/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/220814.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Sunday, August 14, 2022, Vol. 26, No. 225

                            Headlines

ACCESS GROUP 2002-1: Fitch Affirms 'CC' Rating on Class B Notes
ACREC 2021-FL1: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on Class G Notes
AMERICAN CREDIT 2022-3: DBRS Gives Prov. B Rating on Class F Notes
AMSR 2022-SFR3: DBRS Gives Prov. BB(low) Rating on Class F Certs
APIDOS CLO XLI: Moody's Assigns (P)B3 Rating to Class F Notes

APIDOS CLO XXVII: Moody's Ups Rating on $7.5MM Class E Notes to B2
ARBOR REALTY 2019-FL2: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on Cl. G Notes
BANK 202-BNK43: Fitch Gives B-(EXP) Rating to Class G Certs
BARINGS CLO 2022-II: Fitch Assigns BB Rating on Class E Debt
BBCMS 2017-DELC: DBRS Confirms B Rating on Class HRR Certs

BBCMS MORTGAGE 2019-C4: Fitch Affirms 'B-sf' Rating on 2 Tranches
BENCHMARK 2022-B36: DBRS Gives Prov. B Rating on Class X-J Notes
BENCHMARK 2022: Fitch Affirms B-sf Rating on 2 Tranches
BLACKROCK DLF IX 2020-1: DBRS Finalizes B Rating on Class W Notes
BX TRUST 2022-PSB: Fitch to Rate Class HRR Debt 'B-sf'

BXHPP TRUST 2021-FILM: DBRS Confirms BB Rating on Class E Certs
CHC COMMERCIAL 2019-CHC: DBRS Confirms BB Rating on Class E Certs
COLT 2022-7: Fitch Assigns Bsf Rating to Class B2 Certs
COMM 2012-LTRT: DBRS Confirms CCC Rating on Class E Certs
COMM TRUST 2020-CBM: DBRS Confirms BB(low) Rating on Class F Certs

CPS AUTO 2022-C: DBRS Gives Prov. BB Rating on Class E Notes
EXETER AUTOMOBILE 2022-4: DBRS Gives Prov. BB Rating on E Notes
EXETER AUTOMOBILE 2022-4: S&P Assigns BB (sf) Rating on E Notes
FANNIE MAE 2022-R08: S&P Assigns BB- (sf) Rating on Cl. 1B-1 Notes
FLAGSHIP CREDIT 2022-3: S&P Assigns Prelim 'BB-' Rating on E Notes

FREDDIE MAC 2022-HQA2: DBRS Finalizes BB Rating on 16 Classes
FREDDIE MAC 2022-HQA3: DBRS Gives Prov. BB Rating on 16 Classes
FS RIALTO 2022-FL6: DBRS Gives Prov. B(low) Rating on Cl. G Notes
GOODLEAP SUSTAINABLE 2022-3: S&P Assigns BB (sf) Rating on C Notes
GRACIE POINT 2022-2: DBRS Finalizes BB Rating on Class E Notes

GREEN TREE 1996-8: S&P Raises Class M-1 Notes Rating to B- (sf)
GS MORTGAGE 2013-G1: DBRS Confirms BB Rating on Class DM Certs
GS MORTGAGE 2018-GS10: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on G-RR Certs
GS MORTGAGE 2019-GC42: Fitch Affirms B- Rating on Cl. G-RR Certs
GS MORTGAGE 2022-LTV2: DBRS Gives Prov. BB Rating on B4 Certs

GS MORTGAGE 2022-LTV2: Moody's Gives (P)B3 Rating to Cl. B-5 Debt
GS MORTGAGE 2022-RPL3: DBRS Gives B Rating on Class B-2 Notes
GS MORTGAGE 2022-RPL3: Fitch Assigns Bsf Rating on Class B-2 Debt
HAWAII HOTEL 2019-MAUI: DBRS Hikes Class G Certs Rating to B
HOMEWARD 2022-1: DBRS Gives Prov. B(low) Rating on Class B-2 Certs

JP MORGAN 2022-8: Fitch Gives Final B-sf Ratings on Class B5 Debt
MADISON PARK LV: Moody's Assigns (P)B3 Rating to $500K Cl. F Notes
MADISON PARK LV: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to $500,000 Cl. F Notes
MF1 2022-FL10 LLC: DBRS Finalizes B(low) Rating on 3 Classes Notes
MFA 2022-INV2: DBRS Finalizes B Rating on Class B-2 Certs

MORGAN STANLEY 2013-C11: Moody's Cuts Cl. A-S Certs Rating to Ba2
MORGAN STANLEY 2022-17A: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to $1MM F Notes
MOSAIC SOLAR 2022-2: Fitch Gives BB(EXP) Rating on Class D Notes
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE 2007-4: S&P Affirms 'CC' Rating on A-3-L Notes
NCF GRANTOR 2005-3: S&P Affirms BB+ (sf) Rating on Cl. A-5-2 Notes

NEW RESIDENTIAL 2022-SFR2: DBRS Gives Prov. BB Rating on F Certs
OBX TRUST 2022-J2: Moody's Assigns B2 Rating to Cl. B-5 Notes
OHA CREDIT 12: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to $1MM Class F Notes
PALMER SQUARE 2022-3: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to $1MM F Notes
PFP 2019-6: DBRS Hikes Class G Notes Rating to B(high)

PFP 2021-8: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on Class G Notes
RFM REREMIC 2022-FRR1: DBRS Gives Prov. B(low) Rating on 3 Classes
RR 22 LTD: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to $700,000 Class E Notes
SPSS 2021-A LLC: DBRS Confirms BB Rating on Class D Securities
STACR 2020-HQA5: Moody's Ups Rating on Cl. B-1 Bonds to Ba1

STACR 2022-HQA3: Moody's Gives (P)Ba3 Rating to 10 Tranches
TIKEHAU US II: Moody's Assigns Ba3 Rating to $13.8MM Class E Notes
TOWD POINT 2022-1: DBRS Finalizes B(high) Rating on Class B2 Notes
TOWD POINT 2022-2: DBRS Gives Prov. BB Rating on Class B1 Notes
UBSCM 2018-NYCH: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on Class G Certs

UPSTART SECURITIZATION 2022-4: Moody's Gives '(P)Ba2' to B Notes
VELOCITY COMMERCIAL 2022-4: DBRS Gives Prov. B Rating on 3 Classes
WACHOVIA BANK 2007-C33: S&P Discontinues 'D' Rating on A-J Certs
WELLS FARGO 2015-LC22: DBRS Confirms B Rating on Class F Certs
WELLS FARGO 2016-C36: DBRS Confirms CCC Rating on Class EFG Certs

[*] DBRS Confirms 11 Ratings From 6 Affirm Asset Trust Deals
[*] DBRS Reviews 57 Classes from 8 US RMBS Transactions
[*] DBRS Reviews 72 Classes from 8 U.S. RMBS Transactions

                            *********

ACCESS GROUP 2002-1: Fitch Affirms 'CC' Rating on Class B Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch has upgraded the class A ratings of Access Group 2002
Indenture of Trust, and has affirmed the ratings of class B. The
Rating Outlooks for all class A notes remain Stable.

RATING ACTIONS

ENTITY/DEBT               RATING                        PRIOR
   ----                   ------                        -----
Access Group, Inc.
- Federal Student
Loan Notes, Series 2003-1

  A-3 00432CAZ4           LT  AAsf   Upgrade            Asf

  A-4 00432CBA8           LT  AAsf   Upgrade            Asf

  A-5 00432CBB6           LT  AAsf   Upgrade            Asf

  A-6 00432CBC4           LT  AAsf   Upgrade            Asf

  B 00432CBE0             LT  CCsf   Affirmed           CCsf

Access Group, Inc.
- Federal Student
Loan Notes, Series 2002-1
  
  A-3 00432CAM3           LT  AAsf   Upgrade            Asf

  A-4 00432CAN1           LT  AAsf   Upgrade            Asf

  B 00432CAP6             LT  CCsf   Affirmed           CCsf

Access Group, Inc.
- Federal Student
Loan Notes, Series 2004-1
  
  A-2 00432CBN0           LT  AAsf   Upgrade            Asf

  A-4 00432CBQ3           LT  AAsf   Upgrade            Asf

  A-5 00432CBR1           LT  AAsf   Upgrade            Asf

  B 00432CBT7             LT  CCsf   Affirmed           CCsf

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

The class A ratings have been upgraded to 'AAsf' from 'Asf' due to
increasing credit enhancement, which was 8.3% for the most recent
distribution period compared to 6.8% one year prior.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

U.S. Sovereign Risk: The trust collateral comprises Federal Family
Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans, with guaranties provided by
eligible guarantors and reinsurance provided by the U.S. Department
of Education (ED) for at least 97% of principal and accrued
interest. The U.S. sovereign rating is currently 'AAA'/Stable.

Collateral Performance: Based on transaction specific performance
to date, Fitch maintained its sustainable constant default rate
assumption (sCDR) of 1.7% and sustainable constant prepayment rate
(sCPR) of 4.25%. The base case and 'AAsf default rate is 10.25% and
28.2%, respectively. The TTM levels of deferment and forbearance
are approximately 0.54% and 2.4%, respectively. These levels are
used as the starting point in cash flow modeling and subsequent
declines and increases are modeled as per criteria.

Basis and Interest Rate Risk: Basis risk for this transaction
arises from any rate and reset frequency mismatch between interest
rate indices for SAP and the securities. As of the end of the June
30, 2021 collection period, all trust student loans are indexed to
either 91-day T-bill or one-month LIBOR. Approximately 10% of the
notes are indexed to 3ML and the remaining are auction rate
securities.

Payment Structure: Credit enhancement (CE) is provided by excess
spread, and the class A notes benefit from subordination provided
by the class B notes. Reported senior and total parity are
approximately 109.02% and 92.65% respectively. Liquidity support is
provided by a reserve account sized at approximately $2.9 million.
No cash is currently being released from the trust as the cash
release threshold of 101% total parity has not been met.

Operational Capabilities: Day-to-day servicing is provided by
Nelnet, Inc., which Fitch believes is an acceptable servicer of
student loans due to its long servicing history.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

'AAAsf' rated tranches of most FFELP securitizations will likely
move in tandem with the U.S. sovereign rating given the strong
linkage to the U.S. sovereign, and the nature of the reinsurance
provided by the Department of Education. Aside from the U.S.
sovereign rating, defaults, basis risk and loan extension risk
account for the majority of the risk embedded in FFELP student loan
transactions.

This section provides insight into the model-implied sensitivities
the transactions face when one assumption is modified, while
holding others equal. Fitch conducts credit and maturity stress
sensitivity analysis by increasing or decreasing key assumptions by
25% and 50% over the base case. The credit stress sensitivity is
viewed by stressing both the base case default rate and the basis
spread.

The maturity stress sensitivity is viewed by stressing remaining
term, IBR usage and prepayments. The results should only be
considered as one potential outcome, as the transaction is exposed
to multiple dynamic risk factors and should not be used as an
indicator of possible future performance.

Current Ratings: class A 'AAsf'; class B 'CCCsf

Credit Stress Rating Sensitivity

-- Default increase 25%: class A 'AAsf'; class B 'CCCsf'

-- Default increase 50%: class A 'AAsf'; class B 'CCCsf'

-- Basis Spread increase 0.25%: class A 'AAsf'; class B 'CCCsf'

-- Basis Spread increase 0.5%: class A 'AAsf'; class B 'CCCsf'

Maturity Stress Rating Sensitivity

-- CPR decrease 25%: class A 'AAsf'; class B 'CCCsf'

-- CPR decrease 50%: class A 'AAsf'; class B 'CCCsf'

-- IBR Usage increase 25%: class A 'AAsf'; class B 'CCCsf'

-- IBR Usage increase 50%: class A 'AAsf'; class B 'CCCsf'

-- Remaining Term increase 25%: class A 'CCCsf'; class B 'CCCsf'

-- Remaining Term increase 50%: class A 'CCCsf'; class B 'CCCsf'

Fitch has revised its global economic outlook forecasts as a result
of the war in Ukraine and related economic sanctions. Downside
risks have increased highlighted in the special report, "What a
Stagflation Scenario Would Mean for Global Structured Finance", an
assessment of the potential rating and asset performance impact of
a plausible, albeit worse than expected, adverse stagflation
scenario.

Fitch expects the FFELP student loan ABS sector, under this
scenario, to experience mild to modest asset performance
deterioration, indicating some Outlook changes (between 5% and 20%
of outstanding ratings). Asset performance under this adverse
scenario is expected to be more modest than the most severe
sensitivity scenario below. The severity and duration of the
macroeconomic disruption is uncertain, but is balanced by a strong
labor market and the build-up of household savings during the
pandemic, which will provide support in the near term to households
faced with falling real incomes.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

Credit Stress Rating Sensitivity

-- Default decrease 25%: class A 'AAAsf'; class B 'CCCsf'

-- Basis Spread decrease 0.25%: class A 'AAAsf'; class B 'CCCsf'

Maturity Stress Rating Sensitivity

-- CPR increase 25%: class A 'AAAsf'; class B 'CCCsf'

-- IBR Usage decrease 25%: class A 'AAAsf'; class B 'CCCsf'

-- Remaining Term decrease 25%: class A 'AAAsf'; class B 'CCCsf'



ACREC 2021-FL1: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on Class G Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. confirmed its ratings on all classes of commercial
mortgage-backed notes issued by ACREC 2021-FL1 Ltd. (the Issuer) as
follows:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class G at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating confirmations reflect the overall stable performance of
the transaction, which has remained in line with DBRS Morningstar's
expectations since issuance. In conjunction with this press
release, DBRS Morningstar has published a Surveillance Performance
Update report with in-depth analysis and credit metrics for the
transaction and with business plan updates on select loans.

The initial collateral consisted of 23 floating-rate mortgages
secured by 23 transitional multifamily properties with a cut-off
date balance totaling approximately $875.6 million, excluding
approximately $18.4 million of future funding commitments. Most
loans are in a period of transition with plans to stabilize
performance and improve the asset value.

The transaction is a managed vehicle, which includes an 18-month
reinvestment period expiring with the April 2023 Payment Date,
whereby the Issuer may acquire Funded Companion Participations and
new loan collateral into the trust subject to Eligibility Criteria
as defined at issuance. According to the Eligibility Criteria, all
collateral will be secured by multifamily assets. As of July 2022,
the Replenishment Account has a balance of $93.7 million.

According to the July 2022 remittance report, 20 loans remain in
the pool with a current principal balance of $782.0 million. Since
issuance, five loans with a former cumulative trust balance of
$172.5 million have successfully repaid from the pool, and two
loans with a current cumulative trust balance of $78.8 million have
been contributed to the trust.

In general, borrowers are progressing toward completion of their
stated business plans with many plans still in the early stages.
According to the collateral manager, cumulative loan future funding
of $2.1 million has been advanced across nine individual borrowers
through June 2022 to aid in business plan completion. An additional
$19.8 million of loan future funding allocated to 11 individual
borrowers remains outstanding.

The pool is concentrated by property type as all 20 loans,
representing 100.0% of the current trust balance, are secured by
traditional multifamily assets. Additionally, most loans in the
pool are secured by traditional multifamily properties, such as
garden-style communities or mid-rise/high-rise buildings, with no
independent-living/assisted-living/memory care facilities or
student housing properties included in this pool. Furthermore,
during the transaction's reinvestment period, only multifamily
properties (excluding senior housing and student housing
properties) are eligible to be brought into the trust.

The pool continues to be predominantly composed of properties in
suburban markets, defined as markets with a DBRS Morningstar Market
Rank of 3, 4, and 5. As of the July 2022 reporting, this includes
15 loans, representing 71.9% of the current trust balance. In
addition, there are no properties in tertiary markets, defined as
markets with a DBRS Morningstar Market Rank of 2. In comparison, at
issuance, 16 loans, representing 67.3% of the trust balance, were
secured by properties in suburban markets and two loans,
representing 7.6% of the trust balance, were secured by properties
in tertiary markets. The transaction is also concentrated by loan
size, as the 10 largest loans represent 66.8% of the pool. Overall
pool leverage has remained relatively consistent from issuance.
According to July 2022 reporting, the weighted-average (WA) as-is
appraised loan-to-value (LTV) ratio is 74.5% and the WA stabilized
appraised LTV is 69.8%. In comparison, these figures were 74.5% and
69.2%, respectively, at closing.

As of the July 2022 remittance, three loans, representing 12.1% of
the pool, are on the servicer's watchlist for cash flow concerns.
The largest of these, The Duncan (Prospectus ID#5, 6.6% of the
pool), is secured by a 260-unit multifamily property in Chicago's
West Loop submarket. While the loan reported a debt service
coverage ratio (DSCR) of 0.36 times (x) as of YE2021, the property
benefits from strong leasing momentum as it was 95.0% occupied as
of the July 2022 rent roll, an increase from 64.5% at issuance.
According to the servicer-provided financials for the trailing
12-month period ended April 30, 2022, property performance has
improved with a reported net cash flow of $1.9 million, equating to
a DSCR of 0.82x.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



AMERICAN CREDIT 2022-3: DBRS Gives Prov. B Rating on Class F Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following classes of
notes to be issued by American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust
2022-3 (ACAR 2022-3 or the Issuer):

-- $128,650,000 Class A Notes at AAA (sf)
-- $27,900,000 Class B Notes at AA (high) (sf)
-- $43,400,000 Class C Notes at A (sf)
-- $44,180,000 Class D Notes at BBB (sf)
-- $18,600,000 Class E Notes at BB (sf)
-- $17,820,000 Class F Notes at B (sf)

The provisional ratings are based on DBRS Morningstar's review of
the following analytical considerations:

(1) Transaction capital structure, proposed ratings, and form and
sufficiency of available credit enhancement.

-- Credit enhancement is in the form of overcollateralization
(OC), subordination, amounts held in the reserve fund, and excess
spread. Credit enhancement levels are sufficient to support the
DBRS Morningstar-projected cumulative net loss (CNL) assumption
under various stress scenarios.

-- The ability of the transaction to withstand stressed cash flow
assumptions and repay investors according to the terms on which
they have invested. For this transaction, the ratings address the
payment of timely interest on a monthly basis and principal by the
final scheduled distribution date.

(2) ACAR 2022-3 provides for the Class A, B, C, D, and E coverage
multiples being slightly below the DBRS Morningstar range of
multiples set forth in the "Rating U.S. Retail Auto Loan
Securitizations" methodology for this asset class. DBRS Morningstar
believes that this is warranted, given the magnitude of expected
loss and structural features of the transaction.

(3) The DBRS Morningstar CNL assumption is 25.35% based on the
expected cut-off date pool composition.

(4) The transaction assumptions consider DBRS Morningstar's
baseline macroeconomic scenarios for rated sovereign economies,
available in its commentary "Baseline Macroeconomic Scenarios For
Rated Sovereigns: June 2022 Update," published on June 29, 2022.
These baseline macroeconomic scenarios replace DBRS Morningstar's
moderate and adverse Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic
scenarios, which were first published in April 2020.

(5) The consistent operational history of American Credit
Acceptance, LLC (ACA or the Company) as well as the overall
strength of the Company and its management team.

-- The ACA senior management team has considerable experience,
with an approximate average of 18 years in banking, finance, and
auto finance companies as well as an average of approximately nine
years of Company tenure.

(6) ACA's operating history and its capabilities with regard to
originations, underwriting, and servicing.

-- DBRS Morningstar has performed an operational review of ACA and
considers the entity to be an acceptable originator and servicer of
subprime automobile loan contracts.

-- ACA has completed 39 securitizations since 2011, including four
transactions in 2021 and two in 2022.

-- ACA maintains a strong corporate culture of compliance and a
robust compliance department.

(7) The credit quality of the collateral and the consistent
performance of ACA's auto loan portfolio.

-- Availability of considerable historical performance data and a
history of consistent performance of the ACA portfolio.

-- The statistical pool characteristics include the following: the
pool is seasoned by approximately six months and contains ACA
originations from Q2 2013 through Q2 2022, the weighted-average
(WA) remaining term of the collateral pool is approximately 65
months, and the WA FICO score of the pool is 543.

(8) The Company indicated that it may be subject to various
consumer claims and litigation seeking damages and statutory
penalties. Some litigation against ACA could take the form of
class-action complaints by consumers; however, the Company
indicated that there is no material pending or threatened
litigation.

(9) The legal structure and presence of legal opinions that are
expected to address the true sale of the assets to the Issuer, the
nonconsolidation of each of the depositor and the Issuer with ACA,
that the Issuer has a valid first-priority security interest in the
assets, and the consistency with the DBRS Morningstar "Legal
Criteria for U.S. Structured Finance" methodology.

(10) ACAR 2022-3 provides for the Class F Notes with an assigned
rating of B (sf). While the DBRS Morningstar "Rating U.S. Retail
Auto Loan Securitizations" methodology does not set forth a range
of multiples for this asset class at the B (sf) level, the
analytical approach for this rating level is consistent with that
contemplated by the methodology. The typical range of multiples
applied in the DBRS Morningstar stress analysis for a B (sf) rating
is 1.00 times (x) to 1.25x.

ACA is an independent full-service automotive financing and
servicing company that provides (1) financing to borrowers who do
not typically have access to prime credit-lending terms for the
purchase of late-model vehicles and (2) refinancing of existing
automotive financing.

The ACAR 2022-3 transaction will represent the 40th securitization
completed by ACA since 2011 and will offer both senior and
subordinate rated securities. The receivables securitized in ACAR
2022-3 will be subprime automobile loan contracts secured primarily
by used automobiles, light-duty trucks, vans, motorcycles, and
minivans.

The rating on the Class A Notes reflects 59.50% of initial hard
credit enhancement provided by the subordinated notes in the pool,
the reserve fund (1.00% as a percentage of the initial collateral
balance), and OC (9.50% of the total pool balance). The ratings on
the Class B, C, D, E, and F Notes reflect 50.50%, 36.50%, 22.25%,
16.25%, and 10.50% of initial hard credit enhancement,
respectively. Additional credit support may be provided from excess
spread available in the structure.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



AMSR 2022-SFR3: DBRS Gives Prov. BB(low) Rating on Class F Certs
----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned the following provisional ratings to the
Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates to be issued by AMSR
2022-SFR3 Trust (AMSR 2022-SFR3):

-- $278.9 million Class A at AAA (sf)
-- $81.9 million Class B at AAA (sf)
-- $37.1 million Class C at AA (sf)
-- $48.8 million Class D at A (sf)
-- $48.8 million Class E-1 at BBB (high) (sf)
-- $39.0 million Class E-2 at BBB (low) (sf)
-- $64.4 million Class F at BB (low) (sf)

The AAA (sf) rating on the Class A Certificate reflects 57.4% of
credit enhancement provided by subordinated notes in the pool. The
AAA (sf), AA (sf), A (sf), BBB (high) (sf), BBB (low) (sf), and BB
(low) (sf) ratings reflect 44.9%, 39.3%, 31.9%, 24.4%, and 18.5%
credit enhancement, respectively.

Other than the classes specified above, DBRS Morningstar does not
rate any other classes in this transaction.

The AMSR 2022-SFR3 certificates are supported by the income streams
and values from 2,701 rental properties. The properties are
distributed across 15 states and 41 metropolitan statistical areas
(MSAs) in the United States. DBRS Morningstar maps an MSA based on
the ZIP code provided in the data tape, which may result in
different MSA stratifications than those provided in offering
documents. As measured by broker price opinion (BPO) value, 46.8%
of the portfolio is concentrated in three states: North Carolina
(19.4%), Florida (14.4%), and Texas (13.0%). The average value is
$288,849. The average age of the properties is roughly 35 years.
The majority of the properties have three or more bedrooms. The
certificates represent a beneficial ownership in an approximately
five-year, fixed-rate, interest-only (IO) loan with an initial
aggregate principal balance of approximately $655.4 million.

DBRS Morningstar assigned the provisional ratings to each class of
certificates by performing a quantitative and qualitative
collateral, structural, and legal analysis. This analysis uses DBRS
Morningstar's single-family rental subordination model and is based
on DBRS Morningstar's published criteria. DBRS Morningstar
developed property-level stresses for the analysis of single-family
rental assets. DBRS Morningstar assigned the provisional ratings to
each class based on the level of stresses each class can withstand
and whether such stresses are commensurate with the applicable
rating level. DBRS Morningstar's analysis includes estimated
base-case net cash flow (NCF) by evaluating the gross rent,
concession, vacancy, operating expenses, and capital expenditure
data. The DBRS Morningstar NCF analysis resulted in a minimum debt
service coverage ratio of higher than 1.0 times.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



APIDOS CLO XLI: Moody's Assigns (P)B3 Rating to Class F Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned provisional ratings to two
classes of notes to be issued by Apidos CLO XLI Ltd (the "Issuer"
or "Apidos XLI").

Moody's rating action is as follows:

US$307,500,000 Class A-1 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2034, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

US$500,000 Class F Mezzanine Deferrable Floating Rate Notes due
2034, Assigned (P)B3 (sf)

The notes listed are referred to herein, collectively, as the
"Rated Notes."

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on Moody's methodology and
considers all relevant risks, particularly those associated with
the CLO's portfolio and structure.

Apidos XLI is a managed cash flow CLO. The issued notes will be
collateralized primarily by broadly syndicated senior secured
corporate loans. At least 90.0% of the portfolio must consist of
senior secured loans, cash, and eligible investments, and up to
10.0% of the portfolio may consist of second lien loans, unsecured
loans, first lien last out loans and permitted non-loan assets.
Moody's expect the portfolio to be approximately 85% ramped as of
the closing date.

CVC Credit Partners, LLC (the "Manager") will direct the selection,
acquisition and disposition of the assets on behalf of the Issuer
and may engage in trading activity, including discretionary
trading, during the transaction's five-year reinvestment period.
Thereafter, subject to certain restrictions, the Manager may
reinvest unscheduled principal payments and proceeds from sales of
credit risk assets.

In addition to the Rated Notes, the Issuer will issue six other
classes of secured notes and one class of subordinated notes.

The transaction incorporates interest and par coverage tests which,
if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to pay down
the notes in order of seniority.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in Section 2.3.2.1
of the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan
Obligations" rating methodology published in December 2021.

For modeling purposes, Moody's used the following base-case
assumptions:

Par amount: $500,000,000

Diversity Score: 75

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2965

Weighted Average Spread (WAS): SOFR + 3.45%

Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 7.0%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 47.8%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 8.0 years

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2021.

Factors That Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the Rated Notes is subject to uncertainty. The
performance of the Rated Notes is sensitive to the performance of
the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. The Manager's investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
performance of the Rated Notes.


APIDOS CLO XXVII: Moody's Ups Rating on $7.5MM Class E Notes to B2
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. has upgraded the ratings on the
following notes issued by Apidos CLO XXVII:

US$57,500,000 Class A-2R Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2030 (the "Class A-2R Notes"), Upgraded to Aa1 (sf); previously on
June 15, 2021 Assigned Aa2 (sf)

US$28,750,000 Class B-R Mezzanine Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2030 (the "Class B-R Notes"), Upgraded to Aa3 (sf);
previously on June 15, 2021 Assigned A2 (sf)

US$31,250,000 Class C-R Mezzanine Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2030 (the "Class C-R Notes"), Upgraded to Baa1 (sf);
previously on June 15, 2021 Assigned Baa3 (sf)

US$22,500,000 Class D Mezzanine Deferrable Floating Rate Notes due
2030 (the "Class D Notes"), Upgraded to Ba2 (sf); previously on
July 27, 2017 Definitive Rating Assigned Ba3 (sf)

US$7,500,000 Class E Junior Deferrable Floating Rate Notes due 2030
(the "Class E Notes"), Upgraded to B2 (sf); previously on July 27,
2017 Definitive Rating Assigned B3 (sf)

Apidos CLO XXVII, originally issued in July 2017 and partially
refinanced in June 2021, is a managed cashflow CLO. The notes are
collateralized primarily by a portfolio of broadly syndicated
senior secured corporate loans. The transaction's reinvestment
period ended in July 2022.

RATINGS RATIONALE

These rating actions reflect primarily the benefit of the end of
the deal's reinvestment period in July 2022. In light of the
reinvestment restrictions during the amortization period which
limit the ability of the manager to effect significant changes to
the current collateral pool, Moody's analyzed the deal assuming a
higher likelihood that the collateral pool characteristics will be
maintained and continue to satisfy certain covenant requirements.
In particular, Moody's assumed that the deal will benefit from
lower weighted average rating factor (WARF) and higher spread
compared to the respective covenant levels.  Moody's modeled a
WARF of 2708 and weighted average spread (WAS) of 3.39% compared to
its current respective covenant levels of 2945, and 3.20%.

Additionally, the overcollateralization (OC) ratios of the rated
notes have improved since August 2021. Based on the trustee's July
2022 report [1], the OC ratios for the Class A/B, Class C, and
Class D notes are reported at 130.66%, 121.41%, 112.74% and
107.23%, respectively, versus August 2021 [2] levels of 129.65%,
120.47%, 111.87% and 106.39%, respectively.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations."

The key model inputs Moody's used in its analysis, such as par,
weighted average rating factor, diversity score, weighted average
spread, and weighted average recovery rate, are based on its
published methodology and could differ from the trustee's reported
numbers. For modeling purposes, Moody's used the following
base-case assumptions:

Performing par and principal proceeds balance: $492,898,458

Defaulted par: $751,300

Diversity Score: 87

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2708

Weighted Average Spread (WAS) (before accounting for reference rate
floors): 3.39%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 47.55%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 4.34 years

Methodology Used for the Rating Action

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2021.

Factors that Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the rated notes is subject to uncertainty. The
performance of the rated notes is sensitive to the performance of
the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change.


ARBOR REALTY 2019-FL2: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on Cl. G Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited confirmed the ratings on all classes of floating-rate
notes issued by Arbor Realty Commercial Real Estate Notes 2019-FL2,
Ltd. as follows:

-- Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes at AAA (sf)
-- Class B Secured Floating Rate Notes at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C Secured Floating Rate Notes at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D Secured Floating Rate Notes at BBB (high) (sf)
-- Class E Secured Floating Rate Notes at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F Floating Rate Notes at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class G Floating Rate Notes at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating confirmations reflect the overall stable performance of
the transaction, which has remained in line with DBRS Morningstar's
expectations. In conjunction with this press release, DBRS
Morningstar has published a Surveillance Performance Update rating
report with in-depth analysis and credit metrics for the
transaction and business plan updates on select loans.

The transaction is a managed collateralized loan obligation pool
with a maximum funded balance of $635.0 million. At issuance, the
pool initially consisted of 27 loans totalling $510.9 million,
which subsequently ramped up to the maximum balance. The
transaction has a 36-month reinvestment period that will expire
with the November 2022 Payment Date. Since issuance, 36 loans have
been repaid from the pool, including 18 loans with a former trust
balance of $318.1 million, which have been repaid since the
previous DBRS Morningstar rating action in October 2021. Since
October 2021, an additional 13 loans with a cumulative trust
balance of $192.4 million have been added to the transaction.

The current composition of the transaction is concentrated by
property type with 33 loans secured by multifamily properties
(81.2% of the pool), two loans secured by manufactured housing
communities (7.1% of the pool balance), and one loan secured by a
hotel property (5.8% of the pool balance). In contrast, the pool
consisted of 35 loans secured by multifamily properties (91.8% of
the pool balance) and two loans secured by manufactured housing
communities (6.4% of the pool balance) as of October 2021
reporting. The transaction continues to consist of loans secured by
properties concentrated in suburban markets with 27.8% of the pool
in DBRS Morningstar Market Rank 5, 19.7% of the pool in DBRS
Morningstar Market Rank 4, and 20.5% of the pool in DBRS
Morningstar Market Rank 3. Only three loans, representing 15.9% of
the pool, are secured by properties in markets that DBRS
Morningstar considers to be urban. Loan leverage on a poolwide
basis has remained relatively consistent from October 2021 as the
current weighted-average as-is appraised loan-to-value ratio (LTV)
is 82.7%, compared with 84.0% as of October 2021. The current
weighted-average stabilized appraised LTV is 68.7%, compared with
70.0% as of October 2021.

Through March 2022, the collateral manager had advanced $32.9
million in loan future funding to 25 individual borrowers to aid in
property stabilization efforts. The largest advance, $6.6 million,
was made to the borrower of the Park at Carlyle, which is by
629-unit multifamily property in Birmingham, Alabama. The
borrower's business plan is to complete a capital improvement
program for various interior and exterior renovations, with an
estimated $4,965 per unit of interior renovations for approximately
all units. An additional $41.1 million of loan future funding,
allocated to 34 borrowers, remains outstanding. Of this amount,
$2.9 million is allocated to the borrower of the Park at Carlyle
and $2.5 million is allocated to the borrower of the Reserve at
Perkins for further capital improvement costs.

Borrowers continue to progress toward completing the stated
business plans; however, several individual borrowers are behind
schedule on renovation plans but have achieved rental rates in line
with DBRS Morningstar's stabilized projections from issuance. There
are no loans on the servicer's watchlist; however, one loan, 930
North Boulevard (Prospectus ID#35, 1.7% of the pool), is in special
servicing as of the July 2022 remittance. The loan is secured by a
48-unit multifamily property in Oak Park, Illinois. The borrower's
business plan at issuance was focused on a $2.0 million
comprehensive renovation plan of the interior and exterior;
however, as of March 2022, the subject remains 100% vacant. It was
discovered the subject had structural issues, which forced all
residents to exit the property. The issues must be addressed before
the interior unit renovations can be completed. The noted workout
strategy from the servicer is for the loan to be repaid in full as
the borrower works to correct the structural issues and complete
its original business plan.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



BANK 202-BNK43: Fitch Gives B-(EXP) Rating to Class G Certs
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has issued a presale report on BANK 2022-BNK43,
commercial mortgage pass-through certificates, series 2022-BNK43.
Fitch has assigned the following expected ratings:

-- $16,160,000 class A-1 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $46,018,000 class A-2 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $3,443,000 class A-3 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $23,908,000 class A-SB 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $157,500,000a class A-4 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0b class A-4-1 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0bc class A-4-X1 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0b class A-4-2 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0bc class A-4-X2 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $477,654,000a class A-5 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0b class A-5-1 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0bc class A-5-X1 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0b class A-5-2 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0bc class A-5-X2 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $724,683,000c class X-A 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $195,406,000c class X-B 'A-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $100,938,000 class A-S 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0b class A-S-1 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0bc class A-S-X1 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0b class A-S-2 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0bc class A-S-X2 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $50,469,000 class B 'AA-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0b class B-1 'AA-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0bc class B-X1 'AA-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0b class B-2 'AA-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0bc class B-X2 'AA-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $43,999,000 class C 'A-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0b class C-1 'A-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0bc class C-X1 'A-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0b class C-2 'A-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $0bc class C-X2 'A-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $50,469,000cd class X-D 'BBB-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $28,470,000d class D 'BBBsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $21,999,000d class E 'BBB-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $20,705,000d class F 'BB-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $10,353,000d class G 'B-sf'; Outlook Stable.

Fitch is not expected to rate the following classes:

-- $33,646,246d class H;

-- $54,487,487e class RR Interest.

a. The initial certificate balances of classes A-4 and A-5 are not
yet known but are expected to be $635,154,000 in aggregate, subject
to a 5% variance. The certificate balances will be determined based
on the final pricing of those classes of certificates. The expected
class A-4 balance range is $0-$315,000,000, and the expected class
A-5 balance range is $320,154,000-$635,154,000. The balances of
classes A-4 and A-5 above represent the hypothetical balance for
class A-4 if class A-5 were sized at the midpoint of its range. In
the event that the class A-5 certificates are issued with an
initial certificate balance of $635,154,000, the class A-4
certificates will not be issued.

b. Exchangeable Certificates. Class A-4, A-5, A-S, B and C
certificates are exchangeable certificates. Each class of
exchangeable certificates may be exchanged for the corresponding
classes of exchangeable certificates and vice versa. The dollar
denomination of each of the received classes of certificates must
be equal to the dollar denomination of each of the corresponding
classes of exchangeable certificates. Class A-4 may be surrendered
(or received) for the received (or surrendered) classes A-4-1 and
A-4-X1. Class A-4 may be surrendered (or received) for the received
(or surrendered) classes A-4-2 and A-4-X2. Class A-5 may be
surrendered (or received) for the received (or surrendered) classes
A-5-1 and A-5-X1. Class A-5 may be surrendered (or received) for
the received (or surrendered) classes A-5-2 and A-5-X2. Class A-S
may be surrendered (or received) for the received (or surrendered)
classes A-S-1 and A-S-X1. Class A-S may be surrendered (or
received) for the received (or surrendered) classes A-S-2 and
A-S-X2. Class B may be surrendered (or received) for the received
(or surrendered) classes B-1 and B-X1. Class B may be surrendered
(or received) for the received (or surrendered) classes B-2 and
B-X2. Class C may be surrendered (or received) for the received (or
surrendered) classes C-1 and C-X1. Class C may be surrendered (or
received) for the received (or surrendered) classes C-2 and C-X2.

c. Notional amount and IO.

d. Privately placed and pursuant to Rule 144A.

e. Represents the "eligible vertical interest" comprising 5.0% of
the pool.

The expected ratings are based on information provided by the
issuer as of July 27, 2022.

Rating Action

BANK 2022-BNK43

  A-1               LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-2               LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-3               LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-4               LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-4-1             LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-4-2             LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-4-X1            LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-4-X2            LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-5               LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-5-1             LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-5-2             LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-5-X1            LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-5-X2            LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-S               LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-S-1             LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-S-2             LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-S-X1            LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-S-X2            LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  A-SB              LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  B                 LT  AA-(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  B-1               LT  AA-(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  B-2               LT  AA-(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  B-X1              LT  AA-(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  B-X2              LT  AA-(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  C                 LT  A-(EXP)sf    Expected Rating

  C-1               LT  A-(EXP)sf    Expected Rating

  C-2               LT  A-(EXP)sf    Expected Rating

  C-X1              LT  A-(EXP)sf    Expected Rating
  
  C-X2              LT  A-(EXP)sf    Expected Rating

  D                 LT  BBB(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  E                 LT  BBB-(EXP)sf  Expected Rating

  F                 LT  BB-(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  G                 LT  B-(EXP)sf    Expected Rating

  H                 LT  NR(EXP)sf    Expected Rating

  RR Interest       LT  NR(EXP)sf    Expected Rating

  X-A               LT  AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

  X-B               LT  A-(EXP)sf    Expected Rating

  X-D               LT  BBB-(EXP)sf  Expected Rating

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

The certificates represent the beneficial ownership interest in the
trust, the primary assets of which are 61 loans secured by 103
commercial properties with an aggregate principal balance of
$1,089,749,733 as of the cutoff date. The loans were contributed to
the trust by Bank of America, National Association, Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital
Holdings LLC and National Cooperative Bank, N.A. The master
servicers are expected to be Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
and National Cooperative Bank, N.A. The special servicers are
expected to be Greystone Servicing Company LLC and National
Cooperative Bank, N.A.

Fitch reviewed a comprehensive sample of the transaction's
collateral, including site inspections on 38.0% of the properties
by balance, cash flow analyses of 85.9% of the pool and asset
summary reviews on 100% of the pool.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Lower Fitch Leverage than Recent Transactions: This transaction's
leverage is lower than other multiborrower transactions recently
rated by Fitch. The pool's Fitch debt service coverage ratio (DSCR)
of 1.43x is higher than the 2022 YTD and 2021 averages of 1.34x and
1.38x, respectively. Additionally, the pool's Fitch loan-to-value
(LTV) ratio of 94.0% is lower with the 2022 YTD and the 2021
averages of 100.9% and 103.3%, respectively.

The pool's conduit-specific leverage is also lower than other
multiborrower transactions recently rated by Fitch. Excluding the
co-operative (co-op) and credit opinion loans, the pool's DSCR and
LTV are 1.30x and 98.5%, respectively. The 2022 YTD and 2021
averages, excluding credit opinion and co-op loans, are
1.24x/108.9% and 1.30x/110.5%, respectively.

Higher Pool Concentration: The pool's largest 10 loans represent
59.2% of its cutoff balance, which is greater than the 2022 YTD and
2021 averages of 55.5% and 51.2%, respectively. This results in a
Loan Concentration Index (LCI) score of 446 for the pool, which is
higher than the 2022 YTD and 2021 averages of 323 and 381,
respectively.

Investment-Grade Credit Opinion and Co-Op Loans: The pool includes
one loan, representing 7.7% of the pool by original principal
balance, which received an investment-grade credit opinion. This is
below the 2022 YTD average of 16.5% as well as the 2021 average of
13.3%. Constitution Center (7.71% of the pool) received a credit
opinion of 'A-sf' on a stand-alone basis. Additionally, the pool
contains a total of 15 loans, representing 4.0% of the cutoff
balance, that are secured by residential co-ops and exhibit
leverage characteristics significantly lower than typical conduit
loans. The weighted-average (WA) Fitch DSCR and LTV for the co-op
loans are 5.30x and 28.4%, respectively.

Limited Amortization: Based on the estimated loan balances at
maturity, the pool is scheduled to pay down only 4.2%, which is
above the 2022 YTD average of 3.4% and below the 2021 YTD average
of 4.8%. Thirty-five loans representing 70.5% of the pool are
full-term interest-only, and an additional five loans representing
6.0% of the pool are partial IO. The percentage of full-term IO
loans is slightly lower than the 2022 YTD and 2021 averages of
79.2% and 70.5%, respectively.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

Similarly, declining cash flow decreases property value and
capacity to meet its debt service obligations. The table below
indicates the model implied rating sensitivity to changes to the
same one variable, Fitch net cash flow (NCF):

-- Original Rating: 'AAAsf'/'AA-sf'/'A-sf'/'BBBsf'/'BBB-sf'/
    'BB- sf'/'B-sf';

-- 10% NCF Decline: 'A+sf'/'A-sf'/'BBB-sf'/'BB+sf'/'BB-sf'/
    'CCCsf'/'CCCsf';

-- 20% NCF Decline: 'A-sf'/'BBB sf'/'BB+sf'/'Bsf'/'CCCsf'/
    'CCCsf'/'CCCsf';

-- 30% NCF Decline: 'BBBsf'/'BB+sf'/'Bsf'/'CCCsf'/'CCCsf'/
    'CCCsf'/'CCCsf'.

Fitch has revised its global economic outlook forecasts as a result
of the war in Ukraine and related economic sanctions. Downside
risks have increased and, therefore, Fitch has published an
assessment of the potential rating and asset performance impact of
a plausible, albeit worse than expected, adverse stagflation
scenario on Fitch's major structured finance and covered bond
subsectors (What a Stagflation Scenario Would Mean for Global
Structured Finance).

Fitch expects the North American CMBS sector in the assumed adverse
scenario to experience virtually no impact on ratings performance,
indicating very few rating or Outlook changes. Fitch expects the
asset performance impact of the adverse case scenario to be more
modest than the most stressful scenario shown above, which assumes
a further 30% decline from Fitch's NCF at issuance.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

Improvement in cash flow increases property value and capacity to
meet its debt service obligations.

The list below indicates the model implied rating sensitivity to
changes in one variable, Fitch NCF:

-- Original Rating: 'AAAsf'/'AA-sf'/'A-sf'/'BBBsf'/'BBB-sf'/
    'BB-sf'/'B-sf';

-- 20% NCF Increase: 'AAAsf'/'AAAsf'/'AAsf'/'Asf'/'BBB-sf'/
    'BBB-sf'/'BBB-sf'.


BARINGS CLO 2022-II: Fitch Assigns BB Rating on Class E Debt
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned ratings and Rating Outlooks to Barings
CLO Ltd. 2022-II.

Barings CLO Ltd. 2022-II

A             LT AAAsf  New Rating
B-1           LT AAsf   New Rating
B-2           LT AAsf   New Rating
C             LT Asf    New Rating
D             LT BBB-sf New Rating
E             LT BB-sf  New Rating
Subordinated  LT NRsf   New Rating

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

Barings CLO Ltd. 2022-II (the issuer) is an arbitrage cash flow
collateralized loan obligation (CLO) that will be managed by
Barings LLC. Net proceeds from the issuance of the secured and
subordinated notes will provide financing on a portfolio of
approximately $400 million of primarily first lien senior secured
leveraged loans.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Asset Credit Quality (Negative): The average credit quality of the
indicative portfolio is 'B', which is in line with that of recent
CLOs. The weighted average rating factor (WARF) of the indicative
portfolio is 24.2 versus a maximum covenant, in accordance with the
initial expected matrix point of 24.3. Issuers rated in the 'B'
rating category denote a highly speculative credit quality.
However, the notes benefit from appropriate credit enhancement and
standard U.S. CLO structural features.

Asset Security (Positive): The indicative portfolio consists of
99.7% first-lien senior secured loans. The weighted average
recovery assumption (WARR) of the indicative portfolio is 76.52%
versus a minimum covenant interpolated from the Fitch Test Matrix
of 71.37%.

Portfolio Composition (Positive): The largest three industries may
comprise up to 39.0% of the portfolio balance in aggregate while
the top five obligors can represent up to 12.5% of the portfolio
balance in aggregate. The level of diversity required by industry,
obligor and geographic concentrations is in line with other recent
U.S. CLOs.

Portfolio Management (Neutral): The transaction has a 5.0-year
reinvestment period and reinvestment criteria similar to other U.S.
CLOs. Fitch's analysis was based on a stressed portfolio created by
adjusting the indicative portfolio to reflect permissible
concentration limits and collateral quality test levels.

Cash Flow Analysis (Positive): Fitch used a customized proprietary
cash flow model to replicate the principal and interest waterfalls
and assess the effectiveness of various structural features of the
transaction. In Fitch's stress scenarios at the initial expected
matrix point, the rated notes can withstand default and recovery
assumptions consistent with their assigned ratings. The performance
of all classes of rated notes at the other permitted matrix points
is in line with other recent CLOs.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

Variability in key model assumptions, such as decreases in recovery
rates and increases in default rates, could result in a downgrade.
Fitch evaluated the notes' sensitivity to potential changes in such
a metric. The results under these sensitivity scenarios are between
'BBB+sf' and 'AAAsf' for class A, between 'BB+sf' and 'AA+sf' for
class B, between 'B+sf' and 'A+sf' for class C, between less than
'B-sf' and 'BBB+sf' for class D, and between less than 'B-sf' and
'BB+sf' for class E.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

Upgrade scenarios are not applicable to the class A notes, as these
notes are in the highest rating category of 'AAAsf'. Variability in
key model assumptions, such as increases in recovery rates and
decreases in default rates, could result in an upgrade. Fitch
evaluated the notes' sensitivity to potential changes in such
metrics; results under these sensitivity scenarios are 'AAAsf' for
class B notes, between 'A+sf' and 'AA+sf' for class C notes, 'A+sf'
for class D notes, and 'BBB+sf' for class E notes.


BBCMS 2017-DELC: DBRS Confirms B Rating on Class HRR Certs
----------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited confirmed its ratings on all classes of Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-DELC issued by
BBCMS 2017-DELC Mortgage Trust as follows:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (high) (sf)
-- Class X-NCP at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (high) (sf)
-- Class D at A (low) (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class HRR at B (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating confirmations reflect the overall stable outlook for the
collateral as performance continues to recover from the impact of
the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and trend toward
pre-pandemic levels. This loan is secured by a 757-key,
full-service luxury beach resort on Coronado Island, California.
The transaction closed in August 2017, and the trust comprises
$507.6 million in senior mortgage debt with a total of $204.4
million held across three mezzanine loans held outside the trust.
The interest-only (IO) loan features a two-year initial term with
five one-year extensions. The servicer confirmed the borrower has
exercised its fourth extension option, which extended the maturity
date to August 2023.

The loan is sponsored by Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII L.P.,
an affiliate of The Blackstone Group Inc., the world's largest
alternative asset manager and real estate advisory firm. The hotel
previously operated as an independent hotel but is now managed by
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (Hilton) under the Curio Collection
flag, one of Hilton's upscale brands. The collateral benefits from
Hilton's global brand distribution system, the extensive network of
Hilton Honors members, and Hilton's marketing influence for group
bookings. The hotel management agreement with Hilton began in July
2017 and continues through July 2027 with two five-year extension
options.

The sponsor used the down time during the height of the pandemic to
complete the massive capex project of $400.0 million, which was
planned at issuance and is being delivered in various phases. It is
expected to be completed before the final loan maturity in August
2024. According to the property's website, completed projects
include new guest rooms in The Views, a newly restored front porch
and lobby, a new Ice House Museum, a gated beach community known as
Beach Village at The Del, and a new main entrance along the south
end of the resort. Other projects include the Shore House and
Southpointe Event Center, which will be opening in Fall 2022, as
well as the full guest room and common area renovation of The
Victorian, the property's main building, and Founders Hall meeting
room, which will be completed by 2023.

The loan reported a trailing 12-month (T-12) ended December 2021
net cash flow (NCF) of $49.5 million, compared with a year end (YE)
2020 NCF of $485,500, YE2019 NCF of $45.8 million, and DBRS
Morningstar NCF of $49.9 million at issuance. The loan reported
debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) for the same period at 2.30
times (x), compared with the YE2020, YE2019, and DBRS Morningstar
DSCR of 0.02x, 1.22x, and 1.63x, respectively.

According to the April 2022 STR report, the property reported a
T-12 ended April 2022 occupancy rate of 63.2%, average daily rate
(ADR) of $624.01, revenue per available room (RevPAR) of $394.21,
and a RevPAR penetration rate of 118.1%. This marks an improvement
from the T-12 ended May 2021 occupancy rate, ADR, and RevPAR of
32.5%, $528.04, and $171.87, respectively, and a RevPAR penetration
rate of 101.1%.

Notes: All figures are in U.S dollars unless otherwise noted.



BBCMS MORTGAGE 2019-C4: Fitch Affirms 'B-sf' Rating on 2 Tranches
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed all 18 classes of BBCMS Mortgage Trust
2019-C4 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2019-C4. In addition, Fitch has revised the Rating Outlooks on
classes F and X-F to Stable from Negative. The Rating Outlooks on
classes G and X-G remain Negative.

RATING ACTIONS

ENTITY/DEBT             RATING                        PRIOR
   ----                 ------                        -----
BBCMS 2019-C4

  A-1 07335CAA2         LT    AAAsf   Affirmed        AAAsf

  A-2 07335CAB0         LT    AAAsf   Affirmed        AAAsf

  A-3 07335CAC8         LT    AAAsf   Affirmed        AAAsf

  A-4 07335CAE4         LT    AAAsf   Affirmed        AAAsf

  A-5 07335CAF1         LT    AAAsf   Affirmed        AAAsf

  A-S 07335CAG9         LT    AAAsf   Affirmed        AAAsf

  A-SB 07335CAD6        LT    AAAsf   Affirmed        AAAsf

  B 07335CAH7           LT    AA-sf   Affirmed        AA-sf

  C 07335CAJ3           LT    A-sf    Affirmed        A-sf

  D 07335CAT1           LT    BBBsf   Affirmed        BBBsf

  E 07335CAV6           LT    BBB-sf  Affirmed        BBB-sf

  F 07335CAX2           LT    BB-sf   Affirmed        BB-sf

  G 07335CAZ7           LT    B-sf    Affirmed        B-sf

  X-A 07335CAK0         LT    AAAsf   Affirmed        AAAsf

  X-B 07335CAL8         LT    A-sf    Affirmed        A-sf

  X-D 07335CAM6         LT    BBB-sf  Affirmed        BBB-sf

  X-F 07335CAP9         LT    BB-sf   Affirmed        BB-sf

  X-G 07335CAR5         LT    B-sf    Affirmed        B-sf

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Improved Loss Expectations: The Outlook revisions to Stable on
classes F and X-F reflect improved loss expectations for the pool
since Fitch's prior rating due to performance stabilization of
properties that had been negatively affected by the pandemic. In
addition, three loans (3% of the pool) were defeased, including one
previously specially serviced loan, TZA Multifamily Portfolio #2
(1.5%). Another specially serviced loan, Pacific Grove Portfolio,
was prepaid with yield maintenance. Fitch's current ratings
incorporate a base case loss of 4.20%.

The Negative Outlook on classes G and X-G, which were previously
assigned for coronavirus-related stresses on hotel and retail
properties, is maintained due to higher losses on two loans in the
top 15, Emerald Pointe Apartments and Meidinger Tower, and
performance concerns on the specially serviced loans/assets;
downgrades are possible should performance of these properties not
stabilize or deteriorate further. Twelve loans (15.4%) have been
identified as Fitch Loan of Concern (FLOCs), including four
specially serviced loans (4.1%). As of the July 2022 remittance
reporting, six loans (6.1%) are in special servicing; two of these
loans (2%) are pending return to the master servicer.

The largest FLOC and largest increase in loss since the prior
rating action is the Emerald Pointe Apartments loan (2.7%), which
is secured by a 408-unit garden style apartment complex located in
Harvey, LA, approximately 8.5 miles south of Downtown New Orleans.
Occupancy at the subject has fallen to 41.2% as of YE 2021 from
95.8% in March 2021, largely due to 249 down units that sustained
wind damage from Hurricane Ida in late August 2021. The servicer
indicates that a loss draft reserve has been established and
repairs are in process. The servicer-reported YE 2021 NOI debt
service coverage ratio (DSCR) was 2.39x, compared with 2.45x at YE
2020. Fitch's base case loss expectation of 13% reflects an 8.75%
cap rate and a 30% stress to YE 2021 NOI due cash flow volatility
expected from the down units.

The second largest increase in loss since the prior rating action
is the Meidinger Tower loan (2.1%), which is secured by a 26-story
office building totaling 331,054-sf located in Louisville, KY.
Three tenants accounting for 43.6% of the NRA are considered
investment-grade or credit-worthy tenants, including the largest
tenant Computershare (33.9% NRA; lease expiry in October 2023).
Other major tenants include Mountjoy Chilton Medley, LLP (11.3%;
November 2022), Cotivity Healthcare (8.4%; lease expired July 2021)
and River Road Asset Management, LLC (6.0%; August 2022). The
property was 91.6% occupied in June 2021; an updated rent roll was
requested but not received. Fitch's base case loss of 15% reflects
a 10.25% cap rate and a 15% stress to the annualized June 2021 NOI
due to upcoming rollover concerns and limited leasing updates.

Specially Serviced Loans: The largest loan in special servicing is
the New Orleans MOB Portfolio, which is secured by a portfolio of
four office properties (three medical offices and one suburban
office) totaling 122,825-sf located in (two-Metairie,
one-Covington, one-New Orleans) Louisiana. The loan originally
transferred to the special servicer in August 2020 for monetary
default as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The borrower brought
the loan current and it returned to the master servicer in October
2020. The loan re-transferred to the special servicer in October
2021 for payment default, stemming from collection issues brought
by Hurricane Ida. The special servicer has begun dual tracking the
loan, which is currently 90 days delinquent. Fitch's loss
expectation reflects a stressed value of $141 psf, which is based
on a 30% stress to the most recent appraisal.

The largest contributors to expected losses are two REO hotel
assets (1.6%) located in El Reno, OK. Both loans transferred to
special servicing in March 2020 for imminent monetary default and
became REO in late 2020. Third-party property management is in
place and is working to increase RevPAR, ahead of a potential asset
sale in late 2023. Fitch's expected loss of approximately 50% for
both assets is based on a stress to the most recent appraisal
values; the resulting stressed value per key is approximately
$60,000.

Minimal Change in Credit Enhancement (CE): CE has had minimal
change since issuance due to limited amortization, one loan payoff
and three loan defeasances representing 3.0% of the pool. As of the
July 2022 remittance report, the pool's aggregate balance has been
paid down by 2.2% to $916.8 million from $937.3 million at
issuance. There are 24 loans (49.9% of the pool) that are full-term
interest-only (IO), 27 (21.0%) balloon loans and 21 (29.1%) loans
with a partial IO component.

Credit Opinion Loans: Four loans, representing 12.4% of the pool,
received investment-grade credit opinions at issuance. Three loans,
2 North 6th Place (2.2%), ILPT Hawaii Portfolio (2.1%) and 10000
Santa Monica Boulevard (1.1%), received stand-alone credit opinions
of BBBsf*. The pool's largest loan, Moffett Towers II - Buildings 3
& 4 (7.1%), received a stand-alone credit opinion of 'BBB-sf*'.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Downgrades to A-1 through B and IO class X-A are not likely
    due to the continued expected amortization, position in the
    capital structure and sufficient CE relative to loss
    expectations, but may occur should interest shortfalls affect
    these classes.

-- Downgrades to classes C, D, E, X-B and X-D may occur should
    expected losses for the pool increase substantially from
    continued underperformance of the FLOCs or higher loss
    expectations on the specially serviced loans.

-- Downgrades to classes F, G, X-F and X-G will occur with a
    greater certainty of loss or as losses are realized.

Fitch has identified both a baseline and a worse-than-expected,
adverse stagflation scenario based on fallout from the
Russia-Ukraine war whereby growth is sharply lower amid higher
inflation and interest rates; even if the adverse scenario should
play out, Fitch expects virtually no impact on ratings performance,
indicating very few rating or Outlook changes. However, for some
transactions with concentrations in underperforming retail
exposure, the ratings impact may be mild to modest, indicating some
changes on sub-investment grade notes.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

Factors that could lead to upgrades would include stable to
improved asset performance, coupled with additional paydown and/or
defeasance.

-- Upgrades to the 'A-sf' and 'AA-sf' rated classes would likely
    occur with significant improvement in CE and/or defeasance;  
    however, adverse selection and increased concentrations, or    

    further underperformance or default of the FLOCs could cause
    this trend to reverse.

-- Upgrades to the 'BBB-sf' and 'BBBsf' rated classes are
    considered unlikely and would be limited based on the
    sensitivity to concentrations or the potential for future
    concentrations. Classes would not be upgraded above 'Asf' if
    there is a likelihood of interest shortfalls.

-- Upgrades to the 'BB-sf' and 'B-sf' rated classes are not
    likely until the later years in the transaction and only if
    the performance of the remaining pool is stable and/or there
    is sufficient CE to the bonds.


BENCHMARK 2022-B36: DBRS Gives Prov. B Rating on Class X-J Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following classes of
notes to be issued by Benchmark 2022-B36 Mortgage Trust (BMARK
2022-B36):

-- Class A-1 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-2 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-4 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-5 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-SB at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class X-A at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (high) (sf)
-- Class X-B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (high) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (high) (sf)
-- Class X-D at BBB (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class X-F at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (high) (sf)
-- Class X-G at BB (high) (sf)
-- Class G at BB (sf)
-- Class X-H at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class H at B (high) (sf)
-- Class X-J at B (sf)
-- Class J at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

Classes X-D, X-F, X-G, X-H, X-J, X-K, D, E, F, G, H, J, and K will
be privately placed.

Classes X-A, X-B, X-D, X-F, X-G, X-H, and X-J are interest-only
(IO) certificates that reference a single rated tranche or multiple
rated tranches. The IO rating mirrors the lowest-rated applicable
reference obligation tranche adjusted upward by one notch if senior
in the waterfall.

The collateral consists of 31 fixed-rate loans secured by 69
commercial and multifamily properties with an aggregate cut-off
date balance of $753.8 million. One loan (Yorkshire & Lexington
Towers), representing 8.8% of the pool, is shadow-rated investment
grade by DBRS Morningstar. The conduit pool was analyzed to
determine the provisional ratings, reflecting the long-term
probability of loan default within the term and its liquidity at
maturity. When the cut-off balances were measured against the DBRS
Morningstar net cash flow and their respective actual constants,
the initial DBRS Morningstar weighted-average (WA) debt service
coverage ratio (DSCR) of the pool was 1.71 times (x). The WA DBRS
Morningstar Issuance loan-to-value ratio (LTV) of the pool was
52.7%, and the pool is scheduled to amortize to a WA DBRS
Morningstar Balloon LTV of 52.5% at maturity. These credit metrics
are based on the A-note balances. Excluding the shadow-rated loans,
the deal still exhibits a favorable WA DBRS Morningstar Issuance
LTV of 54.6% and WA DBRS Morningstar Balloon LTV of 54.4%. In
addition, the pool features only one loan, representing 1.1% of the
allocated pool balance, that exhibits a DBRS Morningstar Issuance
LTV in excess of 67.1%, a threshold generally indicative of
above-average default frequency. The transaction has a
sequential-pay pass-through structure.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



BENCHMARK 2022: Fitch Affirms B-sf Rating on 2 Tranches
-------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned expected ratings and Rating Outlooks to
Benchmark 2022-B36 Mortgage Trust commercial mortgage pass-through
certificates, series 2022-B36, as follows:

-- $1,000,000 class A-1 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $106,901,000 class A-2 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $87,500,000 class (a) A-4 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $303,640,000 (a) class A-5 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $2,240,000 class A-SB 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $64,450,000 class A-S 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $565,731,000 (b) class X-A 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $34,016,000 class B 'AA-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $30,435,000 class C 'A-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $64,451,000 (b) class X-B 'A-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $19,693,000 class D 'BBBsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $16,112,000 class E 'BBB-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $35,805,000 (b) class X-D 'BBB-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $8,952,000 class F 'BB+sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $8,952,000 (b) class X-F 'BB+sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $8,951,000 class G 'BB-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $8,951,000 (b) class X-G 'BB-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $7,161,000 class H 'B-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $7,161,000 (c) class X-H 'B-sf'; Outlook Stable.

The following classes are not expected to be rated by Fitch:

-- $11,602,000 class J;

-- $11,602,000 (b) class X-J;

-- $13,463,056 class K;

-- $13,463,056 (b) class X-K;

-- $29,839,694 (c) RR Interest;

-- $7,850,625 (c) class RR.

(a) The initial certificate balances of class A-4 and A-5 are not
yet known but are expected to be $391,140,000 in aggregate, subject
to a 5% variance. The certificate balances will be determined based
on the final pricing of those classes of certificates. The expected
class A-4 balance range is $0-$175,000,000, and the expected class
A-5 balance range is $216,140,000-$391,140,000. The balances for
classes A-4 and A-5 reflect the midpoints of each range.

(b) Notional amount and interest only (IO)

(c) Vertical risk retention interest.

The expected ratings are based on information provided by the
issuer as of August 1, 2022.

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

The certificates represent the beneficial ownership interest in the
trust, primary assets of which are 31 loans secured by 69
commercial properties having an aggregate principal balance of
$753,806,375 as of the cut-off date. The loans were contributed to
the trust by Citi Real Estate Funding Inc., German American Capital
Corporation, Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A. Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National
Association, is expected to serve as both the master and special
servicer.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Lower Leverage Compared to Recent Transactions: The pool has lower
leverage compared to recent multiborrower transactions rated by
Fitch Ratings. The pool's Fitch's loan-to-value ratio (LTV) of
97.2% is lower than both the 2022 YTD and 2021 averages of 100.9%
and 103.3%, respectively.

However, the pool's Fitch trust debt service coverage ratio (DSCR)
of 1.16x is below the 2022 YTD and 2021 averages of 1.34x and
1.38x, respectively. This is in large part because of the higher
weighted average mortgage rate. Excluding credit opinion loans, the
pool's Fitch LTV and DSCR are 99.0% and 1.17x, respectively.

High Pool Concentration: The pool's 10 largest loans represent
67.8% of its cutoff balance, which is significantly greater than
the 2022 YTD and 2021 averages of 55.5% and 51.2%, respectively.
This results in a Loan Concentration Index (LCI) score of 568,
which is higher than the 2022 YTD and 2021 averages of 423 and 381,
respectively.

Investment-Grade Credit Opinion Loans: The pool includes one loan,
representing 8.8% of the cutoff balance, that received an
investment-grade credit opinion. This is well below both the 2022
YTD and 2021 averages of 16.5% and 13.3%, respectively. Yorkshire &
Lexington Towers is the only credit opinion loan, and it received a
standalone credit rating of 'BBB-sf*'.

Minimal Amortization: Based on scheduled balances at maturity, the
pool will pay down by only 0.5%, which is below the 2022 YTD and
2021 averages of 3.4% and 4.8%, respectively. Twenty-nine loans
representing 97.5% of the pool are full-term IO loans, and two
loans (2.5% of the pool) are partial IO. There are no amortizing
balloon loans.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

Declining cash flow decreases property value and capacity to meet
its debt service obligations. The table below indicates the
model-implied rating sensitivity to changes to the same one
variable, Fitch net cash flow (NCF):

-- Original Rating: 'AAAsf' / 'AA-sf' / 'A-sf' / 'BBBsf' / 'BBB-
    sf' / 'BB+sf' / 'BB-sf' / 'B-sf';

-- 10% NCF Decline: 'AA-sf' / 'A-sf' / 'BBBsf' / 'BBB-sf' /
    'BBsf' / 'BB-sf' / 'B-sf' / 'CCCsf';

-- 20% NCF Decline: 'BBB+sf' / 'BBB-sf' / 'BB+sf' / 'B+sf' /
    'CCCsf' / 'CCCsf' / 'CCCsf' / 'CCCsf';

-- 30% NCF Decline: 'BBB-sf' / 'BBsf' / 'B-sf' / 'CCCsf' /
    'CCCsf' / 'CCCsf' / 'CCCsf' / 'CCCsf'.

Fitch has revised its global economic outlook forecasts as a result
of the war in Ukraine and related economic sanctions. Downside
risks have increased and, therefore, Fitch has published an
assessment of the potential rating and asset performance impact of
a plausible, albeit worse than expected, adverse stagflation
scenario on Fitch's major structured finance and covered bond
subsectors (What a Stagflation Scenario Would Mean for Global
Structured Finance).

Fitch expects the North American CMBS sector in the assumed adverse
scenario to experience virtually no impact on ratings performance,
indicating very few rating or Outlook changes. Fitch expects the
asset performance impact of the adverse case scenario to be more
modest than the most stressful scenario shown above, which assumes
a further 30% decline from Fitch's NCF at issuance.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

Improvement in cash flow increases property value and capacity to
meet its debt service obligations. The table below indicates the
model-implied rating sensitivity to changes in one variable, Fitch
NCF:

-- Original Rating: 'AAAsf' / 'AA-sf' / 'A-sf' / 'BBBsf' / 'BBB-
    sf' / 'BB+sf' / 'BB-sf' / 'B-sf';

-- 20% NCF Increase: 'AAAsf' / 'AAAsf' / 'AA+sf' / 'A+sf' / 'A-
    sf' / 'BBB+sf' / 'BBBsf' / 'BBB-sf'.


BLACKROCK DLF IX 2020-1: DBRS Finalizes B Rating on Class W Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. finalized its provisional ratings on the following
classes of Notes issued by BlackRock DLF IX 2020-1 CLO, LLC,
pursuant to the Note Purchase and Security Agreement (the NPSA)
dated as of July 21, 2020, among BlackRock DLF IX 2020-1 CLO, LLC,
as Issuer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent,
Custodian, Document Custodian, Collateral Administrator,
Information Agent, and Note Agent, and the Purchasers referred to
therein:

-- Class A-1 Notes at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-2 Notes at AAA (sf)
-- Class B Notes at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C Notes at A (high) (sf)
-- Class D Notes at BBB (high) (sf)
-- Class E Notes at BB (high) (sf)
-- Class W Notes at B (sf)

The finalized ratings on the Class A-1 and A-2 Notes address the
timely payment of interest (excluding the additional interest
payable at the Post-Default Rate, as defined in the NPSA) and the
ultimate payment of principal on or before the Stated Maturity of
July 21, 2030.

The finalized ratings on the Class B, C, D, E, and W Notes address
the ultimate payment of interest (excluding the additional interest
payable at the Post-Default Rate, as defined in the NPSA) and the
ultimate payment of principal on or before the Stated Maturity of
July 21, 2030. The Class W Notes have a fixed-rate coupon that is
lower than the spread/coupon of some of the more-senior Secured
Notes. The Class W Notes also benefit from the Class W Note Payment
Amount, which allows for principal repayment of the Class W Notes
with collateral interest proceeds, in accordance with the Priority
of Payments.

The rationale for the finalization of the provisional rating is the
completion of the Phase I Commitment Period, as defined in the
NPSA. As a result, DBRS Morningstar was able to finalize the
provisional ratings on the Secured Notes.

The notes are collateralized primarily by a portfolio of U.S.
middle-market corporate loans. The Issuer is managed by BlackRock
Capital Investment Advisors, LLC (BCIA), which is a wholly owned
subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc. DBRS Morningstar considers BCIA an
acceptable collateralized loan obligation (CLO) manager.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



BX TRUST 2022-PSB: Fitch to Rate Class HRR Debt 'B-sf'
------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned the following expected ratings and
Rating Outlooks to BX Trust 2022-PSB, commercial mortgage
pass-through certificates, series 2022-PSB:

Fitch expects to rate the transaction and assign Outlooks as
follows:

-- $1,397,000,000 class A 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $455,700,000a class X-CP 'BBB-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $651,000,000a class X-NCP 'BBB-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $189,300,000 class B 'AA-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $212,700,000 class C 'A-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $249,000,000 class D 'BBB-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $278,300,000 class E 'BB-sf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $270,600,000 class F 'Bsf'; Outlook Stable;

-- $136,720,000b class HRR 'B-sf'; Outlook Stable.

(a) Notional amount and interest-only (IO).

(b) Non-offered horizontal credit risk retention interest.

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

The BX Trust 2022-PSB, commercial mortgage pass-through
certificates, series 2022-PSB (BX 2022-PSB) represent the
beneficial interest in a $2.73 billion, two-year initial-term (with
three, one-year extension options), floating-rate, IO commercial
mortgage loan. The mortgage loan is secured by the borrower's fee
simple interests in 138 primarily industrial and office/flex
properties located across six states.

The $2.73 billion loan finances the sponsor's acquisition of 138
properties, which has an appraised value of $4.3 billion, and fund
upfront reserves and pay closing costs. The loan is sponsored by
Blackstone Real Estate Partners IX L.P.

The loan was co-originated by five originators: Bank of America,
National Association; Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.; Citi Real
Estate Funding Inc.; Morgan Stanley Bank N.A.; and Societe Generale
Financial Corporation. KeyBank National Association is expected to
be the servicer, and 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC is expected to be
the special servicer. The trustee will be Computershare Trust
Company, National Association, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC
will act as operating advisor.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Fitch Stressed Leverage: The $2.73 billion mortgage loan has a
Fitch debt service coverage ratio of 0.78x, stressed loan-to-value
ratio (LTV) of 113.5%, and base case LTV of 91.1%. The total
mortgage debt represents $167 psf. Additional mezzanine debt is
permitted subject to debt yield and LTV thresholds.

Property and Tenant Diversity: The portfolio is highly diverse and
consists of 138 properties located in 13 markets across six states.
The largest market concentration is Miami, consisting of 22
properties in a single business park (21.1% of NRA, 24.0% of ALA).
The tenancy is also highly diverse, totaling over 2,900 tenants.
The largest tenant in the portfolio by size accounts for 2.1% of
the NRA. Of the portfolio's 138 individual properties, 22 are
single tenanted; however, some of the single-tenanted properties
are located within larger multi-tenanted business parks that serve
as collateral.

Experienced Sponsorship, Including with Industrial Properties: The
loan is sponsored by Blackstone Real Estate Partners IX L.P., an
affiliate of Blackstone Inc. Blackstone Real Estate has
approximately $320 billion of investor capital under management. It
is the largest owner of commercial real estate globally, and its
portfolio includes properties throughout the world with a mix of
property types. Blackstone Inc. has acquired over 600 million sf of
industrial space globally since 2010.

Infill Locations and Flexible Uses: The properties are generally
located in infill industrial areas with proximity to highways and
airports in major markets, an advantage as e-commerce shoppers'
expectations for delivery times have shortened. The tenant spaces
can be used for a variety of purposes; the portfolio's weighted
average office finish is 38.1%. Although the primary property type
is industrial, the portfolio includes office, retail and
self-storage uses.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

Declining cash flow decreases property value and capacity to meet
its debt service obligations. The table below indicates the model
implied rating sensitivity to changes in one variable, Fitch net
cash flow (NCF):

Original Rating: 'AAAsf'/'AA-sf'/'A-sf'/'BBB-sf':

--10% NCF Decline: 'AAsf'/A-sf'/'BBB-sf'/'BBsf';

--20% NCF Decline: 'Asf'/'BBB-sf'/'BBsf'/'B+sf';

--30% NCF Decline: 'BBBsf'/'BBsf'/'B+sf'/'B-sf'.

Fitch has revised its global economic outlook forecasts as a result
of the war in Ukraine and related economic sanctions. Downside
risks have increased and, therefore, Fitch has published an
assessment of the potential rating and asset performance impact of
a plausible, albeit worse than expected, adverse stagflation
scenario on Fitch's major structured finance and covered bond
subsectors (What a Stagflation Scenario Would Mean for Global
Structured Finance).

Fitch expects the North American CMBS sector in the assumed adverse
scenario to experience virtually no impact on ratings performance,
indicating very few rating or Outlook changes. Fitch expects the
asset performance impact of the adverse case scenario to be more
modest than the most stressful scenario shown above, which assumes
a further 30% decline from Fitch's NCF at issuance.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

Similarly, improvement in cash flow increases property value and
capacity to meet its debt service obligations. The table below
indicates the model implied rating sensitivity to changes to the
same one variable, Fitch NCF:

Original Rating: 'AAAsf'/'AA-sf'/'A-sf'/'BBB-sf':

--20% NCF Increase: 'AAAsf'/'AAAsf'/'AAsf'/'A-sf'.


BXHPP TRUST 2021-FILM: DBRS Confirms BB Rating on Class E Certs
---------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. confirmed the ratings on the following classes of
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2021-FILM
issued by BXHPP Trust 2021-FILM:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class X-CP at A (sf)
-- Class X-FP at A (sf)
-- Class X-NCP at A (sf)
-- Class C at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class E at BB (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating confirmations reflect the overall stable performance of
the transaction. The trust loan is a five-year (two years plus
three one-year extensions) floating-rate, interest-only (IO)
mortgage loan with an outstanding principal balance of $1.1 billion
secured primarily by the borrower's fee-simple and/or leasehold
interests in five Class A office properties and three studio
facilities in Los Angeles. While not contiguous with each other,
the properties come together to form a synergistic creative campus
in Hollywood that is attractive for tenants in the content creation
space. The borrower is a special-purpose entity affiliate of a
joint venture partnership established between Blackstone Property
Partners (49%) and Hudson Pacific Properties L.P. (HPP; 51%) to own
and operate the collateral, which represents a
high-barrier-to-entry real estate portfolio that serves as a hub
for a growing industry (digital content).

The loan is structured to allow individual parcels to be released
with a relatively weak prepayment premium of only 105% for the
first 30% of the loan balance and 110% of the balance thereafter.
As of the July 2022 remittance, no properties had been released. In
connection with the mortgage loan, the borrower entered into an
interest rate cap agreement with a Libor strike price equal to
3.5%, which is required to be in effect until the initial maturity
date. The borrower is also obligated to provide a replacement
interest rate cap agreement for any extension period.

The office component, totaling 967,000 square feet (sf), has no
scheduled lease expirations until more than five years after loan
maturity. The studio assets, totaling 1.3 million sf, benefit from
longer-term lease structures that are less common for studio
properties. The properties have also performed well despite initial
disruptions in production schedules related to the ongoing
Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic.

The servicer provided a consolidated YE2021 operating statement
analysis report, which showed some notable discrepancies when
compared with the issuer's expectations. DBRS Morningstar has
requested additional information regarding the below figures, and
as of the date of this press release, a response is pending.
Effective gross income was down $14.1 million dollars (-8.42%),
while total operating expenses were up $19.0 million (28.9%). The
repairs and maintenance line item was particularly high, increasing
to $66.0 million from the issuer's figure of $10.8 million,
representing more than a 500% increase. As a result of these
variances, net cash flow (NCF) had decreased to $66.6 million from
the issuer's $99.6 million, and the DBRS Morningstar NCF of $91.3
million. However, the loan continues to remain current, and the
YE2021 debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) was still covering at
4.44 times (x) compared with the issuer's DSCR of 6.62x.

According to a rent roll dated March 31, 2022, the portfolio was
89.0% occupied, with the largest tenant occupying 56.7% of the net
rentable area (NRA), across both the studio and office space. The
largest tenant that occupies the majority of the office space and a
significant portion of the studio space is a publicly traded media
services company with more than $20 billion in annual revenue.
Company 3, a comprehensive postproduction facility for features,
commercials, and music videos, is the second-largest tenant with
only 5.8% of NRA, and Streamline Media is the third-largest tenant
with 5.5% of NRA. No other tenant represents more than 5.5% of
NRA.

Although studio leases are generally shorter term—typically six
to 12 months—the sponsor has successfully executed longer-term
lease agreements with the studio tenants, which currently have a
weighted-average lease term of 7.23 years. Recent leasing spreads
for the sound stages have been significant, with a 30% positive
leasing spread on the largest tenant's right-of-first-offer on four
stages at the Sunset Gower property and approximately 13.0% for the
ABC Studios' renewal through June 2023 at the Sunset Las Palmas
property, where it films the television series Station 19.
Furthermore, the sponsor has negotiated must-take minimums with
various tenants for grip and light rentals, which reduces the
volatility of the grip and light revenue line item.

The properties, specifically the studio component, benefit from
high barriers to entry. There have been no substantial deliveries
of new studio space to the Los Angeles market in the past 20 years,
in part because the high cost of land makes it economically
unattractive to construct new studio space. The office and studio
components collectively form what is effectively a creative campus
for digital content, which DBRS Morningstar believes to be
synergistic for tenants at both the office and the studio parcels.

DBRS Morningstar believes that growing demand for creative digital
content is likely to continue, and the properties collectively
serve as a major creative hub for one of the largest digital
streaming services and content producers in the world.

The studio component of the transaction requires specialized
knowledge and expertise in order to operate and lease effectively.
For example, HPP handles leasing of the studio component through an
in-house sales team that specializes in managing relationships with
various space users. The pool of potential buyers either for the
studio component or the portfolio as a whole may be more limited
than other, more traditional property types.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



CHC COMMERCIAL 2019-CHC: DBRS Confirms BB Rating on Class E Certs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited confirmed its ratings on all classes of the Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates issued by CHC Commercial
Mortgage Trust 2019-CHC as follows:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (sf)
-- Class X at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (high) (sf)
-- Class E at BB (sf)
-- Class F at B (high) (sf)
-- Class HRR at CCC (sf)

The trends on Classes E and F are Negative. All other trends remain
Stable, with the exception of Class HRR, which is assigned a rating
that generally does not carry a trend for commercial
mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) ratings.

DBRS Morningstar changed the trends on Classes E and F to Negative
in September 2020 as a reflection of concerns with the Coronavirus
Disease (COVID-19) pandemic, which has been particularly impactful
for healthcare properties such as those that collateralize the loan
contributed to the subject transaction. With this review, DBRS
Morningstar maintained the Negative trends given the continued
uncertainty regarding the timeline for the property cash flows to
return to levels achieved prior to the pandemic, as further
outlined below.

At issuance, the collateral was backed by the borrower's fee and
leasehold interests in 156 healthcare properties. Since issuance,
three properties (Yuma SNF, North Bend & Mt Si SNF, and Greeley
MOB) were released from the collateral, resulting in a collateral
reduction of just 0.7%. Mortgage loan proceeds of approximately
$1.02 billion, alongside $489.8 million of mezzanine debt and
$146.0 million of sponsor equity, refinanced $1.6 billion of
existing debt, funded upfront reserves, and paid closing costs. The
loan had an initial two-year term with three 12-month extension
options. The loan recently exercised its second extension option,
extending the loan maturity through June 2023.

The geographically diverse portfolio includes medical office
buildings (MOB), independent living facilities (ILF), assisted
living facilities (ALF), skilled nursing facilities (SNF), and
hospital-related properties. The properties fall under three
operating segments: (1) MOB, (2) triple net (NNN) leased, and (3)
Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) Investment Diversification and
Empowerment Act (RIDEA) facilities.

The majority of the portfolio is backed by the MOB segment, which
comprises 3.0 million square feet across 88 buildings in 18 states.
The NNN leased segment includes 55 properties that skew toward more
operationally intensive uses and includes 35 SNF, 11 ALF, and nine
hospital/long-term acute-care properties. DBRS Morningstar based
the net cash flows for the NNN leased portfolio on the underlying
properties' look-through cash flows rather than the NNN rent.

The RIDEA portfolio consists of 11 properties that provide for a
third-party management agreement and allow the landlord (borrower)
to retain the income from the underlying operation without a lease
in place. The 11 properties contain predominately ILF and ALF beds,
which together comprise approximately 86.3% of the beds in the
RIDEA facilities. ILF and ALF properties are generally private-pay,
limiting the portfolio's exposure to changes in Medicare and
Medicaid reimbursements. The RIDEA properties benefit from a higher
portion of private-pay sources; however, DBRS Morningstar did
factor in additional conservatism in its determination of net cash
flows (NCFs).

As of March 2022, the portfolio was 85.7% occupied, improving from
75.0% at March 2021. Based on the Q1 2022 financials, the loan
reported a trailing-12 month NCF figure of $105.0 million,
reflecting a mortgage loan debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) of
5.21 times (x) and a whole loan DSCR of 2.01x. Despite the decline
in NCF from year-end (YE) 2021 at $108.9 million and YE2020 at
$122.1 million, revenue has remained relatively stable; the decline
has primarily been a result of increased expenses. As of YE2021,
the loan reported a 10.8% decline in NCF and a 12.2% increase in
expenses, largely driven by increased management fees (+69.6% year
over year (YOY)), advertising & marketing (+49.5% YOY), general &
administrative (+31.9% YOY), and other expenses (+43.1% YOY). While
the rise of these expense line items is notable, DBRS Morningstar
views these as a response to dealing with the coronavirus pandemic
given the property type and anticipates these to decline with
updated financial reporting.

The sponsor, Colony Capital (Colony), sold its healthcare portfolio
to Aurora, a healthcare-focused investment firm, in February 2022,
which included the subject properties. Aurora currently manages
over 6,000 beds in healthcare facilities across the United States.
The strong sponsorship, geographical diversity, and recent
occupancy gains suggest continued stable performance for the loan.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



COLT 2022-7: Fitch Assigns Bsf Rating to Class B2 Certs
-------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned final ratings to the residential
mortgage-backed certificates to be issued by COLT 2022-7 Mortgage
Loan Trust (COLT 2022-7).

RATING ACTIONS

ENTITY/DEBT            RATING                        PRIOR
   ----                ------                        -----
COLT 2022-7

  A1                   LT  AAAsf  New Rating         AAA(EXP)sf

  A2                   LT  AAsf   New Rating         AA(EXP)sf

  A3                   LT  Asf    New Rating         A(EXP)sf

  M1                   LT  BBBsf  New Rating         BBB(EXP)sf

  B1                   LT  BBsf   New Rating         BB(EXP)sf

  B2                   LT  Bsf    New Rating         B(EXP)sf

  B3                   LT  NRsf   New Rating         NR(EXP)sf

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

The certificates are supported by 466 nonprime loans with a total
balance of approximately $293.5 million as of the cutoff date.
Loans in the pool were originated by multiple originators,
including Sprout Mortgage, 5th Street Capital and others. Loans
were aggregated by Hudson Americas L.P. Loans are currently
serviced by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) or Northpointe
Bank.

In early July, news emerged that Sprout Mortgage was laying off the
majority of their workforce and shutting down operations. Sprout
Mortgage originated about 50% of the collateral within the
transaction. Fitch feels like the primary risks associated with
Sprout Mortgage have been mitigated against as outlined in Fitch's
presale report.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Updated Sustainable Home Prices (Negative): Due to Fitch's updated
view on sustainable home prices, Fitch views the home price values
of this pool as 8.9% above a long-term sustainable level (versus
9.2% on a national level as of April 2022, down 1.4% since last
quarter). Underlying fundamentals are not keeping pace with the
growth in prices, resulting from a supply/demand imbalance driven
by low inventory, favorable mortgage rates and new buyers entering
the market. These trends have led to significant home price
increases over the past year, with home prices rising 20.4% yoy
nationally as of April 2022.

Non-QM Credit Quality (Negative): The collateral consists of 466
loans, totaling $293.5 million and seasoned approximately two
months in aggregate. The borrowers have a moderate credit profile
-- 730 model FICO and 40% model debt-to-income ratio (DTI) -- and
leverage -- 82.7% sustainable loan-to-value ratio (sLTV) and 75.7%
combined LTV (cLTV). The pool consists of 58.6% of loans where the
borrower maintains a primary residence, while 34.4% comprise an
investor property. Additionally, 65.6% are nonqualified mortgage
(non-QM); the QM rule does not apply to the remainder.

Fitch's expected loss in the 'AAAsf' stress is 27%. This is mostly
driven by the non-QM collateral and the significant investor cash
flow product concentration.

Loan Documentation (Negative): Approximately 83% of the loans in
the pool were underwritten to less than full documentation, and 55%
were underwritten to a bank statement program for verifying income,
which is not consistent with Appendix Q standards and Fitch's view
of a full documentation program. A key distinction between this
pool and legacy Alt-A loans is that these loans adhere to
underwriting and documentation standards required under the
Consumer Financial Protections Bureau's (CFPB) Ability to Repay
(ATR) Rule (ATR Rule, or the Rule), which reduces the risk of
borrower default arising from lack of affordability,
misrepresentation or other operational quality risks due to rigor
of the Rule's mandates with respect to the underwriting and
documentation of the borrower's ATR.

Fitch's treatment of alternative loan documentation increased the
'AAAsf' expected loss by 675 bps relative to a fully documented
loan.

High Percentage of DSCR Loans (Negative): There are 198 debt
service coverage ratio (DSCR) products in the pool (42% by loan
count). These business purpose loans are available to real estate
investors that are qualified on a cash flow basis, rather than DTI,
and borrower income and employment are not verified. Compared with
standard investment properties, for DSCR loans, Fitch converts the
DSCR values to a DTI and treats as low documentation.

Fitch's expected loss for these loans is 39.9% in the 'AAAsf'
stress, which is driving the higher pool expected losses due to the
27% weighted average (WA) concentration.

Modified Sequential-Payment Structure with Limited Advancing
(Mixed): The structure distributes principal pro rata among the
senior certificates while shutting out the subordinate bonds from
principal until all senior classes are reduced to zero. If a
cumulative loss trigger event, delinquency trigger event or credit
enhancement (CE) trigger event occurs in a given period, principal
will be distributed sequentially to class A-1, A-2 and A-3
certificates until they are reduced to zero.

Advances of delinquent principal and interest (P&I) will be made on
the mortgage loans for the first 180 days of delinquency, to the
extent such advances are deemed recoverable. If the P&I advancing
party fails to make a required advance, the master servicer and
then securities administrator will be obligated to make such
advance.

The limited advancing reduces loss severities, as a lower amount is
repaid to the servicer when a loan liquidates and liquidation
proceeds are prioritized to cover principal repayment over accrued
but unpaid interest. The downside to this is the additional stress
on the structure, as there is limited liquidity in the event of
large and extended delinquencies.

COLT 2022-7 has a step-up coupon for the senior classes (A-1, A-2
and A-3). After four years, the senior classes pay the lesser of a
100-bp increase to the fixed coupon or the net WA coupon (WAC)
rate. Fitch expects the senior classes to be capped by the net WAC.
Additionally, after the step-up date, the unrated class B-3
interest allocation goes toward the senior cap carryover amount for
as long as the senior classes are outstanding. This increases the
P&I allocation for the senior classes.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

Fitch incorporates a sensitivity analysis to demonstrate how the
ratings would react to steeper market value declines (MVDs) than
assumed at the MSA level. Sensitivity analysis was conducted at the
state and national level to assess the effect of higher MVDs for
the subject pool as well as lower MVDs, illustrated by a gain in
home prices.

The defined negative rating sensitivity analysis demonstrates how
the ratings would react to steeper MVDs at the national level. The
analysis assumes MVDs of 10.0%, 20.0% and 30.0% in addition to the
model projected 40.8% at 'AAA'. The analysis indicates that there
is some potential rating migration with higher MVDs for all rated
classes, compared with the model projection. Specifically, a 10%
additional decline in home prices would lower all rated classes by
one full category.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

Fitch incorporates a sensitivity analysis to demonstrate how the
ratings would react to steeper MVDs than assumed at the MSA level.
Sensitivity analysis was conducted at the state and national level
to assess the effect of higher MVDs for the subject pool as well as
lower MVDs, illustrated by a gain in home prices.

The defined positive rating sensitivity analysis demonstrates how
the ratings would react to positive home price growth of 10% with
no assumed overvaluation. Excluding the senior class, which is
already rated 'AAAsf', the analysis indicates there is potential
positive rating migration for all of the rated classes.
Specifically, a 10% gain in home prices would result in a full
category upgrade for the rated class excluding those assigned
'AAAsf' ratings.



COMM 2012-LTRT: DBRS Confirms CCC Rating on Class E Certs
---------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. downgraded its ratings on two classes of the Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-LTRT issued by COMM
2012-LTRT Mortgage Trust as follows:

-- Class C to B (high) (sf) from BB (low) (sf)
-- Class D to CCC (sf) from B (low) (sf)

In addition, DBRS Morningstar confirmed its ratings on the
following:

-- Class A1 at AAA (sf)
-- Class X-A at AA (sf)
-- Class A2 at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class B at A (low) (sf)
-- Class E at CCC (sf)

The trends on Classes X-A, A2, B, and C were changed to Stable from
Negative. The trend on Class A1 remains Stable. Classes D and E
have ratings that do not carry a trend.

The ratings downgrades reflect the sustained performance declines
for both loans in the transaction, which are secured by retail
properties, and DBRS Morningstar's expectation of the ultimate
recovery of the second-largest loan in the pool. DBRS Morningstar
had previously assigned Negative trends to Classes X-A, A2, B, C,
and D as a reflection of the potential for further declines in the
outlook for the two loans in this pool as both have experienced
performance declines since issuance, exacerbated by the impact of
the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic. DBRS Morningstar
continues to note the concentration of loans secured by retail
properties, as the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic
disproportionately affected the performance of retail properties.

The subject transaction is evidenced by two promissory notes, each
individually secured by the fee interest in a portion of one of two
super-regional malls known as the Westroads Mall and the Oaks Mall.
The two loans are coterminous with a 10-year loan term, a 30-year
amortization schedule with no interest-only (IO) periods, and a
maturity date of October 1, 2022. As of the July 2022 remittance,
the loans have an aggregate senior note balance of $211.2 million
and an aggregate mezzanine debt balance of $30.2 million. The loans
are not cross-collateralized or cross-defaulted.

The sponsor for both loans is an affiliate of Brookfield Property
Partners L.P. In May 2020, the servicer advised that the sponsor
had notified the servicer of cash flow concerns caused by the
pandemic. A loan modification allowing for a forbearance was
approved for both loans by the master servicer by June 2020 and, as
of the July 2022 remittance, the loan continues to show current
with only nominal outstanding servicer advances, suggesting the
forborne amounts have been repaid as agreed.

Of the two loans backing the transaction, the Westroads Mall loan,
which is secured by the fee interests in 540,304 square feet (sf)
of a 1.1 million-sf regional mall in Omaha, Nebraska, has been the
stronger performer. The noncollateral anchor spaces are occupied by
JCPenney, Von Maur, and First Westroads Bank, while the largest
collateral anchor and junior anchor tenants at the property include
Dick's Sporting Goods, AMC Theatres, and Forever 21. The Forever 21
store remains in operation at the mall and is the only Forever 21
operating in Nebraska after the retailer left Gateway Mall and
Nebraska Crossings in 2019. The mall is a dominant shopping
destination within Omaha, but there is a competing open-air
shopping center in Village Pointe that is within seven miles and
has a concentration of overlapping tenants with Westroads,
including Designer Shoe Warehouse (DSW) and Old Navy. Village
Pointe targets an upscale clientele and its overall tenant mix is
considered superior to the subject's tenant roster as it includes
Apple, Lululemon, and Kendra Scott.

At issuance, Westroads Mall had an occupancy rate of 94.5% and
in-line sales of $458 per square foot (psf). As of the September
2021 rent roll, the occupancy rate of 94.4% was directly in line
with the issuance level but, according to the September 2021 tenant
sales report (TSR), the mall reported in-line sales of $240 psf.
According to the most recent financials, the senior note reported a
debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) of 1.63 times (x) at YE2021,
compared with 1.51x at YE2020 and 1.89x at YE2019. The revenue
increases in 2021 compared with 2020 appear to be directly related
to the recovery from the pandemic. The Westroads Mall loan is
scheduled to mature in October 2022 and, although the struggles of
regional malls in secondary markets that have been exacerbated amid
the pandemic could affect the sponsor's ability to secure takeout
financing, DBRS Morningstar views the generally stable performance
to date as encouraging.

DBRS Morningstar analyzed this loan with a 9.25% cap rate. Using
the YE2021 net cash flow (NCF), the DBRS Morningstar implied value
was $166.2 million, compared with the appraisal value at issuance
of $242.0 million (haircut of 31.3%).

The Oaks Mall loan is secured by the fee interest in 581,849 sf of
a 906,349-sf super regional mall in Gainesville, Florida. The Oaks
Mall is approximately four miles from the University of Florida's
main campus and is anchored by Belk, two Dillard's stores, and
JCPenney. Of the anchors, only one of the Dillard's stores and the
Belk store serve as collateral for the subject loan. At issuance,
additional anchors, Macy's and Dillard's, were operating on ground
leases. The Macy's closed in 2018 and the ground-leased parcel was
purchased by Dillard's and released as collateral for the trust
with net proceeds of $4.9 million from the sale being held in
reserve as additional collateral. Dillard's continues to operate a
second store on the former Macy's parcel. There was also a
non-collateral Sears store at issuance, with the property and
improvements owned by Seritage, until that anchor was closed in
2018. The Sears anchor is now occupied by the University of Florida
Health (UF Health) - The Oaks. UF Health's ear, nose, and throat
doctors' offices previously occupied space in the adjacent Hampton
Oaks Medical Plaza. The property could potentially add additional
office and/or residential space after the City of Gainesville voted
to rezone the property from retail to mixed-use in May 2019. The
mall historically drew traffic from the nearby college campus, but
Butler Plaza, a competing open-air shopping center that is the
largest power center in the Southeastern United States with nearly
2.0 million sf of retail space, is also nearby and has become the
primary retail destination for the area.

At issuance, the Oaks Mall had an occupancy rate of 96.8% and
in-line sales of $368 psf. According to the YE2021 rent roll, the
property was 94.3% occupied, while the September 2021 TSR reported
in-line sales of $151 psf. Although occupancy has remained
relatively stable, DBRS Morningstar notes cash flows have been
trending downward over the past four years. The senior loan's DSCR
dropped to 1.19x at YE2019, from 1.46x at YE2018 and 1.97x at
YE2017. According to the most recent financials, the senior note
reported a YE2021 DSCR of 1.46x, compared with the YE2020 figure of
0.86x. The year over year (YOY) increase was attributed to a 36.8%
decrease in operating expenses, while income remained static. The
YOY operating expense declines are likely not sustainable, as the
largest decreases included a 52.9% decrease in property tax, and a
143% decrease in other expenses. The loan remains on the servicer's
watchlist as the DSCR remains below 75% of the issuer's DSCR of
2.04x. The precipitous cash flow declines began before the loss of
two anchor stores and accelerated following the closures. Although
it is noteworthy that Dillard's took one of the vacant boxes and a
medical tenant took the other, the cash flow trends suggest that
the as-is value has declined sharply since issuance, significantly
increasing the risks for the loan, which is scheduled to mature in
October 2022. Given Brookfield's demonstrated willingness to turn
underperforming properties in its portfolio back to the lenders for
other assets backing commercial mortgage-backed securities loans,
DBRS Morningstar believes the firm's commitment to the subject mall
could be tenuous as well.

DBRS Morningstar analyzed this loan with a 12.0% cap rate. Using
the YE2021 NCF, the DBRS Morningstar implied value was $80.9
million, compared with the appraisal value at issuance of $227.0
million (haircut of 64.3%).

The servicer commentary notes that, while both loans have upcoming
maturities in October 2022, the servicer has not received an update
regarding whether the borrower plans to refinance or repay the
loans at maturity. Final maturity notices were not scheduled to be
sent until July 2022 and DBRS Morningstar has requested further
updates but, as of the date of this press release, a response is
pending.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



COMM TRUST 2020-CBM: DBRS Confirms BB(low) Rating on Class F Certs
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited confirmed its ratings on all classes of Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2020-CBM issued by COMM
Trust 2020-CBM Mortgage Trust as follows:

-- Class A-1 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-2 at AAA (sf)
-- Class X-NCP at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (sf)
-- Class X-CP at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (high) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (high) (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (low) (sf)

In addition, DBRS Morningstar changed the trends on Classes E and F
to Stable from Negative. All remaining classes have Stable trends.
The rating confirmations and trend changes reflect the overall
improved performance of the collateral, as it continues to recover
from the effects of the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic.

The underlying $684.0 million mortgage loan is secured by a
first-priority mortgage on the fee and leasehold interests in 52
limited-service hotel properties totalling 7,677 keys. The trust
loan is part of a split loan structure composed of seven senior
promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $298.0
million, one junior promissory note in the aggregate principal
amount of $286.0 million, and four senior promissory non-trust
notes totalling $100.0 million. The debt contributed to the
transaction consists of the seven senior and one junior promissory
notes totalling $584.0 million.

The portfolio primarily includes older-vintage hotels, with 47
properties, representing 90.4% of the rooms, built in 1989 or
earlier. All the hotels operate under the Courtyard by Marriott
flag, benefitting from strong brand recognition as well as
brand-wide reservation systems, marketing, and loyalty programs.
The properties are located across 25 states, with concentrations in
California, Florida, Illinois, and Colorado representing 25.2%,
7.6%, 7.1%, and 6.6% of the allocated loan amount, respectively.
There was a $99.0 million reserve established at closing to fund
capital improvements across the portfolio. As of the July 2022
servicer reporting, approximately 75% of the reserve has been
depleted, with a current balance of $25.1 million. In addition, the
servicer noted that a second reserve of approximately $70.0 million
will be collected over the next few years to fund additional
improvements to properties within the portfolio.

The sponsor for the transaction is CBM Joint Venture Limited
Partnership, a joint venture between affiliates of Clarion
Partners, LLC (Clarion) and the Michigan Office of Retirement
Services (the majority equity interest holder). Clarion acquired
the portfolio and other interests between 2005 and 2012 and remains
committed to the collateral as evidenced by the $99.0 million
reserve at closing and planned secondary reserve of $70.0 million,
in addition to substantial historical investment of more than
$370.4 million since acquisition.

The portfolio encountered performance challenges because of the
coronavirus pandemic, which led to the near-total cessation of
commercial and leisure travel. The loan transferred to special
servicing in April 2020 in conjunction with the borrower's request
for coronavirus-related relief. Although the lender agreed to
modification terms that included forbearance, the borrower
ultimately abandoned the request for relief, and the loan was
returned to the master servicer in May 2020. As of the July 2022
remittance report, the loan is performing and remains current.

According to the most recent financial reporting, occupancy and
cash flow have improved, although they remain below pre-pandemic
levels. The YE2021 debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) and net cash
flow (NCF) of 1.40 times (x) and $34.3 million, respectively, are
considerably higher than the YE2020 DSCR and NCF of -0.64x and
-$15.7 million but lower than the issuer's DSCR and underwritten
NCF of 3.46x and $169.7 million. Financial reporting for Q1 2022
indicated a further improvement in operating fundamentals, with
annualized NCF climbing marginally higher to $36.6 million.
Likewise, consolidated portfolio occupancy has improved to
approximately 56% at YE2021 compared with 30% at YE2020.

On an aggregate basis, the portfolio has historically outperformed
its competitive sets, with occupancy, average daily
rates, and revenue per available room penetration rates higher than
100% since 2016. Increased capital investment funded through the
reserves will likely help the portfolio maintain and grow its
competitive position while improving the overall financial
performance of underperforming assets.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



CPS AUTO 2022-C: DBRS Gives Prov. BB Rating on Class E Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following classes of
notes to be issued by CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2022-C (the
Issuer):

-- $168,558,000 Class A Notes at AAA (sf)
-- $45,451,000 Class B Notes at AA (high) (sf)
-- $49,132,000 Class C Notes at A (sf)
-- $35,331,000 Class D Notes at BBB (sf)
-- $29,075,000 Class E Notes at BB (sf)

The provisional ratings are based on DBRS Morningstar's review of
the following analytical considerations:

(1) Transaction capital structure, proposed ratings, and form and
sufficiency of available credit enhancement.

-- Credit enhancement is in the form of overcollateralization
(OC), subordination, amounts held in the reserve fund, and excess
spread. Credit enhancement levels are sufficient to support the
DBRS Morningstar-projected cumulative net loss (CNL) assumption
under various stress scenarios.

-- The DBRS Morningstar CNL assumption is 14.30% for the base
transaction, 14.90% if upsized, based on the expected pool
composition.

-- The transaction assumptions consider DBRS Morningstar's
baseline macroeconomic scenarios for rated sovereign economies,
available in its commentary "Baseline Macroeconomic Scenarios For
Rated Sovereigns: June 2022 Update," published on June 29, 2022.
These baseline macroeconomic scenarios replace DBRS Morningstar's
moderate and adverse pandemic scenarios, which were first published
in April 2020.

(2) In addition, the Issuer may upsize the structure during
pre-marketing subject to market conditions up to a total issuance
of $462.8 million.

-- An additional amount up to $152 million in collateral will be
added during the prefunding period, which will begin on the Closing
Date and end no later than September 30, 2022.

(3) The ability of the transaction to withstand stressed cash flow
assumptions and repay investors according to the terms under which
they have invested. For this transaction, the ratings address the
timely payment of interest on a monthly basis and the payment of
principal by the legal final maturity date.

(4) The consistent operational history of Consumer Portfolio
Services, Inc. (CPS or the Company) and the strength of the overall
Company and its management team.

-- The CPS senior management team has considerable experience and
a successful track record within the auto finance industry.

(5) The capabilities of CPS with regard to originations,
underwriting, and servicing.

-- DBRS Morningstar performed an operational review of CPS and
considers the Company to be an acceptable originator and servicer
of subprime automobile loan contracts with an acceptable backup
servicer.

(6) DBRS Morningstar exclusively used the static pool approach
because CPS has enough data to generate a sufficient amount of
static pool projected losses.

-- DBRS Morningstar was conservative in the loss forecast analysis
that it performed on the static pool data.

(7) The Company indicated that there is no material pending or
threatened litigation.

(8) The legal structure and presence of legal opinions that address
the true sale of the assets to the Issuer, the nonconsolidation of
the special-purpose vehicle with CPS, that the trust has a valid
first-priority security interest in the assets, and the consistency
with DBRS Morningstar's "Legal Criteria for U.S. Structured
Finance."

CPS is an independent full-service automotive financing and
servicing company that provides (1) financing to borrowers who do
not typically have access to prime credit-lending terms for the
purchase of late-model vehicles and (2) refinancing of existing
automotive financing.

The rating on the Class A Notes reflects 55.20% of initial hard
credit enhancement provided by the subordinated notes in the pool
(43.20%), the reserve account (1.00%), and OC (11.00%). The ratings
on the Class B, C, D, and E Notes reflect 42.85%, 29.50%, 19.90%,
and 12.00% of initial hard credit enhancement, respectively. The
initial hard credit enhancements are the same for the upsized
transaction. Additional credit support may be provided from excess
spread available in the structure.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



EXETER AUTOMOBILE 2022-4: DBRS Gives Prov. BB Rating on E Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following classes of
notes to be issued by Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-4
(EART 2022-4 or the Issuer):

-- $67,600,000 Class A-1 Notes at R-1 (high) (sf)
-- $110,000,000 Class A-2 Notes at AAA (sf)
-- $100,450,000 Class A-3 Notes at AAA (sf)
-- $85,600,000 Class B Notes at AA (sf)
-- $78,110,000 Class C Notes at A (sf)
-- $75,910,000 Class D Notes at BBB (sf)
-- $62,490,000 Class E Notes at BB (sf)

The provisional ratings are based on DBRS Morningstar's review of
the following analytical considerations:

(1) Transaction capital structure, proposed ratings, and form and
sufficiency of available credit enhancement.

-- Credit enhancement is in the form of overcollateralization
(OC), subordination, a fully funded reserve fund, and excess
spread. Credit enhancement levels are sufficient to support the
DBRS Morningstar-projected cumulative net loss (CNL) assumption
under various stress scenarios.

(2) The ability of the transaction to withstand stressed cash flow
assumptions and repay investors according to the terms in which
they have invested. For this transaction, the ratings address the
payment of timely interest on a monthly basis and principal by the
legal final maturity date.

(3) The DBRS Morningstar CNL assumption is 17.50% based on the
cut-off date pool composition.

-- The transaction assumptions consider DBRS Morningstar's
baseline macroeconomic scenarios for rated sovereign economies,
available in its commentary Baseline Macroeconomic Scenarios For
Rated Sovereigns: June 2022 Update, published on June 29, 2022.
These baseline macroeconomic scenarios replace DBRS Morningstar's
moderate and adverse Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic
scenarios, which were first published in April 2020.

(4) The transaction parties' capabilities with regard to
originations, underwriting, and servicing.

-- DBRS Morningstar performed an operational review of Exeter and
considers the entity to be an acceptable originator and servicer of
subprime automobile loan contracts with an acceptable backup
servicer.

-- The Exeter senior management team has considerable experience
and a successful track record within the auto finance industry.

(5) The credit quality of the collateral and performance of
Exeter's auto loan portfolio.

-- As of the Cut-off Date (July 17, 2022), the collateral has a
weighted-average (WA) seasoning of approximately three months and
contains Exeter originations from Q4 2015 through Q3 2022, with
approximately 93.6% consisting of loans originated since the second
quarter of 2022. The average remaining term of the collateral pool
is approximately 69 months. The WA non-zero FICO score of the pool
is 584.

(6) The legal structure and expected presence of legal opinions,
which will address the true sale of the assets to the Issuer, the
nonconsolidation of the special-purpose vehicle with Exeter, that
the trust has a valid first-priority security interest in the
assets, and consistency with the DBRS Morningstar "Legal Criteria
for U.S. Structured Finance."

The rating on the Class A Notes reflects 56.50% of initial hard
credit enhancement provided by subordinated notes in the pool
(48.35%), OC (7.15%), and the reserve account (1.00%). The ratings
on the Class B, C, D, and E Notes reflect 42.80%, 30.30%, 18.15%,
and 8.15% of initial hard credit enhancement, respectively.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



EXETER AUTOMOBILE 2022-4: S&P Assigns BB (sf) Rating on E Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its ratings to Exeter Automobile
Receivables Trust 2022-4's automobile receivables-backed notes.

The note issuance is an ABS securitization backed by subprime auto
loan receivables.

The ratings reflect S&P's view of:

-- The availability of approximately 58.60%, 50.71%, 41.90%,
32.93%, and 27.56% credit support for the class A (classes A-1,
A-2, and A-3, collectively), B, C, D, and E notes,  respectively,
based on stressed cash flow scenarios (including excess spread).
This credit support provides coverage of approximately 3.05x,
2.60x, 2.10x, 1.60x, and 1.30x S&P's 18.50%-19.50% expected
cumulative net loss range. These break-even scenarios withstand
cumulative gross losses of approximately 90.15%, 78.02%, 67.03%,
52.69%, and 44.09%, respectively.

-- S&P's expectation for timely interest and principal payments on
the notes, based on stressed cash flow modeling scenarios, which,
in its view, are appropriate for the assigned ratings.

-- S&P's expectation that under a moderate ('BBB') stress scenario
(1.60x its expected loss level), all else being equal, its ratings
will be within the credit stability limits specified by section A.4
of the Appendix in "S&P Global Ratings Definitions," published Nov.
10, 2021.

-- The collateral characteristics of the subprime automobile loans
securitized in this transaction.

-- The transaction's payment, credit enhancement, and legal
structures.

  Ratings Assigned

  Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-4

  Class A-1, $67.60 million: A-1+ (sf)
  Class A-2, $110.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A-3, $100.45 million: AAA (sf)
  Class B, $85.60 million: AA (sf)
  Class C, $78.11 million: A (sf)
  Class D, $75.91 million: BBB (sf)
  Class E, $62.49 million: BB (sf)



FANNIE MAE 2022-R08: S&P Assigns BB- (sf) Rating on Cl. 1B-1 Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its ratings to Fannie Mae Connecticut
Avenue Securities Trust 2022-R08's notes.

The note issuance is an RMBS transaction backed by fully
amortizing, first-lien, fixed-rate residential mortgage loans
secured by one- to four-family residences, planned-unit
developments, condominiums, cooperatives, and manufactured housing
to mostly prime borrowers.

The ratings reflect:

-- The credit enhancement provided by the subordinated reference
tranches and the associated structural deal mechanics;

-- The real estate mortgage investment conduit (REMIC) structure,
which reduces the counterparty exposure to Fannie Mae for periodic
principal and interest payments but also pledges the support of
Fannie Mae (as a highly rated counterparty) to cover any shortfalls
on interest payments and make up for any investment losses;

-- The issuer's aggregation experience and the alignment of
interests between the issuer and noteholders in the transaction's
performance, which we believe enhances the notes' strength;

-- The enhanced credit risk management and quality control
processes Fannie Mae uses in conjunction with the underlying
representations and warranties framework; and

-- The potential impact that current and near-term macroeconomic
conditions may have on the performance of the mortgage borrowers in
the pool. S&P said, "On April 17, 2020, we updated our mortgage
outlook and corresponding archetypal foreclosure frequency levels
to account for the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the
overall credit quality of collateralized pools. While
pandemic-related performance concerns have waned, we continue to
maintain our updated 'B' FF for the archetypal pool at 3.25%, given
our current outlook for the U.S. economy, which includes the
Russia-Ukraine military conflict, supply-chain disruptions, and
rising inflation and interest rates."

  Ratings Assigned

  Fannie Mae Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust 2022-R08

  Class 1A-H(i), $19,482,921,116: Not rated
  Class 1M-1, $377,927,000: BBB+ (sf)
  Class 1M-1H(i), $19,891,808: Not rated
  Class 1M-2A(ii), $41,991,000: BBB (sf)
  Class 1M-AH(i), $2,211,090: Not rated
  Class 1M-2B(ii), $41,991,000: BBB (sf)
  Class 1M-BH(i), $2,211,090: Not rated
  Class 1M-2C(ii), $41,991,000: BBB- (sf)
  Class 1M-CH(i), $2,211,090: Not rated
  Class 1M-2(ii), $125,973,000: BBB- (sf)
  Class 1B-1A(ii), $61,202,000: BB+ (sf)
  Class 1B-AH(i), $20,401,858: Not rated
  Class 1B-1B(ii), $61,202,000: BB- (sf)
  Class 1B-BH(i), $20,401,858: Not rated
  Class 1B-1(ii), $122,404,000: BB- (sf)
  Class 1B-2H(i)(iii), $173,408,198: Not rated
  Class 1B-3H(i)(iii), $51,002,411: Not rated

(i)Reference tranche only and will not have corresponding notes.
Fannie Mae retains the risk of these tranches.

(ii)The holders of the class 1M-2 notes may exchange all or part of
that class for proportionate interests in the class 1M-2A, 1M-2B,
and 1M-2C notes and vice versa. The holders of the class 1B-1 notes
may exchange all or part of that class for proportionate interests
in the class 1B-1A and 1B-1B notes and vice versa. The holders of
the class 1M-2A, 1M-2B, 1M-2C, 1B-1A and 1B-1B notes may exchange
all or part of those classes for proportionate interests in the
classes of RCR notes as specified in the offering documents.

(iii)For the purposes of calculating modification gain or
modification loss amounts, classes 1B-2H and 1B-3H are deemed to
bear interest at the secured overnight financing rate (SOFR) plus
10.0% and 15.0%, respectively.



FLAGSHIP CREDIT 2022-3: S&P Assigns Prelim 'BB-' Rating on E Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary ratings to Flagship
Credit Auto Trust 2022-3's automobile receivables-backed notes.

The note issuance is an ABS securitization backed by subprime auto
loan receivables.

The preliminary ratings are based on information as of Aug. 8,
2022. Subsequent information may result in the assignment of final
ratings that differ from the preliminary ratings.

The preliminary ratings reflect S&P's view of:

-- The availability of approximately 41.94%, 36.75%, 28.58%,
23.12%, and 18.52% credit support (including excess spread) for the
class A-1, A-2, A-3 (collectively, class A), B, C, D, and E notes,
respectively, based on stressed cash flow scenarios. These credit
support levels provide coverage of approximately 3.50x, 3.00x,
2.30x, 1.75x, and 1.40x of S&P's 11.25%-11.75% expected cumulative
net loss range for the class A, B, C, D, and E notes, respectively.
These break-even scenarios cover total cumulative gross defaults
(using a recovery assumption of 40.00%) of approximately 69.89%,
61.25%, 47.64%, 38.54%, and 30.87%, respectively.

-- The hard credit enhancement in the form of subordination,
overcollateralization, and a reserve account in addition to excess
spread.

-- The expectation that under a moderate ('BBB') stress scenario
(1.75x S&P's expected loss level), all else being equal, its
preliminary 'A-1+ (sf)', 'AAA (sf)', 'AAA (sf)', 'AA (sf)', 'A
(sf)', 'BBB (sf)', and 'BB- (sf)' ratings on the class A-1, A-2,
A-3, B, C, D, and E notes, respectively, will be within the credit
stability limits specified by section A.4 of the Appendix contained
in "S&P Global Ratings Definitions," published Nov. 10, 2021.

-- The timely interest and principal payments made under stressed
cash flow modeling scenarios that are appropriate for the assigned
preliminary ratings.

-- The characteristics of the collateral pool being securitized.

-- The transaction's payment and legal structures.

  Preliminary Ratings Assigned

  Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2022-3

  Class A-1, $51.20 million: A-1+ (sf)
  Class A-2, $139.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A-3, $108.56 million: AAA (sf)
  Class B, $31.46 million: AA (sf)
  Class C, $48.19 million: A (sf)
  Class D, $31.24 million: BBB (sf)
  Class E, $30.35 million: BB- (sf)



FREDDIE MAC 2022-HQA2: DBRS Finalizes BB Rating on 16 Classes
-------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. finalized the following provisional ratings on the
Structured Agency Credit Risk (STACR) REMIC 2022-HQA2 Notes issued
by Freddie Mac STACR REMIC Trust 2022-HQA2 (STACR 2022-HQA2):

-- $300.0 million Class M-1A at A (low) (sf)
-- $187.0 million Class M-1B at BBB (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2A at BB (high) (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2B at BB (sf)
-- $140.0 million Class M-2 at BB (sf)
-- $140.0 million Class M-2R at BB (sf)
-- $140.0 million Class M-2S at BB (sf)
-- $140.0 million Class M-2T at BB (sf)
-- $140.0 million Class M-2U at BB (sf)
-- $140.0 million Class M-2I at BB (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2AR at BB (high) (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2AS at BB (high) (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2AT at BB (high) (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2AU at BB (high) (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2AI at BB (high) (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2BR at BB (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2BS at BB (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2BT at BB (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2BU at BB (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2BI at BB (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2RB at BB (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2SB at BB (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2TB at BB (sf)
-- $70.0 million Class M-2UB at BB (sf)

Classes M-2, M-2R, M-2S, M-2T, M-2U, M-2I, M-2AR, M-2AS, M-2AT,
M-2AU, M-2AI, M-2BR, M-2BS, M-2BT, M-2BU, M-2BI, M-2RB, M-2SB,
M-2TB, and M-2UB are Modifiable and Combinable STACR Notes (MAC
Notes). Classes M-2I, M-2AI, and M-2BI are interest-only MAC
Notes.

The A (low) (sf), BBB (sf), BB (high) (sf), and BB (sf) ratings
reflect 3.000%, 2.000%, 1.625%, and 1.250%, of credit enhancement,
respectively. Other than the specified classes above, DBRS
Morningstar does not rate any other classes in this transaction.

STACR 2022-HQA2 is the 26th transaction in the STACR HQA series.
The Notes are subject to the credit and principal payment risk of a
certain reference pool (the Reference Pool) of residential mortgage
loans held in various Freddie Mac-guaranteed mortgage-backed
securities.

As of the Cut-Off Date, the Reference Pool consists of 63,625
greater-than-20-year fully amortizing first-lien fixed-rate
mortgage loans underwritten to a full documentation standard, with
original loan-to-value (LTV) ratios greater than 80%. The mortgage
loans were estimated to be originated on or after October 2020 and
were securitized by Freddie Mac between October 1, 2021, and
October 31, 2021.

On the Closing Date, the trust will enter into a Collateral
Administration Agreement (CAA) with Freddie Mac. Freddie Mac, as
the credit protection buyer, will be required to make transfer
amount payments. The trust is expected to use the aggregate
proceeds realized from the sale of the Notes to purchase certain
eligible investments to be held in a custodian account. The
eligible investments are restricted to highly rated, short-term
investments. Cash flow from the Reference Pool will not be used to
make any payments; instead, a portion of the eligible investments
held in the custodian account will be liquidated to make principal
payments to the Noteholders and return amount, if any, to Freddie
Mac upon the occurrence of certain specified credit events and
modification events.

The coupon rates for the Notes are based on the Secured Overnight
Financing Rate (SOFR). There are replacement provisions in place in
the event that SOFR is no longer available. DBRS Morningstar did
not run interest rate stresses for this transaction, as the
interest is not linked to the performance of the reference
obligations. Instead, the trust will use the net investment
earnings on the eligible investments together with Freddie Mac's
transfer amount payments to pay interest to the Noteholders.

In this transaction, approximately 2.3% of the loans were
originated using property values determined using Freddie Mac's
automated collateral evaluation (ACE) assessment rather than a
traditional full appraisal. Loans where the property values were
determined using ACE assessments generally have better credit
attributes.

The calculation of principal payments to the Notes will be based on
actual principal collected on the Reference Pool. For STACR HQA
transactions, beginning with the STACR 2018-HQA2 transaction, there
has been a revision to principal allocation. The scheduled
principal in prior transactions was allocated pro rata between the
senior and nonsenior (mezzanine and subordinate) tranches,
regardless of deal performance, while the unscheduled principal was
allocated pro rata subject to certain performance tests being met.
For the more recent transactions, the scheduled and unscheduled
principal will be combined and allocated pro rata between the
senior and nonsenior tranches only if the performance tests are
satisfied.

For STACR 2022-HQA2, the minimum credit enhancement test is not set
to fail at the Closing Date. This allows rated classes to receive
principal payments from the First Payment Date, provided the other
two performance tests—delinquency test and cumulative net loss
test—are met. Additionally, the nonsenior tranches will be
entitled to the supplemental subordinate reduction amount if the
offered reference tranche percentage increases 5.50%.

The interest payments for these transactions are not linked to the
performance of the Reference Obligations, except to the extent that
modification losses have occurred. The Class B-3H Notes' coupon
rate will be zero, which may reduce the cushion that rated classes
have to the extent any modification losses arise. Additionally,
payment deferrals will be treated as modification events and could
lead to modification losses. Please see the PPM for more details.

The Notes will be scheduled to mature on the payment date in July
2042, but they will be subject to mandatory redemption prior to the
scheduled maturity date upon the termination of the CAA.

The sponsor of the transaction will be Freddie Mac. U.S. Bank Trust
Company, National Association (rated AA (high) with a Stable trend
and R-1 (high) with a Stable trend by DBRS Morningstar) will act as
the Indenture Trustee and Exchange Administrator. Wilmington Trust,
National Association (rated AA (low) with a Stable trend and R-1
(middle) with a Stable trend by DBRS Morningstar) will act as the
Owner Trustee. The Bank of New York Mellon (rated AA (high) with a
Stable trend and R-1 (high) with a Stable trend by DBRS
Morningstar) will act as the Custodian.

The Reference pool consists of approximately 8.2% of loans
originated under the Home Possible® program and 0.1% under HFA
Advantage program. Home Possible® is Freddie Mac's affordable
mortgage product designed to expand the availability of mortgage
financing to creditworthy low- to moderate-income borrowers.

If a reference obligation is refinanced under the Enhanced Relief
Refinance Program, the resulting refinanced reference obligation
may be included in the Reference Pool as a replacement of the
original reference obligation. The Enhanced Relief Refinance
Program provides refinance opportunities to borrowers with existing
Freddie Mac mortgages who are current in their mortgage payments
but whose loan-to-value ratios (LTVs) exceed the maximum permitted
for standard refinance products. The refinancing and replacement of
a reference obligation under this program will not constitute a
credit event.

For this transaction, if a loan becomes delinquent and the related
servicer reports that such loan is in disaster forbearance before
the sixth reporting period from the landfall of a hurricane,
Freddie Mac will remove the loan from the pool to the extent the
related mortgaged property is located in a Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) major disaster area and in which FEMA has
authorized individual assistance to homeowners in such area as a
result of such hurricane that affects such related mortgaged
property prior to the Closing Date.

The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and the resulting
isolation measures have caused an immediate economic contraction,
leading to sharp increases in unemployment rates and income
reductions for many consumers. Shortly after the onset of the
pandemic, DBRS Morningstar saw an increase in delinquencies for
many residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) asset classes.

Such mortgage delinquencies were mostly in the form of
forbearances, which are generally short-term periods of payment
relief that may perform very differently from traditional
delinquencies. At the onset of the pandemic, the option to forbear
mortgage payments was widely available, driving forbearances to an
elevated level. When the dust settled, loans with
coronavirus-induced forbearance in 2020 performed better than
expected, thanks to government aid, low LTVs, and acceptable
underwriting in the mortgage market in general. Across nearly all
RMBS asset classes, delinquencies have been gradually trending
downward, as forbearance periods come to an end for many
borrowers.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



FREDDIE MAC 2022-HQA3: DBRS Gives Prov. BB Rating on 16 Classes
---------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned the following provisional ratings to the
Structured Agency Credit Risk (STACR) REMIC 2022-HQA3 Notes to be
issued by Freddie Mac STACR REMIC Trust 2022-HQA3 (STACR
2022-HQA3):

-- $285.0 million Class M-1A at A (low) (sf)
-- $146.0 million Class M-1B at BBB (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2A at BB (high) (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2B at BB (sf)
-- $109.0 million Class M-2 at BB (sf)
-- $109.0 million Class M-2R at BB (sf)
-- $109.0 million Class M-2S at BB (sf)
-- $109.0 million Class M-2T at BB (sf)
-- $109.0 million Class M-2U at BB (sf)
-- $109.0 million Class M-2I at BB (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2AR at BB (high) (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2AS at BB (high) (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2AT at BB (high) (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2AU at BB (high) (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2AI at BB (high) (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2BR at BB (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2BS at BB (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2BT at BB (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2BU at BB (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2BI at BB (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2RB at BB (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2SB at BB (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2TB at BB (sf)
-- $54.5 million Class M-2UB at BB (sf)

Classes M-2, M-2R, M-2S, M-2T, M-2U, M-2I, M-2AR, M-2AS, M-2AT,
M-2AU, M-2AI, M-2BR, M-2BS, M-2BT, M-2BU, M-2BI, M-2RB, M-2SB,
M-2TB, and M-2UB are Modifiable and Combinable STACR Notes (MAC
Notes). Classes M-2I, M-2AI, and M-2BI are interest-only MAC
Notes.

The A (low) (sf), BBB (sf), BB (high) (sf), and BB (sf) ratings
reflect 3.000%, 2.000%, 1.625%, and 1.250% of credit enhancement,
respectively. Other than the specified classes above, DBRS
Morningstar does not rate any other classes in this transaction.

STACR 2022-HQA3 is the 27th transaction in the STACR HQA series.
The Notes are subject to the credit and principal payment risk of a
certain reference pool (the Reference Pool) of residential mortgage
loans held in various Freddie Mac-guaranteed mortgage-backed
securities.

As of the Cut-Off Date, the Reference Pool consists of 49,292
greater-than-20-year fully amortizing first-lien fixed-rate
mortgage loans underwritten to a full documentation standard, with
original loan-to-value (LTV) ratios greater than 80%. The mortgage
loans were estimated to be originated on or after November 2020 and
were securitized by Freddie Mac between November 1, 2021, and
November 30, 2021.

On the Closing Date, the trust will enter into a Collateral
Administration Agreement (CAA) with Freddie Mac. Freddie Mac, as
the credit protection buyer, will be required to make transfer
amount payments. The trust is expected to use the aggregate
proceeds realized from the sale of the Notes to purchase certain
eligible investments to be held in a custodian account. The
eligible investments are restricted to highly rated, short-term
investments. Cash flow from the Reference Pool will not be used to
make any payments; instead, a portion of the eligible investments
held in the custodian account will be liquidated to make principal
payments to the Noteholders and return amount, if any, to Freddie
Mac upon the occurrence of certain specified credit events and
modification events.

The coupon rates for the Notes are based on the Secured Overnight
Financing Rate (SOFR). There are replacement provisions in place in
the event that SOFR is no longer available. DBRS Morningstar did
not run interest rate stresses for this transaction, as the
interest is not linked to the performance of the reference
obligations. Instead, the trust will use the net investment
earnings on the eligible investments together with Freddie Mac's
transfer amount payments to pay interest to the Noteholders.

In this transaction, approximately 1.9% of the loans were
originated using property values determined using Freddie Mac's
automated collateral evaluation (ACE) assessment rather than a
traditional full appraisal. Loans where the property values were
determined using ACE assessments generally have better credit
attributes.

The calculation of principal payments to the Notes will be based on
actual principal collected on the Reference Pool. For STACR HQA
transactions, beginning with the STACR 2018-HQA2 transaction, there
has been a revision to principal allocation. The scheduled
principal in prior transactions was allocated pro rata between the
senior and nonsenior (mezzanine and subordinate) tranches,
regardless of deal performance, while the unscheduled principal was
allocated pro rata subject to certain performance tests being met.
For the more recent transactions, the scheduled and unscheduled
principal will be combined and allocated pro rata between the
senior and nonsenior tranches only if the performance tests are
satisfied.

For STACR 2022-HQA3, the minimum credit enhancement test is not set
to fail at the Closing Date. This allows rated classes to receive
principal payments from the First Payment Date, provided the other
two performance tests—delinquency test and cumulative net loss
test—are met. Additionally, the nonsenior tranches will be
entitled to the supplemental subordinate reduction amount if the
offered reference tranche percentage increases 5.50%.

The interest payments for these transactions are not linked to the
performance of the Reference Obligations, except to the extent that
modification losses have occurred. The Class B-3H Notes' coupon
rate will be zero, which may reduce the cushion that rated classes
have to the extent any modification losses arise. Additionally,
payment deferrals will be treated as modification events and could
lead to modification losses. Please see the Private Placement
Memorandum for more details.

The Notes will be scheduled to mature on the payment date in August
2042, but they will be subject to mandatory redemption prior to the
scheduled maturity date upon the termination of the CAA.

The sponsor of the transaction will be Freddie Mac. U.S. Bank Trust
Company, National Association (rated AA (high) with a Stable trend
and R-1 (high) with a Stable trend by DBRS Morningstar) will act as
the Indenture Trustee and Exchange Administrator. Wilmington Trust
National Association (rated AA (low) with a Stable trend and R-1
(middle) with a Stable trend by DBRS Morningstar) will act as the
Owner Trustee. The Bank of New York Mellon (rated AA (high) with a
Stable trend and R-1 (high) with a Stable trend by DBRS
Morningstar) will act as the Custodian.

The Reference Pool consists of approximately 8.0% of loans
originated under the Home Possible® and HFA Advantage programs.
Home Possible® is Freddie Mac's affordable mortgage product
designed to expand the availability of mortgage financing to
creditworthy low- to moderate-income borrowers.

If a Reference Obligation is refinanced under the Enhanced Relief
Refinance Program, the resulting refinanced reference obligation
may be included in the Reference Pool as a replacement of the
original reference obligation. The Enhanced Relief Refinance
Program provides refinance opportunities to borrowers with existing
Freddie Mac mortgages who are current in their mortgage payments
but whose LTVs exceed the maximum permitted for standard refinance
products. The refinancing and replacement of a reference obligation
under this program will not constitute a credit event.

For this transaction, if a loan becomes delinquent and the related
servicer reports that such loan is in disaster forbearance before
the sixth reporting period from the landfall of a hurricane,
Freddie Mac will remove the loan from the pool to the extent the
related mortgaged property is located in a Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) major disaster area and in which FEMA has
authorized individual assistance to homeowners in such area as a
result of such hurricane that affects such related mortgaged
property prior to the Closing Date.

The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and the resulting
isolation measures have caused an immediate economic contraction,
leading to sharp increases in unemployment rates and income
reductions for many consumers. Shortly after the onset of the
pandemic, DBRS Morningstar saw an increase in delinquencies for
many residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) asset classes.

Such mortgage delinquencies were mostly in the form of
forbearances, which are generally short-term periods of payment
relief that may perform very differently from traditional
delinquencies. At the onset of the pandemic, the option to forbear
mortgage payments was widely available, driving forbearances to an
elevated level. When the dust settled, loans with
coronavirus-induced forbearance in 2020 performed better than
expected, thanks to government aid and acceptable underwriting in
the mortgage market in general. Across nearly all RMBS asset
classes, delinquencies have been gradually trending downward, as
forbearance periods come to an end for many borrowers.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



FS RIALTO 2022-FL6: DBRS Gives Prov. B(low) Rating on Cl. G Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following classes of
notes to be issued by FS Rialto 2022-FL6 Issuer, LLC (FS RIAL
2022-FL6):

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D-1 at BBB (high) (sf)
-- Class D-2 at BBB (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class G at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

Classes F and G will be privately placed.

The initial collateral consists of 24 floating-rate mortgage loans
and participation interests in mortgage loans secured by 58 mostly
transitional properties with a cut-off balance totaling $600.0
million, excluding $175.4 million of remaining future funding
commitments and $1.4 billion of pari passu debt. Two loans (NYC
Multifamily Portfolio and NYC Midtown West Multifamily Portfolio)
are cross-collateralized loans and are treated as a single loan in
the DBRS Morningstar analysis, resulting in a modified loan count
of 23. All figures below and throughout this report reflect this
modified loan count. The holder of the future funding companion
participations will be FS CREIT Finance Holdings LLC (the Seller),
a wholly owned subsidiary of FS Credit Real Estate Income Trust,
Inc. (FS Credit REIT), or an affiliate of the Seller.

The holder of each future funding participation has full
responsibility to fund the future funding companion participations.
The collateral pool for the transaction is managed with a 24-month
reinvestment period. During this period, the Collateral Manager
will be permitted to acquire reinvestment collateral interests,
which may include Funded Companion Participations, subject to the
satisfaction of the Eligibility Criteria and the Acquisition
Criteria. The Acquisition Criteria requires that, among other
things, the Note Protection Tests are satisfied, no event of
default (EOD) is continuing, and Rialto Capital Management, LLC
(Rialto) or one of its affiliates acts as the subadvisor to the
Collateral Manager. The Eligibility Criteria has minimum and
maximum debt service coverage ratios (DSCRs) and loan-to-value
ratios (LTVs), Herfindahl (HERF) scores of at least 18.0, and
property-type limitations, among other items. The transaction
stipulates that any acquisition of any reinvestment collateral
interests will need a rating agency confirmation regardless of
balance size. The loans are mostly secured by cash-flowing assets,
many of which are in a period of transition with plans to stabilize
and improve the asset value. The transaction will have a
sequential-pay structure.

For the floating-rate loans, DBRS Morningstar incorporates an
interest rate stress that is based on the lower of a DBRS
Morningstar stressed rate that corresponded to the remaining fully
extended term of the loans or the strike price of the interest rate
cap with the respective contractual loan spread added to determine
a stressed interest rate over the loan term. When the debt service
payments were measured against the DBRS Morningstar As-Is NCF, 21
loans, comprising 92.8% of the initial pool balance, had a DBRS
Morningstar As-Is DSCR of 1.00 times (x) or below, a threshold
indicative of default risk. Additionally, 17 loans, comprising
72.3% of the initial pool balance, had a DBRS Morningstar
Stabilized DSCR 1.00x or below, which is indicative of elevated
refinance risk. The properties are often transitioning with
potential upside in cash flow; however, DBRS Morningstar does not
give full credit to the stabilization if there are no holdbacks or
if other structural features in place are insufficient to support
such treatment.

Three loans, representing 21.4% of the pool balance, are secured by
properties in areas with a DBRS Morningstar Market Rank of 6, 7, or
8, which are characterized as urbanized locations. These markets
generally benefit from increased liquidity that is driven by
consistently strong investor demand. Such markets therefore tend to
benefit from lower default frequencies than less dense suburban,
tertiary, or rural markets. Areas with a DBRS Morningstar Market
Rank of 7 or 8 are especially densely urbanized and benefit from
significantly elevated liquidity. Two loans, comprising 14.6% of
the cut-off date pool balance, are secured by a property in such an
area. While the transaction represents slightly weaker markets than
the FS Rialto 2022-FL5 transaction (17.3% of the initial pool
represented by DBRS Morningstar Markt Rank 7 or 8), the transaction
demonstrates much stronger markets than the FS Rialto 2022-FL4 and
FS Rialto 2021-FL3 transactions that DBRS Morningstar also rated,
which had only 11.9% and 0.0% of the pool, respectively, in a DBRS
Morningstar Market Rank of 7 or 8.

Nine loans, representing 50.2% of the pool balance, are in a DBRS
Morningstar MSA Group of 2 or 3, which represent MSAs with
below-average historical default rates. More specifically, there
are seven loans, representing 40.1% of the pool, in a DBRS
Morningstar MSA Group of 3, which is the best-performing group in
terms of historic CMBS default rates among the top 25 MSAs. The
transaction's MSAs are considerably stronger than the FS Rialto
2022-FL4 and FS Rialto 2021-FL3 transactions, which had 63.2% and
33.6%, respectively, in DBRS Morningstar MSA Group of 2 or 3, and
is comparable to the FS Rialto 2022-FL5 transaction which had 65.6%
of loans secured by properties in the DBRS Morningstar MSA Group of
2 or 3. Additionally, the FS Rialto 2022-FL4 and FS Rialto 2021-FL3
transactions had only 22.1% and 7.8%, respectively, in a DBRS
Morningstar MSA Group of 3.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



GOODLEAP SUSTAINABLE 2022-3: S&P Assigns BB (sf) Rating on C Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its ratings to GoodLeap Sustainable
Home Solutions Trust 2022-3's sustainable home improvement
loan-backed series 2022-3 notes.

The note issuance is an ABS securitization backed by an underlying
trust certificate representing an ownership interest in the trust,
whose assets consist of approximately 97% residential solar loans
and 3% other types of sustainable home improvement loans, totaling
$493.7 million.

The ratings reflect S&P's view of:

-- The credit enhancement available in the form of
overcollateralization, a yield supplement  overcollateralization
amount, subordination for classes A and  B, and a fully funded cash
reserve account;

-- The servicer's operational, management, and servicing
abilities;

-- The obligor base's initial credit quality;

-- The projected cash flows supporting the notes; and

-- The transaction's structure.

  Ratings Assigned

  GoodLeap Sustainable Home Solutions Trust 2022-3

  Class A, $301.881 million: A (sf)
  Class B, $25.918 million: BBB (sf)
  Class C, $27.646 million: BB (sf)



GRACIE POINT 2022-2: DBRS Finalizes BB Rating on Class E Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. finalized its provisional ratings on the following
classes of notes issued by Gracie Point International Funding
2022-2 (the Issuer):

-- $182,700,000 Class A Notes at AA (sf)
-- $44,700,000 Class B Notes at AA (low) (sf)
-- $13,200,000 Class C Notes at A (sf)
-- $9,100,000 Class D Notes at BBB (sf)
-- $4,800,000 Class E Notes at BB (sf)

The ratings are based on DBRS Morningstar's review of the following
analytical considerations:

-- The transaction assumptions consider DBRS Morningstar's
baseline macroeconomic scenarios for rated sovereign economies,
available in its commentary Baseline Macroeconomic Scenarios For
Rated Sovereigns - June 2022 Update, published on June 29, 2022.
These baseline macroeconomic scenarios replace DBRS Morningstar's
moderate and adverse COVID-19 pandemic scenarios, which were first
published in April 2020.

-- While the ongoing coronavirus pandemic has had an adverse
effect on the U.S. borrower in general, DBRS Morningstar expects
the performance of the underlying loans in the transaction to
remain resilient because the life insurance premium loans are fully
collateralized by the cash surrender value from highly rated life
insurance companies and other acceptable collateral that is mostly
either cash or letters of credit from highly-rated banking
institutions. Therefore, the payment sources for the Notes will be
either the life insurance companies or cash held at a trust account
or at an Eligible Account Bank/Eligible Account Firm. DBRS
Morningstar does not expect the economic stress caused by the
pandemic to adversely affect an insurance company's ability to pay
in the short to medium term.

-- Excess spread, a fully funded Reserve Account, and
subordination provide credit enhancement levels that are
commensurate with the ratings of the Offered Notes. Credit
enhancement levels are sufficient to support DBRS
Morningstar-projected expected cumulative loss assumptions under
various stress scenarios.

-- DBRS Morningstar deems Gracie Point, LLC (Gracie Point) an
acceptable originator and servicer of life insurance premium
finance receivables. However, Gracie Point has incurred operating
losses and may continue to incur net losses as it grows its
business. If Gracie Point is unable to fulfill its duties because
of an Administrative Agent Replacement Event or a Servicer Default,
repayment of the Notes would rely on the ability of Vervent Inc.
(Vervent) as the Backup Administrative Agent and Backup Servicer,
to fulfill the duties of Administrative Agent and Servicer under
the Transaction Documents. DBRS Morningstar deems Vervent as an
acceptable backup administrator and backup servicer.

-- The payment sources of the loans underlying the Participations
are life insurance companies that issue the pledged life insurance
policy contracts securing the loans. A potential insolvency of such
life insurance company can adversely impact the collectability of
the cash surrender value or death benefits payable by the life
insurance company. The transaction limits that only Eligible Life
Insurance Companies may issue life insurance policies to be
included in the collateral securing the underlying loans. A portion
of the underlying collateral can be cash collateral that is held at
depository institutions, and the transaction requires them to be
either an Eligible Account Bank or Eligible Account Firm with
minimum required ratings.

-- The collateral pool consists of 24 life insurance companies,
with the top five insurance companies representing approximately
55.11% of the collateral pool. To account for potential losses from
exposure to the largest insurance companies in the collateral pool,
DBRS Morningstar simulated the default of the five largest
insurance companies with rating equivalents lower than the targeted
rating for a tranche.

-- During the Replacement Period, the Issuer may purchase
additional Participations using cash surrender proceeds from
defaulted loans or proceeds from prepaid loans or retained
collections. Therefore, the credit quality of the underlying loans
could change during the Replacement Period. The transaction,
however, only allows a new Participation in a loan that meets the
Replacement Criteria to maintain a similar collateral pool mix as
the closing pool and ensure the related life insurance company or
depository institution of the replacement loan are highly rated.

-- The transaction is exposed to basis risk that will stem from
the mismatch in the rate benchmark between the loans and the Notes
until December 31, 2022. After December 31, 2022, the transaction
will be exposed to the basis risk due to the loans and the Notes
having different payment frequencies.

-- Gracie Point was established in 2010 and issued its first loan
in June 2013, so the Company does not have significant historical
performance data of the loans originated through its platform. Each
underlying loan in the collateral pool, however, is fully
collateralized by a minimum cash surrender value, a letter of
credit, and/or cash collateral, which, coupled with the highly
rated insurance companies and depository institutions, partially
mitigate uncertainty regarding the underlying loans' future
performance.

-- Most of the life insurance premium loans have longer maturity
dates than the Scheduled Maturity Date of the Notes. Therefore, if
the Issuer is not able to refinance or liquidate its
Participations, it may not be able to repay such Notes on the
Scheduled Maturity Date. Under each Designated Finance Loan
Agreement, however, the Finance Lender will have the right to call
a loan as fully due and payable upon the occurrence of a Maturity
Acceleration Event, which will ensure ultimate payments of
principal to the Notes by the Scheduled Maturity Date.

-- The legal structure and expected legal opinions that will
address the true sale of the assets to the Issuer, the
nonconsolidation of the special-purpose vehicle with Gracie Point,
LLC, the trustee will have a valid first-priority security interest
in the assets, and are consistent with DBRS Morningstar's "Legal
Criteria for U.S. Structured Finance."

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



GREEN TREE 1996-8: S&P Raises Class M-1 Notes Rating to B- (sf)
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings completed its review of 13 classes from 11 Green
Tree Financial Corp. Man Hsg Trust transactions issued between 1996
and 1998. S&P raised three ratings and affirmed 10.

The transactions are U.S. ABS transactions backed by pools of
manufactured housing installment sale contracts and installment
loan agreements that are currently serviced by Shellpoint Mortgage
Servicing.

S&P said, "The rating actions reflect the transactions' collateral
performance to date, our views regarding future collateral
performance, the transactions' structures, and the credit
enhancement available. Furthermore, our analysis incorporated
secondary credit factors such as credit stability and sector- and
issuer-specific analysis.

"The upgrades reflect our assessment of the growth in credit
enhancement for the affected classes in the form of subordination,
which we expect will mitigate the impact of losses being higher
than originally expected for these pools. We also took into
consideration the relatively short estimated time horizon for the
notes to be paid in full. The affirmations reflect our view that
the total credit support as a percentage of the amortizing pool
balances, compared with our expected remaining cumulative net
losses, is sufficient to support the current ratings."

  Table 1

  Collateral Performance (%)

  As of the July 2022 distribution date

                                            Prior        Current  
                               60+-day   Expected       expected  
GTFCMHT     Current  Current  delinq.   lifetime       lifetime
series   Mo.  PF (%) CNL (%)  (%)(i)   CNL (%)(ii)      CNL (%)
1996-6   312   1.44   17.32    3.50   17.50-18.50   17.50-18.50
1996-8   310   1.56   16.54    5.54   17.00-18.00   17.00-18.00
1998-8   284   4.40   21.22    7.02   22.75-23.75   22.75-23.75

(i)Aggregate 60-plus day delinquencies as a percentage of the  
  current pool balance.
(ii)As of December 2021.
  Mo.--months.
  PF--Pool factor.
  CNL--cumulative net loss.
  GTFCMHT--Green Tree Financial Corp. Man Hsg Trust.

  Table 2

  Hard Credit Support (%)

                     Prior total hard   Current total hard
  GTFCMHT              credit support       credit support
  series    Class    (% of current)(i)      (%)(ii)(iii)

  1996-6      M-1           45.53              58.26
  1996-8      M-1           48.75              62.13
  1998-8      A-1           72.25              82.85

(i)As of the December 2021 distribution date.

(ii)As of the July 2022 distribution date.

(iii)The current hard credit support consists solely of
subordination. Prior and current total hard credit support exclude
excess spread, if any.

GTFCMHT--Green Tree Financial Corp. Man Hsg Trust.

S&P said, "The 'CCC (sf)' and 'CC (sf)' ratings reflect our view
that our projected credit support will remain insufficient to cover
our projected losses for these classes. As defined in our criteria,
the 'CCC (sf)' level ratings reflect our view that the related
classes are still vulnerable to nonpayment and are dependent upon
favorable business, financial, and economic conditions in order to
be paid interest and/or principal according to the terms of each
transaction. Additionally, the 'CC (sf)' ratings reflect our view
that the related classes remain virtually certain to default. Each
transaction was initially structured with overcollateralization
(O/C) and subordination. However, due to higher-than-expected
losses, the O/C on each of these transactions has been depleted to
zero, and many of the subordinated classes have experienced
principal write-downs.

"We will continue to monitor the performance of the transactions
relative to their cumulative net loss expectations and the
available credit enhancement. We will take rating actions as we
consider appropriate."

  RATINGS RAISED

  Green Tree Financial Corp. Man Hsg Trust
                               Rating
  Series      Class      To              From

  1996-8      M-1        B- (sf)         CCC+ (sf)
  1996-9      M-1        CCC+ (sf)       CCC (sf)
  1998-8      A-1        A- (sf)         BBB (sf)


  RATINGS AFFIRMED

  Green Tree Financial Corp. Man Hsg Trust

  Series      Class     Rating

  1996-2      M-1       CC (sf)
  1996-2      B-1       CC (sf)
  1996-3      M-1       CC (sf)
  1996-3      B-1       CC (sf)
  1996-4      M-1       CCC- (sf)
  1996-5      M-1       CCC- (sf)
  1996-6      M-1       B- (sf)
  1997-4      M-1       CCC- (sf)
  1997-6      M-1       CC (sf)
  1997-7      M-1       CC (sf)



GS MORTGAGE 2013-G1: DBRS Confirms BB Rating on Class DM Certs
--------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited confirmed its ratings on all classes of Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-G1 issued by GS
Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-G1 as follows:

-- Class A-1 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-2 at AAA (sf)
-- Class X-A at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (sf)
-- Class C at A (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class DM at BB (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating confirmations and Stable trends are reflective of DBRS
Morningstar's view that the underlying collateral, while composed
of three mall properties, is generally performing quite well, with
strong sponsorship in place for all three loans and recent
developments that suggest that a refinance or short-term extension
at the 2022 and 2023 maturity dates is likely.

The trust collateral consists of three fixed-rate loans
individually secured by two outlet malls and one regional mall:
Great Lakes Crossing Outlets (Auburn Hills, Michigan), Katy Mills
(Katy, Texas), and Deptford Mall (Deptford, New Jersey), located in
established suburban markets outside of Detroit, Houston, and
Philadelphia, respectively. The three loans reported an aggregate
outstanding principal balance of $483.2 million as of the July 2022
remittance, representing a collateral reduction of 11.2%. The trust
debt amount is inclusive of the Deptford Mall subordinate B note,
which backs the directed certificate Class DM. Collateral reduction
for the trust has been due to amortization of the Great Lakes
Crossing Outlets and Deptford Mall loans. The Katy Mills loan is
interest only (IO) for the entire term.

Great Lakes Crossing Outlets, representing 37.2% of the allocated
pool balance, is secured by a 1.1 million-square-foot (sf) portion
of a 1.4 million-sf outlet center in Auburn Hills, built in 1998
and renovated in 2010 by the former sponsor, Taubman Centers, Inc.
(Taubman). Simon Property Group (Simon) acquired Taubman in late
2020; Simon is now the loan sponsor, and a Simon affiliate serves
as the property manager. The 30-year loan matures in January 2023
and amortizes according to a 30-year schedule. The loan is
shadow-anchored by a noncollateral 25-screen AMC Theatres location
as well as a Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World. As of the March 2022
rent roll, the collateral occupancy was reported at 91.0%, compared
with the year-end (YE) 2020 and issuance occupancy rates of 92.6%
and 94.1%, respectively. The largest collateral tenants at the
property are Burlington Coat Factory (Burlington) (7.2% of the net
rentable area (NRA), lease expiration in January 2030), Round 1
Bowling and Amusement (5.2% of the NRA, lease expiration in
September 2027), Forever 21 (4.2% of the NRA, lease expiration in
January 2023), and Bed Bath & Beyond (3.9% of the NRA, lease
expiration in January 2025). Including Forever 21, tenants
representing 13.8% of the NRA are scheduled to expire by loan
maturity. The property's tenant mix, which includes traditional
retailers, outlet formats, and entertainment options, mimics the
"Mills" properties owned and operated by Simon, such as the Katy
Mills property discussed below, making the subject a natural
addition to the existing Simon portfolio.

As of the most recent financial reporting, the Great Lakes
Crossings Outlets loan reported YE2021 debt service coverage ratio
(DSCR) of 2.20 times (x), above the YE2020 DSCR of 1.92x and DBRS
Morningstar DSCR of 2.04x. According to the YE2021 sales report,
total sales for the mall as a whole averaged $334.40 per square
foot (psf), compared with YE2020 and YE2019 figures of $220.90 psf,
and $239.10 psf, respectively. While the property faces moderate
rollover in the upcoming months, which could introduce some
uncertainty at the 2023 maturity, DBRS Morningstar believes Simon
should be generally well-positioned to obtain a replacement loan
given the recent sales growth, high in-place DSCR, and strong
historical performance for the collateral mall, which serves as a
primary shopping destination for the Detroit area that also offers
popular entertainment options such as Peppa Pig World of Play,
Legoland Discovery Center, and Sea Life Aquarium.

The Deptford Mall loan, representing 33.9% of the allocated pool
balance, is secured by 343,910 sf of in-line space in a 1.0
million-sf regional mall in Deptford, which is located within the
Philadelphia metropolitan statistical area. As previously
described, the loan was bifurcated into a $179.4 million senior
loan contributed to the pooled certificates and a $25.1 million
subordinate, non-pooled rake bond that backs the Class DM
certificate. As of the July 2022 remittance, the senior portion of
the debt had a balance of $143.7 million, while the subordinate
piece supporting the rake bond had a balance of $20.1 million,
representing a whole-loan collateral reduction of 20.1% since
issuance. The 30-year loan matures in April 2023 and amortizes
according to a 30-year schedule. The mall is owned and operated by
Macerich and is anchored by noncollateral tenants including
Boscov's, Macy's, and JCPenney (JCP). MS Portfolio, LLC has
back-filled a part of the dark Sears box with a lease extending
through December 2035 and another tenant, Bonesaw Brewing Company,
is expected to back-fill the remainder of the space, according to a
March 2022 article from Courier Post.

As of the March 2022 rent roll, the subject had a collateral
occupancy rate of 94.6%, compared with the June 2021, YE2020, and
YE2019 rates of 87.3%, 78.8% and 89.8%, respectively. The property
benefits from a granular rent roll, with the largest tenants being
Victoria's Secret (3.2% of the NRA, lease expiration in March
2024), Go! Calendars Go! Games Go! (2.7% of the NRA, lease
expiration in January 2023), and American Eagle Outfitters (2.6% of
the NRA, lease expiration January in 2027). As of the trailing 12
months (T-12) ended March 2022 sales report, tenants that occupy
more than 10,000 sf reported sales of $245 psf, marking an
improvement from the YE2020 figure of $143 psf and the
pre-Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) figure of $214 at YE2019.
Average sales for tenants less than 10,000 sf for the same time
period were reported at $637 psf. The loan reported a YE2021 DSCR
of 1.47x, compared with YE2020, YE2019, and DBRS Morningstar DSCR
of 1.11x, 1.81x and 1.49x, respectively. There is negligible tenant
rollover in the next 12 months, with tenants representing 5.9% of
the NRA set to expire. Given the healthy sales trends, improvement
in the occupancy rate to nearly 95% as of March 2022 and the heathy
in-place DSCR, DBRS Morningstar believes Macerich should be able to
refinance the loan at maturity.

Katy Mills, representing 28.9% of the allocated loan balance, is
secured by a 1.2 million-sf portion of a 1.6 million-sf regional
mall in the Houston suburb of Katy, Texas. The loan is the sole IO
loan in the pool, with an upcoming maturity in December 2022. The
loan is sponsored through a joint venture between Simon and KanAm
USA LLC. Noncollateral tenants include a somewhat eclectic mix for
an outlet mall in a Walmart Supercenter, a Hilton Garden Inn hotel,
and a Caliber Collision in the out lot. There is also a dark former
Toys "R" Us (TRU) outparcel, which has been empty since 2018 when
the retailer filed bankruptcy and closed all locations. As of the
December 2021 rent roll, the collateral was 83.1% occupied,
compared with YE2020 and YE2019 occupancy rates of 76.1%, and
89.0%, respectively. Occupancy declined to 83.0% in 2018 with the
departure of TRU and has struggled to return to the issuance level
of 89.0% since. The largest collateral tenants include Bass Pro
Shops (12.1% of the NRA, lease expiration in October 2024),
Burlington (8.3% of the NRA, lease expiration in January 2025), AMC
Cinema (6.4% of the NRA, lease expiration in October 2029), and
Marshalls (2.7% of the NRA, lease expiration in January 2031).

Despite the occupancy declines, cash flows have remained healthy,
with sustained growth since issuance. The YE2021 net cash flow
figure of $28.5 million is well above the issuer's figure of $21.7
million and comfortably above the YE2019 figure of $26.8 million
DBRS Morningstar considered when ratings were assigned in 2020. As
of the most recent financial reporting, the loan reported a very
strong YE2021 DSCR of 5.75x, compared with the YE2020, YE2019, and
DBRS Morningstar DSCR of 4.91x, 5.42x, and 4.15x, respectively.
Updated sales were requested but have not been provided to date.
Given the similarly diverse tenant mix as previously discussed for
the Great Lakes Crossing Outlets property, as well as the subject's
location within a desirable Houston suburb, high coverage ratio,
cash flow growth from issuance, and strong sponsorship in a JV that
includes Simon, DBRS Morningstar has generally held that the loan
was likely to repay at the December 2022 maturity date. This
appears to have borne out, as a report from CRE Direct released in
early August 2022 noted a major bank had agreed to make a $130.0
million loan that would retire the subject debt. DBRS Morningstar
has requested confirmation of this from the servicer and the
response is pending as of this press release.

At issuance, DBRS Morningstar shadow-rated all three loans
investment grade. With this review, DBRS Morningstar confirmed that
the performance of these loans remains consistent with
investment-grade loan characteristics. Overall, the collateralized
properties are well established draws in their respective markets
and have satisfactory in-line sales performance, high-quality
sponsorship, and low-leverage financing.

Notes: All figures are in U.S dollars unless otherwise noted.



GS MORTGAGE 2018-GS10: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on G-RR Certs
----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited confirmed its ratings on all classes of Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-GS10 issued by GS
Mortgage Securities Trust 2018-GS10 as follows:

-- Class A-1 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-2 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-3 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-4 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-5 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-AB at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class X-A at AAA (sf)
-- Class X-B at AA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (low) (sf)
-- Class X-D at BBB (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class G-RR at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating confirmations reflect the stable performance of the
transaction, which has remained consistent with DBRS Morningstar's
expectations. At issuance, the transaction comprised 33 fixed-rate
loans secured by 57 commercial and multifamily properties with a
trust balance of $810.7 million. As of the July 2022 remittance
report, all loans remain in the pool with an outstanding trust
balance of $801.0 million, representing a nominal collateral
reduction of 1.2% since issuance.

There are three loans—1000 Wilshire (Prospectus ID#2, 8.1% of the
pool balance), Aliso Creek Apartments (Prospectus ID#3, 7.9% of the
pool balance), and Marina Heights State Farm (Prospectus ID#11,
3.4% of the pool balance)—that were shadow-rated investment grade
by DBRS Morningstar at issuance. With this review, DBRS Morningstar
confirmed that the performance of these loans remains consistent
with investment-grade loan characteristics.

As of the July 2022 remittance, no loans have been defeased, nor
are there any loans in special servicing. There are six loans on
the servicer's watchlist, representing 11.0% of the pool balance.
The servicer is monitoring these loans for a variety of reasons,
including low debt service coverage ratio (DSCR), concerns with
occupancy, and/or tenant rollover risk.

DBRS Morningstar has been closely monitoring the largest loan in
the pool, GSK North American HQ (Prospectus ID#1, 9.4% of the pool
balance), following the decision by the property's single tenant,
GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK), to vacate its space in Q1 2022, as
announced in 2021. The subject loan is secured by a Class A office
complex in Philadelphia's Navy Yard submarket. The property was
built-to-suit for GSK at a cost of $80.0 million in 2013, when GSK
executed a 15-year lease through September 2028 with no termination
options.

Although the subject is now physically vacant, GSK will continue to
honor its rental payments through the remainder of the lease term.
According to the servicer, Jones Lang LaSalle has been engaged to
market the space for sublease. The loan was structured with a cash
flow sweep that was to be triggered if GSK vacated or went dark in
at least 90% of its space, excluding subleases signed by GSK. As of
the July 2022 reporting, the servicer noted $1.7 million being held
in the cash management account but no funds held in tenant
reserves. Office properties in the South Philadelphia submarket
have historically reported strong market fundamentals, supported by
the Q1 2022 vacancy rate of 1.1% as reported by Reis.

According to an article published by The Philadelphia Inquirer on
June 28, 2022, a $6.0 billion investment plan to revitalize and
redevelop the Navy Yard over the next 20 years was announced, with
the hope of creating a new neighborhood in the city. This plan is
estimated to bring 12,000 new jobs to the Navy Yard, as well as 8.9
million square feet (sf) of new residential, commercial, retail,
and mixed-use space. The developers, Mosaic Development Partners
and Ensemble Real Estate Investments, plan to build 4,000
residential units as part of the redevelopment.

Based on the annualized Q1 2022 financials, the loan reported a
DSCR of 2.40 times (x), compared with the YE2021 and YE2020 DSCR of
2.33x. The historically strong DSCR figures suggest that some
meaningful excess cash can be trapped between the trigger event and
loan maturity in June 2023. According to the appraisal at issuance,
the dark value of the property was reported at $91.8 million, which
is in excess of the whole-loan amount of $85.2 million. Although
the loan's refinance risk has significantly increased following the
departure of GSK given the upcoming loan maturity in June 2023,
mitigating factors include historically strong submarket and
property performance in addition to the redevelopment plans
discussed above and the sponsor's commitment to the property. Korea
Investment Management, an investment firm owned by Korea Investment
Holdings Co., Ltd. (a financial services firm in South Korea), is
the loan sponsor and has been working with Coretrust Capital
Partners, LLC, which serves as a domestic asset manager in the
United States. At issuance, the sponsor contributed $45.9 million
of equity to purchase the property.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



GS MORTGAGE 2019-GC42: Fitch Affirms B- Rating on Cl. G-RR Certs
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed 15 classes of GS Mortgage Securities
Trust 2019-GC42" Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates.

RATING ACTIONS

ENTITY/DEBT            RATING                        PRIOR
   ----                ------                        -----
GSMS 2019-GC42

  A-1 36257UAH0        LT AAAsf  Affirmed            AAAsf

  A-2 36257UAJ6        LT AAAsf  Affirmed            AAAsf

  A-3 36257UAK         LT AAAsf  Affirmed            AAAsf

  A-4 36257UAL1        LT AAAsf  Affirmed            AAAsf

  A-AB 36257UAM9       LT AAAsf  Affirmed            AAAsf

  A-S 36257UAQ0        LT AAAsf  Affirmed            AAAsf

  B 36257UAR8          LT AA-sf  Affirmed            AA-sf

  C 36257UAS6          LT A-sf   Affirmed            A-sf

  D 36257UAA5          LT BBBsf  Affirmed            BBBsf

  E 36257UAC1          LT BBB-sf Affirmed            BBB-sf

  F-RR 36257UAD9       LT BB-sf  Affirmed            BB-sf

  G-RR 36257UAE7       LT B-sf   Affirmed            B-sf

  X-A 36257UAN7        LT AAAsf  Affirmed            AAAsf

  X-B 36257UAP2        LT A-sf   Affirmed            A-sf

  X-D 36257UAB3        LT BBB-sf Affirmed            BBB-sf

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Stable Performance: The overall performance remains stable for the
majority of the pool; performance is in line with issuance
expectations. Three loans (5.4%) are flagged as a Fitch Loan of
Concern (FLOC). No loans are delinquent or in special servicing.
Fitch's ratings incorporate a base case loss of 3.9%.

The largest FLOC is the Millennium Park Plaza loan (2.8% of the
pool), which is secured by a mixed-use property located in Chicago,
IL. The property consists of 561 multifamily units, 85,000-sf of
retail space, and 18,000-sf of office space. Located in the Loop in
downtown Chicago and two blocks from Maggie Daley Park, the subject
has experienced pandemic-related performance declines, with overall
occupancy dropping to 85% by year-end (YE) 2020 from 99% at
issuance. As a result, NOI DSCR had significantly declined
reporting at 0.95x as of YE 2021, compared to 1.56x at YE 2020.

Occupancy has since improved to 98% as of YE 2021. The multifamily
portion of the collateral accounts for 76.7% of the base rent and
is 100% occupied as of YE 2021, with office occupancy reporting at
100% and retail at 88%. Fitch expects performance to continue to
improve and return to issuance expectations as the impacts from the
pandemic continues to subside.

Minimal Changes to Credit Enhancement: As of the July 2022
distribution date, the pool's aggregate balance has been reduced by
0.6% to $1.054 billion, from $1.060 billion at issuance. The pool
contains 28 loans that are full interest-only (82.0% of the pool),
five loans that are partial interest-only (8.8% of the pool), and
five loans that are amortizing balloon loans (9.2% of the pool).

At issuance, based on the scheduled balance at maturity, the pool
was expected to pay down by 3.2% prior to maturity, which is lower
than the average for transactions of a similar vintage. There has
been no defeasance, no loans have paid off and there have been no
recognized losses.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Sensitivity factors that could lead to downgrades include an
    increase in pool-level losses from underperforming or
    specially serviced loans.

-- Downgrades to the 'AA-sf' through 'AAAsf' rated-classes are
    not considered likely as performance remains stable and credit

    enhancement (CE) is expected to increase, but may occur should

    interest shortfalls affect these classes.

-- Downgrades to the 'BBB-sf' through 'A-sf' rated classes may
    occur should expected losses for the pool increase
    substantially.

-- Downgrades to the 'B-sf' and 'BB-sf' rated classes would occur

    should base case losses expectations increase and/or as losses

    are realized.

Fitch has identified both a baseline and a worse-than-expected,
adverse stagflation scenario based on fallout from the
Russia-Ukraine war whereby growth is sharply lower amid higher
inflation and interest rates; even if the adverse scenario should
play out, Fitch expects virtually no impact on ratings performance,
indicating very few rating or Outlook changes. However, for some
transactions with concentrations in underperforming retail
exposure, the ratings impact may be mild to modest, indicating some
changes on sub-investment grade notes.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Sensitivity factors that could lead to upgrades would include
    stable to improved asset performance, particularly on the
    FLOCs, coupled with paydown and/or defeasance. Upgrades to the

    'A-sf' and 'AA-sf' rated classes would likely occur with
    significant improvement in CE and/or defeasance; however,
    adverse selection and increased concentrations, or
    underperformance of the FLOCs, could cause this trend to
    reverse.

-- Upgrades to the 'BBBsf' and below-rated classes are considered

    unlikely in the near term and would be limited based on
    sensitivity to concentrations or the potential for future
    concentrations. Classes would not be upgraded above 'Asf' if
    there is a likelihood of interest shortfalls.

-- Additionally, an upgrade to the 'BB-sf' and 'B-sf' rated
    classes is not likely until later years of the transaction and

    only if the performance of the remaining pool is stable and/or

    there is sufficient CE, which would likely occur when the
    nonrated class is not eroded and the senior classes pay off.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Structured Finance
transactions have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as
the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of seven notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of seven notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAAsf' to 'Dsf'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings
are based on historical performance.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


GS MORTGAGE 2022-LTV2: DBRS Gives Prov. BB Rating on B4 Certs
-------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned the following provisional ratings to the
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2022-LTV2 to be issued
by GS Mortgage-Backed Securities Trust 2022-LTV2 (GSMBS
2022-LTV2):

-- $246.7 million Class A-1 at AAA (sf)
-- $246.7 million Class A-X-1 at AAA (sf)
-- $246.7 million Class A-2 at AAA (sf)
-- $246.7 million Class A-X-2 at AAA (sf)
-- $246.7 million Class A-3 at AAA (sf)
-- $246.7 million Class A-X-3 at AAA (sf)
-- $123.3 million Class A-4 at AAA (sf)
-- $123.3 million Class A-X-4 at AAA (sf)
-- $123.3 million Class A-5 at AAA (sf)
-- $123.3 million Class A-X-5 at AAA (sf)
-- $123.3 million Class A-6 at AAA (sf)
-- $123.3 million Class A-X-6 at AAA (sf)
-- $148.0 million Class A-7 at AAA (sf)
-- $148.0 million Class A-X-7 at AAA (sf)
-- $148.0 million Class A-8 at AAA (sf)
-- $148.0 million Class A-X-8 at AAA (sf)
-- $148.0 million Class A-9 at AAA (sf)
-- $148.0 million Class A-X-9 at AAA (sf)
-- $24.7 million Class A-10 at AAA (sf)
-- $24.7 million Class A-X-10 at AAA (sf)
-- $24.7 million Class A-11 at AAA (sf)
-- $24.7 million Class A-X-11 at AAA (sf)
-- $24.7 million Class A-12 at AAA (sf)
-- $24.7 million Class A-X-12 at AAA (sf)
-- $61.7 million Class A-13 at AAA (sf)
-- $61.7 million Class A-X-13 at AAA (sf)
-- $61.7 million Class A-14 at AAA (sf)
-- $61.7 million Class A-X-14 at AAA (sf)
-- $61.7 million Class A-15 at AAA (sf)
-- $61.7 million Class A-X-15 at AAA (sf)
-- $37.0 million Class A-16 at AAA (sf)
-- $37.0 million Class A-X-16 at AAA (sf)
-- $37.0 million Class A-17 at AAA (sf)
-- $37.0 million Class A-X-17 at AAA (sf)
-- $37.0 million Class A-18 at AAA (sf)
-- $37.0 million Class A-X-18 at AAA (sf)
-- $185.0 million Class A-19 at AAA (sf)
-- $185.0 million Class A-X-19 at AAA (sf)
-- $185.0 million Class A-20 at AAA (sf)
-- $185.0 million Class A-X-20 at AAA (sf)
-- $185.0 million Class A-21 at AAA (sf)
-- $185.0 million Class A-X-21 at AAA (sf)
-- $123.3 million Class A-22 at AAA (sf)
-- $123.3 million Class A-X-22 at AAA (sf)
-- $123.3 million Class A-23 at AAA (sf)
-- $123.3 million Class A-X-23 at AAA (sf)
-- $123.3 million Class A-24 at AAA (sf)
-- $123.3 million Class A-X-24 at AAA (sf)
-- $98.7 million Class A-25 at AAA (sf)
-- $98.7 million Class A-X-25 at AAA (sf)
-- $98.7 million Class A-26 at AAA (sf)
-- $98.7 million Class A-X-26 at AAA (sf)
-- $98.7 million Class A-27 at AAA (sf)
-- $98.7 million Class A-X-27 at AAA (sf)
-- $61.7 million Class A-28 at AAA (sf)
-- $61.7 million Class A-X-28 at AAA (sf)
-- $61.7 million Class A-29 at AAA (sf)
-- $61.7 million Class A-X-29 at AAA (sf)
-- $61.7 million Class A-30 at AAA (sf)
-- $61.7 million Class A-X-30 at AAA (sf)
-- $26.4 million Class A-31 at AAA (sf)
-- $26.4 million Class A-X-31 at AAA (sf)
-- $26.4 million Class A-32 at AAA (sf)
-- $26.4 million Class A-X-32 at AAA (sf)
-- $26.4 million Class A-33 at AAA (sf)
-- $26.4 million Class A-X-33 at AAA (sf)
-- $273.0 million Class A-X at AAA (sf)
-- $11.7 million Class B-1 at AA (sf)
-- $7.1 million Class B-2 at A (sf)
-- $5.2 million Class B-3 at BBB (sf)
-- $4.9 million Class B-4 at BB (sf)
-- $771.0 thousand Class B-5 at B (sf)

Classes A-X-5, A-X-6, A-X-11, A-X-12, A-X-17, A-X-18, A-X-29,
A-X-30, A-X-32, A-X-33, and A-X are interest-only certificates. The
class balances represent notional amounts.

ClassesA-1, A-X-1, A-2, A-X-2, A-3, A-X-3, A-X-4, A-5, A-6, A-7,
A-X-7, A-8, A-X-8, A-9, A-X-9, A-X-10, A-11, A-12, A-13, A-X-13,
A-14, A-15, A-X-15, A-X-16, A-17, A-18, A-19, A-X-19, A-20, A-X-20,
A-21, A-X-21, A-22, A-X-22, A-23, A-X-23, A-24, A-X-24, A-25,
A-X-25, A-26, A-X-26, A-27, A-X-27, A-X-28, A-29, A-30, A-X-31,
A-32, and A-33 are exchangeable certificates. These classes can be
exchanged for combinations of exchange certificates as specified in
the offering documents.

Classes A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-5, A-6, A-7, A-8 A-9, A-10, A-11,
A-12, A-13, A-14, A-15, A-16, A-17, A-18, A-19, A-20, A-21, A-22,
A-23, A-24, A-25, A-26, A-27, A-28, A-29, and A-30 are super-senior
certificates. These classes benefit from additional protection from
the senior support certificates (Class A-31, A-32, and A-33) with
respect to loss allocation.

The AAA (sf) ratings on the Certificates reflect 20.00%% of credit
enhancement provided by subordinated certificates. The AA (sf), A
(sf), BBB (sf), BB (sf), and B (sf) ratings reflect 7.65%, 5.35%,
3.65%, 2.05%, and 1.80% of credit enhancement, respectively.

Other than the classes specified above, DBRS Morningstar does not
rate any other classes in this transaction.

This securitization is a portfolio of first-lien fixed-rate prime
residential mortgages funded by the issuance of the Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2022-LTV2 (the Certificates). The
Certificates are backed by 296 loans with a total principal balance
of $308,348,671 as of the Cut-Off Date (July 1, 2022).

Compared with other post-crisis prime pools, this portfolio
consists of higher loan-to-value (LTV), first-lien, fully
amortizing fixed-rate mortgages with original terms to maturity of
up to 30 years. The weighted-average (WA) original combined LTV
(CLTV) for the portfolio is 88.7% and the majority of the pool
(90.4%) comprises loans with DBRS Morningstar-calculated current
CLTV ratios greater than 80.0%, but not higher than 90%. The high
LTV attribute of this portfolio is mitigated by certain strengths,
such as high FICO scores, low debt-to-income ratios, robust income
and reserves, as well as other strengths detailed in the Key
Probability of Default Drivers section of the related report.

The originators for the aggregate mortgage pool are United
Wholesale Mortgage, LLC (UWM; 34.0% of the pool), Fairway
Independent Mortgage Corp. (16.1%), Movement Mortgage, LLC (
11.5%), and various other originators, each comprising less than
10.0% of the pool.

All the mortgage loans will be serviced by Newrez, LLC doing
business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing (SMS).

Computershare Trust Company, N.A. will act as the Master Servicer,
Securities Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Rule 17g-5
Information Provider and Custodian. U.S. Bank Trust National
Association (U.S. Bank; rated AA (high) with a Stable trend by DBRS
Morningstar) will act as Delaware Trustee. Pentalpha Surveillance
LLC (Pentalpha) will serve as the Representations and Warranties
(R&W) Reviewer.

CORONAVIRUS IMPACT

The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and the resulting
isolation measures have caused an immediate economic contraction,
leading to sharp increases in unemployment rates and income
reductions for many consumers. Shortly after the onset of the
coronavirus, DBRS Morningstar saw an increase in the delinquencies
for many residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) asset
classes.

Such mortgage delinquencies were mostly in the form of
forbearances, which are generally short-term periods of payment
relief that may perform very differently from traditional
delinquencies. At the onset of the pandemic, the option to forebear
mortgage payments was widely available, driving forbearances to an
elevated level. When the dust settled, loans with
coronavirus-induced forbearance in 2020 performed better than
expected, thanks to government aid, low LTV ratios, and acceptable
underwriting in the mortgage market in general. Across nearly all
RMBS asset classes in recent months, delinquencies have been
gradually trending downward as forbearance periods come to an end
for many borrowers.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



GS MORTGAGE 2022-LTV2: Moody's Gives (P)B3 Rating to Cl. B-5 Debt
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned provisional ratings to 72
classes of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) issued by
GS Mortgage-Backed Securities Trust 2022-LTV2, and sponsored by
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company.

The securities are backed by a pool of prime jumbo (100% by
balance) residential mortgages aggregated by Maxex Clearing, LLC,
originated by multiple entities and serviced by NewRez LLC d/b/a
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing.

The complete rating actions are as follows:

Issuer: GS Mortgage-Backed Securities Trust 2022-LTV2

Cl. A-1, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-1*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-2, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-2*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-3, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-3*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-4, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-4*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-5, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-5*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-6, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-6*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-7, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-7*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-8, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-8*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-9, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-9*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-10, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-10*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-11, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-11*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-12, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-12*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-13, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-13*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-14, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-14*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-15, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-15*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-16, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-16*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-17, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-17*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-18, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-18*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-19, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-19*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-20, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-20*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-21, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-21*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-22, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-22*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-23, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-23*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-24, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-24*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-25, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-25*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-26, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-26*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-27, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-27*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-28, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-28*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-29, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-29*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-30, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-30*, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-31, Assigned (P)Aa1 (sf)

Cl. A-X-31*, Assigned (P)Aa1 (sf)

Cl. A-32, Assigned (P)Aa1 (sf)

Cl. A-X-32*, Assigned (P)Aa1 (sf)

Cl. A-33, Assigned (P)Aa1 (sf)

Cl. A-X-33*, Assigned (P)Aa1 (sf)

Cl. A-X, Assigned (P)Aa1 (sf)

Cl. B-1, Assigned (P)Aa3 (sf)

Cl. B-2, Assigned (P)A3 (sf)

Cl. B-3, Assigned (P)Baa3 (sf)

Cl. B-4, Assigned (P)Ba3 (sf)

Cl. B-5, Assigned (P)B3 (sf)

*Reflects Interest-Only Classes

RATINGS RATIONALE

The ratings are based on the credit quality of the mortgage loans,
the structural features of the transaction, the origination quality
and the servicing arrangement, the third-party review, and the
representations and warranties framework.

Moody's expected loss for this pool in a baseline scenario-mean is
1.51%, in a baseline scenario-median is 1.12% and reaches 9.99% at
a stress level consistent with Moody's Aaa rating.

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in rating all classes except
interest-only classes was "Moody's Approach to Rating US RMBS Using
the MILAN Framework" published in July 2022.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

Up

Levels of credit protection that are higher than necessary to
protect investors against current expectations of loss could drive
the ratings up. Losses could decline from Moody's original
expectations as a result of a lower number of obligor defaults or
appreciation in the value of the mortgaged property securing an
obligor's promise of payment. Transaction performance also depends
greatly on the US macro economy and housing market.

Down

Levels of credit protection that are insufficient to protect
investors against current expectations of loss could drive the
ratings down. Losses could rise above Moody's original expectations
as a result of a higher number of obligor defaults or deterioration
in the value of the mortgaged property securing an obligor's
promise of payment. Transaction performance also depends greatly on
the US macro economy and housing market. Other reasons for
worse-than-expected performance include poor servicing, error on
the part of transaction parties, inadequate transaction governance
and fraud.


GS MORTGAGE 2022-RPL3: DBRS Gives B Rating on Class B-2 Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned ratings to the Mortgaged-Backed Securities,
Series 2022-RPL3 issued by GS Mortgage-Backed Securities Trust
2022-RPL3 (GSMBS 2022-RPL3 or the Trust), as follows:

-- $967.8 million Class A-1 at AAA (sf)
-- $37.3 million Class A-2 at AA (sf)
-- $1.0 billion Class A-3 at AA (sf)
-- $1.0 billion Class A-4 at A (sf)
-- $1.0 billion Class A-5 at BBB (sf)
-- $24.3 million Class M-1 at A (sf)
-- $15.1 million Class M-2 at BBB (sf)
-- $9.7 million Class B-1 at BB (sf)
-- $9.7 million Class B-2 at B (sf)

The Class A-3, A-4, and A-5 Notes are exchangeable. These classes
can be exchanged for combinations of initial exchangeable notes as
specified in the offering documents.

The AAA (sf) ratings on the Notes reflect 10.55% of credit
enhancement provided by subordinated notes. The AA (sf), A (sf),
BBB (sf), BB (sf), and B (sf) ratings reflect 7.10%, 4.85%, 3.45%,
2.55%, and 1.65% of credit enhancement, respectively.

Other than the specified classes above, DBRS Morningstar does not
rate any other classes in this transaction.

This transaction is a securitization of a portfolio of seasoned
performing and reperforming, primarily first-lien residential
mortgages funded by the issuance of mortgage-backed notes (the
Notes). The Notes are backed by 7,143 loans with a total principal
balance of $1,138,897,045 as of the Cut-Off Date (June 30, 2022).

The portfolio is approximately 192 months seasoned and contains
70.5% modified loans. The modifications happened more than two
years ago for 67.1% of the modified loans. Within the pool, 1,545
mortgages have non-interest-bearing deferred amounts, which equate
to approximately 2.0% of the total principal balance. There are no
Government-Sponsored Enterprise (GSE) Home Affordable Modification
Program (HAMP) and proprietary principal forgiveness amounts
included in the deferred amounts.

As of the Cut-Off Date, 99.3% of the loans in the pool are current.
Approximately 0.7% of the pool are 30 days delinquent and five
loans are 60 days delinquent under the Mortgage Bankers Association
(MBA) delinquency method. Approximately 0.1% are in bankruptcy.
(All bankruptcy loans are performing.) Approximately 85.0% of the
mortgage loans have been zero times 30 days delinquent (0 x 30) for
at least the past 24 months under the MBA delinquency method.

The majority of the pool (99.6%) is exempt from the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Ability-to-Repay (ATR)/Qualified
Mortgage (QM) rules because the loans were originated prior to
January 10, 2014, the date on which the rules became applicable.
The loans subject to the ATR rules are designated as Non-QM
(0.4%).

The Mortgage Loan Sellers, Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company (GSMC;
99.8%) and MCLP Asset Company, Inc. (MCLP; 0.2%), acquired the
mortgage loans in various transactions prior to the Closing Date
from various mortgage loan sellers or from an affiliate. GS
Mortgage Securities Corp. (the Depositor) will contribute the loans
to the Trust. These loans were originated and previously serviced
by various entities through purchases in the secondary market.

The Sponsor, GSMC, or a majority-owned affiliate will retain an
eligible vertical interest in the transaction consisting of an
uncertificated interest (the Retained Interest) in the Trust
representing the right to receive at least 5.0% of the amounts
collected on the mortgage loans, net of the Trust's fees, expenses,
and reimbursements and paid on the Notes (other than the Class R
Notes) and the Retained Interest to satisfy the credit risk
retention requirements under Section 15G of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

As of the servicing transfer date (August 1, 2022), the mortgage
loans will be serviced by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS;
86.5%) and NewRez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing (SMS;
13.5%).

Unlike previous transactions from the GSMBS RPL shelf, which have a
fixed aggregate servicing fee rate percentage, the servicing fee
payable for GSMBS 2022-RPL3 will be calculated using a dollar
servicing fee construct. The monthly servicing fee charged per loan
will be determined based on the delinquency status of each mortgage
loan. In its analysis, DBRS Morningstar assumed an fixed aggregate
servicing fee rate higher than suggested by the dollar servicing
fee construct.

There will not be any advancing of delinquent principal or interest
on any mortgages by the Servicers or any other party to the
transaction; however, the Servicers are obligated to make advances
with respect to the preservation, inspection, restoration,
protection, and repair of a mortgaged property, which includes
delinquent tax and insurance payments, the enforcement or judicial
proceedings associated with a mortgage loan, and the management and
liquidation of properties (to the extent that the Servicer deems
such advances recoverable).

When the aggregate pool balance of the mortgage loans is reduced to
less than 25% of the Cut-Off Date balance, the Controlling
Noteholder will have the option to purchase all remaining loans and
other property of the Issuer at a specified minimum price. The
Controlling Noteholder will be the beneficial owner of more than
50% the Class B-5 Notes (if no longer outstanding the next most
subordinate Class of Notes, other than Class X).

As a loss mitigation alternative, the Controlling Noteholder may
direct the Servicers to sell mortgage loans that are in an early or
advanced stage of default or for which foreclosure or default is
imminent to unaffiliated third-party investors in the secondary
whole loan market on arms-length terms and at fair market value to
maximize proceeds on such loans on a net present value basis.

The transaction employs a sequential-pay cash flow structure.
Principal proceeds and excess interest can be used to cover
interest shortfalls on the Notes, but such shortfalls on the Class
M-1 Notes and more subordinate bonds will not be paid from
principal proceeds until the more senior classes are retired.
Excess interest can be used to amortize the principal of the notes
after paying transaction parties' fees, Net Weighted-Average Coupon
(WAC) shortfalls, and making deposits onto the breach reserve
account.

CORONAVIRUS DISEASE (COVID-19) IMPACT

The pandemic and the resulting isolation measures have caused an
immediate economic contraction, leading to sharp increases in
unemployment rates and income reductions for many consumers.
Shortly after the onset of the pandemic, DBRS Morningstar saw an
increase in delinquencies for many residential mortgage-backed
securities (RMBS) asset classes.

Such mortgage delinquencies were mostly in the form of
forbearances, which are generally short-term periods of payment
relief that may perform very differently from traditional
delinquencies. At the onset of the pandemic, the option to forbear
mortgage payments was widely available, driving forbearances to an
elevated level. When the dust settled, loans with
coronavirus-induced forbearance in 2020 performed better than
expected, thanks to government aid, low loan-to-value ratios
(LTVs), and acceptable underwriting in the mortgage market in
general. Across nearly all RMBS asset classes, delinquencies have
been gradually trending downward, as forbearance periods come to an
end for many borrowers.

As of the Cut-Off Date, there are 38 loans (0.6% of unpaid
principal balance) that are subject to an active
coronavirus-related forbearance plan with the servicers.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



GS MORTGAGE 2022-RPL3: Fitch Assigns Bsf Rating on Class B-2 Debt
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned the following ratings to GS
Mortgage-Backed Securities Trust 2022-RPL3 (GSMBS 2022-RPL3):

RATING ACTIONS

ENTITY/DEBT            RATING                       
   ----                ------                        

GSMBS 2022-RPL3

  A-1                   LT   AAAsf   New Rating

  A-2                   LT   AAsf    New Rating

  A-3                   LT   AAsf    New Rating

  A-4                   LT   Asf     New Rating

  A-5                   LT   BBBsf   New Rating

  M-1                   LT   Asf     New Rating

  M-2                   LT   BBBsf   New Rating

  B-1                   LT   BBsf    New Rating

  B-2                   LT   Bsf     New Rating

  B-3                   LT   NRsf    New Rating

  B-4                   LT   NRsf    New Rating

  B-5                   LT   NRsf    New Rating

  B                     LT   NRsf    New Rating

  PT                    LT   NRsf    New Rating

  SA                    LT   NRsf    New Rating
            
  X                     LT   NRsf    New Rating

  RISKRETEN             LT   NRsf    New Rating

  CERT                  LT   NRsf    New Rating

  R                     LT   NRsf    New Rating

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

The notes are supported by one collateral group that consists of
7,143 seasoned performing loans and reperforming loans (RPLs) with
a total balance of approximately $1.14 billion, which includes $23
million of the aggregate pool balance in non-interest-bearing
deferred principal amounts as of the cut-off date.

Distributions of P&I and loss allocations are based on a
traditional senior-subordinate, sequential structure. The
sequential-pay structure locks out principal to the subordinated
notes until the most senior notes outstanding are paid in full. The
servicers will not be advancing delinquent monthly payments of
P&I.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Updated Sustainable Home Prices (Negative): Due to Fitch's updated
view on sustainable home prices, Fitch views the home price values
of this pool as 9.1% below a long-term sustainable level (vs. 9.2%
on a national level as of April 2022, down 1.4% since last
quarter). Underlying fundamentals are not keeping pace with the
growth in prices, resulting from a supply/demand imbalance driven
by low inventory, favorable mortgage rates, and new buyers entering
the market. These trends have led to significant home price
increases over the past year, with home prices rising 18.9% yoy
nationally as of December 2021.

RPL Credit Quality (Mixed): The collateral consists of 7,143
seasoned performing and re-performing first and second lien loans,
totaling $1,139 million, and seasoned approximately 191 months in
aggregate. The pool is 99.3% current and 0.7% DQ. Over the last two
years 85% of loans have been clean current. Additionally, 70.5% of
loans have a prior modification. The borrowers have a strong)
credit profile (731 Fitch model FICO and 45% DTI) and low leverage
(52% sLTV). The pool consists of 98% of loans where the borrower
maintains a primary residence.

No Advancing (Mixed): The deal is structured to zero months of
servicer advances for delinquent principal and interest. The lack
of advancing reduces loss severities, as there is a lower amount
repaid to the servicer when a loan liquidates and liquidation
proceeds are prioritized to cover principal repayment over accrued
but unpaid interest. The downside to this is the additional stress
on the structure side, as there is limited liquidity in the event
of large and extended delinquencies.

Sequential Pay Structure (Positive): The transaction's cash flow is
based on a sequential-pay structure whereby the subordinate classes
do not receive principal until the senior classes are repaid in
full. Losses are allocated in reverse-sequential order.
Furthermore, the provision to re-allocate principal to pay interest
on the 'AAAsf' and 'AAsf' rated notes prior to other principal
distributions is highly supportive of timely interest payments to
those classes.

Representation Framework (Negative): The loan-level representations
and warranties (R&Ws) are consistent with a Tier 2 framework. The
tier assessment is based primarily on the inclusion of knowledge
qualifiers in the underlying reps, as well as a breach reserve
account that replaces the Sponsor's responsibility to cure any R&W
breaches following the established sunset period. Fitch increased
its loss expectations by 61bps at the 'AAAsf' rating category to
reflect both the limitations of the R&W framework as well as the
non-investment-grade counterparty risk of the provider.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- The defined negative rating sensitivity analysis demonstrates
    how the ratings would react to steeper MVDs at the national
    level. The analysis assumes MVDs of 10.0%, 20.0% and 30.0% in
    addition to the model projected 41% at 'AAA'.

-- The analysis indicates that there is some potential rating
    migration with higher MVDs for all rated classes, compared
    with the model projection. Specifically, a 10% additional
    decline in home prices would lower all rated classes by one
    full category.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- The defined positive rating sensitivity analysis demonstrates
    how the ratings would react to positive home price growth of
    10% with no assumed overvaluation.

-- Excluding the senior class, which is already rated 'AAAsf',
    the analysis indicates there is potential positive rating  
    migration for all of the rated classes.

-- Specifically, a 10% gain in home prices would result in a full

    category upgrade for the rated class excluding those assigned
    'AAAsf' ratings.

This section provides insight into the model-implied sensitivities
the transaction faces when one assumption is modified, while
holding others equal. The modeling process uses the modification of
these variables to reflect asset performance in up- and down
environments. The results should only be considered as one
potential outcome, as the transaction is exposed to multiple
dynamic risk factors. It should not be used as an indicator of
possible future performance.


HAWAII HOTEL 2019-MAUI: DBRS Hikes Class G Certs Rating to B
------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited upgraded its ratings on three classes of Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2019-MAUI issued by
Hawaii Hotel Trust 2019-MAUI as follows:

-- Class F to BB (low) (sf) from B (high) (sf)
-- Class G to B (sf) from B (low) (sf)
-- Class HRR to B (low) (sf) from CCC (sf)

In addition, DBRS Morningstar confirmed the following ratings:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (high) (sf)
-- Class C at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class D at A (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)

DBRS Morningstar changed the trends on Classes F and G to Stable
from Negative. DBRS Morningstar also assigned a Stable trend to
Class HRR with the upgrade to B (low) (sf). All remaining classes
have Stable trends.

During DBRS Morningstar's last review of the transaction, the
Negative trends on Classes F and G reflected the underlying
pressures and lasting residual effects of the Coronavirus Disease
(COVID-19) global pandemic, which have been significantly reduced
over the past year as Hawaiian tourism rates have been rebounding.
As such, the underlying collateral has reported a substantial
increase in net cash flow (NCF) and performance metrics in 2021,
which supports the rating confirmations, upgrades, and trend
changes.

The collateral for the Certificates is a $650.0 million mortgage
loan, which is secured by the borrower's fee-simple interest in the
Four Seasons-branded luxury, five-star resort hotel in Wailea,
Hawaii. The full-service luxury hotel features 383 guest rooms,
with four food and beverage offerings, specialty retail shops, and
38,000 square feet of meeting space. The hotel operates under the
Four Seasons flag via an agreement that expires in February 2025,
and benefits from its luxury quality, strong brand affiliation, and
a wide range of amenities, including a spa, three outdoor pools,
tennis courts, a games room and fitness center, and preferred
access to the 54-hole Wailea Golf Club directly across Wailea
Alanui Drive from the hotel. The hotel also offers direct access to
Wailea Beach as well as stunning views of the island's volcanic
mountains and westward to the bay and Pacific Ocean. Wailea has one
of the highest barriers to entry of any resort market in the world.
Available sites are extremely rare or nonexistent, and zoning is
complex and protective.

Because of the very low demand brought on by the pandemic, the
property was temporarily closed between April 2020 and December
2020, which resulted in a negative cash flow in year-end (YE) 2020.
Demand has since largely come back, however, and according to a
Skift article, dated July 11, 2022, there were over 776,000
visitors to the Islands in May 2022, which is a 92% recovery from
May 2019, as stated by the Hawaiian Tourism Authority.

According to the YE2021 financials, the hotel has benefited from
these trends and has shown significant performance improvements,
reporting an NCF of $56.2 million, an increase from the YE2020 and
issuance figures of -$20.4 million and $48.3 million, respectively.
The year-over-year increase is predominately due to an increase in
occupancy rate from 28.3% as of YE2020 to 63.5% as of YE2021. As
such, the loan was removed from the servicer's watchlist in May
2022, and is no longer cash managed after achieving a debt yield of
8.6% as of YE2021, surpassing the required debt yield threshold of
6.0%. During the same time period, the borrower also exercised its
second of five one-year extension options, extending the maturity
to May 2023. Additionally, according to the most recent STR report,
as of the trailing-28 days (T-28) through August 7, 2021, the
property reported an occupancy, average daily rate (ADR), and
revenue per available room (RevPAR) of 83.3% , $1,502, and $1,252,
respectively, with a RevPAR penetration rate of 175.7% for the same
period.

In comparison to the DBRS Morningstar NCF of $44.0 million derived
when ratings were assigned in 2020, the loan's YE2021 NCF of $56.2
million has greatly exceeded expectations, primarily because of
higher-than-expected departmental revenue. With Hawaii tourism
returning close to pre-pandemic levels, the property's T-28 through
August 2021 ADR and RevPAR figures have surpassed the DBRS
Morningstar figures of $960 and $812, respectively. DBRS
Morningstar expects performance to remain strong in 2022, in line
with 2021 and pre-pandemic performance, therefore supporting the
rating upgrades.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



HOMEWARD 2022-1: DBRS Gives Prov. B(low) Rating on Class B-2 Certs
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2022-1 to be issued by Homeward
Opportunities Fund Trust 2022-1 (the Trust):

-- $224.7 million Class A-1 at AAA (sf)
-- $22.6 million Class A-2 at A (high) (sf)
-- $38.5 million Class A-3 at A (sf)
-- $22.4 million Class M-1 at BBB (sf)
-- $17.4 million Class B-1 at BB (low) (sf)
-- $17.1 million Class B-2 at B (low) (sf)

Other than the specified classes above, DBRS Morningstar does not
rate any other classes in this transaction.

The AAA (sf) rating on the Class A-1 Certificates reflects 36.75%
of credit enhancement provided by subordinated Certificates. The A
(high) (sf), A (sf), BBB (sf), BB (low) (sf), and B (low) (sf)
ratings reflect 30.40%, 19.55%, 13.25%, 8.35%, and 3.55% of credit
enhancement, respectively.

This transaction is a securitization of a portfolio of fixed- and
adjustable-rate prime, expanded prime, and nonprime first-lien
residential mortgages to be funded by the issuance of the
Certificates. The Certificates are backed by 757 mortgage loans
with a total principal balance of $355,213,2781 as of the Cut-Off
Date (July 1, 2022).

The originators for the mortgage pool are Roc Capital Holdings LLC
(25.5%), RF Renovo Management Company, LLC (24.2%), 5th Street
Capital (16.4%), Logan Finance Corp. (16.0%), and other
originators, each comprising less than 15.0% of the mortgage loans.
Fay Servicing, LLC (39.6%), Specialized Loan Servicing LLC (36.3%),
and RF Mortgage Services Corporation (24.1%) will service the loans
within the pool as of the Closing Date.

The Servicers will generally fund advances of delinquent principal
and interest (P&I) on any mortgage until such loan becomes 90 days
delinquent, contingent upon recoverability determination. Each
Servicer is also obligated to make advances in respect of taxes,
insurance premiums, and reasonable costs incurred in the course of
servicing and disposing of properties (Servicing Advances). The
Servicers will not advance P&I for the payments forborne on the
loans where the borrower has been granted forbearance or similar
loss mitigation in response to the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)
pandemic or otherwise. However, the Servicers will be required to
make P&I advances for any delinquent payments due after the end of
the related forbearance period. If the applicable Servicer fails to
make a required P&I advance, the Master Servicer will fund such P&I
advance until it is deemed unrecoverable.

Although the mortgage loans, except for the business-purpose
investor loans, were originated to satisfy the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau's Qualified Mortgage (QM) and Ability-to-Repay
(ATR) rules, they were made to borrowers who generally do not
qualify for agency, government, or private-label nonagency prime
jumbo products for various reasons. In accordance with the QM/ATR
rules, 22.6% of the loans are designated as non-QM. Approximately
77.4% of the loans are made to investors for business purposes and,
hence, are not subject to the QM/ATR rules.

Homeward Opportunities Fund LP (HOF) is the Sponsor, the initial
Controlling Holder, and the Servicing Administrator of the
transaction. HOF Asset Selector LLC serves as the Asset Selector
for securitizations sponsored by HOF and, for this transaction,
determined which mortgage loans would be included in the pool. The
Sponsor, Depositor, Asset Selector, and Servicing Administrator are
affiliates of the same entity.

Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (rated BBB with a Stable trend by
DBRS Morningstar) will act as the Master Servicer. U.S. Bank Trust
Company, National Association (rated AA (high) with a Stable trend
by DBRS Morningstar) will serve as Trustee, Securities
Administrator, Certificate Registrar, and Custodian.

The Sponsor, directly or indirectly through a majority-owned
affiliate, will retain an eligible horizontal residual interest in
at least 5% of the Certificates (the Class B-2, B-3, and X
Certificates) issued by the Issuer to satisfy the credit
risk-retention requirements under Section 15G of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

On or after the earlier of (1) the Distribution date occurring in
August 2025 or (2) the date when the aggregate stated principal
balance of the mortgage loans is reduced to 30% of the Cut-Off Date
balance, the Depositor has the option to purchase all outstanding
certificates at a price equal to the outstanding class balance plus
accrued and unpaid interest, including any cap carryover amounts.
After such purchase, the Depositor then has the option to complete
a qualified liquidation, which requires (1) a complete liquidation
of assets within the Trust and (2) proceeds to be distributed to
the appropriate holders of regular or residual interests.

The Sponsor will have the option, but not the obligation, to
repurchase any mortgage loan (other than loans under forbearance
plan as of the Closing Date) that becomes 90 or more days
delinquent or are in real estate owned at the repurchase price (par
plus interest), provided that such repurchases in aggregate do not
exceed 10% of the total principal balance as of the Cut-Off Date.

The transaction employs a sequential-pay cash flow structure with a
pro rata principal distribution among the senior classes (Classes
A-1, A-2, and A-3) subject to certain performance triggers related
to cumulative losses or delinquencies exceeding a specified
threshold (Trigger Event). After a Trigger Event, principal
proceeds can be used to cover interest shortfalls on the Class A-1
certificates before being applied sequentially to amortize the
balances of the certificates. For all other classes, principal
proceeds can be used to cover interest shortfalls after the more
senior tranches are paid in full (IPIP).

Excess spread can be used to cover realized losses before being
allocated to unpaid Cap Carryover Amounts due to Class A-1 down to
Class A-3. Of note, P&I otherwise available to pay the Class B-3
interest and interest shortfalls may be used to pay the Class A Cap
Carryover amounts. In addition, the Class A-1, A-2, and A-3 coupons
step up by 1.00% after the payment date in August 2026 (step-up
date). Also, the interest rate on Class B-2 drops to 0.00% from the
Net Weighted-Average Coupon Rate on the step-up date, which helps
to increase the amount of interest available to pay the stepped-up
coupon on the Class A-1, A-2, and A-3 Certificates.

Coronavirus Impact

The coronavirus pandemic and the resulting isolation measures
caused an immediate economic contraction, leading to sharp
increases in unemployment rates and income reductions for many
consumers. Shortly after the onset of the coronavirus, DBRS
Morningstar saw an increase in the delinquencies for many
residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) asset classes.

Such mortgage delinquencies were mostly in the form of
forbearances, which are generally short-term periods of payment
relief that may perform very differently from traditional
delinquencies. At the onset of the coronavirus, the option to
forbear mortgage payments was widely available, driving
forbearances to an elevated level. When the dust settled, loans
with coronavirus-induced forbearance in 2020 performed better than
expected, thanks to government aid, low loan-to-value ratios, and
acceptable underwriting in the mortgage market in general. Across
nearly all RMBS asset classes in recent months, delinquencies have
been gradually trending downward, as forbearance periods come to an
end for many borrowers.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.


JP MORGAN 2022-8: Fitch Gives Final B-sf Ratings on Class B5 Debt
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned final ratings to JP Morgan Mortgage
Trust 2022-8 (JPMMT 2022-8).

RATING ACTIONS

ENTITY/DEBT       RATING                        PRIOR
   ----           ------                        -----
JPMMT 2022-8

  A-1             LT   AAsf   New Rating        AA(EXP)sf

  A-2             LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-3             LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-4             LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-4-A           LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-4-X           LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-5             LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-5-A           LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-5-X           LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-6             LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf
   
  A-6-A           LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-6-X           LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-7             LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-7-A           LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-7-X           LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-8             LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-8-A           LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-8-X           LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-9             LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-9-A           LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-9-X           LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-10            LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-10-A          LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-10-X          LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-11            LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-11-A          LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-11-X          LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-12            LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-12-A          LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-12-X          LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-13            LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-13-A          LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-13-X          LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-14            LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-14-A          LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-14-X          LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-15            LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-15-A          LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-15-X          LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-16            LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-16-A          LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-16-X          LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf
  
  A-17            LT   AAsf   New Rating        AA(EXP)sf

  A-17-A          LT   AAsf   New Rating        AA(EXP)sf

  A-18            LT   AAsf   New Rating        AA(EXP)sf

  A-18-A          LT   AAsf   New Rating        AA(EXP)sf

  A-19            LT   AAsf   New Rating        AA(EXP)sf

  A-19-A          LT   AAsf   New Rating        AA(EXP)sf

  A-X-1           LT   AAsf   New Rating        AA(EXP)sf

  A-X-2           LT   AAAsf  New Rating        AAA(EXP)sf

  A-X-3           LT   AAsf   New Rating        AA(EXP)sf

  A-X-3-A         LT   AAsf   New Rating        AA(EXP)sf

  A-X-3-B         LT   AAsf   New Rating        AA(EXP)sf

  B-1             LT   AA-sf  New Rating        AA-(EXP)sf

  B-2             LT   A-sf   New Rating        A-(EXP)sf

  B-3             LT   BBB-sf New Rating        BBB-(EXP)sf

  B-4             LT   BB-sf  New Rating        BB-(EXP)sf

  B-5             LT   B-sf   New Rating        B-(EXP)sf

  B-6             LT   NRsf   New Rating        NR(EXP)sf

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

Fitch has assigned final ratings to the residential mortgage-backed
certificates issued by J.P. Morgan Mortgage Trust 2022-8 (JPMMT
2022-8) as indicated. The certificates are supported by 343 loans
with a total balance of approximately $386.29 million as of the
cutoff date. The pool consists of prime-quality fixed-rate
mortgages from various mortgage originators.

The pool consists of loans originated by United Wholesale Mortgage,
LLC (53.2%), loanDepot.com, LLC (11.7%) and Fairway Independent
Mortgage Corp. (10.4%), with the remaining 24.7% of the loans
originated by various originators, each contributing less than 10%
to the pool. However, in Fitch's analysis Fitch considered 52.4% of
the loans originated by United Wholesale Mortgage, 11.7% by
loanDepot.com, 10.4% by Fairway Independent Mortgage Corp and 25.5%
by various originators.

The loan-level representations and warranties are provided by the
various originators or Maxex (aggregator).

NewRez LLC (f/k/a New Penn Financial, LLC), d/b/a Shellpoint
Mortgage Servicing (Shellpoint), will act as interim servicer for
approximately 35.1% of the pool from the closing date until the
servicing transfer date (35.9% as determined by Fitch), which is
expected to occur on or about Oct. 1, 2022. After the servicing
transfer date, these mortgage loans will be serviced by JPMorgan
Chase Bank, National Association (Chase).

Since Chase will service these loans after the transfer date, Fitch
performed its analysis assuming Chase is the servicer for these
loans. Other servicers in the transaction include United Wholesale
Mortgage, LLC (servicing 53.2% of the loans [52.4% of the loans as
determined by Fitch]), and loanDepot.com, LLC (servicing 11.7% of
the loans). Nationstar Mortgage LLC (Nationstar) will be the master
servicer.

99.6% of the loans qualify as safe-harbor qualified mortgage
(SHQM), or QM safe-harbor (average prime offer rate [APOR]) and
0.4% of the loans were designated as rebuttable presumption QM.

There is no exposure to LIBOR in this transaction. The collateral
comprises 100% fixed-rate loans, and the certificates are
fixed-rate and capped at the net weighted average coupon (WAC) or
based on the net WAC.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Updated Sustainable Home Prices (Negative): Due to Fitch's updated
view on sustainable home prices, Fitch views the home price values
of this pool as 9.9% above a long-term sustainable level (versus
9.2% on a national level as of April 2022, down 1.4% since 1Q22).
Underlying fundamentals are not keeping pace with growth in prices,
resulting from a supply/demand imbalance driven by low inventory,
favorable mortgage rates and new buyers entering the market. These
trends have led to significant home price increases over the past
year, with home prices rising 18.2% yoy nationally as of December
2021.

High Quality Mortgage Pool (Positive): The pool consists of high
quality, fixed-rate, fully amortizing loans with maturities of up
to 30 years. 99.6% of the loans qualify as SHQM, or QM safe-harbor
(APOR) and 0.4% of the loans were designated as rebuttable
presumption QM. The loans were made to borrowers with strong credit
profiles, relatively low leverage and large liquid reserves.

The loans are seasoned at an average of five months, according to
Fitch (three months per the transaction documents). The pool has a
WA original FICO score of 759, as determined by Fitch, which is
indicative of very high credit quality borrowers. Approximately
65.5% (as determined by Fitch) of the loans have a borrower with an
original FICO score equal to or above 750. In addition, the
original WA combined loan-to-value (CLTV) ratio of 74.6%,
translating to a sustainable LTV (sLTV) ratio of 81.7%, represents
substantial borrower equity in the property and reduced default
risk.

A 97.2% portion of the pool comprises nonconforming loans, while
the remaining 2.8% represents conforming loans. All of the loans
are designated as QM loans, with 46.6% of the pool originated by a
retail and correspondent channel.

Of the pool, 100.0% comprises loans where the borrower maintains a
primary or secondary residence. Single-family homes, planned unit
developments (PUDs), and single-family attached dwellings
constitute 95.1% of the pool; condominiums make up 3.9%; and
multifamily homes make up 1.0%. The pool consists of loans with the
following loan purposes: purchases (73.6%), cash-out refinances
(21.8%) and rate-term refinances (4.6%).

A total of 178 loans in the pool are over $1.0 million, and the
largest loan is approximately $3.00 million. Fitch determined that
none of the loans were made to nonpermanent residents.

Geographic Concentration (Negative): Of the pool, 46.5% is
concentrated in California. The largest MSA concentration is in the
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA MSA (19.0%), followed by the
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA MSA (6.7%) and the San
Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA MSA (6.2%). The top three MSAs
account for 32% of the pool. As a result, there was a 1.004x
probability of default (PD) penalty applied for geographic
concentration which increased the loss expectation at the 'AAAsf'
level by 0.03%.

Shifting-Interest Structure with Full Advancing (Mixed): The
mortgage cash flow and loss allocation are based on a
senior-subordinate, shifting-interest structure whereby the
subordinate classes receive only scheduled principal and are locked
out from receiving unscheduled principal or prepayments for five
years. The lockout feature helps to maintain subordination for a
longer period should losses occur later in the life of the
transaction. The applicable credit support percentage feature
redirects subordinate principal to classes of higher seniority if
specified credit enhancement (CE) levels are not maintained.

The servicers will provide full advancing for the life of the
transaction; each servicer is expected to advance delinquent P&I on
loans that enter into a coronavirus pandemic-related forbearance
plan. Although full P&I advancing will provide liquidity to the
certificates, it will also increase the loan-level loss severity
(LS) since the servicer looks to recoup P&I advances from
liquidation proceeds, which results in less recoveries.

Nationstar is the master servicer and will advance if the servicer
is unable to do so. If the master servicer is unable to advance,
then the securities administrator (Citibank) will advance.

CE Floor (Positive): A CE or senior subordination floor of 2.60%
has been considered to mitigate potential tail-end risk and loss
exposure for senior tranches as the pool size declines and
performance volatility increases due to adverse loan selection and
small loan count concentration. Additionally, a junior
subordination floor of 1.80% has been considered to mitigate
potential tail-end risk and loss exposure for subordinate tranches
as the pool size declines and performance volatility increases due
to adverse loan selection and small loan count concentration.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

Fitch incorporates a sensitivity analysis to demonstrate how the
ratings would react to steeper market value declines (MVDs) than
assumed at the MSA level. Sensitivity analyses was conducted at the
state and national levels to assess the effect of higher MVDs for
the subject pool as well as lower MVDs, illustrated by a gain in
home prices.

-- This defined negative rating sensitivity analysis demonstrates

    how the ratings would react to steeper MVDs at the national
    level.

-- The analysis assumes MVDs of 10.0%, 20.0% and 30.0% in
    addition to the model-projected 41.4% at 'AAA'.

-- The analysis indicates that there is some potential rating
    migration with higher MVDs for all rated classes, compared
    with the model projection. Specifically, a 10% additional
    decline in home prices would lower all rated classes by one
    full category.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

Fitch incorporates a sensitivity analysis to demonstrate how the
ratings would react to steeper MVDs than assumed at the MSA level.
Sensitivity analyses was conducted at the state and national levels
to assess the effect of higher MVDs for the subject pool as well as
lower MVDs, illustrated by a gain in home prices.

-- This defined positive rating sensitivity analysis demonstrates

    how the ratings would react to positive home price growth of
    10% with no assumed overvaluation.

-- Excluding the senior class, which is already rated 'AAAsf',
    the analysis indicates there is potential positive rating
    migration for all of the rated classes.

-- Specifically, a 10% gain in home prices would result in a full

    category upgrade for the rated class excluding those being
    assigned ratings of 'AAAsf'.

This section provides insight into the model-implied sensitivities
the transaction faces when one assumption is modified, while
holding others equal. The modeling process uses the modification of
these variables to reflect asset performance in up and down
environments. The results should only be considered as one
potential outcome, as the transaction is exposed to multiple
dynamic risk factors. It should not be used as an indicator of
possible future performance.

DATA ADEQUACY

Fitch relied on an independent third-party due diligence review
performed on 100% of the pool. The third-party due diligence was
generally consistent with Fitch's "U.S. RMBS Rating Criteria."
SitusAMC, Clayton, and Opus were engaged to perform the review.
Loans reviewed under this engagement were given compliance, credit
and valuation grades and assigned initial grades for each
subcategory. Minimal exceptions and waivers were noted in the due
diligence reports. Refer to the "Third-Party Due Diligence" section
for more detail.

Fitch also utilized data files provided by the issuer on its SEC
Rule 17g-5 designated website. Fitch received loan level
information based on the ResiPLS data layout format, and the data
are considered comprehensive. The data contained in the ResiPLS
layout data tape were reviewed by the due diligence companies, and
no material discrepancies were noted.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

JPMMT 2022-8 has an ESG Relevance Score of '4+' for Transaction
Parties and Operational Risk. Operational risk is well controlled
for in JPMMT 2022-8, including strong transaction due diligence, an
'Above Average' aggregator and the majority of the pool originated
by an 'Above Average' originator, which results in a reduction in
expected losses and is relevant to the rating.

Although this transaction has loans that were purchased in
connection with the sponsor's Elevate Diversity and Inclusion
program or the sponsor's Clean Energy program, Fitch did not take
these programs into consideration when assigning an ESG Relevance
Score, as the programs did not directly affect the expected losses
assigned or were not relevant to the rating, in Fitch's view.

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


MADISON PARK LV: Moody's Assigns (P)B3 Rating to $500K Cl. F Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned provisional ratings to two
classes of notes to be issued by Madison Park Funding LV, Ltd. (the
"Issuer" or "Madison Park Funding LV").

Moody's rating action is as follows:

-- US$360,000,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Senior Notes due 2035,
    Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

-- US$500,000 Class F Deferrable Floating Rate Junior Notes due
    2035, Assigned (P)B3 (sf)

The notes listed are referred to herein, collectively, as the
"Rated Notes."

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on Moody's methodology and
considers all relevant risks, particularly those associated with
the CLO's portfolio and structure.

Madison Park Funding LV is a managed cash flow CLO. The issued
notes will be collateralized primarily by broadly syndicated senior
secured corporate loans. At least 90% of the portfolio must consist
of senior secured loans, and up to 10% of the portfolio may consist
of assets that are not senior secured loans. Moody's expect the
portfolio to be approximately 80% ramped as of the closing date.

Credit Suisse Asset Management, LLC (the "Manager") will direct the
selection, acquisition and disposition of the assets on behalf of
the Issuer and may engage in trading activity, including
discretionary trading, during the transaction's five year
reinvestment period. Thereafter, subject to certain restrictions,
the Manager may reinvest unscheduled principal payments and
proceeds from sales of credit risk assets.

In addition to the Rated Notes, the Issuer will issue seven other
classes of secured notes and one class of subordinated notes.

The transaction incorporates interest and par coverage tests which,
if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to pay down
the notes in order of seniority.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in Section 2.3.2.1
of the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan
Obligations" rating methodology published in December 2021.

For modeling purposes, Moody's used the following base-case
assumptions:

Par amount: $600,000,000

Diversity Score: 70

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 3029

Weighted Average Spread (WAS): SOFR + 3.60%

Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 7.00%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 47.00%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 8.04 years

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2021.

Factors That Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the Rated Notes is subject to uncertainty. The
performance of the Rated Notes is sensitive to the performance of
the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. The Manager's investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
performance of the Rated Notes.


MADISON PARK LV: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to $500,000 Cl. F Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned ratings to two classes of
notes issued by Madison Park Funding LV, Ltd. (the "Issuer" or
"Madison Park Funding LV").

Moody's rating action is as follows:

  US$360,000,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Senior Notes
  due 2035, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

  US$500,000 Class F Deferrable Floating Rate Junior
  Notes due 2035, Definitive Rating Assigned B3 (sf)

The notes listed are referred to herein, collectively, as the
"Rated Notes."

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on Moody's methodology and
considers all relevant risks, particularly those associated with
the CLO's portfolio and structure.

Madison Park Funding LV is a managed cash flow CLO. The issued
notes will be collateralized primarily by broadly syndicated senior
secured corporate loans. At least 90% of the portfolio must consist
of senior secured loans, and up to 10% of the portfolio may consist
of assets that are not senior secured loans. The portfolio is
approximately 80% ramped as of the closing date.

Credit Suisse Asset Management, LLC (the "Manager") will direct the
selection, acquisition and disposition of the assets on behalf of
the Issuer and may engage in trading activity, including
discretionary trading, during the transaction's five year
reinvestment period. Thereafter, subject to certain restrictions,
the Manager may reinvest unscheduled principal payments and
proceeds from sales of credit risk assets.

In addition to the Rated Notes, the Issuer issued seven other
classes of secured notes and one class of subordinated notes.

The transaction incorporates interest and par coverage tests which,
if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to pay down
the notes in order of seniority.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in Section 2.3.2.1
of the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan
Obligations" rating methodology published in December 2021.

For modeling purposes, Moody's used the following base-case
assumptions:

Par amount: $600,000,000

Diversity Score: 70

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 3029

Weighted Average Spread (WAS): SOFR + 3.60%

Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 7.00%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 47.00%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 8.04 years

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2021.

Factors That Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the Rated Notes is subject to uncertainty. The
performance of the Rated Notes is sensitive to the performance of
the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. The Manager's investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
performance of the Rated Notes.


MF1 2022-FL10 LLC: DBRS Finalizes B(low) Rating on 3 Classes Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. finalized its provisional ratings on the following
classes of notes issued by MF1 2022-FL10 LLC (the Issuer or the
Trust):

-- Class A Notes at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S Notes at AAA (sf)
-- Class B Notes at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C Notes at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D Notes at BBB (sf)
-- Class E Notes at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F Notes at BB (high) (sf)
-- Class F-E Notes at BB (high) (sf)
-- Class F-X Notes at BB (high) (sf)
-- Class G Notes at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class G-E Notes at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class G-X Notes at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class H Notes at B (low) (sf)
-- Class H-E Notes at B (low) (sf)
-- Class H-X Notes at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The initial collateral consists of 24 floating-rate mortgage loans
secured by 34 transitional multifamily and manufactured housing
properties, totaling $979.18 million (44.5% of the total fully
funded balance), excluding $306.65 million (13.9% of the total
fully funded balance) of future funding commitments and $915.93
million (41.6% of the total fully funded balance) of pari passu
debt. Two loans, Gardenhouse and Poth Brewery, representing 9.0% of
the total trust balance, are delayed-close collateral interests,
which are identified in the data tape and included in the DBRS
Morningstar analysis. The issuer has 45 days post-closing to
acquire the delayed-close collateral interests. If a delayed-close
collateral interest is not expected to close or fund prior to the
purchase termination date, the Issuer may acquire any delayed-close
collateral interest during the ramp-up acquisition period. Any
amounts remaining in the unused proceeds account after the ramp-up
completion date up to $5.0 million will be deposited into the
reinvestment account. Any funds in excess of $5.0 million will be
transferred to the payment account and applied as principal
proceeds in accordance with the priority of payments.

The managed transaction includes a 24-month reinvestment period. As
part of the reinvestment period, the transaction includes a 120-day
ramp-up acquisition period that will be used to increase the trust
balance by $45,824,087 to a total target collateral principal
balance of $1,025,000,000. DBRS Morningstar assessed the ramp loans
using a conservative pool construct and, as a result, the ramp
loans have expected losses above the pool WA loan expected loss.
Reinvestment of principal proceeds during the reinvestment period
is subject to eligibility criteria, which, among other criteria,
includes a no-downgrade Rating Agency Confirmation (RAC) by DBRS
Morningstar for all new collateral interests and funded companion
participations. The eligibility criteria indicates that future
collateral interests can be secured only by multifamily,
manufactured housing, and student housing property types during the
stated ramp-up acquisition period. Additionally, the eligibility
criteria establishes minimum debt service coverage ratio,
loan-to-value ratio, and Herfindahl scores. Furthermore, certain
events within the transaction require the Issuer to obtain RAC.
DBRS Morningstar will confirm that a proposed action or failure to
act or other specified event will not, in and of itself, result in
the downgrade or withdrawal of the current rating. The Issuer is
required to obtain RAC for acquisitions of all collateral
interests.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



MFA 2022-INV2: DBRS Finalizes B Rating on Class B-2 Certs
---------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. finalized provisional ratings on the Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2022-INV2 issued by MFA 2022-INV2
Trust (the Issuer) as follows:

-- $121.4 million Class A-1 at AAA (sf)
-- $22.2 million Class A-2 at AA (high) (sf)
-- $25.5 million Class A-3 at A (high) (sf)
-- $14.8 million Class M-1 at BBB (sf)
-- $10.2 million Class B-1 at BB (sf)
-- $7.8 million Class B-2 at B (sf)

Other than the specified classes above, DBRS Morningstar does not
rate any other classes in this transaction.

The AAA (sf) rating on the Class A-1 certificates reflects 43.40%
of credit enhancement provided by subordinate certificates. The AA
(high) (sf), A (high) (sf), BBB (sf), BB (sf), and B (sf) ratings
reflect 33.05%, 21.15%, 14.25%, 9.50%, and 5.85% of credit
enhancement, respectively.

This transaction is a securitization of a portfolio of fixed- and
adjustable-rate investor debt service coverage ratio (DSCR),
first-lien residential mortgages funded by the issuance of the
Certificates. The Certificates are backed by 888 mortgage loans
with a total principal balance of $214,451,329 as of the Cut-Off
Date (June 30, 2022).

The originator and servicer for the whole mortgage pool is Lima One
Capital, LLC (Lima One or the Company). MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA)
is the Sponsor and the Servicing Administrator of the transaction.

The mortgage loans were underwritten to program guidelines for
business-purpose loans that are designed to rely on property value,
the mortgagor's credit profile, and the DSCR, where applicable.
Because the loans were made to investors for business purposes,
they are exempt from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's
Ability-to-Repay (ATR) rules and TILA/RESPA Integrated Disclosure
rule.

The Sponsor and Servicing Administrator are the same entity, and
the Depositor is its affiliate. The initial Controlling Holder is
expected to be the Depositor. The Depositor will retain an eligible
horizontal interest consisting of the Class B-3 and XS certificates
representing at least 5% of the aggregate fair value of the
Certificates to satisfy the credit risk-retention requirements
under Section 15G of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
regulations promulgated thereunder. Such retention aligns Sponsor
and investor interest in the capital structure. Additionally, the
Depositor will initially own the Class B-2 and Class A-IO-S
certificates.

Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (Computershare; rated BBB with a
Stable trend by DBRS Morningstar) will act as the Securities
Administrator and Certificate Registrar. Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company, Computershare, and Wilmington Trust, National
Association will act as the Custodians.

On or after the earlier of (1) the third anniversary of the Closing
Date or (2) the date when the aggregate unpaid principal balance
(UPB) of the mortgage loans is reduced to 30% of the Cut-Off Date
balance, the Depositor, at its option, may redeem all of the
outstanding certificates at a price equal to the class balances of
the related certificates plus accrued and unpaid interest,
including any Cap Carryover Amounts, and any postclosing deferred
amounts due to the Class XS certificates (optional redemption).
After such purchase, the Depositor may complete a qualified
liquidation, which requires (1) a complete liquidation of assets
within the trust and (2) proceeds to be distributed to the
appropriate holders of regular or residual interests.

On any date following the date on which the aggregate UPB of the
mortgage loans is less than or equal to 10% of the Cut-Off Date
balance, the Servicing Administrator will have the option to
terminate the transaction by purchasing all of the mortgage loans
and any real estate owned (REO) property from the Issuer at a price
equal to the sum of the aggregate UPB of the mortgage loans (other
than any REO property) plus accrued interest thereon, the lesser of
the fair market value of any REO property and the stated principal
balance of the related loan, and any outstanding and unreimbursed
servicing advances, accrued and unpaid fees, any preclosing
deferred amounts, and expenses that are payable or reimbursable to
the transaction parties (optional termination). An optional
termination is conducted as a qualified liquidation.

For this transaction, the Servicer or any other transaction party
will not fund advances on delinquent principal and interest (P&I)
on any mortgage. However, the Servicer is obligated to make
advances in respect of taxes, insurance premiums, and reasonable
costs incurred in the course of servicing and disposing of
properties (servicing advances).

The transaction employs a sequential-pay cash flow structure with a
pro rata principal distribution among the Class A-1, A-2, and A-3
Notes (Senior Classes) subject to certain performance triggers
related to cumulative losses or delinquencies exceeding a specified
threshold (Trigger Event). Principal proceeds can be used to cover
interest shortfalls on the Class A-1 and Class A-2 Notes (IIPP)
before being applied sequentially to amortize the balances of the
senior and subordinated bonds after a Trigger Event has occurred.
For the Class A-3 Notes (only after a Trigger Event) and for the
mezzanine and subordinate classes of Notes (both before and after a
Trigger Event), principal proceeds will be available to cover
interest shortfalls only after the more senior classes have been
paid off in full. The excess spread can be used to cover (1)
realized losses and (2) cumulative applied realized loss amounts
preceding the allocation of funds to unpaid Cap Carryover Amounts
due to Class A-1 down to Class M-1.

Coronavirus Impact

The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and the resulting
isolation measures have caused an immediate economic contraction,
leading to sharp increases in unemployment rates and income
reductions for many consumers. Shortly after the onset of the
pandemic, DBRS Morningstar saw an increase in delinquencies for
many residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) asset classes.

Such mortgage delinquencies were mostly in the form of
forbearances, which are generally short-term periods of payment
relief that may perform very differently from traditional
delinquencies. At the onset of the pandemic, the option to forbear
mortgage payments was widely available, driving forbearances to an
elevated level. When the dust settled, loans with
coronavirus-induced forbearance in 2020 performed better than
expected, thanks to government aid, low loan-to-value ratios, and
acceptable underwriting in the mortgage market in general. Across
nearly all RMBS asset classes, delinquencies have been gradually
trending downward, as forbearance periods come to an end for many
borrowers.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



MORGAN STANLEY 2013-C11: Moody's Cuts Cl. A-S Certs Rating to Ba2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed the ratings on eleven
classes and downgraded the rating on one class in Morgan Stanley
Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C11 ("MSBAM 2013-C11"),
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates as follows:

Cl. A-AB, Affirmed Aaa (sf); previously on Aug 10, 2021 Confirmed
at Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-3, Affirmed Aa2 (sf); previously on Aug 10, 2021 Downgraded
to Aa2 (sf)

Cl. A-4, Affirmed Aa2 (sf); previously on Aug 10, 2021 Downgraded
to Aa2 (sf)

Cl. A-S, Downgraded to Ba2 (sf); previously on Aug 10, 2021
Downgraded to Baa3 (sf)

Cl. B, Affirmed Caa2 (sf); previously on Aug 10, 2021 Downgraded to
Caa2 (sf)

Cl. C, Affirmed Caa3 (sf); previously on Aug 10, 2021 Confirmed at
Caa3 (sf)

Cl. D, Affirmed C (sf); previously on Aug 10, 2021 Affirmed C (sf)

Cl. E, Affirmed C (sf); previously on Aug 10, 2021 Affirmed C (sf)

Cl. F, Affirmed C (sf); previously on Aug 10, 2021 Affirmed C (sf)

Cl. G, Affirmed C (sf); previously on Aug 10, 2021 Affirmed C (sf)

Cl. PST, Affirmed Caa1 (sf); previously on Aug 10, 2021 Downgraded
to Caa1 (sf)

Cl. X-A*, Affirmed Aa2 (sf); previously on Aug 10, 2021 Downgraded
to Aa2 (sf)

*  Reflects Interest-Only Classes

RATINGS RATIONALE

The ratings on three P&I classes, Cl. A-AB, Cl. A-3 and Cl. A-4,
 were affirmed because of their credit support and the
transaction's key metrics, including Moody's loan-to-value (LTV)
ratio and Moody's stressed debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) are
within acceptable ranges. These classes will benefit from principal
paydowns as the remaining loans approach their maturity dates and
defeased loans now represent 27% of the pool. Principal proceeds
from the pool are first distributed to Class A-AB until the
principal balance of such class has been reduced to the planned
principal balance for the respective distribution date and then to
Cl. A-3 and Cl. A-4 sequentially. The planned principal balance for
Class A-AB reduces to $0 in April 2023. The ratings on six P&I
classes, Cl. B thru Cl. G, were affirmed because the ratings are
consistent with Moody's expected loss.

The rating on one P&I class, Cl. A-S, was downgraded due to
anticipated losses and increased risk of interest shortfalls due to
the exposure to specially serviced loans and the potential
refinance challenges for certain performing loans with upcoming
maturity dates. Two loans, representing nearly 32% of the pool are
in special servicing, including the Westfield Countryside (17% of
the pool) which is current on its debt service payment and matures
in June 2023 and The Mall at Tuttle Crossing (15% of the pool)
which is more than 90 days delinquent. Furthermore, one hotel loan,
Marriott Chicago River North Hotel (7.8% of the pool), may face
increased refinance risk at its maturity date in 2023 as its
reported NOI DSCR has been below 0.50X since 2020. All of the
remaining loans mature by August 2023 and if certain loans are
unable to pay off at their maturity date, the outstanding classes
may face increased interest shortfall risk.

The rating on the IO class was affirmed based on the credit quality
of the referenced classes.

The rating on the exchangeable class, Cl. PST, was affirmed due to
the credit quality of its referenced exchangeable classes.

The action has considered how the coronavirus pandemic has reshaped
the US economic environment and the way its aftershocks will
continue to reverberate and influence the performance of commercial
real estate. Moody's expect the public health situation to improve
as vaccinations against COVID-19 increase and societies continue to
adapt to new protocols. Still, the exit from the pandemic will
likely be bumpy and unpredictable and economic prospects will
vary.

Moody's regard the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under
Moody's ESG framework, given the substantial implications for
public health and safety.

Moody's rating action reflects a base expected loss of 24.6% of the
current pooled balance, compared to 26.2% at Moody's last review.
Moody's base expected loss plus realized losses is now 21.2% of the
original pooled balance, compared to 22.8% at the last review.

FACTORS THAT WOULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS:

The performance expectations for a given variable indicate Moody's
forward-looking view of the likely range of performance over the
medium term. Performance that falls outside the given range can
indicate that the collateral's credit quality is stronger or weaker
than Moody's had previously expected. Additionally, significant
changes in the 5-year rolling average of 10-year US Treasury rates
will impact the magnitude of the interest rate adjustment and may
lead to future rating actions.

Factors that could lead to an upgrade of the ratings include a
significant amount of loan paydowns or amortization, an increase in
the pool's share of defeasance or a significant improvement in pool
performance.

Factors that could lead to a downgrade of the ratings include a
decline in the performance of the pool, an increase in realized and
expected losses from specially serviced and troubled loans or
interest shortfalls.

METHODOLOGY UNDERLYING THE RATING ACTION

The methodologies used in rating all classes except interest-only
classes were "Large Loan and Single Asset/Single Borrower
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securitizations Methodology" published
in July 2022.

DEAL PERFORMANCE

As of the July 15, 2022 distribution date, the transaction's
aggregate certificate balance has decreased by 35% to $555 million
from $856 million at securitization. The certificates are
collateralized by 30 mortgage loans ranging in size from less than
1% to 16.7% of the pool, with the top ten loans (excluding
defeasance) constituting 63.5% of the pool. Eight loans,
constituting 27% of the pool, have defeased and are secured by US
government securities.

Moody's uses a variation of Herf to measure the diversity of loan
sizes, where a higher number represents greater diversity. Loan
concentration has an important bearing on potential rating
volatility, including the risk of multiple notch downgrades under
adverse circumstances. The credit neutral Herf score is 40. The
pool has a Herf of eight, compared to ten at Moody's last review.

Seven loans, constituting 14% of the pool, are on the master
servicer's watchlist. The watchlist includes loans that meet
certain portfolio review guidelines established as part of the CRE
Finance Council (CREFC) monthly reporting package. As part of
Moody's ongoing monitoring of a transaction, the agency reviews the
watchlist to assess which loans have material issues that could
affect performance.

One loan, the Matrix Corporate Center loan, has been liquidated
from the pool, resulting in a significant realized loss of $45.5
million (for a loss severity of 78%). Two loans, constituting 31.6%
of the pool, have transferred to special servicing since June
2020.

The largest specially serviced loan is the Westfield Countryside
Loan ($92.5 million -- 16.7% of the pool), which represents a
pari-passu portion of a $144.4 million mortgage loan. The loan is
secured by a 465,000 square foot (SF) component of an approximately
1.26 million square foot (SF) super-regional mall located in
Clearwater, Florida approximately 20 miles west of Tampa. The mall
is anchored by Dillard's, Macy's and JC Penney, all of which are
non-collateral. Sears (non-collateral) initially downsized its
location in 2014 and closed the remainder of its space in 2018. The
former Sears space was partially backfilled by a Whole Food's and
Nordstrom Rack. The largest collateral tenant includes a 12-screen
Cobb Theaters (lease expiration in December 2026), which re-opened
in October 2020 after being closed due to the coronavirus pandemic.
The loan has been in special servicing since June 2020 and was more
than 90 days delinquent for most of 2021. As of the July 2022
remittance statement the loan was current due to the application of
funds that were excess operating cash collected from the receiver.
As of March 2022, collateral occupancy was 71%, compared to 82% in
December 2021 and 93% in December 2019. The property's NOI has
generally declined since 2015 and the property's 2021 NOI was 37%
below securitization levels and the reported 2021 NOI DSCR was
1.12X. The loan was originally sponsored by Westfield and O'Connor
Capital Partners, however, Westfield previously indicated that they
no longer wanted to support the asset and JLL was appointed as a
receiver in January 2021 and is currently managing the property.
The special servicer is assessing additional leasing and
determining the right time to take the property to market for sale.
 As of the July 2022 remittance statement an appraisal reduction
of $67.1 million has been realized and a November 2021 appraisal
valued the property 66% lower than the appraised value at
securitization and 36% below the outstanding total mortgage loan.
Due to the declining performance and the current retail
environment, Moody's anticipates a significant loss on this loan.

The second largest loan is the Mall at Tuttle Crossing Loan ($83.1
million -- 15.0% of the pool), which represents a pari-passu
portion of a $110.0 million loan. The loan is secured by a 385,000
SF component of an approximately 1.13 million square foot (SF)
super-regional mall located in Dublin, Ohio approximately 17 miles
northwest of Columbus. The mall is currently anchored by JC Penney,
Scene 75 and Macy's (all three of which are non-collateral). Scene
75, an indoor entertainment center, backfilled a former Macy's Home
Store that closed in 2017. The mall currently has one
non-collateral vacant anchor space, a former Sears (149,000 SF),
that vacated in early 2019.  The collateral portion was 81% leased
as of December 2021, compared to 70% in April 2020, 76% in June
2019 and 88% in December 2015. The mall's in-line occupancy was 76%
in December 2021 compared to a low of 64% in April 2020 but still
lower than the 82% in December 2017. The property's net operating
income (NOI) has generally declined since 2016 due to lower
revenues. The 2019 NOI was already 26% lower than underwritten
levels and the property faced significant further NOI declines due
to the pandemic. The 2021 NOI was only $5 million compared to the
underwritten NOI of $16.6 million causing the NOI DSCR to be well
below 1.00X. The loan transferred to special servicing in July 2020
and the loan sponsor, Simon Property Group, has classified this
mall under their "Other Properties." The loan is last paid through
its July 2021 payment date and had an original maturity date in May
2023. Special servicer commentary indicated enforcement options are
being evaluated and a court appointed receiver has been working to
stabilize the property and prepare for a potential receivership
sale. As of the July 2022 remittance statement an appraisal
reduction of $43.5 million has been realized, which is based on
November 2021 appraisal which valued the property 79% lower than
the appraised value at securitization and nearly 56% below the
outstanding total mortgage loan. Due to the declining performance
and the current retail environment, Moody's anticipates a
significant loss on this loan.

Moody's has also assumed a high default probability for two poorly
performing loans, constituting 8.4% of the pool. The largest
troubled loan is The Marriott Chicago River North Hotel Loan ($43.3
million -- 7.8% of the pool), which is secured by a full-service
hotel property in downtown Chicago, IL. The Hotel is dual flagged
under Marriott's Residence Inn and Springhill Suites brands and
operates subject to Franchise agreements that are scheduled to
expire in 2033. The property's 2019 NOI declined nearly 20% year
over year due to lower room revenue and increased operating
expenses. The loan had been in special servicing from July 2020
through January 2022, when the loan was brought current and
subsequently returned to the master servicer as a performing loan.
The loan remains on the watchlist due to DSCR triggers as a result
of depressed 2021 performance. As of the March 2022 STR report, the
collateral's trailing twelve month occupancy and RevPAR were 53.6%
and $82.31, respectively, both of which exceeded its competitive
set. While at the prior review, an appraisal reduction of $11.4
million has been recognized, a recent appraisal valued the property
25% above the outstanding total mortgage loan balance. Despite the
upward trend, Moody's considers this a troubled loan.

Moody's estimates an aggregate $134.8 million loss for the
specially serviced and troubled loans (61% expected loss on
average).

As of the July 2022 remittance statement cumulative interest
shortfalls were $3.5 million. Moody's anticipates interest
shortfalls will continue because of the exposure to specially
serviced loans and/or modified loans. Interest shortfalls are
caused by special servicing fees, including workout and liquidation
fees, appraisal entitlement reductions (ASERs), loan modifications
and extraordinary trust expenses.

The credit risk of loans is determined primarily by two factors: 1)
Moody's assessment of the probability of default, which is largely
driven by each loan's DSCR, and 2) Moody's assessment of the
severity of loss upon a default, which is largely driven by each
loan's loan-to-value ratio, referred to as the Moody's LTV or MLTV.
 As described in the CMBS methodology used to rate this
transaction, Moody's make various adjustments to the MLTV. Moody's
adjust the MLTV for each loan using a value that reflects
capitalization (cap) rates that are between Moody's sustainable cap
rates and market cap rates. Moody's also use an adjusted loan
balance that reflects each loan's amortization profile. The MLTV
reported in this publication reflects the MLTV before the
adjustments described in the methodology.

Moody's received full year 2021 operating results for 95% of the
pool, and partial year 2022 operating results for 56% of the pool
(excluding specially serviced and defeased loans). Moody's weighted
average conduit LTV is 81%, compared to 101% at Moody's last
review. Moody's conduit component excludes loans with structured
credit assessments, defeased and CTL loans, and specially serviced
and troubled loans. Moody's net cash flow (NCF) reflects a weighted
average haircut of 16% to the most recently available net operating
income (NOI), excluding hotel properties that had significantly
depressed NOI in 2021. Moody's value reflects a weighted average
capitalization rate of 10.1%.

Moody's actual and stressed conduit DSCRs are 1.68X and 1.42X,
respectively, compared to 1.44X and 1.14X at the last review.
Moody's actual DSCR is based on Moody's NCF and the loan's actual
debt service. Moody's stressed DSCR is based on Moody's NCF and a
9.25% stress rate the agency applied to the loan balance.

The top three conduit loans represent 14% of the pool balance. The
largest loan is the Bridgewater Campus Loan ($38.1 million -- 6.9%
of the pool), which is secured by eight Class B mixed-use buildings
totaling 446,649 SF. The property is located in Bridgewater, New
Jersey, approximately 41 miles southwest of New York City. The
buildings are leased to three tenants, all of which have been at
the property since securitization and have lease expirations in
2023 or later. As of March 2022, the property was 87% leased,
unchanged from September 2020 and compared to 100% in December
2019. The loan has amortized over 12% since securitization and
matures in July 2023. Moody's LTV and stressed DSCR are 98% and
1.05X, respectively, compared to 98% and 1.02X at the last review.

The second largest loan is the ADG Pool 6 Loan ($21.3 million –
3.8% of the pool), which is secured by a portfolio of 16 mobile
home parks, all located in Wisconsin, and built between 1960 and
1994. The portfolio was 79% leased as of March 2022, compared to
77% from 2018 through 2020. The loan has amortized 17% since
securitization and matures in July 2023. Moody's LTV and stressed
DSCR are 84% and 1.23X, respectively, compared to 105% and 1.00X at
the last review.

The third largest loan is the ADG Pool 4 Loan ($19.7 million –
3.6% of the pool), which is secured by a portfolio of 13 mobile
home parks located in Wisconsin and Minnesota, built between 1950
and 1980. The portfolio was 82% leased as of March 2022, compared
to 81% in 2019 and 2020. The loan has amortized 17% since
securitization and matures in July 2023. Moody's LTV and stressed
DSCR are 75% and 1.39X, respectively, compared to 82% and 1.27X at
the last review.


MORGAN STANLEY 2022-17A: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to $1MM F Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned ratings to two classes of
notes issued by Morgan Stanley Eaton Vance CLO 2022-17A, Ltd. (the
"Issuer" or "MSEV 2022-17A").

Moody's rating action is as follows:

US$246,000,000 Class A-1 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2034, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

US$1,000,000 Class F Junior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes
due 2035, Definitive Rating Assigned B3 (sf)

The notes listed are referred to herein, collectively, as the
"Rated Notes."

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on Moody's methodology and
considers all relevant risks, particularly those associated with
the CLO's portfolio and structure.

MSEV 2022-17A is a managed cash flow CLO. The issued notes will be
collateralized primarily by broadly syndicated senior secured
corporate loans. At least 92.5% of the portfolio must consist of
senior secured loans and eligible investments , and up to 7.5% of
the portfolio may consist of second lien loans, unsecured loans and
bonds. The portfolio is approximately 95% ramped as of the closing
date.

Morgan Stanley Eaton Vance CLO Manager LLC (the "Manager") will
direct the selection, acquisition and disposition of the assets on
behalf of the Issuer and may engage in trading activity, including
discretionary trading, during the transaction's five year
reinvestment period. Thereafter, subject to certain restrictions,
the Manager may reinvest unscheduled principal payments and
proceeds from sales of credit risk assets.

In addition to the Rated Notes, the Issuer issued six other classes
of secured notes and one class of subordinated notes.

The transaction incorporates interest and par coverage tests which,
if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to pay down
the notes in order of seniority.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in Section 2.3.2.1
of the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan
Obligations" rating methodology published in December 2021.

For modeling purposes, Moody's used the following base-case
assumptions:

Par amount: $400,000,000

Diversity Score: 65

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2931

Weighted Average Spread (WAS): 3mS + 3.50%

Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 6.00%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 47.0%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 8 years

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2021.

Factors That Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the Rated Notes is subject to uncertainty. The
performance of the Rated Notes is sensitive to the performance of
the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. The Manager's investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
performance of the Rated Notes.


MOSAIC SOLAR 2022-2: Fitch Gives BB(EXP) Rating on Class D Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned expected ratings to notes issued by
Mosaic Solar Loan Trust 2022-2 (Mosaic 2022-2).

RATING ACTIONS

ENTITY/DEBT         RATING                         
   ----             ------                          
Mosaic Solar Loan Trust
2022-2

    A               LT   AA-(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

    B               LT   A- (EXP)sf   Expected Rating

    C               LT   BBB(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

    D               LT   BB (EXP)sf   Expected Rating

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

Mosaic 2022-2 is a securitization of consumer loans backed by
residential solar equipment. The originator is Solar Mosaic, LLC,
one of the longest-established solar lenders in the U.S.; it has
advanced solar loans since 2014 and financed them through public
securitizations since 2017.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

LIMITED PERFORMANCE HISTORY INFORMS 'AAsf' CAP

Notwithstanding strong borrower demographics and expected
performance attributes similar residential home loans, the absence
of through-the-cycle performance warrants relatively conservative
rating assumptions. While more robust than other solar lenders,
observed performance data for Mosaic originated loans of
approximately six years is relatively limited compared to
residential solar loan terms of 25 to 30 years.

EXTRAPOLATED ASSET ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch considered both originator-wide data and previous Mosaic
transactions to set a lifetime default expectation of 9%, based on
the annualized default rate (ADR) from historical data and certain
forward-looking prepayment assumptions. Fitch has also assumed a
30% base case recovery rate. Fitch's Rating Default Rate (RDR) for
'AA-sf', 'A-sf', 'BBBsf', 'BBsf' are, respectively, 36.3%, 27%,
21.6% and 14.9%. Fitch's Rating Recovery Rate (RRR) for 'AA-sf',
'A-sf', 'BBBsf', 'BBsf' are, respectively, 19%, 21.8%, 23.3% and
25.5%.

ESTABLISHED LENDER, BUT NEW ASSETS

Mosaic is one of the first movers among U.S. solar loan lenders,
with the longest track record among the originators of the solar
ABS that Fitch rates. Concord Servicing LLC is the subservicer,
while Mosaic has remained in its role in direct servicing over
time. Servicing disruption risk is further mitigated by the
appointment of Vervent, Inc. as the backup servicer.

TRIGGER BREACH MATERIAL TO CASH FLOW ANALYSIS

The class A and B notes will initially amortize based on target
overcollateralization percentages. Should asset performance
deteriorate, additional principal will be paid to cover any
defaulted amounts and, once the cumulative loss trigger is
breached, the payment waterfall will switch to "turbo" sequential
to the senior class, deferring any interest payments for class C
and D and thus accelerating the class A deleveraging. The trigger
provides less protection in Fitch's driving model scenario for
class A, which features back-loaded defaults and low prepayments.

STANDARD, REPUTABLE COUNTERPARTIES; NO SWAP

The transaction account is with Wilmington Trust (A/Negative/F1)
and the servicer's account is with Wells Fargo Bank
(AA-/Negative/F1+). Commingling risk is mitigated by the transfer
of collections within two business days, high ACH share at closing
and ratings of Wells Fargo.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Asset performance that indicates an implied ADR above 1.1% and

    a simultaneous fall in prepayments activity may put pressure
    on the rating or lead to a Negative Outlook.

-- Material changes in policy support, the economics of
    purchasing and financing PV panels and batteries, and/or  
    ground-breaking technological advances that make the existing
    equipment obsolete may also affect the ratings negatively.

Below, Fitch shows model-implied rating sensitivities to changes in
default and/or recovery assumptions.

Increase of defaults (Class A / B / C / D):

+10%: 'AA-sf' / 'A-sf' / 'BBBsf'/ 'BBsf';
+25%: 'A+sf' / 'BBB+sf' / 'BBB-sf' / 'BBsf';
+50%: 'Asf' / 'BBBsf' / 'BB+sf' / 'B+sf'.

Decrease of recoveries (Class A / B / C / D):

-10%: 'AA-sf' / 'A-sf' / 'BBBsf' / 'BBsf';
-25%: 'AA-sf' / 'A-sf' / 'BBBsf' / 'BBsf';
-50%: 'AA-sf' / 'A-sf' / 'BBBsf' / 'BBsf'.

Increase of defaults and decrease of recoveries (Class A / B / C /
D):

+10% / -10%: 'AA-sf' / 'A-sf' / 'BBBsf' / 'BBsf';
+25% / -25%: 'A+sf' / 'BBB+sf' / 'BBB-sf' / 'BBsf';
+50% / -50%: 'A-sf' / 'BBB-sf' / 'BBsf' / 'Bsf'.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

Fitch currently caps ratings in the 'AAsf' category due to limited
performance history, while the assigned 'AA-sf' rating is further
constrained by the level of credit enhancement (CE). As a result, a
positive rating action could result from an increase of CE due to
deleveraging, underpinned by good transaction performance; for
example, through high prepayments and ADR below 1.1%.

Below Fitch shows model-implied rating sensitivities, capped at
'AA+sf', to changes in default and/or recovery assumptions.

Decrease of defaults (Class A / B / C / D):

-10%: 'AA+sf' / 'A+sf' / 'BBB+sf' / 'BBB-sf'
-25%: 'AA+sf' / 'AA-sf' / 'Asf' / 'BBBsf'
-50%: 'AA+sf' / 'AA+sf' / 'A+sf' / 'Asf'

Increase of recoveries (Class A / B / C / D):

+10%: 'AAsf' / 'Asf' / 'BBB+sf' / 'BB+sf'
+25%: 'AA+sf' / 'Asf' / 'BBB+sf' / 'BBB-sf'
+50%: 'AA+sf' / 'A+sf' / 'BBB+sf' / 'BBB-sf'

Decrease of defaults and increase of recoveries (Class A / B / C /
D):

-10% / +10%: 'AA+sf' / 'A+sf' / 'BBB+sf' / 'BBB-sf'
-25% / +25%: 'AA+sf' / 'AAsf' / 'Asf' / 'BBB+sf'
-50% / +50%: 'AA+sf' / 'AA+sf' / 'A+sf' / 'Asf'


NATIONAL COLLEGIATE 2007-4: S&P Affirms 'CC' Rating on A-3-L Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its rating on four classes from
National Collegiate Master Student Loan Trust I and 12 classes from
National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-3 and 2007-4. All three
of the trusts are collateralized by a pool of private student loans
issued between 2001 and 2007.

The rating actions considered collateral performance since our last
review and its impact on the available credit enhancement relative
to remaining net losses. The rating actions also considered the
trusts' relevant structural features--in particular, each trust's
cost of funds, capital structure, payment waterfalls, available
credit enhancement, and operational risk provisions.

Ongoing litigation between the transaction parties is still
pending. S&P said, "In our view, the servicer and special servicer
for these transactions are key transaction parties performing roles
that affect the collateral's performance. In our view, there is
still uncertainty as to how the resolution of the litigation will
affect the transactions and the roles of their related servicers.
In applying our operational risk criteria framework, this
uncertainty affected our assessment of the maximum potential
rating. We have assessed the maximum rating on the notes to be
limited to the 'BB' category."

Trust Performance

Since S&P's last full surveillance review, the pace of increase in
cumulative defaults for all three trusts has slowed. Additionally,
the percentage of loans in repayment and current status has
remained stable. The performance, in terms of the pace of defaults
and the percentage of loans in repayment, indicates that the trusts
are likely past their peak default periods.

The historical impact of poor collateral performance, as measured
by high levels of realized cumulative net losses, has led to
significant undercollateralization for all of the trusts. Based on
the information in the latest servicer report, total parity for
each trust is less than 30%. However, class parity for
highest-priority notes in series 2007-3 and 2007-4 that are
currently receiving principal payments have increased since our
last review.

Structural Features

All three of the trusts were originally structured with a bond
insurance policy from Ambac. Because S&P does not rate Ambac, it
does not assume the bond insurance policy provides any support to
the notes.

The reserve accounts for each of the trusts are currently at, or
amortizing to, their respective floors. The reserve accounts are
available to pay note interest and fees, as well as principal at
final maturity.

Master Trust I pays principal sequentially in ascending order of
the numerical designation of the series of outstanding notes. The
2007-3 and 2007-4 trusts pay principal pro rata between the LIBOR
rate note and the auction rate notes. All three trusts have a
single-class structure and accordingly pay interest pro rata to all
the notes each distribution period.

At issuance, each of the trusts were structured to provide excess
spread over the transaction's life as additional credit
enhancement. Excess spread levels have been under pressure for each
trust, primarily because of undercollateralization. Additionally,
all three trusts contain higher-cost auction-rate notes. Coupons on
the auction-rate notes have been based on the maximum rate
definitions in the indentures (generally LIBOR plus a rating
dependent margin) since the auction-rate market failed.

Rationale

S&P said, "The class A-3-AR-3 notes for the series 2007-3 and
2007-4 have started receiving principal payments, resulting in
increases in class parity, but remain exposed to negative excess
spread caused by substantial undercollateralization of the deal.
Class AR-13 of the master trust has been receiving principal
payments, but continues to experience declines in class parity due
to exposure to negative excess spread and is now
undercollateralized. All of the remaining classes are substantially
undercollateralized and continue to experience declines in class
parity despite stable collateral performance. Accordingly, we have
applied our "Criteria For Assigning 'CCC+', 'CCC', 'CCC-', and 'CC'
Ratings," published Oct. 1, 2012, in surveilling the remaining
undercollateralized notes from all three trusts.

"In applying our criteria, we rate an issue 'CC (sf)' when we
expect default to be virtually certain, regardless of the time to
default. Accordingly, the 'CC (sf)' ratings reflect that we believe
these classes will default under the optimistic collateral
performance scenario over a longer period of time based on their
undercollateralization and their declining trend in hard
enhancement (despite recent improvements in collateral
performance). The class A-3-AR-3 notes for the series 2007-3 and
2007-4 are rated 'CCC (sf)', reflecting that while they are not
undercollateralized, they are vulnerable to nonpayment,
particularly in a rising interest rate environment, which would put
additional pressure on excess spread. The class AR-12 of the master
trust is rated 'CCC- (sf)', reflecting its current
undercollateralization and the negative trend in its hard
enhancement.

"We will continue to monitor the ongoing performance of these
trusts. In particular, we will continue to review available credit
enhancement, which is primarily a function of the pace of defaults,
principal amortization, excess spread, and the unresolved disputes
between the transaction parties."

  Ratings Affirmed
  
  National Collegiate Master Student Loan Trust I

  Series NCT-2003, class AR-13: CCC- (sf)
  Series NCT-2003, class AR-14: CC (sf)

  National Collegiate Master Student Loan Trust I

  Series NCT-2005AR, class AR-15: CC (sf)
  Series NCT-2005AR, class AR-16: CC (sf)
  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-3

  Class A-3-AR-3: CCC (sf)
  Class A-3-AR-4: CC (sf)
  Class A-3-AR-5: CC (sf)
  Class A-3-AR-6: CC (sf)
  Class A-3-AR-7: CC (sf)
  Class A-3-L: CC (sf)

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-4

  Class A-3-AR-3: CCC (sf)
  Class A-3-AR-4: CC (sf)
  Class A-3-AR-5: CC (sf)
  Class A-3-AR-6: CC (sf)
  Class A-3-AR-7: CC (sf)
  Class A-3-L: CC (sf)



NCF GRANTOR 2005-3: S&P Affirms BB+ (sf) Rating on Cl. A-5-2 Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised the ratings on eight classes, placed one
rating on CreditWatch positive, and affirmed the ratings on 15
classes from National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts (12 discrete
trusts and four grantor trusts, all collateralized by private
student loans issued between 2003 and 2007. The remaining 20
ratings were previously lowered to 'D (sf)' because the affected
classes breached their subordinate interest triggers and missed
receiving timely interest payments.

The rating actions considered the trusts' collateral performance
since S&P's last review and its effects on the available credit
enhancement relative to remaining net losses. The rating actions
also considered the trusts' relevant structural features--in
particular, each trust's cost of funds, capital structure, payment
waterfalls, available credit enhancement, and operational risk
provisions.

Ongoing litigation between the transaction parties is still
pending. S& said, "In our view, the servicer and special servicer
for these transactions are key transaction parties performing roles
that affect the collateral's performance. In our view, there is
still uncertainty as to how the resolution of the litigation will
affect the transactions and the roles of their related servicers.
In applying our operational risk criteria framework, this
uncertainty affected our assessment of the maximum potential
rating. We have assessed the maximum rating on the notes to be
limited to the 'BB' category."

Trust Performance

Since S&P's last surveillance review, the pace of increase in
cumulative defaults for all 16 trusts has slowed. Additionally, the
percentage of loans in repayment and current status has remained
stable. The performance, in terms of the pace of defaults and the
percentage of loans in repayment, indicates that the trusts are
likely past their peak default periods.

The historical impact of poor collateral performance, as measured
by high levels of realized cumulative net losses, has led to
significant undercollateralization for all of the trusts. Based on
the information in the latest servicer report, total parity for all
trusts is in the range of 36%-79%. However, class parity for almost
all of the highest-priority notes that are currently receiving
principal payments have increased since our last review. For series
2006-2, the class parity for the highest-priority notes (class A-4)
has declined since S&P's last review.

Structural Features

The reserve accounts for each of the trusts are currently at, or
are amortizing to, their respective floors. The reserve accounts
are available to pay note interest (except for the interest on
subordinate classes that have been reprioritized) and fees, as well
as principal at final maturity.

In addition to subordination of the lower classes of notes in each
trust, all of the trusts except for series 2003-1 and 2004-1 are
supported by interest reprioritization triggers. The triggers are
generally based on a cumulative default threshold or parity levels.
When a class' interest reprioritization trigger is breached, the
interest payment to that class will become subordinate to principal
payments of the most senior classes until targeted parity levels
are reached.

At issuance, each of the trusts were structured to provide excess
spread over the transaction's life as additional credit
enhancement. Excess spread levels have been under pressure for each
trust, primarily because of undercollateralization. Additionally,
the series 2003-1 and 2004-1 transactions contain higher-cost,
auction-rate notes. The coupons on the auction-rate notes have been
based on the maximum rate definitions in the indentures (generally
LIBOR plus a rating-dependent margin) since the auction-rate market
failed.

Rationale

The grantor trusts are pass-through structures, and the ratings on
the certificates issued out of the related grantor trusts are
linked to the credit quality of the underlying notes repackaged
from the discrete trust.

The discrete trusts are impaired by substantial
undercollateralization levels due primarily to historical loss
performance. However, the credit enhancement as measured by class
parity has increased for current paying senior notes in most of the
trusts due to recent improvement in collateral performance and
continued deleveraging. Additionally, the senior notes for trusts
with subordinate note interest triggers are generally able to
absorb greater losses than trusts without subordinate note
triggers. As discussed above, when an interest trigger is breached,
available funds in the trust's payment waterfall are used to make
principal payments to the senior notes before paying interest to
the subordinate notes.

S&P said, "We affirmed the 'BB+ (sf)' ratings on seven classes
based on the improvement in hard enhancement relative to remaining
net losses since our last review. We also raised the ratings on six
classes to 'BB+ (sf)' based on our review of their credit metrics
as compared to similar classes at the time of the last review. This
is the maximum rating for the notes given our operational risk
assessment discussed above.

"Eleven classes were affected by the application of our criteria
for assigning 'CCC' and 'CC' ratings. In applying our criteria, we
rate an issuer or issue 'CC' when we expect default to be a virtual
certainty, regardless of the time to default. Accordingly, the 'CC
(sf)' ratings on eight classes reflect our view that the classes
will default under even optimistic collateral performance scenarios
over a longer period of time based on their undercollateralization
(despite recent improvements in collateral performance). We raised
the rating on series 2005-3's class B notes to 'CCC (sf)'
reflecting improvement in credit enhancement since our last review,
despite the class remaining undercollateralized. In our view, the
notes could reach 100% parity if positive trends continue or
improve; however, they still may be vulnerable to non-payment."

Series 2006-3's class B notes were previously rated 'D (sf)' due to
missed monthly interest payments and declining trends in
undercollateralization. The class started receiving interest again
in September 2016 after missing interest payments from August 2013
and is now current. Additionally, credit enhancement has improved
since S&P's last review and could reach 100% parity if positive
trends continue or improve. Accordingly, S&P raised the rating on
this class to 'CCC (sf)'.

S&P said, "Series 2005-1's class B notes were previously rated 'CCC
(sf)'. Based on the growth in hard enhancement relative to
remaining net losses, we believe the class may have credit
enhancement sufficient for a higher rating. Accordingly, we placed
the rating on CreditWatch positive.

"We previously lowered 20 of our ratings on the class B, C, and D
notes from the discrete trusts to 'D (sf)' because the affected
classes stopped receiving interest payments after their subordinate
interest triggers were breached (which occurs when the class senior
in the capital structure becomes undercollateralized). While some
of the classes have since started to receive interest payments due
to the increase in parity of the class senior in the capital
structure, we are not raising the ratings of these classes from 'D
(sf)' because, in our view, a further default is virtually certain
based on the current level of undercollateralization.

"We will continue to monitor the ongoing performance of these
trusts. In particular, we will continue to review available credit
enhancement, which is primarily a function of the pace of defaults,
principal amortization, excess spread, and the ongoing disputes
between the transaction parties."

  Ratings Raised

  NCF Grantor Trust 2005-2

  Series 2005-2, class A-5-1 to 'BB+ (sf)' from 'BB- (sf)'
  Series 2005-2, class A-5-2 to 'BB+ (sf)' from 'BB- (sf)'

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2003-1 (The)

  Series 2003-1, class A-7 to 'BB+ (sf)' from 'BB (sf)'

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2004-2 (The)

  Series 2004-2, class B to 'BB+ (sf)' from 'BB (sf)'

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-3 (The)

  Series 2005-3, class B to 'CCC (sf)' from 'CC (sf)'

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-3 (The)

  Series 2006-3, class A-5 to 'BB+ (sf)' from 'BB (sf)'
  Series 2006-3, class B to 'CCC (sf)' from 'D (sf)'

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-2 (The)

  Series 2007-2, class A-4 to 'BB+ (sf)' from 'B- (sf)'
  Rating On CreditWatch Positive

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-1 (The)

  Series 2005-1, class B to 'CCC(sf)' CW Pos from 'CCC(sf)'

  Ratings Affirmed

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2003-1 (The)

  Series 2003-1, class B-1: CC (sf)
  Series 2003-1, class B-2: CC (sf)

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2004-1 (The)

  Series 2004-1, class A-4 : CC (sf)
  Series 2004-1, class B-1 ARC: CC (sf)
  Series 2004-1, class B-2 ARC: CC (sf)

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2004-2 (The)

  Series 2004-2, class C: D (sf)

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-1 (The)

  Series 2005-1, class C: D (sf)

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-2 (The)

  Series 2005-2, class B: D (sf)
  Series 2005-2, class C: D (sf)

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-3 (The)

  Series 2005-3, class C: D (sf)

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-1 (The)

  Series 2006-1, class A-5: BB+ (sf)
  Series 2006-1, class B: D (sf)
  Series 2006-1, class C: D (sf)

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-2 (The)

  Series 2006-2, class A-4: CC (sf)
  Series 2006-2, class B: D (sf)
  Series 2006-2, class C: D (sf)

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-3 (The)

  Series 2006-3, class C: D (sf)
  Series 2006-3, class D: D (sf)

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-4 (The)

  Series 2006-4, class A-4: BB+ (sf)
  Series 2006-4, class B: D (sf)
  Series 2006-4, class C: D (sf)
  Series 2006-4, class D: D (sf)

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-1 (The)

  Series 2007-1, class A-4: BB+ (sf)
  Series 2007-1, class B: D (sf)
  Series 2007-1, class C: D (sf)
  Series 2007-1, class D: D (sf)

  National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-2 (The)

  Series 2007-2, class B: D (sf)
  Series 2007-2, class C: D (sf)
  Series 2007-2, class D: D (sf)

  NCF Grantor Trust 2004-1

  Series 2004-1, class A-1: CC (sf)
  Series 2004-1, class A-2: CC (sf)

  NCF Grantor Trust 2005-1

  Series 2005-1, class A-5-1: BB+ (sf)
  Series 2005-1, class A-5-2: BB+ (sf)

  NCF Grantor Trust 2005-3

  Series 2005-3, class A-5-1: BB+ (sf)
  Series 2005-3, class A-5-2: BB+ (sf)



NEW RESIDENTIAL 2022-SFR2: DBRS Gives Prov. BB Rating on F Certs
----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following
Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates to be issued by New
Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2022-SFR2 (NRMLT 2022-SFR2):

-- $143.2 million Class A at AAA (sf)
-- $57.5 million Class B at AA (high) (sf)
-- $17.4 million Class C at A (high) (sf)
-- $23.9 million Class D at A (low) (sf)
-- $42.3 million Class E-1 at BBB (sf)
-- $6.5 million Class E-2 at BBB (low) (sf)
-- $42.3 million Class F at BB (low) (sf)

The AAA (sf) rating on the Class A certificate reflects 61.4% of
credit enhancement, provided by the subordinated notes in the pool.
The AA (high) (sf), A (high) (sf), A (low) (sf), BBB (sf), BBB
(low) (sf), BB (low) (sf) ratings on Classes B, C, D, E-1, E-2, and
F, respectively, reflect 45.9%, 41.2%, 34.8%, 23.4%, 21.6%, and
10.2% of credit enhancement, respectively.

Other than the specified classes above, DBRS Morningstar does not
rate classes in this transaction.

New Residential Mortgage Loan Trust's 1,404 properties are in 12
states, with the largest concentration by broker price opinion
value in Florida (26.6%). The largest metropolitan statistical area
(MSA) by value is Houston (13.0%), followed by Atlanta (10.9%). The
geographic concentration dictates the home-price stresses applied
to the portfolio and the resulting market value decline (MVD). The
MVD at the AAA (sf) rating level for this deal is 56.4%. NRMLT
2022-SFR2 has properties from 27 MSAs, many of which experienced
dramatic home price index declines in the housing crisis of 2008.

DBRS Morningstar assigned the provisional ratings for each class of
certificates by performing a quantitative and qualitative
collateral, structural, and legal analysis. This analysis uses DBRS
Morningstar's single-family rental subordination model and is based
on DBRS Morningstar's published criteria. DBRS Morningstar
developed property-level stresses for the analysis of single-family
rental assets. DBRS Morningstar will finalize the provisional
ratings on each class based on the level of stresses each class can
withstand and whether such stresses are commensurate with the
applicable rating level. DBRS Morningstar's analysis includes
estimated base-case net cash flows (NCFs) based on an evaluation of
the gross rent, concession, vacancy, operating expenses, and
capital expenditure data. The DBRS Morningstar NCF analysis
resulted in a minimum debt service coverage ratio of higher than
1.0 times.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



OBX TRUST 2022-J2: Moody's Assigns B2 Rating to Cl. B-5 Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned definitive ratings to 34
classes of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) issued by
OBX 2022-J2 Trust, and sponsored by Onslow Bay Financial LLC
(Onslow Bay).

The securities are backed by a pool of prime jumbo (92% by balance)
and GSE-eligible (8% by balance) residential mortgages originated
by multiple entities and serviced by NewRez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint
Mortgage Servicing.

The complete rating actions are as follows:

Issuer: OBX 2022-J2 Trust

Cl. A-1, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-2, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-3, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-4, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-5, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-6, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-7, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-8, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-9, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-10, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-11, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-12, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-13, Definitive Rating Assigned Aa1 (sf)

Cl. A-14, Definitive Rating Assigned Aa1 (sf)

Cl. A-15, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-16, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-1*, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-2*, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-3*, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-4*, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-5*, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-6*, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-7*, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-X-8*, Definitive Rating Assigned Aa1 (sf)

Cl. A-X-9*, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Cl. B-1, Definitive Rating Assigned Aa3 (sf)

Cl. B-X-1*, Definitive Rating Assigned Aa3 (sf)

Cl. B-1A, Definitive Rating Assigned Aa3 (sf)

Cl. B-2, Definitive Rating Assigned A2 (sf)

Cl. B-X-2*, Definitive Rating Assigned A2 (sf)

Cl. B-2A, Definitive Rating Assigned A2 (sf)

Cl. B-3, Definitive Rating Assigned Baa2 (sf)

Cl. B-4, Definitive Rating Assigned Ba1 (sf)

Cl. B-5, Definitive Rating Assigned B2 (sf)

*Reflects Interest-Only Classes

Moody's is withdrawing the provisional ratings for the Class A-1A
and A-2A loans, assigned on July 26, 2022, because the issuer will
not be issuing these classes.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The ratings are based on the credit quality of the mortgage loans,
the structural features of the transaction, the origination quality
and the servicing arrangement, the third-party review, and the
representations and warranties framework.

Moody's expected loss for this pool in a baseline scenario-mean is
0.58%, in a baseline scenario-median is 0.39% and reaches 4.00% at
a stress level consistent with Moody's Aaa ratings.

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in rating all classes except
interest-only classes was "Moody's Approach to Rating US RMBS Using
the MILAN Framework" published in July 2022.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

Up

Levels of credit protection that are higher than necessary to
protect investors against current expectations of loss could drive
the ratings up. Losses could decline from Moody's original
expectations as a result of a lower number of obligor defaults or
appreciation in the value of the mortgaged property securing an
obligor's promise of payment. Transaction performance also depends
greatly on the US macro economy and housing market.

Down

Levels of credit protection that are insufficient to protect
investors against current expectations of loss could drive the
ratings down. Losses could rise above Moody's original expectations
as a result of a higher number of obligor defaults or deterioration
in the value of the mortgaged property securing an obligor's
promise of payment. Transaction performance also depends greatly on
the US macro economy and housing market. Other reasons for
worse-than-expected performance include poor servicing, error on
the part of transaction parties, inadequate transaction governance
and fraud.


OHA CREDIT 12: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to $1MM Class F Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned ratings to three classes of
notes issued by OHA Credit Funding 12, Ltd. (the "Issuer" or "OHA
12").

Moody's rating action is as follows:

-- US$320,000,000 Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes
    due 2033, Assigned Aaa (sf)

-- US$45,750,000 Class B Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
    2033, Assigned Aa2 (sf)

-- US$1,000,000 Class F Junior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
    Notes due 2033, Assigned B3 (sf)

The notes listed are referred to herein, collectively, as the
"Rated Notes."

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on Moody's methodology and
considers all relevant risks, particularly those associated with
the CLO's portfolio and structure.

OHA 12 is a managed cash flow CLO. The issued notes will be
collateralized primarily by broadly syndicated senior secured
corporate loans. At least 90% of the portfolio must consist of
senior secured loans, and up to 10% of the portfolio may consist of
second lien loans, unsecured loans and bonds. The portfolio is
approximately 95% ramped as of the closing date.

Oak Hill Advisors, L.P. (the "Manager") will direct the selection,
acquisition and disposition of the assets on behalf of the Issuer
and may engage in trading activity, including discretionary
trading, during the transaction's three year reinvestment period.
Thereafter, subject to certain restrictions, the Manager may
reinvest unscheduled principal payments and proceeds from sales of
credit risk assets.

In addition to the Rated Notes, the Issuer issued three other
classes of secured notes and one class of subordinated notes.

The transaction incorporates interest and par coverage tests which,
if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to pay down
the notes in order of seniority.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in Section 2.3.2.1
of the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan
Obligations" rating methodology published in December 2021.

For modeling purposes, Moody's used the following base-case
assumptions:

Par amount: $500,000,000

Diversity Score: 61

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2869

Weighted Average Spread (WAS): 3mS + 3.34%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 47.0%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 7 years

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2021.

Factors That Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the Rated Notes is subject to uncertainty. The
performance of the Rated Notes is sensitive to the performance of
the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. The Manager's investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
performance of the Rated Notes.


PALMER SQUARE 2022-3: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to $1MM F Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned ratings to two classes of
notes issued by Palmer Square CLO 2022-3, Ltd. (the "Issuer" or
"Palmer Square CLO 2022-3").

Moody's rating action is as follows:

US$320,000,000 Class A-1 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2035, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

US$1,000,000 Class F Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes due
2035, Definitive Rating Assigned B3 (sf)

The notes listed are referred to herein, collectively, as the
"Rated Notes."

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on Moody's methodology and
considers all relevant risks, particularly those associated with
the CLO's portfolio and structure.

Palmer Square CLO 2022-3 is a managed cash flow CLO. The issued
notes will be collateralized primarily by broadly syndicated senior
secured corporate loans. At least 90% of the portfolio must consist
of senior secured loans, cash, and eligible investments, and up to
10% of the portfolio may consist of second lien loans, senior
unsecured loans, and permitted non-loan assets. The portfolio is
approximately 90% ramped as of the closing date.

Palmer Square Europe Capital Management LLC (the "Manager") will
direct the selection, acquisition and disposition of the assets on
behalf of the Issuer and may engage in trading activity, including
discretionary trading, during the transaction's five year
reinvestment period. Thereafter, subject to certain restrictions,
the Manager may reinvest unscheduled principal payments and
proceeds from sales of credit risk assets.

In addition to the Rated Notes, the Issuer issued six other classes
of secured notes and one class of subordinated notes.

The transaction incorporates interest and par coverage tests which,
if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to pay down
the notes in order of seniority.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in Section 2.3.2.1
of the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan
Obligations" rating methodology published in December 2021.

For modeling purposes, Moody's used the following base-case
assumptions:

Par amount: $500,000,000

Diversity Score: 70

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2969

Weighted Average Spread (WAS): 3.10%

Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 6.00%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 47.0%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 8.0 years

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2021.

Factors That Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the Rated Notes is subject to uncertainty. The
performance of the Rated Notes is sensitive to the performance of
the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. The Manager's investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
performance of the Rated Notes.


PFP 2019-6: DBRS Hikes Class G Notes Rating to B(high)
------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited upgraded the ratings on the following classes of notes
issued by PFP 2019-6, Ltd.:

-- Class B to AAA (sf) from AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C to A (high) (sf) from A (low) (sf)
-- Class D to A (sf) from BBB (high) (sf)
-- Class E to BBB (high) (sf) from BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F to BB (high) (sf) from BB (low) (sf)
-- Class G to B (high) (sf) from B (low) (sf)

In addition, DBRS Morningstar confirmed the following class of
notes:

-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)

All trends are Stable. The rating for Class A was discontinued as
the class was fully repaid as of the July 2022 remittance report.

The rating upgrades reflect the increased credit support to the
bonds as a result of successful loan repayment as there has been
58.2% collateral reduction since closing with 13 of the original 36
loans remaining in the trust as of the July 2022 remittance. DBRS
Morningstar has published a Surveillance Performance Update report
with in-depth analysis and credit metrics for the transaction and
with business plan updates on select loans.

As of the July 2022 remittance, the trust reported an outstanding
balance of $317.8 million. Since the previous DBRS Morningstar
rating action in October 2021, 11 loans were repaid from the trust.
To date, the lender has advanced $19.1 million in loan future
funding to eight individual borrowers to aid in property
stabilization for the remaining loans in the pool. An additional
$8.2 million in loan future funding allocated to the borrower of
the 5 Wood Hollow Road loan remains outstanding. The loan is
secured by an office property in Parsippany, New Jersey, and the
borrower's business plan was to complete capital improvements and
fund leasing cost through available future funding dollars to lease
the property to stabilization. According to the Q2 2022 collateral
manager update, an additional $13.5 million of formerly available
loan future funding dollars previously allocated to six additional
borrowers will no longer be advanced as the period in which the
borrowers could have requested those dollars has now expired.

The transaction is concentrated by property with office,
multifamily, mixed-use, and hotel properties representing 45.4%,
29.5%, 8.2%, and 5.3% of the pool balance, respectively. The
property type concentration is generally similar with the pool
composition as of September 2021 but has changed since issuance
when office, multifamily, mixed-use, and hotel properties
represented 29.8%, 47.5%, 4.1%, and 2.2% of the pool balance,
respectively. As of July 2022, the majority of loans are secured by
properties in suburban and urban markets. Loans representing 36.8%
of the pool are secured by properties in markets with a DBRS
Morningstar Market Rank of 4 and loans representing 48.8% of the
pool are secured by properties in markets with DBRS Morningstar
Market Ranks of 6, 7, or 8. At issuance, 66.7% of the loans were
secured by properties in suburban and urban markets, as 42.9% of
the pool had DBRS Morningstar Market Ranks of 4 or 5 and 23.9% of
the pool had DBRS Morningstar Market Ranks of 6, 7, or 8. The
current poolwide weighted-average as-is loan-to-value (LTV) and
stabilized LTV ratios are 65.9% and 63.6%, respectively, compared
with the issuance as-is and stabilized LTV ratios of 74.6% and
62.2%, respectively.

There are no loans in special servicing and five loans on the
servicer's watchlist, representing 26.4% of the pool balance. These
loans are being monitored mainly for upcoming maturity, although
the majority of the loans in the transaction, including loans not
on the servicer's watchlist, have exercised the first or second
extension options with all loans having a fully extended maturity
date in 2024. There is one loan on the servicer's watchlist,
Palihotel Seattle (Prospectus ID#16, 5.3% of pool), that is being
monitored for a low debt service coverage ratio as performance
continues to rebound following the impacts of the Coronavirus
Disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Four loans, representing 34.9% of the
pool, were modified or the borrowers were granted a forbearance. In
each, relief was granted to performance issues arising from
complications of the pandemic.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



PFP 2021-8: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on Class G Notes
--------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited confirmed its ratings on all classes of notes issued
by PFP 2021-8, Ltd. as follows:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class G at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating confirmations reflect the overall stable performance of
the transaction, which remains in line with DBRS Morningstar's
issuance expectations. In conjunction with this press release, DBRS
Morningstar has published a Surveillance Performance Update report
with in-depth analysis and credit metrics for the transaction and
with business plan updates on select loans. For access to this
report, please click on the link under Related Documents below or
contact us at info@dbrsmorningstar.com.

At issuance, the collateral consisted of 46 floating-rate mortgages
secured by 55 mostly transitional commercial real estate properties
totalling approximately $1.1 billion, excluding approximately
$125.9 million of future funding commitments. Most loans were in a
period of transition with plans to stabilize and improve asset
value. The transaction is structured with a Replenishment Period
through the September 2024 Payment Date, whereby the Issuer has the
right to use principal proceeds to acquire related fully funded
future funding participations subject to stated criteria. The
transaction will pay sequentially following the end of the
Replenishment Period.

As of the July 2022 remittance, the pool comprises 44 loans secured
by 53 properties with a cumulative trust balance of $1.1 billion.
Since issuance, two loans with a former cumulative trust balance of
$67.7 million have been successfully repaid from the pool. As of
the July 2022 remittance, there was $15.0 million available in the
Permitted Funded Companion Participation Acquisition account.

Most borrowers are progressing toward completing the stated
business plans as through June 2022, the collateral manager had
advanced $41.9 million in loan future funding to 21 individual
borrowers since the transaction closed in September 2021. The
majority of this amount has been released to the borrower of the
Fort Collins Portfolio loan ($11.2 million) to fund capital
improvements. An additional $86.9 million of loan future funding
allocated to 29 borrowers to further aid in property stabilization
efforts remains outstanding. The majority of this potential funding
is allocated to the borrowers of the River Centre Office Campus
loan ($17.9 million) and the Greenwood Corporate Plaza loan ($10.4
million) to fund capital improvements and leasing costs.

The collateral pool is concentrated by property type as 20 loans,
representing 58.5% of the cumulative loan balance, are secured by
multifamily properties and 11 loans, representing 19.8% of the
cumulative loan balance, are secured by office properties. By
geographical concentration, the collateral is most heavily
concentrated in California and Colorado, with loans representing
25.0% and 13.5% of the cumulative loan balance, respectively. Five
loans, representing 16.6% of the cumulative trust balance, are in
urban markets with DBRS Morningstar Market Ranks of 6, 7, and 8.
These markets have historically shown greater liquidity and demand.
There are 21 loans, representing 42.7% of the cumulative loan
balance, secured by properties in markets with a DBRS Morningstar
Market Rank of 3 or 4, which are suburban in nature and have
historically had higher probability of default levels when compared
with properties in urban markets.

As of the July 2022 reporting, all loans remain current with no
loans on the servicer's watchlist or in special servicing. There
have been two loans, representing 3.1% of the pool balance, that
have reported loan modifications. The San Carlos Tech Center loan
was modified to allow for the early termination of a tenant lease.
In conjunction with the lease termination, the borrower agreed to
deposit funds into a cash collateral reserve equal to the amount of
rent beyond the termination date. The 970 Stewart loan was modified
in order to activate cash management provisions.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



RFM REREMIC 2022-FRR1: DBRS Gives Prov. B(low) Rating on 3 Classes
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following classes of
Multifamily Mortgage-Backed Certificates, Series 2022-FRR1 to be
issued by RFM RE-REMIC TRUST 2022-FRR1:

-- Class AK55 at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class BK55 at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class AB55 at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class CK55 at B (low) (sf)
-- Class AK60 at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class BK60 at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class AB60 at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class CK60 at B (low) (sf)
-- Class AK64 at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class BK64 at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class AB64 at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class CK64 at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

This transaction is a resecuritization collateralized by the
beneficial interests in seven commercial mortgage-backed
pass-through certificates from three underlying transactions: FREMF
2016-K55 Mortgage Trust, Multifamily Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2016-K55; FREMF 2016-K60 Mortgage Trust,
Multifamily Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-K60;
and FREMF 2017-K64 Mortgage Trust, Multifamily Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-K64. The ratings are
dependent on the performance of the underlying transactions.

There were no Environmental/Social/Governance factor(s) that had a
significant or relevant effect on the credit analysis.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



RR 22 LTD: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to $700,000 Class E Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned ratings to three classes of
notes issued by RR 22 LTD (the "Issuer" or "RR 22").

Moody's rating action is as follows:

- US$288,000,000 Class A-1 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes
   due 2035, Assigned Aaa (sf)

- US$33,075,000 Class A-2 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes
   due 2035, Assigned Aa2 (sf)

- US$700,000 Class E Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes
   due 2035, Assigned B3 (sf)

The notes listed are referred to herein, collectively, as the
"Rated Notes."

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on Moody's methodology and
considers all relevant risks, particularly those associated with
the CLO's portfolio and structure.

RR 22 is a managed cash flow CLO. The issued notes will be
collateralized primarily by broadly syndicated senior secured
corporate loans. At least 92.5% of the portfolio must consist of
senior secured loans and eligible investments, and up to 7.5% of
the portfolio may consist of second-lien loans, unsecured loans and
permitted non-loan assets. The portfolio is approximately 100%
ramped as of the closing date.

Redding Ridge Asset Management LLC (the "Manager") will direct the
selection, acquisition and disposition of the assets on behalf of
the Issuer and may engage in trading activity, including
discretionary trading, during the transaction's three year
reinvestment period. Thereafter, subject to certain restrictions,
the Manager may reinvest unscheduled principal payments and
proceeds from sales of credit risk assets.

In addition to the Rated Notes, the Issuer issued five other
classes of secured notes and one class of subordinated notes.

The transaction incorporates interest and par coverage tests which,
if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to pay down
the notes in order of seniority.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in Section 2.3.2.1
of the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan
Obligations" rating methodology published in December 2021.

For modeling purposes, Moody's used the following base-case
assumptions:

Par amount: $450,000,000

Diversity Score: 50

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2986

Weighted Average Spread (WAS): SOFR + 3.35%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 48.0%

Weighted Average Life (WAL):  7.19 years

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2021.

Factors That Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the Rated Notes is subject to uncertainty. The
performance of the Rated Notes is sensitive to the performance of
the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. The Manager's investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
performance of the Rated Notes.


SPSS 2021-A LLC: DBRS Confirms BB Rating on Class D Securities
--------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. confirmed its ratings on the following securities issued
by SPSS 2021-A LLC:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at A (sf)
-- Class C at BBB (sf)
-- Class D at BB (sf)

The rating actions are based on the following analytical
considerations:

-- The transaction assumptions consider DBRS Morningstar's
baseline macroeconomic scenarios for rated sovereign economies,
available in its commentary Baseline Macroeconomic Scenarios For
Rated Sovereigns - June 2022 Update, published on June 29, 2022.
These baseline macroeconomic scenarios replace DBRS Morningstar's
moderate and adverse Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic
scenarios, which were first published in April 2020.

-- The generally high credit quality of annuity providers and
their improved capitalization positions and risk management
frameworks, which have been enhanced since the global financial
crisis of 2008–09.

-- The ability of the transaction to withstand stresses in the
cash flow scenarios and repay investors in accordance with the
terms of the transaction.

-- The transaction parties' capabilities with regard to
origination, underwriting, and servicing.

-- The transaction's capital structure, and form and sufficiency
of available credit enhancement.

-- The transaction's performance to date, with minimal defaults
and zero losses.

Notes: The principal methodology is DBRS Morningstar Master U.S.
ABS Surveillance (May 16, 2022), which can be found on
dbrsmorningstar.com under Methodologies & Criteria.



STACR 2020-HQA5: Moody's Ups Rating on Cl. B-1 Bonds to Ba1
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Servicehas upgraded the ratings of 43 bonds from
Freddie Mac STACR REMIC Trust 2020-HQA2 (STACR 2020-HQA2) and
Freddie Mac STACR REMIC Trust 2020-HQA5 (STACR 2020-HQA5).

STACR 2020-HQA2 and STACR 2020-HQA5 are both high-LTV transactions
that benefit from mortgage insurance. In addition, the credit risk
exposure of the notes depends on the actual realized losses and
modification losses incurred by the reference pool.

The complete rating actions are as follows:

Issuer: Freddie Mac STACR REMIC Trust 2020-HQA2

Cl. M-2, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021 Upgraded
to Ba1 (sf)

Cl. M-2B, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2BI*, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2BR, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2BS, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2BT, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2BU, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2I*, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba1 (sf)

Cl. M-2R, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba1 (sf)

Cl. M-2RB, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2S, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba1 (sf)

Cl. M-2SB, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2T, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba1 (sf)

Cl. M-2TB, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2U, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba1 (sf)

Cl. M-2UB, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Nov 17, 2021
Upgraded to Ba2 (sf)

Issuer: Freddie Mac STACR REMIC Trust 2020-HQA5

Cl. B-1, Upgraded to Ba1 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Ba3 (sf)

Cl. B-1A, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Ba1 (sf)

Cl. B-1AI*, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021
Upgraded to Ba1 (sf)

Cl. B-1AR, Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021
Upgraded to Ba1 (sf)

Cl. B-1B, Upgraded to Ba2 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to B1 (sf)

Cl. M-2, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded to
Baa1 (sf)

Cl. M-2A, Upgraded to A1 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to A3 (sf)

Cl. M-2AI*, Upgraded to A1 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to A3 (sf)

Cl. M-2AR, Upgraded to A1 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to A3 (sf)

Cl. M-2AS, Upgraded to A1 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to A3 (sf)

Cl. M-2AT, Upgraded to A1 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to A3 (sf)

Cl. M-2AU, Upgraded to A1 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to A3 (sf)

Cl. M-2B, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa2 (sf)

Cl.M-2BI*, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa2 (sf)

Cl. M-2BR, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa2 (sf)

Cl. M-2BS, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa2 (sf)

Cl. M-2BT, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa2 (sf)

Cl. M-2BU, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa2 (sf)

Cl. M-2I*, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa1 (sf)

Cl. M-2R, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa1 (sf)

Cl. M-2RB, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa2 (sf)

Cl. M-2S, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa1 (sf)

Cl. M-2SB, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa2 (sf)

Cl. M-2T, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa1 (sf)

Cl. M-2TB, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa2 (sf)

Cl. M-2U, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa1 (sf)

Cl. M-2UB, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on Oct 7, 2021 Upgraded
to Baa2 (sf)

*Reflects Interest-Only Classes

A List of Affected Credit Ratings is available at
https://bit.ly/3bDkX2M

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rating upgrades reflect the increased levels of credit
enhancement available to the bonds, the recent performance, and
Moody's updated loss expectations on the underlying pool. In this
transaction, high prepayment rates averaging 19%-28% over the last
six months, have benefited the bonds by increasing the paydown and
building credit enhancement.

In Moody's analysis Moody's considered the additional risk posed by
borrowers enrolled in payment relief programs. Moody's increased
Moody's MILAN model-derived median expected losses by 15% and
Moody's Aaa losses by 5% to reflect the performance deterioration
resulting from a slowdown in US economic activity due to the
COVID-19 outbreak.

For transactions where more than 4% of the loans in pool have been
enrolled in payment relief programs for more than 3 months, Moody's
further increased the expected loss to account for the rising risk
of potential deferral losses to the subordinate bonds. Moody's also
considered higher adjustments for transactions where more than 10%
of the pool is either currently enrolled or was previously enrolled
in a payment relief program. Specifically, Moody's account for the
marginally increased probability of default for borrowers that have
either been enrolled in a payment relief program for more than 3
months or have already received a loan modification, including a
deferral, since the start of the pandemic.

Moody's estimated the proportion of loans granted payment relief in
a pool based on a review of loan level cashflows. In Moody's
analysis, Moody's considered a loan to be enrolled in a payment
relief program if (1) the loan was not liquidated but took a loss
in the reporting period (to account for loans with monthly
deferrals that were reported as current), or (2) the actual balance
of the loan increased in the reporting period, or (3) the actual
balance of the loan remained unchanged in the last and current
reporting period, excluding interest-only loans and pay ahead
loans. Based on Moody's analysis, the proportion of borrowers that
are enrolled in payment relief plans in the underlying pool ranged
between 1.15% - 3.48% over the last six months.

Moody's updated loss expectations on the pools incorporate, amongst
other factors, Moody's assessment of the representations and
warranties frameworks of the transactions, the due diligence
findings of the third-party reviews received at the time of
issuance, and the strength of the transaction's originators and
servicer.

In response to the COVID-19-spurred economic shock, the GSEs have
enacted temporary policies that allow servicers to offer payment
forbearance to borrowers impacted by COVID-19. The GSEs report
these loans that are granted forbearance as delinquent for purposes
of CRT transactions despite suspension of reporting borrowers to
the credit bureaus. Additionally, delinquencies caused by COVID-19
qualify for "natural disaster" treatment, and the transaction
provide a grace period for such loans before they are recognized as
a Credit Event Reference Obligation (when the loans become 180 day
or more delinquent). The losses are allocated based on actual
losses incurred upon liquidation of defaulted mortgage loans in the
reference pool (i.e., "actual loss" transaction) and these losses
are allocated to bondholders, reverse sequentially.

Principal Methodologies

The principal methodology used in rating all classes except
interest-only classes was "Moody's Approach to Rating US RMBS Using
the MILAN Framework" published in July 2022.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

Up

Levels of credit protection that are higher than necessary to
protect investors against current expectations of loss could drive
the ratings of the subordinate bonds up. Losses could decline from
Moody's original expectations as a result of a lower number of
obligor defaults or appreciation in the value of the mortgaged
property securing an obligor's promise of payment. Transaction
performance also depends greatly on the US macro economy and
housing market.

Down

Levels of credit protection that are insufficient to protect
investors against current expectations of loss could drive the
ratings down. Losses could rise above Moody's expectations as a
result of a higher number of obligor defaults or deterioration in
the value of the mortgaged property securing an obligor's promise
of payment. Transaction performance also depends greatly on the US
macro economy and housing market. Other reasons for
worse-than-expected performance include poor servicing, error on
the part of transaction parties, inadequate transaction governance
and fraud.

Finally, performance of RMBS continues to remain highly dependent
on servicer procedures. Any change resulting from servicing
transfers or other policy or regulatory change can impact the
performance of these transactions. In addition, improvements in
reporting formats and data availability across deals and trustees
may provide better insight into certain performance metrics such as
the level of collateral modifications.


STACR 2022-HQA3: Moody's Gives (P)Ba3 Rating to 10 Tranches
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned provisional ratings to 24
classes of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) issued by
Freddie Mac STACR Remic Trust 2022-HQA3, and sponsored by Freddie
Mac.

The securities reference a pool of mortgage loans acquired by
Freddie Mac, and originated and serviced by multiple entities.

The complete rating actions are as follows:

Issuer: Freddie Mac STACR Remic Trust 2022-HQA3

Cl. M-1A, Assigned (P)A2 (sf)

Cl. M-1B, Assigned (P)Baa3 (sf)

Cl. M-2A, Assigned (P)Ba1 (sf)

Cl. M-2B, Assigned (P)Ba3 (sf)

Cl. M-2, Assigned (P)Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2R, Assigned (P)Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2S, Assigned (P)Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2T, Assigned (P)Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2U, Assigned (P)Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2I*, Assigned (P)Ba2 (sf)

Cl. M-2AR, Assigned (P)Ba1 (sf)

Cl. M-2AS, Assigned (P)Ba1 (sf)

Cl. M-2AT, Assigned (P)Ba1 (sf)

Cl. M-2AU, Assigned (P)Ba1 (sf)

Cl. M-2AI*, Assigned (P)Ba1 (sf)

Cl. M-2BR, Assigned (P)Ba3 (sf)

Cl. M-2BS, Assigned (P)Ba3 (sf)

Cl. M-2BT, Assigned (P)Ba3 (sf)

Cl. M-2BU, Assigned (P)Ba3 (sf)

Cl. M-2BI*, Assigned (P)Ba3 (sf)

Cl. M-2RB, Assigned (P)Ba3 (sf)

Cl. M-2SB, Assigned (P)Ba3 (sf)

Cl. M-2TB, Assigned (P)Ba3 (sf)

Cl. M-2UB, Assigned (P)Ba3 (sf)

*Reflects Interest-Only Classes

RATINGS RATIONALE

The ratings are based on the credit quality of the mortgage loans,
the structural features of the transaction, the origination quality
and the servicing arrangement, the third-party review, and the
representations and warranties framework.

Moody's expected loss for this pool in a baseline scenario-mean is
0.90%, in a baseline scenario-median is 0.70% and reaches 4.43% at
a stress level consistent with Moody's Aaa rating.

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in rating all classes except
interest-only classes was "Moody's Approach to Rating US RMBS Using
the MILAN Framework" published in July 2022.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

Up

Levels of credit protection that are higher than necessary to
protect investors against current expectations of loss could drive
the ratings up. Losses could decline from Moody's original
expectations as a result of a lower number of obligor defaults or
appreciation in the value of the mortgaged property securing an
obligor's promise of payment. Transaction performance also depends
greatly on the US macro economy and housing market.

Down

Levels of credit protection that are insufficient to protect
investors against current expectations of loss could drive the
ratings down. Losses could rise above Moody's original expectations
as a result of a higher number of obligor defaults or deterioration
in the value of the mortgaged property securing an obligor's
promise of payment. Transaction performance also depends greatly on
the US macro economy and housing market. Other reasons for
worse-than-expected performance include poor servicing, error on
the part of transaction parties, inadequate transaction governance
and fraud.

Finally, performance of RMBS continues to remain highly dependent
on servicer procedures. Any change resulting from servicing
transfers or other policy or regulatory change can impact the
performance of these transactions. In addition, improvements in
reporting formats and data availability across deals and trustees
may provide better insight into certain performance metrics such as
the level of collateral modifications.


TIKEHAU US II: Moody's Assigns Ba3 Rating to $13.8MM Class E Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned ratings to four classes of
notes issued by Tikehau US CLO II Ltd. (the "Issuer" or "Tikehau
II").

Moody's rating action is as follows:

US$159,000,000 Class A-1N Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2033, Assigned Aaa (sf)

US$49,000,000 Class A-1F Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes due 2033,
Assigned Aaa (sf)

US$9,750,000 Class AJ Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2033,
Assigned Aaa (sf)

US$13,812,500 Class E Junior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes
due 2033, Assigned Ba3 (sf)

The notes listed are referred to herein, collectively, as the
"Rated Notes."

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on Moody's methodology and
considers all relevant risks, particularly those associated with
the CLO's portfolio and structure.

Tikehau II is a managed cash flow CLO. The issued notes will be
collateralized primarily by broadly syndicated senior secured
corporate loans. At least 95.0% of the portfolio must consist of
senior secured loans, cash, and eligible investments, and up to
5.0% of the portfolio may consist of second-lien loans, unsecured
loans, and permitted debt securities. The portfolio is
approximately 90% ramped as of the closing date.

Tikehau Structured Credit Management LLC (the "Manager") will
direct the selection, acquisition and disposition of the assets on
behalf of the Issuer and may engage in trading activity, including
discretionary trading, during the transaction's four year
reinvestment period. Thereafter, subject to certain restrictions,
the Manager may reinvest unscheduled principal payments and
proceeds from sales of credit risk assets.

In addition to the Rated Notes, the Issuer issued five other
classes of secured notes and one class of subordinated notes.

The transaction incorporates interest and par coverage tests which,
if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to pay down
the notes in order of seniority.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in Section 2.3.2.1
of the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan
Obligations" rating methodology published in December 2021.

For modeling purposes, Moody's used the following base-case
assumptions:

Par amount: $325,000,000

Diversity Score: 75

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2591

Weighted Average Spread (WAS): SOFR + 3.50%

Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 6.00%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 48.0%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 6.95 years

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2021.

Factors That Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the Rated Notes is subject to uncertainty. The
performance of the Rated Notes is sensitive to the performance of
the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. The Manager's investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
performance of the Rated Notes.


TOWD POINT 2022-1: DBRS Finalizes B(high) Rating on Class B2 Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. finalized its provisional ratings on the Asset-Backed
Securities, Series 2022-1 issued by Towd Point Mortgage Trust
2022-1 (TPMT 2022-1 or the Trust) as follows:

-- $423.5 million Class A1 at AAA (sf)
-- $27.8 million Class A2 at AA (high) (sf)
-- $12.4 million Class M1 at A (sf)
-- $8.9 million Class M2 at BBB (sf)
-- $6.5 million Class B1 at BB (high) (sf)
-- $4.0 million Class B2 at B (high) (sf)
-- $423.5 million Class A1A at AAA (sf)
-- $423.5 million Class A1AX at AAA (sf)
-- $423.5 million Class A1B at AAA (sf)
-- $423.5 million Class A1BX at AAA (sf)
-- $27.8 million Class A2A at AA (high) (sf)
-- $27.8 million Class A2AX at AA (high) (sf)
-- $27.8 million Class A2B at AA (high) (sf)
-- $27.8 million Class A2BX at AA (high) (sf)
-- $27.8 million Class A2C at AA (high) (sf)
-- $27.8 million Class A2CX at AA (high) (sf)
-- $12.4 million Class M1A at A (sf)
-- $12.4 million Class M1AX at A (sf)
-- $12.4 million Class M1B at A (sf)
-- $12.4 million Class M1BX at A (sf)
-- $12.4 million Class M1C at A (sf)
-- $12.4 million Class M1CX at A (sf)
-- $8.9 million Class M2A at BBB (sf)
-- $8.9 million Class M2AX at BBB (sf)
-- $8.9 million Class M2B at BBB (sf)
-- $8.9 million Class M2BX at BBB (sf)
-- $8.9 million Class M2C at BBB (sf)
-- $8.9 million Class M2CX at BBB (sf)

Classes A1AX, A1BX, A2AX, A2BX, A2CX, M1AX, M1BX, M1CX, M2AX, M2BX,
and M2CX are interest-only (IO) notes. The class balances represent
notional amounts.

Classes A1A, A1AX, A1B, A1BX, A2A, A2AX, A2B, A2BX, A2C, A2CX, M1A,
M1AX, M1B, M1BX, M1C, M1CX, M2A, M2AX, M2B, M2BX, M2C, and M2CX are
exchangeable notes. These classes can be exchanged for combinations
of exchange notes as specified in the offering documents.

The AAA (sf) rating on the Notes reflects 14.80% of credit
enhancement provided by subordinated certificates. The AA (high)
(sf), A (sf), BBB (sf), BB (high) (sf), and B (high) (sf) ratings
reflect 9.20%, 6.70%, 4.90%, 3.60%, and 2.80% of credit
enhancement, respectively.

Other than the specified classes above, DBRS Morningstar does not
rate any other classes in this transaction.

This transaction is a securitization of a portfolio of
predominantly seasoned performing and reperforming first-lien
mortgages funded by the issuance of the Notes. The Notes are backed
by 2,812 loans with a total principal balance $497,063,099 as of
the Cut-Off Date (June 30, 2022).

The Notes are backed by 2,861 loans with a total principal balance
$507,531,788 as of the Statistical Calculation Date (May 31, 2022).
Unless specified otherwise, all the statistics regarding the
mortgage loans in this report are based on the Statistical
Calculation Date.

The portfolio is approximately 186 months seasoned, and all loans
are more than 24 months seasoned. Modified loans make up 63.9% of
the portfolio, and modifications happened more than two years ago
for 94.4% of those loans. Within the pool, 782 mortgages, equating
to approximately 5.0% of the total principal balance, have
non-interest-bearing deferred amounts. No Home Affordable
Modification Program or proprietary principal forgiveness amounts
are included in the deferred amounts.

As of the Statistical Calculation Date, 97.7% of the pool is
current and 2.3% is 30 days delinquent under the Mortgage Bankers
Association (MBA) delinquency method. Additionally, 0.3% of the
pool is in bankruptcy (all non-pandemic bankruptcy loans are
performing or are 30 days delinquent). Approximately 83.4% of the
mortgage loans have been zero times 30 days delinquent under the
MBA delinquency for at least the past 24 months.

The majority of the pool (99.9%) is exempt from the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau Ability-to-Repay (ATR)/Qualified
Mortgage (QM) rules. The loans subject to the ATR rules are
designated as QM Safe Harbor (0.1%) and Temporary QM Safe Harbor
(


TOWD POINT 2022-2: DBRS Gives Prov. BB Rating on Class B1 Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the Asset-Backed
Securities, Series 2022-2 to be issued by Towd Point Mortgage Trust
2022-2 (TPMT 2022-2 or the Trust) as follows:

-- $426.7 million Class A1 at AAA (sf)
-- $23.5 million Class A2 at AA (low) (sf)
-- $11.3 million Class M1 at A (low) (sf)
-- $7.4 million Class M2 at BBB (low) (sf)
-- $5.4 million Class B1 at BB (sf)
-- $3.4 million Class B2 at B (high) (sf)
-- $426.7 million Class A1A at AAA (sf)
-- $426.7 million Class A1AX at AAA (sf)
-- $426.7 million Class A1B at AAA (sf)
-- $426.7 million Class A1BX at AAA (sf)
-- $23.5 million Class A2A at AA (low) (sf)
-- $23.5 million Class A2AX at AA (low) (sf)
-- $23.5 million Class A2B at AA (low) (sf)
-- $23.5 million Class A2BX at AA (low) (sf)
-- $23.5 million Class A2C at AA (low) (sf)
-- $23.5 million Class A2CX at AA (low) (sf)
-- $11.3 million Class M1A at A (low) (sf)
-- $11.3 million Class M1AX at A (low) (sf)
-- $11.3 million Class M1B at A (low) (sf)
-- $11.3 million Class M1BX at A (low) (sf)
-- $11.3 million Class M1C at A (low) (sf)
-- $11.3 million Class M1CX at A (low) (sf)
-- $7.4 million Class M2A at BBB (low) (sf)
-- $7.4 million Class M2AX at BBB (low) (sf)
-- $7.4 million Class M2B at BBB (low) (sf)
-- $7.4 million Class M2BX at BBB (low) (sf)
-- $7.4 million Class M2C at BBB (low) (sf)
-- $7.4 million Class M2CX at BBB (low) (sf)

Classes A1AX, A1BX, A2AX, A2BX, A2CX, M1AX, M1BX, M1CX, M2AX, M2BX,
and M2CX are interest-only notes. The class balances represent
notional amounts.

Classes A1A, A1AX, A1B, A1BX, A2A, A2AX, A2B, A2BX, A2C, A2CX, M1A,
M1AX, M1B, M1BX, M1C, M1CX, M2A, M2AX, M2B, M2BX, M2C, and M2CX are
exchangeable notes. These classes can be exchanged for combinations
of exchange notes as specified in the offering documents.

The AAA (sf) rating on the Notes reflects 13.00% of credit
enhancement provided by subordinated certificates. The AA (low)
(sf), A (low) (sf), BBB (low) (sf), BB (sf), and B (high) (sf)
ratings reflect 8.20%, 5.90%, 4.40%, 3.30%, and 2.60% of credit
enhancement, respectively.

Other than the specified classes above, DBRS Morningstar does not
rate any other classes in this transaction.

This transaction is a securitization of a portfolio of
predominantly seasoned performing and reperforming first-lien
mortgages funded by the issuance of asset-backed notes (the Notes).
The Notes are backed by 2,931 loans with a total principal balance
$490,489,663 as of the Cut-Off Date (June 30, 2022).

The portfolio is approximately 189 months seasoned, and 99.9% of
the loans are greater than 24 months seasoned. The portfolio
contains 67.4% modified loans, and modifications happened more than
two years ago for 92.4% of the modified loans. Within the pool, 847
mortgages, equating to approximately 4.8% of the total principal
balance, have non-interest-bearing deferred amounts. There are no
Home Affordable Modification Program and proprietary principal
forgiveness amounts included in the deferred amounts.

As of the Cut-Off Date, 97.9% of the pool is current and 2.1% is 30
days delinquent under the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA)
delinquency method. Additionally, 0.3% of the pool is in bankruptcy
(all non-pandemic-related bankruptcy loans are performing or 30
days delinquent). Approximately 83.6% of the mortgage loans have
been zero times 30 days delinquent (0 x 30) for at least the past
24 months under the MBA delinquency method.

The majority of the pool (99.9%) is exempt from the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau's Ability-to-Repay (ATR)/Qualified
Mortgage (QM) rules. The loans subject to the ATR rules are
designated as QM Safe Harbor (


UBSCM 2018-NYCH: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on Class G Certs
-------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited confirmed the ratings on the Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-NYCH issued by UBSCM
2018-NYCH Mortgage Trust as follows:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (high) (sf)
-- Class C at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class X-NCP at A (sf)
-- Class D at A (low) (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class G at B (low) (sf)

DBRS Morningstar changed the trends on Classes F and G to Stable
from Negative. All other classes have Stable trends. The rating
confirmations and trend changes reflect the overall improved
performance of the collateral as it continues to recover from the
effects of the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic.

The transaction is collateralized by a $300.0 million
floating-rate, interest-only (IO) mortgage loan that is secured by
the fee-simple interests on seven recently renovated
limited-service and extended-stay hotels in New York City totalling
1,087 rooms. The loan had an initial term of three years with two
one-year extension options with an initial maturity date of
February 2021. Individual properties in the portfolio may be
released subject to certain provisions, including a paydown in
principal on the loan equal to 115% of the allocated loan amount
for the released hotel(s). As of the July 2022 remittance, no
properties have been released.

As a result of the coronavirus pandemic and its forced shutdown of
the economy, the loan was transferred to special servicing in April
2020. The loan payments for April and May 2020, and subsequent
months, were made by the mezzanine lender and the borrower
requested a forbearance and an extension of the maturity date.
Although the loan was structured with two conditional one-year
extension options remaining, the collateral did not meet the
required debt yield requirements to extend the maturity date.

The mezzanine lender ultimately foreclosed on the portfolio in
early 2021. The mezzanine lender brought the senior loan payments
current and received a modification in June 2021, extending the
maturity date to February 2024. The modification required a paydown
of $10.0 million and partial payment of default interest. The loan
was returned to the master servicer in September 2021 as a
corrected mortgage because the borrower brought the loan current,
according to the servicer. The loan has remained on the servicer's
watchlist since September 2021 because of sustained cash flow
declines resulting from the residual effects of the pandemic.
Because of the low debt yield, the note is trapping cash and, as of
the July 2022 reporting, the loan reported $9.0 million in the
capital reserve account and an additional $6.9 million in the other
reserve account.

The seven hotels are in Manhattan submarkets that typically have
very active lodging demand: Times Square (three hotels), the
Financial District (two hotels), and one hotel in each of Chelsea
and Herald Square. The midmarket hotels are flagged with well-known
brands: Hampton Inn (three hotels), Holiday Inn Express (two
hotels), Holiday Inn, and Candlewood Suites. At issuance, occupancy
rates at the properties ranged from 90% to 95% with average daily
rates (ADR) ranging from $198 to $229 per room, and revenue per
available room (RevPAR) of $212. The sponsor invested $15.2
million, or $13,983 per room, for a portfolio-wide property
improvement plan renovation that took place from 2016 to 2017.

According to the most recent reporting, occupancy, ADR, and RevPAR
metrics have improved, yet remain below pre-pandemic levels. The
portfolio reported an occupancy rate of 51.2% as of March 2022,
which is an improvement from the June 2021 occupancy rate of 40%.
As of the March 2022 Operations Statement, the portfolio reported
year-to-date (YTD) ADR and RevPAR of $128.46 and $65.81,
respectively, compared with its YTD March 2021 ADR and RevPAR of
$115.10 and $36.19, respectively. The Q2 2021 debt service coverage
ratio (DSCR) was reported at -0.50 times (x), compared with the
DSCR at issuance of 2.18x. However, the loan has remained current
since September 2021.

The June 2021 appraisal reported a value of $357.5 million,
representing a decline of 38.4% compared with the $580.7 million
value at issuance. Even with this significant decline, the new
value remains above the outstanding loan balance, providing some
insulation for the bottom-rated classes. Additionally, DBRS
Morningstar finds comfort in the mezzanine lender's commitment to
the property.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



UPSTART SECURITIZATION 2022-4: Moody's Gives '(P)Ba2' to B Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned provisional ratings to the
notes to be issued by Upstart Securitization Trust 2022-4 ("UPST
2022-4"), the fourth personal loan securitization issued from the
UPST shelf this year. The collateral backing UPST 2022-4 consists
of unsecured consumer installment loans originated by Cross River
Bank, a New Jersey state-chartered commercial bank and FinWise
Bank, a Utah state-chartered commercial bank, all utilizing the
Upstart Program, respectively. Upstart Network, Inc. ("Upstart")
will act as the servicer of the loans.

The complete rating actions are as follows:

Issuer: Upstart Securitization Trust 2022-4

Class A Notes, Assigned (P)A3 (sf)

Class B Notes, Assigned (P)Ba2 (sf)
       
RATINGS RATIONALE

The ratings are based on the quality of the underlying collateral
and its expected performance, the strength of the capital structure
and fast amortization of the assets, the experience and expertise
of Upstart as servicer, and the back-up servicing arrangement with
Wilmington Trust, National Association ("Wilmington") and its
designated sub-agent, Systems & Services Technologies, Inc. (S&ST
unrated).

Moody's median cumulative net loss expectation for the 2022-4 pool
is 16.9% and the stress loss is 58.0%. Moody's based its cumulative
net loss expectation on an analysis of the credit quality of the
underlying collateral; the historical performance of similar
collateral, including securitization performance and managed
portfolio performance; the ability of Upstart to perform its
servicing functions; the ability of Wilmington and its sub-agent to
perform the backup servicing functions; and current expectations
for the macroeconomic environment during the life of the
transaction.

At closing, the Class A and Class B notes are expected to benefit
from 32.5% and 20.5% of hard credit enhancement respectively. Hard
credit enhancement for the notes consists of a combination of
overcollateralization, a non-declining reserve account and
subordination for the Class A notes. The notes may also benefit
from excess spread.

The social risk for this transaction is high. Marketplace lenders
have attracted elevated levels of regulatory attention at the state
and federal level. As such, regulatory and borrower challenges to
marketplace lenders and their third-party lending partners over
"true lender" status and interest rate exportation could result in
some of Upstart's loans being deemed void or unenforceable, in
whole or in part.

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's
Approach to Rating Consumer Loan-Backed ABS" published in July
2022.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

Up

Moody's could upgrade the notes if, given current expectations of
portfolio losses, levels of credit enhancement are consistent with
higher ratings. In sequential pay structures, such as the one in
this transaction, credit enhancement grows as a percentage of the
collateral balance as collections pay down senior notes. Moody's
expectation of pool losses could decline as a result of better than
expected improvements in the economy, changes to servicing
practices that enhance collections or refinancing opportunities
that result in prepayments. In addition, greater certainty
concerning the legal and regulatory risks facing this transaction
could lead to lower loss volatility assumptions, and thus lead to
an upgrade of the notes.

Down

Moody's could downgrade the ratings of the notes if pool losses
exceed its expectations and levels of credit enhancement are
consistent with lower ratings. Credit enhancement could decline if
excess spread is not sufficient to cover losses in a given month.
Moody's expectation of pool losses may increase, for example, due
to performance deterioration stemming from a downturn in the US
economy, deficient servicing, errors on the part of transaction
parties, inadequate transaction governance or fraud. In addition,
the legal and regulatory risks stemming from the bank partner model
that Upstart utilizes could expose the pool to increased losses.


VELOCITY COMMERCIAL 2022-4: DBRS Gives Prov. B Rating on 3 Classes
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the Mortgage-Backed
Certificates, Series 2022-4 to be issued by Velocity Commercial
Capital Loan Trust 2022-4 (VCC 2022-4 or the Issuer) as follows:

-- $193.1 million Class A at AAA (sf)
-- $193.1 million Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- $193.1 million Class A-IO at AAA (sf)
-- $23.7 million Class M-1 at AA (sf)
-- $23.7 million Class M1-A at AA (sf)
-- $23.7 million Class M1-IO at AA (sf)
-- $12.7 million Class M-2 at A (low) (sf)
-- $12.7 million Class M2-A at A (low) (sf)
-- $12.7 million Class M2-IO at A (low) (sf)
-- $21.8 million Class M-3 at BBB (sf)
-- $21.8 million Class M3-A at BBB (sf)
-- $21.8 million Class M3-IO at BBB (sf)
-- $45.0 million Class M-4 at BB (sf)
-- $45.0 million Class M4-A at BB (sf)
-- $45.0 million Class M4-IO at BB (sf)
-- $20.2 million Class M-5 at B (sf)
-- $20.2 million Class M5-A at B (sf)
-- $20.2 million Class M5-IO at B (sf)

Classes A-IO, M1-IO, M2-IO, M3-IO, M4-IO, and M5-IO are
interest-only (IO) certificates. The class balances represent
notional amounts.

Classes A, M-1, M-2, M-3, M-4, and M-5 are exchangeable
certificates. These classes can be exchanged for combinations of
initial exchangeable certificates as specified in the offering
documents.

The AAA (sf) ratings on the Certificates reflect 42.10% of credit
enhancement (CE) provided by subordinated certificates. The AA
(sf), A (low) (sf), BBB (sf), BB (sf), and B (sf) ratings reflect
35.00%, 31.20%, 24.65%, 11.15%, and 5.10% of CE, respectively.

Other than the classes specified above, DBRS Morningstar does not
rate any other classes in this transaction.

VCC 2022-4 is a securitization of a portfolio of newly originated
and seasoned fixed- and adjustable-rate, first-lien residential
mortgages collateralized by investor properties with one to four
units (residential investor loans) and small-balance commercial
mortgages (SBC) collateralized by various types of commercial,
multifamily rental, and mixed-use properties. The securitization is
funded by the issuance of the Mortgage-Backed Certificates, Series
2022-4. The Certificates are backed by 782 mortgage loans with a
total principal balance of $333,547,047 as of the Cut-Off Date
(July 1, 2022).

Approximately 51.9% of the pool comprises residential investor
loans and about 48.1% of SBC loans. All except one loan in this
securitization (i.e., 99.5%) were originated by Velocity Commercial
Capital, LLC (Velocity or VCC). The loans were underwritten to
program guidelines for business-purpose loans where the lender
generally expects the property (or its value) to be the primary
source of repayment (No Ratio). The lender reviews mortgagor's
credit profile, though it does not rely on the borrower's income to
make its credit decision. However, the lender considers the
property-level cash flows or minimum debt service coverage ratio in
underwriting SBC loans with balances over $750,000 for purchase
transactions and over $500,000 for refinance transactions. Because
the loans were made to investors for business purposes, they are
exempt from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's
Ability-to-Repay rules and TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure rule.

The pool is about one month seasoned on a weighted average (WA)
basis, although seasoning may span from zero up to 93 months.

PHH Mortgage Corporation will service all loans within the pool for
a servicing fee of 0.30% per annum. In addition, Velocity will act
as a Special Servicer servicing the loans that defaulted or became
60 or more days delinquent under Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA)
method and other loans, as defined in the transaction documents
(Specially Serviced Loans). The Special Servicer will be entitled
to receive compensation based on an annual fee of 0.75% and the
balance of Specially Serviced Loans. Also, the Special Servicer is
entitled to a liquidation fee equal to 2.00% of the net proceeds
from the liquidation of a Specially Serviced Loan, as described in
the transaction documents.

The Servicer will fund advances of delinquent principal and
interest (P&I) until the advances are deemed unrecoverable. Also,
the Servicer is obligated to make advances with respect to taxes,
insurance premiums, and reasonable costs incurred in the course of
servicing and disposing properties.

U.S. Bank National Association (rated AA (high) with a Stable trend
by DBRS Morningstar) will act as the Trustee, Paying Agent, and
Custodian.

The Seller, directly or indirectly through a majority-owned
affiliate, is expected to retain an eligible horizontal residual
interest consisting of the Class P, Class XS, and Class M-7
Certificates, collectively representing at least 5% of the fair
value of all Certificates, to satisfy the credit risk-retention
requirements under Section 15G of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Such retention
aligns Sponsor and investor interest in the capital structure.

On or after the later of (1) the three-year anniversary of the
Closing Date or (2) the date when the aggregate stated principal
balance of the mortgage loans is reduced to 30% of the Closing Date
balance, the Depositor may purchase all outstanding Certificates
(Optional Purchase) at a price equal to the sum of the remaining
aggregate balance of the Certificates plus accrued and unpaid
interest, and any fees, expenses, and indemnity payments due and
unpaid to the transaction parties, including any unreimbursed P&I
and servicing advances, and other amounts due as applicable. The
Optional Purchase will be conducted concurrently with a qualified
liquidation of the Issuer.

Additionally, if on any date on which the unpaid mortgage loan
balance and the value of real estate owned (REO) properties has
declined to less than 10% of the initial mortgage loan balance as
of the Cut-off Date, the Directing Holder, the Special Servicer, or
the Servicer, in that order of priority, may purchase all of the
mortgages, REO properties, and any other properties from the Issuer
(Optional Termination) at a price specified in the transaction
documents. The Optional Termination will be conducted as a
qualified liquidation of the Issuer. The Directing Holder
(initially, the Seller) is the representative selected by the
holders of more than 50% of the Class XS certificates (the
Controlling Class).

The transaction uses a structure sometimes referred to as a
modified pro rata structure. Prior to the Class A credit
enhancement (CE) falling below 10.0% of the loan balance as of the
Cut-off Date (Class A Minimum CE Event), the principal
distributions allow for amortization of all senior and subordinate
bonds based on CE targets set at different levels for performing
(same CE as at issuance) and nonperforming (higher CE than at
issuance) loans. Each Class' target principal balance is determined
based on the CE targets and the performing and nonperforming (those
that are 90 or more days MBA delinquent, in foreclosure and REO,
and subject to a servicing modification within the prior 12 months)
loan amounts. As such, the principal payments are paid on a pro
rata basis, up to each Class' target principal balance, as long as
no loans in the pool are nonperforming. If the share of
nonperforming loans grows, the corresponding CE target increases.
Thus, the principal payment amount increases for the senior and
senior subordinate classes and falls for the more subordinate
bonds. The goal is to distribute the appropriate amount of
principal to the senior and subordinate bonds each month, to always
maintain the desired level of CE, based on the performing and
nonperforming pool percentages. After the Class A Minimum CE Event,
the principal distributions are made sequentially.

Relative to the sequential pay structure, the modified pro rata
structure is more sensitive to the timing of the projected defaults
and losses because the losses may be applied at a time when the
amount of credit support is reduced as the bonds' principal
balances amortize over a life of the transaction. That said, the
excess spread can be used to cover realized losses after being
allocated to the unpaid net weighted average coupon shortfalls (Net
WAC Rate Carryover Amounts). Please see the Cash Flow Structure and
Features section of the report for more details.

COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (CMBS) METHODOLOGY

Of the 331 loans, 329 loans, representing 98.9% of the SBC portion
of the pool, have a fixed interest rate with a straight average of
8.63%. The two floating-rate loans have an interest rate ranging
from 6.50% to 8.25% and an interest rate margin of 4.50%. To
determine the POD and loss given default inputs in the CMBS Insight
Model, DBRS Morningstar applied a stress to the index type that
corresponded with the remaining fully extended term of the loan and
added the respective contractual loan spread to determine a
stressed interest rate over the loan term. DBRS Morningstar looked
to the greater of the interest rate floor or the DBRS Morningstar
stressed index rate when calculating stressed debt service. The WA
modeled coupon rate was 8.31%. Most of the loans have original loan
term lengths of 30 years and fully amortize over 30-year schedules.
However, 25 loans, which comprise 14.7% of the SBC pool, have an
initial IO period ranging from 12 months to 120 months and then
fully amortize over shortened 20- to 29-year schedules.

All SBC loans were originated between September 2014 and June 2022,
resulting in a WA seasoning of 1.3 months. The SBC pool has a WA
original term length of 356.7 months, or nearly 30 years. Two SBC
loans have an original term of 10 years, one loan has a 15-year
term, one loan has a 20-year term, and the remaining 327 loans have
30-year terms. Based on the current loan amount, which reflects
approximately 9 basis points (bps) of amortization, and the current
appraised values, the SBC pool has a WA loan-to-value ratio (LTV)
of 64.1%. However, DBRS Morningstar made LTV adjustments to 47
loans that had an implied capitalization rate more than 200 bps
lower than a set of minimal capitalization rates established by the
DBRS Morningstar Market Rank. The DBRS Morningstar minimum
capitalization rates range from 5.0% for properties in Market Rank
8 to 8.0% for properties in Market Rank 1. This resulted in a
higher DBRS Morningstar LTV of 69.8%. Lastly, all loans fully
amortize over their respective remaining terms, resulting in 100%
expected amortization; this amount of amortization is greater than
what is typical for CMBS conduit pools. DBRS Morningstar's research
indicates that, for CMBS conduit transactions securitized between
2000 and 2021, average amortization by year has ranged between 6.5%
to 22.0%, with an overall average of 15.7%.

As contemplated and explained in "DBRS Morningstar's Rating North
American CMBS Interest-Only Certificates" methodology, the most
significant risk to an IO cash flow stream is term default risk. As
DBRS Morningstar noted in the methodology, for a pool of
approximately 63,000 CMBS loans that had fully cycled through to
their maturity defaults, the average total default rate across all
property types was approximately 17%, the refinance default rate
was 6% (approximately one-third of the total default rate), and the
term default rate was approximately 11%. DBRS Morningstar
recognizes the muted impact of refinance risk on IO certificates by
notching the IO rating up by one notch from the Reference
Obligation rating. When using the 10-year Idealized Default Table
default probability to derive a POD for a CMBS bond from its
rating, DBRS Morningstar estimates that, in general, a one-third
reduction in the CMBS Reference Obligation POD maps to a tranche
rating that is approximately one notch higher than the Reference
Obligation or the Applicable Reference Obligation, whichever is
appropriate. Therefore, similar logic regarding term default risk
supported the rationale for DBRS Morningstar to reduce the POD in
the CMBS Insight Model by one notch because refinance risk is
largely absent for this SBC pool of loans.

The DBRS Morningstar CMBS Insight Model does not contemplate the
ability to prepay loans, which is generally seen as credit positive
because a prepaid loan cannot default. The CMBS predictive model
was calibrated using loans that have prepayment lockout features.
Those loans' historical prepayment performance is close to zero
conditional prepayment rate (CPR). If the CMBS predictive model had
an expectation of prepayments, DBRS Morningstar would expect the
default levels to be reduced. Any loan that prepays is removed from
the pool and can no longer default. This collateral pool does not
have any prepayment lockout features, and DBRS Morningstar expects
that this pool will have prepayments over the remainder of the
transaction. DBRS Morningstar applied the following to calculate a
default rate prepayment haircut: Using Intex Dealmaker, a lifetime
constant default rate (CDR) was calculated that approximated the
default rate for each rating category. While applying the same
lifetime CDR, DBRS Morningstar applied a 2.0% CPR. When holding the
CDR constant and applying 2.0% CPR, the cumulative default amount
declined. The percentage change in the cumulative default prior to
and after applying the prepayments, subject to a 10.0% maximum
reduction, was then applied to the cumulative default assumption to
calculate a fully adjusted cumulative default assumption.

The SBC pool is quite diverse based on loan size, with an average
cut-off date loan balance of $485,188, a concentration profile
equivalent to that of a transaction with 161 equal-size loans, and
a top-10 loan concentration of 15.8%. Increased pool diversity
helps to insulate the higher-rated classes from event risk.

The loans are mostly secured by traditional property types (i.e.,
multifamily, retail, office, and industrial), with no exposure to
higher-volatility property types, such as hotels or other lodging
facilities.

Of the 331 loans, 330 loans in the SBC pool fully amortize over
their respective remaining loan terms between 120 months and 360
months, reducing refinance risk.

As classified by DBRS Morningstar for modeling purposes, the SBC
pool contains a significant exposure to retail (22.9% of the SBC
pool) and a smaller exposure to office (16.8% of the SBC pool),
which are two of the higher-volatility asset types. Loans counted
as retail include those identified as automotive and potentially
commercial condominium. Combined, retail and office properties
represent nearly 40% of the SBC pool balance. Retail, which has
struggled because of the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic,
comprises the second-largest asset type in the transaction. DBRS
Morningstar applied a 20.0% reduction to the net cash flow (NCF)
for retail properties and a 41.6% reduction for office assets in
the SBC pool, which is above the average NCF reduction applied for
comparable property types in CMBS analyzed deals.

DBRS Morningstar did not perform site inspections on loans within
its sample for this transaction. Instead, DBRS Morningstar relied
upon analysis of third-party reports and online searches to
determine property quality assessments. Of the 63 loans DBRS
Morningstar sampled, two were Average quality (7.4%), 40 were
Average – (58.3%), 18 were Below Average (28.4%), and three were
Poor (5.9%). DBRS Morningstar assumed unsampled loans were Average
– quality, which has a slightly increased POD level. This is more
conservative than the assessments from sampled loans and is
consistent with other SBC transactions.

Limited property-level information was available for DBRS
Morningstar to review. Asset summary reports, PCRs, Phase I/II
environmental site assessment (ESA) reports, and historical cash
flows were generally not available for review in conjunction with
this securitization. DBRS Morningstar received and reviewed
appraisals for the top 18 loans, which represent 23.1% of the SBC
pool balance. These appraisals were issued between November 2021
and May 2022 when the respective loans were originated. DBRS
Morningstar was able to perform a loan-level cash flow analysis on
the top 18 loans. The haircuts ranged from -1.2% to -100.0%, with
an average of -21.9% when excluding outliers; however, DBRS
Morningstar generally applied more conservative haircuts on the
unsampled loans. No ESA reports were provided and are not required
by the Issuer; however, all of the loans are placed onto an
environmental insurance policy that provides coverage to the Issuer
and the securitization trust in the event of a claim.

DBRS Morningstar received limited borrower information, net worth
or liquidity information, and credit history. DBRS Morningstar
generally initially assumed loans had Weak sponsorship scores,
which increases the stress on the default rate. The initial
assumption of Weak reflects the generally less sophisticated nature
of small-balance borrowers and assessments from past small-balance
transactions. Furthermore, DBRS Morningstar received a 12-month pay
history on each loan as of February 28, 2022. If any loan had more
than two late pays within this period or was currently 30 days past
due, DBRS Morningstar applied an additional stress to the default
rate. This occurred for three loans, representing 1.2% of the SBC
pool balance. Finally, DBRS Morningstar received a borrower FICO
score for all loans, with an average FICO score of 721. While the
CMBS Methodology does not contemplate FICO scores, the residential
mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) Methodology does and would
characterize a FICO score of 721 as near prime, whereas prime is
considered greater than 750. Borrowers with a FICO score of 721
could generally be described as potentially having had previous
credit events (foreclosure, bankruptcy, etc.), but, if they did, it
is likely that these credit events were cleared about two to five
years ago.

RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (RMBS) METHODOLOGY

The collateral pool consists of 451 mortgage loans with a total
balance of approximately $172.9 million collateralized by one- to
four-unit investment properties. Velocity underwrote the mortgage
loans to No Ratio program guidelines for business-purpose loans.

The coronavirus pandemic and the resulting isolation measures
caused an immediate economic contraction, leading to sharp
increases in unemployment rates and income reductions for many
consumers. DBRS Morningstar saw increases in delinquencies for many
RMBS asset classes shortly after the onset of the pandemic.

Such mortgage delinquencies were mostly in the form of
forbearances, which are generally short-term payment reliefs that
may perform very differently from traditional delinquencies. At the
onset of the pandemic, the option to forbear mortgage payments was
so widely available that it drove forbearances to a very high
level. When the dust settled, coronavirus-induced forbearances in
2020 performed better than expected, thanks to government aid, low
LTVs, and good underwriting in the mortgage market in general.
Across nearly all RMBS asset classes, delinquencies have been
gradually trending down in recent months as the forbearance period
comes to an end for many borrowers.

As of the Cut-Off Date, no borrower within the pool is currently
subject to a coronavirus-related forbearance plan with the
Servicer.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



WACHOVIA BANK 2007-C33: S&P Discontinues 'D' Rating on A-J Certs
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings discontinued its 'D (sf)' ratings on two classes
of commercial mortgage pass-through certificates from two U.S. CMBS
transactions.

S&P said, "We discontinued these ratings according to our
surveillance and withdrawal policies. We previously lowered the
ratings on these classes to 'D (sf)' because of principal losses
and/or accumulated interest shortfalls that we believed would
remain outstanding for an extended period of time. We view a
subsequent upgrade to a rating higher than 'D (sf)' to be unlikely
under the relevant criteria for the classes within this review.

  Ratings Discontinued

  Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2007-C33

   Class A-J to NR from 'D (sf)'

  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2010-C2

  Class F to NR from 'D (sf)'





WELLS FARGO 2015-LC22: DBRS Confirms B Rating on Class F Certs
--------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited confirmed its ratings on the Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-LC22 issued by Wells Fargo
Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-LC22 as follows:

-- Class A-3 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-4 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-SB at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class X-A at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (low) (sf)
-- Class PEX at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class X-E at BB (sf)
-- Class E at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class X-F at B (high) (sf)
-- Class F at B (sf)

DBRS Morningstar changed the trends on Classes E, F, XE, and XF to
Stable from Negative. All remaining classes have Stable trends. The
rating confirmations and trend changes reflect the improved overall
outlook for the loans in special servicing and the improved
performance of the loans on the servicer's watchlist since the
transaction's last review.

As of the July 2022 remittance, 95 of the original 100 loans remain
in the trust, with an aggregate balance of approximately $801.6
million, representing a collateral reduction of 16.8% since
issuance. Additionally, 13 loans, representing 14.6% of the current
pool balance are fully defeased. Homewood Suites Houston
Intercontinental (Prospectus ID #39) was liquidated in March 2022
at a realized loss of $2.6 million, below the loss estimate at last
review. Also as of the July 2022 remittance, four loans,
representing 4.3% of the current pool balance, are in special
servicing, and 19 loans, representing 25.4% of the pool, are on the
servicer's watchlist for a variety of performance-related
concerns.

The largest specially serviced loan, Clearwater Collection
(Prospectus ID #17, 1.6% of the pool), is secured by a
134,361-square foot (sf) retail property in Clearwater, Florida.
The loan was transferred to the special servicer in July 2018
because of payment default when the sponsor, Gary J. Dragul of GDA
Real Estate Services, was indicted for fraudulent activities. The
special servicer pursued a foreclosure strategy with the appointed
receiver working toward selling the properties. Recently, in April
2022, the Borrower filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in Colorado, and the
litigation remains ongoing. The special servicer is anticipating a
Receiver's sale that will reportedly result in a full payoff of the
loan, per the most recent servicer commentary.

According to the March 2022 rent roll, the property is 54.4%
occupied by two tenants, Floor & Decor Outlets of America, Inc.
(Floor & Decor; 49% of the net rentable area (NRA), lease expiry
recently extended to May 2027) and Blazin Wings (formerly 5.4% of
the NRA, lease expiry July 2022). Blazin Wings seems to have left
the property following its lease expiration, leaving Floor & Decor
as the sole tenant. The YE2021 debt service coverage ratio (DSCR)
was reported at 0.44 times (x), compared with the YE2020 DSCR of
0.24x and the YE2019 DSCR of 2.32x. According to the July 2021
appraisal, the property was valued at $10.8 million, which is
slightly above the October 2020 appraisal value of $10.4 million
but a 41.6% decrease from the issuance value of $18.5 million. As
of this review, DBRS Morningstar liquidated this loan from the
pool, which resulted in a loss severity in excess of 25%.

The largest loan on the servicer's watchlist, 40 Wall Street
(Prospectus ID#1; 9.6% of pool), also the largest loan in the pool,
is secured by the leasehold interest in a 71-story, 1.2-million sf
office building at 40 Wall Street, one block from the New York
Stock Exchange. The loan is on the watchlist because of a low DSCR,
with the YE2021 DSCR reported at 1.13x, YE2020 DSCR of 1.25x, and
DBRS Morningstar DSCR of 1.53x at issuance. The decline in net cash
flow was mainly driven by a decrease in base rental revenue because
the borrower had offered rent concessions to some of its tenants
amid the pandemic with the goal of retaining tenants long term,
while other tenants had delayed move-in dates. According to the
servicer, the borrower will not be forgiving any rents and is
expecting revenues to rebound.

According to the most recent financial reporting, the property had
trailing three month (T-3) ended March 31, 2022, an occupancy rate
of 83.5%, slightly below the YE2021 and YE2020 occupancy rates of
86.0% and 87.2%, respectively, as well as issuance occupancy of
97.8%. The former third-largest tenant at the subject, Thorton
Tomasetti (5.2% of the NRA) recently vacated the premises to
relocate to its new headquarters and paid a lease cancellation fee.
Other large tenants remaining at the property include Green Ivy
(7.4% of NRA, lease expires in November 2061) and Country Wide
Insurance (7.3% of NRA, lease expires in August 2036). The property
benefits from an ideal location as well as a granular rent roll
with minimal rollover in the next 12 months. The Downtown submarket
reported a Q1 2022 vacancy rate of 12.4%, compared with Q1 2021 and
Q1 2020 vacancy rates of 11.8% and 11.7%, respectively. The
sponsor, Donald J. Trump of the Trump Organization, has made
headlines for inconsistent reporting of his corporate financial
statements and generally withholding information regarding his real
estate portfolio. Considering the decline in performance because of
dropping occupancy and general challenges that the sponsor is
currently encountering, DBRS Morningstar analyzed this loan with an
elevated probability of default to increase the expected loss with
this review.

The second-largest loan on the servicer's watchlist loan is West
Palm Beach Marriott (Prospectus ID#6; 3.4% of the pool), which is
secured by a 352-key, full-service hotel in West Palm Beach,
Florida. This loan is on the watchlist because of a low DSCR, with
T-12 ended December 31, 2021, DSCR reported at 0.24x, an
improvement from the YE2020 DSCR of -0.45x but below the YE2019
DSCR of 1.96x and the DBRS Morningstar DSCR of 1.66x. It is
noteworthy that despite the poor performance, the loan is current
and the borrower did not request any relief during the pandemic.

According to article published by Real Deal in December 2019, the
Marriott family sold the subject to Jackson Hole Trust Company,
which manages real estate, businesses, and other investments on
behalf of families in the U.S. and internationally. More recently,
in May 2022, an article from Palm Beach Post noted that the
property owners want to build a 327,000-sf office and conference
complex. Considering the decline in performance of the hotel and
the general uncertainty surrounding the repurposing of the subject
by the new owners, DBRS Morningstar will continue to monitor the
loan for any developments.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



WELLS FARGO 2016-C36: DBRS Confirms CCC Rating on Class EFG Certs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited downgraded its ratings on nine classes of the
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C36
issued by Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C36 as
follows:

-- Class E-2 to B (high) (sf) from BB (sf)
-- Class E to B (high) (sf) from BB (sf)
-- Class F-1 to B (sf) from B (high) (sf)
-- Class F-2 to B (low) (sf) from B (sf)
-- Class F to B (low) (sf) from B (sf)
-- Class EF to B (low) (sf) from B (sf)
-- Class G-1 to CCC (sf) from B (low) (sf)
-- Class G-2 to C (sf) from CCC (sf)
-- Class G to C (sf) from CCC (sf)

DBRS Morningstar also confirmed its ratings on the remaining
classes as follows:

-- Class A-3 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-4 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-SB at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class X-A at AAA (sf)
-- Class X-B at AA (high) (sf)
-- Class B at AA (sf)
-- Class C at A (sf)
-- Class X-D at BBB (high) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (sf)
-- Class E-1 at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class EFG at CCC (sf)

DBRS Morningstar also changed the trends on Classes D and X-D to
Stable from Negative. The trends on classes E-1, E-2, E, F-1, F-2,
EF, and F remain Negative. All other trends are Stable with the
exceptions of Classes G-1, G-2, G, and EFG, which are assigned
ratings that generally do not carry a trend for Commercial
Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) ratings. The rating downgrades
and Negative trends reflect the continued performance challenges
for the loans showing increased risks from issuance including one
specially serviced loan and the largest watchlisted loan, as
further described below. In particular, DBRS Morningstar
anticipates sizable losses for the Mall at Turtle Creek, which
would erode the unrated classes and could spill over into Class G,
prompting the aforementioned downgrades.

The trust consists of 66 of the original 73 loans with an aggregate
principal balance of $741.9 million, reflecting a collateral
reduction of 13.5% since issuance. As of July 2022, there are 15
loans, representing 30.8% of the pool, on the servicer's watchlist.
There are four loans, representing 10.7% of the pool, in special
servicing and two loans, representing 4.1% of the pool, are
delinquent. Nine loans, representing 4.3% of the current pool, have
fully defeased. The pool is concentrated by property type, with
33.7% of the pool secured by retail properties, 24.1% of the pool
secured by retail properties, and 12.8% of the pool secured by
multifamily properties.

The largest loan, Gurnee Mills (Prospectus ID#1, 10.1% of the
current pool), is secured by a regional mall in Gurnee, Illinois.
The loan is sponsored by Simon Property Group (Simon) and was
previously in special servicing before it was brought current, cash
management was initiated and returned to the master servicer in
June 2021. The servicer approved a loan modification that allowed
for a period of deferred debt service payments and interest-only
(IO) debt service payments, with deferred amounts to be paid in 24
installments beginning in March 2021. The loan has consistently
reported cash flows below the Issuer's figure of $25.1 million,
with occupancy decreases driving the bulk of the declines. These
trends preceded the onset of the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)
pandemic, which exacerbated those previous trends and contributed
to the default on the loan in 2020.

The property was 81.9% occupied as of March 2022, slightly
increasing from 77.5% at yearend (YE) 2021 but still below the
issuance occupancy rate of 91%. The loan reported a debt service
coverage ratio of 1.74 times (x) as of March 2022, remaining in
line with YE2021. However, this appears to be based on the in-place
debt service obligation with the modified loan terms; based on the
original debt service amount, the implied coverage is much lower,
at 1.13x. There is limited rollover risk within the next 12 months,
with 9.3% of net rentable area (NRA) scheduled to expire. As of
July 2022, all anchor units were fully or partially occupied, with
Hobby Lobby (4.0% of the net rentable area (NRA)), partially
back-filling the former Sears space (previously 11.9% of the NRA),
space. No recent sales were provided in response to DBRS
Morningstar's request of the servicer. Although the in-place
coverage is healthy, the occupancy declines from issuance and the
sharp decline in cash flow from issuance to $17.8 million at YE2021
suggests there has likely been a significant value decline in that
time. Simon appears committed to the loan and property, however,
and there have been some recent positive developments in the
leasing activity and cash flow improvements from YE2020. Given the
increased risks for this loan, DBRS Morningstar assumed a stressed
scenario to increase the expected loss in the analysis.

The largest specially serviced loan, Mall at Turtle Creek
(Prospectus ID#7, 3.5% of the current pool) is secured by a portion
of a regional mall in Jonesboro, Arkansas. The loan transferred to
special servicing in August 2020 for imminent default and remains
delinquent. The property was largely destroyed by a tornado in
March 2020, with only noncollateral tenants, Dillards, JCPenney,
and Target, reopening later that year. The majority of the mall was
later demolished. As of July 2022, servicer commentary reports the
majority of the mall has been demolished and the borrower is
unwilling to rebuild the property and carry the loan. As of July
2022, the servicer commentary shows that the servicer expects to
take title of the property within the next few months. The mall was
showing significant performance declines prior to the tornado
event, with YE2019 net cash flow at $5.3 million, down from the
Issuer's figure of $7.1 million. Given these factors, the insurance
settlement could be reduced to reflect the likely value decline
from issuance. Given these factors, DBRS Morningstar believes a
high loss severity is likely at disposition and assumed a loss
severity exceeding 75.0% in the analysis for this review.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



[*] DBRS Confirms 11 Ratings From 6 Affirm Asset Trust Deals
------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. upgraded three ratings and confirmed 11 ratings from six
Affirm Asset Securitization Trust transactions.

Debt Rated       Rating         Action
----------       ------              ------
Affirm Asset Securitization Trust 2020-Z1

Class A Notes     AAA (sf)          Upgraded

Affirm Asset Securitization Trust 2020-Z2

Class A Notes     AAA (sf)          Upgraded

Affirm Asset Securitization Trust 2021-A

Class A Notes     AA (sf)           Confirmed
Class B Notes     A (sf)            Confirmed
Class C Notes     BBB (sf)          Confirmed
Class D Notes     BB (sf)           Confirmed
Class E Notes     B (sf)            Confirmed

Affirm Asset Securitization Trust 2021-B

Class A Notes    AA (sf)            Confirmed
Class B Notes    A (sf)             Confirmed
Class C Notes    BBB (sf)           Confirmed
Class D Notes    BB (sf)            Confirmed
Class E Notes    B (sf)             ConfirmeD

Affirm Asset Securitization Trust 2021-Z1

Class A Notes AAA (sf)           Upgrade

Affirm Asset Securitization Trust 2021-Z2

Class A Notes    AA (sf)            Confirmed

The rating actions are based on the following analytical
considerations:

-- The transaction assumptions consider DBRS Morningstar's
baseline macroeconomic scenarios for rated sovereign economies,
available in its commentary Baseline Macroeconomic Scenarios For
Rated Sovereigns: June 2022 Update, published on June 29, 2022.
These baseline macroeconomic scenarios replace DBRS Morningstar's
moderate and adverse COVID-19 pandemic scenarios, which were first
published in April 2020.

-- The transaction parties' capabilities with regard to
origination, underwriting, and servicing.

-- The rating actions are the result of the strong collateral
performance to date, DBRS Morningstar's assessment of future
performance assumptions, and the increasing levels of credit
enhancement.

-- The transaction's capital structure and form and sufficiency of
available credit enhancement. The current level of hard credit
enhancement and estimated excess spread are sufficient to support
the DBRS Morningstar-projected remaining cumulative net loss
assumption at a multiple of coverage commensurate with the ratings.


[*] DBRS Reviews 57 Classes from 8 US RMBS Transactions
-------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. reviewed 57 classes from eight U.S. single-family rental
transactions. Of the 57 classes reviewed, DBRS Morningstar upgraded
five ratings and confirmed 52 ratings.

AMSR 2019-SFR1 Trust

-- AMSR 2019-SFR1 Trust, Class A confirmed at AAA (sf)
-- AMSR 2019-SFR1 Trust, Class B confirmed at AAA (sf)
-- AMSR 2019-SFR1 Trust, Class C upgraded to AAA (sf) from AA
(high) (sf)
-- AMSR 2019-SFR1 Trust, Class D confirmed at AA (sf)
-- AMSR 2019-SFR1 Trust, Class E confirmed at BBB (low) (sf)
-- AMSR 2019-SFR1 Trust, Class F confirmed at BB (sf)
-- AMSR 2019-SFR1 Trust, Class G confirmed at B (high) (sf)

AMSR 2020-SFR1 Trust

-- AMSR 2020-SFR1 Trust, Class A confirmed at AAA (sf)
-- AMSR 2020-SFR1 Trust, Class B confirmed at AAA (sf)
-- AMSR 2020-SFR1 Trust, Class C upgraded to AAA (sf) from AA
(high) (sf)
-- AMSR 2020-SFR1 Trust, Class D confirmed at AA (high) (sf)
-- AMSR 2020-SFR1 Trust, Class E confirmed at BBB (low) (sf)
-- AMSR 2020-SFR1 Trust, Class F confirmed at BB (sf)
-- AMSR 2020-SFR1 Trust, Class G confirmed at B (sf)

AMSR 2020-SFR2 Trust

-- AMSR 2020-SFR2 Trust, Class A confirmed at AAA (sf)
-- AMSR 2020-SFR2 Trust, Class B confirmed at AAA (sf)
-- AMSR 2020-SFR2 Trust, Class C confirmed at AA (high) (sf)
-- AMSR 2020-SFR2 Trust, Class D upgraded to AA (sf) from AA (low
(sf)
-- AMSR 2020-SFR2 Trust, Class E1 upgraded to A (sf) from A (low)
(sf)
-- AMSR 2020-SFR2 Trust, Class E2 confirmed at BBB (low) (sf)
-- AMSR 2020-SFR2 Trust, Class F confirmed at BB (high) (sf)
-- AMSR 2020-SFR2 Trust, Class G confirmed at BB (low) (sf)
-- AMSR 2020-SFR2 Trust, Class H confirmed at B (low) (sf)

AMSR 2020-SFR3 Trust

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class A
confirmed at AAA (sf)

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class B
confirmed at AAA (sf)

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class C
confirmed at AA (high) (sf)

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class D
upgraded to AA (low) (sf) from A (high) (sf)

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class E-1
confirmed at BBB (high) (sf)

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class E-2
confirmed at BBB (low) (sf)

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class F-1
confirmed at BB (low) (sf)

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class F-2
confirmed at B (low) (sf)

Home Partners of America 2019-1 Trust

-- HPA 2019-1, Class A confirmed at AAA (sf)
-- HPA 2019-1, Class B confirmed at AA (high) (sf)
-- HPA 2019-1, Class C confirmed at AA (low) (sf)
-- HPA 2019-1, Class D confirmed at A (low) (sf)
-- HPA 2019-1, Class E confirmed at BBB (sf)
-- HPA 2019-1, Class F confirmed at BBB (low) (sf)

Home Partners of America 2019-2 Trust

-- HPA 2019-2, Class A confirmed at AAA (sf)
-- HPA 2019-2, Class B confirmed at AAA (sf)
-- HPA 2019-2, Class C confirmed at AA (sf)
-- HPA 2019-2, Class D confirmed at A (low) (sf)
-- HPA 2019-2, Class E confirmed at BBB (low) (sf)
-- HPA 2019-2, Class F confirmed at BB (sf)

Progress Residential 2019-SFR3 Trust

-- PRD 2019-SFR3, Class A confirmed at AAA (sf)
-- PRD 2019-SFR3, Class B confirmed at AAA (sf)
-- PRD 2019-SFR3, Class C confirmed at AA (high) (sf)
-- PRD 2019-SFR3, Class D confirmed at A (high) (sf)
-- PRD 2019-SFR3, Class E confirmed at BBB (low) (sf)
-- PRD 2019-SFR3, Class F confirmed at BB (sf)

Progress Residential 2021-SFR7 Trust

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class A
confirmed at AAA (sf)

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class B
confirmed at AA (high) (sf)

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class C
confirmed at A (high) (sf)

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class D
confirmed at A (low) (sf)

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class E-1
confirmed at BBB (sf)

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class E-2
confirmed at BBB (low) (sf)

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class F
confirmed at BB (low) (sf)

-- Single-Family Rental Pass-Through Certificates, Class G
confirmed at B (sf)

The rating confirmations reflect asset performance and
credit-support levels that are consistent with the current
ratings.

DBRS Morningstar's rating actions are based on the following
analytical consideration:

-- Key performance measures as reflected in month-over-month
changes in vacancy and delinquency, quarterly analysis of the
actual expenses, credit enhancement increases since deal inception,
and bond paydown factors.

Notes: The principal methodology is U.S. Single-Family Rental
Securitization Ratings Methodology (May 28, 2020), which can be
found on dbrsmorningstar.com under Methodologies & Criteria.


[*] DBRS Reviews 72 Classes from 8 U.S. RMBS Transactions
---------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. reviewed 72 classes from eight U.S. residential
mortgage-backed security (RMBS) transactions. Of the 72 classes
reviewed, DBRS Morningstar confirmed all 72 ratings.

The Affected Ratings Are Available at https://bit.ly/3zAxnQG

The rating confirmations reflect asset performance and credit
support levels that are consistent with the current ratings.

The pools backing the reviewed RMBS transactions consist of
non-Qualified Mortgage and reperforming mortgage collateral and
fixed- and adjustable-rate, first-lien residential mortgages
collateralized by investor properties with one to four units
(residential investor loans) and small-balance commercial mortgages
collateralized by various types of commercial, multifamily rental,
and mixed-use properties.

The ratings assigned to the securities listed below differ from the
ratings implied by the quantitative model. DBRS Morningstar
considers these differences material deviations; however, in these
cases, the ratings on the subject securities may reflect additional
seasoning being warranted to substantiate a further upgrade.

-- Bravo Residential Funding Trust 2021-NQM2, Mortgage-Backed
Notes, Series 2021-NQM2, Class A-3

-- Bravo Residential Funding Trust 2021-NQM2, Mortgage-Backed
Notes, Series 2021-NQM2, Class M-1

-- Bravo Residential Funding Trust 2021-NQM2, Mortgage-Backed
Notes, Series 2021-NQM2, Class B-1

-- Bravo Residential Funding Trust 2021-NQM2, Mortgage-Backed
Notes, Series 2021-NQM2, Class B-2

-- Imperial Fund Mortgage Trust 2021-NQM2, Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2021-NQM2, Class B-2

-- MFA 2021-NQM2 Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2021-NQM2, Class A-3

-- MFA 2021-NQM2 Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2021-NQM2, Class M-1

-- MFA 2021-NQM2 Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2021-NQM2, Class B-1

-- MFA 2021-NQM2 Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2021-NQM2, Class B-2

-- Verus Securitization Trust 2021-5, Mortgage-Backed Notes,
Series 2021-5, Class A-3

-- Verus Securitization Trust 2021-5, Mortgage-Backed Notes,
Series 2021-5, Class M-1

-- Verus Securitization Trust 2021-5, Mortgage-Backed Notes,
Series 2021-5, Class B-1

-- Verus Securitization Trust 2021-5, Mortgage-Backed Notes,
Series 2021-5, Class B-2

-- GS Mortgage-Backed Securities Trust 2021-RPL2, Mortgage-Backed
Securities Trust 2021-RPL2, Class M-1

-- GS Mortgage-Backed Securities Trust 2021-RPL2, Mortgage-Backed
Securities Trust 2021-RPL2, Class M-2

-- GS Mortgage-Backed Securities Trust 2021-RPL2, Mortgage-Backed
Securities Trust 2021-RPL2, Class B-1

-- GS Mortgage-Backed Securities Trust 2021-RPL2, Mortgage-Backed
Securities Trust 2021-RPL2, Class B-2

-- GS Mortgage-Backed Securities Trust 2021-RPL2, Mortgage-Backed
Securities Trust 2021-RPL2, Class A-4

-- GS Mortgage-Backed Securities Trust 2021-RPL2, Mortgage-Backed
Securities Trust 2021-RPL2, Class A-5

-- PRPM 2021-RPL1, LLC, Asset Backed Notes, Series 2021-RPL1,
Class A-2

-- PRPM 2021-RPL1, LLC, Asset Backed Notes, Series 2021-RPL1,
Class M-1

-- Velocity Commercial Capital Loan Trust 2021-2, Mortgage-Backed
Certificates, Series 2021-2, Class M-4

-- Velocity Commercial Capital Loan Trust 2021-2, Mortgage-Backed
Certificates, Series 2021-2, Class M-5

-- Velocity Commercial Capital Loan Trust 2021-2, Mortgage-Backed
Certificates, Series 2021-2, Class M4-A

-- Velocity Commercial Capital Loan Trust 2021-2, Mortgage-Backed
Certificates, Series 2021-2, Class M4-IO

-- Velocity Commercial Capital Loan Trust 2021-2, Mortgage-Backed
Certificates, Series 2021-2, Class M5-A

-- Velocity Commercial Capital Loan Trust 2021-2, Mortgage-Backed
Certificates, Series 2021-2, Class M5-IO

-- Velocity Commercial Capital Loan Trust 2021-3, Mortgage-Backed
Certificates, Series 2021-3, Class M-5

-- Velocity Commercial Capital Loan Trust 2021-3, Mortgage-Backed
Certificates, Series 2021-3, Class M5-A

-- Velocity Commercial Capital Loan Trust 2021-3, Mortgage-Backed
Certificates, Series 2021-3, Class M5-IO

CORONAVIRUS DISEASE (COVID-19) IMPACT

The coronavirus pandemic and the resulting isolation measures
caused an immediate economic contraction, leading to sharp
increases in unemployment rates and income reductions for many
consumers. DBRS Morningstar saw increases in delinquencies for many
RMBS asset classes shortly after the onset of coronavirus.

Such mortgage delinquencies were mostly in the form of
forbearances, which are generally short-term payment reliefs that
may perform very differently from traditional delinquencies.
Because the option to forbear mortgage payments was so widely
available at the onset of the pandemic, it drove forbearances to a
very high level. When the dust settled, coronavirus-induced
forbearances in 2020 performed better than expected, thanks to
government aid and good underwriting in the mortgage market in
general. Across nearly all RMBS asset classes, delinquencies have
been gradually trending down in recent months as the forbearance
period comes to an end for many borrowers.

Notes: The principal methodologies are the U.S. RMBS Surveillance
Methodology (February 21, 2020) and North American CMBS
Surveillance Methodology (March 4, 2022), which can be found on
dbrsmorningstar.com under Methodologies & Criteria.



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa., USA.
Randy Antoni, Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante,
Rousel Elaine Tumanda, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Psyche A. Castillon,
Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and
Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2022.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***