/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/190426.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Friday, April 26, 2019, Vol. 23, No. 115

                            Headlines

132 30TH STREET: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
1515-GEENERGY HOLDING: Taps Funk & Zeifer as Energy Consultant
1515-GEENERGY HOLDING: Taps GlassRatner as Financial Advisor
1515-GEENERGY HOLDING: Taps Omni Management as Admin Agent
1515-GEENERGY HOLDING: Taps SSG Advisors as Investment Banker

281 NE 78TH ST: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
5200 ENTERPRISES: Files Addendum to Disclosure/Plan
ACHAOGEN INC: Taps Kurtzman Carson as Claims Agent
AMERICAN PARKING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
AMERICAN TECHNICAL: Court Denies Bid to Extend Exclusivity Period

API HOLDINGS: S&P Assigns 'B' Issuer Credit Rating; Outlook Stable
APX GROUP: S&P Rates $250MM Senior Secured Notes 'B-'
ASPEN VILLAGE: Affiliate Taps Marcus & Millichap as Broker
ASPEN VILLAGE: Seeks to Hire Marcus & Millichap as Broker
BAILEY'S EXPRESS: Plan Admin Taps Adrienne Woods as Counsel

BEYDA ADULT: Seeks to Hire Van Horn Law Group as Counsel
CABLE ONE: Moody's Lowers Ratings on 1st Lien Loans B1/B2 to 'Ba3'
CADIZ INC: TRF Master Intends to Nominate Five Directors
CASTILLO I PARTNERSHIP: Unsecureds to Get Payment in 5 Years
COCRYSTAL PHARMA: Registers 1.7-Mil. Shares for Possible Resale

COLLEEN & TOM: Seeks to Extend Exclusive Filing Period to Sept. 30
CONCRETE PUMPING: S&P Affirms 'B' Rating on $397MM Term Loan
CONFLUENCE ENERGY: Chelemedo Buying Kremmling Property for $800K
CONSIS INTERNATIONAL: May 15 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
CORNERSTAR WINE: Taps Kutner Brinen as Legal Counsel

DENNIS JOHNSON II: Trustee Taps Rolston & Company as Appraiser
DRY EYE: Unsecured Creditors to Get $1,292 Monthly for 60 Months
DSN INC: $582K Sale of Carthage Property to Castleburys Approved
EAST GRAND PREPARATORY, TX: S&P Alters Rev. Bond Outlook to Stable
EVEN STEVENS: Seeks to Hire ESBE Stategic as Consultant

EW ACQUISITION: Case Summary Unsecured Creditor
EXCO RESOURCES: May 3 Hearing on Disclosure Statement Approval
FIRSTENERGY SOLUTIONS: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for May 20
FLAMBEAUX GAS: U.S. Trustee Objects to Disclosure Statement
FLAMBEAUX GAS: Unsecureds to Get Full Payment Over 27 Quarters

FRANKLIN ACQUISITIONS: Trustee Selling El Paso Property for $450K
GABRIEL SAN ROMAN: $494K Sale of Hempstead Property Okayed
GARDEN OAKS: Committee Amends Plan to Cap Transfer Fee at $1,500
GLANSAOL HOLDINGS: Directed to Revise Plan, Disclosures
GLOBAL EAGLE: Incurs $236.6 Million Net Loss in 2018

GNC HOLDINGS: Incurs $15.3 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
GOGO INC: Issues $905 Million 9.875% Senior Secured Notes
GOGO INC: Satisfies Financing Condition for Tender Offer
GOURMET EXPRESS: $8.5K Sale of All Remnant Assets to Oak Point OK'd
GRAND AVENUE 364: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

GREENTECH AUTOMOTIVE: Auction Sale of All Assets Approved
GULFSTREAM DIAGNOSTICS: $58K Sale of 2 Medical Equipment Approved
H2O BAGEL: Parkland Buying Parkland Property for $100K
HERB PHILIPSON'S: Unsecured Creditors to Get 100% Over 5 Years
IDEAL DEVELOPMENT: May 13 Plan Confirmation Hearing

JG CONTRACTING: May 20 Combined Plan, Disclosure Statement Hearing
JOSEPH HEATH: Naebzadeh Buying Alexandria Property for $480K
JOSEPH HEATH: Winifred Buying Alexandria Property for $485K
KHRL GROUP: Seeks to Hire Advanced Evaluation as Appraiser
KONTOOR BRANDS: Moody's Assigns 'Ba2' CFR & New Sr. Secured Rating

KONTOOR BRANDS: S&P Assigns 'BB-' ICR on Spinoff; Outlook Stable
LITCHFIELD LASER: New Plan Discloses 3-Tiered Payment Approach
LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR; Outlook Stable
LONG BLOCKCHAIN: Incurs $742,600 Net Loss in Q3 2018
LOUISIANA PELLETS: Trustee Suit vs Ex-Officers Remanded to La. Ct.

MACAULEY CONTRACTING: $210K Sale of Assets to Mike Beeler Approved
MIDATECH PHARMA: Incurs GBP15.03 Million Net Loss in 2018
MILLERBERND SYSTEMS: $2.3M Sale of All Assets to Burwell Approved
MR. STEVEN: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for May 21
NAEEM W. BUTT: Court Dismisses Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case

NEW ENGLAND: Sets Bidding Procedures for All Eastern-Carrier Assets
NOBLE REY: $300K Sale of All Assets to Craft Equipment Approved
NORANDA ALUMINUM: CalFirst Wins Summary Judgment Bid vs Boh Bros.
NOVUM PHARMA: Sale/Abandonment Procedures of De Minimis Assets OK'd
OPERATION SIMULATION: FirstBank Objects to Disclosure Statement

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS: Moody's Alters Outlook on B2 CFR to Positive
PANNEL PARTNERSHIP: $3.4M Sale of Harris County Property Approved
PATRICK JOHANNES: 9th Cir. Affirms Confirmation of Ch. 11 Plan
PERFORMANCE POOL: Seeks to Hire Hiratsuka as Accountant
PERFORMANCE POOL: Taps Kutner Brinen as Legal Counsel

PG&E CORP: Tort Claimants Panel Taps DSI as Financial Advisor
PHI INC: Seeks to Hire Jones Walker as Special Counsel
QUALITY CONSTRUCTION: May 14 Plan Confirmation Objection Deadline
RAVAGO HOLDINGS: Moody's Affirms B1 CFR, Outlook Stable
REDIGI INC: U.S. Trustee Objects to Disclosure Statement

REDONDO CONSTRUCTION: CLI, Remodelco Entitled to Interest Awards
REGENCY PARK: Liquidating Agent Seeks to Hire R.O.I. as Broker
REVOLUTION MONITORING: May 5 Deadline to Object to Plan
ROSH TISH: Seeks to Hire Sobers Law as Legal Counsel
RYDER CONTRACTING: Seeks to Hire Lawrence J. Ickes as Accountant

RYDER CONTRACTING: Seeks to Hire Leaberry Law Firm as Counsel
SAMSON RESOURCES: Court Grants Bid to Dismiss Nesses' Suit
SILVER SCREEN: 2 Creditors Object to Disclosure Statement
SKYMARK PROPERTIES: Plan Proposes 2 Options for Unsecureds
SOLUTIONS BY DESIGN: Taps Rodriguez Perez as Accountant

SPARKLE'S HAMBURGER: Unsecureds to Get Payments Over 36 Months
SUNTEC ALUMINUM: Seeks to Hire Cape Coral as Accountant
TANGO TRANSPORT: Ct. Rejects Navistar Partial Summary Judgment Bid
TOWN STAR: May 7 Plan Confirmation Hearing
VEHICLE ALIGNMENT: Secured Creditors to Get 100% Over 7 Years

WAYNE BAILEY: Court Allows Objection to Southern Roots' PACA Claim
WAYPOINT LEASING: May 16 Disclosure Statement Hearing
WHITE EAGLE: Taps Elucidor as Expert Valuation Consultant
WHITE EAGLE: Taps Grant Thornton as Accountant
XPEERANT INC: Unsecureds to Get $2,000 Per Month for 60 Months

YUMA ENERGY: Confirms No Material Change
[^] BOOK REVIEW: Full Faith and Credit: The Great S & L Debacle

                            *********

132 30TH STREET: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 132 30th Street of Brooklyn Corp
        132 30th Street
        Brooklyn, NY 11232

Business Description: 132 30th Street of Brooklyn provides
                      residential building construction
                      services.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 24, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn)

Case No.: 19-42425

Judge: Hon. Nancy Hershey Lord

Debtor's Counsel: Bruce Weiner, Esq.
                  ROSENBERG MUSSO & WEINER LLP
                  26 Court Street, Suite 2211
                  Brooklyn, NY 11242
                  Tel: (718) 855-6840
                  Fax: 718-625-1966
                  E-mail: courts@nybankruptcy.net

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $500,000 to $1 million

The petition was signed by Sean Doodnath Seenath, president.

The Debtor did not include in the petition a list of its 20 largest
unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb19-42425.pdf


1515-GEENERGY HOLDING: Taps Funk & Zeifer as Energy Consultant
--------------------------------------------------------------
1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to hire Funk & Zeifer
LLP.

The firm will provide energy consulting services in connection with
the Chapter 11 cases of the company and its affiliates.  The firm
will charge $495 per hour for its services.

Peter Funk, a partner at Funk & Zeifer, disclosed in court filings
that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Peter Funk, Esq.
     Funk & Zeifer LLP
     Funk & Zeifer LLP
     260 Madison Avenue, 17th Floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Office: (646) 597-6284
     Mobile: (917) 886-6296
     Fax: (646) 597-6283
     Email: peter.funk@funkandzeifer.com|

                About 1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC
                          and BBPC LLC

With its headquarters in Brooklyn, New York, BBPC LLC, doing
business as Great Eastern Energy, provides energy commodities to
retail customers.  BBPC began serving natural gas customers in New
York, New Jersey and Massachusetts in 2000, and later expanded to
serve electricity customers in New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts,
and Connecticut in 2013.  1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC owns 100%
of the equity in BBPC.

1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC and BBPC LLC sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 19-10303 and 19-10304) on Feb.
14, 2019.  The Debtors estimated $50 million to $100 million in
assets and the same range of liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Hon. Kevin J. Carey is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped McLaughlin & Stern, PLLC as bankruptcy counsel;
Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP as Delaware counsel;
Glassratner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC as financial advisor; and
Omni Management Group, Inc., as claims, noticing, and
administrative agent.


1515-GEENERGY HOLDING: Taps GlassRatner as Financial Advisor
------------------------------------------------------------
GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to hire GlassRatner Advisory &
Capital Group, LLC as its financial advisor.

The firm will assist the company and its affiliates with financial
reporting; advise the Debtors concerning the sale of their assets;
assist in the preparation of a plan of reorganization; assist in
developing financial and liquidity projections; and provide other
financial advisory services in connection with their Chapter 11
cases.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Thomas Buck                $595
     Principals             $450 - $625
     Managing Directors     $325 - $495
     Directors              $325 - $495
     Associates             $225 - $325

GlassRatner received advance payments in the amount of $150,000
from the Debtors.

Thomas Buck, a principal of GlassRatner, disclosed in court filings
that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Thomas Buck
     GlassRatner Advisory and Capital Group, LLC
     299 Park Avenue, 21st Floor
     New York, NY 10171
     Main: (212) 457-3322
     Mobile: (917) 488-4148
     Email: tbuck@glassratner.com

                About 1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC
                          and BBPC LLC

With its headquarters in Brooklyn, New York, BBPC LLC, doing
business as Great Eastern Energy, provides energy commodities to
retail customers.  BBPC began serving natural gas customers in New
York, New Jersey and Massachusetts in 2000, and later expanded to
serve electricity customers in New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts,
and Connecticut in 2013.  1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC owns 100%
of the equity in BBPC.

1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC and BBPC LLC sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 19-10303 and 19-10304) on Feb.
14, 2019.  The Debtors estimated $50 million to $100 million in
assets and the same range of liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Hon. Kevin J. Carey is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped McLaughlin & Stern, PLLC as bankruptcy counsel;
Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP as Delaware counsel;
Glassratner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC as financial advisor; and
Omni Management Group, Inc., as claims, noticing, and
administrative agent.


1515-GEENERGY HOLDING: Taps Omni Management as Admin Agent
----------------------------------------------------------
1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to hire Omni
Management Group, Inc. as its administrative agent.

The firm will provide bankruptcy administrative services, which
include the solicitation and tabulation of votes in connection with
any Chapter 11 plan filed by the company and its affiliates, and
managing the distributions made pursuant to the plan.

Omni will be paid at these hourly rates for its services:

     Analyst                    $25 - $40
     Consultants                $50 - $125
     Senior Consultants        $140 - $155
     Equity Services               $175
     Technology/Programming     $85 - $135

Omni received a $40,000 retainer from the Debtors.

Paul Deutch, senior vice president of Omni, disclosed in court
filings that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Omni can be reached through:

     Paul H. Deutch
     Omni Management Group
     1120 Avenue of the Americas, 4th Floor
     New York, NY 10036
     Tel: 212-302-3580
     Fax: 212-302-3820
     Email: nycontact@omnimgt.com

               About 1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC
                        and BBPC LLC

With its headquarters in Brooklyn, New York, BBPC LLC, doing
business as Great Eastern Energy, provides energy commodities to
retail customers.  BBPC began serving natural gas customers in New
York, New Jersey and Massachusetts in 2000, and later expanded to
serve electricity customers in New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts,
and Connecticut in 2013.  1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC owns 100%
of the equity in BBPC.

1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC and BBPC LLC sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 19-10303 and 19-10304) on Feb.
14, 2019.  The Debtors estimated $50 million to $100 million in
assets and the same range of liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Hon. Kevin J. Carey is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped McLaughlin & Stern, PLLC as bankruptcy counsel;
Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP as Delaware counsel;
Glassratner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC as financial advisor; and
Omni Management Group, Inc., as claims, noticing, and
administrative agent.


1515-GEENERGY HOLDING: Taps SSG Advisors as Investment Banker
-------------------------------------------------------------
GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to hire SSG Advisors, LLC as its
investment banker.

The firm will provide services to the company and its affiliates
during the pendency of their Chapter 11 cases related to a sale of
all or a portion of their assets.  These services include
solicitating offers from potential buyers, and assisting the
Debtors in structuring a sale and in negotiating sale agreements.

SSG will be paid an initial fee of $40,000 due upon the signing of
its employment agreement with the Debtors and a monthly fee of
$40,000.

Upon the consummation of a sale or restructuring transaction, SSG
will receive a fee equal to the greater of $450,000 or 2.5 percent
of the "total consideration."  The firm has agreed to cap the
transaction fee at $750,000.

In the event there is no sale or restructuring transaction and the
Debtors or their lender determines to liquidate the assets, SSG
will receive a $200,000 fee.

J. Scott Victor, managing director of SSG, disclosed in court
filings that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

SSG can be reached through:

     J. Scott Victor
     SSG Advisors, LLC
     Five Tower Bridge, Suite 420
     300 Barr Harbor Drive
     West Conshohocken, PA 19428
     Phone: (610) 940-1094
     Fax : (610) 940-3875

                About 1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC
                          and BBPC LLC

With its headquarters in Brooklyn, New York, BBPC LLC, doing
business as Great Eastern Energy, provides energy commodities to
retail customers.  BBPC began serving natural gas customers in New
York, New Jersey and Massachusetts in 2000, and later expanded to
serve electricity customers in New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts,
and Connecticut in 2013.  1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC owns 100%
of the equity in BBPC.

1515-GEEnergy Holding Co. LLC and BBPC LLC sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 19-10303 and 19-10304) on Feb.
14, 2019.  The Debtors estimated $50 million to $100 million in
assets and the same range of liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Hon. Kevin J. Carey is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped McLaughlin & Stern, PLLC as bankruptcy counsel;
Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP as Delaware counsel;
Glassratner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC as financial advisor; and
Omni Management Group, Inc., as claims, noticing, and
administrative agent.


281 NE 78TH ST: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 281 NE 78th St LLC
        14000 NE 1 Ave
        Miami, FL 33161

Business Description: 281 NE 78th St LLC listed its business as
                      Single Asset Real Estate (as defined in
                      11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 24, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Florida (Miami)

Case No.: 19-15323

Judge: Hon. Laurel M Isicoff

Debtor's Counsel: Robert C. Meyer, Esq.
                  ROBERT C. MEYER, PA                    
                  2223 Coral Way
                  Miami, FL 33145
                  Tel: 305-285-8838
                  Fax: 305-285-8919
                  E-mail: meyerrobertc@cs.com

Total Assets: $1,800,000

Total Liabilities: $750,000

The petition was signed by Robinson Julien, manager.

The Debtor stated it has no unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-15323.pdf


5200 ENTERPRISES: Files Addendum to Disclosure/Plan
---------------------------------------------------
5200 Enterprises Limited files an addendum to its Combined
Disclosure Statement and Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.

Shortly after the Debtor purchased the owns real estate located at
5200-5202 1st Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, and prior to the Debtor
actually beginning any type of operations, the City of New York
placed the property on the inactive site registry list after
discovering the existence of PCBs.  Soon after placing the property
on the inactive site registry the City of New York took possession
of the building and eventually began remediation on the property.
The remediation is believed to have just been completed.  Now that
the remediation is believed to be complete NYCTL 1996-1 Trust and
the Bank of New York, as collateral agent and custodian for NYCTL
1996-1 Trust decided to set a sale date on a 2005 case regarding
old tax liens on the property.

The Debtor has attached an actual copy of the Amended Complaint
filed against the City of New York which speaks for itself.  The
amount of potential damages has previously been disclosed by the
expert report attached to the Disclosure Statement.

The Debtor has prepared, based upon the Schedules and Proof of
Claims filed through April 10, 2019, a spreadsheet that shows
current claims that may be allowed against the Estate.
Other claims may be allowed should they be filed along with an
appropriate Motion to Allow Late Filed Claim and the Court grants
such Motion.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated April 10, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/yyhgrcnh from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Counsel for Debtor is Jason A. Burgess, Esq., in Atlantic Beach,
Florida.

               About 5200 Enterprises Limited

5200 Enterprises Limited is the fee simple owner of a real property
located at 5200-5202 1st Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11232, having a
tax records valuation of $6.43 million.

5200 Enterprises Limited, based in Jacksonville, Florida, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 18-01646) on May 16,
2018.  In the petition signed by John A. Luhrs, president, the
Debtor disclosed $6.43 million in assets and $3.25 million in
liabilities.  The Hon. Jerry A. Funk presides over the case.  Jason
A. Burgess, Esq., at The Law Offices of Jason A. Burgess, LLC,
serves as bankruptcy counsel.


ACHAOGEN INC: Taps Kurtzman Carson as Claims Agent
--------------------------------------------------
Achaogen, Inc. received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware to hire Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as
its claims and noticing agent.

The firm will oversee the distribution of notices and will assist
in the maintenance, processing and docketing of proofs of claim
filed in the Debtor's Chapter 11 case.

Prior to its bankruptcy filing, the Debtor provided the firm a
$35,000 retainer.

Robert Jordan, managing director of Kurtzman, disclosed in court
filings that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Robert Jordan
     Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC
     2335 Alaska Avenue
     El Segundo, CA 90245
     Tel: (310) 823-9000

                     About Achaogen Inc.

South San Francisco, California-based Achaogen, Inc. --
http://www.achaogen.com/-- is a biopharmaceutical company focused
on the discovery, development, and commercialization of innovative
antibacterial treatments against multi-drug resistant gram-negative
infections.

Achaogen, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Del., Lead Case No. 19-10844) on April 25, 2019.
The petition was signed by Blake Wise, chief executive officer.

The case has been assigned to Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon.  

As of Jan. 31, 2019, the Debtor had estimated assets of $91,607,000
and liabilities of $119,956,000.  

The Debtor tapped Hogan Lovells US LLP as its bankruptcy counsel;
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP as co-counsel; Meru LLC as
financial advisor; Cassel Salpeter & Co., LLC as investment banker,
and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims, noticing and
solicitation agent.


AMERICAN PARKING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: American Parking System Inc.
        PO Box 192239
        San Juan, PR 00902

Business Description: Headquartered in San Juan, Puerto Rico,
                      American Parking System owns and manages
                      parking lots.  The Company previously sought
                      bankruptcy protection on April 8, 2016
                     (Bankr. D. P.R. Case No. 16-02761).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 24, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Puerto Rico (Old San Juan)

Case No.: 19-02243

Debtor's Counsel: Alexis Fuentes-Hernandez, Esq.
                  FUENTES LAW OFFICES, LLC
                  PO Box 9022726
                  San Juan, PR 00902
                  Tel: (787) 722-5216
                  Fax: (787) 722-5206
                  Email: alex@fuentes-law.com

Debtor's
Financial
Consultant:       CPA LUIS R. CARRASQUILLO & CO., P.S.C.

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Miguel A. Cabral Veras, president.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb19-02243.pdf

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
1. AGA CPA's & Advisors              Professional         $30,000
801 International Pkwy                 Services
Lake Mary, FL 32746

2. Calaf, Federico                   Professional         $17,000
Calle Jose Martin #800                 Services
San Juan, PR 00907

3. CRIM                             Property Taxes       $121,991
PO Box 195378
San Juan, PR 00919-5387

4. De Lage Landen Financial         Lease Arrears          $6,649
Services, Inc.                       Photocopier
Attn: L Levin
1111 Old Eagle School Road
Wayne, PA 09087

5. De Leon Perez, Marino                Loans             $21,000
Barrio Cambute, Calle San
Andres #1
Carolina, PR 00985

6. Department of Justice of PR      Rent Arrears         $564,788
Oficina Estatal De
Conservacion Historica
P.O. Box 9023935
San Juan, PR 00902-3935

7. E Ramirez Associates, LLC        Professional           $8,500
P.O. Box 11741                        Services
San Juan, PR 00922

8. Garcia, Felix M.                     Loans             $60,000
1348 Calle Oberta
San Juan, PR 00908

9. Gonzalez, Esq. Osvaldo R.       Professional          $922,188
Calle 2 #32, Paseo Alto             Services &
San Juan, PR 00926-5917               Loans

10. Hospital Damas, Inc.           Rent Arrears          $105,000
2213 Ponce By Pass
Ponce, PR 00717

11. Llovet-Diaz, Esq., Pedro A.    Professional            $8,000
Urb. Caribe 1581, Calle              Services
Cavalieri St. 1
San Juan, PR 00927

12. Metro Santurce, Inc.           Arrears Lease         $105,000
P.O. Box 195579
San Juan, PR 00919-5579

13. New Century Finance, Corp.       Financing            $18,142
P.O. Box 12011                        Arrears
San Juan, PR 00914

14. Pellot-Gonzalez Tax            Professional          $450,000
Attorneys & Counselors               Services       
at Law, PSC
Hato Rey Center
268 Ponce De Leon Ave.
San Juan, PR 00918

15. Piriz Ravel, Gelcy Z.           Employment             $6,333
Calle Jardin Don Juan 466,           Lawsuit
Jardines Del Mediterraneo
Toa Alta, PR 00953

16. PPG Architectural Co.          Professional            $3,252
630 Calle Feria                      Services
Carolina, PR 00987

17. PR Department of Labor           Employee             $66,234
P.O. Box 195540                       Claims
San Juan, PR 00918-5540

18. San Francisco Health           Rent Arrears           $26,320
System, Inc.
Hospital San Francisco
P.O. Box 29025
San Juan, PR 00929-0025

19. Shred-It USA, LLC              Professional            $4,797
P.O. Box 364527                      Services
San Juan, PR 00936-4527

20. Universal Finance, Inc.          Finance              $14,448
P.O. Box 70380                       Charges
San Juan, PR 00936-8380


AMERICAN TECHNICAL: Court Denies Bid to Extend Exclusivity Period
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A U.S. bankruptcy judge denied the motion of American Technical
Services, Inc. to extend the period during which the company alone
can file a Chapter 11 plan and solicit acceptances for the plan.

In an order signed April 24, Judge Catherine Peek McEwen of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida agreed
with creditor Ecker Capital, LLC that the request is "untimely."

"The existing period expired on April 10, 2019, before the motion
asking for an extension of that time period was even filed," Judge
McEwen wrote in her decision.  

The order dealt only with American Technical's request to extend
the exclusivity periods and Ecker's objection to the extension.
The bankruptcy judge said she will enter a separate order on
Ecker's motion to approve the disclosure statement detailing its
proposed Chapter 11 plan for American Technical, and will rule on
American Technical's objection to the motion in that order.

In its objection, American Technical argued that the disclosure
statement and the rival plan proposed by Ecker were not filed in
good faith.  

"The acquisition of a relatively minor claim in an attempt to wrest
control of the debtor from its principals is a further indication
that Ecker is attempting to acquire the debtor for less than its
fair market value, and to not compensate the debtor for the value
added by the upgrading of its services during the pendency of the
Chapter 11 case," the company said in court papers.

              About American Technical Services

American Technical Services, Inc., sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 18-08783) on
Oct. 12, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated
assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.
The case has been assigned to Judge Catherine Peek McEwen.  The
Debtor tapped Palm Harbor Law Group as its legal counsel.


API HOLDINGS: S&P Assigns 'B' Issuer Credit Rating; Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issuer credit rating to API
Holdings III Corp., and its 'B' issue-level and '3' recovery
ratings to the company's first-lien credit facility consisting of a
$50 million revolver and $245 million first-lien term loan.

AEA Investors is acquiring API Technologies Corp. (the operating
company) through API Holdings III Corp.. The acquisition will be
financed from proceeds from a new $245 million first-lien term loan
and $90 million second-lien term loan. The first-lien credit
facility also includes a $50 million revolver to provide liquidity,
which S&P expects to remain undrawn in the near term. The
second-lien credit facility (which has already been placed and will
not be rated) also includes a $50 million delayed-draw term loan.
The company has no stated use for the delayed-draw term loan, and
S&P expects it to remain undrawn.

The stable outlook on API reflects S&P's expectation that the
company's debt leverage, which will likely be near 10x in 2019 due
to one-time transaction costs, will decrease significantly to
6.2x-6.6x in 2020. The rating agency expects credit ratios to
continue to improve as earnings increase due to growth in revenues
and reduced operating costs. Despite the expected improvements to
operations, S&P does not believe the financial sponsor would allow
debt leverage to remain below 5.0x for an extended period.

"We could lower the rating on API if we do not believe debt to
EBITDA will decline below 7.0x in 2020. This could be the result of
poor operating performance, which might be caused by failure to
recognize cost reductions, or significant debt-financed
acquisitions or dividends," S&P said.

"Although unlikely, we could raise the rating on API if debt to
EBITDA declines below 5.0x for an extended period and we believe
the company's private equity sponsor is committed to keeping it at
this level. This could be the result of continued operational
improvements that aid its cash inflows, and/or voluntary debt
repayments," S&P said.


APX GROUP: S&P Rates $250MM Senior Secured Notes 'B-'
-----------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B-' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating to APX Group Inc.'s (aka Vivint) $250 million
proposed senior secured notes due in 2024.

The '3' recovery rating indicates S&P's expectation for meaningful
recovery (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 55%) in the event of a payment
default. Vivint intends to use the proceeds to refinance a portion
of its 8.75% senior unsecured notes due in 2020.

"Our 'B-' issuer credit rating on Vivint reflects the company's
narrow focus, limited geographic diversification, and elevated
leverage while competing in the highly fragmented U.S. residential
alarm monitoring industry. Our expectations include, among other
things, company's substantial cash used as part of its customer
acquisition strategy, leveraging its vast product variety in the
growing smart home monitoring segment," S&P said. Partially
offsetting these risks is the recurring revenue model coupled with
strong subscriber growth trends, according to the rating agency.

  Ratings List
  APX Group Holdings Inc. (A/K/A Vivint)

  Issuer Credit Rating        B-/Stable/--
  
  New Rating
  APX Group Inc.

  Senior Secured
  US$250 mil Sr nts due 2024 B-
  Recovery Rating             3(55%)


ASPEN VILLAGE: Affiliate Taps Marcus & Millichap as Broker
----------------------------------------------------------
Aspen Village at Lost Mountain Memory Care, LLC seeks approval from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia to
hire a real estate broker.

The Debtor proposes to employ Marcus & Millichap Real Estate
Investment Services of Atlanta to market for sale its real property
located at 60 Hillside Trace, Dallas, Ga.

Marcus & Millichap will be paid a commission of 2.25 percent.

Anthony Williams, a real estate agent employed with Marcus &
Millichap, disclosed in court filings that he and other employees
of the firm are "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Anthony Williams
     Marcus & Millichap Real Estate
     Investment Services of Atlanta
     1100 Abernathy Road, NE, Suite 600
     Atlanta, GA 30328
     Tel: 678-808-2700

               About Aspen Village at Lost Mountain

Aspen Village at Lost Mountain Assisted Living, LLC and Aspen
Village at Lost Mountain Memory Care, LLC filed voluntary Chapter
11 petitions (Bankr. Case N.D. Ga. Nos. 19-40262 and 19-40263,
respectively) on Feb. 5, 2019.  Both operate assisted living
facilities in Georgia.

At the time of filing, both Debtors estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  The cases
are assigned to Judge Barbara Ellis-Monro.  The Debtors tapped
Leslie M. Pineyro, Esq., at Jones & Walden, LLC, as their legal
counsel.


ASPEN VILLAGE: Seeks to Hire Marcus & Millichap as Broker
---------------------------------------------------------
Aspen Village at Lost Mountain Assisted Living, LLC seeks approval
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia
to hire a real estate broker.

The Debtor proposes to employ Marcus & Millichap Real Estate
Investment Services of Atlanta to market for sale its real property
located at 135 Hillside Trace, Dallas, Ga.

Marcus & Millichap will be paid a commission of 2.25 percent.

Anthony Williams, a real estate agent employed with Marcus &
Millichap, disclosed in court filings that he and other employees
of the firm are "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Anthony Williams
     Marcus & Millichap Real Estate
     Investment Services of Atlanta
     1100 Abernathy Road, NE, Suite 600
     Atlanta, GA 30328
     Tel: 678-808-2700

               About Aspen Village at Lost Mountain

Aspen Village at Lost Mountain Assisted Living, LLC and Aspen
Village at Lost Mountain Memory Care, LLC filed voluntary Chapter
11 petitions (Bankr. Case N.D. Ga. Nos. 19-40262 and 19-40263,
respectively) on Feb. 5, 2019.  Both operate assisted living
facilities in Georgia.

At the time of filing, both Debtors had estimated assets of less
than $50,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

The cases have been assigned to Judge Barbara Ellis-Monro.  The
Debtors tapped Leslie M. Pineyro, Esq., at Jones & Walden, LLC, as
their legal counsel.


BAILEY'S EXPRESS: Plan Admin Taps Adrienne Woods as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
David Allen, the plan administrator appointed for Bailey's Express
Inc.'s bankruptcy estate, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Connecticut to hire The Law Offices of
Adrienne Woods, P.C. to collect a $30,012 judgment from Northern
Trucking & Logistics, LLC.

The court on March 13 entered default judgment in favor of Mr.
Allen after Northern Trucking failed to defend the complaint filed
by the plan administrator.  The complaint sought to recover
preferential payments made by the Debtor to Northern Trucking.

Adrienne Woods will receive 45% of the amount collected on the
judgment.  The firm will also receive reimbursement for
work-related expenses, which include filing fees. The expenses are
not expected to exceed $1,000.

The firm neither holds nor represents any interest adverse to the
Debtor and its bankruptcy estate, according to court filings.

Adrienne Woods can be reached through:

     Adrienne Woods, Esq.
     One Penn Plaza, Suite 6153
     New York, NY 10119
     Phone: +1 917-447-4321

                     About Bailey's Express Inc.

Headquartered in Middletown, Connecticut, Bailey's Express --
http://www.baileysxpress.com/-- is a Connecticut-based less than
truckload carrier. It provides service across the nation and is
dedicated in helping Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island
companies market their products throughout the U.S. including
Hawaii and Alaska. It has distribution points in Charlotte, Dallas,
Denver, Easton, Fontana, Indianapolis, Jacksonville, Memphis,
Neenah, Phoenix, Salt Lake City and Toledo.  It also provides
service to Mexico, Puerto Rico & Canada.

Bailey's Express filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D. Conn. Case No. 17-31042) on July 13, 2017, estimating its assets
and liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million.  The
petition was signed by David Allen, chief financial officer.

Judge Ann M. Nevins oversees the case.

Elizabeth J. Austin, Esq., and Jessica Grossarth Kennedy, Esq., at
Pullman & Comley, LLC, serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

No creditors' committee has been appointed in the case.

On January 12, 2018, the court confirmed the Debtor's Chapter 11
plan of liquidation.  Pursuant to the plan, David Allen was deemed
the plan administrator for the Debtor's estate.


BEYDA ADULT: Seeks to Hire Van Horn Law Group as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
The Beyda Adult Day Care Center, LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to hire Van
Horn Law Group, Inc. as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; represent the Debtor in negotiation with its
creditors in the preparation of a bankruptcy plan; and provide
other legal services in connection with its Chapter 11 case.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Chad Van Horn, Esq.     $450
     John Schank, Esq.       $350
     Associates              $350
     Jay Molluso             $300
     Law Clerks              $175
     Paralegals              $175

Van Horn Law Group has requested an initial retainer of $10,000,
plus the filing fee of $1,717.

Chad Van Horn, Esq., at Van Horn Law Group, disclosed in court
filings that he and his firm do not represent any interest adverse
to the Debtor and its bankruptcy estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Chad T. Van Horn, Esq.
     Van Horn Law Group, Inc.
     330 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 450  
     Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
     Phone: (954) 765-3166
     Email: Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

                About Beyda Adult Day Care Center

The Beyda Adult Day Care Center, LLC sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
19-14809) on April 12, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $100,000 and liabilities of less than
$1 million.  The case has been assigned to Judge Raymond B. Ray.


CABLE ONE: Moody's Lowers Ratings on 1st Lien Loans B1/B2 to 'Ba3'
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Cable One, Inc.'s Senior
Secured Bank Credit Facility to Ba3, from Ba2. Moody's also
downgraded the Company's Probability of Default Rating to B1-PD
from Ba3-PD due to the change in the Company's capital structure to
a fully secured capital structure.

Moody's assigned a Ba3 rating to the new 5-year, $1.050 billion
Senior Secured Credit Facility consisting of a $450 million Senior
Secured Delayed Draw Term Loan A (due 2024), a new $250 million
Senior Secured Term Loan A facility (due 2024), and a new $350
million Revolving Credit Facility (due 2024), which was upsized by
$150 million. Moody's also assigned a Ba3 to a new 7-year, $325
million Term Loan B-3 (due 2026). The proceeds of the transaction
will be used to repay its existing Term Loan A (with $238 million
outstanding) and redeem its outstanding 5.75%, $450 million Senior
Unsecured Notes (due 2022) on or after June 15, 2019 when the call
premium steps down, fund the Company's pending acquisition of
Fidelity Communications Co.'s data, video and voice business and
certain related assets, and for general corporate purposes. Moody's
will withdraw the ratings on the existing Revolving Credit
Facility, Term Loan A, and Senior Unsecured Notes upon completion
of the refinancing transaction. Moody's affirmed the Ba3 Corporate
Family Rating (CFR).

The Outlook is Stable and liquidity remains very good at SGL-1.

The transaction is credit negative. While the average borrowing
costs will be lower, the refinancing collapses the capital
structure to one class of secured debt eliminating the mixed
priority of claims and support previously provided by the unsecured
notes. As a result, the Senior Secured obligations were downgraded
one notch, in line with the CFR. Additionally, the protections for
the secured lenders have been weakened by amendments to the terms
of the new financing which slows the rate of debt repayment and
loosens certain covenants including the financial maintenance test,
debt incurrence limits, and the restricted payments baskets.

The refinancing also adds approximately $300 million in incremental
debt, assuming the Company fully draws on the delayed Term Loan A
at the close of the Fidelity acquisition scheduled during the
fourth quarter of 2019, subject to regulatory approvals and other
customary closing conditions. Moody's estimates 2018 pro forma
leverage (Moody's adjusted), with run-rate EBITDA for acquisitions,
would be near 3.25x (or .75x higher). This transaction, the third
in the last several years, underscores the event risk related to
the Company's appetite for debt-financed acquisitions.

Affirmations:

Issuer: Cable One, Inc.

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba3

Downgrades:

Issuer: Cable One, Inc.

  Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to B1-PD from
  Ba3-PD

  Senior Secured 1st lien Term Loan B1, Downgraded to Ba3
  (LGD3) from Ba2 (LGD3)

  Senior Secured 1st lien Term Loan B2, Downgraded to Ba3
  (LGD3) from Ba2 (LGD3)

Assignments:

Issuer: Cable One, Inc.

  Senior Secured Term Loan A, Assigned Ba3 (LGD3)

  Senior Secured 1st lien Delayed Draw Term Loan B3, Assigned
  Ba3 (LGD3)

  Senior Secured Delayed Draw Term Loan A, Assigned Ba3
  (LGD3)

  Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, Assigned Ba3
  (LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Cable One, Inc.

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Cable One, Inc.'s Ba3 Corporate Family Rating reflects the
Company's strong balance sheet and good liquidity, even after
recent acquisitions. Cable One's key credit metrics are investment
grade strength. The company also benefits from a wide footprint,
superior network speeds, a favorable competitive environment, and a
very profitable business model that produces EBITDA margins
approaching 50%. Constraining the rating is the Company's weak, and
declining video (and voice) services. Moody's expects continual
decline in the video business with subscriber losses greater 10%
annually, well above the average for the peer group. The service
offering is subject to intense competition and is being harvested
for cash and profits. The company's weakening market position in
video is reflected in below average operating performance metrics
including penetration rates, and earnings per home passed. In
addition, the Company's broadband-centric strategy is significantly
reducing the number of triple and double play customers,
eliminating bundling opportunities, increasing product
concentration and regulatory risks as the company moves closer to a
singular broadband-only business.

OUTLOOK

The stable outlook reflects its expectation that debt and revenue
will average approximately $1.8 billion and $1.3, respectively,
over the next 12-18 months. On the same basis, Moody's projects
EBITDA near $630 million, and free cash flow of $225 million.
Moody's expects CAPEX will be near 20% of revenue, leverage under
3x, and interest coverage will approach 5x. Free cash flow to debt
will be in the mid-teens percent range. Key operating assumptions
include organic broadband subscriber growth in the low single digit
percent range, and video subscriber losses of greater than -10%. It
expects Cable One to maintain very good liquidity (SGL-1), with
financial policies that remain balanced.

WHAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE

Moody's could consider an upgrade if leverage remained comfortably
below 3.0x (Moody's adjusted debt/EBITDA). An upgrade would also be
conditional on a significant decline in video subscriber losses
relative to broadband gains, and favorable changes in one or more
key credit factors including but not limited to liquidity, scale
and diversity, financial policies, market position, capital
structure, business model or key performance measures.

WHAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE

Ratings could be downgraded if leverage (Moody's adjusted
debt/EBITDA) is sustained above 4.0x. Moody's would also consider a
negative rating action if the credit profile deteriorated due a an
unfavorable change in one or more factors including but not limited
to liquidity, scale and diversity, financial policies, market
position, capital structure, business model or key performance
measures.

PROFILE

Headquartered in Phoenix, AZ, Cable One, Inc. offers traditional
and advanced video services including digital television,
video-on-demand, high-definition television, as well as high-speed
Internet access and phone service. The Company passes 2.1 million
homes, in 21 states across the West, Mid-West, and South (including
Arizona, Idaho, Illinois, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, and
Texas), serving approximately 804.9 thousand residential and
commercial customers. Revenue for the year ended 2018 was
approximately $1.1 billion.

On November 12, 2018, Cable One announced the acquisition of
Clearwave Communications, a broadband internet provider with a
high-capacity fiber network with dense regional coverage in
Southern Illinois. Clearwave has more than 2,400 route miles of
dense metro fiber infrastructure connecting approximately 2,700
on-net businesses, towers and data centers.

On April 1, 2019, Cable One announced the acquisition of Fidelity
Communications Co and its data, video and voice business and other
related assets, located in Sullivan Missouri, for $525.9 million in
cash. Fidelity serves Arkansas, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri,
Oklahoma, and Texas and passes approximately 190,000 homes and has
approximately 114,000 residential primary service units and 20,000
business PSUs. Fidelity has 5,100 network plant miles and over
1,600 fiber route miles. The transaction is subject to certain
regulatory approvals and other customer closing conditions, and is
scheduled to close during the fourth quarter of 2019.


CADIZ INC: TRF Master Intends to Nominate Five Directors
--------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13D/A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, these entities reported beneficial ownership of shares
of common stock of Cadiz Inc. as of April 19, 2019:

                                       Shares      Percent
                                    Beneficially     of
   Reporting Person                     Owned      Class
   ----------------                 ------------  ------------
Water Asset Management, LLC          3,258,219      12.8%
TRF Master Fund (Cayman) LP          3,258,219      12.8%
Anthony L. Arnerich                     39,300    Less Than 1%
John A. Bohn                               893    Less Than 1%
Jeffrey J. Brown                         3,718    Less Than 1%

The percentages are based upon a total of 25,454,266 shares of
Common Stock outstanding as of March 7, 2019, as reported in the
Issuer's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31,
2018, filed with the SEC on March 18, 2019.

Water Asset Management and TRF Master Fund used approximately
$30,000,320 (excluding brokerage commissions) in the aggregate to
purchase the shares of Common Stock reported as beneficially owned
by them in this Schedule 13D.  Funds for the purchase of the shares
of Common Stock as beneficially owned by the WAM Parties were
derived from the working capital of the funds and accounts under
Water Asset Management's management.

The shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Arnerich were
purchased with his personal funds in open market purchases. The
aggregate purchase price of the shares of Common Stock beneficially
owned by Mr. Arnerich is approximately $328,757, including
brokerage commissions.  Of the 893 shares of Common Stock
beneficially owned by Mr. Bohn, 500 shares of Common Stock were
purchased with his personal funds in open market purchases for
approximately $5,230, excluding brokerage commissions, and 393
shares of Common Stock were allocated to him for his services
rendered as a director of the Issuer.  All 3,718 shares of Common
Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Brown were allocated to him for his
services rendered as a director of the Issuer, with 3,325 of the
shares of Common Stock being allocated, at his election, in lieu of
cash compensation for those services.

On April 19, 2019, TRF Master Fund submitted to the Issuer a notice
of its intent to present a proposal and nominate candidates for
election as directors at the Issuer's 2019 annual meeting of the
stockholders.  The Notice stated TRF Master Fund's intention to
nominate five nominees-Anthony L. Arnerich, Alan L. Boyce, and
Scott D. Krase along with current directors of the Issuer John A.
Bohn and Jeffrey J. Brown for election as directors at the Annual
Meeting.  TRF Master Fund has nominated directors Bohn and Brown in
case the Issuer should fail to: (a) nominate one or both of them;
or (b) include one or both of them in the Issuer's proxy statement
and form of proxy card.  In addition, TRF Master Fund notified the
Issuer in the Notice that it intends to present a stockholder
proposal at the Annual Meeting to amend the Issuer's bylaws to
clarify the advance notice bylaw provision.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free at:
https://is.gd/chVFGU

                        About Cadiz

Founded in 1983, Cadiz Inc. -- http://www.cadizinc.com/-- is a
land and water resource development company with 45,000 acres of
land in three areas of eastern San Bernardino County, California.
Virtually all of this land is underlain by high-quality, naturally
recharging groundwater resources, and is situated in proximity to
the Colorado River and the Colorado River Aqueduct, California's
primary mode of water transportation for imports from the Colorado
River into the State.  The Company's properties are suitable for
various uses, including large-scale agricultural development,
groundwater storage and water supply projects. The Company's main
objective is to realize the highest and best use of its land and
water resources in an environmentally responsible way.

Cadiz Inc. reported a net loss and comprehensive loss of $26.27
million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss
and comprehensive loss of $33.86 million for the year ended  Dec.
31, 2017. As of Dec. 31, 2018, Cadiz had $69.30 million in total
assets, $155.54 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $86.24 million.


CASTILLO I PARTNERSHIP: Unsecureds to Get Payment in 5 Years
-------------------------------------------------------------
Castillo I Partnership, a California General Partnership, filed a
Chapter 11 plan and accompanying disclosure statement proposing
that general unsecured claims, classified in Class 11, are impaired
with total unsecured claims are $392,500 to $592,500.  To the
extent allowed, unsecured claims will be paid, within 5 years of
the Effective Date their pro rata share of the net assets of the
Debtor as of the Effective Date.  Net estate assets are estimated
to be approximately $147,675.

The plan will be funded by the following: Rental income and/or
contributions from Debtor's partners.

The hearing on the Disclosure Statement on May 15, 2019 at 10:00
a.m. in 302 of the Hon. Maureen Tighe 21041 Burbank Blvd. Woodland
Hills, CA 91367.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y6jay2bx from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorney for the Debtor is Mark E. Goodfriend, Esq., at Law Offices
of Mark E. Goodfriend, in Encino, California.

                 About Castillo I Partnership

Castillo I Partnership is a privately held partnership in Van Nuys,
California.

A sister company, M.N.E. Funding, Inc., sought bankruptcy
protection on Sept. 10, 2017 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-12420).

Castillo I Partnership, based in Van Nuys, CA, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-13341) on Dec. 18, 2017.  In
its petition signed by Ahron Zilberstein, general partner, the
Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.  The Hon. Martin R. Barash presides over the case.
Mark E. Goodfriend, Esq., at the Law Offices of Mark E. Goodfriend,
serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


COCRYSTAL PHARMA: Registers 1.7-Mil. Shares for Possible Resale
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. has filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission a Form S-3 registration statement relating to the
possible resale by certain selling stockholders of up to 1,686,494
shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.001 per share
which includes (i) 1,602,283 shares of common stock issued in a
private placement transaction, which closed on March 13, 2019 and
(ii) 84,211 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
warrants issued on May 3, 2018.  The Company registered these
shares of common stock (including the Warrant Shares) on behalf of
these Selling Stockholders, to be offered and sold by them from
time to time:

   * Connective Capital I QP LP
   * LSP Life Sciences Fund N.V.
   * Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund
   * Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund
   * A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners
   * Carmelo Cataudella
   * David Birenbaum
   * David Bocchi
   * Harry Ioannou
   * James Tang
   * Zachary Grodko
   * Zachary Hirsch

The Company is not selling any shares of common stock under this
prospectus and will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale
of shares of common stock by the Selling Stockholders.  However,
the Company may receive proceeds from the cash exercise of the
Warrants, which, if all Warrants are exercised, would result in
gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $176,000.

The Company is registering the offer and sale of the shares of its
common stock pursuant to certain registration rights granted to the
Selling Stockholders.  The registration of these shares does not
necessarily mean that any of the shares will be offered or sold by
the Selling Stockholders.  The timing and amount of any sale is
within the sole discretion of each Selling Stockholder.

The Selling Stockholders will pay all underwriting discounts and
selling commissions, if any, in connection with the sale of the
shares of common stock.  The Company has agreed to pay certain
expenses in connection with this registration statement and to
indemnify the Selling Stockholders against certain liabilities. To
the Company's knowledge, as of April 25, 2019, no underwriter or
other person has been engaged to facilitate the sale of shares of
common stock in this offering.

The Company's common stock is traded on The Nasdaq Capital Market
under the symbol "COCP."  On April 24, 2019, the last reported
sales price of the Company's common stock was $2.67 per share.

A full-text copy of the prospectus is available for free at:
https://is.gd/XTJiVQ

                   About Cocrystal Pharma

Cocrystal Pharma, Inc., formerly known as Biozone Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., is a clinical stage biotechnology company discovering and
developing novel antiviral therapeutics that target the replication
machinery of hepatitis viruses, influenza viruses, and noroviruses.
The company is headquartered in Tucker, Georgia.

Cocrystal Pharma incurred a net loss of $49.05 million in 2018,
following a net loss of $613,000 in 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018,
Cocrystal Pharma had $68.56 million in total assets, $1.67 million
in total liabilities, and $66.88 million in total stockholders'
equity.

BDO USA, LLP, in Miami, Florida, the Company's auditor since 2013,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated April 1,
2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations, negative cash flows from
operations and has an accumulated deficit that raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


COLLEEN & TOM: Seeks to Extend Exclusive Filing Period to Sept. 30
------------------------------------------------------------------
Colleen & Tom Enterprises, Inc. asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Nevada to extend the period during which it has the
exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 reorganization plan through
Sept. 30, and to confirm the plan through Dec. 31.

The company's current exclusive filing period is set to expire on
April 27.

The company said it needs more time to prepare a plan and
disclosure statement, adding that it has not yet determined how
much money will be available to pay its creditors due to
uncertainty as to whether the court will allow its inventory to be
sold at auction.

                 About Colleen & Tom Enterprises

Colleen & Tom Enterprises, Inc. -- http://cccfurnishings.com/--
offers new and gently used home furnishing products.  Colleen & Tom
Enterprises sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 18-16462) on Oct. 29, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Colleen Aiken, president, the Debtor estimated
assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  Judge Laurel E. Babero oversees the case.  The Debtor
tapped Leavitt Legal Services, P.C. as its legal counsel, and
Barlow Douglas and Hall, CPAs as its accountant.


CONCRETE PUMPING: S&P Affirms 'B' Rating on $397MM Term Loan
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B' issue-level rating on Concrete
Pumping Holdings Inc.'s $397 million first-lien term loan (which
includes a $40 million incremental term loan) due 2025 and revised
its recovery rating on the loan to '3' from '4'. The '3' recovery
rating indicates S&P's expectation for meaningful recovery
(50%-70%; rounded estimate: 55%) in the event of a payment
default.

The improvement in the recovery prospects for the term loan lenders
reflect the additional EBITDA contribution from the company's
pending acquisition of Capital Pumping, the second largest concrete
pumping provider in the U.S. (behind Concrete Pumping Holdings
Inc.). The recovery rating also benefits from the conservative
financing structure for the acquisition as Concrete Pumping will
finance close to 70% of the $135 million purchase price (including
transaction fees and expenses) with common equity and the remaining
$40 million with an incremental delayed draw term loan. Including
the Capital Pumping transaction, S&P expects the company's debt
leverage to fall below 6.5x in the 12 months following the close of
the acquisition. The $40 million incremental term loan is subject
to the successful completion of the Capital Pumping acquisition,
which it expects in the company's third quarter of fiscal 2019.

S&P's 'B' issuer credit rating and stable outlook on Concrete
Pumping Holdings Acquisition Corp. remain unchanged.

ISSUE RATINGS--RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors:

-- S&P's simulated default scenario envisions the company
defaulting in 2022 following an economic downturn and a significant
deterioration in its revenue and profits due to a substantial
decline in non-residential construction activity in the U.S.

-- S&P values the company on a going-concern basis using a 4.5x
multiple on the rating agency's projected emergence EBITDA of about
$56 million.

Simulated default assumptions:

-- The asset-based lending (ABL) revolving credit facility is 60%
drawn at default.

-- All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.

Simplified waterfall:

-- Gross recovery value: $253 million
-- Net recovery value after administrative expenses (5%): $240
million
-- Valuation split (obligors/nonobligors): 80%/20%
-- Estimated priority ABL facility claims: $37 million
-- Collateral value for first-lien term loan lenders: $186
million
-- First-lien secured debt claims: $353 million
-- Recovery expectations: 50%-70% (rounded estimate: 55%)

  Ratings List
  Concrete Pumping Holdings Acquisition Corp.

  Issuer Credit Rating B/Stable/--
  Ratings Affirmed; Recovery Ratings Revised  
                                    To    From
  Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.

  Concrete Pumping Merger Sub Inc.

  Senior Secured                    B    B
  Recovery Rating                   3(55%) 4(45%)


CONFLUENCE ENERGY: Chelemedo Buying Kremmling Property for $800K
----------------------------------------------------------------
Confluence Energy, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Colorado to authorize the sale of the real property and
improvements located thereat which constitute the manufacturing
plant located at 1809 Highway 9, Kremmling, Colorado, to Don
Chelemedo for $800,000.

The Debtor owns the Real Property.  The Debtor, pursuant to Order
of the Court, retained Pinnacle Real Estate Advisors to market the
Real Property.

The Real Property and Personal Property are subject to two secured
claims.  The first is the held by US Bank, National Association, in
its capacity as bond trustee in the amount of not less than $12
million.  The Real Property and Personal Property is further
secured by a statutory lien for taxes in favor of the Grand County
Treasurer.  The Grand County Treasurer has filed two Proofs of
Claim in the Bankruptcy Case asserting a lien upon the Debtor's
real and personal property located in Grand County.  The two Proofs
of Claim assert Claims in the cumulative amount of $151,771 for
person and real property taxes for tax years 2017 and 2018.

The first ProofofClaim asserts a Secured Claim in the amount
of$53,493.  The second Proofof Claim asserts a Secured Claim in the
amount of $98,278.  A comparison of the first Proof of Claim as
compared to the Second Proof of Claim appears to indicate that the
Claim asserted in the first Proof Claim is duplicated in the second
Proof of Claim.  The Debtor does not dispute the Grand County
Claims for real property taxes nor the personal property taxes for
2017.  It disputes the assessed 2018 personal property tax in the
amount of$27,371 as the Debtor did not operate in Grand County in
2018.

The Debtor and the Buyer have entered into a Contract to Buy and
Sell Real Estate (Commercial), subject to Court approval.

The principal terms of the Sale Agreement are:

     a. The purchase price for the Residence is $800,000, free and
clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances, with all liens, claims
and encumbrances will attach to the proceeds of the sale in the
order of their priorities.

     b. The Purchase Price will be paid through an earnest money
payment of $20,000, with the balance paid in cash at the closing.

     c. There is no financing contingency.

     d. There are standard due diligence contingencies, with the
time frames running in accordance with the deadlines in the Sale
Agreement.

     e. The Sale Agreement is for the purchase of the Real Property
and the Personal Property.

     f. The Sale Agreement is subject to Bankruptcy Court
approval.

     g. The Buyer may assign the Sale Agreement to another entity
controlled by the Buyer at his discretion, subject to the Debtor's
permission.

     h. The Buyer and Debtor will each pay one half of the closing
costs.

It is anticipated that the Buyer will be transferring the Sale
Agreement to a newly formed entity to run a business out of the
Real Property.  The Buyer's business will be in a different
business line than the Debtor and therefore will not compete with
the Debtor's Walden plant operations.  One or more of the following
insiders of the Debtor will have a minority ownership interest in
the Buyer's new business venture: Bruce Anderson, Adam Poe, Charley
Kurtz, and/or Mark Mathis. Accordingly, the Sale Agreement
contemplates an Operating Agreement in which one or more of these
insiders will be members will be entered into prior to a closing.

The Debtor asks authorization to utilize the proceeds from the sale
of the Real Property and Personal Property to pay the following:

     a. Closing and related costs associated with the sale;

     b. Real estate broker fees of 6% of the Purchase Price;

     c. Create a reserve in the full amount of Grand County's
asserted claim, which will be paid upon resolution of the dispute
over Grand County's claim.

     d. The balance, to the extent needed, will be paid to the Bond
Trustee to fully and finally pay the outstanding balance on the DIP
loan.

     e. Any remaining amounts will be held in an escrow account,
separate from any operating account of the Debtor, for distribution
under a plan of reorganization to be confirmed by the Debtor or as
otherwise ordered by the Court.

The sale of the Real Property and Personal Property will maximize
the return for the Debtor's creditors.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Confluence_Energy_122_Sales.pdf

                      About Confluence Energy

Confluence Energy, LLC, manufactures wood pellet for residential
and commercial heating use. Founded in 2008, the company provides
multiple types of products using biomass materials for a variety of
purposes. It is headquartered in Kremmling, Colorado.

Confluence Energy sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 18-17090) on Aug. 14,
2018. In the petition signed by Mark Mathis, managing member, the
Debtor disclosed $11,204,345 in assets and $14,949,092 in
liabilities.  Judge Elizabeth E. Brown oversees the case.  Aaron A.
Garber, Esq., at Buechler & Garber, LLC, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case.


CONSIS INTERNATIONAL: May 15 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
------------------------------------------------------------
The hearing to consider approval of the Disclosure Statement
explaining Consis International LLC's plan of reorganization will
be on May 15, 2019 at 10:30 a.m. United States Bankruptcy Court
299 E. Broward Boulevard, #301 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301.  The
deadline for objections to Disclosure Statement will be on May 8.

Class 3 consists of the allowed general unsecured claims including
Claims filed and  numbered #1 ,# 3, #4, #9 and #12 and the others
not listed as either disputed, contingent or  unliquidated in
Debtor's Schedule F. This class shall receive 93%. This class is
impaired by the Plan and its members are entitled to vote.

The Debtor will the Plan with funds collected from its accounts
receivables, cash in hand and funds received from its continued
operations. The Debtor will set aside sufficient funds for amounts
due pursuant to the plan as of the Effective Date. The
Administrative Claims not paid in full on the Effective Date will
be paid in installments after the Effective Date.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 4, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y2zbjh2cfrom PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                 About Consis International

Consis International LLC -- https://www.consisint.com/ -- provides
computer systems design and related services.  It was founded in
August 1987 in Caracas, Venezuela.

Consis International sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-22233) on Oct. 2,
2018.  In the petition signed by Oscar Carrera, manager, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  Judge John K. Olson presides over the
case.  Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., is the Debtor's
legal counsel.


CORNERSTAR WINE: Taps Kutner Brinen as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
Cornerstar Wine & Liquor LLC received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado to hire Kutner
Brinen, P.C. as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the preparation of a plan of
reorganization; and provide other legal services in connection with
its Chapter 11 case.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Lee Kutner          $550
     Jeffrey Brinen      $475
     Jenny Fujii         $380
     Keri Riley          $320
     Maureen Gerardo     $200
     Paralegal            $75

Kutner Brinen holds a pre-bankruptcy retainer for payment of
post-petition fees and costs in the amount of $1,818.58.  The
Debtor paid the firm its pre-bankruptcy fees and costs including
the filing fee in the amount of $2,253.

Lee Kutner, Esq., at Kutner Brinen, disclosed in court filings that
the firm is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Lee M. Kutner, Esq.
     Kutner Brinen, P.C.
     1660 Lincoln St., Ste. 1850
     Denver, CO 80264
     Tel: 303-832-2400
     Email: lmk@kutnerlaw.com

                  About Cornerstar Wine & Liquor

Cornerstar Wine & Liquor LLC is a distributor of wines, liquors and
beers based in Aurora, Colo.

Cornerstar Wine & Liquor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 19-12135) on March 22,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of less than $1 million and liabilities of between $1 million and
$10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Elizabeth E. Brown.


DENNIS JOHNSON II: Trustee Taps Rolston & Company as Appraiser
--------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Fluharty, Chapter 11 trustee for the bankruptcy estates of
Dennis Ray Johnson II and Sabbatical Inc., received approval from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of West
Virginia to hire Rolston & Company.

The firm will conduct an appraisal of certain real properties that
are the subject of a fraudulent conveyance action filed by the
trustee.

Darrell Rolston, an appraiser employed with Rolston & Company, has
agreed to provide appraisal services at the rate of $250 per hour.
He will charge $350 per hour for time spent on deposition and court
testimony.

Mr. Rolston neither holds nor represents any interest adverse to
the Debtors, according to court filings.

                     About Dennis Ray Johnson

Dennis Ray Johnson, II, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.
W.Va. Case No. 16-30227) on May 9, 2016, and was represented by
Christopher S. Smith, Esq., at Hoyer, Hoyer & Smith, PLLC.  In
January 2017, Mr. Johnson tapped Lewis Glasser Casey & Rollins PLLC
as new counsel.

Mr. Johnson is a businessman with ownership interests in at least
10 entities. He operates various rental real estate entities and
coal associated operations. Mr. Johnson is a member of each of the
following debtor companies -- Appalachian Mining and Reclamation,
LLC, DJWV1, LLC, DJWV2, LLC, Elkview Reclamation and Processing,
LLC, Green Coal, LLC, Joint Venture Development, LLC, Little
Kentucky Elk, LLC, Moussie Processing, LLC, Producer's Coal, Inc.,
Producer's Land, LLC, Redbud Dock, LLC, Southern Marine Services,
LLC, Southern Marine Terminal, LLC, and The Silo Golf Course, LLC
-- and has filed a motion asking the Bankruptcy Court to jointly
administer the bankruptcy cases.  Mr. Johnson is also a guarantor
of the debt for most of the companies.

On May 18, 2016, Sabbatical, Inc. sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Southern District of West Virginia
(Case No. 16-30247).  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had
estimated assets and liabilities of between $1 million and $10
million.  

On March 24, 2017, the court ordered that Sabbatical's bankruptcy
case be jointly administered with the case of Mr. Johnson.  

Mr. Johnson operated as a debtor-in-possession until Thomas
Fluharty was appointed Chapter 11 trustee on November 7, 2016.  The
trustee is represented by Joe M. Supple, Esq., at Supple Law Office
PLLC.


DRY EYE: Unsecured Creditors to Get $1,292 Monthly for 60 Months
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dry Eye Company, LLC, filed a combined disclosure statement and
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization providing that allowed general
unsecured creditors totaling $310,278 of which 25% of allowed
claim, $77,569.65, will be distributed over 60 months, for a
monthly payment of $1,292.83.

FC Marketplace, LLC, filed a Proof of Claim herein for $113,227.50,
as secured. The value of all assets at the time of filing was
$54,337.24, and First Home Bank has a first position lien.
Accordingly, this loan is wholly unsecured.  This lien shall be
stripped upon entry of an Order Confirming Plan.  The Creditor
shall have a general unsecured claim.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded through
the ongoing operations of the Debtor.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated April 10, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y3f6vj43 from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                    About Dry Eye Company

The Dry Eye Company, LLC filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D.
Wash. Case No. 18-12353), on June 14, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Rebecca E. Petris, managing member, the Debtor estimated $50,000
to $100,000 in assets and $100,000 to $500,000 in liabilities.  The
case has been assigned to Judge Christopher M. Alston.


DSN INC: $582K Sale of Carthage Property to Castleburys Approved
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas L. Perkins of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of Illinois authorized DSN, Inc.'s sale of the 82
acres of the real estate commonly known as 775 N. County Road 2600,
Carthage, Illinois, Part of NW & NE SW St Mary 4-5, to Elden and
Mary Lea Castlebury, and Alan, Lisa and Brian Castlebury, for
$582,200 ($7,100/acre).

The sale is not free and clear of liens and encumbrances, which
will be handled through the ordinary closing process.  After
payment of costs, including but not limited to the mortgage lien,
other liens of record, real estate taxes, closing costs and real
estate sales commissions, the Debtor does not expect to receive any
proceeds from the sale because its payoff balance on the multiple
cross-collateralized loans/mortgages is in excess of the sale
price.

                        About DSN, Inc.

DSN, Inc., based in Plymouth, IL, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D. Ill. Case No. 19-80320) on March 19, 2019.  In the
petition signed by Dennis Hellyer, president/manager, the Debtor
estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.
The Hon. Thomas L. Perkins oversees the case.  B. Kip Shelby,
Esq., at Rafool Bourne & Shelby, P.C., serves as bankruptcy counsel
to the Debtor.


EAST GRAND PREPARATORY, TX: S&P Alters Rev. Bond Outlook to Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook to stable from negative on
New Hope Cultural Education Finance Corp., Texas' series 2016A
tax-exempt revenue bonds and series 2016B taxable revenue bonds,
issued for Cityscape Schools Inc. d.b.a East Grand Preparatory
Academy (EGP). At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'BB+' rating on
the bonds.

"The outlook revision reflects our view of EGP's stronger maximum
annual debt service coverage following the implementation of
management's plan to shore up operations and reserves following
one-time expenses in fiscal 2017," said S&P Global Ratings credit
analyst Brian Marshall.

In light of EGP's material improvement in the school's full-accrual
operating performance in fiscal years 2018 and 2019 (projected),
and given EGP's historically positive financial margins, including
fiscal 2017, S&P believes that the recent material improvement in
maximum annual debt service coverage (MADS) coverage is more
reflective of a stable outlook.

"We assessed EGP's enterprise profile as adequate, characterized by
healthy demand with a solid waitlist, good academics, and an
experienced management team, which includes the recent hire of a
full-time chief financial officer with Texas charter school
experience. The enterprise profile is constrained by enrollment
levels that, while growing, remain under 1,000 students. We
assessed EGP's financial profile as vulnerable, characterized by a
high debt burden and improved, but lower, liquidity than that of
similarly rated peers," S&P said. The rating agency said its view
of EGP's financial profile is tempered, in part, by the actions
management has taken that resulted in significantly better MADS
coverage in fiscal 2018 and improved liquidity coupled with the
school's historically positive operating margins. S&P believes
that, combined, these credit factors lead to an indicative
stand-alone credit profile of 'bb'.

"As our criteria indicate, the final rating can be adjusted above
the indicative credit level due to a variety of overriding factors.
In our opinion, the 'BB+' rating on EGP's bonds better reflects the
school's favorable MADS coverage and healthy demand profile
compared to that of peers and medians, aided by EGP's status as a
school that has received multiple distinctions from the Texas
Education Agency (TEA) in addition to meeting standards," S&P
said.

The 'BB+' rating reflects S&P'sview of the school's:

-- Solid MADS coverage based on fiscal 2018 audited figures;

-- Healthy enterprise profile supported by positive enrollment
trends, in part due to the appeal of EGP's academic scores relative
to that of the local market and proximity and participation in the
economy of Dallas, a major metropolitan center;

-- Experienced management team (which includes the relatively
recent addition of a full-time in-house CFO about 16 months ago),
with strong education backgrounds; and

-- No additional debt plans in the near term.

Partly offsetting the above strengths, in S&P's opinion, are:

-- The school's high debt burden;

-- Liquidity that, while improved, remains inconsistent with the
rating level; officials are planning to continue building reserves
over the outlook horizon; and

-- Risk, as with all charter schools, that the school can be
closed for nonperformance of its charter or for financial distress
before final maturity of the bonds.

The series 2016 A and B bonds are secured by pledged revenues,
which are defined as all revenues or income derived from EGP, the
charter school operated by Cityscape Schools pursuant to the loan
agreement.

"The stable outlook reflects our opinion of EGP's improved
lease-adjusted MADS coverage relative to rating medians and peers.
We expect that the school's demand profile will continue to reflect
steady enrollment and good academics, appropriate for the rating
level and support financial operating results commensurate with
those of similarly rated peers," S&P said.

The rating agency said it could consider a negative rating action
should enrollment drop, MADS coverage materially weakens, or a
sustained draw on liquidity results in lower cash reserves compared
to that of similarly rated peers.

"Conversely, while not likely within our outlook horizon, we could
raise the rating following a sustained trend of maintaining MADS
coverage and liquidity at levels more in line with higher rated
credits," S&P said.


EVEN STEVENS: Seeks to Hire ESBE Stategic as Consultant
-------------------------------------------------------
Even Stevens Arizona, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Arizona to hire ESBE Stategic Partners,
Inc.

The firm will serve as management and financial consultant for Even
Stevens and its affiliates in their Chapter 11 cases.  The services
to be provided by the firm include corporate operations, investor
relations, capital formation and accounting services.

ESBE will be paid a management fee of $35,000 per month.

The Debtors disclosed in court filings that no conflict exists in
hiring the consultant.

                   About Even Stevens Arizona

Even Stevens -- https://evenstevens.com/ -- is a craft-casual
restaurant chain that specializes in sandwiches and salads.

Even Stevens Arizona LLC and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Lead Case No.
19-03235) on March 21, 2019.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors estimated assets and
liabilities as follows:

                            Estimated Assets        Estimated Debt
                            ----------------        --------------
Even Stevens Arizona           $0 to $50,000  $10-mil. to $50-mil.
Even Stevens Sandwiches  $1-mil. to $10-mil.   $1-mil. to $10-mil.
Even Stevens Utah              $0 to $50,000   $1-mil. to $10-mil.
Even Stevens Idaho             $0 to $50,000   $500,000 to $1-mil.

The cases are assigned to Judge Daniel P. Collins.  

Davis Miles McGuire Gardner, PLLC is the Debtors' legal counsel.


EW ACQUISITION: Case Summary Unsecured Creditor
-----------------------------------------------
Debtor: EW Acquisition, LLC.
        1801 Highway 35, North
        Wall, NJ 07719

Business Description: EW Acquisition is a Single Asset Real Estate
                      Debtor (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section
                      101(51B)), that owns a vacant land located
                      at 359 Princeton-Hightstown Road East
                      Windsor, NJ 08512.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 24, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of New Jersey (Trenton)

Case No.: 19-18271

Judge: Hon. Michael B. Kaplan

Debtor's Counsel: Eugene D. Roth, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF EUGENE D. ROTH
                  Valley Pk. East
                  2520 Hwy 35, Suite 307
                  Manasquan, NJ 08736
                  Tel: (732) 292-9288
                  Fax: (732) 292-9303
                  E-mail: erothesq@gmail.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Ronak Shah, managing member.

The Debtor lists Kishan Kansagra as its sole unsecured creditor
holding a claim of $1.2 million.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb19-18271.pdf


EXCO RESOURCES: May 3 Hearing on Disclosure Statement Approval
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Bankruptcy Court will convene a hearing on May 3, 2019, at 3:00
p.m., prevailing Central Time, to consider approval of the second
amended disclosure statement explaining the third amended
settlement Chapter 11 plan of Exco Resources, Inc., and its debtor
affiliates.

April 30, 2019, at 12:00 p.m., prevailing Central Time, will be the
deadline by which objections to the Disclosure Statement must be
filed with the Court. Service shall be completed upon filing.

Under the Third Amended Plan, holders of Allowed Convenience Claims
will receive their Pro Rata share of $1.1 million in Cash; provided
that, no Holder of an Allowed Convenience Claim shall receive a
distribution in excess of 20% of such Allowed Convenience Claim.
The prior Plan proposed a 25% recovery for holders of Allowed
Convenience Claims.

On the Effective Date, the Debtors will enter into the Exit RBL
Facility, with an initial borrowing base of $375 million with
approximately $250 million million drawn on the Effective Date.
Pursuant to the Amended Plan, all potential claims and Causes of
Action against the Insureds and the Settling Lenders will be
settled, and the Unsecured Claims Distribution Trust will prosecute
the Secured Claim Challenges against non-settling Holders of 1.5
Lien Notes Claims, 1.75 Lien Facilities Claims, and parties related
thereto.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement dated
April 17, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yyjvl7dl from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement dated
April 10, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y5c3fyxd from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtors are Christopher T. Greco, P.C., Esq., at
Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in New York; Patrick J. Nash, Jr., P.C.,
Esq., and Alexandra Schwarzman, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in
Chicago, Illinois; Marcus A. Helt, Esq., and Michael K. Riordan,
Esq., at Foley & Lardner LLP, in Houston, Texas.

                    About EXCO Resources

EXCO Resources, Inc. (otc pink:XCOO) --
http://www.excoresources.com/-- is an oil and natural gas
exploration, exploitation, acquisition, development and production
company headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with principal operations
in Texas, North Louisiana and the Appalachia region.  EXCO's
headquarters are located at 12377 Merit Drive, Suite 1700, Dallas,
Texas.

EXCO Resources, Inc., and 14 of its affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 18-30155) on Jan. 15,
2018.  EXCO disclosed total assets of $829.1 million and total debt
of $1.355 billion as of Sept. 30, 2017.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to the Honorable Marvin
Isgur.

The Debtors tapped Gardere Wynee Sewell LLP, and Kirkland & Ellis
LLP, as bankruptcy counsel; PJT Partners LP as financial advisor;
Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as restructuring advisor; and
Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC, as claims agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors.  The committee is represented by lawyers at
Jackson Walker LLP and Brown Rudnick LLP.  Intrepid Partners LLC
and Jefferies LLC serve as the committee's investment bankers.


FIRSTENERGY SOLUTIONS: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for May 20
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Alan M. Koschik of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Ohio scheduled a hearing on 9:30 a.m.
(prevailing Eastern Time) on May 20, 2019, at the John F.
Seilberling Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 260 U.S.
Courthouse, 2 South Main Street in Akron, Ohio, to consider
approval of the adequacy of the disclosure statement explaining the
fourth amended joint Chapter 11 plan of reorganization of
FirstEnergy Solutions Corporation and its debtor-affiliates.
Objections to the approval of the Debtors' disclosure statement, if
any, must be filed no later than 4:00 p.m. (prevailing Eastern
Time) on May 16, 2019.

The Court held the first day of hearings on the Motion on March 19,
2019.  Following
that hearing, on March 21, 2019, the Court entered a scheduling
order allowing parties to file supplemental briefs on the central
legal issue raised in most of the eleven responses to the Motion to
Approve the Disclosure Statement -- the legality of the proposed
nonconsensual third-party releases that the Plan would impose.

At the regularly scheduled omnibus hearing in this case on April 9,
2019, the Debtors
made an oral motion pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 8002(b)(1)(A) for
the Court to make
additional findings under Bankruptcy Rule 7052.  The Court held
that, "[d]ue to the breadth and ambiguity of the nonconsensual
third-party releases proposed in Section VIII.E. of the Plan, the
Court concludes that the Plan is patently unconfirmable under 11
U.S.C. Section 1123(b)(6), as that provision is applied in the
Sixth Circuit pursuant to Class Five Nev. Claimants, et al. v. Dow
Corning Corp. (In re Dow Corning Corp.), 280 F.3d 648 (6th Cir.
2002). Any solicitation of such Plan would be futile. Therefore,
the Motion is denied."

On April 18, the Debtors filed a Fourth Amended Chapter 11 Plan and
accompanying disclosure statement, a redlined version of which is
available at https://tinyurl.com/y4858w8g from PacerMonitor.com at
no charge.

As a result of the Court's rulings at a hearing held on April 4,
2019, FE Non-Debtor Parties have consented, subject to the
Bankruptcy Court's approval of the Consent and Waiver to remove
such nonconsensual FE third party releases from the Plan.

The Debtors propose a July 15 hearing to consider confirmation of
the Plan.

                About FirstEnergy Solutions Corp

Akron, Ohio-based FirstEnergy Solutions, Corp. (FES) is a
subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp (NYSE:FE). FES --
http://www.firstenergycorp.com/-- provides energy-related products
and services to retail and wholesale customers; and owns and
operates 5,381 MWs of fossil generating capacity through its
FirstEnergy Generation subsidiaries. FES also owns 4,048 MWs of
nuclear generating capacity through its FirstEnergy Nuclear
Generation subsidiary.  Nuclear generating plants are operated by
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC), which is a separate
subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp.

On March 31, 2018, FirstEnergy Solutions and 6 affiliates,
including FENOC, each filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ohio
Lead Case No. 18-50757).  The cases are pending before the
Honorable Judge Alan M. Koschik and their cases be jointly
administered under Case No. 18-50757.

Parent company, First Energy Corp. and its other subsidiaries,
including its regulated subsidiaries, are not part of the filing
and will not be subject to the Chapter 11 process.  First Energy
Corp. listed $42.2 billion in total assets against $4.07 billion in
total current liabilities, $21.1 billion in long-term debt and
other long-term obligations and $13.1 billion in non-current
liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2017.

The Debtors tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP as
bankruptcy
counsel; Brouse McDowell LPA as co-counsel; Lazard Freres & Co. as
investment banker; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as
restructuring advisor and Charles Moore as chief restructuring
officer; and Prime Clerk as claims and noticing agent.  The Debtors
also tapped Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP as special counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 9 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on April 12, 2018.  Milbank, Tweed, Hadley &
McCloy LLP and Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP serve as counsel to the
committee.


FLAMBEAUX GAS: U.S. Trustee Objects to Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------------
Dave W. Asbach, Acting United States Trustee for Region 5, objects
to the adequacy of the amended disclosure statement explaining
Flambeaux Gas & Electric Lights, L.L.C.'s amended Chapter 11 plan,
complaining of the overbroad release and exculpatory language that
is not permitted by the Fifth Circuit.

The U.S. Trustee further complains the Amended Disclosure
Statement, along with the Plan, contain injunction and exculpation
provisions that are overbroad, prohibited non-debtor third party
releases.

           About Flambeaux Gas & Electric Lights

Flambeaux Gas & Electric Lights L.L.C. sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No.
18-11979) on July 31, 2018, listing under $1 million in both assets
and liabilities.  Congeni Law Firm LLC, led by founding partner Leo
D. Congeni, is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


FLAMBEAUX GAS: Unsecureds to Get Full Payment Over 27 Quarters
---------------------------------------------------------------
Flambeaux Gas & Electric Lights, L.L.C., filed an amended Chapter
11 plan and accompanying amended disclosure statement disclosing
that holders of General Unsecured Trade Claims, classified in Class
4, with a total claim of $65,941, will be paid the full amount of
their Allowed Claim, with interest calculated at 5.75% per annum,
over seven years, payable in equal quarterly installments,
beginning on the first day of the first month of the first full
calendar quarter immediately  after the occurrence of the Effective
Date, and continuing for 27 quarters thereafter.

Payments under the Plan will be funded from the Quarterly Payments
paid by the Debtor to the Disbursement Agent, the $20,000 received
in exchange for settlement of the Avoidance Claims against the
Insiders, and Cash on hand as of the Effective Date.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated April 8,
2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y6lmnokt from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtor is Leo D. Congeni, Esq., at The Congeni Law
Firm, LLC, in New Orleans, Louisiana.

           About Flambeaux Gas & Electric Lights

Flambeaux Gas & Electric Lights L.L.C. sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No.
18-11979) on July 31, 2018, listing under $1 million in both assets
and liabilities.  Congeni Law Firm LLC, led by founding partner Leo
D. Congeni, is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


FRANKLIN ACQUISITIONS: Trustee Selling El Paso Property for $450K
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ronald E. Ingalls, the Chapter 11 trustee of Franklin Acquisitions,
LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of
Texas to authorize the sale of the real property, commonly known as
932 Cherry Hill, El Paso, Texas, also known as Lots 35 & Por 36,
Block 6, Coronado Country Club Estates, City of El Paso, Texas,
including improvements, to Bohannon Development Corp. or assigns
for $450,000.

The bankruptcy estate owns the Real Property, a single-family
residence with 5 bedrooms and 5.25 baths.  The house contains 5,847
sq. ft. and was constructed in 1960.   

The Trustee as the Seller and the Buyer have entered into a
Contract of Sale for the Property, subject to the Court's approval
for $450,000.  The El Paso County Appraisal District has valued the
property at $765,420.  The Debtor has scheduled the value of the
property at $765,420.

Following is information about the proposed sale:

      a. The name and address of the proposed Buyer or Lessee:
Bohannon Development Corp. or assigns, c/o Harrell Davis, 4695 N.
Mesa, El Paso, TX  79912

      b. The proposed consideration to be received by the estate,
including estimated costs of the sale or lease, including
commissions, auctioneer's fees, costs of document preparation and
recording and any other customary closing costs:

          - $450,000 sales price
          - 3% broker's commissions - $13,500
          - The Seller shall also pay for a title policy,
preparation of the deed and bill of sale, one-half of any escrow
fee and costs to record any documents to cure title objections that
Seller must cure.  Additionally, taxes will be pro-rated.

      c. A description of the estimated or possible tax
consequences to the estate, if known, and how any tax liability
generated by the use, sale or lease of such property will be paid:
Unknown

A preliminary title search and review of the Schedules and proofs
of claim filed in the case indicate the following liens, judgments,
and other claims may exist against the Real Property: (i)
unassessed ad valorem taxes owing to the City of El Paso for 2019;
(ii) deed of trust lien in favor of Deutsche Bank with a payoff of
$153,188 as of March 31, 2019; and (iii) judgment lien in favor of
Laura Lynch.  These liens will attach to the sale proceeds in the
order of priority. The Trustee proposes to pay the lien of Deutsche
Bank at closing.   The property will be sold subject to the liens
for 2019 ad valorem taxes.  

All liens, claims, interests and encumbrances will attach to the
proceeds from the sale to the same extent, priority and validity as
existed on the petition date.  

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Franklin_Acquisition_239_Sales.pdf

                  About Franklin Acquisitions

Franklin Acquisitions LLC is a privately-held company whose
principal assets are located at 932 Cherry Hill, El Paso, Texas.
Franklin Acquisitions sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 18-30185) on Feb. 6,
2018.  In the petition signed by William D. Abraham, member, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  

Judge H. Christopher Mott oversees the case.

Ronald E. Ingalls was appointed as the Chapter 11 trustee of
Franklin Acquisitions.  BARRON & NEWBURGER, P.C., serves as the
Trustee's counsel.


GABRIEL SAN ROMAN: $494K Sale of Hempstead Property Okayed
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert E. Grossman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of New York authorized Gabriel A. San Roman and
Michele D. San Roman to sell their interest in the real property
located at, and known as, 111 Cathedral Avenue, Hempstead, New York
to Robert Stewart and Janice Stewart for $494,000.

A hearing on the Motion was held on April 19, 2019.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims, and encumbrances.

The Debtors are authorized to do such things, execute such
documents, and expend such funds as may be necessary to consummate
the sale of the Real Property and effectuate the terms of the
Order.

Gabriel A. San Roman and Michele D. San Roman sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-77977) on Nov. 28, 2018.
The Debtors tapped Michael J. Macco, Esq., at Macco & Stern LLP, as
counsel.


GARDEN OAKS: Committee Amends Plan to Cap Transfer Fee at $1,500
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Garden Oaks
Maintenance Organization, Inc., filed a Second Amended Disclosure
Statement explaining its Chapter 11 Plan replacing the 0.75%
transfer fee with a transfer fee capped in the amount of $1,500
subject to annual increases of (i) up to 3% upon approval of the
Board, (ii) over 3% up to 10% upon approval of the members of the
Garden Oaks Homeowners Association at a meeting that has a quorum
of members present, or (iii) over 10% if owners of a majority of
the lots in the subdivision approve such increase.

The amount of general unsecured claims is estimated to range
between $250,000 and $1,000,000.  Pursuant to the Plan, all claims
that request a return of a transfer fee shall be automatically
reduced by $1,500, the proposed amount of the transfer fee under
the Plan. Such automatic reduction of the claims is estimated to
reduce the total amount of general unsecured claims by over
$500,000.

The Board will maintain a balance of no more than $100,000, subject
to an annual increase in the same percentage as the annual increase
of the Transfer Assessment ("Reserve") in readily available funds
as a reserve for the Organization's operation, administrative,
legal, enforcement, and other appropriate expenses.

A redlined version of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement dated
April 8, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y2n94rb5 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel to the Committee are Charles M. Rubio, Esq., and Michael D.
Fritz, Esq., at Diamond McCarthy LLP, in Houston, Texas.

         About Garden Oaks Maintenance Organization

Garden Oaks Maintenance Organization, Inc., sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No.
18-60018) on April 11, 2018.  In the petition signed by Mark
Saranie, president, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $1
million and liabilities of less than $1 million.  

Judge David R. Jones presides over the case.  Johnie J. Patterson,
Esq., at Walker & Patterson, P.C., serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.  

On May 31, 2018, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.


GLANSAOL HOLDINGS: Directed to Revise Plan, Disclosures
-------------------------------------------------------
The Bankruptcy Court, on April 24, denied Glansaol Holdings Inc.,
et al.'s motion to schedule a combined hearing to consider the
adequacy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement and confirm the
Second Amended joint Chapter 11 plan of liquidation.

At the April 24 hearing, the Court outlined its reservations about
whether combining the two hearings would be appropriate under the
circumstances and noted certain alterations that would need to be
made to the Disclosure Statement and the Liquidating Plan before
the Court could approve them.  Accordingly, for the reasons stated
on the record at that hearing, the Motion is denied.  The denial
will not prejudice the ability of the Debtors to seek approval of
revised solicitation and objection procedures following the Court's
approval of an amended Disclosure Statement.  The Debtors were
directed to amend the Disclosure Statement and the Plan to reflect
the comments made by the Court at the April 24 hearing.

After extensive discussions and negotiations among the Debtors' and
the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors' financial advisors,
the parties agreed to the proposed Allocation Schedule, with the
consent of the Sponsor, as part of the Global Settlement.  The
Allocation Schedule addresses the allocation of Plan Funding among
the Debtors.  The agreed-upon methodology summarily splits the
purchase price for the Debtors' assets among the Debtors' four
operating entities -- Laura Geller Beauty, LLC, Julep Beauty, Inc.,
Clark’s Botanicals, Inc., and Glansaol Management LLC -- based on
the shareholder equity on each respective Debtor's balance sheet as
of the Petition Date.  The Sponsor Settlement Amount was split
among only Laura Geller Beauty, LLC, Julep Beauty, Inc., and
Clark's Botanicals, Inc. based on their respective percentages of
shareholder equity as of the Petition Date.

The Committee has selected Charles Berk as Plan Administrator.  The
Plan Administrator Agreement will be filed with the Plan
Supplement.  The Plan Administrator may retain advisors, which may
include CBIZ Accounting, Tax & Advisory of New York, LLC as
financial advisor and Arent Fox LLP as counsel.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement dated
April 23, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yxv58k5c from
Omni Management at no charge.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated April
10, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y2os6lbl from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtors are Brian S. Lennon, Esq., Daniel I.
Forman, Esq., and Andrew S. Mordkoff, Esq., at Willie Farr &
Gallagher LLP, in New York.

                  About Glansaol Holdings

Headquartered in New York, Glansaol Holdings Inc. and its
subsidiaries are an independent prestige beauty and personal care
companies.

On Dec. 19, 2018, Glansaol Holdings Inc. and seven of its
subsidiaries filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Lead Case No. 18-14102).  Glansaol estimated assets and liabilities
of $10 million to $50 million.

The Debtors tapped Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP as legal counsel;
Emerald Capital Advisors as financial advisor; and Omni Management
Group Inc. as claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Dec. 28, 2018.  The committee tapped Arent
Fox LLP as its counsel, and CBIZ Accounting, Tax and Advisory of
New York, LLC, as its financial advisor.


GLOBAL EAGLE: Incurs $236.6 Million Net Loss in 2018
----------------------------------------------------
Global Eagle Entertainment Inc. had filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K reporting a net
loss of $236.59 million on $647.09 million of total revenue for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $357.11 million
on $619.46 million of total revenue for the year ended Dec. 31,
2017.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had $717.08 million in total
assets, $943.42 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $226.33 million.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, the Company's principal sources of liquidity
were its unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $39.2 million,
which primarily are invested in cash and money market funds in
banking institutions in the U.S., Canada and Europe and to a lesser
extent in Asia Pacific.  This represents a decrease of $9.1 million
from $48.3 million as of Dec. 31, 2017.  The Company's long-term
debt balance (inclusive of the current portion) increased from
$619.1 million at Dec. 31, 2017 to $709.6 million at Dec. 31, 2018,
due to its second lien notes issued to Searchlight in the aggregate
amount of $128.2 million, net of discounts.  As of Dec. 31, 2018,
the Company had $509.3 million, net of discounts, in term and
revolving loans outstanding, and $70.4 million, net of discounts,
in aggregate convertible loans, as well as other debt outstanding
of $1.7 million.

As of and for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had a
working capital deficiency of $20.4 million and negative cash flows
from operating activities of $74.1 million, primarily due to a net
loss of $236.6 million.  The Company's cash flows from operating
activities are significantly affected by its investments in
operations, including working capital and corporate infrastructure
to support its ability to generate revenue and conduct operations
through cost of services, product development, sales and marketing
and general and administrative activities.

Cash used in investing activities has historically been, and is
expected to be, impacted significantly by the Company's investments
in its platform, its infrastructure and equipment for its business
offerings and investment in our information technology systems.
Cash provided by financing activities has been significantly
impacted by the Company's refinancing of legacy EMC indebtedness
with the 2017 Credit Agreement during the year ended Dec. 31, 2017
and the issuance of the Second Lien Notes during the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018.  Historically, cash used for financing activities
included repurchases of its common stock, warrant repurchases, and
the repayment of debt.  During the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, cash
provided by financing activities has been used to fund its
operating losses as its operating and investing cash flows were
negatively impacted by incremental working capital needs and
increased capital expenditures as the Company continues to
restructure its operations and ramp up its business for both new
customer wins and volume and capacity growth with its existing
customers.

Global Eagle said "In an effort to lower our operating expenses, we
have been implementing an operating expense savings initiative,
which includes global footprint consolidation, simplification of
our management structure, additional cost controls, IT programs
that will increase efficiency and automation, and other operating
expense reductions.  In connection with this initiative, in
February 2019, we committed to reduce our global workforce by
approximately 15%.  The changes to our workforce will vary by
country, based on legal requirements and required consultations
with works councils and other employee representatives, as
appropriate.  We estimate that we will generate approximately $20
million in annual savings and will incur total expenses relating to
the workforce reduction of approximately $4.5 million, all of which
represents cash expenditures relating to severance and
transition-related expenses.  Of this total amount, we expect to
record substantially all of the expense in the first quarter of
2019, with the remaining amounts to follow in the second and third
quarters of 2019.

"We expect our available cash balances and cash flows from
operations (combined with any availability under the revolving
credit facility under the 2017 Credit Agreement) to provide
sufficient liquidity to fund our current obligations and projected
working-capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least
the next 12 months.  To strengthen our current liquidity position
and to fund our ongoing operations and/or enable us to invest in
new business opportunities, we may implement additional cost
reduction initiatives and/or raise additional funds through asset
sales, commercial financings and new revolving and term-loan
facilities and through the issuance of bonds, debentures, notes and
equity and equity-linked securities (in public or private
offerings).  However, market conditions, our future financial
performance and our history of delays in filing our periodic SEC
reports, among other factors, may make it difficult or impossible
for us to access debt or equity sources of capital, on favorable
terms or at all, should we determine in the future to raise
additional funds through these methods.

"The assessment by management that we will have sufficient
liquidity to fund current obligations and projected working-capital
and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12
months from the date of filing this Form 10-K is based on
underlying estimates and assumptions, including that we: (i) remain
current in our SEC public-reporting obligations; (ii) service our
indebtedness and comply with the covenants (including the financial
reporting covenants) in the agreements governing our indebtedness;
and (iii) remain listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market.  We are
currently in compliance with all financial and non-financial
covenants under the 2017 Credit Agreement and the ongoing listing
requirements of The Nasdaq Stock Market."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-K is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/tG7Fvl

                      About Global Eagle

Headquartered in Los Angeles, Californi, Global Eagle --
www.GlobalEagle.com -- is a provider of media, content,
connectivity and data analytics to markets across air, sea and
land.  Global Eagle offers a fully integrated suite of rich media
content and seamless connectivity solutions to airlines, cruise
lines, commercial ships, high-end yachts, ferries and land
locations worldwide.  The Company has approximately 1,200 employees
and 50 offices on six continents.

                          *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on April 16, 2019, S&P Global Ratings
lowered all ratings on Global Eagle Entertainment Inc., including
the ICR to 'CCC', to reflect its view that the company is currently
vulnerable to nonpayment over the next 12 months and is dependent
on favorable business, financial, and economic conditions to meet
its financial commitments.


GNC HOLDINGS: Incurs $15.3 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
GNC Holdings, Inc. reported consolidated revenue of $564.8 million
in the first quarter of 2019, compared with consolidated revenue of
$607.5 million in the first quarter of 2018.  The decrease in
revenue was primarily a result of the transfer of the Nutra
manufacturing and China e-commerce businesses to the newly formed
joint ventures and the closure of company-owned stores from our
store portfolio optimization strategy.

Key Updates

  * Integration of the recently announced joint ventures with
    Harbin Pharmaceutical Group and International Vitamin
    Corporation currently on track with expectations

  * Retired legacy B-1 Term Loan on March 4th and reduced the
    extended B-2 Term Loan during the first quarter of 2019 by
    $114 million.  In aggregate, retired over $350 million in
    debt since beginning of fourth quarter of 2018.

  * Ended first quarter with $211 million in liquidity

  * Recently launched CBD topical products in 23 states and the
    District of Columbia

  * GNC brand mix increased to 52% compared with 50% in the first
    quarter of 2018

For the first quarter of 2019, the Company reported a net loss of
$15.3 million compared with net income of $6.2 million in the prior
year quarter.  Diluted loss per share was $0.23 in the current
quarter compared with diluted earnings per share ("EPS") of $0.07
in the prior year quarter.  In the first quarter of 2019, the
Company recorded a $16.8 million loss on forward contracts related
to the issuance of convertible preferred stock as a result of the
Harbin investment and a $19.5 million loss on the exchange of net
assets for the newly formed joint ventures. In the prior year
quarter the Company recorded a $16.7 million loss on debt
refinancing.  Excluding certain items and other expenses, adjusted
net income was $19.0 million in the current quarter, compared with
adjusted net income of $20.1 million1 in the prior year quarter.
Adjusted EPS was $0.15 in the current quarter compared with $0.24
in the prior year quarter.

Adjusted EBITDA was $65.9 million, or 11.7% of revenue in the
current quarter compared with $59.3 million, or 9.8% of revenue in
the prior year quarter.

"We are pleased with the EBITDA margin improvement we delivered in
the first quarter of 2019," said Ken Martindale, GNC's chairman and
CEO.  "During the past six months we have completed a number of
important partnerships, including the strategic investment by
Harbin and the joint ventures with Harbin and IVC, which further
enable our team to focus on our core business.  In addition, during
that period, we have improved our balance sheet by retiring over
$350 million in debt."

Segment Operating Performance

U.S. & Canada

Revenues in the U.S. and Canada segment decreased $23.2 million, or
4.5%, to $489.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019
compared with $512.4 million in the prior year quarter.  E-commerce
sales were 7.4% of U.S. and Canada revenue for the three months
ended March 31, 2019 compared with 7.1% in the prior year quarter.

The decrease in revenue compared with the prior year quarter was
primarily due to the closure of company-owned stores under our
store portfolio optimization strategy, which contributed an
approximate $14 million decrease in revenue, and negative same
store sales of 1.6%, which resulted in a revenue decrease of $6.2
million.  In domestic franchise locations, same store sales for the
first quarter of 2019 increased 0.6% over the prior year quarter.

Operating income increased $8.6 million to $52.1 million, or 10.7%
of segment revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2019
compared with $43.5 million, or 8.5% of segment revenue, for the
same period in 2018.  The increase in operating income percentage
was due to lower occupancy and marketing costs, partially offset by
a decrease in product margin rate.

International

Revenues in the International segment increased $0.8 million, or
2.1%, to $40.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019
compared with $40.1 million in the prior year quarter, primarily
due to an increase in sales to the Company's international
franchisees of $4.6 million partially offset by a decline in China
sales of $3.4 million to $4.5 million mostly due to the transfer of
the cross-border e-commerce China business to the newly formed
joint venture effective February 13, 2019.

Operating income decreased $0.4 million to $14.1 million, or 34.3%
of segment revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2019
compared with $14.5 million, or 36.1% of segment revenue, for the
same period in 2018.  The decrease in operating income percentage
was primarily due to a lower margin rate driven by a change in
revenue mix.

Manufacturing / Wholesale

Revenues in the Manufacturing / Wholesale segment, excluding
intersegment sales, decreased $20.4 million, or 37.0%, to $34.7
million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 compared with
$55.1 million in the prior year quarter primarily due to the
transaction with IVC for the newly formed manufacturing joint
venture effective March 1, 2019.

Operating income increased $0.3 million to $15.3 million, or 21.9%
of segment revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2019
compared with $15.0 million, or 12.5% of segment revenue, in the
prior year quarter.  The increase in operating income percentage
was primarily due to a decrease in revenues as a result of the
newly formed manufacturing joint venture.  Although revenue
decreased, the operating income reduction was minimal as GNC
continues to recognize margin on product sold in March, but
purchased prior to the formation of the joint venture.  The
remaining increase in operating income is the result of an increase
in GNC brand sales.

Cash Flow and Liquidity Metrics

For the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company generated
net cash from operating activities of $68.7 million compared with
$25.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018.  The
increase was driven by favorable working capital changes primarily
due to an increase in accounts payable as a result of the Company's
cash management efforts and an increase in accounts payable related
to the establishment of the manufacturing joint venture.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company generated
$154.3 million in free cash flow which includes $101 million
proceeds from the Nutra manufacturing transaction, compared with
$37.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018.  The
Company defines free cash flow as cash provided by operating
activities (excluding fees relating to the debt refinancing) less
cash used in investing activities.  At March 31, 2019, the
Company's cash and cash equivalents were $137.1 million and debt
was $888.4 million.  No borrowings were outstanding on the
Revolving Credit Facility at the end of the first quarter of 2019.

A full-text copy of the press release is available for free at:

                       https://is.gd/RTJreP

                        About GNC Holdings

GNC Holdings, Inc., headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA, is a global
specialty retailer of health, wellness and performance products,
including protein, performance supplements, weight management
supplements, vitamins, herbs and greens, wellness supplements,
health and beauty, food and drink and other general merchandise.

As of March 31, 2019, GNC had approximately 8,200 locations, of
which approximately 6,000 retail locations are in the United States
(including approximately 2,100 Rite Aid licensed
store-within-a-store locations) and the remainder are franchise
locations in approximately 50 countries.

GNC Holdings reported net income of $69.78 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $150.26 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, GNC Holdings
had $1.52 billion in total assets, $1.54 billion in total
liabilities, $98.80 million in Series A convertible preferred
stock, and a stockholders' deficit of $114.31 million.

                           *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on Nov. 15, 2018, S&P Global Ratings
affirmed its 'CCC+' issuer credit rating on Pittsburgh-based
vitamin and supplement retailer GNC Holdings Inc. and removed all
of its ratings on the company from CreditWatch, where S&P placed
them with negative implications on Feb. 14, 2018.  "The affirmation
reflects our belief that GNC's capital structure remains
unsustainable over the long term in light of its current operating
performance, including its cash flow generation, because of
increased competitive threats amid the ongoing secular changes in
the retail industry.


GOGO INC: Issues $905 Million 9.875% Senior Secured Notes
---------------------------------------------------------
Gogo Intermediate Holdings LLC, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of
Gogo Inc., and Gogo Finance Co. Inc., an indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of Gogo, have issued $905 million aggregate principal
amount of their 9.875% senior secured notes due 2024 under an
Indenture, dated as of April 25, 2019, among the Issuers, Gogo, as
guarantor, certain subsidiaries of the Company, as guarantors, and
U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee and as collateral
agent.

Interest on the Notes will accrue at the rate of 9.875% per annum
and will be payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November
1, commencing on Nov. 1, 2019.  The Notes mature on
May 1, 2024.

The Issuers used a portion of the net proceeds from the issuance of
the notes to fund the redemption of all of the outstanding existing
notes.  The Issuers intend to use the remaining net proceeds for
general corporate purposes, including the repurchase, retirement or
repayment of Gogo's 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020.

                        Notes Redemption

On April 15, 2019, the Issuers elected to call for redemption in
full all $690 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of the
existing notes in accordance with the terms of the existing notes
indenture.  The redemption was conditioned, among other things,
upon the incurrence of indebtedness in connection with the offering
of the notes or from one or more other sources, in an amount
satisfactory to the Issuers.  On April 25, 2019, the Issuers
irrevocably deposited, or caused to be irrevocably deposited, with
the Trustee funds solely for the benefit of the holders of the
existing notes, cash in an amount sufficient to pay principal,
premium, if any, and accrued interest on the notes to, but not
including, the date of redemption and all other sums payable under
the existing notes indenture.  The Trustee executed and delivered
an acknowledgement of satisfaction, discharge and release, dated as
of April 25, 2019, among other documents, with respect to the
satisfaction and discharge of the existing notes.

                      Supplemental Indenture

Gogo Intermediate and Gogo Finance entered into a second
supplemental indenture on April 25, 2019 to the indenture governing
the Issuers' 12.500% Senior Secured Notes due 2022, dated as of
June 14, 2016, among the Issuers, the guarantors, and U.S. Bank
National Association, as trustee and as collateral agent, as
amended by the first supplemental indenture, dated as of Sept. 20,
2017, among the Issuers, the guarantors and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee.  A copy of the Second Supplemental
Indenture is available for free from the Securities and Exchange
Commission's website at https://is.gd/cTgwZo.
                      
                          About Gogo

Gogo Inc. -- http://www.gogoair.com-- is a global provider of
broadband connectivity products and services for aviation.  The
Company designs and sources innovative network solutions that
connect aircraft to the Internet and develop software and platforms
that enable customizable solutions for and by its aviation
partners.  Gogo's products and services can be found on thousands
of aircraft operated by global commercial airlines and thousands of
private aircraft, including those of the largest fractional
ownership operators.  Gogo is headquartered in Chicago, IL, with
additional facilities in Broomfield, CO, and locations across the
globe.

Gogo reported a net loss of $162.03 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $172.0 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, Gogo Inc. had $1.26
billion in total assets, $1.53 billion in total liabilities, and a
total stockholders' deficit of $268.8 million.

                       *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on April 18, 2019, Moody's Investors Service
changed the outlook on Gogo Inc. to stable from negative.
Concurrently, Moody's has affirmed Gogo's corporate family rating
at Caa1.  Moody's said that despite the improvement in liquidity,
Gogo's Caa1 CFR remains warranted given the company's high leverage
which Moody's expects at around 9.9x (Moody's adjusted debt/EBITDA)
by end 2019 along with the continued need for Gogo to invest
heavily in technology and equipment installs to pursue its growth
ambitions outside of North America.  Gogo's Caa1 also reflects the
company's small scale relative to other players in the wider
telecommunications industry as well as the highly competitive
environment it operates in.

S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'CCC+' issuer credit rating on Gogo
Inc, according to a TCR report dated April 19, 2019.  S&P said the
company's proposed refinancing of its capital structure will boost
its short-term liquidity by extending the maturity profile of its
obligations but the rating agency expects the company to burn cash
over the next year.  The rating agency said it affirmed its 'CCC+'
issuer credit rating because it does not envision a default within
the next year.


GOGO INC: Satisfies Financing Condition for Tender Offer
--------------------------------------------------------
Gogo Inc. has determined that the consummation of the offering and
sale of $905 million aggregate principal amount of 9.875% senior
secured notes due 2024 by Gogo Intermediate Holdings LLC, the
Company's direct wholly owned subsidiary, and Gogo Finance Co.
Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings LLC and the
Company's indirect wholly owned subsidiary, satisfies the financing
condition to its previously announced cash tender offer for any and
all of its outstanding 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020.

The complete terms and conditions of the Tender Offer are set forth
in the Amended Offer to Purchase and related Amended Letter of
Transmittal.  Copies of the Amended Offer to Purchase and Amended
Letter of Transmittal may be obtained from the Information Agent
for the Tender Offer, D.F. King & Co., Inc., by calling (866)
796-1290 (toll-free), (212) 269-5550 (collect) or by email at
gogo@dfking.com.

J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC are acting
as the dealer managers for the Tender Offer.  Questions regarding
the Tender Offer may be directed to J.P. Morgan Securities LLC at
(800) 261-5767 or Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC at (855) 483-0952.

                          About Gogo

Gogo Inc. -- http://www.gogoair.com/-- is a global provider of
broadband connectivity products and services for aviation.  The
Company designs and sources innovative network solutions that
connect aircraft to the Internet and develop software and platforms
that enable customizable solutions for and by its aviation
partners.  Gogo's products and services can be found on thousands
of aircraft operated by global commercial airlines and thousands of
private aircraft, including those of the largest fractional
ownership operators.  Gogo is headquartered in Chicago, IL, with
additional facilities in Broomfield, CO, and locations across the
globe.

Gogo reported a net loss of $162.03 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $172.0 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, Gogo Inc. had $1.26
billion in total assets, $1.53 billion in total liabilities, and a
total stockholders' deficit of $268.8 million.

                           *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on April 18, 2019, Moody's Investors Service
changed the outlook on Gogo Inc. to stable from negative.
Concurrently, Moody's has affirmed Gogo's corporate family rating
at Caa1.  Moody's said that despite the improvement in liquidity,
Gogo's Caa1 CFR remains warranted given the company's high leverage
which Moody's expects at around 9.9x (Moody's adjusted debt/EBITDA)
by end 2019 along with the continued need for Gogo to invest
heavily in technology and equipment installs to pursue its growth
ambitions outside of North America.  Gogo's Caa1 also reflects the
company's small scale relative to other players in the wider
telecommunications industry as well as the highly competitive
environment it operates in.

S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'CCC+' issuer credit rating on Gogo
Inc, according to a TCR report dated April 19, 2019.  S&P said the
company's proposed refinancing of its capital structure will boost
its short-term liquidity by extending the maturity profile of its
obligations but the rating agency expects the company to burn cash
over the next year.  The rating agency said it affirmed its 'CCC+'
issuer credit rating because it does not envision a default within
the next year.


GOURMET EXPRESS: $8.5K Sale of All Remnant Assets to Oak Point OK'd
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Nancy V. Alquist of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland authorized Gourmet Express Acquisition Fund,
LLC, Gourmet Express Holdings, LLC and Gourmet Express, LLC to sell
their all remnant assets to Oak Point Partners, LLC for $8,500.

The sale is free and clear of liens, claims, interests and
encumbrances, with such liens, claims, interests, and encumbrances
to attach to the proceeds of the Sale.

The 14-day stay under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) is waived.

The sale of the Remnant Assets constitutes an action taken by the
Debtors in furtherance of the Wind-Down Plan prior to the entry of
the Dismissal Order, which action was authorized and ratified upon
entry of the Dismissal Order.

            About Gourmet Express Acquisition Fund

Gourmet Express Acquisition Fund, LLC, and its three affiliates
sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Md., Case No.
15-13670) on March 16, 2015.  The case is assigned to Judge Nancy
V. Alquist.  The Debtors' counsel is Dennis J. Shaffer, Esq., at
Whiteford, Taylor, & Preston, LLP, in Baltimore, Maryland.  Traxi,
LLC, Serves as the Debtors' financial advisor.


GRAND AVENUE 364: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
---------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Grand Avenue 364 Estates LLC
        3611 14 Avenue, Unit 600
        Brooklyn, NY 11218

Business Description: Grand Avenue 364 is a privately held
                      company that is engaged in activities
                      related to real estate.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 24, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn)

Case No.: 19-42443

Judge: Hon. Nancy Hershey Lord

Debtor's Counsel: Solomon Rosengarten, Esq.
                  SOLOMON ROSENGARTEN
                  1704 Avenue M
                  Brooklyn, NY 11230-5423
                  Tel: (718) 627-4460
                  Fax: (718) 627-4456
                  E-mail: VOKMA@aol.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Shlomo Sinay, member.

The Debtor failed to submit a list of its 20 largest unsecured
creditors at the time of the filing.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb19-42443.pdf


GREENTECH AUTOMOTIVE: Auction Sale of All Assets Approved
---------------------------------------------------------
GreenTech Automotive, Inc., and WM Industries Corp. filed a notice
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
of their proposed sale of substantially all their assets to Encore
Wealth Investments Ltd. for $8 million in cash plus the waiver of
the rights of investors in the Purchaser to receive distributions
on account of claims asserted against the Debtors in their Chapter
11 cases, subject to overbid.

On March 4, 2019, the Debtors filed their Bid Procedures Motion
requesting entry of an order: (a) approving bid procedures for the
sale of substantially all assets, including (i) all real and
personal property owned by GTA, including the Mississippi Parcel,
(ii) the JSAT Interest, (iii) litigation claims, if any, that
exist, and have not been settled or released, as of the Closing
Date, (iv) all assets of Gulf Coast Funds Management, LLC, which is
a wholly owned subsidiary of WMIC, and (v) all Accounts Receivable,
Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Licenses and all other
tangible or intangible assets of the Debtors; (b) authorizing an
auction to sell the Assets; (c) approving certain deadlines and the
form, manner and sufficiency notice of the foregoing; and (d)
granting other related relief.

On March 19, 2019, the Court entered the Bid Procedures Order.  The
Notice is issued pursuant to the requirements of the Bid Procedures
Order.  

The Debtors have agreed upon a form of Asset Purchase Agreement
with the Purchaser, an executed copy of which will be filed with
the Court no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 8, 2019.  Pursuant to
the APA, the Debtors intend to sell the Assets to the Purchaser for
$8 million in cash plus the waiver of the rights of investors in
the Purchaser to receive distributions on account of claims
asserted against the Debtors in their Chapter 11 cases.  The sale
of the Assets will be subject to higher and better offers as set
forth in the Bid Procedures.  

Pursuant to the Bid Procedures and the Bid Procedures Order, the
Assets will be sold following an Auction (if more than one
Qualified Bid is received) and will be sold free and clear of all
liens, claims, encumbrances and other interests.  The Debtors'
ability to close the transaction(s) contemplated is subject to
approval of the Court.

The Bid Procedures provide for these key dates in connection with
the proposed sale of the Assets:

     a. Deadline to submit proof of Qualified Bidder qualifications
- April 3, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

     b. Deadline for Stalking Horse Bidder to post Earnest Money
Deposit - April 8, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

     c. Deadline for Debtor and/or Stalking Horse Bidder to file
with the Court (i) the executed Asset Purchase Agreement, and
(ii)the proposed language with respect to the treatment of
immigration issues under a plan of liquidation - April 8, 2019 at
5:00 p.m. (ET)

     d. Opening Bid Deadline - April 10, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

     e. Auction - April 11, 2019 at 1:00 p.m. (ET)

     f. Deadline for the Debtors to file a Disclosure of Terms of
Winning Bid - April 11, 2019 at 5:00 p.m (ET)

     g. Deadline to Object to Sale - April 12 2019 at 5:00 p.m.
(ET)

     h. Sale Hearing - April 16, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. (ET)

Copies of the Bid Procedures Order are available for review at the
Office of the Clerk of the Court, United States Bankruptcy Court,
200 South Washington Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314, or upon
request made to the Debtors' counsel.

Any objection to any of the relief to be requested at the Sale
Hearing must be filed by the deadline set by the Court.

All requests for information concerning the Assets, the sale or the
Bid Procedures, including requests for copies of the Motion or the
Bid Procedures Order, should be directed to the counsel for the
Debtors, Mark S. Lichtenstein, Esquire, Crowell & Moring LLP, 590
Madison Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 1022 and Kristen E.
Burgers, Esquire, Hirschler, 8270 Greensboro Drive, Suite 700,
Tysons, Virginia 22102.  

                   About GreenTech Automotive

GreenTech Automotive, Inc. -- http://www.wmgta.com/us-- an
electric car company, and five affiliates filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case No. 18-10651) on
Feb. 26, 2018.

GreenTech Automotive, headquartered in Sterling, Virginia, was
organized in Mississippi in 2009 for the purpose of developing,
producing, marketing and financing energy efficient automobiles,
including electric cars.  WMIC, a Virginia corporation, is a
holding company that holds a majority of the outstanding shares of
common stock of GreenTech.

In the petition signed by Norman Chirite, authorized
representative, GreenTech estimated $100 million to $500 million in
assets and liabilities.  

The Hon. Brian F. Kenney oversees the cases.

Kristen E. Burgers, Esq., at Hirschler Fleischer PC, and Mark S.
Lichtenstein, Esq., at Crowell & Moring LLP, serve as legal counsel
to the Debtors.


GULFSTREAM DIAGNOSTICS: $58K Sale of 2 Medical Equipment Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Stacey G. C. Jernigan of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas authorized Gulfstream Diagnostics, LLC's
sale of two pieces of medical laboratory equipment, namely (i)
Model EMD, Prefilter and E‐bypass Water G Purification System,
S/N F4JA64248 (New 2015), with Elix Model 100 Vent Filtration
System, 2 Pump System, Back‐washable Tank, Loop Filter; and (ii)
Peak Scientific Model I‐Flow 6021, 145‐Psi Nitrogen G
Generator, S/N I15‐10‐016 (New 2015), Equipped with Peak Model
NM32LA Nitrogen Generator Power Supply, S/N A14‐12‐466, Siemens
Logo! Controls, to Everly Well, Inc., for $57,500.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims, interests, and
encumbrances, with all liens, claims, interests, and encumbrances
attaching to the Purchase Price.

The Proceeds will be held by the Debtor in escrow pending further
order from the Court.  The Debtor will not disburse any portion of
the Proceeds.  

The Order will not be stayed by any provision of the Federal Rules
of Bankruptcy Procedure, including Rule 6004(h).

                  About Gulfstream Diagnostics

Gulfstream Diagnostics, LLC, operates a medical laboratory in
Dallas, Texas.  It provides clinical, pharmacogenetics and
toxicology laboratory tests.  Its laboratory features Beckman
Coulter, Agilent Technologies, Douglas Scientific, and Tecan
instrumentation.

Gulfstream Diagnostics filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-30159) on Jan. 16, 2019.  In the
petition signed by Maison Vasek, CFO, the Debtor estimates $1
million to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Stacey G. Jernigan oversees the case.

Thomas Daniel Berghman, Esq., at Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C., is
the Debtor's counsel.  BidMed, LLC, is the broker and auctioneer.


H2O BAGEL: Parkland Buying Parkland Property for $100K
------------------------------------------------------
H2O Bagel No. 2, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida to authorize it to sell and assign to
Parkland Bagel, LLC, all of its properties, assets, and business
located at 7679 N. State Road 7, Parkland, Florida for $100,000.

The Debtor operates a Brooklyn Water Bagels restaurant franchise on
the Parkland real property, which the Debtor leases from BREM
Parkland pursuant to a 10-year renewable lease.  On March 1, 2019,
the Court approved the Debtor's assumption of the Lease.

On Sept. 11, 2018, the Court entered its Final Order Authorizing
(A) Debtors in Possession to Obtain Secured Post-Petition
Financing, and Modifying the Automatic Stay, thereby approving the
Debtor financing from 52318 Bagel, LLC.

The Debtor's assets consist of the Lease and equipment.

Paradise Bank holds an undisputed claim (Claim No. 6-1) in the
amount of $4,883,472 secured by a first-position lien on the
Debtor's personal property, including the Lease.   The Debtor's
property is worth significantly less than Paradise Bank's claim.

Recently, the Debtor entered into the Contract of Sale of All
Business Assets with the Purchaser to, free and clear of all
claims, liens, and encumbrances, assign the Lease, and sell
substantially all of the Debtor's non-cash property, to the
Purchaser for $100,000.  The Purchaser's principal is the son of
the wife of Joseph Wortley, who is the principal of 52318 Bagel.

While Section 3 of the Contract provides that Paradise Bank shall
receive all of the net proceeds from this transaction, the Debtor,
the Purchaser, 52318 Bagel, and Paradise Bank have subsequently
agreed that the $100,000 in proceeds of the sale shall vest in the
Debtor's estate to be distributed, pursuant to a subsequent Court
order, to fund carveouts for: (a) U.S. Trustee's fees; (b)
administrative claims; (c) repayment of the debtor in possession
loan to 52318 Bagel, and (d) a 5% dividend to holders of allowed
unsecured claims, with Paradise Bank receiving a replacement lien
on the $100,000 in proceeds subject to such carveout.

Through the Motion, the Debtor ask approval of the Contract, as
modified, and authorization to assign the Lease, and to sell all of
the Debtor's non-cash/non-motor-vehicle property, to the Purchaser.


Due to the fact that the Debtor is continuing to pay monthly rent
on the leased premises, it asks that the 14-day stay of the
effectiveness of an order granting the Motion be waived pursuant to
Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 6004(h).  

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/H2O_Bagel_183_Sales.pdf

                     About H2O Bagel No. 2

H2O Bagel No. 2, LLC, is a specialty store retailer in Boca Raton,
Florida.  H2O Bagel No. 2 and its affiliate The Original Brooklyn
Store, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case Nos. 18-17542 and 18-17544) on June 22,
2018.  H2O Bagel Parkland filed a Chapter 11 petition on July 9,
2018.   All three cases are jointly administered under Case No.
18-17542.

At the time of the filing, H2O Bagel No. 2 estimated assets of less
than $50,000 and liabilities of $10 million.

The Debtor tapped Philip Landau, Esq., and the law firm of
Shraiberg, Landau & Page, P.A. as its general bankruptcy counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee advised the Court on Aug. 28, 2018,
that until further notice, it will not appoint a committee of
creditors in the Debtors' cases.


HERB PHILIPSON'S: Unsecured Creditors to Get 100% Over 5 Years
--------------------------------------------------------------
The hearing to consider approval of the disclosure statement
explaining Herb Philipson's Army and Navy Stores Inc.'s Chapter 11
plan of reorganization is scheduled for May 15, 2019 at 09:30 AM.

General Unsecured Claims, classified in Class 2, are impaired.
Holders of each Allowed General Unsecured Claim will receive:

   (a) a cash payment equal to 5% of the Claim and thereafter (i)
on the first anniversary of the Effective Date, a cash payment
equal to 20% of the then-remaining balance of such Claim, (ii) on
the second anniversary of the Effective Date, a cash payment equal
to 25% of the then-remaining balance of such Claim, (iii) on the
third anniversary of the Effective Date, a cash payment equal to
33% of the then-remaining balance of such Claim, (iv) on the fourth
anniversary of the Effective Date, a cash payment equal to 50% of
the then-remaining balance of such Claim, and (iv) on the fifth
anniversary of the Effective Date, a cash payment equal to 100% of
the then-remaining balance of such Claim in full and final
satisfaction of such Claim, or

   (b) such other treatment as may be agreed upon by the General
Unsecured Creditor Trustee and the holder of such Allowed General
Unsecured Claim.

The Plan shall be funded from the Debtor's Cash on hand as of the
Effective Date, including a portion of the Reorganized Debtor's
available Exit Financing.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated April 8, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y52sjvvt from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtor is Scott A. Griffin, Esq., and Michael D.
Hamersky, Esq., at Griffin Hamersky LLP, in New York.

                  About Herb Philipson's Army

Founded in 1951, Herb Philipson's Army and Navy Stores Inc. --
https://herbphilipsons.com/ -- is a retailer for outdoor and casual
apparel, workwear, footwear and sporting goods.  Herb Philipson's
is known for brands such as Carhartt, Columbia, Levi, Lee, Under
Armour, Dickies, Timberland and The Northface. It is also the
exclusive retailer for the Utica Comets Hockey Team and the new
Utica City Football Club.  Herb has retail locations in Rome,
Liverpool, New Hartford, Newark, Oneida, Oswego, Herkimer, DeWitt,
and Watertown, New York.

Herb Philipson's Army and Navy Stores Inc. sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Case No.
18-61376) on Oct. 8, 2018.  In the petition signed by Guy Viti,
president, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $10 million and
debts of less than $50 million.

The Debtor tapped Cullen and Dykman LLP and Griffin Hamersky LLP as
counsel; Scouler Kirchhein, LLC as financial advisor; and Kurtzman
Carson Consultants LLC as its claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Oct. 19, 2018.  The committee tapped
Lowenstein Sandler LLP as its legal counsel.


IDEAL DEVELOPMENT: May 13 Plan Confirmation Hearing
---------------------------------------------------
The Disclosure Statement explaining Ideal Development Corporation's
Chapter 11 Plan is conditionally approved.

May 13, 2019 is fixed for the hearing on final approval of the
conditionally approved Disclosure Statement and for confirmation of
the Plan.

May 7, 2019 is fixed as the last day for filing written acceptances
or rejections of the Plan.  May 7, 2019 is fixed as the last day
for filing and serving written objections to the conditionally
approved Disclosure Statement and confirmation of the Plan.

Attorney for Debtor is Will B. Geer, Esq., in Atlanta, Georgia.

            About Ideal Development Corporation

Ideal Development Corporation, a Georgia-based corporation that
operates as a real estate holding company, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No.
18-63172) on Aug. 6, 2018.  In the petition signed by its
president, James T. Walker, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities of less than $1 million.  The Debtor tapped Wiggam &
Geer, LLC, as its legal counsel.  No official committee of
unsecured creditors has been appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


JG CONTRACTING: May 20 Combined Plan, Disclosure Statement Hearing
------------------------------------------------------------------
The disclosure statement explaining JG Contracting LLC's small
business Chapter 11 plan has been conditionally approved, and the
disclosure and confirmation hearings will be combined.

May 20, 2019 is fixed for the hearing on final approval of the
disclosure statement, and for the hearing on confirmation of the
plan and related matters at United States Courthouse 400 East Ninth
Street, Courtroom 6C Kansas City, Missouri 64106.

May 13, 2019 is the deadline for filing with the Court objections
to the disclosure statement or plan confirmation; and submitting to
counsel for the plan proponent ballots accepting or rejecting the
plan.

General unsecured creditors are impaired and will share pro rata in
the "new value" contribution of the equity interest holder Joseph
Gentle during the course of the plan.  This new value contribution
will be $370,000.  Unsecured creditors will receive, over a period
of seven years, a monthly payment that represents their pro rata
share of this amount.  Payment will be made by the last day of each
month.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated April 10, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y5tym9kr from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorney for Debtor is George J. Thomas, Esq., at Phillips & Thomas
LLC, in Prairie Village, Kansas.

Based in Independence, Missouri, JG Contracting LLC, a roofing
contractor specializing in residential and commercial roofing,
gutters, siding, replacement windows and overhead garage doors,
filed a voluntary Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr. W.D. Mo. Case No.
19-40032) on January 7, 2019.

The case is assigned to Hon. Dennis R. Dow.

The Debtor's counsel is George J. Thomas, Esq., at Phillips &
Thomas LLC, in Prairie Village, Kansas.

At the time of filing, the Debtor had total assets of $878,508 and
total liabilities of $2,181,366.


JOSEPH HEATH: Naebzadeh Buying Alexandria Property for $480K
------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph F. Heath asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia to authorize the sale of the real property
described as Lot 34A, Holly Acres Subdivision, in deed book 17463
at page 436, among the land records of Fairfax county, Virginia,
and otherwise known as 3359 Beechcliff Drive, Alexandria, Virginia,
to Kadejh Naebzadeh for $480,000, pursuant to their Contract dated
March 19, 2019, with Addendums, free and clear of liens.

There is no Seller's real estate commission incurred in the
transaction, and only the Buyer's agent's commission of $12,000 is
due on the sale.

The property is encumbered by two liens: a Deed of Trust held by
Wilmington Trust with a balance of approximately $415,000, and a
tax lien against the Debtor's interest held by the Internal Revenue
Service in the amount of $970,369.  The total of all liens on the
property exceed the property's value and the net proceeds which are
expected to come from the proposed sale.

The value received from the sale is appropriate considering the
condition of the property and that no funds were available to put
it into the best condition for a showing; the purchase price is a
higher price than the current assessed tax value of $477,660 as
shown by the tax record (Exhibit 2).

A draft ALTA Combined Settlement Statement (Exhibit 3), which
estimates that after payment of the Wilmington Trust lien and the
expenses of sale, net proceeds in the amount of $45,619 would be
payable to the IRS, less a reserve for the United States Trustee's
Quarterly fees.  Upon information and belief, the trust holders
whose claims are impaired by the proposed sale either have or will
consent to the sale.

The Debtor proposes to pay the first trust in its entirety from the
sale and then turn over the balance at settlement to the IRS less
an appropriate reserve for the payment of the United States
Trustee's Quarterly Fees which will be incurred by the transaction.


The proposed sale is in the best interest of the estate since it
represents the greatest value to the estate and to the creditors
which may be derived from the property, and also because the sale
of this property will reduce the indebtedness owed to the IRS, the
blanket lien holder, and help to create equity in the other
property securing their claims.

The Motion is consistent with the Second Amended Plan of the
Debtor.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Joseph_Heath_459_Sales.pdf

                     About Joseph F. Heath

Joseph F. Heath sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case
No. 07-14107) on Dec. 27, 2007.  The Debtor estimated assets in the
range of $0 to $50,000 and $100,001 to $500,000 in debt.  The
Debtor tapped Bennett A. Brown, Esq., at The Law Office of Bennett
A. Brown, as counsel.

On Dec. 22, 2017, the Court confirmed the Debtor's Second Amended
Plan.


JOSEPH HEATH: Winifred Buying Alexandria Property for $485K
-----------------------------------------------------------
Joseph F. Heath asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia to authorize the sale of the real property
described as Lot 52A, Holly Acres Subdivision, as found among the
land records of Fairfax county, Virginia, and otherwise known as
3319 Beechcliff Drive, Alexandria, Virginia, to Winifred Pingyee NG
for $484,900, with a Seller subsidy of $1,500, pursuant to their
Contract dated March 19, 2019, with Addendums, free and clear of
liens.

There is no Seller's real estate commission incurred in the
transaction, and only the Buyer's agent's commission of $12,122 is
due on the sale.

The property is encumbered by two liens: a Deed of Trust held by
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing with a balance of approximately
$382,875, and a tax lien against the Debtor's interest held by the
Internal Revenue Service in the amount of $970,369.  The total of
all liens on the property exceed the property's value and the net
proceeds which are expected to come from the proposed sale.

The value received from the sale is appropriate considering the
condition of the property and that no funds were available to put
it into the best condition for a showing; the purchase price is a
higher price than the current assessed tax value of $460,130 as
shown by the tax record (Exhibit 2).

A draft ALTA Combined Settlement Statement (Exhibit 3), which
estimates that after payment of the Wilmington Trust lien and the
expenses of sale, net proceeds in the amount of $85,580 would be
payable to the IRS, less a reserve for the United States Trustee's
Quarterly fees for the 2nd Quarter of 2019.  Upon information and
belief, the trust holders whose claims are impaired by the proposed
sale either have or will consent to the sale.

The Debtor proposes to pay the first trust in its entirety from the
sale and then turn over the balance at settlement to the IRS less
an appropriate reserve for the payment of the United States
Trustee's Quarterly Fees which will be incurred by the transaction.


The proposed sale is in the best interest of the estate since it
represents the greatest value to the estate and to the creditors
which may be derived from the property, and also because the sale
of the property will reduce the indebtedness owed to the IRS, the
blanket lien holder, and help to create equity in the other
property securing their claims.

The Motion is consistent with the Second Amended Plan of the
Debtor.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Joseph_Heath_461_Sales.pdf

                     About Joseph F. Heath

Joseph F. Heath sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case
No. 07-14107) on Dec. 27, 2007.  The Debtor estimated assets in the
range of $0 to $50,000 and $100,001 to $500,000 in debt.  The
Debtor tapped Bennett A. Brown, Esq., at The Law Office of Bennett
A. Brown, as counsel.

On Dec. 22, 2017, the Court confirmed the Debtor's Second Amended
Plan.


KHRL GROUP: Seeks to Hire Advanced Evaluation as Appraiser
----------------------------------------------------------
KHRL Group, LLC and Papa Grande Gourmet Foods, LLC seek approval
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas to
hire a real estate appraiser.

The Debtors propose to employ Advanced Evaluation Service to
conduct an appraisal of their property located at 1802 Jackson
Keller, San Antonio.

Robert Kent Carter, the firm's appraiser who will be providing the
services, will charge a flat fee of $3,500 and $1,000 for each day
of testimony in court.   

Mr. Carter disclosed in court filings that he and other employees
of the firm neither hold nor represent any interest adverse to the
the Debtors and their estates.

Advanced Evaluation can be reached through:

     R. Kent Carter
     Advanced Evaluation Service
     1630 Fawn Bluff
     San Antonio, TX 78248
     Phone: 210-658-4300
     Fax: 210-658-4804

                  About KHRL Group and Papa Grande
                           Gourmet Foods

Papa Grande Gourmet Foods, LLC, doing business as Garcia Foods --
http://garciafoods.com/-- is a producer of a growing line of
Mexican food products including tamales, fajitas, chorizo, shredded
chicken, picadillo, carne guisada, carnitas, chili, refried beans,
and rice.  The Garcia Foods was founded in 1956 by Andy Garcia.

KHRL Group, LLC, owns the real estate used in the business.

KHRL Group and Papa Grande Gourmet Foods filed voluntary petitions
seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D.
Tex. Lead Case No. 19-50390) on Feb. 25, 2019.  In the petitions
signed by Kenneth D. Garcia, member, both debtors estimated their
assets and liabilities under $10 million.  

The Hon. Ronald B. King is the case judge.  Ronald J. Smeberg,
Esq., at The Smeberg Law Firm, PLLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


KONTOOR BRANDS: Moody's Assigns 'Ba2' CFR & New Sr. Secured Rating
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned first time ratings to Kontoor
Brands, Inc., including a Ba2 Corporate Family Rating; Ba3-PD
Probability of Default Rating and Ba2 ratings on its proposed $1.55
billion Senior Secured Credit Facilities, consisting of a $500
million Revolving Credit Facility, $750 million Term Loan-A and
$300 million Term Loan-B. At the same time, Moody's assigned a
Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating of SGL-2. The ratings outlook is
stable.

On August 13, 2018, V.F. Corporation, the publicly traded ultimate
parent of Kontoor, announced its plan to separate into two
independent, publicly traded companies by spinning off its
Jeanswear and VF Outlet businesses, which have since been renamed
as Kontoor Brands, Inc. The transaction is currently targeted to be
completed by late May 2019. Kontoor will be capitalized with the
proposed Senior Secured Credit Facilities, with proceeds used to
fund a cash transfer back to members of VF's group, to pay related
fees and expenses and for general corporate purposes. The assigned
ratings are subject to completion of the transaction and review of
final documentation.

Assignments:

Issuer: Kontoor Brands, Inc.

  Corporate Family Rating, Assigned Ba2

  Probability of Default Rating, Assigned Ba3-PD

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Assigned SGL-2

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned Ba2
  (LGD3)

Outlook:

  Assigned, Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Kontoor's Ba2 CFR reflects the iconic nature of its two main
brands, Wrangler and Lee, both with global reach, meaningful scale
and deep customer relationships that drive total company net
revenues of around $2.7 billion for the latest fiscal year ended
December 29, 2018. The rating also reflects the company's solid
profitability, with EBITDA margins in the mid-teens, and consistent
free cash flow generation. Also considered are the company's
moderate proforma leverage, at around 3.4 times (using Moody's
standard adjustments, including leases and securitizations) for the
company's latest fiscal year ended December 29, 2018. Pro forma
interest coverage (EBITA/Interest) is estimated to be around 4.5
times. Kontoor's liquidity profile is good, reflecting Moody's
expectation that cash and operating cash flow will more than
support capital spending, dividend and mandatory amortization needs
over the next 12-18 months.

The rating is constrained by high sales concentration within one
major customer, and limited product diversification with a majority
of total company sales derived from the sale of men's bottoms. The
rating also considers exposure to fashion risk, volatile input
costs and foreign exchange rates, which can have a meaningful
impact on earnings and cash flows, along with the relatively high
proposed dividend payout ratio being considered as a standalone
business, which will constrain free cash flow generation. The
rating further considers the execution risks related to the
transaction and becoming a standalone business, including the
potential for increased costs and potential management distraction
or business disruption.

The Ba2 ratings assigned to the proposed Senior Secured Credit
facilities are equal to the Ba2 Corporate Family Rating, given that
each facility ranks pari passu and comprise the entirety of the
debt capital structure. The Ba3-PD Probability of Default rating is
one notch below the Ba2 CFR as a result of its assumption for an
above average corporate family recovery due to an all-first lien
capital structure that includes financial maintenance covenants.
The Credit Facilities will be secured by a perfected first priority
security interest in substantially all tangible and intangible
assets of the borrower and guarantors, and 65% of the capital stock
of foreign subsidiaries. The facilities will be guaranteed by each
direct and indirect, existing and future wholly owned material
domestic subsidiary.

The stable ratings outlook reflects Moody's expectation that it
will take some time for the company to return to modest revenue and
profit growth, but that free cash flow will remain strong with
excess used to reinvest in the business, reduce debt and maintain
solid credit metrics.

Given the company's product and customer concentrations and recent
revenue declines, a ratings upgrade is unlikely over the
near-to-intermediate term. To be upgraded, the company would need
to return to sustainable revenue and profit growth in both brands,
increase product and customer diversity, continue to generate
positive free cash flow, and maintain credit metrics at or below
pro forma levels, with debt/EBITDA sustained in the low- to mid-3
times range and FFO/Net Debt in the mid- to high-20% range.

The ratings could be downgraded if operating performance
deteriorated through continued revenue and earnings declines, if
liquidity weakened through free cash flow turning negative, reduced
revolver availability or tighter covenant cushion, or if financial
policies were to be more aggressive than anticipated, such as
higher than expected shareholder returns. Specific metrics include
debt/EBITDA sustained above 4.0 times or FFO/Net Debt falling below
20% on a sustained basis.

Kontoor Brands, Inc., headquartered in Greensboro, North Carolina,
is a leading global denim and apparel company consisting mainly of
its Wrangler and Lee brands, and the VF Outlet stores.


KONTOOR BRANDS: S&P Assigns 'BB-' ICR on Spinoff; Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB-' issuer credit rating to
Greenboro, N.C.-based Kontoor Brands Inc., which will become a
separately traded public company following the spinoff from VF
Corp. next month.

At the same time, S&P assigned its 'BB-' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating to the $1.55 billion senior secured credit facility
proposed by the company to fund a $950 million one-time cash
transfer to member's of VF's group and $100 million in cash for
operational needs.

"Our ratings on Kontoor reflect its relatively good market position
as the No. 2 player with approximately 3% of the highly competitive
and fragmented U.S. denim apparel market. Market leader Levi's has
only approximately 5%. The ratings also incorporate potential
operational challenges in separating from VF and establishing
itself as a stand-alone company," S&P said.  The rating agency said
efforts to restructure the business, by streamlining the supply
chain and establishing key corporate functions, could disrupt
operations and impair supplier and customer relationships.  

The stable outlook reflects S&P's view that the company's spinoff
will be successful, and that it will maintain leverage around 3x
and FFO to debt in the low- to mid-20% area over the next year. S&P
expects the company to invest in its digital capabilities and
geographic expansions to stem the decline in its wholesale
channels, and generate about $70 million-$90 million discretionary
cash flow for debt reduction.

"We could raise our ratings if Kontoor successfully completes the
spinoff, improves debt to EBITDA toward the mid-2x area, and
strengthens FFO to debt above 30%. In addition, the company would
need to reverse negative sales trends and demonstrate modest
top-line growth while sustaining adjusted EBITDA margins at about
15%-16%," S&P said. The rating agency estimates that EBITDA would
need to improve by about 20% or FFO by about 25%, and believes the
company could achieve this by investing in its digital channels and
international expansion while stabilizing its declining U.S.
segment and establishing its stand-alone key corporate and supply
chain functions as planned.

"We could lower our ratings if the separation process from VF leads
to significantly higher stand-alone costs or operational disruption
such that the company cannot return Wrangler and Lee to growth.
These operational challenges would likely result in the company's
credit metrics deteriorating significantly, with debt to EBITDA
exceeding 4x," S&P said. The rating agency estimates EBITDA would
need to decrease by 35% for this to occur.

"We could also lower our ratings if the company's financial policy
becomes more aggressive, with excessive shareholder returns or
acquisitions such that leverage exceeds 4x. We estimate debt would
need to increase by $400 million at current EBITDA for this to
occur," S&P said.


LITCHFIELD LASER: New Plan Discloses 3-Tiered Payment Approach
--------------------------------------------------------------
Litchfield Laser Skin Care, LLC, filed its first amended disclosure
statement in connection with its proposed chapter 11 plan.

The latest plan contemplates a three-tiered payment approach.
Accordingly, payments to all creditors will begin on the Effective
Date (Oct. 1, 2019), with priority tax claims paid by April 30,
2023, 43 months thereafter (a date which is within 60 months of the
Petition Date, as required by statute). Thereafter, the amount of
monthly payments to secured and unsecured creditors will increase,
with secured claims paid by Sept. 30, 2024 (five years from the
Effective Date). General unsecured claims will be paid in
accordance with the Plan by May 31, 2026 (six years, seven months
after the Effective Date).

A copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yynxosar from Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

                 About Litchfield Laser Skin Care

Litchfield Laser Skin Care, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 18-50661) on May
25, 2018.  In the petition signed by Dr. Elizabeth Galan, owner,
the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of
$1 million.


LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR; Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B-' long-term issuer credit rating
on Livingston International Inc., which plans to refinance its
existing capital structure with proceeds from new secured credit
facilities.

The rating agency expects the proposed transaction to reduce debt
by about C$80 million and push out the company's debt maturity
profile, thereby improving liquidity and reducing the company's
refinancing risks.

Meanwhile, S&P assigned its 'B-' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating to the company's proposed US$272 million first-lien
term loan facility due 2026 and C$175 million revolving credit
facility due 2024.  It also assigned its 'CCC' issue-level rating
and '6' recovery rating to Livingston's proposed US$75 million
second-lien term loan facility due 2027.

S&P expects about C$460 million net proceeds from the debt issuance
along with just under C$200 million of equity provided from
Platinum Equity Capital Partners will be used primarily to purchase
the equity interest in Livingston, repay the company's debt
outstanding, and pay related fees and expenses. The proposed
transaction pushes out the company's debt maturity profile, thereby
improving liquidity and reducing the company's refinancing risks.

"Our ratings also reflect our forecast for adjusted FFO-to-cash
interest coverage of 1.5x-1.8x over the next couple of years and
our view that Livingston has significant exposure to rising
short-term interest rates, given that the majority of its debt
outstanding will have a variable benchmark rate. Our relatively
weak outlook for coverage ratios is a function of our assumption
that average short-term interest rates will increase in North
America," S&P said.

In S&P's view, relatively low interest coverage ratios and
sensitivity to interest rates, combined with the company's private
equity ownership and high debt level, constrain the rating at this
time. S&P's rating also reflects its view of Livingston's small
scale when compared to the broader business services industry
because the company generates less than C$100 million of adjusted
EBITDA.

S&P said it expects modest improvement in operating results, with
limited refinancing risk following the transaction. Operating
performance improved through 2018, underpinned by an increase in
adjusted EBITDA margins of about 160 basis points; and the rating
agency expects further improvement through 2020. This incorporates
the rating agency's forecast of annual revenue growth of 1%-2% and
lower transaction and integration costs, as well as the execution
of cost-saving initiatives that Livingston and Platinum have
identified. S&P said adjusted EBITDA margins should remain below
20% over the next few years, which the rating agency considers
relatively low for a company that offers professional services.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that positive annual
organic revenue growth of 1%-2% and improving adjusted EBITDA
margins should contribute to positive FOCF and adjusted FFO-to-cash
interest coverage of 1.5x-1.8x over the next couple of years.

"We could lower our ratings within the next 12 months if revenue
growth and adjusted EBITDA margins trend below our expectations,
potentially contributing to negative FOCF and adjusted FFO-to-cash
interest coverage below 1.5x. This scenario could result from lower
trade volumes potentially due to weaker-than-expected macroeconomic
conditions that lead us to conclude that the company's financial
commitments are unsustainable," S&P said.

"We could raise our ratings on Livingston within the next 12 months
if we expect the company to sustain adjusted FFO-to-cash interest
coverage above 2x and adjusted debt-to-EBITDA near 5x. This could
occur from solid organic growth prospects and execution of the
company's cost-saving initiatives, which in turn contribute to
adjusted EBITDA margins above 20% and stronger-than-expected FOCF,"
the rating agency said.

Livingston is a provider of customs brokerage and compliance
services in North America. The company also offers international
trade consulting and international freight forwarding across the
continent and around the globe. Livingston employs more than 3,200
employees at more than 105 key border crossings, seaports,
airports, and other strategic locations in North America, Europe,
and Asia.


LONG BLOCKCHAIN: Incurs $742,600 Net Loss in Q3 2018
----------------------------------------------------
Long Blockchain Corp. has filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $742,642 on $827,146 of net revenue for the three months ended
Sept. 30, 2018, compared to a net loss of $3.91 million on $1.55
million of net revenue for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2017.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2018, the Company reported a
net loss of $4.86 million on $2.36 million of net revenue, compared
to a net loss of $11.59 million on $3.90 million of net revenue for
the same period during the prior year.

As of Sept. 30, 2018, the Company had $12.96 million in total
assets, $4.14 million in total liabilities, and $8.81 million in
total stockholders' equity.

                   Liquidity and Going Concern

From inception, the Company has financed its operations through the
issuance of debt and equity, and through utilizing trade credit
with its vendors.  The Company said it will require additional
capital to fund the operating losses of the existing beverage
business, as well as to fund the development of the loyalty and
blockchain business.

As of Sept. 30, 2018, the Company had cash of $480,559.  As of
Sept. 30, 2018, the Company had a working capital deficit of
$1,665,518.  As of March 31, 2019, the Company had cash of
approximately $140,000.

Pursuant to a Loan and Option Agreement dated Dec. 20, 2017 with
Court Cavendish Ltd., on Jan. 15, 2018 and Jan. 30, 2018, the
Company borrowed $750,000 and $500,000, respectively, under this
arrangement.  On May 3, 2018, the 2017 Cavendish Loan Agreement was
amended and the Company drew an additional $1,000,000.

On Jan. 18, 2019, the Company entered into a second amended loan
agreement with Cavendish.  Pursuant to the January 2019 Cavendish
Restated Agreement, Cavendish will convert $241,524 of accrued but
unpaid interest and $1,550,000 of principal into 12,723,382 shares
of the Company's common stock.  The Company may no longer request
any further drawdowns from Cavendish under the Cavendish Restated
Facility.

According to Long Blockchain "The Company's ability to continue its
operations and to pay its obligations when they become due is
contingent upon the Company being able to generate cash flows from
its operations, as well by obtaining proceeds from additional
financings.  Management's plans include raising additional funds
through equity offerings, debt financings, or other means.

"There are no assurances that the Company will be able to generate
cash flow from its operations and/or raise required capital on
terms acceptable to the Company or at all.  If the Company is
unable to obtain sufficient amounts of additional capital, it may
be required to reduce the scope of its current operations, as well
as defer, delay and/or curtail its effort to develop the loyalty
and blockchain business.  These steps may include reductions in
personnel or other operating cost reductions.  These conditions
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free from the
SEC's website at https://is.gd/SQaNpO.

                 About Long Blockchain Corp.

Headquartered in Hicksville, New York, Long Blockchain Corp. --
http://www.longblockchain.com/-- is focused on developing and
investing in globally scalable blockchain-based financial
technology solutions.  It is dedicated to becoming a significant
participant in the evolution of blockchain technology that creates
long-term value for its shareholders and the global community by
investing in and developing businesses that are "on-chain".
Blockchain technology is fundamentally changing the way people and
businesses transact, and the Company will strive to be at the
forefront of this dynamic industry, actively pursuing
opportunities.  Its wholly-owned subsidiary Long Island Brand
Beverages, LLC operates in the non-alcohol ready-to-drink segment
of the beverage industry under its flagship brand 'The Original
Long Island Brand Iced Tea'.

Long Blockchain incurred a net loss of $15.21 million in 2017 and a
net loss of $10.44 million in 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Long
Blockchain had $11.28 million in total assets, $3.68 million in
total liabilities, and $7.59 million in total stockholders' equity.


Marcum LLP, the Company's auditor since 2014, issued a "going
concern" opinion in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, citing that the
Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has incurred
significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to meet its
obligations and sustain its operations.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


LOUISIANA PELLETS: Trustee Suit vs Ex-Officers Remanded to La. Ct.
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned CRAIG JALBERT, TRUSTEE, o/b/o GERMAN PELLETS
LOUISIANA, L.L.C. AND LOUISIANA PELLETS, INC., v. PETER LEIBOLD, et
al., Civil Action 1:18-CV-00788 (W.D. La.), Magistrate Judge Joseph
H.L. Perez-Montes recommends granting Plaintiff's motion to remand
and denying Defendants' motions to dismiss for lack of
jurisdiction.

Plaintiff Craig Jalbert, the Chapter 11 liquidating trustee for
German Pellets Louisiana, L.L.C. and Louisiana Pellets, Inc., filed
a petition for damages and injunctive relief in the 28th Louisiana
Judicial District Court in LaSalle Parish. The named defendants are
Peter Leibold, Anna Kathrin Leibold, Michael Leibold, Meranda
Hyman, GP GmbH (parent company of SPLA and LAP), and VOV GmbH. GPLA
and LP defaulted on their obligations to bondholders in 2016 and
filed voluntary petitions for Chapter 11 relief in the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana.
Jalbert was named their Trustee in a confirmed joint chapter 11
plan of liquidation.  At the same time, their parent company, GP
GmbH filed for bankruptcy protection in Germany.

The Leibolds and Hyman are four former officers and directors of LP
and GPLA (Hyman was the most senior accountant). VOV is an
insurance association based in Cologne, Germany. VOV represents the
six underwriters that provided "officer and director coverage" for
policyholder GP GmbH and its subsidiaries, LP and GPLA.

The Trustee filed a post-confirmation complaint in a Louisiana
state court, seeking monetary damages and alleging Defendants
breached their fiduciary duties by transferring millions of dollars
from LP and GPLA to GP GmbH for no consideration. The Trustee
contends Defendants placed the money from the LP and GPLA accounts
beyond the reach of creditors and bondholders in the United States.
The Trustee also seeks injunctive relief to preclude VOV from
paying its policy limits to GP GmbH, to the detriment of LP's and
GPLA's creditors.

Hyman answered the petition and made a reconventional demand
against the Trustee, the Leibolds, GP GmbH, and VOV. Hyman seeks
monetary damages, contending she was never an officer, director, or
shareholder of GPLA, has no liability as a corporate actor, and was
fraudulently joined as a defendant in this action.

VOV removed alleging federal jurisdiction pursuant to: (1) 9 U.S.C.
section 203 and section 205 because this matter relates to an
arbitration agreement falling under the Convention on the
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of June 10,
1958, 21 U.S.T. section 2517, T.I.A.S. section 6997, 330 U.N.T.S.
section 3 (9 U.S.C. sections 201, et seq.); (2) 28 U.S.C. section
1334 because this case is "related to" a case under title 11; and
(3) 28 U.S.C. section 1332 because there is diversity in
citizenship.
Defendants Hyman and GP GmbH did not consent to removal. GP GmbH
has never appeared.

The Court finds that removal was defective because Hyman did not
consent to removal by VOV.

There are three well-recognized exceptions to the rule that all
defendants must join in the removal petitions to effect removal:
(1) where the defendant was not yet served with process at the time
the removal petition was filed; (2) where a defendant is merely a
nominal, unnecessary, or formal party-defendant; and (3) where the
removed claim is a separate and independent claim under 28 U.S.C.
section 1441(c).

In this case, although there is no record evidence that Hyman was
ever served, Hyman voluntarily appeared by answering the complaint
in state court. The case was removed on June 13, 2018, and Hyman
did not indicate her consent to removal.

The Trustee has also adequately alleged breach of fiduciary duties
and corporate waste by Hyman. Viewing the factual allegations in
the light most favorable to the Plaintiff, Defendants have not
carried their burden of proving there is no possibility of recovery
by the Trustee against Hyman. Therefore, Defendants have not proven
Hyman was improperly joined as a Defendant.

Accordingly, the removal is procedurally defective and the case
should be remanded.

Because removal was defective, it is recommended that Plaintiff's
Motion to Remand (Doc. 8) be granted and this case be remanded to
the Louisiana 28th Judicial District Court in LaSalle Parish.

A copy of the Court's Recommendation dated Feb. 13, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2vftjVy from Leagle.com.

Craig Jalbert, in his capacity as Chapert 11 Liquidating Trustee,
Plaintiff, represented by Walter E. Dorroh, Jr. , Dorroh &
Kendrick, Brent B. Barriere , Fishman Haygood, Catherine Elena
Lasky , Lasky Murphy, Degan Skylar Rosenbloom , Fishman Haygood,
Jason W. Burge , Fishman Haygood, Kerry A. Murphy , Lasky Murphy,
Rebecca Sha , Phelps Dunbar & Rebekka C. Veith , Fishman Haygood.

Peter Leibold, Anna Kathrin Leibold & Michael Leibold, Defendants,
represented by Stephen H. Kupperman , Barrasso Usdin et al &
Madison Sharko , Barrasso Usdin et al.

Meranda Hyman, Defendant, represented by R. Joseph Wilson , Wilson
& Wilson & Christie Clark Wood , Wilson & Wilson.

V O V G m b H, Defendant, represented by Marshall M. Redmon ,
Phelps Dunbar, Jeremy T. Grabill , Phelps Dunbar & Kevin William
Welsh , Phelps Dunbar.

Meranda Hyman, Cross Claimant, represented by R. Joseph Wilson ,
Wilson & Wilson & Christie Clark Wood , Wilson & Wilson.

                About Louisiana Pellets

Louisiana Pellets, Inc, and German Pellets Louisiana, LLC, are
members of the "German Pellets" family of companies, which is a
family of related companies centered in Wismar, Germany, operating
in the wood pellets industry.

LPI owns a wood pellet production facility located on 334 acres of
land in Urania, Louisiana.  The Facility is still under
construction and is not yet fully complete or operational.  GPLA is
the general contractor for construction of the Facility.  A
contract is in place with E.ON UK PLC (a United Kingdom utility
company) to purchase the wood pellet production from the Facility.

LPI and PLA sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. La. Lead Case
No. 16-80162) on Feb. 18, 2016, due to cost overruns and delays in
the course of construction of their still-to-be-completed wood
pellet production facility.  The petitions were signed by
Anna-Kathrin Leibold, president and chief executive officer.  The
Hon. John W. Kolwe presides over the case.

Louisiana Pellets estimated assets and debts at $100 million to
$500 million.  German Pellets estimated assets and debts at $50
million to $100 million.

The Debtors tapped Locke Lord LLP as counsel.

Henry Hobbs, Jr., acting U.S. Trustee for Region 5, appointed on
March 15, 2016, five creditors of Louisiana Pellets Inc. and German
Pellets Louisiana LLC to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained Jones Walker LLP as
counsel and Cooley LLP as co-counsel.


MACAULEY CONTRACTING: $210K Sale of Assets to Mike Beeler Approved
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Andrew B. Altenburg, Jr. of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey authorized Macauley Contracting, LLC's sale
of assets, consisting of trailers, tools and equipment, to Mike
Beeler Equipment Services, Inc. for $210,300.

The Assets are: (a) 2007 Cat Bulldozer D5GLGP S/N ending in 3619;
(b) 2005 Cat Backhoe Model 42D S/N ending in 1698; (c) 2009 Cat
Backhoe Model 420E S/N ending in 0625; (d) 2008 Cat Excavator Model
312CL S/N ending in 0096; (e) 2011 Cat Excavator Model 305DLR S/N
ending in 1387; (f) 2013 Hamm Roller Model H13IX S/N ending in
0003;  (g) 2015 Cat Skid Steer Model 289DXPS S/N ending in 4278;
(h) 2001 Mack Dump Truck Model RD6905 S/N ending in 0304; (i) 2007
Talbert 25 Ton Trailer S/N ending in 7886;  (j) 2016 Quality
Trailer S/N ending in 4251; (k) 2017 Sure Trac Trailer S/N ending
in 0284; (l) 2009 Wacker Trench Roller Model RT82SC2; (m) Honda
Core Saw S/N ending in 3118;  (n) Backhoe Forks; (o) Trench Box;
and (p) Miscellaneous tools and equipment.

The sale is free and clear of all Liens, with Liens to attach to
the proceeds of the sale.

The 14-day stay pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004(h) is waived.

Macauley Contracting, LLC sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D.N.J. Case No. 19-10990) on Jan. 16, 2019.  The Debtor tapped
Maureen P. Steady, Esq., t Kurtzman | Steady, LLC, as counsel.


MIDATECH PHARMA: Incurs GBP15.03 Million Net Loss in 2018
---------------------------------------------------------
Midatech Pharma reported its audited financial results for the
twelve-month period ended Dec. 31, 2018.

Midatech reported a net loss of GBP15.03 million on GBP1.93 million
of total revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a
net loss of GBP16.06 million on GBP989,000 of total revenue for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, Midatech had GBP20.44 million in total assets,
GBP3.52 million in total liabilities, and $16.92 million in total
equity.  As at Dec. 31, 2018, the Group had cash and cash
equivalents of GBP2.34 million.

Net cash outflow from operating activities for the year was
GBP13.45 million (2017: GBP12.95 million).  Including the sale of
Midatech Pharma US, Inc. ("MPUS"), there was a net cash inflow from
investing activities of GBP9.04 million (2017: outflow of GBP1.47
million).  There was a net outflow from financing activities of
GBP6.47 million including the repayment of the MidCap loan, early
redemption fees, loan interest and finance lease charges (2017:
inflow of GBP10.28 million).  Overall, there was a net cash outflow
for the year, before the effect of exchange rates on cash and cash
equivalents, of GBP10.88 million (2017: outflow of GBP4.15
million), resulting in a year end cash balance of GBP2.34 million
(2017: GBP13.20 million).

The Group has experienced net losses and significant cash outflows
from cash used in operating activities over the past years as it
develops its portfolio.  As at Dec. 31, 2018 the Group had an
accumulated deficit of GBP89.72 million.

"The long-term viability of the Group is dependent on its ability
to generate cash from operating activities, to raise additional
capital to finance its operations and to successfully obtain
regulatory approval to allow marketing of the Group's development
products.  The Group's failure to raise capital as and when needed
could have a negative impact on its financial condition and ability
to pursue its business strategies," Midatech stated in a press
release.

Following the year end, Midatech concluded a fundraise in a
Subscription, Placing and Open Offer.  This raised proceeds of
GBP13.4m before expenses and the new shares were admitted to AIM on
Feb. 26, 2019.

Commenting on the full year 2018 results, Midatech's Chief
Executive Officer, Dr. Craig Cook, said: "2018 was a year of
strategic refocusing of the business, with Midatech becoming a
pure-play R&D company following the divestment of our US commercial
operation in November, a major milestone for the Group.

"We believe the Company has entered a new chapter in its growth as
a streamlined R&D focused business with in-house manufacturing.  We
are now delivering on clinical milestones, with strong clinical
data, and a compelling pipeline for our proprietary drug delivery
platforms, all of which are now into the clinic.

"We look forward to an exciting period ahead, creating value for
all stakeholders."

A full-text copy of the press release is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/bbMpy9

                      About Midatech Pharma

Midatech Pharma PLC -- http://www.midatechpharma.com/-- is an
international specialty pharmaceutical company focused on the
research and development of a pipeline of medicines for oncology
and immunotherapy.  The Company is developing a range of improved
chemo-therapeutics or new immuno-therapeutics, using its three
proprietary platform drug delivery technologies, all of which are
in the clinic.  Midatech is headquartered in Oxfordshire, with an
R&D facility in Cardiff and a manufacturing operation in Bilbao,
Spain.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm BDO LLP,
in Reading, United Kingdom, the Company's auditor since 2014, on
the consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31,
2017, includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the Company
has suffered recurring losses from operations and has an
accumulated deficit that raise substantial doubt about its ability
to continue as a going concern.

Midatech reported a loss before tax of GBP17.32 million in 2017
following a loss before tax of GBP29.32 million in 2016.  As of
Dec. 31, 2017, Midatech had GBP49.22 million in total assets,
GBP14.54 million in total liabilities and GBP34.67 million in total
equity.


MILLERBERND SYSTEMS: $2.3M Sale of All Assets to Burwell Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Michael E. Ridgway of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Minnesota authorized Millerbernd Systems, Inc.'s sale
of substantially all assets to Burwell Enterprises, LLC or to an
affiliate, for $2.25 million.

The sale is free and clear of liens, claims, and encumbrances
outside the ordinary course of business.

The Debtor will set aside $900,000 of the sale proceeds designated
for the purchase of Equipment under the APA in a segregated account
until further order of the Court.  Neither the Debtor nor any
subsequent Liquidating Trustee is authorized to distribute any
portion of such proceeds from the sale until further order of the
Court.

After resolution of the disputed secured claims of TCF Equipment
Finance, Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, and Bluco Corp., the Debtor
or any subsequent Liquidating Trustee (as is appropriate at the
time), is authorized to satisfy the secured claims of TCF, WF, and
Bluco based on such resolution.  For the avoidance of doubt, the
segregation of the $900,000 in sale proceeds attributable to the
Equipment does not limit, in any way, the ability or right of TCF,
WF, or Bluco to assert that their respective liens cover the full
amount of indebtedness owed to each of them, respectively.  The
combined indebtedness owed by the Debtor to TCF, WF, and Bluco is
less than $900,000.

After such resolution of the disputed secured claims of TCF, WF,
and Bluco, the Debtor or any subsequent Liquidating Trustee (as is
appropriate at the time) is authorized to pay the secured portion
of the Chase claim in the amount of $5,969 and the secured portion

of HP Financial Services claim in the amount of $4,463.

Notwithstanding Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d), the Order
will take effect immediately upon entry.

                   About Millerbernd Systems

Millerbernd Systems, Inc., is a manufacturer of sanitary stainless
steel equipment serving the food & beverage, pharmaceutical,
agri-food, industrial, utilites, wind energy and construction
industries.  It operates out of a 105,000-square-foot manufacturing
facility in Winsted, Minnesota.

Millerbernd Systems sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Minn. Case No. 18-41286) on April 23,
2018.  In the petition signed by CEO Ralph Millerbernd, the Debtor
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.

Judge Michael E. Ridgway oversees the case.

Steven B. Nosek, Esq., and Yvonne R. Doose, Esq., who have an
office in St. Anthony, Minnesota, serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.

James L. Snyder, the U.S. Trustee for Region 12 on May 3, 2018,
appointed three creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case.  The Committee retained
Goldstein & McClintock LLLP, as lead counsel; and Bassford Remele,
P.A., as co-counsel.


MR. STEVEN: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for May 21
----------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy John W. Kolwe entered an order approving Mr. Steven,
L.L.C. and Lady Eve, L.L.C.'s amended disclosure statement
referring to their chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

May 14, 2019 is fixed as the last date for filing written
acceptances or rejections of the Plan, and to the confirmation of
the Plan.

May 21, 2019 at 10:00 AM is fixed as the date and time for hearing
on confirmation of the Plan. That hearing will be held at 214
Jefferson Street, 1st Floor Courtroom, Lafayette, Louisiana.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that the Debtors
have reached a settlement with SBN V FNBC LLC.

A full-text copy of the Joint Amended Disclosure Statement dated
April 1, 2019, is available at http://tinyurl.com/y3kb3gq2from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                     About Mr. Steven

Mr. Steven, L.L.C., is a privately held company in New Iberia,
Louisiana, engaged in the business of offshore marine vessel
leasing.  Mr. Steven filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. La.
Case No. 18-51277) on Oct. 3, 2018.  In the petition signed by Mr.
Steven J. Miguez, manager, the Debtor disclosed $5,152,864 in
assets and $23,651,405 in liabilities.  Robin B. Cheatham, Esq., at
Adams and Reese LLP, represents the Debtor.


NAEEM W. BUTT: Court Dismisses Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case
---------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Paul R. Warren granted the U.S. Trustee's motion
to dismiss the chapter 11 bankruptcy case of Naeem W. Butt.

On Jan. 28, 2019, Naeem W. Butt filed a bare-bones Chapter 11
petition. Then, nothing happened in his bankruptcy case. Mr. Butt's
bankruptcy case languished for two months, while uncured
deficiencies piled up on the docket because of Mr. Butt's failure
to attend to his obligations under Chapter 11.

It is Mr. Butt's seemingly calculated inaction during the two
months since the case was filed that raises issues of much concern
to the Court. By filing his petition, Mr. Butt has received the
benefit of the automatic stay, while failing to fulfill any of his
obligations under Chapter 11 of the Code. Other than filing some of
the missing schedules and statements during the past few days and
providing some--but not all--of the documentation demanded by the
UST, Mr. Butt has done nothing to fulfill his obligations under
Chapter 11.

The UST has demonstrated cause to convert or dismiss this case
under 11 U.S.C. sections 1112(b)(1), (b)(4)(F), (b)(4)(G), and
(b)(4)(H). The exceptions under section 1112(b)(1) and (b)(2) do
not apply in this case. In the exercise of its discretion, the
Court finds that dismissal of the Chapter 11 case is in the best
interests of creditors and the estate.

A copy of the Court's Decision and Order dated April 4, 2019 is
available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/nywb2-19-20076-48.pdf

Naeem W. Butt filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
W.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-20076) on Jan. 28, 2019, and is represented by
David H. Ealy, esq. of Trevett, Cristo, Salzer & Andolina P.C.


NEW ENGLAND: Sets Bidding Procedures for All Eastern-Carrier Assets
-------------------------------------------------------------------
New England Motor Freight, Inc. and its affiliated debtors ask the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey to authorize
to authorize the bidding procedures in connection with the sale of
substantially all of their Eastern Freight Ways, Inc. and Carrier
Industries, Inc.'s assets at auction.

The Debtors commenced the Chapter 11 Cases with the goal of
liquidating all of their assets and maximizing value for all
constituents.  Although they have commenced the liquidation
process, both Eastern and Carrier continue to operate their
respective businesses.  The Debtors, in their business judgment,
have determined that a going concern sale of Eastern and Carrier
through an open bidding and auction process is the best way to
maximize the value of the Assets.

Eastern is a truckload carrier, based in South Brunswick, New
Jersey.  Eastern was established in 1994 to provide premium
truckload services to customers in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic
regions.  All of its vehicles are equipped with the latest
satellite technology for enhanced communication, shipment, tracking
and increased efficiency.  Eastern operates principally within
short-to-medium haul traffic lanes.  The majority of Eastern's
dispatches are for overnight or same-day delivery.

Carrier is a dedicated contract carriage services company,
providing all aspects of supply chain management and logistical
planning.     

The Debtors believe that the Sale process will allow the continued
operations of Eastern and Carrier as a going concern under new
ownership post-closing.  Given the challenges facing the Debtors
leading up to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, the
proposed process presents the best option for maximizing the value
of these Debtors' estates and stakeholder recoveries.

The Debtors believe that the solicitation of bids and a sale of the
Assets on the timeline proposed herein allow them to maximize value
for all stakeholders while minimizing administrative expenses.
During this process, the will engage with interested parties, and
attempt to attract interested parties that will participate in a
competitive auction process contemplated by the Bidding Procedures.


The Debtors propose that the hearing to approve the Bidding
Procedures be held on April 8, 2019, with objections to the Bidding
Procedures, if any, to be filed by April 3, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).
They propose that the bid deadline be set for May 9, 2019 at 4:00
p.m. (ET), and that the auction of the Debtors' Assets, if
required, be scheduled for May 14, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (ET).  The
Debtors propose that the Court hold the hearing to approve the sale
and enter the Approval Order on May 16, 2019 with objections to the
relief requested in the Approval Order (other than with respect to
the conduct of the Auction), if any, to be filed by May 6, 2019 at
4:00 p.m. (ET) and objections to the conduct of the Auction, if
any, to be filed prior to the commencement of the Sale Hearing.  

In accordance with Local Rule 6004-1(a)(3), the material terms of
the proposed sale pursuant to the Template Asset Purchase Agreement
are:

      (1) Sellers: Eastern Freight Ways, Inc. and Carrier
Industries, Inc.

      (2) Property to be Sold:  Template Asset Purchase Agreement
at Article 2.1.

      (3) Date, Time and Place of Sale: If the Debtors receive one
or more Qualified Bids, they will conduct an Auction on  May14,
2019 at 10:00 a.m. (ET) at the offices of Gibbons P.C., One Gateway
Center, Newark, N.J. 07102, or at such other place and time as the
Debtors will notify all Qualified Bidders and other invitees.  The
Debtors propose that the Sale Hearing be scheduled for May 16,
2019.

      (4) Purchase Price: There is no minimum consideration for the
Assets provided for in the Template Asset Purchase Agreement.  

      (5) Conditions of the Sale: The closing of the transactions
contemplated by the Template Asset Purchase Agreement are set forth
in Article III.

      (6) Deadline for Approval or Closing of Sale: The closing
must occur by May 31, 2019.

      (7) Deposit and Forfeiture of Deposit: 10% percent of the
purchase price in an escrow account established by the Debtors

      (8) Assumption and Assignment of Executory Contracts and
Leases: The Template Asset Purchase Agreement provides for bidders
to designate executory contracts and unexpired leases that such
bidders want assumed and assigned in connection with the Sale.

      (9) Credit Bidding: The proposed Sale does not involve a
credit bidding.

      (10) The Sale is free and clear of all Liabilities and
Liens.

By the Motion, the Debtors ask the entry of two orders:

     (a) the Bidding Procedures Order (i) approving the Bidding
Procedures attached to the Bidding Procedures Order; (ii) approving
the notice attached to the Bidding Procedures Order of the deadline
to bid on the Debtors's Assets; (iii) setting the time, date and
place of the Auction if one or more Qualified Bids are presented in
a manner that conforms to the Bidding Procedures; (iv) scheduling
the Sale Hearing on May 16, 2019, to consider the entry of the
Approval Order; and (v) approving the notice attached to the
Bidding Procedures Order of the Debtors’ intent to assume,
assign, and/or transfer to the Successful Bidder or Back-Up Bidder,
the contracts commitments, leases, licenses, permits, purchase
orders and any other executory contracts and unexpired leases and
the corresponding cure amounts required to be paid in connection
with such assumption, assignment and/or transfer;

     (b) following the Sale Hearing, the Debtors ask the entry of
the Approval Order pursuant to Sections 105(a) and 363(b), (f), and
(m) of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 6004, (i) approving
the sale of substantially all of the Debtors' Assets to the party
holding the highest or otherwise best bid for the Assets free and
clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances, and other interests
(other than certain specified assumed liabilities), (ii)
authorizing the Debtors to assume and assign to the Successful
Bidder the Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases; and (iii)
granting related and ancillary relief.

In addition, the Debtors ask the authority, subject to the terms of
the Bidding Procedures Order, without the necessity of a further
hearing or authorization of the Court in their discretion, to
accept a stalking horse bid from a potential bidder and enter into
a purchase agreement with such potential bidder, if they determine,
in their discretion, that entry into such a Stalking Horse Purchase
Agreement on such terms and conditions that they reasonably
determine are in the best interests of their estates.

As is customary, to enable the Debtors to enter into a Stalking
Horse Purchase Agreement, the Debtors foresee that it may be
necessary to afford a Stalking Horse Bidder certain bid protections
such as a break-up fee and expense reimbursement. To that end, they
ask authority, in their discretion, and without the necessity of a
further hearing or authorization of the Court: (i) to agree to pay
the Stalking Horse Bidder a break-up fee of up to 5%) of its
Stalking Horse Bid as set forth in its Stalking Horse Purchase
Agreement and reimbursement of its reasonable and documented
out-of-pocket expenses and disbursements not to exceed $75,000,
incurred in connection with its due diligence or Stalking Horse Bid
if the Stalking Horse Bidder does not become the Successful Bidder
at the Auction; and (ii) to amend or modify the Bidding Procedures
as is necessary to facilitate such Stalking Horse Bid.

They further ask that any such Bid Protections which are granted to
a Stalking Horse Bidder within the parameters permitted by the
Bidding Procedures Order be allowed as administrative expense
claims in the Chapter 11 Cases under section 364(c)(1) of the
Bankruptcy Code with priority over all expenses and which will be
payable in cash to a Stalking Horse Bidder from the proceeds of a
sale to a Successful Bidder within seven days of the Debtors'
receipt of such proceeds.

If they designate a Stalking Horse Bidder, the Debtors will within
two business days thereof file a notice of such determination with
the Court.   They will select the highest or otherwise best
Qualified Bid for substantially all of the Assets to be the
starting bid at the Auction.  In no event will any Qualified
Bidder, other than a Stalking Horse Purchaser be entitled to seek a
break-up fee, expense reimbursement or any similar bidding
protections.  

Within three business days after entry of the Bidding Procedures
Order, the Debtors (or their agent) will: (i) cause the Notice of
Auction and Sale Hearing, and a copy of the Bidding Procedures
Order to all Sale Notice Parties; (ii) serve the Notice of Auction
and Sale Hearing on any other party appearing on the Debtors'
creditor matrix; and (iii) provide electronic notification of the
Motion, the Bidding Procedures Order and the Notice of Auction and
Sale Hearing via the Court's electronic case filing website.

In order to facilitate the sale of the Assets and the assumption,
assignment, and/or transfer of the Executory Contracts and
Unexpired Leases to the Successful Bidder contemplated thereunder,
within three business days of entry of the Bidding Procedures
Order, the Debtors will serve copies of the Bidding Procedures
Order and the Notice of Assumption and Assignment on all
parties-in-interest.  Teh Adequate Assurance Objection Deadline is
May 15, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

The Debtors ask that the Court waives the stay imposed by
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h).

A copy of the Bidding Procedures attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/New_England_Motor_335_Sales.pdf

                 About New England Motor Freight

New England Motor Freight, Inc. -- http://www.nemf.com/-- provides
less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier services in the United States and
Canada.  Founded in 1977, the company is based in Elizabeth, New
Jersey, and has terminals in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic.

New England Motor Freight and its affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Lead Case
No. 19-12809) on Feb. 11, 2019.  At the time of the filing, New
England Motor estimated assets of $100 million to $500 million and
liabilities of $50 million to $100 million.

The cases are assigned to Judge John K. Sherwood.

The Debtors tapped Gibbons P.C. as legal counsel; Whiteford, Taylor
& Preston, LLP as special counsel; Phoenix Executive Services, LLC,
as restructuring advisor; and Donlin Recano as claims agent.


NOBLE REY: $300K Sale of All Assets to Craft Equipment Approved
---------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas
authorized Noble Rey Brewing Co, LLC's Asset Purchase Agreement
with Craft Equipment, LLC or its designee or assignee in connection
with the sale of substantially all assets for $300,000.

A hearing on the Motion was held on April 18, 2019.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims, other
encumbrances, and interests including any such interests arising
from any Proceeding as defined in the APA, with all such liens,
claims, and interests attaching to the proceeds ultimately
attributable to the Assets.

Upon the closing of the sale, the Debtor is authorized to pay Chase
Bank the sum of $200,000 and it is also authorized to pay at
closing any outstanding ad valorem property taxes for tax year 2018
or prior.  All remaining proceeds will be held by the debtor in the
Debtor in Possession account until further order of the Court.

The Order constitutes a final and appealable order within the
meaning of 28 U.S.C. Section 158(a).

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 6004(g), any stay of the Sale Order
during the 14-day appeal period following the entry of the Order is
waived.

                    About Noble Rey Brewing Co.

Noble Rey Brewing Co., LLC, owns and operates a taproom offering
homemade beers, ciders & meads, other local brews & regular live
music.

Noble Rey Brewing Co., LLC, filed its Voluntary Petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Case No. 18-34214) on Dec. 19, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Chris Rigoulot, managing member, the Debtor estimated $50,000 in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  The Debtor's
counsel is Eric A. Liepins, P.C.


NORANDA ALUMINUM: CalFirst Wins Summary Judgment Bid vs Boh Bros.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned CALIFORNIA FIRST NATIONAL BANK v. BOH BROS.
CONSTRUCTION CO., L.L.C., SECTION: "J"(5), Civil Action No. 16-2699
(E.D. La.), District Judge Carl J. Barbier granted California First
National Bank's motion for summary judgment.

This litigation arises out of two unpaid invoices for labor and
materials Boh Bros. provided as part of an expansion project at
Noranda Alumina, LLC's plant in Gramercy, Louisiana. Noranda filed
for bankruptcy and never satisfied the invoices. Boh Bros. claims
that CalFirst, as Noranda's lender, became the owner of the Project
and that Boh Bros. and CalFirst entered into a contract that made
CalFirst liable to pay the unpaid invoices.

Boh Bros. advances two avenues of relief. First, Boh Bros. argues
that CalFirst is liable for breach of contract. This claim requires
the Court to accept several layered propositions. First, that
CalFirst is the owner of the Project by virtue of Noranda and
CalFirst's financing agreement. Second, that a "Supply Contract"
was formed by the communications between Hebert and Brown;
specifically, their e-mails regarding CalFirst's instruction that
the invoices be marked as "Sold to [CalFirst]." Third, that
CalFirst breached its implicit agreement by not paying the third
and fourth invoices.

CalFirst argues that summary judgment is appropriate because each
proposition fails. First, CalFirst disputes that the financing
arrangement was a "true lease." Rather, the arrangement was
"disguised financing," whereby the agreement--although couched in
the terms of a lease--was actually a loan secured by a security
interest in the Project. This is proved by the fact that Noranda
would own the property in exchange for a nominal purchase price of
$1 upon completing the required payment schedule.

Second, CalFirst opines that there has never been a contract
between CalFirst and Boh Bros. Boh's position is that the Lease
Agreement required a "Supply Contract." To satisfy this
requirement, Brown entered CalFirst into a "Supply Contract" with
Boh Bros. This contractual relationship was formed, says Boh Bros.,
when Hebert asked Brown whether CalFirst or Noranda was paying the
invoices. When Brown responded that Boh Bros. should use a "Sold to
California First National Bank" designation but send the invoices
to Noranda first for approval, the "Supply Contract" was formed,
and CalFirst became liable to Boh Bros. for the Project invoices,
Boh Bros. argues. CalFirst, attacks this argument on multiple
fronts, arguing that there was no intent on either side that a
contract be formed, and that even assuming there was, Brown lacked
actual or apparent authority to enter CalFirst into the alleged
"Supply Contract."

Third, CalFirst argues that even assuming all its other arguments
fail, summary judgment is warranted because CalFirst met the terms
of the alleged "Supply Contract." Hebert, Boh's representative said
to have entered into the "Supply Contract" on Boh's behalf,
testified the terms were that "CalFirst was going to be paying the
invoices on behalf of Noranda . . . after Noranda approved them."
CalFirst, argues it paid for the first two invoices, which were
approved by Noranda, but did not pay Pay Apps. Nos. 3 and 4 because
they lacked the required approval from Noranda. Citing the
testimony of Brown, Boh Bros. argues that CalFirst did not send
acceptance certificates to Noranda--a step required to set the
approval process in motion. CalFirst counters by quoting Brown, who
states the actual procedure was for Noranda to let CalFirst know
which invoices it wanted to approve, and then CalFirst would fill
out and return an acceptance certificate.

Boh's second cause of action is for detrimental reliance. Boh
claims it would not have mobilized to the site and continued
construction if it were not for CalFirst's representations that it
would pay the invoices. CalFirst argues that any representation it
made could not have resulted in Boh changing its position, because
Boh Bros. was bound by its contract to continue working on the job
until Noranda was in default.

In this case, Boh Bros. and Noranda agreed that Noranda would have
60 days to pay Boh's invoices. The earliest issued invoice that
went unpaid, was dated 11/6/15. Accordingly, it appears that
Noranda was not required to make its next payment under the
Construction Contract until January 5, 2016. Boh's work under the
Construction Contract was completed as of Nov. 24, 2015. Nothing in
the record indicates this is a case like Shaw,where Boh Bros. would
have had the right to walk away from the contract before Boh
finished its work. Thus, the Court cannot agree that Boh
"detrimentally changed its position" because of CalFirst's
representation. Rather, Boh simply fulfilled its obligations under
an existing contract, a contract that Noranda was never shown to be
in breach of while Boh was performing its work.

Moreover, the Court emphasizes that the alleged representation upon
which Boh relied was that CalFirst would pay Noranda's invoices
with Noranda's approval. As the Court found above, there is no
evidence that CalFirst ever acted contrary to this representation.
Summary judgment is warranted under the circumstances.

A copy of the Court's Order and Reasons dated Feb. 13, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2ZoZnE9 from Leagle.com.

California First National Bank, Plaintiff, represented by Mark A.
Mintz -- mmintz@joneswalker.com -- Jones Walker, Angela Lui Walsh ,
California First National Bancorp, pro hac vice & Priscilla H.
Douglas , California First National Bancorp, pro hac vice.

Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C., Defendant, represented by
Michael R.C. Riess -- mriess@rllaw.com -- Riess LeMieux, LLC &
Christy R. Bergeron -- cbergeron@rllaw.com -- Riess LeMieux, LLC.

Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C., Counter Claimant, represented
by Michael R.C. Riess , Riess LeMieux, LLC & Christy R. Bergeron ,
Riess LeMieux, LLC.

California First National Bank, Counter Defendant, represented by
Mark A. Mintz , Jones Walker, Angela Lui Walsh , California First
National Bancorp, pro hac vice & Priscilla H. Douglas , California
First National Bancorp, pro hac vice.

                    About Noranda Aluminum

Noranda Aluminum, Inc., and 10 of its affiliates filed separate
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Lead Case No.
16-10083) on Feb. 8, 2016.  The petitions were signed by Dale W.
Boyles, the chief financial officer.  Judge Barry S. Schermer is
assigned to the cases.

The Debtors have engaged Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
LLP as counsel, Carmody MacDonald P.C. as local counsel, PJT
Partners, LP as investment banker, Alvarez & Marsal North America,
LLC, as restructuring advisors and Prime Clerk LLC as claims,
solicitation and balloting agent.

The Debtors estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of
$1 billion to $10 billion.  As of the Petition Date, the Debtors
had approximately $529.6 million in outstanding principal amount of
secured indebtedness, consisting of a revolving credit facility and
a term loan facility.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee in February 2016 appointed seven
creditors of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corp. and its affiliated
debtors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors.
Lowenstein Sandler LLP serves as Committee counsel and Houlihan
Lokey Capital, Inc., serves as Committee as financial advisor and
investment banker.


NOVUM PHARMA: Sale/Abandonment Procedures of De Minimis Assets OK'd
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Kevin J. Carey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware authorized Novum Pharma, LLC's procedures in connection
with sale or abandonment of de minimis assets.

The sale is free and clear of all Liens, if any, with the valid,
perfected and unavoidable Liens of the Valid Lien Holders to attach
to proceeds of the sales.

The Debtor is authorized to sell the De Minimis Assets in
accordance with these procedures:

     a. The De Minimis Asset Sale Procedures will apply only to the
sales of De Minimis Assets in any individual transaction or series
of related transactions to a single buyer or group of related
buyers with an aggregate selling price equal to or less than
$100,000.

     b. The Debtor is authorized to consummate such transaction(s)
without further order of the Court if it determines in the
reasonable exercise of its business judgment that such sales are in
the best interests of the estate, subject to the procedures set
forth.

     c. Any such transaction(s) will be free and clear of all
Liens, if any, with the valid, perfected and unavoidable Liens of
the Valid Lien Holders to attach to proceeds of the sales.

     d. The Debtor will file and serve written the Sale Notice to
all Sale Notice Parties.

     e. The Notice Parties will have until 5:00 pm. (ET) on the
tenth day after the date of service of the Sale Notice to object to
the proposed sale.

     f. Any objection to a proposed sale must be filed and served
on (i) the Notice Parties; (ii) the Debtor; and (iii) the counsel
to the Debtor.

     g. Commencing May 31, 2019, and every month thereafter, the
Debtor will file the Monthly Report with the Court listing all
assets sold pursuant to the De Minimis Asset Sale Procedures for
the preceding month, including the names of the purchasing parties
and the types and amounts of the sales.

If no written objection from any Notice Party is received prior to
the expiration of the Notice Period, then the Debtor is authorized,
without further notice and without further Court approval, to
immediately consummate the proposed sale in accordance with the
terms of the underlying contract(s) or other document(s), and to
use the cash proceeds of such sale subject only to the rights of
Valid Lien Holders.  Upon the expiration of the Notice Period
without the receipt of any objection, the proposed sale will be
deemed final and fully authorized by the Court.

Notwithstanding the De Minimis Asset Sales Procedures described,
for any sale of De Minimis Assets with a sale price equal to or
less than $1,000, the Debtor is authorized, without following the
notice procedures required under the De Minimis Asset Sale
Procedures or otherwise providing further notice or seeking further
Court approval, to consummate the sale, and such Miscellaneous Sale
will be deemed final and fully authorized by the Court.

The Debtor is authorized to abandon De Minimis Assets in accordance
with these procedures:

     a. The Debtor will file and serve the Abandonment Notice to
the Notice Parties.

     b. The Notice Parties will have until 5:00 pm. (ET) on the
tenth day after the date of service of the Abandonment Notice to
file and serve on the Objection Parties a written objection to the
proposed abandonment.  If no written objection from any Notice
Party is received, then the Debtor is authorized to immediately
proceed with the abandonment.

     c. If a written objection to the Abandonment Notice is timely
received from any Notice Party, then the relevant De Minimis Assets
will only be abandoned upon either the consensual resolution of the
objection by the parties in question or further order of the Court
after notice and a hearing.

The Debtor is authorized to take all actions as it deems reasonably
necessary and appropriate to effectuate the relief granted pursuant
to the Order in accordance with the Motion, including paying any
necessary fees and expenses incurred in the sale or abandonment of
De Minimis Assets (including, but not limited to, commission fees
to agents, brokers, auctioneers and liquidators).

Notwithstanding any provision in the Bankruptcy Rules to the
contrary, the terms and conditions of the Order will be immediately
effective and enforceable upon its entry.

                       About Novum Pharma

Founded in 2015, Novum Pharma, LLC -- http://www.novumrx.com/-- is
a global specialty pharmaceutical company which owns a portfolio of
topical dermatology products that it purchased from Primus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in March 2015.  The dermatology products
are marketed under the names Alcortin, Alcortin A, Quinja (formerly
Aloquin) and Novacort.  Each product is a fungicidal gel used to
treat a variety of skin conditions.

Novum Pharma sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
19-10209) on Feb. 3, 2019.

Novum Pharma estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $50
million to $100 million in liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Debtor tapped Cole Schotz P.C. as general bankruptcy counsel;
CR3 Partners, LLC, as financial advisor; Teneo Capital LLC as
investment banker; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims
and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Feb. 12, 2019.  KLEHR HARRISON HARVEY
BRANZBURG LLP is the committee's counsel.


OPERATION SIMULATION: FirstBank Objects to Disclosure Statement
---------------------------------------------------------------
Secured creditor FirstBank, successor by merger to Northwest
Georgia Bank, files a limited objection to the Disclosure Statement
and Plan of Reorganization of Operation Simulation Associates.

According to the Creditor, the Debtor claims a "going concern sale"
of its businesses would net a higher value than the liquidation of
the Debtor's assets because the "goodwill" associated with a
family-run business would disappear if sold.  The Creditor
complains that the Debtor does not indicate the value of the
alleged "goodwill" or explain the significance of such goodwill to
a lumber treating business such as the Debtor.

The Creditor further complains that the Disclosure Statement
includes various assertions by the Debtor regarding its
indebtedness to FirstBank and the value of its assets, but provides
no information as to the source of such assertions.

The Creditor points out that the Debtor blames its inability to
repay its debt obligations to FirstBank on "[v]ery large fees and
interest rate escalations . . . beginning in December of 2014."
The Creditor further points out that the Debtor makes no effort to
identify the "[v]ery large fees" it asserts were applied, but the
Debtor admits to making late payments.

Moreover, the Creditor complains that the Debtor has failed to
establish all confirmation requirements of Section 1129 of the
Bankruptcy Code by a preponderance of sufficient, competent
evidence because the Debtor proposes a Plan without a realistic
possibility of success, the Debtor has not provided sufficient
evidence that the Plan complies with Title 11 or is feasible.

Attorneys for FirstBank:

     Justin Sveadas, Esq.
     Jamie Morton, Esq.
     BAKER DONELSON
     633 Chestnut Street, Suite 1900
     Chattanooga, TN 37450-1800
     Phone: (423) 209-4184
     Fax: (423) 752-9589
     Email: jsveadas@bakerdonelson.com
            jmorton@bakerdonelson.com

            About Operation Simulation Associates

Founded in 1983, Operation Simulation Associates provides software
and services for the electric power industry with clients in the
USA and worldwide.  OSA is the developer of the PowrSym family of
electric power system generation, transmission, and fuel supply
models.

Wabash Valley Wood Protection, Inc., is an Indiana corporation
founded in 2017 for the purpose of purchasing and operating the
Vincennes, Indiana pressure treating plant and distribution yard
formerly operated as a division of Babb lumber Company.  With the
acquisition, Wabash is adding a new product line of UL fire rated
lumber and plywood.

Operation Simulation Associates, based in Ringgold, Georgia, and
its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Lead
Case No. 18-14808) on Oct. 19, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Roger A. Babb, president, Operation
Simulation Associates estimated $500,000 to $1 million in assets
and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities; and Wabash Valley
Wood Protection, Inc., estimated $1 million to $10 million in
assets and liabilities.

The Hon. Shelley D. Rucker is the case judge.

David J. Fulton, Esq., at Scarborough & Fulton, serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtors.


OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS: Moody's Alters Outlook on B2 CFR to Positive
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Oppenheimer Holdings, Inc.'s B2
corporate family rating and B1 senior secured debt rating, and
changed Oppenheimer's outlook to positive from stable.

Moody's has decided to withdraw its outlook on Oppenheimer's
corporate family rating and senior secured debt rating for its own
business reasons.

Affirmations:

Issuer: Oppenheimer Holdings, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B2

Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed B1

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Oppenheimer Holdings, Inc.

Outlook, Changed To Positive From Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's said it affirmed Oppenheimer's ratings because it has
maintained a modestly profitable franchise and diversified revenue
base, and it continues to be committed towards maintaining
sufficient investment in and focus on its risk management and
compliance functions. Moody's said Oppenheimer's significant
investment in risk management and controls in recent years has
increased its operating costs, but should help reduce its
historically elevated level of regulatory compliance issues that
manifested in significant periodic regulatory penalties that
increased the volatility of its earnings and constrained its
creditworthiness. The company's debt/EBITDA (adjusted to capitalize
operating leases) was 3.8x in 2018, which is a reasonably healthy
level for its existing ratings, said Moody's.

Moody's said the change in outlook to positive from stable reflects
the potential for Oppenheimer's credit strength to improve over the
next twelve to eighteen months. Moody's said Oppenheimer's earnings
should benefit from a growing mix of advisory revenue, which tends
to have more of a recurring and stable profile than transaction
commission-based revenue. Moody's also said that Oppenheimer's
profitability has been benefiting from higher short-term interest
rates, which has resulted in higher cash sweep fees on client cash
balances. If improvements in risk management and controls are
sustained, there should be less likelihood of new regulatory
compliance issues, said Moody's.

Moody's said that Oppenheimer's ongoing consideration of creditors'
interests in its operating and strategic decision-making priorities
will remain a factor in its assessment of Oppenheimer's
creditworthiness, particularly with respect to its utilization of
excess cash holdings. Moody's said that since Oppenheimer's advisor
headcount has reduced, partly because it has removed
lower-performing advisors and those who had compliance issues, a
well-priced and well-integrated acquisition of a financial advisory
network that would benefit its scale and operating leverage could
be positive for its creditworthiness. However, an expensive
acquisition of an advisor group that has had significant compliance
issues, or of a business outside of Oppenheimer's core advisory
franchise, would be more challenging to integrate and manage, and
could be credit negative. The utilization of the excess cash to
reduce debt would be credit positive, said Moody's.

Factors that could lead to an upgrade:

  - An improvement in profitability and debt leverage derived from
    organic growth or successful M&A transactions

  - Continued improvement in advisory revenue resulting in greater

    revenue diversification with less reliance on interest rates

  - Strong demonstration of an improved risk and control framework

Factors that could lead to a downgrade:

  - Acquisitions outside of Oppenheimer's historical core
    competencies or in higher-risk business activities

  - A broad slowdown in revenue generation leading to a
Debt/EBITDA
    ratio at or above 5.5x on a sustained basis

  - Any significant new issues in risk management or litigation


PANNEL PARTNERSHIP: $3.4M Sale of Harris County Property Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jeff Bohm of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas authorized Pannel Partnership, L.P.'s sale of
approximately 13 acres of real property in Harris County, Texas and
all improvements located thereon, to Hunter Farms & Timber, LLC for
$3.4 million.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims, interests and
encumbrances.  All liens against the Property will be paid at
closing the undisputed portion of their claim.  As to the disputed
portion, the liens on the disputed amounts will attach to the sales
proceeds in their existing state and priority and subject to all
defenses thereto.

In addition, the disputed amount of the indebtedness on any liens
against the Property which is not paid at closing, will be kept
either in the Debtor's DIP account or at the title company, One
Nation Title, and will not be disbursed pending further Order of
the Court.  

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth, the sale is
subject to, and not free and clear of, the 2019 real property tax
liens.  The 2019 real property taxes on the Property will be
prorated at closing and will be assumed by the Buyer.  The 2019
real property taxes on the Property will be the sole responsibility
of the Buyer.

The Debtor is authorized to pay reasonable closing costs as part of
the sale.

Eexcept for the parties that filed timely secured proofs of claim
in the case against the Property, any party asserting a lien,
claim, interest or encumbrance will file a pleading with the
Bankruptcy Court setting forth the basis ofany lien, claim,
interest or encumbrance on the Property within 14 days of the entry
date of theOrder or any lien, claim, interest or encumbrance will
be waived.

The Court has determined that the stay imposed by Bankruptcy Rule
6004(g) will not apply to the transactions contemplated by the
Order, for good cause shown, and the Order will be effective
immediately upon entry.

Pannel Partnership, L.P., is a privately-held company engaged in
activities related to real estate.  Pannel Partnership sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.
Tex. Case No. 18-35523) on Oct. 1, 2018.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million
and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Jeff Bohm
oversees the case.  The Debtor tapped The Towber Law Firm, PLLC, as
its legal counsel.


PATRICK JOHANNES: 9th Cir. Affirms Confirmation of Ch. 11 Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned DEBORAH JOHANNES, Appellant, v.
PATRICK ALLEN JOHANNES, Appellee, No. 17-55749 (9th Cir.), the
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit affirms the district
court judgment affirming the bankruptcy court's confirmation of
Deborah Johannes' ex-husband Patrick Johannes's Chapter 11 plan.

On appeal, Deborah simply seeks an increased equalization payment
for her community property interest in a business venture; any
increased payment would be consistent with the plan's general
structure, and no third party's rights would be affected. Patrick
is not a good faith purchaser of Deborah's community property
interest for purposes of this litigation because the central issue
is the valuation of the property.

Deborah contends that the bankruptcy court made a "math error" in
calculating the value of her community property share in Foothills
Consulting, Inc. There was no such error. The bankruptcy court
accepted the total valuation of Foothills proposed by Patrick's
expert, which included a discount because of litigation against the
venture threatened by Deborah. The court then ordered an
equalization payment to Deborah equal to the expert's valuation of
her 25% share in Foothills.

Deborah argues that the bankruptcy court erred in denying her
motion for a new trial because she filed a post-trial notice
offering to waive her claims against Foothills. The court did not
abuse its discretion in deeming that filing "too little too late."
Deborah knew at least eleven days before the two-day trial in the
bankruptcy court that Patrick's expert would proffer testimony that
her threat of litigation against Foothills affected its value, but
she waited until two weeks after trial ended to file the
conditional waiver; she offered no excuses either below or on
appeal for her lack of diligence.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum dated Feb. 13, 2019 is available
at https://bit.ly/2XuxYyQ from Leagle.com.


PERFORMANCE POOL: Seeks to Hire Hiratsuka as Accountant
-------------------------------------------------------
Performance Pool Management Group, Inc. seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado to hire an
accountant.

The Debtor proposes to employ Hiratsuka & Associates, LLP to
prepare financial reports and tax returns, and provide accounting
advice necessary to administer its bankruptcy estate.

John Moran, the primary accountant who will be providing the
services, will charge an hourly fee of $180.  His associate Julie
Ehler will charge $90 per hour.

Mr. Moran disclosed in court filings that he is "disinterested" as
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Hiratsuka & Associates can be reached through:

     John Moran
     Hiratsuka & Associates, LLP
     4251 Kipling Street, Suite 410
     Wheat Ridge, CO 80033

              About Performance Pool Management Group

Locally owned and operated since 1987, Performance Pool Management
Group, Inc. -- https://www.perfpools.com – specializes in
providing pool and spa services.  It offers maintenance, repairs,
remodeling and new construction services to commercial and
residential clients.  The company is also a retailer of ProTeam
sanitizers, shocks, stabilizers, balancers and algaecides.

Performance Pool Management Group sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 19-12522) on
April 1, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed
$1,533,634 in assets and $2,288,811 in liabilities.  

The case is assigned to Judge Thomas B. McNamara.  Kutner Brinen,
P.C., is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


PERFORMANCE POOL: Taps Kutner Brinen as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Performance Pool Management Group, Inc., received approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado to hire Kutner
Brinen, P.C. as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the preparation of a plan of
reorganization; and provide other legal services in connection with
its Chapter 11 case.

The firm holds a pre-bankruptcy retainer in the amount of $15,947
for payment of post-petition fees and costs.

Jeffrey Brinen, Esq., at Kutner Brinen, disclosed in court filings
that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jeffrey S. Brinen, Esq.
     Kutner Brinen, P.C.
     1660 Lincoln St., Ste. 1850
     Denver, CO 80264
     Tel: 303-832-2400
     Email: jsb@kutnerlaw.com

              About Performance Pool Management Group

Locally owned and operated since 1987, Performance Pool Management
Group, Inc. -- https://www.perfpools.com – specializes in
providing pool and spa services.  It offers maintenance, repairs,
remodeling and new construction services to commercial and
residential clients.  The company is also a retailer of ProTeam
sanitizers, shocks, stabilizers, balancers and algaecides.

Performance Pool Management Group sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 19-12522) on
April 1, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed
$1,533,634 in assets and $2,288,811 in liabilities.  

The case is assigned to Judge Thomas B. McNamara.  Kutner Brinen,
P.C. is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


PG&E CORP: Tort Claimants Panel Taps DSI as Financial Advisor
-------------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of tort claimants of PG&E Corp. and Pacific
Gas and Electric Company seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of California to hire Development
Specialists, Inc. as its financial advisor.

The firm will advise the committee regarding the filing, processing
and estimation of tort claims, and provide other financial advisory
services with respect to the Debtors' liabilities and
claims-related work.  

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Bradley Sharp          $685  
     R. Brian Calvert       $640
     Thomas Jeremiassen     $575  
     Eric Held              $495
     Nicholas Troszak       $485  
     Shelly Cuff            $360  
     Spencer Ferrero        $350

DSI is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Bradley D. Sharp
     Development Specialists, Inc.
     Wells Fargo Center
     333 South Grand Ave., Suite 4100
     Los Angeles, CA 90071
     Phone: 213.617.2717
     Fax: 213.617.2718
     Email: bsharp@DSIConsulting.com

                    About PG&E Corporation

PG&E Corporation (NYSE: PCG) -- http://www.pgecorp.com/-- is a
Fortune 200 energy-based holding company, headquartered in San
Francisco.  It is the parent company of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, an energy company that serves 16 million Californians
across a 70,000-square-mile service area in Northern and Central
California.

As of Sept. 30, 2018, the Debtors, on a consolidated basis, had
reported $71.4 billion in assets on a book value basis and $51.7
billion in liabilities on a book value basis.

PG&E Corp. and Pacific Gas employ approximately 24,000 regular
employees, approximately 20 of whom are employed by PG&E Corp. Of
Pacific Gas' regular employees, approximately 15,000 are covered by
collective bargaining agreements with local chapters of three labor
unions: (i) the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers;
(ii) the Engineers and Scientists of California; and (iii) the
Service Employees International Union.

On Jan. 29, 2019, PG&E Corp. and its primary operating subsidiary,
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, filed voluntary Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Lead Case No. 19-30088).

PG&E Corporation and its regulated utility subsidiary, Pacific Gas
and Electric Company, said they are facing extraordinary challenges
relating to a series of catastrophic wildfires that occurred in
Northern California in 2017 and 2018. The utility said it faces an
estimated $30 billion in potential liability damages from
California's deadliest wildfires of 2017 and 2018.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP and Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP are
serving as PG&E's legal counsel, Lazard is serving as its
investment banker and AlixPartners, LLP is serving as the
restructuring advisor to PG&E. Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and
noticing agent.

In order to help support the Company through the reorganization
process, PG&E has appointed James A. Mesterharm, a managing
director at AlixPartners, LLP, and an authorized representative of
AP Services, LLC, to serve as Chief Restructuring Officer. In
addition, PG&E appointed John Boken also a Managing Director at
AlixPartners and an authorized representative of APS, to serve as
Deputy Chief Restructuring Officer. Mr. Mesterharm, Mr. Boken and
their colleagues at AlixPartners will continue to assist PG&E with
the reorganization process and related activities.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Feb. 12, 2019.  The Committee retained
Milbank LLP as counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc., as financial advisor;
Centerview Partners LLC as investment banker; and Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC as claims and noticing agent.

On Feb. 15, 2019, the U.S. trustee appointed an official committee
of tort claimants.  The tort claimants' committee is represented by
Baker & Hostetler LLP.


PHI INC: Seeks to Hire Jones Walker as Special Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
PHI, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas to hire Jones Walker LLP as its special
counsel.

The firm will provide corporate legal services, including various
corporate governance, transactional, investigatory, regulatory and
tax matters in connection with the Chapter 11 cases of PHI and its
affiliates.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Senior Partners              $450 - $550
     Partners/Special Counsel     $325 - $450
     Associates                   $250 - $350
     Legal Assistants             $115 - $195

Jones Walker received a $300,000 retainer from the Debtors.  

Mark Mintz, Esq., a partner at Jones Walker, disclosed in court
filings that his firm does not have any interests adverse to the
Debtors' estates, creditors and equity interest holders.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases, Mr.
Mintz disclosed in court filings that his firm has not agreed to a
variation of its standard or customary billing arrangements for its
employment with the Debtor, and that no Jones Walker professional
has varied his rate based on the geographic location of the
Debtors' bankruptcy cases.

Jones Walker represented the Debtors for 10 years prior to the
petition date.  The billing rates and material financial terms in
connection with such representation have not changed post-petition
other than due to annual and customary firm-wide adjustments to the
firm's hourly rates in the ordinary course of its business, Mr.
Mintz further disclosed.   

Jones Walker has consulted with the Debtors and agreed upon an
approved budget and staffing plan for the firm's engagement,
according to the Debtors' attorney.  

The firm can be reached through:

     Mark A. Mintz, Esq.
     Jones Walker LLP
     201 St. Charles Ave
     New Orleans, LA 70170-5100
     Direct: 504.582.8368
     Fax: 504.589.8368
     Email: mmintz@joneswalker.com

                          About PHI Inc.

PHI, Inc. -- http://www.phihelico.com-- is a provider of
helicopter transportation services in the oil and gas industry,
primarily transporting crews and materials, and in the healthcare
and emergency medical services industry, primarily transporting
patients.  It is a publicly held company and provides services in
the United States and abroad.  

As of the petition date, PHI owns or operates 238 aircraft
worldwide, of which 17 are leased while eight are owned by the
customer and operated by the company.  The remaining 213 are owned
by PHI.  The company employs 2,218 people, including pilots,
mechanics, medical and administrative staff.

PHI and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code Bankr. N.D. Texas Lead Case No. 19-30923) on March
14, 2019.  At the time of the filing, PHI had estimated assets of
$1 billion to $10 billion and liabilities of $500 million to $1
billion.  

The cases have been assigned to Judge Harlin DeWayne Hale.  

The companies tapped DLA Piper LLP (US) as their bankruptcy
counsel; Jones Walker LLP as regular outside counsel; Houlihan
Lokey Capital Inc. and FTI Consulting Inc. as financial advisors;
and Prime Clerk LLC as claims, noticing and solicitation agent.


QUALITY CONSTRUCTION: May 14 Plan Confirmation Objection Deadline
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Bankruptcy Court issued a revised order approving the
Disclosure Statement explaining the second amended plan of
reorganization of Quality Construction & Production, LLC, and
Quality Production Management, LLC, to move the last date for
filing written acceptances or rejections of the Plan from April 23,
2019, to May 10, and the last date for filing and serving
objections to the Plan from April 23 to May 14.

May 21, 2019 at 10:00 AM is fixed as the date and time for hearing
on confirmation of the Plan. That hearing will be held at 214
Jefferson Street, 1st Floor Courtroom, Lafayette, Louisiana.

      About Quality Construction & Production LLC

Quality Construction & Production, LLC, and its subsidiaries
operate a group of oilfield service companies in the areas of
onshore and offshore fabrication, installation, and production
operations in Youngsville, Louisiana, and together employ
approximately 850 people.  The Company's onshore fabrication
services include spool piping, production modules, manifolds, deck
extensions, and riser guards and clamps.  QCP's offshore services
include hook-ups, facilities maintenance/upgrades, compressor
installations and field welding.  Quality Construction was founded
by Nathan Granger and Troy Collins in 2001.

Quality Construction & Production, LLC, and three affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. La. Lead Case No. 18-50303) on
March 16, 2018.  In the petition signed by Nathan Granger,
president, Quality Construction estimated $10 million to $50
million in assets and debt.

The Hon. Robert Summerhays is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Weinstein & St. Germain, LLC, as their
bankruptcy counsel; Elmore Consulting, LLC, as financial
consultant; and Donlin, Recano & Company as claims and noticing
agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee for Region 5 appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors on April 23, 2018.  The Committee
hired H. Kent Aguillard as counsel.


RAVAGO HOLDINGS: Moody's Affirms B1 CFR, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed Ravago Holdings America,
Inc.'s B1 Corporate Family Rating and the B2 rating on its senior
secured bank credit facility. The outlook remains stable.

Rating affirmations:

Ravago Holdings America, Inc.

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B1

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B1-PD

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed
  B2 (LGD5 from LGD4)

Outlook actions:

Ravago Holdings America, Inc.

  Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rating affirmation reflects Ravago's consistent retained cash
flow generation and sizable market position in the fragmented
polymer distribution business, even though leverage is temporarily
elevated. The expected increase in North American polyethylene
capacity and long-lived diverse customer and supplier relationships
also support the company's stable business position with good
volume growth prospects. The ratings also consider Ravago's good
liquidity, as well as its low maintenance capex requirements due to
the asset-light business model. Capex is expected to be elevated in
2019 due to spending on a new warehouse in Texas and an expansion
in Ohio.

However, the rating is tempered by Moody's expectation for
increasing price competition as new North American polyethylene
capacity greatly exceeds demand growth, as well as further
potential swings in working capital affecting cash usage and free
cash flow. The low-margin nature of the plastics distribution
business also limits Ravago's rating. While retained cash flow
generation is strong, vast swings in working capital have resulted
in a meaningful use of cash and will periodically impact free cash
flow. The working capital increase the second half of 2018 was
unusually large as customers de-stocked due to declining oil prices
and weaker GDP growth in Europe and China. Based on reports from
plastics and polymer producers, volumes in the first quarter of
2019 are likely to be weaker than 2018. However, Moody's expects
that volumes will increase in the remainder of 2019, once demand in
China and the US return to more normalized levels.

Moody's expects Ravago to improve its adjusted debt leverage to low
four times by the end of 2019, from 4.6x at the end of 2018. This
de-leveraging is mainly due to expected decline in inventory to
more normal levels, which will reduce the outstanding amount under
the revolving credit facility. Sales growth will be mainly driven
by volumes in 2019 due to oncoming ethylene capacity on the Gulf
Coast. Ravago has started up a new distribution center in Baytown,
TX to capture greater volumes. However, price pressure on plastic
and rubber polymers will somewhat moderate earnings gains.
Furthermore, increasing labor costs and higher freight expenses may
compress margins to some extent in 2019.

Ravago's good liquidity is supported by the expectation of positive
free cash flow, cash balance of $23 million as of December 31,
2018, and a significant $870 million asset-based revolving credit
facility. Moody's expects positive free cash flow in 2019 due to
lower working capital levels. Operating cash flow should be
sufficient to fund its capital spending including the relocation of
an existing warehouse. The company reported $495 million
outstanding revolver borrowings, leaving $375 million available as
of December 31, 2018. The ABL credit agreement has a springing
fixed charge coverage ratio set at 1.1x if availability falls below
15% of the commitment, which is not projected. The $325 million
term loan due 2023 does not have any maintenance covenants and
amortizes at 1% per year. Ravago does not have a history of paying
dividends and targets to grow its business through bolt-on
acquisitions, which could raise leverage temporarily. Moody's
expects these transactions to be small and accretive.

Moody's would consider an upgrade if the company improves its
EBITDA margins to mid- to high-single digits and maintains strong
credit metrics with adjusted Debt/EBITDA sustainably below 4.0x and
Retained Cash Flow/Debt sustainably above 12%, while executing its
acquisition growth strategy.

Moody's would consider a downgrade if adjusted leverage were
sustained above 5.5x, RCF/Debt fell and remained below 8%, or if
there were substantial deterioration in liquidity.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Chemical
Industry published in March 2019.

Headquartered in Orlando, Florida, Ravago Holdings America, Inc. is
a distributer and reseller of polymers and rubber in North America
and Latin America. The company operates in two main segments,
distribution and resale. Ravago had revenues of $4.7 billion in
2018 and is a subsidiary of Ravago SA. Ravago SA is involved in the
global distribution, resale and compounding of commodity,
engineering and specialty plastic and rubber polymers.


REDIGI INC: U.S. Trustee Objects to Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------------
The United States Trustee for Region 21 objects to the disclosure
statement and proposed plan filed by Redigi, Inc.

The U.S. Trustee points out that the Debtor did not file its
January 2019 and February 2019 monthly operating report and further
points out the Debtor's December 2018 monthly operating report
reflects funds of $38.55, the Debtor has insufficient funds to pay
the U.S. Trustees fees due on April 30, 2019.

The Trustee complains that the disclosure statement should state
that the Debtor has not operated since prior to the bankruptcy
petition date and should provide the date it ceased operations.

The U.S. Trustee also complains that it cannot determine if tax
returns are current. The Trustee asserts that if so, the Debtor has
failed to obtain approval of the employment and payment of an
accountant.

According to Trustee, the disclosure statement should disclose the
Debtor's officers and directors pre-petition, post-petition and
post-confirmation and any fees paid or to be paid.

The Trustee complains that the disclosure statement contains
differing information regarding administrative claims, the
liquidation analysis states administrative claims total $100,000
while projections include administrative claims of $250,000.

The Trustee points out to the extent the Debtor needs more than
$500,000, the source of funds and financing terms should be
disclosed.

The Trustee further points out the disclosure statement fails to
provide treatment for the secured claim held by Adelman Matz, P.C.
in the amount of $102,513.88

The Trustee asserts with the exception of litigation related to
Capital Records, LLC, the disclosure statement fails to provide any
discussion regarding existing litigation disclosed on the Debtor's
schedules with an unknown value.

The Trustee complains that the disclosure statement contains
insufficient information and projections relevant to the creditor's
decision to accept or reject the Chapter 11 plan.

                     About ReDigi Inc.

ReDigi Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
16-20809) on August 3, 2016.  The petition was signed by John Mark
Ossenmacher, CEO.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had $250
in total assets and $6,590,000 in total liabilities.

The Debtor employed Shraiberg, Landau & Page, P.A. as bankruptcy
counsel, and Baker & Hostetler LLP as special counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed.


REDONDO CONSTRUCTION: CLI, Remodelco Entitled to Interest Awards
----------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Enrique S. Lamoutte denied Debtor Redondo
Construction Corporation's Position as to Overpayment to
Continental Lord, Inc. under the 15% Footnote Provision of the
Supplement to Plan of Reorganization. The Court granted in part and
denied in part, Lord's Opposition to Debtor's Position as to
Alleged Overpayment Under the 15% Footnote Provision. The court
denied Debtor's Objection to Remodelco’s Claim for Interest
Payment. The court also denied Debtor's Renewed Objection to
Reopening of the Case upon Recent Arguments Presented by Lord.

After considering the facts presented, the court concludes that
Lord and Remodelco are both entitled to their respective interest
awards. However, the parties have not placed the court in a
position to be able to determine the specific amount the interest
award component should be. In the case of Lord, the Debtor has
changed positions regarding both the principal amounts of the
pass-through claim and the interest component that corresponds to
Lord for its subcontractor claim. The footnote 1 that was included
as part of the estate's claims and causes of action, in particular
to the claim regarding the PR-2 Mayaguez, and which reads, "[a]s
per an agreement of August 15, 1994, as amended, with Continental
Lord, Inc., CLI is entitled to a 15% pass through from the recovery
by Debtor, less proportioned expenses," references the Liquidating
Agreement of August 15, 1994, as amended.

Therefore, the parties must compute how the interest component must
be distributed, "[a]s per the agreement of August 15, 1994, as
amended, with Continental Lord, Inc., CLI is entitled to a 15%
pass-through from the recovery by Debtor, less proportioned
expenses," pursuant to the principles of contractual interpretation
premised upon articles 1233- 1241of the PR Civil Code, 31 L.P.R.A.
sections 3141- 3479.

In the case for Remodelco's interest allocation, the only line item
for which the Debtor presented two different figures was for the
expense component.

The court also finds that the Debtor's arguments regarding
Remodelco's interest allocation are inconsistent with the position
it has sustained throughout the duration of the adversary
proceeding in which it represented that it had standing to assert
the subcontractor claims of Lord and Remodelco because the PRHTA
waived its Severin affirmative defense. Remodelco did not file a
proof claim and was not included as a creditor in any particular
class under the amended plan. Moreover, there was no Liquidating
Agreement between Remodelco and the Debtor that was submitted
before the court. However, despite having all of these alleged
shortcomings, the Debtor included Remodelco as a pass-through
claimant in the complaint brought forth in the adversary
proceeding, and when the funds regarding the principal amounts for
the three projects were finally disbursed in July 2012, Remodelco
received its payment as to the principal amount of its pass-through
claim. However, the Debtor nor the pass-through claimants received
the prejudgment and post-judgment interest components pertaining to
the principal amounts of their claims because that was a contested
legal issue that was being litigated and finally became resolved on
April 21, 2016.

In the case of Remodelco, the parties need to clarify the expense
component that should be deducted from the interest allocated to
Remodelco. Under scenario 1, the expense component is in the amount
of $8,666.10 resulting in a net interest payment of $65,473.57 and
under scenario 2, the expense component is in the amount of $432,
resulting in a net interest payment of $73,708.

A copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated April 8, 2019 is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb02-02887-11-2652.pdf

Redondo Construction Corporation has been in the construction
business for 30 years, and worked on many public and government
projects.  Redondo filed for chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.P.R.
Case No. 02-02887) on March 19, 2002, and the Bankruptcy Court
confirmed the Debtor's chapter 11 plan on Oct. 6, 2005.


REGENCY PARK: Liquidating Agent Seeks to Hire R.O.I. as Broker
--------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Haley, the Chapter 11 liquidating agent appointed in Regency
Park Capital 2011, Inc.'s bankruptcy case, seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona to hire a real
estate broker.

Mr. Haley proposes to employ R.O.I. Properties LLC and the firm's
real estate broker, Beth Jo Zeitzer, to market for sale the motel
owned by the Debtor in Goodyear, Ariz.

There is a stalking horse bid of $3.125 million from Jaswant Signh
Toor and a minimum bid increment for overbids of $50,000.  In light
of the stalking horse bid, R.O.I. has agreed to a commission
structure as follows:

                  Commission   Commission
     Bid Amount   Amount       Percentage
     ----------   ----------   ----------
     $3,125,000           $0           0%
     $3,175,000      $25,000      0.7874%
     $3,225,000      $50,000      1.5504%
     $3,275,000      $75,000      2.2901%
     $3,325,000     $100,000      3.0075%
     $3,375,000     $125,000      3.7037%
     $3,425,000     $150,000      4.3796%
     $3,475,000     $173,750           5%

R.O.I. will receive 50% of each overbid until the firm reaches a
maximum commission of 5%. Any bid of $3.475 million or greater will
include a 5% commission of the total purchase price.

As is customary in the industry, the real estate commission may be
shared with a buyer's broker. The listing with R.O.I. will be for a
period of six months, subject to renewed application to the court.

Ms. Zeitzer disclosed in court filings that the firm is
"disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

R.O.I. can be reached through:

     Beth Jo Zeitzer
     R.O.I. Properties LLC
     2001 E. Campbell Ave., Suite 202
     Phoenix, AZ 85016
     Phone: 602-319-1326
     Fax: 602-522-2014
     Email: info@roiproperties.com

                    About Regency Park Capital

Regency Park Capital 2011, Inc., which conducts business under the
name Super 7 Goodyear, operates the Super 8 Motel located at 840 N.
Dysart Road, Goodyear, Ariz.  The 90-room motel was purchased in
2011.  

The company operates under a franchise agreement with Super 8
Worldwide, Inc., and is subject to review to determine if it is in
compliance with the standards demanded by the franchisor.  

Regency Park Capital 2011 filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 15-15280).  Parker Schwartz,
PLLC represented the Debtor as legal counsel.

Eric M. Haley was appointed as Chapter 11 liquidating agent
pursuant to the court's order confirming the Debtor's plan of
liquidation.  Mr. Haley hired Lane & Nach, P.C. as his attorney.


REVOLUTION MONITORING: May 5 Deadline to Object to Plan
-------------------------------------------------------
The Bankruptcy Court issued an Amended Order approving the
disclosure statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan of Revolution
Monitoring, LLC, to correct the last day for filing and serving
written objections to confirmation of the Plan.

May 5, 2019, is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to confirmation of the Plan.  The original
Disclosure Statement Order indicated the date as March 5.

May 9, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. is fixed for the hearing on Confirmation
of the Plan in the Courtroom of the Honorable Harlin Hale, 1100
Commerce Street, 14th Floor, Dallas, Texas.

May 5 is also fixed as the last day for filing and serving written
acceptances or rejections of the Plan in the form of a ballot.

                About Revolution Monitoring

Revolution Monitoring is a healthcare services provider in Dallas,
Texas.

Revolution Monitoring sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 18-42152) on Sept. 27,
2018.  In the petition signed by Jeremiah Titus Vance, president,
the Debtor estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.


ROSH TISH: Seeks to Hire Sobers Law as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
Rosh Tish Ventures, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to hire Sobers Law,
PLLC, as its legal counsel.

The firm will represent the Debtor in negotiation with its
creditors; advise the Debtor concerning the sale of its assets;
assist in the preparation of a bankruptcy plan; and provide other
legal services in connection with its Chapter 11 case.

Vivian Sobers, Esq., the firm's attorney who will be handling the
case, charges an hourly fee of $400.  

Ms. Sobers disclosed in court filings that her firm is
"disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Vivian C. Sobers, Esq.
     Sobers Law, PLLC
     11 Broadway, Suite 615
     New York, NY 10004
     Telephone: (917) 225-4501
     Email: vsobers@soberslaw.com

                     About Rosh Tish Ventures

Rosh Tish Ventures LLC is a single asset realty limited liability
company formed in 2018 under the laws of the State of New York.

Rosh Tish Ventures LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-12694) on Sept. 6,
2018.  On Jan. 3, 2019, the case was transferred to the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York and was
assigned a new case number (Case No. 19-40019).

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities of less than $1 million.  

The case is assigned to Judge Nancy Hershey Lord.

Sobers Law, PLLC, is the Debtor's legal counsel.



RYDER CONTRACTING: Seeks to Hire Lawrence J. Ickes as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------------------
Ryder Contracting Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of West Virginia to hire an
accountant.

The Debtor proposes to employ Lawrence J. Ickes CPA to prepare tax
returns, schedules and other financial reports.  

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Principal                    $250
     Senior Accountants           $125
     Staff Accountants             $75
     Administrative Assistants     $60   

The firm has required a retainer fee in the amount of $1,000.

Lawrence J. Ickes does not hold any interest adverse to the
Debtor's bankruptcy estate, according to court filings.

The firm maintains an office at:

     Lawrence J. Ickes, CPA
     P.O. Box 886
     Lewisburg, WV 24901
     Office: (304) 645-5914
     Fax: (304) 645-5915
     Email: ickescpa@suddenlinkmail.com

                   About Ryder Contracting Inc.

Ryder Contracting, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Case No. 19-20087) on March 4,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $50,000.  

The case has been assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk.  The Debtor
tapped the Law Office of John Leaberry as its bankruptcy counsel.


RYDER CONTRACTING: Seeks to Hire Leaberry Law Firm as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ryder Contracting, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of West Virginia to hire Leaberry
Law Firm PLLC as its legal counsel.

The firm will assist the Debtor's management in the preparation of
a plan of reorganization; advise the management regarding the
Debtor's rights, powers and duties under the Bankruptcy Code; and
provide other legal services in connection with the Debtor's
Chapter 11 case.

Leaberry will charge an hourly fee of $300 for its services. The
firm received $2,000 to pay the filing fees.

Leaberry does not hold interest adverse to any creditor or
"party-in-interest," according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     John F. Leaberry, Esq.
     Leaberry Law Firm PLLC
     167 Patrick Street
     Lewisburg, WV 24901
     Phone: 304-645-2025
     Fax: 888-469-6631
     Email: leaberry01@yahoo.com

                   About Ryder Contracting Inc.

Ryder Contracting, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Case No. 19-20087) on March 4,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $50,000.  

The case has been assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk.  The Debtor
tapped the Law Office of John Leaberry as its bankruptcy counsel.


SAMSON RESOURCES: Court Grants Bid to Dismiss Nesses' Suit
----------------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granted the Defendants'
motions to dismiss the case captioned Mr. and Mrs. Lloyd Odell Ness
Plaintiffs, v. Samson Resources, Samson Investments, KKR (Kravis,
Kohlberg, Roberts), Magnum Hunter, Bakken Hunter, ONEOK Partners,
ONEOK, and OKS, Defendants, Case No. 4:15-cv-00063 (D.N.D.).

Plaintiffs in this action seek a litany of damages and other relief
based on largely conclusory allegations that defendants have
engaged in an industry-wide scheme to defraud royalty and other
mineral interest owners of the correct amounts owed to them on the
production of natural gas, including from oil and gas wells in
which plaintiffs have an interest. Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se
despite the court's urging that they retain counsel.

Following the first of several motions to dismiss, plaintiffs filed
a document entitled "Amendment of Complaint." But, rather than
restating and amending the allegations of the original complaint,
plaintiffs' amendment attempts to expand upon the parties that
plaintiffs claim they are suing and plead additional acts committed
in furtherance of the purported fraud--at least as best this court
can decipher it.

Plaintiffs allege in the complaint that they have an interest in
the production from a number of wells that have been drilled in
Divide County, North Dakota. The complaint alleges that defendant
Samson Resources is the operator of all but one of the wells and
defendants Bakken Hunter and Magnum Hunter are the operators of the
remaining well.

While alleging that they have an interest in the production from
the wells, plaintiffs have not alleged the basis of their claimed
interests, e.g., making reference to any deeds, leases, wills,
pooling orders, or pooling agreements that might give rise to and
govern the scope of their interests. Also, plaintiffs have not
alleged the amount of their interests.

In the amendment, plaintiffs attempt to expand upon the defendants
they claim are being sued by setting forth a long list of entities,
purportedly related to either KKR or the Samson defendants, who
have never been served and who have otherwise not appeared in this
action. Aside from that, the fourteen-page amendment sets forth
additional allegations with respect to the purported
interrelationships among the original defendants and those that
plaintiffs intend to add along with repeating a number of the
conclusory allegations of fraud and wrongdoing on the part of the
entities.

In responding to plaintiff's pleadings, most of the defendants have
taken the position that, while they believe the attempted amendment
was not proper, it does not make a difference since the complaint
would have to be dismissed as to them even if the attempted
amendment was given effect. Bakken Hunter and Magnum, on the other
hand, argue that the only viable pleading is the amendment and,
since the amendment (as opposed to the complaint) contains no
specific allegations directed to them, they must be dismissed from
the action for that reason alone.

Normally, the court would not dismiss the complaint of a pro se
plaintiff for pleading deficiencies without first affording an
opportunity to correct them. But here, plaintiffs have had more
than sufficient opportunity in responding to the initial and
supplemental motions to move to amend their pleadings--or least
offer something which suggests that they have a plausible claim if
the court was to afford them a further opportunity to amend--and
they have not done so. Further, the inability of Ness to prove to
the bankruptcy court that there was anything nefarious about the
manner in which the gas was being sold and the mineral interest
owners being compensated by Samson Resources--including the use of
the "net back" method of valuation and offsetting of the excess gas
expenses against the amounts payable on the oil production that
were the primary focus of Ness's complaints--makes it improbable
here that plaintiffs will be able to amend the pleadings to state a
plausible claim for violations of federal law or some overarching
scheme to defraud that they appear to be attempting to make. And,
if plaintiffs believe they have some other cause of action that has
not been pled, then they need to commence a new action, which may
have to be in state court unless they can satisfy the requirements
for diversity of citizenship.

A copy of the Court's Order dated Feb. 15, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2GD1ETN from Leagle.com.

Lloyd Odell Ness, as himself, propria persona, Plaintiff, pro se.
Mary Patricia Ness, as herself, propria persona, Plaintiff, pro
se.

Samson Resources, Samson Investments & KKR, Defendants, represented
byLawrence Bender, Fredrikson & Byron, PA.

Magnum Hunter & Bakken Hunter, Defendants, represented by S. Thomas
Throne, Throne Law Office, P.C., Alexis Anne Klatt, Throne Law
Office, P.C. &Jacob T. Haseman, Throne Law Office, P.C.

ONEOK Partners, ONEOK & OKS, Defendants, represented by John W.
Morrison, Jr. , Crowley Fleck PLLP.

            About Samson Resources Corporation

Samson Resources Corporation, et al., filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 15-11934) on Sept. 16,
2015.  Philip W. Cook, the executive vice president and CFO, signed
the petition.  The Debtors estimated assets and liabilities of more
than $1 billion.

Samson is an onshore oil and gas exploration and production company
with interests in various oil and gas leases primarily located in
Colorado, Louisiana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, and Wyoming.
The Operating Companies operate, or have royalty or working
interests in, approximately 8,700 oil and gas production sites.

Samson was acquired by KKR and Crestview from Charles Schusterman
in December 2011 for approximately $7.2 billion.  The investor
group provided approximately $4.1 billion in equity investments as
part of the purchase price.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP represents the Debtors as general counsel.
Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP is the Debtors' local counsel.

Alvarez & Marsal LLC acts as the Debtors' financial advisor.
Blackstone Advisory Partners L.P. serves as the Debtors' Investment
banker.  Garden City Group, LLC, serves as claims and noticing
agent to the Debtors.

Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, appointed three
creditors of Samson Resources Corp. and its affiliated debtors to
serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors.  The
Committee has tapped White & Case LLP as counsel and Farnan LLP as
local counsel.

The Debtors have filed a plan of reorganization.  The Creditors'
Committee has filed a competing plan of liquidation.  The Hon.
Christopher S. Sontchi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware entered on Feb. 13, 2017, an order confirming
Samson Resources Corporation, et al.'s plan of reorganization.


SILVER SCREEN: 2 Creditors Object to Disclosure Statement
---------------------------------------------------------
Silver Screen Supply, LLC, and HT2, LLC, object to the Disclosure
Statement for the Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization for Silver
Screen Rentals.

The Creditors object to the Approval of the Disclosure Statement
because the Debtor has failed to comply with the terms of the
Settlement Agreement.  The Creditors complain Debtor has failed to
comply with the settlement Agreement by delaying and/or insinuating
that the Creditors are requesting additional equipment.

Attorneys for Silver Screen Supply, Inc. and HT2, LLC:

     Robin B. Cheatham, Esq.
     Lisa M. Hedrick, Esq.
     ADAMS AND REESE LLP
     701 Poydras Street, Suite 4500
     New Orleans, LA 70139
     Phone: (504) 581-3234
     Fax: (504) 566-0210
     Email: robin.cheatham@arlaw.com
            lisa.hedrick@arlaw.com

         About Silver Screen Rentals, L.L.C.

Silver Screen Rentals was founded in 2009 as a full-service
location equipment rentals company in Louisiana.  Created to cater
to the specific and time-sensitive needs of the film industry,
Silver Screen offers everything a locations department needs: a
large assortment of tents, portable air conditioners and heaters,
generators, temporary flooring, tables & chairs, makeup stations,
passenger vans, carts, dollies and more.  Silver Screen now has a
new location at 5169 Southridge Parkway in Atlanta, Georgia.  In
Louisiana, Silver Screen's facility is located at 500 Edwards Ave
in New Orleans.  For more information, call 404.445.5534 or visit
www.silverscreenrentals.com

Silver Screen Rentals, L.L.C. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
E.D. La. Case No. 18-12934), on November 1, 2018. The Petition was
signed by R. Bryan Wright, manager. The case is assigned to Judge
Elizabeth W. Magner. The Debtor is represented by William H.
Patrick, III, Esq. at Heller, Draper, Patrick, Horn & Manthey LLC.
At the time of filing, the Debtor had $100,000 to $500,000 in
estimated assets and $1 million to $10 million in estimated
liabilities.


SKYMARK PROPERTIES: Plan Proposes 2 Options for Unsecureds
----------------------------------------------------------
Skymark Properties III, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Georgia a disclosure statement in
support of its chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

The Plan provides for the curing of defaults under Debtor's Note
and Security Agreement with its secured lender, and reinstatement
of those contracts, such that only the pre-petition delinquency
will be paid through Plan payments and the Debtor will resume
normal payments pursuant to the Note.

The Plan also provides for the payment of all Allowed Claims with
interest, except to the extent holders of general, unsecured claims
elect to take a discounted, lump-sum payment in settlement of their
claims, through the continued business operations of CBE.

Class IV under the plan consists of the Allowed Claims of general
unsecured creditors. Allowed Class IV Claimants will be entitled to
elect, by written notice to Debtor and Debtor's counsel within 45
days of the effective date, to receive either (a) a lump-sum
payment equal to 50% of such Allowed Class IV Claim on or before
the 90th day after the Effective Date ("Option A"), or (b) payment
in full of such Allowed Class IV Claim, with interest at the rate
of 4.5%, in quarterly installments beginning on the first day of
the second calendar quarter more than 60 days after the Effective
Date, and continuing on the first day of each calendar quarter
thereafter ("Option B"). The installment payments will be an amount
equal to the Debtor's cash on hand on the date of such payment,
less that month’s budgeted operating expenses and a reserve of
$5,000. On the date of the 12th quarterly payment, if not paid in
full prior to said date, Class IV Claimants who have elected Option
B will receive a lump sum payment of the balance due.

Class IV Claimants who do not deliver timely elections to be
treated under Option A or Option B may be treated under either
Option A or Option B in the Debtor's discretion.

The Reorganized Debtor will pay all Claims from the income from its
business operations, additional capital contributed by the
Debtor’s member, and funds restored by MGI from which real
property taxes and property renovations will be paid.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y56ebxfu from Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

                About Skymark Properties III

Skymark Properties III, LLC, is the owner of an office building
located at 1590 Adamson Parkway, Motrow, Georgia 30260.

Skymark Properties III sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 18-71708) on Dec. 28,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of $1
million to $10 million and liabilities of the same range.  The
petition was signed by Troy Wilson, authorized agent.  Wolfson
Bolton PLLC serves as the Debtor's counsel.


SOLUTIONS BY DESIGN: Taps Rodriguez Perez as Accountant
-------------------------------------------------------
Solutions By Design, Inc., received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto Rico to hire Rodriguez
Perez & Associates, Inc. as its accountant.

The firm will assist the Debtor in the preparation and review of
its monthly operating reports and tax returns; provide bookkeeping
services; prepare financial projections and analysis required to
formulate its Chapter 11 plan; and supervise its accounting affairs
and operations.

Efrain Rodríguez Jr., the firm's accountant who will be providing
the services, will charge $55 per hour.  

Mr. Rodríguez disclosed in court filings that he is
"disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

Rodriguez Perez can be reached through:

     Efrain Rodríguez Jr.
     Rodriguez Perez & Associates, Inc.
     D-11 Betances Avenue
     Hermanas Davila
     Bayamon, PR 00959.  
     Tel: (787)370-9751
     Email: rodzperez@live.com

                    About Solutions By Design

Solutions By Design Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 18-06886) on Nov. 28, 2018, disclosing
under $1 million in assets and liabilities.  The case has been
assigned to Judge Brian K. Tester.  The Debtor is represented by
Nilda M. Gonzalez Cordero, Esq., at Gonzalez Cordero Law Offices.


SPARKLE'S HAMBURGER: Unsecureds to Get Payments Over 36 Months
---------------------------------------------------------------
Sparkle's Hamburger Spot, LLC, filed an amended Chapter 11 Plan and
accompanying disclosure statement to provide that holders of
General Unsecured Claims in Class 4 will receive Pro Rata payments
of $1,200 in Cash with payments to be made semi-annually for a
period of 36 months, instead of 84 months as provided in the
original Plan.

Holders of Allowed Secured Claims in Class 1 will receive Pro Rata
payments of $1,200 in Cash with Semi-Annual Payments for a term of
72 months, instead of 84 months provided in the original Plan.

The proposed plan is contingent upon the Debtor's ability to
continue to earn income from continued operations of its casual
eateries.  SHS intends on relocating from the Emancipation
Restaurant on or about June 2019 due to the sale by the landlord of
the Emancipation Restaurant and there may be the potential loss of
customers from the Emancipation Restaurant and additional operating
costs associated with opening a new restaurant location.  The
Debtor anticipates less cash flow due to increased costs associated
with the move of the Emancipation Restaurant but expects increased
income in 2020 due to its reputation in the community and its long
standing customer base.

The Debtor rejected its lease with Didian Rentals, Inc., on October
4, 2018, for the Telephone Road Restaurant and to the extent Didian
is entitled to assert a general unsecured claim against the Debtor,
it will be treated pursuant to Paragraph 5.1.4 of the Plan as the
lease was timely rejected under 11 U.S.C. Section 365.

A redlined version of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated April
8, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y4r369ww from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for the Debtor are Adam Corral, Esq., Susan Tran, Esq.,
and Brendon Singh, Esq., at Corral Tran Singh, LLP, in Houston
Texas.

                About Sparkle's Hamburger Spot

Sparkle's Hamburger Spot, LLC, is a Texas limited liability company
incorporated on March 28, 2016 but has been in operations since
2006.  It owns and operates three casual dining restaurants that
specialize in serving made-to-order hamburgers and sandwiches.

Sparkle's Hamburger Spot sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 18-33184) on June 8,
2018.  In the petition signed by Sparkle C. Steels, manager, the
Debtor estimated assets of less than $100,000 and liabilities of
less than $500,000.


SUNTEC ALUMINUM: Seeks to Hire Cape Coral as Accountant
-------------------------------------------------------
Suntec Aluminum LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Florida to hire an accountant.

The Debtor proposes to employ Cape Coral Accounting Service, Inc.,
to assist in the preparation of its monthly operating reports, tax
returns, schedules and statement of financial affairs, operating
budget required by the Office of the U.S. Trustee, and liquidation
analysis and other items necessary for plan confirmation.

Lori Moore, the firm's accountant who will be providing the
services, will charge $175 per hour.  The retainer fee is $1,500.

Cape Coral does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor,
according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Lori L. Moore
     Cape Coral Accounting Service, Inc.
     3501 Del Prado Blvd. S, Suite 212
     Cape Coral, FL 33904
     Phone: 239-542-2558
     Fax: 239-542-2320
     Email: lmoore@capecoralaccounting.com

                     About Suntec Aluminum LLC

Suntec Aluminum LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-01888) on March 6,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of less than $500,000 and liabilities of less than $1 million.  The
case has been assigned to Judge Caryl E. Delano.  The Debtor is
represented by the Law Office of Leon A. Williamson, Jr. P.A.


TANGO TRANSPORT: Ct. Rejects Navistar Partial Summary Judgment Bid
------------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Amos L. Mazzant denied Defendants Navistar
International Corporation, Navistar Inc., Navistar Leasing Company,
Navistar Financial Corporation, Navistar Leasing Services
Corporation, and ITA Truck Sales & Services, LLC's Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment in the case captioned CHRISTOPHER MOSER as
Plan Trustee of the Trust Under the Amended Joint Plan of
Liquidation of Tango Transport, LLC, et al., v. NAVISTAR
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, et al., Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-00598
(E.D. Tex.).

In October 2014, Tango Transport, LLC; Tango Logistx, LLC; Gorman
Group, Inc.; Tango Truck Services, LLC; Tango Enterprises, Inc.;
and GMGO, LLC sued Defendants in Louisiana state court. Defendants
filed Exceptions to Tango's state-court claims. However, before the
state court heard Defendants' Exceptions, the parties executed a
Receipt, Release, and Settlement of all Claims and Indemnity
Agreement ("Settlement Agreement"). Pursuant to the Settlement
Agreement, Tango filed a Motion to Dismiss Suit with Prejudice. In
a one-sentence order, the state court granted Tango's motion and
dismissed the case with prejudice on Sept. 22, 2015.

On April 6, 2016, Tango filed a Chapter 11 Voluntary Petition for
Bankruptcy. On Nov. 18, 2016, Christopher Moser, as Plan Trustee of
the Trust under the Amended Joint Plan of Liquidation of Tango,
filed this adversary proceeding. On Dec. 19, 2017, the Court,
adopting the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Bankruptcy Judge, withdrew the reference of the adversary
proceeding to the Bankruptcy Court.

In this proceeding, the Trustee seeks to avoid the Settlement
Agreement under 11 U.S.C. section 544(b)(1), 548, and 550.  On
April 11, 2018, Defendants filed their Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment.

Defendants contend that the Fifth Circuit's holding in Besing
mandates summary judgment on the Trustee's claims as a matter of
law.

To succeed on a constructive fraudulent transfer claim under
section 548, the Trustee must show that the debtors "received less
than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for such transfer or
obligation." In Besing, the Fifth Circuit considered whether a
Texas state court's judgment constituted a transfer for reasonably
equivalent value as a matter of law.

Defendants argue the Dismissal Order operates like the Texas
sanction order and judgment in Besing. Defendants contend that as a
matter of law, the Court must enter partial summary judgment
because the Dismissal Order was an adjudication on the merits of
the Trustee's state-law claims. Therefore, Defendants claim the
Trustee cannot prove that the debtors received less than reasonably
equivalent value for their claims under section 548. The Court
disagrees as Besing is distinguishable from this case.

Besing stands for the important principle that federal courts must
respect the disposition of state-law claims by state courts.
Defendants argue that allowing the Trustee to proceed on its claims
violates the principle stated in Besing.

The Court disagrees because the "transfer" at issue occurred
because of the Settlement Agreement, not the Dismissal Order.
Further, the constructive fraud alleged by the Trustee occurred
when the parties signed the Settlement Agreement, not when the
state court granted the uncontested motion.

The Defendants' motion for summary judgment is, therefore, denied.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated Feb. 13,
2019 is available at https://bit.ly/2VYDMQG from Leagle.com.

Tango Transport, LLC, Defendant, represented by Keith William
Harvey, The Harvey Law Firm, PC.

Christopher J Moser, as Plan Trustee of the Trust under the Amended
Joint Plan of Liquidation of Tango Transport, LLC, Plaintiff,
represented by Angela J. Somers  -- asomers@rctlegal.com -- Reid
Collins & Tsai LLP, David Benjamin Thomas -- dthomas@rctlegal.com
-- Reid Collins & Tsai, LLP, J. Benjamin King , Reid Collins &
Tsai, LLP & Yonah Jaffe -- yjaffe@rctlegal.com -- Reid Collins &
Tsai LLP.

Navistar International Corporation, Navistar, Inc. & ITA Truck
Sales & Service, LLC, Defendants, represented by James Jay Lee,
Vinson & Elkins LLP, Lance Blake Williams, McCranie Sistrunk
Anzelmo Hardy McDaniel & Welch, LLC, pro hac vice, Angela Nicole
Offerman, Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC, Clayton James Callen,
Hartline Dacus Barger Dreyer, LLP, Jadd Fitzgerald Masso, Clark
Hill Strasburger, Jeffrey Scott Patterson, Hartline Dacus Barger
Dreyer, LLP, Jordan Elizabeth Jarreau, Hartline Dacus Barger
Dreyer, LLP, Kevin M. Jakopchek, Latham & Watkins LLP, Michael P.
Ridulfo, Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC, P. Michael Jung, Clark
Hill Strasburger, Quincy T. Crochet, McCranie Sistrunk Anzelmo
Hardy McDaniel & Welch, LLC & Rebecca Lynn Petereit, Vinson &
Elkins LLP.

Navistar Leasing Company, Navistar Financial Corporation & Navistar
Leasing Services Corporation, Defendants, represented by Michael P.
Ridulfo, Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC, Angela Nicole Offerman,
Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC, James Jay Lee, Vinson & Elkins
LLP, Jordan Elizabeth Jarreau, Hartline Dacus Barger Dreyer, LLP,
Lance Blake Williams, McCranie Sistrunk Anzelmo Hardy McDaniel &
Welch, LLC & Rebecca Lynn Petereit, Vinson & Elkins LLP.

Christopher J Moser, Trustee, represented by Angela J. Somers, Reid
Collins & Tsai LLP, J. Benjamin King, Reid Collins & Tsai, LLP &
Yonah Jaffe, Reid Collins & Tsai LLP.

                 About Tango Transport LLC

Tango Transport, LLC, provides dry van and flatbed services.  It
offers over-the-road truckload services; and dedicated/private
fleet conversion, expedited, third party logistics, heavy hauling,
and brokerage services. The company also provides logistic
services, including warehouse and distribution, warehouse
management, inventory control, freight payment and audit, and
transportation control services; and reverse logistics solutions.
It serves Fortune 500 companies in the United States. The company
was founded in 1991 and is based in Shreveport, Louisiana.  It
operates a terminal in Shreveport, Louisiana; and facilities in
Sibley, Louisiana; West Memphis, Arkansas; and Madisonville,
Kentucky.

Tango Transport, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 16-40642) on April 6,
2016.  The petition was signed by B.J. Gorman, president of Gorman
Group, Inc., sole member of the Debtor.  The Debtor is represented
by Keith William Harvey, Esq., at The Harvey Law Firm, P.C.  The
Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and debts of $10
million to $50 million.

On April 26, 2016, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Heller Draper Patrick
Horn & Dabney, LLC, serves as counsel while Stillwater Advisory
Group, LLC, serves as financial advisor.

On Dec. 21, 2016, the court confirmed the Debtor's joint plan of
liquidation and the plan trust agreement, which called for the
appointment of Christopher J. Moser as plan trustee.


TOWN STAR: May 7 Plan Confirmation Hearing
------------------------------------------
The Disclosure Statement explaining Town Star Holdings, LLC's
Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation is conditionally approved.

The Court will conduct a hearing on confirmation of the Plan,
including timely filed objections to confirmation, objections to
the Disclosure Statement, motions for cramdown, applications for
compensation, and motions for allowance of administrative claims on
May 7, 2019 at 10:00 AM.

Any written objections to the Disclosure Statement will be filed
and served no later than seven (7) days prior to the date of the
hearing on confirmation.  Parties in interest shall submit written
ballot accepting or rejecting the Plan no later than eight (8) days
before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.  Objections to
confirmation shall be filed and served no later than seven (7) days
before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

                About Town Star Holdings

Headquartered in Fort Myers, Florida, Town Star Holdings, LLC, owns
convenience stores.

Town Star Holdings filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla.
Case No. 19-00667) on Jan. 25, 2019.  At the time of the filing,
the Debtor estimated under $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.  The Debtor tapped Steven M. Berman, Esq., at
Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP, as its legal counsel.


VEHICLE ALIGNMENT: Secured Creditors to Get 100% Over 7 Years
-------------------------------------------------------------
Vehicle Alignment, Brake & Tires Inc. filed a second amended
Chapter 11 Plan and accompanying disclosure statement to provide
that secured creditors will be paid in in full with interest within
seven years of the Plan's effective date, instead of the four years
provided in the previously filed Plan.

A redlined version of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement dated
April 8, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y26yzrm5 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for Vehicle Alignment, Brake & Tires Inc., are William J.
Factor, Esq., and Jeffrey K. Paulsen, Esq., at Factorlaw, in
Chicago, Illinois.

                   About Vehicle Alignment

Vehicle Alignment, Brake & Tires, Inc., d/b/a Lucas Tires, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 18-12071) on April
25, 2018.  In the petition signed by its owner, Richard Lucas, the
Debtor estimated less than $50,000 in assets and $100,000 to
$500,000 in liabilities.  The Hon. Jacqueline P. Cox oversees the
case.  The Debtor is represented by William J. Factor, Esq. at the
Law Office Of William J. Factor, Ltd.


WAYNE BAILEY: Court Allows Objection to Southern Roots' PACA Claim
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse entered an order allowing
Debtor Wayne Bailey, Inc.'s objection to the Perishable
Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA) Claim of Southern Roots Farming
Company, LLC.

In its Amended PACA Claim, filed on July 17, 2018, Southern Roots
asserts a claim in the amount of $1,882,944.67 and contends that
this full amount is entitled to statutory trust protection pursuant
to PACA. The debtor's objection asserts that: 1) Southern Roots
"was not the grower of, and had no actual ownership interest in,
the 2017 sweet potato crop reflected in the invoices attached to
the PACA Proof of Claim and therefore, "Southern Roots is therefore
not eligible for PACA trust benefits;" 2) that the Grower
Agreements entered into between the debtor and Southern Roots
created payment terms in excess of those prescribed by PACA; and 3)
the payment terms contained in the Grower Agreements conflicted
with the payment terms contained in the invoices.

The CFG Financial Services, LLC objection asserts that: 1) since
Southern Roots "was not a supplier, seller or agent who transferred
ownership, possession or control of the sweet potatoes identified
in the invoices issued by Southern Roots, [Southern Roots] is not
entitled to assert the benefits of a PACA trust," and 2) the PACA
waiver executed by George Wooten is binding upon Southern Roots and
waives the PACA claim in its entirety, or alternatively, to the
extent of George Wooten's 50% ownership interest in Southern Roots.


The SP Funding, LLC Objection asserts that the Southern Roots PACA
Claim was waived by George Wooten. In the CFG Supplemental
Objection filed after the hearing held on Oct. 25, 2018, CFG
asserted an additional argument that incorporated the position of
the debtor taken in its objection by contending that the payment
terms between the parties exceeded those allowed under PACA
statutes and regulations.

In response, Southern Roots maintains that 1) it is the proper
holder of the PACA claim because it "transferred ownership,
possession or control of the potatoes," 2) the waiver executed by
George Wooten does not waive Southern Roots' PACA rights, and 3)
the payment terms between the parties do not exceed those allowed
under PACA statutes and regulations.

The competing positions of the parties direct the court's focus to
the Grower Agreements. The debtor entered into four Sweet Potato
Grower's Agreement, Right of Entity, Security Agreement and Pledge
of Collateral with Southern Roots for the 2017 growing season.

The parties do not disagree regarding the import of the "growing"
portion of the Grower Agreements. It provides terms pursuant to
which sweet potatoes are planted, grown and harvested on the
grower's land--the debtor contributes plants, labor, equipment and
expertise and the grower contributes land, pesticides, fertilizer
and cultivation expertise.

The parties clearly have agreed to a price. They have also placed
an outside due date of Dec. 1, 2017 before interest begins to
accrue. The court therefore concludes that the Grower Agreements
set forth payment terms.

Both the debtor and CFG assert that the Grower Agreement terms
which vest title in the sweet potatoes in the debtor upon harvest
and gathering of the sweet potatoes set the date of acceptance at
the point, not the later packing date asserted by Southern Roots.
The court agrees. Since the packing dates could, and the court
assumes do, in fact, significantly post date the harvest date,
i.e., in excess of 30 days, the payment terms set forth in the
Grower Agreements render the invoices PACA ineligible.

Furthermore, 7 C.F.R. section 46.46(e)(1) provides that if a
pre-transaction agreement between the parties sets forth a date in
excess of 10 days (but not more than 30) for payment, such term
must be set forth on the invoices related to the transactions.
Although the invoices set forth payment terms of 105 days, they do
not set forth the terms provided in the Growers Agreements. For
that reason as well, the invoices are PACA ineligible.

Based on the foregoing, Objections to the PACA Claim of Southern
Roots are allowed.

The bankruptcy case is in re: WAYNE BAILEY, INC., Chapter 11,
Debtor, Case No. 18-00284-5-SWH (Bankr. E.D.N.C.).

A copy of the Court's Order dated Feb. 14, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2UJOazn from Leagle.com.

Wayne Bailey, Inc., Debtor, represented by Laurie B. Biggs, Stubbs
& Perdue, PA, Gregory B. Crampton, Nicholls & Crampton, P.A.,
Joseph Zachary Frost, Stubbs & Perdue, P.A. & Trawick H. Stubbs,
Jr., Stubbs & Perdue, P.A.

John C. Bircher III, Trustee, Plan Trustee, Trustee, represented by
John C. Bircher, III, White & Allen, PA.

                 About Wayne Bailey, Inc.

Wayne Bailey, Inc., grows, packs, and ships sweet potatoes for
foodservice, retail, fresh cut, processing, and international
markets worldwide.  It also offers processed sweet potatoes,
including shreds, sticks, diced, sliced (with or without skin),
slabs (with or without skin), crinkle-cut slabs (with or without
skin), and whole peeled and puree (chilled or frozen) sweet
potatoes.  The company was founded in 1935 and is headquartered in
Chadbourn, North Carolina.  It has facilities in North Carolina,
Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas.

Wayne Bailey filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on (Bankr.
E.D.N.C. Case No. 18-00284) on January 21, 2018, listing its
estimated assets and liabilities at $10 million to $50 million
respectively. The petition was signed by George G. Wooten,
president.

Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse presides over the case.


WAYPOINT LEASING: May 16 Disclosure Statement Hearing
-----------------------------------------------------
The hearing to consider approval of the disclosure statement
explaining the Chapter 11 plan of liquidation filed by Waypoint
Leasing Holdings Ltd. and its debtor affiliates is scheduled for
May 16, 2019 at 10:00 AM.  Objections are due by May 9.

The Debtors' assets have been substantially liquidated pursuant to
four separate sale transactions, and a significant portion of those
proceeds was previously distributed to the WAC Lenders.  The Plan
contemplates a liquidation of the Debtors' estates and their
remaining assets.  The Plan's primary objective is to distribute
the bulk of the remaining sale proceeds plus any additional
proceeds or other funds that are or become available for
distribution, all in accordance with the priorities established by
the Bankruptcy Code.

On April 3, 2019, Macquarie filed an adversary complaint against
LCI Helicopters (Ireland) Limited ("LCI") alleging that LCI
breached its confidentiality obligations under its
executed nondisclosure agreement with Holdings.  Macquarie assumed
the NDA, acquiring all of the Debtors' rights and interests
thereunder, as part of the Macquarie Sale Transaction.

The adversary complaint raises two claims against LCI: (i) breach
of the NDA and (ii) tortious interference with business relations.
In support of its claims, Macquarie alleges, among other things,
that LCI breached the NDA by using confidential information to
evaluate and consummate the acquisition of the assets of WAC9
outside of the sale process sanctioned by the Bankruptcy Court and,
but for LCI's interference, Macquarie would have successfully
consummated its offer to purchase the assets of WAC9. Macquarie has
not named any of the Debtors as a party in the adversary
complaint.

William Transier shall serve as Plan Administrator for each of the
Debtors.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated April 8, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y67lbvlg from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorneys for the Debtors are Gary T. Holtzer, Esq., Robert J.
Lemons, Esq., and Kelly DiBlasi, Esq., at Weil, Gotshal & Manges
LLP, in New York.

                     About Waypoint Leasing

Waypoint Leasing -- http://waypointleasing.com/-- is a global
helicopter leasing company founded in 2013 focused on acquiring and
leasing rotary wing aircraft to helicopter operators throughout the
world.  Though the Debtors lease aircraft to operators in the
emergency medical, search and rescue, and utility sectors, the
majority of the Debtors' lessees are helicopter service providers
servicing the offshore oil and gas industry.  The company is
headquartered in Limerick, Ireland.

Waypoint Leasing Holdings Ltd. and 142 affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-13648) on Nov. 25,
2018 to facilitate the sale of the assets to a new owner.

The Debtors disclosed $1.62 billion in total assets and $1.23
billion in liabilities as of Oct. 31, 2018.

The Honorable Stuart M. Bernstein is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as counsel; Houlihan
Lokey Capital, Inc. as investment banker; FTI Consulting, Inc., as
financial advisor; Accenture LLP as corporate advisor; and Kurtzman
Carson Consultants LLC as claims and administrative agent.


WHITE EAGLE: Taps Elucidor as Expert Valuation Consultant
---------------------------------------------------------
White Eagle Asset Portfolio, LP received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to hire Elucidor, LLC
as expert valuation consultant.

The services to be provided by the firm include expert consulting
services and testimony regarding the valuation of the life
insurance portfolio of the company and its affiliates.  Howard
Zail, a partner at Elucidor, will serve as expert witness.

The firm will charge $450 per hour for partners and principals,
$175 per hour for clerical and secretarial staff, and $600 for
court appearances and depositions.

Mr. Zail and his firm are "disinterested" as defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Howard Zail
     Elucidor, LLC
     305 East 40th St, Suite 21F
     New York, NY 10016
     Tel: 212 532 6433
     Email: info@elucidor.com

                 About White Eagle Asset Portfolio

White Eagle Asset Portfolio, LP is the owner of a portfolio of 586
life insurance policies -- also known as "life settlements" with an
aggregate death benefit of approximately $2.8 billion, White Eagle
General Partner, LLC and Lamington Road Designated Activity
Company, own the partnership interests in WEAP.  White Eagle, et
al., are indirect subsidiaries of Emergent Capital, Inc., a
publicly traded company.

White Eagle Asset Portfolio filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Del. Case No. 18-12808), on Dec. 13, 2018. Affiliates LRDA and WEGP
sought bankruptcy protection mid-November 2018 (Bankr. D. Del. Case
Nos. 18-12614 to 12615).

In the petition signed by Miriam Martinez, chief financial officer,
WEAP estimated assets of $500 million to $1 billion and debt of
$100 million to $500 million.

The Hon. Kevin Gross is the case judge.  The Debtors tapped
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtors' cases.


WHITE EAGLE: Taps Grant Thornton as Accountant
----------------------------------------------
White Eagle Asset Portfolio, LP received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to hire Grant
Thornton LLP as its accountant.

The accounting services to be provided by the firm include an audit
of the financial statements of White Eagle and its affiliates.  

Grant Thornton will charge $407,450 for financial statement audits
and $46,575 for each quarterly review.

The firm is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Kelly Phillips
     Grant Thornton LLP
     1301 International Parkway, Suite 300
     Fort Lauderdale, FL 33323
     Tel: +1 954 768 9900/+1 954 331 1168
     Fax: +1 954 768 9908
     Email: kelly.phillips@us.gt.com

                 About White Eagle Asset Portfolio

White Eagle Asset Portfolio, LP is the owner of a portfolio of 586
life insurance policies -- also known as "life settlements" with an
aggregate death benefit of approximately $2.8 billion. White Eagle
General Partner, LLC and Lamington Road Designated Activity
Company, own the partnership interests in WEAP.  The companies are
indirect subsidiaries of Emergent Capital, Inc., a publicly traded
company.

White Eagle Asset Portfolio filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Del. Case No. 18-12808), on Dec. 13, 2018. Affiliates LRDA and WEGP
sought bankruptcy protection mid-November 2018 (Bankr. D. Del. Case
Nos. 18-12614 to 12615).

In the petition signed by Miriam Martinez, chief financial officer,
WEAP estimated assets of $500 million to $1 billion and debt of
$100 million to $500 million.

The Hon. Kevin Gross is the case judge.  The Debtors tapped
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtors' cases.


XPEERANT INC: Unsecureds to Get $2,000 Per Month for 60 Months
--------------------------------------------------------------
Xpeerant Incorporated, Gary Don Petty and Barbara Ann Petty filed a
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization and accompanying disclosure
statement proposing that holders of allowed unsecured claims
against Xpeerant will receive both (1) a pro-rata distribution of
$2,000  per month for 60 months;  plus (2) one share of a newly
issued preferred stock in exchange for $500 of Allowed Claim of up
to 40% of the total Claim, subject to redemption by the Debtor.

Class 3 claimants will additionally be entitled to receive
proceeds, net of fees and costs, obtained from any action
undertaken by Xpeerant to collect Avoidance Actions and net of any
unpaid or Unclassified Priority Claims.

The Plan will be funded through revenues derived from the continued
operations of Xpeerant and from the Petty's salaries from
Xpeerant.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated April 8, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y5xzupt6 from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorneys for the Debtors are Lee M. Kutner, Esq., and Maureen M.
Gerardo, Esq., at Kutner Brinen, P.C., in Denver, Colorado.

                   About Xpeerant Inc.

Headquartered in Fort Collins, Colorado, Xpeerant Incorporated is a
recruitment agency that supplies employees to companies within the
semi-conductor and technical industry.

Xpeerant Inc. filed its voluntary petition pursuant to Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case no. 18-17700) on Aug.
31, 2018.  The petition was signed by Gary Petty, authorized
representative.  At the time of filing, the Debtor disclosed
$48,215 in total assets and $1,469,565 in total liabilities.
Kutner Brinen PC, led by Lee M. Kutner, serves as counsel to the
Debtor.


YUMA ENERGY: Confirms No Material Change
----------------------------------------
Yuma Energy, Inc. has issued a press release providing that
management is unaware of any material change in the Company's
operations that would account for the recent increase in market
activity.

On April 22, 2019, Sam L. Banks resigned from his position as a
member of the Board of Directors of the Company.

                        About Yuma Energy

Yuma Energy, Inc. -- http://www.yumaenergyinc.com/-- is an
independent Houston-based exploration and production company
focused on acquiring, developing and exploring for conventional and
unconventional oil and natural gas resources.  Historically, the
Company's activities have focused on inland and onshore properties,
primarily located in central and southern Louisiana and
southeastern Texas.  Its common stock is listed on the NYSE
American under the trading symbol "YUMA."

Yuma Energy reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders
of $17.07 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a
net loss attributable to common stockholders of $6.80 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, Yuma Energy had
$77.36 million in total assets, $44.15 million in total current
liabilities, $11.43 million in total other noncurrent liabilities,
and $21.77 million in total equity.

                  Going Concern Uncertainty

Moss Adams LLP, in Houston, Texas, the Company's auditor since
2017, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 2, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company is in
default on its credit facility, has a substantial working capital
deficit, no available capital to maintain or develop its properties
and all hedging agreements have been terminated by counterparties.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.


[^] BOOK REVIEW: Full Faith and Credit: The Great S & L Debacle
---------------------------------------------------------------
Faith and Credit: The Great S & L Debacle and Other Washington
Sagas

Author: L. William Seidman
Publisher: Beard Books
Softcover: 316 Pages
List Price: $34.95
Order a copy today at
http://www.beardbooks.com/beardbooks/full_faith_and_credit.html

"My friends, there is good news and bad news.  The good news is
that the full faith and credit of the FDIC and the U.S. government
stands behind your money at the bank.  But the bad news is that
you, my fellow taxpayers, stand behind the U.S, government." Take
it from L. William Seidman, former chairman of the FDIC under the
Reagan and Bush administrations, in his irreverent Washington
memoir. Chosen by Congress to lead the S&L cleanup, the author
describes how the debacle was created and nurtured, and the
lawsuits against Charles Keating, Michael Milken, and Neil Hush
that it spawned.

The story begins in the summer of 1973 when Seidman, then a Grand
Rapids, Michigan, businessman and managing partner of one of the
country's 10 largest accounting firms, which bore his family's
name, was tapped by Nixon to be undersecretary of HUD.  Seidman had
scarcely unpacked his bags when "the summer of 1973" took on new
meaning in Washington and across the country.  Confirmation of any
of the precarious president's nominations looked dubious in the
extreme, and Seidman prepared to pack up again.  Then came a call
from the office of newly appointed Vice President Ford, Spiro
Agnew, hastily departing, had left the office in a shambles.  (Not
least to be disposed of were large cases of Scotch whiskey,
presented to Agnew by supplicants.)  Would Seidman lend his
managerial expertise for a few weeks to help a fellow Grand Rapidan
get organized?

One thing led to another in the usual Potomac way, and when Ford
advanced to the presidency, Seidman was made his assistant for
economic affairs.  That job, too, was relatively short-lived, but a
decade later he returned to Washington to head the FDIC under
Reagan.  What the author found was plenty disturbing.  The
over-optimism of the 1970s and 1980s -- in particular, he believes,
a speculative binge of real estate investing followed by recession
-- was resulting in numerous bank failures, more than 1,000 between
1986 and 1991.  Worse, disaster loomed in the sister agency that
insured savings and loan institutions; a majority of the nation's
4,000 S&Ls were on their way to bankruptcy.  What caused the S&L
crisis? Seidman, although a small-government advocate, blames a
combination of deregulation and cutbacks in the oversight agencies.
One of his many battles, for example, was with OMB, which sought
to cut the FDIC's bank supervision staff just as it had tried to
reduce the number of S&L examiners.  But he finds a silver lining
in the near catastrophe; proof of resilience.  The diversity of the
U.S. financial system is also its strength.

Seidman's memoir is as much about life inside the Beltway as it is
about financial crises, making this book, first published in 1990,
no less entertaining today.  Included are lively anecdotes of
confrontations with heavy-weight White House chief of staff John
Sununu, an interview with a wild-eyed Wyoming purchaser of FDIC
property from a liquidated bank who arrived in Seidman's office
armed with a gun to register his displeasure with the purchase (a
valid objection, the author discovered), and ambush by Secret
Service agents who converged on Seidman as he opened his window and
leaned out to watch the president's helicopter take off.

L. William Seidman was chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation from 1985 to 1991.  Under his supervision, the FDIC
closed hundreds of failed banks and savings associations as the
agency attended to a debacle that cost taxpayers roughly $200
billion.  Seidman worked for U.S. Presidents Gerald R. Ford, Ronald
Reagan and George H. W. Bush.  He was also chief commentator on
CNBC and publisher of Bank Director magazine.  He was also on the
speaking circuit, and a consultant to the Nippon Credit Bank,
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Ernst & Young, and Freddie Mac, among
others.   Seidman died May 2009.  He was 88.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2019.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***