/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/190826.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, August 26, 2019, Vol. 23, No. 237

                            Headlines

1989 3AVE LLC: Hires Chase Global as Real Estate Broker
220 52ND STREET: Hires Alla Kachan P.C. as Counsel
AAC HOLDINGS: Deerfield Entities No Longer Own Shares as of Aug. 22
AAC HOLDINGS: Delays Second Quarter Form 10-Q Filing
AAC HOLDINGS: Gets NYSE Letter After Missing 10-Q Deadline

AAC HOLDINGS: Reports Preliminary Second Quarter Results
ADAIR MECHANICAL: Plumbing Contractor Gets Access to Cash
ADEENIH REAL ESTATE: Taps Zamal Z. Mohamed, CPA, as Accountant
AI CAUSA LLC: Seeks to Hire Integro Consultants as Accountant
ALPHA SCREEN: Seeks to Hire Robert O Lampl as Counsel

ALTHAUS FAMILY: Seeks to Hire Diller and Rice as Counsel
AMYRIS INC: Delays Filing of Second Quarter Form 10-Q
ANGELS FOR KIDS: Behavioral Health Co. Motion Abated, Court Says
APPVION INC: KNA, FTB Suit vs FAI, et al., Remains in New York
ASCOT FUND: Chapter 15 Approved over HFC Objection

ATKINS NUTRITIONALS: Moody's Reviews B1 CFR for Downgrade
AURORA COMMERCIAL: Hires Fox Rothschild as Special Counsel
AVENUE STORES: Hires Prime Clerk as Claims Agent
B.L.E. INC: Seeks to Hire Barry Gould, CPA, as Accountant
BEAUTIFUL BROWS: Trustee Hires Henry F. Sewell Jr. as Counsel

BES LLC: Electrical Service Company Gets Final OK on Cash Use
BETHLEHEM-CENTER SCHOOL: Moody's Gives Ba1 Rating to 2019 Bonds
BIG JACK: S&P Discontinues 'B' Issue-Level Rating Following Sale
BLACK RIDGE: Reports $631K Net Loss for Second Quarter
BLACK RIDGE: Signs Consulting Agreement with Allied Esports

BODY RENEW: Committee Taps Hirschler Fleischer as Counsel
BODY RENEW: Hires Michael Callahan and Associates as Accountant
BODY RENEW: Hires R.L. Rasmus Auctioneers as Auctioneer
BRADLEY INVESTMENTS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
BRIGHT MOUNTAIN: Closes Share Exchange and Plan of Merger Deal

BRIGHT MOUNTAIN: Reports $705K Net Loss for Second Quarter
BRUNO ONE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
BUFFALO ORIGINAL: Court Approves Debtor Stipulation with M&T Bank
BUFORD ELECTRIC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
C3 VENTURES: Gets Court Approval to Hire Expert Witness

CALIFORNIA PIZZA: Moody's Cuts CFR to Caa1 & Alters Outlook to Neg.
CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE: Moody's Ups Series A-2 2007 Bonds to Caa2
CAREVIEW COMMUNICATIONS: Incurs $3.4 Million Net Loss in Q2
CARROLL REALTY: Seeks to Hire Burns Law Firm as Counsel
CBAK ENERGY: Incurs $2.33 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter

CITY RESTAURANT: Seeks to Hire Berger Fischoff as Attorney
CITYWIDE COMMUNITY: Seeks Release of Garnished Fund to Pay Wages
CITYWIDE COMMUNITY: Seeks to Hire Ciardi Ciardi as Counsel
COASTAL HOME: Seeks to Hire Blanchard Law as Attorney
COLORADO GROUP 3: Files Second Amended Cash Collateral Request

COLORADO GROUP: Presents Second Amended Cash Collateral Motion
COSMOS HOLDINGS: Incurs $1.54 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
DELPHI CORP: DAS Wins Summary Judgment Bid vs Kevin Spencer
DEMERARA HOLDINGS: Wants Cash Access to Maintain Mortgage Property
DK ENTERPRISES: Seeks to Hire Lamberth Cifelli as Counsel

DR. RICHARD R. ROLLE: Maxillofacial Surgery Center Seeks Cash Use
DREW MARINE: S&P Withdraws 'B' Issuer Credit Rating
EAGLE CORP: Seeks to Hire Keen-Summit as Real Estate Advisor
ELANCO ANIMAL: S&P Places 'BB+' ICR on Watch Neg. on Bayer AG Deal
ENRAMADA PROPERTIES: Case Summary & 7 Unsecured Creditors

ENTERCOM COMMUNICATIONS: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable
FILTRATION SERVICES: Seeks to Use BofA Cash Collateral
FIVE J’S: Auto Parts Co and BOTW Stipulation Approved
FRIENDS OF CITRUS: Seeks to Hire GlassRatner as Accountant
FRIENDS OF CITRUS: Seeks to Hire Nelson Mullins as Counsel

GB SCIENCES: Incurs $2.54 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
GENWORTH FINANCIAL: S&P Continues 'B' LT ICR on Watch Developing
GJ SOUTH LLC: Seeks to Hire Guy Humphries as Counsel
GLOBAL HEALTHCARE: Reports $176,000 Net Loss for Second Quarter
GO DADDY: S&P Raises Issuer Credit Rating to 'BB'; Outlook Stable

GREEN FIELDS: Committee Seeks to Hire Rusing Lopez as Counsel
GULFPORT ENERGY: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B+' on Weak Financial Measures
GYPSUM RESOURCES: Hires Conway MacKenzie as Financial Advisor
GYPSUM RESOURCES: Seeks to Hire Fox Rothschild as Counsel
HALCON RESOURCES: Clark Hill Represents Multiple Parties

IMPORT SPECIALTIES: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ISRS REALTY: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
ISTAR INC: S&P Alters Outlook to Positive, Affirms 'BB-' ICR
JAB OF ROCKLAND: Seeks to Hire PKF O'Connor as Accountant
JOHN S. WON: Court Conditionally Approves Disclosure Statement

JRND LLC: Court Conditionally Approves Disclosure Statement
JS & ES HOLDINGS: Sept. 12 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
KP ENGINEERING: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
KP ENGINEERING: Files for Chapter 11 Amid Dispute with Targa
LAKE ROAD WELDING: Case Summary & 15 Unsecured Creditors

LASER SITEWORK: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
LEAP ACADEMY: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable on Debt Refinancing
LIFE TIME: S&P Raises Sr. Secured Credit Facility Rating to 'BB-'
LOGISTICS BUDDY: Wins Final Approval to Sell Receivables, Use Cash
LYNWOOD HOLDINGS: Court Approves Disclosure Statement

MA ALTERNATIVE: Court Endorses Stay of NICS Suit Due to Bankruptcy
MAGNUM CONSTRUCTION: Committee Objects to Disclosure Statement
MALCOLM CURTIS: Court Dismisses United States Lawsuit
MARVIN BRODY: Arizona Court Affirms Ruling in Favor of Polsinelli
MCCLAIN TRUCKING: Court Dismisses Chapter 11 Case

MIAH INVESTMENTS: Sept. 24 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
MIDCONTINENT COMMUNICATIONS: S&P Cuts Rating on $300MM Loan to BB
MILLENNIUM PARK: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR; Outlook Stable
MILLERS LANE: Hires Hublar Enterprises as Business Consultant
MONTESQUIEU INC: Unsecureds to Recoup 3% Under Chapter 11 Plan

MOTORS LIQUIDATION: Denial of Gillispie Bid to Pursue Claims Upheld
NORPAC FOODS: Case Summary & 24 Largest Unsecured Creditors
NORPAC FOODS: In Chapter 11 to Sell to Oregon Potato for $149.5MM
OUTFRONT MEDIA: Moody's Affirms Ba3 CFR, Outlook Stable
O’LINN SECURITY: Granted Interim Approval to Use Cash Collateral

PALM BEACH GOLF: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
PEABODY ENERGY: Court Flips Order Granting Bid for Atty's Fees
PES HOLDINGS: Seeks to Hire Pachulski Stang as Co-Counsel
PHUNWARE INC: Incurs $3.1 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
PRESSURE BIOSCIENCES: Reports $4.07-Mil. Net Loss for 2nd Quarter

R&G FINANCIAL: Dismissal of A. Zucker Suit vs Ex-Officers Upheld
R1 RCM: S&P Withdraws 'B-' Issuer Credit Rating
RHINO RUSH: Court Junks Bid for TRO vs Raw Pharma
RODAN & FIELDS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B'; Outlook Negative
RUE21 INC: Liquidated Damages Provision Enforceable, Ct. Rules

SAO FERNANDO ACUCAR: Chapter 15 Case Summary
SIMPLY GOOD FOODS: S&P Places 'B+' ICR on Watch Neg. on Quest Deal
SUSQUEHANNA AREA: Fitch Affirms BB+ on $138.5MM Airport Bonds
T.A.J. REALTY: Seeks Cash Access, Plans Asset Sale to Pay Off Loan
TTM TECHNOLOGIES: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'BB' ICR

VELMO USA: Gets OK for Interim Cash Collateral Use
WEATHERFORD INT’L: Ropes, Norton Represent Official Committee
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC: Ruling Against R. Lightsey, J. Cook Upheld
YUMA ENERGY: Incurs $3.96 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from August 19 to 23, 2019


                            *********

1989 3AVE LLC: Hires Chase Global as Real Estate Broker
-------------------------------------------------------
1989 3Ave LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of New York to employ Chase Global Realty
Corp., as real estate broker to the Debtor.

1989 3Ave LLC requires Chase Global to assist the Debtor in the
sale of its real property located at 1985 and 1987 3 Avenue, New
York, New York (Block 1659, Lots 1&2) to Sunny Sycamore LLC.

Chase Global will be paid a commission of 2.5% of the selling
price.

Chong Gu Chen, partner of Chase Global Realty Corp., assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Chase Global can be reached at:

     Chong Gu Chen
     CHASE GLOBAL REALTY CORP.
     140-75 Ash Ave, Suite 2E
     Flushing, NY 11355
     Tel: (718) 355-8788

                      About 1989 3Ave LLC

Based in Elmhurst, New York, 1989 3Ave, LLC, a privately held
company engaged in activities related to real estate, filed a
voluntary Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-47234)
on Dec. 19, 2018. In the petition signed by Bo Jin Zhu, manager,
the Debtor disclosed assets totaling $23,000,106 and liabilities
totaling $24,761,785. The case is assigned to Hon. Nancy Hershey
Lord. William X. Zou, Esq., in Flushing, New York, is the Debtor's
counsel. [BN]



220 52ND STREET: Hires Alla Kachan P.C. as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------
220 52nd Street, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to employ the Law
Offices of Alla Kachan, P.C., as counsel to the Debtor.

220 52nd Street requires Alla Kachan P.C. to:

   a) assist the Debtor in administering this case;

   b) make such motions or taking such action as may be
      appropriate or necessary under the Bankruptcy Code;

   c) represent the Debtor in prosecuting adversary proceedings
      to collect assets of the estate and such other actions as
      Debtor deem appropriate;

   d) take such steps as may be necessary for Debtor to marshal
      and protect the estate's assets;

   e) negotiate with the Debtor's creditors in formulating a plan
      of reorganization for Debtor in this case;

   f) draft and prosecute the confirmation of the Debtor's plan
      of reorganization in the bankruptcy case; and

   g) render such additional services as the Debtor may require
      in the bankruptcy case.

Alla Kachan P.C. will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                $400
     Paraprofessionals        $200

Alla Kachan P.C. will be paid a retainer in the amount of $15,000.

Alla Kachan P.C. will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Alla Kachan, partner of the Law Offices of Alla Kachan, P.C.,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Alla Kachan P.C. can be reached at:

     Alla Kachan, Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF ALLA KACHAN, P.C.
     3099 Coney Island Avenue
     Brooklyn, NY 11235
     Telephone: (718) 513-3145

                        About 220 52nd Street

220 52nd Street, LLC owns four real estate properties in Staten
Island, New York; Adelanto, California; and Desert Hot Springs,
California having a total current value of $4.76 million.

220 52nd Street, LLC, based in Staten Island, NY, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-44646) on July 30, 2019.
The Hon. Elizabeth S. Stong presides over the case. Alla Kachan,
Esq., at the Law Offices of Alla Kachan, P.C., serves as bankruptcy
counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $4,760,124 in assets and
$3,705,011 in liabilities. The petition was signed by Ruslan
Agarunov, president.



AAC HOLDINGS: Deerfield Entities No Longer Own Shares as of Aug. 22
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Deerfield Mgmt, L.P., Deerfield Management Company,
L.P., Deerfield Partners, L.P., Deerfield Special Situations Fund,
L.P., and James E. Flynn disclosed that as of Aug. 22, 2019, they
have ceased to beneficially own shares of common stock of AAC
Holdings, Inc.  A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is
available for free at https://is.gd/zTcznI

                       About AAC Holdings

Headquartered in Brentwood, Tennessee, AAC Holdings, Inc. --
http://www.americanaddictioncenters.com/-- is a provider of
inpatient and outpatient substance use treatment services for
individuals with drug addiction, alcohol addiction and co-occurring
mental/behavioral health issues.  In connection with its treatment
services, the Company performs clinical diagnostic laboratory
services and provide physician services to its clients.  As of Dec.
31, 2018, the Company operated 11 inpatient substance abuse
treatment facilities located throughout the United States, focused
on delivering effective clinical care and treatment solutions
across 1,080 inpatient beds, including 700 licensed detoxification
beds, 24 standalone outpatient centers and 4 sober living
facilities across 471 beds for a total of 1,551 combined inpatient
and sober living beds.

AAC Holdings reported a net loss of $66.71 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $17.38 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of March 31, 2019, AAC Holdings
had $480.22 million in total assets, $461.56 million in total
liabilities, and total stockholders' equity including
noncontrolling interest of $18.65 million.

BDO USA, LLP, in Nashville, Tennessee, the Company's auditor since
2011, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 12, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has
incurred a loss from operations and negative cash flows from
operations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.

                            *   *   *

In March 2019, S&P Global Ratings lowered the issuer credit rating
on AAC Holdings Inc. to 'CCC' from 'B-' and said the outlook is
negative.  According to S&P, the downgrade reflects escalated risk
of a default and risk that AAC's liquidity will not be sufficient
over the next 12 months, primarily due to the $30 million term loan
maturing in about one year.

Moody's Investors Service downgraded the corporate family rating
rating of AAC Holdings, parent company of American Addiction
Centers, Inc., to 'Caa2' from 'B3'.  The downgrade to 'Caa2'
reflects AAC's very weak third quarter results and lower guidance
for the rest of 2018, as reported by the TCR on Nov. 16, 2018.


AAC HOLDINGS: Delays Second Quarter Form 10-Q Filing
----------------------------------------------------
AAC Holdings, Inc. has determined that it is not able to file its
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter ended June 30,
2019 by the prescribed due date without unreasonable effort or
expense.

As previously disclosed, the Company has been focused on
operational improvements and running a strategic transaction
process through Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. to raise capital through
sales of real estate and other assets through recapitalization and
refinancing transactions, in order to improve its financial
position and liquidity.  Through the Cantor process, the Company is
engaged in discussions with numerous private equity funds, real
estate investors and other third parties that have expressed
interest in investing in the Company, its real estate and/or other
assets.

The Company expects to report sequential improvements in revenue
and adjusted EBITDA for the quarter ended June 30, 2019 and is
engaged in discussions with numerous interested capital sources.  
The Company is also finalizing its goodwill analysis for purposes
of its quarterly report.

The Company's management has been, and continues to be, focused on
ensuring compliance with the Company's Credit Agreement, dated
March 8, 2019, with Credit Suisse AG, as administrative agent and
collateral agent, and the lenders party thereto, and the Company's
Amendment and Waiver No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated March 8,
2019, by and among the Company, Credit Suisse AG, as administrative
agent and collateral agent, the required lenders party thereto and
the other loan parties party thereto which amended that certain
Credit Agreement, dated June 30, 2017, as previously amended, by
and among the Company, Credit Suisse AG, as administrative agent
and collateral agent, and the lenders party thereto.  Certain
events of default have occurred under the Credit Facilities.  The
Company's management is currently engaged in discussions with its
lenders regarding entrance into one or more amendments to the
Credit Facilities, forbearance agreements or both, which would
address the Company's current liquidity, compliance with covenants
and obligations and its strategic transaction process, among other
matters.

Because these efforts have required a significant amount of
management's time and attention that would otherwise be devoted to
the preparation of the Form 10-Q and because the Company believes
that any amendments to the Credit Facilities, any forbearance
agreements or both could materially affect the financial
information and operational results presented in the Form 10-Q, the
Company is unable to file the Form 10-Q within the prescribed
period of time without unreasonable effort or expense. The Company
currently expects to file the Form 10-Q within the extension period
of five calendar days as provided under Rule 12b-25 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                       About AAC Holdings

Headquartered in Brentwood, Tennessee, AAC Holdings, Inc. --
http://www.americanaddictioncenters.com-- is a provider of
inpatient and outpatient substance use treatment services for
individuals with drug addiction, alcohol addiction and co-occurring
mental/behavioral health issues.  In connection with its treatment
services, the Company performs clinical diagnostic laboratory
services and provide physician services to its clients.  As of Dec.
31, 2018, the Company operated 11 inpatient substance abuse
treatment facilities located throughout the United States, focused
on delivering effective clinical care and treatment solutions
across 1,080 inpatient beds, including 700 licensed detoxification
beds, 24 standalone outpatient centers and 4 sober living
facilities across 471 beds for a total of 1,551 combined inpatient
and sober living beds.

AAC Holdings reported a net loss of $66.71 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $17.38 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of March 31, 2019, AAC Holdings
had $480.22 million in total assets, $461.56 million in total
liabilities, and total stockholders' equity including
noncontrolling interest of $18.65 million.

BDO USA, LLP, in Nashville, Tennessee, the Company's auditor since
2011, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 12, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has
incurred a loss from operations and negative cash flows from
operations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.

                            *   *   *

In March 2019, S&P Global Ratings lowered the issuer credit rating
on AAC Holdings Inc. to 'CCC' from 'B-' and said the outlook is
negative.  According to S&P, the downgrade reflects escalated risk
of a default and risk that AAC's liquidity will not be sufficient
over the next 12 months, primarily due to the $30 million term loan
maturing in about one year.

Moody's Investors Service downgraded the corporate family rating
rating of AAC Holdings, parent company of American Addiction
Centers, Inc., to 'Caa2' from 'B3'.  The downgrade to 'Caa2'
reflects AAC's very weak third quarter results and lower guidance
for the rest of 2018, as reported by the TCR on Nov. 16, 2018.


AAC HOLDINGS: Gets NYSE Letter After Missing 10-Q Deadline
----------------------------------------------------------
AAC Holdings, Inc. received a written notice from the New York
Stock Exchange indicating that the Company is not in compliance
with the NYSE's continued listing requirements under the timely
filing criteria outlined in Section 802.01E of the NYSE Listed
Company Manual as a result of the delay in the filing of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2019.

The Company said it is diligently working to finalize its Q2 2019
Form 10-Q and expects to do so shortly, although no assurances as
to timing may be made.

The NYSE informed the Company that it will monitor the status of
the Company's Q2 2019 Form 10-Q and related public disclosures for
up to a six month period from its due date.  If the Company does
not file its Q2 2019 Form 10-Q with the SEC within six months of
its due date, the NYSE may, in its sole discretion, allow the
Company's common stock to trade for up to an additional six months
depending upon the Company's specific circumstances.
The Notice also states that the NYSE may commence delisting
proceedings at any time during the Extension Period or the
Additional Extension period, if applicable, if the circumstances
warrant.

                      About AAC Holdings

Headquartered in Brentwood, Tennessee, AAC Holdings, Inc. --
http://www.americanaddictioncenters.com-- is a provider of
inpatient and outpatient substance use treatment services for
individuals with drug addiction, alcohol addiction and co-occurring
mental/behavioral health issues.  In connection with its treatment
services, the Company performs clinical diagnostic laboratory
services and provide physician services to its clients.  As of Dec.
31, 2018, the Company operated 11 inpatient substance abuse
treatment facilities located throughout the United States, focused
on delivering effective clinical care and treatment solutions
across 1,080 inpatient beds, including 700 licensed detoxification
beds, 24 standalone outpatient centers and 4 sober living
facilities across 471 beds for a total of 1,551 combined inpatient
and sober living beds.

AAC Holdings reported a net loss of $66.71 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $17.38 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of March 31, 2019, AAC Holdings
had $480.22 million in total assets, $461.56 million in total
liabilities, and total stockholders' equity including
noncontrolling interest of $18.65 million.

BDO USA, LLP, in Nashville, Tennessee, the Company's auditor since
2011, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 12, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has
incurred a loss from operations and negative cash flows from
operations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.

                            *   *   *

In March 2019, S&P Global Ratings lowered the issuer credit rating
on AAC Holdings Inc. to 'CCC' from 'B-' and said the outlook is
negative.  According to S&P, the downgrade reflects escalated risk
of a default and risk that AAC's liquidity will not be sufficient
over the next 12 months, primarily due to the $30 million term loan
maturing in about one year.

Moody's Investors Service downgraded the corporate family rating
rating of AAC Holdings, parent company of American Addiction
Centers, Inc., to 'Caa2' from 'B3'.  The downgrade to 'Caa2'
reflects AAC's very weak third quarter results and lower guidance
for the rest of 2018, as reported by the TCR on Nov. 16, 2018.


AAC HOLDINGS: Reports Preliminary Second Quarter Results
--------------------------------------------------------
AAC Holdings, Inc. announced preliminary estimated operational and
financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2019.

Second Quarter 2019 Highlights:
(All comparisons are to first quarter ended March 31, 2019, unless
otherwise noted)

   * Average effective inpatient utilization improved to 81% from
     75%

   * Total inpatient average daily census improved 8% to 802 from
     740

   * New admissions increased 4% to 4,830 from 4,641

The Company expects to report sequential improvement in both
revenue and adjusted EBITDA for the quarter ended June 30, 2019.

The Company is also considering numerous initial proposals from
third party investment firms as a result of the strategic
transaction process being led by Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.

"We expect to show sequential improvement in our results again this
quarter," said Michael Cartwright, AAC chairman and CEO. "And as we
continue our upturn in operational results, we are excited by the
investment interest in our company and are engaged in talks with
numerous well-regarded financing sources."

                       About AAC Holdings

Headquartered in Brentwood, Tennessee, AAC Holdings, Inc. --
http://www.americanaddictioncenters.com-- is a provider of
inpatient and outpatient substance use treatment services for
individuals with drug addiction, alcohol addiction and co-occurring
mental/behavioral health issues.  In connection with its treatment
services, the Company performs clinical diagnostic laboratory
services and provide physician services to its clients.  As of Dec.
31, 2018, the Company operated 11 inpatient substance abuse
treatment facilities located throughout the United States, focused
on delivering effective clinical care and treatment solutions
across 1,080 inpatient beds, including 700 licensed detoxification
beds, 24 standalone outpatient centers and 4 sober living
facilities across 471 beds for a total of 1,551 combined inpatient
and sober living beds.

AAC Holdings reported a net loss of $66.71 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $17.38 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of March 31, 2019, AAC Holdings
had $480.22 million in total assets, $461.56 million in total
liabilities, and total stockholders' equity including
noncontrolling interest of $18.65 million.

BDO USA, LLP, in Nashville, Tennessee, the Company's auditor since
2011, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 12, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has
incurred a loss from operations and negative cash flows from
operations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.

                            *   *   *

In March 2019, S&P Global Ratings lowered the issuer credit rating
on AAC Holdings Inc. to 'CCC' from 'B-' and said the outlook is
negative.  According to S&P, the downgrade reflects escalated risk
of a default and risk that AAC's liquidity will not be sufficient
over the next 12 months, primarily due to the $30 million term loan
maturing in about one year.

Moody's Investors Service downgraded the corporate family rating
rating of AAC Holdings, parent company of American Addiction
Centers, Inc., to 'Caa2' from 'B3'.  The downgrade to 'Caa2'
reflects AAC's very weak third quarter results and lower guidance
for the rest of 2018, as reported by the TCR on Nov. 16, 2018.


ADAIR MECHANICAL: Plumbing Contractor Gets Access to Cash
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas
authorized Adair Mechanical Services, Inc., to use cash collateral
in order to fund working capital, operating expenses, and capital
expenditures arising in the ordinary course of the business, plus
up to a 10 percent variance on the budget.  The Debtor's right to
use cash collateral shall begin on Aug. 14, 2019 and shall expire
at a date to be agreed upon in writing by the Debtor and Secured
Parties -- Simmons Bank, N.A., and the Internal Revenue Service.

The Debtor shall pay Simmons Bank $2,657.86 for a monthly payment
that was due on July 27, 2019.  Thereafter, the Debtor shall remain
current on its regularly scheduled interest payments to Simmons
Bank.  Before the Petition Date, the Debtor and Simmons are parties
to a Commercial Security Agreement wherein Simmons Bank granted the
Debtor a $500,000 line of credit.  The Debtor issued a promissory
note with respect to the line of credit.  Simmons Bank has a
perfected lien and security interest in certain assets including
the Debtor’s accounts receivable.  The Court ruled that the
Debtor shall continue to keep its assets insured pursuant to the
loan agreement with Simmons Bank.

The IRS asserts a lien on all of the Debtor's assets by virtue of
federal tax liens.  The Court ruled that Simmons Bank and the IRS
are granted allowed administrative expense claims with priority
over any administrative expenses.  Simmons Bank and IRS are also
granted replacement lien, which as of the Petition Date, shall be
valid and enforceable against the Debtor.  The adequate protection
liens and administrative expense claims shall be subject to a
carve-out for professional fees and fees to the U.S. Trustee.

A copy of the Order is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/Adair_M_Cash_Order.pdf

                  About Adair Mechanical Services

Adair Mechanical Services, Inc. is a commercial and industrial
HVAC, refrigeration, and plumbing contractor with 27 combined years
of experience working with a variety of brands and systems in the
DFW Metroplex.

Based in Argyle, Texas, Adair Mechanical Services filed a voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 19-41928) on July 19, 2019.  The Hon.
Brenda T. Rhoades is assigned the Debtor's case.  Eric A. Liepins,
Esq. at the law firm of Eric A. Liepins, P.C., is the Debtor's
counsel.


ADEENIH REAL ESTATE: Taps Zamal Z. Mohamed, CPA, as Accountant
--------------------------------------------------------------
Adeenih Real Estate, LLC received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Louisiana to hire Zamal Z.
Mohamed, CPA, as accountant.

Zamal Z. Mohamed, CPA, will serve as certified public accountant to
the Debtor solely in connection with assisting the Debtor with its
preparation of tax returns and monthly operating reports.

The Debtor has agreed to pay CPA at the hourly rate of $300.00 per
hour.

Zamal Z. Mohamed, CPA, attests that neither he nor his firm
represents, will represent, holds or will hold any interest adverse
to the Debtor or the estate with respect to the matters upon which
CPA is proposed to be engaged.

The firm can be reached at:

     Zamal Z. Mohamed, CPA
     9566 Greenbriar Dr
     Baton Rouge, LA 70815
     Tel: 225-923-0653

                  About Adeenih Real Estate, LLC

On April 22, 2019, LiftForward, Inc., a creditor of Adeenih Real
Estate, filed an involuntary petition for relief under Chapter 7
against the Debtor (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 19-80396). The case
was converted to one under Chapter 11 (Bankr. W.D. La. Case no.
19-80396) on May 24, 2019.  The case has been assigned to Judge
John W. Kolwe.  Arthur A. Vingiello, Esq., at The Steffes Firm,
LLC, represents the Debtor as counsel.


AI CAUSA LLC: Seeks to Hire Integro Consultants as Accountant
-------------------------------------------------------------
AI Causa LLC, and its debtor affiliates seek authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California to
employ Integro Consultants, as accountant to the Debtor.

AI Causa LLC requires Integro Consultants to:

   a. prepare and file the Debtors' 2018 tax return and related
      documents;

   b. provide accounting assistance and advice with respect to
      the Debtors' ongoing and future tax obligations;

   c. assist the Debtors with ongoing accounting services, such
      as the preparation of quarterly financial reports and other
      financial accounting disclosures required by the bankruptcy
      court; and

   d. provide such other reasonable and related services within
      the scope of engagement as may be request by the Debtors
      from time to time.

Integro Consultants will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners                            $250-$350
     Senior Accounting Managers          $150
     Junior Accounting Managers          $125
     Administrative Support              $100

Integro Consultants will be paid a flat fee of $3,375 for the
filing of the 2018 tax return.

Integro Consultants will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Victor Diaz, partner of Integro Consultants, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Integro Consultants can be reached at:

     Victor Diaz
     INTEGRO CONSULTANTS
     2445 Fifth Ave.
     San Diego, CA 92101
     Tel: (619) 230-0707

                    About AI Causa LLC

Founded in 2012 and headquartered in San Diego, CrediautoUSA
Financial Company LLC -- http://www.crediautofinancial.com/-- has
established programs to finance vehicles sold by licensed
automobile dealerships to individuals with no credit history or
with less than perfect credit.

CrediautoUSA Financial Company LLC and its affiliate AI Causa LLC
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
S.D. Cal. Lead Case No. 19-01864) on March 30, 2019.

At the time of the filing, CrediautoUSA estimated assets of between
$1 million and $10 million and liabilities of between $10 million
and $50 million. AI CAUSA estimated assets and liabilities of
between $1 million and $10 million.

The cases are assigned to Judge Louise Decarl Adler.

CrediautoUSA is represented by the Law Offices of Kit J. Gardner
while AI Causa is represented by Higgs Fletcher & Mack LLP. Bonilla
Accounting Firm serves as their accountant.


ALPHA SCREEN: Seeks to Hire Robert O Lampl as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Alpha Screen Graphics, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to employ
Robert O Lampl Law Office, as counsel to the Debtor.

Nitle Corporation requires Robert O Lampl to:

   a. assist in the administration of the Debtor's Estate;

   b. represent the Debtor on matters involving legal issues that
      are present or are likely to arise in the case;

   c. prepare any legal documentation on behalf of the Debtor;

   d. review reports for legal sufficiency; and

   e. furnish information on legal matters regarding legal
      actions and consequences and for all necessary legal
      services connected with Chapter 11 proceedings including
      the prosecution and defense of any adversary proceedings.

Robert O Lampl will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Robert O Lampl              $450
     John P. Lacher              $400
     David L. Fuchs              $375
     Ryan J. Cooney              $275
     Sy O. Lampl                 $250
     Paralegal                   $150

Robert O Lampl will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Robert O Lampl, partner of Robert O Lampl Law Office, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Robert O Lampl can be reached at:

     Robert O Lampl, Esq.
     ROBERT O LAMPL LAW OFFICE
     223 Fourth Avenue, 4th Fl.
     Pittsburgh, PA 15222
     Tel: (412) 392-0330
     Fax: (412) 392-0335
     E-mail: rlampl@lampllaw.com

                 About Alpha Screen Graphics

Alpha Screen Graphics, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 19-22969) on July 26, 2019, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The Debtor is
represented Robert O Lampl, Esq., at Robert O Lampl Law Office.



ALTHAUS FAMILY: Seeks to Hire Diller and Rice as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Althaus Family Investors LTD, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio to employ Diller
and Rice, LLC, as counsel to the Debtor.

Althaus Family requires Diller and Rice to:

   (a) advise the Debtor with respect to its rights, powers and
       duties in this case;

   (b) advise and assist the Debtor in the preparation of its
       petition, schedules, and statement of financial affairs;

   (c) assist and advise the Debtor in connection with the
       administration of the bankruptcy case;

   (d) analyze the claims of the creditors in this case, and
       negotiate with such creditors;

   (e) investigate the acts, conduct, assets, rights, liabilities
       and financial condition of the Debtor and the Debtor's
       business;

   (f) advise and negotiate with respect to the sale of any or
       all assets of the Debtor;

   (g) investigate, file and prosecute litigation of behalf of
       the Debtor;

   (h) propose a plan of reorganization;

   (i) appear and represent the Debtor at hearings, conferences,
       and other proceedings;

   (j) prepare and review motions, applications, orders, and
       other filings filed with the Court;

   (k) institute or continue any appropriate proceedings to
       recover assets of the estate; and

   (l) provide any other services as maybe required by the
       bankruptcy case and to provide recommendations to
       employment as to her matters that are not included in
       the Debtor's counsel practice area.

Diller and Rice will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Steven L. Diller              $300
     Raymond L. Beebe              $300
     Eric R. Neuman                $275
     Adam J. Motycka               $185

Diller and Rice will be paid a retainer in the amount of $10,000.

Diller and Rice will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Steven L. Diller, partner of Diller and Rice, LLC, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Diller and Rice can be reached at:

     Steven L. Diller, Esq.
     DILLER & RICE, LLC
     124 East Main Street
     Van Wert, OH 45891
     Telephone: (419) 238-5025
     Facsimile: (419) 238-4705
     E-mail: Steven@drlawllc.com

                 About Althaus Family Investors

Althaus Family Investors Ltd., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No. 19-32357) on July 26, 2019,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The
Debtor is represented by Steven L. Diller, Esq. at Diller and Rice,
LLC.



AMYRIS INC: Delays Filing of Second Quarter Form 10-Q
-----------------------------------------------------
Amyris, Inc. filed a Form 12b-25 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission notifying the delay in the filing of its quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2019.

As Amyris previously announced, the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Company and the Board, respectively, determined
that the Company will restate (i) its interim condensed
consolidated financial statements for the quarterly and
year-to-date periods ended March 31, 2018, June 30, 2018 and Sept.
30, 2018 and (ii) its audited consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.

In addition, and as previously announced, (i) on May 15, 2019, the
Company, with the approval of the Audit Committee and the Board,
appointed BDO USA, LLP to serve as the Company's independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending Dec.
31, 2019, and determined to dismiss KPMG LLP as the Company's
independent registered public accounting firm upon completion of
KPMG's audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements as
of and for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018 as well as its re-audit of
the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and (ii) on July 3, 2019, the Company,
with the approval of the Audit Committee, took the following
actions: (A) dismissed KPMG as the Company's independent registered
public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended Dec. 31, 2018 and
2017, (B) accepted the resignation of BDO as the Company's
independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year
ending Dec. 31, 2019, prior to performing any substantive work with
respect to the audit work for that year, (C) appointed Macias Gini
& O'Connell LLP as the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal years ended Dec. 31, 2019 and 2018,
and (D) appointed BDO as the Company's independent registered
public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017.

As a result, the Company was unable to file its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2019 within the
prescribed time period without unreasonable effort and expense.
The Company has experienced a delay in the completion of the Form
10-Q and does not expect to file the Form 10-Q by the prescribed
due date allowed pursuant to Rule 12b-25.  The Company is working
to complete the preparation of its restated interim condensed
consolidated financial statements for the 2018 Non-Reliance Periods
and its Restated 2017 Financial Statements, as well as its audited
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018
and its interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2019, and intends to file
amendments to its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the 2018
Non-Reliance Periods, its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended Dec. 31, 2018 (including the Restated 2017 Financial
Statements), its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2019 and the Form 10-Q as soon as
reasonably practicable.

                          About Amyris

Amyris, Inc., based in Emeryville, California, is an industrial
biotechnology company that applies its technology platform to
engineer, manufacture and sell natural, sustainably sourced
products into the health & wellness, clean skincare, and flavors &
fragrances markets.  The Company's proven technology platform
enables it to rapidly engineer microbes and use them as catalysts
to metabolize renewable, plant-sourced sugars into large volume,
high-value ingredients.  The Company's biotechnology platform and
industrial fermentation process replace existing complex and
expensive manufacturing processes. The Company has successfully
used its technology to develop and produce five distinct molecules
at commercial volumes.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm KPMG LLP,
the Company's auditor since 2017, on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, includes an
explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and has current debt service
requirements that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.

Amyris reported net losses attributable to the company of $72.32
million in 2017, $97.33 million in 2016, and $217.95 million in
2016.  As of Sept. 30, 2018, Amyris had $122.7 million in total
assets, $323.3 million in total liabilities, $5 million in
contingently redeemable common stock, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $205.6 million.


ANGELS FOR KIDS: Behavioral Health Co. Motion Abated, Court Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hon. Karen S. Jennemann of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida ruled as abated the motion to use cash
collateral nunc pro tunc to May 16, 2019 filed by Angels for Kids
On Call 24/7, Inc.   The Court directed the Debtor’s counsel to
serve a copy of the Court order on parties-in-interest.  

               About Angels For Kids on Call 24/7

Angels For Kids On Call 24/7, Inc. --
https://www.angelsforkidsoncall.com/ -- is a for-profit behavioral
health company located in Orlando, Florida.  The Company provides
treatment of mood disorder, disorders first diagnosed in childhood,
behavioral disorders, trauma, stress and poor health, substance and
social reality problems. Its target population is high-risk,
diverse and in need of immediate care.

While the Company is uniquely suited to specialize in child and
adult care, it offers a range of treatments for people of all age
ranges.

Angels For Kids On Call 24/7, based in Orlando, FL, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-03262) on May 16, 2019.
In the petition signed by John Valencia, president, the Debtor
estimated $0 to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  The Hon. Karen S. Jennemann oversees the case.  Aldo
G. Bartolone, Jr., Esq., at Bartolone Law, PLLC, serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


APPVION INC: KNA, FTB Suit vs FAI, et al., Remains in New York
--------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiffs in the cases captioned KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
Plaintiff, v. FRANKLIN ADVISERS, INC., et al., Defendants. Fifth
Third Bank, Plaintiff, v. Franklin Advisers, Inc., et al.,
Defendants, No. 18-CV-3755 (RA), No. 18-CV-3762(RA) (S.D.N.Y.) seek
to have these actions remanded to New York State Court, while
Defendants seek to have them transferred to the United States
District Court for the District of Delaware.

Upon analysis, District Judge Ronnie Abrams consolidated the cases
and denied both parties' motions, such that this case will proceed
in the New York District Court, where it will be referred to the
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.

These cases concern a contractual dispute among creditors that
provided financing to a bankrupt Chapter 11 debtor, Appvion, Inc.,
so that the debtor could continue operating during its
reorganization. Plaintiffs Key-Bank National Association and Fifth
Third Bank initially brought this action in the Supreme Court for
the State of New York, New York County, asserting state law claims
for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and
fair dealing, tortious interference with contract, and a
declaratory judgment against Defendant Franklin Advisers, Inc. and
seven mutual funds. In short, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants'
decision to enter into a financing agreement with the Chapter 11
debtor, in which Plaintiffs declined to partake, violated the terms
of an earlier financing agreement between Plaintiffs, Defendants,
the debtor, and related parties. After Plaintiffs filed their
Complaints, Defendants timely removed these actions to this Court,
pursuant to the bankruptcy removal statute, 28 U.S.C. section 1452.


The Court holds that consolidation here is warranted. Both cases
involve the same defendants and arise out of the same contractual
dispute. The factual allegations, the legal claims and the relief
sought are all identical, as are the legal issues. Except for the
difference in Plaintiffs' names, Defendants have filed identical
briefs in both actions. Plaintiffs have filed separate briefing,
authored by different counsel, but nevertheless join in and adopt
each other's memoranda in support of their motions. Altogether,
this is a recipe for consolidation. Moreover, given the identical
procedural posture of these two cases and the fact that
consolidation is not contested, there is no risk of prejudice to
the parties. Defendants' motion to consolidate is, therefore,
granted and the Court refers to these actions as a single case in
addressing the remand and transfer motions.

Plaintiffs have failed to satisfy their burden to establish that
either permissive abstention or an equitable remand is appropriate
here. Principles of comity are not offended by declining to remand
or abstain from this action; indeed, the state law claims are not
novel or complex, which "significantly undercuts the degree to
which the state law factor weighs in favor of remand to [the] New
York courts." Nor are they as easily severable from the bankruptcy
proceedings as Plaintiffs suggest, because they involve issues that
require interpreting the Bankruptcy Court's orders. In other words,
the fact that this proceeding "arises in" the bankruptcy
proceedings strongly counsels against abstention and remand. The
state court has also "invested little or no time" in this case as
Defendants removed the underlying actions shortly after they were
filed.

Because this case constitutes a "core" bankruptcy proceeding, 28
U.S.C. section 1412 governs whether a transfer of venue is
warranted. Defendants bear the burden to show that this case should
be transferred by a preponderance of the evidence. Here, they have
failed to meet it.

To determine whether a case should be transferred under 28 U.S.C.
section 1412, courts first consider "whether the action could have
been brought in the transferee district," and if so, "whether
transfer would be an appropriate exercise of the Court's
discretion." This case could have been brought in the United States
District Court for the District of Delaware as that Court has
federal subject matter jurisdiction to hear this case for the same
reasons that this Court does, and it is not disputed that venue
there would have been proper. For that same reason, the Delaware
Bankruptcy Court--which the case would be referred to if
transferred to the Delaware District Court pursuant to that Court's
Standing Order--also has jurisdiction because that is where
Appvion's bankruptcy is pending.

Although the Delaware Bankruptcy Court is already familiar with the
legal issues in this case, and although adjudicating this case
requires interpreting that court's prior orders, this Court is
confident that the bankruptcy courts in this district are equally
capable of efficiently resolving this dispute. Tellingly,
Defendants have not cited any authority, and the Court has found
none, in which a mandatory forum selection clause entered into as
part of a post-petition agreement was overridden in the interests
of justice.

Thus, even though the Court has found that "arising in"
jurisdiction exists in this case, which would strongly suggest that
the Bankruptcy Court from which it arose is the preferred forum, in
light of the forum selection clause, the Court cannot conclude that
such a countervailing interest outweighs the interest in enforcing
the parties' agreement to have this dispute heard in the New York.
Defendants' motion to transfer is therefore denied.

A copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 26, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2L6PMLP from Leagle.com.

                     About Appvion Inc.

Appvion, Inc. -- http://www.appvion.com/-- produces thermal,
carbonless, security, inkjet, digital specialty, and colored
papers.  The Company is the largest manufacturer of direct thermal
paper in North America.  Headquartered in Appleton, Wisconsin,
Appvion operates coating and converting plants there and in West
Carrollton, Ohio and a pulp and paper mill in Roaring Spring,
Pennsylvania.  The Company employs approximately 1,400 people and
is 100% employee-owned.

Appvion, Inc., and five affiliated debtors each filed a voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12082) on Oct. 1, 2017.  The cases are
pending before the Honorable Kevin J. Carey.

Appvion Inc. disclosed total assets of $413,430,904 and total
liabilities of $714,758,194 as of Aug. 31, 2017.

DLA Piper is serving as legal counsel to Appvion, Guggenheim
Securities LLC is serving as the Company's investment banker, and
Alan Holtz of AlixPartners is serving as the Company's Chief
Restructuring Officer.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing
agent.

On Oct. 11, 2017, Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3,
appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors.  The
Committee retained Lowenstein Sandler LLP, as counsel, Klehr
Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP, as Delaware co-counsel.

On Dec. 1, 2017, the court appointed Justin R. Alberto as the fee
examiner.  He tapped Bayard, P.A., as legal counsel.

On May 14, 2018, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of
substantially all of the Debtors' assets to a group of the
Company's lenders led by Franklin Advisers, Inc.  The sale was
completed on June 13.  The transaction will significantly reduce
Appvion's debt, provide additional liquidity, and better position
Appvion to compete long-term in the evolving specialty paper market
and further invest in the innocation that has made it a market
leader.

On May 23, 2018, the Debtors filed their Combined Plan of
Liquidation and Disclosure Statement.

                           *     *     *

Following a court-sanctioned sale of the assets, Appvion Inc.
changed its name to Oldapco, Inc.


ASCOT FUND: Chapter 15 Approved over HFC Objection
--------------------------------------------------
Judge Stuart M. Bernstein of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York on August 12, 2019, issued an opinion, ruling
that the Ascot Fund, an investment fund organized under Cayman
Islands law, and involved in a liquidation proceeding there, had
its "center of its main interests" ("COMI") in the Cayman Islands
rather than New York.

The debtor, Ascot Fund Ltd., an investment fund organized under
Cayman Islands law, invested all or substantially all of its assets
in Ascot Partners L.P., a Delaware limited partnership.  Ascot
Partners, in turn, invested all or substantially all of its assets
with Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC, the vehicle
through which Bernard Madoff ran his notorious Ponzi scheme.  When
Madoff's fraud was revealed in December 2008 and the scheme
collapsed, the BLMIS investors, direct (e.g., Ascot Partners) and
indirect (e.g., Ascot Fund), lost their investments.

As a result of settlements, Ascot Partners now holds substantial
assets available for distribution and some of that money will be
down streamed to Ascot Fund, and ultimately, Ascot Fund's
shareholders.  Ascot Fund is currently in liquidation in the Cayman
Islands ("Cayman Proceeding") and one of its Joint Official
Liquidators ("JOLs"), Mr. Michael Penner ("Petitioner"), has filed
a petition under chapter 15 of the United States Bankruptcy Code
("Petition") seeking recognition of the Cayman Proceeding as a
foreign main proceeding.  

hfc Limited ("Objector"), an Ascot Fund investor, opposed the
Chapter 15 petition.  It contends that Ascot Fund's center of main
interests, or COMI, is not in the Cayman Islands and the Cayman
Proceeding cannot, therefore, be recognized as a foreign main
proceeding.

The Court conducted a one-day trial, overruled the objection and
granted the Chapter 15 petition.

The judge acknowledged that Ascot Fund's registered address has
been located in the Cayman Islands since its formation in 1992, and
hence, the Cayman Islands is presumed to be its COMI.  He added
that he Cayman-centric management of Ascot Fund did not change with
the appointment of the JVLs or the JOLs who are members of Deloitte
and based in the Cayman Islands.

"It is certainly true that Ascot Fund has not been engaged in the
investment business since the BLMIS Ponzi scheme came to light.
The same may be said of the other offshore funds and fund-of-funds,
including Fairfield, Kingate, Harley, etc., that invested all of
their money with BLMIS and are now in liquidation in their home
countries.  Since then, Ascot Fund's only significant activity has
been its participation in New York litigation.  Not coincidentally,
New York was where BLMIS operated and where the SEC, the Securities
Investor Protection Corporation, the United States Attorney and Mr.
Picard have commenced their various proceedings relating to Madoff
and BLMIS.  As a result of its direct relationship to Ascot
Partners and its indirect relationship to BLMIS, Ascot Fund was
dragged into the Merkin Litigation as a relief defendant and the
Picard Litigation as an initial and subsequent transferee of BLMIS.
To these two litigations we can now add the lawsuit originally
commenced by Contrarian in New York Supreme Court."

"This does not mean that the New York litigations define Ascot
Fund's COMI or, as the Objector implies, Ascot Fund was the
Receiver's silent partner in the Merkin and Picard Litigations or
the resulting settlements.  In the Merkin Litigation, the New York
Attorney General did not seek any relief against the Ascot Fund,
but instead, sought and obtained relief on behalf of the Ascot Fund
shareholders as well as other indirect investors in BLMIS.  As
noted, Ascot Fund, not the Receiver, approved the Merkin Settlement
and granted the releases on behalf of Ascot Fund."

A copy of the Written Opinion, from PacerMonitor.com, is available
at https://is.gd/llhY27

                         About Ascot Fund

Ascot Fund Ltd., is an investment fund organized under Cayman
Islands law.  Substantially all of its assets were invested in
Asset Partners LP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, which
in turn invested substantially all of its assets in Bernard L.
Madoff Investment Securities, LLC ("BLMIS"), the vehicle for the
Madoff Ponzi scheme.  

In the fallout after the Ponzi scheme collapsed, the New York
Attorney General sued the companies' founder, J. Ezra Merkin, for
causing investors in the two Ascot businesses, among others, to
lose money in connection with the Madoff scheme.  A receiver was
appointed for Ascot Partners.  This action was settled in 2012, and
eligible investors, including investors in the Ascot Fund, had the
option of taking a distribution from the settlement in exchange for
release of certain claims.  In a second action, the trustee for the
liquidation of BLMIS brought fraudulent transfer claims against
Ascot Fund and Ascot Partners, settling in 2018, with Ascot
Partners receiving an allowed customer claim of around half a
billion dollars in exchange for a $280 million payment to the
trustee.  As part of its allowed customer claim, Ascot Partners
received a payment of $320.6 million, as well as an entitlement to
receive an equal proportionate share of future distributions.

Ascot Fund is subject to liquidation proceedings in the Cayman
Islands, styled In the Matter of Ascot Fund Ltd. (In Voluntary
Liquidation), Cause No: FSD 3 of 2019 (IKJ) in the Grand Court of
the Cayman Islands, Financial Services Division

Michael Penner of Deloitte & Touche, as liquidator, filed a Chapter
15 case to seek U.S. recognition of Ascot Fund's liquidation in the
Cayman Islands (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-10594) on Feb. 15,
2019.  Amelia Temple Redwood Starr, Esq., at DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL
LLP, is the U.S. counsel.

Both the Cayman liquidation proceeding and the chapter 15 petition
rose out of a dispute as to how to distribute these funds to Ascot
Fund and its shareholders.  Contrarian Funds, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, controls hfc Limited, an Ascot Fund
shareholder.




ATKINS NUTRITIONALS: Moody's Reviews B1 CFR for Downgrade
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed Atkins Nutritionals Holdings,
Inc.'s B1 Corporate Family Rating, B1-PD Probability of Default
Rating, and B1 senior secured first-lien credit facility ratings on
review for downgrade following the company's announcement that it
has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Quest Nutrition,
LLC for $1.0 billion in cash. The transaction is subject to
regulatory approvals and Atkins expects it to close by the end of
2019. There was no change in Atkins' Speculative Grade Liquidity
rating of SGL-1, but liquidity will be assessed as part of the
transaction.

The review for downgrade reflects the significant increase in
Atkins' debt and leverage as a result of the acquisition. Atkins
intends to finance the transaction by using a combination of
approximately $225 million of cash on its balance sheet as well as
incremental debt. Management also stated that it anticipates
issuing equity and expects to delever to 4.0 times or less on a net
debt to adjusted EBITDA basis by fiscal year-end August 2020, based
on the company's calculation.

"Atkins will take on a significant amount of debt with this
transaction, and there are unique risks in managing two established
brands with different niches in the nutritional snacking product
segment," commented Vladimir Ronin, lead analyst for the company.
"That said, Moody's believes that management's anticipation of
deleveraging, including potential use of equity financing, the
combined company's larger presence in the fast growing nutritional
snacking category, as well as potential synergies are mitigants
that could help support company's credit profile," added Ronin.

Moody's took the following rating actions on Atkins Nutritionals
Holdings, Inc.:

On Review for Downgrade:

  Corporate Family Rating, Placed on Review for Downgrade,
  currently B1

  Probability of Default Rating, Placed on Review for Downgrade,
  currently B1-PD

  Senior Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility, Placed on
  Review for Downgrade, currently B1 (LGD4)

  Senior Secured First Lien Term Loan, Placed on Review for
  Downgrade, currently B1 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

  Outlook, Changed To Rating Under Review From Positive

RATINGS RATIONALE

Atkins' B1 CFR broadly reflects its small scale, niche product
offering in the competitive nutrition bars and shakes industry, and
a highly concentrated distribution channel with one customer
representing over 40% of sales. These factors create potential
operating volatility and require the company to continually invest
in product development and marketing to maintain its market
position. Atkins' ratings also reflects event risk including
Moody's expectation of potential debt-funded acquisitions. However,
the current rating is supported by solid credit metrics, including
modest leverage with debt-to-EBITDA of 2.3 times (incorporating
Moody's standard adjustments) and strong interest coverage with
EBITA-to-Interest of 6.4 times. Atkins' strong brand recognition in
the niche low carbohydrate, low sugar and high protein adult
nutrition sector and outsourced manufacturing support a good market
position, healthy EBITDA margin and flexible cost structure.
Moody's expects Atkins will continue to experience healthy high
single digit revenue and earnings growth over the next 12-to-18
months.

Moody's review will focus on: (1) final financing plans; (2)
deleveraging plans including how much equity will be issued and
applied to reduce outstanding debt; (3) underlying operating trends
for both companies; (4) Atkins' planned use of cash flow including
the potential for additional acquisitions and the effect on
potential debt repayment; and (5) the execution risk associated
with integrating the two companies, managing the brand portfolios,
and achieving articulated synergies. Because debt-to-EBITDA will
increase to roughly 6.9x pro forma for the transaction, the amount
of de-leveraing that can be achieved from equity financing and
future debt repayment will be a crucial element of the review.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global Packaged
Goods published in January 2017.

Atkins Nutritionals Holdings, Inc., headquartered in Denver, CO,
sells a variety of nutrition bars and shakes in the United States
and internationally through mass merchandisers, club stores,
grocery stores, and drug retailers. Atkins was merged into a
publicly traded special purpose acquisition company in 2017 with an
affiliate of Centerview Capital owning a roughly 19% stake in
Atkins' publicly-traded parent The Simply Good Foods Company. In
the last twelve months ended May 25, 2019, the company generated
approximately $492 million in revenue.


AURORA COMMERCIAL: Hires Fox Rothschild as Special Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Aurora Commercial Corp., and its debtor-affiliates, seek authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New
York to employ Fox Rothschild LLP, as special counsel to the
Debtors.

Aurora Commercial requires Fox Rothschild to:

   -- represent and provide legal services to the Debtors with
      respect to mortgage related litigation, and to file and
      prosecute objections to the claims filed by James Heron in
      the United States District Court for the District of
      Colorado, Case No.: 1:17-cv-03084-PAB-STV; and

   -- represent and provide legal services to the Debtors with
      respect to the claims filed by HSBC Bank USA, National
      Association it its capacity as trustee of certain mortgage
      loan trusts of the Debtors.

Fox Rothschild will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                $845
     Associates               $245

In the 12 months prior to the Petition Date, Fox Rothschild
rendered services to the Debtors for which the Debtors have been
invoiced in the amount of $103,936.95.

Fox Rothschild will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for Reviewing Applications
for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Filed under 11
U.S.C. Sec. 330 for Attorneys in Larger Chapter 11 Cases, the
following is provided in response to the request for additional
information:

   Question:  Did you agree to any variations from, or
              alternatives to, your standard or customary billing
              arrangements for this engagement?

   Response:  No.

   Question:  Do any of the professionals included in this
              engagement vary their rate based on the geographic
              location of the bankruptcy case?

   Response:  No.

   Question:  If you represented the client in the 12 months
              prepetition, disclose your billing rates and
              material financial terms for the prepetition
              engagement, including any adjustments during the 12
              months prepetition. If your billing rates and
              material financial terms have changed postpetition,
              explain the difference and the reasons for the
              difference.

   Response:  Fox Rothschild's billing rates and material
              financial terms in the 12 months prior to the
              Petition Date included a range of $210 per hour for
              associates to $805 per hour for partners,
              discounted by ten percent. Fox Rothschild's
              postpetition billing arrangements include a period
              rate increase as of April 1, 2019, which applied
              firmwide.

   Question:  Has your client approved your prospective budget
              and staffing plan, and, if so for what budget
              period?

   Response:  The Debtors and Fox Rothschild are currently in the
              process of formulating a budget that is consistent
              with the form of budget approved by the office of
              the U.S. Trustee.

Michael A. Rollin, partner of Fox Rothschild LLP, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Fox Rothschild can be reached at:

     Michael A. Rollin, Esq.
     FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
     1225 17th Street, Suite 2200,
     Denver, CO 80202
     Tel: (303) 292-1200
     Fax: (303) 292-1300

                 About Aurora Commercial Corp.

Aurora Commercial Corp. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lehman
Brothers Holdings Inc. that offers banking, loan servicing, and
investor services.

Aurora Commercial and its subsidiary Aurora Loan Services LLC
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 19-10843) on March 24, 2019. At the time of
the filing, Aurora Commercial estimated assets of $50 million to
$100 million and liabilities of less than $50,000.

The Debtors tapped Togut, Segal & Segal LLP as their legal counsel,
and Prime Clerk, LLC as their claims and noticing agent.



AVENUE STORES: Hires Prime Clerk as Claims Agent
------------------------------------------------
Avenue Stores, LLC and its debtors-affiliate seek authority from
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (Delaware) to
hire Prime Clerk LLC as claims and noticing agent.

The firm will oversee the distribution of notices and the
maintenance, processing and docketing of proofs of claim filed in
the Chapter 11 cases of the company and its affiliates.

Prime Clerk will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Director of Solicitation                  $215
     Solicitation Consultant                   $195
     COO and Executive VP                      No charge
     Director                                  $175-$195
     Consultant/Senior Consultant              $70-$170
     Technology Consultant                     $35-$95
     Analyst                                   $35-$55

Prime Clerk will also be reimbursed for work-related expenses
incurred.

Benjamin Steele, a partner at Prime Clerk, disclosed in court
filings that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Prime Clerk can be reached at:

     Benjamin J. Steele
     Prime Clerk LLC
     830 3rd Avenue, 9th Floor
     New York, NY 10022
     Tel: (212) 257-5450
     Email: bsteele@primeclerk.com

                    About Avenue Stores, LLC

Based in Rochelle Park, N.J., Avenue Stores, LLC --
http://www.Avenue.com-- operates Avenue(R) stores throughout the
United States.

Avenue Stores, LLC, filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Del.
Case No. 19-11842) on August 16, 2019. Betsy Lee Feldman at Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor represents the Debtor as counsel.


B.L.E. INC: Seeks to Hire Barry Gould, CPA, as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------------
B.L.E., Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Connecticut to employ Barry Gould, CPA, as
accountant.

B.L.E. requires the accountant to:

     a. assist the Debtor with the preparation of monthly operating
reports and any other financial statements required by the Debtor;

     b. assist the Debtor in developing and implementing a business
plan and plan of reorganization;

     c. assist the Debtor compile and analysis of financial
information prepared for distribution to creditor and others,
including cash flow projections, cash receipts and disbursements,
and various asset and liabilities accounts;

     d. assist in the preparation of federal and state income tax
returns and consultation regarding tax planning issues; and

     e. assist such other accounting and tax matters as the Debtor
and its counsel may request.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Partners              $180-$250
     Managers/Consultants  $170-$195
     Staff Accountants     $85-$110

Barry Gould, CPA, attests that he and his firm neither hold or
represent any interests adverse to the Debtor's estate and are
"disinterested" as that term is define under Sec 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Barry Gould, CPA
     478 Newfield Ave
     Stamford, CT 06905
     Phone: +1 203-353-3331

                       About B.L.E., Inc.

B.L.E., Inc. is in the business of commercial and industrial
machinery and equipment (except automotive and electronic) repair
and maintenance.  The Company previously sought bankruptcy
protection on Aug. 23, 2018 (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 18-51102) and
Dec. 5, 2018 (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 18-51588).

B.L.E., based in Stamford, CT, again filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 19-51059) on August 7, 2019.  In the
petition signed by Adam H. Betts, president, the Debtor disclosed
$585,767 in assets and $1,092,321 in liabilities.  The Hon. Julie
A. Manning presides over the case.  James M. Nugent, Esq. at
HARLOW, ADAMS & FRIEDMAN, P.C. represents the Debtor as counsel.


BEAUTIFUL BROWS: Trustee Hires Henry F. Sewell Jr. as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
S. Gregory Hays, the Chapter 11 Trustee of Beautiful Brows LLC,
seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Georgia to employ the Law Offices of Henry F. Sewell,
Jr., LLC, as counsel to the Trustee.

The Trustee requires Henry F. Sewell, Jr. to:

   a. review and prepare on behalf of the Trustee all pleadings,
      administrative and procedural applications, motions,
      answers, orders, reports and papers necessary to the
      administration of the estate of the Debtor and conduct
      examinations incidental to the administration of the
      bankruptcy estate;

   b. advise the Trustee with respect to the powers and duties of
      the Trustee in the administration of the bankruptcy case;

   c. attend meetings and negotiate with representatives of
      creditors and other parties in interest and advise and
      consult on the conduct of the Chapter 11 Case; and

   d. provide assistance to the Trustee as to any and all other
      action incident to the proper preservation and
      administration of the assets of the bankruptcy estate and
      perform all other necessary legal services and give all
      other necessary legal advice to the Trustee in connection
      with the Chapter 11 case.

Henry F. Sewell, Jr. will be paid at these hourly rates:

         Attorneys                  $350
         Associates                 $250

Henry F. Sewell, Jr. will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Henry F. Sewell, Jr., a partner at the Law Offices of Henry F.
Sewell, Jr., LLC, assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtors and their/its estates.

Henry F. Sewell, Jr. can be reached at:

     Henry F. Sewell, Jr., Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF HENRY F. SEWELL, JR., LLC
     2964 Peachtree Road NW, Suite 555
     Atlanta, GA 30305
     Tel: (404) 926-0053
     E-mail: hsewell@sewellfirm.com

                     About Beautiful Brows

Beautiful Brows LLC, based in Tucker, Georgia, primarily operates
in the skin care business within the personal services industry.
Beautiful Brows filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case
No. 18-66766) on Oct. 3, 2018.  In the petition signed by Saleema
Delawalla (f/k/a Fnu Saleema), member, the Debtor estimated
$100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  Jason L. Pettie, Esq., at Jason L. Pettie, P.C.,
serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.

The case is assigned to Judge Jeffery W. Cavender.

S. Gregory Hays was appointed as the Debtor's Chapter 11 trustee.
The Trustee tapped Hays Financial Consulting, LLC, as his
accountant; and Bullseye Auction & Appraisal, LLC, for the
marketing and sale of the Debtor's personal properties.



BES LLC: Electrical Service Company Gets Final OK on Cash Use
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia
permitted BES LLC, doing business as Black Electric Service, to use
cash collateral on a final basis from the Petition Date up to the
earlier of:

   (i) the appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee;
  (ii) the conversion of the Debtor's case to a case under Chapter
7 of the Bankruptcy Code;
(iii) the occurrence of a default which remains uncured;
  (iv) the dismissal by the Court of the Debtor’s Chapter 11
case; or
   (v) further Court order.
  
Judge Paul Baisier ruled that:

   (a) the Debtor shall deposit all cash collateral into the
Debtor's DIP checking accounts;
   (b) the Debtor shall pay all authorized post-petition expenses,
subject to the allowed variance of up to 10 percent of the
aggregate budget per line item per month;
   (c) the Debtor shall seek the consent of the Secured Creditors,
if actual expenses exceed the allowed variance; and  

   (d) any unspent budgeted line item may be carried over and spent
(only with respect to the same line item) in the next budget
period.
  
The parties-in-interest in the Debtor's assets before the Petition
Date are:

    * LoanBuilder -- who claims a security interest in essentially
all business assets.  According to Court documents, total repayment
amount on the LoanBuilder debt is $115,922.41 and current pay-off
amount is approximately $77,461.  Swift Financial LLC, who marketed
the LoanBuilder loan, filed a UCC financing statement perfecting a
first lien security on the debt.  The LoanBuilder Loan was funded
by WebBank, a non-affiliate of PayPal who serviced the LoanBuilder
loan together with Swift Financial;

    * National Funding, Inc. -- who also claims to have an interest
in essentially all business assets of the Debtor.  The balance on
the Debtor's obligation to National Funding is $148,799.  Current
pay-off amount is approximately $76,121;

    * Kabbage, Inc.-- who provided the Debtor a loan of $85,000.
Current pay-off amount is  $88,112.50; and

    * American Express -- who is owed $20,398 under a $20,000
Working Capital Program Agreement.

The Debtor's assets as of Petition Date is estimated at $170,963.
The Budget provides for $112,650 in cost of goods sold for August
2019 and total expenses of $42,734.  The budget submitted to the
Court extends through the end of May 2020, a copy of which, as
contained in the Order, can be accessed for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/BES_LLC_Cash_Ord.pdf

The parties-in-interest can be reached through:

(a) LoanBuilder
     c/o Swift Financial, LLC
     Ed Harycki, CEO
     3505 Silverside Road
     Wilmington DE 19810

     Counsel to Swift Financial, LLC
     James W. Hays
     Hays Potter & Martin, LLP
     3945 Holcomb Bridge Road,  Suite 300
     Peachtree Corners, Georgia 30092
     Telephone: (770) 934-8858
     Email: beau@hpmlawatl.com

     WebBank
     Kelly Barnett, President
     215 South State St., Ste 1100
     Salt Lake City, UT 84111
     Fax: 801-993-5015

(b) National Funding, Inc.
     David Gilbert, C.E.O.
     9820 Towne Centre Drive
     San Diego, CA 92121
     Fax: 888-320-0767

(c) Kabbage, Inc.
     Rob J. Frohwein, CEO
     730 Peachtree St.  NE, Ste 1100
     Atlanta, GA 30308

(d) American Express Company
     Stephen Joseph Squeri, CEO
     200 Vesey St., Lower Manhattan
     New York NY 10285

                          About BES LLC

BES LLC, doing business as Black Electric Service, sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga.
Case No. 19-57615) on May 15, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the
Debtor had estimated assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities
of less than $1 million.  The case has been assigned to Judge Paul
Baisier.  Paul Reece Marr P.C. is the Debtor's legal counsel.


BETHLEHEM-CENTER SCHOOL: Moody's Gives Ba1 Rating to 2019 Bonds
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Ba1 underlying and an A2
(fiscal agent) enhanced rating to the Bethlehem-Center School
District, PA's $3 million General Obligation Bonds, Series of 2019.
Moody's maintains the Ba1 rating on the district's issuer rating
and general obligation limited tax ratings. The outlook remains
negative.

Moody's considers the outstanding debt to be GOLT because of
limitations under Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Aa3 stable) law
(Pennsylvania Act 1, "Taxpayer Relief Act") which limit the amount
that school districts can increase property taxes. The issuer
rating is equivalent to the district's hypothetical general
obligation unlimited tax rating; there is no debt associated with
the GOULT security.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba1 issuer rating reflects the district's small tax base with
limited new development and slightly below-average resident wealth
and income. While the district's finances have historically been
quite stable, fiscal 2018 saw cash and reserves plummet as special
education and transportation costs unexpectedly jumped.

The lack of distinction between the GOLT rating and the issuer
rating reflects school districts' ability apply for exemptions to
the cap on property tax increases in order to cover debt service
and the district's full faith and credit pledge supporting all
general obligation debt.

The A2 enhanced rating reflects its current assessment of the
Pennsylvania School District Intercept Program, which provides that
state aid will be allocated to bondholders in the event that the
school district cannot meet its scheduled debt service payments.
The A2 enhanced rating reflects the presence of language in the
bond documents that requires the paying agent to trigger the state
aid intercept prior to default. As of audited 2018 financial
statements, the district's state aid revenue provides more than sum
sufficient debt service coverage.

RATING OUTLOOK

The negative outlook reflects its expectation that management will
be hard pressed to restore the district to financial stability
within the next 18 -24 months.

The A2 enhanced rating carries an outlook of stable, which mirrors
the outlook of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Aa3 stable).

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE

  - Sustained improvements to reserves and liquidity

  - Significant increase in the tax base

  - Upgrade of the Commonwealth's rating (enhanced)

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE

  - Failure to improve finances

  - Contraction of the tax base and deterioration of resident
wealth and income

  - Downgrade of the Commonwealth's rating (enhanced)

LEGAL SECURITY

The outstanding bonds are backed by the district's full faith and
credit pledge to levy ad valorem taxes subject to the limits of
Pennsylvania Act 1, "Taxpayer Relief Act."

The bonds are enhanced by the Pennsylvania School District
Intercept Program.

The intercept program is not a general obligation guarantee of the
Commonwealth, and in fact, there have been times when the state has
not distributed any aid to school districts, as was the case during
the 2016 state budget impasse. However, with implementation of Act
85 in 2016, the state has ensured that intercept payments, for the
benefit of bond debt service, will be made even in the absence of
an appropriation budget.

USE OF PROCEEDS

Proceeds of the bonds will be used to finance various capital
projects, especially roof replacement and HVAC improvement.

PROFILE

Bethlehem-Center School District is located in the southeast corner
of Washington County, PA (Aa2), approximately 28 miles southeast of
the City of Pittsburgh, PA (A1 stable). The district covers an area
of approximately 55 square miles which includes the Boroughs of
Beallsville, Centerville, Deemston and Marianna and the Townships
of East Bethlehem and West Bethlehem. The district operates one
elementary school, one middle school and one high school and has an
enrollment of approximately 1,164 students.

METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in the underlying rating was US
Local Government General Obligation Debt published in December
2016. The principal methodology used in the enhanced rating was
State Aid Intercept Programs and Financings published in December
2017.


BIG JACK: S&P Discontinues 'B' Issue-Level Rating Following Sale
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings discontinued all its ratings on Birmingham,
Al.-based quick service restaurant Big Jack Holdings L.P. (Big
Jack; B/Stable/--).

S&P also discontinued its 'B' issue-level rating and '3' recovery
rating on Big Jack's senior secured credit facility consisting of a
$30 million revolver and $275 million term loan.

This follows the redemption of the company's debt in accordance
with the terms of the credit facility after the restaurant's
private equity owners sold the company to an undisclosed
third-party. The transaction closed on Aug. 19, 2019.



BLACK RIDGE: Reports $631K Net Loss for Second Quarter
------------------------------------------------------
Black Ridge Oil & Gas, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
attributable to the Company of $630,687 on $0 of total revenues for
the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to a net loss
attributable to the Company of $531,575 on $0 of total revenues for
the three months ended June 30, 2018.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company reported a net
loss attributable to the Company of $1.30 million on $0 of total
revenues compared to a net loss attributable to the Company of
$1.16 million on $0 of total revenues for the six months ended June
30, 2018.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $142.42 million in total
assets, $274,843 in total liabilities, $141.92 million in
redeemable non-controlling interest, and $222,469 in total
stockholders' equity.

The Company has no revenue source presently.  Based on projections
of cash expenditures in the Company's current business plan, the
cash on hand would be insufficient to fund the Company's general
and administrative expenses over the next year.

As of June 30, 2019 the Company had positive working capital of
$101,535.  Included in current liabilities as of June 30, 2019 are
liabilities of Black Ridge Acquisition Corp., the Company's
sponsored special purpose acquisition company, for current income
taxes and franchise fees totaling $119,553 which may be paid from
interest earned on the Trust Account assets.

Net cash used in operating activities was $2,127,947 and $1,194,598
for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, a
period over period increase of $933,349.  The increase was
primarily due to an increase of $158,912 in general and
administrative expenses and changes in working capital accounts.
Changes in working capital from operating activities resulted in a
decrease in cash of $438,433 in the six months ended June 30, 2019
as compared to an increase in cash of $63,251 for the same period
in the previous year, the year over year decrease of $501,684
primarily driven by changes in income taxes payable between
periods.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $892,514 and $130,621
for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  In
both periods the cash was provided from withdrawals from the Trust
Account to pay for income taxes and franchise fees.

The Company had no financing activities in either the 2019 period
or the 2018 period.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company's balance of cash and cash
equivalents was $268,067.  The Company's plan for satisfying its
cash requirements for the next twelve months is through additional
management service fees generated from new partners and additional
financing in the form of equity or debt as needed.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/JksZjX

                         About Black Ridge

Black Ridge Oil & Gas -- http://www.blackridgeoil.com/-- is
focused on acquiring, investing in, and managing the oil and gas
assets for its partners.  The Company continues to pursue asset
acquisitions in all major onshore unconventional shale formations
that may be acquired with capital from its existing joint venture
partners or other capital providers.  Additionally, as the sponsor
and manager of Black Ridge Acquisition Corp., the Company is
focused on assisting BRAC in its efforts to identify a prospective
target business for a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition or
other similar business combination.  Black Ridge is based in
Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Black Ridge reported a net loss attributable to the Company of
$344,014 for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss
attributable to the Company of $392,529 for the year ended Dec. 31,
2017.  As of March 31, 2019, Black Ridge had $142.95 million in
total assets, $790,064 in total liabilities, $141.34 million in
redeemable non-controlling interest, and $825,269 in total
stockholders' equity.

M&K CPAS, PLLC, in Houston, Texas, the Company's auditor since
2010, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018,
citing that the Company suffered a net loss from operations and
negative cash flows from operations, which raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.


BLACK RIDGE: Signs Consulting Agreement with Allied Esports
-----------------------------------------------------------
Black Ridge Oil & Gas, Inc., has entered into a consulting service
agreement with Allied Esports Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware
corporation under which, Black Ridge has agreed to provide certain
services required by Allied Esports, including, without limitation,
administrative and accounting services through Dec. 31, 2019.

Under the Consulting Agreement, Black Ridge is entitled to
specified payment for the Consulting Services to be paid on the
date of execution and the first day of each following month with
expected aggregate total payments of approximately $375,000 over
the term of the Consulting Agreement.  In addition, the Consulting
Agreement specifies that Black Ridge must maintain adequate
accounting records which in reasonable detail fairly reflect the
Consulting Services provided to Allied Esports and provide Allied
Esports's representatives, advisers and consultants the right to
review and examine the books and records of Black Ridge which
relate to the provisions of the Consulting Services at any
reasonable time during Black Ridge's regular business hours with
any fees and expenses relating to the audit right borne by Allied
Esports.

The Consulting Agreement also includes standard representations,
warranties and indemnification provisions.

                        About Black Ridge

Black Ridge Oil & Gas -- http://www.blackridgeoil.com/-- is
focused on acquiring, investing in, and managing the oil and gas
assets for its partners.  The Company continues to pursue asset
acquisitions in all major onshore unconventional shale formations
that may be acquired with capital from its existing joint venture
partners or other capital providers.  Additionally, as the sponsor
and manager of Black Ridge Acquisition Corp., the Company is
focused on assisting BRAC in its efforts to identify a prospective
target business for a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition or
other similar business combination.  Black Ridge is based in
Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Black Ridge reported a net loss attributable to the Company of
$344,014 for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss
attributable to the Company of $392,529 for the year ended Dec. 31,
2017.  As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $142.42 million in
total assets, $274,843 in total liabilities, $141.92 million in
redeemable non-controlling interest, and $222,469 in total
stockholders' equtiy.

M&K CPAS, PLLC, in Houston, Texas, the Company's auditor since
2010, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018,
citing that the Company suffered a net loss from operations and
negative cash flows from operations, which raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.


BODY RENEW: Committee Taps Hirschler Fleischer as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Body Renew
Winchester II, LLC seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Virginia (Harrisonburg) to retain
Hirschler Fleischer, P.C. as its legal counsel.

The services that Hirschler Fleischer will render are:

     (a) advise and assist the committee in understanding its
powers and duties under the Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy
Rules, and perform other services that are in the interests of
those represented by the committee;

     (b) assist, advise, and represent the committee in its
consultations with the Debtor regarding the administration of the
Debtor's Chapter 11 case;

     (c) assist, advise and represent the committee in evaluating
the Debtor's assets, liabilities, overall financial conditions, and
the operations of its business, including, but not limited to,
investigating the extent and validity of liens, and participating
in and reviewing any proposed asset sales, asset dispositions,
financing agreements, and cash collateral/debtor-in-possession
financing issues;

     (d) assist, advise and represent the committee in any matter
relevant to reviewing and determining the Debtor's rights and
obligations under unexpired leases and/or executory contracts;

     (e) assist, advise and represent the committee in its
participation in the negotiation, formulation, and drafting of a
plan or plans of liquidation or reorganization;

     (f) advise the committee on issues relating to the appointment
of a trustee or examiner under section 1104 of the Bankruptcy
Code;

     (g) assist, advise and represent the committee in the
evaluation of claims and on any litigation matters; and

     (h) provide such other legal services to the committee as may
be necessary.

Robert Westermann, Esq., the attorney who will be providing the
services, charges $460 per hour and Alexander R. Kalyniuk, an
associate, will charge $270 per hour.

Mr. Westermann, a shareholder of Hirschler, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Robert S. Westermann, Esq.
     Hirschler Fleischer, P.C.
     The Edgeworth Building
     2100 East Cary Street
     P.O. Box 500
     Richmond, VA 23218-0500
     Telephone: 804.771.9500
     Facsimile: 804.644.0957
     E-mail: rwestermann@hf-law.com

                  About Body Renew Winchester

Body Renew Winchester II, LLC and Body Renew Winchester, LLC are
privately held companies in the health and fitness clubs and gyms
business.

Body Renew Winchester II and Body Renew Winchester filed voluntary
petitions seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. W.D. Va. Case No. 19-50547 and 19-50548) on June 27, 2019.
The petitions were signed by Jeremy W. Wright, manager.  The
Debtors each estimated $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.

James P. Campbell, Esq. at Campbell Flannery, P.C. represents the
Debtors as counsel.

A committee of unsecured creditors was appointed on July 22, 2019.
The committee is represented by Hirschler Fleischer, P.C.


BODY RENEW: Hires Michael Callahan and Associates as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------------------
Body Renew Winchester II, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Virginia to employ
Michael Callahan and Associates, LLC, as accountant.

Body Renew requires Michael Callahan and Associates to:

     -- provide accounting services to the Debtor;

     -- provide monthly bookkeeping and payroll services; and

     -- prepare the Debtor's 2018 income tax returns.

Michael Callahan and Associates will be paid at the hourly rate of
$750 for bookkeeping and payroll services. The Firm will be paid
$3,500 for income tax preparations.

Michael Callahan and Associates will also be reimbursed for
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Michael A. Callahan, partner of Michael Callahan and Associates,
LLC, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as
the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and
does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its
estates.

Michael Callahan and Associates can be reached at:

     Michael A. Callahan
     MICHAEL CALLAHAN AND ASSOCIATES, LLC
     123 South Loudoun Street
     Winchester, VA 22601
     Tel: (540) 999-6123
     Fax: (703) 894-2675

                About Body Renew Winchester II

Body Renew Winchester II, LLC, based in Stephens City, VA, and its
debtor-affiliates, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Va.
Lead Case No. 19-50547) on June 27, 2019.  In the petition signed
by Jeremy W. Wright, manager, the Debtors estimated $0 to $50,000
in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  The Hon.
Rebecca B. Connelly oversees the case.  James P. Campbell, Esq., at
Campbell Flannery, P.C., serves as bankruptcy counsel to the
Debtor.


BODY RENEW: Hires R.L. Rasmus Auctioneers as Auctioneer
-------------------------------------------------------
Body Renew Winchester II, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Virginia to employ
R.L. Rasmus Auctioneers, Inc., as auctioneer to the Debtor.

Body Renew requires R.L. Rasmus Auctioneers to auction and sell the
Debtor's various gym equipment and restaurant equipment held in a
storage facility.

R.L. Rasmus Auctioneers will be paid a commission of 20% of the
gross sales total generated from the sale of the Debtor's assets.

Christopher Rasmus, a partner at R.L. Rasmus Auctioneers, Inc.,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

R.L. Rasmus Auctioneers can be reached at:

     Christopher Rasmus
     R.L. RASMUS AUCTIONEERS, INC.
     201 Yoakum Parkway, Unit 54
     Alexandria, VA 22310
     Tel: (703) 768-9000
     Fax: (703) 997-8957

                About Body Renew Winchester II

Body Renew Winchester II, LLC, based in Stephens City, VA, and its
debtor-affiliates, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Va.
Lead Case No. 19-50547) on June 27, 2019.  In the petition signed
by Jeremy W. Wright, manager, the Debtors estimated $0 to $50,000
in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  The Hon.
Rebecca B. Connelly oversees the case.  James P. Campbell, Esq., at
Campbell Flannery, P.C., serves as bankruptcy counsel to the
Debtor.


BRADLEY INVESTMENTS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Bradley Investments, Inc.
           d/b/a Timbercreek Golf Club
        9650 Timbercreek Blvd
        Spanish Fort, AL 36527-5604

Business Description: Bradley Investments, Inc. dba Timbercreek
                      Golf Club, is in the golf club business.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 22, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Alabama (Mobile)

Case No.: 19-12908

Judge: Hon. Henry A. Callaway

Debtor's Counsel: Irvin Grodsky, Esq.
                  GRODSKY AND OWENS
                  454 Dauphin St
                  Mobile, AL 36602-2404
                  Tel: (251) 433-3657
                  E-mail: igpc@irvingrodskypc.com
                          igrodsky@irvingrodskypc.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Robert Bradley, owner/general manager.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/alsb19-12908.pdf


BRIGHT MOUNTAIN: Closes Share Exchange and Plan of Merger Deal
--------------------------------------------------------------
Effective Aug. 15, 2019, Bright Mountain Media, Inc., closed the
previously announced Share Exchange Agreement and Plan of Merger to
acquire Slutzky & Winshman Ltd. d/b/a/ S&W Media Group in a cash
and stock transaction.

S&W, headquartered in Tel Aviv, Israel, is a data-driven marketing
company, which utilizes programmatic solutions for over the top, or
("OTT"), video and mobile advertising.  Leveraging machine learning
data, S&W provides technology for content creators to deploy,
distribute and monetize their content.  Israel is known globally as
a digital advertising and innovation hub.  With the addition of S&W
Media, Bright Mountain Media, Inc. now has a solid presence in the
heart of the hub, Tel Aviv.

Kip Speyer, chairman and CEO of Bright Mountain Media, said that
"The collective efforts of the Bright and S&W teams have permitted
us to reach this point and it will be a "win win" for both of us.
We believe now more than ever that the consolidation of our
businesses will permit us to grow rapidly."  Mr. Speyer reiterated
that, "Recognizing the global presence of S&W Media and its young,
creative and aggressive leadership makes this acquisition a major
game changer for us.  We believe that a global presence with
offices in Israel will permit us to accelerate our growth
worldwide."

"Today's announcement with Bright Mountain is very exciting for us
after months of work to reach this Closing Date.  We look forward
to working together with Kip Speyer and his management team and
believe that the combination of our companies will facilitate our
ability to take advantage of global opportunities and grow our
combined company internally, as well as with strategic
acquisitions," said Messrs. Slutzky and Winshman.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement and upon the terms and subject to
the conditions set forth therein, on the closing date, the Company
acquired all of the outstanding shares of S&W from the S&W
shareholders in exchange for (i) an aggregate of 13,000,000 shares
of the Company's common stock, and (ii) promissory notes in the
aggregate principal amount of $750,000.

In addition, at Closing S&W entered into a two-year employment
agreement with Joey Winshman to serve as its chief marketing
officer.  At the same time, Mr. Winshman was appointed to the
Company's board of directors.  At Closing the Company also entered
into two-year Consulting Agreements with Messrs.  Nadav Slutsky and
Eli Desatnik.

As is customary following the closing and upon regulatory approval
from the Israeli Government, the merger will become effective.

                      About Bright Mountain

Based in Boca Raton, Fla., Bright Mountain Media, Inc. --
http://www.brightmountainmedia.com/-- is a digital media holding
company whose primary focus is connecting brands with consumers as
a full advertising services platform.  Bright Mountain Media's
assets include an ad network, an ad exchange platform and 25
websites (owned and/or managed) that provide content, services and
products.  The websites are primarily geared for a young, male
audience with several that focus on active, reserve and retired
military audiences as well as law enforcement and first
responders.

Bright Mountain reported a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $5.33 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018,
compared to a net loss attributable to common shareholders of $3.01
million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of June 30, 2019, the
Company had $4.99 million in total assets, $1.60 million in total
liabilities, and $3.38 million in total shareholders' equity.

EisnerAmper LLP, in Iselin, New Jersey, the Company's auditor since
2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 12, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, stating that the Company has
experienced recurring net losses, cash outflows from operating
activities, and has an accumulated deficit that raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


BRIGHT MOUNTAIN: Reports $705K Net Loss for Second Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------
Bright Mountain Media, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
attributable to common shareholders of $704,699 on $716,594 of
advertising revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2019, compared to a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $952,800 on $291,276 of advertising revenues for
the three months ended June 30, 2018.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company reported a net
loss attributable to common shareholders of $1.48 million on $1.80
million of advertising revenues compared to a net loss attributable
to common shareholders of $1.91 million on $974,334 of advertising
revenues for the same period last year.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $4.99 million in total assets,
$1.60 million in total liabilities, and $3.38 million in total
shareholders' equity.

Bright Mountain said, "As we continue our efforts to grow our
business, we expect that our monthly cash operating overhead will
continue to increase as we add personnel, although at a lesser
rate, and we are not able at this time to quantify the amount of
this expected increase.  In 2019 we implemented policies and
procedures around cash collections to prevent the aging of accounts
receivables that was experienced in 2018.  Cash collection efforts
have been successful, and we feel that we have appropriately
reserved for uncollectible amounts at June 30, 2019."

The Company used net cash in operating activities of ($1,069,941)
for the six months ended June 30, 2019.  The Company had an
accumulated deficit of ($18,457,104) at June 30, 2019.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                        https://is.gd/Q0XrV1

                        About Bright Mountain

Based in Boca Raton, Fla., Bright Mountain Media, Inc. --
http://www.brightmountainmedia.com/-- is a digital media holding
company whose primary focus is connecting brands with consumers as
a full advertising services platform.  Bright Mountain Media's
assets include an ad network, an ad exchange platform and 25
websites (owned and/or managed) that provide content, services and
products.  The websites are primarily geared for a young, male
audience with several that focus on active, reserve and retired
military audiences as well as law enforcement and first responders.


Bright Mountain reported a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $5.33 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018,
compared to a net loss attributable to common shareholders of $3.01
million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of March 31, 2019,
Bright Mountain had $5.39 million in total assets, $1.88 million in
total liabilities, and $3.51 million in total shareholders'
equity.

EisnerAmper LLP, in Iselin, New Jersey, the Company's auditor since
2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 12, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, stating that the Company has
experienced recurring net losses, cash outflows from operating
activities, and has an accumulated deficit that raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


BRUNO ONE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
--------------------------------------------
Debtor: Bruno One Inc.
        537 Bamboo Lane
        Clearwater, FL 33764

Business Description: Bruno One Inc. is a privately held company
                      engged in activities related to real estate.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: Augus 22, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida (Tampa)

Case No.: 19-07927

Judge: Hon. Catherine Peek McEwen

Debtor's Counsel: Gabriel Strine, Esq.
                  STRINE LEGAL SERVICES, PLLC
                  8451 W Linebaugh Ave
                  Tampa, FL 33625
                  Tel: (813) 373-3217
                  E-mail: grstrine@strinelegalservices.co

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Caruso Bruno Ivan, president.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb19-07927.pdf


BUFFALO ORIGINAL: Court Approves Debtor Stipulation with M&T Bank
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of New York
approved the stipulation entered into by Buffalo Original Wings,
Inc., doing business as Anchor Bar, and M&T Bank to use cash
collateral pursuant to a budget through November 3, 2019.

The Stipulation provides that:

   (a) the Debtor reaffirms granting to M&T rollover replacement
liens as of the Petition Date on all of the Debtor's property;

   (b) M&T holds a valid, perfected and enforceable first priority
liens on all of the Debtor's estate of the same nature as that held
as of the Petition Date;

   (c) the liens, pledges and security interests granted M& T
pursuant to this Stipulation are in addition to and not in
substitution for M&T's existing security interests;

   (d) the Debtor shall pay additional adequate protection in
regular monthly cash payments pursuant to the Loan Documents,
beginning Aug. 1, 2019;

   (e) the Debtor will keep hazard insurance in place; and

   (f) M&T may seek additional protection as it may require with
respect to the collateral and the cash collateral.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor owes M&T Bank $144,231, plus
accrued interest, fees and expenses with respect to the Loan
Agreement.  If the Debtor defaults, the Debtor must cure the
default within 10 days after due notice has been served; otherwise
the Stipulation will immediately terminate.

                   About Buffalo Original Wings

Buffalo Original Wings, Inc., doing business as Anchor Bar, owns
and operates a bar and restaurant in Buffalo, New York --
https://www.anchorbar.com/ -- most famous for its spicy chicken
wings known as Buffalo wings.  See https://www.anchorbar.com/ for
more information.

Buffalo Original Wings sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
W.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-11526) on July 30, 2019.  As of the Petition
Date, Debtor disclosed total assets of $802,372 and total
liabilities of $1,149,231.  BAUMEISTER DENZ LLP, led by partner
Arthur G. Baumeister, Jr., is the Debtor's counsel.


BUFORD ELECTRIC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Buford Electric, LLC
        Post Office Box 64333
        Fayetteville, NC 28306

Business Description: Buford Electric, LLC is an electrical
                      company in Fayetteville, North Carolina.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 24, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of North Carolina
       (Fayeteville Division)

Case No.: 19-03901

Debtor's Counsel: Travis Sasser, Esq.
                  SASSER LAW FIRM
                  2000 Regency Parkway, Suite 230
                  Cary, NC 27518
                  Tel: (919) 319-7400
                  Fax: (919) 657-7400
                  E-mail: travis@sasserbankruptcy.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Thomas Buford, member-manager.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/nceb19-03901.pdf


C3 VENTURES: Gets Court Approval to Hire Expert Witness
-------------------------------------------------------
C3 Ventures, LLC received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Florida to employ Andrew Atkins, Esq.,
an attorney employed with Shevlin Atkins, P.A., to serve as expert
witness.

The Debtor tapped the attorney to serve as expert witness at the
evidentiary hearing on its motion to assume a lease with BB
University Drive, LLC.  Mr. Atkins will charge an hourly rate of
$400.

Mr. Atkins disclosed in court filings that he is "disinterested"
within the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Mr. Atkins maintains an office at:

     Andrew Atkins, Esq.
     Shevlin Atkins, P.A.
     1111 Kane Concourse, Suite 619
     Bay Harbor Islands, FL  33154
     Phone: (305) 868-0304
     Fax: (305) 868-0338

                   About C3 Ventures, LLC

C3 Ventures, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-14200) on March 29, 2019, disclosing under $1
million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is represented
by Michael S. Hoffman, Esq., at Hoffman Larin & Agnetti, P.A.


CALIFORNIA PIZZA: Moody's Cuts CFR to Caa1 & Alters Outlook to Neg.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded California Pizza Kitchen,
Inc.'s Corporate Family Rating to Caa1 from B3, Probability of
Default Rating to Caa1-PD from B3-PD, and ratings on the company's
$30 million senior secured first lien revolver and senior secured
first lien term loan to B3 from B2. The company's $75 million
senior secured second lien term loan rated Caa2 was affirmed and
the outlook was changed to negative from stable.

"CPK's weak comparable same restaurant sales and operating
performance has resulted in debt protection metrics below
expectations" stated Adam McLaren, Moody's Analyst. Weak traffic
levels and wage inflation continue to pressure the company's
margins and credit metrics, resulting in high leverage and weak
interest coverage. Tightening covenant headroom, weakened liquidity
and refinancing risk additionally constrain the company.

Downgrades:

Issuer: California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. (CPK)

Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to Caa1-PD from B3-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to Caa1 from B3

Senior Secured 1st Lien Revolving Credit Facility, Downgraded to B3
(LGD3) from B2 (LGD3)

Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loan, Downgraded to B3 (LGD3) from B2
(LGD3)

Affirmations:

Issuer: California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. (CPK)

Senior Secured 2nd Lien Term Loan, Affirmed Caa2 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. (CPK)

Outlook, Changed To Negative From Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

CPK's Caa1 Corporate Family Rating is constrained by its high
leverage, modest interest coverage, small scale and geographic
concentration relative to comparable casual dining concepts. The
company is further constrained by the challenging operating
environment which includes soft same store sales growth, with weak
traffic trends, and increased labor expense as a percentage of
restaurant sales which continue to pressure profitability margins.
Tightened covenant cushion and the potential need to amend/cure its
covenant upon step down at year end to remain compliant, plus
burgeoning refinancing risk additionally constrain the rating. The
company benefits from a high level of brand awareness, various
strategic initiatives to enhance the customer experience and reduce
costs, and success of newer format stores with average unit volumes
higher than its average restaurant.

The negative outlook reflects its expectation that CPK will
continue to face challenging same store sales and traffic trends
that will weigh on the company's credit metrics, that will further
exacerbate tightening covenant cushion and growing refinancing
risk.

The ratings could be downgraded if debt/EBITDA increased to over
7x, with EBIT/interest maintained below 1.0x on a sustained basis.
Weak same store sales trends and any deterioration in the company's
liquidity profile could also pressure the ratings, including
inability to maintain covenant compliance or refinance its debt
maturities.

The ratings could be upgraded if the company demonstrates positive
same store sales performance -- including improving traffic trends
-- with debt/EBITDA sustained near 6x and EBIT/interest expense
over 1.0x. An upgrade would also require the company to maintain
adequate liquidity.

California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. is an owner, operator and franchisor
with 243 casual dining restaurants in 30 states and 10 countries.
The company is majority owned by Golden Gate Capital and reported
revenue of approximately $603 million for the last twelve-month
period ended June 30, 2019.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Restaurant
Industry published in January 2018.


CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE: Moody's Ups Series A-2 2007 Bonds to Caa2
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has upgraded the underlying rating on the
California Statewide Communities Development Authority's Taxable
Pension Obligation Bonds 2007 Series A-2 to Caa2 from Caa3, and has
revised the bonds outlook to positive from stable. The bonds are
also currently insured by AMBAC. This rating action applies to
$19.3 million remaining fully accreted value.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The upgrade to Caa2 reflects the improved credit quality of the
largest pool participant, the town of Paradise, which made a
required deposit with the bond trustee on August 1 for its next
debt service payment. The town's ability to make this payment was
based on the receipt of insurance settlement funds and state
backfill payments from the State of California for lost fiscal 2019
general fund revenues as a result of the almost complete
destruction of the town's tax base by the November 2018 Camp Fire.
In addition to normal insurance settlements, California passed
legislation assuring Paradise backfill payments for lost property
taxes for three consecutive years.

The Caa2 rating on the pooled bonds reflects the weighted average
of its internal assessment of the credit quality for each of the
pool participants. The pool participants' respective, current
shares of remaining debt service outstanding are as follows:
Paradise (40.2%), the city of Palm Springs (26.2%), and the city of
Port Hueneme (33.5%). Paradise has a declining share of the pool
over time, but remains a material share through final maturity in
fiscal 2031, with Port Hueneme being the only pool participant in
fiscal 2032 through fiscal 2035.

The heavy physical and economic damage to the town of Paradise has
devastated its financial position, realistically eliminating any
short-term ability to pay debt service, except with one-time
funding sources such as those used for the recent deposit with the
trustee, which will be used to pay bondholders on June 1, 2020. The
town's ability to make the subsequent payments remains limited and
will depend on the town's willingness to prioritize its use of
unrestricted funds for debt service over its operational needs. The
next possible default would be for a payment due to bondholders on
June 1, 2021. Even if the city defaults in 2021, bondholders are
likely to be made whole, as the debt is insured by AMBAC.

In consideration of the small size of the pool and absence of
cross-collateralization among the participants, the rating is based
its weak-link-plus approach to pooled obligations. This approach
allows for a lift of up to two notches above the lowest rated
participant's individual obligation. The uplift cannot exceed the
weighted average credit quality of the pool participants, with the
weights being each participant's current proportionate share of the
debt service. If one of the participants has a speculative-grade
rating, the rating cannot exceed Ba1.

RATING OUTLOOK

The positive outlook reflects its view that the agreed upon
settlement funds amount between Paradise and Pacific Gas & Electric
of $270 million significantly improves the city's ability to make
its scheduled debt service payments or to cure any near-term
payment defaults on its share of debt service depending on timing
of the receipt of settlement funds. In either case the settlement
should provide for an increased expected recovery level for bond
holders.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE

  - The town's ability and willingness to prioritize debt service
over other service and infrastructure needs

  - Rapid economic recovery and rebuilding of Paradise

  - Improvement in the weighted average credit quality of pool
participants

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE

  - A protracted default by the Town of Paradise

  - Inability or lack of willingness to repay its POB debt

  - Decline in the credit quality of the two currently stronger
pool participants

LEGAL SECURITY

Payments by the participating municipalities to the authority for
their share of debt service are their unconditional obligations,
payable from any legally available funds. There is no cross
collateralization or cross default. Therefore, no municipality is
responsible for the bond repayments of any other municipality, and
default of one municipality will not constitute default of any
other municipality. Additionally, the authority's general funds are
not pledged for payment of the bonds. There is no debt service
reserve fund.

Under the terms of separate trust indentures, the participating
municipalities make debt service payments to the trustee, Wells
Fargo Bank, NA (Aa1). The terms in the agreements are similar
except for the debt service schedules. Payments sufficient to pay
the municipality's proportionate share of principal and interest on
the bonds are due on August 1 each year, ten months in advance of
the payment date for principal and accreted interest. Once the
funds are received by the trustee they are deposited into a bond
fund, where there are held until they are transferred for payment
to bondholders. If any funds remain after full debt service has
been paid, those funds will be returned to the appropriate
municipality by the trustee. Failure to pay principal and/or
interest by August 1 constitutes a default under the trust
agreement. If a default occurs, the municipality is given a 60 day
period by the trustee to cure the default.

PROFILE

The California Statewide Communities Development Authority's
Pension Obligation Bond Program provides an opportunity for local
governments in California to finance their unfunded pension
liabilities. Each of the local governments issued pension
obligation bonds, which were sold to the authority to finance all
or a portion of their unfunded pension liability.


CAREVIEW COMMUNICATIONS: Incurs $3.4 Million Net Loss in Q2
-----------------------------------------------------------
Careview Communications, Inc., filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting a
net loss of $3.40 million on $1.54 million of net revenues for the
three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to a net loss of $4.54
million on $1.51 million of net revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2018.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company reported a net
loss of $6.48 million on $3.02 million of net revenues compared to
a net loss of $9.34 million on $3.09 million of net revenues for
the same period during the prior year.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $7.38 million in total assets,
$91.55 million in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $84.17 million.

The Company's cash position at June 30, 2019 was approximately
$879,000.

CareView stated, "Accounting standards require management to
evaluate our ability to continue as a going concern for a period of
one year subsequent to the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q
("evaluation period").  As such, we have evaluated if cash and cash
equivalents on hand and cash generated through operating activities
would be sufficient to sustain projected operating activities
through August 14, 2020.  We anticipate that our current resources,
along with cash generated from operations, will not be sufficient
to meet our cash requirements throughout the evaluation period,
including funding anticipated losses and scheduled debt maturities.
We expect to seek additional funds from a combination of dilutive
and/or non-dilutive financings in the future.  Because such
transactions have not been finalized, receipt of additional funding
is not considered probable under current accounting standards.  If
we do not generate sufficient cash flows from operations and obtain
sufficient funds when needed, we expect that we would scale back
our operating plan by deferring or limiting some, or all, of our
capital spending, reducing our spending on travel, and/or
eliminating planned headcount additions, as well as other cost
reductions to be determined.  Because such contingency plans have
not been finalized (the specifics would depend on the situation at
the time), such actions also are not considered probable for
purposes of current accounting standards.  Because, under current
accounting standards, neither future cash generated from operating
activities, nor management's contingency plans to mitigate the risk
and extend cash resources through the evaluation period, are
considered probable, substantial doubt is deemed to exist about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  As we continue
to incur losses, our transition to profitability is dependent upon
achieving a level of revenues adequate to support its cost
structure.  We may never achieve profitability, and unless and
until doing so, we intend to fund future operations through
additional dilutive or non-dilutive financings.  There can be no
assurances, however, that additional funding will be available on
terms acceptable to us, if at all."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                         https://is.gd/J03rYj

                     About CareView Communications

CareView Communications, Inc. -- http://www.care-view.com/-- is a
provider of products and on-demand application services for the
healthcare industry, specializing in bedside video monitoring,
software tools to improve hospital communications and operations,
and patient education and entertainment packages.  Its proprietary,
high-speed data network system is the next generation of patient
care monitoring that allows real-time bedside and point-of-care
video monitoring designed to improve patient safety and overall
hospital costs.  The entertainment packages and patient education
enhance the patient's quality of stay.  CareView is dedicated to
working with all types of hospitals, nursing homes, adult living
centers and selected outpatient care facilities domestically and
internationally.  The Company's corporate offices are located at
405 State Highway 121 Bypass, Suite B-240, Lewisville, TX 75067.

Careview Communications reported a net loss of $16.07 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $20.07
million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of March 31, 2019,
the Company had $8.21 million in total assets, $89.04 million in
total liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $80.83
million.

BDO USA, LLP, in Dallas, Texas, the Company's auditor since 2010,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated March
29, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, stating that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and has accumulated losses since
inception that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


CARROLL REALTY: Seeks to Hire Burns Law Firm as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Carroll Realty, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Maryland to employ The Burns Law Firm, LLC, as
counsel to the Debtor.

Carroll Realty requires Burns Law Firm to:

   (a) provide the Debtor with legal advice concerning their
       powers and duties as Debtor-in-possession;

   (b) prepare applications, answers, orders, reports and other
       legal papers, to be filed by the Debtor;

   (c) file and prosecute adversary proceedings against necessary
       parties adverse to the Debtor or their estate;

   (d) prepare any disclosure statement or plan of
       reorganization; and

   (e) perform Chapter 11 services for the Debtor and the
       estate which may be necessary in the bankruptcy case.

Burns Law Firm will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners                $495
     Associates              $355
     Paralegals              $295

Burns Law Firm will be paid a retainer in the amount of $5,000.

Burns Law Firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

John D. Burns, partner of The Burns Law Firm, LLC, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Burns Law Firm can be reached at:

     John D. Burns, Esq.
     THE BURNS LAW FIRM, LLC
     6303 Ivy Lane, Suite 102
     Greenbelt, MD 20770
     Tel: (301) 441-8780

                      About Carroll Realty

Carroll Realty, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
D. Md. Case No. 19-16304) on May 9, 2019, estimating under $1
million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor hired The
Gardner Law Firm, P.C., and the Burns Law Firm, LLC, as bankruptcy
counsel.  Donna MP Wilson, LLC, is special counsel.



CBAK ENERGY: Incurs $2.33 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $2.33 million on $4.27 million of net revenues for the three
months ended June 30, 2019, compared to a net loss of $3.44 million
on $6.05 million of net revenues for the three months ended June
30, 2018.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company reported a net
loss of $5.14 million on $9.44 million of net revenues compared to
a net loss of $6.01 million on $9.36 million of net revenues for
the same period a year ago.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $118.34 million in total
assets, $112.16 million in total liabilities, and $6.17 million in
total equity.

                    Liquidity and Capital Resources

CBAK Energy has financed its liquidity requirements from short-term
bank loans, other short-term loans and bills payable under bank
credit agreements, advances from its related and unrelated parties,
investors and issuance of capital stock.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of
$0.3 million.  The Company's total current assets were $46.8
million and its total current liabilities were $88.7 million,
resulting in a net working capital deficiency of $41.9 million.
These factors raise substantial doubts about the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern.

CBAK Energy said, "We are currently expanding our product lines and
manufacturing capacity in our Dalian plant, which require more
funding to finance the expansion.  We may also require additional
cash due to changing business conditions or other future
developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may
decide to pursue.  We plan to renew these loans upon maturity, if
required, and plan to raise additional funds through bank
borrowings and equity financing in the future to meet our daily
cash demands, if required.  However, there can be no assurance that
we will be successful in obtaining this financing. If our existing
cash and bank borrowing are insufficient to meet our requirements,
we may seek to sell equity securities, debt securities or borrow
from lending institutions.  We can make no assurance that financing
will be available in the amounts we need or on terms acceptable to
us, if at all.  The sale of equity securities, including
convertible debt securities, would dilute the interests of our
current shareholders.  The incurrence of debt would divert cash for
working capital and capital expenditures to service debt
obligations and could result in operating and financial covenants
that restrict our operations and our ability to pay dividends to
our shareholders.  If we are unable to obtain additional equity or
debt financing as required, our business operations and prospects
may suffer.

"In the meanwhile, due to the growing environmental pollution
problem, the Chinese government is currently providing vigorous
support to the new energy facilities and vehicle.  It is expected
that we will be able to secure more potential orders from the new
energy market, especially from the electric car market.  We believe
with that the booming future market demand in high power lithium
ion products, we can continue as a going concern and return to
profitability."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/iHYeYi

                        About CBAK Energy

Dalian, China-based CBAK Energy Technology, Inc., formerly China
BAK Battery, Inc. -- http://www.cbak.com.cn/-- is engaged in the
business of developing, manufacturing and selling new energy high
power lithium batteries, which are mainly used in the following
applications: electric vehicles; light electric vehicles; and
electric tools, energy storage, uninterruptible power supply, and
other high power applications.

CBAK Energy reported a net loss of $1.95 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared with a net loss of $21.46 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of March 31, 2019, CBAK Energy had
$123.24 million in total assets, $120.28 million in total
liabilities, and $2.95 million in total equity.

Centurion ZD CPA & Co., in Hong Kong, China, the Company's auditor
since 2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated April 16, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the
Company has a working capital deficiency, accumulated deficit from
recurring net losses and significant short-term debt obligations
maturing in less than one year as of Dec. 31, 2018. All these
factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.


CITY RESTAURANT: Seeks to Hire Berger Fischoff as Attorney
----------------------------------------------------------
City Restaurant Supply, Inc. seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn) to
hire Berger, Fischoff, Shumer, Wexler & Goodman, LLP, as
attorneys.

City Restaurant requires Berger Fischoff to:

     a. provide legal advice with respect to the powers and duties
of the Debtor-in-Possession in the continued management of its
business and property;

     b. represent the Debtor before the Bankruptcy Court and at all
hearings on matters pertaining to its affairs, as
Debtor-in-Possession, including prosecuting and defending litigated
matters as they may arise during the Chapter 11 case;

     c. advise and assist the Debtor in the preparation and
negotiation of a Plan of Reorganization with its creditors;

     d. prepare all necessary or desirable applications, answers,
orders, reports, documents and other legal papers; and

     e. perform all other legal services for the Debtor which may
be desirable and necessary.

Berger Fischoff will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners              $425 to $575
     Associates            $315 to $400
     Paralegals               $185

Berger Fischoff will be paid a retainer in the amount of
$20,000.00, plus $1,717 filing fee.

Berger Fischoff will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Gary C. Fischoff, a partner at Berger Fischoff, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Berger Fischoff can be reached at:

     Gary C. Fischoff, Esq.
     BERGER FISCHOFF SHUMER
     WEXLER & GOODMAN, LLP
     6901 Jericho Turnpike, Suite 230
     Syosset, NY 11791
     Tel: (516) 747-1136
     E-mail: gfischoff@sfbblaw.com

              About City Restaurant Supply, Inc.

Based in Brooklyn, New York, City Restaurant Supply, Inc. filed a
voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-42762) on May 3, 2019, listing under $1
million in both assets and liabilities. Gary C Fischoff at Berger,
Fischoff, Shumer, Wexler & Goodman, LLP represents the Debtor as
counsel.


CITYWIDE COMMUNITY: Seeks Release of Garnished Fund to Pay Wages
----------------------------------------------------------------
Citywide Community Counseling Services, Inc., asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to
release funds garnished by T&D Bank, N.A., in order to continue
operations and specifically to pay pre-petition wages.

T&D Bank, with which the Debtor maintains an account, was served a
Writ of Execution relating to a judgment for damages against the
Debtor. The garnished account amounts to $65,911.97.  The Debtor
estimates unpaid employee wages at $137,959.  In the ordinary
course, the Debtor issues payroll checks every two weeks of
approximately $137,959.  A copy of the budget reflecting salary
figures (in bold), can be accessed for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/Citywide_C_Cash_Budget.pdf

The Debtor intends to provide adequate protection to TD Bank and
the Internal Revenue Service through replacement liens and monthly
payments.  The IRS has liens amounting to $165,341 on the Debtor's
assets.  The Debtor asks for expedited consideration of its request
in order, among others, to maintain the morale of its employees.  

A copy of the Motion is available free of charge at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/Citywide_C_Cash_M.pdf

               About Citywide Community Counseling

Citywide Community Counseling Services, Inc., is a 501 c(3)
non-profit corporation that offers psychiatric, psychological, and
behavioral services.  The Company has a multicultural &
multilingual behavioral health program designed to provide
outpatient services, within a full range of modalities.

The Debtor sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No.
19-15164) in Philadelphia on Aug. 16, 2019.  In the petition signed
by Dr. Modesta Molina, COO, the Debtor estimated assets between
$100,000 and $500,000, and liabilities between $1 million and $10
million.  Judge Magdeline D. Coleman oversees the case.  CIARDI
CIARDI & ASTIN, P.C., serves as counsel to the Debtor.


CITYWIDE COMMUNITY: Seeks to Hire Ciardi Ciardi as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Citywide Community Counseling Services, Inc. seeks authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(Philadelphia) to hire Ciardi Ciardi & Astin, P.C., as counsel to
the Debtor.

Citywide required Ciardi Ciardi to:

     (a) give the Debtor legal advice with respect to its powers
and duties as a Debtor-in-possession;

     (b) prepare on behalf of the Debtor any necessary
applications, motions, answers, orders, reports, and other legal
papers; and

     (c) perform all other legal services for the Debtor as may be
necessary.

Ciardi Ciardi will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Albert A. Ciardi, III           $515
     Nicole M. Nigrelli              $475
     Daniel S. Siedman               $300
     Dorene Torres, Paralegal        $120

Albert A. Ciardi, III, a partner at the firm, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Ciardi Ciardi can be reached at:

     Albert A. Ciardi, III, Esq.
     CIARDI CIARDI & ASTIN, P.C.
     2005 Market Street, Suite 3500
     Philadelphia, PA 19103
     Tel: (215) 557-3550
     Fax: (215) 557-3551
     E-mail: aciardi@ciardilaw.com

               About Citywide Community Counseling Services

Based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Citywide Community Counseling
Services, Inc. filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 19-15164) on
August 16, 2019. Albert A. Ciardi, III at Ciardi Ciardi & Astin,
P.C represents the Debtor as counsel.


COASTAL HOME: Seeks to Hire Blanchard Law as Attorney
-----------------------------------------------------
Coastal Home Care, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Florida to employ Blanchard Law,
P.A., as attorney to the Debtor.

Coastal Home requires Blanchard Law to:

   a. give the Debtor legal advice with respect to its powers and
      duties as Debtor and as debtor-in-possession in the
      continued operation of its business and management of its
      property;

   b. prepare necessary applications, answers, orders, reports,
      complaints, and other legal papers and appear at hearings
      thereon; and

   c. perform all other legal services for the Debtor as Debtor-
      in-Possession which may be necessary herein, and it is
      necessary for the Debtor as debtor-in-possession to employ
      this attorney for such professional services.

Blanchard Law will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                $300
     Associates               $275
     Paralegals               $90

Blanchard Law will be paid a retainer in the amount of $10,000,
exclusive of filing fee.

Blanchard Law will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Jake C. Blanchard, Esq., partner of Blanchard Law, P.A., assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Blanchard Law can be reached at:

         Jake C. Blanchard, Esq.
         BLANCHARD LAW, P.A.
         1501 Belcher Road South, Unit 2B
         Largo, FL 33771
         Tel: (727) 531-7068
         Fax: (727) 535-2086
         E-mail: jake@jakeblanchardlaw.com

                    About Coastal Home Care

Coastal Home Care, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-07259) on July 31, 2019, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is
represented by Jake C. Blanchard, Esq., at Blanchard Law, P.A.


COLORADO GROUP 3: Files Second Amended Cash Collateral Request
--------------------------------------------------------------
Colorado Group 3 LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Colorado, in a second amended motion, to use cash
collateral to pay necessary operating expenses.
  
Michael Davis, Esq., counsel to the Debtor at DLG Law Group LLC,
says the Debtor does not have, nor does generate accounts
receivable.  As of the Petition Date, the Debtor’s cash on hand
and in bank accounts is approximately $0.  The Debtor uses the
rents in excess of $6,300 it generates monthly to pay its bills.
No accounts receivable, however, has been generated since the
receiver was appointed.

The Debtor proposes a budget variance of up to 15% per line item,
per month, plus all fees payable to the U.S. Trustee.  As adequate
protection for cash collateral use, the Debtor proposes:

   * to provide replacement lien on all post-petition accounts and
cash equivalents to the extent of decrease in the cash value owing
to the Debtor’s use of the cash;

   * to maintain adequate insurance coverage on all personal
property assets and to keep the collateral in good condition, and

   * to pay all postpetition taxes.

The budget provides for total monthly expenses of $2,522, of which
$800 is for properties maintenance.  A copy of the budget can be
accessed for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Colorado_G_3_Cash_Budget.pdf

The Debtor asks the Court for an emergency hearing on the request.


                    About Colorado Group 3

Colorado Group 3 LLC operates short term and long term rental on
its property at 124 River Bend Way, Glenwood Springs, Colorado.

Colorado Group 3 LLC sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Colo.
Case No. 19-116388) on July 26, 2019, estimating less than $50,000
in assets and liabilities.  

The bankruptcy filing was prompted due to the Debtor's inability to
pay off their loan with Lead Funding II LLC and the subsequent
appointment of a receiver for their property on July 12, 2019 in
the state court cases filed for that purpose.  The Debtor plans on
asking the Court to require the receiver to turnover the property
to continue operation.  The rental income is the only source of
income for the Debtor that allows it to make loan payments and pay
its creditors.

Michael J. Davis, Esq., of DLG LAW GROUP LLC, represents the
Debtor.


COLORADO GROUP: Presents Second Amended Cash Collateral Motion
--------------------------------------------------------------
Colorado Group LLC 1, in its second amended request, asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado to use cash
collateral to pay necessary operating expenses based on a budget,
plus up to 15 percent variance per line item monthly.  The Debtor
also proposes to pay all U.S. Trustee fees.  The Debtor asserts
that without access to cash collateral, it will not be able to pay
operating expenses and costs related to its business operations.

Pre-petition, the Debtor owes Lead Funding ll LLC approximately
$1,025,000, plus interest and late fees.  Lead Funding may have a
secured lien position on the Debtor’s revenues that constitute
cash collateral.  The Debtor, however, generates in excess of
$15,000 in rents, and therefore is replacing its cash in the
ordinary course of business.  Accordingly, the secured interest of
any of its secured creditors is adequately protected, the Debtor
relates.

A copy of the Second Amended Motion and the Budget can be accessed
free of charge at:
               http://bankrupt.com/misc/Colorado_G_Cash_2nd_M.pdf
               http://bankrupt.com/misc/Colorado_G_Cash_Budget.pdf

The Debtor seeks an expedited hearing on the motion.

                     About Colorado Group

Colorado Group LLC 1 is into the business of acquiring short term
and long terms renters for its property located at 66 Davis Court,
Breckenridge, Colorado.  

The Company sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No.
19-16386) on July 26, 2019.  As of the filing of this case, the
Debtor's assets are valued at up to $50,000 and its liabilities are
within the same range.  

The bankruptcy filing was prompted due to the Debtor's inability to
pay off their loan with Lead Funding II LLC and the subsequent
appointment of a receiver for their property on July 12, 2019 in
the state court cases filed for that purpose.  The Debtor plans on
asking the Court to require the receiver to turnover the property
to continue operation.  The rental income is the only source of
income for the Debtor that allows it to make loan payments and pay
its creditors.

Michael J. Davis, Esq., of DLG LAW GROUP LLC, is the Debtor's
counsel.


COSMOS HOLDINGS: Incurs $1.54 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------------
Cosmos Holdings Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $1.54 million on $8.51 million of revenue for the three months
ended June 30, 2019, compared to net income of $782,389 on $8.85
million of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2018.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company reported a net
loss of $1.76 million on $18.19 million of revenue compared to a
net loss of $2.27 million on $20.82 million of revenue for the same
period last year.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had an accumulated deficit of
$18,029,851 and a working capital deficit of $5,506,208.  The
Company's management believes that these conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern for a period of twelve months from the date of this
filing.

Cosmos Holdings said, "The Company has not yet established an
adequate ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its
operating costs and to allow it to continue as a going concern. The
ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent
on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses
until it becomes profitable.  If the Company is unable to obtain
adequate capital, it could be forced to cease development of
operations."

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $21.83 million in total
assets, $26.61 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $4.78 million.

At June 30, 2019, the Company had cash of $886,667 versus $864,343
as of Dec. 31, 2018.  For the six months ended June 30, 2019, net
cash used in operating activities was $2,791,266 versus $1,322,570
net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June
30, 2018.  The Company has devoted substantially all of its cash
resources to expand through organic business growth and, where
appropriate, through the execution of selective company and license
acquisitions, and has incurred significant general and
administrative expenses in order to enable the financing and growth
of its business and operations.

During the six months ended June 30, 2019, there was $542,423 net
cash provided by investing activities versus $21,761 net cash used
in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2018.
This was primarily due to the increased purchase of fixed assets by
Cosmofarm, offset by sales of investment shares.

During the six months ended June 30, 2019, there was $2,280,513 of
net cash provided by financing activities versus $1,859,924
provided by financing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2018.

"We anticipate using cash in our bank account as of June 30, 2019,
cash generated from the operations of the Company and its operating
subsidiary and from debt or equity financing, or from a loan from
management, to the extent that funds are available to do so to
conduct our business in the upcoming year," Cosmos Holdings stated.
"Management is not obligated to provide these or any other funds.
If we fail to meet these requirements, we may lose the
qualification for quotation and our securities would no longer
trade on the over the counter markets.  Further, as a consequence
we would fail to satisfy our reporting obligations with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), and investors would
then own stock in a company that does not provide the disclosure
available in quarterly and annual reports filed with the SEC and
investors may have increased difficulty in selling their stock as
we will be non-reporting."

As of Aug. 19, 2019, since June 30, 2019, the Company has borrowed
additional net proceeds of $1,250,000 from the unaffiliated
third-party lender who had previously loaned the Company $750,000
via two senior promissory notes, the first in the principal amount
of $750,000 executed on July 24, 2019, and the latter in the
principal amount of $500,000 executed on Aug. 1, 2019.  The senior
promissory notes mature on July 24 and Aug. 1, 2020, respectively.
Interest is set at 15% per annum, paid quarterly in arrears.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/ywL4gJ

                    About Cosmos Holdings

Cosmos Holdings Inc. is a multinational pharmaceutical wholesaler.
The Company imports, exports and distributes pharmaceutical
products of brand-name and generic pharmaceuticals,
over-the-counter medicines, a variety of dietary and vitamin
supplements.  Currently, the Company distributes products mainly in
the EU countries via its two wholly owned subsidiaries Skypharm SA
and Decahedron Ltd.

Cosmos Holdings reported a net loss of $9.06 million in 2018
following a net loss of $6.21 million in 2017.  As of March 31,
2019, the Company had $21.7 million in total assets, $25.25 million
in total liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $3.54
million.

Armanino LLP, in San Francisco, California, the Company's auditor
since 2019, issued a "going concern" opinion in its report dated
April 16, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital
deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.



DELPHI CORP: DAS Wins Summary Judgment Bid vs Kevin Spencer
-----------------------------------------------------------
Defendant Delphi Automotive Systems LLC in the case captioned KEVIN
SPENCER, Plaintiff, v. HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.; HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR
COMPANY, INC.; DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, LLC; DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE,
PLC; DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE, LLP; BWI NORTH AMERICA, INC.; and ENTITIES
I-X, Defendants, Case No. 2:16-cv-00427-DN (D. Utah) has filed a
motion for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) against
Plaintiff Kevin Spencer. Because there is no genuine dispute as to
any material fact and DAS LLC is entitled to judgment as a matter
of law, District Judge David Nuffer granted the motion.

On or about April 22, 2016, Plaintiff Kevin Spencer commenced the
action against Defendants Harley-Davidson Inc. and Harley-Davidson
Motor Company Inc. in the Third Judicial District Court of the
State of Utah. Harley-Davidson timely removed the action to federal
court on diversity grounds. On April 26, 2017, Spencer filed an
amended complaint naming four additional defendants: Delphi
Automotive Systems LLC ("DAS LLC"), Delphi Automotive LLP ("DA
LLP"), Delphi Automotive PLC ("DA PLC"), and BWI North America Inc.
("BWI").

The amended complaint asserts five claims for relief against all
defendants: (1) strict products liability, (2) negligence, (3)
breach of express warranties, (4) breach of the implied warranty of
merchantability, and (5) breach of the implied warranty of fitness
for a particular purpose. Each of these claims "arises out of a
single-vehicle accident that occurred on May 13, 2014[,] when the
anti-lock brake system ('ABS') failed . . . on a 2011
Harley-Davidson" motorcycle, which injured Spencer.

Presently, Spencer's claims against Harley-Davidson have been
dismissed with prejudice. His claims against DA LLP and DA PLC have
been dismissed without prejudice. Only his claims against DAS LLC
and BWI remain. His claims against DAS LLC, which are the subject
of this Motion, are based on the premise that DAS LLC was "involved
in the manufacture of certain components of the ABS" module on
Spencer's motorcycle  and "worked . . . with Harley-Davidson in
designing, manufacturing, programming, [testing,] distributing, and
marketing said components."

The Court holds that there is no evidence that DAS LLC has any
contacts with Utah, performed any activity in Utah, or purposefully
directed any activity at residents of Utah. Although Spencer has
argued that "there is a good-faith basis to believe [DAS LLC] may
have conducted business within Utah" in 2009, there is no evidence
to establish this belief as a fact. But even if there were, there
is still no evidence that Spencer's injuries arise out of DAS LLC's
forum-related activities. Indeed, it is undisputed that DAS LLC had
no role in the design, testing, inspection, manufacture, marketing,
distribution, or sale of Spencer's Module -- let alone in Utah. And
there is likewise no evidence to establish that DAS LLC made a
warranty, express or implied, to anyone regarding Spencer's Module
-- let alone in Utah.

Accordingly, specific jurisdiction over DAS LLC does not exist in
Utah, and Spencer's claims against DAS LLC must be dismissed for
lack of jurisdiction.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision and Order dated March 27,
2019 is available at https://bit.ly/2Zhc1sj from Leagle.com.

Kevin Spencer, an individual, Plaintiff, represented by Jeffrey D.
Eisenberg, EISENBERG CUTT KENDELL & OLSON & Christopher P. Higley,
EISENBERG CUTT KENDELL & OLSON.

Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC, Defendant, represented by Nathan D.
Alder , CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN PC & Sarah E. Spencer , CHRISTENSEN &
JENSEN PC.

BWI North American, Defendant, represented by Blaine J. Benard,
HOLLAND & HART, J. Derek Kearl, HOLLAND & HART & Amy M. Johnston,
MILLER CANFIELD PADDOCK & STONE PLC, pro hac vice.

Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC, Cross Claimant, represented by
Nathan D. Alder , CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN PC & Sarah E. Spencer ,
CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN PC.

BWI North American, Cross Defendant, represented by Blaine J.
Benard, HOLLAND & HART, J. Derek Kearl, HOLLAND & HART & Amy M.
Johnston, MILLER CANFIELD PADDOCK & STONE PLC.

Harley Davidson Inc, a corporation & Harley Davidson Motor Company,
a corporation, Cross Defendants, represented by Anthony P.
Steinike, QUARLES & BRADY LLP & Katherine E. Venti, PARSONS BEHLE &
LATIMER.

BWI North American, Cross Claimant, represented by Blaine J.
Benard, HOLLAND & HART, J. Derek Kearl, HOLLAND & HART & Amy M.
Johnston, MILLER CANFIELD PADDOCK & STONE PLC.

Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC, Cross Defendant, represented by
Nathan D. Alder , CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN PC & Sarah E. Spencer ,
CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN PC.

                       About Delphi Corp.

Based in Troy, Michigan, Delphi Corporation --
http://www.delphi.com/-- is a global supplier of electronics and
technologies for automotive, commercial vehicle and other market
segments.  Delphi operates major technical centers, manufacturing
sites and customer support facilities in 30 countries.

The Company filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead
Case No. 05-44481) on Oct. 8, 2005.  John Wm. Butler Jr., Esq.,
John K. Lyons, Esq., and Ron E. Meisler, Esq., at Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, represented the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts.  Robert J. Rosenberg, Esq., Mitchell A.
Seider, Esq., and Mark A. Broude, Esq., at Latham & Watkins LLP,
represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  As of
June 30, 2008, the Debtors' balance sheet showed $9.16 billion in
assets and $23.7 billion in debt.

The Court confirmed Delphi's plan on Jan. 25, 2008.  The Plan was
not consummated after a group led by Appaloosa Management, L.P.,
backed out from their proposal to provide $2.55 billion in equity
financing to Delphi.  At the end of July 2009, Delphi obtained
confirmation of a revised plan, build upon a sale of the assets to
a entity formed by some of the lenders who provided $4 billion of
debtor-in-possession financing, and General Motors Company.

On Oct. 6, 2009, Delphi's Chapter 11 plan of reorganization became
effective.  A Master Disposition Agreement executed among Delphi
Corporation, Motors Liquidation Company, General Motors Company, GM
Components Holdings LLC, and DIP Holdco 3, LLC, divides Delphi's
business among three separate parties -- DPH Holdings LLC, GM
Components, and DIP Holdco 3.

Delphi emerged from Chapter 11 as DPH Holdings.  DPH Holdings is
responsible for the post-Effective Date administration and eventual
closing of the Chapter 11 cases as well as the disposition of
certain retained assets and payment of certain retained liabilities
as provided under the Modified Plan.

Delphi Automotive PLC is UK-based company formed in May 2011 as a
holding company for US-based automotive parts manufacturer Delphi
Automotive LLP.  Delphi Automotive LLP is the successor to the
former Delphi Corporation.  At the time of its formation, Delphi
Automotive PLC filed an initial public offering seeking to raise at
least $100 million.


DEMERARA HOLDINGS: Wants Cash Access to Maintain Mortgage Property
------------------------------------------------------------------
Demerara Holdings Incorporated asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of New York to use cash collateral generated
from the rental income of a real property known as 765 Utica
Avenue, Brooklyn, New York.  The 765 Utica Property is secured by a
first mortgage held by Ponce Bank and a second mortgage held by
Todd Baslin.

The Debtor owes Ponce Bank $621,069.72 and Todd Baslin $60,000, on
the mortgage.  Another property, known as 763 Utica Avenue,
Brooklyn, New York, also secures the mortgage.  The Debtor requires
monthly payment of $4,040 on the mortgage due to Ponce Bank, and
$300 on the mortgage due to Todd Baslin.  As of the Petition Date,
the Debtor is not current with the mortgage payments due to either
Ponce Bank or Todd Baslin, but intends to pay all post-petition
mortgage payments when due.  

The Debtor asks the Court to use cash collateral nunc pro tunc to
the Petition Date such that the rental income from the 765 Utica
Real Property be used first for monthly mortgage payments as they
come due and then for those other expenses of the 765 Utica Real
Property.  

Mark E. Cohen, Esq., counsel to the Debtor says both Ponce Bank and
Todd Baslin are adequately protected with the rent roll at the real
property exceeding the amount of the post-petition monthly mortgage
payments each month.  The Debtor proposes to provide Ponce Bank a
replacement lien on the Debtor’s assets to the extent of any
erosion of the mortgagee’s cash collateral as a result of using
the rents.  The value of 765 Utica Real Property is estimated to be
$600,000 although no appraisal has yet been done.

The Debtor discloses that it intends to modify or work on a
renegotiation of the debt.  A copy of the Motion is available for
free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/Demerara_Cash_M.pdf

                   About Demerara Holdings

Demerara Holdings Incorporated owns and operates commercial rental
and residential rental units in Brooklyn, New York.  Demerara
Holdings sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No.
19-44681) on July 31, 2019.  In the petition signed by Marcanthony
W. Atwell, president, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities
between $500,000 to $1 million.  Mark E. Cohen, Esq., is the
Debtor's counsel.

Counsel to Ponce Bank can be reached through:

         David K. Fiveson, Esq.
         Butler, Fitzgerald, Fiveson & McCarthy, P.C.
         Nine East 45th Street, Ninth Floor
         New York, New York 10017

              -- and --

         Edward S. Feldman, Esq.
         Feldman & Associates, PLLC
         570 Grand Avenue
         Englewood, New Jersey 07631



DK ENTERPRISES: Seeks to Hire Lamberth Cifelli as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
DK Enterprises of GA, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates, seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District
of Georgia to employ Lamberth Cifelli Ellis & Nason, P.A., as
counsel to the Debtor.

DK Enterprises requires Lamberth Cifelli to:

   (a) advise, assist, and represent the Debtors with respect to
       the Debtors's rights, powers, duties, and obligations in
       the administration of this case, and the collection,
       preservation, and administration of assets of the
       Debtors's estate;

   (b) advise, assist, and represent the Debtors with regard to
       any claims and causes of action which the estate may have
       against various parties including, without limitation,
       claims for preferences, fraudulent conveyances, improper
       disposal of assets, and other claims or rights to recovery
       granted to the estate; to institute appropriate adversary
       proceedings or other litigation and to represent the
       Debtors therein with regard to such claims and causes of
       action; and to advise and represent the Debtors with
       regard to the review and analysis of any legal issues
       incident to any of the foregoing;

   (c) advise, assist, and represent the Debtors with regard to
       investigation of the desirability and feasibility of the
       rejection or assumption and potential assignment of any
       executory contracts or unexpired leases, and to advise,
       assist, and represent the Debtors with regard to liens and
       encumbrances asserted against property of the estate and
       potential avoidance actions for the benefit of the estate,
       within the Debtors S&P's rights and powers under the
       Bankruptcy Code, and the initiation and prosecution of
       appropriate proceedings in connection therewith;

   (d) advise, assist, and represent the Debtors in connection
       with all applications, motions, or complaints concerning
       reclamation, sequestration, relief from stays, disposition
       or other use of assets of the estate, and all other
       similar matters;

   (e) advise, assist, and represent the Debtors with regard to
       the preparation, drafting, and negotiation of a plan of
       liquidation and accompanying disclosure statement, or
       negotiation with other parties presenting a plan of
       liquidation and accompanying disclosure statement; the
       preparation, filing, and service as required of
       appropriate motions, notices, and other pleadings as may
       be necessary to comply with the Bankruptcy Code with
       regard to all of the foregoing;

   (f) prepare pleadings, applications, motions, reports, and
       other papers incidental to administration, and to conduct
       examinations as may be necessary pursuant to Bankruptcy
       Rule 2004 or as otherwise permitted under applicable law;

   (g) provide support and assistance to the Debtors with regard
       to the proper receipt, disbursement, and accounting for
       funds and property of the estate;

   (h) provide support and assistance to the Debtors with regard
       to the review of claims against the Debtors, the
       investigation of amounts properly allowable and the
       appropriate priority or classification of same, and the
       filing and prosecution of objections to claims as
       appropriate; and

   (i) perform any and all other legal services incident or
       necessary to the proper administration of this case and
       the representation of the Debtors in the performance of
       its duties and exercise of its rights and powers under the
       Bankruptcy Code.

Lamberth Cifelli will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys               $200-$495
     Paralegals              $110-$215

Lamberth Cifelli will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

G. Frank Nason, IV, partner of Lamberth Cifelli Ellis & Nason,
P.A., assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person"
as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code
and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and
their estates.

Lamberth Cifelli can be reached at:

     G. Frank Nason, IV, Esq.
     LAMBERTH CIFELLI ELLIS & NASON, P.A.
     1117 Perimeter Center West, Suite N313
     Atlanta, GA 30338
     Tel: (404) 262-7373

              About DK Enterprises of GA, Inc.

DK Enterprises is the holder of all of the membership interests in
four separate single purpose limited liability companies that
operate as Atlanta Bread Company franchisees, including DK 141 and
DK Roswell. DK 141 operates an Atlanta Bread Company franchise
located in The Collections at Forsyth, 141 Peachtree Parkway, Suite
116, Cumming, GA.  DK Roswell operates an Atlanta Bread Company
franchise located at Stonebridge Square Shopping Center, 640 West
Crossville Road, Suite 100, Roswell, GA. The other two locations
were operated by DK Enterprises of Cumming, LLC, which operated an
Atlanta Bread Company franchise located at the Cumming Marketplace,
908 Buford Road, Cumming, GA, and DK Enterprises of Dunwoody, LLC,
which operated an Atlanta Bread Company franchise located at
Perimeter Pointe, 1155 Mount Vernon Highway, Suite 1200, Atlanta,
GA 30338. DK Cumming and DK Dunwoody have ceased operating and
filed petitions under Chapter 7.

DK Enterprises of GA, Inc., based in Cumming, GA, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Lead Case No. 19-21389) on July 17,
2019. The Hon. James R. Sacca presides over the case. G. Frank
Nason, IV, Esq., at Lamberth Cifelli Ellis & Nason, P.A., serves as
bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, DK Enterprises of GA's estimated $50,000 to
$100,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.
The petition was signed by Dean Ditmar, president.



DR. RICHARD R. ROLLE: Maxillofacial Surgery Center Seeks Cash Use
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Richard R. Rolle, Jr., LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of North Carolina for permission to use cash
collateral on an interim basis in the ordinary course of the
business.  The Debtor proposes a 10 percent variance per line item
(on a cumulative basis).

Before the Petition Date, the Debtor contracted a debt with First
National Bank, N.A.  As of the Petition Date, the Debtor owes First
National $1,013,134.98.  The Debtor believes that First National is
a senior secured creditor.  Iredell Oral & Facial Surgery, P.C.,
holds a potential claim of $40,000 against the Debtor as of the
Petition Date.  The Debtor believes that Iredell is a junior lien
holder.  The Debtor’s counsel says there is a need to review
related loan documents to verify the extent of the creditors’
claims on the Debtor’s assets.

The Debtor asserts that immediate access to cash collateral is
vital to its going concern value and to its plan to reorganize.

                    About Richard R. Rolle

Dr. Richard R. Rolle Jr., PLLC --
http://rolleoralfacialsurgery.com/-- owns and operates a surgery
center in Cornelius, North Carolina, specializing in oral and
maxillofacial surgery and general dentistry.  

Dr. Richard R. Rolle Jr., PLLC, filed for Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. W.D.N.C. Case No. Case No. 19-31124) on Aug. 15, 2019 in
Charlotte, North Carolina.  In the petition signed by Richard R.
Rolle, Jr., member manager, the Debtor estimated assets at $100,000
to $500,000 and liabilities at $1 million to $10 million as of the
Petition Date.  Judge Craig J. Whitley oversees the case.  ESSEX
RICHARDS, P.A., is the Debtor's attorney.  




DREW MARINE: S&P Withdraws 'B' Issuer Credit Rating
---------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew all of its ratings on Drew Marine Group
Cooperatie U.A., including its 'B' issuer credit rating, at the
company's request.

"We withdrew our 'B' issuer credit rating on Drew Marine Group
Cooperatie U.A., as well as our 'B+' issue-level rating and '2'
recovery rating on the company's first-lien debt and 'CCC+'
issue-level rating and '6' recovery rating on its second-lien debt,
at the company's request. At the time of withdrawal, our outlook on
Drew Marine Group Cooperatie U.A. was stable," S&P said.



EAGLE CORP: Seeks to Hire Keen-Summit as Real Estate Advisor
------------------------------------------------------------
Eagle Corp. LLC seeks authority from the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York to hire (Manhattan)
Keen-Summit Capital Partners LLC as its real estate advisor
effective Aug. 15.

The services Keen will render are:

     (a) review pertinent documents and consult with the Debtor's
counsel, as appropriate;

     (b) coordinate with the Debtor the development of due
diligence materials;

     (c) develop, subject to the Debtor's review and approval, a
marketing plan and implement each facet of the marketing plan;

     (d) communicate regularly with prospects and solicit
transaction offers;

     (e) assist the Debtor in evaluating, structuring, negotiating,
and implementing the terms and conditions of a proposed
transaction, including but not limited to assisting with the
conduct of an auction, if any;

     (f) communicate regularly with the Debtor and its professional
advisors in connection with the status of its efforts; and

     (g) work with the Debtor's attorneys responsible for the
implementation of the proposed Transactions, reviewing documents,
negotiating and assisting in resolving problems which may arise.

Keen will be paid as follows:

     i. Reimbursement of up to $20,000 for marketing related
expenses; plus

    ii. $30,000 fee on the first $1,000,000 of sale proceeds; plus

   iii. 17.5% fee on all sale proceeds between $1,000,001 and
$2,000,000; or

    iv. If the sale proceeds exceed $2,000,000, then the total fees
payable to Keen-Summit shall be capped at 10% of the sale proceeds,
plus marketing expenses (i.e., sale proceeds of $2,500,000 would
entitle Keen-Summit to fees of $250,000, plus reimbursement of
expenses of up to $20,000).

Matthew Bordwin, managing director of Keen-Summit, disclosed in
court filings that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Matthew Bordwin
     Keen-Summit Capital Partners LLC
     1 Huntington Quadrangle, Suite 2C04
     Melville, NY 11747
     Telephone: (646) 381-9202
     Email: mbordwin@Keen-Summit.com

                About Eagle Corp. LLC

Eagle Corp. LLC owns and operates a food hall known as Hill Country
Food Park. The Food Park has different stalls, including a coffee
stand serving doughnuts and ice cream; a Tex-Mex taco stand; a
salad and sandwich shop; and a pizza stall.

Eagle Corp. LLC filed a voluntary case under chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-12565) on August 8,
2019. In the petition signed by Marc Glosserman, CEO and managing
member, the Debtor estimated $1,647,463 in assets and $3,326,864 in
liabilities. Brett S. Moore, Esq. at PORZIO, BROMBERG & NEWMAN,
P.C. represents the Debtor as counsel.


ELANCO ANIMAL: S&P Places 'BB+' ICR on Watch Neg. on Bayer AG Deal
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all its ratings on Elanco Animal Health
Inc., including its 'BB+' issuer credit rating and 'BB+'
issue-level ratings on the unsecured debt, on CreditWatch with
negative implications.

S&P placed the ratings on Elanco on CreditWatch based on its
expectation for materially increased leverage as a result of the
acquisition of Bayer's animal health segment, which more than
offsets improvement to the combined entity's business. Adjusted
leverage was 3.6x as of June 30, 2019, and the rating agency had
expected it to reduce to 3x by the end of 2020. S&P expects the
transaction to close in mid-2020 with pro forma leverage in the
mid-5x area, assuming no impact from divestitures, which the U.S.
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) might require Elanco to make to
complete the contemplated transaction.

Given Elanco's continued margin expansion efforts (bolstered by the
higher margins of Bayer's portfolio) and the cash flow generation
of the combined entity, S&P expects leverage to reduce to around
4.4x by the end of 2021. S&P expects that projected synergies of
$275 million-$300 million will be fully achievable over the medium
term, which should help the company deleverage following the
transaction. The rating agency also expects Elanco to limit
business development activity and shareholder repurchases and
dividends until leverage approaches 3x.

S&P believes that the business will improve as a result of the
combination, which forms the second-largest animal health company
in the world behind Zoetis Inc. (BBB/Stable). Product mix would
improve, as Bayer's animal health portfolio has a heavier
concentration in companion animal (CA) products, a faster-growing
and higher-margin segment than food animal products. The
combination increases Elanco's percentage of revenues from CA
products to 46% from 37% during 2018. This should reduce volatility
in operating results, as Elanco will be less susceptible to animal
health epidemics such as African swine fever, which slowed
year-to-date performance. The combination also improves geographic
diversity, with greater access to emerging markets including an
immediate foothold in China.

"Despite these improvements, we believe Elanco's pro forma business
remains materially weaker than that of Zoetis, which is larger and
much more profitable. We also believe there are integration risks
related to a transaction of this size, particularly since Elanco
has operated less than a year as a stand-alone entity," S&P said.

"We expect to resolve the CreditWatch on Elanco when the
transaction closes around mid-year 2020. Based on the proposed
financing plan and assuming no divestitures, which would likely
reduce leverage, we expect to lower the issuer credit rating to
'BB' from 'BB+' and assign a stable outlook," the rating agency
said.


ENRAMADA PROPERTIES: Case Summary & 7 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Enramada Properties, LLC
        8417 Enramada Ave
        Whittier, CA 90605

Business Description: Enramada Properties, LLC has a joint tenancy

                      interest in a property located in Los
                      Angeles, California valued at $325,000.
                      The Company also owns in fee simple two
                      real properties in Whittier, California
                      having an aggregate current value of $1.1
                      million.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 22, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Case No.: 19-19869

Judge: Hon. Julia W. Brand

Debtor's Counsel: Andrew S. Bisom, Esq.
                  THE BISOM LAW GROUP
                  300 Spectrum Center Drive, Ste. 1575
                  Irvine, CA 92618
                  Tel: 714-643-8900
                  Fax: 714-643-8901
                  E-mail: abisom@bisomlaw.com

Total Assets: $1,429,000

Total Liabilities: $1,724,414

The petition was signed by Sylvia Novoa, managing member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's seven unsecured creditors is available for
free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb19-19869.pdf


ENTERCOM COMMUNICATIONS: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B+' issuer credit rating on
Entercom Communications Corp. and revised its outlook to stable
from negative because it believes Entercom will improve leverage
below 5x by year-end 2019.

The legacy CBS Radio stations have grown over the past three
quarters and outperformed Entercom's legacy stations in the second
quarter of 2019. These stations had historically underperformed due
to underinvestment by CBS Radio, but since the acquisition closed
in Nov. 2017, Entercom has made investments in the stations'
brands, content, and leadership to support growth.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that leverage will
improve to the mid-4x area over the next 12 months due to a
combination of EBITDA growth, primarily driven by cost-saving
initiatives, and voluntary debt repayment.

"We could lower the rating if leverage remains above 5x over the
next year due to weak operating performance from increased
competition from alternative media or an economic downturn that
causes a pullback in advertising spending. Alternatively, we could
lower the rating if leverage remains above 5x over the next year
because cash flow is directed toward acquisitions or share
repurchases rather than debt repayment," S&P said.

"While unlikely over the next year, we could raise the rating if
the company improves leverage below 4x and establishes a track
record of keeping it there. An upgrade would also be contingent on
continuing positive operating and revenue trends," the rating
agency said.


FILTRATION SERVICES: Seeks to Use BofA Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------
Filtration Services Group LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Michigan for permission to use cash
collateral to pay necessary operating expenses, based on a budget
plus 10 percent variance of any line item.    

Before the Petition Date, the Debtor obtained a $1.49 million line
of credit from BofA.  BofA asserts a security interest in
substantially all of the Debtor's assets.  Well Fargo Bank, N.A.,
may also assert a security interest against certain equipment of
the Debtor.  The Debtor will provide the secured creditors
replacement liens with respect to the collateral that secured their
interest prepetition.   

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor held at least $125,000 of cash
and approximately $1,460,000 in receivables.  The Debtor expects to
disburse a total of $2,347,309 over a 13-week period from August
13, 2019 through November 13, 2019.  A copy of the budget presented
on a weekly  basis for the period from August 12 through November
4, 2019, and on a monthly basis for August, September and October
2019 can be accessed for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/Filtration_S_Cash_M.pdf   

The Debtor also seeks permission, in the ordinary course of the
business, to escrow $10,000 into a client trust account of its
counsel on a monthly basis to pay legal fees allowable by the
Court.      

The Debtor seeks an expedited hearing on the motion.  The request
is for an interim basis.

                About Filtration Services Group

Filtration Services Group LLC -- http://www.fsgfilters.com/--
provides filtration products for HVAC & air, dust collection,
compressed air, liquid, hydraulic, and rolled media.  The Company
was founded in 1972 with offices and warehouses in Waterford,
Michigan, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Nashville, Tennesee, and Kansas
City, Missouri.

The Debtor filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 19-51724) in Detroit, Michigan on
Aug. 13, 2019.  As of the Petition Date, the Debtor estimated
assets of not more than $50,000 and liabilities at $1 million to
$10 million.  Judge Marci B McIvor is assigned the Debtor's case.
KERR, RUSSELL AND WEBER, PLC, represents the Debtor.  The petition
was signed by Robert Jackson, manager and president.


FIVE J’S: Auto Parts Co and BOTW Stipulation Approved
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Mexico approved
the stipulation between Five J's Auto Parts Incorporated and Bank
of the West relating to the Debtor's use of cash collateral from
Aug. 16, 2019 through Nov. 30, 2019.

The stipulation provides that:

  (1) the Debtor may use cash collateral beginning August 16, 2019
through and including Jan. 31, 2020 for actual and necessary
postpetition and administrative expenses pursuant to the Budget in
amounts not to exceed 110 percent of the line item, except for the
parts line which the Debtor may exceed up to $50,000.

  (2) the Debtor will not pay any prepetition debt except as
expressly authorized by a Court order.

  (3) Bank of the West shall continue to have a security interest
in all assets in which Bank of the West had a lien or security
interest as of the Petition Date.  Bank of the West shall also be
granted replacement liens to the extent of any diminution in the
value its cash collateral.  Before the Petition Date, the Debtor
issued a promissory note to Bank of the West for a principal amount
of $100,000, plus interest.

  (4) The Ronald N. McCulloch and Kathleen E. McCulloch Revocable
Trust, as guarantor, will pay Bank of the West $3,800 on the Trust
Mortgage by the 15th of each successive month.  Before the Petition
Date, the Trust executed a promissory note to Bank of the West for
$438,000, plus interest.  The Trust Note is secured by a real
property mortgage.  

  (5) the Debtor will pay Bank of the West $1,024.97 on the Trust
Mortgage before Sept. 30, 2019.  The Debtor may opt to make this
one-time payment as an additional lease payment to the Trust, and
then paid by the Trust to Bank of the West.  This payment shall
cure any payment default on the Trust Mortgage.

  (6) the Debtor will pay $2,000 monthly to Bank of the West for
adequate protection, to be applied to the Note, with the first
payment due on the later of (a) August 15, 2019 or (b) five days
from the entry of the Court order.
   
A copy of the Stipulation Order can be accessed for free at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/Five_J_Cash_Stip.pdf

Located in Albuquerque, New Mexico, Five J's Auto Parts,
Incorporated -- https://fivejsauto.com/ -- is an automotive parts,
accessories, and tire supplier.

Five J's Auto Parts sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.M.
Case No. 19-11170) on May 17, 2019.  The Debtor estimated assets of
$500,000 to $1 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  Daniel Andrew White, Esq., at ASKEW & MAZEL, LLC, is the
Debtor's counsel.


FRIENDS OF CITRUS: Seeks to Hire GlassRatner as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------------
Friends of Citrus And The Nature Coast, Inc. seeks authority from
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of
Florida (Jacksonville) to hire GlassRatner Advisory & Capital
Group, LLC as its accountant.

The Debtor has agreed to pay GlassRatner its standard hourly fees
for its services, with a blended rate of $375 per hour.

Carol Fox, principal of GlassRatner, disclosed in court filings
that the firm is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Carol Fox
     GlassRatner Capital & Advisory Group, LLC
     1400 Centrepark Boulevard, Suite 860
     West Palm Beach, FL 33401
     Phone: (561) 932-0785
     Email: abarbee@glassratner.com

               About Friends of Citrus And The Nature Coast

Friends of Citrus And The Nature Coast --
https://friendsofcitrus.org/ -- is a charitable organization
providing community grief support workshop for anyone who has
experienced a loss; telephone support; grief support resources for
all ages; educational materials for parents and teachers; and
children's grief support camps.

Friends of Citrus And The Nature Coast, Inc. filed a voluntary
petition in this Court for relief under chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-03101) on August 14,
2019. In the petition signed by Bonnie L. Saylor, chief executive
officer, the Debtor estimated $7,510,918 in assets and $5,283,937
in liabilities.

Frank P. Terzo, Esq. at NELSON MULLINS BROAD AND CASSEL represents
the Debtor as counsel.


FRIENDS OF CITRUS: Seeks to Hire Nelson Mullins as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Friends of Citrus And The Nature Coast, Inc. seeks authority from
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of
Florida (Jacksonville) to hire Nelson Mullins Riley & Broad and
Cassel as counsel.

The Debtor requires Nelson Mullins to:

     a. advise the Debtor with respect to its rights, powers and
duties as a Debtor and debtor-in-possession in the continuing
management and operation of its business and properties under
chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, including legal and
administrative requirements;

     b. attend meetings and negotiate with representatives of
creditors, employees, and other parties in interest in this chapter
11 case;

     c. advise the Debtor in connection with any contemplated sales
of assets and implement bidding procedures, evaluate competing
offers, and counsel the Debtor in connection with the closing of
such sales;

     d. advise the Debtor in connection with any postpetition
financing and cash collateral arrangements and negotiate and draft
documents relating thereto;

     e. advise the Debtor on matters relating to the evaluation of
the assumption, rejection, assignment, restructuring or
recharacterization of unexpired leases and executory contracts;

     f. prepare motions, applications, answers, orders, responses,
objections, oppositions and other documents necessary or
appropriate in this case;

     g. advise the Debtor regarding negotiating and preparing on
the Debtor's behalf plan(s) of reorganization, plan(s) of
liquidation, disclosure statement(s) and all related agreements
and/or documents and taking any necessary action on behalf of the
Debtor to obtain confirmation of such plan(s);

     h. appear before this Court, other courts, and the U.S.
Trustee, and protect the interests of the Debtor's estate before
such courts and the U.S. Trustee;

     i. meet and coordinate with other counsel and other
professionals retained on behalf of the Debtor and approved by this
Court;

     j. perform all other necessary legal services and provide all
other necessary legal advice to the Debtor in connection with this
chapter 11 case;

     k. handle such other matters as requested by the Debtor from
time to time to which Nelson Mullins agrees.  

Nelson Mullins' hourly rates are:

     Frank P. Terzo      $625.00
     Partner
     Nicolette Vilmos    $450.00
     Partner
     Lisa Negron         $225.00
     Paralegal

Frank P. Terzo,  partner in the law firm of Nelson Mullins Broad
and Cassel, attests that Nelson Mullins is a "disinterested person"
as defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and as
required by section 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Frank P. Terzo, Esq.
     NELSON MULLINS BROAD AND CASSEL
     100 SE 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700
     Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
     Tel: 954-764-7060
     Email: frank.terzo@nelsonmullins.com

               About Friends of Citrus And The Nature Coast

Friends of Citrus And The Nature Coast --
https://friendsofcitrus.org/ -- is a charitable organization
providing community grief support workshop for anyone who has
experienced a loss; telephone support; grief support resources for
all ages; educational materials for parents and teachers; and
children's grief support camps.

Friends of Citrus And The Nature Coast, Inc. filed a voluntary
petition in this Court for relief under chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-03101) on August 14,
2019. In the petition signed by Bonnie L. Saylor, chief executive
officer, the Debtor estimated $7,510,918 in assets and $5,283,937
in liabilities.

Frank P. Terzo, Esq. at NELSON MULLINS BROAD AND CASSEL represents
the Debtor as counsel.


GB SCIENCES: Incurs $2.54 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------
GB Sciences, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $2.54 million on $910,676 of sales revenue for the three months
ended June 30, 2019, compared to a net loss of $5.35 million on
$1.31 million of sales revenue for the three months ended June 30,
2018.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $30.46 million in total
assets, $14.85 million in total liabilities, and $15.61 million in
total equity.

                        Current Liquidity

GB Sciences said, "The Company will need additional capital to
implement its strategies.  There is no assurance that it will be
able to raise the amount of capital needed for future growth plans.
Even if financing is available, it may not be on terms that are
acceptable.  If unable to raise the necessary capital at the times
required, the Company may have to materially change the business
plan, including delaying implementation of aspects of the business
plan or curtailing or abandoning the business plan. The Company
represents a speculative investment and investors may lose all of
their investment.  In order to be able to achieve the strategic
goals, the Company needs to further expand its business and
financing activities.  Based upon the cash position, it is
necessary to raise additional capital by the end of the next
quarter in order to continue to fund current operations.  These
factors raise substantial doubt about the ability to continue as a
going concern.  The Company is pursuing several alternatives to
address this situation, including the raising of additional funding
through equity or debt financings.  In order to finance existing
operations and pay current liabilities over the next twelve months,
the Company will need to raise additional capital. No assurance can
be given that the Company will be able to operate profitably on a
consistent basis, or at all, in the future.  The principal sources
of liquidity to date have been cash generated from sales of debt
and equity securities and loans."

At June 30, 2019, cash was $0.1 million, other current assets
excluding cash were $3.7 million, and the Company's working capital
deficit was $4.8 million.  At the same time, current liabilities
were approximately $8.6 million and consisted principally of $2.5
million in accounts payable, $0.6 million in accrued liabilities,
$4.8 million in notes payable, net of $1.0 million in discounts,
$0.2 million of current lease obligations, and $0.6 million in
income tax payable.  At March 31, 2019, the Company had a cash
balance of $0.2 million, other current assets excluding cash were
$3.2 million and the Company's working capital deficit was $3.2
million.  Current liabilities were approximately $6.7 million,
which consisted principally of and $3.1 million in accounts
payable, $0.6 million in accrued liabilities, $2.5 million in notes
payable, and $0.5 million in income taxes payable.

                       Sources and Uses of Cash

Net cash used in operating activities was $2.6 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to net cash used of
$3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.  The Company
anticipates that cash flows from operations may be insufficient to
fund business operations for the next twelve-month period.
Accordingly, the Company will have to generate additional liquidity
or cash flow to fund our current and anticipated operations.  This
will likely require the sale of additional common stock or other
securities.  There is no assurance that the Company will be able to
realize any significant proceeds from such sales, if at all.

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, the Company used $0.3
million of cash in investing activities compared to $2.5 million
during the three months ended June 30, 2018.  The cash used in
investing activities during the three months ended June 30, 2019
and 2018 was primarily for the purchase of property and equipment
and the acquisition of intangible assets.

During the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, cash flows
from financing activities totaled $2.8 million and $7.0 million,
respectively.  Cash flows from financing activities for the three
months ended June 30, 2019, related primarily to $2.3 million in
proceeds from the issuance of a convertible note and $0.7 million
in proceeds from the sale of common stock and warrant exercises,
offset by $0.2 million of principal payments on debt and finance
lease obligations.  Cash flows from financing activities for the
three months ended June 30, 2018 related primarily to $3.5 million
in proceeds from the sale of common stock and warrants in private
placements and $3.8 million in capital contributions from
non-controlling interests.

                           Going Concern

The Company has sustained net losses since inception, which have
caused an accumulated deficit of $87,232,454 at June 30, 2019.  The
Company had a working capital deficit of $4,772,333 at June 30,
2019, compared to $3,245,409 at March 31, 2019.  In addition, the
Company has consumed cash in its operating activities of $2,631,121
for the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to $3,495,871
for the same period last year.  These factors, among others, raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.

The Company said that management has been able, thus far, to
finance the losses through a public offering, private placements
and obtaining operating funds from stockholders.  The Company is
continuing to seek sources of financing.  There are no assurances
that the Company will be successful in securing capital necessary
to achieve its goals.

"In view of these conditions, the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional
financing or capital sources, to meet its financing requirements,
and ultimately to achieve profitable operations. Management
believes that its current and future plans provide an opportunity
to continue as a going concern," GB Sciences said.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                        https://is.gd/IYNLxU

                          About GB Sciences

Las Vegas, Nevada-based GB Sciences, Inc., formerly Growblox
Sciences, Inc., is developing and utilizing state of the art
technologies in plant biology, cultivation and extraction
techniques, combined with biotechnology, and plans to produce
consistent and measurable medical-grade cannabis, cannabis
concentrates and cannabinoid therapies.  The Company seeks to be an
innovative technology and solution company that converts the
cannabis plant into medicines, therapies and treatments for a
variety of ailments.

GB Sciences incurred net loss of $24.68 million for the 12 months
ended March 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $23.15 million for
the 12 months ended March 31, 2018.  As of March 31, 2019, GB
Sciences had $30.02 million in total assets, $12.86 million in
total liabilities, and $17.15 million in total equity.

Soles, Heyn & Company, LLP, in West Palm Beach, Florida, the
Company's auditor since the year ended March 31, 2014, issued a
"going concern" qualification in its report dated July 15, 2019, on
the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended
March 31, 2019, citing that the Company had accumulated losses of
approximately $84.7 million, has generated limited revenue, and may
experience losses in the near term.  These factors and the need for
additional financing in order for the Company to meet its business
plan, raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.


GENWORTH FINANCIAL: S&P Continues 'B' LT ICR on Watch Developing
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it continued its 'B' long-term issuer
credit rating on Genworth Financial Inc. (NYSE: GNW) and 'BB+'
long-term financial strength and issuer credit ratings on Genworth
Mortgage Insurance Corp. (GMICO; GNW's U.S. mortgage business) on
CreditWatch with developing implications, where they were placed
Sept. 26, 2018.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'B-' long-term financial
strength and issuer credit ratings on GNW's life and LTC
subsidiaries (Genworth Life Insurance Co., Genworth Life and
Annuity Insurance Co., and Genworth Life Insurance Co. of New
York). The outlook is stable.

S&P also affirmed its ratings on outstanding debt and hybrid
instruments issued by Genworth Holdings Inc., an intermediate
holding company.

The CreditWatch developing reflects the continued uncertainty
regarding regulatory approval for the acquisition of Genworth by
China Oceanwide, subsequent management actions if the transaction
is approved and completed, and S&P's belief that the stronger
mortgage entities will be more important to the group credit
profile with a lower impact from the life operations, considering
the group's effort to isolate those.

"While we believe there is potential for an upgrade, there are
considerable execution risks that we will need to monitor due to
the uncertainty related to the acquisition and efforts to isolate
the negative impact from GNW's life business. We could lower our
ratings on the group if the acquisition is not completed as
planned," S&P said, adding that the group ratings could also be
influenced by its view of potential for positive or negative
implications for GNW under new ownership.

Furthermore, given GMICO's stronger stand-alone credit profile, S&P
believes there could be upside potential if a greater degree of
separation from the rest of the group can be established, which
could limit the downside risk from existing pressures.

S&P's stable outlook on the life insurance subsidiaries reflects
its expectation that both the successful closing and termination of
the transaction with China Oceanwide will have neither a positive
nor a negative effect on its ratings on the life segment.

We could lower the ratings over the next 12 months if the specter
of supervisory intervention increases. We do not see any upside
potential for the ratings over the next 12 months," S&P said.
"Although unlikely, we could raise the ratings if the rate
improvement along with stabilizing reserve trends leads to a
sustainable positive earnings profile and better capitalization."

Genworth's group credit profile reflects a heavy debt load with
significant maturities over the next two years, weakness in its
life and LTC business, and consolidated capitalization that is
weaker than that of its peers, partially offset by GMICO's improved
credit profile, which the company indicates may pay a dividend this
year. The debt has largely been serviced by holding company cash
and by dividends (and other return of capital initiatives) from the
Australian and Canadian mortgage businesses, in which Genworth
holds majority ownership. Genworth originally counted on the China
Oceanwide deal to infuse capital to stabilize its balance sheet and
address upcoming debt maturities, but that plan is facing hurdles
from the longer-than-anticipated regulatory process. Genworth
recently announced plans to sell its majority stake in MIC to
bypass the Canadian regulatory review of the China Oceanwide
transaction. In S&P's view, the sale places Genworth in a good
position to pay off the 2020 maturities and provides it with a
longer runway in case the China Oceanwide deal is further delayed
(it has been extended for the 13th time, until December 2019) or is
terminated. The availability of resources over the next couple of
months, helped by the sale of the Canadian business, improves the
liquidity position, thereby supporting the holding company ratings.
However, if the China Oceanwide deal is terminated, considering the
unsustainable debt load and constrained access to the capital
markets, additional management actions will be needed to address
the significant maturities lined up until 2024 (and the
longer-dated maturities thereafter).


GJ SOUTH LLC: Seeks to Hire Guy Humphries as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
GJ South, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Colorado to employ Guy Humphries, Attorney At Law,
as counsel to the Debtor.

GJ South LLC requires Guy Humphries to:

   (a) analyze the Debtor's financial situation and render
       advice concerning a plan of reorganization;

   (b) provide legal advice concerning its powers and duties as a
       debtor in possession;

   (c) prepare and file of any petition, schedules, statement of
       affairs and any other required documents;

   (d) represent at the meeting of creditors and all hearings
       related to the bankruptcy case;

   (e) represent the Debtor in any adversary proceeding or
       contested matter arising from the bankruptcy case;

   (f) prepare all necessary reports, applications, answers,
       orders and all other required legal documents; and

   (g) perform all other legal services which may be necessary in
       the bankruptcy case.

Guy Humphries will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                  $350
     Paralegals                 $75

A pre-petition retainer of $11,000 was paid to the trust account of
Guy Humphries on July 30, 2019. Wells Fargo deducted a $15 wire
charge from the retainer paid to Guy Humphries. $1,717 from the
retainer was paid to the Bankruptcy Court Clerk for the Chapter 11
filing fee. $1,620 was paid to Guy Humphries for pre-petition
services. A balance of $7,648 is being held in the Firm's trust
account.

Guy Humphries will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Guy B. Humphries, partner of Guy Humphries, Attorney At Law,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Guy Humphries can be reached at:

     Guy B. Humphries, Esq.
     GUY HUMPHRIES, ATTORNEY AT LAW
     1801 Broadway Suite 1100
     Denver, CO 80202
     Tel: (303) 832-0029

                      About GJ South, LLC

GJ South LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D.
Colo. Case No. 19-16511) on July 30, 2019, disclosing under $1
million in both assets and liabilities. The Debtor is represented
by Guy B. Humphries, at Guy Humphries, Attorney At Law.



GLOBAL HEALTHCARE: Reports $176,000 Net Loss for Second Quarter
---------------------------------------------------------------
Global Healthcare REIT, Inc., filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting a
net loss attributable to common stockholders of $175,755 on $1.61
million of total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2019,
compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$492,331 on $902,146 of total revenue for the same period during
the prior year.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company reported a net
loss attributable to common stockholders of $18,959 on $2.88
million of total revenue compared to a net loss attributable to
common stockholders of $704,164 on $1.71 million of total revenue
for the same period last year.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $39.95 million in total
assets, $38.81 million in total liabilities, and $1.13 million in
total equity.

                 Liquidity and Capital Resources

Throughout its history, the Company has experienced shortages in
working capital and has relied, from time to time, upon sales of
debt and equity securities to meet cash demands generated by its
acquisition activities.

Global Healthcare said, "Our liquidity is expected to increase from
potential equity and debt offerings and decrease as net offering
proceeds are expended in connection with our various property
improvement projects.  Our continuing short-term liquidity
requirements consisting primarily of operating expenses and debt
service requirements, excluding balloon payments at maturity, are
expected to be achieved from rental revenues received and existing
cash on hand.  We plan to renew secured obligations that mature
during 2019, as our projected cash flow from operations will be
insufficient to retire the debt.  Our restricted cash approximated
$314,504 as of June 30, 2019 and is to be expended on insurance,
taxes, repairs, and capital expenditures associated with Providence
of Sparta Nursing Home."

Cash provided by operating activities was $400,839 for the six
months ended June 30, 2019 compared to cash provided by operating
activities of $273,599 for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Cash
flows from operations were impacted by the increase in prepaid
expenses and accounts receivable, and the increase in rental
revenues received and accounts payable during the first six months
of 2019.

Cash used in investing activities was $1,458,097 for the six-month
period ended June 30, 2019 compared to cash used in investing
activities of $627,432 for the six month period ended June 30,
2018.  The increase reflects increased spending on property
renovations and refurbishments.

Cash provided by financing activities was $1,378,919 for the six
months ended June 30, 2019 compared to cash provided by financing
activities of $217,156 for the six months ended June 30, 2018.
During the first six months of 2019, the Company received proceeds
from the issuance of debt of $1,676,354 and made payments on debt
of $273,550.  During the first six months of 2018, the Company
issued $493,534 in debt in cash and made cash payments on debt of
$261,378.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/CUxSZA

                   About Global Healthcare

Greenwood Village, Colorado-based Global Healthcare REIT, Inc.,
acquires, develops, leases, manages and disposes of healthcare real
estate, and provides financing to healthcare providers.  The
Company's portfolio will be comprised of investments in the
following five healthcare segments: (i) senior housing, (ii) life
science, (iii) medical office, (iv) post-acute/skilled nursing and
(v) hospital.

Global Healthcare reported a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $2.02 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018,
compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $3.02
million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of March 31, 2019,
Global Healthcare had $38.48 million in total assets, $37.30
million in total liabilities, and $1.18 million in total equity.

The audit opinion included in the Company's Annual Report for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, contains an explanatory paragraph
expressing substantial doubt regarding the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.  MaloneBailey, LLP, in Houston, Texas,
the Company's auditor since 2016, stated that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital
deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


GO DADDY: S&P Raises Issuer Credit Rating to 'BB'; Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on Go Daddy
Operating Co. LLC (GoDaddy) to 'BB' from 'BB-'. The outlook is
stable.

The upgrade reflects S&P's view that GoDaddy's sizable cash
balances, strong operating performance, and cash flow generation
will enable the company to assess future growth options. Leverage
adjusted for operating leases and unrestricted cash amounted to
about 2.5x as of June 30, 2019. S&P expects leverage to continue to
fall over the next year absent any large merger and acquisition
(M&A) or shareholder return activities.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation of consistent ARPU
growth of 6%-8% and net user adds, relatively stable EBITDA margin,
and free cash flow generation of about $500 million over the next
year. Absent any large acquisitions or shareholder activities, the
rating agency expects this will lead to lower leverage over the
next 12 months.

"We could lower the rating if the company deviates from its stated
financial policies whereby debt-financed acquisitions or
shareholder returns lead to leverage sustaining above 4x. We could
also lower the rating if weakening industry dynamics lead to lower
product demand and deterioration in Go-Daddy's operating
performance such that leverage rises above 4x," S&P said.

"Although unlikely over the coming year given the company's stated
financial policy, we could raise the rating if GoDaddy maintains or
exceeds current operating trends and commits to maintaining
leverage consistently below 2x and building a cushion within its
credit measures to accommodate M&A opportunities. In this scenario,
the company would also need to demonstrate its willingness to use
excess cash to reduce debt balances rapidly," the rating agency
said.


GREEN FIELDS: Committee Seeks to Hire Rusing Lopez as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Green Fields
School seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Arizona to retain Rusing Lopez & Lizardi, P.L.L.C. as
its legal counsel effective Aug. 12.

The committee requires Rusing Lopez & Lizardi to:

     a. advise and consult the committee with respect to the
Debtor's administration of this chapter 11 case;

     b. attend meetings and negotiate with representatives of the
Debtor, creditors (including secured and unsecured creditors), and
other parties in interest;

     c. advise and counsel the committee in connection with any
contemplated sales of assets, disposition of assets, or business
combinations;

     d. assist and advise the committee in its examination and
analysis of the conduct of the Debtor's affairs;

     e. uphold the interests of the committee, including, without
limitation, the prosecution of actions on its behalf, negotiations
concerning all litigation in which the Debtor is involved, and
reviewing and analyzing of all claims filed against the Debtor's
estate;

     f. analyze, advise, negotiate, and prepare on the committee's
behalf, if necessary and advisable under the circumstances, a
chapter 11 plan, related disclosure statement, and all related
agreements and documents and take any necessary action on the
committee's behalf with respect to any proposed plan;

     g. appear and advance the committee's interests before this
Court, any appellate courts, and the U.S. Trustee; and

     h. prepare on behalf of the committee all necessary motions,
applications, answers, orders, reports, and papers in support of
positions taken by the committee.

The hourly rates for Rusing Lopez & Lizardi lawyers ranges between
approximately $225 to $550. Hourly rates for paralegals range
between $130 and $175.

Jonathan Saffer, Esq., the Rusing Lopez & Lizardi attorney
primarily responsible for this matter, charges $375 an hour for his
services, but his hourly rate will be set at a discounted rate of
$300 an hour.

All other professional services offered by Rusing Lopez & Lizardi
will be discounted by 20 percent.

Rusing Lopez & Lizardi does not hold or represent an interest
adverse to the Debtor's estate and is a "disinterested person"
within the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code,
according to the court filings.

The firm can be reached at:

     Jonathan M. Saffer, Esq.
     Rusing Lopez & Lizardi, PLLC
     6363 N Swan Rd #151
     Tucson, AZ 85718
     Phone: +1 520-792-4800

                About Green Fields School

Green Fields School -- https://www.greenfields.org/ -- was an
independent, non-profit, coeducational school in Tucson, Arizona,
United States.  It provided educational services for elementary,
middle and high school students.  The school was closed on July 9,
2019.

Green Fields School sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 19-08642) on July 14,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $3,116,402
in assets and $2,267,418 in liabilities.  The case is assigned to
Judge Brenda Moody Whinery.


GULFPORT ENERGY: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B+' on Weak Financial Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings downgraded Gulfport Energy Corp. to 'B+' from
'BB-'. The unsecured notes remain 'BB-', supported by the company's
strong reserves and resulting recovery expectation.

The downgrade on Gulfport Energy Corp. reflects
weaker-than-anticipated financial measures due to the decline in
Henry Hub natural gas price realizations, including the recent
reduction in S&P's price assumptions, weak natural gas liquids
(NGL) pricing, and limited above-market hedges beyond 2019. In
addition, S&P now anticipates lower production in 2020 because it
believes the company will reduce capital spending in line with
expected cash flows. Gulfport is well hedged for the remainder of
2019 but has minimal hedges in place for 2020 (15%-20% of expected
natural gas production), which S&P thinks will limit production, as
well as cash flow generation, at current strip pricing."
Additionally, NGL prices remain weak and will further depress cash
flow.

The stable outlook on Gulfport reflects S&P's expectations that the
company will maintain a conservative financial policy while
continuing to develop its SCOOP and Utica asset base. The rating
agency expects the company to maintain FFO to debt greater than 20%
and at least adequate liquidity.

"We could lower the rating if we expect FFO to debt to average
below 20% with no clear path to improvement. This would likely
result from a period of lower commodity prices, in particular
natural gas, that leads to a decline in profitability, or if
management pursues a more aggressive spending plan or increases
shareholder returns, resulting in weaker credit measures," S&P
said.

"We could raise the rating if the company increases its proved
developed reserves and production to levels more comparable with
higher-rated peers or if FFO to debt approaches 45% while
maintaining at least adequate liquidity. This would likely result
from higher hydrocarbon prices and a reduction of the company's
debt," the rating agency said.


GYPSUM RESOURCES: Hires Conway MacKenzie as Financial Advisor
-------------------------------------------------------------
Gypsum Resources, LLC, and Gypsum Resources Materials, LLC seek
authority from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Nevada (Las Vegas) to hire Conway MacKenzie, Inc. as their
financial advisor nunc pro tunc to July 26.

Gypsum requires Conway MacKenzie to:

     a. review and analyze financial and operational issues;

     b. prepare 13 week cash flow forecast;

     c. prepare weekly cash flow variance analysis;

     d. prepare 5-year projections;

     e. prepare valuation of Debtors and their direct and indirect
subsidiaries;

     f. assist the Debtors in hiring financial professionals;

     g. assist Debtors in their Chapter 11 cases, including the
preparation and oversight of its financial statements and schedules
related to the bankruptcy process, monthly operating reports, first
day pleadings, and other information required in their bankruptcy
cases;

     h. assist in providing administrative and financial advice;

     i. participate and assist in court testimony and declarations
if necessary; and

     j. provide other services Debtors may deem appropriate and as
agreed to by the firm.

Conway MacKenzie will charge $155 to $625 per hour for
restructuring services, plus actual out-of-pocket expenses
including travel expenses and other administrative charges.

Conway MacKenzie is "disinterested" within the meaning of Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jeffrey C. Perea
     Conway Mackenzie, Inc.
     333 South Hope Street, Suite 3625
     Los Angeles, CA 90071
     Phone: +1.213.416.6200
     Email: JPerea@ConwayMacKenzie.com

                  About Gypsum Resources

Gypsum Resources is a privately held company in the gypsum mining
business.

Based in Las Vegas, Nevada, Gypsum Resources Materials, LLC and its
affiliate Gypsum Resouces, LLC concurrently filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. D. Nev. Lead Case No. 19-14799) on July 26, 2019. The
petitions were signed by James M. Rhodes, president of Truckee
Springs Holdings, LLC, manager of Gypsum Resources, LLC.

Gypsum Resources Materials estimated $10 million to $50 million in
both assets and liabilities and Gypsum Resouces, LLC estimated $50
million to $100 million in both assets and liabilities.

Brett A. Axelrod, Esq., at Fox Rothschild LLP, represents the
Debtors as counsel.


GYPSUM RESOURCES: Seeks to Hire Fox Rothschild as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Gypsum Resources, LLC, and Gypsum Resources Materials, LLC seek
authority from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Nevada (Las Vegas) to hire Fox Rothschild LLP as their legal
counsel effective July 26.

Fox Rothschild will provide these services in connection with the
Debtor's Chapter 11 cases:

     a. advise the Debtors of their rights and obligations in the
administration of their bankruptcy cases;

     b. attend meetings and negotiations with other parties in
interest on Debtors' behalf;

     c. take all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
Debtors' estates including the prosecution of actions, the defense
of any actions taken against Debtors, negotiations concerning all
litigation in which the Debtors are involved, and objecting to
claims filed against the estates which are believed to be
inaccurate;

     d. seek the bankruptcy court's approval and confirmation of a
plan of reorganization;

     e. represent the Debtors in all proceedings before the
bankruptcy court or other courts of jurisdiction in connection with
their bankruptcy cases, including preparing or reviewing all
motions, answers and orders necessary to protect their interests;

     f. assist the Debtors in developing legal positions and
strategies with respect to all facets of their bankruptcy cases;
and

     g. prepare on the Debtors' behalf necessary applications,
motions, answers, orders and other documents.

Fox Rothschild will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Brett A. Axelrod, Partner     $795
     Audrey Noll, Counsel          $620
     Patricia Chlum, Paralegal     $305

     Partners                       $295 to $965
     Counsel                        $230 to $1,005
     Associates                     $215 to $570
     Legal Assistants/Paralegals    $100 to $440

Prior to the petition date, the Debtors paid Fox Rothschild a
$50,000 advance payment retainer.  Fox Rothschild will also be
reimbursed for work-related expenses incurred.

Brett Axelrod, Esq., a partner at Fox Rothschild, disclosed in
court filings that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Fox Rothschild can be reached at:

     Brett A. Axelrod, Esq.
     FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
     1980 Festival Plaza Drive Ste 700
     Las Vegas, NV 89135
     Tel: (702) 262-6899
     Fax: (702) 597-5503
     E-mail: baxelrod@foxrothschild.com

                  About Gypsum Resources

Gypsum Resources is a privately held company in the gypsum mining
business.

Based in Las Vegas, Nevada, Gypsum Resources Materials, LLC and its
affiliate Gypsum Resouces, LLC concurrently filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. D. Nev. Lead Case No. 19-14799) on July 26, 2019. The
petitions were signed by James M. Rhodes, president of Truckee
Springs Holdings, LLC, manager of Gypsum Resources, LLC.

Gypsum Resources Materials estimated $10 million to $50 million in
both assets and liabilities and Gypsum Resouces, LLC estimated $50
million to $100 million in both assets and liabilities.

Brett A. Axelrod, Esq. at FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP represents the Debtors
as counsel.


HALCON RESOURCES: Clark Hill Represents Multiple Parties
--------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
the law firm of Clark Hill Strasburger provided notice that it is
representing multiple parties in the Chapter 11 cases of Halcon
Resources Corporation, et al.

As of August 20, 2019, the parties listed and their disclosable
economic interests are:

(1) Seitel Data, Ltd.
    10811 South Westview Circle
    Building C, Suite 100
    Houston, TX 77043

    * Executory Contracts

(2) Seitel Data Corp.
    900 Market Street
    Wilmington, DE 19801

    * Executory Contracts

(3) Seitel Offshore Corp.
    10811 South Westview Circle
    Building C, Suite 100
    Houston, TX 77043

    * Executory Contracts

(4) Zurich American Insurance Company
    1299 Zurich Way
    Schaumburg, IL 60196-1056

    * Indemnity Agreement
    * Collateral Trust Agreement

(5) Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
    1299 Zurich Way
    Schaumburg, IL 60196-1056

    * Indemnity Agreement
    * Collateral Trust Agreement

(6) Colonial American Casualty and Surety Company
    1299 Zurich Way
    Schaumburg, IL 60196-1056

    * Indemnity Agreement
    * Collateral Trust Agreement

(7) American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company
    1299 Zurich Way
    Schaumburg, IL 60196-1056

    * Indemnity Agreement
    * Collateral Trust Agreement

Counsel to the multiple parties can be reached at:

         CLARK HILL STRASBURGER
         Duane J. Brescia, Esq.
         720 Brazos, Suite 700
         Austin, TX 78701
         Telephone: (512) 499-3600
         Facsimile: (512) 499-3660
         E-mail: duane.brescia@clarkhillstrasburger.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing from PacerMonitor.com is availble at

http://bankrupt.com/misc/Halcon_Resources_158_Rule2019.pdf

                    About Halcon Resources

Halcon Resources Corporation (OTC PINK: HKRS)is an independent
energy company focused on the acquisition, production, exploration
and development of onshore liquids-rich oil and natural gas assets
in the United States.  During 2017, the Halcon acquired certain
property in the Delaware Basin and divested their assets located in
the Williston Basin in North Dakota and in the El Halon area of
East Texas.  As a result, the properties and drilling activities
are currently focused in the Delaware Basin.  

Halcon Resources and its affiliates previously sought bankruptcy
protection on July 27, 2016 (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 16-11724)
and emerged from bankruptcy in September 2016 after eliminating
$1.8 billion in long-term debt.

Halcon Resources Corporation, along with its subsidiaries, again
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
19-34446) on Aug. 7, 2019, this time to seek confirmation of a
prepackaged plan that would cut debt by $750 million.

The Debtors disclosed $1,798,838,000 in total assets and
$945,175,000 in total liabilities as of March 31, 2019.

Perella Weinburg Partners and Tudor Pickering Holt & Co. are acting
as financial advisors, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP is acting as
legal counsel and FTI Consulting, Inc. is acting as restructuring
advisor to the Company in connection with the Restructuring Plan.
KCC is the claims agent.

Ducera Partners LLC is acting as financial advisor and Paul, Weiss,
Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison is acting as legal advisor to the
Unsecured Noteholders that comprise the Ad Hoc Noteholder Group.


IMPORT SPECIALTIES: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Import Specialties Incorporated
           dba Heartland America
        8085 Century Blvd
        Chaska, MN 55318

Business Description: Import Specialties Incorporated is a
                      privately held company in Chaska, Minnesota
                      that sells products using television,
                      catalog, internet, and mail-order.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 22, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Minnesota (Minneapolis)

Case No.: 19-42563

Judge: Hon. Kathleen H. Sanberg

Debtor's Counsel: John D. Lamey, III, Esq.
                  LAMEY LAW FIRM, P.A.
                  980 Inwood Ave N
                  Oakdale, MN 55128
                  Tel: 651-209-3550
                  E-mail: bankrupt@lameylaw.com
                          JLAMEY@LAMEYLAW.COM

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Mark R. Platt, CEO.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/mnb19-42563.pdf


ISRS REALTY: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
------------------------------------------------
The second amended disclosure Statement explaining the Chapter 11
Plan of IRS Realty LLC and ISRS Realty LLC is approved.

A hearing will be held before the Honorable Robert D. Drain, United
States Bankruptcy Judge, at the United States Bankruptcy Court,
Southern District of New York, 300 Quarropas Street, Courtroom 118,
White Plains, New York, 10601 on October 7, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.,
Eastern Time.

September 30, 2019 at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, is fixed as the
deadline for filing and serving any written objections to (a)
confirmation of the Plan and (b) final applications for allowance
of professional compensation and reimbursement of expenses.

Class 5 Unsecured Claims are impaired and will be paid a Pro Rata
portion of the ISRS Distribution Fund, if any, after the payment in
full in Cash of all ISRS Allowed (a) Administrative Claims, (b)
Priority Claims, (c) post Effective Date legal fees, (d) Class 1
Secured Claims and (e) Class 3 Claims, within ten (10) business
days of the ISRS Closing Date, up to 100% of their Allowed Claims,
with no post-Petition Date interest thereon.

Class 3 Secured Claim are impaired and will be paid in full (i) in
the case of an ISRS Sale or an ISRS Refinancing, in Cash from the
ISRS Distribution Fund on the ISRS Closing Date, (ii) in the event
EWB is the Successful Bidder for the ISRS Property, by EWB on the
EWB Closing Date.

Class 4 Secured Claim are impaired and will be paid in full (i) in
the case of an IRS Sale or IRS Refinancing, in Cash from the IRS
Distribution Fund on the IRS Closing Date or (ii) in the event that
EWB is the Successful Bidder in the Auction, on the applicable EWB
Closing Date. The Class 4 Claimholder shall continue to receive
monthly adequate protection payments until its Class 4 Claim is
satisfied in full hereunder.

Class 6 Unsecured Claims are impaired and will be paid a Pro Rata
portion of the IRS Distribution Fund, if any, after the payment in
full in Cash of all IRS Allowed (a) Administrative Claims, (b)
Priority Claims, (c) post-Effective Date legal fees, (d) Class 2
Secured Claims and (e) Class 4 Claims, within ten (10) business
days of the ISRS Closing Date, up to 100% of their Allowed Claims,
with no post-Petition Date interest thereon.

Class 7 Interests are impaired and will receive a Pro Rata portion
of the remaining proceeds of the IRS Distribution Fund, based upon
the particular percentage of Interest held, after the payment of
all classified and unclassified Allowed Claims and any
post-Effective Date legal fees and costs of IRS’s estate.

Class 8 Interests are impaired and will receive a Pro Rata portion
of the remaining proceeds of the ISRS Distribution Fund, based upon
the particular percentage of Interest held, after the payment of
all classified and unclassified Allowed Claims and any
post-Effective Date legal fees and costs of ISRS’s estate.

The Plan will be funded from the ISRS Proceeds and the IRS Proceeds
and, if necessary, the Debtors and Dr. Sindhwani. The ISRS
Distribution Fund and the IRS Distribution Fund shall be utilized
to satisfy payments consistent with the terms of the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement dated
August 14, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y62cehcq from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for the Debtors:

     Robert L. Rattet, Esq.
     RATTET PLLC
     202 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 300
     White Plains, New York 10601
     Tel: (914) 381-7400

                      About ISRS Realty

ISRS Realty and IRS Realty are single asset real estate debtors (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

ISRS Realty and IRS Realty each filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case Nos. 18-23867 and 18-23868, respectively) on Dec. 5, 2018.  In
the petitions signed by Dr. Rajeev Sindhwani, managing member, the
Debtors each estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.

Julie Cvek Curley, Esq., and Erica R. Aisner, Esq., at DelBello
Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP, serve as the Debtors'
counsel.  On April 2, the Court issued an order granting the
application to employ Rattet PLLC as Substitute Attorneys for the
Debtors.


ISTAR INC: S&P Alters Outlook to Positive, Affirms 'BB-' ICR
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it revised its outlook on iStar Inc. to
positive from stable and affirmed its 'BB-' issuer credit and
senior secured and unsecured debt ratings on iStar Inc. and its
'B-' preferred stock rating.

The positive outlook reflects the firm's reduction in leverage and
iStar's plans to further reduce noncore land and operating
properties. S&P's ratings on iStar also reflect its unique
franchise, concentration in higher-risk commercial real estate
(CRE), and its largely long-term unsecured debt profile and limited
near-term maturities, which support its solid funding and
liquidity.

iStar is a New York-based specialty REIT that finances, invests in,
and develops CRE and real-estate-related projects. It focuses on
less commoditized CRE lending and net leases on real estate, as
well as develops and operates properties and land, most of which it
acquired through foreclosures. The company focuses on
noncommoditized areas of CRE, and iStar's largest investment ($403
million as of June 30, 2019) is in Safehold Inc., a REIT that
invests in ground leases, which iStar started, spun-out in a 2017
IPO, and now manages. iStar has increased its investment in
Safehold because it views it as both a good investment and an
opportunity to work jointly on project financing and leases. iStar
now owns 67% of Safehold, but its voting interest is limited to
41.9% and remains unconsolidated. While S&P believes that Safehold
appears to be an attractive investment so far, it believes that at
35% of adjusted total equity, it is a concentration risk in a
relatively new business and entity.

The positive outlook reflects the company's reduced leverage and
expected reduction in legacy assets.

"While we believe that dispositions of legacy assets should provide
earnings, we believe that ongoing profitability may be challenged
by the firm's ability to sustainably grow the core lending and
on-balance-sheet net leasing portfolios. While earnings from
Safehold should increase, they remains relatively small and will
take time to ramp-up," S&P said, adding that it expects the firm to
maintain its long-term, largely unsecured funding profile and
adequate liquidity.

Over the next 12 months, S&P could raise its ratings if iStar:

-- Maintains its unsecured funding profile and debt to ATE below
3.25x,
-- Reduces legacy assets closer to 10% of total assets, and
-- Demonstrates sustainable core profitability.

Over the same timeframe, S&P could revise the outlook to stable
if:

-- S&P expects leverage to increase above 4.5x, or
-- Asset quality, profitability, or liquidity deteriorate.


JAB OF ROCKLAND: Seeks to Hire PKF O'Connor as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------------
JAB of Rockland, Inc. d/b/a David's Bagels, seeks authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to
employ PKF O'Connor Davies, LLP, as accountant to the Debtor.

JAB of Rockland requires PKF O'Connor to:

   a. prepare and review the Debtor's monthly debtor-in-
      possession operating reports and statements of cash
      receipts and disbursements including notes as to the status
      of tax liabilities and other indebtedness;

   b. prepare of compiled financial statements as of the date of
      filing of the Chapter 11 petition;

   c. prepare the required State and Federal tax filings;

   d. review existing accounting systems and procedures and
      establish new systems and procedures;

   e. assist the Debtor in the development of a plan of
      reorganization;

   f. assist the Debtor in the preparation of a liquidation plan;

   g. appear at creditor's committee meetings, 341(a) meetings,
      and hearings;

   h. assist the Debtor in the preparation of cash flow
      projections; and

   i. consult with counsel for the Debtor in connection with
      operating, financial and other business matters related to
      the ongoing activities of the Debtor.

PKF O'Connor will be paid at these hourly rates:

         Partners                  $385
         Senior Managers           $275
         Managers                  $200
         Seniors                   $175
         Juniors                   $125
         Administrative            $100

PKF O'Connor will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Brian M. Varley, a partner at PKF O'Connor Davies, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

PKF O'Connor can be reached at:

     Brian M. Varley
     PKF O'CONNOR DAVIES, LLP
     300 Tice Blvd., Suite 315
     Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
     Tel: (201) 712-9800

              About JAB of Rockland, Inc.
                 d/b/a David's Bagels

JAB of Rockland, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-23153) on June 11, 2019, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The Debtor is
represented by Elizabeth A. Haas, Esq., at Elizabeth A. Haas, Esq.,
PLLC.



JOHN S. WON: Court Conditionally Approves Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------------------
The disclosure statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan of John S.
Won MD PA is conditionally approved.

The hearing on confirmation of the plan is scheduled on Thursday,
October 3, 2019 at 11:00 AM, 300 Fayetteville Street, 3rd Floor
Courtroom, Raleigh, NC 27602.  September 26, 2019 is fixed as the
last day for filing and serving written objections to confirmation
of the plan.

Class 5 - Allowed General Unsecured Claims. The Plan provides that
Class 5 shall receive monthly payments of $1,000.00 for thirty-six
(36) months, which will be paid pro rata to class members based on
the amount of each class member’s Allowed Claim. The first such
payment shall be made on the first day of the fourth month
following the Effective Date.

Class 3 - Allowed Secured Claim of Xerox Corporation. The Allowed
Secured Claims of Class 3 shall be amortized and paid in monthly
installments, including interest thereon at the Secured Rate, in
the total amount of $472.00 per month over thirty six (36) months.
The First Payment to Class 3 shall be made on the first day of the
first month following the Effective Date.

Class 4 - Allowed Judgment Claim of United States of America. The
Plan provides Class 4 Claims, which consist of the Allowed Claim of
the United States of America with respect to the judgment obtained
in the matter United States of America, et al. v. Dr. John Sunghoon
Won, et al., shall be paid in installments of $1,000.00 per month
until the claims are satisfied in full. The Debtor shall be
entitled to a credit for all amounts paid on the judgment from
other sources. The First Payment to Class 4 shall be made on the
first day of the first month following the Effective Date.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 14, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y45xsbre from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorney for Debtor:

     George F. Sanderson, III, Esq.
     THE SANDERSON LAW FIRM, PLLC
     P.O. Box 6130
     Raleigh, NC 27628
     (984) 867-9300

John S. Won MD PA, filed a voluntary Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr.
E.D.N.C. Case No. 19-01719) on April 16, 2019, and is represented
by George F. Sanderson, Esq., at The Sanderson Law Firm, PLLC.


JRND LLC: Court Conditionally Approves Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Disclosure Statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan of JRND LLC
is conditionally approved.

An evidentiary hearing will be held on September 26, 2019 , at
02:45 PM in Courtroom 6D, 6th Floor, George C. Young Courthouse,
400 West Washington Street, Orlando, FL 32801 to consider and rule
on the disclosure statement and any objections or modifications.

Any party desiring to object to the disclosure statement or to
confirmation must be filed and served its objection no later than
seven days before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

The debtor must file a ballot tabulation no later than four days
before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y33py5kw from Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

                        About JRND LLC

JRND LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-00774) on Feb. 4, 2019.  At the time
of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of less than $1 million.  The case is assigned to Judge
Cynthia C. Jackson.  Ainsworth and Branson Law, PLLC, is the
Debtor's legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case.


JS & ES HOLDINGS: Sept. 12 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------------
The hearing on the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement explaining
the Chapter 11 Plan of JS & ES Holdings, LLC will be held before
the Honorable Michael B. Kaplan on September 12, 2019 at 10:00am,
Courtroom 8, USBC 402 East State Street, Trenton, NJ 08608.
Written objections to the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement must
be filed and served no later than 14 days prior to the hearing
before this Court.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 12, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y3ffjevo from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.
   
Attorney for the Debtor:

     Thaddeus R. Maciag, Esq.
     MACIAG LAW, LLC
     475 Wall Street
     Princeton, New Jersey 08540
     Tel: (908) 704-8800

JS & ES Holdings, LLC, filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-28149) on September 11, 2018.


KP ENGINEERING: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: KP Engineering, LP
             5555 Old Jacksonville Highway
             Tyler, TX 75703

Business Description: The Debtors are primarily engaged in the
                      business of designing and executing
                      customized engineering, procurement, and
                      construction ("EPC") projects for the
                      refining, midstream, and chemical
                      industries.  As an EPC contractor, KPE
                      generally enters into agreements with owners
                      pursuant to which KPE LP will design a
                      facility, procure the needed equipment and
                      materials, and supervise construction of the
                      facility.  Visit https://www.kpe.com for
                      more information.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 22, 2019

Two affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                      Case No.
     ------                                      --------
     KP Engineering, LP (Lead Case)              19-34698
     KP Engineering LLC                          19-34699

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas (Houston)

Judge: Hon. David R. Jones

Debtors' Counsel: Gregory Getty Hesse, Esq.
                  HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
                  1445 Ross Ave, Suite 3700
                  Dallas, TX 75202-2799
                  Tel: 214-468-3300
                       214-979-3000
                  Fax: 214-468-3599
                  Email: ghesse@huntonak.com

                    - and -

                  Edward A. Clarkson, III, Esq.
                  HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
                  600 Travis Street, Suite 4200
                  Houston, Texas 77002
                  Tel: (713) 220-4200
                  Fax: (713) 220-4285
                  Email: edwardclarkson@HuntonAK.com

                    - and -

                  Justin F. Paget, Esq.
                  Jennifer E. Wuebker, Esq. (pro hac vice pending)
                  HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
                  Riverfront Plaza, East Tower
                  951 East Byrd Street
                  Richmond, Virginia 23219
                  Tel: (804) 788-8200
                  Fax: (804) 788-8218
                  Email: jpaget@HuntonAK.com
                  jwuebker@HuntonAK.com

                    - and -

                  Christopher Adams, Esq.
                  OKIN ADAMS LLC
                  1113 Vine Street, Suite 240
                  Houston, Texas 77002
                  Tel: (713) 228-4100
                  Fax: (888) 865-2118
                  Email: cadams@okinadams.com

Debtors'
Restructuring
Advisor:          Douglas J. Brickley
                  CLARO GROUP, LLC

Debtors'
Claims &
Noticing
Agent:            OMNI MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.        
                  https://is.gd/QvXmOA

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $50 million to $100 million

The petitions were signed by Brandon T. Steele, president.

A full-text copy of KP Engineering, LP's petition is available for
free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb19-34698.pdf

Consolidated List of Debtors' 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Turner Industries Group, LLC                         $6,608,503
P.O. Box 3688
Baton Rouge, LA 70821

2. ROWC Energy Services                                 $4,300,505
PO BOX 4177
Houma, LA 70361

3. Beard Construction Group, LLC                        $3,583,843
3970 Rosedale Road
Port Allen, LA 70767
Attn: Howard J. Currie Jr.

4. The Reynolds Company                                 $3,006,602
P. O. Box 896689
Charlotte, NC 28289-6689

5. Saulsbury Industries Inc.                            $2,867,580
P.O. Box 222080
Dallas, TX 75222-2080

6. Instrument Commissioning Group                       $2,860,420
Phoenix Capital Group, LLC
P.O. Box 1415
Des Moines, IA 50305-1415

7. Cajun IDC, LLC                                       $2,753,052
Cajun Constructors, Inc.
P.O. Box 104
Baton Rouge, LA 70821-0104

8. Hancock Mechanical                                   $2,544,273
P.O. Box 207
Bentonia, MS 39040

9. Gregg Industrial Insulators                          $2,453,052
P.O. Box 91473
Chicago, IL 60693

10. Compressor Systems, Inc.                            $2,368,333
P.O. Box 843960
Dallas, TX 75284-3960

11. Bounds Construction II LLC                          $1,875,009
50 Allen Hill Road
Tylertown, MS 39667

12. CED Interstate Electric Co.                         $1,706,686
P.O. Box 206562
Dallas, TX 75320

13. TII Logistics Inc.                                  $1,637,700
P.O. Box 644831
Pittsburgh, PA 15264-4831

14. MRC Global (US) Inc.                                $1,397,874
P.O. Box 204392
Dallas, TX 75320-4392

15. Dealers Electrical Supply Co.                       $1,285,517
P.O. Box 2535
Waco, TX 76702-2535

16. Pierce Const & Maint Co., Inc.                      $1,251,978
P.O. Box 485
Petal, MS 39465

17. J.R. Manufacturing, LP                              $1,159,504
6485 Thomas Rd
Houston, TX 77041

18. Innovative Industrial                                 $942,492
Fabricators, LLC
P.O. Box 621
Keithville, LA 71047-0621

19. Credos Fabrications, LLC                              $930,507
P.O. Box 199
Quitman, MS 39355

20. Globe, LLC                                            $925,000
Attn: Charles Daniel
20 West 7th Street
New Albany, IN 47150

21. Bowman Specilized Services                            $917,744
P.O. Box 38
Carlsbad, NM 88221-0038

22. Powell Electrical Systems                             $835,854
8550 Mosley Road
Houston, TX 77075

23. Arcosa Tank LLC                                       $775,085
fka Trinity Containers LLC
PO Box 733000
Dallas, TX 75373-3000

24. S&S Energy Services                                   $578,554
4530 Hwy 69 N
Lufkin, TX 75904
Matt Sanders

25. Zeeco, Inc.                                           $576,440
P.O. Box 974988
Dallas, TX 75397-4988

26. Heatec                                                $569,245
PO Box 934286
Atlanta, GA 31193-4286

27. BWFS Industries, LLC                                  $494,834
6019 Greenway Manor Lane
Spring, TX 77373

28. Smith & Loveless, Inc.                                $488,620
P.O. Box 2383
Shawnee Mission, KS 66201

29. Wholesale Electric Supply                             $465,247
Company of Houston, Inc.
P.O. Box 732778
Dallas, TX 75373-2778

30. Fisher Controls International                         $449,911
22737 Network Place
Chicago, IL 60673-1227


KP ENGINEERING: Files for Chapter 11 Amid Dispute with Targa
------------------------------------------------------------
KP Engineering, LP, formerly known as KOCH Partners LP, and general
partner KP Engineering, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection, citing
that they lacked funds to defend itself in disputes against Hancock
Mechanical LLC, Targa Resources Corp. and other parties in
connection with the cryogenic processing plant in Midland County,
Texas that KP was contracted to construct.

The Debtors are primarily engaged in the business of designing and
executing customized engineering, procurement, and construction
("EPC") projects for the refining, midstream, and chemical
industries.  As an EPC contractor, KPE generally enters into
agreements with owners pursuant to which KPE LP will design a
facility, procure the needed equipment and materials, and supervise
construction of the facility.  KPE LP typically retains
subcontractors to perform construction pursuant to agreements
and/or purchase orders between KPE LP and the subcontractors.

The Debtors generate nearly all of their revenue from EPC
contracts.  All of the EPC contracts and other business functions
and operations are managed by KPE LP.  The sole business function
of KPE LLC is to serve as the general partner of KPE LP.
Non-debtor BTS Enterprises, Inc., owns 99% of KPE LP, and KPE LLC
owns the remaining 1%.

                   Prepetition Capital Structure

On June 8, 2018, debtor KPE LP executed a Promissory Note in the
original principal amount of $25,000,000 along with a Credit
Agreement and a Security Agreement between debtor KPE LP, as
borrower, and Texas Capital Bank, NA, as lender.  The 2018 Note
paid and replaced a 2017 note and terminated a revolving loan.

Prior to the Petition Date, Brandon T. Steele, individually, owed
debtor KPE LP the sum of $13,169,773 in connection with certain
prepetition transactions between Mr. Steele and the Debtors.
Immediately prior to the Petition Date, Mr. Steele repaid the
Partner Receivable, the proceeds of which were paid by the Debtors
to Texas Capital Bank.  Thus, on the Petition Date, the outstanding
balance under the Prepetition Loan Documents is $8,743,207.

                        Road the Chapter 11

Kyle McCoy, executive vice president and CFO of KPE LP, recounts
that effective Jan. 17, 2017, KPE LP and Targa Resources Corp.'s
Targa Pipeline Mid-Continent WestTex LLC, entered into an Agreement
for Engineering, Procurement and Construction (the "Joyce EPC
Agreement") pursuant to which KPE LP designed, procured equipment,
and constructed a 200 million cubic feet per day gas cryogenic
processing plant (the "Joyce Plant") in Upton County, Texas.  The
Joyce Plant was completed and is fully operational.  All
subcontractors and suppliers utilized during the construction of
the Joyce Plant have been paid.  Despite the completion of the
Joyce Plant, KPE LP sustained a significant economic loss.

Effective Aug. 3, 2017, KPE LP and Targa entered into an Agreement
for Engineering, Procurement and Construction (the "Johnson EPC
Agreement") pursuant to which KPE LP agreed to design, procure
equipment, and construct a 200 million cubic feet per day gas
cryogenic processing plant (the "Johnson Plant") in Midland County,
Texas.

However, when the Johnson Plant was near completion, Targa stopped
making payments to KPE LP under the Johnson EPC Agreement.  As a
result of the nonpayment, KPE LP was unable to pay its
subcontractors and suppliers for the Johnson Project.  Targa also
implemented certain change orders that impacted the design,
completion timeline and cost of the Johnson Project, after which
KPE LP engaged in discussions with Targa regarding Targa's
nonpayment.

On Aug. 3, 2019, Targa terminated the Johnson EPC Agreement and
removed KPE LP from the job site.  Targa asserted that its
termination was due to KPE LP's failure to pay subcontractors and
suppliers.

On Aug. 24, 2018, Hancock Mechanical, LLC d/b/a Hancock Mechanical
Welding & Fabrication filed a lawsuit against KPE LP in the State
District Court in Midland County, seeking over $2,500,000 in
damages in relation to Johnson Project (the "Johnson Litigation").

In addition, a significant number of the subcontractors who
supplied services and supplies for the Johnson Plant have filed
claims against KPE LP (collectively, the "Subcontractor Claims") in
the Johnson Litigation or as other standalone lawsuits.  

On June 10, 2019, Targa filed cross claims in the Johnson
Litigation against KPE for "monetary relief over $1,000,000."

According to Mr. McCoy, KPE LP lacks the financial resources to
continue funding the Johnson Litigation, defend the Subcontractor
Claims, and to satisfy the resulting judgments, if any.

Mr. McCloy explains that the Johnson Litigation and Subcontractor
Claims have created financial strain for the ongoing business
operations of KPE and have distracted KPE personnel from day-to-day
operations, making it difficult for KPE to continue to perform
under its EPC contracts.

                DIP Financing and Cash Collateral

Contemporaneously herewith, with the First Day Motions, the Debtors
have filed a motion seeking, among other things, interim and final
approval from the Bankruptcy Court of definitive documentation for
the DIP Facility on the terms and conditions set forth in the DIP
Note, which, if approved by the Bankruptcy Court as proposed, would
contain the following terms, among others:

   * a superpriority and priming debtor-in-possession revolving
credit facility in an amount of up to $4 million, subject to
availability under the Debtors' borrowing base thereunder, provided
by BTS (the "DIP Lender"), with $750,000 of such DIP Facility
available to the Debtors upon entry of the Interim Order and the
remaining $3,250,000 of such DIP Facility available to the Debtors
upon entry of the Final Order;

    * the maturity date of the DIP Facility will be the earlier of:
(i) the date a confirmed plan of reorganization becomes effective
or (ii) Aug. 15, 2020;

    * interest will accrue at the Note Rate;

    * the obligations and liabilities under the DIP Facility will
be secured by a valid, binding, continuing, enforceable,
fully-perfected first priority, senior priming lien on, and
security interest in, substantially all assets and property of the
Debtors' estates and will be guaranteed by each of the Debtors (the
"DIP Lien"); which DIP Lien will be deemed assigned to the
Prepetition Lender upon entry of the Interim Order; and

    * the Interim Order provides that the DIP Lien will prime the
Prepetition Liens at the consent of the Prepetition Lender.  The
Debtors anticipate closing the DIP Facility promptly following
approval by the Bankruptcy Court of the DIP Motion and entry of the
Interim Order.

                       About KP Engineering

KP Engineering, LP and KP Engineering LLC -- https://www.kpe.com/
-- are primarily engaged in the business of designing and executing
customized engineering, procurement, and construction ("EPC")
projects for the refining, midstream, and chemical industries.  As
an EPC contractor, KPE generally enters into agreements with owners
pursuant to which KPE LP will design a facility, procure the needed
equipment and materials, and supervise construction of the
facility.

KP Engineering, LP and KP Engineering LLC sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case Nos.  19-34698 and 19-34699) on
Aug. 23, 2019.

The Hon. David R. Jones is the case judge.

The Debtors estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $50
million to $100 million in liabilities.

The Debtors tapped HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP as counsel; and CLARO
GROUP, LLC, as restructuring advisors.  OMNI MANAGEMENT GROUP,
INC., is the claims agent.


LAKE ROAD WELDING: Case Summary & 15 Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Lake Road Welding Co., Inc.
           d/b/a LRW Fabricators
        P.O. Box 4711
        Wichita Falls, TX 76308

Business Description: Lake Road Welding Co. provides structural
                      steel fabrication as well as industrial and
                      commercial applications from Wichita Falls,
                      Texas.  The Company has the capability and
                      expertise to produce a complete line of
                      structural steel products for industrial and
                      commercial structures, from the most basic
                      columns and beams, to complicated stairs,
                      handrails and canopies.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 22, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Texas (Wichita Falls)

Case No.: 19-70239

Judge: Hon. Harlin DeWayne Hale

Debtor's Counsel: Areya Holder, Esq.
                  HOLDER LAW
                  901 Main Street, Suite 5320
                  Dallas, TX 75202
                  Tel: 972-438-8800
                  Fax: 972-438-8825
                  E-mail: areya@holderlawpc.com

Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Jerry Morgan, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 15 unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-70239.pdf


LASER SITEWORK: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Laser Sitework Company
        P.O. Box 8021
        Greenville, NC 27835

Business Description: Laser Sitework Company --
                      http://www.lasersitework.com/-- is a turn-
                      key site development/heavy civil contractor
                      located in Greenville, North Carolina.
                      The Company offers complete site package and
                      heavy civil contracting to multiple markets
                      including commercial and residential
                      development.  It provides services ranging
                      from lot clearing to landscaping.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 22, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of North Carolina
       (Greenville Division)

Case No.: 19-03866

Judge: Hon. David M. Warren

Debtor's Counsel: Christopher Scott Kirk, Esq.
                  C. SCOTT KIRK, ATTORNEY AT LAW, PLLC
                  1025C Director Court
                  Greenville, NC 27858
                  Tel: 252 689-6249
                  E-mail: scott@csklawoffice.com

Total Assets: $521,158

Total Liabilities: $1,395,008

The petition was signed by Anthony Baker, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/nceb19-03866.pdf


LEAP ACADEMY: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable on Debt Refinancing
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised the outlook on its 'BB-' rating on New
Jersey Economic Development Authority's revenue debt, issued for
LEAP Cramer Hill LLC on behalf of LEAP Academy University Charter
School, to stable from negative and affirmed the rating.

The outlook revision reflects S&P's opinion of the academy
refinancing its $8.4 million Chase Bank N.A. loan, with a balloon
payment previously due in September 2018, with an unrated $7.5
million fixed-amortization loan, with a level payment schedule
through July 1, 2043, from Republic First Bank. The unrated loan is
not subject to cross-default with the rated bonds, which the rating
service views favorably. It, however, is S&P's view that there is
heightened risk of the bank debt accelerating due to permissive
events of default. S&P Global Ratings, however, factors this risk
into the current rating.

"We could lower the rating during the outlook period if
unrestricted reserves were to fail to improve or operations were to
produce significant deficits, pressuring maximum annual debt
service coverage," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Beatriz
Peguero. "In our opinion, raising the rating or revising the
outlook to positive would be unlikely due to
contingent-liquidity-risk exposure and low unrestricted reserves on
hand. We, however, could raise the rating or revise the outlook to
positive if the school were to improve cash significantly so it
could cover all bank-debt-related contingent-liquidity risk."

The stable outlook reflects S&P's opinion that during the one-year
outlook period, LEAP will likely sustain near-term sufficient
enrollment, healthy demand, and modest financial performance
consistent with MADS coverage. The rating service also expects the
school will likely continue to improve liquidity.

LEAP Academy's general obligation to make lease payments to LEAP
Cramer Hill LLC secures the series 2014 bonds; payments will cover
debt service. An absolute assignment of lease payments, mortgage
lien on financed property, and debt-service reserve further secure
the bonds.


LIFE TIME: S&P Raises Sr. Secured Credit Facility Rating to 'BB-'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issue-level rating on Chanhassen,
Minn.-based fitness club operator Life Time Inc.'s senior secured
credit facility to 'BB-' from 'B+' and revised the recovery rating
to '1' from '2' following the company's postponement of its plan to
issue a $500 million secured term loan B due 2026 due to
unfavorable market conditions.

S&P assigned a 'B+' issue-level rating and '2' recovery rating to
the proposed term loan on July 31, 2019. Life Time planned to use
the proceeds mostly to refinance its existing $450 million 8.5%
senior unsecured notes due 2023. The company stated that during the
week of August 5, market conditions dampened its desired pricing on
the transaction, and Life Time decided to postpone indefinitely.
The $450 million unsecured notes due 2023 will remain in the
company's capital structure. Also on July 31, 2019, S&P revised its
recovery rating to '2' from '1' and lowered the issue-level rating
to 'B+' from 'BB-' on the company's existing secured debt,
reflecting lower assumed recovery prospects for secured lenders due
to the proposed incremental secured term loan issuance.

Given Life Time has announced an indefinite postponement of the
proposed refinancing plan, this reflects the removal of the
previously proposed incremental secured debt issuance from the
assumed capital structure and very high recovery prospects for
lenders.

S&P affirmed the 'B' issuer credit rating on July 31, 2019. It and
the stable outlook are unchanged because the postponed refinancing
transaction does not materially change credit measures."

Issue Ratings--Recovery Analysis

Key Analytical Factors

-- S&P's recovery rating on Life Times's senior secured credit
facility is '1', indicating its expectation for very high
(90%-100%; rounded estimate: 95%) recovery for lenders in the event
of a payment default.

-- S&P's recovery rating on Life Time's senior unsecured 8.5%
notes remains '6', indicating its expectation for negligible
(0%-10%) recovery for lenders in the event of a payment default.

-- S&P's simulated default scenario contemplates a default
occurring in 2022, reflecting a substantial decline in cash flow
due to prolonged economic weakness and increased competitive
pressures, contributing to severe customer attrition.

-- S&P believes that if the company were to default, it would
continue to have a viable business model, given Life Time's
high-end full-service clubs, and the high quality of the company's
real estate. As a result, the rating agency believes that lenders
would achieve greater value through reorganization than through a
liquidation of the business.

-- S&P assumes a reorganization following default, using an
emergence EBITDA multiple of 6.5x to value the company. This is a
higher multiple than it uses for most other rated fitness club
operators, and reflects the company's larger proportion of owned
clubs and the high quality of real estate in comparison to peers,
as all of Life Time's clubs have been designed in a manner that
would allow them to be easily converted into Class A office space.

Simulated Default Assumptions

-- Year of default: 2022
-- EBITDA at emergence: $311 million
-- EBITDA multiple: 6.5x
-- Revolving credit facility: 85% drawn at default

Simplified Waterfall

-- Net enterprise value (after 5% administrative costs): $1,923
million
-- Obligor/nonobligor split: 100%/0%
-- Estimated priority claims (mortgage debt): $135 million
-- Remaining recovery value: $1,788 million
-- Estimated first-lien claims: $1,811 million
-- Value available for first-lien claims: $1,788 million
    —Recovery range: 90%-100% (rounded estimate: 95%)
-- Estimated senior unsecured notes claims: $469 million
-- Estimated senior secured deficiency claims: $23 million
-- Estimated nondebt unsecured claims: $85 million
-- Estimated total unsecured claims: $577 million
-- Value available for unsecured claim: $0 million
    —Recovery range: 0%-10% (rounded estimate: 0%)
All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.


LOGISTICS BUDDY: Wins Final Approval to Sell Receivables, Use Cash
------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Dakota
authorized, on a final basis, Logistics Buddy Transportation, LLC,
to sell accounts receivable with a value of up to $665,860.35 to
WEX Bank, pursuant to an Accounts Purchase Agreement, as amended.

The Debtor is authorized to use cash collateral of up to $665,860,
which includes all cash collateral previously authorized.  Wex Bank
is granted, retroactive to the Debtor’s Petition Date, a first
priority lien and security interest in all the types of collateral
granted to WEX Bank as security under the APA.

As additional adequate protection, the Debtor shall pay the
Internal Revenue Service:  

   * $6,000 on the last day of each month from September 2019
through November 2019;

   * $8,500 on Dec. 31, 2019; and

   * $11,831 on Jan. 31, 2020 and on the last day of each month
thereafter until a plan is confirmed.

Payments to the IRS shall be mailed to:

         Internal Revenue Service
         500 Woodward Ave., Stop 15
         Detroit, Michigan 48226

Nothing in the Court order will constitute an admission neither by
WEX Bank nor by the IRS that the protection granted is adequate.  

A copy of the Court Order can be accessed for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/Logistics_B_Cash_Ord.pdf

                     About Logistics Buddy

Logistics Buddy Transportation, LLC, a cargo and freight company
based in Sioux Falls, S.D., sought Chapter 11 protection ( Bankr.
D.S.D. Case No. 19-40294) on July 5, 2019.  The Debtor's assets as
of the petition date range from $500,000 to $1 million, and its
liabilities range from $1 million to $10 million.  The case is
assigned to Hon. Charles L. Nail, Jr.  Gerry & Kulm Ask, Prof. LLC,
led by name partner Clair R. Gerry, is serving as counsel to the
Debtor.


LYNWOOD HOLDINGS: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------
The Joint Amended Disclosure Statement filed by Lynwood Holdings,
Inc., and its affiliate, is approved.  The hearing on confirmation
of the Amended Plans is scheduled on September 18, 2019 at 11:00
A.M., in Courtroom, US Courthouse, 116 N Main St., Harrisonburg, VA
22802.  September 11, 2019 is fixed as the last day for filing and
serving written objections to confirmation of the Amended Plans.

The Second Amended Disclosure Statement provides that, except to
the extent that the Holder of a Claim in Class 7 - General
Unsecured Claims agrees to less favorable treatment, each Holder
not otherwise treated in another Class, shall receive its pro-rata
share of the Distribution Amount from Lynwood Virginia on each
Distribution Date, commencing after complete satisfaction of all
Allowed Claims in other Classes, Allowed Fee Claims and/or Allowed
Administrative Claims until (a) such Allowed Unsecured Claims have
been paid in full or (b) the fifth Distribution Date.

Intercompany Obligations and Insider Claims (as of the Petition
Date) will not participate in the distributions but instead will be
carried on the books and records of each Lynwood Entity as
determined in the business judgment of said entity so long as the
same is done in a manner that is appropriate under the Tax Code of
the United States of America. The obligations of the Lynwood
Entities with respect to Claims in Class 7 shall not be secured.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at https://tinyurl.com/y547e5t5 from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Counsel to the Debtors:

     Lynn L. Tavenner, Esq.
     Paula S. Beran, Esq.
     David N. Tabakin, Esq.
     Tavenner & Beran, PLC
     20 North 8th Street
     Richmond, Virginia 23219
     Tel: (804) 783-8300
     Email: ltavenner@tb-lawfirm.com
            pberan@tb-lawfirm.com
            dtabakin@tb-lawfirm.com

                  About Lynwood Holdings Inc.

Based in Front Royal, Virginia, Lynwood Holdings, Inc. and its
affiliate filed for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. W.D. Va. Lead Case No. 18-50784) on Aug. 31, 2018,
estimating $1 million to $10 million in assets and liabilities.
The petitions were signed by Walt L. Moyer, president.  The Hon.
Rebecca B. Connelly is the case judge.  Lynn Lewis Tavenner at
Tavenner & Beran, PLC, is the Debtors' counsel.


MA ALTERNATIVE: Court Endorses Stay of NICS Suit Due to Bankruptcy
------------------------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman recommends staying the case
captioned NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY OF THE SOUTH, Plaintiff, v. MA
ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC., and SHERRY HENRY, Defendants,
Case No. 6:19-cv-13-Orl-37LRH (M.D. Fla.) in light of the
bankruptcy of MA Alternative.

On Jan. 8, 2019, Plaintiff National Indemnity Company of the South
filed an amended complaint for declaratory relief against
Defendants MA Alternative Transport Services, Inc., and Sherry
Henry. Plaintiff insured MA Alternative pursuant to a business
automobile insurance policy. Ms. Henry was allegedly injured in a
motor vehicle accident while she was a passenger in a van owned and
operated by MA Alternative. Ms. Henry filed a lawsuit in state
court against MA Alternative, a clerk's default was entered against
MA Alternative, and Ms. Henry ultimately obtained a
5-million-dollar jury verdict and final judgment. Plaintiff seeks a
declaration that because MA Alternative failed to adhere to
post-suit obligations set forth in the insurance policy, the policy
does not cover Ms. Henry's bodily injury claim against MA
Alternative, and Plaintiff owes no duty to defend or indemnify MA
Alternative for the claims asserted in Ms. Henry's state court
lawsuit.

Here, Plaintiff's claims against both Defendants are inextricably
interwoven because the only issues are whether the insurance policy
covers Ms. Henry's bodily injury claim against MA Alternative and
whether Plaintiff owes any duty to defend or indemnify MA
Alternative against such a claim, which are the only issues
presented regardless of whether the case proceeds solely against
Ms. Henry. Under these circumstances, the Court recommends that the
case should be stayed in its entirety unless and until the
Bankruptcy Court grants Plaintiff relief from the automatic stay.

A copy of the Court's Report and Recommendation dated March 26,
2019 is available at https://bit.ly/2ZrYhdy from Leagle.com.

National Indemnity Company of the South, Plaintiff, represented by
John W. Weihmuller -- jweihmuller@butler.legal -- Butler Weihmuller
Katz Craig LLP & Brian D. Webb -- bwebb@butler.legal -- Butler
Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP.

Sherry Henry, Defendant, represented by John Phillip Fischer,
Fischer Redavid PLLC.

             About MA Alternative Transport Services

MA Alternative Transport Services, Inc., a company that provides
non-emergency medical transport services, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
19-00956) on Feb. 14, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  Frank Martin Wolff, P.A. is the Debtor's
legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.


MAGNUM CONSTRUCTION: Committee Objects to Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Magnum
Construction Management, LLC f/k/a Munilla Construction, LLC, by
and through undersigned counsel, submits the following limited
objection to the First Amended Disclosure Statement proposed by
Magnum Construction Management, LLC f/k/a Munilla Construction
Management, LLC.

Committee complains that the Disclosure Statement lists the
properties being pledged it does not provide, the source of funding
used to purchase the real estate (i.e. Debtor funds/funding?), the
proposed use of the Real Estate prior to the pledging and by whom,
disclosing the value calculation of the contribution, or explaining
the nature of the pledge to Travelers.

Committee asserts that the Debtor should disclose those actions to
the extent, albeit partial, that the Debtor does know.

Committee points out that the Plan must provide funding for the
duties and tasks to be undertaken by the Plan Administrator.

     Counsel to the Committee:

     Kristopher E. Aungst
     Michael C. Foster
     WARGO & FRENCH, LLP
     201 S. Biscayne Blvd.
     Suite 1000
     Miami, Florida 33131
     Telephone: (305) 777-6000
     Facsimile: (305) 777-6001
     kaungst@wargofrench.com
     mfoster@wargofrench.com

                   About Magnum Construction

Magnum Construction Management, LLC -- https://www.mcm-us.com/ --
is a construction company specializing in heavy civil construction
in the areas of transportation, airport infrastructure, roads,
bridges, government buildings and schools.  It is headquartered in
South Miami, Florida, but also has offices in (i) Broward County,
Florida, and (ii) Irving, Texas.  As of the Petition Date, MCM
employs a total of 292 people.

Magnum Construction Management filed a voluntary petition under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr S.D. Fla. Case No.
19-12821) on March 1, 2019.  In the petition signed by CFO Gilberto
Ruizcalderon, the Debtor estimated $50 million to $100 million in
assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities.  The Debtor
is represented by Paul A. Avron, Esq., at Berger Singerman LLP.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 on March 14, 2019, appointed three
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case of Magnum Construction Management, LLC.  The
Committee tapped Wargo & French, LLP as its legal counsel.


MALCOLM CURTIS: Court Dismisses United States Lawsuit
-----------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the stipulation entered between the parties, District
Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald dismisses the case captioned UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, Chapter 11, Appellant(s), v. MALCOLM CURTIS AND
JUDITH CURTIS, Appellee(s), Case No. 5:18-cv-02170-MWF (C.D. Cal.)

A copy of the Court's Order dated March 27, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/31Yys2g from Leagle.com.

United States of America, Appellant, represented by Jolene Tanner,
Office of US Attorney.

Malcom Curtis & Judith Curtis, Appellees, represented by Rebekah
Len Parker, Rebekah Parker Law Offices.

United States Trustee, Appellee, pro se.

Malcolm Curtis and Judith Curtis sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-15373) on June 15, 2016.  The Debtor
tapped Rebekah L Parker, Esq., as counsel.



MARVIN BRODY: Arizona Court Affirms Ruling in Favor of Polsinelli
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned MARVIN BRODY, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,
v. POLSINELLI, P.C., Defendant/Appellee, No. 1 CA-CV 18-0325 (Ariz.
App.), the Court of Appeals of Arizona affirmed the superior
court's denial of Marvin and Nancy Brody's Request for Rule 56(d)
Relief and the entry of two partial summary judgments dismissing
their legal malpractice claim against Polsinelli, P.C.

Marvin Brody filed the lawsuit alleging that Polsinelli, a law
firm, mishandled litigation in bankruptcy court relating to Brody's
Chapter 11 reorganization plan and mishandled litigation in
superior court relating to property owned by Brody Family
Investments Limited Partnership.

Brody alleged Polsinelli was liable for negligence, breach of
fiduciary duty, and negligent supervision. Included in those
allegations was the contention that at the time they authorized
Polsinelli to file the lawsuit against Scott Jung they also
directed that Polsinelli file a new lis pendens against the subject
property, and that Polsinelli's failure to do so was a departure
from the applicable standard of care, and harmful to Brody's
economic interests. In that regard, Brody certified in the
complaint that expert testimony was necessary to prove the licensed
professional's standard of care or liability for the claim. See
Ariz. Rev. Stat. In October of 2015, Plaintiffs identified their
expert witness, David Vandeventer, and timely provided his
Preliminary Expert Affidavit.

In September of 2017, after the close of discovery, Polsinelli
moved for partial summary judgment in the bankruptcy matter and
partial summary judgment in the superior court matter, arguing, in
part, that Brody could not prove his claims because there was, as a
matter of law, insufficient expert testimony regarding the element
of causation. In response, Brody filed the expert's "Supplemental
Affidavit." After the motions for summary judgment were fully
briefed, Brody filed a "Request for Rule 56(d) Relief" seeking
leave to utilize the newly-filed expert's Supplemental Affidavit.
The superior court denied the Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure
("Rule") 56(d) request as both untimely and lacking merit.

The superior court granted both motions for partial summary
judgment. After Brody's motion for reconsideration was denied, the
court entered final judgment dismissing Brody's claims with
prejudice.

Brody raises three issues on appeal. He argues that: (1) the
superior court abused its discretion by denying his Request for
Rule 56(d) Relief; (2) the superior court erred by granting summary
judgment in the bankruptcy matter; and (3) the superior court erred
by granting summary judgment in the superior court matter.

Here, Brody relies on inadmissible evidence to show Polsinelli
caused his injuries; specifically, Brody cites email communications
which allegedly show that, had Polsinelli provided sufficient
information, Brody would have earlier settled the lawsuit with
Geared. Polsinelli argues that those emails are not in the record.
Regardless, emails are hearsay and therefore are not considered in
deciding motions for summary judgment. Because the expert provided
no admissible opinions on causation, the Preliminary Expert
Affidavit is insufficient under A.R.S. section 12-2602 as a matter
of law and does not serve to raise a triable issue. Accordingly,
the superior court did not err.

The Preliminary Expert Affidavit also provides insufficient expert
testimony on the standard of care in the superior court matter. In
a legal malpractice action, unless the attorney's negligence is "so
grossly apparent that a lay person would have no difficulty
recognizing it," expert testimony is required. Expert testimony is
required "to establish the standard of care by which the
professional actions of an attorney are measured and to determine
whether the attorney deviated from the proper standard." Here,
while the expert's disclosed opinion was that it was below the
standard of care for Polsinelli "not to follow Plaintiffs
instructions," such disclosed opinion does not inform the trier of
fact as to what a reasonably prudent lawyer would have done under
the circumstances. Brody's expert testimony is insufficient.
Accordingly, the superior court did not err in granting the motion
for partial summary judgment in the superior court matter.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision dated March 26, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2ZrslBW from Pacermonitor.com.

Dow Law Office, Phoenix, By David W. Dow , Co-counsel for
Plaintiffs/Appellants.

Marvin Brody Attorney at Law, Woodbine, Maryland, By Marvin Brody ,
Co-counsel for Plaintiffs/Appellants.

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLC, Phoenix, By Dale A. Danneman ,
Jon D. Weiss , Counsel for Defendant/Appellee.

Marvin Brody filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Ariz. Case No. 13-01848) on Feb. 11, 2013.


MCCLAIN TRUCKING: Court Dismisses Chapter 11 Case
-------------------------------------------------
A hearing was held on August 14, 2019, on the U.S. Trustee's Motion
to Convert, or in the Alternative, Dismiss McClain Trucking, LLC's
case, along with the Debtor's objection to the request.  After
hearing arguments from counsel, and for reasons orally rendered,
Judge Douglas D. Dodd of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Louisiana ordered that the bankruptcy case is
dismissed.

Prior to the Aug. 14 hearing, the Debtor filed a small business
chapter 11 plan and accompanying disclosure statement proposing
that General Unsecured Class, which are impaired, will be paid a
monthly payment of $1,038.99, beginning 30 days from confirmation
and ending 72 months, or, in the alternative, get a 10% lump sum.

Secured claim of North Mills Trust are impaired. With a total claim
of $49,434.27. Monthly payment of $322.10. Payments Begin in 30
days from plan confirmation. Payments End on 72 months from plan
confirmation.

Secured claim of TAB are impaired. With a total claim of
$105,341.29. Monthly payment of $1,339.53. Payments Begin in 30
days from confirmation. Payments End on 72 months.

1122(b) Convenience Class are impaired. Shall be paid in full in
cash within sixty days of the effective date of the Plan.

Equity interest holders are impaired. Subject to fixed compensation
during the term of the plan or until all allowed claims are paid in
full.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
following: business operations.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 14, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/yxpmjz4y from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

               About McClain Trucking LLC

McClain Trucking LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. La. Case No. 19-10589) on May 17,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of
between $100,001 and $500,000 and liabilities of the same range.
Pamela Magee LLC is the Debtor's legal counsel.


MIAH INVESTMENTS: Sept. 24 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------------
The hearing to consider the approval of the disclosure statement
explaining the Chapter 11 Plan of Miah Investment, LLC, will be
held at the United States Courthouse, Bob Casey Federal Building,
515 Rusk Ave., Houston, Texas, 77002 on September 24, 2019, at 9:00
o’clock a.m..

September 19, 2019 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the disclosure statement.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated July 31, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y4g4ad55 from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                  About Miah Investment

Miah Investments is a privately-held company in Houston, Texas,
engaged in activities related to real estate.  

It previously filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Case No. 13-34109) on July 9, 2013.

Miah Investment sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 18-36255) on Nov. 5,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of $1
million to $10 million and liabilities of less than $1 million.
The case is assigned to Judge Eduardo V. Rodriguez.  Hoff Law
Offices, P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.


MIDCONTINENT COMMUNICATIONS: S&P Cuts Rating on $300MM Loan to BB
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issue-level rating on Midcontinent
Communications' $300 million revolver due 2024 to 'BB' from 'BB+'
and removed the ratings from CreditWatch, where the rating agency
placed it with negative implications on July 17, 2019, as expected,
following the completion of a previously announced refinancing. The
lower rating reflects reduced recovery prospects in a simulated
default because there are now more secured claims, as a new $685
million term loan replaced the old $385 million term loan. As a
result, S&P has revised the recovery rating to '2' from '1',
reflecting its expectation of substantial (70%-90%; rounded
estimate: 75%) recovery in a default scenario. This action brings
issue-level and recovery ratings in line with the new secured debt
that was recently issued.

The issuer credit rating on Midcontinent remains 'BB-', with a
stable outlook.



MILLENNIUM PARK: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR; Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B-' issuer credit rating on
U.S.-based Millennium Park Intermediate LLC (doing business as
[dba] Numerator) and its 'B-' issue-level rating on its first-lien
term revolving credit facility and term-loan facility. The '3'
recovery rating on the debt is unchanged.

Millennium Park's cash flow generation continues to be within S&P's
expectations, but adjusted leverage remains elevated at above 10x
as of June 30, 2019. S&P expects the company to generate about $2
million-$4 million of free operating cash flow in 2019, driven
largely by improvement in working capital management, lower
operating expenses as a result of the company's cost management
initiatives, and new bookings of its Path (formerly Market Track)
and Purchase (formerly InfoScout) products. S&P also expects
Millennium Park to maintain at least 15% cushion of compliance with
its springing covenants (tested if at least 35% of its $30 million
revolver is drawn). As of June 30, 2019, the company had $10.4
million drawn on its revolver, which is just below the 35% that
would have required a quarterly covenant test. The covenant cushion
of compliance as of June 30, 2019 was just under 40%.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that while leverage
will continue to remain elevated, Millennium Park will generate
free operating cash flow of at least $2 million-$4 million to cover
its first-lien amortization over the next 12 months.

"We could lower the rating if the company were unable to maintain
free operating cash flow generation of at least $3 million to cover
its fixed charges on a sustained basis. This would suggest an
increased vulnerability to non-payment and an unsustainable capital
structure," S&P said, adding that it could also lower the rating if
the covenant cushion of compliance fell below 15% on a sustained
basis such that access to the revolving facility were limited,
thereby constraining liquidity.

"We view an upgrade as less likely over the next 12 months, given
the company's small scale of operations and high leverage. We could
raise the rating if Millennium Park were able to increase the scale
of its business while reducing leverage to the low 5x area on a
sustained basis," S&P said. Given the financial sponsor ownership
structure, any upgrade scenario would require a firm commitment to
a less aggressive financial policy, according to the rating agency.


MILLERS LANE: Hires Hublar Enterprises as Business Consultant
-------------------------------------------------------------
Millers Lane Center, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Kentucky to employ Hublar
Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Comprehensive Business Solutions, as
business consultant to the Debtor.

Millers Lane requires Hublar Enterprises to:

   a. assist the Debtor in its continued efforts to restore and
      rebuild the company's business records to convey meaningful
      and accurate information concerning the Debtor's
      operations;

   b. advise the Debtor in its preparation of monthly operating
      reports and other necessary compliance activities; and

   c. support the Debtor's assessment of its business
      opportunities and development of a chapter 11 plan or other
      strategies to maximize the value of the bankruptcy estate.

Hublar Enterprises will be paid $7,500 per month.

Hublar Enterprises will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Michael Hublar, partner of Hublar Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a
Comprehensive Business Solutions, assured the Court that the firm
is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest
adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Hublar Enterprises can be reached at:

     Michael Hublar
     HUBLAR ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A
     COMPREHENSIVE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
     12 N. Hill Drive
     Floyds Knobs, IN
     Tel: (812) 944-4062

                   About Millers Lane Center

Millers Lane Center LLC is a privately held company in the general
rental centers industry. Millers Lane sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No.
19-32095) on July 2, 2019. In the petition signed by its managing
member, Mark S. Brewer, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities
of less than $10 million. Kaplan Johnson Abate & Bird LLP is the
Debtor's counsel.



MONTESQUIEU INC: Unsecureds to Recoup 3% Under Chapter 11 Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Montesquieu, Inc., WG Best Weinkellerei, Inc. dba Montesquieu
Winery, and Montesquieu Corp., propose a joint plan of
reorganization and accompanying disclosure statement proposing an
estimated 3% recovery for general unsecured creditors.

Class 3 consists of General Unsecured Claims against the Debtors,
other than the Class 4 General Unsecured Claims (Spirit of the East
Debt).  Each Holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim shall be
paid its pro rata share of assets available for distribution for
Holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims. Unless otherwise
provided by an Order of the Bankruptcy Court, no fees or penalties
of any kind shall be paid to the holders of Allowed General
Unsecured Claims. This class is impaired.

The Debtors have scheduled claims in this Class in the amount of
$2,114,002.68.  In addition, creditors have filed proofs of claim
asserting general unsecured claims in the amount of $983,782.75,
some of which may be disputed by the Debtor. Anticipated Recovery
for this Class is 3%.

Class 4 consists of all General Unsecured Claims asserted by United
against the Debtors. The distributions on account of the Allowed
General Unsecured Claim (Spirit of the East Debt) shall be made in
accordance with the Agreement and section 2.9 of this Plan. This
class is impaired.

The Debtors have scheduled claims in this Class in the amount of
$1,193,245.76. In addition, the creditor in this class filed a
proof of claim in the amount of $1,264,913.46.
Anticipated recovery for this Class is 26-36%.

Class 5 consists of Intercompany Claims against the Debtors.
Holders of Intercompany Claims against the Debtors shall receive no
distribution on account of such Intercompany Claim. This class is
impaired.

Class 6 consists of Equity Interests in the Debtors. Equity
Interests shall be cancelled under the Plan. This class is
impaired.

All consideration necessary to make all monetary payments in
accordance with this Plan shall be obtained from (i) the Cash and
cash equivalents of the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as
applicable; and (ii) the Exit Financing

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 14, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y4dl4uwt from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

A hearing to consider approval of the motion to approve the
Disclosure Statement and confirmation schedule will be held on
August 28, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. ET.

The Plan was filed by Mette H. Kurth, Esq., Thomas M. Horan, Esq.,
and Johnna M. Darby, Esq., at Fox Rothschild LLP, in Wilmington,
Delaware, on behalf of the Debtors.

                   About Montesquieu, Inc.

Montesquieu, Inc., is a wine maker headquartered in San Diego,
California that focuses on producing "first-rate boutique" wines
from family-owned and operated vineyards.  The Company is committed
to producing hand-crafted, limited-production, and exquisite
wines.

Montesquieu, Inc., based in San Diego, CA, and its affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
19-10599) on March 20, 2019.  The Hon. Brendan Linehan Shannon
oversees the case.  

In their petitions, Montesquieu, Inc., estimated assets and
liabilities of $100,000 to $500,000; Montesquieu Corporation's
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million, and estimated
liabilities of $50,000 to $100,000; and WG Best Weinkellerie
estimated assets of $100,000 to $500,000, and estimated liabilities
of $1 million to $10 million.

Mette H. Kurth, Esq., at Fox Rothschild LLP, serves as bankruptcy
counsel.


MOTORS LIQUIDATION: Denial of Gillispie Bid to Pursue Claims Upheld
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Appellant in the case captioned Roger Dean Gillispie, Appellant, v.
Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee for and Administrator of the
Motors Liquidation Company General Unsecured Creditors Trust and
General Motors LLC, Appellees, No. 17 CV 8538-LTS (S.D.N.Y.)
appeals the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered by Judge Glenn, in
In re Motors Liquidation Co., 576 B.R. 761, 765 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
2017) denying Appellant's motion to pursue claims against General
Motors LLC ("New GM") pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983 and Ohio
state law for vicarious liability for the acts of GM employees who,
in concert with government actors, allegedly deprived him of his
civil rights, or, alternatively, to permit Appellant to file a
post-bar-date proof of claim against Motors Liquidation Company
("Old GM"), as represented by Wilmington Trust Company as trustee
and administrator of Motors Liquidation Company General Unsecured
Creditors Trust.

District Judge Laura Taylor Swain has considered carefully the
submissions of all parties and affirms the Bankruptcy Decision.

The Court holds that Appellant's appeal to equitable concerns is
insufficient to support a determination that the bankruptcy court
abused its discretion. Appellant is aggrieved that he is now barred
from seeking recourse against both Old and New GM for their alleged
role in his arrest and subsequent prosecution. Appellant's
predicament is the result of the operation of a bankruptcy system
that both affords opportunities to assert timely claims against
debtors and permits the sale of assets free and clear of such
claims. Appellant was eligible to avail himself of the claim
procedure, but failed to do so in compliance with the law. While
Appellant has thus forfeited his ability to seek redress against
both entities, he is in the same position as any other claimant who
was allegedly harmed by GM's tortious or unlawful conduct, whether
serious or trivial, and did not assert his or her claim in a timely
fashion. The record shows no inequitable treatment that would
render the denial of Appellant's late claim filing application
abusive of the bankruptcy court's discretion.

Accordingly, the Court concludes that the bankruptcy court did not
abuse its discretion in denying Appellant's motion to file a
post-bar-date notice of claim. The Bankruptcy Decision is affirmed
and Appellant's appeal is dismissed.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated March 27,
2019 is available at https://bit.ly/30y1t4L from Leagle.com.

David Benjamin Owens , Lovegrove & Smith, P.C., Hauppauge, NY, for
Plaintiff.

Andrew Baker Bloomer , Pro Hac Vice, Richard Cartier Godfrey ,
Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL, Arthur Jay Steinberg , Scott Ian
Davidson , King & Spalding LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant General
Motors LLC.

Clay J. Pierce , Marsha Jessica Indych , Drinker Biddle & Reath,
LLP, New York, NY, Kristin Kendra Going , Drinker Biddle & Reath
LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant Wilmington Trust Company, as
Trust Administrator and Trustee for the Motors Liquidation Company
GUC Trust.

Wilmington Trust Company, pro se.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, pro se.

                    About General Motors

With its global headquarters in Detroit, Michigan, General Motors
-- http://www.gm.com/-- is one of the world's largest automakers,
traces its roots back to 1908.

General Motors Co. was formed to acquire the operations of General
Motors Corp. through a sale under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 363 following Old
GM's bankruptcy filing.  The U.S. government provided financing.
The deal was closed July 10, 2009, and Old GM changed its name to
Motors Liquidation Co.

Old GM -- General Motors Corporation -- filed for Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 09-50026) on June 1,
2009.  The Honorable Robert E. Gerber presides over the Chapter 11
cases.  The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP Jenner &
Block LLP and Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP as counsel; and
Morgan Stanley, Evercore Partners and the Blackstone Group LLP as
financial advisor.  Garden City Group is the claims and notice
agent of the Debtors.

The U.S. Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors and a separate Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Holding Asbestos-Related Claims.  Lawyers at Kramer Levin Naftalis
& Frankel LLP served as bankruptcy counsel to the Creditors
Committee.  Attorneys at Butzel Long served as counsel on supplier
contract matters.  FTI Consulting Inc. served as financial advisors
to the Creditors Committee.  Elihu Inselbuch, Esq., at Caplin &
Drysdale, Chartered, represented the Asbestos Committee.  Legal
Analysis Systems, Inc., served as asbestos valuation analyst.

The Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Debtors'
Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan on March 29, 2011.  The Plan
was declared effect on March 31, 2011.

On Dec. 15, 2011, Motors Liquidation was dissolved.  On the
Dissolution Date, pursuant to the Plan and the Motors Liquidation
Company GUC Trust Agreement, dated March 30, 2011, between the
parties thereto, the trust administrator and trustee -- GUC Trust
Administrator -- of the Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust,
assumed responsibility for the affairs of and certain claims
against MLC and its debtor subsidiaries that were not concluded
prior to the Dissolution Date.


NORPAC FOODS: Case Summary & 24 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: NORPAC Foods, Inc.
                d/b/a Stayton Canning Company
                d/b/a North Pacific Canners & Packers
                f/d/b/a NORPAC Food Sales
                d/b/a NORPAC's Oregon Agricultural Center
                f/d/b/a NORPAC Services
                3225 25th St. SE
                Salem, OR 97309

Business Description: Founded in 1924 and headquartered in Salem,
                      Oregon, NORPAC (www.norpac.com), a farmer-
                      owned cooperative, along with its wholly-
                      owned subsidiaries Hermiston Foods and
                      Quincy Foods, is an independent, standalone
                      processor of organic and conventional frozen
                      vegetables and fruits in the Pacific
                      Northwest.  NORPAC is a cooperative owned by
                      more than 140 members.  Quincy and Hermiston
                      are single-member limited liability
                      companies whose sole member is NORPAC.  The
                      Debtors own and operate raw processing
                      plants in Brooks, Oregon, and Stayton,
                      Oregon, a packaging plant in Salem, Oregon,
                      and a raw processing, packaging, and
                      roasting facility in Quincy, Washington.
                      The Debtors have more than 1,125 full-time
                      employees along with up to 1,100 seasonal
                      employees.  The Debtors have a diverse
                      supplier base built on an extensive network
                      of more than 220 contract growers made up of
                      family-owned farms (145 farms in Oregon and
                      75 farms in Washington) spanning more than
                      40,000 acres.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 22, 2019

Three affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

      Debtor                                      Case No.
      ------                                      --------
      NORPAC Foods, Inc. (Lead Case)              19-32584
      Hermiston Foods, LLC                        19-33102
      Quincy Foods, LLC                           19-33103

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Oregon (Portland)

Judge: Hon. Peter C. McKittrick

Debtors' Counsel: Albert N. Kennedy, Esq.
                  TONKON TORP LLP
                  888 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1600
                  Portland, OR 97204-2099
                  Tel: 503.802.2013
                  Fax: 503.972.3713
                  E-Mail: albert.kennedy@tonkon.com

                    - and -

                  Timothy J. Conway, Esq.
                  TONKON TORP LLP
                  888 SW 5th Ave #1600
                  Portland, OR 97204
                  Tel: (503) 802-2027
                  Fax: (503) 972-3727
                  E-Mail: tim.conway@tonkon.com

                    - and -

                  Michael W. Fletcher, Esq.
                  TONKON TORP LLP
                  888 SW 5th Ave #1600
                  Portland, OR 97204
                  Tel: (503) 802-2169
                  Fax: (503) 972-3867
                  E-Mail: michael.fletcher@tonkon.com

                     - and -

                  Ava L. Schoen, Esq.
                  TONKON TORP LLP
                  888 SW 5th Ave #1600
                  Portland, OR 97204
                  Tel: (503) 802-2143
                  Fax: (503) 972-3843
                  E-Mail: ava.schoen@tonkon.com

Debtors'
Restructuring
Advisor:          SIERRACONSTELLATION PARTNERS Parters LLC

Debtors'
Noticing
Agent:            KURTZMAN CARSON CONSULTANTS LLC
                  https://www.kccllc.net/norpacfoods

NORPAC Foods'
Estimated Assets: $100 million to $500 million

NORPAC Foods'
Estimated Liabilities: $100 million to $500 million

Hermiston Foods'
Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Hermiston Foods'
Estimated Liabilities: $100 million to $500 million

Quincy Foods'
Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Quincy Foods'
Estimated Liabilities: $100 million to $500 million

The petitions were signed by Shawn Campbell, president.

Full-text copies of the petitions are available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/orb19-62584.pdf
            http://bankrupt.com/misc/orb19-33102.pdf
            http://bankrupt.com/misc/orb19-33103.pdf

A. List of NORPAC Foods' 24 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
1. Henningsen Cold Storage Co      Goods/Services      $1,262,557
POB 35146 #40032                      Provided
Seattle WA 98124-2146
Eric Mauss
Tel: 503-531-5400
Email: eric.mauss@henningsen.com

2. Fessler Farms Inc.              Goods/Services       $1,096,499
12096                                 Provided
Monitor-Mckee Rd
Woodburn OR 97071
Robert Fessler
Tel: 503-559-1470
Email: bobf@woodburnnursery.com

3. Ampac Flexibles                 Goods/Services       $1,082,078
25366 Network Pl                      Provided
Chicago IL
60673-1253
Chuck Koth
Tel: 513-551-1268
Email: Charles.Koth@proampac.com

4. AG Reserves dba AgriNorthwest   Goods/Services         $916,250
POB 2308                              Provided
Pasco WA 99302
Tel: 541-945-1811
Email: mmillard@agrinw.com

5. J&M Farming                     Goods/Services         $802,573
27471 Mccarty                         Provided
Ranch Lane
Echo OR 97826
Dan McCarty
Tel: 541-376-8157
Email: danmccarty.dm@gmail.com

6. Terminal Freezers LLC           Goods/Services         $579,308
POB 101389                            Provided
Pasadena CA
91189-1389
Cris McMahon
Tel: 402-891-2549
Email: cmcmahon@lineagelogistics.com

7. VLM Foods USA Ltd               Goods/Services         $547,010
C/O KBC Bank Lock                     Provided
Box #160
1177 Avenue of the
Americas ICM Dept
New York NY 10036
Dianne Beaudry
Tel: 514-426-4100
Email: dianne@ardovlm.com

8. Marbran USA LC                  Goods/Services         $518,600
POB 202473                            Provided
Dallas TX
75320-2473
Fernanda Guajardo
Tel: 956-630-2941
Email: fguajardo@marbran.com

9. KYWA International Group LLC    Goods/Services         $404,854
5335 Meadows Rd                       Provided
Suite 370
Lake Oswego OR 97035
Jordan Wick
Tel: 5036390300
Email: jordan@kywainternational.com

10. Butler Farms LLC               Goods/Services         $404,774
10704 Mill Creek Rd SE                Provided
Aumsville OR 97325
Tim & Joani
Tel: 503-749-1701
Email: butlerfarms@wvi.com

11. Martin Bros                   Trade Liability         $400,141
POB 69
Cedar Falls IA 50613
Natalea Koehn
Tel: 319-273-9782
Email: nkoehn@martinbros.com

12. Keudell Farms Inc.             Goods/Services         $392,543
12444 West Stayton                   Provided
Rd SE
Aumsville OR 97325
Scott Nienke
Tel: 503-507-9567
Email: kfi@wvi.com

13. Greg & Stan Herr               Goods/Services         $381,818
9631 Selah Springs                    Provided
Rd NE
Silverton 97381
Stan Herr
Tel: 503-510-7090
Email: stan9631@aol.com

14. Panda Express                  Trade Liability        $351,263
1683 Walnut Grove Avenue
Rosemead CA 91770
Toby Selogdji
Tel: 626-372-8433
Email: Toby-selogdji@pandarg.com

15. Expor-San Antonio               Goods/Services        $330,858
PMB 550                                Provided
10800 Alpharetta
Hwy Suite 208
Roswell
30076-1474
Rosi Alequin
Tel: 770-993-0030
Email: RosiA@rfsltd.com

16. Haener Living Trust             Goods/Services        $320,337
11644 Ehlen Rd                         Provided
Aurora OR 97002
Del Haener
Tel: 503-559-1451
Email: delhaener@gmail.com

17. Obersinner Farms Inc.           Goods/Services        $306,881
7886 North Howell                      Provided
Rd NE
Silverton OR 97381
David
Tel: 503-873-4004
Email: marge@obersinnernursery.com

18. Supervalu Urbana                Trade Liability       $302,490
POB 990
Minneapolis MN 55440
Ashley Eland-Smithburg
Tel: 952-932-1987
Email: ashley.e.eland-smithburg@supervalu.com

19. Winco Foods                     Trade Liability       $301,004
POB 52
Boise ID 95358
Susan Barry
Tel: 208-672-2471
Email: Susan.Barry@wincofoods.com

20. Unipro                          Trade Liability       $297,763
POB 405762
Atlanta GA
30384-5762
Beverly DeShon
Tel: 770-799-7408
Email: deshon@unipro.com

21. Teamsters Local 760                  Union      Unknown but in
1211 W Lincoln Ave                                       excess of
Yakima WA 98902                                           $250,000
Leonard Crouch
Tel: 509-452-7194
Email: leonard@teamsters760.org

22. Cannery Local 670                    Union         Unknown but
POB 3048                                              in excess of
Salem OR 97302                                            $250,000
Michael Beranbaum
Tel: 503-378-1444
Email: mberanbaum@teamster670.org

23. Western Conference              Health/Welfare     Unknown but
of Teamsters                        trust, pension    in excess of
Pension Trust Fund                      trust             $250,000
POB 34080
Seattle WA 98124
Tel: 206-329-4900

24. Oregon Processors               Health/Welfare     Unknown but
Employees Trust                     trust, pension    in excess of
Unit 33                                 trust             $250,000
c/o US Bank POB 4500
Portland OR 97208
William C Earhart Company, Inc.
Tel: 1-800-547-1314
Email: info@wcearhart.com

B. List of Hermiston Foods' Eight Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
1. Heller & Sons                    Goods/Services         $2,592
Distributing Inc                       Provided
POB 66
Hermiston, OR 97838
Mike Heller
Tel: 541-567-6582
Email: hellers@eotnet.net

2. IJCS LLC                          Goods/Services         $1,244
POB 188                                 Provided
Irrigon, OR 97844
Tel: 541-701-1420

3. Aramark                        Money Transferrable        $347
POB 101179                           to Aramark
Pasadena, CA
91189-0005
Tel: 800-272-6275

4. City of Hermiston              Government Agency/         $314
180 NE 2nd St                         Utilities
Hermiston, OR
97838-1860
Tel: 541-567-5521
Email: city@hermiston.or.us

5. Coleman Oil                      Goods/Services            $127
POB 1308                               Provided
Lewiston, ID 83501
Bob Coleman
Tel: 888-799-2000
Email: bob@colemanoil.com

6. Pea Ridge Embroidery &             Goods/Services          $120
Signs                                   Provided
80874 N Highway 395
Hermiston, OR 97838
Tel: 541-567-0968
Email: pearidge00@gmail.com

7. Hermiston Quicky Lube            Goods/Services             $57
POB 928                                Provided
Hermiston, OR 97838
Tel: 541-564-9297

8. Smitty's Ace Hardware              Goods/Services            $9
1845 N 1st Street                       Provided
Hermiston, OR 97838
Tel: 541-567-6816
Email: manager@smittysace.com

C. List of Quincy Foods' 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
1. Packaging Corporation of        Goods/Services      $1,827,039
America                               Provided
POB 51584
Los Angeles, CA
90051-5884
Stacy Hyde
Tel: 503-315-2363
Email: StacyHyde@packagingcorp.com

2. Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc.   Goods/Services        $634,310
POB 935619                            Provided
Atlanta, GA
31193-5619
Doug Barnes
Tel: 805-647-1572
Email: doug.barnes@bayer.com

3. Syngenta Seeds, Inc.            Goods/Services        $551,723
15390 Collections Ctr Dr              Provided
Chicago, IL
60693-0153
Kevin Moe
Tel: 208-327-7265
Email: kevin.moe@syngenta.com

4. Klaustermeyer Farms Inc.        Goods/Services        $533,100
4900 Hollingsworth Road               Provided
Basin City, WA 99343
Jim Klaustermeyer
Tel: 509-269-4294
Email: jimjr@klaustermeyerfarms.com

5. Williamson Farm Inc.            Goods/Services        $444,278
3505 Adams Rd S                       Provided
Quincy, WA 98848
Eric Williamson
Tel: 509-293-9229
Email: ericsharma@yahoo.com

6. L2 Inc.                         Goods/Services        $423,653
509 Rd K SW                           Provided
Quincy, WA 98848
Levi Lange
Tel: 509-398-0416
Email: levi@smwireless.net

7. Chuck Williamson                Goods/Services        $254,892
5 Rd K NW                             Provided
Quincy, WA 98848
Tel: 509-398-1101
Email: kwilliamson@yahoo.com

8. QCS Purchasing LLC              Goods/Services        $237,718
Dept #10299                           Provided
POB 87618
Chicago, IL
60680-0618
HEather Thompson
Tel: 630-717-1126
Email: martha@qcspurchasing.com
  
9. Crites Seed Inc.                Goods/Services        $235,960
212 W 8th St                          Provided
POB 8912
Moscow, ID
83843-1412
Andy Johnson
Tel: 208-882-5519
Email: andy@critesseed.com

10. Alan Williamson                Goods/Services        $214,059
4524 Adams Rd S                       Provided
Quincy, WA 98848
Tel: 509-237-3818
Email: ERICSHARMA@YAHOO.COM

11. H Lee Farms Inc.               Goods/Services        $211,811
11915 Rd M SW                        Provided
Royal City, WA
99357
Hank Lee
Tel: 509-989-2735
Email: hanklee67@me.com

12. Reynolds Agribusiness LLC      Goods/Services        $198,920
POB L                                Provided
Moses Lake, WA 98837
Brett Reynolds
Tel: 509-760-2304
Email: bwreynolds@me.com

13. Diamond M Inc.                 Goods/Services        $194,523
401 19th St NE #2                    Provided
East Wenatchee, WA 98802
Doug Moore
Tel: 509-750-1752
Email: douglasmoore1@mac.com

14. J&C Daughters' Trust           Goods/Services         $190,817
8002 Adamds Rd S                      Provided
Royal City, WA 99357
Derek Allred
Tel: 509-760-4329
Email: derekfallred@yahoo.com

15. Skagit Transportation Inc.     Goods/Services        $186,137
POB 400                               Provided
Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Miguel Guerrero
Tel: 509-787-5201 ext 322
Email: MiguelG@skagittrans.com

16. Bronco Farm Supply             Goods/Services        $174,962
1302 W First Ave                      Provided
Ritzville, WA 99169
Keri Gingrich
Tel: 509-659-1532
Email: kgingrich@connelloil.com

17. Anzuk Farms                    Goods/Services        $159,721
POB 322                               Provided
Ephrata, WA 98823
Erick Burck
Tel: 509-398-5777
Email: eric_burck@hotmail.com

18. Kelsey Sidwell                 Goods/Services        $149,858
5 Rd K NW                             Provided
Quincy, WA 98848
Tel: 509-398-3309
Email: kwilliamson92@yahoo.com

19. Deaguiar Farms                 Goods/Services        $144,533
1263 Rd S NW                          Provided
Quincy, WA 98848
Joe Deaguiar
Tel: 509-785-4680
Email: Deaguiarfarm@yahoo.com

20. ERW Farms Inc.                 Goods/Services        $142,009
3505 Adams Rd S                       Provided
Quincy, WA 98848
Eric Williamson
Tel: 509-237-3815
Email: ericsharma@yahoo.com


NORPAC FOODS: In Chapter 11 to Sell to Oregon Potato for $149.5MM
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NORPAC Foods Inc. and affiliates Hermiston Foods, LLC, filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code with a deal to sell most of their assets to Oregon Potato
Company ("OPC") for $149.5 million, absent higher and better
offers.  

Pursuant to the parties' assets purchase agreement, the Debtors
agreed to sell substantially all of their assets, with the
exception of the processing plant in Stayton, their investment in
CoBank, certain life insurance policies and other nominal assets.
The purchase price is $149.5 million, plus an agreed value of
accounts receivable, plus an adjustment for the increase in the
value of Debtors' inventory, less the amount due to growers at the
closing of the 2019 crop.  OPC will assume and pay all amounts due
to growers for the 2019 crop.  

The Debtors believe the sale will generate funds sufficient to pay
all secured and priority claims and leave sufficient funds for a
meaningful distribution to unsecured creditors.

The APA required that the Debtors initiate a voluntary case under
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code and close the
transaction contemplated by the APA pursuant to an order of the
United States Bankruptcy Court authorizing the sale pursuant to 11
U.S.C. Sec. 363(b) and related provisions.

On or before Aug. 27, 2019, the Debtors will file a motion for
authority to sell substantially all of Debtors' assets free and
clear of all interests and establishing bidding and auction
procedures.

In May of 2018, NORPAC engaged the investment banking firm of D.A.
Davidson & Co. to render financial advisory and investment banking
services in connection with NORPAC's financial and strategic
alternatives, including purchase, merger, consolidation,
reorganization, or other transaction.  However, D.A. Davidson was
unable to conclude a transaction and their engagement was
terminated in June of 2019.

With the assistance of SierraConstellation Partners, LLC and after
almost six weeks of negotiation, the Debtors entered into an Asset
Purchase Agreement with OPC.

Founded in 1924 and headquartered in Salem, Oregon, NORPAC (and its
subsidiaries) is the largest processor of frozen vegetables and
fruits in the Pacific Northwest.  NORPAC is a cooperative owned by
over 140 members.  Quincy and Hermiston are single-member limited
liability companies whose sole member is NORPAC.  Debtors own and
operate raw processing plants in Brooks, Oregon, and Stayton,
Oregon, a packaging plant in Salem, Oregon, and a raw processing,
packaging, and roasting facility in Quincy, Washington.  Each of
the plants has associated cold storage facilities.  Debtors also
have a harvesting operation in Hermiston, Oregon.

The Debtors have cultivated a diverse supplier base built on a
network of over 220 contract growers spanning more than 40,000
acres.  The Debtors' growers are made up of family-owned and run
farms focused on providing quality vegetables and fruits.  Debtors
have the ability to process 23 different fruits and vegetables and
have established relationships with a customer base of over 1,250
buyers spanning the retail, food service, club, export, and
industrial markets worldwide.

The Debtors' sales have exceeded $310 million in each of the last
three fiscal years.  The Debtors employ more than 1,125 full-time
employees and over 1,100 seasonal employees during the harvest and
processing season.  

The Debtors are the largest unionized agricultural employer in
Oregon, with approximately 2,000 union members.  NORPAC has
contracts with Teamsters Local 324, Teamsters Local 670, Teamsters
Local 760, and the International Union of Operating Engineers Local
701.

The Debtors sponsor a single-employer defined benefit plan and
participate in three multi-employer pension plans, including the
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan, the Oregon Processors
Seasonal Employees Pension Plan, and the Central Pension Fund of
the International Union of Operating Engineers.  Outside
consultants have estimated the withdrawal liabilities for the three
multi-employer pension plans to total more than $5 million.  The
consultants estimate that the deficit of the single-employer
defined benefit plan could exceed $20 million.

                         DIP Financing

The Debtors are co-borrowers under a Credit Agreement dated Nov.
15, 2017 with CoBank, ACB, in its capacity as administrative agent
for the Lenders as defined in the Credit Agreement.  The Debtors'
obligations to CoBank under the Credit Agreement total $124 million
and are secured by all or substantially all assets and property of
each of the Debtors.  The obligations under the Credit Agreement
include a revolving credit facility with an aggregate principal
credit limit of $87.5 million.  The Debtors are in default in the
performance of their obligations under the Credit Agreement and
Debtors have been operating for several months under a series of
forbearance agreements.

Because of the seasonality of their business, the Debtors have an
immediate need for up to $15 million in additional credit
accommodations from CoBank in order to maintain their operations as
a going concern, close the transaction contemplated by the APA, and
maximize the value of their assets for the benefit of their estates
and all creditors.  Without such additional funds, the Debtors will
not be able to continue the operation of their business, pay their
employees, and preserve the value of their assets.

CoBank has offered a DIP Facility as set forth in the 14th
Amendment to Credit Agreement.  No lender, including OPC, is
willing to provide a DIP Facility absent a first priority lien on
assets that would prime CoBank's security interests and liens.
CoBank is unwilling to allow Debtors to grant such a priming lien
to any alternative lender under any terms.

The CoBank DIP Facility will be comprised of a committed, secured
revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount not to
exceed $102.5 million -- Aggregate Revolving Credit Commitment
Amount -- which is $15 million higher than the $87.5 million
Aggregate Revolving Credit Commitment Amount in effect immediately
prior to the Petition Date -- Prepetition Revolving Commitment
Level.

                        About NORPAC Foods

Founded in 1924 and headquartered in Salem, Oregon, NORPAC Foods
Inc. (and its subsidiaries) is the largest processor of frozen
vegetables and fruits in the Pacific Northwest.  NORPAC is a
cooperative owned by over 140 members.  Quincy Foods, LLC, and
Hermiston Foods, LLC, are single-member limited liability companies
whose sole member is NORPAC.

NORPAC Foods and subsidiaries Hermiston Foods and Quincy Foods
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Ore. Lead Case No.
19-32584) on Aug. 22, 2019 in Portland, Oregon.

NORPAC estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets and
liabilities.

The Hon. Peter C. McKittrick is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped TONKON TORP LLP as counsel; SIERRACONSTELLATION
PARTNERS LLC as restructuring advisor; and KURTZMAN CARSON
CONSULTANTS LLC as claims agent.


OUTFRONT MEDIA: Moody's Affirms Ba3 CFR, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed OUTFRONT Media Inc.'s Ba3
corporate family rating. The Ba1 senior secured debt and B1 senior
unsecured notes ratings were also affirmed. The outlook remains
stable.

OUTFRONT has demonstrated very strong growth over the past several
quarters which has reduced Moody's pro forma leverage level to 5x
as of Q2 2019. Moody's expects continued growth in revenue and
EBITDA although at a slower rate given more challenging comparable
results in the 2nd half of 2019. While debt levels are expected to
increase modestly going forward, Moody's projects EBITDA growth
will offset the impact on the company's leverage level. Free cash
flow continued to be negative during the LTM period ending Q2 2019
after $206 million in dividends and $89 million in prepaid MTA
equipment deployment costs, but Moody's expects FCF will be
approximately breakeven at year end 2019.

Affirmations:

Issuer: OUTFRONT Media Inc.

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba3

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba3-PD

Issuer: OUTFRONT Media Capital LLC

  Senior Secured Term Loan B due 2024, Affirmed Ba1 (LGD2)

  Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility due 2022, Affirmed
  Ba1 (LGD2)

  Gtd Senior Unsecured Notes, Affirmed B1 (LGD5)

Unchanged:

Issuer: OUTFRONT Media Inc.

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, SGL-2

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: OUTFRONT Media Inc.

  Outlook, Remains Stable

Issuer: OUTFRONT Media Capital LLC

  Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

OUTFRONT's Ba3 CFR reflects the market position as one of the
largest outdoor advertising companies in the US with positions in
all the top 25 markets and approximately 140 markets in the US and
Canada. The continued conversion of traditional static billboards
and transit displays to digital is expected to support revenue and
EBITDA growth. The outdoor advertising industry benefits from
restrictions on the supply of billboards which help support
advertising rates and high asset valuations. Moody's pro forma
leverage as of Q2 2019 was 5x (excluding Moody's standard lease
adjustments) and has improved despite higher amounts of debt.
EBITDA margins are good, but below the industry average of its US
competitors at approximately 28% as calculated by Moody's due to
its lower margin transit business. OUTFRONT operates as a REIT
which has led to large distributions to shareholders and limited
the company's ability to generate FCF.

The outdoor industry remains vulnerable to consumer ad spending and
ad contract periods are generally shorter than they were
historically. OUTFRONT also derives significant revenue from
national advertisers and has business concentration in both New
York City and Los Angeles which can cause increased volatility.
OUTFRONT's renewed contract with the New York Metropolitan Transit
Authority (MTA) will lead OUTFRONT to deploy over 50,000 digital
transit displays (including platform, subway, and railcar displays)
over the next several years. The rollout of digital transit
displays has expanded the number of new advertising relationships
and led to accelerated levels of growth. As the number of digital
transit displays grows, the value OUTFRONT offers to advertisers is
projected to continue to increase. OUTFRONT is anticipated to
continuously evaluate acquisitions that could be funded with cash,
debt, or equity.

Moody's expects OUTFRONT to maintain good liquidity as reflected by
its SGL-2 speculative grade liquidity rating. Liquidity is
supported by the company's $430 million revolver due March 2022
with no borrowings ($66 million of LCs outstanding). Cash on the
balance sheet was $475 million as of Q2 2019, but is expected to
decrease to approximately $50 million following the repayment of
$550 million of senior unsecured notes due 2022 in Q3 2019. The
outstanding balance on the recently upsized $125 million Accounts
Receivable Facility and upsized $90 million Repurchase Facility are
expected to increase following the note repayment and Moody's
expects modest draws on the revolver as the company builds out the
MTA digital transit platform. There is an additional $150 million
of L/C facilities which had $143 million outstanding as of Q2 2019.
OUTFRONT has good cash flow from operations prior to shareholder
distributions, but FCF was negative in 2017, 2018 and LTM Q2 2019
after capex and dividends. FCF is expected to improve to
approximately breakeven by year end 2019.

OUTFRONT's liquidity position has benefited from the company's
continued sale of shares under its $300 million At-the-Market
equity (ATM) offering program ($35 million issued in Q2 2019) that
was put in place in November 2017. The ATM program could be used to
help fund modest acquisitions or negative FCF. The term loan is
covenant lite, but the revolver is subject to a maximum
consolidated net secured leverage ratio when drawn of 4x compared
to a ratio of 1x as of Q2 2019. Moody's anticipates OUTFRONT will
maintain a significant cushion of compliance. OUTFRONT also has the
ability to issue incremental term loans in the amount of the
greater of $400 million or an unlimited amount subject to an
incurrence test of 6x the consolidated total leverage ratio
compared to a ratio of 5.5x as of Q2 2019 which is expected to
improve to approximately 4.5x following the repayment of the 2022
senior unsecured notes in Q3 2019.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation of continued
revenue growth, although the pace of growth is expected to slow as
OUTFRONT anniversaries strong periods of growth in the 2nd half of
2019. Debt levels are expected to increase modestly, but EBITDA
growth is expected to offset the impact on leverage so that
leverage levels are unchanged or slightly improved over the next
year.

An upgrade could occur if leverage decreased below 3.5x (excluding
Moody's standard adjustments) and OUTFRONT would need to
demonstrate both the desire and ability to sustain leverage below
that level while maintaining a good liquidity position. Positive
organic revenue growth would also be required, in addition to free
cash flow as a percentage of debt above 10%.

The ratings could face downward pressure if leverage was expected
to be maintained above 5x (excluding Moody's standard adjustments).
A deterioration in its liquidity position or continued negative
free cash flow after dividends could also trigger a downgrade.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Media Industry
published in June 2017.

OUTFRONT Media Inc. is one of the leading outdoor advertising
companies with operations primarily in the US in addition to
Canada. OUTFRONT was previously an operating subsidiary of CBS
Corporation and in July 2014 began operating as a REIT. In October
2014, OUTFRONT completed the acquisition of certain outdoor assets
from Van Wagner Communications, LLC for $690 million. In April
2016, the company sold its Latin America outdoor assets to JCDecaux
S.A. for approximately $82 million in cash. In June 2017, OUTFRONT
acquired the equity interests of certain subsidiaries of All Vision
LLC to expand its outdoor advertising assets in Canada for $94
million of cash and equity. Reported revenues were approximately
$1.7 billion on an LTM basis as of Q2 2019.


O’LINN SECURITY: Granted Interim Approval to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California
authorized O'Linn Security Incorporated, on an interim basis, to
use cash collateral of up to $290,000 from Aug. 13, 2019 through
Sept. 14, 2019, pursuant to the budget.

The Debtor may spend up to 15% over the budgeted amounts in any one
category but not more than $290,000 in the aggregate.  The Debtor
may rollover any unused expense allowance from week to week by
category but only up to $290,000.

To the extent that gross revenue exceeds projected gross revenue,
the Debtor may apply up to 75% of the excess (beyond the projected
gross revenue) to the cost of goods sold and to advertising or
marketing.

The Debtor will pay Pacific Premier Bank $1,624 monthly.  Pacific
Premier, a secured creditor of the Debtor, is granted replacement
lien in all postpetition assets of the Debtor, except avoidance
power actions and recoveries.

The Court will consider the Debtor's continued use of cash
collateral at 11 a.m. on Sept. 12, 2019.

A copy of the Court Order is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/OLinn_Security_Cash_Ord.pdf

O'Linn Security Incorporated sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-17085) on Aug. 13, 2019, estimating both
assets and liabilities of less than $1 million.  Steven R. Fox,
Esq., and W. Sloan Youkstetter, Esq., at THE FOX LAW CORPORATION,
INC., serve as the Debtor's counsel.


PALM BEACH GOLF: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Three affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                      Case No.
     ------                                      --------
     Palm Beach Golf Center, Inc.                19-21268
     7700 North Military Trail
     Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

     Palm Beach Golf Center - Boca, Inc.         19-21269
     3698 North Federal Highway
     Boca Raton, FL 33431

     Waltrav, LLC                                19-21271
     7700 North Military Trail
     Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

Business Description: Founded in 1988, Palm Beach Golf Center --
                      https://www.palmbeachgolfcenter.com/ --
                      is a seller golf equipment and supplies.
                      The Company provides golf shoes, golf balls,

                      and apparel for men and women.  It also
                      offers club fitting, club repair, golf
                      club pureing, equipment rentals, and trade
                      ins.  The Company sells brands like Addias,
                      Under Armour, Ralph Lauren, and Nike.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 22, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach)

Judge: Hon. Erik P. Kimball

Debtors' Counsel: Craig I. Kelley, Esq.
                  KELLEY, FULTON & KAPLAN, P.L.
                  1665 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd #1000
                  West Palm Beach, FL 33401
                  Tel: 561-491-1200
                  E-mail: craig@kelleylawoffice.com
                          dana@kelleylawoffice.com

Palm Beach Golf Center, Inc.'s
Total Assets: $58,801

Palm Beach Golf Center, Inc.'s
Total Liabilities: $1,948,566

Palm Beach Golf Center - Boca's
Total Assets: $18,990

Palm Beach Golf Center - Boca's
Total Liabilities: $1,942,402

Waltrav, LLC's
Total Assets: $0

Waltrav, LLC's
Total Liabilities: $0

The petitions were signed by Mark Travaglini, vice president.

A full-text copy of Palm Beach Golf Center, Inc.'s petition
containing, among other items, a list of the Debtor's 20 largest
unsecured creditors is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-21268.pdf

A full-text copy of Palm Beach Golf Center - Boca's petition
containing, among other items, a list of the Debtor's 20 largest
unsecured creditors is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-21269.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's two unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-21271.pdf


PEABODY ENERGY: Court Flips Order Granting Bid for Atty's Fees
--------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Ronnie L. White reverses the Order and Judgment
Granting Reorganized Debtors' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and
Expenses and remands the case captioned PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION,
et al., Reorganized Debtors, DMS CONTRACTING, INC.,
Creditor-Appellant, v. PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION, et al.,
Reorganized Debtors-Appellees, Case Nos. 16-42529-399, 4:18CV306
RLW (E.D. Mo.) to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Missouri.

Creditor-Appellant DMS raised five points on appeal: 1) the
bankruptcy court erred in finding Peabody's motion for fees timely
and unbarred despite Peabody's failure to comply with the 14-day
requirement of Fed. R. Civ. P. 54; 2) the bankruptcy court erred in
finding Peabody's motion for fees timely and unbarred under
Missouri state law despite Peabody's failure to plead or request
fees during the DMS claim proceedings; 3) the bankruptcy court
erred in determining that Peabody was not required to assume or
reject the executory contract to preserve recovery of a benefit
thereunder; 4) the bankruptcy court erred in determining that the
fee provision in the contract was enforceable against DMS
post-confirmation despite its rejection; and 5) the bankruptcy
court abused its discretion in determining that Peabody's fees were
reasonable despite Peabody's failure to itemize the time entries to
reflect work exclusively pertaining to the DMS claim.

The Court holds that the bankruptcy court's legal conclusion that
Peabody is exempt from Rule 54 and the motion for fees was timely
under Missouri substantive law requires a finding that Peabody
sufficiently pleaded entitlement to attorneys' fees in the
underlying bankruptcy proceedings. Here, the bankruptcy court made
no such factual finding in its oral recitation finding that Rule 54
did not apply and adopting the case authority cited by Peabody.
Further, while conceding that Missouri substantive law requires
that attorneys' fees be pleaded specifically, Peabody does not
assert in either the bankruptcy proceedings or this appeal that it
fully complied with Missouri law. Indeed, Peabody cites authority
for the proposition that an award of attorneys' fees must be
vacated where not specifically pleaded.

Applying the proper standard of review in this case,3 the Court is
unable to determine whether the bankruptcy court's finding of
timeliness and award of attorneys' fees was proper under Missouri
law because there is no factual finding as to whether Peabody
pleaded special damages to review for clear error.

Here, the bankruptcy court's findings are silent as to whether
Peabody's specifically requested attorneys' fees in a pleading.
This requirement is set forth in both Missouri substantive law and
in the advisory notes of 54(d)(2)(A), upon which the bankruptcy
court relies. Absent more detailed findings of fact and conclusions
of law, the Court cannot be expected to adequately review the
proceedings.

However, Peabody argues that DMS waived the argument that Peabody
failed to specifically request attorneys' fees in Peabody's
pleadings by not raising it before the bankruptcy court. The record
belies this claim. During the hearing on Peabody's motion for fees,
counsel for DMS argued that Peabody was required to plead and prove
its entitlement to attorneys' fees before the bankruptcy court
entered final judgment, or Peabody was required to request fees
within 14 days under Rule 54. Further, the Court finds that
Peabody's argument that it could not include a request for
attorneys' fees in the contested matter and that 35 days is a
reasonable time, is not properly before this Court. The bankruptcy
court did not address whether Peabody specifically pleaded its
request for attorneys' fees in the bankruptcy proceedings. Whether
Peabody could or could not have sufficiently provided notice to DMS
during the bankruptcy proceedings is a question for the bankruptcy
court to determine on remand.

Thus, the Court holds that the case must be remanded to the
bankruptcy court for development of the court's findings of fact
and conclusions of law in support of the Order and Judgment
awarding attorneys' fees and expenses to Peabody. In light of the
Court's remand, the Court need not address DMS's other arguments
supporting the claim that the bankruptcy court erred in awarding
attorneys' fees and expenses to Peabody. The Court notes, however,
that should the bankruptcy court determine on remand that the
motion for fees is timely and Peabody is entitled to fees, the
bankruptcy court may want to revisit whether the $433,102.78
awarded to Peabody for attorneys' fees and expenses is reasonable
and relates solely to the DMS claim.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum and Order dated March 26, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2Zbms0C from Leagle.com.

DMS Contracting, Inc., Appellant, represented by Steven M. Wallace,
HEPLER BROOM & Amanda Renee McQuaid, HEPLER BROOM.

Peabody Energy Corporation, Appellee, represented by Jaimie L.
Mansfield -- jmansfield@armstrongteasdale.com -- ARMSTRONG TEASDALE
LLP, Matthew Curtis Corcoran --  mcorcorand@jonesday.com -- JONES
DAY, pro hac vice, Steven N. Cousins, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP,
Timothy Daniel Reynolds -- tdreynolds@jonesday.com -- JONES DAY,
pro hac vice & John G. Willard -- jwillard@armstrongteasdale.com --
ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP.

                About Peabody Energy Corporation

Headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, Peabody Energy Corporation --
http://www.PeabodyEnergy.com/-- claims to be the world's largest
private-sector coal company. As of Dec. 31, 2014, the Company owned
interests in 26 active coal mining operations located in the U.S.
and Australia.  The Company has a majority interest in 25 of those
mining operations and a 50% equity interest in the Middlemount Mine
in Australia.  In addition to its mining operations, the Company
markets and brokers coal from other coal producers, both as
principal and agent, and trade coal and freight-related contracts
through trading and business offices in Australia, China, Germany,
India, Indonesia, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the U.S.

At Dec. 31, 2015, the Company had total assets of $11.02 billion
against $10.1 billion in total liabilities, and stockholders'
equity of $919 million.

On April 13, 2016, Peabody Energy Corp. and 153 affiliates filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code. The 154 cases are jointly administered
before the Honorable Judge Barry S. Schermer under (Bankr. E.D. Mo.
Case No. 16-42529).

As of the Petition Date, PEC has approximately $4.3 billion in
outstanding secured debt obligations and $4.5 billion in
outstanding unsecured debt obligations.

The Debtors tapped Jones Day as general counsel; Armstrong,
Teasdale LLP as local counsel; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC and
investment banker Lazard PTY Limited as investment banker; FTI
Consulting, Inc., as financial advisors; and Kurtzman Carson
Consultants, LLC, as claims, ballot and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on April 29, 2016, appointed seven
creditors of Peabody Energy Corp. to serve on the official
committee of unsecured creditors. The Committee retained Morrison &
Foerster LLP as counsel, Spencer Fane LLP as local counsel, Curtis,
Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as conflicts counsel, Blackacre
LLC as its independent expert, and Berkeley Research Group, LLC, as
financial advisor.

On March 17, 2017, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Missouri, Eastern Division, entered an order confirming
the Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of Peabody Energy
Corporation, et al., as Revised March 15, 2017.  At 4:01 p.m.
(Eastern Time), on April 3, 2017, the Effective Date of the Plan
occurred.


PES HOLDINGS: Seeks to Hire Pachulski Stang as Co-Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
PES Holdings, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to employ
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, as co-counsel to the Debtors.

PES Holdings requires Pachulski Stang to:

   a. provide legal advice regarding local rules, practices, and
      procedures;

   b. review and comment on drafts of documents to ensure
      compliance with local rules, practices, and procedures;

   c. file documents as requested by Kirkland & Ellis LLP
      and coordinate with the Debtors' claims agent for service
      of documents;

   d. prepare agenda letters, certificates of no objection,
      certifications of counsel, and notices of fee applications
      and hearings;

   e. prepare hearing binders of documents and pleadings,
      printing of documents and pleadings for hearings;

   f. appear in Court and at any meeting of creditors on behalf
      of the Debtors in its capacity as co-counsel with Kirkland
      & Ellis;

   g. monitor the docket for filings and coordinating with
      Kirkland & Ellis on pending matters that need responses;

   h. prepare and maintain critical dates memorandum to monitor
      pending applications, motions, hearing dates and other
      matters and the deadlines associated with same;
      distributing critical dates memorandum with Kirkland &
      Ellis for review and any necessary coordination for pending
      matters;

   i. handle inquiries and calls from creditors and counsel to
      interested parties regarding pending matters and the
      general status of these Cases, and, to the extent required,
      coordinating with Kirkland & Ellis on any necessary
      responses; and

   j. provide additional administrative support to Kirkland &
      Ellis, as requested.

Pachulski Stang will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners                   $725 to $1,395
     Of Counsels                $650 to $1,095
     Associates                 $575 to $695
     Paraprofessionals          $325 to $425

Pachulski Stang has received payments from the Debtors during the
year prior to the Petition Date in the amount of $150,000.

Pachulski Stang will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for Reviewing Applications
for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Filed under 11
U.S.C. Sec. 330 for Attorneys in Larger Chapter 11 Cases, the
following is provided in response to the request for additional
information:

   Question:  Did you agree to any variations from, or
              alternatives to, your standard or customary billing
              arrangements for this engagement?

   Response:  No.

   Question:  Do any of the professionals included in this
              engagement vary their rate based on the geographic
              location of the bankruptcy case?

   Response:  No.

   Question:  If you represented the client in the 12 months
              prepetition, disclose your billing rates and
              material financial terms for the prepetition
              engagement, including any adjustments during the 12
              months prepetition. If your billing rates and
              material financial terms have changed postpetition,
              explain the difference and the reasons for the
              difference.

   Response:  Pachulski Stang represented the Debtors during the
              12 month period prepetition, as certain of the
              Debtors are post-confirmation Debtors in the
              jointly administered chapter 11 cases.

   Question:  Has your client approved your prospective budget
              and staffing plan, and, if so for what budget
              period?

   Response:  The Debtors and Pachulski Stang expect to develop a
              prospective budget and staffing plan to comply with
              the U.S. Trustee's requests for information and
              additional disclosures, recognizing that in the
              course of these large chapter 11 cases, there may
              be unforeseeable fees and expenses that will need
              to be addressed by the Debtors and Pachulski Stang.

Laura Davis Jones, a partner at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their
estates.

Pachulski Stang can be reached at:

     Laura Davis Jones, Esq.
     James E. O'Neill, Esq.
     Peter J. Keane, Esq.
     PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP
     919 North Market Street, 17th Floor
     Wilmington, DE 19899-8705
     Tel:  (302) 652-4100
     Fax:  (302) 652-4400
     E-mail: ljones@pszjlaw.com
             pkeane@pszjlaw.com
             joneill@pszjlaw.com

                      About PES Holdings

Headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, PES Holdings LLC and
its subsidiaries are owners and operators of oil refining complex
and have been continuously operating in some form for over 150
years.

PES Energy Inc. is the indirect parent company of Philadelphia
Energy Solutions Refining and Marketing LLC (PESRM). PESRM owns and
operates the Point Breeze and Girard Point oil refineries located
on an integrated, 1,300-acre refining complex in Philadelphia.

PES Holdings, LLC, and seven subsidiaries, including PES Energy,
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
19-11626) on July 21, 2019.

PSE Holdings estimated $1 billion to $10 billion in assets and the
same range of liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as local bankruptcy
counsel; PJT Partners LP as financial advisor; and Alvarez & Marsal
North America, LLC, as restructuring advisor. Omni Management
Group, Inc., is the notice and claims agent.

The Company's proposed DIP financing lenders are represented by
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc.



PHUNWARE INC: Incurs $3.1 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
Phunware, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss of $3.06
million on $5.51 million of net revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2019, compared to net income of $4.47 million on $14.18
million of net revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2018.

Phunware stated, "We expect that our operating expenses will be
higher than our net revenues for the foreseeable future, we
currently lack sufficient working capital and we do not currently
have financing available to pay all liabilities as they are
scheduled to come due in the next twelve months.  We are working on
several contingency plans within our control to conserve existing
liquidity through the reduction of discretionary expenses.  We are
also exploring various alternatives including debt and equity
financing vehicles, alternative offerings, and strategic
partnerships."

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company reported a net
loss of $6.56 million on $10.82 million of net revenues compared to
a net loss of $2.69 million on $19.16 million of net revenues for
the same period a year ago.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $31.01 million in total
assets, $22.87 million in total liabilities, and $8.14 million in
total stockholders' equity.

"Our first half financial performance has provided a strong
foundation for our growth strategies throughout the balance of the
year and into 2020," said Alan S. Knitowski, CEO and co-founder of
Phunware.  "Our SaaS, data and blockchain offerings for mobile
uniquely position us to deliver true digital transformation for our
customers, enabling 1:1 real-time interactions between consumers
and brands in both the virtual and physical world alike."

Recent Business Highlights and Announcements

Notable customer and partner wins:

    * Closed Mount Sinai Health System Contract for MaaS Platform
      Licensing

    * Closed Susan Miller's Astrology Zone Contract for MaaS
      Blockchain-Enabled Data Exchange and Mobile Loyalty
      Ecosystem

    * Closed L&T Technology Services Partnership for Phunware-   
      Enabled Corporate Campus Contract with Fortune 50 Company

   * Closed Comport Partnership for Best-in-Class Mobile Patient
     Experience Offering

Awards and recognition:

   * Joined the FTSE Russell 2000, FTSE Russell 3000 and FTSE
     Russell Microcap Indexes

   * Rang the Opening Bell at the Nasdaq MarketSite in Times  
     Square on July 12, 2019

   * Awarded 2019 North America Company of the Year Award by
     Frost & Sullivan

   * Recognized as Top 10 Indoor Positioning Solution Provider by
     CIO Applications

MaaS platform updates:

   * Announced new Data and Knowledge Graph Products and launched
     Blockchain-Enabled Data Exchange and Mobile Loyalty
     Ecosystem

    * Announced Dual Token Structure for the PhunCoin Security
      Token and the Phun Utility Token, along with the Sale of
      the Phun Utility Token to International Markets

    * Partnered with Wave Financial for Initial Exchange
      Offerings and Listings of the Phun Utility Token

Phunware, PhunCoin and Phun Advisory Board appointments:

    * Cambridge Analytica whistleblower: Brittany Kaiser, from
      Netflix documentary The Great Hack

    * Koherent, Inc., Chief Executive Officer: Sean Koh

Conferences and events:

   * Alan S. Knitowski, CEO and co-founder, presented at the
     Southern California Investment Forum (SCIF) in Las Vegas,
     Nevada

   * Randall Crowder, COO, moderated the OPEX Exchange Conference
     Panel in Alexandria, Virginia

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                       https://is.gd/XWw7RT

                        About Phunware

Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Phunware, Inc. --
http://www.phunware.com/-- claims to be the pioneer of
Multiscreen-as-a-Service (MaaS), a fully integrated enterprise
cloud platform for mobile that provides companies the products,
solutions, data and services necessary to engage, manage and
monetize their mobile application portfolios and audiences globally
at scale.  Phunware helps brands create category-defining mobile
experiences, with more than one billion active devices touching its
platform each month.

Phunware incurred a net loss of $9.80 million in 2018 following a
net loss of $25.93 million in 2017.  As of March 31, 2019, Phunware
had $31.43 million in total assets, $20.62 million in total
liabilities, and $10.80 million in total stockholders' equity.

Marcum LLP, in New York, NY, the Company's auditor since 2017,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated March
19, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has a
significant working capital deficiency, has incurred significant
losses and needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations
and sustain its operations.  These conditions raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


PRESSURE BIOSCIENCES: Reports $4.07-Mil. Net Loss for 2nd Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Pressure Biosciences, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
attributable to common stockholders of $4.07 million on $518,663 of
total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to
a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $13.12 million on
$638,773 of total revenue for the three months ended June 30,
2018.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company reported a net
loss attributable to common stockholders of $7.54 million on $1.02
million of total revenue compared to a net loss attributable to
common stockholders of $15.35 million on $1.25 million of total
revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $2.24 million in total assets,
$10.42 million in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $8.18 million.

The Company has experienced negative cash flows from operations
with respect to its pressure cycling technology business since its
inception.  As of June 30, 2019, the Company did not have adequate
working capital resources to satisfy its current liabilities and as
a result, the Company has substantial doubt regarding its ability
to continue as a going concern.  The Company has been successful in
raising cash through debt and equity offerings in the past and the
Company received $4.9 million in net proceeds from loans and $2.3
million in net proceeds from sales of preferred stock in the first
half of 2019. The Company has efforts in place to continue to raise
cash through debt and equity offerings.

"We will need substantial additional capital to fund our operations
in future periods," said Pressure Biosciences.  "If we are unable
to obtain financing on acceptable terms, or at all, we will likely
be required to cease our operations, pursue a plan to sell our
operating assets, or otherwise modify our business strategy, which
could materially harm our future business prospects."

Net cash used in operations for the six months ended June 30, 2019
was $3,300,203 as compared to $2,603,039 for the six months ended
June 30, 2018.  The Company agreed to issue 110,833 additional
shares of common stock at $2.50 per share to an investor.  The fair
value was recorded as other charge of $340,257.  The Company also
issued 110,833 additional warrants with an exercise price of $3.50
and an expiration period of five years from the original issue
date.  The fair value was recorded as other charges of $312,637.
The Company also paid interest toward loans in 2018.

Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June
30, 2019 was $28,915 compared to $16,617 in the prior period.  Cash
capital expenditures in the current year included laboratory
equipment and IT equipment.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended
June 30, 2019 was $3,343,933 as compared to $2,540,497 for the same
period in the prior year.  The cash from financing activities in
the period ended June 30, 2019 included $2,292,300 net proceeds
from sales of preferred stock, $0 from the Company's Revolving Note
and $3,339,050 from convertible debt, net of fees and less payment
on convertible debt of $2,533,985.  The Company also received
$1,211,500 from non-convertible debt, net of fees, less payment on
non-convertible debt of $964,932.  Related parties also lent the
Company $125,000 in short-term non-convertible loans of which the
Company repaid $125,000 back.  The cash from financing activities
in the period ending June 30, 2018 included $1,610,000 from the
Company's Revolving Note and $140,215 from warrant exercises.  The
Company also received $1,987,752 from non-convertible debt, net of
fees, less payment on non-convertible debt of $478,141 and payment
on convertible debt of $840,541.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/D3Xq43

                        Earnings Call Held

On Aug. 15, 2019, Pressure BioSciences held an earnings phone call
open to the public.  Mr. Richard T. Schumacher, chief executive
officer, discussed the financial and operating results of the
Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2019 as well as other items
regarding the Company's fiscal year 2019.  Some of those items
included: (i) a key employee of the Company, Brad Young,
voluntarily left the Company to pursue other opportunities, (ii)
the Company received two binding purchase orders for its UST-based
BaroShear K45 processing system for CBD nanoemulsification, and
(iii) the Company executed an agreement with a large pharmaceutical
company whereby the Company will provide services related to its
Barofold division.

                     About Pressure Biosciences

South Easton, Massachusetts-based Pressure BioSciences --
http://www.pressurebiosciences.com/-- is engaged in the
development and sale of innovative, broadly enabling,
pressure-based solutions for the worldwide life sciences industry.
The Company's products are based on the unique properties of both
constant (i.e., static) and alternating (i.e., pressure cycling
technology) hydrostatic pressure.  PCT is a patented enabling
technology platform that uses alternating cycles of hydrostatic
pressure between ambient and ultra-high levels to safely and
reproducibly control bio-molecular interactions.

Pressure Biosciences reported a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $23.47 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018,
compared to a net loss attributable to common shareholders of
$10.71 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31,
2018, the Company had $2.39 million in total assets, $8.52 million
in total liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $6.12
million.

MaloneBailey, LLP, in Houston, Texas, the Company's auditor since
2015, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 16, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has a
working capital deficit, has incurred recurring net losses and
negative cash flows from operations.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


R&G FINANCIAL: Dismissal of A. Zucker Suit vs Ex-Officers Upheld
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit, affirms the district
court's dismissal of the case captioned Clifford A. ZUCKER, in his
capacity as plan administrator of R&G Financial Corp., Plaintiff,
Appellant, v. Rolando RODRIGUEZ; Maria Vina; Conjugal Partnership
Rodriguez-Vina; Nelida Fundora; Andres I. Perez; Joseph R.
Sandoval; Jacqueline Marie Cates-Elledge; Conjugal Partnership
Sandoval-Cates; Vicente Gregorio; Carmen A. Martinez; Conjugal
Partnership Gregorio-Martinez; Melba Acosta; XL Specialty Insurance
Company; Victor J. Galan; Conjugal Partnership Galan-Fundora;
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of R-G Premier
Bank of Puerto Rico, Defendants, Appellees, No. 17-1749 (1st Cir.)
albeit on a different reasoning.

In 2010, R&G Financial Corporation, a holding company, entered
Chapter 11 bankruptcy after its primary subsidiary, R-G Premier
Bank of Puerto Rico (the Bank), failed. Weeks prior, Puerto Rican
regulators had closed the Bank and named the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as the Bank's receiver. The Bank's
failure was one of the largest in Puerto Rico's history, costing
the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund at least $1.2 billion.

Two years after the Bank's failure, Clifford Zucker, the plan
administrator for the Chapter 11 estate of R&G Financial (the
Holding Company), filed the suit against six of the Holding
Company's former directors and officers (the Directors) and their
insurer, XL Specialty Insurance Company. The Administrator's
complaint alleged that negligence and breach of fiduciary duties
owed to the Holding Company caused the Bank's failure and the
Holding Company's resultant loss of its investment in the Bank. The
FDIC intervened to defend its interests as the Bank's receiver,
arguing that the claims asserted belonged to it and not to the
Administrator.

The FDIC and the Directors argue that the Administrator's complaint
must be dismissed because the claims he has asserted for the
Holding Company are the FDIC's under 12 U.S.C. section
1821(d)(2)(A), a provision of the Financial Institutions Reform,
Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA). That provision
provides that as receiver of a bank, the FDIC "shall ... succeed to
... all rights, titles, powers, and privileges of the insured
depository institution, and of any stockholder ... of such
institution with respect to the institution and the assets of the
institution." The Court agrees that, under section 1821(d)(2)(A),
the FDIC succeeded to the Administrator's claims, and affirms on
that ground.

The Court holds that the long history of extensive federal
involvement in the savings and loan industry reveals that the
protection of depositors and the stability of thrift institutions
are paramount among congressional concerns. A strong and solvent
deposit insurance fund and an FDIC well-equipped to recover funds
to address the needs of failed banks are essential to achieving
those goals. The Court doubts that a Congress with these concerns
would have intended to allow a holding company that played a role
in the failure of its subsidiary bank to recover for that bank's
failure at the expense of the FDIC, the deposit insurance fund, and
ultimately, ordinary depositors and taxpayers. The judgment of the
district court is, therefore, affirmed.

A copy of the Court's Decision dated March 27, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2NuKHjm from Leagle.com.

Alfred S. Lurey, with whom Stephen E. Hudson, Todd C. Meyers,
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Atlanta, GA, Carlos A.
Rodríguez-Vidal, and Goldman Antonetti & Córdova, L.L.C., San
Juan, PR, were on brief for appellant.

Joseph Brooks, Counsel, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, with
whom Colleen J. Boles, Assistant General Counsel, and Kathryn R.
Norcross, Senior Counsel, were on brief for appellee Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Andrew W. Robertson, Zwerling, Schachter & Zwerling, LLP, New York,
NY, Roberto A. Camara-Fuertes, and Ferraiuoli LLC on brief for
appellees Joseph R. Sandoval, Jaqueline Marie Cates-Elledge, and
Conjugal Partnership Sandoval-Elledge.

Andres Rivero , Alan H. Rolnick , M. Paula Aguila , Bryan L.
Paschal, and Rivero Mestre LLP, Miami, FL, on brief for appellees
Rolando Rodriguez, Andres I. Perez, Vicente Gregorio, Melba
Acosta-Febo, and Victor J. Galan.

                     About R&G Financial

San Juan, Puerto Rico-based R&G Financial Corporation was the
direct parent of R-G Premier Bank of Puerto Rico, a state-chartered
nonmember bank, through which RGFC primarily conducted its
business.  The Company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D. P.R. Case No. 10-04124) on May 14, 2010.  Brent R.
McIlwain, Esq., Robert W. Jones, Esq., Esq., at Patton Boggs LLP,
in Dallas; and Jorge I. Peirats, Esq., at Pietrantoni, Mendez &
Alvarez, in Hato Rey, P.R., serve as the Debtores bankruptcy
counsel.  The Debtor disclosed US$40,213,356 in assets and
US$420,687,694 in debts as of the Petition Date.


R1 RCM: S&P Withdraws 'B-' Issuer Credit Rating
-----------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew its 'B-' issuer credit rating on
technology-enabled revenue cycle management services provider R1
RCM Inc. at the issuer's request. At the time of the withdrawal,
the rating had a stable outlook.



RHINO RUSH: Court Junks Bid for TRO vs Raw Pharma
-------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Terry L. Myers denied Rhino Rush, LLC's Ex Parte
Motion for Entry of a Pre-judgment Writ of Attachment or Temporary
Restraining Order/Motion for Preliminary Injunction in the case
captioned RHINO RUSH, LLC, Debtor in Possession, Plaintiff, v. RAW
PHARMA, LLC, a Utah limited liability company; RHINO RUSH, LLC, a
Texas limited liability company; and DOES 1-25, Defendants, Adv.
Proc. No. 19-06019-TLM (Bankr. D. Idaho).

Debtor Rhino Rush, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company filed a
petition under chapter 11 at approximately 3:00 p.m. on March 22,
2019, commencing this case. Later that same day, Debtor filed the
complaint commencing Adversary Proc. No. 19-06019-TLM. Debtor is
suing Raw Pharma, LLC and Rhino Rush, LLC, a separate entity with a
name identical to Debtor's. The Complaint "seeks injunctive relief
restraining Raw Pharma, LLC, from continuing to exert dominion and
control over the assets of the Debtor and requiring Raw Pharma,
LLC, to return assets already taken and/or liquidated by Raw
Pharma, LLC."

The Court holds that preliminary injunction or similar equitable
relief has not been shown as reasonably required in connection with
Debtor's arguments under the second and third causes of action
contending that the prepetition transfers to Raw Pharma constitute
preferential transfers or fraudulent transfers under section 547 or
section 548 of the Code. Debtor has not shown, inter alia, that
Defendants would be unable to respond to a judgment on such claims
should one be obtained. Debtor has not established other grounds on
which a prejudgment attachment would be warranted as to those two
causes of action.

As to the first cause of action, which seeks injunctive relief that
would, in effect, unwind the turnover of Debtor's assets and
control of its business under the "Transfer Documents" executed on
March 11, the Court also finds the showing inadequate.

Under the case law, Debtor must show at least a likelihood, or
perhaps a strong likelihood, of success on the merits. Excel
Innovations would suggest that a showing of a reasonable likelihood
of a successful reorganization is appropriate. The submissions
regarding a plan of reorganization are vague and conclusory. But
the reorganization that Debtor apparently advances, in broad terms,
requires its possession of the business assets. Here, that would
require Debtor to show that it may be entitled to rescind, negate
or otherwise avoid the consequences of the Transfer Documents it
entered into. Debtor's submissions seem to suggest a theory of
duress. But there are limitations under Idaho law on such a
contention.

While it would be premature to evaluate the entirety of the
allegations made by Debtor on this issue, the Court must
consider--for purposes of granting the extraordinary ex parte
equitable relief sought--whether Debtor has established the
"likelihood of success on the merits" required on this cause.
Having reviewed the authorities, and all the material that Debtor
has provided in support of the Motion, the Court finds this showing
has not been made.

As a result, the Court concludes the Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a
Pre-judgment Writ of Attachment or Temporary Restraining
Order/Motion for Preliminary Injunction must be denied.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum of Decision dated March 27, 2019
is available at https://bit.ly/2NuZzht from Leagle.com.

RHINO RUSH, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew Todd
Christensen, Angstman Johnson, PLLC.

Raw Pharma, LLC & Rhino Rush, LLC, Defendants, represented by
Kimbell D. Gourley.

                  About Rhino Rush LLC

Rhino Rush, LLC is a beverage manufacturer in Meridian, Idaho,
which offers a lineup of energy shots and energy drinks.

Rhino Rush sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Idaho Case No. 19-00302) on March 22, 2019. In the
petition signed by Joshua Swenson, manager, the Debtor estimated
$1,177,544 in assets and $1,174,388 in liabilities. Matthew Todd
Christensen, Esq., at Angstman Johnson, PLLC, is the Debtor's
counsel.


RODAN & FIELDS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B'; Outlook Negative
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on Rodan &
Fields LLC's (R+F) to 'B' from 'B+', and revised the outlook to
negative.

At the same time, S&P lowered its issue-level rating on the
company's senior secured facility to 'B+' from 'BB-'. The '2'
recovery rating remains unchanged.

The downgrade and negative outlook reflect the company's
deteriorating credit metrics and cash flow generation as it is
unable to stabilize its new consultant enrollment rates and stem
the decline in its sales. The company's sales continued to decline
by the double digit percent area during the second quarter ended
June 30, 2019, and S&P now expects this trend to continue for the
rest of the year, which compares with its previous expectation that
R+F would stabilize its performance in the second half of 2019. The
company's revenue growth is highly correlated with new consultant
and customer enrollments in its network marketing business model.
It has become increasingly difficult for R+F to recruit new
consultants because the expansion of the gig economy has increased
the number of options available to those seeking part-time income
generation. This is evidenced by the decline in the company's
consultant enrollment figures, which declined in the second quarter
of 2019 following a brief period of stabilization in the first
quarter.

The negative outlook on R+F reflects the potential that S&P will
lower its rating on the company in the next 12 months if its
performance does not stabilize and it fails to generate over $15
million of cash flow (after required tax distributions) on a
sustained basis or if its adjusted leverage approaches 5x.

"We could lower our ratings on R+F if its sales continue to decline
because of a low level of new consultant enrollments that --
coupled with its high investments in its business -- hinder the
company's efforts to improve and sustain cash flow generation of
more than $15 million (after required tax distributions) or if its
adjusted leverage approaches 5x," S&P said, adding that it could
also lower its ratings if the company's liquidity position
deteriorates and the springing covenant on its revolver becomes
effective. Given its expectation for a narrow covenant cushion, S&P
believes R+F may find it difficult to remain in compliance with its
covenants if its operations continue to decline.

"We could revise our outlook on R+F to stable if the company
stabilizes its sales and generates at least $30 million of cash
flow, after required tax distributions, on a sustained basis. We
believe this could occur if the company's consultant and preferred
customer enrollment levels return to growth with the successful
implementation of its digital platform and new product innovations,
which should enable its consultants to more effectively sell its
products and recruit new customers," S&P said.


RUE21 INC: Liquidated Damages Provision Enforceable, Ct. Rules
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned RUE21, INC., Appellant, v. LOS LUNAS
INVESTORS, LLC., Appellee, No. 18-CV-715 (W.D. Pa.), Senior
District Judge Donetta W. Ambrose affirms in part and reverses in
part the May 3, 2018 order of the Bankruptcy Court granting in part
and denying in part Appellee's Limited Objection to Cure Amount and
Reservation of Rights.

On appeal, Appellant argues: 1) The Bankruptcy Court improperly
denied the Appellant liquidated damages, and 2) The Bankruptcy
Court erred by fashioning relief that is inconsistent with the
parties' request. On cross-appeal, Appellee-Landlord argues: 1) The
Bankruptcy Court improperly found that the burden of proof to
challenge the liquidated damages clause fell on Appellee-Landlord,
and 2) The Liquidated Damages Provision as a whole was improper and
must be stricken.

The first issue is who bears the burden of proof under New Mexico
law, the party seeking to invalidate the provision or the party
seeking to enforce the provision. Based on Gruschus and its
rationale, Fort Knox Self Storage, Inc. v. Western Technologies,
Inc., 142 P.3d 1, (N.M. Ct. App. 2006), and the basic tenets of
contract law, the Bankruptcy Court placed the burden on
Appellee-Landlord. Appellee-Landlord suggests the Bankruptcy Court
erred in placing the burden on it because the Court failed to
evaluate the factors relevant when predicting an issue of state
law. Specifically, Appellee-Landlord suggests that the Bankruptcy
Court should have looked to the state law of Oklahoma, Arkansas,
Maine and Tennessee. There is no foundation for Appellee-Landlord's
assertion that the Bankruptcy Court should look to any other
particular state law when the Supreme Court of the state at issue
has placed the burden on the party seeking to invalidate the
liquidated damages provision. By application, the Supreme Court of
New Mexico has held that the burden of proof lies with the party
seeking to invalidate the provision. Thus, under New Mexico law and
the basic tenets of contract law, Appellee-Landlord has the burden
to prove that the Liquidated Damages Provision was unenforceable.
Therefore, the Court finds the Bankruptcy Court did not err in
placing the burden on Appellee-Landlord and holding that the
Liquidated Damages Provision, in this case, is enforceable, unless
proved otherwise by Appellee-Landlord.

With regard to liquidated damages clauses, the New Mexico Supreme
Court has stated that, generally, the "enforcement of such a clause
will only be denied when the stipulated amount is so extravagant or
disproportionate as to show fraud, mistake or oppression." The
Appellee-Landlord suggests that the Bankruptcy Court erred in
burdening it to prove actual fraud, mistake, or oppression. This
argument is not persuasive. The Bankruptcy Court stated that it was
following Gruschus. Thus, the Bankruptcy Court did not require
Appellee-Landlord to show actual fraud, mistake or oppression.
Rather, to prove the Liquidated Damages Provision is unenforceable,
the Bankruptcy Court properly charged Appellee-Landlord with the
burden of showing the agreed upon amount is so extravagant or
disproportionate as to show fraud, mistake or oppression. Thus, the
Court finds no error in this regard.

The Court finds no support in case law for bifurcating and parsing
the language of section2.4(v) of the Liquidated Damages Provision
as the Bankruptcy Court did here. Effectively, the Bankruptcy Court
completely rewrote the Liquidated Damages Provision. It is
well-established contract law that courts will not rewrite a
contract for the parties. The ultimate question is whether section
2.4(v) is enforceable or unenforceable. In fact, the parties agree
that this determination is an all or nothing proposition. The Court
finds that by modifying the terms as it did, the Bankruptcy Court
improperly rewrote the terms of the Liquidated Damages Provision of
the Lease.

The Bankruptcy Court's determination should have ended after it
held that the Appellee-Landlord failed to meet "its burden of proof
with evidence that the language in its totality in Section 2.4 is
extravagant or disproportionate as a whole." At that point, the
Bankruptcy Court should have entered an order enforcing the
Liquidated Damages Provision. Therefore, the Court finds the
Bankruptcy Court erred in failing to enforce the Liquidated Damages
Provision as written.

Accordingly, the Court affirms the Bankruptcy Court's May 3, 2018
Order, to the extent that it holds section2.4(v) of the Lease is
enforceable and reverses to the extent the Order deems the
"additional increase in the Late Delivery Credit" unenforceable.
The Court remands the matter to the Bankruptcy Court with the
direction to deny the Limited Objection to Cure Amount and
Reservation of Rights by Appellee-Landlord consistent with this
opinion.

A copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 27, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2ZmZq6d from Leagle.com.

RUE21, INC., Appellant, represented by Jared S. Roach --
jroach@reedsmith.com -- Reed Smith LLP.

LOS LUNAS INVESTORS, LLC., Appellee, represented by Arthur W.
Zamosky -- azamosky@bernsteinlaw.com -- Bernstein-Burkley, P.C. &
Keri P. Ebeck -- kebeck@bernsteinlaw.com -- Bernstein-Burkley,
P.C.

                         About rue21

rue21 -- http://www.rue21.com/-- is a teen specialty apparel
retailer.  For over 37 years, rue21 has been famous for offering
the latest trends at an affordable price point. It has core brands
in girls' apparel (rue21), intimate apparel (true), girls'
accessories (etc!), girls' cosmetics (ruebeaute!), guys' apparel
and accessories (Carbon), girls' plus-size apparel (rue+), and
girls' swimwear (ruebleu).  The company is headquartered in
Warrendale, Pennsylvania and have one distribution center located
in Weirton, West Virginia.

Headquartered just north of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, rue21 had
1,179 stores in 48 states in shopping malls, outlets and strip
centers, and on its website.  In April, Company began the process
of closing approximately 400 underperforming stores in its 1,179
store fleet in order to streamline operations.

On May 15, 2017, rue21, inc., and affiliates filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. W.D. Pa. Lead Case No. 17-22045).  Todd M. Lenhart, the
Company's senior vice president, treasurer, chief financial
officer, and chief accounting officer, signed the petitions.

The Debtors have sought joint administration of the Chapter 11
cases.  The Honorable Gregory L. Taddonio is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Reed Smith LLP as local counsel; Kirkland &
Ellis LLP as bankruptcy counsel; Rothschild Inc., as investment
banker; Berkeley Research Group, LLC, as financial advisor; A&G
Realty Partners, LLC, as real estate advisor and consultant; and
Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims and notice agent.

rue21 estimated $1 billion to $10 billion in assets and
liabilities.

Counsel to the DIP Term Loan Agent, DIP Term Loan Lenders,
Prepetition Term Loan Agent and Term Loan Steering Committee are
Scott J. Greenberg, Esq., Michael J. Cohen, Esq., and Jeffrey J.
Bresch, Esq., at Jones Day.

Counsel to the DIP ABL Agent and the Prepetition ABL Agent are
Julia Frost-Davies, Esq., and Amelia C. Joiner, Esq., at Morgan
Lewis & Bockius LLP; and James D. Newell, Esq., and Timothy Palmer,
Esq., at Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC.

The Sponsor Lenders are represented by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett's
Elisha D. Graff, Esq.

An Ad Hoc Cross-Holder Group is represented by Milbank, Tweed,
Hadley & McCloy's Gerard Uzzi, Esq., and Eric Stodola, Esq.

Andrew R. Vara, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, on May 23, 2017,
appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors.  The Committee has tapped Cooley LLP as
counsel; and Fox Rothschild LLP as local counsel.


SAO FERNANDO ACUCAR: Chapter 15 Case Summary
--------------------------------------------
Chapter 15 Debtor:      Sao Fernando Acucar e Alcool Ltda.,
                        Sao Fernando Energia I Ltda.,
                        Sao Fernando Energia II Ltda.,
                        Sao Marcos Energia e Participacoes Ltda.,&

                        Sao Pio Empreendimentos e Participacoes
                        Ltda.

Business Description:   Sao Fernando Acucar e Alcool Ltda.
                        operates a thermoelectric plant which uses

                        sugar cane as fuel.


Chapter 15
Petition Date:          August 22, 2019

Court:                  United States Bankruptcy Court
                        Southern District of Florida (Miami)

Chapter 15 Case No.:    19-21256

Judge:                  Hon. Jay A. Cristol

Foreign
Representative:         Vinicius Coutinho Consultoria e
                        Pericia S/S Ltda.
                        Rua Treze De Maiao
                        2500-13 andar, 1307
                        Campo Grande, MS
                        79002-923
                        Brazil

Foreign
Representative's
Counsel:                Leyza F. Blanco, Esq.
                        SEQUOR LAW, P.A.
                        1001 Brickell Bay Drive, 9th Floor
                        Miami, FL 33131
                        Tel: 305-372-8282
                        Email: lblanco@sequorlaw.com

Estimated Assets:       Unknown

Estimated Debts:        Unknown

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-21256.pdf


SIMPLY GOOD FOODS: S&P Places 'B+' ICR on Watch Neg. on Quest Deal
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all of its ratings on Simply Good Foods,
including the 'B+' issuer credit rating, on CreditWatch with
negative implications, meaning that it could lower (or affirm) its
ratings following the completion of its review.

The CreditWatch listing comes after Simply Good Foods announced its
definitive agreement to buy Quest Nutrition for $1.0 billion. S&P
estimates pro-forma leverage at close will rise to 7x, well above
S&P's current 5x downgrade trigger, assuming $775 million of the
purchase price is funded with debt and no synergies are factored
in. The company, however, believes there are $20 million of
achievable synergies over the next three years, and S&P will review
this assertion ahead of concluding its CreditWatch. Although S&P
views positively the company's stated intent to issue equity to
reduce leverage by November, ahead of the close of the transaction,
the timing and success of issuing common stock remains uncertain
given present market volatility.

"We will resolve the CreditWatch for Simply Good Foods within the
next three months when we have more information, including a review
of Quest Nutrition's financials, potential synergies, and a
timeline of a potential equity offering and deleveraging. We will
also assess financial policies and the impact of the transaction on
the company's capital structure" S&P said, adding that it could
lower its ratings on Simply Good Foods by up to one notch if
leverage will exceed 5x, pro-forma for the transaction.


SUSQUEHANNA AREA: Fitch Affirms BB+ on $138.5MM Airport Bonds
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Susquehanna Area Regional Airport
Authority, PA's approximately $138.5 million senior airport revenue
bonds at 'BB+'. The Rating Outlook is Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The 'BB+' rating reflects the authority's small enplanement base
with elevated exposure to nearby air service competition, an
elevated leverage profile resulting in a high airline cost per
enplanement (CPE), and stable but still narrow overall coverage
levels from airport cash flow. This is balanced by the airport's
modest capital program without any need for additional borrowings,
coupled with an airline agreement containing adequate backstop and
cost recovery provisions.

Small Enplanement Base with Competition - Revenue Risk (Volume):
Weaker

Harrisburg International Airport (MDT) serves primarily as an
origination and destination (O&D) airport of more than 650,000
enplanements in the state's capital region. MDT's location draws
passengers from a regional air trade service area, anchored by
economic support from state government, corporations and
universities. While enplanement growth has been significant in
recent years, led by new ultra-low cost carrier services, the
longer term sustainability of passenger traffic is still
constrained by significant regional competition from Philadelphia
International Airport (PHL; A/Stable) and Baltimore/Washington
Thurgood Marshall Airport (BWI; PFC-backed A/Stable).

Adequate Cost Recovery - Revenue Risk (Price): Midrange (Revised
from Weaker)

The current hybrid airline use agreement, which runs through 2019,
is supportive to operating revenues and allows the authority to
raise airline rates and charges as necessary through an
extraordinary coverage charge to meet all costs. However, the high
fixed-cost profile driven by the airport's debt burden results in
an elevated airline CPE. While overall airport costs are expected
to remain stable in the near term, airline CPE is vulnerable to
potential traffic declines.

Modern Facility, Moderate Capital Needs - Infrastructure & Renewal:
Stronger

Updated facilities allow the authority to maintain an internally
funded five-year capital plan totalling approximately $45 million.
Funding is expected to be sourced primarily from federal and state
grants, and no near-term borrowings are anticipated. Limited use of
airport funds to support the capital program could limit the
authority's ability to retain or expand its overall level of cash
and reserves.

Conservative Debt Structure - Debt Structure: Stronger

All bonds are senior and fixed-rate, with flat annual debt service
of approximately $11.0 million through 2037. The previously
outstanding subordinate bonds were repaid upon final maturity in
January 2017, and debt service on senior lien bonds rose in 2018 to
maintain the stable level of debt service. Cash-funded 12-month
debt service reserve funds are maintained and the rate covenant of
1.25x is adequate.

Financial Profile

SARAA's debt service coverage ratio (DSCR; indenture basis) through
2024 is expected to average about 1.6x in Fitch's rating case.
Fitch-calculated coverage (treating passenger facility charges
[PFCs] as revenues) was slightly less robust at 1.4x. The
authority's debt burden remains sizeable resulting in leverage of
9.9x in fiscal 2018. In the rating case, leverage averages 8.5x,
but evolves downward to 7.6x by 2024 as debt amortization
continues. CPE in 2018 remained elevated at $14.19 but does not
appear to have upside pressures at the current traffic level.
Therefore, even under a conservative rating case scenario, CPE
averages $15, in line with current levels. Fitch anticipates
SARAA'S unrestricted cash levels to remain modest but also stable
over time, with a rating case average of 161 days cash on hand
(DCOH). However, SARAA maintains other capital-designated reserves
as well as a bond coverage account for additional liquidity
support.

PEER GROUP

SARAA's peers include 'BBB' category airports with similarly small
enplanement bases and a "Weaker" volume risk profile, such as
Burlington (BBB/Stable), Fresno (BBB+/Stable) and Dayton
(BBB/Stable). Compared with SARAA, other peers have significantly
lower leverage (below 5.0x) and stronger debt service coverage
between 1.5x-2.0x, as well as more competitive current CPE.
Compared with peers, SARAA's combination of a high CPE, elevated
leverage, and narrow DSCR constrain the rating to below
investment-grade.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action:

  -- Sustained declines or uneven trends in passenger traffic
levels leading to fluctuating or unsustainable CPE above current
levels;

  -- Fitch-calculated debt service coverage falling below 1.3x or
leverage increasing to above 10.0x, on a sustained basis.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action:

  -- Leverage evolving at or below 4x on a sustained basis;

  -- Sustained improvement in the airport's traffic base that
generates higher operating revenue and stronger coverage levels.

CREDIT UPDATE

Performance Update

Recent passenger traffic performance has been notably positive as
evidenced by enplanements rising by 8.6% in 2018 to approximately
650,000. All airlines, excluding Delta, increased their available
departure seats, resulting in a total capacity increase of 7.4%.
American Airlines maintained the largest market share at 41%,
followed by Delta at 24%. In summer 2018, Frontier Airlines
returned to the airport; additionally, Allegiant Airlines and
American added services in 2019, while Southern Airlines and Air
Canada reduced services.

Growth has continued into 2019, with enplanements up 18.2% in the
first half of the year, resulting in the busiest six months in the
airport's history. Notably, Frontier and American have led this
growth, increasing enplanements by 36.6% and 15.6%, respectively.
In addition to increased enplanements, seats for sale and load
factors are also up. Low-cost carriers have been driving growth at
MDT and are becoming a stronger presence; as of June 2019,
Allegiant and Frontier together comprise nearly 20% of market
share, up from 12% in 2013. Sustainability of these new services
warrants ongoing monitoring in a market such as Harrisburg as
services from new entrants may evolve based on demand and
profitability.

Operating revenues increased 3.5% to $28.2 million in 2018.
Increased enplanements drove non-airline revenue growth, including
parking and rental car revenues. Apron and gate fees also grew due
to UPS renting an additional exclusive cargo ramp and AvFlight, a
fixed base operator, building a new facility and being charged for
the use of the ramp. YTD 2019 revenues are up an additional 5.3%.

Fitch Cases

Fitch's base case assumes 10% enplanement growth in 2019,
reflecting strong YTD performance, followed by 1% growth in 2020
and 2021, and flat growth for the remainder of the projected
period. Airline revenues are assumed to grow based on the annual
escalation of rates and charges set by the airline agreement
(expected to continue under similar terms), while non-airline
revenues are driven by enplanement levels. Following 4.5% growth in
2019 reflecting YTD results, operating expenses increase by 2.5%
per year. This results in stable Fitch-calculated coverage levels
averaging 1.5x through the forecast period. Leverage remains high,
averaging 7.9x, with CPE in the $13-$14 range.

Fitch's rating case also assumes 10% enplanement growth in 2019,
followed by an aggregate 6% stress through 2021, with recovery
beginning in 2023. Starting in 2020, operating expenses are
stressed an additional 0.5% above base case levels. Airline
revenues are increased to reflect the need for additional cost
recovery and non-airline revenues track enplanements. Under this
scenario, coverage is still adequate, averaging 1.4x. Leverage is
elevated, reaching a maximum of 9.0x, while CPE averages $15.

Asset Description

The Susquehanna Regional Airport Authority owns and operates four
airports: Harrisburg International Airport (HIA/MDT) is the major
scheduled passenger airport for Pennsylvania's south central region
12 miles southeast of downtown Harrisburg in Dauphin County. Other
authority general aviation airports include Capital City Airport
(CXY), Franklin County Regional Airport (FCRA), and Gettysburg
Regional Airport (GRA).

Security

The bonds are primarily secured by a net revenue pledge, and PFCs
are used to offset debt service.


T.A.J. REALTY: Seeks Cash Access, Plans Asset Sale to Pay Off Loan
------------------------------------------------------------------
T.A.J. Realty asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of New York for authority to use cash collateral of LCP
Queens Portfolio LLC in order to pay monthly mortgage and other
expenses estimated at $8,376.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor owes LCP $1,850,595.  The
Debtor is seeking to close a loan in order to pay LCP in full, and
has received a Conditional Loan Approval from LNS Group, LLC for
$2,062,500.

Bruce Feinstein, Esq., counsel to the Debtor, relates that the
Debtor is considering selling its real property with an estimated
value of $2,250,000 if the loan does not close within 30 to 45
days.  Accordingly, Mr. Feinstein says that as of the Petition
Date, LCP is substantially over-secured with an equity cushion of
at least $200,000 against the new loan and as much as $500,000 if
the property is sold.

The Debtor also seeks to be able to use funds in its DIP account to
immediately make two mortgage payments of $7,360 each, or $14,720
to LCP after the interim hearing.  The Court has set final hearing
on the Debtor's request on Oct. 3, 2019 at 11 a.m.

                   About T.A.J Realty Group

T.A.J. Realty Group, LLC, a privately held real estate company in
Astoria, New York, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
Case No. 19-41789) on March 27, 2019.  As of the Petition Date, the
Debtor estimated assets of at least $50,000 and liabilities between
$1 million and $10 million.  Judge Nancy Hershey Lord is assigned
the Debtor's case.  Bruce Feinstein, Esq., at LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE
FEINSTEIN, is the Debtor's counsel.





TTM TECHNOLOGIES: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'BB' ICR
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised the outlook to negative from stable and
affirmed the 'BB' rating on U.S.-based print circuit board (PCB)
manufacturer TTM Technologies Inc.

The rating action reflects S&P's view that TTM's underperformance
in the first half of 2019 versus the rating agency's base case
scenario will weigh on its full year results, with mid-single-digit
percentage revenue declines expected for 2019, along with EBITDA
declines of around 12%. It now expects S&P Global Ratings adjusted
leverage to be slightly over 3x by fiscal year end 2019, in
contrast to its prior expectation of leverage in the mid-2x by end
of 2019. Although S&P is currently forecasting leverage to improve
to the mid-2x by end of 2020, given the uncertainty of overall
macroeconomic trends, including the ongoing trade dispute with
China, the rating agency believes there exists considerable
volatility to its 2020 forecast.

The negative outlook reflects S&P's view that TTM will continue to
be pressured by ongoing global macro conditions impacting its end
markets in 2019. The rating agency expects mid-single-digit
percentage revenue declines in 2019 and weaker EBITDA margins from
lower utilization rates. In addition, the potential for current end
market weakness to persist into 2020 could lead to S&P Global
Ratings adjusted leverage being above 3x over the next 12 months.

"We could lower the rating if declines in its key end markets,
resulting in part from volatility in the automotive, cellular, and
networking and communications industries, pricing pressure from
customers, or higher labor costs, cause further EBITDA declines,
resulting in leverage forecasted to exceed 3x on a sustained
basis," S&P said.

"We could revise the outlook to stable if TTM's key end markets
return to growth (automotive, cellular, computing, networking),
leading us to expect leverage to reach the mid-2x on a sustained
basis," the rating agency said.


VELMO USA: Gets OK for Interim Cash Collateral Use
--------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Kentucky
approved the emergency motion of Velmo USA, LLC, to continue using
cash collateral in the ordinary course of its business.

The Court ruled that AmeriFactors Financial Group, LLC, and Eclipse
Bank, Inc., -- prepetition creditors to the Debtor -- are entitled
to adequate protection of their interests in the cash collateral.
AmeriFactors and Eclipse Bank are deemed to have continued interest
in the Debtor's inventory, equipment, chattel paper, and letters of
credit, among others.  AmeriFactors purchased certain of the
Debtor’s accounts receivables pursuant to a prepetition Factoring
Agreement.

The Debtor is directed to pay $4,500 monthly to Eclipse Bank as
adequate protection, to be applied first to the interest and fees
outstanding on Eclipse Bank's prepetition secured claim, and then
against the remaining principal balance on the prepetition secured
claim.  The rights and protections in the Order are provided on an
interim basis, and subject to a final hearing on the Debtor's use
of cash collateral.

                        About Velmo USA

Velmo USA, LLC, is a global sourcing ISO 9001:2008 certified
company serving a diverse range of industries including automotive,
construction, chemical & food industries and more.  The Company
offers hot forged ring, castings, CNC machine parts, screw machine
parts, steel tubes, sheet metal fabrications, metal stamping parts,
and forgings.  

Velmo USA filed a petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 19-32515) on Aug. 6, 2019 in
Louisville, Kentucky.  The petition was signed by J. Bradley Law,
president.  The Debtor estimated its assets between $1 million to
$10 million and liabilities also within the same range.  Judge Alan
C. Stout is assigned the Debtor's case.  Kaplan Johnson Abate &
Bird LLP is counsel to the Debtor.


WEATHERFORD INT’L: Ropes, Norton Represent Official Committee
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the Chapter 11 cases of Weatherford International PLC, et al.,
the law firms of Ropes & Gray LLP and Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
submitted a verified statement to comply with Rule 2019 of the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure that they are representing
the United States Trustee for Region 7 appointed Committee of three
members.

As of August 19, 2019, Committee members and their disclosable
economic interests are:

(1) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee
    60 Wall Street,
    24th Floor
    New York, NY 10005

    * $600,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by:
      (i) the Indenture, dated October 1, 2003, among Weatherford
      International Ltd., Weatherford International, Inc., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, and
      (ii) the Officers’ Certificate, dated August 7, 2006, among

      Weatherford International Ltd., Weatherford International,
      Inc., and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee,

      pursuant to which Weatherford International Ltd. issued the
      6.50% Senior Notes due 2036

    * $500,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by:
      (i) the Indenture, dated October 1, 2003, among Weatherford
      International Ltd., Weatherford International, Inc., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, and
      (ii) the First Supplemental Indenture, dated March 25, 2008,

      among Weatherford International Ltd., Weatherford
      International, Inc., and Deutsche Bank Trust Company
      Americas, as trustee, pursuant to which Weatherford
      International Ltd. issued the 7.00% Senior Notes due 2038

    * $250,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by:
      (i) the Indenture, dated October 1, 2003, among Weatherford
      International Ltd., Weatherford International, Inc., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, and
      (ii) the Second Supplemental Indenture, dated January 8,
      2009, among Weatherford International Ltd., Weatherford
      International, Inc., and Deutsche Bank Trust Company
      Americas, as trustee, pursuant to which Weatherford
      International Ltd. issued the 9.875% Senior Notes due 2039

    * $800,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by:
      (i) the Indenture, dated October 1, 2003, among Weatherford
      International Ltd., Weatherford International, Inc., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, and
      (ii) the Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 23,
      2010, among Weatherford International Ltd., Weatherford
      International, Inc., Weatherford International Ltd., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, pursuant  
      to which Weatherford International Ltd. issued 5.125% Senior

      Notes due 2020

    * $600,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by:
      (i) the Indenture, dated October 1, 2003, among Weatherford
      International Ltd., Weatherford International, Inc., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, and
      (ii) the Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 23,
      2010, among Weatherford International Ltd., Weatherford
      International, Inc., Weatherford International Ltd., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, pursuant
      to which Weatherford International Ltd. issued 6.750% Senior

      Notes due 2040

    * $750,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by:
      (i) the Indenture, dated October 1, 2003, among Weatherford
      International Ltd., Weatherford International, Inc., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, and
      (ii) the Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated April 4, 2012,
      among Weatherford International Ltd., Weatherford
      International Ltd., Weatherford International, Inc., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, pursuant
      to which Weatherford International Ltd. issued 4.50% Senior
      Notes due 2022

    * $550,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by:
      (i) the Indenture, dated October 1, 2003, among Weatherford
      International Ltd., Weatherford International, Inc., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, and
      (ii) the Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated April 4, 2012,
      among Weatherford International Ltd., Weatherford
      International Ltd., Weatherford International, Inc., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, pursuant
      to which Weatherford International Ltd. issued 5.95% Senior
      Notes due 2042

    * $1,265,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by:
      (i) the Indenture, dated October 1, 2003, among Weatherford
      International Ltd., Weatherford International, Inc., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, and
      (ii) the Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated June 7, 2016,
      among Weatherford International Ltd., Weatherford
      International, LLC, Weatherford International PLC, and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, pursuant
      to which Weatherford International Ltd. issued the 5.875%
      Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2021

    * $1,500,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by:
      (i) the Indenture, dated October 1, 2003, among Weatherford
      International Ltd., Weatherford International, Inc., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, and
      (ii) the Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated June 17, 2016,
      among Weatherford International Ltd., Weatherford
      International, Inc., Weatherford International PLC, and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, pursuant
      to which Weatherford International Ltd. issued 7.75% Senior
      Notes due 2021 and 8.25% Senior Notes due 2023

    * $540,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by:
      (i) the Indenture, dated October 1, 2003, among Weatherford
      International Ltd., Weatherford International, Inc., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, and
      (ii) the Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated November 18,

      2016, among Weatherford International Ltd., Weatherford
      International, Inc., Weatherford International PLC, and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, pursuant
      to which Weatherford International Ltd. issued 9.875% Senior

      Notes due 2024

    * $300,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by:
      (i) the Indenture, dated June 18, 2007, among Weatherford
      International, LLC, Weatherford International Ltd.,
      Weatherford International PLC, and Deutsche Bank Trust
      Company Americas, as trustee, and (ii) the First
      Supplemental Indenture, dated June 18, 2007, among
      Weatherford International Ltd., Weatherford International,
      Inc., and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee,
      pursuant to which Weatherford International, Inc. issued
      6.80% Senior Notes due 2037

    * $600,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by:
      (i) the Indenture, dated June 18, 2007, among Weatherford  
      International, LLC, Weatherford International Ltd.,
      Weatherford International PLC, and Deutsche Bank Trust  
      Company Americas, as trustee, and (ii) the Sixth
      Supplemental Indenture dated February 28, 2018, among
      Weatherford International Ltd., Weatherford International
      PLC, Weatherford International, LLC, and Deutsche Bank Trust
      Company Americas, as trustee, pursuant to which Weatherford
      International, LLC issued 9.875% Senior Notes due 2025

    * In addition to the foregoing principal amounts, Deutsche
      Bank Trust Company Americas, in its capacity as indenture
      trustee, holds claims for the interests, fees, expenses and
      other liabilities accruing under and evidenced by each of
      the foregoing Indentures, Supplemental Indentures, and the
      associated notes

(2) Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd.
    200 Seaport Blvd. V13H
    Boston, MA 02210

    * Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. is the beneficial owner of

      $1,510,000 in principal amount of notes issued under
      (i) the Indenture, dated October 1, 2003, among Weatherford
      International Ltd., Weatherford International, Inc., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, and
      (ii) the Indenture, dated June 18, 2007, among Weatherford
      International, LLC, Weatherford International Ltd.,  
      Weatherford International PLC, and Deutsche Bank Trust
      Company Americas, as trustee

(3) Rapid Completions LLC
    120 Newport Center Drive
    Newport Beach, CA 92660

    * Rapid Completions LLC has a contingent and unliquidated  
      claim

Proposed Counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
can be reached at:

        ROPES & GRAY LLP
        Mark R. Somerstein, Esq.
        Matthew M. Roose, Esq.
        1211 Avenue of the Americas
        New York, NY 10036-8704
        Telephone: (212) 596-9000
        Facsimile: (212) 596-9090
        E-mail: mark.somerstein@ropesgray.com  
                matthew.roose@ropesgray.com

                       - and -

        NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP
        Louis R. Strubeck, Jr., Esq.
        Jason L. Boland, Esq.
        2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 3600
        Dallas, TX 75201-7932
        Telephone: (214) 855-8000
        Facsimile: (214) 855-8200  
        E-mail: louis.strubeck@nortonrosefulbright.com
                jason.boland@nortonrosefulbright.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing is available at Pacermonitor.com at



http://bankrupt.com/misc/Weatherford_International_275_Rule2019.pdf

http://bankrupt.com/misc/Weatherford_International_Exhibit_275_Rule2019.pdf
  
                      About Weatherford

Weatherford (NYSE: WFT), an Irish public limited company and Swiss
tax resident -- http://www.weatherford.com/-- is a multinational
oilfield service company providing innovative solutions, technology
and services to the oil and gas industry. The Company operates in
over 80 countries and has a network of approximately 650 locations,
including manufacturing, service, research and development and
training facilities and employs approximately 26,000 people.

Weatherford reported a net loss attributable to the company of
$2.81 billion for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net
loss attributable to the company of $2.81 billion for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017.  

As of March 31, 2019, Weatherford had $6.51 billion in total
assets, $10.62 billion in total liabilities, and a total
shareholders' deficiency of $4.10 billion.

On July 1, 2019, Weatherford International plc, Weatherford
International, LLC, and Weatherford International Ltd. sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 19-33694).

Thbe Hon. David R. Jones is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Latham & Watkins
LLP as counsel; Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC as financial
advisor; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC as investment banker; and Prime
Clerk LLC as claims agent.

Henry Hobbs Jr., acting U.S. trustee for Region 7, on July 17,
2019, appointed three creditors to serve on the official committee
of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases.


WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC: Ruling Against R. Lightsey, J. Cook Upheld
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned Westinghouse Electric Co., Debtor,
Richard Lightsey and Jessica Cook, Appellants, v. Westinghouse
Electric Co., LLC and Statutory Unsecured Claimholders Committee.
Appellees, No. 18-CV-1786 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y.), District Judge Alison
J. Nathan affirmed the Bankruptcy Court's decision denying
Appellants Richard Lightsey and Jessica Cook's request for relief
from the automatic stay.

The question before this Court on appeal is whether the bankruptcy
court erred in determining that Appellants' claims against
Westinghouse were pre-petition claims subject to the automatic stay
notwithstanding the fact that the V.C. Summer Project was abandoned
after Westinghouse's Chapter 11 petition was filed.

Appellants' claims arise out of both (a) their pre-petition payment
of extra utility fees in advance to the V.C. Summer Owners, which
fees were allegedly then paid to Westinghouse and (b) the V.C.
Summer Owners' post-petition abandonment of the V.C. Summer
Project, which Appellants contend was caused by Westinghouse's
post-petition rejection of its contracts with the V.C. Summer
Owners.

The Bankruptcy Court determined that Appellants' claims were
pre-petition because "all of the things that created the
obligations and resulted in the charges"--"construction agreements
that were entered into pre-petition, cost obligations that were
incurred pre-petition, apparently approvals of rate changes that
happened pre-petition that were designed to allow the utility to
defray the costs"-- were "pre-bankruptcy events." When "[t]he
monies [Appellants were] seeking to recover were all pre-bankruptcy
under a pre-bankruptcy arrangement and a pre-bankruptcy set of
circumstances," the fact that the project was abandoned "during
bankruptcy [did not] give [Appellants] a post-petition claim." Put
differently, "all of the unjust enrichment happened
pre-bankruptcy," and Appellants only concluded it was unjust once
the project ended post-petition.

Appellants challenge this conclusion, emphasizing that their claims
only arose as a result of the post-petition abandonment of the V.C.
Summer Project; without that abandonment, they represent that they
would have had no reason to assert a claim against Westinghouse for
the funds received for construction of the project. Accordingly,
they analogize their claims to the conversion claims the Enron
court deemed post-petition, notwithstanding the fact that they
arose out of a pre-petition contract; and the independent causes of
action against New GM the Matter of Motors court deemed
post-petition notwithstanding their connection to faulty ignition
switches manufactured pre-petition.

Appellants further argue that their claims must be post-petition
because the only conduct of Westinghouse's that the Appellants
complained of was its post-petition termination of the V.C. Summer
Project. Reading the case law to stand for the proposition that
"the focus is on when the debtor's conduct occurs," Appellants
contend that Westinghouse's post-petition conduct renders their
claim a post-petition claim.

The Court finds these arguments unpersuasive for several reasons.
As an initial matter, the fact that a party would have no reason to
assert a claim until the occurrence of a future event does not mean
that the claim is post-petition. It is instead fully consistent
with its classification as a contingent claim.

Further, Appellant's focus on the timing of the debtor's conduct is
an unconvincing read of precedent. While Appellant may be correct
that the examples in the case law can accurately be classified as
pre- or post-petition depending upon when the debtor's primary
conduct took place, Appellant identifies no authority for its
contention that the timing of its conduct is the "focus" in the
analysis. To the contrary, as the Second Circuit explained in
Matter of Motors, the focus is on whether there is sufficient
contact or relationship between the debtor and the claimants such
that the claimant is identifiable. In this case, utility customers
were easily identifiable prior to the petition date based upon the
separate fees assessed on their utility bills. To use the language
of the Chateaugay court, the future event of the project's
abandonment "was within the actual or presumed contemplation" of
the utility customers and the debtor "at the time the original
relationship between the parties was created."

Moreover, as the bankruptcy court explained in Enron, the logic of
permitting post-petition torts to overcome the expansive notion of
a claim otherwise applicable in bankruptcy law is to avoid
penalizing post-petition dealing with the debtor, particularly when
the debtor is attempting to manage its business to protect the
interest of its claimants. Here, in contrast, all of the relevant
dealings with the debtor occurred prior to the petition date, and
there are no allegations that the utility customers relied in any
respect on Westinghouse's limited continued operations.

A copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 27, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2zhbG9M from Leagle.com.

Richard Lightsey & Jessica Cook, Appellants, represented by David
L. Rosendorf, Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton LLP, Joseph Preston
Strom, Strom Law Firm & Terry E. Richardson, Jr., Richardson,
Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman, L.L.C.

Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, Appellee, represented by Edward
Soto, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, L.L.P., Garrett Avery Fail, Weil,
Gotshal & Manges LLP, Gary Todd Holtzer, Weil, Gotshal & Manges
LLP, Robert Scher Berezin, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP & Robert
Justin Lemons, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP.

Statutory Unsecured Claimholders Committee, Appellee, represented
by David A. Picon, Proskauer Rose LLP, Martin J. Bienenstock, Dewey
& LeBoeuf, L.L.P., Timothy Quaid Karcher, Proskauer Rose LLP &
Vincent Indelicato, Proskauer Rose LLP.

                About Westinghouse Electric

Westinghouse Electric Company LLC --
http://www.westinghousenuclear.com/-- is a U.S.-based nuclear
power company founded in 1999 that provides design work and
start-up help for new nuclear power plants and makes many of the
components.  Westinghouse manufactures and supplies the commercial
fuel products needed to run the plants, and it offers training,
engineering, maintenance, and quality management services.  Almost
50% of nuclear power plants around the world and about 60% of U.S.
plants are based on Westinghouse's technology.  Westinghouse's
world headquarters are located in the Pittsburgh suburb of
Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania.

On Oct. 16, 2006, Westinghouse Electric was sold for $5.4 billion
to a group comprising of Toshiba (77% share), partners The Shaw
Group (20% share), and Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co.
Ltd. (3% share).  After purchasing part of Shaw's stake in 2013,
Japan-based conglomerate Toshiba obtained ownership of 87% of
Westinghouse.

Amid cost overruns at U.S. nuclear reactors it was building,
Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, along with 29 affiliates, filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-10751) on March 29,
2017.  The petitions were signed by AlixPartners' Lisa J. Donahue,
the Debtors' chief transition and development officer.

The Debtors disclosed total assets of $4.32 billion and total
liabilities of $9.39 billion as of Feb. 28, 2017.

The Hon. Michael E. Wiles presides over the cases.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP serves as counsel to the Debtors.  The
Debtors hired AlixPartners LLP as financial advisor; PJT Partners
Inc. as investment banker; Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as
claims and noticing agent; K&L Gates as special counsel; and KPMG
LLP as tax consultant and accounting and financial reporting
advisor.

The Debtors retained PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent
auditor and tax services provider to perform audit services in
connection with Toshiba Nuclear Energy Holdings (US) Inc. and
Toshiba Nuclear Energy Holdings (UK) Ltd.

Toshiba Nuclear Energy Holdings (UK) Ltd. is represented by Albert
Togut, Esq., Brian F. Moore, Esq., and Kyle J. Ortiz, Esq., at
Togut, Segal & Segal LLP.

The Board of Directors of Westinghouse appointed a special panel
called the U.S. AP1000 Committee to oversee the company's
activities related to certain AP1000 nuclear plants located in
Georgia and South Carolina.

On April 7, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Proskauer Rose LLP is
the committee's bankruptcy counsel, and Houlihan Lokey Capital,
Inc., serves as its investment banker.


YUMA ENERGY: Incurs $3.96 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
Yuma Energy, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss attributable
to common stockholders of $3.96 million on $1.66 million of
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to a
net loss attributable to common stockholders of $4.40 million on
$5.82 million of revenues for the three months ended June 30,
2018.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company reported a net
loss attributable to common stockholders of $20 million on $5.64
million of revenues compared to a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $7.94 million on $11.47 million of revenues for the
same period during the prior year.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $63.54 million in total
assets, $46.44 million in total current liabilities, $14.69 million
in total other noncurrent liabilities, and $2.40 million in total
stockholders' equity.

                   Liquidity and Going Concern

The Company said certain factors and uncertainties which include,
but are not limited to, declines in the Company's production, the
Company's failure to establish commercial production on its Permian
properties, no available capital to maintain and develop its
properties, and its substantial working capital deficit of
approximately $41 million, raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern for the twelve
months following the issuance of these financial statements.  The
consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going
concern basis of accounting, which contemplates continuity of
operations, realization of assets, and satisfaction of liabilities
and commitments in the normal course of business.  The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of the going concern uncertainty.

On Oct. 26, 2016, the Company and three of its subsidiaries, as the
co-borrowers, entered into a credit agreement providing for a $75.0
million three-year senior secured revolving credit facility with
Societe Generale, as administrative agent, SG Americas Securities,
LLC, as lead arranger and bookrunner, and the lenders signatory
thereto.

The credit facility was $32.8 million as of June 30, 2019, and the
Company was, and is, fully drawn, leaving no availability on the
line of credit.  All of the obligations under the Credit Agreement,
and the guarantees of those obligations, are secured by
substantially all of the Company's assets.

The Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants that, among
other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the
Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness, create liens on
assets, make investments, enter into sale and leaseback
transactions, pay dividends and distributions or repurchase its
capital stock, engage in mergers or consolidations, sell certain
assets, sell or discount any notes receivable or accounts
receivable, and engage in certain transactions with affiliates.

The Credit Agreement contains customary financial and affirmative
covenants and defines events of default for credit facilities of
this type, including failure to pay principal or interest, breach
of covenants, breach of representations and warranties, insolvency,
judgment default, and a change of control.  Upon the occurrence and
continuance of an event of default, the Lender has the right to
accelerate repayment of the loans and exercise its remedies with
respect to the collateral.

The Company is not in compliance under the credit facility with its
(i) total debt to EBITDAX covenant for the trailing four quarter
period, (ii) current ratio covenant, (iii) EBITDAX to interest
expense covenant for the trailing four quarter period, (iv) the
liquidity covenant requiring the Company to maintain unrestricted
cash and borrowing base availability of at least $4.0 million, and
(v) obligation to make interest only payments. The Company
currently is not making any payments of interest under the credit
facility and anticipates future non-compliance under the credit
facility for the foreseeable future until the Company effects a
restructuring of its debt obligations. Due to this non-compliance,
as well as the credit facility maturity in 2019, the Company
classified its entire bank debt as a current liability in its
financial statements as of June 30, 2019.  On Oct. 9, 2018, the
Company received a notice and reservation of rights from the
administrative agent under the Credit Agreement advising that an
event of default had occurred and continues to exist by reason of
the Company's noncompliance with the liquidity covenant requiring
the Company to maintain cash and cash equivalents and borrowing
base availability of at least $4.0 million.  As a result of the
default, the Lender may accelerate the outstanding balance under
the Credit Agreement, increase the applicable interest rate by 2.0%
per annum or commence foreclosure on the collateral securing the
loans.  As of Aug. 16, 2019, the Lender has not accelerated the
outstanding amount due and payable on the loans, increased the
applicable interest rate or commenced foreclosure proceedings, but
may exercise one or more of these remedies in the future.  As
required under the Credit Agreement, the Company previously entered
into hedging arrangements with SocGen and BP Energy Company
pursuant to International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master
Agreements.

On March 14, 2019, the Company received a notice of an event of
default under its ISDA Agreement with SocGen.  Due to the default
under the ISDA Agreement, SocGen unwound all of the Company's
hedges with them.  The notice provides for a payment of $335,252 to
settle the Company's outstanding obligations thereunder related to
SocGen's hedges, which is included in current maturities of debt at
June 30, 2019.  On March 19, 2019, the Company received a notice of
an event of default under its ISDA Agreement with BP.  Due to the
default under the ISDA Agreement, BP also unwound all of the
Company's hedges with them.  The notice provides for a payment of
$749,240 to settle the Company's outstanding obligations thereunder
related to BP's hedges, which is included in current maturities of
debt at June 30, 2019.

During the first quarter of 2019, the Company agreed to sell its
Kern County, California properties, and closed on the sale in April
2019 for net proceeds of approximately $1.7 million.  As additional
consideration for the sale of the assets, if WTI Index for oil
equals or exceeds $65 in the six months following closing and
maintains that average for twelve consecutive months then the buyer
agreed to pay the Company an additional $250,000.  Net proceeds of
approximately $1.2 million were used for the repayment of
borrowings under the credit facility, and approximately $500,000
was retained by the Company for working capital purposes.

The Company has initiated several strategic alternatives to
mitigate its limited liquidity (defined as cash on hand and undrawn
borrowing base), its financial covenant compliance issues, and to
provide it with additional working capital to develop its existing
assets.

On Oct. 22, 2018, the Company retained Seaport Global Securities
LLC, an investment banking firm, to advise the Company on its
strategic and tactical alternatives, including possible
acquisitions and divestitures.  On March 1, 2019, the Company hired
a chief restructuring officer, and subsequently on March 28, 2019,
appointed that person as interim chief executive officer.

The Company continues to reduce its operating and general and
administrative costs and has curtailed its planned 2019 capital
expenditures.

The Company plans to take further steps to mitigate its limited
liquidity, which may include, but are not limited to, restructuring
its existing debt; selling additional assets; further reducing
general and administrative expenses; seeking merger and acquisition
related opportunities; and potentially raising proceeds from
capital markets transactions, including the sale of debt or equity
securities.  There can be no assurance that the exploration of
strategic alternatives will result in a transaction or otherwise
improve the Company's limited liquidity and that the Company will
continue as a going concern.

              Operational and Corporate Update

Yuma Energy provided an operational and corporate update and
reported its 2019 second quarter financial results.  During the
second quarter, the Company has taken significant steps to arrest
the recent declines of its daily production.  Specifically, the
Company successfully installed a new jet pump on the Nettles 39-1
well, resulting in approximately 40 barrels a day of gross oil
(bbl/d) or 15 bbl/d net production, up from 10 bbl/d gross prior to
the workover.  The Company also repaired the gravel pack on the
State Lease 18194 well which has produced approximately 140 bbl/d
gross, or 60 bbl/d net, for the most recent two weeks. Prior to the
workover, the well was producing 90 bbl/d gross.  The Company
continues to diligently review its operations and evaluate
opportunities to improve production where those activities result
in short payback periods.

The Company also continues to reduce its operating and general and
administrative costs and has significantly curtailed its planned
2019 capital expenditures.  The Company plans to take further steps
to mitigate its limited liquidity, which may include, but are not
limited to, restructuring its existing debt; selling additional
assets; further reducing general and administrative expenses;
seeking merger and acquisition related opportunities and
potentially raising proceeds from capital markets transactions,
including the sale of debt or equity securities.

Discussions regarding the restructuring of the Company and its debt
are ongoing, and management is hopeful that an accord can be
reached.  Management continues to work with Seaport Global
Securities LLC, an investment banking firm, which advises the
Company on its strategic alternatives and is engaged in various
discussions regarding its debt, potential acquisitions and other
initiatives generally considered part of the restructuring
process.

Management Comments
Mr. Anthony C. Schnur, interim chief executive officer and chief
restructuring officer stated, "We are pleased that the field work
conducted to date has increased our production at certain wells and
are high-grading additional activities to further improve our
production.  On the restructuring front, while the process is
taking some time, we have been engaged in in various discussions.
However, a substantial risk exists that the Company will be unable
to reach agreements on key issues related to our outstanding
indebtedness which will continue to impair our ability to move the
Company forward.  The Yuma team continues to work toward a workable
solution for all of the stakeholders of your Company."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                       https://is.gd/XlAsFt

                        About Yuma Energy

Yuma Energy, Inc. -- http://www.yumaenergyinc.com/-- is an
independent Houston-based exploration and production company
focused on acquiring, developing and exploring for conventional and
unconventional oil and natural gas resources.  Historically, the
Company's activities have focused on inland and onshore properties,
primarily located in central and southern Louisiana and
southeastern Texas.  Its common stock is listed on the NYSE
American under the trading symbol "YUMA."

Yuma Energy reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders
of $17.07 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a
net loss attributable to common stockholders of $6.80 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of March 31, 2019, Yuma Energy
had $66.53 million in total assets, $45.84 million in total current
liabilities, $14.68 million in total other non-current liabilities,
and $5.99 million in total stockholders' equity.

Moss Adams LLP, in Houston, Texas, the Company's auditor since
2017, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 2, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company is in
default on its credit facility, has a substantial working capital
deficit, has no available capital to maintain or develop its
properties and all hedging agreements have been terminated by
counterparties.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from August 19 to 23, 2019
---------------------------------------------------------

  Company                    Ticker  Coupon Bid Price   Maturity
  -------                    ------  ------ ---------   --------
Acosta Inc                   ACOSTA   7.750    13.694  10/1/2022
Acosta Inc                   ACOSTA   7.750    14.379  10/1/2022
Alta Mesa Holdings LP /
  Alta Mesa Finance
  Services Corp              ALTMES   7.875    22.106 12/15/2024
Approach Resources Inc       AREX     7.000    23.338  6/15/2021
BPZ Resources Inc            BPZR     6.500     3.017   3/1/2049
BPZ Resources Inc            BPZR     6.500     3.017   3/1/2015
Bon-Ton Department
  Stores Inc/The             BONT     8.000    10.375  6/15/2021
Bristow Group Inc            BRS      6.250    19.500 10/15/2022
Bristow Group Inc            BRS      4.500    19.500   6/1/2023
California Resources Corp    CRC      5.500    55.798  9/15/2021
Cenveo Corp                  CVO      8.500     1.346  9/15/2022
Cenveo Corp                  CVO      8.500     1.346  9/15/2022
Cenveo Corp                  CVO      6.000     0.894  5/15/2024
Chukchansi Economic
  Development Authority      CHUKCH   9.750    60.000  5/30/2020
Chukchansi Economic
  Development Authority      CHUKCH  10.250    60.000  5/30/2020
Cloud Peak Energy
  Resources LLC / Cloud
  Peak Energy Finance Corp   CLD     12.000    27.750  11/1/2021
Cloud Peak Energy
  Resources LLC / Cloud
  Peak Energy Finance Corp   CLD      6.375     1.100  3/15/2024
Constellation Brands Inc     STZ      3.875   100.208 11/15/2019
Continental Airlines
  2004-ERJ1 Pass
  Through Trust              UAL      9.558    98.792   9/1/2019
DFC Finance Corp             DLLR    10.500    67.125  6/15/2020
DFC Finance Corp             DLLR    10.500    67.125  6/15/2020
Denbury Resources Inc        DNR      4.625    33.175  7/15/2023
Denbury Resources Inc        DNR      5.500    42.206   5/1/2022
EP Energy LLC / Everest
  Acquisition Finance Inc    EPENEG   8.000     9.569  2/15/2025
EP Energy LLC / Everest
  Acquisition Finance Inc    EPENEG   9.375    20.741   5/1/2024
EP Energy LLC / Everest
  Acquisition Finance Inc    EPENEG   6.375     0.465  6/15/2023
EP Energy LLC / Everest
  Acquisition Finance Inc    EPENEG   9.375    20.673   5/1/2024
EP Energy LLC / Everest
  Acquisition Finance Inc    EPENEG   8.000     9.656  2/15/2025
Energy Conversion
  Devices Inc                ENER     3.000     7.875  6/15/2013
Federal Farm Credit Banks    FFCB     2.320    99.413  5/18/2022
Federal Farm Credit Banks    FFCB     2.390    99.642 12/27/2022
Federal Farm Credit Banks    FFCB     2.320    99.674 11/28/2022
Federal Farm Credit Banks    FFCB     2.300    99.483  9/14/2022
Federal Farm Credit Banks    FFCB     2.270    99.532 11/23/2022
Federal Farm Credit Banks    FFCB     2.340    99.486   2/1/2023
Federal Home Loan Banks      FHLB     2.495    99.433  5/28/2020
Federal Home Loan Banks      FHLB     2.680    99.621  3/30/2026
Federal Home Loan Banks      FHLB     3.640    99.449  5/30/2034
Federal Home Loan Banks      FHLB     3.000    99.267 11/26/2036
Federal Home Loan Banks      FHLB     2.480    99.677  1/25/2023
Federal Home Loan
  Mortgage Corp              FHLMC    2.900    99.795  5/28/2024
Ferrellgas Partners LP /
  Ferrellgas Partners
  Finance Corp               FGP      8.625    75.071  6/15/2020
Fleetwood Enterprises Inc    FLTW    14.000     3.557 12/15/2011
Foresight Energy LLC /
  Foresight Energy
  Finance Corp               FELP    11.500    38.173   4/1/2023
Foresight Energy LLC /
  Foresight Energy
  Finance Corp               FELP    11.500    38.096   4/1/2023
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR     10.500    52.033  9/15/2022
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR      8.500    62.459  4/15/2020
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR      6.250    52.543  9/15/2021
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR      8.750    50.121  4/15/2022
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR      9.250    54.517   7/1/2021
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR      8.875    55.851  9/15/2020
Goldman Sachs
  Group Inc/The              GS       3.000    99.762  3/27/2020
Grizzly Energy LLC           VNR      9.000     6.000  2/15/2024
Grizzly Energy LLC           VNR      9.000     6.000  2/15/2024
Halcon Resources Corp        HKUS     6.750    14.000  2/15/2025
Halcon Resources Corp        HKUS     6.750    15.800  2/15/2025
Halcon Resources Corp        HKUS     6.750    15.750  2/15/2025
Halcon Resources Corp        HKUS     6.750    11.500  2/15/2025
Halcon Resources Corp        HKUS     6.750    15.750  2/15/2025
High Ridge Brands Co         HIRIDG   8.875     8.801  3/15/2025
High Ridge Brands Co         HIRIDG   8.875     8.801  3/15/2025
Hornbeck Offshore
  Services Inc               HOS      5.875    54.164   4/1/2020
Hornbeck Offshore
  Services Inc               HOS      5.000    47.649   3/1/2021
Hornbeck Offshore
  Services Inc               HOS      1.500    95.500   9/1/2019
JC Penney Corp Inc           JCP      6.900     7.980  8/15/2026
Legacy Reserves LP /
  Legacy Reserves
  Finance Corp               LGCY     8.000     3.690  12/1/2020
Legacy Reserves LP /
  Legacy Reserves
  Finance Corp               LGCY     6.625     3.984  12/1/2021
Legacy Reserves LP /
  Legacy Reserves
  Finance Corp               LGCY     8.000     3.500  9/20/2023
Lehman Brothers Inc          LEH      7.500     1.847   8/1/2026
MAI Holdings Inc             MAIHLD   9.500    45.000   6/1/2023
MF Global Holdings Ltd       MF       9.000    14.750  6/20/2038
MF Global Holdings Ltd       MF       6.750    14.750   8/8/2016
MModal Inc                   MODL    10.750     6.125  8/15/2020
Mashantucket Western
  Pequot Tribe               MASHTU   7.350    16.250   7/1/2026
Morgan Stanley               MS       4.520    99.300   9/1/2019
Murray Energy Corp           MURREN  11.250    19.969  4/15/2021
Murray Energy Corp           MURREN  11.250    20.071  4/15/2021
Murray Energy Corp           MURREN   9.500    16.750  12/5/2020
Murray Energy Corp           MURREN   9.500    16.750  12/5/2020
NWH Escrow Corp              HARDWD   7.500    60.000   8/1/2021
NWH Escrow Corp              HARDWD   7.500    58.912   8/1/2021
Neiman Marcus Group
  LTD LLC / Neiman
  Marcus Group LLC /
  Mariposa Borrower /
  NMG                        NMG      8.000    32.746 10/25/2024
Neiman Marcus Group
  LTD LLC / Neiman
  Marcus Group LLC /
  Mariposa Borrower /
  NMG                        NMG      8.750    33.235 10/25/2024
Neiman Marcus Group
  LTD LLC / Neiman
  Marcus Group LLC /
  Mariposa Borrower /
  NMG                        NMG      8.750    34.355 10/25/2024
New Gulf Resources
  LLC/NGR Finance Corp       NGREFN  12.250     4.000  5/15/2019
New WEI Inc                  WLTG     8.500     0.834  4/15/2021
Northwest Hardwoods Inc      HARDWD   7.500    58.005   8/1/2021
Northwest Hardwoods Inc      HARDWD   7.500    58.005   8/1/2021
Pernix Therapeutics
  Holdings Inc               PTX      4.250     2.250   4/1/2021
Pernix Therapeutics
  Holdings Inc               PTX      4.250     2.250   4/1/2021
Pioneer Energy
  Services Corp              PESX     6.125    37.907  3/15/2022
Powerwave Technologies Inc   PWAV     1.875     0.023 11/15/2024
Renco Metals Inc             RENCO   11.500    24.875   7/1/2003
Rolta LLC                    RLTAIN  10.750     8.179  5/16/2018
Sable Permian Resources
  Land LLC / AEPB
  Finance Corp               AMEPER   8.000    43.500  6/15/2020
Sable Permian Resources
  Land LLC / AEPB
  Finance Corp               AMEPER   7.375     7.500  11/1/2021
Sable Permian Resources
  Land LLC / AEPB
  Finance Corp               AMEPER   7.125    17.250  11/1/2020
Sable Permian Resources
  Land LLC / AEPB
  Finance Corp               AMEPER   8.000    42.610  6/15/2020
Sable Permian Resources
  Land LLC / AEPB
  Finance Corp               AMEPER   7.125     8.621  11/1/2020
Sable Permian Resources
  Land LLC / AEPB
  Finance Corp               AMEPER   7.375     7.221  11/1/2021
Sanchez Energy Corp          SNEC     6.125     4.500  1/15/2023
Sanchez Energy Corp          SNEC     7.750     5.750  6/15/2021
SandRidge Energy Inc         SD       7.500     0.500  2/15/2023
Sears Holdings Corp          SHLD     6.625     7.200 10/15/2018
Sears Holdings Corp          SHLD     6.625     7.170 10/15/2018
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp            SHLD     7.500     1.000 10/15/2027
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp            SHLD     6.500     1.000  12/1/2028
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp            SHLD     6.750     1.000  1/15/2028
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp            SHLD     7.000     1.053   6/1/2032
Sempra Texas Holdings Corp   TXU      5.550    13.500 11/15/2014
Sempra Texas Holdings Corp   TXU      9.750    93.750 10/15/2019
Stearns Holdings LLC         STELND   9.375    49.969  8/15/2020
Stearns Holdings LLC         STELND   9.375    49.969  8/15/2020
Tapstone Energy LLC /
  Tapstone Energy
  Finance Corp               TAPENE   9.750    66.250   6/1/2022
Tapstone Energy LLC /
  Tapstone Energy
  Finance Corp               TAPENE   9.750    41.400   6/1/2022
TerraVia Holdings Inc        TVIA     6.000     4.644   2/1/2018
Transworld Systems Inc       TSIACQ   9.500    26.000  8/15/2021
Transworld Systems Inc       TSIACQ   9.500    26.000  8/15/2021
UCI International LLC        UCII     8.625     4.780  2/15/2019
Ultra Resources Inc          UPL      6.875     7.901  4/15/2022
Ultra Resources Inc          UPL      7.125     7.986  4/15/2025
Ultra Resources Inc          UPL      6.875     8.487  4/15/2022
Ultra Resources Inc          UPL      7.125     7.986  4/15/2025
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp    WIN      7.500    29.500   6/1/2022
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp    WIN      6.375    25.625   8/1/2023
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp    WIN      8.750    26.182 12/15/2024
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp    WIN      6.375    28.563   8/1/2023
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp    WIN      8.750    29.500 12/15/2024
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp    WIN      7.750    19.728 10/15/2020
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp    WIN      7.750    19.526  10/1/2021
Worthington Industries Inc   WOR      6.500   102.089  4/15/2020
rue21 inc                    RUE      9.000     1.428 10/15/2021



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2019.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***