disclosure Statement. The Plan therefore proposes that Newtown SB's
claim in its entirety shall be treated as a general unsecured claim
(Class H).

Class D consists of the allowed secured claim of CIT Bank N.A. CIT
acquired this claim by means of a Notice of Assignment from Navitas
Credit Corp.  While referencing a 2016 Excel HR Laser System, CIT
characterizes this claim as a completely unsecured "lease
deficiency" in the amount, and that it is partially secured. The
Debtor projects that such payments will begin on October 1, 2019.
Accordingly, the Debtor will make payments to this class in the
amount of $271.81 per month, from October 1, 2019 through May 1,
2028.  The Debtor may elect to pay off this class in full at any
time after the Effective Date, with a corresponding abatement of
interest.  The balance of CIT's claim, totaling $78,097.91, shall
be treated as a general unsecured claim (Class H).

Class E are impaired and consists of another allowed secured claim
of CIT Bank N.A. CIT acquired this claim by means of a Notice of
Assignment from Ascentium Capital, LLC.  As with its Class D claim,
CIT characterizes this claim as a completely unsecured "lease
deficiency" in the amount of $168,239.57, with respect to a
Sculpsure Laser System. The Debtor believes, however, that CIT's
claim is based on a purchase and sale agreement, not a lease, and
that it is partially secured. CIT shall receive the value of its
secured claim by means of the surrender of its collateral, and
shall retain the lien on its collateral for the full amount of its
secured claim. The balance of CIT's claim, totaling $138,239.57,
shall be treated as a general unsecured claim (Class H).

Class F are impaired and consists of the allowed secured claim of
Ascentium Capital LLC which is secured by a lien on the Debtor's
personal property.  The amount of Ascentium's total claim is
$243,569.24, which shall be bifurcated into a secured component of
$37,500.00 (the value of Ascentium's collateral) and an unsecured
component in the amount of $206,069.24. The unsecured component of
Ascentium’s claim is treated as a Class H general unsecured
claim. The Debtor projects that such payments will begin on October
1, 2019. Accordingly, the Debtor will make payments to this class
in the amount of $333.16 per month, from October 1, 2019 through
May 1, 2028.

Class G consists of the allowed secured claim of Financial Pacific
Leasing, Inc. which is secured by a lien on the Debtor's personal
property.  The amount of Financial Pacific's total claim is
$71,645.27. Financial Pacific shall receive the value of its
secured claim (zero) over the course of the Plan, and shall retain
the lien on its collateral for the full amount of its secured
claim. The entirety of Financial Pacific's claim, totaling
$71,645.27, shall be treated as a general unsecured claim (Class
H).

The Debtor shall fund this Plan with its business revenue.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 20, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y3u4s2omfrom PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

             About Litchfield Laser Skin Care

Litchfield Laser Skin Care, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 18-50661) on May
25, 2018.  In the petition signed by Dr. Elizabeth Galan, owner,
the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of
$1 million.


LONESTAR II: Moody's Assigns Ba3 Ratings to $300 Secured Loans
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned Ba3 ratings to Lonestar II
Generation Holdings LLC's $250 million senior secured term loan B
due 2026, the $30 million senior secured term Loan C due 2026 and
the $20 million revolving credit facility due 2024. The rating
outlook is stable.

Proceeds from the senior secured term loan B will be used to pay a
$240 million distribution to the sponsor and to pay transaction
related costs. The term loan C will be used as collateral for
letters of credit and the revolving credit facility for working
capital financing and general corporate purposes.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba3 rating balances the hedges in place that guarantee a hedged
margin of around $163 million in 2019 and 2020 on a combined basis
against the merchant nature of the portfolio of three generating
facilities and the high volatility of electricity prices in
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT). The portfolio's
operating revenue, and thus its ability to service its debt over
the long-term, is highly reliant on on-/off-peak and scarcity
pricing during summer months when it generates the majority of its
energy margin.

Lonestar II Generation Holdings entered into hedges for Bastrop and
Twin Oaks for realization in 2019 and 2020. Hedges in place
guarantee a hedged margin of around $84 million in 2019 and $78
million in 2020. Existing hedges will support Lonestar in covering
its fixed charges should market prices turn out to be lower than
expected. It is management's intention to roll-over hedges on a
2-year basis. However, the terms and conditions of the term loan do
not include minimum hedging requirements after 2020.

Recent coal retirements and a tighter reserve margin have supported
improved pricing in 2018 and forward curves indicate the potential
for continued high on-peak power prices in particular during the
summer months. However, Moody's cautions that power prices in ERCOT
remain subject to high volatility, are highly dependent on summer
temperatures and are therefore, difficult to predict. Overall,
Lonestar II Generation Holdings generated pro forma EBITDA of
around $71 million in 2018.

Moody's expects Lonestar II Generation Holdings to achieve strong
debt service coverage ratios (DSCRs) of close to 4.0x and project
cash flow from operations to debt of around 30% over the next three
years 2019-2021. However, this performance assumes that Lonestar
can generate EBITDA of close to $100 million in 2019 and 2020
before dropping in 2021 to similar levels than achieved in 2018.
While this projected financial performance is indicative of a
higher credit profile, the Ba3 rating factors the potential
volatility in performance and the uncertainty associated with the
issuer being able to achieve these results on a sustained basis. A
100% cash flow sweep requirement should support deleveraging from
the manageable leverage at closing of 3.5x debt/EBITDA based on
2018 EBITDA. Moody's notes that its sensitivity case is materially
weaker than management's expectation beginning in year 2021 once
the existing hedges expire but does not assume that energy margins
would decline to levels experienced in 2016 and 2017.

Other factors considered in the rating are (1) the good quality of
the three assets with a solid operating track record; (2) the track
record of Blackstone, Kindle Energy LLC and NAES in managing and
operating the portfolio; (3) typical project finance features of
the transaction, albeit there is no financial covenant applicable
to the term loan; (4) and environmental risks associated with the
Twin Oaks coal plant and adjacent coal mine, which is in compliance
with all existing environmental regulations.

Liquidity Profile

The liquidity profile is adequate. Lonestar II Generation Holdings
will benefit from access to a $20 million 5-year revolving credit
facility and a 7-year $30 million term loan C. Lenders will also
benefit from a 6-month debt service reserve fund, backed by a
letter of credit under the term loan C. The existing hedges do not
include any collateral requirements, which is positive.

Rating Outlook

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the
2019 and 2020 hedges in place will generate cash flow sufficient to
cover Lonestar's fixed costs including debt service and will allow
for solid credit metrics with DSCR at least above 2.0x and solid
generation of project cash flow from operations.

Factors that could lead to an upgrade

  - DSCR of around 3.0x on a sustained basis even after the current
hedges expire in 2020

  - Cash from operations to debt above 20% on a sustained basis
after the current hedges expire in 2020

Factors that could lead to a downgrade

  - DSCR below 2.0x

  - Cash from operations to debt below 10%

  - Major operational issues at either one of the three assets

PROFILE

Lonestar II Generation Holdings LLC owns a portfolio of three
generating assets in Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT)
with a combined capacity of 1,108 megawatts (MW). Funds owned by
Blackstone originally acquired these assets in 2014. The three
generating assets are: (1) 552 MW Bastrop combined cycle gas
turbines (CCGT) baseload facility just outside of Austin, Texas,
located in ERCOT South; (2) 248 MW Paris natural gas-fired CCGT
facility in Paris, Texas, located in ERCOT North; (3) 308 MW Twin
Oaks lignite generating facility. Twin Oaks is located in Robertson
County between Dallas and Houston, in ERCOT North.


MAJOR EVENTS: To Pay PA Revenue Department in Full at 6% Interest
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Major Events Group LLC filed an amended disclosure statement
regarding its proposed chapter 11 plan of reorganization dated
March 19, 2019.

The latest filing provides additional information on the treatment
of the Internal Revenue Service 4-1, Claim 1, Pennsylvania
Department of Revenue in Class I. It states that Claim 1 is a
priority tax claim in the amount of $100 and will be paid with the
first administrative disbursement. Claim 1, Pennsylvania Department
of Revenue is also a tax claim with priority. The tax balance
resulted in a lien and the Department of Revenue has a secured
claim for this tax balance. $4,728.34, will be paid in full with 6%
interest from date of filing of the case.

A copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated March 19, 2019 is
available at http://tinyurl.com/yy4hffvufrom Pacermonitor.com at
no charge.

                  About Major Events Group

Major Events Group LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 18-11123) on Feb. 20,
2018. In the petition signed by Antoine Gardiner, president, the
Debtor disclosed that it had estimated assets of less than $50,000
and liabilities of less than $50,000.  Judge Eric L. Frank presides
over the case. The Debtor tapped Michael P. Kutzer, Esq., as its
legal counsel.


MAMMOET-STARNETH: Adds Confirmation Injunction Provision in Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Mammoet-Starneth, LLC, filed a modified second amended Chapter 11
plan of liquidation to add the following language:

     Pursuant to section 1141(d)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code,
confirmation of this Plan will not discharge the Debtor; provided,
however, that, upon confirmation of the Plan, the occurrence of the
Effective Date, and the distributions provided for under the Plan,
the holders of Claims and Equity Interests may not seek payment or
recourse against or otherwise be entitled to any distribution from
the Estate except as expressly provided in the Plan.

A redlined version of the Modified Second Amended Plan dated March
20, 2019, is available at http://tinyurl.com/y3t8ouwjfrom
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                   About Mammoet-Starneth

Mammoet-Starneth, LLC, a company based in Wilmington, Delaware,
designs and constructs giant observation wheels and structures.
Mammoet-Starneth sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 17-12925) on Dec. 13, 2017.  In the petition signed by manager
Christiaan Lavooij, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of
$100 million to $500 million.

Laurie Selber Silverstein is the case judge.

The Debtor tapped Sills Cummins & Gross P.C. as its lead counsel,
and Jason M. Madron, Esq., at Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., as
its co-counsel.  William Henrich, CRO, at Getzler Henrich &
Associates, LLC, serves as the Debtor's restructuring advisor.
Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy as its balloting agent.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case.


MANHATTAN JEEP: May 1 Plan Confirmation Hearing
-----------------------------------------------
The Disclosure Statement explaining Manhattan Jeep Chrysler Dodge,
Inc., et al.'s Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation is approved.

The Confirmation Hearing will commence at 10:00 a.m., (Prevailing
Eastern Time), on May 1, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable
Michael E. Wiles, United States Bankruptcy Judge, at the United
States Bankruptcy Court, One Bowling Green, Courtroom 617, New
York, NY 10004-1408.

All objections to confirmation of the Plan will be filed and served
no later than April 23, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. (Prevailing Eastern
Time).

The Debtors may file a consolidated reply to any timely-filed Plan
Objections no later than April 29, 2019 at 12:00 p.m. (prevailing
Eastern Time).

                   About Manhattan Jeep

Manhattan Jeep Chrysler Dodge, Inc., is a family-owned and operated
car dealer based in New York.  Manhattan Jeep offers a collection
of both new and used cars to customers in Manhattan, Queens, the
Bronx, and surrounding areas.  The Company also offers car
services
including oil changes and engine and transmission repairs.  It also
provides state inspections and free body shop estimates and sells
vehicle parts.  

Manhattan Jeep Chrysler Dodge, Inc., and Manhattan Automotive,
L.L.C., filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-10657 and
18-10661) on March 9, 2018.  In the petitions signed by Patrick
Monninger, president of Manhattan Jeep, Manhattan Jeep estimated $1
million to $10 million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in
liabilities and Manhattan Automotive estimated $500,000 to $1
million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.
The cases are assigned to Judge Michael E. Wiles.  Eric J. Snyder,
Esq., at Wilk Auslander LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


NOBLE REY: Adds Provision to Plan Implementation
------------------------------------------------
Noble Rey Brewing Co, LLC, filed a small business amended
disclosure statement describing its chapter 11 plan of
reorganization dated March 18, 2019.

This latest filing adds a provision to the implementation of the
plan stating that in the event of an auction, all net proceeds
after payment of the claims in Classes 1 through 4 above will go
60% to the Class 3 creditors and 40% to the Class 5 creditors.

A copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated March 18, 2019 is
available at http://tinyurl.com/yxenarzlfrom Pacermonitor.com at
no charge.

                    About Noble Rey Brewing Co.

Noble Rey Brewing Co., LLC, owns and operates a taproom offering
homemade beers, ciders & meads, other local brews & regular live
music.

Noble Rey Brewing Co., LLC, filed its Voluntary Petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Case No. 18-34214) on Dec. 19, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Chris Rigoulot, managing member, the Debtor estimated $50,000 in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  The Debtor's
counsel is Eric A. Liepins, P.C.


NOVAN INC: Incurs $12.7 Million Net Loss in 2018
------------------------------------------------
Novan, Inc. has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Annual Report on Form 10-K reporting a net loss and
comprehensive loss of $12.67 million on $5.99 million of total
revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss
and comprehensive loss of $36.62 million on $2.64 million of total
revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had $26.36 million in total
assets, $21.16 million in total liabilities, and $5.19 million in
total stockholders' equity.

BDO USA, LLP, in Raleigh, North Carolina, the Company's auditor
since 2018, issued a "going concern" opinion in its report dated
March 27, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and has not generated
significant revenue or positive cash flows from operations.  These
factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.

"Based on its current cash flow forecast, the Company does not
currently have sufficient cash resources to continue its business
operations beyond May 2019.  Therefore, the Company will need to
raise additional capital by May 2019 in order to continue to
operate its business beyond that time.  There can be no assurance
that the Company will be able to obtain additional capital on terms
acceptable to the Company, on a timely basis or at all.

"The failure of the Company to obtain sufficient funds on
acceptable terms could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business and cause the Company to alter or reduce its
planned operating activities, including but not limited to
delaying, reducing, terminating or eliminating planned product
candidate development activities, to conserve its cash and cash
equivalents.  The Company needs and intends to secure additional
capital from non-dilutive sources, including partnerships,
collaborations, licensing, grants or other strategic relationships,
or through equity or debt financings, which could result in
dilution.  Alternatively, the Company may seek to engage in one or
more potential transactions, such as the sale of the Company, or
sale or divestiture of some of its assets, but there can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to enter into such a
transaction or transactions on a timely basis or on terms that are
favorable to the Company.  Under these circumstances, the Company
may instead determine to dissolve and liquidate its assets or seek
protection under the bankruptcy laws. If the Company decides to
dissolve and liquidate its assets or to seek protection under the
bankruptcy laws, it is unclear to what extent the Company will be
able to pay its obligations, and, accordingly, it is further
unclear whether and to what extent any resources will be available
for distributions to stockholders," the Company stated in the SEC
filing.

Novan's report on Form 10-K is available from the SEC's website
at:

                      https://is.gd/PZ1ybZ

                         About Novan Inc.

Based in Morrisville, North Carolina, Novan Inc. --
http://www.novan.com/-- is a clinical-stage biotechnology company
focused on leveraging nitric oxide's natural antiviral and
immunomodulatory mechanisms of action to treat dermatological and
oncovirus-mediated diseases.  Nitric oxide plays a vital role in
the natural immune system response against microbial pathogens and
is a critical regulator of inflammation.  The Company's ability to
harness nitric oxide and its multiple mechanisms of action has
enabled it to create a platform with the potential to generate
differentiated product candidates.  The two key components of the
Company's nitric oxide platform are its proprietary Nitricil
technology, which drives the creation of new chemical entities, or
NCEs, and its topical formulation science, both of which the
Company uses to tune the Company's product candidates for specific
indications.


O'HARE FOUNDRY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: O'Hare Foundry Corporation
        3417 S. Big Bend Boulevard
        Saint Louis, MO 63143

Business Description: Established in 1921, O'Hare Foundry
                      Corporation -- http://www.oharefoundry.com
                      -- manufactures sand castings from brass,
                      brass & bronze alloys, and aluminum alloys.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 27, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis)

Case No.: 19-41834

Judge: Hon. Charles E. Rendlen III

Debtor's Counsel: A. Thomas DeWoskin, Esq.
                  DANNA MCKITRICK, P.C.
                  7701 Forsyth, Suite 800
                  St. Louis, MO 63105
                  Tel: (314) 726-1000
                       (314) 889-7128
                  E-mail: edmoecf@dmfirm.com
                          tdewoskin@dmfirm.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Kyle Kolander, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/moeb19-41834.pdf


OAKLAND PARK: Shareholder Files Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Alice Marquez Revocable Trust, Dated July 23, 2015, filed a
Plan of Reorganization and accompanying disclosure statement for
Oakland Park Inn Inc.

Oakland Park Inn, Inc. has been the operating entity of a hotel
owned by Alice Marquez and later by the Alice Marquez Revocable
Trust, dated September 23, 2015.  The Plan Proponent was the
shareholder of the Debtor, but did not actively engage in any
operational decisions for years.

Under the Plan, Class 5 - General Unsecured Creditors are impaired.
The holder of a Class 5 claim will be paid in part, in cash, upon
the later of the effective date of this Plan, as otherwise agreed
to by the holders of these claims and the Debtor, or the date on
which such claims are allowed by a Final Order is defined to have
accepted this Plan.  The Claims Register lists various amount due
from priority creditors, trade creditors, utilities and others, but
is unclear that all of these claims will be allowed since some are
disputed, some may have been paid and some are unliquidated. The
Plan Proponent believes that it is too early to determine the
allowed general unsecured claims in this class.

Class 6 - Equity Interest Holders of the Debtor are impaired. The
shares of the Debtor's stock shall be canceled and the Equity
Interest Holders will receive all of the stock in the reorganized
Debtor which is estimated to be 100 shares. Class 6 is deemed to
have rejected this Plan.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
following:

   1. The Plan Proponent will fund the Plan through the sale of the
Real Property owned and from other funds, as necessary.

   2. Funds held in the undersigned's trust account for
confirmation, to the extent necessary and available.

Under the Plan Proponent's Plan, the Debtor will cease operation
and the payments under the Plan will be made through the firm of
Moffa & Breuer, PLLC, as disbursing agent.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated  March 20, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y24bl4mhfrom PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Counsel for the Plan Proponent:

     John A. Moffa, Esq.
     Moffa & Breuer, PLLC
     1776 N Pine Island Rd., #102
     Plantation, FL 33322
     Tel: 954-634-4733
     Email: John@Moffa.Law

                    About Oakland Park Inn

Oakland Park Inn Inc. -- http://ramadaoaklandparkinn.com/-- owns
and operates the Ramada Oakland Park Inn located at 3001 N. Federal
Highway, Fort Lauderdale.  The Ramada branded hotel features
outdoor heated pool, business center, fitness center, tiki bar, and
restaurant.

Oakland Park Inn filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case
No. 19-10620) on Jan. 16, 2019.  In the petition signed by Walter
W. Johnson, Jr., authorized representative, the Debtor disclosed
$7,118 in assets and $3,187,752 in liabilities.

The Hon. John K. Olson oversees the case. Kevin C. Gleason, Esq.,
at Florida Bankruptcy Group, LLC, serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.

Soneet Kapila was appointed as Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor's
bankruptcy estate.


OAKLAND PHYSICIANS: M. Short Loses Partial Summary Judgment Bid
---------------------------------------------------------------
The matter captioned Basil T. Simon, not individually but solely in
his capacity as the Liquidation Trustee of Oakland Physicians
Medical Center, LLC, Liquidation Trust, Plaintiff, v. Michael
Short, Defendant, Adv. Proc. No. 16-05125 (Bankr. E.D. Mich.) is
before the Court after a Sept. 25 and 26, 2018 trial on the single
issue of whether pre-petition advances by defendant Michael Short
to debtor Oakland Physicians Medical Center, L.L.C., d/b/a Doctors'
Hospital of Michigan constitute capital contributions or debt.

After careful consideration of the facts presented, Bankruptcy
Judge Maria L. Oxholm finds that the two advances evidenced by
executed promissory notes--the July 1, 2011 note in the principal
amount of $100,000 and the Dec. 28, 2012 note in the principal
amount of $114,000--were loans. The remaining advances, aside from
the June 29, 2015 advance that was considered and decided in a
separate motion for partial summary judgment of Count II --
Preferential Transfers, were capital contributions.

The plaintiff Basil T. Simon, in his capacity as the liquidation
trustee of Debtor, filed the adversary proceeding to avoid
prepetition transfers from Debtor to Defendant. Specifically,
Plaintiff alleges the following counts in the adversary proceeding:
Count I - Claim for Re-Characterization of any Advances by
Defendant; Count II - Preferential Transfers; Count III -
Fraudulent Transfers; Count IV - Avoidance of Fraudulent Transfers
under Michigan's Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act; Count V - Breach
of Statutory Duties to Act in Good Faith and in the Best Interests
of the Company; Count VI - Equitable Subordination of Claims; and
Count VII - Claim Disallowance.

After numerous dispositive motions, rulings and amendments to the
complaint, Defendant filed his fourth motion for partial summary
judgment or, in the alternative, dismissal of Counts III, IV, V and
VI of the second amended complaint. In relevant part, Defendant
once again argued that the pre-petition transfers from Debtor to
Defendant were in repayment of loans Defendant advanced to Debtor,
while Plaintiff maintained that the advances were in fact capital
contributions. The crux of all the remaining claims is whether
Defendant's pre-petition advances to Debtor constitute debt or
capital contributions. At a hearing on Sept. 13, 2018, the Court
ruled that there is a genuine issue of material fact on whether the
advances constituted debt or capital contributions and ordered an
evidentiary hearing on this limited issue.

The issue before the Court is not whether the terms are ambiguous
or that missing terms may be supplied under the reasonableness
standard; rather, the issue is whether a loan existed and if so
under what terms. The cited cases interpreting written contracts
are of limited value to the Court's analysis. Defendant mainly
relies on Vision Information Services for the proposition that
"[w]hen a contract contains essential terms, but omits details of
performance, the law supplies missing details by construction."

Defendant is asking the Court to supply the entire contract, not
merely missing terms. There is no credible evidence that the
unsigned notes and alleged missing notes were ever executed.
Furthermore, there is no evidence before the Court regarding the
terms for these Advances. Accordingly, there is no credible
evidence establishing an agreement of an unconditional promise to
pay. Without an unconditional promise to pay, there is no loan. As
such, Plaintiff has established that there exists no right to
payment under Michigan law for these remaining Advances. With no
right to payment, Defendant does not have a "claim", and in turn,
no "debt" as defined under sections 101(12) and 101(5),
respectively. The transfers were not made on account of an
antecedent debt of Debtor. Therefore, Plaintiff has satisfied his
burden under section 548(a)(1)(B) and M.C.L. section 566.35 and
established that Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value
in exchange for the transfers.

As a separate basis for proving that the transfers from Debtor to
Defendant were not on account of antecedent debt, Plaintiff relies
on the Roth Steel factors articulated in In re AutoStyle Plastics,
Inc. As previously stated, the Roth Steel factors are equally
relevant in evaluating whether an advance is debt or a capital
contribution when making the determination of the reasonably
equivalent value element under section 548(a)(1)(B) and M.C.L.
section 566.35. The factors and analysis are as follows:

(1) the names given to the instruments, if any, evidencing the
indebtedness; (2) the presence or absence of a fixed maturity date
and schedule of payments; (3) the presence or absence of a fixed
rate of interest and interest payments; (4) the source of
repayments; (5) the adequacy or inadequacy of capitalization; (6)
the identity of interest between the creditor and the stockholder;
(7) the security, if any, for the advances; (8) the corporation's
ability to obtain financing from outside lending institutions; (9)
the extent to which the advances were subordinated to the claims of
outside creditors; (10) the extent to which the advances were used
to acquire capital assets; and (11) the presence or absence of a
sinking fund to provide repayments.

After considering all of the factors, the Court finds that overall
the factors weigh in favor of finding that the advances were
capital contributions, not loans. As such, Plaintiff has satisfied
his burden under section 548(a)(1)(B) and M.C.L. section 566.35,
and established his prima facie case that the advances were capital
contributions and, therefore, the transfers were not on account of
an antecedent debt.

A copy of the Court's Opinion dated Feb. 1, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2HY7BNp from Leagle.com.

Basil T. Simon, Plaintiff, represented by Lawrence J. Acker, Steven
Alexsy & Stephen P. Stella.

Michael Short, Defendant, represented by Thomas R. Morris --
morris@silvermanmorris.com -- Silverman & Morris, P.L.L.C.

                About Oakland Physicians

Oakland Physicians Medical Center, LLC, filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 15-51011) on July
22, 2015, estimating assets between $1 million and $10 million and
liabilities between $10 million and $50 million.  The petition was
signed by Yatinder M. Singhal, M.D., member/chairman of the Board.

The physician-owned 47-bed hospital Oakland Physicians Medical
Center, LLC, is head at Law Offices of Marc Voisenat.


OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS: Class Plaintiffs Object to Disclosures
-------------------------------------------------------------
Karim Khoja, the court-appointed lead plaintiff on behalf of
himself and the proposed class he represents in the Securities
Litigation, filed a limited and preliminary objection to the
approval on an interim basis of the Disclosure Statement explaining
Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.'s Plan of Liquidation.

Lead Plaintiff complains that the Plan does not classify or treat
the claims of Lead Plaintiff and the Proposed Class against the
Debtor, which are subordinated pursuant to section 510(b) of the
Bankruptcy Code. According to the Lead Plaintiff, this appears to
be simply an oversight, because neither the Securities Claims nor
the Securities Litigation are mentioned anywhere in the Plan or the
Disclosure Statement.

Lead Plaintiff asserts that the Debtor is a party to the Securities
Litigation and thus is subject to the PSLRA's document preservation
mandate, due to the operation of the automatic stay, the Securities
Litigation is currently stayed with respect to the Debtor. Lead
Plaintiff believes it is appropriate for the Plan to permit the
continued prosecution of the Securities Litigation against the
Debtor to the extent of any available residual entity coverage
under any applicable insurance policies, in which instance the
Debtor will remain a party to the Securities Litigation.

Lead Plaintiff points out that continuing preservation of the
Debtor's books, records, electronically stored information, and
other documents and items that are potentially relevant to the
Securities Litigation post-confirmation is absolutely crucial to
avoid prejudice to Lead Plaintiff and the Proposed Class,
particularly where the Debtor is liquidating and winding down.
However, Lead Plaintiff further points out that the Plan does not
contain and the Disclosure Statement does not describe any
requirement that the Debtor or the Wind Down Administrator and the
Wind Down Entity take any action to preserve documents and other
items potentially relevant to the Securities Litigation.

Bankruptcy Counsel for the Lead Plaintiff:

     Christopher P. Simon, Esq.
     CROSS & SIMON, LLC
     1105 North Market Street, Suite 901
     Wilmington, Delaware 19801
     Tel: 302-777-4200
     Fax: 302-777-4224
     Email: csimon@crosslaw.com

        -- and --

     Michael S. Etkin, Esq.
     Andrew Behlmann, Esq.
     LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP
     One Lowenstein Drive
     Roseland, New Jersey 07068
     Tel: 973-597-2500
     Fax: 973-597-2400
     Email: metkin@lowenstein.com
            abehlmann@lowenstein.com

                About Orexigen Therapeutics

Based in La Jolla, California, Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc. --
http://www.orexigen.com/-- is a biopharmaceutical company focused
on the treatment of weight loss and obesity.  It is a publicly
traded company with its shares listed on The NASDAQ Global Select
Market under the ticker symbol "OREX".  The company has 111
employees in the U.S.
                  
Orexigen Therapeutics sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 18-10518) on March 12,
2018.  In its petition signed by Michael A. Narachi, president and
CEO, the Debtor disclosed $265.1 million in assets and $226.4
million in liabilities.

Judge Kevin Gross presides over the cases.

The Debtor tapped Hogan Lovells US LLP as bankruptcy counsel;
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP as Delaware counsel; Ernst &
Young LLP as financial advisor; Perella Weinberg Partners as
investment banker; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims
and noticing agent.

Andrew R. Vara, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, appointed three
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors.


ORTEGA'S MEXICAN: Loses Clawback Suit vs Happy Rock Merchant
------------------------------------------------------------
The debtor, Ortega's Mexican Restaurant, LLC instituted the
adversary proceeding captioned ORTEGA'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT, LLC,
Plaintiff, v. HAPPY ROCK MERCHANT SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant, Adv.
Pro. No. 18-02036 (JJT) (Bankr. D. Conn.) against Happy Rock
Merchant Solutions, LLC seeking to avoid and recover transfers and
receive damages emanating from alleged fraud, usury, and CUTPA
violations. Happy Rock, by way of its answer, filed a counterclaim,
seeking a declaratory judgment to determine the validity, extent,
and ownership of certain of the Debtor's accounts receivable. At
the heart of the matter is a merchant sales agreement dated July
11, 2017, which the Debtor claims was a loan and Happy Rock claims
was a purchase of accounts receivable.

Having reviewed the parties' submissions and the law, Bankruptcy
Judge James J. Tancredi agrees with Happy Rock that the Agreement
was a purchase of accounts receivable.

The Debtor argues that the Agreement was for a loan because the
principal was repayable absolutely. Specifically, the Debtor argues
that the Debtor, upon execution of the Agreement, was immediately
in default because the Debtor had disclosed that it had received a
cash advance from another company, but the Agreement required it to
represent that it did not. The Debtor also contends that Happy Rock
did not perform sufficient due diligence to determine if the Debtor
was solvent but should have known that the Debtor was insolvent,
and that Happy Rock never provided the Debtor with information
concerning balances and reconciliation. Happy Rock counters that
the Agreement was for the purchase of accounts receivable because
the transaction between the parties has none of the markers of a
loan that New York courts look for in making such determination.
The Court agrees with Happy Rock.

To determine if repayment is absolute or contingent, courts weigh
three factors: (1) whether there is a reconciliation provision in
the agreement, (2) whether the agreement has a finite term, and (3)
whether there is any recourse should the merchant declare
bankruptcy.

Looking at the first factor, the presence of a reconciliation
provision, the Court notes that the parties stipulated to the fact
that the Debtor had the ability to review the Paysmith account
online to view balance information and inform Paysmith of errors
needing correction. "The reconciliation provisions allow the
merchant to seek an adjustment of the amounts being taken out of
its account based on its cash flow (or lack thereof). If a merchant
is doing poorly, the merchant will pay less, and will receive a
refund of anything taken by the company exceeding the specified
percentage (which often can also be adjusted downward). If the
merchant is doing well, it will pay more than the daily amount to
reach the specified percentage." The Debtor had both the ability to
check the amounts being taken from the Paysmith account and even
had the affirmative obligation to correct any errors. The Court
finds that this factor weighs in favor of the transaction not being
a loan.

As for the second factor, the presence of an indefinite term, the
Court notes that the Agreement has no set period for repayment. The
Debtor, however, believes that payment became definite and absolute
upon execution because the Debtor was simultaneously using another
merchant capital company and otherwise in material default at
inception. The Court is not persuaded.

The Debtor's argument is premised on a reading of the Agreement
that has no basis in New York contract law. To presume an automatic
default upon execution, the Court must construe the contract in a
way that renders most of the document a nullity. The Court is not
persuaded that the parties intended the absurd result of immediate
default.

Although the Debtor now would prefer that the pertinent provision
be construed so as to create automatic default, under normal
circumstances, a court would not find automatic default because to
do so would favor Happy Rock. The Court will not do so because it
is now advantageous for the Debtor. The Court's construction is
thus consistent with N.Y. U.C.C. section 1-304, which provides that
"[e]very contract or duty within [the Uniform Commercial Code]
imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance and
enforcement." The second factor, therefore, weighs in favor of
finding that the transaction was not for a loan.

Similar logic applies to the Court's analysis of the final factor,
the presence of a recourse provision for a party's insolvency.
Because the Court must construe the default provision cited above
to mean that Happy Rock has to declare a default for insolvency
before it can seek recourse, such a provision does not make the
amount paid repayable absolutely merely because the Debtor is in
bankruptcy. Even if the Court were to find this factor in the
Debtor's favor, in weighing all three factors, it is clear that
they weigh in favor of the conclusion that the Agreement was not
for a loan.

A copy of the Court's Ruling and Memorandum of Decision dated Feb.
1, 2019 is available at https://bit.ly/2FEdHkf from Leagle.com.

Ortega's Mexican Restaurant, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Kenneth
Raymond Davison, Action Advocacy PC.

Happy Rock Merchant Solutions, LLC, Defendant, represented by Joel
M. Jolles , Law Office of Joel M. Jolles.

            About Ortega's Mexican Restaurant

Ortega's Mexican Restaurant, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 18-20306) on March 5, 2018.  The
Debtor hired David F. Falvey, Esq., at Action Advocacy Law Office,
P.C., as counsel.


PEPPERTREE PARK: Liquidity Event Expected to Occur Late 2019
------------------------------------------------------------
Peppertree Park Villages 9 & 10, LLC, filed a sixth amended plan of
reorganization and accompanying disclosure statement, which provide
for the payment in full of all Allowed Claims.

This payment will be accomplished primarily from sources: (i) the
Effective Date Loan, (ii) an equity contribution in PLC of at least
$275,000 by the Contributing Partners, (iii) sale or other
disposition of assets prior to the Plan's Effective Date, and (iv)
proceeds from either the sale of the Property or a loan expected to
occur in late 2019. The Liquidity Event must occur no later than
December 31, 2019, or else the Debtors will be in default under the
Plan.

Contributions in the amount of at least $167,000 have already been
made by the Contributing Partners.

In June 2018, PDS initiated the public hearing process by sending
out a public notice package to Fallbrook residents and to the local
Fallbrook Planning Group.  Per PDS requirements, FPG noticed
multiple subcommittee hearings and a full public hearing for
informational purposes for the benefit of all local residents. In
addition, Peppertree 9 & 10, LLC made a public presentation to the
Peppertree Park Homeowners Association. Those local informational
hearings were followed by in August 2019 by formal FPG public
noticed subcommittee hearings for final voting purposes. The FPG
Land Use, Circulation, and Design Review Subcommittees presented
their new unanimous recommendations in favor of the project at the
Fallbrook Planning Group Meeting on August 20, 2018. The
Subcommittee favorable recommendations were followed by the public
comment period in which several residents spoke in favor of the
proposed project.  It is equally important to note there was not
one local resident who spoke or submitted a letter in opposition.
The full FPG group voted 11-0 in unanimous support of a formal
recommendation to the SD County Board of Supervisors for approval
of the Peppertree Park project. On December 28, 2018, Peppertree 9
& 10, LLC filed the third comprehensive Project Checklist Submittal
package to the SD County PDS. This submittal included a full update
to all the prior technical reports and studies. In addition,
complete responses were included for the checklist matrix.
Peppertree 9 & 10, LLC is of the opinion that the project will
obtain a final staff report by the end of the Second Quarter 2019
and followed by hearings with the SD County Planning Commission and
the Board of Supervisors in the Third or early Fourth Quarter
2019.

Class 5 General Unsecured Claims: Consists of four subclasses, each
consisting of all General Unsecured Claims asserted against one of
the four Debtors. Estimated Aggregate Claims Amount: $400,000.
Impaired. On the Effective Date or as soon thereafter as is
practicable, each holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim
shall receive the following: (a) a Class 5 Promissory Note or
interest in such Note, under which the applicable Reorganized
Debtor shall be obligated to pay the following: (i) Cash in the
full amount of the Allowed General Unsecured Claim without interest
on or before December 31, 2019 or pro rata share of sale’s
proceeds in the event of a failure of a Liquidity Event to occur;
(b) A person designated by the relevant Debtor and approved by the
Bankruptcy Court shall act on behalf of Class 5 as a note agent
(the “Class 5 Note Agent”) in connection with collecting and
enforcing the Class 5 Promissory Note in accordance with the Class
5 Note Agent Agreement. Estimated Percentage Recovery: 100%

Class 6 Known Disputed Unsecured Claims: Consists of four
subclasses, each of
which consists of all Known Disputed Unsecured Claims against one
of the four Debtors. Estimated Aggregate Claims Amount: $8,000,000.
Impaired. On the Effective Date or as soon thereafter as is
practicable, each holder of a Known Disputed Unsecured Claim shall
receive the following: a. Class 6 Promissory Note or interest in
such Note, under which the applicable Reorganized Debtor shall be
obligated to pay Cash in the full Amount of the Known Disputed
Claim without interest on the later of December 31, 2019 or when
such Claim becomes an Allowed Claim, or the pro rata share of the
sale’s proceeds in the event of a failure of a Liquidity Event to
occur. Estimated Percentage Recovery: 100%

Class 8 (Interests): Consists of two subclasses, with Subclass 8A
consisting of all Interests in each of the two entity Debtors,
Peppertree Park Villages 9&10, LLC and Northern Capital, Inc, and
Subclass 8B consisting of all Interests in Debtor PLC. Unimpaired
as to Subclass 8A. The holders of Interests in Subclass 8A shall
retain their Interests in the respective Debtor, provided, however,
that in the event that the Class 5 or Class 6 Claims are not paid
in accordance with the Plan, then the Interests owned by Class 8A
shall be extinguished and cancelled and the Debtors will be
dissolved in accordance with applicable state law. Impaired as to
Subclass 8B only if the general partners of PLC rely on the
contribution of “new value” to PLC in order to retain their
Interest in Reorganized PLC.

Class 9 Insider Claims: Consists of four subclasses, each
consisting of all Insider Claims against one of the four Debtors.
Impaired. Each Insider Claim including claims for contribution and
indemnity shall remain in force and effect on and after the
Effective and shall not be paid at the discretion of each Debtor
but not until all Plan obligations of the Reorganized Debtor with
respect to which an Insider Claim is asserted are fully satisfied.

The Liquidity Event shall occur on or before December 31, 2019 or
as otherwise ordered by the Court. The failure of the Liquidity
Event to occur by this deadline shall constitute a default pursuant
to section 13.4 of the Plan.

Plan Funding

   a. All payments under the Plan which are due on or about the
Effective Date will be funded from available Cash, the Effective
Date Loan, and/or proceeds of the New Equity Investment.

   b. The funds necessary to make payments and/or disbursements to
Claimants pursuant to this Plan after the Effective Date will be
(or may be) obtained from:

      (1) Any and all Cash retained or generated by the Reorganized
Debtors after the Effective Date;

      (2) The proceeds of the New Equity Investment;

      (3) The proceeds from the Liquidity Event; and

      (4) Any other contributions or financing the Reorganized
Debtors may obtain on or after the Effective Date.

   c. Cash received from the Effective Date Loan, the New Equity
Investment and the Liquidity Event will be the significant sources
of funds for satisfying the monetary obligations of the Plan. Below
is a brief description of how such Cash will be distributed
(subject to payments being made in the most tax efficient manner)
among the Debtors and paid to Claimants.

The New Equity Investment will be used by PLC to make any necessary
payments on or around the Effective Date.

The Cash from the Effective Date Loan to Peppertree 9 & 10, LLC
shall be used to pay off the Existing Loan, reserve $300,000 for
Entitlement Process Costs and pay administrative expenses as
allowed. If the Effective Date Loan funds are still available after
the above payments , such excess funds will be used to pay any
remaining administrative expenses. For purposes of the Disclosure
Statement and the Plan, Entitlement Process Costs shall mean all
governmental fees, professional fees, costs, expenses such as
travel and meals, and every type of cost or expense reasonably
necessary for Peppertree 9 & 10, LLC to obtain the tentative map
amendment rezoning the Property to residential.

The Cash from the Liquidity Event will be used by Peppertree 9 &
10, LLC to make any payments under the Plan.

The Cash from the sale, lease, or refinancing of the Morro Hill
property will be used to pay Mr. Urquhart’s and/or NCI’s Plan
obligations.

A redlined version of the Sixth Amended Disclosure Statement dated
March 20, 2019, is available at http://tinyurl.com/y2gfnqn8from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                 About Peppertree Park Villages

Headquartered in Bonsall, California, Peppertree Park Villages 9
and 10, LLC, listed its business as a single asset real estate (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)), whose principal assets are
located at 1654 S. Mission Rd, Fallbrook, California.  Peppertree
Park is an affiliate of Northern Capital, Inc., which sought
bankruptcy protection on Aug. 13, 2017 (Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No.
17-04845).

Peppertree Park Villages 9&10, LLC (Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No.
17-05137) and affiliate Peppertree Land Company (Bankr. S.D. Cal.
Case No. 17-05135) each filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
on Aug. 28, 2017.  The petitions were signed by Duane Urquhart as
managing general partner, who also sought bankruptcy protection on
Aug. 13, 2017 (Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No. 17-04846).

Peppertree Land and Peppertree Park each estimated their assets and
liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million.

Marwill Hogan, Esq., at Foley & Lardner, LLP, serves as the
Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.


PS HOLDCO: S&P Affirms 'B+' Rating on $270MM First-Lien Term Loan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings announced that it affirmed its 'B+' issuer
credit rating on Birmingham, Ala.-based flatbed transportation
provider PS HoldCo LLC, and said the outlook is stable.

The rating affirmation follows the company's entry into an
agreement to acquire a logistics business, to be funded
with a proposed $45 million add-on to its $270 million first-lien
term loan and a $20 million draw on its unrated $75 million
asset-based revolving credit facility.

S&P also affirmed its 'B+' issue-level rating on the company's term
loan including the proposed add-on.

The rating affirmation on PS HoldCo reflects that pro forma for the
proposed debt-financed acquisition, S&P expects adjusted debt to
EBITDA will remain at about 4x by year-end 2019. Continued earnings
growth from acquisitions as well as organically should offset the
additional borrowings to fund acquisitions. S&P assumes the company
will continue to benefit from good freight volumes in 2019 as well
as tight industry capacity increasing rates.

The stable outlook on PS HoldCo reflects S&P's assumption that the
company will continue to benefit from earnings growth from
acquisitions as well as organically, given the rating agency's
expectation for continued strength in freight volumes in 2019.
Despite modest declines in the company's EBITDA margins tied to the
company's expected business mix shift and net increases in original
equipment manufacturer (OEM) financing, S&P expects the company's
credit measures to remain stable in 2019.

"We could lower our ratings on PS HoldCo if we believed that its
ratio of funds from operations (FFO) to total adjusted debt would
decline below 12% or if its adjusted debt to EBITDA would increase
above 5x on a sustained basis. This could occur from an unexpected
weakening of U.S. freight volumes, contributing to EBITDA
declines," S&P said. Alternatively, the company's debt to EBITDA
could weaken from meaningful increases in the company's OEM
financing or unanticipated debt-financed transactions, according to
S&P.

"We consider an upgrade unlikely over the next 12 months given our
belief that PS HoldCo's financial policies will remain aggressive
over the medium term under its financial sponsor. However, we could
raise our ratings if we came to believe that the company were
committed to maintaining FFO to debt greater than 20% and
demonstrated sustained debt reduction (with leverage approaching
3x), and we expected a low risk of increasing adjusted debt to
EBITDA above 4x," S&P said.


PURADYN FILTER: Reports $4.2 Million Net Sales for 2018
-------------------------------------------------------
Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated reported net sales for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018 of $4,203,556 compared to $2,250,141 for
the same period in 2017, an increase of 87%.  Gross profit, as a
percentage of sales, increased to 41% in 2018 versus 22% in 2017.
Income from operations for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018 was
$111,070 as compared to a loss of $(956,578) in 2017.

The Company reported a net loss of $(216,382) or $(0.00) per share
for 2018 compared to a net loss of $(1,230,094) or $(0.00) per
share for 2017.

Key business highlights from 2018 include:

   * Puradyn's exclusive distributor for the oil and gas segment,
     NOW, Inc. (DNOW), continues to open new doors and secure new
     clients as a result of increased training of DNOW salespeople
   
     in target regions, including East and West Texas, Oklahoma,
     Ohio, Pennsylvania, Denver, and Dubai:

       - The last of the largest contractors that the Company had
         targeted in the land drilling segment began installing
         Puradyn systems on their fleet.

       - Legend Energy Services became its first customer in
         pressure pumping, a segment which has the potential to
         provide 3 to 4 times the sales as the land rig segment.
         Legend began testing the Company's systems in early 2018
         and within a few months proceeded to equip their entire
         fleet.  Other customers in pressure pumping are conducting

         trials.

       - A large client in the midstream segment concluded testing

         of the Company's systems to support their pipeline
transfer
         stations and has recommended expanded installations.

MNI Diesel, LLC became the exclusive distributor of Puradyn
products to the commercial marine industry for the Ohio and
Mississippi River Valleys and areas along the U.S. Gulf Coast.  MNI
has significant experience with selling, installing, and monitoring
the success of Puradyn systems on their clients' vessels, making
them a powerful advocate for the product line.

A large order bound for Afghanistan to be used on power generation
systems was fulfilled.

Ed Vittoria, CEO, commented, "2018 was a record year for Puradyn
with sales surpassing $4 million and the achievement of an
operating profit. Sales of new systems doubled in 2018, which will
further drive filter demand going forward. Our pipeline of new and
engaged prospective customers in the oil and gas segment has grown
significantly with the expansion into pressure pumping and
midstream/pipeline segments, and our commercial marine business is
growing thanks to our expanded relationship with MNI Diesel.
Finally, we are seeing demand increase for systems that support
power generation for military support operations in remote regions
of the world."

                        About Puradyn Filter

Boynton Beach, Fla.-based Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated
(OTC BB: PFTI) -- http://www.puradyn.com/-- designs, manufactures,
markets and distributes worldwide the Puradyn bypass oil filtration
system for use with substantially all internal combustion engines
and hydraulic equipment that use lubricating oil.

Puradyn Filter reported a net loss of $216,382 for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $1.23 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, Puradyn Filter had $1.87
million in total assets, $10.90 million in total liabilities, and a
total stockholders' deficit of $9.03 million.

Liggett & Webb, P.A., in Boynton Beach, Florida, the Company's
auditor since 2006, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated March 25, 2019, on the Company's consolidated
financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, noting that
the Company has experienced net losses since inception and negative
cash flows from operations and has relied on loans from related
parties to fund its operations.  These factors raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


QEP RESOURCES: Moody's Confirms Ba3 CFR & Ba3 on $2.1BB Sr. Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service confirmed the Ba3 Corporate Family Rating
(CFR) and the Ba3-PD Probability of Default Rating of QEP
Resources, Inc. (QEP). Moody's also confirmed the rating on the
company's $2.1 billion senior unsecured notes at Ba3. The company's
Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating was affirmed at SGL-2. The
rating outlook was changed to negative. These actions conclude the
ratings review initiated on March 2, 2018, after QEP announced its
plan to divest the non-Permian assets (Williston, Uinta, and
Haynesville) in its portfolio.

The company has since sold its Uinta and Haynesville assets, and
has terminated the agreement to sell its Williston assets, which it
will continue to develop and operate. On February 20, 2019, the
company also commenced a comprehensive strategic review to maximize
shareholder value, which could result in a merger or sale of the
company, or other transaction impacting the entire company or the
remaining assets.

"The confirmation of QEP's ratings reflects the combined scale of
its Permian and Williston positions. Without the Williston assets,
the company would have insufficient scale and a weaker business
profile than needed to support its Ba3 rating," commented Arvinder
Saluja, Moody's Vice President. "However, the negative outlook
points to the company's uncertain strategic direction and
continuing event risk, along with higher execution risk pertaining
to production growth in the near term."

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: QEP Resources, Inc.

Outlook, Changed To Negative From Rating Under Review

Confirmations:

Issuer: QEP Resources, Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Confirmed at Ba3-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Confirmed at Ba3

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Confirmed at Ba3 (LGD4)

Affirmations:

Issuer: QEP Resources, Inc.

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Affirmed SGL-2

RATINGS RATIONALE

QEP's Ba3 CFR is supported by its combined production and reserve
base in the Permian and Williston basins, which provide basin
diversification and competitive oil-focused economics, and its
lower exposure to natural gas production after the divestiture of
Uinta and Haynesville assets. The ratings also benefit from good
leverage metrics and interest coverage metrics, which are supported
by the company's increased liquids production, decent hedge
portfolio, sizable presence in the Permian Basin, and its good
liquidity position aided by the company's intention to achieve
cash-flow neutrality in 2019. The company is challenged by the high
cost of its acquired assets on a per acre basis, high capital
intensity, a reduced production scale, and execution risk as it
continues to develop its Permian acreage and grow production while
countering decline in Williston Basin production in the first half
of 2019. The rating also reflects the company's significantly
increased financial leverage as measured against reserves and
production.

QEP's SGL-2 rating reflects Moody's expectation that the company
will maintain good liquidity into 2020. As of December 31, 2018,
the company had $430 million outstanding under its $1.25 billion
unsecured revolving credit facility, which matures in 2022.
However, QEP repaid the revolver borrowings outstanding with
proceeds from the Haynesville divestiture in January 2019. Moody's
expects the company to not outspend its cash flow in 2019, while
maintaining full revolver availability and $150 million cash on the
balance sheet. Moody's expects QEP to maintain headroom under its
financial covenants: net Debt/Capitalization (requirement of less
than to 60%), Net Debt/EBITDAX (less than 3.75x), and present value
(PV-9) to net funded debt ratio (at least 1.4x through December
2019 and 1.5x thereafter). Since the credit facility is unsecured,
the company can sell properties to raise cash (up to 15% of net
book value without lender approval). QEP has a manageable debt
maturity schedule, with its next maturity of $51.8 million coming
due in March 2020.

The QEP senior notes and revolving credit facility are all issued
at the parent level, are unsecured and have no subsidiary
guarantees. The senior notes are rated the same as QEP's Ba3 CFR
since all of QEP's debts are pari passu in its capital structure.

The negative outlook reflects the uncertainty regarding the ongoing
strategic review and accompanying event risk. It also captures
execution risk emanating from QEP's plan to make its cost structure
more competitive and reduce its capital intensity.

Moody's could downgrade the ratings if RCF/debt falls below 20%, or
production approaches 70 mboe/day. The ratings could also be
downgraded if QEP experiences operational issues disrupting the
anticipated production growth in the Permian Basin or if the
company's financial policies become more aggressive.

The outlook could be stabilized as the company demonstrates success
in reducing its cost structure and as further clarity emerges on
the strategic review and its potential further effects on the
company's business profile and financial metrics. A ratings upgrade
is unlikely given the event risk and its reduced scale. However,
Moody's could consider an upgrade if production exceeds 125
mboe/day and remains oil-weighted, and RCF/debt is sustained above
30%.

QEP Resources, Inc. (QEP) is a publicly traded independent crude
oil and natural gas exploration and production (E&P) company
focused in two regions, North Dakota and Texas.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Independent
Exploration and Production Industry published in May 2017.


RESURRECTION LIFE: Plan Adds Post-Petition Income, Expenses Report
------------------------------------------------------------------
Resurrection Life Ministries, Inc., filed an amended disclosure
statement in support of its plan of reorganization dated March 19,
2019.

The amended plan adds a report revealing the Debtor's post-petition
income and expenses as follows:

September 2018
Income: $36,642.09
Expenses: $31,419.76

October 2018
Income: $56,689.71
Expenses: $43,111.31

November 2018
Income: $40,372.18
Expenses: $37,612.21

December 2018
Income: $51,971.06
Expenses: $71,376.46

January 2019
Income: $48,246.35
Expenses: $47,184.25

February 2019
Income: $47,181.78
Expenses: $51,981.00

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated March
19, 2019 is available at http://tinyurl.com/yya3ec45from
Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

             About Resurrection Life Ministries

Based in Memphis, Tennessee, Resurrection Life Ministries, Inc.,
dba Grace Christian Fellowship Church, Inc. is an
interdenominational, Christ-centered ministry that seeks to apply
New Testament principles to every area of peoples' lives.

The Church filed for chapter 11 protection on (Bankr. W.D. Tenn.
Case No. 18-27490) on Sept. 7, 2018, listing its total assets at
$640,000 and total liabilities at $4,120,718. The petition was
signed by Leo Holt, pastor.


REVOLUTION MONITORING: Medical Receivables to Fund Plan Payments
----------------------------------------------------------------
Revolution Monitoring, LLC, Revolution Monitoring Management, LLC
and Revolution  Neuromonitoring, LLC  filed a Joint Plan of
Reorganization and accompanying Joint Disclosure Statement.

Class 7 Claimants (Allowed Unsecured Creditors) are impaired and
shall be paid their pro rata share of an Unsecured Creditors Pool.
The Class 7 Claimants shall specifically  include the claims if any
of Texas Legal Escrow, LLC.  The Claims of Texas Legal were listed
as  disputed, unliquidated and contingent by the Debtors.
Confirmation of this  Plan shall allow the Debtors to file a UCC-3
Termination of the alleged security interest of Texas Legal. The
Class 7 Creditors shall share pro rata in all funds recovered
pursuant to the collection.

Class 4 Claimant (Allowed Secured Claim of John McHalffey) is
impaired and shall be satisfied as follows: John McHalffey has
filed a Proof of Claim asserting a secured claim against Debtor
Revolution Neuromonitoring, LLC. McHalffey asserts a Cash Loan
Security Agreement dated August 12,2016 in the original amount of
$200,000. McHalffey filed a UCC-I Financing Statement number
17-0024480935 on July 18, 2017 asserting a lien on "Certain
Accounts Receivable for Invoices Issued in 2015 and 2016".
McHalffey shall be paid the amount of his allowed secured claim
from the collection of his secured invoices in the order of
priority of his security interest.

Class 5 Claimant (Xvnergv Healthcare Capital II, LLC) is impaired
and shall be satisfied as follows: Debtors Revolution Monitoring
Management, LLC and Revolution Neuromonitoring, LLC entered into
that certain Healthcare Receivables Master Purchase and Sale
Agreement ("Agreement") with Xynergy on or about November 22, 2016.
On or about May 18, 2018, the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida entered that certain Consent Final
Judgment in favor of Xynergy and against the Debtors in the amount
of $1,681,767.57 ("Xynergy Claim").

Class 6 Claimant (World Global Capital, LLC) is impaired and shall
be satisfied as  follows: On or about September 25, 2017, Debtors
entered into that certain Secured Merchant Agreement ("Agreement")
with World Global Capital, LLC dba Cardinal Funding ("World") for
the sale and purchase of certain future accounts receivable in the
original amount of S224,850.  On or about November 7, 2017, World
obtained a Judgment against the Debtors in the amount
ofS202,705.66. The Debtors dispute the validity of the lien of
World in that no future receivables were produced after September
25, 2017 for World's lien to attach. To the extent, World has a
valid lien and an Allowed Claim, World will be paid the amount of
its Allowed Secured Claim from the proceeds of the collections
after payment in full to the Allowed Claims in Classes 1 through
5.

The Debtors will not be continuing in business.  The collection of
the Medical Receivables is the best source of funds to pay the
creditors.  The Debtors believe the collections efforts of Real
Time provide the creditors with the best opportunity for
repayment.

The Debtor has retained Kessler & Collins to pursue claims against
former collectors Medical Practice Solutions.  The Debtor intends
to continue that matter and upon confirmation will pay Kessler &
Collins a $10,000 deductible required under the Debtor's insurance
policy.  The Debtors will also retain the Voss Law Firm to pursue
wrongful denial and damages against insurance companies.

A full-text copy of the Joint Disclosure Statement dated March 7,
2019, is available at http://tinyurl.com/y6xjafvxfrom
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

              About Revolution Monitoring

Revolution Monitoring is a healthcare services provider in Dallas,
Texas.

Revolution Monitoring sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 18-42152) on Sept. 27,
2018.  In the petition signed by Jeremiah Titus Vance, president,
the Debtor estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.


ROADHOUSE HOLDING: 3rd Cir. Upholds Dismissal of W. English Appeal
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned IN RE: ROADHOUSE HOLDING INC., ET AL.,
Debtors. WAYNE ENGLISH, Appellant, No. 18-2640 (3rd Cir.), the U.S.
Court of Appeals, Third Circuit affirmed District Court's orders
dismissing his bankruptcy appeal as untimely and denying his
related motion for reconsideration.

The 14-day time period for filing a bankruptcy appeal is mandatory
and jurisdictional. It is undisputed that the 14-day appeal period,
in this case, expired on June 8, 2017. The Third Circuit agrees
with the District Court that English's notice of appeal from the
Bankruptcy Court's decision was filed after that deadline. As the
District Court explained, the notice was filed, at the earliest, in
the afternoon on June 9, when the notice first arrived in the
Bankruptcy Court's "unit" at the local post office.

Although English's notice of appeal was untimely, he had the
opportunity to cure this defect by moving the Bankruptcy Court, on
or before June 29, 2017, to extend the time to appeal based on a
claim of excusable neglect. However, he did not file such a motion.
Accordingly, the District Court had no choice but to dismiss
English's appeal as time-barred, and the District Court did not err
in subsequently denying his motion for reconsideration.

Thus, the Third Circuit affirms the District Court's March 22, 2018
and June 27, 2018 orders. English's motion to supplement the record
on appeal is denied, as he has not demonstrated that this case
presents the type of "exceptional circumstances" that warrant
supplementation.

A copy of the Court's Opinion dated Feb. 5, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2FuAgGI from Leagle.com.

              About Roadhouse Holding Inc.

Roadhouse Holding Inc. was founded in 2010 and is based in New
York.  Roadhouse Holding, along with seven affiliates which include
Logan's Roadhouse Inc. and LRI Holdings Inc., filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 16-11819) on Aug. 8,
2016.

Roadhouse Holding, et al., are represented by Robert S. Brady,
Esq., Edmon L. Morton, Esq., Ryan M. Bartley, Esq., Elizabeth S.
Justison, Esq., and Norah M. Roth-Moore, Esq., at Young Conaway
Stargatt & Taylor, LLP.

Hilco Real Estate, LLC, serves as real estate advisor to the
Debtors; Jefferies LLC as financial advisor; and Donlin Recano &
Company as claims and noticing agent.

Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, on August 19, 2016,
appointed five creditors of Roadhouse Holding Inc. to serve on the
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Kelley Drye & Warren
LLP has been tapped as lead counsel to the Committee while
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP has been tapped as co-counsel.
FTI Consulting, Inc. serves as financial advisor.

Dechert LLP and Ashby & Geddes, P.A., serve as counsel to (a) BOKF,
NA, as successor to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
trustee and collateral agent under that certain Senior Secured
Notes Indenture, dated as of Oct. 4, 2010; (b) Carl Marks
Management Company, LLC; and (c) Marblegate Asset Management, LLC.


ROSLYN SEFARDIC: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Roslyn Sefardic Center Corp.
        1 Potters Lane
        Roslyn Heights, NY 11577

Business Description: Roslyn Sefardic Center Corp. is a tax-exempt
                      religious organization headquartered in
                      Roslyn Heights, New York.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 26, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York (Central Islip)

Case No.: 19-72217

Judge: Hon. Louis A. Scarcella

Debtor's Counsel: Rachel S. Blumenfeld, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF RACHEL S. BLUMENFELD
                  26 Court Street, Suite 2220
                  Brooklyn, NY 11242
                  Tel: (718) 858-9600       
                  Fax: (718) 858-9601
                  Email: rblmnf@aol.com

Total Assets: $1,096,000

Total Liabilities: $440,408

The petition was signed by Herzel Tal, president.

The Debtor lists Village of East Hills as its sole unsecured
creditor holding a claim of $58,000.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb19-72217.pdf

Prior bankruptcy cases filed:

  District                   Case No.          Date Filed
  --------                   --------          ----------
EDNY (Central Islip)         19-70829            2/01/19
EDNY (Central Islip)         18-70785            2/05/18
EDNY (Cenral Islip)          16-70299            1/25/16
EDNY (Central Islip)         12-74404            7/16/12


SIX FLAGS: Moody's Rates Proposed $1.15-Bil. Secured Loans 'Ba1'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba1 rating to Six Flags
Entertainment Corporation's subsidiary's proposed senior secured
credit facility (including a $350 million revolver and an $800
million term loan B). The B1 corporate family rating (CFR), B1-PD
probability of default rating, and B2 rating on the existing senior
unsecured notes are unchanged. The outlook is stable.

The transaction increases the revolving credit facility to $350
million from $250 million and increases the term loan B to $800
million from $584 million while extending out the maturity dates.
The proceeds of the $800 million term loan B are expected to be
used to repay the $188 million outstanding on the current revolver,
repay the $584 million balance of the existing term loan B, add
cash to the balance sheet, and pay transaction related fees. The
revolver is typically drawn in the beginning of the year and then
paid down with free cash flow during the summer operating season.
The repayment of the revolver with additional term loan at this
point in the season is expected to increase the available cash that
could be used for stock buybacks or dividends.

Leverage pro forma for the transaction is expected to increase to
4.6x as calculated by Moody's including all stock compensation or
5.1x excluding performance award related stock compensation from
4.4x and 4.8x respectively as of Q4 2018. Leverage increases due to
the revolver draw at the start of 2019 and additional debt used to
add cash to the balance sheet and pay transaction related fees.
Stock compensation was negative $47 million in 2018 due to a $63
million reversal of performance award based stock compensation as
the goal to reach $600 million in Modified EBITDA was not met. The
5.1x pro forma leverage metric reverses out the impact of the $63
million stock comp reversal and includes only ordinary stock
compensation of $16 million. The senior unsecured note rating is
unchanged at B2, but the Loss Given Default for the debt changes to
LGD-5 from LGD-4 due to the increase in the amount of secured debt
compared to unsecured debt outstanding. The rating on the existing
senior secured credit facility will be withdrawn after repayment.

Assignments:

Issuer: Six Flags Theme Parks Inc. (subsidiary of Six Flags
Entertainment Corporation)

$800 million Gtd Senior Secured Term Loan B due 2026, Assigned Ba1
(LGD2)

$350 million Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility due 2024,
Assigned Ba1 (LGD2)

Unchanged:

Issuer: Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

$1,000 million Senior Unsecured Notes due 2024, B2 (LGD5 from
LGD4)

$500 million Senior Unsecured Notes due 2027, B2 (LGD5 from LGD4)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's B1 CFR reflects its sizable
attendance and revenue generated from the geographically
diversified regional amusement park portfolio. Pro forma leverage
as of Q4 2018 is 4.6x including all stock compensation or 5.1x
excluding performance award related stock compensation, but
including regular stock compensation. The management team installed
in conjunction with the company's emergence from bankruptcy in
April 2010 has implemented significant operational improvements to
drive dramatic earnings growth. Ongoing initiatives, including
price increases, new membership and loyalty offerings, acquisitions
of smaller parks adjacent to its larger parks, expansion of the
operating season at select parks and higher all season dining
revenue, are expected to continue to contribute to revenue and
earnings over the intermediate term. Capital expenditures on new
rides and attractions as well as international licensing agreements
are also expected to contribute to EBITDA growth. The company is
sensitive to changes in discretionary consumer spending,
seasonality of operations, and is expected to pursue shareholder
friendly transactions such as stock buy backs (funded from free
cash flow or additional debt) and higher dividend distributions.
Amusement park operators must compete with an increasingly wide
variety of leisure and entertainment activities to generate
consumer interest. Attendance levels are also very sensitive to
weather conditions. Moody's expects positive revenue growth in the
upcoming season barring unusually heavy rainfall during the peak
summer operating season.

Six Flags' SGL-3 speculative-grade liquidity rating reflects
Moody's expectation that the company will maintain adequate
liquidity over the next year. Six Flags had $45 million in cash at
the end of 2018 (compared to $77 million at YE 2017 and $137
million at YE 2016) with $43 million outstanding on its revolver
(with $18 million in letters of credit) as of Q4 2018. The current
transaction upsizes the revolver to $350 million from $250 million
previously and extends the maturity date to 2024 from 2020.
Additional amounts were drawn on the existing revolver following Q4
2018 which are expected to be repaid from the upsized term loan
with additional cash added to the balance sheet. The company is
expected to spend about 9% of revenue on capex each year ($136
million spent in 2018) and pay approximately $115 million in cash
interest expense in 2019. Moody's projects Six Flags will payout
approximately $280 million in dividends in 2019 (compared to $267
million in 2018) which will consume the bulk of its cash flow
generation over the next year. Normal off-season cash flow
consumption occurs prior to the start of the operating season each
year and the repayment of the revolver balance will lead to larger
amounts of available cash flow which Moody's expects will be used
for stock buybacks or dividends. Six Flags is projected to be
subject to a maximum senior secured leverage ratio of 4x which
additional step downs over time. The company is not expected to be
subject to a minimum interest coverage ratio any longer in the new
credit agreement. Moody's projects the company will maintain a
substantial cushion of compliance.

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's expectation that Six
Flags will generate low to mid-single percentage organic EBITDA
growth in 2019 which will lead leverage to decline to approximately
4.9x if weather conditions are favorable and there are no
additional debt funded share buybacks. Moody's projects the company
will devote cash flow to dividends and share repurchases with
minimal debt reduction over the next 12-18 months.

Positive revenue and EBITDA growth that led to debt to EBITDA
leverage being sustained in the low 4xs (as calculated by Moody's)
and a more moderate financial policy with reduced prospects of a
debt funded share buyback could lead to an upgrade. A good
liquidity position would also be required for an upgrade as would
the management of dividends and stock repurchases within excess
free cash flow.

Downward rating pressure could result if acquisitions, shareholder
friendly transactions, or declines in attendance and earnings
driven by competition or a prolonged economic downturn led to
debt-to-EBITDA above 5.5x on a sustained basis. A weakened
liquidity position or sustained negative free cash flow could also
lead to negative rating pressure.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (Six Flags), headquartered in
Grand Prairie, TX, is a regional amusement park company that
currently operates 25 North American theme and waterparks. The park
portfolio includes 22 wholly-owned facilities (including parks near
New York City, Chicago and Los Angeles) - as well as three
consolidated partnership parks - Six Flags over Texas (SFOT), Six
Flags over Georgia (SFOG), and White Water Atlanta. Six Flags
currently owns 53.2% of SFOT and 31% of SFOG/White Water Atlanta.
In addition, the company has international licensing agreements in
China, Dubai, and Saudi Arabia. The company emerged from chapter 11
bankruptcy protection in April 2010. Revenue including full
consolidation of the partnership parks was approximately $1.5
billion in FY 2018.


SOLERA PARENT: S&P Assigns B- Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B-' issuer credit rating to Solera
Parent Holding LLC, a U.S.-based provider of risk and asset
management software and services to the global automobile and
property market.

Solera is the parent company of the Solera group (which includes
Solera Holdings Inc.) and is also the entity that issues the
audited financial statements.

S&P also affirmed its 'B-' issuer credit rating on Solera Holdings
Inc. and 'B' and 'CCC+' issue-level ratings on its secured and
unsecured debt, respectively. The '2' and '5' recovery ratings on
the secured and unsecured loans, respectively, remain unchanged.

The 'B-' issuer credit rating on Solera is based on its good
position as a risk and asset management software and services
provider to the automotive markets, including the global property
and casualty insurance industry, its continued growth potential,
and its proprietary auto market analytical data. Solera has a solid
recurring revenue base (97%), with predictable transactions and
subscription revenue driven by the stickiness of its software
offerings and high switching costs. Revenue retention rates are
approximately 96% annually. The company also benefits from fairly
diverse customer segments led by insurance providers, collision
shops, and service, maintenance, and repair (SMR) facilities. Its
niche product focus within the automotive property and casualty
industries, acquisitive growth strategy, and high-risk tolerance
and  debt leverage of about 11x at Dec. 31, 2018 offset these
strengths. Preferred equity adds about two turns in S&P's leverage
calculation. S&P expects the company to grow earnings as the
company grows its content in existing clients modestly and as
claims processes become increasingly more complex with the
increased use of technology in cars.   The stable outlook on Solera
reflects S&P's expectation of revenue growth, earnings improvement,
and adequate liquidity despite minimal FOCF in fiscal 2019 and
about $25 million of debt amortization annually because the rating
agency deems the capital structure to be highly leveraged (debt to
EBITDA above 10x.).

"We could lower the rating on Solera with less-than-adequate
liquidity or a material decline in its market positions such that
we view the capital structure to be unsustainable," S&P said. This
could occur with key customer losses and negative free cash flow,
according to S&P.

"While material deleveraging is unlikely given the payment-in-kind
(PIK) nature of Solera's preferred equity (which we treat as debt),
we could raise the rating if leverage remains below 9x with
consistent FOCF to debt above 3% and EBITDA to interest coverage
above 2.5x," S&P said.


SPANISH TRAIL: Still Bound to Terms of STMA Agreement, Ct. Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada granted in
part and denied in part Spanish Trail Master Association's motion
for determination that agreements are not executor contracts.

The ST Master Association argues that the Homeowners Associations
(HOA) Agreements are covenants that run with the land that could
not, as a matter of law, be deemed to be executory contracts
capable of rejection under the Confirmed Plan. Debtor responds that
the HOA Agreements are executory contracts that were rejected under
the Confirmed Plan because they were not included in Schedule 6.1's
list of assumed contracts. Debtor alternatively argues that even if
the HOA Agreements were not rejected, they were sold to Lender free
and clear of the same, subject to Permitted Encumbrances, which
only included, in pertinent part, the Master Declaration and
certain deeds attached to the STA Agreement. In its Reply, the ST
Master Association contends that Debtor could not sell the Club and
related property free and clear of its covenants that run with the
land.

Based on the record, the court finds no ambiguity with respect to
the treatment of the ST Master Association Agreement under the
Confirmed Plan. As previously stated, the Approved Disclosure
Statement, the Confirmed Plan, and the FF&CL consistently,
expressly, and unambiguously reflect that the STA Master Agreement
was vital to the Debtor's reorganization and was intended to
continue undisturbed during the post-confirmation period. Indeed,
the structure of the Confirmed Plan contemplated that Reorganized
Debtor would lease the Club from Lender and continue to derive
income from the assumed Membership Contracts, with the hopes that
it could attract new members based on, in part, the additional
benefits and security assured pursuant to the continued vitality of
the ST Master Association Agreement. The court, therefore,
concludes that under the Confirmed Plan, the parties to the instant
Motion continue to be bound by the terms of the ST Master
Association Agreement.

The motion for determination is, therefore, granted in part and
denied in part. The parties to the present Motion remain bound by
the agreement between Debtor, ST Master Association and Spanish
Trail Associates, a Nevada limited partnership, executed Feb. 21,
1984.

The bankruptcy case is in re: SPANISH TRAIL COUNTRY CLUB, INC.,
Chapter 11, Debtor, Case No. 11-23466-MKN (Bankr. D. Nev.).

A copy of the Court's Order dated Feb. 1, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2WphhEs from Leagle.com.

SPANISH TRAIL COUNTRY CLUB, INC., Debtor, represented by CANDACE C.
CLARK, CLARK HILL PLC, KIRK D. HOMEYER, BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER
SCHRECK, LLP, GORDON SILVER & MATTHEW C. ZIRZOW, LARSON ZIRZOW &
KAPLAN, LLC.

U.S. TRUSTEE - LV - 11, 11, U.S. Trustee, represented by ATHANASIOS
E. ANGELOPOULOS.

Las Vegas, Nevada-based Spanish Trail Country Club Inc. filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy Protection (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 11-23466)
on Aug. 24, 2011.  Judge Bruce A. Markell presides over the case.
Gerald M. Gordon, Esq., at Gordon Silver, represents the Debtor.
The Debtor estimated assets of between $1 million and $10 million,
and debts of between $10 million and $50 million.


SPYBAR MANAGEMENT: Taps Gensburg Calandriello as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Spybar Management, LLC, received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Illinois to hire Gensburg
Calandriello & Kanter, P.C., as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; represent the Debtor in negotiation with its
creditors; provide legal advice regarding bankruptcy and corporate
law, corporate governance, tax, labor and other issues related to
its business operations; and provide other legal services in
connection with its Chapter 11 case.

The attorneys who will be handling the case are:

     E. Philip Groben         $310
     Matthew Gensburg         $425
     Anthony Calandriello     $350
     Alexis Clinebell         $260

Other attorneys will render services to the Debtor as needed.
Generally, Gensburg charges these hourly fees:

     Shareholder                     $325 - $500
     Senior Counsel                      $425
     Associates                      $260 - $325
     Legal Assistants/Paralegals         $125

Prior to the petition date, the firm received payments totaling
$30,000 for the preparation of the case.

Gensburg is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     E. Philip Groben, Esq.  
     Matthew T. Gensburg, Esq.
     Gensburg Calandriello & Kanter, P.C.
     200 West Adams St., Ste. 2425
     Chicago, IL 60606
     Phone:  312-263-2200
     Fax:  312-263-2242
     E-mail: pgroben@gcklegal.com

                          About Spybar

Spybar Management, LLC, is an Illinois company organized on Jan. 8,
2008.  In conjunction with a non-filing affiliate, Skyline
Management Co., Spybar Management operates Spybar Chicago, a
nightclub in Chicago's vibrant River North neighborhood.

Spybar Management filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill.
Case No. 19-05128) on Feb. 27, 2019.  The case is assigned to Judge
Carol A. Doyle.  Gensburg, Calandriello & Kanter P.C. is the
Debtor's counsel.


STAPLES INC: Moody's Rates $3.2BB Term Loan & $750MM Notes 'B1'
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Staples, Inc.'s B1 Corporate
Family Rating and B1-PD Probability of Default ratings. Moody's
also assigned a B1 rating to the company's proposed $3.2 billion
seven year senior secured term loan, a B1 rating to its proposed
$750 million seven year senior secured notes, and a B3 rating to
its proposed $1.375 billion eight year senior unsecured notes.

Proceeds from the proposed debt offering will be used to refinance
Staples' existing secured term loan due 2024 and senior unsecured
notes due 2025, and fund a $1.021 billion distribution to the
company's owner, affiliates of Sycamore Partners. The B1 rating on
the Staple's existing secured term loan and B3 rating on its
existing senior unsecured notes will be withdrawn upon closing.
Staples' existing $1.2 billion ABL facility due 2022 (not-rated)
will not be affected by the refinancing and will remain in the
company's capital structure.

The affirmation of Staples' B1 Corporate Family Rating reflects the
company's solid performance since the LBO in September 2017 and its
ability to quickly reduce leverage incurred to fund the proposed
dividend recap through a combination of debt repayment and
continued EBITDA growth. Moody's estimates pro-forma adjusted
debt/EBITDA will rise to around 5.5x as a result of the dividend
recapitalization from an estimated 4.9x at fiscal year ended
February 2019. This estimate also includes debt and EBITDA
associated with Staples' recently-closed acquisition of Dex
Imaging, Inc. and fees from the company's shared services agreement
with Essendant, Inc. Over the next year, EBITDA will increase from
a combination of recent acquisitions, continued cost efficiencies
and modest EBITDA growth in the core business. This growth together
with debt repayment using Staples' significant free cash flow will
bring leverage down to around 4.6x by fiscal year end February
2020.

Assignments:

Issuer: Staples, Inc.

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned B1 (LGD3)

Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned B1 (LGD3)

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned B3 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Staples, Inc.

Outlook, Remains Stable

Affirmations:

Issuer: Staples, Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B1-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B1

RATINGS RATIONALE

Staples' credit profile considers the scale of its delivery-only
B2B business, loyal commercial relationships with high retention
rates, and well established supply chain and distribution
capabilities. Staples is constrained by continued weakness in
demand for core office products (53% of sales), its focus on
increasing scale in non-office ancillary products (the Pro segment)
that may include debt financed acquisitions, high leverage and
risks inherent in a sponsor-owned company, including potential for
leveraging extractions of equity.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation for EBITDA growth
from recent acquisitions and margin improvement on relatively flat
core sales, and that a portion of free cash flow will be used to
reduce debt resulting in improving credit metrics over the next
year. Pro-forma leverage for the dividend recap is high, but
Moody's expects that it will drop below the 5.5x downgrade trigger
over the next 12 months.

The ratings could be upgraded if the operating outlook is stable,
debt/EBITDA can be sustained below 4.5x and EBITA/interest above
3x, and financial policies are supportive of maintaining credit
metrics at these levels.

The ratings could be downgraded if operating profit deteriorates
meaningfully or debt/EBITDA is sustained above 5.5x or
EBITA/Interest trends toward 2.0x

Staples, Inc., headquartered in Framingham, MA, is a
business-to-business distributor of office supplies, and ancillary
products and services selling to corporate customers in North
America and Canada. The company's sells through three channels -
Staples Business Advantage serving principally large corporations;
Quill.com, a higher touch offering serving small to mid-market
businesses and consumers; and Staples.com serving small businesses
and consumers. Annual revenue exceeded $10.7 billion in the latest
fiscal year ended February 2, 2019. The company was acquired and
taken private by affiliates of Sycamore Partners, a private equity
company, in September 2017.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Distribution &
Supply Chain Services Industry published in June 2018.


SURGERY CENTER: S&P Rates $430MM Unsec. Notes Refinancing 'CCC'
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'CCC' issue-level rating and '6'
recovery rating to Surgery Center Holdings Inc.'s announced $430
million senior unsecured notes refinancing. The company will use
the proceeds to repurchase its $400 million senior unsecured notes
due in 2021 and for fees and prepayment penalties. The proposed
offering will extend the notes' maturity to 2027. In addition, the
company upsized its (currently undrawn) senior secured revolving
credit facility by $45 million to $120 million in total.

S&P's '6' recovery rating indicates expectations for negligible
(0%-10%) recovery in a default and results in a 'CCC' senior
unsecured issue rating, which is two notches below the 'B-' issuer
credit rating on parent Surgery Partners Inc. In addition, this
transaction provides slightly more unsecured support to the senior
secured debt, so S&P is updating the rounded estimate for the
senior secured tranche to 60% from 55%.

S&P's 'B-' issuer credit rating on Surgery Partners is based on its
expectations of free cash flow deficits in 2019 after distributions
to noncontrolling interest holders and very high adjusted leverage
of about 10x excluding preferred equity and about 12x including
preferred equity. The stable outlook reflects the rating agency's
expectations for low-single-digit percentage organic revenue growth
aided by better physician recruitment and facility utilization. S&P
also anticipates revenue growth will be supplemented by the
company's ongoing acquisition strategy. S&P believes revenue growth
and reduced expenses of $15 million or more from integration and
restructuring costs and cutbacks of underperforming physicians will
improve results in 2019 and 2020.

"We also expect the company to benefit from favorable industry
trends of patients and payer preference for certain outpatient
procedures due to lower costs and convenience. Technology
advancements enable more procedures to be performed outside of the
hospital setting. However, our view of the business continues to
reflect its narrow operating focus in a highly fragmented and
competitive industry subject to ongoing reimbursement pressure,"
S&P said.

  RATINGS LIST

  Ratings Unchanged
  Surgery Partners Inc.
   Issuer Credit Rating       B-/Stable/--

  New Rating
  Surgery Center Holdings Inc.
   Senior Unsecured
    $430 mil notes            CCC
     Recovery Rating          6(0%)


TEMPEST GROUP: April 30 Plan Confirmation Hearing
-------------------------------------------------
The Amended Disclosure Statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan
filed by Tempest Group, LLC, is approved.

On April 30, 2019, at 1:30 P.M., a plan confirmation hearing for
the Amended Plan filed by the Debtor at Document No. 159 is
scheduled in Courtroom B, 54th Floor, U.S. Steel Tower, 600 Grant
Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15219.

April 23, 2019, is the last day for f iling written ballots by
creditors, either accepting or rejecting the plan and for filing
and serving written objections to confirmation of the plan.

                     About Tempest Group

Tempest Group, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 16-24204) on November 10,
2016.  In the petition signed by Joann Jenkins, manager, the Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities of less than $1 million.  

Judge Carlota M. Bohm presides over the case.  The Debtor hired
Calaiaro Valencik as its legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed.


TPE INDUSTRIES: Automation Has $335K Accounts Receivables at Feb.28
-------------------------------------------------------------------
T.P. Automation, LLC, a subsidiary of TPE Industries, Inc., filed a
plan of reorganization and accompanying disclosure statement.

The Debtor's personal property includes funds held in the Debtor's
business accounts in
amount of $7,286.07 as of February 28, 2019. As of that date, the
Debtor have a total amount of $334,604.00 in account receivables.

Class 2, General Unsecured Claims, shall receive full payment of
their Allowed Claims over the life of the Plan with no interest. In
the alternative, the unsecured creditors may elect to receive
payment of 30% of their Allowed Claims within sixty (60) days of
the Effective Date of the Plan.

Class 1, Secured Claims of Somerset Trust Company, will be
bifurcated into (a) a term portion, which will be $2,000,000
amortized over 20 years at 6% per annum interest, with a balloon
payment due at the end of seven year after the Effective Date and
(b) the balance of the Class 1 Claim will remain a revolving line
of credit that shall be paid in the ordinary course of business
pursuant to the revolving line of credit agreement.

TPE Industries, Inc. holds 100% equity interest in the Debtor. TPE
Industries, Inc. will retain its equity interest and all rights in
the Debtor.

The Plan will be funded by the revenue stream generated by the
Debtor in the ordinary course of business.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 20, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y62q8nd3from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                  About TPE Industries Inc.

TPE Industries, Inc. -- http://www.tpelectric.net/-- is a family
owned and operated company that provides engineering, design,
installation, construction and commissioning services.  TPE
Industries operates three separate operating divisions as follows:
TP Electric, Inc. (natural gas and oil division); TP Electric &
Power, LLC (industrial and commercial division) and TP Automation,
LLC (industrial automation, PLC's, instrumentation, gas and flame
detection).  The companies serve a wide range of clients and
industries that include natural gas and oil, hi-tech manufacturing,
water treatment facilities, wireless communications, chemical
manufacturing, power generation, power transmission,
telecommunications, metals manufacturing and mining & aggregate.
TPE Industries' main office is in Acme, Pennsylvania.

TPE Industries, Inc. and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case Nos.
18-23447 to 18-23450) on Aug. 30, 2018.  The cases are jointly
administered, with TPE Industries as the lead case.

In the petitions signed by Shawn T. Porter, president, the Debtors
disclosed these assets and liabilities:

                            Total        Total
                            Assets     Liabilities
                          -----------  -----------
TPE Industries, Inc.        $407,717      $339,387
T.P. Electric, Inc.       $2,393,042    $4,903,125
TP Automation, LLC          $219,970       $54,320

Judge Jeffery A. Deller presides over the case.  

Kirk B. Burkley, Esq., at Bernstein-Burkley, P.C., is the Debtor's
legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 cases.


TPE INDUSTRIES: Electric Settles $9-Mil. in Claims
--------------------------------------------------
T.P. Electric, Inc., a subsidiary of TPE Industries, Inc., filed a
plan of reorganization and accompanying disclosure statement.

The Debtor owns various vehicles that are encumbered secured lien
holders. The Debtor's vehicles have an estimated value of
$1,600,912.  The Debtor's personal property includes funds held in
the Debtor's business accounts in the total amount of $2,825,702.92
as of February 28, 2019.  As of this date, the Debtor have a total
amount of $718,605.66 in account receivables.

Class 3, General Unsecured Claims, shall receive full payment of
their Allowed Claims over the life of the Plan with no interest. In
the alternative, the unsecured creditors may elect to receive
payment of 30% of their Allowed Claims within sixty (60) days of
the Effective Date of the Plan.

Class 1, Secured Claims of Somerset Trust Company, will be
bifurcated into (a) a term portion, which will be $2,000,000
amortized over 20 years at 6% per annum interest, with a balloon
payment due at the end of seven year after the Effective Date and
(b) the balance of the Class 1 Claim will remain a revolving line
of credit that shall be paid in the ordinary course of business
pursuant to the revolving line of credit agreement.

Class 2, Other Allowed Secured Claims, constitute of all Secured
Claims against the Debtor’s assets, excluding Somerset Trust
Company. The holders of a Secured Allowed Claim hold a security in
the Debtor’s vehicles. Secured Allowed Claims shall be paid
pursuant to the holders’ respective security interest agreement
and/or promissory note.

TPE Industries, Inc., holds 100% equity interest in the Debtor. TPE
Industries, Inc. will retain its interest and all equity rights in
the Debtor.

Class 5, Settled Claims, include all claims settled by virtue of
the Order of Court entered on February 19, 2019, approving the
Settlement Motion.  Parties and their respective claims have been
fully satisfied and waived against the Estate and no further
payment is required.

The following parties and their claims have been fully satisfied
and waived against the Estate and no further payment is required:

   a. Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Claim in the amount of
$56,952.25 has been fully satisfied by direct payment from
MarkWest.

   b. Scott Electric Company, Claim No. 44 in the amount of
$635,641.23 has been fully satisfied by direct payment from
MarkWest in the total amount of $625,963.92.

   c. Mayer Electric, Inc., Claim in the amount of $44,690.02 has
been fully satisfied by direct payment from MarkWest.

   d. Local #141 Claimants, Claims No. 32-37 in the total amount of
$775,056.14 have been fully satisfied by direct payment from
MarkWest in the total amount of $774,842.06.

   e. SSSI, Inc., a/k/a Songer Services, Inc., a/k/a Songer Steel
Services, Inc., Claims No. 12-13 in the total amount of
$3,563,786.76 have been fully settled and waived against the
Debtors and the bankruptcy estates.

   f. MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P., the Debtors have waived all
claims against MarkWest related to the Project in exchange of
payment in the total amount of $4,000,000.00.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 20, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y5g3lsnhfrom PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                  About TPE Industries Inc.

TPE Industries, Inc. -- http://www.tpelectric.net/-- is a family
owned and operated company that provides engineering, design,
installation, construction and commissioning services.  TPE
Industries operates three separate operating divisions as follows:
TP Electric, Inc. (natural gas and oil division); TP Electric &
Power, LLC (industrial and commercial division) and TP Automation,
LLC (industrial automation, PLC's, instrumentation, gas and flame
detection).  The companies serve a wide range of clients and
industries that include natural gas and oil, hi-tech manufacturing,
water treatment facilities, wireless communications, chemical
manufacturing, power generation, power transmission,
telecommunications, metals manufacturing and mining & aggregate.
TPE Industries' main office is in Acme, Pennsylvania.

TPE Industries, Inc. and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case Nos.
18-23447 to 18-23450) on Aug. 30, 2018.  The cases are jointly
administered, with TPE Industries as the lead case.

In the petitions signed by Shawn T. Porter, president, the Debtors
disclosed these assets and liabilities:

                            Total        Total
                            Assets     Liabilities
                          -----------  -----------
TPE Industries, Inc.        $407,717      $339,387
T.P. Electric, Inc.       $2,393,042    $4,903,125
TP Automation, LLC          $219,970       $54,320

Judge Jeffery A. Deller presides over the case.  

Kirk B. Burkley, Esq., at Bernstein-Burkley, P.C., is the Debtor's
legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 cases.


TPE INDUSTRIES: Power to Expects to Pay $292K on Effective Date
---------------------------------------------------------------
TP Electric & Power, LLC, a subsidiary of TPE Industries, Inc.,
filed a plan of reorganization and accompanying disclosure
statement.

The Debtor's sole assets is account receivables. As February 28,
2019, the Debtor have
account receivables in the total amount of $781,748.00.

On the the Effective Date, the Debtor expects to pay $292,750.69,
composed of $292,425.69 to administrative claims and $325 to U.S.
Trustee fees.

Class 2, General Unsecured Claims, shall receive full payment of
their Allowed Claims over the life of the Plan with no interest. In
the alternative, the unsecured creditors may elect to receive
payment of 30% of their Allowed Claims within sixty (60) days of
the Effective Date of the Plan.

Class 1, Secured Claims of Somerset Trust Company, shall be
bifurcated into (a) a term portion, which will be $2,000,000
amortized over 20 years at 6% per annum interest, with a balloon
payment due at the end of seven year after the Effective Date and
(b) the balance of the Class 1 Claim will remain a revolving line
of credit that shall be paid in the ordinary course of business
pursuant to the revolving line of credit agreement.

TPE Industries, Inc. holds 100% equity interest in the Debtor. TPE
Industries, Inc. will retain its interest and all rights in the
Debtor.

The Plan will be funded by the revenue stream generated by the
Debtor in the ordinary course of business.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 20, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y2qtw4tnfrom PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                  About TPE Industries Inc.

TPE Industries, Inc. -- http://www.tpelectric.net/-- is a family
owned and operated company that provides engineering, design,
installation, construction and commissioning services.  TPE
Industries operates three separate operating divisions as follows:
TP Electric, Inc. (natural gas and oil division); TP Electric &
Power, LLC (industrial and commercial division) and TP Automation,
LLC (industrial automation, PLC's, instrumentation, gas and flame
detection).  The companies serve a wide range of clients and
industries that include natural gas and oil, hi-tech manufacturing,
water treatment facilities, wireless communications, chemical
manufacturing, power generation, power transmission,
telecommunications, metals manufacturing and mining & aggregate.
TPE Industries' main office is in Acme, Pennsylvania.

TPE Industries, Inc. and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case Nos.
18-23447 to 18-23450) on Aug. 30, 2018.  The cases are jointly
administered, with TPE Industries as the lead case.

In the petitions signed by Shawn T. Porter, president, the Debtors
disclosed these assets and liabilities:

                            Total        Total
                            Assets     Liabilities
                          -----------  -----------
TPE Industries, Inc.        $407,717      $339,387
T.P. Electric, Inc.       $2,393,042    $4,903,125
TP Automation, LLC          $219,970       $54,320

Judge Jeffery A. Deller presides over the case.  

Kirk B. Burkley, Esq., at Bernstein-Burkley, P.C., is the Debtor's
legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 cases.


TPE INDUSTRIES: Unsecured Creditors to Get $59K Over 3 Years
------------------------------------------------------------
TPE Industries, Inc., filed a plan of reorganization and
accompanying disclosure statement.

TPE is the parent company to TP Electric, Inc., TP Electric &
Power, LLC, TP Automation, LLC, and TP Payroll Services, LLC.  TPE
is the sole member/shareholder of the Subsidiaries.

The Debtor's personal property includes funds held in the Debtor's
business accounts in amount of $966,358.48 as of February 28, 2019.


With regards to General Unsecured Creditors, quarterly payments
will be distributed in the total amount of approximately $59,000
for three years. Quarterly payments will be distributed on the 5th
day of each quarter.  January 5, 2022 is the estimated date of last
payment under the proposed Plan. The Plan will be fund by the
settlement funds received by Electric and revenue to will be
generate by the Debtors in the ordinary course of business.

Equity Security Holders Shawn T. Porter and Thomas H. Porter will
retain their equity interest and all rights in the Debtor.

The following executory contracts shall be assumed on the Effective
Date of the Plan unless the executory contract is specifically
rejected prior to the Court entering an order confirming the Plan.

   i. Lease of four (4) Dodge 2017 Trucks. Enterprise FM Trust is
the opposing party of the lease agreement.

  ii. Month to Month Lease for the business property located at
3252 State Route 31, Acme, PA 15610. Shawn T. Power and Thomas H.
Porter are the opposing parties of the lease agreement.

iii. Month to Month Lease for the rental of warehouse located at
Stahstown, Pennsylvania. Thomas H. Proper is the opposing party of
the lease agreement.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 20, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y5nnehfgfrom PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                  About TPE Industries Inc.

TPE Industries, Inc. -- http://www.tpelectric.net/-- is a family
owned and operated company that provides engineering, design,
installation, construction and commissioning services.  TPE
Industries operates three separate operating divisions as follows:
TP Electric, Inc. (natural gas and oil division); TP Electric &
Power, LLC (industrial and commercial division) and TP Automation,
LLC (industrial automation, PLC's, instrumentation, gas and flame
detection).  The companies serve a wide range of clients and
industries that include natural gas and oil, hi-tech manufacturing,
water treatment facilities, wireless communications, chemical
manufacturing, power generation, power transmission,
telecommunications, metals manufacturing and mining & aggregate.
TPE Industries' main office is in Acme, Pennsylvania.

TPE Industries, Inc. and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case Nos.
18-23447 to 18-23450) on Aug. 30, 2018.  The cases are jointly
administered, with TPE Industries as the lead case.

In the petitions signed by Shawn T. Porter, president, the Debtors
disclosed these assets and liabilities:

                            Total        Total
                            Assets     Liabilities
                          -----------  -----------
TPE Industries, Inc.        $407,717      $339,387
T.P. Electric, Inc.       $2,393,042    $4,903,125
TP Automation, LLC          $219,970       $54,320

Judge Jeffery A. Deller presides over the case.  

Kirk B. Burkley, Esq., at Bernstein-Burkley, P.C., is the Debtor's
legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 cases.


TREASURE ISLES: Taps HeplerBroom as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
Treasure Isles Inc. received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Illinois to hire HeplerBroom,
LLC, as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor with respect to matters in
litigation affecting the continued operation of its business;
assist in the preparation and implementation of a bankruptcy plan;
represent the Debtor in connection with actions under Chapter 5 of
the Bankruptcy Code; and provide other legal services in connection
with its Chapter 11 case.

HeplerBroom will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Steven Wallace     $350
     Amanda McQuaid     $175

Steven Wallace, Esq., at HeplerBroom, disclosed in a court filing
that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Steven M. Wallace, Esq.
     HeplerBroom, LLC
     130 N Main St
     P.O. Box 510
     Edwardsville, IL 62025
     Tel: (618) 307-1185
          (618) 656-0184
     Fax: (855) 656-1364
     Email: steven.wallace@heplerbroom.com

                     About Treasure Isles Inc.

Treasure Isles, Inc., is a privately held company that operates in
the food and beverages industry.

Treasure Isles sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Ill. Case No. 19-30269) on March 7, 2019.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $1
million and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  The case is
assigned to Judge Laura K. Grandy.  HeplerBroom, LLC, is the
Debtor's counsel.



TRUE SECURITY: Taps Wadsworth Garber as New Bankruptcy Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
True Security, Inc. received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Colorado to hire Wadsworth Garber Warner
Conrardy, P.C., as its new bankruptcy counsel.

The Debtor previously employed Buechler & Garber LLC as counsel,
with Aaron Garber, Esq., as the primary attorney.  On March 1, Mr.
Garber relocated to Wadsworth.  

Wadsworth will assist the Debtor in the preparation of a plan of
reorganization and will provide other legal services in connection
with its Chapter 11 case.

Mr. Garber, a shareholder of Wadsworth, disclosed in a court filing
that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Aaron A. Garber, Esq.
     Wadsworth Garber Warner Conrardy, P.C.
     2580 W. Main Street, Suite 200
     Littleton, CO 80120
     Telephone: 303-296-1999
     Fax: 303-296-7600
     Email: agarber@wgwc-law.com

                        About True Security

True Security, Inc., provides security services in the Denver-metro
area.  

True Security filed its voluntary petition pursuant to Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 18-17887) on Sept.
7, 2018.  In the petition signed by CEO Thomas Dearagonaise, the
Debtor estimated $50,001 to $100,000 in assets and $100,001 to
$500,000 in estimated liabilities.  

The Debtor previously employed Buechler & Garber LLC as counsel,
with Aaron Garber, Esq., as the primary attorney.  It later hired
Wadsworth Garber Warner Conrardy, P.C., as its new bankruptcy
counsel, after Mr. Garber relocated to Wadsworth.



VEROBLUE FARMS: April 17 Plan Confirmation Hearing
--------------------------------------------------
The Modified Disclosure Statement explaining the Modified Chapter
11 Plan filed by VeroBlue Farms USA, Inc., and its affiliated
debtors, is approved.

A Final confirmation hearing shall be held on April 17, 2019 at
10:00 a.m. in the Bankruptcy Courtroom located in the United States
Courthouse, Sixth Floor, 111 7th Avenue SE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
52401.

April 12, 2019 is fixed as the last day for filing written
acceptances or rejections of the plan and the last day for filing
and serving  written objections to confirmation of the plan.

A full-text copy of the Modified Disclosure Statement is available
at https://tinyurl.com/y4wbfgfk from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

              About Veroblue Farms USA Inc.

Headquartered in Webster City, Iowa, VeroBlue Farms USA, Inc. --
http://verobluefarms.com/-- operates a fish farm specializing in
Barramundi, a freshwater fish found in the Indo-Pacific waters of
Australia. It created an innovative aquaculture system that
utilizes the natural elements of air, water and care.

VeroBlue Farms USA, Inc., VBF Operations Inc., VBF Transport Inc.,
VBF IP Inc., and Iowa's First Inc. sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Iowa Lead Case No. 18-01297)
on Sept. 21, 2018. In the petitions signed by Norman McCowan,
president, VeroBlue estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of $50 million to $100 million.

The Debtors tapped Elderkin & Pirnie, PLC and Ag & Business Legal
Strategies, P.C. as their legal counsel; and Alex Moglia and his
firm Moglia Advisors as chief restructuring officer.

On October 24, 2018, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained
Goldstein & McClintock LLLP as its counsel.


VPH PHARMACY: Court Junks Deven Patel Bid for TRO vs Citibank
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned DEVEN PATEL, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK CORP.,
Defendant, Civil Case No. 18-13996 (E.D. Mich.), District Judge
Linda V. Parker entered an order denying Plaintiff's motion for
temporary restraining order.

This lawsuit arises from Defendant Citibank's actions to recover a
debt from Plaintiff Deven Patel, which has allegedly caused a
reduction of Plaintiff's credit score and credit limits and has
impaired his ability to conduct business. Plaintiff alleges that
Defendant's actions have violated the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. section 1692 et seq., the Fair Credit
Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. section 1681 et seq., and the Michigan
Consumer Collection Practices Act, Mich. Comp. Additionally,
Plaintiff alleges against Defendant a claim of intentional
infliction of emotional distress.

Plaintiff held a credit card with Defendant Citibank and claims to
have made timely payments toward the card for the full amount due.
Following the filing of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy by VPH Pharmacy,
Inc., of which Plaintiff is the principal, Defendant settled with a
bankruptcy trustee whereby the trustee had Defendant reimburse the
Debtor for items and services purchased using Plaintiff's credit
card. Defendant settled with the trustee to reimburse the Debtor
for $90,000. In seeking recoupment, Defendant placed the $90,000
amount on Plaintiff's credit card bill. Although Plaintiff has made
attempts to dispute this, Defendant has continued to seek
recoupment of the debt and continued reporting the debt to the
three major credit agencies resulting in a reduction in Plaintiff's
credit score, credit limits, and ability to conduct business.
Plaintiff requests that this Court issue a TRO to enjoin Defendant
from further debt collection activities.

The court must consider the following factors when considering
whether to issue a TRO or preliminary injunction: (1) whether the
movant has a strong likelihood of success on the merits; (2)
whether the movant would suffer irreparable injury absent an
injunction; (3) whether granting the injunction will cause
substantial harm to others; and (4) whether the public interest is
served by issuance of the injunction.

The Court finds the second factor -- whether the movant would
suffer irreparable injury absent an injunction -- dispositive.
Plaintiff contends that injunctive relief is necessary to prevent
further and continual harm to his credit score, credit limits, and
ability to conduct business caused by Defendant's debt collection
and debt reporting efforts.

The Court finds that, under the circumstances, corrective relief
and monetary damages are the most likely remedy if Plaintiff
succeeds in this litigation. If Plaintiff's claims are found
meritorious, Defendant may be directed to cancel the debt and no
longer pursue any debt collection activities. In turn, this would
alleviate the harm to Plaintiff's credit score and credit card
limits. Any further harm to Plaintiff -- e.g., the harm to his
ability to conduct business or the loss of business and/or
financial opportunities -- can be quantified and awarded in
monetary damages. Thus, this factor weighs heavily against any
grant of injunctive relief.

The very harm that Plaintiff seeks to correct and/or prevent is one
not recognized by this Court as irreparable. Consequently,
Plaintiff has failed to establish a factor necessary for the
Court's grant of a TRO. Therefore, the Court denies Plaintiff's
motion.

A copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated Feb. 1, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2WrXpAm from Leagle.com.

Deven Patel, Plaintiff, represented by Saif R. Kasmikha , Midwest
Legal Partners, LLC.

CitiBank Corp., Defendant, represented by Laura Baucus --
lbaucus@dykema.com -- Dykema Gossett & Samantha L. Walls --
swalls@dykema.com -- Dykema Gossett PLLC.

                  About VPH Pharmacy, Inc.

VPH Pharmacy, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
E.D. Mich. Case No. 17-30077) on January 13, 2017. The Hon. Daniel
S. Opperman presides over the case.

The Dragich Law Firm PLLC represents the Debtor as counsel. Dalto
Consulting, Inc. is the Debtor's financial advisor.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
both assets and liabilities. The petition was signed by Amee Patel,
attorney in fact for Devenkumar C. Patel, sole shareholder.

The U.S. trustee for Region 9 on March 3 appointed three creditors
of VPH Pharmacy, Inc., to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors.


WALKER MANAGEMENT: Ruling in Favor of Ambrosio Defendants Flipped
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned MICHAEL VANCE, LORI VANCE, and WALKER
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JOAN SCERBO,
Personal representative of the Estate of GABRIEL AMBROSIO, ESQ.,
ANTHONY P. AMBROSIO, ESQ., LAW OFFICE OF JOHN T. AMBROSIO, AMBROSIO
& TOMCZAK, and LAW OFFICE OF ANTHONY P. AMBROSIO, Defendants, and
JOHN T. AMBROSIO, ESQ. and AMBROSIO & ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Defendants-Respondents, Docket No. A-2019-17T4 (N.J. Super. App.
Div.), Plaintiffs Michael Vance, Lori Vance, and Walker Management
Systems, Inc. appeal from the Law Division's Dec. 7, 2017 order
granting summary judgment to defendants John Ambrosio, Esq. and
Ambrosio & Associates, LLC and dismissing their legal malpractice
complaint with prejudice.

Upon review, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
reverses and remands.

The facts underlying the legal malpractice action stem from a
dispute over a contract to purchase assets and customers lists for
a solid waste collection business. In March 2009, Meadowbrook
Industries, LLC and Walker, both licensed solid waste collection
utilities, entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement in which
Meadowbrook agreed to acquire substantially all of Walker's solid
waste collector assets, including Walker's physical equipment and
customer lists. The APA also contained a restrictive covenant
preventing Walker, Lori Vance, and Michael Vance from competing
with Meadowbrook for a period of five years. At the time of the
transaction, plaintiff Lori Vance was the sole owner of Walker.

On Sept. 1, 2009, Meadowbrook filed a complaint against Walker,
Lori Vance, and Michael Vance, alleging breach of contract and
violation of restrictive covenant provisions of the APA. The Court
concluded that the doctrine of unclean hands barred Walker from
arguing that the APA was rendered illegal by the failure to obtain
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) approval.
For these reasons, the Court affirmed the judgment in favor of
Meadowbrook.

On Oct. 31, 2016, Michael Vance, Lori Vance, and Walker filed a
complaint against the estate of Gabriel Ambrosio, Anthony Ambrosio,
John Ambrosio and each of the attorney's law firms, alleging four
counts: (1) professional negligence/malpractice and simple
negligence; (2) breach of contract/covenant of good faith and fair
dealing; (3) breach of fiduciary duty; and (4) loss of consortium.
Plaintiffs alleged that defendants failed to argue the proper
theory of fraud in the Meadowbrook action when opposing summary
judgment. Lori Vance affirms that despite her requests to do so,
defendants failed to argue that Meadowbrook's fraudulent failure to
disclose that it could not service the State contracts voided the
APA from its inception. Plaintiffs aver that John Ambrosio told
them not to pursue this theory because it was "simpler to keep one
defense and . . . if the contract is illegal, nothing else
matters." Plaintiffs assert that the motion court would not have
granted summary judgment in the Meadowbrook action had defendants
raised their preferred theory of fraud. Following oral argument on
December 1, 2017, the trial court rendered an oral opinion granting
summary judgment in favor of the Ambrosio defendants. The trial
judge found that plaintiffs had not advanced a plausible theory
that the contract would have been void on the basis of fraud.
Plaintiffs appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment.

Following oral argument on Dec. 1, 2017, the trial court rendered
an oral opinion granting summary judgment in favor of the Ambrosio
defendants.

In response, the Ambrosio defendants contend, among other things,
that the trial court properly granted summary judgment because
plaintiffs presented insufficient evidence to support their
assertion that they would have been successful on their preferred
theory of fraud.

The Ambrosio defendants argue that summary judgment was properly
granted because plaintiffs were barred from arguing their preferred
theory of fraud by the doctrine of unclean hands. The Court rejects
this argument.

In Meadowbrook, this court determined that the doctrine of unclean
hands barred Walker from arguing that the APA should be declared
illegal because the parties failed to obtain DEP approval for the
transaction. In this regard, we reasoned "having failed to
discharge its obligation to comply with the requirements of
N.J.S.A. 48:3-7(c)(1), Walker seeks to exploit that failure,
arguing that the APA should be declared illegal, unenforceable and
against public policy precisely because there was no compliance
with that statute."

In this respect, the Court's holding in Meadowbrook only applied
the doctrine of unclean hands to bar the specific argument that the
contract was rendered illegal by the failure to obtain DEP
approval. By contrast, in this case, plaintiffs advance the theory
the APA was void from its inception due to Meadowbrook's fraudulent
omission of the "pay-to-play" ban. Although the Ambrosio defendants
argue that plaintiffs engaged in inequitable conduct in failing to
obtain DEP approval, the record does not establish that plaintiffs
would have uncovered the "pay-to-play" issue had they sought DEP
approval for the transaction. On the record before the Court,
therefore, the Court cannot conclude that plaintiffs would have
been barred from arguing that Meadowbrook committed legal or
equitable fraud by the doctrine of unclean hands.

In conclusion, when viewing the evidence in the light most
favorable to plaintiffs, the Court finds that plaintiffs have
presented a prima facie claim of legal malpractice and find that
the trial court improvidently granted summary judgment.

A copy of the Court's Opinion dated Feb. 4, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2HIRlQW from Leagle.com.

David A. Berlin argued the cause for appellants (Weisberg Law,
attorneys; Matthew B. Weisberg, on the briefs).

Cathleen Kelly Rebar, argued the cause for respondents (Rebar
Bernstiel, attorneys; Cathleen Kelly Rebar, of counsel; Jeannie
Park Lee, on the brief).


WAYNE BAILEY: Court Allows Objection to Kornegay's PACA Claim
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse entered an order allowing
Debtor Wayne Bailey, Inc.'s objection to the Perishable
Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA) Claim of Kornegay Family
Produce, LLC.

In its PACA Claim, filed on May 29, 2018, Kornegay initially
asserted a claim in the amount of $52,184.29 and contended that
this full amount was entitled to statutory trust protection
pursuant to PACA. Kornegay's Amended PACA Claim asserts a PACA
claim in the amount of $53,428.23. In its Objection, the debtor
contends that the Invoices provided for payment terms in excess of
the statutory maximum, such that Kornegay's claims are not entitled
to PACA trust protection. Although the debtor's Objection
originally disputed the PACA eligibility of Kornegay's entire
claim, the parties agreed to an allowed PACA claim in the amount of
$30,308.53 and agreed that an additional sum of $8,201.99 should
not be afforded PACA protection but be allowed as an unsecured
claim. Remaining for the court's determination is the PACA
eligibility of three invoices: (1) Invoice #17362 in the amount of
$5,224.16, which lists a ship date of August 2, 2016 and an invoice
date of Sept. 20, 2016; (2) Invoice #17376 in the amount of $5,072,
which lists a ship date of August 10, 2016 and an invoice date of
Sept. 20, 2016; and (3) Invoice #17442 in the amount of $4,422.84,
which lists a ship date of Sept. 21, 2016 and an invoice date of
Nov. 12, 2016.

Kornegay contends that the Disputed Invoices are PACA eligible
because: (1) the parties orally or implicitly agreed to a 30-day
payment term, which is within the statutory limit; and (2) based on
a 30-day payment term, the dates of the Disputed Invoices gave the
debtor timely notice of Kornegay's intent to preserve its PACA
trust rights as required by 7 C.F.R. section 46.2(aa).3 Kornegay
further contends that a grower need only substantially, rather than
strictly, comply with PACA to enjoy the benefits of the statutory
trust.

To the contrary, the debtor asserts that the parties did not have
any written pre-transaction, pre-default agreement, and as a
result, the court must impose the statutory default payment term of
ten days. Using a ten-day payment term, the debtor contends the
notice provided by the Disputed Invoices was untimely.

Accordingly, two issues are before the court: (1) whether a
pre-transaction, pre-default oral agreement or "course of dealings"
between parties is sufficient to extend a PACA payment term; and
(2) whether Kornegay timely sent the Disputed Invoice, which
contained the required PACA language.

When the policy of strict compliance is considered with the plain
language of the statute and regulations, it is clear that a
pre-transaction, pre-default oral agreement to extend PACA payment
terms should not be considered when calculating the notice period
for PACA eligibility. Absent a written agreement stating otherwise,
a court must impose the default payment term of ten days as
prescribed by the Secretary of Agriculture. Because no written
agreement existed between the parties, the default payment term of
ten days governed the 2016 transactions.

Kornegay employed the invoice notice method to preserve its PACA
rights pursuant to 7 C.F.R. section 46.46(f)(3), and the Disputed
Invoices contained the statutorily required language. An invoice
notice must be sent "within thirty calendar days" after the
expiration of the underlying payment term. In this case, based upon
a ten-day payment term, all three of the Disputed Invoices were
untimely pursuant to the following calculations:

(1) Invoice #17362 in the amount of $5,224.16, which lists a ship
date of August 2, 2016, such that the invoice must have been sent
within thirty days of August 12, 2016 i.e., Sept. 11, 2016. Invoice
#17362 was not submitted to the debtor until Sept. 20, 2018 and was
therefore untimely.

(2) Invoice #17376 in the amount of $5,072.00, which lists a ship
date of August 10, 2016, such that the invoice must have been sent
within thirty days of August 20, 2016 i.e., Sept. 19, 2016. Invoice
#17376 was not submitted to the debtor until Sept. 20, 2018 and was
therefore untimely.

(3) Invoice #17442 in the amount of $4,422.84, which lists a ship
date of Sept. 21, 2016, such that the invoice must have been sent
within thirty days of Oct. 1, 2016 i.e., Oct. 21, 2016. Invoice
#17442 was not submitted to the debtor until Nov. 12, 2018 and was
therefore untimely.

The fact that Kornegay otherwise complied with PACA's many other
requirements is immaterial as to the timeliness of its notice to
preserve PACA trust rights.

The debtor's Objection to the PACA Claim of Kornegay is, therefore,
allowed.

The bankruptcy case is in re: WAYNE BAILEY, INC., Chapter 11,
Debtor, Case No. 18-00284-5-SWH (Bankr. E.D.N.C.).

A copy of the Court's Order dated Feb. 1, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2uvYHyy from Leagle.com

Wayne Bailey, Inc., Debtor, represented by Laurie B. Biggs , Stubbs
& Perdue, PA, Gregory B. Crampton , Nicholls & Crampton, P.A.,
Joseph Zachary Frost , Stubbs & Perdue, P.A. & Trawick H. Stubbs,
Jr. , Stubbs & Perdue, P.A..

               About Wayne Bailey, Inc.

Wayne Bailey, Inc., grows, packs, and ships sweet potatoes for
foodservice, retail, fresh cut, processing, and international
markets worldwide.  It also offers processed sweet potatoes,
including shreds, sticks, diced, sliced (with or without skin),
slabs (with or without skin), crinkle-cut slabs (with or without
skin), and whole peeled and puree (chilled or frozen) sweet
potatoes.  The company was founded in 1935 and is headquartered in
Chadbourn, North Carolina.  It has facilities in North Carolina,
Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas.

Wayne Bailey filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on (Bankr.
E.D.N.C. Case No. 18-00284) on January 21, 2018, listing its
estimated assets and liabilities at $10 million to $50 million
respectively. The petition was signed by George G. Wooten,
president.

Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse presides over the case.


WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL: Completes Sale of Land Drilling Rigs
---------------------------------------------------------------
Weatherford International plc has completed the sale of two land
drilling rigs that were relocated in Algeria and has delivered two
idle land drilling rigs from Iraq.  The Company received $10
million in cash for each of the land drilling rigs relocated in
Algeria and an additional $12 million in cash for the delivery of
two idle land drilling rigs outside of Iraq, for aggregate proceeds
of $32 million.

In July 2018, a subsidiary of Weatherford signed definitive
agreements with ADES International Holding PLC for the sale of
Weatherford's land drilling rig operations in Algeria, Kuwait and
Saudi Arabia as well as two idle land rigs in Iraq, for an
aggregate cash purchase price of $287.5 million.  The Transaction
includes 31 land drilling rigs and related drilling contracts, as
well as approximately 2,300 employees and contract personnel.

These transactions are the last in a series that were subject to
regulatory approvals, consents and other customary closing
conditions.  In December 2018, the Company announced the closing of
its Precision Drilling Services Saudi Arabia land drilling
operations for $92.5 million in cash.  In November 2018, the
Company announced the closing of its Kuwait land drilling rigs sale
for $123 million in cash, and an additional $12 million to be
received in equal $6 million increments upon the delivery of two
idle land drilling rigs from Iraq.  In February 2019, the Company
announced the completion of the sale of four contracted drilling
rigs in Algeria for $40 million in cash.  In total, the Company has
received aggregate proceeds of $287.5 million that it has already
used or intends to use to reduce its debt.

                        About Weatherford

Weatherford (NYSE: WFT), an Irish public limited company and Swiss
tax resident -- http://www.weatherford.com/-- is a multinational
oilfield service company providing innovative solutions, technology
and services to the oil and gas industry.  The Company operates in
over 80 countries and has a network of approximately 700
locations,
including manufacturing, service, research and development, and
training facilities and employs approximately 26,500 people.

Weatherford reported a net loss attributable to the company of
$2.81 billion for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net
loss attributable to the company of $2.81 billion for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, Weatherford had $6.60
billion in total assets, $10.26 billion in total liabilities, and a
total shareholders' deficiency of $3.66 billion.

Weatherford's credit ratings have been downgraded by multiple
credit rating agencies and these agencies could further downgrade
the Company's credit ratings.  On Dec. 24, 2018, S&P Global Ratings
downgraded the Company's senior unsecured notes to CCC- from CCC+,
with a negative outlook.  Weatherford's issuer credit rating was
lowered to CCC from B-.  On Dec. 20, 2018, Moody's Investors
Services downgraded the Company's credit rating on its senior
unsecured notes to Caa3 from Caa1 and its speculative grade
liquidity rating to SGL-4 from SGL-3, both with a negative
outlook.

The Company said its non-investment grade status may limit its
ability to refinance its existing debt, could cause it to refinance
or issue debt with less favorable and more restrictive terms and
conditions, and could increase certain fees and interest rates of
its borrowings.  Suppliers and financial institutions may lower or
eliminate the level of credit provided through payment terms or
intraday funding when dealing with the Company thereby increasing
the need for higher levels of cash on hand, which would decrease
the Company's ability to repay debt balances, negatively affect its
cash flow and impact its access to the inventory and services
needed to operate its business.


WESTERN HOST: Wants to Use Insurance Proceeds for Hotel Repairs
---------------------------------------------------------------
Western Host Associates, Inc., requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Puerto Rico to authorize the use of the
insurance proceeds.

The Debtor proposes to use $633,806 in order to repair the damages
caused by the hurricanes and start operating so it can generate the
income necessary to make payments to its creditors and obligations,
and avoid the continuance of immediate and irreparable harm to the
estate. The Debtor estimates the costs of repairs amounts to
approximately $901,119.

Pre-petition, the Debtor entered into various loan agreements with
Westernbank Puerto Rico, from whom Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
obtained the loans, then later on, Triangle Cayman Asset Company 2
obtained the loans.

Triangle holds a secured interest over Debtor's property for a
commercial loan debt. The loan is secured by a real estate
collateral. The Debtor asserts, however, that Triangle has a right
of cash collateral only over the structure located at Old San Juan,
San Jose Street 202, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901. Triangle has no
cash collateral right over the rents generated from the rooms of
the Hotel, no cash collateral right over the business interruption,
and no cash collateral right over the inventory. In its Schedule D,
the Debtor included Capital Crossing, which is Triangle's servicing
company, with a secured debt over that property in the amount of
$3.9 million.

On November 2017, the Debtor filed its claim with Integrand
Assurance to claim its structural damages, inventory damages, and
business interruption. The Debtor also requested a loan through
Small Business Administration which was denied. Once the claim over
the property was partially approved, as expressed before, Integrand
sent a check in the amount of $250,000 on January 2018 to the order
of Western Host Associates and Capital Crossing -- Triangle's
servicing company.

On the meeting between Debtor and Capital Crossing, they stated
that the only way they would endorse the check was if they had full
control over proceeds of such check. Since no agreement was
reached, the check was sent back to Integrand Assurance, but Debtor
afterwards sent various offers to Capital Crossing.

On Dec. 27, 2018, Integrand Assurance consigned the amount of
$721,112, which is composed of $633,806 for structural damages and
inventory loss for $87,306. As evidenced in the case, and expressed
by Integrand Assurance in the hearing held on Dec. 13, 2018,
Triangle has a right of cash collateral over the amount of $633,806
but not over the amount of $87,306 which is for inventory loss.
Triangle has no cash collateral right over the inventory.

Triangle argued that they should receive all the amount of the
insurance proceeds because of a mortgage deed signed stating that
they have the right where those insurance proceeds should be
applied. Nevertheless, the Debtor asserts (1) Triangle has no right
to all the amount of the $721,112 because, as expressed, the amount
of $87,306 are from inventory loss to which Triangle has no cash
collateral right; and (2) the amount of $633,806 should be used for
its purpose which is to repair the damages suffered because of
hurricane Maria.

Accordingly, the Debtor requests the Court to allow the use of cash
collateral. In exchange to its use of cash collateral, the Debtor
proposes to provide monthly payments of $4,000 to Triangle as
adequate protection.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb18-02696-117.pdf

                About Western Host Associates

Western Host Associates, Inc., owns a four-story commercial hotel
building located at 202 San Jose Street, Old San Juan, Puerto
Rico.

The hotel is currently non-operational and is valued by the company
at $1.35 million.

The company previously sought bankruptcy protection on Nov. 14,
2012 (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 12-09093) and on May 19, 2011 (Bankr.
D.P.R. Case No. 11-04152).

Western Host Associates sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 18-02696) on May 15, 2018.
In the petition signed by Luis Alvarez, president, the Debtor
disclosed $1.36 million in assets and $4.82 million in
liabilities.

Judge Brian K. Tester oversees the case.  

The Debtor tapped Gratacos Law Firm, PSC, as its legal counsel and
the Law Offices of Jose R. Olmo-Rodriguez, as special counsel.


WET SEAL: Oak Point Buying Remnant Assets for $20K
--------------------------------------------------
The Wet Seal, and its debtor-affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to authorize the private sale of
remnant assets, consisting of known or unknown assets, claims, or
property rights, which have not been previously sold, assigned, or
transferred, to Oak Point Partners, LLC or assigns for $20,000,
free and clear of all liens, claims, interests, and encumbrances.

The Debtors commenced these Chapter 11 Cases to implement an
orderly wind down of their business and operations.  To date, they
have concluded store closing sales at their retail locations and
clearance sales on their ecommerce site, and have sold their
intellectual property and brand assets.  Further, the Debtors and
their advisors have devoted significant time and resources over the
last two years to, among other things, liquidating the Debtors'
remaining assets, monetizing claims and causes of actions held
against third parties, and winding down the Debtors' estates in a
streamlined and efficient manner, while minimizing the incurrence
of administrative expense claims.   

Recently, the Debtors, in consultation with their advisors and
Crystal Financial, LLC, agent for their senior lenders, determined
that it was in the estates' best interest to request the dismissal
of these Chapter 11 Cases, which the Debtors intend to do in the
near term.

With potential dismissal looming, the Debtors have conferred with
Crystal -- which is currently owed over $500,000 -- and determined
that it is in the estates' best interest to monetize certain
remnant assets, to the extent any exist, so as to ensure that all
value is derived from the Debtors' estates prior to dissolution of
each Debtor entity.  While the Debtors are not aware of any
specific remaining estate assets, there may exist property of the
Debtors' estates, the Remnant Assets.

Accordingly, after further diligence and discussions between the
Debtors, Oak Point and Crystal, the parties memorialized their
agreement on the terms set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement.
The Purchase Agreement generally provides that Oak Point will pay
$20,000 in consideration of the Remnant Assets, whether or not such
assets exist.  Oak Point has further agreed to pay Crystal an equal
share of any amounts recovered, upon disposition of the Remnant
Assets, over and above $47,500, on the terms set forth in the
Purchase Agreement.

The Debtors ask to sell the Remnant Assets by private sale rather
than a public sale.  The Remnant Assets are de minimis in value and
not the type of assets that are easily marketed because they are
unknown in nature.  Furthermore, at this juncture in these cases,
the costs associated with further marketing and selling the Remnant
Assets at public auction far outweigh the potential benefit to be
derived therefrom.

In their business judgment, and upon consultation with Crystal, the
Debtors believe that the Purchase Price represents a fair and
reasonable purchase price for the Remnant Assets, and represents
the highest, best and, indeed, only offer therefor.  Accordingly,
they ask authority to sell the Remnant Assets pursuant to the
Purchase Agreement.

Given the anticipated dismissal of the Chapter 11 Cases in the near
term, the Debtors ask that the Court waives the 14-day stay under
the Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) with respect to the sale of the Remnant
Assets.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Wet_Seal_977_Sales.pdf

A hearing on the Motion is set for March 21, 2019 at 3:00 p.m.
(ET).  The objection deadline is March 13, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

The Purchaser:

          OAK POINT PARTNERS, LLC
          Two International Place
          17th Floor
          Boston, MA 02110
          Attn: Rebecca Tarby
          Managing Director
          Telephone: (617) 428-8709

                       About The Wet Seal

The Wet Seal, LLC, and its affiliates are a national multi-channel
specialty retailer selling fashion apparel and accessory items
designed for female customers aged 18 to 24 years old. They are
currently comprised of two primary units: the retail store business
and an e-commerce business.  Through their retail store business,
they operate approximately 142 retail locations in 37 states,
principally in lease-based mall locations. They also have
historically sold gift cards, which business has been primarily
operated through The Wet Seal Gift Card, LLC.

The Wet Seal, LLC, also known as The Wet Seal (2015), LLC, sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 17-10229) on Feb. 2,
2017.  The petitions were signed by Judd P. Tirnauer, executive
vice president and chief financial officer.

The cases are assigned to Judge Christopher S. Sontchi.

The Debtors estimated assets in the range of $10 million to $50
million and $50 million to $100 million in debt.

The Debtors tapped Robert S. Brady, Esq., Michael R. Nestor, Esq.,
Jaime Luton Chapman, Esq., Andrew L. Magaziner, Esq., of the Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, as counsel. They also tapped
Berkeley Research Group, LLC, as financial advisors; Hilco IP
Services, LLC d/b/a Hilco Streambank as intellectual property
disposition consultant; and Donlin, Recano & Company as claims and
noticing agent.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors tapped Cooley LLP and
Saul Ewing LLP as its attorneys.


WHIDBEY ISLAND HOSPITAL: Moody's Cuts 2009/2012 Bonds Rating to Ba1
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed the Baa2 rating on Whidbey
Island Public Hospital District, Washington's Unlimited Tax General
Obligation Bonds, series 2013, outstanding in the amount of $47.5
million. Concurrently, Moody's has downgraded the district's
Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, series 2009 and 2012, to Ba1
from Baa3, affecting approximately $13.3 million in debt. The
outlook was revised to negative from stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Baa2 rating on the General Obligation Unlimited Tax (GOULT)
bonds reflects continued weak financial performance of the
hospital, failure to achieve financial goals of raising liquidity,
as well as continued pressure from competitive hospital enterprise
risks. The rating and negative outlook additionally reflect narrow
liquidity, high capital needs, and the district's expectation that
it will issue $44 million in revenue bonds, including $22.5 million
in new funding and $21.5 million refunding existing debt.
Positively, the rating is supported by a large tax base and healthy
socioeconomic metrics, with Naval Air Station Whidbey Island
providing institutional presence. Additionally, debt liabilities
are modest for a local government and the GOULT bonds benefit from
a separate and unlimited tax levy that is collected and remitted
directly to the trustee for repayment of the bonds.

The downgrade to Ba1 from Baa3 on the General Obligation Limited
Tax (GOLT) bonds reflects the continued weak financial performance
of the hospital, and the lack of levy growth due to limited new
construction in the tax base. The rating on the GOLT bonds reflects
the general credit characteristics of the hospital district, as
well as the full faith and credit pledge of the district. The
two-notch rating distinction between the GOULT and GOLT bond
reflects that the operating tax levy will not be sufficient to
cover GOLT debt service in future years unless new construction far
exceeds previous trends. While not dedicated to the bonds, the
small operating property tax levy is used to pay debt service on
the GOLT bonds, and it provides just above 1-times coverage of
annual debt service, which escalates at a rate faster than expected
levy growth. The hospital's other revenues available for debt
service are constrained by the notable enterprise risk and Moody's
expectation of variable operating performance, including weak or
negative cash flow. The district's GOLT bonds are planned to be
refunded completely by the issuance of new USDA revenue bonds,
though the bonds have not been approved.

RATING OUTLOOK

The negative outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the district
will continue to underperform expectations given high capital
needs, limited new population growth, and continued competitive
pressures despite some geographic advantages.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE

  - Sustained healthier financial performance, demonstrated by
strengthened liquidity and stronger operating margin

  - Strong growth in operating property tax levy that supports
stronger GOLT debt service coverage from property taxes alone

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE

  - Continued weak operating margins in fiscal 2019, including
failure to achieve budgeted goals of improved financial
performance

  - Weak growth in the operating property tax levy that further
reduces coverage for GOLT bonds from operating property taxes

LEGAL SECURITY

The general obligation bonds are secured by an unlimited ad valorem
tax pledge. The limited tax general obligation bonds are secured by
the district's full faith and credit, and are paid from all
available general operating revenues, including the operating
property tax levy.

USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

PROFILE

Whidbey Island Public Hospital District, doing business as Whidbey
Health, operates a critical access hospital, seven satellite
clinics, an ambulance service and a few related other healthcare
services on Whidbey Island in Puget Sound, 65 miles north of
Seattle, WA (Aaa stable). The district serves a population of
approximately 67,000 residents in 2018 estimates, or 81% of the
population of Island County, WA (Aa2 no outlook).


WILKINSON FLOOR: Amends Plan to Include Strategic's Objections
--------------------------------------------------------------
Wilkinson Floor Covering, Inc., filed a further amended Chapter 11
plan and accompanying disclosure statement to disclose the
objection filed by Strategic Funding Source, Inc., dba Kapitus,
Inc., to the Disclosure Statement and the examiner's full report.

Strategic points out the following major problems:

   * The Disclosure Statement falsely states that Strategic was not
granted replacement liens and that Bank 34 was granted replacement
liens on the Debtor's personal property. The opposite is true.

   * The Disclosure Statement does not recognize that Strategic has
a lien on all of the Debtor's personal property, not just accounts
receivable.

   * The plan provides for a sale and leaseback of the Debtor's
real property without exposing the property to the market. The
recent appraisals show that the value of the property is nearly
$4.1 million to $4.25 million, but the sale price for the
transaction contemplated by the Debtor is only $3,854,000.

   * The Disclosure Statement and plan provide Strategic a secured
claim of only $410,000. Strategic's claim for $1,225,577.70 is
fully secured and must be paid in full.

   * Bank 34's claim does not appear to reflect proper application
of adequate protection payments.

   * It appears that the Disclosure Statement arbitrarily assigns
90% of the value of the real property to the Debtor, even though it
is held by the Debtor and its principal, Stephen Wilkinson, as
tenants in common. Strategic has a judgment lien on the interest
owned by Mr. Wilkinson (but not the interest owned by the Debtor),
so the purported assignment is prejudicial to Strategic.

   * The Disclosure Statement describes multiple claims against
insiders in the amount of approximately $ 2 million and the
Debtor's intent to pursue them, but the plan would give the
proceeds of those claims to unsecured creditors. Strategic's lien
on receivables covers the insider claims and Strategic should
receive any recovery of those receivables, not unsecured creditors.
And the Debtor appears to resolve the majority of the claims for a
nominal promissory note.

   * The new value contribution from the Debtor's principal is only
$50,000.

Strategic does not recommend confirmation of the Debtor's plan and
it intends to file its own plan of reorganization if the current
plan is not amended so that it is consistent with the stipulations
between Strategic and the Debtor and the Bankruptcy Code.

The Debtor asserts that Strategic is acting, by its assertions in
this Disclosure Statement and by its actions in this case, solely
for its own interest, forcing the Debtor to concede several
security interests and the assignment of the proceeds under the
pressure and risk of a trial on the motion to dismiss or convert
the case all of which caused harm to the other Creditors of this
Estate. Strategic's threat to file a competing plan that will cause
delay, additional administrative expense to this Estate, and will
reduce the payments to not only Unsecured Creditors but all
Creditors of this Estate and will be in its interest, not the
interest of creditors or the Estate, the Debtor further asserts.

A redlined version of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated March
20, 2019, is available at http://tinyurl.com/yxb73j8yfrom
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for Strategic Funding Source, Inc.:

     Justin J. Henderson, Esq.
     Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
     201 East Washington Street, Suite 1200
     Phoenix, AZ 85004-2595
     Tel: 602.262.5738
     Fax: 602.734.3937
     Email: jhenderson@lrrc.com

              About Wilkinson Floor Covering

Wilkinson Floor Covering, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 17-01228) on Feb.
9, 2017.  In the petition signed by Stephen E. Wilkinson,
president, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  The case is assigned to
Judge Eddward P. Ballinger Jr.  The Debtor hired Blake D. Gunn, as
counsel, and was substituted by Littler P.C.  The Debtor tapped
Thomas Napolitano as CFO.  Peter Davis of Simon Consulting has been
appointed as the examiner.


WILLOWOOD USA: Proposes Sale of Substantially All Assets
--------------------------------------------------------
Willowood USA Holdings, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Colorado to authorize (i) the sale of the assets
covered by the Asset Purchase Agreement with AMVAC Chemical Corp.
for $3 million plus the transferred inventory value, subject to
overbid; and (ii) the sale of certain or substantially all of the
Debtors' remaining assets, including, but not limited to, EPA
Registrations and associated inventory and executory contracts to
the Successful Bidder.

The Debtors develop, formulate, register, and sell generic crop
protection products primarily used in the United States agriculture
industry.  Among their assets are registrations with the
Environmental Protection Agency that permit the Debtors to sell
their products.

Several recent events created a liquidity shortage that forced the
Debtors to file for bankruptcy.  Initially, the Debtors received
two negative legal decisions in 2018 that permanently enjoined the
Debtors from selling their most profitable product lines in the
near-term and added millions of dollars more of liabilities than
they projected for "data compensation" liabilities.  As a result,
the Debtors were severely restricted in their ability to draw down
additional funds or obtain separate financing to help finance a
lower margin, higher volume business model to offset the loss of
their key products, meet their projected data compensation costs,
and pay overdue amounts to a key supplier, Willowood Limited.
Without sufficient cash or access to additional lending above their
borrowing base formulas, the Debtors were unable to pay for
previously received inventory sourced by Willowood Limited.

Based on these constraints, the Debtors could not fund a typical
buying pattern to grow or maintain current earnings without
additional capital infusions.  As a result, they concluded that a
sale of their Assets would be the only means to preserve and
maximize the value of their Assets for the benefit of their
stakeholders.

Initially, the Debtors utilized their industry contacts to initiate
negotiations with a potential strategic buyer.  Subsequently, they
also engaged the investment bank Piper Jaffray & Co. ("PJC") to
market the business.  Following lengthy negotiations, the Debtors
agreed with the Stalking Horse Bidder on the terms of a sale of a
substantial portion of the Debtors' EPA Registrations and
associated inventory and executory contracts, i.e., the Covered
Assets.

Pursuant to the APA, to the extent that the Debtors accept an offer
that precludes them from selling the Covered Assets to the Stalking
Horse Bidder, the Stalking Horse Bidder is entitled to a breakup
fee equal to $500,000 plus expense reimbursements in an amount not
to exceed $125,000.  The APA does not prohibit the Debtors from
marketing their Assets pending approval of the Motion.
Accordingly, PJC has been actively marketing the business since the
date of its engagement.

The Debtors own substantial assets and product lines in addition to
the Covered Assets.  Concurrent with the Motion, they filed a
separate motion requesting that the Court enters an order approving
a process for the Debtors to market and sell all Assets.  The bid
from the Stalking Horse Bidder creates a floor for the Covered
Assets.  The proposed Bidding Procedures will allow the Debtors to
market and sell all of their Assets, including the Covered Assets,
to maximize value for creditors and the estates.  The Debtors
believe that offering all product lines for sale at the same
auction pursuant to the Bidding Procedures, will maximize value by
offering potential purchaser a full range of options.  

After extensive negotiations regarding the terms and conditions
thereof, the Debtors and the Stalking Horse Bidder have executed an
APA.  The Debtors propose to sell the Covered Assets to the
Stalking Horse Bidder or to a competing bidder that submits a
higher and better offer in accordance with the Bidding Procedures
and sell their remaining Assets to a Successful Bidder(s) also in
accordance with the Bidding Procedures.  Except for Encumbrances
expressly assumed by a Successful Bidder, the Assets will be sold
free and clear of all Encumbrances whatsoever, with all
then-existing Encumbrances to attach to the net sale proceeds of
the Assets with the same validity, enforceability, and priority, if
any, as existed with respect to the Assets as of the Petition Date.


he salient terms of the APA are:

     a. The Stalking Horse Bidder is AMVAC Chemical Corp.

     b. The Purchase Price is $3 million plus (ii) the Transferred
Inventory Value.

     c. The Assets include EPA Registrations, inventory, and
certain contracts related to Abamectin, Chlorimuron, Clomazone,
Cloransulam, Glufosinate, Imazethapyr, Lactofen, Metribuzin,
Oxyflurofen, Paraquat, Pronamide, Propanil, Sulfentrazone, and
Thiobencarb.

     d. Assumed Liabilities: (i) post-Petition trade payables and
liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business, relating
solely to the Covered Assets in an amount not to exceed $250,000;
(ii) the Debtors' liabilities and obligations under the Assigned
Contracts (as defined in the APA) that accrue from and after as of
the closing date, including any cure amounts; (iii) any Liabilities
and obligations of the Seller Parties to Sulfur Mills for Clomazone
(iv) any Liabilities and obligations of the Seller Parties to India
Pesticides Limited for Thiobencarb; and (v) the Debtors' data
compensation liability associated with the transferred EPA
Registrations.  

     e. Subject to the assumption and assignment procedures
proposed herein, the Debtors will assume and assign to the Stalking
Horse Bidder the contracts listed on Schedule 1.2(b)(i) to the APA,
subject to the Stalking Horse Bidder's rights under the APA to
exclude any Assumed Contract until the Closing Date.

     f. The closing will take place not later than 10 business days
following the date that the Sale Order is entered, or on such other
date or at such other location as Willowood USA, LLC and the
Stalking Horse Bidder will mutually agree, but in any event not
later than 60 days following the date of the APA.

     g. Deposit: $1.3 million

     h. Break-up Fee: $500,000

     i. Expense Reimbursement: Reasonable out-of-pocket incurred by
Buyer in an amount not to exceed $125,000.

To facilitate the sale of the Assets, the Debtors asks
authorization to sell the all of their Assets, including the
Covered Assets, free and clear of any and all liens, encumbrances,
and other interests.  The only parties known to assert a lien in
the Assets are Key Bank, National Association and Tree Line Direct
Lending, LP.  Both assert first and second priority liens, in
accordance with the Intercreditor Agreement, dated April 20, 2016,
in substantially all assets of the Debtors.  Key Bank and Tree Line
consent to the Sale free and clear of their liens.   

In addition, just in the last few days, the Debtors have received
notifications from suppliers Willowood Ltd. and Willowood FZE that
they assert purchase money security interests in inventory owned by
Willowood USA, LLC.   The Debtors believe the claims to be wholly
without merit.  Among other reasons, neither Willowood Ltc. nor
Willowood FZE filed a financing statement against Willowood USA,
LLC.  At a minimum, sale free and clear of these alleged liens is
authorized under section 363(f)(4).

The Debtors also ask authorization to assume and assign the
Assigned Contracts to the Stalking Horse Bidder or Successful
Bidder, as the case may be.  They further ask that the Sale Order
provides that the Assigned Contracts will be transferred to, and
remain in full force and effect for the benefit of, the Successful
Bidder, notwithstanding any provisions in the Assigned Contracts.

A copy of the APA attached to the Motion is available for free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/Willowood_USA_32_Sales.pdf

Absent the transactions contemplated by the sale process and access
to DIP Loan, the Debtors would have run out of money and might have
been forced to liquidate.  The sale process provides adequate
opportunity to market the business without lingering unnecessarily
in bankruptcy proceedings -- a circumstance the Debtors cannot
afford given the limits of the budget under the DIP Loan.

Finally, the Debtors ask a waiver of any stay of the effectiveness
of the orders approving the relief requested in the Motion.  The
Sale must be effectuated expeditiously to ensure that the Debtors
do not face a loss of customers and/or a liquidity crisis, which
could irreparably harm the estates.  Thus, cause exists for a
waiver of the 14-day stay under Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and
6006(d).

The Purchaser:

          AMVAC CHEMICAL CORP.
          4695 MacArthur Court
          Suite 1200
          Newport Beach, CA 92660
          Attn: Timothy J. Donnelly
          E-mail: timd@amvac-chemical.com

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Jeffrey Garfinkle, Esq.
          BUCHALTER
          18400 Von Karman Ave, Suite 800
          Irvine, CA 92612
          E-mail: jgarfinkle@buchalter.com

                  About Willowood USA Holdings

Willowood USA, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 19-11320) on Feb. 27,
2019.  The case is jointly administered with the Chapter 11 case of
Willowood USA Holdings, LLC (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 19-11079).

At the time of the filing, Willowood USA estimated assets of $10
million to $50 million and liabilities of $10,000,001 to $50
million.  The case is assigned to Judge Kimberley H. Tyson.
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.
Morris James LLP, is special counsel.


[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings
-------------------------------------------------------
In re Andrew Marc Pitsicalis
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10062
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 11, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Guadalupe Zugey Chavez Castro
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10287
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 11, 2019
         represented by: Ruben Fuentes, Esq.
                         THE FUENTES LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: rubencpa@aol.com

In re Robert James Roon, II
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10066
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 11, 2019
         represented by: Grace R. Rodriguez, Esq.
                         E-mail: ecf2@lorgr.com

In re Roger Timothy Ruiz
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10297
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 11, 2019
         represented by: Marcus G. Tiggs, Esq.
                         BAYER WISHMAN & LEOTTA
                         E-mail: mtiggs@lawbwl.com

In re Steve Shickles, Jr. and Ronda Shickles
   Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 19-80155
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 17, 2019
         represented by: Angela Stewart Ary, Esq.
                         Kevin D. Heard, Esq.
                         HEARD, ARY & DAURO, LLC
                         E-mail: aary@heardlaw.com
                                 kheard@heardlaw.com

In re Rosalinda Del Socorro Mendoza and Jose Padilla Saldivar
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10185
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 24, 2019
         represented by: Lionel E. Giron, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF LIONEL E GIRON
                         E-mail: ecf@lglawoffices.com

In re Allen Clark Permenter
   Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 19-10167
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 25, 2019
         represented by: Thomas Harold Strawn, Jr., Esq.
                         STRAWN LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: tstrawn42@bellsouth.net

In re Squared L, LLC
   Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 19-01223
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 1, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb19-01223.pdf
         represented by: Andrew A. Harnisch, Esq.
                         MAY POTENZA BARAN & GILLESPIE, PC
                         E-mail: aharnisch@maypotenza.com

In re Bath & Kitchen Dristributors Corp.
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-12212
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 1, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb19-12212.pdf
         represented by: Melinda D. Middlebrooks, Esq.
                         MIDDLEBROOKS SHAPIRO, P.C.
                      E-mail:middlebrooks@middlebrooksshapiro.com

In re Roslyn Sefardic Center Corp.
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-70829
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 1, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Paris Management,LLC
   Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 19-20957
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 1, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/tnwb19-20957.pdf
         represented by: John Edward Dunlap, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF JOHN E. DUNLAP
                         E-mail: jdunlap00@gmail.com

In re Willie Beasley
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 19-30173
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 18, 2019
         represented by: Michael D. Lee, Esq.
                         LEE & LI, ATTORNEYS AT LAW
                         E-mail: michael.lee@lee-li.com

In re Erum Kolsy
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10459
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 27, 2019
         represented by: Lionel E. Giron, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF LIONEL E GIRON
                         E-mail: ecf@lglawoffices.com

In re Jose Luis Camarena and Patricia Rivera Camarena
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10458
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 27, 2019
         represented by: Lionel E. Giron, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF LIONEL E GIRON
                         E-mail: ecf@lglawoffices.com

In re Erum Kolsy
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10459
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 27, 2019
         represented by: Lionel E. Giron, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF LIONEL E GIRON
                         E-mail: ecf@lglawoffices.com

In re David L. Hipp and Alisa K. Hipp
   Bankr. W.D. Ark. Case No. 19-70548
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 28, 2019
         represented by: Donald A. Brady, Esq.
                         BRADY & CONNER, PLLC
                         E-mail: aadrbk@gmail.com


In re Carmine P. Amelio
   Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 19-50262
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 28, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re 3159 LLC
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-01276
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 28, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re David L. Hipp and Alisa K. Hipp
   Bankr. W.D. Ark. Case No. 19-70548
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 28, 2019
         represented by: Donald A. Brady, Esq.
                         BRADY & CONNER, PLLC
                         E-mail: aadrbk@gmail.com

In re Kiyomi Ishii
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 19-30227
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 28, 2019
         represented by: Arasto Farsad, Esq.
                         FARSAD LAW OFFICES
                         E-mail: FarsadECF@gmail.com

In re Donna Marie Standard
   Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10698
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 28, 2019
         represented by: Donna M. Standard, Esq.

In re Carmine P. Amelio
   Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 19-50262
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 28, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re 3159 LLC
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-01276
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 28, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Asanda Air II LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-10404
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 28, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-10404.pdf
         represented by: Edward F. Danowitz, Esq.
                         DANOWITZ LEGAL, P.C.
                         E-mail: edanowitz@danowitzlegal.com

In re Oakland123 LLC
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-10656
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 28, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Alice Bernice Arceneaux
   Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 19-01212
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 28, 2019
         represented by: Lefkovitz and Lefkovitz, PLLC
                         E-mail: slefkovitz@lefkovitz.com

In re Frank Earnest Siebold
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 19-40495
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         represented by: Mufthiha Sabaratnam, Esq.
                         SABARATNAM AND ASSOCIATES
                         E-mail: mufti@taxandbklaw.com

In re Two Deluna, LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No. 19-30205
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flnb19-30205.pdf
         represented by: J. Steven Ford  , Esq.
                         WILSON, HARRELL, FARRINGTON
                         E-mail: jsf@whsf-law.com

In re Patrice M. Torrence, DPM, LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-12804
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-12804.pdf
         represented by: Chad T. Van Horn, Esq.
                         VAN HORN LAW GROUP, P.A.
                         E-mail: Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

In re Avrumi, LLC
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-10665
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Rice 108 Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-30726
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-30726.pdf
         represented by: Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq.
                         JOYCE W. LINDAUER ATTORNEY, PLLC
                         E-mail: joyce@joycelindauer.com

In re Sierra Enterprises Inc.
   Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 19-40607
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/wawb19-40607.pdf
         represented by: Larry B. Feinstein, Esq.
                         LARRY B FEINSTEIN, PS
                         E-mail: feinstein1947@gmail.com

In re Transformation Temple, Inc.
   Bankr. E.D. Wis. Case No. 19-21599
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/wieb19-21599.pdf
         represented by: Richard A. Check, Esq.
                     BANKRUPTCY LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD A. CHECK
                         E-mail: court@richardacheck.com

In re Marc L. Jordan
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-00725
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Marc Cleveland Sewell and Megan Mayo Sewell
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-01766
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         represented by: Amy Denton Harris, Esq.
                         STICHTER RIEDEL BLAIN & POSTLER, P.A.
                         E-mail: aharris.ecf@srbp.com

In re Randall A. Bergeron
   Bankr. M.D. La. Case No. 19-10237
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         represented by: Arthur A. Vingiello, Esq.
                         THE STEFFES FIRM, LLC
                         E-mail: avingiello@steffeslaw.com

In re Katy J. Sleczkowski
   Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-10672
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         represented by: David B. Madoff, Esq.
                         MADOFF & KHOURY LLP
                         E-mail: madoff@mandkllp.com

In re Jacques Saade
   Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-10687
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Joy Chidumuga Stan
   Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 19-40551
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Michael George Bruce
   Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 19-10649
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         represented by: Robert M. Marino, Esq.
                         REDMON PEYTON & BRASWELL, LLP
                         E-mail: rmmarino@rpb-law.com

In re Marc Cleveland Sewell and Megan Mayo Sewell
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-01766
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         represented by: Amy Denton Harris, Esq.
                         STICHTER RIEDEL BLAIN & POSTLER, P.A.
                         E-mail: aharris.ecf@srbp.com

In re Marc L. Jordan
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-00725
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Randall A. Bergeron
   Bankr. M.D. La. Case No. 19-10237
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         represented by: Arthur A. Vingiello, Esq.
                         THE STEFFES FIRM, LLC
                         E-mail: avingiello@steffeslaw.com

In re Katy J. Sleczkowski
   Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-10672
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         represented by: David B. Madoff, Esq.
                         MADOFF & KHOURY LLP
                         E-mail: madoff@mandkllp.com

In re Jacques Saade
   Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-10687
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Wilmer Tacoronte Ortiz
   Bankr. D. P.R. Case No. 19-01178
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 2, 2019
         represented by: Damaris Quinones Vargas, Esq.
                         BUFETE QUINONES VARGAS & ASOC
                         E-mail: damarisqv@bufetequinones.com

In re Joy Chidumuga Stan
   Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 19-40551
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Michael George Bruce
   Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 19-10649
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         represented by: Robert M. Marino, Esq.
                         REDMON PEYTON & BRASWELL, LLP
                         E-mail: rmmarino@rpb-law.com

In re Two Deluna, LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No. 19-30205
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flnb19-30205.pdf
         represented by: J. Steven Ford, Esq.
                     WILSON, HARRELL, FARRINGTON, FORD, ET AL.
                         E-mail: jsf@whsf-law.com
                                 amanda@whsf-law.com

In re Patrice M. Torrence, DPM, LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-12804
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-12804.pdf
         represented by: Chad T. Van Horn, Esq.
                         VAN HORN LAW GROUP, P.A.
                         E-mail: Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

In re Avrumi, LLC
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-10665
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Rice 108 Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-30726
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-30726.pdf
         represented by: Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq.
                         JOYCE W. LINDAUER ATTORNEY, PLLC
                         E-mail: joyce@joycelindauer.com

In re Sierra Enterprises Inc.
   Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 19-40607
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/wawb19-40607.pdf
         represented by: Larry B. Feinstein, Esq.
                         E-mail: feinstein1947@gmail.com

In re Transformation Temple, Inc.
   Bankr. E.D. Wisc. Case No. 19-21599
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 1, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/wieb19-21599.pdf
         represented by: Richard A. Check, Esq.
                     BANKRUPTCY LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD A. CHECK
                         E-mail: court@richardacheck.com

In re Wilmer Tacoronte Ortiz
   Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 19-01178
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 2, 2019
         represented by: Damaris Quinones Vargas, Esq.
                         BUFETE QUINONES VARGAS & ASOC
                         E-mail: damarisqv@bufetequinones.com

In re Miguel Angel Gomez
   Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No. 19-01232
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         represented by: Andrew Moher, Esq.
                         MOHER LAW GROUP
                         E-mail: amoher@moherlaw.com

In re Roger J. Smith
   Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-53473
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         represented by: George M. Geeslin, Esq.
                         E-mail: George@GMGeeslinLaw.com

In re Northwoods.Construction, LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Ind. Case No. 19-30261
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/innb19-30261.pdf
         represented by: Jay Lauer, Esq.
                         E-mail: jay@jaylauerlaw.com

In re Roc-It Drywall, Inc.
   Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 19-43051
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb19-43051.pdf
         represented by: David R. Shook, Esq.
                         DAVID R. SHOOK, ATTORNEY AT LAW, PLLC
                         E-mail: ecf@davidshooklaw.com

In re The Worship Center
   Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case No. 19-41233
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/moeb19-41233.pdf
         represented by: Brian James LaFlamme, Esq.
                         SUMMERS COMPTON WELLS LLC
                         E-mail: blaflamme@summerscomptonwells.com

In re Hussain Corporation
   Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 19-00957
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nceb19-00957.pdf
         represented by: Samantha Y. Moore, Esq.
                         JANVIER LAW FIRM, PLLC
                         E-mail: samantha@janvierlaw.com

In re WRB, Inc.
   Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 19-40607
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txeb19-40607.pdf
         represented by: Michael D. Mosher, Esq.
                         E-mail: mdm@mosherjusticectr.com

In re Pradhan and Company, Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-40923
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-40923.pdf
         represented by: Areya Holder, Esq.
                         HOLDER LAW
                         E-mail: areya@holderlawpc.com

In re Judy Jan Davis Simmons Revocable Trust
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-40951
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-40951.pdf
         represented by: Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
                         ERIC A. LIEPINS, P.C.
                         E-mail: eric@ealpc.com

In re The Ford Children Heritage Trust
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-40952
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-40952.pdf
         represented by: Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
                         ERIC A. LIEPINS, P.C.
                         E-mail: eric@ealpc.com

In re Michael Joe Wood
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-40961
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         represented by: Kevin S. Wiley, Jr., Esq.
                         THE WILEY LAW GROUP, PLLC
                         E-mail: kevinwiley@lkswjr.com

In re Esmond Elcock
   Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-31182
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re 540P Properties LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-31233
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb19-31233.pdf
         represented by: Perry N. Bass, Esq.
                         ATTORNEY AT LAW
                         E-mail: pnbatty@earthlink.net

In re John Michael Conley and Kelly M Conley
   Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-31261
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         represented by: Deirdre Carey Brown, Esq.
                         HOOVER SLOVACEK LLP
                         E-mail: brown@hooverslovacek.com

In re Robert Marcus Michelena
   Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-70068
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         represented by: Richard O. Habermann, Esq.
                         ATTORNEY AT LAW
                         E-mail: rhabermann@hotmail.com

In re Whitty IT Solutions LLC
   Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 19-10673
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/vaeb19-10673.pdf
         represented by: Lauren Friend McKelvey, Esq.
                         ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, PC
                         E-mail: lauren.mckelvey@ofplaw.com

In re Ryder Contracting, Inc.
   Bankr. S.D. Va. Case No. 19-20087
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/wvsb19-20087.pdf
         represented by: John F. Leaberry, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF JOHN LEABERRY
                         E-mail: leaberry01@yahoo.com

In re Richard Kehoe Wayman
   Bankr. D. Wyo. Case No. 19-20090
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 4, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Edward Michael Brown and Heidi Maria Brown
   Bankr. D. Alaska Case No. 19-00067
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 5, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re New London Phoenix
   Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 19-20352
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 5, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Everald F. Thompson
   Bankr. D.C. Case No. 19-00132
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 5, 2019
         represented by: Richard B. Rosenblatt, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD B. ROSENBLATT
                         LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD B. ROSENBLATT, PC
                         E-mail: rrosenblatt@rosenblattlaw.com

In re Dillingham Restaurant Corporation
   Bankr. D. Hawaii Case No. 19-00272
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 5, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/hib19-00272.pdf
         represented by: Joseph S.Y. Hu, Esq.
                         HLAW LLC
                         E-mail: jhadvisor@gmail.com

In re Vedette Bell
   Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-10704
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 5, 2019
         represented by: John F. Sommerstein, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF JOHN F. SOMMERSTEIN
                         E-mail: jfsommer@aol.com

In re Rosemarie Antoinette Frazier
   Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 19-12835
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 5, 2019
         represented by: Richard L. Gilman, Esq.
                         GILMAN & EDWARDS, LLC
                         E-mail: rgilman@gilmanedwards.com

In re Tres Amigos Corp. d/b/a La Pulperia 84 NYC
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-10696
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 5, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb19-10696.pdf
         represented by: Raymond J. Aab, Esq.
                         E-mail: rja120@msn.com

In re Tres Mosqueteros Corp. d/b/a La Pulperia de Tito
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-10698
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 5, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb19-10698.pdf
         represented by: Raymond J. Aab, Esq.
                         E-mail: rja120@msn.com

In re Wynnefield Muilti Media LLC
   Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 19-11363
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 5, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb19-11363.pdf
         represented by: Michael P. Kutzer, Esq.
                         E-mail: mpkutzer1@gmail.com

In re Eirini Investments, LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-40974
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 5, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-40974.pdf
         represented by: Joseph F. Postnikoff, Esq.
                         GOODRICH POSTNIKOFF & ASSOCIATES, LLP
                         E-mail: jpostnikoff@gpalaw.com

In re David Edward Layson and Victoria Ann Layson
   Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 19-10728
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 5, 2019
         represented by: Brett H. Ramsaur, Esq.
                         RAMSAUR LAW OFFICE
                         E-mail: brett@ramsaurlaw.com

In re Suntec Aluminum LL
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-01888
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 6, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb19-01888.pdf
         represented by: Leon A. Williamson, Jr., Esq.
                         LEON A. WILLIAMSON, JR., P.A.
                         E-mail: leon@lwilliamsonlaw.com

In re The Turin Aviation Group, LLC
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-01890
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 6, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb19-01890.pdf
         represented by: Alberto F. Gomez, Jr., Esq.
                         JOHNSON POPE BOKOR RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP
                         E-mail: al@jpfirm.com

In re Donnell C. Williams
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-12984
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 6, 2019
         represented by: Nadine V. White-Boyd, Esq.
                         E-mail: nvwboyd@aol.com

In re Byrd Restaurants-Royal Palm, Inc
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-12991
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 6, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-12991.pdf
         represented by: Brian K. McMahon, Esq.
                         E-mail: briankmcmahon@gmail.com

In re Yeaman Machine Technologies, Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 19-05932
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 6, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb19-05932.pdf
         represented by: John H. Redfield, Esq.
                         CRANE, SIMON, CLAR & DAN
                         E-mail: jredfield@craneheyman.com

In re Max Enterprises LLC
   Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 19-12901
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 6, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb19-12901.pdf
         represented by: William A. Grafton, Esq.
                         GRAFTON FIRM, LLC
                         E-mail: wgrafton@graftonfirm.com

In re Quitman County Development Organization, Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Miss. Case No. 19-10967
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 6, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/msnb19-10967.pdf
         represented by: Craig M. Geno, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF CRAIG M. GENO, PLLC
                         E-mail: cmgeno@cmgenolaw.com

In re Mitchell Lane NY LLC
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41320
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 6, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb19-41320.pdf
         represented by: Seth D. Weinberg, Esq.
                         HASBANI & LIGHT, P.C.
                         E-mail: sweinberg@hasbanilight.com

In re The Meatpackers, Inc.
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-10702
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 6, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Greg Mitchell Layman and Donna Kay Layman
   Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Case No. 19-50405
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 6, 2019
         represented by: Mark S. Dessauer, Esq.
                         HUNTER, SMITH & DAVIS
                         E-mail: dessauer@hsdlaw.com

In re Michael Dennis Shanta
   Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 19-10704
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 6, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Pink Ocean Hospitality, LLC
   Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 19-21395
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 7, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Alliance Counseling Associates, LLC
   Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 19-10207
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 7, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/kywb19-10207.pdf
         represented by: Mark H. Flener, Esq.
                         E-mail: mark@flenerlaw.com

In re East Bushwick Buyers LLC
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41355
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 7, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Carol Marie Pettrone-Welch
   Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 19-02513
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 8, 2019
         represented by: Patrick F. Keery, Esq.
                         KEERY MCCUE, PLLC
                         E-mail: pfk@keerymccue.com

In re Key Golf Construction, Inc.
   Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No. 19-01285
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 8, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/casb19-01285.pdf
         represented by: Craig E. Dwyer, Esq.
                         E-mail: craigedwyer@aol.com

In re Kevin John Mott
   Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 19-11647
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 8, 2019
         represented by: Lance J. Goff, Esq.
                         E-mail: lance@goff-law.com

In re Bertram Andrews-Powley, III
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-01965
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 8, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb19-01965.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Little Spoon Enterprises LLC
   Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 19-13014
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 8, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb19-13014.pdf
         represented by: Augustus T. Curtis, Esq.
                         COHEN, BALDINGER & GREENFELD, LLC
                         E-mail: augie.curtis@cohenbaldinger.com

In re BV Restaurant, Inc.
   Bankr. D. Minn. Case No. 19-30675
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 8, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mnb19-30675.pdf
         represented by: Steven B. Nosek, Esq.
                         STEVEN NOSEK
                         E-mail: snosek@noseklawfirm.com

In re Tuhap Holdings, LLC
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-14765
         Chapter 11 Petition filed March 8, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb19-14765.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re MATTDOG, Inc.
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-14805
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 8, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb19-14805.pdf
         represented by: Eugene D. Roth, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF EUGENE D. ROTH
                         E-mail: erothesq@gmail.com

In re Top Rehab, Inc.
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41392
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 8, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb19-41392.pdf
         represented by: Alla Kachan, Esq.
                         E-mail: alla@kachanlaw.com

In re David DePietto
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-22590
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 8, 2019
         represented by: H. Bruce Bronson, Jr., Esq.
                         BRONSON LAW OFFICES, P.C.
                         E-mail: ecf@bronsonlaw.net

In re Paul F. Smith, Jr. D.D.S., Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No. 19-11251
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 8, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/ohnb19-11251.pdf
         represented by: Gary Cook, Esq.
                         E-mail: asjones_1@yahoo.com

In re Royalty Real Estate Holdings, LLC
   Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 19-21984
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 8, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/tnwb19-21984.pdf
         represented by: Ted I. Jones, Esq.
                         JONES & GARRETT LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: dtedijones@aol.com

In re Atlantico Bakery Corp. D/B/A Koyzina Kafe
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-10742
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 10, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb19-10742.pdf
         represented by: Daniel R. Wotman, Esq.
                         WOTMAN LAW PLLC
                         E-mail: dwotman@wotmanlaw.com

In re Adelaide Mary Arthur
   Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-31369
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 10, 2019
         represented by: James Q. Pope, Esq.
                         THE POPE LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: ecf@thepopelawfirm.com

In re Hot Springs Taxi, Inc.
   Bankr. W.D. Ark. Case No. 19-70648
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 11, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/arwb19-70648.pdf
         represented by: Branch T. Fields, Esq.
                         LAX, VAUGHAN, FORTSON, ROWE & THREET, PA
                         E-mail: bfields@laxvaughan.com

In re Crestview 3 Holdings LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-13115
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 11, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-13115.pdf
         represented by: Richard Siegmeister, Esq.
                         E-mail: rspa111@att.net

In re Gethsemane Business Development LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-53913
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 11, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Triple J Towing & Tractor Repair, LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-53972
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 11, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-53972.pdf
         represented by: Sims W. Gordon, Jr., Esq.
                         THE GORDON LAW FIRM PC
                         E-mail: law@gordonlawpc.com

In re Samuel Romero
   Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 19-50284
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 11, 2019
         represented by: William C. Vidrine, Esq.
                         VIDRINE & VIDRINE
                         E-mail: williamv@vidrinelaw.com

In re Meredith Clark Shachoy
   Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-10756
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 11, 2019
         represented by: Alan L. Braunstein, Esq.
                         RIEMER & BRAUNSTEIN, LLP
                         E-mail: abraunstein@riemerlaw.com

In re Edward Kenneth Atzert
   Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case No. 19-41373
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 11, 2019
         represented by: Nancy Stokley Martin, Esq.
                         JENKINS & KLING, P.C.
                         E-mail: nmartin@jenkinskling.com

In re George Leo Liakos and Anne Corinne Liakos
   Bankr. D. Neb. Case No. 19-40383
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 11, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Elmira Pinkhasova
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41425
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 11, 2019
         represented by: Alla Kachan, Esq.
                         E-mail: alla@kachanlaw.com

In re Jeffrey Lew Liddle
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-10747
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 11, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re The Legacy Group, Inc. Trustee of the 140905 Fish Funding
      Trust
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 19-40575
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 12, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb19-40575.pdf
         represented by: William F. McLaughlin, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM F. MCLAUGHLIN
                         E-mail: mcl551@aol.com

In re Thomas K. Stephenson
   Bankr. D.C. Case No. 19-00149
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 12, 2019
         represented by: Charles M. Maynard, Esq.
                         E-mail: CMaynard@MaynardLawGroup.com

In re Iris Ramos
   Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-10789
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 12, 2019
         represented by: David G. Baker, Esq.
                         E-mail: david@bostonbankruptcy.org

In re J.D.B.O. Ventures, Inc.
   Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 19-01117
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 12, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nceb19-01117.pdf
         represented by: John G. Rhyne, Esq.
                         JOHN G. RHYNE, ATTORNEY AT LAW
                         E-mail: johnrhyne@johnrhynelaw.com

In re Peter Draksin
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-14998
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 12, 2019
         represented by: Dean G. Sutton, Esq.
                         E-mail: dgs123@ptd.net

In re Pedro Barona
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-15018
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 12, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Nicholas Sampogna
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-71810
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 12, 2019
         represented by: Marc Scolnick, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF MARC SCOLNICK
                         E-mail: marc@scolnicklaw.com

In re Practical Approach Pediatrics, LLC
   Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 19-50566
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 12, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb19-50566.pdf
         represented by: Martin Warren Seidler, Esq.
                         E-mail: marty@seidlerlaw.com

In re Nick Armik Nazarian
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10582
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 13, 2019
         represented by: Vahe Khojayan, Esq.
                         KG LAW, APC
                         E-mail: vahe@kglawapc.com

In re Andrea Pompelli Steyn
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-12720
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 13, 2019
         represented by: Benjamin Nachimson, Esq.
                         WOOLF & NACHIMSON, LLP
                         E-mail: ben.nachimson@wnlawyers.com

In re Hans Werner Bachmann AKA Gideon Bachmann and Peter Jost
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-02092
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 13, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb19-02092.pdf
         represented by: Amanda E. Finley, Esq.
                         SEQUOR LAW, PA
                         E-mail: afinley@sequorlaw.com

In re Clavis Investments, Inc.
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-13221
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 13, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-13221.pdf
         represented by: Adelaida A. Albareda, Esq.
                         ALBAREDA & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
                         E-mail: aalbareda@albaredalaw.com

In re George Munoz
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-13251
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 13, 2019
         represented by: Susan D. Lasky, Esq.
                         E-mail: ECF@suelasky.com

In re John Balram
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41475
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 13, 2019
         represented by: Dominic S. Rizzo, Esq.
                         E-mail: dom@dsrizzo.com

In re Fuel College, LLC
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41479
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 13, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb19-41479.pdf
         represented by: Lawrence Morrison, Esq.
                         MORRISON TENENBAUM, PLLC
                         E-mail: lmorrison@m-t-law.com

In re Farshad Fasihi Harandi
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10449
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 14, 2019
         represented by: Amid Bahadori, Esq.
                         BAHADORI LAW GROUP, PC
                         E-mail: atb@bahadorilaw.com

In re Donna J. Barnes
   Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 19-20400
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 14, 2019
         represented by: Jon P. Newton, Esq.
                         REID AND RIEGE PC
                         E-mail: jnewton@reidandriege.com
  
In re Infinity Fitness and Beyond LLC
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-02172
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 14, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb19-02172.pdf
         represented by: Daniel E. Etlinger, Esq.
                         JENNIS LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: detlinger@jennislaw.com
  
In re Nulean, Inc.
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-02176
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 14, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb19-02176.pdf
         represented by: Richard John Cole, III, Esq.
                         COLE & COLE LAW, P.A.
                         E-mail: rcole3@gmail.com

In re SC Entertainment, LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case No. 19-01540
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 14, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/insb19-01540.pdf
         represented by: Eric C. Redman, Esq.
                         REDMAN LUDWIG PC
                         E-mail: eredman@redmanludwig.com

In re S.T.A.P. Industries, Inc.
   Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 19-30762
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 14, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/kywb19-30762.pdf
         represented by: David M. Cantor, Esq.
                         SEILLER WATERMAN LLC
                         E-mail: cantor@derbycitylaw.com

In re Debbie Thompson Investments, LLC
   Bankr. D.N.M. Case No. 19-10555
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 14, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nmb19-10555.pdf
         represented by: James Clay Hume, Esq.
                         HUME LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: James@hume-law-firm.com

In re Saticoy Bay LLC Series 7728 Villa De La Paz
   Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 19-11473
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 14, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb19-11473.pdf
         represented by: Roger P. Croteau, Esq.
                         ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES LTD.
                         E-mail: croteaulaw@croteaulaw.com

In re Veterans Housing Fund Series 2 LLC
   Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 19-11474
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 14, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb19-11474.pdf
         represented by: Andrew J. Van Ness, Esq.
                         HUNTER PARKER LLC
                         E-mail: hunterparkerllc@gmail.com

In re Armstead Risk Management Inc.
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41489
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 14, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Gary Brenckle
   Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 19-21014
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 14, 2019
         represented by: Robert O. Lampl, Esq.
                         ROBERT O LAMPL LAW OFFICE
                         E-mail: rol@lampllaw.com

In re Carlos Horacio Ortiz Colon and Maribel Rodriquez Rios
   Bankr. D. P.R. Case No. 19-01384
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 14, 2019
         represented by: Homel Mercado Justiniano, Esq.
                         E-mail: hmjlaw2@gmail.com

In re Andrews Logging, LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Ala. Case No. 19-10868
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 15, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/alsb19-10868.pdf
         represented by: J. Willis Garrett, Esq.
                         GALLOWAY, WETTERMARK & RUTENS, LLP
                         E-mail: wgarrett@gallowayllp.com

In re Cottone Marketing Services, Inc.
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10922
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 15, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb19-10922.pdf
         represented by: Andy C. Warshaw, Esq.
                         FINANCIAL RELIEF LAW CENTER, APC
                         E-mail: awarshaw@bwlawcenter.com

In re Walter Posner
   Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 19-07338
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 15, 2019
         represented by: Ariel Weissberg, Esq.
                         WEISSBERG & ASSOCIATES, LTD
                         E-mail: ariel@weissberglaw.com

In re Vijey R. Seri and Srilaxmi Seri
   Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 19-43760
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 15, 2019
         represented by: Michelle H. Bass, Esq.
                         WOLFSON BOLTON PLLC
                         E-mail: mbass@wolfsonbolton.com

In re The Orchard Academy, LLC
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-15301
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 15, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb19-15301.pdf
         represented by: Jeffrey A. Cooper, Esq.
                         John J. Harmon, Esq.
                         Jay L. Lubetkin, Esq.
                         RABINOWITZ LUBETKIN & TULLY LLC
                         E-mail: jcooper@rltlawfirm.com
                                 jharmon@rltlawfirm.com
                                 jlubetkin@rltlawfirm.com

In re Arkadiy Litvin
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41527
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 15, 2019
         represented by: Alla Kachan, Esq.
                         E-mail: alla@kachanlaw.com

In re F M Butt Hotels Corp
   Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-20222
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 15, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Roy Eugene Griffith and Ann Rose Griffith
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-10049
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 15, 2019
         represented by: Max Ralph Tarbox, Esq.
                         TABOX LAW, P.C.
                         E-mail: jessica@tarboxlaw.com

In re Cannon & Cannon Law, PC
   Bankr. D. Utah Case No. 19-21589
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 15, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/utb19-21589.pdf
         represented by: Andres Diaz, Esq.
                         DIAZ & LARSEN
                         E-mail: courtmail@adexpresslaw.com

In re James A. Borde
   Bankr. W.D. Wisc. Case No. 19-10709
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 15, 2019
         represented by: Paul G. Swanson, Esq.
                         E-mail: pswanson@steinhilberswanson.com

In re Eric A. Molinar
   Bankr. D. Oregon Case No. 19-30921
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 15, 2019
         represented by: Theodore J. Piteo, Esq.
                         MICHAEL D. O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES
                         E-mail: ted@pdxlegal.com

In re James M. Amor
   Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 19-11598
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 15, 2019
         represented by: John A. Digiamberardino, Esq.
                         CASE & DIGIAMBERARDINO, P.C.
                         E-mail: jad@cdllawoffice.com

In re Royal Express Processing
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10933
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 16, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb19-10933.pdf
         represented by: Michael Jones, Esq.
                         M JONES & ASSOCIATES, PC
                         E-mail: mike@mjthelawyer.com

In re Aurora-Ruby Perez Galang
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 19-30292
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 18, 2019
         represented by: Arasto Farsad, Esq.
                         FARSAD LAW OFFICES
                         E-mail: FarsadECF@gmail.com

In re New Day "N" Christ Deliverance Ministries Inc.
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-13439
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 18, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Titanium Holding LLC
   Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 19-13595
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 18, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb19-13595.pdf
         represented by: Jeffrey M. Sherman, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY M SHERMAN
                         E-mail: jeffreymsherman@gmail.com

In re Joswil Wholesale, Inc.
   Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 19-43910
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 18, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb19-43910.pdf
         represented by: Anthony James Miller, Esq.
                         Yuliy Osipov, Esq.
                         OSIPOV BIGELMAN, P.C.
                         E-mail: am@osbig.com
                                 yo@osbig.com

In re Lightfoot Family Enterprises, LLC
   Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case No. 19-41576
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 18, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/moeb19-41576.pdf
         represented by: John Talbot Sant, Jr., Esq.
                         AFFINITY LAW GROUP
                         E-mail: tsant@affinitylawgrp.com

In re Fisher Alan Covin
   Bankr. S.D. Miss. Case No. 19-50508
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 18, 2019
         represented by: Robert Alan Byrd, Esq.
                         E-mail: rab@byrdwiser.com

In re Wilber's Barbecue & Restaurant, Inc.
   Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 19-01237
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 18, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nceb19-01237.pdf
         represented by: Joseph Zachary Frost, Esq.
                         Trawick H Stubbs, Jr., Esq.
                         STUBBS & PERDUE, P.A
                         E-mail: efile@stubbsperdue.com

In re Presbyterian Church of the Palisades Non Profit
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-15415
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 18, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb19-15415.pdf
         represented by: Donald Troy Bonomo, Esq.
                         PEREZ AND BONOMO
                         E-mail: dbonomo123@gmail.com

In re Richard Smith
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-71905
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 18, 2019
         represented by: Heath S. Berger, Esq.
                         BERGER, FISCHOFF, SHUMER,
                         WEXLER & GOODMAN, LLP
                         E-mail: hberger@bfslawfirm.com

In re V&A Rest Inc.
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-22632
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 18, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb19-22632.pdf
         represented by: Robert S. Lewis, Esq.
                         ROBERT S. LEWIS, ESQ.
                         E-mail: robert.lewlaw1@gmail.com

In re Arnaldo Luis Soto-Russe and Adelina Marino Agosto
   Bankr. D. P.R. Case No. 19-01462
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 18, 2019
         represented by: Rosana Moreno Rodriguez, Esq.
                         MORENO & SOLTERO LAW OFFICE, LLC
                         E-mail: rmoreno@morenosolterolaw.com

In re C. Bros. Holdings, LLC
   Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 19-11643
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 18, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb19-11643.pdf
         represented by: Michael Jason Barrie, Esq.
                         BENESCH FRIEDLANDER COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP
                         E-mail: mbarrie@beneschlaw.com

In re Jeffrey Allen Roth and Dawn Marie Roth
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-02338
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 19, 2019
         represented by: Buddy D. Ford, Esq.
                         BUDDY D. FORD, P.A.
                         E-mail: Buddy@TampaEsq.com

In re Ralph Brian Marra
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-02370
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 19, 2019
         represented by: Steven M. Berman, Esq.
                         SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP
                         E-mail: sberman@slk-law.com

In re Ricky Alan Harris
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-13548
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 19, 2019
         represented by: Robert C. Furr, Esq.
                         E-mail: ltitus@furrcohen.com

In re Noslen Enterprise Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-54335
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 19, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Dennis G. Hellyer and Candy L. Hellyer
   Bankr. C.D. Ill. Case No. 19-80323
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 19, 2019
          represented by: B. Kip Shelby, Esq.
                          E-mail: ksnotice@mtco.com

In re Robert Scott Hellyer
   Bankr. C.D. Ill. Case No. 19-80325
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 19, 2019
         represented by: B. Kip Shelby, Esq.
                         E-mail: ksnotice@mtco.com

In re Hamtramck Medical Pharmacy, LLC
   Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 19-44033
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 19, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb19-44033.pdf
         represented by: Elliot G. Crowder, Esq.
                         Ernest Hassan, Esq.
                         STEVENSON & BULLOCK, P.L.C.
                         E-mail: ecrowder@sbplclaw.com
                                 ehassan@sbplclaw.com

In re Joseph J. Mrocka
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-15504
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 19, 2019
         represented by: David L. Stevens, Esq.
                         SCURA, WIGFIELD, HEYER & STEVENS
                         E-mail: dstevens@scuramealey.com

In re P&W Designs
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-15510
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 19, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb19-15510.pdf
         represented by: Edward Hanratty, Esq.
                         TOMES & HANRATTY P.C.
                         E-mail: thanratty@tomeslawfirm.com

In re 1100 State Street, LLC
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-15567
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 19, 2019
         represented by: Linda D. Coffee, Esq.
                         E-mail: Lcoffeelaw@aol.com

In re Edwin Bacon Hall
   Bankr. D.N.M. Case No. 19-10585
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 19, 2019
         represented by: Gerald R. Velarde, Esq.
                         E-mail: velardepc@hotmail.com

In re Peeq Media LLC
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41555
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 19, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb19-41555.pdf
         represented by: Dawn Kirby, Esq.
                         DELBELLO DONNELLAN WEINGARTEN WISE ET AL
                         E-mail: dkirby@ddw-law.com

In re 129 Weirfield St. Corp.
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41556
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 19, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Commack Plaza, LLC
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-71978
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 19, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Rebirth Christian Academy Day Care, Inc.
   Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case No. 19-01763
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 20, 2019
          See http://bankrupt.com/misc/insb19-01763.pdf   
          represented by: Eric C. Redman, Esq.
                          REDMAN LUDWIG PC
                          E-mail: eredman@redmanludwig.com

In re 735 Seal Harbor LLC
   Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-10891
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 20, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mab19-10891.pdf
         represented by: David G. Baker, Esq.
                         E-mail: david@bostonbankruptcy.org

In re Beauty Express Jon, Inc.
   Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 19-30675
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 20, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb19-30675.pdf
         represented by: George E. Jacobs, Esq.
                         BANKRUPTCY LAW OFFICES
                         E-mail: george@bklawoffice.com

In re C. Lewis Enterprises, LLC
   Bankr. W.D. Mo. Case No. 19-60287
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 20, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mowb19-60287.pdf
         represented by: James M. Poe, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF JAMES M. POE, LLC
                         E-mail: jamespoe@poe-law.com

In re Jorge Luis Avila
   Bankr. W.D. Ark. Case No. 19-70754
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 20, 2019
         represented by: Donald A. Brady, Esq.
                         BRADY & CONNER, PLLC
                         E-mail: aadrbk@gmail.com

In re Carey Patrick Cannon and Teresa Gentry Cannon
   Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 19-10300
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 20, 2019
         represented by: Kenneth W. Revell, Esq.
                         ZALKIN REVELL, PLLC
                         E-mail: krevell@zalkinrevell.com

In re Susan Hentschel
   Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-40426
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 20, 2019
         represented by: Michael B. Feinman, Esq.
                         FEINMAN LAW OFFICES
                         E-mail: mbf@feinmanlaw.com

In re John Scott Stewart
   Bankr. N.D. Miss. Case No. 19-11183
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 20, 2019
         represented by: Craig M. Geno, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF CRAIG M. GENO, PLLC
                         E-mail: cmgeno@cmgenolaw.com

In re Sandra M. Petersen
   Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 19-03233
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 21, 2019
         represented by: Thomas H. Allen, Esq.
                         ALLEN BARNES & JONES,PLC
                         E-mail: tallen@allenbarneslaw.com

In re North Gwinnett SUV, Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-54469
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 21, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-54469.pdf
         represented by: Leslie M. Pineyro, Esq.
                         JONES AND WALDEN, LLC
                         E-mail: lpineyro@joneswalden.com

In re Zus Trading, Inc.
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41664
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 21, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb19-41664.pdf
         represented by: Thomas A. Farinella, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS A. FARINELLA, PC
                         E-mail: tf@lawtaf.com

In re Bay Terrace Plaza, LLC
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41616
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 21, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re IBK Partners Inc
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41628
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 21, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re CAH Acquisition Company 7, LLC
   Bankr. W.D. Okla. Case No. 19-11040
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 21, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/okwb19-11040.pdf
         represented by: Mark B. Toffoli, Esq.
                         GOODING LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: mtoffoli@goodingfirm.com

In re Get Hooked Charters, LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-80079
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 21, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb19-80079.pdf
         represented by: Kimberly Anne Bartley, Esq.
                         WALDRON & SCHNEIDER, L.L.P.
                         E-mail: kbartley@ws-law.com

In re Michael DeSimone
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-13718
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 22, 2019
         represented by: Jay A. Meyers, Esq.
                         E-mail: jay.mblaw@gmail.com

In re Renaissance Health Publishing, LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-13729
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 22, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-13729.pdf
         represented by: Aaron A Wernick, Esq.
                         FURRCOHEN P.A.
                         E-mail: awernick@furrcohen.com

In re Natural Health News Report, LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-13730
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 22, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-13730.pdf
         represented by: Aaron A Wernick, Esq.
                         FURRCOHEN P.A.
                         E-mail: awernick@furrcohen.com

In re Richard Kane
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-72086
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 22, 2019
         represented by: Fred S. Kantrow, Esq.
                         ROSEN & KANTROW, PLLC
                         E-mail: fkantrow@rkdlawfirm.com

In re ORSE, LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-31007
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 22, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-31007.pdf
         represented by: Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
                         ERIC A. LIEPINS, P.C
                         E-mail: eric@ealpc.com

In re Michael Herbert Mueller
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10675
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 22, 2019
         represented by: Lionel E. Giron, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF LIONEL E GIRON
                         E-mail: ecf@lglawoffices.com

In re Alexander Cruz Paras
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 19-50579
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 22, 2019
         represented by: Arasto Farsad, Esq.
                         FARSAD LAW OFFICES
                         E-mail: FarsadECF@gmail.com

In re Sheila Diane Boyer
   Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 19-10923
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 22, 2019
         represented by: Stephen A. Metz, Esq.
                         OFFIT KURMAN, PA
                         E-mail: smetz@offitkurman.com

In re Pettus Properties, LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 19-80926
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 25, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb19-80926.pdf
         represented by: Stuart M. Maples, Esq.
                         MAPLES LAW FIRM, PC
                         E-mail: smaples@mapleslawfirmpc.com

In re Gail Michelle Wilson
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 19-50590
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 25, 2019
         represented by: Andrew A. Moher, Esq.
                         MOHER LAW GROUP
                         E-mail: amoher@moherlaw.com

In re Quicklab Corporation
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-02635
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 25, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb19-02635.pdf
         represented by: Michael C. Markham, Esq.
                         JOHNSON POPE BOKOR RUPPEL & BURNS LLP
                         E-mail: mikem@jpfirm.com

In re M3 Services, LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-13799
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 25, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-13799.pdf
         represented by: Robert Pereda, Esq.
                         MIAMI BANKRUPTCY GROUP
                         E-mail: robert@miamibkgroup.com

In re Michael Vincent Thrasher
   Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-54628
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 25, 2019
         represented by: Milton D. Jones, Esq.
                         MILTON D. JONES, ATTORNEY
                         E-mail: miltondjones@comcast.net

In re Lavendar Meadows LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case No. 19-01899
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 25, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/insb19-01899.pdf
         represented by: Thomas B. O'Farrell, Esq.
                         MCCLURE O'FARRELL
                         E-mail: ecf@mcclureofarrell.net

In re Wise Espresso Bar, Corp.
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41715
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 25, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb19-41715.pdf
         represented by: Alla Kachan, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF ALL KACHAN, P.C.
                         E-mail: alla@kachanlaw.com

In re Alanis Realty, LLC
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-10848
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 25, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb19-10848.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Rebel Arms Corp.
   Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 19-01175
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 25, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb19-01175.pdf
         represented by: Patrick James Best, Esq.
                         ARM LAWYERS
                         E-mail: patrick@armlawyers.com

In re Aveiro Stoughton, LLC
   Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-10987
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 26, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Even Stevens Washington, LLC
   Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 19-03426
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 26, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb19-03426.pdf
         represented by: Pernell W. McGuire, Esq.
                         DAVIS MILES MCGUIRE GARDNER, PLLC
                         E-mail: pmcguire@davismiles.com

In re Mahanthirarajah Nalliah
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-13290
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 26, 2019
         represented by: Matthew D. Resnik, Esq.
                         RESNIK HAYES MORADI LLP
                         E-mail: matt@rhmfirm.com

In re DAZHR, LLC
   Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 19-44425
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 26, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb19-44425.pdf
         represented by: David R. Heyboer, Esq.
                         HEYBOER LAW PLC
                         E-mail: HFLaw@iwarp.net

In re Midtown Investment Group Inc.
   Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 19-44507
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 26, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb19-44507.pdf
         represented by: Brett A. Border, Esq.
                         BORDER LAW PLLC
                         E-mail: bborder@savedme.com

In re Kendall William Regen
   Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 19-01900
      Chapter 11 Petition filed March 26, 2019
         represented by: LEFKOVITZ AND LEFKOVITZ, PLLC
                         E-mail: slefkovitz@lefkovitz.com


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2019.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***