---

         T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Friday, February 14, 2020, Vol. 24, No. 44

                            Headlines

2NDCH LLC: Seeks Approval of Non-Material Modifications to Plan
5TH STREET PARKING: Court Permits Successor Lender to Foreclose
ABUNDANT LIFE: $273K Sale of York Property to Nguyens Approved
ADAM KANTER: Hearing on Hollywood Property Sale Moved to Feb. 27
ALORICA INC: Moody's Cuts CFR to Caa2; On Review for Downgrade

ALPHA SCREEN: Exclusivity Period Extended to March 23
AMERICAN LIQUOR: Gets OK to Use Cash Collateral Thru Feb. 19
AMISH FARMERS: Taps Schneider & Stone as Legal Counsel
APPLE LAND: Proposed Sale of Two Dodge Vans Approved
ARRO CORP: Feb. 25 Auction of All or Substantially All Assets Set

ASPEN LANDSCAPING: 50% Shareholder Questions Plan
ASPEN LANDSCAPING: Committee Says Plan Disclosures Inadequate
AT&T INC: Moody's Rates Series C Perpetual Preferred Stock 'Ba1'
B&T GLOBAL: Court Approves Plan & Disclosures
B&T GLOBAL: Unsecureds Owed $110K to Split $22.5K in Plan

B. & J. PROPERTY: Court Confirms Reorganization Plan
BAYPORT CORPORATION: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
BENBOW VALLEY: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to March 24
BIKRAM'S YOGA: Trustee's Sherriff's Sale of Collector Cars Approved
BLUE DOG: Court Confirms Amended Plan of Liquidation

BODY TRANSIT: Selling All North Coventry Assets for $243K
BOURDOW CONTRACTING: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to Feb. 29
BROWNLEE FARM: Unsecureds to Get Net Proceeds After Secureds
BUMBLE BEE: $931M Sale of Company Assets to Tonos Approved
BYRON DAVID: Court Narrows Summit Community Bank's Claims

CEL-SCI CORPORATION: Reports $5.5-Mil. Net Loss for First Quarter
CHARLENE CORP: Plan Payments to be Funded by Francis Xavier Whelan
CHOICE ONE: March 12 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
CINEMARK HOLDINGS: Fitch Assigns First-Time BB- IDR, Outlook Stable
CLOVER TECHNOLOGIES: Dan Perez to Be CEO of Reorganized Clover

DIJA HOLDINGS: Court Confirms Third Amended Plan
ELECTRONIC SERVICE: Cash Collateral Use Continued Until March 1
ELITE PHARMACEUTICALS: Reports 1.9-Mil. Net Loss for 3rd Quarter
EMPRESAS CARRION: Says Negotiations With Oriental Still Ongoing
ENLINK MIDSTREAM: Moody's Affirms Ba1 Corp. Family Rating

FF FUND I: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to May 21
FIRST FLORIDA: Exclusivity Period Extended to March 2
FIZZ & BUBBLE: Gets Final Nod to Use Cash Collateral Until March 27
FOREVER 21: Exclusivity Period Extended to April 27
FUSE GROUP: Reports $29K Net Loss for First Quarter Ended Dec. 31

GABRIEL INVESTMENT: Exclusivity Period Extended to March 24
GALVESTON BAY PROPERTIES: March 9 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
GATEWAY WIRELESS: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
GOLDEN JUBILEE: Unsec. Creditors to Get Payment for 20 Quarters
GRACE PARK TOWNHOME: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors

GREEN GLOBAL: PA Dept. of Revenue Objects to Disclosures & Plan
GULF COAST: Loroh's Objection to $7.8M Sale of All Assets Overruled
HARDEN FARMS: March 17 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
HARVEY OST OILFIELD: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
HEATING & PLUMBING: Unsecureds to Get Share of  Revenue for 5 Years

IMMACULATA UNIVERSITY: Fitch Cuts $38.4MM 2017 Bonds to BB-
JERRY LEE HARTLEY: $2.5M Sale of Funeral Home to DET Approved
JIMLYN ENTERPRISES: March 5 Plan & Disclosures Hearing Set
KINGMAN FARMS: Up to $650K Equity Investment to Fund 100% Plan
L.A. VINAS: Unsecureds Owed $1.46M to Get $30K in 5 Years in Plan

LEGRACE CORP: Unsecureds Will be Paid on Installments
LIGHTHOUSE HOSPITALITY: Unsec. Creditors to Get 100% in 5 Years
MATRA PETROLEUM: Exclusivity Period Extended to March 27
MB CONTRACT TELEPHONE: Seeks to Hire Cutright as Legal Counsel
MB CONTRACT TELEPHONE: Taps Sager Financial Services as Accountant

MC CLOUD TRUCKING: Has Until Feb. 24 to File Plan & Disclosures
MCCLATCHY COMPANY: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
MCCLATCHY COMPANY: Files for Chapter 11 with Plan
MCCLATCHY COMPANY: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 1.6% in Plan
MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL: March 12 Plan & Disclosures Hearing Set

MELBOURNE BEACH: Trustee's March 10 Auction of Melbourne Assets Set
MELINTA THERAPEUTICS: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral on Final Basis
MR. CAMPER: March 11 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
MW HORTICULTURE: Has Until April 29 to File Plan & Disclosures
NEWARK SPECIAL: Bank Says Plan Not Feasible, Seeks Dismissal

NOFALIA INC: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
NORTIS INC: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to March 27
NULIFE MULHOLLAND: Exclusivity Period Extended to May 22
NUVECTRA CORP: Access to Cash Collateral Until Feb. 28 Okayed
O'LINN SECURITY: Disclosure Statement Hearing Continued to March 10

OLDE LIBRARY: Exclusivity Period Extended to May 23
OLEGNA FUSCHI-AIBEL: Court Keeps Chapter 7 Conversion Order
OMG MH HOLDINGS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
PES HOLDINGS: Term Lender Group Files 2nd Modified Statement
PICACHO HILLS UTILITY: Court Keeps Ruling on Bright View Claim

PINNACLE REGIONAL: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
PUERTO RICAN PARADE: Feb. 27 Plan & Disclosure Hearing Set
PYXUS INTERNATIONAL: Incurs $22.4-Mil. Net Loss in Third Quarter
R-BOC REPRESENTATIVES: Feb. 20 Plan & Disclosure Hearing Set
RESTLAND MEMORIAL: To Seek Plan Confirmation March 19

RICKY TUCKER: Pecan Hill Buying Enigma Property for $475K
RIOT BLOCKCHAIN: Extends CEO McGonegal's Contract by One Year
ROBUST LLC: US Trustee Has Limited Objection to Disc. Statement
ROCKPOINT GAS: Fitch Alters Outlook on 'B-' LT IDR to Stable
ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY: Moody's Affirms $35MM Series 2007 Bonds at B1

RWS CHARTER: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
SAGG MAIN: Unsecureds Are Unimpaired in Plan
SAI SB CENTER: March 3 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
SALEM CITY, NJ: Moody's Alters Outlook on GOULT Rating to Stable
SBL HOLDINGS: Fitch Rates $375MM Series A Preferred Stock 'BB'

SENSATA TECHNOLOGIES: Moody's Affirms Ba2 CFR, Outlook Stable
SOUTH COAST BEHAVIORAL: Given More Time to File Exit Plan
SOUTHCROSS ENERGY: Martinez Wants Plan to Comply With Stipulation
SOUTHERN FOODS: Joshua D. Haar Represents Equity Shareholders
SPINEGUARD INC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

STONE OAK MEMORY: Exclusivity Period Extended to March 29
TARONIS TECHNOLOGIES: Mitchell Kopin, et al. Report 0.3% Stake
TARONIS TECHNOLOGIES: Offering up to $8 Million Common Shares
TENDER LOVING HOME: To Seek Plan Confirmation March 19
TEXAS ROADRUNNER: $50K Sale of 3 Pacer Trailers to A & A Approved

TEXAS ROADRUNNER: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis
THOMAS HEALTH: Wins Interim Approval to Use Cash Collateral
TNR HOLDINGS: Proposes Auction of All Assets
TRINITA PARETE: Case Summary & 7 Unsecured Creditors
UNIVAR SOLUTIONS: Fitch Affirms LT IDR at 'BB', Outlook Positive

VIDANGEL INC: Trustee's $25K Sale of Application Papers Approved
WC 56 EAST AVENUE: Seeks to Hire McAllister as Real Estate Broker
WD-I ASSOCIATES: $1.9M Sale of Parcel E to Drayton-Parker Approved
WD-I ASSOCIATES: $18.75M Sale of All Assets to BOKF Approved
WESTERN RESERVE: U.S. Trustee Objects to Disclosure Statement

WHEATON MEDICAL: Unsec. Creditors to Get Full Payment in 5 Years
[*] Bryan Kotliar Joins Katten's Bankruptcy Practice in New York
[^] BOOK REVIEW: BOARD GAMES - Changing Shape of Corporate Power

                            *********

2NDCH LLC: Seeks Approval of Non-Material Modifications to Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor 2ndch, LLC, d/b/a Gumbo's North, filed a motion for approval
of Pre-Confirmation Non-Material Modifications to its First Amended
Small Business Combined Disclosure Statement & Plan of
Reorganization.

Subject to approval of the modifications proposed herein, the IRS
has cast a ballot on behalf of its Class 6 claim to accept the
Plan, as modified. In connection with the negotiations and
discussions with the Texas Comptroller, the IRS, and the US
Trustee, the Debtor has prepared a modification to the First
Amended Combined Disclosure Statement and Plan.

The proposed modifications are designed to remove Sections 13.03
and 13.04, which were objectionable to the United States Trustee,
the IRS, and the Texas Comptroller.

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1127(a) and (c) and Federal Rule of
Bankruptcy Procedure 3019(a), the Debtor hereby requests that the
Bankruptcy Court determine that the modifications to the Plan are
non-material.

The Plan has been accepted by Class 5. The Plan as proposed to be
modified has been accepted by Class 6.  The proposed modifications
are designed to eliminate objections by the US Trustee, the Texas
Comptroller, and the IRS.

The Debtor believes that the modifications are either improvements,
agreements, and/or clarifications of law, that do not adversely
impact the treatment of any creditor. Instead, these modifications
beneficially impact the treatment of all affected creditors and/or
merely clarify the impact of the Plan.

A copy of the Motion dated January 23, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/vscwan6 from PacerMonitor at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

      Kell C. Mercer, P.C.
      Kell C. Mercer
      1602 E. Cesar Chavez Street
      Austin, Texas 78702
      Tel: (512) 627-3512
      Fax: (512) 597-0767
      E-mail: kell.mercer@mercer-law-pc.com

                      About 2ndCh, LLC

2ndCh, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 19-11127) on Aug. 26, 2019.  In the
petition signed by its manager, Shuler W. Page, the Debtor
disclosed assets ranging between $500,001 and $1 million and
liabilities of the same range.  The Debtor is represented by Kell
C. Mercer, P.C.


5TH STREET PARKING: Court Permits Successor Lender to Foreclose
---------------------------------------------------------------
5th Street Parking LLC on April 30, 2015, executed, acknowledged,
and delivered to Nautilus Capital LLC a Promissory Note covenanting
and agreeing to repay Nautilus in the amount of $2,000,000.  The
Debtor executed, acknowledged, and delivered a Mortgage and
Security Agreement to Nautilus encumbering the Property to secure
payment recorded on May 14, 2015 in the Office of the City Register
of the City of New York. Also, the Debtor's principal, Mylene
Liggett, executed an Unlimited Guaranty to guarantee all
obligations under the Note to Nautilus in the amount of
$2,000,000.

On August 1, 2016, the Debtor defaulted on its obligations under
the Loan Documents by failing to make the required monthly payment
due on August 1, 2016, and each payment thereafter.  Nautilus filed
a summons and complaint with the New York County Clerk. On February
26, 2017, the Debtor and its principal asserted counterclaims.
Nautilus then filed an application for entry of an order granting
summary judgment, and the state court granted Nautilus'
application.

After failed attempts by the Debtor to vacate the state court's
summary judgment decision, the state court granted a Judgment of
Foreclosure and Sale in favor of Nautilus on September 19, 2019,
entitling Nautilus to foreclose on the Property and awarding
Nautilus $3,181,169.26. Pursuant to a Notice of Sale filed on
November 14, 2018, a foreclosure sale was scheduled for December
11, 2018.

On February 15, 2018, Nautilus assigned the Note and Mortgage to
L&L Capital Partners LLC.  On May 1, 2019, L&L assigned the Note
and Mortgage to USC 1994 Madison LLC pursuant to an Assignment of
Mortgage.

In the Debtor's Chapter 11 case, Madison asked the Court for entry
of an order:

     (1) granting relief from the automatic stay pursuant to
Bankruptcy Code sections 105(a), 361, 362(d)(1), 362(d)(2), and
362(d)(3) so that it may exercise all rights and remedies available
to it under applicable law with respect to the real property at
1994-2002 Madison Avenue and 1998 Madison Avenue, New York, New
York 10035; and

     (2) granting in rem and/or prospective relief pursuant to
Bankruptcy Code sections 105(a), 109(g)(1) and 362(d)(4), such that
the automatic stay from any future filings under the Bankruptcy
Code by 5th Street Parking and/or any person or entity having or
claiming an interest in the Property within two years shall not
attach to the Property.

In a January 24, 2020 Memorandum Opinion available at
https://is.gd/epkLGT from Leagle.com, Judge Martin Glenn finds that
Madison has standing to lift the automatic stay as the Debtor's
creditor. The Note and Mortgage provide sufficient evidence to show
that Madison is the Debtor's creditor.  The Court also held that
the Debtor failed to comply with section 362(d)(3)'s statutory
requirements which necessitates lifting the automatic stay as
acknowledged by the counsel.

According to the Court, the Debtor failed, as a Single Asset Real
Estate ("SARE") entity, to comply with the requirements to preserve
the automatic stay in a SARE case.  The Court also granted Madison
in rem relief under Bankruptcy Code section 362(d)(4), permitting
it to proceed with foreclosure on the Property unimpeded by any
future filings by the Debtor in the Bankruptcy Court or any other
court for the next two years.

5th Street Parking LLC, is the fee simple owner of a vacant Land
(100 ft x 35) located at 2000 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10035
aka 127th and Madison having an appraised value of $7.8 million.

It filed for Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
19-12821) on September 3, 2019.  The Company previously sought
bankruptcy protection on Dec. 7, 2018 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
18-13979).

In the 2019 petition, the Debtor disclosed $7,800,102 in total
assets and $3,181,169 in total liabilities.  The petition was
signed by Mylene Liggett, member.

The Debtor is represented by the Law Office of Julio E. Portilla,
P.C.



ABUNDANT LIFE: $273K Sale of York Property to Nguyens Approved
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Henry W. Van Eck of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Pennsylvania authorized Abundant Life Outreach, Inc.'s
sale of the real estate located at 401 North George Street, York,
York County, Pennsylvania to David Nguyen and Jessica Nguyen for
$273,000, pursuant to their Agreement of Sale.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances and
other interests.  All liens and claims will be transferred and
attached to the net proceeds.

Pursuant to the Agreement, the Debtor, as the Seller, will pay
costs and expenses associated with the sale of the Real Property at
closing as follows:

     a. Any notarization or incidental filing charges required to
be paid by the Debtor as the Seller.

     b. All other costs and charges apportioned to the Debtor as
the Seller.

     c. All costs associated with the preparation of the conveyance
instruments and normal services with respect to closing to Law
Offices of Craig A. Diehl in the amount of $600 per lot closing.
Said amount will be held in escrow pending Court approval of a
Final Fee Application.

     d. Realtor commissions of 6%.

     e. Present real estate taxes will be pro-rated to the date of
closing on the sale.

     f. Any municipal charges and liens, pro-rated to the date of
closing on the sale.

     g. Any realty transfer taxes will be divided equally between
Buyers and Seller.

     h. Payment of United States Trustee's fees resulting from this
transaction in the amount of $1,975.

     i. Payment of delinquent real estate taxes.

     j. Payment to Community First Fund to partially satisfy its
indebtedness; and

     k. Any residual proceeds toward tax liens of PA Department of
Labor & Industry.

If the proposed sale of the Real Property fails to close for any
reason, then such liens and claims will continue against it
unaffected by the Order.  All holders of recorded liens and claims
affecting the Real Property are hereby directed to prepare, and
record promptly after the closing of sale of the Real Property,
releases such liens and claims reasonable satisfactory to the
Buyers.

                  About Abundant Life Outreach

Abundant Life Outreach, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 19-04091) on Sept.
25, 2019.  In the petition signed by Anthony W. Sease, chief
executive officer, the Debtor was estimated to have assets ranging
between $500,001 and $1 million, and liabilities of the same
range.

On Nov. 6, 2019, the court ordered the dismissal of the Debtor's
case.  The case was reopened on Nov. 25, 2019.

Judge Henry W. Van Eck presides over the case.  The Debtor tapped
the Law Offices of Craig A. Diehl as its legal counsel.


ADAM KANTER: Hearing on Hollywood Property Sale Moved to Feb. 27
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Scott M. Grossman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida continued the hearing on Adam Kanter's
sale of the office building property located at 1917 Harrison
Street, Hollywood, Florida, legally described as: Hollywood 1-21 B
Lot 16 Block 25, to John DeMarco or related entity for $550,000, to
Feb. 27, 2020 at 1:30 p.m.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Jan. 23, 2020.

The deposition of interested party Kenneth Shimm scheduled by the
Debtor for Jan. 23, 2020 is continued to Jan. 27, 2020.  Shimm will
produce all documents requested by the Debtor on Jan. 24, 2020 at
5:00 p.m.  The foregoing dates may be rescheduled by agreement of
the parties.

The evidentiary hearing to consider the Debtor's Sale Motion is
continued to Feb. 27, 2020 at 1:30 p.m.  All discovery must be
completed not later than Feb. 21, 2020.  The court will allow
discovery after that date only upon a showing of good cause.

No later than 5:00 p.m. on Feb. 24, 2020, all parties must exchange
and file with the Court witness lists identifying all fact and
expert witnesses each party intends to call at the evidentiary
hearing (other than rebuttal or impeachment witnesses), which
witness lists must incorporate the information about each witness,
any expert report(s), and any expert's opinion, as required by
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a).

Unless ordered otherwise, each party must serve the following
documents in electronic format on each opposing party so as to be
received no later than 2:00 p.m. on Feb. 24, 2020:

     a. A set of pre-marked exhibits (including any summaries)
intended to be offered as evidence at the evidentiary hearing.

          i. Exhibits submitted by the Debtor must be sequentially
numbered.

          ii. Exhibits submitted by Shimm must be identified by
sequential letters.

     b. Each party must provide electronic copies of all exhibits,
which must be emailed to chambers at SMG_chambers@flsb.uscourts.gov
no later than 5:00 p.m. on Feb. 24, 2020.  If a party intends to
submit more than ten exhibits, the exhibits must be delivered to
chambers on a USB drive, instead of by email.

          i. Exhibits must be saved in electronic Portable Document
Format (PDF).

          ii. Each individual PDF file is limited to a single
exhibit of a file size no greater than 10MB.

          iii. Each PDF file of an exhibit must be identified by
the number or letter by which the exhibit will be introduced at the

evidentiary hearing.  The documents may be submitted as a single
electronic file as long as bookmarks are included that identify
each exhibit by name and number or letter.

          iv. The email must be accompanied by an Exhibit Register
conforming to Local Form 49.

     c. Any objection to the admissibility of any proposed exhibit
must be filed and served, so as to be received no later than 2:00
p.m. on Feb. 26, 2020.  Objections to any deposition transcripts,
including a recording (audio or video) or summary thereof, must
follow the procedure specified in this paragraph.  Failure to
comply with this procedure will result in waiver of the objection.


          i. The objection must (a) identify the exhibit, (b) state
the grounds for the objection, and (c) provide citations to case
law and other authority in support of the objection.

          ii. An objection not so made -- except for one under
Federal Rule of Evidence 402 or 403 -- is waived unless excused by
the Court for good cause.  

          iii. All parties must comply with the requirements
regarding exhibits set forth in Local Rule 9070-1.

At the Evidentiary Hearing, each party must bring at least one
paper copy its exhibit register for the Court's use, and one
complete hardcopy book of all its exhibits and the exhibit
register, for any potential witness to use while testifying.

Shimm will file a written response to the Sale Motion on Feb. 7,
2020.

The time period to respond to all written discovery and for notice
to appear for deposition is shortened to 10 days.  

Adam Kanter sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
19-25312) on Nov. 14, 2019.  The Debtor tapped Bart A. Houston,
Esq., as counsel.



ALORICA INC: Moody's Cuts CFR to Caa2; On Review for Downgrade
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Alorica Inc.'s Corporate
Family Rating to Caa2 from Caa1, Probability of Default to Caa2-PD
from Caa1-PD and its senior secured facility (including revolving
credit facility, term loan A and term loan B) to Caa2 from Caa1.
The ratings have also been placed under review for further
downgrade.

Moody's decision to downgrade the CFR to Caa2 and place Alorica's
ratings under review reflects incremental concern regarding the
company's ability to secure another extension for the upcoming $100
million principal payment under the term loan A due February 14,
2020, as well as the risk that it could face difficulty in
refinancing its current capital structure on time and under
economical terms. Delays in completing a comprehensive refinancing
transaction could materially strain already weak liquidity and
increase the probability of default.

Moody's review for downgrade will focus on 1) Alorica's ability to
obtain an extension for the February 14, 2020 upcoming principal
payment under the term loan A, 2) the company's plan to address
upcoming debt maturities in 2021 and 2022 by putting in place a
more attenable capital structure, 3) alleviating its currently
strained liquidity, and 4) management's ability to materially
improve operating performance. Should the company be unable to make
meaningful progress with its lenders or if the amendment process
results in a balance sheet restructuring (such as a distressed
exchange), Alorica's ratings could be downgraded by more than one
notch.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's downgraded and placed the following ratings of Alorica Inc.
on review for further downgrade:

Corporate Family Rating, to Caa2 from Caa1

Probability of Default Rating, to Caa2-PD from Caa1-PD

$200 million first lien senior secured revolving credit facility
due 2021, to Caa2 (LGD3) from Caa1 (LGD3)

$281 million first lien senior secured term loan A due 2021, to
Caa2 (LGD3) from Caa1 (LGD3)

$286 million first lien senior secured term loan B due 2022, to
Caa2 (LGD3) from Caa1 (LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Rating under review for downgrade from negative

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

Alorica Inc., headquartered in Irvine, CA, is third largest global
customer interaction business-process-outsourcing services provider
with estimated revenue of approximately $2.0 billion at September
30, 2019. The company offers customer service, technical support,
customer acquisition and retention back office support services.
The company has more than 100,000 employees in 105 locations across
14 countries globally, serving many Fortune 500 companies.
Alorica's management team owns a majority of the company, with a
minority stake held by One Equity Partners.


ALPHA SCREEN: Exclusivity Period Extended to March 23
-----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
extended to March 23 the exclusivity period for Alpha Screen
Graphics, Inc. to file a Chapter 11 plan and disclosure statement.


Alpha Screen is currently attempting to procure a sale of its
business -- the outcome of which will materially affect the
direction of its bankruptcy case. Furthermore, the court has
recently entered an order regarding the motion for relief from stay
filed by the company's landlord, which gave the company an
opportunity to procure a sale of its business by Feb. 28.  The
company's ability to obtain a purchaser for its business is
critical for the resolution of its case and the formulation of any
plan.

                    About Alpha Screen Graphics

Alpha Screen Graphics, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 19-22969) on July 26, 2019, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The petition was
signed by Jack Schmidt, president. Judge Carlota M. Bohm oversees
the case.

The Debtor is represented by Robert O Lampl, Esq., at Robert O
Lampl Law Office.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.


AMERICAN LIQUOR: Gets OK to Use Cash Collateral Thru Feb. 19
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas L. Perkins authorized American Liquor & Foodmart, LLC
to use cash collateral for the period from the Petition Date
through the close of business on February 19, 2020, pursuant to the
budget.

The Court ruled that Debtor may not use any cash collateral to pay
Pradeep Kataria for any reason or for Pradeep Kataria's benefit,
other than payment for compensation that may be allowed by the
Court, notwithstanding anything contained in the budget, unless the
Court enters a final order regarding Debtor's use of cash
collateral that allows said payments or the parties otherwise reach
an agreement regarding said payments.

As adequate protection,  Princeville State Bank, as secured lender,
is granted a replacement, automatically perfected security interest
and lien in an amount equal to the cash collateral used by the
Debtor in all of the Debtor's real and personal property.

A copy of the interim order is available at https://is.gd/z5iUmK
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                About American Liquor & Foodmart

American Liquor & Foodmart, LLC is a privately held company that
owns and operates convenience store and gas station.  

The company filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. C.D.
Ill. Case No. 20-80044) on Jan. 13, 2020.  In the petition signed
by Pradeep Kataria, manager, the Debtor was estimated to have
between $1 million and $10 million in both assets and liabilities.
Judge Thomas L. Perkins is assigned to the case.  Rafool, Bourne &
Shelby, P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.


AMISH FARMERS: Taps Schneider & Stone as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
Amish Farmers, Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Illinois to hire Schneider &
Stone as its legal counsel.
   
Schneider & Stone will assist the Debtor in the preparation of a
Chapter 11 plan and will provide other legal services in connection
with its Chapter 11 case.  

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Attorney    $375 per hour
     Paralegal   $175 per hour
  
Schneider & Stone does not have an interest materially adverse to
the interest of the Debtor's bankruptcy estate, creditors and
equity security holders, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Ben Schneider, Esq.
     Matthew Stone, Esq.
     Schneider & Stone
     8424 Skokie Blvd., Suite 200
     Skokie, IL 60077
     Phone: 847-933-0300
     Email: ben@windycitylawgroup.com

                      About Amish Farmers

Amish Farmers, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 19-36391) on Dec. 30,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of between $100,001 and $500,000 and liabilities of between
$500,001 and $1 million.  Judge Timothy A. Barnes oversees the
case.  Schneider & Stone is the Debtor's legal counsel.


APPLE LAND: Proposed Sale of Two Dodge Vans Approved
----------------------------------------------------
Judge Catherine J. Furay of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Wisconsin authorized Apple Land Sports Supply,
Inc.'s sale of the following two vehicles: (i) 2015 Dodge van - VIN
2C4RDGBG6FR598883 and (ii) 2013 Dodge van - VIN 2C4RDGBG2DR709765.

The Debtor will file a report of sale with the Court within 10 days
of the sale.
    
                  About Apple Land Sports Supply

Apple Land Sports Supply Inc., a wholesaler of sporting goods,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
W.D. Wis. Case No. 19-12609) on Aug. 1, 2019.  At the time of the
filing, Apple Land Sports Supply disclosed assets of between $1
million and $10 million and liabilities of the same range.  The
case has been assigned to Judge Catherine J. Furay.  Apple Land
Sports Supply is represented by Pittman & Pittman Law Offices, LLC.


ARRO CORP: Feb. 25 Auction of All or Substantially All Assets Set
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Janet S. Baer of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Illinois authorized Arro Corp.'s (i) sale process,
including the form of Asset Purchase Agreement, bid protection, and
break-up fee in connection with the auction sale of all or
substantially all of its assets; (ii) procedures for the assumption
and assignment of executory contracts and unexpired leases; and
(iii) the form of notices.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Jan. 23, 2020 at 9:30 a.m.

The Debtor is permitted to revise the Form APA in consultation with
the Constituent Parties, subject to final approval at the Sale
Hearing.

The bidding procedures set forth in the Approved Bidding Procedures
is approved.  The Debtor is permitted to revise the Approved
Bidding Procedures after consultation with the Constituent Parties,
or further Order of the Court.

The Summary Notice of Sale of All or Substantially All Assets of
Debtor is approved.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Feb. 21, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. (CT).  On Feb. 14,
2020 at 6:00 p.m., after consultation with the Constituent Parties
and without further order of Court, the Debtor is authorized, but
not directed, to designate the highest and/or otherwise best
Qualified Bid then received by the Debtor to serve as the Stalking
Horse Bid.

     b. Qualified Bid: Any Qualified Bid must offer aggregate
consideration in the amount equal to or greater than the Initial
Overbid Amount.

     c. Deposit: 10% of Purchase Price

     d. Auction: The auction for the Sale Property will take place
on Feb. 25, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. (Chicago time) at the offices of
Adelman & Gettleman, Ltd, 53 West Jackson Blvd, Suite 1050,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, or such later time or other place as the
Debtor will notify all Qualified Bidders and all Noticed Parties.

     e. Bid Increments: $100,000

     f. Sale Hearing: Feb. 27, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

     g. Sale Objection Deadline: Feb. 26, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. (CT)

     h. Closing: Within 15 days after entry of the Sale Order

     i. Breakup Fee: To induce Qualified Bidders to submit bids
prior to the Stalking Horse Designation Deadline and to serve as
the Stalking Horse, the Debtor may provide to the Stalking Horse:
(a) bid protection such that any bid seeking to compete with the
Stalking Horse Bid must exceed the Stalking Horse Bid by an amount
of $250,000; and (b) a termination fee and expense reimbursement in
the amount of 3% of the purchase price set forth in the Stalking
Horse APA, exciuding any applicableCure Costs as set forth in the
APA.

No later than 4:00 p.m. (CT) on the first business day immediately
following the Bid Deadline, the Debtor will file the Assumption
Notice to any non-debtor party to any executory contract or
unexpired lease whose assumption and assignment any Qualified
Bidder has identified as a condition to closing.  The Cure
Amount/Assignment Objection Deadline is 5:00 p.m. (CT) on Feb. 26,
2020.

The stays provided for in Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d) are
waived and the Sale Procedures Order will be effective immediately
upon its entry.

A copy of the APA and the Bidding Procedures is available at
https://tinyurl.com/w7ag48y from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                    About Arro Corporation

Arro Corporation -- https://arro.com/ -- provides food contract
manufacturing, processing, logistics and warehousing services.  It
offers custom dry, liquid blending, reprocessing, bulk handling and
processing services.

Arro Corporation sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 19-35238) on Dec. 13,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of
between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities of the same
range.  Judge Janet S. Baer oversees the case.  

Adam P. Silverman, Esq., at Adelman & Gettleman, Ltd., is the
Debtor's legal counsel.  Livingstone Partners LLC serves as the
Debtor's investment banker.

On Dec. 23, 2019, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee selected
Goldstein & McClintock LLLP as its counsel and Conway Mackenzie,
Inc., as its financial advisor.


ASPEN LANDSCAPING: 50% Shareholder Questions Plan
-------------------------------------------------
Donald Fuentes objects to the disclosure statement explaining the
Chapter 11 Plan filed by debtor Aspen Landscaping Contracting,
Inc.

Aspen is an S-Corporation started by Donald and his ex-wife, Maria
Fuentes. On July 25, 2019, the Family Court entered a Dual Judgment
of Divorce (JOD), which was later amended by an Amended Dual
Judgment of Divorce. Pursuant to the JOD, the State Court
determined, among other things, that Donald and Maria were each 50%
shareholders in Aspen.

Fuentes in his objections raises the following issues:

   * Although the Disclosure Statement suggests that all equity
interests are to be treated the same, Aspen's Plan proposes to give
Maria the exclusive right to acquire 100% of the equity in a
reorganized entity.

  * Because Maria is receiving something under the Plan on account
of her equity interest, but Donald is not, the Plan plainly
violates section 1123(a)(4).

  * The Plan violates the absolute priority rule codified in
section 1129(b)(2)(B) because it would fail to pay the class of
general unsecured creditors in full, while letting Maria acquire
100% of the equity in a reorganized debtor.

  * The Disclosure Statement is inadequate because it fails to
adequately indicate the value of certain of the Debtor's assets, as
a result of which it cannot be determined whether the Plan
satisfies the best interest of creditors test.

  * The liquidation analysis at page 33 of the Disclosure Statement
indicates the value of the Debtor's equipment and vehicles to be
unknown. This is inadequate disclosure.

A full-text copy of Donald Fuentes' objection to disclosure dated
January 23, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/weumv3a from
PacerMonitor at no charge.

Donald Fuentes is represented by:

      WEBBER MCGILL LLC
      Douglas J. McGill, Esq.
      Whippany, New Jersey 07981
      Tel: (973) 739-9559
      Fax: (973) 739-9575

           - and -

      BRACH EICHLER LLC
      Carl J. Soranno, Esq.
      101 Eisenhower Parkway
      Roseland, New Jersey 07068-1067
      Tel: (973) 228-5700

            About Aspen Landscaping Contracting

Aspen Landscaping Contracting, Inc. --https://www.aspennj.net/--is
a landscaping contractor located in Union, New Jersey serving
commercial and residential clients. The company offers wetland
mitigation, planting, hydroseeding, irrigation, railroad spraying,
tree removal/pruning/clearing, erosion control/soil stabilization,
soil procurement and grading, and landfill work.

Aspen Landscaping Contracting sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D.N.J. Case No. 19-31885) on Nov. 20, 2019 in Newark, New Jersey.
In the petition was signed by Maria A. Fuentes, president, the
Debtor was listed with total assets at $2,429,468 and total
liabilities at $2,510,983.

Judge Vincent F. Papalia oversees the case.

MCMANIMON, SCOTLAND & BAUMANN, LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.  SAX,
LLP, serves as accountant to the Debtor.


ASPEN LANDSCAPING: Committee Says Plan Disclosures Inadequate
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of debtor Aspen
Landscaping Contracting, Inc., submitted an objection to the
Disclosure Statement describing Chapter 11 Plan proposed by the
Debtor.

According to the Committee, the Disclosure Statement generally does
not contain adequate information because it does not contain
information that would allow unsecured creditors to make an
informed decision on whether or not to vote in favor of the Plan.

The Committee cites:

  * Unsecured creditors are being asked to support a plan that
offers a fixed distribution pool of only $500,000 without a clear
understanding of the universe of unsecured claims that would be
sharing those funds.

  * The Debtor has not yet provided the value of its assets,
including the value of its fleet of vehicles, its inventory and
equipment, its lien claims and causes of action, and various other
assets listed on its schedules, which the Committee believes could
be substantial.  The Committee further believes that there has been
inadequate disclosure regarding the collectability of the accounts
receivable.

  * Nor does the Disclosure Statement value or otherwise address
avoidance actions.  To that end, it appears that the Debtor may not
have fully disclosure insider transactions.

  * The Committee requires more information relative to any
potential claim against M&T Bank to evaluate whether recovery to
unsecured creditors may flow therefrom.

  * Also missing from the Disclosure Statement is any information
relating to projected future revenue and expenses of the Debtor so
as to justify jilting unsecured creditors to the extent proposed
under the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Committee's objection dated Jan. 23, 2020,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/shrcqwx from PacerMonitor at no
charge.

Counsel to Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors:

         Sydney J. Darling, Esq.
         Stephen V. Falanga, Esq.
         WALSH PIZZI O'REILLY FALANGA LLP
         Three Gateway Center
         100 Mulberry St., 15th Floor
         Newark, New Jersey 07102
         Tel: 973.757.1100
         Fax: 973.757.1090
         E-mail: sdarling@walsh.law
                 sfalanga@walsh.law

             About Aspen Landscaping Contracting

Aspen Landscaping Contracting, Inc. -- https://www.aspennj.net/ --
is a landscaping contractor located in Union, New Jersey serving
commercial and residential clients.  The company offers wetland
mitigation, planting, hydroseeding, irrigation, railroad spraying,
tree removal/pruning/clearing, erosion control/soil stabilization,
soil procurement and grading, and landfill work.

Aspen Landscaping Contracting sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D.N.J. Case No. 19-31885) on Nov. 20, 2019 in Newark, New Jersey.
In the petition was signed by Maria A. Fuentes, president, the
Debtor was listed with total assets at $2,429,468 and total
liabilities at $2,510,983.

Judge Vincent F. Papalia oversees the case.

MCMANIMON, SCOTLAND & BAUMANN, LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.  SAX,
LLP, serves as accountant to the Debtor.


AT&T INC: Moody's Rates Series C Perpetual Preferred Stock 'Ba1'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba1 rating to AT&T Inc.'s
proposed Series C Perpetual Preferred Stock. AT&T intends to use
the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, which Moody's
believes may include the repurchase of its common stock under its
ongoing share repurchase program.

Assignments:

Issuer: AT&T Inc.

Perpetual Preferred Stock, Assigned Ba1

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba1 rating on AT&T's preferred stock reflects the preferred
stock's subordinated, and junior in right of payment position, to
AT&T's outstanding long-term debt. It is also subordinated to any
future subordinated debt issuance, though there is none as of
February 13, 2020. The two-notch differential between the Ba1
assigned to the Series C Preferred Stock and AT&T's Baa2 unsecured
rating is consistent with its methodology guidance for notching
corporate instrument ratings based on differences in security and
priority of claim.

The preferred stock contains equity-like features including no
stated maturity and the option to skip coupon payments if the
common stock dividend is suspended. Since investment-grade issuers
have rarely missed coupon payments on these types of securities,
Moody's considers the cash flow stream associated with them to be
similar in nature to the cash outflows associated with servicing
debt. As a result, these securities receive only partial equity
treatment in Moody's calculation of debt coverage and financial
leverage ratios. The preferred stock will receive basket "C"
treatment (i.e. 50% equity and 50% debt) for the purpose of
adjusting financial statements.

AT&T's Baa2 senior unsecured rating reflects materially improved
credit metrics following a year of focused debt reduction. The
company followed the WarnerMedia acquisition with steady and
material debt reduction in 2019. Debt to EBITDA leverage with
Moody's adjustments as of December 31, 2019 was 3.1x. However,
Moody's expects further improvement in credit metrics to
dramatically slow through 2022 given the significant shift in the
company's use of pre-dividend free cash flows as management
recently announced its new 3-year capital plan, which includes $45
billion of dividends and $30 billion of share repurchases.

The company benefits from leading positions, important brands,
scale and revenue diversity that result in substantial qualitative
credit strength. AT&T, a market leader in nearly all of its
businesses, has valuable assets, predictable revenue, and healthy
margins. But these qualitative strengths are offset by outsized
shareholder dividends and expected share repurchases, anemic top
line growth and subscriber losses in several of its important
segments. Moody's believes the company is facing secular,
competitive and transition pressures in its primary segments due to
continued vulnerability from business disruption across its end
markets. In addition, continued material subscriber losses could
further limit financial flexibility and capacity relative to its
credit ratings in the future unless mitigated with debt reduction.
AT&T's financial policy is anchored by its growing common stock
dividend. However, AT&T's dividends as a percentage of pre-dividend
free cash flow has meaningfully improved after corporate tax reform
and completion of the WarnerMedia acquisition, decreasing to 46% as
of year-end 2019 from 70% as of year-end 2017.

AT&T's exposure to governance considerations reflects the company's
financial policy, which has the potential to become more aggressive
given its moderately levered capital structure, its new three-year
capital plan, its growing common stock dividend, and recent
shareholder activism. The company has achieved a company-calculated
net debt to EBITDA target of around 2.5x for year-end 2019 (about
3.1x with Moody's adjustments), and expects to reduce leverage by
around a quarter of a turn or more lower over the next three years.
From 2020 to 2022, the company commented that it expects to return
$75 billion to shareholders through $30 billion of share
retirements and $45 billion in dividends. Moody's views these
developments as credit negative in the face of a still high
absolute debt load and significant capital investment needed to
remain competitive for the long-term.

AT&T's stable outlook reflects its expectation that the company's
fundamentals, while under some pressure, will remain relatively
stable overall for the near-term, largely due to debt and leverage
reduction that occurred in 2019. In addition, Moody's expects free
cash flow will remain well in positive territory, the degree of
structural subordination in the consolidated post-close capital
structure will be managed down to pre-WarnerMedia merger levels and
liquidity will remain robust enough to comfortably address upcoming
debt maturities and all other business needs.

Moody's could upgrade AT&T's rating if fundamentals improve,
particularly with regard to subscriber numbers, investment in 5G
wireless and new TV services is competitive, leverage (with Moody's
adjustments) falls and is sustained below 3x and free cash flow to
debt remains stable (except during important investment cycles).

Moody's could downgrade AT&T's rating if free cash flow to debt
declines or becomes negative or if Moody's adjusted leverage is
above 3.5x, both on a sustained basis. In addition, worsening
secular or other declining fundamentals and/or profit margins could
result in the need for stronger credit metrics for the Baa2 rating
or could result in a downgrade of the company's debt ratings. If
liquidity weakens and the company is viewed as facing moderate to
high refinance risk rating pressure could also rise.

The principal methodology used in this rating was
Telecommunications Service Providers published in January 2017.

AT&T Inc., the largest telecommunications company in the US, has
its headquarters in Dallas, Texas. In June 2018 AT&T completed its
merger with Warner Media, LLC, adding the global media and
entertainment platforms of Warner Bros., HBO and Turner to its
sizable mobile, video, and broadband customer relationships. AT&T
generated $181 billion of revenue for full year 2019.


B&T GLOBAL: Court Approves Plan & Disclosures
---------------------------------------------
Judge Karen S. Jennemann has ordered that the Plan filed by B&T
GLOBAL LOGISTICS LLC and GREAT STATE TRANSPORT LLC is CONFIRMED.

The Disclosure Statement is APPROVED.

The Debtor will file all objections to claims within 90 days from
Feb. 3, 2020.

A post-confirmation status conference has been scheduled for March
11, 2020 at 2:00 p.m., at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 400
W. Washington Street, 6th Floor, Courtroom A, Orlando, Florida
32801.

The Plan treats claims and interests as follows:

   * Class 1: TAB2 is the Holder of the Allowed Secured Class 1
Claim. Total claim $45,000. TAB will be secured by a lien on the
TAB Collateral to the same validity and priority as existed as of
the Petition Date and shall be paid through monthly payments of
principal and interest, amortized over a period of 60 months at a
5.00 percent fixed rate of interest. The first payment will be due
on the 30th day after the Effective Date and shall continue on the
same day of each month thereafter.  The monthly payments of
principal and interest to TAB will be in the amount of $849.21.

   * Class 2: BMO is the Holder of the Allowed Secured Class 2
Claim. Total claim $128,592.  BMO will be secured by a lien on the
BMO Collateral to the same validity and priority as existed as of
the Petition Date and shall be paid as follows: (a) as to Claim
Number 2, BMO will be paid through monthly payments of principal
and interest, amortized over a period of 60 months at a 5 percent
fixed rate of interest.  The first payment will be due on the
thirtieth day after the Effective Date and shall continue on the
same day of each month thereafter. The monthly payments of
principal and interest to BMO on Claim Number 2 will be in the
amount of $1,130.14; and (b) as to Claim Number 3, BMO will be paid
through monthly payments of principal and interest, amortized over
a period of 36 months at a 5 percent fixed rate of interest.

   * Class 3: Mercedes-Benz is the Holder of the Allowed Secured
Class 3 Claim. Total claim $90,000.  Mercedes-Benz will be secured
by a lien on the Mercedes-Benz Collateral to the same validity and
priority as existed as of the Petition Date and shall be paid
through monthly payments of principal and interest, amortized over
a period of 42 months at a 7.50 percent fixed rate of interest. The
first payment will be due on the thirtieth day after the Effective
Date and shall continue on the same day of each month thereafter.
The monthly payments of principal and interest to Mercedes-Benz
will be in the amount of $2,443.

   * Class 4: Class 4 consists of the Holders of Disputed Claim of
Swift. Total claim $45,948.  Upon entry of the Lien Strip Order,
Swift became the Holder of a Class 5 Unsecured Claim.  Upon entry
of this Order confirming the Plan, the lien of Swift, which was
recorded with the Florida Secured Transaction Registry, Document
Number 201908324544, is void and extinguished.

   * Class 5: Class 5 consists of the Holders of Allowed Unsecured
Claims of B&T and Great State.  Total claim $110,369.  In full
satisfaction of the Class 5 Allowed Unsecured Claims, on the
Effective Date, the total sum of $12,500 will be paid to the
Holders of Class 5 Allowed Unsecured Claims on a Pro Rata basis.
The Holders of Class 5 Allowed Unsecured Claims shall receive an
additional $10,000 on a Pro Rata basis, which shall be paid in four
equal quarterly payments, with the first payment commencing 90 days
from the Effective Date, and every three months thereafter until
the $10,000 is paid in full.  Including the $12,500 that the
Holders of Class 5 Unsecured Claims shall receive on the Effective
Date, plus the additional $10,000 to be paid in quarterly payments,
the Holders of Class 5 Unsecured Claims will receive their pro rata
share of a total of $22,500.

   * Class 6: Class 6 consists of all Equity Interests in B&T.
Blasco will retain all Equity Interests in the Debtor.

   * Class 7: Class 7 consists of all Equity Interests in Great
State. On the Effective Date, the Debtor will cancel all existing
stock and membership interests held by any and all shareholders.

A full-text copy of the Order Confirming the Plan dated Feb. 5,
2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/uexnfl7 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                  About B&T Global Logistics

B&T Global Logistics, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-05034) on July
31, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets
of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.
Bartolone Law, PLLC, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


B&T GLOBAL: Unsecureds Owed $110K to Split $22.5K in Plan
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtors B&T Global Logistics LLC and Great State Transport LLC
filed a Second Amended Disclosure Statement regarding their
proposed Joint Plan of Reorganization.

Class 5 consists of the Allowed Unsecured Claims against B&T and
Great State.  The total amount of Allowed Unsecured Claims against
B&T and Great State is $110,369.  In full satisfaction of the Class
5 Allowed Unsecured Claims, on the Effective Date, the total sum of
$12,500 will be paid to the Holders of Class 5 Allowed Unsecured
Claims on a Pro Rata basis.  The Holders of Class 5 Allowed
Unsecured Claims shall receive an additional $10,000 on a Pro Rata
basis, which shall be paid in four equal quarterly payments.
Including the $12,500 that the Holders of Class 5 Unsecured Claims
will receive on the Effective Date, plus the additional $10,000 to
be paid in quarterly payments, the Holders of Class 5 Unsecured
Claims shall receive their Pro Rata share of a total of $22,500.
Class 5 is Impaired.

Class 6 consists of all Holders of Equity Interests in B&T. All
membership interests of B&T are held by Blasco. Blasco shall retain
all Equity Interests in the Debtor. On account of Blasco's
retention of 100% of the membership interest in B&T, Blasco shall
contribute new value in the amount of $12,500.00 on the Effective
Date.  The new value contributed by Blasco will be paid to the
Holders of Class 5 Unsecured Claims, on a Pro Rata basis, on the
Effective Date.

The Plan contemplates that a Reorganized Debtor will continue to
operate the Debtor’s business. The Debtor believes cash flow from
the continued operation of its business will be sufficient to meet
required Plan Payments.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement dated
January 23, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/qw5l3da from
PacerMonitor at no charge.

The Debtors are represented by:

        Aldo G. Bartolone, Jr., Esq.
        Bartolone Law, PLLC
        1030 N. Orange Ave., Suite 300
        Orlando, Florida 32801
        Telephone: 407-294-4440
        Facsimile: 407-287-5544
        E-mail: aldo@bartolonelaw.com

                About B&T Global Logistics

B&T Global Logistics, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-05034) on July 31,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.
Bartolone Law, PLLC, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


B. & J. PROPERTY: Court Confirms Reorganization Plan
----------------------------------------------------
On Dec. 12, 2019, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Oregon convened a hearing for confirmation of the Amended Joint
Plan of Reorganization of Debtors B. & J. Property Investments,
Inc., and William J. Berman as modified by the memorandum in
support of confirmation of Debtors’ Plan of Reorganization and
notice of Plan modification.

On Jan. 21, 2020, Judge Peter C. McKittrick ordered that:

  * The Plan, as modified by the amendments described herein, is
confirmed in all respects pursuant to Section 1129 of the
Bankruptcy Code.

  * The first paragraph of Section 7.7 shall be amended with the
additions: "Additionally, for the 5-year period following the
Effective Date, Berman shall deposit into the Berman Unsecured
Claims Fund all after-tax (1) salary or (2) other distributions he
receives from William Lloyd Developments, Inc. Berman will not take
any action to defer any compensation due to him from Lloyd, and
will be compensated from Lloyd in the same manner and frequency
that he was paid prior to the Petition Date, recognizing that
Berman is not paid a regular salary, but is only paid based on work
performed."

  * A new Section 7.8 shall be added to the Plan, to read as
follows:
"Debtors shall obtain an agreement from Lloyd to the effect that
the debt(s) owed to B&J and any other creditors shall be paid
current prior to making profit distributions/dividends to Lloyd's
shareholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lloyd may continue
paying employees, including shareholders, for work performed."

  * A new Section 7.9 shall be added to the Plan, to read as
follows:
"Berman shall report to the Class Action Claimants, at least
annually, that he is in compliance with his obligations to make
deposits to the Berman Unsecured Claims Fund as required by the
Plan."

  * All actions contemplated by the Plan are authorized and
approved in all respects, subject to the provisions of the Plan.
The Debtors, and their agents and officers, are hereby authorized
and directed to take all actions, and enter into and execute all
documents, reasonably necessary or appropriate to effectuate the
Plan and to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Order Confirming Plan dated Jan. 21, 2020,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/ux5drhz from PacerMonitor at no
charge.

The Debtors are represented by:

         MOTSCHENBACHER & BLATTNER LLP
         Nicholas J. Henderson
         E-mail: nhenderson@portlaw.com
         117 SW Taylor Street, Suite 300
         Portland, Oregon 97204-3029
         Tel: (503) 417-0500
         Fax: (503) 417-0501

                  - and -

         TONKON TORP LLP
         Timothy J. Conway
         1600 Pioneer Tower
         888 S.W. Fifth Avenue
         Portland, OR 97204
         Telephone: (503) 802-2027
         Facsimile: (503) 972-3727
         E-mail: tim.conway@tonkon.com

               About B. & J. Property Investments

B. & J. Property Investments, Inc., is a privately held company
engaged in commercial and industrial machinery and equipment rental
and leasing.

B. & J. Property Investments filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Ore. Case No. 19-60138) on Jan. 17, 2019.  In the petition signed
by William Berman, president, the Debtor disclosed assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.  

On Jan. 28, 2019, William J. Berman filed a voluntary petition
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The cases are assigned to Judge Peter C. McKittrick.   

TONKON TORP LLP is counsel to B. & J. Property Investments.
Nicholas J. Henderson of MOTSCHENBACHER & BLATTNER, LLP is counsel
to Mr. Berman.


BAYPORT CORPORATION: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Bayport Corporation Ltd.
        303-D Beltline Place S.W.
        Decatur, AL 35603

Business Description: Bayport Corporation Ltd. is a privately held
                      company engaged in activities related to
                      real estate.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 13, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Alabama

Case No.: 20-80471

Debtor's Counsel: Tazewell T. Shepard, esq.
                  PARKMAN, SHEPARD & MORRIS, P.C.
                  303 Williams Avenue, Suite 1411
                  Huntsville, AL 35801
                  Tel: 256-512-9924
                  E-mail: taze@ssmattorneys.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Rex Rankin, owner.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

                       https://is.gd/nhvAsH


BENBOW VALLEY: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to March 24
-------------------------------------------------------------
Benbow Valley Investments asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of California to extend the exclusive periods
during which it can file a Chapter 11 plan and solicit acceptances
for the plan to March 24 and May 11, respectively.

The requested extension of the exclusivity periods, if granted
would allow sufficient time for Benbow Valley to proceed through
the disclosure statement and plan confirmation process and to make
any necessary modifications or amendments thereto without the
distraction and expense of a competing plan.

Benbow Valley and its secured creditor, SA Group Properties, Inc.
have made progress towards resolving their dispute and continue to
work towards a mutual resolution. The companies were engaged in
mediation with Judge Roger L. Efremsky and Benbow Valley has agreed
to retain Trigild Incorporated as its chief restructuring officer
to aid in those efforts. There is a conference and mediation
scheduled for Feb. 17 where the parties will engage in further
discussions with the aid of Trigild's input.

                  About Benbow Valley Investments

Benbow Valley Investments -- https://benbowinn.com/ -- owns Benbow
Historic Inn, a historical hotel in Humboldt County. The hotel
opened to the public in July 1926 and soon became a popular
destination resort for motoring tourists traveling up the newly
completed Redwood Highway.  Benbow Historic Inn is on the National
Register of Historic Places and a member of Historic Hotels of
America.

Benbow Valley Investments sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10720) on Sept. 26,
2019.  The petition was signed by John Porter, managing partner. At
the time of the filing, Benbow Valley disclosed $17,424,402 in
total assets and $11,851,004 in total debt.  

Judge William J. Lafferty oversees the case.  Benbow Valley tapped
Chris D. Kuhner, Esq., at Kornfield, Nyberg, Bendes, Kuhner &
Little P.C., as its legal counsel.


BIKRAM'S YOGA: Trustee's Sherriff's Sale of Collector Cars Approved
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Deborah J. Saltzman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California authorized Robbin L. Itkin, Chapter
11 trustee for Bikram's Yoga College of India LP and affiliates, to
sell the Collector Cars listed on Schedule 1, owned or to be
purchased through the Sheriff's Sale Process, by BYCOI.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Jan. 21, 2020 at 11:30 a.m.

The sale is free and clear of any and all liens, claims,
liabilities, encumbrances and interests.

The Trustee is directed to file a notice of completion of Sheriff's
Sale setting out which of the Collector Cars she purchased and
providing that the sale of such cars will be governed by the
Agreement and Auction Procedures.

Upon the conclusion of the Sheriff's Sale, the Trustee is
authorized to retain and compensate RM Auctions, Inc., affiliated
with RM Sotheby's as auctioneer and sales agent for the Collector
Cars pursuant to the terms set forth in the Agreement.  RM's
retention and payment is approved pursuant to the terms of the
Agreement.

The Trustee is authorized to take any and all steps, including
advancing costs associated with the Auction of the Collector Cars,
reasonably necessary to effectuate the Auction and related
transactions.

The Trustee is authorized to take any and all steps reasonably
necessary to effectuate the titling of the Collector Cars in the
name of BYCOI or the name of the buyer at Auction, including
correcting the vehicle identification numbers on any documents
related to any of the Collector Cars or modifying the car
descriptions or other information as necessary for accuracy or
consistency as may be required for title to be issued.

RM is directed to prepare a summary of the Auction, and the Trustee
is directed to file the Auction Summary with the Court.

After the filing of the Auction Summary, RM is authorized to be
paid from proceeds of the sale of the Collector Cars at the Auction
in accordance with the Agreement without filing a fee application
or other documentation.

The 14--day stay provided by Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) is waived.

                     About Bikram's Yoga

Indian yoga guru Bikram Choudhury founded Bikram Choudhury Yoga,
the studio that popularized doing yoga in sauna heat.  Choudhury
built a worldwide following with 26 yoga postures, known as Bikram
Yoga, in rooms heated to 105 degrees Fahrenheit.

Bikram's Yoga College of India, and related entities Bikram
Choudhury Yoga Inc., Bikram Inc., Yuz Inc., and Int'l Trading
Representative sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Lead
Case No. 17-12045) on Nov. 9, 2017 after being dogged by $16.7
million in legal judgments.

Mr. Choudhury is facing allegations and lawsuits of sexual
misconduct by a number of his yoga practitioners, students,
instructors and teacher trainees.  The yoga guru has denied
wrongdoing but has fled the U.S. after a warrant has been issued
for his arrest in May.  A warrant for his arrest was issued for his
arrest after he failed to pay a judgment awarded to Minakshi
Jafa-Bodden, his former legal counsel.

Bikram's Yoga College of India estimated under $100,000 in assets.

Bikram Choudhury Yoga Inc. estimated under $50,000 in assets.
Bikram Inc. estimated under $1 million in assets.  Yuz Inc.
estimated under $100,000 in assets.  Int'l Trading Representative
listed under $500,000 in assets.  The Debtors, other than Int'l
Trading, estimated under $50 million in estimated liabilities.
Int'l Trading said its liabilities are under $500,000.

The Chapter 11 petitions were signed by John A. Bryan, Jr., as CEO.
An Oct. 15, 2017 document attached to the petition showed that Mr.
Choudhury, general partner, appointed Mr. Bryan as CEO and Chief
Restructuring Officer.  Mr. Bryan is the CEO of restructuring firm
The Watley Group, LLC.

The case judge is Hon. Deborah J. Saltzman.  

Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP serves as counsel to the
Debtors.  The Watley Group is the restructuring advisor.

Robbin Itkin was appointed Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor on
April 4, 2018.  The trustee hired DLA Piper LLP (US) as her legal
counsel.


BLUE DOG: Court Confirms Amended Plan of Liquidation
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor Blue Dog at 399 Inc. filed with the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York the Second Amended Plan
of Liquidation Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code, dated as of Jan. 9, 2020, and the Amended
Disclosure Statement with Respect to Chapter 11 Plan of
Liquidation.

On Jan. 23, 2020, Judge Michael E. Wiles ordered that:

  * The Disclosure Statement contains adequate information within
the meaning of Section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code and is approved.


  * The Plan and each of its provisions are approved and confirmed
under Section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code.  The terms of the Plan
and the Plan Supplements, each as may be modified consistent with
this Confirmation Order, are incorporated by reference into and are
an integral part of the Plan and this Confirmation Order.

  * The documents contained in the Plan Supplements and any
amendments, modifications, and supplements thereto, and all
documents and agreements introduced into evidence by the Debtor at
the Combined Hearing and the execution, delivery, and performance
thereof by the Debtor, are authorized and approved.

  * The modifications to the Plan, including, without limitation,
the modifications to the Plan and the Plan Supplements since the
commencement of solicitation and the modifications set forth in
this Order, constitute technical changes and do not materially
adversely affect or change the treatment of any Claims.

  * On the Effective Date, any and all Trust Assets shall be
preserved and shall be transferred to and vest in the Liquidating
Trust free and clear of all Liens, Claims, Interests, and
encumbrances as provided in the Plan and the Liquidating Trust
Agreement.

  * The Debtor and the Liquidating Trustee as applicable, and their
respective agents, attorneys, and accountants are authorized and
empowered from and after the date hereof to negotiate, execute,
issue, deliver, implement, file, or record any contract,
instrument, release, or other agreement or document related to the
Plan.

A full-text copy of the Order dated Jan. 23, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/uwo7sxl from PacerMonitor at no charge.

                     About Blue Dog at 399

Blue Dog at 399 Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case No. 15-10694) on March 24, 2015.  In the petition signed by
Elizabeth Slavutsky, sole director and shareholder, the Debtor was
estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in assets and
liabilities.


BODY TRANSIT: Selling All North Coventry Assets for $243K
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Eric L. Frank of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania approved the request of Body Transit,
Inc., doing business as Rascal Fitness, for an expedited hearing on
its sale of substantially all of its physical assets located at the
Suburbia Shopping Center with an address of 54-58 Glocker Way,
North Coventry Township, Pottstown, Pennsylvania, including the
equipment, inventory and customer lists, but not the Rascal's
Fitness name or the Rascal's Fitness reputation and good will, to
James Shaw or one of his soon to be formed entities for $243,000,
free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances and interests.

The Debtor is a Pennsylvania corporation in the business of
operating three health and fitness clubs in Montgomery County,
Pennsylvania.  The North Coventry Location is owned by Suburbia
Shopping Center, L.P. and managed by Gambone Management Co.

A hearing to consider the Motion is scheduled on Feb. 5, 2020, at
11:00 a.m.

The Movant will serve the Motion and the Order on the U.S. Trustee,
all secured creditors, all priority creditors and the Clerk's
Service List by overnight mail, facsimile transmission or e-mail
transmission no later than 5:00 p.m. on Jan. 29, 2020.  Service
under this Paragraph is effective if made to each party identified
through the Court's CM/ECF system.

The Movant will serve the Order and the Motion the creditors
holding the 20 largest unsecured claims by regular mail no later
than 5:00 p.m. on Jan. 29, 2020.

The Movant will file a Certification of Service as required by
Local Rule 9014-4.

                      About Body Transit

Body Transit, Inc., d/b/a Rascals Fitness, is a locally owned and
operated fitness center offering gym memberships.  Rascals Fitness
offers sports-specific training for youth and specializes in
goal-oriented fitness, such as weight loss and toning.  Marc
Polignano founded the company in 2007.

The company filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No.
20-10014) on Jan. 2, 2020.  In the petition signed by Marc
Polignano, president, the Debtor was estimated to have between
$50,000 and $100,000 in assets, and between $10 million and $50
million in liabilities.  Judge Eric L. Frank is assigned to the
case.  Center City Law Offices, LLC, serves as the Debtor's
counsel.



BOURDOW CONTRACTING: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to Feb. 29
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bourdow Contracting LLC asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Michigan to extend the exclusive period and
deadline to file a Chapter 11 plan and disclosure statement to Feb.
29.

The requested extension of the exclusivity period, if granted,
would allow the company to determine and negotiate the terms of the
plan with its creditors, especially the trustees for the Operating
Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund.

                     About Bourdow Contracting

Bourdow Contracting, LLC, a construction company based in Bay City,
Mich., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 19-20683) on April 3, 2019. The
petition was signed by Jason A. Bourdow, managing member. At the
time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$500,000 and liabilities of between $1 million and $10 million. The
case is assigned to Judge Daniel S. Opperman.  Warner Norcross &
Judd, LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


BROWNLEE FARM: Unsecureds to Get Net Proceeds After Secureds
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Brownlee Farm Center, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Valdosta Division, a Plan
of Reorganization and a Disclosure Statement.

Each Holder of an Allowed Unsecured Deficiency Claim in Class 6
will be paid by the Disbursing Agent, on the Effective Date and in
tandem with payments to Holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims in
Class 7, its pro rata share of the Net Proceeds of Debtor's estate
remaining following payment of Allowed Claims in Classes 1 – 5
and 7 in full as provided by this Plan.

The Allowed Unsecured Claims of General Unsecured Creditors (other
than Allowed Unsecured Claims included in Classes 6 and 8) (the
"Class 7 Unsecured Claims") are estimated to total $528,870.68 as
of the Confirmation Date.  Each Holder of an Allowed Unsecured
Deficiency Claim in Class 7 and Allowed Unsecured Deficiency Claim
in Class 6 will be paid by the Disbursing Agent on the Effective
Date its Prorata share of the Net Proceeds of Debtor's estate.

Class 8 Allowed Unsecured Administrative Convenience Class Claims
of $500 or Less are Impaired.  The Allowed Unsecured Administrative
Convenience Class Claims of $500.00 or Less are estimated to total
approximately $2,400.  The Debtor shall satisfy such Allowed Class
8 Claims by paying such Claims in full within 14 days after the
Effective Date.

Class 9 consists of the equity interests in the Debtor. The holders
of equity interests in the Debtor will receive nor retain any
property under this Plan and such equity interests shall be
surrendered and cancelled on the Debtors books upon the Final
Distribution Date.

The funds required for implementation of the Plan and the
distributions thereunder will be provided from of sales or other
dispositions of the Assets of the Debtor.  The Plan will be
administered by the Liquidating Agent, a licensed real estate
broker, the Disbursing Agent, a third-party fiduciary who will be
in charge of collecting and distributing Net Proceeds of the Sale
of Assets under the Plan, and the Reorganized Debtor, who shall
continue to manage the Assets until their sale and implement the
sales arranged by the Liquidating Agent.

The liquidation of Assets called for under the Plan will be
administered by the Liquidating Agent, a licensed real estate
broker, who will market and sell the Assets designated to be
liquidated under the Plan that have not sold by the Confirmation
Date.  The Liquidating Agent shall be Kim Brownlee Meeks, who has
already been approved as a broker in its Case.  Ms. Meeks will
market the Assets, procure contracts for their sale, subject to
approval of the Debtor, and will arrange the Closings of the sale
and payment of the Net Proceeds to the Disbursing Agent, for which
services he will be compensated at each Closing at the rates
heretofore approved for Ms. Meeks in its case.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Jan. 23, 2020,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/rynoldy from PacerMonitor at no
charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

       Ward Stone, Jr.
       G. Daniel Taylor
       Stone & Baxter, LLP
       Suite 800, 577 Mulberry Street
       Macon, Georgia 31201

                       About Brownlee Farm

Brownlee Farm Center, Inc. and Gypsum Supply Company, Inc. buy and
sell various agricultural products, principally gypsum and
fertilizer, from and to dealers in Georgia, Florida, and Alabama.
They are also engaged in the building rental business.  

Brownlee Farm Center and Gypsum Supply filed voluntary Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Lead Case No. 18-71300) on Oct. 29,
2018.  At the time of the filing, each Debtor had estimated assets
of less than $1 million and liabilities of between $1 million and
$10 million.   

Ward Stone, Jr., Esq., at Stone & Baxter, LLP, represents the
Debtors.   


BUMBLE BEE: $931M Sale of Company Assets to Tonos Approved
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware has entered a supplemental order approving
the Stalking Horse Agreement and the sale to Tonos 1 Operating
Corp., Tonos US LLC and Melissi 4, Inc. of substantially all of the
assets of Bumble Bee Parent, Inc. and its affiliates' Canadian
affiliates, as well as equity interests in certain non-Debtor
affiliates whose operations support the Debtors' U.S. business.,
for a purchase price of up to $930.6 million.

The Sale Hearing was conducted on Jan. 23, 2020.

Effective as of the Closing Date, the Debtors are authorized to and
will assume all insurance policies issued by ACE American Insurance
Co., Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Co., ACE Property and
Casualty Insurance Co., Illinois Union Insurance Co., Federal
Insurance Co. and Vigilant Insurance Co. ("Chubb") to (or providing
coverage to) one or more of the Debtors and/or their predecessors
at any time and all programs, collateral and security, claims
servicing and other agreements related thereto ("Chubb Insurance
Contracts").

Effective as of the Closing Date, the Debtors are authorized to and
will assign the Chubb Insurance Contracts to the Buyer and to enter
into an assumption agreement by and among the Debtors, the Buyer,
and Chubb with respect to such assignment.

The Chubb Assumption Agreement will provide, among other things,
that (i) the rights and interests of the Debtors in the Insurance
Programs and the Collateral will be transferred and assigned to the
Buyer, and all right, title and interest of the Debtors in the
Insurance Programs and the Collateral will terminate, and (ii) the
right, if any, to any return premiums, loss payments, expense
adjustments, return of paid loss deposit funds, and other benefits
under the Insurance Programs will belong to the Buyer, and not to
the Debtors.

Effective as of the Closing Date, the Chubb Insurance Contracts
will be deemed to be Purchased Assets and Assumed Contracts.

Except to the extent specifically addressed in Supplemental Sale
Order or in the Chubb Assumption Agreement (once effective in
accordance with its terms), nothing will amend, modify or otherwise
alter the terms and conditions of the Chubb Insurance Contracts.

The Supplemental Sale Order is entered pursuant to paragraph 52 of
the Sale Order.  

Notwithstanding the applicability of Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and
6006(d), and in accordance with paragraph 33 of the Sale Order, the
terms and conditions of the Supplemental Sale Order will be
immediately effective and enforceable upon its entry.   

The Debtors are authorized to take all actions necessary to
effectuate the relief granted pursuant to the Supplemental Sale
Order.

                      About Bumble Bee Foods

Bumble Bee -- https://www.bumblebee.com/ -- is a health and
wellness focused company with a full line of seafood and specialty
protein products marketed under certain brands including Bumble
Bee(R), Brunswick, Snow's(R), Wild Selections(R) and Beach
Cliff(R).

Canadian affiliate, Connors Bros. Clover Leaf Seafoods Company --
http://www.cloverleaf.ca-- is a supplier of shelf-stable seafood,

producing and marketing its products under several brands,
including Clover Leaf(R), Brunswick(R) and Wild Selections(R).
CBCLS's international business distributes products under the
Brunswick(R) Bumble Bee(R) and Beach Cliff(R) brands to over 40
markets and countries, including Barbados, Jamaica, and Trinidad &
Tobago.

San Diego, California-based Bumble Bee Parent, Inc., and four
affiliates filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 19-12502) on Nov. 21, 2019, before the Hon. Laurie Selber
Silverstein.  Bumble Bee Parent estimated $50 million to $100
million in assets and $500 million to $1 billion in liabilities.
The petitions were signed by Kent McNeil, vice president.

Attorneys at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP, led by
Alan W. Kornberg, Esq., Kelley A. Cornish, Esq., Claudia R. Tobler,
Esq., and Aaron J. David, Esq., serve as counsel to the Debtors.
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP, led by Pauline K. Morgan,
Esq., Ryan M. Bartley, Esq., and Ashley E. Jacobs, Esq., serves as
co-counsel.

The Debtors tapped AlixPartners, LLP as restructuring advisor;
Houlihan Lokey, Inc. as investment banker; and Prime Clerk as
notice, claims, solicitation and balloting agent.

Counsel to affiliates of FCF Co., Ltd., the proposed Stalking Horse
Bidder is:

     Sanford Rosen, Esq.
     Rosen & Associates, P.C.
     747 Third Avenue
     New York, NY 10017

Counsel to the ABL Agent and ABL DIP Agent are:

     Peter S. Burke, Esq.
     Paul Hastings LLP
     515 S. Flower St., 25th Floor
     Los Angeles, CA 90071

          - and -

     Andrew V. Tenzer, Esq.
     Michael E. Comerford, Esq.
     Paul Hastings LLP
     200 Park Avenue
     New York, NY 10166

          - and -

     Matthew P. Ward, Esq.
     Morgan L. Patterson, Esq.
     Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
     1313 North Market Street, Suite 1200
     Wilmington, DE 19801

Counsel to the Term Loan Agent and Term Loan DIP Agent:

     Matthew S. Barr, Esq.
     David N. Griffiths, Esq.
     Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
     767 Fifth Avenue
     New York, NY 10153

           - and -

     Paul N. Heath, Esq.
     Zachary I. Shapiro, Esq.
     Richards, Layton & Finger PA, 920
     N. King Street
     Wilmington, DE 19801

The CCAA Monitor is:

     Josh Nevsky
     Alvarez & Marsal Canada Inc.
     200 Bay Street, Suite 2900
     Royal Bank South Tower
     Toronto ON M5J 2J1


BYRON DAVID: Court Narrows Summit Community Bank's Claims
----------------------------------------------------------
Byron David learned of financial irregularities committed by his
wife, Lisa, but she shot herself and died before the confrontation.
Mrs. David handled all household finances from the couple's
marriage in 1991 until 2012.  She served as the bookkeeper for Mr.
David's company, Blue Ridge Technical Services, Inc., and was part
owner of David-Cantrall and Associates, Inc., a real estate
investment company, along with her partners Wesley and John
Cantrall and Michael Firetti.  

More discrepancies in the Davids' personal and business financial
affairs were uncovered after Mrs. David's death.  Summit Community
Bank had loaned over $3 million to Mrs. David and her partners from
2005 to 2012.  Apparently, she embezzled more than $3 million to
pay Summit and other creditors that caused Blue Ridge to have an
empty checking account. She forged her husband's signature and the
signatures of the Woolfrey couple (Kenneth Woolfrey was David's
partner at Blue Ridge).  She misappropriated $2,812,202.81 in
company funds, failed to file business tax returns, failed to pay
employee 401(k) accounts, and skimmed from accounts receivables.
Also, hundreds of other suspicious documents were discovered in
Mrs. David's home office. Some documents had been shredded and
others had been altered by cutting and pasting or taping, including
receipts and various loan documents. Included were altered
documents related to Blue Ridge and altered Internal Revenue
Service documents.

Summit foreclosed on David-Cantrall's properties under deeds of
trust, including the Davids' personal residence.  Summit sued Mr.
David for the deficiencies due on the promissory notes for the
loans.

Mr. David sought Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection on July 10, 2018.
On April 10, 2019, the Court granted Mr. David's Motion to Convert
his Chapter 7 case to a Chapter 11 case.

Summit filed five proofs of claim for the deficiencies based on the
personal guarantees attached to the proofs of claim. Mr. David
argues he is not aware of the personal guarantees bearing his
signature and asks the Bankruptcy Court to disallow all of Summit's
claims in their entirety.

In a Jan. 27, 2020 Memorandum Opinion, the Court overrules Mr.
David's Objection to Claim 4-3 and sustains his Objections to
Claims 3-3, 5-3, 6-3 and 7-3.

The Court finds that Claim 4-3 is a valid claim against Mr. David's
estate as he admitted or confirmed on at least three occasions that
he executed Exhibit 4. This is his guarantee for loan number 358003
supporting Claim 4-3. He therefore cannot claim that this guarantee
is a forgery.

With respect to Claims 3-3, 5-3, 6-3 and 7-3, the Court says it is
not persuaded it should rely on a determination that "in all
probability" Mr. David penned any of the four signatures that
appear on the photocopied guarantees supporting these claims. Nor
will the Court assume that any of the photocopied guarantees are
genuine copies of original documents signed by Mr. David merely
because each signature appears to be acknowledged by a notary. The
Court says the acknowledgements were not examined by forensic
experts and some show clear signs of fabrication.  According to the
Court, Summit failed to produce evidence sufficient to prove the
photocopied guarantees supporting these claims were genuine copies
of original documents signed by Mr. David.

The Court concludes that the documents supporting these claims are
not genuine.  The Court notes that Mr. David's wife had a history
of committing forgery and fraud, and had the opportunity, means and
motivation to forge Mr. David's signature on the guarantees
supporting claims 3-3, 5-3, 6-3 and 7-3.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at https://is.gd/Vz483c
from Leagle.com.

The bankruptcy case is, In re: BYRON DAVID, Chapter 11, Debtor,
Case No. 18-12396-KHK (Bankr. E.D. Va.).  The Debtor is represented
by:

     James P. Campbell, Esq.
     CAMPBELL FLANNERY, P.C.
     1602 Village Market Blvd SE #225
     Leesburg, VA 20175
     E-mail: JCampbell@CampbellFlannery.com



CEL-SCI CORPORATION: Reports $5.5-Mil. Net Loss for First Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CEL-SCI Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
available to common shareholders of $5.47 million on $35,506 of
grant income for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2019, compared to
net income available to common shareholders of $1.24 million on
$126,414 of grant income for the same period in 2018.

As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had $29.51 million in total
assets, $22.54 million in total liabilities, and $6.97 million in
total stockholders' equity.

During the three months ended Dec. 31, 2019, research and
development expenses increased by approximately $0.7 million, or
21%, compared to the three months ended Dec. 31, 2018.  Major
components of this increase include approximately $0.7 million of
cost incurred preparing the manufacturing facility for the
potential commercial manufacture of Multikine, $0.5 million
increase in employee stock option expense and $0.2 million increase
in depreciation expense on the manufacturing facility as a result
of adopting the new leasing standard.  These increases were offset
by a decrease of approximately $0.7 million in expenses related to
the Company's on-going Phase 3 clinical trial.

During the three months ended Dec. 31, 2019, general and
administrative expenses increased by approximately $0.9 million, or
56%, compared to the three months ended Dec. 31, 2018.
Approximately $0.7 million of the change relates to an increase in
employee stock compensation expense.  The remaining increase
consists of approximately $0.2 million in net other general and
administrative account variations.

The gains on derivative instruments of approximately $0.8 million
and $5.6 million for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively, were the result of the change in fair value of the
derivative liabilities during the respective quarters. These
changes were caused mainly by fluctuation in the share price of the
Company's common stock.

Net interest expense decreased by approximately $0.2 million for
the three months ended Dec. 31, 2019 compared to the three months
ended Dec. 31, 2018.  The decrease is due to a decrease in interest
rates on the Company's finance leases that were re-measured in
connection with the adoption of ASC 842, Leases.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                        https://is.gd/mUx2KI

                    About CEL-SCI Corporation

CEL-SCI Corporation (CEL-SCI) is a clinical-stage biotechnology
company focused on finding the best way to activate the immune
system to fight cancer and infectious diseases.  The Company's lead
investigational therapy Multikine is currently in a pivotal Phase 3
clinical trial involving head and neck cancer, for which the
Company has received Orphan Drug Status from the FDA.  The Company
has operations in Vienna, Virginia, and near Baltimore, Maryland.

The Company reported a net loss of $22.13 million for the year
ended Sept. 30, 2019, compared to a net loss of $31.84 million for
the year ended Sept. 30, 2018.

BDO USA, LLP, in Potomac, Maryland, the Company's auditor since
2005, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
Dec. 16, 2019, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and expects to incur substantial losses for
the forseeable future that raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.


CHARLENE CORP: Plan Payments to be Funded by Francis Xavier Whelan
------------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Charlene Corporation, Inc., filed a First Amended Disclosure
Statement for its proposed Plan of Reorganization.

The Debtor has a claim against Oanh Thi Nguyen in the sum of
$500,000. Prior to the commencement of this case, Debtor, through
counsel Thai Nguyen,had filed suit against Oanh Thi Nguyen in Case
No. 470429-V in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, MD.  The
claim is based on Debtor-In-Possession's claim that Oanh Thi Nguyen
wrongfully removed property of the Debtor-In-Possession from the
place of business (prepetition).  On Jan. 3, 2020, the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland granted Debtor's
motion to request that the Court allow Debtor to retain counsel Tai
Nguyen, Esq., to represent the Corporation in that matter.  The
payment to the creditor(s) in this case is not dependent on
Debtor's success in Debtor-In- Possession's success in the
aforementioned Case No. 470429-V.

Upon completion of the payment to Oanh Thi Nguyen, the the Debtor
will have effectively waived its appeal previously filed in Case
No. 470429-V in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, MD.

Under the Plan, general unsecured claims in Class 3, comprised of
$157,500 Judgment held by Oanh Nguyen, will be paid 100% of allowed
claim after satisfaction of Administrative Expenses and the Claims
of Creditors holding Claims in Classes I and II, if any.
Distribution to the Class shall be made upon approval of Debtor's
Motion To Secure Unsecured financing filed on Jan. 9, 2020.  A
hearing on said motion was scheduled for Feb. 10, 2020.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
Debtor's financing from the sole stockholder's husband, Francis
Xavier Whelan.  Said funds have been transferred to undersigned
counsel, who is holding said funds in his trust account pending
further order of the Bankruptcy Court.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated Jan. 23,
2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/wrv5l5l from PacerMonitor
at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

         Michael S. Woll
         4405 East West Hwy., No. 201
         Bethesda, MD 20814
         E-mail: michaelswoll@wolllaw.com

                  About Charlene Corporation

Charlene Corporation is in the retail business of gold and jewelry
sales, and operates its business exclusively within leased space
located at the Langley Park Plaza Shopping Center, 7923 New
Hampshire Ave., Hyattsville, MD20783. It is solely owned by Ms.
Xuan Hoang T. Nguyen, (Ms. Nguyen) who has solely owned the
business since 2015.

Based in Hyattsville, Maryland, Charlene Corporation sought Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 19-22991) on Sept. 30, 2019,
listing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  Michael
S. Woll, Esq. at Woll & Woll, P.A., represents the Debtor.  


CHOICE ONE: March 12 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------
Judge Gregory L. Taddonio has ordered that the hearing to consider
approval of the disclosure statement filed by Choice One Staffing
Group, Inc. fka First Choice Staffing Group, Inc. will be held at
the following place and time: 3/12/20 at 02:30 PM Courtroom A, 54th
Floor, U.S. Steel Tower, 600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15219.

The last date to file and serve written objections to the
disclosure statement is fixed as March 10, 2020.

The Order extends the time periods provided under 11 U.S.C. Section
1129(e) through May 31, 2020.

                About Choice One Staffing Group

Township, Pennsylvania-based Choice One Staffing Group, Inc. --
https://choice1staffing.com/ -- is a full-service staffing firm
that
assists businesses in filling their administrative, light
industrial, technical, medical, and hospitality employment needs.
It works on both the local and national level.

Choice One Staffing Group sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 19-21455) on April 9,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of less than $1 million and liabilities of between $1 million and
$10 million.  

The case is assigned to Judge Gregory L. Taddonio.  

The Debtor is represented by Knox McLaughlin Gornall & Sennett,
P.C.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's bankruptcy case.


CINEMARK HOLDINGS: Fitch Assigns First-Time BB- IDR, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'BB-' Issuer-Default Rating to
Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Cinemark
USA, Inc. Fitch has also assigned a 'BB+'/'RR1' to the Cinemark USA
secured revolver and secured term loan and a 'BB-'/'RR4' to the
senior unsecured notes. The Rating Outlook is Stable.

The ratings reflect the company's scale and market position as the
third largest U.S. theatrical exhibitor and its leading presence in
Latin American territories, the company's relatively conservative
financial profile with total leverage, as measure as total debt
with equity credit to operating EBITDA of 2.5x (4.4x including
lease equivalent debt), and improving FCF profile. The ratings also
incorporate a degree of operating volatility given Cinemark's
reliance on film studio content and the high fixed cost structure
of the business. Fitch expects credit metrics could be stronger
during periods of good box office performance to provide some
cushion during poor performing box office cycles.

Cinemark was an early adopter for upgrading its theatres to
recliner seating and expanding its array of food and beverage
offerings. The company has upgraded an estimated 60% of its
domestic seating to recliners as of YE 2019. Additionally, 75% of
its theatres have expanded food and beverage menus and 50% allow
for the sale of alcohol. This has enabled Cinemark to outperform
and expand per patron spending. Notably, concession spending per
patron reached $5.22 as of third quarter 2019 representing high
single digit growth yoy (and up from $4.76 per patron in 2018) and
leading theatre exhibitor peers. Given the preponderance of the
domestic circuit with recliner seating, Fitch expects capital
spending will level off over the rating horizon providing for
improved FCF generation. Cinemark generated $146 million in FCF for
LTM Sept. 30, 2019, up from roughly $50 million for YE 2018.

The ratings also consider the inherent hit-driven volatility of the
film industry and Cinemark's lack of control regarding the quality
and quantity of films released in any given period. Notably, film
studios have become more reliant on tent-pole or bigger budget
franchise films which have a larger return potential but can
greatly impact performance in any given quarter. Fitch also
recognizes the increasing secular concerns related to theatrical
attendance with the emergence of a growing number of streaming
services with original television and film content (i.e. Netflix,
Amazon Prime Video, Hulu, and more recently AppleTV+, Disney+ and
the upcoming HBO Max and Peacock services). There is growing
uncertainty around film studios long-term commitment to the
theatrical exhibition model as these players shift focus to their
direct-to-consumer offerings and seek to maximize subscriber growth
and relevance in a shifting media ecosystem. However, Fitch notes
that the Walt Disney Company continues to outperform peers in
theatrical exhibition, accounting for roughly 40% of the 2019 U.S.
box office. Fitch does not anticipate any meaningful change to
theatrical windows over the near term particularly for larger film
offerings.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Key Promotion Window for Studios: Cinemark's ratings reflect
Fitch's belief that movie exhibition will continue to be a key
promotion window for the movie studios' biggest/most profitable
releases.

Scale and Market Position: Cinemark is the third largest theatre
exhibitor in the U.S. operating 344 theatres and 4,630 screens
across 41 states. The company also has a dominant position in Latin
American where it operates 204 theatres and 1,452 screens across 15
countries. Cinemark is the leading theatre exhibitor in Brazil and
Argentina, the second largest exhibitor in Chile, Colombia and
Peru. Cinemark generated $3.3 billion in revenues and $730 million
in Fitch-calculated operating EBITDA (representing a 21% margin)
for the LTM period ending Sept. 30, 2019.

Solid 2019 Box Office, More Uncertain 2020: The domestic industry
box office (U.S. and Canada) had an overall solid performance in
calendar year 2019, but performance was unable to match the
strength of 2018. Gross domestic industry box office of $11.3
billion, was down 4.8% yoy, but was still the third-highest
grossing box office of all time. Notable titles included,
'Avengers: Endgame' ($858 million domestic box office and a $2.8
billion record-breaking worldwide total), 'The Lion King' ($544
million domestic), 'Toy Story 4' ($434 million domestic) and
'Frozen II' ($430 million domestic). The Walt Disney Company
dominated with a strong slate of box office performers, accounting
for seven of the 10 top grossing films in calendar year 2019 (an
unprecedented outperformance). Other noteworthy titles included
'Joker' and 'It Chapter Two' from Warner Bros., 'Jumanji: The Next
Level' from Sony Pictures, 'Us' from Universal and 'John Wick
Chapter 3' from Lions Gate.

Fitch believes that box office performance in 2020 could look more
challenging owing to more untested and lesser-known content (e.g.
Disney Marvel offerings 'Black Widow' and 'Eternals' and newer
Pixar content with 'Onward' and 'Soul'). Higher profile titles
include 'The King's Man', 'Disney Mulan', 'No Time To Die', 'The
Fast and Furious 9', 'Wonder Woman 1984', 'Maverick (Top Gun)' and
'Tenet (Christopher Nolan)'. The long-awaited 'Avatar' sequel comes
to theatres in 2021. The 'Avatar' franchise is now owned by Disney
following the acquisition of Fox.

Cinemark's recent results have mirrored the strong underlying box
office. In third quarter 2019 (3Q19), Cinemark's domestic admission
revenues were up +5.3% yoy and outperformed the +3.5% yoy growth in
overall domestic box office. Domestic concession spending per
patron of $5.22 was up +9.7% on a yoy basis in 3Q19 and leads the
domestic peer group. The weighting towards family friendly, action
and horror content supported strong performance in the company's
Latin American territories. Incrementally, there was solid local
content (Nada a Perder 2 in Brazil). Latin American attendance was
up +11.9% in 3Q19.

Tough International Headwinds: Cinemark's operating performance in
Latin America (with largest concentration in Brazil) has been
negatively affected by economic difficulties (high unemployment)
and political uncertainty. Despite a 2019 film slate which
resonated with Latin American audiences, foreign currency headwinds
remain a drag on reported results. Fitch expects economic and
foreign currency headwinds to remain an overhang for Cinemark's
Latin American circuit over the rating horizon.

More Conservative Financial Profile: Cinemark's financial metrics
are strong compared to peers in the theatre exhibitor sector. Total
leverage and adjusted leverage (including lease equivalent debt)
approximated 2.5x and 4.4x, respectively for LTM Sept. 30, 2019.

Notching of Secured Leverage: The 'BB+'/'RR1' rating on the secured
debt is supported by the lower proportion of secured debt in the
capital structure, as evidenced by secured leverage of below 1x for
LTM Sept. 30, 2019. To the extent that secured debt becomes a
larger proportion of the capital structure as evidenced by secured
leverage approaching 1.5x, this could result in a downward revision
of the secured debt rating.

Theatre Upgrades Slow: Cinemark spent $287 million on capex for LTM
Sept. 30, 2019. With an estimated 60% of the company's domestic
theatre circuit upgraded at YE 2019, Fitch expects capex to level
off as the pace of upgrades is expected to slow going forward.
Fitch expects modest improvements to FCF over the rating horizon.

Liquidity: Cinemark generated $146 million in FCF for LTM Sept. 30,
2019, up from roughly $50 million for fiscal 2018. Liquidity was
also supported by $483 million in balance sheet cash and $100
million in revolver availability as of Sept. 30, 2019.

Movie Club Positive Driver: 'Movie Club' accounted for roughly 15%
of Cinemark's domestic box office sales in 3Q19 and has been
helping growth in concession spending per patron. Cinemark
introduced its 'Movie Club' subscription program in late 2017 to
help bolster attendance levels. Thus far, Movie Club membership has
grown to roughly 850K members (3Q19). The Movie Club program has
some unique attributes relative to competitor's theatre
subscription programs. Movie Club members can see one movie each
month but can rollover unused movie credits and receive a 20%
discount on food and beverage purchases. Subscribers can also
purchase additional movie tickets at their member price ($9 to $10
depending on locations).

Increasing Competitive Threats: The ratings factor in the
intermediate- to long-term risks associated with increased
competition from at-home entertainment media, limited control over
revenue trends, shrinking film distribution windows and increasing
indirect competition from other distribution channels (video on
demand, over the top and streaming services). For the long term,
Fitch continues to expect that the movie exhibitor industry will be
challenged in growing attendance, and any potential attendance
declines will offset some of the growth in average ticket prices
and concessions.

Muted Premium VOD Risk: Fitch does not anticipate any near-term
changes to the existing theatrical window (74 days exclusive
theatrical window until electronic sell-through and 90 days to
physical distribution). While a premium video on demand (PVOD)
window being introduced over the longer term is a possibility,
Fitch views it as less likely given larger film studios support for
the theatre exhibition window for larger budget films and
franchises due to branding opportunities. Notably, Disney continues
to capture an outsized portion of domestic box office receipts
(nearly 40% in calendar year 2019 and more than 2x the market share
of the next studio).

Fitch believes that a PVOD offering would most likely be more
suitable for lower-budget films with targeted demographics rather
than franchises. Also, Fitch believes it is more likely that
studios will need to negotiate with exhibitors, and a potential
revenue sharing agreement could help offset any declines in
attendance.

Dependent on Film Studios' Product: Cinemark and its peers rely on
the quality, quantity and timing of movie product, all of which are
factors out of management's control.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Cinemark's ratings reflect its scale and market position as the
third largest theatre chain in the U.S., and the largest theatre
chain in Brazil and Argentina, and the second largest theatre chain
in Colombia, Chile and Peru.

Fitch believes that Cinemark's credit metrics position the company
within the low-'BB' rating category. Cinemark is smaller in scale
than AMC Entertainment and Cineworld plc (B+/Stable). Cinemark also
is exposed to Latin America (approximately 25% of revenues), which
benefits from favorable demographics (growing and younger skewing
population), but Fitch expects the region to continue to face
economic uncertainty and foreign currency headwinds which will
weigh on reported results for that region. However, the ratings
also incorporate Cinemark's relatively more conservative financial
profile, solid margins and improving FCF generation. Cinemark's
total leverage, as defined as total debt with equity credit to
operating EBITDA, was 2.5x for LTM Sept. 30, 2019 (4.4x including
lease debt equivalent), while AMC Entertainment's total leverage
was 6.8x (7.4x including lease debt equivalent). Fitch estimates
that Cineworld's pro forma adjusted net leverage will peak at
approximately 6.0x (including lease adjusted debt) following the
company's acquisition of Cineplex. Cinemark has similar
profitability and cash flow margins as compared to Cineworld.

Cinemark's ratings are in-line with peers exposed to consumer
discretionary spending and consumer media peer's in Fitch's credit
opinion universe and publicly rated peers. Notably, MagicLab or
Buzz Merger Sub Ltd. (BB-/Stable), the second largest competitor in
the mobile and online dating industry, is similarly rated but has
lower adjusted leverage (3.4x on a pro forma basis), a stronger
growth profile and somewhat higher margins offset by smaller
relative scale. Cable operators, like Cablevision Systems
Corporation, are more highly levered (at 5.4x for LTM Sept. 30,
2019) but have a higher proportion of subscription-based revenues
that provide a greater degree of stability and visibility into cash
flows.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  -- 2019 revenues incorporate the following: (1) domestic industry
box office receipts down mid-single-digits yoy; (2) domestic
attendance levels down mid-single-digits yoy; and (3) domestic
average ticket prices up low single digits yoy reflecting mix shift
toward lower value tickets (i.e. less adult due to family friendly
heavy slate); (4) domestic concession per patron up
mid-single-digits yoy; (5) Fitch assumes that Cinemark's box office
performance outperforms industry by roughly 200bp; (6)
international revenues strong box office performance are offset by
foreign currency headwinds.

  -- 2020 revenues reflect Fitch's expectations for weaker film
slate owing to a mix of lesser known titles/content. Fitch
forecasts industry domestic box office revenues down
mid-single-digits yoy.

  -- Thereafter, Fitch assumes revenue growth in the flat to low
single digits range. Fitch notes that operating performance has
limited visibility past a one-year horizon and is highly dependent
on the quality and quantity of the studios' film slate. Notably,
2021 has the possibility of experiencing stronger performance with
the return of the next instalment in the 'Avatar' franchise.
  
  -- EBITDA margins in the low 20% range. EBITDA margins fluctuate
driven by top-line performance given the high degree of fixed
costs;

  -- Annual capex of roughly $285 million (consistent with LTM
Sept. 30, 2019 as domestic theatre upgrades slow and investment
shifts towards new builds);

  -- Debt pay down limited to scheduled amortizations. Assumes all
sizeable maturities are refinanced at maturity;

  -- Modest tuck-in acquisitions;

  -- Annual dividend of $1.36 per share (roughly $160 million for
full-year). Fitch models incremental dividend growth of roughly 5%
per year over the ratings horizon. Management is likely to return
improved FCF to shareholders in the absence of reinvestment
opportunities;

  -- Total leverage and adjusted leverage relatively flat over the
rating case at 2.5x and 4.4x, respectively.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- The ratings for Cinemark have limited upside potential due to
the inherent nature of the theatrical exhibition business, the
resulting hit-driven volatility and the reliance on film studios
for the quantity and quality of films in any given period. In
strong box office years, metrics may be stronger in order to
provide a cushion in weaker box office years.

-- Total leverage, as measured as total debt with equity credit to
operating EBITDA, below 2.0x on a sustained basis and adjusted
leverage (including lease equivalent debt) below 4.0x on a
sustained basis;

-- FCF margin sustained in the mid to high single digits.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- Total leverage above 3.0x and adjusted leverage above 5.0x;

  -- Deteriorating FCF;

  -- Increasing secular pressure as illustrated in sustained
declines in attendance and/or concession spending per patron.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Adequate Liquidity: Cinemark's liquidity was supported by $483
million in balance sheet cash and the $100 million revolver (no
borrowings outstanding at Sept. 30, 2019). Cinemark's FCF
generation has improved to $146 million in FCF for LTM Sept. 30,
2019, up from roughly $50 million for fiscal 2018. Fitch expects
capex to plateau from current levels as the company's pace of
recliner upgrades slow going forward. Cinemark has just modest
annual amortization on its term loan (quarterly principal payments
of $1.6 million) until it matures in March 2025. The next sizeable
maturity comes in 2022 when the $400 million 5.125% senior
unsecured notes mature. Cinemark has a 5.0x net senior secured
leverage ratio covenant if there are any borrowings outstanding
under the revolver. Fitch estimates ample cushion relative to this
covenant level over the rating case, although there are no revolver
borrowings currently.

Cinemark had $1.8 billion in total debt as of Sept. 30, 2019, which
included $648 million in outstanding term loan borrowings, $400
million in 5.125% senior unsecured notes due 2022 and $755 million
in 4.875% senior unsecured notes due 2023.

The senior secured credit facility is guaranteed by parent,
Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (downstream) and certain of Cinemark USA,
Inc.'s domestic subsidiaries (upstream). The credit facility is
secured by mortgages on certain fee and leasehold properties and
security interests in substantially all of Cinemark USA and
guarantor's personal property including a pledge on the capital
stock of certain Cinemark USA's domestic subsidiaries and 65% of
the voting stock of certain foreign subsidiaries.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG
credit relevance is a score of 3. ESG issues are credit neutral or
have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to
their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the
entity.


CLOVER TECHNOLOGIES: Dan Perez to Be CEO of Reorganized Clover
--------------------------------------------------------------
On Jan. 21, 2020, Clover Technologies Group, LLC, et al., filed an
amendment to the initial plan supplement filed Jan. 8, 2020, in
support of the Debtors' Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization.

The documents contained in the Plan Supplement are integral to,
part of, and incorporated by reference into the Plan

The Second Amended Plan Supplement includes the following
documents:

* Exhibit C - Take-Back Term Loan Credit Agreement

* Exhibit D - New Warrant Agreement

* Exhibit G - Restructuring Steps Memorandum

* Exhibit H - Identities of the Members of the Reorganized Clover
Board and the Officers of Reorganized Clover  

In accordance with the Plan, the Required Consenting Term Loan
Lenders have determined that the Reorganized Clover Board shall
consist of seven  members.  As of the date hereof, the following
five individuals have been selected to be directors on the
Reorganized Clover Board:   

   1. Mina Faltas
   2. Dan Fletcher
   3. Nick Ghoussaini
   4. Malcolm McRoberts
   5. Dan Perez

The remaining two directors will be selected in accordance with the
Restructuring Support Agreement and the New Organizational
Documents, as applicable

                        Board Members

Mina Faltas is the founder and Managing Member of Washington
Harbour Partners LP, an investment firm that manages public and
private debt and equity investments.  Prior to founding Washington
Harbour in 2019, Mr. Faltas was the co-founder, Managing Partner,
and Head of Research at  Nokota Management, a multi-billion dollar
multi-strategy investment fund.  Prior to Nokota Management, Mr.
Faltas was a Senior Investment Analyst at Viking Global Investors
from 2008 to 2011 and, before that, held several positions at
JPMorgan since 2000.  Mr. Faltas has a B.S. in Commerce (Finance)
from the University of Virginia and currently serves on the
Advisory Board of the McIntire School of Commerce.  Mr. Faltas
currently serves as a Senior Advisor to Diameter Capital Partners
and on the board of eSports holding company, aXiomatic.  

Dan Fletcher is a seasoned executive and certified public
accountant.  Mr. Fletcher is currently the Chief Financial Officer
of Host Analytics, an enterprise software leader, as well as an
Operating Partner within Vector Capital's Value Creation Team,
where he works alongside Vector's investment professionals in all
aspects of the private equity investment process and portfolio
company operations.  Prior to joining Vector, Mr. Fletcher was a
Manager for Alvarez & Marsal's Private Equity Services Division,
where he served in various interim management roles for portfolio
companies of large private equity firms.  Prior to Alvarez &
Marsal, Mr. Fletcher held various positions at Sterling Partners, a
private equity firm, Allstate Investments, and
PricewaterhouseCoopers.  Mr. Fletcher has a B.S. and Masters from
the University of Missouri.   

Nick Ghoussaini is the Head of Credit Strategies at Vector Capital.
Prior to joining Vector Capital in 2011, Mr. Ghoussaini was a
Senior Associate at Veritas Capital, a private equity firm.  Prior
to Veritas Capital, Mr. Ghoussaini was employed by Cypress Group
and was an analyst in the Industrials Group at Lehman Brothers.
Mr. Ghoussaini holds a B.A. in Economics and German from Tufts
University and an MBA from the Wharton School of Business of the
University of Pennsylvania.    

Malcolm McRoberts is an executive with more than 30 years of senior
management, operations, and technology experience.  Mr. McRoberts
is currently an Operating Partner within Vector Capital's Value
Creation Team, where he works alongside Vector's investment
professionals in all aspects of the private equity investment
process and portfolio company operations.  Prior to joining Vector
Capital, Mr. McRoberts held various roles within a number of public
companies where he established a track-record of developing,
leading, and executing technology solution business plans on both a
national and global scale.  Most recently, Mr. McRoberts was the
President of the Small Business Services Division of Deluxe Corp.
(a Fortune 500 company).  Prior to Deluxe, Mr. McRoberts held a
number of positions within NCR Corp., Merloni Elettrodomestici SpA,
and Lucas Aerospace.  Mr. McRoberts holds a M. Eng. from Warwick
University, U.K., as well as a B. Eng. from Strathclyde University,
U.K., and a Masters Certificate in Commercial Project Management
from George Washington University.   

Dan Perez is the current Chief Executive Officer of Clover Wireless
at  Clover Technologies Group, LLC, and will be the CEO of
Reorganized Clover.  Before joining Clover, Mr. Perez advised
private equity firms on, among other things, investments in the
industrial and medical technology space.  Prior to that, Mr. Perez
held numerous positions, including Advisor at Ecopia Farms, an
industrial-scale agriculture startup; CEO and President of OnCore
Manufacturing Services LLC;  Executive Vice President of Worldwide
Account Management & Management at Solectron Corporation; and
multiple management positions at IBM.  Mr. Perez currently serves
on the boards of, among others, 4L Technologies, the Tech Museum of
Innovation, and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation.  Mr. Perez
holds an MBA from the Anderson School of Business at the University
of California, Los Angeles, as well as a bachelor's degree in
Political Science from the University of California, Los Angeles.


A full-text copy of the Second Amended Plan Supplement dated
January 21, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/wcy8c76 from
PacerMonitor at no charge.

                   About Clover Technologies

Clover Technologies Group, LLC, et al. --
http://www.clovertech.com/-- collect and recycle electronic
devices and provide aftermarket management services for mobile
device carriers, manufacturers, retailers, insurance providers and
enterprise businesses.  Formed through organic growth and strategic
acquisitions, the Debtors and their non-debtor affiliates operate
repair centers in North America and abroad and provide services in
over 120 countries.

Clover Technologies Group, LLC and its affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-12680) on Dec. 16,
2019.  Clover Technologies was estimated to have $100 million to
$500 million in assets and liabilities.

The Debtors tapped KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP as counsel; KLEHR HARRISON
HARVEY BRANZBURG LLP as local bankruptcy counsel; ALVAREZ & MARSAL
NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a restructuring advisor; JEFFERIES LLC as
investment banker; and BANKRUPTCY MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, INC., a
claims agent.


DIJA HOLDINGS: Court Confirms Third Amended Plan
------------------------------------------------
Debtor DIJA Holdings, LLC filed its Third Amended Chapter 11 Plan
dated December 17, 2019.  It also filed a Third Amended Disclosure
Statement in support of Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan.

The Court approved the Third Amended Disclosure Statement in its
Order setting deadlines and scheduling a confirmation hearing.
Pursuant to this Order, Debtor properly served its disclosure
statement, its plan of reorganization, the Order and a ballot for
accepting or rejecting the plan on December 19, 2019.

On Jan. 21, 2020, the Debtor filed a Chapter 11 computation of
ballots pertaining to the Third Amended Chapter 11 Plan. Only two
interested parties voted. They both voted to accept the plan.

On Jan. 21, 2020, Judge Shon Hastings ordered that the Debtor's
Third Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization dated Dec. 17,
2019, is confirmed.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter, the Debtor has filed
a plan of reorganization that provides that the Class III claims --
allowed general unsecured claims of DW Excavating Services, Keogh
Law Office, Carquest, Ryerson Concrete LLC, and Norm Friedland --
will be paid 100% of the total amount of the allowed claims.  

The feasibility of the Debtor's Plan of Reorganization is based on
continuing to lease the Real Property to Westex Oilfield Services
or another tenant with a triple net lease with monthly payments
equal to or exceeding $7,250 per month.

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at https://tinyurl.com/qoh4xgv from PacerMonitor.com at
no charge.

A full-text copy of the Order Confirming the Plan dated Jan. 21,
2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/u5dgu97 from PacerMonitor
at no charge.

                       About Dija Holdings

Dija Holdings, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.D. Case No. 19-30408) on July 18, 2019.
In the petition signed by Jason Gillen, managing member, Dija
Holdings was estimated to have assets of less than $500,000 and
liabilities of less than $1 million. The case has been assigned to
Judge Shon Hastings. Dija Holdings is represented by Patten,
Peterman, Bekkedahl & Green PLLC.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.


ELECTRONIC SERVICE: Cash Collateral Use Continued Until March 1
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Ann M. Nevins of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Connecticut authorized Electronic Service Products Corporation
to continue the use of cash collateral through March 1, 2020, or
until otherwise ordered by the Court, whichever shall come sooner.

The Secured Creditor is granted a continuing postpetition lien and
security interest in all prepetition property of the Debtor as it
existed on the Petition Date, of the same type against which
Secured Creditor held validly protected liens and security
interests as of the Petition Date.

The Secured Creditor is also granted a continuing postpetition lien
in all property acquired by the Debtor after the Petition Date.
The replacement liens will maintain the same priority, validity and
enforceability as Secured Creditor's liens on the initial
collateral and will be recognized only to the extent of any
diminution in the value of the collateral resulting from the use of
cash collateral.

To the extent the replacement liens granted to Secured Creditor are
insufficient to compensate Secured Creditor for any diminution in
value of the collateral, Secured Creditor will be entitled to a
super-priority administrative claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section
503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, and Secured Creditor will be
entitled to the protections of and the priority set forth in 11
U.S.C. Section 507(b).

A copy of the Order is available at PacerMonitor.com at
https://is.gd/itsgBO at no charge.

                 About Electronic Service Products

Founded in 1992, Electronic Service Products Corporation is engaged
in the wholesale distribution of electronic parts and electronic
communications equipment.

Electronic Service Products filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Conn. Case No. 17-30704) on May 12, 2017.  In the petition signed
by William Hrubiec, its president, the Debtor was estimated to have
$100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Ann M. Nevins.  The
Debtor tapped William E. Carter, Esq., at the Law Office of William
E. Carter, LLC, as counsel.


ELITE PHARMACEUTICALS: Reports 1.9-Mil. Net Loss for 3rd Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------------
Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
attributable to common shareholders of $1.86 million on $5.05
million of total revenue for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2019,
compared to a net loss attributable to common shareholders of $2.34
million on $2.69 million of total revenue for the three months
ended Dec. 31, 2018.  The increase in revenues was largely
attributed to revenues from the two products launched during the
2020 Fiscal Year, generic immediate release Adderall and Dantrolene
Capsules as well as strong growth in revenues relating to the sales
of Isradipine capsules.

For the nine months ended Dec. 31, 2019, the Company reported a net
loss attributable to common shareholders of $3.18 million on $13.05
million of total revenue compared to a net loss attributable to
common shareholders of $6.61 million on $6.22 million of total
revenue for the same period in 2018.

As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had $24.08 million in total
assets, $15 million in total liabilities, and $9.08 million in
total shareholders' equity.

In connection with the preparation of the financial statements for
the three and nine months ended Dec. 31, 2019, the Company
conducted an evaluation as to whether there were conditions and
events, considered in the aggregate, which raised substantial doubt
as to its ability to continue as a going concern within one year
after the date of the issuance, or the date the financial
statements were available for issuance, noting that there did
appear to be evidence of substantial doubt of its ability to
continue as a going concern.  To continue as a going concern, the
Company will need to do some or all of the following, without
limitation: obtain additional financing, increase sales of existing
products, bring additional products in the pipeline to market
and/or reduce expenses, the successful development of the Company's
contemplated plan of operations, and its transition, ultimately, to
the attainment of profitable operations are necessary for the
Company to continue operations.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at the
SEC's website at:

                      https://is.gd/Z6wj37

                   About Elite Pharmaceuticals

Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. -- http://www.elitepharma.com/-- is a
specialty pharmaceutical company which is developing a pipeline of
niche generic products.  Elite specializes in oral sustained and
controlled release drug products which have high barriers to entry.
Elite owns generic products which have been licensed to TAGI
Pharma, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc., USA., and Lannett Company,
Inc.  Elite currently has eleven approved generic products, three
generic products filed with the FDA, one approved generic products
pending manufacturing site transfer, and an NDA filed for
SequestOx.

Elite reported a net loss attributable to common shareholders of
$9.28 million for the year ended March 31, 2019, compared to a net
loss attributable to common shareholders of $3.67 million for the
year ended March 31, 2018.

Buchbinder Tunick & Company LLP, in Little Falls, New Jersey, the
Company's auditor since 2010, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated June 21, 2019, citing that the
Company has incurred recurring losses from operations, negative
cash flows from operations and has an accumulated deficit that
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.


EMPRESAS CARRION: Says Negotiations With Oriental Still Ongoing
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Empresas Carrion Allende, Inc., submitted a reply to the
objection of Oriental Bank to the Amended Plan of Reorganization
and Disclosure Statement as follows:

All objections presented by the secured creditor Oriental Bank were
taken into consideration, and disclosures include the development
of the alternate plan in which Debtor and the related Debtor Jose
Allende Valverdy have offered to acquire the combined claims of
Oriental Bank in a discounted payoff transaction.  At this point,
the Debtors have presented their offer of $2 million and the bank
has counter-offered with a request of $2.5 million, an achievable
gap that is still under negotiation.

Currently, the Debtors are in the process of requesting additional
funding from Popular Mezzanine Fund, LLC, to reach at least
$2,240,400. The investor has been provided with the documentation
required for the increase and is currently in review. Debtors are
confident that they will be able to reach an agreement with the
secured creditor within the next 30 days.

The Amended Plan does provide a scenario of alternative treatments
to the secured creditor Oriental Bank.  The first contemplates the
payment of the secured portion of the restructured loans over a
period of 30 years, with a monthly payment of $6,044.46 including
principal and interest.  The alternative is the discounted payoff
offer which is currently under negotiations with the bank.

The Debtor notes that Oriental's objection stated that the
development of the properties would result in more expenses by the
Debtor and an investment of at least $400,000.  The $400,000 were
contemplated in the appraisal for the Debtor as an adjustment to
the condition of similar properties, not as a statement of required
repairs.  This estimate also does not consider the fact that the
property is to be leased substantially as is, with the lessor's
repairs limited to the common areas and services.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's reply to objection dated January
21, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/skckmhn from
PacerMonitor at no charge.

Counsel of the Debtor:

      FRANCISCO J. RAMOS & ASOCIADOS, CSP
      Francisco J. Ramos Gonzalez
      SAN JUAN PR 00919-1993
      Tel: (787)764-5134
      E-mail:fjramos@coqui.net

               About Empresas Carrion Allende

Empresas Carrion Allende, Inc., operates a grocery store in
Arecibo, Puerto, Rico.  Empresas Carrion Allende filed its petition
for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.P.R.
Case No. 18-07111) on Dec. 6, 2018.  In the petition was signed by
Sandra I. Carrion Montalvo, president, the Debtor was estimated to
have $1 million to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.  The
case is assigned to the Hon. Mildred Caban Flores.  Francisco J.
Ramos Gonzalez, Esq., at Francisco J. Ramos & Asociados CSP,
represents the Debtor.


ENLINK MIDSTREAM: Moody's Affirms Ba1 Corp. Family Rating
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed EnLink Midstream, LLC's Ba1
Corporate Family Rating, Ba1-PD Probability of Default Rating and
Ba1 senior unsecured notes rating. ENLC's Speculative Grade
Liquidity Rating was upgraded to SGL-2 from SGL-3. ENLC's rating
outlook is stable.

Moody's also affirmed ENLC's subsidiary, EnLink Midstream Partners,
LP's Ba1 senior unsecured notes rating and Ba3 perpetual preferred
units rating. ENLK's rating outlook is stable.

Concurrently, Moody's downgraded GIP III Stetson I, L.P.'s CFR to
B1 from Ba3, PDR to B1-PD from Ba3-PD and the senior secured term
loan rating to B1 from Ba3. The term loan borrowers are GIP III
Stetson I and GIP III Stetson II, L.P. (GIP III Stetson II, and
collectively with GIP III Stetson I, GIP III Stetson). The
borrowers are jointly and severally liable with respect to the term
loan. The rating outlook is stable.

"GIP III Stetson's downgrade reflects its high stand-alone leverage
and reduced cash flow pro forma for EnLink's distribution cut,"
said Amol Joshi, Moody's Vice President and Senior Credit Officer.

Downgrades:

Issuer: GIP III Stetson I, L.P.

Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to B1-PD from Ba3-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to B1 from Ba3

Senior Secured Term Loan, Downgraded to B1 (LGD4) from Ba3 (LGD4)

Affirmations:

Issuer: EnLink Midstream, LLC

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba1-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba1

Senior Unsecured Shelf, Affirmed (P)Ba1

Senior Unsecured Notes, Affirmed Ba1 (LGD4)

Issuer: EnLink Midstream Partners, LP

Perpetual Preferred Units, Affirmed Ba3 (LGD6)

Senior Unsecured Notes, Affirmed Ba1 (LGD4)

Upgrades:

Issuer: EnLink Midstream, LLC

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Upgraded to SGL-2 from SGL-3

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: GIP III Stetson I, L.P.

Outlook, Remains Stable

Issuer: EnLink Midstream, LLC

Outlook, Remains Stable

Issuer: EnLink Midstream Partners, LP

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

ENLC's Ba1 CFR reflects its high proportion of fee-based revenue
with cash flow visibility, but subject to increased volume risk. In
January 2020, ENLC announced a significant unit distribution cut,
boosting its distribution coverage while striving to self-fund its
2020 capital spending needs. Good distribution coverage implies
that EnLink will retain a higher proportion of cash flow,
alleviating the pressure of seeking third party debt and dilutive
equity to finance capital spending. EnLink also has a diversified
asset base, but growing cash flow in 2020-21 will be challenging.
The company has a large exposure to the STACK, where it faces
volume risk due to a substantial reduction in 2020 drilling
activity by Devon Energy Corporation (Devon, Ba1 positive), its
largest counterparty. EnLink also has significant exposure to the
mature Barnett Shale, where volumes have been declining. EnLink
will need to offset this volume and cash flow decline through
capital intensive growth in other regions such as the Permian,
which entails execution risk. EnLink's 2020 capital spending will
largely be focused in the Permian Basin, followed by spending to
enhance its Louisiana assets. EnLink receives significant revenue
from Devon, and EnLink's rating reflects the company's sizable
customer concentration risk with Devon.

ENLC's SGL-2 rating reflects good liquidity, and EnLink should
generate modest positive free cash flow in 2020 supported by its
significant distribution cut and reduced capital spending. The
company is striving to self-fund its capital expenditures and
reduce reliance on the capital markets. ENLC has a $1.75 billion
revolving credit facility, which is guaranteed by ENLK and matures
in January 2024. At September 30, the company had about $102
million of cash and $275 million outstanding under its credit
facility. The revolver has two material financial covenants, a
maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 5x (relaxed to 5.5x for the
quarter of an acquisition and the following three quarters) and a
minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of 2.5x. Moody's
expects the company to remain in covenant compliance into 2021.
EnLink's nearest significant maturity is its $850 million unsecured
term loan maturing in December 2021. The term loan contains
substantially the same covenants as the revolving credit facility.

While the distribution cut was supportive to ENLC's rating, this
has meaningfully reduced the cash flow received by GIP III Stetson
I, resulting in the downgrade of its CFR to B1 from Ba3. GIP III
Stetson I's B1 CFR reflects its structural subordination to the
debt at EnLink, the company's standing as a pure-play entity
without any hard assets, and its high stand-alone financial
leverage. GIP III Stetson acquired Devon's controlling interests in
the EnLink companies in July 2018. GIP III Stetson owns 100%
interest in EnLink Midstream Manager (EMM, unrated) and about 40%
equity interest in ENLC pro forma for ENLK's Series B preferred
dilution. GIP III Stetson's ability to service its debt is solely
reliant on distributions from EnLink, a distribution stream which
is junior to EnLink's substantial financing and operating
requirements. GIP III Stetson's leverage on a stand-alone basis pro
forma for its reduced cash flow due to EnLink's distribution cut is
high, around 5x Debt/EBITDA. However, leverage should gradually
improve, driven by mandatory payments from the term loan's excess
cash flow sweep feature. GIP III Stetson could also sell ENLC units
but could be required to use part of the disposition proceeds to
prepay a portion of the term loan subject to certain leverage ratio
thresholds.

The B1 rating on the senior secured term loan is in line with GIP
III Stetson I's CFR, reflecting the term loan's first priority
claim on the ownership interests in EMM and ENLC and it being the
only debt outstanding at the company.

GIP III Stetson should have adequate liquidity, however, GIP III
Stetson's cash flows will weaken following EnLink's distribution
cut. With limited administrative overhead, GIP III Stetson does not
have significant liquidity needs and it should receive sufficient
distributions from EnLink to still comfortably cover interest
expense. The financial maintenance covenant is a minimum debt
service coverage ratio of 1.1x. There is a 1% mandatory
amortization of the term loan per annum and 75% excess cash flow
recapture when stand-alone leverage is above 5x, but stepping down
to 50% when standalone leverage is equal to or less than 5x and 0%
when standalone leverage is equal to or less than 2.5x. The
alternate sources of liquidity are limited given that its ownership
interests secure the term loan. However, GIP III Stetson has the
ability to sell ENLC units subject to certain restrictions.

ENLC's and ENLK's outlooks are stable reflecting good liquidity and
distribution coverage. EnLink's rating could be upgraded if the
company achieves debt/EBITDA below 4x and consolidated leverage
(inclusive of GIP III Stetson debt) below 4.5x, while maintaining
strong distribution coverage. For an upgrade, EnLink should also
successfully grow cash flow to more than offset expected decline
within its mature assets. Ratings would likely be downgraded if
debt/EBITDA increases to exceed 5x, or consolidated leverage
(inclusive of GIP III Stetson debt) exceeds 5.5x, or distribution
coverage significantly deteriorates. Additional debt at GIP III
Stetson would pressure EnLink's rating.

GIP III Stetson I's rating outlook is stable, reflecting Moody's
expectation for financial leverage to gradually improve from high
levels. An upgrade could be considered if EnLink's rating is
upgraded or stand-alone GIP III Stetson leverage falls below 4x. A
downgrade would occur if EnLink is downgraded, if distributions
received from EnLink decline further, or stand-alone EBITDA to
interest expense falls below 2.5x.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Midstream
Energy published in December 2018.

EnLink Midstream, LLC is a publicly traded company engaged in
midstream energy services through its subsidiary EnLink Midstream
Partners, LP, including the gathering, processing, fractionation,
transportation and marketing of natural gas, natural gas liquids
and crude oil in several US regions, including in the STACK, Cana
and Arkoma Woodford Shales, Barnett Shale, Permian Basin and
Louisiana.

GIP III Stetson owns controlling interests in the EnLink companies.


FF FUND I: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to May 21
-------------------------------------------------------
FF Fund I L.P. asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida to extend the periods during which the company
has the exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan and to solicit
acceptances for the plan to May 21 and July 20, respectively.

FF Fund is seeking joint administration of its Chapter 11 case and
the bankruptcy case filed by F5 Business Investment Partners, LLC.
The company expects that any plan it would file would be a joint
plan with its subsidiary.

                        About FF Fund I L.P.

FF Fund I L.P., an investment company based in Miami, filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-22744) on Sept. 24, 2019.  In the
petition signed by Soneet R. Kapila, chief restructuring officer,
the Debtor was estimated to have $50 million to $100 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  Paul J.
Battista, Esq., at Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A., is the
Debtor's legal counsel.

The U.S. Trustee, until further notice, will not appoint an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Debtor's case,
according to court dockets.



FIRST FLORIDA: Exclusivity Period Extended to March 2
-----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida
extended the exclusivity period for First Florida Living Options,
LLC to file its Chapter 11 plan to March 2 and the period to
solicit acceptances for the plan to May 4.

The extension will provide the company with more time to complete
negotiations and obtain sales information from its broker so that
it can provide creditors with sufficient information about the
plan.

First Florida has recently received a letter of intent for the
purchase of its assets and leasehold interest, and needs time to
negotiate and finalize a counteroffer or consider other possible
purchases.

                 About First Florida Living Options

First Florida Living Options LLC, formerly known as Surrey Place of
Ocala, conducts its business under the names Hawthorne Health and
Rehab of Ocala, Hawthorne Village of Ocala and Hawthorne Inn of
Ocala. The company is based in Ocala, Fla.

First Florida Living Options filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-02764) on July 22, 2019.  The petition was
signed by John M. Crock, vice president of Florida Living Options.
The Debtor was estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.  

Judge Jerry A. Funk oversees the case.  Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel &
Burns, LLP is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


FIZZ & BUBBLE: Gets Final Nod to Use Cash Collateral Until March 27
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Trish M. Brown of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Oregon entered a final order authorizing Fizz & Bubble, LLC to
use cash collateral not to exceed $1,767,912 for the period through
March 27, 2020, for the purposes specified in the Budget.

Judge Brown ordered that the Lien Creditors are each granted the
following adequate protection:

     (a) A perfected lien and security interest on all property,
whether now owned or hereafter acquired by Debtor of the same
nature and kind as secured by the claim of each of the Lien
Creditors on the Petition Date. Such Replacement Lien will not
attach to avoidance or recovery actions of Debtor's estate under
Chapter 5 of the Code. The Replacement Lien will be subject to all
valid, properly perfected and enforceable liens and interests that
existed as of the Petition Date.

     (b) The interests of the Lien Creditors in the Replacement
Collateral will have the same relative priorities as the liens held
by them as of the Petition Date.

     (c) The Debtor will timely perform and complete all actions
necessary and appropriate to protect the Cash Collateral against
diminution in value.

     (d) The Replacement Lien on the Replacement Collateral will be
perfected and enforceable upon entry of this Order without regard
to whether such Replacement Lien is perfected under applicable
non-bankruptcy law.

     (e) The Replacement Lien will be in addition to all other
liens and security interests securing the secured claims of the
Lien Creditors in existence on the Petition Date.

     (f) The Debtor will keep Lien Creditors' collateral and
Replacement Collateral free and clear of all other liens,
encumbrances and security interests, other than those in existence
on the Petition Date, and will pay when due all taxes, levies and
charges arising or accruing from and after the Petition Date.

     (g) Upon reasonable prior notice, the Debtor will allow Lien
Creditors access during normal business hours to Debtor's premises
to inspect or appraise their collateral.

     (h) If, notwithstanding the adequate protection provided by
the terms of the Interim Order, any of the Lien Creditors has a
claim allowable under 11 U.S.C. section 507(a)(2) arising from the
stay of action against property of Debtor under 11 U.S.C. section
362, from the use, sale or lease of such property, or from the
granting of the replacement lien, then such Lien Creditor's claim
under 11 U.S.C. section 507(a)(2) will have priority over every
other claim under such subsection as provided by 11 U.S.C. section
507(b).

     (i) The Debtor will maintain a minimum Asset Base of
$1,250,000 throughout the Budget Period.

A copy of the Final Order is available for free at
https://is.gd/KtoxqP from Pacermonitor.com

                        About Fizz & Bubble

Fizz & Bubble, LLC -- https://fizzandbubble.com/ -- is a toiletries
wholesaler based in Wilsonville, Oregon offering an array of
luxurious bath and shower treats.  The company's products include
bath fizzies, bubble bath cupcakes, bubble bath elixirs, bath
truffles, bath melts, shower steamers, body scrubs, whipped soaps,
body frosting lotions, face mask frostings, and lip scrubs.

Fizz & Bubble filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Ore. Case No. 19-34092) on Nov. 4, 2019.  In the petition signed by
Kimberly Ann Mitchell, sole member and chief creative officer, the
Debtor was estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.  The Hon. Trish M. Brown oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by Douglas R. Ricks, Esq., at Vanden Bos
& Chapman, LLP.



FOREVER 21: Exclusivity Period Extended to April 27
---------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware extended the
exclusivity period for Forever 21, Inc., and its affiliates to file
a Chapter 11 plan to April 27 and the period to solicit votes on
the plan to June 25.

The companies are working to develop a sale of substantially all of
their assets in a going-concern transaction and are working
closely, and collaboratively, with all of their stakeholders in
this pursuit. The proposed extension of the exclusivity periods
will allow the companies to maintain focus on completing their
restructuring initiatives and will allow the restructuring process
to continue unhindered by competing plans.

                         About Forever 21

Founded in 1984, and headquartered in Los Angeles, Calif., Forever
21, Inc. -- http://www.forever21.com/-- is a fast fashion retailer
of women's, men's and kids clothing and accessories and is known
for offering the hottest, most current fashion trends at a great
value to consumers.  Forever 21 delivers a curated assortment of
new merchandise brought in daily.

Forever 21, Inc. and seven of its U.S. subsidiaries each filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-12122) on Sept.
29, 2019.  According to the petition, Forever 21 has estimated
liabilities on a consolidated basis of between $1 billion and $10
billion against assets of the same range.  

As of the bankruptcy filing, the Debtors operated 534 stores under
the Forever 21 brand in the U.S. and 15 stores under beauty and
wellness brand, Riley Rose.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as legal advisor; Alvarez &
Marsal as restructuring advisor; and Lazard as investment banker;
and Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as local bankruptcy counsel.
Prime Clerk is the claims agent.

Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, appointed a
committee of unsecured creditors on Oct. 11, 2019.  The committee
is represented by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP and Saul
Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP.

Counsel to the administrative agent under the Debtors' prepetition
revolving credit facility and the Debtors' DIP ABL financing
facility are Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP and Richards, Layton &
Finger, PA.

Counsel to the administrative agent under the Debtors' DIP term
loan facility is Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP.


FUSE GROUP: Reports $29K Net Loss for First Quarter Ended Dec. 31
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fuse Group Holding Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $29,411 on $250,000 of revenue for the three months ended Dec.
31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $62,330 on $516,000 of revenue
for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2018.

As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had $1.13 million in total assets,
$56,821 in total liabilities, and $1.07 million in total
stockholders' equity.

Fuse Group stated, "If we are not successful in transitioning into
the mining business and establishing profitability and positive
cash flow, additional capital may be required to maintain ongoing
operations.  We have explored and continue to explore options to
provide additional financing to fund future operations as well as
other possible courses of action.  Such actions may include, but
are not limited to, securing lines of credit, sales of debt or
equity securities (which may result in dilution to existing
shareholders), loans and cash advances from other third parties or
banks, and other similar actions.  There can be no assurance we
will be able to obtain additional funding (if needed), on
acceptable terms or at all, through a sale of our common stock,
loans from financial institutions, or other third parties, or any
of the actions discussed above.  If we cannot sustain profitable
operations, and additional capital is unavailable, lack of
liquidity could have a material adverse effect on our business
viability, financial position, results of operations and cash
flows."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at the
SEC's website at:

                        https://is.gd/JmHFMD

                         About Fuse Group

Headquartered in Arcadia, CA, Fuse Group provides consulting
services to mining industry clients to find acquisition targets
within the parameters set by the clients, when the mine owner is
considering selling its mining rights.  The services of Fuse Group
and Fuse Processing, Inc. include due diligence on the potential
mine seller and the mine, such as ownership of the mine and whether
the mine meets all operation requirements and/or is currently in
operation.

Fuse Group reported a net loss of $79,656 for the year ended Sept.
30, 2019, compared to a net loss of $4.22 million for the year
ended Sept. 30, 2018.

Prager Metis, CPA's LLP, in El Segundo, California, the Company's
auditor since 2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated Jan. 13, 2020 citing that the Company had recurring
losses from operations and accumulated deficit.  These conditions,
among others, raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern.


GABRIEL INVESTMENT: Exclusivity Period Extended to March 24
-----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas
extended the exclusivity period for Gabriel Investment Group, Inc.
and its affiliates to file a Chapter 11 plan to March 24 and the
period to confirm the plan to May 22.

The companies have been exploring various investment opportunities
to bring in additional cash flow, which will allow them to propose
a plan supported by at least one creditor class. The companies are
currently in the process of retaining an investor to ensure a
feasible plan can be proposed.  They have spoken with many
potential investors, however, negotiations are still ongoing.

While the companies hoped that the new financing would have been in
place by now, the delay will not prejudice any party as they
continue to satisfy their post-petition obligations and are
generating positive cash flow, according to court filings.

                  About Gabriel Investment Group

Gabriel Investment Group, Inc., founded in 1948, operates a chain
of package stores that sell wines, liquors, and beers. As of the
petition date, Gabriel operates 15 package store locations as
Gabriel's Liquor and 30 package store locations as Don's & Ben's
Liquor.

Gabriel Investment Group sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bank. W.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 19-52298) on Sept.
27, 2019 in San Antonio Texas. The other debtor affiliates are:
Don's & Ben's Inc. (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 19-52299); Gabriel Holdings,
LLC (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 19-52300); SA Discount Liquors, Inc. (Bankr.
W.D. Tex. 19-52301); and Gabriel GP, Inc. (Bankr. W.D. Tex.
19-52302).  In the petitions signed by Inez Cindy Gabriel,
president, the Debtors were estimated to have assets at $1 million
to $10 million and liabilities within the same range.  

Judge Ronald B. King oversees the cases.  

The Debtors tapped Pulman Cappuccio & Pullen, LLP as legal
counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed creditors to serve on the
official committee of unsecured creditors on Nov. 21, 2019.  The
committee is represented by Muller Smeberg, PLLC.


GALVESTON BAY PROPERTIES: March 9 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Eduardo V. Rodriguez has ordered that the hearing to consider
the approval of the disclosure statement filed by GALVESTON BAY
PROPERTIES, LLC, et al, GALVESTON BAY OPERATING COMPANY, LLC will
be held at the United States Courthouse, Bob Casey Federal
Building, Courtroom #402, 515 Rusk, Houston, Texas, 77002 on March
9, 2020, at 4:00 o’clock p.m..

March 2, 2020 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the disclosure statement.

                About Galveston Bay Properties
     
Galveston Bay Properties is a privately held company that operates
in the oil and gas extraction business.  Its principal assets
include oil and gas leases in Chambers and Galveston Counties,
Texas.  

Galveston Bay Properties, LLC, and affiliate Galveston Bay
Operating Company LLC sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.
Tex. Lead Case No. 19-36075) on Nov. 1, 2019 in Houston, Texas.  As
of the Petition Date, each of the Debtors was estimated to have $1
million to $10 million in assets and liabilities.  Judge Eduardo V.
Rodriguez is the presiding judge.  KELL C. MERCER, P.C., and OKIN
ADAMS, LLC serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.


GATEWAY WIRELESS: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------
Judge Laura K. Grandy has ordered that the Amended Disclosure
Statement filed by Gateway Wireless LLC is APPROVED.

A hearing for the consideration of confirmation of the Amended Plan
of Reorganization will be held on March 12, 2020, at 9:00 a.m., in
U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Melvin Price US Courthouse, 750 Missouri
Ave, East St Louis, IL 62201.  

Acceptances or rejections of their Plan shall be submitted on or
before seven days prior to the date of hearing on confirmation of
said Plan.

Any objection to confirmation of the Plan shall be filed on or
before seven days prior to the date of the hearing on confirmation
of the Plan.

                     About Gateway Wireless

Gateway Wireless LLC is a privately-held company in Glen Carbon,
Illinois, which operates in the telecommunications industry.   

Gateway Wireless sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ill. Case No. 18-31491) on Oct. 12,
2018. In the petition signed by Ryan F. Walker, president, the
Debtor estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and
liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.  Judge Laura K. Grandy
is the presiding judge.  The Debtor tapped Carmody MacDonald P.C.
as its legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed.


GOLDEN JUBILEE: Unsec. Creditors to Get Payment for 20 Quarters
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Golden Jubilee, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, a Combined
Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization.

The Debtor scheduled secured liabilities as follows: Cedartree
Holdings, LLC - Series II ($196,000 secured by Debtor's real
property); Commercial Bank ($4000 secured by Debtor's 2010 Lexus SH
250); Hood County ($9,800 for ad valorem taxes) and Ovation
Services ($35,000 for tax loans).  The Debtor also scheduled
approximately $3,000 owed to the Texas Comptroller. Debtor does not
owe any unsecured debts.

Class 4 Unsecured Claims consists of all other Allowed Unsecured
Claims against the Debtor not placed in any other Class. Allowed
Class 4 Claims will be paid quarterly and will share pro rata in
the funds available and remaining after payment of Reorganized
Debtor's normal operating expenses and the Priority and Secured
Claims. The amount to be distributed to Class 4 Unsecured Creditors
will be paid for 20 quarters after the Effective Date.

The Equity Interest Holder will receive nothing under the Plan
until all other classes of creditors have been paid pursuant to the
Plan.  However, due to the substantial amount of money, expertise,
labor and management which the Equity Interest Holder has provided
and will provide to the Plan, the Equity Interest Holder will
retain its ownership interest in the Debtor.

The Debtor has maintained its operations since the filing of this
case. The closing on the sale of the note held by the Class 1
Creditor will be held as soon as practicable after entry of the
order confirming this plan, but not later than 60 days thereafter.
All other payments required under the Plan after the Effective Date
shall be made by Debtor from revenues generated by the continued
operation of its business and/or modification of the terms of its
loans with secured creditors as provided for herein.

From and after the Confirmation Date, the Reorganized Debtor will
perform the remaining obligations of the Debtor under the Plan and
will make all payments required to be made under the Plan.
Existing management will continue to manage the date-to-day
operations of Debtor's business following confirmation of the Plan.
Consummation of the Plan shall occur upon the Effective Date.  The
Debtor projects its monthly income to be approximately $60,000 per
month during the term of the Plan.  The Debtor also projects its
operating expenses and payment of its secured debt pursuant to the
plan can be satisfied at this income level.

A full-text copy of the Combined Disclosure Statement and Plan of
Reorganization dated Jan. 23, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/s3mp5tu from PacerMonitor at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

       Marilyn D. Garner
       2001 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 200
       Arlington, Texas 76006
       Tel: (817) 505-1499
       Fax: (817) 549-7200

                     About Golden Jubilee

Golden Jubilee, Inc., has been engaged in ownership and management
of a gas station and convenience store commonly known as Cresson
Food Store,  located at 9411 E. Hwy 377, Cresson, Denton County,
Texas.  Shares of ownership in Debtor are held by its President,
Nurudin Ismail.   

Golden Jubilee, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection under the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Case No. 19-42712) on July 1, 2019.  The Honorable Mark X.
Mullin oversees the Debtor's case.  Marilyn D. Garner, Esq., at the
LAW OFFICES OF MARILYN D. GARNER, represents the Debtor.


GRACE PARK TOWNHOME: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Grace Park Townhome Apartments, LLC
        7708 Crowder Blvd.
        New Orleans, LA 70127

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 13, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Louisiana

Case No.: 20-10329

Debtor's Counsel: Benny Council, Esq.
                  THE COUNCIL LAW FIRM, LLC
                  419 S. Salcedo St.
                  New Orleans, LA 70119
                  Tel: 504-822-8350
                  E-mail: Ben@TheCouncilLawFirm.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $100,000 to $500,000

The petition was signed by Artie T. Fletcher, member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's four unsecured creditors is available for free
at PacerMonitor.com at:

                     https://is.gd/fJvHc0


GREEN GLOBAL: PA Dept. of Revenue Objects to Disclosures & Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of Attorney General, on behalf
of the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, objects to the approval
of the Amended Disclosure Statement and to confirmation of the
Second Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization dated Dec. 5,
2019, of debtor Green Global, LLC.

The Pennsylvania Department of Revenue (PA DOR) is a party in
interest having asserted a claim for prepetition unpaid taxes in
the amount of $6,172.  Of this sum, $2,392 is asserted as a secured
claim and $2,530 as an unsecured claim.

The PA DOR complains that:

  * The Second Amended Plan does not comply with 11 U.S.C Sec.
1129(a)(9)(C)(ii), as it provides for regular installment payments
of the trust-fund debt claimed by the PA DOR beyond 60 months after
the order for relief.

  * The failure of the Debtor to file the required outstanding tax
returns may result in an additional tax liability which is neither
disclosed nor provided for in the Plan.

  * The Debtors have not provided sufficient information regarding
their state tax obligations and filing requirements to provide the
required disclosure of "adequate information" pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
Sec. 1125.

  * PA DOR has not received any payments from the Debtor since
before the commencement of the case.  None of the payments provided
for under the previously confirmed Chapter 11 Plan have been
received by the Debtor.

  * The Debtor's failure to remit tax payments required by the
previously confirmed Chapter 11 Plan demonstrates a lack of good
faith and an inability to consistently fund a Plan. The Second
Amended Plan is not feasible as required by 11 U.S.C. Sec.
1129(a)(11).

A full-text copy of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's objection
dated Jan. 23, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/twdlraa
from PacerMonitor at no charge.

                      About Green Global

Based in Southwest, Pennsylvania, Green Global, LLC, filed a
voluntary Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr. W.D. Penn. Case No. 14-20131)
on Jan. 10, 2014.  At the time of filing, the Debtor was estimated
to have assets are $100,000 to $500,000, and the estimated
liabilities are $1 million to $10 million.  The case is assigned to
Hon. Thomas P. Agresti.  Steidl and Steinberg, P.C., led by
Christopher M. Frye, is the Debtor's counsel.


GULF COAST: Loroh's Objection to $7.8M Sale of All Assets Overruled
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Caryl E. Delano of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida overruled Creditor Loroh, LP's limited
objection to Gulf Coast Medical Park, LLC's sale of substantially
all assets to AW Real Estate Management, LLC for $7.8 million.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Jan. 22, 2020 at 11:30 a.m.

Unless otherwise defined, all capitalized terms in the Order will
have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Response.  

Loroh's Allowed Secured Claim has been satisfied in full by way of
its receipt of the initial payment of $100,000 in accordance with
the Settlement Agreement, and its receipt of $2.9 million at the
closing of the Sale, for a total payment of $3 million.

The Court will retain jurisdiction to award the Debtor reasonable
attorneys' fees upon motion therefor.

                 About Gulf Coast Medical Park

Gulf Coast Medical Park LLC, based in Punta Gorda, Fla., filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 18-02446) on March
28, 2018.  In the petition signed by Magnus Karlstedt, managing
member, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets
and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities.  The Hon. Caryl E.
Delano is the case judge.  Michael R. Dal Lago, Esq., at Dal Lago
Law, serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.  Holmes Fraser,
P.A., is the special litigation counsel; and Webb, Lorah &
McMillan, PLLC, CPAs, is the accountant.  No official committee of
unsecured creditors has been appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


HARDEN FARMS: March 17 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
----------------------------------------------------
On Jan. 20, 2020, debtor Harden Farms, Inc., filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina,
Greenville Division, a Disclosure Statement and a Plan.

On Jan. 21, 2020, Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse conditionally
approved the Disclosure Statement and established the following
dates and deadlines:

  * March 11, 2020 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
in accordance with Rule 3017(a), Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure, written objections to the disclosure statement.

  * March 11, 2020 is fixed as the last day for filing written
acceptances or rejections of the Plan. The enclosed ballot should
be completed and filed with the plan proponent on or before that
date.

  * March 11, 2020 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to confirmation of the Plan.

  * March 17, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. in Room 208, 300 Fayetteville
Street, Raleigh, NC 27602 is the hearing to consider final approval
of the Disclosure Statement and confirmation of the Plan.

A copy of the Conditional Order dated Jan. 21, 2020, is available
at https://tinyurl.com/wm7to4o from PacerMonitor at no charge.

                       About Harden Farms

Harden Farms, Inc., is a privately held company in the crop farming
industry.

Harden Farms sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No.
19-02379) on May 24, 2019. In the petition signed by Charles M.
Harden, president, the Debtor disclosed $1,333,936 in assets and
$1,720,421 in liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.  The Hon.
Stephani W. Humrickhouse is the case judge.  STUBBS & PERDUE, P.A.,
led by Trawick H. Stubbs, Jr., Esq., is serving as the Debtor's
counsel.


HARVEY OST OILFIELD: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Harvey Ost Oilfield Services, LLC
        PO Box 1509
        Malta, MT 59538-1509

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 13, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Montana

Case No.: 20-40017

Judge: Hon. Benjamin P. Hursh

Debtor's Counsel: Steven M. Johnson, Esq.
                  CHURCH HARRIS JOHNSON & WILLIAMS PC
                  PO Box 1645
                  Great Falls, MT 59403-1645
                  Tel: 406-761-3000

Total Assets: $2,237,856

Total Liabilities: $3,453,529

The petition was signed by Dennis Ost, managing member.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                     https://is.gd/RJMbSK


HEATING & PLUMBING: Unsecureds to Get Share of  Revenue for 5 Years
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Heating and Plumbing Engineers, Inc., by and through its
attorneys, Kutner Brinen, P.C., files its Redlined Amended
Disclosure Statement to accompany Amended Plan of Reorganization
Dated October 31, 2019.

Unless otherwise provided in the Plan, the Debtor shall, as
Reorganized Debtor, continue to exist after the Effective Date of
the Plan with the same corporate powers as existed prior to Plan
confirmation pursuant to the laws of the jurisdiction of
organization of the Debtor entity.

The Plan proposes to treat secured claims as follows:

  * Class 2 - Allowed Secured Claim held by the El Paso County
Treasurer. Amortized repayment of claim over twelve months with
statutory interest at 12% per annum; monthly payment will be
approximately $8,709.81.

  * Class 3 - Allowed Secured Claim held by the State of Colorado.
Amortized repayment of claim over no more than five-year period
following the Petition Date with statutory interest at a rate of 8%
per annum; monthly payment will be $6,342.

  * Class 4(a and b) - Allowed Secured Claim held by Vectra Bank
Colorado and Vectra Equipment Finance. Class 4(b) amortized and
repaid over 60-month period at 6% per annum.

  * Class 5 - Allowed Secured Claim held by the Funds.  Amortized
with interest at a rate of 4% per annum and repaid over ten year
period with five-year balloon with negotiated reductions in payment
due to interim paydowns; monthly payment prior to balloon payment
will be $8,443.21.

The Debtor has a number of unsecured prepetition date creditors.
Based upon the scheduled claims and the Proofs of Claim filed in
this case, the total amount of allowed unsecured claims is
approximately $21,760,796.  The Debtor has paid approximately $2.5
million to prepetition claimants under the Colorado Mechanics Lien
Trust Fund Statute.  The estimated unsecured claim balance
comprising Class 8 is anticipated to be approximately $4,395,035
excluding the claims of general contractors and Western Surety
Company and the disputed claim of Paul Higgins.  If the disputed
claims are allowed in full, the total amount of unsecured claims
could increase up to the full amount of $21,760,796.

Class 8 will receive a pro rata distribution equal to a variable
percentage of the Debtor's Gross Revenue generated over a 5-year
period commencing on the later of: a) the Effective Date of the
Plan; or b) the  date following the date on which all Unclassified
Priority Claims, are  paid in full ("Repayment Term").  The Debtor
may use the variable  percentage of Gross Revenue payment to the
extent necessary to pay any  Unclassified Priority Claimant who
agrees to accept deferred payment of its claim, however the five
year repayment for Class 8 will not start   until after the
Professional Fee Claims are paid in full ("Class 8 Distribution").
The variable percentage of Gross Revenue paid to Class 8 creditors
will be equal to:

   * 1% of the Gross Revenue during the first and second year of
the Repayment Term;
   * 1.5% of the Gross Revenue during the third year of the
Repayment Term;  
   * 2.5% of the Gross Revenue generated during the fourth year of
the Repayment Term, and
   * 3% of the Gross Revenue generated during the fifth year of the
Repayment Term.

Commencing on the first full month following the Confirmation Date,
the Debtor will at the conclusion of each month, set aside in a
segregated account, an amount equal to the requisite percentage of
the preceding  month's Gross Revenue ("Monthly Distribution
Amount").

A full-text copy of the Redlined Amended Disclosure dated January
23, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yx4roxk2 from
PacerMonitor at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

       Lee M. Kutner
       Keri L. Riley
       KUTNER BRINEN, P.C.
       1660 Lincoln St., Suite 1850
       Denver, CO 80264
       Telephone: (303) 832-2400
       Telecopy: (303) 832-1510
       E-mail: klr@kutnerlaw.com

             About Heating & Plumbing Engineers

Founded in 1947, Heating & Plumbing Engineers, Inc., a mechanical
contractor, provides HVAC sheet metal, plumbing, and piping systems
services in Colorado.

Heating & Plumbing Engineers filed a voluntary petition pursuant to
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case
No.19-16183) on July 19, 2019.  In the petition signed by CEO
William T. Eustace, the Debtor disclosed $13,845,361 in assets and
$14,934,602 in liabilities.  Lee M. Kutner, Esq., at Kutner Brinen,
P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.


IMMACULATA UNIVERSITY: Fitch Cuts $38.4MM 2017 Bonds to BB-
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded the rating on the following Chester
County Health and Educational Facilities Authority revenue bonds,
issued on behalf of Immaculata University to 'BB-' from 'BB':

  -- $38.4 million series 2017.

In addition, Fitch has assigned an Issuer Default Rating of 'BB-'
to Immaculata.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The series 2017 bonds are secured by a lien and security interest
in the pledged revenues of Immaculata.

ANALYTICAL CONCLUSION

Immaculata's 'BB-' ratings reflect weakened leverage metrics, due
in part to enrollment declines in conjunction with less than
anticipated expense reductions. There is the potential for
improvement in the next few years, should cash flow and associated
enrollment growth occur. Fiscal 2019 balance sheet metrics remain
thin, though adequate, for the current rating relative to weaker
demand and midrange assessments of operating risk.

The Downgrade reflects continued deterioration in Immaculata's cash
flow and AF to debt ratios through fiscal 2019, contributing to an
already weak balance sheet.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Revenue Defensibility: 'bb'

Stabilizing Demand; Limited Other Revenues

Immaculata's revenue defensibility assessment is characteristic of
the university's moderate to weak demand indicators, declines in
admissions and enrollment, and limited market position. This
weakness is partially mitigated by improved demand in fall 2019,
suggesting potential for improvement in future years, and a history
of moderate and sustainable endowment spending.

Operating Risk: 'bbb'

Thin Cash Flow; Manageable Capital Needs

The operating risk assessment reflects Fitch's expectations for
limited cash flow margins as the university works to stabilize
demand and scale expenses in the near to intermediate term. Fitch
assumes lifecycle investment needs may be very high, given thin
capex to depreciation and the high average age of plant. There is
flexibility in the timing of capital projects and management has
demonstrated success garnering targeted donor support for strategic
projects.

Financial Profile: 'bb'

Thin Balance Sheet Cushion

The financial profile assessment of 'bb' reflects relatively high
leverage through a moderate investment stress relative to the
university's limited business profile strength. Balance sheet
metrics have declined in recent years due in part to the investment
in facilities; however, management anticipates stabilization in
fiscal 2020. Maintenance of this assessment requires careful
management of spending relative to enrollment trends to enable the
university to sustain its balance sheet over the intermediate
term.

Asymmetric Additional Risk Considerations

No asymmetric additional risk considerations were applied to the
rating.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to a
Negative Rating Action:

  -- Further declines in net tuition and fee revenues;

  -- Failure to improve cash flow margins at levels consistently
above 5%;

  -- Deterioration of AF to debt below 20%.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to a
Positive Rating Action:

  -- Consistent trend of positive enrollment growth and a buildup
in unrestricted cash and investment levels over time resulting in
sustained AF to debt at or above 30%.

CREDIT PROFILE

Located in Chester County, 20 miles west of Philadelphia,
Immaculata University is a Catholic comprehensive, coeducational
institution of higher learning. The school was founded in 1920 in
Malvern by the Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in
1920. It was the first Catholic women's college established in the
Philadelphia area and has since expanded coeducational programs at
all levels. Currently FTE enrollment is approximately 1,700
students in 53 undergraduate majors, seven master's degree
programs, three doctoral degree programs, and over 40 additional
professional endorsement, certificate and certification programs.

REVENUE DEFENSIBILITY

Immaculata's revenue defensibility assessment is characterized by a
historical trend of weakening demand. Full time equivalent
enrollment declined by about 18% between fiscal years 2016 and 2019
before improving by about 3% in fall 2019, indicating potential
stabilization in fiscal 2020 and potential for improvement in
future years. Other revenue sources are limited and endowment
spending is manageable.

Demand indicators have historically been mixed, with acceptance
rates over 80% and matriculation below 20%. More favorably, SAT
scores approximate state and national averages and efforts to
improve retention have borne fruit, with freshman to sophomore year
retention jumping over 85% in fiscal 2019 from 75% the prior year.
Management indicates that retention remains a strength to date in
fiscal 2020, and has implemented strategies to maintain this
improvement in future years.

Immaculata's underlying market remains fairly weak, driven by a
trend of flat to declining high school graduates within the state
and significant competition for students from neighboring New
Jersey. That said, the university's efforts to expand
non-traditional programs and focus on certification for high-demand
health science and nursing professions, which management believes
provides Immaculata with a niche in the competitive market that may
support future growth efforts.

Other revenue sources are limited, as student-generated revenues
constitute approximately 90% of university operations. Immaculata's
endowment spending practices remain sustainable, but provide
limited support for operations.

Immaculata's student base exhibits an elevated level of price
sensitivity, as even modest increases in net tuition and fee
revenues are likely to result in further demand pressure. Relative
stability in net tuition and fees per FTE is expected going forward
and growing enrollment may improve this metric going forward.

Immaculata has demonstrated some capacity to scale expenses with
historical revenue declines, but these efforts have resulted in a
thin cash flow and generally limited capacity for operating cost
flexibility in future years. These margins have been generally at
or above 5% in recent years. Fiscal 2019 was a notable outlier,
with a cash flow margin of just 4% as management struggled to
reduce spending with yet another year of enrollment decline.
Revenue growth in fiscal 2020 year to date, and expectations for
more stable revenue performance in future years underpin Fitch's
expectation that margins will stabilize around 5% in the near
term.

Capital investment in recent years has largely improved facilities
to address the university's strategic needs. Fundraising efforts,
commencing in fiscal 2020, are earmarked to provide Immaculata with
the final elements of its capital plan management considers
necessary to sustain enrollment growth in key program areas.
Despite this funding, Fitch evaluates the university's capital
spending requirements as very high.

Capital spending as a percentage of depreciation has fluctuated,
but management reports it has maintained facilities at adequate
levels relative to strategic needs. Key investments have included
the construction of a $2.7 million student activities center
completed in fiscal 2019 to help improve retention. Near-term needs
include the replacement of a turf field and a new science
laboratory facility. The lab is expected to cost around $6.5
million and management reports that the fundraising for this
project is currently underway, with total pledges equaling nearly
half of the expected construction cost. Construction is not
expected to commence until fiscal 2021. Further, Fitch assumes that
given the limited excess cash flow, there may be increased deferred
maintenance needs.

FINANCIAL PROFILE

Fitch's base case analysis reflects consistent to improving cash
flow and a modestly declining trend of AF to adjusted debt over the
forward look, somewhat below historical levels and appropriate for
the rating category. The scenario's near-term leverage is
consistent with fiscal 2019 results and mid-year fiscal 2020
expectations. The base case assumes that the university's
enrollment and revenue growth strategy achieve some success,
stabilizing revenues with growth in the intermediate term resulting
in modestly improved AF to adjusted debt in the out years at
approximately 25%.

Fitch's stress case reflects a moderate and plausible economic
stress to Immaculata's investment portfolio. The stress scenario
results in an initial investment decline of approximately 12%, with
AF to adjusted debt declining to around 20% and remaining below
historical levels throughout the forward look. Both of Fitch's
cases assume no material new borrowing and incorporate expectations
for donor support of capital initiatives, consistent with recent
performance, and capital investment levels around annual
depreciation.

Fitch calculated a thin 0.6x current debt service coverage for
fiscal 2019. Insufficient coverage and thin AF to operating
expenses are an Asymmetric Rating Factor Consideration in assessing
Immaculata's financial profile. Immaculata reported 1.9x debt
service coverage per its covenant for fiscal 2019, which is
unaudited. This is well above the required covenant test of 1.2x in
fiscal 2019. The substantially higher coverage based on the
covenant calculation is from the recognition of non-operating
activities, which Fitch does not count towards funds available for
debt service.

In addition to the sources of information identified in Fitch's
applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by
information from Lumesis.

ESG Considerations

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of 3 - ESG issues are credit
neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either
due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by
the entity.


JERRY LEE HARTLEY: $2.5M Sale of Funeral Home to DET Approved
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina
authorized Jerry Lee Hartley's private sale of (i) his 100%
membership interest in Jerry L. Hartley Funeral Home, LLC located
at 684 Hubbard Dr., Lancaster, South Carolina; (ii) furnishings,
fixtures, and equipment belonging to funeral home; (iii) inventory
belonging to funeral home; and (iv) 6.397 acres with improvements
Titled in the name of the Debtor, TMS# 0062-00-039.01, where he
operates the funeral home, to DET Corp. Group, Inc. for $2.5
million.

The sale is free and clear of liens.

The liens claimed by Lancaster County, South Carolina, Truist Bank,
formerly known as Branch Banking and Trust, and the South Carolina
Department of Revenue against said property will be paid upon the
sale of said property.

Jerry Lee Hartley sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.S.C. Case
No. 19-02994) on June 3, 2019.  The Debtor tapped Reid B. Smith,
Esq., at Bird & Smith, PA as counsel.


JIMLYN ENTERPRISES: March 5 Plan & Disclosures Hearing Set
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Paul R. Warren of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of New York granted the motion of debtor Jimlyn
Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Bathtub Billy's for conditional approval of
the Disclosure Statement at a hearing on Jan. 23, 2020, and
established the following dates and deadlines:

  * March 5, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, 100
State Street, Rochester, NY 14614 is the hearing on final approval
of the Disclosure Statement and the hearing on confirmation of the
Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan.

  * Feb. 28, 2020, is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to final approval of the Disclosure Statement
and confirmation of the Plan.

  * Feb. 28, 2020, is fixed as the last day for filing proofs of
claim in this case.

  * Feb. 28, 2020, is fixed as the last day for filing proofs of
claim for governmental unit creditors.

  * Ballots accepting or rejecting the Plan may be filed at any
time before the confirmation hearing or any continuation thereof.

A full-text copy of the order dated Jan. 23, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/w8xfrn5 from PacerMonitor at no charge.

                   About Jimlyn Enterprises

Jimlyn Enterprises, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition(Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-20309) on April 4, 2019,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The
Debtor is represented by Raymond C. Stilwell, Esq., at the Law
Offices Of Raymond C. Stilwell.


KINGMAN FARMS: Up to $650K Equity Investment to Fund 100% Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
KINGMAN FARMS VENTURES, LLC, has a reorganization plan that
provides for its existing old equity interests to be cancelled and
100% of the new membership interests in the Reorganized Debtor to
be issued pro rata to the "new equity investor" in exchange for
providing the New Capital Contribution of an amount not less than
$500,000, but not to exceed $650,000 which will be used to satisfy
Claims under the Plan.

Class 5 General Unsecured Claims, totaling $146,969, are
unimpaired.  The Holder of the Allowed Loftin Secured Claim shall,
in full satisfaction, settlement, release and exchange for such
Allowed Loftin Secured Claim and Lien, and after tender of an
executed release of such Lien, receive cash in the Allowed amount
of such Loftin Secured Claim on the Effective Date. The Class 3
Allowed Loftin Secured Claim is not Impaired and the Holder of the
Allowed Loftin Secured Claim is not entitled to vote to accept or
reject the Plan.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement dated
February 5, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/wq6wmbd from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for the Debtor:

     NEDDA GHANDI, ESQ.
     LAURA A. DEETER, ESQ
     SHARA L. LARSON, ESQ.
     GHANDI DEETER BLACKHAM
     725 South 8th Street, Suite 100
     Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
     Telephone: (702) 878-1115
                (702) 281-5163
     Facsimile: (702) 979-2485
     E-mail: nedda@ghandilaw.com
     E-mail: laura@ghandilaw.com
     E-mail: shara@ghandilaw.com

                About Kingman Farms Ventures

Kingman Farms Ventures, LLC, is a privately-held company that
operates in the crop farms industry located in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Kingman Farms Ventures sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 18-10180) on Jan. 16,
2018.  In the petition signed by James R. Rhodes, president of
Truckee Springs Holdings, Inc., manager of the Debtor, the Debtor
was estimated to have assets and liabilities of $10 million to $50
million.  Judge Laurel E. Davis is the presiding judge.  Deeter
Blackham is the Debtor's legal counsel.


L.A. VINAS: Unsecureds Owed $1.46M to Get $30K in 5 Years in Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor L.A. Vinas, M.D., P.A. filed an Amended Disclosure Statement
describing its Plan of Reorganization dated January 23, 2020.

The principal of the Debtor, Luis A. Vinas, M.D. filed relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on October 4, 2019, resulting in
case number 19-23352-MAM. A separate Plan of Reorganization and
Disclosure Statement will be filed in that case.

Central to L.A. Vinas' Plan of Reorganization is a merger of the
Debtor with the Med Spa.  The Med Spa operates with positive net
cash flow and, prior to the filing of this case, the Med Spa was
often infusing funds into the Debtor or paying Debtor expenses.
The Debtor and the Med Spa are inherently interrelated as both
businesses operate at the same location. Dr. Vinas, the principal
of the Debtor, performs and/or oversees all services provided at
The Med Spa.

The projections attached to this Disclosure Statement contemplate
the merger and the combined income and expenses.  These projections
were prepared by the accountant, Venita Ackerman, C.P.A., who is
employed by the estate in this case.  At the time of the filing of
this document, the accountant is in the process of finalizing the
final full year 2019 Profit and Loss Statement for the Med Spa.
The Med Spa does not have any separate debt. This merger will be
effective upon confirmation of this case.

General Unsecured Claims in Class 8, totaling $1,464,418, will be
paid over the five-year term of the Plan at the rate of $500 per
month on a pro rata basis.  The payments will commence on the
Effective Date of the Plan.

There shall be no distribution to the equity holders under the
confirmed Plan and no dividends to this class. These claims are
impaired.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated Jan. 23,
2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yx7pe8qt from
PacerMonitor at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

        KELLEY, FULTON & KAPLAN, P.A.
        DANA KAPLAN, ESQUIRE
        1665 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
        The Forum - Suite 1000
        West Palm Beach, FL 33401
        Tel: (561) 491-1200
        Fax: (561) 684-3773

                        About L.A. Vinas

Based in West Palm Beach, Florida, L.A. Vinas, M.D., P.A., owns
plastic surgery, med spa & skin care centers. It offers breast
augmentation, body contouring, liposuction, breast lift, face lift,
gynecomastia, tummy tuck, facial, and butt lift services.  

The Company previously sought bankruptcy protection on April 17,
2017 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-14765).

L.A. Vinas, M.D., P.A., again filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-17065) on May 29, 2019.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtor estimated $0 to $50,000 in assets and $1 million
to $10 million in liabilities. Judge Erik P. Kimball oversees the
case.  Kelley, Fulton & Kaplan, P.L., is the Debtor's legal
counsel.

The U.S. Trustee, until further notice, will not appoint an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of
L.A. Vinas.


LEGRACE CORP: Unsecureds Will be Paid on Installments
-----------------------------------------------------
Legrace Corp. filed a Disclosure Statement in support of its Plan
of Reorganization.  Unsecured creditors owed $187,221 will have a 0
percent distribution under the Plan.

The Disclosure Statement says that the Debtor will have $4,000 in
cash on the effective date.  The Debtor estimates that projected
monthly disposable income available to creditors for the 5 year
period following confirmation will be $825.72.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated February 5,
2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/vae5b9u from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtor:

     Julie J. Villabos
     10900 183rd Street, Suite 270
     Cerritos, CA 90703
     Tel: (562)741-3938
     Fax: (888)408-2210
     E-mail: Julie@oaktreaalaw.com

                     About Legrace Corp.

Based in Orange, California, Legrace Corp. filed its voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-12812) on July 22,
2019, estimating up to $100,000 in assets and up to $1 million in
liabilities.  Julie J. Villalobos at Oaktree Law is the Debtor's
counsel.


LIGHTHOUSE HOSPITALITY: Unsec. Creditors to Get 100% in 5 Years
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Lighthouse Hospitality LLC filed a First Amended Plan of
Reorganization and a corresponding Disclosure Statement.

According to the First Amended Disclosure Statement, holders of
Class 6 Convenience Class (Allowed general unsecured claims less
than $600 each), comprising 10 claims totaling approximately
$2,864, will receive $2,864 without interest paid in cash in full
on Effective Date.

Class 7 Allowed general unsecured claims greater than $600 each,
comprising 7 claims totaling approximately $26,069, will be paid in
full in quarterly payments of about $1,357 commencing July 15,
2020, which includes interest at the federal judgment rate as of
confirmation on a five-year amortization; the balance remaining at
closing will be paid in full with interest to date of payment when
funds are available from Closing.

The Debtor shall continue to employ real estate agent Betty
Zollshan of William Pitt Sotheby's to market Debtor's inn for sale
and, upon entering a contract will issue a Notice of Sale to all
parties in interest.

From operation of the Debtor's business, the Debtor shall fund each
monthly and quarterly payment pending closing on a sale of all of
Debtor's assets. Payments and distributions under the Plan will be
funded from operations of the inn and insurance recoveries.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement dated
Jan. 21, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/sa249n2 from
PacerMonitor at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

     Carl T. Gulliver
     Coan, Lewendon, Gulliver & Miltenberger, LLC
     495 Orange Street
     New Haven, CT 06511
     Telephone: (203) 624-4756
     Facsimile: (203) 865-3673
     E-mail: cgulliver@coanlewendon.com

                About Lighthouse Hospitality

Lighthouse Hospitality LLC, which conducts business as Tidewater
Inn, operates a three-star hotel in Madison, Connecticut.  The
hotel's guestrooms have a private en-suite bathroom with a shower,
air conditioning, cable television, and wireless internet access.

Lighthouse Hospitality sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 19-30387) on March 14,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of less than $1
million.  The case is assigned to Judge Ann M. Nevins. Coan,
Lewendon, Gulliver & Miltenberger, LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


MATRA PETROLEUM: Exclusivity Period Extended to March 27
--------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas
extended the exclusive periods during which Matra Petroleum USA,
Inc. and its affiliates can file and confirm a Chapter 11 plan to
March 27 and May 26, respectively.

During the pendency of their bankruptcy cases, the companies sold,
with court approval, substantially all assets through an auction
process whereby their senior secured lender, Bjorger Resources,
LLC, made a credit bid.  However, the companies were unable to sell
approximately 140 wells or leases and are now seeking new operators
for the wells. Bjorger is also contemplating taking some of the
wells. Thus, the companies must finalize a plan of disposition for
these wells and determine any potential liability before a plan can
be proposed.

                      About Matra Petroleum

Matra Petroleum USA Inc. and its subsidiaries are Houston-based
independent oil and gas companies focusing on oil and gas
production.  The companies sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 19-34190) on July 31, 2019.  

Matra Petroleum USA estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets
and $50 million to $100 million in liabilities.  As of July 1,
2019, the Debtors had combined secured debt in excess of $70
million, secured by liens on substantially all of the Debtors'
assets, cash and equity.  Judge David R. Jones oversees the case.


The Debtors tapped Hoover Slovacek LLP as their legal counsel, and
Macco Restructuring Group, LLC as their financial advisor.


MB CONTRACT TELEPHONE: Seeks to Hire Cutright as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
MB Contract Telephone Company, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Illinois to hire
Cutright & Cutright Law Office as its legal counsel.
   
Cutright will advise the Debtor of its rights, powers and duties
under the Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services in
connection with its Chapter 11 case.

John Cutright, Esq., the firm's attorney who will be handling the
case, charges an hourly fee of $225.  Paralegals charge $50 per
hour.

The Debtor has agreed to pay the firm a $2,000 retainer.

Mr. Cutright neither holds nor represents any interest adverse to
the interest of the Debtor's bankruptcy estate, according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     John O. Cutright, Esq.
     Cutright & Cutright Law Office
     P.O. Box 97
     Toeldo, IL 62468
     Phone: (217) 849-3311
     Email: c.law.clients@gmail.com

                About MB Contract Telephone Company

MB Contract Telephone Company, Inc. sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ill. Case No. 19-60455) on
Dec. 10, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated
assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $50,000.
Judge Laura K. Grandy oversees the case.  The Debtor tapped
Cutright & Cutright Law Office as its legal counsel, and Sager
Financial Services as its accountant.


MB CONTRACT TELEPHONE: Taps Sager Financial Services as Accountant
------------------------------------------------------------------
MB Contract Telephone Company, Inc., received approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Illinois to hire
Sager Financial Services as its accountant.
   
The firm will assist the Debtor in the preparation of tax returns
and will provide financial support services, which include the
preparation of financial reports required by the court and
financial details for the Debtor's cash flow analysis and proposed
Chapter 11 plan.

Doug Sager, the firm's accountant who will be providing the
services, will be paid an hourly fee of $35 for financial support
services.

Mr. Sager is "disinterested" within the meaning of Section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

Sager Financial Services can be reached through:

     Doug Sager
     Sager Financial Services
     655 West Lincoln Avenue, Suite 6
     Charleston, IL 61920
     Phone: 217-348-8812
     Fax: 217-348-8612
     Email: sagerfinancial@gmail.com

                About MB Contract Telephone Company

MB Contract Telephone Company, Inc. sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ill. Case No. 19-60455) on
Dec. 10, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated
assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $50,000.
Judge Laura K. Grandy oversees the case.  The Debtor tapped
Cutright & Cutright Law Office as its legal counsel, and Sager
Financial Services as its accountant.


MC CLOUD TRUCKING: Has Until Feb. 24 to File Plan & Disclosures
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Mc Cloud Trucking, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Wilmington Division, a
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on
November 25, 2019.

The court has reviewed the case file and has determined that to
ensure that the case is handled expeditiously and economically, the
Debtor must file a plan and disclosure statement on or before Feb.
24, 2020.  

A copy of the order dated Jan. 21, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/wpt9w96 from PacerMonitor at no charge.

                  About Mc Cloud Trucking

Mc Cloud Trucking, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 19-05436) on Nov. 25,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of between $100,001 and $500,000 and liabilities of between
$500,001 and $1 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Joseph N.
Callaway.  The Debtor is represented by Jonathan E. Friesen, Esq.,
at Gillespie & Murphy, P.A.


MCCLATCHY COMPANY: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: The McClatchy Company
             2100 Q Street
             Sacramento, CA 95816

Business Description: McClatchy operates 30 media companies in 14
                      states, providing each of its communities
                      local journalism in the public interest and
                      advertising services in a wide array of
                      digital and print formats.  McClatchy
                      publishes iconic local brands including the
                      Miami Herald, The Kansas City Star, The
                      Sacramento Bee, The Charlotte Observer, The
                      (Raleigh) News & Observer and the Fort Worth
                      Star-Telegram.  McClatchy is headquartered
                      in Sacramento, Calif., and listed on the New
                      York Stock Exchange American under the
                      symbol MNI.  Visit https://www.mcclatchy.com
                      for more information.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 13, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of New York

Fifty-four affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions
for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:
  
  Debtor                                                 Case No.
  ------                                                 --------
  The McClatchy Company (Lead Case)                     
20‐10418
  Aboard Publishing, Inc.                               
20‐10419
  Bellingham Herald Publishing, LLC                     
20‐10420
  Belton Publishing Company, Inc.                       
20‐10421
  Biscayne Bay Publishing, Inc.                         
20‐10422
  Cass County Publishing Company                        
20‐10423
  Columbus‐Ledger Enquirer,Inc.                         
20‐10424
  Cypress Media, Inc.                                   
20‐10417
  Cypress Media, LLC                                    
20‐10425
  East Coast Newspapers, Inc.                           
20‐10426
  El Dorado Newspapers                                  
20‐10427
  Gulf Publishing Company, Inc.                         
20‐10428
  Herald Custom Publishing of Mexico, S.de R.L. de C.V.
20‐10429
  HLB Newspapers, Inc.                                  
20‐10430
  Idaho Statesman Publishing,LLC                        
20‐10431
  Keltatim Publishing Company, Inc.                     
20‐10432
  Keynoter Publishing Company, Inc.                     
20‐10433
  Lee's Summit Journal, Incorporated                    
20‐10434
  Lexington H‐L Services, Inc.                          
20‐10435
  Macon Telegraph Publishing Company                    
20‐10436
  Mail Advertising Corporation                          
20‐10437
  McClatchy Big Valley, Inc.                            
20‐10438
  McClatchy Interactive LLC                             
20‐10439
  McClatchy Interactive West                            
20‐10440
  McClatchy International Inc.                          
20‐10441
  McClatchy Investment Company                          
20‐10442
  McClatchy Management Services, Inc.                   
20‐10443
  McClatchy News Services, Inc.                         
20‐10445
  McClatchy Newspapers, Inc.                            
20‐10444
  McClatchy Property, Inc.                              
20‐10446
  McClatchy Resources, Inc.                             
20‐10447
  McClatchy Shared Services, Inc.                       
20‐10448
  McClatchy U.S.A., Inc.                                
20‐10449
  Miami Herald Media Company                            
20‐10450
  N&O Holdings, Inc.                                    
20‐10451
  Newsprint Ventures, Inc.                              
20‐10452
  Nittany Printing and Publishing Company               
20‐10453
  Nor‐Tex Publishing, Inc.                              
20‐10454
  Olympian Publishing, LLC                              
20‐10455
  Olympic‐Cascade Publishing, Inc.                      
20‐10456
  Pacific Northwest Publishing Company, Inc.            
20‐10457
  Quad County Publishing, Inc.                          
20‐10458
  San Luis Obispo Tribune, LLC                          
20‐10459
  Star‐Telegram, Inc.                                   
20‐10460
  Tacoma News, Inc.                                     
20‐10461
  The Bradenton Herald, Inc.                            
20‐10462
  The Charlotte Observer Publishing Company             
20‐10463
  The News & Observer Publishing Co.                    
20‐10464
  The State Media Company                               
20‐10465
  The Sun Publishing Company, Inc.                      
20‐10466
  Tribune Newsprint Company                             
20‐10467
  TruMeasure, LLC                                       
20‐10468
  Wichita Eagle and Beacon Publishing Company, Inc.     
20‐10469
  Wingate Paper Company                                 
20‐10470

Judge: Hon. Michael E. Wiles

Debtors'
General
Bankruptcy
Counsel:          Shana A. Elberg, Esq.
                  Bram A. Strochlic, Esq.
                  SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
                  Four Times Square
                  New York, New York 10036-6522
                  Tel: (212) 735-3000
                  Fax: (212) 735-2000
                  Email: shana.elberg@skadden.com
                         bram.strochlic@skadden.com

                    - and –

                  Van C. Durrer, II, Esq.
                  Destiny N. Almogue, Esq.
                  300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3400
                  Los Angeles, California 90071-3144
                  Tel: (213) 687-5000
                  Fax: (213) 687-5600
                  Email: van.durrer@skadden.com
                         destiny.almogue@skadden.com

                    - and –

                  Jennifer Madden, Esq.
                  525 University Avenue
                  Palo Alto, California 94301
                  Tel: (650) 470-4500
                  Fax: (650) 470-4570
                  Email: jennifer.madden@skadden.com

Debtors'
Bankruptcy
Co-Counsel:       Albert Togut, Esq.
                  Kyle J. Ortiz, Esq.
                  Amy Oden, Esq.
                  TOGUT, SEGAL & SEGAL LLP
                  One Penn Plaza, Suite 3335
                  New York, New York 10119
                  Tel: (212) 594-5000
                  Fax: (212) 967-4258
                  Email: altogut@TeamTogut.com
                         kortiz@teamtogut.com
                         aoden@teamtogut.com

Debtors'
Special
Counsel:          GROOM LAW GROUP

Debtors'
Financial
Advisor:          FTI CONSULTING, INC.

Debtors'
Investment
Banker:           EVERCORE INC.

Debtors'
Provider of
Noticing,
Claims Management &
Reconciliation,
Plan Solicitation,
Balloting, and
Disbursement
Services:         KURTZMAN CARSON CONSULTANTS LLC
                  https://www.kccllc.net/mcclatchy

Estimated Assets: $500 million to $1 billion

Estimated Liabilities: $1 billion to $10 billion

The petition was signed by Elaine R. Lintecum, vice president of
finance, chief financial officer, assistant secretary, and
treasurer.

A full-text copy of The McClatchy Company's petition is available
for free at PacerMonitor.com at:

                         https://is.gd/XOgfoP

Consolidated List of Debtors' 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Pension Benefit Guaranty                           $530,352,623
Corporation
Attn: Accounts Payable
1200 K Street NW 12th Floor
Washington, DC 20005

2. Bank of New York Mellon                             $14,900,000
One Wall Street
New York, NY 10286

3. Gannett Supply Corporation                           $1,646,978
7950 Jones Branch Drive
McLean, VA 22107

4. Wipro Limited                                        $1,439,122
2 Tower Center Blvd
East Brunswick, NJ 08816
Email: ruchika.aggarwal@wipro.com

5. Google Inc.                                            $800,000
1600 Amphitheater Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
Email: legal-notices@google.com

6. Dallas Morning News                                    $669,851
508 Young Street
Dallas, TX 75202
Email: cgarrett@dmnmedia.com

7. Endava Inc.                                            $664,818
757 3rd Ave Suite 1901
New York, NY 10017
Email: accounts.receivable@endava.com

8. Alorica Inc.                                           $541,490
400 Horsham Road Ste 130
Horsham, PA 19044
Email: MarkAlWaren.Gamboa@alorica.com

9. Andrew Distribution Inc.                               $495,055
PO Box 1099
Melrose Park, IL 60161
Fax: (630) 839-0424

10. Simpli Fi Holdings Inc.                               $490,000
3003 Tasman Dr
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Email: receivables@simpli.fi

11. Brightcove Inc.                                       $294,044
290 Congress Street
Boston, MA 02210

12. Facebook Inc.                                         $257,713
315 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
Email: ar@fb.com

13. Adobe Systems, Inc.                                   $232,766
560 Mission St Floor 5
San Francisco, CA 94105
Email: remittance@adobe.com

14. LinkedIn Corporation                                  $230,385
2029 Stierlin Court
Mountain View, CA 94043

15. Dow Jones And Co Inc.                                 $191,835
4300 US Rt. 1 North
Monmouth Junction, NJ 08852

16. Times News                                            $155,943
c/o Lee Advertising
PO Box 4690
Carol Stream, IL 60197
Fax: (319) 291-4014

17. Bulkley Dunton Publishing Group                       $144,985
613 Main Street
Wilmington, MA 1887

18. Gary Pruitt                                           $127,962
101 Warren Street #1110
New York, NY 10007

19. Johnson Controls                                      $126,440
4415 Sea Ray Dr
Charleston, SC 29405

20. Infosys BPM                                           $107,537
6100 Tennyson Parkway
Suite 200
Plano, TX 75024

21. Jobvite Inc.                                          $106,981
1300 S El Camino Real #400
San Mateo, CA 94402

22. Solo Printing Inc.                                    $103,332
7860 NW 66th St
Miami, FL 33166

23. Tribune Direct                                        $102,084
435 N Michigan Ave
Chicago, IL 60611

24. Datamatics Technologies                               $101,500
31572 Industrial Road Ste 100
Livonia, MI 48150

25. Adswerve, Inc                                         $100,000
999 18th Street Ste 1555N
Denver, CO 80202

26. Site Impact LLC                                       $100,000
6119 Lyons Road
Coconut Creek, FL 33073

27. Socialflow Inc                                        $100,000
52 Vanderbilt Ave 12th Floor
New York, NY 10017

28. Ryder Integrated Logistics                             $99,599
24610 Network Place
Chicago, IL 60673

29. USA Today                                              $98,865
PO Box 677460
Dallas, TX 75267

30. Solutions Through Software Inc.                        $98,344
2295 S Hiawassee Rd Ste 208
Orlando, FL 32835


MCCLATCHY COMPANY: Files for Chapter 11 with Plan
-------------------------------------------------
The McClatchy Co., one of the largest newspaper publishers in the
U.S., has sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection with a
debt-for-equity plan that will cut funded debt by half to $350
million.

"The Plan provides for an equitable distribution of recoveries to
the Debtors' creditors, preserves the value of the Debtors'
business as a going concern, and preserves the jobs of employees.
The Debtors believe that any alternative to confirmation of the
Plan, such as liquidation or attempts by another party in interest
to file a plan, could result in significant delays, litigation and
costs, the loss of jobs by the Debtors' employees, and/or impaired
recoveries.  Moreover, the Debtors believe that the Debtors'
creditors will receive greater and earlier recoveries under the
Plan than those that would be achieved in liquidation or under an
alternative plan.  For these reasons, the Debtors urge you to
return your ballot accepting the Plan," McClatchy said in the
Disclosure Statement explaining the terms of the Plan.

                    Well-Respected Publications

McClatchy is a 163-year-old family-controlled public company that
provides independent local journalism to 30 communities in 14
states through its local newspapers, including well-respected
publications such as the Miami Herald, The Kansas City Star, The
Sacramento Bee, The Charlotte Observer, The(Raleigh) News &
Observer, and the (Fort Worth) Star-Telegram, as well as national
news coverage through its Washington, D.C. bureau. McClatchy also
provides a full suite of digital marketing services, through its
local sales teams and excelerate, its full-service national digital
marketing agency that provides digital marketing tools designed to
customize digital marketing plans for its customers

For the full year ended Dec. 29, 2019, McClatchy had an average
aggregate paid daily circulation of 1.1 million and a Sunday print
circulation of 1.5million, in addition to 55.7 million average
monthly unique visitors to its online platforms, 3.4 billion page
views of its digital product -- reflecting a 114% increase of
digital-only subscribers between Q4 2017 and Q4 2019, a 10%
sequential increase in digital-only subscribers for the
15thconsecutive quarter of growth, and an 18% increase at the end
of Q4 2019 as compared to Q4 2018.

"Throughout this Chapter 11 process, we will maintain the same
unwavering commitment to delivering the strong, independent
journalism that is essential to our local communities," said Craig
Forman, CEO of the Debtors.

                   $703 Million of Funded Debt

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors' principal funded debt
obligations totaled $703.3 million:

                              Pro Forma ($ millions)
                              ----------------------
Secured Debt
  ABL Facility-First Lien Notes      $262.9
  Second Lien Term Loan              $157.1
  Third Lien Notes                   $268.4
                                   --------
  Total Secured Debt                 $688.4

Unsecured Debt
  2027 Debentures                      $7.1
  2029 Debentures                      $7.8
                                   --------
  Total Unsecured Debt                $14.9
                                   --------
  Total Funded Debt                  $703.3

McClatchy administers a qualified pension plan covered by the PBGC
that was established in 1944 that, as of Jan. 1, 2019, covered
nearly 24,500 current and future retirees. With each successive
acquisition of a business, throughout the 1990's and into the
2000's, McClatchy likewise assumed the pension plan applicable to
the employees and retirees of the acquired company.

Despite the declining revenues that McClatchy has experienced since
2006, the Company has continued to make both mandatory and
voluntary contributions to the Pension Plan. In the past 15 years,
the Company has contributed cash and/or property of more than $530
million to the pension plan.  As of Jan. 1, 2019, the Pension Plan
was underfunded by $323.6 million based on the standards required
by the Internal Revenue Code for non-terminated pension plans.

                          Terms of Plan

The Plan provides for the following key economic terms and
mechanics:

  A. Issuance of New First Lien Notes. On the Effective Date,
Reorganized McClatchy will authorize and issue new 10.000% Senior
Secured Notes due 2026 pursuant to the New First Lien Notes
Indenture by and among Reorganized McClatchy, as issuer, the
subsidiary guarantor parties thereto, and the First Lien Notes
Agent, on terms substantially similar to those contained in the
First Lien Notes Indenture, subject to certain modifications.

  B. Issuance of Reorganized Equity: On the Effective Date,
Reorganized McClatchy will authorize and issue the Reorganized
Equity.  The 97% of the Reorganized Equity will be distributed to
holders of Second Lien/Third Lien Claims and 3% of the Reorganized
Equity will be distributed to holders of PBGC Claims, each subject
to dilution from the MIP Equity and the Warrant Equity.

  C. Cancellation of Old McClatchy Securities, Agreements, and the
Second Lien Term Loan: Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, on
the Effective Date, the 2027 Debentures, the 2029 Debentures, the
First Lien Notes, the Third Lien Notes and the Existing Parent
Equity, and all options, warrants, rights and other instruments
evidencing an ownership interest in the Debtors (whether fixed or
contingent, matured or unmatured, disputed or undisputed),
contractual, legal, equitable, or otherwise, to acquire any of the
foregoing(collectively, the "Old McClatchy Securities"), as well as
the Second Lien Term Loan and all instruments and documents
relating thereto, shall be cancelled, and any obligations of,
Claims against, and/or Interests in the Debtors under, relating, or
pertaining to the foregoing, will be released and discharged and
cancelled.

  D. Exit Financing: On the Effective Date, the Reorganized
Debtors, as borrowers, will enter into the Exit Facilities,
comprising (i) a $50 million asset-based revolving credit facility
(the "Exit ABL Facility") and (ii) anew 1.5 lien term loan facility
in the aggregate principal net amount of $81 million, consisting of
(a) the conversion of the Subordinated Chatham Notes Claims to term
loans thereunder, and (b) $30 million of new money financing
provided by certain of the Chatham Parties, or affiliates thereof,
as well as an aggregate principal amount of 7.000% of original
issue discount (the "Exit 1.5L Facility").

  E. Unsecured Creditors: Unsecured Creditors will receive their
pro rata portion of Reorganized McClatchy Warrants for up to 2.5%
of the Reorganized Equity or their pro rata portion of Cash in the
aggregate amount of $3,000,000.

The Reorganized Debtors' debt at emergence will comprise of the
following: (i) the $50 million Exit ABL Facility, (ii) the Exit
1.5L Facility in the aggregate principal net amount of $81 million,
and (iii) $217.9 million in principal amount of the New First Lien
Notes.  At emergence, the Reorganized Debtors anticipate having
liquidity of approximately $34 million due to a combination of
cash-on-hand and availability under the Exit Facilities.

                   News Industry Headwinds

The company purchased Knight-Ridder, Inc. in 2006, adding 20
newspapers to its portfolio and, in so doing, taking on $5.0
billion in debt to consummate the transaction. The company had an
investment grade rating from both Moody's Investor Services and
Standard & Poor's at the time of the acquisition. Similarly, the
debt to finance the transaction was rated investment grade by both
such credit rating agencies.

The Great Recession (commencing in 2007)and the impact of internet
journalism and alternative digital advertising sources have
undermined the revenue model of the entire news industry. Between
2006 and 2018, McClatchy's advertising revenues fell by 80%. Local
news outlets in particular were hard hit, as the internet and entry
of new digital advertising platforms forced major disruptions in
the traditional print advertising industry; news and advertising
were no longer being distributed and sold according to geographic
location. In addition, paid print circulation volume and print
audience have steadily decreased over the same period; between 2006
and 2018, total daily print circulation fell by 58.6%. This decline
in daily circulation and associated revenues is reflective of the
fragmentation of audiences faced by all media companies.  McClatchy
has responded to these trends by exploring synergies through
purchases or sales, implementing a business plan that focuses on a
shift to digital news circulation and subscriptions, digital
advertising, and strategically implementing cost-cutting
initiatives.

"The media industry has been under tremendous pressure for years.
Technological advances, consumer-behavior shifts, and
business-model challenges are among the many disruptive forces
affecting the media business.  We believe the actions we have taken
are an important step to ensure a strong future for McClatchy, and
we look forward to emerging from this process in the next few
months with a stronger financial foundation. At that time, we
expect to be even better positioned to advance our digital
transformation and continue delivering essential local news to our
subscribers and readers in the communities we serve," Mr. Forman
said.

                       About McClatchy Co.

The McClatchy Co. -- https://www.mcclatchy.com/ -- operates 30
media companies in 14 states, providing each of its communities
local journalism in the public interest and advertising services in
a wide array of digital and print formats. McClatchy publishes
iconic local brands including the Miami Herald, The Kansas City
Star, The Sacramento Bee, The Charlotte Observer, The (Raleigh)
News & Observer, and the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. McClatchy is
headquartered in Sacramento, Calif., and listed on the New York
Stock Exchange American under the symbol MNI.

On Feb. 13, 2020, The McClatchy Company and 53 affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-10418) with
a Plan of Reorganization that will cut $700 million of funded debt
in half.

McClatchy was estimated to have $500 million to $1 billion in
assets and debt of at least $1 billion as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The cases are pending before the Honorable Michael E. Wiles.

The Debtors tapped SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP as
general bankruptcy counsel; TOGUT, SEGAL & SEGAL LLP as
co-bankruptcy counsel; GROOM LAW GROUP as special counsel; FTI
CONSULTING, INC., as financial advisor; and EVERCORE INC. as
investment banker.  KURTZMAN CARSON CONSULTANTS LLC is the claims
agent.


MCCLATCHY COMPANY: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 1.6% in Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
The McClatchy Co. has a reorganization plan that provides for
unsecured creditors to receive their pro rata portion of warrants
for up to 2.5% of the Reorganized Equity of McClatchy Co. or their
pro rata portion of cash in the aggregate amount of $3,000,000.
The class is slated to have a 1.6% recovery under the Plan.

While unsecured creditors are slated to have a recovery of less
than 2 cents on the dollar, holders of unsecured claims classified
as "go-forward trade claims" are slated to have a 100% recovery.

The Plan defines a Go-Forward Trade Claim as a claim that is
neither secured by collateral nor entitled to priority under the
Bankruptcy Code or any order of the Bankruptcy Court and has been
identified by the Debtors, in consultation with the Supporting
Parties, as being integral to and necessary for the ongoing
operations of the Reorganized Debtors.

Holders of Go-Forward Trade Claims totaling $14 million will each
have its claim reinstated or be paid in full in cash in the
ordinary course.

The PBGC asserts Claims arising from the settlement of the
termination premium incurred in connection with the distress
termination of the Debtors'  qualified defined benefit pension
plan.  The Claim will be Allowed in an amount to be agreed among
the PBGC, the Supporting Parties and the Debtors; and are slated
for a 4% recovery.

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9019 and in full and final
satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of and in exchange
for the Allowed Class 7 Claims, PBGC will receive (i) a $33 million
secured note due on the 13th anniversary of the  Effective Date
that will provide for annual amortization payments commencing in
2023 (the "PBGC Note"), provided, however, that if the Effective
Date occurs within 45 days of the Petition Date, then the PBGC Note
will be due on the 10th anniversary of the Effective Date and the
annual amortization payments will commence on the one month
anniversary of the Effective Date; and (ii) 3% of the Reorganized
Equity (subject to dilution by the MIP Equity and the Warrant
Equity).  The liens on and security interests in the Reorganized
Debtors' assets granted pursuant to the PBGC Note shall be junior
in all respects to the liens and security interests provided for
under the Exit Facilities and the New First Lien Notes.  To the
extent there is any modification to the above treatment of the PBGC
Claim, such treatment will be agreed upon by the Debtors and the
Chatham Parties, and the Brigade Parties must also consent to such
treatment (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or
conditioned).

Projected recoveries for other classes of creditors in the Plan
are:

   Class   Type of Claim/Interest    Treatment   Recovery
   -----   ----------------------    ---------   --------
    1   Other Priority Claims        Unimpaired     100%
    2   Other Secured Claims         Unimpaired     100%
    3   ABL Credit Facility Claims   Unimpaired     100%
    4   First Lien Notes Claims      Impaired       100%
    5   Second Lien/3rd Lien Claims  Impaired    Unknown
    6   Go-Forward Trade Claims      Unimpaired     100%
    7   PBGC Claims                  Impaired         4%
    8   General Unsecured Claims     Impaired        1.6%
    9   Intercompany Claims          Unimpaired   0-100%
   10   Intercompany Interests       Unimpaired   0-100%
   11   Subordinated Claims          Impaired         0%
   12   Existing Parent Equity       Impaired         0%

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/McClatchy_27_Disc_Statement.pdf

                       About McClatchy Co.

The McClatchy Co. -- https://www.mcclatchy.com/ -- operates 30
media companies in 14 states, providing each of its communities
local journalism in the public interest and advertising services in
a wide array of digital and print formats. McClatchy publishes
iconic local brands including the Miami Herald, The Kansas City
Star, The Sacramento Bee, The Charlotte Observer, The (Raleigh)
News & Observer, and the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. McClatchy is
headquartered in Sacramento, Calif., and listed on the New York
Stock Exchange American under the symbol MNI.

On Feb. 13, 2020, The McClatchy Company and 53 affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-10418) with
a Plan of Reorganization that will cut $700 million of funded debt
in half.

McClatchy was estimated to have $500 million to $1 billion in
assets and debt of at least $1 billion as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The cases are pending before the Honorable Michael E. Wiles.

The Debtors tapped SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP as
general bankruptcy counsel; TOGUT, SEGAL & SEGAL LLP as
co-bankruptcy counsel; GROOM LAW GROUP as special counsel; FTI
CONSULTING, INC., as financial advisor; and EVERCORE INC. as
investment banker.  KURTZMAN CARSON CONSULTANTS LLC is the claims
agent.


MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL: March 12 Plan & Disclosures Hearing Set
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtors McDermott International, Inc., et al., filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston
Division, an emergency motion for entry of an order approving the
confirmation schedule and approving form of notice of the Sale
Dates and Deadlines.

On Jan.23, 2020, Judge David R. Jones ordered that:

  * March 12, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. is the Combined Hearing, at which
time the Court will consider, among other things, the adequacy of
the Disclosure Statement, confirmation of the Plan, and approval of
the Sale.

  * March 2, 2020, at 4:00 p.m. is the deadline to file any
objections to adequacy of the Disclosure Statement and confirmation
of the Plan.

  * March 9, 2020, at 4:00 p.m., is the deadline to file any brief
in support of confirmation of the Plan and reply to any
objections.

  * Jan. 24, 2020, as the start of the subscription period and
February 19, 2020, at 4:00 p.m. as the Subscription Expiration
Deadline.

A full-text copy of the order and plan dated Jan. 23, 2020, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/tuhur9x from PacerMonitor at no
charge.

The Debtors are represented by:

         JACKSON WALKER L.L.P.
         Matthew D. Cavenaugh
         Jennifer F. Wertz
         Kristhy M. Peguero
         Veronica A. Polnick
         1401 McKinney Street, Suite 1900
         Houston, Texas 77010
         Telephone: (713) 752-4200
         Facsimile: (713) 752-4221
         E-mail: mcavenaugh@jw.com
                 jwertz@jw.com
                 kpeguero@jw.com
                 vpolnick@jw.com

               - and -

          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
          Joshua A. Sussberg, P.C.
          Christopher T. Greco, P.C.
          Anthony R. Grossi
          601 Lexington Avenue
          New York, New York 10022
          Telephone: (212) 446-4800
          Facsimile: (212) 446-4900
          E-mail: joshua.sussberg@kirkland.com
                  christopher.greco@kirkland.com
                  anthony.grossi@kirkland.com

                 - and -

          James H.M. Sprayregen, P.C.
          John R. Luze
          300 North LaSalle Street
          Chicago, Illinois 60654
          Telephone: (312) 862-2000
          Facsimile: (312) 862-2200
          E-mail: james.sprayregen@kirkland.com
                  john.luze@kirkland.com

                        About McDermott

Headquartered in Houston, Texas, McDermott (NYSE: MDR) --
http://www.mcdermott.com/-- is a provider of engineering,
procurement, construction and installation and technology solutions
to the energy industry.  Its common stock was/is listed on the New
York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol MDR.

As of Sept. 30, 2019, McDermott had $8.75 billion in total assets,
$9.86 billion in total liabilities, $271 million in redeemable
preferred stock, and a total stockholders' deficit of $1.38
billion.

On Jan. 21, 2020, McDermott International announced that it has the
support of more than two-thirds of all its funded debt creditors
for a restructuring transaction that will equitize nearly all the
Company's funded debt, eliminating over $4.6 billion of debt.
McDermott solicited votes from its lenders and bondholders in
support of a prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization and
commenced the prepackaged Chapter 11 later in the day, on Jan. 21,
2020 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
Texas.

McDermott International and 224 affiliates on Jan. 21 and 22, 2020,
filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. Lead Case No.
20-303360).

The Hon. Marvin Isgur is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP (NEW YORK) as general
bankruptcy counsel; JACKSON WALKER L.L.P. as local counsel;
ALIXPARTNERS, LLP as restructuring advisor; AP SERVICES, LLC as
operational advisor; ARIAS, FABREGA & FABREGA as Panamanian
counsel; and BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. as corporate counsel.  PRIME CLERK
is the claims agent, maintaining the page
https://cases.primeclerk.com/mcdermott


MELBOURNE BEACH: Trustee's March 10 Auction of Melbourne Assets Set
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Karen S. Jennemann of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida authorized he bidding procedures of
Jules S. Cohen, the Chapter 11 trustee for Melbourne Beach, LLC, in
connection with the sale of the fully developed commercial shopping
center described generally as Ocean Springs Shopping Village,
951-991 E. Eau Gallie Blvd., Melbourne, Florida, to Terra Equity
Group, LLC for $15.5 million, subject to higher and better offers.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Jan. 22, 2020.

The Trustee will proceed with the sale of the Assets as provided in
the Order and the Bid and Sale Procedures.  The Bid and Sale
Procedures and the Notice of Sale are approved.  They will govern
all bids and bid proceedings relating to the Assets and the Sale.

Subject to final Court approval of a sale of the Assets pursuant to
the Bid and Sale Procedures, the Assets are anticipated to be sold
free and clear of any liens, claim, or encumbrances.

The Court approves the Stalking Horse Agreement to the extent
consistent with the Order.  It does not approve the Break-Up Fee
contained in the Stalking Horse Agreement and requested in the
Motion, but the Court will consider any application for a Break-Up
Fee by the Stalking Horse Bidder reflecting costs incurred by the
Stalking Horse Bidder in the event the Stalking Horse Bidder is not
the Successful Bidder.

No person or creditor will be permitted to credit bid on the Assets
in any manner or form.  No person or creditor will be permitted to
offset any sale price of the Assets by any claim asserted or filed
in the Bankruptcy Case.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Feb. 21, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

     b. Initial Bid: $15.8 million

     c. Deposit: 2.5% of the Initial Bid

     d. Auction: If at least one Qualified Bid by a Qualified
Bidder other than the Stalking Horse Bidder is received by the Bid
Deadline, Trustee will file a notice with the Court within 24 hours
after expiration of the Bid Deadline.  The Trustee may elect to
hold a live auction at a convenient time prior to 5:00 p.m. on
March 10, 2020.  If an auction is held, the Trustee will file a
notice with the Court of such election at least two business days
prior to the designated auction date and include any specific
auction procedures.

     e. Bid Increments: $100,000

     f. The Sale will be on an "as is, where is" basis and without
representations or warranties of any kind by Debtors, Trustee. or
Trustee's professionals.

     g. Sale Hearing: March 11, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. (ET)

Any Qualified Bidder will attach to such bidder's bid an affidavit
of any connection of the Qualified Bidder to (i) Debtor; (ii) any
creditor(s); (iii) any party in interest; (iv) any attorney who has
made an appearance in this Bankruptcy Case; (v) the United States
trustee; and (vi) any person employed by the United States trustee;
and (vii) Brian West, Westco, LLC, Pirogee Investment, LLC, Yellow
Funding, Corp., or any person connected with Mr. West, Pirogee
Investment, LLC, Yellow Funding, Corp., and stating that the
Qualified Bidder will not engage in any business relationship with
any such person(s) or their affiliates in the future.  The Trustee
will provide a list of all such person(s) in the Data Room.  The
only exception will be that any Qualified Bidder, if the Successful
Bidder, will not be precluded from entering into a lease with any
tenant at the Subject Property.

A copy of the Agreement and the Bidding Procedures is available at
https://tinyurl.com/wa7urbp from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                     About Melbourne Beach

Established in 1998, Melbourne Beach, LLC is a privately held
company that leases real properties.  It is the owner of Ocean
Spring Plaza located at 981 E. Eau, Gallie Boulevard, Melbourne,
Fla., valued by the company at $15.30 million.  Melbourne Beach's
gross revenue amounted to $997,732 in 2016 and $924,000 in 2015.

Melbourne Beach filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case
No. 17-07975) on Dec. 26, 2017.  In the petition signed by Brian
West, its managing member, the Debtor disclosed $15.35 million in
assets and $2.82 million in liabilities.

The Debtor tapped Latham, Luna, Eden & Beaudine, LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; Wald & Cohen, P.A. as accountant; and Marcus & Millichap
as real estate broker.

Jules Cohen was appointed as the Debtor's Chapter 11 trustee.  The
trustee is represented by Akerman LLP.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.

On Oct. 23, 2019, the Court appointed FL Retail Advisors, LLC as
real estate broker.


MELINTA THERAPEUTICS: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral on Final Basis
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware authorized Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. and
affiliates to use cash collateral during the period beginning on
the Petition Date and ending on April 30, 2020, solely for the
disbursements set forth in the Budget and the Final Order.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors were justly and lawfully
indebted and liable to the Prepetition Secured Parties -- Cortland
Capital Market Services, LLC, as administrative agent, and the
lenders party thereto -- in respect of outstanding loans in the
aggregate principal amount of not less than $133,308,885.

Cortland (for itself and for the benefit of the Prepetition
Lenders) is granted a valid, perfected, binding and continuing
security interest in and lien upon any and all tangible and
intangible prepetition and postpetition assets of the Debtors,
whether existing on the Petition Date or thereafter acquired,
whether tangible, intangible, real, personal or mixed, and the
proceeds, products, rents, and profits of the foregoing, whether
arising under section 552(b) of the Bankruptcy Code or otherwise,
of all the foregoing, excluding, however, the Debtors' claims and
causes of action under sections 502(d), 506(c), 544,

Cortland (for itself and for the benefit of the Prepetition
Lenders) is granted an allowed superpriority administrative expense
claim as provided for in section 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, for
and equal in amount to the aggregate diminution in the value of the
Prepetition Secured Parties' prepetition security interests in the
Prepetition Collateral from and after the Petition Date with
priority in payment over any and all administrative expenses of the
kind specified or ordered pursuant to any provision of the
Bankruptcy Code. Said Adequate Protection Superpriority Claims will
have recourse to and be payable from all of the Adequate Protection
Collateral, subject to the Carve-Out. The Adequate Protection
Superpriority Claims will be subject and subordinate only to the
Carve-Out and the Permitted Prior Liens.

A copy of the Final Order is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb19-12748-279.pdf

                  About Melinta Therapeutics

Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLNT) --
http://www.melinta.com/-- is the largest pure-play antibiotics
company, dedicated to saving lives threatened by the global public
health crisis of bacterial infections through the development and
commercialization of novel antibiotics that provide new therapeutic
solutions.  Its four marketed products include Baxdela
(delafloxacin), Vabomere (meropenem and vaborbactam), Orbactiv
(oritavancin), and Minocin (minocycline) for Injection.  This
portfolio provides Melinta with the unique ability to provide
providers and patients with a range of solutions that can meet the
tremendous need for novel antibiotics treating serious infections.

Melinta Therapeutics, Inc., and its subsidiaries sought Chapter 11
protection (D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-12748) on Dec. 27, 2019, after
reaching a deal with lenders on a Chapter 11 plan that would
convert debt to equity.

Melinta Therapeutics disclosed $228,491,000 in assets and
$289,022,000 in liabilities as of Sept. 30, 2019.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the presiding judge.

Melinta tapped Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP as
bankruptcy counsel.  Cole Scholtz LLP is co-counsel.  Jefferies,
LLC, is the investment banker; and Portage Point Partners, LLC, is
the financial advisor.  

Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is the claims agent, maintaining
the page http://www.kccllc.net/melinta   

The Supporting Lenders are advised by Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,
Houlihan Lokey and Landis Rath & Cobb LLP.


MR. CAMPER: March 11 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
-----------------------------------------------------
On Nov. 22, 2019, Debtor Mr. Camper, LLC, d/b/a Yogi Bear's
Jellystone Camp Resort, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Louisiana a Chapter 11 Disclosure Statement
and a Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.  On Jan. 23, 2020, Judge
Meredith S. Grabill ordered that:

  * March 11, 2020, at 3:00 P.M. in Courtroom B-709, Hale Boggs
Federal Building, 500 Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana is the
hearing to consider the approval of the Debtor's Chapter 11
Disclosure Statement.

  * March 4, 2020, is fixed as the last day for filing written
objections to said Disclosure Statement and for serving same in
accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 3017(a).

  * March 6, 2020, is the deadline to file exhibit and witness
lists into the record and the exhibits exchanged by the debtor and
any party opposing approval of the disclosure statement with a
courtesy copy to the Court.

A full-text copy of the order dated Jan. 23, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/u7w3jro from PacerMonitor at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

       Markus E. Gerdes
       P.O. Box 2862
       Hammond, LA 70404
       Tel: (985) 345-9404
       Fax: (985) 543-0434
       E-mail: markus@gerdeslaw.net

             - and -

       Ryan James Richmond
       Richmond Law Firm, LLC
       17732 Highland Road
       Suite G-228
       Baton Rouge, LA 70810
       Tel: (225) 572-2819
       Fax: (225) 286-3046
       E-mail: ryan@rjrichmondlaw.com

                     About Mr. Camper LLC

Mr. Camper, LLC -- https://www.jellystonela.com/ -- owns and
operates the Yogi Bear's Jellystone Camp Resort. The facility
features more than 450 wooded campsites, 75 cabins, swimming pools,
fishing ponds, game room, mini golf, canoe, kayak and paddle boat
rentals, RV storage, playground, wet "spray" ground, basketball
court, baseball field, laundry facilities, store, and propane
filling station.

Mr. Camper sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 19-11775) on July 1, 2019.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.  The case is assigned to Judge Elizabeth W. Magner. Richmond
Law Firm, LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


MW HORTICULTURE: Has Until April 29 to File Plan & Disclosures
--------------------------------------------------------------
On Jan. 22, 2020, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District
of Florida, Ft. Myers Division, conducted a status conference for
Debtor MW Horticulture Recycling Facility, Inc.  On Jan. 23, 2020,
Judge Caryl E. Delano ordered that:

  * The Debtor will file a Plan and Disclosure Statement on or
before April 29, 2020.

  * The hearing on the approval of the Disclosure Statement shall
be consolidated with the hearing on confirmation of the Plan.

A full-text copy of the order dated Jan. 23, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/ssp3nzh from PacerMonitor at no charge.

          About MW Horticulture Recycling Facility

MW Horticulture Recycling Facility, Inc., is a family-owned and
operated horticulture recycling waste management company with
locations in Lee County.

MW Horticulture Recycling Facility filed a voluntary Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-12193) on Dec. 31, 2019.  In
the petition signed by Mark D. Houghtaling, president, the Debtor
was estimated to have up to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities. Richard Johnston Jr., Esq., at Johnston
Law, PLLC, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


NEWARK SPECIAL: Bank Says Plan Not Feasible, Seeks Dismissal
------------------------------------------------------------
Secured creditor State Bank of India (California) objccts to the
Second Amended Plan filed by debtor Newark Special Technology Inc.,
a Delaware corporation, erroneously identified on its bankruptcy
petition as Newark Special Technologies, Inc.

According to the Bank of India, the Debtor cannot meet its burden
to prove that the Plan is feasible.  Nothing in Debtor's recent
financial performance (or financial performance during the nearly
18 months this case has been pending) suggests that Debtor will be
able to pay nearly $4,000 per month to its creditors while
maintaining its ongoing operations.

The Bank will not accept the Plan.  The Plan must pay the Bank a
market rate of interest on its claim. Similarly, Debtor must pay
the FTB's priority claim, but the Plan does not propose to pay the
FTB any interest, and for that reason is unconfirmable.

According to the Bank, in this case, the Debtor has had every
opportunity over the last 18 months to attempt to confirm a chapter
11 plan in this case.  The Court, the Bank asserts, should not
permit Debtor to remain in chapter 11 under the protection of the
automatic stay any longer when it is clear that there is no
reasonable prospect of a successful reorganization.  Conversion of
the case would serve no purpose because Debtor does not have any
unencumbered assets of any material value for a chapter 7 trustee
to administer. Dismissal is the only reasonable outcome.

The Bank requests that the Court dismiss this case.

A full-text copy of State Bank of India's comments dated January
21, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/rxr32ro from
PacerMonitor at no charge.        

State Bank of India is represented by:
Wayne R. Terry (SBN 134685)
Christopher D. Crowell (SBN 253103)
HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP
15910 Ventura Boulevard, 12th Floor
Encino, California 91436
Telephone: (818) 501 -3800
Facsimile: (818) 501-298 5
E-mail: wterry@hrhlaw.com
ccrowell@hrhlaw.com

             About Newark Special Technologies

Established in 1958, Newark Special Technologies, Inc., doing
business as Magorien Honing and Hydraulics, is in the business of
high precision I.D. contract honing. The Company has also
incorporated an in-house division for deep hole gun drilling,
trepanning and boring. The Company has recently merged with Modern
Hydraulic Technology to offer efficient and economical solutions
for building new hydraulic presses, modifying and repairing
presses, and complete overhauling of presses and cylinders.

Newark Special Technologies sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-18929) on Aug. 2,
2018. In the petition signed by Batuk Viradia, president, the
Debtor disclosed $125,800 in total assets and $1,023,154 in total
liabilities. Judge Neil W. Bason presides over the case.  Joseph L.
Pittera, Esq., at the Law Offices of Joseph L. Pittera, is the
Debtor's counsel.


NOFALIA INC: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Nofalia, Inc.
        8133 N. Mesa
        Suite 206
        Austin, TX 78759

Business Description: Nofalia, Inc. owns in fee simple three real
                      properties in Austin, TX, having a total
                      current value of $13.6 million.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 13, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Texas

Case No.: 20-10212

Judge: Hon. Tony M. Davis

Debtor's Counsel: Stephen W. Sather, Esq.
                  BARRON & NEWBURGER, P.C.
                  7320 N. Mopac Expwy., Suite 400
                  Austin, TX 78731
                  Tel: (512) 476-9103
                  E-mail: ssather@bn-lawyers.com

Total Assets: $13,600,550

Total Liabilities: $7,675,266

The petition was signed by Stephen Truesdell, authorized
representative.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                      https://is.gd/Qruwn1

List of Debtor's Three Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Jiffy Capital, LLC                  UCC Lien           $560,194
2376 60th Street
Brooklyn, NY 11204

2. Pedernales Electric Coop            Utilities            $3,984
P.O. Box 1
Johnson City, TX 78636

3. WTCPUA - Bee Cave South             Utilities            $1,224
13215 Bee Cave Pkwy.
Bldg. B, Ste. 110
Bee Cave, TX 78738


NORTIS INC: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to March 27
----------------------------------------------------------
Nortis, Inc. asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Washington to extend the exclusive period during which
the company can file a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization to March
27, and the period to solicit acceptances for the plan to May 25.

Nortis has been attempting to secure the services of a financial
advisor and investment banker, High Street Global Advisors -- a
process that has now involved two court hearings. In the meantime,
the company is working with HSGA to develop a business and
marketing plan and is regularly conferring with the unsecured
creditors' committee, Vertical Venture Partners, II, LP and other
constituencies regarding plan objectives and terms.

In addition, Nortis' management team has been steadfastly making
progress on additional NIH grant applications and its business
planning efforts to aid the reorganization process and strengthen
its operations, technological prowess and investment profile.

Nortis remains committed in continuing with these efforts and
negotiating a consensual Chapter 11 plan with other key parties in
interest, according to court filings.

                         About Nortis Inc.

Nortis, Inc., a company that provides scientific research and
development services, filed for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 19-13529) on Sept. 25,
2019 in Seattle, Wash.  In the petition signed by Thomas Neumann,
president and chief executive officer, the Debtor was estimated to
have between $1 million and $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.  The Hon. Christopher M. Alston is the presiding
judge.  Karr Tuttle Campbell is the Debtor's legal counsel.


NULIFE MULHOLLAND: Exclusivity Period Extended to May 22
--------------------------------------------------------
Nulife Mulholland, LLC asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California to extend the exclusivity periods to
file a Chapter 11 plan and solicit acceptances for the plan to May
22 and June 22, respectively.

Nulife needs more time to formulate a plan and provide evidentiary
support for the required feasibility analysis under the Bankruptcy
Code.

The deadline for filing claims expired on Jan. 6 and Nulife is
still in the process of assessing the claims. The amount of total
alleged secured claims is about $5 million, most of which is also
cross-collateralized against the company's real property, personal
property and accounts receivable.

                      About Nulife Mulholland

NuLife Mulholland LLC owns and operates an addiction treatment
center in California.  It owns in fee simple an 11.2-acre lot with
7400-square-foot house and 800-square-foot guest house located in
Calabasas, Calif., having an appraised value of $7 million. NuLife
Mulholland also owns in fee simple a two-acre lot with small
vineyard valued at $750,000.

NuLife Mulholland sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-12407) on Sept. 24,
2019. In the petition signed by its managing member, John D. Meints
Jr., the Debtor disclosed $8,028,177 in assets and $5,180,697 in
debt. Judge Martin R. Barash oversees the case. The Law Offices of
Robert M. Yaspan is the Debtor's legal counsel.

Dr. Timothy J. Stacy has been appointed as patient care ombudsman
for the company.  The PCO is represented by Resnik Hayes Moradi
LLP.


NUVECTRA CORP: Access to Cash Collateral Until Feb. 28 Okayed
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brenda T. Rhoades of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Texas authorized Nuvectra Corp. to use cash
collateral through the date which is the earliest to occur of (a)
Feb. 28, 2020 or (b) the date that is five business days following
a Termination Declaration Date.
Oxford Finance LLC, as collateral agent, is granted a valid and
perfected security interest in, and lien on all of the right, title
and interest of the Debtor in, to, and under all present and
after-acquired property and assets of the Debtor of any nature
whatsoever, whether real or personal, tangible or intangible,
wherever located, including, without limitation, all cash and cash
collateral of the Debtor (whether maintained with the Collateral
Agent, Silicon Valley Bank, or any other financial institution) and
any investment of such cash and cash collateral, goods,
cash-in-advance deposits, contracts, causes of action, general
intangibles, accounts receivable, and other rights to payment,
including equity interests in subsidiaries and all other investment
property, and the proceeds of all of the foregoing, whether now
existing or hereafter acquired

As further adequate protection against any diminution in value of
the interests of the Collateral Agent in the Prepetition
Collateral, the Collateral Agent is granted as and to the extent
provided by sections 503(b) and 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code
allowed superpriority administrative expense claims in the Chapter
11 Case in the amount of the Adequate Protection Obligations.

In addition, the Debtor will make all monthly interest payments to
the Collateral Agent in accordance with the Budget and the Loan
Documents. However, any interest payments made pursuant to the
Second Interim Order will be subject to claw-back by the estate if,
and solely to the extent that, (a) the Court enters a final order
or judgement, which is not subject to appeal, invalidating the
Loans or the Prepetition Liens based upon a timely filed Challenge,
and (b) the Court enters a final order or judgment, which is not
subject to appeal, directing the Collateral Agent to return such
Interest Payments to the estate.

A final hearing on the Cash Collateral Motion is scheduled for Feb.
28, 2020 at 10:30 a.m.

A copy of the Second Interim Order is available at PacerMonitor.com
at https://is.gd/m3Wi7B at no charge.

                  About Nuvectra Corporation

Nuvectra Corporation -- http://www.nuvectramed.com/-- operates as
a neurostimulation medical device company.  The Algovita Spinal
Cord Stimulation (SCS) System is the Company's first commercial
offering and is CE marked and FDA approved for the treatment of
chronic intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs.  The Company's
innovative technology platform also has capabilities under
development to support other indications such as sacral
neuromodulation (SNM) for the treatment of overactive bladder, and
deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of Parkinson's
Disease.

Nuvectra filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.
Tex. Case No. 19-43090) on Nov. 12, 2019.  In the petition signed
by CEO Fred B. Parks, the Debtor was estimated to have $10 million
to $50 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Hon. Brenda T.
Rhoades oversees the case.  The Debtor is represented by Ryan E.
Manns, Esq. and Toby L. Gerber, Esq. at Norton Rose Fulbright US
LLP.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Nov. 21, 2019, appointed
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors.  The committee is represented by Barnes & Thornburg LLP.


O'LINN SECURITY: Disclosure Statement Hearing Continued to March 10
-------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 21, 2020, Judge Scott C. Clarkson of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California, Riverside Division,
ordered that the hearing on the  Chapter 11 Disclosure Statement
filed by Debtor O’Linn Security Incorporated on January 15, 2020,
shall be continued from March 3, 2020, at 1:30 p.m., to March 10,
2020, at 1:30 p.m. in  Video Courtroom 126, 3420 Twelfth Street,
Riverside, CA 92501.

A copy of the order dated January 21, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/s9fzar3 from PacerMonitor at no charge.

                    About O'Linn Security

O'Linn Security Incorporated, a security firm that provides
services in the palm Springs area and greater Coachella Valley, in
California, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case
No.19-17085) on Aug. 13, 2019,  stimating both assets and
liabilities of less than $1 million. The case is assigned to Judge
Scott C. Clarkson. Steven R. Fox, Esq., and W. Sloan Youkstetter,
Esq., at The Fox Law Corporation, Inc., serve as the Debtor's
counsel.


OLDE LIBRARY: Exclusivity Period Extended to May 23
---------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
extended the exclusivity period for Olde Library Office Complex
Partnership to file a Chapter 11 plan to May 23 and the period to
solicit acceptances for the plan to July 22.

The extension will allow Olde Library to focus its efforts on the
sale of its real property, which will have a significant impact on
the liquidating plan for its business.  Olde Library is working
closely with its broker to bring about the sale of the real
property at a maximized price and needs additional time to present
the prevailing offer for the purchase of the property shortly.  

                     About Olde Library Office
                        Complex Partnership

Olde Library Office Complex Partnership sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No.
19-23767) on Sept. 26, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
was estimated to have assets of between $100,001 and $500,000 and
liabilities of the same range. Judge Gregory L. Taddonio oversees
the case.  

The Debtor is represented by Keila Estevez, Esq., at
Bernstein-Burkley, PC.  

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.


OLEGNA FUSCHI-AIBEL: Court Keeps Chapter 7 Conversion Order
-----------------------------------------------------------
Olegna Fuschi-Aibel filed an individual Chapter 11 petition on
January 18, 2018.  The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Connecticut released a modified timetable order on May 14, 2019,
requiring the Debtor to file a Disclosure Statement and an Amended
Chapter 11 Plan by June 4, 2019 and to obtain confirmation of a
Chapter 11 Plan by September 20, 2019.

On June 4, 2019, the Debtor filed a one-page document entitled
"Amended Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement."  The
debtor failed to file a Disclosure Statement and a complete Chapter
11 Plan, and failed to file a monthly operating report for April
2019.

The U.S. Trustee requested that the Court convert the Debtor's case
to a case under Chapter 7. On August 15, 2019, the Court entered an
order converting the Debtor's case to a case under Chapter 7.  

The Debtor filed a document entitled "Open Letter to the Court" on
August 29, 2019, seeking reconsideration of the Court's Conversion
Order.

In a Memorandum of Decision dated January 24, 2020 available at
https://is.gd/GuiwYE from Leagle.com, Chief Bankruptcy Judge Julie
A. Manning denied denies the Debtor's request.  The Conversion
Order remains in full effect.

Olegna Fuschi-Aibel, proceeding pro se, filed an individual Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 18-50052) on January 18,
2018. On August 15, 2019, the Court entered an order converting the
Debtor's case to a case under Chapter 7.



OMG MH HOLDINGS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: OMG MH Holdings, LLC
           DBA Massage Heights
           DBA MH River City, LLC
           DBA MH Town Center, LLC
           DBA University Park Retreat, LLC
           DBA MH Lake Pointe, LLC
           DBA MH Royal Oaks, LLC
           DBA MH Alden Bridge, LLC
           DBA Landings Spa Management, LLC
           DBA MH Bedford Grove, LLC
           DBA MH Bakery Square, LLC
        4866 Big Island Dr., Suite 2
        Jacksonville, FL 32246

Business Description: OMG MH Holdings, LLC is a Single Asset Real
                      Estate debtor (as defined in 11 U.S.C.
                      Section 101(51B)).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 12, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida

Case No.: 20-00478

Judge: Hon. Cynthia C. Jackson

Debtor's Counsel: Michael A. Steel, Esq.
                  BRENNAN, MANNA & DIAMOND
                  800 West Monroe St.
                  Jacksonville, FL 32202
                  Tel: (330) 374-7471
                  E-mail: masteel@bmdllc.com

Total Assets: $0

Total Liabilities: $4,291,161

The petition was signed by Eric Oliver, president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                         https://is.gd/w0Hrsd


PES HOLDINGS: Term Lender Group Files 2nd Modified Statement
------------------------------------------------------------
In the Chapter 11 cases of PES Holdings, LLC, et al., Ad Hoc Term
Loan Lender Group, through the law firms Morris, Nichols, Arsht &
Tunnell LLP and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP filed a second supplement
verified statement under Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure, to disclose an updated list of holdings of
the Ad Hoc Term Loan Group.

The Ad Hoc Term Loan Group formed by certain members that provided
first lien term loans under that certain First Lien Term Loan
Credit Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2018, by and among PES, the
Guarantors, as administrative agent and collateral agent, which
Members also committed to provide a superpriority, secured
debtor-in-possession credit facility pursuant to that certain
Superpriority Secured Debtor-In-Possession Credit Agreement, dated
as of July 24, 2019, by and among PES, each of the Guarantors party
thereto from time to time, the banks and other financial
institutions or entities party thereto from time to time and
Cortland, as administrative agent.

In June 2019, the Ad Hoc Term Loan Lender Group engaged Davis Polk
to represent it in connection with the Members' holdings of the
Existing Term Loan. In or around July 2019, the Ad Hoc Term Loan
Lender Group engaged MNAT to act as co-counsel in the Chapter 11
Cases.

Davis Polk and MNAT represents the Ad Hoc Term Loan Lender Group.
MNAT also separately represents Cortland as Prepetition Agent and
as the administrative agent under the DIP Credit Agreement, and
Davis Polk separately represents the Prepetition Agent as its
special litigation counsel, in each case, in the Chapter 11 Cases.
Counsel does not represent or purport to represent any other entity
or entities in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases. In addition,
the Ad Hoc Term Loan Lender Group does not claim or purport to
represent any other entity and undertakes no duties or obligations
to any entity.

On August 22, 2019, Counsel submitted the Verified Statement of
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2019 [D.I. 246].

On Dec. 10, 2019, Counsel submitted the First Supplemental Verified
Statement of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Morris, Nichols, Arsht &
Tunnell LLP Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2019
[D.I. 660]. Counsel submits this Second Supplemental Statement to
update information regarding the principal amount of claims under
the Tranche A Loans, Tranche A-2 Loans, Tranche B Loans, Tranche C
Loans, and DIP Loans that the Members of the Ad Hoc Term Loan
Lender Group beneficially own or manage in accordance with
Bankruptcy Rule 2019.

The Members of the Ad Hoc Term Loan Lender Group, collectively,
beneficially own or manage approximately $113,949,341.42 of Tranche
A Loans, $61,241,565.20 of Tranche A-2 Loans, $29,225,636.06 of
Tranche B Loans, $407,172,470.66 of Tranche C Loans, $65,000,000.00
of DIP Loans, $35,000,000.00 of Unfunded DIP Commitments, and
20,428,170 shares of PES Energy Inc., as set forth on Exhibit A
hereto.

As of Feb. 3, 2020, members of the Ad Hoc Term Loan Lender Group
and their disclosable economic interests are:

Credit Suisse Asset Management, LLC
11 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10010

* $53,823,545.32 in Tranche A Loans
* $26,443,431.57 in Tranche A-2 Loans
* $170,980,725.56 in Tranche C Loans
* $16,250,000.00 in DIP Loans
* $7,750,000.00 in Unfunded DIP Commitments
* 9,810,552 shares of PES Energy Inc.

Bardin Hill Investment Partners LP
477 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor
New York, New York 10022

* $11,031,274.52 in Tranche A Loans
* $26,443,431.57 in Tranche A-2 Loans
* $9,528,571.46 in Tranche B Loans
* $144,880,141.77 in Tranche C Loans
* $38,234,309.10 in DIP Loans
* $15,765,690.90 in Unfunded DIP Commitments
* 8,902,772 shares of PES Energy Inc.

Marble Ridge Capital LP
1250 Broadway, Suite 2601
New York, NY 10001

* $15,973,294.00 in Tranche A Loans
* $49,189,892.00 in Tranche C Loans
* $6,693,690.90 in DIP Loans

MJX Asset Management LLC
12 E 49th Street
New York, NY 10017

* $6,869,530.58 in Tranche A Loans
* $22,585,948.70 in Tranche C Loans
* $4,139,435.00 in Unfunded DIP Commitments
* 964,271.00 shares of PES Energy Inc.

Ellington Management Group
53 Forest Ave
Old Greenwich, CT 06870

* $15,251,697 in Tranche A Loans
* $10,615,605 in Tranche C Loans
* $3,731,342 in Unfunded DIP Commitments

Concise Capital Management, LP
1111 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1525
Miami, FL 33131

* $11,000,000 in Tranche A Loans
* $1,574,488 in Unfunded DIP Commitments

Serengeti Asset Management LP
632 Broadway
New York, New York 10012

* $3,204,847 in Tranche A-2 Loans
* $4,733,861 in Tranche B Loans
* $3,822,000 in DIP Loans
* 129,310 shares of PES Energy Inc.

J.H. Lane Partners, LP
126 East 56th Street, Suite 1620
New York, New York 10022

* $5,149,855.06 in Tranche A-2 Loans
* $6,106,060.60 in Tranche B Loans
* 215,517 shares of PES Energy Inc.

American Money Management
301 E. Fourth Street, 27th Floor
Cincinnati, OH 45202

* $8,920,157.63 in Tranche C Loans
* $2,039,044.10 in Unfunded DIP Commitments
* 405,748 shares of PES Energy Inc.

Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
1 Citizens Plaza
Providence, Rhode Island 02903

* $8,857,142.88 in Tranche B Loans

Counsel to the Ad Hoc Term Loan Lender Group can be reached at:

          MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
          Robert J. Dehney, Esq.
          Andrew R. Remming, Esq.
          Paige N. Topper, Esq.
          1201 North Market Street
          Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
          Telephone: (302) 351-9353
          Facsimile: (302) 425-4673
          E-mail: rdehney@mnat.com
                  aremming@mnat.com
                  ptopper@mnat.com

                  - and -

          DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
          Damian S. Schaible, Esq.
          James I. McClammy, Esq.
          David B. Toscano, Esq.
          Aryeh Ethan Falk, Esq.
          Jonah A. Peppiatt, Esq.
          450 Lexington Avenue
          New York, NY 10017
          Telephone: (212) 450-4000
          Facsimile: (212) 701-5800
          E-mail: damian.schaible@davispolk.com
                  james.mcclammy@davispolk.com
                  david.toscano@davispolk.com
                  aryeh.falk@davispolk.com
                  jonah.peppiatt@davispolk.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/xAWGnt and https://is.gd/0HFAou

                     About PES Holdings

Headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, PES Holdings LLC and
its subsidiaries are owners and operators of oil refining complex
and have been continuously operating in some form for over 150
years.

PES Energy Inc. is the indirect parent company of Philadelphia
Energy Solutions Refining and Marketing LLC (PESRM).  PESRM owns
and operates the Point Breeze and Girard Point oil refineries
located on an integrated, 1,300-acre refining complex in
Philadelphia.

PES Holdings, LLC, and seven subsidiaries, including PES Energy,
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
19-11626) on July 21, 2019.

PSE Holdings estimated $1 billion to $10 billion in assets and the
same range of liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as local bankruptcy
counsel; PJT Partners LP as financial advisor; and Alvarez & Marsal
North America, LLC, as restructuring advisor.  Omni Management
Group, Inc., is the notice and claims agent.

The Company's proposed DIP financing lenders are represented by
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc.


PICACHO HILLS UTILITY: Court Keeps Ruling on Bright View Claim
--------------------------------------------------------------
Picacho Hills Utility Company, Inc., and Bright View Land Company,
Inc. entered into a Water and Sewer Extension Agreement in 2003.
Under the agreement, Bright View agreed to construct and convey to
the Debtor certain water and sewer lines needed to extend utility
service to Bright View's "Coronado Ridge" subdivision in Picacho
Hills. Upon completion and conveyance of the water and sewer lines,
the Debtor agreed to reimburse Bright View for its "Line Extension
Costs" in equal annual payments over 40 years, without interest.

The agreement contained these terms:

     * In the event the Public Regulation Commission for the State
of New Mexico determines that the cost of the sewer and water lines
may not be included in PHUC's rate base, then in that event, PHUC
shall have no further obligation to make the payments due.

     * Bright View is obligated to pay the Debtor $345,060 for "the
cost of necessary improvements to the sewer plant to serve Coronado
Ridge subdivision only" (an "Impact Fee")

The Debtor did not file the Bright View agreement with the
Commission and did not notify the Commission of the proposed line
extension.

In October 2007, the Debtor petitioned the Commission to allow the
increase of the water and sewer rates it charged customers.  It
does not appear that the Debtor proposed that Bright View's Line
Extension Costs be added to the Debtor's rate base.

In August 2010, the Commission entered a final order adopting a
Final Recommended Decision on the Debtor's petition, with
modifications.  No determination was made about including Bright
View's line extension costs in the Debtor's rate base.  

The Rate Case involved a number of issues, including whether the
Debtor would have to deduct from its proposed rate base the Impact
Fees it had received from developers.  The Commission ruled that
such a deduction was required because the fees offset the Debtor's
construction expenses, meaning that there was no net expense that
would justify higher rates. The Commission did not rule, however,
whether the Debtor's obligation to reimburse developers for their
Line Extension Costs could be included in its rate base.

A hearing examiner from the Commission noted that the Debtor would
be relieved of the obligation to reimburse developers for Line
Extension Costs if the Commission determined that the costs could
not be included in the Debtor's rate base.  However, the examiner
did not determine whether Bright View's Line Extension Costs could
be included in the Debtor's rate base.

The Debtor appealed the final order to the New Mexico Supreme
Court. On September 7, 2011, the New Mexico Supreme Court affirmed
the Commission's final order.

When the Debtor filed for bankruptcy, Bright View filed a
$931,547.91 proof of claim on April 18, 2014, representing the
unpaid balance of Bright View's Line Extension Costs.  The Debtor
promptly objected to the claim, arguing that it had no obligation
to repay the Line Extension Costs because, by adopting the
Commission's Final Recommended Decision, the Commission had
determined that the costs could not be part of the rate base.
Bright View countered that the FRD contained no such determination.
From the time the Debtor objected to the Bright View claim until
the Court ruled, the parties focused solely on the FRD. Neither
party mentioned any other Commission order or ruling.

Because of the parties' reliance on the FRD, the Court ordered that
"[i]f the Court believes that the Objection could potentially be
ruled on based on the submitted papers, it will set a status
conference on short notice to the Debtor and Bright View to discuss
the matter."  The Court held such a status conference on August 4,
2014. At the conference both parties waived the right to a final,
evidentiary hearing.

The Court overruled the claim objection on August 20, 2014, holding
that the FRD did not determine whether Bright View's Line Extension
Costs could be included in the Debtor's rate base. Nine days later,
the Debtor filed the motion to reconsider, arguing that its counsel
had no authority to waive an evidentiary hearing.  The Debtor
submitted proposed additional evidence to the motion, all of which
relate to the Rate Case. Included in the proposed new evidence is
the Commission's 2008 final order.  The Debtor's proposed
additional evidence does not include a Commission determination
excluding Bright View's Line Extension Costs from Debtor's rate
base.

The Debtor also argued in the motion to reconsider that two
witnesses could testify about "the activities and proceedings
before and on behalf of the Public Regulation Commission. . . ."

The Court eventually converted the Debtor's case to chapter 7.  One
result of the Chapter 7 conversion is that the Debtor's motion to
reconsider languished for several years.  Now that the chapter 7
trustee is nearing completion of his case administration, the Court
needs to rule on the Debtor's motion.

Based on the claims register and the chapter 7 trustee's most
recent interim report, the Court notes the estate appears to be
insolvent regardless of the outcome of the claim objection. Thus,
the Debtor is "out of the money" and will not be affected by the
Court's ruling on the motion to reconsider.

In an opinion dated Jan. 24, 2020 available at https://is.gd/8dIUA0
from Leagle.com, Bankruptcy Judge David T. Thuma denied the
Debtor's motion to reconsider.  According to Judge Thuma, the
Debtor's counsel waived the right to an evidentiary hearing because
the Court had all the facts it needed (i.e. the FRD) to rule on the
claim objection.  The motion to reconsider callously tries to throw
the Debtor's counsel under the bus to get a second chance. The
attempt fails. The offered evidence submitted in support of the
motion to reconsider shows that counsel made the right decision,
not the wrong one, as the evidence adds nothing relevant to the
dispute. The court allowed the claim because of lack of merit after
carefully reading the findings of the careful FRD.

Picacho Hills Utility Company, Inc., Domestic Profit, Debtor, is
represented by A. Blair Dunn, Esq., at WARBA, LLP.

Robert Martin, Receiver, is represented by Paul M. Fish, Esq., and
Tommy O'Shea Gilstrap, Jr., Esq., at Gilstrap & Associates, P.C.

Clarke C. Coll, the Chapter 7 Trustee, is represented by Samuel I.
Roybal, Esq. -- sroybal@walkerlawpc.com -- and Thomas D. Walker,
Esq. -- twalker@walkerlawpc.com -- at Walker & Associates, P.C..
The Trustee is also represented by:

     Stephanie L. Schaeffer, Esq.
     McCarthy & Holthus, LLP
     6501 Eagle Rock NE, Suite A-3
     Albuquerque, NM 87113
     Tel: 505-219-4900

               About Picacho Hills Utility

Picacho Hills Utility Company, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D. N.M. Case No. 13-10742) on March 7, 2013.  The Debtor
was represented by William F. Davis & Associates, P.C.  The Debtor
estimated assets of at least $10 million and debts of at least $1
million.

At the time of filing, PHUC was a public utility as defined by the
New Mexico Public Utility Act, Sec. 62-3-3.G. and provided water
and sewer service to approximately 1,000 residences in Dona Ana
County, New Mexico.  PHUC was 100% owned by Stephen C. Blanco, its
president.

The Chapter 11 case was later converted to a Chapter 7
liquidation.



PINNACLE REGIONAL: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
----------------------------------------------------
Six affiliates that simultaneously filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

    Debtor                                           Case No.
    ------                                           --------
    Pinnacle Regional Hospital, Inc.                 20-20219
       FKA Blue Valley Hospital, Inc.
       FKA Blue Valley Healthcare System, Inc.
    12850 Metcalf Ave.
    Overland Park, KS 66213

    Pinnacle Regional Hospital, LLC                  20-20221
      DBA Cooper County Community Hospital, LLC
    17651 Hwy B
    Boonville, MO 65223
   
    Blue Valley Surgical Associates, LLC             20-20222
    12850 Metcalf Avenue
    Overland Park, KS 66213

    Pinnacle Healthcare System, Inc.                 20-20224
    12880 Metcalf Avenue
    Overland Park, KS 66213

    Joys' Majestic Paradise, Inc.                     20-20227
    14366 SW County Road 3988
    P.O. Box 144
    Hume, MO 64752
  
    Rojana Realty Investments, Inc.                   20-20225
    14717 Beverly Street
    Overland Park, KS 66223

Business Description: Pinnacle Regional Hospital and its debtor
                      subsidiaries are operators of general
                      acute-care hospitals in Overland Park, KS.
                      See http://pinnacleregional.com/

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 12, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Kansas

Debtors' Counsel: Jonathan A. Margolies, Esq.
                  MCDOWELL, RICE, SMITH & BUCHANAN, PC
                  605 W. 47th Street, Suite 350
                  Kansas City, MO 64112
                  Tel: (816) 753-5400
                  E-mail: jmargolies@mcdowellrice.com

Pinnacle Regional Hospital, Inc.'s
Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Pinnacle Regional Hospital, Inc.'s
Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

Pinnacle Regional Hospital, LLC's
Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Pinnacle Regional Hospital, LLC's
Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

Blue Valley Surgical's
Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Blue Valley Surgical's
Estimated Liabilities: $0 to $50,000

Pinnacle Healthcare's
Estimated Assets: Unknown

Pinnacle Healthcare's
Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

Rojana Realty Investments'
Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Rojana Realty Investments'
Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

Joys' Majestic Paradise's
Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Joys' Majestic Paradise's
Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petitions were signed by Douglas Palzer, director.

The Debtors failed to include in the petitions lists of their 20
largest unsecured creditors at the time of the filing.

Full-text copies of the petitions are available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                     https://is.gd/YsnPPW
                     https://is.gd/P3JKoc
                     https://is.gd/FEIIxa
                     https://is.gd/5Cy4zi
                     https://is.gd/3boJfP
                     https://is.gd/xs2q8P


PUERTO RICAN PARADE: Feb. 27 Plan & Disclosure Hearing Set
----------------------------------------------------------
On Jan. 22, 2020, debtor Puerto Rican Parade Committee of Chicago,
Inc. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District
of Illinois, Eastern Division, a Second Amended Plan of
Reorganization and a Second Amended Disclosure Statement.  On Jan.
23, 2020, Judge Carol A. Doyle ordered that:

  * Feb. 27, 2020, at 10:30 a.m., in Room 742 of the United States
Courthouse, 219 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois is the
hearing to consider approval of the Disclosure Statement. If at the
conclusion of the said hearing the Disclosure Statement is approved
by the court, the Court will immediately hold a hearing to consider
confirmation of the Plan.

  * Feb. 20, 2020, is fixed as the last day for creditors entitled
to vote upon the Plan by written ballot, written acceptances or
rejections of the plan.

  * Feb. 20, 2020, is the last day for filing any objection to the
approval of the Disclosure Statement or objection to the
confirmation of the Plan.

  * Feb. 25, 2020, is the deadline for counsel for Debtor to file a
ballot report with regard to the Plan.

A full-text copy of the order dated Jan. 23, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/wjbeaow from PacerMonitor at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

         Paul M. Bach
         Penelope N. Bach
         BACH LAW OFFICES
         P.O. Box 1285
         Northbrook, IL 60065
         Tel: (847) 564-0808

              About Puerto Rican Parade Committee

Puerto Rican Parade Committee of Chicago, Inc., sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No.
17-03480) on Feb. 6, 2017.  In the petition signed by Angel Medina,
president, the Debtor was estimated to have assets of less than $1
million.  The case is assigned to Judge Carol A. Doyle.  Paul M.
Bach, Esq., and Penelope N. Bach, Esq., at the Bach Law Offices,
serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


PYXUS INTERNATIONAL: Incurs $22.4-Mil. Net Loss in Third Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------------
Pyxus International, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $22.45 million on $363.3 million of sales and other operating
revenues for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2019, compared to a
net loss of $5 million on $524.5 million of sales and other
operating revenues for the same period in 2018.

For the nine months ended Dec. 31, 2019, the Company reported a net
loss of $101.2 million on $1.02 billion of sales and other
operating revenues compared to a net loss of $61.25 million on
$1.21 billion of sales and other operating revenues for the nine
months ended Dec. 31, 2018.

As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had $1.95 billion in total assets,
$1.85 billion in total liabilities, and $92.03 million in total
stockholders' equity.

Pieter Sikkel, chairman, president and CEO said, "Two years into
our One Tomorrow initiative, we have made significant operational
progress against our strategy to transform the business and become
a purpose-led company.  With products spanning more than five
different categories, Pyxus is well on its path to becoming a
diversified agricultural technology and consumer products goods
company.  Across all of our business segments, we strongly believe
that our commitment to transparency, sustainability, quality and
growth based on market demand will position us as a stronger
company prepared to meet the requirements of the international
market.

"As we look toward our capital structure, we continue to evaluate
and develop the plans for a potential partial monetization of
interests in subsidiaries in the Other Products and Services
segment and to address the Company's long-term debt, maturing in
calendar 2021.  Our target is to achieve run rate positive Adjusted
EBITDA across our Global Specialty Products division during fiscal
2021.

"Our leaf business continues to focus on enhancing efficiency and
growing market share.  Although volumes were down compared to the
same quarter in 2019, these results were largely driven by timing
in shipments and a delay in processing in Africa.  We are
encouraged by signed agreements with key customers in Argentina and
Tanzania, which further position us as strategic partners on a
global basis.  Additionally, we remain focused on uncommitted
inventory that is near the upper end of our stated range of $50
million to $150 million.

"The North American region continues to be impacted by trade
disputes.  While we are pleased that tobacco is included on the
list of agricultural products in Phase 1 of the U.S.-China trade
agreement, additional steps are needed to restart leaf exports from
the United States to China.  We are also closely monitoring
developments with respect to the coronavirus.  While our fourth
fiscal quarter has historically been the strongest revenue quarter
of the fiscal year, and we anticipate it to be so again this fiscal
year, due to these and other uncertainties that may impact results
for the fourth quarter, we are not in a position to update our
previously issued guidance for the current fiscal year and are
withdrawing that guidance, both with respect to revenues and
adjusted EBITDA.

"Figr Brands, Inc., our wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, furthered
its strategic growth in terms of capacity expansion, product
innovation and geographic expansion during the quarter as the
cannabis market responds to a slower than expected roll-out of
retail availability in Canada.  However, we are pleased that the
market continued to grow.  Latest estimates from Health Canada show
the legal cannabis market grew to approximately CA$135.75 million
in November 2019, bringing it to an annual run rate of over CA$1.6
billion one year into legalization.

"Figr has continued to maintain strong market share in the
provinces in which it operates.  While Figr's market share has been
impacted by price compression in the market due to its position as
a premium brand, it plans to maintain price discipline and growth
rate by shifting product mix to higher margin products through
innovation.  Figr launched in the Ontario market on December 5 with
flowers, oil and pre-rolls and released its THC vape products on
January 17.  We look forward to Figr's THC vape devices becoming
available in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, subject to local rules
and regulations.

"Figr's entrance into the Ontario market marked a major milestone
in the company's execution of its cross-country expansion strategy,
with a goal of marketing products across all of Canada by the end
of the first quarter of fiscal 2021.  This expansion is supported
by the growth of Figr's operational footprint.  Figr is currently
operating approximately 250,000 square feet in Prince Edward Island
(PEI) and Ontario with a potential capacity of up to 30,000
kilograms per year.  Following the completion of its PEI facility
expansion and approvals from Health Canada, Figr will operate
approximately 350,000 square feet across both locations with
potential capacity of up to approximately 45,000 kilograms per
year.

"We are continuing to build a portfolio of CBD brands, each of
which is being developed to meet the unique needs of distinct
consumer segments.  In December, our Criticality joint venture
released its first set of Korent combination packs and we were
pleased that the Korent cooling liniment received the 2020 "best
topical" award from Hemp Business Magazine on January 30.  Humble
Juice Co. is also developing its own CBD line, which we expect to
roll out to the market in the first half of fiscal 2021.
Additionally, following the receipt of its industrial hemp license
from Health Canada, Figr successfully contracted and harvested
industrial hemp and has begun extracting cannabinoid oil from the
crop.

"Criticality continues to expand its extraction capacity to meet
growing consumer demand for quality, traceable CBD products.  By
the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2021, Criticality expects to
complete its current expansion project and triple its extraction
capability.  Criticality also expects to receive GMP, Kosher and
Organic certifications by the end of the fiscal year - essential
components of our commitment to quality products and international
expansion efforts.  Through our Pyxus Agriculture USA affiliate, we
have purchased approximately 760,000 pounds of industrial hemp this
fiscal year.

"We believe Pyxus is well-positioned in the evolving nicotine
e-liquid regulatory environment as we have been anticipating and
planning for since the establishment of our first e-liquid joint
venture in 2014.  Following the September 2019 vaping illness
crisis, which we suspect is due to black market products, the
industry was impacted by fast-moving misinformation about the
illnesses, government restriction on access to products, and
general consumer confusion.  The FDA guidance released in January
was a positive step forward in addressing these issues and we hope
future regulation will strengthen consumer confidence in the
category.  In fact, following an initial drop in sales in September
2019, internal projections for Purilum, Humble and Bantam are
anticipated to grow following the filing and acceptance of May 2020
Premarket Tobacco Product Application (PMTA) application
submissions.  As the industry evolves, we will continue to hold
ourselves to a higher standard and accountable to our marketing
commitment that includes specific measures to help ensure we are
marketing to legal-age consumers.

"Our Value-Added Agricultural Products division is continuing to
advance both its sunflower and groundnut initiatives, and our Pyxus
Agriculture Tanzania subsidiary is proceeding with plans to bring a
consumer product to market in fiscal 2021.

"Since the launch of our One Tomorrow strategy two years ago, we
have benefited from the progress of our diversification strategy,
innovation efforts and global presence.  As we execute against our
plan, we are committed to building a stronger Pyxus for our
shareholders, as well as our employees, our contracted farmers and
the communities in which we operate."

                 Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company's liquidity requirements are affected by various
factors including crop seasonality, foreign currency and interest
rates, green tobacco prices, customer mix, crop size and quality,
branding, marketing, and advertising to support the new business
lines, increased legal and professional costs associated with
developing plans for a potential partial monetization of interests
in certain subsidiaries, and the extent and timing of facility
expansions.  As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company's available credit
lines and cash totaled $396.4 million.  The Company will continue
to monitor and, as available, adjust funding sources as needed to
enhance and drive various business opportunities that maintain
flexibility and meet cost expectations.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at the
SEC's website at:

                        https://is.gd/oiVD9u

                  About Pyxus International

Pyxus International Inc. (NYSE: PYX) -- http://www.pyxus.com/-- is
a global agricultural company that provides agricultural products,
ingredients and services to businesses and customers. Headquartered
in the Research Triangle Park region of North Carolina, the Company
contracts with growers across five continents to help them produce
sustainable, compliant crops.


                           *   *   *

As reported by the TCR on Jan. 29, 2020, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded Pyxus International, Inc's Corporate Family Rating to
Caa2 from Caa1.  The downgrade reflects the company's weakening
liquidity and continued delay in monetizing a portion of its FIGR
business (cannabis), proceeds of which were expected to repay
debt.

In December 2019, S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit
rating on U.S.-based global agricultural technology company Pyxus
International Inc. to 'CCC' from 'CCC+'.


R-BOC REPRESENTATIVES: Feb. 20 Plan & Disclosure Hearing Set
------------------------------------------------------------
On January 22, 2020, debtor R-BOC Representatives, Inc., filed with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
Eastern Division, a Second Amended Plan of Reorganization.  On Jan.
23, 2020, Judge Deborah L. Thorne ordered that:

  * Feb. 18, 2020, is the deadline for all votes to accept or
reject the Plan.

  * Feb. 18, 2020, is the deadline to file objections to
confirmation of the Plan and adequacy of the Disclosure Statement.

  * Feb. 18, 2020, is the deadline for the Debtor's attorney to
file a report of ballots.

  * Feb. 20, 2020, at the United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern
Division, 219 Dearborn, Chicago, IL 60604 at 11:00 a.m., Courtroom
613 is the combined hearing on the adequacy of the Disclosure
Statement and confirmation of the Debtor's Second Amended Plan.

A full-text copy of the order dated Jan. 23, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/urnztpm from PacerMonitor at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

       Richard G. Larsen
       SPRINGER LARSEN GREENE, LLC
       d/b/a Springer Brown
       Wheaton Office Center
       300 S. County Farm Road, Ste. G
       Tel: (630) 510-0000
       E-mail: rlarsen@springerbrown.com

                 About R-BOC Representatives

R-BOC Representatives, Inc., is an Illinois corporation with its
principal place of business in Saint Charles, Illinois. Established
in June 2003, R-BOC Representatives manufactures plastic,
reverse-threaded couplers, micro-couplers, and Push-2-Connect
couplers for the telecommunications market serving the Ohio,
Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Minnesota areas.

R-BOC Representatives, Inc., based in Saint Charles, IL, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 17-28555) on Sept.
25, 2017. In the petition signed by Carolyn Lundeen, president, the
Debtor was estimated to have $500,000 to $1 million in assets and
$10 million to $50 million in liabilities.  The Hon. Deborah L.
Thorne oversees the case.  Richard G. Larsen, Esq., at Springer
Brown, LLC, serves as bankruptcy counsel.


RESTLAND MEMORIAL: To Seek Plan Confirmation March 19
-----------------------------------------------------
Judge Gregory L. Taddonio has ordered that the Disclosure Statement
explaining the Chapter 11 Plan filed by Restland Memorial Parks,
Inc., is conditionally APPROVED.

On March 19, 2020, at 09:30 a.m. the Court will hold a hearing to
consider approval of the Disclosure Statement and confirmation of
the Plan in Courtroom A, 54th Floor, U.S. Steel Tower, 600 Grant
Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15219.

All ballots accepting or rejecting the Plan, and objections to
approval of the Plan and the Disclosure Statement are due March 9,
2020.

Counsel for the Debtor will file a summary of the balloting reuslts
no later than 7 days before the Plan confirmation hearing.

                 About Restland Memorial Parks

Restland Memorial Parks, Inc., offers cemetery pre-need programs.

Restland Memorial Parks sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 18-24151) on Oct. 24,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of less than $1
million.   The Debtor tapped Donald R. Calaiaro, Esq., at  Calaiaro
Valencik as its legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case.


RICKY TUCKER: Pecan Hill Buying Enigma Property for $475K
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge John T. Laney, III of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Georgia granted expedited hearing on Ricky Clay
Tucker's sale of the 58.94 acres located on Whitley Tucker Road,
Enigma, Georgia, together will equipment and fixtures located
thereon and used in connection with poultry production, to Pecan
Hill Land & Cattle, LLC, for $475,000.

An expedited hearing on the Motion will be held on Feb. 10, 2020 at
2:00 p.m.

The Debtors will immediately serve a copy of the Order via U.S.
Mail and via email (if possible) upon (i) the Office of the United
States Trustee; (ii) Respondent to the Motion and its counsel;
(iii) the 20 largest unsecured creditors, and (iv) all parties who
have filed and served on the Debtors' requests for service of
notices in these cases.   

Ricky Wayne Tucker and Ricky Clay Tucker sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 18-70448) on April 19, 2018.
The Debtor tapped Christopher W. Terry, Esq., at Stone and Baxter,
LLP, as counsel.


RIOT BLOCKCHAIN: Extends CEO McGonegal's Contract by One Year
-------------------------------------------------------------
Riot Blockchain, Inc. and its Chief Executive Officer and acting
Chief Financial Officer, Jeffrey G. McGonegal entered into an
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, effective as
of Feb. 7, 2020, pursuant to which the Executive agreed to continue
to serve as the Company's chief executive officer through Feb. 7,
2021.  The Executive will also continue to serve as the Company's
acting chief financial officer.  The Amended and Restated McGonegal
Employment Agreement amends and restates in its entirety the former
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Executive and the
Company dated as of Feb. 5, 2019.

According to the terms of the Amended and Restated McGonegal
Employment Agreement, the Executive will receive a prorated annual
salary of $300,000, as well as 209,790 restricted stock units,
convertible on a one-for-one basis into shares of the Company's
Common Stock.  The RSUs granted pursuant to the Amended and
Restated McGonegal Employment Agreement are subject to the terms
and conditions of the Riot Blockchain, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive
Plan and vest in four equal quarterly installments, with each
quarterly installment vesting as of the end of each quarter during
the term of the Amended and Restated McGonegal Employment
Agreement.  The Company will settle vested RSUs in accordance with
the terms of the Amended and Restated McGonegal Employment
Agreement and the Plan.

                      About Riot Blockchain

Headquartered in Castle Rock, Colorado, Riot Blockchain --
http://www.RiotBlockchain.com/-- is focused on building,
operating, and supporting blockchain technologies.  Its primary
operations consist of cryptocurrency mining, targeted development
of a cryptocurrency exchange, and the identification and support of
innovations within the sector.

Riot Blockchain reported a net loss of $60.21 million in 2018
following a net loss of $19.97 million in 2017.  As of Sept. 30,
2019, the Company had $32.98 million in total assets, $4.79 million
in total liabilities, and $28.19 million in total stockholders'
equity.

Marcum LLP, in New York, the Company's auditor since 2018, issued a
"going concern" qualification in its report dated April 2, 2019, on
the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has a significant working
capital deficiency, has incurred significant losses, and needs to
raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its
operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


ROBUST LLC: US Trustee Has Limited Objection to Disc. Statement
---------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel J. Casamatta, Acting United States Trustee for the Eastern
District of Missouri objects on a limited basis to the Disclosure
Statement filed by Robust, LLC.

The United States Trustee points out that the Debtor is delinquent
in filing its Monthly Operating Reports since the inception of the
case (July 2019 through December 2019; the January 2020 will be due
February 15, 2020).

                       About Robust LLC

Robust, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. E.D.
Mo. Case No. 19-44377) on July 15, 2019, estimating under $1
million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is represented
by Spencer P. Desai, Esq., at Carmody MacDonald.


ROCKPOINT GAS: Fitch Alters Outlook on 'B-' LT IDR to Stable
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Rockpoint Gas Storage Partners LP's
Long-Term Issuer Default Rating at 'B-'. Furthermore, Fitch has
affirmed Rockpoint Gas Storage Canada Ltd.'s IDR at 'B-' and the
2023 Senior Secured Notes at 'B'/'RR3'. Additionally, the Outlook
has been revised to Stable from Positive for both entities.

The ratings reflect ROCGAS's small size (as measured by EBITDA),
the company's activity in the volatile midstream sub-segment of
natural gas storage (including the use of matched-booked
proprietary storage positions), and its geographical concentration
in the province of Alberta (roughly 50% total capacity). These
factors are offset by leverage that is strong for the rating
category (total debt to adjusted EBITDA forecast to decline from
5.5x in fiscal year ending MArch 31, 2021 to 4.8x in fiscal 2023)
as well as solid sponsor support.

The Stable Outlook is based on performance versus Fitch
sensitivities over the past twelve months. Due to a continued
customer hesitancy towards signing multi-year storage contracts
with ROCGAS, the percentage of working gas capacity tied to
contracts with terms of 3 years or greater has under-run Fitch
expectations. Additionally, a higher debt balance versus the prior
Fitch forecast and reported results for the fiscal year-to-date
trending below target make it unlikely that fiscal 2020 total debt
to adjusted EBITDA will meet the prior Fitch estimate. ROCGAS
executed very well with its optimization strategy in fiscal 2019,
offsetting lower than expected firm and short-term storage contract
capacity utilization and surpassing Fitch EBITDA expectations and
leverage targets. Fitch believes the opportunity for a similar
scenario to develop in fiscal 2020 is present, should volatility in
AECO natural gas prices over the balance of the winter months
materialize.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Evolving AECO Dynamics: Natural gas storage values in Alberta as
well as physical access to natural gas storage facilities have been
impacted by expansion work on the Nova Gas Transmission Ltd. (NGTL,
owned and operated by TC Energy Corp.) system since 2017.
Curtailments during construction have limited the ability to inject
gas into storage during certain periods. The resulting uncertainty
has caused reluctance among ROCGAS' customers to sign term
contracts for storage. The Canadian Energy Regulator approved a
temporary service protocol on the NGTL system in the fall of 2019,
which has allowed and will allow access to storage during certain
months and should reduce uncertainty in the AECO market. Fitch
views the ultimate conclusion of the NGTL system expansions
(currently 2021-2023) as supportive for ROCGAS, if the result were
to be a return to a business mix, including a higher percentage of
revenue coming from multi-year contracts, more in line with other
storage operators in Fitch's North American midstream coverage.

Distinct Time-Spread Storylines: Time-spreads, measured by the
difference in winter and summer natural gas prices, continue to be
one of the main external drivers of expectations for ROCGAS over
the forecast period, in Fitch's view. These spreads are driven by
regional market and non-market factors. ROCGAS operates in
distinctly different regions of North America, the most important
of which are the AECO Hub in Southern Alberta and PG&E Citygate in
Northern California. Strong time-spreads, relative to recent years,
were recorded at AECO for much of calendar 2019 but those spreads
compressed following the implementation of the above mentioned TSP.
In California, storage values, as indicated by time-spreads, for
the 2019/2020 winter were relatively weak over calendar 2019 but
are meaningfully higher for the 2020/2021 winter, driven by the
Pacific Gas & Electric Company's resolution of certain gas
storage-related matters. ROCGAS is impacted by these time-spreads
when re-contracting existing storage space and when filling
uncontracted capacity with proprietary gas for its own account
(which is immediately sold forward to lock in margin). Without the
existence of a high percentage of storage contracts with terms of
three years or more, the ROCGAS credit profile will remain
sensitive to where natural gas time-spreads are and are expected to
be.

Adapting to Market Conditions: ROCGAS has set targets for the
allocation of capacity to longer-term firm storage service
contracts, short-term storage service contracts, and matched-booked
proprietary storage positions (optimization). The targeted
allocation includes a higher percentage of FSS and STS contracts
than currently exists. The trend of lower natural gas storage
values across North America witnessed over the past few years,
versus longer dated history, has incited ROCGAS to sign shorter
contract tenures and increased capacity used for optimization, as
well as reduced overall utilization. Generally, Fitch views
management's ability to both successfully re-contract where
appropriate and replace lost contracted dollars with optimization
revenue as central to the internally-driven aspect of the ROCGAS
story. More specifically, contract lengths at or beyond three years
in Alberta and/or California, as well as higher overall utilization
rates, would be viewed by Fitch as supportive of credit quality.

LNG, Smooth Sailing Thus Far: The expansion of LNG facilities in
North America and the ultimate end use of the exported LNG are
important factors to ROCGAS. The company has facilities in
proximity to LNG production and/or operates within a market which
benefits from having an LNG facility as an added outlet for natural
gas production. At present, U.S. LNG plants are showing baseload
operations, not exerting negative pressure on time-spreads and are
currently supportive of the storage sector. Fitch notes recent
start-ups at Freeport LNG and Elba Island as further data points in
the North American LNG narrative. ROCGAS, however, competes against
more diversified and larger companies that operate storage
businesses and is more leveraged than most of these peers. ROCGAS
is more exposed than the average storage operator with respect to
an evolution of LNG exports that is adverse to the storage sector.

Sponsor Support: Brookfield Asset Management Inc. controls ROCGAS.
BAM invests in multiple real asset classes, with over $500 billion
of assets under management worldwide. BAM has demonstrated a
patient approach to developing and capitalizing slowly emerging
trends. BAM has also caused ownership to be supportive, with
approximately $400 million of third-party senior debt bought out by
ROCGAS' owner, and converted to PIK subordinated debt.

Rating Linkage: The subsidiary RGSCAN is stronger than parent
ROCGAS, as RGSCAN is closer to the biggest block of operating
assets, the Alberta storage properties. The package of guarantees
equalizes the ratings. The package breaks down as follows. Each of
RGSCAN, ROCGAS and certain of their subsidiaries (where certain
operating assets are held) guarantee either or both the Notes and
the asset-based revolving credit facility. Additionally, the ABL
and the Notes are guaranteed by Lodi Gas Storage, LLC, the
Brookfield subsidiary that controls the Lodi operating assets. This
entity is an affiliate of ROCGAS, yet is not a subsidiary of
ROCGAS. The package of guarantees that existed at the closing of
the Notes issuance was increased to include the California assets
(Lodi and Wild Goose) in October 2018 after approval by the
California Public Utility Commission. For completeness, Fitch notes
that BIF II Tres Palacios Aggregator (Delaware) LLC, a Brookfield
entity that holds the joint venture stake in the Tres Palacios
operating assets, is also a guarantor; this entity is an affiliate
of ROCGAS, yet is not a subsidiary of ROCGAS.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

ROCGAS is somewhat unique in Fitch's rated midstream universe in
that it is the only pure play natural gas storage business. The
most direct peer comparison available is Zenith Energy U.S.
Logistics Holdings, LLC (B-/Stable), which is a small storage
company focused on crude oil. ROCGAS generates more annual EBITDA
than Zenith and ROCGAS' current and expected leverage is lower
relative to Zenith's. Reported FY19 total debt to adjusted EBITDA
was a strong 3.6x, with a leverage range of 4.8x to 5.8x expected
over the forecast period. This compares to year end 2020 leverage
expectations for Zenith in the 6.5x to 7.0x range. However, Zenith
has lower business risk (no optimization) and has a longer termed
contract portfolio (better revenue assurance). Fitch view's the
overall credit profiles of ROCGAS and Zenith as comparable, leading
to the IDRs of both companies set at the same level.

TransMontaigne Partners LLC. (BB/Stable) is a terminaling company
operating in 20 U.S. states. Like Zenith, TransMontaigne is focused
on crude oil and related products (versus gas storage at ROCGAS)
however TransMontaige has a meaningfully higher 95% of revenue
coming from fee-based contracts (roughly 40% of which have a term
remaining of three or more years). TransMontaigne has EBITDA that
is slightly larger than ROCGAS. TransMontaigne's projected leverage
is in the 4.8x to 5.0x area.

Amerigas Partners, L.P. (BB/Stable) is a retail business, whereas
ROCGAS, like most midstream companies, operates at the wholesale
level of the commercial chain. A similarity to ROCGAS is that
Amerigas's business does have a strong seasonal component to it and
is heavily influenced by the weather in its peak season. Amerigas
is much bigger than ROCGAS and its leverage is projected to be in
the 4.2x to 4.5x range.

Boardwalk Pipelines, L.P. (BBB-/Stable) is a large and diversified
entity that serves utility customers like ROCGAS does. While
Boardwalk owns and operates 9 salt-dome NGL storage caverns and 14
underground natural gas storage facilities with an aggregate
capacity of 208 Bcf, its bigger natural gas-related activity is
interstate natural gas pipelines, where fundamentals are better
than in the natural gas storage business.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  - Optimization revenue and new contract revenue both reflect on a
near-term basis time-spreads that have prevailed in the recent
past, with some moderate improvement after the fiscal year ending
March 31, 2020;

  - The absolute level of Alberta prices, which is a driver of
asset-based credit facility usage, reflects a continued large
discount to NYMEX Henry Hub prices in the medium-term. In turn, the
Henry Hub prices reflect the Fitch price deck, e.g., $2.00/MMBtu to
$2.25/MMBtu in calendar years 2020-2021;

  - Performance under existing contracts with third-parties
produces the cash flows management forecasts;

  - Capex consistent with management forecasts of approximately $9
million to $16 million per year (minimal growth spending);

  - Brookfield Asset Management Inc. continues to cause its
subsidiary to provide a $100 million unsecured revolving credit
facility for ROCGAS's liquidity;

  - All BAM-held (or BAM-affiliate-held) debt at ROCGAS or RGSCAN
remains subordinated;

  - No or minimal return of capital to sponsor, including repayment
of sponsor-provided subordinated debt.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  - An increase in the percentage of working gas capacity tied to
contracts with three years or more left and total debt to adjusted
EBITDA is expected to be 5.5x or less on a sustained basis.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  - Expected or actual fiscal year with total debt to adjusted
EBITDA above 7.5x and/or adjusted EBITDA interest coverage below
1.5x;

  - A future decrease in the percentage of working gas capacity
tied to multi-year contracts;

  - Change in the way the company structures new debt issuances
(such as without full guarantees, or debt at affiliates);

  - Change in terms regarding Brookfield debt instruments that are
averse to third-party senior creditors.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Adequate Liquidity: ROCGAS has adequate liquidity stemming from a
September 30, 2019 cash balance of just over $7 million. The
company has availability under its secured revolving credit
facilities of $73 million and an unutilized $100 million unsecured
revolver with Brookfield (Brookfield Revolver). Collectively, the
company has $175 million of available liquidity as of November 13,
2019.

The company has the option to defer or pay interest in kind on its
$100 million unsecured revolving credit facility (as well as
certain promissory notes held by BAM). Additionally, the company's
earliest debt maturity occurs in December 2021 (which is the
expiration date of its senior secured asset-based credit facility).
The company issued $400 million in senior secured notes in February
2018 that are not due until March 2023. Lastly, the company has
$400 million in outstanding subordinated unsecured promissory notes
(called the Swan Notes) which were accounted for at Brookfield's
transacted cost of $0 and bear no interest.

The company utilizes its credit facilities largely to purchase
natural gas inventory in the summer months to be sold at higher
prices in the winter months. Given that ROCGAS hedges those open
positions immediately with future/forward contracts this strategy
of using short-term debt instruments appears appropriate.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

Fitch's leverage metrics are based on financial data contained in
Rockpoint Gas Storage Partners LP's audited combined consolidated
financial statements. These statements perform a combination of (a)
the consolidated results of Rockpoint Gas Storage Partners LP with
(b) affiliate entities that are not Rockpoint subsidiaries nor
Rockpoint investees. The key affiliate entities so combined are
Lodi Gas Storage, LLC and BIF II Tres Palacios Aggregator
(Delaware) LLC.

Fitch has applied 100% equity credit to subordinated indebtedness
provided by ROCGAS's sponsor, BAM.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of 3 - ESG issues are credit
neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either
due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by
the entity.

ROCGAS has an ESG Relevance Score of 4 for Group Structure and
Financial Transparency as private-equity backed midstream entities
typically have less structural and financial disclosure
transparency than publicly traded issuers. This has a negative
impact on the credit profile, and is relevant to the rating in
conjunction with other factors. Also, group structure
considerations have elevated scope for ROCGAS given the
inter-family/related party transactions with affiliate companies.


ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY: Moody's Affirms $35MM Series 2007 Bonds at B1
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed Roosevelt University's B1 on
approximately $35 million of Series 2007 revenue bonds. The bonds
were issued through the Illinois Finance Authority. The outlook
remains negative.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The affirmation of the B1 reflects maintenance of unrestricted
liquidity and observable near-term progress in operating
performance. Management continues to work through its plan to
achieve operational stability, taking various measures such as
expense reductions, a moderate change to the university's debt
structure and the monetization of real estate. Management expects
further improvement to operations in fiscal 2020. However, the
university continues to operate at a deficit, with insufficient
operating cash flow to cover debt service. Roosevelt's very high
financial leverage and associated fixed costs continue to remain
unaffordable at its current scale, resulting in fundamental
financial imbalance and an unsustainable operating model absent
material changes.

Enrollment declines should moderate with a freshmen class that is
anticipated to be similar with fall 2019 and retention rates that
are showing signs of improvement. The credit impact of a proposed
integration with nearby Robert Morris University Illinois is
uncertain at this point.

Roosevelt retains highly valuable and marketable real estate that
secures the Series 2018A, 2018B and 2019A bonds, while the rated
Series 2007 bonds do not have the same secured interest in
collateral.

RATING OUTLOOK

The negative outlook reflects uncertainty around the impact of the
pending integration to Roosevelt's unrestricted liquidity and
operating performance. Failure to make further progress on its plan
to achieve fiscal balance in a comparatively short period of time
or a material decline in liquid reserves would result in rating
pressure.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE

  - Substantial and sustained improvement in operating performance
that provides over 1.0x debt service coverage

  - Significant strengthening of student market evidenced by
sustained growth of net tuition revenue and enrollment stability

  - Material growth of cash and investments and liquidity relative
to debt and operations

  - Substantial deleveraging so that fixed costs become more
affordable

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE

  - Decline of unrestricted liquidity

  - Inability to continue improvement of operating performance

  - Failure to stabilize enrollment and grow net tuition revenue

LEGAL SECURITY

All bonds are a general obligation, secured by the university's
gross revenues. The unrated Series 2018A, 2018B and 2019A bonds
have a cash-funded debt service reserve fund and a mortgage pledge
on the university's Schaumburg campus and most of the university's
Chicago campus. There is an additional bonds test. The Series 2007
bonds do not have a DSRF or a mortgage pledge.

The Series 2018A, 2018B and 2019A bonds contain an unrestricted
cash and investments to MADS covenant that is tested twice
annually. Roosevelt must maintain coverage of no less than 150%
through fiscal 2022, no less than 175% in fiscal years 2023 and
2024, and no less than 200% in fiscal 2025 and beyond. Failure to
do so would require consultative review with a cure period that
extends several years. As of the last reporting date, Roosevelt
reported 3.0x coverage.

USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable

PROFILE

Founded in 1945, Roosevelt University is a moderate sized private
university offering undergraduate, graduate, and professional
degree programs at its campuses in downtown Chicago and in
Schaumburg, a northwest suburb of Chicago, and online. The
university enrolled 3,583 full-time equivalent students in Fall
2019.

METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in this rating was Higher Education
published in May 2019.


RWS CHARTER: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
----------------------------------------------
Debtor: RWS Charter LLC
        303-D Beltline Place SW
        Decatur, AL 35603

Business Description: RWS Charter LLC is a privately held company
                      in the scheduled air transportation
                      business.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 13, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Alabama

Case No.: 20-80470

Debtor's Counsel: Tazewell T. Shepard, Esq.
                  SPARKMAN, SHEPARD & MORRIS, P.C.
                  303 Williams Avenue, Suite 1411
                  Huntsville, AL 35801
                  Tel: 256-512-9924
                  Email: taze@ssmattorneys.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Rex Rankin, owner.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

                     https://is.gd/yOADtF


SAGG MAIN: Unsecureds Are Unimpaired in Plan
--------------------------------------------
Sagg Main INV LLC, filed a Plan of Reorganization and a Disclosure
Statement.

The Debtor owns a 99% membership interest in 219 Sagg Main LLC,
which, in turn, was, as of the Filing Date, the fee owner of a
high-end residential property and complex located at 219 Sagg Main
Street, Sagaponack, New York.  

The Plan proposes to treat claims and interests as follows:

  * CLASS 1 – Priority Claims: Class 1 consists of the Allowed
Priority Claims other  than Allowed Tax Claims.  Class 1 Claims
total in the aggregate approximately $0. Class 1 Claims, if any,
will be paid in full in Cash on or shortly after the Effective
Date. The Allowed Class 1 Claims are unimpaired and, as such, the
holders of such Allowed Claims shall be deemed to accept the Plan.

  * CLASS 2 – Allowed General Unsecured Claims.  UNIMPAIRED.
Class 4 consists of the holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims.  In
addition to Atalaya's disputed Claim in the estimated amount of
$12,000,000, the IRS has asserted an Unsecured Claim in the amount
of $17,188.  Each holder of an Allowed Class 2 Unsecured Claim, if
any, shall be paid in full, with Interest.  

  * CLASS 3 - Equity Interests.  The holders of Class 3 Interests
will receive the net proceeds from the Sale after the payment of
all unclassified and classified Claims.

The Plan shall be funded from the proceeds from the refinance or
sale.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated February 5,
2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/qqsrpvb from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Proposed Attorneys for the Debtor:

     Robert L. Rattet, Esq.
     DAVIDOFF HUTCHER & CITRON LLP
     605 Third Avenue
     New York, New York 10158
     Tel: (212) 557-7200

                     About Sagg Main INV

Sagg Main INV, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. N.Y. Case No. 20-70026) on Jan. 2,
2020.  Judge Robert E. Grossman oversees the case.  The Debtor is
represented by Robert L. Rattet, Esq., at Davidoff Hutcher & Citron
LLP.


SAI SB CENTER: March 3 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
-------------------------------------------------------
Eugene D. Roth, attorney for debtor SAI SB Center, LLC, filed with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey a Plan and
Disclosure Statement.  On Jan. 23, 2020, Judge Christine M.
Gravelle ordered that:

  * March 3, 2020, at 2:00 pm, before Honorable Christine M.
Gravelle in Courtroom 3, USBC, 402 East State Street, Trenton NJ
08608, is the hearing on the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement.

  * Notice of the said hearing shall be sent by the Clerk of the
Bankruptcy Court in accordance with the provisions of Bankruptcy
Rule 3017 (a) at least 28 days prior to the hearing date.

  * Written objections to the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement
shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court and served upon counsel
for the Debtor, Counsel for the Creditor’s Committee and upon the
United States Trustee no later than 14 days prior to the hearing
before this Court.

  * No creditor or other party in interest will be heard in
opposition to the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement without good
cause, unless such party shall have served and filed such objection
within the aforementioned time.

A full-text copy of the order dated January 23, 2020, is available
at https://tinyurl.com/wvca979 from PacerMonitor at no charge.

                       About SAI SB Center

SAI SB Center, LLC was formed in February of 2014 in order to
acquire property located at 4064 US 1 Monmouth Junction, New Jersey
(the "Property"). The Property was acquired for the potential
long-term development opportunity due to its location. The Property
had the added benefit of being adjacent to existing property owned
by the principal of the Debtor for a larger development.

SAI SB Center, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.J.
Case No. 19-28195) on Sept. 24, 2019. Eugene D. Roth, Esq., at the
LAW OFFICE OF EUGENE D. ROTH, is the Debtor's counsel.


SALEM CITY, NJ: Moody's Alters Outlook on GOULT Rating to Stable
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed the Ba3 rating on the City
of Salem, NJ's outstanding general obligation unlimited tax and
GOULT-guaranteed debt. The outlook has been revised to stable from
negative. Concurrently, Moody's has affirmed the Baa1 enhanced
rating on the city's Series 2012 GO bonds, which are enhanced under
the New Jersey Municipal Qualified Bond Program.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba3 GOULT rating reflects the fact that the city faces a
long-term liability it likely cannot afford. Salem has provided a
large guaranty for debt issued to fund an office building project.
The city has provided budgetary support to the project in recent
years. Debt service is expected to escalate significantly beginning
in 2028 and the size of the liability relative to the city's budget
poses risks of significant bondholder loss in the future. The city
also has a very weak tax base and demographic profile including low
resident wealth and income and elevated poverty.

The Baa1 enhanced rating applies to the city's 2012 GO bonds (not
the guaranteed debt for the office building) and reflects the
enhancement provided by the New Jersey Municipal Qualified Bond
Program, a state aid intercept program, and is notched once off the
State of New Jersey's (A3 stable) rating. Coverage of qualified
debt service by qualified state aid is greater than sum
sufficient.

RATING OUTLOOK

The revision of the outlook to stable from negative does not
indicate any amelioration of the city's long-term credit risk.
Rather it acknowledges that the city has sufficiently strengthened
its finances to adequately deal with the immediate financial
situation. The risk associated with the guaranteed debt is still
several years away and, as such, is outside the range of an
outlook.

The stable outlook on the New Jersey Municipal Qualified Bond
Program enhanced debt matches the state's stable outlook, which
reflects that the current A3 rating of the state is well positioned
in the near term due to solid economic performance and improved
budget flexibility in fiscal 2019. In the longer term, the state's
credit profile could weaken as already large long-term liabilities
grow and the state's budget is challenged by growing pension
contributions in a low revenue growth environment.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE

  - Long-term prospects for city-guaranteed debt to become
permanently self-sustaining

  - Demonstrated ability to meet guaranty if called in full

  - Significant and sustained improvement in liquidity and Current
Fund balance

  - Material improvements in the city's resident wealth and income

  - Improvement in the State of New Jersey's GO rating (enhanced
rating only)

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE

  - Deterioration in Current Fund balance and/or cash reserves

  - Material declines in the tax base or resident wealth and
income

  - Loss of tenant or increase in costs leading to large call on
city guaranty

  - Demonstration of a lack of willingness to meet guaranty if
called

  - Absence of positive development which would tend to render the
city-guaranteed debt self-sustaining

  - Downgrade in the State of New Jersey's GO rating (enhanced
rating only)

  - Reduction in coverage of qualified debt service by qualified
revenues (enhanced rating only)

LEGAL SECURITY

Salem's bonds, including its guaranty of the Salem County
Improvement Authority's 2007 Finlaw State Office Building Project
bonds, are secured by the city's general obligation unlimited tax
pledge. The Series 2012 bonds are additionally enhanced by the
State of New Jersey's Municipal Qualified Bond Program. The Series
2007 guaranteed bonds are not enhanced.

PROFILE

Salem is the county seat of Salem County (A1). It is located in the
southwestern part of the state across the Delaware River from the
State of Delaware (Aaa stable). The city has a population of
approximately 5,000.

METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in the underlying ratings was US
Local Government General Obligation Debt published in September
2019. The principal methodology used in the enhanced rating was
State Aid Intercept Programs and Financings published in December
2017.



SBL HOLDINGS: Fitch Rates $375MM Series A Preferred Stock 'BB'
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a rating of 'BB' to SBL Holdings, Inc.'s
issuance of $375 million of 7.00% Series A non-cumulative perpetual
preferred stock. Existing ratings assigned to SBLH, its
subsidiaries, and their respective obligations are unaffected by
Fitch's rating action.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The assignment of the rating follows the receipt of final
documentation conforming to information already received. The
rating is in line with the expected rating assigned on Jan. 29,
2020.

The issue rating is notched two notches below SBLH's IDR based on
'Poor' recovery expectations, with one additional notch for
'minimal' non-performance risk. Fitch's approach for notching
reflects the regulatory environment of the U.S., which is assessed
as being Effective and classified as following a Ring Fencing
approach.

Based on Fitch's insurance rating criteria, the new non-cumulative
perpetual preferred stock is expected to receive 100% equity credit
in evaluating financial leverage.

Net proceeds from this new issue are expected to be used to repay a
portion of the company's outstanding revolving loan balances. Fitch
anticipates that financial leverage will decline modestly as a
result of the transaction and that GAAP based fixed-charge coverage
will remain in line with Fitch's guidelines.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Key rating sensitivities that could result in an upgrade include:

A material declines in Fitch's view of asset risk (including the
decline in short-term loans as a percentage of invested assets)
while maintaining PRISM score well into the "Strong" category,
financial leverage below 20%, GAAP interest coverage greater than
10x and a GAAP ROE of 15% or greater.

Key rating sensitivities that could result in a downgrade include:

Deterioration in the quality of the asset portfolio, a sustained
deterioration in capital resulting in a Prism score below the
"Strong" category, GAAP ROE below 10%, GAAP interest coverage of
less than 7x or financial leverage above 25%.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of 3 - ESG issues are credit
neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either
due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by
the entity.


SENSATA TECHNOLOGIES: Moody's Affirms Ba2 CFR, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the ratings of Sensata
Technologies B.V. and its wholly owned subsdiaries, including the
Ba2 corporate family rating, the Ba3 senior unsecured and Baa3
secured ratings, and assigned a stable outlook at Sensata
Technologies, Inc. Moody's also upgraded the Speculative Grade
Liquidity Rating to SGL-1 from SGL-2. The ratings outlook is
stable.

In addition, Moody's has corrected the issuer on the $450 million
senior notes due 2030 to Sensata Technologies, Inc. from Sensata
Technologies B.V. Due to an internal administrative error, the
notes previously reflected Sensata Technologies B.V. as the
issuer.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Sensata's ratings consider its solid competitive position in the
specialized and fragmented sensors and controls market,
long-standing customer base, exposure as a supplier to automotive
OEMs, and track record of strong margins and relatively moderate
financial leverage.

About 58.8% of Sensata's 2019 revenue was from the automotive
industry, where production is expected to decline into 2020.
Nevertheless, Moody's expects Sensata's free cash flow (cash from
operations less capex less dividends) will exceed $400 million in
2020 producing a relatively strong ratio of free cash flow to debt
of about 13%. Sensata's EBITA margin has been consistently over
20%, and Moody's expects a similar level into 2020 along with
debt-to-EBITDA below 4x (after Moody's standard adjustments).
Moody's anticipates Sensata will maintain a prudent strategy around
leverage and liquidity which, combined with its market position and
control over operating costs, will enable Sensata to manage the
cyclicality in the auto sector and Sensata's other end markets.

Sensata's SGL-1 Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating reflects very
good liquidity characterized by the expectation of strong free cash
flow and manageable debt maturities, cash of around $700 million
and ample revolver availability.

Environmental, social, and governance considerations have been
factored into the ratings. Environmentally, Sensata is not at
significant risk of any environmental investigations or
settlements. Sensata's products offer environmentally friendly
solutions to its customers. Sensata's social risk is relatively
minimal with less than 1% of the workforce covered by collective
bargaining agreements and generally positive relations with its
employees.

Governance is solid with Sensata is in the midst of a planned CEO
transition, as Sensata's President is being elevated to the CEO
position. The President & CEO-elect, Mr. Jeffrey Cote, held a
number of executive positions within Sensata. The sitting CEO, Ms.
Martha Sullivan, will remain on the Board of Directors.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that topline
pressure from challenging end market conditions will persist for
the foreseeable future, but that the company will continue to
mitigate some of the impact by quickly realigning internal costs
with external demand, ultimately maintaining healthy margins and
cash flow generation. The stable outlook also considers the
company's successful track record of integrating meaningful
acquisitions and deleveraging following acquisitions, although
Moody's does not anticipate a large, transformative acquisition in
the near-term.

The ratings could be upgraded if debt-to-EBITDA is sustained below
3.5 times, free cash flow-to-debt increases to above 15%, and EBITA
margins are maintained in excess of 20%. Alternatively, the ratings
could be downgraded if Moody's expects debt-to-EBITDA will be
sustained over 4.25 times, free cash flow-to-debt falls to under
10%, EBITDA-to-interest falls below 4.5 times, liquidity weakens,
or the company institutes a more aggressive financial policy
focusing on excessive shareholder returns.

The following rating actions were taken:

Affirmations:

Issuer: Sensata Technologies B.V.

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba2

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba2-PD

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Ba3 (LGD4,
  from LGD5)

Issuer: Sensata Technologies UK Financing Co. plc

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Ba3 (LGD4,
  from LGD5)

Issuer: Sensata Technologies, Inc.

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Baa3 (LGD2)

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Ba3 (LGD4,
  from LGD5)

Upgrades:

Issuer: Sensata Technologies B.V.

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Upgraded to SGL-1 from SGL-2

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Sensata Technologies B.V.

  Outlook, Remains Stable

Issuer: Sensata Technologies UK Financing Co. plc

  Outlook, Remains Stable

Issuer: Sensata Technologies, Inc.

  Outlook, Assigned Stable

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global
Manufacturing Companies published in June 2017.

Sensata Technologies B.V., Sensata Technologies UK Financing Co.
plc and Sensata Technologies, Inc., are indirect wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Sensata Technologies Holding plc, which is a global
manufacturer of sensors and controls products for the automotive,
industrial, HVAC, and aerospace markets. The company's products
include sensors measuring pressure/force/speed, thermal and
magnetic-hydraulic circuit breakers, and switches. Revenues for the
year ended December 31, 2019 were approximately $3.45 billion.



SOUTH COAST BEHAVIORAL: Given More Time to File Exit Plan
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California
granted South Coast Behavioral Health, Inc. a four-month extension
of its right to exclusively file a Chapter 11 plan and a six-month
extension to solicit acceptances for the plan.

The company's current exclusive filing period and solicitation
period will expire on Feb. 18 and April 17, respectively.

The serial violations of the automatic stay that occurred
post-petition damaged the company's operations and consumed legal
time and resources that would otherwise have been committed to a
plan of reorganization. Currently, the company has made great
strides towards recovering from the damages caused by these
violations of the automatic stay and it is on the cusp of achieving
profitability.

The extension will give the company enough time to convert these
achievements into concrete financial results of a kind that will
support either a plan effort or a sale.

                About South Coast Behavioral Health

South Coast Behavioral Health, Inc. -- https://www.scbh.com/ -- is
a healthcare company that specializes in the in-patient and
outpatient treatment of addicts, alcoholics, and persons dealing
with mental health issues.  It offers a clinically supervised
residential sub acute detox services, therapeutic and residential
treatment centers, intensive outpatient treatment services, and
partial hospitalization programs.

South Coast Behavioral Health sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-12375) on June
20, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets
of between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.  Judge Mark S. Wallace oversees the case.  Nicastro &
Associates, P.C., is the Debtor's legal counsel.


SOUTHCROSS ENERGY: Martinez Wants Plan to Comply With Stipulation
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Creditor Lisa Bueno Martinez filed an objection to the chapter 11
plan of Southcross Energy Partners, L.P., Southcross Energy
Partners GP, LLC, and Southcross’s wholly-owned direct and
indirect subsidiaries, and respectfully represents:

On May 20, 2019, the Debtors and Martinez submitted a Motion for
Entry of an Order Approving a Stipulation between the Debtors and
Martinez for an order for relief from the automatic stay.  On June
10, 2019, the Court entered an Order Approving the Stipulation.

Martinez notes that the proposed chapter 11 plan does not appear to
specifically allow the claims in the Stipulation to continue in
state court as agreed in the Stipulation.

Martinez objects to the proposed chapter 11 plan to the extent that
the chapter 11 plan may or does adversely affect her ability to
continue with the state court lawsuit as agreed in the
Stipulation.

Martinez seeks a provision in the confirmation or an amendment to
the chapter 11 plan that specifically authorizes her to continue in
the state court case with the Debtor Defendants named as parties
but with any recovery limited to the available insurance coverage
as set forth in the Stipulation.

A full-text copy of the objection dated Jan. 21, 2020, is available
at https://tinyurl.com/rgaw6g3 from PacerMonitor at no charge.

Lisa Bueno Martinez is represented by:

        BAKER & ASSOCIATES
        Reese W. Baker
        950 Echo Lane, Suite 300
        Houston, Texas 77024
        Telephone: (713) 979-2251
        Facsimile: (713) 869-9100

        CRAIG SMITH
        14493 S.P.I.D., Suite 240
        P.M.D. 240
        Corpus Christi, Texas 78418
        Telephone: (361) 728-8037
        Facsimile: (361) 728-8037

                About Southcross Energy Partners

Southcross Energy Partners, L.P. --http://www.southcrossenergy.com/
-- is a publicly traded company that provides midstream services to
natural gas producers and customers, including natural gas
gathering, processing, treatment and compression, and access to
natural gas liquid (NGL) fractionation and transportation services.
It also purchases and sells natural gas and NGLs. Its assets are
located in South Texas, Mississippi and Alabama, and include two
cryogenic gas processing plants, a fractionation facility and
approximately 3,100 miles of pipeline. The South Texas assets are
located in or near the Eagle Ford shale region. Southcross Energy
is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Southcross Energy Partners and its affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case
No. 19-10702) on April 1, 2019. The Debtors disclosed total assets
of $610.4 million and total liabilities of $614.3 million as of
April 1, 2019.

The cases are assigned to Judge Mary F. Walrath.

The Debtors tapped Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP as bankruptcy counsel;
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP as Delaware counsel; Alvarez &
Marsal as financial advisor; Evercore Group LLC as investment
banker; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as notice and claims
agent and administrative advisor.


SOUTHERN FOODS: Joshua D. Haar Represents Equity Shareholders
-------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
the law firm of Joshua D. Haar, Esq. submitted a verified statement
to disclose that it is representing the Ad Hoc Group of Equity
Shareholders in the Chapter 11 cases of Southern Foods Group, LLC,
et al.

As of Feb. 10, 2020, members of the Ad Hoc Group of Equity
Shareholders and their disclosable economic interests are:

Dr. L.S. Smith
519 Interstate 30, #243
Rockwall, TX 75087

* Approximately 800,000 shares

Susan L. Poole
9753 South Hoyne Avenue
Chicago, IL 60643

* Approximately 770,000 shares

Fausto R. Herrera
1101 Midland Avenue #325
Bronxville, NY 10708

* Approximately 345,000 shares

Robert Papiri
P.O. Box 110672
Campbell, CA 95011

* Approximately 325,000 shares

The above information was provided to Counsel by the respective
members of the Ad Hoc Group of Equity Shareholders. This
information is provided solely to comply with Rule 2019.

Joshua D. Haar, Esq. represents solely those persons listed in
connection with the above proceedings. Counsel does not represent
any interest of any other party-in-interest or other entity.

Neither the Ad Hoc Group of Equity Shareholders nor any member
thereof assumes any obligation or duty to or for any other party or
entity, or purports to act on behalf of any other party or entity
in connection with the above proceedings or otherwise.

No part of this Statement constitutes a limitation or waiver of any
right of any member of the Ad Hoc Group of Equity Shareholders
under applicable law, with respect to the above proceedings or
otherwise.

The Ad Hoc Group of Equity Shareholders, through its undersigned
counsel, reserves the right to amend or supplement this Statement
as necessary or as required by rule.

Counsel for the Ad Hoc Group of Equity Shareholders can be reached
at:

          Joshua D. Haar, Esq.
          1495 Paddock Road
          West Edmeston, NY 13485
          Tel: 315-825-8106
          E-mail: jhaar@fdwcpa.net

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/XfBDiS

                    About Southern Foods

Southern Foods Group, LLC, d/b/a Dean Foods, is a food and beverage
company and a processor and direct-to-store distributor of fresh
fluid milk and other dairy and dairy case products in the United
States.

The Company and its 40+ affiliates filed for bankruptcy protection
on Nov. 12, 2019 (Bankr. S.D. Texas, Lead Case No. 19-36313).  The
petitions were signed by Gary Rahlfs, senior vice president and
chief financial officer.  Judge David Jones presides over the
cases.

The Debtors posted estimated assets and liabilities of $1 billion
to $10 billion.

David Polk & Wardell LLP serves as general bankruptcy counsel to
the Debtors, and Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP serves as local
counsel.  Alvarez Marsal is financial advisor to the Debtors,
Evercore Group LLC is investment banker, and Epiq Corporate
Restructuring LLC is notice and claims agent.


SPINEGUARD INC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: SpineGuard, Inc.
        1434 Spruce Street, Suite 100
        Boulder, CO 80302

Business Description: Based in San Francisco, California,
                      SpineGuard, Inc. --
                      https://www.spineguard.com -- is an importer
                      and distributor of single-use, disposable,
                      Dynamic Surgical Guidance (DSG) instruments
                      that measure the density of tissue and
                      enable surgeons to drill holes into the
                      pedicles of a vertebral body in the spine
                      during spinal fusion surgery, safely and
                      without damaging nerves.  The Debtor is a
                      wholly-owned subsidiary of SpineGuard, S.A.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 13, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Delaware

Case No.: 20-10332

Judge: Hon. John T. Dorsey

Debtor's Counsel: Neal L. Wolf, Esq.
                  HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
                  1676 No. California Blvd.
                  Suite 620
                  Walnut Creek, CA 94596
                  Tel: (415) 995-5015
                  E-mail: nwolf@hansonbridgett.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Steve McAdoo, general manager, USA.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                     https://is.gd/bb00eK


STONE OAK MEMORY: Exclusivity Period Extended to March 29
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas
extended the exclusive periods for Stone Oak Memory Care, LLC to
propose a Chapter 11 plan and solicit acceptances for the plan to
March 29 and May 28, respectively.

The extension of the exclusivity periods will provide the Debtor
with sufficient time to determine the possibility of refinancing
its secured debt.  While Stone Oak has made significant progress
repairing its financial operations and has stabilized the expense
side of its ledger, the company has not had sufficient time to
evaluate the effect of new management and rebranding of its adult
memory care facility on occupancy. Revenue from increased occupancy
requires minimal variable costs and falls almost entirely to the
company's bottom line, according to court filings.

                    About Stone Oak Memory Care

Stone Oak Memory Care, LLC, which conducts business under the name
Autumn Leaves of Stone Oak, owns and operates an adult memory care
facility in Dallas, Texas.

Stone Oak Memory Care sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D.
Tex. Case No. 19-52375) on Sept. 30, 2019 in San Antonio, Texas.
The petition was signed by Darryl Freling, president of
MedProperties Stone Oak Mgr, LL.  As of the petition date, the
Debtor was estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in assets
and liabilities.  Judge Ronald B. King oversees the Debtor's case.


The Debtor tapped the Law Offices of Ray Battaglia, PLLC as its
legal counsel, and HMP Advisory Holdings, LLC as its financial
advisor.

Susan N. Goodman is the patient care ombudsman for the company.


TARONIS TECHNOLOGIES: Mitchell Kopin, et al. Report 0.3% Stake
--------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Mitchell P. Kopin, Daniel B. Asher, and Intracoastal
Capital LLC disclosed that as of Dec. 31, 2019, they beneficially
own 74,500 shares of common stock of Taronis Technologies, Inc.,
which represents 0.3% of the shares outstanding.  The beneficial
ownership of approximately 0.3% of the Common Stock was based on
(1) 28,832,477 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of Dec. 12,
2019 as reported by the Issuer, plus (2) 54,500 shares of Common
Stock issuable upon exercise of Intracoastal Warrant 1 and (3)
20,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of
Intracoastal Warrant 2.  A full-text copy of the regulatory filing
is available for free at the SEC's website at:

                        https://is.gd/H1ctER

                    About Taronis Technologies

Clearwater, Florida-based Taronis Technologies Taronis
Technologies, Inc. (TRNX) is a technology-based company that is
focused on addressing the global constraints on natural resources,
including fuel and water.  The Company's two core technology
applications -- renewable fuel gasification and water
decontamination/sterilization -- are derived from its patented and
proprietary Plasma Arc Flow System.  The Plasma Arc Flow System
works by generating a combination of electric current, heat,
ultraviolet light and ozone, that affects the feedstock run through
the system to create a chosen outcome, depending on whether the
system is in "gasification mode" or "sterilization mode".  The
Company operates 22 locations across California, Texas, Louisiana,
and Florida.

Taronis reported a net loss of $15.04 million in 2018 following a
net loss of $11.02 million in 2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, Taronis
had $47.76 million in total assets, $11.49 million in total
liabilities, and $36.27 million in total stockholders' equity.

Marcum LLP, in New York, NY, the Company's auditor since 2016,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated April
12, 2019, citing that the Company has incurred significant losses,
continued to have negative cash flows from its operating
activities, and needs to raise additional funds to meet its
obligations and sustain its operations.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


TARONIS TECHNOLOGIES: Offering up to $8 Million Common Shares
-------------------------------------------------------------
Taronis Technologies, Inc., entered into a sales agreement with The
Benchmark Company, LLC pursuant to which the Agent will act as the
Company's sales agent with respect to the issuance and sale of up
to $8,000,000 of the Company's shares of common stock, par value
$0.001 per share, from time to time in an at-the-market public
offering.

Sales of the Shares, if any, through the Agent, will be made
directly on The Nasdaq Capital Market or on any other existing
trading market for the Company's common stock.  The Company will
pay the Agent a commission equal to 5.0% of the gross proceeds from
the sale of the Shares pursuant to the Agreement.  In addition, the
Company has agreed to reimburse the Agent for certain of its
expenses incurred in connection with the Offering, including fees
and expenses of its counsel of up to $20,000.

The Agreement will terminate on Jan. 9, 2021, unless terminated
earlier pursuant to the terms of the Agreement.  The Agreement
contains representations, warranties and covenants that are
customary for transactions of this type.  The Company has agreed to
indemnify the Agent against certain liabilities as set forth in the
Agreement.

The Shares will be sold and issued pursuant the Company's shelf
registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-230854), which was
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 24, 2019, and a related prospectus supplement.

                   About Taronis Technologies

Clearwater, Florida-based Taronis Technologies Taronis
Technologies, Inc. (TRNX) is a technology-based company that is
focused on addressing the global constraints on natural resources,
including fuel and water.  The Company's two core technology
applications -- renewable fuel gasification and water
decontamination/sterilization -- are derived from its patented and
proprietary Plasma Arc Flow System.  The Plasma Arc Flow System
works by generating a combination of electric current, heat,
ultraviolet light and ozone, that affects the feedstock run through
the system to create a chosen outcome, depending on whether the
system is in "gasification mode" or "sterilization mode".  The
Company operates 22 locations across California, Texas, Louisiana,
and Florida.

Taronis reported a net loss of $15.04 million in 2018 following a
net loss of $11.02 million in 2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, Taronis
had $47.76 million in total assets, $11.49 million in total
liabilities, and $36.27 million in total stockholders' equity.

Marcum LLP, in New York, NY, the Company's auditor since 2016,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated April
12, 2019, citing that the Company has incurred significant losses,
continued to have negative cash flows from its operating
activities, and needs to raise additional funds to meet its
obligations and sustain its operations.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


TENDER LOVING HOME: To Seek Plan Confirmation March 19
------------------------------------------------------
Judge Gregory L. Taddonio has ordered that the Disclosure Statement
filed by Tender Loving Home Health Care, Inc., is conditionally
APPROVED.

On March 19, 2020, at 9:30 a.m., the Court will hold a hearing to
consider final approval of the Disclosure Statement and
confirmation of the Plan in Courtroom A, 54th Floor, U.S. Steel
Tower, 600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15219.

On or before Feb. 12, 2020, the Debtor(s) will mail a copy of this
Order, the Disclosure Statement, the Plan Summary, the Plan and
Ballot to all creditors.

Ballots accepting or rejecting the Plan, and objections to
confirmation of the Plan are due March 10, 2020.

              About Tender Loving Home Health Care

Tender Loving Home Health Care, Inc., operates a home health care
business in which the majority of the revenue comes from operating
group homes for individuals who need assisted living.

It previously sought bankruptcy protection on Oct. 14, 2015 (Bankr.
W.D. Pa. Case No. 15-23759).

Tender Loving Home Health Care filed its voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa.
Case No. 19-22486) on June 21, 2019.

In the petition signed by Reid A. Bromwell, chairman of the Board
of Directors, the Debtor estimated $100,000 to $500,000 in assets
and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  The case is assigned
to Judge Gregory L. Taddonio.  Donald R. Calaiaro, Esq., at
Calaiaro Valencik is the Debtor's counsel.


TEXAS ROADRUNNER: $50K Sale of 3 Pacer Trailers to A & A Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert L. Jones of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas authorized Texas Roadrunner Express, LLC's sale
of the following three semi-truck trailers to A & A Gonzalez
Trucking, LLC for $50,000, cash or by cashier's check: (i)
1999/Pacer Trailer, VIN 1C9FA4028X1257549; (ii) 1999/Pacer Trailer,
VIN 1CQFA4026X1257582; and (iii) 1996/Pacer Trailer, VIN
1C9FA4020T1257071.

The sum will be deposited into the Northern Law Trust account of
the Debtor's attorney, Van W. Northern at Amarillo National Bank,
account number 755362.

Upon receipt of such funds and the entry of the Order, the funds in
the Trust account will be paid to Interstate Bank and credited
first to Note 60227 and then to Note 60327 which are secured by the
three trailers, whereupon Interstate Bank will promptly release its
lien, and deliver title to the trailers, subject to any financing
lien of FirstBank Southwest.

The Debtor will then promptly surrender possession of the three
trailers to A&A.

                About Texas Roadrunner Express

Texas Roadrunner Express, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-20361) on Nov.
15, 2019.  In the petition signed by Delfino I. Moreno, managing
member, the Debtor was estimated to have under $50,000 in assets
and under $500,000 in debt.  The Debtor is represented by Van W.
Northern, Esq., at Northern Legal, P.C.


TEXAS ROADRUNNER: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert L. Jones of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas authorized Texas Roadrunner Express, LLC to use
cash collateral realized from the collection of accounts receivable
on an interim basis and in accordance with and to pay expenses set
forth in the Budget.

A hearing on the Debtor's request for continued use of cash
collateral is set for March 12, 2020 at 1:30 p.m.

The Debtor will make adequate protection payments to Interstate
Bank during the interim period in the amount of the outstanding
accrued, matured interest owed against the principal balance owed
on the Notes at the note rate of interest on or before March 10,
2020. In addition, the Debtor will make a payment of $5,000 in
certified funds to cure the default under the second interim order
on use of cash collateral.

Interstate Bank is granted a replacement lien and security interest
in the Debtor's post-petition accounts receivable generated by the
Debtor's freight services operations in an amount equal to the
amount of cash collateral used, in the same priority and in the
same nature, extent and validity as such liens, if any, existed
pre-petition.

The Debtor will maintain the Surrendered Collateral (tractors and
other collateral) at the Debtor's yard in Perryton, Texas and will
protect the Surrendered Collateral in a reasonably prudent manner
so as to prevent any further diminishment of value of the
Surrendered Collateral. In addition, the Debtor must maintain all
current insurance coverages, especially the current physical damage
coverage on the Surrendered Collateral until such time as the
Surrendered Collateral is in the possession, custody, and control
of Interstate Bank, which Interstate Bank agrees to take all
reasonable measures to acquire once the order on the agreed motion
for relief from automatic stay is entered by the Court.

On all remaining tractors and vehicles retained by the Debtor which
continue to serve as collateral to Interstate Bank, the Debtor must
increase the current physical damage coverage limits on the
Remaining Collateral to amounts sufficient to cover the value of
the Remaining Collateral, so that after taking into account the
$2,500 deductible or any other deductible owing on the insurance
policy, the insured amount equals the amount of the Remaining
Collateral.

Upon reasonable request, the Debtor will provide access to its
books and records to Interstate Bank, or its agents, for inspection
during normal business hours and further permit Interstate Bank, or
its agents, to inspect and copy such records at Interstate Bank's
expense. The Debtor will also cooperate and accommodate Interstate
Bank with access to its location or the location of the Surrendered
and Remaining Collateral, for the purposes of inspecting,
appraising, or both.

A copy of the Third Agreed Order is available at PacerMonitor.com
at https://is.gd/JxKGNe at no charge.

                About Texas Roadrunner Express

Texas Roadrunner Express, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-20361) on Nov.
15, 2019.  In the petition signed by Delfino I. Moreno, managing
member, the Debtor was estimated to have under $50,000 in assets
and under $500,000 in debt.  The Debtor is represented by Van W.
Northern, Esq., at Northern Legal, P.C.



THOMAS HEALTH: Wins Interim Approval to Use Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Frank W. Volk authorized Thomas Health System, Inc., and
debtor affiliates to use the pre-petition collateral, including
cash collateral, to pay the ordinary and reasonable expenses of
operating their businesses in accordance the terms of this interim
order and the budget from the Petition Date until the earlier of:

   (a) the entry of a final order,
   (b) a further interim order mutually acceptable to the Debtors
and Bond Trustee, or
   (c) the termination of this interim order on its terms.

Pursuant to the Court order:

   * the bond trustee is granted valid, binding continuing,
enforceable, fully perfected security interest and liens upon all
assets and property of the Debtors and their estates to the extent
of any diminution in value of the pre-petition collateral during
the interim use period.

   * the bond trustee is granted an allowed super-priority
administrative expense claim in the Chapter 11 cases pursuant to
Sections 503(b) and 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code to the extent of
diminution in value and to the extent the adequate protection liens
are later proven to be inadequate, junior only to the pre-petition
liens, adequate protection liens and the carve-out.

The carve-out includes up to $50,000 of Court-allowed fees and
expenses of a trustee appointed under Section 726(b) of the
Bankruptcy Code, up to $250,000 of professional fees of Debtors'
professionals and up to $35,000 in aggregate of professional fees
of Committee's professionals, in each case, incurred after the
occurrence of a termination event, plus all fees required to be
paid to the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Trustee.  

A final hearing on the motion is scheduled on February 19, 2020 at
1:30 p.m. (Eastern time).  Objections must be filed by February 12,
2020 at 4 p.m. (Eastern time).  

A copy of the interim order is available at https://is.gd/AuGuIq
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                    About Thomas Health System

Thomas Health System, Inc., is a non-stock, non-profit corporation
incorporated under the laws of the State of West Virginia.  Formed
in 2006, Thomas Health System is the consolidated parent entity and
holding company whose primary function is to serve as the
controlling body of the affiliated debtors.  Thomas Health System
and its affiliated debtors collectively form a 391-bed hospital
system that employs nearly 1,700 individuals and an estimated 250
clinicians.

Thomas Health System sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Lead Case No. 20-20007) on Jan.
10, 2020.  At the time of the filing, Thomas Health System had
estimated assets of between $1 million and $10 million and
liabilities of between $100 million and $500 million.   

Judge Frank W. Volk oversees the case.

The Debtors tapped Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; Frost Brown Todd LLC as local counsel; Force Ten Partners,
LLC, as financial advisor; Splic Capital Advisors, LLC and Solic
Capital, LLC as investment banker; and Omni Management Group as
claims, notice and solicitation agent.


TNR HOLDINGS: Proposes Auction of All Assets
--------------------------------------------
Judge Meredith S. Grabill of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Louisiana authorized the bidding procedures of
TNR Holdings, LLC, Mesa Gulf Coast, LLC, and Tchefuncte Natural
Resources, LLC in connection with the auction sale of all assets.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Jan. 23, 2020.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Feb. 5, 2020 at 4:00 p.m.

     b. Initial Bid: Each Qualifying Bidder may then submit
successive bids in increments of at least $10,000 higher than the
bid at which the Auction commenced.

     c. Deposit: equal to or greater than 10% of the total Purchase
Price

     d. Auction: The Debtor will conduct the Auction starting at
10:00 a.m. (CT) on Feb. 7, 2020 at the law offices of The Derbes
Law Firm, LLC, 3027 Ridgelake Drive, Metairie, Louisiana 70002.

     e. Bid Increments: $5,000

     f. Sale Hearing: Feb. 14, 2020 at 1:00 p.m.

     g. Sale Objection Deadline: Feb. 12, 2020 at 5:00 p.m.

     h. Cure Notice Objection Deadline: Feb. 5, 2020 at 4:00 p.m.
(CT)

Only the Secured Lender (or its designee) will be permitted to
submit a credit bid at the Auction, and the Secured Lender will
notify the Debtor of its intention to potentially credit bid no
later than the Bid Deadline.  Any other party contending that it
has an allowed secured claim who wishes to submit a credit bid at
the Auction will notify the Debtor and the Secured Lender of its
intention to potentially credit bid no later than Jan. 31, 2020, at
12:00 p.m. in order to allow the parties to seek expedited relief
with the Court in advance of the Auction, if necessary, to resolve
any dispute over that party's lien rights and/or right to credit
bid.  In the absence of agreement or stipulation, the Court will
determine if the party desiring to credit bid is a Qualified
Bidder.  

The Sale Notice is approved.  It is reasonably calculated to
provide sufficient notice to non-Debtor counterparties of the
Debtors' intent to consummate the Sale with the Successful Bidder
and constitutes adequate notice of the Sale.  The Court finds that
good cause exists to shorten the 21-day notice period pursuant to
Bankruptcy Rule 2002(a)(2).  It will be served within five business
days of entry of the Order, upon each of the following parties: (i)
counsel to any committee appointed in these cases; (ii) the United
States Trustee for the Eastern District of Louisiana; (iii) all
other parties known to the Debtors who have or may have asserted
liens against any of the Assets; (iv) the Debtor's 30 largest
unsecured creditors; (v) all parties that have requested notice
pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002; and (vi) all other entities known
to have expressed an interest in a transaction with respect to all
or part of the Assets.

The assumption and assignment procedures set forth in the Sale
Motion are approved and made part of the Order as if fully set
forth.  The assumption and assignment procedures are appropriate
and fair to all non-Debtor counterparties and comply in all
respects with the Bankruptcy Code.

The Debtor will send the Cure Notice to any counterparties to any
Assigned Contract by the later of: (i) Jan. 27, 2020 or (ii) one
day after the entry of the Order.  The Cure Notice is approved.

Unless the contract counterparty or any other entity properly files
an objection to the supplemental Cure Notice within 10 days of the
date of the supplemental Cure Notice, the Debtor may assume and
assign the Assigned Contract subject to the occurrence of the
Closing,
without further order or notice of hearing.  If an objection is
filed and served within 10 days of the date of the supplemental
Cure Notice, and the objection cannot be resolved consensually,
such dispute will be heard and resolved at the Sale Hearing.

Notwithstanding the possible applicability of Bankruptcy Rules
6004(h), 6006(d), 7062, 9014 or otherwise or any Local Rules of the
Court, the terms and conditions of the Order will be immediately
effective and enforceable upon its entry.

The movant will serve a copy of the Order on the required parties
who will not receive notice through the ECF system pursuant to the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Local Bankruptcy
Rules and file a certificate of service to that effect within three
days.  

                      About TNR Holdings

TNR Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries are privately held oil and
gas exploration and production companies. TNR Holdings, LLC (Bankr.
E.D. La. Case No. 19-12531) is the parent company and sole member
of Mesa Gulf Coast, LLC (Case No. 19-12533) and Tchefuncte Natural
Resources, LLC (Case No. 19-12532). Tchefuncte is the lessee of
certain oil and gas fields located in South Louisiana, and the
owner of the oil and gas wells.  Mesa is the "Operator" of record
for the applicable wells in the fields.  Certain wells in a certain
field called the Valentine Field, however, are not operating at
maximum capacity and need repairs to optimize oil and gas
production.

On Sept. 20, 2019, the Debtors each filed a Chapter 11 petition
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Louisiana (New Orleans) in an effort to repair and sell the
Valentine Field in order to pay down the debt owed to Hancock
Whitney Bank.  As of the Petition Date, the Debtors owe Hancock
Whitney Bank more than $5,158,508.

In the petitions signed by John Leonard, CEO, TNR Holdings LLC
listed total assets at $620 and total liabilities at $6,340,276;
Tchefuncte Natural Resources, LLC recorded total assets at
$2,142,249 and total liabilities at $5,445,742; and Mesa Gulf
Coast, LLC reported total asset at $856,101 and total liabilities
at $8,192,663.

Judge Meredith S. Grabill is assigned the Debtors' cases.

The Derbes Law Firm, LLC, is counsel to the Debtors.


TRINITA PARETE: Case Summary & 7 Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Trinita Parete LLC
          DBA Ampia
          DBA Gnoccheria Wall Street
        100 Broad Street 2nd Floor
        New York, NY 10004

Business Description: Trinita Parete LLC is a privately held
                      company based in New York.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 12, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of New York

Case No.: 20-10413

Debtor's Counsel: Marc Scolnick, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF MARC SCOLNICK
                  84-03 Cuthbert Road
                  Suite 1B
                  Kew Gardens, NY 11415
                  Tel: 718-554-6445
                  Email: marc@scolnicklaw.com

Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Anisa Moloney, authorized
representative.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's seven unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                    https://is.gd/mjZGEt


UNIVAR SOLUTIONS: Fitch Affirms LT IDR at 'BB', Outlook Positive
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Rating of
Univar Solutions Inc. at 'BB'. Fitch has also affirmed the
'BB+'/'RR1' rating of UNVR's senior secured ABL facilities and term
loans and the 'BB'/'RR4' rating of the senior unsecured notes. The
Rating Outlook is Positive.

The Positive Outlook considers Univar's enhanced commercial
capabilities, increased scale and accelerated opportunity to
digitize and optimize the supply chain of the combined company
leading to a forecasted sub-3.5x gross leverage profile by 2021,
which is consistent with a 'BB+' rating. Gross debt reduction is
supported by the December 2019 completed sale of the company's
Environmental Sciences business and Fitch's expectation that
proceeds from the sale, as well as the company's FCF generation,
will be prioritized toward debt repayment.

The ratings reflect Univar's market position in chemicals and
ingredients distribution, its flexible and scalable operating
model, consistent and improving profit margins and considerable FCF
generation that Fitch projects will be prioritized toward gross
debt reduction. Univar consistently generates solid margins and FCF
despite its exposure to some cyclical end markets. The company's
continued progress in executing its strategic priorities and
adherence to its capital deployment priorities should help further
de-risk the financial profile.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Nexeo Enhances Operational; Credit Profiles: Fitch believes the
integration of Nexeo Solutions, LLC has largely gone according to
management's timeline, and that the March 2019 completed
acquisition further strengthened Univar's position as the second
largest distributor globally, after Brenntag AG, and the largest
distributor in the U.S. and Canada. The combined product portfolio
provides Univar with greater strength and the opportunity for
additional product capture from existing customers in its focused
higher-margin, higher-growth markets including light-weighting
adhesives and sealants, food ingredients, personal care, and
pharmaceutical ingredients. Nexeo essentially operates as a brand
extension of Univar, offering customer insights and trends to
continue to generate demand and sustainable growth given the
industry-leading service that has led to strong and long-standing
supplier and customer relationships.

Furthermore, Nexeo's acquired IT infrastructure and advanced ERP
systems eliminated the need for Univar to materially increase
spending, helping mitigate implementation risk and accelerate
Univar's digital transformation. As of third-quarter 2019,
management reiterated its expectations to capture $20 million in
net synergies in 2019 and a $120 million run rate of net synergies
by March 2022 that are largely tied to optimizing supply chain
networks and consolidating support functions.

Divestitures Accelerate Deleveraging: Univar targets a long-term
net-debt/EBITDA of 3.0x. The sale of Nexeo's plastic business for
$650 million allowed for additional de-leveraging, and further
emphasized management's focus on profitability and growth within
its specialty chemicals portfolio. Univar also recently announced
the sale of its noncore environmental sciences business for $195
million, with proceeds earmarked for further debt pay down. Fitch
projects the company will achieve total debt/EBITDA of around 3.0x
by 2021.

Consistent FCF Generation: Univar regularly generates strong,
positive FCF driven by modest capital requirements, consistent and
improving profit margins and efficient working capital management.
Fitch projects the combined company will generate around $300
million of annual FCF on average over the forecasted period,
providing the company with substantial financial flexibility to
pursue bolt-on acquisitions, deleverage and seek strategic growth
and savings opportunities.

Fragmented Market Provides Opportunity: The global chemical
distribution market is highly fragmented, with an estimated market
size of roughly $200 billion and where the top two distributors
account for only about 10% of the market. Benefiting from size,
scale and diversification, Univar is better able to navigate
logistical challenges and counterparty risk than smaller
competitors. The company contains the largest chemicals and
ingredients sales force in North America, the broadest product
offering and an increasingly efficient supply chain network,
allowing Univar to continue to grow through leveraging its
footprint to cover more products, customers and regions.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Univar is the second largest global chemical distributor, behind
Brenntag AG (unrated), and the largest North American chemical
distributor in what is a fragmented industry. Fitch compares Univar
with chemical distributor Brenntag AG (unrated), IT distributors
Ingram Micro, Inc. (BBB-/Stable) and Arrow Electronics, Inc.
(BBB-/Stable), and metals distributor Reliance Steel and Aluminium
Co. (BBB/Stable). Each of these distributors benefits from
significant size, scale and diversification compared with peers
within their markets. Fitch believes the fragmented nature of and
potential for continued outsourcing within chemicals distribution
provides Univar a unique opportunity to increase share and capture
potential market expansion.

Fitch views cash flow risk within the distribution industry as
relatively low, particularly compared with chemicals producers
given the limited commodity price risk, diversification of
customers and end-markets, low annual capex requirements (1%-2%
annually) and working capital benefits in a downcycle. While the
technology and metals distribution market risks differ, the overall
operating performances and cash flow resiliency are similar, with
FCF margins for these distribution peers averaging in the
low-to-mid single digits over the past five years.

Univar currently maintains a total debt to EBITDA of around 4.0x,
while the investment-grade rated peer distributors typically
operate total debt to EBITDA at or below 3.0x. Fitch expects
Univar's gross leverage to improve to sub-3.5x by 2021 assuming the
continued favorable integration of the Nexeo chemicals business and
a continued focus on de-leveraging. Fitch views this leverage
profile to be consistent with 'BB+' rating tolerances.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  - Organic revenue flat in 2020 yoy from continued volumetric
pressure and increases between 2%-3% on an annual basis thereafter
as higher priced chemicals are sold and volume increases from a
combination of cross-selling opportunities and further producer
outsourcing;

  - EBITDA margins increase yoy following Nexeo integration as
higher margin products are increasingly sold and cost cutting
efforts and synergies are realized;

  - Capex at roughly 1% of revenues annually;

  - No dividends or share repurchases over the next few years.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- Demonstrated progress in the integration of Nexeo and
realization of operational and cost synergies leading toward
continued margin improvement;

  -- Gross debt reduction leading to total debt-to-EBITDA below
3.5x or FFO-adjusted leverage less than 4.5x;

  -- Maintenance of strong liquidity and continued FCF generation;

  -- Demonstrated track record of adherence to capital allocation
priorities and financial policy targets.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- Inability to effectively integrate Nexeo and realize expected
operational and cost synergies;

  -- Total debt-to-EBITDA above 4.0x or FFO-adjusted leverage
greater than 5.0x;

  -- Sustained reduction in EBITDA margins below historical levels
of 6%-7% leading to weaker FCF generation and financial
flexibility.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Sufficient Liquidity: As of Sept. 30, 2019, Univar had over $134
million of cash and cash equivalents on its balance sheet and
approximately $731 million of availability under the combined ABL
facilities, after $140 million in outstanding letters of credit and
$322 million in borrowings. Fitch expects Univar to maintain
sufficient liquidity given the forecasted FCF profile.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of 3 - ESG issues are credit
neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either
due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by
the entity.


VIDANGEL INC: Trustee's $25K Sale of Application Papers Approved
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Kevin R. Anderson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Utah authorized George Hofmann, the Chapter 11 Trustee
of VidAngel, Inc., to enter into an agreement with Studio Brokerage
for the sale of copies of certain documents related to registration
of a crowdfunding "broker-dealer" with FINRA and the SEC for
$25,000.

The Agreement, and all of the terms and conditions thereof, is
approved.  The Trustee is authorized to consummate the sale
contemplated by the Agreement.

The 14-day stay provided under Fed. R. Bankr. Pro. 6004(h) is
waived, and the Trustee and the Buyer may consummate the
transaction contemplated in the Agreement immediately upon entry of
the Order.  

A copy of the Agreement is available at https://tinyurl.com/smvdyfx
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                        About VidAngel Inc.

Based in Provo, Utah, VidAngel, Inc., is an entertainment platform
empowering users to filter language, nudity, violence, and other
content from movies and TV shows on modern streaming devices such
as iOS, Android, and Roku.  The company's newly launched service
empowers users to filter via their Netflix, Amazon Prime, and HBO
on Amazon Prime accounts, as well as enjoy original content
produced by VidAngel Studios.  Its signature original series, Dry
Bar Comedy, now features the world's largest collection of clean
standup comedy, earning rave reviews from fans nationwide.

VidAngel filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Utah Case No.
17-29073) on Oct. 18, 2017.  In the petition signed by CEO Neal
Harmon, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.  

Judge Kevin R. Anderson oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped J. Thomas Beckett, Esq., at Parsons Behle &
Latimer, as bankruptcy counsel; Durham Jones & Pinegar, Baker
Marquart LLP, and Stris & Maher LLP as special counsel; and Tanner
LLC as auditor and advisor.  The Debtor also hired economic
consulting expert Analysis Group, Inc.


WC 56 EAST AVENUE: Seeks to Hire McAllister as Real Estate Broker
-----------------------------------------------------------------
WC 56 East Avenue, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Texas to hire McAllister &
Associates as its real estate broker.
   
McAllister will assist in the marketing and sale of its property --
a 1.12-acre parcel located in the Rainey Street District in
downtown Austin.

The firm will be paid a commission of 0.5% of the sale price.

McAllister is "disinterested" within the meaning of Section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Daniel Tristan
     McAllister & Associates
     201 Barton Springs Road,
     Austin, TX 78704
     Tel: 512-560-8314
     Fax: 512 472-2905
     Email: dani@matexas.com

                    About WC 56 East Avenue

WC 56 East Avenue, LLC, is a single asset real estate debtor, as
defined in Section 101(51B) of the Bankruptcy Code.  

WC 56 East Avenue sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Tex.
Case No. 19-11649) on Dec. 2, 2019, in Austin, Texas.  In the
petition signed by Brian Elliott, the Debtor's corporate counsel,
the Debtor was estimated to have between $10 million and $50
million in both assets and liabilities.  Judge Tony M. Davis is
assigned to the case.  The Debtor tapped Waller Lansden Dortch &
Davis, LLP as its legal counsel, and its Lain, Faulkner & Co., P.C.
as its accountant.


WD-I ASSOCIATES: $1.9M Sale of Parcel E to Drayton-Parker Approved
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge John E. Waites of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of South Carolina authorized WD-I Associates, LLC's sale of a
parcel of real property in Hilton Head, South Carolina ("Parcel
E"), Parcel Identification Number of R511-008-000-0248-0000,
together with the leases and the business operated thereon
("Shopping Center"), to Drayton-Parker Companies, LLC for
$1,875,000, subject to higher and better offers.

At the closing on the sale of the Real Property to the Bank of
Arkansas, the Debtor is authorized to assign the Parcel E Sale
Agreement to the Bank of Arkansas.  

Upon closing, Parcel E will be transferred to Parker, outside of
the ordinary course of business, free and clear of all liens,
claims and encumbrances, including, without limitation, the liens
of Bank of Arkansas and the liens of the Subordinated Lenders,
which liens will attach to the proceeds of the sale to the same
extent, order and priority that they existed against Parcel E.
Nothing in the Order will cause Parcel E to be conveyed to Parker
free of declarant or other development obligations relating to
Parcel E.

The 10-day stay imposed by Bankruptcy Rules 6004(g) and 6006(d) is
waived.

                    About WD-I Associates

WD-I Associates, LLC is a Single Asset Real Estate Debtor (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  The company is the fee
simple owner of land and improvements known as Sea Turtle
Marketplace, which has an appraised value of $20.5 million.  The
property is located at 430 William Hilton Parkway, Hilton Head
Island, S.C.

WD-I Associates sought protection for relief under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 19-02517) on May
7, 2019. In the petition signed by Jon Wheeler, manager of WD-I
Management, LLC, the Debtor disclosed $22,809,092 in assets and
$33,582,202 in total liabilities.

Judge John E. Waites presides over the case.

Kevin Campbell, Esq., at Campbell Law Firm, P.A., is the Debtor's
counsel.        



WD-I ASSOCIATES: $18.75M Sale of All Assets to BOKF Approved
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge John E. Waites of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of South Carolina authorized WD-I Associates, LLC's sale of
substantially all assets to BOKF, N.A. or its designee for $18.75
million.

Simultaneously with the closing, the Debtor is authorized (i) to
assume the Leases and assign them to Bank of Arkansas, and (ii) to
assign the Parcel E Sale Agreement to Bank of Arkansas.

Upon closing, the Shopping Center will be transferred to Bank of
Arkansas, outside of the ordinary course of business, free and
clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances, including, without
limitation, the liens of Bank of Arkansas and the liens of the
Subordinated
Lenders.  

The cash proceeds from the sale will be distributed in accordance
with the following;

     a. The Debtor and Bank of Arkansas will be bound by all of the
provisions of the Lender Purchase Agreement;  

     b. Upon closing, the cash proceeds from the sale will be
distributed as follows:

          (1) To taxing authorities with statutory liens against
the Property, in the amount of the statutory lien;

          (2) Commission to Brokers – 2% of the sale price
totaling $375,000;

          (3) U.S. Quarterly Fees - The administrative claim for
the US Trustee fees will be calculated and paid solely upon the
basis of actual distributions payable from the bankruptcy estate,
and the non-cash portion of the Credit Bid will not be deemed as
such distribution;

          (4) Set aside for Administrative Claimants and Trustee's
Fees - $100,000 of the sale proceeds will be set aside, in the
Debtor's operating DIP account, to fund any potential
administrative claims and Trustee's Fees , which amount will be
available to pay allowed administrative claims asserted through the
date of the Closing on the sale in addition to Trustee's Fees and
allowed professional fees associated with the sale, closing and
closure of the Chapter 11.  The funds remaining in the Debtor's
operating DIP account, after payment of allowed administrative
expense claims and the payment of the $200,000 carve out for
non-priority, general unsecured claims as set forth, will continue
to be subject to the lien of Bank of Arkansas and will be remitted
to Bank of Arkansas until its claim is paid in full;

     (5) Unsecured Creditors - $200,000 of the sale proceeds will
be paid into a segregated account established by the Debtor and
will be used solely to pay allowed non-priority, general unsecured
claims, including but not limited to any unsecured portion of the
secured claims filed by the Subordinated Lenders, and will be used
to satisfy allowed non-priority, general unsecured claims
regardless of how the Debtor's bankruptcy case is ultimately
resolved whether pursuant to a confirmed chapter 11 plan, dismissal
or otherwise.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, no deficiency claim
of Bank of Arkansas will be paid from the $200,000.  This provision
will be binding on any trustee appointed in the Bankruptcy Case.

The 14-day stay imposed by Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d) is
waived.

                     About WD-I Associates

WD-I Associates, LLC is a Single Asset Real Estate Debtor (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  The company is the fee
simple owner of land and improvements known as Sea Turtle
Marketplace, which has an appraised value of $20.5 million.  The
property is located at 430 William Hilton Parkway, Hilton Head
Island, S.C.

WD-I Associates sought protection for relief under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 19-02517) on May
7, 2019. In the petition signed by Jon Wheeler, manager of WD-I
Management, LLC, the Debtor disclosed $22,809,092 in assets and
$33,582,202 in total liabilities.

Judge John E. Waites is the presiding judge.

Kevin Campbell, Esq., at Campbell Law Firm, P.A., is the Debtor's
counsel.        


WESTERN RESERVE: U.S. Trustee Objects to Disclosure Statement
-------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew R. Vara, the United States Trustee for Region 9, submitted
an bjection to the Disclosure Statement explaining the Plan filed
by debtor Western Reserve Water Systems, Inc.

The U.S. Trustee points out that:

  * In the Disclosure Statement, the Debtor references the Classes
and classification of creditors. However, the Debtor does not set
forth the dollar amount of claims in each designated class. The
Disclosure Statement should be amended to set forth the dollar
amount comprising each Class of Claims.  If the Debtor is uncertain
as to the exact amount, then the Debtor should provide an estimate
of the dollar amount of each Class.

  * The Debtor should provide further detail in the Disclosure
Statement which includes the Debtor's gross and net revenues earned
since filing for bankruptcy.  The Debtor omits any reference in the
Disclosure Statement regarding its pending eviction from its
premises, plans to relocate, and motion to enter into a new lease.
This information should be provided along with the estimated costs
associated with its move.

  * Since the Plan partially depends upon new funds from existing
shareholders, the Debtor should provide documentation
substantiating the existing shareholders ability to purchase zero
coupon bonds and new shares.  The Disclosure Statement should also
be supplemented explaining how "new investors" will be solicited if
new shares are not sold to existing shareholders.

  * The Disclosure Statement does not set forth the amount of cash
that will be required on the effective date of the Plan.  This
information should be provided. The Disclosure Statement provides
that unsecured creditors, Class Five claims, will be paid 25% over
six years.  However, it does not set forth the date(s)
distributions will be made to unsecured creditors.  This
information should be provided.

  * The Disclosure Statement should include a liquidation analysis
reflecting the Debtor's assets, estimated liquidation value and
funds that would be available to creditors upon liquidation in
chapter 7. Any liquidation analysis should also set forth the basis
for any valuation of the Debtor’s assets.

A full-text copy of U.S. Trustee's objection to disclosure dated
January 23, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/vmkg7c2 from
PacerMonitor at no charge.

             About Western Reserve Water Systems

Western Reserve Water Systems, Inc. --
http://www.westernreservewater.com/-- is an industrial water
service company offering a wide range of equipment, services,
parts, and consulting services for the industrial process water and
high purity water user.  Western Reserve Water Systems services are
supplied to various industries, such as power generation, chemical
processing, auto, steel, food & beverage, pharmaceutical, hospital,
medical, laboratory and light industrial and commercial markets.
The Company's service center and regeneration facility is currently
located in Cleveland, Ohio, with satellite service locations in
Cincinnati, Ohio, and Terre Haute, Indiana.

Western Reserve Water Systems sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
N.D. Ohio Case No. 19-11864) on April 1, 2019.  In the petition
signed by Michael Eiermann, president, the Debtor disclosed total
assets at $10,285,282 and $4,306,486 in total debt.  The case is
assigned to Judge Jessica E. Price Smith.  The Debtor tapped Glenn
E. Forbes, Esq., at Forbes Law, LLC, as counsel.


WHEATON MEDICAL: Unsec. Creditors to Get Full Payment in 5 Years
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Wheaton Medical, S.C., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, a Plan of
Reorganization and a Disclosure Statement.

General unsecured creditors will receive payment of 100% of their
claims over 60 months, on a quarterly basis, beginning on May 1,
2020.

The Debtor's Plan is premised upon the sale of the Debtor's
locations, which are owned by Stella's Real Estate, a related
entity owned by Stella Zaimi (Jeff's ex-wife) as subject to
mortgages, promissory notes and security agreements in favor of The
Huntington Bank.  The Bank has commenced action to both foreclose
upon the Debtor's Locations and to evict the Debtor.

The Debtor's Plan is premised upon the Debtor's operations as well.
The Debtor believes it has a mechanism for increasing its revenue
in order to pay all creditors 100% of their claims, whether secured
or unsecured. All creditors will receive 100% payment of their
claims over a sixty (60) month period, with secured creditors
receiving 5% interest.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated January 23,
2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/qvzbf45 from PacerMonitor
at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

       Scott R. Clar
       Crane, Simon, Clar & Dan
       135 S. LaSalle, #3705
       Chicago, IL 60603
       Tel: (312) 641-6777

                     About Wheaton Medical

Wheaton Medical, S.C., is a medical group offering non-surgical,
non-invasive treatment for chronic and severe back pain.

Wheaton Medical sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 19-17922) on June 24,
2019. At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of between $1 million
and $10 million. The case is assigned to Judge Donald R. Cassling.
Lynch Law Offices, P.C., is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


[*] Bryan Kotliar Joins Katten's Bankruptcy Practice in New York
----------------------------------------------------------------
Katten on Feb. 3, 2020, disclosed that Bryan Kotliar has joined its
Insolvency and Restructuring practice as a partner in the New York
office.  Mr. Kotliar has represented debtors, creditors,
shareholders and other parties in interest in a range of
high-profile restructuring matters, including some of the largest
and most heavily contested bankruptcies of the past decade, as well
as prepackaged and other prearranged cases.

"Bryan is a super fit for our team because he has deep experience
in restructuring that enables him to find creative solutions to
today's most complicated distressed situations," said Steven
Reisman, head of Katten's Insolvency and Restructuring practice in
New York and widely viewed as one of the country's top bankruptcy
attorneys.  Mr. Reisman added, "Bryan brings tremendous value to
our team and, most importantly, our clients. We are thrilled to
have him."

Mr. Kotliar helps clients maximize value in a wide range of
distressed situations.  He has substantial experience representing
debtors, creditors, equity holders, foreign representatives, asset
purchasers and others in connection with in- and out-of-court
restructurings and similar bankruptcy matters.

An active member of the American Bankruptcy Institute, Kotliar most
recently was with Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and
before that, Jones Day, in the New York offices of both firms.
Earlier, he was at Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP, where
he first worked with Mr. Reisman.

Mr. Kotliar adds to Katten's deep bench of professionals with
extensive experience handling distressed matters.

Mr. Kotliar can be reached at:

    BRYAN M. KOTLIAR
    Partner
    Insolvency and Restructuring
    KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
    New York Office
    Tel: (212) 940-8546
    E-mail: bryan.kotliar@katten.com

Katten -- http://www.katten.com-- is a full-service law firm with
nearly 700 attorneys in locations across the United States and in
London and Shanghai. Clients seeking sophisticated, high-value
legal services turn to Katten for counsel locally, nationally and
internationally.  The firm's core areas of practice include
commercial finance, corporate, financial markets and funds,
insolvency and restructuring, intellectual property, litigation,
real estate, structured finance and securitization, transactional
tax planning, and trusts and estates.  Katten represents public and
private companies in numerous industries, as well as a number of
government and nonprofit organizations and individuals.


[^] BOOK REVIEW: BOARD GAMES - Changing Shape of Corporate Power
----------------------------------------------------------------
Authors:    Arthur Fleischer, Jr.,
            Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr., and
            Miriam Z. Klipper
Publisher:  Beard Books
Softcover:  248 pages
List Price: $34.95

Order your personal copy today at
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1587981629/internetbankrupt


A ruling by the Delaware Supreme Court on January 29, 1985 was a
wake-up call to directors of U. S. corporations. On this date,
overruling a lower court decision, the Delaware Supreme Court ruled
that the nine board members of Chicago company Trans Union
Corporation were "guilty of breaching their duty to the company's
shareholders." What the board members had done was agree to sell
Trans Union without a satisfactory review of its value. The guilty
board members were ordered by the Court to pay "the difference
between the per share selling price and the 'real' market value of
the company's shares."

Needless to say, the nine Trans Union directors were shocked at the
guilt verdict and the punishment. The chairman of the board, Jerome
Van Gorkom, was a lawyer and a CPA who was also a board member of
other large, respected corporations. For the most part, it was he
who had put together the terms of the potential sale, including
setting value of the company's stock at $55.00 even though it was
trading at about $38.00 per share. News of the possible sale
immediately drove the stock up to $51.50 per share, and was
commented on favorably in a "New York Times" business article.
Still, Van Gorkom and the other directors were found guilty of
breaching their duty, and ordered by Delaware's highest court to
pay a sum to injured parties that would be financially ruinous.
This was clearly more than board members of the Trans Union
Corporation or any other corporation had ever bargained for. It was
more than board members had ever conceived was possible without
evidence of fraud or graft.

The three authors are all attorneys who have worked at the highest
levels of the legal field, business, and government. Fleischer is
the senior partner of the law firm Fried, Frank, Harris, Schriver &
Jacobson at the head of its mergers and acquisitions department.
He's also the author of the textbook "Takeover Defenses" which is
in its 6th edition. Hazard is a Professor of Law and former
reporter for the American Bar Association's special committee on
the lawyers' ethics code; while Klipper has been a New York
assistant district attorney prosecuting corporate and financial
fraud, and also a corporate attorney on Wall Street. Using the
Trans Union Corporation case as a watershed event for members of
boards of directors, the highly-experienced legal professionals lay
out the new ground rules for board members. In laying out the
circumstances and facts of a number of cases; keen, concise
analyses of these; and finding where and how board members went
wrong, the authors provide guidance for corporate directors, top
executives, and corporate and private business attorneys on issues,
processes, and decisions of critical importance to them.

Household International, Union Carbide, Gelco Corp., Revlon, SCM,
and Freuhauf are other major corporations whose
merger-and-acquisitions activities resulted in court cases that the
authors study to the benefit of readers. The Boards of Directors of
these as well as Trans Union and their positions with other
companies are listed in the appendix. Many other corporations and
their board members are also referred to in the text.

With respect to each of the cases it deals with, BOARD GAMES
outlines the business environment, identifies important
individuals, analyzes decisions, and discusses considerations
regarding laws, government regulations, and corporate practice. In
all of this, however, given the exceptional legal background of the
three authors, the book recurringly brings into the picture the
legalities applying to the activities and decisions of board
members and in many instances, court rulings on these. Passages
from court transcripts are occasionally recorded and commented on.
Elsewhere, legal terms and concepts -- e. g., "gross nonattendance"
-- are defined as much as they can be. In one place, the authors
discuss six levels of responsibility for board members from "assure
proper result" through negligence up to fraud. Without being overly
technical, the authors' legal experience and guidance is
continually in the forefront. Needless to say, with this, BOARD
GAMES is a work of importance to board members and others with the
responsibility of overseeing and running corporations in the
present-day, post-Enron business environment where shareholders and
government officials are scrutinizing their behavior and
decisions.



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2020.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***