---

         T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, October 10, 2022, Vol. 26, No. 282

                            Headlines

1300U SPE LLC: Unsecured Creditors to be Paid in Full in Plan
2370 FOREST: Exclusivity Period Extended to Dec. 1
270 BERGER: Unsecureds to Get Nothing in Liquidating Plan
4E BRANDS: Exclusivity Period Extended to Dec. 19
5280 AURARIA: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Dec 31

772 & 720 HOLDING: Files for Chapter 11 to Fend Off Receiver
A&D TESTS: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
A.G. DILLARD: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Oct 12
AC NW RETAIL: Reaches Deal With BBB, Files Plan
ACTIVA RESOURCES: Seeks to Extend Solicitation Period to Nov. 17

ADAPTHEALTH LLC: Moody's Affirms Ba3 CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable
ALCARAZ CATERING: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Oct 11
ALLTECH INC: Moody's Affirms 'B2' CFR & Alters Outlook to Negative
ALTERA INFRASTRUCTURE: Committee Taps Pachulski as Co-Counsel
ARETE REHABILITATION: Files Subchapter V Case

B&G PROPERTY: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
BAUSCH HEALTH: Moody's Cuts Rating on Sec. First Lien Debt to Caa1
BERWICK CLINIC: Recovery for Unsecureds Still to Be Determined
BONA VISTA 1606: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
BUCKHARDT TECHNOLOGIES: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 3

BUSINESS CREDIT: Amends Hackenberg & Stark County Secured Claims
BUYK CORP: Auctioneers Can't Claim Premiums, Says US Trustee
BVM THE BRIDGES: Wins Interim Cash Collateral Access
CEREMONY SALON: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Oct 13
CITY LIVING: Seeks to Hire Evans & Mullinix as Legal Counsel

CONNECT TRUCKING: Fine-Tunes Plan Documents
DAYCO LLC: S&P Withdraws 'CCC' Issuer Credit Rating
DEL MONTE: S&P Affirms 'B' Rating on $600MM Sr. Secured Term Loan
DIAMOND SCAFFOLD: May Use Cash Collateral Thru Jan 2023
DUNBAR PLAZA: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee

EAGLE BEAR: Wants More Time for Chapter 11 Plan
ELITE HOME: Committee Wants Exclusivity Period Terminated
EMERALD HOLLOW: Court OKs Interim Cash Collateral Access
EMPOWER PAYMENTS: Moody's Assigns 'B3' CFR, Outlook Stable
ENERFLEX LTD: Moody's Assigns First Time 'B1' Corp. Family Rating

EQM MIDSTREAM: Moody's Affirms Ba3 CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable
FAIRPORT BAPTIST: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Dec 16
FIRST FRUITS: Case Summary & Eight Unsecured Creditors
FOX SUBACUTE: Amends Unsecured Claims Pay Details
FREE SPEECH: Bankruptcy Exposes Alex Jones Web of Friends, Family

FRONT SIGHT: Files Amended Plan; Confirmation Hearing Nov. 18
GIRARDI & KEESE: Erika Asks Judge to Return Diamond Earrings
GTT COMMUNICATIONS: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to Dec. 31
H&S ALANG: Unsecureds Will Get 10% of Claims in 36 Months
HIGHPOINT LIFEHOPE: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee

INMAR INC: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'B-' ICR
INSTASET PLASTICS: Seeks Cash Collateral Access, $800,000 DIP Loan
ISABEL ENTERPRISES: Affiliate Wants More Time for Chapter 11 Plan
JAJE ONE: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
JASPER PELLETS: Wants More Time for Chapter 11 Plan

JEFFERSON LA BREA: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Dec 31
JNF INVESTMENTS: Capital Infusion to Fund Plan Payments
JNF INVESTMENTS: Capital Infusion to Fund Plan Payments
KABBAGE INC: GUC Trust or Causes of Action Proceeds to Fund Plan
KABBAGE INC: Oct. 11 Deadline Set for Panel Questionnaires

KENNEDY-WILSON HOLDINGS: S&P Places 'BB+' ICR on Watch Negative
KISSIMMEE CONDOS: Bid to Use Cash Collateral, DIP Loan Denied
LASHLINER INC: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Oct 31
LEGACY POOLS: Unsecureds to Get Share of Income for 3 Years
LM ENDEAVOR: Future Earnings to Fund Plan Payments

MAGELLAN INT'L: Moody's Rates 2022 Education Bonds 'Ba2'
MARINER HEALTH: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
MARVIN KELLER: Exclusivity Period Extended to Nov. 18
MATHESON FLIGHT: Exclusivity Period Extended to Nov. 30
MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'B+', Outlook Stable

MEGA PHILADELPHIA: Wins Cash Collateral Access on Final Basis
METRO SERVICE: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
MIDWEST OVERNITE: Case Summary & 18 Unsecured Creditors
MILLENNIUM SERVICES: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 2
MMC JUICE: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Oct 31

MORA HOUSE: Case Summary & Two Unsecured Creditors
MV TRUCKING: Cash Collateral Access, DIP Loan Win Court OK
NATIONAL REALTY: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to Feb. 2
NB HOTELS: Seeks to Extend Solicitation Period to Nov. 15
NEXTSPORT INC: Wants More Time for Chapter 11 Plan

NOAH CORPORATION: Wheeler, et al., Dismissal Bid Partly Approved
NORRENBERNS FOODS: Creditors to Get Proceeds From Liquidation
NORWICH ROMAN: Exclusivity Period Extended to Nov. 18
OAKVIEW FARMS: To Seek Plan Confirmation on Oct. 18
OREGON RESEARCH: Seeks Approval to Hire Moss Adams as CPA

PETTERS COMPANY: Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony Partly Granted
PG&E CORP: Trustee Reaches $117Mil. Deal With Cal. Wildfire Victims
PHOENIX HOLDINGS: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to Dec. 19
PIPELINE HEALTH SYSTEM: Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
PIPELINE HEALTH: Deerfield DIP Loan Has Interim OK

PIPELINE HEALTH: New Equity or Borrowing to Fund Plan
POMMEL MEADOWS: Wants Exclusivity Period Extended to Pursue Sale
PRIME SECURITY: Moody's Affirms B1 CFR & Alters Outlook to Positive
PROVIDENT GROUP: Moody's Lowers Rating on Sr. Secured Bond to Caa1
RACKSPACE TECHNOLOGY: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B-', Outlook Stable

REVELATIONS IN CHRIST: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
REVLON INC: Akin Gump, Boies Update on 2016 Term Lenders
RICHMOND HOSPITALITY: Wants More Time for Chapter 11 Plan
RL ENTERPRISES: Seeks to Hire Johnson & Gubler as Legal Counsel
RUSSIAN MEDIA: TD Bank in Talks on Treatment of Claim

RYAN ENVIRONMENTAL: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
SAVVA'S RESTAURANT: Exclusivity Period Extended to Oct. 30
SHOPS AT BROAD: Court OKs Cash Collateral Use Thru Oct 31
SMART AND SASSY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
SPIRIT AIRLINES: Moody's Affirms B1 CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable

SPRING MOUNTAIN: Napa Vineyard Files for Chapter 11 Protection
STAPLES INC: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms 'B' ICR
STONE CLINICAL: Disclosure Inadequate, Ridgeway Says
STOWERS TRUCKING: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
SUNGARD AS NEW: To Seek Plan Confirmation on Oct. 17

SUNGARD AS: Forshey, Bialson Represent Cisco Systems, 2 Others
T.G. UNITED: Exclusivity Period Extended to Nov. 7
TELEGRAPH SQUARE II: Exclusivity Period Extended to Jan. 12
TREEHOUSE FOODS: S&P Affirms 'B' ICR, Off CreditWatch Developing
ULTRA SEAL: Seeks Cash Collateral Access

VIRGINIA TRUE: Creditors' Plan Slated for Vote
WATER WIND: Files Amendment to Disclosure Statement
WESTBANK HOLDINGS: Nov. 7 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
WILLIAMS LAND: Court OKs Cash Collateral Access Thru Oct 26
YU HUA LONG: Unsecureds Slated for 35% to 90% Recovery in Plan

[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from October 3 to 7, 2022

                            *********

1300U SPE LLC: Unsecured Creditors to be Paid in Full in Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
1300U SPE, LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California a Disclosure Statement describing
Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization dated October 4, 2022.

The Debtor is a Delaware limited liability company created on
December 1, 2019 as a real estate investment company. The Debtor's
sole equity member is CIP 1300 U Street Owner LLC.

The Debtor owns a 47,300 square foot office building located at
1300 U Street, 1330 U Street and 1329 V Street, Sacramento, CA
95814; APNs 009-0144-001-0000, 009-0144-002-0000, 009-0144-003
0000. The Debtor values the property at $10,250,000 based upon an
appraisal report dated July 22, 2022.

The Debtor acquired the property for $9,850,000 on January 26,
2021. The Debtor financed the purchase of the property with a
$6,122,000 loan from Fox Capital Mortgage Fund, LP ("FCMF"). The
FCMF loan matured on April 26, 2022. A trustee sale was set for
July 21, 2022 but was ultimately postponed after the Debtor paid
the lender $150,000. The Debtor showed the lender that the funds
would be imminently deposited into its bank account via evidence of
federal reference numbers, but the lender chose to proceed with the
sale.

This case was filed on August 4, 2022 in order to stop a
foreclosure sale of the Debtor's property and so that it can
reorganize its financial affairs via refinance of the FCMF loan.

Class 1 consists of the Secured Claim of Red Fox Capital Mortgage
Fund. Claimant holds the senior lien on the Debtor's real property
located at 1300 U Street, 1330 U Street and 1329 V Street,
Sacramento, CA 95814 (APNs 009-0144-001-0000, 009-0144-002-0000,
009-0144-003 0000), in the amount of approximately $6,293,874 (per
Schedules). This claim will be paid in full from the refinance of
the Debtor's property, directly through escrow.

Class 2 consists of the Secured Claim of Vista Capital. Claimant
asserts that it holds a lien in the amount of approximately
$169,395 (per POC No. 1) secured by all assets of the Debtor. This
alleged claim will not be paid. Debtor will object to this claim as
this claimant obtained a UCC against the Debtor's property related
to a debt that is not owed by this Debtor or its assets.  

Class 3 consists of the Secured Claim of Sacramento County
Treasurer and Tax Collector. Claimant holds a tax lien in the
amount of approximately $75,345 (per Schedules). This claim will be
paid in full from the refinance of the Debtor's property, directly
through escrow. The claim will accrue interest at 18% per annum
(the interest rate to be paid to the County is determined by 11
U.S.C §511) until paid in full.

Class 5 consists of General Unsecured Claims. In the present case,
the Debtor estimates that Class 5 general unsecured claims total
approximately $1,057,311. These claims will be paid in full without
interest by the Effective Date. This Class is unimpaired.  

The Debtor's owner will retain its ownership interest in the
Debtor.

The Debtor intends to fund the Plan from the refinance of its
property.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated October 4, 2022,
is available at https://bit.ly/3yq7WS8 from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Debtor's Counsel:

                  Matthew D. Resnik, Esq.
                  RHM LAW, LLP
                  17609 Ventura Blvd
                  Ste. 314
                  Encino, CA 91316
                  Tel: (818) 285-0100
                  Fax: (818) 855-7013
                  Email: matt@rhmfirm.com

                      About 1300U SPE LLC

1300U SPE LLC is a Single Asset Real Estate (as defined in 11
U.S.C. § 101(51B))

1300U SPE LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 22-14236) on August 4,
2022. In the petition filed by Robert W. Clippinger, as managing
member, the Debtor reported  assets between $10 million and $50
million and liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.

Matthew D. Resnik, of RHM Law LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


2370 FOREST: Exclusivity Period Extended to Dec. 1
--------------------------------------------------
2370 Forest, LLC received court approval to remain in control of
its bankruptcy while it pursues refinancing for its New Jersey
property.

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey extended
to Dec. 1 the company's exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan,
allowing the company to pursue refinancing to pay off the claim of
the mortgage holder, U.S. Bank National Association, and then
propose its own plan without the threat of a rival plan from
creditors.

Roshni Shah, Esq., attorney for 2370 Forest, said refinancing will
allow the company to retain the property and use it to generate
income.

In case refinancing is not available, the company will sell the
property, using the net proceeds to fund its Chapter 11 plan,
according to the attorney.

                         About 2370 Forest

2370 Forest LLC is a single asset real estate (as defined in 11
U.S.C. Sec. 101(51B)).

2370 Forest sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.N.J.
Case No. 22-13637) on May 3, 2022, with up to $50,000 in assets and
up to $1 million in liabilities. Arthur Spitzer, member, signed the
petition.

Judge Christine M. Gravelle oversees the case.

Scura, Wigfield, Heyer, Stevens & Cammarota, LLP serves as the
Debtor's legal counsel.


270 BERGER: Unsecureds to Get Nothing in Liquidating Plan
---------------------------------------------------------
270 Berger Real Estate, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of New Jersey a Disclosure Statement describing
Chapter 11 Plan dated October 4, 2022.

The Debtor is an New Jersey Limited Liability Company whose primary
asset is real property located at 308 Case Road, Lakewood, New
Jersey 08701 (the "Property").

The Debtor previously owner 4 separate properties, three of which
were lost to foreclosure around 2017 and 2018. The Debtor listed
its sole remaining Property in its schedules as having a value of
$325.000.

The Debtor filed Chapter 11 because the Property is in disrepair,
and the Debtor wishes to reduce the amounts owed to its two secured
creditors and rehabilitate the Property so that it can be marketed
as a rental property.

This is a plan of liquidation that provides for sale of the Debtor'
assets. The Effective Date of the proposed Plan is 30 days after
entry of an Order of the Bankruptcy Court confirming the Plan.

Class 1 consists of the Secured Claim of US Bank Trust National
Association in the amount of $258,137.42 secured by first mortgage
on real property owned by Debtor commonly known as 308 Case Road,
Lakewood, New Jersey. The Debtor proposes to cure prepetition
arrears by making 60 monthly payments on this claim in the amount
of $3,522.14. This figure includes the monthly base mortgage
payment as well as the cure payment at 4% interest pursuant to the
US Bank proof of claim. The Debtor values collateral at $325,000 as
indicated in its schedules.

Class 2 consists of the Secured Claim of Real Time Resolutions
("RTR") secured by second mortgage on real property owned by Debtor
commonly known as 308 Case Road, Lakewood, New Jersey filed as
Claim number 2 on the Claims Register of the Court in the total
amount of $222,341.24 which, pursuant to section 506(a) of the
Bankruptcy Code, is limited to the value in the collateral securing
its Secured Claim.

The secured claim of this creditor is subject to the first mortgage
held by US Bank and shall be bifurcated in to secured and unsecured
pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(a) and (d), its lien partially
avoided, and the mortgage partially unsecured. The secured portion
of this claim is in the amount of $66,862.58 and the Debtor
proposes to make monthly payments of $1,167.31 to pay off the
balance of the secured portion of the mortgage secured portion of
the mortgage at 4.75% interest pursuant to the RTR proof of claim.
The balance of the claim of this creditor is $155,478.66 and is
treated as unsecured and included in Class 3.

Class 3 consists of General unsecured claims in the amount of
$155,478.66. The Claims in this Class shall receive nothing as the
Debtor's assets do not support payments of any kind.

Class 4 consists of Ownership interests. This Class shall retain
ownership of its equity interests in the Debtor.

The Property has been marketed through Turpin realtors. The Debtor
shall continue to market the Property with the assistance of Turpin
Realtors postconfirmation, and ultimately sell the property. The
sale of the Property shall provide funds needed to pay creditors
under the Plan. The sale to a prospective buyer shall be subject to
approval of the Bankruptcy Court upon motion filed pursuant to
Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The sale shall be free and clear of all liens, claims and
encumbrances, with valid liens to attach to the proceeds of sale,
and any outstanding real property taxes or municipal assessments,
and the Secured Claim of M&T Bank, shall be paid at closing from
the proceeds of sale, and the Confirmation Order shall expressly so
provide. In the event the Foreclosure Action is permitted to
continue, M&T creditors shall be paid from the proceeds of the
sheriff sale in accordance with their respective priorities.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated October 4, 2022,
is available at https://bit.ly/3yunrbN from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Attorneys for Debtor:

     Timothy P. Neumann, Esq.
     Geoffrey Neumann, Esq.
     BROEGE, NEUMANN, FISCHER & SHAVER, LLC
     25 Abe Voorhees Drive
     Manasquan, New Jersey 08736
     Tel: (732) 223-8484
     Email: timtothy.neumann25@gmail.com
     Email: geoff.neumann@gmail.com

                         About 270 Berger 

270 Berger Real Estate, LLC, is an New Jersey Limited Liability
Company whose primary asset is real property located at 308 Case
Road, Lakewood, New Jersey 08701.

270 Berger Real Estate filed a bankruptcy Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 22-15665) on July 17, 2022.  The Debtor is
represented by Timothy P. Neumann, Esq. of BROEGE, NEUMANN, FISCHER
& SHAVER LLC.


4E BRANDS: Exclusivity Period Extended to Dec. 19
-------------------------------------------------
4e Brands Northamerica, LLC obtained a court order extending its
exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan to Dec. 19 and solicit
votes in favor of the plan to Feb. 18 next year.

The ruling by Judge David Jones of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Texas allows the company to pursue its own
plan without the threat of a rival plan from creditors.

Matthew Cavenaugh, Esq., one of 4e Brands' attorneys, said the
company's "substantial progress" in its bankruptcy case supports
the extension, including the filing of its Chapter 11 plan of
liquidation and obtaining court approval of the disclosure
statement.

The liquidating plan filed on Aug. 15 proposes to pay general
unsecured creditors 9.5% to 11.3% of their claims. General
unsecured creditors are entitled to vote on the plan.

                   About 4E Brands North America

4e Brands North America, LLC is a manufacturer of personal care and
hygiene products based in San Antonio, Texas. Its brand name
products include Blumen Hand Sanitizer, Assured Hand Sanitizer, and
various other hand sanitizers and hand soaps. The Debtor is no
longer operating.

4e Brands North America sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 22-50009) on Feb. 22, 2022, with up to
$50,000 in assets and up to $50 million in liabilities. David Dunn,
chief restructuring officer, signed the petition.

The case is handled by Judge David R. Jones.

Matthew D. Cavenaugh, Esq., at Jackson Walker, LLP is the Debtor's
legal counsel. Stretto is the claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 6 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on March 1, 2022. The committee tapped Tucker
Ellis, LLP as bankruptcy counsel; Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C. as
Texas counsel; and Oxford Restructuring Advisors, LLC as financial
advisor.


5280 AURARIA: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Dec 31
-----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado authorized
5280 Auraria, LLC to use cash collateral on an interim basis in
accordance with the budget, with a 15% variance, through December
31, 2022.

The Debtor is directed to provide DB Auraria, LLC and Auraria Stub,
LLC, on or before the 10th day of the following month, an
accounting for the prior month of all revenue, cash expenditures
and collections, with a comparison to budget, in substantially the
same form as that provided by the Receiver on September 6. The
Debtor will continue to file monthly operating reports with the
same type of information provided in prior reports.

The said provisions will be deemed adequate protection to the
lenders asserting an interest in cash collateral. To the extent
necessary under applicable law, each lender will be deemed to have
requested an administrative expense claim in respect thereof.

A final hearing on the matter is set for October 24 at 9:30 a.m.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3Ckb0Ao from
PacerMonitor.com.

                         About 5280 Auraria

5280 Auraria, LLC, owns Auraria Student Lofts, a high-rise building
in downtown Denver aimed at providing housing for college students.
5280 Auraria's sole member and manager is Nelson Partners, LLC, a
Utah limited liability company.  The individual principal is
Patrick Nelson.

5280 Auraria sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Col. Case No. 22-12059) on June 9, 2022.
In the petition filed by Patrick Nelson, as managing member, the
Debtor listed between $50 million and $100 million in both assets
and liabilities.

Judge Kimberley H. Tyson oversees the case.

Michael J. Pankow, Esq., at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP is
the Debtor's counsel.



772 & 720 HOLDING: Files for Chapter 11 to Fend Off Receiver
------------------------------------------------------------
772 & 720 Holding LLC filed on Sept. 30, 2022, for chapter 11
protection to retain control of its property from the receiver and
the lender.

The Debtor filed as a single asset real estate case with a
bare-bones petition, which fails to list the creditors of the
Debtor and the amounts of such creditors' debts.

The Debtor owns real property located at 720 57th Street, Brooklyn,
NY and 772 59th Street, Brooklyn, NY.  The 57th Street Property is
a mixed use building, comprised of approximately two commercial
units and seven residential units.  The 59th Street Property is
also mixed use, and is comprised of two commercial units and four
residential units.

In September of 2019, Fairview Investment Fund V, LP's
predecessor-in-interest, Corevest American Finance Lender LLC
("CAFL"), commenced that certain foreclosure action currently
pending in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of
Kings (the "State Court") bearing Index No. 519652/2019 styled
Fairview Investment Fund V, LP v. 772 & 720 Holding LLC, Bao Zhi
Liu and 772 59 Lender LLC (the "Foreclosure Action") against the
Debtor 772 & 720 Holding LLC (as borrower) and its sole member, Bao
Zhi Liu (as guarantor and, together with the borrower, the "Obligor
Defendants"), seeking, inter alia, to foreclose the Debtor's
property as a result of the Obligor Defendants' default on a
$7,518,000 commercial loan secured by the Property.

Upon CAFL's motion, and by Order to Appoint Receiver entered
January 8, 2020, the State Court appointed Edward Vincent, Esq.
with the "usual powers and directions" as temporary receiver.  The
Receiver, with the State Court's approval, engaged, inter alia,
Barton Schwartz, to assist in his property management duties.

CAFL subsequently, on or about March 31, 2021, transferred to
Fairview all of its right, title and interest in and to, inter
alia, the Secured Loan.

After filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, on Sept. 30, 2022, counsel
for the Debtor sent a letter to the Receiver demanding that he turn
over all property of the Debtor, including but not limited to bank
records, contracts, leases, bills, invoices, all other documents
related to the Property, and all funds in his possession or control
related to the Property.

Fairview Investment Fund V, LP, on Oct. 6, 2022, filed with the
Bankruptcy Court a motion to excuse the Receiver from complying
with the turnover provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 543(a), (b) and/or
(c), and permit the Receiver to continue in possession and control
of the Mortgaged Property and any amounts collected in connection
with the Mortgaged Property.

In its motion, Fairview, explains, "The Receiver has been in place
on the Mortgaged Property for almost three years.  Upon information
and belief, the Receiver is holding almost $400,000 in rents that
are part of the Mortgaged Property and security for Fairview's
mortgage lien. Notably, a substantial part (approximately $100,000)
of those funds has been or is to be used to pay outstanding water
charges and an additional $50,000 is to be distributed to
Landlord/Tenant Counsel pursuant to the Order for Interim Fees.
Given the Debtor's track record of contumacious conduct, turning
over those funds to the Debtor is the equivalent of putting the fox
in charge of the hen house, and actually put at risk the payment of
outstanding water charges, which hold a lien on the Mortgaged
Property.  Throughout the Foreclosure Action, the Debtor's acts and
omissions have shown that is acting in its own self-interest and in
complete disregard for and compliance with the Receivership Order,
the First Order to Compel and the Second Order to Compel. The
Debtor has not turned over rents it has collected, it has not
accounted for rents it has collected, it has failed to cooperate
with the Receiver's requests and State Court orders, and it now may
be defrauding the receivership by operating short-term rental out
of the Mortgaged Property behind the Receiver's back.  This conduct
reflects a contempt for the court's authority and self-dealing, far
worse than mismanagement, which on its own is more than enough to
meet the standard under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 543 to excuse the Receiver's
turnover of assets to the Debtor, particularly for the short period
of time sought to give Fairview an opportunity to seek the Court's
intervention by way of a motion for conversion, appointment of a
trustee, dismissal and/or relief from the stay to protect their
secured rights in the Mortgaged Property.

According to court filings, 772 & 720 Holding LLC estimates $10
million to $50 million in debt to 1 to 49 creditors.  The petition
states that funds will be available to unsecured creditors.

                    About 772 & 720 Holding LLC

772 & 720 Holding LLC is a Single Asset Real Estate (as defined in
11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(51B)).

772 & 720 Holding LLC filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code on Sept. 30, 2022. In the petition filed by
Bao Zhi Liu, as managing member, the Debtor reported assets and
liabilities between $10 million and $50 million.

The Debtor is represented by Julie Cvek Curley of Kirby Aisner &
Curley, LLP.


A&D TESTS: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------
A&D Tests, Inc. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Texas, Waco Division, for authority to use cash
collateral to continue its ongoing operations.

The U.S. Small Business Administration, ICB Advance, and
Corporation Service Company claim liens on the Debtor's personal
property including cash and accounts.

The Debtor says it can adequately protect the interests of the
Secured Lenders as set forth in the proposed Interim Order for Use
of Cash Collateral by providing the Secured Lenders with
postpetition liens, a priority claim in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy
case, and cash flow payments.

The Debtor intends to rearrange its affairs and needs to continue
to operate in order to pay its ongoing expenses, generate
additional income and to propose a plan in the case.

The Debtor asserts it is an emergency matter is it has no outside
sources of funding available and must rely on the use of cash
collateral to continue its operations.

A copy of the motion is available at https://bit.ly/3T2Ij1B from
PacerMonitor.com.

A copy of the budget is available at https://bit.ly/3rEjltV from
PacerMonitor.com.

The Debtor projects $135,110 in gross income and $133,454 in total
expenses for one month.

                     About A&D Tests, Inc.

A&D Tests, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 22-60436) on October 3,
2022. In the petition signed by Clanci Mitchell, vice president,
the Debtor disclosed up to $500,000 in both assets and
liabilities.

Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq., at Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney, PLLC, is
the Debtor's counsel.



A.G. DILLARD: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Oct 12
-----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Virginia,
Lynchburg Division, authorized A.G. Dillard, Inc. to use cash
collateral on an interim basis and provide adequate protection to
Blue Ridge Bank.

The Court said the aggregate use of cash collateral during the
Eighth Interim and Final Period will not exceed $56,405 as set
forth in the Budget. Should the Debtor's use of cash collateral
exceed the said amount, the Debtor's right to use cash collateral
will terminate absent the express written consent of the Bank or
further Court order.

The Debtor is indebted to the Bank and the Bank is secured in
connection with or pursuant to:

     (i) a Business Loan Agreement dated December 18, 2019, by and
between the Debtor and the Bank;

     (ii) a Promissory Note dated December 18, 2019, made by the
Debtor, payable to the order of the Bank in the original principal
amount of $4,000,000;

   (iii) a Loan Agreement dated September 25, 2020 by and between
the Debtor and the Bank;

    (iv) a U.S. Small Business Administration Note made by the
Debtor, payable to the order of the Bank in the original principal
amount of $5,000,000; and

     (v) a Commercial Security Agreement dated March 12, 2018,
granted by the Debtor in favor of the Bank.

The Debtor is in default under the Loan Documents.

As adequate protection, the Bank will have valid, enforceable and
perfected replacement liens on all of the Bank's post-petition date
collateral securing the obligations. The Replacement Liens will
remain effective and enforceable unless or until otherwise modified
by the Court.

The Replacement Liens will be perfected, enforceable, choate, and
effective without the necessity of the Bank taking any other action
to validate or perfect the security interests and Replacement Liens
granted to the Bank.

As further adequate protection to the Bank, the Debtor continue to
pay the Bank an amount equal to $4,000 per week.

Only to the extent the Adequate Protection is deemed to be
insufficient adequate protection under section 361 of the
Bankruptcy Code, the Bank will have a superpriority administrative
claim pursuant to sections 361 and 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code,
for which the Bank has the burden of proof.

A copy of the order and the Debtor's budget for the period from
September 23 to October 12, 2022, is available at
https://bit.ly/3RDKW9a from PacerMonitor.com.

The budget provides for total operating expenses, on a weekly
basis, as follows:

     $2,500 for the week ending September 23, 2022;
    $16,405 for the week ending September 30, 2022;
    $18,000 for the week ending October 7, 2022; and
     $3,500 for the week ending October 12, 2022.

                     About A.G. Dillard, Inc.

A.G. Dillard, Inc. is an excavating contractor in Troy, Virginia.
It provides a wide variety of site construction services, including
site remodeling, clearing and demolition, pond repair/conversion,
excavating and grading, site concrete, and paving.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Va. Case No. 22-60115) on February 9,
2022. In the petition signed by Alan G. Dillard, III, president,
the Debtor disclosed up to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities.

Judge Rebecca B. Connelly oversees the case.

Robert S. Westermann, Esq., at Hirschler Fleischer, PC is the
Debtor's counsel.

Blue Ridge Bank, as lender, is represented by Michael D. Mueller,
Esq. at Williams Mullen.



AC NW RETAIL: Reaches Deal With BBB, Files Plan
-----------------------------------------------
AC NW Retail Investment LLC and Armstrong New West Retail LLC filed
a Joint Plan of Liquidation and a Disclosure Statement.

Armstrong owns the commercial condominium space consisting of the
ground floor and basement level of 250 West 90th Street, New York,
New York.  The Property is a 20,000-square-foot space on the ground
and lower level.  The Property is encumbered by a mortgage in favor
of Ladder Capital Finance I LLC. Armstrong is 100% owned by AC NW
which in turn is 100% owned by Benjamin Ringel.

In August 2017, the Debtors sought Bankruptcy Court authority for
Armstrong to enter into a lease with Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. ("BBB")
which was granted by order entered on September 18, 2017.  BBB took
possession of the Property and operated a Harmon store from the
Property until February 28, 2022, at which time it ceased doing
business at the Property.  BBB is current in its Lease obligations
to Armstrong through September 2022.

The Debtors and BBB have negotiated a settlement agreement
("Settlement Agreement") that provides for, amongst other things,
BBB to pay Armstrong the sum of $1,964.579 ("Settlement Sum") in
exchange for the immediate termination of the BBB Lease and the
release of all of BBB's obligations under the BBB Lease.
Simultaneous with the filing of the Plan and Disclosure Statement,
the Debtors are filing their Bankruptcy Rule 9019 motion seeking
approval of the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Sum will be
utilized to implement the Debtors' Plan.

On September 28, 2022, the Debtors filed their Plan and Disclosure
Statement.

The Plan provides for the Property to be surrendered to the holder
of the Mortgage Loan as its indubitable equivalent in full and
final satisfaction of the Mortgage Loan.  If it is determined that
the surrender of the Property to the holder of the Mortgage Loan is
less than the indubitable equivalent of its secured claim, and that
the holder of the Mortgage Loan is entitled to an unsecured
deficiency claim, such claim will be classified and treated as an
unsecured claim against the Armstrong Debtor. Alternatively, the
Property will be sold at an auction.

The Plan further provides for payments to holders of Allowed Claims
in accordance with the priorities established by the Bankruptcy
Code to be made from the Plan Fund which consists of: (1) the
Debtors' available cash; (2) the BBB Settlement Sum; and, (3) to
the extent the Property is sold, the sale proceeds generated from
the auction sale of the Property. Debtors submit that the BBB
Settlement Sum along with the Debtors' available cash will result
in sufficient funds to satisfy payment to Armstrong's secured tax
debt, administrative claims, priority claims and a distribution to
Armstrong's unsecured creditors.

Holders of Class 4 Armstrong Unsecured Claims in the amount of
$185,289 are impaired and will receive their pro rata share of the
Plan Fund.  Holders of Class 7 AC NW Unsecured Claims in the amount
of $532,800 are also impaired and will receive their pro rata share
of the Plan Fund.

A copy of the Joint Disclosure Statement dated September 28, 2022,
is available at https://bit.ly/3RpNQ1b from PacerMonitor.com.

Attorneys for the Debtors:

     A. Mitchell Greene, Esq.
     LEECH TISHMAN ROBINSON BROG PLLC
     875 Third Avenue
     New York, NY 10022

                 About AC NW Retail Investment and
                     Armstrong New West Retail

Armstrong New West Retail, LLC owns a commercial condominium unit
located at 250 West 90th Street, New York. The property is a
20,000-square-foot space that was occupied by Atlantic and Pacific
Tea Company until March 2016 under its Food Emporium brand.

Armstrong is 100% owned by AC NW Retail Investment, LLC, which is
100% owned by Benjamin Ringel.

AC NW Retail Investment and Armstrong New West Retail filed Chapter
11 petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case Nos. 16-23085 and 16-23086) on
Aug. 9, 2016. Benjamin Ringel, sole equity member, signed the
petitions.

At the time of the filing, AC NW Retail estimated its assets at $10
million to $50 million and liabilities at $1 million to $10
million. Armstrong estimated its assets and liabilities at $10
million to $50 million.

Judge Robert D. Drain oversees the cases.

Arnold Mitchell Greene, Esq., at Leech Tishman Robinson Brog, PLLC
is the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel. The Law Offices of Lawrence J.
Berger, P.C. serves as special real estate tax counsel.


ACTIVA RESOURCES: Seeks to Extend Solicitation Period to Nov. 17
----------------------------------------------------------------
Activa Resources, LLC and Tiva Resources, LLC asked the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas to extend to
Nov. 17 the period to solicit votes in favor of their proposed plan
to exit Chapter 11 protection.

The companies need an extension of the solicitation period so that
it does not expire prior to the hearing on confirmation of their
proposed Chapter 11 plan, according to their attorney, Bernard
Given II, Esq., at Loeb & Loeb, LLP.

The companies on Aug. 19 filed a joint Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization, which proposes to pay in full all allowed claims,
including general unsecured claims.

A hearing to consider approval of the disclosure statement was
supposed to be held on Sept. 28 but the legal counsel for Texas
Capital Bank, a secured creditor, has an unavoidable conflict on
that date. As a result, the companies filed a motion to continue
the hearing to Oct. 13, which necessarily extends the time within
which the court can hold a hearing on confirmation of the plan.

             About Activa Resources and Tiva Resources

Activa Resources, LLC and Tiva Resources, LLC operate in the oil
and gas extraction industry. Both companies are based in San
Antonio, Texas.

On Feb. 3, 2022, Activa Resources and Tiva Resources sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D.
Texas Lead Case No. 22-50117). In the petitions signed by John
Hayes, president, Activa Resources disclosed as much as $50 million
in both assets and liabilities while Tiva Resources disclosed up to
$10 million in assets and up to $50 million in liabilities.

Judge Michael M. Parker oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Bernard R. Given II, Esq., at Loeb and Loeb, LLP
as legal counsel, and Haynie & Company as accountant and auditor.
Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc. is the claims, noticing and
solicitation agent.

On Aug. 19, 2022, the Debtors filed their proposed joint Chapter 11
plan of reorganization and disclosure statement.


ADAPTHEALTH LLC: Moody's Affirms Ba3 CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed AdaptHealth, LLC's Corporate
Family Rating at Ba3, the Probability of Default Rating at Ba3-PD
and the company's senior unsecured note rating at B1. The
Speculative Grade Liquidity remains unchanged at SGL-1. The outlook
was changed to stable from negative.

The affirmation of AdaptHealth's ratings reflects the company's
successful integration of its 2021 acquisition of AeroCare
Holdings, Inc. ("AeroCare"), and improved credit metrics following
the transaction. Leverage (debt/EBITDA inclusive of patient capex)
declined from roughly 4.2x to 3.8x for the twelve months ended June
30, 2022, in part from synergies realized and a disciplined
monetary policy focused on deleveraging. In addition, AdaptHealth
was able to address some of the supply chain pressures by
diversifying its suppliers base.

The outlook is revised to stable from negative as Moody's expects
the company will continue to execute a growth strategy that relies
on acquisitions but should be mostly funded with excess free cash
flow. Moody's anticipates that AdaptHealth will continue its track
record of successful acquisition integration and synergy
realization.

Rating Actions:

Affirmations:

Issuer: AdaptHealth, LLC

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba3

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba3-PD

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed B1 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: AdaptHealth, LLC

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

AdaptHealth's Ba3 Corporate Family Rating reflects the company's
meaningful scale in the provision of home healthcare equipment and
related supplies in the United States with sales exceeding $2.75
billion (LTM June 30, 2022). The company benefits from its focus on
a broad range of patient needs including sleep, home medical
equipment, diabetes and respiratory products, the majority of which
relate to chronic medical conditions with high levels of recurring
revenues. AdaptHealth is somewhat concentrated in sleep related
products which are approximately 36% of sales. As AdaptHealth's
addresses supply chain issues for sleep products, Moody's forecasts
margins to expand and the proportion of sleep products to increase
closer to 40% of revenue. Further, the company benefits from a
national platform, that was expanded following the acquisition of
AeroCare.

The rating is constrained by the company's aggressive approach to
acquisitions, albeit the pace of acquisitions have slowed since the
AeroCare purchase, Moody's expects the pace to reach pre-AeroCare
levels in 2023. The company's leverage, which no longer excludes
Patient Capital Expenditures, is in the high three times range for
the last twelve months ended June 30, 2022. Moody's expects
debt/EBITDA will reach three times in the next 12 to 18 months. The
pace of deleveraging will depend on the company's appetite for
future acquisitions and the ramp of the sleep business as supply
chain disruptions are resolved.

The SGL-1 Speculative Grade Liquidity rating reflects the company's
very good liquidity profile. Cash is approximately $119 million as
of June 30, 2022, and Moody's expects the company will generate
around $100 million of free cash flow (before acquisitions) in the
next 12-18 months. The company has a $450 million revolving credit
facility which Moody's expects will remain substantially unused.
The company's secured term loan agreements are subject to maximum
leverage and minimum fixed charge covenants which have ample
headroom. The company has limited alternative sources of liquidity
as substantially all assets are pledged.

The outlook is stable as Moody's expects the company will continue
to execute a growth strategy that relies on acquisitions but should
be mostly funded with excess free cash flow. Moody's anticipates
that AdaptHealth will continue its track record of successful
acquisition integration and synergy realization.

AdaptHealth's unsecured notes are rated B1, one notch below the Ba3
Corporate Family Rating. The rating of the senior unsecured bonds
reflects their structural subordination to the secured debt in the
company's capital structure, comprised of the $450 million
(unrated/undrawn) revolving credit facility and a $800 million
(unrated) term loan. Both the revolver and term loan are due in
January 2026.

ESG considerations have a moderately negative impact on
AdaptHealth's rating. AdaptHealth has a highly negative credit
exposure to environmental risks (E-4). As a distributor utilizing a
fossil fuel dependent truck fleet, AdaptHealth has highly negative
exposure to carbon transition risk related to the carbon footprint
of its truck fleet. The company also has moderately negative
exposure to risks associated with waste and pollution arising from
fleet emissions. AdaptHealth's credit exposure to social risk
considerations is highly negative (S-4). AdaptHealth faces elevated
social risks particularly related to demographic and societal
trends as about one third of the company's revenue is derived from
Medicaid and Medicare programs, making the company subject to
federal and state regulations related to the reimbursement of its
products and services. Although this risk is mitigated by the
company's diversity by product line.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Ratings could be upgraded if the company sustains debt/EBITDA below
3 times while maintaining a good liquidity profile and ongoing
successful execution of integrating acquisitions. Further
diversification by payor, product and geography, and increased
scale, would also be positive credit factors to warrant an
upgrade.

Ratings could be downgraded if the company is unable to
successfully integrate acquisitions or if financial policies become
more aggressive. Quantitatively, ratings could be downgraded if the
company sustains debt/EBITDA above 4 or if liquidity erodes or the
company's free cash flow generation weakens.

Headquartered in Plymouth Meeting, PA, AdaptHealth, LLC is a
provider of home healthcare equipment and medical supplies to the
home and related services in the United States. The company's
products cover a range of products to address chronic conditions
such as sleep therapies, oxygen and related therapies in the home
and other home medical devices and supplies needed by chronically
ill patients with diabetes, wound care, urology, ostomy and
nutrition supply needs AdaptHealth services approximately 3.9
million patients annually in nearly all 50 states through a network
of over 759 locations in 47 states. Revenues, exceeded $2.75
billion as of LTM ending June 30, 2022.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Services published in November 2021.


ALCARAZ CATERING: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Oct 11
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California
authorized Alcaraz Catering, Inc. to use cash collateral on an
interim basis in accordance with the budget and its agreement with
the U.S. Small Business Administration through October 11, 2022.

The Debtor is permitted to use cash collateral to pay ordinary and
necessary expenses to operate the Debtor's business.

The Debtor is directed to keep track of the expenses paid during
the period and circulate what expenses were paid to the Trustee,
counsel for the SBA and counsel for Prime Alliance Bank no later
than 10 a.m. on October 11.

A continued hearing on the matter is set for October 11 at 2 p.m.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3ykpa3d from
PacerMonitor.com.

                     About Alcaraz Catering

Alcaraz Catering Inc. is a catering company.

Alcaraz Catering filed a petition for relief under Subchapter V of
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
22-10622) on August 13, 2022. In the petition filed by Antonio
Alcaraz, as president, the Debtor reported assets and liabilities
between $1 million and $10 million each.

Susan K. Seflin has been appointed as Subchapter V trustee.

The Law Offices of Kenneth H.J. Henjum is the Debtor's counsel.



ALLTECH INC: Moody's Affirms 'B2' CFR & Alters Outlook to Negative
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the ratings of Alltech, Inc.,
including the B2 Corporate Family Rating, B2-PD Probability of
Default Rating, and B2 ratings on the company's senior secured
first lien revolving credit facilities and senior secured first
lien term loans. Moody's revised the outlook to negative from
stable.

The outlook revision to negative from stable reflects Moody's
expectation that Alltech's operating performance will remain weak
and free cash flow will remain strained in the next 12 months as
the company faces volume declines, inflationary headwinds and
supply chain challenges. As of June 30, 2022, Alltech's Moody's
adjusted debt to EBITDA was 5.3x, which Moody's considers high for
the company's B2 CFR. In addition, free cash flow in the LTM period
ended June 30, 2022 was negative ($-40 million) as a result of
higher working capital requirements due to inflationary headwinds
which caused an increase in the cost of the company's inventory. In
addition, supply chain challenges have necessitated the need for
the company to hold larger amounts of inventory, which has also led
to higher working capital requirements.

Moody's nonetheless affirmed the ratings because the company has
potential to reduce Moody's adjusted debt-EBITDA leverage to below
5x within the next 12 to 18 months through EBITDA growth in 2023 if
price increases successfully offset inflationary pressures and
commodity prices continue to decline. The affirmation also reflects
Moody's expectation that the company's $57 million cash balance as
of June 30, 2022 and $264 million of availability on the $305
million revolver ($41 million drawn as of June 2022) provide
adequate liquidity to fund the debt service including the $22.6
million of required term loan amortization over the next year.
Moody's expects a partial reversal of inventory builds and EBITDA
growth to lead to break even to slightly positive free cash flow in
2023 despite higher cash interest costs, albeit the company does
have interest rate hedges on 85% of its debt through 2024.

Affirmations:

Issuer: Alltech, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B2

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B2-PD

Senior Secured First Lien Term Loan A, Affirmed B2 (LGD4)

Senior Secured First Lien Term Loan B, Affirmed B2 (LGD4)

Senior Secured First Lien Multicurrency Revolving A Credit
Facility, Affirmed B2 (LGD4)

Senior Secured First Lien Revolving B Credit Facility, Affirmed B2
(LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Alltech, Inc.

Outlook, Changed To Negative From Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Alltech's B2 CFR reflects the company's leading position in the
very specialized and fragmented animal feed specialty ingredients
industry, very strong customer and geographic diversification, and
good liquidity. Offsetting these factors are the company's high
financial leverage with Moody's adjusted debt/EBITDA of 5.3x as of
the LTM period ended June 30, 2022, historically volatile free cash
flow, and exposure to the volatility of the protein and agriculture
industry cycles. In addition, Moody's views the existence of AWW
Holdings, Inc.'s (parent company of Alltech) 15% payment-in-kind
(PIK) preferred shares ($232 million accreted value as of June
2022) as a credit negative given potential leveraging event risk
should management decide to redeem this security, which is
redeemable beginning in May 2023. Although these shares are
subordinate to Alltech's existing debt, management could issue
incremental debt or use Alltech's liquidity to fund the redemption
of these securities, which are convertible into 25% ownership of
Alltech. Alltech has the option to pay dividends in cash but
Moody's does not believe this is likely given the company's
projected free cash flow. The high PIK accretion rate leads to an
increasingly meaningful amount of equity capital ahead of the Lyons
family equity, which creates an incentive to redeem the
instrument.

Alltech's science based proprietary technology allows the company
to provide unique sustainable feed solutions for farmers. The
company does not sell anti-biotic medicated specialty feed
ingredients and is one of the largest non-pharmaceutical animal
health companies in the world. As such, current societal trends of
improved animal welfare and reduced environmental impact are a
strong tailwind. Offsetting this tailwind is the company's
susceptibility to end market farmer conditions. In a weak economic
environment for farmers, the company could see a decline in
revenues and EBITDA as its customers may forego or reduce the use
of Alltech's higher margin specialty ingredients products.
Alltech's specialty ingredients business represents approximately
37% of its overall revenues and 60% of its EBITDA. Considering the
large portion of its EBITDA that is derived from the specialty
ingredients business, an economic downtown for farmers could have a
negative impact on the company's revenue, cash flow and credit
metrics.

Moody's expects that Alltech, Inc. will operate with adequate
liquidity. This incorporates the company's $57 million of cash as
of June 30, 2022, and Moody's projection for approximately $10-15
million in free cash flow in the next 12 months, approximately $264
million of availability on the $305 million revolver, and no
meaningful debt maturities through 2026. The cash sources provide
ample resources for the $22.6 million of required annual
amortization, reinvestment needs and potential acquisitions.

ESG considerations have a highly negative credit impact (CIS-4) on
Alltech. The company's ESG attributes have a discernible negative
impact on the current credit rating. Alltech's credit impact score
reflects highly negative exposure to environmental and governance
risks, along with moderately negative exposure to social risk. The
main environmental risks for Alltech stems from its water
management and natural capital risks. The company's main social
risks stem from its customer relations, human capital, and health &
safety risks. Alltech's highly negative governance risk stems from
its aggressive financial policies and lack of an independent board
under family ownership.

Alltech's credit exposure to environmental risk is highly negative
(E-4). This reflects Alltech's highly negative exposure to water
management and natural capital risks, which stem from the necessary
use of agricultural products and water in producing its products.
The company's efforts to improve animal health and digestion are
also meant to diminish the environmental impact of both the
sourcing of agricultural products and the animal emissions, but do
not fully mitigate the reliance on natural capital and water.

Credit exposure to social risks is moderately negative (S-3).
Alltech's social risk stems from moderately negative customer
relations, human capital, and health & safety risks. Customer
relations risk is moderately negative as the company has over
40,000 customers and must remain reliant on brand perception.
Alltech has over 5,000 employees and has moderately negative human
capital risk as many of these employees are specialized scientists
who develop its products. The health and safety of employees is
also a moderately negative risk because of the operation of
machinery. Demographic and societal trend risks are neutral to low
because the focus on improved animal welfare and reduced
environmental impact are a strong tailwind for the company's animal
feed and specialty ingredients products that aim to increase animal
health and digestion. This positive demand influence helps to
mitigate risks related to the investment necessary to continually
develop products that remain competitive amid changing consumer and
customer demand.

Alltech's exposure to governance risk is highly negative (G-4),
which reflects the company's aggressive financial policies under
family ownership (the Lyons family) including high leverage and the
existence of $232 million 15% payment-in-kind preferred shares at
AWW Holdings, Inc., Alltech's parent company. Although these shares
are subordinate to Alltech's existing debt, they pose event risk as
management could issue incremental debt or use Alltech's liquidity
to fund the redemption of these securities which are convertible
into 25% ownership of Alltech and have an onerous coupon rate. The
company's lack of an independent board is a very highly negative
risk because concentrated decision making creates potential for
event risk and decisions that favor shareholders over creditors.
Management's credibility and track record risk is moderately
negative based on management's good experience and operating
performance.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be upgraded if organic growth is consistently
positive, the company generates consistent and comfortably positive
free cash flow, maintains good liquidity, and Moody's adjusted debt
to EBITDA is sustained below 4.0x. Alternatively, ratings could be
downgraded if EBITDA declines, free cash flow is low or negative,
liquidity deteriorates, or Moody's adjusted debt-to-EBTIDA is
sustained above 5.0x.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Protein and
Agriculture published in November 2021.

Headquartered in Nicholasville, Kentucky, Alltech, Inc. is a
manufacturer and distributor of animal feed and specialty
ingredients used primarily in the production of animal proteins and
products (i.e beef, poultry, dairy, pork, etc.). Alltech is
privately held by the Lyons family. Revenue for the 12 months ended
June 30, 2022 was approximately $2.0 billion.


ALTERA INFRASTRUCTURE: Committee Taps Pachulski as Co-Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Altera
Infrastructure LP and its affiliates seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to employ
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones, LLP as co-counsel with Friedman
Kaplan Seiler & Adelman, LLP.

The firm's services include:

     a. assisting the committee in its consultations with the
Debtors regarding the administration of their Chapter 11 cases;

     b. assisting the committee in analyzing the Debtors' assets
and liabilities, investigating the extent and validity of liens and
participating in and reviewing any proposed asset sales, any asset
dispositions, financing arrangements and cash collateral
stipulations or proceedings;

     c. assisting the committee in any manner relevant to reviewing
and determining the Debtors' rights and obligations under leases
and other executory contracts;

     d. assisting the committee in investigating the acts, conduct,
assets, liabilities and financial condition of the Debtors, the
Debtors' operations and the desirability of the continuance of any
portion of those operations, and any other matters relevant to the
cases or to the formulation of a Chapter 11 plan;

     e. representing the committee in the negotiation, formulation,
or objection to any plan of liquidation or reorganization;

     f. advising the committee on the issues concerning the
appointment of a trustee or examiner under Section 1104 of the
Bankruptcy Code;

     g. advising the committee of its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Rules and assisting in
performing other services;

     h. assisting the committee in the evaluation of claims and in
any litigation matters, including avoidance actions and claims
against directors, officers and any other party; and

     i. providing other necessary services to the committee.

Pachulski will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners              $945 - $1,775
     Of Counsel            $725 - $1,425
     Associates            $675 - $825
     Paraprofessionals     $460 - $495

The firm will also be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses
incurred.

Michael Warner, Esq., a partner at Pachulski, assured the court
that his firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases, Mr.
Warner disclosed in court filings that his firm has not agreed to a
variation of its standard or customary billing arrangements, and
that no Pachulski professional has varied his rate based on the
geographic location of the Debtors' bankruptcy cases.

As committee counsel, Pachulski anticipates that the budget for
committee professionals will be governed by the terms of the order
that may be entered approving the Debtors' motions for use of cash
collateral and DIP financing, Mr. Warner added.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Michael D. Warner, Esq.
     Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP
     440 Louisiana Street, Suite 900
     Houston, TX 77002
     Tel: 713-691-9385
     Fax: 713-691-9407
     Email: mwarner@pszjlaw.com

                    About Altera Infrastructure

Westhill, United Kingdom-based Altera Infrastructure L.P. (NYSE:
ALIN-A) is a global energy infrastructure services partnership
primarily focused on the ownership and operation of critical
infrastructure assets in the offshore oil regions of the North
Sea,
Brazil and the East Coast of Canada. Altera has consolidated assets
of approximately $3.8 billion comprised of 44 vessels, including
floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) units, shuttle
tankers, floating storage and offtake (FSO) units, long-distance
towing and offshore installation vessels and a unit for maintenance
and safety (UMS). The majority of Altera's fleet is employed on
medium-term, stable contracts.

After agreeing to a debt-for-equity plan with bank lenders and
owner Brookfield, Altera Infrastructure LP and 37 affiliate sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Texas Lead Case No. 22-90130) on
Aug. 12, 2022. Judge Marvin Isgur oversees the cases.

As of the petition date, the Debtors were liable for approximately
$1.6 billion in aggregate principal amount of funded debt.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Jackson Walker LLP, and Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan LLP serve as the Debtors' lead counsel, local
counsel, and special counsel, respectively. The Debtors also tapped
Evercore Group LLC as investment banker and PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP as tax compliance, tax consulting, and accounting advisory
services provider. Stretto is the claims agent. David Rush, senior
managing director at FTI Consulting, Inc., serves as restructuring
advisor to the Debtors.

The DIP Lenders are represented by Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &
Garrison LLP, as counsel to the DIP Lenders, Ducera Partners LLC,
as financial advisor, and Porter & Hedges LLP, as their Texas
counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 7 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Aug. 22, 2022. The unsecured creditors
committee tapped Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman, LLP and
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones, LLP as legal counsels; and
AlixPartners, LLP as financial advisor.

A committee of coordinators was appointed under and as defined in
the appointment letter originally dated May 6, 2022, among Altera
Infrastructure LP and each member of the CoCom. The CoCom is
represented by Norton Rose Fulbright US, LLP and Norton Rose
Fulbright, LLP as legal counsel and PJT Partners (UK) Ltd. as
financial advisor.


ARETE REHABILITATION: Files Subchapter V Case
---------------------------------------------
Arete Rehabilitation Inc. filed for chapter 11 protection in the
District of New Hampshire.  The Debtor elected on its voluntary
petition to proceed under Subchapter V of chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The Debtor sought and obtained an order extending its deadline to
file its schedules and statements to Oct. 21, 2022.

Arete Rehabilitation listed total debt of at least $1 million and
between 100 and 199 creditors.  The petition states that funds will
be available to unsecured creditors.

A meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. Section 341(a) is slated for
Oct. 31, 2022, at 1:00 PM at Telephonic Meeting of Creditors.

                    About Arete Rehabilitation

Arete Rehabilitation Inc. -- https://www.areterehab.com/ --
specializes in older adult care, Arete Rehab provides physical,
occupational, and speech therapy services in the north east.

Arete Rehabilitation filed a petition for relief under Subchapter V
of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.H. Case No.
22-10477) on Sept. 28, 2022.  In the petition filed by Dr. Janet L.
Mahoney, as president and CEO, the Debtor reported assets between
$500,000 and $1 million and estimated liabilities between $1
million and $10 million.

James S. LaMontagne has been appointed as Subchapter V trustee.

The Debtor is represented by William J. Amann of Amann Burnett,
PLLC.


B&G PROPERTY: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
--------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 18 appointed an official committee to
represent unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of B&G
Property Investments, LLC.

The committee members are:

     1. Forge Trust Co.
        129 Almond St.
        Ashland, OR 97520
        Attention: Allen Thomashefsky
        Phone: (541) 261-7700
        Email: allen@drtom.net

     2. Charles McGlade
        4055 Spring Blvd.
        Eugene, OR 97405
        Phone: (503) 913-1273
        Email: mcgladecharles@gmail.com

     3. Stanley J. Ruff
        1920 SE 44th Ave.
        Portland, OR 97215
        Phone: (541) 510-6509
        Email: stanruff@gmail.com
  
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                   About B&G Property Investments

B&G Property Investments, LLC, a company in Medford, Ore., filed
its voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ore. Case No. 22-60998) on July 29,
2022, with between $10 million and $50 million in both assets and
liabilities. Keith Boyd, manager, signed the petition.

Judge Thomas M. Renn presides over the case.

Douglas R. Ricks, Esq., at Vanden Bos & Chapman, LLP and John
Warekois, CPA LLC serve as the Debtor's legal counsel and
accountant, respectively.


BAUSCH HEALTH: Moody's Cuts Rating on Sec. First Lien Debt to Caa1
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded certain ratings of Bausch
Health Companies Inc. ("Bausch Health") and certain of its
subsidiaries. The downgraded ratings include the senior secured
first lien rating of Bausch Health to Caa1 from B3, the senior
unsecured rating of Bausch Health and subsidiary Bausch Health
Americas, Inc. to Ca from Caa3, and the Speculative Grade Liquidity
Rating to SGL-3 from SGL-2.

At the same time, Moody's affirmed Bausch Health's Caa2 Corporate
Family Rating, Caa3 senior secured second lien rating, and Caa3-PD
Probability of Default Rating, which is appended with the /LD
designation to signify a limited default related to the company's
recently completed debt exchange. Moody's views the debt exchange
transaction as a distressed exchange, which is an event of default
under Moody's definition.

In addition, Moody's affirmed the B1 senior secured rating of
Bausch + Lomb Corporation.

The outlook on all entities remains negative.

The downgrades of Bausch Health's senior secured first lien rating
to Caa1 from B3 and senior unsecured rating to Ca from Caa3 reflect
the capital structure shift following the debt exchange, which
weakens coverage for both secured and unsecured lenders. The debt
exchange results in a reduction in unsecured debt of approximately
$5.4 billion, with first-lien secured debt of Bausch Health rising
by $1.8 billion and new second lien debt of Bausch Health of $352
million. The downgrade of the secured rating to Caa1 from B3 is
different than Moody's earlier expectations. This largely reflects
Moody's concerns about more challenging conditions in global
financial markets including rising interest rates, volatility in
asset prices and decreased market access. Bausch Health is highly
exposed to these conditions due to its untenable capital structure
in light of Xifaxan generic risk and the potential Bausch + Lomb
spinoff. As a result, Moody's believe there is a greater range of
potential expected loss scenarios on the company's first lien debt
relative to Moody's prior expectations, resulting in the lower
rating.

The downgrade of the Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating to SGL-3
from SGL-2 reflects a reduction in liquidity related to increasing
uncertainty about the timing of any Xifaxan generic launch or the
proposed Bausch + Lomb spin-off, where either event would reduce
cash flow as well as result in declining cushion under financial
maintenance covenants in the revolver. The company's cash flow is
susceptible to large deterioration if a generic version of Xifaxan
is launched. That said, Moody's views the company's liquidity as
adequate based on ongoing free cash flow prior to any generic
launch, cushion under the revolver covenant, and the absence of any
near-term debt maturities.

Governance risk is a consideration in the rating action. The debt
restructuring transaction has negative implications for creditors
as it relates to financial strategy and risk management.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Bausch Health Companies Inc.

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded
to Ca (LGD4) from Caa3 (LGD4)

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Downgraded to
SGL-3 from SGL-2

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Downgraded to
Caa1 (LGD2) from B3 (LGD2)

Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to
Caa1 (LGD2) from B3 (LGD2)

Issuer: Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded
to Ca (LGD4) from Caa3 (LGD4)

Affirmations:

Issuer: Bausch Health Companies Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Caa2

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Caa3-PD/LD
(/LD appended)

Senior Secured Second Lien Regular Bond/Debenture,
Affirmed Caa3 (LGD3) from (LGD4)

Issuer: Bausch + Lomb Corporation

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed B1 (LGD1)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

Outlook, Remains Negative

Issuer: Bausch Health Companies Inc.

Outlook, Remains Negative

Issuer: Bausch + Lomb Corporation

Outlook, Remains Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

Bausch Health's Caa2 Corporate Family Rating reflects its high
financial leverage with gross debt/EBITDA of over 7x. Although
recent debt restructuring reduces pro forma debt/EBITDA to about
6.5x on a total-company basis, the credit profile is constrained by
the potential genericization of Xifaxan - the company's largest
product. A recent court decision invalidated certain Xifaxan
patents and validated others. Despite uncertain timing, the
overhang has led to an untenable capital structure. A planned
spin-off of Bausch + Lomb would increase business risks due to
reduced scale and diversity. Timing remains uncertain as the
company evaluates many factors including legal exposures related to
the proposed spin-off.

These risks are tempered by the company's significant global scale
and diversity. Underlying utilization trends of most of the
company's core products are solid, and apart from Xifaxan there is
low exposure to other patent expirations. The credit profile is
supported by solid free cash flow prior to any generic Xifaxan
launch.

ESG considerations are material to Bausch Health's credit profile,
reflected in the Credit Impact Score of CIS-5, Very Highly
Negative. Bausch Health faces very highly negative governance risk
exposures, reflected in the G-5 score. Despite a consistent debt
reduction strategy, gross debt/EBITDA has remained persistently
high, creating financial strategy and risk management exposures
which are now elevated following the Xifaxan court ruling. In
addition, the company faces execution risk in completing the Bausch
+ Lomb spinoff as well as subsequently operating the remaining
Bausch Pharma business, highlighting management credibility and
track record risks. In addition, like other pharmaceutical
companies Bausch Health has highly negative exposures to social
risks, reflected in the S-4 score. These exposures include a
variety of unresolved legal issues, notwithstanding significant
progress to date at resolving such matters. Other social risks
include exposure to regulatory and legislative efforts aimed at
reducing drug pricing. Bausch Health's product and geographic
diversification help mitigate some of that exposure, as well as
business lines outside of branded pharmaceuticals.

The negative outlook reflects the potential for additional credit
degradation that would ensue from a generic Xifaxan launch, a
spin-off of Bausch + Lomb Corporation, or from additional
distressed exchange transactions. The separation of Bausch + Lomb
Corporation remains uncertain, but would be credit negative based
on reduced scale, diversity and earnings, leaving remaining company
more vulnerable to the impact of Xifaxan generic risk.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Factors that could lead to a downgrade include generic competition
for Xifaxan, a spin-off of Bausch + Lomb, deteriorating liquidity
or additional transactions that increase the probability of default
or expected loss.

Factors that could lead to an upgrade include clarity in avoiding
or delaying generic competition for Xifaxan, solid operating
performance, and successful pipeline execution of new rifaximin
formulations. Debt reduction would also improve the company's
credit profile.

Bausch Health Companies Inc. is a global company that develops,
manufactures and markets a range of pharmaceutical, medical device
and over-the-counter products. These are primarily in the
therapeutic areas of eye health, gastroenterology and dermatology.
Revenues for the 12 months ended June 30, 2022 totaled
approximately $8.2 billion.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Pharmaceuticals
published in November 2021.


BERWICK CLINIC: Recovery for Unsecureds Still to Be Determined
--------------------------------------------------------------
Berwick Clinic Company, LLC, filed with the u.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan a Small Business Plan of
Reorganization under Subchapter V dated October 3, 2022.

The Debtor operates a vascular clinic in Berwick, Pennsylvania that
employs approximately 10 employees and is currently working out of
one location. It has 1 Nurse Practitioner, and 1 employed
physician.

The Debtor contemplates ceasing operating the vascular clinic as of
October 31, 2022 and continuing to collect receivables while it is
cost-effective. An entity related to Debtor by common ownership,
Berwick Hospital Company LLC, filed a chapter 11 subchapter V
bankruptcy on September 30, 2022. Debtor does not believe that the
filing of the related entity will affect patient care or the
Debtor's financial affairs.

Debtor filed its chapter 11 bankruptcy for several reasons,
including, inter alia, to downsize so that it could maximize its
resources for the benefit of all constituencies. Through this
chapter 11 filing, Debtor seeks to, among other things, provide for
ongoing patient care, and to pay creditors and interest holders
over time as required by the Bankruptcy Code.

Debtor anticipates that the allowed amount of priority unsecured
claims will be no more than $61,000. This is an unimpaired class
and will be paid in full on the Effective Date.

General unsecured Claims are not secured by property of the estate
and are not entitled to priority under § 507(a) of the Code. The
Class GUC shall be paid on the Effective Date in full satisfaction
of their claims. Because it is unclear as to the base amount of
claims, it cannot be determined what percentage unsecured creditors
will receive. In any event, general unsecured creditors will
receive a greater distribution than they would in a chapter 7
liquidation.

Plan payments will be made by the Debtor directly. Debtor
anticipates that the allowed amount of general non priority
unsecured claims will be approximately $529,157.33 after the PPP
loans are forgiven and the insider claims be subordinated for
purposes of payment but not voting. $5,000 will be contributed to
the pot plan for payment of the general unsecured creditor class,
to be distributed pro rata.

Priyam Sharma is the sole equity holder of the Debtor. Priyam
Sharma shall retain her equity interest in the reorganized Debtor
in the same manner, nature, and extent as prior to the Petition
Date. Upon the completion of the Plan Payments, Ms. Sharma shall
own the Debtor free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances
as the Plan Payments shall be in full satisfaction of all claims
and administrative expenses.

On the Effective Date, Priyam Sharma or her designee shall
contribute sufficient funds to fund the Plan Payments in addition
to cash on hand and the collection of receivables. Upon the payment
of the Plan Payments, all claims and expenses as to Debtor shall be
deemed satisfied and Priyam Sharma or her designee shall own the
Debtor free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances. On
Confirmation of the Plan, all property of the Debtor, tangible and
intangible, including, without limitation, licenses, furniture,
fixtures and equipment, will revert, free and clear of all Claims
and Equitable Interests except as provided in the Plan, to the
Debtor.

The Officers of the Debtor immediately prior to the Effective Date
shall serve as the initial Officers of the Reorganized Debtor on
and after the Effective Date. Each Officer shall serve in
accordance with applicable non-bankruptcy law and the Debtor's
governing documents and the provisions of this plan, as they may be
amended from time to time. Debtor's sole officer is Priyam Sharma.

A full-text copy of the Plan of Reorganization dated October 3,
2022, is available at https://bit.ly/3fKUWjv from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorneys for Debtor:

     Robert Bassel, Esq.
     P.O. Box T
     Clinton, MI 49236
     Phone: (248) 835-7683
     Email: bbassel@gmail.com

                   About Berwick Clinic Company

Berwick Clinic Company, LLC, operates a health-care business in
Bloomfield Hills, Mich.

Berwick Clinic filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case
No. 22 45589) on July 18, 2022, disclosing $100,000 to $500,000 in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities. Priyam Sharma,
a principal at Berwick Clinic, signed the petition.

Judge Lisa S. Gretchko oversees the case.

Berwick Clinic tapped Robert Bassel, Esq., a practicing attorney in
Clinton, Mich., to handle its Chapter 11 case.


BONA VISTA 1606: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Bona Vista 1606, LLC.
  
                       About Bona Vista 1606

Bona Vista 1606, LLC filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
S.D. Fla. Case No. 22-16461) on Aug. 22, 2022, with up to $1
million in both assets and liabilities. Judge Robert A. Mark
oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by Joel M. Aresty, P.A.


BUCKHARDT TECHNOLOGIES: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 3
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
Eastern Division, authorized Buckardt Technologies, Inc., dba
Konsultek, to use cash collateral on an interim basis in accordance
with the budget through November 3, 2022.

BMO Harris Bank, N.A. asserts a senior valid blanket lien upon the
Debtor's assets. It holds a senior security interest in all of the
Debtor's assets by way of a valid lien duly filed of which the
amount due and owing totals no less than $381,719.

The other potential lien holders are Funding Circle, the Small
Business Administration, Internal Revenue Service, and Ingram
Micro, Inc.

In return for the Debtor's continued interim use of cash
collateral, and for any diminution in value of Prepetition Secured
Lender's interest in the cash collateral from and after the
Petition date, the Prepetition Secured Lender will receive an
administrative expense claim pursuant to Section 507(b) of the
Code.

In further return for the Debtor's continued interim use of cash
collateral, the Prepetition Secured Lender will receive a
replacement lien upon all of the Debtor's assets.

The Prepetition Secured Lender and all other subordinate lien
holders are granted replacement liens, attaching to the Collateral,
but only to the extent of their prepetition liens and only to the
extent of priority that existed on the date of filing.

The liens granted will be valid, perfected, and enforceable without
any further action by the Debtor and/or the Prepetition Secured
Lender and need not be separately documented.

The further hearing on the matter is scheduled for November 3 at 11
a.m.

A copy of the order and the Debtor's budget is available at
https://bit.ly/3Eoo76k from PacerMonitor.com.

The Debtor projects $223,379 in total expenses.

                About Buckardt Technologies, Inc.

Buckardt Technologies, Inc. is an information and security
technology consulting firm. Buckardt sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No.
22-04420) on April 18, 2022. In the petition signed by Judith A.
Buckardt, president, the Debtor disclosed up to $50,000 in assets
and up to $10 million in liabilities.

Judge Lashonda A. Hunt oversees the case.

Richard G. Larsen, Esq., at SpringerLarsenGreene, LLC is the
Debtor's counsel.



BUSINESS CREDIT: Amends Hackenberg & Stark County Secured Claims
----------------------------------------------------------------
Business Credit Solutions of Ohio, LLC, submitted an Amended Plan
of Reorganization dated October 3, 2022.

This Amended Plan of Reorganization proposes to pay and resolve all
creditors' claims against the Debtor from the liquidation of the
Debtor's real property pursuant to the terms of this Plan.

This Plan provides for (3) classes of secured claims; (1) class of
unsecured claims; and (1) class of equity security holders. General
unsecured creditors holding allowed claims will receive a lump sum
dividend of 100% within ninety days of the effective date of the
Plan. This Plan also provides for the payment of unclassified
administrative and priority claims in full on the  Effective Date
of this Plan with respect to any such claim.

Since filing, the Debtor has continued to operate and rent its
properties. In early 2022, the Debtor sought and obtained court
approval to sell the Canton Real Estate for the sum of $320,000.00.
On September 21, 2022, the Debtor filed a notice with the Court
disclosing its inability to close on the proposed sale due to the
proposed buyer's inability to obtain funding. Hackenberg obtained
relief from the automatic stay on September 22, 2022, as a result
of Debtor's inability to close on the sale.

Notwithstanding his obtaining relief from the automatic stay to
proceed with the prepetition foreclosure action, Hackenberg has
agreed to accept title to the Canton Real Estate and satisfy all
outstanding real estate taxes due on the Canton Real Estate upon
confirmation of plan, and in full satisfaction of his claim against
the estate and Jeffrey Melton.

In addition to the Canton Real Estate, Debtor is also the owner a
parcel of real property located at 943 Roseland Avenue in
Massillon, Ohio. Roseland is incumbered by a consensual mortgage
with Toorak Capital Partners, LLC. Michael L. Quinn Sr. Also claims
to hold a secured interest in Roseland. Debtor initiated an
adversary proceeding to determine the liens and the extent and
priority of the liens against Roseland. The parties to the
adversary proceeding stipulated to the validity and priority of the
liens on September 28, 2022.

Debtor's gross revenues for the tax years 2019 and 2020 were
$59,375 and $21,000, respectively. The Debtor's revenues for the
2021 tax year through August, the last full month prior to the
Petition Date, were $31,930.00. Post-filing, Debtor has collected
rents totaling $38,420 through July 31, 2022. Given Debtor's
intention to fund the Plan through the liquidation of all of its
real property, Debtor's past and future revenues will have no
discernable impact on the Plan.

Debtor's only remaining asset, Roseland, appears to have some
equity available for unsecured creditors. After consultation with
multiple realtors, Debtor intends to list Roseland in its current
condition for sale with an initial list price of $219,000. The
auditor value ascribed to Roseland is $52,200. Since Roseland is
subject to the secured claims of Toorak Capital Partners, LLC and
Michael Quinn, any sale by a chapter 7 trustee would require
payment of the secured claims. After payment of the secured claims
and administrative costs, there would not be sufficient funds to
pay a 100% dividend to unsecured creditors.

Class 1 consists of the Secured claim of Hackenberg. Class 1 is
impaired by this Plan. The claim of Hackenberg shall be satisfied
in full upon the Effective Date of the Plan through the transfer of
the Canton Real Estate to Hackenberg in full satisfaction of his
claim against the estate.

Class 2 consists of the Secured claim of Stark County Treasurer.
Class 2 is unimpaired by this plan. The claim of the Stark County
Treasurer shall be paid in full upon the Effective Date of the Plan
upon the transfer of the Canton Real Estate.

Class 4 consists of General unsecured claims. Class 4 is impaired
by this plan. The holder of a Class 4 claim shall be paid in full
within ninety days after the Effective Date of the Plan.

On the Effective Date of the Plan, the Debtor shall transfer its
interest in the Canton Real Estate to Hackenberg through a title
company which is mutually acceptable to each of the parties.
Hackenberg shall pay in full all real estate taxes due on the
Canton Real Estate, including the entire amount due the Stark
County Treasurer on account of its claim. Upon the transfer, the
Hackenberg claim shall be deemed satisfied in full and Hackenberg
shall have no further claim against the Debtor or Jeffrey Melton.

Prior to the Effective Date of the Plan, Debtor shall market and
seek to sell Roseland for the highest amount obtainable. Debtor
shall close on the sale of Roseland no later than sixty days after
the Effective Date. The Class 3 claimants shall be paid in full at
closing. Any net funds from the sale shall be escrowed by Roderick
Linton Belfance, and be distributed as soon as practicable to the
Class 4 claimants. In the event there are not sufficient funds
available to pay Class 4 claimants in full, which are estimated to
be $6,292.45, Jeffrey Melton shall make a cash contribution to
Debtor in an amount sufficient to permit a 100% distribution to
Class 4 claimants.

A full-text copy of the Amended Plan dated October 3, 2022, is
available at https://bit.ly/3REV9lK from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Attorney for the Debtor:

     Steven J. Heimberger, Esq.
     Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP
     50 S Main St 10th Floor
     Akron, OH 44308
     Phone: +1 330-434-3000
     Email: sheimberger@rlbllp.com

               About Business Credit Solutions of Ohio

Business Credit Solutions of Ohio, LLC filed a petition for Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No. 21-61251) on Sept. 26,
2021, listing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.
Judge Russ Kendig oversees the case.  Steven J. Heimberger, Esq.,
at Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


BUYK CORP: Auctioneers Can't Claim Premiums, Says US Trustee
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee is asking a New York bankruptcy judge
to deny the fee applications of two auctioneers retained to sell
the inventory of bankruptcy grocery delivery app Buyk Corp., saying
they are trying to collect unauthorized premiums on their sales.

William K. Harrington, the United States Trustee for Region 2,
submitted an objection to the applications for commissions and
buyer's premiums of (a) Michael Amodeo & Co., Inc.; and (b)
National Property Solutions, Inc.

On March 24, 2022, the Court entered an order authorizing the
Debtor to retain Amodeo to sell personal property, i.e., fixtures,
equipment, and
groceries (excluding perishable items), housed at two retail
locations.  The Amodeo Retention Order authorizes commissions of
15% upon a proper application with the Court; however, it does not
authorize a buyer's premium.

On March 25, 2022, the Court entered an order authorizing the
Debtor to retain NPS to sell personal property, i.e., equipment and
groceries
(excluding perishable items), housed at 27 retail locations, and
four warehouse locations.  Similar to the Amodeo Retention Order,
the NPS Retention Order does not authorize a buyer's premium.

"Simply put, Amodeo and NPS have failed to comply with the terms of
their respective retention orders which required, among other
things, compliance with Local Bankruptcy Rules 6004-1 and 6005-1
for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York concerning auctioneers.  Additionally, Amodeo and NPS
charged unauthorized buyer's premiums in connection with their
auction sales," the U.S. Trustee said in its objection to payment
of commissions and buyer's premiums.

                        About Buyk Corp.

Buyk Corp. is a retail grocery delivery service that was launched
in September 2021.  It operated a network of 39 stores in New York
and Chicago.  

Buyk filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case
No. 22-10328) on March 17, 2022, listing as much as $10 million in
both assets and liabilities.  CEO James Walker signed the
petition.

Judge Michael E. Wiles oversees the case.

Mark S. Lichtenstein, Esq., at Akerman, LLP and Dmitriy Goykhman,
CPA PC, serve as the Debtor's legal counsel and accountant,
respectively.


BVM THE BRIDGES: Wins Interim Cash Collateral Access
----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa
Division, authorized BVM The Bridges, LLC and BVM Coral Landing,
LLC to use cash collateral on an interim basis in accordance with
the budget.

The Debtor is permitted to use cash collateral to pay: (a) amounts
expressly authorized by the Court, including payments to the U.S.
Trustee for quarterly fees; (b) the current and necessary expenses
set forth in the budgets, plus an amount not be exceed 10% for each
line item; and (c) additional amounts as may be expressly approved
in writing by CPIF Lending, LLC and US Bank, National Association
and Pallardy, LLC (as to The Bridges only).

Each creditor or other party with a security interest or other
interest in the cash collateral will have a perfected post-petition
lien or interest against cash collateral to the same extent and
with the same validity and priority as its prepetition lien or
interest, without the need to file or execute any document as may
otherwise be required under applicable non bankruptcy law.

As adequate protection, the Debtors will provide the Secured
Creditors and Pallardy with a post-petition replacement lien or
interest in cash collateral equal in validity and dignity as it
existed pre-petition.

The Debtors will maintain insurance coverage for their property in
accordance with the obligations under the loan and security
documents with the Secured Creditors.

A continued preliminary hearing on the matter is scheduled for
November 30, 2022 at 11 a.m.

A copy of the order and the Debtors' three-month budgets is
available at https://bit.ly/3VcmkXR from PacerMonitor.com.

The Bridges projects $964,545 in total income and $942,071 in total
expenses for three months, from August to October.

Coral Landing projects $469,095 in total income and $506,099 in
total expenses for the same three-month period.

                   About BVM The Bridges, LLC

BVM The Bridges, LLC operates an 87-bed/69-unit assisted living
facility known as The Bridges Assisted Living & Memory Care and The
Claridge House at the Bridges located at 11202 Dewhurst Drive in
Riverview, Florida, since 2014. The Debtor's average census is 70
residents.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 22-00345) on January 28,
2022. In the petition signed by John Bartle, president, the Debtor
disclosed up to $10 million in assets and up to $50 million in
liabilities.

Judge Michael J. Williamson oversees the case.

Alberto F. Gomez, Jr., Esq., at Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel &
Burns, LLP is the Debtor's counsel.



CEREMONY SALON: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Oct 13
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of North
Carolina, Durham Division, authorized Ceremony Salon, LLC to use
cash collateral on an interim basis in accordance with the budget,
with a 10% variance, through the earliest of:

     (i) the entry of a final order authorizing the use of cash
collateral,

    (ii) the entry of a further interim order authorizing the use
of cash collateral,

   (iii) October 13, 2022,

    (iv) the entry of an order denying or modifying the use of cash
collateral, or

     (v) the occurrence of a Termination Event.

These events constitute "Events of Termination":

      a. The effective date of any confirmed Chapter 11 plan in the
proceeding;

      b. Conversion of the case to another Chapter of the
Bankruptcy Code or removal of the Debtor from possession;

      c. The entry of further Court orders regarding the subject
matter hereof;

      d. Dismissal of the proceeding; or

      e. Occurrence of an event of default that is not timely
cured.

      f. The Secured Parties expressly are reserved the right to
seek further adequate protection of their interests and to seek a
later determination that the provisions of this order do not
constitute adequate protection of its interests. The Secured
Parties expressly are reserved their rights to seek further relief
under 11 U.S.C. sections 361, 362, and 363. The Debtor expressly
reserves its rights to seek additional use of cash collateral
beyond the stated term of the Order.

The Debtor requires the use of cash collateral to pay its
operational needs including the cost of maintaining the business,
payment of adequate protection payments, and other normal expenses
incurred in the ordinary course of the Debtor's business and as a
result of the filing of the Chapter 11 proceeding.

On May 26, 2020, the Debtor and the U.S. Small Business
Administration entered into a loan and security agreement. The loan
was secured by a blanket lien on all the Debtor's tangible and
intangible personal property and perfected by UCC Financing
Statement 20200061464G filed with the North Carolina Secretary of
State. The Debtor is unsure what the balance of the loan is.

On June 4, 2021, the Debtor and Expansion Group entered into a loan
and security agreement. The loan was secured by a blanket lien on
all the Debtor's assets "now or hereafter acquired" and perfected
by UCC Financing Statement 20210084467F filed with the North
Carolina Secretary of State on June 24, 2021. The Debtor believes
the balance of the Expansion Group loan is approximately $33,950.

On June 23, 2021, the Debtor and Fox Capital Group entered into a
loan and security agreement. The loan was secured by a blanket lien
on all the Debtor's accounts "now or hereafter owned or acquired"
and perfected by UCC Financing Statement 20210095853G filed with
the North Carolina Secretary of State on July 16, 2021. The Debtor
believes the balance of the Fox loan is approximately $12,104.

On July 14, 2021, the Debtor and Fox Capital Group entered into a
loan and security agreement. The loan was secured by a blanket lien
on all the Debtor's "present and future accounts" and perfected by
UCC Financing Statement 20210110415J filed with the North Carolina
Secretary of State on August 13, 2021. The Debtor believes the
balance of this loan is approximately $11,716.

On July 16, 2021, the Debtor and DeltaBridge Funding entered into a
loan and security agreement. The loan was secured by a blanket lien
on all the Debtor's "assets, including proceeds and products" and
perfected by UCC Financing Statement 20210116647A filed with the
North Carolina Secretary of State on August 26, 2021. The Debtor
believes the balance of the Chrome Capital loan is approximately
$5,914.

On August 9, 2021, the Debtor and Chrome Capital Advance entered
into a loan and security agreement. The loan was secured by a
blanket lien on all the Debtor's "present and future accounts" and
perfected by UCC Financing Statement 20210173528B filed  with the
North Carolina Secretary of State on December 29, 2021. The Debtor
believes the balance of the Chrome Capital loan is approximately
$17,353.

On August 12, 2021, the Debtor and Capytal.com entered into a loan
and security agreement. The loan was secured by a blanket lien on
all the Debtor's future receivables and perfected by UCC Financing
Statement 20210123874A filed with the North Carolina Secretary of
State on September 13, 2021. The Debtor believes the balance of the
Capytal loan is approximately $4,320.

On August 25, 2021, the Debtor and Global Funding Experts entered
into a loan and security agreement. The loan was secured by a
blanket lien on all the Debtor's assets "now owned or thereafter
acquired" and perfected by UCC Financing Statement 20210154103M
filed with the North Carolina Secretary of State on November 15,
2021. The Debtor believes the balance of the Global Funding loan is
approximately $16,787.

On September 10, 2021, the Debtor and Green Grass Capital entered
into a loan and security agreement. The loan was secured by a
blanket lien on all the Debtor's assets "now owned or hereafter
acquired" and perfected by UCC Financing Statement 20220013755J
filed with the North Carolina Secretary of State on February 2,
2022. The Debtor believes the balance of the Green Grass loan is
approximately $3,636.

As adequate protection, the Secured Parties are granted a
post-petition replacement lien in the Debtor's post-petition
property of the same type which secured the indebtedness of the
Secured Party pre-petition.

The security interests and liens granted to the Secured Party: (i)
are and will be in addition to all security interests, liens and
rights of set-off existing in favor of the Secured Party on the
Petition Date, if any; and (ii) will secure the payment of the
indebtedness owing to the Secured Party in an amount equal to the
aggregate cash collateral used or consumed by the Debtor.

The Debtor will preserve, protect, maintain and adequately insure
all its assets and continue to operate in the ordinary course of
business.

As additional adequate protection, the Debtor will keep all of its
personal property insured for no less than the amounts of the
pre-petition insurance and maintain appropriate workers
compensation and general liability insurance. The Debtor will
timely pay all insurance premiums related to any and all of the
collateral securing the claims of the Secured Parties.

A further cash collateral hearing is scheduled for October 13 at
9:30 a.m.

A copy of the order and the Debtor's budget for the period from
August 9 to October 5, 2022, is available at https://bit.ly/3SMw8X3
from PacerMonitor.com.

The Debtor projects $20,822 in revenue and  $18,045 in total
expenses for the period.

                  About Ceremony Salon, LLC

Ceremony Salon, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 22-00492) on March 8,
2022. The case was transferred to the Middle District of North
Carolina (Bankr. M.D.N.C. Case No. 22-00492) on March 21, 2022.

In the petition signed by Rachel Lynn Radford, member-manager, the
Debtor disclosed up to $50,000 in assets and up to $500,000 in
liabilities.

Judge Lena Mansori James oversees the case.

Travis Sasser, Esq., at Sasser Law Firm is the Debtor's counsel.


CITY LIVING: Seeks to Hire Evans & Mullinix as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
City Living KC, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Missouri to employ Evans & Mullinix,
P.A. to represent the Debtor in its Chapter 11 proceedings.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Colin N. Gotham, Esq.  $300 per hour
     Paralegals             $125 per hour

The firm received a retainer in the amount of $9,262, plus the
filing fee of $1,738.

As disclosed in court filings, Evans & Mullinix and its members are
disinterested within the meaning of Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Colin N. Gotham, Esq.
     Evans & Mullinix, P.A.
     7225 Renner Road, Suite 200
     Shawnee, KS 66217
     Phone: (913) 962-8700
     Fax: (913) 962-8701
     Email: cgotham@emlawkc.com

                        About City Living KC

City Living KC, LLC, a real estate rental agency in Kansas City,
Mo., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. W.D. Mo. Case No. 22-41170) on Sept. 20, 2022, with up to
$10 million in assets and up to $1 million in liabilities. Quashena
Wallace, owner, signed the petition.

Judge Brian T. Fenimore oversees the case.

Colin Gotham, Esq., at Evans & Mullinix, P.A. is the Debtor's
counsel.


CONNECT TRUCKING: Fine-Tunes Plan Documents
-------------------------------------------
Connect Trucking LLC submitted a First Amended and Restated Chapter
11 Plan dated October 3, 2022.

The Plan classifies claims and interests in various classes
according to their right to priority of payments as provided in the
Bankruptcy Code. The Plan states whether each class of claims or
interests is impaired or unimpaired. The Plan provides the
treatment each class will receive under the Plan.

The Amended Plan does not alter the proposed treatment for
unsecured creditors and the equity holder:

     * Class 4 consists of General Unsecured Claims. This Class has
$184,634.81 total estimated amount of claims, which includes the
deficiencies from secured creditors and will increase from the
final deficiency from Bush Trucking and Leasing. This claimant
shall receive its contractual payment of $500.00. The payments
shall continue until the total amount paid in this class equals
$30,000.00.

     * Interest holders in Class 5 will maintain all stock.

The Plan will be funded by the proceeds from operation of the
Debtor's trucking business.

The Amended Chapter 11 Plan added the Proposed Budget of the Debtor
on a weekly basis:

     Gross Income for 1 Truck      1250
     Gasoline                      250
      Salary                              250
      Payment o Bush Leasing              537
      Unsecured Payments                  125
      Repair                              75
      Total Expenses                      1237

A full-text copy of the First Amended Plan dated October 3, 2022,
is available at https://bit.ly/3RLS1EJ from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Counsel to the Debtor:

     Steven L. Lefkovitz, Esq.
     Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz, PLLC
     618 Church Street, Suite 410
     Nashville, TN 37219
     Telephone: (615) 256-8300
     Facsimile: (615) 255-4516
     Email: slefkovitz@lefkovitz.com

                    About Connect Trucking

Connect Trucking, LLC sought protection for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 22-01713) on May
31, 2022, listing $50,000 in assets and $100,001 to $500,000 in
liabilities. Judge Marian F Harrison presides over the case.

Lefkovitz And Lefkovitz, PLLC, represents the Debtor.


DAYCO LLC: S&P Withdraws 'CCC' Issuer Credit Rating
---------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew all of its ratings on Dayco LLC,
including its 'CCC' issuer credit rating, at the company's request
following the close of its sale to a new financial sponsor.

At the time of the withdrawal, our outlook on Dayco was negative.

S&P Global Ratings withdrew all of its ratings on Dayco LLC at the
company's request following close of its sale to a new financial
sponsor. Dayco's debt was repaid at the close of the transaction.
S&P's outlook on the company was negative at the time of the
withdrawal.



DEL MONTE: S&P Affirms 'B' Rating on $600MM Sr. Secured Term Loan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B' issue-level rating on Del Monte
Foods Inc.'s $600 million senior secured term loan after the
company upsized its revolving credit facility to $625 million from
$450 million and extended the maturity to September 2027 from April
2026. The recovery rating remains '3' (50%-70%; rounded estimate:
50%).

The increase in the asset-based lending (ABL) revolving facility's
commitment raises the priority debt outstanding in Del Monte's
capital structure and reduces the net value available to term loan
creditors, resulting in a lower recovery percentage (from 55%). The
ratings are unchanged. S&P believes the incremental availability
under the ABL will support the company's seasonal working capital
buildup ahead of its packing season. It will also enable it to make
payments to parent Del Monte Pacific Ltd. for working capital
support and funds acquired for the acquisition of Kitchen Basics,
while maintaining its adequate liquidity position.

S&P said, "All of our other ratings on the company, including the
'B' issuer credit rating, are unchanged. The outlook is positive.
Pro forma for the acquisition and seasonal draw on the revolver, we
estimate Del Monte's leverage weakened to about 5x from 4x as of
the 12 months ended July 31, 2022. However, we expect the company
to deleverage over the next couple of quarters by paying down its
ABL revolver. We forecast Del Monte will generate positive free
operating cash flow in fiscal 2024 as a result of profit growth and
reduced working capital usage. Del Monte also announced it will
undertake a formal process for an IPO next year. Details of use of
proceeds are unclear, but it could be credit positive, assuming the
IPO is successful and the company allocates the proceeds to debt
repayment or improve liquidity."



DIAMOND SCAFFOLD: May Use Cash Collateral Thru Jan 2023
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama
authorized Diamond Scaffold Services, LLC to use cash collateral on
an interim basis in accordance with the budget through January 10,
2023.

The Debtor requires the use of cash collateral to pay its payroll,
payroll taxes, post-petition trade creditors and vendors, fuel and
transportation costs, professionals fees, and other operating
expenses necessary for the continued operation of the Debtor's
business and the management and preservation of the Debtor's assets
and properties.

Prior to June 2021, the Debtor owned scaffolding and leased it to
its customers. It now leases scaffolding from Sertant Capital, SMA
II LP I, LLC, Mazuma Capital, and First Guaranty Bank and subleases
that scaffolding to its customers.

Sertant, SMA, Mazuma, and First Guaranty Bank claim security
interests in the scaffolding and in the proceeds thereof.

Honest Funding, LLC; Cheetah Capital; Dynasty Capital 26, LLC;
Reserve Capital Management; Byrd Capital, LLC; Granite State
Services, LLC; Strategic Investments, LLC; LCF Group, Inc.; and
Imperial Funding -- which the Debtor calls "Cash Advance
Facilitators" -- may also claim to own or to have a security
interest in certain of Debtor's receivables.

Byrd Capital, LLC, Granite State Services, LLC, and Strategic
Investments, LLC are members of 3 Cajuns, LLC and consolidated
their claims against the Debtor into one promissory note in the
principal amount of $875,000 prior to the petition date.

The IRS, Alabama Department of Revenue, and the State of Texas
recorded tax liens against the Debtor prior to the Petition Date,
which may attach to the Debtor's pre-petition accounts
receivables.

The Louisiana Department of Revenue claims a statutory lien against
the Debtor's pre-petition receivables.

The IRS, the Alabama Department of Revenue, the Louisiana
Department of Revenue, the State of Texas, and the Funders are the
"Cash Collateral Claimants."

To provide adequate protection to those of the Equipment Lessors
and Cash Collateral Claimants that have ownership claims to or
valid liens on the Debtor's cash collateral, such Equipment Lessors
and Cash Collateral Claimants will have and are granted, effective
as of the date of the Interim Order, a post-petition security
interest and replacement lien on the Debtor's postpetition
receivables to the same extent, priority, and perfection status as
they have valid prepetition liens.

The Debtor will also make Adequate Protection Payment on a monthly
basis until the order expires or is modified by further Court
order. The monthly payments will be made on or before the 15th day
of each month, beginning on October 15, 2022, and continuing until
the Fourth Interim Cash Collateral Order expires or is modified by
further court order. Imperial Funding reserves all rights to
request a share of the Adequate Protection Payment, or any other
adequate protection to which it may be entitled.

The hearing on the matter is set for January 10, 2023 at 9:30 a.m.

A copy of the order and the Debtor's budget is available at
https://bit.ly/3SJfx6H from PacerMonitor.com.

The budget provides for total expenses, on a monthly basis, as
follows:

     $534,875 for October 2022;
     $586,036 for November 2022; and
     $505,036 for December 2022.

                About Diamond Scaffold Services

Diamond Scaffold Services LLC -- https://www.diamondscaffold.com/
-- is an authorized distributor of Ring-lock, Cup-lock, Shoring,
and Frame Scaffold. Diamond Scaffold Services, LLC, sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
S.D. Ala. Case No. 22-11208) on June 21, 2022.  In the petition
filed by Jewell Wayne Sumrall, as president, the Debtor estimated
assets between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities between
$10 million and $50 million.

Judge Jerry Oldshue oversees the case.

Alexandra K. Garrett, Esq., at Silver, Voit & Garrett, is the
Debtor's counsel. Jason R. Watkins is serving as special counsel,
representing the Debtor in various litigation.



DUNBAR PLAZA: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 4 disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Dunbar Plaza, Inc.
  
                      About Dunbar Plaza Inc.

Dunbar, W.Va.-based Dunbar Plaza, Inc. filed a petition for Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Case No. 21-20221) on Sept. 23,
2021, with as much as $10 million in both assets and liabilities.
Carl Higginbotham, president of Dunbar Plaza, signed the petition.


Judge B. Mckay Mignault oversees the case.  

Joseph W. Caldwell, Esq., at Caldwell & Riffee, PLLC is the
Debtor's lead bankruptcy counsel.  Matthew M. Johnson, Esq., a
practicing attorney in Charleston, W.Va., serves as Mr. Caldwell's
co-counsel.


EAGLE BEAR: Wants More Time for Chapter 11 Plan
-----------------------------------------------
Eagle Bear, Inc. is seeking more time to control its bankruptcy
while waiting for the outcome of its case against Blackfeet
Nation.

In its motion, the company asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Montana to extend the exclusivity period to file a
Chapter 11 plan to the date that is 21 days after entry of a final
order resolving the case, and to solicit acceptances for the plan
to Jan. 23, 2024.

In its case (Adversary Proceeding 22-04001), Eagle Bear seeks a
court declaration that the cancellation of its lease with Blackfeet
in 2008 is null and void.

Eagle Bear operates the Kampgrounds of America campground in East
Glacier, Mont., on property leased from Blackfeet. Blackfeet
blocked access to the campground following the cancellation,
depriving Eagle Bear of any revenue.

Eagle Bear's attorney, James Patten, Esq., at Patten, Peterman,
Bekkedahl & Green, PLLC, said the status of the lease is currently
an unresolved contingency whose outcome will dictate the nature of
the company's Chapter 11 plan.

If the court handling the case determines the lease was effectively
cancelled in 2008 and is not currently in effect, then Eagle Bear's
source of revenue is lost and the company will be forced to propose
a liquidating plan. On the other hand, if the court rules the lease
remains in effect, then the company can propose a plan
restructuring its debt while retaining its business operations,
according to Mr. Patten.

                         About Eagle Bear

Eagle Bear Inc. operates recreational vehicle parks and camping
ground resort. The company is based in St. Mary, Mont.

Eagle Bear filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Mont. Case No. 22-40035) on May
23, 2022, with up to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.
Susan Brooke, president of Eagle Bear, signed the petition.

Judge Benjamin P. Hursh oversees the case.

Patten, Peterman, Bekkedahl and Green, PLLC is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel while Crowley Fleck, PLLP and Johnson, Berg &
Saxby, PLLP serve as its special legal counsel.


ELITE HOME: Committee Wants Exclusivity Period Terminated
---------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Elite Home
Products, Inc. asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
New Jersey to terminate the period during which the company alone
can file a Chapter 11 plan.

Douglas Tabachnik, Esq., one of the attorneys representing the
committee, said Elite Homes' exclusive right to pursue a plan must
be terminated in light of its failure to file a disclosure
statement.

Elite Home filed its proposed Chapter 11 plan minutes before the
July 22 deadline. It did not file a disclosure statement detailing
the plan prior to the solicitation deadline, which expired on Sept.
20.

Mr. Tabachnik said the committee intends to file a plan of
liquidation that will be substantially similar to that of Elite
Home and that will allow the committee to appoint a liquidating
trustee.

"The committee seeks authorization to file its own plan of
liquidation in order to provide the court and parties in interest
with the option of confirming a plan that maximizes the value of
estate claims and provides for a fiduciary with both full standing
and without any hint or appearance of compromised loyalties," Mr.
Tabachnik said in court papers.

The hearing to consider the committee's request is scheduled for
Oct. 18.  

                     About Elite Home Products

Elite Home Products, Inc., a home textile company in Saddle Brook,
N.J., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. N.J. Case No. 22-12353) on March 24, 2022, with
$6,314,175 in assets and $11,104,637 in liabilities. Scott R.
Perretz, president of Elite Home Products, signed the petition.

The Debtor tapped Genova Burns, LLC as bankruptcy counsel; Winne
Banta Basralian and Kahn, P.C. as special counsel; Getzler Henrich
and Associates, LLC as financial advisor; and SAX, LLP as
accountant.


EMERALD HOLLOW: Court OKs Interim Cash Collateral Access
--------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North
Carolina, Statesville Division, authorized Emerald Hollow Mine, LLC
to use cash collateral on an interim basis in accordance with the
budget, with a 10% variance.

The Debtor is permitted to use cash collateral to pay operating
expenses.

As adequate protection, World Business Lenders, LLC and any junior
lienholders are granted a replacement security interest and lien
under section 361 of the Bankruptcy Code on all personal property
or collateral which secured the loan of WBL and any junior
lienholders as of the petition date to the extent and with the same
priority as the security interest and lien existed prior to the
petition date along with the proceeds and products thereof.

A copy of the order and the Debtor's five-week budget is available
at https://bit.ly/3MiQiWq from PacerMonitor.com.

The budget provides for total expenses, on a weekly basis, as
follows:

     $39,947 for Week 16;
     $25,947 for Week 17;
     $25,947 for Week 18;
     $25,947 for Week 19; and
     $25,947 for Week 20.

                      About Emerald Hollow Mine, LLC

Emerald Hollow Mine, LLC operates an Emerald Mine that is open to
the public for prospecting. The Debtor sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D.N.C. Case No.
22-50116) on May 16, 2022. In the petition filed by Jason Martin,
member manager, the Debtor disclosed up to $500,000 in assets and
up to $10 million in liabilities.

Judge Laura T. Beyer oversees the case.

John C. Woodman, Esq., at Essex Richards, PA is the Debtor's
counsel.


EMPOWER PAYMENTS: Moody's Assigns 'B3' CFR, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the existing B2 and Caa2
instrument ratings on the secured first and second lien credit
facilities, respectively, issued by RevSpring, Inc., including a
$35 million first lien revolver due 2024, $398.5 million first lien
term loan due 2025, and $120 million second lien term loan due
2026. Moody's also assigned a B3 corporate family rating and a
B3-PD probability of default rating to RevSpring, Inc.'s parent
Empower Payments Intermediate Holdings, Inc. ("RevSpring"), the
entity at which financials are reported and guarantor of RevSpring,
Inc's debt and withdrew the B3 CFR and B3-PD PDR at RevSpring, Inc.
The new outlook is stable.

Assignments:

Issuer: Empower Payments Intermediate Holdings, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B3

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B3-PD

Affirmations:

Issuer: RevSpring, Inc.

GTD Senior Secured First Lien Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed B2
(LGD3)

GTD Senior Secured Second Lien Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Caa2
(LGD5)

Withdrawals:

Issuer: RevSpring, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Withdrawn , previously rated B3

Probability of Default Rating, Withdrawn , previously rated B3-PD

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Empower Payments Intermediate Holdings, Inc.

Outlook, Assigned Stable

Issuer: RevSpring, Inc.

Outlook, Changed To No Outlook From Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

RevSpring's B3 CFR reflects the company's very high debt to EBITDA
leverage of 8.5x (adjusted to expense capitalized software costs)
for the twelve months ending June 30, 2022 ("LTM period") that
Moody's expects to gradually improve to below 8x during the next 12
months. The company has modest revenue scale of $247 million
(excluding pass-through postal revenue) and a narrow operating
scope as a provider of print and mail communications serving the US
healthcare and financial services industry. Moody's expects higher
input costs for labor and paper products to pressure margins, which
RevSpring is offsetting with price increases. However, it is
uncertain if the company will be able to increase prices enough in
2022 if costs continue to rise. Long term, demand for physical
print and mail services faces demand shifts towards digital
offerings that will require the company to continually invest in
its digital platform. Governance risk is considered high given
private equity ownership and the potential for acquisitions and
shareholder returns.

All financial metrics reflect Moody's standard adjustments.

Ratings support is provided by a high 90%+ customer retention
rates, reflecting the embedded nature of the company's services in
the revenue cycle and accounts receivable management and its scale
advantage in printing and postage, which allows the company to
print and mail at a lower cost than its customers could do in
house. About 40% of revenue comes from services other than physical
print & mail that are enabled by its core printing relationships,
mainly digital and payment services including data cleansing,
electronic signatures, analytics and payment gateways. There is
modest customer concentration with the top 10 customers accounting
for around 16% of LTM revenue.

Liquidity is adequate and is supported by Moody's view that recent
cash flow deficits are largely working capital driven, following a
year of low double digit revenue growth as well as one-time
severance costs. Moody's expects free cash flow to gradually
improve to about $10 million during the next 12 months supported by
pricing increases taken in mid-2022 to help offset higher costs for
labor and paper products. Higher interest rates will pressure cash
flow, however the risk of higher rates is partially mitigated by a
4% cap on LIBOR that the company has in place for $375 million of
notional debt through June 2024. Support also comes from the
company's undrawn $35 million revolving credit facility due 2024
and $26.7 million of cash on hand as of June 30, 2022. The revolver
has a springing first lien net leverage ratio test of 7.5x with no
step downs. As of 30 June 2022, the first lien leverage covenant
was tested at 4.06 times, leaving ample coverage.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that RevSpring will
maintain adequate liquidity while reducing leverage to below 8x
from a combination of revenue growth and debt repayment and
break-even free cash flow over the next 12 months.

The individual debt instrument ratings issued by RevSpring, Inc.,
guaranteed by Empower Payment Intermediate Holdings, Inc., are
based on the company's probability of default, as reflected in the
B3-PD, and the Loss Given Default expectations of the individual
debt instruments. The B2 rating and LGD3 assessment on the first
lien senior secured facilities, including the $35 million revolver
due 2024 and $398.5 million term loan due 2025, reflect their
senior position in the capital structure and loss absorption
support provided by the $120 million second lien term loan due 2026
that is rated Caa2 with an LGD5 assessment.

Moody's has decided to withdraw the B3 CFR and B3-PD PDR on
RevSpring for its own business reasons.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The rating could be upgraded if: i) Moody's expects financial
policies supportive of debt to EBITDA being sustained at or below
6x and free cash flow to debt above 5%; ii) RevSpring demonstrates
sustained revenue and earnings growth such that its size increases
significantly; and iii) Moody's expects an improved liquidity
profile will be maintained.

The ratings could be downgraded if: i) operating performance
deteriorates including declining EBITA margins, higher customer
churn, or if leverage were to increase from current levels; ii) a
deterioration in liquidity, including negative free cash flow; and
iii) debt funded dividends or acquisitions.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Services  published in November 2021.

RevSpring, controlled by affiliates of GTCR and based in Nashville,
Tennessee, provides printing and mailing of customer invoices and
related information services to health care, revenue cycle
management and accounts receivable management organizations in the
US. Revenue for the twelve months ended June 30, 2022 (excluding
pass through postage costs) was $247 million.


ENERFLEX LTD: Moody's Assigns First Time 'B1' Corp. Family Rating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B1 corporate family rating,
B1-PD probability of default rating, a B2 rating to the proposed
$625 million first lien last out secured notes due 2027 and a
speculative grade liquidity rating of SGL-3 to Enerflex Ltd.
(Enerflex). The outlook is positive.  This is the first time
Moody's has rated Enerflex.

Proceeds from the notes issuance will be used to refinance existing
debt at both Enerflex and Exterran Energy Solutions, L.P.
(Exterran, B1 positive) in connection with the business combination
of both companies in an all-share transaction.

Assignments:

Issuer: Enerflex Ltd.

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B1

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B1-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Assigned SGL-3

Senior Secured First Lien Regular Bond/Debenture , Assigned B2
(LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Enerflex Ltd.

  Outlook, Assigned Positive

RATINGS RATIONALE

On a pro-forma basis for the acquisition of Exterran, Enerflex's
rating benefits from: (1) the maintenance of a conservative
financial policy, including Moody's forecast for debt to EBITDA to
be under 3x by year end 2024; (2) recurring revenue streams,
including the high-margin rental business with a significant
contribution from multi-year, fee-based contracts; (3)
international geographic presence and vertical integration
providing good revenue diversification and enhancing competitive
capabilities; and (4) good liquidity.

Constraints include: (1) execution risks associated with the
integration of Exterran; (2) inherent industry cyclicality exposing
the company to pricing pressures on shorter-term contract renewals
and periods of lower capital investment by industry players; (3)
high capital intensity tied to large infrastructure projects
weighing on free cash flow; and (4) exposure to geo-political and
emerging market risks.

Enerflex's proposed $625 million first lien last out senior secured
notes (due 2027) are rated B2, one notch below the corporate family
rating, reflecting their junior position relative to the sizeable
$700 million first lien first out secured revolver and $150 million
Term Loan A (both due 2025) ranking ahead of them.

Enerflex's liquidity is adequate (SGL-3). Moody's estimates
pro-forma sources as of Q2-22 total about $495 million, consisting
of cash on hand of $50 million at transaction close, around $415
million available under the $700 million revolver expiring 2025
(comprised of drawings of about $160 million and letters of credit
totaling nearly $130 million) and Moody's forecast for positive
free cash flow of around $30 million through year end 2023. The
Term Loan A amortizes by $10 million per quarter, beginning at the
end of Q3-23. The company's secured revolver is subject to interest
and leverage maintenance covenants, including net debt to EBITDA
below 4.5x, stepping down to 4x as of Q4-23. Moody's expects the
company to remain in compliance with all covenants. Enerflex has
some flexibility to raise alternate source of liquidity through
asset sales.

Enerflex's governance issuer profile score (IPS, G-3) is moderately
negative. Governance risks are linked to financial policy with some
risk related to leverage and potential future dividends, but
mitigated by the company's diversified public ownership, low target
leverage and Moody's expectation of a conservative M&A strategy
post the integration of Exterran.

The positive outlook reflects Moody's expectation that Enerflex
with generate positive free cash flow and prioritizing debt
reduction such that debt to EBITDA declines to under 3x by year end
2024.  

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be upgraded if Enerflex establishes a strong
execution and financial policy track record and keeps Moody's
adjusted debt to EBITDA under 3x, maintains positive free cash flow
and a very good liquidity profile.

The ratings could be downgraded if debt to EBITDA is sustained
above 4.5x, there is sustained negative free cash flow or financial
policies become more aggressive.  

Headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, Enerflex primarily provides
infrastructure and energy transition solutions to the natural gas
production industry. The company is publicly listed on the TSX.
During the last twelve months ended June 2022, the combined
operations of Enerflex and Exterran generated $1.7 billion in
revenues.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Oilfield
Services published in August 2021.


EQM MIDSTREAM: Moody's Affirms Ba3 CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service changed EQM Midstream Partners, LP's
outlook to stable from negative. Concurrently, Moody's also
affirmed EQM's Ba3 Corporate Family Rating.

"While MVP completion uncertainty continues to remain a drag on
EQM's credit profile, cash flow from EQM's base business continues
to remain strong and its anchor shipper EQT's credit profile has
substantially improved," commented Sreedhar Kona, Moody's senior
analyst. "EQM's debt leverage mitigation strategy to manage through
MVP's uncertainty and its resolution of contractual and legal
disputes with EQT support its stable outlook."

Affirmations:

Issuer: EQM Midstream Partners, LP

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba3

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba3-PD

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture,
Affirmed Ba3 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: EQM Midstream Partners, LP

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

EQM's change in outlook to stable reflects the company's continued
strong operating performance in its base business and improvement
in its shipper quality in light of strong natural gas fundamentals.
The outlook change is also precipitated by Moody's expectation that
EQM can likely maintain its debt leverage at levels consistent with
its rating regardless of MVP's completion outcome.

EQM's Ba3 CFR reflects its substantial asset and cash flow profile
that provides the company with the ability to maintain its
financial leverage even without the contribution of Mountain Valley
Pipeline's (MVP) cash flow. EQM is supported by its close proximity
to high production volumes in the Marcellus Shale and the critical
nature of its pipelines for moving natural gas within the region to
long haul pipelines. In early 2020, EQM renegotiated the majority
of its Pennsylvania and West Virginia gathering contracts with its
anchor shipper EQT Corporation to enter into a new 15-year gas
gathering agreement with longer-term and higher minimum volume
commitments (MVCs). Even without MVP's completion the contract
provides for 3 Bcf per day of MVC to EQM. With over 60% of EQM's
2021 revenues derived from EQT, EQM's counterparty concentration
risk benefits from EQT's improving credit profile.

MVP's full in-service date has been delayed into the second half of
2023 and the total project budget has been increased to $6.6
billion. This adversely effects EQM's credit metrics, at least
through 2023, with higher debt-funded MVP capital spending and
further delay in MVP's cash flow generation. However, the potential
rise in leverage is not expected to be sufficient to pressure the
Ba3 rating. Whereas if MVP were to be completed, the additional
cash flow and full realization of benefits to credit metrics are
deferred in 2024.

EQM will have adequate liquidity, as reflected in its SGL-3 rating.
As of June 30, 2022, the company had $91 million of cash and
approximately $1.8 billion of availability under its $2.16 billion
unsecured revolving credit facility. A portion of the revolver
commitments expire in October 2023, with the remaining $1.55
billion maturing in April 2025. EQM's capital spending through 2022
will include some capital contributions dedicated to its MVP
project (as the bulk of the remaining MVP capital spending is now
likely to be incurred in 2023) and other growth projects. EQM will
fund its liquidity needs through 2023 through operating cash flow
and revolver draws. There is one financial covenant governing the
credit facility -- a maximum consolidated Debt/EBITDA ratio of
5.5x, except as of the MVP Mobilization Effective Date, the maximum
consolidated Debt/EBITDA permitted for that quarter and the
subsequent three quarters will be 5.85x. Moody's expects EQM to
remain in compliance with its covenant through 2023. EQM's next
maturity is a $99 million unsecured notes due in 2023 and $300
million unsecured notes due in 2024.

EQM's unsecured credit facility and its $6.5 billion of senior
unsecured notes with staggered maturities are pari passu.
Accordingly, the senior notes are rated Ba3, the same as the CFR.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

EQM's ratings could be downgraded if MVP's budget continues to rise
and if EQM's debt leverage approaches 6x. EQM's ratings could also
be downgraded if its operating performance significantly
deteriorated or if its counterparty credit risk were to
substantially rise.

An upgrade of EQM is unlikely given MVP's cost and completion
uncertainty. EQM's ratings could be considered for an upgrade if
MVP is completed and the project's cash flow strengthens EQM's
standalone credit profile and the company's Debt/EBITDA approaches
5x.

EQM Midstream Partners, LP is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary
of Equitrans Midstream Corporation that owns and operates
interstate pipelines, gathering lines and water assets primarily
serving Marcellus Shale production.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Midstream
Energy published in February 2022.


FAIRPORT BAPTIST: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Dec 16
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of New York
authorized Fairport Baptist Homes and its debtor-affiliates to
continue using cash collateral on a final basis pursuant to its
agreement with Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC, assignee of
Capmark Finance, Inc.

The Debtor is permitted to use cash collateral through December 16,
2022, under the terms and conditions of the Cash Collateral Order.

As previously reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, the Loan
Documents are each valid and enforceable against the Debtor, and
the Debtor does not possess and agrees not to assert any claim (as
such term is defined in section 101(5) of the Bankruptcy Code),
counterclaim, setoff or defense of any kind, nature or description
which would in any way affect the validity or enforceability of the
Loan Documents.

As of the Petition Date, the Prepetition Obligations constitute
legal, valid and binding obligations of the Debtor.

As of the Petition Date, the approximate indebtedness owed from the
Debtor to the Lender was $6,369,443.

A copy of the order and the Debtor's budget is available at
https://bit.ly/3SOzbya from PacerMonitor.com.

The budget provides for total disbursements, on a weekly basis, as
follows:

     $444,300 for the week beginning October 10, 2022;
     $190,800 for the week beginning October 17, 2022;
     $331,800 for the week beginning October 24, 2022; and
     $170,800 for the week beginning October 31, 2022.

                   About Fairport Baptist Homes

Fairport Baptist Homes and affiliates operate skilled nursing care
facilities. The Debtors sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 22-20220) on May 6,
2022. In the petition signed by Thomas H. Poelma, president, the
Debtors disclosed up to $10 million in assets and up to $50 million
in liabilities.

Judge Paul R. Warren oversees the case.

John A. Mueller, Esq., at Lippes Mathias LLP is the Debtors'
counsel.



FIRST FRUITS: Case Summary & Eight Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: First Fruits Business Ministry, LLC
        310 Turkey Pointe Circle
        Columbia, SC 29223

Business Description: First Fruits is a privately held company
                      which focuses on health/wellness and fitness
                      through patented and proprietary products
                      that are "safe with no negative side
                      effects", as well as being all-natural and
                      plant-based.  Its patents and products focus
                      on losing body fat and building lean muscle.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 7, 2022

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of South Carolina

Case No.: 22-02747

Judge: Hon. David R. Duncan

Debtor's Counsel: Jane H. Downey, Esq.
                  MOORE BRADLEY MYERS LAW FIRM, P.A.
                  PO Box 5709
                  1700 Sunset Boulevard
                  West Columbia, SC 29171
                  Tel: (803) 454-1983
                  Fax: (803) 791-8410
                  E-mail: jane@mbmlawsc.com

Total Assets as of July 31, 2022: $23,348,908

Total Liabilities as of July 31, 2022: $1,628,225

The petition was signed by Roger Catarino as CEO.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/N7ZNXNY/First_Fruits_Business_Ministry__scbke-22-02747__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

List of Debtor's Eight Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Bank Direct                       Insurance              $1,509
PO Box 660448
Dallas, TX
75266-0448

2. Fred Fischer                                            $91,225
125 Cuello Court,
Unit 102
Ponte Vedra Beach,
FL 32082

3. James Doroshow                    Attorneys             $55,000
Fox Rothschild                         Fees
10250 Constellation
Blvd. Ste. 900
Los Angeles, CA 90067

4. Knobbe Martens                    Judgment             $711,120
Olson & Bear, LLP                 in Richland Co.
1925 Century Park
East, Ste. 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067

5. Ross Harrison                                          $335,000
775 S. 600 West
Orem, UT 84058

6. Total Transportation Network      Current                $3,600
540 W. Frontage                      Invoice/
Road #3300                           Shipping
Northfield, IL 60093                 Services

7. Tripharma, LLC                   Judgment            $4,659,990
c/o Reid Winthrop
120 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660

8. Woods Rogers PLC                Attorney's               $4,450
123 E. Main Street,                   Fees
5th Floor
Charlottesville, VA 22902


FOX SUBACUTE: Amends Unsecured Claims Pay Details
-------------------------------------------------
Fox Subacute at Mechanicsburg, LLC ("Mechanicsburg")and Fox
Subacute at South Philadelphia, LLC ("South Philadelphia")
(individually a "Debtor" and collectively the "Debtors" or "Fox
Subacute") submitted an Amended Disclosure Statement in support of
the Joint Plan of Reorganization dated October 3, 2022.

The Debtors are also obligated to PeoplesBank based upon a
guarantee of the loan by PeoplesBank to FSA Realty Associates (the
"FSA Loan"). This debt is approximately $6,900,000.00 as of the
Petition Date. While this debt is unsecured as to the Debtors'
Assets, this Claim will not be paid as part of this Plan.

The Debtor scheduled unsecured Claims as owed by Mechanicsburg
totaling approximately $9,400,000.00. Included in this amount is
the unsecured Claim of PeoplesBank of approximately $6,900,000.00
for the FSA Loan. The Debtor set forth the Claim as contingent and
is not being paid as a Class 5A or Class 5B Claim under this Plan.

The Classes 5A and 5B general unsecured creditors include all
creditors not otherwise classified under the Plan. These Claims
include all such creditors notwithstanding the nature of the
categorization of any Claim by a creditor.

Beginning 6 months after the Effective Date, general unsecured
creditors will receive 20% of each allowed Class 5A and 5B Claims,
payable in 3 equal annual installments of 6.6% each. If either of
the Debtors desires to sell any or all Assets, an appropriate
Motion may be filed in the Court.

Each Debtor will continue to operate its Skilled Nursing Facility.
Each Debtor has instituted such cost cutting measures as may be
possible. Each Debtor believes that its cash flow has improved
during the course of the Cases.

It is believed that these cash flow projections set forth that the
Debtors can fund its operations as well as fund the payments under
the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated October
3, 2022, is available at https://bit.ly/3VaEwBn from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtor:

     Robert E. Chernicoff, Esq.
     CUNNINGHAM, CHERNICOFF & WARSHAWSKY, P.C.
     2320 North Second Street, P.O. Box 60457
     Harrisburg, PA 17106-0457
     Tel: (717) 238-6570

          About Fox Subacute at Mechanicsburg, LLC

Fox Subacute At Mechanicsburg, LLC is a skilled nursing facility in
Pennsylvania that specializes in pulmonary, neurological, and
rehabilitative care for patients with degenerative neurological and
neuromuscular disease; and pulmonary care and ventilator
requirements with an emphasis on vent weaning.  Its facilities
are located in Plymouth Meeting, Warrington, Mechanicsburg and
Philadelphia, Pa., and are licensed by the PA Department of
Health.

On Nov. 1, 2019, Fox Subacute at Mechanicsburg and its affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Lead Case No.
19-04714). Fox Subacute at Mechanicsburg was estimated to have $1
million to $10 million in assets and liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.

Judge Henry W. Van Eck oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Cunningham, Chernicoff & Warshawsky, P.C. as
their legal counsel, Kennedy P.C. as special counsel, Isdaner &
Company, LLC as accountant, and Three Twenty-One Capital Partners,
LLC as investment banker.   

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Dec. 11, 2019.  The committee is
represented by Flaster/Greenberg P.C.


FREE SPEECH: Bankruptcy Exposes Alex Jones Web of Friends, Family
-----------------------------------------------------------------
James Nani of Bloomberg Law reports that Far-right conspiracist
Alex Jones is facing heightened scrutiny as the bankruptcy of his
Infowars parent company reveals a complicated web of corporate
entities tied to his family and associates.

Jones' parents and sister control companies that are now looking to
be paid as creditors of the bankrupt debtor, Free Speech Systems
LLC. Other companies run by his personal trainer and an Infowars
contributor also have supplier contracts with Free Speech that will
be probed during the Chapter 11 case.

Jones and his company now owe about $50 million in defamation
judgment -- and possibly more in the future -- to Sandy Hook
Elementary School shooting victim families for his lies that the
2012 shooting was a hoax.

Those families, as unsecured creditors, have led the call to
investigate whether Free Speech, through his family and friends,
has established corporate structures that allow him to protect
assets that could otherwise be used to pay the defamation
judgment.

A judge has ordered the bankruptcy trustee in the case to
investigate the intra-family and other dealings that could hurt
creditor payout. Future court rulings could wreak havoc on Jones'
quest to use bankruptcy to limit his liabilities.

The investigation "is a major inflection point in this bankruptcy
case that will put the debtor on its heels and highlights that the
Court is taking seriously the concerns of creditors," said Nicholas
Koffroth, a bankruptcy attorney with Fox Rothschild LLP.

Findings of fraud, dishonesty, incompetence, or gross mismanagement
could result in removal of Jones’ control over the assets, a
liquidation order, or dismissal of the bankruptcy case, said Donald
L. Swanson, a bankruptcy attorney and shareholder at Koley Jessen.

Small businesses' transactions and dealings with close insiders
aren’t unusual. But Free Speech's finances should be probed given
the concerns over a "lack of candor" by some of its former
advisers, Texas bankruptcy Judge Christopher M. Lopez said last
week, while directing Subchapter V trustee Melissa Haselden to
investigate the debtor.

Jones, who via a separate entity invited a probe into Free Speech's
finances before Lopez ordered the investigation, said in a
statement to Bloomberg Law that claims of “side deals” with
certain companies are "100% false."

"I put Free Speech Systems into bankruptcy so that the truth of our
financial situation could be known to the courts and to the people
of America," Jones said.  "The establishment press and the
plaintiff’s lawyers have continued to systematically lie at every
point about the amount of money we have and our business
practices."

All in the Family

One of the key relationships that Haselden will look into is Free
Speech's relationship with PQPR Holdings Limited LLC, a dietary
supplements procurer that’s owned by Jones' and his parents,
David Jones and Carol Jones, through affiliated corporate entities,
according to court filings.

Free Speech says it owes about $54 million in purportedly secured
debt to PQPR. The dietary supplements and other products PQPR buys
from suppliers are then sold to Free Speech to sell on the Infowars
website.

If that debt is found to be valid and secured, PQPR would be among
the first in line to get paid under a bankruptcy plan—before the
Sandy Hook families.

Jones' parents could not be reached for comment.

"Just because the debtor labels the debt as secured does not mean
that it is in fact," said Melanie Cyganowski, a former bankruptcy
judge now with the law firm Otterbourg PC.

MRJR Holdings LLC, a company controlled by Jones' sister, Marleigh
Jones Rivera, is also an unsecured creditor listed in the case.

Free Speech listed in court filings $84,000 in claims to
Nevada-based MRJR. Before bankruptcy, Free Speech also paid roughly
$240,000 to MRJR for consulting services, according to court
records.

Rivera could not be reached for comment.

Selling Dietary Supplements

Anthony Gucciardi, a former contributor to Infowars, also features
in the case.

Gucciardi owns a company, Austin-based Auriam Services LLC, that
facilitates the credit card services Free Speech uses on its
websites, Auriam attorney Lynn Butler of Husch Blackwell LLP told
Bloomberg Law.

Free Speech has paid the processor a fee of at least 4% of the
total amount of all credit card charges processed under the
agreement, as well as reimbursement of all costs incurred,
according to court records.

The trustee will investigate Free Speech's agreement with a credit
card processor, whose name has been redacted in financial
disclosures. But the processor’s address uses the same PO Box of
PQPR.

"Mr. Gucciardi has been in the health supplement business for
years," Butler wrote in an email. "He has brokered arrangements
with companies that he understands then sold to FSS but those were
part of his normal business. There is not any informal relationship
with FSS or any Alex Jones-related businesses other than Auriam's
financial services contract with FSS."

Free Speech's ties extend to Jones' personal trainer.  Patrick
Riley -- who has said he trained Jones and Jones' father and worked
for Free Speech -- recently began operating Blue Asension Logistics
LLC to take on fulfillment logistics work for Free Speech. In
August, Jones agreed to send Blue Asension $400,000 to clear sales
order backlogs, Riley said.

The bankruptcy judge also charged Haselden with investigating
roughly $62 million withdrawn by Free Speech's "members," according
to disclosures. The company’s only member is Jones.

"If proven, this could bring significant monies into the bankruptcy
for distribution to the non-insider creditors," Cyganowski said.

Creditors have questioned Free Speech over reports that Jones has
recently collected millions of dollars in cryptocurrency donations.
Jones said in Connecticut state court recently that he's received
about $9 million worth of cryptocurrency to his personal
cryptocurrency wallet through donations solicited from Infowars.

All but about $60,000 worth of that cryptocurrency has gone back
into Free Speech to shore up the business, Jones said.

'Potentially Incurable'

The court hasn't found any wrongdoing in Free Speech's connections
or transactions. But the sheer amount of "potentially incurable
conflicts of interest" makes them subject to scrutiny, said Alan
Rosenberg of Markowitz Ringel Trusty & Hartog PA.

The law doesn't prevent a debtor from engaging in business with
friends or family, but it's "unrealistic" to expect that the debtor
will impartially investigate potential wrongdoing within its own
familial and social circle, Rosenberg said.

"If there is a legal basis to avoid PQPR's claim, can we really
expect Alex Jones/Free Speech systems to pursue it?" Rosenberg
said.  "Of course not – and that is not specific to Alex Jones or
Free Speech Systems.  These kinds of conflicts arise in many
cases."

                  About Free Speech Systems

Free Speech Systems LLC is a broadcast media production and
distribution company that provides broadcasting aural programs by
radio to the public.  Free Speech Systems is a family-run business
founded by Alex Jones.

FSS is presently engaged in the business of producing and
syndicating Jones' radio and video talk shows and selling products
targeted to Jones' loyal fan base via the Internet.  Today, FSS
produces Alex Jones' syndicated news/talk show (The Alex Jones
Show) from Austin, Texas, which airs via the Genesis Communications
Network on over 100 radio stations across the United States and via
the internet through websites including Infowars.com.

Due to the content of Alex Jones' shows, Jones and FSS have faced
an all-out ban of Infowars from mainstream online spaces.  Shunning
from financial institutions and banning Jones and FSS from major
tech companies began in 2018.

Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones has been sued by victims' family
members over Jones' lies that the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School
shooting was a hoax.

Jones' InfoW LLC and affiliates, IWHealth, LLC and Prison Planet
TV, LLC, filed petitions under Chapter 11, Subchapter V of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Lead Case No. 22-60020) on April
18, 2022.

The Debtors agreed to the dismissal of the Chapter 11 cases in June
2022 after the Sandy Hook victim families dismissed the three
bankrupt companies from their lawsuits.

Free Speech Systems filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Case No. 22-60043) on July 29, 2022.  In the petition filed by W.
Marc Schwartz, as chief restructuring officer, the Debtor reported
assets and liabilities between $50 million and $100 million.

Melissa A Haselden has been appointed as Subchapter V trustee.

Raymond William Battaglia, of Law Offices of Ray Battaglia, PLLC,
is the Debtor's counsel.


FRONT SIGHT: Files Amended Plan; Confirmation Hearing Nov. 18
-------------------------------------------------------------
Front Sight Management LLC, submitted a Second Amended Disclosure
Statement describing Second Amended Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization dated October 3, 2022.

The Plan described in this Disclosure Statement is a reorganizing
plan. The Plan described in this Disclosure Statement provides for
the Debtor's emergence from its chapter 11 bankruptcy as the
"Reorganized Debtor", which the Debtor anticipates will occur in
November 2022. Under the Plan, the Debtor will satisfy its debt and
other claims and implement a recapitalization with approximately
$24.775 million of new capital.

After confirmation of the Plan, the Reorganized Debtor will
continue operating its business as a world class firearms training
center located in Nye County, Nevada. Through its chapter 11
reorganization and the Plan, the Debtor is terminating all of its
existing memberships and offering new memberships

The Plan provides for a recapitalization as follows: in exchange
for 100% of the new equity interests to be issued on the Effective
Date, Nevada PF, LLC (the "New Equity Investor"), an affiliate of
the Debtor's post-petition lender FS DIP, LLC ("FS DIP"), or a
designee of Nevada PF will (a) contribute $19.575 million in cash
to fund the Plan, and (b) cause FS DIP's approximately $5.2 million
secured claim to be contributed to the estate as partial
consideration for the new equity interests, for total consideration
of at least $24.775 million (the "New Value Contribution").

Under the Plan, the Debtor will satisfy its debt and other claims
as set forth in Article. The $19.575 million cash contribution
("Cash Contribution") will be used to, among other things, fund
certain Plan payments on or around the Effective Date,  provide
reserves for certain disputed claims and provide the Reorganized
Debtor with sufficient working capital.

Class 1 consists of the Secured Claim of Las Vegas Development
Fund, LLC ("LVDF"). The Debtor filed an objection to Proof of Claim
No. 284-1 filed by LVDF. Pending resolution of the Debtor's
objection to LVDF's claim and the Debtor's affirmative claims
against LVDF and prior to the Effective Date, $11,805,706.01 of the
Cash Contribution shall be placed int a reserve account maintained
by Stretto for LVDF's allowed claim. If LVDF's allowed claim is
less than the reserve amount, any surplus shall revert to the
Reorganized Debtor.      

Class 2 consists of the Secured claim of Michael Meacher dba
Bankgroup Financial Services. Pending resolution of the Debtor's
complaint against Meacher and prior to the effective date, $3.3
million of the cash contribution shall be placed into a reserve
account maintained by Stretto for purposes of satisfying any
allowed claim held by Meacher. If any allowed claim is less than
the reserve amount of $3.3 million, any surplus shall revert to the
Reorganized Debtor.

Class 6 consists of General Unsecured Claims. Estimated at
approximately $10 million to $30 million. The Debtor disputes the
validity of many of the claims asserted by members and intends on
objecting to such claims. Prior to the effective date, $3 million
of the cash contribution shall be placed into reserve account
maintained by Stretto for allowed general unsecured claims. Any
fees relating to objections to Class 6 Claims after the effective
date will be paid from this reserve. 

The Plan will be funded by the Exit Financing in the aggregate
amount of the $19.575 million Cash Contribution and the
contribution or payment of FS DIP's secured claim of approximately
$5.2 million by the New Equity Investor. Of this amount, the
Reorganized Debtor anticipates that it will require approximately
$700,000 for working capital to meet the Debtor's operating needs.

The hearing where the Bankruptcy Court will determine whether or
not to confirm the Plan (the "Confirmation Hearing") will take
place on November 18, 2022 at 9:30 a.m.

Ballots must be received by November 4, 2022 or it will not be
counted. Objections to the Confirmation of the Plan must be filed
and served on November 4, 2022.

A copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement dated October 3,
2022, is available at https://bit.ly/3Taf5y9 from Stretto, the
claims agent.

Attorneys for the Chapter 11 Debtor and Plan Proponent:

     Steven T. Gubner, Esq.
     Susan K. Seflin, Esq.
     Jessica S. Wellington, Esq.
     BG LAW LLP
     300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550
     Las Vegas, NV 89101
     Telephone: (702) 835-0800
     Facsimile: (866) 995-0215
     E-mail: sgubner@bg.law
             sseflin@bg.law
             jwellington@bg.law

            About Front Sight Management

Front Sight Management LLC specializes in providing courses in gun
training, self-defense martial arts training, and personal safety
-- with firearms or without.

Front Sight filed a voluntary petition for under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 22-11824) on May 24,
2022. In the petition signed by Ignatius Piazza, manager, the
Debtor disclosed up to $50 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge August B. Landis oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Steven T. Gubner, Esq., at BG Law LLP as
bankruptcy counsel; Greenberg Traurig, LLP as special counsel;
Province, LLC as financial advisor; and Lucas Horsfall as
accountant. Stretto, Inc. is the claims, noticing and solicitation
agent.

FS DIP, LLC, as DIP agent, is represented by Samuel A. Schwartz,
Esq., and Bryan A. Lindsey, Esq., at Schwartz Law, PLLC.


GIRARDI & KEESE: Erika Asks Judge to Return Diamond Earrings
------------------------------------------------------------
Meghann Cuniff of Law & Crime reports that Real Housewives of
Beverly Hills star Erika Jayne is asking a federal judge to stop
her from having to relinquish a pair of high-end diamond stud
earrings that a bankruptcy trustee says should be sold to help pay
the near-$500 million debt for her disgraced husband's law firm.

The earrings already are out of Jayne's possession: A U.S.
Bankruptcy Court judge ordered her to turn them over last July
2022, and the trustee has been storing them in a bank safety
deposit for months.

Jayne's lawyer is appealing the turnover order in U.S. District
Court, and he filed a brief late Thursday, September 27, 2022, that
the trustee can't lawfully claim the earrings because Tom Girardi
gave them to his Jayne in 2007 and any current claim "is
time-barred by every imaginable statute of limitations" as well as
California law.

Jayne, who filed for divorce in November 2020, was gifted the
seven-carat earrings in 2007 by Girardi after a burglar stole a
similar pair of diamond earrings he’d given her as a birthday or
anniversary gift a couple years earlier. But the bankruptcy trustee
for the firm Girardi controlled for years, Girardi Keese LLP, found
records showing the now-disbarred megalawyer paid $750,000 in firm
money for the earrings, and she wants them sold, with all money
going to the firm's estate.

Jayne's appeal of U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Barry Russell's July 11,
2022 turnover order comes as the trustee, Elissa Miller, is
preparing to auction the jewelry. On Tuesday, September 25, 2022,
Russell granted her request to hire an auctioneer to facilitate the
sale. The auction is to include other jewelry given to the trustee
by a Girardi associate last August 2022, described in court
documents as a small Tiffany heart-shaped diamond necklace, a small
Cartier diamond necklace, a Bulgari pearl and diamond necklace and
diamond stud earrings approximately 1.75 carats each, worth between
$10,000 and $15,000. The source of the jewelry is identified by the
trustee only as "a former 'friend'" of Girardi's, but the
relinquishment occurred the same time Tricia A. Bigelow, a retired
state appellate court justice who had a four-year romance with
Girardi, was handing over to Miller property he’d given her that
turned out to be paid for with firm money.

The company hired to run it, John Moran & Associates, has already
facilitated auctions regarding Girardi’s estate, most recently on
Sept. 21, 2022 with 253 items from "Girardi's highly televised
Pasadena mansion," according to the auction website, including
wine, art, books and furniture.

A pair of Gucci men's leather shoes sold for $1,062,50 while a
nearly seven-foot tall sculpture by the late J. Stewart Johnson
Jr., sold for $13,750. Two handwritten letters to Santa Claus sold
for $260, and a 1996 Pokemon holographic card featuring the
Charizard character sold for $2,812.50. An autographed WWE flag
from Wrestlemania 2000 sold for $312.50, and a 1993 NBA Finals
basketball signed by Michael Jordan went for $4,687.50.

Miller hasn't been shy about trying to use Jayne and Girardi's fame
to try to recoup more money for the firm's long list of creditors:
She said in her Aug. 30, 2022 request regarding the earring auction
that the auctioneer "will capitalize on the TVG [Tom Vincent
Girardi] and Real Housewives of Beverly Hills connection in its
promotion" in an ad blitz that includes private, in-person previews
to top jewelry dealers and collectors in Los Angeles and New York
and a banner ad on Diamonds.net.

An estate auction in July 2021 netted about $300,000 in items
seized from the Girardi Keese headquarters in downtown Los Angeles,
including a 2011 Cadillac scooter for $6,400. A signed poster for
the movie Erin Brockovich also went for $1,550; the film was based
in part on Girardi’s work in a class action against California
utility giant Pacific Gas & Electric.

His firm's creditor list now includes Edward L. Masry, his
co-counsel in the case.

Jayne's lawyer, Evan Borges, has emphasized that she had no idea
what was going on with her husband's law firm, and that Girardi
controlled all their finances. Her direct knowledge, however, isn't
needed for the trustee to seek debt compensation through her:
Bankruptcy trustees frequently initiate so-called adversary
proceedings against recipients of fraudulently spent money who are
guilty of nothing more than accepting payments or goods without
knowing the true source.

With Jayne's earrings, Miller found financial records showing
Girardi had purchased them in 2007 with $750,000 from a highly
restricted client trust account created for mass torts litigation
he was leading involving the anti-diabetic drug Rezulin. The work
had given him a huge payout: Miller found records showing his firm
received $22.5 million in attorney fees and costs.

The money in the client trust account was meant for clients who’d
been victimized by the Rezulin drug, and the fact that some of it
paid for the earrings means Jayne "has no legal or equitable right"
to the earrings, Miller wrote in her initial request in January
2022. Russell agreed but found there was no evidence Jayne knew of
the true source of the gift, which her lawyer emphasized in his new
appellate brief, arguing it shows Miller didn’t prove the
earrings are indisputably property of the firm’s estate as the
law requires.

"Ms. Girardi owned and wore the earrings for over 15 years prior to
the Trustee's action, and never had reason to doubt her ownership,"
wrote Borges, a partner at Greenberg Gross LLP. His main argument,
though, focuses on the statute of limitations for claiming
fraudulent transfers, which he said "extinguishes any cause of
action for fraudulent transfer based on transactions occurring more
than seven years before an action is filed."

However, Miller's lawyer, Larry Gabriel, argues the appellate
issues concern whether Girardi committed embezzlement by using
stolen money to buy the earrings, and whether Jayne "committed the
act of conversion" when she initially refused to handover the
earrings after she was informed they'd been purchased with money
meant for her husband's clients.

Gabriel will be able to file a formal reply to Borges' brief before
the assigned judge, U.S. District Judge Dale S. Fischer in Los
Angeles, makes a decision.

Meanwhile, Miller moved last week for permission to sell
Girardi’s Pasadena mansion to a couple for $7.5 million.

                        About Girardi & Keese

Girardi and Keese or Girardi & Keese was a Los Angeles-based law
firm founded in 1965 by lawyers Thomas Girardi and Robert Keese. It
served clients in California in a variety of legal areas. It was
known for representing plaintiffs against major corporations.

An involuntary Chapter 7 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
20-21022) was filed in December 2020 against GIRARDI KEESE by
alleged creditors Jill O'Callahan, Robert M. Keese, John Abassian,
Erika Saldana, Virginia Antonio, and Kimberly Archie.

The petitioners' attorneys:

         Andrew Goodman
         Goodman Law Offices, Apc
         Tel: 818-802-5044
         E-mail: agoodman@andyglaw.com

Elissa D. Miller, a member of the firm SulmeyerKupetz, has been
appointed as Chapter 7 trustee for GIRARDI KEESE. The Chapter 7
trustee can be reached at:

         Elissa D. Miller
         333 South Grand Ave., Suite 3400
         Los Angeles, California 90071-1406
         Telephone: (213) 626-2311
         Facsimile: (213) 629-4520
         E-mail: emiller@sulmeyerlaw.com

An involuntary Chapter 7 petition was also filed against Thomas
Vincent Girardi (Case No. 20-21020) on Dec. 18, 2020. The Chapter 7
trustee can be reached at:

         Jason M. Rund
         Email: trustee@srlawyers.com
         840 Apollo Street, Suite 351
         El Segundo, CA  90245
         Telephone: (310) 640-1200


GTT COMMUNICATIONS: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to Dec. 31
-----------------------------------------------------------------
GTT Communications, Inc. and its affiliates are seeking court
approval to remain in control of their bankruptcy while awaiting
regulatory approvals required to consummate the $2.8 billion debt
reduction deal contemplated by their Chapter 11 reorganization plan
approved late last year.

In their motion, the companies asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York to extend their exclusive right
to file a Chapter 11 plan to Dec. 31 and to solicit acceptances for
the plan to March 1 next year.

The companies will use the extension to get approval for the
restructuring transactions from a foreign direct investment
regulatory authority in the United Kingdom and from the California
Public Utilities Commission.

The companies applied before the CPUC for approval of corporate
restructuring to address "transfer of control" issues applicable to
California public utilities. The application has been pending for
more than nine months.

The delay has caused "certain ripple effects" on the companies'
liquidity profile, forcing them to update agreements with lenders,
according to the companies' attorney, Philip Dublin, Esq., at Akin
Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP.

"An expiration of the exclusive periods at this juncture could
result in the [companies] and their stakeholders needing to return
to square one in the Chapter 11 plan process and, potentially,
derail the regulatory approval processes that currently are
underway," Mr. Dublin said in a motion filed in court.  

The exclusivity motion is on the court's calendar for Oct. 12.

                    About GTT Communications

Headquartered in McLean, Va., GTT Communications, Inc. --
http://www.gtt.net/-- owns and operates a global Tier 1 Internet
network and provides a comprehensive suite of cloud networking
services.

GTT and its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 21-11880) on Oct. 31, 2021, to implement a
prepackaged Chapter 11 plan.

GTT had total assets of $2.8 billion and total debt of $4.1 billion
as of June 30, 2021.  As of the petition date, the Debtors had
pre-bankruptcy funded indebtedness totaling $2.015 billion.

Judge Michael E. Wiles oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP as legal
counsel; TRS Advisors as financial advisor and investment banker;
The Siegfried Group, LLP as accounting and financial resource
services provider; Ernst & Young LLP as tax, valuation and
accounting and advisory services provider; and Alvarez & Marsal,
LLC as restructuring advisor.  Brian Fox, Alvarez & Marsal's
managing director, serves as the Debtors' chief restructuring
officer.  Prime Clerk, LLC is the claims agent and administrative
advisor.

On Dec. 16, 2021, the court approved the Debtors' disclosure
statement and confirmed their joint prepackaged Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.


H&S ALANG: Unsecureds Will Get 10% of Claims in 36 Months
---------------------------------------------------------
H&S Alang, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Texas a Disclosure Statement for Plan of
Reorganization dated October 4, 2022.

The Debtor is the owner of the real property and improvements
located at 604 S. Lindsey Lane, Pearsall, TX 78061, where the
Debtor operates a hotel as a franchisee of the "Hampton Inn" brand
(the "Hotel").

The Debtor intends to change its brand following confirmation and
will use its operating income to make payments under the Plan and
pay ordinary operating expenses. The Debtor also intends to
complete repairs that have been identified in the approximate
amount of $250,000.

The Debtor scheduled aggregate liabilities in the amount of
$5,040,158.30 as of the Petition Date. The Secured Claim of
$2,951,449.93 held by Pearsall Holdings, LLC is the largest Claim
in this bankruptcy case.

The Plan is a Plan of Reorganization. The Debtor will continue its
business after Confirmation of this Plan.

Class 1 shall consist of the Allowed Secured Claims of Pearsall
ISD. Class 1 Claims shall be paid in full in 60 equal monthly
installments of principal plus interest accruing from the Petition
Date at the rate of 12% per annum. Payments will commence on the
first day of the first month after the Effective Date and continue
on the first day of each month thereafter until the Claims are paid
in full. This Claim is Impaired.

Class 2 shall consist of the Allowed Secured Claims of Frio
Hospital District. Class 2 Claims shall be paid in full in 36 equal
monthly installments of principal plus interest accruing from the
Petition Date at the rate of 12% per annum. Payments will commence
on the first day of the first month after the Effective Date and
continue on the first day of each month thereafter until the Claims
are paid in full. This Claim is Impaired.

Class 3 consist of Allowed Secured Claims of Pearsall Holdings,
LLC. On or before the Effective Date, Pearsall may sell and
transfer to American Bank, N.A. (the "Bank") the promissory note
(the "Note"), deed of trust and all related loan documents under
which the Debtor is obligated to Pearsall, for the cash sum of
$2,200,000.00. Immediately after the Note has been transferred to
the Bank, the Bank and the Debtor shall execute a modification of
the Note, as follows:

     * The Debtor will be obligated to make a $300,000.00 principal
payment on the modified Note no later than 60 days after the
Effective Date. The source of funds to make this payment shall be a
$300,000.00 capital contribution by Dr. Jaspreet S. Alang, the
Debtor's equity owner.

     * To secure the obligation to make the $300,000.00 capital
contribution, Dr. Alang shall separately agree with the Bank to
cause the owner of the improved real property in which Dr. Alang's
medical practice is located (i.e., an office condominium at 3880
Parkwood Blvd., Unit 304, Frisco, Texas 75034, hereinafter the
"Medical Building"), to grant to the Bank a first priority deed of
trust lien on the Medical Building, which the Bank will release at
the time of Dr. Alang's capital contribution and the Debtor's
payment to the Bank of the aforementioned $300,000.00 principal
reduction.

Class 4 consist of the Allowed Secured Claims of the U.S. Small
Business Association ("SBA"). The Class 4 Allowed Secured Claims of
the SBA, if any, shall be paid $50,000.00 on the Effective Date.
The remaining balance of the SBA Allowed Claim shall be treated as
a Class 5 Claimant. This Claim is Impaired.

Class 5 consist of the Allowed General Unsecured Claims other than
Insider Claims. Class 5 Claimants shall be paid 10% of their claims
over 36 months from the Effective Date, Payments shall be made on
the first day of the first month following the Effective Date and
continuing on the first day of each month thereafter for a total of
36 months. These Claims are Impaired.

Class 6 shall consist of the Allowed Claims of Insiders of the
Debtor. Class 6 Claims shall receive nothing under this Plan.These
Claims are Impaired.

Class 7 shall consist of Allowed Equity Interests in the Debtor.
Class 7 Interests shall be solely held by Dr. Alang. These
Interests are Impaired.

The Debtor will use its normal operating income to make payments
under the Plan and pay operating expenses.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated October 4, 2022,
is available at https://bit.ly/3fSTPyd from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Attorneys for Debtor:

     Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq.
     Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney, PLLC
     1412 Main Street, Suite 500
     Dallas, TX 75202
     Tel: (972) 503-4033
     Email: joyce@joycelindauer.com

                      About H&S Alang, LLC

H&S Alang, LLC, operates a Hampton Inn hotel located in Pearsall,
Texas.  H&S Alang, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 22-40712) on June
6, 2022. In the petition filed by Jaspreet S. Alang, manager, the
Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Brenda T. Rhoades oversees the case.

Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq., at Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney, PLLC, is
the Debtor's counsel.

Pearsall Holdings, LLC, as secured creditor, is represented by
Kenneth Stohner Jr., Esq. at Jackson Walker LLP.


HIGHPOINT LIFEHOPE: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 6 disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Highpoint Lifehope SPE, LLC.
  
                   About Highpoint Lifehope SPE

Highpoint Lifehope SPE, LLC, also known as Honan Property
Management - Highpoint, is a Single Asset Real Estate (as defined
in 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(51B)).  

Highpoint Lifehope SPE sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Texas Case No. 22-50929) on Aug.
22, 2022. In the petition filed by Scott C. Honan, as manager, the
Debtor reports estimated assets and liabilities between $50 million
and $100 million each.

The Debtor is represented by Natalie F. Wilson, Esq., at Langley &
Banack Inc.


INMAR INC: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'B-' ICR
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its ratings on Inmar Inc., a
Winston-Salem-based provider of technology-enabled coupon and
inventory, logistics, and settlement services, including its 'B-'
issuer credit rating and revised our outlook to negative from
stable.

The negative outlook reflects the risk that Inmar is unable or
unwilling to refinance its upcoming maturities before they become
current due to adverse market conditions and that a potential
refinancing at elevated rates could result in negligible free
operating cash flow generation.

The negative outlook reflects the risk that Inmar is unable or
unwilling to refinance its 2024 maturities in a timely manner due
to adverse market conditions. S&P said, "Under our base case, we
expect Inmar to refinance its upcoming debt maturities before they
become current, but with higher interest costs. Inmar's debt
capitalization includes a $75 million revolving credit facility
($12 million drawn) that matures in January 2024 and $1.1 billion
first-lien term loan that matures in May 2024. S&P Global
economists recently revised their U.S. macroeconomic forecast which
now includes a shallow recession in the first half of 2023. While
we believe Inmar's good long-term growth prospects, revenue
visibility, and relatively stable EBITDA margins should support a
refinancing transaction, we believe the company's growth could
weaken in 2023 if advertisers pull back on their 2023 budgets. Our
forecast also includes a base rate of about 3.5% in 2023 with an
increased margin of about 300 basis points from Inmar's current
first-lien interest rate. We expect these factors will result in
low-single-digit free operating cash flow (FOCF) in 2022 and
2023."

Inmar's cash flow generation remains weak despite EBITDA growth.
With over $1 billion of unhedged floating rate debt, the company's
interest expense has increased with rising rates over the course of
2022. S&P said, "In addition, we expect Inmar's cash tax payments
will be elevated in 2022 due to a change in the tax accounting
rules for 2022 that limit the amount of capitalized software
development costs it can deduct from its taxable income. We expect
these factors will contribute to FOCF to debt deterioration to the
low-1% area in 2022 and 2023 from 3.5% in 2021. We also expect cash
flow will be under pressure in 2023 due to our forecast for flat
growth in a rising interest rate environment with additional risk
to the downside if the company refinances over $1 billion of debt
at significantly higher rates. Although we forecast growth to stall
in 2023, we believe Inmar is positioned to resume revenue growth
after the dampening effects of a recession."

S&P said, "Still, we expect total revenue to grow 10%-12% for the
year primarily as a result of two large acquisitions made in 2021
as well as mid-single-digit organic growth in the company's health
care and retail segments. We expect EBITDA margins will return to
pre-pandemic levels in the low-20% area by the end of 2022 from its
low of about 16% in 2021, indicating solid efforts to integrate the
acquisitions quickly and control costs.

"Inmar's financial sponsor ownership's debt-funded growth strategy
also contributes to our expectation for leverage to remain above 7x
over the next two years. Inmar is owned by OMERS Private Equity. We
believe financial sponsors tend to prioritize shareholder returns
over debt repayment, thus leverage is likely to remain high. In the
past few years, the company issued additional debt to fund the
acquisitions of YouTech, Aki Technologies, and Qualanex, which have
significantly increased the scale of the business. We believe the
fragmented and competitive nature of its marketplace will provide
additional acquisition opportunities funded with incremental debt.

"The negative outlook reflects the risk that Inmar is unable or
unwilling to refinance its upcoming maturities before they become
current due to adverse market conditions and that a potential
refinancing at elevated rates could result in negligible FOCF
generation.

"We could lower the rating if we do not expect Inmar to refinance
and extend the maturity of its first-lien term loan before it
becomes current on May 1, 2023, or if the company agrees to
refinancing terms that will result in an unsustainable capital
structure, in our view. In this scenario, a refinancing at very
high interest rates results in negligible or negative FOCF on a
sustained basis.

"We could revise the outlook to stable if Inmar extends its
upcoming maturities well beyond 2024 through a refinancing
transaction with terms that allow it to generate sustained positive
FOCF."

ESG credit indicators: E-2, S-2, G-3

S&P said, "ESG factors have an overall negligible influence on our
ratings for Inmar. Governance factors are a moderately negative
consideration in our credit rating analysis of the company, as is
the case for most rated entities owned by private-equity sponsors.
We believe the company's highly leveraged financial risk profile
points to corporate decision-making that prioritizes the interests
of controlling owners. This also reflects the generally finite
holding periods and a focus on maximizing shareholder returns."



INSTASET PLASTICS: Seeks Cash Collateral Access, $800,000 DIP Loan
------------------------------------------------------------------
Instaset Plastics Company, LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, for authority
to use cash collateral and obtain postpetition secured financing.

The Debtor seeks to obtain credit and incur debt in accordance with
the Promissory Note & Security Agreement between the Debtor and WGS
Global Services, L.C.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor entered into an Asset
Purchase Agreement with Clarion Technologies, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, for the purchase of certain of the Debtor's executory
contracts and related inventory.

In order to ensure that the Debtor is able to continue operating
through the Closing Date as set forth in the Clarion APA, WGS has
agreed to provide the Debtor with funds for administrative expenses
and to maintain and preserve the value of the executory contracts,
as more fully set forth on the budget, between the date thereof and
the Closing Date as defined in the Clarion APA, in order to be able
to sell and transfer the same to Clarion pursuant to the terms
thereof, WGS agrees, to lend, in its reasonable discretion and in
accordance with the Budget, subsequent to the filing of the
Bankruptcy Case, and to advance up to $800,000 under the RLOC Note
in the aggregate to Debtor upon the Debtor's written requests
therefor from time to time.

The occurrence of any of the following will, at WGS's option,
constitute a "DIP Event of Default" with respect to the DIP Loan
and the Agreement:

     a. Any representation or warranty of the Debtor made therein
or in any other document related thereto or in any other writing
given to WGS in connection with the RLOC Note and/or the Advances
will have been misleading or incorrect in any material respect as
of the time when the same will have been made; and

     b. If an order will be entered by the Bankruptcy Court
dismissing the Debtor's chapter 11 case which does not contain a
provision for payment in full in cash of all obligations thereunder
upon entry thereof.

The Debtor needs to obtain post-petition financing and to use its
operating cash in order to maintain its business and its going
concern value for the benefit of creditors.

Huntington Bank and WGS assert claims in the Debtor's pre-petition
cash collateral. Huntington Bank is the senior secured creditor to
the Debtor. The Debtor has a long relationship with Huntington Bank
and its predecessors in interest.

The Debtor is indebted to the Huntington Bank pursuant to an
Amended and Restated Promissory Note, dated May 13, 2019, executed
by the Debtor and WGS as co-borrowers, in favor of Chemical Bank,
and now held by Huntington Bank, in the original principal sums of
up to $2,000,000, as subsequently reduced to the maximum principal
sum of $1,250,000.  The Debtor's approximate outstanding balances
due to Huntington Bank as of the Petition Date is $557,311.

In conjunction with the extensions of credit and other
accommodations between the Debtor, WGS and the Huntington Bank,
several documents, among others, were executed, which set forth
additional terms and conditions governing the loan relationship.

WGS's secured interest in the Debtor is junior to Huntington Bank.
The Debtor is indebted to WGS pursuant to the RLOC Note effective
on January 1, 2022, in the original principal sum of up to
$2,000,000. The approximate outstanding balance due to WGS as of
the Petition Date is $692,745 under the RLOC Note.

The Debtor is proposing to provide adequate protection to
Huntington Bank and WGS:

     a. The Debtor will grant Huntington Bank and WGS replacement
liens in the Debtor's post-petition assets, effective as of the
Petition Date, including all accounts receivable, to the same
extent, validity and in the same priority as such liens existed on
the Petition Date.

     b. Within two days of the entry of the Interim Order, the
Debtor will Advance on the RLOC Note and pay the Huntington Note in
full. Upon the failure of the Debtor to Advance on the RLOC Note,
the Debtor's right to use cash collateral under the Interim Order
will cease upon the filing of an Affidavit of Default by Huntington
Bank and Huntington Bank will have the right to seek to lift the
automatic stay on an expedited basis.

A copy of the motion is available at https://bit.ly/3C9PdLC from
PacerMonitor.com.

A copy of the budget is available at https://bit.ly/3ehJZFR from
PacerMonitor.com.

The budget provides for total expenses, on a weekly basis, as
follows:

     $542,056 for the week ending October 8, 2022;
     $283,604 for the week ending October 15, 2022;
     $213,372 for the week ending October 22, 2022;
     $215,551 for the week ending October 29, 2022;
     $234,100 for the week ending November 5, 2022;
     $214,927 for the week ending November 12, 2022;
     $226,802 for the week ending November 19, 2022; and
     $198,497 for the week ending November 26, 2022.

               About Instaset Plastics Company, LLC

Instaset Plastics Company, LLC is a plastic fabrication company in
Michigan.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 22-47794) on October 5,
2022. In the petition signed by McGustavus Miller, Jr., chief
restructuring officer, the Debtor disclosed $1,373,383 in assets
and $3,782,844 in liabilities.

Lynn M. Brimer, Esq., at Strobl Sharp PLLC, is the Debtor's
counsel.


ISABEL ENTERPRISES: Affiliate Wants More Time for Chapter 11 Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Isabel, LLC, an affiliate of Isabel Enterprises, Inc. obtained a
court order extending its exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan
to Nov. 13 and solicit acceptances from creditors to Jan. 12 next
year.

The ruling by Judge Peter Mckittrick of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Oregon allows the company to pursue its own
plan for emerging from Chapter 11 protection without the threat of
a rival plan from creditors.

Isabel LLC and Isabel Enterprises on June 27 filed their joint
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization, which seeks to restructure the
pre-bankruptcy claims of creditors in order to attract sufficient
new capital in the form of loans, and secure extensions of credit
from vendors. This will allow the reorganized Isabel Enterprises to
resume operations pursuant to its new business plan and generate
sufficient revenues to cover its operating costs, including lease
payments to reorganized Isabel, LLC.

The hearing on confirmation of the plan is scheduled for Nov. 15.

                     About Isabel Enterprises

Isabel Enterprises, Inc.'s affiliate Isabel LLC owns two tax lots
consisting of a commercial unit located at 330 NW 10th Ave., Suite
116, Portland, Ore., and a related parking unit. Historically,
Isabel LLC leased the property to Isabel Enterprises, which
operated a restaurant on the premises commonly known as the Isabel
Pearl. Amid deteriorating conditions in the neighborhood and the
pandemic, the restaurant shut operations in July 2019.

Amid an impending sale of the property as a result of a foreclosure
action initially instituted by the Condominium Owners' Association,
Isabel Enterprises and Isabel LLC sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Ore. Lead Case No. 22-30801) on May 18, 2022. In its
petition, Isabel Enterprises was estimated to have $50,000 to
$100,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.

Judge Peter C. Mckittrick oversees the cases.

Oren B. Haker, Esq., at Stoel Rives, LLP and Strategic Tax
Management serve as the Debtors' legal counsel and accountant,
respectively.  

The Debtors filed their joint Chapter 11 plan of reorganization on
June 27, 2022.


JAJE ONE: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
--------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Jaje One, LLC.
  
                          About Jaje One

Jaje One, LLC, a company in Miami Beach, Fla., sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case
No. 22-16629) on Aug. 28, 2022, with up to $10 million in assets
and up to $1 million in liabilities. Judge Robert A. Mark oversees
the case.

The Debtor is represented by Joel M. Aresty, Esq., at Joel M.
Aresty, P.A.


JASPER PELLETS: Wants More Time for Chapter 11 Plan
---------------------------------------------------
Jasper Pellets, LLC seeks court approval to remain in control of
its bankruptcy while it pursues a sale of substantially all of its
assets.

In its motion, the company asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of South Carolina to extend its exclusive right to file a
Chapter 11 plan to Nov. 30 and solicit acceptances for the plan to
Jan. 31 next year.

The extension will give the company enough time to get through the
sales process and then pursue a plan to emerge from bankruptcy,
according to its attorney, Adam Floyd, Esq., at BEAL, LLC.

Jasper Pellets filed a motion last month seeking court approval to
sell most of its assets. A hearing on the sale motion is set for
Oct. 25 while an auction of the assets is scheduled for Oct. 19.
The sale is expected to close on Oct. 31, according to court
filings.

                        About Jasper Pellets

Jasper Pellets, LLC, a wood pellet manufacturing company, filed its
voluntary petition for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.S.C. Case
No. 22-01409) on May 27, 2022, with $25,119,486 in assets and
$14,422,514 in liabilities. Charles Knight, managing member, signed
the petition.

Judge Elisabetta Gm Gasparini presides over the case.

BEAL, LLC and FTI Capital Advisors, LLC serve as the Debtor's legal
counsel and investment banker, respectively.

The official committee of unsecured creditors appointed in the
Debtor's case is represented by Walker Gressette & Linton, LLC.


JEFFERSON LA BREA: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Dec 31
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California,
Los Angeles Division, authorized Jefferson La Brea D&J Properties
LLC on a final basis through December 31, 2022.

The Debtor is permitted to use the cash collateral solely to pay
the expenses set forth in the budget or such further budget that
may be approved by the secured creditors or the Court. The Debtor
will be deemed in compliance with the Budget as long as, for any
particular operating month, (1) the aggregate expenditures for all
categories set forth in the Budget do not exceed the budgeted
aggregate expenses by more than 15% and (2) the expenditures with
respect to any particular category of expense set forth in the
Budget does not exceed the amount set forth in the budget for such
category by more than 20%.

Mega Bank and JBM Family Trust assert an interest in the Debtor's
cash collateral.

Each secured creditor of record will receive, as adequate
protection, a replacement lien on postpetition collateral for any
diminution in the secured creditor's collateral as of the Petition
Date arising from the Debtor's use of such collateral but only to
the same extent, priority, applicability and validity as the
prepetition lien held by the secured creditor.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3VbZRuk from
PacerMonitor.com.

         About Jefferson La Brea D&J Properties LLC

Jefferson La Brea D&J Properties LLC leases a commercial property
located at 5112-5118 W. Jefferson Blvd., and 3409-3421 S. La Brea
Avenue, in Los Angeles.  Jefferson La Brea D&J Properties LLC
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 22-14481) on August 17, 2022. The Debtor
considers itself a Single Asset Real Estate (as defined in 11
U.S.C. Sec. 101(51B)).

In the petition filed by Jason E. Upchurch, as manager, the Debtor
estimated assets between $10 million and $50 million and estimated
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.

Judge Vincent P. Zurzolo oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by David B. Shemano, Esq., at
ShemanoLaw.



JNF INVESTMENTS: Capital Infusion to Fund Plan Payments
-------------------------------------------------------
JNF Investments, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida a Disclosure Statement for Small
Business Chapter 11 Plan dated October 4, 2022.

The Debtor is a Limited Liability Company incorporated in 2016. The
sole purpose of establishing the LLC was to transfer title to
homestead property into the LLC in order to secure re-financing of
the mortgage.

The Debtor was unable to maintain payments on its sole asset (real
property), requiring the Debtor to file bankruptcy in order to sell
the asset, pay the secured creditors in full, and retain the
balance of the equity in the asset.

The Debtor promptly listed its only asset (real estate) with a
licensed realtor/broker at fair market value. Debtor intends to pay
its secured creditors in full once the property sells, and retain
any remaining funds. The property is located at 8340 SW 155
Terrace, Palmetto Bay, FL 33157.

The Plan will be funded by Jayment Alvarez, sole managing member,
while the property is listed and sold. The payments are to be
considered adequate protection payments and are being provided
until the sale of the property, at which time each secured creditor
will be paid in full.

Class 2(b) consists of the claim of Miami Dade County Tax
Collector. The creditor has a security interest and will receive
100% of its lien rights. Debtor will make adequate protection
payments and upon the sale of the property will be made whole.
Proof of claim amount $8170.00 payable monthly at $680.83. The
monthly amount is to be paid in 12 months.

Class 2(c) consists of the claim of Keys Funding LLC-6222. The
creditor has a security interest and will receive 100% of its lien
rights. Debtor will make adequate protection payments and upon the
sale of the property will be made whole. Proof of claim amount of
$9,434.49 payable monthly $786.21. The monthly amount is to be paid
in 12 months.

Class 2(d) consists of the claim of The Children Education
Initiative. The creditor has a security interest and will receive
100% of its lien rights. Debtor will make adequate protection
payments and upon the sale of the property will be made whole.
Proof of claim amount $8,767.12 payable monthly $730.59. The
monthly amount is to be paid in 12 months.

The Debtor has no Non-priority unsecured creditors.

The Debtor's asset consist of a single family property in which
there is sufficient equity to pay all of the secured creditors. The
sole managing member, Jaymet Alvarez will make capital infusions to
the fund the plan while the property is being listed for sale. The
payments are to be considered adequate protection payments and are
being provided until the sale of the property. The payments will be
used to offset any concerns of equity erosion from the secured
creditors.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated October 4, 2022,
is available at https://bit.ly/3fLkxJ7 from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Debtor's Counsel:

     Kathy L. Houston, Esq.
     The Houston Law Firm, PA
     15321 S. Dixie Hwy., Ste. 205
     Miami, FL 33157-1814
     Telephone: (305) 420-6609
     Facsimile: (786) 441-4416
     Email: mail@houstonlawfl.com
     
                       About JNF
Investments

JNF Investments, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 22-14005) on May 22,
2022, listing up to $1 million in both assets and liabilities.
Jaymet Alvarez, manager, signed the petition.

Judge Laurel M. Isicoff oversees the case.

Kathy L. Houston, Esq., at The Houston Law Firm, PA serves as the
Debtor's counsel.


JNF INVESTMENTS: Capital Infusion to Fund Plan Payments
-------------------------------------------------------
JNF Investments, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida a Plan of Reorganization for Small
Business dated October 3, 2022.

This Plan of Reorganization proposes to pay creditors of the Debtor
from Capital infusion from Jaymet Alvarez, sole managing member.

Non-priority unsecured creditors holding allowed claims will
receive distributions, which the proponent of this Plan has valued
at approximately 0 cents on the dollar. This Plan also provides for
the payment of administrative and priority claims.

Class 2(a) consists of the claim of CH LM Funding LLC. The
creditor's security interest is mortgage and will receive 100% of
its lien rights. Debtor will make adequate protection payments and
upon the sale of the property will be made whole. Monthly Payment
of $2,660.41 interest only. The figure used was proof of claim
amount $751,173.83 at 4.25%.

Class 2(b) consists of the claim of Miami Dade County Tax
Collector. The creditor has a security interest and will receive
100% of its lien rights. Debtor will make adequate protection
payments and upon the sale of the property will be made whole.
Proof of claim amount $8170.00 payable monthly at $680.83. The
monthly amount is to be paid in 12 months.

Class 2(c) consists of the claim of Keys Funding LLC-6222. The
creditor has a security interest and will receive 100% of its lien
rights. Debtor will make adequate protection payments and upon the
sale of the property will be made whole. Proof of claim amount of
$9,434.49 payable monthly $786.21. The monthly amount is to be paid
in 12 months.

Class 2(d) consists of the claim of The Children Education
Initiative. The creditor has a security interest and will receive
100% of its lien rights. Debtor will make adequate protection
payments and upon the sale of the property will be made whole.
Proof of claim amount $8,767.12 payable monthly $730.59. The
monthly amount is to be paid in 12 months.

The Debtor has no Non-priority unsecured creditors.

The Debtor's asset consist of a single family property in which
there is sufficient equity to pay all of the secured creditors. The
sole managing member, Jaymet Alvarez will make capital infusions to
the fund the plan while the property is being listed for sale. The
payments are to be considered adequate protection payments and are
being provided until the sale of the property. The payments will be
used to offset any concerns of equity erosion from the secured
creditors.

A full-text copy of the Plan of Reorganization dated October 3,
2022, is available at https://bit.ly/3MdFOaN from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Debtor's Counsel:

     Kathy L. Houston, Esq.
     The Houston Law Firm, PA
     15321 S. Dixie Hwy., Ste. 205
     Miami, FL 33157-1814
     Telephone: (305) 420-6609
     Facsimile: (786) 441-4416
     Email: mail@houstonlawfl.com
     
                       About JNF
Investments

JNF Investments, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 22-14005) on May 22,
2022, listing up to $1 million in both assets and liabilities.
Jaymet Alvarez, manager, signed the petition.

Judge Laurel M. Isicoff oversees the case.

Kathy L. Houston, Esq., at The Houston Law Firm, PA serves as the
Debtor's counsel.


KABBAGE INC: GUC Trust or Causes of Action Proceeds to Fund Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Kabbage, Inc. d/b/a KServicing, and its Affiliated Debtors filed
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware a Joint
Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation and Disclosure Statement dated
October 4, 2022.

This Plan groups the Debtors together solely for the purpose of
describing treatment under this Plan, confirmation of this Plan,
and Plan Distributions to be made in respect of Claims against and
Interests in the Debtors under this Plan.

This Plan is being proposed as a joint chapter 11 plan of the
Debtors for administrative purposes only and constitutes a separate
chapter 11 plan for each Debtor. This Plan is not premised upon the
substantive consolidation of the Debtors with respect to the
Classes of Claims of Interests set forth in this Plan.

Class 1 consists of Priority Non-Tax Claims against the Debtors. On
or as soon as practicable after the Effective Date, except to the
extent that a holder of an Allowed Priority Non-Tax Claim agrees to
less favorable treatment, each holder thereof shall be paid in full
in Cash or otherwise receive treatment consistent with the
provisions of section 1129(a)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Class 2 consists of the Other Secured Claims against the Debtors.
Each holder of an Allowed Other Secured Claim will receive, on
account of such Allowed Claim, at the sole option of the Debtors or
the Plan Administrator, as applicable: (i) Cash in an amount equal
to the Allowed amount of such Claim; (ii) such other treatment
sufficient to render such holder's Allowed Other Secured Claim
Unimpaired; or (iii) return of the applicable collateral in
satisfaction of the Allowed amount of such Other Secured Claim.

Class 3 consists of the Reserve Bank Claims. Except to the extent
that a holder of an Allowed Reserve Bank Claim against the Debtors
agrees to a less favorable treatment of such Claim, each holder of
an Allowed Reserve Bank Claim in full and final satisfaction,
compromise, settlement, release, and discharge in exchange for:

Reserved Bank Secured Claims will receive:

* if the Funded Transaction occurs and the Reserve Bank elects: (x)
Post-Effective Date PPPLF Servicing, cash proceeds of the PPPLF
Collateral or (y) PPPLF Transfer, the return of the PPPLF
Collateral; or

     * if the Unfunded Transaction occurs (x) return of the PPPLF
Collateral.

Reserve Bank Priority Claims will receive:

     * if the Funded Transaction occurs: GUC Pool Class A Claims,
or

     * if the Unfunded Transaction occurs GUC Trust Beneficial A
Interests.

Class 4 consists of General Unsecured Claims against the Debtors.
Class 4 is Impaired. Except to the extent that a holder of an
Allowed General Unsecured Claim agrees to less favorable treatment
of such Claim, each holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim
will receive:

     * if the Funded Transaction occurs, its pro rata share of the
GUC Pool Class B Claims; or

     * if the Unfunded Transaction occurs, its pro rata share of
the GUC Trust Beneficial B Interests.

Class 6 consists of Intercompany Interests in the Debtors. On the
Effective Date, Intercompany Interests shall receive no recovery or
distribution and be reinstated solely to maintain the Debtors'
corporate structure, as necessary.

Class 8 consists of KServicing Equity Interests. Each such holder
thereof shall receive the following treatment: (i) on the Effective
Date, all KServicing Equity Interests shall be cancelled and one
share of KServicing common stock (the "Single Share") shall be
issued to the Plan Administrator to hold in trust as custodian for
the benefit of the former holders of KServicing Equity Interests
consistent with their former relative priority and economic
entitlements and the Single Share shall be recorded on the books
and records maintained by the Plan Administrator; (ii) each former
holder of KServicing Stock shall neither receive nor retain any
property of the Estate or direct interest in property of the Estate
on account of such KServicing Stock.

Provided, that in the event that all Allowed Claims have been
satisfied in full in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and the
Plan, each former holder of a KServicing Existing Equity Interests
may receive its share of any remaining assets of KServicing
consistent with such holder's rights of payment existing
immediately prior to the Commencement Date. Unless otherwise
determined by the Plan Administrator, on the date that KServicing's
Chapter 11 Case is closed, the Single Share issued on the Effective
Date shall be deemed cancelled and of no further force and effect.

The Debtors and the Plan Administrator, as applicable, shall fund
Distributions under this Plan with the Net Cash Proceeds. In the
event of a Funded Transaction, the Debtors and the Plan
Administrator shall fund Distributions under this Plan also with
proceeds from Estate Causes of Action. In the event of an Unfunded
Transaction, the GUC Trust shall fund Distributions to holders of
Allowed General Unsecured Claims from proceeds of the GUC Trust
Assets.  

A full-text copy of the Joint Plan dated October 4, 2022, is
available at https://bit.ly/3ylRHpl from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Proposed Attorneys for Debtors:

                Ray C. Schrock, P.C.
                Candace M. Arthur, Esq.
                Natasha S. Hwangpo, Esq.
                Chase A. Bentley, Esq.
                WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
                767 Fifth Avenue
                New York, New York 10153
                Tel: (212) 310-8000
                E-mail: ray.schrock@weil.com
                        candace.arthur@weil.com
                        natasha.hwangpo@weil.com
                        chase.bentley@weil.com

                Daniel J. DeFranceschi, Esq.
                Amanda R. Steele, Esq.
                Zachary I. Shapiro, Esq.
                Matthew P. Milana, Esq.
                RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
                One Rodney Square
                920 North King Street
                Wilmington, Delaware 19801
                Tel: (302) 651-7700
                E-mail: defranceschi@rlf.com
                        steele@rlf.com
                        shapiro@rlf.com
                        milana@rlf.com

                        About KServicing

Founded in 2010 and headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, Legacy
Kabbage (a predecessor of KServicing)
-- http://www.kservicing.com --was one of the leading fintech
providers of working capital to small businesses for over a decade.
Legacy Kabbage began as a proprietary online lending platform for
small businesses, providing loan services to over 250,000 American
small businesses, many of which were businesses that struggled to
receive adequate funding through traditional banking institutions.
Legacy Kabbage offered a variety of services to small business
owners, including providing small business loans, access to
flexible lines of credit, business checking accounts, online bill
payment methods, cash flow visualization tools, and e-gift
certificates through its website and software application. From
2020-2021, the Company provided and facilitated necessary funding
to small business owners through PPP loans during the COVID-19
pandemic. The Company's existing technology infrastructure
spearheaded its PPP work, which led to a total of $7 billion in
loans being originated by the Company.

The origination and servicing of PPP Loans and small business loans
to eligible borrowers was critical during a time of unprecedented
health and economic uncertainty brought about by the COVID-19
pandemic. On August 16, 2020, much of the Company's business was
sold to American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.
pursuant to an executed Agreement and Plan of Merger. As a result
of the merger, KServicing now operates in a limited capacity as (i)
a servicer and subservicer of PPP Loans, (ii) a software services
provider for lenders of PPP Loans, and (iii) a servicer of a minor
portfolio of non-PPP small business loans.

Kabbage is a trademark of American Express used under license;
Kabbage, Inc. d/b/a KServicing is not affiliated with American
Express.


KABBAGE INC: Oct. 11 Deadline Set for Panel Questionnaires
----------------------------------------------------------
The United States Trustee is soliciting members for committee of
unsecured creditors in the bankruptcy case Kabbage, Inc. d/b/a
KServicing.

If a party wishes to be considered for membership on any official
committee that is appointed, it must complete a Questionnaire
available at https://bit.ly/3T6dJV4 and return by email it to
Richard Schepacarter --  Richard.Schepacarter@usdoj.gov  -- at the
Office of the United States Trustee so that it is received no later
than 4:00 p.m., on Oct. 11, 2022.

If the U.S. Trustee receives sufficient creditor interest in the
solicitation, it may schedule a meeting or telephone conference for
the purpose of forming a committee.

                       About KServicing

Founded in 2010 and headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, Legacy
Kabbage (a predecessor of KServicing) -- http://www.kservicing.com

-- was one of the leading fintech providers of working capital to
small businesses for over a decade. Legacy Kabbage began as a
proprietary online lending platform for small businesses, providing
loan services to over 250,000 American small businesses, many of
which were businesses that struggled to receive adequate funding
through traditional banking institutions. Legacy Kabbage offered a
variety of services to small business owners, including providing
small business loans, access to flexible lines of credit, business
checking accounts, online bill payment methods, cash flow
visualization tools, and e-gift certificates through its website
and software application. From 2020-2021, the Company provided and
facilitated necessary funding to small business owners through PPP
loans during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company's existing
technology infrastructure spearheaded its PPP work, which led to a
total of $7 billion in loans being originated by the Company.

The origination and servicing of PPP Loans and small business loans
to eligible borrowers was critical during a time of unprecedented
health and economic uncertainty brought about by the COVID-19
pandemic. On August 16, 2020, much of the Company's business was
sold to American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.
pursuant to an executed Agreement and Plan of Merger. As a result
of the merger, KServicing now operates in a limited capacity as (i)
a servicer and subservicer of PPP Loans, (ii) a software services
provider for lenders of PPP Loans, and (iii) a servicer of a minor
portfolio of non-PPP small business loans.

Kabbage is a trademark of American Express used under license;
Kabbage, Inc. d/b/a KServicing is not affiliated with American
Express.



KENNEDY-WILSON HOLDINGS: S&P Places 'BB+' ICR on Watch Negative
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all its ratings on Kennedy-Wilson
Holdings Inc., including the 'BB+' issuer credit rating, on
CreditWatch with negative implications.

The negative CreditWatch placement signals the risk that, given
worsening economic conditions, credit metrics remain elevated from
the company's inability to execute on a substantial amount of
dispositions, with insufficient EBITDA generated from gains on
asset sales. S&P expects to resolve the CreditWatch placement
within the next two quarters.

Leverage is elevated as a slowdown in transaction activity has
resulted in a material decline to EBITDA. S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA was 18.4x as of June 30, 2022,
substantially higher than the range at which the company has
historically operated (8.5x–10.5x over the last six years) and a
near doubling from 9.6x as of year-end 2021. S&P calculated
adjusted debt to EBITDA is materially higher than that of the
company's calculated debt to EBITDA due to two key differences. S&P
said, "We account for preferred shares as 100% debt, consistent
with our treatment across real estate companies, while the company
treats them as 100% equity per its financials. Secondly, while we
include gains from asset sales in our adjusted EBITDA figure, we do
not include the company's pro rata share of fair value adjustments
from its co-investment portfolio, which the company considers as
EBITDA, as those are unrealized gains on assets that are marked to
market. This difference in EBITDA is the most significant
contributor to the delta between S&P's and the company's leverage
calculations.

While a modest increase in adjusted debt has contributed to the
spike in leverage over the past 12 months, a significant decline in
EBITDA is the primary cause for the deterioration to S&P-adjusted
key credit metrics. Over the past few years, the company has
consistently generated more than half of its EBITDA--roughly $325
million to $450 million annually--from gains on asset sales, a core
part of the company's operating strategy. Through the first two
quarters of 2022, the company has generated gains of just $13.8
million on the sale of real estate. Furthermore, the bulk of 2021
gains occurred during the second quarter of the year, with limited
gains during the second half of 2021, further depressing TTM EBITDA
as of June 30, 2022. S&P said, "We acknowledge that
Kennedy-Wilson's reliance on gains from asset sales will continue
to add volatility to the company's credit metrics but remain a key
component of EBITDA generation. We believe the steep decline of
gains and EBITDA during the first half of the year will be
difficult to make up for over the next few quarters, particularly
given weakening market conditions, pressuring our tolerance for
leverage at the current rating level."

The company's increase in secured debt is pressuring the ratings on
its senior unsecured notes. Kennedy-Wilson's large proportion and
increasing amount of secured debt, particularly backing its
multifamily platform in the U.S., continues to constrain recovery
prospects on its unsecured notes. A further increase in secured
debt or a reduction in unencumbered book value could result in
pressure to the company's notes.

Kennedy Wilson Europe Real Estate PLC's (KWE) senior unsecured
notes are rated 'BBB-', one notch above the issuer credit rating,
with a recovery rating of '2' indicating substantial recovery in
the event of a payment default. However, the rounded estimate has
decreased to 75% from 85% over the past year. Should the rounded
estimate fall below 70%, it would result in the notes being
downgraded to a rating in line with the issuer credit rating.

Kennedy-Wilson Inc.'s (KW's) senior unsecured notes are rated 'BB',
one notch below the issuer credit rating, with a recovery rating of
'5' indicating modest recovery in the event of a payment default.
The rounded estimate has decreased to 15% from 25% over the past
year. Should the rounded estimate fall below 10%, it would result
in the notes being downgraded to a rating two notches below the
issuer credit rating.

S&P said, "The CreditWatch negative placement reflects our belief
that it is unlikely the company will sufficiently improve its key
credit protection measures over the near term. We believe there is
a high likelihood that market conditions could remain pressured
over the next few quarters, as S&P Global's revised economic
forecast signals a looming recession and a more volatile
transaction environment for the company. We expect to resolve the
CreditWatch placement within the next two quarters."

ESG credit indicators: E-2, S-2, G-2



KISSIMMEE CONDOS: Bid to Use Cash Collateral, DIP Loan Denied
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida,
Orlando Division, denied the Debtor's motion for approval of
post-petition financing and use of cash collateral.

The Court held that, consistent with the findings of fact and
conclusions of law stated orally, rendered on October 4, 2022, and
recorded in open court, it made the ruling and retains jurisdiction
to issue supplemental written findings of fact and conclusions of
law to further explain the oral ruling.

As previously reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, Darren L.
Bradham asked the court for entry of an order prohibiting the
Debtor from using cash collateral.

Bradham filed a Proof of Claim against the estate for $1970,893 on
May 26, 2022.  Bradham said the Claim is predicated upon a Note and
secured by a first mortgage upon the Debtor's property, by which
the Debtor pledges the rents and its accounts as security for the
Note, along with an Assignment of Leases and Rents relating to the
Property. Bradham asserted he possesses a senior perfected security
interest in the rents, profits and income from the Debtor's
Property, including the Leased Unit.

The Debtor owns real property that comprises its condominium
project, including the condominium unit at 1801 Houston St.,
Kissimmee, FL 34743. Bradham noted that the Debtor's March 2022
Monthly Operating Report confirms the Debtor received rent for the
Leased Unit in the amount of $1,7500 for two months' worth of rent,
totaling $3,500. The Debtor has no other income for the period.

The March MOR further reveals the Debtor paid Softwood, LLC $1,500
in rents received form the Leased Unit. Bradham contended the rent
from the Leased Unit is secured in his favor and should be paid to
him. Bradham did not consent to the Debtor's use of cash
collateral. The Debtor has not offered Bradham adequate protection
or other compensation for its use and diminution of Bradham's cash
collateral.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3CohheG from
PacerMonitor.com.

             About Kissimmee Condos Partnership, LLC

Kissimmee Condos Partnership, LLC is a Florida limited liability
company formed on December 10, 2016, to hold and develop two
parcels of real property in Osceola County, Florida. Pre-petition
Kissimmee Condos developed and initiated the Project, which
includes the Soho at Lakeside and Tribeca at Lakeside, which are
both residential townhome developments to be built over several
phases.

The SoHo Condos feature modern three-bedroom two and a half bath
townhomes with early development starting prices around $250,000
with numerous options to upgrade and customize the living spaces
including luxury appliances and high-end kitchen details. The last
unit sold for $304,900, and the highest sale price to date was
$325,900. The Tribeca Condos is built on Kissimmee Condos' second
real property parcel utilizing the same three-bedroom floor plan
and opportunities for customization.

Kissimmee Condos sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 22-00994) on March 21,
2022.

In the petition signed by Ricardo Benzecry, manager, the Debtor
disclosed up to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.

R. Scott Shuker, Esq., at Shuker and Dorris, PA is the Debtor's
counsel.




LASHLINER INC: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Oct 31
------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Washington
authorized Lashliner Inc. to use cash collateral in accordance with
the budget and its agreement with the Bank of America NA through
October 31, 2022.

The Debtor is permitted to make expenditures in amounts not to
exceed 115% of the amount contained in the budget projection only
for the period specified in the Order, and for corresponding time
periods terminating on October 31.

The Debtor will maintain adequate protection of Bank of America
N.A.'s interest in the cash collateral by making monthly payments
on the Bank's secured claim, in the approximate amount of $2,500 a
month, based on a contractual floating rate of interest of the
Bank's Prime Rate plus 0.5%, for the period the Order is in effect,
payable on the first day of the month, starting with the September
1 payment.

The Bank is granted a replacement lien in, to and on, the Debtor's
post-petition cash, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and
all other categories of assets described in the UCC Financing
Statement that Bank maintains over the assets of the Debtor.

The Debtor is also directed to provide the Bank by no later than
October 31, 2022, a statement of actual receipts and disbursements
for the period October 12 to October 31, and monthly financial
projections reflecting the amount of Debtor's projected revenues,
necessary expenses and the resulting value of the assets securing
Bank's claim, for a forward-looking three-month period beginning
November 1.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3Erv8TY
fromPacerMonitor.com.

                        About LashLiner Inc.

LashLiner Inc., doing business as Lashliner LLC, is an innovative
cosmetics brand. The company's initial product is a patent-pending
magnetic eyeliner and eyelash system.  LashLiner Inc. filed a
petition for relief under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 22-11273) on August 8,
2022.  In the petition filed by Robert Kitzberger, as president,
the Debtor reported assets and liabilities between $1 million and
$10 million.

Kathryn E Perkins has been appointed as Subchapter V trustee.

The Law Offices of D. Merrit & Associates, is the Debtor's
counsel.



LEGACY POOLS: Unsecureds to Get Share of Income for 3 Years
-----------------------------------------------------------
Legacy Pools, LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida a Plan of Reorganization dated October
3, 2022.

Legacy Pools is a closely held Florida limited liability company
organized on August 24, 2017 which conducts business from a leased
warehouse/office located at 727 North Drive, Suite L, Melbourne
Florida 32934. The Debtor launched its business in 2017
specializing in the design of luxury pools.

Due to supply chain issues, increasing material costs, slow paying
customers, and other disruptions caused by the pandemic, it quickly
became difficult for the Debtor to meet its overhead obligations.
To bridge the gap and aid its ability to pay its operating
expenses, Debtor entered into 2 separate merchant cash advance
lending arrangements with MCA Servicing Company and Samson MCA, LLC
(collectively, the "MCA Providers"). Unfortunately, rather than aid
the Debtor's ability to meet its ongoing obligations, the MCA
Providers bilked the Debtor of available operating funds which
compounded the Debtor's poor financial condition.

Faced with ongoing litigation, the prospect of additional lawsuits,
potential licensing issues, and creditor collection efforts, Debtor
elected to pursue Chapter 11 relief to restructure its financial
affairs for the benefit of its various stakeholders and continue
the operation of its pool construction business. Shortly after the
Petition Date, Debtor employed Daniel A. Velasquez and the law
offices of Latham, Luna, Eden & Beaudine, LLP to facilitate its
reorganization efforts.

Class 13 consists of all Allowed General Unsecured Claims against
the Debtor held by parties who elect to not participate as a
beneficiary of the Construction Trust. In full satisfaction of
their Allowed Class 13 General Unsecured Claims, Holders of Class
13 Claims shall receive annual pro rata distributions of the
Debtor's Disposable Income on November 30th of each year over a
term of 3 years from the Effective Date after Administrative Claims
and Priority Claims are satisfied in full.

The first Distribution of Disposable Income (if any) under the Plan
will occur on November 30, 2023. In addition to the receipt of
Debtor’s Disposable Income, Class 13 Claimholders shall receive a
pro rata share of the net proceeds recovered from all Causes of
Action after payment of professional fees and costs associated with
such collection efforts, and after Administrative Claims and
Priority Claims are paid in full. The maximum Distribution to Class
13 Claimholders shall be equal to the total amount of all Allowed
Class 13 General Unsecured Claims. Class 13 is Impaired.

Class 14 consists of all equity interests in Legacy Pools, LLC.
Class 14 Interest Holders shall retain their respective Interests
in Legacy Pools, LLC in the same proportions such Interest were
held as of the Petition Date (i.e., 100.00% Interest to Charles
Black). Class 14 is Unimpaired.

The Plan contemplates the Debtor will continue to manage and
operate its business in the ordinary course, but with restructured
debt obligations, reduced overhead, and fewer assets. It is
anticipated that the Debtor's continued operations will mainly
involve pool design and construction management services, any
Disposable Income from such operations will be committed to make
the Plan Payments.

As it pertains to Causes of Action, Debtor has done an initial
investigation by reviewing its books and records and has identified
several preference actions and 3 construction lien foreclosure
cases it intends to pursue post-confirmation. The potential
recoveries from the Causes of Action could exceed $500,000.00;
although recoveries through litigation are uncertain.

Funds generated from the Debtor's operations through the Effective
Date will be used for Plan Payments; however, the Debtor's cash on
hand as of Confirmation will be available for payment of
Administrative Expenses.

A full-text copy of the Plan of Reorganization dated October 3,
2022, is available at https://bit.ly/3EnVsOQ from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtor:

     Daniel A. Velasquez, Esq.
     Latham Luna Eden & Beaudine, LLP
     201 S. Orange Ave., Suite 1400
     Orlando, FL 32801
     Tel: (407) 481-5800
     Fax: (407) 481-5801
     Email: dvelasquez@lathamluna.com

                       About Legacy Pools

Legacy Pools LLC -- https://www.legacypools.com -- is a top custom
pool builder serving Melbourne, Fla., and surrounding cities.

Legacy Pools filed a petition for relief under Subchapter V of
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
22-03123) on Aug. 30, 2022, with between $500,000 and $1 million in
assets and between $1 million and $10 million in liabilities.
Robert Altman has been appointed as Subchapter V trustee.

The Debtor is represented by Daniel A. Velasquez, Esq., at Latham
Luna Eden & Beaudine, LLP.


LM ENDEAVOR: Future Earnings to Fund Plan Payments
--------------------------------------------------
LM Endeavor, LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Texas an Original Disclosure Statement and
accompanying Plan of Reorganization dated October 3, 2022.

LME is a Texas limited liability company operating from El Paso,
Texas since 2018. LME provides drilling and tunneling services to
communications companies for the installation of industrial and
communications cables.

On the Petition Date, LME was indebted to Allegheny Resources, LLC
for a prepetition loan to LME. To secure its loan, Allegheny filed
a UCC-1 Financing Statement with the Texas Secretary of State on
September 18, 2019. Allegheny filed suit in State Court in the
proceeding styled Allegheny Resources, LLC, Plaintiff v. LM
Endeavor, LLC, d/b/a LM Endeavor and Leo Mena, Defendants, Case No.
2020-003180, In the County Court at Law No. 2, Tarrant County,
Texas.

LME filed the Chapter 11 to stay the Post-Judgment Receivership. By
the Petition Date, Allegheny's claim had increased to approximately
$113,000. Upon filing, Allegheny withdrew the receivership, and
commenced negotiations with LME to resolve its claim.

Financial forecasts were prepared by LME based on current data from
operations since the Petition Date. It is projected that monthly
net income will be sufficient to fund the monthly debt and claim
payments.

Class 1 consists of the claim of Allegheny Resources, LLC. Class 1
will be paid under the terms of the Order Granting Motion to
Approve Compromise & Settlement with Allegheny Resources, LLC
Pursuant to Rule 9019(A). As of the date of this Disclosure
Statement, LME is current on its Settlement Payments to Allegheny
Resources, LLC.

Class 2 consists of the claim of De Lage Landen Financial Services.
Class 2 The Secured Claim of De Lage Financial Services in the
amount of $42,530.97 will be paid in 72 monthly installments of
$699.85 commencing on the Effective Date which includes interest at
5.75%.

Class 3 consists of the claim of Meged Funding Group, Corp. Class 3
will be paid under the terms for Class 7, as a General Unsecured
Claim.

Class 4 consists of the claim of Small Business Administration.
Class 4 will be paid under the terms for Class 7, as a General
Unsecured Claim.

Class 5 consists of the claim of Sierra Machinery, Inc. Class 5 has
been paid under the terms of the Order Granting Motion to Approve
Compromise & Settlement with Allegheny Resources, LLC Pursuant to
Rule 9019(A).

Class 6 consists of the claim of Sterling National Bank. The
Secured Claim of De Lage Financial Services in the amount of
$150,149.12 will be paid in 72 monthly installments of $2,470.72
commencing on the Effective Date which includes interest at 5.75%.

Class 7 consists of General Unsecured Claims. Payment Terms to
Class 7 over 84 months with interest at 5.75%. Monthly payments in
the total amount of $507.22 will be made beginning on the Effective
Date with like payments to be on the 15th day of each succeeding
month until the total of $105,000 is paid. All payments will be
shared pro-rata amongst the Class 7 creditors. This Class is
Impaired. Total Unsecured Claims in Class 7 is $249,962.93, while
the total Principal to be Paid to Class 7 is $104,984.59.

Class 8 consists of Equity Interest Holders Class. This Class
consists of the Equity Holder of LME, Leonardo Mena who will retain
his equity interest in LME.

Leonardo Mena has personally guaranteed all of the secured debt.
Pursuant to the terms of the Agreed Orders on the Applications to
Compromise Controversy with Allegheny Resources, LLC and Sierra
Machinery, Inc., his personal guarantees will be released upon
satisfaction of the terms of the payment agreements.

The Plan is based on the future earnings of LME and it will commit
this revenue to funding the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated October 3, 2022,
is available at https://bit.ly/3V4nULD from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Attorneys for the Debtor:

     Carlos A. Miranda, Esq.
     Carlos G. Maldonado, Esq.
     Miranda & Maldonado, PC
     5915 Silver Springs, Bldg. 7
     El Paso, TX 79912
     Telephone: (915) 587-5000
     Facsimile: (915) 587-5001
     Email: cmiranda@eptxlawyers.com
            cmaldonado@eptxlawyers.com

                       About LM Endeavor

LM Endeavor, LLC, filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Texas Case No.
21-30987) on Dec. 27, 2021, listing up to $500,000 in assets and up
to $1 million in liabilities. Leonardo Mena, president, signed the
petition.

Judge H. Christopher Mott oversees the case.

Carlos A. Miranda, Esq., and Carlos G. Maldonado, Esq., at Miranda
& Maldonado, PC serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy attorneys.


MAGELLAN INT'L: Moody's Rates 2022 Education Bonds 'Ba2'
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned an initial Ba2 to Magellan
International School, TX's proposed sale of $46 million in
Education Revenue Bonds (Magellan International School) Series
2022. The bonds will be issued through the Arlington Higher
Education Finance Corporation. The outlook is stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba2 initial rating reflects Magellan's highly leveraged
position with the current issuance eclipsing cash and operating
revenues. While historic cash flow margins do not cover proforma
debt service, the school is actively engaged in a fundraising
campaign, that has shown early success, the proceeds of which will
be used to offset total debt. Further, Magellan plans to expand
into the high school space, and conservative enrollment targets do
produce annual net tuition sufficient to cover O&M and debt
service.

The Ba2 further incorporates the school's modestly-sized budget
that is dependent on tuition, a history of growing enrollment with
expectations for additional students once secondary education is
rolled out in 2023, healthy cash relative to operations, and
seasoned management team. The school is offering a unique product
in the competitive Austin market: an IB education in a Spanish
immersion setting. Governance was a key rating driver in this
initial rating assignment.

RATING OUTLOOK

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the school
will continue to budget conservatively and meet its enrollment
growth targets and fundraising campaign goals, which will produce
sufficient cash flows to meet debt service requirements.  

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OF THE RATING

-- Material increases to the operating budget;
    diversification of revenue streams

-- Enrollment and revenue assumptions on target
    allowing for cash flows necessary to cover
    projected annual debt service coverage by
    at least 1.1x

-- Significant increases to cash reserves

-- Capital campaign receipts in excess of stated
    goals used to bolster cash and/or reduce the
    debt load

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE OF THE RATING

-- Declines in the enrollment and the corresponding
    student-generated charges; inability to generate
    cash flows ensuring at least 1.1x annual debt
    service coverage

-- Capital campaign receipts below stated goals

-- Additional borrowing further leveraging operating
    revenues

LEGAL SECURITY

The proposed series 2022 bonds are secured by all operating and
facility payments relating to the pledged facility, which is the
Bull Creek Campus (the site of the new elementary, middle and high
school). Covenants include a debt service coverage requirement of
1.1x and a liquidity requirement of at least 60 days cash on hand,
both tested annually. Failure to meet either of these covenants
would necessitate the hiring of a consultant. Furthermore, debt
service coverage below 1.0x would constitute an Event of Default.
The school will maintain a cash-funded debt service reserve fund at
MADS ($3 million). Based on projected cash flows relative to
proforma debt, the school is anticipating annual debt service
coverage of at least 1x, but is hopeful that with campaign
receipts, coverage will be greater.

USE OF PROCEEDS

The proceeds of the Series 2022 bonds will be used to purchase and
renovate Bull Creek Campus, capitalize interest and fund a debt
service reserve fund at MADS.

PROFILE

Magellan International School in Austin, TX is a private,
non-profit institution currently offering an IB education in a
Spanish immersion setting for preK to 8th grade. Management plans
to expand into the secondary education (9-12) space in the next 1-2
years. The fiscal 2021 operating revenues totaled approximately $11
million, including $2.2 million in a PPP loan. Fall 2022 enrollment
was 530.  

METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in this rating was Nonprofit
Organizations (Other Than Healthcare and Higher Education)
published in May 2019.


MARINER HEALTH: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an official committee to
represent unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of Mariner
Health Central, Inc. and Parkview Operating Company, LP.

The committee members are:

     1. James Cearley Jr. by and through his Guardian ad Litem,
        Sandra Cearley
        c/o Susan Kang Gordon
        Law Office of Susan Kang Gordon
        21C Orinda Way #162
        Orinda, CA 94563
        Phone: 510-400-6146
        Fax: 510-400-6148
        Email: susan@skg-law.com;

     2. Lisa Cabrera, Individually, as Successor in Interest of
        Louie Sira and as Personal Representative of the Estate of

        Louie Sira
        c/o Jennifer Fiore
        Fiore Achermann
        340 Pine St., Ste. 503
        San Francisco, CA 94104
        Phone: 415-550-0650
        Email: jennifer@theFAfirm.com

     3. Nancy Sanchez, as Successor in Interest and on behalf of
        the estate of Jose Sanchez,
        c/o: Jody C. Moore
        Johnson Moore
        100 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd., Ste. 229
        Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
        Phone: 805-988-3661
        Email: jody@johnson-moore.com;
               joanna@johnson-moore.com;

     4. Ronald Berinstein as Power of Attorney for Margo L.
        c/o Daniel J. Spielfogel
        Law Offices of Daniel J. Spielfogel
        2660 Townsgate Rd., Ste. 600
        Westlake Village, CA 91361
        Phone: 805-373-8907
        Fax: 805-373-8927
        Email: dans@djslaw.com;

     5. Scott Cook
        c/o Karen J. Sloat
        Law Office of Karen J. Sloat
        42-600 Caroline Ct., Ste. 101
        Palm Desert, CA 92211
        Phone: 760-779-1313
        Email: mariaespinoza@karensloatlaw.com
               karen@karensloatlaw.com;

     6. Integra Med Analytics, LLC
        Attn: Matt Byrnes
        1801 Lavaca St., Ste. 101
        Austin, TX 78701
        Phone: 512-900-1332
        Email: matt.byrnes@integramedanalytics.com

     7. Skypower Secure Solutions, Inc.
        Attn: Maryann Okechukwu
        5757 W Century Blvd Ste. 870
        Los Angeles, CA 90045
        Phone: 310-935-5398
        Fax: 213-295-9588
        Email: operations@skypinc.com
  
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                 About Mariner Health Central and
                    Parkview Operating Company

Mariner Health Central, Inc. provides administrative, clinic and
operational support services to skilled nursing facilities,
including the 121-bed facility operated by Parkview Operating
Company, LP.

Mariner and Parkview sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 22-10877) on Sept. 19, 2022. The
Debtors estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and
liabilities of $10 million to $50 million as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Debtors tapped Raines Feldman LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as local Delaware
counsel; and SierraConstellation Partners LLC as Provider of
Additional Personnel to Support CRO.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants
LLC is the claims agent.


MARVIN KELLER: Exclusivity Period Extended to Nov. 18
-----------------------------------------------------
Marvin Keller Trucking, Inc. received court approval to remain in
control of its bankruptcy until Nov. 18.

The ruling by Judge Mary Gorman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of Illinois allows the company to pursue its
own Chapter 11 plan without the threat of a rival plan from
creditors.

The company will use the extension to produce the documents
requested by the official unsecured creditors' committee and
negotiate with the committee before filing a plan.

"Until the document production has been reviewed and [Marvin
Keller] and committee counsel are then able to have a meaningful
conversation about the case, [Marvin Keller] is not able to move
forward with a plan that would be acceptable to the creditors
committee or confirmable," said the company's attorney, Sumner
Bourne, Esq., at Rafool & Bourne, P.C.

                   About Marvin Keller Trucking

Marvin Keller Trucking, Inc. operates a nationwide commercial
trucking operation, with its headquarters located in Sullivan,
Ill.

Marvin Keller Trucking sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. C.D. Ill. Case No. 22-90165) on April 22, 2022. In the
petition filed by Joseph E. Keller, president and chief executive
officer, Marvin Keller Trucking listed up to $10 million in assets
and up to $50 million in liabilities.

Judge Mary P. Gorman oversees the case.

Sumner A. Bourne, Esq., at Rafool & Bourne, PC, is the Debtor's
legal counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 10 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on May 12, 2022. Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath,
LLP and Dundon Advisers, LLC serve as the committee's legal counsel
and financial advisor, respectively.


MATHESON FLIGHT: Exclusivity Period Extended to Nov. 30
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California
extended to Nov. 30 the period during which only Matheson Flight
Extenders, Inc. and Matheson Postal Services, Inc. can file a
Chapter 11 plan.

The court also extended the exclusivity period to solicit votes in
favor of the plan to Jan. 31 next year.

The companies originally sought court approval to remain in control
of their bankruptcy for another six months, arguing that their plan
of reorganization will depend on which of their contracts with the
U.S. Postal Service will continue on a long-term basis.

The official unsecured creditors' committee, however, opposed the
six-month extension, saying it is not necessary since the U.S.
Postal Service may decide in November or December on whether their
contracts will be extended for a longer term.

Matheson Flight and Matheson Postal Services sort and transport
large volumes of mail across the U.S. under certain contracts with
the U.S. Postal Service, the companies' largest customer. In May,
the companies filed for bankruptcy protection primarily to address
significant operating losses under those contracts.

                          About Matheson

Matheson Flight Extenders, Inc. and Matheson Postal Services, Inc.
provide short and long-haul transportation, logistics and ground
handling services. The companies are based in Sacramento, Calif.

Matheson Flight Extenders and Matheson Postal Services sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.
Calif. Case Nos. 22-21148 and 22-21149) on May 5, 2022. On July 14,
2022, Matheson Trucking, Inc., an affiliate, filed for Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. E.D. Calif. Case No. 22-21758). The cases are
jointly administered under Case No. 22-21148.

In the petitions signed by Charles J. Mellor, chief restructuring
officer, the Debtors disclosed up to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities.

Judge Christopher M. Klein oversees the cases.

Nuti Hart, LLP and Development Specialists, Inc. serve as the
Debtors' bankruptcy counsel and financial advisor, respectively.
Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc. is the Debtors' claims, noticing and
solicitation agent, and administrative advisor.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 17 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' cases. The committee is
represented by Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby Pascuzzi & Rios,
LLP.


MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'B+', Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on Maxar
Technologies Inc. to 'B+' from 'B'. At the same time, S&P raised
its issue-level rating on Maxar's first-lien debt to 'B+' from 'B'.
S&P's '3' recovery rating is unchanged.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that the company's
debt to EBITDA will be between 4.0x-4.5x in 2022 and 2023. However,
it notes that any further improvement may be limited by its pursuit
of acquisitions or shareholder returns.

The upgrade reflects Maxar's continued earnings growth. The company
reported a solid increase in the earning from its Earth
Intelligence segment due to its award of a new five-year
Electro-Optical Commercial Layer (EOCL) contract in May, which
bolstered its top line in this high-margin space. The company has
also improved the customer and project diversity in its Space
Infrastructure segment by securing a major proliferated Low Earth
Orbit (pLEO) award. Based on our expectations for annual organic
revenue growth of 3%-5% in 2022 and 2023, combined with EBITDA
margins expanding to the 30%-33% range, S&P anticipates Maxar's
earnings will improve such that its debt to EBITDA declines to the
4.0x-4.5x range in 2022 and 2023.

S&P said, "We now view the launch of Maxar's WorldView-Legion
satellite constellation as less of a risk. Despite continued
delays, the company continues to make progress and we expect it
will launch the first satellite before the end of 2022, with the
second launch occurring approximately two months later. Even if the
launches never takes place, we don't believe Maxar's credit metrics
would be significantly affected over the next few years because it
can fully cover the EOCL contract with its existing assets.

"The improvement in Maxar's credit ratios could be limited due to a
variety of factors. The company's continued elevated capital
expenditure, as well as the working capital outflows related to its
WorldView-Legion and other platform investments, could weaken its
free cash flow in the near term and limit its ability to pay down
additional debt. Also, if its leverage continues to decline, Maxar
could choose to pursue debt-financed strategic acquisitions or
shareholder returns, potentially in the form of dividends or share
repurchases.

"The stable outlook on Maxar reflects our expectation for debt to
EBITDA between 4.0x and 4.5x through 2023. However, we note
management may meet any additional improvements in its credit
metrics with increased acquisitions and shareholder returns."

S&P could lower its rating on Maxar if its debt to EBITDA rises
above 5x and S&P expects it will remain there. This could occur
if:

-- The company fails to keep existing business and win new
contract awards;

-- The improvement in its geostationary (GEO) business stalls and
its Space Infrastructure segment operates at a loss; or

-- Its WorldView-Legion constellation experiences more delays or
more significant issues that lead to increased costs, causing us to
reevaluate the company's competitive position.

S&P could raise its rating on Maxar if its debt to EBITDA declines
below 4x and S&P expects it to remain there for an extended period.
This could occur if:

-- The company wins important new contracts and recompetes;

-- It launches and successfully operates WorldView-Legion;

-- It manages its costs such that its EBITDA continues to expand
organically; and

-- Management commits to maintaining its leverage at this level.

ESG credit indicators: E-2, S-2, G-2



MEGA PHILADELPHIA: Wins Cash Collateral Access on Final Basis
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, Fort
Myers Division, authorized Mega-Philadelphia LLC and M.S.
Acquisitions & Holdings, LLC to use cash collateral on a final
basis in accordance with the Updated Budget, with a 10% variance.

The Debtor is permitted to use cash collateral to pay only their
ordinary and necessary business expenses as set forth on the
Updated Budget. The Debtor believes that the Updated Budget is a
reasonable estimate of reasonable, necessary, and foreseeable
expenses to be incurred in the ordinary course of business in
connection with the operation of its business for the period set
forth in the Updated Budget.

As adequate protection, the Secured Creditors are granted a valid,
perfected and enforceable security interest with the same validity,
to the same extent, and with the same priority as its respective
pre-petition liens.

The Replacement Liens (i) will be in addition to all security
interests, liens and rights of set-off existing in favor of the
Alleged Secured Creditors on the Petition Date; (ii) will be valid,
perfected, enforceable and effective as of the date of the entry of
the Final Order without any further action by the Debtor or the
Alleged Secured Creditors and without the necessity of the
execution, filing or recordation of any financing statements,
security agreements, mortgages or other documents; and (iii) will
secure the payment of indebtedness to the Alleged Secured
Creditors, as the case may be, in an amount equal to the aggregate
cash collateral used or consumed by the Debtor.

The Debtor will also maintain all necessary insurance, including,
without limitation, fire, hazard, flood, comprehensive, public
liability, and workers' compensation as may be currently in effect,
and obtain additional insurance in an amount as is appropriate for
the business in which the Debtor is engaged.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3CoqTWO from
PacerMonitor.com.

                   About Mega-Philadelphia LLC

Mega-Philadelphia LLC is a subsidiary of M.S. Acquisitions and
Holdings. The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 22-00341) on March 25,
2022. In the petition signed by CEO Michael Sciore, the Debtor
disclosed $196,427 in assets and $5,526,926 in liabilities.

Judge Caryl E. Delano oversees the case.

Brett Lieberman, Esq., at Edelboim Lieberman Revah PLLC, is the
Debtor's counsel.



METRO SERVICE: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------------
Metro Service Group, Inc. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Louisiana, for authority to use cash collateral
on an interim basis in accordance with the budget, with a 10%
variance and provide adequate protection.

The Debtor has an immediate need to use cash collateral for the
purpose of meeting necessary expenses incurred in the ordinary
course of its business.

McCormick 101, LLC claims to hold valid, properly perfected liens
on and security interests in the Debtor's cash collateral.

McCormick holds a Uniform Commercial Code security interest on
future receipts and cash of the Debtor. The UCC secures two notes
in favor McCormick. The notes and the UCC and other security
interests in favor of McCormick arise out of loans made by JPMorgan
Chase in 2016. The notes and the ancillary security interests were
acquired by Beltway in April of 2021.

The Debtor's main contract is with the City of New Orleans and
access to cash collateral is necessary to pay the Debtor's
employees, pay for the goods and services necessary to perform
under the contract and other costs incident to the contracts
possessed by the Debtor.  

The City has breached the terms of the contract by underpaying the
Debtor and second by rebidding the Debtor's contract
notwithstanding the term of the contract is through April of 2024.
Without giving the Debtor notice of any default under the contract,
the City has announced it will terminate the contract and the
routes serviced by the Debtor effective November 7, 2022. Prior to
the Petition Date the City transferred routes under the Debtor's
contract to third parties in violation of the terms of the
Contract.

Given that the Secured Creditors may assert liens on the Debtor's
assets, the Debtor proposes to (i) grant replacement liens on
post-petition assets, including post-petition accounts receivable,
having the same respective priority as their respective prepetition
liens to the extent such interests are entitled to adequate
protection against such diminution under the Bankruptcy Code, (ii)
grant super priority liens; and (iii) to make monthly adequate
protection payments in the amount of $110,000.

The security interests granted and the super-priority claims is
subject to a carve out of $75,000 per month for Estate
professionals and the payment of any budgeted item that was unpaid
at the time the Debtor's right to use cash collateral is
terminated. In addition, McCormick notwithstanding it
super-priority claims may not claw back any payment made pursuant
to the approved budget. The Debtor each month will escrow the
$75,000 carve out and the liens and claims granted will not attach
to the escrow.

"Carve-Out" means any and all expenditures authorized or made
pursuant to the Budget, whether or not paid: (i) the unpaid fees
and expenses of the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court and the U.S.
Trustee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1930(a)(6) and 28 U.S.C.
section 156(c), (ii) the reasonable unpaid fees, disbursements,
costs, and expenses incurred by the Debtor's professionals and any
professional retained by any official committee of unsecured
creditors or other similar committee appointed by the Bankruptcy
Court prior to the termination of the use of cash collateral and in
accordance with the Budget.

A copy of the motion is available at https://bit.ly/3CCIzix from
PacerMonitor.com.

                  About Metro Service Group, Inc.

Metro Service Group, Inc. is a multi-faceted corporation with
specific expertise and certifications in the areas of Environmental
Services, Construction/Demolition, and Disaster Response and
Recovery.  Metro Service is a licensed contractor, certified in
building construction; heavy construction; highway, street and
bridge construction; municipal and public works construction, and
solid waste management.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 22-11197) on October 6,
2022. In the petition signed by Jimmie Woods, president, the Debtor
disclosed up to $50 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Meredith S. Grabill oversees the case.

Douglas S. Draper, Esq., at Heller Draper & Horn, LLC, is the
Debtor's counsel.



MIDWEST OVERNITE: Case Summary & 18 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Midwest Overnite, Inc.
        14561 Shirley Street
        Omaha, NE 68144

Business Description: Midwest Overnite, Inc. operates in the
                      general freight trucking industry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 6, 2022

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Nebraska

Case No.: 22-80737

Judge: Hon. Thomas L. Saladino

Debtor's Counsel: Patrick R. Turner, Esq.
                  TURNER LEGAL GROUP, LLC
                  139 S. 144th Street
                  Omaha, NE 68010
                  Tel: 402-690-3675
                  Email: pturner@turnerlegalomaha.com

Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Chris Horn, Sr., as president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 18 unsecured creditors is available for free
at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/YKLI6OY/Midwest_Overnite_Inc__nebke-22-80737__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


MILLENNIUM SERVICES: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 2
-----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida
authorized Millennium Services of Florida, LLC to use cash
collateral in accordance with the budget on an interim basis
through the next hearing on the Motion set for November 2, 2022 at
10 a.m.

The Debtor is permitted to use cash collateral to pay: (a) amounts
expressly authorized by the Court, including rent; and (b) the
current and necessary expenses as determined by the Trustee or his
designee.

The order will immediately terminate in the event the trustee
appointed to the Debtor's case is removed and the Debtor reinstated
as a debtor-in-possession pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section
1185.

As adequate protection, Assurance Mezzanine Fund III, L.P. will
have a perfected post-petition lien against cash collateral to the
same extent and with the same validity and priority as their
respective prepetition liens, without the need to file or execute
any documents as may otherwise be required under applicable
non-bankruptcy law.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3rX1fUh from
PacerMonitor.com.

               About Millennium Services of Florida

Millennium Services of Florida, LLC --
http://www.millenniumservicesfl.com/-- provides residential and
commercial landscaping services.

Millennium Services of Florida filed a petition for relief under
Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla.
Case No. 22-02173) on June 20, 2022, listing up to $1 million in
assets and up to $10 million in liabilities. Robert Altman is the
Subchapter V trustee.

Judge Tiffany P. Geyer oversees the case.



MMC JUICE: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Oct 31
--------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
Eastern Division, authorized MMC Juice Investors, Co. to use cash
collateral on an interim basis, in accordance with the budget,
through October 31, 2022.

The Debtor requires the use of cash collateral to finance its
ongoing post-petition business operations.

Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC has a senior valid blanket lien
upon the assets of the Debtor as of the date of the filing of the
petition herein, and the cash proceeds thereof.  Newtek holds a
senior security interest in all the assets of the Debtor by way of
a valid lien duly filed of which the amount due and owing totals no
less than $260,000.

The other potential other lien holder is the United States Small
Business Administration by reason of its EIDL loan.

In return for the Debtor's continued interim use of cash
collateral, and for any diminution in value of Newtek's interest in
the cash collateral from and after the Petition date, Newtek will
receive an administrative expense claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
Section 507(b).

In further return for the Debtor's continued interim use of cash
collateral, Newtek is granted a replacement lien in substantially
all of the Debtor's assets, including cash collateral equivalents
and the Debtor's cash and accounts receivable, among other
collateral to the extent and validity as held prepetition.

A hearing on the matter is set for November 3, 2022, at 11 a.m.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3RIuyEb from
PacerMonitor.com.

                 About MMC Juice Investors, Co.

MMC Juice Investors, Co. operates a Clean Juice restaurant under a
franchise agreement with Clean Juice Franchise Co. MMC Juice
operates in a shopping center in Naperville, Ill., and has been in
business since 2019.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 22-11403) on October 3,
2022. In the petition signed by Michelle Constantino, president,
the Debtor disclosed up to $500,000 in both assets and
liabilities.

Judge LaShonda A. Hunt oversees the case.

Richard G Larsen, Esq., at SpringerLarsenGreene, LLC, is the
Debtor's counsel.



MORA HOUSE: Case Summary & Two Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Mora House One, LLC
        10718 Mora Drive
        Los Altos, CA 94024

Business Description: Mora House is a Single Asset Real Estate (as
                      defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 7, 2022

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of California

Case No.: 22-50917

Debtor's Counsel: Arasto Farsad, Esq.
                  FARSAD LAW OFFICE, P.C.
                  1625 The Alameda, Suite 525
                  San Jose, CA 95126
                  Tel: 408-641-9966
                  Email: FarsadLaw1@gmail.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Melvin Vaughn as managing member.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/5I6JEXA/Mora_House_One_LLC__canbke-22-50917__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

List of Debtor's Two Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
1. Melvin Vaughn                                         $500,000
10700 Mora Drive
Los Altos, CA 94024

2. Simon Yiu                                             $825,000
c/o Ronald Raymond Rossi, Esq.
1960 The Alameda,
Suite 200
San Jose, CA 95126


MV TRUCKING: Cash Collateral Access, DIP Loan Win Court OK
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Bankruptcy Court District of New
Jersey authorized MV Trucking and Logistics LLC to, among other
things, use cash collateral and obtain postpetition financing from
Commerce Commercial Credit, Inc.

The Debtor argued that an immediate need to obtain credit pursuant
to the Post-Petition Agreements and use cash collateral is critical
in order to enable the Debtor to continue operations, minimize the
disruption of the Debtor as a "going concern," and administer and
to preserve the value of its estate.

On October 30, 2020, Commerce Commercial, as purchaser, and MV
Trucking, as seller, entered into a Factoring Agreement* which
entitled Commerce Commercial to, among other things, purchase MV
Trucking's Accounts arising from MV Trucking's performance of motor
carrier surface freight transportation services provided to its
customers.

The Debtor and Commerce Commercial have been operating under the
Factoring Agreement up to and including the Petition Date. As of
the Petition Date, the Debtor's monetary obligations owed to
Commerce Commercial under the Factoring Agreement are alleged to be
in the aggregate amount of $685,818, which amount excludes fees and
costs of whatever kind or nature, including attorney's fees
Commerce Commercial may be entitled to recover, in accordance with
the Factoring Agreement and the Bankruptcy Code.

Pursuant to the Factoring Agreement, in exchange for purchasing all
of the Debtor's rights, title and interest in and to the Accounts
purchased from the Debtor by Commerce Commercial after the entry of
the Interim Order, Commerce Commercial agreed to pay a "Purchase
Price" to the Debtor.

As permitted by the Factoring Agreement, Commerce Commercial duly
perfected its first priority ownership interest in all of the
Purchased Accounts, as well as its first priority security interest
in the Collateral, including non-Purchased Accounts, by filing a
UCC-1 Financing Statement with the State of New Jersey Department
of Treasury Division of Revenue and Enterprise Services UCC
Section6 on October 30, 2020, which was assigned File No.
54868713.

As previously reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, the
material terms of the Factoring Agreement are:

     a. Pursuant to the Debtor's pro forma Budget prepared by the
Debtor, without any assistance of Commerce Commercial, from the
date of the preliminary hearing until the final hearing the Debtor
contemplates that the Debtor will sell Accounts to Commerce
Commercial in the approximate aggregate amount of $750,000;
however, Commerce Commercial will have sole and exclusive
discretion whether and which Accounts it may purchase from the
Debtor, and to make Advances or overadvances in excess of the
amounts contained in the Debtor's pro forma Budget, without any
adverse or prejudicial consequences to Commerce Commercial's rights
under the Factoring Agreement.

     b. Pursuant to the Factoring Agreement, Commerce Commercial
may buy Accounts from the Debtor by payment of the Purchase Price
at a discount from the face value of each Account as set forth in
Section 2 of the Factoring Agreement and the Schedule A. Commerce
Commercial will make a Purchase Price advance to the Debtor up to
93% of the face amount of each Eligible Account that Commerce
Commercial purchases from the Debtor.

     c. Pursuant to the Factoring Agreement, Commerce Commercial
may make aggregate total advances to the Debtor up to the 'Maximum
Advance* amount of $750,000, and Commerce Commercial may, in its
sole discretion, purchase Accounts from or make overadvances to the
Debtor in accordance with the Factoring Agreement.

     d. Pursuant to Section 3 of the Factoring Agreement, Commerce
Credit is entitled to charge certain Factoring Fees and Finance
Fees in connection with the Purchased Accounts Commerce Commercial
purchases from the Debtor.

Commerce Commercial is the Debtor's first and senior priority
prepetition secured creditor due to the Debtor having granted
Commerce Commercial a senior perfected security interest in, inter
alia. Commerce Commercial asserts a prepetition secured claim
against the Debtor in the amount of $685,818, to which prepetition
and/or post-petition fees, charges, costs, and expenses, including
attorney's fees, as permitted by the Factoring Agreement must be
added.

As adequate protection for the Debtor's use of cash collateral,
Commerce Commercial is granted a post-petition replacement lien on
the Debtor's post-petition assets, junior in priority to the liens
and security interested granted to Commerce Commercial, and only to
the same extent, validity and priority as existed pre-petition and
only to the extent that the Debtor's use of any prepetition assets,
on a post-petition basis results in a decrease in the value of such
entity's interest in the prepetition Collateral.

An Event of Default will occur if the Debtor seeks any amendment,
modification or extension of the Final Order without the prior
written consent of Commerce Commercial, and no such consent will be
implied by any other action, inaction or acquiescence of Commerce
Commercial.

A copy of the order and the Debtor's budget is available at
https://bit.ly/3REltwg from PacerMonitor.com.

The Debtor projects $550,000 in total income and $436,000 in total
expenses.

              About MV Trucking and Logistics, LLC

MV Trucking and Logistics, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 22-16657) on
August 23, 2022. In the petition signed by Laura Gabriella,
managing member, the Debtor disclosed up to $1 million in assets
and up to $10 million in liabilities.

Judge Vincent F. Papalia oversees the case.

Albert A. Ciardi III, Esq., at Ciardi Ciardi and Astin is the
Debtor's counsel.



NATIONAL REALTY: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to Feb. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------
National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC and its affiliates filed a
motion seeking court approval to remain in control of their
bankruptcy until early next year.

In their motion, the companies asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of New Jersey to extend their exclusive right to file
a Chapter 11 plan and solicit votes from creditors to Feb. 2 and
April 3, respectively.

The current exclusive filing and solicitation periods are set to
expire on Oct. 5 and Dec. 4, respectively.

"Given the magnitude and complexity of the issues presented in
these Chapter 11 cases, more time will be needed for the
[companies] to continue developing properties, monetize assets, and
work with key case constituencies to confirm a Chapter 11 plan,"
said the companies' attorney, S. Jason Teele, Esq., at Sills Cummis
& Gross P.C.

                 About National Realty Investment

National Realty Investment Advisors is a luxury-homes developer
based in Secaucus, N.J.

National Realty Investment Advisors and 102 affiliates, including
NRIA Partners Portfolio Fund I, LLC, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Lead Case No.
22-14539) on June 7, 2022.  

In the petition filed by Brian Casey, as independent manager of
NRIA LLC, National Realty Investment Advisors listed up to $50,000
in both assets and debt. NRI Partners Portfolio listed assets
between $50 million and $100 million and liabilities between $500
million and $1 billion.

The cases are assigned to Honorable Bankruptcy Judge John K.
Sherwood.

S. Jason Teele, Esq., at Sills Cummis & Gross P.C., is the Debtors'
counsel.  Omni Agent Solutions is the claims agent.


NB HOTELS: Seeks to Extend Solicitation Period to Nov. 15
---------------------------------------------------------
NB Hotels Dallas, LLC filed a motion with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Texas seeking to approve a stipulation
with RSS MSC2019-L2-TX NHD, LLC to extend the period during which
it has the exclusive right to solicit votes in favor of its
proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

The stipulation extends the solicitation period to Nov. 15 from
Oct. 15, and the hearing to consider approval of the company's
disclosure statement by 30 days.

NB Hotels and RSS, a secured creditor, have agreed to extend both
the solicitation period and the disclosure statement hearing to
allow time for a mediation process that would resolve their dispute
over the amount of RSS' secured claim.

The motion is on the court's calendar for Oct. 12.

                      About NB Hotels Dallas

NB Hotels Dallas, LLC owns and operates the Le Meridien Hotel
Dallas located at 13402 Noel Road, Dallas, Texas.

NB Hotels Dallas sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Texas Case No. 22-30681) on April 18,
2022, with $50 million to $100 million in both assets and
liabilities. Nadir Badruddin, president of NB Hotels Dallas, signed
the petition.

Judge Harlin Dewayne Hale oversees the case.

Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq., at Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney, PLLC is the
Debtor's legal counsel.

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, trustee for Morgan Stanley
Capital Trust 2019-22 for the benefit of the Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificate Holder, as lender, is represented by Bruce
J. Zabarauskas, Esq., at Holland & Knight LLP.

On July 27, 2022, the Debtor filed its proposed Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization and disclosure statement.


NEXTSPORT INC: Wants More Time for Chapter 11 Plan
--------------------------------------------------
Nextsport, Inc. asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of California to extend its exclusive right to file a
Chapter 11 plan to Feb. 15 and solicit acceptances for the plan to
May 30.

Nextsport will use the extension to negotiate the terms of its
bankruptcy plan with the official unsecured creditors' committee,
according to its attorney, Chris Kuhner, Esq., at Kornfield,
Nyberg, Bendes, Kuhner & Little, P.C.

"Having a sufficient number of months of operations in the
bankruptcy is prudent to develop a factual basis to negotiate the
economic terms of a plan," Mr. Kuhner said in a motion filed in
court.  

The exclusivity motion is on the court's calendar for Oct. 19.

                       About Nextsport Inc.

Nextsport Inc. is a company in Oakland, Calif., that designs,
manufactures and sells battery-powered wheeled products.

Nextsport filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Calif. Case
No. 22-40569) on June 13, 2022, with between $10 million and $50
million in both assets and liabilities. David Lee, chief executive
officer, signed the petition.

The case is assigned to Judge William J. Lafferty.

Kornfield, Nyberg, Bendes, Kuhner & Little, P.C. and the Law Office
of Sarah H. Borrey serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel and
special counsel, respectively.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 17 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtor's Chapter 11 case on June 30,
2022. The committee is represented by Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP.


NOAH CORPORATION: Wheeler, et al., Dismissal Bid Partly Approved
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case entitled Homes Development Corp. (HDC), and 1031 Realty
Trust, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Edmund & Wheeler, Inc. ("EWI"), Edmund &
Wheeler Exchange Services, LLC ("EWES"), O'Toole Enterprises, LLC,
John D. Hamrick, Mary O'Toole, Timothy Burger, and Chris Brown,
Defendants, Case No. 21-cv-0633-SM (D.N.H.), Plaintiffs asserted
multiple state law claims that arise from two transactions
facilitated by defendant EWI in 2016 and 2018 -- known as Section
1031 exchanges.  From these transactions, HDC became the largest
investor in both Noah's Birmingham and Noah's Overland Park, having
invested over $5 million in the two enterprises.

The Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendants, while acting as their
'qualified intermediaries' (QI) during the Section 1031 exchange
process, conspired with Utah companies Rockwell Debt Free
Properties, Inc., Rockwell Birmingham LLC, and Rockwell TIC, Inc.
(collectively "Rockwell") and now-defunct event venue operator Noah
Corporation, Noah Operations Hoover, LA, LLC, and Noah Operations
Overland Park, KS, LLC, (collectively "Noah") to sell the
Plaintiffs' real estate interests, while Rockwell and Noah were
using the funds generated from those real estate transactions to
operate an illegitimate Ponzi scheme.

The Plaintiffs believed that the Defendants were actually acting as
"finders and feeders" for Noah and Rockwell, working on Rockwell's
behalf to locate potential investors and convince them to invest in
the properties, in return for Rockwell's payment of commissions and
fees. The Plaintiffs said that Rockwell associates and the
Defendants worked together to induce investors to purchase the
Tenant-in-Common investments at grossly inflated prices. They did
so through misleading representations and material omissions in
packages of sales documents that EWI provided to HDC, as well as in
financial calculations purporting to demonstrate positive rates of
return.

District Judge Steven J. McAuliffe dismissed the following claims:

   (a) All of the Plaintiffs' claims against the Defendants Chris
Brown and EWES for failure to state a claim. The Plaintiffs alleged
only that Brown worked for EWI and no other allegations on actions
taken by Brown that relate in any way to the transactions at issue.
Likewise, the only allegations against EWES are that: (1) EWES
shares officers, or members, with EWI; and (2) EWES shares an
address with EWI, and no other allegations that EWES was involved
in the transactions at issue.

   (b) The Plaintiffs' claims for negligent
hiring/supervision/retention, pointing out that majority of the
"employees" accused of perpetuating the alleged scheme (Mary
O'Toole and John D. Hamrick) are not employees, but principals of
the company.

   (c) The claim for purported violations of the New Hampshire Real
Estate Practice Act, citing a recent case, Lacasse v. Majewski, No.
2019-0646, 2020 WL 2306572, at *1 (N.H. Apr. 2, 2020), the court
affirmed a trial court's decision and noted that N.H. Rev. Stat.
Ann. 331-A:26 "does not create a private cause of action. . . the
legislature intended [RSA chapter 331-A] to have no effect outside
the ethical, licensing, and disciplinary confines of the business.
. . it is meant to guide the Commission in promulgating the various
rules required to effectuate its purpose are entirely directed at
the internal policies and procedures necessary to maintain the
integrity of the real estate business."

Meanwhile, the District Judge denied the Defendants' motion to
dismiss the following claims:

   (a) Negligent misrepresentation. The District Judge noted that
HDC would not have invested in the Rockwell properties in the
absence of defendants' purported misrepresentations concerning,
inter alia, the short-term suitability of the investments, the
expected rate of return, Noah's business model "working perfectly,"
the actual value of the Rockwell properties, and the nature of the
risks relating to the investments.

   (b) Unjust enrichment: The Plaintiffs said that the Defendants
received commissions from the Plaintiffs' purchases of the Rockwell
properties that ranged from approximately $152,000 to $304,000, and
that the Defendants' misrepresentations and omissions were
motivated by the prospect of earning those commissions. Since the
nature and extent of the Defendants' disclosure of those
commissions is a question of fact, the District Judge denied the
motion to dismiss. In addition, the question as to whether the
commissions paid by the sellers were accepted in breach of a
fiduciary duty owed to the Plaintiffs also presents issues of fact.


   (c) Breach of fiduciary duty: The District Court held that the
complaint has alleged sufficient factual basis to state a claim for
breach of fiduciary duty. In their complaint, the Plaintiffs
alleged that as a result of their long-standing business
relationship with the Defendants, they placed their confidence in
the Defendants (who were experts concerning Section 1031 exchanges)
and believed that the Defendants to be acting in the Plaintiffs'
best interests in recommending the Rockwell properties as
investments. The Plaintiffs also said that Defendants had access to
knowledge about the Rockwell investments that the Plaintiffs did
not have (such as information about the financial performance of
Noah), and that defendants breached their fiduciary duties by
"concealing and/or failing to alert" the Plaintiffs to the
misappropriation of funds by Rockwell and Noah from the Rockwell
properties.

   (d) Blue sky violations under the Massachusetts Uniform
Securities Act: The District Judge held that the Plaintiffs have
sufficiently alleged that the Defendants knew, or should have
known, that the purported representations were untrue, and
omissions were material. The Plaintiffs said that the Defendants'
knowledge may be inferred from allegations that defendants had a
close relationship with Noah and Rockwell and had assisted in
preparing documents used to sell the Rockwell properties, as well
as plaintiffs' allegations concerning defendants' representations
regarding their investigations into the strength of the Rockwell
investments.

   (e) Civil conspiracy: The District Judge held that the existence
of an agreement between the Defendants and the Rockwell/Noah
associates -- to engage in a scheme to defraud the Plaintiffs by,
among other things, misrepresenting the value and profitability of
the Rockwell properties, the economic relationship between the
individual Noah event spaces, and the Defendants' receipt of
substantial commissions from Rockwell for the sale of its
properties to plaintiffs under false pretenses -- suggests that
such an agreement is, without regard to suitability, in the pursuit
of mutual monetary gain.

   (f) Violation of N.H. Consumer Protection Act: The District
Judge said that these alleged acts of the Defendants -- acting in
the Plaintiffs' best interests, conspiring to deliberately provide
fraudulent information (and to withhold material information) to
induce the Plaintiffs' purchase of two Rockwell properties, so that
they could receive commissions from Rockwell on the Plaintiffs'
purchase of the properties -- attain "a level of rascality that
would raise an eyebrow of someone inured to the rough and tumble of
the world of commerce."

   (g) Conversion: The Plaintiffs contended that the Defendants
"wrongfully converted a sum of money, capable of being identified,"
which were misappropriated to provide the Defendants' secret
commission, pursuant to the Defendants' scheme with Rockwell. The
complaint specifically states that the E&W Defendants secretly
skimmed off a portion of the Plaintiffs' investment to pay
themselves a commission.

"[D]efendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED in part, and GRANTED in
part, as set forth herein. All of plaintiffs' claims against
defendants EWES and Chris Brown are necessarily dismissed for
failure to state a claim, as are plaintiffs' claims for negligent
hiring/supervision/retention, and for violation of the New
Hampshire Real Estate Practice Act," according to the ruling.

A full-text copy of the Order dated Sept. 29, 2022, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/2gwqr5u6 from Leagle.com.

                     About Noah Corporation

Noah Corporation -- https://www.noahseventvenue.com/ -- offers an
event venue for all of life's events including weddings, corporate
events and special occasions.

Noah Corporation sought voluntary petition under chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D Utah Case No. 19-23840) on May 28, 2019.
Three affiliate also sought bankruptcy protection. In the petition
signed by William James Bowser, president, Noah Corp. estimated $1
million to $10 million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in
liabilities.

The cases are eassigned to Judge Kimball R. Mosier.  

Durham Jones & Pinegar, P.C., is the Debtors' counsel.  Piercy
Bowler Taylor & Kern is the Debtors' accountant.

On June 28, 2019, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  The Committee retained
Stoel Rives LLP, as counsel.


NORRENBERNS FOODS: Creditors to Get Proceeds From Liquidation
-------------------------------------------------------------
Norrenberns Foods, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Illinois a Plan of Reorganization for
Small Business.

The Debtor is an Illinois corporation, and was previously engaged
in the retail grocery business. The Debtor sold substantially all
of its operating assets pursuant to an Order of the Bankruptcy
Court. The Debtor's remaining asset consists of commercial real
estate, and the Debtor is seeking a buyer for that property.

In the past, the Debtor owned and operated a number of grocery
stores in Southern Illinois. Gradually, competition from large
retailers became too great, and the Debtor closed stores. As stores
closed, the Debtor incurred substantially withdrawal liabilities to
union welfare and pension funds. The Debtor's remaining grocery
store in Mascoutah, Illinois, simply could not sustain the
substantial indebtedness associated with withdrawal liability, and
the Debtor sought relief under Chapter 11 for the purpose of
selling the Mascoutah, Illinois store.

The Debtor's efforts were successful, and the Mascoutah store was
sold and the sale closed pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court's
authority. Unfortunately, the sale proceeds, with the exception of
an agreed-upon carve-out of $40,000.00, were paid in Citizen’s
Community Bank. The proceeds from the sale of the remaining real
estate will likewise be paid to Citizen's Community Bank. In short,
the Debtor does not anticipate any funds will be available to
payment to holders of unsecured claims.

The Debtor will have no ongoing operations, and the only payments
anticipated will be to Citizen's Community Bank in partial
satisfaction of Its secured claim. The Debtor will nonetheless
investigate potential avoidance actions, the proceeds of which, if
any, will be available for distribution to administrative claimants
and holders of general unsecured claims.

This Plan of Reorganization proposes to pay creditors of the Debtor
the liquidation of assets.

Class 2 consists of the Secured claims Citizen's Community Bank.
Claimant shall be paid the net proceeds from the sale of the
Debtor's assets, less a carve-out in the sum of $40,000.00. Class 2
is impaired.

Class 3 consists of Non-priority unsecured claims. Debtor does not
anticipate there will be any funds available for payment to holders
of unsecured claims. This Class is impaired.

Class 4 consists of Equity Interests. Holders of equity interests
in the Debtor shall be unaffected by the Plan; however, those
interests will have no value following conclusion of this case.

The Debtor will effectuate the plan by way of liquidation of its
assets.

A full-text copy of the Plan of Reorganization dated October 3,
2022, is available at https://bit.ly/3EIiPTB from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                    About Norrenberns Foods

Norrenberns Foods, Inc., located at 11 Corrington Place, Mascoutah,
IL 62258, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Ill. Case No.
21-30825) on Dec. 7, 2021. Judge Laura K. Grandy oversees the
case.

The Debtor estimated assets in the range of $500,000 to $1 million
and $1 million to $10 million in debt.

The Debtor tapped Steven M. Wallace, Esq., at Goldenberg Heller &
Antognoli, P.C. as counsel.

The petition was signed by Donald T. Norrenberns as president.


NORWICH ROMAN: Exclusivity Period Extended to Nov. 18
-----------------------------------------------------
The Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation obtained a court
order extending its exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan to
Nov. 18 and solicit acceptances from creditors to Jan. 18 next
year.

The ruling by Judge James Tancredi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Connecticut allows Norwich to pursue its own plan
for emerging from Chapter 11 protection without the threat of a
rival plan from creditors.

Norwich will use the extension to continue to engage in mediation
of plan-related issues and negotiate the terms of a consensual
plan.

The mediation was supposed to begin in July or August, however, due
to scheduling and logistical conflicts, it was not able to commence
until Sept. 14.

Norwich is hopeful that one or more additional mediation sessions
will result in a consensual plan of reorganization, according to
its attorney, Patrick Birney, Esq., at Robinson & Cole, LLP.

                 About The Norwich Roman Catholic
                        Diocesan Corporation

The Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation is a nonprofit
corporation that gives endowments to parishes, schools, and other
organizations in the Diocese of Norwich, a Latin Church
ecclesiastical territory or diocese of the Catholic Church in
Connecticut and a small part of New York.

The Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 21-20687) on July 15, 2021.
The Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets against
liabilities of more than $50 million.

Judge James J. Tancredi oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Ice Miller, LLP, Robinson & Cole, LLP and Gellert
Scali Busenkell & Brown, LLC as bankruptcy counsel, Connecticut
counsel and special counsel, respectively. Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC is the claims and noticing agent.

On July 29, 2021, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case.
The committee tapped Zeisler & Zeisler, PC as its legal counsel.


OAKVIEW FARMS: To Seek Plan Confirmation on Oct. 18
---------------------------------------------------
Judge Eduardo V. Rodriguez has entered an order conditionally
approving the Disclosure Statement of Oakview Farms, LLC.

The Bankruptcy Court will conduct an evidentiary hearing in
Courtroom 402, 4th floor, 515 Rusk, Houston, Texas 77002 to
consider final approval of the Disclosure Statement and
confirmation of the Plan on October 18, 2022, at 8:00 a.m.
(prevailing Central Time).

Oct.12, 2022, at 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Central Time), is the
deadline for filing and serving written objections to confirmation
of the Plan or final approval of the Disclosure Statement.

Oct. 12, 2022, at 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Central Time), is the
deadline for filing ballots accepting or rejecting the Plan.

                       About Oakview Farms

Oakview Farms, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 22-31588) on June 7,
2022. At the time of the filing, the Debtor listed as much as $10
million in both assets and liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Eduardo V. Rodriguez.

Susan Tran Adams, Esq., at Tran Singh, LLP is the Debtor's counsel.


OREGON RESEARCH: Seeks Approval to Hire Moss Adams as CPA
---------------------------------------------------------
Oregon Research Institute seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Oregon to employ Moss Adams, LLP as its
accountant.

The services to be rendered by Moss Adams include the preparation
of tax returns and compliance with the Debtor's annual audit
requirements.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Scott Simpson   $600 per hour
     CPA             $195 and $600 per hour
     Non-CPA Staff   $100 and $275 per hour

Scott Simpson, a partner at Moss Adams, disclosed in a court filing
that his firm neither holds nor represents an interest adverse to
the estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Scott Simpson, CPA
     Moss Adams LLP
     975 Oak Street Suite 500
     Eugene, OR 97401
     Phone: (541) 686-1040
     Fax: (541) 686-9673
     Email: scott.simpson@mossadams.com

                  About Oregon Research Institute

Oregon Research Institute is a charitable 501(c) 3 research center
in Springfield, Ore., dedicated entirely to understanding human
behavior and improving the quality of human life. Funded by
research grants from the National Institutes of Health and by the
United States Department of Education, ORI scientists study such
topics as childhood obesity and behavioral problems, ways to
strengthen children's social and academic success, adolescent and
adult depression, promoting health across the age span, preventing
and treating teen substance use and abuse, and understanding and
preventing eating disorders.

Oregon Research Institute filed its voluntary petition for Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. D. Ore. Case No. 22-60978) on July 27, 2022,
listing $1 million to $10 million in assets and $500,000 to $1
million in liabilities. Chris Arthun, director of finance and
administration, signed the petition.

Judge Thomas M. Renn oversees the case.

Loren S. Scott, Esq., at Scott Law Group, LLP and Moss Adams, LLP
serve as the Debtor's legal counsel and accountant, respectively.


PETTERS COMPANY: Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony Partly Granted
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case entitled Douglas A. Kelley, in his capacity as the
Trustee of the BMO Litigation Trust, Plaintiff, v. BMO Harris Bank
N.A., as successor to M&I Marshall and Ilsley Bank, Defendant, Case
No. 19-cv-1756 (WMW), (D. Minn.), Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright for
the District of Minnesota issued an order granting in part the
parties' motion to exclude expert testimony and the parties' motion
for clarification.

Petters Company, Inc., through founder and CEO Thomas J. Petters
and his associates, was engaged in a Ponzi scheme from 1994 and
2008.  Throughout the Ponzi scheme, PCI obtained billions of
dollars from investors through fraud, false pretenses and
misrepresentations about PCI's purported business. Billions of
dollars were wired into and out of PCI's depository account at
National City Bank, which M&I Marshall and Ilsley Bank (M&I)
acquired in July 2001.  BMO Harris is the successor to M&I, and the
claims at issue in this bankruptcy matter pertain to M&I's handling
of PCI's account.

In 2016, the bankruptcy court confirmed PCI's Second Amended Plan
of Chapter 11 Liquidation, which transferred certain assets,
including causes of action, to the BMO Litigation Trust.  The
Trustee subsequently commenced and adversary proceeding alleging
that BMO Harris was complicit in the Ponzi scheme through its
dealings with Petters, PCI and PCI's account.

The Trustee asked the Court to exclude the opinions and testimony
of BMO Harris's banking expert, Charles Grice arguing that: (1) he
offers speculative opinions about the knowledge and state of mind
of others; (2) some of his opinions lack a sufficient factual
basis; and (3) some of his opinions undermine the adverse inference
spoliation sanction imposed against BMO Harris.

The Court will allow Grice to opine about observable documents,
statements, behaviors and other factors that might be relevant to a
jury's determinations about the knowledge or mental state of M&I
and its employees. But the Court will exclude Grice's expert
opinions to the extent that he speculates or directly opines about
the mental state of M&I, its employees or other third parties.

The Trustee also asked the Court to exclude the opinions and
testimony of BMO Harris's damages expert, Karl Jarek, alleging
that: (1) he offers speculative opinions about the knowledge and
state of mind of others; (2) his opinions contradict the rulings in
this case and established law; (3) he is unqualified to testify
about causation and his causation opinions lack a factual basis;
and (4) his opinions undermine the adverse inference spoliation
sanction imposed against BMO Harris.

The Court partly denied Trustee's motion to exclude Jarek's expert
opinions after considering the record which reflects that Jarek has
worked as a forensic accountant for more than 30 years and has
investigated and studied financial misconduct, including Ponzi
schemes. Thus, the Court held that Jarek may not speculate or offer
opinions about the motivations or mental states of individuals or
entities. But the record reflects that Jarek has the qualifications
and experience to offer opinions about the conduct of M&I, its
employees and investors that may be relevant to causation. Also,
the Trustee failed to identify any specific portion of Jarek's
expert reports that contradict the adverse inference spoliation
sanction.

However, the Court granted the Trustee's motion to exclude Jarek's
opinions pertaining to: (1) the knowledge and culpability of PCI's
investors since it is not relevant to the Trustee's claims; (2)
damages reductions based on offsets, deductions and other
recoveries that the Trustee or PCI's creditors have obtained
because his opinions are inconsistent with the collateral-source
rule; and (3) alternative damages opinions based on improper
damages reductions because these opinions are not merely based on
factual disagreements, but instead rely on a flawed legal theory
regarding offsets based on collateral recoveries.

On the other hand, BMO Harris moved to exclude the opinions and
testimony of the Trustee's banking expert, Catherine Ghiglieri
arguing that: (1) she offers speculative opinions about the
knowledge and state of mind of others; (2) she impermissibly opines
about legal issues pertaining to the Bank Secrecy Act; (3) her
opinions impermissibly summarize evidence; and (4) she is not
qualified to testify about M&I's deposit account control agreements
or whether PCI's account activity comported with PCI's purported
business.

The Court granted in part BMO Harris' motion to exclude Ghiglieri's
opinions to the extent that she opines about willful blindness or
the knowledge or mental state of M&I, its employees or PCI's
investors, as well as her opinions about whether M&I violated the
Bank Secrecy Act.

However, the Court disagreed with BMO Harris' argument that
Ghiglieri's opinions improperly summarize evidence and that she is
not qualified to testify about M&I's deposit account control
agreements or whether PCI's account activity was consistent with
PCI's purported business. The Court noted that Ghiglieri's opinions
that reference control deposit agreements and commercial factoring
pertain to her undisputed expertise with banking industry
regulations and her experience as a bank examiner. Thus, the Court
held that Ghiglieri repeatedly applies her decades of banking
industry regulatory experience and knowledge of banking industry
standards to explain the significance of M&I's conduct and other
evidence. The Court said that an expert may summarize technical
evidence and provide an opinion as to whether the summarized
evidence is consistent or inconsistent with alleged conduct.

BMO Harris also moved to exclude the Trustee's damages expert,
Theodore Martens, alleging that his opinions are contrary to
established law, his damages methodology is unreliable and he did
not reliably apply his purported methodology. This was denied by
the Court because BMO Harris has not established that Martens'
damages opinions are contrary to law and based on an unreliable
methodology. Likewise, BMO Harris has not established that Martens
unreliably applied his methodology.

BMO Harris also asked the Court for clarification as to the scope
of, and how the jury will be presented with, the adverse inference
spoliation sanction that the Court previously imposed against BMO
Harris. On the other hand, the Trustee proposed a preliminary
adverse inference jury instruction that would require the jury to
accept as true certain facts underlying the adverse inference
sanction, contending that if such an instruction is given, there
will be no need for either party to present evidence as to the
spoliation issue.

The Court denied the Trustee's cross-motion for a preliminary,
mandatory, non-rebuttable adverse inference jury instruction. But
the Court will provide the jury with a permissive adverse inference
instruction, subject to rebuttal evidence and argument, at the
conclusion of the trial. The Court will also permit both parties to
elicit evidence pertaining to the spoliation issue, but both
parties' spoliation evidence will be subject to reasonable
limitations.

A full-text copy of the Order dated Sept. 29, 2022, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/2gggalal from Leagle.com.

                      About Petters Company

Founded by Tom Petters in 1988, Petters Group Worldwide LLC was a
collection of some 20 companies, most of which make and market
consumer products.  Holdings include Fingerhut (consumer products
via its catalog and Web site), SoniqCast (maker of portable, WiFi
MP3 devices), leading instant film and camera company Polaroid
(purchased for $426 million in 2005), Sun Country
Airlines (acquired in 2006), and Enable Holdings (online
marketplace and auction for consumers and manufacturers' overstock
inventory).

Thomas Petters, the founder and former CEO of Petters Group, was
indicted and a criminal proceeding against him is proceeding in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Mr. Petters and associates allegedly conducted a Ponzi scheme
between 1994 and 2008.  Throughout the Ponzi scheme, PCI obtained
billions of dollars from investors through fraud, false pretenses
and misrepresentations about PCI's purported business.

In United States v. Petters, No. 08-SC-5348 (ADM/JSM), 2008 WL
4614996, at *3 (D. Minn. Oct. 6, 2008), Douglas A Kelley was named
by the district court as the equity receiver for PCI in 2008.

In petitions signed by Mr. Kelley, Petters Company, Petters Group
Worldwide and eight other affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Minn.
Lead Case No. 08-45257) on Oct. 11, 2008. In its petition, Petters
Company estimated its debts at $500 million and $1 billion.  Parent
Petters Group Worldwide estimated its debts at not more than
$50,000.

Petters Aviation, LLC, and affiliates MN Airlines, LLC, doing
business as Sun Country Airlines, Inc., and MN Airline Holdings,
Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Minn.
Case Nos. 08-45136, 08-35197 and 08-35198) on Oct. 6, 2008. Petters
Aviation was a wholly owned unit of Thomas Petters Inc. and owner
of MN Airline Holdings, Sun Country's parent
company.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors was represented by
Fafinski Mark & Johnson, P.A.

Trustee Douglas A. Kelley was represented by Lindquist & Vennum
LLP.

In 2016, the bankruptcy court confirmed PCI's Second Amended Plan
of Chapter 11 Liquidation, which transferred certain assets,
including the causes of action, to the BMO Litigation Trust.


PG&E CORP: Trustee Reaches $117Mil. Deal With Cal. Wildfire Victims
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The PG&E Fire Victim Trust (FVT), created in 2020 pursuant to
PG&E's Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization to compensate the victims
of fires in California from 2015 to 2018, on Sept. 29, 2022,
announced a $117 million settlement of its lawsuit against PG&E's
former officers and directors for damages caused to PG&E in
connection with the North Bay Fires and the Camp Fire.

"It is our hope that in holding PG&E's past officers and directors
accountable in connection with the damage inflicted on thousands of
fire victims in California, the current board and new leadership of
PG&E charts a different course where safety and the protection of
customers is the central operating principle of the company," said
Cathy Yanni, Trustee of the FVT. "We are pleased to see early signs
of a new focus on safety with PG&E's recent announcements about
plans to harden infrastructure and lay power lines underground,
both measures that would significantly reduce fire hazards."

                          The Settlement

In connection with PG&E's emergence from bankruptcy in 2020, PG&E
assigned under its Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization to the FVT the
right to pursue, limited by the availability of certain insurance,
certain claims held by PG&E, including claims against PG&E's former
directors and officers for economic and other harms PG&E suffered
in connection with its role in many California wildfires that
occurred between 2015 and 2018.  After more than a year of
negotiations, and with the case on the eve of trial, a settlement
in principle was reached in May 2022 and ultimately finalized in
July 2022.

"We are extremely pleased with the amount recovered, which at $117
million is one of the largest settlements of its type in the United
States," said Frank M. Pitre, a partner at Cotchett, Pitre and
McCarthy, lead counsel for FVT in this litigation and a member of
the FVT's Trust Oversight Committee. "These funds will be used to
satisfy the vast majority of outstanding fire victim claims held by
certain federal agencies that assisted in battling the fires and
providing assistance to victims. The Trust is required by a
Bankruptcy Court order to use certain settlements to satisfy these
federal agency claims. It was agreed that these federal agency
claims would not be paid from the FVT's cash or stock proceeds.
With the vast majority of this settlement with the federal agencies
satisfied, the Trust is close to being able to use all future net
recoveries from assigned claims to benefit other fire victims."

                      The Fire Victim Trust

The Fire Victim Trust evaluates, administers, processes and
resolves eligible claims arising from the 2015 Butte Fire, 2017
North Bay Fires, and 2018 Camp Fire. Under the direction of the
Trustee and Claims Administrator, the Fire Victim Trust provides an
efficient and equitable process to review claims and compensate
fire victims for both economic and noneconomic damages caused by
these fires, including destruction or damage to real estate and
personal property, additional living expenses, lost wages, business
losses, personal injury or death and related medical expenses, and
emotional distress.  To date, the Fire Victim Trust has disbursed
$4.9 billion to fire victims.  For more information about the Fire
Victim Trust, please visit HTTP://www.firevictimtrust.com/

                      About PG&E Corporation

PG&E Corporation (NYSE: PCG) -- http://www.pgecorp.com/-- is a
Fortune 200 energy-based holding company, headquartered in San
Francisco. It is the parent company of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, an energy company that serves 16 million Californians
across a 70,000-square-mile service area in Northern and Central
California.

PG&E Corporation and its regulated utility subsidiary, Pacific Gas
and Electric Company, faced extraordinary challenges relating to a
series of catastrophic wildfires that occurred in Northern
California in 2017 and 2018. The utility faced an estimated $30
billion in potential liability damages from California's deadliest
wildfires of 2017 and 2018.

On Jan. 29, 2019, PG&E Corp. and its primary operating subsidiary,
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, filed voluntary Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Lead Case No. 19-30088).  As of Sept.
30, 2018, the Debtors, on a consolidated basis, had reported $71.4
billion in assets on a book value basis and $51.7 billion in
liabilities on a book value basis.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP and Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP served
as PG&E's legal counsel, Lazard as its investment banker and
AlixPartners, LLP as the restructuring advisor to PG&E. Prime Clerk
LLC is the claims and noticing agent.

PG&E has appointed James A. Mesterharm, a managing director at
AlixPartners, LLP, and an authorized representative of AP Services,
LLC, to serve as Chief Restructuring Officer. In addition, PG&E
appointed John Boken also a Managing Director at AlixPartners and
an authorized representative of APS, to serve as Deputy Chief
Restructuring Officer.

Morrison & Foerster LLP served as the Debtors' special regulatory
counsel. Munger Tolles & Olson LLP also served as special counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
creditors on Feb. 12, 2019. The Committee retained Milbank LLP as
counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc., as financial advisor; Centerview
Partners LLC as investment banker; and Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC as claims and noticing agent.

On Feb. 15, 2019, the U.S. trustee appointed an official committee
of tort claimants.  The tort claimants' committee is represented by
Baker & Hostetler LLP.

                          *     *     *

PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company announced
July 1, 2020, that PG&E has emerged from Chapter 11, successfully
completing its restructuring process and implementing PG&E's Plan
of Reorganization ("Plan") that was confirmed by the United States
Bankruptcy Court on June 20, 2020.  

For the benefit of fire victims, the Plan provided for a Fire
Victim Trust, which was funded with an oft-stated value of $13.5
billion, to be half in cash and half in new company PG&E common
stock.  The $6.75 billion in cash was paid.  With respect to the
stock consideration, 478 million shares of PG&E stock were
delivered to the Fire Victim Trust in accordance with an agreed-to
formula under the Plan.


PHOENIX HOLDINGS: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to Dec. 19
---------------------------------------------------------------
Phoenix Holdings & Investments, LLC is seeking court approval to
remain in control of its bankruptcy while it awaits the resolution
of two separate lawsuits involving Worthnet Partners, Inc.

In its motion, Phoenix Holdings asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of New York to extend its exclusive right to
file a Chapter 11 plan and solicit acceptances to Dec. 19 to give
the company more time to resolve the lawsuits, which stemmed from
Worthnet's alleged breach of their purchase agreement.

Due to lack of funds, Worthnet allegedly failed to close on the
sale of Phoenix Holdings' residential building in Brooklyn, N.Y.

The lawsuits are both contingencies that Phoenix Holdings must
first resolve before proposing a plan of reorganization. The
companies have agreed to mediation to resolve the lawsuits, which
mediation will likely be complex and time consuming, according to
Phoenix Holdings' attorney, Avrum Rosen, Esq., at the Law Offices
of Avrum J. Rosen, PLLC.

Phoenix Holdings previously obtained a court order extending its
exclusivity periods, which expired on Sept. 20.

The exclusivity motion is on the court's calendar for Oct. 13.

               About Phoenix Holdings & Investments

Phoenix Holdings & Investments, LLC is a Brooklyn, N.Y.-based
company engaged in renting and leasing real estate properties. It
is the fee simple owner of a real property located at 512 Classon
Ave., Brookyln, which is valued at $1.1 million.

Phoenix Holdings & Investments filed its voluntary petition for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 22-40292) on Feb.
18, 2022, listing $1,100,000 in assets and $2,056,355 in
liabilities. On Feb. 22, 2022, the case was transferred to the
appropriate office under Case No. 22-70303. On May 9, 2022, the
case was reassigned from Judge Nancy Hershey Lord to Judge
Elizabeth S. Stong and was assigned a new case number (Case No.
22-40981).

The Law Offices of Avrum J. Rosen, PLLC serves as the Debtor's
legal counsel.


PIPELINE HEALTH SYSTEM: Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
-------------------------------------------------------
Pipeline Health System, LLC, announced Oct. 3, 2022, that it has
filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11 protection of the
United States Bankruptcy Code in the Southern District of Texas.

According to a statement, the Chapter 11 process will provide
Pipeline the flexibility and resources to continue operations and
care for patients as it evaluates and implements purposeful
strategies to enhance efficiency and chart a long-term, sustainable
path forward.

Through these efforts, Pipeline and its hospitals remain open and
focused on helping to ensure access to quality, compassionate care
for the communities served.  

Pipeline Health has seven hospitals in three states, each one
serving diverse underserved communities for decades.  These
hospitals include Weiss Memorial Hospital and West Suburban Medical
Center in Chicago; White Rock Medical Center in Dallas; and four
hospitals in the Los Angeles area – Memorial Hospital of Gardena,
Coast Plaza Hospital, Community Hospital of Huntington Park, and
East Los Angeles Doctors Hospital.

Importantly, Pipeline is taking the necessary steps to ensure that
its obligations to employees continue to be satisfied.  The
hospital system will continue to pay salaries and fees, and
purchase supplies and equipment during this process.  Pipeline has
secured financial commitments to ensure that the health system
continues to operate during the Chapter 11 process.

The decision to restructure Pipeline's operations has been driven
by the significant, industry-wide financial challenges that have
been exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic, including skyrocketing
labor and supply costs, decreased ability to generate revenue, and
delayed payments from various insurance plans for critical patient
care services already delivered.

"We intend for the restructuring process to allow our hospitals to
remain open and operating in their communities, while putting the
hospital system in a more secure and sustainable financial position
going forward," explained Pipeline CEO Andrei Soran.  "Our
employees and physicians across the organization have a long
tradition of caring for patients in their communities, and our goal
is for that care to continue."

Soran continued, "As we move ahead, our patients, team members,
vendors and communities can expect ongoing and transparent updates
on our progress. It's important to know that our patients do not
need to reschedule appointments as a result of today's
announcement."

Pipeline officials emphasized that during the Chapter 11 process
they will continue to pursue all available options to complete the
planned sale of the two Chicago hospitals to Resilience Healthcare
as approved by the Illinois Health Facilities and Services Review
Board on June 7, 2022.

If the buyer is unable to close the sale, Pipeline plans to
undertake a marketing process to identify other potential buyers.

Patients, community members, employees and others with questions
can call 800-764-6401, visit https://dm.epiq11.com/PipelineHealth
or email pipelinehealth@epiqglobal.com for more information.

Organizations or individuals who believe they may have a
prepetition claim or an administrative claim for goods and services
provided to Pipeline Health may need to file a proof of claim with
the Bankruptcy Court to be eligible for payment on their claim.
These individuals can visit Pipeline's detailed claims website at
https://dm.epiq11.com/PipelineHealth for more information.

                       $110M of DIP Financing

Following hard-fought, arm's-length negotiations with the Term Loan
Lenders, the Debtors secured commitments for an approximately $110
million superpriority senior secured debtor-in-possession financing
facility (the "DIP Facility").  The DIP Facility will provide $40
million in new cash for the Debtors and approximately $70 million
to roll up certain prepetition debt of the Term Loan Lenders,
including the Bridge Financing Facility.  This money will provide
the Debtors with necessary liquidity to continue operations to fund
the costs of the chapter 11 process while they work to implement a
comprehensive operational and balance-sheet solution.  The
engagement with, and support from, the Term Loan Lenders with
respect to prepetition liquidity, postpetition financing, and
timing of these cases has been a critical element of the Debtors'
efforts to preserve both value and hospital services for patients.

                     Comprehensive Solution

Pipeline commenced chapter 11 cases with a view toward realizing a
comprehensive operational and balance sheet solution to enable
Pipeline's healthcare network to continue providing vital medical
care to the communities it serves.  The Debtors' contemplated
solution has several components.

First, the Debtors' have filed a value-maximizing chapter 11 plan
that sets forth the terms of a restructuring transaction that will
enable the Debtors to emerge from chapter 11 quickly with a
manageable go-forward balance sheet and greater operational
flexibility, unburdened by costly legacy contracts. Pursuant to the
Plan, the Term Loan Lenders will either receive reorganized equity
or the Debtors' assets through a credit bid. The Debtors are
seeking an expeditious chapter 11 process that appropriately
balances Pipeline's financial and operational restructuring goals,
the health and safety of the Debtors’ patients, and notice and
due process considerations.  Accordingly, the Debtors have also
filed the Scheduling Motion asking the Court to approve a proposed
case schedule that the Debtors believe strikes a balance among
these various considerations, as well as the milestones under the
DIP Facility.

Second, the Debtors' contemplated restructuring solution includes
an active, open marketing process for a value-maximizing sale for
some or all of the Debtors' assets.  To that end, on the Petition
Date, the Debtors have filed a motion asking the Court to approve
the Debtors' Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Approving the Bidding
Procedures, (II) Establishing Related Dates and Deadlines, (III)
Approving the Form and Manner of Notice Thereof, and (IV) Granting
Related Relief for such a sale and certain related dates and
deadlines.  The Bidding Procedures will allow the Debtors
flexibility to market assets in California, Texas, and Illinois to
potential buyers. Consummating the Illinois Sale separately on an
expedited basis would quickly unlock the value of those assets for
Pipeline and unburden its remaining operations, while also allowing
for the integration of the Illinois Facilities into a healthcare
network that can properly support them.  To that end, the Debtors
are continuing to engage in negotiations with the Illinois Buyers
to pursue a path to closing the Illinois Sale inside of chapter 11
as well as engaging with other potential buyers.  As such, the
Debtors are continuing to engage in negotiations with Ramco to
pursue a path to closing the Illinois Sale inside of chapter 11. To
that end, the Debtors are prepared to quickly file a private sale
motion with respect to the Illinois Sale or, in the alternative,
engage in discussions with Ramco regarding the potential to serve
as a stalking horse purchaser.

Third, the Debtors have filed the First Day Motions that ask the
Court to approve, among other things, the Debtors' entry into the
DIP Facility (and related documents) and consensual use of cash
collateral, the Debtors' payment of certain prepetition
obligations, and certain procedural relief.  The relief requested
in the First Day Motions is necessary to avoid immediate and
irreparable harm to the Debtors and their estates, as well as
potential harm to patients at the Debtors’ healthcare facilities.
The relief requested in the First Day Motions would allow Pipeline
to smoothly transition into chapter 11 and provide additional
runway so that the Debtors could pursue a comprehensive solution.

                   About Pipeline Health System

Pipeline Health System LLC -- https://www.pipelinehealth.us -- is
an independent healthcare network proudly delivering quality and
accessible care for the communities it serves.  Headquartered in El
Segundo, California, Pipeline's operations include seven "safety
net" hospitals, three health clinics, and three medical group
centers across California, Texas, and Illinois, with approximately
310 physicians and over 1,150 beds to serve patients, and a
company-wide workforce of over 4,200.  These hospitals include
Weiss Memorial Hospital and West Suburban Medical Center in
Chicago; White Rock Medical Center in Dallas; and four hospitals in
the Los Angeles area - Memorial Hospital of Gardena, Coast Plaza
Hospital, Community Hospital of Huntington Park, and East Los
Angeles Doctors Hospital.

Pipeline Health System LLC and 32 affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead
Case No. 22-90291) on Oct. 2, 2022.  In the petition filed by
Andrei Soran, as authorized signatory, Pipeline Health reported
assets and liabilities between $500 million and $1 billion.

The Hon. David R. Jones is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; JACKSON WALKER LLP as local bankruptcy counsel; ANKURA
CONSULTING GROUP, LLC, as restructuring advisor; and JEFFERIES LLC
as investment banker. EPIQ CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING, LLC, is the
claims agent.


PIPELINE HEALTH: Deerfield DIP Loan Has Interim OK
--------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Houston Division, authorized Pipeline Health Systems, LLC and
affiliates to, among other things, use cash collateral and obtain
postpetition financing.

The Debtors are authorized to borrow an aggregate principal amount
of up to $30 million in DIP Loans from Deerfield Private Design
Fund IV, L.P. and DKLDO IV Trading Subsidiary LP, on an interim
basis, and $40 million in DIP Loans on a final basis.

The Debtors have an immediate need to obtain the DIP Facility and
use cash collateral to, among other things, continue ordinary
course business operations, ensure quality patient care and patient
safety, and preserve and maximize the value of their respective
estates.

The Company, like many other hospital operators, has faced
significant headwinds since 2020, largely because of changing
health trends related to the global COVID-19 pandemic. In the
Company's case, these headwinds have been compounded by various
operational challenges, including reductions or delays in critical
governmental reimbursement payments and other governmental funding,
reduced patient collections, technological and labor
inefficiencies, and high fixed costs related to certain legacy
contractual arrangements.

The DIP Loan Agreement provides for certain milestones related to
the Chapter 11 Cases, including:

     a. The Debtors will commence the Chapter 11 Cases by filing
voluntary petitions under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code with
the Bankruptcy Court no later than October 2, 2022;

     b. No later than the Petition Date, the Debtors will have
filed the First Day Motions, including a motion for approval of the
DIP Facility, which motions will be in form and substance
reasonably acceptable to the Lenders; and

     c. No later than 30 calendar days after the Petition Date, the
Debtors will have delivered to the Lenders a business plan.

The DIP Credit agreement will be in effect through earliest of:

     a. The date that is 35 months after the Petition Date, as such
date may be extended;

     b. The date of consummation of any sale of all or
substantially all Specified Assets pursuant to section 363 of the
Bankruptcy Code;

     c. The Chapter 11 Plan Effective Date;

     d. The Maturity Date;

     e. The occurrence of any Event of Default under the Agreement
or the other Loan Documents;

     f. The date of entry of an order by the Bankruptcy Court
approving (i) a motion seeking conversion or dismissal of any or
all of the Chapter 11 Cases or (ii) a motion seeking the
appointment or election of a trustee, receiver, a responsible
officer or examiner with enlarged powers relating to the operation
of the Debtors' business, or if the Borrower or any Guarantor files
a motion or other pleading seeking such conversion or dismissal
unless otherwise consented to in writing by the Lenders;

     g. The date the Bankruptcy Court orders the conversion of any
Chapter 11 Case to a liquidation pursuant to chapter 7 of the
Bankruptcy Code;

     h. If the Interim DIP Order expires by its terms or is
terminated, unless the Final DIP Order has been entered and become
effective prior thereto; and

     i. The date on which the Loans are accelerated or otherwise
declared (or become) due and payable in accordance with the terms
of the Agreement.

On December 30, 2019, Pipeline Health System, LLC, as guarantor,
Pipeline Health System Holdings, LLC and certain of its
subsidiaries, as borrowers, Alter Domus Products Corp., as
administrative agent, and each of the lenders party thereto,
entered into the Amended and Restated Facility Agreement. Pursuant
to the Guaranty and Security Agreement dated as of January 28,
2019, by and among PHS and its subsidiaries, as borrowers, certain
grantors and guarantors party thereto, and Cortland Products Corp.,
as agent, the Prepetition Term Loan Facility is guaranteed by
Parent and certain of its subsidiaries and any other party that
accedes to the Term Loan Security Agreement, and is secured by a
first priority lien on substantially all of the assets of the
Guarantors, subject to intercreditor agreements.

As of the Petition Date, the unpaid principal amount of the Delayed
Draw Term Loans was approximately $297.66 million. The Prepetition
Term Loan Facility matures on January 28, 2025.

On August 10, 2022, the parties to the Prepetition Term Loan Credit
Agreement entered into the Limited Waiver, Consent and Third
Amendment to Amended and Restated Facility Agreement to the
Prepetition Term Loan Credit Agreement.

Pursuant to the Third Amendment, the Prepetition Term Loan Lenders
agreed to provide the Debtors certain financial accommodations,
including a delayed draw term loan commitment in the aggregate
amount of $20 million, which, pursuant to the Third Amendment, may
be increased by an additional $10 million at the option of the
Prepetition Term Loan Lenders.

On September 26, 2022, the parties to the Prepetition Term Loan
Credit Agreement entered into the Eighth Amendment to Amended and
Restated Facility Agreement, which, among other things, granted the
Debtors access to the Second Delayed Draw Term Loan. In addition,
pursuant to the Eighth Amendment, the accrued but unpaid interest
due on the Prepetition Term Loans or the Delayed Draw Term Loans
was capitalized and added to the principal balance of the
applicable loans.

As of the Petition Date, the unpaid principal amount of the Delayed
Draw Term Loans was approximately $30 million.

On December 30, 2019, certain of the Debtors, as borrowers, Avanti
Hospitals, LLC and certain of its subsidiaries, as guarantors,
Credit Suisse AG, New York Branch, as administrative agent, and
each of the lenders party thereto, entered into the Credit and
Guaranty Agreement. Pursuant to the Security Agreement dated as of
December 30, 2019, by and among the grantors party thereto and
Credit Suisse AG, New York Branch, as agent, the ABL Facility is
guaranteed by Avanti Hospitals, LLC and certain of its subsidiaries
and is secured by a first priority lien on all Collateral of each
of the Grantors under the ABL Security Agreement.

As of the Petition Date, the unpaid principal amount of the ABL
Facility was approximately $29 million.

As adequate protection for the interests of the Prepetition Term
Loan Lenders in the Prepetition Collateral, the Prepetition Lenders
are granted valid, binding, enforceable, and perfected replacement
liens on and security interests in the Prepetition Collateral.

Each Prepetition Secured Party is also granted an allowed
superpriority administrative expense claim under sections 503(b)
and 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code against the applicable Debtors.

The final hearing on the matter is set for October 24, 2022, at 3
p.m.

A copy of the motion is available at https://bit.ly/3CDyfqD from
PacerMonitor.com.

A copy of the order and the Debtor's DIP budget is available at
https://bit.ly/3SVphua from PacerMonitor.com.

The budget provides for total operating disbursements on a weekly
basis, as follows:

     $17.2 million for the week ending October 7, 2022;
     $11.3 million for the week ending October 14, 2022;
     $19.1 million for the week ending October 21, 2022; and
     $16.3 million for the week ending October 28, 2022.

                About Pipeline Health System, LLC

Pipeline Health System, LLC is an independent, community-focused
healthcare network that offers a wide range of medical services to
the communities it serves, including maternity care, cancer
treatment, behavioral health, rehabilitation, general surgery, and
hospice care.  Headquartered in El Segundo, California, Pipeline's
operations include seven safety net hospitals across California,
Texas, and Illinois, with approximately 310 physicians and over
1,150 beds to serve patients, and a company-wide workforce of over
4,200.

The Debtors sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 22-90291) on
October 2, 2022. In the petition signed by Andrei Soran, as
authorized signatory, the Debtor disclosed up to $1 billion in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge David R. Jones oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel, Jackson Waler LLP as local bankruptcy counsel, Ankura
Consulting Group, LLC as restructuring advisor, Jefferies LLC as
financial advisor and investment banker, and Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC as claims and noticing agent.



PIPELINE HEALTH: New Equity or Borrowing to Fund Plan
-----------------------------------------------------
Pipeline Health System, LLC and its Debtor Affiliates filed with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas a
Disclosure Statement for Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization
dated October 3, 2022.

The Company is an independent, community-focused healthcare network
that offers a wide range of medical services to the communities it
serves, including maternity care, cancer treatment, behavioral
health, rehabilitation, general surgery, and hospice care.

The Debtors negotiated with their prepetition Term Loan Lenders to
draw upon substantially all of the $30 million commitment for
additional funding under the Bridge Financing Facility to fund
operations. The collective $30 million in critical pre-filing
liquidity enabled the Debtors to finalize preparations for chapter
11 and avoid a value-destructive crash filing.

The Debtors also explored additional financing options, canvassing
the market and engaging in DIP financing negotiations with the Term
Loan Lenders. Instead, following hard-fought, arm's-length
negotiations with the Term Loan Lenders, the Debtors secured
commitments for an approximately $110 million superpriority senior
secured debtor-in-possession financing facility (the "DIP
Facility").

The DIP Facility will provide $40 million in new cash for the
Debtors and an approximately $70 million roll up of Term Loan
Lenders, including the Bridge Financing Facility. This money will
provide the Debtors with necessary liquidity to continue operations
to fund the costs of the chapter 11 process while they work to
implement a comprehensive operational and balance-sheet solution.
The engagement with, and support from, the Term Loan Lenders with
respect to prepetition liquidity, postpetition financing, and
timing of these cases has been a critical element of the Debtors'
efforts to preserve both value and hospital services for patients.

The Plan places Claims and Interests into various Classes and
specifies the treatment of each Class under the Plan, as
summarized:

     * Class 1 Other Secured Claims: Except to the extent that a
Holder of an Allowed Other Secured Claims agrees in writing to less
favorable treatment, in exchange for the full and final
satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of its Other
Secured Claim, each Holder of an Allowed Other Secured Claim shall
receive, at the option of the applicable Debtor or Reorganized
Debtor (with the consent of the DIP Lenders and Term Loan Lenders):
(i) payment in full in Cash; (ii) Reinstatement of such Claim; or
(iii) such other treatment rendering such Claim Unimpaired.

     * Class 2 Other Priority Claims: Except to the extent that a
Holder of an Allowed Other Priority Claim agrees in writing to less
favorable treatment, in exchange for the full and final
satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of its Other
Priority Claim, each Holder of an Allowed Other Priority Claim
shall receive, at the option of the applicable Debtor or
Reorganized Debtor (with the consent of the DIP Lenders and Term
Loan Lenders) (i) payment in full in Cash; or (ii) such other
treatment rendering such Claim Unimpaired.

     * Class 3 ABL Claims:

       -- (i) If the Equitization Restructuring occurs, except to
the extent that a Holder of an Allowed ABL Claim agrees in writing
to less favorable treatment, in full and final satisfaction,
settlement, release, and discharge of, and in exchange for, each
Allowed ABL Claim, each Holder of an Allowed ABL Claim shall
receive its Pro Rata share of the Exit Facility.

       -- (ii) If an Asset Sale Restructuring occurs, except to the
extent that a Holder of an Allowed ABL Claim agrees to less
favorable treatment, on the Effective Date, in full and final
satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of, and in
exchange for such Allowed ABL Claim, each Holder of an Allowed ABL
Claim shall receive (A) in the event of a Credit Bid Sale that is a
Plan Sale, its Pro Rata share of the Exit Facility; and (B)
otherwise, its Pro Rata share of the Debtors' remaining Cash (if
any) following (I) payment in full in Cash of all Allowed Claims
that are senior to ABL Claims in priority of payment under the
Bankruptcy Code; and (II) the funding of the Professional Fee
Escrow Account and any wind-down reserves as set forth in the Wind
Down Budget.

     * Class 4 Term Loan Claims:

       -- (i) If the Equitization Restructuring occurs, on the
Effective Date, each Holder of an Allowed Term Loan Claim shall
receive its Pro Rata share of the Equitization Term Loan Equity
Pool.

       -- (ii) If the Asset Sale Restructuring occurs, except to
the extent that a Holder of an Allowed Term Loan Claim agrees to
less favorable treatment, on the Effective Date, in full and final
satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of, and in
exchange for such Allowed Term Loan Claim, each Holder of an
Allowed Term Loan Claim shall receive (A) in the event of a Credit
Bid Sale that is a Plan Sale, its Pro Rata share of the Credit Bid
Distributions distributable under the Plan; and (B) otherwise, its
Pro Rata share of the Debtors' remaining Cash (if any) following
(I) payment in full in Cash of all Allowed Claims that are senior
to Term Loan Claims in priority of payment under the Bankruptcy
Code; and (II) the funding of the Professional Fee Escrow Account
and any wind-down reserves as set forth in the Wind-Down Budget.

     * Class 5 General Unsecured Claims:

       -- (i) If the Equitization Restructuring occurs, on the
Effective Date, each General Unsecured Claim shall be discharged
and released, and each Holder of a General Unsecured Claim shall
not receive or retain any distribution, property, or other value on
account of such General Unsecured Claim.

       -- (ii) If the Asset Sale Restructuring occurs, except to
the extent that a Holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim
agrees in writing to less favorable treatment, in full and final
satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of, and in
exchange for, each Allowed General Unsecured Claim, each Holder of
an Allowed General Unsecured Claim shall receive the following
treatment: (A) If the amount of Excess Sale Proceeds is greater
than zero, each Holder an Allowed General Unsecured Claim shall
receive its Pro Rata share of the Excess Sale Proceeds; and (B)
otherwise, each General Unsecured Claim shall be discharged and
released, and each Holder of a General Unsecured Claim shall not
receive or retain any distribution, property, or other value on
account of such General Unsecured Claim.

     * Class 8 (Existing Parent Interests): On the Effective Date,
and without the need for any further corporate or limited liability
company action or approval of any board of directors, board of
managers, members, shareholders or officers of any Debtor or
Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, all Existing Parent Interests
shall be cancelled, released, and extinguished without any
distribution, and will be of no further force or effect, and each
Holder of an Existing Parent Interest shall not receive or retain
any distribution, property, or other value on account of such
Existing Parent Interest.

The Debtors believe that the Plan and the Restructuring
Transactions contemplated thereby provide Holders of Claims and
Holders of Interests with the best available recovery and are
essential to ensure continuity of quality patient care at the
Company's healthcare facilities.

The Debtors shall fund distributions under the Plan pursuant to the
Equitization Restructuring, as applicable, with: (1) the issuance
of the New Common Equity; (2) the issuance of or borrowings under
the Exit Facility and the Takeback Facility (if applicable); and
(3) Cash on hand, as applicable.

The Debtors shall fund distributions under the Plan pursuant to the
Asset Sale Restructuring with, as applicable: (a) Cash on hand; and
(b) Cash or non-Cash consideration received by the Debtors in any
Asset Sale consummated pursuant to the Asset Sale Restructuring.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated October 3, 2022,
is available at https://bit.ly/3Epi7dp from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Proposed Co-Counsel to the Debtors:            

       Steven N. Serajeddini, P.C.
       Zachary R. Manning, Esq.
       KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
       KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
       601 Lexington Avenue
       New York, New York 10022
       Tel: (212) 446-4800
       Fax: (212) 446-4900
       Email: steven.serajeddini@kirkland.com
              zach.manning@kirkland.com

                  - and -

       Jaimie Fedell, Esq.
       KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
       KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
       300 North LaSalle Street
       Chicago, Illinois 60654
       Tel: (312) 862-2000
       Fax: (312) 862-2200
       Email: jaimie.fedell@kirkland.com

Proposed Co-Counsel to the Debtors:            

       Matthew D. Cavenaugh, Esq.
       Kristhy M. Peguero, Esq.
       Veronica A. Polnick, Esq.
       Javier Gonzalez, Esq.
       JACKSON WALKER LLP
       1401 McKinney Street, Suite 1900
       Houston, Texas 77010
       Tel: (713) 752-4200
       Fax: (713) 752-4221
       Email: mcavenaugh@jw.com
              kpeguero@jw.com
              vpolnick@jw.com
              jgonzalez@jw.com

                  About Pipeline Health System

Pipeline Health System, LLC, is an independent, community-focused
healthcare network that offers a wide range of medical services to
the communities it serves, including maternity care, cancer
treatment, behavioral health, rehabilitation, general surgery, and
hospice care.  Headquartered in El Segundo, California,
Pipeline's operations include seven safety net hospitals across
California, Texas, and Illinois, with approximately 310 physicians
and over 1,150 beds to serve patients, and a company-wide workforce
of over 4,200.

Pipeline Health System, LLC, and it affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 22-90291) on Oct. 2, 2022.  In
the petition signed by Andrei Soran, authorized signatory, Pipeline
Health disclosed $500 million to $1 billion in assets and
liabilities.

The Hon. David R. Jones is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; JACKSON WALKER LLP as local bankruptcy counsel; ANKURA
CONSULTING GROUP, LLC as restructuring advisor; and JEFFERIES LLC
as financial advisor and investment banker.  EPIQ CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING, LLC, is the claims agent.


POMMEL MEADOWS: Wants Exclusivity Period Extended to Pursue Sale
----------------------------------------------------------------
Pommel Meadows Hospitality, LLC is seeking court approval to remain
in control of its bankruptcy while it pursues a sale of its hotel
business in Seabrook, Texas.

In its motion, the company asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas to extend its exclusive right to file a
Chapter 11 plan to Dec. 3 and solicit acceptances for the plan to
Feb. 1 next year.

In September, the company requested the bankruptcy court twice to
extend the exclusivity period but the court denied the requests
without prejudice.

The extension will give the company enough time to market the hotel
for sale and then pursue a Chapter 11 liquidating plan, which plan
depends on the sale of the property, according to its attorney,
Paul Hammer, Esq., at Barron and Newburger, PC.

"Once a purchaser is in place, [Pommel] will focus on confirmation
and solicitation of its Chapter 11 plan," Mr. Hammer said in a
motion filed in court.

Pommel hired Hilco Real Estate, LLC, a real estate broker in
Northbrook, Ill., to market the property. The broker set a bid
deadline of Oct. 12 and scheduled an auction for Oct. 19.

The exclusivity motion is on the court's calendar for Oct. 26.

                 About Pommel Meadows Hospitality

Pommel Meadows Hospitality, LLC operates the Best Western Plus
Seabrook Suites located at 5755 Bayport Blvd., Seabrook, Texas. The
hotel, which Pommel Meadows Hospitality acquired in 2018, features
85 rooms with a restaurant on-site, complimentary breakfast, a
cocktail lounge, an outdoor pool, and an exercise facility.

Pommel Meadows Hospitality sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 22-31579) on June
6, 2022, listing as much as $10 million in both assets and
liabilities. Danish Khan, managing member, signed the petition.

Judge Jeffrey P. Norman oversees the case.

Barron and Newburger, PC serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.

The Debtor's lender, DCR Mortgage 10 Sub 3, LLC, is represented by
Daniel J. Ferretti, Esq., at Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell and
Berkowitz.


PRIME SECURITY: Moody's Affirms B1 CFR & Alters Outlook to Positive
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Prime Security Services
Borrower, LLC's ("ADT") B1 corporate family rating, its B1-PD
probability of default rating, and the Ba3 and B3 instrument
ratings assigned to the alarm monitoring company's first- and
second-lien debt, respectively. Moody's also assigned a Ba3
instrument rating to ADT's $600 million, five-year senior secured,
first-lien Term Loan A, the proceeds of which are required to
redeem a portion of ADT's $700 million, 4.125% senior secured notes
due 2023 (issued at The ADT Security Corporation subsidiary level),
which became a current obligation as of June 30th. As a result of
the anticipated near-term liquidity relief provided by the new term
loan, Moody's has changed ADT's speculative grade liquidity
assessment to SGL-2, from SGL-3, reflecting an improved and good
liquidity profile. The outlook at ADT has been changed to positive,
from stable, and a positive outlook has been assigned to
co-borrower The ADT Security Corporation.

Because ADT has addressed the June 2023 maturity of the senior
secured notes (the company anticipates using cash to satisfy the
$100 million balance remaining after Term Loan A proceeds have been
applied), and because private equity influence has been declining
steadily as a result of multiple steps taken by the company,
including the recently announced, $1.2 billion equity investment by
State Farm Insurance, governance considerations are a driver of
today's rating action.

Ratings Assigned:

Issuer: Prime Security Services Borrower, LLC

Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loan due 2027, assigned Ba3 (LGD3)

Ratings Affirmed:

Issuer: Prime Security Services Borrower, LLC

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B1

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B1-PD

Senior Secured 1st Lien Revolving Credit Facility, Affirmed Ba3
(LGD3)

Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loan due 2026, Affirmed Ba3 (LGD3)

Senior Secured 1st Lien Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Ba3
(LGD3)

Senior Secured 2nd Lien Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed B3
(LGD6)

Issuer: The ADT Security Corporation

Senior Secured 1st Lien Regular Bond/Debentures, Affirmed from Ba3
(LGD3)

Upgrades:

Issuer: Prime Security Services Borrower, LLC

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Upgraded to SGL-2 from SGL-3

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Prime Security Services Borrower, LLC

Outlook, Changed to Positive from Stable

Issuer: The ADT Security Corporation

Outlook, Assigned Positive from NOO

RATINGS RATIONALE

ADT's B1 CFR reflects its leading position in the US residential
alarm-monitoring and home automation services market, positive
operating trends including a diversifying revenue base that Moody's
expects will have nearly double-digit percentage growth through
2023, and diminishing influence by private equity ("PE") owners
Apollo Global Management, Inc. ("Apollo"). ADT plans to use
proceeds from the State Farm investment to buy shares held by
Apollo, which had a 67.5% ownership stake in ADT as of December 31,
2021. Depending on how many of its shares Apollo sells, its stake
could drop to as low as 52% as a result of the transaction.
Although the majority-PE ownership structure continues to weigh
ADT's ratings, this most recent divestment provides more evidence
that ADT may be inclined to adopt less aggressive financial
strategies, supporting the positive outlook.

Moody's expects solid revenue growth of roughly 15% in 2022, to
about $6.2 billion, as a result of higher pricing and customers
choosing more interactive services, as well as ADT's push over the
last 18 months to spend heavily on customer acquisitions. In
addition to its purchasing a 15% stake, State Farm will make an
incremental $300 million infusion for product development at ADT.
Coincident with State Farm's investment, minority owner Google,
Inc. ("Google," a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., Aa2 stable) has
agreed to commit an incremental $150 million, also towards product
and technology development that is complementary to the
applications State Farm envisions, such as advances in leak
detection, and carbon monoxide and smoke detection. With State Farm
building upon the existing Google relationship, not only will the
companies help ADT provide more predictive and preventative home
security services, but Moody's also expects that their market
presence will support ADT's sales and marketing efforts and
strengthen customer loyalty. Reducing high levels of attrition is a
key factor for driving greater profitability. A new, fast-growing
solar unit will support revenue growth as well, with the segment
representing about 15% of total revenue this year, although it will
be a drag on earnings initially. Heavy growth spending from 2021
and first-half 2022 will abate, and Moody's anticipates revenue
growth for 2023 to ease to 10% or lower.

Moody's anticipates moderate, steady improvements in operating
metrics over the next 12 to 18 months. In addition to healthy
revenue growth, attrition should ease to about 12.5%, from near 13%
currently, while cost multiples slowly improve as a result of
marketing support from strategic relationships. Leverage measures
should improve, with debt-to-RMR (recurring monthly revenue) easing
from high-20xs currently to about 25x by late 2023, and steady
state free cash flow (SSFCF) as a percentage of debt approaching
double digits, from just under 7% as of June 30, 2022.

All of ADT's debt is secured on either a first- or second-lien
basis. The ratings for the individual debt instruments incorporate
ADT's overall probability of default, reflected in the B1-PD PDR,
and the Loss Given Default assessments for the individual debt
instruments. The Ba3 ratings on ADT's $2.74 billion first-lien term
loan, $575 million first-lien revolver, and $5.5 billion of
first-lien notes are (held collectively at ADT and The ADT Security
Corporation) weakly positioned given the heavy preponderance of
first-lien debt relative to debt subordinated to it ($1.3 billion
of B3-rated second-lien notes) in the company's capital structure.
In the past few years ADT has steadily reduced the amount of debt
subordinated to first-lien debt, resulting in a large preponderance
of debt now being first lien. As there is no longer a sufficient
amount of subordinated debt that formerly had been providing
ratings support or "cushion" for the first-lien debt, the
first-lien debt's credit riskiness has been aligning more closely
with ADT's CFR itself. Thus, the respective one-notch-above- and
two-notches below-differential for the first- and second-lien debt
ratings relative to the CFR reflects the proportion of first-lien
debt versus debt subordinated to it in the capital structure.
However, any incremental first-lien debt issuance or similar
reduction in subordinated debt could lead to ADT's first-lien debt
being downgraded one notch, from Ba3 to B1, in line with the CFR.

The revision of ADT's SGL rating to SGL-2 from SGL-3 reflects the
commitment by its lenders to provide, by March 15, 2023, a $600
million, senior secured first-lien term loan whose proceeds will be
used to pay down a portion of its $700 million senior secured notes
that recently had become a current obligation. The SGL-2 liquidity
assessment reflects the anticipated elimination of that obligation,
modest but growing balance sheet cash, and Moody's expectations for
nearly full availability under ADT's $575 million revolving credit
facility and for roughly $200 million in free cash flow in 2022.
The good liquidity profile also reflects Moody's expectation that
ADT can both curtail its active subscriber acquisition program and
turn to the alarm monitoring industry's robust market for trading
alarm monitoring contacts, to generate additional liquidity, if
necessary.

The positive outlook reflects Moody's anticipation that if ADT's
primary operating metrics -- revenue, attrition, creation
multiples, steady-state-free-cashflow to debt leverage, and
debt/RMR leverage – continue to improve over the next 12 to 18
months while the company adopts more balanced financial strategies,
including an emphasis upon financial leverage reduction rather than
shareholder returns or debt-financed acquisitions, ADT's credit
profile would be improved. Moody's assumes that no dividend
recapitalizations or large, debt-funded acquisitions will be made.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be upgraded if Moody's expects diminishing PE
ownership, if ADT can sustain recent operating momentum and
maintain debt-to-RMR leverage below 30 times, and if Moody's
anticipates that SSFCF as a percentage of debt will hold in the
high-single digits. Moody's would also expect healthy revenue
growth on a diversifying platform, as strategic partnerships with
the likes of Google and State Farm help broaden and deepen ADT's
products' and services' appeal to customers.

The positive outlook indicates that ratings downgrades are unlikely
over the next 12 to 18 months. Over the longer term, however, the
ratings could be downgraded if ADT's debt-to-RMR is sustained above
30x, if SSFCF-to-debt falls toward mid-single-digit percentages, or
if at least mid-single digit percentage revenue growth fails to
materialize over the next 12 to 18 months.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Services published in November 2021.

ADT Inc. (NASDAQ:ADT), headquartered in Boca Raton, FL, is the
largest provider of security, interactive automation and monitoring
services, with about 6.7 million residential (primarily) and
business customers, plus independent security-alarm dealer
customers on a wholesale basis. Moody's expects the company's 2022
total monitoring, services, and equipment-installation revenue to
be about $6.2 billion, a more than 15% increase from 2021.


PROVIDENT GROUP: Moody's Lowers Rating on Sr. Secured Bond to Caa1
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the senior secured bond
rating and funding obligation of Provident Group - EMU Properties
LLC to Caa1 from B3 and has revised the outlook to negative from
ratings under review. The bonds were initially issued by Arizona
Industrial Development Authority, which lent the proceeds to
Provident Group - EMU Properties LLC.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The downgrade to Caa1 reflects an expected 10% enrollment decline
in Fall 2022 that will undermine revenue recovery and further erode
cash on hand. The project expects to be able to cover a modest
shortfall for the November payment from funds in the Debt Service
Reserve. But, debt service coverage is expected to remain very
narrow over the next 6 months, with enrollment unlikely to increase
in Winter 2023 and a higher debt service payment due in May 2023.
The rating action also acknowledges the recent filing of a notice
of default by the senior bond trustee against the borrower, which
exposes the project to acceleration or other remedies. The notice
of default alleges a technical default relating to missed payments
under the Loan Agreement dating from May 2021. The borrower
disputes this and represents that there is no default. The
trustee's notice does not specify how or if the default can be
cured. A continuing event of default that allows the trustee to
pursue remedies adds incremental risk for the project during this
period.

The Caa1 rating reflects the project's significant challenges as
enrollment has declined 25% over the last four years and a higher
share of students are taking courses online versus on-campus. This
has significantly lowered cash flow and eroded liquidity. The
project is increasingly reliant on a recovery in parking activity
to provide revenue to meet expenses and rebuild cash balances, but
Moody's expect this will be pressured going forward by challenging
in-state demographics and a hybrid/on-line offering that impacts
how students and faculty use the campus and purchase parking. The
financial flexibility of the project is significantly constrained
and Moody's do not anticipate any extraordinary support from the
sponsor or the university.

RATING OUTLOOK

The negative outlook reflects significant uncertainty as to the
ultimate level of cash flow to support debt service as student
enrollment and on-campus activity remain challenged. A resurgence
of COVID or health concerns among employees and students could lead
to a reduction or suspension of on-campus activities affecting
parking sales over the next 12-18 months. A materially lower level
of students and faculty/staff at the main campus will provide
insufficient cash flow for the project to cover operating and debt
service expenses, resulting in further pressure on liquidity.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE

Strong and sustained recovery in parking demand that restores
financial metrics and liquidity to 2019 levels

Equity injection, compensation or other actions that improve cash
flow and restore reserves

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE

If there is an expectation that liquidity will be significantly
depleted

Projections following Fall 2022 enrollment show an increasing
likelihood that reserves will be insufficient to cover debt service
requirements

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Generic Project
Finance Methodology published in January 2022.

PROFILE

In January 2018, Eastern Michigan University, MI (EMU) entered into
a concession agreement with Preston Hollow Capital, LLC (PHC),
concerning the operation, maintenance and improvement of the EMU
parking system. Pursuant to an assignment and assumption agreement,
PHC has assigned its right, title and interest in and to the
concession agreement to Provident Group - EMU Properties LLC
("Provident"), a single-member special purpose entity incorporated
in Arizona.

Provident Group - EMU Properties LLC is owned by a sole member,
Provident Resources Group Inc., a Georgia 501(c)(3) non-profit
corporation that is exempt from federal income tax. In exchange for
an upfront payment of $55 million, which was paid in April 2018,
the concession agreement grants Provident the exclusive and
irrevocable right to collect parking fees and to operate and
maintain the parking system for a term of 35 years.

The parking system consists primarily of surface lots located
within a relatively compact, 1.5 square mile area at the main
campus of EMU in Ypsilanti, Michigan. Provident has retained LAZ
Parking Midwest, LLC, as operator pursuant to an operations and
maintenance agreement and LAZ Parking Realty Investors, LLC, as
asset manager pursuant to an asset management agreement.


RACKSPACE TECHNOLOGY: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B-', Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on Rackspace
Technology Global Inc. to 'B-' from 'B'.

S&P said, "We lowered our issue-level rating on the senior secured
debt by two notches to 'B-'. We revised the recovery rating to '3'
from '2', indicating meaningful recovery (50%-70%; rounded estimate
65%) based on our view that in a simulated default, Rackspace
Technology's enterprise value would shrink more than we predicted
earlier.

"We lowered our rating on the senior unsecured debt by one notch to
'CCC+'. The recovery rating remains unchanged at '5'(10%-30%;
rounded estimate: 10%).

"The stable outlook reflects our view that business transition amid
the weaker operating environment will pressure profitability and
raise S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage to high-7x by the end of
2022 and remain elevated over the following year."

Ongoing mix shift in business and the need to invest in growth
continues to pressure gross and EBITDA margins, leading to rising
adjusted leverage. Rackspace Technology's gross margins declined to
high-20% range recently from high-30% range five years ago
primarily due to revenue shift to the managed public cloud services
offerings. While many managed public cloud services offerings have
healthy margins, the company has not experienced this yet due to
its infrastructure resale of managed public cloud which comes at
low margins. Margin pressures also come from high churn as
customers reduce spending in IT-managed hosting and OpenStack in
favor of non-OpenStack public and private cloud environments.
Despite significant operating cost restructuring in 2021 ($162
million of restructuring and transformation expenses), the need to
re-invest the savings will likely constrain EBITDA margins over the
next few years. Growth areas such as cloud migration, its Elastic
Engineering offering (skilled cloud engineers specific to a
customer's cloud environment who can assist with migrations,
optimizations, and other cloud services), cloud native application
development, artificial intelligence and machine learning, and
security services require initial investment cash outlays. However
we note that cloud services is a capital light model and that pay
back periods should be faster than traditional infrastructure heavy
IT investments. As the business model pivots, S&P expects Rackspace
Technology to face more intense competition and do not expect
profitability to return to historical levels.

Although demand for core services remains strong, competition
intensifies in a weak selling environment. In recent years,
Rackspace Technology saw higher bookings in high growth areas such
as managed public cloud services and related application and
security management. But growth rates are much lower those of the
large cloud providers (Amazon, Microsoft, and Google) as many
clients who make the initial shift to the cloud first handle
multicloud environments internally. IDC Corp. estimates that the
managed cloud services market will more than double by 2024 to
become a $101 billion market from $49 billion in 2019, indicating
the value a third-party IT services vendor can bring as the
industry matures. S&P said, "However, we view the competitive
landscape as intense with multiple industry participants all trying
to capture share in the growing cloud market. Providing mission
critical solutions such as Elastic Engineering will increase
switching costs, improve churn, and extend the average life of
clients. As the macroeconomic environment worsens into 2023, we
estimate revenue growth will remain muted, especially as most of
Rackspace Technology's customers are small- and medium-sized
businesses, which face more pressure during a recession."

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our view that business
transition amid a weaker operating environment will pressure
Rackspace Technology's profitability and raise S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted leverage to high-7x by the end of 2022, and
leverage will remain elevated over the following year. We expect
its liquidity to remain adequate such that cash balances and
revolver availability will provide ample credit support."

S&P could raise the rating if:

-- Rackspace Technology stabilizes EBITDA margins and resumes
robust revenue growth such that leverage is maintained under 7x;
and

-- Rackspace Technology sustains free operating cash flow (FOCF)
to debt above 5%.

S&P could lower the rating over the next year if execution missteps
in management's strategy cause it to expect sustained negative FOCF
or financial covenant pressures. This would suggest an
unsustainable capital structure or a liquidity event.

Environmental, Social, and Governance

ESG credit indicators: E-2, S-2, G-3

S&P said, "Governance factors are a moderately negative
consideration in our credit rating analysis of the company, as is
the case for most rated entities owned by private-equity sponsors.
We believe Rackspace Technology's highly leveraged financial risk
profile points to corporate decision-making that prioritizes the
interests of the controlling owners. This also reflects the
generally finite holding periods and a focus on maximizing
shareholder returns."



REVELATIONS IN CHRIST: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Revelations in Christ Ministries
          d/b/a Holy Ground Tiny Homes
          d/b/a Godspeed Garage
          d/b/a Racing for Glory
          d/b/a Mateo's Sub Shop
          d/b/a Holy Ground Real Estate
          d/b/a Revelations in Christ Ministries
          d/b/a Hope for the Poor
          d/b/a Revelations in Christ, LLC
       3697 S. Natches Ct.
       Englewood, CO 80110

Business Description: The Debtor is a tax-exempt religious
                      organization.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 7, 2022

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Colorado

Case No.: 22-13919

Judge: Hon. Joseph G. Rosania Jr.

Debtor's Counsel: Aaron J. Conrardy, Esq.
                  WADSWORTH GARBER WARNER CONRARDY, P.C.
                  2580 West Main Street
                  Suite 200
                  Littleton, CO 80120
                  Tel: 303-296-1999
                  Email: aconrardy@wgwc-law.com

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Matthew Sowash as president.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/OOB652Q/Revelations_in_Christ_Ministries__cobke-22-13919__0007.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/JWIAL5A/Revelations_in_Christ_Ministries__cobke-22-13919__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


REVLON INC: Akin Gump, Boies Update on 2016 Term Lenders
--------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
the law firms of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and Boies
Schiller Flexner LLP submitted a first supplemental verified
statement to disclose an updated list of Ad Hoc Group of Certain
Unaffiliated 2016 Term Loan Lenders in the Chapter 11 cases of
Revlon, Inc., et al. that it is representing.

On July 15, 2022, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP filed the
Verified Statement of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders
Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2019 [Docket No. 205], which listed the
nature and amount of all disclosable economic interests held or
managed by each member of the Ad Hoc Group. Akin Gump and Boies
Schiller Flexner LLP now file this Supplemental Verified Statement
to update the information contained in the Verified Statement.

Akin Gump and BSF represent the Ad Hoc Group in connection with the
Debtors' chapter 11 cases. Akin Gump and BSF do not represent or
purport to represent any other entities in connection with the
Debtors' chapter 11 cases. Akin Gump and BSF do not represent the
Ad Hoc Group as a "committee" and do not undertake to represent the
interests of, and is not a fiduciary for, any creditor, party in
interest, or entity other than the Ad Hoc Group. In addition, the
Ad Hoc Group does not represent or purport to represent any other
entities in connection with the Debtors' chapter 11 cases.

As of October 6, 2022, members of the Ad Hoc Group and their
disclosable economic interests are:

Aegon Asset Management
6300 C Street
Cedar Rapids, IA 52499

* 2016 Term Loans: $10,324,948.07

Allstate Investments
444 W. Lake Street, 45th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606

* 2016 Term Loans: $9,605,225.32

Antara Capital Master Fund LP
55 Hudson Yards
New York, New York 10001

* 2016 Term Loans: $76,408,760.00
* Second Lien BrandCo Facility: $26,597,881.00
* Third Lien BrandCo Facility: $2,980,287.00
* 2024 Unsecured Notes: $130,449,000.00

Bardin Hill Loan Management LLC
299 Park Ave., 24th Floor
New York, NY 10171

* 2016 Term Loans: $33,405,163.02

Benefit Street Partners
9 West 57th Street, Suite 4920
New York, NY 10019

* 2016 Term Loans: $14,318,353.00

Brigade Capital Management
399 Park Avenue, 16th Floor
New York, NY, 10022

* 2016 Term Loans: $173,744,217.01

CastleKnight Management LP
810 Seventh Avenue, Suite 803
New York, NY 10019

* 2016 Term Loans: $34,888,893.97
* Second Lien BrandCo Facility: $5,000,000.00
* 2024 Unsecured Notes: $2,500,000.00

Corre Partners Management, LLC
12 East 49th Street 40th Floor
New York, NY 10017

* 2016 Term Loans: $32,371,386.41
* ABL FILO Term Loans: $8,397,218.35
* Second Lien BrandCo Facility: $12,469,869.23
* 2024 Unsecured Notes: $75,703,000.00

Ellington Management Group
711 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10017

* 2016 Term Loans: $6,837,209.00

Greywolf Loan Management LP
4 Manhattanville Road, Suite 201
Purchase, NY 10577

* 2016 Term Loans: $15,630,681.74

HPS Investment Partners
40 West 57th Street, 33rd Floor
New York, NY 10019

* 2016 Term Loans: $131,564,098.88

Livello Capital Management
1 World Trade Center, 85th Floor
New York, NY 10007

* 2016 Term Loans: $6,968,445.00

Medalist Partners Corporate Finance, LLC
8000 Avalon Blvd, Suite 460
Alpharetta, GA 30009

* 2016 Term Loans: $2,591,475.20

MJX Asset Management
12 East 49th Street 38th Floor
New York, NY 10017

* 2016 Term Loans: $9,478,600.30

New Generation Advisors, LLC
13 Elm Street, Suite 2
Manchester, MA 001944

* 2016 Term Loans: $2,735,788.00

Nuveen Asset Management, LLC
730 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10017

* 2016 Term Loans: $109,673,303.59

Octagon Credit Investors, LLC
250 Park Avenue, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10177

* 2016 Term Loans: $5,430,704.00

ZAIS Group, LLC
101 Crawfords Corner Road
Suite 1206
Holmdel, New Jersey 07733

* 2016 Term Loans: $14,601,840.72

Counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of Certain Unaffiliated 2016 Term Loan
Lenders can be reached at:

          AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
          James Savin, Esq.
          2001 K Street, N.W.
          Washington, D.C. 20006
          Telephone: (202) 887-4000
          Facsimile: (202) 887-4288
          E-mail: jsavin@akingump.com

          Abid Qureshi, Esq.
          Joseph L. Sorkin, Esq.
          Kevin Zuzolo, Esq.
          One Bryant Park
          New York, NY 10036
          Telephone: (212) 872-1000
          Facsimile: (212) 872-1002
          E-mail: mstamer@akingump.com
                  aqureshi@akingump.com
                  jsorkin@akingump.com

             - and -

          BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
          Matthew L. Schwartz, Esq.
          Eric J. Brenner, Esq.
          55 Hudson Yards
          New York, NY 10001
          Telephone: (212) 446-2300
          Facsimile: (212) 446-2350
          E-mail: mlschwartz@bsfllp.com
                  ebrenner@bsfllp.com

          Marc V. Ayala, Esq.
          Andrew P. Steinmetz, Esq.
          Alexander J. Law, Esq.
          333 Main Street
          Armonk, NY 10504
          Telephone: (914) 749-8400
          E-mail: mayala@bsfllp.com
                  asteinmetz@bsfllp.com
                  alaw@bsfllp.com   

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing is available at
https://bit.ly/3MhGfRd at no extra charge.

                         About Revlon Inc.

Revlon Inc. manufactures, markets and sells an extensive array of
beauty and personal care products worldwide, including color
cosmetics; fragrances; skin care; hair color, hair care and hair
treatments; beauty tools; men's grooming products; anti-perspirant
deodorants; and other beauty care products.  Today, Revlon's
diversified portfolio of brands is sold in approximately 150
countries around the world in most retail distribution channels,
including prestige, salon, mass, and online.

Since its breakthrough launch of the first opaque nail enamel in
1932, Revlon has provided consumers with high-quality product
innovation, performance and sophisticated glamour.  In 2016, Revlon
acquired the iconic Elizabeth Arden company and its portfolio of
brands, including its leading designer, heritage and celebrity
fragrances.

Revlon is among the leading global beauty companies, with some of
the world's most iconic and desired brands and product offerings in
color cosmetics, skin care, hair color, hair care and fragrances
under brands such as Revlon, Revlon Professional, Elizabeth Arden,
Almay, Mitchum, CND, American Crew, Creme of Nature, Cutex, Juicy
Couture, Elizabeth Taylor, Britney Spears, Curve, John Varvatos,
Christina Aguilera and AllSaints.

Revlon, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case
No. 22-10760) on June 15, 2022.  Fifty affiliates, including Almay,
Inc, Beautyge Brands USA, Inc., and Elizabeth Arden, Inc., also
sought bankruptcy protection on June 15 and June 16, 2022.

Revlon disclosed total assets of $2,328,093,000 against total
liabilities of $3,689,240,395 as of April 30, 2022.

The Hon. David S. Jones is the case judge.

PJT Partners is acting as financial advisor to Revlon and Alvarez &
Marsal is acting as restructuring advisor.  Paul, Weiss, Rifkind,
Wharton & Garrison LLP is acting as legal advisor to the Company.
Mololamken, LLC, is the conflicts counsel.  Kroll, LLC, is the
claims agent.


RICHMOND HOSPITALITY: Wants More Time for Chapter 11 Plan
---------------------------------------------------------
Richmond Hospitality, LLC filed a motion seeking court approval to
remain in control of its bankruptcy until early next year.

In its motion, the company asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of New York to extend its exclusive right to file
a Chapter 11 plan and solicit votes from creditors to Jan. 13 and
March 14, respectively.

"[Richmond Hospitality] requires additional time to deliberate upon
and formulate its course of action in order to implement the most
sensible plan of reorganization, and allow the case and critical
aspects thereof to further develop," said the company's attorney,
Adam Wofs, Esq., at LaMonica Herbst & Maniscalco, LLP.

"The plan may involve a sale of the lease or project, or
debtor-in-possession financing, which will allow [Richmond
Hospitality] to complete the project and emerge as a successful
going concern," the attorney said.

Richmond Hospitality also has valuable lawsuits seeking substantial
money damages against multiple defendants, which will also form a
critical component of its plan and maximize the recovery for the
benefit of the company's estate and creditors, according to Mr.
Wofs.

The motion is on the court's calendar for Oct. 12.

                     About Richmond Hospitality

Richmond Hospitality, LLC is a real estate hotel development owner
and operator that was poised to develop an 80-room Best Western
Vibe hotel in Staten Island.

Richmond Hospitality filed its voluntary petition under Chapter 7
of the Bankruptcy Code on March 16, 2022. On May 18, 2022, the
court ordered the conversion of the case to one under Chapter 11
(Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 22-40507). At the time of the filing, the
Debtor listed $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.

Judge Jil Mazer-Marino presides over the case.

Joseph S. Maniscalco, Esq., at LaMonica Herbst & Maniscalco, LLP
and Stuart R. Berg, P.C. serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel
and special litigation counsel, respectively.


RL ENTERPRISES: Seeks to Hire Johnson & Gubler as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
RL Enterprises, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Nevada to hire Johnson & Gubler, P.C. as its
legal counsel.

The firm's services include:

     1. instituting, prosecuting or defending any lawsuits,
adversary proceedings or contested matters arising out of the
Debtor's bankruptcy proceeding in which the Debtor may be a party;


     2. assisting in the recovery and obtaining necessary court
approval for recovery and liquidation of estate assets;

     3. assisting in determining the priorities and status of
claims and filing objections where necessary;

     4. preparing a disclosure statement and plan of
reorganization; and

     5. performing all other necessary legal services for the
Debtor.

Johnson & Gubler will be paid at these rates:

     Attorneys      $450 per hour
     Paralegals     $175 per hour

The firm received a retainer of $11,738, of which $1,738 was used
to pay the filing fee, and another $3,685 for pre-bankruptcy
services.

Matthew Johnson, Esq., the firm's attorney who will be handling the
case, neither holds nor represents any interest adverse to the
Debtor's bankruptcy estate, as disclosed in court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Matthew L. Johnson, Esq.
     Russell G. Gubler, Esq.
     Johnson & Gubler, P.C.
     8831 West Sahara Avenue
     Las Vegas, NV 89117
     Tel: (702) 471-0065
     Fax: (702) 471-0075
     Email: mjohnson@mjohnsonlaw.com

                        About RL Enterprises

RL Enterprises, Inc. offers customized training programs that
generate results to improve employee skill sets. The company is
based in Costa Mesa, Calif.

RL Enterprises sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 22-13254) on Sept. 11,
2022, with between $1 million and $10 million in both assets and
liabilities. Roman Libonao, president of RL Enterprises, signed the
petition.

Judge August B. Landis oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by Matthew L. Johnson, Esq., and Russell
G. Gubler, Esq., at Johnson & Gubler, P.C.


RUSSIAN MEDIA: TD Bank in Talks on Treatment of Claim
-----------------------------------------------------
TD Bank, N.A., filed an amended reservation of Rights to the
adequacy of the Disclosure Statement proposed by the Russian Media
Group, LLC d/b/a RTN-WMNB.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor entered into a Promissory
Note dated March 30, 2017 with Lender (the "Note"), whereby the
Lender loaned the principal sum of $85,000 to the Debtor, which
obligation was evidenced by a Business Loan Agreement dated March
30, 2017 (the "BLA") and secured pursuant to, inter alia, a
Commercial Security Agreement dated March 30, 2017.  The Security
Agreement, among other things, granted to the Lender a security
interest in all of the Debtor's assets.  

On July 20, 2021, the Lender filed its secured proof of claim in
the instant bankruptcy case in the sum of $35,116 plus interest,
costs, fees, attorneys' fees and other charges pursuant to the Loan
Documents, designated by the Clerk of the Court as Claim No. 2.

As set forth in the Interim Cash Collateral Order, as of the
Petition Date, the Debtor acknowledged and agreed that the Debtor
owes the Lender not less than the amount of $35,116 plus interest,
costs, fees, attorneys' fees and other charges pursuant to the Loan
Documents which continue to accrue, and the Debtor acknowledged
that the Claim constitutes an allowed claim against the Debtor's
estate subject to s 506(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, not subject to
any offset, claim or defense by the Debtor.

A hearing on the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement was scheduled
to be held on October 6, 2022.

The Debtor and Lender have been negotiating in good faith with
respect to the treatment of Lender's Claim in the instant
bankruptcy case. Counsel for the Lender has advised Debtor's
counsel of Lender's objection to the current treatment of the Claim
and has provided Counsel comments to resolve the objection which
will require the Debtor to amend the Disclosure Statement. The
Lender believes that the Debtor and Lender will come to an amicable
resolution of the treatment of the Claim, however, out of abundance
of caution, Lender reserves all its rights to raise any objections
it has to the Disclosure Statement at the hearing on the adequacy
of the Disclosure Statement.

Attorneys for TD Bank, N.A.:
     
     Teresa Sadutto-Carley, Esq.
     PLATZER, SWERGOLD, GOLDBERG, KATZ & JASLOW, LLP
     475 Park Avenue South - 18th Floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Telephone: (212) 593-3000
     Facsimile: (212) 593-0353
     E-mail: tsadutto@platzerlaw.com

                  About Russian Media Group

Russian Media Group, LLC, a Brooklyn, N.Y.-based company doing
business as TRN-WMNB, filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
E.D.N.Y. Case No. 21-41741) on July 1, 2021, listing $625,956 in
assets and $1,532,402 in liabilities. Sam Katsman, vice-president
of Russian Media Group, signed the petition.

Judge Elizabeth S. Stong oversees the case.

The Law Offices of Alla Kachan, P.C. and Wisdom Professional
Services Inc. serve as the Debtor's legal counsel and accountant,
respectively.


RYAN ENVIRONMENTAL: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 4 disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Ryan Environmental, LLC.
  
                     About Ryan Environmental

Ryan Environmental, LLC, a company in Bridgeport, W.Va., offers
environmental consulting, remediation, cleaning services, emergency
spill response, hydrocarbon lab services, corrosion services, well
services, general roustabout, and both steel and poly pipeline
construction.
  
Ryan Environmental sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Va. Case No. 22-00216) on May 5, 2022,
with between $1 million and $10 million in assets and between $10
million and $50 million in liabilities. Judge David L. Bissett
oversees the case.

Martin P. Sheehan, Esq., at Sheehan & Associates, PLLC is the
Debtor's legal counsel.


SAVVA'S RESTAURANT: Exclusivity Period Extended to Oct. 30
----------------------------------------------------------
Savva's Restaurant, Inc. obtained a court order extending its
exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan and solicit acceptances
from creditors to Oct. 30 and Dec. 29, respectively.

The ruling by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
New York allows the company to pursue its own plan without the
threat of a competing plan from creditors while it awaits the
outcome of the insurance litigation involving KB Insurance Co.,
Ltd.

Savva's and its mortgagee, TD Bank, N.A., filed the litigation to
recover insurance claims for damage to property. The litigation is
pending before the bankruptcy court.

The outcome of the insurance litigation (which, depending on the
amount realized via the sale of Savva's' real property in Westbury,
N.Y., may constitute the primary component for paying holders of
claims other than TD Bank) remains an unresolved contingency,
according to the company's motion filed in court.

                     About Savva's Restaurant

Savva's Restaurant, Inc., doing business as Harvest Diner, filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 22-70382) on March 4, 2022, with
$5,625,000 in assets and $2,485,720 in liabilities. Kyriacos Savva,
president of Savva's Restaurant, signed the petition.

Judge Robert E. Grossman oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Pryor & Mandelup, LLP as bankruptcy counsel;
Lambrou Law Firm, P.C. as special counsel; and Prager Metis CPAs,
LLC as accountant.

The Debtor filed its proposed Chapter 11 plan of liquidation on May
20, 2022.


SHOPS AT BROAD: Court OKs Cash Collateral Use Thru Oct 31
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort
Worth Division, authorized Shops at Broad, LLC to use the cash
collateral of Trez Shops at Broad LP on an interim basis in
accordance with the budget through October 31, 2022.

The Debtor is permitted to use the Trez Cash Collateral to pay its
reasonable and necessary operating expenses in accordance with the
budget. In addition, pre-petition claims may not be paid unless and
until a separate order is entered authorizing the payment.

As adequate protection, the cash will be used to continue the
operations of the Debtor's business and to maintain insurance on
the Debtor's property.

To the extent there is any diminution in the value of Trez's
interests in the Debtor's property or estate by virtue of the use
of cash collateral, Trez is granted:

     -- an adequate protection lien in all property of the Debtor
and the estate of the same nature as set forth within the deed of
trust lien documents, plus a lien in any unearned premiums that may
arise on account of the insurance that is acquired. The Trez
adequate protection lien granted will not cover causes of action
governed by Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code.

     -- a first priority administrative expense claim to the extent
of such diminution.

A final hearing on the matter is set for October 27 at 9:30 a.m.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3RIxjFF from
PacerMonitor.com.

A copy of the budget is available at https://bit.ly/3ebBWKT from
PacerMonitor.com.

The Debtor projects $196,004 in total rental income and $142,160 in
total expenses for October 2022.

                     About Shops at Broad LLC

Shops at Broad LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 22-42059) on Sept. 2,
2022.  In its petition, the Debtor reported assets and liabilities
between $50 million and $100 million.  

The Debtor is represented by Areya Holder, Esq., at Holder Law, as
counsel.



SMART AND SASSY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Smart and Sassy, LLC
          d/b/a Smartass and Sass
        800 P St
        Ste 300
        Lincoln, NE 68508-1481

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 6, 2022

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Nebraska

Case No.: 22-40874

Judge: Hon. Thomas L. Saladino

Debtor's Counsel: John A. Lentz, Esq.
                  LENTZ LAW, PC, LLO
                  650 J St Ste 215B
                  Lincoln, NE 68508-2900
                  Tel: (402) 421-9676
                  Email: john@johnlentz.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Abigail Bartholomew as authorized
signer.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/SYHTMBQ/Smart_and_Sassy_LLC__nebke-22-40874__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


SPIRIT AIRLINES: Moody's Affirms B1 CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed its B1 corporate family rating
and B1-PD probability of default rating of Spirit Airlines, Inc.
("Spirit"). Moody's also affirmed the Ba2 senior secured rating
assigned to Spirit IP Cayman Ltd.'s 8% senior notes secured by its
loyalty program ("Notes"). Moody's downgraded the speculative grade
liquidity rating ("SGL") to SGL-2 from SGL-1 and changed the
ratings outlook to stable from positive.

"Changing the outlook to stable reflects the delays in restoring
operating metrics towards pre-pandemic levels that Spirit will
realize because of higher costs and constraints in the commercial
aviation ecosystem," said Moody's Lead Analyst, Jonathan Root.
Spirit will continue to grow its capacity more than any other US
airline relative to its pre-pandemic level in upcoming years.
However, the constraints in the industry, including the amount of
capacity that can flow through the US Federal Aviation
Administration's Jacksonville Florida Air Route Control Center,
will cause the company's operations to remain sub-optimal until
they are relieved. About 35% of Spirit's daily flights pass through
the Jacksonville control center.

The affirmation of the B1 corporate family rating reflects Moody's
expectation that credit metrics will strengthen, albeit at a slower
pace than it expected heading into 2022.

The downgrade of the speculative grade liquidity rating to SGL-2
reflects lower expected free cash flow due to the operating
challenges discussed above and higher fuel costs. Moody's now
expects free cash flow to be negative in 2022, but it will be
positive in 2023 despite investments in capacity. However,
amortization on term loans will likely exceed free cash flow in
2023. Nonetheless, Moody's expects cash to remain above $850
million. The company has an undrawn $240 million revolver that
expires in March 2024.

Affirmations:

Issuer: Spirit Airlines, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B1

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B1-PD

Issuer: Spirit IP Cayman Ltd.

Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Ba2 (LGD2)

Downgrades:

Issuer: Spirit Airlines, Inc.

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Downgraded to SGL-2 from
SGL-1

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Spirit Airlines, Inc.

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Positive

Issuer: Spirit IP Cayman Ltd.

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Positive

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B1 corporate family rating reflects Spirit's solid market
position as a leading low-cost provider of passenger air
transportation in the US domestic market and its good liquidity.
The rating also reflects the expectation that the company will
maintain its historically conservative financial policy, with no
dividends or share repurchases. Additionally, reducing financial
leverage will remain a priority. Moody's expects debt/EBITDA to dip
below six times by the end of 2023, with an additional decline of
at least one time through 2024. The B1 rating is constrained by the
potential for leverage to remain higher than Moody's projections if
the company chooses to debt-fund or lease all deliveries of new
aircraft in upcoming years. Additionally, there is the potential
for pressure on margins and operating cash flow, if fares do not
sufficiently cover fuel, labor and other costs.

There is also execution risk around maintaining its operating
margins as it enters new markets or increases service on existing
routes.

The ratings are based on Spirit Airlines as a stand-alone company.
The ratings do not consider any impacts of merging with JetBlue.
The agreed merger remains subject to Spirit shareholder (October
2022) and the US Department of Justice (Q4 2023 or later) approval.
Merging with JetBlue would be a credit positive for Spirit and
strengthen its credit profile relative to it remaining a standalone
company.

The Ba2 rating on the Notes reflects the strategic importance of
the Spirit brand and related intellectual property ("IP") to the
company and the benefits of the loyalty program to Spirit's
day-to-day operations and cash flows. These positives are balanced
by an expected relatively low recovery if the collateral ever
needed to be monetized to pay off the Notes. The Ba2 Notes rating
results from a one-notch positive override to the LGD model
reflecting Moody's opinion that the importance of the collateral to
the company's daily operations lowers the probability of default of
the notes relative to that of the company's other secured debt.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be upgraded if Moody's expects debt-to-EBITDA to
approach 4x and funds from operations + interest-to-interest to be
above 3.5x. The ratings could be downgraded if liquidity weakens,
with cash and short-term investments being sustained below $800
million or if debt-to-EBITDA will be sustained above 5.5x beyond
2023.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Passenger
Airlines published in August 2021.

Spirit Airlines, Inc., headquartered in Miramar, Florida, is a
leading low-cost US airline providing service to destinations
throughout the US, Latin America and the Caribbean. The company's
fleet numbered 180 aircraft on June 30, 2022. Revenue was $4.2
billion for the twelve months ended June 30, 2022.  


SPRING MOUNTAIN: Napa Vineyard Files for Chapter 11 Protection
--------------------------------------------------------------
Spring Mountain Vineyard Inc. filed for chapter 11 protection in
the Northern District of California.

Since 1992, the Debtor has owned the Spring Mountain Vineyard in
Napa County, California.  The Vineyard is the primary asset of the
Debtor, an ongoing business with 70 employees, millions of dollars
in annual sales, and relationships with dozens of suppliers and
thousands of customers.

The Debtor's appraiser John Vaughn of Newmark Knight Frank has
appraised the Vineyard (which does not include the Wine Inventory),
at $218,700,000 as of August 27, 2022.

The Vineyard itself is an incomparable property, unique from all
other vineyards in the Napa Valley.  The Vineyard has been
producing fine wine since the late 1800s.  It was once four
separate properties, each with its own vineyard and winery: Spring
Mountain Vineyards, was originally owned by Tiburcio Parrott who
grew olives, citrus, grapes, and built a home on the property he
named Miraville; Chateau Chevalier, once owned by Fortune
Chevalier, whose stone winery began making wine in 1891; and La
Perla, founded in 1873 by Charles Lemme and expanded by the
Schilling Spice family. The fourth vineyard was called Streblow
Vineyards.

The total size of the property which includes the Vineyard is
approximately 845 acres.  The Vineyard features approximately 135
vineyard blocks across approximately 211 acres, each with a
different elevation, soil and exposure to the elements and each
producing a unique and diverse grape.  The Vineyard is also
improved with the estate residence, two winery buildings, a tasting
room, six wells, cisterns, an irrigation system, a historic barn,
and other outbuildings.

The Debtor's Chapter 11 filing was brought about by a number of
extraordinary events, including the COVID pandemic, which has
drastically reduced tourism in Napa County where the Debtor's
winery is located.

In addition, the Debtor has had difficulties with its secured
lender, MGG California, LLC, as agent for a number of related
lenders.  MMG is the Debtor's primary or only secured
creditor/lender.  The Debtor borrowed $185,000,000 from MGG in
2019.  Over the four years since this Loan originated, the Debtor
has made payments totaling at least $103,623,789.  Notwithstanding
this performance, the Debtor has had difficulties with MGG for some
time and these difficulties have created problems and issues with
its operations as it deals with MGG's demands that have come
because this is a defaulted loan.

Napa County regulates all vineyards by capping the amount of
gallons of wine per year each vineyard can manufacture.  The Debtor
possesses permits to manufacture 48,000 gallons per year, which is
a substantial amount for a vineyard in that area.  For a number of
years, the Debtor has been retaining a majority of each year's
production in order to build a vertical inventory library reaching
back to 1979. This inventory was part of what the Debtor owned at
the time we purchased it from its prior owner and was included in
the inventory that it received. The Vineyard's library is comprised
of 79,000 cases of wine., and this significantly enhances the value
of the Spring Mountain brand, making it more competitive to
established French vineyards, and is a significant factor in
drawing visitors (and purchasers) to the Vineyard's tasting room.
The Wine Inventory has a wholesale value of $82 million and a
retail value of $164 million.

To minimize the adverse effects of the commencement of the Debtor's
chapter 11 case, while at the same time preserving value for the
benefit of stakeholders, the Debtor has filed a number of emergency
motions requesting various forms of "first day" relief.

According to court filings, Spring Mountain Vineyard Inc. estimates
$100 million to $500 million in debt to 100 to 199 creditors.  The
petition states that funds will be available to unsecured
creditors.

                 About Spring Mountain Vineyard

Spring Mountain Vineyard Inc --
https://www.springmountainvineyard.com -- is a privately owned
estate comprised of four historic vineyards first planted to vine
in the late 1800s.  Only estate-bottled wines are produced.

Spring Mountain Vineyard Inc filed a petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on Sept. 30, 2022.  In the
petition filed by Constantine S. Yannias, as president, the Debtor
reported assets and liabilities between $100 million and $500
million.

The Debtor is represented by Victor A. Sahn of SulmeyerKupetz, APC.


STAPLES INC: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms 'B' ICR
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised the outlook to stable from negative and
affirmed all ratings on Staples Inc., including the 'B' issuer
credit rating.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our belief that leverage
will decline to below 7x and remain there over the coming year
aided by steady EBITDA expansion, despite ongoing industry
pressures.

"We revised the outlook to stable to reflect our expectation that
Staples' operating performance will continue to recover. For the
second quarter ended July 30, 2022, sales grew over 4% compared
with the same period last year because Staples passed on higher
inflation-driven costs. S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margins
increased to 7.3% for the 12-month period ended July 30, 2022, up
from 6.7% for the comparable period a year ago, due to expense
leverage and benefits from previous cost-cutting actions.
"In our updated forecast, we expect sales volume to grow as
employees return to the office and use office and break room
supplies. Recent pricing actions will also likely benefit
performance in the next year. These trends support our view that
Staples could sustain leverage below 7x in 2023, declining from
8.4x as of July 2022.

"We expect credit metrics to remain in line with our ratings
despite recessionary headwinds next year. Our economists believe a
shallow recession will occur in the first half of 2023, even as the
labor market remains good. With our forecast of 4.3% unemployment
rate for 2023, demand for office supplies should remain sound,
benefiting Staples' performance. As a result, we expect the
company's good top-line momentum to continue with sales growth of
low- to mid-single-digit percent next year. We believe Staples'
efforts to reduce costs over the years, as demonstrated through its
2021 strategic plan and the "Staples 2.0 Plan" that preceded it,
provide a lean cost structure for the company to operate in stress
environment."

Secular challenges for the office supply sector remain as hybrid
office environment across the country formalizes over the near
term. Following the period during the pandemic, where there has
been a surge in demand for supplies to support office reopening, we
expect previously observed secular declines in paper and printing
products could return due to the shift toward a permanent
hybrid/remote work structure. Nonetheless, S&P believes given
Staples' scale, brand recognition, and recent restructuring
efforts, Staples has opportunities to defend its share and raise
margin profile. For instance, next day delivery to almost
everywhere in the U.S. and 10%-savings for everyday customers are
ways for Staples to take share from small office supplies while
also competing against large diverse competitors such as Amazon.com
Inc. and Costco Wholesale Co. Staples has annual customer retention
rate of over 97% in large enterprise accounts and 92% annual
retention in mid-market accounts.

Sycamore's ownership of Staples poses uncertainty about future
financial policy. S&P views the company's private-equity ownership
as financial and governance risks given the tendency of sponsors to
use additional debt to fund acquisitions or cash distributions. S&P
does not believe Staples has room for debt-funded shareholder
distributions with our expectations for an upcoming recession and
forecasted leverage.

S&P said, "The stable outlook on Staples reflects our expectation
that performance will improve year-over-year with leverage
sustained at 7x or lower and that Staples will perform well in our
base-case recession scenario.

"We could lower our rating if we believe leverage will increase to
over 7x on a sustained basis, free operating cash flow (FOCF) to
debt is maintained in the low-single digit area, or revenue
contracts such that we have a less favorable view of the business."
This could occur if:

-- Performance weakens due to competitive pressures;

-- Business initiatives fail to drive top-line growth; or

-- Debt-financed acquisitions or shareholder initiatives elevate
leverage ratios for prolonged periods.

S&P said, "Although unlikely, we could raise the ratings on Staples
if it achieves faster-than-expected expansion in EBITDA margins
and/or material debt reductions, such that leverage would decline
and sustain below 5x and free cash flow-to-debt ratio would
approach 10%. Under this scenario, we would expect the company to
report materially stronger credit metrics while successfully
navigating secular challenges and committing to a more conservative
balance sheet."

ESG credit indicators: E-2, S-2, G-3



STONE CLINICAL: Disclosure Inadequate, Ridgeway Says
----------------------------------------------------
Christopher Ridgeway filed an objection to the Amended Disclosure
Statement filed jointly by the Stone Clinical Laboratories, LLC,
and Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.

Mr. Ridgeway asserts that the Disclosure Statement Should be
Updated to Disclose that the Debtor is Wholly Owned by Mr. Ridgeway
and is a Pass-Through Entity.

With regard to Whale's claim that the Disclosure Statement's
description of tax consequences for creditors and equity holders in
the Disclosure Statement is deficient, Mr. Ridgeway agrees that
supplementation is required.  The Debtor has filed returns through
tax year 2020. Article VI of the Disclosure Statement should be
supplemented to state that the Debtor's 2021 tax return will
reflect that: (1) Christopher Ridgeway is the sole equity holder of
the Debtor and (2) the Debtor will be considered a pass-through
entity for tax purposes.

Mr. Ridgeway adds that Whale's conclusory objections as to the
adequacy of Disclosure of unspecified causes of action against Mr.
Ridgeway and others should be overruled.  Whale provides no
description or explanation of the alleged "inaccuracies" of
statements relating to causes of action against Mr. Ridgeway and
others. Instead, Whale refers the Court (and other
parties-in-interest) to a messy redline appended to Whale's
objection, requiring the reader to infer how and why exactly the
Plan Proponents' language is inaccurate or inadequate. Whale has
also not provided an insert for the Disclosure Statement that would
set forth Whale's (mistaken, at best) view of the world. Rather,
Whale's goal in objecting to the Disclosure Statement appears be to
hijack the Plan Proponents' Disclosure Statement and rewrite it for
its own ends, without explaining why its proposed disclosure
statement more accurately informs creditors of the Debtor's affairs
than the Plan Proponents' filed Disclosure Statement.

The merits of Whale's objections notwithstanding, the Disclosure
Statement does require substantive supplementation and amendment,
mostly due to material changes in circumstance occurring
contemporaneously with or after the filing of the Disclosure
Statement.

Mr. Ridgeway asserts that Disclosure Statement fails to provide
"adequate information" in the following respects:

    * After an auction, the Debtor sold certain assets to a special
purpose entity, Stone Nola Acquisition, LLC, and its related
entities (all together, "SNA"), in a sale that closed
contemporaneously with the filing of the Disclosure Statement. The
auction and sale ("Sale") was conducted pursuant to 11 U.S.C. s 363
and the assets were sold free and clear of all liens and
encumbrances. Although the press of time understandably constrained
the Plan Proponents from fully disclosing the nature of the Sale,
the Disclosure Statement is currently deficient as written. The
Disclosure Statement should be supplemented at page 8 to advise
creditors that while claims against Mr. Ridgeway, Stone Capital,
LLC, and others were reserved, the Debtor and the estate have fully
waived and released any claims that may have existed against SNA or
the assets sold to SNA in the Sale.

   * Subsequent to the filing of the Disclosure Statement, the
Debtor requested and received approval pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule
9019 to enter into a settlement with TVT Capital, LLC ("TVT"),
pursuant to which the Debtor agreed to allow TVT's claim in the
amount of $283,684.40 (more than the Disclosure Statement discloses
TVT's total claim to be) and pay it from proceeds of the Sale.
Accordingly, the Disclosure Statement's description of TVT's claim
and its treatment at pages 10 and 25 requires material amendment.

   * On page 21, the Disclosure Statement contains an abbreviated
description of the Sale. The footnote presumably intended to cite
to the Court's order approving the Sale is blank. Again, the scope
and nature of the Sale must be more fully disclosed to creditors,
and it should be disclosed here, or elsewhere, that the Debtor and
the estate have fully waived and released any claims that may have
existed against SNA or the assets sold to SNA in the Sale.

   * The Disclosure Statement does not identify or adequately
describe insurance policies that are property of the estate,
including any policies pertaining to claims against the Debtor's
directors and officers ("D&O Policies"). The Disclosure Statement
discloses and notes that rights in or against D&O Policies are
specifically preserved unless otherwise indicated, and it is
therefore presumed that recovery under D&O Policies is contemplated
for the benefit of creditors. But the Disclosure Statement fails to
identify the D&O Policies, describe their exceptions or
limitations, or even set forth an estimated amount remaining under
coverage limits. The Disclosure Statement must be supplemented to
adequately inform stakeholders of this information.

    * The Disclosure Statement's description of tax consequences
for creditors and equity holders at page is 50 deficient;
supplementation is required. Article VI of the Disclosure Statement
should be supplemented to state that the Debtor's 2021 tax return
will reflect that: (1) Christopher Ridgeway is the sole equity
holder of the Debtor and (2) the Debtor will be considered a
pass-through entity for tax purposes.

Christopher Ridgeway's counsel:

     Stewart F. Peck, Esq.
     LUGENBUHL, WHEATON, PECK, RANKIN & HUBBARD
     601 Poydras Street, Suite 2775
     New Orleans, LA 70130
     Telephone: (504) 568-1990
     Facsimile: (504) 310-9195
     E-mail: speck@lawla.com

                About STONE Clinical Laboratories

STONE Clinical Laboratories, LLC, is a full-service clinical
reference laboratory that specializes in preventative and molecular
diagnostics testing.  The company is based in New Orleans, La.

On July 15, 2021, Whale Capital, L.P., Hologic, Inc. and Woman's
Hospital Foundation filed an involuntary Chapter 11 petition
against the Debtor. On Jan. 10, 2022, the court entered the order
for relief, thereby, commencing the Chapter 11 case (Bankr. E.D.
La. Case No. 21-10923). The petitioning creditors are represented
by The Derbes Law Firm LLC, Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss P.C., and The
McCarthy Law Firm.

Judge Meredith S. Grabill presides over the case.

Heller, Draper & Horn, LLC and Gordian Seaport Advisors, LLC serve
as the Debtor's legal counsel and investment banker, respectively.

David Asbach, acting U.S. Trustee for Region 5, appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors on Feb. 3, 2022. The
committee is represented by Liskow & Lewis, APLC.


STOWERS TRUCKING: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 4 disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Stowers Trucking, LLC.
  
                      About Stowers Trucking
  
Stowers Trucking, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Va. Case No. 22-20125) on July 28,
2022, with up to $500,000 in both assets and liabilities. Judge B.
Mckay Mignault oversees the case.

James M. Pierson, Esq., at Pierson Legal Services is the Debtor's
legal counsel.


SUNGARD AS NEW: To Seek Plan Confirmation on Oct. 17
----------------------------------------------------
Sungard as New Holdings, LLC, et al., will seek confirmation of
their Plan and sale of the assets to the successful bidder on Oct.
17, 2022.

On August 1, 2022, the Debtors announced 365 SG Operating Company
LLC as the successful bidder for the majority of the Debtors' U.S.
colocation services and network services.  The 365 Sale was
approved by the Court on Aug. 31,  2022.

On August 24, 2022, the Debtors announced 11:11 Systems, Inc., as
the successful bidder for substantially all assets exclusively
relating to the Debtors' cloud and managed services and mainframe
as a service business.  The CMS Sale was approved by the Court on
Sept. 14, 2022.

Moreover, in accordance with the Bidding Procedures, the Debtors
have determined that the offer submitted by 11:11 Systems for all
assets, properties and business owned, held or used primarily in or
otherwise necessary for the conduct of (a) disaster recovery
services and consulting services related thereto, including
traditional and cloud recovery, mobile workplace recovery, data
replication, backup and vaulting and managed recovery programs, and
(b) colocation services revenue at certain facilities subject to
real property leases, in each case, in Canada and the United
States, was the highest or best offer for such assets.

The hearing on the Debtors' First Amended Combined Disclosure
Statement and Joint Chapter 11 Plan was slated for Oct. 3, 2022 but
the Court has agreed to modify the deadlines and dates in
connection with the Plan:

   * Plan Supplement Filing Deadline: October 5, 2022

   * Voting Deadline: Oct. 12, 2022 at 4:00 p.m. (prevailing
Central Time)

   * Plan and Disclosure Statement Objection Deadline: Oct. 12,
2022 at 4:00 p.m. (prevailing Central Time)

   * Deadline to File Voting Report: October 14, 2022

   * Combined Hearing on the Disclosure Statement and Plan: Oct.
17, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. (prevailing Central Time)

At the Combined Hearing, the Debtors will also seek approval of the
Sale Transaction.

                        First Amended Plan

Sungard as New Holdings, LLC, et al., submitted a First Amended
Combined Disclosure Statement and Joint Chapter 11 Plan.

On August 31, 2022, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of the
Debtors' U.S. colocation services, network services and workplace
services assets to 365 Data Centers and the Debtors are seeking
approval of a sale of their North American cloud and managed
services and mainframe as a service assets to 11:11 Systems, Inc.


The Debtors also remain engaged in discussions regarding a
potential sale transaction for the Debtors' data recovery business
and related assets (i.e, the Eagle assets).  To the extent the
Debtors' Eagle assets are not sold, the Debtors intend to
reorganize around the Eagle business and any other remaining
assets.  In the event that the Debtors determine to proceed with an
Eagle Sale Transaction, it is not anticipated that the value
resulting from the consummation of such sale would be sufficient to
satisfy the First Lien Credit Agreement Claims in full.

In settlement of disputes with the Committee, the Debtors, the
Committee and the Required Consenting Stakeholders agreed to a
global resolution of various matters in connection with the
Debtors' restructuring (the "Global Settlement").  The relevant
components of the Global Settlement are as follows:

    * The Required Consenting Stakeholders agreed to fund the Wind
Down Amount.  The Required Consenting Stakeholders agreed to fund
an amount up to $4,050,000 on account of accrued, unpaid and
allowed claims for postpetition rent for the period between April
11, 2022 and April 30, 2022 for any commercial real property lease
to be paid promptly upon such allowance either as part of Cure
Costs or from the cash sale proceeds realized from one or more Sale
Transactions, subject to a dollar-for-dollar reduction if such
lease is assumed by a Successful Bidder, satisfied pursuant to any
asset purchase agreement, or consensually agreed to by a landlord.


    * The Required Consenting Stakeholders agreed to fund an amount
up to $781,000 on account of claims subject to Section 503(b)(9)
(the "503(b)(9) Claims"), subject to a dollar-for-dollar reduction
to the extent any 503(b)(9) Claim is disallowed, reduced by
agreement or court order, assumed by a successful bidder or
otherwise satisfied during the Chapter 11 Cases (in the Debtors'
business judgment) or pursuant to another provision of an asset
purchase agreement.

    * Avoidance Actions shall be excluded from any sale of the
Debtors' assets with a commitment of the Debtors not to prosecute
such actions or, if sold as part of a Sale Transaction, subject to
a covenant not to sue.

    * No General Unsecured Creditor will receive a distribution
where the recovery to such General Unsecured Creditor exceeds the
percentage recovery on the Tranche C Term Loan DIP Facility Claims,
excluding General Unsecured Creditors paid under any Final Order
approving First Day Pleading, any General Unsecured Creditor whose
lease or contract is assumed, or any General Unsecured Creditor
that has an alternative source of recovery from outside the
Debtors' Estates.

Under the Global Settlement, the Debtors, the Required Consenting
Stakeholders and the Committee agreed that no General Unsecured
Creditor would receive a distribution in excess of the recovery for
holders of Tranche C Term Loan DIP Facility Claims (the junior most
tranche of the Term Loan DIP Facility). Despite an extensive
Court-approved marketing process, such sale process did not produce
bids at a value in excess of the two senior most tranches of the
Term Loan DIP Facility, i.e. the Tranche A Term Loan DIP Facility
Claims and the Tranche B Term Loan DIP Facility Claims (including
any potential bid for the Debtors' remaining Eagle assets). As a
result, pursuant to the "Roll-Up Recharacterization" provision of
the Final DIP Order, the full amount of the Tranche C Term Loan DIP
Facility Claims will be deemed to be "un-rolled" and restored as
prepetition Second Lien Credit Agreement Claims. The Tranche B Term
Loan DIP Facility Claims will also be subject to the Roll-Up
Recharacterization as prepetition First Lien Credit Agreement
Claims to the extent that they are ultimately determined to have
exceeded the value realizable by the Term Loan DIP Lenders under
the Plan. As such, because the Debtors' restructuring process
(inclusive of any Sale Transactions consummated) are not expected
to result in value in excess of the Tranche A Term Loan DIP
Facility Claims and Tranche B Term Loan DIP Facility Claims, the
holders of Tranche C Term Loan DIP Facility Claims will not receive
any recovery pursuant to the Plan.  Although the Global Settlement
contemplated a potential small cash distribution for General
Unsecured Creditors, such distribution was contingent on the
holders of Tranche C Term Loan DIP Facility Claims receiving a
distribution pursuant to the Plan.  Therefore, General Unsecured
Creditors are not entitled to any recovery under the Global
Settlement.

Under the Plan, Class 6 General Unsecured Claims total $75 million.
General Unsecured Claims will be canceled, released and
extinguished as of the Effective Date, and will be of no further
force or effect, and Holders of General Unsecured Claims will not
receive any distribution on account of such General Unsecured
Claims. Class 6 is impaired.

Co-Counsel to the Debtors:

     Matthew D. Cavenaugh, Esq.
     Jennifer F. Wertz, Esq.
     Rebecca Blake Chaikin, Esq.
     JACKSON WALKER LLP
     1401 McKinney Street, Suite 1900
     Houston, TX 77010
     Telephone: (713) 752-4200
     Facsimile: (713) 752-4221
     E-mail: mcavenaugh@jw.com
             jwertz@jw.com
             rchaikin@jw.com

          - and -

     Philip C. Dublin, Esq.
     Meredith A. Lahaie, Esq.
     Kevin Zuzolo, Esq.
     Melanie A. Miller, Esq.
     AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
     One Bryant Park
     New York, NY 10036
     Telephone: (212) 872-1000
     Facsimile: (212) 872-1002
     E-mail: pdublin@akingump.com
             mlahaie@akingump.com
             kzuzolo@akingump.com
             melanie.miller@akingump.com

          - and -

     Marty L. Brimmage, Jr., Esq.
     Lacy M. Lawrence, Esq.
     Zach D. Lanier, Esq.
     AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
     2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1800
     Dallas, TX 75201
     Telephone: (214) 969-2800
     Facsimile: (214) 969-4343
     E-mail: mbrimmage@akingump.com
             llawrence@akingump.com
             zlanier@akingump.com

A copy of the First Amended Combined Disclosure Statement and Joint
Chapter 11 Plan dated September 23, 2022, is available at
https://bit.ly/3r6nVkh from PacerMonitor.com.

                 About Sungard AS New Holdings

Sungard Availability Services is a Wayne, Pa.-based
information-technology services provider owned by Angelo Gordon,
Blackstone Credit, FS/KKR Advisor LLC and Carlyle Group Inc. It
provides disaster recovery services, colocation and network
services, cloud and managed services and workplace recovery to
customers in North America, Europe and Asia.

The company and its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection
twice in three years.

Sungard filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2019 with a prepackaged
plan that was approved by a New York bankruptcy court one day after
it was filed.

Sungard AS New Holdings, LLC and affiliates, including Sungard
Availability Services, LP, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 22-90018) on April
11, 2022. Judge David R. Jones oversees the case.

In the petition signed by Michael K. Robinson, CEO and president,
Sungard AS disclosed up to $1 billion in both assets and
liabilities.

Sungard Availability Services (UK) Limited, an indirect subsidiary
of Holdings, entered into administration in the UK on March 25,
2022. Meanwhile, Sungard Canada filed an application for
recognition in Canada under the Companies Creditors' Arrangement
Act of its Chapter 11 case.

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and Jackson Walker serve as
legal counsel to the Debtors. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, serves
as their Canadian legal counsel.  DH Capital, LLC and Houlihan
Lokey, Inc., act as investment bankers.  FTI Consulting, Inc.
serves as financial and restructuring advisor.

Alvarez & Marsal Canada Inc., serves as Canadian court-appointed
information officer and is represented by Bennett Jones, LLP as
counsel in connection with the Canadian proceedings.

Kroll Restructuring Administration, LLC serves as notice and claims
agent.

Proskauer Rose, LLP and Gray Reed & McGraw, LLP serve as counsel to
Acquiom Agency Services LLC, the Term Loan DIP agent, and Term Loan
DIP lenders.

PNC Bank, National Association, serves as administrative agent and
collateral agent, under the DIP ABL facility.  PNC is represented
by Thompson Coburn Hahn & Hessen LLP as counsel.


SUNGARD AS: Forshey, Bialson Represent Cisco Systems, 2 Others
--------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
the law firms of Forshey Prostok LLP and Bialson, Bergen & Schwab,
A Professional Corporation provided notice that they are
representing Cisco Systems Credit Corporation, NetApp, Inc., and
salesforce, Inc. in the Chapter 11 cases of Sungard AS New
Holdings, LLC.

Forshey & Prostok is a law firm that maintains its principal office
at 777 Main Street, Suite 1550, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.

BBS is a law firm that maintains its office at 830 Menlo Avenue,
Suite 201, Menlo Park, California 94025.

The name and address of the creditors represented by Counsel are:

     a. Cisco Systems Capital Corporation
        Attn: Sandra Montalvo Hernandez
        7025-3 Kit Creek Road
        PO Box 14987
        Research Triangle Park
        North Carolina 27709-4987

     b. NetApp, Inc.
        Attn: Angela Rempel Endreola
        3060 Olsen Drive
        San Jose, CA 95128

     c. salesforce, inc.
        Attn: Kevin Ramirez
        415 Mission St, 3rd Floor
        San Francisco, CA 94105

Cisco Capital asserts (i) that its agreements with the Debtors
constitute a single integrated executory contract for purposes of
assumption and assignment pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §365, (ii) as of
June 16, 2022 the cure amount of US$ 26,202.03 is due and owing,
but unpaid; and (iii) if the Cisco Capital agreements are assumed
and assigned in connection with one or more sale, not less than
$208,307.03 in future payment will also become due and owing to
Cisco Capital.

NetApp asserts (i) that its agreements with the Debtors constitute
a single integrated executory contract for purposes of assumption
and assignment pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §365, and (ii) as of June 20,
2022, the cure amount of US$ 146,847.47 is due and owing, but
unpaid.

Salesforce asserts (i) that its agreements with the Debtors
constitute a single integrated executory contract for purposes of
assumption and assignment pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §365, (ii) as of
June 20, 2022, the cure amount of US$ 428,416.79 is due and owing,
but unpaid; and (iii) if the Salesforce agreements are assumed and
assigned in connection with one or more sale, not less than
$2,158,862.33 in future payment will also become due and owing to
Salesforce.

Cisco Capital, NetApp, and Salesforce retained Forshey & Prostok as
their local counsel in these Chapter 11 Cases through BBS in June
2022. Forshey & Prostok has no power to act on behalf of the above
creditors other than as local counsel in these Chapter 11 Cases.

Cisco Capital and NetApp retained BBS as their legal counsel with
respect to matters arising in these Chapter 11 Cases and for
purposes of asserting claims and protecting other rights and
interests in relation to the Debtors in April 2022. Salesforce
retained BBS as their legal counsel with respect to matters arising
in these Chapter 11 Cases and for purposes of asserting claims and
protecting other rights and interests in relation to the Debtors in
May 2022. BBS has concurrently represented Cisco Capital, NetApp,
and Salesforce in other bankruptcy cases throughout the country.
BBS has fully advised each of the parties above with respect to
their concurrent representation, and each of the parties consented
to such representation.

Counsel holds no claims against or interest in the above-captioned
Debtors or their estates.

Counsel for Creditors Cisco Systems Credit Corporation, NetApp,
Inc., and salesforce, Inc. can be reached at:

       FORSHEY PROSTOK LLP
       Jeff P. Prostok, Esq.
       Dylan T.F. Ross, Esq.
       777 Main St. Suite 1550
       Fort Worth, TX
       Tel: (817) 877-4223
       Fax: (817) 877-4151
       E-mail: jprostok@forsheyprostok.com
               dross@forsheyprostok.com

          - and -

       BIALSON, BERGEN & SCHWAB
       A Professional Corporation
       Thomas M. Gaa, Esq.
       633 Menlo Avenue, Suite 100
       Menlo Park, CA 94025
       Tel: (650) 857-9500
       Fax: (650) 494-2738
       E-mail: Tgaa@bbslaw.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing is available at
https://bit.ly/3CEN3Fi at no extra charge.

                 About Sungard AS New Holdings

Sungard Availability Services is a Wayne, Pa.-based
information-technology services provider owned by Angelo Gordon,
Blackstone Credit, FS/KKR Advisor LLC and Carlyle Group Inc.  It
provides disaster recovery services, colocation and network
services, cloud and managed services and workplace recovery to
customers in North America, Europe and Asia.

The company and its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection
twice in three years.

Sungard filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2019 with a prepackaged
plan that was approved by a New York bankruptcy court one day after
it was filed.

Sungard AS New Holdings, LLC and affiliates, including Sungard
Availability Services, LP, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 22-90018) on April
11, 2022.  Judge David R. Jones oversees the case.

In the petition signed by Michael K. Robinson, CEO and president,
Sungard AS disclosed up to $1 billion in both assets and
liabilities.

Sungard Availability Services (UK) Limited, an indirect subsidiary
of Holdings, entered into administration in the UK on March 25,
2022.  Meanwhile, Sungard Canada filed an application for
recognition in Canada under the Companies Creditors' Arrangement
Act of its Chapter 11 case.

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and Jackson Walker serve as
legal counsel to the Debtors. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, serves
as their Canadian legal counsel.  DH Capital, LLC and Houlihan
Lokey, Inc., act as investment bankers.  FTI Consulting, Inc.,
serves as financial and restructuring advisor.

Alvarez & Marsal Canada Inc., serves as Canadian court-appointed
information officer and is represented by Bennett Jones, LLP as
counsel in connection with the Canadian proceedings.

Kroll Restructuring Administration, LLC serves as notice and claims
agent.

Proskauer Rose, LLP and Gray Reed & McGraw, LLP serve as counsel to
Acquiom Agency Services LLC, the Term Loan DIP agent, and Term Loan
DIP lenders.

PNC Bank, National Association, serves as administrative agent and
collateral agent, under the DIP ABL facility.  PNC is represented
by Thompson Coburn Hahn & Hessen LLP as counsel.


T.G. UNITED: Exclusivity Period Extended to Nov. 7
--------------------------------------------------
T.G. United, Inc., a Florida Corporation obtained a court order
extending its exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan to Nov. 7
and solicit acceptances from creditors to Jan. 6 next year.

The ruling by Judge Catherine Peek Mcewen of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Florida allows the company to
pursue its own plan without the threat of a competing plan from
creditors.

                      About T.G. United Inc.

T.G. United Inc. -- http://www.tgunited.com/-- manufactures a wide
range of solid dose products including tablets and capsules in
compliance with the OTC monograph.

T.G. United sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M. Fla. Case No.
22-01831) on May 6, 2022, listing $1 million to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities. Andrew Wittman II, chief executive officer,
signed the petition.

Judge Catherine Peek Mcewen oversees the case.

Steven E. Wallace, Esq., at Ward Damon, PL is the Debtor's legal
counsel.


TELEGRAPH SQUARE II: Exclusivity Period Extended to Jan. 12
-----------------------------------------------------------
Telegraph Square II, a Condominium Unit Owners Association obtained
a court order extending its exclusive right to file a Chapter 11
plan to Jan. 12 and solicit acceptances from creditors to March
13.

The ruling by Judge Klinette Kindred of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Virginia allows the association to
remain in control of its bankruptcy while it waits for the outcome
of its appeal at the Court of Appeals of Virginia.

Prior to its bankruptcy filing, Telegraph appealed a court judgment
awarded to 7205 Telegraph Square, LLC, one of the association's
unit owners, in the amount of $812,709. The judgment in favor of
7205 Telegraph Square was issued by the Circuit Court of Fairfax
County, Virginia, which handled the case filed by the unit owner
against the association in 2019.

"The appeal from the judgment remains a substantial unresolved
contingency that will influence the necessity and timing of any
plan filed," said the association's attorney, Robert Marino, Esq.,
at Redmon Peyton & Braswell, LLP.

If the judgment is overturned, no plan will be necessary and the
association's Chapter 11 case will likely be dismissed. If the
judgment is upheld, the association's plan has to provide for
periodic payments funded from special assessments of the
association's unit owners imposed over some specified time frame,
according to the attorney.

"The length and timing of such payments will be determined either
by negotiation with [7205 Telegraph Square] or through contested
proceedings before the court," Marino said in court papers.

                     About Telegraph Square II

Telegraph Square II, a Condominium Unit Owners Association is
engaged in activities related to real estate. The association is
based in Fairfax, Va.

Telegraph Square sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 22-10302) on March 16,
2022, with $248,032 in assets and $1,129,919 in liabilities.
Stephanie Tavares, secretary and treasurer, signed the petition.

Judge Klinette H. Kindred oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Robert M. Marino, Esq., at Redmon Peyton &
Braswell, LLP as bankruptcy counsel; Reed Smith, LLP as special
counsel; and Analytic Financial Group, LLC, doing business as
Corporate Matters, as financial services provider.


TREEHOUSE FOODS: S&P Affirms 'B' ICR, Off CreditWatch Developing
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings removed all of its U.S.-based TreeHouse Foods
Inc. ratings from CreditWatch, where S&P placed them with
developing implications on Aug. 11, 2022 and S&P affirmed its 'B'
issuer credit rating on TreeHouse given its expectation for
leverage to remain more than 5x over the next 12 to 24 months,
despite the debt reduction because S&P expects the company to
continue to incur high restructuring expenses.

S&P said, "We lowered issue-level ratings on the company's senior
secured credit facilities to 'B+' from 'BB-', and revised the
recovery rating to '2', indicating our expectations of substantial
(70%-90%; rounded percentage: 80%) recovery in the event of a
payment default, from '1'. The lower recovery rating reflects the
lower enterprise value of the company following the divestitures,
which reduces the recovery prospects for lenders. We affirmed the
'CCC+' issue-level ratings on the unsecured notes. The recovery
rating is '6', indicating our expectations of negligible (0%-10%;
rounded percentage: 0%) recovery in the event of a payment
default.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that demand trends
will remain favorable amid weak macroeconomic conditions and the
company's profitability will improve with the realization of price
increases to offset rising costs, resulting in leverage declining
below 7x over the next 12 months.

"While we view the debt repayment and streamlined portfolio as
favorable, the affirmation reflects the company's still high
leverage and ongoing profitability improvement initiatives. We
estimate pro forma leverage for the asset divestitures and debt
paydown to be 8x for the fiscal year ending Dec. 31, 2022,
reflecting the lower EBITDA base after the sale of assets and
ongoing high restructuring charges. TreeHouse plans to spend
another $39 million in cash restructuring costs in 2023 for its
remaining businesses, after spending $49 million in 2022. The
company has already spent more than $200 million in restructuring
charges over the last two years on the combined businesses. The
company plans to incur these expenses to optimize its supply chain
network and processes and reorganize its operations. The company
has also made tax payments that were deferred under the CARES Act
in 2020 during this year. We believe the restructuring
charges--which have persisted for years—will continue to depress
the company's profitability and cash flow generation. We expect the
lesser amount of restructuring charges combined with benefits from
the company's pricing initiatives to result in leverage declining
to about 6.8x by the end of fiscal 2023.

"The company's portfolio optimization and operational turnaround
remains a work in progress. Since the acquisition of the private
brands business from Conagra, TreeHouse has not been able to
realize sustained margin improvements. While the meal preparation
assets sale should reduce complexity and streamline the business,
the company has yet to maintain consistent performance. We expect
dis-synergies from the separation of operations to be minimal as
the company has near-term purchasing agreements for most of its raw
materials and other inputs, and a transition services agreement to
facilitate an efficient transfer of operations to the new owner of
the divested businesses. However, the pasta business was sizable
and highly profitable, and it is unclear if the loss of that
category or any of the meals businesses could prove to be a
disadvantage with retailers."

Overall, S&P believes the sale of majority of the meal preparation
business should improve operational execution by allowing
management to focus on fewer categories and products (also known as
SKUs in the industry). TreeHouse will operate in 18 product
categories with 9,000 SKUs compared to 29 categories with 14,000
SKUs previously. The divested categories include pasta, dressing,
preserves, red sauces, syrup, dry blends and baking, dry dinners,
pie filling, pita chips, and other sauces. While the remaining
company will have reduced scale, it will retain its faster-growing
and higher-margin categories, which generally have a lower degree
of private-label penetration and higher demand trends, which will
provide it with greater growth opportunities. These include
crackers, cookies, bars, pretzels, candy, and in-store bakery
items; and single-serve beverages, tea, liquid beverages, powdered
beverages, and nondairy creamer.

Still, the restructuring charges indicate that additional
investments are necessary to optimize its operating structure.
TreeHouse must improve its plant efficiencies to restore growth and
profitability in line with the industry. In addition, 40% of the
remaining business will operate in slower-growth, meal-related
categories, such as pickles, broth, hot cereal, griddle, cheese and
pudding, and refrigerated dough. S&P believes these assets have
higher commodity exposure and, therefore, tend to be more volatile
particularly in the current inflationary environment. Most of these
assets also have limited scale within TreeHouse's portfolio and the
company may look to further divest some of them.

S&P said, "The company should generate good cash flows, and
proceeds from the seller note will bolster cash balances; however,
further debt reduction seems unlikely. TreeHouse has historically
generated strong cash flow from operations. However, cash flows
have been significantly reduced because of restructuring
initiatives since 2018. We expect cash flow generation to improve
in fiscal 2023 as the restructuring actions wind down and with
increased focus on working capital improvements, especially
inventory management and extending payable days. We expect the
company to generate $150 million-$200 million in free cash flow in
2023 after about $98 million in capital expenditures (capex). The
company implemented an operating expense restructuring program in
2018 for a cost of $93 million, followed by an ongoing
restructuring program focused on growth initiatives that began in
2021 and is expected to result in $130 million of total cash costs.
The company has also incurred other expenses aimed at improving its
margins and higher growth.

"We believe the $420 million seller note provided by TreeHouse as
part of the transaction will generate significant interest income
for the company, if not prepaid by the buyer of the assets,
Investindustrial. The note has an initial coupon of 10% for the
first two years, escalating to 11% for the third year, 12% for the
fourth year, and 13% thereafter. Proceeds from the note combined
with cash flow from operations will strengthen the company's cash
position and provide more financial flexibility to execute its
growth strategy.

"While we expect management to allocate capital prudently, we
believe the company will prioritize opportunistic acquisitions to
bolster its snacking and beverage portfolio. The company's growth
strategy for the remaining business is aimed at building depth
within the categories that it operates in. We believe the company
will seek tuck-in acquisitions that build upon its capabilities
within existing categories or provide complementary products to
round out its portfolio." The company does not pay a dividend and
does not regularly repurchase shares.

Trends in the private label industry are favorable and will likely
support improving earnings and cash flow generation over the next
year. S&P Global economists expect a recession in 2023. Persistent
inflation, particularly in areas such as food and gas, and consumer
saving rates dipping below pre-pandemic levels, have triggered a
shift in consumer purchasing behavior. TreeHouse should benefit
from good demand for snack and beverages, elevated at-home food
consumption, and consumers shifting back to private label amid the
current weak macroeconomic environment.

S&P said, "We believe TreeHouse is well positioned to capture the
benefits from these trends given its scale and capabilities, as
well as its long-standing relationships with top customers (average
tenure of over 10 years). We expect the supportive demand trends,
along with price increases, will lead to a double-digit percent
rise in the company's revenue in fiscal 2022. Furthermore,
TreeHouse's large scale should provide it with a competitive
advantage in an increasingly competitive market. The fragmented
private-label industry has consistently grown, even after the
recession. At under 20% of retail food sales in the U.S., there are
still opportunities in the industry for further share gains. Growth
of greater innovations and premium products, and favorable
demographic trends should support further industry growth.
Private-label has become increasingly attractive to the growing and
influential millennial and Generation Z populations, which are more
open to trying new brands. In addition, private-label products are
attractive to retailers because they often offer higher margins
than branded alternatives.

"We expect the supportive sector demand trends, along with price
increases, will lead to a double-digit percent rise in the
company's revenue in fiscal year 2022. We expect the company to
benefit from the higher growth prospects of the snacking and
beverages portion of its remaining business, resulting in
mid-single-digit revenue growth in fiscal 2023, while lower
forecasted restructuring expenses should drive EBITDA margin
improvement to about 7.5% in fiscal 2023 from about 6.7% in 2022 on
a pro forma basis.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that demand trends
will remain strong and the company will incur lower restructuring
charges and offset rising costs, resulting in leverage declining
below 7x over the next 12 months."

S&P could lower the ratings if the company does not sustain its
cash flow generation or is unable to deleverage towards 7x or
below. S&P believes this could occur if:

-- Operating performance deteriorates because of supply chain
disruptions, inflationary pressures or market share losses,
resulting in EBITDA margin contraction of more than 100 basis
points (bps) compared with our 2022 forecast; or

-- The company adopts a more aggressive financial policy by
funding large, debt-financed acquisitions or dividends.

S&P could raise its ratings if the company demonstrates an ability
to improve its competitive position by growing within its product
categories, rolls off its restructuring charges, and sustains
leverage below 5x. S&P believes this could occur if:

-- The company delivers sustained low-single-digit organic revenue
growth and EBITDA margin of at least 10%, from gaining market share
and new customers; and

-- The company applies excess cash flow to debt reduction while
foregoing sizable acquisitions.

ESG credit indicators: E-2, S-2, G-2



ULTRA SEAL: Seeks Cash Collateral Access
----------------------------------------
Ultra Seal Corporation and Ultra-Tab Laboratories, Inc. ask the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York,
Poughkeepsie Division, for authority to use cash collateral and
provide adequate protection.

The Debtors require the use of cash collateral to meet the minimal
monthly obligations associated with the debtor’s operations,
including but not limited to, insurance, utilities, and
maintenance.

Ultra Seal is a contract packager of pharmaceutical products,
nutritional supplements and personal care products. Ultra-Tab is a
bulk manufacturer of those products. Both are regulated by the
United States Food and Drug Administration. Prior to the chapter 11
filings (for approximately 3 years), the Debtors were attempting to
respond to FDA criticisms regarding compliance with Current Good
Manufacturing Practices. In October 2021, in an attempt to address
FDA concerns, it was decided to stop production at Ultra-Tab and
place all finished goods inventory produced at Ultra-Tab and
packaged at Ultra Seal into quarantine. The value of the inventory
placed into quarantine was close to $3,000,000. In addition, the
shutdown also halted the use of inventory purchased for jobs that
were expected to be run from October 2021 through December 2021.

From October 2021 through February 2022, the Debtors embarked on
performing corrective actions to address the FDA concerns. In March
2022, the FDA issued each of the Debtors a warning letter, which
mandated the Debtors to hire an independent third-party consultant
to prepare an evaluation of both companies' cGMP's practices during
the proceeding two years. As the consultants were completing their
evaluation, it became evident that the conclusion was going to be
that the Debtors’ cGMP compliance over the last few years did not
meet industry standards or FDA expectations. With the inability to
ship the finished goods in quarantine or use the inventory
manufactured to the Debtors' specifications, the Debtors believe
that protection under chapter 11 and a reorganization of its vendor
and miscellaneous obligations in the Bankruptcy Court is necessary
and in the best interest of its creditors.

At the time of the bankruptcy filing, Ultra Seal was the obligor
under a $250,000 note and security agreement with M&T Bank. As of
the Petition Date, Ultra Seal was current with the obligations due
and owing to M&T Bank. The total obligation due and owing to M&T
Bank as of petition date was $744, 200.

Ultra-Tab was the obligor under notes and security agreements with
M&T Bank in the total approximate amount of $494,200. As of the
Petition Date, Ultra-Tab was current with the obligations due and
owing to M&T Bank.

It is anticipated that Ultra-Tab will sell substantially all of its
assets in through a liquidating Chapter 11 plan and satisfy M&T
Bank obligation in full. The obligations owed to M&T BANK are
collateralized by substantially all of the Debtors' assets,
including its accounts, accounts receivable, equipment, machinery
and inventory.

The Debtors believe that the existence of the automatic stay and
the Debtors' use of cash collateral are not decreasing the value of
the liens of M&T BANK. The fair market value of the Debtors' assets
far exceeds the amount owed to M&T BANK2. However, to the extent
that the Court determines that the value of the property is
depreciating, the Debtors are willing to provide M&T BANK adequate
protection payments during the period before its Chapter 11 Plan is
confirmed. The question before the Court is what amount must be
paid by the Debtors to M&T BANK to 'adequately protect' M&T BANK's
interest in the Debtors' assets.

In the event that the Court finds that adequate protection payments
are necessary, the Debtors are prepared to make monthly payments to
M&T Bank in an amount to be determined by the Court. The Debtors
assert that maintaining the "interest only" payments on the M&T
BANK obligations provides M&T BANK with more than adequate
protection of its interest.

A copy of the motion is available at https://bit.ly/3RNTKcu from
PacerMonitor.com.

                About Ultra Seal Corporation

Ultra Seal Corporation is a privately owned and operated contract
packager of pharmaceutical products, nutritional supplements and
personal care products located in the heart of New York's Hudson
Valley. Affiliate, Ultra-Tab Laboratories, Inc., is a bulk
manufacturer of those products. Both are regulated by the United
States Food and Drug Administration.

The Debtors sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 22-35630) on October
6, 2022. In the petition signed by Dennis Borrello, president,
Ultra Seal disclosed $8,861,955 in assets and $5,757,027 in
liabilities.

Michelle L. Trier, Esq., at Genova, Malin & Trier, LLP, is the
Debtors' counsel.

Judge Cecelia G. Morris oversees the cases.




VIRGINIA TRUE: Creditors' Plan Slated for Vote
----------------------------------------------
Judge Nancy Hershey Lord has entered an order approving the
Disclosure Statement Diatomite Corporation of America, Anthony
Cipollone, and Domenick Cipollone, the Creditor Plan Proponents of
debtor Virginia True Corporation.

The hearing to consider confirmation of the Creditor Plan, and any
objections thereto will be held before this Court by Zoom on
November 9, 2022 at 10:30 a.m.

Oct. 28, 2022, will be the deadline by which all Ballots must be
properly executed, completed, and delivered so that they are
actually received by the counsel to the Creditor Plan Proponents.

Nov. 1, 2022, will be the deadline by which the report tabulating
the voting on the Plan will be filed with the Bankruptcy Court.

Nov. 2, 2022, will be the deadline by which objections to the
Creditor Plan must be filed with the Bankruptcy Court and served so
as to be actually received by the appropriate notice parties.

Nov. 4, 2022, will be the deadline by which the Creditor Plan
Proponents will file their brief in support of Confirmation and
responses to objections to the Plan with the Bankruptcy Court.

                About Virginia True Corporation

Virginia True Corporation, a New York-based golf resort owner and
developer, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-42769) on May 3, 2019. At the
time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed between $10 million and
$50 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Nancy Hershey Lord oversees the case.

Pick & Zabicki LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.


WATER WIND: Files Amendment to Disclosure Statement
---------------------------------------------------
Water Wind and Sky LLC submitted a First Amended Disclosure
Statement for the Plan of Reorganization dated October 3, 2022.

The Plan provides for full payment of all creditors from land lease
proceeds, the proceeds from the sale of the land lease, or the
proceeds of the sale of the Debtor's real property.

In February 2021, in connection with a purchase and sale agreement
with the MGP Beacon-related entity, and on the request of a
potential lender, Partner provided its Phase II environmental
report indicating the presence of contaminated soil in an area
comprised of less than 1% of the total Property, and MGP notes that
the Phase II report included a finding that the presence of
petroleum hydrocarbons on a portion of the Property exceeded
regulatory guidelines. Krazan and Debtor manager Mark Goldberg
determined the concern raised by Partner was minor and would be
addressed by the installation of vapor barrier1 under the
foundation of the underground parking garage of the Beacon Project.
The Debtor also notes that the PLIA Opinion, is consistent with the
installation of a vapor barrier as sufficient to address the
issues.  

In April 2021, the Debtor requested and obtained a formal opinion
from the State of Washington Pollution Liability Insurance Agency
("PLIA Opinion") stating that "no further remediation action will
likely be necessary to clean up contamination at the Site." The
PLIA Opinion determined that the installation of the vapor barrier
needed to be completed, followed by an indoor air vapor performance
assessment of the effectiveness of the engineer control to protect
human health as the basis for a NFA determination at this Site. The
PLIA Opinion was based on the Krazan conclusions/reports.

MGP's position with respect to the environmental issues, which the
Debtor disputes, is that there were environmental defaults and that
those defaults are continuing. MGP notes that the Department of
Ecology lists the Property on a list of "Confirmed and Suspected
Contaminated Sites." The Debtor's position is that that listing
does not affect the ability of the Debtor to address the issue as
set forth in the PLIA Opinion.

The Debtor, MGP Beacon, and Goldberg have agreed to participate in
a judicial settlement conference with Judge Whitman Holt. The
parties will attempt to settle matters related to the MGP Beacon
Adversary Proceeding, MGP Beacon's Class 1 Claim treatment under
the Plan, and the state guaranty litigation initiated by MGP Beacon
against Goldberg. On August 26, 2022, the Debtor produced to MGP
Beacon copies of its bank statements from October 2020 to April
2022 and loan ledgers for the unsecured loans.

As detailed in the Plan, each claimant in Classes 1 and 2 will be
paid in full, with interest accruing at the rate specified in the
Plan, from the proceeds of a ground lease to be entered into
between the Debtor and a third-party developer, including
anticipated proceeds from sale of that ground lease. If an
acceptable ground lease cannot be consummated, Plan payments will
be made through sale of the Property (in either case, a
"Transaction").

On August 19, 2022, the Court entered an Order granting partial
summary judgment in favor of the Debtor wherein the Court allowed
MGP Beacon to recover only amounts in excess of principal and
interest that are amounts: 1) imposed upon, incurred by or asserted
or assessed against MGP Beacon and 2) arising out of or in any way
relating to the loan transaction between the Debtor and MGP Beacon.
After the removal of disallowed fees and costs, the Debtor
estimates MGP Beacon's claim amount is reduced to approximately
$2.9 million.

MGP Beacon's claim has not been allowed and is subject to further
reduction through offset to the extent that the Debtor prevails in
its claims against MGP Beacon in the MGP Beacon Adversary
Proceeding. That matter is set for trial in late January 2023.
Thus, MGP Beacon's allowed claim, if any, will not be determined
until that trial is complete, absent an agreed resolution between
the Debtor and MPG Beacon.

The Plan specifies the time periods within which the Debtor must
consummate a ground lease, otherwise the Debtor will list the
Property for sale. The Plan also provides for use of the proceeds
of loan repayments from MBGco.Biz, LLC and Tziviah and Mark
Goldberg, with such proceeds applying first to Allowed
Administrative Claims then to Class 1 and/or Class 2 claims.

The Class 1 Secured Claim shall be restructured as set forth in the
Plan and paid from the proceeds of the ground lease, the proceeds
of sale of the ground lease, proceeds of loan repayments,
refinance, and/or the proceeds of sale of the Property.

Class 2 Unsecured claims shall be paid as follows. To the extent
that proceeds are available from ground lease rent after payment of
the monthly payment to the Class 1 Secured Claim and Administrative
Claims, 50% of the available ground lease rent will be paid
quarterly to Class 2 Claims pro rata. Class 2 Claims shall be paid
in full from the net proceeds available from the sale of the ground
lease, the Property, or refinance, after payment in full of the
Class 1 Secured Claim.

From Debtor's Loans Receivable and Ground Lease Proceeds, it will
make interest only payments on the Class 1 Claim in the first 12
months following the later of the Effective Date and the date on
which the Class 1 Claim becomes an Allowed Secured Claim. Following
the interest only payment period, the Class 1 Claim will be
amortized over 25 years, and the Debtor will make amortization
payments until 36 months following the Effective Date when the loan
matures.

The Plan provides for Allowed Claims to be paid in full from the
proceeds of either a ground lease or a sale of the Property. The
Reorganized Debtor shall have until February 28, 2023 to enter into
a ground lease that provides for annual lease payments of no less
than $300,000. The Debtor will pay Allowed Claims in full from the
Ground Lease Payments. From each Ground Lease Payment, the Allowed
Class 1 Claim shall be paid the monthly amount due until paid in
full. Fifty percent of each Ground Lease Payment, after payment of
the monthly amount due the Allowed Class 1 Claim, shall be paid pro
rata to unpaid Administrative Claims until paid in full. After
payment in full of the Class 1 Claim and Administrative Claims, up
to 50% of excess ground lease payments will be used make quarterly
distributions on a pro-rata basis on Class 2 Claims until paid in
full. The balance will be held in reserve by the Reorganized
Debtor.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement dated
October 3, 2022, is available at https://bit.ly/3RDnd96 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

        About Water Wind & Sky

Water Wind & Sky, LLC is a domestic limited liability company in
Seattle, Wash.

Water Wind & Sky sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
W.D. Wash. Case No. 22-10752) on May 5, 2022. In the petition
filed by Mark Goldberg, as managing member, Water Wind & Sky listed
as much as $10 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Timothy W. Dore oversees the case.

Armand J. Kornfeld, Esq., at Bush Kornfeld, LLP is the Debtor's
counsel.

According to court documents, Water Wind & Sky has approximately 49
unsecured creditors. The petition states that funds will be
available to unsecured creditors.


WESTBANK HOLDINGS: Nov. 7 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Meredith S. Grabill has entered an order within which
November 7, 2022, at 9:30 A.M. at the United States Bankruptcy
Court, 500 Poydras Street, Courtroom B-709, New Orleans, Louisiana
70130 is the hearing to consider approval of the Disclosure
Statement for Westbank Holdings, LLC, et al.

Judge Grabill further ordered that October 31, 2022 is fixed as the
last day to file objections to the Disclosure Statement.

A copy of the order dated October 3, 2022, is available at
https://bit.ly/3T4cBkx from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                    About Westbank Holdings

Westbank Holdings, LLC is a New Orleans, La.-based company
primarily engaged in renting and leasing real estate properties.

Westbank Holdings and its affiliates filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. La.
Lead Case No. 22-10082) on Jan. 27, 2022. In its petition, Westbank
Holdings listed as much as $50 million in both assets and
liabilities. Joshua Bruno, manager, signed the petition.

Judge Meredith S. Grabill oversees the cases.

Frederick L. Bunol, Esq., at The Derbes Law Firm, LLC, Alvendia
Kelly & Demarest, LLC and G Rowland CPA & Associates serve as the
Debtors' bankruptcy counsel, special counsel and accountant,
respectively. Richard W. Cryar, a partner at F M Reed Company, is
the Debtors' chief restructuring officer.

Dwayne M. Murray, the Chapter 11 trustee appointed in the Debtors'
cases, tapped Fishman Haygood, LLP as counsel and Patrick J. Gros,
CPA, as accountant.


WILLIAMS LAND: Court OKs Cash Collateral Access Thru Oct 26
-----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada authorized
Williams Land Clearing, Grading, and Timber Logger LLC to use cash
collateral on an interim basis in accordance with the budget, with
a 5% variance.

The Debtor needs to use cash collateral to make payment of ordinary
operating expenses.

A review of the North Carolina Secretary of State's UCC filings
reveals these financing statements which might perfect a lien on
the cash collateral:

     a. File # 20200065229K recorded May 29, 2020, in favor of U.S.
Small Business Administration, 2 North Street, Suite 320,
Birmingham, AL 35203

     b. File # 20210063027E recorded May 12, 2021, in favor of
Commercial Credit Group Inc. on behalf of itself and all affiliates
of CCI, 525 N. Tryon Street, Suite 1000, Charlotte, NC 28202.

     c. File # 20210083455A recorded June 22, 2021, in favor of
Commercial Funding Inc. on behalf of itself and on behalf of all
affiliates of CCI, 170 South Main Street, Suite 700, Salt Lake
City, UT 84101.

     d. File # 20210086077E recorded June 28, 2021, in favor of
Commercial Credit Group Inc. on behalf of itself and all affiliates
of CCI, 525 N. Tryon Street, Suite 1000, Charlotte, NC 28202.

     e. File # 20210099242B recorded July 23, 2021, in favor of
Commercial Credit Group Inc. on behalf of itself and all affiliates
of CCI, 525 N. Tryon Street, Suite 1000, Charlotte, NC 28202.

     f. File # 20210112347E recorded on August 18, 2021, in favor
of Corporation Service Company as representative, P.O. Box 2576.
Springfield, IL 62708.

     g. File # 20210122913E recorded on September 9, 2021, in favor
of Corporation Service Company as representative, P.O. Box 2576.
Springfield, IL 62708.

     h. File # 20210138107G recorded October 13, 2021, in favor of
Commercial Credit Group Inc. on behalf of itself and all affiliates
of CCI, 525 N. Tryon Street, Suite 1000, Charlotte, NC 28202.

     i. File # 20220030809H recorded on March 8, 2022, in favor of
CT Corporation System as representative, 330 N Brand Blvd, Suite
700, ATTN: SPRS, Glendale, CA 91203.

     j. File # 20220063407H recorded on May 5, 2022, in favor of
Corporation Service Company as representative, P.O. Box 2576.
Springfield, IL 62708.

     k. File # 20220064143F recorded on May 6, 2022, in favor of
ACE Funding Source, LLC, 360 North Broadway, Jericho, NY 11753.

     l. File # 20220064293A recorded on May 6, 2022, in favor of
TBF, 460 Faraday Avenue, Jackson, NJ 08527.

     m. File # 20220103256E recorded on July 27, 2022, in favor of
Corporation Service Company as representative, P.O. Box 2576.
Springfield, IL 62708.

     n. File # 20220113421K recorded on August 16, 2022, in favor
of Corporation Service Company as representative, P.O. Box 2576.
Springfield, IL 62708.

     o. File # 20220123548M recorded on September 7, 2022, in favor
of Masada Funding, LLC, 20 Jay Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201.

     p. File # 20220126470H recorded on September 14, 2022, in
favor of Franklin Capital Group, LLC, 32300 Northwestern Hwy.,
Farmington Hills, MI 48334.

     q. File # 20220126471J recorded on September 14, 2022, in
favor of Franklin Capital Group, LLC, 32300 Northwestern Hwy.,
Farmington Hills, MI 48334.

M&T Equipment Finance Corporation objected to the Debtor's request.
M&T asserts a lien on the Debtor's cash collateral and is included
in the group of Potential Secured Creditors.

As adequate protection, and to the extent that cash collateral is
used, the Potential Secured Creditors will receive replacement
liens on post-petition cash and inventory to the same extent, and
with the same priority, as their pre-petition perfected liens.

The Debtor's use of cash collateral will expire or terminate on the
earlier of: (i) the Debtor ceasing operations of its business; (ii)
the conversion of the case to Chapter 7; (iii) the appointment of a
Chapter 11 Trustee (but not a subchapter v Trustee); (iv) the
dismissal of the case; (v) the non-compliance or default by the
Debtor with any terms and provisions of the Order; or (vi) October
26, 2022 unless the order is extended by the Court. Any notice of
non-compliance or default will be served upon the Debtor's counsel
only, by electronic mail only, and will be deemed effective upon
dispatch. The Debtor will have five business days to cure any
notice of non-compliance or default.

The Debtor will make an adequate protection payment to CCG in the
amount of $27,500 on its equipment loan prior to October 24, 2022.
The Debtor will make a payment to Keystone Equipment Finance Corp.
in the amount of $2,135 on its equipment loan prior to October 24,
2022.

A further hearing on the matter is set for October 27 at 2 p.m.

A copy of the order and the Debtor's budget is available at
https://bit.ly/3CHaUnU from PacerMonitor.com.

The Debtor projects $1,291,000 in total income and $654,970 in
total expenses.

                  About Williams Land Clearing,
                 Grading, and Timber Logger, LLC

Williams Land Clearing, Grading, and Timber Logger, LLC is a land
development company that logs timber in addition to offering lot
and site clearing, land leveling, drainage solutions, and related
services.  Prior to forming Williams Land in 2016, Lamont Williams,
its sole member, had been in the logging business since 2001, and
added clearing and grading to his business in about 2006.

Williams Land sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 22-02094) on September
16, 2022. In the petition signed by Lamonte Williams, manager, the
Debtor disclosed up to $50 million in assets and up to $10 million
in liabilities.

Judge Pamela W. McAfee oversees the case.

William P. Janvier, Esq., at Stevens Martin Vaughn and Tadych,
PLLC, is the Debtor's counsel.



YU HUA LONG: Unsecureds Slated for 35% to 90% Recovery in Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Deborah J. Saltzman has entered an order approving the First
Amended Chapter 11 Disclosure Statement proposed by Teng Huang of
debtor Yu Hua Long Investments, LLC.

Ballots voting on confirmation of the Plan must be returned no
later than Oct. 21, 2022.

Teng Huang's ballot summary must be filed no later than Oct. 26,
2022.

Any objection to confirmation of the Plan must be filed no later
than Oct. 28, 2022.

Teng Huang's brief in support of confirmation must be filed no
later than Nov. 14, 2022.

The parties' comparison briefs must be filed no later than Nov. 21,
2022.

The status conference in the above case is continued to Dec. 7,
2022.

                        First Amended Plan

Teng Huang submitted a First Amended Liquidating Plan of debtor Yu
Hua Long Investments, LLC.

As of April 30, 2022, the Trustee held $21,362,457 in this Chapter
11 Estate.  The Debtor's business is no longer operating.  The
final plan payment is expected to be paid within two years from the
Effective Date of the Plan.

This Liquidating Plan under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
proposes to pay claims against Yua Hua Long Investment, LLC from
cash on hand that the Chapter 11 Trustee holds as the result of his
sale of the Debtor's real property as the Chapter 11 Trustee
reported to the Court on or about January 17, 2018 to Rykadan 500,
LLC for the sum of $23,400,000.

Non-priority unsecured creditors holding allowed claims will
receive distributions which the proponent of this Plan has valued
at between approximately 35 to 90 cents on the dollar. This Plan
also provides for the payment of administrative and priority
claims; the Estate Representative will establish a reserve of
$2,500,000 for post-confirmation administration.

Class 2 Allowed Non-priority unsecured claims. There are two
categories of similar claims based on Debtor's assumption of debt
from Magnus Sunhill Group, LLC, which are all treated as
Non-Priority unsecured claims to be paid pro rata. The first
category consists of claims based on non-equity-based debt (Claim
Nos. 6, 8, 17, 24 and 27). Teng purchased Claims 8 and 27 from
Daniel Chan and Tina Kwan, respectively, on or about August 15,
2022. The second category consists of claims based on Magnus
equity-based debt (Claim Nos. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,15, 16 and 23).
Individual creditor's claims may be subject to further
reconciliation and adjustment. Each equity security holder (except
Teng) filed claims in the sum of $69,000,000 without consideration
of (1) each equity security holders' proportional interest in
Magnus; (2) Magnus' secured debt; or (3) Magnus' profit, if any.
Holders of Claims Nos. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16 and 23 have not
disclosed to the court or to creditors their proportional interests
in Magnus. Funds not paid to satisfy Class 2 will be distributed
pursuant to the Plan, regardless of whether the Estate
Representative objects or seeks to subordinate claims pursuant to
Section 510(b) or 510(c) of the Bankruptcy Code. No interest
accruing from and after the Petition Date will be paid on Allowed
Non-priority unsecured claims absent the existence of Residual
Funds, in which case interest accruing from and after the Petition
Date at the Federal Judgment Rate shall be paid pro rata to the
extent of available. Class 2 is impaired.

A Status Conference will be held on December 7, 2022 at 11:30 a.m.
in Courtroom 1639,255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California.

Attorneys for Teng Huang:

     Steven R. Fox, Esq.
     Janis G. Abrams, Esq.
     THE FOX LAW CORPORATION, INC.
     17835 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 306
     Encino, CA 91316
     Tel: (818) 774-3545
     Fax: (818) 774-3707
     E-mail: srfox@foxlaw.com
             jabrams@foxlaw.com

A copy of the Order dated September 23, 2022, is available at
https://bit.ly/3feuP4h from PacerMonitor.com.

A copy of the First Amended Liquidating Plan dated September 23,
2022, is available at https://bit.ly/3LJs8UA from
PacerMonitor.com.

                  About Yu Hua Long Investments

Yu Hua Long Investments, LLC, is engaged in the development of real
property located in the City of Monterey Park, California.

Yu Hua Long Investments filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 16-22745) on Sept. 26, 2016, estimating less than $1
million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Deborah J. Saltzman presides over the case.

Timothy J. Yoo was appointed Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor. The
Trustee hired Levene Neale Bender Yoo & Brill, LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; Re/Max Omega as broker; R.Y. Properties, Inc. as real
property consultant; and SLBiggs as accountant.


[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from October 3 to 7, 2022
--------------------------------------------------------

  Company              Ticker    Coupon  Bid Price     Maturity
  -------              ------    ------  ---------     --------
Ahern Rentals Inc      AHEREN      7.375     67.588   5/15/2023
Ahern Rentals Inc      AHEREN      7.375     69.132   5/15/2023
Air Methods Corp       AIRM        8.000     50.293   5/15/2025
Air Methods Corp       AIRM        8.000     50.086   5/15/2025
Audacy Capital Corp    CBSR        6.500     26.512  05/01/2027
Audacy Capital Corp    CBSR        6.750     26.072   3/31/2029
Audacy Capital Corp    CBSR        6.750     24.980   3/31/2029
Avaya Holdings Corp    AVYA        2.250     41.125   6/15/2023
BPZ Resources Inc      BPZR        6.500      3.017  03/01/2049
Bank of America Corp   BAC         2.936     90.647  12/10/2058
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc  BBBY        3.749     29.302  08/01/2024
Buckeye Partners LP    BPL         6.375     80.619   1/22/2078
Buffalo Thunder
  Development
  Authority            BUFLO      11.000     55.527  12/09/2022
Citigroup Global
  Markets Holdings
  Inc/United States    C           3.550     97.902  10/25/2022
Clovis Oncology Inc    CLVS        4.500     57.553  08/01/2024
Diamond Sports Group
  LLC / Diamond
  Sports Finance Co    DSPORT      5.375     22.192   8/15/2026
Diamond Sports Group
  LLC / Diamond
  Sports Finance Co    DSPORT      6.625      7.425   8/15/2027
Diamond Sports Group
  LLC / Diamond
  Sports Finance Co    DSPORT      5.375      7.500   8/15/2026
Diamond Sports Group
  LLC / Diamond
  Sports Finance Co    DSPORT      5.375     21.332   8/15/2026
Diamond Sports Group
  LLC / Diamond
  Sports Finance Co    DSPORT      6.625      7.162   8/15/2027
Diamond Sports Group
  LLC / Diamond
  Sports Finance Co    DSPORT      5.375      7.105   8/15/2026
Diamond Sports Group
  LLC / Diamond
  Sports Finance Co    DSPORT      5.375     22.473   8/15/2026
Diebold Nixdorf Inc    DBD         8.500     47.726   4/15/2024
EnLink Midstream
  Partners LP          ENLK        6.000     75.875         N/A
Energy Conversion
  Devices Inc          ENER        3.000      7.875   6/15/2013
Energy Transfer LP     ET          6.250     82.740         N/A
Envision
  Healthcare Corp      EVHC        8.750     31.921  10/15/2026
Envision
  Healthcare Corp      EVHC        8.750     32.236  10/15/2026
Exela Intermediate
  LLC / Exela
  Finance Inc          EXLINT     11.500     28.522   7/15/2026
Exela Intermediate
  LLC / Exela
  Finance Inc          EXLINT     10.000     65.248   7/15/2023
Exela Intermediate
  LLC / Exela
  Finance Inc          EXLINT     11.500     29.365   7/15/2026
Exela Intermediate
  LLC / Exela
  Finance Inc          EXLINT     10.000     65.248   7/15/2023
Federal Farm Credit
  Banks Funding Corp   FFCB        0.190     99.758  10/13/2022
Federal Farm Credit
  Banks Funding Corp   FFCB        0.070     99.749  10/13/2022
GNC Holdings Inc       GNC         1.500      0.806   8/15/2020
GTT Communications     GTTN        7.875      6.755  12/31/2024
GTT Communications     GTTN        7.875      8.125  12/31/2024
General Electric Co    GE          4.200     80.000         N/A
Goldman Sachs
  Group Inc/The        GS          5.000     94.140         N/A
Hyatt Hotels Corp      H           3.375     97.758   7/15/2023
ION Geophysical Corp   IO          8.000     26.724  12/15/2025
Lannett Co Inc         LCI         7.750     27.378   4/15/2026
Lannett Co Inc         LCI         4.500     29.591  10/01/2026
Lannett Co Inc         LCI         7.750     27.709   4/15/2026
Lightning eMotors Inc  ZEV         7.500     64.000   5/15/2024
MAI Holdings Inc       MAIHLD      9.500     30.359  06/01/2023
MAI Holdings Inc       MAIHLD      9.500     30.359  06/01/2023
MAI Holdings Inc       MAIHLD      9.500     30.359  06/01/2023
MBIA Insurance Corp    MBI        13.772     11.320   1/15/2033
MBIA Insurance Corp    MBI        13.772     11.320   1/15/2033
Morgan Stanley         MS          1.800     68.702   8/27/2036
National CineMedia     NATCIN      5.750     19.370   8/15/2026
OMX Timber Finance
  Investments II LLC   OMX         5.540      0.850   1/29/2020
Party City Holdings    PRTY        6.125     66.115   8/15/2023
Party City Holdings    PRTY        6.125     66.115   8/15/2023
Plains All American
  Pipeline LP          PAA         6.125     83.875         N/A
Quotient Technology    QUOT        1.750     95.125  12/01/2022
Renco Metals Inc       RENCO      11.500     24.875  07/01/2003
Revlon Consumer
  Products Corp        REV         6.250     14.000  08/01/2024
RumbleON Inc           RMBL        6.750     44.308  01/01/2025
Sears Holdings Corp    SHLD        8.000      1.100  12/15/2019
Sears Holdings Corp    SHLD        6.625      6.500  10/15/2018
Sears Holdings Corp    SHLD        6.625      6.050  10/15/2018
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp      SHLD        6.750      2.028   1/15/2028
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp      SHLD        7.000      1.340  06/01/2032
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp      SHLD        6.500      2.000  12/01/2028
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp      SHLD        7.500      1.500  10/15/2027
Shift Technologies Inc SFT         4.750     20.350   5/15/2026
TPC Group Inc          TPCG       10.500     53.437  08/01/2024
TPC Group Inc          TPCG       10.500     53.437  08/01/2024
Terminix Co LLC/The    SERV        7.450    112.379   8/15/2027
Terminix Co LLC/The    SERV        7.250    132.470  03/01/2038
TerraVia Holdings Inc  TVIA        5.000      4.644  10/01/2019
UpHealth Inc           UPH         6.250     31.500   6/15/2026
Wesco Aircraft
  Holdings Inc         WAIR        8.500     52.235  11/15/2024
Wesco Aircraft
  Holdings Inc         WAIR       13.125     31.202  11/15/2027
Wesco Aircraft
  Holdings Inc         WAIR        8.500     52.235  11/15/2024
Wilton Re Finance LLC  WILTON      5.875     87.045   3/30/2033
Wilton Re Finance LLC  WILTON      5.875     87.045   3/30/2033
Wilton Re Finance LLC  WILTON      5.875     87.045   3/30/2033



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa., USA.
Randy Antoni, Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante,
Rousel Elaine Tumanda, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Psyche A. Castillon,
Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and
Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2022.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***