/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/190830.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Friday, August 30, 2019, Vol. 23, No. 241

                            Headlines

1989 3AVE: Seeks to Hire Chase Global Realty as Real Estate Broker
1989 3AVE: Seeks to Hire Interior Development as Consultant
41-23 HAIGHT STREET: Trustee Seeks to Hire Accountant
41-23 HAIGHT STREET: Trustee Taps LaMonica Herbst as Counsel
A'GACI LLC: Seeks to Hire Eric Terry Law as Legal Counsel

ACE EDUCATION: Seeks to Hire Brannen Firm as Legal Counsel
AERO-MARINE: Seeks to Hire Tall Pines Realty as Real Estate Broker
ALMANOR LAKEFRONT: Taps Macdonald Fernandez as Legal Counsel
AMYRIS INC: Further Modifies 2019 Cash Bonus Plan
ANKUR INVESTMENT: Taps Grasl PLC as Legal Counsel

ASP MCS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'CCC' on Weak Operating Results
AVENUE STORES: Taps Malfitano Advisors as Asset Disposition Advisor
BELEAVE INC: Seeks to Postpone Release of Q1 Financial Statements
BETTERU EDUCATION: Delays Annual Filings, Granted MCTO
BORDEAUX FARMS: Court Approves Disclosure Statement

C.M. MEIERS: Trustee Taps Jenkins Mulligan as Legal Counsel
CASCADE FAMILY: Unsecureds to Get Full Payment From Earnings
CELADON GROUP: Hires Former Swift Transportation CEO as CTO
CENTINELA VALLEY: Sept. 26 Disclosure Statement Hearing
CHARITABLE OCCASION: Court Approves Disclosure Statement

CHARTER SCHOOL OF EDUCATIONAL: S&P Cuts Rev. Bond Rating to 'BB'
COCRYSTAL PHARMA: Incurs $1.51 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
COMFORT DENTAL STUDIO: Renews Request to Access Cash Collateral
CONSIS INTERNATIONAL: Creditors Object to Disclosure Statement
DASHCO INC: Case Summary & 15 Unsecured Creditors

DITECH HOLDING: Court Denies Confirmation of Plan
DITECH HOLDING: Ombudsman Recommends Sale of Assets, Loans
DIVERSE LABEL: Committee Opposes Settlement of Cargill Claims
DLJ INVESTMENTS: Oct. 2 Plan Confirmation Hearing
EPIC COMPANIES: In Chapter 11 to Sell to White Oak, Alliance

EPIC COMPANIES: Seeks Dismissal of Involuntary Chapter 7
F-SQUARED INVESTMENT: Trustee Appeal Nixed for Lack of Jurisdiction
FALCON V: Sept. 30 Plan Confirmation Hearing
FC GLOBAL: Change of Auditor Causes 10-Q Filing Delay
FC GLOBAL: Changes Its Name to "Gadsden Properties, Inc."

FIRST BAPTIST HOUSING: Sept. 10 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
FOREVER 21: Reportedly Preparing for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
FOX VALLEY PRO: Seeks to Hire Kerkman & Dunn as Legal Counsel
FRESH MARKET: Moody's Alters Outlook on Caa2 CFR to Stable
FUELCELL ENERGY: Names Jason Few as New President and CEO

FUSION CONNECT: Committee Taps AlixPartners as Financial Advisor
FUSION CONNECT: Committee Taps Cooley as Legal Counsel
FUSION CONNECT: Taps EisnerAmper as Auditor
FUSION CONNECT: Taps Grant Thornton as Advisor
FUSION CONNECT: Taps KPMG LLP as Tax Consultant

FUSION CONNECT: Taps PwC as Tax Consultant
FYRE FESTIVAL: Models, Musicians Face Suits Over Festival Payments
GB SCIENCES: Delays Filing of Second Quarter Form 10-Q
GLOBAL EAGLE: Incurs $38.5 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
GREEN PHARMACEUTICALS: Unsecureds to Get $54K Under Plan

GREENSTREET LLC: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
GUARDIAN EXTERIORS: Court Conditionally Approves Plan Disclosures
HILCORP ENERGY I: Moody's Reviews Ba1 CFR for Downgrade
HY-TECH PLUMBING: Sept. 24 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
JAGUAR HEALTH: Bryan Ezralow Has 4.3% Stake as of Aug. 13

JOE'S PLACE: Obtains Conditional Approval of Disclosure Statement
KLINE CONSTRUCTION: Sept. 5 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
LARRY CARR & ASSOCIATES: Oct. 9 Plan Confirmation Hearing
LB STEEL: Court Conditionally Approves Disclosure Statement
LIBERTYVILLE IMAGING: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors

LITCHFIELD LASER: Court to Confirm Modified 2nd Amended Plan
LNB-015-13 LLC: Court Denies Approval of Disclosure Statement
MAGNUM CONSTRUCTION: U.S. Trustee Object to Disclosures
MAXCOM USA: Sept. 17 Plan Confirmation, Disclosures OK Hearing
MEG ENERGY: Fitch Affirms B LT IDR & Alters Outlook to Positive

MRI OF LIBERTYVILLE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
NATURAL PRODUCTS: Sept. 6 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
NELSON-WADE MANAGEMENT: Seeks Authority to Use Cash Collateral
NORTHSTAR ALARM: Modified Deal in Smothers Suit Has Prelim Approval
PALM BEACH BRAIN: Seeks to Hire Kelley Fulton as Legal Counsel

PARKINSON SEED: Trustee Hires Huber Erickson as Accountant
PDC ENERGY: S&P Puts 'BB-' ICR on Watch Positive on SRC Energy Deal
PEABODY ENERGY: Counties, City Appellants Enjoined from Prosecuting
PHILADELPHIA AUTHORITY: S&P Cuts 2016A Rev. Bond Rating to BB+
PITNEY BOWES: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms 'BB+' Rating

PMHC II: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'CCC+' on Unsustainable Debt Levels
PORTAGE BIOTECH: Delays Interim Filings, OSC Issues FFCTO
POWER SOLUTIONS: Appoints Guogang Wu as Replacement Director
POWER SOLUTIONS: Delays Filing of Second Quarter Form 10-Q
PROFESSIONAL FLOOR: Sept. 25 Plan Confirmation Hearing

PROGISTIC CARRIERS: Seeks to Hire JS Whitworth as Legal Counsel
R & C PROPERTIES: Unsecureds to Get Full Payment Over 90 Days
RANGE RESOURCES: S&P Cuts ICR to 'BB' on Weak Natural Gas Prices
REAGOR-DYKES: Ford Motor Credit Still Has Issues With Plan
REALTY CAPITAL: Sept. 19 Hearing on Disclosure Statement

REIHNER ENTERPRISES: Unsecured Creditors to Get 25% Over 5 Years
RESOLUTE FOREST: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms 'BB-' ICR
REWALK ROBOTICS: Incurs $4.6 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
REYNOLDS DEVELOPMENT: Seeks to Hire Wolfe Snowden as Counsel
RONEXPRESS INC: Seeks to Hire A+ Accounting and Tax as Accountant

SACRAMENTO COUNTY HOUSING: S&P Cuts 2000B Rev. Bond Rating to 'BB-'
SANCHEZ ENERGY: Sept. 9 Common Stock Transfer Hearing Set
SANCHEZ ENERGY: U.S. Trustee Forms 7-Member Committee
SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms BB ICR
SHALE SUPPORT: Sept. 18 Disclosure Statement Hearing

SKY-SKAN INC: Coastal Capital, DoL Object to Disclosure Statement
SKYFUEL INC: Committee Hires Kutner Brinen as Legal Counsel
SNEED SHIPBUILDING: Ch. 11 Trustee Files Plan of Liquidation
SOVRANO LLC: Equity Bank, Franchisees Object to Plan Disclosures
SRC ENERGY: S&P Puts 'B' ICR on Watch Positive on PDC Energy Deal

SYNCREON AUTOMOTIVE: Gets Canadian Recognition of UK Proceedings
TAMARA HOME: Seeks to Hire Batista Law as Legal Counsel
TENDERLEAF VILLAGE: Nov. 6 Plan Confirmation Hearing
U.S. PIPE: Ct. Rules in Favor of Trustees in Coal Act Claims
UNIQUE TOOL: Seeks to Hire Maynard Industries as Auctioneer

UNITED AIRLINES: Fitch Affirms BB IDR, Outlook Stable
VELMO USA: Seeks to Hire Kaplan Johnson as Legal Counsel
WAFTA PROPERTIES: Rental Payments to Fund Plan Distributions
WEATHERFORD INT'L: Ropes, Norton Update Official Committee
XTL INC: Seeks to Hire Gehling Osborn Law as Special Counsel

YUMA ENERGY: Receives Second Notice of Noncompliance from NYSE
[^] BOOK REVIEW: Bendix-Martin Marietta Takeover War

                            *********

1989 3AVE: Seeks to Hire Chase Global Realty as Real Estate Broker
------------------------------------------------------------------
1989 3Ave LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of New York to employ Chase Global Realty
Corp. as its real estate broker in connection with a potential sale
of real property located at 1985 and 1987 3 Avenue, New York, New
York (Block 1659, Lots 1&2) to Sunny Sycamore LLC as of April 12,
2019 nunc pro tunc.

The Debtor has agreed to pay Chase 2.5% of the selling price.

Ching Gu Chen of Chase Global Realty Corp. assures the court that
his firm neither holds nor represents any interests adverse to the
Debtor's estate and is a "disinterested person" within the meaning
of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The broker can be reached through:

      Ching Gu Chen
      Chase Global Realty Corp.
      140-75 Ash Ave, Suite 2E
      Flushing, NY 11355
      Phone: 718-355-8788

                  About 1989 3Ave

Based in Elmhurst, New York, 1989 3Ave, LLC, a privately held
company engaged in activities related to real estate, filed a
voluntary Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-47234)
on Dec. 19, 2018.  In the petition signed by Bo Jin Zhu, manager,
the Debtor disclosed assets totaling $23,000,106 and liabilities
totaling $24,761,785.  The case is assigned to Hon. Nancy Hershey
Lord.  William X. Zou, Esq., in Flushing, New York, is the Debtor's
counsel.


1989 3AVE: Seeks to Hire Interior Development as Consultant
-----------------------------------------------------------
1989 3Ave LLC seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of New York to employ Interior Development
Consulting LLC as its consultant in connection with its affairs and
its real property located at 1985 and 1987 3 Avenue, New York, New
York (Block 1659, Lots 1&2) nunc pro tunc.

Interior Development Consulting LLC as a Consultant will provide
consulting services to obtain financing, refinancing, securing
insurance, negotiating with the existing tenant of the Property and
to secure specialized bankruptcy attorney's services.

Interior Development's consulting fee is 1% of the total contract
price.

Richard Guishard, owner of Interior Development Consulting LLC,
attests that Interior neither holds nor represents any interests
adverse to the Debtor’s estate and is a "disinterested person"
within the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Richard Guishard
     Interior Development Consulting LLC
     92 Eagle Street
     Brooklyn, NY 11222

                  About 1989 3Ave

Based in Elmhurst, New York, 1989 3Ave, LLC, a privately held
company engaged in activities related to real estate, filed a
voluntary Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-47234)
on Dec. 19, 2018.  In the petition signed by Bo Jin Zhu, manager,
the Debtor disclosed assets totaling $23,000,106 and liabilities
totaling $24,761,785.  The case is assigned to Hon. Nancy Hershey
Lord.  William X. Zou, Esq., in Flushing, New York, is the Debtor's
counsel.


41-23 HAIGHT STREET: Trustee Seeks to Hire Accountant
-----------------------------------------------------
Gregory Messer, Chapter 11 trustee for 41-23 Haight Street Realty,
Inc., seeks authority from the  United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of New York to hire an accountant.

In an application filed in court, the trustee proposes to employ
Gary Lampert, a certified public accountant, to:

     a. assist in preparing the Debtor's monthly operating reports;


     b. provide tax advice on estate transactions;

     c. prepare any appropriate tax returns;

     d. review and analyze documents for potential causes of action
on behalf of the estate, including for preferential transfers and
fraudulent conveyances;

     e. prepare any necessary reports detailing claims in
anticipation of litigation;

     f. assist the Trustee in investigating the disposition of
funds prior to and subsequent to the Petition Date; and

     g. assist with such other matters as the Trustee or her
counsel may request from time to time.

The accountant charges an hourly fee of $350 for his services.  The
billing rate for paraprofessionals assisting him is $120 per hour.

Mr. Lampert disclosed in court filings that he is a "disinterested
person" as that term is defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

Mr. Lampert maintains an office at:

     Gary R. Lampert, CPA
     100 Merrick Rd #211W
     Rockville Centre, NY 11570
     Phone: 516-208-7500
     Fax: 516-208-5414
     Email: lampertcpa@optimum.net

                  About 41-23 Haight Street Realty Inc.

41-23 Haight Street Realty, Inc. is a Single Asset Real Estate (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B).

On June 4, 2019, an involuntary petition pursuant to Chapter 11 of
Title 11 of the United States Code in the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York was filed against 41-23
Haight Street Realty, Inc. by petitioning creditors, Wen Mei Wang,
Xian Kang Zhang, and Yu Qing Wang.

The case is assigned to Judge Nancy Hershey Lord.  Victor Tsai,
Esq., is the Debtor's legal counsel.

On August 12, 2019, the Court appointed of Gregory Messer as
Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor's estate.  The trustee is
represented by LaMonica Herbst & Maniscalco, LLP.


41-23 HAIGHT STREET: Trustee Taps LaMonica Herbst as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory Messer, the Chapter 11 trustee for 41-23 Haight Street
Realty, Inc., seeks authority from the  United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to retain LaMonica
Herbst & Maniscalco, LLP as his counsel effective Aug. 12.

The services LaMonica will render are:

     a. advise the Trustee in connection with the operation of the
Debtor's business;

     b. assist and advise the Trustee in the preservation and
liquidation of the Debtor's assets;

     c. prepare, as may be necessary, a plan of reorganization and
related documents;

     d. conduct investigations, conduct examinations and commence
actions as may be necessary for the Trustee to complete his
statutory duties;

     e. investigate and advise the Trustee as to the actions and
activities of any insiders and the existence of any claims or
causes of action that can be pursued for the benefit of the
Debtor's estate;

     f. prepare, file and prosecute motions objecting to claims, as
directed by the Trustee, that may be necessary to complete the
administration of the Debtor's estate;

     g. prepare and file motions and applications, as directed by
the Trustee, in connection with the Trustee's statutory duties in
this case; and

     h. perform any other legal services for the Trustee in
connection with his statutory powers and duties.

The firm's current hourly rates are:

Para-professionals  $200
Associates          $425
Partners            $635

Gary Herbst, Esq., at LaMonica, disclosed in court filings that the
firm is a "disinterested person" as that term is defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Gary F. Herbst, Esq.
     LaMonica Herbst & Maniscalco, LLP
     3305 Jerusalem Avenue, Suite 201
     Wantagh, NY 11793
     Tel: (516) 826-6500

                  About 41-23 Haight Street Realty Inc.

41-23 Haight Street Realty, Inc. is a Single Asset Real Estate (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B).

On June 4, 2019, an involuntary petition pursuant to Chapter 11 of
Title 11 of the United States Code in the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York was filed against 41-23
Haight Street Realty, Inc. by petitioning creditors, Wen Mei Wang,
Xian Kang Zhang, and Yu Qing Wang.

The case is assigned to Judge Nancy Hershey Lord.  Victor Tsai,
Esq., is the Debtor's legal counsel.

On August 12, 2019, the Court appointed of Gregory Messer as
Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor's estate.  The trustee is
represented by LaMonica Herbst & Maniscalco, LLP.


A'GACI LLC: Seeks to Hire Eric Terry Law as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
A'GACI, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Texas to hire Eric Terry Law, PLLC as its legal
counsel.

The firm will provide services in connection with the Debtor's
Chapter 11 case, which include legal advice regarding its powers
and duties under the Bankruptcy Code, the preparation of a
bankruptcy plan and assistance with respect to the sale of its
assets.

Eric Terry, Esq., the firm's attorney who will be handling the
case, has agreed to reduce his standard hourly rate of $425 to
$350.  His firm received a retainer in the amount of $34,635.

Mr. Terry disclosed in court filings that the firm is
"disinterested" within the meaning of Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Eric Terry, Esq.
     Eric Terry Law, PLLC
     3511 Broadway
     San Antonio, TX 78209
     Telephone: (210) 468-8274
     Facsimile: (210) 319-5447
     Email: eric@ericterrylaw.com

                        About A'GACI LLC

Headquartered in San Antonio, Texas, A'GACI is a fast-fashion
retailer of women's apparel and accessories.  It operates specialty
apparel and footwear stores under the A'GACI banner as well as a
direct-to-consumer business comprised of its e-commerce website
www.agacistore.com.  Stores feature an assortment of tops, dresses,
bottoms, jewelry, and accessories sold primarily under the Debtor's
exclusive A'GACI label.  In addition, the Debtor sells shoes under
its sister brand labels of O'Shoes and Boutique Five.

The Debtor previously sought bankruptcy protection on Jan. 9, 2018
(Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 18-50049).

A'GACI again filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No.
19-51919) on August 7, 2019.  In the petition signed by manager
David Won, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in total
assets and $50 million to $100 million in total liabilities.  

The case is assigned to Judge Ronald B. King.  

The Debtor tapped Eric Terry Law, PLLC as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel; SierraConstellation Partners, LLC as financial advisor;
and Prime Clerk LLC as claims, noticing and balloting agent.


ACE EDUCATION: Seeks to Hire Brannen Firm as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Ace Education International Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia to hire The
Brannen Firm, LLC, as its legal counsel.

The firm will provide services in connection with the Debtor's
Chapter 11 case, which include legal advice regarding its rights
and duties under the Bankruptcy Code, the preparation of a
bankruptcy plan, and examinations incidental to the administration
of the case.

The firm's hourly rates are:

        Joseph Chad Brannen       $350
        Paralegal/Support Staff    $75

Brannen does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its bankruptcy estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Joseph Chad Brannen, Esq.
     The Brannen Firm, LLC
     7147 Jonesboro Road, Suite G
     Morrow, GA 30260
     Tel: (770) 474-0847
     Fax: 770-474-6078
     Email: chad@brannenlawfirm.com

                 About Ace Education International

Ace Education International Inc. owns and operates a school in
McDonough, Ga., offering elementary and secondary education.

Ace Education International sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-62049) on Aug. 2,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $1 million and liabilities of between $1 million and $10
million.  The Brannen Firm, LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.



AERO-MARINE: Seeks to Hire Tall Pines Realty as Real Estate Broker
------------------------------------------------------------------
Aero-Marine Technologies, Inc. seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida to hire Tall
Pines Realty, Inc. as its real estate broker.

Tall Pines as the Debtor's exclusive broker will market and sell a
real property located at 3249 Antigua Drive in Punta Gorda, Fla.,
and a quarter share of a property located at 7201 Rum Bay Drive,
Unit 4113-A in Palm Island, Fla.

The broker's compensation is 6 percent of the total purchase
price.

Jeremy Jones, independent contractor licensed under the brokerage
of Tall Pines, disclosed in court filings that the firm neither
represents nor holds any interest adverse to the Debtor and its
bankruptcy estate.

The broker can be reached through:

     Jeremy Jones
     Tall Pines Realty, Inc.
     1500 S McCall Rd.
     Englewood, FL 34223
     Office: (941) 698-4111
     Mobile: (941) 475-5015
     Fax: (941) 697-6476

                   About Aero-Marine Technologies

Aero-Marine Technologies, Inc. --
https://www.aero-marinetechnologies.com/ -- provides total support
for waste and water system components found on Boeing, Airbus and
Embraer aircraft.  Aero-Marine Technologies is a full-service
Maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) with a worldwide customer
base.

Aero-Marine Technologies sought bankruptcy protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-07547) on
Aug. 9, 2019.  The Debtor's case is jointly administered to that of
Joseph N. Vaughn and Theresa L. Vaughn.

In the petition signed by Joseph N. Vaughn, president,
Aero-Marine's assets are estimated at $500,000 to $1 million, and
its liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

The Hon. Caryl E. Delano is the case judge.

Stitchler, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A. is the Debtor's legal
counsel.


ALMANOR LAKEFRONT: Taps Macdonald Fernandez as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Almanor Lakefront, LLC received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of California to hire Macdonald
Fernandez LLP as its legal counsel.

The firm will provide services in connection with the Debtor's
Chapter 11 case, which include the preparation of a bankruptcy
plan, evaluation of claims and review of monthly operating reports.


The firm's hourly rates are:

         Partners                $390
         Associate Attorneys     $290
         Paralegals              $100

Macdonald Fernandez received the sum of $20,000 from the Debtor as
a retainer.

Reno F.R. Fernandez III, Esq., a partner at Macdonald Fernandez,
disclosed in court filings that the firm is "disinterested" within
the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Macdonald Fernandez can be reached through:

     Reno F.R. Fernandez, Esq.
     Daniel E. Vaknin, Esq.
     221 Sansome Street, Third Floor  
     San Francisco, CA 94104
     Telephone: (415) 362-0449
     Facsimile: (415) 392-5544
     Email: 2382885420@filings.docketbird.com

                      About Almanor Lakefront

Almanor Lakefront LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 19-51578) on Aug. 5,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $500,000 and liabilities of less than $1 million.
Macdonald Fernandez LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.



AMYRIS INC: Further Modifies 2019 Cash Bonus Plan
-------------------------------------------------
The Leadership Development and Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors of Amyris, Inc. approved certain further modifications
to the Company's 2019 cash bonus plan.

The Amended Bonus Plan provides the following structure for
executives:

   * General Structure. The Amended Bonus Plan provides for
     funding and payout of cash bonus awards based on quarterly
     and annual performance during 2019.  The funding of the
     Amended Bonus Plan for each bonus period is based on the
     Company's performance under certain metrics set by the
     Committee for each quarter and for the year.  Payouts under
     the Amended Bonus Plan would occur following a review of the
     Company's results and performance for each quarter and for
     the year and the executive officers' individual performance
     results at the end of the year.

   * Funding Levels and Performance Metrics. The total funding
     possible under the Amended Bonus Plan is based on a cash
     value determined by the executive officers' target bonus
     levels.  Target bonus levels for the Company's executive
     officers vary by officer, but are generally set between 50%
     and 100% of annual base salary.  The aggregate amount of
     these target bonuses are the basis for the total potential
     funding of the Amended Bonus Plan.  The quarterly and annual
     funding of the Amended Bonus Plan is based on achievement of
     the following Company performance metrics for the applicable
     quarter and full year 2019, respectively: GAAP revenue
    (weighted 100% for each quarterly period and 50% for the
     annual period), operating expenses (weighted 30% for the
     annual period) and direct gross profit (weighted 20% for the
     annual period).  For each quarterly period and for the
     annual period of the Amended Bonus Plan, "threshold,"
     "target" and "superior" performance levels are set for each
     applicable performance metric based on the Company's
     operating plan, which performance levels are intended to
     capture the relative difficulty of achievement of that
     metric.

   * Funding Calculation. For each of the four quarterly periods
     of the Amended Bonus Plan, the Amended Bonus Plan allocates
     12.5% of the total Target Bonus Fund.  For the annual period
     of the Amended Bonus Plan, the Amended Bonus Plan allocates
     50% of the total Target Bonus Fund.  Funding for a given
     Amended Bonus Plan period is based on the weighted average
     achievement level of the applicable performance metrics   
     described above that achieve at least the "threshold"
     performance level for such period.  If the Company does not
     achieve at least a 50% weighted average achievement level of
     the applicable performance metrics described above for a
     given Amended Bonus Plan period, no funding would occur
     under the Amended Bonus Plan for such period.  If the
     Company achieves the funding threshold level, 50% funding
     would occur.  For a weighted average achievement between the
     funding threshold level and "target" level, a pro rata
     increase in funding would occur up to 100% of the Target
     Bonus Fund for the applicable Amended Bonus Plan period.  
     For weighted average achievement above the target level, an
     increase in funding of 1.67% for every 1% above target
     performance would occur up to 150% of the Target Bonus Fund
     for such period.

   * Payouts. Any payouts for the quarterly periods of the
     Amended Bonus Plan would be the same as the funded level
     based on Company performance (provided the recipient meets
     eligibility requirements), subject to the final discretion
     of the Committee.  Payouts for the annual period of the
     Amended Bonus Plan would be made from the aggregate funded
     amount in the discretion of the Committee based on Company
     and individual performance, and could range from 0% to 200%
     of an individual's funded amount for the annual Amended
     Bonus Plan period.

As previously reported, on Nov. 8, 2018 and Feb. 19, 2019, the
Committee approved modifications to the 2019 Cash Bonus Plan  that
included the cash bonus plan for the Company's executive officers,
including the Company's chief executive officer, chief financial
officer and other current named executive officers.  

                          About Amyris

Amyris, Inc., based in Emeryville, California, is an industrial
biotechnology company that applies its technology platform to
engineer, manufacture and sell natural, sustainably sourced
products into the health & wellness, clean skincare, and flavors &
fragrances markets.  The Company's proven technology platform
enables it to rapidly engineer microbes and use them as catalysts
to metabolize renewable, plant-sourced sugars into large volume,
high-value ingredients.  The Company's biotechnology platform and
industrial fermentation process replace existing complex and
expensive manufacturing processes.  The Company has successfully
used its technology to develop and produce five distinct molecules
at commercial volumes.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm KPMG LLP,
the Company's auditor since 2017, on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, includes an
explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and has current debt service
requirements that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.

Amyris reported net losses attributable to the company of $72.32
million in 2017, $97.33 million in 2016, and $217.95 million in
2016.  As of Sept. 30, 2018, Amyris had $122.7 million in total
assets, $323.3 million in total liabilities, $5 million in
contingently redeemable common stock, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $205.6 million.


ANKUR INVESTMENT: Taps Grasl PLC as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
Ankur Investments Inc. received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to hire Grasl PLC as its
legal counsel.

The firm will advise the company and its affiliates of their duties
under the Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services in
connection with their Chapter 11 cases.

Grasl charges an hourly fee of $350.  The firm received from the
Debtors and their principals the sum of $32,000, of which $17,750
was used to pay its pre-bankruptcy services while $6,868 was used
to pay the filing fees.

Jeffrey Grasl, Esq., at Grasl, disclosed in court filings that the
firm is "disinterested" within the meaning of Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jeffrey S. Grasl, Esq.
     Grasl PLC
     31800 Northwestern Hwy., Suite 350
     Farmington Hills, MI 48334
     Phone: 248.385.2980
     Email: jeff@graslplc.com

                      About Ankur Investment

Ankur Investment Inc., a privately held company in the traveler
accommodation industry, and its affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Lead Case No. 19-50367) on July 16,
2019.  In the petition signed by Nareshkumar Patel, manager, the
Debtor estimated assets between $1 million and $10 million and
liabilities of the same range.  The Hon. Marci B. McIvor is the
case judge.  Jeffrey S. Grasl, Esq., of Grasl PLC is the Debtors'
legal counsel.


ASP MCS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'CCC' on Weak Operating Results
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on U.S.-based
residential mortgage field services provider ASP MCS Acquisition
Corp. and its issue-level rating on its senior secured credit
facilities to 'CCC' from 'CCC+' and revised its recovery rating on
the senior secured facilities to '4' from '3'.

The downgrade reflects S&P's weak assessment of MCS' liquidity and
its belief that the company's capital structure is unsustainable
given its sustained weak operating performance. S&P's forecast
includes its expectation that the weakness in the company's
operating performance will likely persist over the next 12 months
as fixed-charge coverage deficits continue to erode its liquidity
after debt service. The rating agency forecasts that ASP MCS will
sustain adjusted debt leverage of more than 15x over the next 12-24
months. S&P also views the likelihood that the company's capital
structure will improve in the near term as low given the rating
agency's expectation for a weak operating performance amid a
slowdown in servicing volumes. As of Aug. 15, 2019, the qualitative
assessment of S&P Global's economists, combined with calculated
odds, puts the risk of a recession in the U.S. in the next 12
months at 30%-35%. MCS' business prospects are inversely correlated
with economic activity.

The negative outlook on ASP MCS reflects S&P's diminished view of
the company's liquidity and business scale because of the sharp
decline in its revenue and business conditions. S&P now believes
that the company's capital structure is unsustainable absent a
material improvement in its performance and views the risk of a
distressed debt exchange or payment default over the near term as
high.

"We could lower our ratings on ASP MCS if we believe a default is
inevitable in the next six months. This could occur if the
company's operating performance deteriorates more than we currently
expect, further eroding its liquidity and leading to a
restructuring or payment default," S&P said.

"It is unlikely that we would raise our rating on ASP MCS in the
next 12 months given its declining performance trends and our
belief that it does not generate sufficient cash flow to support
its operations and debt service needs. However, we could raise our
rating if there is a significant reversal in the company's
operating performance and revenue trends that improves its
liquidity position and credit protection metrics," the rating
agency said.


AVENUE STORES: Taps Malfitano Advisors as Asset Disposition Advisor
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Avenue Stores, LLC and its debtors-affiliate seek authority from
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (Delaware) to
hire Malfitano Advisors, LLC as their asset disposition advisor and
consultant.

The firm will provide these services in connection with the
Debtors' Chapter 11 cases:  

     (a) advise the Debtors regarding the disposition of selected
business assets, including designated inventory, furniture,
fixtures, and equipment;

     (b) review and advise the Debtors and their advisors with
respect to issues associated with any planned store closures,
including timing and coordination;

     (c) assist in the preparation of an appropriate information
package for distribution to potential bidders;

     (d) review bid proposals and assist in negotiations with the
various parties to ensure recoveries are maximized;

     (e) assist in the documentation of any transaction involving
the liquidation of inventory and review pleadings that may need to
be filed with a court in order to effectuate the same;

     (f) monitor the conduct and results of any third party
selected to liquidate any inventory counts and/or sales and assist
the Debtors as it relates to any negotiations with respect
thereto;

     (g) review and inspect the Debtors' assets as may be requested
from time to time by the Company, including, but not limited to
inventory and fixed assets; and

     (h) attend meetings, as requested, with the Company, its
lenders, potential investors, and other parties in interest.

Malfitano's hourly rates are:

     Joseph Malfitano, Principal                $740
     Stephanie Gould, VP, Financial Analyst     $435
     Glendan Schwarting, VP, Financial Analyst  $435
     Gary Carlton, Field Director               $410

On August 1, 2019, the Debtors paid Malfitano Advisors $75,000.00
as an initial retainer. On August 9, 2019, the Debtors paid
Malfitano Advisors an additional $30,058.55 to replenish the
initial retainer. As of the Petition
Date, Malfitano Advisors was holding $32,089.69 as a retainer.

Joseph A. Malfitano, Founder and Managing Member of Malfitano
Advisors, LLC, attests that his firm does not hold any interest
materially adverse to the Debtors' estates, has no connection with
the Debtors, their creditors, equity security holders, or related
parties herein, and is a "disinterested person" within the meaning
of section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Joseph A. Malfitano
     Malfitano Advisors, LLC   
     747 Third Avenue, 2nd Floor
     New York, NY 10017
     Phone: 646-776-0155

                    About Avenue Stores, LLC

Headquartered in Rochelle Park, New Jersey, the Debtors are
national specialty fashion retailers of women's plus-sized apparel,
intimates, footwear, and accessories that is dedicated to providing
real-sized women with modern and fashionable clothes at affordable
prices.

Avenue Stores, LLC, and three affiliates concurrently filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-11842) on August 16, 2019.
The petitions were signed by David Rhoads, chief financial officer.
At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated $50 million to $100
million in assets and $100 million to $500 million in liabilities.

Betsy Lee Feldman at Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor represents the
Debtor as counsel.


BELEAVE INC: Seeks to Postpone Release of Q1 Financial Statements
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Beleave Inc. on Aug. 23, 2019, provided a status report on the
management cease trade order ("MCTO"), announced in the Company's
news release from Aug. 8, 2019 (the "Default Announcement"), which
was granted by the Ontario Securities Commission ()OSC"), its
principal regulator.

Beleave is providing this bi-weekly default status report in
accordance with National Policy 12-203 Management Cease Trade
Orders ("NP 12-203").  As previously announced on July 30, 2019,
the application for the MCTO was made by the Company due to a delay
in the filing of its audited annual financial statements. The delay
is the result of a comprehensive quarterly review, already in
progress, of previous results and statements by the Company.  As a
result of the ongoing review, the Company has made an extension
request to the OSC to postpone the release of its Q1 financial
statements, due August 30, 2019, for the three months ended June
30, 2019, as it focuses on completing its audited annual financial
statements. The Company expects to release Q1 results by September
15, 2019.

Beleave confirms that it will file its audited annual financial
statements and management's discussion and analysis for the twelve
months ended March 31, 2019, by August 30, 2019.  Pursuant to NP
12-203, Beleave must file bi-weekly default status reports in the
form of a news release during the period of the MCTO.

Pursuant to the provisions of the alternative information
guidelines specified in NP 12-203, the Company confirms that since
the Default Announcement:

There have been no material changes to the information contained in
the Default Announcement that would reasonably be expected to be
material to an investor;

There have been no failures by the Company to fulfill its stated
intentions with respect to satisfying the provisions of the
alternative information reporting guidelines under NP 12-203;

There is no other material information respecting the Company's
affairs that has not been generally disclosed.

Beleave intends to comply with the provisions of the alternative
information guidelines as set out in NP 12-203.  The Company will
also continue to disclose any other material information concerning
its affairs and ongoing business activities.

                        About Beleave Inc.

Beleave (otcqx:BLEVF) is an ISO certified, Canadian cannabis
company headquartered in the Greater Toronto Area that cultivates
high-quality cannabis flower, oil and extracts for medical and
recreational markets.  Beleave is fully licenced to cultivate and
sell medical and recreational cannabis and is leading the way
through research partnerships with universities to develop
pharma-grade extracts and derivatives.

Beleave is developing new product lines, including cannabis-infused
products, oils, vape pens, and other novel cannabis delivery
methods for 2019.  Beleave has developed a network of medical
cannabis clinics in Ontario and Quebec under the Medi-Green banner.
Through its majority ownership of Procannmed S.A.S., Beleave is
fully licensed to cultivate, produce, and extract medical cannabis
in Colombia positioning it to capitalize on exports and the
expanding Latin American market.  The Company has partnered with
Canymed GmbH to supply the German market with medical cannabis.


BETTERU EDUCATION: Delays Annual Filings, Granted MCTO
------------------------------------------------------
betterU Education Corp., is providing this bi-weekly default status
report in accordance with National Policy 12-203 - Cease Trade
Orders for Continuous Disclosure Defaults ("NP 12-203").  In its
initial default announcement of July 25, 2019 ()Default Notice"),
the Company announced the delay in the filing of its audited annual
financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019
()2018 Annual Financial Statements"), the accompanying management's
discussion and analysis and the related CEO and CFO certifications
()Annual Filings") by the filing deadline of July 29, 2019.

As previously announced, the Company applied for and was granted
management cease trade orders in respect of the delayed Annual
Filings (the "MCTO") by the British Columbia Securities Commission
and the Ontario Securities Commission which prohibit the chief
financial officer and the chief executive officer from trading in
the Company's securities for so long as there are filings that are
outstanding under applicable securities laws.  The MCTO does not
affect the ability of the general investing public to trade in the
Company's listed common shares

The audit of the 2018 Annual Financial Statements is well underway
with BDO and the Company currently continues to expect to file the
Annual Filings before the end of September 2019.

The Company confirmed that since the Default Notice: (i) there is
no material change to the information set out in the Default Notice
that has not been generally disclosed; (ii) there has been no
failure by the Company in fulfilling its stated intentions with
respect to satisfying the provisions of the alternative information
guidelines set out in NP 12-203; (iii) there has not been any other
specified default by the Company under NP 12-203; and (iv) there is
no other material information concerning the affairs of the Company
that has not been generally disclosed.

The Company will continue to comply with the provisions of the
alternative information guidelines under NP 12-203 by issuing
bi-weekly default status reports in the form of news releases for
so long as it remains in default of the filing requirements set out
above.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider
(as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture
Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of
this release.

                         About betterU

better (BTRU) (frankfurt:5OGA) is an online education technology
company that aims to provide access to quality education from
around the world in order to foster growth and opportunity to those
who want to better their lives.  The Company plans to bridge the
prevailing gap in the education and job industry and enhance the
lives of its prospective learners by developing an integrated
ecosystem.  betterU's offerings can be categorized into four broad
functions: to compliment school programs with flexible KG-12
programs preparing children for their next stage of education, to
foster an exceptional educational environment by providing
befitting skills that lead to a better career, to bridge the gap
between one's existing education and prospective job requirement by
training them and lastly, to connect the end user to various job
opportunities.



BORDEAUX FARMS: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
---------------------------------------------------
The Disclosure Statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan of Bordeaux
Farms, LLC, is approved.

October 17, 2019 at 2:00 pm at US Courthouse, Room 200, 255 W Main
St., Charlottesville, VA 22902 is fixed as the date, time and place
of hearing upon confirmation of said Plan.

That October 10, 2019 is fixed as the last date for filing and
written objections to confirmation of the Plan.

Class 3 - Non-priority Unsecured Creditors - None.

Class 2 - Secured claim of Spotts Fain, P.C. are impaired. Total
debt compromised pursuant to agreement between the Debtor and the
Secured Creditor shall be $200,000.00 with interest at the rate of
6%. The payment shall consist of the following terms. A monthly
interest only payment of $1,000.00 a month from July 26, 2019, to
December 23, 2019, at which time the Debtor shall make a lump sum
payment of $100,000.00 directly to the Creditor, which said payment
shall be received by said creditor not later than December 23,
2019. The remaining payment balance of $100,000 shall be paid with
interest of6% and shall be amortized over 36 months beginning on
January 23, 2020 in the amount of $3042.19 a month with the final
payment due on or before December 23, 2023, or immediately upon a
sale of the Debtors property, whichever occurs first. The Debtor
and creditor have entered into a settlement agreement dated July
26, 2019 and executed by all parties.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
following. Service Dogs by Warren Retrievers LLC pays rent to the
debtor monthly in the amount of $3600.00. The income from this
rental lease will provide for the funding of the plan to the
creditor provided. The plan may also be funded from sale of real
estate owned by Bordeaux Farms, LLC and/or Charitable Occasion,
LLC.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated August
21, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y5mpgxu3 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                     About Bordeaux Farms

Bordeaux Farms, LLC, based in Madison, VA, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. W.D. Va. Case No. 19-60607) on March 20, 2019.  In
the petition signed by Charles D. Warren, Jr., sole member, the
Debtor disclosed $1,116,800 in assets and $300,000 in liabilities.
The Hon. Rebecca B. Connelly oversees the case.  Stephen E. Dunn,
Esq., at Stephen E. Dunn, PLLC, serves as bankruptcy counsel.


C.M. MEIERS: Trustee Taps Jenkins Mulligan as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bradley Sharp, the Chapter 11 trustee for C.M. Meiers Company Inc.,
received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California to hire Jenkins Mulligan & Gabriel, LLP as
his legal counsel.

The firm will substitute for the trustee's current bankruptcy
counsel Gould & Gould, LLP.

Since the filing of the Debtor's Chapter 11 case, Jenkins has
represented the trustee as special litigation counsel and has
worked closely with Gould throughout the proceedings.

Larry Gabriel, Esq., the firm's attorney who will be representing
the trustee, charges an hourly fee of $650.

Mr. Gabriel disclosed in court filings that the firm is composed of
"disinterested persons" within the meaning of Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Larry W. Gabriel, Esq.
     Jenkins Mulligan & Gabriel, LLP  
     21650 Oxnard Street, Suite 500
     Woodland Hills, CA 91367

                     About C.M. Meiers Company

C.M. Meiers Company Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No. 12-10229) on Jan. 9,
2012.  At the time of the filing, C.M. Meiers disclosed assets of
between $1,000,001 and $10,000,000 and liabilities of the same
range.

The case is assigned to Judge Maureen Tighe.  C.M. Meiers is
represented by Weintraub & Selth APC.

Bradley Sharp was appointed as Chapter 11 trustee for C.M. Meiers.
The trustee is represented by Jenkins Mulligan & Gabriel, LLP.


CASCADE FAMILY: Unsecureds to Get Full Payment From Earnings
------------------------------------------------------------
Cascade Family Skating, LLC, filed a Plan of Reorganization and
accompanying Disclosure Statement proposing that Class 7 (Unsecured
Claims), which are impaired, will be paid in full, from the
earnings of the Debtor’s Business, no later than 180 days after
the Effective Date.

Class 2 (Fulton County Tax Commissioner) are impaired. The Allowed
Class 2 Claim of the Fulton County Tax Commissioner will be paid,
from the earnings of the Debtor’s Business, $65,916.19 plus 4%
annual interest, payable in equal monthly installments of $1,031.00
per month for 72 months.

Class 3 (KeyBank) are impaired. The Allowed Class 3 Claim of
KeyBank will be paid, from the earnings of the Debtor’s Business,
$337,955.69 plus 6.5% annual interest, amortized over 10 years,
with a monthly payment of $4,485.15 per month for 60 months, and a
balloon payment of the remaining loan balance due at the end of the
60-month period.

Class 4 (SBA) are impaired. The Allowed Class 4 Claim of the SBA
will be paid, from the earnings of the Debtor’s Business,
$322,910.45 plus 1.85% annual interest payable in equal monthly
installments of $4,000.00 for 84 months.

Class 5 (Georgia Department of Revenue) are impaired. The Allowed
Class 5 Claim of the Georgia Department of Revenue will be paid,
from the earnings of the Debtor’s Business, $600,000.00 plus
interest as follows: (i) $200,000.00 of the Claim amount will
accrue no interest and will be paid in equal monthly installments
of $2,380.00 for 84 months; (ii) $400,000.00 of the Claim amount
will accrue interest at the rate of 6% annually and will be paid in
equal monthly installments of $5,843.00 for 84 months.

Class 6 (Internal Revenue Service) are impaired. The Allowed Class
6 Claim of the Internal Revenue Service will be paid, from the
earnings of the Debtor’s Business, $40,000.00 plus 4% annual
interest, payable in equal monthly installments of $1,216.00 for 36
months.

Class 8 (Golden Glide, Inc.) are Impaired. The Allowed Class 8
Claim of Golden Glide, Inc. will be subordinated to all other
Claims and will receive no distributions until all other
distributions on account of all Allowed Claims are made as provided
in the Plan.

All of the Debtor's assets will be vested with the Reorganized
Debtor. Distributions under the Plan will be made by the
Reorganized Debtor from earnings of the Business
post-confirmation.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 19, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y4qv8r23 from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

The Debtor also filed an Addendum to the Disclosure Statement.  The
Addendum is a budget showing projected monthly income and expenses
through December 2020.  The Budget is based on what the Debtor
considers conservative annual growth of 5-10%, which is consistent
with the growth experienced in recent years and is actually
relatively low when compared to growth seen in recent months.

A full-text copy of the Addendum dated August 20, 2019, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/y2mj3efq from PacerMonitor.com at
no charge.

The Debtor further asked the Court for extension of its deadline to
confirm the Plan through and including November 30, 2019.  Section
1129(e) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that, in a small business
case, the Court must confirm a plan "not later than 45 days after
the plan is filed unless the time for confirmation is extended in
accordance with section 1121(e)(3)."  Although Bankruptcy Rule
3017.1 provides for conditional approval of the Disclosure
Statement, that determination has not been made.  The Debtor
asserted that if the Court directs a standard treatment for the
Disclosure Statement, confirmation of the Plan within 45 days would
be impossible.

The hearing on the Motion to Extend will be held on September 12,
2019 at 10:15 AM.

Attorneys for the Debtor:

     William A. Rountree, Esq.
     Benjamin R. Keck, Esq.
     ROUNTREE LEITMAN & KLEIN, LLC
     Century Plaza I
     2987 Clairmont Road, Suite 175
     Atlanta, Georgia 30329
     Tel: (404) 584-1244
     Email: wrountree@rlklawfirm.com
            bkeck@rlklawfirm.com

                   About Cascade Family Skating

Cascade Family Skating, LLC -- https://atlantafamilyfuncenters.com/
-- owns a family entertainment center that operates a roller
skating rink in Atlanta, Georgia.  

Cascade Family Skating sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 18-57159) on April 27,
2018.  In the petition signed by Gregory Alexander, president, the
Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  The Debtor tapped
Rountree & Leitman, LLC as its legal counsel.  No official
committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the Chapter
11 case.


CELADON GROUP: Hires Former Swift Transportation CEO as CTO
-----------------------------------------------------------
Celadon Group, Inc. has engaged DPX Consulting LLC and that Richard
Stocking, DPX founder and former CEO of Swift Transportation
Company, will serve as chief transformation officer of the Celadon
Trucking Services, Inc., the Company's primary U.S truckload
business.

Chief Executive Officer, Paul Svindland, commented: "We are excited
to have Richard Stocking and the entire DPX team working with us to
accelerate needed improvements in our U.S. Truckload business.  DPX
brings Richard's decades of experience with Swift as well as the
deep analytical and front-line operations capability of two other
seasoned truckload executives.  All are veterans at instilling
sales and operating discipline, accountability, and a winning
culture.  With the recent closing of our refinancing, we are
laser-focused on returning to profitable operations, and we expect
DPX to help us achieve a rapid and resilient pace of change.  We
especially appreciate Richard's personal commitment to our
turnaround, evidenced by accepting the role of Chief Transformation
Officer.  This vote of confidence by an industry leader shows how
far the organization has come over the past several quarters and is
inspiring to our people."

DPX Commentary

"Celadon is a respected player in the North American supply chain.
We have studied the Company for several months and are convinced of
the inherent potential of the franchise.  We plan to work with
Celadon's leaders to adopt proven methods that enhance efficiency,
set clear and measurable goals, and empower people through
ownership of their results.  Not only will performance improve, the
entire organization will be energized by creating a winning
culture.  I'm looking forward to working with Paul and the team as
we roll out the program through every part of the business."

Consulting Agreement Highlights

The Company and DPX have entered into a Consulting Agreement under
which DPX will provide broad-based management services overseeing
Celadon Trucking.  The business, with a run rate of approximately
$400 million in annual revenue, comprises approximately 75% of
consolidated revenue and offers the Company's largest opportunity
for earnings improvement.

Highlights of the agreement include the following:

   * DPX will oversee sales, operations, and maintenance for
     Celadon Trucking and will provide customer and vendor
     introductions and support as needed

   * Richard Stocking will provide primary leadership of the
     Celadon Trucking team

   * Compensation includes an incentive component linked to
     achievement of progressively improving operating margin
     benchmarks

                           About Celadon

Celadon Group, Inc. -- http://www.celadongroup.com/-- provides
long haul, regional, local, dedicated, intermodal,
temperature-protect, and expedited freight service across the
United States, Canada, and Mexico.  The Company also owns Celadon
Logistics Services, which provides freight brokerage services,
freight management, as well as supply chain management solutions,
including logistics, warehousing, and distribution.  The Company is
headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana.

In a press release dated April 2, 2018, Celadon stated that based
on issues identified in connection with the Audit Committee
investigation and management's review, financial statements for
fiscal years ended June 30, 2014, 2015, 2016, and the quarters
ended Sept. 30 and Dec. 31, 2016, will be restated.  Celadon's new
senior management team, led by the Company's new chief financial
officer and new chief accounting officer, commenced a review of the
Company's current and historical accounting policies and
procedures.  The internal investigation and management review have
identified errors that will require adjustments to the previously
issued 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 financial statements.  

The New York Stock Exchange notified the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 18, 2018, of its intention to remove the entire
class of the common stock of Celadon Group from listing and
registration on the Exchange on April 30, 2018, pursuant to the
provisions of Rule 12d2-2(b) because, in the opinion of the
Exchange, the Common Stock is no longer suitable for continued
listing and trading on the Exchange.


CENTINELA VALLEY: Sept. 26 Disclosure Statement Hearing
-------------------------------------------------------
Centinela Valley Endoscopy Center, Inc., filed a motion requesting
that the court approve the adequacy of their disclosure statement
explaining their Chapter 11 Plan.  A hearing will be held on
September 26, 2019 at 11:00 A.M. in Courtroom 1368, Roybal Federal
Building, 255 E. Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012.

Attorneys for the Debtor are Daniel J. Weintraub, Esq., James R.
Selth, Esq., and Crystle J. Lindsey, Esq., at Weintraud & Selth,
APC, in Los Angeles, California.

                    About Centinela Valley

Centinela Valley Endoscopy Center, Inc., is a California
corporation operating a free-standing ambulatory endoscopy center
for procedures not requiring hospital admission, formed on Sept.
18, 2003 by doctors Stephen A.C. Parnell, Donald R. Henderson,
Steven A. Lerner, and Mark Lott in response to the need for
cost-effective diagnostic services in the medically underserved
community of Inglewood, California.

Centinela Valley Endoscopy Center filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Banrk. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-21391) on Sept. 28, 2018, estimating
$100,001 to $500,000 in assets and $500,001 to $1 million in
liabilities.  The Debtor is represented by Nina Z Javan at
Weintraub & Selth, APC.


CHARITABLE OCCASION: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------------
The Disclosure Statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan of
Charitable Occasion, LLC, is approved.

October 17, 2019 at 2:00 pm at US Courthouse, Room 200, 255 W Main
St., Charlottesville, VA 22902 is fixed as the date, time and place
of hearing upon confirmation of said Plan.
October 10, 2019 is fixed as the last date for filing and serving
written objections to confirmation of the Plan.

Class 3 - Non-priority unsecured creditors. None.

Class 2 - Secured claims of Spotts Fain, P.C.  are impaired. Total
debt compromised pursuant to agreement between the Debtor and the
Secured Creditor shall be $200,000.00 with interest at the rate of
6%. The payment shall consist of the following terms. A monthly
interest only payment of $1,000.00 a month from July 26, 2019, to
December 23, 2019, at which time the Debtor shall make a lump sum
payment of $100,000.00 directly to the Creditor,which said payment
shall be received by said creditor not later than December 23,
2019. The remaining payment balance of $100,000 shall be paid with
interest of 6% and shall be amortized over 36 months beginning on
January 23, 2020 in the amount of $3042.19 a month with the final
payment due on or before December 23, 2023, or immediately upon a
sale of the Debtors property, whichever occurs first. The Debtor
and creditor have entered into a settlement agreement dated July
26, 2019 and executed by all parties.

Service Dogs by Warren Retrievers LLC pays rent to the sister
company of the debtor, Bordeaux Farms, LLC, monthly in the amount
of $3600 00. The income from this rental lease will provide for the
funding of the plan to the creditor provided. The plan may also be
funded from sale of real estate owned by Charitable Occasion, LLC
and/or Bordeaux Farms, LLC.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated August
21, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yxvwy4o9 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Based in Madison, Virginia, Charitable Occasion, LLC, a Single
Asset Real Estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)), filed
a voluntary Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr. W.D. Va. Case No. 19-60609)
on March 20, 2019.  The case is assigned to Hon. Rebecca B.
Connelly.

The Debtor's counsel is Stephen E. Dunn, Esq., in Forest,
Virginia.

At the time of filing, the Debtor had total assets of $1,116,800
and total liabilities of $300,000.


CHARTER SCHOOL OF EDUCATIONAL: S&P Cuts Rev. Bond Rating to 'BB'
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its rating to 'BB' from 'BB+', on
Yonkers Economic Development Corp., N.Y.'s series 2010A educational
revenue bonds, issued for Charter School of Educational Excellence
(CSEE). The outlook is stable.

"The downgrade reflects our view of a substantial increase in
CSEE's debt to fund the construction of a new high school," said
S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Kaiti Wang.

The rating further reflects S&P's view of the following credit
weaknesses:

-- Pro forma MADS coverage between 0.78x and 0.82x based on fiscal
2018 financials, with similar coverage level expected for fiscal
2019;

-- Substantial additional debt resulting in debt per student of
over $70,000 and pro forma MADS burden of 31.2%, with figures to
improve gradually over the next few years if the high school meets
enrollment projections;

-- Growth risk with the opening of a new high school program in
fall 2019 and construction risk associated with the high school
building project, which is being financed; and

-- Inherent risk associated with charter reauthorization, given
that the bonds' final maturity exceeds the current charter's time
horizon.

Credit strengths that partly offset the above weaknesses include:

-- Stable to growing enrollment over the past three years;

-- Good academic performance, with CSEE outperforming the Yonkers
Public Schools and being named a Reward School by New York State
for five consecutive years;

-- Respectable cash position of about $2.8 million (unaudited) at
fiscal 2019 year-end or 100 days' cash on hand; and

-- A history of positive operating performance over the past three
years, with a $758,000 surplus in fiscal 2018 and another surplus
in fiscal 2019 of $1.3 million.

CSEE is in Yonkers, within Westchester County, N.Y., and serves
about 757 students in kindergarten through eighth grade (K-8).


COCRYSTAL PHARMA: Incurs $1.51 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $1.51 million on $592,000 of collaboration revenue for the three
months ended June 30, 2019, compared to a net loss of $1.34 million
on $0 of collaboration revenue for the three months ended June 30,
2018.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company reported net
income of $1.45 million on $5.67 million of collaboration revenue
compared to a net loss of $2.89 million on $0 of collaboration
revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $74.90 million in total
assets, $2.48 million in total liabilities, and $72.41 million in
total stockholders' equity.

                 Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash provided by operating activities was $990,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2019 compared to net cash used in operating
activities of $4,171,000 for the same period in 2018. This was
primarily due to the revenue resulting from the Collaboration
Agreement with Merck).

Net cash used for investing activities was approximately $29,000
for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $1,395,000 net
cash provided by investing activities for the same period in 2018.
For the six months ended June 30, 2019, net cash used for investing
activities consisted primarily of capital spending for computers
and lab equipment.  For the six months ended June 30, 2018, net
cash provided by investing activities primarily consisted of the
proceeds from the sale of the mortgage note asset for $1,400,000.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, cash provided by financing
activities totaled $3,811,000.  The Company's 2019 financing
activities included approximately $3,928,000 net proceeds from the
issuance of common stock, reduced by payments of $117,000 made on
the Company's lease liabilities for financed lab equipment.  Net
cash provided by financing activities was $8,869,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2018.  Net cash provided by financing
activities during the six months ended June 30, 2018 consisted of
$7,684,000 net proceeds from the issuance of common stock,
$1,000,000 in proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes, and
$185,000 in proceeds from the exercise of stock options.

To date the Company has focused its efforts on research and
development activities, including through collaborations with
suitable partners.  The Company has never been profitable on an
annual basis, has no products approved for sale, have not generated
any revenues to date from product sales, and has incurred
significant operating losses and negative operating cash flows on
an annual basis since inception.

The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenue
sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as
a going concern.  The Company said that based on cash on hand as of
Aug. 9, 2019 of approximately $7.2 million, it may not have the
capital to finance its operations including any unforeseen expenses
such as higher than anticipated legal costs and uninsured
catastrophe to the Company operations for the next 12 months.  The
ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent
on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund its operations
until it becomes profitable.  If the Company is unable to obtain
adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations or
substantially curtail its drug development activities.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/QuOiQP

                      About Cocrystal Pharma

Cocrystal Pharma, Inc., formerly known as Biozone Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., is a clinical stage biotechnology company discovering and
developing novel antiviral therapeutics that target the replication
machinery of hepatitis viruses, influenza viruses, and noroviruses.
The company is headquartered in Tucker, Georgia.

Cocrystal Pharma incurred a net loss of $49.05 million in 2018,
following a net loss of $613,000 in 2017.  As of March 31, 2019,
Cocrystal Pharma had $76.29 million in total assets, $2.47 million
in total liabilities, and $73.82 million in total stockholders'
equity.

BDO USA, LLP, in Miami, Florida, the Company's auditor since 2013,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated April 1,
2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations, negative cash flows from
operations and has an accumulated deficit that raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


COMFORT DENTAL STUDIO: Renews Request to Access Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------------------
Comfort Dental Studio, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Georgia  its Second Amended Motion for
Authorization to Use Cash Collateral.

The Debtor asserts that the use of cash collateral is essential to
avoid immediate and irreparable harm to its estate, to its
employees and its patients.

A certain Commercial Security Agreement gives the Bank of North
Georgia, Synovus Bank a security interest in the real estate
located at 2219 Loganville Hwy, Grayson, GA 30017, as well as the
accounts and equipment of Debtors.  As of Feb. 25, 2019, Synovus is
claiming that approximately $257,530 is due on the debt.  Partners
Capital Group also has a secured interest in Debtor's dental office
equipment, and claims it is owed $12,096.

                  About Comfort Dental Studio

Comfort Dental Studio, Inc., is a Georgia Corporation, and its
primary business involves the operation of a dental office as a
small business.  It sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-59879) on June 26,
2019.  

A companion case (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-60132) was filed by
Nelson-Wade Management Group, LLC on June 28, 2019.  Nelson-Wade is
the mortgagor for the real estate property at 2219 Loganville Hwy,
Grayson, GA 30017 where the dental office is located. The Debtor
will be seeking a joint administration of the two cases.

In the petition signed by their authorized representative, Dr.
Alisa Nelson, the Debtors estimated assets and liabilities of less
than $1 million each.

The Debtors are represented by Latif Oduola-Owoo, Esq. at
Arrington/Owoo, P.C.


CONSIS INTERNATIONAL: Creditors Object to Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------------------
Creditors, La Boliviana Ciacruz Seguros Y Reaseguros S.A. and La
Bolivana Ciacruz Seguros Personales S.A.; and Creditors,
Aseguradora Suiza Salvadoreña, S.A. and Asesuisa Vida, S.A.,
Seguros de Personas, filed separate objections to the First Amended
Disclosure Statement for Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization Proposed
by Debtor Consis International, LLC.

La Boliviana points out that the Revised Documents are still
accompanied by several issues rendering the Revised Disclosure
Statement patently unconfirmable.  La Boliviana further points out
that the Revised Documents do not provide sufficient information to
explain the treatment claimants in Class 3 are receiving under the
Revised Documents.  La Boliviana complains that the Revised
Documents do not provide sufficient information to enable parties
to assess feasibility.

Asesuisa points out that the Revised Documents do not provide
information to explain why the proposed treatment of Class 5
claimants (i.e., Asesuisa) renders that class unimpaired.
Asesuisa further points out that the Revised Documents do not
provide sufficient information about how the Revised Plan resolves
the "absolute priority rule" issues raised where equity proposes to
retain all its interests, while other classes are impaired under
the Revised Plan.

The Debtor, in response to La Boliviana, asserted that the
objection ignores the thousands of documents provided and
opportunity to address the issues.  The Objection does not even
reference additional information from which the answers to the
issues are set out, as set forth in the Amended Disclosure.

Attorney for Creditors:

     Allen P. Pegg, Esq.
     Jason L. Mays, Esq.
     HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
     600 Brickell Avenue, Suite 2700
     Miami, Florida 33131
     Telephone: (305) 459-6500
     Facsimile: (305) 459-6550
     Email: allen.pegg@hoganlovells.com
            jason.mays@hoganlovells.com

                 About Consis International

Consis International LLC -- https://www.consisint.com/ -- provides
computer systems design and related services. It was founded in
August 1987 in Caracas, Venezuela.

Consis International sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-22233) on Oct. 2,
2018.  In the petition signed by Oscar Carrera, manager, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  Judge John K. Olson oversees the case.
Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., is the Debtor's legal
counsel.


DASHCO INC: Case Summary & 15 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Dashco Inc.
           d/b/a Rainguard
           d/b/a Rainguard/Energy Tech
           f/d/b/a Energy-Tech Insulation
           d/b/a Rainguard Seamless Guttering
           f/d/b/a Rainguard Windows
           f/k/a Dashco-Rainguard Inc.
        4901 S. Becker Drive
        Bartonville, IL 61607

Business Description: Dashco Inc. dba Rainguard --
                      https://www.rainguardinc.com -- is a family
                      -owned business engaged in installing
                      siding, windows, soffits, and gutters.
                      Rainguard also has an insulation division
                      designed to provide their customers with
                      energy savings for their homes.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 28, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of Illinois (Peoria)

Case No.: 19-81229

Judge: Hon. Thomas L. Perkins

Debtor's Counsel: Sumner Bourne, Esq.
                  RAFOOL, BOURNE & SHELBY, P.C.
                  411 Hamilton Blvd #1600
                  Peoria, IL 61602
                  Tel: (309) 673-5535
                  E-mail: sbnotice@mtco.com

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Debra S. Belfield, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 15 unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilcb19-81229.pdf


DITECH HOLDING: Court Denies Confirmation of Plan
-------------------------------------------------
Becky Yerak, writing for The Wall Street Journal, reported that the
judge presiding over Ditech Holding Corp.'s bankruptcy rejected a
proposed restructuring of one of the nation's largest mortgage
origination and servicing businesses, ruling the terms weren't fair
to borrowers.

The plan is premised upon two going-concern sale transactions of
the Debtors' operations:

   1. a sale of the forward origination and servicing business (the
"Forward Sale") to New Residential Investment Corp. ("NRZ" or the
"Forward Buyer"), and

   2. a sale of the reorganized reverse servicing business (the
"Reverse Sale") to Mortgage Assets Management, LLC ("MAM") and SHAP
2018-1, LLC.

The plan also incorporates the Global Settlement agreed to by the
Debtors, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and the
Consenting Term Lenders.  The terms of that agreement are reflected
in the Second Amended Plan and the Debtors seek approval of the
settlement pursuant to Rule 9019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure.  One aspect of the settlement is that if approved, the
Debtors will establish a "Creditor Recovery Trust" for the benefit
of unsecured creditors, including Consumer Creditors.  Under the
settlement, the trust assets available for the sole benefit of the
Consumer Creditors consist of cash totaling $5,000,000, less
certain fees and expenses (the "$5,000,000 Fund"). The trust will
be funded from a carve-out from the Term Lenders' collateral.

The bulk of the assets to be transferred to the Buyers under the
Plan Sale Transactions are Consumer Creditor Agreements. The plan
calls for the Debtors to sell the assets to the Buyers pursuant to
section 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors assert that
because they are selling their Consumer Creditor Agreements through
the plan, and not pursuant to section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code,
and because section 363(o) applies only to "free and clear" sales
under section 363(f), they can transfer the agreements to the
Buyers "free and clear" of the Consumer Claims and Consumer
Defenses.

Judge James Garrity, Jr., of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York held that the Debtors have failed to
satisfy sections 1129(a)(1)-(3) to the extent that the Second
Amended Plan purports to limit the Consumer Creditors' ability to
assert rights of recoupment against the Buyers.

Judge Garrity further held that the Debtors have not demonstrated
that the Second Amended Plan satisfies the best interests of the
holders of allowed Class 6 claims and as such, they have failed to
satisfy section 1129(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Finally, Judge Garrity held that the Debtors have failed to
demonstrate that the Global Settlement is fair and equitable to the
holders of allowed Class 6 claims and as such, the Debtors' request
to enter into the agreement is denied.

For those reasons, the Court denied the Debtors' request to confirm
the Second Amended Plan.

A full-text copy of the Memorandum Decision is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y4xm5m4c from Epiq11.com at no charge.

                 About Ditech Holding Corporation

Ditech Holding Corporation and its subsidiaries --
http://www.ditechholding.com/-- are independent servicer and
originator of mortgage loans.  Based in Fort Washington,
Pennsylvania, the Debtors have approximately 3,300 employees and
service a diverse loan portfolio.

Ditech Holding and certain of its subsidiaries, including Ditech
Financial LLC and Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc., filed voluntary
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 19-10412) on
Feb. 11, 2019, after reaching terms with lenders of a Chapter 11
plan that will reduce debt by $800 million.

The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as legal counsel,
Houlihan Lokey as investment banker and AlixPartners LLP as
financial advisor.  Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC is the claims and
noticing agent.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP and FTI Consulting Inc. serve as the
consenting term lenders' legal counsel and financial advisor,
respectively.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' cases on Feb. 27, 2019.  The
creditors' committee tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as
its legal counsel and Goldin Associates, LLC, as its financial
advisor.

On May 2, 2019, the U.S. trustee appointed an official committee of
consumer creditors.  The consumers committee tapped Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, as counsel and TRS Advisors LLC, as
financial advisor.


DITECH HOLDING: Ombudsman Recommends Sale of Assets, Loans
----------------------------------------------------------
Elise S. Frejka, the consumer privacy ombudsman in the jointly
administered Chapter 11 cases of Ditech Holding Corporation and its
affiliated debtors filed a report to assist the Bankruptcy Court in
its consideration of the facts, circumstances and conditions of the
proposed sale of certain of the Debtor's assets related to its
forward business, including loan and servicing records containing
personally identifiable information to New Residential Investment
Corp. or its designee pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement by
and among Ditech Holding Corporation, Ditech Financial LLC and NRZ
dated June 17, 2019.

After a review of the facts and circumstances, the Ombudsman
recommended, from a consumer privacy perspective, that the
Bankruptcy Court approve the proposed sale and transfer of the
Debtors' assets and related loan files containing Personally
Identifiable Information, subject to continued compliance with
applicable federal and state law.

Both the Debtors' privacy policy and The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
("GLBA"), 15 U.S.C. Sections 6801-6827 (1999), which regulates the
privacy and security of consumer information provided to a mortgage
lender or servicer, generally prohibit the sharing of Personally
Identifiable Information and nonpublic personal information with
unaffiliated third parties. However, the Ombudsman pointed out that
GLBA contains a general exception that permits the disclosure of
nonpublic personal information to an unaffiliated third party in
connection with a sale to the extent that the disclosure is
necessary to administer a transaction authorized by a consumer.
The transfer of the mortgage loan files containing a borrower's
Personally Identifiable Information is therefore permissible as
this protected information is necessary to effectively administer
and service the Pipeline Loans and the MSR Loans, the Ombudsman
said.

A full-text copy of the Report is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y44yu2df from Epiq11.com at no charge.

The Ombudsman can be reached at:

     Elise S. Frejka, CIPP/US
     Consumer Privacy Ombudsman
     FREJKA PLLC
     420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 310
     New York, NY 10170
     Telephone: (212) 641-0800
     Facsimile: (212) 641-0820
     Email: efrejka@frejka.com

                About Ditech Holding Corporation

Ditech Holding Corporation and its subsidiaries --
http://www.ditechholding.com/-- are independent servicer and
originator of mortgage loans.  Based in Fort Washington,
Pennsylvania, the Debtors have approximately 3,300 employees and
service a diverse loan portfolio.

Ditech Holding and certain of its subsidiaries, including Ditech
Financial LLC and Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc., filed voluntary
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 19-10412) on
Feb. 11, 2019, after reaching terms with lenders of a Chapter 11
plan that will reduce debt by $800 million.

The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as legal counsel,
Houlihan Lokey as investment banker and AlixPartners LLP as
financial advisor.  Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC is the claims and
noticing agent.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP and FTI Consulting Inc. serve as the
consenting term lenders' legal counsel and financial advisor,
respectively.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' cases on Feb. 27, 2019.  The
creditors' committee tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as
its legal counsel and Goldin Associates, LLC, as its financial
advisor.

On May 2, 2019, the U.S. trustee appointed an official committee of
consumer creditors.  The consumers committee tapped Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, as counsel and TRS Advisors LLC, as
financial advisor.


DIVERSE LABEL: Committee Opposes Settlement of Cargill Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------
Diverse Label Printing, LLC, filed a Second Amended Plan of
Liquidation and accompanying Second Amended Disclosure Statement to
disclose additional information relating to the claims filed by
Cargill, Incorporated, and Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, and
the opposition of the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors'
opposition to the proposed settlement of the Cargill Claims.

The Debtor was not a party to the District Court litigation and no
judgment has been entered
against the Debtor with respect to the Cargill Claims.  Any amount
owed by the Debtor to Cargill pursuant to the Cargill Claims would
need to be litigated and established by Cargill in the Bankruptcy
Court.  The Liability Claims asserted by Cargill include claims
which are based upon alternate theories of recovery; namely,
facilitation of fraud, fraudulent transfer and successor
liability.

Pursuant to the settlement of the Cargill Claims, the Cargill
Claims shall be consolidated into Claim Number 47 and Claim Number
45 will be disallowed as a duplicate claim.  Claim Number 47 shall
be allowed as (i) a Class 1 Unsecured Claim in the amount of
$14,000,000, (ii) a Class 2 Subordinated Claim in the amount of
$26,818,142, and (iii) a Class 4 Penalty Claim in the amount of
$70,354,538.  Any recovery by Cargill on the Cargill Claims from a
source other than the Debtor's Estate shall be credited against
Cargill's allowed Class 2 Subordinated Claim.  Except for the
allowance of Claim Number 47, the Debtor, on behalf of itself and
the Estate, releases Cargill and Cargill releases the Debtor and
the Estate from any obligations, liabilities, causes of action,
damages, claims, and demands of any kind whatsoever, at law or in
equity, direct or indirect, known or unknown, discovered or
undiscovered, any element of which arose or accrued on or before
the entry of the Confirmation Order.  If the Plan is confirmed,
Cargill will support any objection filed by the Debtor seeking the
denial or subordination of the scheduled and filed claims of WDS,
Inc., ODDS,
LLC, RFS, Inc., Brian Ewert and Tracy Ewert ("Insider Claims").

The Committee said it has also analyzed the proposed settlement,
taking into consideration the strengths and weaknesses of Cargill's
Claims, the information and evidence available to defend or
subordinate the Cargill Claims, and the costs and risks of further
litigation.  The Committee said its assessment is different from
that of the Debtor.  The Committee believes that the compromise and
settlement set forth herein is unfair, unreasonable, and not in the
best interests of the Estate and its creditors.

Class 1: Unsecured Claims. Each holder of an Allowed Unsecured
Claim will receive its Pro Rata share of Available Cash.
Distributions to holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims shall be made
in one final installment on the date described in Section 13.3 of
the Plan.

Class 2: Subordinated Claims are impaired. Each holder of an
Allowed Subordinated Claim will receive its Pro Rata share of
Available Cash after the payment in full of the Class 1 Allowed
Unsecured Claims. Distributions to holders of Allowed Subordinated
Claims shall be made in one final installment on the date described
in Section 13.3.

Class 3: Late Filed Claims are impaired. Each holder of an Allowed
Late Filed Claim will receive its Pro Rata share of Available Cash
after the payment in full of the Class 1 Allowed Unsecured Claims
and the Class 2 Allowed Subordinated Claims. Distributions to
holders of Allowed Late Filed Claims shall be made in one final
installment on the date described in Section 13.3.

Class 4: Penalty Claims are impaired. Each holder of an Allowed
Penalty Claim will receive its Pro Rata share of Available Cash
after the payment in full of the Class 1 Allowed Unsecured Claims,
the Class 2 Allowed Subordinated Claims, and the Class 3 Allowed
Late Filed Claims. Distributions to holders of Allowed Penalty
Claims shall be made in one final installment on the date described
in Section 13.3.

Class 5: Equity Interests are impaired. The holders of Equity
Interests shall not receive or retain any property on account of
such Equity Interests under the Plan; provided however, in the
event all Allowed Claims have been paid in full to the extent
provided in the Plan, and there is Available Cash remaining for
distribution, then (i) holders of Allowed Claims shall be paid
interest at the legal rate on such Allowed Claims to the extent
necessary to pay each holder of any such Allowed Claim property of
a value, as of the Effective Date, equal to the allowed amount of
such claim, and (ii) any remaining Available Cash would be
distributed Pro Rata to the holders of Equity Interests.

The Debtor will use cash on hand and proceeds recovered or
generated from the liquidation of Assets and from causes of action
(including Bankruptcy Causes of Action) to fund payments as and to
the extent due under the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement dated
August 19, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y3nlfyu8 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for Debtor:

     John A. Northen, Esq.
     Vicki L. Parrott, Esq.
     Northen Blue, LLP
     Post Office Box 2208
     Chapel Hill, NC 27515-2208
     Tel: 919-968-4441
     Email: jan@nbfirm.com
            vlp@nbfirm.com

                About Diverse Label Printing

Diverse Label Printing, LLC, a company in Burlington, North
Carolina, specializes in producing labels for food, food
processing, supermarket, consumer goods, and other uses. Diverse
Label sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. M.D.N.C. Case No. 18-10792) on July 23, 2018.  In the
petition signed by CEO Ed Bidanset, the Debtor disclosed
$15,750,989 in assets and $10,499,186 in liabilities. Judge
Catharine R. Aron oversees the case.  The Debtor tapped Northen
Blue, LLP as its legal counsel, and Nelson & Company, PA as its
accountant.


DLJ INVESTMENTS: Oct. 2 Plan Confirmation Hearing
-------------------------------------------------
The Bankruptcy Court has approved the amended disclosure statement
explaining DLJ Investments, Ltd.'s Chapter 11 plan.  The disclosure
statement is approved, subject to the changes in the affidavit.

A confirmation hearing will be held on October 2, 2019 at 09:00 AM,
CENTRAL TIME.  September 23 is fixed as the last day for submitting
a ballot accepting or rejecting the plan.

Class 3 - Unsecured Claims are impaired. Unsecured claims against
the Debtor to the extent allowed under Section 502 of the Code.
These claims shall be paid pro rata from the sale of the Debtor’s
real and personal property, after payment in full of the
administrative and Class 1 claims. No interest shall accrue on
these claims from and after the Petition Date.

Class 1.01. - Secured claim of Madison County Treasurer, including
holders of tax certificates are impaired. Allowed secured claim of
the Madison County Treasurer (including holders of tax
certificates). This creditor shall be paid from the sale of the
Debtor's real property, after payment of selling and closing costs.
Post-petition interest shall be paid as required by state law.

Class 1.02. - Secured claim of Cass County Bank are impaired.
Allowed secured claim of Cass County Bank. This creditor shall be
paid from the sale of the Debtor's real and personal property.
Post-petition interest shall accrue at the non-default rate.

Class 1.03 - Secured Claim of CRS Mechanical of Nebraska, Inc. are
impaired. CRS Mechanical of Nebraska, Inc. This creditor shall be
paid from the sale of the Debtor's real personal property after
payment in full of the Class 1.01 and 1.20 claims. Post-petition
interest, if any, shall be paid at the non-default rate from and
after the Petition Date. This creditor shall retain the liens
securing its claim.

Class 1.04 - Secured Claim of CRS Mechanical, Inc. are impaired.
Allowed secured claim of CRS Mechanical, Inc. This creditor shall
be paid from the sale of the Debtor's real property after payment
in full of the Class 1.01, 1.02, and 1.03 claims. Post-petition
interest, if any, shall be paid at the non-default rate from and
after the Petition Date. This creditor shall retain the liens
securing its claims.

Payments will be made from the sale of the Debtor's real and
personal property.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated August
21, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y3huumo7 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

     ATTORNEYS FOR THE DEBTOR

     Kathryn J. Derr, Esq.
     1301 South 75th Street, Suite 100
     Omaha, Nebraska 68124
     Telephone: (402) 827-7000
     Facsimile: (402) 827-7001
     Email: kderr@berkshire-law.com

                   About DLJ Investments

Based in Omaha, Nebraska, DLJ Investments, LTD owns in fee simple a
real estate located at 1600 S Pine Rd Norfolk, NE 68701, having an
appraised value of $2.96 million.

The company filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Neb. Case No. 19-80494) on March 27, 2019, with total assets of
$4,368,171 and total liabilities of $4,593,106. The petition was
signed by Dean De Smet, general partner.


EPIC COMPANIES: In Chapter 11 to Sell to White Oak, Alliance
------------------------------------------------------------
Privately held Epic Companies, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection
with a deal to sell most of its assets in a transaction with
secured lender White Oak Global Advisors, LLC, and marine
transportation and well services provider Alliance Energy Services
LLC.

Epic is a full-service provider to the global decommissioning,
installation and maintenance markets.  As part of their operations,
the Debtors own heavy lift and diving vessels: the 1,600-metric-ton
world-class derrick barge DB Hedron, 726-metric-ton conventional
derrick barge DB Arapaho, and four-point anchor vessel EPIC
Explorer.  Additionally, the Debtors own various diving and well
services equipment.

The Debtors intend to market and sell their business as a going
concern.

Secured creditor White Oak Global Advisors, LLC, has signed a deal
to purchase, absent higher and better offers, the Debtors' assets
for a credit bid of $48,900,000 of its pre- and post-petition debt
and assume $40,000,000 of the indebtedness under the prepetition
second lien loan.

Upon closing of the sale of the assets, White Oak will then sell
certain of the assets to Alliance Energy Services, LLC, for a
purchase price of $40 million and an assumption of $35 million of
the indebtedness under the second lien loan.

The Debtors are targeting a 65-day sale process.  The Debtors have
proposed the following deadlines associated with the sale and
acceptance of rival bids:

  (i) Non-disclosure agreements deadline on Sept. 25, 2019 at 5:00
p.m. Central Time;
  
(ii) Bid deadline on Oct. 18, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. Central Time;

(iii) Auction on Oct. 22, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. Central Time at the
offices of Porter Hedges LLP, 1000 Main Street, 36th Floor,
Houston, Texas 77002; and

(iv) Sale Hearing on Oct. 25, 2019 at ______ Central Time.

                  Prepetition Capital Structure

The Debtors' prepetition capital structure is as follows:

   * $50,295,463 outstanding under a first lien restated senior
loan facility with White Oak, as administrative agent;

   * $65,340,299 outstanding under a second lien restated junior
loan facility, with Acqua Liana Capital Partners, LLC, as agent for
the lenders;

   * $30,000,000 in unsecured claims and other secured claims.

                          DIP Financing

To fund the Chapter 11 cases, White Oak has agreed to provide a
first priority priming senior secured delayed-draw term loan debtor
in possession credit facility of up to $9.5 million.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors only have total consolidated
liquidity consisting of $200,000 of cash and cash equivalents.

According to Kelton C. Tonn, legal officer of Epic Companies, had
Epic's prepetition secured lenders not agreed to finance the
Debtors' operations during the postpetition marketing period, the
Debtors would have been forced to terminate operations, lay off
their remaining employees and liquidate in the near term, thereby
resulting in irreparable consequences for its stakeholders.

                       About Epic Companies

Headquartered in Houston, Texas, Epic Companies, LLC, is a
full-service provider to the global decommissioning, installation
and maintenance markets.  Its services include heavy lift, diving
and marine, specialty cutting and well plugging and abandonment
services.  Epic has limited ongoing operations.

Epic is owned 50% by Orinoco and 50% by Oakridge Natural Resources,
LLC (c/o Thomas M. and Ann M. Clarke) and Oakridge Energy Partners
LLC (c/o David A. Wiley).

Epic Companies and six affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 19-34752) in Houston, Texas, on
Aug. 26, 2019.

Epic estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and liabilities
of $100 million to $500 million as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors tapped Porter Hedges LLP as bankruptcy counsel; S3
Advisors, LLC, as restructuring advisor; and Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC, as claims agent.


EPIC COMPANIES: Seeks Dismissal of Involuntary Chapter 7
--------------------------------------------------------
Epic Companies, LLC, and six affiliates filed voluntary Chapter 11
petitions on Aug. 26, 2019 in Houston, Texas, in response to an
involuntary Chapter 7 petition filed against it in New Orleans
(Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 19-12086) by alleged creditors.

The involuntary petition was filed Aug. 2, 2019, by Scurlock
Electric, L.L.C., Preferred Sandblasting, L.L.C., and Top Drive
Services, L.L.C.  Together, they alleged being owed $93,444.
Island Automation, Inc., and Gulf-Pro Services, L.L.C. filed
separate joinders to the petition.  Gulf-Pro asserts $23,206 in
claims while Island Automation asserts $39,861 in claims.  Epic is
the only proposed debtor in the involuntary.

Contemporaneously with the filing of the Debtors' voluntary
petitions, EPIC filed a motion to dismiss the involuntary case, or,
in the alternative, request the Louisiana bankruptcy court to
transfer venue of the EPIC involuntary case to the Houston Court.
The Louisiana bankruptcy court has not entered an order for relief
on the involuntary case.

The Petitioning Creditors have asked the Louisiana Court to
determine that the bankruptcy cases should proceed forward in the
Eastern District of Louisiana, rather than the Southern District of
Texas.

Attorney for the Petitioning Creditors:

     Mark C. Landry, Esq.
     NEWMAN, MATHIS, BRADY & SPEDALE
     A Professional Law Corporation
     433 Metairie Road, Suite 600
     Metairie, LA 70005
     Telephone: (504) 837-9040

                       About Epic Companies

Headquartered in Houston, Texas, Epic Companies, LLC, is a
full-service provider to the global decommissioning, installation
and maintenance markets.  Its services include heavy lift, diving
and marine, specialty cutting and well plugging and abandonment
services.  Epic has limited ongoing operations.

Epic is owned 50% by Orinoco and 50% by Oakridge Natural Resources,
LLC (c/o Thomas M. and Ann M. Clarke) and Oakridge Energy Partners
LLC (c/o David A. Wiley).

Epic Companies and six affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 19-34752) in Houston, Texas on Aug.
26, 2019.

Epic estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and liabilities
of $100 million to $500 million as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors tapped Porter Hedges LLP as bankruptcy counsel; S3
Advisors, LLC, as restructuring advisor; and Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC, as claims agent.



F-SQUARED INVESTMENT: Trustee Appeal Nixed for Lack of Jurisdiction
-------------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Leonard P. Stark granted the Defendants' motion to
dismiss the appeals case captioned CRAIG JALBERT, in his capacity
as Trustee for the F2 Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
ROOKER PRICE, ADAM GRAVES, BRIAN DOHERTY, JOHN GREG WHITAKER, KATE
KINLIN, LISA QUINN, MARK RAMUNNO, MICHAEL FARDY, NICOLE MILLER,
STEPHEN DEGNAN WALTER HARTFORD, WILLIAM McNAMARA, ZACHARY ZELTSAN,
SHANNON PRICE, EVGENY BURNAEV, ELENA ZARUBINA, ALEXEY PANCHEKHA,
EMILY MEYER, WILLIAM MONAHAN, SVITLANA SENENKO, ROBERT GOTTLIEB,
Defendants-Appellees, Civ. No. 18-1214 (LPS) (D. Del.).

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction with
respect to the appeal filed by plaintiff-appellant Craig Jalbert,
in his capacity as Trustee for the F2 Liquidating Trust from the
Bankruptcy Court's (i) Nov. 27, 2017 Order Granting in Part and
Denying in Part the Motion of the Trustee Extending Time to Effect
Service, and (ii) July 30, 2018 Order Granting in Part and Denying
in Part the Motion by Trustee for (A) Reconsideration of Order
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Motion of the Trustee
Extending Time to Effect Service and (B) Amended Relief.

The appeal arises from the Bankruptcy Court's denial in part of
Trustee's motion to extend the deadline to effect service under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), made applicable to the
adversary proceedings by Rule 7004(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure. Defendants-Appellees have moved to dismiss
the appeal on the basis that the Orders are interlocutory, Trustee
failed seek leave from the Court to appeal the interlocutory
Orders, and the appeal does not otherwise meet the criteria set
forth in 28 U.S.C. section 1292 for interlocutory review.

Reviewing the circumstances in this case in light of the
aforementioned factors and the pragmatic approach to finality of
bankruptcy court orders, the Court concludes that the Orders
denying extension of the 7004 Deadline are interlocutory. The
Orders do not implicate purely legal issues -- e.g., whether the
Bankruptcy Court must extend the 7004 Deadline upon a showing of
good cause -- rather, the Orders rest on Trustee's failure to
demonstrate non-service and good cause. Additionally, the Orders
leave additional work to be done by the Bankruptcy Court. While the
Bankruptcy Court has already denied Defendants-Appellees'
Cross-Motions and ruled that service of process is valid, it is
unclear whether Defendants-Appellees will prevail on
reconsideration of their argument concerning proper issuance of the
summons. The most important factor is the impact on the assets.
While the value of all 215 adversary proceedings is asserted by
Trustee to be $42 million, the value of Defendants-Appellees'
subset of the adversary proceedings is not set forth in the
pleadings. At this stage of the proceedings, and based on the
available record, the Court cannot discern what impact the Orders
may have on the estate. Finally, the Bankruptcy Court has reserved
jurisdiction under the Orders and is best positioned to rule on any
additional requests for extension of the 7004 Deadline, which
furthers judicial economy and weighs against a finding of finality
here.

Trustee argues that immediate appeal will materially advance
termination of litigation. "If permitted an extension of the 7004
Deadline, the Trustee would ensure effective service of process.
Eliminating the dispute over service of process would move this
litigation forward." With respect to exceptional circumstances,
Trustee asserts: "Consideration by this Court of the issue of
whether the Trustee is entitled to more time to effect service
would put to rest the issue of whether Defendants were properly
served, because the Trustee will have the ability to cure any
alleged defects of service that may exist and put to rest key
issues concerning the operation of Rule 4(m) in the bankruptcy
context." Additionally, "reversal of the Orders would make
Appellees' motion to reconsider moot."

Contrary to Trustee's assertions, Defendants-Appellees assert that
a reversal of the Orders and extension of the deadline for service
will not moot Defendants' motion for reconsideration of the
Memorandum denying their Cross-Motions concerning insufficient
service of process; the underlying service deficiency concerns the
valid issuance of summons, but service of the summons is secondary
to that argument (i.e., service cannot have been valid if the
summons was void). The Court agrees. Even assuming the Orders were
reversed, litigation over sufficiency of process will continue.

The Defendants' motion to dismiss the appeal is, therefore,
granted.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Order dated March 29, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2KXUTiJ from Leagle.com.

Craig Jalbert, in his Capacity as Trustee for F2 Liquidating Trust,
Appellant, represented by Frederick Brian Rosner , The Rosner Law
Group LLC & Jason Anthony Gibson , The Rosner Law Group LLC.

Kate Kinlin, Rooker Price, Adam Graves, Brian Doherty, John Greg
Whitaker, Mark Ramunno, Zachary Zeltsan, Lisa Quinn, Svitlana
Senenko, William Monahan, Emily Meyer, Robert Gottlieb, Alexey
Panchekha, Elena Zarubina, Evgeny Burnaev, Michael Fardy, Nicole
Miller, Stephen Degnan, Walter Hartford, Shannon Price & William
McNamara, Appellees, represented by Julia Bettina Klein , Klein
LLC.

                   About F-Squared Investment

Headquartered in Wellesley, MA, F-Squared Investments, Inc. --
http://www.f-squaredinvestments.com/-- is a privately owned
investment manager.  The firm primarily provides its services to
other investment advisers.  It also caters to individuals, high net
worth individuals, and pension and profit sharing plans.  The firm
provides index management services.  It manages separate
client-focused equity, fixed income, and multi-asset portfolios.
The firm invests in the public equity, fixed income, and
alternative investment markets across the globe.  It makes all its
investments through exchange-traded funds.  The firm invests in
small-cap stocks of companies across diversified sectors.

F-Squared Investment Management, LLC, and eight of its affiliates
filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
15-11469) on July 8, 2015.  Laura Dagan, president and chief
executive officer, signed the petitions.  The cases are assigned to
Laurie Selber Silverstein.

Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., serves as the Debtors' counsel.
Gennari Aronson, LLP, represents the Debtors as special corporate
counsel.  Grail Advisory Partners LLC (dba PL Advisors) and Managed
Account Services, LLC, act as the Debtors' financial advisors and
investment bankers.  Stillwater Advisory Group LLC is the Debtors'
crisis managers and restructuring advisors.  BMC Group, Inc., acts
as the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.


FALCON V: Sept. 30 Plan Confirmation Hearing
--------------------------------------------
Judge Douglas D. Dodd of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Louisiana approved the amended disclosure statement
explaining the amended Chapter 11 plan of Falcon V, L.L.C.

The court will hold a hearing on September 30, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.to
consider confirmation of the Amended Chapter 11 Plan.

Ballots accepting or rejecting the amended plan must be received
not later than September 25, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. Central Daylight
Time.  Objections to the amended plan and supporting memoranda must
be filed not later than September 24, 2019.

For reasons orally assigned, the court directed the Debtor to file
a final version of the Amended Disclosure Statement for approval.
The amended disclosure statement contained immaterial
modifications, according to the Debtor.

CLASS 3 - GENERAL UNSECURED CLAIMS (OTHER THAN TRADE CLAIMS AND THE
ANGELO GORDON CLAIM) are impaired. Each such Holder shall on the
Effective Date or, if such Claim is not Allowed as of the Effective
Date, as soon as practicable after such Claim becomes Allowed
receive its Pro Rata Share (determined exclusive of Prepetition
Lender Deficiency Claims but inclusive of the Class 4 Claims and in
each case without interest) of (i) the Creditors Trust Beneficial
Interests and (ii) the Class 3 Warrant Share.

CLASS 4 - ANGELO GORDON CLAIM are impaired. Each such Holder shall
for the benefit of the Holders of the Prepetition Lender Deficiency
Claims, receive its Pro Rata share (determined inclusive of the
Class 3 Claims and in each case without interest) of (i) the
beneficial interests in the Falcon Creditors Trust and (ii) the
Warrants.

The Reorganized Debtors will fund the Class 2 Cash Distribution
Account, and any other Cash Plan Distributions with Cash on hand,
including Cash from operations and borrowing under the DIP Credit
Agreement, and, as necessary under the Exit Facility.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement dated
August 19, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y6cy4zj9 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement dated
August 16, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y5qkyy6a from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtors:

     Louis M. Phillips, Esq.
     Patrick "Rick" M. Shelby, Esq.
     Amelia L. Bueche, Esq.
     KELLY HART PITRE
     One American Place
     301 Main Street, Suite 1600
     Baton Rouge, LA 70801-1916
     Telephone: (225) 381-9643

                      About Falcon V

Falcon V and ORX Resources are engaged in the oil and gas
extraction business.

Falcon V and ORX Resources have filed voluntary petitions seeking
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. La.
Case No. 19-10547 and 19-10548) on April 10, 2019. The petitions
were signed by James E. Orth, president and chief executive
officer.

At the time of filing, Falcon V estimated $10 million to $50
million in assets and  $50 million to $100 million in liabilities
and ORX Resources estimated $100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $10
million to $50 million in liabilities.

Louis M. Phillips, Esq., at Kelly Hart & Pitre, represents the
Debtor as counsel.             

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on May 21, 2019.


FC GLOBAL: Change of Auditor Causes 10-Q Filing Delay
-----------------------------------------------------
FC Global Realty Incorporated was unable to file its quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2019 within the
prescribed time period because of a recent change in its
independent auditor firm.  On Aug. 8, 2019, the Company announced
that it had changed its independent auditors from Fahn Kanne & Co.
Grant Thornton Israel to Friedman LLP.  As a result, Friedman
requires additional time in which to conduct and complete its
review of the Company's current financial statements and its
assessment of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.  The Company does not currently expect to file its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q by the prescribed due date allowed
pursuant to Rule 12b-25.

                      About FC Global Realty

Formerly known as PhotoMedex, Inc., FC Global Realty Incorporated
-- http://www.fcglobalrealty.com/-- has recently transitioned to a
company focused on real estate development and asset management,
concentrating primarily on investments in, and the management and
development of, income producing real estate assets.  The Company
is headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona.

FC Global reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders
and participating securities of $4.66 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss attributable to common
stockholders and participating securities of $19.38 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of March 31, 2019, the Company had
$4.17 million in total assets, $4.79 million in total liabilities,
and a total stockholders' deficit of $622,000.

Fahn Kanne & Co. Grant Thornton Israel, in Tel Aviv, Israel, issued
a "going concern" opinion in its report dated April 1, 2019, on the
Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec.
31, 2018, citing that the Company has incurred net losses for each
of the years ended Dec. 31, 2018 and 2017 and has not yet generated
any significant revenues from real estate activities.  As of Dec.
31, 2018, there is an accumulated deficit of $139.7 million.  These
conditions, along with other matters, raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


FC GLOBAL: Changes Its Name to "Gadsden Properties, Inc."
---------------------------------------------------------
FC Global Realty Incorporated filed an Amendment to its Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of
State to, among other things (i) change the name of the Company to
"Gadsden Properties, Inc."; (ii) increase the number of authorized
shares of the Company's Common Stock from 500,000,000 shares to
5,000,000,000 shares; and (iii) add certain provisions restricting
ownership and transfer of shares to comply with requirements under
the Internal Revenue Code for a real estate investment trust.  At
this time, the Company will continue to trade its stock under the
symbol "FCRE" on the OTC Pink Sheets.  The Company anticipates
changing that symbol in the near future.

          Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer of Shares

Although the Company is not currently a REIT, it intends to qualify
as a REIT for U.S. Federal income tax purposes commencing with its
taxable year ending Dec. 31, 2020.  In order to qualify as a REIT
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the Company's
stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at
least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months (other than the first
year for which an election to be a REIT has been made) or during a
proportionate part of a shorter taxable year; and at any time
during the last half of a taxable year (other than the first year
for which an election to be a REIT has been made), not more than
50% of the value of the outstanding shares of stock (after taking
into account options to acquire shares of stock) may be owned,
directly, indirectly or through attribution, by five or fewer
individuals (for this purpose, the term "individual" under the Code
includes a supplemental unemployment compensation benefit plan, a
private foundation or a portion of a trust permanently set aside or
used exclusively for charitable purposes, but generally does not
include a qualified pension plan or profit sharing trust).

The Amendment contains restrictions on ownership and transfer of
the Company's stock that are intended, among other purposes, to
assist the Company in complying with these requirements to qualify
and thereafter continue to qualify as a REIT.  These restrictions
will be effective commencing on the date on which a registration
statement on Form S-11 is declared effective by the SEC and until
the Company's board of directors determines that it is no longer in
the best interests of the Company to attempt to, or continue to,
qualify as a REIT, or that compliance with the restrictions and
limitations on ownership and transfers is no longer required in
order for the Company to qualify as a REIT.

These limitations include that, subject to the exceptions in the
discretion of the board of directors, no person or entity may
actually or beneficially own, or be deemed to own by virtue of the
applicable constructive ownership provisions of the Code, more than
the Applicable Amount, or other applicable amount given any
ownership in excess of such amount that has been approved by the
board of directors, of the outstanding shares of Common Stock,
Preferred Stock or more than the Applicable Amount of the aggregate
of the outstanding shares of all classes and series of stock.
These restrictions are referred to as an "ownership limit" and
collectively as the "ownership limits."  A person or entity that
would have acquired actual, beneficial or constructive ownership of
stock but for the application of the ownership limits or any of the
other restrictions on ownership and transfer of stock discussed
below is referred to as a "prohibited owner."  Under the provisions
of the Amendment, the term "Applicable Amount" is defined to be not
more than 9.8% (in value or in number of shares, whichever is more
restrictive) of the aggregate of the outstanding shares of capital
stock, or such other percentage determined by the board of
directors.

The constructive ownership rules under the Code are complex and may
cause stock owned actually or constructively by a group of related
individuals and/or entities to be owned constructively by one
individual or entity.  As a result, the acquisition of less than
the Applicable Amount of Common Stock (or the acquisition of an
interest in an entity that owns, actually or constructively, Common
Stock) by an individual or entity could, nevertheless, cause that
individual or entity, or another individual or entity, to own
constructively in excess of the Applicable Amount of outstanding
Common Stock and thereby violate the applicable ownership limit.

The board of directors may increase or decrease the ownership
limits, except that a decreased ownership limit will not be
effective for any person whose actual, beneficial or constructive
ownership of stock exceeds the decreased ownership limit at the
time of the decrease until the person's actual, beneficial or
constructive ownership of stock equals or falls below the decreased
ownership limit, although any further acquisition of stock will
violate the decreased ownership limit.  The board may not increase
or decrease any ownership limit if the new ownership limit would
cause the Company to fail to qualify as a REIT.

These provisions further prohibit:

   * any person from actually, beneficially or constructively
     owning shares of stock that could result in the Company
     being "closely held" under Section 856(h) of the Code
    (without regard to whether the ownership interest is held
     during the last half of a taxable year) or otherwise cause
     the Company to fail to qualify as a REIT (including, but not
     limited to, actual, beneficial or constructive ownership of
     shares of stock that could result in (i) the Company owning
    (actually or constructively) an interest in a tenant that is
     described in Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the Code, or (ii) any
     manager of a "qualified lodging facility" within the meaning
     of Section 856(d)(9)(D) of the Code or a "qualified health
     care facility" within the meaning of Section 856(e)(6)(D)(i)
     of the Code, leased by the Company to one of its taxable
     REIT subsidiaries failing to qualify as an "eligible
     independent contractor" within the meaning of Section 856(d)
    (9)(A) of the Code, in each case if the income derived from
     such tenant or such taxable REIT subsidiary, taking into
     account the Company's other income that would not qualify
     under the gross income requirements of Section 856(c) of the
     Code, would cause the Company to fail to satisfy any the
     gross income requirements imposed on REITs); and

   * any person from transferring shares of stock if such
     transfer would result in shares of the Company's stock being
     beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons (determined
     under the principles of Section 856(a)(5) of the Code).

Any person who acquires or attempts or intends to acquire actual,
beneficial or constructive ownership of shares of stock that will
or may violate the ownership limits or any of the other
restrictions on ownership and transfer of stock described above
must give written notice immediately to the Company or, in the case
of a proposed or attempted transaction, provide the Company at
least 15 days prior written notice, and provide the Company with
such other information as it may request in order to determine the
effect of such transfer on the Company's status as a REIT.

Pursuant to the Amendment, if any purported transfer of stock or
any other event would otherwise result in any person violating the
ownership limits or such other limit established by the board, or
could result in the Company being "closely held" within the meaning
of Section 856(h) of the Code (without regard to whether the
ownership interest is held during the last half of a taxable year)
or otherwise failing to qualify as a REIT, then the number of
shares causing the violation (rounded up to the nearest whole
share) will be automatically transferred to, and held by, a trust
for the exclusive benefit of one or more charitable organizations
selected by the Company.  The prohibited owner will have no rights
in shares of the stock held by the trustee.  The automatic transfer
will be effective as of the close of business on the business day
prior to the date of the violative transfer or other event that
results in the transfer to the trust.  Any dividend or other
distribution paid to the prohibited owner, prior to the Company's
discovery that the shares had been automatically transferred to a
trust as described above, must be repaid to the trustee upon
demand.  In addition, the board is authorized to take such actions
as it deems necessary or advisable in preserving the Company's
qualification as a REIT.

Shares of stock transferred to the trustee are deemed offered for
sale to the Company, or its designee, at a price per share equal to
the lesser of (i) the price per share in the transaction that
resulted in the transfer of shares to the trust (or, if the event
that resulted in the transfer to the trust did not involve a
purchase of such shares at market price, the market price of such
shares on the day of the event that resulted in the transfer of
such shares to the trust) and (ii) the market price on the date the
Company, or its designee, accepts such offer.  The Company will be
required to reduce the amount payable to the prohibited owner by
the amount of dividends and other distributions paid to the
prohibited owner and owed by the prohibited owner to the trustee.
The Company will pay the amount of such reduction to the trustee
for the benefit of the charitable beneficiary.  The Company will
have the right to accept such offer until the trustee has sold the
shares of stock held in the trust.  Upon a sale to the Company, the
interest of the charitable beneficiary in the shares sold
terminates and the trustee must distribute the net proceeds of the
sale to the prohibited owner and any dividends or other
distributions held by the trustee with respect to such stock will
be paid to the charitable beneficiary.

If the Company does not buy the shares, the trustee must, within 20
days of receiving notice from the Company of the transfer of shares
to the trust, sell the shares to a person or persons, designated by
the trustee, who could own the shares without violating the
ownership limits or other restrictions on ownership and transfer of
the Company's stock.  Upon such sale, the trustee must distribute
to the prohibited owner an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the
price paid by the prohibited owner for the shares (or, in the event
of a gift, devise or other such transaction, the last sales price
reported on the applicable stock market or exchange on the day of
the transfer or other event that resulted in the transfer of such
shares to the trust) and (ii) the market price on the date that the
trustee, or its designee, accepts such offer.  The trustee will
reduce the amount payable to the prohibited owner by the amount of
dividends and other distributions paid to the prohibited owner and
owed by the prohibited owner to the trustee.  Any net sales
proceeds in excess of the amount payable to the prohibited owner
will be immediately paid to the charitable beneficiary, together
with any dividends or other distributions thereon.  In addition,
if, prior to discovery by the Company that shares of stock have
been transferred to the trustee, such shares of stock are sold by a
prohibited owner, then such shares shall be deemed to have been
sold on behalf of the trust and, to the extent that the prohibited
owner received an amount for or in respect of such shares that
exceeds the amount that such prohibited owner was entitled to
receive, such excess amount shall be paid to the trustee upon
demand.

The trustee will be designated by the Company and will be
unaffiliated with any prohibited owner.  Prior to the sale of any
shares by the trust, the trustee will receive, in trust for the
charitable beneficiary, all dividends and other distributions paid
by the Company with respect to such shares, and may exercise all
voting rights with respect to such shares for the exclusive benefit
of the charitable beneficiary.

Every owner of 5% or more (or such lower percentage as required by
the Code or the U.S. Treasury Department regulations promulgated
thereunder) of the outstanding shares of the Company's stock,
within 30 days after the end of each taxable year, must give
written notice to the Company stating the name and address of such
owner, the number of shares of each class and series of its stock
that the owner beneficially owns and a description of the manner in
which the shares are held. Each such owner also must provide the
Company with any additional information that it requests in order
to determine the effect, if any, of the person's actual or
beneficial ownership on the Company's status as a REIT and to
ensure compliance with the ownership limits.  In addition, any
person that is an actual, beneficial or constructive owner of
shares of the Company's stock and any person (including the
stockholder of record) who is holding shares of its stock for an
actual, beneficial or constructive owner must, on request, disclose
to the Company such information as it may request in good faith in
order to determine the Company's status as a REIT and comply with
requirements of any taxing authority or governmental authority or
determine such compliance.

The Company's board of directors may exercise the discretion noted
above during the period that the Company is not qualified as a REIT
so that it is able to qualify as a REIT commencing on the taxable
year that the board of directors so determines that the Company
should elect to be taxed as a REIT.

                       About FC Global Realty

Formerly known as PhotoMedex, Inc., FC Global Realty Incorporated
-- http://www.fcglobalrealty.com/-- has recently transitioned to a
company focused on real estate development and asset management,
concentrating primarily on investments in, and the management and
development of, income producing real estate assets.  The Company
is headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona.

FC Global reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders
and participating securities of $4.66 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss attributable to common
stockholders and participating securities of $19.38 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of March 31, 2019, the Company had
$4.17 million in total assets, $4.79 million in total liabilities,
and a total stockholders' deficit of $622,000.

Fahn Kanne & Co. Grant Thornton Israel, in Tel Aviv, Israel, issued
a "going concern" opinion in its report dated April 1, 2019, on the
Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec.
31, 2018, citing that the Company has incurred net losses for each
of the years ended Dec. 31, 2018 and 2017 and has not yet generated
any significant revenues from real estate activities.  As of Dec.
31, 2018, there is an accumulated deficit of $139.7 million.  These
conditions, along with other matters, raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


FIRST BAPTIST HOUSING: Sept. 10 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
---------------------------------------------------------------
The hearing to consider approval of the Disclosure Statement
explaining the Chapter 11 Plan of First Baptist Housing Development
Corporation II is scheduled on September 10, 2019 at 10:00 AM, in
300 Fayetteville Street, 3rd Floor Courtroom, Raleigh, NC 27602.
September 4, 2019 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the Disclosure Statement.

                 About First Baptist Housing

First Baptist Housing Development Corporation and First Baptist
Housing Development Corporation II filed voluntary Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case Nos. 18-05719 and 18-05720) on
November 28, 2018.

The Debtors are lessors of real estate headquartered in Lumberton,
North Carolina.  First Baptist Housing Development Corporation is
the fee simple owner of a property located at 40 Marion Road
Lumberton, NC, having a current value of $746,200.  First Baptist
Housing Development

Corporation II is the fee simple owner of a property located at 40
Marion Road Lumberton, NC, with a tax records valuation of $1.12
million.

The cases are assigned to Hon. David M. Warren.

The Debtors' counsel is William H. Kroll, Esq., at Stubbs & Perdue,
P.A., in Raleigh, North Carolina, and Trawick H. Stubbs, Jr., Esq.,
at at Stubbs & Perdue, P.A., in New Bern, North Carolina.


FOREVER 21: Reportedly Preparing for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
----------------------------------------------------------
Teen clothing store chain Forever 21 Inc. is preparing for a
potential bankruptcy filing as its turnaround options fade,
Bloomberg reported, citing people with knowledge of the plans.

According to Bloomberg, Forever 21 hired a team of advisers to help
restructure its debt and has been in talks for additional
financing, but negotiations with possible lenders have stalled.

Forever 21 is now looking to secure a potential
debtor-in-possession financing to take the company into Chapter 11,
even as some window remains to strike a last-minute deal, the
Bloomberg report added.

A bankruptcy filing could leave many of the retailer's more than
800 locations in limbo, as it would allow the discount fashion
chain to shed struggling shops, sources told Bloomberg.

According to USA Today, Eric Snyder, a partner at New York-based
law firm Wilk Auslander, said the immediate issue is with word of
the bankruptcy leaking out credit will dry up until they secure a
debtor-in-possession financing.

"With 815 stores, many in undesirable malls, a bankruptcy filing
gives Forever 21 the leverage to either renegotiate rents, which
landlords are more than willing to do in this retail environment,
or reject leases and free itself of liability for unprofitable
stores," said Snyder, who is chairman of the firm's bankruptcy
department.

Through August 22, 2019, U.S. retailers have announced 7,888 store
closures, according to Coresight Research.  This compares to 5,844
closures for the full year 2018.  Coresight Research estimates
announced U.S. store closures could reach 12,000 by the end of
2019.

                         About Forever 21

Forever 21, Inc., headquartered in Los Angeles, California --
http://www.forever21.com/-- is a fashion retailer of women's,
men's and kids clothing and accessories and is known for offering
the hottest, most current fashion trends at a great value to
consumers.  This model operates by keeping the store exciting with
new merchandise brought in daily.  Founded in 1984, Forever 21
operates more than 815 stores in 57 countries with retailers in the
United States, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany,
Hong Kong, India, Israel, Japan, Korea, Latin America, Mexico,
Philippines and United Kingdom.

Privately held Forever 21 is owned by its founders, Do Won and Jin
Sook Chang.  A husband and wife team, the Changs immigrated from
South Korea in 1981 and started the chain three years later with a
single 900 square-foot store in Los Angeles and only $11,000 in
savings.

Forever 21 has annual sales of $3.4 billion and 30,000 employees.



FOX VALLEY PRO: Seeks to Hire Kerkman & Dunn as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fox Valley Pro Basketball seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin to hire Kerkman & Dunn
as its legal counsel.

The firm will provide services in connection with the Debtor's
Chapter 11 case, which include legal advice regarding its powers
and duties under the Bankruptcy Code; negotiations with creditors;
the preparation of a bankruptcy plan; and assistance with respect
to any potential sale of its assets.

The hourly rates for the firm's attorneys are:

     Jerome Kerkman      $425
     Evan Schmit         $375
     Gregory Schrieber   $350
     Nicholas Kerkman    $225

Non-attorney paraprofessionals charge between $100 and $150 per
hour.

Kerkman & Dunn is "disinterested" within the meaning of Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jerome R. Kerkman, Esq.
     Kerkman & Dunn
     839 N. Jefferson St., Suite 400
     Milwaukee, WI 53202-3744
     Phone: 414.277.8200
     Facsimile: 414.277.0100
     Email: jkerkman@kerkmandunn.com

                  About Fox Valley Pro Basketball

Fox Valley Pro Basketball Inc. is the owner of the Menominee Nation
Arena in Oshkosh, Wis.  The Arena serves as the home of the
Wisconsin Herd of the NBA G League and the Wisconsin Glow women's
basketball team.

Fox Valley Pro Basketball sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Wis. Case No. 19-28025) on Aug. 19,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of
between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities of the same
range.  The case is assigned to Judge Brett H. Ludwig.  Kerkman &
Dunn is the Debtor's counsel.


FRESH MARKET: Moody's Alters Outlook on Caa2 CFR to Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service changed the outlook for The Fresh Market,
Inc. to Stable from Negative. Moody's also affirmed the company's
Corporate Family Rating and Probability of Default rating at Caa2
and Caa2-PD respectively. Additionally Moody's affirmed the rating
of the company's $800 million senior secured notes at Caa2.

"Fresh Market's topline and EBITDA has demonstrated some
improvement and we expect credit metrics to improve modestly in the
next 12 months," Moody's Vice President Mickey Chadha stated.
"However, the increasingly competitive and promotional business
environment and pricing pressure from larger and better performing
competitors in the company's geographic footprint will make any
major improvement in profitability difficult to come by and the
risk of a distressed exchange remains high," Chadha further
stated.

Affirmations:

Issuer: Fresh Market, Inc. (The)

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Caa2-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Caa2

  Senior Secured Notes, Affirmed Caa2 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Fresh Market, Inc. (The)

  Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Fresh Market Inc.'s Caa2 Corporate Family Rating reflects the
company's high leverage, relatively small scale, increasing
competition, current unsustainable capital structure, geographic
concentration in the Southeast and a possibility of a distressed
exchange given the depressed trading levels of the company's senior
secured notes. Moody's estimates debt/EBITDA and EBIT/interest for
the fiscal year ending January 2020 will be about 7.3 times and
below 1.0 time respectively (including Moody's standard lease
adjustments). Management has undertaken a number of strategic
initiatives to improve operating performance including price
investments, and the emphasis on higher quality meats and fresh
produce and perishables which have resulted in improving same store
sales and average customer transaction size. The company also
closed 15 unprofitable stores in 2018. However, margin improvement
will be challenging in the price competitive business environment.
Moody's expects same store sales to be flat to modestly negative
for the remainder of the current fiscal year as the transaction
count continues to trend negative offsetting any improvement in
transaction size. In addition to the volatility in financial
policies inherent with ownership by a financial sponsor, its
ratings also reflect the execution risks associated with
management's turnaround plan which continues to be challenging to
implement in an increasingly competitive pricing and business
environment.

Ratings also reflect The Fresh Market's attractive market niche and
its above average income demographic which is more resilient to
economic slowdowns and is less price sensitive. The company's
liquidity is adequate with a $50 million unsecured revolving credit
facility provided by the sponsor and about $112 million of
unrestricted cash on the balance sheet at April 28, 2019. The
company replaced its original $100 million revolving credit
facility with $125 million super priority senior secured notes
maturing 2022. Proceeds from these notes issued in March 2018
bolstered the company's cash balance. While the cash balance is a
positive, Moody's expects the company to continue to burn cash in
the next 12 months thereby lowering cash balances. EBITDA
improvement for the remainder of the fiscal year will be modest and
the company will need this liquidity for seasonal working capital
needs during the peak holiday season.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that credit metrics
and profitability will improve modestly in the next 12 months and
liquidity will remain adequate.

Ratings could be upgraded if the company's capital structure
becomes sustainable, operating performance improves such that same
store sales growth becomes consistently positive accompanied with
margin stability. In addition, an upgrade would require maintaining
adequate liquidity. Quantitatively, an upgrade would require
sequential improvement in debt/EBITDA and EBIT/interest towards
7.25 times and 1.0 times, respectively in the next 12 months.

Ratings could be downgraded if operating performance does not
improve and negative trends in same store sales and operating
margins continue such that debt/EBITDA is sustained above 8.0 times
or EBIT/interest does not demonstrate any improvement towards 1
times. Ratings may also be downgraded if liquidity erodes or
financial policies become aggressive.

The Fresh Market, Inc. is a specialty grocery retailer. Proforma
for the recently announced store closures the Company operates 161
stores in 22 states across the United States. The company is owned
by Apollo Global Management, LLC. Revenues for the LTM period
ending April 28, 2019 totaled $1.6 billion.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail Industry
published in May 2018.


FUELCELL ENERGY: Names Jason Few as New President and CEO
---------------------------------------------------------
FuelCell Energy, Inc. has appointed Jason Few as its new president
and chief executive officer, effective as of Aug. 26, 2019.  Mr.
Few joined the FuelCell Energy Board of Directors in November 2018.
Few, along with the Company's executive leadership team, will be
responsible for the revitalization and advancement of FuelCell
Energy, including its ongoing restructuring efforts, its efforts to
enhance commercial activity, and its efforts to improve operational
effectiveness.

Mr. Few has over 30 years of experience increasing enterprise value
for global Fortune 500 companies, as well as privately held
technology, telecommunication, and energy firms.  In his past
experience as a president and CEO, Few has developed strategic
plans to capture growth, architected a billion-dollar turnaround,
divested non-core assets, built and developed leadership teams,
deleveraged balance sheets, invested in new capabilities,
reinvigorated the brand and strengthened customer relationships.
Through his work on public, private and nonprofit boards, he brings
deep corporate governance experience, capital allocation
discipline, and the ability to ensure strategic alignment.

Commenting on his appointment, Mr. Few said "It is a privilege to
be asked by the Board to lead FuelCell Energy through its continued
transformation.  FuelCell Energy is well positioned to fully
participate in the global clean energy future.  FuelCell Energy has
a fantastic business, a talented team and market leading clean
energy technology."  Mr. Few, age 53, previously served as
president of Sustayn Analytics, a data visualization and analytics
company focused on the waste and recycling industries.  James H.
England, chairman of the FuelCell Energy Board, added "Jason has
been an important contributor during his time on the Board of
Directors, significantly bolstering our efforts to strengthen the
Company and put FuelCell Energy in a position to deliver on its $2
billion backlog.  Speaking on behalf of the entire Board of
Directors, we are pleased to have Jason's commercial and leadership
experiences driving the Company forward and are excited to work
with Jason as the President and Chief Executive Officer."

Mr. Few added, "During the balance of the calendar year, our team
will be focused on executing in a number of critical strategic
areas.  At the highest level, we certainly want to reinvigorate our
customer relationships and the FuelCell Energy brand and to promote
fuel cells as a solution going forward in the global clean energy
space.  More tactically, domestically, we are focusing on
reinvigorating our sales efforts, including a renewed focus on
behind-the-meter opportunities.  We recently discussed our relaunch
of our sub-megawatt solution in Europe, and this is expected to be
part of a broader effort to re-engage the international markets,
including Asia and Europe.  We also plan to continue to develop
fuel cell technology for major advanced technology initiatives,
especially in the area of carbon capture, collaborating with third
parties on funded programs.  We also intend to instill a culture
based around lean principles, focus on operational effectiveness,
maintain our focus on fiscal discipline, and continue to work to
optimize our capital structure.  Lastly, we plan to make FuelCell
Energy a vibrant place to work, one where our team members can take
pride in what they accomplish and grow professionally.
Collectively, these will build the foundation of a stronger, more
successful FuelCell Energy going forward."

Mr. Few will continue to serve on the board of FuelCell Energy as a
non-independent director.  The FuelCell Energy Board is currently
evaluating its composition given Mr. Few's appointment, and expects
to expand its membership in the coming months.  He also serves on
the boards of Marathon Oil Corporation (MRO), Memorial Hermann
Health System, and the American Heart Association.

Jennifer Arasimowicz will remain in her role as general counsel,
corporate secretary, executive vice president, and chief commercial
officer, and, along with the Company's Executive Vice President,
Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer, Michael Bishop, the
Company's Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer,
Michael Lisowski, and the Company's Executive Vice President and
Chief Technology Officer, Anthony Leo, will report directly to Mr.
Few.  The roles of Chief Restructuring Officer, held by Laura
Marcero, and Deputy Chief Restructuring Officer, held by Lee
Sweigart, will remain, and, effective as of Aug. 26, 2019, they
will report to both the Board of Directors and Mr. Few, as chief
executive officer of the Company.

In connection with Mr. Few's appointment, on Aug. 19, 2019, the
Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Few, which is
effective as of Aug. 26, 2019.  The Employment Agreement provides
that Mr. Few will receive a base salary of $475,000 per year,
subject to periodic review and potential adjustment by the
Compensation Committee of the Board and, beginning with the
Company's fiscal year 2020, he will be eligible to participate in
the Company's annual cash incentive plans and programs that are
generally provided to the senior executives of the Company, with a
target bonus equal to no less than 90% of base salary.  For the
portion of the Company's 2019 fiscal year following the Effective
Date, Mr. Few will be eligible to receive a pro rata portion of the
target bonus amount (based on the number of days that he is
employed during the fiscal year) to the extent the three milestone
goals the Company's other executive officers are required to
achieve to receive the cash incentive awards pursuant to the letter
agreements entered into in July 2019 are achieved, as determined by
the Committee.

Mr. Few will also receive a signing bonus of $500,000, 50% of which
will be paid immediately and 50% of which will be paid in 2020,
subject to and following the Board's approval of a business plan
for the Company's fiscal year 2020.  The signing bonus is subject
to repayment, on a pro-rated basis, if, within 18 months after the
Effective Date, the Company terminates Mr. Few's employment for
"cause", or Mr. Few terminates his employment other than for "good
reason" or other than on account of his death or disability.

Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. Few will receive an award of
500,000 restricted stock units, contingent on stockholder approval
of a sufficient number of additional shares under the FuelCell
Energy, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan.  The Initial RSU Award
will vest on the third anniversary of the Effective Date if Mr. Few
remains employed through the vesting date, or if the Company
earlier terminates his employment without cause or Mr. Few
terminates his employment for good reason.  Mr. Few will be
eligible to receive additional restricted stock units under the
Initial RSU Award if, during the 30 days prior to the vesting date,
the weighted average price of the Company's common stock exceeds
$1.00.  The number of additional restricted stock units will range
from zero for a weighted average price of $1.00 to a maximum of
500,000 units for a weighted average price of $6.00, with linear
interpolation for stock prices between $1.00 and $6.00.

                       About FuelCell Energy

FuelCell Energy, Inc. -- http://www.fuelcellenergy.com/-- provides
comprehensive turn-key power generation solutions to its customers,
including power plant installation, operations and maintenance
under multi-year power purchase and service agreements.  The
Company designs, manufactures, undertakes project development of,
install, operate and maintain megawatt-scale fuel cell systems,
serving utilities and industrial and large municipal power users
with solutions that include both utility-scale and on-site power
generation, carbon capture, local hydrogen production for
transportation and industry, and long duration energy storage.

FuelCell reported a net loss to common stockholders of $62.16
million for the year ended Oct. 31, 2018, following a net loss to
common stockholders of $57.10 million for the year ended Dec. 31,
2017.  As of April 30, 2019, the Company had $341.2 million in
total assets, $207.82 million in total liabilities, $59.85 million
in redeemable series B preferred stock, $3.16 million in redeemable
series C preferred stock, $20.54 million in redeemable series D
preferred stock, and $49.83 million in total stockholders' equity.

                         Bankruptcy Warning

As of April 30, 2019, the Company had an accumulated deficit from
recurring net losses for the current and prior years.  The Company
said these factors as well as negative cash flows from operating
and investing activities and negative working capital raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.

Fuelcell Energy had warned it may be required to delay, reduce
and/or cease its operations and/or seek bankruptcy protection if
the Company is unable to obtain external financing, according to
the Company's Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 12, 2019.


FUSION CONNECT: Committee Taps AlixPartners as Financial Advisor
----------------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Fusion Connect,
Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York to hire AlixPartners, LLP as its
financial advisor.

The firm will provide these services to the committee in connection
with the Chapter 11 cases filed by the company and its
subsidiaries:

     (a) Review and evaluate the Debtors' current financial
condition, business plans, and cash and financial forecasts.

     (b) Review the Debtors' cash management, tax sharing and
intercompany accounting systems, practices and procedures,
including intercompany transactions with non-debtor affiliates.

     (c) Review, investigate and analyze: (i) related party
transactions, including those between the Debtor and non-debtor
subsidiaries and affiliates and (ii) selected other pre-bankruptcy
transactions.

     (d) Identify and review potential preference payments,
fraudulent conveyances and other causes of action that the Debtors'
estates may hold against third parties.

     (e) Analyze the Debtors' assets and claims, and assess
potential recoveries to the various creditor constituencies under
different scenarios in coordination with any investment banker
retained by the committee.

     (f) Evaluate the Debtors' proposed sale process and any
related bids and participate in any meeting with bidders or
auction.

     (g) Assist in the development or review of the Debtors' plan
of reorganization and disclosure statement.

     (h) Review and evaluate court motions filed or to be filed by
the Debtors or any party.

     (i) Render expert testimony and litigation support service.

     (j) Attend committee meetings and court hearings.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Managing Director     $990 – $1,165
     Director                $775 – $945
     Senior Vice President   $615 – $725
     Vice President          $440 – $600
     Consultant              $160 – $435
     Paraprofessional        $285 – $305

David MacGreevey, managing director of AlixPartners, disclosed in
court filings that the firm is "disinterested" within the meaning
of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

AlixPartners can be reached through:

     David MacGreevey
     AlixPartners, LLP
     909 Third Avenue, Floor 30
     New York, NY 10022
     Phone: +1 (212) 561-4187
     Email: dmacgreevey@alixpartners.com

                          About Fusion

Fusion Connect -- http://www.fusionconnect.com/-- provides
integrated cloud solutions to small, medium and large businesses,
is the industry's Single Source for the Cloud.  Fusion's advanced,
proprietary cloud services platform enables the integration of
leading edge solutions in the cloud, including cloud
communications, contact center, cloud connectivity, and cloud
computing.  Fusion's innovative, yet proven cloud solutions lower
customers' cost of ownership, and deliver new levels of security,
flexibility, scalability, and speed of deployment.

On June 3, 2019, Fusion Connect and each of its U.S. subsidiaries
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
19-11811).  Fusion's two Canadian subsidiaries are not included in
the filing.

Fusion disclosed $570,432,338 in assets and $760,720,713 in
liabilities as of April 30, 2019.

Fusion is advised by FTI Consulting and PJT Partners, Inc., as
financial advisors, and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as legal
counsel.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

The First Lien Ad Hoc Group is advised by Greenhill & Co, LLC, as
financial advisor, and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as legal
counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 formed a committee of unsecured
creditors in the Debtors' cases on June 18, 2019.  The committee is
represented by Cooley LLP.


FUSION CONNECT: Committee Taps Cooley as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Fusion Connect,
Inc. received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York to hire Cooley LLP as its legal
counsel.

The firm will provide these services to the committee in connection
with the Chapter 11 cases filed by the company and its
subsidiaries:

     (a) attend the meetings of the committee;

     (b) review financial and operational information furnished by
the Debtors to the committee;

     (c) analyze and negotiate the budget and the terms of the
Debtors' use of cash collateral and debtor-in-possession financing;


     (d) assist in the Debtors' efforts to sell their assets in a
manner that maximizes value for creditors;

     (e) review and investigate the Debtors' pre-bankruptcy
conduct, including pre-bankruptcy transfers and transactions in
which the Debtors and their insiders were involved;

     (f) assist the committee in negotiations with the Debtors and
other parties in interest on any proposed Chapter 11 plan or exit
strategy;

     (g) confer with the Debtors' management, counsel, investment
banker, financial advisors and other retained professionals
regarding the Debtors' bankruptcy cases;

     (h) confer with the principals, counsel and advisors of the
Debtors' secured lenders and equity holders regarding the Debtors'
bankruptcy cases;

     (i) review the Debtors' schedules, statements of financial
affairs and business plan;

     (j) advise the committee as to the ramifications regarding all
of the Debtors' activities and motions before the bankruptcy court;


     (k) review and analyze the Debtors' financial advisors' work
product and report to the committee;

     (l) provide the committee with legal advice in relation to the
Debtors' cases; and

     (m) prepare and file various pleadings on behalf of the
committee.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Cathy Hershcopf     Partner         $1,185
     Jonathan Kim        Partner         $1,005
     Seth Van Aalten     Partner           $995
     Robert Winning      Special Counsel   $955
     Michael Berkovits   Associate         $955
     Sarah Carnes        Associate         $825
     Daniel Pohlman      Associate         $755
     Paul Springer       Associate         $670
     Mollie Canby        Paralegal         $275

Cathy Hershcopf, Esq., a partner at Cooley, disclosed in court
filings that the firm is "disinterested" within the meaning of
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases, Ms.
Hershcopf disclosed that the firm has not agreed to a variation of
its standard or customary billing arrangements for its employment
with the Debtor, and that no professional at the firm has varied
his rate based on the geographic location of the Debtors'
bankruptcy cases.

The attorney also disclosed that Cooley has not represented the
committee or any of its members in the 12 months prior to the
Debtors' bankruptcy filing.  

Ms. Hershcopf also disclosed that the firm's prospective budget and
staffing plan for the period June 18 to Sept. 30, 2019 have already
been approved.

Cooley can be reached through:

     Cathy Hershcopf, Esq.
     Seth Van Aalten, Esq.
     Robert Winning, Esq.
     Sarah Carnes, Esq.
     Cooley LLP  
     55 Hudson Yards
     New York, NY 10001
     Telephone: (212) 479-6000
     Email: chershcopf@cooley.com
            svanaalten@cooley.com    
            rwinning@cooley.com
            scarnes@cooley.com

                          About Fusion

Fusion Connect -- http://www.fusionconnect.com/-- provides
integrated cloud solutions to small, medium and large businesses,
is the industry's Single Source for the Cloud.  Fusion's advanced,
proprietary cloud services platform enables the integration of
leading edge solutions in the cloud, including cloud
communications, contact center, cloud connectivity, and cloud
computing.  Fusion's innovative, yet proven cloud solutions lower
customers' cost of ownership, and deliver new levels of security,
flexibility, scalability, and speed of deployment.

On June 3, 2019, Fusion Connect and each of its U.S. subsidiaries
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
19-11811).  Fusion's two Canadian subsidiaries are not included in
the filing.

Fusion disclosed $570,432,338 in assets and $760,720,713 in
liabilities as of April 30, 2019.

Fusion is advised by FTI Consulting and PJT Partners, Inc., as
financial advisors, and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as legal
counsel.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

The First Lien Ad Hoc Group is advised by Greenhill & Co, LLC, as
financial advisor, and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as legal
counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 formed a committee of unsecured
creditors in the Debtors' cases on June 18, 2019.  The committee is
represented by Cooley LLP.


FUSION CONNECT: Taps EisnerAmper as Auditor
-------------------------------------------
Fusion Connect, Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York to hire EisnerAmper LLP
as its auditor.

The firm will provide these services:

     a. audit the consolidated balance sheet of Fusion Connect and
its subsidiaries as of Dec. 31, 2018, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended;  

     b. audit the consolidated financial statements of Birch
Communications Holdings, Inc., as of and for the year ended Dec.
31, 2017;

     c. review the audited consolidated financial statements of
Fusion Connect for the quarters ended March 31, 2019 and June 30,
2019, and the respective year-to-date periods;

     d. audit the Debtors' internal control over financial
reporting; and

     e. issue written reports on the Debtors' financial statements
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
to be included in the annual report.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Partners            $470 – $640
     Directors           $325 – $530
     Senior Managers     $310 – $475
     Managers            $285 – $425
     Senior/Staff        $180 – $310

During the 90-day period prior to the petition date, the Debtors
paid the firm the sum of $681,563.  

Richard Nachmias, a partner at EisnerAmper, disclosed in court
filings that the firm is "disinterested" within the meaning of
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Richard Nachmias
     EisnerAmper LLP
     750 Third Avenue
     New York, NY 10017
     Phone: 212.891.4096/212.949.8700

                          About Fusion

Fusion Connect -- http://www.fusionconnect.com/-- provides
integrated cloud solutions to small, medium and large businesses,
is the industry's Single Source for the Cloud.  Fusion's advanced,
proprietary cloud services platform enables the integration of
leading edge solutions in the cloud, including cloud
communications, contact center, cloud connectivity, and cloud
computing.  Fusion's innovative, yet proven cloud solutions lower
customers' cost of ownership, and deliver new levels of security,
flexibility, scalability, and speed of deployment.

On June 3, 2019, Fusion Connect and each of its U.S. subsidiaries
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
19-11811).  Fusion's two Canadian subsidiaries are not included in
the filing.

Fusion disclosed $570,432,338 in assets and $760,720,713 in
liabilities as of April 30, 2019.

Fusion is advised by FTI Consulting and PJT Partners, Inc., as
financial advisors, and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as legal
counsel.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

The First Lien Ad Hoc Group is advised by Greenhill & Co, LLC, as
financial advisor, and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as legal
counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 formed a committee of unsecured
creditors in the Debtors' cases on June 18, 2019.  The committee is
represented by Cooley LLP.


FUSION CONNECT: Taps Grant Thornton as Advisor
----------------------------------------------
Fusion Connect, Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York to hire Grant Thornton
LLP as its advisor.
  
The firm will provide these services in connection with the
Chapter 11 cases filed by the company and its affiliates:

A. Financial Due Diligence

     i. Grant Thornton shall perform an income statement analysis
for the previous two fiscal years and the most recent, trailing
twelve month (TTM) period ending with the TTM period most recently
closed  (collectively the "Historical Period"), in this case: 2017
and 2018, and TTM to May 31, 2019.  

    ii. Grant Thornton shall analyze balance sheet items at
December 2017, 2018 and May 31, 2019.  If the Debtors' May 2019
results and balance sheet are unavailable at the start of Grant
Thornton’s work, then the work will cover the YTD 2019 period
ended April 30, 2019 and the balance sheet at that date.  

B. Business/Transaction Overview

     i. Grant Thornton shall read the latest available interim
financial statements as well as the audited financial statements
and audit work papers for the fiscal year ended FY17 and FY18
(should one become available prior to the completion of Grant
Thornton's assignment), related to the Debtors and discuss key
reports used to manage the business and include key performance
indicators, recurring revenues, churn, customers, etc.

    ii. Grant Thornton shall inquire regarding the consistency of
interim financial reporting (both monthly and quarterly) and
procedures compared to those at year-end.

C. Quality of Earnings

     i. Grant Thornton shall present a reconciliation of net income
to EBITDA for each annual period of the "historical period."

    ii. Grant Thornton shall evaluate all EBITDA adjustments
identified by management for the historical period.

   iii. Grant Thornton shall identify diligence adjustment, such as
corrections or refinements to management adjustments; non-recurring
items (including integration costs, restructuring costs, and
results from discontinued operations); non-operating items
(including financing costs and gains/losses on debt
extinguishment); and accounting corrections and inconsistencies.

    iv. Grant Thornton shall get supporting documentation for all
adjustments and discuss with management.  

     v. Grant Thornton shall contemplate the existence of pro forma
matters that should be included in the quality of earnings analysis
that may impact sustainability of the Debtors' earnings:

        a) Pre-acquisition trading results of Birch and Megapath.
To the extent identified by management, the pre-acquisition trading
results should also be adjusted for quality of earnings
adjustments;

        b) Results generated by the Canadian business segment, to
the extent this is separately identifiable.

    vi. Grant Thornton shall evaluate pro forma impact of cost
savings already implemented.

   vii. Grant Thornton shall assess the validity of
management-proposed adjustments, including assessment of any EBITDA
impacts.

  viii. The firm shall present its findings in a quality of
earnings analysis that bridges reported EBITDA to
management-adjusted EBITDA to diligence-adjusted EBITDA and then to
pro-forma EBITDA.  

D. Quality of revenue

     i. Grant Thornton shall understand pipeline, bookings,
billings, collection and revenue recognition, including:

     a) Understand the revenue recognition policy for each element
of revenue (recurring charges, usage charges, installation and
equipment);

     b) Discuss the customer contract renewal process and related
accounting;

     c) Obtain a listing of credit memos, if any, and inquire
regarding the nature of larger credit memos;

     d) Understand management's calculation of churn, methodology
for tracking, and reasons;

     e) Conduct analysis of revenue by customer:

       (1) Understand key customer relationships –- tenure,
contract term, competition, etc.; and

       (2) For large customers –- summarize contract term and
renewal dates.

     f) Conduct analysis of revenue components (i.e. by product,
segment, customer, cohort and type, to the extent revenue is
analyzed this way by the Company);

     g) Read significant customer contracts and standard customer
MSAs and note any identified unusual terms and conditions;

     h) Present revenue pro forma for all acquisitions; and

     i) Obtain and summarize management’s analysis of bookings
(TCV/ACV), gross installs, and MRR rollforward analysis, including
up-for-renewal and retention rate calculations (by product, by
segment, by customer) and an analysis of the gap between bookings
and installs.

E. Cost of revenue

     i. Grant Thornton shall understand the trends in major
categories of cost of revenue.

    ii. Grant Thornton shall understand gross margin by
product/service.

   iii. Grant Thornton shall obtain an understanding of significant
third party vendors/suppliers, reading contracts as appropriate and
summarizing historical spending levels with the Debtors' largest
vendors.

    iv. Gain an understanding of royalty, software licensing and
pass-through costs used in the Debtors' product offering.

F. Operating expenses

     i. Grant Thornton shall understand trends and the underlying
drivers of the major categories of operating expenses.

    ii. Grant Thornton shall obtain payroll summaries and reconcile
to salaries and wages per the income statements, including:  

        a) Analyze payroll expenses by type (to include salaries,
bonus, commission and other significant benefits);

        b) Obtain a listing of outsourced services (e.g.
professional and consulting) and discuss with management the nature
of the expense and relationship;

        c) Obtain an analysis of R&D costs by project or product
including whether internal or external, and consider
appropriateness of accounting treatment (expense vs. capitalized);
and
       
        d) Summarize the cash and GAAP impact of deferred
commissions and other capitalized costs.

G. Balance sheet

     i. Grant Thornton shall analyze the balance sheet components.


    ii. Accounts receivable. Grant Thornton shall consider AR by
customer, aging, bad debt experience, collectability, reserves.

   iii. Prepaid expenses and other assets. Grant Thornton shall
understand components and realizability.

    iv. Property and equipment. Grant Thornton shall roll forward
equipment, evaluating the nature of capex (growth and maintenance)
and the leases involved in the operations of the business.

     v. Inventory –- accounting, aging, physicals, reserves.

    vi. Accounts payable. Grant Thornton shall consider AP by
vendor and aging.

   vii. Deferred revenue. Grant Thornton shall understand
associated accounting, nature, roll-off, long term vs short term.

  viii. Accrued expenses. Grant Thornton shall understand
components, roll forward of activity, interim vs. year-end,
evaluate subjective balances.

    ix. Grant Thornton shall conduct analysis of cash management
policies and procedures, AR policies and procedures, historical
capital expenditure requirements and capitalization policies,
prepaid expenses and other current assets for appropriate deferral
of period costs, and different components of deferred revenue.

     x. Grant Thornton shall present the independent balance sheet
for the Canadian subsidiary as at the latest available balance
sheet date (to the extent the Debtors can separately identify and
report the balance sheet for this entity).

     xi. Grant Thornton shall conduct analysis of USF and other
telecom and sales tax liabilities that may have not been properly
accrued.

H. Working capital/debt and debt-like items

     i. Grant Thornton shall analyze monthly working capital
requirements for the trailing 12 months, identify trends and
normalizing adjustments.

    ii. Grant Thornton shall prepare a summary of adjustments for
the trailing 12 month period based on the results of the procedures
performed.

   iii. Grant Thornton shall understand billings seasonality and
average time to collect.

I. Commitments and contingencies

     i. Grant Thornton shall inquire about commitments and
contingencies, including leases, purchase commitments,
self-insurance, post-retirement benefits, incentive compensation,
pending or threatened litigation or investigations by regulatory or
other authorities.

    ii. Grant Thornton shall conduct analysis of any off-balance
sheet liabilities, commitments and contingencies.

Based on the scope of the services, the fees are estimated to be
between $190,000 and $210,000.

If additional services are required as the engagement progresses,
the work will be undertaken based on the Debtors' instructions and
invoiced based on the hourly rates.  The hourly rates for
accounting and financial reporting advisory services and tax
advisory services to be rendered by the firm are:  

     Partner/Managing Director     $870
     Senior Manager/Director       $710
     Manager                       $590
     Senior Associate              $450
     Associate                     $320

Bryan Walker, managing director of Grant Thornton, disclosed in
court filings that the firm is "disinterested" within the meaning
of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Bryan L. Walker
     Grant Thornton LLP
     757 Third Avenue, 9th Floor
     New York, NY 10017
     Tel: +1 415 318 2235
     Email: bryan.walker@us.gt.com

                          About Fusion

Fusion Connect -- http://www.fusionconnect.com/-- provides
integrated cloud solutions to small, medium and large businesses,
is the industry's Single Source for the Cloud.  Fusion's advanced,
proprietary cloud services platform enables the integration of
leading edge solutions in the cloud, including cloud
communications, contact center, cloud connectivity, and cloud
computing.  Fusion's innovative, yet proven cloud solutions lower
customers' cost of ownership, and deliver new levels of security,
flexibility, scalability, and speed of deployment.

On June 3, 2019, Fusion Connect and each of its U.S. subsidiaries
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
19-11811).  Fusion's two Canadian subsidiaries are not included in
the filing.

Fusion disclosed $570,432,338 in assets and $760,720,713 in
liabilities as of April 30, 2019.

Fusion is advised by FTI Consulting and PJT Partners, Inc., as
financial advisors, and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as legal
counsel.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

The First Lien Ad Hoc Group is advised by Greenhill & Co, LLC, as
financial advisor, and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as legal
counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 formed a committee of unsecured
creditors in the Debtors' cases on June 18, 2019.  The committee is
represented by Cooley LLP.


FUSION CONNECT: Taps KPMG LLP as Tax Consultant
-----------------------------------------------
Fusion Connect, Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York to hire KPMG LLP as its
tax consultant.

The firm will provide transaction tax and business license
compliance services, which include the preparation of state and
local transaction tax returns and supporting schedules for the
reporting periods August 2018 to July 2020.

KPMG will also assist the Debtors in Canadian sales tax reporting
matters.  These services include a preliminary review and analysis
of the proposed audit assessment, data and supporting documentation
provided to the Canadian Revenue Agency to determine whether the
proposed assessment is accurate and validate any auditor
extrapolations used in the assessment.

The firm will be compensated for its services as follows:

Transaction Tax Compliance:

   * Base Monthly Fee for the preparation of up to 1,100 sales and
use tax returns per month

     Rate: $15,400
     Frequency: Per Month

   * If required data is received late, a late data processing
charge will be imposed

     Rate: 20 percent of current month's return fees
     Frequency: Per Instance

   * Additional Returns. The cost of each additional return
exceeding the estimated monthly average will be added to the base
monthly fee

     Rate: $10
     Frequency: Per Return

Business License Compliance Services:

   * Per Business License Renewal

     Rate: $150
     Frequency: Per Renewal

   * Additional Service: Initial Business License Applications

     Rate: $350
     Frequency: Per application request

   * Canadian Sales Tax Reporting Matters

     Rate: $4,500 - $5,500
     Frequency: Per Month

For tax consulting and "out-of-scope" services, the hourly rates
are:

     Partners/Managing Directors     $787.50
     Senior Managers                 $700.00
     Managers                        $542.50
     Senior Associates               $402.50
     Associates                      $297.50  

Kimberley Wick, a principal of KPMG, disclosed in court filings
that the firm is "disinterested" within the meaning of Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

KPMG can be reached through:

     Kimberley A. Wick
     KPMG LLP
     3625 Cumberland Blvd, Suite 1400
     Atlanta, GA 30339

                          About Fusion

Fusion Connect -- http://www.fusionconnect.com/-- provides
integrated cloud solutions to small, medium and large businesses,
is the industry's Single Source for the Cloud.  Fusion's advanced,
proprietary cloud services platform enables the integration of
leading edge solutions in the cloud, including cloud
communications, contact center, cloud connectivity, and cloud
computing.  Fusion's innovative, yet proven cloud solutions lower
customers' cost of ownership, and deliver new levels of security,
flexibility, scalability, and speed of deployment.

On June 3, 2019, Fusion Connect and each of its U.S. subsidiaries
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
19-11811).  Fusion's two Canadian subsidiaries are not included in
the filing.

Fusion disclosed $570,432,338 in assets and $760,720,713 in
liabilities as of April 30, 2019.

Fusion is advised by FTI Consulting and PJT Partners, Inc., as
financial advisors, and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as legal
counsel.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

The First Lien Ad Hoc Group is advised by Greenhill & Co, LLC, as
financial advisor, and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as legal
counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 formed a committee of unsecured
creditors in the Debtors' cases on June 18, 2019.  The committee is
represented by Cooley LLP.


FUSION CONNECT: Taps PwC as Tax Consultant
------------------------------------------
Fusion Connect, Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York to hire
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as its tax consultant.

PwC will provide income and franchise tax-related services, and
other tax consulting services to the company and its subsidiaries.
The hourly rates for these services are:

     Individuals          Hourly Rates
     -----------          ------------
     Partner                $798 - $1,148
     Director               $560 - $936
     Manager                $470 - $668
     Senior Associate       $380 - $662
     Associate              $295 - $398

The firm will also provide professionals to the Debtors to assist
with certain matters related to the preparation of financial
statement tax accrual, tax compliance services, and the preparation
or aggregation of tax-related information for the Debtors' tax
department use.  The hourly rates for these services are:

     Individuals       Hourly Rates
     -----------       ------------  
     Partner               n/a
     Director              n/a
     Manager              $290
     Senior Associate     $210
     Associate            $140

For tax compliance services such as the preparation of the Debtors'
federal and state income tax returns for 2018, PwC will receive a
fixed fee of $170,000.  

Meanwhile, the firm will be paid a fixed fee of $100,000 for
so-called transaction costs services, which include an analysis of
the external transaction costs for advisors incurred by the Debtors
and Birch Communications Holdings, Inc. in connection with the
acquisition of Birch, and the documentation of the federal income
tax treatment of the costs incurred.

During the 90 days immediately preceding the petition date, the
Debtors paid PwC $586,541 for its pre-bankruptcy services.  Of this
amount, $225,000 serves as a retainer while the remainder
constitutes advance payments.

Sarah Anderson, a partner at PwC, disclosed in court filings that
the firm is "disinterested" within the meaning of Section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code. /does not hold any interest adverse to the
Debtor and its bankruptcy estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Sarah Anderson
     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
     1075 Peachtree Street, Suite 2600
     Atlanta, GA 30309
     Telephone: [1] (678) 419 1000
     Telecopier: [1] (678) 419 1239

                          About Fusion

Fusion Connect -- http://www.fusionconnect.com/-- provides
integrated cloud solutions to small, medium and large businesses,
is the industry's Single Source for the Cloud.  Fusion's advanced,
proprietary cloud services platform enables the integration of
leading edge solutions in the cloud, including cloud
communications, contact center, cloud connectivity, and cloud
computing.  Fusion's innovative, yet proven cloud solutions lower
customers' cost of ownership, and deliver new levels of security,
flexibility, scalability, and speed of deployment.

On June 3, 2019, Fusion Connect and each of its U.S. subsidiaries
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
19-11811).  Fusion's two Canadian subsidiaries are not included in
the filing.

Fusion disclosed $570,432,338 in assets and $760,720,713 in
liabilities as of April 30, 2019.

Fusion is advised by FTI Consulting and PJT Partners, Inc., as
financial advisors, and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as legal
counsel.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

The First Lien Ad Hoc Group is advised by Greenhill & Co, LLC, as
financial advisor, and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as legal
counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 formed a committee of unsecured
creditors in the Debtors' cases on June 18, 2019.  The committee is
represented by Cooley LLP.


FYRE FESTIVAL: Models, Musicians Face Suits Over Festival Payments
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Randles, writing for The Wall Street Journal, reported
that Gregory Messer, the trustee in Fyre Festival LLC's bankruptcy
case, sued models who promoted the Fyre Festival on social media
and musicians who were booked to perform at the doomed music
festival to attempt to recover payments they received from William
"Billy" McFarland or companies he used to organize the event.

According to the report, Models Kendall Jenner and Emily
Ratajkowski and performers Migos, Pusha T and Lil Yachty are among
the big names sued in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York by the
Trustee who has been investigating who got paid in the lead-up to
the 2017 event that was supposed to take place over two weekends on
an island in the Bahamas.

The Journal related that lawsuits seek to recover money paid to
talent agencies, performers they represent and some vendors,
including two companies that were paid to charter musicians to the
festival on private jets and yachts.

The Journal said Ms. Jenner was allegedly paid $250,000 to promote
Fyre Festival months before the event through a since-deleted
Instagram post.  She was paid another $25,000 days after making the
post, the trustee alleges in one of the lawsuits, the Journal
further related.

Mr. McFarland and his company, Fyre Media Inc., were also sued over
$14 million allegedly transferred either to him, directly, or to
Fyre Media from its bankrupt subsidiary formed to promote the
festival, the report said.

The lawsuit, according to the Journal, said Fyre Media paid:

   -- $299,000 to DNA Model Management LLC, which represented Ms.
Ratajkowski

   -- $350,000 to International Creative Management LLC for
performances from Lil Yachty, Migos and Rae Sremmurd

   -- $730,000 to Nue Agency LLC for performances by Pusha T and
fellow rappers Desiigner and Tyga

   -- $500,000 to Creative Artists Agency to book Blink-182

Creditors John Nemeth, Raul Jimenez, and Andrew Newman filed an
involuntary Chapter 7 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-11883)
against Fyre Festival LLC on July 7, 2017.

The Petitioning Creditors are represented by Robert Knuts, Esq., at
Sher Tremonte LLP.

Gregory Messer, Esq., was appointed as Chapter 7 trustee, and is
represented by Fred Stevens, Esq., Christopher J. Reilly, Esq., and
Jacqulyn S. Loftin, Esq., at Klestadt Winters Jureller Southard &
Stevens, LLP.


GB SCIENCES: Delays Filing of Second Quarter Form 10-Q
------------------------------------------------------
GB Sciences, Inc. was unable to file its quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2019, by the prescribed
date of Aug. 14, 2019, without unreasonable effort or expense,
because the Company needed additional time to complete certain
disclosures and analyses to be included in the Report.  In
accordance with Rule 12b-25 promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company intends to file the
Report on or prior to the fifth calendar day following the
prescribed due date.

                            About GB Sciences

Las Vegas, Nevada-based GB Sciences, Inc., formerly Growblox
Sciences, Inc., is developing and utilizing state of the art
technologies in plant biology, cultivation and extraction
techniques, combined with biotechnology, and plans to produce
consistent and measurable medical-grade cannabis, cannabis
concentrates and cannabinoid therapies.  The Company seeks to be an
innovative technology and solution company that converts the
cannabis plant into medicines, therapies and treatments for a
variety of ailments.

GB Sciences incurred net loss of $24.68 million for the 12 months
ended March 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $23.15 million for
the 12 months ended March 31, 2018.  As of June 30, 2019, the
Company had $30.46 million in total assets, $14.85 million in total
liabilities, and $15.61 million in total equity.

Soles, Heyn & Company, LLP, in West Palm Beach, Florida, the
Company's auditor since the year ended March 31, 2014, issued a
"going concern" qualification in its report dated July 15, 2019, on
the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended
March 31, 2019, citing that the Company had accumulated losses of
approximately $84.7 million, has generated limited revenue, and may
experience losses in the near term.  These factors and the need for
additional financing in order for the Company to meet its business
plan, raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.


GLOBAL EAGLE: Incurs $38.5 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------------
Global Eagle Entertainment Inc. filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting a
net loss of $38.46 million on $157.46 million of total revenue for
the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to a net loss of
$45.91 million on $165.96 million of total revenue for the three
months ended June 30, 2018.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company reported a net
loss of $76.06 million on $324.08 million of total revenue compared
to a net loss of $84.19 million on $322.45 million of total revenue
for the same period last year.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $702.9 million in total
assets, $1 billion in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $300.5 million.

"We are delivering technical innovation to our Connectivity and
Media & Content customers while driving improving efficiency
throughout our cost structure," commented Josh Marks, CEO of Global
Eagle.  "Executing for both our customers and stakeholders is
leading to a substantial improvement in cash generation that we
expect to build upon, consistent with our goal of sustainable
positive free cash flow by year-end."

The Company generated record cash flows from operating activities
of approximately $12 million in the second quarter primarily due to
favorable working capital dynamics.  Capital expenditures during
the quarter were approximately $4 million, down more than 50%
versus the first quarter of 2019.  The Company generated positive
free cash flow of approximately $8 million in the second quarter of
2019.  

"We are driving cultural change and process improvements to ensure
we have the most efficient cost structure in our industry. This
will take time, but our improved results provide positive
reinforcement," said Christian Mezger, CFO of Global Eagle.  "The
positive free cash we generated this quarter benefited from
favorable working capital dynamics.  Nonetheless, we believe this
quarter is a significant milestone to achieve sustainable positive
free cash flow by year end."

               Operational and Strategic Initiatives

In mid-July, the Company announced that it completed a $40 million
upsizing of its Senior Secured Term Loan due 2023, as well as an
amendment to its Term Loan which, among other things, reduced
scheduled principal repayments over the next six quarters by an
aggregate amount of approximately $26 million.  Net of fees and
expenses, the Amendment will result in approximately $61 million of
incremental liquidity over the next 18 months.  This supplements
the Company's approximately $49 million of liquidity as of June 30,
2019, which includes cash and unused revolver capacity, and further
enables the Company to focus on executing its growth initiatives.

The Company continues to work with its financial advisor, Barclays
Capital Inc., to evaluate offers for all or a portion of the
non-aviation components of our Connectivity business.  The Company
now expects the evaluation process to conclude by the end of fall.
Separately, the Company continues to evaluate the potential sale of
certain joint venture interests.

                       CAO Appointment

Global Eagle also announced that Jason R. Everett has been
appointed vice president and chief accounting officer, effective on
Aug. 12, 2019.  Mr. Everett brings significant leadership
experience to Global Eagle in the areas of financial planning,
accounting, budgeting, controllership, treasury and corporate
finance, primarily from his experience most recently as vice
president, corporate controller and treasurer at Webroot Inc.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                       https://is.gd/LL0rKM

                       About Global Eagle

Headquartered in Los Angeles, California, Global Eagle --
http://www.GlobalEagle.com/-- is a provider of media, content,
connectivity and data analytics to markets across air, sea and
land.  Global Eagle offers a fully integrated suite of rich media
content and seamless connectivity solutions to airlines, cruise
lines, commercial ships, high-end yachts, ferries and land
locations worldwide.  The Company has approximately 1,200 employees
and 50 offices on six continents.

Global Eagle incurred a net loss of $236.6 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $357.1 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of March 31, 2019, Global Eagle
had $734.9 million in total assets, $998.98 million in total
liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $264.1 million.

                            *   *   *

As reported by the TCR on July 29, 2019, S&P Global Ratings
affirmed all ratings on Global Eagle Entertainment Inc., including
its issuer credit rating of 'CCC', and revised the outlook to
developing to reflect greater flexibility to allow management to
execute on its growth initiatives.  The outlook change reflects a
significantly improved liquidity profile following the recent
incremental term loan and credit agreement amendment, which buys
the company more time to execute on
its growth plan.


GREEN PHARMACEUTICALS: Unsecureds to Get $54K Under Plan
--------------------------------------------------------
Green Pharmaceuticals filed a Chapter 11 plan and accompanying
disclosure statement proposing that Class 3 - General unsecured
claims, which are impaired, will get a total payout of $54,000.

From months 7 to 60, Class 3 will get $1,000 per month, or 1.50% of
claims Debtor scheduled or 1.38% of reconciled claims (scheduled
amounts as modified by amounts in filed claims).

Class 1 - Secured claim of FC Marketplace (lender in senior
position) are impaired. M7-M12 at $1,800/month; M13-36 at
$2,000/month and M37-60 at $2,833/month with total payout of
$125,016.36

The Plan will be funded by the Debtor's business operation.

The hearing where the Court will determine whether or not to
confirm the Plan will take place on October 15, 2019, at 11:00 a.m.
in Courtroom 201 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court located at 1415 State
Street, Santa Barbara California 93101.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement dated
August 21, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y3kyxdbl from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for the Debtor:

     Steven R. Fox, Esq.
     THE FOX LAW CORPORATION, INC.
     W. Sloan Youkstetter, SBN 296681
     17835 Ventura Blvd., Suite 306
     Encino, CA 91316
     Tel: (818)774-3545
     Fax: (818)774-3707
     Email: srfox@foxlaw.com

                   About Green Pharmaceuticals

Green Pharmaceuticals, Inc. -- https://www.snorestop.com/ -- is a
privately held company in Camarillo, California offering its
flagship brand SnoreStop, an easy-to-use sprays and tablets that
help people to experience a good night's sleep. SnoreStop the only
medically proven over-the-counter natural solution to snoring that
is not a device.

Green Pharmaceuticals, based in Camarillo, CA, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-12087) on Dec. 19, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Dominique De Rivel, president and CEO, the
Debtor disclosed $380,735 in assets and $3,951,007 in liabilities.

The Hon. Deborah J. Saltzman oversees the case.  Steven R. Fox,
Esq., at The Fox Law Corporation, Inc., serves as bankruptcy
counsel.


GREENSTREET LLC: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
-----------------------------------------------------
Greenstreet LLC filed a Chapter 11 plan of liquidation and
accompanying disclosure statement proposing for the following
classification of claims:

   Class 1: Secured Claim of Royal Capital

   Class 2: Secured Claim of Three Kids

   Class 3: Secured Claim of King County (Kent Property)

   Class 4: Secured Claim of King County (Boylston Property)

   Class 5: Secured Claim of Snohomish County (Wilson Property)

   Class 6: Unsecured Claims of Kwan Group

   Class 7: Unsecured Claims Other Than Class 6 Claims

   Class 8: Equity Interests

Net liquidation proceeds would be paid to general unsecured
creditors only to the extent funds are available after secured
creditors have been paid the full value of their collateral and
priority creditors receive full payment on their claims. Equity
holders receive distributions only if all creditors are paid in
full. The Plan provides for full payment to all creditors, and
represents a much better option for equity holders. full value of
their collateral and priority creditors receive full payment on
their claims. Equity holders receive distributions only if all
creditors are paid in full. The Plan provides for full payment to
all creditors, and represents a much better option for equity
holders.

The hearing on the Disclosure Statement is set for Sept. 20, 2019
at 09:30 AM.  Responses are due by Sept. 13.

A full-text copy of the Joint Debtors' Disclosure Statement dated
August 21, 2019, is available at  https://tinyurl.com/yxe4jarr from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Based in Seattle, Washington, Greenstreet LLC and its two
affiliates, First Hill Partners LLC and East Hill Summit LLC, filed
voluntary Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No.
19-12654) on July 17, 2019.  The cases with Case Nos. 19-12654 and
19-12656 are assigned to Hon. Christopher M. Alston.  The case with
Case No. 19-12655 is assigned to Hon. Marc Barreca.

The Debtors' counsel is Thomas A. Buford, Esq., and James L. Day,
Esq., at Bush Kornfeld LLP, in Seattle, Washington.


GUARDIAN EXTERIORS: Court Conditionally Approves Plan Disclosures
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Disclosure Statement explaining the Chapter 11 small business
plan of Guardian Exteriors, Inc., is conditionally approved.

The hearing to consider final approval of the Disclosure Statement
and to consider the confirmation of the proposed Chapter 11 Plan is
fixed and will be conducted on October 2, 2019 at 2:00 p.m., by the
Honorable Harlin D. Hale on the 14th Floor, Courtroom #3, U.S.
Courthouse, 1100 Commerce St., Dallas, Texas 75242.

September 25, 2019 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to final approval of the Disclosure Statement or
confirmation of the proposed Chapter 11 plan.  September 25, 2019
is fixed as the last day for filing written acceptances or
rejections of the proposed Chapter 11 Plan.

A Class 7 Claimant holding an Allowed Unsecured Claim shall be paid
a pro rata share of
$180,000 over 60 months from the Effective Date of the Confirmed
Plan.  The Debtor will begin making payments in monthly
installments on the Class 7 Claims thirty (30) days after the
Effective Date of the Confirmed Plan.  To the extent a claim is not
allowed until a date after the commencement of the 60 month payment
period, payments on such allowed claim will commence and be due and
payable on the first day of the month following the date of the
order allowing such claim, and the first day of each month
remaining in the 60 month payment period in an amount sufficient to
pay the allowed unsecured claim its pro rata share. The first
payment to Class 7 Claimants will be 1/60th of the claimant's pro
rata share on the Allowed Unsecured Claim. The 1/60th payment will
be computed by dividing the allowed pro rata share of the claim by
60 months to equal a monthly payment.  Payments in an equal amount
to the initial payment will continue to be made monthly until the
claim is paid its pro rata share over a maximum payment term of 60
months.

As of August 16, unsecured creditors had filed approximately
$699,640.78 in unsecured claims including a general unsecured claim
by the Internal Revenue Service in the amount of $1,365.50.  The
Debtor scheduled an additional $185,933.13 in unsecured claimants
that have not filed claims.  The Debtor estimates the total of
allowed unsecured claims to be approximately $760,000.00 after
disputed claims are resolved.  The Debtor estimates the dividend to
unsecured creditors to be approximately 23% of their allowed
unsecured claims, and the combined monthly payment to unsecured
creditors will be $3,000.00 per month.

The Class 7 claims are impaired.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y5fgo342 from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

     Attorney for Debtor:

     Areya Holder Aurzada
     HOLDER LAW
     901 Main Street, Suite 5320
     Dallas, TX 75202
     Telephone: (972) 438-8800
     Email: areya@holderlawpc.com

About Guardian Exteriors

Guardian Exteriors, Inc., a roofing contractor in Duncanville,
Texas, filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No.
19-30230) on Jan. 22, 2019. In the petition signed by Teena
Roberts, CFO, the Debtor estimated $500,000 to $1 million in
assets
and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities. The case is assigned
to Judge Harlin DeWayne Hale.  The Debtor tapped Areya Holder
Aurzada, Esq., at the Law Office of Areya Holder, P.C., as its
counsel.


HILCORP ENERGY I: Moody's Reviews Ba1 CFR for Downgrade
-------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed the ratings of Hilcorp Energy I,
L.P. under review for downgrade following the announcement that
Hilcorp Alaska, LLC and Harvest Alaska, LLC, its wholly owned
subsidiaries, have agreed to acquire BP p.l.c.'s (A1 stable) assets
in Alaska. Ratings placed under review include the Ba1 Corporate
Family Rating, Ba1-PR Probability of Default Rating, and Ba2 senior
unsecured notes ratings. Hilcorp expects the transaction to close
in 2020, pending regulatory review.

On August 27, 2019, Hilcorp announced that it will acquire BP's
entire upstream and midstream business, including BP Exploration
Inc., that owns all of BP's upstream oil and gas interests in
Alaska, and BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc.'s interest in the Trans
Alaska Pipeline System. The total purchase price is $5.6 billion,
which includes a base purchase price of $4 billion, payable through
2020 and subject to customary adjustments, and $1.6 billion of
additional earnout consideration payable after July 1, 2021.
Hilcorp, which is privately held, is in the process of reviewing
various financing options, and therefore the funding details for
the base purchase price are uncertain.

On Review for Downgrade:

Issuer: Hilcorp Energy I, L.P.

  Probability of Default Rating, Placed on Review for
  Downgrade, currently Ba1-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Placed on Review for Downgrade,
  currently Ba1

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Placed on Review
  for Downgrade, currently Ba2 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Hilcorp Energy I, L.P.

  Outlook, Changed To Rating Under Review From Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The review was prompted by Moody's expectation that the acquisition
will increase Hilcorp's absolute debt levels and leverage
significantly following the close of the transaction and by the
capital structure uncertainty created by the lack of any funding
details. A prudent mix of debt, equity infusion, and/or alternative
funding could be sufficient to maintain a Ba1 CFR as the company
currently has healthy debt leverage on production, reserves and
cash flow, along with robust interest coverage. However, if the
acquisition were to be mostly debt funded, debt levels (including
Moody's standard adjustments) could approach $6 billion from
roughly $2 billion currently.

Moody's review of Hilcorp's ratings will focus on the company's
financing plans for the acquisition, its target capital structure,
and its strategy and timing for deleveraging post-deal. The review
will also assess Hilcorp's capital spending and development
strategy to successfully execute on integration and cost
efficiencies plans; and the receipt of regulatory approvals and
satisfying any other conditions to the closing of the acquisition.

The proposed acquisition of BP's assets will more than double
Hilcorp's Alaskan production to around 125 mboe/day. The acquired
production, which is all oil, is expected to average over 70
mboe/day in 2020, while Hilcorp's total pro forma production across
its portfolio could increase above 225 mboe/day. Hilcorp has
previously employed the strategy of acquiring older, mature,
long-lived properties, including in Alaska's Cook Inlet and North
Slope regions, with a base level of production, creating value by
investing in and exploiting characteristically declining well
performance. Moody's expects it to extend this strategy to the
newly acquired BP's assets as well.

Moody's expects to conclude the review concurrent with the closing
of the acquisition, or sooner, if enough clarity emerges regarding
Hilcorp's post-acquisition capitalization and strategic plans.

Hilcorp is a private limited partnership headquartered in Houston,
Texas. The company's primary producing assets are located in
Alaska, Texas, Louisiana and the Utica Shale.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Independent
Exploration and Production Industry published in May 2017.


HY-TECH PLUMBING: Sept. 24 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------------
The hearing to consider the approval of the disclosure statement
explaining the Chapter 11 Plan of Hy-Tech Plumbing Contractors,
Inc., will be held at the United States Courthouse, Bob Case
Federal Building, 515 Rusk Ave., Courtroom #402, Houston, Texas, on
77002, at September 24, 2019 at 1:30 o’clock p.m..

September 17, 2019 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the disclosure statement.  Within seven (7)
days after entry of this order, the disclosure statement and plan
must be distributed.

Hy-Tech Plumbing Contractors, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-30787) on Feb. 11, 2019.  The Debtor
tapped Julie Mitchell Koenig, Esq., at Cooper & Scully, PC, as
counsel.


JAGUAR HEALTH: Bryan Ezralow Has 4.3% Stake as of Aug. 13
---------------------------------------------------------
Bryan Ezralow disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission that as of Aug. 13, 2019, he
beneficially owns 282,850 shares of common stock of Jaguar Health,
Inc., which constitutes 4.35 percent based upon a total of
6,503,458 shares of voting common stock issued and outstanding as
of Aug. 13, 2019 as advised by Jaguar Health.

Mr. Ezralow beneficially owns 282,850 shares of Common Stock of
which 212,138 shares are held by the Bryan Ezralow 1994 Trust u/t/d
December 22, 1994, of which Mr. Ezralow is the sole trustee; and
70,712 shares are held by EZ MM&B Holdings, LLC, where Mr. Ezralow
as the sole trustee of one of the trusts that is a manager of EZ
MM&B, and as a co-trustee and manager, respectively, of the two
trusts and limited liability company that comprise the managing
members of one of the other managers of EZ MM&B, shares voting and
dispositive power over those shares, and thus, may be deemed to
beneficially own those shares.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free
at:

                      https://is.gd/RHiQV1

                      About Jaguar Health

Jaguar Health, Inc. -- http://www.jaguar.health-- is a commercial
stage pharmaceuticals company focused on developing novel,
sustainably derived gastrointestinal products on a global basis.
Its wholly-owned subsidiary, Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., focuses on
developing and commercializing proprietary human gastrointestinal
pharmaceuticals for the global marketplace from plants used
traditionally in rainforest areas.  Jaguar Health's principal
executive offices are located in San Francisco, California.

Jaguar Health reported a net loss of $32.14 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $21.96 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.   As of June 30, 2019, the Company
had $36.06 million in total assets, $28.71 million in total
liabilities, $9 million in series A convertible preferred stock,
and a total stockholders' deficit of $1.64 million.

BDO USA, LLP, in San Francisco, California, the Company's auditor
since 2013, issued a "going concern" opinion in its report dated
April 10, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and an accumulated
deficit that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern.


JOE'S PLACE: Obtains Conditional Approval of Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Joe's Place of the Bronx NY, Inc., filed an amended Chapter 11 plan
and accompanying amended disclosure statement disclosing that it
has obtained conditional, but not final, approval of the disclosure
statement.

The Debtor also disclosed that it is not generating sufficient
income to pay its creditors in full.  The Debtor's sole shareholder
has no personal assets of any value and is unable to contribute any
property to help fund the plan.  After the Chapter 11 case was
filed, a divorce action was commenced against the Debtor's sole
shareholder, and the divorce court awarded his ex-spouse title to
the marital home.  The only asset Mr. Torres possesses are his
shares in the Debtor.  If the Plan is not approved by his
creditors, Mr. Torres will be unable to confirm the Plan and will
be forced to close the restaurant.

Class 3: General Unsecured Claims are impaired. Paid 10% of Allowed
claims over 60 months from the Effective Date in monthly payments
of $235.00.

Class 1: Secured and Priority Tax Claims of the NYSDTF are
impaired. Monthly payment of $4,500.00 a month for 72 months from
Effective Date.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
following: Debtor’s net income from the operation of its
restaurant.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 21, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/yy2mugs2 from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

           About Joe's Place of the Bronx, NY, Inc.

Joe's Place of the Bronx, NY, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.. Case No. 17-11542) on June 2, 2017.  The
Hon. Martin Glenn presides over the case.  Ortiz & Ortiz, LLP,
represents the Debtor as counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $50,000 to $100,000 in assets
and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities. The petition was
signed by Jose L. Torres, president.


KLINE CONSTRUCTION: Sept. 5 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, Acting United States Trustee for Region 3, will hold an
organizational meeting on September 5, 2019, at 11:00 a.m. in the
bankruptcy case of Kline Construction Co., Inc.

The meeting will be held at:

         United States Trustee's Office
         Mitchell H. Cohen Courthouse
         400 Cooper Street, Room 2200
         Camden, NJ 08102

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it
represents.

                        About Kline Construction

Founded in 1945, Kline Construction Co. --
http://www.klineconstruction.net-- is a utility support contractor
in New Jersey with six locations throughout the United
States.

Kline Construction filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. N.J. Case
No. 19-25757) on August 14, 2019.  The petition was signed by
Ronald Samarro, chief restructuring
officer.  Hon. Jerrold N. Poslusny Jr. presides over the case.

The Debtor disclosed $500,000 to $1 million in assets and $10
million to $50 million in liabilities.

The Debtor tapped Fox Rothschild LLP as counsel.


LARRY CARR & ASSOCIATES: Oct. 9 Plan Confirmation Hearing
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Michael G. Williamson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida conditionally approved the disclosure
statement explaining the Chapter 11 plan of  Larry Carr &
Associates, Inc.

The Court will conduct a hearing on confirmation of the Plan,
including timely filed objections to confirmation, objections to
the Disclosure Statement, motions for cramdown, applications for
compensation, and motions for allowance of administrative claims on
October 9, 2019 at 10:00.

Objections to confirmation must be filed with the Court no later
than seven (7) days before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

Class 4: Unsecured Claims are impaired. Each Holder of an Allowed
Unsecured Claim shall receive its Pro Rata Share of the Unsecured
Creditor Distribution. Such payment shall be made within 30 days of
the Effective Date.

Class 2: All Allowed Secured Claims of Fifth Third are impaired.
The Debtor shall sell the Property free and clear of all liens,
claims, and encumbrances, in accordance with the Bid Procedures
Order. The net proceeds of the Sale, after payment of Allowed
Secured Tax Claims, shall be paid to Fifth Third up to the amount
of its Allowed Secured Claim.

Class 3: All Allowed Secured Claims of William Brown are impaired.
The net proceeds of the Sale of the Property, after payment of
Allowed Secured Tax Claims, shall be paid to William Brown up to
the amount of his Allowed Secured Claim.

The Property will be transferred to the Purchaser, free and clear
of all Liens, Claims, and encumbrances. The proceeds from the Sale
will be used to pay Claims.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 21, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y2xox75v from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorneys for Debtor:

     Michael J. Hooi, Esq.
     Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A.
     Florida Bar No. 65377
     110 East Madison Street, Suite 200
     Tampa, Florida 33602
     (813) 229-0144
     mhooi@srbp.com

               About Larry Carr & Associates

Larry Carr & Associates, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-01390) on Feb. 21, 2019,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The
Debtor is represented by Michael J. Hooi, Esq., at Stichter Riedel
Blain & Postler, P.A.


LB STEEL: Court Conditionally Approves Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------------
The disclosure statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan of LB
Steel, LLC, is conditionally approved.

A final hearing on approval of the disclosure statement and the
plan on October 10, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.

Any objection to approval of the disclosure statement and/or
confirmation of the plan must be filed and served by September 27,
2019 at 5:00 p.m. CDT.

The Plan Proponents may reply to any objections no later than
October 4, 2019 at 5:00 p.m.

                        About LB Steel

LB Steel, LLC, provider of outsourced machining, fabrication,
burning, and assembly services, sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 15-35358) on Oct. 18, 2015.
Michael Goich signed the petition as president.

The Debtor has engaged Perkins Coie LLP as counsel; Nisen &
Elliott, and Crane Heyman Simon Welch & Clar, both as special
counsel; Livingstone Partners LLC as investment banker; and Garden
City Group LLC as notice, claims and balloting agent.

Judge Janet S. Baer is assigned to the case.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed five creditors to serve on
the official committee of unsecured creditors. The creditors are
Janco Steel LTD, Welding Industrial Supply Co., SSAB Americas, The
Walsh Group and EVRAZ North America.

The unsecured creditors' committee has engaged Duane Morris LLP as
counsel, and Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP as special
counsel.


LIBERTYVILLE IMAGING: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Libertyville Imaging Associates, Inc.
        333 Peterson Road, Suite 230
        Libertyville, IL 60048

Business Description: Libertyville Imaging Associates, Inc. --
                      http://libertyvilleimaging.com-- owns and
                      operates a medical diagnostic imaging center
                      in Libertyville, Illinois.  The Center
                      offers arthogram, bone densitometry-DEXA
                      scan, CT scan, diagnostic imaging-xray, MRI,

                      and ultrasound procedures.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 28, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Illinois (Eastern Division)

Case No.: 19-24323

Judge: Hon. Benjamin A. Goldgar

Debtor's Counsel: Chester H. Foster, Jr., Esq.
                  FOSTER LEGAL SERVICES, PLLC
                  16311 Byron Drive
                  Orland Park, IL 60462
                  Tel: 708 403-3800
                  Fax: 708 403-4095
                  E-mail: chf@fosterlegalservices.com

Total Assets: $1,223,892

Total Liabilities: $5,573,906

The petition was signed by Shoukath Ahmed, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb19-24323.pdf


LITCHFIELD LASER: Court to Confirm Modified 2nd Amended Plan
------------------------------------------------------------
The Bankruptcy Court held the hearing to consider confirmation of
the Modified Second Amended Chapter 11 Plan filed by Litchfield
Laser Skin Care.  Judge Julie A. Manning will enter an order
confirming the plan for the reasons stated on the record.

Class C (Secured Claim of Newtown Savings Bank): Newtown SB shall
receive the value of its secured claim ($15,000.00) over the course
of the Plan, and shall retain the lien on its collateral for the
full amount of its secured claim. This class shall be paid in full,
by means of monthly installment payments beginning on the Effective
Date within 60 months from the Effective Date. This class shall
also receive interest at the rate of 2.67% per annum.  Such
payments will begin on October 1, 2019. Accordingly, the Debtor
will make payments to this class in the amount of $ 267.34 per
month, from October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2024. The Debtor
may elect to pay off this class in full at any time after the
Effective Date, with a corresponding abatement of interest. The
balance of Newtown SB’s claim totaling $10,145.32 shall be
treated as a general unsecured claim (Class H).

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 19, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/yylje9fm from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

A red-lined version of the Disclosure Statement dated August 19,
2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yylje9fm from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorney for Debtor:

     Edward P. Jurkiewicz, Esq
     Lawrence & Jurkiewicz, LLC
     60 East Main Street, Suite 2
     Avon, CT 06001
     Tel: (860) 299-6263
     Fax: (860) 677-5005
     Email: edwardjurkiewicz@sbcglobal.net

              About Litchfield Laser Skin Care

Litchfield Laser Skin Care, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 18-50661) on May
25, 2018.  In the petition signed by Dr. Elizabeth Galan, owner,
the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of
$1 million.


LNB-015-13 LLC: Court Denies Approval of Disclosure Statement
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert A. Mark of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida denied, without prejudice, approval of the
amended disclosure statement explaining the amended Chapter 11 plan
of LNB-015-13, LLC, and directed the parties in the bankruptcy case
to complete their mediation.

The Ore Tenus motion of U.S. Trustee to convert or dismiss this
case is denied, but the Debtor is directed to file all delinquent
monthly operating reports and pay all U.S. Trustee fees
immediately.

The U.S. Trustee also objected to the approval of the Amended
Disclosure Statement and confirmation of the Amended Plan,
complaining that the Debtor has not filed its operating reports
since March, 2018 and is now 15 months delinquent in fling its
reports.  The U.S. Trustee asserted that the Debtor is unable to
meet its obligations proceed to confirmation, the Court should
consider dismissal or conversion of the case pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
section 1112.

                  About LNB-015-13 LLC

LNB-015-13, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-19226) on July 22,
2017.  The petition was signed by Harel Bitton, its authorized
representative.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Joel M. Aresty P.A.
is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  An official committee of
unsecured creditors has not yet been appointed in the Chapter 11
case.


MAGNUM CONSTRUCTION: U.S. Trustee Object to Disclosures
-------------------------------------------------------
Nancy J. Gargula, United States Trustee for Region 21, objects to
the First Amended Disclosure Statement and the Second Amended
Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization proposed by Magnum Construction
Management, LLC f/k/a Munilla Construction Management, LLC.

The U.S. Trustee points out that the Debtor sets forth arguments
and case law purportedly contradicting its position that the
initial funding of the Bridge Collapse Bodily Injury Claims Trust
and Other Damage Claim Fund, as well as payments made from the
Trust Accounts are disbursements for the purposes of calculating
statutory fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1930.

The U.S. Trustee further preserves all rights to object to the
Debtor's attempt to obtain an adjudication at confirmation of
whether the distributions referenced above constitute
"disbursements."  According to the U.S. Trustee, a disclosure
statement should not be approved if it describes an unconfirmable
plan.

The Debtor filed a corrected Exhibit D to the Plan -- Notice of (A)
Deadline for Casting Votes to Accept or Reject Plan of
Reorganization, (B) Hearing to Consider Confirmation of Plan of
Reorganization and (C) Related Matters, a full-text copy of which
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y3ry69pu from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

             About Magnum Construction Management

Magnum Construction Management, LLC -- https://www.mcm-us.com/ --
is a construction company specializing in heavy civil construction
in the areas of transportation, airport infrastructure, roads,
bridges, government buildings and schools.  It is headquartered in
South Miami, Florida, but also has offices in (i) Broward County,
Florida, and (ii) Irving, Texas.  As of the Petition Date, MCM
employs a total of 292 people.

Magnum Construction Management filed a voluntary petition under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr S.D. Fla. Case No.
19-12821) on March 1, 2019.  In the petition signed by CFO Gilberto
Ruizcalderon, the Debtor estimated $50 million to $100 million in
assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities. The Debtor is
represented by Paul A. Avron, Esq., at Berger Singerman LLP.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 on March 14, 2019, appointed three
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case of Magnum Construction Management, LLC. The
Committee tapped Wargo & French, LLP as its legal counsel.


MAXCOM USA: Sept. 17 Plan Confirmation, Disclosures OK Hearing
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Confirmation Hearing, at which time the Court will consider,
among other things, the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement and
confirmation of the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Maxcom USA
Telecom, Inc., and Maxcom Telecomunicaciones, S.A.B. de C.V., will
commence at 2:00 p.m. (prevailing Eastern Time) on September 17,
2019.  Objections to confirmation of the Plan, if any, must be
filed so as to be received no later than September 6, 2019 at 4:00
p.m. (prevailing Eastern Time).

Class C Class C consists of all General Unsecured Claims are
unimpaired. Holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims shall receive Cash
in an amount equal to such Allowed General Unsecured Claims on the
later of the Effective Date or in the ordinary course of business
of the Debtors in accordance with the terms of the particular
transaction giving rise to such Allowed General Unsecured Claim.

Class A Class A consists of the Old Notes Claims are impaired. Each
Holder of an Allowed Old Notes Claim shall receive its Pro Rata
share of (i) Senior Notes, (ii) Junior PIK Notes, (iii) the Cash
Payment and (iv) Cash in an amount equal to the amount of interest
accrued on the Old Notes up to the Effective Date.

All Cash consideration necessary for the Reorganized Debtors to
make payments or distributions pursuant to this Plan shall be
obtained from Cash of the Reorganized Debtors.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 19, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y47nvrre from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                     About Maxcom USA Telecom

Maxcom Telecomunicaciones, S.A.B. DE C.V is a limited liability
public stock corporation (sociedad anonima burstatil de capital
variable) with indefinite life, organized under the laws of Mexico
in 1996.  Maxcom USA is a wholly owned subsidiary of Maxcom Parent
organized under the laws of New York in 2019.  The Debtors are an
integrated telecommunication services operator providing voice and
data services to residential and small- and medium-sized business
customers in markets that the Debtors believed were underserved by
Telefonos de Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V., the local telecommunication
incumbent, and other competing telecommunications providers.

Maxcom USA Telecom, Inc., and Maxcom Telecomunicaciones, S.A.B. de
C.V., filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead
Case No. 19-23489) on August 19, 2019.  The case is assigned to
Hon. Robert D. Drain.

The Debtors' counsel is Pedro A. Jimenez, Esq., and Irena
Goldstein, Esq., at Paul Hastings LLP, in New York.  The Debtors'
financial advisor is Alvarez & Marsal Mexico.

Prime Clerk LLC serves as the Debtors' noticing, balloting and
claims administration agent, and maintains the website
https://cases.primeclerk.com/maxcom/

At the time of filing, Maxcom USA's estimated assets was $100,000
to $500,000 and liabilities was $0 to $50,000.  Maxcom
Telecomunicaciones' estimated assets and liabilities was $100
million to $500 million.


MEG ENERGY: Fitch Affirms B LT IDR & Alters Outlook to Positive
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed MEG Energy Corp.'s Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating at 'B'. Fitch has also affirmed the senior secured
second lien notes at 'BB'/'RR1' and upgraded the senior unsecured
notes to 'B+'/'RR3' from 'B'/'RR4'. Fitch has withdrawn the rating
on the revolver credit facility for commercial reasons. The Rating
Outlook has been revised to Positive from Stable.

MEG's ratings reflects improving credit metrics, below average
refinancing risk (no major bond maturities until January 2023 and
revolver extended to 2024), good liquidity, the expectation that
the company will generate positive free cash flow over the
forecasted period, higher production capacity, improved
transportation logistics that should lead to higher realized
prices, and low cost structure. This is offset by significant
exposure to wide and volatile West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and
Western Canadian Select (WCS) spreads, lack of diversification, and
increasing regulatory exposure as seen by the curtailment program
initiated by the Alberta government.

The Positive Outlook reflects Fitch's view that future free cash
flow will be used primarily to reduce debt and lead to credit
metrics more in line with a high single-'B' rating. In addition,
MEG's improving transportation logistics for its production, low
cost structure, and lower capital expenditure spending provides a
level of confidence that the company can generate positive free
cash flow despite volatile WTI/WCS spreads.

Fitch has withdrawn the rating on the RCF for commercial purposes.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Focus on Debt Reduction: MEG is prioritizing its stated strategy of
using free cash flow to repay debt. During 2Q19, the company repaid
the remaining balance of its first lien term loan of approximately
CAD285 million with proceeds from free cash flow generated during
1H19. Management has stated that its expectation for year-end is to
get net leverage to the 3x level, and Fitch expects its net
leverage to be in the 3x-3.5x range over its forecasted period.
Improvements in debt reduction will be a function of the
fluctuating WCS discounts, WTI prices, the Alberta production
quotas, and transportation issues.

FCF Improvement: Historically, MEG has generated large free cash
flow deficits to fund its growth objectives while also being
subjected to material discounts to WCS pricing. As the bulk of its
growth initiatives have been completed and the company has grown
production capacity to 100,000 bbl/d, the increase in production
combined with lower capex should lead to free cash flow generation.
According to Fitch calculations, free cash flow is expected to grow
from CAD(342) million in 2018 to CAD394 million in 2019 from a
combination of stronger results driven by higher production and
narrowing differentials and significantly lower capex. Fitch
expects FCF will decline and moderate during its forecast period
based on more normalized differentials, slightly lower oil price
assumptions, and increasing capex.

Curtailments Not Detrimental: The oil production quota the province
of Alberta put into effect in January 2019 has provided substantial
cash flow benefits to WCS-exposed producers such as MEG. While the
quota hits top-line growth, the cash flow benefit of higher WCS
prices has outweighed the volume reductions for MEG. In addition,
MEG has purchased curtailment credits that have allowed the company
to produce at higher levels than allowed under the mandated
production curtailment. Alberta has since brought the industry
quota down from 325,000 bpd to 150,000 bpd and is expected to end
the quota once oil storage levels in Western Canada reach
normalized levels, although the government did extend the
curtailments into 2020. While the curtailments have stabilized
prices, they have created some uncertainty for upstream producers.
This includes questions on the level of storage required to achieve
normal pricing, the timing of the curtailments in relation to the
opening of the Enbridge's Line 3 Pipeline, and how the newly
elected Kenney government in Alberta could, despite the recent
extension, alter the quota program or change the crude by rail
lease program put in place by the prior administration.

Growing Exposure to USGC: Fitch anticipates MEG will sell an
increasing portion of its production into the more valuable U.S.
Gulf Coast and move away from the Western Canada market. MEG sold
30% of its 2017 and 27% of its 2018 production into the Gulf Coast,
and Fitch is estimating that number will increase to 32% in 2019.
MEG currently has a 50,000 bbl/d of committed capacity on the
Flanagan South/Seaway pipeline and delivered rail capacity that
transports crude the Gulf Coast. That commitment will grow to
100,000 bbl/d in 2H20 (assuming 30% apportionment), and the
commitment is not contingent on the Enbridge Line 3 replacement
project being placed into service or Enbridge's current contract
discussions. Assuming the Enbridge 3 replacement line is completed
in late-2020, Fitch estimates transportation to the U.S. Gulf Coast
could increase from the low-30% of production to over 50%,
primarily through pipeline, which should allow for a higher
realized price for MEG's products. The USGC market has an
approximate $3.50 per barrel premium to the Western Canadian market
after taking into account transportation costs.

Pipeline Political Risk: There has been substantial timing risk
around major pipeline projects in Canada, which have experienced
numerous delays due to entrenched social and environmental
opposition. These include Enbridge's Line 3 replacement (+370,000
bpd in incremental shipping capacity), the Keystone XL pipeline
(+830,000 bpd), and TransMountain Pipeline expansion (+590,000
bpd). Pipeline delays were a key factor in the collapse in WCS
differentials in the fall of 2018, which led to the need for
quotas. As stated, additional delays in new capacity could prolong
the quota, create additional project deferrals, and increase
reliance on rail to move product. Fitch expects that ENB's Line 3
will be the first of the major projects to come online in 2H 2020

IMO Impact May Be Lower Than Expected: The negative impacts of IMO
2020 on differentials for heavy oil such as WCS may be less than
earlier predicted. These regulations are expected to impact heavy
oil producers by increasing the supply of residual fuel oil, which
competes for space within a refinery with heavy crude oils.
However, changes in global supply dynamics among heavy oil
producers, including those caused by U.S. sanctions against Iran
and Venezuela as well as lower Mexican crude production, have
limited availability of heavy crudes in the USGC and resulted in
unexpected tightness for heavy sour grades, a factor which should
partially offset the pressure from excess residual fuel oil once
IMO 2020 is implemented. Increased rail capacity to the U.S. Gulf
Coast should also be beneficial in limiting the impact from IMO.

Adequate Liquidity, Maturity Runway: In 2Q19, MEG amended and
restated its RCF and its letter of credit facilities by extending
each facility by 2.75 years to a maturity date of July 30, 2024.
The revolver was reduced from a US$1.4 billion revolving credit
facility to a CAD800 million facility, while the letter of credit
facility was restated from a $440 million facility to a CAD500
million facility. There is no financial maintenance covenant unless
the revolver is drawn in excess of 50%, which would trigger a 1st
lien net debt to EBITDA covenant of 3.5x or less. Despite the
reduction in liquidity from the smaller size revolver, management
has no plans to draw down on the revolver. Fitch is comfortable
with the liquidity given cash was at CAD399 million as of June 30,
2019 and Fitch's expectation that the company will generate free
cash flow over the forecasted horizon. In addition, there are no
debt maturities until 2023.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

MEG is positioned in line with other 'B' rated E&P peers. Its
production size of 97,000 bbl/d (100% liquids) compares favorably
to Extraction Oil and Gas (XOG: B+/Stable) at 76,000 bbl/d (72%
liquids) and Magnolia (MGY: B/Positive) at 47,700 bbl/d (79%
liquids). At 4.4x, MEG's leverage is higher than its peers,
including SM Energy (B+/Stable) at 2.6x, and Extraction at 2.8x.
However, Fitch expects MEG's debt/EBITDA to decline as it reduces
debt with free cash flow. In addition, MEG has no near-term
financing risk, is not expected to borrow off of its CAD$800
million revolver any time soon, and has a covenant-lite revolver
that is not subject to a borrowing base redetermination.

Offsetting considerations include low diversification, given that
MEG is essentially a single-play oil sands producer and has
significant exposure to volatile WTI-WCS price differentials, given
the lack integration, especially when compared to larger Canadian
oil sands operators such as Suncor and Canadian Natural. Despite
the lack of diversification, MEG does have substantial proved and
probable reserves and has the ability to greatly expand capacity if
industry conditions are favorable.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  -- Base case WTI oil prices of $57.50 in 2019 and 2020 and a
long-term price of $55;

  -- Base case Henry Hub natural gas price of $2.75 throughout the
forecasted period;

  -- Production growth of 3% in 2019 and 12% in 2020 (assuming no
additional production curtailments) based on 2019 capex spend;

  -- Capex of $200 million in 2019 and $3000mm in 2020 based on
management guidance;

  -- No share repurchases, equity issuance, acquisitions, or
divestitures.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  - Actual debt reduction through the application of free cash flow
proceeds;

  - Mid-cycle debt/EBITDA in the 3.0-3.5x range;

  - Mid-cycle Lease Adjusted Net Leverage less than 3.5x.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  - Change in financial policy away from debt reduction at current
credit metrics;

  - Mid-cycle debt/EBITDA above 4.5x;

  - Mid-cycle Lease Adjusted Net Leverage greater than 4.5x;

  - Prolonged dislocation in WTI-WCS spreads.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Adequate Liquidity Position: As of June 30, 2019, MEG has CAD399
million of cash on hand and full availability under its CAD800
million revolver. The company also has a CAD500 million letters of
credit facility. Both facilities mature on July 30, 2024, although
the maturity will spring back to 91 days prior to the maturity date
of certain material debt is such debt has not been repaid or
refinanced prior to such date. The next material debt maturity is a
senior note that is due January 2023.

In 2Q19, MEG amended and restated its RCF and its letter of credit
facilities by extending each facility by 2.75 years to a maturity
date of July 30, 2024. The revolver was reduced from a U.S.$1.4
billion revolving credit facility to a CAD800 million facility,
while the letter of credit facility was restated from a $440
million facility to a CAD500 million facility. Despite the
reduction in liquidity from the smaller size revolver, management
has no plans to draw down on the revolver. There is no financial
maintenance covenant unless the revolver is drawn in excess of 50%,
which would trigger a 1st lien net debt to EBITDA covenant of 3.5x
or less.

Fitch expects MEG to generate free cash flow over the forecasted
horizon. Although the next maturity is not until 2023, MEG's debt
is callable, and Fitch anticipates the company will apply free cash
flow proceeds to calling the notes.

The recovery analysis assumes that MEG Energy would be reorganized
as a going-concern in bankruptcy rather than liquidated.

Fitch has assumed a 10% administrative claim.

Going-Concern (GC) Approach

MEG's GC EBITDA assumption reflects Fitch's projections under a
stressed case price deck, which assumes WTI oil prices of $50.00 in
2019, $42.50 in 2020, $45.00 in 2021, and $47.50 in 2022. Fitch
also adjusts for reduced production from its base case to reflect
reductions in capex under a stressed price environment.

The GC EBITDA estimate reflects Fitch's view of a sustainable,
post-reorganization EBITDA level upon which Fitch bases the
enterprise valuation. The GC EBITDA assumption uses 2022 EBITDA,
which reflects the decline from current pricing levels to stressed
levels and then a partial recovery coming out of a troughed pricing
environment.

An EV multiple of 4.5x EBITDA is applied to the GC EBITDA to
calculate a post-reorganization enterprise value, resulting in a
valuation of CAD3.3 billion. The choice of this multiple considered
the following factors:

  -- The historical bankruptcy case study exit multiples for peer
companies ranged from 2.8x-7.0x, with an average of 5.6x and a
median of 6.1x:

  -- There were very few recent Canadian M&A transactions and
multiple detail was either unavailable or not relatable;

  -- Fitch uses a multiple of 4.5x, to estimate a value for MEG
because there is not strong demand for Canadian assets and a
limited buyer set. This is offset by the moderate production size,
low SOR metrics, and improving transportation alternatives for its
production. In addition, the multiple reflects the relatively
higher proved reserves that reduces resource and volumetric risks
and provides for longer-term cash flow support despite shorter-term
market impacts.

  -- The multiple was reduced from 5.0x from the last rating action
to reflect better quality transaction data.

Liquidation Approach

The liquidation estimate reflects Fitch's view of the value of
balance sheet assets that can be realized in sale or liquidation
processes conducted during a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding
and distributed to creditors.

Despite the lack of Canadian E&P peer companies, the announced
transaction in which Devon Energy is selling its Canadian assets to
Canadian Natural Resources is a reasonable comparison given the
facility's location, size, and similar operations. That asset was
sold for $2.8 billion during a difficult M&A environment, which
makes the transaction a good proxy for a distressed sale. The value
per production (boe) was $22,000, which implies a valuation for MEG
at $2.7 billion. After including accounts receivable and inventory
and adjusting for foreign exchange rates, the liquidation value was
CAD3.0 billion, less than the going concern value.

The revolver is assumed to be fully drawn upon default. The
revolver is a first lien and senior in the waterfall.

The allocation of value in the liability waterfall results in
recovery corresponding to RR1 recovery for the first lien revolver
($800 million) and a recovery corresponding to RR1 for the senior
second lien notes (CAD982 million).

The senior unsecured notes (CAD2.356 million) have a 'RR'3 recovery
rating.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

Fitch has made no material adjustments that are not disclosed
within the company's public filings.


MRI OF LIBERTYVILLE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: MRI of Libertyville, LLC
        333 Peterson Road, Suite 230
        Libertyville, IL 60048

Business Description: MRI of Libertyville --
                      http://libertyvilleimaging.com-- is an
                      affiliate of Libertyville Imaging, Inc.  MRI
                      is in the business of performing CT and MRI
                      imaging services as a subcontractor for LIA.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 28, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Illinois (Eastern Division)

Case No.: 19-24343

Judge: Hon. Benjamin A. Goldgar

Debtor's Counsel: Alanna G. Morgan, Esq.
                  MORGAN & BLEY, LTD.
                  900 W. Jackson Blvd 4E
                  Chicago, IL 60607
                  Tel: (312) - 243-0006
                  Email: amorgan@morganandbleylimited.com

                    - and -

                  Keevan D. Morgan, Esq.
                  MORGAN & BLEY, LTD.
                  900 W. Jackson Blvd.
                  Chicago, IL 60607
                  Tel: 312 243-0006 Ext. 29
                  Fax: 312 243-0009
                  Email: kmorgan@morganandbleylimited.com

Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Shoukath Ahmed, manager.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb19-24343.pdf


NATURAL PRODUCTS: Sept. 6 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, Acting United States Trustee for Region 3, will hold an
organizational meeting on September 6, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. in the
bankruptcy case of Natural Product Association.

The meeting will be held at:

         Delaware State Bar Association
         405 King Street, 2nd Floor
         Wilmington, DE 19801

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it
represents.

             About Natural Products Association

Founded in 1936, Natural Products Association --
www.npanational.org -- is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the
natural products industry.  It is a trade association for dietary
supplements, natural health & sports nutrition, medical &
functional foods, probiotics, and natural personal/home care
products.

Natural Products Association filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 19-11849) on Aug. 19, 2019.
Hon. John T. Dorsey presides over the case.

The Debtor listed $1 million to $10 million in estimated assets and
estimated liabilities.

Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP is the Debtor's general bankruptcy
counsel. Cicero & Cole, LLP, is the Debtor's Delaware bankruptcy
counsel.  GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC, is the
financial advisor.


NELSON-WADE MANAGEMENT: Seeks Authority to Use Cash Collateral
--------------------------------------------------------------
Nelson-Wade Management Group, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Georgia its Second Amended
Motion for Authorization to Use Cash Collateral.

The Debtor's only creditor is Bank of North Georgia Synovus, which
holds a secured interest in the real estate located at 2219
Loganville Hwy, Grayson, GA 30017. Pursuant to that certain
Commercial Security Agreement, the Debtor gives Synovus a security
interest in the Real Estate as well as the accounts and equipment
of debtors. As of Feb. 25, 2019, Synovus is claiming that
$350,399.98 is due on the debt with interest accruing at the rate
of $50.16 per day.

A companion case was also filed by Comfort Dental Choice, PC in
Case No. 19-59879-LRC. Comfort Dental Choice leases the Debtor's
Real Estate for the operation of its dental office. Comfort Dental
Choice also owes Bank of Georgia Synovus a debt that is secured by
the Real Estate. The Debtor will be seeking joint administration of
the two cases.

             About Nelson-Wade Management Group

Nelson-Wade Management Group, a Georgia Limited Liability Company,
is a Single Asset Real Estate as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section
101(51B).

Nelson-Wade Management Group LLC sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-60132) on June
28, 2019.  In the petition signed by its authorized representative,
Dr. Alisa Nelson, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of
less than $1 million each.  The case is assigned to Judge Lisa
Ritchey Craig.  Rountree & Leitman, LLC, serves as the Debtor's
legal counsel.


NORTHSTAR ALARM: Modified Deal in Smothers Suit Has Prelim Approval
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, JULIAN SMOTHERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NORTHSTAR
ALARM SERVICES, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 2:17-cv-00548-KJM-KJN
(E.D. Cal.), Judge Kimberly J. Mueller of the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of California granted the Plaintiffs'
motion for preliminary approval of their modified settlement
agreement.

On Jan. 22, 2019, the Court granted in part and denied in part
several unopposed motions brought by Plaintiffs Smothers and Asa
Dhadda in connection with their proposed class action settlement
with the Defendant.  Specifically, the Court granted the
Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary certification of the California
Class, granted the Plaintiffs' request for appointment of the class
counsel, granted the Plaintiffs' motion to preliminarily certify
the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") group, and denied the
Plaintiffs' request for preliminary settlement approval under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the FLSA.

The parties then renewed their negotiations and reached a modified
settlement agreement to address the Court's concerns.  The
Plaintiffs now seek preliminary approval of their modified
settlement agreement, which NorthStar does not oppose.

Compared to their initial proposed settlement agreement, the
parties' revised proposed settlement agreement includes the
following modifications: the class counsel's request for attorneys'
fees will not exceed 25% of the gross settlement amount, which will
be subject to a lodestar cross-check, as opposed to the 33.33%
previously sought; settlement administration costs will not exceed
$50,000, as opposed to the $40,000 previously sough; and the
proposed notice and opt-in procedures for the FLSA group now comply
with 29 U.S.C. Section 216(b)'s opt-in requirement rather than
having group members opt-in by cashing a settlement check.

The parties have largely eliminated provisions permitting funds to
revert to NorthStar depending on the proportion of the class
members who opt-out or opt-in, depending on the class and have
explained the basis for their proposed distribution.  With these
changes, the parties have addressed the Court's concerns expressed
in its earlier order.  Judge Mueller therefore granted the
Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary approval of the settlement under
Rule 23 and the FLSA.

The Plaintiffs also request the Court approves their proposed class
administrator, notices, opt-in form and notice schedule.  They
propose Phoenix Settlement Administrators ("PSA") serve as
third-party administrator for purposes of the settlement.  Under
the parties' agreement, PSA will mail class notices to the
potential class members; determine individual settlement amounts;
conduct telephonic and online outreach campaigns; establish a
website with documents filed in the action; prepare, administer and
distribute the class members' settlement amounts; and issue a final
report to class counsel.  PSA also will provide weekly reports on
requests for exclusion and inclusion in the settlement to the class
counsel.  The Judge is satisfied that PSA is a capable
administrator and granted the Plaintiffs' motion to appoint PSA as
the class administrator.

As for the Notices, the Judge has reviewed the Plaintiffs' proposed
notices and opt-in form and required the changes in the following
sections as set forth in the Order: (i) Global Changes and
Clarifications; (ii) California Class Notice; (iii) FLSA Group
Notice; and (iv) FLSA Opt-In Form.

The Plaintiff has not provided an opt-out form for California
Members to return and complete, should they wish to opt-out.  The
Judge therefore ordered the Plaintiffs to draft an opt-out form for
California Class members that may be downloaded from the class
website.  The Class members will be required to navigate to the
website to download the form, providing the affirmative act counsel
requests, but will not be required to draft their own opt-out
letter, unless they so choose.  The California Class notice should
be modified to inform California Class members who wish to opt-out
that they may either send a letter containing the necessary opt-out
information or download, complete and send an opt-out form provided
on the class website.

In the common fund scenario, the Ninth Circuit has held that
motions for attorneys' fees must be filed before class objection
deadlines, as the plain text of the rule requires that any class
member be allowed an opportunity to object to the fee 'motion'
itself, not merely to the preliminary notice that such a motion
will be filed.  To satisfy these requirements, the Judge ordered
the Plaintiffs must file their motion for attorneys' fees, costs
and an incentive award to be heard with the motion for final
approval of their settlement to allow members sufficient time to
review the requests and object.  The motion must be filed at least
two weeks before member's written objections are due.  At the final
hearing, the Court will consider any written objections and hear
any oral objections to the fees, costs and incentive award
requests, along with any objections to the settlement itself.

Within seven days of the Order, either party may file objections,
if any, to the court's revisions.  Prior to filing any such
objection, the parties must meet and confer concerning the
objection and any proposed alternative resolution.  Any objections
must be explained concisely.  The Court will endeavor to rule on
any objections promptly.

Finally, the Judge ordered the Plaintiffs to implement the changes
required in the Order and file updated class notices and opt-out
forms, along with a proposed order approving the notices and forms
and issuance of the notice plan, within 21 days of the Order.

A full-text copy of the Court's July 12, 2019 Order is available at
https://is.gd/TUaOrU from Leagle.com.

Julian Smothers, Plaintiff, represented by Jared Hague Jared Hague
-- jared@suttonhague.com -- Sutton Hague Law Corporation, PC, S.
Brett Sutton -- brett@suttonhague.com -- Sutton Hague Law
Corporation, PC & Anthony Eugene Guzman -- anthony@suttonhague.com
-- Sutton Hague Law Corporation.

Asa Dhadda, Plaintiff, represented by Jared Hague, Sutton Hague
Law
Corporation, PC & S. Brett Sutton, Sutton Hague Law Corporation,
PC.

NorthStar Alarm Services, LLC, Defendant, represented by Andrew V.
Collins -- inquiries@mbmlawyers.com -- Mitchell Barlow &
Mansfield,
P.C., pro hac vice, J. Ryan Mitchell, Mitchell Barlow & Mansfield,
PC, pro hac vice & Claire Yvonne Dossier, Mitchell Barlow &
Mansfield, P.C.



PALM BEACH BRAIN: Seeks to Hire Kelley Fulton as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Palm Beach Brain and Spine, LLC, and its debtor affiliates seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of Florida (West Palm Beach) to employ Kelley Fulton & Kaplan, P.L.
as their legal counsel.

The firm will provide these services in connection with the
Debtors' Chapter 11 cases:

     a. advise the Debtors of their powers and duties in the
continued management of their business operations;

     b. advise the Debtors of their responsibilities in complying
with the U.S. Trustee's Operating Guidelines and Reporting
Requirements and with the rules of the court;

     c. prepare motions, pleadings, orders, applications, adversary
proceedings, and other legal documents necessary in the
administration of the cases;

     d. protect the interest of the Debtors in all matters pending
before the bankruptcy court; and

     e. represent the Debtors in negotiation with their creditors
in the preparation of a plan.

Kelley Fulton will be paid at an hourly rate of $450. The firm will
also be paid a retainer in the amount of $17,500, which includes
the filing fee of $1,717, and will receive reimbursement for
work-related expenses incurred.

Dana Kaplan, Esq., partner of Kelley Fulton, assured the court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Kelley Fulton can be reached at:

     Dana L. Kaplan, Esq.
     Kelley Fulton & Kaplan, P.L.
     1665 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd Suite 1000
     West Palm Beach, FL 33401
     Tel: (561) 491-1200
     Email: dana@kelleylawoffice.com

            About Palm Beach Brain & Spine

Palm Beach Brain & Spine -- http://www.pbbsneuro.com-- is a
medical practice providing neurosurgery, minimally invasive spine
surgery and treatment for cancer of the brain and spine.

Palm Beach Brain & Spine and two affiliates, Midtown Outpatient
Surgery Center, LLC and Midtown Anesthesia Group, LLC, concurrently
filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Lead Case No. 19-20831) on August
15, 2019. The petitions were signed by Dr. Amos O. Dare, manager.

Palm Beach Brain estimated $13,412,202 in assets and $2,685,278 in
liabilities. Midtown Outpatient estimated $6,857,558 and
$2,920,846, and Midtown Anesthesia estimated $5,081,861 in assets.


Dana L. Kaplan, Esq. and Craig I. Kelley, Esq., at Kelley Fulton &
Kaplan, P.L.  are the Debtors' counsel.


PARKINSON SEED: Trustee Hires Huber Erickson as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------------
Gary Rainsdon, the Chapter 11 trustee for Parkinson Seed Farm,
Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Idaho to retain David B. Lewis, CPA and his associates
with the accounting firm of Huber, Erickson & Bowman, LLC as the
estate's accountant,  

Huber, Erickson & Bowman, LLC is to assist the Trustee with
bookkeeping and related duties, in addition to the tax related work
and other services for which accountant is currently employed.

Huber Erickson's hourly rates are:

     Keena Ludwig, bookkeeper      $90.00
     Doreen Arellano, bookkeeper   $100.00
     Stacey Greenland, payroll     $100.00
     Amber Shimp, manager          $125.00
     David Lewis, partner          $350.00
     Nate Mendenhall, tax manager  $165.00

David Lewis, a certified public accountant employed with Huber,
disclosed in a court filing that he and his associates do not have
any connection with creditors of the Debtor.

Huber can be reached through:

     David B. Lewis
     Huber, Erickson & Bowman LLC CPAs   
     375 South 300 West   
     Salt Lake City, UT 84101     
     Telephone: (801) 328-5009            
     Email:  DLewis@hebcpa.com

          About Parkinson Seed Farm

Located in Saint Anthony, Idaho, Parkinson Seed Farm Inc. --
http://www.parkinsonseedfarm.com/-- farms 7,200 acres of potatoes.
It raises seed potatoes, hard red and hard white wheat, as well as
a small amount of alfalfa (mostly to feed horses for recreational
purposes).  The company raises 11 of what it considers to be more
mainstream varieties such as the Russet Burbank, Ranger, three
different line selections of Russet Norkotah, white varieties such
as Cal Whites and Atlantics, and reds like the Dark Red Norland.
The company was founded in 1937.

Parkinson Seed Farm sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Idaho Case No. 18-40412) on May 15,
2018.  In the petition signed by Dirk Parkinson, president, the
Debtor disclosed $6.11 million in assets and $26.92 million in
liabilities.

Judge Joseph M. Meier oversees the case.  

The Debtor hired Robinson & Associates as its legal counsel.


PDC ENERGY: S&P Puts 'BB-' ICR on Watch Positive on SRC Energy Deal
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed the ratings on Denver-based oil and gas
exploration and production (E&P) company PDC Energy Inc., including
the 'BB-' issuer credit rating, on CreditWatch with positive
implications.

The CreditWatch placement follows the company's announcement of the
acquisition of E&P peer SRC Energy Inc. for about $1.7 billion
including the assumption of debt. S&P expects PDC to fund the
acquisition with 100% equity and said the acquisition meaningfully
increases PDC's scale in its core operating area, allowing for
improved economies of scale and synergies.

The CreditWatch positive placement reflects PDC's increased scale
of operations combined with the maintenance of strong financial
measures following the acquisition of SRC Energy. Following the
acquisition, PDC will have a significant contiguous position in the
Denver-Julesburg (DJ) Basin of Colorado, with pro forma year-end
2018 proved reserves of about 730 million barrels of oil equivalent
(MMBoe), and total year-end 2018 proved reserves of about 850 MMBoe
including its assets in the Delaware Basin.

Likewise, pro forma total production will increase to about 197,300
Boe per day from PDC's 136,500 Boe per day as of June 30. Although
the transaction increases PDC's exposure to Colorado's tighter
regulatory environment, most reserves are in Weld County, which has
a history of working with the E&P industry, mitigating much of the
regulatory risk. In addition, the combination of 100% equity
financing and SRC's low leverage will allow PDC to maintain strong
financial measures following the acquisition, including funds from
operations (FFO) to debt of over 50%.

Improving scale while maintaining strong financial measures results
in the potential for a one-notch upgrade at the closing of the
acquisition.

"The CreditWatch placement reflects the likelihood that we could
raise our issuer credit rating on PDC by one notch to 'BB'
following the close of the SRC acquisition, assuming there are no
material changes to our current assumptions. The improved scale of
operations combined with low leverage make PDC more consistent with
'BB' peers in the E&P industry," S&P said. S&P intends to resolve
the CreditWatch around the close of the acquisition, which it
expects in the fourth quarter of 2019.


PEABODY ENERGY: Counties, City Appellants Enjoined from Prosecuting
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Appellants County of San Mateo, City of Imperial Beach, and County
of Marin filed the appeals case captioned County of San Mateo, City
of Imperial Beach, County of Marin, Appellants, v. Peabody Energy
Corp., Appellee, Case No. 4:17 CV 2886 RWS (E.D. Mo.) seeking to
overturn the bankruptcy court's order that they dismiss their
lawsuits against the Reorganized Peabody Energy Corporation. The
Bankruptcy Court ordered that Appellants dismiss their complaints
against the Reorganized PEC on the grounds that the causes of
action in those complaints constituted dischargeable claims that
Appellants failed to file before the deadline the bankruptcy court
set.

After a review of the briefs and the record, District Judge Rodney
W. Sippel finds that the bankruptcy court reached the correct legal
conclusion regarding the First Causes of Action in Appellants'
complaints and did not abuse its discretion regarding the remaining
causes of action. As a result, the Court affirms the bankruptcy
court's order.

Appellants raise four issues on appeal, which fall into two general
categories. The first issue requires the Court to determine whether
Appellants' First Causes of Action, which sought relief under a
statutory remedial provision that only allowed them to seek
abatement, raised claims that were discharged by the Chapter 11
Plan and Confirmation Order. The remaining issues pertain to
whether Appellants' causes of action were exempt from discharge
under certain exceptions included in the Chapter 11 Plan.

The Chapter 11 Plan contains provisions ("EPA Settlement
Provisions") that clarify the extent to which Environmental Law
claims and actions brought pursuant to a government entity's police
powers are exempt from discharge under the Plan. Those provisions
came after "significant negotiations between the Debtors, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior,
other governmental entities, and many Indian Nations as part of a
settlement in connection with the plan confirmation process (EPA
Settlement)." Appellants argue those provisions apply to their
claims and protect them from discharge.

In their First Causes of Action, Appellants seek equitable relief
under the Public Nuisance Enabling Statute for violation of
California's public nuisance law. Specifically, Appellants ask the
court to order Reorganized PEC to abate the nuisance they allegedly
caused. Next, in their Second Causes of Action, Appellants seek
damages under the California Civil Code, which defines public
nuisance and provides remedies.

The two causes of action arise from a breach of the same underlying
statute, Section 3479 of the California Civil Code, which describes
actionable nuisances.

Appellants contend that PEC's alleged breach of the public nuisance
statute did not give rise to both equitable relief and damages,
because the specific statutory provision on which their First
Causes of Action rely prohibits Appellants from using it to obtain
damages when they are suing on behalf of the People of the State of
California. They cite a number of California cases that make it
clear that when government plaintiffs sue on behalf of the People
of the State of California, they can only seek equitable relief.
Appellants also cite cases from other circuits that stand for the
proposition that a plaintiff's quest for equitable relief is not a
claim simply because the act that harmed the plaintiff gives rise
to a separate cause of action for damages under another statutory
scheme. These cases are not on point for the issue at hand. In this
case, the same alleged breach of California's public nuisance
statute did indeed give rise to both equitable relief and a right
to payment for these Appellants. Under the Bankruptcy Code, the
equitable relief they seek is therefore a claim.

The Third, Fourth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Causes of Action in
Appellants' complaint against PEC are brought under the common law.
Appellants argue they meet the Plan's carve-out for "equivalents"
of "state and local statutes, regulations, and ordinances
concerning pollution or protection of the environment, or
environmental impacts on human health and safety." The bankruptcy
court's conclusion that the Third, Fourth, Sixth, Seventh, and
Eighth Causes of Action were discharged under the Chapter 11 Plan
was not an abuse of discretion.

According to the bankruptcy court, the Plan's definition did not
contemplate exempting ordinary common law tort actions from
discharge. The bankruptcy court's interpretation was correct.
Section A of the EPA Settlement Provisions does not save these
common law claims from discharge.

The bankruptcy court's order enjoining Appellants from prosecuting
the PEC causes of action and directing that Appellants promptly
dismiss the PEC causes of action with prejudice is affirmed.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum and Order dated March 29, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2Nwe0Sw from Leagle.com.

Heather Lennox , Pro Hac Vice, Jones Day, Cleveland, OH, for
Reorganized Debtors.

Matthew E. McClintock , Goldstein and McClintock LLP, Chicago, IL,
for Appellants.

Steven N. Cousins , Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, MO, Heather
Lennox , Pro Hac Vice, Jones Day, Cleveland, OH, Matthew Curtis
Corcoran , Pro Hac Vice, Jones Day, Columbus, OH, for Appellee.

               About Peabody Energy Corporation

Headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, Peabody Energy Corporation --
http://www.PeabodyEnergy.com/-- claims to be the world's largest
private-sector coal company. As of Dec. 31, 2014, the Company owned
interests in 26 active coal mining operations located in the U.S.
and Australia.  The Company has a majority interest in 25 of those
mining operations and a 50% equity interest in the Middlemount Mine
in Australia.  In addition to its mining operations, the Company
markets and brokers coal from other coal producers, both as
principal and agent, and trade coal and freight-related contracts
through trading and business offices in Australia, China, Germany,
India, Indonesia, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the U.S.

At Dec. 31, 2015, the Company had total assets of $11.02 billion
against $10.1 billion in total liabilities, and stockholders'
equity of $919 million.

On April 13, 2016, Peabody Energy Corp. and 153 affiliates filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code. The 154 cases are jointly administered
before the Honorable Judge Barry S. Schermer under (Bankr. E.D. Mo.
Case No. 16-42529).

As of the Petition Date, PEC has approximately $4.3 billion in
outstanding secured debt obligations and $4.5 billion in
outstanding unsecured debt obligations.

The Debtors tapped Jones Day as general counsel; Armstrong,
Teasdale LLP as local counsel; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC and
investment banker Lazard PTY Limited as investment banker; FTI
Consulting, Inc., as financial advisors; and Kurtzman Carson
Consultants, LLC, as claims, ballot and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on April 29, 2016, appointed seven
creditors of Peabody Energy Corp. to serve on the official
committee of unsecured creditors. The Committee retained Morrison &
Foerster LLP as counsel, Spencer Fane LLP as local counsel, Curtis,
Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as conflicts counsel, Blackacre
LLC as its independent expert, and Berkeley Research Group, LLC, as
financial advisor.

On March 17, 2017, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Missouri, Eastern Division, entered an order confirming
the Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of Peabody Energy
Corporation, et al., as Revised March 15, 2017.  At 4:01 p.m.
(Eastern Time), on April 3, 2017, the Effective Date of the Plan
occurred.


PHILADELPHIA AUTHORITY: S&P Cuts 2016A Rev. Bond Rating to BB+
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term ratings one notch to 'BB+
(sf)' and 'BB (sf)' from 'BBB- (sf)' and 'BB+ (sf)' on Philadelphia
Authority for Industrial Development's series 2016A and subordinate
2016B senior housing revenue bonds (The Pavilion). At the same
time, S&P removed the ratings from CreditWatch, where they had been
placed with negative implication on July 25, 2019. The outlook is
negative.

"The downgrades follow our revised view of the strategy and
management to highly vulnerable from vulnerable, owing to
deterioration in the track record and operational effectiveness, as
demonstrated by recent cash flow volatility and technical defaults,
at other projects under the same parent-ownership and management
structure," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Daniel Pulter.

Under S&P's criteria, the rating is capped at 'BB+' in accordance
with its highly vulnerable strategy and management assessment.
S&P's view of owner JPC Charities, and PF Holdings LLC as manager,
is also informed by repeated difficulty in obtaining critical
fiscal 2018 financial information for several projects under the
same parent-ownership and management structure. The rating agency
has found that difficulty in gathering critical and required
information related to a project typically proceeds financial and
operational performance declines.

"Additionally, the outlook reflects our expectation that the
project's financial position may deteriorate further in 2019 if
expenses are not managed, and if sharp year-over-year increases
occur similar to 2018," Mr. Pulter added. "Accordingly, we assess
at least a one-in-three likelihood of a downgrade within the
one-year outlook period."


PITNEY BOWES: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms 'BB+' Rating
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed all ratings on Pitney Bowes Inc. and
the company's debt based on its view that management will keep
leverage under 3.5x and proactively manage the upcoming $800
million of debt maturities coming due in 2020.  The rating agency
withdrew its 'B' short-term issuer credit rating, saying the
company no longer has an active commercial paper program.

The rating actions follow Pitney Bowes' announcement of an
agreement to sell its software business to Syncsort for $700
million of gross proceeds in an all-cash transaction.  S&P expects
that proceeds from this transaction, which is expected to close by
the end of calendar 2019, combined with the firm's recent dividend
cut will support stable leverage levels.

Meanwhile, S&P revised its outlook on Pitney Bowes to stable from
negative, reflecting the rating agency's expectation that proceeds
from the sale of the software business will enable the firm to
maintain adjusted leverage at or below the mid-3x area in spite of
ongoing margin pressure from declining revenues in the highly
profitable small and midsize business (SMB) segment.

The outlook revision to stable is based on S&P's expectation that
$700 million of gross pre-tax proceeds from the sale of the firm's
software business (the rating agency expects the majority of net
proceeds to be used to repay debt), combined with recent dividend
cuts and other reductions in shareholder returns, will give the
firm sufficient liquidity to maintain financial leverage at or
under the mid-3x area through a challenging business reorientation
toward commerce services. S&P views an uncertain path to
profitability at the rapidly growing e-commerce segment, ongoing
declines in print mail volume, and a need to refinance a
significant $800 million combined note and loan maturity in 2020 as
key credit risks, but believes that management's recent
debtholder-friendly actions have been sufficient to support the
'BB+' rating for at least the next 12 months.

S&P's stable outlook on Pitney Bowes reflects its expectation that
proceeds from the sale of its software business will enable the
firm to maintain adjusted leverage at or below the mid-3x area in
spite of ongoing margin pressure from declining revenues in the
highly profitable SMB segment. The rating agency expects continued
growth in commerce services to support stable revenues through 2020
and growing scale in global ecommerce will enable consolidated
margins to recover somewhat in 2020.

"We could lower our ratings on Pitney Bowes if the company is
unable to sustain its organic revenue growth, if it fails to
improve the margins in its digital commerce business, or if it
fails to sustain a more conservative financial policy such that
debt to EBITDA remains above the mid-3x area pro forma for the sale
of its software business," S&P said, adding that the firm has
essentially no room within the current rating category to return
any capital to shareholders outside its currently reduced dividend.
Failure to proactively address upcoming debt maturities in 2020
could also lead to a downgrade over the next 12 months, according
to the rating agency.

An upgrade is highly unlikely over the next 12 months, due to
uncertainty around Pitney Bowes' business transition and the margin
path of commerce services, S&P further said. Over the longer term,
S&P would look to e-commerce EBITDA margins in at least the
mid-teens, a consistently conservative financial policy, and
leverage sustained under 2x for an upgrade.


PMHC II: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'CCC+' on Unsustainable Debt Levels
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on PMHC II Inc.
and its issue-level rating on its first-lien secured credit
facility, which comprises a $85 million senior secured revolving
credit facility and a $515 million first-lien secured term loan, to
'CCC+' from 'B-'. S&P's '3' recovery rating on the first-lien
facility remains unchanged.

At the same time, S&P lowered its issue-level rating on the
company's $150 million second-lien secured term loan to 'CCC' from
'CCC+'. Its '5' recovery rating on the term loan remains
unchanged.

The downgrade reflects PMHC's weakened operating performance
through the first half of 2019 and S&P's view that the company's
capital structure may be unsustainable over the longer term given
its declining earnings, limited cash generation, and the continued
weakness in its Electronics and Specialties segment due to the
lower demand for alkaline battery chemicals, which has been
negatively affected by competition, inventory destocking, and
higher raw material costs. S&P believes that the company will
maintain these weakened credit metrics over the next 12 months.
PMHC has dealt with elevated raw material costs, customer inventory
destocking, and continued volume declines in its battery business,
which have lead it to post weaker-than-expected profitability and
credit measures. The company's S&P-adjusted EBITDA for the second
quarter of 2019 underperformed the rating agency's previous
expectations by the double-digit percent area. Although S&P expects
the second half of the year to be slightly better for the company
than the first half, it still forecasts minimal free cash flow
generation for 2019 and believes that the company's credit metrics
will remain at unsustainable levels on an S&P-adjusted weighted
average basis.

The stable outlook on PMHC II reflects S&P's expectation that the
company's leverage metrics will remain at unsustainable levels over
the next 12 months. The company's operating performance has
weakened quarter over quarter relative to S&P's previous
expectations, because of volume declines across nearly all of its
segments, and the volumes in its battery chemicals business have
continued to deteriorate. This has weakened the company's operating
performance and leverage metrics to unsustainable levels as the
rating agency expects it to maintain S&P-adjusted leverage in the
double digits in 2019.

"We could lower our rating on PMHC II if its end-market demand
continues to weaken, leading to additional volume declines, or if
it is unable to execute on its growth initiatives or adequately
pass along its raw material costs such that its adjusted leverage
increases beyond our expectation of about 10x as of year-end 2019
because of continued deterioration in its alkaline battery
chemicals business," S&P said.

"Although less likely, we could lower our ratings if the company's
liquidity deteriorated such that we view a covenant breach under
its revolving credit facility as likely over the next 12 months.
This could occur if its borrowings under the $85 million revolving
credit facility increase to more than 35% of the commitment amount
and cause the covenant to spring as its EBITDA weakens by more than
we expect, leading to a very tight covenant cushion," S&P said,
adding that it could also lower the ratings if the company pursues
any large debt-funded shareholder rewards or acquisitions.

S&P said it could raise its rating on PMHC II over the next year if
the company improves its margins by at least 400 basis points (bps)
by focusing on its higher-margin specialty chemicals products. The
rating agency expressed belief this would be supported by increased
demand in the company's key end markets (particularly construction,
agriculture, steel, electronics, and oil and gas), elevated
volumes, and an improvement in its battery segment.

"Specifically, we could take a positive rating action if elevated
end-market demand increased the company's volumes by more than we
currently project, allowing it to sustain adjusted debt to EBITDA
in the single digits," S&P said, adding that continued successful
acquisition integration and cost-savings initiatives would further
support a positive rating action.


PORTAGE BIOTECH: Delays Interim Filings, OSC Issues FFCTO
---------------------------------------------------------
Portage Biotech Inc. is providing an update on the status of the
filing of its audited annual financial statements for the year
ended March 31, 2019, accompanying management discussion and
analysis together with the related certifications (collectively,
the "Annual Filings").  The Annual Filings have been completed but
are currently being reviewed for quality assurance by the Company's
auditors.  The Company anticipates that final approval and posting
of the Annual Filings on www.sedar.com will be completed shortly.

As a consequence of the delay in the preparation of the Annual
Filings, the Company also disclosed that the filing of its
financial statements for the three-month period ended June 30,
2019, accompanying management discussion and analysis together with
the related certifications (the "Interim Filings") will also be
delayed and not released as required on August 29, 2019.  The
Company expects the Interim Filings to be filed shortly after the
Annual Filings are filed.

On August 2, 2019, the Ontario Securities Commission (the "OSC")
issued a Failure-to-File Cease Trade Order against the Company on
(the "FFCTO") as a result of the Company's failure to the Annual
Filings by the prescribed filing deadline of July 29, 2019, as
required by National Instrument 51-102, Continuous Disclosure
Obligations, and NI 52-109, Certification of Disclosure in Issuers'
Annual and Interim Filings, respectively. The FFCTO remains in
place.

The Company reports that since its news release of July 31, 2019,
there have been no material changes regarding the information
contained in that news release.  Further, there is no other
material information concerning the affairs of the Company that has
not been generally disclosed.

Portage (PBT.U, OTC Markets: PTGEF) is a biotechnology company
focused on developing best-in-class or first-in-class therapeutics.
It nurtures the creation of early- to mid-stage, first- and
best-in-class therapies for a variety of cancers, by providing
funding, strategic business and clinical counsel, and shared
services, to enable efficient, turnkey execution of
commercially-informed development plans.


POWER SOLUTIONS: Appoints Guogang Wu as Replacement Director
------------------------------------------------------------
Huisheng Liu submitted his resignation from the Board of Directors
of Power Solutions International, Inc. and all committees thereof,
effective Aug. 20, 2019.  Mr. Liu was a member of the Board's
compensation committee.  The Company said Mr. Liu's resignation is
not based upon any disagreement with the Company on any matter
relating to the respective operations, policies, or practices of
the Company.  Mr. Liu was a director designated by Weichai America
Corp., a significant stockholder of the Company, pursuant to the
Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2017, by and
between the Company and Weichai.  Weichai designated Guogang Wu for
appointment as a director pursuant to the Investor Rights
Agreement, and, on Aug. 20, 2019, the Board appointed Mr. Wu as a
director effective immediately.

Mr. Wu, age 41, has served as the chief financial officer,
International Business of Weichai Group Holdings Limited, a
multi-field and multi-industry international group which owns six
business segments made up of powertrain, intelligent logistics,
automotive, construction machinery, luxury yacht and finance &
after-services, and an affiliate of Weichai, since 2014.  Mr. Wu
also serves as a member of the board of directors of Weichai and a
number of Weichai affiliates.  Mr. Wu joined Weichai Group in 2012
and previously served as Senior Manager, International Business.
Prior to joining Weichai Group, Mr. Wu was employed at
PriceWaterhouseCoopers in various roles of increasing seniority
from 2003 until 2012.  Mr. Wu earned a Bachelor's Degree in
International Business in July 2000 and a Master's Degree in
Management in March 2003 from School of Management, University of
Science and Technology Beijing, China.

In connection with his appointment to the Board, Mr. Wu will be
compensated with an annual retainer fee of $50,000 and $1,000 for
each Board and committee meeting.

                    About Power Solutions

Headquartered in Wood Dale, Illinois, Power Solutions
International, Inc. designs, engineers, and manufactures
emissions-certified, alternative-fuel power systems.  PSI provides
integrated turnkey solutions to global original equipment
manufacturers in the industrial and on-road markets. The Company's
unique in-house design, prototyping, engineering and testing
capacities allow PSI to customize clean, high-performance engines
that run on a wide variety of fuels, including natural gas,
propane, biogas, gasoline and diesel.

Power Solutions reported a net loss available to common
stockholders of $85.47 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, a
net loss available to common stockholders of $47.47 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016, and a net loss available to common
stockholders of $2.89 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015. As
of Dec. 31, 2017, Power Solutions had $247.01 million in total
assets, $214.84 million in total liabilities, and $32.17 million in
total stockholders' equity.

BDO USA, LLP, in Chicago, Illinois, the Company's auditor since
2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
May 16, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, citing that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and significant
uncertainties exist about the Company's ability to refinance,
extend, or repay outstanding indebtedness, the circumstances of
which raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


POWER SOLUTIONS: Delays Filing of Second Quarter Form 10-Q
----------------------------------------------------------
Power Solutions International, Inc., filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission a Form 12b-25 notifying the delay in the filing
of its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2019.

Power Solutions was unable to file, without unreasonable effort and
expense, the Quarterly Report as its focus is on the preparation,
finalization and audit or review, as applicable, of the Company's
financial statements to be included in its Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, and its Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q for the requisite quarters in 2018.  The delay in filing
the 2018 Filings, as well as the Form 10-Q's for the periods ended
March 31, and June 30, 2019, is a consequence of the time and
effort necessary to complete the remaining delinquent financial
statements following the Company's filing on May 16, 2019, of
certain restated and then delinquent financial statements in the
Company's Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  The Company
does not expect to file the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2019 on or before the expiration of the five calendar day extension
period provided in Rule 12b-25(b).  The Company plans to file the
Form 10-Q as soon as practicable following the completion of the
2018 Filings.

                      About Power Solutions

Headquartered in Wood Dale, Illinois, Power Solutions
International, Inc. designs, engineers, and manufactures
emissions-certified, alternative-fuel power systems.  PSI provides
integrated turnkey solutions to global original equipment
manufacturers in the industrial and on-road markets. The Company's
unique in-house design, prototyping, engineering and testing
capacities allow PSI to customize clean, high-performance engines
that run on a wide variety of fuels, including natural gas,
propane, biogas, gasoline and diesel.

Power Solutions reported a net loss available to common
stockholders of $85.47 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, a
net loss available to common stockholders of $47.47 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016, and a net loss available to common
stockholders of $2.89 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As
of Dec. 31, 2017, Power Solutions had $247.01 million in total
assets, $214.84 million in total liabilities, and $32.17 million in
total stockholders' equity.

BDO USA, LLP, in Chicago, Illinois, the Company's auditor since
2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
May 16, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, citing that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and significant
uncertainties exist about the Company's ability to refinance,
extend, or repay outstanding indebtedness, the circumstances of
which raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


PROFESSIONAL FLOOR: Sept. 25 Plan Confirmation Hearing
------------------------------------------------------
The disclosure statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan filed by
Professional Floor Covering and Cleaning, Incorporated dated August
19, 2019 is approved.

September 18, 2019 is fixed as the last day for filing written
acceptances or rejections of the plan.  September 25, 2019 at 09:30
AM is fixed for the hearing on confirmation of the plan.
September 18, 2019 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
pursuant to Rule 3020(b)(1) written objections to confirmation of
the plan.

Class 22: Allowed General Unsecured Claims are impaired. Each
holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim will receive a Pro
Rata Share of the Reorganized Debtor’s Net After Tax Cash Flow
for years 2019 - 2023. Said distributions will be paid in five
annual installments, on or before July 1 of years 2020 - 2024,
respectively. Beginning in 2025, each holder of an Allowed General
Unsecured Claim shall receive an annual payment on or before July 1
in an amount of each holder’s Pro Rata Share of the proceeds from
the Stoudenmier Notes described in Article 7.3 of the Plan that are
received by the Reorganized Debtor in the year prior to the payment
date with said payments continuing until the earlier of the full
satisfaction of all Allowed Class 22 Claims or the satisfaction of
the Stoudenmier Notes.

Class 1: Secured Tax Claims are impaired. Each holder of an Allowed
Secured Tax Claim shall be paid the Allowed Amount of its Allowed
Secured Tax Claim, at the option of the Reorganized Debtor: (a) in
full, in Cash, on the Effective Date or as soon as practicable
thereafter; (b) upon such other terms as may be mutually agreed
upon between such holder of an Allowed Secured Claim and the
Reorganized Debtor; or (c) in monthly payments commencing with the
first full calendar month following the Effective Date, in an
aggregate amount equal to such Allowed Secured Tax Claim.

Class 2: Allowed Secured Claim of Ally related to a 2014 Chevrolet
van, VIN#1GCWGGBGXE1127915 are impaired. This Claim amount, with
interest accruing thereon at the contract rate of 7.4% per annum
from the Petition Date to the Effective Date, shall be treated as a
fully Secured Claim to be paid in full with post-confirmation
interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, plus any costs approved by
the Court relative to this Claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(b),
less any post-petition payments made by the Debtor.

Class 3: Allowed Secured Claim of Ally related to a 2013 Chevrolet
Express Cube Van, VIN#1GB3G3BG6D1104971 are impaired. This Claim
amount, with interest accruing thereon at the contract rate of
6.54% per annum from the Petition Date to the Effective Date, shall
be treated as a fully Secured Claim to be paid in full with
post-confirmation interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, plus any
costs approved by the Court relative to this Claim pursuant to 11
U.S.C. § 506(b), less any post-petition payments made by the
Debtor.

Class 4: Allowed Secured Claim of Ally related to a 2014 Chevrolet
van, VIN#1GCVKREC9EZ132894 are impaired. This Claim amount, with
interest accruing thereon at the contract rate of 6.74% per annum
from the Petition Date to the Effective Date, shall be treated as a
fully Secured Claim to be paid in full with postconfirmation
interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, plus any costs approved by
the Court relative to this claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(b),
less any postpetition payments made by the Debtor.

Class 5: Allowed Secured Claim of Ally related to a 2014 Chevrolet
van, VIN#1GCZGUBGXE1124802 are impaired. This Claim amount, with
interest accruing thereon at the contract rate of 6.25% per annum
from the Petition Date to the Effective Date, shall be treated as a
fully Secured Claim to be paid in full with post-confirmation
interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, plus any costs approved by
the Court relative to this Claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(b),
less any post-petition payments made by the Debtor.

Class 6: Allowed Secured Claim of Ally related to a 2018 Chevrolet
Silverado, VIN#1GC4K0EY0JF141062 are impaired. This Claim amount,
with interest accruing thereon at the contract rate of 6.95% per
annum from the Petition Date to the Effective Date, shall be
treated as a fully Secured Claim to be paid in full with
post-confirmation interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, plus any
costs approved by the Court relative to this claim pursuant to 11
U.S.C. § 506(b), less any post-petition payments made by the
Debtor.

Class 7: Allowed Secured Claim of Ally related to a 2015 Chevrolet
van, VIN#3N63M0YN5FK695348 are impaired. This Claim amount, with
interest accruing thereon at the contract rate of 5.65% per annum
from the Petition Date to the Effective Date shall be treated as a
fully Secured Claim to be paid in full with postconfirmation
interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, plus any costs approved by
the Court relative to this claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(b),
less any postpetition payments made by the Debtor.

Class 8: Allowed Secured Claim of Ally related to a 2015 Chevrolet
van, VIN#1GCZGUCGXF1273498 are impaired. This Claim amount, with
interest accruing thereon at the contract rate of 4.99% per annum
from the Petition Date to the Effective Date, shall be treated as a
fully Secured Claim to be paid in full with post-confirmation
interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, plus any costs approved by
the Court relative to this claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(b),
less any post-petition payments made by the Debtor.

Class 9: Allowed Secured Claim of Ally related to a 2016 Chevrolet
Tahoe, VIN#1GNSKCKC8GR426091 are impaired. This Claim shall be
treated as a Secured Claim in the amount of $45,475, to be paid in
full with interest from the Petition Date at 6.5% per annum, plus
any costs approved by the Court relative to this claim pursuant to
11 U.S.C. § 506(b), less any postpetition payments made by the
Debtor.

Class 10: Allowed Secured Claim of Ally related to a 2015 Chevrolet
Silverado, VIN#1GC4K0E80FF630259 are impaired. This Claim amount,
with interest accruing thereon at the contract rate of 4.99% per
annum from the Petition Date to the Effective Date, shall be
treated as a fully Secured Claim to be paid in full with
post-confirmation interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, plus any
costs approved by the Court relative to this Claim pursuant to 11
U.S.C. § 506(b), less any post-petition payments made by the
Debtor.

Class 11: Allowed Secured Claim of Ally related to a 2014 Chevrolet
van, VIN#1GCZGUBAXE1213832 are impaired. This Claim amount, with
interest accruing thereon at the contract rate of 4.95% per annum
from the Petition Date to the Effective Date, shall be treated as a
fully secured Claim to be paid in full with post-confirmation
interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, plus any costs approved by
the Court relative to this Claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(b),
less any post-petition payments made by the Debtor.

Class 12: Allowed Secured Claim of Ally related to a 2013 Chevrolet
van, VIN#1GC4K1E80DF132498 are impaired. This Claim amount, with
interest accruing thereon at the contract rate of 5.90% per annum
from the Petition Date to the Effective Date, shall be treated as a
fully Secured Claim to be paid in full with post-confirmation
interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, plus any costs approved by
the Court relative to this Claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(b),
less any post-petition payments made by the Debtor.

Class 13: Allowed Secured Claim of Ally related to a 2017 Chevrolet
van, VIN#1GCZGHFG3H1292044 are impaired. This Claim amount, with
interest accruing thereon at the contract rate of 6.59% per annum
from the Petition Date to the Effective Date, shall be treated as a
fully Secured Claim to be paid in full with post-confirmation
interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, plus any costs approved by
the Court relative to this Claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(b),
less any post-petition payments made by the Debtor.

Class 14: Allowed Secured Claim of Ally related to a 2015 Chevrolet
van, VIN#1GB3GSCG0H1101868 are impaired. This Claim amount, with
interest accruing thereon at the contract rate of 7.30% per annum
from the Petition Date to the Effective Date, shall be treated as a
fully Secured Claim to be paid in full with post-confirmation
interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, plus any costs approved by
the Court relative to this Claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(b),
less any post-petition payments made by the Debtor.

Class 15: Allowed Secured Claim of Complete Business Solutions
Group are impaired. Payments on account of Complete Business
Solutions Group’s Secured Claim shall begin in the first full
calendar month following the Effective Date and shall be made in
equal monthly installments of principal and interest, with interest
at 5% per annum, over 120 months with no prepayment penalty.

Class 16: Allowed Secured Claim of Aztec are impaired. Payments on
account of Aztec’s secured claim shall begin in the first full
calendar month following the Effective Date and shall be made in
equal monthly installments of principal and interest, with interest
at 5% per annum, over 60 months with no prepayment penalty.

Class 17: Allowed Secured Claim of Ozark are impaired. Payments on
account of Ozark’s secured claim shall begin in the first full
calendar month following the Effective Date and shall be made in
equal monthly installments of principal and interest at 5% per
annum on the unpaid balance and amortized for 300 months. Payments
shall continue for 59 months with a balloon payment due on the 60th
month, which may be renewed or negotiated. There shall be no
prepayment penalty.

Class 18: Allowed Secured Claim of MBFS are impaired. MBFS shall
receive no distributions from the Estate or the Reorganized Debtor.
To the extent necessary, the filing of the Plan shall constitute a
motion for approval of the transfer and related relief described
herein.

Class 19: Allowed Priority Unsecured Claim of Blythe are impaired.
The holder of the Allowed Class 19 Claim will be paid the full
amount of his Allowed Priority Unsecured Claims within ninety days
following the Effective Date of the Plan in full satisfaction of
such Claim.

Class 20: Allowed Unsecured Convenience Claims are impaired.
Holders of Allowed Class 20 Claims will be paid the full amount of
their Allowed Unsecured Claims as of the Petition Date, not to
exceed $1,000.00 each, in a single distribution within ninety days
following the Effective Date of the Plan in full satisfaction of
such Claim.

Class 21: Allowed Unsecured Claims of Necessary Vendors are
impaired. These Claims shall be treated as unsecured obligations of
the Reorganized Debtor. Each holder of an Allowed Unsecured Claim
of Necessary Vendors will be paid the full amount of their Claim as
it existed on the Petition Date on or before October 1, 2019.

Class 23: Equity Interests are impaired. In return for a new value
contribution of $5,000 and a waiver of all debts owed to
Stoudenmier by either the Debtor or TMS, Stoudenmier will retain
100% of the Equity Interests in the Reorganized Debtor.

The Debtor is confident that there will be sufficient funds on hand
to satisfy the minimum distributions required under Section
1129(a)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code and the obligations of the
Reorganized Debtor under the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 19, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y5hzebbp from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                About Professional Floor Covering
                    and Cleaning, Incorporated

Professional Floor Covering and Cleaning, Incorporated operates a
flooring store in Mooresville, North Carolina.

Professional Floor Covering and Cleaning sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. N.C. Case No.
18-50405) on June 26, 2018.  In the petition signed by Thomas M.
Stoudenmier II, president, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  

Judge Laura T. Beyer presides over the case.  The Debtor tapped
Richard S. Wright, Esq., at Moon Wright & Houston, PLLC, as its
bankruptcy counsel.


PROGISTIC CARRIERS: Seeks to Hire JS Whitworth as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Progistic Carriers, L.L.C. seeks authority from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (McAllen) to
hire JS Whitworth Law Firm, PLLC as its legal counsel.

Progistic Carriers requires JS Whitworth to:

   (a) provide legal advice with respect to the Debtor's rights and
duties as debtor-in-possession and continued business operations;

   (b) assist, advise and represent the Debtor in analyzing the
Debtor's capital structure, investigating the extent and validity
of liens, cash collateral stipulations or contested matters;

   (c) assist, advise and represent the Debtor in post-petition
financing transactions;

   (d) assist, advise and represent the Debtor in the sale of
certain assets;

   (e) assist, advise and represent the Debtor in the formulation
of a disclosure statement and plan of reorganization and to assist
the Debtor in obtaining confirmation and consummation of a plan of
reorganization;

   (f) assist, advise and represent the Debtor in any manner
relevant to preserving and protecting the Debtor's estate;

   (g) investigate and prosecute preference, fraudulent transfer
and other actions arising under Debtor's bankruptcy        avoiding
powers;

   (h) prepare on behalf the Debtor all necessary applications,
motions, answers, orders, reports, and other legal papers;

   (i) appear in Court and to protect the interests of the Debtor
before the Court;

   (j) assist the Debtor in administrative matters;

   (k) perform all other legal services for the Debtor which may be
necessary and proper in these proceedings;

   (l) assist, advise and represent the Debtor in any litigation
matters, including, but not limited to, adversary       
proceedings;

   (m) continue to assist and advise the Debtor in general
corporate and other matters related to the successful
reorganization of the Debtor;

   (n) provide other legal advice and services, as requested by the
Debtor, from time to time.

JS Whitworth will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                $300
     Legal Assistants         $125

The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Jana Smith Whitworth, a partner at JS Whitworth Law Firm, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

JS Whitworth can be reached at:

     Jana Smith Whitworth, Esq.
     JS Whitworth Law Firm, PLLC
     112 E. Kiwi Avenue
     McAllen, TX 78504
     Tel: (956) 371-1933
     Email: janaswhitworth@gmail.com

              About Progistic Carriers

Progistic Carriers is a privately held company in the general
freight trucking business.

Progistic Carriers filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Case No. 19-70327) on August 16, 2019. In the petition signed by
Benjamin Cavazos, member, the Debtor estimated $3,322,681 in assets
and $7,302,264 in liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Eduardo V Rodriguez.

Jana Smith Whitworth, Esq. at JS Whitworth Law Firm, PLLC, is the
Debtor's counsel.


R & C PROPERTIES: Unsecureds to Get Full Payment Over 90 Days
-------------------------------------------------------------
R & C Properties of Wilmington, LLC, filed a Second Amended Plan of
Reorganization proposing that Class 5 - General Unsecured Claims,
in the approximate total amount of $5,807, will be paid in full
over a period of ninety (90) days beginning after the Effective
Date.

Class 4 - Aquesta Bank are impaired. Aquesta will be allowed a
fully secured claim in the Bankruptcy Case in the amount of
$1,060,000.  Within 12 months of the Effective Date of the Plan,
the Debtor shall either refinance its outstanding obligation to
Aquesta or sell Debtor's real properties located at 5006 Randall
Parkway, Wilmington, NC, and 4951 University Drive, Wilmington, NC,
such that the proceeds of any refinance or sale(s) of the Real
Properties shall be sufficient to pay Aquesta $980,000.  The Real
Properties shall remain property of the estate notwithstanding
confirmation and 11 U.S.C. Section 1141(b), and therefore any
proposed refinance of the Release Price or sale of either of the
Real Properties shall be subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy
Court.  During the Refinance/Sale Period, the Debtor shall pay
interest on its outstanding obligation to Aquesta in the amount of
$3,575.00 per month. The Debtor additionally shall make monthly
payments to Aquesta in the amount of $934.00. During the
Refinance/Sale Period, the Debtor shall assign to Aquesta the right
to receive all rental payments due to the Debtor from the lessee of
the University Drive Property.  During each month of the
Refinance/Sale Period and to the extent that Aquesta timely
receives the payments contemplated in this paragraph from Debtor
and Lessee, Aquesta shall deposit a total of $1,254.00 ($320.00
from the assigned rental payments plus $934.00 directly received
from Debtor) into an escrow account that Aquesta will hold for the
benefit of Debtor. Aquesta shall apply the funds held in the escrow
account to taxes and insurance as those amounts become due and
payable. The Debtor shall remit all insurance bills related to the
Real Properties to Aquesta, which Aquesta shall pay up to the
amounts then currently held in escrow. In addition, on the
Effective Date of the plan, Debtor’s counsel, Richard P. Cook,
shall transfer to Aquesta all amounts currently held in his trust
account for Debtor, and Aquesta shall hold such funds in the escrow
account subject to the terms of this agreement.  Payments from the
Lessee shall be due as provided under the applicable lease.
Debtor’s additional monthly payment of $934 shall be due on or
before the first business day of each month. In the event of a
default in any payment due to Aquesta hereunder by either Lessee or
Debtor, Aquesta may give written notice to Debtor and Rogers of
such default, which notice shall be provided via electronic mail.
Such notice shall be deemed received when sent via electronic mail
properly addressed to the address previously provided to Aquesta.
Debtor and Rogers bear the risk of any failure of delivery or
receipt if such electronic mail is properly addressed and sent. If
Debtor does not cure any default within thirty (30) days of Aquesta
sending such written notice of default, the automatic stay shall
immediately terminate without further notice or order of the
Bankruptcy Court to permit Aquesta to exercise its rights against
the Real Properties under its loan documents and non-bankruptcy law
in the Full Claim Amount.  Prior to payment in full of the amounts
owed to Aquesta hereunder, absent prior written approval from
Aquesta or order of the Bankruptcy Court, Debtor shall not (a)
lease any portion of the Real Properties to any insider; (b) extend
the terms of any leases for more than 12 months; and (c) enter into
any agreement to reduce the rental payments due under any existing
leases; provided, however, Debtor may continue to lease a
materially similar amount of space to Webworks 89, Inc., without
reduction in rent and without consent of Aquesta or order of the
Bankruptcy Court.  In the event that Debtor fails to sell the Real
Properties or refinance the outstanding obligation owed to Aquesta
in an amount sufficient to satisfy the Release Payment in full
during the Refinance/Sale Period, the automatic stay shall
immediately terminate without further notice or order of the
Bankruptcy Court with respect to the Real Properties to permit
Aquesta to exercise its rights against the Real Properties under
its loan documents and applicable non-bankruptcy law in the Full
Claim Amount.  Approval of this Plan Treatment by the Bankruptcy
Court shall constitute and effectuate a release by Debtor,
Debtor’s bankruptcy estate, Rogers, CFWebmasters.com, Webworks,
and any of their affiliates of Aquesta, its officers, directors,
employees, agents, and attorneys of any and all claims arising
prior to such approval, including but not limited to any claims
under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 1691 et
seq., and, Regulation B, 12 C.F.R. Section 202.1 et seq., and
Debtor and Rogers shall dismiss Adversary Proceeding No.
19-00070-5-SWH, with prejudice on the Effective Date.

Charles Ray Rogers, III and Webworks89, Inc. shall each execute a
confession of judgment, jointly and severally in the Full Claim
Amount, which Confessions of Judgment shall be provided to counsel
for Aquesta on the Effective Date and filed only on the
modification or termination of the automatic stay in the Bankruptcy
Case under the terms of this agreement. Aquesta agrees to forbear
from executing on the Confessions of Judgment pending liquidation
of the Real Properties, and shall credit the Confessions of
Judgment with the proceeds of any liquidation of collateral. Upon
receipt by Aquesta of the fully executed Confessions of Judgment as
contemplated herein, Aquesta shall dismiss with prejudice its
complaint in the case styled Aquesta Bank v. R&C Properties of
Wilmington, LLC and Charles Raymond Rogers, III, pending in the
North Carolina General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division,
New Hanover County, Case No. 18 CvS 4278.  During the Refinance /
Sale Period (and provided no default exists under the terms of this
Plan), Aquesta consents to Debtor's continued use of cash
collateral on terms and budget amounts substantially similar to
those previously agreed and set forth in the Interim Consent Order
Authorizing Debtor's Use of Cash Collateral and corresponding
budget, through confirmation of Debtor's plan of reorganization.
Post-confirmation and during the Refinance/Sale Period: (a) Debtor
shall not pay more than $1,400.00 per month toward professional
fees unless such payment comes from sources that would not have
constituted cash collateral if such amount were held or received by
Debtor prior to confirmation; and (b) Debtor shall not pay any
funds to Rogers, insiders, affiliates, or toward obligations that
are not obligations of the Debtor without prior written consent of
Aquesta or order of the Bankruptcy Court. Aquesta shall be entitled
to credit bid on any proposed sale of the Real Properties and
Aquesta shall have no obligation to pay any brokerage fee in
connection with such credit bid to the extent such fee would be
payable to an insider or affiliate of the Debtor or Rogers.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 19, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y2plt74d from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                     About R & C Properties

Based in Wilmington, North Carolina, R & C Properties of
Wilmington, LLC, owner of buildings and land at 5006 Randall
Parkway, and 4951 University Drive, filed a voluntary Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 18-05996) on December 14, 2018,
and is represented by Richard P. Cook, Esq., at Richard P. Cook,
PLLC, in Wilmington, North Carolina.

At the time of filing, the Debtor had estimated assets and debts of
$1 million to $10 million.


RANGE RESOURCES: S&P Cuts ICR to 'BB' on Weak Natural Gas Prices
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating and its
unsecured issue-level ratings on Range Resources Corp. to 'BB' from
'BB+'.

"The negative outlook reflects our expectation that the company's
credit measures will be weak through 2020 due to low gas and NGL
prices," the rating agency said.

The downgrade takes into account worse-than-expected financial
measures due to the decline in Henry Hub natural gas prices, the
recent decrease to S&P's gas price assumptions, and low natural gas
liquids (NGL) prices. Furthermore, Range Resources Corp. (Range)
has moderate hedges in place covering about 45% of its expected gas
production in 2020 and no hedges for 2021, leaving it exposed to
market prices. S&P projects that Range will have modest production
growth of around 5% over the next few years and that it will be
free cash flow neutral in 2020 and free cash flow positive
thereafter, which the rating agency views favorably. However, the
company has sizable debt maturities in 2021 and 2022, and commodity
and capital market conditions will likely result in refinancing on
less favorable terms. This is partially mitigated by ample low-cost
bank liquidity and potential future asset sales.

S&P's negative ratings outlook on Range reflects its expectation
that the company's credit measures will be weak for the rating
through 2020 with only modest support from the current hedging
schedule. The rating agency projects FFO to debt near 20%, and debt
to EBITDA in the 3.5-4x range.

"We could lower the rating if the company's credit measures were to
weaken such that FFO to debt were to fall below 20%, and debt to
EBITDA were to exceed 4.0x for a sustained basis. This could occur
if natural gas prices drop, regional differentials worsen beyond
our expectations, Range significantly outspends its cash flow, or
operating cost escalate substantially," S&P said.

"An upgrade over the next year is unlikely given our commodity
price assumptions. We could consider a positive rating action if
Range's leverage measures improve such that FFO to total debt
approached 30% and debt to EBITDA declined closer to 3x on a
sustained basis," S&P said, adding that this would most likely
occur if the company began generating meaningful positive free
operating cash flow due to improved profitability, greater capital
efficiency, or higher than assumed natural gas prices.


REAGOR-DYKES: Ford Motor Credit Still Has Issues With Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
At an Aug. 29, 2019 hearing conducted by Judge Robert L. Jones in
Lubbock, Texas, creditor Ford Motor Credit Company said it was not
ready to settle with debtor Reagor-Dykes Auto Group, KLBK
reported.

Ford Motor Credit attorney Don Cram said even though FMCC was happy
that RDAG was making progress, there were still deficiencies in a
reorganization plan RDAG filed.  Mr. Cram said FMCC "was unsure
what the debtors were asking the court to approve."

Attorneys for RDAG said they were willing to "re-file" their
reorganization plan.  Judge Jones said he will be ready to review
it sometime next week.

In an Aug. 15, 2019 filing, Ford said that the First Amended
Modified Disclosure Statement for the Second Amended Plan of
Reorganization still has deficiencies and is describing a plan
that's confirmable.  Issues it raised include:

  * The Debtors attach a balance sheet that shows $68,000 in assets
(cash).  This is inconsistent with the assets set forth in the
Debtors' liquidation analysis which sets forth assets of
approximately $3 million.

  * The reorganization alternative contemplates a "Plan Sponsor"
contributing up to $14 million to the proposed Reorganized Debtors.
The Debtors have now identified Henry Resources and SLJ Corp. as
significant investors in the Plan Sponsor.  However, there is no
explanation of who these entities are, their experience in the
automotive industry and more importantly, their ability to fund the
Plan under the reorganization alternative.

   * In the context of the liquidation alternative, the Second
Amended Plan contemplates that creditors will release all claims
against the Debtors.   This is tantamount to a discharge which is
unavailable to Debtors in a liquidation (or in a Chapter 7
proceeding).

   * It appears on its face that the Plan may violate the absolute
priority rule.  Although the Disclosure Statement indicates the an
equity holder is contributing "new value," there is no analysis or
discussion of what that new value consists of or its sufficiency to
escape the rule.

Attorneys for Ford Credit:

     Duane M. Geck, Esq.
     Donald H. Cram, Esq.
     SEVERSON & WERSON
     A Professional Corporation
     One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
     San Francisco, CA 94111
     Telephone: (415) 398-3344
     Facsimile: (415) 956-0439
     Email: dhc@severson.com

        -- and --

     Keith A. Langley, Esq.
     Brandon K. Bains, Esq.
     LANGLEY LLP
     1301 Solana Blvd
     Building 1, Suite 1545
     Westlake, TX 76262
     Telephone: 214.722.7171
     Facsimile: 214.722.7161
     Email: bbains@l-llp.com

                  About Reagor-Dykes Motors

Dykes Auto Group -- https://www.reagordykesautogroup.com/ -- is a
dealer of automobiles headquartered in Lubbock, Texas.  The Company
offers new and used vehicles, automobile parts, and other related
accessories, as well as car financing, leasing, repair, and
maintenance services. Some of its new vehicles include brands like
Ford, Toyota, GMC, Cadillac, Chevrolet and Buick.

Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP, based in Lubbock, TX, and its
debtor-affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex.
Lead Case No. 18-50214) on Aug. 1, 2018.  In its petition, the
Debtors estimated $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities. The petition was signed by Bart Reagor, managing
member of Reagor Auto Mall I, LLC, general manager and Rick Dykes,
managing member of Reagor Auto Mall I, LLC, general partner.

The Hon. Robert L. Jones oversees the case.

Mullin Hoard & Brown, L.L.P., led by David R. Langston, Esq., is
serving as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.  BlackBriar Advisors
LLC personnel is serving as CRO for the Debtor.


REALTY CAPITAL: Sept. 19 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------------
The Court has set a hearing to consider approval of the Disclosure
Statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan of Realty Capital
Ventures, LLC, for September 19, 2019 at 10:30 a.m., in United
States Bankruptcy Court, 1515 North Flagler Drive, Courtroom B, 8th
Floor, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401.  The last day for filing and
serving objections to the Disclosure Statement is September 12,
2019.

Class 1 secured claim of Patch. The Debtor objected to this Claim.
Patch failed to respond to the Objection and on July 25, 2019, the
Court entered an Order striking the claim.  Patch filed an amended
claim which is procedurally improper and failed to file a Motion
for reconsideration of the Order striking its claim. It is Debtor's
position that the striking of Patch's claim has the effect of
invalidating any underlying lien that Patch may have had and
therefore, Patch no longer has standing to participate in a
distribution under the Plan.

Class 2 allowed general unsecured claims. Debtor proposes to pay
the holders of Class 2 claims twenty-five (25%) percent of the
allowed amount of their claims within ninety (90) days of the
effective date.

Class 3 equity security holders and/or insiders of the Debtor.
Insiders shall subordinate to the claims of other creditors.

The Plan will be funded by Debtor's principal, ROGER RALSTON. No
outside sources are contemplated at this time.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 21, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/yytaljps from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorney for Debtor:

     Jordan L. Rappaport, Esq.
     RAPPAPORT OSBORNE & RAPPAPORT, PLLC
     1300 North Federal Highway
     Squires Building, Suite 203
     Boca Raton, Florida 33432
     Telephone (561) 368-2200
     Email: office@rorlawfirm.com

              About Realty Capital Ventures LLC

Realty Capital Ventures, LLC filed as a Florida limited liability
in Florida on Aug. 3, 2010, according to public records filed with
Florida Department of State.  Its principal assets are located at
1101 Grand Bahama Lane Singer Island, Florida.

Realty Capital Ventures sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-10932) on January 23,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  

The case has been assigned to Judge Erik P. Kimball.  The Debtor
tapped Rappaport Osborne & Rappaport, PLLC as its legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.


REIHNER ENTERPRISES: Unsecured Creditors to Get 25% Over 5 Years
----------------------------------------------------------------
Reihner Enterprises, Inc., filed a joint Chapter 11 plan and
accompanying disclosure statement.

The Class Four General Unsecured Claims are impaired and will be
paid at the rate of 25% over five years as shown in Debtor's
projections.

Funds Debtor generates from the sale of its assets which are placed
in a special account to be issued solely for distribution to
creditors and which shall be in an amount sufficient to satisfy the
distributions required under the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Joint Disclosure Statement dated August 21,
2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y38kzaaw from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                  About Reihner Enterprises

Reihner Enterprises, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No. 18-16436) on Oct.
25, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets
of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge
Arthur I. Harris presides over the case.  The Debtor tapped Forbes
Law LLC as its legal counsel.


RESOLUTE FOREST: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms 'BB-' ICR
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on Resolute Forest Products
Inc. to stable from positive and affirmed all of its ratings on the
company, including its 'BB-' long-term issuer credit rating on the
company.

The outlook revision reflects weaker-than-expected credit measures,
led primarily by lower earnings and cash flow, according to S&P.

Lumber prices have deteriorated significantly over the past year,
as a result of wet weather conditions that have affected U.S.
housing activity and increased inventories, and led to
lower-than-expected earnings and cash flow this year. S&P also
expects cash flows from pulp to be lower relative to 2018 as the
industry faces headwinds from the U.S.-China trade war. In
addition, net pension and postemployment obligations account for
about 50% of S&P's adjusted debt for Resolute and, following the
U.S. tax rate change (21% relative to the previous 35%), S&P's
tax-adjusted amount for the net deficit has increased by US$175
million resulting in about a 0.5x increase in leverage. Based on
the above factors, the rating agency now expects leverage to
increase to about 5x in 2019 relative to its previous expectation
of the low-3x area. In its view, leverage at this level is not
commensurate with a higher rating.

Newsprint prices are facing headwinds--not only from the structural
decline in demand, but also from weaker market conditions in India,
which recently imposed 10% tariffs on newsprint imports. Although
Resolute exports only a small proportion of its volumes to India,
S&P believes newsprint prices are likely to face pricing pressure.
Accordingly, S&P has lowered its 2019 and 2020 estimates for
newsprint. This is partially offset by the stronger-than-expected
operating performance in the specialty paper segment, where prices
have held relatively strong.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's view that gradual recovery in
U.S. housing starts should improve lumber prices. At the same time,
S&P believes pulp prices are unlikely to deteriorate further mainly
given its expectation for a gradual increase in demand and lack of
meaningful capacity coming online in the near term. Based primarily
on its price estimates, S&P expects Resolute's leverage to improve
to 4x in 2020, which is commensurate with its current rating on the
company.

"We could downgrade the company if we expect adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA to increase and remain above 5x in 2020 or if EBITDA
interest coverage approaches 2x. This could occur from
deterioration in realized prices that, combined with tariffs, lead
to earnings and cash flow materially below our expectations. We
could also downgrade Resolute if our assessment of its liquidity
weakens to an extent that no longer supports the current one-notch
uplift on the rating," S&P said.

"We could upgrade the company if we believe Resolute can generate
and sustain adjusted debt-to-EBITDA in the low-3x area. In this
scenario, all else being equal, we would expect lumber prices to
improve by 15% relative to current prices in 2020," S&P said. An
upgrade would also require a demonstrated improvement in the
company's profitability and product mix with more favorable
long-term demand fundamentals relative to papers, according to the
rating agency.


REWALK ROBOTICS: Incurs $4.6 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
---------------------------------------------------------------
ReWalk Robotics Ltd. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $4.58 million on $877,000 of revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2019, compared to a net loss of $5.79 million on $1.77
million of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2018.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company reported a net
loss of $8.58 million on $2.45 million of revenues compared to a
net loss of $12.12 million on $3.34 million of revenues for the
same period last year.

Gross margin was 50% during the second quarter of 2019, compared to
43% in the second quarter of 2018.  The increase was primarily
attributable to higher average selling price due to a change in
sales mix of the Company's ReWalk Personal device.

Total operating expenses in the second quarter of 2019 decreased to
$4.7 million, compared to $6.0 million in the prior year period.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $31.97 million in total
assets, $14.70 million in total liabilities, and $17.26 million in
total shareholders' equity.

As of June 30, 2019, ReWalk had $24 million in cash on its balance
sheet and $7.9 million in short- and long-term debt.

"The second quarter included several milestone achievements
relating to the ReStore exo-suit, the first soft wearable robotic
system for stroke patients, including FDA & CE clearances,
successful production, initiation of sales activities and delivery
of the first system for stroke patients.  Broadening the foundation
of the company with commercialization of a unique and disruptive
technology into a second and much larger market has been a key
strategic objective of the company over the past three years and
will be the basis for our future growth in revenues," said Larry
Jasinski, chief executive officer of ReWalk.  "Our ReWalk spinal
cord injury product had an uneven sales pattern this quarter, with
many of the expected Q2 sales deferred into July.  Importantly,
with the second quarter fundraising and continued expense
management, we have strengthened our balance sheet and have helped
to establish a financial runway where we will work to demonstrate
the potential and growth of our market changing products."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                       https://is.gd/uVT7ME

                       About ReWalk Robotics

ReWalk Robotics Ltd. -- http://www.rewalk.com/-- develops,
manufactures, and markets wearable robotic exoskeletons for
individuals with lower limb disabilities as a result of spinal cord
injury or stroke.  ReWalk's mission is to fundamentally change the
quality of life for individuals with lower limb disability through
the creation and development of market leading robotic
technologies.  Founded in 2001, ReWalk has headquarters in the
U.S., Israel and Germany.

ReWalk incurred a net loss of $21.67 million in 2018, a net loss of
$24.71 million in 2017, and a net loss of $32.50 million in 2016.
As of March 31, 2019, the Company had $17.03 million in total
assets, $14.98 million in total liabilities, and $2.05 million in
total shareholders' equity.

Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, a member of Ernst & Young Global, in
Haifa, Israel, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated Feb. 8, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has
stated that substantial doubt exists about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


REYNOLDS DEVELOPMENT: Seeks to Hire Wolfe Snowden as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Reynolds Development Company, LLC seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska to employ Wolfe
Snowden Hurd Ahl Sitzmann Tannehill & Hahn, LLP as its legal
counsel.

Reynolds requires Wolfe to:

     a. examine claims, particularly priority of claims, and to
institute the necessary proceedings and objections and the amounts
due, and also, conduct various negotiations necessary to effect any
adjustments as the amounts fie but the terms and time for payment
of claims;

    b. represent the Debtor in Possession in all legal matters
arising during the continuation of business and the control of
assets;

    c. defend and prosecute all motions, proceedings and actions
initiated by and against the Debtor in Possession and prosecute and
defend all suits involving the Debtor's estate.

Wolfe Snowden will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates. The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Wolfe does not hold any interest adverse to the Debtor and its
bankruptcy estate, according to court filings.

Wolfe Snowden can be reached at:

     John C. Hahn, Esq., Esq.
     Wolfe Snowden Hurd Ahl Sitzmann Tannehill & Hahn, LLP
     1248 O St., Suite 800
     Lincoln, NE 68508
     Tel: (402) 474-1507
     Email: bankruptcy@wolfesnowden.com

                 About Reynolds Development

Reynolds Development Company, LLC filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D. Neb. Case No. 18-41099) on July 6, 2018, listing under
$1 million in both assets and liabilities. The Debtor is
represented by John C. Hahn, Esq. from Wolfe, Snowden, Hurd, Luers
& Ahl, LLP.


RONEXPRESS INC: Seeks to Hire A+ Accounting and Tax as Accountant
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ronexpress, Inc. seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Middle District of Florida to employ A+ Accounting and Tax.

The professional services the firm will render are:

     a. prepare and file tax returns and conduct tax research
including contacting the Internal Revenue Service;

     b. perform normal accounting and other accounting services as
required by the Debtor; and

     c. prepare or assist the Debtor in preparing court-ordered
reports, including the United States Trustee reports and any other
documents necessary for the Debtor's disclosure statement.

The firm will be compensated as follows:
     
     a. A $3,000 initial retainer to be billed against at:

        i. an hourly rate of $175 for services rendered by the
Accountant;

       ii. a range of $100 - $50 per hour for services rendered by
accounting staff; and

      iii. reimbursement of out of pocket costs such as computer
charges, copies and postage for the accounting services.

A+ does not hold or represent any interests adverse to the Debtor
or its estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Akshay Dave
     A+ Accounting and Tax
     P.O. Box 372
     Brandon, FL 33509-0372
     Tel: (813) 381-3809
     Email: tax4002@gmail.com

                  About Ronexpress

RonExpress, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-04815) on May 22, 2019, disclosing under $1
million in both assets and liabilities. The Debtor is represented
by Buddy D. Ford, Esq., at Buddy D. Ford, P.A.


SACRAMENTO COUNTY HOUSING: S&P Cuts 2000B Rev. Bond Rating to 'BB-'
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term rating on Sacramento
County Housing Authority, Calif.'s multifamily housing revenue
bonds, series 2000B (Cottage Estates Apartments) to 'BB-' from
'BB'. The outlook is stable.

"The downgrade reflects debt service coverage falling below 1x at
maturity, which is currently in 2024. We project at this time that
assets and revenues will be insufficient to pay principal and
interest through maturity," said S&P credit analyst Vikas Jhaveri.

The rating reflects S&P's view of:

-- Projected insufficiency in revenues from mortgage debt service
payments and investment earnings to pay full and timely debt
service on the bonds through maturity; and

-- Projected decline in debt service coverage (DSC) to below
investment-grade levels at bond maturity, and a projected decline
in asset-liability parity to below 100% in 2024.

In S&P's view, the preceding credit weaknesses are partly mitigated
by:

-- The very strong credit quality of the Fannie Mae collateral
agreement, which is 'AA+' eligible under S&P's criteria;

-- Current asset-liability parity of 100.62%; and

-- Investments held in a First American Treasury Obligations Fund
Class D money market fund rated 'AAAm'.

The stable outlook is based on current estimated parity, which is
expected to remain above 100.25% over the next two years, and DSC
above 1x.

If DSC rises above 1x, S&P could raise the rating.

If DSC declines or parity falls faster than expected, S&P could
change the outlook to negative or lower the rating.



SANCHEZ ENERGY: Sept. 9 Common Stock Transfer Hearing Set
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas will
hold a final hearing on Sept. 9, 2019, at 2:30 p.m. (Prevailing
Central Time) to approve procedures for certain transfers of
beneficial ownership and declaration worthlessness with respect to
common stock of Sanchez Energy Corporation and its
debtor-affiliates.  Objections to the approval, if any, must be
filed on Sept. 3, 2019, at 4:00 p.m. (Prevailing Central Time).

                    About Sanchez Energy

Headquartered in Houston, Texas, Sanchez Energy Corporation --
http://www.sanchezenergycorp.com/-- is an independent exploration  
and production company focused on the acquisition and development
of oil and natural gas resources in the onshore United States.  The
Company is currently focused on the horizontal development of
significant resource potential from the Eagle Ford Shale in South
Texas, and it also holds other producing properties and undeveloped
acreage, including in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale in Mississippi
and Louisiana which offers potential future development
opportunities.

The Company and its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection on
Aug. 11, 2019 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 19-34508).

Marty L. Brimmage, Jr., Esq., Lacy M. Lawrence, Esq., Ira S.
Dizengoff, Esq., Jason P. Rubin, Esq., and Naomi Moss, Esq., at
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, represent the Debtors in their
bankruptcy cases.  The Debtors select Prime Clerk LLC as their
notice and claims agent.

The Company reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders
of $3.46 million in 2018, following a net loss attributable to
common stockholders of $35.05 million in 2017.  As of March 31,
2019, Sanchez Energy had $3.04 billion in total assets, $3.06
billion in total liabilities, $472.36 million in mezzanine equity,
and a total stockholders' deficit of $487.28 million.


SANCHEZ ENERGY: U.S. Trustee Forms 7-Member Committee
-----------------------------------------------------
Henry Hobbs Jr., acting U.S. trustee for Region 7, on Aug. 26
appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of Sanchez Energy
Corporation and its affiliates.

The committee members are:

     (1) Delaware Trust Company      
         Attn: Michelle Dreyer      
         251 Little Falls Drive      
         Wilmington, DE 19808     
         Tel: 302-636-5806      
         Fax: 302-636-8666      
         Email: michelle.dreyer@cscglobal.com

         Counsel: Arent Fox LLP
         Andrew I. Silfen, Esq.
         Jordana L. Renert, Esq.
         1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42
         New York, NY 10019
         Tel: 212-484-3900
         Fax: 212-484-3990
         Email: andrew.silfen@arentfox.com                         
                 
                jordana.renert@arentfox.com

     (2) Allstate Investments, LLC      
         Attn: Paul S. Caruso, Sr. Managing Counsel      
         444 West Lake Street, Suite 4500      
         Chicago, IL  60606      
         Tel: 312-764-6750      
         Email: paul.caruso@allstate.com       

     (3) Danos, LLC      
         Attn: Khanh Labat      
         3878 West Main Street      
         Gray, LA  70359      
         Tel: 985-219-3399      
         Email: khanh.labat@danos.com

         Counsel: Jones Walker LLP
         Mark A. Mintz, Esq.
         201 St. Charles Ave., Suite 5100
         New Orleans, LA 70170
         Tel: 504-582-8368
         Fax: 504-589-8368
         Email: mmintz@joneswalker.com

     (4) Rusco Operating, LLC      
         Attn: Olivia Howe      
         111 Congress, 9th Floor      
         Austin, TX  78701      
         Tel: 512-501-5452      
         Email:  olivia.howe@rigup.com

         Counsel: Brown Fox PLLC
         Eric C. Wood, Esq.
         8111 Preston Rd., Suite 300
         Dallas, TX  75225
         Tel: 214-327-5000
         Fax: 214-327-5001
         Email: eric@brownfoxlaw.com

     (5) Monarch Silica, LLC      
         Attn: Chase Neal      
         6606 FM 1488, Suite 148      
         Box 519 Magnolia, TX 77354      
         Tel: 281-889-9279      
         Email: cneal@monarchsilica.com  

         Counsel: Kilmer Crosby & Quadros PLLC
         Brian A. Kilmer, Esq.
         712 Main Street, Suite 1100
         Houston, TX 77002
         Tel: 713-300-9662
         Fax: 214-731-3117
         Email: bkilmer@kcq-lawfirm.com  

     (6) Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc.      
         Attn: Lyndell M. Scott      
         515 W. Greens Road               
         Houston, TX 77067      
         Tel: 281-775-8255      
         Fax: 281-775-8433      
         Email: lyndell.scott@nabors.com  

         Counsel: Snow Spence Green LLP
         Kenneth Green, Esq.
         2929 Allen Parkway, Suite 2800
         Houston, TX 77019
         Tel: 713-335-4830
         Fax: 713-335-4848
         Email: kgreen@snowspencelaw.com

     (7) McKinsey Recovery & Transformation      
         Services U.S., LLC      
         Attn: Claudio Brasca      
         555 California Street, Suite 4800      
         San Francisco, CA 94104      
         Tel: 415-318-5433      
         Email: claudio_brasca@mckinsey.com  

         Counsel: McKinsey & Company, Inc.
         Justin Sommers, Associate General Counsel
         55 East 52nd Street, 27th Floor
         New York, NY 10022
         Tel: 212-415-1922
         Email: justin_sommers@mckinsey.com
  
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                    About Sanchez Energy Corp.

Sanchez Energy Corporation and its affiliates --
https://sanchezenergycorp.com -- are independent exploration and
production companies focused on the acquisition and development of
U.S. onshore oil and natural gas resources.  Sanchez Energy is
currently focused on the development of significant resource
potential from the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, and holds other
producing properties and undeveloped acreage, including in the
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale (TMS) in Mississippi and Louisiana.  

As of Dec. 31, 2018, the companies had approximately 325,000 net
acres of oil and natural gas properties with proved reserves of
approximately 380 million barrels of oil equivalent and interests
in approximately 2,400 gross producing wells.

Sanchez Energy and 10 affiliates sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Lead Case No. 19-34508)
on Aug. 11, 2019.  As of June 30, 2019, the companies disclosed
$2,159,915,332 in assets and $2,854,673,930 in liabilities.  

The cases have been assigned to Judge Marvin Isgur.

The companies tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and Jackson
Walker L.L.P. as bankruptcy counsel; Moelis & Company LLC as
financial advisor; Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC as
restructuring advisor; and Prime Clerk LLC as notice and claims
agent.


SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms BB ICR
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed all of its ratings on U.S.-based The
Scotts Miracle-Gro Co., including its 'BB' issuer credit rating and
'B+' senior unsecured notes rating, and revised the outlook to
stable from negative. The recovery rating on the notes remains '6',
indicating that creditors could expect negligible (0%-10%; rounded
estimate: 0%) recovery in the event of a payment default, according
to the rating agency.

Confidence builds after Scotts mitigated several headwinds in 2019.
Scotts improved credit ratios by successfully navigating meaningful
cost inflation, stabilizing and subsequently increasing
profitability at its hydroponics segment following a large
acquisition and adverse regulatory changes in California, and
reporting positive results in the nonselective weed killer category
despite unfavorable media coverage about the Roundup herbicide
litigation and the product's owner, Monsanto Co. S&P expects fiscal
2020 adjusted leverage around the mid-3x area and free cash flow
(FCF) over $300 million.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that Scotts will
maintain moderate momentum in the core U.S. consumer business
(subject to fair weather conditions), continue to invest in the
higher-growth hydroponics sector, and increase shareholder returns
in 2020 while managing adjusted leverage around the mid-3x area. It
expects FCF to improve significantly in 2020 to over $300 million
due to steady performance and the absence of outflows that
depressed 2019 cash flow.

"We could lower the rating if we project year-end leverage will
increase on a sustained basis to over 4x. This could result if
operating performance deteriorates meaningfully potentially due to
input cost volatility, escalating competition, customer losses, or
extreme weather conditions in the U.S. during the company's peak
season," S&P said, adding that a downgrade could also occur if
financial policy becomes much more aggressive than the rating
agency expects, if there are unfavorable developments related to
the Roundup brand, or renewed regulatory disruptions in the
cannabis sector.

"Although unlikely over the next year, we could raise the rating if
we believe Scotts will moderate its financial policies such that
year-end adjusted leverage will fall below 3x on a sustained basis.
This could result if Scotts achieves our forecast by increasing
core U.S. consumer EBITDA by 1% annually and Hawthorne Gardening
Co. subsidiary sales by over 20% annually, while limiting
shareholder returns to around $250 million annually," S&P said,
adding that this would result in little debt growth and
deleveraging primarily through organic EBITDA expansion.


SHALE SUPPORT: Sept. 18 Disclosure Statement Hearing
----------------------------------------------------
Shale Support Global Holdings, LLC, Shale Support Holdings, LLC,
Stanton Rail Yard, LLC, Southton Rail Yard, LLC, Drying Facility
Assets Holding, LLC, Shale Energy Support, LLC, Mine Assets
Holding, LLC, and Wet Mine Assets Holding, LLC, and BSP Agency,
LLC, in its capacity as administrative agent for the Term Loan
Lenders under that certain Term Loan Agreement, filed a joint
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization and accompanying disclosure
statement.

A hearing to consider approval of the Disclosure Statement and
relief requested in the Disclosure Statement Motion will commence
on September 18, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., prevailing Central Time.
September 17, 2019, at 4:00 p.m., prevailing Central Time, is the
amended date by which responses and objections, if any, to approval
of the Disclosure Statement.

Class 6 General Unsecured Claims are impaired. Each holder of an
Allowed Class 6 Claim shall receive its Pro Rata share of the GUC
Recovery applicable to the Sub-Class for such Allowed Class 6
Claim, which distributions shall be made in accordance with Article
VI.F of the Plan.

Class 4 Secured Term Loan Claims are impaired. Each holder of an
Allowed Secured Term Loan Claim shall receive its Pro Rata share of
the Secured Term Loan Claim Recovery (including the New Membership
Interests and a principal portion of the Exit Facility).

Class 5 Unsecured Convenience Class Claims are impaired. Each
holder of an Allowed Class 5 Claim shall receive its Pro Rata share
of the Convenience Class Recovery Pool.

Class 7 Intercompany Claims. Class 7 Claims shall either be
Reinstated or cancelled and released without any distribution.

Class 8 Interests in the Subsidiary Debtors. Class 8 Interests
shall either be Reinstated or cancelled and released without any
distribution.

Class 9 Interests in SSGH, SSH, MAH and Stanton are impaired. Class
9 Interests shall be cancelled, released and extinguished as of the
Effective Date, and each of SSGH, Stanton, and MAH shall be
dissolved.

Class 10 Subordinated Claims are impaired. Allowed Subordinated
Claims, if any, shall be discharged, canceled, released, and
extinguished as of the Effective Date, and will be of no further
force or effect, and Holders of Allowed Subordinated Claims will
not receive any distribution of account of such Allowed
Subordinated Claims.

The Plan will be funded by the following sources of consideration:
(a) Cash on hand, including proceeds of the DIP Facility; (b) the
New Membership Interests; (c) the Cudd Litigation Proceeds; and (d)
the proceeds from the Exit Facility, as applicable.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 19, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/yxjp8ang from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Counsel to the Debtors:

     Shari L. Heyen, Esq.
     Karl Burrer, Esq.
     David R. Eastlake, Esq.
     1000 Louisiana St., Suite 1700
     Houston, Texas 77002
     Tel: (713) 374-3500
     Fax: (713) 374-3505
     Email: HeyenS@gtlaw.com
            Burrerk@gtlaw.com
            EastlakeD@gtlaw.com

                     About Shale Support

Shale Support Global Holdings, LLC -- https://shalesupport.com/ --
is a privately owned, vertically integrated proppant supplier to
the exploration and production sector of the oil and gas industry.
Their proppants are comprised of monocrystalline sand (i.e., "frac
sand") designed to keep an induced hydraulic fracture open to
enhance oil and gas product recovery in unconventional shale
deposits.

On July 11, 2019, Shale Support Global Holdings, LLC, and seven
affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
19-33884).

Shale Support Global disclosed total assets of $3,150,225 and
$127,899,025 as of May 31, 2019.

The Hon. David R. Jones is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Greenberg Traurig, LLP, as counsel; Alvarez &
Marsal as financial advisor; Piper Jaffray & Co. as investment
banker; and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., as claims agent.

The U.S Trustee on July 29, 2019, appointed five creditors to serve
on an official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11
cases.  The Committee has retained Foley Gardere, Foley & Lardner
LLC as its legal counsel and GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group,
LLC as its financial advisors.


SKY-SKAN INC: Coastal Capital, DoL Object to Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Coastal Capital, LLC, and the U.S. Department of Labor filed
separate objections to Sky-Skan Incorporated's Disclosure Statement
Pertaining to its Plan of Reorganization.

According to Coastal, a debtor's disclosure statement must include,
among other things, information concerning the "anticipated future
of the debtor, with accompanying financial projections," as well as
information about "[t]he condition and performance of the debtor
while in chapter 11."  Coastal asserts that the Debtor disclose its
past business operations as part of the disclosure statement, there
is no discussion of the licensing and sales relationship between it
and SSE prior to the execution of the Licensing Agreement on June
20, 2019.  Coastal complains that the July Disclosure Statement
does not indicate how much, if anything, by way of dividend
payments Debtor, as majority shareholder in SSE, has received since
it was founded in 2000.  Coastal points out that the basis for the
offset is not provided in the July Disclosure Statement.

According to Coastal, given that Glenn Smith, the holder of a
forty-nine (49) percent interest in SSE appears to be taking draws,
and SSE has retained earnings of EUR1,946,239.61 and assets of over
EUR2.6 million as of yearend, 2018, it is difficult to understand
how the value of SSE can be so low that a fifty-one (51) percent
interest is only worth $565,271.00.
Coastal asserts that the Debtor states that there is a low risk of
plan failure because it has "generally projected it cash collateral
budget accurately . . ." Coastal disagrees with this
characterization.  Coastal complains that there does not appear to
be any historical performance that supports the projections upon
which the that Debtor now relies.

The DoL objects on the grounds that the Disclosure Statement and
the Plan contain ambiguous language regarding Class 8 Department of
Labor Claims, which seems to (1) subject the claim to conditional
and varying treatment depending on the treatment of Class 2
Contingent Coast Capital, LLC's claim, and (2) potentially
substitute equity distributions rather than cash distributions,
which run afoul the 401(k) retirement plan at issue.  The
Secretary, therefore, lacks sufficient information to make an
informed judgment in reference to the proposed Disclosure
Statement.

Attorney for Coastal:

     Ryan D. Sullivan, Esq.
     Curran Antonelli, LLP
     100 Summer Street
     Suite 1600
     Boston, MA 02110
     Phone: (617) 207-8670
     Facsimile: (857) 263-5215
     Email: rsullivan@curranantonelli.com

                     About Sky-Skan Inc.

Sky-Skan, Inc., was founded in 1967 as a company dedicated solely
to the development and manufacture of specialized devices for
depicting dynamic visualizations of astronomical and meteorological
phenomena on planetarium domes in museums, schools, and
universities. The company has since grown to become a provider of
digital full dome science visualization, theater control, and show
programming systems for hundreds of planetariums on six continents,
serving hundreds of clients in the niche field of immersive science
interpretation and education.  From the initial planning stage to
staff training and ongoing support, Sky-Skan provides all services
required by the most advanced digital full-dome planetariums and
visualization theaters.

Sky-Skan, based in Nashua, NH, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D.N.H. Case No. 17-11540) on Nov. 1, 2017.  In the petition signed
by Steven T. Savage, president, the Debtor estimated $0 to $50,000
in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.   

Peter N. Tamposi, Esq., at The Tamposi Law Group, P.C., serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor, and SquareTail Advisors, LLC, is
the financial advisor.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Dec. 1, 2017.  The Committee retained
William S. Gannon PLLC as its bankruptcy counsel.


SKYFUEL INC: Committee Hires Kutner Brinen as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Skyfuel, Inc.
seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Colorado to retain Kutner Brinen, P.C. as its legal counsel.

The firm will provide these services in connection with Skyfuel's
Chapter 11 case:

     a. provide the committee with legal advice with respect to its
powers and duties under the Bankruptcy Code;

     b. conduct factual inquiries into matters on behalf of the
committee relating to the Debtor's assets, liabilities, and
financial condition;

     c. file the necessary petitions, pleadings, reports and
actions which may be required in the continued administration of
the estate;

     d. assist the committee in determining the proper course of
the case and issues that arise during the case including potential
sale of assets and the formulation of plan of reorganization; and

     e. perform all other legal services for the committee which
may be necessary.

The firm's standard hourly rates are:

     Lee Kutner          $550
     Jeffrey Brinen      $475
     Jenny Fujii         $380
     Keri Riley          $320
     Maureen Gerardo     $200
     Paralegal            $75

Keri Riley, Esq., at Kutner Brinen, disclosed in a court filing
that the firm is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Keri L. Riley, Esq.
     Kutner Brinen, P.C.
     1660 Lincoln St., Suite 1850
     Denver, CO 80264
     Phone: (303) 832-2400
     Telecopy: (303) 832-1510
     Email: klr@kutnerlaw.com

              About Skyfuel Inc.

Founded in 2007, Skyfuel, Inc. -- http://www.skyfuel.com/--
designs, manufactures and deploys complete solar field solutions
featuring the SkyTrough and SkyTroughDSP parabolic trough
concentrating solar collectors. SkyFuel is the solar thermal
technology arm of the Sunshine Kaidi New Energy Group Co., Ltd.
(Kaidi), a multi-billion dollar energy company based in Wuhan,
China.

An involuntary Chapter 11 petition for relief against SkyFuel, Inc.
(Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 19-12400) was filed on March 29, 2019.
The court entered an order for relief on April 23, 2019.  The
Debtor is represented by Akerman LLP.


SNEED SHIPBUILDING: Ch. 11 Trustee Files Plan of Liquidation
------------------------------------------------------------
Allison D. Byman, solely in her capacity as the Chapter 11 Trustee
of the Bankruptcy Estate of Sneed Shipbuilding, Inc., filed a
Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation and accompanying Disclosure
Statement.

Class 3 - General Unsecured Claims are impaired. Class 3 General
Unsecured Claims are paid in full and there exists remaining
Available Cash, holders of Allowed Claims in such class shall
receive interest at the Plan Rate. According to its Schedules, the
Debtor estimates its potential liability for Class 3 Claims to be
approximately $16,691,835.53. As of the date of this Disclosure
Statement, the claims register in the Debtor's Case reflects proofs
of claim classified as "unsecured" in an aggregate amount of
approximately $8,522,689.27.

Class 4 - Equity Interests are impaired. Class 4 Equity Interests
are impaired. All equity interests in the Debtor shall be canceled
on the Effective Date and holders of such Equity Interests shall
receive no Distribution under the Plan.

The Chapter 11 Trustee believes in her business judgment that the
Plan is feasible as the sale of substantially all the Debtor’s
assets has closed and funded and the appeal of the sale has now
been resolved by final order.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 19, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y6zwjcmo from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorneys for the Chapter 11 Trustee:

     Steven D. Shurn, Esq.
     Alexander Perez, Esq.
     HUGHES WATTERS ASKANASE, L.L.P.
     1201 Louisiana St., 28th Floor
     Houston, Texas 77002
     Telephone: (713) 759-0818
     Facsimile: (713) 759-6834
     Email: sshurn@hwallp.com
            aperez@hwallp.com

                    About Sneed Shipbuilding

Sneed Shipbuilding, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 16-60014) on March 4,
2016.  The petition was signed by Clyde E. Sneed, president.  The
Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and debt of
$10 million to $50 million.

The case is assigned to Judge David R. Jones.  

The Debtor was represented by Amber Michelle Chambers, Esq., Eric
Michael VanHorn, Esq., and Nicholas Zugaro, Esq., at McCathern,
PLLC.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed five creditors of Sneed
Shipbuilding to serve on an official committee of unsecured
creditors.

On Nov. 3, 2016, the court appointed Allison D. Byman as the
Chapter 11 trustee.  The Trustee is represented by Hughes Watters
Askanase, LLP.


SOVRANO LLC: Equity Bank, Franchisees Object to Plan Disclosures
----------------------------------------------------------------
Equity Bank filed a limited objection and reservation of rights to
the approval of the disclosure statement explaining Sovrano, LLC,
et al.'s joint plan of reorganization.

Equity Bank said the Debtors have not yet paid about $28.7 million
of prepetition secured loans.  Equity Bank said it is engaging in
good faith negotiations with the Debtors and believes they are
close to reaching an agreement on the terms of a consensual plan.
However, out of an abundance of caution, Equity Bank files this
limited objection to put the Debtors on notice that the Joint Plan
does not currently provide for the treatment of Equity Bank’s
superpriority administrative expense claim and as a result, the
Joint Plan would not be confirmable as currently drafted.
Moreover, Equity Bank asserted that the Disclosure Statement should
reflect that the Debtors may seek to sell or refinance some, all,
or substantially all of its assets at any point in time.

Certain franchisees, including 614 Cupcakes, LLC, and Three Dough
Boys, LLC, complain that the Disclosure Statement does not contain
financial information detailing the pre- or postpetition
performance of any of the Debtors.  Though the Plan contemplates
the continued operations of the Gatti's related debtors, there are
no projections to determine whether the reorganized operations of
Gatti's will be followed by liquidation or further financial
restructuring.

MGUC, LLC, MG Valley, LTD, MG Harlingen Way, LTD, and MG Paseo
Real, LTD, complained that the disclosure statement does not
provide adequate information regarding several matters that a
hypothetical reasonable investor would need to make an informed
judgment about the plan.  MGUC asserted that the Disclosure
Statement does not contain financial projections and the basis for
the financial projections for the reorganized Debtors.

According to MGUC, the Debtors should provide information on how
the Debtors plan to resolve the approximate $28,000,000 secured
indebtedness by the December 31, 2020 due date.  MGUC complains
that the Debtors failed to properly use funds paid to Mr. Gatti's
LP for the media fund and marketing development fund for the
purposes provided under the franchise agreements.

A hearing was held Aug. 27, 2019, and objections were resolved by
agreement announced on record.  The MGUC Parties subsequently
withdrew their objection.  The Disclosure Statement was approved,
as modified.

Counsel for Equity Bank:

     Toby L. Gerber, Esq.
     John N. Schwartz, Esq.
     NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP
     2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 3600
     Dallas, TX 75201-7932
     Tel: (214) 855-8000
     Fax: (214) 855-8200

        -- and --

     Edward J. Nazar, Esq.
     W. Thomas Gilman, Esq.
     HINKLE LAW FIRM LLC
     1617 North Waterfront Parkway, Suite 400
     Wichita, KS 67206-6639
     Telephone: (316) 267-2000
     Facsimile: (316) 264-1518

Attorneys for the Franchisees:

     Jeffrey Cohen, Esq.
     Anthony Garcia, Esq.
     COHEN, LLC
     1600 Broadway, Suite 1660
     Denver, CO 80202
     Tel: (303) 524-3636
     Email: jcohen@cohentrial.com
            agarcia@cohentrial.com

Attorney for the MGUC Parties:

     William H. Daniel, Esq.
     McGinnis Lochridge LLP
     600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2100
     Austin, Texas 78701
     (512) 495-6016; (512) 505-6316 (Fax)  
     Email: wdaniel@mcginnislaw.com

About Sovrano LLC

Sovrano, LLC is a private equity group specializing in lower
middle-market investments. Based in Fort Worth, Texas, the company
invests in the food services or restaurant industry.  In 2015,
Sovrano acquired Gatti's Pizza, a pizza chain founded in 1969.

Sovrano and its subsidiaries filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. N.D. Tex., Lead Case No. 19-40067) on Jan. 4, 2019.  The
Hon. Edward L. Morris is assigned to the cases.  In the petitions
signed by Kyle C. Mann, vice chairman, Sovrano estimated assets of
between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities of between $10
million and $50 million.

The Debtors tapped Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel.


SRC ENERGY: S&P Puts 'B' ICR on Watch Positive on PDC Energy Deal
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed its ratings on SRC Energy Inc., including
its 'B' issuer credit rating and 'B+' senior unsecured issue-level
rating, on CreditWatch with positive implications.

On Aug. 26, 2019, Denver-based crude oil and natural gas
exploration and production (E&P) companies PDC Energy and SRC
Energy announced a definitive merger agreement, under which PDC
will acquire SRC in an all-stock transaction.

"The CreditWatch placement reflects the likelihood that we will
raise our ratings on SRC Energy after the close of its acquisition
by higher-rated PDC Energy. We will likely view SRC as core to PDC
given the strategic fit of the assets and the likelihood that PDC
will either repay or assume SRC's outstanding debt," S&P said.

The all-stock transaction is valued at approximately $1.7 billion
and SRC shareholders will receive 0.158 shares of PDC common equity
for each SRC share held. Each company's board of directors has
approved the transaction, which remains subject to regulatory and
shareholder approvals.

The CreditWatch positive placement reflects the likelihood that S&P
will raise the ratings on SRC Energy when the deal closes, assuming
the transaction is completed as proposed and there are no material
changes to the rating agency's current operating assumptions.


SYNCREON AUTOMOTIVE: Gets Canadian Recognition of UK Proceedings
----------------------------------------------------------------
On Aug. 8, 2019, pursuant to the application of Carine Van
Landschoot, in its capacity as foreign representative of syncreon
Group B.V. and syncreon Automotive (UK) Ltd. ("Scheme Companies"),
an order ("Initial Recognition Order") was granted by the Ontario
Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List), granting relief
available to a foreign representative in any proceedings commenced
in Canada under Part IV of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act
(the "CCAA").  The Initial Recognition Order, among other things:

    a) ordered and declared that the Foreign Representative is a
"foreign representative" in respect of the English Proceedings, as
such terms is defined in subsection 45(1) of the CCAA;

    b) recognized the English Proceedings as "foreign non-main
proceedings", as defined in subsection 45(1) of the CCAA;

    c) recognized and gave full force and effect to the Convening
Order in all the provinces and territories of Canada;

    d) authorized the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. as
information officer (in such capacity, the "Information Officer" )
and defined the powers and responsibilities of the Information
Officer; and

e) dispensed with the notice requirement under subsection 53(b) of
the CCAA for the Foreign Representative to publish a notice,
containing the prescribed information, in one of more newspapers in
Canada.

At a hearing on July 25, 2019, the English Court made an order
("Convening Order"), which, among other things, authorized the
convening of the Scheme Meetings to consider the Schemes, which
meetings are scheduled to be held on Sept. 3, 2019.

On July  22, 2019, the Companies applied to the High Court of
Justice of England and Wales seeking an order authorizing the
commencement of scheme of arrangement proceedings with respect to
the Scheme Companies and the convening of meetings ("Scheme
Meetings") of certain of their creditors, for the purpose of
considering, and if thought fit, approving with or without
modification, the proposed schemes of arrangement in relation to
each of the Scheme Companies under Part 26 of the U.K. Companies
Act 2006 (as amended) ("English Proceedings").  

A hearing to consider the relief requested in the Verified Petition
for 9:15 a.m. (Prevailing Eastern Time) on Sept. 17, 2019, before
the Hon. Brendan Shannon in Courtroom #2 of the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, 824 North Market
Street, 6th Floor, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.  Objections to the
verified petition, if any, are due no later than 4:00 p.m.
(Prevailing Eastern Time) on Aug. 19, 2019.

A copy of the application, the Information Officer's Pre-filing
Report and the Initial Recognition Order is available at
https://www.pwc.com/ca/en/services/insolvency-assignments/syncreon-group-b-v--and-syncreon-automotive--uk--ltd--.html

Scheme documents and materials filed in the English Proceedings can
be found at https://www.lucid-is.com/syncreon/

The Information Officer can be reached at:

       PRICEwATERHOUSECOOPERS INC.
       18 York Street, Suite 2600 Toronto, Ontario M5J 0B2

       Michelle Pickett
       Tel: 416-815-5002
       E-mail: michelle.pickett@pwc.com

       Davian Durant
       E-mail: davian.r.durant@pwc.com

       Tammy Muradova
       E-mail: tammy.muradova@pwc.com

Lawyers for the Information Officer:

       FASKEN MARTINEAU DUMOULIN LLP
       333 Bay Street
       Suite 2400
       Bay Adelaide Centre
       Toronto, ON M5H 2T6

       Stuart Brotman
       Tel: 416-865-5419
       E-mail: sbrotman@fasken.com

       Dylan Chochla
       Tel: 416-868-3425
       Fax: 416-364-7813
       E-mail: dchochla@fasken.com

Global restructuring counsel for the Syncreon Group:

       WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
       767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153
   
       WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES (London) LLP
       110 Fetter Lane
       London, EC4A 1AY, United Kingdom

       Matt Barr
       Tel: 212-310-8010
       E-mail matt.barr@weil.com

       Andrew Wilkinson
       Tel: +44 20 7903 1068
       E-mail: andrew.wilkinson@weil.com

       Andriana Georgallas
       Tel: 212-310-8827
       E-mail: andriana.georgallas@weil.com

       Alinta Kemeny
       Tel: +44 20 7903 1369
       E-mail: alinta.kemeny@weil.com

       Rosalind Meehan
       Tel: +44 20 7903 1146
       E-mail: rosalind.meehan@weil.com

       Katherine Lewis
       Tel: 212-310-8486
       E-mail: katherine.lewis@weil.com

US counsel to syncreon Global Holdings Limited:

       SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
       425 Lexington Avenue
       New York, NY 10017

       Sandy Qusba
       Tel: 212-455-3760
       E-mail: SQusba@stblaw.com

       Edward R. Linden
       Tel : 212-455-2781
       E-mail: Edward.Linden@stblaw.com

       Chase Bentley
       Tel : 212-455-2309
       E-mail: chase.bentley@stblaw.com

Lawyers for the Foreign Representative:

       BLAKE CASSELS & GRAYDON LLP
       199 Bay Street
       Suite 4000, Commerce Court West Toronto, ON M5L 1A9

       Linc Rogers
       Tel: 416-863-4168
       E-mail: linc.rogers@blakes.com

       Aryo Shalviri
       Tel: 416-863-2962
       E-mail: aryo.shalviri@blakes.com

       Caitlin McIntyre
       Tel: 416-863-4174
       Fax: 416-863-2653
       E-mail: caitlin.mcintyre@blakes.com

                   About Syncreon Automotive

Based in England, Syncreon Automotive (UK) Ltd. --
http://www.syncreon.com/-- is a specialized contract logistics
company that manages supply chain synergies for global premier
automotive and technology brands.  The Company handles, processes,
and manages the inbound and outbound flow of automotive
components.

The Companies filed for Chapter 15 protection (Bankr. Del. Case No.
19-11702) on July 30, 2019 to seek U.S. recognition of proceedings
in the U.K.  Laura Davis Jones, Esq., of Pachulski Stang Ziehl &
Jones LLP, serves as U.S. counsel.


TAMARA HOME: Seeks to Hire Batista Law as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Tamara Home Care Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Puerto Rico to hire The Batista Law Group,
P.S.C. as legal counsel in connection with its Chapter 11 case.  

Batista Law Group will be paid at these hourly rates:

    Jesus E. Batista Sanchez, Esq.      $250
    Associates                          $200
    Paralegals                          $100

The firm will also be reimbursed for work-related expenses
incurred.

Jesus Batista Sanchez, Esq., a principal of Batista Law Group,
disclosed in court filings that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estate.

Batista Law Group may be reached at:

     Jesus E. Batista Sanchez, Esq.
     Batista Law Group, PSC
     20 Ave. Munoz Rivera, Suite 901
     San Juan, PR 00918
     Telephone: 787-620-2856
     Fax: 787-777-1589

                      About Tamara Home Care Inc.

Founded in 2010, Tamara Home Care Inc. is a privately-held company
that provides home health care services.  It is a small business
debtor as defined in 11 U.S.C. section 101(51D).

Tamara Home filed under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
D.P.R. Case No. 19-04539) on August 9, 2019, listing under $1
million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Brian K. Tester presides over the case.  Jesus Enrique
Batista Sanchez, Esq. at The Batista Law Group, P.S.C., is the
Debtor's legal counsel.


TENDERLEAF VILLAGE: Nov. 6 Plan Confirmation Hearing
----------------------------------------------------
The disclosure statement filed by Tenderleaf Village, Inc., is
conditionally approved.

October 23, 2019, is fixed as the last day for filing written
acceptances or rejections of the plan.  October 23, 2019, is fixed
as the last day for filing and serving written objections to the
disclosure statement and confirmation of the plan.

November 6, 2019, is fixed for the hearing on final approval of the
disclosure statement (if a written objection has been timely filed)
and for the hearing on confirmation of the plan. The hearing shall
be held at 11:00 a.m. at the United States Courthouse, 515 Rusk
St., Courtroom 403, Houston, Texas.

Class 6 - Unsecured Claims over $100.00 are impaired. These claims
shall be paid in pro-rata monthly installments over 24 months,
beginning on the first day of the first full month after the
effective date of the plan until paid in full. The Debtor reserves
the right to pre-pay these claims if the business and real property
sell prior to the expiration of 24 months. The estimated payment to
this class is $973.14 per month.

Class 3A - Secured Claim of Ron Rose are impaired. Class 3A consist
of the secured claim of Ron Rose in the amount of $1,462,071.34
with interest at the rate of 10%. This claim is secured by a first
lien on the Property. The Debtor shall continue paying adequate
protection payments in the amount of $5,000.00 per month until the
business and Property are sold, at which time this claim shall be
paid in full.

Class 3B - Disputed Secured Claims of Zoe Realty Investment GP, LLC
are impaired. Class 3B consists of the disputed secured claim of
Zoe Realty Investment GP, LLC in the alleged amount of $556,395.11
with interest at the rate of 10%. This claim was listed as disputed
on the Debtor's schedules. Zoe did not file a proof of claim and
therefore will take nothing under this Plan. Upon the effective
date of the Plan, Zoe shall execute a release of lien in a form
promulgated by the Debtor.

Class 4 - Priority Claim of the Internal Revenue Service are
impaired. Class 4 consists of the priority claim of the Internal
Revenue Service in the amount of $5,000.00. This claim was filed as
an estimated claim. The Debtor does not have any W-2 employees, it
only employs contract labor. If the Debtor cannot reach an
agreement whereby the IRS withdraws its claim, the Debtor will file
an objection to the claim. The IRS shall take nothing under the
Plan.

Class 5 - Unsecured Claims under $100.00 are impaired. Class 5
consists of the unsecured claims under $100.00. There is one claim
in this class for a total of $89.69. This claim shall be paid in
full on the first full month of the first fill quarter following
the effective date of the Plan.

Class 7 - Equity Security Holders are impaired. Class 7 consists of
the equity security holder of the Debtor, James Tran. Mr. Tran will
retain his interest in the Reorganized Debtor. Mr. Tran will not
receive any dividends unless and until all creditors are paid in
full pursuant to this plan.

The Plan of Reorganization proposes the sale of the Debtor's
business and Property utilizing the profits to fund the plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 21, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/yx8v35xm from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorneys for the Debtor:

     Julie M. Koenig, Esq.
     COOPER & SCULLY, PC.
     815 Walker, Suite 1040
     Houston, Texas 77002
     713/236-6800 (Telephone)
     713/236-6880 (Telecopier)
     Email: Julie.Koenig@cooperscully.com

                   About Tenderleaf Village

Tenderleaf Village owns two business properties in Lufkin, Texas,
with a total current value of $2.7 million.  The company is a
tax-exempt entity (as described in 26 U.S.C. Section 501).

Tenderleaf Village filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-31061) on Feb. 28, 2019.  In the petition
signed by James Tran, director, the Debtor disclosed $2,833,076 in
assets and $1,923,273 in liabilities.

The case is assigned to the Hon. Jeffrey P. Norman.  Julie Mitchell
Koenig, Esq., at Cooper & Scully, PC, is the Debtor's legal
counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case.


U.S. PIPE: Ct. Rules in Favor of Trustees in Coal Act Claims
------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned United States Pipe and Foundry Company, LLC,
Plaintiff, v. Michael H. Holland, Michael McKown, Joseph R.
Reschini, and Carlo Tarley, as Trustees of the United Mine Workers
of America 1992 Benefit Plan, et al., Defendants, Adv. No.
8:17-ap-00478-MGW (Bankr. M.D. Fla.), Bankruptcy Judge Michael G.
Williamson enters a judgment finding in favor of the Trustees, as a
matter of law, that their Coal Act claims were not discharged in
U.S. Pipe's earlier bankruptcy case and that the Trustees didn't
violate the discharge injunction by suing U.S. Pipe under the Coal
Act.

Under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992, coal
mine operators are required to (among other things) pay premiums to
two retirement funds to pay for health benefits for certain retired
coal miners. Related persons--those who shared certain common
ownership with coal operators as of July 1992--are jointly and
severally liable for premiums due under the Coal Act.

Two years ago, United States Pipe and Foundry Company, which
previously shared common ownership with a coal operator, was sued
for unpaid Coal Act premiums as a "related person." U.S. Pipe,
however, contends that any joint and several liability it had under
the Coal Act was discharged in U.S. Pipe's chapter 11 bankruptcy
case nearly 30 years ago. In rejecting this contention, the Court
concludes that because Coal Act premiums are in the nature of a
tax, any premiums that came due after the effective date of U.S.
Pipe's confirmed plan were not discharged in U.S. Pipe's earlier
bankruptcy case.

The Court might be inclined to agree with U.S. Pipe if the Court
were writing on a clean slate. But it is not. Numerous courts have
used the Lorber test (or some variation of it) to determine whether
a fee is a "constitutional" tax in a variety of bankruptcy contexts
(as opposed to a "tax" for Anti-Injunction Act purposes). The Court
is not aware of any reason why the Lorber test wouldn't apply
here.

Nor is the Court aware of--and U.S. Pipe has not cited--any federal
court decision that has considered whether Coal Act premiums are
taxes under the Lorber test and concluded that they are not.
Because the Coal Act premiums are an involuntary pecuniary burden
imposed by Congress for a public purpose under its taxing power,
the Court reaches the same conclusion that every Circuit Court of
Appeal that has considered the issue has: The Coal Act premiums are
taxes. And because they are taxes assessed on a periodic basis
(either annually or monthly), each period gives rise to a new
liability.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated March 29, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2MDzhdw from Leagle.com.

Stephanie C. Lieb, Esq. , Trenam, Kemker, Scharf, Barkin, Frye,
O'Neill & Mullis, P.A., Counsel for Defendants.

Scott A. Stichter, Esq. , Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler,
Counsel for Plaintiff.

                  About United States Pipe

United States Pipe & Foundry Company, LLC, was previously a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Walter Industries, Inc., now known as
Walter Energy, Inc. Debtor manufactured ductile iron pipe for
industries and municipalities. Its plant in Birmingham, Alabama,
was constructed in 1910; manufacturing began around 1911; and
operations ceased around 2010. The plant was ultimately dismantled
in 2012 after the surrounding area was designated as a Superfund
site.

United States Pipe, its parent, and affiliated companies filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 in this Court on
December 27, 1989.  The Debtor and its affiliates filed an Amended
Joint Plan of Reorganization, dated as of December 9, 1994.  The
Plan was confirmed by an order entered on March 2, 1995.


UNIQUE TOOL: Seeks to Hire Maynard Industries as Auctioneer
-----------------------------------------------------------
Unique Tool & Manufacturing Co. seeks authority from the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio (Toledo)
to hire Jeff Miller of Maynard Industries as its auctioneer.

The Debtor intends to sell its equipment and machinery by an
auction and file a motion with the court to approve such a sale.

Maynard Industries will be compensated for its services as follows:


     a. Expense budget of $20,000 to cover out-of-pocket auction
expenses. Expense budget to be deducted from the gross sale
proceeds; and

     b. 18 percent buyers' premium to all auction buyers.

The firm is disinterested within the meaning of Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached at:

     Jeff Miller
     Maynards Industries Ltd
     21700 Northwestern Hwy, Suite 1180
     Southfield, MI 48075-4923
     Tel. 248-569-9781
     Fax. 248-569-9793
     Email: JMiller@maynards.com

         About Unique Tool

Unique Tool & Manufacturing Co. -- http://www.uniquetool.com/-- is
a custom metal stamping company formed in 1963, which supplies
stampings to the satellite, communications, electrical, appliance,
refrigeration and automotive industries throughout the United
States, Canada and Mexico.  It specializes in tool and die
manufacturing, brazing, welding, plating and more.  

Unique Tool & Manufacturing sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
N.D. Ohio Case No. 19-32356) on July 26, 2019, .  At the time of
the filing, the Debtor estimated up to $50,000 in assets and $1
million to $10 million in liabilities.

The Hon. Mary Ann Whipple is the case judge.  Diller and Rice, LLC
is the Debtor's legal counsel.  


UNITED AIRLINES: Fitch Affirms BB IDR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Issuer Default Rating for United
Airlines Holdings, Inc. and its airline operating subsidiary,
United Airlines, Inc. at 'BB'. The Rating Outlook is Stable.

The rating affirmation reflects generally positive trends at United
including the company's solid operational and financial performance
relative to peers over the past year. Operating margins and credit
metrics trends have improved in 2019 owing to United's ongoing
strategic initiatives, a strong demand environment and manageable
fuel costs. Fitch forecasts that credit metrics will remain roughly
stable over the next 2-3 years barring an unexpected economic
downturn.

Fitch calculates United's total adjusted debt/EBITDAR at 3.0x as of
June 30, 2019. Fitch's expectations for medium term adjusted
leverage metrics in the low 3x range, EBITDAR margins sustained in
the upper teens, and prospects for positive FCF are strong for the
'BB' rating. The rating could move higher if United continues along
the trend that it has set over the past two years. Near-term
concerns include the possibility of a weaker macroeconomic
environment along with other risks that are typical of the airline
industry.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Operating Margin Improvement: Fitch expects to see modest operating
margin expansion in 2019. Improvement reflects several factors
including positive impacts of United's build-out of its
mid-continent hubs, a solid demand environment, cost control, and
relatively stable fuel prices. Better margin performance is
supportive of a more positive general trajectory that has taken
shape at United over the past two years as unit revenue and
operating performance have improved compared to peers, labor
relations have improved and the company has more consistently met
or exceeded its earnings targets. Fitch's base forecast includes
margin expansion of roughly 100 bps in 2019 followed by flattish
margins in the next two years based on conservative assumptions
around the demand environment. United's EBIT margins have expanded
in each of the past three quarters. Fitch calculates United's LTM
EBIT margin at 10%, which remains lower than Delta's 15.1% but
higher than American's 7.6% margin. Until recently United had
underperformed American on an EBIT basis since 2013.

Solid Credit Metrics for the Rating: Fitch calculates United's
total adjusted debt/EBITDAR at 3x as of June 30, 2019, which Fitch
considers to be supportive for the rating. Fitch expects leverage
metrics to remain roughly flat over the forecast horizon. Debt
balances may increase in 2020 as the company will likely tap debt
markets to fund a heavy year of aircraft deliveries. Higher debt
balances should be offset by stable margins and top line growth.
FFO fixed charge coverage is also solid for the rating at over 4x.
United maintains stronger metrics than American or Spirit,
competitors that are also rated in the 'BB' category. United's
leverage and profitability metrics remain modestly weaker than its
network competitor Delta, which Fitch rates 'BBB-'. United's weaker
leverage metrics are partially offset by its smaller pension
liabilities compared to Delta, which Fitch does not include in its
leverage calculation. Both leverage and coverage metrics improved
materially from a year ago, but part of the improvement is due to
changes in accounting standards around operating leases and to
Fitch's decision to use a 7x multiple to capitalize aircraft rent
compared to its previous 8x approach. Though these changes lead to
improved metrics, Fitch does not view them as fundamental changes
to the company's overall level of credit risk.

737 MAX Issues: Fitch does not expect the grounding of the 737 MAX
to be a ratings concern for United. However, the headwinds from the
grounding could become much more material if the aircraft aren't
returned to service by early 2020. There were 14 MAXs in United's
fleet at the time of the grounding, constituting a manageable
portion of United's fleet during the 2019 peak travel season.
United expected to take delivery of 16 more in the second half of
the year and another 28 in 2020, meaning that by YE 2020, the MAX
was scheduled to make up roughly 10% of United's mainline
narrowbody fleet. Should the grounding carry on through next
summer's peak travel season, operational and cost impacts would be
much more meaningful.

Fitch's base case expectation is that the MAX will return to
service early next year. The grounding will likely mean that United
will not have all of its planned MAX deliveries by YE 2020.
Nevertheless, Fitch expects that backlogged deliveries can occur
relatively quickly once the grounding is lifted because Boeing has
continued to produce aircraft. If the grounding is prolonged beyond
its expectation, Fitch believes that other positive factors for
United (solid demand, cost control efforts, solid liquidity, etc.),
will act as sufficient offsets such that the grounding will not
impact the ratings.

United Growing Faster than Peers: United articulated a strategic
initiative in early 2018 aimed at driving better profitability at
its mid-continent hubs through increased connectivity. United
rebanked its hubs in Chicago and Denver, increased flying to small
markets from its hubs, and upgauged flying in certain competitive
markets to mainline aircraft. Results to date have been positive,
as United has reported above industry average unit revenue growth,
three quarters of margin improvement, and solid growth in corporate
revenues. Fitch previously viewed the above average capacity growth
involved with United's initiative as a minor concern due to the
potential to drive weaker unit revenues and higher costs from
flying more regional jets. However, results over the last year have
largely alleviated these concerns.

Solid Non-Fuel Cost Performance: United's non-fuel cost trajectory
remains a positive factor for the credit. The company is
experiencing unexpected headwinds in 2019 from the MAX grounding,
the temporary suspension of flights to India due to the closure of
Pakistani airspace, and severe weather. Even including these
factors, United is forecasting that non-fuel costs will increase by
a relatively modest 0.5%-1% in 2019. Assuming that the MAX
grounding is lifted, United should see material benefits of having
a more meaningful cohort of highly fuel efficient planes in the
fleet for much of 2020. United is also focusing on managing
overhead expenses, increasing gate utilization, and upgauging
regional aircraft, which should translate into flat or declining
unit costs in 2020. United is currently in negotiations with its
pilot union, whose contract became amendable in February of 2019.
The outcome of those negotiations could pressure costs, but Fitch
is not expecting to see pay increases of the magnitude that were
included in United's previous round of negotiations.

Positive FCF: Fitch expects United to generate positive FCF over
its multi-year forecast period. The timing of the company's cash
flow is somewhat complicated by potential further delays in 737 MAX
deliveries. Despite this uncertainty, Fitch views United's
underlying cash generation potential as supportive of its financial
flexibility. Capital spending will be high in 2019 and 2020 due to
a large number of aircraft deliveries. Expensive widebody aircraft
deliveries spike in 2020 as United expects to take 15 787s and two
777-300ERs, in addition to a substantial number of narrowbodies.
Capital spending should decline beginning in 2021 as aircraft
deliveries become more modest. United continues to pursue used
aircraft purchases when possible, which Fitch views as a prudent
effort to trim capex and improve FCF. For instance the company
recently agreed to purchase 19 used 737-700s that will enter the
fleet by YE 2021.

FCF may largely be directed to shareholders over the next several
years. United's board of directors approved a new $3 billion share
repurchase program in the second quarter. This follows the $3
billion program that was authorized in early 2018. The company
still had $687 million available under its previous plan at June
30, 2019. Although share repurchases may be sizeable, Fitch doesn't
view them as a material risk at this time given the company's
relatively stable leverage metrics and the likelihood that
repurchases would be pulled back if cash flows were to weaken.

EETC Ratings: Overall, most of United's EETC transactions performed
in line with Fitch's prior expectations. Stress scenario
loan-to-value ratios for EETC transactions are driven by two
factors: the amortization of the certificates and changes in
collateral values, with the latter having the majority of the
impact. Over the past year, stress scenario LTVs improved in four
transactions (2019-1, 2014-1, 2014-2, and 2012-2) and worsened in
four transactions (2018-1, 2016-2, 2016-1 and 2013-1). In general
asset value performance was only modestly worse than its base
depreciation rates, meaning that transaction LTVs are fairly flat
with where they were a year ago.

The majority of top-down rated tranches continue passing Fitch's
'AA' and 'A' stresses with considerable cushion.

United's EETCs in aggregate are most exposed to the 777-300ER,
737-900ER, and 787 family of aircraft.

Values for 777-300ERs had been dropping materially in prior years
but performed better over the past year. 2016 and 2017 vintage 777
values declined by 5.6% and 6.3% respectively (per Fitch's
appraisals), which is modestly above its standard 5% depreciation
rate, but represents an improvement from value declines seen in
recent years. Modest value declines for the 777s factored into
relatively steady LTV ratios for the 2016-1, 2016-2 and 2018-1
transactions.

2013-2016 vintage 737-900ER values dropped by 6.4% on average over
the past year, which is above its standard rate of 5% but below the
three year average trend for the aircraft type. Six of United's
EETCs (2012-2 through 2016-2) have exposure to the -900ER. Value
declines for the 900ER contributed to modestly higher LTVs where
concentrations of those aircraft were higher, particularly in the
2014-1 and 2014-2 transactions.

United's 2012-2 through 2014-1 deals have exposure to the 787-8.
Value declines for 2012-2014 vintage 787-8s have been very modest
over the past year, averaging only 3.7%. Likewise, 787-9 values
have been quite steady over the past year, contributing to
relatively stable LTVs for the 2014-1 through 2018-1 transactions.

2014 and 2015 vintage E-175 values were weak over the past year,
declining by over 9%. Weaker values for the 175s weigh on United's
2014-1 and 2014-2 deals, but their impact is limited due to the
modest percentage that they make up of those collateral pools.

Even though recently observed depreciation curves are slightly
above Fitch's standard assumptions, they have not resulted in
negative rating actions as the amortization profile of the
transactions were able to absorb slightly higher depreciation.

Class B Certificate Ratings:

Fitch notches subordinated tranche EETC ratings from the airline
IDR based on three primary variables; 1) the affirmation factor
(0-2 notches for airlines with 'BB' category ratings), 2) the
presence of a liquidity facility, (0-1 notch) and 3) recovery
prospects (0-1 notch).

United's Class B certificates are rated at either 'BBB' or 'BBB+'
with the difference depending on levels of overcollateralization.
Fitch considers the affirmation factor (likelihood the aircraft
would be affirmed in bankruptcy) to be high for each of the
transactions. All transactions receive a one-notch uplift for the
presence of a liquidity facility.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

United's 'BB' rating is in between the ratings of its two major
network rivals, Delta Air Lines (BBB-) and American Airlines (BB-).
The ratings distinction between the three airlines is reflective of
the financial strategies adopted by each airline. For instance,
following its merger with Northwest Airlines, Delta aggressively
de-leveraged its balance sheet and now maintains a leverage ratio
of less than 2x, compared to 3x for United. American Airlines, on
the other hand, has adopted a more aggressive financial policy,
borrowing heavily to finance new aircraft deliveries while
simultaneously sending material amounts of cash to shareholders via
share repurchases. As such, American's debt levels have risen since
it exited bankruptcy and it now maintains an adjusted leverage
metric of just over 5x. United's ratings are in line with JetBlue.
JetBlue benefits from lower leverage metrics than United, offset by
its smaller size and geographic reach. Fitch also rates Spirit
Airlines 'BB'. Spirit's leverage metrics are weaker than United's,
but its credit profile is supported by its low cost structure and
high operating margins.

EETC Derivation:

The certificates rated 'AA' are in line with Fitch's ratings on
senior classes of EETCs issued by American, Spirit and Air Canada.
Fitch believes that these transactions compare well with recent
precedents. Stress scenario LTVs for 2019-1 and 2018-1 are
marginally higher than other certificates rated 'AA', though both
transactions retain adequate headroom within the 'AA' stress
scenario to support the rating. The collateral pool also compares
well with other transactions rated 'AA'. Stress scenario LTVs for
the 2016-1 and 2016-2 class 'AA' certificates are in-line with 'AA'
rated peers. Collateral pools for those two transactions are
marginally weaker than some peers due to their concentrations of
777-300ERs, but this risk is offset by United's underlying credit
strength and a high affirmation factor. Class A certificates that
are rated 'A' compare well with issuances from American, Air
Canada, and British Airways that are also rated 'A'. Rating
similarities are driven by similar levels of overcollateralization
and high quality pools of collateral. Fitch rates certain class A
certificates from American and Delta 'A-' or in the 'BBB' category
where levels of overcollateralization are weaker.

The 'BBB' or 'BBB+' ratings on the class B certificates are derived
through a three or four-notch uplift from United's IDR. Other class
B certificates issued by 'BB' category rated airlines generally
receive either three or four notches of ratings uplift, with the
difference in notching based on generally higher recovery prospects
in a 'BB' level stress scenario for the class B certificates that
receive four notches.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  - Continued modest global economic growth leading to stable
demand for air travel and supporting modest increases in unit
revenue/sustained load factors through 2021.

  - Capacity growth of 3.5% in 2019, 6% in 2020, and in the low
single digits in 2021.

  - Jet fuel prices averaging $2.15/gallon in 2019, increasing to
$2.25/gallon by 2021.

  - Unit costs remaining fairly flat through the forecast period.

  - 2019 capital spending in line with the company's public
guidance, followed by a spike in capex in 2020 due to higher
aircraft deliveries and more modest spending thereafter

  - Fitch assumes that aircraft deliveries are primarily funded
with debt

  - Share repurchases are sized in such a way that United maintains
a liquidity balance consistent with recent levels.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- Adjusted debt/EBITDAR trending towards 2.5x;

  -- FFO fixed charge sustained at or above 4x;

  -- Free cash flow as a percentage of revenue sustained in the
mid-single digits;

  -- Continued improvements in United's operational performance;

  -- Evidence of improving unit revenues.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- Adjusted debt/EBITDAR sustained above 3.5x;

  -- EBITDAR margins deteriorating into the low double digit
range;

  -- Persistently negative or negligible free cash flow .

EETC Sensitivities:

Ratings for the class AA and class A certificates are primarily
based on a top-down analysis based on the value of the collateral.
Therefore, a negative rating action could be driven by an
unexpected decline in collateral values. Fitch does not expect to
upgrade any of the AA or A certificates above their current ratings
in the near term.

The ratings of the subordinated tranches are influenced by Fitch's
view of United's corporate credit profile. If United's IDR were to
be upgraded to 'BB+' or downgraded to 'BB-' the class B
certificates rated at 'BBB' could be upgraded or downgraded
commensurately. Class B certificates rated at 'BBB+' would be
affirmed at 'BBB+' if United were upgraded to 'BB+' per Fitch's
EETC criteria. The class B ratings could be lowered due to a
material decline in Fitch's view of the affirmation factor these
transactions. Class B ratings are also influenced by Fitch's
recovery analysis. The class B certificates rated at 'BBB' could be
upgraded by one notch if recovery prospects improve over time.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Sufficient Liquidity: As of June 30, 2019, United maintained
approximately $7.4 billion in total liquidity including full
availability under its $2.0 billion revolver. Liquidity as a
percentage of LTM revenue was 17.5%, which Fitch considers adequate
for the ratings particularly given its expectations that UAL will
generate significant FCF over the next several years. The company
also maintains a sizeable and growing base of unencumbered assets
that can be tapped to raise funds if needed in the case of a
downturn.

Maturities of long-term debt and capital leases total $757 million
for the second half of 2019, $1.35 billion in 2020 and $1.34
billion in 2021. Fitch considers United's debt maturities to be
manageable given its current liquidity balance, expectations for
positive FCF over the forecast period and the flexibility afforded
by the company's share repurchase program.

United's debt structure primarily consists of secured debt backed
by aircraft including EETCs. The company also has a $1.5 billion
term loan that matures in 2024 and $2 billion revolver that matures
in 2022. The credit facility is secured by certain international
route authorities, slots and related assets. United also has four
series of unsecured notes with maturities between 2020 and 2025.
United Airlines Holdings is the issuer of the notes. They are fully
guaranteed by United Airlines, Inc.


VELMO USA: Seeks to Hire Kaplan Johnson as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Velmo USA, LLC seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Kentucky to hire Kaplan Johnson Abate &
Bird, LLP as its legal counsel.

The firm will provide these services in connection with the
Debtor's Chapter 11 case:

     a. advise the Debtor regarding its powers and duties in the
continued operations of the company's business and management of
estate assets;

     b. take all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
estate, including the prosecution of actions on behalf of the
Debtor, the defense of any actions commenced against the Debtor,
negotiations concerning all litigation in which the Debtor is
involved, if any, and objecting to claims filed against its
bankruptcy estate;

     c. prepare on behalf of the Debtor all necessary motions,
answers, orders, reports and other legal papers in connection with
the administration of its estate; and

     d. perform other legal services for the Debtor in connection
with the formulation and implementation of its Chapter 11 plan.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Charity Bird     Attorney      $350
     James McGhee     Attorney      $300
     Aimee Lilly      Paralegal      $95

Kaplan received a retainer in the sum of $25,000, which includes
payment of the filing fee.

Tyler Yeager, Esq., at Kaplan Johnson, disclosed in court filings
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as defined by Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Tyler R. Yeager, Esq.
     Chariity S. Bird, Esq.
     Kaplan Johnson Abate & Bird, LLP
     710 West Main Street, Fourth Floor
     Louisville KY 40202
     Telephone: 502-540-8285
     Facsimile: 502-540-8282
     Email: cbird@kaplanjohnsonlaw.com
            tyeager@kaplanjohnsonlaw.com

              About Velmo USA

Velmo USA, LLC is a global sourcing ISO 9001:2008 certified company
serving a diverse range of industries including automotive,
construction, chemical & food industries and more.  It offers hot
forged ring, castings, CNC machine parts, screw machine parts,
steel tubes, sheet metal fabrications, metal stamping parts and
forgings.  

Velmo USA filed a petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 19-32515) on Aug. 6, 2019.  The petition
was signed by J. Bradley Law, president.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of between $1 million and $10
million and liabilities of the same range.

Judge Alan C. Stout presides over the case.  Kaplan Johnson Abate &
Bird LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.


WAFTA PROPERTIES: Rental Payments to Fund Plan Distributions
------------------------------------------------------------
Wafta Properties LLC filed a Chapter 11 plan and accompanying
Disclosure Statement proposing that payments under the plan will be
funded by rental payments.  The Debtor has no general unsecured
creditors.  A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated
August 19, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y5bjoq97 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Based in Lodi, New Jersey, Wafta Properties LLC, a Single Asset
Real Estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)), is the fee
simple owner of a property located in Lodi, New Jersey having a
current value of $1 million, filed a voluntary Chapter 11 Petition
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-17709) on April 16, 2019.  The case is
assigned to Hon. Stacey L. Meisel.

The Debtor's counsel is Noah M. Burstein, Esq., in Teaneck, New
Jersey.

At the time of filing, the Debtor had estimated assets of $500,000
to $1 million and estimated liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.


WEATHERFORD INT'L: Ropes, Norton Update Official Committee
----------------------------------------------------------
In the Chapter 11 cases of Weatherford International PLC, et al.,
the law firms of Ropes & Gray LLP and Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
filed an amended report under Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure, to disclose an updated list of committee
members that they are representing.

As of August 22, 2019, the committee members and their disclosable
economic interests are:

(1) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee
    60 Wall Street
    24th Floor
    New York, NY 10005

    * $600,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by the
      Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2003, among Weatherford
      International Ltd., as issuer, Weatherford International,
      LLC and Weatherford International PLC, as guarantors, and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee,
      and the Officers' Certificate, dated as of August 7, 2006,
      pursuant to which Weatherford International Ltd. issued the
      6.50% Senior Notes due 2036.

    * $500,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by the 2003

      Indenture as supplemented by the First Supplemental
      Indenture, dated as of March 25, 2008, pursuant to which
      Weatherford International Ltd. issued the 7.00% Senior Notes

      due 2038.

    * $250,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by the 2003

      Indenture as supplemented by the Second Supplemental
      Indenture, dated as of January 8, 2009, pursuant to which
      Weatherford International Ltd. issued the 9.875% Senior
      Notes due 2039.

    * $800,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by the 2003

      Indenture as supplemented by the Fourth Supplemental
      Indenture, dated as of September 23, 2010, pursuant to which

      Weatherford International Ltd. issued 5.125% Senior Notes
      due 2020.

    * $600,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by the 2003

      Indenture as supplemented by the Fourth Supplemental
      Indenture, dated as of September 23, 2010, pursuant to which

      Weatherford International Ltd. issued 6.750% Senior Notes
      due 2040.

    * $750,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by the 2003

      Indenture as supplemented by the Fifth Supplemental
      Indenture, dated as of April 4, 2012, pursuant to which
      Weatherford International Ltd. issued 4.50% Senior Notes
      due 2022.
    * $550,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by the
      2003 Indenture as supplemented by the Fifth Supplemental
      Indenture, dated as of April 4, 2012, pursuant to which
      Weatherford International Ltd. issued 5.95% Senior Notes
      due 2042.

    * $1,265,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by the
      2003 Indenture as supplemented by the Ninth Supplemental
      Indenture, dated as of June 7, 2016, pursuant to which
      Weatherford International Ltd. issued the 5.875%
      Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2021.

    * $1,500,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by the
      2003 Indenture as supplemented by the Tenth Supplemental
      Indenture, dated as of June 17, 2016, pursuant to which
      Weatherford International Ltd. issued 7.75% Senior Notes
      due 2021 and 8.25% Senior Notes due 2023.

    * $790,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by the
      2003 Indenture as supplemented by the Eleventh Supplemental
      Indenture, dated as of November 18, 2016, pursuant to which
      Weatherford International Ltd. issued 9.875% Senior Notes
      due 2024.

    * $300,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by the
      Indenture, dated as of June 18, 2007, among Weatherford
      International, LLC, as issuer, Weatherford International
      Ltd. and Weatherford International PLC, as guarantors, and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee,
      as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture, dated
      as of June 18, 2007, pursuant to which Weatherford
      International, LLC issued 6.80% Senior Notes due 2037.

    * $600,000,000 original principal amount evidenced by the
      2007 Indenture as supplemented by the Sixth Supplemental
      Indenture, dated as of February 28, 2018, pursuant to which
      Weatherford International, LLC issued 9.875% Senior Notes
      due 2025.

    * In addition to the foregoing principal amounts, Deutsche
      Bank Trust Company Americas, in its capacity as indenture
      trustee, holds claims for the interests, fees, expenses and
      other liabilities accruing under and evidenced by each of
      the foregoing Indentures and the notes issued thereunder.

(2) Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd.
    200 Seaport Blvd. V13H
    Boston, MA 02210

    * Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. is the beneficial owner of

      $1,510,000 in principal amount of notes issued under
      (i) the Indenture, dated October 1, 2003, among Weatherford
      International Ltd., Weatherford International, Inc., and
      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, and
      (ii) the Indenture, dated June 18, 2007, among Weatherford
      International, LLC, Weatherford International Ltd.,
      Weatherford International PLC, and Deutsche Bank Trust
      Company Americas, as trustee

(3) Rapid Completions LLC
    120 Newport Center Drive
    Newport Beach, CA 92660

    * Rapid Completions LLC has a contingent and unliquidated
      claim

Proposed Counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
can be reached at:

         ROPES & GRAY LLP
         Mark R. Somerstein, Esq.
         Matthew M. Roose, Esq.
         1211 Avenue of the Americas
         New York, NY 10036-8704
         Telephone: (212) 596-9000
         Facsimile: (212) 596-9090
         E-mail: mark.somerstein@ropesgray.com
                 matthew.roose@ropesgray.com

                   - and -

         NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP
         Louis R. Strubeck, Jr., Esq.
         Jason L. Boland, Esq.
         2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 3600
         Dallas, TX 75201-7932
         Telephone: (214) 855-8000
         Facsimile: (214) 855-8200
         E-mail: louis.strubeck@nortonrosefulbright.com
                 jason.boland@nortonrosefulbright.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing is available at PacerMonitor.com at


    
http://bankrupt.com/misc/Weatherford_International_287_Rule2019.pdf
    
http://bankrupt.com/misc/Weatherford_International_Exhibit__287_Rule2019.pdf

                      About Weatherford

Weatherford (NYSE: WFT), an Irish public limited company and Swiss
tax resident -- http://www.weatherford.com/-- is a multinational
oilfield service company providing innovative solutions, technology
and services to the oil and gas industry. The Company operates in
over 80 countries and has a network of approximately 650 locations,
including manufacturing, service, research and development and
training facilities and employs approximately 26,000 people.

Weatherford reported a net loss attributable to the company of
$2.81 billion for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net
loss attributable to the company of $2.81 billion for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017.  

As of March 31, 2019, Weatherford had $6.51 billion in total
assets, $10.62 billion in total liabilities, and a total
shareholders' deficiency of $4.10 billion.

On July 1, 2019, Weatherford International plc, Weatherford
International, LLC, and Weatherford International Ltd. sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 19-33694).

The Hon. David R. Jones is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Latham & Watkins
LLP as counsel; Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC as financial
advisor; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC as investment banker; and Prime
Clerk LLC as claims agent.

Henry Hobbs Jr., acting U.S. trustee for Region 7, on July 17,
2019, appointed three creditors to serve on the official committee
of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases.


XTL INC: Seeks to Hire Gehling Osborn Law as Special Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
XTL, Inc. seeks authority from the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) to hire
Anthony Osborn and Gehling Osborn Law Firm PLC as special counsel.

Gehling Osborn Law will represent the Debtor in a legal malpractice
action against its former attorneys, Shawn McCann, Esq., and Edward
Noethe, Esq., of McGinn, Springer & Noethe, PLC.  The case
captioned XTL, Inc. v. McGinn, Springer & Noethe, PLC, et al, No.
1:19-cv-0013 is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of Iowa (Western Division).

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Anthony Osborn,  Partner  $275
     Emilee Gehling,  Partner  $275
     Associate                 $220
     Paralegal                 $110

Anthony Osborn, Esq., at Gehling Osborn, disclosed in court filings
that his firm is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Anthony Osborn, Esq.
     Gehling Osborn Law Firm PLC
     600 4th St Suite 900
     Sioux City, IA 51101
     Phone: +1 712-226-4600

               About XTL, Inc.

XTL, Inc. is a transportation & logistics company that provides
customized logistics solutions for warehousing and inventory
control of commodities and finished goods.

XTL, Inc. filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 19-14844) on August
1, 2019. In the petition signed by Louis J. Cerone, president, XTL,
Inc. estimated $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities.

Allen B. Dubroff, Esq. & Associates, LLC is the Debtor's legal
counsel.


YUMA ENERGY: Receives Second Notice of Noncompliance from NYSE
--------------------------------------------------------------
Yuma Energy, Inc. was notified by the NYSE American that the
Company is not in compliance with one of the Exchange's continued
listing standards as set forth in Part 10 of the NYSE American
Company Guide.

Specifically, Yuma is not in compliance with Section 1003(a)(ii) of
the Company Guide in that it reported shareholders' equity of $2.4
million on June 30, 2019, which is below the minimum standard of $4
million, and reported losses from continuing operations and/or net
losses in its five most recent fiscal years.  The Exchange also
warned that the Company may be close to falling below compliance
with Section 1003(a)(i) which requires minimum shareholder's equity
of $2 million.  As previously reported, on June 20, 2019, the
Company received notice from the Exchange the Company was not in
compliance with Section 1003(a)(iii) of the Company Guide having
reported a stockholders' equity of $5,998,045 as of March 31, 2019
and sustained continuing operations and/or net losses in its five
most recent fiscal years.  While these events require separate
notification and disclosure the remedy to resolve each is the same,
and the plan to regain compliance will address both events of
non-compliance.

The notice is based on a review by the Exchange of information that
the Company has publicly disclosed, including information contained
in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on Aug. 19, 2019 which included
the interim consolidated financial statements for the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2019.

In order to maintain its listing on the Exchange, the Company
submitted a plan of compliance on July 16, 2019 and intends to
supplement the plan to address how it intends to regain compliance
with the continued listing standards by Dec. 17, 2020.

The Exchange notification of continued listing deficiency does not
affect the Company's business operations or its SEC reporting
obligations.  Yuma's management previously recognized the need to
engage in financing transactions or other strategic alternatives to
address the Company's financial requirements, and the Company has
publicly announced those initiatives.  As previously disclosed,
Yuma is involved in restructuring discussions. Management continues
to work with Seaport Global Securities LLC, an investment banking
firm, to advise the Company on various strategic alternatives;
however, there is no assurance that any transaction or
restructuring alternatives will materialize.

Receipt of the notice does not have any immediate effect on the
listing of the Company's shares on the Exchange, except that until
the Company regains compliance with the Exchange's listing
standards, a ".BC" indicator will be affixed to the Company's
trading symbol.  The Company's business operations, SEC reporting
requirements and debt instruments are unaffected by the
notification, provided that if the Plan is not acceptable, or the
Company does not make sufficient progress under the Plan or
reestablish compliance by Dec. 17, 2020, then the Company will be
subject to the Exchange's delisting procedures.  The Company may
then appeal a staff determination to initiate such proceedings in
accordance with the Company Guide.

                        About Yuma Energy

Yuma Energy, Inc. -- http://www.yumaenergyinc.com/-- is an
independent Houston-based exploration and production company
focused on acquiring, developing and exploring for conventional and
unconventional oil and natural gas resources.  Historically, the
Company's activities have focused on inland and onshore properties,
primarily located in central and southern Louisiana and
southeastern Texas. Its common stock is listed on the NYSE American
under the trading symbol "YUMA."

Yuma Energy reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders
of $17.07 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a
net loss attributable to common stockholders of $6.80 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of June 30, 2019, the Company had
$63.54 million in total assets, $46.44 million in total current
liabilities, $14.69 million in total other noncurrent liabilities,
and $2.40 million in total
stockholders' equity.

Moss Adams LLP, in Houston, Texas, the Company's auditor since
2017, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 2, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company is in
default on its credit facility, has a substantial working capital
deficit, has no available capital to maintain or develop its
properties and all hedging agreements have been terminated by
counterparties.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


[^] BOOK REVIEW: Bendix-Martin Marietta Takeover War
----------------------------------------------------
MERGER: The Exclusive Inside Story of the Bendix-Martin Marietta
Takeover War

Author:  Peter F. Hartz
Publisher:  Beard Books
Soft cover: 418 pages
List Price: $34.95
Review by Gail Owens Hoelscher

William Agee, the youngest man ever to head one of the top 100
American corporations, seemed unstoppable. In 1977, at the age of
39, he took over Bendix Corporation, an aerospace, automotive, and
industrial firm, determined to diversify the company out of the
automotive industry.  In his words, "Automobile brakes are in the
winter of their life and so is the entire automobile industry."  He
sold off a few Bendix units, got some cash together, and began to
look for acquisitions.

Then Agee's relationship with Mary Cunningham burst into the news.
Agee had promoted Cunningham from his executive assistant to vice
president, to the outrage of other Bendix employees. Their affair,
replete with power, brains, youth, good looks, charm, denial, and
deceit, fascinated the American public. Cunningham was forced to
leave Bendix to work for Seagrams, with the entire country
wondering just how well she would do.  The two divorced their
respective spouses and married soon thereafter. To the chagrin of
many, Cunningham continued to play a pivotal role in Bendix
affairs.

Eager to regain his standing, Agee turned to acquisition as soon as
the gossip died down.  A failed attempt to acquire RCA left him
more determined than ever. He then set his sights on
Martin-Marietta, an undervalued gem in the 1982 stock market slump.
Thus began an all-out war of tenders and countertenders, egoism and
conceit, half-truths and dissimulation, and sudden alliances and
last-minute court decisions.

This is a very exciting account of the war's scuffles, skirmishes,
and battles.  The author, son of a long-time Bendix director, was
able to interview some of the major participants who most likely
would have refused the requests of other authors.  Some gave him
access to personal notes from the various proceedings.  The author
thoroughly researched the documents involved in the takeover war,
as well as news reports and press releases.   He explains the
complicated legal maneuverings very clearly, all the while keeping
the reader entertained with the personal lives and thoughts of the
players.

People love this book. The New York Times Book Review said
"Aggression and treachery, hairbreadth escapes and last-minute
reversals, "white knights" and "shark repellants" - all of these
and more can be found in the true-life adventure of the
Bendix-Martin Marietta merger war."  The Wall Street Journal said
"Merger brims with tension, authentic-sounding dialogue and
insider detail."

Peter F. Hartz was born in Toronto, Canada, in 1953, and moved to
the U.S. as a child.  He holds degrees from Colgate University and
Brown University.  He lives in Toluca Lake, California.



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2019.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***