/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/190506.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, May 6, 2019, Vol. 23, No. 125

                            Headlines

1400 NORTHSIDE: Case Summary & 10 Unsecured Creditors
219 SAGG MAIN: Case Summary & 9 Unsecured Creditors
34 HOLDING: June 26 Plan Confirmation Hearing
47 HOPS LLC: Trustee Hires Columbia Research as Special Counsel
7632 WISCASSET: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor

90 WEST STREET: Court Confirms Chapter 11 Plan
ACHAOGEN INC: Hires Cassel Salpeter as Investment Banker
AIR FORCE VILLAGE: Hires Cushman & Wakefield as Broker
AIR LEASE: Fitch Rates $250MM 6.15% Preferred Shares 'BB+'
ALL AMERICAN OIL: June 5 Plan Confirmation Hearing

ALLIANT HOLDINGS: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR Amid Incremental Loan
ALLIANT HOLDINGS: S&P Rates $505MM Sr. Secured Debt 'B'
ALTA MESA: Receives Default Notice for Failure to File Form 10-K
AMERICAN PRINTING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ARIZONA AIRCRAFT: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

ASSUREDPARTNERS INC: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR Amid Incremental Notes
AYTU BIOSCIENCE: Averaden Agrees to Perform Consulting Services
BAUSCH HEALTH: Fitch Hikes Long-Term IDR to 'B', Outlook Stable
BCP RENAISSANCE: Fitch Gives BB-(EXP) Rating to $65MM Term Loan B
BCP RENAISSANCE: Moody's Gives B1 Rating to $65MM Term Loan B

BIOSCRIP INC: Incurs $10.3 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
BLACKWOOD REDEVELOPMENT: Hires Nehmad Perrillo as Counsel
BLUE CAT CARRIERS: Seeks to Hire Seiller Waterman as Counsel
BOEAU BELLE: Seeks to Hire Jeff Wright as Accountant
BRAVEHEART REAL: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee

BROOALEXA LLC: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
CALIFORNIA RESOURCES: Widens Net Loss to $67-Mil. in 1st Quarter
CANBRIAM ENERGY: Moody's Cuts CFR to Ca & $350MM Unsec. Notes to C
CAPSTONE PEDIATRICS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
CBCS WASHINGTON: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee

CDK GLOBAL: Moody's Rates New Sr. Unsecured Notes Due 2029 'Ba1'
CENGAGE LEARNING: S&P Puts B- ICR on Watch Pos. on McGraw-Hill Deal
CHARLES RIVER: S&P Lowers ICR to 'BB+' on Citoxlab Acquisition
CHRISTIAN RADABAUGH, SR: Proposed Sale of GP Cattle Approved
COMMUNITY HEALTH: Reports First Quarter 2019 Financial Results

CONSOLIDATED INFRASTRUCTURE: Sets Bidding Procedures for All Assets
CORP.REALTY USA: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
COVIA HOLDINGS: Moody's Cuts CFR to B1 & Alters Outlook to Negative
CREDIAUTOUSA FINANCIAL: Taps Brandon Smith Law as Special Counsel
CUMBERLAND FARMS: Moody's Hikes CFR to Ba3 & Unsec. Rating to B1

CYXTERA DC: Moody's Rates $100MM Incremental 1st Lien Loan 'B1'
DELUXE ENTERTAINMENT: Moody's Alters Outlook on B3 CFR to Stable
ECOSPHERE TECHNOLOGIES: Hires Allan Kalish as Broker
EP ENERGY: Appoints New Director to Fill Vacancy
EXCO RESOURCES: Committee Taps Quinn Emanuel as Co-Counsel

F.M. BUTT HOTELS: Hires James M. Joyce, Esq. as Counsel
FANNIE MAE: Posts $2.4 Billion Net Income in First Quarter
FCH MCKINNEY: $290K Sale of McKinney Property to Treadways Approved
FERNLEY & FERNLEY: Hires Mitchell & Mitchell CPA's as Accountant
FFORDABLE BUILDING: $1.25M Sale of All Remaining Assets Approved

GARDNER DENVER: Moody's Affirms Ba3 CFR Amid Ingersoll Rand Deal
GNC HOLDINGS: Files Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31
GOGO INC: Launches $20 Million Senior Secured Notes Offering
GOODYEAR TIRE: Moody's Cuts CFR to Ba3 & Alters Outlook to Stable
GOODYEAR TIRE: S&P Alters Outlook to Neg., Affirms 'BB' Debt Rating

GRCDALLASHOMES LLC: Case Summary & 12 Unsecured Creditors
GTT COMMUNICATIONS: Fitch Affirms 'B' LT Issuer Default Rating
GUITAR CENTER: Moody's Alters Outlook on Caa1 CFR to Stable
H K FINE PROPERTIES: Cuevas Buying Baytown Property for $53K
HELIOS AND MATHESON: Swaps Warrants for 12% Debentures Due 2020

HELIOS AND MATHESON: Will be Delisted from Nasdaq
HELIOS SOFTWARE: Moody's Alters Outlook on B3 CFR to Stable
HI-CRUSH PARTNERS: Moody's Alters Outlook on B2 CFR to Negative
IDEANOMICS INC: Swings to $19.9 Million Net Income in Q1
INTERCONTINENTAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING: S&P Cuts Bond Rating to 'BB-'

K&D INDUSTRIAL: Selling Operations and Business Assets for $1.2M
KBC ENTERPRISE: Unsecureds to Get $1,500 Per Quarter for 5 Years
KENDALL FROZEN: Asks Court to Approve Employment of CMR
KNOLL'S INC: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors
KODIAK GAS: Moody's Withdraws B3 CFR on Cancelled Bond Offering

KODRENYC LLC: Plan Outline Evidentiary Hearing Set for June 21
KRONOS WORLDWIDE: Fitch Affirms 'B+' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable
LAKE BRANCH: Farm Credit Objects to Plan, Disclosures
LAKE BRANCH: MetLife Objects to Disclosure Statement
LAREDO HOUSING: S&P Puts CCC+ Rev. Bond Rating on Watch Negative

LASALLE GROUP: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
LIBERTY UNION: A.M. Best Affirms B(Fair) FSR, Alters Outlook to Pos
LOWER CADENCE: Fitch Assigns 'B+' First-Time LT IDR, Outlook Stable
MACAULEY CONTRACTING: May 23 Plan Confirmation Hearing
MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors

MCGRAW-HILL EDUCATION: S&P Affirms 'B' ICR on Cengage Merger Plan
MCGRAW-HILL GLOBAL: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR Amid Cengage Deal
MGM RESORTS: Fitch Affirms 'BB' IDR Amid Macau Unit's Notes Issue
MGM RESORTS: Moody's Affirms Ba3 CFR Amid Macau Unit's Notes Issue
MGM RESORTS: S&P Affirms BB- ICR Amid Macau Unit's Notes Issuance

MID-CITIES HOME: Seeks to Hire CR3 Partners, Appoint CRO
MISTER CAR: Moody's Cuts CFR to B3 & Alters Outlook to Stable
MUSCLEPHARM CORP: Hires Former General Electric Executive as COO
NANOMECH INC: May 6 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
NBM US: Fitch Rates Proposed 7-Year Senior Unsecured Notes 'BB-'

NEW START INCORPORATED: Hires Quintairos as Special Counsel
NORTHERN POWER: Disposes of US Service Business
ORCHIDS PAPER: Orchids Investments Offers $176M for All Assets
ORIGINCLEAR INC: Liggett & Webb, P.A. Raises Going Concern Doubt
PARTNERSHIPS TO UPLIFT: S&P Raises 2014A Rev. Bonds Rating to 'BB'

PASCO COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS: Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
PAUL F. SMITH: Taps Gary Cook as Bankruptcy Attorney
PCI GAMING: Moody's Assigns First-Time Ba3 CFR, Outlook Stable
PETSMART INC: Moody's Alters Outlook on Caa1 CFR to Stable
PHARMACYTE BIOTECH: Accumulated Deficit Raises Going Concern Doubt

PHOEBEN INC: $1.9M Sale of Substantially All Assets to Dothan OK'd
PIONEER ENERGY: Incurs $15.1 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
PLAINVILLE LIVESTOCK: James Overcash Named Chapter 11 Trustee
PLAYPOWER INC: Moody's Cuts Ratings on 1st Lien Facilities to B3
POST PRODUCTION: Asks Court to Approve 1st Amended Plan Outline

PREFERRED CARE: Taps Daniel Sherman as Consultant
PTC INC: S&P Affirms 'BB' ICR; Outlook Stable
PUC SCHOOLS, CA: S&P Affirms BB Bond Rating; Rating Off Watch Dev.
QUORUM HEALTH: Receives Noncompliance Notice from NYSE
RUBIO & ASSOCIATES: U.S. Trustee Forms 4-Member Committee

S&S FOREST CITY: Seeks to Hire Jones & Walden as Legal Counsel
SCHELL & KAMPETER: Filing of 3rd Amended Classick Suit Due May 7
SIMKAR LLC: Sandeep Gupta Appointed Chapter 11 Trustee
SIZMEK INC: Taps FTI Capital Advisors as Financial Advisor
SIZMEK INC: Taps Muchin Rosenman as Legal Counsel

SOUTH MOON BBQ: Seeks to Hire Barrick Switzer as Legal Counsel
STRAIGHT UP: Taps Winegarden Haley as Legal Counsel
SUNGARD AVAILABILITY: Case Summary & 30 Top Unsecured Creditors
SUNGARD AVAILABILITY: Moody's Cuts PDR to D-PD Amid Bankr. Filing
SYNIVERSE HOLDINGS: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B-' on Elevated Leverage

TELESCOPE MANAGEMENT: SBFC Objects to Plan, Disclosures
THE9 LIMITED: Grant Thornton Raises Going Concern Doubt
THOMSON-SHORE INC: Taps Eby Conner as Special Counsel
THOMSON-SHORE INC: Taps Goldstein Bershad as Legal Counsel
TOPAZ SOLAR: Fitch Affirms C Rating on $1.1BB Senior Secured Notes

TRIBUNE CO: Court Bars Fraudulent Transfer Claims v. Shareholders
TROIANO TRUCKING: Seeks to Hire Nickless Phillips as Legal Counsel
TWISTLEAF HOLDINGS: Seeks to Hire RPD Analytics as Appraiser
U.S. STEM CELL: Incurs $2.16-Mil. Net Loss for Year Ended Dec. 31
UNITED EMERGENCY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

USG CORP: S&P Withdraws 'BB+' ICR After Gebr Knauf Acquisition
VCLS HOLDINGS: Seeks to Hire Portfolio Real Estate as Broker
VERISIGN INC: Moody's Hikes CFR & Sr. Unsecured Debt Rating to Ba1
VISION INVESTMENT: June 19 Plan Confirmation Hearing
WEYERBACHER BREWING: Seeks to Hire Ciardi Ciardi as Counsel

WHEEL PROS: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR Amid Mobile Hi-Tech Deal
WMC MORTGAGE: May 7 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
WOODLAWN COMMUNITY: Trustee Taps Millennium Properties as Broker
WYNN RESORTS: Moody's Alters Outlook on Ba3 CFR to Positive
XPLOSION INC: Continued Losses Cast Going Concern Doubt


                            *********

1400 NORTHSIDE: Case Summary & 10 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 1400 Northside Drive, Inc.
           dba Swinging Richards
        1400 Northside Drive, NW
        Atlanta, GA 30318

Business Description: 1400 Northside Drive, Inc. owns and
                      operates a male strip club known as
                      Swinging Richards.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 2, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta)

Case No.: 19-56846

Debtor's Counsel: Paul Reece Marr, Esq.
                  PAUL REECE MARR, P.C.
                  300 Galleria Parkway, N.W., Suite 960
                  Atlanta, GA 30339
                  Tel: 770-984-2255
                  Fax: 678-623-5109
                  E-mail: paul.marr@marrlegal.com

Estimated Assets: $50,000 to $100,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Cummins Beveridge Jones, II, CEO and
CFO.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 10 unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-56846.pdf


219 SAGG MAIN: Case Summary & 9 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 219 Sagg Main LLC
        307 West 38th Street, Suite 2010
        New York, NY 10018

Business Description: 219 Sagg Main LLC owns a real property
                      located at 219 Sagaponack Main Street
                      Sagaponack, NY 11962.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 3, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of New York (Manhattan)

Case No.: 19-11444

Judge: Hon. Shelley C. Chapman

Debtor's Counsel: Joel Shafferman, Esq.
                  SHAFFERMAN & FELDMAN, LLP
                  137 Fifth Avenue, 9th Floor
                  New York, NY 10010
                  Tel: (212) 509-1802
                  Fax: 212 509-1831
                  E-mail: joel@shafeldlaw.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Benjamin Ringel, manager.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's nine unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb19-11444.pdf


34 HOLDING: June 26 Plan Confirmation Hearing
---------------------------------------------
The Bankruptcy Court has signed an order approving the Second
Amended Disclosure Statement explaining the Second Amended Chapter
11 Plan filed by 34 W 128 Funding Inc., a secured creditor of 34
Holding Corp., and scheduled the confirmation hearing to be held on
June 26, 2019 at 10:00 AM.

Class 4 General Unsecured Claims are Impaired.  The Debtor
Scheduled only one General Unsecured Claims: Andrian George, which
was Scheduled in the amount of $317,829 and was listed as disputed,
contingent and unliquidated.  As of the Bar Date, only two
unsecured proofs of claim were filed including Con Edison in the
amount of $645.60 and Adrian George in the amount of $317,829.00.

If 34 Funding is the Successful Bidder and the Property is
transferred to 34 Funding pursuant only to its Credit Bid, then 34
Funding will fund the Creditor Fund in the amount of $25,000 will
be used to pay Class 1 Claims, if any, up to in full and then Pro
Rata to holders of Allowed Class 3 unsecured Claims and Allowed
Class 4 Claims.

In the event that the Successful Bidder is a Cash bidder or the
Property is otherwise sold for cash in accordance with the Amended
Plan, then from the Sales Proceeds, after payment in full, on the
Distribution Date, of the unclassified Allowed Claims in Articles
II and III above, and payment of the Allowed 34 Funding Secured
Claim, plus post-petition amounts due to 34 Funding pursuant to
section 506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, plus the full amount set
forth in its 34 Funding Substantial Contribution Claim, then to the
extent the Webster Claim is an Allowed Secured Claim, Webster shall
be paid in full up to its Allowed Secured Claim from the Sales
Proceeds.

To the extent that any portion of 34 Funding's claim is disallowed,
34 Funding will make up in cash that disallowed portion of its
Opening Credit Bid. The Amended Plan proposes to let the market
establish the actual value of the Property through the marketing
and, if necessary, the Auction sale. However, as set forth in the
Liquidation Analysis, the Plan Proponent believes that recoveries
for creditors under this Amended Plan would exceed the
distributions, if any, in a conversion and liquidation under
Chapter 7 or a dismissal of this Case.

As of February 28, 2019, 34 Funding estimates that approximately
$100,000 in interest and legal fees became due and owing (subject
the proper filing of a substantial contribution motion pursuant to
section 503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code on notice to case parties,
and subject to allowance by the Bankruptcy Court). Thus, as of such
date, 34 Funding asserts a Claim in the amount of approximately
$1,820,000. 34 Funding has agreed to bid such amount as an opening
bid in the auction of the Property. To the extent any portion of
this opening bid amount is disallowed, 34 Funding will make up that
disallowed portion in cash as part of its opening bid at an
auction, if any.

A blacklined version of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement
dated April 24, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y46uzz23
from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for 34 W 128 Funding Inc:

     Gary O. Ravert, Esq.
     RAVERT PLLC
     116 West 23rd Street, Suite 500
     New York, NY 10011
     Tel: (646) 966-4770
     Fax: (917) 677-5419

                 About 34 Holding Corp.

Based in White Plains, New York, 34 Holding Corp., a privately held
company engaged in activities related to real estate, filed a
voluntary Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-23408)
on Sept. 11, 2018, and is represented by Amanda Medina, Esq., at
Norfolk, Connecticut.  The case is assigned to Judge Robert D.
Drain.  At the time of filing, the Debtor had $1 million to $10
million in estimated assets and liabilities.  The petition was
signed by Jeffrey I. Klein, president.  The Debtor listed Adrian
George as its sole unsecured creditor holding a claim of $317,829.


47 HOPS LLC: Trustee Hires Columbia Research as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Mel R. Codd, the Chapter 11 Trustee of 47 Hops, LLC, seeks
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District
of Washington to employ Columbia Research Corporation, as counsel
to the Trustee.

The Trustee requires Columbia Research to:

   -- conduct a 2004 examination of Anastasia MacKinnon, wife of
      Douglas MacKinnon, and a 50% owner of the Company.

   -- conduct a 2004 examination of Marina Guryanova, mother of
      Anastasia, and a recipient of loan repayments from the
      Debtor or affiliate companies for which the Debtor
      apparently has no records;

   -- conduct further investigations into payments in excess of
      $100,000 from the Debtor to a variety of contractors and
      entities related to the office building owned by Guryanova;

   -- complete additional analysis of bank records obtained
      during the course of the investigation.

Columbia Research will be paid at the hourly rate of $225.

Columbia Research will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Daniel Seligman, partner of Columbia Research Corporation, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Columbia Research can be reached at:

     Daniel Seligman, Esq.
     COLUMBIA RESEARCH CORPORATION
     P.O. Box 99249
     Seattle, WA 98139-0249
     Tel: (206) 349-4769

                         About 47 Hops

Based in Yakima, Washington, 47 Hops LLC -- https://47hops.com/ --
sells aroma and alpha hops to breweries in 38 countries around the
world.

47 Hops LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Wash. Case No. 17-02440) on Aug. 11, 2017.  In
the petition signed by Douglas MacKinnon, its president, the Debtor
disclosed $4.3 million in assets and $7.45 million in liabilities.

Judge Frank L. Kurtz oversees the case.

Catherine J Reny, Esq., and Nathan T. Riordan, Esq., at Wenokur
Riordan PLLC, serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

The official committee of unsecured creditors tapped Cairncross &
Hempelmann, P.S., as counsel.  Marcia A. Frey, the examiner
appointed in the Debtor's case, hired Hillis Clark Martin &
Peterson P.S., as counsel.

Mel R. Codd was appointed Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor.  The
Trustee tapped Southwell & O'Rourke, P.S., as his legal counsel.
Columbia Research Corporation, is the special counsel.



7632 WISCASSET: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 7632 Wiscasset Drive LLC
        7632 Wiscasset Drive
        Canoga Park, CA 91304

Business Description: 7632 Wiscasset Drive LLC is a privately
                      held company in Canoga Park, California.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 2, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (San Fernando Valley)

Case No.: 19-11090

Judge: Hon. Victoria S. Kaufman

Debtor's Counsel: Thomas B. Ure, Esq.
                  URE LAW FIRM
                  800 West 6th Street, Ste. 940
                  Los Angeles, CA 90017
                  Tel: 213-202-6070
                  Fax: 213-202-6075
                  E-mail: tbuesq@aol.com
                          tom@urelawfirm.com

Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Justin Byrd, president.

The Debtor lists NPI Debt Fund 1, LP as its sole unsecured creditor
holding a claim of $500,000.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb19-11090.pdf


90 WEST STREET: Court Confirms Chapter 11 Plan
----------------------------------------------
The Bankruptcy Court issued an order granting final approval of the
disclosure statement and confirmation of the further amended
Chapter 11 plan of 90 West Street, LLC.

Any and all objections to the Plan of  not previously withdrawn be
and are
overruled.

The provisions of the Plan shall bind the Debtor, and all creditors
of the Debtor, whether or not such creditors have filed proofs of
claim or are deemed to have filed proofs of claim.

Pursuant to section 1146 of the Bankruptcy Code, the sale of the
Property to Purchaser shall not be subject to tax under any law
imposing a stamp tax, real estate transfer tax, mortgage recording
tax or similar tax, as such conveyance is a transfer made pursuant
to a Chapter11 plan that has been confirmed.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated March
13, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y6cguw89 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                  About 90 West Street

90 West Street LLC is a privately-held company in Brooklyn, New
York, engaged in activities related to real estate.  It owns the
real property occupied by its affiliate Woodbriar Health Center
LLC, which operates a nursing home facility located at 90 West
Street, Wilmington, Massachusetts.  

The company, together with WHC, was organized in March 2015 to
acquire the facility for $22 million.  The acquisition included
both the real property on which the facility is located and the
nursing home itself.  90 West Street is related to Keen Equities,
which sought bankruptcy protection on Nov. 12, 2013 (Bankr.
E.D.N.Y. Case No. 13-46782).

90 West Street sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-40515) on Jan. 30, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Y.C. Rubin, chief restructuring officer, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.

Judge Carla E. Craig presides over the case.  90 West Street tapped
Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP as its legal counsel.


ACHAOGEN INC: Hires Cassel Salpeter as Investment Banker
--------------------------------------------------------
Achaogen, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware to employ Cassel Salpeter & Co., LLC, as
investment banker to the Debtor.

Achaogen, Inc., requires Cassel Salpeter to:

   a. review and analyze the Debtor's business, operations and
      financial projections;

   b. attend meetings of the Board of Directors of the Company
      with respect to matters on which Cassel Salpeter
      has been engaged to advise;

   c. provide testimony, as necessary, with respect to matters on
      which Cassel Salpeter has been engaged to advise in any
      proceeding before the Court;

   d. assist in the preparation of materials, describing the
      Debtor's industry, business strategy, business and
      management, and incorporating current financial and other
      appropriate information furnished by the Debtor;

   e. assist the Debtor with market testing the debtor-in-
      possession financing currently anticipated from Silicon
      Valley Bank, or, if such financing is not obtained from
      Silicon Valley Bank, identifying and evaluating alternative
      candidates for potential debtor-in-possession financing;

   f. assist in creating a teaser and confidential information
      memorandum to be distributed to potential bidders;

   g. assist the Debtor in identifying and evaluating candidates
      for any potential Sale Transaction;

   h. advise the Debtor in connection with negotiations, and
      aiding in the consummation of any such Sale Transaction;

   i. advise with regards to possible affiliations with strategic
      partners;

   j. advise with regards to divestitures of non-strategic
      assets;

   k. assist or cooperate in the drafting and/or review of any
      materials for submission to the Bankruptcy Court,
      creditors, or other parties in interest related to any Sale
      Transaction or the process therefor; and

   l. provide testimony, as necessary, with respect to matters on
      which we have been engaged to advise hereunder in any
      proceeding before the Bankruptcy Court.

Cassel Salpeter will be paid as follows:

   a. Advisory Fee: A non-refundable, $200,000 fee which shall be
      due and earned in full on the date of execution of this
      Agreement, provided, however, that such Advisory Fee shall
      be payable by check or wire transfer in immediately
      available U.S. funds, as follows: $100,000 on the date
      hereof; $50,000 on the first monthly anniversary hereafter;
      and $50,000 on the second monthly anniversary hereafter;
      and provided further, however, that in the event of
      expiration or termination of this Agreement prior to the
      payment in full of this $200,000 Advisory Fee, then any
      remaining unpaid portion of such Advisory Fee owing
      hereunder shall be payable upon such expiration or
      termination of this Agreement.

   b. Sale Transaction Fee: If the Debtor consummates a Sale
      Transaction, the Debtor shall pay to Cassel Salpeter a sale
      transaction fee (the "Sale Transaction Fee"), payable by
      check or wire transfer in immediately available U.S. funds
      at the closing of the Sale Transaction, equal to the
      greater of (x) $500,000 or (y) the sum of (i) 3% of the
      Sale Consideration (as defined in Exhibit A) up to $30
      million; and (ii) 4.5% of the Sale Consideration in excess
      of $30 million. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event
      any Sale Transaction(s) includes deferred and/or contingent
      payment(s), the Debtor shall pay to Cassel Salpeter the
      portion of any Sale Transaction Fee relating thereto,
      payable in cash by check or wire transfer in immediately
      available U.S. funds, if and when such deferred and/or
      contingent payment(s) is actually paid.

   c. Multiple Closings: If more than one Sale Transaction is
      consummated, Cassel Salpeter shall be compensated based on
      the aggregate Consideration of all Sale Transactions,
      calculated in the manner set forth in the Engagement
      Letter.

   d. Fee Obligation: Cassel Salpeter shall be entitled to the
      foregoing fees with respect to any Sale Transaction
      consummated during the Term, or within six (6) months after
      the date of any termination or expiration of the Engagement
      Letter, provided, however, that in the event of any proper
      termination of the Engagement Letter by the Debtor for
      cause prior to the expiration of the Engagement Letter,
      Cassel Salpeter shall not be entitled to any Sale
      Transaction Fee for any Sale Transaction that is
      consummated within six (6) months after the date of any
      such proper termination of the Engagement Letter for cause.

   e. Lenders: In consideration for Cassel Salpeter's agreement
      to render services to the Debtor under the terms of the
      Engagement Letter, the Debtor's prepetition and debtor-in-
      possession lenders (the "DIP Lender") has agreed that (a)
      Cassel Salpeter's fees and expenses may be paid to Cassel
      Salpeter free and clear of any lien, claim or interest that
      such DIP Lender may have in the Debtor's assets or the
      proceeds thereof; and (b) in the event that Cassel Salpeter
      becomes entitled to any fees in connection with a Sale
      Transaction, such DIP Lenders agree to fully subordinate
      their right to payment of their debt (whether principal,
      interest or other costs or charges) or any other recovery
      on its claims to the payment of all fees and expenses due
      to Cassel Salpeter under the Engagement Letter.

   f. Expenses: The Debtor agrees to promptly reimburse Cassel
      Salpeter, upon request, which shall be made no less than
      monthly, for all reasonable and documented out-of-pocket
      expenses incurred by Cassel Salpeter in connection with the
      Engagement Letter or the performance therefor, whether or
      not any Sale Transaction, or other type of transaction is
      consummated, including, but not limited, to, travel and
      lodging, databases, fees and disbursements of Cassel
      Salpeter's counsel and any other consultants and advisors
      retained by Cassel Salpeter after consultation with and
      agreement by the Debtor. All fees and reimbursable expenses
      due to Cassel Salpeter shall have no offsets, are non-
      refundable and non-cancelable. Cassel Salpeter shall not
      incur unpaid expenses pursuant to the Engagement Letter in
      excess of $20,000 without having obtained the Debtor's
      prior written consent to incur such expenses.

James S. Cassel, chairman and co-founder of Cassel Salpeter & Co.,
LLC, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as
the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and
does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its
estates.

Cassel Salpeter can be reached at:

     James S. Cassel
     CASSEL SALPETER & CO., LLC
     801 Brickell Avenue
     Miami, FL 33131
     Tel: (305) 438-7700
     Fax: (305) 438-7710

                       About Achaogen

South San Francisco, California-based Achaogen, Inc. --
http://www.achaogen.com/-- is a biopharmaceutical company focused
on the discovery, development, and commercialization of innovative
antibacterial treatments against multi-drug resistant gram-negative
infections.

Achaogen, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del., Lead Case No. 19-10844) on April
25, 2019.  The petition was signed by Blake Wise, chief executive
officer.  As of Jan. 31, 2019, the Debtor disclosed assets of
$91,607,000 and liabilities of $119,956,000.

The case is assigned to Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon.

The Debtor tapped Hogan Lovells US LLP as its bankruptcy counsel;
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP as co-counsel; Meru LLC as
financial advisor; Cassel Salpeter & Co., LLC as investment banker;
and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims, noticing and
solicitation agent.


AIR FORCE VILLAGE: Hires Cushman & Wakefield as Broker
------------------------------------------------------
Air Force Village West, Inc., d/b/a Altavita Village, seeks
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District
of California to employ Cushman & Wakefield US, Inc., as broker to
the Debtor.

Air Force Village requires Cushman & Wakefield to market and sell
the Debtor's real property located at 17050 Arnold Drive, Riverside
CA 92518.

Cushman & Wakefield will be paid a commission of 1.5% of the total
sales price.

Cushman & Wakefield will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Allen McMurtry, a partner at Cushman & Wakefield US, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Cushman & Wakefield can be reached at:

     Allen McMurtry
     CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD US, INC.
     201 North Franklin Street, Suite 3300
     Tampa, FL 33602-5163
     Tel: (813) 349-8349

                  About Air Force Village West
                     d/b/a Altavita Village

Air Force Village West -- https://livealtavita.org/ -- owns and
operates a continuing care retirement community with assisted
living, independent living, skilled nursing and memory care
services.  Air Force Village is a not-for-profit entity opened in
1989.

Air Force Village West, Inc., based in Riverside, CA, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-11920) on March
10, 2019.  The petition was signed by Mary Carruthers, chairman of
the Board.  In its petition, the Debtor estimated $50 million to
$100 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Hon. Scott C
Clarkson oversees the case.  Samuel R. Maizel, Esq., at Dentons US
LLP, serves as bankruptcy counsel.


AIR LEASE: Fitch Rates $250MM 6.15% Preferred Shares 'BB+'
----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a final rating of 'BB+' to Air Lease
Corporation's issuance of $250 million 6.150% fixed-to-floating
rate perpetual non-cumulative preferred shares.

The preferred shares represent unsecured obligations, ranking
junior to and subordinated in right of payment to Air Lease's
current and future senior and subordinated indebtedness.
Distributions on the preferred shares are non-cumulative. Unless
distributions have been declared on the preferred shares, Air Lease
may not declare or pay distributions on its common shares except
under certain circumstances. The preferred shares are perpetual in
nature but may be redeemed, at Air Lease's option, five-years after
the issuance. Proceeds from the issuance will be used for general
corporate purposes.

The assignment of the final rating follows the receipt of documents
conforming to information already received. The final rating is the
same as the expected rating assigned to the preferred shares on
February 26, 2019.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

IDR AND PREFERRED SHARES

The final rating assigned to the preferred shares is two notches
below Air Lease's Long-Term Issuer Default Rating of 'BBB', in
accordance with Fitch's 'Corporate Hybrids Treatment and Notching
Criteria' dated Nov. 9, 2018. The preferred share rating includes
two notches for loss severity, reflecting the preferred shares'
deep subordination and heightened risk of non-performance relative
to other obligations, namely unsecured debt.

Fitch has afforded the issuance 100% equity credit given the
non-cumulative nature of the distributions, the fact that the
preferred shares are perpetual, and the lack of change of control
provisions and events of default. As a result of the issuance, Air
Lease's debt to tangible equity leverage improved modestly to 2.3x
from 2.4x, as of Dec. 31, 2018, which is below management's
long-term articulated target of 2.5x.

The issuer has the option to redeem the proposed preferred shares
in full prior to February 2024, in case of adverse rating agency
treatment of the shares. Air Lease may redeem the preferred shares
in whole or in part on or after February 2024; however,
shareholders will not have the right to require the redemption or
repurchase of the preferred stock.

Air Lease's current ratings take into account the company's high
quality commercial aircraft portfolio, strong funding profile with
a meaningful portion of unsecured debt and peer-superior leverage,
which is expected to persist over the long term. Air Lease's credit
strengths also include its above-average scale, strong and stable
profitability supported by long-term contractual lease streams,
demonstrated management track record at Air Lease and predecessor
organizations, and enhanced risk management framework.

The ratings are constrained by elevated key person risk; funding
and placement risks associated with the company's outsized order
book; above-average lessee exposure to China; and above-average
widebody exposure.

Rating constraints applicable to the aircraft leasing industry more
broadly include the monoline nature of the business; vulnerability
to exogenous shocks; potential exposure to residual value risk;
sensitivity to oil prices; reliance on wholesale funding sources;
and increased competition.

The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch's expectations that Air Lease
will maintain a young, high quality aircraft portfolio, which
limits residual value risk, as well as above-average scale, a
strong funding profile with a meaningful portion of unsecured debt
and peer-superior leverage. These positive attributes are offset by
Air Lease's large order book, which will require consistent access
to the capital markets. Fitch expects that Air Lease will maintain
sufficient liquidity to fund the order book.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

IDR AND PREFERRED SHARES

The rating on the preferred shares is primarily sensitive to
changes in Air Lease's Long-Term IDR and is expected to move in
tandem. However, the preferred shares rating could be downgraded by
an additional notch to reflect further structural subordination
should the firm consider hybrid issuances.

Positive rating momentum for the IDR, although likely limited to
the 'BBB' rating category, could be driven by a perceived reduction
in key person risk, while maintaining leverage around 2.5x,
unsecured debt to total debt at or around current levels and
contractual cash flow to debt of between 100% and 115%. In
addition, positive rating momentum could arise from a material
reduction in the size of the order book relative to the owned fleet
and maintenance of robust liquidity, particularly with respect to
near-term funding obligations.

Negative rating pressure could arise from a material increase in
secured debt levels; leverage approaching or above 3.0x, resulting
from capital returns, aircraft impairments or a higher risk
appetite; a sustained deterioration in financial performance and/or
operating cash flows; higher-than-expected repossession activity;
difficulty re-leasing aircraft or the order book at economical
rates; a reduction in available liquidity or unencumbered assets;
and/or an inability to maintain the fleet profile in terms of
average age and narrowbody/widebody composition.

A key person event with respect to Mr. Hazy or Mr. Plueger would
not necessarily result in an immediate downgrade, but would be
evaluated in the context of the potential impacts on Air Lease's
strategic direction, industry relationships and risk appetite. The
key person risk is somewhat mitigated because it resides with two
individuals rather than one.

Fitch has assigned the following rating:

Air Lease Corporation

  -- Preferred Shares 'BB+'.

Fitch currently rates Air Lease as follows:

Air Lease Corporation

  -- Long-Term IDR 'BBB';

  -- Senior secured debt 'BBB+';

  -- Senior unsecured debt 'BBB'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


ALL AMERICAN OIL: June 5 Plan Confirmation Hearing
--------------------------------------------------
The Disclosure Statement of All American Oil & Gas Incorporated, et
al., is approved.  The Confirmation Hearing at which the Court will
consider confirmation of the Plan will be held before the Honorable
Ronald B. King, United States Bankruptcy Judge, in the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas, San
Antonio Division, 615 E. Houston St., Courtroom 1, San Antonio,
Texas 78205 on June 5, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. (prevailing Central
time).

The deadline for filing objections to confirmation of the Plan will
be May 29, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Central time).

Class 5 - General Unsecured Claims. Each Holder of an Allowed
General Unsecured Claim shall receive, in full and final
satisfaction of its Allowed General Unsecured Claim, its Pro Rata
share of net proceeds of the ORRI, if any, as and when such net
proceeds are received by the Liquidating Trustee, following payment
in full of all Allowed Administrative Tax Claims, Allowed Priority
Tax Claims, Allowed Other Priority Claims, and Allowed Other
Secured Claims, until such Holder’s General Unsecured Claim is
paid in full.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated April 24, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/yxmxmfrr from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtors are Deborah D. Williamson, Esq., Patrick L.
Huffstickler, Esq., Danielle N. Rushing, Esq., at Dykema Gossett
PLLC, San Antonio, Texas; and Richard L. Wynne, Esq., Bennett L.
Spiegel, Esq., Erin N. Brady, Esq., at Hogan Lovells US LLP, in Los
Angeles, California.

               About All American Oil & Gas

All American Oil & Gas Inc. -- https://www.aaoginc.com -- is an
independent oil company headquartered in San Antonio, Texas.  It
holds and provides shared administrative and accounting services to
its two wholly-owned subsidiaries Kern River Holdings Inc. and
Western Power & Steam, Inc.  

KRH is an exploration and production company that utilizes a
state-of-the-art steam flood to extract oil within a 215-acre
leasehold, with 110 acres currently under steam flood, in the Kern
River Oil Field.  WPS is a power company that operates a
20-megawatt cogeneration facility, which -- in addition to selling
power to Pacific Gas & Electric -- provides KRH with both
electricity and steam (generated from waste heat) to aid its
extraction of oil.

All American Oil & Gas sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Texas Lead Case No. 18-52693) on Nov.
12, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtors had estimated
assets of $100 million to $500 million and liabilities of the same
range.

The cases are assigned to Judge Ronald B. King.

The Debtors tapped Dykema Gossett PLLC and Hogan Lovells US, LLP as
legal counsel; Houlihan Lokey as financial advisor; and BMC Group,
Inc., as notice, claims and balloting agent.


ALLIANT HOLDINGS: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR Amid Incremental Loan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed the B3 corporate family
rating and B3-PD probability of default rating of Alliant Holdings
Intermediate, LLC, a subsidiary of Alliant Holdings, L.P. following
the company's announcement that it plans to issue an incremental
$505 million first-lien senior secured term loan (rated B2).
Alliant will use proceeds from the incremental borrowing to repay
revolver borrowings and repurchase equity. In the same action,
Moody's affirmed the B2 ratings on the senior secured revolving
credit facility and the first-lien term loan and the Caa2 rating on
its senior unsecured notes. The outlook for Alliant is stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Alliant's ratings reflect its leading position in several niche
markets, steady organic revenue growth and strong operating
margins, said the rating agency. The company's emphasis on
specialty programs, where the broker offers distinct value to both
insurance buyers and insurance carriers, has been a successful
strategy. Alliant continues to build its specialty and middle
market insurance business by expanding through a mix of organic
growth, lateral hires and acquisitions. The company has reported
strong revenue growth, healthy EBITDA margins, and good
free-cash-flow-to-debt metrics. These strengths are offset by
aggressive financial leverage and moderate interest coverage, along
with its contingent/legal risk related to lateral hires (seasoned
producers, mostly with specialty books of business) and acquisition
integration risk. The company also faces potential liabilities from
errors and omissions, a risk inherent in professional services.

Giving effect to the incremental borrowing, Alliant will have pro
forma debt-to EBITDA of just above 8.0x, (EBITDA - capex) interest
coverage of about 2.0x, and free-cash-flow-to-debt in the
mid-single digits, according to Moody's estimates. The rating
agency expects that Alliant will reduce its leverage through EBITDA
growth over the next few quarters. These pro forma metrics reflect
Moody's accounting adjustments for operating leases, contingent
earnout obligations, certain other non-recurring and unusual items,
and run-rate EBITDA from acquisitions. The rating agency views
Alliant's leverage as aggressive for its rating category, leaving
little room for error in integrating acquired operations.

Factors that could lead to an upgrade of Alliant's ratings include:
(i) debt-to-EBITDA ratio below 6.5x, (ii) (EBITDA - capex) coverage
of interest exceeding 2x, and (iii) free-cash-flow-to-debt ratio
exceeding 5%.

Factors that could lead to a rating downgrade include: (i)
debt-to-EBITDA ratio above 8x, (ii) (EBITDA - capex) coverage of
interest below 1.2x, or (iii) free-cash-flow-to-debt ratio below
2%.

Moody's has affirmed the following ratings of Alliant Holdings
Intermediate, LLC:

  Corporate family rating at B3;

  Probability of default rating at B3-PD;

  $685 million senior unsecured notes maturing in August 2023 at
  Caa2 (LGD6 from LGD5) (Co-issuer: Alliant Holdings Co-Issuer,
  Inc.);

  $200 million senior secured revolving credit facility maturing
  in May 2023 at B2 (LGD3);

  $2,071 million senior secured term loan maturing in May 2025
  at B2 (LGD3).

Moody's has assigned the following ratings to Alliant Holdings
Intermediate, LLC:

  $505 million six-year senior secured term loan at B2 (LGD3).

The outlook is stable.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Insurance
Brokers and Service Companies published in June 2018.

Alliant, based in Newport Beach, California, is a specialty
oriented insurance broker providing property & casualty and
employee benefits products and services to middle-market clients
across the US. The company generated revenue of $1.35 billion for
2018.


ALLIANT HOLDINGS: S&P Rates $505MM Sr. Secured Debt 'B'
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it has assigned its 'B' senior secured
debt rating to Alliant Holdings Intermediate LLC's proposed $505
million incremental term loan B due 2025. It also assigned a '3'
recovery rating, indicating an expectation of meaningful (50%-70%;
rounded estimate: 50%) recovery in case of default. The incremental
term loan is nonfungible with the company's existing term loan B
and is subject to the same terms and conditions.

Alliant is issuing the proposed $505 million incremental debt,
along with $57.5 million of new common equity, to repurchase equity
from Stone Point Capital LLC and co-investors, repay outstanding
revolver balance, and for general corporate purposes. Alliant's
leverage as of year-end 2018 pro forma for the incremental debt
deteriorates to 7.9x from 7x, but remains consistent with S&P's
current ratings tolerances. Coverage also deteriorated modestly to
about 2.0x pro forma for the new debt (and including interest from
the new payment-in-kind toggle preferred instrument issued in
January 2019) from about 2.6x at year-end 2018. S&P expects modest
deleveraging over the next year, with leverage of 7.0x-7.3x by
year-end 2019 through organic growth and earnings momentum.

Consistent with its favorable track record, Alliant performed well
in 2018. Total revenue was up about 20% for the year, 10% of which
was organic. Robust organic growth was fostered by strong retention
and new business trends in its specialty niches and continued
lateral hire success. S&P adjusted margins remained favorable and
steady at about 33.5% for the year. Acquisition activity was also
robust and included two platform acquisitions (national specialty
insurance broker Crystal & Co., and insurance consultant and due
diligence advisor Harbor Group Consulting) and five tuck-in
transactions throughout 2018.

  Alliant Holdings, L.P.
  Alliant Holdings Intermediate, LLC.

  Issuer Credit Rating                    B/Stable/--

  New Rating
  Alliant Holdings Intermediate, LLC.

  Senior Secured
  US$505 mil term loan B bank in due 2025 B
  Recovery Rating                        3(50%)


ALTA MESA: Receives Default Notice for Failure to File Form 10-K
----------------------------------------------------------------
Alta Mesa Holdings, LP and Alta Mesa Finance Services Corp., both
indirect subsidiaries of AMR, acknowledged receipt of a notice from
the trustee under that certain indenture, dated as of Dec. 8, 2016,
governing the Issuers' 7.875% Senior Notes due 2024, among the
Issuers, U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, and each of
the subsidiary guarantors party thereto that the failure to file
the AMH Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended Dec.
31, 2018 by the date set forth in the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission constitutes a
default under Section 3.10 of the Indenture.  The Indenture
provides that the 10-K Default will give rise to an event of
default under Section 6.1(4) of the Indenture if it continues for
30 days following the date of receipt of the Notice.  Accordingly,
if AMH is unable to file the AMH Form 10-K by May 19, 2019, the
trustee may at any time after that date, and is required if
directed by the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the
Notes, declare the principal of, premium, if any, and accrued and
unpaid interest, if any, on all the Notes to be due and payable.

If the 10-K Default ripens into an event of default under the
Indenture, it would constitute an event of default under Section
7.01(d) of the Eighth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, among
AMH, the lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent and issuing lender, dated as
of Feb. 9, 2018 (the "AMH RBL").  Furthermore, AMH did not furnish
to the administrative agent and each lender the financial items and
related deliveries required under Section 5.06(a) of the AMH RBL by
April 30, 2019.  This failure constitutes a default under the AMH
RBL.  If such Delivery Default remains unremedied on May 31, 2019,
it would constitute an event of default under Section 7.01(c)(ii)
of the AMH RBL.  After the occurrence and during the continuance of
any of the above-described events of default under the AMH RBL, if
one arises, the administrative agent shall at the request, or may
with the consent of a majority of the lenders, by notice to AMH (i)
declare all lender obligations to make extensions of credit to be
terminated and (ii) declare all principal, interest, fees,
reimbursements, indemnifications and all other amounts payable
under the AMH RBL due and payable.

AMH said it is working diligently to furnish the items required
under the Indenture and the AMH RBL.

                         About Alta Mesa

Headquartered in Houston, Texas, Alta Mesa Holdings, LP --
http://www.altamesa.net/-- is an independent energy company
focused on the development and acquisition of unconventional oil
and natural gas reserves in the Anadarko Basin in Oklahoma and
provides midstream energy services, including crude oil and gas
gathering, processing and marketing to producers in the STACK play
region through Kingfisher Midstream, LLC.

Alta Mesa reported a net loss of $77.66 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of $167.9 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of Sept. 30, 2018, Alta Mesa had
$2.95 billion in total assets, $916.07 million in total
liabilities, and $2.04 billion in total partners' capital.

                            *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on Feb. 26, 2019, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded Alta Mesa Holdings, LP's (Alta Mesa) Corporate Family
Rating (CFR) to Caa1 from B2.  "The downgrade reflects Alta Mesa's
heavy deficit funded development strategy in 2018 that resulted in
very large projected negative free cash flow and raised concerns
about capital efficiency and declining liquidity, as well as the
sudden departure of Alta Mesa's long-standing senior management
team," said Sajjad Alam, Moody's Senior Analyst.


AMERICAN PRINTING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: American Printing Company, Inc.
        428 Industrial Lane
        Birmingham, AL 35211

Business Description: American Printing Company, Inc. --
                      http://americanprintingco.net--
                      is a printing company headquartered
                      in Birmingham, Alabama.  The Company offers
                      pre-press services, such as scanning, CTP
                      technology, color retouching, stochastic and

                      sublima printing, hi-fi mixed process,
                      delano, and apogeex.  It also provides
                      finishing, specialty coatings, specialty
                      process, direct mail and fulfillment
                      services.  American Printing is a family-run

                      business founded in 1912.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 3, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Alabama (Birmingham)

Case No.: 19-01844

Judge: Hon. Tamara O. Mitchell

Debtor's Counsel: Bill D. Bensinger, Esq.
                  CHRISTIAN & SMALL, LLP
                  1800 Financial Center
                  505 North 20th Street
                  Birmingham, AL 35203
                  Tel: 205-250-6626
                       205-795-6588
                  Fax: 205-328-7234
                  E-mail: bdbensinger@csattorneys.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Robert Stanford, president and CEO.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb19-01844.pdf


ARIZONA AIRCRAFT: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
---------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Arizona Aircraft Painting, LLC
        4911 E Falcon Dr
        Mesa, AZ 85215

Business Description: Arizona Aircraft Painting specializes in all
                      aerospace performance coatings, combined
                      with the latest in spray technology.  The
                      Company has a fully integrated, pressurized,
                      and automatically climate controlled paint
                      booth, which keeps the temperature and
                      humidity constant for optimal painting
                      conditions.  The Company also offers design
                      services, interior refurbishment, vortex
                      generators, aircraft cleaning & detailing
                      services, and window replacement services.
                      Arizona Aircraft Painting operates out of
                      a 10,000 square foot facility in Mesa,
                      Arizona.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 3, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Arizona (Phoenix)

Case No.: 19-05477

Judge: Hon. Daniel P. Collins

Debtor's Counsel: Ronald J. Ellett, Esq.
                  ELLETT LAW OFFICES, P.C.
                  2999 North 44th Street, Suite 330
                  Phoenix, AZ 85018
                  Tel: 602-235-9510
                  Fax: 602-235-9098
                  E-mail: rjellett@ellettlaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $500,000 to $1 million

The petition was signed by Steven Head, member.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb19-05477.pdf


ASSUREDPARTNERS INC: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR Amid Incremental Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed the B3 corporate family
rating and B3-PD probability of default rating of AssuredPartners,
Inc. following the company's announcement that it plans to issue an
incremental $475 million in new senior notes (rated Caa2). The
company will use proceeds from the incremental borrowing to help
fund a partial recapitalization led by GTCR, repay revolving credit
facilities, pay related fees and expenses and fund acquisitions. In
the same action, Moody's affirmed the B2 rating on the senior
secured revolving credit facility and the first-lien term loan and
the Caa2 ratings on its existing senior notes. AssuredPartners also
plans to increase its first-lien delayed draw facilities by $250
million for working capital and general corporate purposes,
including to fund acquisitions. The outlook for AssuredPartners is
stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

According to Moody's, AssuredPartners' ratings reflect its growing
presence in middle market insurance brokerage, its good mix of
business across property & casualty and employee benefits, and
healthy EBITDA margins. The company has made organizational changes
to improve its organic growth, which Moody's expects will be in the
low single digits through 2019. AssuredPartners is an active
acquirer, having completed over 40 acquisitions in 2018 with total
revenues rising 25% to $1.1 billion in 2018. The company allows
acquired brokers to operate fairly autonomously, maintain their
local and regional brands, while centralizing the accounting and
controls function, as well as certain carrier relationships.

Tempering these strengths are the company's large volume of
acquisitions coupled with aggressive financial leverage and
significant cash outflows related to contingent earnout
liabilities. Given the company's high volume of acquisitions, its
existing and acquired operations face potential liabilities from
errors and omissions in the delivery of professional services. The
company's EBITDA margin has declined in recent periods as the
company absorbs its largest acquisition, Keenan. Given the
persistently high financial leverage, the company has little room
for error in managing its existing and acquired operations.

Giving effect to the proposed incremental borrowing and associated
acquired EBITDA, Moody's estimates that AssuredPartners' has a pro
forma debt-to-EBITDA ratio higher than 7.5x, with (EBITDA - capex)
interest coverage of around 2x and a free-cash-flow-to-debt ratio
in the low single digits. These pro forma metrics include Moody's
accounting adjustments for operating leases, deferred earnout
obligations, run-rate earnings from completed acquisitions and
certain non-recurring costs. Moody's expects the company to reduce
its debt-to-EBITDA ratio below 7.5x over the next few quarters
through continued EBITDA growth and slight amortization of the term
loan. While the performance-based deferred earnout arrangements
promote growth among the company's acquired brokers, they also add
to its financial leverage and near-term cash outflows.

Factors that could lead to an upgrade of AssuredPartners' ratings
include: (i) debt-to-EBITDA ratio below 6x, (ii) (EBITDA - capex)
coverage of interest consistently exceeding 2x, and (iii)
free-cash-flow-to-debt ratio exceeding 5%.

Factors that could lead to a rating downgrade include: (i)
debt-to-EBITDA ratio remaining above 7.5x, (ii) (EBITDA - capex)
coverage of interest below 1.2x, or (iii) free-cash-flow-to-debt
ratio below 2%.

Moody's affirmed the following ratings:

  Corporate family rating at B3;

  Probability of default rating at B3-PD;

  $267.5 million ($193 million outstanding as of 4/26/19)
  senior secured revolving credit facility maturing in October
  2022 at B2 (LGD3);

  $1.7 billion senior secured term loan maturing in October
  2024 at B2 (LGD3);

  $500 million senior unsecured notes maturing in August 2025
  at Caa2 (LGD5).

Moody's has assigned the following ratings (and loss given default
(LGD) assessments):

  $267.5 million senior secured five-year revolving credit
  facility at B2 (LGD3);

  $250 million delayed draw senior secured five-year term loan
  at B2 (LGD3);

  $475 million senior unsecured eight-year notes at Caa2 (LGD5).

As part of the financing, the company will repay and terminate the
existing revolving credit facility.

The outlook for the issuer is stable.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Insurance
Brokers and Service Companies published in June 2018.

Based in Lake Mary, Florida, AssuredPartners ranks among the 15
largest US insurance brokers. The company generated revenue of $1.1
billion for 2018.


AYTU BIOSCIENCE: Averaden Agrees to Perform Consulting Services
---------------------------------------------------------------
Aytu BioScience, Inc. has entered into an Independent Contractor
Services Agreement with Averaden, LLC, pursuant to which Averaden
Contractor agrees to perform certain consulting services with
respect to corporate business development activities for the
Company.  In return, the Company has agreed to pay the Contractor
$8,400 per month, which amount shall not exceed $110,000 in
aggregate.  The Agreement will terminate on May 15, 2020.

Gary Cantrell, a member of the board of directors of the Company,
is a principal of the Contractor.  Mr. Cantrell will continue to
serve as a member of the Board and the Compensation Committee of
the Company, but has resigned from the Company's Audit Committee in
order to comply with the audit committee independence rules of
Nasdaq and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                      About Aytu BioScience

Englewood, Colorado-based Aytu BioScience, Inc. (OTCMKTS:AYTU) --
http://www.aytubio.com/-- is a commercial-stage specialty
pharmaceutical company focused on global commercialization of novel
products addressing significant medical needs.  The company
currently markets Natesto, the only FDA-approved nasal formulation
of testosterone for men with hypogonadism, ZolpiMist, an
FDA-approved, commercial-stage prescription sleep aid indicated for
the short-term treatment of insomnia characterized by difficulties
with sleep initiation, and recently acquired Tuzistra XR, the only
FDA-approved 12-hour codeine-based antitussive oral suspension.
Additionally, Aytu is developing MiOXSYS, a novel, rapid semen
analysis system with the potential to become a standard of care for
the diagnosis and management of male infertility caused by
oxidative stress.  MiOXSYS is commercialized outside of the U.S.
where it is a CE Marked, Health Canada cleared, Australian TGA
approved, Mexican COFEPRAS approved product, and Aytu is planning
U.S.-based clinical trials in pursuit of 510k de novo medical
device clearance by the FDA. Aytu's strategy is to continue
building its portfolio of revenue-generating products, leveraging
its focused commercial team and expertise to build leading brands
within large, growing markets.

Aytu Bioscience reported a net loss of $10.18 million for the year
ended June 30, 2018, compared to a net loss of $22.50 million for
the year ended June 30, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, Aytu Bioscience
had $42.39 million in total assets, $22.50 million in total
liabilities, and $19.89 million in total stockholders' equity.

EKS&H LLLP, in Denver, Colorado, the Company's auditor since 2015,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2018,
citing that the Company has suffered recurring losses from
operations and has an accumulated deficit that raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


BAUSCH HEALTH: Fitch Hikes Long-Term IDR to 'B', Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded Bausch Health Companies Inc.'s and
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.'s Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings to
'B' from 'B-'. Fitch has also upgraded BHC's secured debt to
'BB'/'RR1' from 'BB-'/'RR1' and unsecured debt to 'B'/'RR4' from
'B-'/'RR4'. The ratings apply to approximately $24.6 billion of
debt outstanding at Dec. 31, 2018. The Rating Outlook is Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Good Progress in Business Turn-around: The upgrade reflects
Bausch's progress in stabilizing operations and reducing debt since
mid-2016. The company is poised to return the dermatology business
to profitable growth in 2019-2020. Throughout the business
turn-around, BHC consistently generated strong FCF relative to the
'B' category rating, pushed its nearest large debt maturity out
until 2022, and loosened restrictive secured debt covenants through
refinancing transactions. The company's stronger operating profile
and consistent cash generation should enable it to further reduce
leverage in the near term.

Lingering High Leverage: The balance sheet is highly leveraged due
to the funding of past acquisitions and EBITDA growth hampered by
operational issues under prior management. The company has made
good progress in reducing the absolute level of debt outstanding,
having reduced debt by approximately $7.8 billion since March 31,
2016 with a combination of internally generated cash flow and
proceeds from asset divestitures. Leverage remains modestly high
for the 'B' rating, with current gross debt to EBITDA of
approximately 7.2x; however, Fitch expects the company will
continue to pay down term loan balances with cash on hand in
2019-2020.

Return to Growth in 2019-2020: Bausch operates with a reasonably
diverse business model relative to its products, customers and
geographies served. Many of the company's businesses are comprised
of defensible product portfolios, which Fitch believes are capable
of generating durable margins and cash flows. While the loss of
patent protection on some of BHC's branded drugs will be a drag on
growth in 2019, Fitch believes that the expected long-term growth
for Bausch's eye health (Bausch + Lomb/International) and
gastrointestinal (GI/Salix) businesses support the company's
operating prospects. Further supporting the operating outlook,
Fitch expects that 2019 will be an inflection point for the
dermatology business, which generated 7.5% of total sales in 2018.
Growth of the dermatology business will be tied to the successful
commercialization of recently launched products.

Reliance on New Products: The stabilization of Bausch's operating
profile has involved an increased focus on developing an internal
research and development pipeline, which Fitch believes is
constructive for the company's credit profile over the long term.
This strategy is not without risk since Bausch needs to ramp up the
utilization of recently-approved products through successful
commercialization efforts. These products include Siliq (for the
treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, although with
safety restrictions), Bryhali (plaque psoriasis), Lumify (red eye)
and Vyzulta (glaucoma). The recent approval of Duobrii or IDP-118
(plaque psoriasis) should also help to strengthen the company's
dermatology business.

Near-Term Maturities Manageable: Bausch consistently generates
significant positive FCF (LTM FCF margin of 15.1%) and has
satisfied debt maturities until 2022 aside from annual amortization
recruitments on the term loans of about $300 million annually. The
company's ability to access the credit markets for unsecured notes
issues in late 2017 and early 2018 was an important step forward
for the prospects of refinancing shorter dated maturities.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Bausch, rated 'B'/Stable, is significantly larger and more
diversified than speciality pharmaceutical industry peers
Mallinckrodt plc ('bb-*'/Outlook Negative) and Endo International
plc Endo ('b-*'/Outlook Stable). While all three manufacture and
market specialty pharmaceuticals and have maturing pharmaceutical
products, Bausch Health's Bausch + Lomb (B+L) business meaningfully
decreases business concentration risk relative to Mallinckrodt and
Endo. B+L offers operational diversification in terms of
geographies and payers. Many of its products are purchased directly
by customers without the requirement of a prescription.

However, Bausch's rating also reflects gross debt leverage that is
higher than peers. The company accumulated a significant amount of
debt through numerous acquisitions. In addition, Bausch had a
number of missteps in the integration process and other operational
issues. New management has been focusing on reducing leverage by
applying operating cash flow and divestiture proceeds to debt
reduction and returning the business to organic growth through
internal product development efforts.

Fitch links the ratings of Bausch Health Companies Inc. (parent)
and Bausch Health Americas, Inc. (subsidiary), and assigns the same
'B' Long-Term IDR to both entities. The linkage reflects the strong
legal and operational ties between the parent and the subsidiary.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  -- Forecasted revenue returning to growth in 2019-2020. Fitch
     expects the loss of exclusivity (LOE) on products will be
     a roughly $400 million headwind to revenues in 2019 and
     forecasts total revenue growth of less than 1%. The growth
     of Siliq, Bryhali and potentially Duobrii should help return
     the dermatology business to growth in 2019-2020;

  -- EBITDA of $3.4 billion in 2019 and increasing during the
     intermediate term, driven by revenue growth, improved
     sales mix and cost control;

  -- Normalized annual FCF of $1.2 billion to $1.3 billion;

  -- Continued debt reduction utilizing FCF;

  -- Leverage declining to below 7.0x by the end of 2019.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- An expectation of gross debt leverage (total debt/EBITDA)
     durably below 6.0x and lease adjusted leverage (total
     adjusted debt/EBITDAR) durably below 6.5x;

  -- Bausch continues to maintain a stable operating profile and
     refrains from pursuing large, leveraging transactions
     including acquisitions;

  -- Forecasted FCF remains significantly positive;

  -- Debt maturities are successfully addressed well in advance
     through a combination of debt reduction and refinancing.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- Gross debt leverage (total debt/EBITDA) durably above 7.0x
     and lease adjusted leverage (total adjusted debt/EBITDAR)
     persisting above 7.5x;

  -- Material operational stress returns without a clear path
     to stabilize in the near term;

  -- FCF significantly and durably deteriorates;

  -- Refinancing risk increases and the prospect for meaningful
     leverage reduction weakens.

LIQUIDITY

Bausch had adequate near-term liquidity at Dec. 31, 2018, including
cash on hand of $723 million and roughly $980 million availability
under its $1.225 billion revolving credit facility that matures on
June 1, 2023. Availability was reduced by $75 million of revolver
borrowings and approximately $170 million in letters of credit. The
company's refinancing activities have largely satisfied debt
maturities until 2022. Fitch estimates that Bausch currently has
debt maturities and loan amortizations of roughly $127 million in
2019, $303 million in 2020, $303 million in 2021 and $1.55 billion
in 2022.

Fitch forecasts 2019 FCF of $1.0 billion to $1.1 billion, and the
rating incorporates an expectation that the company will continue
to prioritize use of cash for debt reduction ahead of acquisitions
or share repurchases. Bausch has consistently generated
significantly positive FCF during 2015-2018, despite facing serious
operating challenges. Fitch expects the company to maintain
adequate headroom under the debt agreement financial maintenance
covenants during the 2019-2022 forecast period.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has upgraded the following ratings:

Bausch Health Companies Inc.

  -- Long-term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'B' from 'B-';

  -- Senior secured notes to 'BB'/'RR1' from 'BB-'/'RR1';

  -- Senior unsecured notes to 'B'/'RR4' from 'B-'/'RR4'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

  -- Long-term IDR to 'B' from 'B-';

  -- Senior secured bank facility to 'BB'/'RR1' from 'BB-'/'RR1';

  -- Senior unsecured notes to 'B'/'RR4' from 'B-'/'RR4'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

Recovery Assumptions

The recovery analysis assumes that Bausch would be considered a
going concern in bankruptcy and that the company would be
reorganized rather than liquidated. Fitch estimates a going concern
enterprise value of $19.1 billion for Bausch and assumes that
administrative claims consume 10% of this value in the recovery
analysis.

The going concern EV is based upon estimates of post-reorganization
EBITDA and the assignment of an EBITDA multiple. Fitch's estimate
of Bausch's going concern EBITDA of $2.55 billion is 32% lower than
the estimated 2019 EBITDA, reflecting a scenario where the recent
stabilization in the base business is reversed and the company is
not successful in commercializing the R&D pipeline.

Fitch assumes Bausch will receive a going-concern recovery multiple
of 7.5x EBITDA. This is slightly higher than the 6.0x-7.0x Fitch
typically assigns to specialty pharmaceutical manufacturers,
representing Bausch + Lomb's relatively more durable consumer
products focus and the company's larger scale and broader product
portfolio than peers. The current average 2018 forward trading
multiple of Bausch and the company's closet peers is 9.9x.

Fitch applies a waterfall analysis to the going concern EV based on
the relative claims of the debt in the capital structure, and
assumes that the company would fully draw the revolvers in a
bankruptcy scenario. The senior secured credit facility, including
the term loans and revolver, and senior secured notes, have
outstanding recovery prospects of 100% in a reorganization scenario
and are rated 'BB'/'RR1', three notches above the IDR. The senior
unsecured notes recover 38% and are rated 'B'/'RR4'.


BCP RENAISSANCE: Fitch Gives BB-(EXP) Rating to $65MM Term Loan B
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the debt rating and Recovery Rating on
the senior secured debt issued by BCP Renaissance Parent, LLC and
assigned an expected 'BB-(EXP)' debt issue rating and 'RR3'
Recovery Rating to BCP's new $65 million senior secured term loan B
due 2024. The Rating Outlooks are Stable.

RATING RATIONALE

The ratings reflect the completion of pipeline construction,
start-up operations to provide natural gas transportation to
several natural gas shippers under long-term contracts, reliance on
about one-half of cash flow from weak credit quality shipping
counterparties and significant refinance risk in 2024 that has
increased due to new additional debt at BCP. Fitch has revised its
base and rating cases to take into account the additional debt,
reduced cash flow due to higher-than-forecast ad valorem taxes and
a more favorable view of near-term volumes based on Rover
Pipeline's (Rover) market position as an exporting gas pipeline
from the rapidly growing Marcellus region. Under revised rating
case assumptions, leverage at maturity is 7.5x, consistent with the
assigned rating.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Fixed-Price Contracts - Revenue Risk: Midrange: Revenue risk
primarily reflects the sub-investment-grade credit quality of the
shipper counterparties, with revenues split almost evenly between
shippers rated at or above the 'BB' rating level and those that are
rated either below the 'BB' rating level or not rated by Fitch. The
pricing structure of the take-or-pay agreements provides revenue
stability so long as the shippers remain solvent. In the event that
a shipper is unable to meet its commitments, Rover would be forced
to remarket capacity at prevailing market rates, which may
demonstrate high volatility. The potential for a longer-term
reduction in demand and the prospect of competing pipeline
development could put downward pressure on the pricing of any
remarketed capacity.

Abundant Natural Gas - Supply Risk: Midrange: Fitch believes Rover
should be able to remarket capacity based on the fundamental
economics of the Marcellus and Utica shale production regions,
particularly in the near to medium term when Rover represents one
of the only available transportation options for the contracted
shippers. Rover provides shippers with access to multiple regions
of steady industrial demand and gas storage locations such that
shipper netbacks would improve considerably versus local markets
that are oversupplied due to a lack of takeaway capacity. The
competitive position of Rover should support full utilization of
the pipeline system going forward, even if pricing is lower than
originally contracted following any potential shipper bankruptcy.

Established Operating Profile - Operation Risk: Midrange: Operation
risk is generally low based on the evaluation of the independent
technical expert, the asset's low complexity, the use of
conventional technology and the operator's extensive experience.
Tempering the otherwise low-risk operating profile is the
green-field nature of the pipeline system and the lack of risk
transfer from the Rover operating company to third parties.

High Leverage and Refinance risk - Debt Structure: Weaker: BCP's
debt structure includes initially high leverage, variable interest
rate risk, and significant refinancing risk. The term loans employ
a partially amortizing structure that triggers a balloon payment at
maturity, and BCP's ability to refinance will be dependent upon the
efficacy of a cash sweep. Financial metrics are generally robust
during the seven-year tenor of the term loans, but BCP's project
life coverage ratio around the time of debt maturity falls near 1x
under rating case assumptions. The risk of structural subordination
of BCP's indebtedness to Rover is low due to lack of distribution
covenants at Rover in conjunction with restrictions on additional
indebtedness and capiex activity.

Financial Profile

DSCRs average 1.4x under rating case conditions during the tenor of
the term loans and average 2.2x in the post-refinancing period,
reflecting the benefit of the flexible repayment profile and the
long-term value of Rover's contracts. Leverage at term loan debt
maturity in these conditions is from 7.5x. Leverage does not
decline below 4.0x until 2032 based on Fitch's assumption that debt
at maturity is refinanced in a similar structure.

PEER GROUP

Fitch has assigned investment-grade ratings to comparable pipeline
systems, such as Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC
(BBB-/Negative), Ruby Pipeline LLC (BBB-/Negative) and Rockies
Express Pipeline, LLC (BBB-/Stable). BCP's initial leverage exceeds
10x, which is considerably weaker than the leverage under 4.0x
exhibited by these higher rated peers that also generally have a
stronger mix of shipper counterparties and also higher exposure to
take-or-pay contracts rolling-off in the next two years.
Additionally, debt at the peer pipelines is directly at the
operating level. Fitch recognizes the potential for BCP to rapidly
de-lever under the term loans, suggesting that BCP has some
capacity to improve the capital structure over time if economic
conditions are favorable and the shipper contracts remain in
force.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action:

  -- Increased exposure to material merchant risk following a
     hypothetical shipper bankruptcy, such that Rover is forced
     to remarket capacity at lower-than-contracted pricing;

  -- Adverse market conditions that interfere with BCP's ability
     to meet target amortization levels and/or refinance the
     balloon maturity in 2024, particularly if leverage exceeds
     8x absent mitigating factors;

  -- Additional indebtedness at Rover that is not offset by an
     increase in revenue, such that cash distributions to BCP
     fall materially below base case levels.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action:

  -- Financial performance that allows BCP to consistently meet
     targeted amortization and reduce leverage below 5.0x;

  -- Improvement in the credit quality of the shipper
     counterparties to the 'BB' rating category, such that the
     proportion of contracted revenue exceeds 75% of total
     projected revenue.

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

BCP Renaissance Parent LLC is a special purpose company created to
finance and acquire a minority equity interest in the Rover
pipeline project, which consists of a greenfield 713-mile
interstate pipeline designed to transport 3.25 bcfd of natural gas.
The pipeline is primarily situated in northern Ohio, extending from
the Vector Pipeline interconnection in southeastern Michigan to
Ohio's eastern border, with laterals reaching into West Virginia
and Pennsylvania. The project has contracted 98% of the pipeline's
capacity with nine natural gas producers/shippers under long-term
take-or-pay agreements with 15-20-year terms. An affiliate of ETP
Legacy, LP (ETP) is operating the project.

The $1.25 billion senior secured term loan financed the sponsor's
acquisition of a 32.435% ownership interest in the Rover pipeline
from ETP, the previous majority owner. The proceeds of the
financing funded the acquisition payment, the sponsor's share of
construction costs, interest during construction and the debt
service reserve.

CREDIT UPDATE

BCP is raising $65 million in senior secured debt that ranks pari
passu with the existing senior secured debt. Loan provisions for
the new debt are expected to mirror the existing debt. BCP will use
the proceeds to make a distribution to affiliates of the ultimate
parent, Blackstone Group, L.P.

Ad valorem taxes at Rover are higher than expected, which will
reduce distributions to BCP by about $9 million annually through
2033.

BCP reports that revenues from one shipper are up about 6% from
earlier projections due to additional contracts but that spot sales
are about $4 million lower than forecast due to lower than planned
spot prices.  

The additional debt, which raises overall debt and interest
expense, leads to a higher debt balance at term loan maturity in
2024 than previously forecast. Lower distributions from Rover along
with a cash flow sweep holiday until the third quarter of 2019
exacerbate the additional debt to increase leverage in all years in
Fitch's revised base and rating cases.

Marcellus and Utica production remains solid. The U.S. Energy
Information Agency reports that natural gas production in the
Marcellus increased 13% from March 2018 to March 2019. Growth in
the Utica basin over the same period was 21%. Part of the reason
for the increase is the growth in exports out of the region by way
of new pipeline capacity including Rover and other new pipes. Given
the glut of natural gas production in the Marcellus, shippers on
Rover and other new export pipes are able to sell their volumes to
higher price markets and improve their netback position, which
supports increased production.  

Rover's market impact is as expected. Market data indicate that
Rover has led to a narrowing of the natural gas price differential
between the Dominion South hub of the Marcellus - Rover's entry
area -- and Henry Hub. The differential between other Marcellus
hubs and Henry Hub have not changed since export capacity from
those areas has not built out yet. Additionally, market data
indicate that natural gas volumes from the Marcellus into the
Lebanon Hub from established pipelines have declined significantly
since Rover began operations. These developments confirm Rover's
first mover advantage and currently help to mitigate the risk of
Rover losing a weak shipping counterparty.

Considerable pipeline expansion is occurring in the region and more
is expected as long as Marcellus and Utica producers can realize
higher netbacks from remote markets. The more competition, the more
challenge for Rover to extend contracts, which could influence its
ability to refinance debt at maturity on favorable terms. Recent
start-ups include Nexus and Atlantic Sunrise. However, Fitch
believes that it is increasingly difficult to establish large
long-haul pipelines in the region.

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

In its revised base case, Fitch assumes current levels of contract,
spot and backhaul volumes through term loan maturity in 2024,
reflecting actual performance along with expectations of favorable
market conditions over the near term. After the maturity date,
Fitch applies a 10% reduction to spot revenues and all revenues
associated with low speculative-grade shippers and spot and
backhaul revenue projections through the forecast period to late
2037. The reduction recognizes the potential for a shipper
bankruptcy and is approximately equivalent to the loss of all
merchant revenues, or the revenues associated with one of the
speculative-grade shippers other than Ascent Utica. In 2024, Fitch
assumes an effective extension of the term facility and the cash
sweep at an all-in average interest rate of 8%. DSCRs average 1.5x
during the tenor of the term loan facility and 2.9x
post-refinancing. At term loan refinance, leverage is 6.6x and the
PLCR based on revenue through late 2037 is about 1.2x at an 8%
discount rate. The PLCR would be about 1.3x at 6% or the
approximate current cost of debt. These PLCR calculations include
cash flow only to late 2037 based on model limitations, producing
conservative results.

Fitch's rating case further sensitizes the base case assumptions
through a 10% increase in O&M costs, a further 5% decline in the
low speculative-grade revenue haircut, and adds the new debt. DSCRs
average 1.4x during the tenor of the term loan and average 2.1x in
the post-refinancing period, reflecting the benefit of the flexible
repayment profile and the long-term value of Rover's contracts. At
term loan refinance, leverage is 7.5x and the PLCR based on revenue
through late 2037 is about 1.0x at the 8% discount rate and 1.1x at
a 6% discount rate

Recovery

Fitch's revised recovery analysis assumes a default scenario in
which a combination of lower capacity prices and marketed volumes
push Rover's revenues 30% below sponsor case levels. The debt
service reserve would be depleted such that default occurs at the
term loans' maturity in 2024. The 30% reduction in revenues
corresponds to approximately $95 million per year of distributable
cash flow to BCP. This reduced level of cash flow is assumed to
persist indefinitely and represents BCP's EBITDA as a going concern
in a distressed market environment.

Fitch applied a multiple of 8x against the 'going concern' EBITDA
to calculate an enterprise value of $760 million for BCP. The
multiple reflects Fitch's internal views and a comparison to
transaction multiples for similar companies. The Corporates group
has applied bespoke recovery analyses for midstream gas companies
only in isolated instances, as ratings within the sector only
rarely fall below the 'BB' category. An EBITDA multiple approach
for a going concern was applied in each case, and an EBITDA
multiple of 8x appears reasonable for Rover compared with the
limited pool of peers.

The enterprise value less 10% for administrative fees in bankruptcy
is divided by the $1.23 billion of term loans outstanding at
default to calculate a recovery rate of 56%, which falls within the
51%-70% band of recovery rates that correspond to the 'RR3'
Recovery Rating. This level of recovery is described as 'Good' on
the recovery ratings scale.

Criteria Variation

The analysis includes a variation from the "Rating Criteria for
Infrastructure and Project Finance", as this criteria excludes
recovery prospects given a default in instrument ratings provided
under this framework, which focus on the probability of default.
Nevertheless, in the context of the rating, a recovery rating has
been provided in line with the "Corporates Notching and Recovery
Ratings Criteria" published in March 2018.


BCP RENAISSANCE: Moody's Gives B1 Rating to $65MM Term Loan B
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B1 rating to BCP Renaissance
Parent L.L.C.'s proposed $65 million senior secured Term Loan B due
November 2024. BCP Renaissance's existing ratings including its B1
Corporate Family Rating, the B1 rating on its existing Term Loan B
and its B1-PD Probability of Default Rating are not affected by
this rating assignment. The outlook is stable.

The proposed $65 million Term Loan B is rated B1, equivalent to the
B1 Corporate Family Rating, as the Term Loan B is the only debt in
BCP Renaissance's capital structure.

Assignments:

Issuer: BCP Renaissance Parent L.L.C.

  Senior Secured Term Loan B, Assigned B1 (LGD4)

RATINGS RATIONALE

BCP Renaissance's B1 CFR reflects its non-operated 32.4% indirect
ownership interest in the Rover natural gas pipeline, a strategic
link which provides natural gas producers in the Utica and
Marcellus Basins with much needed expanded geographic access beyond
constrained local markets. Firm Transportation Service Agreements
aggregating 3.1 billion cubic feet per day of Rover's 3.25 Bcf per
day nameplate capacity is contracted on a "take-or-pay" basis with
eight natural gas producers. Effective September 1, 2018, FERC
in-service authorizations enabled Rover to begin earning on 100% of
its long haul contractual commitments, with final completion
achieved November 1. Moody's estimates that the weighted average
rating of the shipper portfolio has improved one notch to Ba2 since
BCP Renaissance's initial rating in September 2017, with the
remaining weighted average life of the contract portfolio
approximating 16-years.

Notwithstanding the strong asset quality and strategic value of a
fully completed and in-service Rover pipeline, BCP Renaissance
carries a heavy debt load, with debt/EBITDA initially exceeding 8x,
and Funds From Operations (FFO)/debt falling well below 10%.The
rating reflects the elevated leverage of BCP Renaissance's
investment in Rover, essentially a highly leveraged holding company
loan. Leverage is expected to decline from its initial high levels,
the function of a cash flow sweep of 100% of available cash to the
extent leverage exceeds 6x. Under the joint venture agreement
governing Rover, it is required to distribute all free cash flow to
the partners. Moreover, whereas Rover incurred completion delays
and substantial cost increases, the joint venture agreement
governing BCP Renaissance's investment in Rover insulates it from
these risks, insulation which continues to the extent of any
further construction-related costs on Rover. BCP Renaissance has no
obligation to fund beyond the $1.57 billion fixed dollar amount of
its October 2017 investment in Rover, and the funding of any
incremental costs incurred to complete the project will not dilute
its interest.

The outlook is stable reflecting the stable, fully contracted cash
flows generated on a take-or-pay basis by the fully in-service
Rover pipeline, and the continuing insulation of BCP Renaissance
from any further completion delays or cost increases. If
debt/EBITDA declines towards 5x with FFO/debt comfortably exceeding
10%, a rating upgrade could be considered. A downgrade could occur
should the credit quality of Rover's contracted shippers
deteriorates, or if debt/EBITDA and FFO/debt do not show steady
improvement.

Blackstone Energy Partners II L.P. and Blackstone Capital Partners
VII L.P. (collectively "Blackstone") established BCP Renaissance
Parent L.L.C. to acquire and hold a 49.9% interest in ET Rover
Pipeline LLC (ET Rover), the intermediate holding company that owns
a 65% interest in Rover Pipeline LLC, from Energy Transfer
Partners, L.P. (now Energy Transfer Operating, L.P. "ETO," Baa3
stable) in October 2017. ETO holds the remaining 50.1% interest in
ET Rover (32.6% net), and is the operator and construction manager
of the project. Traverse Midstream Partners LLC (B2 stable) holds
the remaining 35% non-operating interest in the Rover pipeline.


BIOSCRIP INC: Incurs $10.3 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
BioScrip, Inc., issued a press release reporting its first quarter
2019 financial results.

First Quarter 2019 Highlights

   * Net revenue of $179.0 million, up 6.2% compared to $168.6
     million in the first quarter of 2018.

   * Net revenue up 7.8% on a billing day rate basis; there was
     one less billing day in the first quarter of 2019 as
     compared to the first quarter of 2018.

   * Net loss from continuing operations of $10.3 million,
     compared to $13.0 million in the prior year quarter.
  
   * Adjusted EBITDA of $7.1 million, up 25.6% compared to $5.6
     million in the prior year quarter, despite $4.5 million of    

     increased bad debt expense in the current year quarter.

   * Net cash used in operating activities of $6.6 million,
     reflecting $7.0 million of operational cash flow and $13.6
     million of interest payments, including a bi-annual bond
     interest payment of $8.9 million.

   * Liquidity of $5.7 million at March 31, 2019, consisting of
     cash and cash equivalents.

Daniel E. Greenleaf, president and chief executive officer,
commented, "BioScrip delivered net revenue growth of 7.8% on a
billing day rate basis in the first quarter of 2019.  This is the
third consecutive quarter of comparable net revenue growth for
BioScrip, and we are confident this trend will continue.  Adjusted
EBITDA increased 25.6% year over year, to $7.1 million, despite
$4.5 million of higher bad debt expense in the quarter, and was in
line with our internal expectations.  We continue to make progress
in improving our cash collections and expect that bad debt expense
as a percent of sales will improve."

Mr. Greenleaf continued, "The merger transaction with Option Care
continues to proceed on plan, and we filed the preliminary merger
proxy statement earlier this week, highlighting the earnings power
of the pro forma combined company.  We remain incredibly
enthusiastic about the strategic and financial virtues of this
combination, which will create the nation's leading independent
national provider of home infusion services."

Financial Guidance and Conference Call

Given the pending combination with Option Care, the Company will
not be providing BioScrip financial guidance and will not be
hosting a quarterly conference call.  The Company and Option Care
intend to conduct investor and analyst meetings in the coming days.


                      About BioScrip, Inc.

Headquartered in Denver, Colo., BioScrip, Inc. --
http://www.bioscrip.com/-- is an independent national provider of
infusion and home care management solutions, with approximately
2,100 teammates and nearly 70 service locations across the U.S.
BioScrip partners with physicians, hospital systems, payors,
pharmaceutical manufacturers and skilled nursing facilities to
provide patients access to post-acute care services.  BioScrip
operates with a commitment to bring customer-focused pharmacy and
related healthcare infusion therapy services into the home or
alternate-site setting.

BioScrip reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$62.90 million in 2018, following a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $74.27 million in 2017.  As of March 31, 2019,
Bioscrip had $597.19 million in total assets, $657.28 million in
total liabilities, $3.33 million in series A convertible preferred
stock, $92.9 million in series C convertible preferred stock, and a
total stockholders' deficit of $156.34 million.

                            *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on Aug. 1, 2018, Moody's Investors Service
upgraded BioScrip Inc's Corporate Family Rating to 'Caa1' from
'Caa2'. BioScrip's Caa1 Corporate Family Rating reflects the
company's very high leverage and weak liquidity.  S&P Global
Ratings placed its ratings on BioScrip Inc., including the 'CCC+'
issuer credit rating, on CreditWatch with positive implications.
The CreditWatch positive placements for the ratings on Bioscrip
reflect the announcement that Bannockburn, Ill.-based HC Group
Holdings III Inc. plans to acquire Bioscrip in an all-stock
transaction., as reported by the TCR on March 22, 2019.


BLACKWOOD REDEVELOPMENT: Hires Nehmad Perrillo as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Blackwood Redevelopment Co. Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey to employ Nehmad
Perrillo Davis & Goldstein, PC, as counsel to the Debtor.

Blackwood Redevelopment requires Nehmad Perrillo to:

   -- assist in the preparation of the petition and ancillary
      reporting documents;

   -- consult with creditors concerning the administration of the
      bankruptcy case;

   -- form a Plan; and

   -- advise on the Debtor's rights, duties and obligations.

Nehmad Perrillo will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates.

Nehmad Perrillo will be paid a retainer of $25,000.  The Debtor has
an outstanding fee due of $1,717, of which the firm agrees to
waive.

Nehmad Perrillo will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Scott H. Marcus, a partner at Nehmad Perrillo, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Nehmad Perrillo can be reached at:

     Scott H. Marcus, Esq.
     NEHMAD PERRILLO DAVIS & GOLDSTEIN
     4030 Ocean Heights Avenue
     Egg Harbor Township, NJ 08234
     Tel: (609) 927-1177

                 About Blackwood Redevelopment

Blackwood Redevelopment Co. Inc., based in Blackwood, NJ, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-15937) on March 25,
2019.  In the petition signed by Daniel Riiff, president, the
Debtor disclosed $1,400,000 in assets and $4,342,768 in
liabilities.  Scott H. Marcus, Esq., at Nehmad Perrillo Davis &
Goldstein, PC, serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.




BLUE CAT CARRIERS: Seeks to Hire Seiller Waterman as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Blue Cat Carriers LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Kentucky to employ Seiller
Waterman LLC, as counsel to the Debtor.

Blue Cat Carriers requires Seiller Waterman to:

   a. give legal advice with respect to the Debtor's powers and
      duties as debtor in possession in the continued operations
      of its business and management of its assets;

   b. take all necessary action to protect and preserve Debtor's
      estate, including the prosecution of actions on behalf of
      the Debtor, the defense of any actions commenced against
      the Debtor, negotiations concerning all litigation in which
      the Debtor is involved, if any, and objecting to claims
      filed against the Debtor's estate;

   c. prepare on behalf of Debtor all necessary motions, answers,
      orders, reports and other legal papers in connection with
      the administration of the Debtor's estate herein; and

   d. perform any and all other legal services for Debtor in
      connection with this chapter 11 case and the formulation
      and implementation of the Debtor's chapter 11 plan.

Seiller Waterman will be paid based upon its normal and usual
hourly billing rates.

Seiller Waterman received from the Debtor a retainer in the sum of
$25,000.  Of this retainer, $5,355 has been utilized for
prepetition services and the chapter 11 filing fee, leaving a
balance of $19,645 in the Firm's trust account.

Seiller Waterman will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Neil C. Bordy, a partner at Seiller Waterman, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Seiller Waterman can be reached at:

     Neil C. Bordy, Esq.
     SEILLER WATERMAN LLC
     Meidinger Tower – 22nd Floor
     462 S. Fourth Street
     Louisville, KY 40202
     Tel: (502) 584-7400
     Fax: (502) 583-2100
     E-mail: cantor@derbycitylaw.com

                    About Blue Cat Carriers

Blue Cat Carriers LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 19-31199) on April 15, 2019, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is
represented by Neil C. Bordy, Esq. at Seiller Waterman LLC.



BOEAU BELLE: Seeks to Hire Jeff Wright as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------
Boeau Belle, Ltd., Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Texas to employ Jeff Wright
Consulting Services, LLC, as accountant to the Debtor.

Boeau Belle requires Jeff Wright to:

   (a) prepare Monthly Operating Reports;

   (b) provide general bookkeeping services;

   (c) prepare state and federal tax returns;

   (d) prepare plan projections;

   (e) perform other accounting tasks to assist in the Debtor's
       daily operations; and

   (f) provide testimony before the Court, if necessary.

Jeff Wright will be paid at the hourly rate of $225.

Jeff Wright will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Jeffrey A. Wright, partner of Jeff Wright Consulting Services, LLC,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Jeff Wright can be reached at:

     Jeffrey A. Wright
     JEFF WRIGHT CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC
     10935 Estate Lane, Suite 432
     Dallas, TX 75238
     Tel: (610) 213-8168

              About Boeau Belle, Ltd., Inc.

Founded in 2012, Boeau Belle Ltd. Boeau Belle Salon & Spa offers a
wide range of professional beauty services including hair cuts &
style, hair color, nails, waxing, threading, lash & brow
tinting/extensions, and make up application, as well as facials and
body polish services. http://www.boeaubelle.com/

Boeau Belle Ltd., Inc., based in Southlake, TX, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 19-40708) on March 18, 2019.
The Hon. Brenda T. Rhoades presides over the case. Christopher J.
Moser, Esq., at Quilling Selander Lownds Winslett & Moser, PC,
serves as bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in
both assets and liabilities. The petition was signed by Sid
Biranth, president.



BRAVEHEART REAL: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
---------------------------------------------------------
No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of Braveheart Real Estate, Inc. as of May 1,
according to a court docket.
    
                About Braveheart Real Estate Inc.

Braveheart Real Estate, Inc., a real estate lessor headquartered in
Stanaford, W.Va., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Case No. 19-50044) on March 22,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of between $1
million and $10 million.  The case has been assigned to Judge Frank
W. Volk.  Caldwell & Riffee is the Debtor's legal counsel.


BROOALEXA LLC: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-------------------------------------------------------
No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of BrooAlexa, LLC as of May 1, according to a
court docket.
    
                        About BrooAlexa LLC

BrooAlexa, LLC, a multi-faceted construction company in Charleston,
W.Va., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Case No. 19-20128) on March 27, 2019.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $25,352 in assets and
$1,557,712 in liabilities.  The case has been assigned to Judge
Frank W. Volk.  Pepper & Nason is the Debtor's legal counsel.


CALIFORNIA RESOURCES: Widens Net Loss to $67-Mil. in 1st Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------------
California Resources Corporation has filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting
a net loss attributable to common stock of $67 million on $690
million of total revenues and other for the three months ended
March 31, 2019, compared to a net loss attributable to common stock
of $2 million on $609 million of total revenues and other for the
same period in 2018.

Todd Stevens, CRC's president and chief executive officer, said,
"CRC began 2019 with a solid first quarter that highlighted our
value-driven, dynamic capital allocation.  We generated strong cash
flow, benefiting from the high quality, low risk and long life of
CRC's resource base, as well as our ability to quickly adapt
operating and capital plans to capture value across various price
environments.  To further accelerate value, we recently sold an
interest in our shallow production in the Lost Hills field, which
garnered more than $200 million consisting of $168 million in cash,
in addition to a 100% carry on a 200-well development program worth
at least $35 million.  The sale represents a 'win-win' that
provides cash to fund our ongoing balance sheet strengthening
efforts, while retaining a significant upside in the future
development by the new operator. We will continue to seek strategic
opportunities through the drill bit and through accretive
transactions using our diverse portfolio that unlock shareholder
value and strengthen our balance sheet."

As of March 31, 2019, California Resources had $7.23 billion in
total assets, $689 million in total current liabilities, $5.16
billion in long-term debt, $203 million in deferred gain and
issuance costs, $692 million in other long-term liabilities, $766
million in redeemable noncontrolling interests, and a total deficit
of $289 million.

As of March 31, 2019, the Company had approximately $256 million of
available borrowing under its $1 billion revolving credit facility
(2014 Revolving Credit Facility), before a $150 million month-end
minimum liquidity requirement.  Effective May 1, 2019, the
borrowing base under this facility was reaffirmed at $2.3 billion.
The Company's 2014 Revolving Credit Facility also includes a
sub-limit of $400 million for the issuance of letters of credit.
As of March 31, 2019 and Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had letters of
credit outstanding of approximately $168 million and $162 million,
respectively . These letters of credit were issued to support
ordinary course marketing, insurance, regulatory and other
matters.

First quarter of 2019 adjusted net income excluded $97 million of
non-cash derivative losses on commodity contracts, a $3 million
non-cash derivative loss from interest-rate contracts as well as a
net gain of $6 million on debt repurchases and $4 million of
unusual and infrequent items.

EBITDAX for the first quarter of 2019 was $301 million and cash
provided by operating activities was $158 million, which included
interest payments of $72 million.

Total daily production volumes increased 8% year-over-year, from
123,000 BOE per day for the first quarter of 2018 to 133,000 BOE
per day for the first quarter of 2019.  Total daily production for
2019 included volumes from the Elk Hills transaction, which was
completed in the second quarter of 2018.  Oil volumes averaged
84,000 barrels per day, NGL volumes averaged 15,000 barrels per day
and gas volumes averaged 202,000 thousand cubic feet (MCF) per
day.

Realized crude oil prices, including the effect of settled hedges,
increased by $2.51 per barrel from the first quarter of 2018 to
$65.28 per barrel in the first quarter of 2019 primarily due to
settled hedges that increased the Company's realized crude oil
prices by $1.98 per barrel.  Realized NGL prices were $42.52 per
barrel.  Realized natural gas prices were $3.43 per MCF for the
first quarter of 2019, $0.62 higher than the same prior-year period
primarily due to higher winter demand.

Production costs for the first quarter of 2019 were $233 million
compared to $212 million for the first quarter of 2018.  The
increase is attributable to the Elk Hills transaction, cash-settled
stock-based compensation, energy costs and other items.

General and administrative expenses were $83 million for the first
quarter of 2019 compared to $63 million for the same prior-year
period.  CRC's cash-settled stock-based compensation expense
increased approximately $7 million due to the increase in the
Company's stock price in the first quarter of 2019.

Additionally, 2019 G&A expenses increased by approximately $3
million as certain costs are no longer collected from CRC's former
working interest partner following the Elk Hills transaction.

CRC reported taxes other than on income of $41 million for the
first quarter of 2019 compared to $38 million for the same prior
year period.  Exploration expense was $10 million for the first
quarter of 2019, $2 million higher in the first quarter of 2019
than the same prior-year period due to an increased exploration
budget.

CRC's internally funded capital investment for the first quarter of
2019 totaled $104 million, of which $93 million was directed to
drilling and capital workovers.  CRC's JV partner Benefit Street
Partners (BSP) also invested $27 million, which is included in
CRC's consolidated results.  CRC's JV partner Macquarie
Infrastructure and Real Assets Inc. (MIRA) invested an additional
$7 million, which is excluded from CRC's consolidated results.

Operational Update

In the first quarter of 2019, CRC operated an average of 7 drilling
rigs with 2 rigs focused on conventional primary production, 2 on
waterfloods, 1 on steamfloods and 2 on unconventional production.
With total invested capital, the Company drilled 52 development
wells and 8 exploration wells (40 steamflood, 9 waterflood, 5
primary and 6 unconventional). Steamfloods and waterfloods have
different production profiles and longer response times than
typical conventional wells and, as a result, the full production
contribution may not be experienced in the same period that the
well is drilled.  The San Joaquin basin produced approximately
97,000 BOE per day and operated six rigs.

The Los Angeles basin contributed 25,000 BOE per day of production
and operated one rig directed toward waterflood projects.  The
Ventura and Sacramento basins, where the Company had no active
drilling program, produced 6,000 BOE per day and 5,000 BOE per day,
respectively.

2019 Capital Budget

CRC's internally funded investments will be largely directed to
short payout projects, such as primary drilling and capital
workovers, and low-risk projects including waterflood and
steamflood investments that maintain base production.  CRC
estimates its 2019 internally funded capital program will range
from $300 million to $385 million, which may be adjusted during the
course of the year depending on commodity prices.  CRC obtained an
additional $50 million investment from BSP during the first quarter
of 2019 and continues discussions to obtain additional investments
from new and existing JVs to achieve a total capital budget of
approximately $500 million.

Strategic Asset Divestiture

On May 1, 2019 CRC sold 50% of its working interest and transferred
operatorship in certain zones in the Company's Lost Hills field in
the San Joaquin Basin for total consideration in excess of $200
million, consisting of approximately $168 million in cash and a
carried 200 well development program to be drilled through 2023
with an estimated minimum value of $35 million.  The cash proceeds
were used to pay down the revolver and CRC benefits from
accelerated development from the drilling carry.

Balance Sheet and Credit Facility Update

Effective May 1, 2019, CRC's borrowing base under its 2014 Credit
Agreement was reaffirmed at $2.3 billion.  Following the closing of
the Lost Hills transaction, pro forma total debt outstanding was
$5.1 billion, down $168 million from March 31, 2019, bringing total
availability on the Company's revolver to over $420 million before
the minimum liquidity requirement.

During the first quarter of 2019, CRC repurchased $18 million in
aggregate principal amount of CRC's Second Lien Notes for $14
million.

Hedging Update

CRC continues to implement an opportunistic hedging program to
protect its cash flow, operating margins and capital program, while
maintaining adequate liquidity.  For the second quarter of 2019,
CRC has protected its downside price risk on approximately 40,000
barrels per day at approximately $70 Brent.  For the third and
fourth quarters of 2019, CRC has protected the downside price risk
on approximately 40,000 and 35,000 barrels per day at approximately
$73 Brent and $76 Brent, respectively.  The underlying instruments
in the Company's 2019 hedge program are puts and put spreads that
provide full upside to oil price movements.  For the first and
second quarters of 2020, CRC has protected the downside risk of
approximately 25,000 and 15,000 barrels per day at approximately
$72 Brent and $70 Brent, respectively. CRC's 2019 and 2020 put
spreads provide downside price protection until Brent prices drop
to between $55 and $60 per barrel, at which point the Company
receives Brent plus approximately $15 per barrel.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/0uxkf1

                 About California Resources

California Resources Corporation -- http://www.crc.com/-- is an
oil and natural gas exploration and production company
headquartered in Los Angeles, California.  The Company operates its
resource base exclusively within the State of California, applying
complementary and integrated infrastructure to gather, process and
market its production.  Using advanced technology, California
Resources Corporation focuses on safely and responsibly supplying
affordable energy for California by Californians.

California Resources reported net income attributable to common
stock of $328 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to
a net loss attributable to common stock of $266 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had
$7.15 billion in total assets, $607 million in total current
liabilities, $5.25 billion in long-term debt, $216 million in
deferred gain and issuance costs, $575 million in other long-term
liabilities, $756 million in redeemable non-controlling interests,
and a total deficit of $247 million.

                          *     *     *

In March 2019, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'CCC+' issuer credit
rating on California Resources Corp.  The affirmation reflects
S&P's expectation that CRC will continue to support its liquidity
by balancing its spending with its cash flow, selling non-core
assets, and potential for joint ventures in 2019 as mentioned in
the company's fourth quarter conference call.

In November 2017, Moody's Investors Service upgraded California
Resources' Corporate Family Rating (CFR) to 'Caa1' from 'Caa2' and
Probability of Default Rating (PDR) to 'Caa1-PD' from 'Caa2-PD'.
Moody's said the upgrade of CRC's CFR  to 'Caa1' reflects CRC's
improved liquidity and the likelihood that it will have sufficient
liquidity to support its operations for at least the next two years
at current commodity prices.


CANBRIAM ENERGY: Moody's Cuts CFR to Ca & $350MM Unsec. Notes to C
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Canbriam Energy Inc.'s
Corporate Family Rating to Ca from Caa3, Probability of Default
Rating to C-PD/LD from Caa3-PD and US$350 million senior unsecured
notes rating to C from Ca. The outlook remains negative.

The downgrade of the CFR and the downgrade of the PDR with the /LD
designation indicating a limited default reflects the maturity of
the revolver due April 30, 2019 without a long-term resolution for
extension or refinancing in place. Canbriam has entered into a
forbearance agreement and Moody's expects a subsequent debt
restructuring.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Canbriam Energy Inc.

  Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to C-PD /LD
  from Caa3-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to Ca from Caa3

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to C
  (LGD5) from Ca (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Canbriam Energy Inc.

  Outlook, Remains Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

Canbriam (Ca CFR) is challenged by: 1) the failure to pay the
revolver due April 2019 and inability to pay the senior notes due
November 2019; 2) high exposure to weak western Canadian natural
gas prices and minimal hedges in 2019 keeping margins weak; 3) a
weak leveraged full-cycle ratio (LFCR) well under 1x in 2019; and
4) geographic concentration in the Montney formation in northeast
British Columbia. The company is supported by: 1) a sizeable
reserves and expected production of 38,000 boe/d (barrel of oil
equivalent per day) in 2019; and 2) low sustaining capital spending
which will support near breakeven free cash flow in 2019.

In accordance with Moody's Loss Given Default (LGD) Methodology,
the US$350 million senior unsecured notes are rated C, one notch
below the Ca CFR, due to the priority ranking of the debt
outstanding under the secured borrowing base revolving credit
facility.

The negative outlook reflects the high probability of a debt
restructuring or bankruptcy filing in the near term.

The ratings could be upgraded if the senior notes are refinanced
and the revolver is extended such that liquidity would be at least
adequate.

The CFR could be downgraded if the company pursues a formal
restructuring.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Independent
Exploration and Production Industry published in May 2017.

Canbriam Energy Inc. is a private Calgary, Alberta-based
independent exploration and production company focused in the
Montney formation in northeastern British Columbia with (net of
royalties) production at about 34,500 boe/d in 2018 (83% natural
gas).


CAPSTONE PEDIATRICS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-------------------------------------------------------------
No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of Capstone Pediatrics, PLLC as of May 1,
according to a court docket.
    
                   About Capstone Pediatrics PLLC

Capstone Pediatrics, PLLC -- http://www.capstonepediatrics.com--
operates a pediatric and adolescent center focused on delivering
personalized care designed to improve and maintain its patients'
health and well being.  It is owned by Dr. Gary Griffieth, who
operates the company as chief executive officer.  

Capstone Pediatrics sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 19-01971) on March 28,
2019.  It previously sought bankruptcy protection on Dec. 18, 2015
(Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 15-09031).  At the time of the filing,
the Debtor had estimated assets of between $1 million and $10
million and liabilities of between $10 million and $50 million.  

The case has been assigned to Judge Randal S. Mashburn.  Burr &
Forman LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.


CBCS WASHINGTON: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee
------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 on May 1 appointed three creditors to
serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Chapter 11 case of CBCS Washington Street LP.

The committee members are:

     (1) Stephen B. Jacobs Group P.C.
         381 Park Avenue South
         New York, New York 10016  
         Attention: Stephen B. Jacobs, President   
         Telephone: (212) 421-3712

     (2) Cumming Construction Management Inc.
         d/b/a Lehrer Cumming
         888 7th Avenue, 2nd Floor
         New York, New York 10019    
         Attention: Peter M. Lehrer, CEO   
         Telephone: (212) 459-1818

     (3) 445 Washington, LLC   
         60 Vestry Street   
         New York, New York 10013    
         Attention: Vincent J. Ponte, President   
         Telephone: (212) 274-1555

Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                   About CBCS Washington Street

CBCS Washington Street LP is a partnership and a lessee under an
Agreement of Lease dated June 19, 2013 with 445 Washington LLC for
the parcels of real property located in New York. The Debtor is
currently developing the premises into a 96-room luxury hotel under
the "Hotel Barriere Le Fouquet" brand.

Based in White Plains, N.Y., CBCS Washington Street filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-22607) on March 12, 2019.
In its petition, the Debtor disclosed $40,500,496 in assets and
$17,201,731 in liabilities. The petition was signed by Ivaylo V.
Ninov, authorized representative of Washington Street Hotel GP LLC,
GP.  

The Hon. Robert D. Drain oversees the case.  Fred B. Ringel, Esq.,
at Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck P.C., is the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


CDK GLOBAL: Moody's Rates New Sr. Unsecured Notes Due 2029 'Ba1'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba1 rating to CDK Global,
Inc.'s new senior unsecured notes due 2029. CDK intends to use the
proceeds to repay debt outstanding under its $750 million senior
unsecured revolving credit facility due 2023 and for general
corporate purposes.

Assignments:

Issuer: CDK Global, Inc.

  Senior Unsecured Notes, Assigned Ba1 (LGD4)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The announced offering will improve liquidity and is credit
positive, Moody's expects most of the proceeds to be used for debt
reduction. CDK will increase availability under its $750 million
revolver, which had approximately $490 million drawn as of March
31, 2018. The transaction is expected to be leverage neutral and
Moody's expects debt to EBITDA (Moody's adjusted) to decline
towards 3.0x over the next 12-18 months through EBITDA growth.
Leverage is currently at the top of management's 2.5-3.0x stated
range (per management's definition) as a result of elevated
debt-funded share repurchases in recent quarters and the ELEAD1ONE
acquisition in 2018. Moody's expects lower buybacks as management
seeks to return to historical leverage levels. The transaction does
not impact the company's Ba1 Corporate Family Rating, Ba1 (LGD4)
senior unsecured rating or SGL-1 Speculative Grade Liquidity
rating. The outlook for CDK remains stable.

The principal methodology used in this rating was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

CDK Global Inc., headquartered in Hoffman Estates, IL, is a global
provider of technology and digital marketing solutions to the
automotive retail and adjacent industries. The company also
provided automotive commerce solutions to dealers in over 100
countries, serving roughly 28,000 retail locations and most
automotive manufacturers. CDK generated revenues of $2.3 billion
for the 12 months ended March 31, 2019.


CENGAGE LEARNING: S&P Puts B- ICR on Watch Pos. on McGraw-Hill Deal
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all of its ratings on U.S.-based
educational material and learning solutions provider Cengage
Learning Holdings II Inc. (Cengage), including its 'B-' issuer
credit rating, on CreditWatch with positive implications.

The CreditWatch positive placement follows Cengage's announcement
that it will merge with McGraw-Hill Education Inc. (MHE) in an
all-stock transaction. The new company is expected to be called
McGraw Hill and will benefit from increased scale and potentially
significantly improved cash flow generation and should be able to
deleverage through cost savings, though the execution risks are
high given the size of the two companies and the potential for
operational disruptions. The companies expect to realize around
$300 million of operating synergies through rationalization of
sales force and other corporate functions. S&P doesn't expect to
see any significant improvement in McGraw Hill's credit metrics in
the first year after the transaction close, because the synergies
will be offset by cash severance and restructuring charges.

As part of the proposed merger, the companies will seek to extend
the maturities of their combined $3.4 billion of existing senior
secured term loans to May 2024. MHE and Cengage's existing senior
secured term loans mature in 2022 and 2023, respectively. Cengage's
senior unsecured notes will remain outstanding after the merger and
S&P anticipates that the combined entity will guarantee the debt.

McGraw Hill will be highly leveraged with roughly $4.5 billion of
debt. On a combined basis, adjusted debt to EBITDA was 9x and
adjusted free operating cash flow (FOCF) to debt was 4% as of March
31, 2019. This compares with Cengage's stand-alone leverage of over
11x. S&P expects McGraw Hill's adjusted leverage and FOCF to debt
to improve to 7x and 5%, respectively, in fiscal year 2020.

"We expect to resolve the CreditWatch following the completion of
the merger in early 2020. We will monitor all developments related
to the merger, including when the companies receive the necessary
regulatory clearances and lender support to refinance or extend
their existing senior secured term loans, their operating
performance, and industry conditions," S&P said. The rating agency
said it expects the transaction will be positive for Cengage given
its higher rating on MHE and the combined company's larger scale,
adding that it also anticipates the combination will provide
potential cost-saving synergies.

"If the transaction is completed as expected, we would likely raise
our issuer credit rating on Cengage to 'B' to equalize it with our
rating on MHE," S&P said.


CHARLES RIVER: S&P Lowers ICR to 'BB+' on Citoxlab Acquisition
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term issuer credit rating on
Wilmington, Mass.-based contract research organization (CRO)
Charles River Laboratories International Inc. (CRL) to 'BB+' from
'BBB-' and lowered all issue-level ratings by one notch. S&P
removed the ratings from CreditWatch, where it had placed them with
negative implications on Feb. 14, 2019.

CRL acquired privately held Europe-focused discovery and safety
assessment company CRO Citoxlab for roughly $500 million. The
acquisition is consistent with CRL's strategy of enhancing its
leading position in the fragmented but growing market for
outsourced pharmaceutical nonclinical and manufacturing support
services, while maintaining its position as the leader in the
related research models and services business.

"The stable outlook reflects our belief that leverage will
generally remain in upper end of the 2.5-3.0x range, occasionally
spiking above 3x following an acquisition. We think CRL has the
capacity to quickly deleverage following an acquisition, given its
strong expected free cash flow and the company's financial policy
to keep leverage generally below 3x," S&P said.


CHRISTIAN RADABAUGH, SR: Proposed Sale of GP Cattle Approved
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Peter C. McKittrick of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Oregon authorized Christian S. Radabaugh, Sr.'s sale of
the cattle that is subject to a lien in favor of GP, LLC outside
the ordinary course of business, on the terms and conditions set
forth in the Motion.

In the Motion, the Debtor intends to sell his GP Cattle at private,
arms'-length, market price sales beginning on April 26, 2019.  If
he's unable to sell all of his GP Cattle by May 30, 2019, the
Debtor intends to sell his remaining GP Cattle at auction on May
30, 2019, through Shasta Livestock Auction Yard / Western Video
Market.

The proceeds from the sales will be applied only to GP's interest
and principal.  GP's attorney fees and costs will not be paid from
the sales proceeds without further order of the Court.

Christian S. Radabaugh, Sr. sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.
Ore. Case No. 18-34244) on Dec. 7, 2018.  The Debtor tapped
Nicholas J. Henderson, Esq., at Motschenbacher & Blattner LLP, as
counsel.


COMMUNITY HEALTH: Reports First Quarter 2019 Financial Results
--------------------------------------------------------------
Community Health Systems. Inc. has filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting
a net loss attributable to the Company's stockholders of $118
million on $3.37 billion of net operating revenues for the three
months ended March 31, 2019, compared to a net loss attributable to
the Company's stockholders of $25 million on $3.68 billion of net
operating revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2018.

As of March 31, 2019, Community Health had $16.30 billion in total
assets, $17.39 billion in total liabilities, $505 million in
redeemable noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated
subsidiaries, and a total stockholders' deficit of $1.59 billion.

                 Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $27 million,
from approximately $106 million for the three months ended March
31, 2018, to approximately $133 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2019.  The increase in cash provided by operating
activities was primarily the result of lower interest payments due
to the timing of payments resulting from the refinancing activity
during the three months ended March 31, 2019, as well as from an
increase in cash flow from patient accounts receivable collections.
Such increases were offset by higher malpractice claim payments
compared to the same period in 2018.  Total cash paid for interest
during the three months ended March 31, 2019 decreased to
approximately $189 million compared to $212 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2018.  Cash paid for income taxes, net of
refunds received, resulted in a net refund of less than $1 million
during both of the three-month periods ended March 31, 2019 and
2018.

The Company's net cash provided by investing activities was
approximately $19 million for the three months ended March 31,
2019, compared to net cash used in investing activities of
approximately $177 million for the three months ended March 31,
2018, an increase of approximately $196 million.  The cash provided
by investing activities during the three months ended March 31,
2019, was primarily impacted by an increase in proceeds from the
divestitures of hospitals and other ancillary operations of $150
million in the first three months of 2019 compared to the same
period in 2018, an increase in cash provided by the net impact of
the purchases and sales of available-for-sale securities and equity
securities of $2 million, a decrease of $4 million in the cash used
in the acquisition of facilities and other related equipment (for
physician practices, clinics and other ancillary businesses, as
there were no hospital acquisitions during either the three months
ended March 31, 2019 or 2018) and a decrease in the cash used in
the purchase of property and equipment of $49 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018.
These increases in cash inflow were partially offset by an increase
in cash used for other investments (primarily from internal-use
software expenditures and physician recruiting costs) of $6 million
and a decrease in cash provided by the sale of property and
equipment of $3 million.

The Company's net cash used in financing activities was $71 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2019, compared to
approximately $68 million for the three months ended March 31,
2018, an increase of approximately $3 million.  The increase in
cash used in financing activities, in comparison to the prior year
period, was primarily due to the net effect of our debt repayment,
refinancing activity, and cash paid for deferred financing costs
and other debt-related costs.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/Do7EVu

                    About Community Health

Community Health -- http://www.chs.net/-- is a publicly traded
hospital company and an operator of general acute care hospitals in
communities across the country.  The Company, through its
subsidiaries, owns, leases or operates 106 affiliated hospitals in
18 states with an aggregate of approximately 17,000 licensed beds.
The Company's headquarters are located in Franklin, Tennessee, a
suburb south of Nashville.  Shares in Community Health Systems,
Inc. are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
"CYH."

Community Health reported a net loss attributable to the Company's
stockholders of $788 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss attributable to the Company's
stockholders of $2.45 billion for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, Community Health had $15.85
billion in total assets, $16.81 billion in total liabilities, $504
million in redeemable non-controlling interests in equity of
consolidated subsidiaries, and a total stockholders' deficit of
$1.46 billion.

                           *    *     *

As reported by the TCR on July 2, 2018, S&P Global Ratings raised
its corporate credit rating on Franklin, Tenn.-based hospital
operator Community Health Systems Inc. to 'CCC+' from 'SD'
(selective default).  The outlook is negative.  "The upgrade of
Community to 'CCC+' reflects the company's longer-dated debt
maturity schedule, and our view that its efforts to rationalize its
hospital portfolio as well as improve financial performance and
cash flow should strengthen credit measures over the next 12 to 18
months."

In May 2018, Fitch Ratings downgraded Community Health Systems'
(CHS) Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'C' from 'CCC' following the
company's announcement of an offer to exchange three series of
senior unsecured notes due 2019, 2020 and 2022.


CONSOLIDATED INFRASTRUCTURE: Sets Bidding Procedures for All Assets
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Consolidated Infrastructure Group, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to authorize the bidding
procedures in connection with the sale of substantially all assets
at auction.

By order of the Court, the Debtor has retained the firm
Gavin/Solmonese, LLC to conduct a robust marketing process in order
to reach as many potential purchasers as possible and to elicit the
best and highest offer possible for its Assets.  Since its
engagement, Gavin/Solmonese has begun and continues to diligently
and aggressively market the Debtor's Assets through a comprehensive
sale and marketing process.  To date, Gavin/Solmonese has
identified approximately 75 potential purchasers, of which three
have executed non-disclosure agreements.   The Debtor expects these
marketing efforts to culminate in a sale process that will maximize
the value of its Assets for the benefit of all stakeholders.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline:  May 9, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

     b. Initial Bid: The purchase price offered for the Assets is
expressed in U.S. Dollars.

     c. Deposit: 10% of the Purchase Price

     d. Auction: If it receives two or more Qualified Bids, the
Debtor will conduct the Auction of the Assets, which will take
place May 13, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (ET) at the offices of Debtor’s
counsel, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., One Rodney Square, 920
North King Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.

     e. Bid Increments: $100,000

     f. Sale Hearing: May 23, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (ET)

     g. Closing: May 30, 2019  

The Debtor proposes these other key dates and deadlines for the
Sale and Auction process, which may be subject to extension in
accordance with the Bid Procedures.

     a. May 2, 2019 - Deadline for the Debtor to designate Stalking
Horse

     b. May 8, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. (ET) -  Cure Objection Deadline

     c. May 10, 2019 - Deadline for the Debtor to notify Potential
Bidders of their status as Qualified Bidders

     d. May 14, 2019 - Target date for the Debtor to file with the
Court the Notice of Auction Results

     e. May 17, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. (ET) - Sale Objection Deadline

     f. May 17, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. (ET) - Adequate Assurance
Objection Deadline

Within one day after entry of the Bid Procedures Order, or as
reasonably practicable thereafter, the Debtor will file with the
Court the Sale Notice upon all Sale Notice Parties.

In connection with the Sale, the Debtor may seek to assume and
assign to the Successful Bidder any of the Debtor’s Contracts.
Within one day after entry of the Bid Procedures Order, or as
reasonably practicable thereafter, the Debtor will file with the
Court and serve the Assumption and Assignment Notice, on each
applicable Counterparty listed thereon.

By the Motion, the Debtor asks (a) entry of the Bid Procedures
Order (i) approving the Bid Procedures, (ii) authorizing, but not
directing, the Debtor to enter into a Stalking Horse APA with a
Stalking Horse, subject to Court approval of any Bid Protections;
(iii) approving the Assumption and Assignment Procedures, (iv)
approving the form and manner of the Sale Notice, and (v)
scheduling an Auction and Sale Hearing, and (b) entry of an order
(i) authorizing the sale of the Assets free and clear of all liens,
claims, interests and encumbrances, (ii) authorizing the assumption
and assignment of Contracts as set forth in any Purchase Agreement,
and (iii) granting related relief.

The Debtor believes it is in the best interests of the Estate, its
creditors, and other parties in interest to commence a process for
soliciting potential bidders and to complete the Sale of the
Debtor’s Assets.  The Bid Procedures were developed to further
the Debtor’s dual needs to expedite the sale process and to
foster competitive bidding among financially capable bidders who
demonstrate the ability to close a transaction.

A copy of the Bidding Procedures attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

    
http://bankrupt.com/misc/Consolidated_Infrastructure_135_Sales.pdf

A hearing on the Motion is set for April 29, 2019 at 11:00 a.m.
(ET).  The objection deadline is April 19, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

                About Consolidated Infrastructure

Created in 2016 and headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska, Consolidated
Infrastructure Group, Inc., provides underground utility and damage
prevention services to support others that do underground
construction and maintenance.  By providing detailed information on
what lies beneath the surface, CIG's damage prevention services
help protect communities from damage that could otherwise occur
when utilities, other companies, or individuals dig underground.

CIG sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 19-10165)
on Jan. 30, 2019.  The Hon. Brendan Linehan Shannon is the case
judge.

The Debtor disclosed $11.6 million in assets and $9 million in
liabilities as of Jan. 30, 2019.

Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., is the Debtor's counsel.
Gavin/Solmonese LLC is the financial advisor and investment banker.
Omni Management Group is the claims and noticing agent.


CORP.REALTY USA: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Corp.Realty USA, LLC
           aka Crp.Realty USA, LLC
        10936 Pacific View Dr.
        Malibu, CA 90265

Business Description: Corp.Realty USA, LLC is a privately held
                      company engaged in activities related to
                      real estate.  The Company owns a property
                      in Malibu, California with a current value
                      of $7.80 million (based on expert
                      valuation).  The Company previously sought
                      bankruptcy protection on May 10, 2018
                      (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-10741).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Santa Barbara)

Case No.: 19-10822

Judge: Hon. Deborah J. Saltzman

Debtor's Counsel: Mark J. Markus, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF MARK J. MARKUS
                  11684 Ventura Blvd Ste 403
                  Studio City, CA 91604-2652
                  Tel: 818-509-1173
                  E-mail: bklawr@bklaw.com

Total Assets: $7,814,000

Total Liabilities: $6,000,356

The petition was signed by Edgard Augusto Meinhardt Iturbe,
managing member.

The Debtor lists Gensi, LLC as its sole unsecured creditor holding
a claim of $717,907.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb19-10822.pdf


COVIA HOLDINGS: Moody's Cuts CFR to B1 & Alters Outlook to Negative
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Covia Holdings Corporation's
Corporate Family Rating to B1 from Ba3, the Probability of Default
Rating to B1-PD from Ba3-PD, and senior secured credit facility to
B1 from Ba3. The Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating is affirmed at
SGL-3. The rating outlook was revised to negative from rating under
review. This concludes the review initiated on February 28, 2019.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Covia Holdings Corporation
                                                         
  Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to B1-PD from Ba3-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to B1 from Ba3

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Downgraded to B1 (LGD3)
  from Ba3 (LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Covia Holdings Corporation

  Outlook, Changed To Negative From Rating Under Review

Affirmations:

Issuer: Covia Holdings Corporation

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Affirmed SGL-3

RATINGS RATIONALE

Covia's B1 CFR and negative outlook reflect Moody's expectation
that EBITDA, operating profits and key credit metrics will
significantly deteriorate during 2019, stemming from on-going
volatility in the oil and natural gas industry and persistent
weakness in the frac sand industry. It also takes into
consideration the company's reliance on cash on hand to supplement
its cash flows. Since mid-2018, prices for frac sand have declined
by more than 20% due to overcapacity and the displacement of
Northern White Sand by cheaper in-basin sand. Despite, recent
improvement in the price of oil, mine closures, and production
cuts, Moody's does not expect any significant price recovery as
many miners have committed to higher volumes at lower prices. For
2019, Moody's expects the company's revenues and operating profits
to decline by 3% and 76%, respectively, total debt-to-EBITDA to
increase to 6.7x from 5.1x, adjusted debt-to-book capitalization to
increase to 57% from 55%, and EBIT-to-Interest expense to decline
to 0.2x from 1.6x (inclusive of Moody's adjustments).

The company's B1 CFR reflects the company's exposure and reliance
on the hydraulic fracturing industry for the majority of its
revenue, the earnings volatility associated with the energy end
markets and Moody's expectation that in 2019, key credit metrics
will weaken materially due to overcapacity and lower demand
impacting the pricing dynamics for frac-sand.

The B1 rating is supported by its (i) strong leading market
position as a supplier of sand-based proppants for the oil and
natural gas industry in North America and as a supplier of
multimineral product offerings to industrial customers primarily in
the United States and Mexico; (ii) its extensive proven and
probable reserves, with over 50 processing and coating facilities,
a broad, developed logistical network, and long-standing customer
relationships; and (iii) the stability of earnings generated from
the company's industrial segment, which represents 40% to 50% of
sales volume, diversifying its earnings stream away from the
cyclical energy markets.

The Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating (SGL-3) reflects the
company's adaquate liquidity profile resulting from its cash on
hand and ability to fund its operations from internal sources,
service its debt and deploy growth capital. This is supported by
$134.1 million of cash on hand (as of December 31, 2018) and lack
of near-term debt maturities, as its $200 million revolver expires
in 2023 and its $1.65 billion term loan matures in 2025. The
principal financial covenant under the existing revolving credit
facility and the $1.65 billion term loan facility is a maximum
leverage ratio covenant test of 6.6x until December 31, 2019. This
leverage test steps down to 5.5x for the full year 2020, and
gradually declines to 4.0x by March 31, 2022. The rating assumes
that the company will not utilize the revolver to meet internal
uses of cash but rather use cash on hand.

Moody's indicated that the ratings could be stabilized if adjusted
debt-to-book capitalization is maintained under 60%, adjusted
EBIT-to-Interest is sustained above 2.0x, and adjusted operating
margin is above 20%. A stable outlook would also require robust
liquidity, free cash flow generation, and healthy oil and natural
gas end markets.

The ratings could be downgraded if liquidity deteriorates in part
by lack of free cash generation, revolver availability and/or
weakened financial flexibility, possibly due to aggressive growth,
large debt-funded acquisitions or shareholder friendly activities
such as share repurchases. In addition, ratings could be pressured
if adjusted debt-to-book capitalization stays above 60%, if
adjusted EBIT-to-Interest remains below 1.0x, and adjusted
operating margin is sustained below 10% for an extended period of
time.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Building
Materials Industry published in January 2017.

Based in Independence, Ohio, Covia [NYSE: CVIA] is a leading
provider of specialty sands and minerals serving the energy and
industrial end markets. The company has approximately 50 million
tons of annual processing capacity. In June 2018, Unimin
Corporation and Fairmount Santrol, Inc. combined in a cash and
stock transaction to create Covia, with Sibelco as the largest
shareholder with approximately 65% of the shares. Sibelco is
SCR-Sibelco NV, a private, globally-diversified, industrial
minerals company based in Belgium. For the 12 months ending
December 31, 2019, Moody's projects Covia will generate
approximately $1.8 billion in revenues and $35 million in operating
profits (inclusive of Moody's standard adjustments).


CREDIAUTOUSA FINANCIAL: Taps Brandon Smith Law as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CrediautoUSA Financial Company LLC seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California to retain
the Law Offices of Brandon Smith as its special litigation
counsel.

The firm will continue to represent the Debtor in the following
cases, which are still pending in the San Diego Superior Court:

     (a) CrediautoUSA Financial Company LLC v. Meena's Corporation
et al., Case No. 37-2019-00009253-CU-BC-CTL.

     (b) CrediautoUSA Financial Company LLC v. Grow Auto Financial
et al., Case No. 37-2019-00011532-CU-BC-CTL.

     (c) Alcocer v. CrediautoUSA Financial Company LLC, Case No.
37-2019-00004549-CU-BC-CTL.

The firm will charge $350 per hour for its services.

Brandon Smith, principal of the Law Offices of Brandon Smith,
attests that he and other employees of the firm neither hold nor
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor's estate.

The firm can be reached at:

     Brandon M. Smith, Esq.
     Law Offices of Brandon M. Smith, APC
     105 W. "F" Street 3rd Floor,
     San Diego, CA 92101
     Phone: (619) 236-8344
     Email: brandonsmith@brandonsmithlaw.com

                About CrediautoUSA Financial Company
                         and AI CAUSA LLC

Founded in 2012 and headquartered in San Diego, CrediautoUSA
Financial Company LLC -- http://www.crediautofinancial.com-- has
established programs to finance vehicles sold by licensed
automobile dealerships to individuals with no credit history or
with less than perfect credit.

CrediautoUSA Financial Company LLC and its affiliate AI CAUSA LLC
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
S.D. Calif. Case Nos. 19-01870 and 19-01864) on March 30, 2019.  At
the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets of between
$1 million and $10 million and liabilities of between $1 million
and $10 million.  

The cases have been assigned to Judge Louise Decarl Adler.
CrediautoUSA is represented by the Law Offices of Kit J. Gardner
while AI CAUSA LLC is represented by Higgs Fletcher & Mack LLP.


CUMBERLAND FARMS: Moody's Hikes CFR to Ba3 & Unsec. Rating to B1
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded Cumberland Farms, Inc.'s
Corporate Family Rating to Ba3 from B1, its Probability of Default
Rating to Ba3-PD from B1-PD and its senior unsecured rating to B1
from B3. The outlook is stable.

"The upgrade reflects Moody's expectation that Cumberland Farms
will maintain leverage below 4.5x (including Moody's standard
adjustments) as the company benefits from new store growth and
improved earnings at its "AIM" format stores," stated Pete
Trombetta, Moody's convenience store/fuel retailer analyst. " These
new stores represent about 70% of the company's store base and
feature fresh food offerings, improved store formats and increased
private label sales", added Trombetta.

Upgrades:

Issuer: Cumberland Farms, Inc.

  Probability of Default Rating, Upgraded to Ba3-PD
  from B1-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Upgraded to Ba3 from B1

  Senior Unsecured Notes, Upgraded to B1 (LGD5) from
  B3 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Cumberland Farms, Inc.

  Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Cumberland Farms' credit profile benefits from its modest leverage
with Moody's adjusted debt/EBITDA of 2.4x for the LTM period ended
December 31, 2018. Cumberland Farms' credit profile is also
supported by its favorable comparison to higher rated industry
peers in terms of (1) a lower reliance on volatile fuel prices as a
percentage of total revenue and gross profit, (2) merchandise gross
profit margins and (3) fuel margins on a cents per gallon basis.
The ratings also consider the company's success with the transition
to its new store design ("AIM format"), which accounts for about
70% of the company's stores, that has driven improved merchandise
margins, a better merchandise mix with strong performance from its
prepared and fresh foods, and increased customer loyalty.

Cumberland Farms is constrained by its small scale in terms of
absolute level of earnings and number of stores relative to
industry peers and its geographic concentration -- about 90% of its
stores are in the northeast US. While this market has proven to be
successful for Cumberland Farms, this level of geographic
concentration exposes the company to local, regional, and
nationwide economic swings as well as promotional activities from
larger, more diversified peers. Cumberland Farms' credit profile is
also constrained by the possibility of increased leverage should
the company make a debt financed acquisition or pay a sizeable
dividend.

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's view that Cumberland
Farms will maintain leverage below 4.5x on a sustained basis and
maintain very good liquidity over the next 12 to 18 months.

Given the company's scale, another ratings upgrade is unlikely in
the near term. Over the longer term ratings could be upgraded if
debt/EBITDA is sustained below 3.5x with EBIT/interest expense
maintained above 4.0x. Ratings could be downgraded if debt/EBITDA
is sustained above 4.5x or EBIT/interest falls below 2.0x.

Headquartered in Westborough, MA, Cumberland Farms, Inc. is a fuel
retailer and convenience store operator in the United States with
563 locations across New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island,
Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine and Florida. Revenue
for the last twelve month period ended December 31, 2018 was about
$4.1 billion. The company does not file public financials.


CYXTERA DC: Moody's Rates $100MM Incremental 1st Lien Loan 'B1'
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B1 rating to Cyxtera DC
Holdings, Inc.'s $100 million incremental first lien term loan.
This offering and a similarly-sized equity investment is credit
positive, with net proceeds being used to pay down the outstanding
revolver balance and for general corporate purposes, including the
funding of data center facility expansions to monetize growth
opportunities in capacity constrained markets. Moody's expects that
the combined net proceeds will sufficiently fund additional and
strategically important discretionary capital spending over the
next two years. This focused expansion better positions Cyxtera to
drive revenue and profitability over the intermediate term but will
meaningfully delay deleveraging over the next two years.

Assignments:

Issuer: Cyxtera DC Holdings, Inc.

Senior Secured 1st lien Term Loan, Assigned B1 (LGD3)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Cyxtera is weakly positioned for its B2 corporate family rating
despite its standing as the second largest global independent data
center operator offering retail colocation and interconnection
services. The rating also incorporates the company's stable base of
contracted recurring revenue, strong network footprint and the
favorable near-term growth trends for data center services
globally. These positive factors are offset by currently high
leverage, weaker than expected revenue and EBITDA growth, execution
difficulties as a standalone entity which may now be abating,
significant industry risks, intensifying competition and the likely
intermediate term need for higher capital intensity to drive
stronger top line growth. Despite relatively low capacity
utilization across most of its facilities, increasing capital
investments to alleviate market-specific capacity constraints are
necessary to better monetize growth opportunities. Moody's expects
Cyxtera will generate negative free cash flow after discretionary
growth capital spending over the next two years before achieving
moderately positive free cash flow in second half 2021.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that Cyxtera will slowly
realize increasing benefits from operating as a standalone entity
with a newly rebuilt and unified sales force, and that bookings and
revenue growth will steadily improve over the next two years and be
sufficient in magnitude to place the company back on track to
debt/EBITDA (Moody's adjusted) of less than 6x by year-end 2021.

Moody's could upgrade Cyxtera's ratings if debt/EBITDA approaches
5.0x and free cash flow/debt was positive, both on a sustained
basis. Moody's could downgrade Cyxtera's ratings if liquidity
deteriorates, or sales force efforts fail to sustainably improve
bookings and revenue growth, or if debt/EBITDA does not decline to
below 6x by year-end 2021.


DELUXE ENTERTAINMENT: Moody's Alters Outlook on B3 CFR to Stable
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed Deluxe Entertainment
Services Group, Inc.'s B3 Corporate Family Rating and B3-PD
Probability of Default Rating. Concurrent with this rating action,
Moody's assigned a B3 rating to the proposed $429 million senior
secured term loan maturing February 2022. The rating outlook was
changed to stable from negative.

Deluxe recently announced plans to spin-off its Deluxe Creative
Services division ("DCS", comprising the Post-Production and Visual
Effects units) for a valuation of roughly $900 million enterprise
value. DCS will become a standalone entity and capitalized
initially with debt and new cash equity sufficient to fund a
shareholder distribution to Deluxe of $500 million, which, in turn,
will use the funds, plus equitization of certain debts owed to the
sponsor, to reduce existing debt by $572 million (net, including
$360 million of $789 million outstanding senior secured term loans
and $59 million of $69 million outstanding ABL facility
borrowings), pay fees and expenses, and add to cash balances. The
company will also seek to amend the existing credit agreements to
downsize the ABL facility, tighten certain provisions and extend
debt maturities by two years. Following the DCS carve-out, Deluxe's
remaining businesses will include Localization, Delivery
Operations, Digital Cinema and Deluxe One. Deluxe will retain 50%
ownership in DCS following the planned equity raise.

Assignments:

Issuer: Deluxe Entertainment Services Group, Inc.

  Senior Secured Term Loan due February 2022, Assigned B3 (LGD3)

Affirmations:

Issuer: Deluxe Entertainment Services Group, Inc.

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B3-PD

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Deluxe Entertainment Services Group, Inc.

  Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

Ratings and outlook actions are subject to review of final
documentation and no material change in the size, terms and
conditions of the proposed transaction as advised to Moody's. Upon
transaction close, Moody's will withdraw the ratings and LGD
assessments on the existing $789 million term loans due February
2020 (includes the 2016 incremental term loan).

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rating outlook change to stable from negative reflects the
elimination of near-term refinancing risk via the extension of debt
maturities, Moody's expectation that Deluxe will repay debt with
proceeds from the planned equity/debt raise for its Creative
Services unit and sustain adequate liquidity over the next twelve
months. It also reflects its expectation that by 2020 Deluxe's
rationalization plan will be mostly complete, leading to improved
GAAP EBITDA, GAAP financial leverage below 5x (Moody's adjusted)
and positive free cash flow generation as severance and
restructuring costs subside, substantial cost savings are realized
and capital expenditures normalize.

Deluxe's B3 CFR reflects the elevated pro forma GAAP financial
leverage after the DCS disposal and limited prospects for
meaningful deleveraging over the coming year given the lack of
positive free cash flow generation and ongoing need to fund
restructuring actions and higher-than-usual capital expenditures,
mainly for the Deluxe One platform buildout. The rating also
recognizes the proposed recapitalization of the balance sheet
designed to reduce leverage by repaying a sizable amount of
outstanding debt via the DCS spin-off/capital raise, as well as the
proposed two-year extension of debt maturities and amendments to
tighten provisions in the credit agreements.

While pro forma gross debt is reduced by nearly 55% from capital
raise proceeds, the company's pro forma GAAP EBITDA decreases
disproportionately due to the loss of sizable EBITDA from DCS
following its spin-off. Consequently, the rating is constrained by
a smaller scale as well as a reduced business focus, concentrated
customer base and revenue linked to the cyclical North American
movie slate.

Deluxe is restructuring its business through efficiency
enhancements and increased automation by developing a cloud-based
B2B self-service technology platform called Deluxe One.
Notwithstanding the improved capital structure, Moody's expects the
restructuring and Deluxe One investments will pressure debt
protection measures this year. Moody's estimates adjusted GAAP
financial leverage will remain high, increasing to around 8.2x
total debt to EBITDA at year end 2019 from 7.1x at LTM 3/31/19
before declining to under 5x in 2020. This leverage metric is
Moody's adjusted, incorporating standard operating lease
adjustments and the expected cumulative realized cost savings
through 2019, however excluding one-time severance and
restructuring costs that will flow through the P&L to achieve
future savings. The rating acknowledges the equity sponsor's
financial support for Deluxe through a $110 million total
commitment to reduce the term loan within 12-18 months after
transaction close. Consequently, by 2020, as the rationalization
program nears completion and nearly 20% of the term loan is repaid,
Moody's expects earnings quality to meaningfully improve leading to
higher GAAP EBITDA, lower GAAP financial leverage in the 4x-5x area
and positive free cash flow generation.

The B3 rating is supported by Deluxe's position as a leading global
provider offering a broad range of outsourced media supply chain
services including Localization (e.g., subtitling, dubbing and
audio services), Delivery Operations (e.g., physical/digital
fulfillment, media cloud and delivery for other LOBs) and Digital
Cinema (e.g., distribution, mastering, keys and content protection
services) to feature film studios and direct-to-consumer OTT
content creators. Its long-term customer relationships are
buttressed by 3-5 year contracts, principally with major accounts.
Deluxe benefits from somewhat high switching costs given its
technical expertise, preferred vendor status and global asset base.
The company also benefits from geographic diversity with 66% of pro
forma revenue from North America, 26% from EMEA and 8% from
Australia. With implementation of the Deluxe One SaaS platform,
Moody's believes there will be opportunities to expand and extend
its services to existing and new clients as the media industry
undergoes transformation.

Moody's expects Deluxe to maintain adequate liquidity supported by
at least $24 million pro forma cash balances at transaction close
offset by negative free cash flow generation over the next 12-15
months. Liquidity is buttressed by the proposed $60 million
extended ABL facility (downsized from $115 million) and new $70
million subordinated line of credit provided by the equity sponsor.
Moody's expects Deluxe will draw under both facilities on a $1 for
$1 basis simultaneously over the coming year to help fund
restructuring costs and higher-then-normal investments and capital
expenditures.

Factors That Could Lead to an Upgrade

Upward ratings pressure is contingent upon Moody's expectation that
Deluxe will sustain total debt to GAAP EBITDA below 5x (Moody's
adjusted), positive free cash flow to debt at or greater than 3%
(Moody's adjusted) and cash balances at or better than forecasted
levels. An upgrade would also require evidence of: (i) profitable
revenue growth in core segments; (ii) growth in film release
volumes; (iii) meeting or exceeding management's financial
projections; (iv) limited pricing pressure; and (v) margin
expansion. Management would also need to demonstrate a commitment
to balance debtholder returns with those of its shareholders and
exhibit operating performance and financial policies consistent
with a higher rating.

Factors That Could Lead to a Downgrade

Ratings could be downgraded if Deluxe's market share in its core
markets were to erode and operating performance were to weaken.
Moody's expectation that management intends to sustain leverage
above 7.5x total debt to GAAP EBITDA (Moody's adjusted), negative
free cash flow generation and diminished liquidity 18 months after
closing the DCS spin-off transaction could result in a downgrade.
Ratings pressure could also occur as a result of cash distributions
to private equity shareholders that weaken liquidity or increase
leverage.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

Headquartered in Burbank, CA, Deluxe Entertainment Services Group,
Inc. is a leading global provider offering a broad range of
outsourced media supply chain services including Localization,
Delivery Operations, Digital Cinema and Deluxe One to feature film
studios and direct-to-consumer OTT content creators. Deluxe will
retain 50% ownership in its Creative Services business following
the unit's carve-out. The company is privately-owned and an
indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings
Inc. Revenue totaled approximately $937 million in fiscal 2018. Pro
forma for the Creative Services disposal, revenue totaled $483
million last year.


ECOSPHERE TECHNOLOGIES: Hires Allan Kalish as Broker
----------------------------------------------------
Ecosphere Technologies, Inc., and Sea of Green Systems, Inc.
received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida to employ Allan Kalish as broker to sell their
assets.

The broker receive a 10% commission of the total sale price.

Mr. Kalish, a minority shareholder of Ecosphere Technologies, has
agreed to waive all his equity and creditor interests in the
bankruptcy estates pursuant to Section 327(a) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

Mr. Kalish maintains an office at:

     Allan Kalish
     2240 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 400A
     West Palm Beach, FL 33409

          About Ecosphere Technologies

Ecosphere Technologies, Inc., is a technology development and
intellectual property licensing company that develops environmental
solutions for global water, energy, industrial and agricultural
markets.  The company helps industries increase production, reduce
costs and protect the environment through a portfolio of unique,
patented technologies: technologies like Ozonix, the Ecos PowerCube
and the Ecos GrowCube, which are available for sale, as well as
exclusive and nonexclusive licensing opportunities across a wide
range of industries and applications throughout the world.  The
Ecosphere technologies and products are available through multiple
brands and subsidiaries that include Sea of Green Systems, Inc.,
Ecosphere Development Company, LLC and Fidelity National
Environmental Solutions, LLC.

Based in Stuart, Fla., Ecosphere Technologies and Sea of Green
Systems sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Lead Case
No. 18-25900) on Dec. 21, 2018.  The Hon. Mindy A. Mora oversees
the cases.  Aaron A. Wernick, Esq., at Furr & Cohen, P.A., is the
Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.

In the petitions signed by Dennis McGuire Sr., chairman and chief
executive officer, Ecosphere Technologies disclosed assets of
$453,403 and liabilities of $14,476,097.  Sea of Green's disclosed
that it had estimated assets and liabilities of between $10 million
and $50 million.


EP ENERGY: Appoints New Director to Fill Vacancy
------------------------------------------------
John J. Hannan had advised the Board of Directors of EP Energy
Corporation of his intent to resign from the Company's Board,
effective May 1, 2019.  Mr. Hannan's resignation did not result
from a disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the
Company's operations, policies or practices including its internal
controls or financial related matters, according to a Form 8-K
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  

Mr. Hannan had served on the Board since 2013 at the direction of
certain affiliates of Apollo Global Management, LLC pursuant to the
Apollo Sponsor's director appointment rights under the Company's
Stockholders Agreement, dated as of Aug. 30, 2013, by and among the
Company and the holders party thereto.

                    Appointment of New Director

On April 29, 2019, the Board appointed Carol Flaton to serve on the
Company's Board, effective May 1, 2019, filling the newly created
vacancy.  Ms. Flaton will also serve on the Board's Audit,
Compensation, and Governance and Nominating Committees.  Ms. Flaton
was appointed as a Class I director, with an initial term expiring
at the Company's 2021 annual meeting of stockholders.

Ms. Flaton has been determined to be an independent director for
purposes of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.
There are no material relationships between Ms. Flaton and any of
the Company's directors, executive officers, or the immediate
family members of any such person and there are no family
relationships between Ms. Flaton and any of the Company's directors
or executive officers.  There are no arrangements or understandings
between Ms. Flaton and any other person pursuant to which Ms.
Flaton was selected as a director, and there are no relationships
that would be reportable as a related party transaction under the
rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.


Ms. Flaton will be compensated in accordance with the Company's
independent director compensation program.

                      About EP Energy LLC

EP Energy LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of EP Energy Corporation
-- http://www.epenergy.com-- is an independent exploration and
production company engaged in the acquisition and development of
unconventional onshore oil and natural gas properties in the United
States.  The Company operates through a diverse base of producing
assets and are focused on providing returns through the development
of its drilling inventory located in three areas: the Permian basin
in West Texas, the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, and the
Altamont Field in the Uinta basin in Northeastern Utah. The Company
is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

EP Energy LLC incurred a net loss of $1 billion for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $203 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, EP Energy had $4.18
billion in total assets, $440 million in total current liabilities,
$4.34 billion in total non-current liabilities, and a total
members' deficit of $599 million.

                           *    *    *

In April 2019, S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating
on exploration and production company EP Energy LLC to 'CCC-' from
'CCC+'.  The downgrade follows heightened concerns surrounding EP
Energy's liquidity as the Company's 10-K included language
questioning its ability to address $182 million in senior unsecured
notes maturing May 2020 while maintaining ongoing operations and
maintenance capital expenditures.

In April 2019, Moody's Investors Service downgraded EP Energy LLC's
Corporate Family Rating to Caa3 from Caa1.  The downgrade of EP
Energy's CFR to Caa3 reflects its weak liquidity, need to repay
$182 million of notes maturing in May 2020 and potential for
continued negative free cash flow in 2019, if production volumes
remain flat.


EXCO RESOURCES: Committee Taps Quinn Emanuel as Co-Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of EXCO Resources,
Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas to hire Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, LLP.

The firm will serve as co-counsel with Brown Rudnick LLP and
Jackson Walker L.L.P., the two other firms representing EXCO and
its affiliates in their Chapter 11 cases.

Quinn Emanuel's hourly rates are:

     Attorneys          $595 - $1,550
     Paralegals         $295 - $330

The firm is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases,
Patricia Tomasco, Esq., a partner at Quinn Emanuel, disclosed that
her firm has not agreed to a variation of its standard billing
arrangements for its employment with the Debtors, and that no Quinn
Emanuel professional has varied his rate based on the geographic
location of the Debtors' bankruptcy cases.

The attorney further disclosed that Quinn Emanuel did not represent
the committee in the 12 months prior to the Debtors' bankruptcy
filing.

Ms. Tomasco also disclosed that the committee has not yet approved
a budget and staffing plan for the firm.

Quinn Emanuel can be reached through:

     Patricia B. Tomasco, Esq.
     Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
     Pennzoil Place
     711 Louisiana St., Suite 500
     Houston, TX 77002
     Phone: +1 713-221-7227 / +1 713 221 7000
     Fax: +1 713 221 7100
     Email: pattytomasco@quinnemanuel.com

                    About EXCO Resources

EXCO Resources, Inc. (otc pink:XCOO) --
http://www.excoresources.com/-- is an oil and natural gas
exploration, exploitation, acquisition, development and production
company headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with principal operations
in Texas, North Louisiana and the Appalachia region.  EXCO's
headquarters are located at 12377 Merit Drive, Suite 1700, Dallas,
Texas.

EXCO Resources, Inc., and 14 of its affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 18-30155) on Jan. 15,
2018.  EXCO disclosed total assets of $829.1 million and total debt
of $1.355 billion as of Sept. 30, 2017.

The Debtors' cases are assigned to the Honorable Marvin Isgur.

The Debtors tapped Gardere Wynee Sewell LLP, and Kirkland & Ellis
LLP, as bankruptcy counsel; PJT Partners LP as financial advisor;
Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as restructuring advisor; and
Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC, as claims agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors.  The committee is represented by lawyers at
Jackson Walker LLP and Brown Rudnick LLP.  Intrepid Partners LLC
and Jefferies LLC serve as the committee's investment bankers.


F.M. BUTT HOTELS: Hires James M. Joyce, Esq. as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
F.M. Butt Hotels Corp., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of New York to employ James M.
Joyce, Esq., as counsel to the Debtor.

F.M. Butt Hotels requires James M. Joyce, Esq.to:

   a. advise the Debtor as to its right, duties and powers as a
      debtor in possession;

   b. prepare and file any statements, schedules, plans or other
      documents or pleadings to be filed by the Debtor in the
      bankruptcy case;

   c. represent the Debtor in all hearings, meetings of
      creditors, conferences, trials and other proceedings in
      the bankruptcy case; and

   d. perform such other legal services as may be necessary in
      connection with the bankruptcy case.

James M. Joyce, Esq.will be paid at the hourly rate of $250.

James M. Joyce, Esq. will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

James M. Joyce, Esq., assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtor and its estates.

James M. Joyce, Esq. can be reached at:

     James M. Joyce, Esq.
     4733 Transit Road
     Lancaster, NY 14043
     Tel: (716) 656-0600
     Fax: (716) 656-0607
     E-mail: jmjoyce@lawyer.com

                 About F.M. Butt Hotels Corp.

F.M. Butt Hotels Corp. owns in fee simple a real estate property
located at 911 Brooks Ave. Rochester with an appraised value of $9
million.  The Company previously sought bankruptcy protection on
March 18, 2019 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-20234).

F.M. Butt Hotels Corp., based in Rochester, NY, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-20310) on April 5, 2019.  In
the petition signed by Naeem W. Butt, president, the Debtor
disclosed $9,386,530 in assets and $6,392,001 in liabilities.
James M. Joyce, Esq., serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


FANNIE MAE: Posts $2.4 Billion Net Income in First Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------
Federal National Mortgage Association, commonly known as Fannie
Mae, has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting net income of $2.40 billion
on $30.54 billion of total interest income for the three months
ended March 31, 2019, compared to net income of $4.26 billion on
$28.51 billion of total interest income for the three months ended
March 31, 2018.

Net interest income was $4.7 billion for the first quarter of 2019,
compared with $5.0 billion for the fourth quarter of 2018.  The
decrease in net interest income for the first quarter of 2019 was
due primarily to lower amortization income from the Company's
guaranty book of business driven by lower mortgage prepayment
activity in the first quarter of 2019 due to a higher prevailing
interest rate environment at the end of 2018.  Additionally, the
company saw a decrease in interest income from its portfolios due
to lower average balances.

As of March 31, 2019, Fannie Mae had $3.42 trillion in total
assets, $3.41 trillion in total liabilities, and $5.36 billion in
total stockholders' equity.

Fannie Mae expects to pay a $2.4 billion dividend to Treasury by
June 30, 2019.  Through the first quarter of 2019, the Company has
paid $179 billion in dividends to Treasury.

Hugh R. Frater, chief executive officer, commented, "Fannie Mae's
solid first quarter financial results demonstrate the strength of
our business model, our risk management capabilities, and our
customer focus.

"We are enhancing our credit risk transfer programs and attracting
more private capital into the U.S. mortgage market.

"We continue to drive technology innovations to help make the
mortgage market more certain, efficient, and simple for our
customers.

"And we're working with customers and partners to address critical
challenges such as the shortage of affordable homes and apartments
across the country."

Business Highlights
  
   * Fannie Mae provided $85.1 billion in liquidity to the
     single-family mortgage market in the first quarter of 2019
     and was the largest issuer of single-family mortgage-related
     securities in the secondary market.  More than 55% of the
     single-family mortgage loans the company acquired were
     affordable to families earning at or below 120% of the area
     median income, providing support for both affordable and
     workforce housing.  The company's estimated market share of
     new single-family mortgage-related securities issuances was
     36% for the first quarter of 2019.

   * Fannie Mae has transferred a portion of the credit risk on
     single-family mortgages with an unpaid principal balance of
     more than $1.6 trillion since 2013, measured at the time of
     the transactions, including $91 billion in the first quarter
     of 2019.  As of March 31, 2019, $1.2 trillion in single-
     family mortgages or approximately 42% of the loans in the
     company's single-family conventional guaranty book of
     business, measured by unpaid principal balance, were covered
     by a credit risk transfer transaction.

   * Fannie Mae provided $16.9 billion in multifamily financing
     in the first quarter of 2019, which supported 171,000 units
     of multifamily housing.  More than 85% of the multifamily
     units the company financed were affordable to families
     earning at or below 120% of the area median income,
     providing support for both affordable and workforce housing.  

     Through the first quarter of 2019, Fannie Mae continued to
     be one of the largest issuers of Green bonds in the world,
     issuing more than $54 billion in Green bonds since inception
     of the program.

   * Fannie Mae continued to share credit risk with lenders on
     nearly 100% of the company's new multifamily business
     volume, primarily through its Delegated Underwriting and
     Servicing (DUS) program.  To complement the company's lender
     loss sharing program through DUS, the company completed its
     fifth multifamily Credit Insurance Risk Transfer (CIRT)
     transaction in the first quarter of 2019, which covered
     multifamily loans with an unpaid principal balance of $11.7
     billion.  As of March 31, 2019, $49 billion in multifamily
     mortgages or 15% of the loans in the company's multifamily
     guaranty book of business, measured by unpaid principal
     balance, were covered by a CIRT transaction.

                  Financial Performance Outlook

Fannie Mae's long-term financial performance will depend in large
part upon both the size of and its share of the U.S. mortgage
market, which in turn will depend upon such factors as population
growth, household formation, and home price appreciation.  While
Fannie Mae expects to remain profitable on an annual basis for the
foreseeable future, certain factors could result in significant
volatility in the company's financial results from quarter to
quarter or year to year.  Fannie Mae expects quarterly volatility
in its financial results due to a number of factors, particularly
changes in market conditions that result in fluctuations in the
estimated fair value of derivatives and other financial instruments
that it marks to market through its earnings.  Other factors that
may result in volatility in the company's quarterly financial
results include factors that affect its loss reserves, such as
redesignations of loans from held for investment to held for sale,
changes in interest rates, home prices or accounting standards, or
events such as natural disasters, and other factors.  Further,
Fannie Mae's implementation on Jan. 1, 2020 of the CECL standard
will likely introduce additional volatility in the company's
results thereafter as credit-related income or expense will include
expected lifetime losses on the company's loans and other financial
instruments subject to the standard and thus become more sensitive
to fluctuations in these factors.

The potential for significant volatility in the company's financial
results could result in a net loss in a future quarter. Fannie Mae
is permitted to retain up to $3.0 billion in capital reserves as a
buffer in the event of a net loss in a future quarter.  However,
any net loss the company experiences in the future could be greater
than the amount of its capital reserves, which would result in a
net worth deficit for that quarter.  For example, Fannie Mae's
implementation of the CECL standard will likely decrease, perhaps
substantially, the company's retained earnings and increase its
allowance for credit losses, which could result in a net worth
deficit when the company adopts the guidance in the first quarter
of 2020.  If the company experiences a net worth deficit in a
future quarter, it will be required to draw funds from Treasury to
avoid being placed into receivership.

          Providing Liquidity and Support to the Market

Fannie Mae provided $102 billion in liquidity to the mortgage
market in the first quarter of 2019.  Through its purchases and
guarantees of mortgage loans in the first quarter of 2019, Fannie
Mae acquired approximately 356,000 single-family mortgage loans.
Fannie Mae also financed approximately 171,000 units of multifamily
housing in the first quarter of 2019.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/0jwP1q

                 About Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Federal National Mortgage Association (OTCQB: FNMA), commonly known
as Fannie Mae -- http://www.FannieMae.com/-- is a
government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) that was chartered by U.S.
Congress in 1938 to support liquidity, stability and affordability
in the secondary mortgage market, where existing mortgage-related
assets are purchased and sold.

A brother organization of Fannie Mae is the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), better known as Freddie Mac. Freddie
Mac (OTCBB: FMCC) -- http://www.FreddieMac.com/-- was established
by Congress in 1970 to provide liquidity, stability and
affordability to the nation's residential mortgage markets.
Freddie Mac supports communities across the nation by providing
mortgage capital to lenders.

                  ABOUT FANNIE MAE'S CONSERVATORSHIP
                     AND AGREEMENTS WITH TREASURY

Fannie Mae has operated under the conservatorship of FHFA since
Sept. 6, 2008.  Treasury has made a commitment under a senior
preferred stock purchase agreement to provide funding to Fannie Mae
under certain circumstances if the company has a net worth deficit.
Pursuant to this agreement and the senior preferred stock the
company issued to Treasury in 2008, the conservator has declared
and directed Fannie Mae to pay dividends to Treasury on a quarterly
basis for every dividend period for which dividends were payable
since the company entered conservatorship in 2008.


FCH MCKINNEY: $290K Sale of McKinney Property to Treadways Approved
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brenda T. Rhoades of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Texas authorized FCH McKinney Senior Homes,
LLC's sale of the real property located at 3716 Creek View Lane,
McKinney, Texas, to Lawrence Treadway and Belinda Treadway for
$290,000.

All ad valorem taxes due and owing to the Tax Assessor for tax
years 2017, 2018 and 2019 in connection with the property, will be
paid in full at closing from the sales proceeds of the requested
sale.  The Collin County Tax Assessor's statutory tax lien will
continue to attach to the subject real property to secure 2019 ad
valorem property taxes assessed against said property.

              About FCH McKinney Senior Homes

FCH McKinney Senior Homes, LLC, operates an assisted living
facility in Dallas, Texas. FCH McKinney filed as a Domestic Limited
Liability Company in the State of Texas on April 10, 2013,
according to public records filed with Texas Secretary of State.

FCH McKinney filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No.
18-42734) on Dec. 3, 2018.  In the petition signed by Kent C.
Conine, manager, the Debtor disclosed less than $50,000 in assets
and less than $10 million in estimated liabilities.  The Debtor is
represented by Larry Kent Hercules, Esq., at Larry K Hercules,
Attorney At Law.


FERNLEY & FERNLEY: Hires Mitchell & Mitchell CPA's as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fernley & Fernley, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to employ Mitchell &
Mitchell CPA's, LLC, as accountant to the Debtor.

Fernley & Fernley requires Mitchell & Mitchell CPA's to prepare the
Debtor's income tax returns required to be filed under the
bankruptcy laws.

Mitchell & Mitchell CPA's will be paid at the hourly rate of $195.

Mitchell & Mitchell CPA's will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Jeffrey S. Mitchell, partner of Mitchell & Mitchell CPA's, LLC,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Mitchell & Mitchell CPA's can be reached at:

     Jeffrey S. Mitchell
     MITCHELL & MITCHELL CPA'S, LLC
     1215 West Baltimore Pike, Suite 15
     Media, PA 19063
     Tel: (610) 566-0101
     Fax: (610) 566-8827

                    About Fernley & Fernley

Founded in 1886, Fernley & Fernley, Inc., is one of the most
distinguished association management companies in the nation.

Bases in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Fernley & Fernley filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of title 11, United
States Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 18-16122) on Sept. 14, 2018,
estimating under $1 million in assets and liabilities.  Ellen M.
McDowell, Esq., at McDowell Law, PC, is the Debtor's counsel.



FFORDABLE BUILDING: $1.25M Sale of All Remaining Assets Approved
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brenda T. Rhoades of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for Eastern
District of Texas authorized Affordable Building Systems, LLC,
doing business as Durra Building Systems, to sell substantially all
remaining assets consisting of real estate of 21.343 acres, more
or less, situated at 2747 State Hwy 160, Whitewright, Grayson
County, Texas, and the improvements situated thereon, and the
personal property remaining on the premises, to Nicholas A. Smith
or Assigns for a total consideration of $1.25 million.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances.
All liens, claims and encumbrances in and to the Property will
attach to the net sales proceeds.

The s that secure all amounts ultimately owed for year 2019 ad
valorem property taxes will remain attached to the Property and
become the responsibility of the Buyer.

Security Title, Inc. of Sherman, Texas, is approved to serve as the
closing agent for the sale, and is authorized to pay from the $1.25
million sales proceeds the following: (i) ABS's share of usual and
customary closing costs (i.e. title insurance, land survey, UCC
title search, document preparation fees and recording costs, etc.);
(ii) for release of Jack Norman's deed of trust lien in the
principal amount of $5,092; (iii) for release of the Texas Work
Force Commission's statutory lien in the principal amount of
$44,968; and (iv) the net sales proceeds to Movants' Disbursing
Agent: Donald Johnston, for distribution in accordance with
Movant's Chapter 11 Plan.

The 14-day period otherwise imposed by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004 (h)
will not be applicable to the Order.

                   About Affordable Building

Affordable Building Systems, LLC, doing business as Durra Building
Systems, sought Chapter 11 protection (bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No.
11-43655) on Dec. 5, 2011.  In the petition signed by John Parker
Burg, president, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1
million to $10 million.  The Debtor tapped Donald L. Johnston,
Esq., at Law Office of Donald Johnston as counsel.


GARDNER DENVER: Moody's Affirms Ba3 CFR Amid Ingersoll Rand Deal
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the ratings of Gardner Denver,
Inc. including its Ba3 and Ba3-PD Corporate Family Rating and
Probability of Default Rating, respectively, Ba3 senior secured
rating and SGL-1 Speculative Grade Liquidity rating, following the
announcement that it has entered into a definitive agreement to be
combined with the Industrial business of Ingersoll-Rand Plc. The
outlook is positive.

The proposed combination is being structured as a Reverse Morris
Trust transaction with Gardner Denver combining with
Ingersoll-Rand's Industrial business for an implied approximate
11.0x EBITDA multiple (excluding synergies). The purchase
consideration is expected to include $1.9 billion of debt and
$5.8bn equity consideration.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's views Gardner Denver's planned combination with IR's
Industrial business as credit positive given the more than two fold
increase in the company's revenues, increased end-market
diversification and complementary product portfolio that would
result from the transaction. Pro forma for the planned transaction,
Gardner Denver's debt/EBITDA remains essentially neutral (including
Moody's standard adjustments) at approximating 2.6x. Going forward,
Moody's anticipates that the company will be able to realize cost
synergies from the combined businesses through manufacturing and
supply chain efficiencies as well as streamlining costs. The
adoption of both Gardner Denver and Ingersoll-Rand's business
operating systems and operating excellence measures should also
contribute to improvement of the combined company's margins.
However, the company's announced $250 million of anticipated
annualized synergies from the planned combination in three-years is
sizable and Moody's expects that it would take several years for
those synergies to become evident.

Positively, Gardner Denver and Ingersoll-Rand's product portfolio
complement each other and include well-established and recognized
brands. End-market diversification will increase with Gardner
Denver's highly cyclical energy end-market exposure pro forma for
the proposed transaction decreasing to roughly 10% of revenues
versus approximately 25% at 2018 year-end. Given both entities' low
capital intensity with 2-3% of capex/revenue and track record of
strong cash flow generation, Moody's expects that the combination
will result in a solid free cash flow profile. In addition, KKR's
ownership of the company is expected to be reduced to approximately
17% through the proposed combination due to the equity portion of
the consideration, thereby decreasing event risk.

Pro forma for the planned combination, the company's margin profile
is expected to weaken over the short-term given Ingersoll-Rand
Industrial's lower margins versus Gardner Denver with the
expectation that margins will revert to Gardner Denver's current
approximate 25% reported EBITDA margins during the course of three
to four years. In addition, the proposed transaction is a very
sizable combination for Gardner Denver and integration risk from
the combination as well as costs to effectuate the transaction and
achieve expected synergies are credit considerations. Furthermore,
the absolute amount of funded debt would essentially double pro
forma for the transaction.

Gardner Denver's Ba3 CFR continues to reflect its well-established
position in engineered products, diversity by end-market and
geography, healthy margins and good free cash flow generation. The
company's EBITDA margins are supported by its brand strength in
mission critical applications in its core energy, industrial and
medical segments as well as the benefits from restructuring
efforts. The company possesses a relatively large scale within its
market, a sizable aftermarket business (grown to approximately 40%
of sales) and diversity by end-market and geography with roughly
half of sales generated abroad. These factors temper the high
degree of cyclicality in certain of its end-markets such as oil and
gas drilling and economically-sensitive industrial businesses.

The company's speculative grade liquidity rating was affirmed at
SGL-1, reflecting Moody's expectation that the company will
maintain very good liquidity supported by strong free cash flow
generation, a sizable cash balance, and lack of meaningful debt
maturities over the next 12-15 months.

The positive outlook is based both on the expectation that the
company will continue to organically grow revenue at the mid-single
digit level or above due to positive order trends and realize
synergies such that debt/EBITDA remains at the mid-2.0x range over
the next twelve to eighteen months together with the potential
benefits in terms of scale, market position and diversification
from its pending combination with Ingersoll-Rand's Industrial
business. The continued reduction in KKR's ownership interest is
also reflected in the outlook change.

Moody's took the following rating actions on Gardner Denver, Inc.:

Ratings Affirmed:

  Corporate Family Rating, Ba3

  Probability of Default Rating, Ba3-PD

  $270 million senior secured revolving credit facility due 2020,
  Ba3 (LGD3)

  $1.3 billion senior secured term loan due 2024, Ba3 (LGD3)

  EUR615 million senior secured term loan due 2024, Ba3 (LGD3)

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, at SGL-1

Outlook Action:

Outlook, changed to Positive, from Stable

An upward rating action would be driven by a continued increase in
revenue scale through organic growth and acquisitions that increase
the company's revenue base and diversification without adding to
the company's leverage profile. Expectations of debt-to-EBITDA
improving to and sustained in the high 2x level, EBITA-to-interest
exceeding 5.0x on a sustained basis and free cash flow-to-debt in
excess of 15% while maintaining strong liquidity would support an
upgrade. A normalized governance structure with a diverse group of
shareholders that balances debt and equity holders would also be
considered.

The ratings could be downgraded if revenue and earnings
deteriorate, debt-to-EBITDA exceeds 3.5x, EBITA-to-interest
coverage weakens to below 3.0x and is sustained at those levels, or
liquidity meaningfully erodes. An aggressive financial policy such
as debt-financed share repurchases from KKR or the open market,
introduction of a meaningful recurring dividend, or sizable
acquisitions could also lead to a downgrade.


GNC HOLDINGS: Files Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31
------------------------------------------------------------
GNC Holdings, Inc., has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $15.26 million on $564.8 million of revenue for the three months
ended March 31, 2019, compared to net income of $6.19 million on
$607.5 million of revenue for the three months ended March 31,
2018.

As of March 31, 2019, GNC Holdings had $1.77 billion in total
assets, $1.74 billion in total liabilities, $211.4 million in
convertible preferred stock, and a $189.08 million in total
stockholders' deficit.

As of March 31, 2019, the Company had $74.2 million available under
a Revolving Credit Facility, after giving effect to $6.2 million
utilized to secure letters of credit and $0.6 million reduction to
borrowing ability as a result of decrease in net collateral.  The
Company said its ability to make scheduled payments of principal
on, to pay interest on or to refinance its debt and to satisfy its
other debt obligations will depend on its future operating
performance, which will be affected by general economic, financial
and other factors beyond its control.  The Company expects to make
an excess cash flow payment between $25 million and $35 million at
50% with respect to the year ending Dec. 31, 2019, which is
expected to be paid in the second quarter of 2020.

"We currently anticipate that cash generated from operations,
together with amounts available under the Revolving Credit
Facility, will be sufficient to service our debt (including the
expected excess cash flow payment), meet our operating expenses and
fund capital expenditures over the next 12 months," the Company
stated in the Report.  "If all outstanding amounts under the
convertible senior notes ("Notes") in excess of $50.0 million have
not been repaid, refinanced, converted or effectively discharged
prior to May 2020 ("Springing Maturity Date"), the maturity date of
the Tranche B-2 becomes the Springing Maturity Date, subject to
certain adjustments.  In the event that a refinancing does not
occur before the Springing Maturity Date, management believes that
the Company will have the ability to repay $138.6 million of the
Notes with projected cash on hand and the Revolving Credit
Facility.  We are currently in compliance with our debt covenant
reporting and compliance obligations under our Credit Facilities
and expect to remain in compliance during 2019."

Cash provided by operating activities increased by $43.6 million
from $25.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 to
$68.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 due to
favorable working capital changes primarily due to an increase in
accounts payable as a result of the Company's cash management
efforts and the increase in accounts payable related to the
establishment of the Manufacturing JV.

Cash provided by investing activities was $85.6 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2019 compared with cash used in
investing activities of $3.4 million for the same period in 2018
primarily due to the $101 million cash proceeds received from IVC
in exchange for 57% ownership in the Manufacturing JV.  In
addition, the Company made a capital contribution of $10.7 million
to the Manufacturing JV for its share of short-term working capital
needs and contributed $2.4 million cash from its China business to
the China joint ventures.  Capital expenditures for the three
months ended March 31, 2019 was $3.0 million compared with $3.7
million for the same period in 2018.

The Company expects capital expenditures to be approximately $20 to
$30 million in 2019, which includes investments for store
development, IT infrastructure and maintenance.  The Company
anticipates funding its 2019 capital requirements with cash flows
from operations and, if necessary, borrowings under the Revolving
Credit Facility.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019, cash used in financing
activities was $84.4 million, primarily consisting of $147 million
in payments on the Tranche B-1 Term Loan, $114 million in payments
on the Tranche B-2 Term Loan, a $10.4 million original issuance
discount paid to the Tranche B-2 Term Loan lender at 2% of the
outstanding balance, and $12.6 million in fees paid for the
issuance of convertible preferred stock, partially offset by
approximately $200 million of proceeds from the issuance of
convertible preferred stock.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                        https://is.gd/sVVpGC

                        About GNC Holdings

GNC Holdings, Inc., headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA, is a global
health and wellness brand with a diversified, multi-channel
business.  The Company's assortment of performance and nutritional
supplements, vitamins, herbs and greens, health and beauty, food
and drink and other general merchandise features innovative
private-label products as well as nationally recognized third-party
brands, many of which are exclusive to GNC.  As of March 31, 2019,
GNC had approximately 8,200 locations, of which approximately 6,000
retail locations are in the United States (including approximately
2,100 Rite Aid licensed store-within-a-store locations) and the
remainder are franchise locations in approximately 50 countries.

GNC Holdings reported net income of $69.78 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $150.26 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, GNC Holdings
had $1.52 billion in total assets, $1.54 billion in total
liabilities, $98.80 million in Series A convertible preferred
stock, and a stockholders' deficit of $114.31 million.

                           *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on Nov. 15, 2018, S&P Global Ratings
affirmed its 'CCC+' issuer credit rating on Pittsburgh-based
vitamin and supplement retailer GNC Holdings Inc. and removed all
of its ratings on the company from CreditWatch, where S&P placed
them with negative implications on Feb. 14, 2018.  "The affirmation
reflects our belief that GNC's capital structure remains
unsustainable over the long term in light of its current operating
performance, including its cash flow generation, because of
increased competitive threats amid the ongoing secular changes in
the retail industry.


GOGO INC: Launches $20 Million Senior Secured Notes Offering
------------------------------------------------------------
Gogo Inc. has commenced a private offering of $20 million aggregate
principal amount of additional 9.875% senior secured notes due 2024
to be issued by its direct wholly owned subsidiary, Gogo
Intermediate Holdings LLC, and its indirect wholly owned
subsidiary, Gogo Finance Co. Inc.  The initial 9.875% Senior
Secured Notes due 2024 were issued in an aggregate principal amount
of $905 million on April 25, 2019.  On May 3, 2019, the Issuers
obtained the consent of the majority of the holders of the Initial
Notes (excluding Initial Notes held by the Issuers or any
affiliates of the Issuers) to amend the indenture that governs the
Initial Notes to increase the amount of indebtedness under Credit
Facilities (as defined in the indenture) that may be incurred by
$20 million.  The Additional Notes and the Initial Notes will be
treated as the same series for all purposes under the indenture and
collateral agreements that govern the Initial Notes and will govern
the Additional Notes.  The Additional Notes will be guaranteed on a
senior secured basis by Gogo Inc. and all of Holdings LLC's
existing and future restricted subsidiaries (other than the
Co-Issuer), subject to certain exceptions.  The Additional Notes
and the related guarantees will be secured by first-priority liens
(subject to certain exceptions) on substantially all of the
Issuers' and the Guarantors' assets, including pledged equity
interests of the Issuers and (subject to certain exceptions) all of
Holdings LLC's existing and future restricted subsidiaries
guaranteeing the Notes, except for certain excluded assets and
subject to permitted liens.  There can be no assurance that the
proposed offering of Additional Notes will be completed.

The Issuers intend to use the net proceeds from the sale of the
Additional Notes for general corporate purposes.

The Additional Notes and the guarantees will be offered in a
private offering exempt from the registration requirements of the
United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  The Additional
Notes and the guarantees will be offered only to qualified
institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act
and to non-U.S. persons outside the United States in reliance on
Regulation S under the Securities Act.

The Additional Notes and the guarantees have not been registered
under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold in the
United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from
the registration requirements of the Securities Act and applicable
state laws.

                         About Gogo

Gogo Inc. -- http://www.gogoair.com/-- is a global provider of
broadband connectivity products and services for aviation.  The
Company designs and sources innovative network solutions that
connect aircraft to the Internet and develop software and platforms
that enable customizable solutions for and by its aviation
partners.  Gogo's products and services can be found on thousands
of aircraft operated by global commercial airlines and thousands of
private aircraft, including those of the largest fractional
ownership operators.  Gogo is headquartered in Chicago, IL, with
additional facilities in Broomfield, CO, and locations across the
globe.

Gogo reported a net loss of $162.03 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $172.0 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, Gogo Inc. had $1.26
billion in total assets, $1.53 billion in total liabilities, and a
total stockholders' deficit of $268.8 million.

                           *   *   *

As reported by the TCR on April 18, 2019, Moody's Investors Service
changed the outlook on Gogo Inc. to stable from negative.
Concurrently, Moody's has affirmed Gogo's corporate family rating
at Caa1.  Moody's said that despite the improvement in liquidity,
Gogo's Caa1 CFR remains warranted given the company's high leverage
which Moody's expects at around 9.9x (Moody's adjusted debt/EBITDA)
by end 2019 along with the continued need for Gogo to invest
heavily in technology and equipment installs to pursue its growth
ambitions outside of North America.  Gogo's Caa1 also reflects the
company's small scale relative to other players in the wider
telecommunications industry as well as the highly competitive
environment it operates in.

S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'CCC+' issuer credit rating on Gogo
Inc, according to a TCR report dated April 19, 2019.  S&P said the
company's proposed refinancing of its capital structure will boost
its short-term liquidity by extending the maturity profile of its
obligations but the rating agency expects the company to burn cash
over the next year.  The rating agency said it affirmed its 'CCC+'
issuer credit rating because it does not envision a default within
the next year.


GOODYEAR TIRE: Moody's Cuts CFR to Ba3 & Alters Outlook to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded the ratings of The Goodyear
Tire & Rubber Company including the Corporate Family and
Probability of Default ratings to Ba3 from Ba2, and Ba3-PD from
Ba2-PD, respectively. In a related action Moody's downgraded
Goodyear's senior secured second-lien term loan, to Ba1 from Baa3;
senior unsecured guaranteed notes to B1 from Ba3, senior unsecured
unguaranteed notes to B2 from B1; and on Goodyear Europe B.V.'s
senior unsecured guaranteed notes to Ba2 from Ba1. The Speculative
Grade Liquidity Rating is downgraded to SGL-3 from SGL-2. The
rating outlook is stable.

The following ratings were downgraded:

Downgrades:

Issuer: Goodyear Europe B.V.

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to
  Ba2 (LGD2) from Ba1 (LGD2)

Issuer: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)

  Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to Ba3-PD from Ba2-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to Ba3 from Ba2

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Downgraded to Ba1 (LGD2)
  from Baa3 (LGD2)

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to B2 (LGD6)

  from B1 (LGD6)

  GTD Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to B1
  (LGD4) from Ba3 (LGD4)

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Downgraded to SGL-3 from
  SGL-2

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Goodyear Europe B.V.

  Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

Issuer: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)

  Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

The downgrade of Goodyear's CFR to Ba3 incorporates Moody's view
that the company's pricing actions, rationalization initiatives in
Germany, and other cost savings programs initiated to help mitigate
ongoing elevated raw material cost pressures could be effective
over the longer term, but are unlikely to restore Debt/EBITDA to
below 3x, or EBITA/Interest to above 3x over the intermediate-term.
Moody's believes these actions will help mitigate raw material cost
headwinds of approximately $300 million expected by Goodyear in
2019. Yet, there are other industry pressures including the
slowdown in global automotive original equipment manufacturer
sales, and industry expectations of flattish replacement tire
volumes in the U.S. For the LTM period ending March 31, 2019
Goodyear's Debt/EBITDA, and EBITA/interest approximated 4.4x and
2.2x, respectively (inclusive of Moody's adjustments. Further,
while the company's actions will help mitigate expected raw
material cost headwinds over the next several months, additional
actions will be need to restore profits to levels experienced in
2016. Goodyear's EBITDA has deteriorated by approximately $475
million (as adjusted by Moody's) from year-end 2016 to year-end
2018.

Goodyear's Ba3 CFR will continue to be supported by the company's
strong global competitive position in the automotive aftermarket
and longstanding customer relationships with automotive original
equipment manufacturers, which supports aftermarket sales.
Goodyear's broad geographic revenue base has helped diversify the
impact of business conditions in one particular region. Goodyear's
continues to outpace industry trade association member replacement
tire volume growth rates in higher margin =17 inch tire category in
both the U.S. and European regions. Management also has prudently
discontinued share repurchases to preserve liquidity, as the
company operates through challenging industry conditions.

The stable rating outlook reflects the expectation that Goodyear's
Debt/EBITDA will remain in the 4.5x range over the next 12-18
months before the impact of pricing actions by the company will
start to offset the effect of expected raw material cost
increases.

Goodyear's Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating of SGL-3 incorporates
Moody's expectation continued strong availability under the
company's credit facilities, balanced by weaker cash balances, and
anticipated weak cash flow generation over the next 12-15 months.
As of March 31, 2019, the $2.0 billion ABL revolving credit
facility had $285 million of borrowings and $37 million of letters
of credit outstanding resulting in $1.3 billion of availability
after considering the borrowing base. The facility matures in 2021.
Goodyear's Euro 800 million revolving credit facility (recently
increased from Euro 550 million) had $140 million of borrowings and
the pan-European accounts receivable securitization facility was
fully utilized at $246 million. As of March 31, 2019, Goodyear's
global cash on hand approximated $860 million (excluding $50
million of restricted cash) which is lower than historical trends
of over $1 billion. Moody's expects Goodyear to generate close to
breakeven free cash flow over the next 12-15 months due to
headwinds from raw material costs and flattish volumes. Also,
pressuring Goodyear's liquidity profile is the August 2020 $282
million 8.75% note maturity. This maturity could be funded with
availability under the revolvers. However, Goodyear's competitive
position a strong supplier of automotive OEM and aftermarket
suppliers should support access to the capital markets. The
covenant test under the $2.0 billion ABL revolver is a coverage
ratio which comes into effect only when availability, plus cash
balances of the parent and guarantor subsidiaries under the
facility, goes below $200 million, which is unlikely to occur in
the near-term.

Important to Goodyear's liquidity profile is its ability to factor
receivables. At March 31, 2019 the gross amount of receivables sold
was $550 million. Moody's consider this a potential funding risk if
markets are not available to enter into further factoring
arrangements.

The ratings on the Goodyear Europe B.V. senior unsecured Euro notes
include a one-notch down override. The override considers the
recent increase in the size and potential usage of the secured
revolving credit facility at this entity.

A higher rating over the near term is unlikely. Over the long-term,
a higher rating could result from sustained improving demand which
supports widening profit margins and debt reduction. A higher
rating could result from EBITA/interest approaching 3.0x, and
debt/EBITDA approaching 3.0x.

A lower rating could result if industry conditions deteriorate
through weakening volume trends, competitive pressures, or
increasing raw material costs which are not offset by improved
product mix, pricing, or restructuring actions. EBITA margins
expected to approach 3% on a sustained basis, the inability to
generate positive free cash flow sufficient to maintain debt/EBITDA
below 4.5x, or EBITA/Interest above 2x could also result in a
downgrade. Ratings pressure could also arise from a meaningful
decline in the liquidity profile.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was the Global
Automotive Supplier Industry published in June 2016. Please see the
Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this
methodology.

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, based in Akron, OH, is one of
the world's largest tire companies with 47 manufacturing facilities
in 21 countries around the world. Revenues for the LTM period
ending March 31, 2019 were approximately $15.2 billion.


GOODYEAR TIRE: S&P Alters Outlook to Neg., Affirms 'BB' Debt Rating
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on The Goodyear Tire &
Rubber Co. (Goodyear) to negative from stable and affirmed its 'BB'
issuer credit rating. In addition, the 'BBB-' issue-level ratings
on its second-lien secured debt and 'BB' rating on its senior
unsecured notes are affirmed.

Goodyear has not yet raised prices sufficiently to recover
increases in raw material costs over the last two years, which has
put pressure on the company's sales and profitability. Other
factors, such as declining OE production, are adding to these
pressures. S&P assumes for the rating that the company is able to
maintain a debt-to-EBITDA ratio below 4.0x and free operating cash
flow (FOCF)-to-debt ratio above 10%.

"Our negative outlook on Goodyear reflects our view that there is
at least a one-third chance that we could lower the issuer credit
rating if we came to believe the company could not generate a
FOCF-to-debt ratio of at least 10% over the next 12 months, because
the company is unable to sufficiently recover past increases in
commodity costs," S&P said.

S&P said it could lower its rating on Goodyear if the company is
unable to raise prices sufficiently to recover past increases in
raw material costs, or if declining global tire demand makes it
unlikely that Goodyear could maintain metrics in line with the
rating agency's expectations for the current financial risk
profile, namely: a debt-to-EBITDA ratio below 4.0x and a
FOCF-to-debt ratio above 10% on a sustained basis.

"We could consider revising the outlook back to stable if we came
to believe that the company is able to generate a FOCF-to-debt
ratio of at least 10% and maintain a debt-to-EBITDA metric of less
than 4x on a sustained basis," S&P said, adding that this could
occur if the company is able to recover raw material costs by
increasing price, if it can materially streamline operating
expenses, thereby expanding margins, or if it pursues a program of
meaningful debt reduction.


GRCDALLASHOMES LLC: Case Summary & 12 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: GRCDallasHomes LLC
        13220 Beach Club Road
        The Colony, TX 75056

Business Description: GRCDallasHomes LLC is a real estate investor

                      in The Colony, Texas.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 3, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Texas (Sherman)

Case No.: 19-41186

Judge: Hon. Brenda T. Rhoades

Debtor's Counsel: Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq.
                  JOYCE W. LINDAUER ATTORNEY, PLLC
                  12720 Hillcrest Road, Suite 625
                  Dallas, TX 75230
                  Tel: (972) 503-4033
                  Fax: (972) 503-4034
                  E-mail: joyce@joycelindauer.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Kazem Daneshmandi, member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 12 unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/txeb19-41186.pdf


GTT COMMUNICATIONS: Fitch Affirms 'B' LT Issuer Default Rating
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed GTT Communications, Inc. and GTT
Communications BV's Long-Term Issuer Default Rating at 'B'. The
Rating Outlook is Stable. Fitch has also affirmed the 'BB-'/'RR2'
rating for the company's $200 million first-lien secured revolver,
$1.8 billion first-lien secured term loan, and EUR$750 million
first-lien secured term loan. In addition, Fitch has affirmed the
rating for the company's $575 million senior unsecured notes at
'CCC+'/'RR6'.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Debt Funded M&A: Fitch expects GTT Communications, Inc. to maintain
pro forma gross leverage between 4.5x and 5.5x over the rating
horizon as the company continues to pursue and execute on multiple
acquisitions annually. These transactions are expected to be
primarily debt funded in order to minimize equity dilution. Fitch
recognizes that acquisitions can provide increased scale in a
capital-intensive industry; however, Fitch is also aware of the
risk of delays in the integration process, and shortfalls in
expected synergies.

Elevated Leverage: Fitch believes management's historical track
record of maintaining net leverage above the upper end of its
target range is a constraint to the rating. Total net leverage was
near 6x as of Dec. 31, 2018, based on a pro forma EBITDA that
includes all prior acquisitions and expected cost synergies. Fitch
expects the company will be below its established negative gross
leverage sensitivity of 5.5x within the next 12 months on a pro
forma basis as a result of synergies and continued EBITDA growth.
Fitch would only expect GTT's leverage to decline towards the lower
end of management's target range in a less intensive M&A
environment.

Recurring Revenue and Contract Matching: Fitch expects the
recurring nature of GTT's revenue to provide a significant amount
of stability and visibility into future cash generation. Over 90%
of the company's revenue is recurring with contracts generally
ranging between one to three years. GTT will typically match the
contract length of its last mile leases with the customer's
contract length in order to insulate itself from price
fluctuations. Approximately 80% of the company's network costs are
related to these last mile leases, providing the company with a
significant amount of capacity to downsize if customers choose not
to renew.

Strong Secular Trends: GTT's credit profile benefits from the
ongoing secular trends its industry is experiencing. Enterprises
are continuing to increase their demand for networking bandwidth
due to the rapid adoption of cloud-based applications and an
increasing amount of data usage across locations as a result of
increasing files sizes, voice, video conferencing and real-time
collaboration tools.

Competitive Position and Limited Scale: Fitch believes GTT's modest
scale provides the company with limited room for operational
headwinds or unexpected industry shifts. Many of the company's
competitors are significantly larger, better capitalized, and have
a stronger market presence. The company's capex-lite business model
places it in a slightly inferior competitive position due to its
dependency on third party providers for fiber connectivity, which
is primarily in the last mile where there are significantly less
providers of fiber connectivity. Fitch believes this dependency is
somewhat mitigated by the company's partial ownership of its core
network.

Customer Diversification, Supplier Concentration: Fitch expects the
company's credit profile to continue to benefit from broad customer
diversification. GTT's largest customer accounted for less than 5%
of monthly recurring revenue, while its top 20 customers are
expected to have made up less than 25% of MRR. These customers are
multi-national corporations with significant access to capital and
liquidity. Fitch believes the majority of the company's monthly
recurring costs are tied to its top 20 suppliers. GTT's diverse
base of over 3,500 suppliers partially mitigates risks stemming
from the potential for increased margin pressure related to
supplier pricing.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

The ratings reflect the company's highly recurring revenue and
diversified customer base, the strong secular trends driving
industry demand, and its profitability on an EBITDA less capex
basis. Fitch expects these factors to provide a significant amount
of visibility for and stability to the company's cash flows over
the rating horizon. The ratings also incorporate Fitch's
expectation for a high level of M&A activity over the rating
horizon. Forecasted transactions are expected to be majority
debt-funded in order to minimize equity dilution and drive equity
returns. This acquisitive posture introduces integration risks to
the company's credit profile and drives Fitch's expectation for
leverage to remain at an elevated level over the rating horizon.
Fitch believes these factors position the company well in the 'B'
rating category relative to similarly rated peers, such as
CenturyLink, Frontier Communications Corp, and Uniti Group Inc.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer
          
  -- Revenue growth in the high single-digits at GTT, and low
     single-digit revenue growth at Interoute.

  -- Annual spend on small acquisitions between $100 million
     and $200 million per year, and one large acquisition in
     fiscal 2021.

  -- Overall EBITDA margin expansion toward 30% due to
     increased scale and approximately $55 million of
     remaining cost synergies, as of fiscal year end 2018,
     related to Interoute. EBITDA margin expansion is expected to
     be hampered by smaller acquisitions that are expected to
     be lower margin than the overall company.

  -- Acquisition related charges near $50 million per year.

  -- Capital intensity expanding toward 7% due to larger
     acquisitions that are expected to be more asset-heavy,
     similar to Interoute and Hibernia.

GTT's Recovery Ratings reflect Fitch's expectation that the
enterprise value for the company, and, hence, the Recovery Rating
for its creditors will be maximized as a going concern rather than
in liquidation. Fitch estimates a distressed enterprise valuation
of $2.6 billion, using a 5.5x multiple and an approximate $480
million going concern EBITDA. Fitch's going concern EBITDA
assumption is primarily driven by margin pressure from last mile
providers, resulting in a decline from LTM pro forma EBITDA. Its
5.5x emergence multiple assumption is reflective of the company's
asset-lite business model, partially offset by the acquisition of
Hibernia and Interoute. The multiple is also in line with the
median for telecom companies published in Fitch's Telecom, Media
and Technology Bankruptcy Enterprise Values and Creditor Recoveries
report and historical trading multiples in the telecom sector. The
senior secured euro tranche term loan is considered pari passu with
the debt located at GTT due to the collateral allocation mechanism
that would come into effect during a bankruptcy.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments that May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- Gross leverage sustained at or below 4.5x;

  -- FCF to total adjusted debt sustained in the
     mid-single-digit range.

Developments that May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- Gross leverage sustained at or above 5.5x;

  -- FCF to total adjusted debt approaching zero;

  -- Delays in the integration process, or shortfalls
     in the expected synergies of current or future
     acquisitions.

LIQUIDITY

Solid Liquidity: Fitch expects GTT's liquidity to remain solid over
the rating horizon. As of December 2018, liquidity was supported by
$55 million of cash on hand, $130 million available under its new
revolver, and Fitch's expectation for the company to generate close
to $100 million of FCF in 2019. The company's financial flexibility
is also enhanced by the lenient 1% amortization schedule under its
term loan.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

GTT Communications, Inc.

  -- Long-term IDR at 'B'; Outlook Stable;

  -- Senior secured revolving credit facility at
     'BB-'/'RR2';

  -- Senior secured USD term loan at 'BB-'/'RR2';

  -- 7.875% senior unsecured notes at 'CCC+'/'RR6'.

GTT Communications BV

  -- Long-term IDR at 'B'; Outlook Stable;

  -- Senior secured EUR term loan at 'BB-'/'RR2'.


GUITAR CENTER: Moody's Alters Outlook on Caa1 CFR to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service revised Guitar Center Inc.'s rating
outlook to stable from negative. GCI's Caa1 Corporate Family Rating
and Caa1-PD Probability of Default Rating were affirmed along with
the company's Caa1 senior secured and Caa3 senior unsecured note
ratings.

The outlook revision to stable from negative considers the
continuation and sustainability of the modest improvement in GCI's
consolidated revenue and EBITDA performance that has taken place
during the past twelve months. Despite having one less week in the
current fiscal year-ended February 2, 2019, GCI's net sales grew
about 1.5% while consolidated EBITDA on a Moody's adjusted basis
grew about 3%.

The stable outlook also incorporates its view that a majority of
GCI's ABL facility will remain drawn throughout the year as the
company does not typically hold a material amount of cash on it's
balance sheet, and is also not likely to generate enough free cash
flow after all debt service and capital spending to material reduce
ABL amounts outstanding.

The affirmation of GCI's Caa1 Corporate Family Rating considers
that despite recent and expected further modest improvements in
sales and EBITDA, Moody's expects GCI will remain highly leveraged
with debt/EBITDA on a Moody's adjusted basis at about 6.1 times.
This high leverage, combined with the relatively limited revenue
visibility regarding the retail environment for musical
instruments, will challenge the company's ability to improve its
leverage by October 2020, about one year prior to the proposed
senior secured note maturity date. As a result, GCI's Caa1
Corporate Family Rating continues to incorporate some level of
refinancing risk.

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Guitar Center Inc.

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

Affirmations:

Issuer: Guitar Center Inc.

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Caa1-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Caa1

  Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed
  Caa1 (LGD4)

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed
  Caa3 (LGD5)

RATINGS RATIONALE

GCI's credit profile (Caa1 stable) considers that the company
remains highly leveraged with debt/EBITDA on a Moody's adjusted
basis at about 6.1 times. Additionally, while GCI offers a broad
array of musical instruments and related products, in general, the
company's product offering is targeted to a very specific type of
customer. GCI's products also have a high discretionary component
to them. This, combined with GCI's high leverage, limits the
company's operating and financial flexibility. The Caa1 Corporate
Family Rating also incorporates some level of refinancing risk as
Moody's does not expect any material improvement in GCI's leverage
by October 2020, about one year prior to the proposed senior
secured note maturity date.

Positive rating consideration is given to GCI's well-regarded
reputation as a retailer of musical instruments and recording
tools. Within the highly fragmented specialty retailing segment for
musical instrument sales and rentals, the company has a highly
recognized brand name among its core customers. GCI is also the
largest retailer of music products in the United States based on
revenues, and as a result, enjoys tangible advantages in sourcing,
merchandising, and operations relative to other music retailers
because of its dominant market position within this very narrow
retail segment.

A higher rating requires that GCI push out its debt maturities
without any impairment as well as improve its credit metrics --
achieve and maintain debt/EBITDA on a Moody's adjusted basis below
5.5 times. A higher rating would also require further demonstrated
earnings stability. Ratings could be downgraded if earnings or
margins deteriorate, debt/EBITDA increases much above its current
level, and/or it appears there will any level of impairment to
existing creditors as part of any future refinancing effort by
GCI.

GCI is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guitar Center Holdings, Inc.
The company has three reportable business segments, comprised of
Guitar Center, Musician's Friend and Music & Arts. GCI's parent
company, Guitar Center Holdings, Inc., owns 100% of the outstanding
common stock of Guitar Center, Inc. Guitar Center, Holdings Inc.
has no material asset or operations other than its ownership of
GCI. GCI is a private company and does not publicly disclose
detailed financial information.


H K FINE PROPERTIES: Cuevas Buying Baytown Property for $53K
------------------------------------------------------------
H.K. Fine Properties, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas to authorize the real property commonly
known as 705 Ward Street, Baytown, Texas to Sergio and Aurea Cuevas
for $53,000.

Objections, if any, must be filed within 21 days of the date the
Motion was served.

On Oct. 5, 2015, the Debtor's affiliate Supply Pro Sorbents, LLC,
received two loans from Texas Citizens.  The first loan was for
$675,000 and had a 7-year term.  The second loan was for $250,000
and had a 1-year term.  Both loans were secured by Supply Pro's
physical assets.  The second loan's maturity date was extended
several times.   

On Sept. 23, 2016, the Debtor pledged all its real property,
including the Property, to Texas Citizens with a deed of trust
dated Sept. 23, 2016.  At the time, Supply Pro was not in default
on either of its loans with Texas Citizens.  No consideration was
transferred to the Debtor and neither the Debtor nor Supply Pro
received any value from Texas Citizens in exchange for the Debtor's
pledge of its real property and deed of trust.  On Nov. 5, 2018,
Ecosorb acquired the Supply Pro loans from Texas Citizens.

The Buyers have expressed interest in purchasing Ward Street.
Their daughter lives next door.  The purchase price will be $53,000
and financed by the Debtor.  The down payment will be $2,000, the
$51,000 balance will be financed at 10% interest with a 15-year
amortization, and a balloon at the end of month 39.  The first
payment will be due ninety days after the closing.  The Debtor asks
the Court authorize its sale of the Property free and clear of all
liens.

Presently, the Property produces no income for the estate because
the house on the Property is uninhabitable.  Significant investment
would be required to make the home habitable.  The sale of the
Property allows the estate to receive an income stream from the
Property without having to invest any resources.  The Debtor has
not received any other offers.

                    About H.K. Fine Properties

H K Fine Properties' principal assets are located at 1210
Shotwell/1231 Hahlo, Houston, Texas, and 705 Ward Rd., Baytown,
Texas.  The Company is an affiliate of Supply Pro Sorbents, LLC and
Supply Pro, Inc., both of which sought bankruptcy protection on
Dec. 19, 2018 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case Nos. 18-20580 and 18-20581,
respectively).  Supply Pro offers safety and cleaning supplies
utilized in the cleanup of hazardous oil and chemical spills.

H K Fine Properties, LLC, based in Houston, TX, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-31828) on April 1, 2019.  In
the petition signed by Harmon K. Fine, president/manager, the
Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.  The Hon. Eduardo V. Rodriguez oversees the case.
Alan Sanford Gerger, Esq., at The Gerger Law Firm PLLC, serves as
bankruptcy counsel.


HELIOS AND MATHESON: Swaps Warrants for 12% Debentures Due 2020
---------------------------------------------------------------
Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. entered into separate exchange
agreements on April 30, 2019, with the holders of outstanding
Series F-2 Preferred Stock Purchase Warrants to purchase 60,240
shares of the Company's Series B Preferred Stock, par value $0.01
per share, which are convertible into 1,004,020,080 shares of the
Company's common stock, for the purpose of exchanging those
Warrants for 12% Debentures Due Nov. 1, 2020 in the aggregate
principal amount of $2,100,000.  As a result, the Warrants have
been cancelled.

Additionally, the Exchange Agreements amended the Securities
Purchase Agreements entered into by the Company on March 25, 2019
with the holders of the outstanding Warrants and described in the
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March
26, 2019.  As a result, the Purchase Agreements have been amended
to remove the requirement that the Company obtain stockholder
approval of an amendment of its certificate of incorporation to
effect a reverse stock split of the Company's common stock.

Debentures

On April 30, 2019, the Company issued the Debentures in an
aggregate principal amount of $2,100,000 in exchange for the
Warrants.  Commencing on July 1, 2019, the Debentures will bear
interest at a rate of 12% per annum, payable on Nov. 1, 2020.  The
Debentures are unsecured.  If stockholder approval of the Reverse
Split is obtained, the Company may, at its option, redeem the
Debentures in cash in an amount equal to the Optional Redemption
Amount, or at the Company's option, pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of
the Securities Act, through the exchange of Debentures for newly
issued Warrants exercisable into such number of shares of Preferred
Stock equal to the Optional Redemption Amount divided by $34.8606.
The Optional Redemption Amount is equal to 100% of the principle
amount of the Debentures, plus accrued but unpaid interest, if any,
plus liquidated damages, if any.  Unless earlier redeemed, the
Debentures will mature on
Nov. 1, 2020.

Events constituting events of default under the Debentures include
(i) any default in the payment of the principal amount of any
Debenture or other amount owing to a holder any Debenture, (ii) the
Company's failure to observe or perform in any material respect any
other covenant or agreement contained in the Debentures or in any
Transaction Document, which is not cured within certain cure
periods, (iii) any representation or warranty made in the Debenture
or the Exchange Agreement, or other statements or reports pursuant
thereto shall be untrue or incorrect in any material respect, (iv)
the Company or any Significant Subsidiary being subject to a
Bankruptcy Event (each, as defined in the Debenture), (v) the
Company's or any of its subsidiaries' default on any of its
obligations under any financial instrument or accommodations that
(a) involves an obligation greater than $500,000, and (b) results
in the related indebtedness becoming or being declared due and
payable prior to the date on which it would otherwise become due
and payable; (vi) the Company's being a party to any Change of
Control Transaction (as defined in the Debenture) or agreeing to
sell or dispose of all or in excess of 50% of its assets in one
transaction or a series of related transactions (whether or not
such sale would constitute a Change of Control Transaction) other
than the transfer by the Company to a wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Company of all of the Company's ownership interests in
MoviePass Inc., MoviePass Films, LLC, MoviePass Ventures LLC and
Moviefone related assets and the subsequent distribution of shares
of Spinco to the stockholders of the Company and holders of
convertible notes, warrants or other outstanding equity or
equity-linked instruments of the Company to the extent required by
such instruments; or (vii) any monetary judgment, writ or similar
final process entered or filed against the Company, any subsidiary
or any of their respective property or other assets for more than
$500,000, and such judgment, writ or similar final process shall
remain unvacated, unbonded or unstayed for a period of 45 calendar
days.

                  About Helios and Matheson

Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. -- http://www.hmny.com/-- is a
provider of information technology services and solutions, offering
a range of technology platforms focusing on big data, business
intelligence, and consumer-centric technology.  More recently, to
provide greater value to stockholders, the Company has sought to
expand its business primarily through acquisitions that leverage
its capabilities and expertise.  The Company is headquartered in
New York City, has an office in Miami Florida and has an office in
Bangalore India.

Helios and Matheson reported a net loss of $150.8 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of $7.38 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  The Company's amended balance
sheet at Sept. 30, 2018, showed $134.30 million in total assets,
$68.86 million in total liabilities, and $65.44 million in total
stockholders' equity.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Rosenberg
Rich Baker Berman, P.A., in Somerset, New Jersey, on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows
from operating activities.  This raises substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

                  2018 Form 10-K Filing Delay

Helios and Matheson had filed a Form 12b-25 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission notifying the delay in the filing of its Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018.  The Company
said it requires additional time to provide its independent
registered public accounting firm with the information and
documentation regarding its assessment of its internal control over
financial reporting to enable its independent registered public
accounting firm to provide the required attestation report.


HELIOS AND MATHESON: Will be Delisted from Nasdaq
-------------------------------------------------
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. has determined to remove from listing
the common stock of Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc., effective
at the opening of the trading session on May 13, 2019. Based on
review of information provided by the Company, Nasdaq Staff
determined that the Company no longer qualified for listing on the
Exchange pursuant to Listing Rule 5550(a)(2).  The Company was
notified of the Staff's determination on Dec. 19, 2018.  The
Company appealed the determination to a Hearing Panel.  Upon review
of the information provided by the Company, the Panel issued a
decision dated Feb. 11, 2019, denying the Company continued listing
and notified the Company that trading in the Companys securities
would be suspended on Feb. 13, 2019.  The Company did not request a
review of the Panel's decision by the Nasdaq Listing and Hearing
Review Council.  The Listing Council did not call the matter for
review.  The Panel's Determination to delist the Company became
final on March 28, 2019.

                   About Helios and Matheson

Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. -- http://www.hmny.com/-- is a
provider of information technology services and solutions, offering
a range of technology platforms focusing on big data, business
intelligence, and consumer-centric technology.  More recently, to
provide greater value to stockholders, the Company has sought to
expand its business primarily through acquisitions that leverage
its capabilities and expertise.  The Company is headquartered in
New York City, has an office in Miami Florida and has an office in
Bangalore India.

Helios and Matheson reported a net loss of $150.8 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of $7.38 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  The Company's amended balance
sheet at Sept. 30, 2018, showed $134.30 million in total assets,
$68.86 million in total liabilities, and $65.44 million in total
stockholders' equity.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Rosenberg
Rich Baker Berman, P.A., in Somerset, New Jersey, on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows
from operating activities.  This raises substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

                   2018 Form 10-K Filing Delay

Helios and Matheson had filed a Form 12b-25 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission notifying the delay in the filing of its Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018.  The Company
said it requires additional time to provide its independent
registered public accounting firm with the information and
documentation regarding its assessment of its internal control over
financial reporting to enable its independent registered public
accounting firm to provide the required attestation report.


HELIOS SOFTWARE: Moody's Alters Outlook on B3 CFR to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the ratings of Helios Software
Holdings, Inc., an operating subsidiary of parent company, ION
Corporate Solutions Finance Limited, affirming the B3 Corporate
Family Rating and the B3-PD Probability of Default Rating.
Concurrently, Moody's affirmed the B3 rating on the issuer's
proposed senior secured first lien credit facility as well as the
B3 ratings of co-borrower ION Corporate Solutions Finance S.a
r.l.'s proposed first lien bank debt. The outlook was revised from
negative to stable.

The outlook revision reflects the combined entity's improved credit
protection metrics as a result of a proposed $250 million reduction
in total pro forma borrowings and the elimination of a proposed
dividend distribution, with trailing pro forma adjusted Debt/EBITDA
falling by 0.8x as compared to the previously anticipated debt
structure.

Upon completion of this transaction, expected in early May 2019,
Wall Street Systems Inc., Allegro, Openlink Financial, LLC, and
Triple Point Technology, Inc., all of which are operating units
owned by holding company ION Investment Group, will be consolidated
into ION as a single entity.

Moody's expects the debt of the predecessor entities which will be
consolidated to form ION to be repaid and all existing ratings on
these issuers to be withdrawn.

Moody's affirmed the following ratings:

Issuer: Helios Software Holdings, Inc.:

  Corporate Family Rating - B3

  Probability of Default Rating - B3-PD

  Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility expiring 2024
  -- B3 (LGD3)

  Senior Secured Term Loan due 2023 -- B3 (LGD3)

  Senior Secured Term Loan due 2026 -- B3 (LGD3)

  Outlook revised from Negative to Stable

Issuer: ION Corporate Solutions Finance S.a r.l.

  (EUR-denominated) Senior Secured Term Loan due 2023
   -- B3 (LGD3)

  (EUR-denominated) Senior Secured Term Loan due 2026
   -- B3 (LGD3)

Outlook revised from Negative to Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Helios' B3 CFR reflects the combined company's high pro forma
trailing debt leverage of more than 6x (Moody's adjusted for
operating leases) as well as relatively limited scale as a niche
provider of software and services for treasury risk management,
foreign exchange processing, and energy and commodity trading risk
management (E/CTRM) applications. Debt leverage is over 7.0x when
expensing capitalized software costs. The company's credit profile
is also negatively impacted by recent weakness in business
performance as sales have contracted by approximately 2% over the
past year and Moody's believes that the software provider's organic
revenue growth prospects will be modest over the intermediate term
due to the maturity of its target markets. Additionally, possible
business disruptions related to the integration of disparate
operating units into one cohesive business entity as well as the
potential for incremental acquisitions and shareholder
distributions could constrain deleveraging efforts. However, these
risks are partially mitigated by ION's solid market position within
its niche serving over 2,200 of the world's largest corporations,
financial institutions, central banks, and energy and utility
companies. The company's credit quality is also supported by a
largely subscription based sales model that provides a degree of
top-line visibility given a significant proportion of recurring
revenue and minimal client attrition. These factors, coupled with
improving projected profitability metrics, should facilitate free
cash flow production which is expected to exceed 5% of total debt
over the coming year.

The company's adequate liquidity is supported by a pro forma cash
balance of approximately $40 million following the completion of
the transaction as well as Moody's expectation of free cash flow
generation exceeding 5% of debt over the next 12 months. The
company's liquidity is also bolstered by an undrawn $30 million
revolving credit facility, but the revolver is considered small in
relation to the company's projected interest expense. While the
term loans are not subject to financial covenants, the revolving
credit facility has a springing covenant based on a maximum net
leverage ratio which the company should be comfortably in
compliance with over the next 12-18 months.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that ION will
generate modest organic revenue growth over the next 12 to 18
months, but could be impacted by a degree of sales volatility
principally from professional services offerings. Concurrently, the
realization of anticipated cost synergies that would be the
principal driver of EBITDA growth and deleveraging is subject to
material execution risk, but should fuel a contraction in debt
leverage to below 6x over the next year.

The rating could be upgraded if the company realizes consistent
revenue growth and successfully implements planned cost
rationalization programs while adhering to a conservative financial
policy such that debt to EBITDA (Moody's adjusted) is expected to
be sustained below 6.0x.

The rating could be downgraded if ION were to experience a
weakening competitive position, sustained free cash flow deficits,
or the company maintains aggressive financial policies that prevent
meaningful deleveraging.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Software
Industry published in August 2018.

Helios and its parent company ION, both owned by ION Investment,
provide software and services for treasury risk management, foreign
exchange processing, and energy and commodity trading risk
management (E/CTRM) applications. Moody's expects the company's
revenues to approximate $670 million in 2019.


HI-CRUSH PARTNERS: Moody's Alters Outlook on B2 CFR to Negative
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Hi-Crush Partners LP  B2
Corporate Family Rating, B2-PD Probability of Default Rating and B3
rating on the company's existing senior unsecured notes.
Concurrently, Moody's downgraded Hi-Crush's Speculative Grade
Liquidity Rating to SGL-3 from SGL-2. The outlook changed to
negative from stable.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Hi-Crush Partners LP

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Downgraded to
  SGL-3 from SGL-2

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Hi-Crush Partners LP

  Outlook, Changed To Negative From Stable

Affirmations:

Issuer: Hi-Crush Partners LP

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B2-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B2

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed
  B3 (LGD4)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Hi-Crush's B2 CFR reflects its high leverage, limited scale,
earnings volatility and risks associated with the volatile oil &
gas industry. Since mid-2018, prices for frac sand have declined by
more than 20% due to overcapacity and the displacement of Northern
White Sand in certain basins by cheaper in-basin sand. Despite
recent improvement in the price of oil, mine closures, and
production cuts, Moody's does not expect any significant price
recovery as many miners have committed to higher volumes at lower
prices.

The negative outlook reflects Moody's expectations that industry
weakness will persist and Hi-Crush's credit metrics will
deteriorate further. For 2019, Moody's projects revenues and
operating profits to decline by 4% and 64%, respectively, total
debt-to-EBITDA to increase to 4.4x from 2.3x and EBIT-to-Interest
expense to decline to 1.2x from 5.3x (all ratios and calculations
inclusive of Moody's standard adjustments).

In addition, the SGL-3 rating reflects the company's adequate
liquidity profile, a deterioration due to increased volatility of
end markets. For 2019, Moody's projects the company to rely on its
cash on hand to supplement cash flows, fund its operations, service
its debt, and deploy growth capital. Liquidity gains support from
cash on hand of $61.5 million (as of Feb. 14, 2019) and a lack of
near-term debt maturities as its $200 million ABL credit facility
expires in 2023 and its $450 million senior notes mature in 2026.
The principal financial covenant under the ABL credit facility is a
springing fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0x, tested only when
excess availability is less than (1) the greater of $12.5 million,
or (2) 12.5% of the lesser of the borrowing base or commitment.
Moody's expects Hi-Crush will have good cushion in its financial
covenants over the next 12-18 months. The SGL-3 rating assumes that
the company will not utilize the revolver to meet internal uses of
cash, but rather use cash on hand.

Moody's indicated that the ratings could be stabilized if adjusted
debt-to-book capitalization is maintained under 50%, adjusted
EBIT-to-interest is sustained above 2.0x, and adjusted operating
margin is above 20%. A stable outlook would also require robust
liquidity, free cash flow generation, and healthy oil and natural
gas end markets.

The ratings could be downgraded if adjusted EBIT-to-interest
declined below 1.0x, adjusted operating margin deteriorates to
below 10% for an extended period of time, or adjusted debt-to-book
capitalization is above 50%. In addition, a ratings downgrade could
result from a deterioration in liquidity or weakened financial
flexibility, possibly due to aggressive growth, large debt-funded
acquisitions or shareholder friendly activities.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Building
Materials Industry published in January 2017.

Based in Houston, Texas, Hi-Crush Partners LP is an integrated
producer, transporter, marketer and distributor of high-quality
monocrystalline sand, which is a specialized mineral used as a
proppant to recover hydrocarbons from oil and natural gas wells.
Hi-Crush owns, operates and develops sand reserves and related
excavation, processing and distribution facilities. At year-end
2018, the company held approximately 412 million tons of proven
recoverable reserves of frac sand meeting API specifications, had
13.4 million tons of annual processing capacity, owned or leased
4,986 railcars and owned 12 destination terminals (two of which are
currently idled). For the 12 months ended December 31, 2018, the
company generated $843 million in revenues and $187 million in
operating profits (inclusive of Moody's Adjustment).


IDEANOMICS INC: Swings to $19.9 Million Net Income in Q1
--------------------------------------------------------
Ideanomics, Inc. has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting net income
of $19.90 million on $26.94 million of total revenue for the three
months ended March 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $3.81
million on $185.93 million of total revenue for the three months
ended March 31, 2018.

As of March 31, 2019, the Company had $146.22 million in total
assets, $72.26 million in total liabilities, $1.26 million in
convertible redeemable preferred stock, and $72.69 million in total
equity.

As of March 31, 2019, the Company had cash of approximately $2.0
million.  Approximately $1.5 million was held in its Hong Kong, US
and Singapore entities and $0.5 million was held in its PRC
entities.

Cash used in operating activities increased by $1.4 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2019 compared to the same period in
2018, primarily due to (1) an increase in operating results from
net loss $3.8 million in the first quarter of 2018 to net income
$19.9 million in the first quarter of 2019, (2) total non-cash
adjustments increase (decrease) to net income (loss) was $(25.1)
million and $0.15 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019
and 2018, respectively; and (3) total changes in operating assets
and liabilities resulted in an increase of $0.4 million and of $0.3
million in cash used in operations activities for the three months
ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Cash used in investing activities increased by $0.8 million,
primarily used for the additional costs incurred for Fintech
Village, the related costs (approximately $0.6 million) and an
increase of approximately $0.2 million related to acquisitions of
long term investments.

The Company received $2.1 million from the issuance of convertible
notes and $2.5 million in proceeds in a private placement from the
issuance of restricted shares for the three months ended March 31,
2019, to certain investors, including officers, directors and other
affiliates.  While in the same period in 2018, the Company received
$0.5 million.

Ideanomics said, "Currently, our primary source of liquidity is
cash on hand and we have relied on debt and equity financings to
fund our operations to date.  We believe that our cash balance and
our expected cash flow will be sufficient to meet all of our
financial obligations for the twelve months from the date of this
report... [I]n March 2019, we received 1,250,000 GTB tokens under
asset purchase agreement and 7,083,333 GTB tokens under our Digital
Asset Management Services Agreement with GTD.

"In the future, it is possible that we will need additional capital
to fund our operations and growth initiatives, which we expect we
would raise through a combination of equity offerings, debt
financings, related party or third-party funding.  We may also
convert all or a portion of our GTB tokens to fiat currency or U.S.
Dollars as needed.

"The fact that we have incurred significant continuing losses and
could raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a
going concern.  The unaudited consolidated financial statements
included in this report have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern and, accordingly, do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty."

The Company's independent registered public accounting firm's
report of the financial statements for year ended December 31,
2018, contained an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company's report on Form 10-Q is available from the SEC's
website at https://is.gd/xj4Rek.

                        About Ideanomics

Ideanomics, formerly known as Seven Stars Cloud Group, Inc., is a
global fintech advisory and Platform-as-a-Service company.
Ideanomics combines deal origination and enablement with the
application of blockchain and artificial intelligence technologies
as part of the next-generation of financial services.  The company
is headquartered in New York, NY, and has offices in Beijing,
China.  It also has a planned global center for Technology and
Innovation in West Hartford, CT, named Fintech Village.

Ideanomics reported a net loss of $28.42 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $10.86 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had
$94.23 million in total assets, $49.76 million in total
liabilities, $1.26 million in convertible preferred stock, and
$43.21 million in total equity.

B F Borgers CPA PC, in Lakewood, Colorado, the Company's auditor
since 2018, issued a "going concern" opinion in its report dated
April 1, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company incurred
recurring losses from operations, has net current liabilities and
an accumulated deficit that raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.


INTERCONTINENTAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING: S&P Cuts Bond Rating to 'BB-'
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its rating on California Statewide
Communities Development Authority's series 2011I-1 multifamily
housing revenue bonds, issued for Intercontinental Affordable
Housing Inc.'s (IAHI) Casa Grande apartments project, three notches
to 'BB-' from 'BBB-'. The outlook is negative.

The rating action reflects S&P's opinion of the project's volatile
financial performance, evidenced by a debt service coverage ratio
that decreased significantly to 1.02x in fiscal 2018 from 1.11x in
fiscal 2016 to levels the rating service considers more
commensurate with a 'BB-' rating. In S&P's opinion, loss coverage
is now highly vulnerable due to a significant increase in the
loan-to-value ratio.

The negative outlook reflects S&P's view that it could lower the
rating further if fiscal 2019 operations were to generate debt
service coverage below 1x and loss coverage were to remain highly
vulnerable.

"We could lower the rating further within the one-year outlook
period if fiscal 2019 operations were to generate debt service
coverage below 1x and loss coverage were to remain highly
vulnerable," said S&P credit analyst Emily Avila. "We, however,
could revise the outlook to stable if debt service coverage were to
stabilize at levels above 1x."


K&D INDUSTRIAL: Selling Operations and Business Assets for $1.2M
----------------------------------------------------------------
K&D Industrial Services Holding Co., Inc., and affiliates ask the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to
authorize the bidding procedures in connection with the sale of
certain of their ongoing operations and business assets to Job Site
Services, Inc. for $1.22 million, subject to any closing
adjustments and pro-rations on the closing date, subject to
overbid.

The principal assets of the Debtors estate include business
equipment, personal property, permits, warranties, purchased
intellectual property, ongoing operations and contracts, work in
progress, and unpaid accounts receivables.  Prior to the Petition
Date and thereafter, the Debtors are in the business of environment
waste hauling and industrial cleaning.

The Debtors have received an Asset Purchase Agreement from Job
Site, for the purchase of certain of the Debtors ongoing operations
and business assets.  

Job Site proposes to purchase these assets from the Debtors:

     (a) all vehicles and equipment listed on Exhibit A of the Job
Site Purchase Agreement, including all spare parts, hoses, pumps,
tools and accessories related thereto ("Equipment"”);

     (b) office equipment and furniture located in and on that
certain real property owned by L&P Industries LLC at 1250 Lincoln
Road, Allegan, Michigan ("Allegan Personal Property");

     (c) all office equipment and furniture located in and on that
leased real property located at 2962 E Venture Dr., Midland,
Michigan ("Midland Personal Property");

     (d) all licenses and permits, and other approvals issued by
any state, federal or local authority relating to the use,
maintenance or operation of the Purchased Assets, if any, and only
to the extent that they may be transferred or assigned ("Acquired
Permits");

     (e) all warranties or guaranties, if any, applicable to the
Purchased Assets, to the extent such warranties or guaranties are
assignable in connection with the Purchased Assets ("Warranties");


     (f) all patents, patent applications, patent rights,
trademarks, trademark applications, trade names, product names,
service marks, copyrights, copyright applications domain name
registrations, software, know-how and other intellectual property
related to the Purchased Assets ("Purchased Intellectual
Property"); and

     (g) the contracts and leases listed on Exhibit B of the Job
Site Purchase Agreement ("Contracts") provided, however, that the
Purchaser will have the right to exclude any Contract from Exhibit
B by giving notice to Seller and the counterparty to such contract
three business days prior to the Closing.

The Purchase Price for the Purchased Assets in the Job Site
Purchase Agreement is $1.22 million, subject to any closing
adjustments and pro-rations on the closing date.  Pursuant to the
Closing Conditions, the Job Site Purchase Agreement is conditioned
upon either (i) the Bankruptcy Court’s approval of a Real Estate
Purchase Agreement for the sale of the Debtors' property located at
1250 Lincoln Road, Allegan Michigan to the Purchaser, or (ii) the
Purchaser and L&P Industries, LLC will have entered into a lease
for the Allegan Property on terms and conditions acceptable to
Purchaser including a term of not less than 18 months.

The Debtors intend for the Job Site Purchase Agreement to serve as
the Stalking Horse Bid throughout the proposed sale process.  If
Job Site is the successful bidder, the Debtors intend to request
Court approval at the Sale Hearing of a lease between L&P
Industries and Job Site for the Allegan Property as conditioned in
the Job Site Purchase Agreement and pending the sale of the Allegan
Property.  

The Debtors believe and assert that the proposed procedures for the
asset sale, free of all liens, claims and interests, should be
approved because a going-concern sale will maximize the value and
recovery for the Debtors estates.  

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: No later than 5:00 p.m. (ET) on the day that
is two Business Days prior to the Auction Date

     b. Initial Bid: The bid will equal or exceed the Purchase
Price in the Job Site Purchase Agreement plus the Break-Up Fee of
50,000 plus $50,000.

     c. Deposit: $125,000

     d. Auction: The Auction will commence at 10:00 a.m. on May 10,
2019 or 21 business days after the entry of the Bidding Procedures
Order, whichever date is later, at the offices of the Debtors'
counsel, Lynn M. Brimer, Strobl Sharp PLLC, 300 E.
Long Lake Rd., Suite 200, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304.

     e. Bid Increments: $25,000

The Debtors have contracts that are necessary to the successful
operation of their businesses.  Conversely, they may have contracts
associated with their Businesses or the Purchased Assets that may
interfere with the sale or are deemed detrimental to their estates,
and upon sale of the Purchased Assets will no longer be beneficial
to Debtors.  To facilitate the sale of the Purchased Assets as
outlined in the Sale Motion, they authority to assume and assign
certain executory contracts and unexpired leases to the Successful
Bidder to the extent required by the Success Bid.

Within three business days of the entry of the Bid Procedures
Order, the Debtors will provide all Qualified Bidders with a list
and a copy of all contracts and leases related to the Purchased
Assets, along with the Cure Schedule.  Three business days after
the entry of the Bidding Procedures Order, the Debtors will serve
on the counterparties to the contracts on the Contract Lists the
Assumption and Assignment Notice.  The counterparties to the
Assumed Contracts and Assumed Leases will file any objections to
the assumption and assignment of the Assumed Contracts and Assumed
Leases or the Pre-Petition Cure Amount at least three business days
prior to the Auction.

The Debtors will make cure payments within 30 days after the date
of the closing of the sale of the Purchased Assets and any letters
of credit associated with any assumed contract or assumed lease
will be replaced by a new letter of credit provided by the
Successful Bidder.

Subject to Bankruptcy Court approval, the Debtors propose to
establish the following timetable:

         Proposed Date                  Proposed Event

    Prior to April 19, 2019       Entry of Bid Procedures Order
    April 27 and May 4, 2019            Publish Notice
    April 27, 2019                    Serve Sale Notice
    April 27, 2019                 Serve Assumption Notice

    May 6, 2019             Deadline for Objections to Assumptions

    May 7, 2019                  Deadline for Qualified Bids
    May 10, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.             Auction
    May 14, 2019               Submission of Proposed Sale Order
    May 23, 2019                 Deadline for Objections to Sale
    May 24, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.           Sale Hearing

The Debtors ask the Court to sell the Assets free and clear of all
liens, claims, interests and encumbrances, with such Liens
attaching to proceeds.

Due to the need to transition the Purchased Assets as quickly as
possible in order to maintain the Debtors' goodwill, the Debtors
assert that cause exists to waive the requirements of Fed. R.
Bankr. P. 6004(g) and 6006(d), and they ask that the Order
approving the sale (as well as the assumption and assignment of the
Assumed Contracts and Assumed Leases) provide that it will be
effective immediately and that the 10-day stay will not apply to
the sale transaction (and the assumption and assignment of the
Assumed Contract and Assumed Leases).

A copy of the Bidding Procedures and APA attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/k&D_Industrial_59_Sales.pdf

                      About K&D Industrial

Since 1974, K&D Industrial Services -- http://www.kdigroup.com/--
has provided industrial and environmental services to customers in
virtually every industry.  Founded by Ken Liabenow and Dennis
Springer, K&D focuses on cleaning, removing and treating hazardous
and non-hazardous materials originating from process residual or
industrial waste.  Key business areas include industrial cleaning
services, environmental remediation services, hazardous and
non-hazardous transportation services, and treatment services.  K&D
services the entire Midwest through its six office locations in
Michigan, Ohio and Kentucky.

K&D Industrial Services Holding Co., Inc. and its affiliates sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.
Mich. Case No. 19-43823) on March 15, 2019.  At the time of the
filing, K&D Industrial disclosed zero assets and $3,369,495 in
liabilities.  K&D Industries, one of K&D Industrial affiliates,
disclosed $937,714 in assets and $8,736,715 in liabilities.  The
cases are assigned to Judge Phillip J. Shefferly.  Strobl Sharp
PLLC is the Debtors' counsel.


KBC ENTERPRISE: Unsecureds to Get $1,500 Per Quarter for 5 Years
----------------------------------------------------------------
KBC Enterprise LLC filed a Chapter 11 Plan and accompanying
Disclosure Statement proposing that holders of Allowed General
Unsecured Claims, classified in Class 10, will receive pro rata
quarterly distributions equal to its proportionate share of the
entire class, paid quarterly, over the five-year Plan Term, at a
total collectively of $1,500 per quarter for 20 quarters or five
years years, without interest.

The Reorganized Debtor will issue the quarterly distribution checks
each quarter on the first of the months of January, April, July and
October, with the first payments being made on October 1, 2019.

Class 11 consists of those Persons holding the prepetition equity
membership Interests in the Debtor, being Carlos "Doc" Carpenter
holding 50% interest and Karen Carpenter holding 50% interest.
Carlos "Doc" Carpenter and Karen Carpenter will continue to hold
their interests in the Reorganized Debtor; provided, however, that
the Exit Loan contains an option to convert the loan balance at the
end of year one to a 19% equity interest, at the discretion of the
Exit Lender.  There will be no dividends, no member distributions,
or any other payments to or on account of the Equity Membership
Interests (except for the regular salary (guaranteed payment) to
Doc Carpenter in the ordinary course) unless and until all other
Allowed Claims have been paid in full over the Plan Term.

The Reorganized Debtor will fund the Plan payments to Creditors in
the ordinary course and according to the Plan treatment terms from
post-Confirmation net profits, as well as from the Exit Loan.
Under the Plan, Confirmation of the Plan shall be deemed approval
of the Exit Loan in accordance with such written documentation as
is necessary and standard, subject to ongoing Court oversight only
in the event the Exit Loan terms change at or prior to Closing
following Confirmation.  As of the Effective Date, and as long as
the Reorganized Debtor continues operation, the Reorganized Debtor
shall have the right to collect and use all of its revenues for
operations in accordance with the Plan repayment terms.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated April 18, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/yy7yycj8 from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                  About KBC Enterprise

KBC Enterprise LLC is a frozen dessert supplier in London,
Kentucky. KBC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Case No. 18-61316) on Oct. 22, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Carlos Carpenter, president, KBC estimated
assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $1 million
to $10 million. KBC tapped DelCotto Law Group PLLC as its legal
counsel.


KENDALL FROZEN: Asks Court to Approve Employment of CMR
-------------------------------------------------------
Kendall Frozen Fruits, Inc., filed anew an application to approve
the employment of Channel Marketing Resources, Inc.

In its application, the Debtor asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of California to approve the employment of its
financial advisor for the period Nov. 5, 2018 to Feb. 13, 2019.

The request, if granted by the court, would enable Channel to file
a fee application to seek reimbursement for the services it
provided to the Debtor during that period.

Channel charges the Debtor for services rendered at its current
hourly rate, which reflects a 25% reduction from ordinary long-term
engagement hourly rate of $200 (as a voluntary effort to help
return Debtor to profitability) and 40% discount from standard
hourly rate.

The Debtor filed its first application on Dec. 4 last year, which
was denied by the court following the appointment of Howard
Grobstein as Chapter 11 trustee.  The court ruled that the trustee
is the appropriate party to make decisions regarding employment of
professionals.  Mr. Grobstein plans to retain Channel as a
bankruptcy professional but believes that he is not the appropriate
party to seek employment of the firm for any time period prior to
his appointment, according to court filings.

                  About Kendall Frozen Fruits

Newport Beach, California-based Kendall Frozen Fruits, Inc. --
https://www.kendallfruit.com/ -- is an industrial food supplier
specializing in the sale and marketing of fruit and vegetable
products since 1939. It offers frozen fruits, dried fruits, juice
concentrates, purees, freeze dried fruit, fruit powders, vegetable
products, chocolate covered dried fruit, and yogurt covered dried
fruit.

Kendall Frozen Fruits sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-14052) on Nov. 5,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of $1
million to $10 million and liabilities of the same range.  Judge
Scott C. Clarkson oversees the case.  

SulmeyerKupetz, A Professional Corporation, is the Debtor's
counsel.

Howard Grobstein was appointed as the Debtor's Chapter 11 trustee
on Feb. 14, 2019.  The trustee hired Marshack Hays LLP as his legal
counsel.


KNOLL'S INC: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Knoll's, Inc.
        1604 Grandview Drive East
        Garden City, KS 67846

Business Description: Knoll's, Inc., is a privately held
                      company that operates in the crop
                      farming industry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 3, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Kansas (Wichita)

Case No.: 19-10795

Judge: Hon. Robert E. Nugent

Debtor's Counsel: David P. Eron, Esq.
                  ERON LAW, P.A.
                  229 E. William, Suite 100
                  Wichita, KS 67202
                  Tel: 316-262-5500
                  Fax: 316-262-5559
                  E-mail: david@eronlaw.net

Total Assets: $1,378,823

Total Liabilities: $6,504,194

The petition was signed by Robert Knoll, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's four unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/ksb19-10795.pdf


KODIAK GAS: Moody's Withdraws B3 CFR on Cancelled Bond Offering
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service withdrew all ratings for Kodiak Gas
Services, LLC.

Withdrawals:

Issuer: Kodiak Gas Services, LLC

  Probability of Default Rating, Withdrawn, previously
  rated B3-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Withdrawn, previously
  rated B3

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Withdrawn,
  previously rated Caa2 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Kodiak Gas Services, LLC

  Outlook, Changed To Rating Withdrawn From Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The withdrawal of these ratings follows the company's withdrawn
bond offering.

Kodiak, headquartered in Houston, Texas, is a privately-owned
provider of contract compression and related services for the oil
and gas industry in the United States.


KODRENYC LLC: Plan Outline Evidentiary Hearing Set for June 21
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Karen S. Jenneman is set to hold an evidentiary
hearing June 21, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. to consider and rule on
Kodrenyc LLC's disclosure statement.

Objections to the proposed disclosure statement may be filed with
the Court at any time before or at the hearing.

                      About Kodrenyc

Kodrenyc, LLC, is a single asset real estate debtor, whose
principal assets are located at 17800 State Road 9 Miami, FL
33612.

Kodrenyc, LLC sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case
No. 19-00996) on Feb. 18, 2019.  The petition was signed by Jeffrey
Vasilas, manager of 17800 Gardens D, LLC, the manager/member of
AQFC LLC, manager/member of Kobrenyc, LLC.  The Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities in the range of  $1 million to $10 million.

The Debtor tapped Scott R. Shuker, Esq., at Latham, Shuker, Eden &
Beaudine, LLP, as counsel.


KRONOS WORLDWIDE: Fitch Affirms 'B+' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings of
Kronos Worldwide Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Kronos
International, Inc. at 'B+'. The Rating Outlook is Stable.

Kronos' ratings reflect its low leverage, low capex requirements
and conservative financial strategy. The company's leverage to the
TiO2 industry is a credit concern, but Fitch expects that a more
stabilized TiO2 market should lead to generally positive FCF
post-dividend and maintenance of robust liquidity over the ratings
horizon. In the event of a more volatile pricing environment, the
company has the ability to cut its dividend, which it has done in
prior periods. Additionally, current net debt to EBITDA of 0.2x
illustrates the company's considerable financial flexibility to
endure extended periods of stress.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Expected Pricing Discipline: Globally, the TiO2 market is
concentrated among a handful of top producers that Fitch believes
are highly motivated to demonstrate more disciplined pricing
behavior than in years past. Pro forma the Tronox/Cristal merger,
Fitch estimates the top five global producers account for around
60% of total capacity. Three of the top five, Venator,
Tronx/Cristal and Kronos, generate all or most of their earnings
from TiO2. Chemours, the largest producer in the world, has
publicly stated its intention to help stabilize TiO2 prices by
better matching its production volumes with global demand.

Typical year-end destocking and slowing growth in Europe and Asia
resulted in reduced pricing and demand for Kronos' products in a
period of rising feedstock costs. This trend continued into the
first quarter of 2019, and management has guided to a 2019 outlook
of lower prices and raw material headwinds. Nonetheless, Fitch
believes that pricing and margins will be less impacted than in
down years given the industry push towards a less volatile pricing
environment and more stable earnings. Fitch's expectations for
pricing to stabilize in Q2 and Q3 of 2019 on seasonally stronger
demand and lower supply due to production adjustments by industry
participants should result in EBITDA margins remaining in the
low-mid teens throughout the forecasted period compared to a
similar environment in 2015 and 2016 that saw EBITDA margins of
4.7% and 8.5%.

Rising Feedstock Costs: Prices for both sulfate and chloride TiO2
feedstock increased in the back half of 2018, and Fitch expects
this to continue into 2019 before stabilizing by 2020. Fitch
projects Kronos' EBITDA margins (22.3% at year-end 2018) will
normalize around the mid-teens by the end of the forecast horizon
due to these rising raw material costs that Fitch believes will
only be partially passed on. The recent consolidation among TiO2
producers should strengthen their bargaining power in price
negotiations with feedstock miners. Kronos purchases its
chloride-grade feedstock on the open market but is able to offset
some of its third-party exposure through its ilmenite mines in
Norway, which supply nearly all of its European sulfate needs.
Fitch estimates that Kronos is exposed to third-party feedstock
suppliers for at least 75% of its feedstock requirements.

Modest Debt Load: Fitch views Kronos' current debt load as modest
when compared against Fitch's view of a normalized operating EBITDA
for the company. Leverage is forecasted to remain at or below 2.0x
through the forecasted period, absent any acquisition activity or a
return to cyclicality.

Additionally, the company's upcoming maturity payments are very
light, averaging roughly $1 million per year over the next four
years. Fitch expects Kronos will be able to favorably refinance its
secured notes prior to its maturity date in 2025.

Lack of Diversification: Kronos is a pure play pigment producer
that has no other business segments to act as a buffer in periods
of volatility in the TiO2 industry. Fitch believes this exposure
adds cash flow risk to the company's credit profile as its
financial results are highly dependent on the health of the pigment
market. Kronos believes it has leading market positions in both
Europe and North America, but Fitch views the company as having
limited ability to impact global market dynamics. Despite
management's indication that it is the largest TiO2 producer in
Europe, Fitch estimates the company's EBITDA generation at its
European plants was severely limited during the previous downturn
in TiO2 prices.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Kronos' ratings reflect its relatively small size and lack of
diversification compared to peers in the TiO2 space while
acknowledging its low leverage and projected more stabilized cash
flow profile stemming from the expected pricing discipline within
the TiO2 industry. Compared to industry leaders The Chemours Co.
and Tronox Ltd. (pro forma the Critsal acquisition), Kronos has
limited ability to influence TiO2 supply dynamics and as a pure
play pigment producer has no other business segments to act as a
buffer if periods of significant volatility in the TiO2 industry
reappear. However, Kronos' debt load is modest, and Fitch projects
the company's gross leverage to stay around or below 2.0x, which
should help offset its lack of diversification. Additionally,
Kronos is expected to generate neutral to positive FCF
post-dividend and maintain robust liquidity in a more disciplined
pricing environment.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  - TiO2 prices compress slightly year/year in 2019 and raw
    material pressure compresses 2019 EBITDA margins. Thereafter,
    prices increase in the low-single digits and EBITDA margins
    normalize around 13%-14%;

  - Volumes relatively flat in 2019 and rise in the low-single
    digits thereafter;

  - Capital expenditures and dividend payments in line with   
    public guidance;

  - Annual dividends of $83 million

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

   - Increase in size, scale or diversification and total debt
     to EBITDA sustained below 3.0x to 3.5x or total adjusted
     debt to operating EBITDAR sustained below 3.5x;

   - Demonstrated commitment to maintenance of robust financial
     flexibility.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  - Structural deterioration in the TiO2 market leading to
    expectations of negative FCF generation, weakened EBITDA
margins
    and reduced financial flexibility;

  - Material debt-funded dividend payments or acquisition
activity;

  - Total debt to EBITDA sustained above 4.0x or total adjusted
    debt to operating EBITDAR sustained above 4.5x.

LIQUIDITY

Robust Liquidity: Fitch projects Kronos will maintain a robust
liquidity profile over the ratings horizon. The recovery and
expectated reduced volatility in TiO2 paired with minimal CapEx
requirements and manageable dividend payment should lead to the
company generating slightly positive FCF post-dividend through
2022. Absent acquisitions or any special dividend activity, Fitch
projects Kronos' liquidity position will stay in excess of $550
million through the next several years as its readily available
cash balances remain relatively unchanged and its two revolving
credit facilities remain undrawn.

The company has no notable upcoming maturities until its secured
note comes due in 2025.

Recovery Analysis: Fitch used a going concern EBITDA of $145
million to reflect what it would view as a mid-cycle amount in a
post-bankruptcy scenario, which would likely be around 2014/2016
levels. The 5.0x multiple acknowledges the commoditized nature of
Kronos' TiO2 products as well as its lack of diversification.
Tronox acquired Cristal for nearly $1.7 billion plus common shares
equating to 24% ownership of Tronox (market cap of around $2.3
billion at the time). Fitch estimates Cristal generates around $400
million of EBITDA on a mid-cycle basis and has 840,000 tonnes of
capacity compared to Kronos' 565,000 tonnes of capacity.

While Fitch drew $215 million under Kronos' two revolvers, the $125
million North American facility is an ABL that would likely not
have the full amount available in a distressed environment. The
EUR90 million European revolver also has very restrictive financial
covenants that have effectively prohibited the company from drawing
on the revolver at all and would almost certainly limit
availability in a distressed scenario.

Under this scenario, Kronos' revolvers recover 100% for an RR1
while its secured note recovers 85% for an RR2.

Fitch used $110 and $490 million as the converted USD amount of
Kronos' EUR ABL and notes for these calculations. Fitch believes
this amount generally represents the average amount outstanding
when converted to USD.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Kronos Worldwide, Inc.

  -- Long-Term IDR at 'B+';

  -- ABL revolver at 'BB+'/'RR1'

Kronos International, Inc.

  -- Long-Term IDR at 'B+';

  -- Senior secured revolving credit facility at 'BB+'/'RR1';

  -- Senior secured notes at 'BB'/'RR2'

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


LAKE BRANCH: Farm Credit Objects to Plan, Disclosures
-----------------------------------------------------
Farm Credit of Florida, ACA, in its sole capacity and as
agent/nominee for Florida Federal Land Bank Association, FLCA,
objects to the Joint Disclosure Statement and Joint Plan of
Reorganization filed by Lake Branch Dairy, Inc.

Farm Credit objects to the Disclosure Statement in that:

   (a) it omits any information regarding the leases and executory
contracts which are being assumed under Article VI of the Plan;

   (b) it fails to include an updated cattle inventory;

   (c) the 5 Year Pro Forma fails to identify the assumptions used
to support its revenue projections;

   (d) the 5 Year Pro Forma continues to include dairy cow sales in
its calculation of income despite Lake Branch Dairy’s agreement
with Farm Credit to continue to maintain a cull account to
preserve, protect and use any cattle sales proceeds for the
specific purchase of replacement cattle, until such time as Farm
Credit’s secured claim is paid in full;

   (e) it improperly, and without the consent of Farm Credit,
proposes to use the net sale proceeds from orange crops owned by a
non-debtor entity and on which Farm Credit has a first priority
security interest, to fund the Plan and specifically the dairy
operations;

   (f) it fails to indicate what assumptions were used to determine
the value of the Debtors' assets as of the confirmation date and
how such value was determined.

Farm Credit objects to confirmation of the Plan on the following
bases:

   (a) the Plan proposes a de facto substantive consolidation of
the Debtors by combining the Debtors' cash flow and creditor
treatment;

   (b) the Plan fails to provide for the payment of interest to the
unsecured creditors on account of their claims;

   (c) the Plan is not feasible as the Debtors' current cash flow
will not support maintenance of the dairy operations, debt service,
taxes, and insurance;

   (d) the Plan is not feasible in that it is likely to be followed
by the need for further reorganization and/or liquidation;

   (e) absent the consent of Farm Credit, the Plan cannot be
confirmed over Farm Credit's objection as there is no impaired
class which likely will vote to accept the Plan.

Attorney for Farm Credit of Florida, ACA:

     Christine L. Myatt, Esq.
     NEXSEN PRUET, PLLC
     701 Green Valley Road, Suite 100
     Post Office Box 3463
     Greensboro, NC 27402
     Tel: (336) 373-1600
     Email: cmyatt@nexsenpruet.com

Local Counsel for Farm Credit of Florida, ACA:

     Robert C. Schermer
     Greene Hamrick Quinlan & Schermer, P.A.
     601 12th Street West
     Bradenton, Florida 34205
     Tel: (941) 747-1871
     Fax: (941) 747-2991
     Email: rschermer@manateelegal.com

                   About Lake Branch Dairy, Inc.

Lake Branch Dairy, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D.
Fla. Case No. 18-05951), on July 19, 2018.  The Petition was signed
by Roger L. Nickerson, president. The Debtor is represented by
Buddy D. Ford, Esq. of Buddy D. Ford, P.A.  At the time of filing,
the Debtor had $3,331,161 in total assets and $7,906,868 in total
liabilities.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of Lake Branch Dairy, Inc., as of Aug. 16.


LAKE BRANCH: MetLife Objects to Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------
The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company objects to the Joint
Disclosure Statement and the Joint Plan of Reorganization filed by
Lake Branch Dairy, Inc., Lake Branch II, LLP and Roger & Merle
Nickerson Farms, LLP.

MetLife points out that Exhibit A to the Disclosure Statement
lists, among other things, fair market values and liquidation
values for the Debtors' assets.  MetLife further points out that
Exhibit A  provides that "for non-cash items, the Liquidation Value
is 60% of the total value". According to MetLife, notwithstanding
this singular, unsupported statement as to the calculation of the
value of the Debtors' assets, the Disclosure Statement completely
fails to provide any information substantiating the values (e.g.,
the basis, source, methodology, assumptions, etc.).

MetLife complains that the Debtors' disclosures with respect to
confirmation are woefully inadequate and do not provide reliable
evidence that the Plan is feasible. MetLife asserts, it is
impossible for any creditor to determine whether the Debtors' Plan
is feasible because the Debtors have not provided any kind of
historic budget analysis comparing pre and post-confirmation
revenue with expenses.

MetLife objects to the Plan as it is not feasible and the Debtors
have failed to demonstrate that the Plan is not likely to be
followed by the liquidation of the Debtors.

MetLife objects to the Plan as it violates 11 U.S.C. Section
1129(a)(7)(A)(ii) in that it does not satisfy the "best interests"
test by failing to establish that the value of MetLife's recovery
is at least equal to the distribution which MetLife would receive
if the assets of the Debtors were liquidated under Chapter 7 of the
Bankruptcy Code by a Chapter 7 Trustee.

MetLife objects to Article VII of the Plan as it provides that
"current equity will retain ownership in the Debtor
post-confirmation" even though the Plan does not provide for
payment in full of the unsecured claims.

MetLife objects to confirmation of the Debtors' Plan as it has not
been proposed in good faith.

Attorneys for Metropolitan Life Insurance Company:

     Angela N. Grewal, Esq.
     ADAMS AND REESE LLP
     501 Riverside Avenue, Suite 601
     Jacksonville, FL 32202
     Phone: (904) 355-1700
     Email: angela.grewal@arlaw.com

        -- and --

     Ron C. Bingham, II, Esq.
     ADAMS AND REESE LLP
     Monarch Tower, Suite 1600
     3424 Peachtree Rd. NE
     Atlanta, GA 30326
     Tel: (470) 427-3701
     Email: ron.bingham@arlaw.com

                   About Lake Branch Dairy, Inc.

Lake Branch Dairy, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D.
Fla. Case No. 18-05951), on July 19, 2018.  The Petition was signed
by Roger L. Nickerson, president. The Debtor is represented by
Buddy D. Ford, Esq. of Buddy D. Ford, P.A.  At the time of filing,
the Debtor had $3,331,161 in total assets and $7,906,868 in total
liabilities.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of Lake Branch Dairy, Inc., as of Aug. 16.


LAREDO HOUSING: S&P Puts CCC+ Rev. Bond Rating on Watch Negative
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed its 'CCC+' rating on Laredo Housing
Finance Corp., Texas' series 1994 single-family mortgage revenue
bonds on CreditWatch with negative implications.

"The CreditWatch placement reflects our view of the lack of
sufficient information to complete our review on the bonds," said
S&P credit analyst Jose Cruz.

The series 1994 bonds' asset-to-liability parity ratio is
approximately 71.84% as of April 1, 2019. Due to the bonds'
distressed position and because the rating subject to S&P's
"Criteria For Assigning 'CCC+', 'CCC', 'CCC-', and 'CC' Ratings,"
it is essential to determine the likelihood of default on the bonds
to appropriately determine the ratings as set forth in the
criteria, according to the rating agency. S&P said it has requested
and failed to receive from the trustee information regarding prior
and future debt service payments, and debt service schedule to
determine the appropriate default scenario. In S&P's view, there is
at least a one-in-two chance that it may lower or suspend the
rating on the bonds within the next 90 days.

During the CreditWatch period, S&P will continue to follow up with
the trustee to request prior and future debt service payments
information, and debt service schedule to complete its review.

"Failure to receive additional information within 90 days could
result in our suspension of the affected rating, preceded, in
accordance with our policies, by any change to the rating that we
consider appropriate given available information," Mr. Cruz
continued. "However, if we receive information that we consider
sufficient and of satisfactory quality, we will conduct a full
review and take a rating action within 90 days of the CreditWatch
placement."


LASALLE GROUP: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: The LaSalle Group, Inc.
             aka The LaSalle Group
             545 E. John Carpenter Frwy., Ste. 500
             Irving, TX 75062

Business Description: The LaSalle Group, Inc., along with certain
                      of its subsidiaries, designs, develops,
                      builds, and owns interests in memory care
                      assisted living communities designed
                      specifically for people with Alzheimer's and

                      other forms of dementia.  The communities
                      operate under the name Autumn Leaves.
                      LaSalle is a holding company for numerous
                      wholly owned, non-debtor subsidiaries and
                      affiliates.  LaSalle directly and indirectly
                      owns interests in 40 memory care assisted
                      living communities located in Texas,
                      Illinois, Georgia, Florida, Kansas,
                      Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and
                      Wisconsin.  

                      http://www.lasallegroup.com/

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 2, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Texas (Dallas)

Five affiliates that filed voluntary petitions seeking relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                       Case No.
     ------                                       --------
     The LaSalle Group, Inc. (Lead Case)          19-31484
     West Houston Memory Care, LLC                19-31485
     Cinco Ranch Memory Care, LLC                 19-31486
     Pearland Memory Care, LLC                    19-31488
     Riverstone Memory Care, LLC                  19-31493

Judge: Hon. Stacey G. Jernigan

Debtors' Counsel: Vickie L. Driver, Esq.
                  Christina W. Stephenson, Esq.
                  Christopher M. Staine, Esq.
                  CROWE & DUNLEVY, P.C.
                  Spaces McKinney Avenue
                  1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100
                  Dallas, TX 75201
                  Tel: 214.420.2163
                  Fax: 214.736.1762
                  E-mail: vickie.driver@crowedunlevy.com
                  E-mail: christina.stephenson@crowedunlevy.com
                  E-mail: christopher.stane@crowedunlevy.com

Debtors'
Claims Agent:     DONLIN, RECANO & COMPANY, INC.
                 
https://www.donlinrecano.com/Clients/lasalle/Index

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Karen Nicolaou, chief restructuring
officer.

A full-text copy of The LaSalle Group, Inc.'s petition is available
for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-31484.pdf

List of Debtors' 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
1. Hunton Andrews Kurth, LLP        Trade Payable        $349,068
PO Box 301276
Dallas TX 75303-1276
Tel: 713-220-4200
Fax: 713-220-4285

2. O'Brien Architects Inc.          Trade Payable        $135,301
5310 Harvest Hill Ste 136 LB 161
Dallas TX 75230
Tel: 972-788-1010
Email: kathy.filbert@obrienarch.com

3. Origin Bank                      Trade Payable        $129,994
3838 Oak Law Ave Ste P100
Dallas TX 75219
Tel: 214-432-2899
Email: MAS@sbaitilaw.com

4. Cigna Health and Life Ins Co     Trade Payable        $113,057
P.O. Box 644546
Pittsburgh PA 15264-4546
Tel: 423-954-5730

5. CliftonLarsonAllen LLP           Trade Payable         $82,520
PO Box 679334
Dallas TX 75267-9334
Tel: 817-877-5000
Fax: 817-877-5330
Email: connie.bryant@claconnect.com

6. CNA Insurance                    Trade Payable         $66,250
Paragon Asset Recovery Services Inc
PO Box 6065-02
Hermitage PA 16148-1065
Tel: 888-403-7744
Fax: 800-236-2604
Email: Ame.Janaszek@recovery-group.com

7. Curtis Group Architects LTD      Trade Payable         $38,323
5000 Quorum Dr Ste 500
Dallas TX 75254
Tel: 214-378-9810

8. Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP         Trade Payable         $29,250
4350 Congress Street Ste 900
PO Box 602828
Charlotte NC 28260-2828
Tel: 404-575-8900
Fax: 404-575-8860
Email: diane.lacasse@dhg.com

9. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash,         Trade Payable         $18,892
Smaok & Stewart
PO Box 89
Columbia SC 29202
Tel: 864-241-1900
Fax: 386-423-4649
Email: acctsreceivable@ogletreedeakins.com

10. The Village at Silver Sage      Trade Payable         $12,246
6363 Woodway Drive Suite 410
Houston TX 77057
Tel: 281-996-0101

11. VMG Health                      Trade Payable         $10,350
PO Box 674046
Dallas TX 75267-4046
Tel: 214-369-4888
Fax: 214-369-0541

12. Bell Nunnally                   Trade Payable          $9,223
3232 McKinney Ave Ste 1400
Dallas TX 75204-2429
Tel: 214-740-1400
Fax: 214-740-1499
Email: accountingdepartment@bellnunnally.com

13. Westfield Bank FSB              Trade Payable          $7,382
PO Box 668
Westfield Center OH 44251-0668
Tel: 800-368-8930
Fax: 330-887-8241
Email: premiumfinance@westfield-bank.com

14. SAS Architects & Planners       Trade Payable          $6,675
630 Dundee Rd., Ste. 110
Northbrook IL 60062
Tel: 847-564-8333
Fax: 847-564-9989
Email: lisa@sasarch.com

15. Capital Center Land             Trade Payable          $6,308
Condo Assn Inc.
4077 Taminami Trail
North Ste D-201
Naples FL 32502
Tel: 239-261-1734

16. Cannon & Cannon INC             Trade Payable          $5,564
8550 Kingston Pike
Knoxville TN 37919
Tel: 865-670-8555
Fax: 864-670-8866

17. Monster Worldwide Inc.          Trade Payable          $5,222
P.O. Box 90364
Chicago IL 60696-0364
Tel: 800-666-7837
Email: john.hunt@monster.com

18. Fidelity - 401(K)               Trade Payable          $4,604
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati OH 75277-001
Tel: 800-448-6668

19. Popp Hutcheson PLLC             Trade Payable          $4,578
1301 South Mopac Suite 430
Austin TX 78746
Tel: 512-473-2661
Fax: 512-479-8013
Email: pam.slack@property-tax.com

20. GSI Engineering, LLC            Trade Payable          $4,300
4503 East 47th Street South
Wichita KS 67210-1651
Tel: 316-554-0725
Fax: 316-554-0744
Email: klewman@gsinetwork.com


LIBERTY UNION: A.M. Best Affirms B(Fair) FSR, Alters Outlook to Pos
-------------------------------------------------------------------
A.M. Best has revised the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating (Long-Term
ICR) outlook to positive from stable and affirmed the Financial
Strength Rating (FSR) of B (Fair) and the Long-Term ICR of "bb" of
Liberty Union Life Assurance Company (Liberty Union Life) (Troy,
MI). The outlook for the FSR remains stable.

The ratings reflect Liberty Union Life's balance sheet strength,
which AM Best categorizes as adequate, as well as its marginal
operating performance, limited business profile and marginal
enterprise risk management.

The revised Long-Term ICR outlook for Liberty Union Life reflects
significantly higher operating and net income reported in 2018,
driven by a sizable release of excess reserves that materially
strengthened the company's absolute capital and surplus, as well as
its estimated Bes's Capital Adequacy Ratio. However, AM Best notes
that the company's level of absolute capital and surplus remains
relatively modest.

Liberty Union Life continues to be challenged by a limited business
profile, reflecting its modest market share, a business
concentration in its small group fully funded medical stop-loss
product and geographic concentration in Michigan, as well as highly
competitive major medical and supplemental accident and health
markets, which include larger national and regional health
carriers.

Liberty Union Life also has been challenged by overall marginal
operating performance in recent years, reflecting a downward trend
in net premium that has been driven by terminations of medical
stop-loss business due to rate increases and the runoff of its
closed major medical and mini-med segments. Generally, unfavorable
underwriting experience during this period has resulted in nominal
operating gains and net income, as well as modest operating and net
losses in 2017. Additionally, the company's return on equity and
return on revenue metrics have been below industry averages.


LOWER CADENCE: Fitch Assigns 'B+' First-Time LT IDR, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a first-time Long-Term Issuer Default
Rating of 'B+' to Lower Cadence Holdings, LLC and a 'BB'/'RR2'
rating to the company's proposed Senior Secured Term Loan B. The
Recovery Rating of 'RR2' for the proposed Term Loan B reflects
Fitch's expectation for superior recovery (71%-90%) in the event of
default.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

Stonepeak Cadence Holdings, LLC, an affiliate of Stonepeak
Infrastructure Partners, is acquiring all assets of Oryx Southern
Delaware Holdings LLC and Oryx Delaware Holdings LLC for a purchase
price of approximately $3.6 billion. The transaction will
consolidate Oryx I and II into a single borrower and will be funded
with a $1.5 billion Senior Secured Term Loan B, a $150 million
Super Priority RCF, and $2.393 billion of Stonepeak and Management
rollover Equity. A portion of the proceeds from the $1.5 billion
term loan will be used to repay the remaining balance on the
existing Oryx I's $800 million Term Loan and $80 million Super
Priority Revolver.

The ratings reflect the favorable production economics associated
with Lower Cadence's footprint in the Permian basin and the
expected cash flow stability under its fixed fee contract profile.
The ratings recognize Lower Cadence's size and scale, high initial
leverage level, counterparty risk, project execution and volumetric
risk, as well as competitive risks that the company faces as a
single basin crude oil Gathering and transportation service
provider.

Concerns focus on Lower Cadence's high initial leverage, volumetric
exposure, and execution risk associated with Oryx II construction.
Fitch forecasts the company's leverage (Total Debt/Adjusted EBITDA)
to be initially high and above 8.5x by the end of 2019 following
the issuance of its proposed $1.500 billion Term Loan during 2Q19.
Deleveraging in forecast years will be largely dependent on the
completion of Oryx II expansion by 1Q20 and the projected ramp in
production volume in relation to the expanded system. Management
expects the completion of infield build-out in 1Q20, at which point
the system should be at full run rate. Term loan amortization (1%
per annum) and debt payment under the excess cash flow sweep will
also support deleveraging through 2021. Fitch forecasts Lower
Cadence's leverage (Total Debt/Adjusted EBITDA) to be between 5.5x
and 5.8x by 2020YE, which remains relatively high for a single
basin crude oil gathering and transportation entity that can be
subject to outsized producer or event risks. Fitch views completion
risk for Oryx II as relatively low since the majority of
construction for the main transport line is already finished.
However, any unexpected delays or setbacks in the remaining
construction would hamper volume growth and impair Lower Cadence's
future cash flow, slowing its expected deleveraging pace.

Additional concerns also reflect Lower Cadence's counterparty risk,
limited size and scale, as well as geographic and business line
diversity. Over 70% of the company's 2020E volumes are comprised of
non-investment grade customers. Given its single basin focus and
lack of business line diversity, Lower Cadence is subject to event
risk should there be a slow-down or longer-term disruption of
production in the Permian Southern Delaware region.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Elevated Initial Leverage: Fitch forecasts Lower Cadence's leverage
(Total debt/Adjusted EBITDA) to be initially high above 8.5X by
yearend 2019 following the issuance of its proposed $1,500 million
Term Loan. Fitch expects the company's leverage to improve to
5.5x-5.8x by year-end 2020 through earnings growth, term loan
amortization (1% per annum) and cash flow sweep. The credit
facility covenant allows restricted payments of available cash
should Lower Cadence maintain Net Debt leverage 4.5x or less and
Fixed Charge Ratio at 2.0x. Fitch expects the sponsor will commit
to deleverage Lower Cadence to reach net debt leverage around
4.2x-4.5x, which would allow for the maximum amount of
distributions to sponsors, given the cash flow sweep and restricted
payments covenant. Lower Cadence has modest capex required from
2Q19 primarily for infield gathering, additional well connects and
pipeline interconnects to accommodate volume growth and system
maintenance.

Small, Single Basin Provider: Lower Cadence is a relatively small
crude oil gathering and transportation services provider that
operates predominantly in the Southern Delaware region of the
Permian basin and is expected to generate an annual EBITDA of less
than $500 million in the near term. Given its single basin focus
and lack of business line diversity, the company is subject to
outsized event risk should there be a slow down or longer-term
disruption in the Delaware basin production. This limiting factor
is somewhat offset by Lower Cadence's geographic presence in one of
North America's highest growth upstream areas where crude
production is expected to remain robust in the near to intermediate
term, and Lower Cadence will be a beneficiary of this growth.

Counterparty Exposure: Lower Cadence has 64 rigs across
approximately 22 customers with 100% fixed fee contracts that
eliminate direct commodity price exposure. These contracts vary in
length, with a weighted average tenor of approximately 10 years,
and further supported by acreage dedications, which require that
all crude production under these dedicated areas to utilize the
system. Lower Cadence is, however, exposed to counterparty risk as
the majority of its customers are non-investment grade
counterparties, which are estimated to contribute the bulk of Lower
Cadence's 2020E volumes. Fitch believes these high-yield E&P
companies as lacking the geographic breadth and equivalent downside
protection through hedges relative to their investment grade peers
and are therefore exposed to greater credit risk amidst a volatile
commodities price environment. Offsetting some of this counterparty
risk, most of Lower Cadence's major producers are pure-play Permian
players that have been significantly ramping up their production in
recent years and are expected to continue to do so in the near
term.

Competitive Risk: Fitch recognizes that growth for Lower Cadence
beyond its existing dedicated acreage position and areas of mutual
interest (AMI) may come from a highly competitive process with
producers. The company operates in an attractive producing region,
and outside of its existing footprint it will need to compete with
others including some midstream companies that are larger in size
and scale.

Oryx II Completion Risk: Fitch does not view the execution risk
regarding Oryx II completion as significant given the remaining
unfinished parts are largely related to infield buildouts and
producer well connections that are expected to be completed over
the course of 2019. However, any further delays or unexpected
setback could impede Lower Cadence's projected volume growth, which
would lead to a longer than expected deleveraging pace. The main
450 mbbl/d transport line was already fully constructed and placed
in service December 2018, and additional volumes are expected to
ramp throughout 2019. Total system volumes will remain constrained
and unable to capture all the additional volumes produced by its
customers under their dedicated acreage until the entire Oryx II
system becomes operational by 1Q20.

Supportive Sponsor: On April 2, 2019, Stonepeak agreed to acquire
all the assets of Lower Cadence which are owned by affiliates of
Quantum Energy Partners, Post Oak Energy Capital, Concho Resources,
WPX Energy and other investors. Fitch expects Lower Cadence to
receive a similar level of financial support as from the previous
sponsors. Stonepeak management has a history of investments in the
midstream space, with about 40% of its overall investments in this
sector.

Favorable Production Fundamentals: The Permian basin remains as one
of the most prolific production basins in the U.S. given its strong
basin economics. Crude production in the Permian has grown
significantly in the past years and Fitch believes that this is
expected to rise in the near term, considering theproduction
economics within the region. Lower Cadence operates its gathering
and transport system in the Southern Delaware basin, where it has
one of the lowest breakeven costs (approximately $22-$40/bbl) and
one of the highest producer IRRs in North America. Reeves County,
where Lower Cadence is predominantly focussed, has also
consistently been the one of the top five oil production counties
throughout Texas in the past year. Lower Cadence's throughput
volumes have grown since inception in early 2016 amidst commodities
price volatility. Customers have dedicated approximately 940,000
acres to the company and are currently actively drilling within
this dedicated acreage with 64 rigs currently running on the
dedicated acres, providing growth upside should producers continue
to develop their acreage.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Lower Cadence's ratings are limited by the size and scale of
operations of the company, a single basin focused crude oil
gathering and transportation service provider operating in the
Delaware Basin of the Permian. Fitch typically views the credit
profiles of single asset/basin focused midstream service providers
as more consistent with a 'B' range IDR. However, Lower Cadence's
favorable geographical presence in the Delaware Basin of West
Texas, where Fitch expects significant volume growth, along with
the company's long-term fixed fee contracts with significant
acreage dedications help to somewhat mitigate size and scale
concerns.

In addition, Fitch's size and scale concerns about midstream energy
issuers tends to be focused on facilitating access to capital for
meeting funding needs, with larger entities more easily able to
access capital markets. Fitch does not expect Lower Cadence to have
any near-term need to access capital markets until term loan
maturity. By that time the company may be significantly larger with
size and scale more consistent with other 'BB' rated midstream
names, though it is still likely to be a single basin gathering and
transportation company, which limits geographic and business line
diversity. Furthermore, Fitch expects Lower Cadence to be FCF
positive in 2020 through the rating horizon. This is somewhat
unique relative to Fitch's other midstream energy coverage, which
across most rating categories (BBB and BB) tends to be FCF (after
dividends/distribution) negative due in part to the preponderance
of master limited partnerships within Fitch's midstream coverage.

Relative to the lower-rated 'B' Navitas Midstream, Lower Cadence is
slightly larger in size with greater acreage dedication and
generates more cash flow under fixed fee contracts. Fitch projects
Lower Cadence to have a high initial leverage metrics (Total Debt/
Adjusted EBITDA) in the range of 8.7-8.9x for 2019 and de-lever to
approximately 5.5-5.7x in 2020YE. Compared to its 'BB-' IDR peers,
Medallion Midland Acquisition (BB-/Negative Outlook) and Lucid
Energy Group II Borrower (BB-/Stable Outlook), Lower Cadence has
weaker initial leverage metrics and a slightly weaker counterparty
profile with a majority of its E&P producer customers being unrated
or non-investment grade. Fitch expects production growth during the
forecast period to be subdued relative to current levels. Lower
Cadence faces some minor completion and volumetric risk associated
with the remaining build out of the Oryx II expansion project.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  - Production volume ramps up through forecast years driven
    by the completion of Oryx II project as well as increased
    production from its existing customers. No new acreage
    dedications or new customers assumed;

  - Remaining portion of Oryx II to be completed by 1Q20;

  - Modest capex spent in forecast years for additional
    well connects and systems maintenance;

  - No dividend payments assumed, although Fitch expects
    dividend payments can begin in 2021 as the restricted
    payment covenant is met;

  - Deleveraging supported by term loan amortisation (1%
    per annum) and debt repayment under excess cashflow sweep;

  - Fitch's base case WTI oil price that trends up from
    $57.50/barrel in 2019 and 2020 and a long-term price
    of $55/barrel.

Recovery Rating Assumptions:

In its recovery analysis, Fitch assumes that Lower Cadence would be
considered a going-concern in bankruptcy and that the company would
be reorganized rather than liquidated. Fitch uses a 6.0x EBITDA
multiple for the recovery analysis. Reorganization multiples can
vary widely based upon the commodity price environment upon
emergence, as well as company specific factors that led to
restructuring, including full-cycle cost positions, untenable
capital structures, or debt-funded M&A activity. There have been a
limited number of bankruptcies and reorganizations within the
midstream sector.

Two recent gathering and processing bankruptcies of companies with
a short pre-bankruptcy life indicate that pro forma exit Enterprise
Value over pre-distress EBITDA provide an approximate range of
multiples between 3.5x and 7.0x. Lower Cadence shares a similar
asset profile to these entities as a single basin midstream crude
gathering and transportation service provider, but it operates in
the Permian basin where Fitch has greater growth prospects guidance
for E&P production. Based on Fitch's most recent Energy, Power and
Commodities Bankruptcy Enterprise Vale and Credit Recoveries report
(published March 2018) the median enterprise valuation exit
multiple for the 29 Energy cases reviewed was 6.7x, with a wide
range. The average recovery rate was 84% (equivalent to 'RR2' on
Fitch's Recovery Rating scale) for 86 first-lien issues in the
Energy, Power and Commodities sector case studies.

Fitch's going concern EBITDA assumption is $230-240 million as a
mid-cycle estimate of sustainable EBITDA for the company post
default and bankruptcy emergence. Using this going concern EBITDA
and assuming a fully drawn revolver as well as a 10% administrative
claim in the recovery calculation, the term loan's Recovery Rating
is 'RR2', indicating superior recovery prospects (71% - 90%) in the
event of default.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  - Increases its size, scale, asset, geographic or business line
diversity, with a focus on EBITDA above $300 million per annum
while maintaining leverage (Total Debt/ Adjusted EBITDA) at or
below 5.0x basis;

  - Completion of Oryx II expansion with no further delays and
realized volume growth associated with the expansion will increase
recovery prospect on the secured term loan and could lead to
positive rating action on the term loan.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  - Delays in the completion of the remaining portion of Oryx II
which negatively impacts production volume growth;

  - Slowdown in volume growth expected across Lower Cadence's
dedicated acreage, as evidenced by a decline in rig count or a
moderation in daily volumes through its system;

  - Meaningful deterioration in counterparty credit quality or a
significant event at a major counterparty that impairs cash flow;

  - Leverage above 6.0x on a sustained basis. Fitch expects Lower
Cadence's leverage to be above 8.5x by 2019 year end and gradually
improve to 4.2x-4.5x by 2021 year-end;

  - A significant change in cash flow stability profile, driven by
a move away from currently majority of revenue being fee based. If
revenue commodity price exposure were to increase above 25%, Fitch
would likely take negative ratings action.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity Adequate: Lower Cadence will have access to a $150
million Super Secured revolving credit facility that matures in
five years (2024). It will also issue $1,500 million of senior
secured term loan with a manageable maturity of seven years (2026).
These facilities have the option of being increased by an aggregate
amount of $150 million, of which $25 million can comprise of
incremental revolver borrowings. The term loan requires a six-month
Debt Service Reserve Account (DSRA), which will be funded at
closing, as well as a cash flow sweep and mandatory amortization of
1% per annum. Fitch expects Lower Cadence to be FCF positive in
2H20 and growing with projected volume increases. Capex is expected
to remain modest and is mainly for additional well connects and
system maintenance.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has assigned the following first-time ratings:

Lower Cadence Holdings, LLC

  -- Long Term IDR 'B+';

  -- Senior Secured Term Loan B 'BB'/'RR2'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


MACAULEY CONTRACTING: May 23 Plan Confirmation Hearing
------------------------------------------------------
The Disclosure Statement explaining the small business Chapter 11
combined plan filed by Macauley Contracting, LLC, is conditionally
approved.

A hearing will be held on May 23, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., and for
confirmation of the Plan before the Honorable Andrew B. Altenburg,
Jr., United States Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey, 400
Cooper Street, Camden, in Courtroom 4B.

May 16 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving written
objections to the Disclosure Statement and confirmation of the
Plan.  May 16 is fixed as the last day for filing written
acceptances or rejections of the Plan.

A full-text copy of the small business Chapter 11 combined plan and
disclosure statement is available at https://tinyurl.com/yxsabzom
from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Macauley Contracting, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D.N.J. Case No. 19-10990) on Jan. 16, 2019.  The Debtor tapped
Maureen P. Steady, Esq., t Kurtzman | Steady, LLC, as counsel.


MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Two affiliates that have filed voluntary petitions seeking relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                       Case No.
     ------                                       --------
     Marine Environmental Remediation Group LLC   19-18994
     12 Hillcrest Road
     Mountain Lakes, NJ 07046-1327

     MER Group Puerto Rico LLC                    19-18995
     Pier 3, Roosevelt Roads
     Ceiba, PR 00735

Business Description: MER Group -- http://www.mergroupllc.com--
                      provides ship recycling services at
                      facilities in the United States and Europe.
                      MER claims to have pioneered an
                      environmentally-sensitive process of
                      dismantling obsolete vessels that meets or
                      exceeds all U.S. EPA, OSHA, state and
                      Commonwealth regulations.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of New Jersey (Newark)

Judge: Hon. Vincent F. Papalia

Debtors' Counsel: Jeffrey D. Vanacore, Esq.
                  PERKINS COIE LLP
                  30 Rockefeller Plaza, 22nd Floor
                  New York City, NY 10112
                  Tel: (212) 262-6912
                       (212) 262-6900
                  Fax: (212) 977-1642
                  E-mail: JVanacore@perkinscoie.com

                    - and -

                  Schuyler G. Carroll, Esq.
                  PERKINS COIE LLP
                  30 Rockefeller Plaza
                  22nd Floor
                  New York, NY 10112-0085
                  Tel: 212-262-6900
                  E-mail: scaroll@perkinscoie.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petitions were signed by Martin Vulaj, chief executive
officer.

A full-text copy of Marine Environmental 's petition containing,
among other items, a list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured
creditors is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb19-18994.pdf

A full-text copy of MER Group's petition containing, among other
items, a list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb19-18995.pdf


MCGRAW-HILL EDUCATION: S&P Affirms 'B' ICR on Cengage Merger Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its ratings on U.S.-based education
material and learning solutions provider McGraw-Hill Education Inc.
(MHE), including the 'B' issuer credit rating, and assigned its
preliminary 'B+' issue-level rating and preliminary '2' recovery
rating to the company's proposed $3.7 billion first-lien debt. The
preliminary '2' recovery rating indicates its expectation for
substantial (70%-90%; rounded estimate: 85%) recovery of principal
for lenders in the event of a payment default.

The affirmation follows the joint announcement that MHE has agreed
to merge with Cengage Learning Holdings II Inc. The transaction is
a stock-for-stock deal in which MHE's existing financial sponsor
(Apollo) and Cengage's existing financial sponsors in alphabetical
order (Apax Partners, KKR, and Searchlight Capital) will each
receive half of the stock of the combined company. The companies
expect regulatory approval and closing by early 2020. As part of
the proposed merger, MHE is seeking to refinance MHE's and
Cengage's existing term loans and MHE's $350 million revolving
credit facility into a new $3.7 billion credit facility due 2024.
S&P has assigned the proposed debt its preliminary ratings, which
assumes, among other things, all the existing senior secured term
loans are refinanced. MHE's and Cengage's existing senior unsecured
notes will remain outstanding after the merger and will be
cross-guaranteed.

"We expect the new company to be called McGraw Hill; it will have
greater scale and improve profit margins and cash flow generation
given management's expectations for about $300 million in cost
savings mainly through the rationalization of sales force and other
corporate functions. However, McGraw Hill will be highly leveraged,
with roughly $4.5 billion in debt," S&P said.

On a combined basis, adjusted debt to EBITDA was 9x and adjusted
FOCF to debt was 4% as of fiscal 2019 (ended March 31). S&P expects
leverage and FOCF to debt to improve to about 6.5x and 7%,
respectively, in fiscal 2021. The rating agency expects leverage to
decline to the 5x area in fiscal 2022 as the company realizes a
majority of its synergies. S&P expects capital spending to decline
over the next few years on lower digital investments. It also
expects pre-publication spending to slow as digital revenue
contributes an increasing portion of revenues.

S&P's rating also reflects the company's exposure to declining
enrollment and competition from used and rental textbooks in its
higher education segment and volatile state and local budgetary
spending in its K-12 segment. The rating agency expects fiscal 2020
to be a transition period for McGraw Hill as it begins implementing
its cost saving plan and aligns its strategic initiatives -- such
as the higher education unlimited subscription business model and
book rental program, sales organization, and content development.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that operating
performance at stand-alone MHE will remain stable before the
closing and that the combined company will benefit from meaningful
cost savings that could lead to deleveraging. S&P expects debt
leverage for the combined company to be about 7x at the end of
fiscal 2020, and improving to about 6.5x by fiscal 2021, with FOCF
to debt at 7%.

"We could lower the ratings if operating performance deteriorated
because of integration challenges or increased competitive results
in minimal cash flow generation, such that FOCF to debt were below
5% on a sustained basis," S&P said, adding that it could also lower
its ratings if the merger did not close as expected, realized cost
savings fell short of expectations, or if the financial sponsors
increased their financial risk tolerance, such as debt-financed
dividend payments.

"We believe an upgrade is unlikely over the next 12 to 24 months.
However, we could raise the rating if the company successfully
integrated Cengage and generated significant free cash flow,
leading to leverage below 5x on a sustained basis in conjunction
with the sponsors' commitment to maintain leverage at those
levels," S&P said. A consideration for a higher rating would also
entail substantial progress in transforming the company to a
digital model to offset the natural cyclicality in the K-12
business, according to the rating agency.


MCGRAW-HILL GLOBAL: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR Amid Cengage Deal
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B3 Corporate Family Rating, a
B3-PD Probability of Default Rating, and a stable outlook to
McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC following its announced
merger of equals with Cengage Learning, Inc.. Moody's also assigned
a B2 rating to McGraw's amended and extended credit facilities,
comprised of a $350 million first lien senior secured revolver due
2024 and a $3,342 million first lien senior secured term loan due
2024. Moody's downgraded McGraw's existing senior secured credit
facilities to B2 from B1, and ratings on these facilities will be
withdrawn upon closing. Moody's also downgraded McGraw's $400
million in senior unsecured notes due 2024 to Caa2 from Caa1.
Moody's has withdrawn the B2 CFR, B2-PD PDR and negative outlook
for MHGE Parent, LLC as there is no rated debt outstanding at that
entity.

Moody's also affirmed Cengage's B3 CFR, and B3-PD PDR ratings, and
expects these ratings to be withdrawn upon closing. Moody's also
affirmed the B2 rating of Cengage's senior secured term loan, which
is expected to be withdrawn at closing. Ratings on Cengage's $620
million senior unsecured notes due 2024 were affirmed at Caa2. The
outlook for Cengage is unchanged at stable and is expected to be
withdrawn upon close.

Cengage Learning, Inc. (the Cengage US operating entity and
borrower) will merge with and into McGraw-Hill Global Education
Holdings, LLC upon closing of the transaction. The announced rating
actions are subject to review of final documentation and no
meaningful change in conditions of the proposed transaction as
presented to Moody's.

Assignments:

Issuer: McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC

  Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B3

  Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B3-PD

  $3,342 Million Gtd Senior Secured 1st lien Term Loan
  B1 due 2024, Assigned B2 (LGD3)

  $350 Million Gtd Senior Secured 1st lien Revolving
  Credit Facility due 2024, Assigned B2 (LGD3)

Affirmations:

Issuer: Cengage Learning, Inc.

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3, to be withdrawn
  upon closing

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B3-PD, to be
  withdrawn upon closing

  $1,663 million Senior Secured Term Loan due 2023, Affirmed
  B2 (LGD3), to be withdrawn upon closing

  $620 million Senior Unsecured Global Notes due 2024,
  Affirmed Caa2 (LGD5)

Downgrades:

Issuer: McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC

  $1,679 Million Senior Secured Term loan B due 2022, Downgraded
to
  B2 (LGD3) from B1 (LGD3), to be withdrawn upon closing

  $350 Million Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility due 2021,
  Downgraded to B2 (LGD3) from B1 (LGD3), to be withdrawn upon
  closing

  $400 Million Senior Unsecured Senior Global Notes due 2024,
  Downgraded to Caa2 (LGD5) from Caa1 (LGD5)

Withdrawals:

Issuer: MHGE Parent, LLC

  Corporate Family Rating, Withdrawn , previously rated B2

  Probability of Default Rating, Withdrawn , previously rated
  B2-PD

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC

  Outlook, Assigned Stable

Issuer: MHGE Parent, LLC

  Outlook, Changed To Rating Withdrawn From Negative

Issuer: Cengage Learning, Inc.

  Outlook, Unchanged at Stable, to be withdrawn upon closing

RATINGS RATIONALE

McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC's B3 CFR is based on the
large scale and diversified operations stemming from it combination
with Cengage, the potential of significant synergies as the
companies integrate, growth opportunities via new digital products
and business partnerships and from rebounding enrollment and
calendar adoptions, and adequate liquidity. The rating is
constrained by elevated debt/EBITDA leverage of about 9.5x (Moody's
adjusted, as at December 31, 2018, pro forma for the business
combination but excluding synergies), the result of ongoing secular
pressures and aggressive financial policies flowing from private
equity ownership, likely execution risks that may limit synergies
as the companies integrate, and uncertainties relating to calendar
adoption wins and open territory purchasing, enrollment levels,
student behavior towards learning courseware acquisition, and the
trajectory of ongoing secular pressures.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations that consolidated
entity will begin to return to positive revenue and operating
income growth over the next 12-18 months due to stronger adoption
calendar and better penetration through the unlimited subscription
product in higher education. Moody's expects underlying secular
challenges to remain, and anticipate some de-levering through
execution of cost saving initiatives. The current rating and
outlook do not incorporate any further share repurchases or debt
funded distributions, which if occur, may result in a negative
rating action. The outlook incorporates its expectation that McGraw
will maintain good liquidity with no significant drawdowns under
the revolver over the next 12 months providing the company some
flexibility to execute its operating strategies.

Given the secular trends within the higher education market, recent
weakness in K-12 sector, pending potential integration risk and
high leverage upgrade is unlikely. Improved higher education
enrollment levels, demonstrated strong organic growth in K-12
segment and stronger competitive position against peers, rental and
used providers and open educational resources could position the
company for an upgrade if demonstrated in the financial
performance. The company would also need to demonstrate organic
revenue and EBITDA growth resulting in debt-to-cash EBITDA being
sustained comfortably below 5x, and Moody's would need to expect
that liquidity will remain good with cash balances being more than
sufficient to cover outflows including seasonal working capital
swings. The company would also need to demonstrate its ability to
maintain good free cash flow.

Ratings could be downgraded if market conditions or competitive
pressures lead to the company to being unable to improve its
revenue or EBITDA over the next 12 months resulting in further
deterioration in liquidity. Ratings could also be downgraded if
additional debt funded distributions lead to increased leverage or
if liquidity were to weaken due to significant revolver usage or
sustained negative free cash flow.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Media Industry
published in June 2017.

McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC is a global provider of
educational materials and learning services targeting the higher
education, K-12, professional learning and information markets with
content, tools and services delivered via digital, print and hybrid
offerings. Cengage Learning, Inc. is a provider of learning
solutions, software and educational services for the higher
education,research, school, career, professional, and international
markets. Cengage publishes college textbooks and reference
materials, and supplements its print publications with digital
solutions. The revenue of combined entity is approximately $3.2
billion.


MGM RESORTS: Fitch Affirms 'BB' IDR Amid Macau Unit's Notes Issue
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned 'BB'/'RR4' ratings to MGM China Holdings
Limited's proposed $1.25 billion senior unsecured notes issuance.
The proceeds will be used to repay amounts outstanding on MGM
China's credit facility and for general corporate purposes. In
addition, Fitch has affirmed MGM China's, MGM Growth Paradise
S.A.'s and MGM Resorts International's Long-Term IDRs at 'BB' as
well as their respective issue ratings. The Rating Outlook is
Stable.

Fitch links MGM and MGM China's IDRs as MGM China, which is 56%
owned by MGM, is viewed as strategically important to MGM. Fitch
also views MGM China's debt covenant ring fencing vis-a-vis
restricted payment covenants as not very restrictive. Linkage is
currently not a material consideration in determining the IDRs as
MGM China's stand-alone and MGM's consolidated credit profiles are
both consistent with a 'BB' category IDR.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Credit Profile Improving: Fitch forecasts MGM Resorts International
to delever below 5.0x on a gross basis by YE 2020. De-levering will
come primarily from EBITDA growth, as MGM Cotai and Springfield
ramp up, Empire City casino is acquired (January 2019) and returns
on the Park MGM investment are realized. MGM seeks to achieve net
leverage of 3x-4x by YE 2020 (Fitch's calculation of net leverage
is roughly 0.7x higher due to its subtraction of minority
distributions from EBITDA). MGM's FCF profile is also improving and
set to exceed $1.0 billion annually by 2020, although
shareholder-friendly activity is also ramping up. Upward credit
momentum may be slowed by a new large-scale project or a pullback
in U.S. economic growth.

Favorable Asset Mix: Since 2016, MGM improved its overall
geographic diversification and expanded its M Life Rewards program.
This was achieved through acquisitions, like Atlantic City's
Borgata (2016), New York's Empire City Casino (2019) and Ohio's
Northfield Park (2018), and new developments in Maryland and
Massachusetts. MGM's portfolio of Las Vegas Strip assets are mostly
high quality and its regional assets are typically market leaders.
The regional portfolio's diversification partially offsets the more
cyclical nature of Las Vegas Strip properties.

MGM Growth Properties: MGP (BB+/Stable) is roughly 70% owned, pro
forma for recent acquisitions and MGP's redemption of OP units from
MGM for the Northfield transaction, and effectively controlled by
MGM. Therefore, Fitch analyzes MGM largely on a consolidated basis.
MGM wants to reduce its ownership stake in MGP to under 50%. Its
ownership of the sole MGP Class B share and controlling voting
power (intact until ownership falls below 30%) will support a
consolidated analysis with adjustments for the minority stake in
MGP.

Positive on Las Vegas: Fitch is positive on the Las Vegas Strip,
which represents about 45% of MGM's consolidated revenues (pro
forma for recent transactions). The Strip should benefit from
continued strength in the convention business and limited new
lodging supply. However, Fitch expects low single-digit gaming
revenue and RevPar growth as the recovery is entering its 10th year
and a number of indicators have reached or surpassed prior-cycle
peaks.

Macau on Solid Footing: Fitch expects flat to low single-digit
growth in Macau gross gaming revenues for 2019. MGM will gain
market share as MGM Cotai continues to ramp up, following the
introduction of VIP operations in late 2018. Fitch forecasts MGM
Cotai will generate over $200 million in incremental EBITDA once
fully ramped up. Fitch's favorable long-term view on Macau is
supported by an expanding middle class in China and infrastructure
development in and around Macau. Fitch feels upcoming concessions
renewals in 2022 will be a pragmatic process as the government
values stability in the marketplace. (MGM China extended its
concession from 2020 to 2022.)

DERIVATION SUMMARY

MGM's current 'BB' IDR considers the issuer's gross debt/EBITDA
slightly over 5.0x (pro forma for annualized results of new
openings, acquired assets, and debt issuances), improving FCF
profile following the completion of its development pipeline, and
its geographically diverse, high quality assets. There is headroom
for funding of another large scale project or a moderate operating
downturn at the current 'BB' rating level given MGM's liquidity
profile and moderate leverage. MGM's liquidity is solid with $850
million in excess cash on hand as of March 31, 2019 (net of
estimated cage cash) and an improving FCF profile.

Fitch links MGM China's IDR to MGM's. Fitch analyzes MGM on a
consolidated basis after adjusting for distributions to minority
interests and distributions from unconsolidated entities. If all of
the proceeds are used to repay MGM China's credit facility amounts
outstanding, the notes issuance is leverage neutral.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  -- Same-store domestic revenues grow about 1%-2% per year on
     average, with higher assumed growth at properties on the
     Las Vegas Strip and still ramping regional properties
     (National Harbor, Springfield).

  -- EBITDA margins from wholly owned subsidiaries remain near
     30%.

  -- MGM China generating about $700 million of aggregate
     EBITDA in 2019, which factors in over $200 million EBITDA
     at MGM Cotai.

  -- Roughly $250 million of incremental EBITDA in 2019 from MGM
     Springfield, Empire City, and Northfield Park;

  -- 5% annual growth for the parent level dividend and a
     majority of cash flow from operations less capex at
     MGM China and MGM Growth Properties is distributed.

  -- $1 billion of total capex in 2019, which includes close
     out costs for MGM Springfield and MGM Cotai. Maintenance
     capex thereafter around $600 million per year.

  -- $750 million in annual share repurchases.

  -- $4.6 billion in note maturities from 2019-2022 are
     refinanced. MGM China amortization is $360 million per year.

  -- Fitch's base case forecast does not include any additional
     developments in new jurisdictions (e.g. Japan).

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- MGM's IDR could be upgraded to 'BB+' as its adjusted debt/
     EBITDAR after adjusting for distributions to minority holders
     and from unconsolidated subsidiaries approaches 4.5x on gross
     basis and 4.0x net basis, respectively. Fitch will consider
     the continuation of the stable or positive trends in Las
Vegas
     and Macau, the renewal of the Macau concession, and MGM's
     commitment to its balance sheet when contemplating positive
     rating actions.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- Fitch would consider a Negative Outlook or downgrade if
adjusted
     gross debt/EBITDAR remains above 6.0x for an extended period
of
     time, due to potentially weaker-than-expected operating
     performance, debt funding a new large-scale project or
     acquisition or taking a more aggressive posture with respect
     to financial policy.

LIQUIDITY

MGM's liquidity is solid and is set to improve further as annual
discretionary FCF grows in excess of $1.0 billion by 2020. Per
Fitch's base case, the primary use of the FCF will be to support
continued ramp up in shareholder returns. MGM repurchased $1.3
billion in shares during 2018 and also pays roughly $260 million in
annual parent dividends. Other uses of cash include $350 million of
close out costs in 2019 for MGM Cotai, Springfield, and Park MGM
(per company guidance). As of March 31, 2019, additional sources of
liquidity include $850 million in consolidated excess cash (net of
estimated cage cash) and $3.8 billion in consolidated revolver
availability. Liquidity is hampered by MGM's maturity schedule,
which remains heavy for a non-investment grade company. This is
largely a by-product of MGM's unsecured notes not having call
options, which is unique among its gaming peers.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has assigned the following rating:

MGM China Holdings Ltd

  -- Senior Unsecured Notes 'BB'/'RR4'.

Fitch affirms the following MGM ratings:

MGM Resorts International

  -- Long-Term IDR at 'BB'; Outlook Stable;

  -- Senior secured credit facility at 'BBB-'/'RR1';

  --  Senior unsecured notes at 'BB'/'RR3'.

MGM China Holdings, Ltd (and MGM Grand Paradise, S.A. as
co-borrower)

  -- Long-Term IDR at 'BB'; Outlook Stable;

  -- Senior secured credit facility at 'BBB-'/'RR1'.'


MGM RESORTS: Moody's Affirms Ba3 CFR Amid Macau Unit's Notes Issue
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba3 rating to the proposed
senior unsecured notes to be issued by MGM China Holdings Limited,
a 55.95% owned discretely financed publicly traded subsidiary of
MGM Resorts International. MGM China owns and operates two resort
casinos in Macau, China that account for approximately 20% of MGM
Resorts consolidated EBITDA. Moody's also affirmed MGM Resorts Ba3
Corporate Family Rating, Ba3-PD Probability of Default Rating, Ba3
senior unsecured ratings and Speculative Grade Liquidity rating of
SGL-1. The outlook is positive. The affirmations reflect Moody's
view that credit metrics will improve over the next 12 -- 18 months
due to higher earnings contributions from the ramp up of MGM Cotai
and modest growth at domestic properties.

Proceeds of the proposed notes will be used to repay MGM China's
existing secured credit facility thereby materially extending the
subsidiary's maturity profile to 2024 and 2026 from the current
bullet maturity in 2022 and beyond the date for renewal of the
Macau sub-concession agreements in 2022.

The Ba3 assigned to MGM Resorts' and MGM China's proposed unsecured
notes is based on a one-notch override of Moody's Loss Given
Default model indicated rating of B1. Moody's decision to override
the LGD model reflects the close proximity of the expected loss
rate (within the stability band) to the Ba3 rating level and its
expectation that MGM Resorts will continue to shift its capital
structure to predominately unsecured over time. MGM China does not
provide any guarantees to MGM Resorts other subsidiaries, and so
creditors of MGM China will continue to have direct claim position
with regards to MGM China's cash flows and recovery prospects.
Similarly, MGM Resorts does not provide any guaranty to MGM China,
and its creditors continue to have a direct claim with respect to
MGM Resorts cash flows and recovery prospects.

MGM Resorts' and MGM China's total debt is 43% secured and 57%
unsecured (assuming full draws of existing revolvers). On a
pro-forma basis 34% is secured and 66% is unsecured.

As of a result of this transaction, MGM China's pro-forma debt
structure will be split 58% secured and 42% unsecured thereby
providing coverage for both classes of debt.

Assignments:

Issuer: MGM China Holdings Limited

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned Ba3 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: MGM Resorts International

  Outlook, Remains Positive

Affirmations:

Issuer: MGM Resorts International

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba3-PD

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Affirmed SGL-1

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba3

  Senior Unsecured Shelf, Affirmed (P)Ba3

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed
  Ba3 (LGD4)

RATINGS RATIONALE

MGM (Ba3 positive) benefits from large scale, a diversified
presence on the Las Vegas Strip across multiple customer segments,
a solid position within several regional markets, and its presence
in the large Macau market with favorable long-term prospects.

MGM is constrained by its concentration in Las Vegas (approximately
61% of consolidated 2018 Adjusted EBITDA), exposure to the Macau
gaming market that is experiencing volatility and the ramp-up risk
associated with recent resort developments - MGM Cotai (opened in
Q1 2018) and MGM Springfield (opened in August 2018) and the
redeveloped Park MGM (completed in December 2018) and the
integration of recent acquisitions (Empire City and MGM Northfield
Park).

Consolidated and restricted group leverage and coverage are
expected to continue to improve due to material earnings growth in
2019 and 2020 principally from the ramp-up of MGM Cotai and
secondarily from recently completed projections, acquisitions and
modest organic growth and operational efficiencies related to the
recently-announced MGM 2020 plan. The company's financial policy
targets is to maintain consolidated net debt/EBITDA in a range of
3.0 - 4.0x by 2020; which roughly translates to 4.5x -5.5x on a
Moody's adjusted basis. Moody's expects MGM will actively pursue
other large integrated resort development projects (e.g. Japan)
that would require significant equity investment and debt to
finance construction and will continue to expand its domestic
operations in partnership with MGM Growth Properties, LLC.

The positive outlook reflects its view that consolidated operating
results will improve over the next year due to higher domestic
earnings, operational efficiencies achieved through the company's
MGM 2020 plan and contribution from recent acquisitions and new
project openings in Massachusetts, Las Vegas, and Macau that will
result in an improvement in credit metrics to levels supportive of
a higher rating.

Ratings could be upgraded if: Consolidated debt/EBITDA is sustained
below 5.0x, fixed charge coverage remains above 2.0x; the company
maintains sufficient liquidity to support both recourse and
non-recourse subsidiaries; operating results of MGM China
operations, including MGM Cotai, track to estimated levels and
share repurchases are funded with asset sale proceeds or cash on
hand rather than debt. The credit ratios required for an upgrade
also takes into account that reported credit metrics may experience
some variability due to the timing of new resort openings and the
closing of the announced and potential acquisitions.

Ratings could be downgraded if the result of the independent board
includes returns to shareholders that would delay the improvement
in credit metrics, operating results from new project openings fall
materially below estimates, if consolidated gross debt/ EBITDA is
sustained above 6.0x, if EBITDA/fixed charges declines below 1.75x
or the company deviates materially from its financial policy
goals.

MGM owns and operates the Bellagio, MGM Grand, Circus Circus
located on the Las Vegas Strip in Nevada and MGM Springfield in
Massachusetts which opened in late 2018. MGM owns approximately 56%
of MGM China Holdings Limited, which owns the MGM Macau resort and
casino and MGM Cotai which opened in February 2018. MGM also owns
50% of CityCenter in Las Vegas and approximately 69% of MGM Growth
Properties (MGP), a real estate investment trust formed in April
2016. MGM has entered into a long-term triple net master lease with
MGP pursuant to which the company leases and operates for MGP
fourteen properties. Consolidated net revenues for the LTM period
ended March 31, 2019 were approximately $12.1 billion.


MGM RESORTS: S&P Affirms BB- ICR Amid Macau Unit's Notes Issuance
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings related that MGM China Holdings Ltd. (MGM
China), a Macau-based subsidiary of MGM Resorts International,
plans to issue $1.25 billion of unsecured notes to repay a portion
of its outstanding secured debt.

S&P assigned its 'BB-' issuer credit rating to MGM China. S&P also
assigned its 'BB-' issue-level rating to MGM China's proposed
aggregate $1.25 billion unsecured notes due 2024 and 2026.

In addition, S&P also affirmed its existing ratings on MGM Resorts
and its other subsidiaries, including the 'BB-' issuer credit
ratings.

The rating actions on MGM and MGM China reflect S&P's view that
although the refinancing transaction will increase MGM China's
financial flexibility by improving its maturity profile and
broadening its capital markets access, it will not materially alter
S&P's forecast for credit measures over the next few years given it
is primarily a debt-for-debt refinancing. S&P expects  MGM's
leverage will be in the high-4x area in 2019, and improve to the
low-4x area in 2020, which provides ample cushion compared to S&P's
5.5x adjusted leverage downgrade threshold.

The stable rating outlook reflects S&P's expectation that MGM's
leverage will improve to the mid- to high-4x area through 2019 as a
result of recently completed acquisitions and ongoing investments
in the business. Although share repurchases could slow the pace of
leverage improvement, S&P expects MGM's leverage will improve over
the next year and the company will have good cushion relative to
S&P's 5.5x downgrade threshold.


MID-CITIES HOME: Seeks to Hire CR3 Partners, Appoint CRO
--------------------------------------------------------
Mid-Cities Home Medical Equipment Co. seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas to hire CR3
Partners, LLC and designate William Roberts as chief restructuring
officer.

Mid-Cities requires CR3 to:

     a. review and analyze the financial and operational position
of the Debtor;

     b. evaluate and investigate potential strategies for the
restructuring and refinancing of the Debtor;

     c. prepare data and analyses to meet the requests of the
Debtor's financial constituents, including its secured lender;

     d. provide oversight and support to the Debtor's other
professionals in connection with the execution of the Debtor's
plan, sales process and the overall administration of its Chapter
11 case;

     e. provide oversight and assistance in connection with the
preparation of financial-related disclosures required by the
bankruptcy court;

     f. provide oversight and assistance in connection with the
preparation of financial information for distribution to
creditors;

     g. participate in meetings and provide assistance to any
official committees appointed in the case, the U.S. Trustee and
other other parties in interest;

     h. evaluate, make recommendations and implement strategic
alternatives to maximize the value of the Debtor's assets;

     i. evaluate, analyze and make recommendations relating to the
Debtor's assets;

     j. provide oversight and assistance in connection with the
preparation of analysis of creditor claims;

     k. provide oversight and assistance in connection with the
evaluation and analysis of avoidance actions;

     l. provide testimony in litigations as required;

     m. evaluate the cash flow generation capabilities of the
Debtor for valuation maximization opportunities;

     n. provide oversight and assistance in connection with
communications and negotiations with the Debtor's constituents
including investors;

     o. assist in the formulation of a plan of reorganization or
liquidation and in the preparation of information and analysis
necessary for the confirmation of the plan; and
     
     p. perform other tasks as directed by the Debtor and agreed to
by CR3, including all tasks necessary to facilitate the Debtor's
restructuring.

CR3's hourly rates are:

     Bill Roberts (CRO)    $525
     Consultants           $250 - $300

William Roberts, a member of CR3, assured the court that his firm
is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     William L. Roberts
     CR3 Partners, LLC
     13355 Noel Road, Suite 310
     Dallas, TX 75240
     Phone: +1 (800) 728-7176

                    About Mid-Cities Home Medical Equipment Co.

Based in Grand Prairie, Texas, Mid-Cities Home Medical Equipment
Co., Inc., a retailer of medical supplies and equipment, filed a
voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-41232)
on March 27, 2019.  At the time of filing, the Debtor had $500,000
to $1 million in estimated assets and $1 million to $10 million in
estimated liabilities.  The petition was signed by Scott Bays,
president.


MISTER CAR: Moody's Cuts CFR to B3 & Alters Outlook to Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Mister Car Wash Holdings,
Inc.'s Corporate Family Rating and Probability of Default Rating to
B3 and B3-PD respectively. In addition, Moody's assigned a B2
rating to the company's proposed senior secured first lien credit
facility, which includes a $75 million revolver, a $775 million
term loan, and a $40 million delayed draw term loan. The outlook
was changed to stable.

Proceeds from the proposed first lien term loan and $250 million
second lien term loan (unrated) will be used to refinance the
company's existing debt including its existing first lien credit
facility (rated B1) and pay a $215 million distribution to
shareholders. Upon the closing of the transaction, the rating of
the existing first lien credit facility will be withdrawn.

"While we view Mister Car Wash as a leading operator in the car
wash sub-segment, today's downgrade of the CFR and PDR reflects the
company's weak quantitative credit profile driven by its
debt-financed acquisition strategy, which is now exacerbated by
this substantial dividend to its sponsor/owners," stated Moody's
Vice President Charlie O'Shea. "Per Moody's estimates, which give
credit for run-rate EBITDA from recent acquisitions, this latest
dividend causes leverage on a pro forma basis at December 31, 2018
to land in the mid 8-times range, which is well-outside the
triggers set to maintain the B2 rating," continued O'Shea.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Mister Car Wash Holdings, Inc.

  Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to B3-PD from
  B2-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to B3 from B2

Assignments:

Issuer: Mister Car Wash Holdings, Inc.

  Gtd. Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned B2
  (LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Mister Car Wash Holdings, Inc.

  Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

Mister Car Wash's B3 Corporate Family Rating considers its
debt-financed acquisition strategy, which results in periodic
spikes in leverage, and its aggressive sponsor-driven financial
policy. Ratings also consider its solid operating performance
driven by consistent positive same store sales, its history of
successful growth through acquisitions, as well as the significant
portion of revenues generated from its unlimited wash subscription
business. In addition, the rating reflects the company's strong
market position in the largely fragmented car wash sub-segment,
which despite its limited scope is considered by Moody's to be an
asset given its strength in its chosen markets. With this
refinancing, liquidity is improved, with the upsized $75 million
revolver buttressed by the $40 million delayed draw term loan,
though Moody's notes that given the company's increased cash
requirements, particularly interest expense, the liquidity cushion
is marginal. Mister Car Wash's rating is constrained by its weak
credit metrics profile, with estimated pro-forma debt/EBITDA in the
mid 8-times range and EBIT/interest of 1.1 times for the twelve
months period ended December 2018, after giving credit for the
run-rate EBITDA from recent acquisitions.

The stable outlook reflects the company's strong operating
performance and the expectation that the company will continue
executing its acquisition strategy prudently with minimal
disruption both operationally and financially. The stable outlook
also reflects the expectation that leverage will decline towards
7.5 times in the next 12-18 months driven by continued earnings
growth and modest debt reduction. Ratings could be upgraded if on a
run-rate basis debt/EBITDA was sustained below 6.5 times, and
EBIT/interest was around 1.5 times. In addition, an upgrade would
require financial policies with respect to shareholder
distributions to become more predictable and the company to
maintain at least adequate liquidity. Ratings could be downgraded
if operating performance deteriorates or further debt-financed
shareholder distributions occur such that on a run-rate basis
debt/EBITDA is above 7.5 times and EBIT/interest falls below 1.0
times. In addition, ratings could be downgraded if liquidity
deteriorates for any reason.

Mister Car Wash, headquartered in Tucson, Arizona, is the largest
operator of car washes in North America, operating 300 car washes
and 32 lube locations across 21 U.S. states with FY 2018 revenue of
just over $500 million.


MUSCLEPHARM CORP: Hires Former General Electric Executive as COO
----------------------------------------------------------------
MusclePharm Corporation has appointed Alberto Andrade as the
Company's chief operating officer beginning on April 30, 2019.

Mr. Andrade joins MusclePharm from Juanita's Foods, the market
leader in Mexican canned foods where he was CFO and vice president
of Strategic Sourcing.  In this role, he successfully led numerous
business improvement initiatives resulting in multi-million-dollar
savings and operating efficiencies.  Mr. Andrade has held various
corporate leadership positions with General Electric, Spectrum
Brands, Home Depot and Anderson Seafoods.

Mr. Andrade brings with him the Fortune 50 sophistication, with the
practical hands-on leadership of smaller company environments
supported with an MBA (Finance), CPA, Certified Six Sigma Green
Belt and ISO-9000 certification.

"After an extensive executive search process, I couldn't be more
pleased with the appointment of Alberto as Chief Operating
Officer," said Ryan Drexler, chairman, CEO and president of
MusclePharm.  "With Alberto's 20+ years of strategic process
implementation, business optimization and cost efficiency
expertise, his addition will contribute significantly as
MusclePharm continues to position itself for sustainable and
profitable growth."

On April 10, 2019, the Company entered into an offer letter
agreement with Mr. Andrade.  Pursuant to the Offer Letter, Mr.
Andrade will report to Ryan Drexler, the Company's chief executive
officer and executive chairman of the Company's Board of Directors.
The Offer Letter does not provide for a specified term of
employment, and Mr. Andrade's employment will be on an at-will
basis and may be terminated by Mr. Andrade or by the Company at any
time, with or without cause.  Mr. Andrade will receive an annual
base salary of $350,000 and will be part of the Company's bonus
program with a yearly bonus potential of $245,000 based on the
achievement of mutually agreeable objectives to be determined by
Mr. Andrade and his supervisor.  Additionally, Mr. Andrade will
receive (i) a $30,000 one-time signing bonus, (ii) an extended stay
housing allowance of up to $2,000 per month for a period of six
months, (iii) a car allowance of $500 per month, (iv) reimbursement
for all eligible business travel expenses and (iv) if Mr. Andrade
is terminated without good cause for the benefit of the Company, a
severance package dependent on the length of employment at the time
of termination, as described in the Offer Letter.  Mr. Andrade will
also be eligible to participate in the Company's standard benefits
package, including a 401(k) retirement account and health, dental,
vision and life and disability insurance.

                      About MusclePharm

Headquartered in Denver, Colorado, MusclePharm Corporation
(OTCQB:MSLP) -- http://www.musclepharm.com/and
http://www.musclepharmcorp.com/-- develops, manufactures, markets
and distributes branded nutritional supplements.  Its portfolio of
recognized brands includes MusclePharm Sport Series, Essential
Series and FitMiss, as well as Natural Series, which was launched
in 2017.  These products are available in more than 100 countries
worldwide.  MusclePharm is an innovator in the sports nutrition
industry with clinically proven supplements that are developed
through a six-stage research process utilizing the expertise of
leading nutritional scientists, physicians and universities.

MusclePharm incurred a net loss of $10.97 million in 2017 compared
to a net loss of $3.47 million in 2016.  As of Sept. 30, 2018, the
Company had $28.34 million in total assets, $45.82 million in total
liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $17.47 million.


NANOMECH INC: May 6 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
--------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, United States Trustee, for Region 3, will hold an
organizational meeting on May 6, 2019, at 12:00 p.m. in the
bankruptcy case of NanoMech, Inc.

The meeting will be held at:

         Delaware State Bar Association
         405 King Street, 2nd Floor
         Wilmington, DE 19801

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it
represents.

                About NanoMech Inc.

NanoMech, Inc., an ISO 9001:2015 certified organization, is focused
on patented platform nanomanufacturing technologies.  It is a
privately held company formed in 2002.

NanoMech filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 19-10851) on April 15, 2019. In the petition signed by Benjamin
Waisbren, chief restructuring officer, the Debtor estimated $10
million to $50 million in both assets and liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Winston & Strawn LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; Gellert Scali Busenkell & Brown, LLC as bankruptcy
co-counsel; and Virtually There LLC as restructuring advisor. The
case has been assigned to Judge Christopher S. Sontchi.


NBM US: Fitch Rates Proposed 7-Year Senior Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'BB-' rating to NBM US Holdings,
Inc.'s proposed 7-year benchmark-sized senior unsecured notes. NBM
US Holdings is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marfrig Global food
S.A. The notes are also unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed
by Marfrig, MARB BondCo PLC, Marfrig Holdings (Europe) B.V. and
Marfrig Overseas Limited. The notes will be unsecured senior
obligations and will rank pari passu with all unsecured and
unsubordinated obligations of Marfrig and the subsidiaries
guarantors. The proceeds are expected to be used to refinance
existing indebtedness including existing notes due in 2021 and
2023.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Evolving Business Profile: Marfrig divested Keystone to Tyson
Foods, Inc (BBB/Stable) for a total enterprise value of USD2.4
billion at the end of 2018. The Keystone divestment came on the
heels of Marfrig's acquisition of 51% of National Beef Packing
Company, LLC for USD969 million in June 2018. Through these
transactions Marfrig has increased its exposure to beef, however,
some of the risks related to a single commodity are offset by the
lack of historical correlation between the U.S. and Brazilian
cattle cycles. Further, Marfrig will own 51% of much larger
National Beef versus 100% of Keystone, and although National Beef's
EBITDA will be consolidated 100%, there will be cash flow leakage
due to substantial minority interests. The impact of this leakage
on cash flow will be somewhat offset by lower capital expenditure
needs at National Beef.

Gradual Deleveraging: Fitch estimated that pro forma adjusted net
debt/ EBITDA (excluding minority dividends) was about 3.5x in 2018
compared to 5.1x as of fiscal year-end 2017 (FYE17). Fitch expects
Marfrig's net leverage to be below 3.5x in 2019 as a result of
improved EBITDA due to positive domestic consumption in the USA and
Brazil and the reopening of export markets. On February 8, 2019,
Uruguay and Japan entered into a sanitary agreement that authorized
exports of fresh beef between the two countries, which will benefit
Marfrig, as it is the largest beef exporter in Uruguay. The company
also made some bolt-on acquisitions in early 2019 which included
Quickfood in Argentina (USD54.9 million), Varzea Grande from BRF in
Brazil (BRL100 million) and Iowa Premium LLC (USD150 million) in
the US.

Product Concentration: While helping the company achieve its credit
leverage targets, the sale of Keystone increased the company's
product concentration and therefore business risk, as Keystone
provided relatively stable cash flow as most of its sales were
processed poultry products sold to McDonalds in the U.S.; the
company is now a pure beef player with a processing capacity of
33,500 head/day. National Beef is the fourth largest beef processor
in the United States with approximately 13% of the beef processing
capacity in the U.S. (12,000 head/day). In South America business,
Marfrig is one of the region's leading beef producers, with a
primary processing capacity of over 21,000 head/day.

Geographical diversification: Marfrig's ratings incorporate the
company's geographic diversification in the volatile protein
commodity industry. Fitch estimated that National Beef represented
about 60% of the group EBITDA and the remaining in South America
(mostly in Brazil). The geographic diversification helps to
decrease risks related to disease and currency fluctuation. In
addition, most of beef produced by National Beef is consumed in the
U.S. and a small part exported to Japan and South Korea, which
reduces the risks of tariffs and quotas faced by the company's
operations in South America.

Favorable Beef Outlook: Marfrig's competitive advantages stem from
a favorable environment to raise cattle in Brazil and the U.S., the
large scale of operations, access to exports markets from Brazil
and the U.S. and long-term relationship with farmers, customers,
and distributors. Global beef fundamentals are expected to remain
positive in the next couple years for Brazilian and U.S. producers
due to increased demand and better cattle availability. U.S. beef
production is forecast to grow by nearly 2% in 2019 according to
the USDA. In exports, Brazil and Argentina are poised to remain top
suppliers to China as the country makes a concerted effort to boost
its beef supplies as pork production will be hindered by disease
issues. Among the significant industry risks are a downturn in the
economy of a given export market, the imposition of increased
tariffs or sanitary barriers, and strikes or other events that may
affect the availability of ports and transportation.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Marfrig ratings reflect its solid business profile and geographic
diversification as a pure play in the beef industry with a large
presence in South America (notably Brazil) and in the U.S. with
National Beef. Marfrig is well positioned to compete in the global
protein industry due to its size and geographic diversification.
The business compares favorably regarding size with its regional
peer Minerva S.A. (BB-/Stable), which is mainly a beef processor in
South America. JBS S.A. (BB-/Stable) and Tyson Foods (BBB/Stable)
enjoy a higher level of scale of operations, stronger FCF, and
higher product and geographical diversification than Marfrig. JBS's
rating is constrained by ongoing litigation issues.

Regarding net leverage, Marfrig compares favorably to Minerva
(BB-). Marfrig's leverage is higher than Tyson's. Marfrig is
subject to a put option from minorities' shareholders. The put
option related to National Beef could be exercised in January 2023
(payable one-third each year). The put option would be accelerated
in the event of a change in control of Marfrig Global Foods S.A.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  - Sales are driven by positive consumer demand in the U.S. and
Brazil;

  - Bolt-on acquisitions

  - Adjusted Net debt/ EBITDA below 3.5x in 2019;

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- Sustainable and positive FCF;

  -- Improved and resilient operating margins in Marfrig Beef;

  -- Substantial decrease in gross and adjusted net Debt/ EBITDA
     (excl.dividends paid to minorities) to below 4.5x and 3.0x,
     respectively, on a sustained basis.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- Negative FCF on a sustained basis;

  -- Net leverage above 4.5x on a sustainable basis.

LIQUIDITY

Adequate Liquidity: As of Dec. 30, 2018, Marfrig had USD1.85
Billion of cash and cash equivalent compared to USD946 million of
short-term debt. The short-term debt is mainly related to the 2019
senior unsecured notes (USD0.5 billion) and trade finance lines.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch currently rates Marfrig as follows:

Marfrig Global Foods S.A.

  -- Long-Term Foreign and Local Currency IDR 'BB-';

  -- National Long-Term Rating 'A(bra)'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

Marfrig Holdings (Europe) B.V.

  -- Senior unsecured notes due 2019, 2021, 2023 'BB-'.

MARB BondCo PLC

  -- Senior unsecured notes due 2024 and 2025 'BB-'.

NBM US Holdings, Inc

Fitch has assigned a 'BB-' rating to the proposed senior unsecured
notes guaranteed by Marfrig Global Food S.A.


NEW START INCORPORATED: Hires Quintairos as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
A New Start Incorporated, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Florida to employ Quintairos
Prieto Wood & Boyer, P.A., as special counsel to the Debtor.

New Start Incorporated requires Quintairos to:

   (a) give advice and counsel to the Debtor with respect to
       legal strategy, settlement posture or as is otherwise
       needed in connection with the lawsuit;

   (b) prepare motions, pleadings, orders, applications, and
       other legal documents necessary in the case;

   (c) protect the interest of the Debtor in all matters pending
       before the court;

   (d) take any and all action necessary to adequately enforce
       and defend the rights of the estate insofar as it is
       connected to the pending litigation Living Tree
       Laboratories, LLC v. United Healthcare Service, Inc. et al
       (Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 1:16-cv-24680-
       DPG).

Quintairos will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates. The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Philip J. Kantor, partner of Quintairos Prieto Wood & Boyer, P.A.,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Quintairos can be reached at:

     Philip J. Kantor, Esq.
     QUINTAIROS PRIETO WOOD & BOYER, P.A.
     One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 1200
     Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
     Tel: (954) 523-7008

                  About A New Start Incorporated

A New Start Incorporated -- https://anewstartincfl.com/ -- is a
treatment center in Palm Beach County, Florida, providing
outpatient treatment for substance abuse and chemical dependency
disorders in adult clients.  An outpatient program allows clients
to continue working or attending school while receiving treatment
and support from the company's program and team of specialists.

A New Start Incorporated filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-13294) on March 14, 2019.  In the
petition signed by Eugene Sullivan, CEO, the Debtor estimated $1
million to $10 million in assets and $100,000 to $500,000 in
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Erik P. Kimball.
Angelo A. Gasparri, Esq., at Law Office Angelo A. Gasparri, is the
Debtor's counsel.




NORTHERN POWER: Disposes of US Service Business
-----------------------------------------------
Northern Power Systems Corp, through its wholly owned subsidiary,
Northern Power Systems, Inc., had executed an Asset Purchase
Agreement with Erie Renewables, Inc. pursuant to which Erie
acquired the assets relating to NPS's US Service Business.  At
closing, (i) Erie hired two NPS employees and (ii) NPS received
proceeds of approximately $230,000, subject to transactional
off-sets of $123,709.  In connection with this transaction, NPS
made a payment to Comerica of $106,290 leaving an aggregate amount
of $193,709 due and payable to Comerica by NPS under that certain
Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement by and between NPS
and Comerica dated Dec. 31, 2013 and as amended.  The Company is a
guarantor of NPS's obligations under the Loan.

In addition, on April 25, 2019, Richard Hokin, a member of the
Board of Directors of the Company provided the Board with a notice
of his resignation from the Board, effective immediately. Following
Mr. Hokin's resignation, the Company has a Board of Directors
consisting of one person.

On Feb. 7, 2019, NPS entered into the Second Amended and Restated
Forbearance Agreement by and between Comerica Bank and NPS, Inc. On
May 29, 2018, Comerica informed NPS that NPS was not currently in
compliance with two covenants under that certain Loan. Ultimately,
Comerica and NPS entered into (i) a Forbearance Agreement dated
Aug. 2, 2018 which the Company previously disclosed on a Form 8-K
dated Aug. 2, 2018 and an Amended and Restated Forbearance
Agreement dated Nov. 30, 2018 which the Company previously
disclosed on a Form 8-K dated Dec. 4, 2018. The Amended Forbearance
Agreement amends and restates the Forbearance Agreement.  As of
April 1, 2019, NPS is in breach of its obligations under the
Amended Forbearance Agreement and Comerica may immediately call the
Loan.  Further, Comerica has demanded NPS pay-off the Loan in its
entirety as of April 30, 2019.  NPS will be unable to fully
discharge its obligations to Comerica under the Loan by April 30,
2019.  However, in connection with the disposition of NPS's US
Service Business described in above, NPS did make a payment to
Comerica of $106,290 leaving an aggregate amount of $193,709 due
and payable to Comerica by NPS under the Loan.

Continued and prolonged cash constraints, the on-going breach of
the Amended Forbearance Agreement with Comerica, the current lack
of accessible commercial loans or other financing, and the
continued delay in the implementation of a new Feed in Tariff in
Italy with respect to distributed wind have significantly strained
the Company operationally, commercially and financially. Further,
the Company continues to explore all strategic alternatives and
transactions for Company, including the sale of the business or
some or all of its assets and business lines including its
distributed wind and Italian service business segments.

The Company said it is uncertain if its efforts (i) to address its
cash constraints and its legal difficulties with Comerica and/or
(ii) to effect one or more strategic transactions will be
successful.  Even if the Company is successful in identifying and
completing a strategic transaction, the likelihood of any economic
return to the equity owners of the Company at this point is
remote.

                 About Northern Power Systems

Northern Power Systems -- http://www.northernpower.com/-- designs,
manufactures, and sells distributed power generation and energy
storage solutions with its advanced wind turbines, inverters,
controls, and integration services.  With approximately 21 million
run-time hours across its global fleet, Northern Power wind
turbines provide customers with clean, cost-effective, reliable
renewable energy.  NPS turbines utilize patented permanent magnet
direct drive (PMDD) technology, which uses fewer moving parts,
delivers higher energy capture, and provides increased reliability
thanks to reduced maintenance and downtime.  Northern Power also
develops Energy Storage Solutions (ESS) based on the FlexPhase
power converter platform, which features patented converter
architecture and controls technology for advanced grid support and
generation applications.

Northern Power reported net income of $59,000 for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of $8.94 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Norther Power had $8.92
million in total assets, $13.90 million in total liabilities and a
total shareholders' deficiency of $4.97 million.

RSM US LLP, in Boston, Massachusetts, the Company's auditor since
2014, issued a "going concern" opinion in its report on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
citing that the Company has suffered recurring cash losses from
operations and its total liabilities exceed its total assets.  This
raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.


ORCHIDS PAPER: Orchids Investments Offers $176M for All Assets
--------------------------------------------------------------
Orchids Paper Products Co., and its debtor-affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to authorize the
bidding procedures in connection with the sale of substantially all
their assets to Orchids Investments, LLC for $175 million credit
bid, plus $500,000 cash, plus assumption of liabilities, subject to
overbid.

Concurrently with the filing of the Motion, the Debtors have
requested procedural consolidation and joint administration of the
Chapter 11 Cases pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 1015(b).  Subject to
their right to determine an alternative course of action is
preferable, the Debtors intend to sell the Assets in the Chapter 11
Cases and the DIP Lender and the Prepetition Secured Parties have,
subject to certain conditions, agreed to provide financing and to
allow their cash collateral to be used to fund the Chapter 11 Cases
and the potential sale.  However, given the Debtors' lack of
liquidity, they need to complete the sale process as expeditiously
as possible.

By the Motion, first the Debtors ask entry of the Bid Procedures
Order:

     (a) authorizing and approving the Bid Procedures attached to
the Bid Procedures Order as Exhibit 1 in connection with the sale
of substantially all of the Debtors' assets;

     (b) scheduling an auction and sale hearing with respect to the
Sale of the Assets;

     (c) approving the form and manner of notice of the Auction and
the Sale Hearing;

     (d) authorizing the Debtors to enter into (i) that certain
Asset Purchase Agreement with Orchids Investments, LLC, pursuant to
which the Stalking Horse Bidder seeks to purchase the Acquired
Assets from the Debtors pursuant to a credit bid and other
consideration as set forth therein and (ii) that certain Option
Agreement with the Stalking Horse Bidder, pursuant to which the
Stalking Horse Bidder granted the Debtors the option, but not the
obligation, to enter into the Stalking Horse Agreement in exchange
for certain bid protections;

     (e) approving certain bid protections as set forth in the
Option Agreement, consisting of: (i) a break-up fee equal to 3% of
the Purchase Price of $5.25 million; (iii) reimbursement of the
Stalking Horse Bidder's out of pocket costs, expenses, and fees
incurred in connection with evaluating, negotiating, documenting
and performing the transactions contemplated by the Option
Agreement and the Stalking Horse Agreement in an amount equal to
the lesser of (i) $2 million, and (ii) the aggregate amount of all
reasonable and documented out of pocket costs, expenses and fees
incurred by the Stalking Horse Bidder or those of the Stalking
Horse Bidder's subsidiaries that will receive title to any Acquired
Assets pursuant to the transactions contemplated by the Stalking
Horse Agreement; and (iii) an initial overbid of up to $7.75
million, consisting of the sum of the Break-Up Fee, the Expense
Reimbursement and $500,000.

     (f) approving procedures for the assumption and assignment of
certain executory contracts and unexpired leases in connection with
the Sale; and

     (g) granting related relief.

Second, the Debtors may ask entry of the Sale Order at the
conclusion of the Sale Hearing:

     (a) authorizing and approving the Sale of the Assets to the
Successful Bidder on the terms substantially set forth in the
Successful Bid free and clear of liens, claims, encumbrances, and
other interests other than Permitted Encumbrances and Assumed
Liabilities;

     (b) authorizing the assumption and assignment of the
Contracts; and

     (c) granting any related relief.

The Debtors reserve the right to file and serve any supplemental
pleading or declaration that the Debtors deem appropriate or
necessary in their reasonable business judgment, including any
pleading summarizing the competitive bidding and sale process and
the results thereof, in support of their request for entry of the
Sale Order before the Sale Hearing.

The key terms of the proposed transaction can be found in the
Stalking Horse Agreement, the salient terms of which are:

     a. Purchase Price: (a) Subject to the terms and conditions of
the Agreement, in consideration of the sale of the Acquired Assets
pursuant to the terms thereof, the Purchaser will (i) credit the
amount of principal due under the Loans due under the Prepetition
Credit Agreements, pursuant to a credit bid in the amount of $175
million, in its capacity as Prepetition Secured; and (ii) credit an
amount up to the amount outstanding under the DIP Facility at
Closing, pursuant to a credit bid by Purchaser in its capacity as
DIP Lender; provided, that the portion of the Loans that is not
credit bid as part of the Purchase Price will remain a Claim in the
Chapter 11 Cases, (iii) assume from the Sellers and become
obligated to pay, perform and discharge, when due, the Assumed
Liabilities, (iv) pay to the Sellers an amount of cash equal to the
amount outstanding under the DIP Facility at Closing (after taking
into account any credit bid); and (v) a cash payment to Orchids of
$500,000 at the Closing, which will be deposited into a segregated
Orchids bank account for distribution therefrom.

     b. Assumed Liabilities: The Purchaser will assume, and agree
to pay, perform, fulfill and discharge only the Assumed Liabilitie
of the Sellers.

     c. Sale Hearing: Not prior to June 12, 2019

     d. Closing: Aug. 16, 2019

     e. Relief from Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h): The Sale Order (i)
will have been entered by the Bankruptcy Court, and (ii) will not
have been appealed or be subject to any pending appeal as of the
Closing Date, and no stay with respect thereto (including any stay
under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h)) will be in effect as of the Closing
Date.

The Debtors believe a prompt sale of the Assets may represent the
best option available to maximize value for all stakeholders in
these Chapter 11 Cases.  Moreover, it is critical for them to
execute on any sale transaction as expeditiously as possible, as
the they are utilizing the DIP Lender's and the Prepetition Secured
Lender's cash collateral and additional financing in order to
explore the sale process.  Therefore, time is of the essence.

By the Motion, the Debtors ask the Court to approve the following
general timeline, with the assumption the Bankruptcy Court will
enter an order granting the Motion on shortened notice.  These
dates are subject to change in the event the Bankruptcy Court does
not
enter an order at that hearing:

     (a) Contract Cure Objection Deadline: Objections to the
potential assumption and assignment of any Contract, including
proposed cure amounts, will be filed and served no later than May
31, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

     (b) Bid Deadline: Bids for the Assets, including a marked-up
form of the Stalking Horse Agreement, as well as the deposit and
the other requirements for a bid to be considered a Qualified Bid
must be received by no later than June 6, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. (ET) or
such later date as may be agreed to by the Debtors.

     (c) Auction: The Auction, if necessary, will be held at the
offices of Polsinelli PC, 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1101,
Wilmington, Delaware 19801 on June 10, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (ET), or
such other location as identified by the Debtors after notice to
all Qualified Bidders.

     (d) Sale Objection Deadline: Objections to the Sale will be
filed and served no later than 4:00 p.m. (ET) on June 5, 2019.

     (e) Sale Hearing: Consistent with the Court's availability and
schedule, the Sale Hearing will commence on June 12, 2019.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: June 6, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. (ET)

     b. Initial Bid: Each Bid or combination of Bids must be for
all of the Assets and will clearly show the amount of the purchase
price.  In addition, a Bid or combination of Bids (a) must propose
a purchase price equal to or greater than the sum of (i) the value
of the Stalking Horse Agreement, as determined by the Debtors in
consultation with the Creditors' Committee; and (ii) an initial
overbid of up to $7.75 million, consisting of the sum of the
Break-Up Fee, the Expense Reimbursement and $500,000, and (b) must
obligate theBidder(s) to pay, to the extent provided in the
Agreement, all amounts which the Stalking Horse Bidder under the
Agreement has agreed to pay, including any assumed liabilities.

     c. Deposit: 7% of the Bid's proposed cash purchase price

     d. Auction: The Auction, if necessary, will be held at the
offices of Polsinelli PC, 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1101,
Wilmington, Delaware 19801 on June 10, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (ET), or
such other location as identified by the Debtors after notice to
all Qualified Bidders.

     e. Bid Increments: $500,000

A copy of the Bidding Procedures and APA attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Orchids_Paper_25_Sales.pdf

              About Orchids Paper Products Company

Headquartered in Pryor, Oklahoma, Orchids Paper Products Company
--
http://www.orchidspaper.com/-- is a national supplier of consumer

tissue products primarily serving the at home private label
consumer market.  The Company produces a full line of tissue
products, including paper towels, bathroom tissue and paper
napkins, to serve the value through ultra-premium quality market
segments from its operations in northeast Oklahoma, Barnwell,
South
Carolina and Mexicali, Mexico.  The Company provides these
products
primarily to retail chains throughout the United States.

Orchids Paper Products Company and two of its subsidiaries filed
for bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.Del., Lead Case No. 19-10729)
on April 1, 2019.  The petitions were signed by Richard S.
Infantino, interim chief strategy officer.  As of Feb. 28, 2019,
the Debtors posted total assets $322,061,000 and total debt of
$260,864,000.

Hon. Mary F. Walrath oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Polsinelli PC as counsel; Deloitte Transactions
And Business Analytics LLP as chief strategy officer; Houlihan
Lokey Capital, Inc., as investment banker; and Prime Clerk LLC as
claims and notice agent.



ORIGINCLEAR INC: Liggett & Webb, P.A. Raises Going Concern Doubt
----------------------------------------------------------------
OriginClear, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its annual report on Form 10-K, disclosing a net loss of
$11,346,569 on $4,637,698 of sales for the year ended Dec. 31,
2018, compared to a net loss of $5,231,805 on $3,355,632 of sales
for the year ended in 2017.

The audit report of Liggett & Webb, P.A., states that the Company
does not generate significant revenue, incurred a net loss and has
negative cash flows from operations.  This raises substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2018, showed total assets
of $1,359,605, total liabilities of $16,241,135, and a total
shareholders' deficit of $16,624,530.

A copy of the Form 10-K is available at:

                       https://is.gd/RFtuin

OriginClear, Inc., provides water treatment solutions.  The company
licenses its Electro Water Separation technology worldwide to treat
heavily polluted waters, as well as to remove harmful
micro-contaminants from drinking water using minimal energy,
chemicals, and materials.  It also designs and manufactures a line
of water treatment systems for municipal, industrial, and pure
water applications.  In addition, the company offers a range of
services, including maintenance contracts, retrofits, and
replacement assistance; and rents equipment through contracts of
varying duration, as well as provides prefabricated wastewater
treatment products.  It operates in the United States, Canada,
Japan, Argentina, and the Middle East.  The company was formerly
known as OriginOil, Inc. and changed its name to OriginClear, Inc.
in April 2015.  OriginClear was founded in 2007 and is
headquartered in Los Angeles, California.


PARTNERSHIPS TO UPLIFT: S&P Raises 2014A Rev. Bonds Rating to 'BB'
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its long-term rating on the California
School Finance Authority's series 2014A tax-exempt educational
facilities revenues bonds, issued for the Partnerships to Uplift
Communities (PUC), to 'BB' from 'BB-'. S&P also removed the rating
from CreditWatch, where it was placed with developing implications
on Jan. 20, 2019. The rating agency resolved the CreditWatch action
after receiving the required information. The outlook is stable.

The upgrade reflects a change in the application of the
group-rating methodology, published Nov. 19, 2013, on
RatingsDirect.

"In prior years, we viewed the 2014 obligated group's status as
highly strategic to the PUC organization as a whole," said S&P
credit analyst Luke Gildner. "In our opinion, the obligated group
size based on enrollment and assets is considered a significant
portion of the overall consolidated entity, and therefore qualifies
as core status. Therefore, the obligated group's final credit
rating is on par with the consolidated entity."

Financial metrics cited in the report (unless otherwise indicated)
reflect those of Partnerships to Uplift Communities Valley,
Partnerships to Uplift Communities Los Angeles, and Partnerships to
Uplift Communities Lakeview Terrace (PUC). The rating analysis
encompasses all schools in PUC Lakeview Terrace, PUC LA, and PUC
Valley, but does not include operations of PUC National (which
provides all the back-office services for the schools), nor PUC
Achieve in Rochester, N.Y. S&P understands PUC National and PUC
Achieve are separate entities with separate boards and audits, and
limited overlap in membership with other PUC entities. Effective
July 1, 2018, PUC Achieve was turned over to local control and is
no longer a PUC school. PUC National essentially operates as a
charter management organization to each PUC school and operates
under annual service agreements that are reviewed annually by each
PUC entity.

Revenue from three of PUC's 15 schools authorized under 12
petitions secures the 2014 bonds and include PUC Triumph Charter
Academy and High School, PUC Lakeview Charter High School, and PUC
Nueva Esperanza Charter Academy (2014 obligated group).

"We assessed PUC's enterprise profile as adequate, characterized by
its healthy enrollment size and growth, solid retention rates, and
diverse enrollment base with 15 schools in three regions in Los
Angeles. Recent enrollment declines due primarily to two school
closures constrains the enterprise profile assessment," S&P said.

"We assessed PUC's financial profile as vulnerable, characterized
by weak liquidity, and volatile financial performance. We believe
recent improvements in the organization's financial performance
will be difficult to sustain over the near term due to enrollment
declines in fiscal 2019," S&P said. Combined, these credit factors
lead to an indicative credit profile for PUC of 'bb' and a final
rating on the 2014 bonds of 'BB', according to the rating agency.


PASCO COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS: Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee, until further notice, will not appoint an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of
Pasco County Professional Firefighters Local 4420, according to
court dockets.
    
                  About Pasco County Professional
                      Firefighters Local 4420

Pasco County Professional Firefighters Local 4420 sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
19-02963) on April 1, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
had estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less
than $500,000.  

The case has been assigned to Judge Catherine Peek Mcewen.
ChildersLaw LLC is the Debtor's legal counsel.


PAUL F. SMITH: Taps Gary Cook as Bankruptcy Attorney
----------------------------------------------------
Paul F. Smith Jr., DDS, Inc., received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio to hire Gary
Cook, Esq. as its legal counsel.

Mr. Cook will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services in connection
with its Chapter 11 case.  

The Debtor will pay the attorney an hourly fee of $200.

Mr. Cook disclosed in court filings that he does not hold nor
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its bankruptcy
estate.

Mr. Cook maintains an office at:

     Gary Cook, Esq.
     23880  Commerce Park, Suite 2
     Beachwood, OH 44122
     Cell: 216-965-4410
     Email: gcookesq@yahoo.com

                 About Paul F. Smith, Jr. D.D.S.

Paul F. Smith, Jr. D.D.S., Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No. 19-11251) on
March 8, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated
assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $1
million.  The case is assigned to Judge Arthur I. Harris.  The
Debtor tapped Gary Cook, Esq., as its bankruptcy attorney.


PCI GAMING: Moody's Assigns First-Time Ba3 CFR, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a first-time Ba3 Corporate
Family Rating and a Ba3-PD Probability of Default Rating to PCI
Gaming Authority. Moody's also assigned a Ba3 rating to the
company's proposed $1.4 billion first lien bank credit facilities
consisting of a $100 million 5-year revolving credit facility and a
7-year $1.3 billion term loan. The outlook is stable. The ratings
are subject to receipt and review of final documentation.

Proceeds from the proposed $1.3 billion first lien term loan along
with $150 million of cash will be used to fund the $1.3 billion
purchase of the Sands Bethlehem casino property in Bethlehem, PA
and to pre-fund capital expenditures associated with development
and expansion of the property. PCI, d/b/a Wind Creek Hospitality,
is an unincorporated instrumentality of The Poarch Bank of Creek
Indians, the only federally recognized Indian Tribe in Alabama. The
Restricted Group includes the company's three facilities located in
Alabama and the to be acquired Sands Bethlehem located in
Pennsylvania.

"The Ba3 CFR reflects the high acquisition multiple paid for Sands
Bethlehem, small equity contribution relative to the purchase
price, and execution risk associated with PCI's entry into the
highly competitive Pennsylvania commercial gaming market, said
Moody's analyst Peggy Holloway. "PCI benefits from good liquidity,
solid interest coverage, and below average leverage," added
Holloway.

Assignments:

Issuer: PCI Gaming Authority

  Probability of Default Rating, Assigned Ba3-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Assigned Ba3

  Senior Secured Term Loan, Assigned Ba3 (LGD4)

  Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, Assigned Ba3 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: PCI Gaming Authority

  Outlook, Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

PCI's Ba3 Corporate Family Rating reflects the high multiple paid
(10.5x LTM EBITDA) for Sands Bethlehem, small equity contribution
supporting the purchase (11.3%), scale of the acquisition outside
of the company's core Alabama market, and execution risk. In
Alabama, only Class II gaming is allowed on Tribal lands, and so
PCI does not have a track record operating in a highly competitive
Class III gaming market such as Pennsylvania. After the
acquisition, PCI will remain geographically concentrated in Alabama
with more than 80% of pro-forma EBITDA generated by its three core
Alabama properties. Cash needs include priority distributions ($62
million) to the Tribe which can be paid during default. The terms
of the credit agreement also allows for additional distributions to
the Tribe subject maximum total net leverage ratio, as defined in
final documents. PCI benefits from a solid market position in the
Alabama gaming market with three properties located within driving
distance of the densely populated Atlanta, Birmingham, and/or
Mobile metro areas and limited competition. Positive consideration
is given to the company's good liquidity profile and conservative
credit metrics with pro-forma debt/EBITDA-priority distributions to
the Tribe of 2.6x and EBITDA-priority distributions/ interest
coverage around 6x. Additionally, PCI is expected to generate
around $300M in free cash flow after covering interest, capital
spending, mandatory amortization, and priority distributions. PCI
is likely to use the free cash flow for a combination of voluntary
debt repayment and discretionary Tribal distributions. The
Bethlehem casino's EBITDA will benefit modestly from PCI's plans to
expand the property's hotel room capacity and develop non-gaming
entertainment offerings.

Ratings consider risks unique to Native American gaming issuers,
which are largely a function of a tribe's status as a sovereign
entity and include: (1) the high degree of uncertainty regarding
the enforceability of claims; (2) the value of collateral; and (3)
the effectiveness of a tribe's waiver of sovereign immunity, which
if held to be ineffective, could prevent creditors from enforcing
their rights and remedies. Since PCI will own a commercial asset
located on non-tribal lands, the proposed term sheet includes a
provision that would require lenders to seek remedies against the
Tribe's commercial assets and forebear from exercising remedies
against Tribal gaming operations during a default or event of
default subject to paying interest, among other conditions.

PCI Gaming Authority d/b/a Wind Creek Hospitality is an
unincorporated instrumentality conducting gaming activities for the
Poarch Band of Creek Indians. Poarch Creek is the only federally
recognized Tribe in the state of Alabama and Wind Creek owns and
operates the only authorized gaming facilities in Alabama. The
company owns three locations in Montgomery, Wetumpka and Atmore all
located on Tribal Lands. These three facilities and Sands Bethlehem
comprise the restricted credit group. Estimated pro-forma revenues
of the Restricted Group is approximately $1.3 billion.


PETSMART INC: Moody's Alters Outlook on Caa1 CFR to Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service changed PetSmart, Inc.'s outlook to
stable from negative. Additionally, Moody's affirmed PetSmart's
Corporate Family Rating and Probability of Default rating at Caa1
and Caa1-PD, respectively. Moody's also affirmed the rating of its
senior secured term loan and senior secured notes at B3 and its
senior unsecured notes at Caa3.

"The stabilization of the outlook follows the recent amendment to
the company's senior secured credit facility which removes the
immediate risk of a distressed exchange and enhances the collateral
value for lenders which would have been diluted had PetSmart been
successful in its attempt to remove Chewy, Inc. as a guarantor
without this amendment", Moody's Vice President Mickey Chadha
stated. "We also expect credit metrics to improve in the next
twelve months as the topline and margins stabilize, the company
prepays $250 million of the term loan as required by the new
amendment, and uses proceeds from the comtemplated IPO of Chewy to
repay debt ", Chadha further stated.

Affirmations:

Issuer: PetSmart, Inc.

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Caa1

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Caa1-PD

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed
  B3 (LGD3)

  Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed
  B3 (LGD3)

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed
  Caa3 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: PetSmart, Inc.

  Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

PetSmart's credit profile (Caa1 stable) reflects the company's weak
credit metrics with lease adjusted debt/EBITDA of 8.2 times at
February 3, 2019 with modest deleveraging to about 7.5 times
expected over the next 12 months. Leverage was at 5.4 times prior
to the acquisition of Chewy in 2017. Moody's still believes the
acquisition of Chewy was a good strategic move by PetSmart as Chewy
has exponentially increased its revenues and online penetration.
However, as Chewy continues to grow its topline aggressively and
incur customer acquisition costs, Moody's expects its operating
losses to continue. More importantly, the increasingly competitive
business environment particularly from e-commerce and mass
retailers has led to increased promotional activity which has
negatively impacted PetSmart's top line and margins.

The rating also reflects PetSmart's position as the largest
specialty retailer of pet food, supplies and services in the U.S.,
with a well-known brand and broad national footprint. PetSmart's
sizeable services offering is a positive as it provides a
defensible market position and is less vulnerable to e-commerce.
The pet products industry in general remains relatively recession
resilient, driven by factors such as the replenishment nature of
consumables and services and increased pet ownership. The company's
credit profile is supported by its very good liquidity. The rating
also reflects concerns surrounding the private equity ownership
which gives rise to event risk surrounding shareholder-friendly
financial policies.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that credit metrics
will improve in the next 12 months and liquidity will remain very
good.

Sustained growth in revenue and profitability while demonstrating
conservative financial policies, including the use of free cash
flow for debt reduction, could lead to a ratings upgrade.
Quantitatively, ratings could be upgraded if the company
sustainably reduces debt/EBITDA to below 6.5 times and if
EBIT/interest expense approaches 1.25 times while maintaining good
overall liquidity.

PetSmart's ratings could be downgraded if same store sales trends
continue to deteriorate or if operating margins continue to erode,
indicating that the company's industry or competitive profile
continues to weaken. Ratings could also be downgraded if the
company's financial policies were to become more aggressive, such
as maintaining high leverage due to shareholder-friendly
activities. Quantitatively, a ratings downgrade could occur if
debt/EBITDA is sustained above 8.0 times or EBIT/interest is
sustained below 1.0 times.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail Industry
published in May 2018.

PetSmart, Inc. is the largest specialty retailer of supplies, food,
and services for household pets in the U.S. The company currently
operates close to 1,660 stores in the U.S. and Canada. Revenues
totaled 10.8 billion for fiscal year 2018. PetSmart also owns
Chewy, a leading online retailer of pet food and products in the
United States.


PHARMACYTE BIOTECH: Accumulated Deficit Raises Going Concern Doubt
------------------------------------------------------------------
PharmaCyte Biotech, Inc., filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $676,347 on $0 of revenue for the three
months ended Jan. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $2,030,660 on
$0 of revenue for the same period in 2018.

At Jan. 31, 2019 the Company had total assets of $5,836,938, total
liabilities of $471,243, and $5,365,695 in total stockholders'
equity.

As of Jan. 31, 2019, the Company has an accumulated deficit of
$98,892,427 and incurred a net loss for the nine months ended Jan.
31, 2019 of $2,928,284.  The Company requires substantial
additional capital to finance its planned business operations and
expects to incur operating losses in future periods due to the
expenses related to the Company's core businesses.  The Company has
not realized any revenue since it commenced doing business in the
biotechnology sector, and there can be no assurance that it will be
successful in generating revenues in the future in this sector.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.

For the nine months ended January 31, 2019, funding was provided by
investors to maintain and expand the Company's operations.  Sales
of the Company's common stock were made under the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 filed on September 13, 2017 ("S-3") allowing
for offerings of up to $50 million dollars in transactions that are
deemed to be "at the market offerings" as defined in Rule 415 under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Securities Act") or
transactions structured as a public offering of a distinct block or
blocks ("Block Trades") of the shares of the Company's common
stock.  During the nine-month period ending January 31, 2019, the
Company continued to acquire funds through the Company's S-3
pursuant to which the placement agent sells shares of common stock
in a program which is structured to provide up to $25 million
dollars to the Company less certain commissions.  From May 1, 2018
through January 31, 2019 the Company raised capital of
approximately $1.9 million in Block Trade transactions.  The
Company plans to continue selling securities using the S-3.  Also,
the Company has the ability to reduce the research and development
expenses significantly should further funding be delayed.

Management determined that these plans alleviate substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The
Company believes the cash on hand at January 31, 2019, the ability
to use the S-3 to raise capital through at-the-market sales and
Block Trades, sales of registered and unregistered shares of its
common stock and any public offerings of common stock in which the
Company may engage in will provide sufficient capital to meet the
Company's capital requirements and to fund the Company's operations
through March 30, 2020.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/nw1qZm

PharmaCyte Biotech, Inc., a clinical stage biotechnology company,
focuses on developing and commercializing cellular therapies for
cancer and diabetes in the United States.  The Company was formerly
known as Nuvilex, Inc., and changed its name to PharmaCyte Biotech
in January 2015.  PharmaCyte Biotech, Inc., was founded in 1996 and
is based in Laguna Hills, California.


PHOEBEN INC: $1.9M Sale of Substantially All Assets to Dothan OK'd
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jeffrey P. Norman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas authorized Phoeben, Inc.'s Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated as of Feb. 26, 2019, with Dothan Jewelry
Partners GP, LLC, in connection with the sale of substantially all
assets to Dothan Jewelry Partners GP, LLC for (i) a cash in the
amount of $1,902,000 and (ii) the Buyer's assumption of the Assumed
Liabilities.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances, and
interests of any kind or nature whatsoever, and all such liens,
claims, encumbrances, and interests will attach to the proceeds of
the Sale.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Order, the 2018 ad
valorem taxes owed by the Debtor to Harris County due in the amount
of $51,429 as of April 30, 2019, and any additional interest
thereon accrued through Closing will attach to the sale proceeds
and the Closing agent will pay the 2018 taxes immediately upon
closing and prior to any disbursement of proceeds to any other
person or entity.  The ad valorem taxes for the tax year 2019
pertaining to the Purchased Assets will become the responsibility
of the Buyer and the 2019 ad valorem tax liens will be retained
against the Purchased Assets until said taxes, including any
penalties and interest that may accrue, are paid in full.

Pursuant to Sections 105(a), 363, and 365 of the Bankruptcy Code,
the Debtor's assumption and assignment to the Buyer of the Assigned
Contracts is approved, and the requirements of Section 365(b)(1) of
the Bankruptcy Code with respect thereto are deemed satisfied.  
The Debtor will comply with its tax obligations under 28 U.S.C.
Section 960, except to the extent that such obligations are Assumed
Liabilities.

                      About Phoeben, Inc.

Based in Houston, Texas, Phoeben, Inc. --
https://www.armentacollection.com/ --  is manufacturer of
bracelets, rings, necklaces, enhancers, earrings, and handbags.

Phoeben, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case
No. 19-31000) on Feb. 26, 2019.  The case is assigned to Jeffrey P
Norman.  In the petition signed by CEO Emily Armenta, the Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities in the range of $1 million to $10
million.  The Debtor tapped Erin E. Jones, Esq., and Christopher R.
Murray, Esq., at Jones Murphy & Beatty LLP, as counsel.


PIONEER ENERGY: Incurs $15.1 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
--------------------------------------------------------------
Pioneer Energy Services Corp. has filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting
a net loss of $15.11 million on $146.56 million of revenues for the
three months ended March 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $11.13
million on $144.47 million of revenues for the three months ended
March 31, 2018.

As of March 31, 2019, the Company had $737.09 million in total
assets, $586.12 million in total liabilities, and $150.96 million
in total shareholders' equity.

The increase in revenues from the prior quarter was primarily due
to an increase across all of the Company's production services
segments as operators resumed operations after temporarily slowing
activity in the prior quarter as a result of lower commodity
prices.  Adjusted EBITDA decreased sequentially, primarily driven
by the change in fair value of the Company's phantom stock awards,
for which the Company recognized an expense of $0.8 million in the
first quarter, while it recognized a benefit of $2.8 million in the
prior quarter.  The impact of the phantom stock expense was
partially offset by improvement in both the coiled tubing and
domestic drilling segments as well as $1.1 million of gains from
the sale of certain assets, primarily spare coiled tubing
equipment.

                        Operating Results

Production Services Business

Revenue from the Company's production services business was $86.9
million in the first quarter, up 6% from the prior quarter.  Gross
margin as a percentage of revenue from the Company's production
services business was 20% in the first quarter, up from 19% in the
prior quarter.  Both revenue and margin were positively impacted in
all businesses as operators increased completion-related operations
after a brief pause in activity in the prior quarter given
instability in commodity prices.

The increase in production services revenues from the prior quarter
was attributable to improvements in all business segments, led by
coiled tubing which benefited from the addition of a large diameter
unit delivered late in the prior quarter. Wireline's
completion-related activity stabilized over the prior quarter and
well servicing gradually expanded its activity levels in both
remedial and completion-related activity.

Well servicing average revenue per hour was $558 in the first
quarter, down from $571 in the prior quarter, while rig utilization
was 54%, up from 50% in the prior quarter.  Coiled tubing revenue
days totaled 351 in the first quarter, as compared to 346 in the
prior quarter.  The number of wireline jobs completed in the first
quarter decreased by 3% sequentially.

Drilling Services Business

Revenue from the Company's drilling services business was $59.7
million in the first quarter, reflecting a 1% increase from the
prior quarter.  Average margin per day was $10,349, down from
$10,872 in the prior quarter.

The Company's domestic drilling fleet was fully contracted during
the current quarter and the prior quarter with average revenues per
day of $26,767 in the first quarter, up from $25,794 in the prior
quarter.  Domestic drilling average margin per day was $10,944 in
the first quarter, up from $10,252 in the prior quarter due to the
full impact of rate increases effective during the prior quarter as
well as a benefit of $0.3 million, or approximately $235 per day,
from recognition of the early termination of a domestic drilling
contract due to a customer's budget realignment, which had 34 days
remaining on its term. After contract termination, the drilling rig
mobilized from South Texas and resumed operations for a new client
in West Texas.

International drilling rig utilization was 81% for the first
quarter, up from 71% in the prior quarter.  Average revenues per
day were $37,316, down from $41,230 in the prior quarter, while
average margin per day for the first quarter was $8,894, down from
$12,590 in the prior quarter.  The decrease in revenue per day and
margin per day was primarily due to the benefit of revenue items
negotiated during the prior quarter and reversal of demobilization
revenue in the first quarter as a contract that was previously
expected to terminate was extended.

Currently, 16 of the Company's 17 domestic drilling rigs are
earning revenues, 13 of which are under term contracts, and seven
of its eight rigs in Colombia are earning revenue under daywork
contracts.

Comments from our President and CEO

"As oil prices have steadily improved in 2019 and customers have
resumed activity, we are seeing stable demand for our drilling and
production services," said Wm. Stacy Locke, president and chief
executive officer.  "We remain focused on achieving cash flow
neutrality in 2019 as our capital spending program was more heavily
weighted towards the first quarter, and our reduced spending
program for the remainder of 2019 is primarily for routine capital
expenditures.  Also, we experienced a longer collection cycle in
the first quarter, but we expect to improve our working capital
position as we move forward through 2019.

"In late March, we deployed our newest 1,500 horsepower,
super-spec, new-build drilling rig, which began operations in West
Texas on a three-year term contract.  We believe our premium rigs
are the best designed moving rigs in the market, helping customers
continue to improve efficiency.  By focusing on safety and
performance with superior equipment, we have been able to generate
industry-leading margins and have successfully extended the
contract terms on several of our rigs.  Our drilling services both
domestically and in Colombia are benefiting from stable dayrates,
extended contract coverage and solid customer demand.
Internationally, the market outlook is currently strong, and we are
having success extending contract coverage as our customers
continue to have robust drilling programs through 2019.

"Our production services business is experiencing healthy activity
levels, although weather conditions in the Rockies negatively
impacted our wireline business in February, and wildlife
restrictions will impact activity in the Rockies in April and May.
Customer demand for large diameter coiled tubing equipment
contributed to a 16% increase in that segment's revenue in the
first quarter as we benefited from the deployment of a large
diameter unit at the end of the prior quarter.  With commodity
prices continuing to firm up, we expect improved activity levels
for all business lines as we move through 2019."

Second Quarter 2019 Guidance

In the second quarter of 2019, revenue from our production services
business segments is expected to be up 1% to 4% as compared to the
first quarter of 2019.  Margin from the Company's production
services business is estimated to be 19% to 22% of revenue.
Domestic drilling services rig utilization is expected to be 93% to
95% as one rig will be idle during the second quarter as it
prepares to move to a new client in July, and
generate average margins per day of approximately $9,700 to
$10,200.  International drilling services rig utilization is
estimated to average 83% to 86%, and generate average margins per
day of approximately $8,500 to $9,500.
The Company expects general and administrative expense to be
approximately $20.0 million to $21.0 million in the second quarter
of 2019, which as it relates to phantom stock compensation expense,
is based on the closing price of the Company's common stock of
$1.77 per share at March 31, 2019.

Liquidity

Working capital at March 31, 2019 was $103.7 million, down from
$110.3 million at Dec. 31, 2018.  Cash and cash equivalents,
including restricted cash, were $27.9 million, down from $54.6
million at year-end 2018.  During the three months ended March 31,
2019, the Company used $16.8 million of cash for the purchase of
property and equipment, and our cash used in operations was $10.8
million.

Capital Expenditures

Cash capital expenditures during the three months ended March 31,
2019 were $16.8 million, including capitalized interest.  The
Company estimates total cash capital expenditures for 2019 to be
approximately $55 million to $60 million, which includes
approximately $7 million for final payments on the construction of
the new-build drilling rig that began operations in the first
quarter, and previous commitments on high-pressure pump packages
for coiled tubing completion operations.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/qDAtQL

                      About Pioneer Energy

Based in San Antonio, Texas, Pioneer Energy Services --
http://www.pioneeres.com/-- provides well servicing, wireline, and
coiled tubing services to producers in the U.S. Gulf Coast,
Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions through its three
production services business segments.  Pioneer also provides
contract land drilling services to oil and gas operators in Texas,
the Mid-Continent and Appalachian regions and internationally in
Colombia through its two drilling services business segments.

Pioneer Energy reported a net loss of $49.01 million on $590.09
million of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a
net loss of $75.11 million on $446.45 million of revenues for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, Pioneer Energy had
$741.55 million in total assets, $576.49 million in total
liabilities, and $165.05 million in total shareholders' equity.

                          *    *    *

Moody's Investors Service had upgraded Pioneer Energy Services'
Corporate Family Rating to 'Caa2' from 'Caa3'.  Moody's said that
Pioneer's 'Caa2' CFR reflects the company's elevated debt balance
pro forma for the $175 million senior secured term loan issuance.
Moody's said that while the company's operating cash flow is
expected to improve due to good demand for its drilling rigs and
equipment services, Pioneer Energy Services' leverage metrics are
weak, as reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Nov. 13,
2017.

As reported by the TCR on Jan. 25, 2019, S&P Global Ratings lowered
the issuer credit rating on Pioneer Energy Services Corp. to 'CCC+'
from 'B-'.  S&P said, "The downgrade on Pioneer Energy Services
Corp. primarily reflects what we believe to be increasing
refinancing risk, as well as subdued expectations for operating
results in 2019.


PLAINVILLE LIVESTOCK: James Overcash Named Chapter 11 Trustee
-------------------------------------------------------------
Robert E. Nugent of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Kansas approved the appointment of James A. Overcash as the Chapter
11 Trustee for Plainville Livestock Commission, Inc.

The approval was made following the United States Trustee’s
application for an order approving the appointment of James A.
Overcash for the Debtor.

           About Plainville Livestock Commission

Plainville Livestock Commission, Inc. operates a livestock auction
house in Kansas. It conducts a weekly cattle sale every Tuesday,
selling all classes of cattle.

Plainville Livestock Commission sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 19-10293) on March
1, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated
assets of less than $100,000 and liabilities of between $10 million
and $50 million.  

The case has been assigned to Judge Robert E. Nugent. Hinkle Law
Firm, LLC serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


PLAYPOWER INC: Moody's Cuts Ratings on 1st Lien Facilities to B3
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed PlayPower, Inc.'s B3 Corporate
Family Rating and B3-PD Probability of Default Rating. Moody's also
downgraded its senior secured first lien credit facilities ratings
to B3 from B2, and withdrew the rating on the previously proposed
second lien term loan. The outlook is stable.

This rating action follows PlayPower's revision to its proposed
capital structure which now includes only first lien debt and a
reduction in the proposed dividend. The proceeds from the new first
lien credit facilities will be used to refinance all of the
company's existing bank debt, fund a dividend to its private equity
owners and pay transaction-related fees. The ratings of the
existing first and second lien term loans and revolver will be
withdrawn upon completion of the refinancing.

The affirmation of the B3 CFR acknowledges that while PlayPower is
raising a lower level of debt, debt-to-EBITDA will remain high at
5.7x. The one notch downgrade of the senior secured first lien
credit facilities ratings to B3 reflects the company's revised
capital structure, which now proposes an all first lien bank debt
structure, and eliminates the loss absorption previously provided
by the senior secured second lien term loan. The first lien debt,
which includes a revolving credit facility and the upsized term
loan, will represent the preponderance of the company's obligations
following the proposed transaction.

Moody's took the following rating actions on PlayPower, Inc.:

Ratings Downgraded:

  Proposed Senior Secured First Lien Term Loan, to B3 (LGD4) from
  B2 (LGD3)

  Proposed Senior Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility,
  to B3 (LGD4) from B2 (LGD3)

Ratings Withdrawn:

  Previously Proposed Senior Secured Second Lien Term Loan,
  Caa2 (LGD5)

Ratings Affirmed:

  Corporate Family Rating, B3;

  Probability of Default Rating, B3-PD;

  Outlook, Remains Stable

All ratings and the outlook are subject to the execution of the
transaction as currently proposed and Moody's review of financial
documentation.

RATINGS RATIONALE

PlayPower's B3 CFR broadly reflects the cyclical nature of its
business as a manufacturer of commercial playground equipment,
indoor play systems, shade structures, and marine accessories.
PlayPower's products represent deferrable discretionary purchases
exposing the company to sharp declines in earnings and cash flow
during economic downturns. The rating also reflects an aggressive
financial policy under private equity ownership and high financial
leverage with pro forma debt to EBITDA of 5.7 times at December 31,
2018 (on Moody's adjusted basis). PlayPower's modest size limits
its negotiating power with raw material suppliers and increases its
operating risk due to its reliance on certain key manufacturing
facilities. The rating is supported by PlayPower's good market
position within its niche product lines. The rating also benefits
from company's good profit margins, as well as its wide geographic
presence within the United States and Europe.

Ratings could be upgraded if PlayPower effectively manages its
acquisition growth strategy, maintains stable operating
performance, and reduces financial leverage such that debt/EBITDA
is sustained below 5.0 times. An upgrade would also require the
company to demonstrate good liquidity in part supported by a
meaningful increase in free cash flow generation.

The ratings could be downgraded if revenues or margins materially
decline, liquidity deteriorates, including sustained negative cash
flow or a higher reliance on its revolving credit facility, or if
EBITA to interest approaches 1.25 times. The ratings could also be
downgraded if debt-to-EBITDA is sustained above 6.0 times.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Consumer
Durables Industry published in April 2017.

PlayPower, Inc. based in Huntersville, North Carolina, primarily
manufactures commercial playground equipment used in parks and
schools throughout North America and Europe. Commercial play
products account for over 70% of revenue. PlayPower also
manufactures shade structures that provide protection to people and
assets from the sun and weather, commercial indoor play systems,
site amenities, and marine accessories such as floating modular
dock systems and watercraft lifts. The company's primary markets
are North America and Europe, with some exposure to Asia and the
Middle East. PlayPower generated $503 million of revenue for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. PlayPower was acquired in June
2015 by private equity firm Littlejohn & Co., LLC.


POST PRODUCTION: Asks Court to Approve 1st Amended Plan Outline
---------------------------------------------------------------
Post Production, Inc. filed a motion asking the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California to approve its first
amended disclosure statement referring to its first amended plan of
reorganization.

The Debtor asserts that the disclosure statement meets the relevant
factors set forth in Metrocraft for adequacy of a disclosure
statement.

The disclosure statement provides a brief description of the
Debtor's assets and business and the proponents plan for them if
the plan is confirmed. Further details relating to the Debtor's
financial condition and post-confirmation operation of the Debtor
are found in sections X, XI, XII, XVI, and XV of the disclosure
statement.

                    About Post Production

Post Production, Inc. -- http://www.postproduction.com/-- is a
full-service post production company headquartered in Los Angeles,
California.  Formerly known as SonicPool, Post Production provides
industry professionals with services including editorial, color,
visual effects and digital delivery.  It also offers
post-production rentals and technology products.  The company was
founded in 2001 by John W. Frost and Patrick Bird.

Post Production sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-17028) on June 18,
2018.  In the petition signed by John Frost, president, the Debtor
disclosed $1.45 million in assets and $1 million in liabilities.
Judge Vincent P. Zurzolo oversees the case.  The Debtor tapped
Kogan Law Firm, APC, as its legal counsel.


PREFERRED CARE: Taps Daniel Sherman as Consultant
-------------------------------------------------
Preferred Care Partners Management Group, L.P., and Kentucky
Partners Management, LLC received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Texas to hire Daniel Sherman to
provide consulting services and expert testimony in their Chapter
11 cases.

Mr. Sherman will be paid an hourly fee of $545 for his services and
will receive reimbursement for work-related expenses.

In court filings, Mr. Sherman disclosed that he is a "disinterested
person" as defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Mr. Sherman maintains an office at:

     Daniel J. Sherman
     Sherman & Yaquinto, L.L.P.
     509 N. Montclair Ave.
     Dallas, TX 75208-5498
     Phone: 214-942-5502
     Email: Corky@syllp.com

                About Preferred Care Partners

Headquartered in Plano, Texas, Preferred Care Partners Management
Group and Kentucky Partners operate skilled nursing care
facilities.

Preferred Care Partners Management Group, L.P., and affiliate
Kentucky Partners Management, LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-34296 and 17-34297) on
Nov. 13, 2017.  Travis Eugene Lunceford, manager of general
partner, signed the petition.  The jointly administered cases were
later transferred to the Fort Worth Division and assigned Case No.
17-44741.

Mark Edward Andrews, Esq., Jane Anne Gerber, Esq., and Aaron
Michael Kaufman, Esq., at Dykema Cox Smith, serve as the Debtors'
bankruptcy counsel.

Preferred Care estimated its assets at between $50,000 and
$100,000, and its liabilities at between $10 million and $50
million.  Kentucky Partners estimated its assets at up to $50,000
and its liabilities at between $10 million and $50 million.


PTC INC: S&P Affirms 'BB' ICR; Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB' issuer credit rating on
U.S.-based industrial design and manufacturing software and
services provider PTC Inc. and its 'BB' issue-level rating on the
company's $500 million senior unsecured notes due May 15, 2024.

"The rating affirmation reflects our view that PTC Inc. will
maintain leverage well below 3x supported by good growth in core
product areas and increasing market penetration of its internet of
things (IoT) and augmented reality (AR) product offerings," S&P
said. The rating agency expects leverage to increase to about 2.5x
in fiscal year (FY) 2019 due to the acquisition of Frustum for
about $70 million in the first quarter funded by a revolving credit
facility (RCF) drawdown, as well as the impact on EBITDA margins
from $45 million-$50 million of restructuring and office relocation
costs.

S&P said that while these factors will cause leverage to increase
in the near term, it expects future EBITDA growth from good organic
revenue growth prospects, as well as margin expansion from an
increasing subscription revenue mix and reduced restructuring
charges. This should reduce leverage to 2x or below over the coming
12-24 months, according to the rating agency.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that PTC will make
sufficient investments in its salesforce and leverage its various
partnerships to grow bookings in the double-digit area over the
next 12-24 months. S&P expects this to result in at least
mid-single-digit revenue growth based on comparable revenue
accounting standards, and that increasing subscription revenues and
cost discipline will lead to EBITDA margins of at least 20% and
deleveraging to 2x or below.

"We could raise the rating if leverage improves to below 2x on a
sustained basis while EBITDA interest coverage remains above 6x.
This is combined with PTC maintaining a financial policy in line
with these metrics, even when accounting for shareholder returns
and strategic acquisitions," S&P said, adding that this could be
driven by expected revenue growth in the mid- to high-single-digit
area supported by continued strong growth in the IoT segment, and
improvement in EBITDA margins to at least around 25% helped by
operating leverage and lower restructuring expenses. Furthermore,
S&P said it would expect the company to only undertake tuck-in
acquisitions and a level of share repurchases that allow for
positive cash flow available for debt repayments.

"We could lower the rating if we expect PTC to sustain leverage at
above 3x. This could be due to weaker-than-expected revenue growth
from competitive pressures or prolonged sales execution issues, as
well as EBITDA margins of below 20%," S&P said, adding that this
could also be the result of large debt-funded acquisitions or more
aggressive shareholder returns.


PUC SCHOOLS, CA: S&P Affirms BB Bond Rating; Rating Off Watch Dev.
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings has affirmed its 'BB' long-term rating on the
California Municipal Finance Authority's series 2012A (tax-exempt)
and 2012B (taxable) charter school revenues bonds, issued for PUC
Schools. S&P also removed the rating from CreditWatch, where it was
placed with developing implications on Jan. 30, 2019. The rating
agency resolved the CreditWatch action after receiving the required
information from the school. The outlook is stable.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that operations will
be close to break-even on a full-accrual basis, resulting in
sufficient (relative to the debt covenant) lease-adjusted maximum
annual debt services coverage," said S&P credit analyst Luke
Gildner.

Revenue from four of PUC's 15 schools authorized under 12 petitions
secures the 2012 bonds and include PUC Community Charter Middle
School and PUC Community Charter Early College High School,
Lakeview Charter Academy, and California Academy for Liberal
Studies Charter Middle School and Early College High School (2012
obligated group).

Financial metrics cited in the report (unless otherwise indicated)
reflect those of Partnerships to Uplift Communities Valley,
Partnerships to Uplift Communities Los Angeles, and Partnerships to
Uplift Communities Lakeview Terrace (PUC). The rating analysis
encompasses all schools in PUC Lakeview Terrace, PUC LA, and PUC
Valley, but does not include operations of PUC National (which
provides all the back-office services for the schools), nor PUC
Achieve in Rochester, N.Y. S&P understands PUC National and PUC
Achieve are separate entities with separate boards and audits, and
limited overlap in membership with other PUC entities. Effective
July 1, 2018, PUC Achieve was turned over to local control and no
is no longer a PUC school. PUC National essentially operates as a
charter management organization to each PUC school and operates
under annual service agreements that are reviewed annually by each
PUC entity.

The rating is based on PUC's group credit profile (GCP) and S&P's
view that the obligated group supporting the 2012 bonds is core to
the entire PUC organization as the larger group, under S&P's Group
Rating Methodology published Nov. 19, 2013, on RatingsDirect. S&P
views the 2012 obligated group as important to the entire PUC
organization as the larger group, with support of the obligated
group being likely in the event of it having operating
difficulties. Its core status could change and will be evaluated as
the organization evolves. The rating applies only to the 2012 bonds
and not to the entire PUC organization as the larger group.

"We assessed PUC's enterprise profile as adequate, characterized by
its healthy enrollment size, solid retention rates, and diverse
enrollment base with 13 schools in three regions in Los Angeles.
Recent enrollment declines due primarily to two school closures
constrains the enterprise profile assessment," S&P said.

"We assessed PUC's financial profile as vulnerable, characterized
by a history of weak liquidity and variable financial performance.
We believe recent improvements in the organization's financial
performance will be difficult to sustain over the near term due to
enrollment declines in fiscal 2019," S&P said. Combined these
credit factors lead to an indicative credit profile for PUC of 'bb'
and a final rating on the 2012 bonds of 'BB', according to the
rating agency.


QUORUM HEALTH: Receives Noncompliance Notice from NYSE
------------------------------------------------------
Quorum Health Corporation was notified on April 30, 2019, by the
New York Stock Exchange, Inc. that it was not in compliance with
the NYSE's continued listing standards as a result of the Company's
average market capitalization being less than $50 million over a
consecutive 30 trading-day period and the most recently reported
stockholders' equity of the Company also being less than $50
million.  As set forth in the Notice, as of April 25, 2019, the
30-trading day average market capitalization of the Company was
approximately $44.0 million and the Company's last reported
stockholders' deficit as of Dec. 31, 2018 was approximately ($90.4)
million.

In accordance with the NYSE rules, the Company intends to notify
the NYSE within 10 business days of receipt of the Notice that the
Company intends to cure the deficiency.  Under the NYSE rules, the
Company has 45 days from the receipt of the Notice to submit a plan
advising the NYSE of definitive action the Company has taken, or is
taking, which would bring the Company into conformity with
continued listed standards within 18 months of receipt of the
Notice.  Within 45 days of receipt of the plan, the NYSE will make
a determination as to whether the Company has made a reasonable
demonstration of an ability to come into conformity with the
relevant standards in the 18 month period.  If the NYSE accepts the
plan, the Company's common stock will continue to be listed and
traded on the NYSE during the 18 month cure period, subject to the
Company's compliance with other continued listing standards, and
the Company will be subject to quarterly monitoring by the NYSE for
compliance with the plan.
The Company's common stock will continue to trade under the symbol
"QHC", but will have an added designation of ".BC" to indicate the
status of the common stock as being "below compliance".

The NYSE notification does not affect the Company's business
operations or its Securities and Exchange Commission reporting
requirements, nor does it conflict with or cause an event of
default under any of the Company's debt agreements.

                      About Quorum Health

Headquartered in Brentwood, Tennessee, Quorum Health --
http://www.quorumhealth.com/-- is an operator of general acute
care hospitals and outpatient services in the United States.
Through its subsidiaries, the Company owns, leases or operates a
diversified portfolio of 26 affiliated hospitals in rural and
mid-sized markets located across 14 states with an aggregate of
2,458 licensed beds.  The Company also operates Quorum Health
Resources, LLC, a leading hospital management advisory and
consulting services business.

Quorum Health incurred net losses attributable to the Company of
$200.24 million in 2018, $114.2 million in 2017, and $347.7 million
in 2016.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had $1.57 billion in
total assets, $1.64 billion in total liabilities, $2.27 million in
redeemable non-controlling interests, and a total deficit of $74.93
million.

                          *    *    *

In March 2019, S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating
on Brentwood, Tenn.-based Quorum Health Corp. to 'CCC+' from 'B-'.
"The downgrade reflects our decreased confidence in the company's
ability to successfully refinance its capital structure and achieve
material interest-cost savings given its weak operating trends and
our expectation that it may face some difficulty in divesting its
underperforming hospitals.  In our view, a failure to successfully
divest the mostly low-margin hospitals could make it significantly
more difficult for the company to refinance its capital structure,"
S&P said.


RUBIO & ASSOCIATES: U.S. Trustee Forms 4-Member Committee
---------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on May 1 appointed four creditors to
serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Chapter 11 case of Rubio & Associates LLC.

The committee members are:

     (1) Apex Pharmacy
         Attention: Jeff Brooks
         165 Ragland Road
         Beckley, WV 25801
         681-207-7334 (Phone)
         681-207-7338 (Fax)
         jbrooks@apexrx.biz

     (2) Cocca Development, Ltd.
         Attention: Anthony Cocca
         100 DeBartolo Place, Suite 400
         Boardman, OH 44512
         330-729-1010 (Phone)
         330-729-1008 (Fax)
         acocca@coccadevelopment.com

     (3) Martek Pharmacal
         Attention: Andrew E. Steck, Jr.
         575 Prospect Street #213
         Lakewood, NJ 08701
         201-264-2324 (Phone)
         732-905-7893 (Fax)
         info@martekpharmacal.com

     (4) John Mauer
         4232 Rhodes Avenue
         Studio City, CA 91604
         248-227-0193 (Phone)
         John.mauer@gmail.com

Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                    About Rubio & Associates LLC

Based in West Virginia, Rubio & Associates, LLC, which conducts
business under the name Imagine Medispa, provides medical weight
loss and skin care treatments.  The company opened its first
location in Beckley, W.Va. in August 1996.  Over the next 20 years,
the company opened five additional locations in Charleston (Imagine
Medispa - Charleston and Spa Bliss), Princeton, Ronceverte, and
Barboursville.  The company also offers non-surgical aesthetic skin
care and laser hair removal.  

Rubio & Associates sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Case No. 19-20148) on April 8,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $2,082,500
in assets and $965,000 in liabilities.   

The case has been assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk.  Kavitz Law PLLC
is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


S&S FOREST CITY: Seeks to Hire Jones & Walden as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&S Forest City NC, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Georgia to hire Jones & Walden,
LLC as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its rights and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; represent the Debtor with respect to a bankruptcy
plan; conduct examination; and provide other legal services in
connection with its Chapter 11 case.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Attorneys              $200 - $350
     Legal Assistants          $125

As of the petition date, Jones & Walden holds a retainer in the
amount of $22,017.

Cameron McCord, Esq., a partner at Jones & Walden, disclosed in
court filings that she and her firm neither hold nor represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estate.

Jones & Walden can be reached through:

     Cameron M. McCord, Esq.
     Jones & Walden, LLC
     21 Eighth Street, NE
     Atlanta, GA 30309
     Tel: (404) 564-9300
     Fax: (404) 564-9301
     Email: cmccord@joneswalden.com
            info@joneswalden.com

                     About S&S Forest City NC

S&S Forest City NC, LLC is a home health agency that provides
skilled nursing services and other therapeutic services.

S&S Forest City NC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-40886) on April 16,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of less than $50,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.
The case has been assigned to Judge Barbara Ellis-Monro.


SCHELL & KAMPETER: Filing of 3rd Amended Classick Suit Due May 7
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, RICHARD DAVID CLASSICK, JR. Individually and on Behalf
of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. SCHELL & KAMPETER,
INC. d/b/a DIAMOND PET FOODS, and DIAMOND PET FOODS INC.,
Defendants, Case No. 2:18-cv-02344-JAM-AC (E.D. Cal.), Judge John
A. Mendez of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
California has issued an order setting (i) deadline to file the
Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, and (ii) the briefing schedule
of the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Third Amended
Complaint.

On Oct. 18, 2018, the Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Class
Action Complaint.  On Nov. 20, 2018, the Defendant filed a Motion
to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint.  On Dec. 20, 2018,
the Plaintiffs filed their Opposition to Defendant's Motion to
Dismiss.

On Jan, 15, 2019, the Defendant filed a Reply Brief in support of
its Motion to Dismiss.  On March 21, 2019, the Court issued an
order granting in part and denying in part the Defendant's Motion
to Dismiss.

The Plaintiff's current deadline to file a Third Amended Complaint
is April 9, 2019, and the Defendant's responsive pleading is due on
April 29, 2019.  The Parties' current deadline to hold a discovery
conference is April 11, 2019.

The Counsel for Parties conferred regarding a briefing schedule for
the Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's Third
Amended Complaint.

The Parties agreed and stipulated, and Judge Mendez approved, as
follows:

     a. The Defendant's deadline to file and serve its Motion to
Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint is continued from April
29, 2019 to May 7, 2019;

     b. The Plaintiff will file and serve an opposition to the
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on May 30, 2019;

     c. The Defendant will file and serve its reply in support of
its Motion to Dismiss on June 13, 2019; and

     d. The Parties must conduct a discovery conference by May 11,
2019.

A full-text copy of the Court's April 10, 2019 Order is available
at https://is.gd/rKnLxQ from Leagle.com.

Richard David Classick, Jr., Plaintiff, represented by Rebecca A.
Peterson -- rapeterson@locklaw.com -- Lockridge Grindal Nauen
P.L.L.P., Robert K. Shelquist, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P. &
Steven M. McKany -- smckany@robbinsarroyo.com -- Robbins Arroyo
LLP.

Schell & Kampeter, Inc., also known as Diamond Pet Foods & Diamond
Pet Foods Inc., Defendants, represented by Amir M. Nassihi , Shook,
Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., Emily M. Weissenberger , Shook Hardy & Bacon
& Steven D. Soden -- ssoden@shb.com -- Shook, Hardy and Bacon
L.L.P, pro hac vice.



SIMKAR LLC: Sandeep Gupta Appointed Chapter 11 Trustee
------------------------------------------------------
William K. Harrington, the United States Trustee for Region 2,
asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New
York to enter an order approving the appointment of Sandeep Gupta
as the Chapter 11 Trustee for SIMKAR LLC.

The appointment of Sandeep Gupta was made following the U.S.
Trustee's consultation with Bruce Bronson, Esq., proposed counsel
to the Debtor; Jonathan L. Flaxer, Esq., proposed counsel to the
Committee; and Joseph Corneau, Esq., counsel for Capstone Credit,
LCC and Capstone Capital Group LLC, regarding the appointment of
the Chapter 11 Trustee.

Meanwhile, Sandeep Gupta disclosed that he is a disinterested
person within the meaning of and eligible and competent to perform
the duties of a Trustee for the Debtor.

                 About Simkar, LLC

Based in Tarrytown, New York, SIMKAR LLC -- http://www.simkar.com
-- is an internationally known designer, developer, and
manufacturer of lighting products.  Since 1952, the Company has
provided a diverse selection of high-quality LED lighting fixtures,
along with other technologies to contractors, specifiers, and other
strategic partners.  The Company designs and manufactures lighting
fixtures at its 283,500 square foot manufacturing facility in
Philadelphia, PA.

SIMKAR LLC filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case No. 19-22576) on March 6, 2019.  The Debtor's counsel is H.
Bruce Bronson, Jr., Esq., in Harrison, New York.

At the time of filing, the Debtor had estimated assets and
estimated liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.

The petition was signed by Alfred Heyer, Neo Lights Holdings Inc.,
president of managing member.


SIZMEK INC: Taps FTI Capital Advisors as Financial Advisor
----------------------------------------------------------
Sizmek Inc. received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York to hire FTI Capital Advisors,
LLC.

The firm will provide financial advisory and investment banking
services in connection with a possible merger, consolidation, sale
or similar transaction involving all or a substantial portion of
the business, assets and equity interest of the company and its
affiliates.

FTI will be paid a monthly fee of $175,000 for its services.  

In the event that the Debtors close on one or more transactions
either during the term or within 12 months following the
termination or expiration of the term of the firm's employment,
then FTICA will earn a "success fee" equal to 2% of the "aggregate
value" of each transaction.  The minimum success fee is $1.5
million and is payable in cash on the date of the closing of each
transaction.

Prior to their bankruptcy filing, the Debtors paid FTI a retainer
in the amount of $175,000.  

Glenn Tobias, chief executive officer of FTI, disclosed in court
filings that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

FTI can be reached through:

     Glenn Tobias
     FTI Capital Advisors, LLC
     Three Times Square, 9th Floor
     New York, NY, 10036
     Phone: +1 212 247 1010
     Fax: +1 212 841 9350
     Email: glenn.tobias@fticonsulting.com

                        About Sizmek Inc.

Sizmek Inc. is an online advertising campaign management and
distribution platform for advertisers, media agencies, and
publishers.

Sizmek and its affiliates filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 19-10971) on March 29, 2019.  At the
time of the filing, Sizmek estimated assets of between $100 million
and $500 million and liabilities of between $100 million and $500
million.  

Judge Stuart M. Bernstein oversees the cases.  

The Debtors tapped Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP as their legal
counsel; FTI Consulting Inc. as financial advisor; and Stretto as
claims and noticing agent.


SIZMEK INC: Taps Muchin Rosenman as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
Sizmek Inc. received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York to hire Katten Muchin Rosenman
LLP as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the company and its affiliates of their powers
and duties under the Bankruptcy Code; represent them in negotiation
with their creditors; give advice concerning the sale of their
assets; prepare a bankruptcy plan; and provide other legal services
in connection with their Chapter 11 cases.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Partners               $720 - $1,430
     Of Counsel             $850 - $1,405
     Associates             $395 - $930
     Paraprofessionals      $185 - $545

Steven Reisman, Esq., at Katten Muchin, disclosed in court filings
that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases, Mr.
Reisman disclosed that his firm has not agreed to a variation of
its standard billing arrangements for its employment with the
Debtors, and that no Katten professional has varied his rate based
on the geographic location of the Debtors' bankruptcy cases.

The attorney further disclosed that his firm did not represent the
Debtors in the 12-month period prior to the petition date.

Mr. Reisman also disclosed that the Debtors have already approved
the firm's budget and staffing plan for the period March 31 to
April 23.

Katten can be reached through:

     Steven J. Reisman, Esq.
     Cindi M. Giglio, Esq.
     Jerry L. Hall, Esq.
     Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
     575 Madison Avenue
     New York, NY 10022
     Telephone: (212) 940-8800  
     Facsimile: (212) 940-8876
     Email: sreisman@kattenlaw.com
     Email: cindi.giglio@kattenlaw.com
     Email: jerry.hall@kattenlaw.com
  
          -- and --

     Peter A. Siddiqui, Esq.
     Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
     525 W. Monroe Street  
     Chicago, IL 60661
     Telephone: (312) 902-5455
     Facsimile: (312) 902-1061
     Email: peter.siddiqui@kattenlaw.com

                        About Sizmek Inc.

Sizmek Inc. is an online advertising campaign management and
distribution platform for advertisers, media agencies, and
publishers.

Sizmek and its affiliates filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 19-10971) on March 29, 2019.  At the
time of the filing, Sizmek estimated assets of between $100 million
and $500 million and liabilities of between $100 million and $500
million.  

Judge Stuart M. Bernstein oversees the cases.  

The Debtors tapped Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP as their legal
counsel; FTI Consulting Inc. as financial advisor; and Stretto as
claims and noticing agent.


SOUTH MOON BBQ: Seeks to Hire Barrick Switzer as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
South Moon BBQ Incorporated seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Illinois to hire Barrick,
Switzer, Long, Balsley, & Van Evera LLP as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services in connection
with its Chapter 11 case.

James Stevens, Esq., the firm's attorney who will be handling the
case, charges an hourly fee of $300.  The retainer fee is $5,000.

Mr. Stevens disclosed in court filings that all members and
employees of his firm are "disinterested" as defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Barrick can be reached through:

     James E. Stevens, Esq.
     Barrick, Switzer, Long, Balsley, & Van Evera LLP
     6833 Stalter Drive
     Rockford, IL 61108
     Phone: (815) 962.6611
     Fax: (815) 962.0687
     E-mail: jimstevens@bslbv.com

                    About South Moon BBQ Inc

South Moon BBQ Incorporated sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 19-80759) on April
1, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $1 million.  The
case is assigned to Judge Thomas M. Lynch.  Barrick, Switzer, Long,
Balsley, & Van Evera LLP is the Debtor's counsel.


STRAIGHT UP: Taps Winegarden Haley as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
Straight Up Enterprises, Inc., received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to hire
Winegarden, Haley, Lindholm Tucker & Himelhoch, P.L.C. as its legal
counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services in connection
with its Chapter 11 case.

Winegarden holds a retainer in the sum of $29,300.

The firm can be reached through:

     Dennis M. Haley, Esq.
     Winegarden, Haley, Lindholm Tucker
     & Himelhoch, P.L.C.
     G-9460 S. Saginaw Street, Suite A
     Grand Blanc, MI 48439
     Tel: (810) 579-3600
     Email: ecf@winegarden-law.com

                  About Straight Up Enterprises

Straight Up Enterprises, Inc., is a retailer of sports apparel and
other miscellaneous sports gear and accessories.  Straight Up
Enterprises sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 19-31010) on April 23, 2019.  At
the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $1,985,246 in assets
and $5,557,303 in liabilities.  The case has been assigned to Judge
Daniel S. Opperman.


SUNGARD AVAILABILITY: Case Summary & 30 Top Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: Sungard Availability Services Capital, Inc.
             50 Main Street, Suite 1014
             White Plains, NY 10606

Business Description: Sungard Services Capital, Inc., together
                      with its debtor and non-debtor subsidiaries,
                      is a provider of information technology
                      production and recovery services for
                      companies in the financial services,
                      manufacturing, retail, healthcare,
                      business services, transportation,
                      telecommunications, utilities, and
                      government sectors across North America,
                      Europe, and India.  The Debtors' core
                      business segments involve providing
                      managed information technology, information
                      availability consulting, business continuity
                      management software, and disaster recovery
                      services.  The Debtors and their non-Debtor
                      affiliates own and/or operate over 80 data
                      centers and recovery locations worldwide,
                      and provide services to approximately 3,250
                      customers in nine countries with
                      approximately 2,500 employees.  The Debtors
                      are headquartered in Wayne, Pennsylvania,
                      and have corporate offices in the United
                      Kingdom, Canada, Ireland, France, India,
                      Belgium, Luxembourg, and Poland.
                      Visit www.sungardas.com for more
                      information.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of New York (White Plains)

Seven affiliates that filed voluntary petitions seeking relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

      Debtor                                          Case No.
      ------                                          --------
      Sungard Availability Services, LP               19-22914
      Sungard Availability Services Capital, Inc.     19-22915
      Sungard Availability Services Holdings, LLC     19-22916
      Sungard Availability Services Technology, LLC   19-22917
      Inflow LLC                                      19-22918
      Sungard Availability Services VeriCenter, Inc.  19-22919
      Sungard Availability Network Solutions Inc.     19-22920

Judge: Hon. Robert D. Drain

Debtors' Counsel: Jonathan S. Henes, P.C.
                  Emily E. Geier, Esq.
                  KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
                  KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
                  601 Lexington Avenue
                  New York, New York 10022
                  Tel: (212) 446-4800
                  Fax: (212) 446-4900
                  Email: jonathan.henes@kirkland.com
                         emily.geier@kirkland.com

                    - and -

                  Ryan Blaine Bennett, P.C.
                  KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
                  KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
                  300 North LaSalle Street
                  Chicago, Illinois 60654
                  Tel: (312) 862-2000
                  Fax: (312) 862-2200
                  Email: ryan.bennett@kirkland.com

Debtors'
Restructuring
Advisor:          ALIXPARTNERS, LLP

Debtors'
Financial
Advisor and
Investment
Banker:           CENTERVIEW PARTNERS LLC

Debtors'
Notice and
Claims Agent:     PRIME CLERK, LLC
                  https://cases.primeclerk.com/sungardASballots

Estimated Assets
(on a consolidated basis): $100 million to $500 million

Estimated Liabilities
(on a consolidated basis): $1 billion to $10 billion

The petition was signed by Eric S. Koza, chief restructuring
officer.

A full-text copy of Sungard Availability Services Capital's
petition is available for free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb19-22915.pdf

Consolidated List of Debtors' 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Gartner Inc.                         Trade           $2,560,792
P.O. Box 911319
Dallas, TX 75391

2. Dell Marketing L.P.                  Trade           $1,528,643
Attn: Scott Minor
One Dell Way
Mail Stop 8129
Round Rock, TX 78682
Tel: 1-610-608-4212
Tel: Scott.Minor@dell.com

3. Element Critical                     Trade           $1,102,258

4. Veritas Technologies LLC             Trade             $783,310
Attn: Don Harrison
500 East Middlefield Road
Mountain View, CA 94043
Tel: (856) 372 – 0360
Email: Donald.Harrison@veritas.com

5. Mulesoft, Inc.                       Trade             $640,286
77 Geary Street, St 400
San Francisco, CA 94108

6. Russo Family Limited Partnership     Trade             $299,840
P.O. Box 15012
Newark, NJ 07191

7. Intech Construction, Inc.            Trade             $240,211
Attn: Ron Podlesny
3020 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Tel: 215-243-4957
Email: RPodlesny@intechconstruction.com

8. 410 Commerce LLC                     Trade             $225,912
71 Hudson St
Hackensack, NJ 07601

9. Access IT Group, Inc                 Trade             $215,427
Attn: Mark Spencer
2000 Valley Forge Circle, Suite 106
King of Prussia, PA 19406
Tel: 610-783-5200 x204
Email: marks@accessitgroup.com

10. Curvature, Inc.                     Trade             $206,705
Attn: Ari Fischbein
10420,Harris Oaks Blvd, Suite C
Charlotte NC 28269
Tel: 516.351.0520
Email: AFischbein@curvature.com

11. G4S Secure Solutions (USEA) Inc.    Trade             $182,840
Attn: James Kimmel
1395 University Blvd.
Jupiter, FL 33458
Tel: 646-895-3902
Email: james.kimmel@usa.g4s.com

12. 1500 Net-WORKS Associates, L.P.     Trade             $163,991
c/o Nightingale Realty, LLC
1430 Broadway, Suite 1605
New York, NY 10018

13. Oracle America, Inc.                Trade             $157,881
Attn: Katrina Gody
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel: 1(888)545-4577
Email: katrina.gody@oracle.com

14. Microland, Limited                  Trade             $148,773
Attn: Deepanjan Biswas
1B Ecospace, Bellandur
Outer Ring Road
Bangalore, India 560103
Tel: +44-7725257948
Email: DeepanjanB@microland.com

15. D&B                                 Trade             $148,630
P.O. Box 75434
Chicago, IL 60675

16. The Collective Group, LLC           Trade             $134,062
9433 Bee Caves Road
Building III, Suite 200
Austin, TX 78733

17. Xactly Corporation                  Trade             $131,032
Dept CH 16399
Palatine, IL 60055

18. Nexii Labs Inc.                     Trade             $126,368
Attn: Srini Unnava
2050 Brunswick Plaza-1
State Highway 27, Suite#201
North Brunswick, NJ-08902
Tel: 91-9848361224
Email: srini.unnava@nexiilabs.com

19. 760 Washington Avenue LLC           Trade             $121,346
71 Hudson Street
Hackensack, NJ 07601

20. Cisco Systems, Inc.                 Trade             $117,299
PO Box 742927
Los Angeles, CA 90074

21. Haynes Mechanical Systems Inc.      Trade              $86,190
Attn: Scott Day
5654 Greenwood Plaza Blvd
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
Tel: 303-710-6531
Email: sday@haynesmechanical.com

22. DLA Piper LLP (US)               Professional          $82,832
PO Box 75190                           Services
Baltimore, MD 21275

23. ABB. Inc.                           Trade              $80,155
305 Gregson Drive
Cary, NC 27511

24. Iron Mountain Off-Site Data         Trade              $71,753
Protection
P.O. Box 915026
Dallas, TX 75391

25. McCollister's Transportation Group  Trade              $67,040
PO Box 37794
Baltimore, MD 21297

26. Cannella Roofing Inc.               Trade              $65,500
783 Market Street
Paterson, NJ 07513

27. VSS LLC                             Trade              $64,130
201 E Baltimore St., Suite 1400
Baltimore, MD 21202

28. FIS Avantgard LLC                   Trade              $64,015
PO Box 40949
Jacksonville, FL 32203

29. EMC Corporation                     Trade              $63,289
Attn: Lucien Shelton
176 South Street
Hopkinton, MA 01748
Tel: 303-601-3133
Email: lucien.shelton@dell.com

30. Parkway Corporation                 Trade              $60,274
150 N. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19102


SUNGARD AVAILABILITY: Moody's Cuts PDR to D-PD Amid Bankr. Filing
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Sungard Availability Services
Capital Inc.'s probability of default rating to D-PD from Ca-PD/LD
following the announcement that the company voluntarily filed a
petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy
Code on May 1, 2019. Sungard AS's corporate family rating was
affirmed at Ca, its senior secured bank credit facility rating was
affirmed at Caa3, and its unsecured rating was affirmed at C.

Subsequent to its actions, Moody's will withdraw the ratings due to
Sungard AS's bankruptcy filing.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Sungard Availability Services Capital Inc.

  Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to D-PD from Ca-PD/LD

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Sungard Availability Services Capital Inc.

  Outlook, Remains Negative

Affirmations:

Issuer: Sungard Availability Services Capital Inc.

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ca

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Caa3 (LGD3)

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed C (LGD5)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The downgrade of the PDR reflects Sungard AS's bankruptcy filing on
May 1, 2019. The Ca CFR, Caa3 senior secured and C unsecured
ratings reflect Moody's view of estimated recovery. Under the
prepackaged plan of reorganization, the company's funded debt
obligations would decline by more than $900 million, and annual
cash interest payments would decline by about $100 million.

Sungard Availability Services Capital Inc. is a provider of
disaster recovery services and managed IT services.


SYNIVERSE HOLDINGS: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B-' on Elevated Leverage
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered all of its ratings on U.S.-based
Syniverse Holdings Inc. by one notch, including its issuer credit
rating, to 'B-' from 'B'.

The downgrade reflects the challenges Syniverse is facing as it
attempts to grow its revenue and EBITDA amid industry pressures
arising from shifts in mobile technology and the proliferation of
over-the-top (OTT) messaging apps, which will likely constrain any
meaningful leverage improvement. As a result, S&P expects adjusted
debt to EBITDA to remain above 7x over the next year.

The stable outlook on Syniverse reflects S&P's expectation that the
company's adjusted leverage will remain in the low 7x area over the
next year as modest EBITDA declines driven by reductions in higher
margin legacy roaming and P2P messaging revenue is offset by a
moderate level of required debt repayment.

"We could lower our rating on Syniverse if its operating
performance is materially weaker than we expect because of lower
growth in its strategic products, such as A2P messaging and
LTE-based solutions, which leads to a sharp decline in its FOCF and
weaker liquidity," S&P said, adding that it could also lower the
rating if the company's financial commitments appear unsustainable
over the long term.

"Although unlikely in the near term, we could raise our rating on
Syniverse if it replaces its lost roaming and messaging revenue
with revenue from profitable new business such that its total
revenue consistently increases and it sustains margins in the
mid-to-high 30% area while correspondingly lowering its leverage
below 6.5x," S&P said. Given its private-equity ownership, an
upgrade would require Syniverse's owners to maintain financial
policies that allow the company to sustain leverage of comfortably
below 6.5x, according to the rating agency.


TELESCOPE MANAGEMENT: SBFC Objects to Plan, Disclosures
-------------------------------------------------------
Small Business Financial Solutions, LLC, objects to the First
Amended Chapter 11 Plan and Amended Disclosure Statement filed by
Telescope Management Group, LLC, complaining that the Plan pursuant
to 11 U.S.C. Section 1129(b)(2)(B) on the basis that the current
proposed Plan is not fair and equitable and violates the absolutely
priority rule.

According to Creditor, the proposed Plan impairs the claims of
SBFC, and SBFC does not consent to the treatment.

Attorney for SBFC:

     Amy P. Hunt, Esq.
     Horack, Talley, Pharr & Lowndes, P.A.
     2600 One Wells Fargo Center
     301 S. College St.
     Charlotte, NC 28202-6006
     Telephone: (704) 377-2500
     Facsimile: (704) 714-7935
     Email: ahunt@horacktalley.com

Based in Morrisville, North Carolina, Telescope Management Group,
LLC, dba Bevello, a privately held company in the management
services business, filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
E.D.N.C. Case No. 18-04012) on August 10, 2018.  The case is
assigned to Hon. David M. Warren.  The Debtor is represented by
William P. Janvier, Esq., in Raleigh, North Carolina.

At the time of filing, the Debtor had estimated assets and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.


THE9 LIMITED: Grant Thornton Raises Going Concern Doubt
-------------------------------------------------------
The9 Limited filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
its annual report on Form 20-F, disclosing a net loss of
RMB239,284,796 on RMB17,492,415 of revenues for the year ended Dec.
31, 2018, compared to a net loss of RMB112,092,907 on RMB73,208,166
of revenues for the year ended in 2017.

The audit report of Grant Thornton states that the Group has an
accumulated deficit of approximately RMB3,233.1 million (US$470.2
million) as of December 31, 2018, and incurred a net loss of
approximately RMB239.3 million (US$34.8 million) for the year ended
December 31, 2018.  These conditions, along with other matters,
raise substantial doubt about the Group's ability to continue as a
going concern.

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2018, showed total assets
of RMB164,687,440, total liabilities of RMB908,423,767, and
RMB1,084,810,866 in total shareholders' deficit.

A copy of the Form 20-F is available at:

                       https://is.gd/cnxx6N

The9 Limited, together with its subsidiaries, operates as an online
game developer and operator in the People's Republic of China. The
company offers online games, including massively multiplayer online
games, mobile games, Web games, and TV games. It also provides
training services, such as smartphone application programming
training services to college students. The company was formerly
known as GameNow.net Limited and changed its name to The9 Limited
in February 2004. The9 Limited was founded in 1999 and is
headquartered in Shanghai, the People's Republic of China.


THOMSON-SHORE INC: Taps Eby Conner as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Thomson-Shore, Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to hire Eby Conner
Smillie & Bourque, PLLC.

The firm will serve as special counsel to the Debtor in connection
with the sale of its operating assets and will assist its
management with other business law matters.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Senior Attorneys     $300
     Paralegals            $50

Eby Conner received an initial retainer in the amount of $15,000.

Mark Eby, Esq., at Eby Conner, disclosed in court filings that all
personnel of the firm are "disinterested" as defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Mark J. Eby, Esq.
     Eby Conner Smillie & Bourque, PLLC
     301 N. Main Street, Suite 250
     Ann Arbor, MI 48104
     Phone: (734) 769-2691
     E-mail: mark.eby@eecsb.com
            Eby@ecsblaw.com

                      About Thomson-Shore

Thomson-Shore, Inc. -- https://thomsonshore.com/ -- is a 100
percent employee-owned full service book manufacturing, printing,
publishing, production and distribution company.  It specializes in
fulfilling the needs of book publishers, from an author's initial
Word document to the end reader.  Its business solutions span the
entire publishing supply chain.  Thomson-Shore was founded in 1972
and is located in Dexter, Mich.

Thomson-Shore sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 19-44343) on March 25, 2019.  At
the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $14,454,993 in assets
and $11,622,522 in liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge
Thomas J. Tucker.  Eby Conner Smillie & Bourque, PLLC, is the
Debtor's counsel.



THOMSON-SHORE INC: Taps Goldstein Bershad as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Thomson-Shore, Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to hire Goldstein
Bershad & Fried PC as its legal counsel.

The firm will provide legal services in connection with the
Debtor's Chapter 11 case, which include the preparation of its
bankruptcy plan, negotiation with creditors, and advising the
Debtor concerning the sale of its assets.

The firm's hourly rates are:

         Senior Attorneys     $400
         Paralegals            $75

Goldstein received an initial retainer in the amount of $51,717, of
which $46,779.50 was used to pay its pre-bankruptcy services.

Aaron Scheinfield, Esq., at Goldstein, disclosed in court filings
that all personnel of the firm are "disinterested" as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Aaron J. Scheinfield, Esq.
     Goldstein Bershad & Fried PC
     4000 Town Center, Suite 1200
     Southfield, MI 48075
     Tel: (248) 355-5300
     Fax: (248) 355-4644
     Email: aaron@bk-lawyer.net

                      About Thomson-Shore

Thomson-Shore, Inc. -- https://www.thomsonshore.com/ -- is a 100
percent employee-owned full service book manufacturing, printing,
publishing, production and distribution company.  It specializes in
fulfilling the needs of book publishers, from an author's initial
Word document to the end reader.  Its business solutions span the
entire publishing supply chain.  Thomson-Shore was founded in 1972
and is located in Dexter, Mich.

Thomson-Shore sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 19-44343) on March 25, 2019.  At
the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $14,454,993 in assets
and $11,622,522 in liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge
Thomas J. Tucker.


TOPAZ SOLAR: Fitch Affirms C Rating on $1.1BB Senior Secured Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Topaz Solar Farms, LLC's $1.100 billion
($908.5 million outstanding) senior secured notes at 'C'.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Summary: The rating reflects Topaz's exposure to a bankrupt utility
counterparty, Pacific Gas & Electric, for all of its revenue under
a long-term power purchase agreement. Fitch expects Topaz can
continue making its scheduled debt service payments as long as PG&E
continues paying the project under the current terms of the PPA.
PG&E may seek to terminate the PPA or weaken its terms materially
during the bankruptcy resolution process. Topaz's operational
performance has exceeded the base case forecasts for over four
years of commercial operating history and exhibits healthy
financial metrics, with modest leverage and strengthening debt
service coverage ratios. Metrics are consistent with the 'A'
category, but the project rating is constrained by the offtaker.

Stable Contracted Revenues - Revenue Risk (Price): Stronger (was
Weaker)

The fixed-price, 25-year PPA with PG&E extends one month beyond
debt maturity. The PPA provides reimbursement for curtailment
directed by the utility. This structure is consistent with a
stronger assessment under Fitch's current criteria (earlier
criteria incorporated the revenue counterparty credit quality in
this key rating driver).

Solid Solar Resource - Revenue Risk (Volume): Midrange

Total generation output in Fitch's rating case is based on a
one-year P90 estimate of electric generation to mitigate the
potential for lower-than-expected solar resource. The project can
meet debt obligations under a one-year P99 generation scenario in
all years.

Proven Technology and Experienced Operator - Operation Risk:
Midrange

Thin-film photovoltaic technology has a long operating history,
which mitigates plant performance risks. First Solar, as the plant
operator, has a track record of high plant availability. Long-term
agreements support routine and unscheduled maintenance needs.
Fitch's financial analysis incorporates operating cost increases to
mitigate unforeseen events including the risk of contractor
replacement.

Conventional Debt Structure - Debt Structure: Stronger

The senior-ranking, fully amortizing, fixed-rate debt benefits from
a six-month debt service reserve backed by a letter of credit and
strong 1.20x forward and backward looking debt service coverage
equity distribution test.

Financial Profile

Base case DSCR average is 1.83x with a minimum of 1.67x. Fitch's
rating case includes stresses that increase expenses and reduce
energy output, resulting in an average DSCR of 1.60x with a minimum
of 1.50x. In both scenarios, annual DSCRs generally increase over
time, reflecting increasing ability to withstand additional
stresses.

PEER GROUP

Topaz's average rating case DSCR is above Fitch's indicative
coverage guidance of 1.40x for an 'A-' rating and higher than Solar
Star Funding, LLC (BBB-/Rating Watch Negative), which has an
average rating case DSCR of 1.37x. Similarly rated projects include
a privately rated PV project that also demonstrates strong
operating history and high projected DSCRs but is constrained by
the same offtaker.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action:

  -- Modification or rejection of the PPA resulting in a material
     adverse effect upon projected cash flows leading to a default
     on the project's debt repayment obligations.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action:

  -- High confidence that PG&E will continue to make PPA payments
     sufficient to meet the project's debt repayment obligations.

CREDIT UPDATE

Performance Update

Topaz continues to display a very stable profile to date. In 2018,
actual output was 109% above the sponsor's P50 forecast and 21%
above Fitch's rating case. Plant effective availability was also
strong at 99.7% (compared to Fitch's base case estimate of 97%).
The energy lost due to maintenance events and soiling did not
impact operations significantly. PG&E-requested curtailment totaled
approximately 13,900 MWh in 2018, down from 62,000 MWh last year.
All curtailed generation is paid for by PG&E as per the terms of
the PPA. Sponsor does not know exact reasons for curtailment but
suspects it occurs when PG&E is trying to balance the system when
demand is low and solar production is high. Year-to-date 2019
availability is lower than last year at 98% due to rain in
California holding back generation and some maintenance issues,
however generation is still in line with budget.

2018 revenues grew by 3% to $220 million vs. $213 million in 2017
due to an 4% increase in power generation (including compensated
curtailents), and operating expenses fell 2%. Work orders, while
numerous, are appropriate for a project this size (approximately
3,000 acres). Cash flow available for debt service increased 8% in
2018. DSCR grew in 2018 to 2.01x vs. 1.85x in 2017 as the project
benefited from slightly lower debt service and higher revenues
during the period. 2018 results beat budget estimates with 11%
higher revenues than budgeted, 10% lower opex and 13% higher CFADS.
DSCR was subsequently stronger than predicted at 2.01x vs. a budget
of 1.78x. Management also notes that contracted O&M fees with First
Solar were renegotiated in 2018, and costs will go down by about
50% starting late 2019.

PG&E filed for bankruptcy protection on Jan. 29, 2019, and Fitch
downgraded PG&E to 'D' on Jan. 30, 2019. According to management,
PG&E has been current on all payments with the exception of the
payment for pre-petition January deliveries and certain
reimbursements under the interconnection agreements. PG&E is
precluded from paying pre-petition amounts post-petition without
bankruptcy court approval. Topaz filed a 503(b)(9) claim to have
energy deliveries for January 9th-28th treated as an administrative
expense. If unsuccessful in pursuing the 503(b)(9) claim, Topaz
will have an unsecured claim in the PG&E bankruptcy for the $10.3
million of unpaid revenues and $2.8 million, for unpaid
reimbursements under the interconnection agreements.

Fitch Cases

Fitch's base case utilizes the P50 electric generation estimate,
97% availability, 0.9% annual panel degradation, a 2% energy output
reduction, and a 2.5% inflation assumption. The resulting profile
produces an average DSCR of 1.83x and a minimum of 1.67x.

Fitch's rating case utilizes the same degradation, output
reduction, and inflation assumptions but further sensitizes
performance using the one-year P90 and a 10%-15% increase in costs.
The resulting profile produces an average DSCR of 1.60x and a
minimum of 1.50x.

The minimum and average rating case metrics are well above the
minimum threshold for investment grade. Moreover, annual DSCRs are
projected to increase over time, providing a greater cushion on
debt repayment during the outer years, when financial performance
is less certain.

Asset Description

Topaz is a 550-MW AC solar PV facility operating on 4,900
project-owned acres in San Luis Obispo County, California. Topaz
employs PV modules designed and manufactured by First Solar using
commercially proven thin-film cadmium telluride PV cell technology
mounted at a fixed tilt of 25-degrees with no tracking risks.


TRIBUNE CO: Court Bars Fraudulent Transfer Claims v. Shareholders
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Michael L. Cook. Esq., of Schulte Roth & Zabel, disclosed that the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, on April
23, 2019, denied the litigation trustee's motion for leave to file
a sixth amended complaint that would have asserted constructive
fraudulent transfer claims against 5,000 Tribune Company
("Tribune") shareholders.  In re Tribune Co. Fraudulent Conveyance
Litigation, 2019 WL 1771786 (S.D.N.Y. April 23, 2019).  The safe
harbor of Bankruptcy Code ("Code") Sec. 546(e) barred the trustee's
proposed claims, held the court. Id., at * 12.  Based on undisputed
facts, it reasoned that the debtor, Tribune, "was a 'customer' of
CTC" [Computershare Trust Company N.A.]; CTC was "acting as
Tribune's 'agent or custodian'. . . 'in connection with a
securities contract'"; and that both entities were a "financial
institution" as defined by the Code. Id., at * 9.  Also, held the
court, "at this stage of the litigation," allowing the trustee to
amend his complaint "would result in undue prejudice to the
[defendant] Shareholders." Id., at * 12.

This decision means, as a practical matter, that (a) the trustee
cannot assert federal constructive fraudulent transfer claims
against the shareholders; (b) the court has now resolved all of the
trustee's other claims in the action; and that (c) separate
individual creditor suits asserting state law constructive
fraudulent transfer claims will also probably be barred.  In any
event, the court has now effectively dismissed all of the trustee's
claims against the shareholder defendants.

Relevance
Code Sec. 546(e), the so-called "safe harbor" defense, "shields
from [a bankruptcy trustee's] avoidance proceedings [e.g.,
fraudulent transfer, preferential transfers]" based on "transfers
by or to financial intermediaries effectuating settlement payments
in securities transactions or made in connection with a securities
contract, except through an intentional fraudulent [transfer]
claim." In re Tribune Co. Fraudulent Conveyance Litigation, 818,
F.3d 98, 105 (2d Cir. 2016).

Section 546(e) "is a very broadly-worded safe harbor provision that
was enacted to minimize the displacement caused in the commodities
and securities markets in the event of a major bankruptcy affecting
those industries." In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC, 773 F.3d
411, 416 (2d Cir. 2014) (citation omitted).  "The safe harbor
limits this risk by prohibiting the avoidance of 'settlement
payments' made by, to, or on behalf of a number of participants in
the financial markets." Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. v. Alfa,
S.A.B. de C.V., 651 F.3d 329, 334 (2d Cir. 2011). Accord, Peterson
v. Somers Dublin Ltd., 729 F.3d 741, 748 (7th Cir. 2013); Grede v.
FC Stone, LLC, 746 F.3d 244, 252 (7th Cir. 2014).

The Tribune trustee relied on the Feb. 27, 2018 decision of the
U.S. Supreme Court in Merit Management GRP, LP v. FTI Consulting,
Inc., 138 S. Ct. 883, 893 (2018), which held that "the relevant
transfer for purposes of Sec.546(e) safe-harbor inquiry is the
overarching transfer," rejecting the argument that a bank or trust
company acting as a "mere conduit" can be sufficient ground to
invoke the safe harbor provision.  According to the trustee,
"reading the [Code's] definition of "financial institution" to
cover an entity like Tribune would [also] run counter to the spirit
of the Supreme Court's decision in Merit Management. . . .  " 2019
WL 1771786, at * 12.

Facts
The suit against Tribune shareholders arose out of a 2007 leveraged
buyout ("LBO") of Tribune. As part of the LBO, Tribune purchased
its outstanding stock from the defendant shareholders for about $8
billion.  It first sent to CTC, which had agreed to act as
"Depository," the required cash to repurchase its shares as part of
a tender offer.  CTC received tendered shares on Tribune's behalf,
paying out $34 per share to the tendering shareholders.  When the
tender offer was oversubscribed, Tribune repurchased more shares,
engaging CTC as an "Exchange Agent" to perform essentially the same
function as before.

The bankruptcy court confirmed Tribune's reorganization plan in
2012.  That plan transferred the claims asserted here to a
litigation trust after several rounds of litigation begun by the
trust's predecessor, the Tribune creditors' committee.  The
district court consolidated about 40 state law actions against the
shareholders across the country.  After several rounds of
litigation, in separate actions brought by Tribune's creditors with
bankruptcy court permission, the Second Circuit held that
individual creditors' "state law, constructive fraudulent
[transfer] claims . . . are pre-empted by . . . Code Section
546(e)." 818 F.3d at 105. In response to the creditors' petition
for certiorari, the Supreme Court deferred its consideration of the
petition to "allow the [Second Circuit] or the District Court to
consider whether to recall the [Second Circuit's] mandate,
entertain a . . . motion to vacate the earlier judgment, or provide
any other available relief in light of [the Supreme Court's]
decision in Merit Management." Deutsche Bank TR. Co. Americas v.
Robert R. McCormick Found., 138 S. Ct. 1162, 1162-63 (2018).

The district court later resolved all outstanding motions in the
trustee's litigation and dismissed claims against various remaining
defendants.  After noting settlements with other defendants, the
district court here was left with "only the Trustee's request to
amend" his complaint to add constructive fraudulent transfer claims
under Code Sec. 548(a)(1)(B) against former Tribune shareholders.
2019 WL 1771786, at * 4.

Analysis
The court rejected the defendants' arguments based on judicial
estoppel, bad faith, undue delay by the trustee and the statute of
limitations. Id., at * 5-* 6.  As noted earlier, though, it found
that "[s]tanding alone, undue prejudice to the shareholders
provides a sufficient basis upon which to deny the Trustee's
motion" to add the constructive fraudulent transfer claim. Id., at
* 6.  More significant, the court held that the "Trustee's proposed
amendment would be futile because his [federal constructive
fraudulent transfer claims] are barred by Section 546(e)
notwithstanding the Supreme Court's holding in Merit Management."
Id., at * 7.  The relevant language in Sec. 546(e), said the court,
"bars a Trustee from asserting a claim for constructive fraudulent
[transfer] with respect to a 'settlement payment . . . made by . .
. [a] financial institution [or] financial participant' or 'a
transfer made by . . . [a] financial institution [or] financial
participant . . . in connection with a securities contract . . . .'
Id.

The parties agreed that the transfers here were "settlement
payments" and in connection with a securities contract and that the
transfers were made "by" Tribune. Id. at * 8.  They disagreed,
though, as to whether Tribune was an entity covered by Code Sec.
546(e), namely, that it was "either a financial institution or a
financial participant." Id.  Because a financial participant had to
be "an entity" that "entered into a covered transaction with "the
debtor or any other entity," Tribune, the debtor, could not fall
within the definition of "financial participant," held the court.
Id., at * 9.

But the court found Tribune to be a "customer" of CTC. Although the
court did not define the term, the court relied on current
dictionary definitions of "customer" as "a buyer or purchaser of
goods or services" and "a person having an account with a bank or
for whom a bank has agreed to collect items." Id., at * 9, quoting
Black's Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014).

"Tribune was CTC's customer in connection with the LBO transactions
at issue here," found the court. Id., at * 10. Rejecting the
trustee's reliance on the narrow definitions of "customer" in the
Code's sub-chapter that deals with stockbroker and commodity broker
liquidations, these limited definitions, said the court, did not
apply here. The "transactions addressed in Section 546(e) are not
so limited and the express disclaimer of a limited definition is
both appropriate and understandable." Id., at * 10.

CTC was also Tribune's "agent." Id. Code Sec. 101(22)'(s)
definition of "financial institution" includes an agent.  "CTC was
entrusted with billions of dollars of Tribune cash and was tasked
with making payments on Tribune's behalf to Shareholders upon the
tender of their stock certificates to CTC. . . . [—] a
paradigmatic principal-agent relationship." Id., at * 11.

Finally, ruled the court, "CTC acted 'in connection with a
securities contract.'" Id.  Because Tribune used CTC to repurchase
Tribune stock from Shareholders at both steps of the LBO, that fact
confirmed "CTC's involvement in these LBO transactions . . .' was
in connection with a securities contract,'" consistent with Sec.
546(e). Id.

The court rejected the trustee's argument based on the "independent
legal significance doctrine" to call the LBO a "merger." Id.
According to the court, the LBO was "a securities transaction" and
the trustee was "not free to define the transfer it seeks to avoid
in any way it chooses." Id., quoting Merit Management, 138 S.Ct.
1894.

Most important, the court stressed that the Supreme Court in Merit
Management had "specifically declined to address the scope of the
definition of 'financial institution,'" and had declined to
"address what impact, if any, Sec. 101(22)(A) would have in the
application of the Sec. 546(e) safe harbor." Id., at * 12, quoting
Merit Management, 138 Ct. at 890 n.2. Because the "text of Section
101(22)(A) compels a conclusion that Tribune itself was a
'financial institution,' it "would be futile" to allow the trustee
to assert federal constructive fraudulent transfer claims. Id., at
* 12.

Comment
The court's ruling "is consistent with Section 546(e)'s goal of
promoting stability and finality in securities markets and
protecting investors from claims precisely like" those sought to be
asserted by the trustee here. Id.  Although the trustee argued that
Tribune was not a "systemically important" institution, the court
stressed that Tribune had been "a publicly traded, Fortune 500
company" and that the trustee had sued "over 5,000 Shareholders of
Tribune." Id.  The shareholders' "only involvement in this
transaction was receiving payment for their shares." Id. On these
facts, the trustee's attempt "to unwind securities transactions" of
this kind "is precisely the sort of risk that Section 546(e)" was
intended to minimize." Id.

                       About Tribune Co.

Chicago, Illinois-based Tribune Co. -- http://www.tribune.com/--
and 110 of its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 08-13141) on Dec. 8, 2008.  The Debtors
proposed Sidley Austin LLP as their counsel; Cole, Schotz, Meisel,
Forman & Leonard, PA, as Delaware counsel; Lazard Ltd. and Alvarez
& Marsal North America LLC as financial advisors; and Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions LLC as claims agent.  As of Dec. 8, 2008, the
Debtors listed $7,604,195,000 in total assets and $12,972,541,148
in total debts.  Chadbourne & Parke LLP and Landis Rath LLP served
as co-counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.
AlixPartners LLP served as the Committee's financial advisor.
Landis Rath Moelis & Company served as the Committee's investment
banker.  Thomas G. Macauley, Esq., at Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, in
Wilmington, Delaware, represented the Committee in connection with
the lawsuit filed against former officers and shareholders for the
2007 LBO of Tribune.

Protracted negotiations and mediation efforts and numerous proposed
plans of reorganization filed by Tribune Co. and competing creditor
groups delayed Tribune's emergence from bankruptcy.  Many of the
disputes among creditors center on the 2007 leveraged buyout
fraudulence conveyance claims, the resolution of which is a key
issue in the bankruptcy case.

Judge Kevin J. Carey issued an order dated July 13, 2012,
overruling objections to the confirmation of Tribune Co. and its
debtor affiliates' Plan of Reorganization.  In November 2012,
Tribune received approval from the Federal Communications
Commission to transfer media licenses, one of the hurdles to
implementing the reorganization plan.  Aurelius Capital Management
LP failed in halting implementation of the plan pending appeal.

Tribune Co. exited Chapter 11 protection Dec. 31, 2012, ending four
years of reorganization.  The reorganization allowed a group of
banks and hedge funds, including Oaktree Capital Management and
JPMorgan Chase & Co., to take over the media company.


TROIANO TRUCKING: Seeks to Hire Nickless Phillips as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Troiano Trucking, Inc. and Troiano Realty LLC seek approval from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts to hire
Nickless, Phillips and O'Connor as their legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtors of their powers and duties under
the Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services in
connection with their Chapter 11 cases.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Attorney           $200 - $375
     Paralegal             $150

David Nickless, Esq., the firm's attorney who will be handling the
cases, disclosed in court filings that he and other members of the
firm are "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

Nickless Phillips can be reached through:

     David M. Nickless, Esq.
     Nickless, Phillips and O'Connor
     625 Main Street
     Fitchburg, MA 01420
     Tel: (978) 342-4590
     Fax: (978) 343-6383
     Email: dnickless@npolegal.com

             About Troiano Trucking and Troiano Realty

Troiano Trucking, Inc. -- http://www.troianotrucking.com/-- is a
privately held company in Grafton, Mass., in the waste hauling
business.  The company maintains a fleet of four trucks, which
allows it to service its customers with removal of bakery waste,
rubbish, demolition materials and recyclables.  It serves
construction companies, roofing companies, bakeries and individual
home owners.

Troiano Realty, LLC, is a real estate lessor whose principal assets
are located at 109 Creeper Hill Road, North Grafton, Mass.  The
property is valued at $1.48 million based on tax valuation
assessment method.

Troiano Trucking and Troiano Realty sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Mass. Lead Case No. 19-40656)
on April 23, 2019.  At the time of the filing, Troiano Trucking
estimated assets and liabilities of between $1 million and $10
million.  Troiano Realty disclosed $1,485,000 in assets and
$4,220,210 in liabilities.


TWISTLEAF HOLDINGS: Seeks to Hire RPD Analytics as Appraiser
------------------------------------------------------------
Twistleaf Holdings LLC seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Nevada to hire an appraiser and valuation
expert.

In an application filed in court, the Debtor proposes to employ RPD
Analytics, LLC to prepare an appraisal report on its four
properties in Las Vegas.

RPD Analytics will charge a flat fee of $600 for each property.
For additional services, the firm will charge $450 per hour for
testimony and $400 per hour for consultation.

RPD Analytics is a "disinterested person" as defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.  

The firm can be reached at:

     Michael Brunson
     RPD Analytics
     9550 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 253
     Las Vegas, NV 89123
     Phone: (702) 641-5657
     Email: mike@rpdExpert.com

                   About Twistleaf Holdings

Based in Las Vegas, Twistleaf Holdings LLC filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 19-10654) on Feb. 4, 2019.  In
the petition signed by Shawn Samol, authorized representative, the
Debtor disclosed $399,233 in assets and $1,306,756 in liabilities.
The Hon. August B. Landis oversees the case.  Andersen Law Firm,
Ltd. is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


U.S. STEM CELL: Incurs $2.16-Mil. Net Loss for Year Ended Dec. 31
-----------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Stem Cell, Inc. filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its annual report on Form 10-K, disclosing a net loss of
$2,160,427 on $6,700,888 of total revenue for the year ended Dec.
31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $3,481,491 on $5,520,537 of
total revenue for the year ended in 2017.

The audit report of RBSM LLP states that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations, will require additional capital
to fund its current operating plan, and has stated that substantial
doubt exists about the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern.

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2018, showed total assets
of $1,817,089, total liabilities of $8,699,299, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $6,882,210.

A copy of the Form 10-K is available at:

                       https://is.gd/DoJYFt

U.S. Stem Cell, Inc., a biotechnology company, focuses on the
discovery, development, and commercialization of autologous
cellular therapies for the treatment of chronic and acute heart
damage, and vascular and autoimmune diseases in the United States.
The Company was formerly known as Bioheart, Inc. and changed its
name to U.S. Stem Cell, Inc. in October 2015.  U.S. Stem Cell, Inc.
was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Sunrise, Florida.


UNITED EMERGENCY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: United Emergency Medical Corp.
        P.O. Box 1880
        Bayamon, PR 00960

Business Description: United Emergency Medical Corp. is a
                      privately held company that provides medical

                      transportation services.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 2, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Puerto Rico (Old San Juan)

Case No.: 19-02477

Judge: Hon. Mildred Caban Flores

Debtor's Counsel: Ruben Gonzalez Marrero, Esq.
                  GONZALEZ & VELASCO LAW OFFICE
                  URB Santa Rosa
                  Carr 174 BLQ 21-24
                  Bayamon, PR 00959
                  Tel: 787 798-8600
                  E-mail: rgm@microjuris.com;
                          velascolaw@hotmail.com;
                          rgmattorney1pr@gmail.com

Total Assets: $1,681,407

Total Liabilities: $825,705

The petition was signed by Josue Quintero Barroso, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb19-02477.pdf


USG CORP: S&P Withdraws 'BB+' ICR After Gebr Knauf Acquisition
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew its ratings, including the 'BB+' issuer
credit rating, on Chicago-based USG Corp. following completion of
its acquisition by Germany-based building materials manufacturer
Gebr. Knauf KG (Knauf; not rated).

S&P also withdrew its 'BB+' issue-level ratings on the company's
senior unsecured notes and various IRBs.

With the closing of the merger, USG is required to make an offer to
repurchase any and all of the approximately $350 million
outstanding 2025 notes and approximately $500 million outstanding
2027 notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal, plus
accrued and unpaid interest.



VCLS HOLDINGS: Seeks to Hire Portfolio Real Estate as Broker
------------------------------------------------------------
VCLC Holdings LLC seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Texas to hire a real estate broker.

In an application in court, the Debtor proposes to employ Portfolio
Real Estate—KW to list and sell its property located at 114
Rosemary, San Antonio, Texas.  The firm will receive 6% of the
sales price as commission.

Edward Alanis, a partner at Portfolio, attests that his firm does
not hold an interest adverse to the Debtor's estate and is a
"disinterested person" pursuant to Section 327 of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Edward Alanis
     Portfolio Real Estate—KW
     10999 IH-10 West 175
     San Antonio, TX 78230
     Phone: 210-771-5603

                             About VCLC Holdings LLC

Based in San Antonio, Texas, VCLC Holdings LLC filed a voluntary
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 19-50231) on
February 4, 2019, listing under $1 million in both assets and
liabilities. The case has been assigned to Judge Craig A. Gargotta.
Villa & White LLP is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


VERISIGN INC: Moody's Hikes CFR & Sr. Unsecured Debt Rating to Ba1
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded VeriSign, Inc.'s Corporate
Family Rating to Ba1 from Ba2, Probability of Default Rating to
Ba1-PD from Ba2-PD and its senior unsecured notes rating to Ba1
from Ba2. Concurrently, the company's Speculative Grade Liquidity
Rating was affirmed at SGL-1. The ratings outlook is stable.

The upgrade of the CFR reflects steadily improving revenue and
earnings, solid credit metrics for the rating category, large cash
balances as well as the benefit from the new cooperative agreement
with the U.S. Department of Commerce. The agreement between
Verisign and the DoC clears the way for the company to change its
.com registry agreement with the Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names and Numbers to increase wholesale prices on .com top-level
domains, while removing some regulatory oversight, among other
provisions. Enhanced pricing flexibility will enable the company to
increase its already-robust free cash flow beginning in 2021.

Moody's anticipates that Verisign will generate at least $650
million in free cash flow over the next 12-18 months, sustain its
high EBITDA margin (above 65%) and prudently manage its cash
sources towards share repurchases that will not materially weaken
its credit metrics.

Moody's took the following rating action on VeriSign, Inc.:

-- Corporate Family Rating, upgraded to Ba1 from Ba2

-- Probability of Default Rating, upgraded to Ba1-PD from Ba2-PD

-- $750 million senior unsecured notes due 2023, upgraded to Ba1
      (LGD4) from Ba2(LGD4)

-- $550 million senior unsecured notes due 2027, upgraded to Ba1
      (LGD4) from Ba2 (LGD4)

-- $500 million senior unsecured notes due 2025, upgraded to Ba1
      (LGD4) from Ba2 (LGD4)

-- Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, affirmed at SGL-1

Outlook Action:

-- Ratings Outlook Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba1 CFR is supported by Versign's dominant position as the
exclusive global registry operator for the most commercially
visible .com top-level domain, its strong profitability and the
recurring revenue stream. Verisign maintains very good liquidity
and Moody's expects the company will generate at least $650 million
in free cash flow in 2019 (approximately 39% of total debt). The
company's debt-to-EBITDA (Moody's adjusted), estimated at 2.3x as
of March 31, 2019, has remained in the low 2.0x range for more than
a year but Moody's expects that over the next 12-18 months Verisign
may incur additional debt to pursue more aggressive share
repurchases in excess of internally generated free cash flow,
temporary driving debt-to-EBITDA above 3.0x.

Verisign faces strong competition from alternative TLDs and other
online platforms, and the increasingly mature demand for .com
domains will constrain its organic growth. Verisign will remain the
sole registry operator of .com and .net TLDs through 2024 and 2023,
respectively, under its registry agreements with Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. The .com registry
agreement with ICANN restricts Verisign's ability to raise prices
for .com domains and expand into certain related businesses. The
U.S. Department of Commerce maintains oversight of Verisign's .com
registry operations through the Cooperative Agreement between the
two parties. Verisign has renewal rights under its agreements with
ICANN and DoC and a track record of renewing these agreements.
Verisign's ratings are further constrained by modest scale, lack of
revenue diversification and history of distributing the majority of
internally generated cash flow towards share repurchases, including
periodically debt-financed buybacks.

Moody's expects Verisign to have very good liquidity over the next
12-18 months, as reflected in the SGL-1 rating. The company's
liquidity is supported by solid cash balances (including short-term
investments) of $1.25 billion as of March 31, 2019, Moody's
expectation for annual free cash flow above $650 million in 2019,
and full availability under its $200 million revolving credit
facility through April 2020. These cash sources are robust,
compared to Moody's expectation of annual capital spending
requirements of $50 million and no debt maturities or mandatory
amortization until May 2023. The revolver is subject to two
financial maintenance covenants consisting of a maximum
debt-to-EBITDA leverage ratio of 2.5x and interest coverage of at
least 3.0x. Moody's expects the company will have a significant
cushion under both ratios over the next 12-18 months.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's anticipation of a moderate
improvement in financial strength metrics in fiscal 2019 driven by
low-single digit domain name growth and stable renewal rates.
Moody's expects Verisign will generate over $800 million in EBITDA
(Moody's adjusted) and more than $650 million in free cash flow in
2019.

While unlikely in the near term, Verisign's ratings could be
upgraded if the company were able to maintain consistent organic
topline growth and commit to clear and conservative financial
policy. Moody's could downgrade Verisign's ratings if changes in
the terms of the registry agreement with ICANN adversely affect
Verisign's business, earnings decline, the company pursues more
aggressive financial policies that lead to material weakening of
the credit metrics, or Moody's expects Verisign's debt-to-EBITDA
(Moody's adjusted) to be sustained above 3.5 times.

Verisign is a publicly-traded global provider of domain name
registry services and internet infrastructure services. The company
operates the authoritative directory of and/or back-end systems for
all .com, .net, .cc, .tv, .gov, .jobs, .edu and .name domain names,
among others. Verisign generated revenues of approximately $1.2
billion in the last twelve months ended March 31, 2019.


VISION INVESTMENT: June 19 Plan Confirmation Hearing
----------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Robert E. Grant approved Vision Investment Group,
Inc.'s disclosure statement filed on Feb. 20 2019.  The
confirmation hearing will be held on June 19, 2019 at 11:00 AM.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that unsecured
creditors under the plan will get $2,000 payment for five years.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated February 20,
2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y3hc6wrw from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                 About Vision Investment Group

Based in Bluffton, Indiana, Vision Investment Group, Inc., filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ind. Case No. 18-10864) on May 11,
2018, estimating $100,001 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to
$10 million in liabilities.  Daniel J. Skekloff, at Haller &
Colvin, PC, is the Debtor's counsel.


WEYERBACHER BREWING: Seeks to Hire Ciardi Ciardi as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Weyerbacher Brewing Company, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to hire
Ciardi Ciardi & Astin, P.C., as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services in connection
with its Chapter 11 case.

The attorneys and paralegal expected to provide the services are:

     Albert Ciardi, III             $515
     Jennifer McEntee               $350
     Daniel Siedman                 $300
     Stephanie Frizlen, Paralegal   $120

The firm received a pre-bankruptcy retainer in the amount of
$30,000.

Albert Ciardi III, Esq., a partner at Ciardi, disclosed in court
filings that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

        Albert A. Ciardi, III, Esq.
        Ciardi Ciardi & Astin, P.C.
        One Commerce Square
        2005 Market Street, Suite 3500
        Philadelphia, PA 19103
        Tel: (215) 557-3550
        Fax: 215-557-3551
        E-mail: aciardi@ciardilaw.com

             - and -

        Jennifer E. Cranston, Esq.
        Ciardi Ciardi & Astin, P.C.
        One Commerce Square
        2005 Market Street, Suite 3500
        Philadelphia, PA 19103
        Tel: 215 557 3550
        E-mail: jcranston@ciardilaw.com

                  About Weyerbacher Brewing Co

Weyerbacher Brewing Company, Inc., sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 19-12558) on
April 22, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated
assets of between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of
between $1 million and $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge
Richard E. Fehling.  Ciardi Ciardi & Astin, P.C., is the Debtor's
counsel.



WHEEL PROS: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR Amid Mobile Hi-Tech Deal
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Wheel Pros, Inc.'s B3 Corporate
Family Rating and B3-PD Probability of Default Rating on its
proposed acquisition of Mobile Hi-Tech Wheels. Concurrently,
Moody's affirmed its ratings on the company's senior secured first
lien term loan and second lien term loan at B2 and Caa2,
respectively. The outlook is stable.

Wheel Pros has signed a definitive agreement to acquire MHT, a
distributor of custom aftermarket wheels, through the issuance of
$326 million in incremental first lien and $90 million in second
lien term loans borrowings and equity contributions from the
current sponsor, Clearlake Capital Group, L.P. and rollover equity
from MHT. In addition to supporting the acquisition of MHT,
proceeds will be used to repay existing borrowings under the
asset-based loan revolver, cover transaction fees & expenses, and
add cash to the balance sheet. The company's current $60 million
ABL (unrated) will remain in place.

According to Moody's Analyst Andrew MacDonald, "Wheel Pro's
transformational acquisition of MHT positions the company as a
leader in a highly fragmented market with potential upside for
margins and cash flow, but it also views the acquisition as being
aggressive given the amount of debt being issued that will weaken
credit metrics and the potential for integration risk."

Moody's took the following ratings on Wheel Pros, Inc.:

  Corporate Family Rating, affirmed at B3

  Probability of Default Rating, affirmed at B3-PD

  $554.3 million (including $326 million add-on)
  Gtd Senior Secured First-Lien Term Loan due 2025,
  affirmed at B2 (LGD3)

  $160 million (including $90 million add-on) Gtd
  Senior Secured Second-Lien Term Loan due 2026,
  affirmed at Caa2 (LGD5)

  Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Wheel Pros' B3 CFR is broadly constrained by the company's high
leverage, increasingly aggressive financial policy evidenced by
recent debt funded acquisitions, highly discretionary and narrow
product focus that is also exposed to volatile raw material costs
(albeit partially mitigated by pricing programs), and seasonal
working capital needs. The company's rating is supported, however,
by a good market position within its proprietary branded wheel
products that has increased materially with the addition of MHT, a
presence in the aftermarket that provides a degree of revenue
stability, favorable customer diversification, and a history of
good sales growth. However, Moody's believes that the acquisition
of MHT will require significant investment over time to fully
integrate the two businesses and expects the company will continue
to make strategic acquisitions to broaden its product offerings
that could delay deleveraging. Moody's expects Wheel Pros'
liquidity profile will remain adequate during the next twelve
months, but the company may rely on its modestly sized ABL to fund
seasonal working capital needs. Pro-forma for the acquisition of
MHT, the company's debt-to-EBITDA and EBITA-to-interest for the
twelve months ended December 31, 2018 is 6.3 times and 1.7 times,
respectively (all ratios are Moody's-adjusted unless otherwise
stated). Moody's expects leverage to fall below 6.0 times during
the next 12-18 months as revenues grow in the mid-single digit
percent range and debt is repaid from a combination of $5.6 million
of annual mandatory debt amortization and from excess cash flows
payments.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's forecasts that the company will
continue to modestly grow revenue and generate positive free cash
flow on an annual basis, leading to improved earnings and a gradual
reduction in leverage over the next eighteen months. The stable
outlook is also predicated on the expectation that adequate
liquidity will be maintained.

Wheel Pro's ratings could be upgraded if the company is able to
integrate MHT with minimal challenges while continuing to grow both
revenue and EBITDA. An upgrade would also require a financial
policy that supports debt-to-EBITDA sustained below 5.5 times even
when considering its acquisition growth strategy, and retained cash
flow-to-debt maintained above 10%. At least an adequate liquidity
profile would also need to be maintained for consideration of an
upgrade.

Conversely, downward ratings pressure could ensue if debt-to-EBITDA
is expected to be sustained above 7.0 times, operating margins
deteriorate or free cash flows turn negative. A significant
reduction in liquidity, or a debt financed dividend and/or
acquisition could also result in a ratings downgrade.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global
Automotive Supplier Industry published in June 2016.

Wheel Pros, headquartered in Greenwood Village, Colorado, is a
wholesale distributor of custom and proprietary branded wheels,
performance tires and related accessories in the aftermarket
automotive segment. The company owns fifteen proprietary
customizable wheel and accessory brands and a network of
distribution centers, primarily in North America. The company is
majority-owned by private equity financial sponsor Clearlake
Capital Group, L.P. Management reported revenue (pro forma for the
acquisition of MHT) for the year ended December 31, 2018 of
approximately $782 million.


WMC MORTGAGE: May 7 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
--------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, United States Trustee, for Region 3, will hold an
organizational meeting on May 7, 2019, at 10:30 a.m. in the
bankruptcy case of WMC Mortgage, LLC.

The meeting will be held at:

         The Doubletree Hotel
         700 King Street
         Wilmington, DE 19801

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it
represents.

                   About WMC Mortgage

WMC Mortgage, LLC, directly and through various predecessors, was
in the business of originating residential mortgage loans for more
than 60 years.  The collapse of the housing and financial markets
presaging the Great Recession decimated WMC's loan origination
business.

WMC Mortgage sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-10879) on April 23, 2019.
The Debtor had estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and
liabilities of $100 million to $500 million. The petition was
signed by Mark V. Asdourian, president and chief executive officer.
The cases have been assigned to Christopher S. Sontchi.  

The Debtor tapped Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. as bankruptcy
counsel; Jenner & Block LLP as special litigation counsel; Alvarez
& Marsal Disputes and Investigatons LLC as financial advisor; and
Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC as claims, noticing and
solicitation agent.


WOODLAWN COMMUNITY: Trustee Taps Millennium Properties as Broker
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gina Krol, the Chapter 11 trustee for Woodlawn Community
Development Corp., received authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Illinois to employ Millennium
Properties Real Estate as real estate broker.

The Debtor is the owner of the following parcels of real property:

     4108 S. King Drive           Commercial Building
     4112 S. King Drive           Vacant Building
     1 E. Cermak (2201 S. State)  Undeveloped
     6121 S. Rhodes               Residential
     2211 S. State                Undeveloped
     1437 E. 65th                 Vacant Building
     6521 S. Evans                Undeveloped
     6445 S. Kimbark              Undeveloped
     6312 S. Woodlawn             Undeveloped
     4123-57 S. Calumet           Undeveloped
     6537 S. Maryland             Vacant Building
     6547 S. Maryland             Undeveloped

Millennium Properties will be paid a 5% commission by the
purchasers on all sales. Any cooperating broker is anticipated to
receive 2% of the brokerage commission.

Daniel Hyman, chairman and chief executive officer of Millennium
Properties, disclosed in court filings that he is a disinterested
person and does not hold any interest adverse to the Debtor's
bankruptcy estate.

The firm can be reached at:

     Daniel J. Hyman
     Millennium Properties Real Estate
     205 W. Wacker Dr., Suite 1750
     Chicago, IL 60660
     Phone: +1 312-338-3000

          About Woodlawn Community Development

Founded in 1972, Woodlawn Community Development Corp. --
https://www.wcdcchicago.com/ -- manages and develops affordable
housing for families in the Greater Metro Chicago area.  The
company is based in Chicago.  

Woodlawn Community Development filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
N.D. Ill. Case No. 18-29862) on Oct. 24, 2018.  In the petition
signed by Leon Finney, Jr., president and chief executive officer,
the Debtor estimated $50 million to $100 million in both assets and
liabilities.  The Hon. Carol A. Doyle oversees the case.  David R.
Herzog, Esq., at Herzog & Schwartz, P.C., is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


WYNN RESORTS: Moody's Alters Outlook on Ba3 CFR to Positive
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service revised the outlook for Wynn Resorts,
Limited to positive from negative in response to the report by the
Massachusetts Gaming Commission that the company's license to own
and operate the Encore Boston Harbor, which is scheduled to open in
approximately 2 months, has been maintained.

WYNN's Ba3 Corporate Family Rating, Ba3-PD Probability of Default
Rating, Ba3 backed senior secured bank credit facility were
affirmed. In addition, Wynn America, LLC's senior secured bank
credit facility was affirmed at Ba2, Wynn Las Vegas, LLC's senior
unsecured rating was affirmed at B1, and Wynn Macau, Limited's
senior unsecured B1. The Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating remains
unchanged at SGL-1.

"The outlook revision to positive reflects the MGC's decision to
maintain WYNN's gaming license in the State thereby alleviating
Moody's concern regarding WYNN's ability to own and operate Encore
Boston Harbor," stated Keith Foley, a Senior Vice President at
Moody's. "The MGC's decision, combined with Moody's expectation
that Boston Encore Harbor will ramp up quickly and perform well
over the long term strongly suggests that WYNN's credit profile
will improve," added Foley.

Although the MGC did not find substantial evidence that the company
willfully provided false or misleading information, they did find
certain violations and failures of policies and procedures to
investigate allegations of wrongdoing, and as a result, the MGC did
impose certain penalties. Moody's view is that these penalties,
albeit it concerning to some degree, were not material enough to
affect Moody's decision to revise the outlook to positive from
negative.

The penalties instituted by the MGC included: (1) a $35 million
fine to the company; (2) a $500,000 fine to the current CEO and
requirement of training and executive coaching on certain
management issues; (3) the employment of an independent monitor to
conduct a full review and evaluation of internal policies; and (4)
a requirement that WYNN maintain the separation of Chair and CEO
for the duration of its 15 year gaming license.

The positive outlook also considers Moody's continued favorable
long-term revenue and earnings prospects for the company's Macau,
China, and Las Vegas Strip, Nevada casino resort properties.

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Wynn Resorts, Limited

  Outlook, Changed To Positive From Negative

Affirmations:

Issuer: Wynn America, LLC

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Ba2
  (LGD2)

Issuer: Wynn Las Vegas, LLC

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed B1
  (LGD5)

Issuer: Wynn Macau, Limited

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed B1
  (LGD5)

Issuer: Wynn Resorts, Limited

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba3-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba3

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Ba3
  (LGD4)

RATINGS RATIONALE

WYNN's Ba3 Corporate Family Rating is supported by the quality,
popularity, and favorable reputation of the company's resort
properties -- a factor that continues to distinguish it from most
other gaming operators -- along with the company's well-established
and very successful track record of building large, high quality
destination resorts. WYNN's very good liquidity profile and
relatively low cost of debt capital also support the ratings.

Key credit concerns include WYNN's limited diversification despite
the fact that it is one of the largest U.S. gaming operators in
terms of revenue. WYNN's revenue and cash flow will remain heavily
concentrated in the Macau gaming market, even after Encore Boston
Harbor opens. Moody's also expect that WYNN will be presented with
and pursue other large, high profile, integrated resort development
opportunities around the world. As a result there will likely be
periods where the company's leverage experiences periods of
increases due to partially debt-financed, future development
projects.

An upgrade would require that the initial ramp-up of Encore Boston
Harbor supports WYNN's ability to maintain net debt/EBITDA on a
Moody's adjusted basis below 5.0 times. Net debt/EBITDA was about
4.7 times for the fiscal year-ended Dec. 31, 2018 applying about
50% of the company's cash to the net debt calculation. Ratings
could be downgraded if adjusted net debt/ EBITDA rises above 6.0
times for any reason and/or the any future material issues arise
that could affect the company's operations or ability to maintain
its license.

Wynn Resorts, Limited, is a developer, owner and operator of
integrated casino resorts. In the Macau Special Administrative
Region of the People's Republic of China, the company owns
approximately 72% of Wynn Macau, Limited, which includes the
operations of the Wynn Macau and Wynn Palace resorts. In Las Vegas,
Nevada, the company operates and, with the exception of certain
retail space, owns 100% of Wynn Las Vegas. Consolidated net revenue
for the fiscal year-ended Dec. 31, 2018 was $6.7 billion.


XPLOSION INC: Continued Losses Cast Going Concern Doubt
-------------------------------------------------------
Xplosion Incorporated filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $84,240 on $0 of revenue for the three
months ended Jan. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $67,872 on
$2,908 of revenue for the same period in 2018.

At Jan. 31, 2019 the Company had total assets of $3,489,024, total
liabilities of $271,386, and $3,217,638 in total stockholders'
equity.

At Jan. 31, 2019 and Oct. 31, 2018, the Company had cash of $158
and $200, respectively, and negative working capital of $271,228 as
at Jan. 31, 2019 and $222,230 as at Oct. 31, 2018.  For the three
months ended Jan. 31, 2019 and 2018 the Company had net losses of
$84,240 and $67,872, respectively.  Continued losses may adversely
affect the liquidity of the Company in the future.  

Company President Eugenio Gregorio states that the factors noted
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.

Mr. Gregorio further stated, "The recoverability of a major portion
of the recorded assets amounts shown in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements is dependent upon continued
operations of the Company, which in turn is dependent on the
Company's ability to raise additional capital, obtain financing and
to succeed in its future operations.  The consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or
amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary
should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.  The
Company's existence is dependent upon management's ability to
develop profitable operations and resolve its liquidity problems."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/Fr5vFd

Xplosion Incorporated markets and distributes innovative lifestyle
and enhancement products and complimentary goods through a global
distribution license for the SayberX line of self-stimulation
devices for men and couples.  The Company was incorporated on
October 6, 2015, and is headquartered in California.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2019.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***