/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/190402.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Tuesday, April 2, 2019, Vol. 23, No. 91

                            Headlines

342 58 STREET: Discloses Application to Retain BF&K as Counsel
401 REALTY: Court OK's Plan Outline; Plan Hearing Set for April 24
47 HOPS: Pilipchuk Buying 2007 Freightliner Box Truck $17K
4J CUSTOM DESIGN: Unsecureds Recovery Raised to $16K at 4% Interest
8800 LLC: Must Vacate, Surrender Possession of CA Premises to TMC

A GREENER GLOBE: Hearing on Trustee's Plan Set for June 5
ABSOLUTE DIMENSIONS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ALL AMERICAN OIL: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
AMBOY GROUP: Selling Substantially All Assets to Saadia for $300K
ANITA ROBERTSON-ULLOA: Selling Jonesborough Property for $18K

APEX XPRESS: Pension Funds Objects to Disclosure Statement
ARCH COAL: Law Firm Bid for Summary Judgment Partly Granted
ASP EMERALD: Moody's Lowers CFR to B3, Outlook Stable
C&H 66 QUICK: Court Conditionally Approves Disclosure Statement
CAFE MB: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

CAPSTONE PEDIATRICS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
CAPSTONE PEDIATRICS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
CENTERSTONE LINEN: Linen Newco Buying All Assets for $5.15M
CHARLES EDWARD LINCOLN: Sanctioned for Filing Frivolous Lawsuits
CHESTNUT FIRM: Porter Law Firm Objects to Plan Confirmation

CHRISTIAN ROSSIL: Rangel Buying Los Angeles Property for $550K
CITGO PETROLEUM: S&P Rates $1.2BB Senior Secured Term Loan 'B+'
COMPLETION INDUSTRIAL: Nitke Buying Rolling Stock Assets for $200K
CORETECH INDUSTRIES: Modifies Info on Creditors' Recovery from Suit
CREDIT MGMT: Selling/Abandoning North Las Vegas Personal Property

CS360 TOWERS: Trustee's Selling Deed of Trust Rights for $20K
CURO GROUP: Moody's Affirms 'B3' CFR & Senior Secured Rating
DATTA MANGLAM: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
DOYLESTOWN HOSPITAL: Moody's Confirms Ba1 Rating on $93MM Debt
DUMITRU MEDICAL: May 13 Plan Confirmation Hearing

EDEN HOME: Unsecureds to Get 100% Under Chapter 11 Plan
EVOQUA WATER: S&P Assigns 'B' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
FAIRCHILD CORP: Court Upholds Ruling in Favor of New York State
FG DINER: Additional Info on Plan's Source of Payments Disclosed
GLENWOOD PROPERTY: April 3 Mannion Auction of Brooklyn Property

GO DADDY: Moody's Raises CFR to Ba2, Outlook Stable
GOSPEL WAY: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
HAMPSTEAD GLOBAL: Case Summary & 18 Unsecured Creditors
HAROLD LEE HOLDEN: BONY Has Valid Right to Lien, Court Affirms
HEARTLAND PROPERTIES: Case Summary & 7 Unsecured Creditors

HELIX ACQUISITION: Moody's Rates $50MM First Lien Term Loan 'B2'
HOUTEX BUILDERS: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
INSCOPE INTERNATIONAL: Infinisource Buying All Assets for $5.2M
JESSELYN RADACK: Renewed Bid to Move Fitzgibbon Suit Venue Junked
JIN KIM: Paddy Buying Duluth Property for $475K

JLAN PROPERTIES: April 25 Plan Confirmation Objection Deadline
JOSEPH MUSUMECI: Selling 50% Interest in Hallandale Condo Unit
KAREN WATSON: Cusion Buying 2002 ML 320 Mercedes Benz for $1K
KENNETH HOOD: Neblett Buying The Johnson Place for $365K
KODRENYC LLC: MNAR Buying Miami Property for $9.7 Million

KRATON CORP: Moody's Alters Outlook to Pos. & Affirms B1 CFR
LA PALOMA: Dispute with Creditors Not Amenable to Mediation
LAKE BRANCH: Plan Confirmation Hearing Scheduled for April 30
LAT REALTY: April 25 Plan Confirmation Objection Deadline
LLCD LLC: Case Summary & 7 Unsecured Creditors

MAJOR EVENTS: Parkers Buying Philadelphia Property for $100K
MAJOR EVENTS: Singleton Buying Lansdowne Property for $159K
MIAMI BEVERLY: April 5 Disclosure Statement, Plan Hearing
MIDICI GROUP: Committee Objects to Disclosure Statement
MIDWEST MUSIC: Masonic Temple Buying Ellisville Property for $1.6M

MIKE & HENRY: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
MUNN WORKS: APF Wants Proposed Plan Outline Junked
NS FITNESS: Case Summary & 8 Unsecured Creditors
OGDENSBURG CITY: Moody's Rates $1.2MM Series 2019 GO Bonds 'Ba1'
ONE CALL: Moody's Lowers CFR to Caa2

PATTY DEWITT: Croesus Buying Morgantown Parcels for $1.7 Million
PAUL SHEPHERD: Choi Buying Loas Angeles Properties for $6.6M
PENINSULA RESEARCH: Court Vacates Disclosure Statement Order
PERIWINKLE PARTNERS: May 21 Confirmation Hearing on Region's Plan
POINTCLEAR SOLUTIONS: To Pay Unsecureds in Full Over 5 Years

PREFERRED CARE: To Sell Ownership of Management Units in New Plan
QUALITY CONSTRUCTION: Committee Seeks Amendment of ESNA Disclosures
QUALITY CONSTRUCTION: Guarantors Object to ESNA's New Plan Outline
QUALITY CONSTRUCTION: Wants Court to Reject ESNA's Disclosures
READING EAGLE: April 2 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel

RUNWAY HOSPITALITY: Case Summary & 6 Unsecured Creditors
SCHULTE PROPERTIES: CitiMortgage Opposes Approval of Disclosures
SERTA SIMMONS: S&P Cuts ICR to 'CCC+' Due to Underperformance
SERVICEMASTER GLOBAL: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms BB- ICR
SKYFUEL INC: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

SNEED SHIPBUILDING: 5th Cir. Upholds Dismissal of NII Appeal
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS FAMILY: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
ST. ALBANS CLEANERS: May 8 Plan and Disclosure Statement Hearing
STEPHEN M. EHRICH: Long Buying Manasuan Property for $500K
STRATOS ENTERPRISES: Selling West Monroe Property for $450K

SUNRISE COMMUNICATIONS: Moody's Completes Review, Keeps Ba2 Rating
TOTAL FINANCE: Seeks Court Approval of Proposed Plan Outline
TPE INDUSTRIES: Plan Outline Hearing Set for April 30
TSC DORSEY RUN: Sale of Real Property to Fund Proposed Plan
ULTIMATE SOFTWARE: S&P Assigns 'B-' ICR on Leveraged Buyout

UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN: Unsecureds to Get 83.2% in Annual Payments
URUS GROUP: Unsecureds to Get 100% from Sale Proceeds
VANGUARD NATURAL: Case Summary & 50 Largest Unsecured Creditors
VORNADO REALTY: Fitch Affirms BB+ Preferred Stock Rating
WABASH VALLEY: Crossroads Buying Ringgold Property for $260K

WILLOWOOD AZOXYSTROBIN: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
WILSON LAND: Rossers Buying Concord Property for $60K
WINDSOR MARKETING: New Plan Incorporates Settlement with Committee
WPX ENERGY: S&P Affirms 'BB-' ICR, Unsec. Debt Rating
YWFM LLC: Amends Plan to Modify Treatment of KSI's Secured Claim

Z GALLERIE: May 1 Hearing on Bid to Approve Disclosure Statement
[^] Large Companies with Insolvent Balance Sheet

                            *********

342 58 STREET: Discloses Application to Retain BF&K as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
342 58 Street Re LLC filed an amended disclosure statement
explaining its proposed chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

In this filing, the Debtor discloses that an application was filed
with the Court to retain Backenroth Frankel & Krinsky, LLP as
counsel to the Debtor. The Debtor anticipates an order will be
entered approving the retention. As of March 20, 2019, the Debtor
estimates that it has incurred Chapter 11 legal fees of
approximately $30,000, leaving a net amount due of approximately
$5,000 above the initial $25,000 retainer in this case. The Debtor
estimates additional legal fees of approximately $10,000, plus
future litigation fees, if any.

In addition, the Debtor estimates that through the entry of a final
decree, in this case, Allowed Administrative Expenses will total
approximately $25,000 plus litigation legal fees, if any, and such
amount will be escrowed for payment when Allowed and then paid in
the amount Allowed.

A redlined copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available at
http://tinyurl.com/yy42xjmyfrom Pacermonitor.com at no charge.  

                   About 342 58 Street Re

342 58 Street Re LLC is a privately held company in Boca Raton,
Florida engaged in activities related to real estate.

342 58 Street Re LLC  filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-23651) on
October 24, 2018.  In the petition signed by David Goldwasser,
authorized signatory of GC Realty Advisors, workout manager, the
Debtor estimated $100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to
$10 million in liabilities.

Judge Robert D. Drain is assigned to the case.

Backenroth Frankel & Krinsky, LLP, led by Mark A. Frankel,
represents the Debtor.    


401 REALTY: Court OK's Plan Outline; Plan Hearing Set for April 24
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Carla E. Craig approved 401 Realty Corp. and 401
Sunrise Corp.'s disclosure statement referring to a plan of
liquidation dated Feb. 12, 2019.

A hearing to consider confirmation of the Plan will be held in the
Courtroom of the Honorable Carla E. Craig, Chief United States
Bankruptcy Judge, Eastern District of New York, at the Conrad B.
Duberstein U.S. Courthouse located at 271-C Cadman Plaza East,
Brooklyn, New York 11201, on April 24, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.

Ballots accepting or rejecting the plan must be filed no later than
5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 17, 2019.

Written objections to confirmation of the plan must be filed no
later than 5:00 p.m. on April 22, 2019.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that Payments and
distributions under the Plan will be funded by the proceeds of the
sale of the Debtors assets in the amount of $750,000 in the 401
Realty case and $50,000 in the 401 Sunrise case, which are being
held in escrow by counsel to the Debtors. Additionally, available
cash remaining from operations in the 401 Sunrise case in the
estimated amount of $20,000 will be turned over to Debtors' counsel
for distribution to creditors. Morrison Tenenbaum PLLC will be the
disbursing agents under the Plan.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://is.gd/QT8YuJ from Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

         About 401 Realty Corp. and 401 Sunrise Corp.

401 Realty Corp. owns a real property located at 401 Randall
Avenue, Lynbrook, New York, which is a vacant lot currently used as
the back parking lot for the Lynbrook Diner.  

401 Sunrise Corp. operates a diner located at 401 Sunrise Highway,
Lynbrook, New York, known as the Lynbrook Diner.  It owns the diner
building and contents but not the land.  The land is leased from
Anna and Andreas Costa.

401 Realty Corp. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-44350) on July 27,
2018.  On Aug. 13, 2018, 401 Sunrise filed for Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-44666).  The cases are
jointly administered under Case No. 18-44350.

At the time of the filing, 401 Realty estimated assets of less than
$100,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.  401 Sunrise
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than
$50,000.

Judge Carla E. Craig presides over the cases.

The Debtors tapped Morrison Tenenbaum, PLLC as their legal counsel.


47 HOPS: Pilipchuk Buying 2007 Freightliner Box Truck $17K
----------------------------------------------------------
Mel R. Codd, the Chapter 11 Trustee of 47 Hops, LLC, asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Washington to
authorize the sale of a 2007 Freightliner Box Truck, VIN
1FVACWDC77HY75627, to Igor Pilipchuk (PDI Delivery) for $17,000,
cash.

The sale will be free and clear of any and all claims, liens, or
interests, including, but not limited to, Banner Bank, Columbia
State Bank, Douglas Mackinnon, and Anastasia Mackinnon, if any.
Should the Trustee receive a greater purchase offer prior to the
Court entering an Order approving the Sale, the Trustee asks the
Court for an Order authorizing the Trustee to accept such greater
offer without further notice to creditors and parties in interest,
or Order of the Court.

The Trustee further asks the Court for an Order authorizing (i) the
Sale to the Purchaser to be "as is, where is," without any
warranties of any kind; and (ii) the Trustee to execute a Bill of
Sale, and/or other related documents that are reasonably necessary
or appropriate to complete the Sale, and to undertake such other
actions as may be necessary or appropriate to complete the Sale.  

He further asks the Court for an Order shortening the time period
to object to the Notice of Motion to Sell Certain Personal Property
Free and Clear of Any Liens, Claims, and Interests, and Shorten
Time Period to Object to 12 from the date of the mailing of the
Notice, which includes time for mailing.  The basis of the
shortened time to object is that time is of the essence to
consummate the Sale as the Purchaser wants immediate possession of
the Vehicle.  

The Trustee is unaware of any valid, perfected liens in or upon the
Vehicle, except for Banner Bank, which has released its lien in and
upon the Vehicle.  He, in his business judgment, believes the
proposed Sale is fair and reasonable and in the best interest of
the Estate.  

                       About 47 Hops, LLC

Based in Yakima, Washington, 47 Hops LLC -- https://47hops.com/ --
sells aroma and alpha hops to breweries in 38 countries around the
world.

47 Hops LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Wash. Case No. 17-02440) on Aug. 11, 2017.  In
the petition signed by Douglas MacKinnon, its president, the Debtor
disclosed $4.3 million in assets and $7.45 million in liabilities.

Judge Frank L. Kurtz oversees the case.

Catherine J Reny, Esq., and Nathan T. Riordan, Esq., at Wenokur
Riordan PLLC, serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

The official committee of unsecured creditors tapped Cairncross &
Hempelmann, P.S., as counsel.  Marcia A. Frey, the examiner
appointed in the Debtor's case, hired Hillis Clark Martin &
Peterson P.S., as counsel.

Mel R. Codd was appointed Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor.  The
trustee tapped Southwell & O'Rourke, P.S., as his legal counsel.


4J CUSTOM DESIGN: Unsecureds Recovery Raised to $16K at 4% Interest
-------------------------------------------------------------------
4J Custom Design, Inc. filed an amended disclosure statement in
support of its proposed plan of reorganization dated March 24,
2019.

The purpose of the amended plan is: (a) to make only one impaired
class that contains all general unsecured creditors; (b) to add a
clause that debtor will pay within one year counting from the
effective date, the general unsecured creditors that would receive
$200 or less in the plan and (c) to increase general unsecured
creditors class distribution to $16,000 plus 4% interest within 60
months counting from the effective date.

Previously classified in Class 3, general unsecured creditors are
now classified in Class 2. On the consummation date, the entire
Class 2 claimants and creditors will receive from the Debtor a
non-negotiable, non-interest bearing promissory note, dated as of
the Effective Date, providing for a total amount of $16,000 plus 4%
annual interest which will be payable in consecutive monthly
installments of $294.66 during a period of five years, starting on
the Effective Date; with a monthly pro-rata distribution among all
members of this Class 2. Debtor proposes that for practical
purposes, and to avoid to issue check payment of less than $2, the
corporation will pay claimholders 2, 3, 4, and Quality Water
Service proposed distribution within one year counting from the
effective date. In all these claims debtor will receive less than
$200 for their respective entire claim.

In the initial plan, the Debtor proposed that general unsecured
creditors will receive from the Debtor a non-negotiable,
non-interest bearing promissory note, dated as of the Effective
Date, providing for a total amount of $10,000 plus 4% annual
interest which shall be payable in consecutive monthly installments
of $184.17 during a period of five years, starting on the Effective
Date; with a monthly pro-rata distribution among all members of
this Class 3.

A copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated March 24, 2019 is
available at http://tinyurl.com/y4rk7q4pfrom Pacermonitor.com at
no charge.

                 About 4J Custom Design Inc.

4J Custom Design Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 18-05704) on Sept. 28, 2018, estimating
under $1 million in assets and liabilities.  Jaime Rodriguez Perez,
Esq., at Hatillo Law Office, PSC, is the Debtor's counsel.


8800 LLC: Must Vacate, Surrender Possession of CA Premises to TMC
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Robert Kwan issued an order requiring Debtor 8800,
LLC to vacate the premises located at 8800 Sunset Blvd., West
Hollywood, CA.

The Debtor is ordered to surrender possession of the Premises to
TMC Realty, LLC, and deliver to TMC all keys to the premises, or
any part thereof.

In the event that the Debtor fails to vacate the Premises,
surrender possession of the Premises to TMC, and deliver to TMC all
keys to the Premises, or any part thereof, then TMC may apply to
the Court ex parte for an Order directing the Clerk of the Court to
issue a Writ of Possession for the Premises, and may proceed to
execute that Writ of Possession by all lawful means. To the extent
necessary, the automatic stay imposed by Section 362 of the
Bankruptcy Code is lifted to allow TMC to take back possession and
control of the Premises, and to enforce the terms of this Order and
any Writ of Possession for the Premises.

With respect to Debtor's Objection to the Form of Order Requiring
Debtor to Vacate Premises in connection with Motion of Debtor to
Assume Lease, the court sustains Debtor's Objection as to the
language, "leaving said Premises in good and clean condition,
normal wear and tear excepted," because that language is not a
requirement of 11 U.S.C. section 365(d)(4) requiring the
trustee/debtor in possession to "immediately surrender" the leased
property to the lessor and otherwise does not reflect the agreement
of the parties at the hearing on Jan. 30, 2019. The sustaining of
the objection and the striking of this language from the proposed
order from Landlord TMC is without prejudice to the assertion of a
claim by Landlord TMC based on any failure of Debtor to lease the
premises in good and clean condition, normal wear and tear
excepted, pursuant to the lease or otherwise under applicable law.

The court overrules Debtor's Objection requesting that the court
not enter the proposed order from TMC on grounds that the
protections for TMC as the lessor are already provided in the
proposed relief from stay orders because granting stay relief
itself does not compel immediate surrender as required by 11 U.S.C.
section 365(d)(4).

The bankruptcy case is in re: In re 8800, LLC, Chapter 11, Debtor
and Debtor-in-Possession, Case No. 2:18-bk-17263 RK (Bankr. C.D.
Cal.).

A copy of the Court's Order dated Feb. 5, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2V5Klk1 from Leagle.com.

8800 LLC, Debtor, represented by Martin J. Brill, David B.
Golubchik -- dbg@lnbyb.com -- Levene Neale Bender Yoo & Brill LLP &
Jeffrey S. Kwong -- jsk@lnbyb.com -- Levene Neale Bender Yoo &
Brill LLP.

United States Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Hatty K. Yip,
Office of the UST/DOJ.

                        About 8800 LLC

8800 LLC is a privately held company whose principal assets are
located at 8800 Sunset Blvd. West Hollywood, CA 90069.  8800 LLC
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-17263) on
June 22, 2018.  In the petition signed by Alan Nathan, managing
member, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1 million
to $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Robert N. Kwan.  The
Debtor is represented by lawyers at Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo &
Brill L.L.P.


A GREENER GLOBE: Hearing on Trustee's Plan Set for June 5
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California
approved the Chapter 11 Trustee's disclosure statement in support
of a plan of liquidation for Debtor A Greener Globe.

The confirmation hearing will commence on June 5, 2019 at 11:00
a.m.

Ballots accepting or rejecting the plan, and any objections to the
plan must be filed by May 22, 2019.

As previously reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, the
Trustee estimates an approximately 5% to 10% return to general
unsecured creditors.  If the real property is sold to an
overbidder, the return to general unsecured creditors likely would
be higher. If the Hayfin sale fails to close, it is unclear what
return there would be to general unsecured creditors.

A redlined version of the Disclosure Statement dated March 13,
2019, is available at http://tinyurl.com/yxdbb4tdfrom
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated February 6,
2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y2bz25ud from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                 About A Greener Globe

A Greener Globe is a California corporation qualified to do
business as a non-profit public benefit corporation.  Incorporated
on Dec. 7, 1993, the Company was formed to operate recycling
centers, provide educational materials and information on
conservation and recycling, and provide employment for physically
and mentally challenged individuals.

A Greener Globe sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 16-21900) on March 28,
2016, estimating under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.
The Debtor was represented by W. Steven Shumway, Esq.

On June 14, 2015, the Court approved the Office of the U.S.
Trustee's appointment of Russell K. Burbank as the Chapter 11
trustee.  The Chapter 11 trustee tapped Felderstein Fitzgerald
Willoughby & Pascuzzi LLP as legal counsel; Diepenbrock Elkin
Gleason LLP as special counsel; Burr, Pilger Mayer Inc. as
accountant; Wallace-Kuhl & Associates as environmental consultant;
and Business Debt Solutions Inc. as loan broker.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.


ABSOLUTE DIMENSIONS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Absolute Dimensions, LLC
        3838 W May St
        Wichita, KS 67213

Business Description: Founded in 2004, Absolute Dimensions, LLC --
                      https://www.absolutedimensions.com --
                      is machine parts manufacturer and supplier
                      in Wichita, Kansas.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 29, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Kansas (Wichita)

Case No.: 19-10489

Judge: Hon. Robert E. Nugent

Debtor's Counsel: Thomas W. Gilman, Esq.
                  HINKLE LAW FIRM, L.L.C.
                  1617 N. Waterfront Parkway, Suite 400
                  Wichita, KS 67206-6639
                  Tel: (316) 267-2000
                  Fax: (316) 660-6522
                  Email: tgilman@hinklaw.com

                    - and -

                  Nicholas R. Grillot, Esq.
                  HINKLE LAW FIRM, LLC
                  1617 N. Waterfront Parkway, Suite 400
                  Wichita, KS 67206-6639
                  Tel: 316-267-2000
                  Fax: 316-660-6523
                  Email: ngrillot@hinklaw.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Stephen Brittain, managing member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ksb19-10489.pdf


ALL AMERICAN OIL: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
------------------------------------------------------
All American Oil & Gas Incorporated; Manor Oil, Inc., formerly
known as Kern River Holdings Inc.; and Hilltop Power, Inc.,
formerly known as Western Power & Steam, Inc.; filed their Joint
Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation and accompanying disclosure
statement.

Class 5 - General Unsecured Claims. Each Holder of an Allowed
General Unsecured Claim shall receive, in full satisfaction,
release and discharge of and in exchange for all of its Allowed
General Unsecured Claim, its Pro Rata share of net proceeds of the
ORRI, if any, as and when such net proceeds are received, following
payment in full of all Allowed Administrative Tax Claims, Allowed
Priority Tax Claims, Allowed Other Priority Claims, and Allowed
Other Secured Claims, until such Holder’s General Unsecured Claim
is paid in full.

Class 2 - Allowed Secured DWT Claim. The Allowed Secured Claim DWT
Claim is secured by a retainer held by DWT in excess of the fees
that are the subject of its Claim, and such Claim shall be deemed
Allowed pursuant to this Plan in the amount of $3,847.50. The
Holder of the Allowed Secured DWT Claim shall receive, in full
satisfaction, release and discharge of and in exchange for all of
the Allowed Secured DWT Claim, on or as soon as reasonably
practicable after the Effective Date, payment, in Cash, in the
amount of $3,400.00.

Class 3 - Secured Claim of Prepetition Secured Parties. The
Prepetition Secured Parties shall receive, in full satisfaction,
release and discharge of and in exchange for the Secured Claim of
Prepetition Secured Parties, the treatment provided to the
Prepetition Secured Parties pursuant to the Settlement/Sale
Transaction and the Sale Order. The Purchasers will perform all of
their obligations pursuant to the Sale Order, including, without
limitation, making payments for those Allowed Claims that the
Purchasers agreed to assume pursuant to the Purchase Agreement.

Class 4 - Other Secured Claims.  Unless the Holder of an Allowed
Other Secured Claim agrees to different treatment, each Holder of
an Allowed Other Secured Claim shall receive, in full and final
satisfaction, settlement, release and discharge of, and in exchange
for such Claim, either: (i) the amount of such Allowed Other
Secured Claim in Cash on or as soon as practicable after the latest
of (a) the Effective Date, (b) the date that is fourteen (14) days
after the date such Claim is Allowed, or (c) such other date as may
be agreed upon in writing by the Holder of such Claim; (ii) setoff
against the retainer securing such Other Secured Claim held by the
Holder of such Claim on the Debtors’ accounts; or (iii) the
return of the applicable Collateral in satisfaction of the Allowed
amount of such Other Secured Claim.

Class 6 - Intercompany Claims . All Intercompany Claims not
previously transferred to the Purchasers pursuant to the Purchase
Agreement, shall be voluntarily waived by the applicable Debtor and
extinguished, and any documents that previously evidenced such
Intercompany Claim shall be deemed cancelled  and shall be null and
void and such documents shall evidence no Intercompany Claim
against any Debtor. Holders of Intercompany Claims shall not
receive or retain any property under this Plan on account of such
Intercompany Claim.

Class 7 - CFS Claim. KCO, as the Holder of the CFS Claim, shall
receive, in full satisfaction, release and discharge of and in
exchange for its Claim, the treatment provided to such Holder
pursuant to the Settlement/Sale Transaction, the Purchase Agreement
and the Sale Order. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement and the Sale
Order, the CFS Claim shall have been voluntarily released in full
and shall be unenforceable against either Manor or AAOG, all
without further action by any Person or the Bankruptcy Court.

Class 8 - Interests. On the Effective Date, all Interests and
equity interests in the other Debtors shall be cancelled and
extinguished. All Holders of Allowed Interests in AAOG will be
deemed Trust Beneficiaries as of the Effective Date, and shall
receive their Pro Rata share of interests in the Liquidating Trust
according to the Schedule of Interests. Such Holders will be
entitled to periodic distributions from the Liquidating Trust of
net proceeds from the ORRI, if any, as and when such payments are
received by the Liquidating Trust, following payment in full of any
unpaid but Allowed Administrative Claims, Allowed Priority Tax
Claims, Allowed Other Priority Claims, Allowed Other Secured
Claims, and Allowed General Unsecured Claims.

The Plan proposed by the Debtors provides for a liquidation of the
Debtors' remaining assets and a distribution of Cash to Holders of
Claims and Interests in accordance with the priority scheme of the
Bankruptcy Code and the terms of the Plan. The ability of the
Liquidating Trustee to make the distributions described in the Plan
does not depend on future earnings of the Debtors. Accordingly, the
Debtors believes that the Plan is feasible and meets the
requirements of section 1129(a)(11) of the Bankruptcy Code.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March  21, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y56esfqj from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                About All American Oil & Gas

All American Oil & Gas Inc. -- https://www.aaoginc.com -- is an
independent oil company headquartered in San Antonio, Texas.  It
holds and provides shared administrative and accounting services to
its two wholly-owned subsidiaries Kern River Holdings Inc. and
Western Power & Steam, Inc.  

KRH is an exploration and production company that utilizes a
state-of-the-art steam flood to extract oil within a 215-acre
leasehold, with 110 acres currently under steam flood, in the Kern
River Oil Field.  WPS is a power company that operates a
20-megawatt cogeneration facility, which -- in addition to selling
power to Pacific Gas & Electric -- provides KRH with both
electricity and steam (generated from waste heat) to aid its
extraction of oil.

All American Oil & Gas sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Texas Lead Case No. 18-52693) on Nov.
12, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtors had estimated
assets of $100 million to $500 million and liabilities of the same
range.

The cases are assigned to Judge Ronald B. King.

The Debtors tapped Dykema Gossett PLLC and Hogan Lovells US, LLP as
legal counsel; Houlihan Lokey as financial advisor; and BMC Group,
Inc., as notice, claims and balloting agent.


AMBOY GROUP: Selling Substantially All Assets to Saadia for $300K
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Amboy Group, LLC, and CLU Amboy, LLC, ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of New Jersey to authorize the sale of
substantially all assets of Amboy Group to Saadia Amboy, LLC for a
cash payment of $300,000, plus (ii) the assumption of the Newtek
Small Business Finance, LLC loans, (iii) the assumption of all
Acquired Payables, and (iv) the satisfaction of the DIP Financing
Facility, subject to higher and better offers.

The Buyer proposes to purchase all Amboy Group's Assets, including
the rights, title, and interests of Amboy Group in and to all of
the property and assets of Amboy Group used in, or otherwise
relating to the operation of the business, Whether real or
personal, tangible or intangible, of every kind and description,
and wherever located, "as is" and "where is," free and clear of all
Encumbrances for a cash payment of $300,000, plus (ii) the
assumption of the Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC loans, (iii)
the assumption of all Acquired Payables, and (iv) the satisfaction
of the DIP Financing Facility, subject to higher and better offers.


Saadia Amboy will assume and become responsible for, from and after
the Closing, only the Assumed Liabilities.

Auction Advisors advertised the sale of the Debtors and set up
meetings with several potential purchasers of the Facility.  It
intended to conduct an auction of the Facility, however, the
auction was suspended upon the purchase of the note for the
Facility by KRC Funding, LLC.  Auction Advisors procured Saadia
Amboy as a purchaser.

On Jan. 23, 2019, the Court entered an Interim Order Authorizing
Debtors to Obtain Senior Secured Post-Petition Financing.  On Feb
28, 2019, the Court entered a Bench Decision for a Final Order
Authorizing Debtors to Obtain Senior secured Post-Petition
Financing up to $1.5 million.

The purchase of the Amboy Group Assets will be subject to higher
and better offers.  Saadia Amboy, as the Buyer, will be entitled to
reimbursement of its fees, costs, and expenses relating to the
contemplated transaction and all due diligence in an amount not to
exceed $175,000; if a higher or better offer is received and
consummated by the Debtors any competing offer will be on
substantially the same terms as the offer of Saadia Amboy.  An
interested party will be deemed a Qualified Bidder upon placing a
10% deposit.

Should a higher or better offer other than the one by Saadia Amboy,
Saadia Amboy will be entitled to 5% of the Purchase Price.  The
Breakup Fee will be paid from the first sale proceeds of the
alternate transaction.  The closing of the Sale will commence not
later than 10 calendar day from entry of an approving the Sale.

The Sale of the Amboy Group's assets will be free and clear of all
Encumbrances, with all such Encumbrances to attach only to the
proceeds of the transaction.

Amboy Group's bankruptcy petition listed its personal property
valued at $1,484,116.  The purchase of Amboy Group's Assets for
approximately $1.8 million is more than fair.

The sale of the Debtors' assets will be subject to higher and
better offers.  The Qualified Bidders must tender a deposit of 10%
of its bidding price.  As a result, the Debtors are confident that
their assets' value will be maximized.  Stout and Auction Advisors
both met and negotiated with several interested parties in the
purchase of the Amboy Group Assets and CLU Amboy Assets.

Colbert will be receiving an employment agreement from Saadia Amboy
and Usak and Lambert will be receiving consulting agreements.
Colbert will be receiving a yearly salary of $45,000 plus 1% of
gross sales.  Usak and Lambert will be receiving 0.5% of gross
sales.

They have the right to purchase up to 60% of the company through
the use of personal money, or conversion of profit sharing
distributions.  This opportunity is available for five years from
closing, and conversions can only happen once a year.  The profit
sharing percentages decrease at an inverse rate of share purchases.
In order to purchase shares the individual will have to execute
and be bound by an operating agreement.

The Debtor asks to waive the stay requirements under Rule 6004(h)
in connection with the sale of the Ambooy Group Assets.

A copy of the Agreements attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Amboy_Group_510_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser:

        SAADIA AMBOY, LLC
        One West 34th Street
        New York, NY
        Attn: Jack Saadia

The Purchaser is represented by:

        Brett 8. Silverman, Esq.
        SILVERMAN LAW PLLC
        315 West 36th Street, 2nd Floor
        New York, NY 10018

                      About Amboy Group

Amboy Group LLC, d/b/a Tommy Moloney's, d/b/a Agnelli's Gourmet,
d/b/a Amboy Cold Storage, is a provider of food products and
temperature controlled warehouses.  Its food processing and cold
storage facility serves as a manufacturer/distributor of authentic
Irish and Italian meat products in America.  Amboy Group's facility
is USDA, FDA and SQF 2000 certified.

CLU Amboy, LLC, is the fee simple owner of a real property located
at 1 Amboy Avenue Woodbridge, NJ 07095 with an appraised value of
$13 million.  CLU Amboy reported gross revenue of $624,444 in 2016
and gross revenue of $644,066 in 2015.

Amboy Group holds a 51% interest in an American entity known as
Parmacotta-Amboy NA, LLC, that distributes Italian meats.  The
remaining 49% is owned by an American entity known as Parmacotto
America.  Parmacotto America is owned by Paramcotto sPa.
Parmacotto sPa has been subject to insolvency proceedings in Italy
for approximately two and half years, during which time, no revenue
has flowed from Parmacotto sPa to Amboy Group.  Amboy Group's gross
revenue amounted to $10.01 million in 2016 and $6.26 million in
2015.

Amboy Group LLC and its affiliate CLU Amboy filed Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. D.N.J. Case Nos. 17-31653 and 17-31647) on Oct.
25, 2017.  At the time of filing, the Amboy Group reported $1.48
million in assets and $7.11 million in liabilities, while CLU Amboy
reported $13.34 million in assets and $10.78 million in
liabilities.

The Hon. Christine M. Gravelle oversees the case.

The Debtors tapped Anthony Sodono, III, Esq., and Sari Blair
Placona, Esq., of Trenk, DiPasquale, Della Fera & Sodono, P.C., as
bankruptcy counsel, substituted by McManimon Scotland & Baumann,
LLP.  The Debtors hired Reitler Kailas & Rosenblatt LLC as special
counsel, and Thomas A. Ferro, P.C., as their accountant.  The
Debtors also tapped Sout Risius Ross Advisors, LLC, and its
affiliate Stout Risius Ross, LLC, as financial advisor and
investment banker.

On May 24, 2018, the Court appointed Auction Advisors as the
Debtors' auctioneer.


ANITA ROBERTSON-ULLOA: Selling Jonesborough Property for $18K
-------------------------------------------------------------
Anita L. Robertson-Ulloa, doing business as Appalachian StoneWorks,
asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Tennessee of the unimproved real property located at 397 Kinchloe
Mill Road, Jonesborough, Tennessee to Jeff and Kim Hutchins for
$18,000.

The property is located in the 13th Civil District of Washington
County, Tennessee and is the same property conveyed to Alfredo
Ulloa and wife Anita Robertson-Ulloa by deed dated Sept. 24, 2004
of record in the Register's Office for Washington County, Tennessee
in Roll 411 Image 1199.  Alfredo Ulloa has since passed away.
Anita Robertson-Ulloa is his sole heir.

The Debtor has accepted an offer to sell the property to the Buyers
for $18,000.  The parties have executed their Lot/Land Purchase and
Sale Agreement.

The property is subject to a deed of trust in favor of Southern
Finance.  The current payoff is $7,670.  The claim is accruing a
daily interest of $10.50.

The other liens attached to the property are listed in order of the
date of filing a lien in the Register of Deeds Office for
Washington County, TN and are alleged to be the only other liens
attached to the property:

     a. Tax lien of the U.S. Department of Treasury filed
12/19/2016 of record in the Register of Deeds Office for Washington
County, TN in Roll 917 Image 2413 for $36,116.

     b. Tax lien of the U.S. Department of Treasury filed 8/20/2018
of record in the Register of Deeds Office for Washington County, TN
in Roll 965 Image 209 for $3,897.

     c.  Tax lien of the U.S. Department of Treasury filed
11/2/2018 of record in the Register of Deeds Office for Washington
County, TN in Roll 970 Image 3213 for $1,816.

     d.  The judgment lien of Cavalry SPV I, LLC of 1/24/2014 of
record in the Register of Deeds Office for Washington County, TN in
Roll 826 Image 661 for $9,288 as of March 26, 2014 is not be paid
out of the proceeds of the sale of any estate property.  This claim
was determined not to be a claim secured by a valid or enforceable
judgment lien when the Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization was
confirmed.

The Debtor proposes to use the sale proceeds to pay the existing
mortgage and closing costs.  Her attorney will be paid $2,000 as
part of the proceeds for his legal services related to the Motion.
Dean Greer has already received approval from the Court to receive
attorney's fees as administrative expenses of the estate and the
payment will be applied to the existing balance of $46,754.

The net proceeds will be paid to the United States of
America/Internal Revenue Service.  Any lien not satisfied will
attach to the remaining real estate owned by the Debtor in
Washington County, Tennessee.  There will be no surplus to pay any
other entity.

A copy of the contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Anita_Robertson-Ulloa_377_Sales.pdf
     
A hearing on the Motion is set for April 16, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.

Counsel for Debtor:

       Dean Greer, Esq.
       DEAN GREER & ASSOCIATES
       P.O. Box 3708
       2809 E. Center St.
       Kingsport, TN 37664
       Telephone: (423) 246-1988
       Facsimile: (423) 378-4594
       E-mail: deangreeratty@aol.com

Anita L. Robertson-Ulloa sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.
Tenn. Case No: 14-50495)



APEX XPRESS: Pension Funds Objects to Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------------
The Local 807 Health and Pension Fund objects to the inadequacy of
the Third Amended Disclosure Statement Describing a Third Amended
Plan of Reorganization Proposed by the Apex Xpress.

The Creditor points out that no details are provided whatsoever as
to terms of the proposed exit facility. There is no disclosure as
to the who the identity of the lender is, or what the terms are,
the Creditor notes.  The Creditor further points out that the
Debtor’s representatives advised that there was no commitment
issued, and indeed represented that if the funding was not
obtained, then the Plan could not go forward.

According to the Creditor in this case, the "insider nature" of the
Plan warrants application of the absolute priority rule. The
Creditor asserts that the Absolute Priority Rule prohibits "current
holders of equity from retaining any interests or property on
account of their equity interests unless senior classes are paid in
full."

The Creditor complains there has been no showing of danger of
imminent, irreparable harm to the Debtor's ability to reorganize.
According to the Creditor that the public interest would not be
served by issuing the injunction as the reorganization proposed
herein is not likely to be successful.

The Creditor points out that the Plan fails to satisfy these
resulting administrative claims in full on confirmation. Class Four
claims are to be paid in full over 60 months without interest.
While contractual defaults can be cured through a plan, According
to the Creditor, the cure must be done "promptly" and with adequate
assurance of compensation.

The Creditor complains that the Debtor does not disclose the
existence of a $1 million receivable due from its affiliate and why
it is not being paid into the Plan for creditors nor accounted for
in its liquidation analysis.

The Creditor asserts that no details regarding the terms of the
funding, or even if a commitment has been issued, have been
disclosed by the Debtor. According to the Creditor requests were
made for the loan applications to be produced to the Fund, which
have not been complied with to date.

The Creditor points out that in the Disclosure Statement, the plan
proponent makes no mention of potential avoidance actions of the
Estate. The Creditor further point out that it is unclear from the
Disclosure Statement whether (i) the plan proponent has even
undertaken an investigation as to whether any potential avoidance
actions exist, (ii) any such avoidance actions actually do exist
that could be pursued by the Debtor and (iii) the potential value
the pursuit of these avoidance actions could bring to the
Debtor’s estate.

Section 1129(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code requires that a plan
"comply with the applicable provisions of [Title 11]."  The plan,
among other things, seeks to improperly subordinate administrative
cure claims. To do so without notice and a hearing would violate 11
U.S.C. Section 510(c) which provides that the court may equitably
subordinate claims "only after notice and a hearing." The
Disclosure Statement does not describe any legal or factual basis
for the subordination of one set of unsecured claims from another.

According to the Creditor that 11 U.S.C. Section 1129(a)(5)
requires that the proponent of the plan to disclose the identity
and affiliations of any individual proposed to serve, after
confirmation of the plan, as a . . . successor to the Debtor under
the plan. The Creditor complain that no such disclosures are made
in the Disclosure Statement or Plan.

The Creditor points out that the purported "new value" described by
the Debtor in the Disclosure Statement as $100,000.00 to be
injected by the current shareholders, curiously labelled "New
Investors," does not state how this "new value" was arrived at, and
how such "new value" is indeed "substantial", "new", and
"reasonably equivalent to the interest being retained" by the
shareholders.

Counsel to Local 807 Pension and Benefit Fund, Creditor:

     Leonard C. Walczyk, Esq.
     WASSERMAN, JURISTA & STOLZ, P.C.
     110 Allen Road, Suite 304
     Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920
     Phone: (973) 467-2700
     Fax: (973) 467-8126

                     About Apex Xpress

Apex Xpress, Inc., formerly known as Apex Trucking, provides
transportation services.  The Company offers copier, car, and
motorcycle transportation services, as well as warehousing, copier
installation, prepping, flatbed and building services. The Company
has locations in Secaucus, New Jersey, Brooklyn, Maryland and
Brockton, Massachusetts.

Apex Xpress filed for bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No.
18-13134) on Feb. 16, 2018. In the petition signed by Robert M.
Cerchione, president, the Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to
$10 million, and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.

The Hon. Stacey L. Meisel oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP as its legal
counsel, and Argus Management Corporation as its financial
advisor.

On May 19, 2018, an order was entered approving the appointment of
Kenneth J. DeGraw, as the examiner of Apex Xpress.  The Examiner
hired Mellinger Sanders & Sanders, LLC, as his legal counsel, and
Withum Smith & Brown, PC, as his accountant.


ARCH COAL: Law Firm Bid for Summary Judgment Partly Granted
-----------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiff Bryan Tarter filed the action captioned BRYAN M. TARTER,
Plaintiff, v. THRONE LAW OFFICE, P.C. and JACOB T. HASEMAN,
Defendant, No. CV 17-123-BLG-SPW (D. Mont.) against the Defendants,
his former lawyers, Throne Law Office and Jacob Haseman, for legal
malpractice. The Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on
three of Tarter's damage claims and his claim for attorney's fees
related to the underlying action in which Tarter alleges the legal
malpractice occurred.

District Judge Susan P. Watters granted in part and denied in part
Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Tarter's damages
claims.

Tarter and his family have a ranch in southeastern Montana. The
ranch consists of approximately two pieces of land: the first piece
the Tarters refer to as "Section 12," which consists of 640 acres;
the second they refer to as "Section 6" which consists of 660
acres. Tarter used Section 12 and Section 6 to grow hay and graze
cattle. He also holds several grazing permits on the Custer
National Forest, encompassing 7,000 acres adjacent to his property.


In 2010, Arch Coal, Inc. planned to develop a coal mine, known as
the Otter Creek mine, near Tarter's ranch. Arch Coal's real estate
arm, Ark Land Company, approached Tarter about surface access use
and a water monitoring agreement on Tarter's Section 12 property
for the mine. After some discussion with Arch Coal representative
Doug Downing, Tarter suggested that Arch Coal "skip" the access
angle and consider purchasing Section 12 instead.

By December 2010, at Arch Coal's suggestion, Tarter had retained
Jacob Haseman from the Throne Law Office to represent him during
the Section 12 sale. In March 2011, Arch Coal offered to purchase
Section 12 for two million dollars. The offer included $500,000
down and annual installments of $100,000 over fifteen years. In
addition, Arch Coal also offered Tarter: (1) a grazing lease on
Section 12 so that Tarter could continue to use the property for a
period of time; and (2) a repurchase option giving him the
exclusive right to re-purchase Section 12.

In August 2017, Tarter sued Defendants for professional negligence
during their representation of him in the Section 12 property sale.
Tarter has alleged damages resulting from Defendants' failure to
secure the Sale and Purchase Agreement, including the unpaid
purchase price ($833,333.67), Case's legal fees incurred in the
bankruptcy action ($60,691.65), and the initial attorneys' fees he
paid to Throne ($9,731.31).

Tarter also alleges lost opportunities and resulting profits,
including: (1) the lost opportunity to exercise his first right to
lease adjacent land owned by Arch Coal; (2) the lost opportunity to
either continue grazing the Section 12 property, or to repurchase
it, because the documents failed to address what happens in the
event the mine is not developed, and (3) the lost opportunity to
re-purchase the property at the agreed upon re-purchase price
because the re-purchase is by quitclaim deed, meaning that Tarter's
right to re-purchase is subject to any encumbrances on the
property. Defendants move for summary judgment on the lost
opportunities and profits set forth above, as well as the
attorneys' fees Tarter paid to Throne for the Section 12 sale
transaction.

Defendants argue that Tarter cannot prove that he would have an
opportunity different than his current opportunity to graze Section
12 for 20 years under the Grazing Lease because of Haseman's
improper drafting. Again, the court agrees. Under the Grazing
Lease, Tarter contracted to lease Section 12 for twenty years,
terminable at any time with written notice that Arch received a
mining permit for the land. The fact that Arch did not assume the
Sale and Purchase Agreement in the bankruptcy because of Haseman's
alleged negligence did not affect this right.

The undisputed facts show that since the sale to Arch in 2011, the
useable acres available to Tarter to lease have remained the same,
as has the scope of his ranching operation. Tarter knew that
nothing guaranteed when Arch would obtain a mining permit, thus
there was no guarantee that he would be allowed to lease Section 12
for the full 20 years. Furthermore, if and when Arch obtains a
mining permit, Tarter loses the use of Section 12 if and until Arch
decides to sell Section 12. In fact, Tarter admitted that he could
be precluded from leasing Section 12 for "whatever period of time,"
until Arch decided to offer him the repurchase rights, which is
"why he needed all of the money [he] sold it for." None of these
factors are impacted by the Purchase Option or Haseman's failure to
secure the Sale and Purchase Agreement. Accordingly, Tarter cannot
prove that he lost any opportunity with respect to the Grazing
Lease provision due to Haseman's drafting. Defendants' motion for
summary judgment on Tarter's lost opportunity and lost profits with
respect to leasing Section 12 is granted.

While Tarter still has the burden of demonstrating the amount of
damage he incurred because of the way Haseman drafted the Purchase
Option, it cannot be disputed Tarter suffered the loss of a valid
Purchase Option and genuine issues of fact exist regarding whether
Haseman was the legal cause of that loss. Tarter has established
that, but for Haseman's negligence in drafting the Sale and
Purchase Agreement, which resulted in significant encumbrances on
Section 12 and a genuine issue of fact whether Tarter may ever
exercise the Purchase Option, Tarter would more probably than not
possess the practical ability to purchase Section 12 through the
Purchase Option. Accordingly, summary judgment is not appropriate
on this claim or the associated lost profits.

A copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated Feb. 6, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2CKWNi9 from Leagle.com.

Bryan M. Tarter, Plaintiff, represented by James Devlan Geddes --
DEVLAN@GOETZLAWFIRM.COM -- GOETZ, BALDWIN & GEDDES, P.C. & Kyle W.
Nelson -- KNELSON@GOETZLAWFIRM.COM -- GOETZ, BALDWIN & GEDDES,
P.C.

Throne Law Office PC & Jacob T. Haseman, Defendants, represented by
Bradley J. Luck, GARLINGTON LOHN & ROBINSON, PLLP & Leah T.
Handelman, GARLINGTON LOHN & ROBINSON, PLLP.

                       About Arch Coal

Founded in 1969, Arch Coal, Inc., is a producer and marketer of
coal in the United States, with operations and coal reserves in
each of the major coal-producing regions of the Country.  As of
January 2016, it was the second-largest holder of coal reserves in
the United States, owning or controlling over five billion tons of
proven and probable reserves.  

Arch Coal, Inc., and 71 of its affiliates filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case Nos. 16-40120 to
16-40191) on Jan. 11, 2016.  The petition was signed by Robert G.
Jones as senior vice president-law, general counsel and secretary.

The Debtors disclosed total assets of $5.84 billion and total debt
of $6.45 billion at the time of the bankruptcy filing.  Judge
Charles E. Rendlen III has been assigned the case.

The Debtors engaged Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP as counsel, Bryan
Cave LLP as local counsel, FTI Consulting, Inc. as restructuring
advisor, PJT Partners as investment banker, and Prime Clerk LLC as
notice, claims and solicitation agent.

An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors was appointed in the
case.  The Committee retained Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
as counsel; Spencer Fane LLP as local counsel; Berkeley Research
Group, LLC as financial advisor; Jefferies LLC as investment
banker; and Blackacre LLC as coal consultant.

                            *     *     *

The Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri on
September 13, 2016, entered an order confirming the Debtors' Fourth
Amended Joint Plan dated as of September 11, 2016.  The Plan was
amended on September 15.  On October 5, 2016, Arch Coal consummated
the transactions contemplated by the Plan, which became effective
on that date.


ASP EMERALD: Moody's Lowers CFR to B3, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded ASP Emerald Holdings, LLC's
Corporate Family Rating ("CFR") to B3 from B2, and Emerald
Performance Materials, LLC's first lien senior secured rating on
the term loan and revolving credit facility to B2 from B1 and the
second lien senior secured term loan rating to Caa2 from Caa1.
Moody's also downgraded Emerald's probability of default rating to
B3-PD from B2-PD. The outlook is stable.

"The downgrade reflects Emerald's elevated leverage, failure to
materially reduce debt, as well as the lack of EBITDA growth and
weak free cash flow generation over the past years as the company
get closer to its debt maturities in 2021," said Domenick R. Fumai,
Moody's Vice President and lead analyst.

Downgrades:

Issuer: ASP Emerald Holdings, LLC

  Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to B3-PD from B2-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to B3 from B2

Issuer: Emerald Performance Materials, LLC

  Senior Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility, Downgraded
  to B2 (LGD3) from B1 (LGD3)

  Senior Secured First Lien Term Loan, Downgraded to B2 (LGD3)
  from B1 (LGD3)

  Senior Secured Second Lien Term Loan, Downgraded to Caa2 (LGD5)
  from Caa1 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: ASP Emerald Holdings, LLC

  Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

Issuer: Emerald Performance Materials, LLC

  Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

The downgrade is prompted by Emerald's sustained elevated leverage
and failure to materially reduce debt consistent with Moody's
expectations as a result of the company's operating performance and
view that the company will not generate sufficient cash flow for
meaningful debt reduction over the next 12 months. Moody's adjusted
Debt/EBITDA has consistently been in the 6.0-6.5x range over the
past several years. Emerald's total debt has not meaningfully
declined since 2014 while EBITDA has been fairly flat since fiscal
year 2016. Moody's does not expect material debt reduction over the
next two years due to continued weak free cash flow generation, as
a result of fairly significant capex investments in 2019 and 2020.
Moody's projects adjusted Debt/EBITDA to decline slightly from an
estimated 6.4x as of December 31, 2018 towards 6.0x in 2019.
Ratings are also constrained by Emerald's modest size with sales of
$629 million and debt maturities in 2021. Potential event risk due
to private equity ownership and unique corporate structure with
separate and independent business division managers is another
factor limiting the rating.

The B3 CFR rating is supported by Moody's expectation that
operational issues which impacted results in 2018, including the
fire at Akron, will not recur in 2019. Moody's expects volumes at
the Akron plant to improve as the plant has resumed operation in
December 2018. Also supporting the rating is the company's moderate
product portfolio diversity, geographic reach and exposure to less
cyclical end markets such as food, beverage and personal care.
Furthermore, Emerald benefits from back integration into toluene
oxidation, which allows margins in its largest segment, EKC, to be
better insulated from raw material price volatility than many of
its competitors.

Emerald's liquidity is adequate and supported by its $75 million
senior secured revolver, which was recently extended to April 2021.
Emerald had $75 million available under the revolving credit
facility as of December 31, 2018. Cash on the balance sheet was
approximately $5.4 million as of December 31, 2018. The $75 million
revolver has a first lien leverage test of 7.25x, which we expect
Emerald to be in compliance with over the next 12-18 months. The
$525 million senior secured first lien term loan due July 2021 has
a 50% excess cash flow sweep mechanism, with step-downs to 25%
under 6.0x total leverage and 0% under 5.5x total leverage. The
$230 million senior secured second lien term loan due 2022 does not
contain financial covenants.

The B2 ratings on the first lien revolver and term loan, rated one
notch above the B3 CFR, reflect their priority position relative to
the second lien term loan, which is rated two notches below the CFR
at Caa2.

The stable outlook assumes that financial performance and credit
metrics improve modestly, but free cash flow remains challenged.
Moody's would likely consider a downgrade of the ratings if
adjusted leverage does not improve in 2019, or free cash flow
remains anemic through April 2020, when the liquidity facility goes
current. Ratings could also be downgraded if there is a significant
increase in gross debt as a result of an acquisition or dividend.
Moody's would consider upgrading the ratings if the company
achieves sustained adjusted financial leverage below 5.5x
(Debt/EBITDA) and Retained Cash Flow to Debt (RCF/Debt) sustained
above 15%. We expect the sponsor will allow company to maintain
capital structure targets consistent with these metrics while
retaining product and geographic diversity.

ASP Emerald Holdings, LLC ("Emerald"), headquartered in Vancouver,
Washington is a producer of specialty chemicals used in a wide
range of food and industrial applications. The company was acquired
in late-2014 by private equity firm American Securities from prior
private equity owner Sun Capital Partners Inc. Emerald operates in
two major segments: Emerald Kalama Chemicals (EKC) and CVC
Thermoset Specialties (CTS). Emerald generated sales of about $629
million for the year-ended December 31, 2018.


C&H 66 QUICK: Court Conditionally Approves Disclosure Statement
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Bankruptcy Court has conditionally approved the Amended
Disclosure Statement explaining C and H 66 Quick Mart PFC Imports
Inc.'s First Amended Plan of Liquidation filed by Chapter 11
Trustee Robert E. Eggmann.

The Trustee proposes to liquidate substantially all assets of the
Debtor and make a lump sum distribution to the Debtor's secured and
unsecured creditors along with payment of the costs of
administration of the estate.

The Amended Plan changes treatment of Class 2 - Secured Claim of
Capital Crossing Small Business Finance, LLC, f/k/a Business Loan
Center, Inc.  The Class 2 claim is impaired.
CCSBF is a Secured Claimant Credit holding liens on substantially
all of the assets of the Debtor.  CCSBF's Secured Claim is Allowed
in the amount of $764,203.  The liens of CCSBF against the assets
of the Debtor shall continue unimpaired.  The Allowed Secured Claim
of CCSBF shall be paid in full from the proceeds of the sale of the
Collateral Pool within ninety (90) days of the Effective Date, or
such further date as agreed to by Trustee and CCSBF.

Class 4 - Allowed Interests are impaired. Class 4 consists of all
Allowed Interests in the Debtor. All Class 4 Allowed Interests will
(a) be cancelled on the Effective Date and (b) receive no
Distribution under the Plan.

The Collateral Pool will be liquidated and used to fund the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 21, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y6hbs3hvfrom PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                    About C & H Quick Mart

Based in Granite City, Illinois C & H Quick Mart/PFC Imports, Inc.,
a convenience store operator, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the US Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ill. Case No. 05-32102) on May
12, 2005.  The Debtor disclosed $1,658,080 on total assets and
$630,315 in liabilities.  Bruegge and Mollet, led by name partner
Robert T Bruegge, is the Debtor's counsel.


CAFE MB: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Cafe MB, LLC
           d/b/a The Slab House
        3230 Durazno Ave.
        El Paso, TX 79905

Business Description: Cafe MB, LLC dba The Slab House is a
                      wholesaler of stone slabs in El Paso, Texas.
                      The Slab House was founded in 2015.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 29, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Texas (El Paso)

Case No.: 19-30543

Judge: Hon. Christopher H. Mott

Debtor's Counsel: E. P. Bud Kirk, Esq.
                  E. P. BUD KIRK
                  600 Sunland Park Drive, Ste. 400
                  El Paso, TX 79912
                  Tel: (915) 584-3773
                  Email: budkirk@aol.com

Total Assets: $390,836

Total Liabilities: $1,026,799

The petition was signed by Fernanda Gabber, vice president.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 18 unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb19-30543_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb19-30543.pdf


CAPSTONE PEDIATRICS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Capstone Pediatrics, PLLC
        1420 Donelson Pike Suite B-17
        Nashville, TN 37217

Business Description: Capstone Pediatrics --
                      http://www.capstonepediatrics.com--
                      operates a pediatric and adolescent
                      center focused on delivering personalized
                      care designed to improve and maintain its
                      patients' health and well being.  Capstone
                      is owned by Dr. Gary Griffieth, who operates

                      Capstone as its chief executive officer.
                      The Company previously sought bankruptcy
                      protection on Dec. 18, 2015 (Bankr. M.D.
                      Tenn. Case No. 15-09031).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 28, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)

Case No.: 19-01971

Judge: Hon. Randal S. Mashburn

Debtor's Counsel: David W. Houston, IV, Esq.
                  BURR & FORMAN LLP
                  222 Second Avenue South, Suite 2000
                  Nashville, TN 37201
                  Tel: 615-724-3215
                       615-724-3200
                  Fax: 615-724-3315
                  Email: dhouston@burr.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Gary G. Griffieth.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/tnmb19-01971_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/tnmb19-01971.pdf


CAPSTONE PEDIATRICS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Capstone Pediatrics, PLLC
          dba Centennial Pediatrics
        1420 Donelson Pike, Suite B-17
        Nashville, TN 37217

Business Description: Capstone Pediatrics, PLLC --
                      http://capstonepediatrics.com-- is an
                      independent, privately-held pediatric
                      company in Middle Tennessee.  Capstone
                      Pediatrics is a pediatric and adolescent
                      center focused on delivering personalized
                      care designed to improve and maintain its
                      patients' health and well being.  Capstone
                      is owned by Dr. Gary Griffieth, who operates

                      Capstone as its chief executive officer.  The

                      Company previously sought bankruptcy
protection
                      on Dec. 18, 2015 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No.
15-09031).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 28, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)

Case No.: 19-01968

Judge: Hon. Marian F. Harrison

Debtor's Counsel: Emily Campbell Taube, Esq.
                  BURR & FORMAN, LLP
                  222 Second Avenue South, Suite 2000
                  Nashville, TN 37201
                  Tel: 615-724-3237
                  Fax: 615-724-3337
                  Email: etaube@burr.com

                    - and -

                  David W. Houston, IV, Esq.
                  BURR & FORMAN LLP
                  222 Second Ave. S., Suite 2000
                  Nashville, TN 37201
                  Tel: 615-724-3200
                  Email: dhouston@burr.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Gary G. Griffieth.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/tnmb19-01968.pdf


CENTERSTONE LINEN: Linen Newco Buying All Assets for $5.15M
-----------------------------------------------------------
Alliance Laundry & Textile Service, LLC, doing business as Clarus
Linen Systems, and Atlas Health Care Linen Services Co., LLC, doing
business as Clarus Linen Systems ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of New York to authorize the bidding
procedures in connection with the sale of substantially all assets
to Linen Newco, LLC for $5.15 million, subject to overbid.

Centerstone is a closely-held Delaware limited liability company
with a principal office and place of business located at 60 Grider
Street, Buffalo, New York.  It is the corporate parent of four
subsidiary corporations: Atlas, Alliance, Atlanta and Winchester.
Centerstone provides back-office and administrative support for its
subsidiaries and is the entity into whose bank account all accounts
receivable collected by the Debtors are deposited and from which
all operating cash is disbursed to the operating subsidiaries.

Atlas is a Delaware limited liability company that currently
operates two linen rental and commercial laundry facilities at the
following locations: (i) 414 Taylor Street, Syracuse, New York and
(ii) 60 Grider Street, Buffalo, New York 14215.  Atlas previously
operated two other facilities located at (i) 3 East Industrial
Parkway, Troy, New York 12180 that ceased operating on Dec. 14,
2018 and (ii) 304 Jumonville Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219
that closed in December 2017.

The Syracuse Facility consists of a 75,000 square foot plant with a
current capacity of 400,000 pounds of linen per week that services
numerous regional customers including six major customers (five
hospitals and a rehabilitation center) that accounted for
approximately $4.3 million in revenue in 2017.  The gross revenue
earned at the Syracuse Facility totaled $12,586,000 in 2017.  This
Facility has approximately 157 active employees, and approximately
149 are hourly wage earners and the remaining eight are salaried
personnel.  The workforce at the Syracuse Facility is unionized and
Atlas is a party to three Collective Bargaining Agreements covering
the Syracuse employees: (i) the Rochester Regional Joint Board,
Local 2607 (101 production employees - Agreement is currently under
extension); (ii) the Teamsters, Local Union 182 (eight
engineering/maintenance employees - Agreement expired on June 30,
2018); and (iii) the Teamsters, Local Union 294 (21 drivers -
Agreement expires on Sept. 30, 2019).  Atlas is also a member of
the respective Multi-Employer Pension Plans for those three unions.
Atlas owns all of the personal property assets located at the
Syracuse Facility; however, the Syracuse Facility is leased from
landlord ACN Companies, LLC.

The Buffalo Facility consists of a 56,445 square foot plant with a
current capacity of 450,000 pounds of linen per week that services
numerous regional customers including five major customers (three
hospitals and two regional medical centers) that accounted for
approximately $5.5 million in revenue in 2017.  The gross revenue
earned at the Buffalo Facility totaled $11,531,000 in 2017.  The
Facility has approximately 150 active employees, and approximately
141 are hourly wage earners and the remaining nine are salaried
personnel.  The workforce at the Buffalo Facility is unionized and
Atlas is a party to two Collective Bargaining Agreements covering
the Buffalo employees: (i) the International Union of Operating
Engineers, Local 17-175 AFL-CIO (six engineering/maintenance
employees - Agreement expires on April 12, 2019) and (ii) the
Rochester Regional Joint Board, Local 51 (96 production employees -
Agreement expires on Oct. 31, 2019).  Atlas is also a member of the
respective Multi-Employer Pension Plans for those two unions.

Nearly all of the operating equipment located at the Buffalo
Facility is leased by Centerstone and Atlas from lessor 60 Grider,
LLC pursuant to a lease dated July , 2013.  The Buffalo Equipment
Lease expires on Dec. 31, 2020.  Centerstone and Atlas also lease
the Buffalo Facility from 60 Grider, LLC pursuant to a lease
agreement dated Dec. 1, 2013 that expires Dec. 31, 2023.

Centerstone owns certain office furniture, fixtures and equipment
located at its administrative offices at 60 Grider Street, Buffalo,
New York 14215.  These assets are included in the Purchased Assets
as the "Office Assets."

The Debtors ask the relief in light of their financial inability to
continue operating their businesses, and their desire to sell their
businesses to a qualified purchaser as going concerns for the
benefit of their creditors.   In furtherance of this goal, on March
13, 2019, they entered into the Purchase Agreement with the
Purchaser, pursuant to which the Purchaser proposes (i) to purchase
substantially all of the Debtors' assets, with the possible
exception of such other assets designated as Excluded Assets in
Section 2.3 and on Schedule 2.3(i) of the Purchase Agreement, free
and clear of all liens, claims, interests and encumbrances, and
(ii) to assume certain liabilities, including cure obligations
listed on Schedule 2.4(c) that are owed under the Assigned
Contracts, in exchange for the payment of an aggregate purchase
price of $5,150,000, comprising (i) Cash at Closing in the amount
of $3 million, (ii) a subordinated note payable to HSBC Bank USA,
National Association in the amount of $1 million secured by a
second priority lien on the Purchaser's machinery, general
equipment and linen inventory, and (iii) $1.15 million of accounts
receivable collections, payable by (a) a promissory note payable to
HSBC Bank in the amount of $700,000 irrespective of actual accounts
receivable collected, and (b) $450,000 payable to HSBC Bank from
the collection of accounts receivable using the Purchaser's best
collection efforts.  The Purchase Agreement also contemplates the
assumption and assignment of Assigned Contracts to the Purchaser,
and is subject to higher and better offers and to the approval of
the Court.

In the event that the Court approves, and the Seller consummates, a
sale of the Purchased Assets to a competing bidder, the Seller will
pay to the Purchaser an expense reimbursement of up to $50,000 from
the sale proceeds.

In an effort to ensure that the highest value is obtained for the
Purchased Assets, the Debtors propose that the Bidding Procedures,
which are intended to maximize the value of the Purchased Assets,
should govern the submission of competing bids for the Purchased
Assets.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: 4:00 p.m. (ET) on April 11, 2019

     b. Initial Bid: A purchase offer in excess of the Purchase
Price by $100,000, the amount of the Expense Reimbursement plus
$50,000

     c. Deposit: equal to 10% of the bidder's Initial Qualified
Overbid

     d. Auction: If one or more Qualified Bids, other than the
Purchaser's, are received by the Debtors, an Auction will be held
on April 15, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. at the offices of Bond, Schoeneck
&King, PLLC, One Lincoln Center, Syracuse, New York 13202, or such
other time and/or other place as the Debtors will notify all
Qualified Bidders who have submitted Qualified Bids with respect to
the Purchased Assets.  All qualified Bidders desiring to
participate at the Auction must appear and participate in person.

     e. Bid Increments: $50,000

     f. Sale Hearing: 1:00 p.m. on April 17, 2019

The Debtors have determined that it is in the best interests of
their estates, their creditors, their employees, their customers
and other parties in interest to sell the Purchased Assets.  Their
management believes that the approval of the sale is critical to
preserving the value of the Purchased Assets for the benefit of all
creditors, and it is necessary to inform the Debtors' customers
about their contracts on a go-forward basis.

There are various amounts of pre-petition arrears that have accrued
in connection with the Assigned Contracts.  The Purchaser has
agreed to assume all cure obligations which must be paid to
counterparties to the Assigned Contracts, in addition to the
Purchase Price.  Accordingly, the Debtors anticipate that all of
the parties to the Assigned Contracts will consent to the
assignment to Purchaser in order to allow the continued operation
of the Debtors' businesses.

The Debtors propose to serve the Notice of Auction and Sale Hearing
not later than two business days after entry of the Bidding
Procedure Order.


By the Motion, the Debtors ask the entry by the Court of two
orders:

     (a) first, the Bidding Procedures Order:

          i. providing a process for interested bidders to submit
competing offers with respect to the Purchased Assets;

          ii. approving the form and manner of the Notice of
Auction and Sale Hearing and the Notice of Assumption and
Assignment;

          iii. setting a deadline and approving requirements and
procedures for interested parties to submit any competing bids for
the Purchased Assets;

          iv. approving the Purchaser as the "stalking horse"
purchaser, with certain bid protections as required by the Purchase
Agreement, and approving the form of Purchase Agreement;

          v. authorizing an auction sale of the Purchased Assets,
if necessary; and

          vi. setting a final hearing date to approve the sale of
the Purchased Assets to the bidder submitting the highest or
otherwise best offer (the "Successful Bid") acceptable to the
Debtors, HSBC Bank, and the Committee.

     (b) second, the Debtors ask the entry of the Sale Order:

          i. authorizing and approving the Successful Bid on
substantially the terms and conditions set forth in the Purchase
Agreement, or such other terms and conditions as may be acceptable
to the Debtors in consultation with HSBC Bank and the Committee;

          ii. authorizing the sale of the Purchased Assets to the
Successful Bidder;

          iii. authorizing the Debtors to consummate the sale of
the Purchased Assets to the Successful Bidder; and

          iv. authorizing the Debtors to assume certain identified
executory contracts and unexpired personal property leases and to
assign such Assigned Contracts to the Successful Bidder.

A copy of the APA and the Bidding Procedures attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Centerstone_Linen_285_Sales.pdf

                    About Clarus Linen Systems

Atlas Health Care Linen Services Co., LLC, Alliance Laundry &
Textile Service, LLC and two other entities, all doing business as
Clarus Linen Systems -- http://www.claruslinens.com/-- provide
linen rental and commercial laundry services to the healthcare
industry, primarily supplying scrubs, sheets, towels, blankets,
patient apparel and other linen products to hospitals and
healthcare clinics via long-term contacts.

Atlas and Alliance currently operate five production facilities in
three states (Atlas operates two facilities in New York and
Alliance operates two facilities in Georgia and one in South
Carolina) that provide daily pick-ups and deliveries to their
customers.

Centerstone Linen Services, LLC, is the corporate parent of four
subsidiary corporations and provides back-office and administrative
support to them.  

Centerstone Linen Services and its four subsidiaries (Bankr.
N.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-31754) in Syracuse, New York on Dec. 19,
2018.

Atlas Health estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and
liabilities of the same range as of the bankruptcy filing.
Centerstone Linen estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and
$10 million to $50 million in liabilities.

BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


CHARLES EDWARD LINCOLN: Sanctioned for Filing Frivolous Lawsuits
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned DONNA CERIGNY, ET. AL., v. JOSEPH THOMAS
CAPPADORA, ET. AL, SECTION: "B" (1), Civil Action No. 17-11111, No.
c/w 18-0869 (E.D. La.), District Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle ordered
that Plaintiff Charles Edward Lincoln III's pleadings be stricken
and all his claims be dismissed. Sanctions are imposed upon
Plaintiff in the amount of $75,000 for his continuous barrage of
frivolous lawsuits and pleadings filed in this Court.

On Oct. 24, 2017, Plaintiff Lincoln, joined by two other
plaintiffs, filed a complaint against numerous defendants,
asserting, inter alia, breach and dissolution of partnership,
breach of contract, fraud in the inducement, racketeering, and
intentional infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiffs alleged
minimum direct actual damages in the amount $150,000, with total
damages exceeding $1,500,000. On Nov. 14, 2017, the Clerk of this
Court issued a RICO Standing Order. Plaintiffs responded with a
partial RICO statement and completed RICO statement. Subsequently,
numerous motions were filed, including motions for extension,
motions to strike, emergency motions, motions for leave to file,
and motions to dismiss parties. Since the filing of this lawsuit,
at least three of the originally named defendants have been
dismissed from the case. On June 5, 2018, Civil Action No. 18-869
was consolidated with this case. Plaintiff Lincoln has several
other cases pending in this Court, including Civil Action Nos.
17-12275 c/w 18-6308, 17-17423, and 18-4542.

In his numerous filings, Plaintiff Lincoln makes inappropriate
assertions regarding the First City Court Judge in New Orleans,
referring to the judges as "butchers who operate with cleavers
disguised as gavels." Plaintiff Lincoln continues to file frivolous
filings with illogical arguments in this Court. He has been
sanctioned for similar behavior in several other districts,
including the Western District of Texas.

On August 3, 2018, this Court ordered Plaintiff Lincoln to show
cause in writing why this case and all other connected cases should
not be dismissed sua sponte in their entirety and to further show
cause why sanctions should not be imposed onto Plaintiff Lincoln.

Plaintiff's Response fails to address why this Court should not
strike his pleadings, dismiss his pending lawsuits, and impose
monetary sanctions. Specifcally, Plaintiff states that he has filed
a new Chapter 11 bankruptcy case and that all his pending lawsuits
in this Court should be transferred to the court where his new
bankruptcy case is now pending; requests this Court to allow him to
speak his opinion against Louisiana State Court Judges; states that
a named defendant is absolutely in default because she is a "bad
apple and bad actor"; demands this Court to itemize each and every
paragraph in his pleadings that violate Rule 11(b); states that he
intends to support his Complaint with affidavits from "people all
over the world" and with the help of a committed "cohort and ally"
that has been incapacitated and unable to help; and contends that
the sanctions imposed by Judge Walter Smith against him in Texas in
2008 were "entered in secret (at least secret from [him])."

After being given an opportunity to explain his claims and avoid
dismissal of his claims, Plaintiff Lincoln filed another incoherent
and conclusory pleading. Recognizing the need to curtail further
frivolous filings that overburden this Court, this Court should
invoke its general supervisory power to control its docket.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's pleadings at issue are stricken and his
claims in all matters are dismissed.

Plaintiff will be prohibited from filing pleadings and lawsuits in
this Court, or removing any Louisiana state cases to this Court
until imposed sanctions are paid in whole to this Court's registry,
or unless leave of court it first granted.

A copy of the Court's Order dated Feb. 6, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2OI1xtL from Leagle.com.

Donna Cerigny, Plaintiff, pro se.

Kristie S. Hoots-Meyer, Plaintiff, pro se.

Charles Edward Lincoln, III, Plaintiff, pro se.

Jill Jones-Soderman, Defendant, pro se.

E. Anderson-Trahan, Veronica E Henry & Angelique A. Reed, Consol
Defendants, represented by David Glen Sanders , Louisiana
Department of Justice Litigation Division.

Matthew Chenevert, Consol Defendant, pro se.

Yu-Wen Chiu, 18-869 & Chih-Yang Hu, Consol Defendants, represented
by Matthew P. Chenevert , Matthew Chenevert, Attorney at Law.

Monique G. Morial, Counter Defendant, represented by David Glen
Sanders , Louisiana Department of Justice Litigation Division.

Anita Harris, Movant, pro se.

Charles Edward Lincoln, III filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-26726)on August 21, 2018.


CHESTNUT FIRM: Porter Law Firm Objects to Plan Confirmation
-----------------------------------------------------------
Creditors Marwan Porter, Esq., and The Porter Law Firm, LLC, object
to the confirmation of the Amended Plan of Reorganization  proposed
by the Debtor, the Chestnut Firm, LLC.

The Creditors complain that the Amended Plan apparently disregards
this aspect of Debtor's business and revenue. The Creditors further
point out that it is reasonable that if Debtor continues in
business, that revenues from contingency fees will be more than
adequate to pay all creditors substantially more than the Amended
Plan provides. The Creditors complain that the Amended Plan fails
to account for this realistic possibility and that Debtor
realistically can have sufficient revenue to pay more on all
creditors’ claims.

The Creditors assert that the Debtor represented to the Court at
the hearing on the Amended Disclosure Statement that Debtor was no
longer seeking any fee from the Robinson Case. According to the
Creditors, however, at its 2004 Examination on February 13, 2019,
Debtor stated that it would seek reimbursement of the approximately
$450,000 to $500,000 in expenses that it advanced for the Robinson
Case.

The Creditors complain that the Amended Plan further fails to
address the constructive trust that the Porter Creditors have on
40% of what the Debtor could receive in fees from the Robinson
Case.

According to the Creditors, Christopher Chestnut held himself out
as the sole owner of the Debtor. The Creditors point out that per
the Amended Disclosure, Mr. Chestnut proposes to bid $25,000 to
purchase the equity interest in the Debtor that will be
extinguished under the Amended Plan. The Creditors further point
out that presuming that Mr. Chestnut is highest bidder at the
confirmation hearing for that equity interest, the Amended Plan
needs to address the disciplinary matters facing Mr. Chestnut that
can adversely affect his and the Debtor’s ability to engage in
the practice of law.

Attorney for Marwan Porter and The Porter Law Firm, LLC:

     Matthew D. Macy, Esq.
     Cohen Cooper Estep & Allen, LLC
     3330 Cumberland Blvd, SE, Suite 600
     Atlanta, GA 30339
     Telephone: (404) 814-0000 ext 203
     Facsimile: (404) 816-8900
     E-mail: mmacy@ccealaw.com

                   About Chestnut Firm

Chestnut Firm, LLC, is private law firm in Atlanta, Georgia.
Chestnut Firm, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga.
Case No. 18-56014) on April 9, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Christopher Chestnut, manager, the Debtor estimated up to $50,000
in total assets and $1 million to $10 million in total liabilities.
Cameron M. McCord, Esq., at Jones & Walden, LLC, is the Debtor's
counsel; and Bennett Thrasher, LLP, is the accountant.


CHRISTIAN ROSSIL: Rangel Buying Los Angeles Property for $550K
--------------------------------------------------------------
Christian Rossil asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California to authorize the sale of his real property
located at 326 West Gage Avenue, Los Angeles, California to Gabi
Rangel for $550,00, free and clear of all liens, claims and
interests, subject to overbid.

The Debtor is a licensed realtor and owns and operates an
investment property.  His investment property is the Property.  He
is the sole owner of the Property.  The bankruptcy case was
precipitated by the imminent foreclosure of the Property.  The sale
date was scheduled for Jan. 9, 2019.  Moreover, the Debtor is
delinquent on several liens secured against his primary residence.


The Debtor has minimal assets other than the Property and his
interest in his primary residence located at 6932 East El Roble
Street, Long Beach, California, which he owns jointly with his
mother.   He has minimal income. The Property produces gross
monthly rent of $2,500.  In addition to the right to receive rental
income, he works part-time as a Lyft driver while he continues to
work towards his long-term goals of being a full-time real estate
investor and sales agent.   

The majority of Debtor's debts are liens secured against the two
properties.  As of the Petition Date, the Debtor estimated that the
general unsecured claims against the Estate totaled approximately
$14,000.  The Franchise Tax Board and the Internal Revenue Service
have filed priority claims in the amounts of $4,205 and $49,365,
respectively.     

The Debtor marketed the Property throughout 2018 prior to receiving
the most recent offer.  The prospective Buyer of the Property is
the current tenant of the Property.

Through the Motion, the Debtor proposes to sell the Property, a
single-family residence.  He asks to fund a portion of his Plan of
Reorganization through the sale of the Property.  In addition to
the estimated proceeds from the sale, he submits that the funds
available to the estate will likely be substantially more.  

The Debtor, simultaneously with the prosecution of the Motion, will
ask through adversary complaints filed against the secured
creditors holding liens against the Property to void said liens in
whole or in part.  The allegations of said complaints will include
usury claims and challenges to the amount of said claims (i.e., the
Debtor did not receive the amounts the creditors promised to lend).
The Debtor proposes that proceeds in the amount of all secured
claims against the Property be held in escrow by the Debtor's
attorney until the resolution of said adversary proceedings or as
agreed to by the parties.  

he Property was listed by the Debtor throughout 2018.  By far the
best offer that the Debtor received was from the Buyer, the current
tenant of the Property, to purchase the Property for the sum of
$550,000.  The parties have executed the Residential Purchase
Agreement.

The principal terms of the Agreement are:

     1. Purchase price is $550,000;

     2. The Buyer will initially deposit $5,000 into escrow;

     3. The Buyer will subsequently deposit $35,000 into escrow;

     4. The escrow was to close within 60 days of the date of
acceptance of the offer, by Dec. 18, 2018.   The closing was
postponed due to the impending foreclosure sale and filing of the
case.  However, the parties are prepared to close within 48 hours
of entry of the order.

The Debtor submits that the price to be paid for the Property by
the Buyer is the best offer that will be received and has therefore
decided to accept it.  In fact, the offer is in excess of the fair
market value of the Property.

The proposed sale will produce funds to pay secured creditors,
taxes, expenses and priority claims.  A summary of the estimated
closing costs and proceeds is reflected on Exhibit B.

The Debtor proposes the following overbidding procedures:

     1. The initial overbid must be at least $50,000 more than the
initial bid of $550,000.  The overbid must be on substantially the
same terms as set forth in the complete Residential Purchase
Agreement.

     2. Overbid increments will be $25,000 after the initial
overbid.

     3. Any successful overbidder must be able to close by the
Proposed Closing Date.

     4. Any party wishing to overbid on the Property during the
hearing on the Motion must contact the Debtor's counsel at least 72
hours prior to the hearing and provide evidence of available
financial resources such as funds and/or proof of ability finance
up to the overbidder's maximum bid to the Debtor's reasonable
satisfaction.

     5. Any overbidder wishing to overbid on the Property during
the hearing must also submit, before the time of the hearing, a
deposit for the purchase of the Property, by cashier's check or
other cash equivalent in the amount of at least $100,000 made
payable to the "Becker Law Group Trust Accout."  The successful
overbidder's deposit will be applied towards the purchase of the
Property and will not be refunded in the event the overbidder
cannot successfully close escrow pursuant to the terms of the
sale.

     6. If an agent or broker brings a prospective bidder who is
ultimately the successful bidder and to who the sale is approved,
will be entitled to a commission not to exceed 2.5%.  

     7. In the event that the Buyer is not the successful purchaser
of the Property, the Buyer will be reimbursed the earnest money
deposit that remains in escrow.

Finally, the Debtor asks the Court should waive the 14-day stay of
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) to permit him to proceed with the close of
escrow on the sale as soon as possible.

A hearing on the Motion is set for April 2, 2019 at 1:00 p.m.

A copy of the Contract and the Exhibit B attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/Christian_Rossil_23_Sales.pdf

Counsel for Debtor:

          Todd Becker, Esq.
          BECKER LAW GROUP
          117 E. Colorado Blvd.
          Suite 500
          Pasadena, CA 91105
          Telephone: (626) 777-7700
          Facsimile: (626) 714-7603
          E-mail: boyer@beckerlawgroup.com

Christian Rossil sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal.
Case No. 19-10153) on Jan. 8, 2019.  The Debtor tapped Todd B.
Becker, Esq., at Becker Law Group, as counsel.


CITGO PETROLEUM: S&P Rates $1.2BB Senior Secured Term Loan 'B+'
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it assigned its 'B+' issue-level rating and
'1' recovery rating to U.S.-based refinery and petroleum product
marketer and distributor CITGO Petroleum Corp.'s $1.2 billion
senior secured term loan due in 2024. At the same time, S&P Global
Ratings placed the rating on CreditWatch with developing
implications.

The company plans to use the proceeds from the financing to provide
liquidity for ongoing business needs. In addition, the company
plans to terminate its revolving credit facility and AR
securitization facility.

S&P's issuer credit ratings on CITGO Petroleum and parent CITGO
Holding Inc., and the issue ratings on their debt, are unchanged
and remain on CreditWatch with developing implications, where they
were placed Dec. 7, 2017.

The 'B+' issue-level rating and the '1' recovery rating on the term
loan due in 2024 reflect the potential for very high (90%-100%;
rounded estimate: 95%) recovery prospects in a default. The company
plans to use the proceeds from the financing to provide liquidity
for ongoing business needs. Furthermore, the company plans to
terminate its $900 million revolving credit facility due in 2019
and $320 million AR securitization facility due in 2019. In S&P's
view, the company's liquidity position will remain adequate to fund
its needs as the term loan issuance will provide almost $1.2
billion in excess cash that will sufficiently offset the absence of
a revolving credit facility and receivables securitization
facility.

S&P's recovery analysis contemplates a simulated default in 2021
due to a combination of potential factors including low EBITDA from
unfavorable margins and plant operational problems during a
cyclical downturn in the volatile refining sector. The rating
agency values the company using an asset valuation approach. S&P
applies a valuation multiple of $2,750 per barrel per day of
throughput capacity, given the high complexity rating of the
company's refineries. Furthermore, S&P estimates an inventory
valuation of approximately $1.42 million assuming a $50 crude oil
price, AR of almost $1.1 billion, and an estimated terminal
valuation of $320 million assuming a $25 multiple per barrel of
storage capacity.

Simulated default and valuation assumptions:

-- Simulated year of default: 2021
-- Net enterprise value after 5% administrative costs and
valuation adjustment from pensions: $4.4 billion

Simplified waterfall:

-- Total collateral value available to secured debt after priority
capital lease claims: $4.2 billion
-- Senior secured claims: $2.9 billion
-- Recovery rating: '1' (90%-100%; rounded estimate: 95%)

CreditWatch with developing implications means there is a
significant likelihood of a rating action, either negative or
positive, within the next 90 days.

Events that could lead to a positive rating action include CITGO
Holding's sale to a company with a stronger credit profile than
Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA).

Events that could lead to a negative rating action include PDVSA
seeking bankruptcy protection that a court agrees must include
CITGO Holding or the government of Venezuela taking an action that
impairs the company's operational capability, such as forcing an
asset sale that alters CITGO Holding's cash flow profile. In
addition, a negative rating action could follow a change of control
at CITGO Holding and the requirement to repurchase bonds is not
waived.

  RATINGS LIST
  CITGO Petroleum Corp.
  Issuer credit rating                             B-/Watch Dev/--

  Ratings Assigned
  $1.2 billion senior secured term loan due 2024   B+/Watch Dev
  Recovery rating                                  1 (95%)


COMPLETION INDUSTRIAL: Nitke Buying Rolling Stock Assets for $200K
------------------------------------------------------------------
Completion Industrial Minerals, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Texas to authorize the sale of its
remaining rolling stock assets, consisting of vehicles and other
items of self-propelled motorized equipment, to Nitke Sales, Inc.
for $200,000.

One of CIM's last remaining unsold operating assets is its rolling
stock.  In general, the Rolling Stock consists of the
self-propelled equipment and vehicles used by CIM from 2011, when
it commenced operations, to 2016, when it suspended those
operations.

Over the last several months, CIM has actively invited offers from
established auctioneers and used equipment buyers to purchase the
equipment. CIM has determined to accept one such offer, made by
Nitke, to purchase the rolling stock for the agreed purchase price.
The offer and related sale terms have been set forth under the
terms of an Asset Purchase Agreement negotiated by the parties.

Generally, the APA provides for the following: (i) the APA is
contingent upon entry of an order by this Bankruptcy Court of an
order approving of the APA; (ii) the sale of the Rolling Stock will
be for the Purchase Price; (iii) CIM will convey the Rolling Stock
to Nitke free and clear of liens, claims and encumbrances; and (iv)
the sale will be "as is, where is" and without warranty.

Based on its efforts, it is CIM's informed belief that the Purchase
Price and the other terms of the proposed sale are fair and
reasonable.  Nitke's offer is the highest and best offer that CIM
has received.  Furthermore, CIM otherwise believes that the
proposed sale is reasonable and in the best interest of its estate
and creditors.

As previously noted, CIM has ceased operations and is no longer
operating the Rolling Stock.  Accordingly, it is in the best
interests of CIM, its estate and its creditors that CIM consummate
the proposed sale without undue delay.  Accordingly, cause exists
for the Bankruptcy Court to waive the 14-day stay under Bankruptcy
Rule 6004(h).

A copy of the APA attached to the Motion is available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Completion_Industrial_190_Sales.pdf

The objection deadline is March 27, 2019.

               About Completion Industrial Minerals

Completion Industrial Minerals, LLC -- http://www.ciminerals.com/
-- is a producer of northern alpha quartz proppants.  It is a
full-service provider of products and services from the quarry to
the rail head at destination.

Completion Industrial Minerals sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-43208) on Aug.
1, 2017.  In the petition signed by Thomas Giordani, its president,
the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  Judge Russell F. Nelms oversees the case.  Fishman
Jackson Ronquillo PLLC is the Debtor's counsel.

                          *     *     *

Completion Industrial Minerals has moved for appointment of a
Chapter 11 trustee to take over management of the estate.  CIM says
it does not have the cash resources to fund continued operations
and its current management does not have particular expertise in
bankruptcy restructuring matters.


CORETECH INDUSTRIES: Modifies Info on Creditors' Recovery from Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Coretech Industries, LLC filed an amended disclosure statement in
support of its amended chapter 11 plan dated March 21, 2019.

The amended plan provides that the Debtor has evaluated potential
claims which may be brought. The Debtor does not believe any claims
under the provision of the Bankruptcy Code exist which would be
beneficial for the Debtor to pursue or which would result in a
higher return to the creditors. The Debtor does maintain an action
against Southwest Dynamics for damages to its property. The Debtor
currently is seeking counsel to pursue that action. In the event
the Debtor pursues that action, any recovery will be paid to the
Class 7 creditors instead of the Class 6 creditors provided in the
initial plan.

A copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available at
http://tinyurl.com/y6mor8sufrom Pacermonitor.com at no charge.  

                 About CoreTech Industries

CoreTech Industries, LLC, is a machine shop located at 8300 S.
Central Expressway in Dallas, Texas.  Its principal owner is
Richard Arn.

CoreTech Industries, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Case No. 18-34196) on Dec. 18, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Richard Arn, Managing Member, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities in the range of $500,001 to $1 million.  The Debtors
tapped Eric A. Liepins, Esq., at Eric A. Liepins, P.C., as its
counsel.


CREDIT MGMT: Selling/Abandoning North Las Vegas Personal Property
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Credit Management Association, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Nevada to authorize the sale or abandonment of
personal property located at 3110 Cheyenne, North Las Vegas,
Nevada.

The Debtor is the owner of the Real Property.  It consists of an
approximately 10,500 square foot office building situated on
approximately 0.93 acres of land, and is designated as Assessor
Parcel Number 139-08-416-005.  The Debtor currently occupies
approximately 4,148 square feet of the 10,500 square foot premises,
and leases approximately 1,557 square feet of the premises to
PrideStaff.

The Real Property has housed the Debtor's Las Vegas operations.  In
connection with its reorganization effort, the Debtor has been and
is continuing to minimize its payroll obligations and other
expenses. To further the effort, the Debtor plans to permit its
approximately 5 Las Vegas based employees to work remotely,
obviating the need for the Debtor to continue to own much of its
office furniture and equipment currently located at the Property.

The Debtor has received a purchase offer for the Real Property, and
a motion to approve sale of the Real Property is currently set for
hearing on March 27, 2019, at 9:30 a.m.  Pursuant to the terms of
the proposed sale, Debtor will have until 30 days after closing to
vacate the Real Property.

The Debtor asks to dispose of personal property such as outdated
and unused computer equipment including monitors, monitor stands,
desktop CPU's, and refurbished tablets with outdated software; aged
servers with obsolete technology; old printers that are no longer
used by the Debtor; small microwave and Keurig coffee maker with
little value; older model refrigerators, stove, and dishwasher;
surplus uninterrupted power supplies with little to no value; and
office desks, chairs, and cubicles that hold no book value and
little to no market value ("Personal Property").  The expense
associated with moving and storing the Personal Property would far
exceed its value.  The items described are outdated and are no
longer useful for the Debtor's future business operations.

Through negotiations, the Buyer and CMA arrived at an agreement
whereby the Buyer will purchase any of Personal Property and
equipment for an agreed upon sum if the Buyer can use the Personal
Property for its business purposes.  Through the Motion, the Debtor
asks approval of the Court to sell such Personal Property to the
Buyer; to attempt to sell the remaining Personal Property through
social media; and, if unsuccessful, to abandon any remaining
Personal Property that is currently housed at 3110 W. Cheyenne but
holds little to no value for the Debtor and its estate.

              About Credit Management Association

Credit Management Association, Inc. --
http://creditmanagementassociation.org/-- is a non-profit
association that has served business-to-business companies since
1883.  CMA helps credit, collection, and financial decision-makers
get the information and support they need to make fast, accurate
credit decisions.  In addition, CMA assists insolvent companies
with workouts or liquidation through cost effective alternatives to
bankruptcy.  CMA has 800 members who pay a $495 annual fee for full
membership or a $265 annual fee for an associate membership.  CMA
is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Credit Management Association, based in North Las Vegas, Nevada,
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 18-16487) on
Oct. 31, 2018.  In the petition signed by Kimberly Lamberty,
president and CEO, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million
in both assets and liabilities.  The Hon. Mike K. Nakagawa oversees
the case.  The Debtor hired Clark Hill, PLLC, as reorganization
counsel.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants, LLC, is the claims and
noticing agent.


CS360 TOWERS: Trustee's Selling Deed of Trust Rights for $20K
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bradley Sharp, the Chapter 11 Trustee of CS360 Towers, LLC, asks
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California to
authorize the sale of the Debtor's rights under a promissory note
that is secured by a deed of trust to Unit 806 in the building
located at 500 N Street, Sacramento, California, to Laura
Hudson-MacDonald for $20,000, subject to higher and better bids.

The estate owns and operates real estate assets consisting of
residential condominium units, as well as commercial office space,
located in the building at 500 N Street, 14 Sacramento, California.
The Debtor is the beneficiary under a promissory note dated Nov.
15, 2012 or thereabouts in the principal amount of $30,000.  The
Trustee is not in physical possession of the Note.  The Note is
secured by a deed of trust dated as of Nov. 15, 2012, in favor of
the Debtor as beneficiary, against Unit 806, 500 N Street,
Sacramento, California.

The Trustee has entered into an agreement pursuant to which the
Trustee will sell the Debtor's rights under the Promissory Note and
Deed of Trust to the Proposed Buyer.  The agreement has been
documented as the Agreement Regarding Purchase of Rights under
Promissory Note and Assignment of Deed of Trust.  The Agreement has
been fully executed, but its terms provide that it is subject to
notice to creditors, approval by the Court, and higher and better
bids.

Thus, the instant motion is filed, asking an order of the Court
authorizing the Trustee to sell the Deed of Trust Rights in
accordance with the Agreement.  The proposed sale is not a "free
and clear" sale.  The Deed of Trust Rights will be sold as is."
The Trustee proposes to sell the Deed of Trust Rights to the
Proposed Buyer, or higher bidder, for $20,000.

The Trustee believes the purchase price is for fair value.  Because
the Sale is subject to overbid, and because all creditors will be
notified of the proposed Sale, the Court and parties in interest
can be assured that the ultimate sales prices will be fair and
reasonable.  The underlying obligation does not accrue interest, so
the discount of face value, in exchange for prompt payment as
opposed to the time, delay, and cost of foreclosing on the Deed of
Trust, is appropriate.  And, again, the price is subject to
overbid.

The Trustee respectfully asks entry of an order approving the Sale,
and any further relief necessary thereto, including a determination
of the inapplicability of Fed. R. 20 Bank. P. 6004(h), so that the
proposed Sale can close as soon as possible.

A hearing on the Motion is set for April 10, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.

                        About CS360 Towers

CS360 Towers, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Cal.
Case No. 17-20731) on Feb. 3, 2017.  Mark D. Chisick, manager,
signed the petition.  The Debtor tapped Stephan M. Brown, Esq., at
the Bankruptcy Group, P.C., as counsel.  At the time of filing, the
Debtor disclosed total assets of $18.46 million and total
liabilities of $5.72 million.

The case is assigned to Judge Robert S. Bardwil.  

Bradley Sharp was appointed as Chapter 11 Trustee for the estate of
CS360 Towers, LLC pursuant to order of the court dated March 15,
2017.  The assets of the estate include condominium units (both
residential and commercial) in the building located at 500 N.
Street, Sacramento, California, and various claims and causes of
action.

Attorneys for Chapter 11 Trustee Bradley Sharp:

         Jamie P. Dreher, Esq.
         Downey Brand LLP
         621 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor
         Sacramento, CA 95814-4731
         Telephone: (916) 444-1000
         Facsimile: (91b) 444-2100
         E-mail: jdreher@downeybrand.com


CURO GROUP: Moody's Affirms 'B3' CFR & Senior Secured Rating
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed Curo Group Holdings Corp.'s
corporate family rating and senior secured rating at B3. The
outlook remains stable.

Moody's has also withdrawn the outlooks on Curo's corporate family
rating and senior secured debt rating for its own business reasons.


Affirmations:

Issuer: Curo Group Holdings Corp.

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3

Gtd Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed B3.

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rating affirmation with a stable outlook reflects Moody's view
that Curo's financial performance in the next 12-18 months will
remain solid despite reduced earnings in Canada due to the loan
portfolio transitioning to lower-margin products from highly
profitable single-point loans (equivalent to payday loans) and
substantial charges and costs related to the exit from the UK
market. Also incorporated in Curo's ratings is the absence of term
debt maturities until 2025. At the same time, the ratings reflect
high asset risk, further heightened by the company's fast loan
portfolio expansion, and high regulatory risk.

In February 2019, Curo announced that it had made a decision to
exit the UK market, which accounted for 4% of its total revenues in
2018. The decision was precipitated by an elevated number of claims
related to the company's underwriting process in the UK. In
connection with the exit from the UK market, Curo recognized $32.3
million of charges in the fourth quarter of 2018, including $9.8
million of costs related to the customer claims and a $22.5 million
goodwill impairment charge. The company expects to recognize an
additional non-cash loss in Q1 2019 in respect of its exit from the
UK.

In late 2018, Curo revised down its previous earnings guidance for
the year due to a meaningful loss of earnings in Canada. The
decline in earnings resulted from the company's transitioning away
from the most profitable single pay product to lower-priced line of
credits, due to regulatory restrictions. Canada accounted for 18%
of Curo's total revenues in 2018.

Moody's expects the company to continue to generate solid
profitability over the next 12-18 months. Curo's strong earnings
represent a buffer against credit losses and other unforeseen
expenses, partially mitigating its weak capitalization with a
sizeable tangible common equity deficit, which represented 22% of
tangible assets as of year-end 2018. However, given the strength of
Curo's earnings, Moody's expects the company to reduce its tangible
equity deficit to single digits in the next 12-18 months.

WHAT COULD CHANGE RATINGS UP/DOWN

Curo's ratings could be upgraded if the company achieves positive
tangible capitalization through earnings retention while
maintaining a conservative financial policy, consistently strong
earnings, a well-managed asset quality, and sufficient liquidity.

Curo's ratings could be downgraded if the company's asset quality
weakens, leading to a meaningful deterioration in its earnings, or
if there is further evidence of weakness in internal controls, in
light of material weaknesses related to controls over financial
reporting disclosed in the company's 2018 financial statements. The
ratings could also be downgraded if the company incurs substantial
amounts of additional debt to pursue organic growth or a potential
acquisition. The ratings could also be downgraded in the event of
an adverse regulatory development, which would have a significant
adverse impact on the company's operations.


DATTA MANGLAM: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Datta Manglam Hospitality, LLC
           dba Knights Inn Kingsville
           fka Rodeway Inn - Kingsville
        5725 Richfield Park Court
        Rosharon, TX 77583

Business Description: Datta Manglam Hospitality, LLC owns a
                      hotel located at 3334 S. US 77, Kingsville,
                      Texas, valued by the Debtor a $343,160.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 29, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas (Houston)

Case No.: 19-31726

Judge: Hon. Eduardo V. Rodriguez

Debtor's Counsel: Margaret Maxwell McClure, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF MARGARETT M. MCCLURE
                  909 Fannin, Suite 3810
                  Houston, TX 77010
                  Tel: 713-659-1333
                  Fax: 713-658-0334
                  Email: margaret@mmmcclurelaw.com

Total Assets: $414,335

Total Liabilities: $1,096,519

The petition was signed by Rama S. Singh, managing member.

The Debtor filed an empty list of its 20 largest unsecured
creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb19-31726.pdf


DOYLESTOWN HOSPITAL: Moody's Confirms Ba1 Rating on $93MM Debt
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has confirmed Doylestown Hospital's (PA)
Ba1 rating, affecting approximately $93 million of rated debt
issued through the Doylestown Hospital Authority. The outlook is
stable. Today's action concludes the review for possible downgrade
initiated on December 18, 2018.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Confirmation of the Ba1 rating reflects our expectation that while
operations will remain strained, margins will stabilize at levels
consistent with year-to-date results as the hospital endeavors to
stem the fiscal 2018 operating loss. The Ba1 rating also
acknowledges Doylestown's strategies to maintain or grow its
leading market position in a favorable service area of Bucks
County, which will support stable volume trends and good revenue
growth. The hospital's absolute liquidity position has remained
stable and manageable capital spending plans should allow for
gradual growth. Credit challenges will include longer-term
durability of current stability in financial performance as most of
its payor contracts are value based arrangements, which creates
credit risk given Doylestown's high financial leverage, modest debt
service coverage and small size in an increasingly consolidating
market.

RATING OUTLOOK

The stable outlook reflects execution of bank documents that waived
the violation of the rating trigger and amended covenants to remove
the rating trigger on the Series 2013B bonds going forward. The
outlook considers an expectation of operating performance at least
in line with results through December 31, 2019, as well as
maintenance of liquidity and debt service coverage.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE

-- Material enterprise growth that leads to increased revenue and

    volume streams

-- Durable improvement in operating performance

-- Significant strengthening of balance sheet and debt coverage
    metrics

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE

-- Inability to sustain current levels of performance

-- Decline in unrestricted cash and investments

-- Deterioration in debt coverage metrics

-- Incremental increase in debt

LEGAL SECURITY

The obligated group is comprised of Doylestown Hospital, Pine Run
Retirement Community Center and a guaranty agreement from the
Foundation. The bonds are secured by a lien and security interest
in the hospitals gross revenues, a mortgage on the Hospitals acute
care facility, and a security interest in the Foundations gross
revenues.

Doylestown is subject to restrictive financial covenants measured
to the obligated group. Covenants under the newly amended Series
2013B bank documents include maintenance of a minimum 90 days cash
on hand, measured on June 30, 2019 on a trailing four quarter
basis, a minimum 95 days cash on hand, measured on December 31,
2019 on a trailing four quarter basis, and a minimum 100 days cash
on hand, measured semi-annually on each June 30 and December 31 on
a trailing for quarter basis, beginning June 30, 2020. Covenants
under the Master Trust Indenture (measured semi-annually at 12/31
and 6/30), include maintenance of a minimum 80 days cash on hand,
minimum 1.35 times annual debt service coverage, and equal to or
less than 66.6% debt to capitalization.

On March 14, 2019, Doylestown received a waiver for its rating
trigger covenant violation and simultaneously amended bank
documents for the Series 2013B bonds to remove the rating trigger
covenant.

PROFILE

With total annual revenue of approximately $342 million as of FYE
2018, Doylestown Hospital operates community focused healthcare
facilities serving patients in the northern suburban communities of
Philadelphia, including Bucks and Montgomery counties in
Pennsylvania and the town of Lambertville in New Jersey.


DUMITRU MEDICAL: May 13 Plan Confirmation Hearing
-------------------------------------------------
The disclosure statement explaining Dumitru Medical Center, PC, et
al.'s Chapter 11 Plan is granted preliminary approval.

The deadline to return ballots on the plan, as well as to file
objections to final approval of the adequacy of the information in
the disclosure statement and objections to confirmation of the plan
is May 6, 2019.

The hearing on objections to final approval of the adequacy of the
information in the disclosure statement and confirmation of the
plan will be held on May 13, 2019, at 11:00 a.m. before the
Honorable Mark A. Randon, United States Bankruptcy Judge, in
Courtroom 1825, 211 West Fort Street, Detroit, Michigan 48226.

                About Dumitru Medical Center

Dumitru Medical Center PC, Doctor One House Call Physicians PC and
their president Dumitru O. Sandulescu sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Lead Case No.
18-52936) on Sept. 21, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Mr. Sandulescu, DMC, estimated assets of
less than $1 million and liabilities of less than $1 million.
Doctor One estimated less than $1 million in assets and less than
$500,000 in liabilities.   

The Debtors tapped Lynn M. Brimer, Esq., at Strobl & Sharp, PC, as
their bankruptcy counsel.  Howard Hanna R.E.S. is the Debtors' real
estate broker.


EDEN HOME: Unsecureds to Get 100% Under Chapter 11 Plan
-------------------------------------------------------
Eden Home, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization and
accompanying disclosure statement.

Class 3 - General Unsecured Claims are unimpaired with estimated
amount of claims  $368,000.  Estimated recovery is 100%.  The
Debtor proposes that the Debtor or Reorganized Debtor will make
payment in Cash in the full amount to each Holder of an Allowed
General Unsecured Claim on or before the Distribution Date. The
Debtor reserves its rights, however, to dispute the validity of any
General Unsecured Claim, whether or not objected to by the Claims
Objection Deadline.

Class 1 - Bond Claims are impaired with estimated amount of claims
$59,024,419.50. On the Effective Date, the Claims on the Bonds (and
any Liens securing payment and performance of such Claims) shall be
affirmed, assumed and deemed Allowed by the Debtor and the
Reorganized Debtor, provided, however, that such Bond Claims shall
be subject to the terms and conditions of the Forbearance Agreement
and those terms are incorporated herein. The result of such
treatment hereunder is that the Bond Claims, any related Liens and
the Bond Documents shall pass through the Chapter 11 Case with the
same legal, equitable and contractual rights in existence prior to
the Petition Date.

The assets to be conveyed to the Reorganized Debtor will include,
but shall not be limited to, the following: (i) cash on hand on the
Effective Date; (ii) accounts receivable and the proceeds thereof
collected after the Effective Date; (iii) all Estate Causes of
Action not settled prior to Confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court;
(iv) all other tangible and intangible assets which constituted
property of the Estate under section 541 of the Bankruptcy Code as
of the Petition Date; and (v) all contractual rights in any
executory contract or unexpired lease it chooses to assume under
the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 21, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/yxbndrgn from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                     About Eden Home

Located in New Braunfels, Texas, Eden Home, Inc., d/b/a EdenHill
Communities -- https://www.edenhill.org/ -- is a not-for-profit,
faith-based organization that provides independent living,
affordable housing, assisted living, skilled nursing an
rehabilitation, long-term care and memory care services. The
EdenHill Communities Transportation Department provides ADA
services in support of seniors and individuals with disabilities.

Eden Home, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case
No. 18-50608) on March 16, 2018. In the petition signed by Laurence
P. Dahl, CEO and executive director, the Debtor estimated assets
and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.

Judge Craig A. Gargotta is the case judge.

Dykema Cox Smith is the Debtor's counsel; Langley & Banack, and
Gravely & Pearson, L.L.P., as special counsels; Cushman & Wakefield
as real estate broker. Cushman & Wakefield has entered into a
Co-Broker Agreement with CF Commercial Brokerage, LLC d/b/a San
Antonio Commercial Advisors.

On March 26, 2018, the U.S. Trustee appointed Susan N. Goodman as
the Patient Care Ombudsman in the case.

On May 30, 2018, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of
Eden Home, Inc. was appointed by the Bankruptcy Court. The
Committee retained Martin & Drought, P.C., as counsel.


EVOQUA WATER: S&P Assigns 'B' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issuer credit rating to Evoqua
Water Technologies Corp., the parent of EWT Holdings III Corp.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'B' issuer credit rating on EWT
Holdings III Corp. and its 'B' issue-level rating on the company's
first-lien credit facilities.

S&P's 'B' ratings on Evoqua and EWT (together, Evoqua) reflect its
forecast for a modest improvement in operating performance and
financial leverage over the next 12-18 months driven by the
company's outsourced water offering and the benefits of its
organizational realignment. The rating agency expects Evoqua's
leverage to modestly improve to the 5.0x-5.5x range in fiscal years
2019 and 2020 from around 5.7x in fiscal year 2018. Management
intends to focus on tuck-in acquisitions while reducing leverage
over the next few years, though S&P expects the company to remain
roughly as acquisitive as it has been in recent years. Although S&P
believes Evoqua may partially finance its future acquisitions with
debt, the rating agency forecasts that the company's leverage will
decline slightly as its performance improves.

"The stable outlook on Evoqua Water Technologies Corp. reflects our
expectation that its S&P Global-adjusted leverage will improve to
the 5.0x-5.5x range over the next 12-18 months. Our forecast
assumes that the company experiences modest organic growth
supplemented by contributions from its 2018 acquisitions and
incremental margin improvement from the rollout of Water One," S&P
said.

S&P could raise its ratings on Evoqua over the next 12 months if
the company reduces its leverage below 5x, by increasing its
earnings and/or paying down debt and the rating agency is confident
that the company and its financial sponsor are committed to
maintaining debt leverage of less than 5x. In order to raise the
rating, S&P would need to be confident that the company would be
less likely to undertake aggressive financial transactions such as
debt-financed dividends or large debt-funded acquisitions.

"Although unlikely given our expectation for EBITDA growth, we
could lower our ratings on Evoqua if the conditions in the
company's end markets deteriorate and reduce its revenue, if its
operating costs are higher than we expect, or if it completes
significant acquisitions that cause its forecast leverage to exceed
6.5x on a sustained basis," S&P said.


FAIRCHILD CORP: Court Upholds Ruling in Favor of New York State
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned FAIRCHILD CORPORATION, ET AL., Appellants, v.
STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, Claim No. 120486, 2016-03434 (N.Y.
App. Div.), claimants appeal from an order of the Court of Claims
dated Jan. 12, 2016. Claimants aim to recover damages for breach of
contract. The order denied the claimants' motion for summary
judgment on the issue of liability on so much of the claim as
alleged breach of contract and granted the defendant's cross-motion
for summary judgment dismissing so much of the claim as alleged
breach of contract.

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed
the Court of Claims' order.

The claimants, Fairchild Corporation and others were engaged in a
commercial real estate project located in Farmingdale in the
vicinity of Republic Airport. The site plan for the project
included an access point to Route 110 over a parcel of land
referred to as "Parcel No. 19," which was owned by the defendant.
Fairchild sought an easement from the defendant over Parcel 19 for
the access point to Route 110, and the parties discussed a possible
exchange of easements to achieve their goals.

Ultimately, Fairchild and the defendant entered into a written
agreement dated June 30, 2004. By Sept. 12, 2011, the defendant had
not granted the easement over Parcel 19. Accordingly, by letter of
that date, Fairchild demanded that the defendant effectuate the
subject easement. The demand did not receive a favorable response,
and Fairchild commenced this claim in October 2011, alleging, among
other things, that the defendant breached the agreement dated June
30, 2004, by failing to negotiate in good faith for the purpose of
formalizing a written easement over Parcel 19 and by failing to
effectuate the subject easement. Fairchild then moved for summary
judgment on the issue of liability on so much of the claim as
alleged breach of contract, and the defendant cross-moved for
summary judgment dismissing so much of the claim as alleged breach
of contract. The Court of Claims denied Fairchild's motion and
granted the defendant's cross motion, agreeing with the defendant's
contention, inter alia, that section 9 of the agreement amounted to
an unenforceable agreement to agree. Fairchild appeals.

Here, so much of Fairchild's claim as alleged breach of contract
accrued, at the very latest, in July 2010, when Fairchild filed a
complaint in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding seeking
compensatory damages against the defendant based on the same breach
of contract allegations asserted in this claim. Since the instant
claim was commenced more than six months after July 2010, so much
of the claim as alleged breach of contract was time-barred and
dismissal of so much of the claim was warranted.

In any event, even if so much of the claim as alleged breach of
contract had been timely, the defendant was entitled to summary
judgment dismissing so much of the claim. A written agreement that
is complete, clear, and unambiguous on its face must be enforced to
give effect to the meaning of its terms and the reasonable
expectations of the parties. However, an agreement to agree, in
which material terms are left for future negotiations, is generally
unenforceable. Here, the defendant demonstrated, prima facie, that
the plain and unambiguous terms of section 9 of the agreement
amounted to an agreement to negotiate in good faith the subject
easement over Parcel 19, and not an enforceable commitment
obligating the defendant to effectuate the subject easement. The
defendant also established that it had engaged in good faith
negotiations concerning the easement. In opposition to this prima
facie showing, Fairchild failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Accordingly, the Court agrees with the determination of the Court
of Claims to deny Fairchild's motion for summary judgment on the
issue of liability on so much of the claim as alleged breach of
contract and to grant the defendant's cross-motion for summary
judgment dismissing so much of the claim as alleged breach of
contract.

A copy of the Court's Decision and Order dated Feb. 6, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2JSU6kB from Leagle.com.

Anton J. Borovina, Melville, NY ( Joseph W. Bellacosa of counsel),
for appellants.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY ( Steven C. Wu and
David S. Frankel of counsel), for respondent.

              About Fairchild Corporation

Based in McLean, Virginia, The Fairchild Corporation (OTC: FCHD.PK)
-- http://www.fairchild.com/-- operated in two distinct divisions,
Fairchild Sports and Banner Aerospace Holding Company I, Inc.  In
addition to these two operating divisions, Fairchild owned several
parcels of real estate in Farmingdale, New York, which it had been
in the process of selling or developing. The Debtors' operations
were mainly centered on Fairchild Sports, which is a division of
the Debtors that concentrate primarily on protective apparel,
helmets and technical accessories for motorcyclists.

Fairchild and 60 of its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection
on March 18, 2009 (Bankr. D. Del Lead Case No. 09-10899).  Steven
J. Reisman, Esq., Timothy A. Barnes, Esq., and Veronique A. Hodeau,
Esq., at Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Cold & Mosle LLP, are bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtors.  Jason M. Madron, Esq., Michael J.
Merchant, Esq., and Mark D. Collins, Esq., at Richards, Layton &
Finger, P.A., serve as the Debtors' co-counsel.  On April 6, 2009,
Roberta A. DeAngelis, the Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3,
appointed three creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors of the Debtors.

In May 2009, Fairchild won authority to sell Banner Aerospace to
Greenwich AeroGroup Acquisition Corp., after an auction, for
$13,450,000 in cash plus assumption of certain liabilities.  In
December 2009, the Court confirmed Fairchild's bankruptcy-exit
plan, which provided for the orderly liquidation of its remaining
assets.  The liquidating trust established under the confirmed plan
is represented by Mary F. Caloway, Esq., and Mona A. Parikh, Esq.,
at Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, in Wilmington, Delaware; and
Neal L. Wolf, Esq., and Karen M. Borg, Esq., at Butler Rubin
Saltarelli & Boyd LLP, in Chicago, Illinois.


FG DINER: Additional Info on Plan's Source of Payments Disclosed
----------------------------------------------------------------
FG Diner Inc. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of New York a small business first amended disclosure
statement explaining its first amended plan dated March 25, 2019.

This latest filing discloses additional information on the plan's
source of payments. It provides that the Debtor's principals will
fund $25,000 of their $50,000 contribution prior to the date of
confirmation of the Plan. The balance of the contribution will be
funded over 12 months in the amount of $12,500 each from Mr. Andre
Gounaris and Mr. Athanasios Fatis. The Plan provides that in the
event that Mr. Gounaris or Mr. Fatis fail to make a monthly
contribution payment, that the Debtor will reduce their monthly
salary and make the contribution payment on their behalf. The
Debtor will serve as the disbursing agent and will make all
payments required under the Plan.

The amended plan also discloses additional risk factors:

   -- An additional risk factor is that the restaurant premises are
leased and if something happens that affects the Lease that would
impair the Debtor's ability to operate.

   -- Another potential risk is that a portion of the Plan is being
funded in the future by the Debtor's principals and there is risk
that they may not make the required payments. In that event, the
Plan provides that their salaries shall be reduced and the Debtor
shall make those payments on their behalf.

A redlined copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement dated
March 25, 2019 is available at http://tinyurl.com/y5859vadfrom
Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

                     About FG Diner Inc.

FG Diner Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-45884) on October 12, 2018.  At
the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had estimated
assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.

The case has been assigned to Judge Nancy Hershey Lord.  The Debtor
tapped Morrison Tenenbaum, PLLC as its legal counsel.


GLENWOOD PROPERTY: April 3 Mannion Auction of Brooklyn Property
---------------------------------------------------------------
Glenwood Property Management Corp. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of New York to authorize the sale of the
real property located at 1822 Glenwood Road, Brooklyn, New York,
free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances and interests, at
an auction to be conducted by Mannion Auctions, LLC on April 3,
2019.

In March 2010, the Debtor purchased the Property, subject to the
mortgage.  The Property is the subject of a foreclosure action
pending in the Kings County Supreme Court titled Bank of America,
NA v. Frank Morris, where a judgment was entered in favor of Bank
of America.

On March 7, 2019, the Court approved the Sale Procedures in
connection with the sale of the Property.  On March 11, 2019, the
Debtor's counsel served the Sale Procedures Order and Sale
Procedures on all creditors in the case, applicable governmental
offices, and those parties that expressed an interest in acquiring
the Property at the auction.  An auction for the sale of the
Property is scheduled for April 3, 2019 at 11:00 a.m.

Sound business reasons exist that justify the sale of the Property
outside the ordinary course of business and prior to the
confirmation of a reorganization plan.  Accordingly, the Court
should approve the sale.

A hearing on the Motion is set for April 3, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. (ET).
The objection deadline is March 27, 2019, at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

The Debtor asks that any order approving the sale of the Property
be effective immediately by providing that the stay under
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) is waived.

               About Glenwood Property Management

Glenwood Property Management Corp. is a fee simple owner of a real
property located at 1822 Glenwood Rd, Brooklyn, New York.  The
property is a one-unit rental property valued by the company at
$1.4 million.

Glenwood Property Management sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-42177) on April
19, 2018.  In the petition signed by Rose Solny, owner, the Debtor
disclosed $1.39 million in assets and $1.03 million in liabilities.
Judge Carla E. Craig oversees the case.  VOGEL BACH & HORN, LLP,
is the Debtor's counsel.

On Jan. 11, 2019, the Court appointed Mannion Auctions, LLC, as
auctioneer.



GO DADDY: Moody's Raises CFR to Ba2, Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded Go Daddy Operating Company,
LLC's Corporate Family Rating (CFR) to Ba2 from Ba3, Probability of
Default Rating (PDR) to Ba2-PD from Ba3-PD, and its senior secured
first lien credit facility (including revolving credit facility and
term loan) ratings to Ba2 from Ba3. Additionally, the Speculative
Grade Liquidity Rating (SGL) was affirmed at SGL-1. The ratings
outlook is stable.

The upgrade of GoDaddy's CFR to Ba2 reflects consistent track
record of strong revenue and earnings growth and double digit
percentage adjusted free cash to debt subsequent to the April 2017
Host Europe (HEG) acquisition. The upgrade also recognizes
GoDaddy's growing size and scale and the company's strong brand
presence and competitive standing relative to its peers. Moody's
expects GoDaddy will sustain organic topline growth around 10% with
a stable EBITDA margin and generate annual free cash flow in excess
of $550 million in 2019.

Moody's expects the company will manage its capital structure
prudently, balancing between accretive acquisitions to strengthen
its product portfolio and maintaining a measured approach toward
shareholder returns. Moody's expects the company will maintain free
cash flow-to-debt (Moody's adjusted) above 10% over the next 12-18
months and operate within management's long range targeted net debt
to cash EBITDA leverage of 2.0-4.0x.

Moody's took the following rating action on Go Daddy Operating
Company, LLC:

  - Corporate Family Rating, upgraded to Ba2 from Ba3

  - Probability of Default Rating, upgraded to Ba2-PD from Ba3-PD

  - $200 million senior secured revolving credit facility due 2022,
upgraded to Ba2 (LGD3) from Ba3 (LGD3)

  - $2,489 million senior secured first lien term loan due 2024,
upgraded to Ba2 (LGD3) from Ba3 (LGD3)

  - Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, affirmed at SGL-1

Outlook Action:

  - Ratings Outlook Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba2 CFR reflects GoDaddy's solid free cash flow and earnings
growth, strong brand in the US with growing international presence,
and its position as the largest domain name registrar and a leading
web-hosting services provider. The rating is further supported by
GoDaddy's growing scale and recurring revenues derived from high
customer retention rates that have exceeded 85% over the last five
years. Moody's expects GoDaddy to maintain balanced financial
policies between creditor and equity holder interests and to remain
within management's long term net debt to cash EBITDA target of
2.0-4.0x (as defined by the company; 2.2x at December 31, 2018).
Moody's also projects GoDaddy's will generate annual free cash flow
in excess of $550 million in 2019 and maintain free cash flow to
debt (Moody's adjusted) above 10%.

Conversely, GoDaddy's rating is constrained by its moderately high
financial leverage, estimated at around 4.6 times gross
debt-to-EBITDA (Moody's adjusted) at December 31, 2018, which is
projected to decline below 4.0 times over the next 12-18 months
through earnings growth. Because GoDaddy is currently at the low
end of their leverage target range, uses of cash will likely become
more aggressive than over the last year including acquisitions and
share repurchases. To that end, the board recently approved a $500
million share buyback program. The rating also incorporates the
company's operations within the mature and intensely competitive
web-services industry that has low barriers to entry, an operating
margin that trails rated industry peers, as well as potential for
debt-funded acquisitions.

Moody's expects GoDaddy to have very good liquidity over the next
12-18 months as reflected in the SGL-1 rating. The company's
liquidity is supported by solid cash balances (including short-term
investments) of $951 million as of December 2018, and Moody's
expectation for annual free cash flow in excess of $550 million in
2019 along with full availability under its $200 million revolving
credit facility expiring in 2022. These cash sources provide very
good coverage of required term loan amortization that is modest at
approximately $25 million annually. There are no financial
maintenance covenants under the term loan but borrowings under the
revolving credit agreement are subject to a maximum net
debt-to-EBITDA leverage ratio of 5.75x if utilization exceeds 35%
of the maximum capacity. Moody's does not expect the company to
utilize its revolving credit facility over the next 12-18 months
and there is significant cushion within the required leverage ratio
if the covenant is triggered.

While unlikely over the next two years, GoDaddy's ratings could be
upgraded if the company were able to maintain strong organic
topline and earnings growth, meaningfully increase scale and
diversification and management establishes a more conservative
financial policy.

The ratings could be downgraded if the revenue growth rate
decelerates, market share weakens, subscriber churn increases, or
free cash flow declines below 10% of total debt for an extended
period of time from weakening operating performance or aggressive
financial policies.

GoDaddy Operating Company, LLC, is an indirect subsidiary of
publicly-traded GoDaddy, Inc. GoDaddy, Inc. is a leading provider
of domain name registration, web hosting and other services to
small business. GoDaddy generated revenues of approximately $2.7
billion in fiscal year ended December 2018.


GOSPEL WAY: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
---------------------------------------------
Debtor: Gospel Way Deliverance Ministries, Inc.
           dba Gospel Way Church of God
        1060 Utica Avenue
        Brooklyn, NY 11203

Business Description: Gospel Way Deliverance Ministries is a tax-
                      exempt religious organization in Brooklyn,
                      New York.
                      
Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 28, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn)

Case No.: 19-41850

Judge: Hon. Nancy Hershey Lord

Debtor's Counsel: Alvin J. Thomas, Esq.
                  ALVIN J. THOMAS, ESQUIRE
                  10 Fiske Place, Suite 417
                  Mount Vernon, NY 10550
                  Tel: (917) 584-7678
                  Email: alvinjthomaslaw@aol.com

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Donald Burris, president.

The Debtor stated it has no unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb19-41850.pdf


HAMPSTEAD GLOBAL: Case Summary & 18 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Hampstead Global, LLC
        520 White Plains Rd, Suite 500
        Tarrytown, NY 10591

Business Description: Hampstead Global is a privately held
                      company in Tarrytown, New York.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 30, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of New York (White Plains)

Case No.: 19-22721

Judge: Hon. Robert D. Drain

Debtor's Counsel: Charles A. Higgs, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF CHARLES A. HIGGS
                  115 E. 23rd Street, Ste 3rd FL
                  New York, NY 10010
                  Tel: 917-673-3768
                  Email: Charles@Freshstartesq.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Adam Perzow, sole member.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 18 unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb19-22721_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb19-22721.pdf


HAROLD LEE HOLDEN: BONY Has Valid Right to Lien, Court Affirms
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned AROLD LEE HOLDEN, Plaintiff, v. THE BANK OF
NEW YORK MELLON, Defendant, Case No. 18-cv-02037-BLF (N.D. Cal.),
Chapter 11 debtor Harold Lee Holden appeals the bankruptcy court's
judgment in an adversary proceeding brought against Appellees the
Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York and BONY's
servicer, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing. Through this proceeding,
Holden asked the bankruptcy court to hold that BONY's lien on
Holden's residence is invalid. The bankruptcy court granted summary
judgment for BONY in the adversary proceeding after determining
that BONY has a valid right to the lien and thus standing to
enforce the lien.

After considering the parties' briefing, the admissible evidence,
and the relevant legal authorities, District Judge Beth Labson
Freeman affirms the judgment of the bankruptcy court.

The bankruptcy court concluded that Appellees have a valid right to
the Note and Deed of Trust under Commercial Code section 3301
(i.e., the first issue presented), so it declined to reach the
question of whether Appellees have a valid right because Mortgage
Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS") validly assigned the
Note and Deed of Trust to Appellees (i.e., the second issue
presented). In his brief, Holden raises several arguments that he
did not raise below as to why Appellees do not have standing
pursuant to section 3301. Appellees argue that Holden waived these
arguments by not arguing them below. The Court need not determine
whether these arguments are waived because, the Court holds that
Appellees have standing to enforce the Note and Deed of Trust based
on a valid assignment of those documents to Appellees by MERS.

The Court agrees with Appellees that California courts have held
that the role of MERS under deeds of trusts clearly confers upon
MERS the authority to assign a deed and any associated notes. The
Deed of Trust here grants MERS rights as the beneficiary of the
instrument and nominee of Aegis, including the right to "exercise
any of [the] interests [in the Security Instrument], including, but
not limited to, the right to foreclose and sell the Property, and
to take any action required of [Aegis, as Lender] including, but
not limited to, releasing and cancelling this Security Instrument."
Several California courts have held that this exact language
clearly and unmistakably grants MERS the right to assign the deed
of trust.

In sum, the Court holds that MERS had the authority to and did
validly assign the Deed of Trust and the Note to BONY. As such,
BONY has standing to enforce the loan on Holden's residence. The
judgment of the bankruptcy court is affirmed.

A copy of the Court's Order dated Feb. 5, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2CGgOpN from Leagle.com.

Harold Lee Holden, Appellant, represented by Yasha Rahimzadeh, Law
Offices of Yasha Rahimzadeh & Richard L. Antognini, Law Office of
Richard L. Antognini.

The Bank of New York Mellon, As Trustee Mort. Pass-Through Cert.
Series 2006-3, Shell Point Mortgage Servicing & Central Profolio
Control, Inc., Appellees, represented by Robert Zahradka, Tiffany &
Bosco, p.a.

Harold Lee Holden filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-11895) on May 11, 2017, and is
represented by Peter L Nisson, Esq. of Nisson & Nisson.


HEARTLAND PROPERTIES: Case Summary & 7 Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Heartland Properties Community Trust
        1701 E. 29th Street
        Sioux Falls, SD 57104

Business Description: Heartland Properties Community Trust
                      is a business trust headquartered in
                      Sioux Falls, South Dakota.  The Debtor
                      previously sought bankruptcy protection
                      on May 31, 2018 (Bankr. D. S.D. Case No.
                      18-40269).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 30, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of South Dakota (Southern (Sioux Falls))

Case No.: 19-40117

Judge: Hon. Charles L. Nail, Jr.

Debtor's Counsel: Robert L. Meadors, Esq.
                  BRENDE & MEADORS LLP
                  P.O. Box 1024
                  Sioux Falls, SD 57101-1024
                  Tel: 605-333-0070
                  Fax: 605-333-0121
                  Email: rlm@bsmllp.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Caleb Walsh, trustee.

A copy of the Debtor's list of seven unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/sdb19-40117_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/sdb19-40117.pdf


HELIX ACQUISITION: Moody's Rates $50MM First Lien Term Loan 'B2'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B2 rating to Helix Acquisition
Holdings, Inc.'s proposed $50 million senior secured first lien
term loan due 2024. All existing ratings remain unchanged at this
time, including the B3 Corporate Family Rating, B2 rating on the
senior secured bank credit facility, consisting of a revolving
credit facility due 2022 and term loan also due 2024, and the Caa2
rating on the senior secured second lien term loan due 2025. The
proposed term loan will not be fungible with the existing first
lien term loan facility but will be subject to terms consistent
with the existing credit agreement, except for pricing.

Proceeds of the new term loan along with $8 million of revolver
borrowings and $24 million of sponsor cash equity will be used
primarily to finance an acquisition of a manufacturer of small
precision components used primarily in medical applications and, to
a lesser extent, the aerospace & defense markets. The acquisition
is credit negative because it continues the company's aggressive
acquisition push that is keeping leverage high and contributing to
negative free cash flow. Moody's is nevertheless taking no action
on the B3 CFR and stable rating outlook because continued revenue
growth and reduction in integration costs as past acquisitions are
assimilated will reduce leverage and lead to positive free cash
flow over the next year.

The following rating action was taken:

Assignments:

Issuer: Helix Acquisition Holdings, Inc.

Senior secured first lien term loan due 2024, at B2 (LGD3)

RATINGS RATIONALE

MWI's B3 CFR reflects high financial leverage for the operating
profile, cyclical exposure, and the competitive markets for its
products. The proposed transaction will bring funded debt to
roughly $665 million, resulting in debt/EBITDA that approaches 7x
pro forma (after Moody's standard adjustments). Moody's anticipates
leverage to remain elevated for some time amidst moderating
industrial and macroeconomic growth and margin pressure from labor
and commodity cost headwinds, including the potential further
impact of tariffs and ongoing uncertainty with US trade
negotiations. Margins are also susceptible to pricing pressure in
the competitive environment. Event risk is high with private equity
ownership, noting also the company is acquisitive and has increased
funded debt levels to make acquisitions since its September 2017
LBO. Moody's believes that free cash flow generation will remain
negative or negligible at least over the next six months but
improve and turn positive over the next year as capital spending is
anticipated to moderate and acquisition synergies are realized. The
company also should generate moderately higher revenue and earnings
from its existing businesses, benefiting from supportive key end
markets and pricing initiatives. The ratings are weakly positioned
until the company reduces leverage and demonstrates a track record
of positive free cash flow generation.

MWI has modest revenue scale in a fragmented industry and high
product concentration. Moody's also believes acquisitions are
likely to continue given limited organic growth in the fragmented
landscape and present integration risks. The company's end market
diversification, longstanding customer and distributor
relationships, and product customization that minimizes churn rates
are positive credit considerations.

The stable outlook incorporates expectation of supportive end
markets to drive organic top line growth at least in the low single
digit range and incremental earnings over the next year, aided by
cost efficiencies, ongoing lean initiatives and acquisition
synergies. Moody's also expects MWI to have at least adequate
liquidity, with free cash flow turning positive within 6 to-12
months and improving thereafter, and debt-to-EBITDA leverage
declining to a low 6x range within the next year. Ample
availability under the $70 million revolving credit facility ($8
million drawn pro forma for the transaction) and the covenant lite
structure also support adequate liquidity and coverage for the $1.3
million required quarterly term loan amortization.

The B2 rating on the first lien credit facilities, one notch above
the CFR, reflects their higher priority of claim in the collateral
and the first-loss support provided by the second lien term loan in
a default scenario. The Caa2 rating on the second lien term loan,
two notches below the CFR, reflects the subordination of the lien
on the collateral to the lien held by first lien lenders in the
event of a default.

The ratings could be downgraded with a deterioration in the
company's liquidity including lower than expected or sustained
negative free cash flow generation, or a reliance on revolver
borrowings. Worsening business conditions and expected declines in
organic revenues or margins, or weakening credit metrics including
a lack of progress in reducing debt-to-EBITDA leverage to below
6.5x on a sustained basis or if EBITA/interest is sustained below
1.5x, would also drive downward ratings pressure. Acquisitions or
shareholder returns that sustain or increase leverage would also
pressure the ratings.

Upward ratings momentum could develop should the company grow while
maintaining or improving margins and apply free cash flow toward
debt reduction beyond required amortization, such that Moody's
expects Debt/EBITDA to approach the low 5.0x range and
EBITA/interest above 2.0x on a sustained basis. MWI would also need
to maintain good liquidity.

The principal methodology used in this rating was Global
Manufacturing Companies published in June 2017.

Helix Acquisition Holdings, Inc., through its principal holding
operating subsidiary, MWI Holdings, Inc., based in Rosemont,
Illinois, is a manufacturer and designer of engineered compression
and other springs, fasteners, and precision components across
diverse end-markets. American Securities LLC acquired the company
for approximately $820 million in September 2017. Revenues were
about $406 million as of LTM December 31, 2018.


HOUTEX BUILDERS: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
-----------------------------------------------------
Houtex Builders, LLC, 2203 Looscan Lane, LLC, and 415 Shadywood,
LLC, propose a Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation and
accompanying disclosure statement.

Houtex General Unsecured Claims are impaired. Holders of Allowed
Houtex General Unsecured Claims shall be treated as follows: each
holder of an Allowed Houtex General Unsecured Claim shall receive
its pro rata distribution of the following: (i) the Independent
Bank Certificate of Deposit, (ii) the proceeds of the Lynbrook sale
after satisfaction of the Houtex DIP Claim, the CommunityBank
Secured Claim and all closing costs for the Lynbrook sale including
payment of property taxes, broker’s commissions and other
customary closing costs, and (iii) the Houtex Remnant Assets after
satisfaction of all costs incurred for the maintenance and
liquidation of the Remnant Assets as will be further detailed in
the Liquidating Trust Agreement.

Shadywood General Unsecured Claims are impaired. Holders of Allowed
Shadywood General Unsecured Claims shall receive a pro-rata
distribution of the proceeds of the Shadywood Remnant Assets if the
proceeds are greater than the Shadywood DIP Claim amount, if the
proceeds are less than or equal to the Shadywood DIP Claim amount,
then the holders of Shadywood General Unsecured Claims shall
receive nothing on account of their claims.

Looscan General Unsecured Claims are impaired. Holders of Allowed
Looscan General Unsecured Claims shall receive a pro-rata
distribution of the proceeds of the Looscan Remnant Assets if the
proceeds are greater than the Looscan DIP Claim amount, if the
proceeds are less than or equal to the Looscan DIP Claim amount,
then the holders of Looscan General Unsecured Claims shall receive
nothing on account of their claims.

Spirit of Texas Bank Secured Claim are impaired. The holder of the
Spirit of Texas Bank shall receive the following: (i) no later than
fifteen (15) days after the Confirmation Date, all of the remaining
proceeds of the sale of Thornblade plus the certificate of deposit
at Spirit of Texas in the amount of $252,000.00, (ii) no later than
seven (7) days after the liquidation of the Nored Note, the
proceeds of the Nored Note, and (iii) a Houtex General Unsecured
Claim for any portion of the Spirit of Texas Bank Secured Claim
that is not satisfied by (i) and (ii) (the "Spirit of Texas Bank
Deficiency Claim"). At any time, Spirit of Texas Bank may waive its
entitlement to the proceeds of the Nored Note by sending written
notification of such waiver to Houtex or the Liquidating Trustee
and in such case the Nored Note will be liquidated for the benefit
of all the Houtex General Unsecured Creditors and the Spirit of
Texas Bank Deficiency Claim will be determined by just taking into
account the distribution of property.

Great Southwest Financial Corporation Claim are impaired. The
holder of the Great Southwest Financial Corporation Claim shall
receive a Houtex General Unsecured Claim in the amount of
$387,254.71.

Houtex shall pay Spirit of Texas Bank the Thornblade Sale
Proceeds.

Houtex shall continue its efforts to sell the Lynbrook House. As a
condition precedent to the Effective Date of the Plan, Houtex shall
have sold the Lynbrook House.

On or after the Confirmation Date, Spirit of Texas Bank shall be
entitled to set off the Spirit of Texas Bank Certificate of Deposit
in the approximate amount of $252,000 against the Spirit of Texas
Bank Secured Claim.

Houtex holds a Certificate of Deposit in the amount of
approximately $250,000 at Independent Bank, which shall be
distributed pro rata to Houtex General Unsecured Creditors pursuant
to the terms hereof.

The Nored Note will either be provided to Spirit of Texas Bank or
it will be contributed to the Liquidating Trust depending on the
election of Spirit of Texas Bank.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 21, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y48nkr2tfrom PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

The Plan was filed by Charles M. Rubio, Esq., and Michael D. Fritz,
Esq., in Houston, Texas, on behalf of Houtex Builders, LLC; 2203
Looscan Lane, LLC; and 415 Shadywood, LLC.

                   About HouTex Builders

Located at 17 Courtlandt Place, Houston, Texas 77006, HouTex
Builders, LLC, and affiliates 415 Shadywood, LLC and 2203 Looscan
Lane, LLC are privately held companies engaged in activities
related to real estate.  2203 Looscan, LLC and 415 Shadywood, LLC,
are special purpose entities established for the purpose of
constructing new houses.  2203 Looscan, LLC and 415 Shadywood, LLC
are each owned 100% by Charles C. Foster and Lily Foster.

HouTex Builders, LLC, 415 Shadywood, LLC, and 2203 Looscan Lane,
LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
18-34658) on Aug. 23, 2018.  In the petitions signed by Charles C.
Foster, manager, the Debtors each estimated assets and liabilities
in the range of $1 million to $10 million and in the range of $1
million to $10 million.

Judge Jeffrey P. Norman presides over the cases.

The Debtors tapped Charles M. Rubio, Esq., at Diamond McCarthy,
LLP, as counsel.


INSCOPE INTERNATIONAL: Infinisource Buying All Assets for $5.2M
---------------------------------------------------------------
InScope International, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia to authorize the bidding procedures in
connection with the sale of substantially all assets to
Infinisource Consulting Solutions, Inc. for $5.2 million, plus
incentive payments for two years if certain revenue milestones are
achieved, subject to higher and better offers.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor engaged Cornhusker Capital,
LLC to represent and assist the Debtor in identifying interested
parties to provide financing or funding to the Debtor by means of
any debt, equity or business combination.  Despite Cornhusker's
extensive marketing efforts, the Debtor was unable to attract a
potential suitor prior to the filing of the Bankruptcy Case.  
Since the filing of the Bankruptcy Case, Cornhusker has had active
interest by six potential purchasers.

On March 8, 2018, the Debtor entered into a Letter of Intent
("LOI") with the Purchaser for the sale of substantially all the
Debtor's contract assets, as follows: (i) Department of Energy
(GS-35F-0048R), (ii) Department of Justice (I5JA0518P00000550),
(iii) Task Order 89303018FET400006, (iv) GSA Schedule No.
47QTCA18D0079, (v) Volkswagen Agreement effective Sept. 5, 2018,
(vi) Acumen Solutions (MSA), (viii) FINRA Agreement No.
CORP-0002845, (ix) Freddie Mac Master Agreement, (x) Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System SOA 201400405, (xi) AARP
Supplier Agreement, and (xi) College Board Master Services
Agreement & Amendments.

The Debtor, in the exercise of its business judgment, has accepted
the Purchaser as a "stalking horse bidder" and, has agreed to
provide the Purchaser with certain protections customarily afforded
stalking horse bidders in comparable situations.  The Debtor and
the Purchaser will enter into an Asset Purchase Agreement as soon
as reasonably practicable, with the understanding that time is of
the essence.

As set forth in greater detail in the LOI, the proposed transaction
generally provides for the following:

     (a) Assets to be Purchased: The dentified contracts and all
rights related thereto

     (b) Purchase Price: $5.2 million, plus incentive payments for
two years if certain revenue milestones are achieved

     (c) Earnest Money Deposit: $520,000 (initial deposit).

     (d) Asset Purchase Agreement: The Purchaser and the Debtor
will have three business days after the entry of the Bid Procedures
Order to enter into an Asset Purchase Agreement

     (e) Break-Up Fee: $200,000 (equal to approximately 4% of the
Purchase Price)

     (f) Expense Reimbursement: All reasonably documented
out-of-pocket costs, subject to a cap of $100,000

     (g) Contracts: The Debtor will assume and assign all contracts
to the Purchaser.  Any cure claim obligations will be the
responsibility of the Debtor and paid at closing.

     (h) Closing Conditions: Entry of an order by the Bankruptcy
Court approving the sale of the Assets to the Purchaser; receipt of
financing by the Purchaser; entry into a consulting or employment
agreement by Michael G. Bruce, the Debtor's CEO, with the
Purchaser; approval of novation of all the acquired contracts by
the applicable agency or entity.

     (i) Subject to Higher/Better Offers: The proposed sale is
subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court, which may approve a
competing higher and/or better offer to purchase the Assets.

     (j) Closing Date: To be determined, with the understanding
that time is of the essence, provided, however, the sale of the
Assets will close no later than May 7, 2019.

The Debtor submits that a sale, with competitive bidding, affords
the best opportunity to the maximize value of the Assets, and is in
the best interest of the Debtor's estate, creditors and other
interested parties.  All of the Debtor's right, title and interest
in and to the Assets will be sold free and clear of all liens and
encumbrances, with all such liens and encumbrances being satisfied
at closing or attaching to the net proceeds of the sale.

The principal elements of the Bid Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: April 4, 2019

     b. Initial Bid: $5.2 million, plus (i) the break-up fee in the
amount of $200,000, (ii) Expense Reimbursement subject to a cap of
$100,000, and (iii) the initial minimum overbid increment of
$50,000

     c. Deposit: 10% of the proposed purchase price

     d. Auction: In the event that at least two Qualified Bids
(including the LOI) are received by the Debtor by the Opening Bid
Deadline, the Debtor will conduct an Auction.  The Auction, if any,
will be held on April 8, 2019 at 1:00 p.m. at the law offices of
Hirschler Fleischer, 8270 Greensboro Drive, Suite 700, Tysons,
Virginia 22102 or such later time and place as the Debtor will
designate in a subsequent notice to all Qualified Bidders.  The
bidding will start at the amount offered in the highest Qualified
Bid as determined by the Debtor, in consultation with its
professionals and the Notice Parties.

     e. Bid Increments: $50,000

     f. Sale Hearing: April 10, 2019

     g. Sale Objection Deadline: April 3, 2019

The Debtor proposes to serve the Sale and Bid Procedures Notice
within three business days after entry of the Bid Procedures Order
on the parties described.

The Debtor believes it can demonstrate at the Sale Hearing that all
requirements for assumption and/or assignment of the contracts will
be satisfied and that the parties to the contracts will have
consented to such assignment.

Pursuant to the Motion, the Debtor asks that the Court enters the
Bid Procedures Order, among other things: (a) approving bid
procedures for the sale of substantially all Assets; (b)
authorizing and scheduling an auction to sell the Assets;  (c)
scheduling a hearing on approval of the sale of all Assets free and
clear of liens, claims, encumbrances and other interests; (d)
authorizing the assumption and assignment of certain executory
contracts in conjunction with the sale; (e) approving certain
deadlines and the form, manner, and sufficiency of notice of the
foregoing; and (f) granting other related relief.

A copy of the LOI and the Bidding Procedures attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/InScope_International_92_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser:

        INFINISOURCE CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, INC.
        201 Loudoun St. SE, Suite 200
        Leesburg, VA 20175
        Telephone: (571) 291-3336
        Facsimile: (703) 651-5510
     
                   About InScope International

InScope International, Inc. --
https://www.inscopeinternational.com/ -- provides management,
scientific, and technical consulting services.  It combines
technology and staffing expertise to serve clients that address
complex issues in both the private and public sectors.  Since 2002,
InScope has grown its expertise from a specialized, regional
technology staffing firm to a diversified consulting and
integration company.  

InScope International sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 19-10230) on Jan. 23,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $1 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.
The case is assigned to Judge Klinette H. Kindred.  

Hirschler Fleischer PC is the Debtor's legal counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtor's case on March 1, 2019.  The
committee tapped Kevin M. O'Donnell, Esq., at Henry & O'Donnell,
P.C., as its legal counsel.


JESSELYN RADACK: Renewed Bid to Move Fitzgibbon Suit Venue Junked
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned TREVOR FITZGIBBON, Plaintiff, v. JESSELYN A.
RADACK, Defendant, Civil Action No. 3:18-cv-247 (E.D. Va.), Senior
District Judge Robert E. Payne denied Radack's renewed motion to
transfer venue.

Trevor Fitzgibbon instituted the action against Radack, claiming
that she maliciously prosecuted and defamed him by falsely accusing
him of sexual assault.

After the pre-trial conference and after she had filed various
other motions, Radack instituted a bankruptcy action under Chapter
11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia. She then filed a
notice of removal to remove this case to the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, but the
bankruptcy judge held that this removal was improper. Thus, the
action was remanded back to this Court.

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 362, this action was stayed with
respect to Radack because she instituted the bankruptcy action.
Further, Radack filed a motion to transfer the case.

Section 1404 (a) says, "For the convenience of parties and
witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may
transfer any civil action to any other district or division where
it might have been brought or to any district or division to which
all parties have consented." The first inquiry is whether the
claims "might have been brought" in the transferee forum. After
that, the Court must consider and balance various factors to
determine whether a transfer is warranted.  The factors to be
considered for a section 1404 (a) motion are: "(1) the weight
accorded to plaintiff's choice of venue; (2) witness convenience
and access; (3) convenience of the parties; and (4) the interest of
justice."

The Court finds that Fitzgibbon's choice of forum does not carry
its usual strong weight here, because Fitzgibbon does not live in
Virginia and because the underlying facts did not occur here.
However, Fitzgibbon's choice of forum is nonetheless entitled to
significant weight because Fitzgibbon resided in Richmond, Virginia
during the relevant events and most of his witnesses live in and
around the Richmond. And, the effects of the allegedly defamatory
remarks were felt in this forum. Thus, there is a substantial
connection to the forum that logically supports Fitzgibbon's
decision to bring the case here.

The second factor to be weighed is the convenience to the parties
in litigating in either venue. The Court finds that this factor
weighs slightly in favor of Radack because of Radack's medical
condition and because Fitzgibbon has failed to state any reason why
it would be more difficult for him to travel to the District of
Columbia rather than Richmond.

On the third factor, the burden of showing that the forum is
inconvenient for witnesses is upon Radack, and she has failed to
carry her burden. The Court has been given no information that any
witness located in or around the District of Columbia will be
burdened by coming to Richmond, and Radack has failed to provide
any information about her witnesses' expected testimony. Further,
transferring the case to the District of Columbia will essentially
benefit Radack at the expense of Fitzgibbon. So, this factor weighs
in favor of Fitzgibbon.

Finally, Radack has not shown why this Court would be unable to
apply the substantive law of the District of Columbia. Indeed,
there is nothing unique about Fitzgibbon's substantial claims that
would make it difficult for any district court to apply the
governing law. Radack has not explained what circumstances would
require a visit to the locations of the alleged events. And, the
Court does not foresee any need for a visit. Thus in the Court's
view, the interest of justice does not warrant transfer.

In sum, even though the Court finds that Radack may have some
difficulty getting to Richmond due to her health condition, that
factor does not outweigh Fitzgibbon's choice of forum, the
convenience of the witnesses, or the interests of justice. At best,
the factors are at "dead center," which is not enough for Radack to
fulfill her burden of proving that a transfer is warranted. That is
not enough to meet Radack's burden.

A copy of the Court's Order dated Feb. 6, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2WtU7wC from Leagle.com.

Trevor Fitzgibbon, Plaintiff, represented by Steven Scott Biss.

Jesselyn A. Radack, Defendant, represented by D. Margeaux Thomas,
The Thomas Law Office PLC & Jeffrey Marc Sherman --
jeffreymsherman@gmail.com -- Law Offices of Jeffrey M Sherman.

Jesselyn Radack filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D.D.C. Case No. 18-00634) on Sept. 23, 2018, and is represented by
Jeffrey M. Sherman, Esq. of the Law Offices of Jeffrey M.
Sherman. 


JIN KIM: Paddy Buying Duluth Property for $475K
-----------------------------------------------
Jin H. Kim asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Maryland to authorize the sale of the real property located at 2645
N. Berkley Lake Road, Units 116-119, Duluth, Georgia to Joanne
Paddy for $475,000.

The Debtor owns four commercial condominiums in Duluth Georgia Fund
has been engaged in litigation with the assignee of the lender on
the commercial obligations for some time.  These are situated
within the Property representing four commercial condominium units
in a larger development.

Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC holds a secured claim and lien against
the Property.  For over a decade, this was a "wasteland" project
was constructed but not finished internally at the fall of Lehman
Brothers and the entire economy in 2008 intruded on progress for
nearly a decade.  As the Debtor has noted in prior filings, the
developments have emerged and final construction is ongoing. The
complex is the subject of a large Asian spa which will become
finalized in December 2018, such that leasing will pick up
substantially in the nearby units (which include those owned by the
Debtor) in the early months of 2019.

The Debtor and Bayview have been involved in disputes which
preceded the Petition Date herein, including a civil suit by
Bayview against the Debtor in the U.S. District Court of Maryland
[Case No. 1:16-cv-03583-BPG] for collections and related relief.
In the Chapter 11 case, the Debtor and Bayview have negotiated in
good faith and attempted to resolve their disputes with minimal
litigation.   

The Debtor kept Bayview at arms-length with several motions to
extend exclusivity.  Bayview has filed on Nov. 28, 2018 a Motion
for Relief From Stay, to which Debtor filed an Answer on Dec. 12,
2018.  Hearings were continued, and following the resolution of the
disputes by and between Bayview and Debtor on the terms of a
Settlement Agreement, which was annexed to the 4001(d) Notice filed
by Bayview, and is a matter of record.   

In order to successfully reorganize, the Debtor has determined that
it is necessary to sell the Property.  In accordance with the
aforementioned Settlement Agreement, the Debtor has received a
contract of sale on the Property, dated Feb. 12, 2019, but ratified
on March 8, 2019.

The material terms and conditions and disclosures relating to the
Contract are that:  Firstly, this is an insider purchase of the
Property by the Debtor's wife, the Purchaser.  Secondly, the
purchase price is $475,000 which includes the Building, Land,
Equipment and Improvements in connection with the Property.  There
is a $25,000 increase in the purchase price if the sale does not
timely close, but rather closes at least 48 hours prior to any
scheduled foreclosure.   Thirdly, the Property has been valued by
the Debtor at $500,000 and at $350,000 to $315,000 by Bayview.
Fourth, the Property is being purchased "as is."  Fifth, a deposit
is being held by counsel for the Debtor in the amount of $20,000 to
be applied against the purchase price in the event of closing, and
otherwise it is applied to the estate.  Sixth, this is a cash offer
and purchase price, and the Purchaser is required to cover all
incidental charges at the settlement such as taxes, settlement
closing costs, any transfer taxes (no proration), and she will take
the Property subject to any condo fees or she may pay them.
Seventh, the Contract must be approved by the Bankruptcy Court on
April 3, 2019, or Purchaser may cancel.  Eighth, Purchaser has
until March 15, 2019 to obtain a title commitment, and until March
20, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. to terminate the Contract for any title
matters by written notice to the Debtor.   Ninth, among items to be
identified for litigation is a termination of the prior realtor's
capacity and listing; and a lien avoidance/Section 522(f) filing as
to the Condo fees (pre-petition) for which no claim has been filed
in the Chapter 11 case and for which a judgment lien exists solely
in rem.  Tenth, a Motion to Sell Free and Clear is required to be
filed to approve the Contract.  Eleventh, closing is to occur on
April 15, 2019 on the terms of the second sub-paragraph hereof, or
on the terms set forth therein if closing is to occur 48 hours
prior to any scheduled foreclosure sale.  Twelfth, no brokerage
commissions exist on the Contract as no broker was the procuring
source of the Purchaser.  Thirteenth, the property description is
annexed as Exhibit A to the Contract.  Fourteenth, the Contract is
governed by Maryland law (without regard to conflict of laws
provisions) and the United States Bankruptcy Code.  Fifteenth,
although the Contract provides neither Debtor nor Purchaser have
consulted their respective counsel as to tax implications of the
proposed transaction, the Purchaser may formulate an allocation
basis for the transaction following the filing of the Motion
pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Section 1060.

The Debtor will file a Chapter 11 Plan that adopts the Contract and
the Motion, and provides for further payments on allowed claims
herein so that the plan may be substantially consummated in a
reasonable time.  The conditions and amount of the proposed
Contract are the highest and best terms of any proposal offered to
the Debtor for the purchase of the Property.  Although a real
estate broker was retained for lease and/or sale, the broker
provided no contracts and found no buyers or tenants during the
duration of that engagement.   

The Debtor as the owner of the Property believes the purchase price
of $475,000 is a fair and reasonable price for the Property.

Further, pursuant to the requirements of Local Rule 6004-1, the
following disclosures are made:

      a. The scheduled value of the Property is $500,000 (which was
based upon an opinion of value by the Debtor's principal as owner)
and the Contract's value is $475,000 for a timely closing for all
assets purchased by the Purchaser.   

      b. The Purchaser's identity is Joanne Paddy which is an
insider purchaser -- being the Debtor's wife.  The Purchaser was
exclusively procured through the Debtor.  There is no other
procuring source.

      c. The consideration to be paid by the Purchaser is $475,000
plus costs and other charges, if any, of the transaction, such that
Bayview receives as a result of the closing on or before April 15,
2019 the sum of $475,000, or $500,000 to be received by Bayview if
closing occurs after April 15, 2019, but before 48 hours in advance
of a scheduled foreclosure sale of the Property.  This is a short
sale and the payoff to Bayview otherwise in the absence of consent
to a short sale would be in excess of $1.2 million.

      d. An objection will need be filed within the date set forth,
which will not be less than 21 days for the date of the notice.
Hearing matters if an objection is filed.

The sale will be free and clear of such rights, with the lien to
attach to the proceeds of the sale.

The Debtor respectfully asks that the Court enters an Order: (i)
granting the Motion; and (ii) approving the Contract and
authorizing the sale of the Property free and clear of liens,
claims, encumbrances, interests with all net proceeds payable to
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC for payoff of the lien by short sale as
agreed at closing.

A hearing on the Motion is set for April 3, 2019 at 11:00 a.m.
Objections, if any, must be filed within 21 days from the service
of Notice.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

                http://bankrupt.com/misc/Jin_Kim_130_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser:

        Joanne Paddy
        631 West Bay Front Road
        Lothian, MD 20711

Jin H. Kim, owner of four commercial condominiums in Duluth,
Georgia, filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of
the Bankruptcy Code on Nov. 14, 2017.  On Feb. 9, 2018, the case
was converted to to Chapter 11 (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 17-25277).
The Burns Law Firm, LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


JLAN PROPERTIES: April 25 Plan Confirmation Objection Deadline
--------------------------------------------------------------
The amended disclosure statement filed by JLAN Properties, LLC, is
approved.

May 14, 2019, at 9:30 am in the United States Bankruptcy Court,
Courtroom No. 2, Max Rosenn U.S. Courthouse, 197 South Main Street,
Wilkes-Barre, PA 18701, is fixed for the hearing on confirmation of
the plan.

April 25, 2019, is fixed as the last day for submitting written
acceptances or rejections of the plan to JLAN Properties, LLC.

April 25, 2019, is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to confirmation of the plan.

May 7, 2019, is fixed as the last day for filing with the Court a
tabulation of ballots accepting or rejecting the plan.

               About JLAN Properties

JLAN Properties, LLC, is a privately-held operator of
nonresidential buildings.

JLAN Properties sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 18-04205) on October 4,
2018.  In the petition signed by Linda Teberio, managing member,
the Debtor estimated assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities
of less than $1 million.  Judge John J. Thomas presides over the
case.


JOSEPH MUSUMECI: Selling 50% Interest in Hallandale Condo Unit
--------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph A. Musumeci asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of New Jersey to authorize the sale of his 50% tenant-in-common
interest in a residential condominium identified as Unit No. 402 at
2420 Diana Drive, Hallandale, Florida to the other 50% owner, Ralph
Aversa, for $40,000, cash, subject to higher and better offers.

The Debtor is the owner of a 50% interest in the Property.  The
Property is a 50% interest in the condominium excluding all
furnishings and personalty at the Property.  The furnishings and
personalty are owned by the Buyer.  The sale of the Property is "as
is, where is" with no representations or warranties of any kind.
The sale is subject to existing real estate taxes, condominium fees
and assessments and municipal charges. Those expenses are the
Buyer's obligation.

The Property is unencumbered by a mortgage.  The Debtor has
received an offer to purchase the Property for $40,000 over and
above any and all outstanding real estate taxes, monthly
maintenance fees and assessments and municipal charges and subject
to the interest of the other 50% owner, the Buyer.  The offer
received for the Debtor's 50% interest was received from the Buyer.
The condition of the sale to the Buyer is the entry of an Order by
the Bankruptcy Court approving the sale of the Property free and
clear of liens, claims or interests except for the exceptions set
forth pursuant to Section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The payment of outstanding real estate taxes, monthly maintenance
fees and assessments and other municipal charges will be the
responsibility of the Buyer at closing.  The $40,000 to be paid to
the Debtor is net all other costs.  No real estate broker is
involved in this transaction.  The sale is subject to higher and
better offers.

The Debtor has received a market analysis of the fair market value
of the Property as a whole from a broker associate in Florida
called Marc Diaz Realty Group.  The market value the Property
including 100% of the title is based upon the use of comparable
sales which reflects a per square ft. value of $159.  The
condominium has a square footage of 886 sq. ft. Based upon the
computation the condominium as a whole is valued at $139,284.  The
analysis notes that there are 53 active listings of similar units
for sale and that only 3 have sold to date and during 2018.

By the Motion, the Debtor asks the entry of an order authorizing
the sale of his interest in the Property to the Buyer for $40,000
subject to higher and better offers, free and clear of liens,
claims and encumbrances except as noted and granting related
relief.

The salient terms of the Agreement are:

     a. The interest is to be sold to Ralph Aversa.  Mr. Aversa is
the owner of a 50% interest in the Property and is asking to
purchase the outstanding tenant-in-common interest from the Debtor.
The Debtor will deliver a Quitclaim Deed to the Property in form
so as to be recordable in the State of Florida at closing.  The
Buyer is responsible for any and all recording costs and transfer
charges.

     b. The payment of all outstanding and accrued real estate
taxes and other municipal charges, outstanding condominium
maintenance fees and assessments through the closing date will be
the obligation of the Buyer; otherwise Buyer will not assume and
will be deemed not to have assumed any Liabilities of the Debtor of
whatever nature, whether presently in existence or arising
hereafter, known or unknown, disputed or undisputed, contingent or
non—contingent, liquidated or unliquidated, or otherwise, other
than the Assumed Liabilities.

     c. The aggregate consideration for the Property will be the
greater of the sum of $40,000 or so much as is bid over and above
the sum of $40,000.  The $40,000 or so much as is bid over the sum
of $40,000 by the successful bidder will be net to the Debtor.  All
costs are the obligation of the Buyer.  There will be no
adjustments and no pro-rations at closing.

     d. The closing of the purchase and sale will take place at the
offices of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, 99 Wood Avenue
South, Iselin, New Jersey 08830 (or at such other place as the
Parties may designate in writing) at 10:00 am. (PET) on that date
which is no more than 16 days after the date of entry of an Order
Approving the Sale.

     e. The sale is for cash only without contingencies for
financing, due diligence or any other matter except the entry of an
Order of the Court in the Joseph Musumeci Bankruptcy Case approving
the sale.

     f. At the conclusion of bidding, the Debtor will select the
successful bidder and recommend the successful bidder to the Court
for approval.

The Debtor asks that the Sale be approved free and clear of all
liens, claims and encumbrances.

The Debtor asks to have a hearing to consider approval of the Sale,
subject to higher and better offers, at the Court's earliest
convenience.  Interested parties must attend the Sale Hearing and
be prepared to bid.  Notice of the Sale will be given to all
creditors in the Debtor's Case and to parties who have requested
notice.

All persons interested in bidding for the Property and the Debtor's
Interest in the Property must submit to the Debtor proof of
financial ability to bid for the Property at least five business
days prior to the Sale Hearing. Bidders will be required at that
time to post a deposit of $5,000 in escrow with the Debtor's
counsel in order to bid at the Sale.

The Market Analysis suggests that the sale of the entire unit would
generate $139,284 which would on its face lead one to believe that
the Debtor's estate would receive $70,000 if the entire unit were
to be sold; however the Market Analysis makes the point that the
market is very soft and that of the 53 active units on the market
which are comparable only 3 of the units have been sold in the past
year.  Moreover, selling the unit as a whole would necessitate
listing the unit with a broker and a 6% commission of roughly
$8,400 reducing the net proceeds to roughly $131,000 and the
Debtor's estimated share to $65,500 when and if sold.  Finally the
outstanding real estate taxes are roughly $7,400 and a tax sale
certificate has been sold.  If the sale to Aversa is approved
Aversa will pay the outstanding real estate taxes in full.  The
$40,000 is net to the Debtor. Under the circumstances given the
lack of a market and the offer for the 50% interest at $40,000
sound business judgment dictates that the sale be approved.

The Debtor asks that the Bankruptcy Court waives the 14-day stay
period under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) or, in the alternative, if an
objection to the Sale is filed, reduces the stay period to the
minimum amount of time needed by the objecting party to file its
appeal.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Joseph_Musumeci_126_Sales.pdf

A hearing on the Motion is set for April 2, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.

The Debtor asks the Court to waive the 10-day stay under Bankruptcy
Rule 6004(h).

Joseph A. Musumeci sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Case
No. 16-34103) on Nov. 30, 2017.  The Debtor tapped David L. Bruck,
Esq., at Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, et al.

On Dec. 22, 2018, the Court confirmed the Debtor's Plan of
Reorganization, as amended.


KAREN WATSON: Cusion Buying 2002 ML 320 Mercedes Benz for $1K
-------------------------------------------------------------
Karen Kaye Watson asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas to authorize the sale of a 2002 ML 320 Mercedes
Benz, to Mabel Cushion for $1,000, nunc pro tunc to Feb. 23, 2019.

The Debtor had made arrangements to sell the Motor Vehicle to Ms.
Cushion prior to the filing of the Case and consummated the sale
post-petition on Feb. 23, 2019.

The Motor Vehicle was over 16 years old at the time of sale and had
237,000 miles on the odometer.  The value of the Motor Vehicle was
negligible.  Ms. Cushion purchased the Motor Vehicle for $1,000.  

The sale proceeds are currently being held in the Debtor's DIP bank
account.  There were no liens or other encumbrances against the
Motor Vehicle at the time of the sale.

The price realized for the Motor Vehicle is within the range of
reasonableness for a vehicle of the type, make, model, year and
mileage.

The Debtor recognizes that the sale of the Motor Vehicle may have
occurred outside the ordinary course of business of the Debtor and
should have been pre-approved by the Court.  She misunderstood
whether a sale contemplated before the bankruptcy of this type
needed to be approved after the bankruptcy was filed.  She did not
intend to violate any provision of the Bankruptcy Code or show
disrespect to the Court.  The Debtor believes and has reason to
believe that no creditor other party in interest will be adversely
affected by the granting of the Motion.

A copy of the Bill of Sale attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Karen_Watson_23_Sales.pdf

Counsel for Debtor:

       Bruce W. Akerly, Esq.
       AKERLY LAW PLLC
       878 S. Denton Tap Road, Suite 100
       Coppell, TX 75019
       Telephone: (469) 444-1864
       E-mail: bakerly@akerlylaw.com

Karen Kaye Watson sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex.
Case No. 19-30451) on Feb. 4, 2019.  The Debtor tapped Bruce W.
Akerly, Esq., at Akerly Law PLLC as counsel.



KENNETH HOOD: Neblett Buying The Johnson Place for $365K
--------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth Brown Hood asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Mississippi to authorize the sale of the real property
located and described as Tract l, The Johnson Place, Unit #8 of the
J.S. Gortner Farm in the Second Judicial District of Bolivar
County, Mississippi, to Rives Neblett for $365,000, cash.

The Debtor has made the decision to liquidate certain real property
owned by, and titled to, him located in Bolivar County,
Mississippi, both in connection with the case and in the "related"
cases of Curtis G. Hood, Howard Allen Hood, William Cary Hood.

The decision to liquidate The Johnson Place property is in the best
interest of all creditors and all parties in interest.  The
Purchaser for The Johnson Place property has executed a letter of
intent dated March 4, 2019.  The purchase price for The Johnson
Place is $365,000, a fair market value of The Johnson Place.

The ad valorem taxes owed on The Johnson Place will be prorated at
closing on the real property based on possession as between the
Purchaser and the Debtor.  The Debtor asks authority of the Court
to execute such deed, transfer of title or other related documents
which are reasonably necessary to consummate and close the sale of
the Real Property.

The Debtor proposes to sell The Johnson Place free and clear of
liens, claims and security interests with the exception of ad
valorem tax claims which will be prorated and paid at closing.  He
asks that the Court approves the sale for the fair, reasonable, and
appropriate letter of intent price of $365,000.

Upon the closing of the sale transaction, the net funds (sales
price less ad valorem taxes for 2019), will be placed in an
interest bearing escrow account by the counsel for the Debtor, with
the funds to be disbursed for administrative claims, and thereafter
only upon further order, after notice and a hearing.   Other
grounds to be assigned upon a hearing thereof.

A copy of the Letter of Intent attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Kenneth_Hood_271_Sales.pdf

Kenneth Brown Hood sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Miss.
Case No. 16-14511) on Dec. 30, 2016.  The Debtor tapped Craig M.
Geno, Esq., at Law Offices of Craig M. Geno, PLLC as counsel.


KODRENYC LLC: MNAR Buying Miami Property for $9.7 Million
---------------------------------------------------------
Kodrenyc, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for Middle District
of Florida to authorize the sale of the real property located at
17800 State Road 9, Miami, Florida to MNAR 17800 IPCO RD, LLC for
$9.7 million.

The Debtor holds fee simple title to a parcel of Property, which is
encumbered by a first mortgage lien in favor of 17800 State Road 9
Lender, LLC in the amount of$797,813 and a junior mortgage lien
also in favor of Lender in the principal amount of $5,576,667.

The Property and the mortgage liens encumbering the Property are
the subject of that certain foreclosure suit pending in Miami-Dade
County Florida (Case No. 2017-019819 CA 01) ("State Court Action"),
which was commenced by Lender on Aug. 14, 2017.  As of the Petition
Date, litigation in the State Court Action remained ongoing, a
receiver had been appointed, but no judgment of foreclosure had
been entered in the case.

Prior to the State Court Action, the Debtor was the landlord in
respect of a lease to an affiliated company named "Ak "N" Eli, LLC
which operated a gentleman's club known as King of Diamonds.  The
Lender's predecessor in interest, AM145 Holdings, LLC was a member
of the Debtor and, through various entities and individuals,
controlled the operations and cash of Akneli.  Under the operating
agreements of the Debtor and Akneli, all cash, after club
operations, was to be used to pay down the $4 million loan
(originated in 2014) to AM.

Upon information and belief, Akneli caused over $2.5 million to be
diverted from Akneli with such funds not credited as lease payments
and not applied to the 2014 Loan.  In March 2017, AM agreed, on
behalf of itself and Debtor, to modify the 2014 Loan despite the
loan having matured, and thus in default, since July 2015.  The
2017 Modification purported to add $1,576,667 to the balance ofthe
loan despite the fact that sufficient funds had been collected by
Akneli to pay all interest.

Moreover, the operating agreements of the Debtor and Akneli
required the funds, after operation, to be used for the 2014 Loan.
The Debtor has, on multiple occasions, asked for an accounting of
all monies collected and controlled by Akneli and, to date, has not
received such.  Ultimately, the loan was assigned to Lender which
instituted a foreclosure action in August of 2017.  Mr. Kenneth
Welt was appointed as receiver and evicted Akneli as tenant in
November 2018.  Currently, the building owned by the Debtor is
vacant.  On Dec. 17, 2018, the Debtor filed a counter claim against
the Lender seeking declaratory judgment in respect of the 2017
Modification and an accounting.

Prior to the Petition Date and during the pendency ofthe State
Court Action, the Debtor received a purchase offer from the
Purchaser for the Property.  The offer is memorialized in a real
estate purchase agreement dated Nov. 21, 2018 which contemplates
that the sale of the Property to the Purchaser for a total purchase
price of $9.7 million, and that closing would take place after the
expiration of time permitted for due diligence, inspections and
satisfaction of those certain closing contingencies set forth in
the Purchase Agreement.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the closing was scheduled for
Feb. 11, 2019; however, it was delayed due to a dispute concerning
certain figures set forth in the payoffquote provided by the
Lender, which dispute the Debtor was unable to resolve by the
proposed closing date.  As such, the closing was placed on hold and
the Purchaser's deposit of $1 million remains in escrow.

On Feb. 2, 2018, at the request of the Debtor, the Lender sent a
payoffletter which as of such date, indicated the balance was
$6,508,000.  After obtaining the 2018 Payoff Letter, the Debtor
sought to procure a buyer and, after executing the Purchase
Agreement, requested another payoff.  On Feb. 1, 2019, the Lender
sent a second payoff letter which listed the payoff as $8,923,517.
The 2019 Payoff Letter reflects an increase of $2,415,516, or
roughly 37%, in one year.  The Debtor disputes the amount in the
2019 Payoff Letter based, inter alia, on the failure to properly
account for funds collected by Akneli and because the debt owed to
Lender is subject to both recharacterization and equitable
subordination.  The Debtor expects to file its adversary proceeding
against Lender in the next two weeks.  Even if the 2019 Payoff
Letter is ultimately found to be correct, the Agreement will
produce proceeds sufficient to pay the amount in full.

The property is also encumbered by disputed claims reflected on
Exhibit D.  As to the code Violations, the Debtor asserts such are
not obligations of the Debtor.  As to the claims oflien, Debtor
asserts that such debts have been paid in full or are not the
responsibility of the Debtor.  The Motion asks to sell free and
clear of the Disputed Claims with liens attached to the proceeds

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/Kodrenyc_LLC_23_Sales.pdf

A hearing on the Motion is set for March 13, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.

                        About Kodrenyc

Kodrenyc, LLC is a single asset real estate debtor, whose principal
assets are located at 17800 State Road 9 Miami, FL  33612.

Kodrenyc, LLC sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case
No. 19-00996) on Feb. 18, 2019.  The petition was signed by Jeffrey
Vasilas, manager of 17800 Gardens D, LLC, the manager/member of
AQFC LLC, manager/member of Kobrenyc, LLC.  The Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities in the range of  $1 million to $10 million.

The Debtor tapped Scott R. Shuker, Esq., at Latham, Shuker, Eden &
Beaudine, LLP, as counsel.


KRATON CORP: Moody's Alters Outlook to Pos. & Affirms B1 CFR
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has changed Kraton Corporation's outlook
to positive from stable. At the same time, Moody's has affirmed
Kraton's B1 Corporate Family Rating ("CFR"), Ba3 rating on its
senior secured term loans, B3 rating on its senior unsecured notes,
Probability of Default Rating of B1-PD, and Speculative Grade
Liquidity Rating of SGL-2.

Affirmations:

Issuer: Kraton Corporation

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B1

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B1-PD

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Affirmed SGL-2

Issuer: Kraton Polymers Holdings B.V.

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Ba3 (LGD3)

Issuer: Kraton Polymers LLC

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Ba3 (LGD3)

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed B3 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Kraton Corporation

  Outlook, Changed To Positive From Stable

Issuer: Kraton Polymers LLC

  Outlook, Changed To Positive From Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

"Kraton's positive outlook reflects its strong position in the B1
rating, as the company has improved its earnings and reduced debt
since its acquisition of Arizona Chemical in 2016. The chance of a
rating upgrade will increase, if the company continues to reduce
debt, improve operational reliability and business resilience
against demand and feedstock volatility," says Jiming Zou, a
Moody's Vice President and Lead Analyst for Kraton.

Kraton's adjusted debt/EBITDA declined to 4.1x at the end of 2018,
from 5.7x at the end of 2016, thanks to improved earnings and debt
reduction. Its shifting product mix to specialty chemicals, reduced
interest expenses after repaying its high-cost senior notes and
moderate capital spending contributed to free cash flows and
deleveraging over the last two years. Kraton is likely to generate
enough cash from operations to cover capital spending and repay
additional debt in 2019. However, uncertainty with regard to the
global economy, particularly slowing Chinese demand, operational
reliability issues, higher freight and logistics costs, as well as
working capital swings remain the key challenges to its business
operations and cash flow generation in 2019. These concerns and
their potential impact on Kraton's financial performance create
uncertainty over its ability to maintain adjusted leverage below
4.5x in 2019. Additionally, Kraton's strategic evaluation of its
fast growing, high-margin Cariflex business, including a possible
sale, and its recently announced share repurchase indicate that
management needs to balance the competing demands for shareholder
returns, capital reinvestment and deleveraging over the next two
years.

The affirmation of Kraton's B1 rating is supported by its leading
market positions in high-margin hydrogenated styrenic block
copolymers (HSBC) and Cariflex products, as well as pine based
specialty chemicals with advantaged feedstock position. The company
benefits from its long lived customer and supplier relationships,
diverse end-markets and customers, both hydrocarbon and renewable
raw materials.

Kraton's exposure to performance volatility and working capital
swings due to large movements in raw material prices, such as
butadiene and styrene, some risk of product substitution in pine
chemicals and unexpected production outages lead to some volatility
in financial performance. However, Moody's expects raw material
prices will remain relatively low and stable in 2019.

Kraton has good liquidity thanks to its cash balance, expected free
cash flow generation and $250 million five-year asset based
revolving credit facility. Kraton reported $86 million cash on hand
as of December 31, 2018. We expect cash flow from operations to
exceed $250 million which will well cover its expected capital
expenditure in the coming 12 months, providing liquidity for debt
redemption and share repurchases. However, rising raw material
costs could increase working capital needs and reduce its operating
cash flow.

The rating could be upgraded if Kraton maintains leverage below
4.5x in 2019, continues to reduce debt and limits any adverse
impact to credit metrics from the event risk surrounding its
Cariflex business. The rating could be downgraded, if EBITDA
margins deteriorate, leverage exceeds 6.0x, or there is a lack of
free cash flow generation.

Kraton Corporation, headquartered in Houston, Texas, is a major
global producer of styrenic block copolymers (SBCs), which are
synthetic elastomers used in industrial and consumer applications
to impart favorable product characteristics such as flexibility,
resilience, strength, durability and processability. Major end uses
for Kraton's products include personal care products, packaging and
films, medical applications, adhesives, sealants, coatings, paving,
roofing and compounds. In January 2016, Kraton acquired Arizona
Chemical Holdings Corporation, a producer and seller of pine based
specialty chemicals for use in end-markets including adhesives,
fuel additives and roads. The company generated revenues of about
$2 billion in the twelve months ending December 2018.


LA PALOMA: Dispute with Creditors Not Amenable to Mediation
-----------------------------------------------------------
Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge recommends that the appeals
cases captioned Ad Hoc Group of Second Lien Creditors, Appellant,
v. La Paloma Generating Company, LLC, et al., Appellees, Ad Hoc
Group of Second Lien Creditors, Appellant, v. LNV Corporation,
Appellee, Case No. 16-12700 (CSS) Jointly Administered (D. Del.) be
withdrawn from the mandatory referral for mediation and proceed
through the appellate process of the Court.

As a result of a screening process, the issues involved in these
cases are not amenable to mediation and mediation at this stage
would not be a productive exercise, a worthwhile use of judicial
resources nor warrant the expense of the process.

Previously the parties requested mediation procedures for the Plan
Confirmation Appeal be suspended pending resolution of a related
dispute. This request was granted. On Dec. 27, 2018, Judge Sontchi
rendered a decision of this dispute, referred to as the
Intercreditor Decision. This was appealed on Jan. 4, 2019. By Oral
Order, counsel was directed to submit a joint letter regarding
mediation in relation to the Plan Confirmation Appeal and the
Intercreditor Appeal. The parties have since begun preliminary
discussions concerning possible resolution of the appeals. However,
in light of the issues on both appeals, none of the parties feel
that mediation of the appeals would be productive.

The parties involved in both appeals are financially sophisticated
and often involved in the distressed debt space. Each understands
the other's positions with respect to the various issues on these
appeals. Based on review of the parties' joint submission, the
Court understands that should any resolution occur it will likely
be achieved directly among the parties.

A copy of the Court's Recommendation dated Feb. 5, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2HMmpPH from Leagle.com.

Ad Hoc Group of Second Lien Creditors, Appellant, represented by
Jody Barillare , Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP.

La Paloma Generating Company LLC, Appellee, represented by Jason
Michael Madron -- madron@rlf.com -- Richards, Layton & Finger, PA &
Mark David Collins -- collins@rlf.com -- Richards, Layton & Finger,
PA.

LNV Corporation, Appellee, represented by Jeffrey M. Schlerf --
jschlerf@foxrothschild.com -- Fox Rothschild LLP.

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Appellee, represented by
Jason Anthony Gibson , The Rosner Law Group LLC.

                 About La Paloma Generating

La Paloma Generating Company, LLC, a D.C.-based merchant power
generator, and its affiliates La Paloma Acquisition Co, LLC, and
CEP La Paloma Operating Company, LLC, filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 16-12700 to 16-12702) on Dec.
6, 2016.  The petitions were signed by Niranjan Ravindran, as the
Debtors' authorized person.

La Paloma Generating estimated $100 million to $500 million in
assets and $500 million to $1 billion in liabilities.

The Hon. Christopher S. Sontchi presides over the cases.

The Debtors are represented by John J. Rapisardi, Esq., and George
A. Davis, Esq., at O'Melveny & Myers LLP, as lead bankruptcy
counsel; and Mark D. Collins, Esq., Andrew Dean, Esq., and Jason M.
Madron, Esq., at Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., as Delaware
counsel.  Lawyers at Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP serve
as conflicts counsel.  Jefferies LLC serves as the Debtors'
financial advisor and investment banker, while their claims and
noticing agent is Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions. Alvarez & Marsal North
America, LLC, is the financial advisor.

Maria Aprile Sawczuk has been appointed fee examiner in the
bankruptcy case.

On Aug. 2, 2017, the Debtors filed a Chapter 11 Plan and Disclosure
Statement.

Andrew R. Vara, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, on Sept. 5
appointed three creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of La Paloma Generating
Co. LLC, et al. The committee members are: (1) Argo Chemical, Inc.;
(2) PowerFlow Fluid Systems, LLC; and (3) GE Mobile Water, Inc.


LAKE BRANCH: Plan Confirmation Hearing Scheduled for April 30
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Caryl E. Delano conditionally approved Lake Branch
Dairy, Inc.'s disclosure statement referring to a chapter 11 plan.

Any written objections to the Disclosure Statement must be filed
and served no later than seven days prior to the confirmation
hearing.

Written ballot accepting or rejecting the plan must be submitted no
later than eight days before the confirmation hearing.

The Court will conduct a hearing on confirmation of the Plan on
April 30, 2019 at 1:30 PM in Tampa, FL − Courtroom 9A, Sam M.
Gibbons United States Courthouse, 801 N. Florida Avenue.

As previously reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, each
Holder of an Allowed Unsecured Claim will receive, on account of
such Allowed Claim, a Pro Rata Distribution of Cash from the Plan
Trust. To the extent the Holder of an Allowed General Unsecured
Claim receives less than full payment on account of such Claim, the
Holder of such Claim may be entitled to assert a bad debt deduction
or worthless security deduction with respect to such Allowed
Unsecured Claim.

A full-text copy of the Joint Disclosure Statement dated 25, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y5k9ju5pfrom PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                About Lake Branch Dairy, Inc.

Lake Branch Dairy, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D.
Fla. Case No. 18-05951), on July 19, 2018.  The Petition was signed
by Roger L. Nickerson, president. The Debtor is represented by
Buddy D. Ford, Esq. of Buddy D. Ford, P.A.  At the time of filing,
the Debtor had $3,331,161 in total assets and $7,906,868 in total
liabilities.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of Lake Branch Dairy, Inc., as of Aug. 16.


LAT REALTY: April 25 Plan Confirmation Objection Deadline
---------------------------------------------------------
The amended disclosure statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan
filed by LAT Realty, LLC, is approved.

May 14, 2019, at 9:30 am in the United States Bankruptcy Court,
Courtroom No. 2, Max Rosenn U.S. Courthouse, 197 South Main Street,
Wilkes-Barre, PA 18701, is fixed for the hearing confirmation of
the plan.

April 25, 2019, is fixed as the last day for submitting written
acceptances or rejections of the plan.

April 25, 2019, is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to confirmation of the plan.

May 7, 2019, is fixed as the last day for filing with the Court a
tabulation of ballots accepting or rejecting the plan.

               About JLAN Properties

JLAN Properties, LLC, is a privately-held operator of
nonresidential buildings.

JLAN Properties sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 18-04205) on October 4,
2018.  In the petition signed by Linda Teberio, managing member,
the Debtor estimated assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities
of less than $1 million.  Judge John J. Thomas presides over the
case.


LLCD LLC: Case Summary & 7 Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------
Two affiliates that have filed voluntary petitions seeking relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                      Case No.
     ------                                      --------
     LLCD, LLC                                   19-30489
     97 Olive Street
     New Haven, CT 06511

     LA4EVER, LLC                                19-30490
     97 Olive Street
     New Haven, CT 06511

Business Description: LLCD and LA4EVER are privately held
                      companies that are engaged in activities
                      related to real estate.  LLCD's principal
                      assets are located at 23 Brown Steet New
                      Haven, CT 06511.  LA4EVER's principal
                      assets are located at 325-327 Saint John
                      Street New Haven, CT 06511.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 29, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Connecticut (New Haven)

Judge: Hon. Ann M. Nevins

Debtors' Counsel: Neil Crane, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES OF NEIL CRANE, LLC
                  2679 Whitney Avenue
                  Hamden, CT 06518
                  Tel: (203) 230-2233
                  Fax: 203-230-8484
                  Email: neilcranecourt@neilcranelaw.com

LLCD, LLC's
Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

LLCD, LLC's
Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

LA4EVER, LLC's
Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

LA4EVER, LLC's
Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petitions were signed by Kenneth Hill, member/manager.

A full-text copy of LLCD, LLC's petition containing, among other
items, a list of the Debtor's seven unsecured creditors is
available for free at:
  
      http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb19-30489.pdf

A full-text copy of LA4EVER, LLC's petition containing, among other
items, a list of the Debtor's seven unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb19-30490.pdf

The Debtors previously sought bankruptcy protection on April 8,
2015:

          Debtor                    Case No.
          ------                    --------
          LA4Ever, LLC              15-30546
          LLCD, LLC                 15-30547


MAJOR EVENTS: Parkers Buying Philadelphia Property for $100K
------------------------------------------------------------
Major Events Group, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Pennsylvania to authorize the sale of the real property
at 113 n. 62d Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to Carolyn and
Gregory Parker for $100,000.

The Debtor has filed an Amended Disclosure Statement and Amended
Plan of Reorganization.  The Disclosure Statement and Plan have not
been confirmed or accepted; the Court has scheduled a hearing on
the matter for March 13, 2019 and, voting procedures could be
scheduled following the hearing.  The sale disclosed the Motion is
a part of the Amended Plan.

The Debtor owns the property, an investment property.

On March 8, 2019, the Debtor entered into an agreement to sell the
property to the Buyers for $100,000.  The sale was arranged by the
President of major Events Group LLC, Antoine Gardiner, and no real
estate commissions are to be paid out of the sale proceeds.

The Debtor believes that the agreed sales price represents the
approximate fair market value of the property.  The transaction is
an arms'-length transaction and the buyer is an unrelated third
party.

The proceeds of the sale ($50,394 in total) are proposed to be
distributed in the following fashion:

     a) Ordinary and reasonable settlement costs: $250

     b) Liens to be paid: (i) City of Philadelphia RE Tax Liens -
$29,286; (ii) Water Revenue Bureau - $17,908

     c) Real Estate Commission (5%) - $2,050

     d) Transfer Taxes - $1,590

     e) Tax credits, miscellaneous fees, est. - $900

The distribution set forth includes a payments on liens which have
been included in Proof of Claim 2, City of Philadelphia and Proof
of Claim 3, Water Revenue Department.  The payments reduce the
amounts due on the same proofs of claims, which are to be paid off
with the proceeds of the sale.

Proof of Claim 2, City of Philadelphia is in the amount of $56,220
is a Class 3 distribution in the Proposed Amended Plan.  The Claim
has earned approximately $6,044 in interest to the date of the
proposed sale, April 30, 2019; the total due on the Class 3
distribution is ($56,220 + 6,044) $62,264.  This amount must be
reduced by the prepayment of the lien at the closing; $62,2634 -
$29,286 = $32,977.  The remainder, $32,977 will be paid in full
from the distribution of the proceeds of the sale.

Proof of Claim 3, Water Revenue Department is in the amount of
$26,485 is a Class 4 distribution in the Proposed Amended Plan.
The Claim has earned approximately $1,898 in interest to the date
of the proposed sale, April 30, 2019; the total due on the Class 3

distribution is ($26,485 + 1,898)  $28,383.  The amount must be
reduced by the payment of the lien at the closing; $28,383 -
$17,908 = $10,475.  The remainder, $10,475 will be paid in full
from the distribution of the proceeds of the sale.

Proof of Claim 1, Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, has a secured
claim in the amount of $4,728.  This claim earns interest at 6%
from the petition date, and equals $339; the total amount owed on
the claim is $5,067 ($4,728 + 339).  It is a Class 4 distribution
and will be paid in full with the remaining proceeds from the sale.
Classes 3 and 4 will be paid in full from the proceeds of the
sale.

The closing for the transaction will be conducted by Olde City
Abstract, 1608 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, a licensed, bonded
Title Company.  The Title insurance is issued by Olde City
Abstract, and a copy of the Title Insurance will be appended to the
Motion when it has been prepared.

Any excess funds remaining after the distributions set forth will
be held in the Debtor in Possession account to be used for the
payoff the claims set forth in the Amended Plan.

A closing is scheduled for April 30, 2019.

                  About Major Events Group

Major Events Group LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 18-11123) on Feb. 20,
2018. In the petition signed by Antoine Gardiner, president, the
Debtor disclosed that it had estimated assets of less than $50,000
and liabilities of less than $50,000.  Judge Eric L. Frank oversees
the case.  The Debtor tapped Michael P. Kutzer, Esq., as its legal
counsel.


MAJOR EVENTS: Singleton Buying Lansdowne Property for $159K
-----------------------------------------------------------
Major Events Group, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Pennsylvania to authorize the sale of the real property
at 327 Walnut Street, Lansdowne, Pennsylvania to Cory Singleton for
$158,800.

The Debtor has filed an Amended Disclosure Statement and Amended
Plan of Reorganization.  The Disclosure Statement and Plan have not
been confirmed or accepted; the Court has scheduled a hearing on
the matter for March 13, 2019 and, voting procedures could be
scheduled following the hearing.  The sale disclosed the Motion is
a part of the Amended Plan.

The Debtor owns the property, an investment property.

In 2018, the Debtor entered into a real estate listing agreement
with licensed real estate agent Doniell Williams, Realty Mark
Cityscape HV.  An Application to approve the hiring of Doniell
Williams is pending before the Court.

On Feb. 18, 2019, the Debtor entered into an agreement to sell the
property to the Buyer for $158,800.  It believes that the agreed
sales price represents the approximate fair market value of the
property.  The transaction is an arms'-length transaction and the
Buyer is an unrelated third party.

The proceeds of the sale ($70,290 in total) are proposed to be
distributed in the following fashion:

     a) Ordinary and reasonable settlement costs: $250

     b) Liens to be paid: (i) Hard Money PA, LLC - $55,000, (ii)
Delaware county Tax Bureau - $4,600

     c) Real Estate Commission (5%) - $7,940

     d) Transfer Taxes - $1,590

     e) Tax credits, miscellaneous fees, est. - $900

The distribution set forth in paragraph 7 above includes a payment
to Hard Money PA, LLC, which is the creditor having filed proof of
Claim 7 in the case.  The distribution of proceeds from the sale of
the property will payoff Proof of Claim 7 in its entirety.

The remaining proceeds from the sales ($158,800 - $70,290 =
$88,510) will be used to payoff Proof of Claim 6, Select Holdings,
LLC.  The Claim has a value of $75,327 at the filing date and the
Amended Proposed Plan pays 7% interest post-petition, which would
amount to $5,859 if the claim were paid by March 31, 2019.  This
amount, $75,327 + $5,859 = $81,178, will be paid from the proceeds
of the sale to payoff Proof of claim 6, including post-petition
interest.

The closing for the transaction will be conducted by Affinity Land
Services, LLC, 85 Main St., Yardley, PA, a licensed, bonded Title
Company.  The Title insurance is issued by Commonwealth Land Title
Insurance, as set for in the attached Title Insurance Commitment.


Any excess funds remaining after the distributions set forth will
be held in the DIP account to be used for the payoff the claims set
forth in the Amended Plan.

The Broker has not entered into any agreement to share such
compensation as it may be awarded except as permitted under 11
U.S.C. Section 504(b).

A closing is scheduled for March 22, 2019.  The Buyer has been
approved for an FHA Loan.   

                  About Major Events Group

Major Events Group LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 18-11123) on Feb. 20,
2018. In the petition signed by Antoine Gardiner, president, the
Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of
less than $50,000.  Judge Eric L. Frank oversees the case.  The
Debtor tapped Michael P. Kutzer, Esq., as its legal counsel.



MIAMI BEVERLY: April 5 Disclosure Statement, Plan Hearing
---------------------------------------------------------
A consolidated hearing on the final approval of the second amended
disclosure statement, confirmation of the Chapter 11 Plan, and
approval of fee applications in the Chapter 11 cases of Miami
Beverly, LLC, 1336 NW 60 LLC, Reverend LLC, 13300 Alexandria Dr
Holdings LLC and The Holdings At City, LLC, will be on April 5,
2019 at 9:30 a.m.

Class 3 - General Unsecured Creditors. Class 3 consists of all
allowed general unsecured claims and is unimpaired by this Plan.
Total Claims Amount: $2,911,205.80. The total claims amount shall
be the basis for the 110% Reserve, or a Reserve of $3,202,326.388
Linda Leali, as Court appointed Receiver is also seeking the State
Court to award her a fee enhancement in an unknown amount. Since
such claim is also lodged against Holdings at City II, LLC, a
non-Debtor, Ms. Leali's claim, to the extent actually granted, will
be, at the consent of the Debtors and Holdings II's equity owner,
Denise Vaknin, may also be satisfied by Non- Debtor entity, rather
than Debtors.  As such and given the unknown amount of the fee
enhancement claim, Debtors do not account for the disputed claim in
the calculation of all Claims under Class 3.

The Debtors have filed an objection to the claims by Miami
Development & Holdings, LLC. Linda Leali filed a proof of claim
against each of the Debtors asserting claims on account of a common
nucleus of facts. Notwithstanding the filing of a claim(s) against
each of the Debtors, the claims of Linda Leali will be treated as a
single claim for purposes of the Plan and the Reserve in the amount
of $500,000 for which the Debtors will be jointly and severally
liable in the amount, if any, such claim may ultimately be allowed.
Linda Leali, P.A. has consented to the withdrawal of its claim
against each of the Debtors. Debtors will object to the claims
filed by Linda Leali to determine the extent and validity of her
claims, if any, given the sums detailed in the proofs of claim
forms. Debtors will join equity holders with their objection to the
Claims asserted by Gaynisha Williams, Nathanael Mars, Lakeisha
Chatfield, Shannon Daniels, Lakeisha Chatfield on Behalf of T.C.,
Linda Leali, Linda Leali, P.A., and further reserve the right to
object to any other general unsecured claims asserted against the
Debtors. Any allowed general unsecured claims by holders of Class 3
Claims will be paid in full at such time as the entry of a final,
non-appealable order or judgment, determining the validity, amount
and extent of the disputed claims, to the extent that any such
claims are allowed.

The means necessary for the execution of this Plan include the
total Funds received from the proceeds from the sale of the Real
Properties.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement dated
March 21, 2019, is available at http://tinyurl.com/yxouhgddfrom
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                     About Miami Beverly

Miami Beverly, LLC and its affiliates 1336 NW 60 LLC, Reverend,
LLC, 13300 Alexandria Dr. Holdings, LLC and The Holdings at City,
LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Lead Case No. 18-14506) on April 17, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Denise Vaknin, manager, Miami Beverly
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than
$500,000.  Judge Laurel M. Isicoff presides over the cases.  The
Debtor tapped Leiderman Shelomith Alexander + Somodevilla, PLLC, as
its legal counsel.


MIDICI GROUP: Committee Objects to Disclosure Statement
-------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of MidiCi Group, LLC, objects to the adequacy of
the First Amended Disclosure Statement explaining the Debtor's Plan
of Reorganization.

The Committee is interested in working with the Debtor to figure
out how much this company is really worth and how to get that value
to the creditors. According to the Committee the Plan however
offers them nothing.

The Committee points out that the biggest problem still with the
liquidation analysis of course is that it ignores the franchise
agreements that it has at this time. The Committee further points
out that the franchise agreements provide that the franchisees pay
a royalty to the Debtor (Franchisor) of 6% of sales plus various
other costs and expenses.

According to the Committee, it must be noted that the business
valuation states that "management" advised the valuation experts
that the liquidation value of the assets is $530,845. Exhibit J
states that the liquidation value of the assets is $169,500
"Debtor's assumption," and $361,500 "Best Case for Creditors."  The
Committee complains that the Plan does not pay $530,845 to
creditors.

The Committee points out the Debtor intends to assume some 200
franchise agreements. The Committee further point out that there is
next to no discussion about the on-going costs of operations of the
business thereafter.

According to the Committee, Classes numbers 2 through 6 are treated
the same; the franchise agreements will be assumed and concessions
made, the major concession seems to be that no royalties will be
required until each franchise reaches $1.5 million in sales in a
six month period. The Committee complain, "Where did that number
come from?" There are apparently no franchises with sales that
high.

Attorneys for the Committee:

     M. Jonathan Hayes, Esq.
     Matthew D. Resnik, Esq.
     Roksana D. Moradi-Brovia, Esq.
     RESNIK HAYES MORADI LLP
     17609 Ventura Blvd., Suite 314
     Encino, CA 91316
     Telephone: (818) 285-0100
     Facsimile: (818) 855-7013
     Email: jhayes@RHMFirm.com
            matt@RHMFirm.com
            roksana@RHMFirm.com

                   About MidiCi Group

MidiCi Group, LLC, is a franchisor of the MidiCi Neapolitan Pizza.
MidiCi Restaurants offer build-your-own Neapolitan pizzas, salads,
appetizers, dessert items, beverages, and other products for retail
sale to the public.  MidiCi Group is a California limited liability
company formed on Aug. 29, 2014.  It has offered franchises since
January 2015.

MidiCi Group, LLC, based in Encino, California, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-12354) on Sept. 21, 2018.
In the petition signed by Yotam Regev, chief operations officer and
member, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets
and the same range of liabilities.  The Hon. Victoria S. Kaufman
oversees the case.  Greenberg & Bass, serves as bankruptcy counsel
to the Debtor.  Roseman Law, APC, is the general business counsel,
and Lathrop Gage, is special counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Feb. 1 appointed four creditors
to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Chapter 11 case of MidiCi Group, LLC.  Resnik Hayes Moradi LLP
serves as the Committee's bankruptcy counsel.


MIDWEST MUSIC: Masonic Temple Buying Ellisville Property for $1.6M
------------------------------------------------------------------
Midwest Music Electronic Services, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Missouri to authorize the sale of
the commercial real property located at 15977 Clayton Road,
Ellisville, Missouri, to The Masonic Temple Association of St.
Louis for $1,625,000 on the terms of the Commercial Sale Contract.

The proposed real estate agent for the Debtor, TB Realty &
Development, Inc. was engaged by the Debtor before the filing of
the bankruptcy proceeding and the Application to Employ TB as Real
Estate Agent for Debtor Nunc Pro Tunc was filed contemporaneously
with the Motion and is currently pending before the Court.

TB has extensively marketed the Property over the last one and a
half years, and has engaged in discussions and negotiations with
interested parties, one of which ultimately executed the Sales
Contract.  The consideration for the sale is fair and reasonable.

The terms of the sale are explicitly set forth in the Sales
Contract, and are as follows:

     a. The Debtor Will sell the estate's interest in the Property
to the Purchaser, on an "as is" basis, without warranty, guaranty
or representation of any kind except the limited environmental
warranty made to the best of the Seller's knowledge, for a purchase
price of $1,625,000.

     b. The Purchaser deposited the sum of $25,000 in escrow as an
earnest money deposit to be held until the closing of the sale of
the Property.

     c. The closing on the Property will occur no sooner than the
14th day after the entry of the order approving the Motion and the
sale, unless otherwise authorized by the Court or mutually agreed
to by the Debtor and the Purchaser.

     d. The Purchaser will be responsible for all closing costs,
except that Debtor will pay, after the Court's prior approval if
the Motion and Application are granted, any and all commissions due
to the estate's real estate agent/broker and any State or County
taxes attributable to the Property for all years prior to 2019, as
well as the bankruptcy estate's pro rata share of any current State
or County real estate taxes or related taxes on the Property for
2019.

     e. At closing, Debtor will convey all of the estate’s
interest in the property to
Purchasers by Special Warranty Deed.

     f. The sale of the Property will be on an "as is" basis,
without representation, warranty or guaranty of any kind, except
the limited statement about environmental condition of the
Property, with the Order stating that the sale will be free and
clear of liens, encumbrances and interests, with any valid liens,
encumbrances and interests attaching to the Property.

     g. The sale is subject to various contingencies, including the
Debtor's ability to convey marketable title to the Property to the
Purchaser.

     h. If approval of the Sales Contract is not obtained from the
bankruptcy Court, the contract will be null and void and the
Purchaser will be entitled to the return of its earnest money.

     i. The Purchaser is solely responsible for investigating the
chain of title to the Property.  The Debtor will not be responsible
to correct nor be liable for any damages associated with
unmarketable or insufficient title to the Property.

The Debtor seeks approval from this Court to pay the following
obligations at the
closing under the Sales Contract:

     a. Pay any and all closing costs for which the bankruptcy
estate is liable under the Sales Contract;

     b. Pay the 6% commission to the Debtor's proposed real estate
agent (which includes any participating brokerage fee arrangement
in accordance with the listing agreement);

     c. Pay past due real estate taxes for 2016, 2017 and 2018 and
pro-rated 2019 taxes in the approximate amount of $70,000;

     d. Pay Fortune Bank the balance due on its note secured by a
first priority deed of trust on the Property in the approximate
amount of 650,000;

     e. Pay the United States Small Business Administration on its
note secured by a second priority deed of trust on the Property in
the approximate amount of $500,000;

     f. Pay any outstanding fees of the Debtor's Counsel, David M.
Dare, which have been previously approved by the Court;

     g. Allow the Debtor the right to orally request that the Court
approve bid procedures at the hearing on the Motion necessary to
effectuate an efficient auction of the Property to the highest and
best bidder in the event that objections or higher offers are
submitted by other competing bidders and/or other bidders appear at
the hearing on the Motion.  Further, in the event that such other
bids are received, the Debtor is further asking approval of any
such alternative bids and contracts to purchase the Property
without further notice or hearing; and

     h. Pay the balance of the funds into Counsel for the Debtor's
Law Firm Trust account for further distribution per order of the
Court or a continued plan of reorganization.

The Property has been marketed and listed for sale for almost three
years.  The Debtor's current realtor has been aggressively
marketing the Property since July of 2017.  The property has been
shown many times and numerous offers have been made to purchase
the
Property.  The current offer of $1,625,000 is the best offer that
the Debtor has received in the last year and a half and is also the
highest outstanding offer that the Debtor has received.  While it
welcomes a higher offer from a qualified purchaser, the Debtor does
not anticipate one coming forward.

The Debtor believes that the offer set out in the Sales Contract is
fair and reasonable and that it is in the best interest of the
bankruptcy estate to sell the Property to the Purchaser, as the
sale will pay off all liens on the Property and leave money for a
substantial payout to unsecured creditors through a plan of
reorganization.  It is unlikely that another purchaser could be
found in
the near term on similarly favorable terms.  The Debtor has
concluded in the exercise of its sound business judgment that the
Sale is in the best interest of the Debtor and its Estate.

Finally, the Debtor asks that the Court waives the 14-day stay
imposed by Bankruptcy Rule 6004 (h).  If the Sales Contract is
approved and the Purchaser's due diligence complete, the Debtor
desires to close the sale of the Property as soon as practical to
preserve the sale's value for the bankruptcy estate and minimize
additional costs.

A copy of the Sales Contract attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Midwest_Music_20_Sales.pdf

A hearing on the Motion is set for April 8, 2019 at 11:00 a.m.  The
objection deadline is April 1, 2019.

            About Midwest Music Electronic Services

Midwest Music Electronic Services, Inc. --
http://www.midwestmusicstl.com/-- operates a musical store
offering speakers, organs, pianos, guitars, amplifiers, drums and
other accessories.  Midwest Music also provides band and strings
instrument rentals.  It is also the home to St. Ann Music
Publications Co., which carries a full line of sheet music and
music method books.

Midwest Music Electronic Services sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case No. 18-46106) on
Sept. 25, 2018.  In the petition signed by Jerry Roberts,
president, the Debtor disclosed $2,497,784 in assets and $1,833,305
in liabilities.  Judge Kathy A. Surratt-States oversees the case.
The Debtor tapped Herren, Dare & Streett as its legal counsel.



MIKE & HENRY: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
--------------------------------------------------
Mike & Henry, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois a disclosure statement in conjunction
with its plan of liquidation.

The Debtor's plan is premised upon liquidation of the Debtor's
interest in the Western Springs, Illinois Property, which the
Debtor believes has a fair market value of as much as $500,000 or
more. Sale of the Property will pay all claims against the Debtor
in full, including the administrative claim, Michael Buzzelli's
secured claim, the claim of the Internal Revenue Service, the Cook
County Treasurer, and the secured claim of Matt Leuck. The plan
provides for distributions to the holders of allowed claims from
funds realized from the Sale of the Property.

Community Bank of Western Springs is the holder of Allowed Class 4
unsecured claim in the approximate amount of $5,000. Class 4 is
impaired because Community Bank will not be receiving interest.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
http://tinyurl.com/y5ghy8cmfrom Pacermonitor.com at no charge.  

                 About Mike & Henry LLC

Mike & Henry, LLC owns a real property where H&H Auto, which
provides auto repair service, operates.  The property is located at
17 W. Ogden Avenue, Western Springs, Illinois.  

Mike & Henry sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 18-30035) on October 25, 2018.  At
the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had estimated
assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of less than
$500,000.  

The case has been assigned to Judge Carol A. Doyle.  The Debtor
tapped Crane, Simon, Clar & Dan as its legal counsel.


MUNN WORKS: APF Wants Proposed Plan Outline Junked
--------------------------------------------------
APF Management Company, LLC, objects to the approval of Munnworks,
LLC's disclosure statement for its proposed chapter 11 plan.

APF asserts that the Plan fails to adequately provide information
concerning the litigation commenced by Laurie Munn, the sole member
of the Debtor against On-Deck. Ms. Munn commenced this action
seeking declaratory judgment against On-Deck wherein she states
that she did not sign the guarantee for the On-Deck loan, was
unaware of any such guarantee and did not know of such loan until
months after the loan was made. In fact, the Disclosure Statement
fails to so much as even mention this seminal litigation and its
potential impact.

The Plan also fails to adequately identify the universe of
unsecured claims within Class 6 of the Proposed Plan. Rather it
merely states that Class 5 (APF claim of $1,475,505) and Class 6
($423,310) may possibly share in a proposed payment of $280,000.
The identity of claim holders and amounts is unclear as there
appears to be multiple claims filed by a single holder. Also, upon
information and belief, the claim of Kurzman Eisenberg represents
the entire cost of litigating claims against APF as well as
defending against such claims on behalf of non-Debtors (Max Munn
and Molly Munn) as well as The Debtor. This Court has previously
ruled that the Debtor should only pay 80% of legal fees incurred on
the appeal from the APF judgment and that Max Munn and Molly Munn
be responsible for the balance or 20% of the fees. Apparently no
such allocation has been considered in the Plan.

Moreover, APF should be in the Class of general unsecured creditors
-- not in a "Gerrymandered" Class 5 of its own.

In sum, the Debtor's Disclosure Statement fails to adequately
disclose information related to the legal proceedings pending
between Laurie Mumi and On-Deck and does not explain the disparate
treatment between the three Classes of unsecured creditors. The
Disclosure Statement fails to provide any liquidation analysis.
Accordingly, APF respectfully requests that the Court deny approval
of the Debtor's Disclosure Statement.

A copy of APF's Objection is available at
http://tinyurl.com/y6eg4howfrom Pacermonitor.com at no charge.  

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that the Holders
of Allowed General Unsecured Claims will share Pro Rata with the
Class 5 Disputed APF Management Unsecured Claim and will receive,
in Cash, (i) on the Effective Date, a Pro Rata distribution from
the $150,000 Plan Contribution from Laurie Munn, and thereafter,
(ii) four annual payments in the amount of $26,000, for a total of
plan payments in the amount of $280,000. Class 6 General Unsecured
Claims are impaired under the Plan, and thus are entitled to vote
on the Plan. The Debtor estimates that Class 6 General Unsecured
Claims total $432,310.70.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Feb. 26, 2019 is available
at https://tinyurl.com/yy5pulfg from Pacermonitor.com at no
charge.

Counsel for Creditor APF Management Company, LLC:

     Timothy P. Coon, Esq.
     10 Bank Street, Suite 700
     White Plains, New York 10606
     (914) 949-2909
     tpcoon@eckertseamans.com

                    About Munn Works LLC

Based in Mount Vernon, New York, Munn Works, LLC --
https://www.munnworks.com/ -- manufactures fine mirrors and framed
artwork specifically for the hospitality industry. In addition to
its domestic partners, Munn Works maintains overseas production
capability with on-site MunnWorks employees.

Munn Works filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
18-22972) on June 25, 2018.  In the petition signed by Max Munn,
manager, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1 million
to $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Robert D. Drain.
Jonathan S. Pasternak, Esq., at Delbello Donnellan Weingarten Wise
& Wiederkehr, LLP, serves as counsel to the Debtor; Kurzman
Eisenberg Corbin & Lever, LLP and Meyer Suozzi English & Klein,
P.C., is the special litigation counsel.


NS FITNESS: Case Summary & 8 Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------
Debtor: NS Fitness LLC
           dba Next Step Fitness
        1600 SW 17th Ave.
        Ocala, FL 34471

Business Description: NS Fitness LLC --
                      http://www.nextstepfitnessocala.com--
                      owns and operates a gym in Ocala,
                      California.  Next Step Fitness is open
                      24/7.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 29, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida (Jacksonville)

Case No.: 19-01173

Debtor's Counsel: Kenneth M. Hesser, Esq.
                  SCHATT, HESSER, MCGRAW
                  P.O. Box 4440
                  Ocala, FL 34478
                  Tel: 352-789-6520
                  Fax: 352-789-6570
                  Email: khesser@schatthesser.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Steven Preston, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's eight unsecured creditors is available for
free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb19-01173.pdf


OGDENSBURG CITY: Moody's Rates $1.2MM Series 2019 GO Bonds 'Ba1'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Ba1 rating to the City of
Ogdensburg, New York's $1.2 million Public Improvement (Serial)
Bonds, 2019. Concurrently, Moody's affirms the city's Ba1 issuer
rating and the Ba1 rating on the city's outstanding general
obligation limited tax (GOLT) debt. The outlook has been revised to
positive from negative.

Moody's considers the city's GO debt to be GOLT because of
limitations under New York State law on property tax levy
increases. The issuer rating is equivalent to the city's
hypothetical general obligation unlimited tax rating; there is no
debt associated with this security.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba1 issuer rating reflects the city's small tax base limited by
a significant concentration of tax-exempt property, below average
wealth and income levels, budget constraints stemming from the
constitutional tax limit and reliance on economically-sensitive
revenues, and above average overall leverage and fixed costs. The
rating also incorporates improved financial management that has
driven material growth in liquidity and reserves in recent years,
institutional presence supporting the local economy, and strong
alternative liquidity in the water and sewer funds.

The absence of distinction between the GOLT rating and the issuer
rating reflects the city council's ability to override the property
tax cap and the city's pledge of its faith and credit to pay debt
service.

RATING OUTLOOK

The positive outlook reflects Moody's expectation that conservative
budgeting and expense management will continue to stabilize and
improve the city's financial position.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE

  - A trend of operating surpluses, leading to growth in liquidity
and reserves

  - Reduction in or elimination of cash flow borrowing

  - Material reduction in fixed costs

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE

  - Return to structural imbalance, with draws on liquidity and
reserves

  - Growth in cash flow borrowing

  - Material growth in fixed costs

  - Multi-year decline in tax base valuation

LEGAL SECURITY

All of the city's bonds are secured by the city's general
obligation pledge as limited by New York State's legislated cap on
property taxes (Chapter 97 (Part A) of the Laws of the State of New
York, 2011).

USE OF PROCEEDS

Proceeds of the bonds along with $66,000 in available funds will
redeem $1.25 million in bond anticipation notes maturing April
2019.

PROFILE

The City of Ogdensburg is in St. Lawrence County (Baa1, stable)
along the Canadian border, about 60 miles south of Ottawa. The city
had 10,851 residents as of 2017.


ONE CALL: Moody's Lowers CFR to Caa2
------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded One Call Corporation's
Corporate Family Rating (CFR) to Caa2 from Caa1 and the Probability
of Default Rating (PDR) to Caa2-PD/LD from Caa1-PD. Moody's also
downgraded the ratings on the first lien debt to B3 from B2 and the
unsecured rating to Ca from Caa3. Moody's affirmed the Caa3 rating
on the second lien notes. The rating outlook remains stable.

The downgrade reflects a material deterioration in One Call's
liquidity and failure to reduce leverage as planned over the last
year. The company has experienced weaker than expected operating
performance due in part to further delays in implementing a new IT
platform, called Polaris.

Concurrently with the downgrades, Moody's appended One Call's PDR
with an "/LD", signifying a limited default. The company recently
exchanged a portion of its 7.5% secured first lien notes due 2024,
a portion of its 10.0% secured second lien notes due 2024 and a
portion of its first lien term loan due 2022 for new 7.5%/11.0%
first lien PIK Toggle notes due 2024 (not rated). The /LD
designation reflects Moody's view that this constitutes a
distressed exchange, which is a default under Moody's definition.
Moody's definition of default is intended to capture events whereby
issuers fail to meet debt service obligations outlined in their
original debt agreements. Moody's will remove the /LD designation
from the PDR shortly. These transactions do not constitute an event
of default under any of the company's debt agreements.

The recent exchange of about $340 million of debt into the new PIK
first lien notes will help reduce the amount of cash interest
expense by about $30 million per year. While this will benefit
liquidity going forward, Moody's views the recent deterioration in
the company's liquidity profile as the main driving factor for the
exchange. Further, the increasing debt balances due to the PIK
interest will make it increasingly challenging to reduce leverage
over time.

Moody's took the following rating actions on One Call Corporation:

Downgrades:

Issuer: One Call Corporation

  Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to Caa2 from Caa1

  Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to Caa2-PD/LD from
  Caa1-PD

  Senior Secured 1st lien Revolving Credit Facility due 2022,
  Downgraded to B3 (LGD2) from B2 (LGD2)

  Senior Secured 1st lien Term Loan B due 2020, Downgraded to B3
  (LGD2) from B2 (LGD2)

  Senior Secured 1st lien Term Loan B due 2022, Downgraded to B3
  (LGD2) from B2 (LGD2)

  Gtd Senior Secured 1st lien Notes due 2024, Downgraded to B3
  (LGD2) from B2 (LGD2)

  Senior Unsecured Global Notes due 2021, Downgraded to Ca (LGD6)
  from Caa3 (LGD6)

Affirmations:

Issuer: One Call Corporation

  Gtd Senior Secured 2nd lien Notes due 2024, Affirmed Caa3 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: One Call Corporation

  Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Caa2 CFR reflects very high financial leverage and weak
operating performance. Moody's believes that One Call's inability
to grow earnings and cash flow has led to a significant
deterioration in liquidity, making the current capital structure
increasingly unsustainable, even after the recent loans and notes
exchange.

The rating also reflects the company's considerable concentration
of revenues with its largest customers. However, the rating is
supported by One Call's leading market position in workers'
compensation cost containment services and good geographic
diversity.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that leverage will
remain very high and the operating environment will remain
challenging. The outlook also incorporates Moody's expectation that
the company is making some progress in stabilizing operating
performance as it gradually transitions its clients to the new
Polaris IT system, which should have a beneficial impact on its
cost structure.

The ratings could be downgraded if liquidity or free cash flow
weakens further, increasing the of loss for creditors in a default
event or if the likelihood of default increases.

The ratings could be upgraded if the company demonstrates sustained
earnings and cash flow growth, materially reduces leverage, and
improves liquidity.

One Call Corporation provides cost containment services related to
workers' compensation claims. The company acts as an intermediary
between healthcare providers, payors and patients. Customers
include insurance carriers, third-party administrators,
self-insured employers, and state funds in the workers compensation
industry. Revenues are approximately $1.6 billion. The company is
owned by affiliates of Apax Partners. One Call does not publicly
disclose its financial results.


PATTY DEWITT: Croesus Buying Morgantown Parcels for $1.7 Million
----------------------------------------------------------------
Patty DeWitt asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia to authorize the sale of multiple parcels
of real estate located along Van Voorhis Rd in Morgantown,
Monongalia County, West Virginia, together with all improvements,
equipment, furnishings, fixtures, inventory, etc., located thereon,
to Milo C. Ritton, for Croesus Morgantown Holdings, LLC for $1.7
million.

The Debtor has a Court-approved Plan in place permitting the sale
of the Property to be sold.  The parcels of real property are
located along Van Voorhis Rd in Morgantown, Monongalia County, West
Virginia, those being: 1441, 1425, 1429, 1430 & 1428 Van Voorhis
Road, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505 et al; being all of the
remaining properties of Patty DeWitt on Van Voorhis in Morgantown,
WV not yet sold, described generally as: Primary residence;
adjacent single family residence; adjacent vacant lot of ground;
Valley Mart facility; and 3.586 acres with unfinished
8-plex/duplex, et al.; all further described as 1.33 ac sur. & Fre
C West Run, 0.37 ac & Fre C West Run, 1.03 Ac Sur & Fre C West Run,
1439 Van Voorhis Rd (Flood Area), 0.77 Ac West Run, Union District,
Monongalia County WV, Back Reference WB 99/394, DB 1180/198, WB
474/170, DB 1078/700, DB 1419/226; plus 3.586 ac with
8-plex/duplex.

Robert and Bonita Hadox prior had an option to purchase a portion
of the remaining properties of Debtor expiring as of March 8, 2019,
and no closing occurred thereon within said time frame.  The Debtor
this date accepted the offer subject to receiving a "comfort order"
to be recorded at closing as herein described and moved.

The major secured creditor, United Bank, has no objection to the
Court granting the Motion and the sale contemplated.

The Debtor has the power to accept the offer in accordance with the
Plan, approved on a prior date, and the attached is the only offer
received other than the prior Hadox offer after extensive marketing
over almost two years.

The offer, attached, is for $1.7 million, with $700,000 financed by
the Debtor over a 60-month period as set forth therein, and the
offer is almost identical in amounts offered for the individual
properties to a prior offer received.  Calculations show the total
payout and financed amount should be sufficient to satisfy all
bankruptcy claims 100%.

The counsel for the Debtor has examined the financial information
of Buyer and finds it supports an ability to pay both the initial
price and the financed portion of the sale.  The Buyer has
requested and the Seller agrees that, although the Court and the US
Trustee may receive a redacted copy of financial information, that
an Order to seal the information therein is requested to be entered
by the Court prior to it being spread upon the record and further,
that any other party requesting the same will receive it only after
signing a non-disclosure agreement with the Buyer.

The Court is requested to enter its Order granting the relief, and
all creditors and parties in interest have notice that the Court
may grant the relief requested in the Sale Motion upon a date 21
days after the filing, on March 30, 2019 if no written objection be
received by the Court, as it may rule in its sole discretion.

Further, upon the filing of any objection, or should the Court not
prior order the relief requested, the Court has provisionally
scheduled a hearing on April 11, 2019 at 2:30 p.m. regarding
approval of the remaining relief requested in the Sale Motion.

The sale is a Sale Free and Clear of Liens and Encumbrances, with
the same to attach to the sale proceeds: The sale proceeds will be
disbursed as follows: first, to all usual and ordinary, reasonable
and necessary costs and expenses of Closing (including but not
limited to real estate taxes and tax liens); second, to the payment
to United (as directed by their respective counsel) upon the
indebtedness secured by the lien of said secured creditor upon the
Property; and third, the remainder of said sale proceeds, payable
to the Debtor's counsel in trust for the benefit of entitled
creditors and parties in interest, whether pursuant to the
confirmed Plan.   

Wherefore, the Debtor respectfully prays the Court may grant her
motion and the property be sold free and clear of liens and
encumbrances, with liens and encumbrances attaching to proceeds
upon the contract.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/Patty_DeWitt_354_Sales.pdf

                    About Patty JoAnne DeWitt

Patty JoAnne DeWitt sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. W.Va.
Case No. 17-00120) on Feb. 2, 2017.  The Debtor tapped J. Frederick
Wiley, PLLC, and Johnson Law, PLLC, as counsel.  Howard Hanna
Premier Properties by Barbara Alexander, LLC, by Kay Alexander and
Rob Young were approved by the Court as the Raltor for the Debtor.

The Debtor has a court-approved plan in place permitting the sale
of multiple parcels of real estate, together with all improvements,
equipment, furnishings, fixtures, inventory, etc, located thereon
to be sold.


PAUL SHEPHERD: Choi Buying Loas Angeles Properties for $6.6M
------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Stuart Shepherd and Gigi Renee Shepherd ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to
authorize the sales of (a) their real property located at 2375
Sunset Plaza Drive, Los Angeles, California, APN 5563-031-012
("Lower Lot"), an approximately 1-acre lot of undeveloped land, for
$1 million; and (b) their contiguous neighboring real property
located at 2460 Sunset Plaza Drive, Los Angeles, California, APN
5563-031-011 ("Upper Lot"), an approximately 1.5-acre lot on which
is located the Debtors' principal residence, for $5.6 million, to
Eric Choi.

On July 7, 2017, the Debtors filed their Schedules of Assets and
Liabilities.  As set forth in the Schedules, as of the Petition
Date, excluding Keros' disputed claim, the Debtors had (1) a single
secured claim in the approximate principal amount of $110,000 (as
of the Petition Date) and $130,00 (at present) for the Secured
Hargitay Loan made by Hargitay to the Debtors, which is secured by
the first priority Hargitay DOT on the Upper Lot and (2) $1,297,424
in general unsecured claims for a total of approximately $1,407,424
in claims.  

Keros' disputed claim was resolved pursuant to, and subject to the
terms and conditions of, the Further Amended Keros Settlement,
which, depending on the time of the payment, requires a settlement
payment by the Debtors to Thrasher in an amount between $1.895
million and $2.125 million.  

The Debtors live on their Property, which is comprised of two
contiguous parcels of real property: (1) the Upper Lot, and (2) the
Lower Lot.  The Property was inherited by the Debtors from Mrs.
Shepherd's aunt, who purchased the Property in 1954 and tended
after the Property until her passing in 2004, when title to the
Property was transferred to the Debtors.

As can be seen from the Title Report, the Property is encumbered by
(1) various tax liens for property taxes and special assessments
all of which are current and any accrued prorated amount of which
is allocated to the Debtors pursuant to the Purchase Agreement will

be paid out of escrow on closing, and various easements and
consents to use land, all of which appear as Items 1-27 of the
Title Report; (2) a Lis Pendens recorded by Keros in connection
with his State Court Action seeking specific performance of the
Keros Purchase Agreement, which Lis Pendens appears as Item 28 in
regard to the Upper Lot and Item 29 in regard to the Lower Lot; and
(3) the Hargitay DOT securing the Secured Hargitay Loan in the
principal amount of $109,745, which Hargitay DOT appears as Item 30
on the Title Report and is only against the Upper Lot.

The proceeds from the Secured Hargitay Loan, together with an
additional unsecured loan from Hargitay in the amount of $43,255,
were used by the Debtors to fund certain legal expenses arising
from disputes by and between, among others, the Debtors, Keros,
real estate
broker Douglas Elliman, and Douglas Elliman real estate agent Josh
Altman regarding that certain Residential Purchase Agreement and
Joint Escrow Instructions entered into between the Debtors and
Keros that contemplated a prior potential sale of the Property to
Keros that never consummated.

Pursuant to the Motion, the Debtors are not proposing to sell free
and clear of (1) Items 1-27 of the Title Report or (2) any alleged
rights under that certain Mobilization Agreement between the
Debtors and James Wecker II, which will remain as encumbrances
against the Property after the sale.

Pursuant to the Motion, the Debtors are proposing to sell free and
clear only of (1) Items 28 and 29 for Keros' lis pendens against
the Upper Lot and Lower Lot, respectively, (2) Item 30 for the
Hargitay DOT securing the Secured Hargitay Loan, which will be paid
in full from escrow, and (3) all other liens, claims, encumbrances,
and interests (other than the Excepted Items) pertaining to the
Property, including, but not limited to, licenses allowing the
limited use of the Property granted by the Debtors in favor of John
Powell, David Leon, Thomas Nickel, Rozae Nichols, and Alan Diamond,
which Licenses by their terms will automatically terminate upon the
close of the sale of the Property.  

On March 8, 2019, the Buyer made an offer for the Property.
Subsequently, the Debtors and the Buyer engaged in protracted
arms'-length negotiations, including the exchange of various
counteroffers, which resulted in the Purchase Agreements being
fully executed on March 13, 2019.

The salient terms of the APAs are:

     a. Name of Buyer: Eric Choi

     b. Asset: The Property, consisting of the Lower Lot and the
Upper Lot

     c. Purchase Price: $6.6 million ($1 million for the Lower Lot
and $5.6 million for the Upper Lot)

     d. Deposit: $198,000 (3% of the Purchase Price)

     e. Estimated Costs of Sale: Total of approximately 5.7%
comprised of (i) a 4.5% commission in the amount of $297,000 to be
paid to Compass pursuant to the Court-approved terms of Compass'
employment, as Compass is representing both the Debtors and the
Buyer, and after accounting for Compass' voluntary reduction of its
commission, and (b) approximately 1.2% in prorated real property
taxes secured by the Property allocated to the Debtors and other
customary fees and costs of sale.

     f.  Overbid: The proposed sale is not subject to overbid,
because (i) the Debtors, in consultation with their broker,
Compass, determined that marketing the Property as a sale seeking a
stalking horse bid subject to overbid would make a property that is
already difficulty to sell (given the amount of due diligence and
infrastructure required) unnecessarily difficult to sell, so the
Debtors, in consultation with Compass, decided to list the Property
for a straight sale only subject to the approval of the Court, (b)
based on the foregoing and negotiations with the Buyer, the
Purchase Agreement does not provide for the sale to be subject to
overbid, and (c) the Purchase Price will generate sufficient funds
to pay all allowed claims in full with a distribution to the
Debtors of surplus funds, such that the Debtors are the only
parties that would ultimately benefit from overbid.   

     g. Contingencies: The Purchase Agreement does not contain a
financing contingency.  The Purchase Agreement does contain
customary inspection  contingencies that will expire on March 27,
2019.  The Purchase Agreement is also  subject to the contingency
that the sales of both the Lower Lot and Upper Lot are approved by
the Court and that such sales close concurrently on or before April
15, 2019, provided that (a) if close of the sales is delayed beyond
April 15, 2019 solely through the fault of the Buyer, then the
purchase price will be increased by $100,000 and (2) if the close
of the sales does not occur on or before May 10, 2019, then the
Debtors may cancel the Purchase Agreements with a return of the
Buyer’s deposit.  As noted, the targeted closing date of on or
before April 15,  2019 is intended to allow the sales to close in
time for the Debtors to pay Thrasher the Further Reduced Keros
Settlement Amount (which is discounted by $100,000 from the Reduced
Keros Settlement Amount to be paid of the sale closes and payment
is made after April 19, but on or before May 10, 2019) by the April
19, 2019 deadline under the Further Amended Keros Settlement and
for the Buyer to reimburse the Debtors the additional $100,000 they
would have to pay to Thrasher if the closing occurs after April 15,
2019 solely through the fault of the Buyer.

     h.  Other Terms: The Debtors' sale of the Lower Lot will be
free and clear of any and all liens, claims, encumbrances, and
interests.

     i. Potential Tax Consequences: The Debtors will have to pay
applicable capital gains taxes stemming from the sale of the
Property after applicable deductions and exemptions.  

The Purchase Price for the Property will generate sufficient funds
to pay all allowed claims in full with a distribution to the
Debtors of surplus funds, as follows:

      Purchase Price                         $6,600,000
      Less 4.5% Commission to Compass        $  297,000
      Less Estimated Prorated Real Property  $   79,200
            Taxes secured by the Lower Lot
            Allocated to the Debtors and
            Other Customary Costs of Sale
      Less Secured Hargitay Loan Claim       $  130,000
      Less Administrative Claims of Counsel  $1,300,000
            (subject to potential agreed
            discounts)
      Less Further Reduced Keros             $1,895,000
            Settlement Amount  
      Less Other General Unsecured Claims    $1,297,978
      Less Capital Gains Taxes               $  500,000
      Balance to Debtors                     $1,100,822

The sale of the Property will provide substantial benefits to the
estate and its creditors, as well as the Debtors.  The Purchase
Price for the Property will generate sufficient funds to pay all
allowed claims in full with a distribution to the Debtors of
surplus funds.    In addition, (1) if the sale of the Property
closes and the Debtors are able to pay Thrasher the $1,895,000.
Further Discounted Keros Settlement Payment on April 19, 2019, then
the Debtors will obtain a discount of $230,000 over the $2,125,000
that will be owed to Thrasher if payment if made after May 10, 2019
and (2) if the sale of the Property closes and the Debtors are able
to pay Thrasher the $1,995,000 Discounted Keros Settlement Payment
between April 20, 2019 and May 10, 2019, then the Debtors will
obtain a discount of $130,000 over the $2,125,000 that will be owed
to Thrasher if payment if made after May 10, 2019, provided that if
the delay in closing is caused solely by the Buyer, the Debtors
will recoup an additional $100,000 from the Buyer.  Finally, the
sale of the Property will allow the Debtors to move expeditiously
to the close of their case.   Based on the foregoing, the Debtors
submit that the proposed sale of the Property is overwhelmingly in
the best interests of the estate and their creditors and,
therefore, represents a sound exercise of their business judgment.


A copy of the APAs attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Paul_Shepherd_241_Sales.pdf

The Debtors ask that the Court waives the stay under FRBP 6004(h)
and that the Sale Order be effective immediately upon entry.  

A hearing on the Motion is set for April 3, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.
Objections, if any, must be filed at least 14 days prior to the
hearing on the Motion.

Paul Stuart Shepherd and Gigi Renee Shepherd sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-17991) on June 30, 2017.
The Debtors tapped Todd M. Arnold, Esq., at Levene, Neale, Bender,
Yoo & Brill L.L.P as counsel.  The Debtors also tapped Hilton &
Hyland as real estate broker.



PENINSULA RESEARCH: Court Vacates Disclosure Statement Order
------------------------------------------------------------
The Bankruptcy Court vacated the order conditionally approving the
Disclosure Statement explaining Peninsula Research Ormond Beach,
LLC's Chapter 11 Plan, Scheduling Confirmation Hearing and Fixing
Deadlines Plan and Disclosure due by March 29, 2019, because the
Order was entered in error.

          About Peninsula Research Ormond Beach

Peninsula Research Ormond Beach, LLC, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
18-04498) on July 27, 2018.  In the petition signed by Angel Ribo,
CEO and president, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000
and liabilities of less than $500,000.  The Debtor is represented
by the Law Offices of Scott W. Spradley, P.A.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of Peninsula Research Ormond Beach, LLC as of
Sept. 17, according to a court docket.


PERIWINKLE PARTNERS: May 21 Confirmation Hearing on Region's Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Disclosure Statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan of
Liquidation filed by Regions Bank for Periwinkle Partners LLC is
conditionally approved.

The Court will conduct a hearing on confirmation of Regions' Plan,
including timely filed objections to confirmation, objections to
the Disclosures, motions for cramdown, applications for
compensation, and motions for allowance of administrative claims on
Tuesday, May 21, 2019, at 1:30 p.m.

Parties in interest shall submit to the Clerk's office their
written ballot accepting or rejecting Regions' Plan no later than
eight days before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

Objections to confirmation will be filed and served no later than
seven days before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

The Plan Proponent shall file a ballot tabulation no later than two
days prior to the Confirmation Hearing.

A full-text copy of the Plan is available at
http://tinyurl.com/y46zuagtfrom PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                 About Periwinkle Partners

Periwinkle Partners LLC, a company based in Sanibel, Florida, filed
a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 18-06721) on Aug.
13, 2018.  In the petition signed by Charles Phoenix, manager, the
Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and
liabilities.  The case has been assigned to Judge Caryl E. Delano.
Robert N. Bassel, Esq., is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


POINTCLEAR SOLUTIONS: To Pay Unsecureds in Full Over 5 Years
------------------------------------------------------------
PointClear Solutions, Inc. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Alabama a disclosure statement for its
chapter 11 plan dated March 26, 2019.

Class 2 under the plan consists of the Allowed Unsecured Claims of
all other unsecured creditors. The Allowed Unsecured Claims of the
unsecured creditors will be paid from 50% of the Net Plan Profits
of Debtor for five years or until paid in full. Based upon the
Claims Analysis and the Proforma projections, the anticipated
distribution to unsecured creditors are projected to be as follows:
Year 1= $124,675; Year 2= $113,014; Year 3= $248,014; Year 4=
$324,514; Year 5= $260,19.

The Debtor desires to enter into plan financing arrangement with
the Karabinos Living Trust the form of which are contained in the
Commercial Financing Agreement. The Debtor may call upon the Trust
to loan the Debtor money to cover shortfalls in secured loan
payments or other operating needs during the term of the Plan.

The Trust ("Guarantor Trust") has pledged $450,000 in marketable
securities as additional collateral for Progress Bank. The
Guarantor Trust, by agreement, will not dissipate or distribute
trust corpus to its beneficiaries, other than funding reasonable
contributions of capital (by loan) to the Debtor. In the event a
payment is not made by the Debtor to Progress Bank pursuant to this
Plan, and upon five business days’ notice in writing to the
Guarantor Trust, Progress Bank may draw upon the pledged
securities.

The operations of the Debtor will fund the Plan. The changes
implemented by the Debtor in reducing costs of leased premises,
reduced employee costs and other expenses contemplated going
forward.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 26, 2019 is
available at http://tinyurl.com/y6p9wrwefrom Pacermonitor.com at
no charge.

                About PointClear Solutions

PointClear Solutions, Inc., is a healthcare software development
company based in Huntsville, Alabama.

PointClear Solutions filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case no. 18-83286) on Nov.
2, 2018.  At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated $100,001 to
$500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.
Judge Clifton R. Jessup Jr. preside over the case.  Stuart M.
Maples, at Maples Law Firm, PC, is the Debtor's counsel.


PREFERRED CARE: To Sell Ownership of Management Units in New Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Preferred Care Partners Management Group, L.P., and Kentucky
Partners Management, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Texas an amended disclosure statement
explaining their amended joint chapter 11 plan of liquidation dated
March 22, 2019.

Under the amended plan, the Debtors will now liquidate instead of
reorganize by selling their ownership of the Management
Subsidiaries and Affiliates and monetizing estate Causes of Action
against certain Insiders and Affiliates.  

The new Plan proposes to establish a pool of cash, referred to in
the Plan as the "Creditor Funds," which will be used to pay
Creditors under the Plan. The Creditor Funds will be established
from two settlements and the proceeds from the sale of PCPMG’s
Management Subsidiaries and Affiliates. In exchange for the
releases provided under each settlement, the Trust will receive
over $1 million of Cash, which will be used to satisfy priority
claims, non-dischargeable claims owed to governmental authorities,
and vendor rejection damage claims. The remaining funds will be
conveyed to a Trust, along with the remaining Estate Causes of
Action. A Liquidating Trustee, with the oversight of a Trust board,
will then determine how best to utilize the remaining Creditor
Funds to administer Claims, distribute Trust Assets and pursue
Reserved Causes of Action.

General Unsecured Creditors who wish to pursue recoveries under
third-party insurance policies will be allowed to do so under the
Plan.

The plan also discloses that On Dec. 4, 2014, the Office of the
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico filed a lawsuit styled
State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General v.
Cathedral Rock Corporation, et. al., D-101-CV-2014-02535 in the New
Mexico First Judicial District Court on behalf of the State of New
Mexico. The New Mexico OAG Action did not initially pursue claims
against the Debtors--it focused on claims against the prior owners
and operators of the New Mexico Facilities. On April 1, 2015, the
New Mexico OAG filed its First Amended Complaint, asserting five
causes of action against the following additional defendants.

A copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available at
http://tinyurl.com/y4wkgr2cfrom Pacermonitor.com at no charge.  

              About Preferred Care Partners

Headquartered in Plano, Texas, Preferred Care Partners Management
Group and Kentucky Partners operate skilled nursing care
facilities.

Preferred Care Partners Management Group, L.P., and affiliate
Kentucky Partners Management, LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-34296 and 17-34297) on
Nov. 13, 2017.  Travis Eugene Lunceford, manager of general
partner, signed the petition.  The jointly administered cases were
later transferred to the Fort Worth Division and assigned Case No.
17-44741.

Mark Edward Andrews, Esq., Jane Anne Gerber, Esq., and Aaron
Michael Kaufman, Esq., at Dykema Cox Smith, serve as the Debtors'
bankruptcy counsel.

Preferred Care estimated its assets at between $50,000 and
$100,000, and its liabilities at between $10,000,000 and
$50,000,000.  Kentucky Partners estimated its assets at up to
$50,000 and its liabilities at between $10,000,000 and $50,000,000.


QUALITY CONSTRUCTION: Committee Seeks Amendment of ESNA Disclosures
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors objects to the first
amended disclosure statement filed by Energy Services Note
Acquisition LLC for Quality Construction & Production, LLC and
affiliates.

The committee complains that the Disclosure Statement does not, nor
does the accompanying Plan, estimate or indicate what any
deficiency claim of any secured class including any subrogee of
ESNA will or might be. The DS does not indicate how any deficiency
claim of any secured creditor is determined.

There is no explanation of or description of any Disbursing Agent
or what entity or party is responsible for disbursement of any plan
payments. The DS seems to assume payments will be made by the
Reorganized Debtor. The DS does not give sufficient detail as to
the duties and responsibilities of any Disbursing Agent.

The DS  also does not describe in any significant detail the claims
adjustment process. Specifically, the Committee suggests that
either the DS provide for the specific amount to be distributed to
the unsecured creditor class or alternatively that the DS and Plan
provide for the obtaining of a post-confirmation order in aid of
consummation of the Plan that details with specificity the amount
each allowed unsecured claim will receive. Also there should be
some indication in the DS as to the claims to which the Reorganized
Debtor(s) will object thus allowing the potential target of an
objection to know prior to casting its vote whether or not an
objection to its claim will be filed.

The Committee asks the Court to require ESNA to amend its DS to
address the issues raised in this objection.

A copy of the Committee's Objection is available at
http://tinyurl.com/y636xqzmfrom donlinrecano.com.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that ESNA
increased the unsecured creditors’ recovery to 14-22%.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y6lexc6m from Donlin Recano at no charge.

Counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors:

    H. Kent Aguillard, Esq.
    H. KENT AGUILLARD
    141 S. 6th Street
    P. O. Drawer 391
    Eunice, Louisiana 70535
    P (337) 457-9331
    F (337) 457-2917
    Email: kaguillard@yhalaw.com

        About Quality Construction & Production LLC

Quality Construction & Production, LLC, and its subsidiaries
operate a group of oilfield service companies in the areas of
onshore and offshore fabrication, installation, and production
operations in Youngsville, Louisiana, and together employ
approximately 850 people.  The Company's onshore fabrication
services include spool piping, production modules, manifolds, deck
extensions, and riser guards and clamps.  QCP's offshore services
include hook-ups, facilities maintenance/upgrades, compressor
installations and field welding.  Quality Construction was founded
by Nathan Granger and Troy Collins in 2001.

Quality Construction & Production, LLC, and three affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. La. Lead Case No. 18-50303) on
March 16, 2018.  In the petition signed by Nathan Granger,
president, Quality Construction estimated $10 million to $50
million in assets and debt.

The Hon. Robert Summerhays is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Weinstein & St. Germain, LLC, as their
bankruptcy counsel; Elmore Consulting, LLC, as financial
consultant; and Donlin, Recano & Company as claims and noticing
agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee for Region 5 appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors on April 23, 2018.  The Committee
hired H. Kent Aguillard as counsel.


QUALITY CONSTRUCTION: Guarantors Object to ESNA's New Plan Outline
------------------------------------------------------------------
Guarantors Troy D. Collins and Nathan C. Granger filed an objection
to Energy Services Note Acquisition, LLC's latest disclosure
statement for Quality Construction & Production, LLC and
affiliates.

The guarantors assert that the proposed Disclosure Statement is
inadequate and deficient in multiple respects. Absent additional
disclosure, the current iteration by ESNA should not be
disseminated to creditors.

The guarantors complain, among other things, that:

The proffered ESNA Disclosure Statement fails to disclose that ESNA
is a competitor (or that it is controlled by competitors) of the
debtors and seeks a takeover as an investment opportunity and not
merely as a creditor.

The proffered ESNA Disclosure Statement does not disclose that
there is a real possibility that ESNA’s vote may be designated or
disqualified, and, thus, it may well fail to carry an impaired
class.

The proposed Disclosure Statement fails to reveal the means by
which its plan is to be funded, the risks associated with that
funding or who will provide that funding.

The proffered ESNA Disclosure Statement fails to disclose that,
upon information and belief, ESNA (or an affiliate of ESNA)
purchased (or intends to purchase) additional claims in an unlawful
attempt to block the debtors’ plan not to maximize its recovery
on its claim(s) but to advance strategic investment interests as a
competitor and hopeful owner of the debtors' strategic assets.

A copy of the Guarantors' Objection is available at
http://tinyurl.com/y2wqc2kjfrom donlinrecano.com at no charge.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that under the
latest ESNA plan, holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims are
now estimated to recoup 14-22% under the ESNA Plan, an increase
from the 7-11% under the previously filed plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y6lexc6m from Donlin Recano at no charge.

Counsel for Mr. Collins and Mr. Granger:

     William H.L. Kaufman, Esq.
     P. O. Drawer 52606
     1313 West Pinhook Road (70503)
     Lafayette, Louisiana 70505-2606
     Telephone: (337) 232-2606
     Facsimile: (337) 232-9867

        About Quality Construction & Production LLC

Quality Construction & Production, LLC, and its subsidiaries
operate a group of oilfield service companies in the areas of
onshore and offshore fabrication, installation, and production
operations in Youngsville, Louisiana, and together employ
approximately 850 people.  The Company's onshore fabrication
services include spool piping, production modules, manifolds, deck
extensions, and riser guards and clamps.  QCP's offshore services
include hook-ups, facilities maintenance/upgrades, compressor
installations and field welding.  Quality Construction was founded
by Nathan Granger and Troy Collins in 2001.

Quality Construction & Production, LLC, and three affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. La. Lead Case No. 18-50303) on
March 16, 2018.  In the petition signed by Nathan Granger,
president, Quality Construction estimated $10 million to $50
million in assets and debt.

The Hon. Robert Summerhays is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Weinstein & St. Germain, LLC, as their
bankruptcy counsel; Elmore Consulting, LLC, as financial
consultant; and Donlin, Recano & Company as claims and noticing
agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee for Region 5 appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors on April 23, 2018.  The Committee
hired H. Kent Aguillard as counsel.


QUALITY CONSTRUCTION: Wants Court to Reject ESNA's Disclosures
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtors Quality Construction & Production, LLC, Quality Production
Management, LLC, Traco Production Services, Inc., and Quality
Acquisition Company, LLC filed an objection to Energy Services Note
Acquisition, LLC's latest proposed disclosure statement for the
Debtors.

The Debtors complain that ESNA's Disclosure Statement is deficient
in that it fails to disclose information required by a hypothetical
investor to make an informed judgment about ESNA's plan. The
following information is missing from ESNA's Disclosure Statement:

A. The sources and availability of ESNA's funding.

B. The history of ESNA, including formation, ownership, and
circumstances leading to the purchase of the MidSouth Bank debt.

C. Approximate percentage of their claims that unsecured creditors
will receive.

D. The impact of any deficiency claims of secured creditors on the
unsecured pool. ESNA's Disclosure Statement gives no estimate of
these deficiency claims to allow unsecured creditors to determine
their dividends to be paid under ESNA's plan.

E. The disposition of the Debtors' causes of action against The
Stone Street Group and others for violation of the non-disclosure
agreement.

The Debtors also assert that ESNA’s liquidation analysis (Exhibit
C) uses the Debtors' numbers for assets valuations. ESNA must use
its own numbers in this analysis unless ESNA is accepting the
Debtors' valuations for each of those assets. ESNA cannot use the
Debtors' valuations now and then turn around and assert higher
values at confirmation.

The Debtors request that the approval of ESNA's Disclosure
Statement be denied.

A full-text copy of the Debtors’ Objection is available at
http://tinyurl.com/y2b7n9r2from donlinrecano.com at no charge.  

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that under the
latest ESNA plan, holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims are
now estimated to recoup 14-22% under the ESNA Plan, an increase
from the 7-11% under the previously filed plan.

        About Quality Construction & Production LLC

Quality Construction & Production, LLC, and its subsidiaries
operate a group of oilfield service companies in the areas of
onshore and offshore fabrication, installation, and production
operations in Youngsville, Louisiana, and together employ
approximately 850 people.  The Company's onshore fabrication
services include spool piping, production modules, manifolds, deck
extensions, and riser guards and clamps.  QCP's offshore services
include hook-ups, facilities maintenance/upgrades, compressor
installations and field welding.  Quality Construction was founded
by Nathan Granger and Troy Collins in 2001.

Quality Construction & Production, LLC, and three affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. La. Lead Case No. 18-50303) on
March 16, 2018.  In the petition signed by Nathan Granger,
president, Quality Construction estimated $10 million to $50
million in assets and debt.

The Hon. Robert Summerhays is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Weinstein & St. Germain, LLC, as their
bankruptcy counsel; Elmore Consulting, LLC, as financial
consultant; and Donlin, Recano & Company as claims and noticing
agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee for Region 5 appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors on April 23, 2018.  The Committee
hired H. Kent Aguillard as counsel.


READING EAGLE: April 2 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, Acting United States Trustee, for Region 3, will hold an
organizational meeting on April 2, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. in the
bankruptcy cases of Reading Eagle Company and WEEU Broadcasting
Company.

The meeting will be held at:

        Office of the United States Trustee
        833 Chestnut Street, Suite 501
        Philadelphia, PA 19107

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it
represents.

                      About Reading Eagle

Reading Eagle Company -- https://www.readingeagle.com -- is the
publisher of the Reading Eagle newspaper in Reading, Pennsylvania.
Reading Eagle Company was incorporated in 1904. WEEU Broadcasting
Company --http://weeu.com-- is a subdidiary of Reading Eagle that
operates a radio station.

Reading Eagle and WEEU filed for bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.
Penn, Case No. 19-11728) on March 20, 2019.  The petition was
signed by Shawn Moliato, CFO. Hon. Richard Fiehling presides over
the cases.

The Debtors estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and
estimated debts of $10 million to $50 million.

The Debtors tapped Stevens & Lee P.C. as counsel.


RUNWAY HOSPITALITY: Case Summary & 6 Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Runway Hospitality, LLC
        c/o Alex Trapote, Managerial Member
        18005 Eastex Freeway
        Humble, TX 77396

Business Description: Runway Hospitality is a lessor of real
                      estate headquartered in Humble, Texas.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 28, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas (Corpus Christi)

Case No.: 19-20138

Judge: Hon. David R. Jones

Debtor's Counsel: Jarrod B. Martin, Esq.
                  MCDOWELL HETHERINGTON LLP
                  1001 Fannin St., Suite 2700
                  Houston, TX 77002
                  Tel: 713-337-5580
                  Fax: 713-337-8850
                  Email: Jarrod.Martin@mhllp.com

                      - and -

                  Megan Young-John, Esq.
                  MCDOWELL HETHERINGTON LLP
                  1001 Fannin, Ste 2700
                  Houston, TX 77002
                  Tel: 713-337-5580
                  Email: megan.young@mhllp.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Alexander Trapote, managerial member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's six unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb19-20138.pdf


SCHULTE PROPERTIES: CitiMortgage Opposes Approval of Disclosures
----------------------------------------------------------------
Secured creditor CitiMortgage, Inc., filed an objection to the
approval of Schulte Properties LLC's disclosure statement and the
confirmation of the proposed plan.

First, Citi complains that the Disclosure Statement fails to
contain adequate information regarding the Borrowers' First
Bankruptcy Case and defaults. Citi asserts the proposed Chapter 11
Plan is patently unconfirmable as it proposes to modify the
confirmed Plan from the Borrowers’ First Bankruptcy. The First
Plan has been substantially consummated and remains in effect.
Section 1127 prohibits SPLLC from modifying the terms of the Plan,
in this case, absent a showing of a significant unforeseen change
in circumstances justifying the second filing. SPLLC has failed to
meet its burden.

Second, Citi submits the present Bankruptcy Case was filed in bad
faith. The instant petition represents the third bankruptcy filing
involving the same parties and same real properties. Although SPLLC
attempts to distinguish itself from the original Borrowers, it is
clear Melani Schulte is the alter ego, sole owner, and managing
member of SPLLC. As a result, SPLLC will be unable to satisfy the
good faith requirement of §1129(a)(3).

Third, to the extent the Court concludes SPLLC is a separate party
with the ability to modify the confirmed Plan from the First Case,
Citi asserts the parties lack privity of contract. SPLLC is not an
obligor under the Subject Loan documents. Nor was SPLLC a party to
the Confirmed Plan from the First Case. As a result, SPLLC lacks
standing to modify the terms of the Subject Loan.

Fourth, the Plan violates the absolute priority rule. The Plan does
not provide for Citi's claim in full, while SPLLC attempts to
retain an interest in the Property as a junior class member in
violation of the absolute priority rule. Citi has rejected the
Plan. Therefore, the Plan violates the absolute priority rule and
cannot be confirmed.

Fifth, SPLLC proposes to reduce the principal balance below the
scheduled value of the Property, without providing for the cure of
the contractual arrears.

A full-text copy of Citi's Objection is available at
http://tinyurl.com/y23wrbqcfrom Pacermonitor.com at no charge.  

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that the Debtor
believes that it will have enough cash on hand on the effective
date of the Plan to pay all the claims and expenses that are
entitled to be paid on that date. Debtors believes that it will
have sufficient cash generated through operations to make the
payments under the Plan. In the event that additional cash is
needed, the Debtor may, at its discretion, sell one or more of its
properties to facilitate plan payments.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated February 27,
2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y3mnnzwo from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for Creditor CitiMortgage, Inc.:

     Eddie R. Jimenez, Esq.
     Raymond Jereza, Esq.
     ALDRIDGE PITE, LLP
     520 South 4th St., Suite 360
     Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
     Telephone: (858) 750-7600
     Facsimile: (619) 590-1385
     Email: ejimenez@aldridgepite.com
            rjereza@aldridgepite.com

                  About Schulte Properties

Schulte Properties LLC is the fee simple owner of various real
properties located in Las Vegas and Henderson, Nevada.  The Company
previously sought protection from creditors on May 31, 2017 (Bankr.
D. Nev. Case No. 17-12883).

Schulte Properties filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Nev. Case No. 18-12734) on May 10, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Melani Schulte, managing member, the Debtor estimated $10 million
to $50 million in assets and liabilities.  The case is assigned to
Judge Laurel E. Babero.  The Debtor is represented by Matthew L.
Johnson, Esq., at Johnson & Gubler P.C., as counsel.


SERTA SIMMONS: S&P Cuts ICR to 'CCC+' Due to Underperformance
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating to 'CCC+' from
'B-' on U.S.-based Serta Simmons Bedding LLC whose operating
performance deteriorated in the fourth quarter of 2018 well below
the rating agency's expectations due to large volume declines with
top customers and industry headwinds, leading to adjusted leverage
increasing to near 11x as of Dec. 29, 2018.

The rating agency lowered the company's issuer credit rating as it
now expects these adverse operating trends to continue, keeping
leverage weak in the double-digit range and free operating cash
flow (FOCF) negative over the next 12 months.

S&P lowered its ratings on the first-lien senior secured term loan
to 'CCC+' from 'B-' and on second-lien senior secured term loan to
'CCC-' from 'CCC'. Recovery ratings are unchanged at '3' and '6',
respectively.

The downgrade reflects S&P's expectation for adjusted leverage to
remain above 11x and FOCF to be negative over the next two years.

"The negative outlook reflects our belief that Serta depends upon
favorable business, financial, and economic conditions to meet its
financial commitments, although we do not foresee a credit or
payment crisis over the next 12 months," S&P said.

The negative outlook reflects the potential for a lower rating if
operating performance continues to deteriorate, leading to
liquidity constraints or a near-term risk of default as the
company's financial commitments appear unsustainable unless
restructured. This could occur if business with its top customers
continues to decline or consumer discretionary spending trends
worsen from weak macroeconomic conditions. Additionally, S&P would
consider a downgrade if a distressed exchange appears likely over
the next 12 months.

S&P could raise the ratings if operating performance improves,
leading to positive FOCF, adjusted leverage below 10x, and EBITDA
interest coverage approaching 1.5x. This could occur if the company
curbs sales and EBITDA declines from successful restructuring
initiatives or higher volumes.


SERVICEMASTER GLOBAL: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms BB- ICR
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on the Memphis, Tenn.-based
ServiceMaster Global Holdings Inc. (ServiceMaster) and its
subsidiary The ServiceMaster Co. LLC to stable from negative to
reflect that it will reduce its leverage to the low-3x area, which
compares with the mid-4x area prior to the debt reduction.

At the same time, S&P affirmed all of its ratings on ServiceMaster,
including its 'BB-' issuer credit rating, because it is performing
slightly better than S&P expected, particularly in its Terminix
division.

The outlook revision reflects that ServiceMaster has successfully
completed the planned separation of its home warranty businesses
(Frontdoor) and has used the proceeds from the sale of its equity
stake to pay down debt, resulting in leverage improving to the
low-3x area from the mid-4x area at the end of 2018. The company's
performance has been in-line with S&P's expectations as its digital
platform investments have yielded positive results, including some
organic growth in its Terminix division in 2018.

"The stable outlook on ServiceMaster reflects our expectation that
the company's leverage will remain around 3x over the next 12-24
months as it invests in its platform initiatives and undertakes
tuck-in acquisitions. We expect the company to grow organically as
it expands into the commercial channel. In addition, its improved
digital platform should assist it in taking market share from its
competitors," S&P said.  The rating agency also expects
ServiceMaster to use most of its free operating cash flow for
bolt-on acquisitions and moderate share repurchase activity while
it maintains leverage near current levels.

"We could raise our ratings on ServiceMaster if the company expands
into faster-growing channels such as the commercial segment or
adjacent product categories while maintaining margins near current
levels. The company recently divested a large business segment.
Therefore, we want to see how its business strategies evolve with
respect to both organic and inorganic growth," S&P said.  For S&P
to upgrade ServiceMaster, the company would need to maintain its
existing financial policy, including sustaining adjusted leverage
of between 3.0x and 3.5x.

S&P could lower its ratings on ServiceMaster if the company
sustains leverage of more than 4x. This could occur if increased
competition causes the company to lose significant share to its
competitors and reduces its EBITDA by 20%. S&P could also lower its
ratings if the company's financial policy becomes more aggressive
with debt-funded acquisitions or excess shareholder returns such
that its leverage increases above 4x. The rating agency estimates
that the company's outstanding debt would need to increase by
approximately $350 million at current EBITDA level for this to
occur.


SKYFUEL INC: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------
Alleged Debtor:       Skyfuel, Inc.
                        dba ReflecTech
                      200 Union Blvd., Suite 590
                      Lakewood, CO 80228

Business Description: Founded in 2007, Skyfuel, Inc. --
                      http://www.skyfuel.com-- designs,
                      manufactures and deploys complete solar
                      field solutions featuring the SkyTrough and
                      SkyTroughDSP parabolic trough concentrating
                      solar collectors.  SkyFuel is the solar
                      thermal technology arm of the Sunshine Kaidi
                      New Energy Group Co., Ltd. (Kaidi), a multi-
                      billion dollar energy company based in
                      Wuhan, China.

Involuntary Chapter
11 Petition Date:     March 29, 2019

Court:                United States Bankruptcy Court
                      District of Colorado (Denver)

Case No.:             19-12400

Judge:                Hon. Joseph G. Rosania Jr.

Petitioners' Counsel: Jonathan M. Dickey, Esq.
                      BUECHLER LAW OFFICE, LLC
                      999 18th St.
                      Suite 1230-S
                      Denver, CO 80202
                      Tel: 720-381-0045
                      Email: jonathan@kjblawoffice.com

List of Petitioning Creditors:

       Name                     Nature of Claim  Claim Amount
    -----------                 ---------------  ------------
Nathan Schuknecht                    Wages           $38,090
2310 Table Heights Drive
Golden, CO 80401

Matthew Gray                         Wages           $15,716
913 Eldorado Lane
Louisville, CO 80027

Wurth Timberline Fasteners,Inc.   Trade Debt         $72,693
Debra Wolfe, CFO
6195 Clermont Street
Commerce City, CO 80022

HAWE North America, Inc.          Trade Debt         $59,990
Kristina Smith, CFO
9009-K Perimiter Woods Drive
Charlotte, NC 28216

The Kinetic Co., Inc.             Trade Debt         $30,420  
Jared Masters, President
PO Box 200
Greendale, WI 53129

A full-text copy of the Involuntary Petition is available for free
at: http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob19-12400.pdf


SNEED SHIPBUILDING: 5th Cir. Upholds Dismissal of NII Appeal
------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned NEW INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, Appellant, v.
ALLISON D. BYMAN, Chapter 11 Trustee of Sneed Shipbuilding,
Incorporated; ESTATE OF MARTIN M. SNEED, SR., Appellees, No.
18-40350 (5th Cir.), the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
affirms the district court's dismissal of the appeal filed by New
Industries, Inc.

In bankruptcy, the right to appeal must sometimes give way to a
heightened interest in finality. Perhaps the most prominent example
is equitable mootness, a judicially created doctrine preventing
appeals that threaten to unravel a particularly interrelated
confirmation plan. Bars on appeals can also be found in the
Bankruptcy Code, such as the statute that prevents "reversal or
modification on appeal of an authorization . . . of a sale or lease
of [estate] property" unless that order was stayed pending appeal.


Sneed Shipbuildingfiled for bankruptcy in 2016 and, after
reorganizing turned tumultuous, the court appointed a trustee. The
trustee then filed a complaint against the probate estate of Sneed
Shipbuilding's longtime principal Martin Sneed and several other
Sneed family members. The complaint alleged that Martin attempted
to fraudulently transfer ownership of the Channelview shipyard to
himself, among other fraudulent activities. It sought to avoid
those transactions and have the court declare that Sneed
Shipbuilding was the true titleholder to the Channelview shipyard.

While the bankruptcy progressed slowly, operations at the
Channelview shipyard ground to a halt as a barebones staff serviced
the one remaining customer. Conversion to Chapter 7 and liquidation
loomed as a real and unpleasant possibility, so the trustee tried
to sell the shipyard. San Jac Marine was interested in purchasing
it, but only if the bankruptcy estate and Martin's probate estate
resolved their dispute over the title. To get clean title, the
trustee had two undesirable options: years of litigation against
the probate estate, during which the shipyard would lose much of
its value, or settlement with the probate estate on unfavorable
terms. She chose the latter.

The sale to San Jac Marine was made conditional on bankruptcy
approval of the settlement. The parties structured the settlement
and sale together along these lines: San Jac Marine paid Sneed
Shipbuilding nearly $15 million and the trustee used those funds to
ensure that the title it transferred was clean; encumbrances from a
secured creditor, the debtor-in-possession's lender, and property
taxes were all paid off. In addition, Martin's probate estate gave
up both its claim to the Channelview property and any other claims
in the bankruptcy for about $8 million and the trustee's agreement
to release any other avoidance actions. All told the settlement and
sale looked something like this:

The bankruptcy court approved the settlement and sale in a single
order, finding its provisions "non-severable and mutually
dependent." New Industries, an unsecured creditor which claimed
that Sneed Shipbuilding owed it $550,000 from a construction
contract, unsuccessfully objected to the disbursement of funds to
the probate estate. It did not seek a stay of the court's approval
of the transaction.

New Industries appealed. The trustee asked the district court to
dismiss the appeal, citing both equitable mootness and 11 U.S.C.
section 363(m). The district court dismissed the appeal as moot
without identifying whether it was applying equitable or statutory
mootness.

Recognizing the role of section 363(m), New Industries says it does
not challenge the sale of the property but only challenges the
disbursement of cash to the probate estate. But it does not cite
any authority that would allow us to perform this isolated
analysis. Paying off the probate estate was an essential feature of
the sale. And when creditors have tried to cut off part of a sale
and challenge it elsewhere, courts have found their appeals moot.
Without the more than $8 million payment, the probate estate would
not have released its claim that it owned the Channelview shipyard.
And without that release, San Jac Marine likely would have walked
away from the deal. As the bankruptcy court noted, there is no way
to sever the settlement from the sale; they are mutually dependent.
Congress has ordered us not to review such decisions by the
bankruptcy court when they are not stayed. This case is moot.

A copy of the Court's Decision dated Feb. 5, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2CMJ0HN from Leagle.com.

Richard Lee Fuqua, II, for Appellee.

Barnet Bernard Skelton, Jr., for Appellant.

Philip Guy Eisenberg, for Appellee.

Steven Douglas Shurn, for Appellee.

William Steven Bryant, for Appellee.

Simon Richard Mayer, for Appellee.

                   About Sneed Shipbuilding

Sneed Shipbuilding, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 16-60014) on March 4,
2016.  The petition was signed by Clyde E. Sneed, president.  The
Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and debt of
$10 million to $50 million.

The case is assigned to Judge David R. Jones.  

The Debtor was represented by Amber Michelle Chambers, Esq., Eric
Michael VanHorn, Esq., and Nicholas Zugaro, Esq., at McCathern,
PLLC.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed five creditors of Sneed
Shipbuilding to serve on an official committee of unsecured
creditors.

On Nov. 3, 2016, the court appointed Allison D. Byman as the
Chapter 11 trustee.  The Trustee is represented by Hughes Watters
Askanase, LLP.


SOUTHERN ILLINOIS FAMILY: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Southern Illinois Family Fun Center, Inc.
           aka SI Bowl
        10240 Samuel Road
        Carterville, IL 62918

Business Description: Southern Illinois Family Fun Center
                      owns and operates a bowling alley in
                      Carterville, Illinois with regular bowling,
                      duckpin bowling, arcade, snack bar, and a
                      lounge.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 28, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Illinois (Benton)

Case No.: 19-40241

Judge: Hon. Laura K. Grandy

Debtor's Counsel: Steven M. Wallace, Esq.
                  HEPLERBROOM, LLC
                  130 N Main St
                  PO Box 510
                  Edwardsville, IL 62025
                  Tel: (618) 307-1185
                       (618) 656-0184
                  Fax: (855) 656-1364
                  Email: steven.wallace@heplerbroom.com

Estimated Assets: $50,000 to $100,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by John Steven Ludwig, president.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilsb19-40241.pdf


ST. ALBANS CLEANERS: May 8 Plan and Disclosure Statement Hearing
----------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Frank. W. Volk conditionally approved St. Albans
Cleaners and Launderers, Inc.'s small business disclosure statement
referring to its chapter 11 plan.

May 1, 2019 is fixed as the last day to file and serve any written
objection to the Disclosure Statement and to confirmation of the
Chapter 11 Plan, and the last day to file acceptances or rejections
of the Chapter 11 Plan.

A hearing on final approval of the disclosure statement and
confirmation of the chapter 11 plan will be held at 1:30 p.m. on
May 8, 2019, in Bankruptcy Courtroom A, 6400 Robert C. Byrd United
States Courthouse, 300 Virginia Street East, Charleston, West
Virginia.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that under the
plan, general unsecured creditors are classified in Class 3 and
will receive a distribution of 11% of their allowed claims to be
distributed in quarterly payments.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 1, 2019 is available
at https://tinyurl.com/yy4cj9zz from Pacermonitor.com at no
charge.

         About St. Albans Cleaners and Launderers

St. Albans Cleaners and Launderers, Inc., sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Case No.
17-20432) on August 17, 2017. Lillian J. Edwards, its president,
signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets and liabilities of less than $500,000.

Judge Frank W. Volk presides over the case. Pepper & Nason
represents the Debtor as bankruptcy counsel.


STEPHEN M. EHRICH: Long Buying Manasuan Property for $500K
----------------------------------------------------------
Stephen M. Ehrich asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of New Jersey to authorize the sale of the real property located at
Lot 1, Block 120 on the Tax Map of the Borough of Manasquan,
Monmouth County, New Jersey, commonly known as 344 Cedar Avenue,
Manasquan, New Jersey, to Michael J. Long for $500,000.  

The Property has been listed for sale since March 3, 2019.  On
March 3, 2019, the Debtor and the Buyer entered into a contract for
the sale of the Property for the asking price of $500,000.  There
are no agreements between the Debtor and the Buyer other than as
set forth in the Contract.  The Debtor submits that the Contract
represents fair market value of the Property.  

The Contract of Sale provides for an anticipated closing date of
April 24, 2019.  Pursuant to the terms of the Contract, the Debtor
must deliver possession of the Property to the Buyer at the time of
closing.

There is a mortgage on the Property owed to FCI Lender Services,
Inc. as servicer for Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, doing
business as Christiana Trust, as Owner Trustee of the Residential
Credit Opportunities Trust V, in the approximate amount of
$721,929.  The Lender has approved the sale.

The Debtor asks to sell the Property free and clear of the any and
all liens and judgments, including, but not limited to, the
mortgages and any potential liens of the Internal Revenue Service.


The Debtor does not expect to receive any proceeds from the sale of
the Property after payment of all closing costs and customary
closing fees.  However, it is important to the Debtor to not have
an involuntary foreclosure on his credit record which may prevent a
future home purchase for at least seven years based on present
mortgage lending underwriting standards.

He respectfully asks that the Court allows him to sell the real
estate free and clear of all outstanding liens with valid proven
liens to attach to the proceeds.  These outstanding liens include
but are not limited to an unrecorded lien of the United States of
America with respect to income tax obligations.

The Debtor also asks that the real estate commissions, attorneys’
fees and the realty transfer fee which are subsidized by the Lender
to be paid out of the closing proceeds.

Contemporaneous with the filing of the Motion, the counsel for
Debtor will be filing Applications for Retention of each Real
Estate Broker in the transaction.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Stephen_Ehrich_30_Sales.pdf

A hearing on the Motion is set for April 9, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.  The
objection deadline is April 2, 2019.

Counsel for Debtor:

          Stephen M. Ehrich, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF DARIN D. PINTO, P.C.
          376 South Avenue East
          Westfield, NJ 07090
          Telephone: (908) 317-9405

Stephen M. Ehrich sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. N.J. Case
No. 18-33730) on Dec. 2, 2018.  The Debtor tapped Darin D. Pinto,
Esq., at Law Offices of Darin D. Pinto, P.C. as counsel.



STRATOS ENTERPRISES: Selling West Monroe Property for $450K
-----------------------------------------------------------
Stratos Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Boomers School Supply,
and its senior secured creditor, North Louisiana BIDCO, LLC,
jointly ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of
Louisiana to authorize the private sale of the real property
bearing a municipal address of 132 Well Rd., West Monroe,
Louisiana, for the minimum amount of $450,000, or any amount in
excess of that amount which may be offered.

North Louisiana BIDCO holds a secured interest in the real property
as evidenced by its Proof of Claim filed in the amount of
$1,697,686.  The Debtor has proposed to sell a portion of the
collateral securing the debt to BIDCO.

The parties have obtained a 30 year Mortgage Certificate from the
Clerk of Court, Parish of Ouachita which certificate indicates that
North Louisiana BIDCO is the first mortgage holder and that Spirit
Halloween Superstores, LLC is the second lien holder by virtue of a
judicial mortgage.

The Debtor proposes to sell the property for a sales price of
$450,000 with the Buyer paying all closing costs and with North
Louisiana BIDCO receiving the net sales proceeds, after deduction
of property taxes due.  North Louisiana BIDCO does not oppose the
sale for this price.

The junior lien holder, Spirit Halloween filed an unsecured Proof
of Claim in the amount of $101,880.

The Counsel for North Louisiana BIDCO has discussed the matter with
counsel for Spirit Halloween and the junior lien holder, Spirit
Halloween does not oppose the sale of the property.

By virtue of the Joint Motion, the parties respectfully ask that
the Court approves the sale of the property for the minimum amount
of $450,000 or any amount in excess of that amount which may be
offered, at private sale.

The parties submit that no other offers have been received and that
the current offer is the highest and best offer of providing the
most benefit to the bankruptcy estate and partially satisfying the
lien of the senior secured creditor.  

The proposed private sale is to be free and clear of all liens,
claims, encumbrances and interests, with all liens, claims,
encumbrances and secured interests being referred to the proceeds
of the sale.

The parties ask a waiver of the notice requirements under
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(a) and the 14-day stay of an order authorizing
the use, sell, or lease of property under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h).

A hearing on the Motion is set for April 4, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.
Objections, if any, must be filed at least seven days in advance of
the Motion hearing date.

                   About Stratos Enterprises

Stratos Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Boomers School Supply
-- myboomers.net -- located at 2009 Martin Luther King, Jr., Drive
Monroe, LA 71202, is a locally owned and operated company that
operates a store that sells fireworks, school supplies and
inflatable slides.

Stratos Enterprises, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
W.D. La. Case No. 18-31276) on Aug. 11, 2018.  In the petition
signed by Farra Shaw, president, the Debtor estimated assets in the
range of $500,000 to $1 million and $1 million to $10 million in
debt.  Judge Jeffrey P. Norman is the case judge.  The Debtor
tapped James W. Spivey, II, Esq., at James W. Spivey II, as
counsel.


SUNRISE COMMUNICATIONS: Moody's Completes Review, Keeps Ba2 Rating
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Sunrise Communications Group AG and other ratings that
are associated with the same analytical unit. The review was
conducted through a portfolio review in which Moody's reassessed
the appropriateness of the ratings in the context of the relevant
principal methodology(ies), recent developments, and a comparison
of the financial and operating profile to similarly rated peers.
The review did not involve a rating committee. Since January 1,
2019, Moody's practice has been to issue a press release following
each periodic review to announce its completion.

Sunrise's Ba2 rating reflect the company's position as the second
largest mobile network operator in Switzerland, its strong mobile
network quality, its solid cash generation, its good liquidity
profile and Moody's expectation of continued strong commercial
momentum.

The rating also reflects Sunrise's expected increase in adjusted
gross leverage following its proposed acquisition of UPC
Switzerland. Moody's believes Sunrise's increase in leverage
post-transaction is offset by the improved business of the combined
entity and the long-term strategic benefits of the acquisition.


TOTAL FINANCE: Seeks Court Approval of Proposed Plan Outline
------------------------------------------------------------
According to a notice, Total Finance Investment Inc. and its
debtor-affiliates will file on April 23, 2019, at 11:00 a.m.
(prevailing Central Time), a motion for entry of an order approving
the adequacy of their proposed disclosure statement in connection
with a chapter 11 plan.

By this Motion, the Debtors request the entry of the proposed
Disclosure Statement Order (a) approving the Disclosure Statement
(b) approving the procedures (i) soliciting, receiving, and
tabulating votes to accept or reject the Plan, (ii) voting to
accept or reject the Plan, and (iii) filing objections to the Plan;
(c) approving the confirmation schedule; and (d) granting related
relief.  

The Plan generally provides that all proceeds from the collection,
sale, or other disposition of the Debtors' assets (including
through the liquidation of the Debtors' dealership business and
collection of the Debtors' consumer finance portfolio) will be
distributed in prepetition priority order to creditors of the
Debtors (following the payment of any post-petition claims and
expenses).

The Debtors assert that the Disclosure Statement provides "adequate
information" to allow Holders of Claims and Interests in the Voting
Classes to make informed decisions about whether to vote to accept
or reject the Plan. Specifically, the Disclosure Statement contains
a number of categories of information that courts consider
"adequate information," including overview of the Debtors'
operations, key events leading to the decision to commence the
voluntary Chapter 11 cases, and the liquidation analysis.

               About Total Finance Investment

Founded in 2000, Total Finance Investment and its subsidiaries
--http://www.totalfinance.net/-- are operators of buy-here,
pay-here (BHPH) used automobile dealership in Illinois and in the
greater Chicagoland area.  The Company sold used vehicles at their
dealership locations, provided financing to customers to facilitate
their purchase of the Company's vehicles and certain add-on
products, and operated an independent insurance broker through
which the Company helped their customers secure automobile
insurance coverage from third-party insurance providers.

Total Finance Investment Inc. and 6 affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Lead Case No. 19-03734) on Feb. 13,
2019.

The Debtors estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets $50
million to $100 million in liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Hon. Carol A. Doyle oversees the case.

The Debtors tapped Sidley Austin LLP as bankruptcy counsel; Togut,
Segal & Segal LLP as special counsel; Development Specialists,
Inc., as interim management services provider; Portage Point
Partners, LLC, as financial advisor; Keefe, Bruyette & Woods and
Miller Buckfire & Co., LLC as investment banker; and Kurtzman
Carson Consultants LLC as claims and noticing agent.


TPE INDUSTRIES: Plan Outline Hearing Set for April 30
-----------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Jeffery A. Deller will convene a hearing on April
30, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. to consider approval of TPE Industries,
Inc.'s disclosure statement referring to a chapter 11 plan.

Written objections to the disclosure statement must be filed and
served on or before April 23, 2019.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that quarterly
payments will be distributed to general unsecured creditors in the
total amount of approximately $59,000 for three years.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 20, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y5nnehfgfrom PacerMonitor.com  
at no charge.

                  About TPE Industries Inc.

TPE Industries, Inc. -- http://www.tpelectric.net/-- is a family
owned and operated company that provides engineering, design,
installation, construction and commissioning services.  TPE
Industries operates three separate operating divisions as follows:
TP Electric, Inc. (natural gas and oil division); TP Electric &
Power, LLC (industrial and commercial division) and TP Automation,
LLC (industrial automation, PLC's, instrumentation, gas and flame
detection).  The companies serve a wide range of clients and
industries that include natural gas and oil, hi-tech manufacturing,
water treatment facilities, wireless communications, chemical
manufacturing, power generation, power transmission,
telecommunications, metals manufacturing and mining & aggregate.
TPE Industries' main office is in Acme, Pennsylvania.

TPE Industries, Inc. and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case Nos.
18-23447 to 18-23450) on Aug. 30, 2018.  The cases are jointly
administered, with TPE Industries as the lead case.

In the petitions signed by Shawn T. Porter, president, the Debtors
disclosed these assets and liabilities:

                            Total        Total
                            Assets     Liabilities
                          -----------  -----------
TPE Industries, Inc.        $407,717      $339,387
T.P. Electric, Inc.       $2,393,042    $4,903,125
TP Automation, LLC          $219,970       $54,320

Judge Jeffery A. Deller presides over the case.  

Kirk B. Burkley, Esq., at Bernstein-Burkley, P.C., is the Debtor's
legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 cases.


TSC DORSEY RUN: Sale of Real Property to Fund Proposed Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
TSC Dorsey Run Road-Jessup, LLC, filed a disclosure statement for
its proposed chapter 11 plan dated March 21, 2019.

The Plan provides for the sale of the Debtor's principal assets,
the resolution of the allowance of claims and equity interests, and
the distribution to creditors in accordance with the priorities of
the Bankruptcy Code.

Under the plan, each holder of an Allowed Class 3 Priority Claim
will receive a Pro Rata distribution from Available Cash until such
Allowed Class 3 Claims are paid in full. Class 3 is impaired by the
Plan.

Each holder of an Allowed Class 4 General Unsecured Claim will
receive a Pro Rata distribution from Available Cash until such
Allowed Class 4 Claims are paid in full, with interest at the legal
rate. Class 4 is unimpaired by the Plan. No claim has been filed in
this category.

The Plan will be funded by Available Cash from the sale of the Real
Property to Purchaser or Purchasers.

The Reorganized Debtor will utilize all commercially reasonable
efforts to market the Real Property for sale free and clear of all
liens, claims, encumbrances or interests and to bring the proposed
purchase described above to closing. The Debtor is currently
marketing, and will continue to market, the Real Property for sale
either as a single unit or separate lots as shall maximize the sale
price. Additionally, the Debtor proposes to explore creating a
condominium regime applicable to the Real Property in order to
improve both marketability and return.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 21, 2019 is
available at http://tinyurl.com/y5btcmnbfrom Pacermonitor.com at
no charge.

             About TSC Dorsey Run Road-Jessup

TSC Dorsey Run Road - Jessup, LLC, is a privately held company
engaged in activities related to real estate. The Company is the
fee simple owner of a property located at 7869 Dorsey Run Road in
Jessup, Maryland having a current value of $2.45 million.

TSC Dorsey Run Road - Jessup, LLC, based in Columbia, MD, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-25597) on Nov. 28,
2018.  The Hon. Michelle M. Harner presides over the case.  The Law
Offices of David W. Cohen, led by founding partner David W. Cohen,
serves as bankruptcy counsel.  In the petition signed by Bruce S.
Jaffe, manager, the Debtor disclosed $2,450,000 in assets and
$2,359,552 in liabilities.


ULTIMATE SOFTWARE: S&P Assigns 'B-' ICR on Leveraged Buyout
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B-' issuer credit rating to The
Ultimate Software Group Inc., a human capital management solutions
provider based in Weston, Florida.

The rating action follows Ultimate's entry into a definitive
agreement to be acquired by a consortium of private equity
investors.  The $11 billion purchase price, funded by
sponsor-provided equity and $3.2 billion of debt, results in S&P
Global Ratings leverage of 14x as of its most recent 10-K filing
(Dec. 31, 2018).

S&P also assigned its 'B' issue-level rating and '2' recovery
rating to the proposed $2.3 billion first-lien term loan and $275
million revolving credit facility. The privately placed $900
million will be unrated.

"The rating reflects our view of The Ultimate Software Group Inc.'s
expected S&P Global Ratings leverage in the high-11x area over the
next 12 months and negative free operating cash flow (FOCF) of
around $60 million in fiscal 2019, which is heavily affected by the
interest burden (around $250 million annually) from the $3.2
billion debt issuance supporting the buyout ($50 million of which
will be used to pre-fund the PeopleDoc deferred consideration),"
S&P said.  "Offsetting these financial risks is our view of its
strong position in the human capital management (HCM) market, high
retention rates with low customer concentration, an established
public track record of strong revenue, FOCF growth, and stable
operating margins and bookings that provide a high level of
visibility into fiscal 2019 operating performance."

S&P's stable outlook on Ultimate reflects the rating agency's view
of the company's consistent operating profitability and highly
recurring revenue resulting from its SaaS business model, and the
rating agency's  expectation that the company will continue to grow
its revenue base while showing modest improvement in EBITDA margins
over the next 12-24 months.

Although unlikely over the next 12 months given the high leverage
and negative cash flow generation expected, S&P could raise the
rating if the company can reduced leverage to below 8x on a
sustained basis, in addition to generating total annual net cash
before debt repayment at around 2x its annual debt amortization,
given the material cash outflows relating to settling future RSUs.
Ultimate may achieve this over the next 24 months if it can
organically increase revenue in line with past historical rates and
recognizes gross margin expansion from a favorable revenue mix
shift towards recurring revenue and away from services revenue.

"While not expected over the next 12 months, we could lower the
rating if increased competition from other HCM players contributes
to pricing pressure and increased customer attrition, leading to
negative FOCF on a sustained basis and weakening liquidity
(including revolver availability), where we consider there to be an
unsustainable capital structure," S&P said.


UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN: Unsecureds to Get 83.2% in Annual Payments
----------------------------------------------------------------
University Physician Group filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Michigan a combined disclosure statement
and plan of reorganization.

Class 7 under the plan consists of all unsecured claims. Allowed
Unsecured Claims, excluding the Allowed Unsecured Claims of WSU and
FMRE (which are deemed Allowed and subordinated pursuant to the
other terms of the Plan) will be paid pro rata the lesser of
$8,056,253 or 83.2% without interest in equal annual installments
commencing on the Effective Date and continuing on the next 4
anniversary dates of the Effective Date in full satisfaction of
their Claims.

Pursuant to the WSU Financial Accommodations: WSU will have an
Allowed Unsecured Claim in the amount of $6,632,753.42, plus any
lease rejections claims, if applicable; and, FMRE shall have an
Allowed Unsecured Claim in the amount of $1,349,307.43. The Allowed
Unsecured Claims of WSU and FMRE are subordinated to all Allowed
Unsecured Claims for purposes of Plan distribution only, and not
for any other purposes. On account of their Allowed Unsecured
Claims, WSU and FMRE will be paid only the Pro Rata Amount of their
Allowed Claims pursuant to the RSA.

With the assistance of financial and other accommodations being
provided by Wayne State University, Debtor reasonably believes that
its future operations will generate sufficient funds to satisfy its
obligations under the Plan.

To the extent that additional funds are necessary, other third
parties may provide such funds to the Reorganized Debtor. Other
sources of cash may be explored and utilized by the Reorganized
Debtor to the extent that such cash infusions are necessary to meet
the obligations of the Plan. Debtor may also sell all of its assets
or a portion of its assets to fund its obligations under the plan,
subject to the terms of this Plan and any incorporated agreements.

A copy of the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement is available
at http://tinyurl.com/yxewblbofrom Pacermonitor.com at no charge.


            About University Physician Group

University Physician Group -- http://www.wsupgdocs.org/-- is a
non-profit multi-specialty physician practice group in southeast
Michigan, providing primary and specialty care.  Its doctors
provide medical care while conducting groundbreaking research and
continuing education at Wayne State University, one of the nation's
top medical universities.

University Physician Group sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 18-55138) on Nov.
7, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
$10 million to $50 million and liabilities of $10 million to $50
million.  

The case has been assigned to Judge Mark A. Randon.  The Debtor
tapped Steinberg Shapiro & Clark as lead counsel, and Robert
Bassel, Esq., as co-counsel with Steinberg.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 9 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Nov. 26, 2018.  The committee tapped Pepper
Hamilton LLP as its legal counsel.


URUS GROUP: Unsecureds to Get 100% from Sale Proceeds
-----------------------------------------------------
Urus Group LLC, Marcial Solis, and Crestview 3 Holdings LLC, filed
a combined plan of reorganization and accompanying disclosure
statement.

Class 1.  Secured claim of Chemtov Mortgage Group Corp. Chemtov
holds a mortgage against real property owned by debtor Marcial
Solis. Chemtov holds a promissory note from Urus Group. Marcial
Solis is attempting to obtain financing to pay the final judgment
held by Chemtov in full.

Class 3.  This class is impaired and consists of general unsecured
claims. This class shall receive a pro rata distribution of one
hundred percent of allowed claim after deducting payments to
secured creditor Goldsmith of fifteen percent (15%) of the net sale
price of each parcel of property pro rata until this claims are
paid in full. The effective date of the plan will occur thirty (30)
days after the date of confirmation of the Debtor/s Plan of
Reorganization. Payments to unsecured creditors will from the
proceeds of the closing of the sale of each property until each
unsecured creditor is paid in full.

Class 4.  Administrative Convenience Class are impaired. This class
is comprised of unsecured creditors with claims of ten thousand
dollars ($10,00.00) or less or creditors who choose to reduce their
claims to ten thousand dollars ($10,500.00). Creditors in this
class will receive fifty percent (50%) of their allowed claims from
net proceeds the sale of real property and the remainder of their
allowed claims from the sale of the second parcel of real property.


Means for Execution and Implementation of the Plan:

   1. New Value Infusion by the Debtor. The principals of the
debtor will contribute any amounts needed by the debtor to fund the
initial payment under the debtor's plan.

   2. The debtor will fund, other than as described herein, any
other payments due pursuant to the plan from first the sale of the
completed homes.

A full-text copy of the Combined Disclosure Statement dated March
21, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y3cc35we from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                     About Urus Group LLC

Urus Group LLC is a privately-held company whose principal assets
are located at 2627 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida.

Urus Group sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-24730) on Nov. 27, 2018.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets of $1 million
to $10 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  The
case is assigned to Judge Jay A. Cristol.  The Debtor tapped
Richard Siegmeister P.A. as its legal counsel.


VANGUARD NATURAL: Case Summary & 50 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Twelve affiliates that have filed voluntary petitions seeking
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

   Debtor                                              Case No.
   ------                                              --------
   Vanguard Natural Resources, Inc. (Lead Case)        19-31786
      aka VNR Finance Corp.
   5847 San Felipe, Suite 3000
   Houston, TX 77057
   
   Eagle Rock Acquisition Partnership, L.P.            19-31787
   Eagle Rock Acquisition Partnership II, L.P.         19-31788
   Eagle Rock Energy Acquisition Co., Inc.             19-31789
   Eagle Rock Energy Acquisition Co. II, Inc.          19-31790
   Eagle Rock Upstream Development Company, Inc.       19-31791
   Eagle Rock Upstream Development Company II, Inc.    19-31792
   Escambia Asset Co. LLC                              19-31793
   Escambia Operating Co. LLC                          19-31794
   Vanguard Natural Gas, LLC                           19-31795
   Vanguard Operating, LLC                             19-31796
   VNR Holdings, LLC                                   19-31797

Business Description: Vanguard Natural Resources
                      https://www.vnrenergy.com -- is an
                      independent exploration and production
                      company focused on the production and
                      development of oil and natural gas
                      properties in the United States.  Vanguard's
                      assets consist primarily of producing and
                      non-producing oil and natural gas reserves
                      located in the Green River Basin in Wyoming,
                      the Piceance Basin in Colorado, the Permian
                      Basin in West Texas and New Mexico, the
                      Arkoma Basin in Oklahoma, the Gulf Coast
                      Basin in Texas, Louisiana and Alabama, the
                      Big Horn Basin in Wyoming and Montana, the
                      Anadarko Basin in Oklahoma and North Texas,
                      the Wind River Basin in Wyoming and the
                      Powder River Basin in Wyoming.
                      Headquartered in Houston, Texas, the Debtors
                      have 295 employees.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 31, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas (Houston)

Debtors' Counsel:     Brian E. Schartz, P.C.
                      KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
                      KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
                      609 Main Street
                      Houston, Texas 77002
                      Tel: (713) 836-3600
                      Fax: (713) 836-3601
                      Email: brian.schartz@kirkland.com

                        - and -

                      James H.M. Sprayregen, P.C.
                      KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
                      KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
                      300 North LaSalle Street
                      Chicago, Illinois 60654
                      Tel: (312) 862-2000
                      Fax: (312) 862-2200
                      Email: james.sprayregen@kirkland.com

                        - and -

                      Christopher Marcus, P.C.
                      Aparna Yenamandra, Esq.
                      KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
                      KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
                      601 Lexington Avenue
                      New York, New York 10022
                      Tel: (212) 446-4800
                      Fax: (212) 446-4900
                      Email: christopher.marcus@kirkland.com
                             aparna.yenamandra@kirkland.com

Debtors' Co-Counsel:  James T. Grogan, Esq.
                      Philip M. Guffy, Esq.
                      BLANK ROME LLP
                      717 Texas Avenue, Suite 1400
                      Houston, Texas 77002
                      Tel: (713) 228-6601
                      Fax: (713) 228-6605
                      Email: jgrogan@blankrome.com
                      pguffy@blankrome.com

Debtors'
Financial
Advisor and
Investment
Banker:               EVERCORE GROUP L.L.C.

Debtors'
Restructuring
Advisor:              OPPORTUNE LLP

Debtors'
Notice,
Claims &
Balloting
Agent and
Administrative
Advisor:              PRIME CLERK LLC
                      https://cases.primeclerk.com/vnr/

Total Assets at Feb. 28, 2019: $1,477,699,661

Total Debts at Feb. 28, 2019: $1,196,354,335

The petitions were signed by Scott R. Sloan, president and chief
executive officer.

A full-text copy of Vanguard Natural's petition is available for
free at: http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb19-31786.pdf

List of Debtors' 50 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Pinedale Energy Partners          Trade Claim        $2,382,606
Tyler Beaty
6100 South Yale Avenue, Suite 800
Tulsa, OK 74136
Tel: 918‐381‐2482
Fax: 918‐392‐3281
Email: tbeaty@pinedaleep.com

2. WGR Operating LP                  Trade Claim        $2,106,879
Brittany Lutz
1201 Lake Robbins Drive
The Woodlands, TX 77380
Tel: 832‐636‐1000
Email: Brittany.Lutz@anadarko.com

3. XTO Energy Inc.                   Trade Claim          $978,895
Janie Gamboa
22777 Springwoods Village Pkwy
Spring, TX 77389
Tel: 817‐870‐2800
Fax: 817‐870‐2800
Email: janie_gamboa@xtoenergy.com

4. Enterprise Jonah Gas Gathering    Trade Claim          $543,979
Stephanie Moroz
P.O. Box 4324
Houston, TX 77210‐4324
Email: JKHalladay@eprod.com

5. OXY USA Inc.                      Trade Claim          $433,036
Katherine Rosenstein
c/o Occidental Petroleum Corporation
5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 110
Houston, TX 77046‐0521
Tel: 713‐215‐7000
Fax: 713‐215‐7095
Email: katherine_rosenstein@oxy.com

6. White Rock Oil & Gas LLC          Trade Claim          $359,263
Robert Matejek
5810 Tennyson Pkwy Ste 500
Plano, TX 75024
Tel: 214‐981‐1400
Fax: 214‐981‐1401
Email: royaltyinfo@whiterockog.com

7. Powder River Midstream, LLC       Trade Claim          $307,541
Alan J. Brown
200 N Loraine ST #300
Midland, TX 79701
Tel: 432‐682‐6800

8. J‐W Power Company                 Trade Claim         
$280,798
Howard Westerman
15505 Wright Brothers Drive
Addison, TX 75001
Tel: 972‐233‐8191
Fax: 972‐233‐8191
Email: info@jwenergy.com

9. Corterra Energy Operating, LLC    Trade Claim          $250,612
Valerie Mitchell
1717 S Boulder Ave #900
Tulsa, OK 74119
Tel: 918‐615‐0400
Fax: 918‐615‐0399
Email: BCRUMP@CORTERRAENERGY.COM

10. Grand River Gathering LLC        Trade Claim          $247,593
Brock Degeyter
2300 Windy Ridge Parkway #840N
Atlanta, GA 30339
Tel: 770‐504‐5000
Email: info@summitmidstream.com

11. Bachman Services, Inc.           Trade Claim          $241,463
Angela Bachman
2220 South Prospect Avenue
Oklahoma City, OK 73143
Tel: 405‐677‐8296
Fax: 405‐677‐8296

12. Totem Well Service, LLC          Trade Claim          $239,247
63 Lake Arthur Hwy
Artesia, NM 88210
Tel: 575‐746‐6214
Fax: 575‐746‐6214

13. Ray Westall Operating, Inc.      Trade Claim          $228,124
Ray Westall
132447 Highway 82
Loco Hills, NM 88255
Tel: 575‐677‐2370
Fax: 575‐677‐2370

14. Viva Energy Services LLC         Trade Claim          $223,360
David Kimbell, Jr.
700 Avenue E
Odessa, TX 79763
Tel: 432‐552‐0800
Fax: 432‐552‐0800
Email: davidjr@burkroyalty.com

15. Trinity Operating (USG) LLC      Trade Claim          $221,113
John Garcia
601 Travis St., Suite 1900
Houston, TX 77002‐3253
Tel: 713‐374‐1508
Email: John.garcia@nexteraenergy.com

16. Hilcorp San Juan, LP             Trade Claim          $217,563
Michael D. Fertitta
1111 Travis Street
Houston, TX 77002
Tel: 713‐209‐2400
Fax: 713‐209‐2400
Email: mfertitta@hilcorp.com

17. Citation Oil & Gas Corp          Trade Claim          $211,977
Alice Zhang
14077 Cutten Road
Houston, TX 77069‐2212
Tel: 281‐891‐1000
Fax: 281‐891‐1000
Email: dcerny@cogc.com

18. Merit Energy Co                  Trade Claim          $209,275
Terry Gottberg
13727 Noel Road
Suite 1200, Tower 2
Dallas, TX 75240
Tel: 972‐701‐8377
Fax: 972‐701‐8377

19. Diamondback E&P LLC              Trade Claim          $200,643
Randall J. Holder
500 West Texas Ave, Suite 1200
Midland, TX 797701
Tel: 432‐221‐7456
Fax: 432‐221‐7456
Email: ap@diamondbackenergy.com

20. Basic Energy Services LP         Trade Claim          $193,632
Jake Havins
787 Valley CT
Grand Junction, CO 81505
Tel: 817‐334‐4100
Fax: 817‐334‐4100
Email: ar@basicenergyservices.com

21. Oxley Energy LLC                 Trade Claim          $177,690
Stephen M. Oxley
13130 Memorial Dr
Houston, TX 77079
Fax: 713‐467‐1168
Email: JDOMINGUEZ@OXLEYENERGY.COM

22. DJH Oil and Gas LLC              Trade Claim          $170,694
J Standefer
712 Main St #1900
Houston, TX 77002
Tel: 713‐228‐5911
Email: jstandefer@harrisoninterests.com

23. Q2 Artificial Lift Services      Trade Claim          $166,392
Doug Quinn
3611 Hwy 158
Midland, TX 79706
Tel: 432‐685‐2600
Fax: 432‐685‐2600
Email: dquinn@Q2als.com

24. Zatts Electric LLC               Trade Claim          $165,846
Diana Gutierrez
809 E 15th Street
Denver City, TX 79323
Tel: 806‐592‐7051
Fax: 806‐592‐7050
Email: zattselectic@zatts.us

25. Premier Equipment Corporation    Trade Claim          $164,756
13918 Airline Hwy
Baton Rouge, LA 70817
Tel: 225‐755‐2240
Fax: 225‐755‐2240
Email: info@premierequipla.com

26. BP America Production Company    Trade Claim          $161,758
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, TX 77079
Tel: 281‐366‐2000
Fax: 281‐366‐7584

27. Ranger Well Services, LLC        Trade Claim          $160,225
Pamela Benge
119 E Washington
Lovington, NM 88260
Tel: 575‐390‐2565

28. Southern Pine Electric Coop        Utility            $157,565
2134 South Boulevard
Brewton, AL 36426
Tel: 251‐867‐5415
Fax: 251‐867‐3925

29. A & A Tank Truck Co.             Trade Claim          $156,016
576 SW Highway 2
Wilburton, OK 74578
Tel: 918‐465‐3899
Fax: 918‐465‐3899

30. Gardner Pump & Supply Inc.       Trade Claim          $138,193
Larry Harper
3311 Industrial Drive
Hobbs, NM 88240
Tel: 575‐397‐4788
Fax: 575‐397‐4788
Email: gnrpmp30@hotmail.com

31. Cudd Pumping Services Inc.       Trade Claim          $138,044
2828 Technology Forest Blvd.
The Woodlands, TX 77381
Tel: 832‐295‐5555
Fax: 832‐295‐4555
Email: cpcinfo@cudd.com

32. C E Harmon Oil Inc.              Trade Claim          $135,151
5555 E 71st Street Ste 9300
Tulsa, OK 74136
Tel: 918‐663‐8515
Fax: 918‐663‐8515

33. White Star Petroleum II, LLC     Trade Claim          $127,215
Jeffrey J. Zanotti
301 NW 63rd Street, Suite 600
Oklahoma City, OK 73116
Tel: 405‐418‐8000
Fax: 405‐418‐8000
Email: kathy.raines@wstr.com

34. Coastal Chemical Co LLC          Trade Claim          $126,569
Robyn Hartwell
3520 Veterans Memorial Drive
Abbeville, LA 70510
Tel: 337‐898‐0001
Fax: 337‐898‐0001
Email: rhartwell@brenntag.com

35. Reef Services LLC                Trade Claim          $125,943
Larry Odonnell
7906 West Highway 80
Midland, TX 79706
Tel: 432‐560‐5600
Fax: 432‐560‐5633

36. Xcel Energy                        Utility            $122,858
Scott Wilensky
414 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612‐ 330‐5500
Fax: 612‐ 330‐5500
Email: customerservice@xcelenergy.com

37. Sheridan Production Company, LLC Trade Claim          $120,155
Cheryl S. Phillips
1360 Post Oak Blvd.
Suite 2500
Houston, TX 77056
Tel: 713‐548‐1000
Fax: 713‐548‐1000
Email: ar@sheridanproduction.com

38. Impact! Chem Technologics Inc.   Trade Claim          $119,336
10501 E Highway 80
Midland, TX 79706
Tel: 432‐458‐3500
Fax: 432‐458‐3500

39. Mercer Well Service/TSWS         Trade Claim          $117,247
616 W Main St
Whitesboro, TX 76273
Tel: 903‐564‐3730
Fax: 903‐564‐3206

40. Trinity Environmental SWD LLC    Trade Claim          $116,395
Whitney Kelly
13443 Highway 71 W, Suite 200
Bee Cave, TX 78738
Tel: 512‐ 582‐8050
Fax: 512‐ 582‐8050
Email: accounting@trinityenv.com

41. COG Operating LLC                Trade Claim          $111,058
Alyssa Duran
600 W. Illinois Avenue
Midland, TX 79701
Tel: 432‐221‐0340
Fax: 432‐683‐7441
Email: aduran@concho.com

42. Sunset Well Service Inc.         Trade Claim          $110,069
Rita A Savala
1507 N Dogwood Ave
Gardendale, TX 79758
Tel: 432‐561‐8600
Fax: 432‐561‐8600
Email: sunsetwellservice@yahoo.com

43. IHS Global Inc.                  Trade Claim          $109,998
Sari Granat
15 Inverness Way East
Englewood, CO 80112
Tel: 303‐790‐0600
Fax: 303‐397‐2599
Email: Sari.Granat@ihsmarkit.com

44. Enerflex Energy Systems Inc.     Trade Claim          $107,743
Greg Stewart
10815 TELGE ROAD
Houston, TX 77095
Tel: 281‐345‐9300
Fax: 281‐345‐7434
Email: info@enerflex.com

45. Markwest Energy                  Trade Claim          $102,989
1515 Araphoe Street
Tower 1, Suite 1600
Denver, CO 80202
Tel: 303‐925‐9200
Fax: 303‐290‐8769

46. DNOW LP                          Trade Claim           $96,459
Robert Workman
7402 N Eldridge Pkwy
Houston, TX 77041
Tel: 307‐ 856‐6533
Fax: 307‐ 856‐6533
Email: cp1@dnow.com; ap@dbnow.com

47. Enterprise Gas Processing LLC    Trade Claim           $93,380
2727 North West, Suite 700
Houston, TX 77008
Tel: 713‐880‐6500
Fax: 713‐381‐4365
Email: GOMgasprocessing@eprod.com

48. Archrock Services, L.P.          Trade Claim           $92,532
Jeff Eskridge
9807 Katy Freeway #100
Houston, TX 77024
Tel: 281‐ 836‐8155
Fax: 281‐ 836‐8155
Email: jeff.eskridge@archrock.com

49. Titanium                        A&D Post Close    Undetermined
Exploration Partners, LLC              True Up
Hamel Reinmiller
320 South Boston, Suite 1000
Tulsa, OK 74103
Tel: 214‐751‐8900
Fax: 214‐751‐8900
Email: reinmiller@titaniumep.com

50. Newfield Exploration            Trade Claim       Undetermined
4 Waterway Square Price, Suite 100
The Woodlands, TX 77380
Tel: 281‐210‐5100
Fax: 281‐210‐5101
Email: treasury.receipts@newfield.com


VORNADO REALTY: Fitch Affirms BB+ Preferred Stock Rating
--------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the ratings of Vornado Realty Trust,
Inc. (NYSE: VNO) and Vornado Realty, L.P., including the Long-Term
Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) at 'BBB'. The Rating Outlook is
Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Above-Average Portfolio Quality: VNO wholly-owns and has interests
in high-quality, primarily New York City office properties with
above peer-average occupancy rates and rents per square foot and
long-term leases to solid credit tenants. The company also owns and
operates a large street retail portfolio in key, supply constrained
Manhattan shopping corridors, such as upper Fifth Avenue and Times
Square. VNO generates 89% of its net operating income (NOI) from
its New York portfolio and 11% from two class A office properties,
theMART in Chicago and 555 California Street in San Francisco.

New York City's superior CRE market characteristics help mitigate
the market concentration risk. New York City is the largest and
arguably the most diverse office market in the U.S. New York City
CRE has above average contingent liquidity characteristics due to
superior institutional lender and investor demand. VNO's New
York-centric portfolio has some diversification by CRE property
type as retail is approximately 29% of NYC NOI (24% overall). In
addition, the company's interests in the MART in Chicago and 555
California Street in San Francisco provide some geographic
diversification.

Relatively Low Rent Risk Profile: VNO's rental income risk profile
is below the U.S. equity REIT average. Portfolio occupancy has
historically sustained in the midto high-90% range, with moderate
volatility through the cycle. The company's SSNOI has exceeded the
office REIT peer average with similar volatility. VNO has a long
(9.6 years for leases signed in 2018) weighted average lease
duration, which minimizes rollover risk. Lastly, the company's
tenant credit profile is strong, with minimal concentration. VNO's
top-10 tenants generally have healthy credit profiles and comprise
approximately 17.5% of annualized revenues.

Strong Contingent Liquidity: Fitch estimates VNO's net UA/UD at
approximately 5.3x, based on a direct capitalization approach of
its annualized fourth quarter 2018 (4Q18) unencumbered NOI, using a
7% stressed through-the-cycle cap rate. VNO's UA/UD is strong for
the 'BBB' rating, particularly given the institutional investor and
lender interest in Manhattan office and retail properties,
providing above-average contingent liquidity across core CRE
property types. VNO's high asset quality, limited use of unsecured
debt and strategy of placing higher loan-to-value ratios on
encumbered properties are key factors supporting the company's
strong UA/UD coverage.

220 Central Park South (CPS) Project Elevating Leverage: Fitch
expects VNO's leverage to sustain around the 7.0x level towards the
end of the one-to-two year rating outlook horizon, as the company
completes its for-saledevelopment project and uses condo sales
proceeds at 220 CPS to repay project level debt and to redeploy
profits into the company's next wave of longer term development
projects on its holdings in the Penn Plaza district. Non-recourse
construction loan financing for the company's 220 CPS residential
for-sale development is temporarily elevating VNO's leverage into
the mid-8.0x level in 2018. Fitch expects that continuing unit
sales at 220 CPS (the first $215 million was recognized in 4Q18 and
management has stated that 83% of the units were sold or under
contract at YE2018) should bring REIT leverage down to the mid-7x
level by the end of 2019, with further anticipation of deleveraging
sustaining around the 7.0x level occurring within the rating
horizon, thereafter.

VNO has reduced development risk through pre-leasing (and pre
sales) and the select use of JV equity and non-recourse
construction loans. The company also maintains excellent liquidity,
underpinned by $571 million of cash and near full availability
under its committed, $2.5 billion unsecured revolving credit
facilities as of Dec. 31, 2018. Vornado announced on March 26, 2019
that it increased one of its $1.25 billion credit facilities by
$250 million to $1.5 billion. The revolver's maturity was extended
to March 2024, including two six-month extension options, and the
interest rate on the line decreased by 10 basis points (bps) to
LIBOR + 90bps with the facility fee remaining at 20bps.

Complex Structure Reduces Visibility: VNO's business complexity
remains above average, notwithstanding the company's efforts to
streamline operations and extensive, quarterly supplemental
financial reporting. VNO does not provide earnings guidance, and
its active development platform and considerable use of joint
ventures challenges investors' ability to forecast cash flows and
liquidity requirements.

VNO has discussed its plans to sell over $1.0 billion of non-core
assets during the near-to-medium term. This includes the 1Q19
announced sales of VNO's ownership stake in shares of other
publicly traded REITs, Lexington Realty Trust (LXP) and Urban Edge
Properties (UE) as well as additional operating buildings. Property
sales will likely be staggered over the next couple years with
anticipated future development projects around Penn Plaza assets as
potential use for the proceeds.

Development Risk: VNO has an active development pipeline and a risk
profile that is consistent with its 'BBB' rating. The company's
unfunded commitments totalled 6.2% of gross assets at Dec. 31,
2018, although 220 Central Park South condo units are relatively
far along in the process of being monetized, and 5.0% after
adjusting for a $750 million term loan earmarked to help fund its
220 CPS condo development. The company has taken steps to manage
its development risk, including utilizing joint venture equity,
committed, non-recourse construction loans and pre-leasing.

PREFERRED STOCK NOTCHING

The two-notch differential between VNO's Long-Term IDR and its
preferred stock rating is consistent with Fitch's criteria for
corporate entities with an IDR of 'BBB'. Based on Fitch's criteria
report, "Treatment and Notching of Hybrids in Nonfinancial
Corporate and REIT Credit Analysis," dated Nov. 9, 2018, the
company's preferred stock is deeply subordinated and has loss
absorption elements that would likely result in poor recoveries in
the event of a corporate default.

STABLE OUTLOOK

The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch's expectation that VNO will
reduce leverage to around the 7.0x policy target level, primarily
with the proceeds from condo sales at 220 CPS and payoff of
additional debt.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

VNO owns and controls a concentrated portfolio comprised primarily
of high-quality office and street retail assets in Manhattan with
strong access to institutional mortgage debt and private equity
capital. The company is a large and established REIT, well known to
equity investors, but less active in the public unsecured bond
market due to its greater tolerance for, and strategic use of,
secured mortgage debt. VNO's high ratio of unencumbered assets to
unsecured debt and appropriate leverage policies also support the
rating.

The company's New York-focused portfolio has better contingent
liquidity from institutional lenders and investors than lower-rated
peer Mack-Cali Realty Corp. (BB/Stable). VNO has a large regional
presence in New York, as compared to the more diversified Boston
Properties (BBB+/Stable), which owns a high-quality portfolio of
class A office properties, located in the Boston, New York, San
Francisco, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. metros. However, the
persistent strength and economic diversity of Manhattan and its
high face rents help to mitigate the geographic concentration risk.
Comparably rated, SL Green Realty Corp (BBB/Stable) is the most
similar peer to VNO due to its predominant NYC office focus,
although SLG historically has had less of a development pipeline
and more of a secondary suburban concentration and also maintains a
debt and preferred equity investment portfolio.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  - Low-to-mid single digit SSNOI growth during the 2019 to 2021
forecast period, based on low to mid double digit GAAP rent spreads
and stable occupancy;

  - VNO uses retained cash from 220 CPS condo sales to repay debt.


  - Fitch assumes approximately $650 million of new development
starts in 2019 and 2020, most notably associated with the
redevelopment of the company's Penn Plaza assets, but does not
expect any material deliveries until 2021.

  - No incremental asset encumbrance from refinancing secured
mortgages

  - Approximately $500 million of proceeds from non-core asset
sales in 2019, including the 1Q19 sale of stock in Lexington
Property Trust (LXP) and Urban Edge Properties (UE).

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- Fitch's expectation of leverage sustaining below 6.0x;

  -- Fitch's expectation of fixed-charge coverage sustaining above
2.5x for several consecutive quarters.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- Fitch's expectation of net debt to recurring operating EBITDA
sustaining above 7.5x;

  -- Fitch's expectation of fixed-charge coverage sustaining below
1.8x;

  -- Fitch's expectation of a sustained liquidity coverage ratio
below 1.0x.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Strong Liquidity Coverage: VNO's sources of liquidity (cash,
availability under its revolving credit facility, retained cash
flow after dividends/distributions) cover its uses (pro rata debt
maturities, recurring capital expenditures, non-discretionary
development expenditures) by 1.4x on a pro forma basis for the
period Jan. 1, 2019 through Dec. 31, 2020. VNO had $95.8 million
(1.0% of total debt) of secured debt coming due in 2019 but
extended these maturities to 2024 in 1Q19. VNO also plans to prepay
its $400 million unsecured notes due January 2022 with proceeds
from their sales of their holdings of common stock of Lexington
Property Trust (LXP) and Urban Edge Properties (UE) that occurred
in 1Q19.

Fitch's liquidity analysis includes VNO refinancing upcoming
maturities within the mentioned periods. This reflects VNO's good
access to a variety of capital sources over time, which
meaningfully mitigates refinancing risk in Fitch's view. VNO's
liquidity coverage improves to 2.3x under a scenario where the
company refinances 80% of maturing pro rata secured debt.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, VNO has ample liquidity to complete the
roughly $1.06 billion of unfunded development expenses. VNO has
near full availability under its two $1.25 billion revolving credit
facilities, except for $80 million that was drawn as of YE2018.
During 4Q18, the company repaid $213 million of its $950 million
loan on its 220 CPS condo development. Historically, VNO has more
frequently accessed the mortgage market than the unsecured bond
market as a source of funds. As of Dec. 31, 2018, 83% of the
company's consolidated debt was secured.

On March 26, 2019, VNO announced that it has amended its unsecured
credit facility such to upsize one of its two $1.25 billion
unsecured revolving credit facilities by $250 million (combined
total capacity of $2.75 billion going forward) with 10bps of
improved pricing (now LIBOR +90bps). The amended credit facility
now matures in March 2024 , including two six month extension
options.

Vornado Realty, LP

  - LT IDR; Affirmed at BBB

  - Senior unsecured Rating; Affirmed at LT BBB
  
Vornado Realty Trust

  - LT IDR; Affirmed at BBB

  - Preferred; Affirmed at LT BB+


WABASH VALLEY: Crossroads Buying Ringgold Property for $260K
------------------------------------------------------------
Wabash Valley Wood Protection, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Tennessee to authorize the sale of the
real property located at 7638 Nashville Street, Ringgold, Georgia,
Catoosa County Map # R0060-076, to Crossroads Church of Chattanooga
for $260,000.

The parties have executed their Sales Contract for the sale of the
Property free and clear of the interests of any lien holders.  Said
lien, if any, will attach to the proceeds of the sale in accordance
with the law of priority of liens.  All net proceeds of the sale
shall be remitted to the Debtor.  The closing shall be upon
approval of the sale by the Court.  The earnest money is $5,000.

A hearing on the Motion is set for April 4, 2019, at 11:00 a.m.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Operation_Simulation_106_Sales.pdf

             About Operation Simulation Associates

Founded in 1983, Operation Simulation Associates provides software
and services for the electric power industry with clients in the
USA and worldwide.  OSA is the developer of the PowrSym family of
electric power system generation, transmission, and fuel supply
models.

Wabash Valley Wood Protection, Inc., is an Indiana corporation
founded in 2017 for the purpose of purchasing and operating the
Vincennes, Indiana pressure treating plant and distribution yard
formerly operated as a division of Babb lumber Company.  With the
acquisition, Wabash is adding a new product line of UL fire rated
lumber and plywood.

Operation Simulation Associates, based in Ringgold, Georgia, and
its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Lead
Case No. 18-14808) on Oct. 19, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Roger A. Babb, president, Operation
Simulation Associates estimated $500,000 to $1 million in assets
and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities; and Wabash Valley
Wood Protection, Inc., estimated $1 million to $10 million in
assets and liabilities.

The Hon. Shelley D. Rucker is the case judge.

David J. Fulton, Esq., at Scarborough & Fulton, serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtors.


WILLOWOOD AZOXYSTROBIN: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Willowood Azoxystrobin, LLC
        1350 17th Street, Ste. 206
        Denver, CO 80202

Business Description: Willowood Azoxystrobin, LLC is a
                      Colorado-based company that develops,
                      formulates, and markets generic crop
                      protection products for the U.S. agriculture

                      industry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: March 28, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Colorado (Denver)

Case No.: 19-12371

Judge: Hon. Thomas B. McNamara

Debtor's Counsel: Michael J. Pankow, Esq.
                  BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP
                  410 17th St., 22nd Fl.
                  Denver, CO 80202
                  Tel: 303-223-1100
                  Fax: 303-223-1111
                  Email: mpankow@bhfs.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Thomas M. Kim, chief restructuring
officer.

A copy of the Debtor's list of two unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob19-12371_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob19-12371.pdf

Pending bankruptcy cases filed by affiliates:

   Debtor                    Petition Date       Case No.
   ------                    -------------       --------
Greenfields Holdings, LLC      2/27/19           19-11327
Greenfields Marketing Ltd.     2/27/19           19-11331
Rightline LLC                  2/27/19           19-11324
Willowood USA Holdings, LLC    2/15/19           19-11079
Willowood USA, LLC             2/27/19           19-11320   
Willowood, LLC                 2/27/19           19-11322


WILSON LAND: Rossers Buying Concord Property for $60K
-----------------------------------------------------
Wilson Land Properties, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Ohio to authorize the sale of interest in the
real property located at 1490 Viceroy St, Concord, Ohio, a fully
improved building lot, Permanent Parcel No. 08-A-012-J-00-061-0, to
Cynthia S. Rosser and Bradley S. Rosser for $60,000 on the terms
and conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase.

The property is a fully improved building lot.  There are
encumbrances on the property as indicated from the Commitment but
it is in the best interest of the estate that the property be sold
free and clear of their interests.   

In order to provide adequate protection of any interests of those
parties, the Buyer will deposit the funds necessary to complete the
transaction with the escrow agent as set forth in Exhibit A, the
Debtor will instruct the escrow agent to disperse from the sale
proceeds an amount sufficient to pay real estate taxes, and amounts
owed to Tax Ease Ohio in full and then the balance to RBS Citizens
NA.

The parties believe the sale price represents fair market value for
the property.

A copy of the Offer and the Commitment attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Wilson_Land_120_Sales.pdf

                   About Wilson Land Properties

Based in Mentor, Ohio, Wilson Land Properties, LLC, is the owner of
51 real estate properties having a total estimated value of $4.54
million.  Wilson Land Properties, based in Mentor, OH, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No. 18-10514) on Jan.
31, 2018.  In the petition signed by Richard M Osborne, managing
member, the Debtor disclosed $4.54 million in assets and $43.23
million in liabilities.  The Hon. Arthur I. Harris oversees the
case.  Glenn E. Forbes, Esq., at Forbes Law LLC, serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


WINDSOR MARKETING: New Plan Incorporates Settlement with Committee
------------------------------------------------------------------
Windsor Marketing Group, Inc. filed a first amended disclosure
statement in connection with its first amended chapter 11 plan
dated March 22, 2019.

This latest filing incorporates the settlement with the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors, the Debtors and insiders of the
Debtor affiliated with Kevin Armata.

The plan also modifies the treatment of several classes of claims
including the Secured Claim of Connecticut Department of Economic
and Community Development in Class 2 and the allowed unsecured
claims in Class 6.

The Secured Claim of the DECD will be reduced from $1,051,326.64
and Allowed in the amount of $269,651.02, and the balance of the
Secured Claim will be waived, disallowed and expunged as against
the Debtor and Armata as of the Confirmation Date, provided,
however, that such waiver, release and discharge is conditioned
upon WMG not relocating its business outside the State of
Connecticut, as provided by §2.10 (G) of the Assistance Agreement
between DECD and WMG, fully executed as of March 20, 2009. In the
event this condition does not remain satisfied, the forgiveness
credit in the amount of $1,000,000 will automatically be added to
the Allowed Secured Claim of DECD, together with a one-time penalty
charge of 7.5%, all of which shall be immediately due and payable
upon relocation.

The Debtor presently anticipates that after amending its Schedules
and conforming deficiency claims from Secured Claims, that Allowed
Non-Priority Unsecured Claims will total approximately $12 million.
If Peoples waives its Allowed Unsecured Claims, that total amount
of Allowed Unsecured Claims may be reduced by approximately 25%,
but at this time Peoples has not agreed to this waiver. Holders of
Class 6 Claims will receive the following: Holders of Allowed
Unsecured Claims in Class 6 will receive their Pro Rata share of
$53,571.42 paid each quarter for a total of 28 quarters (i.e. the
28 quarters equates to a period of seven years) commencing six
months after the Effective Date of the Plan. The Reorganized Debtor
reserves the right to prepay any of these payments to each and/or
all of these creditors in this class under the Plan without
penalty. The Reorganized Debtor reserves the right to review and if
it deems appropriate, to object, contest or otherwise challenge any
claim that has not previously been allowed by Bankruptcy Court
Order in the time frame set forth herein and subject to the rights
of the Creditor Representative. The deadline to file such objection
or challenge is May 15, 2019. The total payout to holders of
Allowed Unsecured Claims in Class 6 will not exceed $1,500,000 in
the aggregate and there will be no interest that accrues on any
distributions to Class 6 holders.

A copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement dated March 22,
2019 is available at http://tinyurl.com/yyakyua9from
Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

              About Windsor Marketing Group

Headquartered in Suffield, Connecticut, Windsor Marketing Group,
Inc. -- https://windsormarketing.com/ -- is a privately held
company that develops and implements innovative in-store marketing
programs for more than 3,000 clients, including some of the
nation's top retailers.  Founded in 1976, Windsor Marketing helps
retailers make their stores easier to shop, reduce turnaround times
and lower production and fulfillment costs.

Windsor Marketing Group filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Conn. Case No. 18-20022) on Jan. 8, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Kevin F. Armata, president, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities at $10 million to $50 million.

The Debtor's counsel is James Berman, Esq., at Zeisler & Zeisler,
P.C.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 on Jan. 22, 2018, appointed three
creditors to serve on an official committee of unsecured creditors.
Lowenstein Sandler LLP, serves as counsel to the Committee; and
Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C., as its Connecticut counsel.


WPX ENERGY: S&P Affirms 'BB-' ICR, Unsec. Debt Rating
-----------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB-' issuer credit rating on WPX
Energy Inc., a Tulsa, Okla.-based crude oil and natural gas
exploration and production (E&P) company.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'BB-' issue-level rating on the
company's unsecured debt and revised its recovery rating on the
debt to '3' from '4'. The '3' recovery rating indicates S&P's
expectation for meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 65%)
recovery to creditors in the event of a payment default.

The affirmation reflects S&P's expectation that WPX will continue
to deliver strong production growth in 2019 under a more moderate
capital spending plan, which will enable it to maintain adequate
financial measures for the current rating despite the rating
agency's lower oil price assumption of $50 per barrel (bbl) in both
2019 and 2020 (compared with close to $65/bbl in 2018). S&P expects
the company's FFO to debt to average in the 35%-40% range over the
next two years and anticipates that its debt to EBITDA will average
around 2.0x-2.2x.

The stable outlook on WPX Energy reflects S&P's expectation that
the company will grow production and maintain a modest financial
policy, while maintaining FFO to debt of comfortably above 30% over
the next 12-24 months.

"We could lower our ratings on WPX if its FFO to debt falls below
20% for a sustained period with no clear path for improvement. This
would most likely occur because of a decline in crude oil prices
relative to our current assumptions or if the company's production
falls short of our current growth expectations without an
offsetting cut in its capital spending," S&P said.

"We could raise our rating on WPX if it increases its reserves and
production to levels more commensurate with higher-rated peers or
if its FFO to debt increases well above 45% on a sustained basis.
This would most likely occur if the company increases its
production and reserves beyond our current expectations through
further drilling efficiencies or bolt-on acquisitions or if crude
oil prices improve beyond our current expectations and lead to
stronger leverage metrics," the rating agency said.


YWFM LLC: Amends Plan to Modify Treatment of KSI's Secured Claim
----------------------------------------------------------------
YWFM, LLC, d/b/a Brian's Tire and Service filed a small business
amended disclosure statement describing its proposed amended
chapter 11 plan dated March 26, 2019.

This latest filing modifies the treatment of the secured claim of
Kapitus Servicing, Inc. f/k/a Colonial Funding Network, Inc. as
servicer for Arca Funding, LLC.

The secured claim of Kapitus Servicing, Inc. as servicer for Arca
Funding, LLC will now be paid in accordance with the Agreed Final
Order Granting, in part, and Denying, in Part, Motion to Prohibit
Use of Cash Collateral and Prohibit the Debtor's Use of Non-estate
Property entered on March 14, 2019. The terms of the Agreed Order
will control.

The initial plan proposed to pay Kapitus $1,500 monthly at 8%
interest beginning 30 days after the effective date until paid in
full.

A copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated March 26, 2019 is
available at http://tinyurl.com/y5h53xe5from Pacermonitor.com at
no charge.

                      About YWFM, LLC

YWFM LLC, d/b/a Brian's Tire and Service, filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No. 18-40469) on Aug.
31, 2018.  In the petition signed by its sole member, Brian
Lombardino, the Debtor estimated less than $50,000 in assets and
less than $500,000 in liabilities.  The Debtor is represented by
Byron Wright III, Esq., at Bruner Wright, P.A.  The Debtor tapped
Dyer & Smith, LLC, as accountant.  No official committee of
unsecured creditors has been appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


Z GALLERIE: May 1 Hearing on Bid to Approve Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------------------
Z Gallerie, LLC, et al., filed a motion asking the Bankruptcy Court
to (i) approve the adequacy of the disclosure statement explaining
their joint plan of reorganization; (ii) approve the solicitation
and notice procedures with respect to confirmation of the Plan;
(iii) approve the forms of ballots and notices in connection
therewith; and (iv) scheduling certain dates with respect to the
confirmation of the Plan.

The Debtors propose the following confirmation schedule:

   -- Voting Deadline. June 4, 2019

   -- Plan Objection Deadline. June 4, 2019

   -- Plan Objection Response Deadline. June 7, 2019

   -- Deadline to File the Confirmation Brief. June 7, 2019

   -- Deadline to File Voting Report. June 7, 2019

   -- Confirmation Hearing Date. June 11, 2019

A hearing to consider the relief requested in the Motion will be
held on May 1, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (prevailing Eastern Time) before
the Honorable Laurie Selber Silverstein, United States Bankruptcy
Judge for the District of Delaware, 824 N. Market Street, Courtroom
2, 6th Floor, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.

Objections must be filed and served on or before April 24, 2019 at
4:00 p.m. (prevailing Eastern Time).

                     About Z Gallerie

Z Gallerie, LLC -- https://www.zgallerie.com/ -- is a retailer of
home decor products.  It operates 76 retail stores in 28 states as
of the petition date.  

Z Gallerie and its affiliate Z Gallerie Holding Company, LLC,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-10488) on March 11, 2019.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors had estimated assets of $100
million to $500 million and liabilities of $100 million to $500
million.  

The Debtors tapped Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP and Kirkland
& Ellis as legal counsel; Lazard Middle Market LLC as investment
banker; Berkeley Research Group, LLC as restructuring advisor; and
Stretto as claims and noticing agent.


[^] Large Companies with Insolvent Balance Sheet
------------------------------------------------
                                                Total
                                               Share-      Total
                                   Total     Holders'    Working
                                  Assets       Equity    Capital
  Company         Ticker            ($MM)        ($MM)      ($MM)
  -------         ------          ------     --------    -------
ABBVIE INC        ABBV US       59,352.0     (8,446.0)    (294.0)
ABBVIE INC        ABBV AV       59,352.0     (8,446.0)    (294.0)
ABBVIE INC        4AB TE        59,352.0     (8,446.0)    (294.0)
ABBVIE INC        ABBVUSD EU    59,352.0     (8,446.0)    (294.0)
ABBVIE INC        ABBVEUR EU    59,352.0     (8,446.0)    (294.0)
ABBVIE INC        4AB GZ        59,352.0     (8,446.0)    (294.0)
ABBVIE INC        4AB TH        59,352.0     (8,446.0)    (294.0)
ABBVIE INC        4AB QT        59,352.0     (8,446.0)    (294.0)
ABBVIE INC        4AB GR        59,352.0     (8,446.0)    (294.0)
ABBVIE INC        ABBV* MM      59,352.0     (8,446.0)    (294.0)
ABBVIE INC-BDR    ABBV34 BZ     59,352.0     (8,446.0)    (294.0)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ABT CN           90.2        (55.3)     (33.2)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  OU1 GR            90.2        (55.3)     (33.2)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ALSWF US          90.2        (55.3)     (33.2)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ABT2EUR EU        90.2        (55.3)     (33.2)
AGENUS INC        AGENUSD EU       136.4       (172.5)       6.7
AIMIA INC         AIM CN         3,507.0       (173.5)  (1,247.5)
AMER RESTAUR-LP   ICTPU US          33.5         (4.0)      (6.2)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL US        60,580.0       (169.0)  (9,459.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G GR        60,580.0       (169.0)  (9,459.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL* MM       60,580.0       (169.0)  (9,459.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL1USD EU    60,580.0       (169.0)  (9,459.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G TH        60,580.0       (169.0)  (9,459.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G GZ        60,580.0       (169.0)  (9,459.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL11EUR EU   60,580.0       (169.0)  (9,459.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL AV        60,580.0       (169.0)  (9,459.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL TE        60,580.0       (169.0)  (9,459.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G SW        60,580.0       (169.0)  (9,459.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL1CHF EU    60,580.0       (169.0)  (9,459.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G QT        60,580.0       (169.0)  (9,459.0)
ATLATSA RESOURCE  ATL SJ           144.0       (238.4)       6.6
AUTODESK INC      ADSK US        4,729.2       (210.9)    (681.2)
AUTODESK INC      AUD TH         4,729.2       (210.9)    (681.2)
AUTODESK INC      AUD GR         4,729.2       (210.9)    (681.2)
AUTODESK INC      ADSKEUR EU     4,729.2       (210.9)    (681.2)
AUTODESK INC      ADSKUSD EU     4,729.2       (210.9)    (681.2)
AUTODESK INC      ADSK TE        4,729.2       (210.9)    (681.2)
AUTODESK INC      ADSK SW        4,729.2       (210.9)    (681.2)
AUTODESK INC      AUD GZ         4,729.2       (210.9)    (681.2)
AUTODESK INC      ADSK AV        4,729.2       (210.9)    (681.2)
AUTODESK INC      ADSK* MM       4,729.2       (210.9)    (681.2)
AUTODESK INC      AUD QT         4,729.2       (210.9)    (681.2)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 GR         9,745.1     (1,594.4)    (337.2)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 TH         9,745.1     (1,594.4)    (337.2)
AUTOZONE INC      AZOUSD EU      9,745.1     (1,594.4)    (337.2)
AUTOZONE INC      AZO US         9,745.1     (1,594.4)    (337.2)
AUTOZONE INC      AZOEUR EU      9,745.1     (1,594.4)    (337.2)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 QT         9,745.1     (1,594.4)    (337.2)
AVEDRO INC        AVDR US           25.9         (5.2)      12.2
AVEDRO INC        219 GR            25.9         (5.2)      12.2
AVEDRO INC        219 GZ            25.9         (5.2)      12.2
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVD GR           265.8       (166.7)       8.9
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVID US          265.8       (166.7)       8.9
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BNFTEUR EU       313.9        (10.2)     150.2
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BNFT US          313.9        (10.2)     150.2
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BTF GR           313.9        (10.2)     150.2
BIO-EN HOLDINGS   BENH US            0.0         (0.0)      (0.0)
BJ'S WHOLESALE C  BJ US          3,239.3       (202.1)    (240.5)
BJ'S WHOLESALE C  8BJ GR         3,239.3       (202.1)    (240.5)
BJ'S WHOLESALE C  8BJ TH         3,239.3       (202.1)    (240.5)
BJ'S WHOLESALE C  8BJ QT         3,239.3       (202.1)    (240.5)
BLUE BIRD CORP    BLBD US          297.7        (79.7)       8.3
BLUELINX HOLDING  BXC US           959.9        (14.7)     403.1
BOMBARDIER INC-B  BBDBN MM      24,958.0     (4,014.0)     (44.0)
BRINKER INTL      BKJ GR         1,294.8       (855.2)    (292.0)
BRINKER INTL      EAT US         1,294.8       (855.2)    (292.0)
BRINKER INTL      BKJ QT         1,294.8       (855.2)    (292.0)
BRINKER INTL      EAT2EUR EU     1,294.8       (855.2)    (292.0)
BROOKFIELD REAL   BRE CN            95.7        (26.7)       6.7
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  DOOO US        3,077.2       (322.8)    (192.6)
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  DOO CN         3,077.2       (322.8)    (192.6)
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  B15A GR        3,077.2       (322.8)    (192.6)
CADIZ INC         CDZI US           69.3        (86.2)       8.9
CADIZ INC         2ZC GR            69.3        (86.2)       8.9
CANNABIS STRAT-A  CSA/A CN         136.7        (44.9)      (0.5)
CANNABIS STRAT-A  CBAQF US         136.7        (44.9)      (0.5)
CASELLA WASTE     CWST US          732.4        (15.8)     (14.4)
CASELLA WASTE     WA3 GR           732.4        (15.8)     (14.4)
CASELLA WASTE     CWSTUSD EU       732.4        (15.8)     (14.4)
CASELLA WASTE     WA3 TH           732.4        (15.8)     (14.4)
CASELLA WASTE     CWSTEUR EU       732.4        (15.8)     (14.4)
CATASYS INC       CATS US            6.3         (9.0)      (2.2)
CDK GLOBAL INC    CDK US         3,017.1       (500.1)      56.4
CDK GLOBAL INC    C2G QT         3,017.1       (500.1)      56.4
CDK GLOBAL INC    CDKUSD EU      3,017.1       (500.1)      56.4
CDK GLOBAL INC    C2G TH         3,017.1       (500.1)      56.4
CDK GLOBAL INC    CDKEUR EU      3,017.1       (500.1)      56.4
CDK GLOBAL INC    C2G GR         3,017.1       (500.1)      56.4
CHINA WUYI MOUNT  WUYI US            0.0         (0.0)      (0.0)
CHOICE HOTELS     CZH GR         1,138.4       (183.8)     (74.7)
CHOICE HOTELS     CHH US         1,138.4       (183.8)     (74.7)
CINCINNATI BELL   CBBEUR EU      2,730.2        (75.0)     (95.8)
CINCINNATI BELL   CBB US         2,730.2        (75.0)     (95.8)
CINCINNATI BELL   CIB1 GR        2,730.2        (75.0)     (95.8)
CLEAR CHANNEL-A   CCO US         4,522.0     (2,101.7)     286.0
CLEAR CHANNEL-A   C7C GR         4,522.0     (2,101.7)     286.0
COGENT COMMUNICA  OGM1 GR          739.8       (149.0)     275.0
COGENT COMMUNICA  CCOI US          739.8       (149.0)     275.0
COHERUS BIOSCIEN  CHRSUSD EU        99.5        (38.6)      51.2
COHERUS BIOSCIEN  8C5 TH            99.5        (38.6)      51.2
COHERUS BIOSCIEN  CHRSEUR EU        99.5        (38.6)      51.2
COHERUS BIOSCIEN  8C5 QT            99.5        (38.6)      51.2
COHERUS BIOSCIEN  CHRS US           99.5        (38.6)      51.2
COHERUS BIOSCIEN  8C5 GR            99.5        (38.6)      51.2
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CG5 GR        15,859.0       (959.0)   1,157.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CYH US        15,859.0       (959.0)   1,157.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CYH1USD EU    15,859.0       (959.0)   1,157.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CG5 TH        15,859.0       (959.0)   1,157.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CG5 QT        15,859.0       (959.0)   1,157.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CYH1EUR EU    15,859.0       (959.0)   1,157.0
CRESCO LABS INC   CL CN              0.1         (0.1)      (0.1)
CRESCO LABS INC   CRLBF US           0.1         (0.1)      (0.1)
CURO GROUP HOLDI  CGE GR           919.6        (19.1)     579.2
CURO GROUP HOLDI  CUROEUR EU       919.6        (19.1)     579.2
CURO GROUP HOLDI  CURO US          919.6        (19.1)     579.2
DELEK LOGISTICS   DKL US           624.6       (134.8)      (3.9)
DELEK LOGISTICS   D6L GR           624.6       (134.8)      (3.9)
DENNY'S CORP      DENN US          335.3       (133.3)     (47.1)
DENNY'S CORP      DE8 GR           335.3       (133.3)     (47.1)
DENNY'S CORP      DENNEUR EU       335.3       (133.3)     (47.1)
DERMIRA           DERMEUR EU       344.3         (9.0)     296.9
DERMIRA           19D GR           344.3         (9.0)     296.9
DERMIRA           DERM US          344.3         (9.0)     296.9
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DBD GR         4,311.9       (159.6)     635.0
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DBD US         4,311.9       (159.6)     635.0
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DBD LI         4,311.9       (159.6)     635.0
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DBDEUR EU      4,311.9       (159.6)     635.0
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DBDUSD EU      4,311.9       (159.6)     635.0
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DLD TH         4,311.9       (159.6)     635.0
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DLD QT         4,311.9       (159.6)     635.0
DINE BRANDS GLOB  DIN US         1,774.7       (202.3)      66.0
DINE BRANDS GLOB  IHP GR         1,774.7       (202.3)      66.0
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 GR         2,177.9       (234.1)     421.1
DOLLARAMA INC     DLMAF US       2,177.9       (234.1)     421.1
DOLLARAMA INC     DOL CN         2,177.9       (234.1)     421.1
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 GZ         2,177.9       (234.1)     421.1
DOLLARAMA INC     DOLEUR EU      2,177.9       (234.1)     421.1
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 QT         2,177.9       (234.1)     421.1
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 TH         2,177.9       (234.1)     421.1
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV TH           907.4     (3,039.9)     187.2
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV GR           907.4     (3,039.9)     187.2
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZ US           907.4     (3,039.9)     187.2
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZEUR EU        907.4     (3,039.9)     187.2
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZUSD EU        907.4     (3,039.9)     187.2
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV QT           907.4     (3,039.9)     187.2
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB TH         3,456.6     (1,410.5)     273.9
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  DNKN US        3,456.6     (1,410.5)     273.9
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB GR         3,456.6     (1,410.5)     273.9
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB GZ         3,456.6     (1,410.5)     273.9
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB QT         3,456.6     (1,410.5)     273.9
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  DNKNEUR EU     3,456.6     (1,410.5)     273.9
EGAIN CORP        EGAN US           48.2         (1.3)     (12.2)
EGAIN CORP        EGCA GR           48.2         (1.3)     (12.2)
EGAIN CORP        EGANEUR EU        48.2         (1.3)     (12.2)
EMISPHERE TECH    EMIS US            5.2       (155.3)      (1.4)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  G2C TH         1,548.3       (108.9)      17.3
EVERI HOLDINGS I  G2C GR         1,548.3       (108.9)      17.3
EVERI HOLDINGS I  EVRI US        1,548.3       (108.9)      17.3
EVERI HOLDINGS I  EVRIUSD EU     1,548.3       (108.9)      17.3
EVERI HOLDINGS I  EVRIEUR EU     1,548.3       (108.9)      17.3
EXELA TECHNOLOGI  XELA US        1,639.8       (181.0)     (76.8)
FRONTDOOR IN      FTDR US        1,041.0       (344.0)     (15.0)
FRONTDOOR IN      3I5 GR         1,041.0       (344.0)     (15.0)
GNC HOLDINGS INC  GNC* MM        1,527.8        (15.5)     376.5
GOGO INC          GOGO US        1,265.1       (268.8)     285.8
GOGO INC          G0G TH         1,265.1       (268.8)     285.8
GOGO INC          GOGOUSD EU     1,265.1       (268.8)     285.8
GOGO INC          GOGOEUR EU     1,265.1       (268.8)     285.8
GOGO INC          G0G GR         1,265.1       (268.8)     285.8
GOGO INC          G0G QT         1,265.1       (268.8)     285.8
GOOSEHEAD INSU-A  GSHD US           34.8        (25.2)       -
GOOSEHEAD INSU-A  2OX GR            34.8        (25.2)       -
GOOSEHEAD INSU-A  GSHDEUR EU        34.8        (25.2)       -
GRAFTECH INTERNA  EAF US         1,505.5     (1,076.8)     310.9
GRAFTECH INTERNA  G6G GR         1,505.5     (1,076.8)     310.9
GRAFTECH INTERNA  G6G TH         1,505.5     (1,076.8)     310.9
GRAFTECH INTERNA  EAFEUR EU      1,505.5     (1,076.8)     310.9
GRAFTECH INTERNA  G6G QT         1,505.5     (1,076.8)     310.9
GRAFTECH INTERNA  EAFUSD EU      1,505.5     (1,076.8)     310.9
GREEN PLAINS PAR  GPP US            81.1        (72.5)       8.4
GREEN PLAINS PAR  8GP GR            81.1        (72.5)       8.4
GREENSKY INC-A    GSKY US          802.9        (34.8)     323.5
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB TH         2,568.8       (213.6)     647.0
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB US         2,568.8       (213.6)     647.0
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB GR         2,568.8       (213.6)     647.0
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB QT         2,568.8       (213.6)     647.0
H&R BLOCK INC     HRBEUR EU      2,568.8       (213.6)     647.0
HANGER INC        HNGR US          703.0        (21.9)     154.6
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH TH        39,207.0     (2,918.0)   2,644.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCA US        39,207.0     (2,918.0)   2,644.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH GR        39,207.0     (2,918.0)   2,644.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCAUSD EU     39,207.0     (2,918.0)   2,644.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCA* MM       39,207.0     (2,918.0)   2,644.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH QT        39,207.0     (2,918.0)   2,644.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCAEUR EU     39,207.0     (2,918.0)   2,644.0
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HLF US         2,789.8       (723.4)     216.2
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HOO GR         2,789.8       (723.4)     216.2
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HLFUSD EU      2,789.8       (723.4)     216.2
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HOO GZ         2,789.8       (723.4)     216.2
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HLFEUR EU      2,789.8       (723.4)     216.2
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HOO QT         2,789.8       (723.4)     216.2
HOME DEPOT - BDR  HOME34 BZ     44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT INC    HD TE         44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT INC    HDI TH        44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT INC    HDI GR        44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT INC    HD US         44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT INC    HD* MM        44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT INC    HD SW         44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT INC    HDI GZ        44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT INC    HD AV         44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT INC    HDUSD SW      44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT INC    HDEUR EU      44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT INC    HDI QT        44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT INC    HDCHF EU      44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT INC    HDUSD EU      44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT INC    HD CI         44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HOME DEPOT-CED    HD AR         44,003.0     (1,878.0)   1,813.0
HP COMPANY-BDR    HPQB34 BZ     32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
HP INC            HPQ TE        32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
HP INC            HPQ* MM       32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
HP INC            7HP GR        32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
HP INC            HPQ US        32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
HP INC            7HP TH        32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
HP INC            HPQ SW        32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
HP INC            HPQEUR EU     32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
HP INC            7HP GZ        32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
HP INC            HPQUSD SW     32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
HP INC            HWP QT        32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
HP INC            HPQCHF EU     32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
HP INC            HPQUSD EU     32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
HP INC            HPQ AV        32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
HP INC            HPQ CI        32,490.0     (1,837.0)  (5,263.0)
IDEXX LABS        IDXX US        1,537.3         (9.2)    (116.3)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 GR         1,537.3         (9.2)    (116.3)
IDEXX LABS        IDXX TE        1,537.3         (9.2)    (116.3)
IDEXX LABS        IDXX AV        1,537.3         (9.2)    (116.3)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 GZ         1,537.3         (9.2)    (116.3)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 QT         1,537.3         (9.2)    (116.3)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 TH         1,537.3         (9.2)    (116.3)
INSEEGO CORP      INO QT           162.3        (36.5)      30.7
INSEEGO CORP      INO TH           162.3        (36.5)      30.7
INSEEGO CORP      INSGUSD EU       162.3        (36.5)      30.7
INSEEGO CORP      INSG US          162.3        (36.5)      30.7
INSEEGO CORP      INO GR           162.3        (36.5)      30.7
INSEEGO CORP      INSGEUR EU       162.3        (36.5)      30.7
INSYS THERAPEUTI  INSYUSD EU       192.5        (43.1)      19.4
INSYS THERAPEUTI  NPR1 TH          192.5        (43.1)      19.4
INSYS THERAPEUTI  NPR1 SW          192.5        (43.1)      19.4
INSYS THERAPEUTI  NPR1 GR          192.5        (43.1)      19.4
INSYS THERAPEUTI  INSYEUR EU       192.5        (43.1)      19.4
INSYS THERAPEUTI  INSY US          192.5        (43.1)      19.4
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  I76 TH           332.0       (196.4)     146.9
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  IRWD US          332.0       (196.4)     146.9
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  I76 GR           332.0       (196.4)     146.9
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  IRWDUSD EU       332.0       (196.4)     146.9
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  IRWDEUR EU       332.0       (196.4)     146.9
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  I76 QT           332.0       (196.4)     146.9
ISRAMCO INC       ISRL US          111.6         (7.4)      (3.2)
ISRAMCO INC       IRM GR           111.6         (7.4)      (3.2)
ISRAMCO INC       ISRLEUR EU       111.6         (7.4)      (3.2)
JACK IN THE BOX   JACK US          828.9       (607.3)     (91.1)
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX GR           828.9       (607.3)     (91.1)
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX GZ           828.9       (607.3)     (91.1)
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX QT           828.9       (607.3)     (91.1)
JACK IN THE BOX   JACK1EUR EU      828.9       (607.3)     (91.1)
L BRANDS INC      LTD GR         8,090.0       (865.0)   1,274.0
L BRANDS INC      LB US          8,090.0       (865.0)   1,274.0
L BRANDS INC      LTD TH         8,090.0       (865.0)   1,274.0
L BRANDS INC      LBUSD EU       8,090.0       (865.0)   1,274.0
L BRANDS INC      LBEUR EU       8,090.0       (865.0)   1,274.0
L BRANDS INC      LB* MM         8,090.0       (865.0)   1,274.0
L BRANDS INC      LTD QT         8,090.0       (865.0)   1,274.0
L BRANDS INC-BDR  LBRN34 BZ      8,090.0       (865.0)   1,274.0
LAMB WESTON       LW-WUSD EU     3,052.5       (167.1)     437.8
LAMB WESTON       0L5 GR         3,052.5       (167.1)     437.8
LAMB WESTON       LW-WEUR EU     3,052.5       (167.1)     437.8
LAMB WESTON       0L5 TH         3,052.5       (167.1)     437.8
LAMB WESTON       0L5 QT         3,052.5       (167.1)     437.8
LAMB WESTON       LW US          3,052.5       (167.1)     437.8
LEE ENTERPRISES   LEE US           586.9        (26.1)       9.2
LENNOX INTL INC   LII US         1,817.2       (149.6)      80.9
LENNOX INTL INC   LXI TH         1,817.2       (149.6)      80.9
LENNOX INTL INC   LII1USD EU     1,817.2       (149.6)      80.9
LENNOX INTL INC   LII* MM        1,817.2       (149.6)      80.9
LENNOX INTL INC   LII1EUR EU     1,817.2       (149.6)      80.9
LENNOX INTL INC   LXI GR         1,817.2       (149.6)      80.9
LEXICON PHARMACE  LXRXUSD EU       284.1        (26.4)     136.6
LEXICON PHARMACE  LX31 GR          284.1        (26.4)     136.6
LEXICON PHARMACE  LXRX US          284.1        (26.4)     136.6
LEXICON PHARMACE  LX31 QT          284.1        (26.4)     136.6
LEXICON PHARMACE  LXRXEUR EU       284.1        (26.4)     136.6
LIGHTSPEED POS I  LSPD CN           61.2        (33.5)     (10.4)
MCDONALDS - BDR   MCDC34 BZ     32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD SW        32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD US        32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO GR        32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD* MM       32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD TE        32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO TH        32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDEUR EU     32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO GZ        32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD AV        32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDUSD SW     32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO QT        32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDCHF EU     32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDUSD EU     32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD CI        32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MCDONALDS-CEDEAR  MCD AR        32,811.2     (6,258.4)   1,079.7
MEDICINES COMP    MDCO US          841.7        (22.3)     236.4
MEDICINES COMP    MZN GR           841.7        (22.3)     236.4
MEDICINES COMP    MZN TH           841.7        (22.3)     236.4
MEDICINES COMP    MDCOUSD EU       841.7        (22.3)     236.4
MEDICINES COMP    MZN GZ           841.7        (22.3)     236.4
MEDICINES COMP    MZN QT           841.7        (22.3)     236.4
MICHAELS COS INC  MIK US         2,128.3     (1,626.2)     583.0
MICHAELS COS INC  MIM GR         2,128.3     (1,626.2)     583.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MOT TE         9,409.0     (1,276.0)   1,176.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI US         9,409.0     (1,276.0)   1,176.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA TH       9,409.0     (1,276.0)   1,176.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI1USD EU     9,409.0     (1,276.0)   1,176.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA GR        9,409.0     (1,276.0)   1,176.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA GZ        9,409.0     (1,276.0)   1,176.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI1EUR EU     9,409.0     (1,276.0)   1,176.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA QT        9,409.0     (1,276.0)   1,176.0
MSCI INC          MSCI US        3,388.0       (166.5)     626.1
MSCI INC          3HM GR         3,388.0       (166.5)     626.1
MSCI INC          MSCIUSD EU     3,388.0       (166.5)     626.1
MSCI INC          3HM QT         3,388.0       (166.5)     626.1
MSG NETWORKS- A   MSGN US          830.4       (562.0)     204.8
MSG NETWORKS- A   1M4 QT           830.4       (562.0)     204.8
MSG NETWORKS- A   MSGNEUR EU       830.4       (562.0)     204.8
MSG NETWORKS- A   1M4 GR           830.4       (562.0)     204.8
MSG NETWORKS- A   1M4 TH           830.4       (562.0)     204.8
NATHANS FAMOUS    NATH US           91.2        (71.6)      70.7
NATHANS FAMOUS    NFA GR            91.2        (71.6)      70.7
NATIONAL CINEMED  NCMI US        1,141.8        (89.2)     120.4
NATIONAL CINEMED  XWM GR         1,141.8        (89.2)     120.4
NATIONAL CINEMED  NCMIEUR EU     1,141.8        (89.2)     120.4
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR GR         7,037.0     (3,813.0)   1,423.0
NAVISTAR INTL     NAV US         7,037.0     (3,813.0)   1,423.0
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR TH         7,037.0     (3,813.0)   1,423.0
NAVISTAR INTL     NAVEUR EU      7,037.0     (3,813.0)   1,423.0
NAVISTAR INTL     NAVUSD EU      7,037.0     (3,813.0)   1,423.0
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR GZ         7,037.0     (3,813.0)   1,423.0
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR QT         7,037.0     (3,813.0)   1,423.0
NEW ENG RLTY-LP   NEN US           247.0        (35.6)       -
NRC GROUP HOLDIN  NRCG US          376.1        (31.5)      63.1
NRG ENERGY        NRA GR        10,628.0     (1,215.0)   1,202.0
NRG ENERGY        NRA TH        10,628.0     (1,215.0)   1,202.0
NRG ENERGY        NRG1USD EU    10,628.0     (1,215.0)   1,202.0
NRG ENERGY        NRG US        10,628.0     (1,215.0)   1,202.0
NRG ENERGY        NRA QT        10,628.0     (1,215.0)   1,202.0
NRG ENERGY        NRGEUR EU     10,628.0     (1,215.0)   1,202.0
OMEROS CORP       OMER US           95.9       (100.2)      52.5
OMEROS CORP       3O8 GR            95.9       (100.2)      52.5
OMEROS CORP       OMERUSD EU        95.9       (100.2)      52.5
OMEROS CORP       3O8 TH            95.9       (100.2)      52.5
OMEROS CORP       OMEREUR EU        95.9       (100.2)      52.5
ONDAS HOLDINGS I  ONDS US            2.7        (14.9)     (15.2)
OPTIVA INC        OPT CN           123.4        (24.8)      15.7
OPTIVA INC        RKNEF US         123.4        (24.8)      15.7
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PZZA US          570.9       (296.7)       7.1
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PP1 GR           570.9       (296.7)       7.1
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PZZAEUR EU       570.9       (296.7)       7.1
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1 EU        39,801.0    (10,739.0)   2,251.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 GR        39,801.0    (10,739.0)   2,251.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM US         39,801.0    (10,739.0)   2,251.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1CHF EU     39,801.0    (10,739.0)   2,251.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 TH        39,801.0    (10,739.0)   2,251.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1 TE        39,801.0    (10,739.0)   2,251.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1EUR EU     39,801.0    (10,739.0)   2,251.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI SW        39,801.0    (10,739.0)   2,251.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMOR AV       39,801.0    (10,739.0)   2,251.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 GZ        39,801.0    (10,739.0)   2,251.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI1 IX       39,801.0    (10,739.0)   2,251.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI EB        39,801.0    (10,739.0)   2,251.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM* MM        39,801.0    (10,739.0)   2,251.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 QT        39,801.0    (10,739.0)   2,251.0
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT1USD EU    1,353.4       (382.8)     257.1
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL TH         1,353.4       (382.8)     257.1
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL GR         1,353.4       (382.8)     257.1
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL QT         1,353.4       (382.8)     257.1
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT1EUR EU    1,353.4       (382.8)     257.1
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT US        1,353.4       (382.8)     257.1
PRIORITY TECHNOL  PRTH US          388.6        (85.5)      21.1
PURPLE INNOVATIO  PRPL US           71.7         (2.0)      (0.9)
RESVERLOGIX CORP  RVX CN            14.4       (156.5)     (64.0)
REVLON INC-A      RVL1 GR        3,016.8     (1,056.8)      73.4
REVLON INC-A      REV US         3,016.8     (1,056.8)      73.4
REVLON INC-A      RVL1 TH        3,016.8     (1,056.8)      73.4
REVLON INC-A      REVEUR EU      3,016.8     (1,056.8)      73.4
RH                RH US          1,806.0        (23.0)    (235.5)
RH                RH* MM         1,806.0        (23.0)    (235.5)
RH                RHEUR EU       1,806.0        (23.0)    (235.5)
RH                RS1 GR         1,806.0        (23.0)    (235.5)
RIMINI STREET IN  RMNI US          118.9       (151.6)    (125.6)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RS8 TH           187.3        (12.0)     (68.9)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RS8 GR           187.3        (12.0)     (68.9)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RST US           187.3        (12.0)     (68.9)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RST1USD EU       187.3        (12.0)     (68.9)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RST1EUR EU       187.3        (12.0)     (68.9)
RR DONNELLEY & S  DLLN TH        3,640.8       (245.4)     548.8
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRD US         3,640.8       (245.4)     548.8
RR DONNELLEY & S  DLLN GR        3,640.8       (245.4)     548.8
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRDUSD EU      3,640.8       (245.4)     548.8
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRDEUR EU      3,640.8       (245.4)     548.8
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  SBH US         2,144.6       (214.7)     733.2
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  S7V GR         2,144.6       (214.7)     733.2
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  SBHEUR EU      2,144.6       (214.7)     733.2
SBA COMM CORP     4SB GR         7,213.7     (3,376.8)    (832.4)
SBA COMM CORP     SBAC US        7,213.7     (3,376.8)    (832.4)
SBA COMM CORP     SBACUSD EU     7,213.7     (3,376.8)    (832.4)
SBA COMM CORP     4SB GZ         7,213.7     (3,376.8)    (832.4)
SBA COMM CORP     SBACEUR EU     7,213.7     (3,376.8)    (832.4)
SBA COMM CORP     SBJ TH         7,213.7     (3,376.8)    (832.4)
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  SGMS US        7,717.8     (2,463.2)     621.0
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  SGMSUSD EU     7,717.8     (2,463.2)     621.0
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  TJW GR         7,717.8     (2,463.2)     621.0
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  TJW TH         7,717.8     (2,463.2)     621.0
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  TJW GZ         7,717.8     (2,463.2)     621.0
SEALED AIR CORP   SDA GR         5,050.2       (348.6)      66.2
SEALED AIR CORP   SEE US         5,050.2       (348.6)      66.2
SEALED AIR CORP   SEE1EUR EU     5,050.2       (348.6)      66.2
SEALED AIR CORP   SDA TH         5,050.2       (348.6)      66.2
SEALED AIR CORP   SDA QT         5,050.2       (348.6)      66.2
SERES THERAPEUTI  MCRB1EUR EU      120.5        (48.0)      50.6
SERES THERAPEUTI  MCRB US          120.5        (48.0)      50.6
SERES THERAPEUTI  1S9 GR           120.5        (48.0)      50.6
SHELL MIDSTREAM   SHLX US        1,913.5       (257.0)     231.4
SHELL MIDSTREAM   49M QT         1,913.5       (257.0)     231.4
SHELL MIDSTREAM   49M GR         1,913.5       (257.0)     231.4
SHELL MIDSTREAM   49M TH         1,913.5       (257.0)     231.4
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO GR         8,172.7     (1,816.9)  (2,324.4)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO TH         8,172.7     (1,816.9)  (2,324.4)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRIUSD EU     8,172.7     (1,816.9)  (2,324.4)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI TE        8,172.7     (1,816.9)  (2,324.4)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI US        8,172.7     (1,816.9)  (2,324.4)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRIEUR EU     8,172.7     (1,816.9)  (2,324.4)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO GZ         8,172.7     (1,816.9)  (2,324.4)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI AV        8,172.7     (1,816.9)  (2,324.4)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO QT         8,172.7     (1,816.9)  (2,324.4)
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  6FE GR         2,517.3       (117.8)    (126.4)
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  SIX US         2,517.3       (117.8)    (126.4)
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  SIXEUR EU      2,517.3       (117.8)    (126.4)
SLEEP NUMBER COR  SL2 GR           470.1       (109.6)    (337.8)
SLEEP NUMBER COR  SNBR US          470.1       (109.6)    (337.8)
SLEEP NUMBER COR  SNBREUR EU       470.1       (109.6)    (337.8)
STARBUCKS CORP    SRB GR        19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS CORP    SRB TH        19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX* MM      19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX US       19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX IM       19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX SW       19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS CORP    SRB GZ        19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX AV       19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX TE       19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUXEUR EU    19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUXUSD SW    19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUXUSD EU    19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS CORP    SRB QT        19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUXCHF EU    19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX CI       19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARBUCKS-BDR     SBUB34 BZ     19,981.3     (2,878.8)   2,248.8
STARCO BRANDS IN  STCB US            0.1         (0.9)      (0.9)
STEALTH BIOTHERA  S1BA GR           11.6       (149.1)     (31.0)
STEALTH BIOTHERA  MITO US           11.6       (149.1)     (31.0)
SUNPOWER CORP     S9P2 GR        2,352.6       (149.9)     368.8
SUNPOWER CORP     S9P2 TH        2,352.6       (149.9)     368.8
SUNPOWER CORP     SPWR US        2,352.6       (149.9)     368.8
SUNPOWER CORP     SPWREUR EU     2,352.6       (149.9)     368.8
SUNPOWER CORP     SPWRUSD EU     2,352.6       (149.9)     368.8
SUNPOWER CORP     S9P2 QT        2,352.6       (149.9)     368.8
TAUBMAN CENTERS   TU8 GR         4,344.1       (300.1)       -
TAUBMAN CENTERS   TCO US         4,344.1       (300.1)       -
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDG US        12,389.3     (1,666.9)   2,975.4
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D GR        12,389.3     (1,666.9)   2,975.4
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDG* MM       12,389.3     (1,666.9)   2,975.4
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D TH        12,389.3     (1,666.9)   2,975.4
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDGUSD EU     12,389.3     (1,666.9)   2,975.4
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D QT        12,389.3     (1,666.9)   2,975.4
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDGEUR EU     12,389.3     (1,666.9)   2,975.4
TRIUMPH GROUP     TGI US         3,330.5       (276.5)     421.7
TRIUMPH GROUP     TG7 GR         3,330.5       (276.5)     421.7
TRIUMPH GROUP     TGIEUR EU      3,330.5       (276.5)     421.7
TRULIEVE CANNABI  TRUL CN            0.1         (0.2)      (0.2)
TRULIEVE CANNABI  TCNNF US           0.1         (0.2)      (0.2)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP GR         1,308.8       (235.2)    (138.5)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP US         1,308.8       (235.2)    (138.5)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP1USD EU     1,308.8       (235.2)    (138.5)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP GZ         1,308.8       (235.2)    (138.5)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP TH         1,308.8       (235.2)    (138.5)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP1EUR EU     1,308.8       (235.2)    (138.5)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP QT         1,308.8       (235.2)    (138.5)
UNISYS CORP       USY1 TH        2,457.6     (1,299.6)     378.1
UNISYS CORP       USY1 GR        2,457.6     (1,299.6)     378.1
UNISYS CORP       UIS US         2,457.6     (1,299.6)     378.1
UNISYS CORP       UIS1 SW        2,457.6     (1,299.6)     378.1
UNISYS CORP       UISEUR EU      2,457.6     (1,299.6)     378.1
UNISYS CORP       UISCHF EU      2,457.6     (1,299.6)     378.1
UNISYS CORP       USY1 GZ        2,457.6     (1,299.6)     378.1
UNISYS CORP       USY1 QT        2,457.6     (1,299.6)     378.1
UNISYS CORP       UIS EU         2,457.6     (1,299.6)     378.1
UNITI GROUP INC   CSALUSD EU     4,592.9     (1,406.7)       -
UNITI GROUP INC   UNIT US        4,592.9     (1,406.7)       -
UNITI GROUP INC   8XC GR         4,592.9     (1,406.7)       -
UNITI GROUP INC   8XC TH         4,592.9     (1,406.7)       -
VALVOLINE INC     0V4 GR         1,832.0       (343.0)     288.0
VALVOLINE INC     0V4 TH         1,832.0       (343.0)     288.0
VALVOLINE INC     VVVEUR EU      1,832.0       (343.0)     288.0
VALVOLINE INC     0V4 QT         1,832.0       (343.0)     288.0
VALVOLINE INC     VVV US         1,832.0       (343.0)     288.0
VANTAGE DRILL-UT  VTGGF US       1,129.6        (64.7)     263.9
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR US         1,549.5       (547.4)     387.3
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR GR         1,549.5       (547.4)     387.3
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGREUR EU      1,549.5       (547.4)     387.3
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGRUSD EU      1,549.5       (547.4)     387.3
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR QT         1,549.5       (547.4)     387.3
VERISIGN INC      VRS GR         1,914.5     (1,385.5)     369.4
VERISIGN INC      VRSN US        1,914.5     (1,385.5)     369.4
VERISIGN INC      VRS TH         1,914.5     (1,385.5)     369.4
VERISIGN INC      VRSN* MM       1,914.5     (1,385.5)     369.4
VERISIGN INC      VRSNUSD EU     1,914.5     (1,385.5)     369.4
VERISIGN INC      VRSNEUR EU     1,914.5     (1,385.5)     369.4
VERISIGN INC      VRS GZ         1,914.5     (1,385.5)     369.4
VERISIGN INC      VRS QT         1,914.5     (1,385.5)     369.4
W&T OFFSHORE INC  WTI US           848.9       (324.8)      39.9
W&T OFFSHORE INC  UWV GR           848.9       (324.8)      39.9
W&T OFFSHORE INC  WTI1EUR EU       848.9       (324.8)      39.9
WAYFAIR INC- A    W US           1,890.9       (330.7)     116.7
WAYFAIR INC- A    1WF QT         1,890.9       (330.7)     116.7
WAYFAIR INC- A    1WF GR         1,890.9       (330.7)     116.7
WAYFAIR INC- A    WEUR EU        1,890.9       (330.7)     116.7
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 GR         1,414.5       (805.0)      25.1
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTW US         1,414.5       (805.0)      25.1
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTWUSD EU      1,414.5       (805.0)      25.1
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 TH         1,414.5       (805.0)      25.1
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 GZ         1,414.5       (805.0)      25.1
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTWEUR EU      1,414.5       (805.0)      25.1
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 QT         1,414.5       (805.0)      25.1
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTW AV         1,414.5       (805.0)      25.1
WESTERN UNIO-BDR  WUNI34 BZ      8,996.8       (309.8)    (645.5)
WESTERN UNION     W3U TH         8,996.8       (309.8)    (645.5)
WESTERN UNION     WU* MM         8,996.8       (309.8)    (645.5)
WESTERN UNION     W3U GR         8,996.8       (309.8)    (645.5)
WESTERN UNION     WU US          8,996.8       (309.8)    (645.5)
WESTERN UNION     WUUSD EU       8,996.8       (309.8)    (645.5)
WESTERN UNION     WUEUR EU       8,996.8       (309.8)    (645.5)
WESTERN UNION     W3U GZ         8,996.8       (309.8)    (645.5)
WESTERN UNION     W3U QT         8,996.8       (309.8)    (645.5)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WOW US         2,419.6       (290.3)    (111.7)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WU5 QT         2,419.6       (290.3)    (111.7)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WOW1EUR EU     2,419.6       (290.3)    (111.7)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WU5 GR         2,419.6       (290.3)    (111.7)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WU5 TH         2,419.6       (290.3)    (111.7)
WINGSTOP INC      WING1EUR EU      139.7       (224.8)       3.4
WINGSTOP INC      WING US          139.7       (224.8)       3.4
WINGSTOP INC      EWG GR           139.7       (224.8)       3.4
WINMARK CORP      WINA US           46.7         (4.8)      11.8
WINMARK CORP      GBZ GR            46.7         (4.8)      11.8
WINMARK CORP      WINAUSD EU        46.7         (4.8)      11.8
WORKIVA INC       WKEUR EU         231.1         (9.7)     (14.4)
WORKIVA INC       WK US            231.1         (9.7)     (14.4)
WORKIVA INC       0WKA GR          231.1         (9.7)     (14.4)
WYNDHAM DESTINAT  WD5 TH         7,158.0       (569.0)     283.0
WYNDHAM DESTINAT  WYNUSD EU      7,158.0       (569.0)     283.0
WYNDHAM DESTINAT  WD5 GR         7,158.0       (569.0)     283.0
WYNDHAM DESTINAT  WYND US        7,158.0       (569.0)     283.0
WYNDHAM DESTINAT  WD5 QT         7,158.0       (569.0)     283.0
WYNDHAM DESTINAT  WYNEUR EU      7,158.0       (569.0)     283.0
YELLOW PAGES LTD  Y CN             442.4       (119.2)      40.4
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 GR        1,617.1       (301.2)     168.5
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YRCW US        1,617.1       (301.2)     168.5
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YRCWUSD EU     1,617.1       (301.2)     168.5
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 TH        1,617.1       (301.2)     168.5
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YRCWEUR EU     1,617.1       (301.2)     168.5
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 QT        1,617.1       (301.2)     168.5
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR TH         4,130.0     (7,926.0)     (94.0)
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR GR         4,130.0     (7,926.0)     (94.0)
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM US         4,130.0     (7,926.0)     (94.0)
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM* MM        4,130.0     (7,926.0)     (94.0)
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR GZ         4,130.0     (7,926.0)     (94.0)
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMUSD SW      4,130.0     (7,926.0)     (94.0)
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMUSD EU      4,130.0     (7,926.0)     (94.0)
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMEUR EU      4,130.0     (7,926.0)     (94.0)
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR QT         4,130.0     (7,926.0)     (94.0)
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM SW         4,130.0     (7,926.0)     (94.0)



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2019.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***