/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/240927.mbx
T R O U B L E D C O M P A N Y R E P O R T E R
Friday, September 27, 2024, Vol. 28, No. 270
Headlines
1 MIN LLC: Seeks Court Approval to Use Cash Collateral
125 MIDWOOD STREET: Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
17701-05 VENTURA: Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
28 W. 36 HERALD: Case Summary & Four Unsecured Creditors
5D CARGO EXPRESS: Unsecureds Owed $3M Will Get 68% over 60 Months
ACADEMY OF KNOWLEDGE: Hires Sagre Law Firm P.A. as Counsel
ACCENT ON BODY: Seeks to Extend Plan Filing Deadline to Oct. 15
ADAPTHEALTH CORP: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'BB-' on Deleveraging
ADOLE GROUP: Seeks to Hire Jacobs P.C. as Attorney
AMBRI INC: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended to March 3, 2025
AVON PRODUCTS: CDS Panel Reviews Deliverable Obligations
AVON PRODUCTS: Creditors Want Insider Settlement Probe Extended
BENHAM ORTHODONTICS: Court Directs U.S. Trustee to Appoint PCO
BIG LOTS: Closes Additional 47 Stores in 19 States
BIG LOTS: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
BL SANTA FE: New Mexico Judge Won't Send HRV Suit to Delaware
BLACKDUCK INC: Hires Gregory K. Stern P.C. as Legal Counsel
BODY DETAILS: Hires Shraiberg Page P.A. as Special Counsel
BOSTON GENERATING: Trustee Loses Appeal Seeking to Claw Back $700M
BRIDGETOPIA LLC: Commences Subchapter V Bankruptcy Process
BRIDGEWATER CASTLE: Seeks Court OK to Obtain $9.75MM From UMB Bank
CADUCEUS PHYSICIANS: Hires Arentfox Schiff LLP as Special Counsel
CARABOBO PROSPER: Seeks Court Approval to Use Cash Collateral
CMM OFFROAD: Hires Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz PLLC as Counsel
COLIBRI: Moody's Alters Outlook on 'B3' CFR to Stable
CONN'S INC: U.S. Trustee Wants Proposed Exec Bonuses Tossed
CPV SHORE: S&P Affirms 'B' Rating on Senior Secured Debt
DEL FUEGO: Hires Golub Lacapra Wilson as Accountant
DETCO INC: Seeks Court Approval to Use Cash Collateral
DIGITAL MEDIA: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
DISH NETWORK: Seeks Dismissal of Suit Over Asset Transfers
EL CHILITO MEXICAN: Sec. 341(a) Meeting of Creditors on Oct. 10
ELETSON HOLDINGS: Court Allows Lenova to Amend Answer
EVOKE PHARMA: Nantahala Capital, 2 Others Hold 10% Equity Stake
EYENOVIA INC: Falls Short of Nasdaq's Bid Price Requirement
FAIR OFFER CASH NOW: Hits Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection
FAIR OFFER: Hires Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz PLLC as Counsel
FAIRFIELD SENTRY: UBS AG Must Face Adversary Case in SDNY
FARELL'S ON ROUND TOP: Seeks Bankruptcy Protection in New York
FIRST QUALITY: TD Bank Seeks to Enforce Cash Collateral Order
FTX TRADING: Reaches Securities Deal With Five State Agencies
GFL SOLID: Moody's Rates New $210MM 2024A Revenue Bonds 'B3'
GLEMAUD MANAGEMENT: U.S. Bank Seeks to Prohibit Access to Cash
GLENSIDE PIZZA: Hires Konstantinos Tzitzifas CPA as Accountant
HAZEL TECHNOLOGIES: Unsecureds Will Get 0% to 100% of Claims
HNO INTERNATIONAL: Posts $496,621 Net Loss in Fiscal Q3
HO WAN KWOK: Owns Daughter's Boyfriend's Motorcycles, Court Says
HOMESPUN LLC: Hires Houlihan Lawrence as Real Estate Broker
HOMESPUN LLC: Hires Sword Law LLC as Special Counsel
HYPERSCALE DATA: Holds 17.1% Equity Stake in Algorhythm Holdings
ILS PRODUCTS: Seeks to Hire Lane Law Firm as Legal Counsel
INVO BIOSCIENCE: Fails to Meet Nasdaq Bid Price Requirement
INVO BIOSCIENCE: Restates Financial Statements Due To SEC Review
IR4C INC: Hits Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection
JACKSON GARDENS: Hires Baker & Associates as Attorney
JBT MAREL: S&P Assigns 'BB' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
JOHAL BROTHERS: Hires Kroger Gardis & Regas LLP as Counsel
JOHNSON ENTERPRISES: Hires Steinberg Shapiro & Clark as Attorney
JOONKO DIVERSITY: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity to Dec. 10
LEE INVESTMENT: Sec. 341(a) Meeting of Creditors on Oct. 15
LEFEVER MATTSON: Sec. 341(a) Meeting of Creditors on Oct. 21
LERETA LLC: Moody's Cuts CFR & Sr. Secured First Lien Debt to Caa1
LIDO 10 LLC: Hires Wiegel Szekel & Frisby as Accountant
LINCOLN HIGHWAY: Starts Subchapter V Bankruptcy Proceeding
LNB-001-13 LLC: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
LW RETAIL: Unsecureds to be Paid in Full in Sale Plan
MACADAMIA BEAUTY: Hires Ross Smith & Binford PC as Counsel
MARCUSE COMPANIES: Submits Three-Month Extended Budget
MARIANAS PROPERTIES: Hires Dentons Bingham as Counsel
MARIANAS PROPERTIES: Hires Gibbins Advisors as Financial Advisor
MARIANAS PROPERTIES: Hires Minakshi V. Hemlani as Local Counsel
MARIANAS PROPERTIES: Pacific Star Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
MARSHALL SPIEGEL: Smith Gambrell Awarded $415,000 in Total Fees
MAVENIR SYSTEMS: Gets $35 Million Funding from Lenders
MBMBA LLC: SARE Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
MCDANIEL LOGGING: Case Summary & Three Unsecured Creditors
MIDWEST CHRISTIAN: Gets Interim OK to Obtain $3M DIP Loan
MIDWEST DOUGH: Calzone King Wins TRO in Franchise Dispute
NAVIENT CORP: Has Student Loan Forgiveness Deal With Puerto Rico
NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS: Signs $9.5MM Asset Sale Agreement With PRN
OCEAN POWER: Reveals First Quarter Fiscal 2025 Results
ONBE INC: S&P Withdraws 'B' Issuer Credit Rating
OPGEN INC: TG Investment Holds 6.3% Equity Stake
PACIFIC LUTHERAN: S&P Affirms 'BB' Long-Term Rating on 2014 Bonds
PATHS PROGRAM: Hires Guidant Law PLC as Bankruptcy Counsel
PAUL FELLER: Ex-Biz Partner Wins $6,750,000 Award
PAVMED INC: Director Sundeep Agrawal Holds 12,195 Common Shares
PENCEL INC: Starts Subchapter V Bankruptcy Proceeding
POST HOLDINGS: S&P Rates New $500MM Senior Unsecured Notes 'B+'
PRIME HARVEST: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended to Nov. 15
PRIMEX CLINICAL: Files Amendment to Disclosure Statement
PROMIENCE HOMES: Sec. 341(a) Meeting of Creditors on October 17
PURDUE PHARMA: Sacklers Settlement Talks Extended to November 2024
QSR STEEL: Seeks to Extend Plan Filing Deadline to Oct. 16
QUICKWAY ESTATES: Hires Bronson Law Offices P.C. as Counsel
RAPTOR AUTO: Plan Filing Deadline Extended to Jan. 8, 2025
RED CLOAK: Seeks to Hire Calaiaro Valencik as Legal Counsel
RENNOVA HEALTH: Revises Stock Exchange Deal With FOXO
ROCKLIN ACADEMY: S&P Affirms 'BB+' LT Rating on 2021A/B Rev. Bonds
ROSSWOOD REALTY: Seeks to Hire Ure Law Firm as Counsel
SAI BABA: Hires Peters Thompson & Christian PA as Accountant
SAM ASH: Clifford Chance Advises Gonher on Acquisition
SCILEX HOLDING: Reaches Agreement With Oramed on Note Payment Terms
SEARS HOLDINGS: Florida Judge Rules in DSG Sublease Dispute
SENSORLOGIC INC: Hires Shimanek Law PLLC as Counsel
SHOMYA TEFILAH: Hits Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection
SIGNATURE BANK: Tax Agency Urges Court to Toss FDIC Tax Refund Bid
SNAP MEDICAL: Hires Mendoza & Associates as Accountant
SOLDIER OPERATING: Seeks to Extend Plan Filing Deadline to Oct. 10
SOLUNA HOLDINGS: Cancels Pre-Paid Advances Under SEPA
SONOMA PHARMACEUTICALS: Amends Equity Distribution Deal With Maxim
SOUTH COAST: Hires Van Horn Law Group as Legal Counsel
STERETT COMPANIES: Seeks Cash Access Extension Thru December 2
STERLING CREDIT: Hires GGG Advisors LLC as Financial Advisor
STEWARD HEALTH CARE: Gets $4.5 Million Stalking Horse Bid
STOOL AND DINETTE: Court OKs Public Auction of Personal Property
SUCCESS VILLAGE: Court Lifts Chapter 11 Stay
SUNPOWER CORP: To Be Delisted From Nasdaq Effective Sept. 30
SUPREME ELECTRICAL: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection
TAG FL LLC: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection in Florida
TEREX CORP: Moody's Affirms 'Ba2' CFR, Outlook Stable
TERRAFORM LABS: Court Clears Liquidation Plan Despite Objections
TERVIS TUMBLER: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
TERVIS TUMBLER: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
THERAPEUTICS MD: Schedules 2024 Annual Meeting for Dec. 5
TRP BRANDS: Seeks to Hire HyperAMS LLC as Consultant
TUPPERWARE BRANDS: Plan Standoff Delays Door-to-Door Workers Pay
UETEK: Amended Plan Clarifies Payroll Tax Claims Pay
ULTRACUTS OF AMERICA: Seeks Court Approval to Use Cash Collateral
VAPOTHERM INC: Closes Merger With Perceptive Advisors
VISION CAPITAL: Hires Theodore N. Stapleton P.C. as Counsel
WARHORSE SH WEST: Case Summary & 16 Unsecured Creditors
WISA TECHNOLOGIES: Gregory Castaldo Holds 8.6% Equity Stake
WISA TECHNOLOGIES: Joseph Reda Holds 8.9% Equity Stake
WORKSPORT LTD: Inks Securities Purchase Deal With Keyser Capital
WRENA LLC: Seeks Court OK of $650,000 Northstar DIP Loan
WYNN RESORTS: Units Issue $800 Million Senior Notes Due 2033
[*] Charles Persons Joins Paul Hastings's Restructuring Practice
[] BOOK REVIEW: Dynamics of Institutional Change
*********
1 MIN LLC: Seeks Court Approval to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------
1 Min LLC, Hotel at Southport LLC and Twelfth Floor, LLC ask the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Washington for
approval for the interim use of cash collateral, ensuring the
Debtors can maintain operations during bankruptcy, provide adequate
protection to lenders, and facilitate the sale of the Hyatt Regency
Lake Washington hotel, ultimately benefiting all stakeholders
involved.
This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Section 1334 and the
matter is a core proceeding. The Debtors filed for bankruptcy to
proceed with a sale of the Hyatt Regency Lake Washington hotel,
which was disrupted by litigation involving EB-5 investors. A
proposed plan aims to pay off claims against Hotel and Mezz Debtors
and distribute approximately $10 million to resolve EB-5 investor
claims.
Hotel and Ownership Structure:
Hotel Debtor: Owns the Hyatt Regency Lake Washington.
Mezz Debtor: Wholly owns Hotel Debtor.
EB-5 Debtor: Wholly owns Mezz Debtor.
Initial EB-5 Financing:
The debt structure for the hotel project is primarily composed of
several financing stages. Initially, Mr. Christ secured the
property in 2000, later leveraging the EB-5 Immigrant Investor
Program to raise $99.5 million from foreign investors. This funding
was formalized through an EB-5 Loan Agreement with the prior owner,
secured by a deed of trust.
Starwood Financing:
In response to unexpected cost overruns, a Delaware entity (Mezz
Debtor) was formed, and in 2017, the project obtained a $51.1
million senior loan and a $21.9 million mezzanine loan from
Starwood. A loan modification shifted obligations from the prior
owner to EB-5 Debtor, consolidating the debt under a new
structure.
Lake Washington Co./AIP Financing:
Further financing in 2019 involved a $90 million senior loan from
Lake Washington Co. and a $40 million mezzanine loan from AIP,
which satisfied previous debts. These loans were secured by the
hotel and its revenues, and subsequent assignments transferred
these loans to new lenders, ensuring the project’s financial
stability throughout its development.
Assignment to WF Trust:
The loan assignments to WF Trust saw both the senior and mezzanine
loans transferred to new lenders, reflecting the ongoing evolution
of the debt structure. This multi-layered financing approach has
been critical in navigating the complexities of the hotel’s
development, allowing it to adapt to financial challenges while
maintaining investor confidence.
The Debtors seek immediate access to Cash Collateral to ensure the
uninterrupted operation of the Hotel, which is essential for
preserving its value and benefiting creditors. Without this access,
the Debtors risk immediate and irreparable harm to their business
operations. They currently lack sufficient working capital and rely
on the Cash Collateral generated from the Hotel’s operations to
cover necessary costs and expenses, all of which are subject to the
Senior Lender's prepetition liens.
The proposed use of Cash Collateral is structured under the terms
consented to by the Senior Lender, aligned with a specified budget.
This budget includes allowed variances for monthly cash receipts
and operating cash disbursements, enabling flexibility in managing
finances. The Debtors plan to provide regular reconciliations to
track any significant variances, ensuring accountability and
transparency throughout the process.
To protect the Senior Lender's interests, the Debtors propose
granting adequate protection in the form of super-priority
administrative claims and liens on the Debtors’ assets. This
includes compensating the lender for any post-petition diminution
in value of its collateral and allowing ongoing operational
expenses to be paid even if incurred pre-petition. The Debtors
believe this arrangement is fair and reasonable, given that all
operational costs will be prioritized over other creditor claims.
The Debtors also outline terms for a "Carve Out," ensuring that
essential administrative expenses and fees are covered, and detail
the conditions under which their right to use Cash Collateral may
terminate. They emphasize the urgency of their request to maintain
operations and protect asset value, and they respectfully ask the
Court to authorize the proposed Cash Collateral use to navigate
their Chapter 11 proceedings effectively.
About 1 Min LLC
1 Min LLC is engaged in activities related to real estate.
The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Wash., Case No. 24-01519) on September
20, 2024. In the petition signed by Michael P. Christ, a member and
CEO, the Debtor disclosed $0 in assets and $122,156,384
liabilities.
James L. Day, Esq. of BUSH KORNFELD LLP represents the Debtor as
legal counsel.
125 MIDWOOD STREET: Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
---------------------------------------------------
125 Midwood Street Partners LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in the
Eastern District of New York. According to court filing, the Debtor
reports $1,415,412 in debt owed to 1 and 49 creditors. The petition
states funds will be available to unsecured creditors.
A meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. Section 341(a) is slated for
October 21, 2024 at 02:00 p.m. in Room Telephonically on telephone
conference line: 1 (866) 919-4760. participant access code:
4081400#.
About 125 Midwood Street Partners LLC
125 Midwood Street Partners LLC is the fee simple owner of the real
property located at 125 Midwood Street, Brooklyn, NY 11225 valued
at $2.41 million.
125 Midwood Street Partners LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 24-43803) on
September 12, 2024. In the petition filed by Yolanda Shivers, as
managing member, the Debtor reports total assets of $2,408,000 and
total liabilities of $1,415,412.
Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Elizabeth S. Stong handles the case.
The Debtor is represented by:
Nnenna Onua, Esq.
MICKINLEY ONUA & ASSOCIATES
26 Court Street
Suite 300
Brooklyn, NY 11242
Tel: 718-522-0236
Fax: 718-701-8309
Email: nonua@mckinleyonua.com
17701-05 VENTURA: Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
-------------------------------------------------
17701-05 Ventura Boulevard LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in the
Central District of California. According to court documents, the
Debtor reports between $1 million and $10 million in debt owed to 1
and 49 creditors. The petition states funds will be available to
unsecured creditors.
A meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. Section 341(a) is slated for
October 15, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. at UST-SVND2, TELEPHONIC MEETING.
CONFERENCE LINE:1-866-820-9498, PARTICIPANT CODE:6468388.
About 17701-05 Ventura Boulevard LLC
17701-05 Ventura Boulevard LLC is a limited liability company.
17701-05 Ventura Boulevard LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 24-11500) on
September 11, 2024. In the petition filed by Joseph Geoula, as
managing member, the Debtor reports estimated assets and
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million each.
The Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Martin R. Barash handles the case.
The Debtor is represented by:
Matthew D. Resnik, Esq.
RHM LAW LLP
17609 Ventura Blvd.
Ste 314
Encino, CA 91316
Tel: (818) 285-0100
Fax: (818) 855-7013
E-mail: matt@rhmfirm.com
28 W. 36 HERALD: Case Summary & Four Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 28 W. 36 Herald Properties, LLC
11 Sunrise Plaza
Valley Stream, NY 11580
Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 25, 2024
Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
Eastern District of New York
Case No.: 24-73697
Judge: Hon. Alan S Trust
Debtor's Counsel: Charles Wertman, Esq.
LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES WERTMAN P.C.
100 Merrick Road Suite 304W
Rockville Centre NY 11570-4807
Tel: (516) 284-0900
Email: charles@cwertmanlaw.com
Total Assets: $0
Total Liabilities: $52,154,331
The petition was signed by David Goldwasser as vice president of
restructuring..
A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's four unsecured creditors is available for free
at PacerMonitor.com at:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/6J5BPBI/28_W_36_HERALD_PROPERTIES_LLC__nyebke-24-73697__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA
5D CARGO EXPRESS: Unsecureds Owed $3M Will Get 68% over 60 Months
-----------------------------------------------------------------
5D Cargo Express, Inc., submitted an Amended Disclosure Statement
describing Amended Plan dated August 22, 2024.
The Debtor is for profit corporation organized under the laws of
the State of Texas on January 26, 2017 by Carlos F. Grajeda to
purchase commercial trucks and trailers on credit to be leased to
and operated by Carlos F. Grajeda's related company, SBC
Transportation, Inc.
Class 3 consists of the Secured Claim of Arvest Equipment Finance
with $246,851.56 allowed secured amount. This Class shall receive a
monthly payment of $4,630.17 with 4.75% interest rate over 60
months.
Class 26 consists of General Unsecured Claims. This Class shall
receive a monthly payment of $25,000 shared prorate for 36 months.
Payments will begin on 26th month and end 60 months. The allowed
unsecured claims total $3,399,677.08. This Class will receive a
distribution of 68% of their allowed claims. This Class is
impaired.
Class 27 consists of the Secured claim of First Business Specialty
Finance LLC. This Class shall receive a monthly payment of
$10,402.09 with 8.25% interest rate over 60 months. The allowed
secured amount total $510,000.00, while the unsecured claim total
$375,212.07.
Class 28 consists of the Secured claim of First Regions Bank d/b/a
Ascentium Capital LLC. This Class shall receive a monthly payment
of $9.083.82 with 8% interest rate over 60 months.
Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
profit from operating the business estimated to be $327.250 per
month for years 1 & 2 and then $372,250 a month for years 3, 4 &
5.
The Plan Proponent's financial projections show that the Debtor
will have an aggregate annual cash flow, after paying operating
expenses and post-confirmation taxes, of $3,927,000 the first year,
$3.927,000 the second year, and $4,457,000 the third, fourth and
fifth years. The final Plan payment is expected to be paid on or
about August 1, 2029.
The Debtor expects to gross the first year $350,000 per month and
after reasonable and necessary expenses will have $325,000 per
month to fund the plan.
A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated August
22, 2024 is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=81Bms7 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.
Counsel to the Debtor:
Steven G. Cennamo, Esq.
Law Office of Cennamo and Werner
8546 Broadway, Suite 100
San Antonio, TX 78217
Tel: (210) 905-0529
Fax: (210) 905-4373
About 5D Cargo Express
5D Cargo Express, Inc. in Laredo, TX, filed its voluntary petition
for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 24-50034) on
March 15, 2024, listing as much as $10 million to $50 million in
both assets and liabilities. Carlos F. Grajeda as president, signed
the petition.
Judge Jeffrey P Norman oversees the case.
The LAW OFFICE OF CENNAMO & WERNER serves as the Debtor's legal
counsel.
ACADEMY OF KNOWLEDGE: Hires Sagre Law Firm P.A. as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
The Academy of Knowledge Learning Center, Inc. seeks approval from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to
employ Sagre Law Firm, P.A. as counsel.
The firm will provide these services:
(a) advise the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties in
the continued management of its business operations;
(b) advise the Debtor with respect to its responsibilities in
complying with the U.S Trustee's Operating Guidelines and Reporting
Requirements and with the rules of the court;
(c) prepare legal papers;
(d) protect the interest of the Debtor in all matters pending
before the court; and
(e) represent the Debtor in negotiations with its creditors in
the preparation of the plan.
The firm will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates. The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.
Ariel Sagre, Esq., president and owner of Sagre Law Firm, disclosed
in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached through:
Ariel Sagre, Esq.
Sagre Law Firm PA
5201 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 892
Miami, FL 33126
Telephone: (305) 266-5999
Facsimile: (305) 265-6223
About The Academy of Knowledge
Learning Center, Inc.
The Academy of Knowledge Learning Center, Inc., filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 24-19093) on Sept.
5, 2024, disclosing under $1 million in both assets and
liabilities. The Debtor is represented by SAGRE LAW FIRM, P.A.
ACCENT ON BODY: Seeks to Extend Plan Filing Deadline to Oct. 15
---------------------------------------------------------------
Accent on Body Cosmetic Surgery, P.C., asked the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to extend its period
to file a Subchapter V Plan to October 15, 2024.
The Debtor is a single-physician, medical professional corporation
in the business of providing elective plastic and reconstructive
surgery to its patients. Dr. James Fernau is the sole owner and
sole physician of the Debtor which employs additional employees.
The Debtor maintains that sufficient cause exists for the extension
of time because the Debtor is diligently completing its tax returns
by the deadline set by the Internal Revenue Service. Counsel for
the Debtor will need time to review the tax return and the
accounting to determine if there are any preference actions against
Dr. Fernau.
In addition, no creditor or party-in-interest is prejudiced by the
extension of this deadline. The Subchapter V Trustee does not
oppose the relief requested in this Motion.
The Debtor further requests that this extension be without
prejudice of the Debtor to seek further extensions of the deadline,
if the Debtor deems it necessary.
Accent on Body Cosmetic Surgery, P.C. is represented by:
David Z. Valencik, Esq.
Calaiaro Valencik
938 Penn Avenue, Suite 501
Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3708
Tel: (412) 232-0930
Fax: (412) 232-3858
Email: dvalencik@c-vlaw.com
About Accent on Body Cosmetic Surgery, P.C.
Accent on Body Cosmetic Surgery, P.C., offers cosmetic surgery
specializing in breast augmentation, rhinoplasty, facelift surgery,
liposuction and body contouring.
Accent on Body Cosmetic Surgery, P.C. in Pittsburgh, PA, filed its
voluntary petition for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case
No. 24-21485) on June 17, 2024, listing $100,000 to $500,000 in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities. Dr. James
Fernau, the president, signed the petition.
CALAIARO VALENCIK serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.
ADAPTHEALTH CORP: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'BB-' on Deleveraging
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on U.S.-based
durable medical equipment provider AdaptHealth Corp. to 'BB-' from
'B+'. At the same time, S&P raised the issue-level rating on
AdaptHealth's senior unsecured debt to 'B+' from 'B'.
S&P said, "Our stable outlook reflects our expectation that
AdaptHealth will maintain its leverage firmly below 4x supported by
our forecast for revenue growth in low- to mid-single-digit percent
area, S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margin in 21%-22% range,
and solid free cash flow generation.
"The upgrade reflects our expectation that AdaptHealth will operate
at lower leverage levels in the near term, reflecting solid
operating performance and its focus on debt repayment."
AdaptHealth's revenue grew 6% in the quarter-ended June 30, 2024
(on a last-12-months basis). Meanwhile the company expanded its
EBITDA margin to 21.5% from about 20% and repaid about $100 million
of debt over the last few quarters. As a result, its S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted leverage improved to 3.6x for the 12-months-ended
June 30, 2024, from 4.3x in the prior year.
S&P said, "While the company reported low-single-digit growth in
the second quarter of 2024, lower than its growth of 6%-7% in the
prior quarters, we believe it stemmed mainly from recent
divestitures and partially from underperformance in its diabetes
segment. The company has indicated it may exit some of its non-core
operations where it does not enjoy benefits of scale and has
lower-than-average profitability. While this could result in
modestly lower sales, we believe the divestitures will have limited
impact on the company's margin profile or our view of its overall
business, which reflects its leading position in home durable
medical equipment (DME) services, established relationships with
referral sources, and its success taking share in sleep therapy."
S&P said, "These factors support our expectation for solid organic
growth, especially in the sleep and respiratory space, despite
weaker performance in its diabetes segment. The diabetes business
has been hurt by payors shifting diabetes patients to dual-benefit
and pharmacy-only suppliers, which has reduced its sales volumes in
2023 and in the first half of 2024. However, we believe this will
be temporary, as the company expands its own pharmacy channels to
adjust its operating model to this shift. We forecast total revenue
growth of about 2.5% in fiscal 2024, improving to approximately 4%
in 2025."
S&P expects further improvement in cash flow metrics.
S&P said, "We forecast free operating cash flow (FOCF) to debt will
improve to 8%-9% in 2024-2025 from below 7% in 2023 and around
breakeven in 2022, incorporating lower interest rates from the
recent amendment. We do not forecast dividends or any significant
acquisitions in our base-case forecast. We believe the company will
continue prioritizing debt repayment over 2024-2025, with only
modest M&A activities resuming in 2026."
The company recently addressed its approaching maturities.
AdaptHealth amended its secured term loan A and revolving credit
facility agreements, extending the maturities to 2029 (subject to
springing maturity covenant), addressing near-term refinancing risk
under its previous maturity schedule. Under the prior credit
agreement, the company's secured debt was set to mature January
2026. Per the amended agreement, the maturity of the term loan A
and revolving credit facility will spring to 2028 if the 2028
senior notes have not been refinanced or repaid in full on or prior
to December 2027, or in the case of a refinancing, a maturity date
is earlier than December 2029.
S&P believes GLP-1s could shrink the company's addressable markets
longer-term, but the timing and magnitude of the impact remain
uncertain.
AdaptHealth generates about 40% of its revenue from sleep apnea
products and about 20% of revenue from diabetes products. Many
patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are also obese and/or
diabetic. The prescription of glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists,
commonly referred to as GLP-1s, to treat type 2 diabetes was
approved by the FDA in 2005 and to treat obesity in 2014. However,
demand for GLP-1s has increased significantly of late because of
their weight loss benefits. S&P believes the prescription of GLP-1s
has the potential to lower obesity levels globally over time and
thus somewhat reduce, over the long term, the OSA and/or diabetic
population. However, variables such as accessibility (given the
current high-cost and limited insurance coverage), pace of
adoption, adherence, and drug side effects will likely determine
how quickly and to what extent GLP-1s will alter market dynamics.
S&P said, "Our stable outlook reflects our expectation that
AdaptHealth will maintain its leverage firmly below 4x, supported
by our forecast for revenue growth in low- to mid-single-digit
percent area, S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margin in 21%-22%
range, and solid cash flow generation."
S&P could lower the rating on AdaptHealth if it believes it will
maintain S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage of more than 4x. This
could occur if:
-- The company adopts a more aggressive financial policy than we
expect; or
-- There are adverse reimbursement changes or the company faces
operating challenges (i.e. supply chain disruptions, product
shortages). This could cause its EBITDA margin to contract and S&P
Global Ratings-adjusted FOCF to debt to decline to 5% or below.
S&P said, "Although unlikely over the next 12 months, we could
upgrade AdaptHealth if we believe it can sustain S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted leverage of 3x or below. Under this scenario, we
would expect stronger EBITDA margins and materially improved free
cash flow generation, with S&P Global Ratings-adjusted FOCF to debt
ratio approaching 15%."
ADOLE GROUP: Seeks to Hire Jacobs P.C. as Attorney
--------------------------------------------------
Adole Group LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York to employ Jacobs P.C. as
attorney.
The firm's services include:
a. advising the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties
as a debtor in possession in the continued management and operation
of its businesses and property.
b. advising and consulting on the conduct of this Chapter 11
case, including all of the legal and administrative requirements of
operating in Chapter 11;
c. taking all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
Debtor's estate;
d. preparing pleadings in connection with this Chapter 11
case;
e. advising the Debtor in connection with any potential sale
of assets;
f. appearing before the Court and any appellate courts to
represent the interests of the Debtor's estate;
g. advising the Debtor regarding tax matters;
h. taking any necessary action on behalf of the Debtor to
negotiate, prepare, and obtain approval of a disclosure statement
and confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan and all documents related
thereto; and
i. performing all other necessary legal services for the
Debtor in connection with the prosecution of this Chapter 11 case.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Partners $1,000 per hour
Counsel $865 to $1,200 per hour
Associates $575 to $715
Paralegals $210 to $300 per hour
The firm was paid an initial retainer in the amount of $15,000.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Leo Jacobs, Esq., a partner at Jacobs P.C., disclosed in a court
filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Leo Jacobs, Esq.
Robert M. Sasloff, Esq.
Jacobs P.C.
595 Madison Avenue, 39th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: (212) 229-0476
Email: leo@jacobspc.com
robert@jacobspc.com
About Adole Group
Adole Group LLC is a single asset real estate (as defined in 11
U.S.C. Section 101(51B)). The Debtor is the owner in fee simple
title of a property located at 68 W 120th St., New York, valued at
$2.89 million.
Adole Group filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 23-10222) on Feb. 15,
2023. In the petition filed by its managing member, Cheryl A.
Smith, MD, the Debtor reported $2,905,200 in total assets and
$1,735,749 in total liabilities.
Judge David S. Jones oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by Jjais A. Forde, Esq., at the Law
Offices of Jjais A. Forde, PLLC.
AMBRI INC: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended to March 3, 2025
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware extended Ambri, Inc.'s exclusive periods
to file a plan of reorganization and obtain acceptance thereof to
March 3, 2025 and April 30, 2025, respectively.
As shared by Troubled Company Reporter, the Debtor filed a Chapter
11 case to continue the process of marketing and selling
substantially all of the Debtor's assets. The Sale closed on July
31, 2024.
The Debtor claims that now that the Sale has closed, substantially
all of the Debtor's assets have been sold, and the Debtor's
business is winding down, the Debtor can turn its focus to bringing
this Chapter 11 Case to a consensual close through confirmation of
a chapter 11 plan of liquidation.
Indeed, since the closing of the Sale, the Debtor has worked
diligently and constructively with the UCC and the Secured Parties
to formulate a chapter 11 plan of liquidation. The Debtor expects
to be able to file such a chapter 11 plan in the near term and,
thereafter, proceed towards confirmation. The Court should provide
the Debtor with additional time to do so.
The Debtor asserts that it is not seeking the extension of the
Exclusive Periods to delay administration of this Chapter 11 Case
or to exert pressure on its creditors, but rather to allow the
Debtor to continue with winding-down its operations, liquidating
any remaining assets for the benefit of creditors, effectuate the
Settlement Term Sheet through the filing and confirmation of a
chapter 11 plan of liquidation, and work to propose a consensual
close of this Chapter 11 Case in the most cost-efficient manner.
Ambri Inc. is represented by:
POTTER ANDERSON COROON LLP
L. Katherine Good, Esq.
Brett M. Haywood, Esq.
Gregory J. Flasser, Esq.
Shannon A. Forshay, Esq.
1313 North Market Street, 6th Floor
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Tel: (302) 984-6000
Facsimile: (302) 658-1192
Email: kgood@potteranderson.com
bhaywood@potteranderson.com
gflasser@potteranderson.com
sforshay@potteranderson.com
About Ambri Inc.
Ambri Inc. specializes in the development of an advanced energy
storage solution through its patented "Liquid MetalTM battery"
technology. Ambri is a pre-revenue Liquid MetalTM battery
technology company working to become a leading global provider of
long-duration, grid-scale, energy storage that can solve the most
critical issues facing today's electricity grid and enable
wide-spread adoption of intermittent renewable energy as a 24-7
power source. The company is developing batteries that are expected
to be low-cost, highly reliable, extremely safe, degrade only
minimally over their lifespan, and can shift fundamentally how
power grids operate and source their power, thereby contributing to
the goal of a cleaner energy future.
The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 24-10952) on May 5, 2024,
with $50 million to $100 million in assets and liabilities. Nora
Murphy, chief financial officer, signed the petition.
Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein presides over the case.
The Debtor tapped POTTER ANDERSON COROON LLP as counsel and GOODWIN
PROCTER LLP as co-bankruptcy counsel.
AVON PRODUCTS: CDS Panel Reviews Deliverable Obligations
--------------------------------------------------------
Luca Casiraghi of Bloomberg News reports that Barclays Bank and
other market participants challenge the Credit Derivatives
Determinations Committee's decision to exclude a $405 million
promissory note payable by Avon Products to Natura from the list of
deliverable obligations, according to a statement.
The promissory note falls within the deliverable obligation
category "bond or loan," according to court filing.
The deadline for resolving challenges is on September 20, 2024 and
the auction is scheduled on September 24, 2024.
About AIO US and Avon Products
AIO US Inc., Avon Products Inc, and some of its affiliates are
manufacturers and marketers of beauty, fashion, and home products
with operations and customers across the globe.
AIO US sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 24-11836) on Aug. 12, 2024. In the
petition filed by Philip J. Gund as chief restructuring officer,
AIO US disclosed $1 billion to $10 billion in assets and debt.
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP are
counsel to the Debtors. Ankura Consulting Group LLC serves as
restructuring advisor to the Debtors. Rothschild & Co US Inc is
the Debtors' investment banker and financial advisor. Epiq
Corporate Restructuring LLC acts as claims and noticing agent to
the Debtors.
AVON PRODUCTS: Creditors Want Insider Settlement Probe Extended
---------------------------------------------------------------
Evan Ochsner of Bloomberg Law reports that junior creditors want
more time to examine a settlement that Avon Products Inc.
negotiated with its parent company just before it filed Chapter
11.
Natura & Co., the parent company, is using Avon Products Inc.'s
bankruptcy to implement a settlement releasing it from legal claims
that Avon could've brought against Brazil-based Natura, creditors
said. The US version of Avon isn't in bankruptcy and is owned by a
different company.
About AIO US and Avon Products
AIO US Inc., Avon Products Inc, and some of its affiliates are
manufacturers and marketers of beauty, fashion, and home products
with operations and customers across the globe.
AIO US sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 24-11836) on Aug. 12, 2024. In the
petition filed by Philip J. Gund as chief restructuring officer,
AIO US disclosed $1 billion to $10 billion in assets and debt.
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP are
counsel to the Debtors. Ankura Consulting Group LLC serves as
restructuring advisor to the Debtors. Rothschild & Co US Inc is
the Debtors' investment banker and financial advisor. Epiq
Corporate Restructuring LLC acts as claims and noticing agent to
the Debtors.
BENHAM ORTHODONTICS: Court Directs U.S. Trustee to Appoint PCO
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Edward Morris of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas directed the U.S. Trustee for Region 6 to appoint
a patient care ombudsman for Benham Orthodontics & Associates, P.A.
The bankruptcy judge finds that the provisions of Section 333(a)(1)
of the Bankruptcy Code for appointment of a patient care ombudsman
apply to Benham Orthodontics & Associates after having filed its
bankruptcy petition, indicating that it operates a health care
business.
Judge Morris further ordered as follows:
* In accordance with Section 333(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code,
a patient care ombudsman shall be appointed in this case to monitor
the quality of patient care and to represent the interests of the
patients;
* The U.S. Trustee is authorized and directed to make such
appointment in accordance with Section 333(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy
Code; and
* The appointed patient care ombudsman shall have all of the
rights and responsibilities provided by Section 333(b) and (c) of
the Bankruptcy Code.
About Benham Orthodontics & Associates
Benham Orthodontics & Associates, P.A. provides orthodontic care to
children and adults. It is based in Colleyville, Texas, and
conducts business under the name Benham Family Orthodontics.
Benham sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Texas Case No. 24-42784) on August 7, 2024, with
up to $50,000 in assets and up to $10 million in liabilities. Adam
Benham, director, signed the petition.
Judge Edward L. Morris presides over the case.
Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq., at Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney, PLLC
represents the Debtor as bankruptcy counsel.
BIG LOTS: Closes Additional 47 Stores in 19 States
--------------------------------------------------
Addy Bink of WFXR reports that nearly 50 additional Big Lots stores
are set to close as the company navigates through its Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection filings.
The Ohio-based company announced earlier this September 2024 that
it planned to sell assets and business operations to a private
equity firm amid the bankruptcy filing.
As part of the process, Big Lots said it plans to close roughly 250
stores by mid-January. That's on top of the nearly 300 stores that
are already on track to close in the coming months.
While it's unclear where exactly those additional stores will be,
we do know the few hundred that have started to shut down. These
stores, since at least early August, have had banners across their
web pages that read "closing this location."
In a court filing last week, Big Lots identified 344 stores it
intended to close. Among those were the nearly 300 locations across
37 states Nexstar identified last month following an analysis of
Big Lots's website.
As of Wednesday, September 18, 2024, the roughly 50 additional
stores included in last week's court filing have "store closing"
banners on their web pages. You can see those Big Lots stores
below:
* Alabama: Andalusia
* Arizona: Apache Junction
* Arkansas: North Little Rock
* Colorado: Westminster
* Florida: Miami (Cutler Bay)
* Idaho: Boise
* Illinois: Champaign
* Indiana: Crawfordsville and Evansville (Town Center)
* Kansas: Olathe
* Kentucky: Madisonville
* Louisiana: Hammond
* Nevada: Henderson (Lake Mead Crossing), Las Vegas (S.
Fort Apache, Paradise, W. Sahara Ave, Southwest Las
Vegas, and Summerlin), Reno (Lemmon Valley and South
Reno)
* New Jersey: East Brunswick, Freehold, North Bergen,
Ocean, Phillipsburg, Union
* New Mexico: Alamogordo
* Ohio: Cincinnati (Cherry Grove)
* Oklahoma: Tulsa (Oakhurst)
* Texas: Austin (Wells Branch), Baytown, Dallas (Park
Forest), Fort Worth (East Fwy), Frisco, Galveston, South
Garland, Groves, Houston (Museum District and Northwest
Houston), Kilgore, Mcallen, Richardson, San Antonio
(Hollywood Park), Stephenville, Terrell
* Utah: Kearns
* Wisconsin: Stevens Point
These locations have banners on their web pages showing closing
sales are "going on now," advising customers they can "save up to
20% off."
Idaho, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas were initially among a
handful of states where there were no planned store closures (Big
Lots has locations in every state except Alaska and Hawaii). That
list has since dwindled to Delaware, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska,
North Dakota, Rhode Island, and West Virginia.
Big Lots President and CEO Bruce Thorn previously said that "the
majority of our store locations are profitable," but that the
company intended to "move forward with a more focused footprint to
ensure that we operate efficiently and are best positioned to serve
our customers."
By closing roughly 550 stores, Big Lots would cut its retail
footprint by about 40%. It's unclear when each store will
officially close its doors.
About Big Lots
Big Lots (NYSE: BIG) -- http://www.biglots.com/-- is one of the
nation's largest closeout retailers focused on extreme value. The
Company is dedicated to being the big difference for a better life
by delivering bargains to brag about on everything for the home,
including furniture, decor, pantry and more. It fulfills its
mission to help customers "Live BIG and Save LOTS" with sourcing
strategies to grow extreme bargains through closeouts,
liquidations, overstocks, private labels, and value-engineered
products. The Big Lots Foundation, together with the Company's
customers, associates, and vendors, has delivered more than $176
million of philanthropic support to critical needs in hunger,
housing, healthcare, and education. On the Web: http://biglots.com/
On Sept. 9, 2024, Big Lots, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries
initiated voluntary Chapter 11 proceedings (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 24-11967). The case is being administered by the Honorable
J. Kate Stickles.
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP is serving as legal counsel, Guggenheim
Securities, LLC, is serving as financial advisor, AlixPartners LLP
is serving as restructuring advisor, and A&G Real Estate Partners
is serving as real estate advisor to the Company. Kroll is the
claims agent.
Kirkland & Ellis is serving as legal counsel to Nexus.
BIG LOTS: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an official committee to
represent unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of Big Lots,
Inc. and its affiliates.
The committee members are:
1. Realty Income Corporation
Attn: Demetri Lahanas
11995 El Camino Real
San Diego, CA 92130
Phone: 858-284-5327
Email: dlahanas@realtyincome.com
2. Blue Owl Real Estate Capital LLC
Attn: Andrew Morris
30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 4140
Chicago, IL 60602
Phone: 773-389-6503
Email: andrew.morris@blueowl.com
3. America’s Realty, LLC
Attn: Robert Waugh
11155 Red Run Blvd., Suite 320
Owings Mills, MD 21117
Phone: 410-653-7630
Fax: 410-653-5676
Email: bwaugh@amrealco.com
4. Zest Garden Limited
Attn: Tim Juang
623 S. Doubleday Avenue
Ontario, CA 91761
Phone: 909-563-1600
Email: tim@zestgarden.com
5. NCR Voyix Corporation (f/k/a NCR Corporation)
Attn: Ashley Thompson, Law Dept.
864 Spring Street, NE
Atlanta, GA 30308
Phone: 770-212-5034
Email: ashley.thompson@ncrvoyix.com
6. Twin Star International, Inc.
Attn: Heather Brown
750 Park of Commerce Blvd., Suite 400
Boca Raton, FL 33487
Phone: 561-252-5700
Email: hbrown@twinstarhome.com
7. Everstar Merchandise Co., Limited
Attn: Joe Lincoln
Unit 12-13, 11/F Harbour Center
Hok Cheung Street, Hung Hom
Hong Kong
Phone: 720-936-4981
Email: joelincoln@everstar.biz
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent. They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.
About Big Lots
Big Lots (NYSE: BIG) -- http://www.biglots.com/-- is one of the
nation's largest closeout retailers focused on extreme value,
delivering bargains on everything for the home, including
furniture, decor, pantry and more.
On Sept. 9, 2024, Big Lots, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries
initiated voluntary Chapter 11 proceedings (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 24-11967). The case is being administered by the
Honorable J. Kate Stickles.
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP is serving as legal counsel, Guggenheim
Securities, LLC is serving as financial advisor, AlixPartners LLP
is serving as restructuring advisor, and A&G Real Estate Partners
is serving as real estate advisor to the Company. Kroll is the
claims agent.
Kirkland & Ellis is serving as legal counsel to Nexus Capital
Management LP.
PNC Bank, National Association, the DIP ABL Agent and Prepetition
ABL Agent, is represented by Choate, Hall & Stewart, LLP; and Blank
Rome, LLP. 1903P Loan Agent, LLC, the DIP Term Agent, and the
Prepetition Term Loan Agent are represented by Otterbourg, P.C. and
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
BL SANTA FE: New Mexico Judge Won't Send HRV Suit to Delaware
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable David T. Thuma of the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the District of New Mexico denied the Defendants' motion to
transfer the venue of the removed adversary proceeding captioned as
HRV SANTA FE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JAY WOLF; JUNIPER INVESTMENT
ADVISORS, LLC; JUNIPER REAL ESTATE, LLC; JUNIPER CAPITAL PARTNERS,
LLC; JUNIPER BISHOPS MANAGER, LLC; JUNIPER BISHOPS, LLC; JUNIPER BL
HOLDCO, LLC; JUNIPER BL PROPCO, LLC; ALEX WALTER; BRAD BROOKS; and
MICHAEL NORVET, Defendants, BL SANTA FE (HOLDING), LLC, Nominal
Defendant, Adv. Proc. 24-01002-t (Bankr. D.N.M.), to the United
States Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware.
Plaintiff opposes the motion.
This dispute involves the Bishops Lodge resort and hotel in Santa
Fe, New Mexico. Before 2021, the Resort was owned and operated by
BL Santa Fe, LLC. Resort Owner, in turn, was wholly owned by BL
Santa Fe (Mezz), LLC, which is wholly owned by BL Santa Fe
(Holding), LLC. Holding is owned principally by four members:
Evolution RE Bishops Lodge, LP; Nunzio DeSantis; BL Resort
Investment, LLC; and HRV Santa Fe, LLC. Evolution, DeSantis, and BL
Resort Investment own more than half of the membership interests in
Holding. From 2017 to December 16, 2020, HRV was the manager of
Holding, Mezz, and Resort Owner. HRV is owned and controlled by
Richard Holland.
According to Judge Thuma, the first basis for transferring venue is
if the transfer is "in the interest of justice."
Different courts have applied different factors to determine what
is in the interest of justice for resolving a change of venue
request. Having considered the factors in those cases, the Court
finds the following factors applicable:
(a) Economics of estate administration;
(b) Presumption in favor of the "home court;"
(c) Judicial efficiency;
(d) Ability to receive a fair trial;
(e) The state's interest in having local controversies decided
within its borders, by those familiar with its laws;
(f) Enforceability of any judgment rendered; and
(g) Plaintiff's original choice of forum
The Court finds Defendants have not carried their burden of proving
that transferring this proceeding to Delaware is in the interest of
justice or would be more convenient for the parties.
Judge Thuma says, "There is no evidence that it would be more
efficient to try the proceeding in Delaware. Because of the jury
trial demand, trial will be in a district court, not a bankruptcy
court. The Delaware bankruptcy court's familiarity with the
Bankruptcy Cases therefore may not be of much assistance. There is
no evidence that one district court could try the proceeding more
efficiently than the other. Further, this proceeding has been
pending in New Mexico longer (seven months) than it took to obtain
plan confirmation in Delaware (two months). The Court has become
quite familiar with both the pending adversary proceeding and the
litigation that took place in the Bankruptcy Cases."
A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=017LV9
About BL Santa Fe
BL Santa Fe, LLC and BL Santa Fe (MEZZ), LLC own and operate
Bishop's Lodge, a luxury resort located at 1297 Bishops Lodge Road,
Santa Fe, N.M.
The Debtors filed petitions for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.
Del. Lead Case No. 21-11190) on Aug. 30, 2021, listing $50 million
to $100 million in both assets and liabilities. Judge Craig T.
Goldblatt oversees the cases.
The Debtors tapped the Law Offices of Frank J. Wright, PLLC and
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as legal counsel, and
ValueScope, Inc. as restructuring advisor. Stretto serves as the
Debtors' claims and noticing agent and administrative advisor.
BLACKDUCK INC: Hires Gregory K. Stern P.C. as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Blackduck, Inc. d/b/a Money Mailer seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois to employ
Gregory K. Stern, P.C. as attorney.
The firm's services include:
a. reviewing assets, liabilities, loan documentation, account
statements, executory contracts and other relevant documentation;
b. preparing list of creditors, list of twenty largest
unsecured creditors, schedules and statement of financial affairs;
c. giving the Debtor legal advice with respect to its powers
and duties as Debtor in Possession in the operation and management
of his financial affairs;
d. assisting the Debtor in the preparation of schedules,
statement of affairs and other necessary documents;
e. preparing applications to employ attorneys, accountants or
other professional persons, motions for turnover, motion for use of
cash collateral, motions for use, sale or lease of property, motion
to assume or reject executory contracts, plan, applications,
motions, complaints, answers, orders, reports, objections to
claims, legal documents and any other necessary pleading in
furtherance of reorganizational goals;
f. negotiating with creditors and other parties in interest,
attending court hearings, meetings of creditors and meetings with
other parties in interest;
g. reviewing proofs of claim and solicitation of creditors'
acceptances of plan; and
h. performing all other legal services for the Debtor, as
Debtor in Possession, which may be necessary or in furtherance of
his reorganizational goals.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Gregory K. Stern $650 per hour
Dennis E. Quaid and Monica C. O'Brien $550 per hour
Rachel S. Sandler $400 per hour
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Gregory K. Stern, Esq., a partner at Gregory K. Stern, P.C.,
disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Gregory K. Stern, Esq.
Dennis E. Quaid, Esq.
Monica C. O'Brien, Esq.
Rachel S. Sandler, Esq.
Gregory K. Stern, P.C.
53 West Jackson Boulevard Suite 1442
Chicago, IL 60604
Tel: (312) 427-1558
Fax: (312) 427-1289
Email: greg@gregstern.com
About Blackduck, Inc. d/b/a Money Mailer
Blackduck, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
N.D. Ill. Case No. 24-13171) on Sept. 6, 2024, disclosing under $1
million in both assets and liabilities. The Debtor is represented
by GREGORY K. STERN, P.C.
BODY DETAILS: Hires Shraiberg Page P.A. as Special Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Body Details LLC, f/k/a Body Details LLLP seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to
employ Shraiberg Page P.A. as special counsel.
The firm will assist the Debtor in selling substantially all of its
business assets as a going concern.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Legal assistants $275 per hour
Attorneys $325 to $650 per hour
John E. Page, Esq. $575 per hour
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
John E. Page, Esq., a partner at Shraiberg Page P.A., disclosed in
a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached at:
John E. Page, Esq.
Eric Pendergraft, Esq.
Shraiberg Page P.A.
2385 NW Executive Center Drive, #300
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Tel: (561) 443-0800
Fax: (561) 998-0047
Email: jpage@slp.law
ependergraft@slp.law
About Body Details LLC, f/k/a Body Details LLLP
Body Details LLC is a laser treatment provider offering hair
removal, tattoo removal and skin rejuvenation services.
Body Details LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 24-17571) on July 26,
2024. In the petition filed by Claudio Sorrentino, as chief
executive officer, the Debtor reports total assets of $8,755,768
and total liabilities of $3,916,734.
The Debtor is represented by Chad Van Horn, Esq. at Van Horn Law
Group, P.A.
BOSTON GENERATING: Trustee Loses Appeal Seeking to Claw Back $700M
------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the
dismissal of all claims asserted by the liquidating trustee of the
BosGen Liquidating Trust, in In re Boston Generating, LLC -- a
matter that has been litigated for over a decade involving
fraudulent conveyance claims arising from a $2 billion leveraged
recapitalization.
The Second Circuit ruled that the Bankruptcy Code's safe harbor
provision for securities contracts payments, 11 U.S.C. Sec. 546(e),
applied to the leveraged buyout and pre-empted the trustee's
state-law fraudulent conveyance claims, which attempted to claw
back approximately $708 million paid to shareholders prior to
BosGen's bankruptcy.
EBG Holdings LLC and its wholly owned subsidiary, Boston Generating
LLC, implemented a leveraged recapitalization transaction several
years prior to BosGen's bankruptcy filing, under which EBG's
members received cash distributions in exchange for their equity
interests in EBG. The transaction included a $925 million tender
offer and a $35 million dividend distribution, which were financed
in large part using two credit facilities entered into by BosGen.
Mark Holliday, the liquidating trustee, as plaintiff-appellant,
seeks to claw back the $708 million BosGen transfer from the
defendants-appellees, who received payments for their equity
securities pursuant to the transaction.
But the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York --
then the District Court -- dismissed the Trustee's fraudulent
conveyance claims on the ground that the Bankruptcy Code's
securities safe harbor provision, 11 U.S.C. Sec. 546, pre-empted
such state law claims.
In an 11-page Summary Order signed Sept. 19, 2024, a three-judge
panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed
the District Court's ruling.
The Second Circuit held that because the $708 million transfer
constitutes a "transfer made . . . in connection with a securities
contract" by a qualifying financial institution, it is entitled as
a matter of law to the protection of Section 546(e)'s safe harbor,
which pre-empts the Trustee's state-law fraudulent conveyance
claims.
The Second Circuit also noted that the Trustee cites no case law to
support its argument that a debtor must be party to a securities
contract in order for the safe harbor provision to apply.
"What it does is it affirms the standard that is continuing to
crystallize, certainly in the Second Circuit, that the safe-harbor
provision will be honored in transactions like this," the Sean
O'Donnell, counsel to the defendants-appellees, noted.
The case took more than a decade to litigate, transferring between
four district court judges throughout that time. Because of the
length of the case, some of the defendant funds, particularly those
that were winding down, settled with the trustee rather than remain
in court, Mr. O'Donnell pointed out.
Law firm Herrick, Feinstein LLP, led by Sean O'Donnell, partner and
co-chair of the firm's Restructuring & Finance Litigation
Department, represented the largest ad hoc group of
defendants-appellees in the case.
Herrick Feinstein represented Ex Orbit, Ltd., Satellite Senior
Income Fund, LLC, CMI Holdings Investments Ltd., Castlerigg
Partners LP, Highland Crusader Offshore Partners LP, Satellite
Asset Management, LP, Sandell Asset Management Corporation,
Satellite Overseas Fund Ltd., The Apogee Fund, Ltd., Satellite Fund
IV, LP, Satellite Overseas Fund V, Ltd., Satellite Overseas Fund
VI, Ltd., Satellite Overseas Fund VIII, Ltd., Satellite Overseas
Fund IX, Ltd., Satellite Fund I, LP, Satellite Fund II, LP, Ex
Orbit Group, Ltd., and Satellite Overseas Fund VII, Ltd.
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, led by Phillip D. Anker,
represented defendants-appellees Credit Suisse Securities (USA)
LLC, et al.
Shearman & Sterling LLP, led by Richard F. Schwed, represented
defendants-appellees The Tudor BVI Global Portfolio L.P., and
related entities.
Reid Collins & Tsai LLP, led by partner Joshua J. Bruckerhoff,
represented the plaintiff-appellant.
About Boston Generating
New York-based Boston Generating, LLC, owned nearly 3,000 megawatts
of mostly modern natural gas-fired power plants in the Boston area.
Privately held Boston Generating was an indirect subsidiary of US
Power Generating Co., and considers itself as the third-largest
fleet of plants in New England.
Boston Generating filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case No. 10-14419) on Aug. 18, 2010. Boston Generating estimated
its assets and debts at more than $1 billion as of the Petition
Date.
EBG Holdings LLC; Fore River Development, LLC; Mystic, LLC; Mystic
Development, LLC; BG New England Power Services, Inc.; and BG
Boston Services, LLC, filed separate Chapter 11 petitions.
D. J. Baker, Esq., at Latham & Watkins LLP, served as bankruptcy
counsel for the Debtors. JPMorgan Securities was the Debtors'
investment banker. Perella Weinberg Partners, LP, was the Debtors'
financial advisor. Brown Rudnick LLP is the Debtors' regulatory
counsel. FTI Consulting, Inc., was the Debtors' restructuring
consultant. Anderson Kill & Olick, P.C., was the Debtors'
conflicts counsel. The Garden City Group, Inc., was the Debtors'
claims agent.
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors tapped the law firm
of Jager Smith P.C. as its counsel.
BRIDGETOPIA LLC: Commences Subchapter V Bankruptcy Process
----------------------------------------------------------
Bridgetopia LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in the Northern
District of Alabama. According to court filing, the Debtor reports
between $1 million and $10 million in debt owed to 1 and 49
creditors. The petition states funds will be available to unsecured
creditors.
A meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. Section 341(a) is slated for
October 17, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. at Creditor Meeting Room Birmingham.
About Bridgetopia LLC
Bridgetopia LLC is part of the residential building construction
industry.
Bridgetopia LLC sought relief under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 24-02788) on Sept.
12, 2024. In the petition filed by Misty Glass, as manager, the
Debtor reports estimated assets and liabilities between $1 million
and $10 million each.
The Honorable Bankruptcy Judge D. Sims Crawford handles the case.
The Debtor is represented by:
Stephen P. Leara, Esq.
SPAIN & GILLON, LLC
505 North 20th Street
Suite 1200 The Financial Center
Birmingham, AL 35203
Tel: (205) 328-4100
Fax: (205) 324-8866
Email: sleara@spain-gillon.com
BRIDGEWATER CASTLE: Seeks Court OK to Obtain $9.75MM From UMB Bank
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bridgewater Castle Rock ALF, LLC asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Colorado for authority to obtain up to $9.75
million in financing from UMB Bank, N.A. and use the lender's cash
collateral.
The debtor-in-possession (DIP) loan will provide liquidity
necessary to meet immediate capital needs and complete the
construction of the company's multifamily senior housing project in
Castle Rock.
The project was financed through a bond issuance of approximately
$38.4 million but the company currently lacks the necessary funds
to resume construction and meet ongoing expenses, according to its
attorney, Keri Riley, Esq., at Kutner Brinen Dickey Riley, P.C.
Meanwhile, Bridgewater will utilize the lender's cash collateral in
alignment with an approved budget, ensuring that funds are managed
appropriately to sustain business operations.
As adequate protection, UMB Bank will be granted first-priority
liens and superpriority claims.
About Bridgewater Castle
Bridgewater Castle Rock ALF, LLC is a single asset real estate
debtor (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).
Bridgewater filed its voluntary petition for relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 24-13319) on
June 14, 2024, listing $10 million to $50 million in both assets
and liabilities. The petition was signed by Steve Jorgenson as
chief executive officer.
Judge Thomas B. Mcnamara oversees the case.
Kutner Brinen Dickey Riley, P.C. represents the Debtor as legal
counsel.
CADUCEUS PHYSICIANS: Hires Arentfox Schiff LLP as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Caduceus Physicians Medical Group seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to employ
Arentfox Schiff LLP as special healthcare counsel.
The firm will provide these services:
a. handling health-care disputes involving the Debtors;
b. general counseling on health care related matters should
they arise;
c. consulting with the Debtors and their bankruptcy counsel in
this case regarding the bankruptcy-related healthcare regulatory
matters as they pertain to the operation of the Debtors' healthcare
business and any contemplated sale;
d. prosecuting health care related actions against connected
with the Debtors' bankruptcy case that the Debtors deem necessary
and the Firm agrees to undertake;
e. appearing, as appropriate, before this Court and other
courts in which matters may be heard and protect the interests of
the Debtors' estates before said courts and the Office of the
United States Trustee; and
f. performing all other necessary healthcare related legal
services in this case requested by the Debtors.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Partners $660 to $1,170 per hour
Counsel $610 to $1,140 per hour
Associates $495 to $725 per hour
Paraprofessionals $195 to $425 per hour
The firm will be paid a retainer in the amount of $ 12,500
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
M. Douglas Flahaut, Esq., a partner at Arentfox Schiff LLP,
disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.
The firm can be reached at:
M. Douglas Flahaut, Esq.
Arentfox Schiff LLP
555 W. Fifth St., 48th Floor,
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Tel: (213) 443-7559
Douglas.Flahaut@afslaw.com
About Caduceus Physicians Medical Group
Caduceus Physicians Medical Group is a physician owned and managed
multi-specialty medical group with locations in Yorba Linda,
Anaheim, Orange, Irvine, and Laguna Beach. The Debtor specializes
in primary care, pediatrics, & urgent care.
Caduceus Physicians Medical Group and Caduceus Medical Services,
LLC concurrently filed their petitions for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 24-11945 and
24-11946, respectively) on August 1, 2024. The petitions were
signed by Howard Grobstein as chief restructuring officer. At the
time of the filing, Caduceus Physicians reported $1 million to $10
million in both assets and liabilities while Caduceus Medical
reported up to $50,000 in both assets and liabilities.
Judge Theodor Albert presides over the cases.
David A. Wood, Esq., at Marshack Hays Wood, LLP represents the
Debtors as legal counsel.
CARABOBO PROSPER: Seeks Court Approval to Use Cash Collateral
-------------------------------------------------------------
Carabobo Prosper Holdings LLC asks U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas Dallas Division for authority to use
cash collateral after initiating a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
on September 19, 2024.
The Debtor continues to manage and operate its business as a
distributor of oil and lubricants to mechanics throughout the State
of Texas as Debtor-In-Possession pursuant to Sections 1107 and 1108
of the Bankruptcy Code. No creditors' committee has been appointed
in this case by the United States Trustee.
The motion outlines the secured positions held by various
creditors, including CFG Merchant Solutions LLC and Toyota
Industries Commercial Finance, which have claims on the Debtor's
accounts receivable, inventory, and equipment. The Debtor
emphasizes the necessity of using cash collateral to cover
essential operating expenses, such as materials and payroll, which
are critical for its ongoing operations and successful
reorganization.
Included in the filing are budget projections for the next 14 and
30 days, which the Debtor deems reasonable for sustaining
operations. Carabobo Prosper Holdings seeks permission to use cash
collateral for these expenses and any unforeseen costs, proposing a
limit of 110% on budgeted expenses, with an allowance for monthly
expenditures not to exceed 5% over the budgeted total.
This motion is categorized as a "First Day Motion," aimed at
addressing immediate financial needs in the Chapter 11 process. The
Debtor requests a hearing to gain court authorization for using
cash collateral as specified and seeks any additional relief the
court finds appropriate.
About Carabobo Prosper
Carabobo Prosper Holdings LLC is a Texas-based distributor of oil
and lubricants serving mechanics throughout the state.
Carabobo Prosper Holdings LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Texas. Case No.
24-32882).Robert C. Lane, signed the petition.
Robert C. Lane Esq. at The Lane Law Firm, PLLC represents the
Debtor as legal counsel.
CMM OFFROAD: Hires Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz PLLC as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
CMM Offroad, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Middle District of Tennesse to employ Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz,
PLLC as its bankruptcy counsel.
The firm's services include:
a. advising the Debtor as to her rights, duties, and powers as
Debtor(s)-in Possession;
b. preparing and filing statements and schedules, plans, and
other documents and pleadings necessary to be filed by the Debtor
in this proceeding;
c. representing the Debtor at all hearings, meetings of
creditors, conferences, trials; and
d. performing such other legal services as may be necessary in
connection with this case.
The firm has received a total of $16,738 as a retainer.
The firm will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates. The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.
Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz is a "disinterested person" as defined in
Bankruptcy Code Secs 101(14) and 327, according to court filings.
The firm can be reached through:
Jay R. Lefkovitz, Esq.
LEFKOVITZ & LEFKOVITZ, PLLC
908 Harpeth Valley Place
Nashville, TN 37221
Tel: (615) 256-8300
Fax: (615) 255-4516
Email: jlefkovitz@lefkovitz.com
About CMM Offroad, LLC
CMM Offroad LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
M.D. Tenn. Case No. 24-03493) on Sept. 11, 2024, disclosing under
$1 million in both assets and liabilities. The Debtor is
represented by LEFKOVITZ & LEFKOVITZ.
COLIBRI: Moody's Alters Outlook on 'B3' CFR to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings affirmed McKissock Investment Holdings, LLC's
(Colibri) B3 Corporate Family Rating and B3-PD Probability of
Default Rating. Concurrently, Moody's affirmed the B3 rating on
Colibri's existing senior secured bank credit facility that
consists of a $70 million revolver expiring March 2027 and $1.16
billion first lien term loan due March 2029. Moody's also changed
the outlook to stable from positive.
The change in outlook to stable from positive reflects Colibri's
continued low free cash flow and high leverage. Colibri's flat
revenue performance and earnings contraction in the first half of
2024, below Moody's previous expectations, and uncertainty around
the recovery timeline of segments dependent on interest rates
moderating are likely to maintain free cash flow and leverage at
levels more consistent with the current rating over the next year.
In the year to date period ending June 30, 2024, Colibri reported
about $237 million of pro forma revenue, a 0.3% decline over the
prior period. The real estate segment continues to experience
headwinds driven by soft qualifying education (QE) volumes. The
accounting segment was hurt by a recent change to the CPA Evolution
exam though Colibri's curriculum adjustments will likely make the
impact temporary, and the company partially mitigated the impact
through the addition of new customers and growth of continuing
professional education (CPE) volumes. The healthcare segment,
despite several headwinds, along with the financial services
segment contributed to top line growth, albeit not fully offsetting
losses in the other segments. The company's reported EBITDA for the
comparable period was down 10.8% as a result of higher marketing
investments, payroll and integration costs. The company is working
through several cost management initiatives to improve efficiency
and reduce operational costs, such as a reduction in travel &
entertainment expenses, optimization of sale processes, and
leveraging technology to automate processes. Credit metrics have
weakened this year with debt-to-EBITDA leverage increasing above 7x
as of June 30, 2024. Moody's now anticipate that debt-to-EBITDA
leverage will remain elevated above 6x in 2025.
Moody's affirmed the ratings because Colibri continues to maintain
adequate liquidity and Moody's expect EBITDA margin will benefit in
2025 from the company's operating initiatives, cost savings are
realized, and one-time costs associated with the acquisitions of
TRC and Simple Nursing are wound down. Moody's forecast that
Colibri will grow earnings, generate moderately positive free cash
flow of $15 to $20 million in 2025, and reduce leverage to a mid 6x
range in 2025.
RATINGS RATIONALE
The B3 CFR reflects Colibri's modest scale in a competitive and
fragmented market for professional certification and continuing
education services, high leverage, and low free cash flow. Moody's
believe Colibri's market position is well established, and the
company demonstrates the ability to grow both organically and
through tuck-in acquisitions. Acquisitions have helped Colibri
diversify its end market verticals beyond real estate and valuation
services, with growing positions in healthcare, accounting and
financial services that Moody's consider less vulnerable to
economic cycles. The company's services for professional
certifications are considered non-discretionary relative to the
more volatile demand of discretionary education services. Moody's
forecast annual revenue growth in the low to mid-single digit range
in 2025 and beyond, largely reflecting additional volume from the
healthcare vertical as well as upselling & cross-selling
opportunities to Colibri's customers. Moody's view further
diversification of verticals as positive, although execution risk
remains high, as the company's growth strategy will continue to be
focused on debt and cash funded tuck-in acquisitions. Event risk is
also high, given that the latest acquisitions were partially funded
with PIK preferred and convertible instruments. There is elevated
potential for Colibri to issue lower-priced debt to avoid the high
return hurdle created by the PIK instruments. However, impairment
of preferred equity instruments is not considered a default by
Moody's definition which reduces the risk of a distressed
exchange.
Colibri's liquidity is adequate with $11 million of balance sheet
cash as of June 30, 2024, full availability of the $70 million
revolving credit facility that expires in March 2027 and
expectations of $15 to $20 million of annual free cash flow in
2025. The free cash flow will be largely utilized to fund a
deferred consideration installment due in 2024 and $11.6 million of
annual term loan amortization. The revolver is subject to a
springing first lien 8x net leverage covenant when utilization
exceeds 35%. Moody's do not expect the covenant to spring into
effect over the next 12 months, but if it does the company should
have good cushion. The first lien term loan does not have any
financial maintenance covenants.
Colibri has two series of preferred stock that were issued by
holding companies that do not guarantee the credit facility and the
preferred stock does not have upstream guarantees. The credit
facility does not cross default to the preferred stock, and the
preferred stock only has an equity claim in bankruptcy and only one
of the two series of preferred stock has a pay-in-kind (PIK)
dividend accretion. Moody's view the preferred stock instruments as
equity in Moody's credit metric calculations, but the instruments
pose event risk. Since the preferred stock is held by third parties
that have a priority equity claim ahead of Gridiron Capital's
common equity and there is a high PIK rate on one class of
preferred stock, Moody's believe there is event risk. There is
potential that at some point Gridiron may choose to replace the
instruments with lower-priced debt to avoid the high return hurdle
created by the PIK instrument. The intent is likely to redeem the
preferred stock through a sale of the company or initial public
offering, but this could be challenging if public equity market
conditions are soft or the company does not generate strong
growth.
FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS
The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the company
will improve its operating performance leading to improving credit
metrics and modestly positive free cash flow over the next 12
months while maintaining adequate liquidity.
The ratings could be upgraded if Colibri delivers sustained revenue
and earnings growth, sustains free cash flow-to-debt above 5% and
sustains debt-to-EBITDA below 6.5x. The company would also need to
maintain a more conservative financial policy consistent with
maintaining credit metrics at the aforementioned levels.
The ratings could be downgraded if revenue and earnings deteriorate
due to factors such as lower volume, customer losses, or higher
costs, EBITA-to-interest expense is below 1x, or the company
generates weak or negative free cash flow. A deterioration in
liquidity including increasing revolver usage or a more aggressive
financial policy could also lead to a downgrade.
McKissock Investment Holdings (Colibri, headquartered in St. Louis,
Missouri) is a provider of professional education solutions across
six core end markets including accounting, real estate, financial
services, healthcare, valuation & property services (VPS) and
teaching. The solutions support continuing education (CE) and
qualifying education (QE) required for professionals to pursue and
maintain their licenses. The company operates a portfolio of 20+
brands that span business-to-business (B2B) and
business-to-consumer (B2C) services. Colibri was acquired by a
private equity firm Gridiron Capital in May 2019. The company was a
pioneer of online professional education, introducing some of the
first online-based professional education courses in 2001. Pro
forma revenue for the last 12 months ended June 30, 2024 were
approximately $467 million.
The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Services published in November 2021.
CONN'S INC: U.S. Trustee Wants Proposed Exec Bonuses Tossed
-----------------------------------------------------------
Yun Park of Law360 Bankruptcy Authority reports that the U.S.
Trustee's Office urged a Texas bankruptcy judge on Friday,
September 20, 2024, to reject bonuses that retailer Conn's wants to
pay executives if it reaches key goals in its Chapter 11 case,
saying the awards would amount to an impermissible "pay to stay"
retention plan because the debtor's restructuring professionals are
the ones responsible for meeting such targets.
About Conn's, Inc.
Conn's, Inc., is a retailer of home goods and furniture in The
Woodlands, Texas.
Conn's and its affiliates sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Lead Case No. 24-33357) on
July 23, 2024. In its petition, Conn's reported $1 billion to $10
billion in both assets and liabilities.
Judge Jeffrey P. Norman oversees the cases.
The Debtors tapped Duston K. McFaul, Esq., at Sidley Austin, LLP as
legal counsel; Houlihan Lokey, Inc. as investment banker; and BRG
Capital Advisors, LLC as interim management services provider. Epiq
Corporate Restructuring, LLC, is the Debtors' notice and claims
agent.
CPV SHORE: S&P Affirms 'B' Rating on Senior Secured Debt
--------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised the outlook to stable from negative and
affirmed its 'B' rating on CPV Shore Holdings LLC's (CPV Shore or
the project) senior secured debt.
At the same time, S&P revised the recovery rating on the debt to
'2' from '3'. A recovery rating of '2' indicates its expectation
for substantial (70%-90%; rounded estimate: 75%) recovery in the
event of default. The revision is spurred by a higher cleared
capacity price in the 2025-2026 auction and a reduced amount on the
revolving credit facility (RCF), which was extended in November
2023.
The stable outlook reflects S&P's forecast of improved debt service
coverage ratios (DSCRs), with a minimum DSCR of 1.16x throughout
the life of the asset. This improvement is mainly due to a better
long-term capacity price outlook, partially offset by higher
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) costs.
The Woodbridge Energy Center (Woodbridge or the plant) is a
725-megawatt (MW) combined-cycle gas-fired power plant in Middlesex
County, N.J., in the Eastern Mid-Atlantic Area Council (EMAAC) zone
of PJM Interconnection LLC (PJM). Woodbridge is owned by CPV Shore,
which itself is owned by CPV Shore Investment LLC (37.53%), Toyota
Tsusho Shore LLC (31.25%), Osaka Gas Shore LLC (20%), and John
Hancock Life Insurance Co. (U.S.A.) (11.22%).
DSCR forecast improves due to recent PJM capacity market momentum.
S&P said, "We project improved DSCRs will be spurred by favorable
future expectations in the PJM EMAAC capacity market. The cleared
capacity price of $269.92 per megawatt day (/MW-day) for the
2025/2026 period represents a significant increase--more than five
times the 2024/2025 auction results. Although the upside is
partially offset by higher RGGI costs, we expect DSCRs will improve
in the long term.
"In the near term, from third-quarter 2024 to second-quarter 2025,
we anticipate a temporary dip in DSCR due to the current depressed
capacity prices and elevated RGGI costs. However, we project DSCR
will recover starting in mid-2025 as the higher cleared capacity
prices take effect. As a result, we expect CPV Shore will increase
cash sweeps, especially in the latter half of 2025, prior to the
TLB maturity. We anticipate the TLB balance at maturity will be
approximately $340 million.
"With the expectation that higher load growth in PJM will likely
continue to accelerate, we forecast that the 2026/2027 delivery
year EMAAC capacity price will be $200/MW-day. We believe that the
EMAAC capacity price should revert to the $165/MW-day area in the
long term. With our revised long-term capacity price assumptions,
and accounting for ongoing elevated RGGI costs, we project a
minimum DSCR of 1.16x post-refinancing, an improvement from our
previous forecast of 1.08x."
Refinancing risk is manageable, given the market outlook.
S&P said, "We expect CPV Shore will refinance its TLB and RCF
maturing in 2025, supported by an improved capacity market and
anticipated drop in interest rates, partially offset by higher RGGI
costs. In addition, CPV Shore successfully extended its RCF in
November 2023, despite higher market uncertainty and depressed
capacity prices at the time. The project secured $95 million with
more lender-friendly terms. We view this positively and expect the
project will be able to refinance its TLB and RCF under the current
market conditions as they mature in 2025.
"Historical performance was in line with our expectations.
"CPV Shore's operational and financial performance in 2023 and in
the first half of 2024 was in line with our expectations. During
this period, the project swept $7.5 million toward debt paydown,
meeting our forecast cash sweep. Post-hedging, the project realized
clean spark spreads of $8.40 per megawatt-hour (/MWh) in 2023 and
$7.30/MWh in the first half of 2024. Operationally, CPV Shore
maintained an availability factor of 83% in 2023 as a result of the
scheduled two-month outage, and 92% in the first half of 2024. The
project operated at a capacity factor of approximately 60% during
both periods.
"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that CPV Shore will
generate DSCRs of about 1.16x on a rolling 12-month basis by June
2025, and about 2.0x by December 2025. We also expect the minimum
DSCR will remain above 1.16x during the project's life, which
includes the post-refinancing period (2025-2040).
"We could lower our rating if our view of the project's ability to
refinance its debt due in 2025 deteriorates. We would also consider
a negative rating action if the project's cash flow sweeps were
materially lower than our forecast of approximately $20 million
until the TLB maturity, which would increase the residual TLB
balance to more than $340 million at maturity, and potentially
weaken projected DSCRs in the post-refinancing period. This could
stem from lower-than-expected capacity factors, weaker energy
margins, higher-than-anticipated RGGI costs, or unplanned outages
that require a full plant shutdown for an extended period.
"We would consider raising the rating if we believe the project
will achieve a minimum DSCR of at least 1.20x throughout the life
of the debt, including the post-refinancing period (2025-2040). We
would expect this to occur via significant improvements in debt
paydown if the project's realized clean spark spreads increase, or
if uncleared capacity prices in PJM's EMAAC zone improved while the
project realizes favorable capacity factors. This would result in
higher cash flow available for debt service, leading to a
lower-than-anticipated TLB balance at maturity."
DEL FUEGO: Hires Golub Lacapra Wilson as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------
Del Fuego Paradise LLLP seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Florida to employ Golub,
LaCapra, Wilson & DeTiberiis, LLP as accountant.
The firm will provide these services:
a. render business advisory services and ongoing consulting
and advising regarding lenders;
b. preparation of various financial schedules and
presentations; and
c. analyze various revenue generating and cost reduction
options for the company.
The firm will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates. The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.
Jacquelyn Varga, CPA, a partner at Golub, Lacapra, Wilson &
Detiberiis, disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Jacquelyn Varga, CPA
Golub, LaCapra, Wilson & DeTiberiis, LLP
2 Roosevelt Ave
Port Jefferson Station, New York 11776
Tel: (631) 331-0515
Fax: (631) 331-0583
Email: brian@glwdcpa.com
About Del Fuego Paradise LLLP
Del Fuego Paradise, LLLP in Delray Beach, FL, filed its voluntary
petition for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
24-14934) on May 20, 2024, listing $5,500 in assets and $4,580,433
in liabilities. Daniel Murphy, Power of Attorney for Joseph
DiNicole, Partner, signed the petition.
Judge Mindy A. Mora oversees the case.
KELLEY KAPLAN & ELLER, PLLC serve as the Debtor's legal counsel.
DETCO INC: Seeks Court Approval to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------
Detco, Inc. asks U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Arkansas for authority to use cash collateral generated from its
post-petition receivables.
This is essential for the company to meet its working capital needs
and continue operations during its Chapter 11 bankruptcy case.
Additionally, the motion aims to provide adequate protection to WBL
SPO I, LLC, the creditor with a secured claim, by proposing monthly
payments to mitigate any potential loss in value of the
collateral.
The Debtor entered into a Business Promissory Note and Security
Agreement with World Business Lenders, LLC on August 17, 2022,
securing a loan of amount $1,200,000. This agreement includes an
interest rate of approximately 0.07397% per day, with a series of
interest-only payments due until February 2024, when a final
balloon payment is scheduled. WBL subsequently assigned its rights
under this agreement to WBL SPO I, LLC, which now holds an
estimated secured claim of $1,564,636.59 against the Debtor.
The Debtor has an immediate need to use the Cash Collateral in
order to continue its operation and maintain the value of the
estate during the pendency of this case. In the motion, Detco
proposes making monthly adequate protection payments of $13,690.57
to WBL SPO I, LLC. These payments will be made until either a plan
of reorganization is confirmed, the case is converted to Chapter 7,
or the case is dismissed. The first payment is scheduled for
October 1, 2024. These payments are designed to protect WBL's
interests in the collateral, minimizing any post-petition
depreciation.
Furthermore, the Debtor asserts that allowing access to the cash
collateral is in the best interest of all parties involved. It
emphasizes that the proposed adequate protection measures are
sufficient to mitigate any risks associated with the use of the
collateral during the bankruptcy proceedings. The motion includes a
request for a hearing to expedite the approval process, as
immediate access to cash is deemed critical for ongoing
operations.
Overall, Detco, Inc. seeks the court's approval to use cash
collateral and implement adequate protection for WBL SPO I, LLC, as
part of its strategy to navigate through bankruptcy and maintain
operational stability. The Debtor believes that these measures are
essential not only for its survival but also for maximizing the
value of its estate for the benefit of all creditors.
About Detco Inc.
The Debtor owns a 207,781 sq. ft. building located on 4.77 acres
located in Greene County at 1810 U.S. 49, Paragould, AR 72450. This
commercial property, on which the Debtor's convenience store &
service station are located, has an appraised value of $2.1
million.
Detco Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Ark. Case No. 24-12775) on Aug. 26,
2024. In the petition signed by David Detlefsen, chairman, the
Debtor disclosed $2,766,656 in assets and $1,615,389 in
liabilities.
Judge Phyllis M. Jones presides over the case.
Dilks Law Firm serves as the Debtor's counsel.
The firm can be reached through:
Frank H. Falkner, Esq.
Lyndsey D. Dilks, Esq.
Dilks Law Firm
P.O. Box 34157
Little Rock, AR 72203
Telephone: (501) 244-9770
Facsimile: (888) 689-7626
Email: frank@dilkslawfirm.com
ldilks@dilkslawfirm.com
DIGITAL MEDIA: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 7 appointed an official committee to
represent unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of Digital
Media Solutions, Inc. and its affiliates.
The committee members are:
1. QuoteWizard.com LLC
Valentyna DeCristo, Deputy GC
1415 Vantage Park Drive, Suite 700
Charlotte, NC 28203
(704) 968-1062
Valentyna.DeCristo@lendingtree.com
2. All Web Leads, Inc.
Chad Bradford, CFO
9004 Anderson Mill Road, Unit A
Austin, TX 78729
(817) 683-1404
chad.bradford@awl.com
Counsel:
Andrew Currie
Venable LLP
750 East Pratt Street, Suite 900
Baltimore, MD 21202
(410) 244-7603
AJCurrie@Venable.co
3. QuinStreet, Inc.
Marty Collins, Chief Legal Officer
950 Tower Lane, 12th Floor
Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 906-0077
mcollins@quinstreet.com
Counsel:
Andrew Currie
Venable, LLP
600 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 344-4586
AJCurrie@venable.com
4. Adsync Media, LLC
Howard Bruck, COO/CFO
1200 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1950
Miami, FL 33131
(305) 988-5680
howard@adsyncmedia.com
Counsel:
Brent A. Friedman, PA
Brent Friedman
78 SW 7th Street, 5th Floor
Miami, FL 33130
(305) 562-6800
brent@brentafriedman.com
5. Archer Education
Michael Briskey, CFO
10975 Benson Drive, Suite 150
Overland Park, KS 66210
(972) 679-7629
mbriskey@archeredu.com
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent. They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.
About Digital Media Solutions
Founded in 2012, Digital Media Solutions, Inc. is a
technology-enabled digital advertising company in Clearwater, Fla.,
that leverages its advanced technology and proprietary customer
data to efficiently and effectively connect its customers with
their target consumers. As of Sept. 11, 2024, DMS and its
affiliates operate in at least 15 countries and territories around
the world and employ 247 individuals in The United States and
Canada.
DMS and 36 affiliates commenced voluntary Chapter 11 proceedings
(Bankr. N.D. Texas Lead Case No. 24-90468) on Sept. 11, 2024. At
the time of the filing, DMS reported $100 million to $500 million
in both assets and liabilities.
Judge Alfredo R. Perez oversees the cases.
The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis, LLP and Porter Hedges, LLP as
legal counsel; Portage Point Partners as restructuring advisor; and
Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. as investment banker. Omni Agent
Solutions is the claims agent.
DISH NETWORK: Seeks Dismissal of Suit Over Asset Transfers
----------------------------------------------------------
Satellite-TV provider Dish Network LLC is seeking dismissal of a
lawsuit filed by bondholders over a controversial transfer of
assets.
In court filings dated Sept. 25, 2024, Dish Network LLC, et al.,
ask the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
to dismiss the amended complaint filed by U.S. Bank Trust Company,
N.A., on behalf of bondholders.
Dish asserts that the plaintiffs had failed to assert any
well-pled, non-conclusory facts to support their allegation that
the asset transfers breached the indentures.
"[T]he law is clear that dismissal is appropriate where there are
no well-pled allegations supporting Plaintiffs' claims, or where
those claims are refuted by the documents incorporated in the
complaint, as they are here," Dish stated.
Refuting bondholders' allegation that the Intercompany Loan was
DBS's sole asset, the defendants point out that DBS had assets in
excess of $21 billion, so the Tranche A portion of the Intercompany
Loan constituted only 22% of the Company's overall asset base,
nowhere close to "all or substantially all."
Qualitatively, there has neither been a fundamental change in the
nature of DBS's business, nor is the Intercompany Loan DBS's "crown
jewel." At the time of the transactions, DBS was an
indirect-holding company of its parent-entity, non-party DISH, and
held 8 million pay-tv subscribers, various operating assets (such
as orbital satellites, wireless spectrum licenses, real property,
among others), as well as the Intercompany Loan. Today, DBS holds
approximately five million subscribers, the same miscellaneous
operating assets, and the Tranche B portion of the Intercompany
Loan. DBS, therefore, has the same existence, purpose, and
business as it had both before and after the Intercompany Loan
Transaction.
Dish also argues that the bondholders had failed to plead any of
the three elements required to sustain constructive fraud claims.
It noted that DBS was not left with "unreasonably small assets"
after the transactions, such that it was left with insufficient
assets to sustain its operations.
Dish avers that that DBS continues to hold assets in excess of $12
billion, more than half of what it held before the transactions.
It adds that plaintiffs have not shown that DBS was unable to pay
its debts at the time of the transactions. The "going concern"
qualification in the Company's Form 10-K has no bearing on whether
DBS was unable to pay its debts at the time of the transfers, Dish
claims. DBS continues to hold assets in excess of $12 billion,
more than half of what it held before the transaction, according to
Dish.
In U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, in its capacities
as Trustees, Plaintiffs, v. DISH DBS CORPORATION, DISH NETWORK
L.L.C., ECHOSTAR INTERCOMPANY RECEIVABLE COMPANY L.L.C., DISH DBS
ISSUER LLC, and DBS INTERCOMPANY RECEIVABLE L.L.C., Defendants,
Case No. 1:24-cv-3646 (JGLC), S.D.N.Y., filed in April 2024, U.S.
Bank, on behalf of a group of bondholders, demands for Dish to undo
a series of collateral transfers it made earlier in the year to
move assets out of reach of bondholders. A copy of the amended
complaint filed on July 18, 2024, is available at
https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/S6GUMJI/US_Bank_Trust_Company_National_v_DISH_DBS_Corporation_et_al__nysdce-24-03646__0024.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA
Dish, which is seeking to transition from pay-TV to wireless
services, had transferred a handful of wireless spectrum licenses
into a new legal entity and freed a new unit holding 3 million
television subscribers from debt covenants, as part of an effort to
address its debt stack.
White & Case and Houlihan Lokey Inc. are representing the Company.
Lazard Inc. and Milbank LLP are advising the investors.
About Dish Network
DISH Network L.L.C., a subsidiary of EchoStar, provides
multichannel television and satellite television via DISH Network
as well as over-the-top IPTV services via Sling TV.
EchoStar Corporation (Nasdaq: SATS) on Jan. 2, 2024, announced the
completion of its acquisition of DISH Network Corporation. To
complete the acquisition, a wholly owned subsidiary of EchoStar
merged with and into DISH Network, with DISH Network surviving the
merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of EchoStar.
Shortly after EchoStar completed its $26 billion acquisition of
Dish, the company warned investors that its prospects were
uncertain. In a 10-K form filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on Feb. 29, EchoStar reported its debt load raised
"substantial doubts about its ability to continue as a going
concern."
Dish is saddled with $20 billion in debt and has $1.98 billion in
debt set to mature on Nov. 15, 2024.
EL CHILITO MEXICAN: Sec. 341(a) Meeting of Creditors on Oct. 10
---------------------------------------------------------------
El Chilito Mexican Food Inc. filed Chapter 11 protection in the
Central District of California. According to court filing, the
Debtor reports between $1 million and $10 million in debt owed to 1
and 49 creditors.
A meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. Section 341(a) is slated for
October 10, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. at UST-SVND2, TELEPHONIC MEETING.
CONFERENCE LINE:1-866-820-9498, PARTICIPANT CODE: 6468388.
About El Chilito Mexican Food Inc.
El Chilito Mexican Food Inc. is a local taqueria serving a
delicious selection of Tex-Mex and interior Mexican style tacos,
coffee, frozen sangria/mimosas, and draft beer.
El Chilito Mexican Food Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 24-11032) on
September 11, 2024.
Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Ronald A. Clifford III oversees the
case.
The Debtor is represented by:
Matthew D. Resnik, Esq.
RMH LAW LLP
17609 Ventura Blvd., Suite 314
Encino, CA 91316
Tel: (818) 285-0100
Fax: (818) 855-7013
Email: matt@rhmfirm.com
ELETSON HOLDINGS: Court Allows Lenova to Amend Answer
-----------------------------------------------------
Judge Lewis J. Liman of the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York granted Levona Holdings, Ltd.'s
motion for leave to file an amended answer to the operative
petition of Eletson Holdings Inc. and Eletson Corporation to
confirm the final arbitration award issued by the Honorable Ariel
Belen of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. on
September 29, 2023, and an amended cross-petition to vacate the
award.
The parties dispute control over a joint venture, non-party Eletson
Gas LLC, which was formed in 2013 under the laws of the Republic of
the Marshall Islands. Eletson Gas is a limited liability company
that specializes in liquified petroleum gas shipping.
Eletson and Levona were parties to a Third Amended and Restated LLC
Agreement, effective on August 16, 2019, that governs the
relationship among the holders of the membership interests in the
Company. Under the LLCA, Holdings was to own the common stock in
the Company while Levona was to hold the preferred shares. The LLCA
affords holders of Preferred Interests managerial control over the
Company.
The Company was plagued with financial problems, and by early 2022
five of the Company's ships -- over a third of its fleet -- had
been arrested by various creditors for non- payment of the
Company's liabilities. Multiple arrested ships were scheduled to be
sold at auction to compensate creditors, but before the auction,
Eletson and Levona entered into a Binding Offer Letter and related
agreements through which Levona provided much-needed cash in the
form of a loan to avoid the Company's loss of most of its fleet. As
part of those agreements, Levona granted the Company an option to
buy out Levona's Preferred Interests in the Company.
Several months later, Levona -- purporting to act on behalf of the
Company -- signed a non-binding Letter of Intent to sell nine of
the Company's 12 remaining vessels to its primary competitor,
Unigas. A dispute arose about whether Levona had the authority to
do this, which turned in large part on whether Eletson had in fact
exercised the option to buy the Preferred Interests.
Eletson made a demand for arbitration on July 29, 2022. It claimed
that Levona had breached the LLCA by purporting to act on behalf of
the Company and by “strip[ping]” the Company of its assets for
less than fair market value. Eletson argued that because it had
effectuated a buyout of the Preferred Interests, Levona had no
power to act on behalf of the Company.
A pivotal question in the arbitration was whether Eletson had
properly exercised the right granted it in the BOL to purchase
Levona's Preferred Interests in the Company.
The parties hotly disputed whether the Purchase Option had been
timely and properly exercised.
The arbitrator ultimately sided with Eletson.
Levona's motion is based on four documents that Eletson was
compelled to produce in a bankruptcy proceeding in which Holdings
is the debtor and Levona is a creditor. The documents were produced
on March 18, 2024 subject to a protective order, but Levona was
given leave to disclose the documents to this Court only on June
18, 2024. Levona's efforts to obtain these documents began during
the arbitration and continued uninterrupted thereafter. Its demands
were repeatedly rebuffed by Eletson.
Eletson opposes Levona's amendment principally on the grounds that
it is time-barred. According to Eletson, neither Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 15 nor equitable tolling are available to extend
the three-month time frame for motions to vacate arbitral awards
set forth in 9 U.S.C. sec. 12 or allow Levona to amend its motion
after the three-month period has expired.
Levona argues that the time-limit for filing the amended motion was
equitably tolled because it acted with diligence in pursuing its
claim of fraud and extraordinary circumstances prevented it from
filing earlier. Eletson resists that conclusion on the grounds that
(1) equitable tolling is not permissible under the FAA; and (2)
Levona has not established a basis for equitable tolling. Levona
has the better of the argument.
Eletson further argues that the conditions for equitable tolling
have not been satisfied. Levona argues that it diligently pursued
its rights and was unable to present the evidence of Eletson's
fraud to the Court only because Eletson concealed that fraud,
failed to produce relevant, responsive documents to Levona or the
arbitral tribunal, and then repeatedly imposed roadblocks to
Levona's ability to access the documents when they were produced in
the Bankruptcy Proceedings.
A statute of limitations is equitably tolled only when the party
seeking to avoid its effect shows that it has been pursuing its
rights diligently and some extraordinary circumstance stood in his
way to prevent timely filing.
Judge Liman says, "Levona has identified sufficient facts to
establish at this stage both an extraordinary circumstance and due
diligence." He explains, "Levona argues that Eletson committed
fraud during the arbitral proceeding when it withheld critical
evidence on the pivotal issue in that proceeding, that its
principal lied under oath about the facts to which that evidence
related, and that it then constructed extraordinary barriers to
prevent Levona from uncovering the evidence of that fraud until
after the limitations period for moving to vacate had expired."
"Eletson constructed extraordinary obstacles to prevent Levona from
uncovering its fraud. Levona time and again asked for the documents
that might show that Eletson had withheld material evidence from
the arbitrator. And Eletson time and again engaged in efforts to
frustrate Levona from obtaining that evidence."
Judge Liman adds, "Finally, Levona was reasonably diligent.
Diligence and extraordinary circumstances are related in that a
plaintiff's pursuit of their claims with reasonable diligence
establishes the causal link between the extraordinary circumstances
and the late filing."
Eletson argues that an amendment is not permissible because Levona
is guilty of undue delay and has acted in bad faith, that an
amendment would be futile, and that Eletson would be prejudiced by
an amendment. Were Rule 15 applicable, the Court would reject each
of these arguments.
The Court's conclusions with respect to diligence and the
materiality of the documents dispose of Eletson's arguments
regarding delay and bad faith. Absent a showing of bad faith or
undue prejudice, mere delay is insufficient for a court to deny the
right to amend, the Court states.
The motion also is not futile, the Court finds. Levona has
presented evidence that, if credited, would show that Eletson
engaged in fraudulent activity that Levona could not have
discovered and that went to a pivotal issue in the arbitration, the
Court concludes.
Levona also asks for discovery on its new claims. The Court will
permit discovery on facts relevant to equitable tolling and to
whether the award was procured by fraud or undue means.
A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=3Ojtyb
About Eletson Holdings
Eletson Holdings Inc. is a family-owned international shipping
company, which touts itself as having a global presence with
headquarters in Piraeus, Greece as well as offices in Stamford,
Connecticut, and London.
At one time, Eletson claimed to own and operate one of the world's
largest fleets of medium and long-range product tankers and boasted
a fleet consisting of 17 double hull tankers with a combined
capacity of 1,366,497 dwt, 5 LPG/NH3 carriers with a combined
capacity of 174,730 cbm and 9 LEG carriers with capacity of 108,000
cbm.
Eletson Holdings, a Liberian company, is Eletson's ultimate parent
company and is the direct parent and owner of 100% of the equity
interests in the two other debtors, Eletson Finance (US) LLC, and
Agathonissos Finance LLC.
Eletson and its two affiliates were subject to involuntary Chapter
7 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 23-10322) filed on
March 7, 2023 by creditors Pach Shemen LLC, VR Global Partners,
L.P. and Alpine Partners (BVI), L.P. The petitioning creditors are
represented by Kyle J. Ortiz, Esq., at Togut, Segal & Segal, LLP.
On Sept. 25, 2023, the Chapter 7 cases were converted to Chapter 11
cases.
The Honorable John P. Mastando, III is the case judge.
Derek J. Baker, Esq., represents the Debtors as bankruptcy
counsel.
On Oct. 20, 2023, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors in these Chapter 11
cases. The committee tapped Dechert, LLP as its legal counsel.
EVOKE PHARMA: Nantahala Capital, 2 Others Hold 10% Equity Stake
---------------------------------------------------------------
Nantahala Capital Management, LLC and its principals and managing
members, Wilmot B. Harkey and Daniel Mack, disclosed in Schedule
13D Report that as of September 20, 2024, they beneficially owned
84,686 shares of Evoke Pharma, Inc.'s common stock, representing
10% of the shares, based upon 819,272 shares of Common Stock
reported outstanding as of August 28, 2024, as reported in Evoke
Pharma's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on
August 29, 2024.
On or prior to March 27, 2024, the Reporting Persons caused the
Nantahala Investors to acquire 56,249 shares of Common Stock and
warrants now representing the right to purchase a further 1,414,334
shares of Common Stock. Such warrants, other than certain
Pre-Funded Common Stock Purchase Warrants, were amended on March
25, 2024. The Warrants are subject to a contractual prohibition on
any exercise if the Reporting Persons or certain related persons
would thereupon beneficially own more than 9.99% of the number of
shares of Common Stock outstanding. The Reporting Persons caused
the Nantahala Investors to make the investments in those shares of
Common Stock and Warrants for ordinary investment purposes.
Based on considerations regarding Evoke Pharma's capitalization
needs, the Report Persons intend to cause the Nantahala Investors
to exercise certain of the Warrants to the fullest extent permitted
by the Beneficial Ownership Limitation, at a per-share price of
$8.16 per share of Common Stock. The Reporting Persons anticipate
paying exercise consideration of approximately $232,045 to the
Evoke Pharma in connection with the exercise of the Warrants to
acquire approximately 28,437 shares, giving effect to the
Beneficial Ownership Limitation and based upon 819,272 shares of
Common Stock reported outstanding as of August 28, 2024, as
reported in the Evoke Pharma's Registration Statement on Form S-3
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 29,
2024. If the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding
increases, whether through issuances upon the exercise by other
persons of warrants substantially similar to the Warrants or
otherwise, then the Reporting Persons may exercise the Warrants for
additional shares, subject to the Beneficial Ownership Limitation.
The Reporting Persons further expect to cause the Nantahala
Investors to notify the Evoke Pharma that they elect to increase
the Beneficial Ownership Limitation to 19.99% of the number of
shares of Common Stock outstanding, which increase will not be
effective until the 61st day after such notice is delivered to the
Evoke Pharma.
The Reporting Persons also expect to engage in discussions with
Evoke Pharma regarding investments of additional capital in
transactions with Evoke Pharma, whether by acquiring shares of
Common Stock or otherwise. In connection with such discussions, the
Reporting Persons may request certain information monitoring and
corporate governance rights, including the right to nominate one or
more persons for appointment or election to Evoke Pharma's board of
directors.
Nantahala, as the investment adviser of the Nantahala Investors,
may be deemed to beneficially own 84,686 shares of Common Stock,
which includes the 56,249 shares of Common Stock held by the
Nantahala Investors and a further 28,437 shares of Common Stock
issuable upon exercise of the Warrants after giving effect to the
Beneficial Ownership Limitation, or approximately (but less than)
10% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. Each of Mr. Harkey
and Mr. Mack, as principals of Nantahala, may also be deemed to
beneficially own the same shares of Common Stock.
A full-text copy of Nantahala Capital's SEC Report is available
at:
https://tinyurl.com/3mebzrj4
About Evoke Pharma
Headquartered in Solana Beach, California, Evoke Pharma, Inc. --
http://www.evokepharma.com-- is a specialty pharmaceutical company
focused primarily on the development of drugs to treat GI disorders
and diseases. The company developed, commercialized, and markets
GIMOTI, a nasal spray formulation of metoclopramide, for the relief
of symptoms associated with acute and recurrent diabetic
gastroparesis in adults.
San Diego, California-based BDO USA, P.C., the Company's auditor
since 2014, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated March 14, 2024, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations since
inception. These factors raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
Evoke Pharma reported a net loss of $7.79 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2023, compared to a net loss of $8.22 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2022. As of June 30, 2024, the Company had
$12,136,215 in total assets, $9,471,257 in total liabilities, and
$2,664,958 in total stockholders' equity.
EYENOVIA INC: Falls Short of Nasdaq's Bid Price Requirement
-----------------------------------------------------------
Eyenovia, Inc. disclosed in a Form 8-K Report filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission that the Company received a
letter from the staff of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC providing
notification that, for the 30 consecutive business days prior to
September 18, 2024, the bid price for the Company's common stock
had closed below the minimum $1.00 per share requirement for
continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market under Nasdaq Listing
Rule 5550(a)(2).
Nasdaq's notice has no immediate effect on the listing of the
Company's common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market, which
continues to trade under the symbol "EYEN".
In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), the Company
has been provided an initial period of 180 calendar days, or until
March 17, 2025, to regain compliance with this requirement. To
regain compliance, the closing bid price of the Company's common
stock must be $1.00 per share or more for a minimum of 10
consecutive business days at any time before March 17, 2025. If the
Company does not regain compliance with Rule 5550(a)(2) by March
17, 2025, the Company may be eligible for an additional 180
calendar day compliance period. To qualify, the Company will be
required to meet the continued listing requirement for market value
of publicly held shares and all other Nasdaq initial listing
standards, except the bid price requirement, and would need to
provide written notice to Nasdaq of its intention to cure the
deficiency during the second compliance period. If it appears to
the Staff that the Company will not be able to cure the deficiency,
or if the Company is otherwise not eligible, Nasdaq would notify
the Company that its securities will be subject to delisting. In
the event of such notification, the Company may appeal the Staff's
determination to delist its securities, but there can be no
assurance the Staff would grant the Company's request for continued
listing.
The Company intends to actively monitor the minimum bid price of
its common stock and may, as appropriate, consider available
options to regain compliance.
About Eyenovia
New York, N.Y.-based Eyenovia, Inc. is an ophthalmic technology
company commercializing Mydcombi (tropicamide and phenylephrine HCL
ophthalmic spray) for inducing mydriasis for routine diagnostic
procedures and in conditions where short term pupil dilation is
desired, preparing for the commercialization of clobetasol
propionate ophthalmic suspension 0.05% ("clobetasol propionate"),
for the treatment of post-operative inflammation and pain following
ocular surgery, and developing the Optejet delivery system both for
use in combination with its own drug-device therapeutic programs
and for out-licensing for use in combination with therapeutics for
additional indications. The Company's aim is to improve the
delivery of topical ophthalmic medication through the ergonomic
design of the Optejet which facilitates ease-of-use and delivery of
a more physiologically appropriate medication volume, with the goal
to reduce side effects and improve tolerability and introduce
digital health technology to improve therapy compliance and
ultimately medical outcomes.
New York, N.Y.-based Marcum LLP, the Company's auditor since 2017,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated March
18, 2024, citing that the Company has incurred significant losses
and needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and
sustain its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, Eyenovia incurred
net losses of approximately $27.3 million and $28 million,
respectively. As of June 30, 2024, Eyenovia had $19 million in
total assets, $21.4 million in total liabilities, and $2.4 million
in total stockholders' deficit.
FAIR OFFER CASH NOW: Hits Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection
----------------------------------------------------------
Fair Offer Cash Now Inc. filed Chapter 11 protection in the Middle
District of Tennessee. According to court documents, the Debtor
reports $4,783,400 in debt owed to 1 and 49 creditors. The petition
states funds will be available to unsecured creditors.
A meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. Section 341(a) is slated for
October 16, 2024 at 1:00 p.m. in Room Telephonically on telephone
conference line: 866-718-3566. participant access code: 8613356#.
About Fair Offer Cash Now Inc.
Fair Offer Cash Now Inc. owns 27 properties all located in Alabama,
Kentucky, Missouri, Tennessee, Georgia and Mississippi having a
total current value of $4.94 million.
Fair Offer Cash Now Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 24-03495) on September
11, 2024. In the petition filed by Bradley Smotherman, as
president, the Debtor reports total assets of $4,942,400 and total
liabilities of $4,783,400.
Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Charles M. Walker handles the case.
The Debtor is represented by:
Jay R. Lefkovitz, Esq.
LEFKOVITZ & LEFKOVITZ
908 Harpeth Valley Place
Nashville, TN 37221
Tel: 615-256-8300
Fax: 615-255-4516
Email: jlefkovitz@lefkovitz.com
FAIR OFFER: Hires Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz PLLC as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Fair Offer Cash Now, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Tennesse to employ Lefkovitz &
Lefkovitz, PLLC as its bankruptcy counsel.
The firm's services include:
a. advising the Debtor(s) as to her rights, duties, and powers
as Debtor(s)-in Possession;
b. preparing and filing statements and schedules, plans, and
other documents and pleadings necessary to be filed by the
Debtor(s) in this proceeding;
c. representing the Debtor(s) at all hearings, meetings of
creditors, conferences, trials; and
d. performing such other legal services as may be necessary in
connection with this case.
The firm has received a total of $20,000 as a retainer.
The firm will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates. The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.
Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz is a "disinterested person" as defined in
Bankruptcy Code Secs 101(14) and 327, according to court filings.
The firm can be reached through:
Jay R. Lefkovitz, Esq.
LEFKOVITZ & LEFKOVITZ, PLLC
908 Harpeth Valley Place
Nashville, TN 37221
Tel: (615) 256-8300
Fax: (615) 255-4516
Email: jlefkovitz@lefkovitz.com
About Fair Offer Cash Now, Inc.
The Debtor owns 27 properties all located in Alabama, Kentucky,
Missouri, Tennessee, Georgia and Mississippi having a total current
value of $4.94 million.
Fair Offer Cash Now, Inc. in Murfreesboro, TN, sought relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code filed its voluntary petition for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 24-03495) on
Sept. 11, 2024, listing $4,942,400 in assets and $4,783,400 in
liabilities. Bradley Smotherman as president, signed the petition.
Judge Charles M Walker oversees the case.
LEFKOVITZ & LEFKOVITZ serve as the Debtor's legal counsel.
FAIRFIELD SENTRY: UBS AG Must Face Adversary Case in SDNY
---------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned as FAIRFIELD SENTRY LTD. (In Liquidation), et
al., Plaintiffs v., ABN AMRO SCHWEIZ AG a/k/a AMRO (SWITZERLAND)
AG, et al., Defendants, Adv. Pro. No. 10-03636 (JPM) (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y.), the Honorable John P. Mastando III of the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York denied UBS
AG's motion to dismiss the Fifth Amended Complaint filed by the
Liquidators for lack of personal jurisdiction.
UBS AG is an Aktiengesellschaft "organized under Swiss company law,
with registered offices in Zurich and Basel, Switzerland." UBS AG
maintained branches in the United States, but its principal place
of business is in Switzerland. The Amended Complaint identifies UBS
AG New York and UBS AG Zurich as two
separate entities.
This adversary proceeding was filed on September 21, 2010. Kenneth
M. Krys and Greig Mitchell -- in their capacities as the duly
appointed Liquidators and Foreign Representatives of Fairfield
Sentry Limited (In Liquidation), Fairfield Sigma Limited (In
Liquidation), and Fairfield Lambda Limited (In Liquidation) --
filed the Amended Complaint on August 12, 2021. Via the Amended
Complaint, the Liquidators seek the imposition of a constructive
trust and recovery of over $1.7 billion in redemption payments made
by Sentry, Sigma, and Lambda to various entities known as the Citco
Subscribers. Of that amount, Defendant allegedly received over $4
million through redemption payments from its investment in Sentry.
This legal action arises out of the decades-long effort to recover
assets of the Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC Ponzi
scheme. The Citco Subscribers allegedly invested, either for their
own account or for the account of others, into several funds --
including Sentry, Sigma, and Lambda -- that channeled investments
into BLMIS.
Fairfield Sentry was a direct feeder fund in that it was
established for the purpose of bringing investors into BLMIS,
thereby allowing Madoff's scheme to continue.
The Amended Complaint alleges the Citco Subscribers, including the
purported agents of UBS AG, "had knowledge of the Madoff fraud, and
therefore knowledge that the Net Asset Value was inflated" when the
redemption payments were made. The Amended Complaint further
asserts that, while receiving redemption payments, the Citco
Subscribers "uncovered multiple additional indicia that Madoff was
engaged in some form of fraud" but "turned a blind eye, [and]
accept[ed] millions of dollars while willfully ignoring or, at the
very least, recklessly disregarding the truth in clear violation of
the law of the British Virgin Islands . . . ." These indicia
included verification that there was no "independent confirmation
that BLMIS-held assets even existed," Madoff's failure to segregate
duties, and BLMIS's "employing an implausibly small auditing firm"
rather than a reliable auditor. In the face of red flags such as
these, the Citco Subscribers and other Citco entities purportedly
"quietly reduced [their] own exposure to BLMIS through the Funds,
and significantly increase[ed] [their] Custodian fees to offset the
risk."
Defendant has moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint for lack of
personal jurisdiction, arguing that the Amended Complaint has not
sufficiently alleged minimum contacts with the forum to establish
personal jurisdiction over Defendant and that exercising personal
jurisdiction would be unreasonable.
The Liquidators assert that UBS AG "intentionally invested in BLMIS
feeder fund Sentry, while knowing through its agent, that Sentry
was designed to subsequently invest that money in New York-based
BLMIS. UBS is subject to the Court's jurisdiction with respect to
its Sentry redemptions as a result of that conduct."
UBS AG states that, while the subscription agreements contain forum
selection clauses specifying New York for claims relating to
subscriptions, there is no similar clause subjecting any party to
jurisdiction in New York for claims relating to redemptions. The
Defendant argues that the "absence of such clauses relating to
redemptions shows the parties intent not to subject themselves to
jurisdiction in New York for purposes other than subscriptions."
Judge Mastando says, "The Liquidators here rely on the subscription
agreements and private placement memoranda not to show consent, but
to show that when Defendant invested in Sentry it did so knowing
that it would avail itself of the benefits and protections of New
York. The absence of any similar clauses in redemption documents
does not invalidate the import of the forum selection clauses for
these purposes. The subscription agreements, signed by the Citco
Subscriber as an agent of UBS AG, in this way, support the
Plaintiffs' showing of contacts with the forum."
The Liquidators have demonstrated facts supporting continuous and
systemic contacts with the forum, the Court finds.
Defendant argues that the Plaintiffs' allegations amount to "mere
knowledge that Sentry would invest money it raised in the BVI with
BLMIS in New York," which it states is "insufficient as a matter of
law to support jurisdiction" under Walden v. Fiore, 571 U.S. 277
(2014).
The Court points out the Plaintiffs' allegations and supporting
evidence of intentional investments into BLMIS in New York and
selection and use of U.S.-based correspondent accounts demonstrate
that UBS AG took affirmative actions on its own apart from the
conduct of the Plaintiffs. The Liquidators have shown that the
Defendant knew and intended that, by investing in the Funds,
Defendant's money would enter into U.S.-based BLMIS, the Court
states.
Judge Mastando concludes, "The Court finds that Defendant's
selection and use of U.S. correspondent accounts and due diligence
concerning investments with BLMIS in New York support the Court's
exercise of jurisdiction over the claims for receiving redemption
payments from the Fairfield Funds with the knowledge that the NAV
was wrong. The contacts are not random, isolated, or fortuitous.
The contacts demonstrate UBS AG's purposeful activities aimed at
New York in order to effectuate transfers from Sentry. The
Plaintiffs have thus provided allegations that sufficiently support
a prima facie showing of jurisdiction over the Defendant."
A copy of the Court's decision dated August 30, 2024, is available
at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=JpSvFA
About Fairfield Sentry
Fairfield Sentry Limited is being liquidated under the supervision
of the Commercial Division of the High Court of Justice in the
British Virgin Islands. It is one of the funds owned by the
Fairfield Greenwich Group, an investment firm founded in 1983 in
New York. Fairfield Sentry and other Greenwich funds had among the
largest exposures to the Bernard L. Madoff fraud.
Fairfield Sentry became the subject of a BVI liquidation, and a BVI
court appointed Kenneth M. Krys and Greig Mitchell as Liquidators
and Foreign Representatives of Fairfield Sentry and Fairfield Sigma
under BVI law. The Liquidators then sought recognition of the BVI
liquidation as a foreign main proceeding by filing petitions under
Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
10-13164) on June 14, 2010 in the Southern District of New York.
The Bankruptcy Court entered an order granting recognition of the
Fairfield Sentry case on July 22, 2010, enabling the Liquidators to
use the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to protect and administer Fairfield
Sentry's assets in the U.S.
FARELL'S ON ROUND TOP: Seeks Bankruptcy Protection in New York
--------------------------------------------------------------
Farrell's on Round Top LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in the
Southern District of New York. According to court documents, the
Debtor reports between $1 million and $10 million in debt owed to 1
and 49 creditors. The petition states that funds will be available
to unsecured creditors.
A meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. Section 341(a) is slated for
Oct. 9, 2024 at 12:30 p.m. at Office of UST (TELECONFERENCE ONLY).
About Farrell's on Round Top
Farrell's on Round Top LLC owns a mixed use commercial property
(105 acres, hotel, bar/restauarnt (dormant) located at Mountain
Avenue, Purling NY 12470 having a current value $3 million.
Farrell's on Round Top LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 24-35906) on
September 9, 2024. In the petition filed by Garrett P. Doyle, as
managing member, the Debtor reports estimated assets and
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million each.
The Debtor is represented by:
Richard S. Feinsilver, Esq.
RICHARD S. FEINSILVER, ESQ.
One Old Country Road, Suite 347
Carle Place, NY 11514
Tel: 516-873-6330
E-mail: feinlawny@yahoo.com
FIRST QUALITY: TD Bank Seeks to Enforce Cash Collateral Order
-------------------------------------------------------------
TD Bank, N.A., a secured creditor, filed a motion with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, seeking
enforcement of the court's final order authorizing use of its cash
collateral by First Quality Laboratory Inc.
The final cash collateral order issued by the court on June 17
mandated that First Quality implement certain measures to safeguard
TD Bank's interests. Among these measures was a requirement for the
company to make monthly payments of $2,000 to TD Bank. However, TD
Bank has not received the payment that was due on September 1.
TD Bank's counsel contacted the company's counsel to discuss the
delay in payment but did not receive any response to their
inquiries. Consequently, TD Bank felt compelled to file the motion
to enforce the company's obligations under the final cash
collateral order.
TD Bank specifically requests that the court compel the company to
immediately make the overdue adequate protection payment for
September 1. Additionally, the bank seeks any other relief the
court may consider just and appropriate under the circumstances.
About First Quality Laboratory
First Quality Laboratory, Inc., owns and operates a medical
laboratory in Hollywood, Fla.
First Quality Laboratory filed a petition under Chapter 11,
Subchapter V of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
23-19831) on Nov. 29, 2023, with $1 million to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities. Luz F. Garcia, vice president, signed the
petition.
Judge Peter D. Russin oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by Gary M. Murphree, Esq., at Am Law,
LLC.
FTX TRADING: Reaches Securities Deal With Five State Agencies
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Zigterman of Law360 Bankruptcy Authority reports that defunct
cryptocurrency exchange FTX has reached a settlement with agencies
in five states that had asserted about $1.8 billion in claims
against the debtor.
About FTX Trading Ltd.
FTX is the world's second-largest cryptocurrency firm. FTX is a
cryptocurrency exchange built by traders, for traders. FTX offers
innovative products including industry-first derivatives, options,
volatility products and leveraged tokens.
Then CEO and co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried said Nov. 10, 2022, that
FTX paused customer withdrawals after it was hit with roughly $5
billion worth of withdrawal requests.
Faced with liquidity issues, FTX on Nov. 9 struck a deal to sell
itself to its giant rival Binance, but Binance walked away from the
deal amid reports on FTX regarding mishandled customer funds and
alleged US agency investigations.
At 4:30 a.m. on Nov. 11, Bankman-Fried ultimately agreed to step
aside, and restructuring vet John J. Ray III was quickly named new
CEO.
FTX Trading Ltd (d/b/a FTX.com), West Realm Shires Services Inc.
(d/b/a FTX US), Alameda Research Ltd. and certain affiliated
companies then commenced Chapter 11 proceedings (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 22-11068) on an emergency basis on Nov. 11, 2022.
Additional entities sought Chapter 11 protection on Nov. 14, 2022.
FTX Trading and its affiliates each listed $10 billion to $50
million in assets and liabilities, making FTX the biggest
bankruptcy filer in the US this year. According to Reuters, SBF
shared a document with investors on Nov. 10 showing FTX had $13.86
billion in liabilities and $14.6 billion in assets. However, only
$900 million of those assets were liquid, leading to the cash
crunch that ended with the company filing for bankruptcy.
The Hon. John T. Dorsey is the case judge.
The Debtors tapped Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP as bankruptcy counsel;
Landis Rath & Cobb, LLP as local counsel; and Alvarez & Marsal
North America, LLC as financial advisor. Kroll is the claims
agent, maintaining the page
https://cases.ra.kroll.com/FTX/Home-Index
The official committee of unsecured creditors tapped Paul Hastings
as bankruptcy counsel; Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as
Delaware and conflicts counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc. as financial
advisor; and Jefferies, LLC as investment banker.
Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP, led by partners Gregory
T. Donilon, Edward L. Schnitzer, and David M. Banker, is
representing Sam Bankman-Fried in the Chapter 11 cases.
White-collar crime specialist Mark S. Cohen has reportedly been
hired to represent SBF in litigation. Lawyers at Paul Weiss
previously represented SBF but later renounced representing the
entrepreneur due to a conflict of interest.
GFL SOLID: Moody's Rates New $210MM 2024A Revenue Bonds 'B3'
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings has assigned a B3 backed senior unsecured rating to
GFL Solid Waste Southeast LLC's funding obligation and proposed
$210 million Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds Series 2024A issued
by the Florida Development Finance Corporation which is fully
guaranteed by GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL). At the same time
Moody's affirmed GFL's B1 corporate family rating, B1-PD
probability of default rating and B3 senior unsecured notes issued
by GFL and Wrangler Holdco Corp., a 100% owned US domiciled
subsidiary of GFL. GFL's senior secured notes and bank credit
facility ratings were upgraded to Ba2 from Ba3. The Speculative
Grade Liquidity Rating also changed to SGL-3 (adequate) from SGL-2
(good). The outlook has remained positive for GFL and Wrangler
Holdco Corp., and was assigned positive for GFL Solid Waste
Southeast LLC.
The revenue bond will be issued by Florida Development Finance
Corporation and the proceeds from the issuance will be loaned to
GFL Solid Waste Southeast LLC, an indirect subsidiary of GFL, to
primarily finance the costs of acquiring, constructing, and
equipping of certain solid waste disposal facilities located
throughout the State of Florida. These revenue bonds are
obligations of GFL and guaranteed by GFL and certain of its
operating subsidiaries on a senior unsecured basis, as required by
the terms of a loan agreement between the Florida Development
Finance Corporation and GFL Solid Waste Southeast LLC.
The upgrade of the senior secured debt instruments (term loan and
senior secured notes) to Ba2 from Ba3, two notches above the CFR,
reflects the increased proportion of unsecured debt in the
liability waterfall, which increases the loss absorption capacity
provided by the senior unsecured debt.
RATINGS RATIONALE
GFL's B1 CFR is constrained by: 1) its history of aggressive debt
financed acquisition growth which has led to financial leverage
(adjusted debt/EBITDA) remaining between 5x and 5.5x since its IPO
in March 2020; 2) the short time frame between acquisitions which
increases the potential for integration risks; and 3) GFL's
majority ownership by private equity firms, which may hinder
deleveraging.
The rating benefits from: 1) the company's growing and diversified
business model; 2) high recurring revenue supported by long term
contracts; 3) its good market position in the stable Canadian and
US nonhazardous waste industry; and 4) growing EBITDA margins that
benefits from acquisition cost synergies and its vertically
integrated business model.
The change of GFL's SGL to adequate (SGL-3) from good (SGL-2)
reflects the $750 million debt maturity due in August 2025. The
sources total around C$1.1 billion compared to around C$1 billion
of mandatory debt payments over the next 12 months. As of June 30,
2024, GFL had cash of around C$134 million, around C$640 million
(post revenue bond issuance) available under its C$1.3 billion
revolving credit facilities (expiring September 2026) and Moody's
expectation of around C$300 million of free cash flow through
September 2025. GFL's revolver is subject to a net leverage and an
interest coverage covenant, which Moody's expect will have
sufficient buffer over the next four quarters. While the revolver,
term loan B and secured notes are secured by all assets of GFL, the
company can still sell assets for additional liquidity.
The positive outlook reflects Moody's expectation that GFL will
operate within their stated capital allocation policy and lower
financial leverage such that adjusted debt/EBITDA will trend
towards 4.5x over the next year. The positive outlook also
incorporates Moody's expectation of favorable pricing that will
temper volume pressures and growing free cash flow over the next 12
to 18 months.
FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS
The ratings could be upgraded if GFL continues to deliver solid
operating performance and demonstrates a commitment to maintain a
more conservative and predictable financial policy, such that
adjusted Debt/EBITDA is sustained below 4.5x and FFO plus interest
expense /interest expense increases to around 4x. Moody's would
also expect GFL to maintain a strong free cash flow position and a
good liquidity profile.
The ratings could be downgraded if liquidity weakens, possibly
caused by negative free cash flow, if there is a material and
sustained decline in operating margin due to challenges integrating
acquisitions or if adjusted debt/EBITDA is sustained above 5.5x.
The principal methodology used in these ratings was Environmental
Services and Waste Management published in August 2024.
GFL Environmental Inc., headquartered in Toronto, provides solid
waste and liquid waste collection, treatment and disposal solutions
and soil remediation services to municipal, industrial and
commercial customers in Canada and the US.
GLEMAUD MANAGEMENT: U.S. Bank Seeks to Prohibit Access to Cash
--------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for BNC Mortgage Loan
Trust 2007-1, asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York to prohibit Glemaud Management Company, LLC
from using its cash collateral.
The bank's cash collateral consists of rental income derived from
the company's real property at 1233 Boynton Avenue, Bronx, N.Y.
Jenelle Arnold, Esq., attorney for U.S. Bank, criticized the use of
cash collateral by the company without approval from U.S. Bank or
the bankruptcy court, and without "adequate protection" payments
from the company.
"Creditor is being harmed by [Glemaud's] use of cash collateral as
the subject loan remains in default while creditor maintains the
property," the attorney said in court papers.
To safeguard its interests, U.S. Bank asked for adequate protection
payments equal to the current monthly payment of $5,725.39, and a
post-petition replacement lien.
About Glemaud Management
Glemaud Management Company, LLC is primarily engaged in renting and
leasing real estate properties. The Debtor owns four properties in
Bronx, N.Y., with a total current value of $2.96 million based on
its estimate.
Glemaud filed Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
24-10417) on March 31, 2024, with $3,023,960 in assets and
$3,243,044 in liabilities. The petition was signed by Judemyr
Glemaud as managing member.
Judge Martin Glenn presides over the case.
H Bruce Bronson, Esq., at Bronson Law Offices, PC represents the
Debtor as counsel.
GLENSIDE PIZZA: Hires Konstantinos Tzitzifas CPA as Accountant
--------------------------------------------------------------
Glenside Pizza, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Pennsylvania to employ Konstantinos Tzitzifas,
CPA as accountant.
Mr. Tzitzifas will assist the Debtor in preparing monthly operating
reports, income tax returns, and any other accounting needs that
might arise.
Mr. Tzitzifas will be paid at the rate of $195 per hour, and will
also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred.
As disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.
About Glenside Pizza, Inc.
Glenside Pizza, Inc. owns and operates a pizza restaurant in
Glenside, Pa.
Glenside Pizza filed a petition under Chapter 11, Subchapter V of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 24-13096) on
September 3, 2024, listing $121,500 in assets and $1,512,137 in
liabilities. The petition was signed by Vasilios Zonios as owner
and president.
Judge Ashely M Chan presides over the case.
Ellen M. McDowell, Esq., at McDowell Law, PC represents the Debtor
as bankruptcy counsel.
HAZEL TECHNOLOGIES: Unsecureds Will Get 0% to 100% of Claims
------------------------------------------------------------
Hazel Technologies, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware a Small Business Plan of Reorganization
under Subchapter V dated August 22, 2024.
Hazel is focused on developing solutions to reduce waste across all
stages of the produce transit process. Hazel sells products that
extend the shelf life of fresh fruits, vegetables, and flowers (the
fruits, vegetables, and flowers treated by the respective product
lines, the "Subject Commodities").
The additional shelf life that Hazel's products provide permits the
growers, packers, shippers, and retailers of the Subject
Commodities to improve their quality and operating margins. Prior
to the Petition Date, Hazel primarily sold two product lines: Hazel
100(TM) ("Hazel 100") and Hazel Breatheway(R) ("Breatheway").
During the prepetition period, Hazel undertook several steps to
further its Breatheway goforward strategy, including reducing the
number of employees from 53 to 27, vacating its Chicago
headquarters, and moving its essential operations to its Fresno,
California, office, and securing postpetition debtor-in-possession
financing. Hazel then elected to file a voluntary petition under
subchapter V of chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code to implement the
automatic stay and provide the Debtor with the necessary breathing
room to successfully complete its restructuring.
The Debtor has taken several steps in the Chapter 11 Case to
implement the restructuring transactions proposed under this Plan.
Upon commencing the Chapter 11 Case, the Debtor sought a number of
orders from the Bankruptcy Court to ensure a smooth transition of
its operations into Chapter 11 and facilitate the administration of
the Chapter 11 Case.
Under the Plan, Hazel Technologies will devote all of its
Disposable Income toward the payment of Creditors over a period up
to five years, in accordance with section 1191 of the Bankruptcy
Code. The Plan provides for full payment of Administrative
Expenses, Priority Tax Claims, and Priority Unsecured Claims, and
projects, but does not guarantee, full payment to General Unsecured
Claims in Distributions over time.
The Plan will be funded by: (i) Cash on hand on the Effective Date;
(ii) the DIP Lenders' conversion of the entire DIP Credit Facility
plus accrued interest into newly authorized class of Series AA
Preferred Participating Stock ("New Preferred Shares") in the
Reorganized Debtor; (iii) the issuance (the "New Preferred Shares
Infusion") of up to an additional $7,000,000.00, but no less than
$5,000,000.00 of New Preferred Shares in the Reorganized Debtor to
be purchased by the DIP Lenders at the "Original Purchase Price,"
which Original Purchase Price will be based upon a fully diluted
pre-money valuation of $1,000,000.00, including an unissued and
unallocated employee stock incentive plan pool representing 7.5% of
the fully-diluted post-money capitalization; and (iv) the
Disposable Income generated by the Reorganized Debtor over the
proposed Payment Period.
Holders of common Equity Interests in the Debtor as of the Record
Date, including the DIP Lenders, will retain their common stock
(after accounting for a reverse split at 1:100) in the Reorganized
Debtor. Holders of preferred Equity Interests in the Debtor as of
the Record Date will have their preferred Equity Interests
converted into newly issued common stock of the Reorganized Debtor,
in the ratios set forth in the Debtor's certificate of
incorporation, which shares then will be reverse split at 1:100.
Holders of common or preferred Equity Interests in the Debtor as of
the Record Date, excluding the DIP Lenders (the "Existing
Investors"), may participate in the New Preferred Shares Infusion
for up to $2,000,000.00 in New Preferred Shares on a pro rata basis
at the Original Purchase Price. If the Reorganized Debtor has not
raised $2,000,000.00 from the Existing Investors, the Reorganized
Debtor may, but shall not be required to, sell the unsubscribed
portion of such New Preferred Shares to new investors mutually
acceptable to the Reorganized Debtor and the DIP Lenders within 120
days of the Effective Date.
Class 3 consists of General Unsecured Claims. Paid in Disposable
Income as defined in section 1191(d) of the Bankruptcy Code in
yearly distributions on the Distribution Date over the Payment
Period, provided, however that in the event the Reorganized Debtor
is liquidated or dissolved prior to the conclusion of the Payment
Period, the Reorganized Debtor shall pay the balance owed to the
Holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims prior to making any
Distributions to the Holders of Equity Interests in the Reorganized
Debtor. The Debtor may elect in its sole discretion to pay the
balance owed to Allowed Unsecured Claims without penalty or premium
prior to the conclusion of the Payment Period.
The Debtor projects that the Holders of General Unsecured Claims
will be paid in full over the Payment Period, but that result is
not guaranteed, therefore, the range of recovery for Holders of
General Unsecured Claims ranges from 0% to 100%. The allowed
unsecured claims total $5,600,000.00. This Class is impaired.
Class 4 consists of Equity Interest Holders. On the Effective Date
the Holders of existing common Equity Interests will retain their
common stock in the Reorganized Debtor; provided, however, that
such common stock will be reverse split at a 1:100 ratio. Holders
of existing preferred Equity Interests will have their preferred
Equity Interests converted, in the ratios set forth in the Debtor's
certificate of incorporation, into newly-issued common stock of the
Reorganized Debtor (which shares of common stock in the Reorganized
Debtor will be reverse split at a 1:100 ratio).
In addition, on the Effective Date, and following the conversion of
the DIP Credit Facility to the New Preferred Shares and the DIP
Lenders purchase of $5,000,000.00 of the New Preferred Shares at
the Original Purchase Price, Existing Investors shall be entitled
to purchase, on a pro rata basis, up to $2,000,000.00 of the New
Preferred Shares at the Original Purchase Price. Equity Interests
will be subject to the organizational documents and any Shareholder
Agreements of the Reorganized Debtor, which will be filed as part
of the Plan Supplement.
The Plan will be funded by Cash on hand on the Effective Date and
the projected Disposable Income earned from the operations of the
Reorganized Debtor following the New Preferred Shares Infusion. For
the avoidance of doubt, the New Preferred Shares Infusion is not a
source of consideration for distributions to be made pursuant to
this Plan either as Cash on hand or Disposable Income.
A full-text copy of the Plan of Reorganization dated August 22,
2024 is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=vmQO6q from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.
Counsel to the Debtor:
Michael W. Yurkewicz, Esq.
Domenic E. Pacitti, Esq.
Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP
919 North Market Street, Suite 1000
Wilmington, DE 19801
Tel: (302) 426-1189
Fax: (302) 426-9193
Email: myurkewicz@klehr.com
Email: dpacitti@klehr.com
-and-
Morton R. Branzburg, Esq.
1835 Market Street, Suite 1400
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
Telephone: (215) 569-3007
Facsimile: (215) 568-6603
Email: mbranzburg@klehr.com
Catherine Steege, Esq.
Jenner & Block LLP
353 N. Clark Street
Chicago, IL 60654
Tel: (312) 222-9350
About Hazel Technologies
Hazel Technologies, Inc., is in the business of agriculture
technology product development.
The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 24-11142) on June 3, 2024,
with $1 million to $10 million in assets and liabilities. Parker R.
Booth, chief executive officer, signed the petition.
Judge J. Kate Stickles presides over the case.
The Debtor tapped Mark W. Yurkewicz, Esq., at KLEHR HARRISON HARVEY
BRANZBURG LLP as counsel; Stretto as claims and noticing agent; and
Rock Creek Advisors, LLC as consultant.
HNO INTERNATIONAL: Posts $496,621 Net Loss in Fiscal Q3
-------------------------------------------------------
HNO International, Inc. filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $496,621 on $4,241 of revenues for the three months ended July
31, 2024, compared to a net loss of $459,806 with no revenues for
the three months ended July 31, 2023.
For the nine months ended July 31, 2024, the Company reported a net
loss of $1,584,438 on $4,241 of revenues, compared to a net loss of
$962,028 on $13,000 of revenues for the same period in 2023.
On July 31, 2024, the Company had an accumulated deficit of
$43,194,383. HNO said, "We have not been able to generate
sufficient cash from operating activities to fund our ongoing
operations. We will be required to raise additional funds through
public or private financing, additional collaborative
relationships, or other arrangements until we are able to raise
revenues to a point of positive cash flow. We are evaluating
various options to further reduce our cash requirements to operate
at a reduced rate, as well as options to raise additional funds,
including obtaining loans and selling common stock. There is no
guarantee that we will be able to generate enough revenue and/or
raise capital to support operations."
As of July 31, 2024, the Company had $1,414,495 in total assets,
$2,399,206 in total liabilities, and $984,711 in total
stockholders' deficit.
A full-text copy of the Company's Form 10-Q is available at:
https://tinyurl.com/t5466ape
About HNO International
Headquartered in Murrieta, California, HNO International, Inc., a
Nevada corporation, focuses on systems engineering design,
integration, and product development to generate green
hydrogen-based clean energy solutions to help businesses and
communities decarbonize in the near term.
Lakewood, CO-based BF Borgers CPA PC, the Company's former auditor,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated Jan. 29,
2024, citing that the Company has suffered recurring losses from
operations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.
On May 7, 2024, it dismissed BF Borgers CPA, PC as its independent
accountant to audit the Company's financial statements, after the
firm and its owner, Benjamin F. Borgers, were charged by the
Securities and Exchange Commission with deliberate and systemic
failures to comply with Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(PCAOB) standards in its audits and reviews incorporated in more
than 1,500 SEC filings from January 2021 through June 2023; falsely
representing to their clients that the firm's work would comply
with PCAOB standards; fabricating audit documentation to make it
appear that the firm's work did comply with PCAOB standards; and
falsely stating in audit reports included in more than 500 public
company SEC filings that the firm's audits complied with PCAOB
standards. Borgers agreed to pay a $14 million civil penalty and
agreed to permanent suspensions from appearing and practicing
before the Commission as accountants, effective immediately.
On the same date, the Company's Board of Directors approved the
engagement of Barton CPA, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as the Company's new independent accountant to
audit the Company's financial statements and to perform reviews of
interim financial statements.
HO WAN KWOK: Owns Daughter's Boyfriend's Motorcycles, Court Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Julie A. Manning of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Connecticut granted the motion for judgment on the
pleadings filed by Luc A. Despins, in his capacity as the Chapter
11 trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Ho Wan Kwok, against the
defendant, Defeng Cao.
Mr. Cao is deeply intertwined with the Individual Debtor's affairs,
both personally and through his purported employment.
Mr. Cao is the boyfriend of the Individual Debtor's daughter, Mei
Guo. He has lived with the Individual Debtor and his family. Mr.
Cao vacations with the Individual Debtor's family. According to an
affidavit Mr. Cao submitted in September 2017 in the New York
Supreme Court, Mr. Cao was at that time employed by the Individual
Debtor.
The motion seeks judgment on the pleadings with respect to the
first and second claims of the complaint which includes a total of
five claims.
The First Claim alleges the Individual Debtor is the beneficial
owner of four motorcycles legally owned by Mr. Cao. On this basis,
the First Claim seeks, pursuant to sections 541, 542, and 544 of
the Bankruptcy Code, declaratory judgment that the Motorcycles are
property of the Estate and an order requiring the Motorcycles be
turned over to the Estate via delivery to the Trustee. The Second
Claim, pled in the alternative to the First Claim, alleges the
transfer of the Motorcycles from the Individual Debtor to Mr. Cao
was an unauthorized post-petition transfer. On this basis, pursuant
to sections 549 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Second Claim
seeks an order avoiding the transfer of the Motorcycles and
requiring the surrender of the Motorcycles or their value to the
Trustee.
The Trustee argues Mr. Cao admits or does not deny several
allegations against him. Where Mr. Cao instead denies allegations,
the Trustee argues those denials should be disregarded by the Court
because they are controverted by more specific allegations,
documentary evidence, and his own sworn testimony. The Trustee
contends Mr. Cao has effectively admitted he did not purchase, use,
possess, insure, or control the Motorcycles. Moreover, the Trustee
asserts, Mr. Cao has admitted that persons involved with the
Individual Debtor effected the transfer of the Motorcycles to Mr.
Cao and the Individual Debtor is the only person who resided at the
Taconic and Mahwah Mansions and has used the Motorcycles.
Mr. Cao argues the Trustee has failed to establish the Individual
Debtor's ownership of the Motorcycles, instead focusing on Mr.
Cao's alleged lack of true ownership.
The Court agrees with the Trustee. Taken together, the allegations
Mr. Cao admits, fails to deny, and that are supported by his
testimony despite his denial support the conclusion that Mr. Cao is
merely the nominal owner of the Motorcycles and the Individual
Debtor beneficially owns and controls the Motorcycles, the Court
concludes.
Therefore, upon the undisputed allegations, the Court determines
the Trustee is entitled to judgment as a matter of law that the
Individual Debtor is the beneficial owner of the Motorcycles and,
hence, the Motorcycles are property of the Estate that must be
delivered to the Trustee.
The Trustee argues that the same undisputed allegations that
establish the Individual Debtor's beneficial ownership of the
Motorcycles demonstrate that the Individual Debtor beneficially
owned the Motorcycles through the October 2022 transfer of title to
Mr. Cao. Therefore, the Trustee asserts, even assuming -- contrary
to the allegations of the First Claim -- the October 2022 transfer
was more than nominal, he can avoid the October 2022 transfer
because it occurred post-petition and was not authorized by the
Court. In response, Mr. Cao argues the Trustee has failed to
establish that the Individual Debtor was the owner of the
Motorcycles prior to the transfer in October 2022.
The Court agrees with the Trustee. Judge Manning says, "First, the
undisputed allegations establish that the Motorcycles were in the
possession of the Individual Debtor's family prior to the October
2022 transfer, but that Mr. Cao has no claim to legal or beneficial
ownership of the Motorcycles prior to the October 2022 transfer.
Second, unclouded by any competing claim of ownership prior to the
October 2022 transfer, the undisputed allegations establish that,
for the reasons set forth in the discussion of the First Claim, the
Individual Debtor beneficially owned the Motorcycles prior to
October 2022. Third, it is undisputed that the October 2022
transfer occurred after the Individual Debtor's voluntary Chapter
11 petition. Fourth and finally, the Court may take judicial
notice of the record of these jointly administered Chapter 11 cases
and related adversary proceedings to establish the fact that this
Court has not authorized the transfer of the Motorcycles."
Mr. Cao's asserted defenses do not preclude judgment on the
pleadings.
The Court issued an Order as follows:
-- Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Secs. 541, 542, and 544, the
Motorcycles are property of the Estate and, on or before September
23, 2024, Mr. Cao shall turn the Motorcycles over to the Estate via
delivery of the same to the Trustee, including without limitation,
by signing over legal ownership.
-- Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Secs. 541, 549 and 550, insofar as
the Motorcycles were transferred to Mr. Cao on or about October 6,
2022, such transfer was an avoidable unauthorized post-petition
transfer of property of the Estate and, on or before September 23,
2024, Mr. Cao as initial transferee shall turn the Motorcycles over
to the Estate via delivery of the same to the Trustee, including
without limitation, by signing over legal ownership, or turn the
value of the Motorcycles over to the Estate via delivery of the
same to the Trustee.
The Trustee is authorized to take all actions necessary or
appropriate to effectuate this Order.
A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=TGM2sM
About Ho Wan Kwok
Ho Wan Kwok sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 22-50073) on Feb. 15, 2022. Judge
Julie A. Manning oversees the case. Dylan Kletter, Esq., is the
Debtor's legal counsel.
Ho Wan Kwok aka Guo Wengui is an exiled Chinese businessman.
According to Reuters, Guo was a former real estate magnate who fled
China for the U.S. in 2014 ahead of corruption charges. Guo filed
for bankruptcy after a New York court ordered him to pay lender
Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund $254 million stemming from a
contract dispute. PAX had initially loaned two of Guo's companies
$100 million in 2008 for a construction project in Beijing and sued
Guo when he failed to pay off the loan.
An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in
the case and is represented by Pullman & Comley, LLC.
Luc A. Despins was appointed Chapter 11 Trustee in the case.
HOMESPUN LLC: Hires Houlihan Lawrence as Real Estate Broker
-----------------------------------------------------------
Homespun, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York to employ Houlihan Lawrence as real
estate broker.
The firm will market and sell the Debtor's miscellaneous equipment,
inventory, and leasehold interests located at 232 Main Street,
Beacon, New York; and at Dia:Beacon, 3 Beekman Street, Beacon, New
York.
The firm will be paid a commission of 5 percent of the sales
price.
As disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Jo-Ann Campagiorni
Houlihan Lawrence
1989 Route 52
East Fishkill, NY 12533
Tel: (845) 227-4400
About Homespun, LLC
Homespun, LL, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 24-35813) on August 15, 2024. The Debtor hires
Genova, Malin & Trier, LLP as counsel.
HOMESPUN LLC: Hires Sword Law LLC as Special Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
Homespun, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York to employ Sword Law LLC as special
counsel.
The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its rights regarding the
transactional elements of the sale of its assets, including the
negotiation of the Asset Purchase Agreement and related closing
documents and the closing thereof.
The firm will be paid at the rate of $400 per hour.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Michael D. Sword, Esq., a partner at Sword Law LLC, disclosed in a
court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Michael D. Sword, Esq.
Sword Law LLC
692 Jewett Avenue
Staten Island, NY 10314
Tel: (646) 522-3960
About Homespun, LLC
Homespun, LL, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 24-35813) on August 15, 2024. The Debtor hires
Genova, Malin & Trier, LLP as counsel.
HYPERSCALE DATA: Holds 17.1% Equity Stake in Algorhythm Holdings
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hyperscale Data, Inc. formerly known as Ault Alliance, Inc.,
disclosed in a Schedule 13D/A Report that the Company and its
affiliates -- Ault Lending, LLC, Milton C. Ault, III, Kenneth S.
Cragun, Henry C. W. Nisser, and James M. Turner -- beneficially
owned shares of Algorhythm Holdings, Inc.'s common stock.
The aggregate percentage of Shares reported owned by each Reporting
Person herein is based upon 9,736,850 Shares outstanding, which is
the total number of Shares outstanding as of August 16, 2024, as
reported in the Issuer's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 19, 2024.
A. Hyperscale Data
(a) As of the date hereof, Hyperscale Data may be deemed to
beneficially own 1,667,092 Shares, consisting of Shares held by
Ault Lending. Hyperscale Data may be deemed to beneficially own the
Shares beneficially owned by Ault Lending by virtue of its
relationship with such entity described in Item 2.
Percentage: 17.1%
B. Ault Lending
(a) As of the date hereof, Ault Lending beneficially owns
1,667,092 Shares held directly by it.
Percentage: 17.1%
C. Milton C. Ault, III
(a) As of the date hereof, Mr. Ault may be deemed to
beneficially own 1,667,092 Shares, consisting of Shares held by
Ault Lending. Mr. Ault may be deemed to beneficially own the Shares
beneficially owned by Ault Lending by virtue of his relationship
with such entity described in Item 2.
Percentage: 17.1%
D. Kenneth S. Cragun
(a) As of the date hereof, Mr. Cragun beneficially owned
19,535 Shares, which represents (i) 18,868 shares of Common Stock
held directly by him and (ii) 667 shares of Common Stock underlying
certain stock options which are currently exercisable.
Percentage: Less than 1%
E. Henry C. W. Nisser
(a) As of the date hereof, Mr. Nisser beneficially owned 667
Shares, which are issuable upon the exercise of stock options that
are currently exercisable.
Percentage: Less than 1%
F. James M. Turner
(a) As of the date hereof, Mr. Turner beneficially owned 19,535
Shares, which represents (i) 18,868 shares of Common Stock held
directly by him and (ii) 667 shares of Common Stock underlying
certain stock options which are currently exercisable.
Percentage: Less than 1%
(c) Other than 18,868 shares of Common Stock that were awarded
to Mr. Turner on August 8, 2024, pursuant to the Issuer's annual
director compensation plan, Mr. Turner has not entered into any
transactions in the Shares during the past sixty days.
A full-text copy of the Company's SEC Report is available at:
https://tinyurl.com/5fybftke
About Hyperscale Data
Hyperscale Data, Inc., formerly known as Ault Alliance, Inc., is a
diversified holding company pursuing growth by acquiring
undervalued businesses and disruptive technologies with a global
impact. Through its wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries and
strategic investments, Hyperscale Data owns and operates a data
center at which it mines Bitcoin and offers colocation and hosting
services for the emerging artificial intelligence ecosystems and
other industries. It also provides mission-critical products that
support a diverse range of industries, including a social gaming
platform, equipment rental services, defense/aerospace, industrial,
automotive, medical/biopharma, hotel operations and textiles. In
addition, Hyperscale Data is actively engaged in private credit and
structured finance through a licensed lending subsidiary.
Hyperscale Data's headquarters are located at 11411 Southern
Highlands Parkway, Suite 240, Las Vegas, NV 89141; Hyperscale Data,
Inc.
New York, New York-based Marcum LLP, the Company's auditor since
2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 16, 2024, citing that the Company has a working capital
deficiency, has incurred net losses, and needs to raise additional
funds to meet its obligations and sustain its operations. These
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.
As of June 30, 2024, the Company had $270.78 million in total
assets, $243.70 million in total liabilities, $795,000 in
redeemable non-controlling interests in equity of subsidiaries, and
$26.28 million in total stockholders' equity.
ILS PRODUCTS: Seeks to Hire Lane Law Firm as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
ILS Products, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Texas to employ Lane Law Firm PLLC as
counsel.
The firm will provide these services:
a. assist, advise and represent the Debtor relative to the
administration of the chapter 11 case;
b. assist, advise and represent the Debtor in analyzing the
Debtor's assets and liabilities, investigating the extent and
validity of lien and claims, and participating in and reviewing any
proposed asset sales or dispositions;
c. attend meetings and negotiate with the representatives of
the secured creditors;
d. assist the Debtor in the preparation, analysis, and
negotiation of any plan of reorganization and disclosure statement
accompanying any plan of reorganization;
e. take all necessary action to protect and preserve the
interests of the Debtor;
f. appear, as appropriate, before this Court, the Appellate
Courts, and other Courts in which matters may be heard and to
protect the interests of the Debtor before said Courts and the
United States Trustee; and
g. perform all other necessary legal services in these cases.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Robert C. Lane $595 per hour
Joshua Gordon $550 per hour
Associate Attorneys $500 per hour
Paraprofessionals $250 per hour
The firm received a retainer in the amount of $30,000.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Robert C. Lane, Esq., a partner at The Lane Law Firm, PLLC,
disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Robert C. Lane, Esq.
Joshua D. Gordon, Esq.
6200 Savoy, Suite 1150
Houston, TX 77036
Tel: (713) 595-8200
Fax: (713) 595-8201
Email: notifications@lanelaw.com
Joshua.gordon@lanelaw.com
About ILS Products, LLC
ILS Products LLC manufactures solar lighting systems, which include
light, light pole and all mounting hardware, for oil & gas, retail,
commercial, and farm & ranch applications.
ILS Products LLC sought relief under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 24-11040) on
August 29, 2024.
The Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Shad Robinson oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by Robert C. lane, Esq. of THE LANE LAW
FIRM.
INVO BIOSCIENCE: Fails to Meet Nasdaq Bid Price Requirement
-----------------------------------------------------------
INVO Bioscience, Inc. disclosed in a Form 8-K Report filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that the Company received a
letter from the staff of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC listing
qualifications group indicating that, based upon the closing bid
price of the Company's common stock for the 34 consecutive business
days prior to September 18, 2024, the Company is not currently in
compliance with the requirement to maintain a minimum bid price of
$1.00 per share for continued listing under Nasdaq Listing Rule
5550(a)(2).
The notice has no immediate effect on the listing of the Company's
common stock, and its common stock will continue to trade on The
Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol "INVO."
In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), the Company
has been provided an initial period of 180 calendar days, or until
May 17, 2025, to regain compliance with the minimum bid price
requirement. If at any time before May 17, 2025, the closing bid
price of the Company's common stock closes at or above $1.00 per
share for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days, Nasdaq will
provide written notification that the Company has achieved
compliance with the minimum bid price requirement, and the matter
would be resolved. If the Company does not regain compliance prior
to May 17, 2025, then Nasdaq may grant the Company a second 180
calendar day period to regain compliance, provided the Company (i)
meets the continued listing requirement for market value of
publicly-held shares and all other initial listing standards for
The Nasdaq Capital Market, other than the minimum closing bid price
requirement, and (ii) notifies Nasdaq of its intent to cure the
deficiency within such second 180 calendar day period, by effecting
a reverse stock split, if necessary.
The Company will continue to monitor the closing bid price of its
common stock and will consider implementing available options to
regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement under the
Nasdaq Listing Rules. If the Company does not regain compliance
with the minimum bid price requirement within the allotted
compliance periods, the Company will receive a written notification
from Nasdaq that its securities are subject to delisting. The
Company would then be entitled to appeal that determination to a
Nasdaq hearings panel. There can be no assurance that the Company
will regain compliance during either compliance period, or maintain
compliance with the other Nasdaq listing requirements.
About INVO Bioscience Inc.
INVO Bioscience, Inc. is a healthcare services fertility company
dedicated to expanding the assisted reproductive technology
marketplace by making fertility care more accessible and inclusive
to people around the world. Its commercial strategy is primarily
focused on operating fertility-focused clinics, which includes the
opening of dedicated "INVO Centers" offering the INVOcell and IVC
procedure (with three centers in North America now operational) and
the acquisition of US-based, profitable in vitro fertilization
clinics (with the first acquired in August 2023).
The Woodlands, Texas-based M&K CPAS, PLLC, the Company's auditor
since 2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated April 16, 2024, citing that the Company has suffered net
losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency, which
raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.
INVO BIOSCIENCE: Restates Financial Statements Due To SEC Review
----------------------------------------------------------------
INVO Bioscience, Inc. disclosed in a Form 8-K Report filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that the Company's
previously issued financial statements are being restated as a
result of an internal review of its previously issued financial
statements, which review was prompted by comments issued by the
staff of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission upon
its review of the Company's annual and quarterly reports filed
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1934, as amended. After review of
the staff's comments, discussions with the staff, and investigation
and further analysis, the Company has determined that, in
recognizing a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability
for its operating leases on its balance sheet, it incorrectly
utilized the applicable federal rates as the discount rates for the
valuation of the ROU asset and corresponding lease liability,
rather than the Company's incremental borrowing rates. The impact
of this error is limited to the Company's assets and liabilities,
and the error did not impact the Company's revenue, results of
operation, earnings (loss) per share, or net equity. The error has
not resulted in any change to the Company's business plan or
operations and does not impact any regulatory requirements or
management compensation.
On September 18, 2024, the Audit Committee of the Company, after
considering the recommendations of management, concluded that the
Company's previously issued consolidated financial statements as of
and for the periods ended June 30, 2024, March 31, 2024, December
31, 2023, September 30, 2023, June 30, 2023, March 31, 2023,
December 31, 2022, September 30, 2022, June 30, 2022, March 31,
2022, December 31, 2021, September 30, 2021, and June 30, 2021
should no longer be relied upon.
The Company intends to file amended Reports that will contain
restated financial statements that reflect adjustments of the value
of its ROU assets and corresponding lease liabilities. The
Company's management and the Audit Committee have discussed the
matters described herein with M&K CPA's, LLC, the Company's
independent registered public accounting firm.
About INVO Bioscience Inc.
INVO Bioscience, Inc. is a healthcare services fertility company
dedicated to expanding the assisted reproductive technology
marketplace by making fertility care more accessible and inclusive
to people around the world. Its commercial strategy is primarily
focused on operating fertility-focused clinics, which includes the
opening of dedicated "INVO Centers" offering the INVOcell and IVC
procedure (with three centers in North America now operational) and
the acquisition of US-based, profitable in vitro fertilization
clinics (with the first acquired in August 2023).
The Woodlands, Texas-based M&K CPAS, PLLC, the Company's auditor
since 2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated April 16, 2024, citing that the Company has suffered net
losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency, which
raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.
IR4C INC: Hits Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection
-----------------------------------------------
IR4C Inc. filed Chapter 11 protection in the Middle District of
Florida. According to court filing, the Debtor reports $7,922,422
in debt owed to 1 and 49 creditors. The petition states funds will
be available to unsecured creditors.
A meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. Section 341(a) is slated for
October 16, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. in Room Telephonically on telephone
conference line: 866-910-0293. participant access code: 7560574.
About IR4C Inc.
IR4C Inc., doing business as Yes.Fit and Make Yes Happen, owns the
real property located at 3715 Dranefield Road, Lakeland, Florida
having a comparable sale value of $4.2 million.
IR4C Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 24-05458) on September 13, 2024. In
the petition filed by Kevin D. Transue, as president, the Debtor
reports total assets of $4,280,839 and total liabilities of
$7,922,422.
The Debtor is represented by:
Samantha L Dammer, Esq.
BLEAKLEY BAVOL DENMAN & GRACE
15316 N. Florida Avenue
Tampa, FL 33613
Tel: (813) 221-3759
Email: sdammer@bbdglaw.com
JACKSON GARDENS: Hires Baker & Associates as Attorney
-----------------------------------------------------
Jackson Gardens, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Texas to employ Baker & Associates as
its attorney.
The firm will provide these services:
(a) analyze the financial situation, and render advice and
assistance to the Debtor;
(b) advise the Debtor with respect to its duties;
(c) prepare and file all appropriate legal papers;
(d) represent the Debtor at the first meeting of creditors and
such other services as may be required during the course of the
bankruptcy proceedings;
(e) represent the Debtor in all proceedings before the court
and in any other judicial or administrative proceeding where its
rights may be litigated or otherwise affected;
(f) prepare and file a Disclosure Statement (if required) and
Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization; and
(g) assist the Debtor in any matters relating to or arising out
of the captioned case.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Attorneys $475 to $525 per hour
Of Counsels $525 per hour
Paralegals $135 to $175 per hour
The firm received a retainer in the amount of $23,238.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Reese Baker, Esq., a partner at Baker & Associates, disclosed in a
court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached through:
Reese W. Baker, Esq.
Baker & Associates
950 Echo Lane Ste. 300
Houston, TX 77024
Tel: (713) 869-9200
Fax: (713) 869-9100
Email: courtdocs@bakerassociates.net
About Jackson Gardens, LLC
Jackson Gardens LLC is a Single Asset Real Estate debtor (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).
Jackson Gardens LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 24-34106) on September
3, 2024. In the petition filed by Mitchell Steiman, as manager, the
Debtor reports estimated assets between $100,000 and $500,000 and
estimated liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.
Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Eduardo V. Rodriguez handles the case.
The Debtor is represented by Reese Baker, Esq. of BAKER &
ASSOCIATES.
JBT MAREL: S&P Assigns 'BB' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB' issue-level and '3' recovery
ratings to JBT Marel Corp's proposed first-lien credit facilities.
S&P said, "Our stable outlook reflects our expectation that the
combined company will effectively control operating costs as demand
improves in 2025 resulting in S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to
EBITDA below 4x.
"Our 'BB' rating on JBT Marel reflects its wide range of products,
its global reach, and the relative stability of the food equipment
market it serves. These factors are somewhat offset by the
fragmentation of this end market, which we believe makes it more
competitive than more consolidated industries.
Furthermore--although we believe the combined company will have a
more profitable and flexible cost structure than JBT and Marel had
as independent entities--the integration presents challenges. We
believe management will continue to carefully mitigate cultural and
operating challenges such that S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to
EBITDA for the combined company will be below 4x in 2025.
"The combined company would offer a broad and sophisticated product
portfolio. We believe JBT Marel will be one of the largest food and
beverage equipment manufacturers globally. It will be bigger than
rated competitors Engineered Machinery Holdings Inc. (Duravant),
Pro Mach Group Inc., and Merlin Buyer Inc. (Fortifi Food Processing
Solutions). It will have a broad range of primary, secondary, and
further processing equipment and software offerings serving
poultry, beef, pork, seafood, fruit and vegetables, beverages, pet
food, convenience and ready meals, and warehouse automation
markets. Though the company's end of line packaging and filling
offerings are limited, it has the ability to provide complete,
digitally integrated food and beverage processing lines.
Competition will challenge JBT Marel's ability to increase
profitability. The market for food and beverage processing
equipment, parts, and software is large and fragmented, and the top
customers rank among the largest and strongest food and beverage
makers in the world, all of which combines to impede profitability.
Though the combined company will provide a broad product range with
leading technology, we believe customers can substitute one
manufacturer's equipment for another's. Over the past 10 years,
both companies have reported an EBITDA margin of about 10%-18%,
which we consider roughly average for manufacturer. However,
performance has been volatile over this period.
JBT and Marel have the opportunity to leverage each other's
strengths. JBT focuses on controlling manufacturing, product
development, and administrative costs. As a result, it benefits
from good factory utilization and solid operating leverage on
organic growth. Marel has a long history of innovation and offers a
good portfolio of intellectual property and innovation capability.
In 2025, JBT Marel's cost structure will probably approximate an
average of the two separate companies. S&P said, "In 2026, we
anticipate profitability will expand as the company improves
factory and distribution center utilization across the combined
footprint, allowing it to reduce capital expenditure (capex)
somewhat and modestly improve free cash flow generation. A larger
organization is also likely in a better position to leverage
Marel's intellectual property portfolio and innovation expertise,
which should translate into improved profitability over the longer
term."
Integration presents a significant risk. JBT and Marel have limited
experience of large business combinations. S&P said, "We believe
JBT Marel will retain key leaders from both companies, and we think
management will be able to largely mitigate cultural differences.
We believe the companies will have mutual respect for the strength
of the other--JBT's discipline and focus and Marel's innovation.
Though some administrative rationalization and supplier
consolidation will likely take place relatively quickly and easily,
we anticipate some aspects of integration, synergy realization, and
footprint reduction will occur more slowly and carefully."
Dependence on the food and beverage industries is another risk, in
our view. S&P said, "We consider manufacturers that serve a single
category of applications or related industries as riskier than
those that serve a wider assortment. Still, JBT Marel offers a
range of solutions for minimally processed to ultra-processed foods
and beverages that are spread across a breadth of markets. We
believe this partially mitigates the risk that changing consumer
preferences weaken demand for products made with the company's
equipment."
Still, food and beverage consumption stabilize demand for related
equipment. Sales of JBT's and Marel's original equipment weakened
in 2009 and 2020, but the company's consolidated revenue declines
in these two years were smaller than the decline many manufacturers
S&P rates experienced. Additionally, about half of the combined
company's revenue will come from higher-margin aftermarket parts,
demand for which is less cyclical than new equipment.
A better outlook for chicken production should benefit JBT Marel
over the next 18 months. A lower price of commodity chicken, high
grain prices, and avian influenza combined to hurt JBT's and
Marel's equipment sales to large producers in 2023 and the first
half of 2024--the combined company's largest end
market--illustrating the hazard of concentration. That said, S&P
anticipates chicken producers will increase investment in the
second half of 2024 and 2025 as price and input cost trends
reverse. Additionally, inflation-stretched consumers may substitute
more expensive protein with chicken over this period.
S&P said, "We forecast mid-single-digit percent growth in 2025.
Demand has been soft in the first half of 2024 as customers have
invested cautiously. Orders at both companies fell somewhat in the
second quarter of 2024, compared with last year. We think real
growth of only 1.5%-2% in the U.S. and Eurozone will keep customers
relatively cautious about large expansion projects over the next 18
months. Our 2025 forecast includes no material cross-selling
benefits as we anticipate these will take about a year to pick up.
However, this opportunity does support our forecast for continued
solid growth in 2026 and beyond.
"We anticipate profitability will improve in 2025. Acquisition
costs of about $40 million will elevate sales, general, and
administrative (SG&A) and depress profitability in 2024, but we
assume these will not recur next year. We forecast synergy benefits
will cover related costs in 2025. We believe research and
development (R&D) spending will be roughly flat in 2024 in response
to a soft demand environment and in 2025 as the combined company
finds incremental efficiencies.
"The stable outlook on JBT Marel reflects our expectation that the
combined company will effectively control operating costs as demand
improves in 2025 resulting in S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to
EBITDA below 4x.
"We could lower our rating on JBT Marel if we expect its adjusted
debt to EBITDA will be above 4x over the next 12 months. This could
occur if growth underperforms our expectations or if the
integration encounters unexpected challenges."
Although unlikely within the next year, S&P could raise its rating
on JBT Marel if:
-- It deleverages by reducing its adjusted debt to EBITDA below 3x
and S&P believes the company's financial policy will keep it below
this level on a sustained basis; and
-- S&P views its position within its competitive and fragmented
market as comparable to that of similarly rated manufacturers, as
demonstrated, for example, by the company's profitability and
organic growth trajectory.
JOHAL BROTHERS: Hires Kroger Gardis & Regas LLP as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Johal Brothers Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Indiana to employ Kroger Gardis &
Regas, LLP as counsel.
The firm will provide these services:
a. prepare filings and applications and conducting examinations
necessary to the administration of these matters;
b. advise regarding Debtors' rights, duties, and obligations as
debtors-in-possession;
c. perform legal services associated with and necessary to the
day-today operations of the business;
d. represent and assist Debtor(s) in complying with the duties
and obligations imposed by the Bankruptcy Code, the orders of this
Court, and applicable law;
e. represent Debtor(s) at hearings and other proceedings before
this Court;
f. make negotiation, preparation, confirmation, and
consummation of a plan of reorganization; and
g. take any and all other necessary action incident to the
proper preservation and administration of the state in the conduct
of Debtors' business.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Harley K. Means, Partner $395 per hour
Weston E. Overturf, Partner $395 per hour
Anthony T. Carreri, Associate $325 per hour
Jason T. Mizzell, Associate $325 per hour
Kimberly Whigham, Paralegal $175 per hour
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Harley K. Means, Esq., a partner at Kroger Gardis & Regas, LLP,
disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Harley K. Means, Esq.
Kroger Gardis & Regas, LLP
111 Monument Circle, Suite 900
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Tel: (317) 777-7434
Email: hmeans@kgrlaw.com
About Johal Brothers Inc.
Johal Brothers Inc. is an Indianapolis-based company operating in
the general freight trucking industry.
The Debtor filed a petition under Chapter 11, Subchapter V of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case No. 24-04679) on August 28,
2024, with $581,500 in assets and $1,437,032 in liabilities.
Amritpaul S. Johal, president and chief executive officer, signed
the petition.
Judge James M. Carr presides over the case.
Harley K. Means, Esq., at Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP represents
the Debtor as legal counsel.
JOHNSON ENTERPRISES: Hires Steinberg Shapiro & Clark as Attorney
----------------------------------------------------------------
Johnson Enterprises-Johnson Wash Systems, LLC seeks approval from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to
hire Steinberg Shapiro & Clark to handle its Chapter 11 case.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Mark H. Shapiro $400 per hour
Tracy M. Clark $375 per hour
The retainer is $15,000.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Mark H. Shapiro, Esq., a partner at Steinberg Shapiro & Clark,
disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Mark H. Shapiro, Esq.
STEINBERG SHAPIRO & CLARK
25925 Telegraph Road, Suite 203
Southfield, MI 48033
Tel: (248) 352-4700
Email: shapiro@steinbergshapiro.com
About Johnson Enterprises
Johnson Enterprises-Johnson Wash Systems, LLC operated a design,
manufacturing, and installation business for truck washing systems.
It is one of only a handful of such businesses in the United States
and typically serves companies that maintain fleets of trucks.
Johnson Enterprises-Johnson Wash Systems, LLC sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich.
Case No. 24-31570) on August 22, 2024, with $50,001 to $100,000 in
assets and $100,001 to $500,000 in liabilities.
Judge Joel D. Applebaum presides over the case. Mark H. Shapiro,
Esq., represents the Debtor as legal counsel.
Charles Mouranie of CMM & Associates serves as Subchapter V
trustee.
JOONKO DIVERSITY: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity to Dec. 10
-------------------------------------------------------------
Joonko Diversity Inc. asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware to extend its exclusivity periods to file a
plan of reorganization and obtain acceptance thereof to December
10, 2024 and February 8, 2025, respectively.
Since the Petition Date, the Debtor has made significant and
material progress advancing the Chapter 11 Case. The only
impediment to confirmation of the Debtor's Plan is the claim being
asserted by Raz. Raz's entitlement to advancement is a gating issue
with respect to confirmation of the Plan.
The Debtor claims that it will require both written discovery and
Raz's deposition before proceeding to a hearing on the Debtor's
objection to her claim due to the factual nature of the Debtor's
objection to Raz's claim. To provide sufficient time to build the
necessary evidentiary record, the Debtor has adjourned the
Confirmation Hearing. The Debtor expects to be in a position to
proceed with confirmation of the Plan shortly after taking Raz's
deposition.
The Debtor asserts that it has made and will continue to make
timely payments on its undisputed post-petition obligations in the
ordinary course, meaning that the requested extension of the
Exclusive Periods will not prejudice the legitimate interests of
post-petition creditors. As such, this factor weighs in favor of
extending the Exclusive Periods.
The Debtor further asserts that granting the requested extensions
of the Exclusive Periods will not pressure the Debtor's creditors
or grant the Debtor any unfair bargaining leverage. The Plan
solicitation is complete and the Debtor has adjourned the
Confirmation Hearing solely to provide it the necessary time to
build the evidentiary record necessary to adjudicate the Raz Claim.
The Debtor is seeking extensions of the Exclusive Periods to ensure
that there is sufficient time to properly adjudicate the Raz Claim
free from unnecessary distraction or competing plan proposals.
Joonko Diversity Inc. is represented by:
David R. Hurst, Esq.
McDermott Will & Emery LLP
The Brandywine Building
1000 N West Street, Suite 1400
Wilmington, DE 19801
Phone: (302) 485-3930
Email: dhurst@mwe.com
Catherine Lee, Esq.
444 West Lake Street, Suite 4000
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Telephone: (312) 372-2000
Facsimile: (312) 984-7700
Email: clee@mwe.com
About Joonko Diversity Inc.
Joonko Diversity Inc. is an AI-powered employee recruitment
venture.
Joonko Diversity sought relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 24-11007) on May 14, 2024. In the
petition filed by Ilan Band, as chief executive officer, the Debtor
estimated assets between $1 million and $10 million and estimated
liabilities up to $50,000.
McDermott Will & Emery LLP, led by David R. Hurst, is the Debtor's
counsel.
LEE INVESTMENT: Sec. 341(a) Meeting of Creditors on Oct. 15
-----------------------------------------------------------
Lee Investment Consultants LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in the
Northern District of Alabama. According to court filing, the Debtor
reports between $1 million and $10 million in debt owed to 1 and 49
creditors. The petition states funds will not be available to
unsecured creditors.
A meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. Section 341(a) is slated for
October 15, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. at Creditor Meeting Room.
About Lee Investment Consultants LLC
Lee Investment Consultants LLC is a limited liability company.
Lee Investment Consultants LLC sought relief under Subchapter V of
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No.
24-41078) on September 11, 2024. In the petition filed by Scott
Lee, as president, the Debtor reports estimated assets and
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million each.
The Honorable Bankruptcy Judge James J. Robinson handles the case.
The Debtor is represented by:
Stacy Upton, Esq.
THE LAW OFFICES OF HARRY P. LONG, LLC
914 Noble Street Suite 1A
Anniston AL 36201
Tel: 256-237-3266
Email: Stacy@uptonlawllc.com
LEFEVER MATTSON: Sec. 341(a) Meeting of Creditors on Oct. 21
------------------------------------------------------------
A meeting of creditors of LeFever Mattson under 11 U.S.C. Section
341(a) is slated for Oct. 21, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. via UST
Teleconference, Call in number/URL: 1-888-455-8838 Passcode:
4169593.
About LeFever Mattson
LeFever Mattson, a California corporation, manages a large real
estate portfolio. Timothy LeFever and Kenneth W. Mattson each own
50% of the equity in LeFever Mattson.
LeFever Mattson manages a portfolio of more than 200 properties,
comprised of commercial, residential, office, and mixed-use real
estate, as well as vacant land, located throughout Northern
California, primarily in Sonoma, Sacramento, and Solano Counties.
The Debtors generate income from the Properties through rents and
use the proceeds to fund their operations.
On Sept. 12, 2024, LeFever Mattson and 58 affiliated LLCs and LPs
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Lead Case No.
24-10545).
LeFever Mattson estimated $100 million to $500 million in total
assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.
The Debtors tapped San Francisco, California-based KELLER
BENVENUTTI KIM LLP as counsel. KURTZMAN CARSON CONSULTANTS, LLC,
doing business as VERITA GLOBAL, is the claims agent.
LERETA LLC: Moody's Cuts CFR & Sr. Secured First Lien Debt to Caa1
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings downgraded LERETA, LLC's corporate family rating to
Caa1 from B3, probability of default rating to Caa2-PD from B3-PD
and senior secured first lien bank credit facilities to Caa1 from
B3. The rated facilities include the $40 million senior secured
revolving credit facility expiring 2026, $250 million senior
secured term loan maturing 2028. The outlook remains stable. LERETA
is a California-based technology enabled property tax and flood
determination service provider to the financial services industry.
The rating downgrades reflect Moody's expectations for mortgage
origination volumes to remain subdued over the next 12-18 months,
leading to limited revenue growth, very high debt to EBITDA
leverage well over 7.5x, negative cash flow, low cash balances and
limited committed external liquidity resources. LERETA's revenue,
profits and cash flow are dependent upon mortgage origination
activity. ESG governance considerations, notably financial
strategies including a tolerance for very high leverage and little
liquidity, were key drivers of the ratings downgrades.
RATINGS RATIONALE
The Caa1 CFR reflects LERETA's weak liquidity profile, small
revenue scale, narrow operating scope with exposure to the US
mortgage finance market and economic cycles and high debt leverage
for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2024. Moody's expect that
revenue contributions from the 2023 acquisition of Info-Pro Lender
Services Inc. (Info-Pro), cost and cash flow benefits from the
company's ongoing technology re-platforming project and recent cost
rationalization measures could drive improvements in credit metrics
over the next 12-18 months, but liquidity will remain weak amid
highly uncertain mortgage origination volumes.
All financial metrics cited reflect Moody's standard adjustments.
In addition, Moody's expense capitalized software costs.
Recent and large equity infusions to fund internal investments and
the acquisition provide support to the credit profile and indicate
a likely high recovery to secured creditors at default. However,
the probable need for additional equity investments to avoid
default is a key driver of the downgrades and pressures the credit
profile.
LERETA benefits from a stable and very diverse customer base with
over 2,000 customers that includes national level and regional
lenders and mortgage servicers. The company performs an essential
part of the mortgage process and manages tax records and payments
for over 22,000 tax agencies nationally. Outsourcing this process
to a vendor such a LERETA is a cost-efficient way to manage the
large volume of tax reporting that needs to be done by a lender.
Moody's expect the outsourcing trend to continue, supporting
earnings growth once the mortgage market recovers. LERETA is the
second largest tax servicer nationally and counts many of the
largest national mortgage originators as clients, which provides a
steady volume of loans to service. The credit profile is also
supported by strong customer retention with an average customer
tenor of six years.
The downgrade of the PDR by two notches to Caa2-PD from B3-PD
reflects Moody's anticipation for a high risk of default over the
next two years. The Caa1 senior secured first lien credit facility
ratings are in line with the Caa1 CFR as there is no other
meaningful debt in the capital structure and reflects Moody's
expectation for a high recovery for creditors at default. The
senior secured first lien credit facilities benefit from secured
guarantees from all existing and subsequently acquired wholly-owned
domestic subsidiaries.
Moody's view LERETA's liquidity as weak, driven by Moody's
anticipation for negative cash flow over the next 12 to 15 months
and limited external liquidity sources. The $40 million revolver
was almost entirely drawn as of June 30, 2024. The company had an
additional $8 million of equity commitments from its financial
sponsors as of June 30, 2024. The credit facilities are subject to
a leverage-based financial maintenance covenant. Although recent
and large equity investments have been funded, Moody's liquidity
analysis does not incorporate expectations for additional external
liquidity unless it is contractual.
The stable outlook reflects Moody's anticipation for very high debt
leverage and poor liquidity, but also a high recovery at default.
FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS
The ratings could be upgraded if Moody's expect: 1) positive free
cash flow and an improved liquidity profile; 2) a quicker rebound
in the mortgage market, that would translate into high revenue
growth or a material increase in size and scale via organic growth;
and 2) leverage to fall, with debt-to-EBITDA sustained below 7.0x.
A ratings downgrade could result if Moody's anticipate a default is
more likely in the near term or expect an average or low recovery
for secured creditors in a default scenario.
The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Services published in November 2021.
Headquartered in Pomona, California, LERETA is a technology enabled
property tax and flood determination service provider to the
financial services industry. The company provides services in the
areas of tax certification management and flood determination to
mortgage originators and servicers. LERETA is owned by affiliates
of financial sponsors Flexpoint Ford and Vestar Capital Partners.
The company generated $133 million in net revenue for the LTM
period ended June 30, 2024.
LIDO 10 LLC: Hires Wiegel Szekel & Frisby as Accountant
-------------------------------------------------------
LIDO 10, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California to employ Wiegel, Szekel & Frisby as
accountant.
The firm will prepare and file the Debtor's 2023 tax returns and
2024 tax returns, and all related work.
The firm will be paid at a flat fee of $3,000.
Gabriel Frisby, a partner at Wiegel, Szekel & Frisby, disclosed in
a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Gabriel Frisby
Wiegel, Szekel & Frisby
500 N. State College Blvd, Suite 1110
Orange, CA 92868
Tel: (714) 634-8757
Fax: (714) 634-9689
Email: cpa@wsfcpa.com
About Lido 10 LLC
Lido 10 LLC is a limited liability company.
Lido 10 LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 24-11818) on July 19, 2024. In the
petition filed by Ronald L. Meer, president of the sole managing
member of the Debtor's sole managing member, the Debtor reports
estimated assets and liabilities between $10 million and $50
million each.
The Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Theodor Albert oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by:
Matthew D. Resnik, Esq.
RHM LAW LLP
17609 Ventura Blvd. Ste 314
Encino, CA 91316
Tel: (818) 285-0100
Fax: (818) 855-7013
Email: matt@rhmfirm.com
LINCOLN HIGHWAY: Starts Subchapter V Bankruptcy Proceeding
----------------------------------------------------------
Lincoln Highway RG Associates LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in
the District of New Jersey. According to court documents, the
Debtor reports between $1 million and $10 million in debt owed to 1
and 49 creditors. The petition states funds will be available to
unsecured creditors.
About Lincoln Highway RG Associates LLC
Lincoln Highway RG Associates LLC is primarily engaged in renting
and leasing real estate properties.
Lincoln Highway RG Associates LLC sought relief under Subchapter V
of Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No.
24-19036) on Sept. 12, 2024. In the petition filed by Ricardo
Romero, as managing member, the Debtor reports estimated assets and
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million each.
The Debtor is represented by:
Carol L. Knowlton, Esq.
GORSKI & KNOWLTON PC
311 Whitehorse Ave
Suite A
Hamilton, NJ 08610
Tel: 609-964-4000
Fax: 609-528-0721
Email: cknowlton@gorskiknowlton.com
LNB-001-13 LLC: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
--------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 21, until further notice, will not
appoint an official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter
11 case of LNB-001-13, LLC, according to court dockets.
About LNB-001-13
LNB-001-13, LLC filed Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case
No. 24-18450) on August 20, 2024, with $1 million to $10 million in
both assets and liabilities.
Judge Robert A. Mark oversees the case.
Joel Aresty, Esq., at Joel M. Aresty, PA is the Debtor's legal
counsel.
LW RETAIL: Unsecureds to be Paid in Full in Sale Plan
-----------------------------------------------------
LW Retail Associates LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of New York a Disclosure Statement in
connection with Plan of Reorganization dated August 22, 2024.
The Debtor is a New York limited liability company duly formed
under the laws of the State of New York and maintains its principal
place of business at c/o Heights Advisors, 140 Remsen Street,
Brooklyn, New York 11201.
The Debtor owns four commercial condominium units (the "Commercial
Units") in the Loft Space Condominium located at 78-80 Leonard
Street, New York, New York and 79-81 Worth Street New York, New
York. The Commercial Units are leased to Millennium Sports
Management Company LLC, which in turn subleases the units to
subtenants.
The Debtor's financial distress came from years of protracted
litigation with the Board of Managers of the Loft Space Condominium
(the "Condo"). In 2012, the Condo initiated a lawsuit (the
"Construction Defect Action") against the Debtor and Sponsor
alleging, inter alia, the Sponsor failed to maintain the building
free of hazardous conditions. In 2015, the Debtor initiated a
lawsuit (the "Reserve Fund Action") against the Board alleging
waste and diversion of condominium assets, including misuse of a
reserve fund, resulting in disputed over-assessments to the Debtor.
In 2016, the Board commenced an action (the "Foreclosure Action")
to foreclosure liens stemming from the disputed assessments against
the Debtor and sought appointment of a receiver. With its property
in jeopardy, the Debtor sought protection from the Bankruptcy
Court. On October 5, 2017, the Debtor filed a voluntary petition
for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.
Class 3 consists of the Allowed Unsecured Claims. The holders of
the Allowed Class 3 General Unsecured Claims shall be paid up to
the full amount of their Allowed Claim, in Cash, upon the sale of
the Property. The Debtor estimates that Class 3 Allowed Unsecured
Claims total approximately $30,634.11 representing the prepetition
claim of tax certiorari counsel Lawrence J. Berger P.C. Class 3
Creditors are not Impaired under this Plan and the holder thereof
shall be deemed to accept the Plan.
Class 4 consists of the claims of GAMCREFK TRUST, the holder of
equity Interests in the Debtor. The holder of Allowed Interests
shall retain all of its Interests in the Debtor. The Allowed Class
4 Interests are not Impaired under this Plan, and the holder
thereof shall be deemed to accept the Plan.
The Plan shall be funded by the Refinance in an amount necessary to
fund all Allowed Claims on the Effective Date.
The Refinance and Ownership Transfer, shall be free and clear of
all pre-closing liens, Claims, encumbrances, other interests,
debts, causes of action, obligations, liabilities, and charges of
any kind, nature or description whatsoever, whether fixed or
contingent, legal or equitable, perfected or unperfected except as
expressly provided in the respective contract of sale pursuant to
Sections 363(b), (f), (k) and (m) and 1123(b)(4) and 1129 of the
Bankruptcy Code (collectively, the "Liens and Claims").
A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 22, 2024
is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=61S8YP from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.
Attorneys for the Debtor:
KIRBY AISNER & CURLEY, LLP
Dawn Kirby, Esq.
700 Post Road, Suite 237
Scarsdale, New York 10583
(914) 401-9500
About LW Retail Associates
Brooklyn, N.Y.-based LW Retail Associates, LLC owns a fee-simple
interest in four condominium units in New York.
LW Retail Associates filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
Case No. 17-45189) on Oct. 5, 2017. In the petition signed by Louis
Greco, manager, the Debtor disclosed $12.64 million in assets and
$6.25 million in liabilities. The Debtor valued its four condo
units at $12.20 million in the aggregate.
Judge Elizabeth S. Stong oversees the case.
The Debtor tapped DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr,
LLP as bankruptcy counsel, and Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP
and Sills Cummis & Gross P.C. as special counsel.
MACADAMIA BEAUTY: Hires Ross Smith & Binford PC as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Macadamia Beauty, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Texas to employ Ross Smith & Binford,
PC as counsel.
The firm will provide these services:
a. serve as counsel of record for the Debtor in all legal
aspects of the Bankruptcy Case, including without limitation, the
prosecution of actions on behalf of the Debtor;
b. prepare pleadings in connection with the Bankruptcy Case;
and
c. appear before the Court to represent the interests of the
Debtor in connection with the Bankruptcy Case.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Shareholders $650 per hour
Associates and Counsel $400 to $600 per hour
Paraprofessionals $150 per hour
Prior to the Petition Date, the firm received a $20,000 retainer
paid by Mr. Henry Stein, the Debtor's CEO.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Jason Binford, Esq., a partner at Ross, Smith & Binford, PC,
disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Jason Binford, Esq.
Ross Smith & Binford, PC
2003 N. Lamar Blvd., Suite 100
Austin, TX 78705
Tel: (512) 351-4778
Fax: (214) 377-9409
Email: jason.binford@rsbfirm.com
About Macadamia Beauty, LLC
Macadamia Beauty LLC -- https://www.macadamiahair.com -- is an
oil-based hair repair company based in Plano, Texas. Its unique
oil-infused hair repair products effectively address the most
common hair dissatisfactions among women: breakage, frizz, damage,
and dryness.
Macadamia Beauty LLC sought relief under Subchapter V of Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 24-41929) on
August 19, 2024. In the petition filed by Henry Stein, as CEO, the
Debtor reports estimated assets and liabilities between $1 million
and $10 million each.
The Debtor is represented by:
Frances A. Smith, Esq.
ROSS, SMITH & BINFORD, PC
700 N. Pearl Street 1610
Dallas TX 75201
Tel: (214) 593-4976
E-mail: frances.smith@rsbfirm.com
MARCUSE COMPANIES: Submits Three-Month Extended Budget
------------------------------------------------------
The Marcuse Companies, Inc. filed with the U.S Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Texas an extended budget in accordance
with the court's prior order, which authorized the company's
continued use of cash collateral.
The extended budget, which covers the period from October 1 to
December 31, 2024, is deemed approved due to the lack of timely
opposition from interested parties. This budget outlines key
financial projections essential for the company's operational
stability. With an initial cash balance of $94,536.28 in October
2024, the company anticipates steady cash receipts of approximately
$120,920 monthly.
The budget details expected expenditures, including payroll,
payroll taxes, property taxes, sales tax, and various operational
costs. Total cash payments are projected to be $108,751.57 in
October, $104,701.57 in November, and $107,751.57 in December.
The net cash change for each month reflects a positive cash flow
trend, with projected increases of $12,168.43 for October,
$17,542.43 for November, and $13,168.43 for December. By the end of
December 2024, the company expects to achieve an ending cash
position of $137,415.57.
About The Marcuse Companies
The Marcuse Companies, Inc., operating as Marcuse & Son, Inc.,
primarily engages in the field of construction and home
improvement. The company offers a range of services, including
general contracting, renovations, and repairs. Its operational
focus is on providing quality craftsmanship and customer service in
various residential and commercial projects.
The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Texas. Case No. 22-43146) with
$137,415 in assets and $321,204 in liabilities. Joseph F.
Postnikoff, signed the petition.
Judge Edward L. Morris presides the case.
Joseph F. Postnikoff, Esq., at Rochelle McCullough, LLP represents
the Debtor as legal counsel.
MARIANAS PROPERTIES: Hires Dentons Bingham as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Marianas Properties, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Guam to employ Dentons Bingham Greenebaum
LLP as counsel.
The firm's services include:
(a) advising the Debtor with regard to the requirements of the
Court, Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules, Local Rules, and the
Office of the United States Trustee, as they pertain to the
Debtor;
(b) advising the Debtor with regard to certain rights and
remedies of the bankruptcy estate and rights, claims, and interests
of creditors;
(c) representing the Debtor in any proceeding or hearing in the
Court involving the estate, unless the Debtor is represented in
such proceeding or hearing by other special counsel;
(d) conducting examinations of witnesses, claimants, or adverse
parties, and representing the Debtor in any adversary proceeding
(except to the extent that any such adversary proceeding is in an
area outside of our expertise);
(e) reviewing and analyzing various claims of the Debtor's
creditors and treatment of such claims and preparing, filing, or
prosecuting any objections thereto or initiating appropriate
proceedings regarding leases or contracts to be rejected or
assumed;
(f) preparing and assisting the Debtor with the preparation of
reports, applications, pleadings, motions, and orders;
(g) assisting in the negotiation, formulation, preparation, and
confirmation of a plan of reorganization or a sale of the Debtor's
assets, should that be appropriate; and
(h) performing any other services that may be appropriate in our
representation of the Debtor in its Chapter 11 case.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Andrew Helman, Office Managing Partner $675 per hour
Kyle D. Smith, Managing Associate $450 per hour
David K. Boydstun, Associate $370 per hour
Samantha Hayes, Paralegal $270 per hour
The firm currently holds a retainer in the amount of $29,055.50.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Andrew C. Helman, Esq., a partner at Dentons Bingham Greenebaum
LLP, disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Andrew C. Helman, Esq.
Dentons Bingham Greenebaum LLP
One City Center, Suite 11100
Portland, ME 04101
Tel: (207) 619-0919
Email: andrew.helman@dentons.com
About Marianas Properties, LLC
Marianas Properties, LLC in Tumon, GU, sought relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code filed its voluntary petition for Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. D. Guam Case No. 24-00013) on Sept. 12, 2024,
listing as much as $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities. Ajay Pothen as president, signed the petition.
Judge Frances M Tydingco-Gatewood oversees the case.
DENTONS BINGHAM GREENEBAUM LLP serve as the Debtor's legal counsel.
LAW OFFICES OF MINAKSHI V. HEMLANI, P.C. as local counsel.
GIBBINS ADVISORS, LLC as financial advisor.
MARIANAS PROPERTIES: Hires Gibbins Advisors as Financial Advisor
----------------------------------------------------------------
Marianas Properties, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Guam to employ Gibbins Advisors, LLC as
financial advisor.
The firm's services include:
(a) assisting the Debtor and its advisors in restructuring
efforts;
(b) assisting the Debtor with development and maintenance of a
13-week cash projection and other cash management and reporting
activities;
(c) assisting and supporting the Debtor regarding bankruptcy
reporting and other related compliance;
(d) providing services to assist the Debtor in the
administration of its chapter 11 case, including but not limited to
support related to motions and other required filings, claims
reconciliation, and assumption and rejection analyses;
(e) assisting the Debtor in connection with efforts to realize
its assets and development of restructuring plans which may include
a disclosure statement and chapter 11 plan;
(f) supporting and advising the Debtor in communications and
negotiations with key creditor and other constituents; and
(g) performing such other services in connection with the
restructuring process as reasonably requested or directed by
authorized Company personnel, consistent with the role played by GA
professionals in this matter and not duplicative of services being
performed by other professionals in these proceedings.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Managing Director/Principal $675 to $810 per hour
Director/Senior Director $495 to $635 per hour
Associate/Senior Associate $360 to $470 per hour
Data Analyst $200 to $305 per hour
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Clare Moyla, a principal at Gibbins Advisors LLC, disclosed in a
court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Clare Moylan
Gibbins Advisors LLC
1900 Church Street, Suite 300
Nashville, TN 37203
Tel: (615) 696-6556
Email: cmoylan@gibbinsadvisors.com
About Marianas Properties, LLC
Marianas Properties, LLC in Tumon, GU, sought relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code filed its voluntary petition for Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. D. Guam Case No. 24-00013) on Sept. 12, 2024,
listing as much as $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities. Ajay Pothen as president, signed the petition.
Judge Frances M Tydingco-Gatewood oversees the case.
DENTONS BINGHAM GREENEBAUM LLP serve as the Debtor's legal counsel.
LAW OFFICES OF MINAKSHI V. HEMLANI, P.C. as local counsel.
GIBBINS ADVISORS, LLC as financial advisor.
MARIANAS PROPERTIES: Hires Minakshi V. Hemlani as Local Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Marianas Properties, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Guam to employ the Law Offices of
Minakshi V. Hemlani, P.C. as local counsel.
The firm's services include:
(a) advising the Debtor with regard to the requirements of the
Court, Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules, Local Rules, and the
Office of the United States Trustee, as they pertain to the
Debtor;
(b) advising the Debtor with regard to certain rights and
remedies of the bankruptcy estate and rights, claims, and interests
of creditors and bringing such claims as the Debtor, in its
business judgment, pursue;
(c) representing the Debtor in any proceeding or hearing in the
Court involving the estate, unless the Debtor is represented in
such proceeding or hearing by other special counsel;
(d) representing the Debtor in any proceeding or hearing
regarding its outstanding insurance claim for damages incurred
during Typhoon Marwar;
(e) conducting examinations of witnesses, claimants, or adverse
parties, and representing the Debtor in any adversary proceeding
(except to the extent that any such adversary proceeding is in an
area outside of Minakshi V. Hemlani, P.C.’s expertise);
(f) reviewing and analyzing various claims of the Debtor’s
creditors and treatment of such claims and preparing, filing, or
prosecuting any objections thereto or initiating appropriate
proceedings regarding leases or contracts to be rejected or
assumed;
(g) preparing and assisting the Debtor with the preparation of
reports, applications, pleadings, motions, and orders, as well as
assisting with respect to bankruptcy schedules and statements;
(h) assisting in the negotiation, formulation, preparation, and
confirmation of a plan of reorganization and the preparation and
approval of a disclosure statement in connection with the plan of
reorganization or a sale of the Debtor’s assets, should that be
appropriate; and
(i) performing any other services that may be appropriate in the
firm's representation of the Debtor in this case.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Minakshi V. Hemlani $335 per hour
Yusuke Haffeman-Udugawa $225 per hour
The firm received from the Debtor a retainer of $35,000.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Minakshi V. Hemlani, Esq., a partner at Law Offices Of Minakshi V.
Hemlani, P.C., disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Minakshi V. Hemlani, Esq.
Law Offices Of Minakshi V. Hemlani, P.C.
285 Farenholt Ave., Suite C-312
Tamuning, Guam 96913
Tel: (671) 588-2030
Email: mvhemlani@mvhlaw.net
About Marianas Properties, LLC
Marianas Properties, LLC in Tumon, GU, sought relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code filed its voluntary petition for Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. D. Guam Case No. 24-00013) on Sept. 12, 2024,
listing as much as $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities. Ajay Pothen as president, signed the petition.
Judge Frances M Tydingco-Gatewood oversees the case.
DENTONS BINGHAM GREENEBAUM LLP serve as the Debtor's legal counsel.
LAW OFFICES OF MINAKSHI V. HEMLANI, P.C. as local counsel.
GIBBINS ADVISORS, LLC as financial advisor.
MARIANAS PROPERTIES: Pacific Star Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
-------------------------------------------------------------
Marianas Properties LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in the District
of Guam. According to court documents, the Debtor reports between
$10 million and $50 million in debt owed to 1 and 49 creditors. The
petition states funds will be available to unsecured creditors.
A meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. Section 341(a) is slated for
October 16, 2025 at 11:00 a.m. in Room Telephonically on telephone
conference line: 1-877-461-0585. participant access code:
5721781#.
About Marianas Properties LLC
Marianas Properties LLC, doing business as Pacific Star Resort &
Spa, is part of the traveler accommodation industry.
Marianas Properties LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Guam Case No. 24-00013) on September 12,
2024. In the petition filed by Ajay Pothen, as president, the
Debtor reports estimated assets and liabilities between $10 million
and $50 million each.
Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood oversees
the case.
The Debtor is represented by:
Minakshi V. Hemlani, Esq.
LAW OFFICES OF MINAKSHI V. HEMLANI, P.C.
285 Farenholt Ave, Suite C-312
Tamuning, GU 96913
Tel: 671-588-2030
Email: mvhemlani@mvhlaw.net
- and -
Andrew C. Helman, Esq.
DENTONS BINGHAM GREENEBAUM LLP
One City Center, Suite 11100
Portland, ME 04101
Tel: (207) 619-0919
EMAIL: andrew.helman@dentons.com
Debtor's
Financial
Advisor: GIBBINS ADVISORS, LLC
MARSHALL SPIEGEL: Smith Gambrell Awarded $415,000 in Total Fees
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Timothy A. Barnes of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Illinois made findings of facts and
conclusions of law in support of the order awarding to Smith
Gambrell & Russell LLP, counsel for Marshall Spiegel, interim
compensation and reimbursement of expenses:
TOTAL FEES REQUESTED: $451,952.00
TOTAL COSTS REQUESTED: $14,076.32
TOTAL FEES REDUCED: $49,989.10
TOTAL COSTS REDUCED: $968.86
TOTAL FEES ALLOWED: $401,962.90
TOTAL COSTS ALLOWED: $13,107.46
TOTAL FEES AND COSTS ALLOWED: $415,070.36
(1) Unreasonable Time - Total of disallowed amounts:
$5,802.90
The Court denies the allowance in part of compensation for certain
indicated task(s) since the professional or paraprofessional
expended an unreasonable amount of time on the task(s) in light of
the nature of the task(s), the experience and knowledge of the
professional performing the task(s), and the amount of time
previously expended by the professional or another on the task(s).
As to the time devoted to the preparation of the fee application
itself, the Court denies the allowance of compensation that is
disproportionate to the total hours in the main case. However, for
applications for compensation that request total fees of $10,000.00
or less, the Court will allow compensation for the time devoted to
the preparation of the fee application itself in the following
manner: For the first $5,000.00 of total compensation requested,
the Court will limit time devoted to preparation of the fee
application to 10% of total compensation requested and will allow
5% of additional total compensation requested for time devoted to
preparation of the fee application.
(2) Insufficient Description - Total of disallowed amounts:
$29,661.00
The Court denies the allowance of compensation for the indicated
task(s) as the description of each task fails to identify in a
reasonable manner the service rendered.
(3) Duplication of Services - Total of disallowed amounts:
$440.00
The Court denies the allowance of compensation for services that
duplicate those of another professional or paraprofessional.
(4) Clerical Work Not Compensable - Total of disallowed
amounts: $4,139.25
The Court disallows the compensation of clerical or stenographic
employees of the professional for the performance of routine
clerical or administrative activities in the normal course of the
professional's business, such as photocopying, secretarial work, or
routine filing. Such activities are not in the nature of
professional services and must be absorbed by the applicant's firm
as an overhead expense.
(5) Improper Allocation of Professional Resources - Total of
reduced amounts $4,139.94
The Court finds that $19,534.50 of the fees requested are for
compensation for 42.2 hours of work on tasks that could have been
performed by a beginning associate but was in fact performed by and
billed at the rate of a partner. The Court will allow compensation
of the affected time entries at the reduced rate of $364.80 per
hour.
The Court denies the allowance in part of compensation for the
indicated task(s) as a professional with a lower level of skill and
experience or a paraprofessional could have performed the task(s).
(6) Lumping - Total of disallowed amounts (10% of affected
entries): $4,837.15
The Court may impose a 10% penalty on entries that appear to be
"lumping." The Court will reduce each entry marked as such per the
penalty.
(7) Meal Expenses — Total of disallowed amounts: $968.86
The Court denies the allowance of reimbursement of this meal
expense.
A copy of the Court's decision dated September 12, 2024, is
available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=kwm56A
About Marshall Spiegel
Marshall Spiegel sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 20-21625) on Dec. 16,
2020. The Debtor is represented by David Lloyd, Esq.
MAVENIR SYSTEMS: Gets $35 Million Funding from Lenders
------------------------------------------------------
Reshmi Basu of Bloomberg News reports that some lenders to Mavenir
Systems have provided the network-software company with $35 million
to address its cash needs, according to people familiar with the
situation.
The closely held company will use around $20 million to finance
interest payments while the rest supports working capital needs,
said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing a
private matter.
A representative with Mavenir and its private equity owner Siris
Capital declined to comment.
Mavenir announced in late May that an existing investor would put
as much as $75 million into the company.
About Mavenir Systems Inc.
Mavenir Systems, Inc. provides software-based networking solutions.
The Company offers internet protocol based voice, videos,
communication, and messaging services, as well as multimedia
subsystem, evolved packet core, and session border controller.
MBMBA LLC: SARE Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
-------------------------------------------
MBMBA LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in the Southern District of
New York. According to court documents, the Debtor reports between
$1 million and $10 million in debt owed to 1 and 49 creditors. The
petition states funds will be available to unsecured creditors.
A meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. Section 341(a) is slated for
October 10, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. at Office of UST (TELECONFERENCE
ONLY).
About MBMBA LLC
MBMBA LLC is a Single Asset Real Estate debtor (as defined in 11
U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).
MBMBA LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 24-22778) on September 11, 2024. In
the petition filed by Moshe Brander, as managing member, the Debtor
reports estimated assets up to $50,000 and estimated liabilities
between $1 million and $10 million.
Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Sean H. Lane oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by:
H Bruce Bronson, Esq.
BRONSON LAW OFFICES PC
480 Mamaroneck Ave
HarrisonHarrison, NY 10528
Tel: (914) 269-2530
Fax: (888) 908-6906
Email: hbbronson@bronsonlaw.net
MCDANIEL LOGGING: Case Summary & Three Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: McDaniel Logging, LLC
5901 U.S. Hwy. 441 W.
Pearson, GA 31642
Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 25, 2024
Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
Southern District of Georgia
Case No.: 24-50464
Judge: Hon. Michele J Kim
Debtor's Counsel: William O. Woodall, Jr., Esq.
WOODALL & WOODALL
1003 N. Patterson St.
Valdosta, GA 31601
Tel: (229) 247-1211
Fax: (229) 247-1636
Total Assets: $718,973
Total Liabilities: $1,027,943
The petition was signed by Michael Glenn McDaniel as authorized
representative of the Debtor.
A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's three unsecured creditors is available for
free at PacerMonitor.com at:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/6AZ5VJQ/McDaniel_Logging_LLC__gasbke-24-50464__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA
MIDWEST CHRISTIAN: Gets Interim OK to Obtain $3M DIP Loan
---------------------------------------------------------
Midwest Christian Villages, Inc. received interim approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri to
obtain financing from UMB Bank, N.A. and use the lender's cash
collateral.
In the Sept. 22 order penned by Judge Kathy Surratt-States, the
bankruptcy judge reaffirmed the findings from prior interim orders,
emphasizing that the debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing was
negotiated in good faith and at arm's length, with no better
financing options available.
The DIP loan amount is $3 million and Midwest and its affiliates
are authorized to continue borrowing under the loan agreement.
Meanwhile, the cash collateral usage and budget were updated to
reflect the current needs of the companies' operations and
restructuring efforts. The budget includes receipts and operating
outflows, with a beginning cash balance of $2.3 million and
projected ending balance of $1.75 million by September 28.
Judge Surratt-States also approved protections for UMB Bank and
other secured creditors, reaffirming their superpriority claims and
liens under the Bankruptcy Code.
About Midwest Christian Villages
Midwest Christian Villages, Inc. operates a mix of independent,
assisted and skilled nursing campuses in 10 locations across the
Midwest, serving over 1,000 residents.
Midwest Christian Villages and its affiliates filed their voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. E.D. Mo. Lead Case No. 24-42473) on July 16, 2024, listing
$1 million to $10 million in assets and $10 million to $50 million
in liabilities. The petitions were signed by Kate Bertram,
chief operating officer.
Judge Kathy Surratt-States oversees the cases.
The Debtors tapped Stephen O'Brien, Esq., at Dentons US, LLP and
Summers Compton Wells, LLC as bankruptcy counsels; B.C. Ziegler and
Company as investment banker; and Plante Moran as auditor and tax
consultant. Kurtzman Carson Consultants, LLC, doing business as
Verita Global, is the claims and noticing agent.
The U.S. Trustee for Region 13 appointed an official committee to
represent unsecured creditors in the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases. The
committee tapped Cullen and Dykman, LLP as general counsel;
Sandberg Phoenix & von Gontard P.C. and Schmidt Basch, LLC as local
counsel; and Province, LLC as financial advisor.
MIDWEST DOUGH: Calzone King Wins TRO in Franchise Dispute
---------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned as CALZONE KING, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. MIDWEST
DOUGH GUYS, LLC, NICKOLAS ROWAN, and CORY ROWAN, Defendants, Case
No. 24-cv-00335-BCB-MDN (D. Neb.), Judge Brian C. Buescher of the
United States District Court for the District of Nebraska granted
Calzone King's motion for temporary restraining order.
In this case, the franchisor of the only national calzone
restaurant franchise seeks an ex parte TRO prohibiting terminated
franchisees from operating a competing business in the same
location as the franchised business in violation of non-compete
provisions of the applicable franchise agreements and from using
the service mark of the franchise.
The Court grants the Motion and issues an Ex Parte TRO, although
more limited in scope than the franchisor requested.
Calzone King is a New York limited liability company with its
principal place of business in New York. Calzone King is the
franchisor of D.P. Dough franchises, which is the only national
calzone restaurant franchise. Calzone King has obtained the
exclusive right from D.P. Dough Franchising, LLC, to license to
franchisees the use of D.P. Dough Franchising's federally
registered service mark "D.P. Dough." Calzone King's business model
includes locating D.P. Dough restaurants near college campuses and
offering late-night food delivery primarily marketed to local
student populations. Calzone King provides its franchisees with
access to The Calzone King System, which Calzone King alleges "is a
unique style of restaurant operation for the sale of food products
and beverages of uniform quality."
Defendants Nickolas Rowan a/k/a Nickolas Seevers and Cory Rowan are
both residents and citizens of the State of Nebraska. Seevers and
Rowan are believed to be the sole members of Defendant Midwest
Dough Guys, LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company with its
principal place of business in Nebraska.
On February 9, 2020, August 10, 2020, and October 28, 2020, Calzone
King entered into Franchise Agreements with Midwest Dough Guys
granting it the right to operate a D.P. Dough restaurant within 1.5
miles of the University of Nebraska in Lincoln, Nebraska, the
Kansas State University in Manhattan, Kansas, and the University of
Nebraska at Kearney, in Kearney, Nebraska, respectively.
Each of the Franchise Agreements required Midwest Dough Guys to pay
Calzone King a minimum weekly royalty of $150 per week (the Minimum
Royalty Payments).
After executing the Franchise Agreements, Midwest Dough Guys
operated D.P. Dough Restaurants at the following locations: 1442 O
Street in Lincoln, Nebraska; 105 West 11th Street in Kearney,
Nebraska; and 1120 Moro Street in Manhattan, Kansas. Calzone King
alleges that the gross sales of products or services between
Calzone King and Midwest Dough Guys covered by the Franchise
Agreements have exceeded $35,000 for the 12 months next preceding
the filing of this lawsuit. Calzone King alleges further that more
than 20% of Midwest Dough Guys' gross sales are intended to be or
are derived from the Franchise Agreements.
Calzone King alleges that breaches of the Franchise Agreements led
it to terminate the Franchise Agreements by a letter dated August
9, 2024. The breaches consisted of Midwest Dough Guys filing a
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Nebraska on August 15, 2023, and after
that petition was dismissed on November 28, 2023, filing a second
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the same court, which was also
dismissed on June 25, 2024. Calzone King alleges that the
bankruptcies demonstrate Midwest Dough Guys' insolvency and
constituted acts of default under the Franchise Agreements. Midwest
Dough Guys have ceased operating their Lincoln, Kearney, and
Manhattan D.P. Dough restaurants, which is an act of abandonment
under the Franchise Agreements.
Calzone King alleges that as a direct and proximate result of
Midwest Dough Guys' breaches, it has suffered and will suffer
damages through the loss of the $150 per week minimum royalty for
the remainder of the term of the Franchise Agreements. Calzone King
alleges that the losses relating to the Lincoln Franchise agreement
are $43,200 ($150 x 288 weeks); the losses relating to the Kearney
Franchise are $50,250 ($150 x 335 weeks); and those relating to the
Manhattan Franchise are $47,100 ($150 x 314 weeks).
Calzone King filed its Verified Complaint in this matter on August
27, 2024, against Seevers, Rowan, and Midwest Dough Guys. Calzone
King asserts both diversity subject-matter jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. Sec. 1332, and federal question subject-matter jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1331. Calzone King asserts three claims for
breach of the three Franchise Agreements. Calzone King's fourth
claim is for unfair competition pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1125(a).
The essence of this claim is the allegation that "Defendants'
unauthorized use in commerce of the D.P. Dough service mark as
alleged herein is likely to deceive consumers as to the origin,
source, sponsorship, or affiliation of Defendants' products, and is
likely to cause consumers to believe, contrary to fact, that
Defendants' products are sold, authorized, endorsed, or sponsored
by Plaintiff, or that Defendants are in some way affiliated with or
sponsored by Plaintiff."
Calzone King seeks a temporary restraining order, preliminary
injunction, and permanent injunction inter alia prohibiting
Defendants from using D.P. Dough's service mark, from conduct in
violation of the Non-Compete Provisions of the Franchise Agreements
and enforcing the terms of the Non-Compete Provisions of the
Franchise Agreement. Calzone King also seeks damages in excess of
$75,000, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and any other
relief the Court deems just and equitable.
On August 27, 2024, Calzone King also filed the Motion for
Temporary Restraining Order now before the Court seeking temporary
restraint of the Defendants consistent with the relief sought in
the Verified Complaint.
The Court says to obtain either a TRO or a preliminary injunction,
"'[a] plaintiff . . . must establish [1] that he is likely to
succeed on the merits, [2] that he is likely to suffer irreparable
harm in the absence of preliminary relief, [3] that the balance of
equities tips in his favor, and [4] that an injunction is in the
public interest.'"
Similarly, the Verified Complaint evidences the risk of irreparable
harm to Calzone King from the Defendants' violations of the
Non-Compete Provisions. Damages to Calzone King's reputation and
goodwill are "not quantifiable," and Calzone King has shown an
injury to its protectible franchise interest that "defies
calculation."
Judge Buescher says, "The Verified Complaint evidences the risk of
irreparable harm to Calzone King from Defendants' violations of the
Non-Compete Provisions." He explains, "Damages to Calzone King's
reputation and goodwill are 'not quantifiable,' and Calzone King
has shown an injury to its protectible franchise interest that
'defies calculation.' . As recognized in The Maids Int'l, 2017 WL
4277146, operating a competing business at the very site of the
former D.P. Dough franchise will harm Calzone King's good will. As
in Right at Home, LLC, 308237, it is evident that Calzone King will
have difficulty recruiting another franchisee for the Lincoln
territory as long as the former franchisee operates a business in
violation of the Non-Compete Provision of the Lincoln Franchise
Agreement using the training, practices, and policies developed and
provided by Calzone King. Calzone King is also likely to suffer
injury to its business reputation and its ability to manage its
franchises if it is perceived as tolerating the Defendants'
conduct. The harms here are not merely speculative, it is more than
likely that the competing business is now serving the same products
to the same customers in Lincoln, meaning that Calzone King has
lost actual customers in the area covered by the Lincoln Franchise
Agreement, and it could irreparably lose market presence in that
area."
On the showings in the Verified Complaint and in the circumstances
presented, the Court concludes that an ex parte TRO on the terms
set out in Sec. II.F. should issue.
The Court concludes that while the TRO will be of short duration,
it could potentially become a much longer-lasting preliminary
injunction warranting a more significant security in the first
place rather than the possibility of an adjustment in the security
later. While the Court has no information at this time about
Defendants' potential financial consequences from shutting down
their business, even for a short time, the Court finds the impact
of wrongfully enjoining or restraining their business would be
significant. This is so, because the restraint would occur at the
beginning of the academic year and at the beginning of the football
season at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln where University
students are Defendants' target customers. Consequently, the Court
will require security in the amount of $15,000 cash or bond for the
TRO to issue.
A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=gs20FL
About Midwest Dough Guys, LLC
Midwest Dough Guys, LLC is an American chain of calzone
restaurants.
The Debtor first filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. D. Neb.
Case No. 23-40756) on August 15, 2023. That case was dismissed
November 28, 2023.
The Debtor again sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Neb. Case No. 24-40406) on April 30,
2024. In the petition signed by Nickolas T. Rowan, authorized
representative, the Debtor disclosed up to $500,000 in assets and
up to $10 million in liabilities.
Judge Thomas L Saladino presided the case.
John A. Lentz, Esq., at Lentz Law, PC, LLO, represented the Debtor
as bankruptcy counsel.
The 2024 case was dismissed on June 25, 2024.
NAVIENT CORP: Has Student Loan Forgiveness Deal With Puerto Rico
----------------------------------------------------------------
Sydney Price of Law360 reports that Navient Corp. has reached an
agreement with Puerto Rico's attorney general to forgive at least
$7.7 million in private student loans after being accused of past
predatory lending to student borrowers and pervasive loan servicing
failures.
About Navient Corp.
Navient Corporation (Nasdaq:NAVI) is an American student loan
servicer based in Wilmington, Delaware. Managing nearly $300
billion in student loans for more than 12 million debtors, the
company was formed in 2014 by the split of Sallie Mae into two
distinct entities: Sallie Mae Bank and Navient.
NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS: Signs $9.5MM Asset Sale Agreement With PRN
-------------------------------------------------------------------
NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. disclosed in a Form 8-K Report filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that the Company,
and PRN Physician Recommended Nutriceuticals, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement, pursuant to which PRN will acquire the Company's eyecare
products sold under the Avenova brand and the related assets, which
will constitute substantially all of the Company's operating
assets. PRN, however, will not purchase any of the Company's other
products and assets, including those that relate to the Company's
wound care, urology or dermatology businesses.
"This transaction allows our stockholders to more fully realize the
value we have created over the past 10 years with the Avenova
brand. We are particularly pleased to place Avenova with PRN, a
well-established eyecare company that shares our commitment to
providing best-in-class products that support ocular health," said
Justin Hall, NovaBay CEO. "I believe we have found an ideal home
for Avenova. We expect the brand to continue to grow and flourish
under PRN's capable leadership and their ability to promote Avenova
through their existing network of more than 5,000 eyecare
professionals. It's gratifying to share that more people are using
Avenova than ever before and with the support, resources and
synergies that PRN can provide, we expect that number to continue
to grow."
Upon consummation of the Asset Sale Transaction as contemplated by
the Purchase Agreement, the Company will sell the Purchased Assets
to PRN and PRN will assume the specified Assumed Liabilities for an
aggregate cash purchase price of (i) $9,500,000, plus or minus (ii)
an amount equal to the difference between the net working capital
amount immediately prior to the Closing and the target working
capital value of $800,000. The Net Working Capital Amount will be
determined by the parties commencing 90 days after the Closing with
such calculation applying accounting principles agreed upon by the
parties. If the Net Working Capital Amount is less than the Target
Working Capital Value, then the amount of such difference shall be
paid to PRN solely from the Escrow Amount, and if the Net Working
Capital Amount is greater than the Target Working Capital Value,
then such greater amount shall be paid by PRN to the Company
subject to a limitation of $500,000. At the Closing, the Company
and PRN will also enter into an escrow agreement, pursuant to which
$500,000 of the Purchase Price will be held in an escrow account
for a period of up to six months following the Closing to satisfy
amounts payable by the Company for any post-Closing Net Working
Capital Amount, or for indemnification claims.
The Purchase Agreement, the Asset Sale Transaction and the other
transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement have been
unanimously approved by the Company's board of directors and the
Asset Sale Transaction must also be approved by the Company's
stockholders, as a condition to the Closing. The Closing is subject
to the satisfaction or waiver of additional customary closing
conditions including:
(i) the parties' representations and warranties being true and
correct, with certain of those representations and warranties being
subject to materiality and Material Adverse Effect qualifications
for purposes of satisfying this condition;
(ii) the parties complying in all material respects with all of
the covenants, agreements and obligations in the Purchase Agreement
and the other transaction documents;
(iii) each party receiving all approvals and authorizations
required under the Purchase Agreement;
(iv) no Material Adverse Effect has occurred and is continuing
with respect to the Company;
(v) the execution and/or delivery of certain related
agreements and closing documents by each party; and
(vi) the absence of any injunction or other legal prohibitions
preventing consummation of the Asset Sale Transaction.
The Company expects to close the Asset Sale Transaction in the
fourth quarter of 2024. Upon completion of the sale of the
Purchased Assets and the Avenova business to PRN, the Company will
have sold substantially all of its revenue generating and operating
assets. As a result, and, the Company plans, subject to the
approval of the Company's stockholders, to pursue an orderly wind
down and dissolution of the Company in accordance with Delaware
law. Accordingly, the Company plans to maintain and distribute the
net proceeds received from the Asset Sale Transaction in accordance
with such Delaware liquidation and dissolution process.
The Purchase Agreement contains customary representations and
warranties provided by each of the Company and PRN to the other
party that include those that relate to corporate organization,
authority, the absence of conflicts, brokers and litigation. The
Purchase Agreement also contains representations and warranties by
the Company to PRN that relate to, among other things, title to the
Purchased Assets, intellectual property matters, tax matters,
regulatory matters, product liability and warranties, inventory,
material contracts, compliance with laws, the sale process and the
receipt of a fairness opinion. Similarly, the Purchase Agreement
contains representations and warranties by PRN to the Company that
relate to, among other things, PRN's debt financing process to fund
the purchase price, its ownership of any Company common stock and
its financial sufficiency and solvency. The representations and
warranties of the Company and PRN in the Purchase Agreement will
generally survive until the 12-month anniversary of the Closing
date, except for certain Fundamental Representations designated to
survive for 60 days after the expiration of the statute of
limitations.
The Purchase Agreement also contains covenants of the parties that
are customary for a transaction of this nature, including
covenants:
(i) concerning the Company's business conduct in the ordinary
course prior to the Closing;
(ii) prohibiting the Company and its representatives from
soliciting, initiating or knowingly inducing, encouraging or
facilitating any competing acquisition proposal, subject to certain
limited exceptions in line with the Board's fiduciary duties;
(iii) allowing PRN to access the Company's information with
respect to the Purchased Assets and the Avenova business;
(iv) providing for PRN to secure debt financing on terms and
conditions that are commercially reasonable to fund the Purchase
Price; and
(v) extending offers of employment to those employees of the
Company who will be transferred to PRN upon the Closing. Pursuant
to the Purchase Agreement, the Board also agreed to recommend to
the Company's stockholders that they approve the Asset Sale
Transaction at a special meeting of stockholders; however, the
Board in certain limited circumstances may change its
recommendation in response to a Qualifying Acquisition Proposal
that constitutes a Superior Proposal. Additionally, the Company and
PRN have agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to satisfy
the closing conditions to the Purchase Agreement.
The Company and PRN have each agreed to indemnify the other party
against certain losses due to breaches of their respective
representations, warranties and covenants contained in the Purchase
Agreement. In addition, the Company is indemnifying PRN for losses
from the Excluded Assets (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) and
the Excluded Liabilities. PRN is also indemnifying the Company for
losses with respect to Assumed Liabilities. The indemnification
provided by each of the Company and PRN for breaches of
representations and warranties are subject to customary deductibles
and caps and exceptions to such deductibles and caps, including in
the case of fraud. Each party's indemnification obligations for
losses to each other for breaches of representations and warrants
and covenants is further subject to a limitation of the amount of
the Purchase Price.
The Purchase Agreement contains certain customary termination
rights in favor of each of the Company and PRN. Subject to
specified qualifications and exceptions, either the Company or PRN
may terminate the Purchase Agreement (i) if the Closing has not
occurred by December 31, 2024, (ii) if a court or other
governmental authority restrains, enjoins, prohibits or otherwise
makes illegal the consummation of the Asset Sale Transaction, (iii)
if the Company does not receive Stockholder Approval for the Asset
Sale Transaction, or (iv) if any of the representations and
warranties of the other party become untrue or inaccurate or the
Company breaches its covenants under the Purchase Agreement. PRN
may also terminate the Purchase Agreement if the Board, prior to
receiving Stockholder Approval, makes an Adverse Recommendation
Change. The Company may also terminate the Purchase Agreement (a)
to allow the Company to enter into a definitive agreement for a
competing acquisition proposal that constitutes a Superior Proposal
(as defined in the Purchase Agreement) and (b) if all conditions
under the Purchase Agreement have been satisfied and PRN does not
complete the Closing. PRN will be entitled to receive a termination
fee of $500,000 under specified circumstances that include (A)
termination of the Purchase Agreement by the Company to enter into
a definitive agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal, (B)
when the Company has effected an Adverse Recommendation Change or
(C) if there is an Acquisition Proposal (as defined in the Purchase
Agreement) and after the Purchase Agreement is terminated for
specified reasons and then the Company consummates an Acquisition
Proposal within twelve (12) months of termination. The Company will
also be entitled to a termination fee of $500,000 if the Closing
conditions in the Purchase Agreement have been satisfied and, after
the Company provides PRN with written notice that it is ready to
proceed with the Closing, PRN does not complete the Closing,
including if PRN has not secured the Financing.
The Company will prepare and file a proxy statement with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission and, in line with the Board's
fiduciary duties and evaluation of available information to act in
the best interests of the stockholders, the Board will recommend
that the Asset Sale Transaction be approved by the Company's
stockholders at a special meeting of the Company's stockholders.
In connection with the approval of the Purchase Agreement, the
Asset Sale Transaction, and the other transactions contemplated by
the Purchase Agreement, the Board, upon analysis of the best way to
provide a return of the significant intrinsic value of the Avenova
business to the Company's stockholders if the Asset Sale
Transaction is completed and after considering other factors,
including the remaining assets of the Company after the Avenova
business is sold, approved the voluntary liquidation and
dissolution of the Company and adopted a Plan of Complete
Liquidation and Dissolution of the Company, subject to the Purchase
Agreement being entered into and effective and stockholder approval
being received at a special meeting of stockholders. The Board's
approval of the Plan of Dissolution became effective upon the
signing of Asset Purchase Agreement on September 19, 2024. If the
stockholders approve the Dissolution pursuant to the Plan of
Dissolution, the Company currently plans to file a Certificate of
Dissolution with the Secretary of State of Delaware and proceed
with the Dissolution in accordance with the Plan of Dissolution and
Delaware law as soon as practical following the special meeting and
the Closing of the Asset Sale Transaction; however, such filing may
be delayed or not filed at all as determined by the Board in its
sole discretion.
If the Asset Sale Transaction is consummated, the Company will
receive consideration at Closing of $9,000,000, as adjusted (upward
or downward) for the post-Closing net working capital adjustment,
less transaction expenses, with an additional $500,000 to be held
in escrow for a period of six months after the Closing. In general
terms, if the Company dissolves pursuant to the Plan of
Dissolution, the Company will cease conducting its business, wind
up its affairs, dispose of its non-cash assets, pay or otherwise
provide for its obligations, and distribute its remaining assets,
if any, during a post-dissolution period. Pursuant to the statutory
process, the distribution of the Company's assets will likely take
a minimum of nine months, as required by the Delaware courts and
Delaware law. With respect to the Dissolution, the Company will
follow the dissolution and winding up procedures prescribed by the
Delaware court under Delaware law.
Through the liquidation and dissolution process, the Company
intends, to the fullest extent possible, to pay its creditors and
discharge its liabilities, as well as return as much value that may
remain to stockholders and other stakeholders, including unsecured
convertible note holders, and warrant holders, consistent with the
stockholder approved Plan of Dissolution. Assuming the Asset Sale
Transaction closes, and the Dissolution of the Company proceeds in
accordance with the stockholder approved Plan of Dissolution and
Delaware law, then the Company plans to update its stockholders,
debt holders, warrant holders and preferred stockholder with
additional information and written notice as the court supervised
liquidation and dissolution progresses. Any distributions from the
Company will be made to its stockholders according to their
holdings of common stock and preferred stock as of the date the
Company files a Certificate of Dissolution, which due to the
Dissolution, shall also be the date on which the Company closes its
stock transfer books and discontinues recording transfers of its
common stock, except for transfers by will, intestate succession or
operation of law. Accordingly, there will be limited ability to
sell or transfer your Company securities after the Certificate of
Dissolution is filed.
The Purchase Agreement, the Asset Sale Transaction and the
Dissolution are subject to the Company's stockholder approval. The
Company intends to file a proxy statement with the SEC with respect
to a special meeting of the Company's stockholders, at which
meeting the Company's stockholders will be asked to, among other
items, consider and approve the Asset Sale Transaction and the
Dissolution pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution. The Board reserves
the right to abandon the Dissolution and the Plan of Dissolution,
even if approved by the Company's stockholders, if the Board, in
its discretion, determines that the Dissolution or the Plan of
Dissolution is no longer in the best interests of the Company and
its stockholders.
About Novabay
Headquartered in Emeryville, California, NovaBay Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. -- http://www.novabay.com/-- develops and sells
scientifically created and clinically proven eyecare and skincare
products. The Company's leading product, Avenova Antimicrobial Lid
and Lash Solution, or Avenova Spray, is proven in laboratory
testing to have broad antimicrobial properties as it removes
foreign material, including microorganisms and debris, from the
skin around the eye, including the eyelid.
San Francisco, California-based WithumSmith+Brown, PC, the
Company's auditor since 2010, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated March 26, 2024, citing that the
Company has sustained operating losses for the majority of its
corporate history and expects that its 2024 expenses will exceed
its 2024 revenues, as the Company continues to invest in its
commercialization efforts. Additionally, the Company expects to
continue incurring operating losses and negative cash flows until
revenues reach a level sufficient to support ongoing growth and
operations. Accordingly, the Company has determined that its
planned operations raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.
Novabay reported a net loss of $9.64 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2023, compared to a net loss of $10.61 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2022.
OCEAN POWER: Reveals First Quarter Fiscal 2025 Results
------------------------------------------------------
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. announced financial results for its
fiscal first quarter ended July 31, 2024, which included year over
year reductions in operating expenses, operating loss, and cash
burn.
Recent Financial and Operational Highlights:
Operating expenses of $4.9 million for Q125 decreased 39% as
compared to operating expenses of $8.1 million for the same period
in the prior year reflecting previously disclosed restructuring and
streamlining activities. Use of cash for operating activities of
$6.1 million for Q125 decreased 23% as compared to operating
expenses of $8.0 million for Q124 reflecting previously disclosed
restructuring and streamlining activities.
* The Company's pipeline at approximately $92 million, as of
July 31, 2024, is the largest in the Company's history, continues
to grow, and reflects an increase in defense and security activity
as well as an expansion of commercial opportunities. This compared
to approximately $85 million for Q124.
* The Company's backlog at July 31, 2024 was 5.3 million, a
71% increase over the backlog of $3.1 million at July 31, 2023,
reflecting our previously announced efforts in Latin America and
the Middle East.
* In September 2024 we announced that we had received a
further contract by the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) in
Monterey, California. This contract, which supports revenue
generation in the near-term, adds to the deployment of OPT's
PowerBuoy® as part of an ongoing initiative to enhance maritime
domain awareness and connectivity in Monterey Bay and demonstrate
the use of PowerBuoys® for multi-domain drone and communication
integration. Building on the success of the previously announced
NPS contract, which included installing AT&T 5G technology on a
PowerBuoy®, this new order focuses on integrating advanced subsea
sensors into a PowerBuoy® equipped with OPT's latest Merrows™
suite for AI capable seamless integration of Maritime Domain
Awareness (MDA) across platforms and utilizing communication
technologies from AT&T for NPS. The PowerBuoy® will provide carbon
free, renewable energy for continuous, autonomous monitoring and
data collection in one of the world's most strategically
significant maritime environments.
* In August 2024 we announced the signing of the latest of
four new reseller agreements targeted at supporting global critical
services. These agreements include opportunities for partnering
with allied nations in areas like the South China Sea, previously
announced efforts in Latin America and the Middle East and serving
global commercial markets. These partnerships provide leverage to
proactively serve the demand for our autonomous maritime
technologies in geographies remote from OPT. We believe these
partnerships will diversify our geographical market and further
accelerate our growth and drive new revenue streams.
* In August 2024 we announced a patent pending for our docking
and recharging buoy technology, specifically designed for the
WAM-V. This advanced system has already been successfully
demonstrated, showcasing its potential to revolutionize the
operational efficiency and endurance of autonomous surface vessels.
This development aligns with our broader strategy to enhance the
functionality and versatility of our Merrows™ Platform bringing
artificial intelligence capable solutions to the ocean, thereby
expanding our market reach, and supporting a greater range of
customer needs.
* In July 2024 we announced the signing of a reseller
agreement with Geos Telecom, a prominent provider of maritime
communication and navigation solutions in Costa Rica. This
partnership marks a significant expansion of our presence in the
Latin American market. We believe this agreement not only enhances
our footprint in Latin America but also enables us to deliver
advanced USV capabilities to a new customer base.
* In July we announced we had been awarded a contract for
immediate delivery of a PowerBuoy equipped with Merrows™ in the
Midde East. We had previously announced our selection as a
preferred supplier for our Merrows™ equipped buoys in the region.
We believe this order for a solar and wind powered system
highlights our ability to provide carbon free, renewable Merrows™
platforms in most all marine environments across the globe.
Offering field tested technology solutions as complementary
building blocks makes it possible for our customers to integrate
WAM-Vs and PowerBuoys into their operations and to put configurable
ocean intelligence into their hands.
* In July 2024 we announced the signing of a reseller
agreement with Survey Equipment Services, Inc. ("SES"), a
specialist in the supply of Marine Survey and Navigation equipment.
The agreement focuses on the provision of WAM-Vs, in the USA. This
agreement allows us to leverage SES's offering of survey and
navigation equipment and deploy WAM-Vs to SES's customer base. This
partnership serves to further accelerates our growth and enables
additional revenue stream.
* In July 2024 we announced a partnership with Unique Group
("Unique"), a UAE headquartered global innovator in subsea
technologies and engineering, offering multiple products and
services to customers in a range of industry sectors. Unique has
more than 600 employees and 20 operational bases around the world.
Unique Group will collaborate to deploy our WAM-V in the UAE and
other countries in the Gulf Collaboration Council ("GCC") region.
Integrating our commercially available vehicles with Unique's
leading position in the offshore energy industry in the UAE will
accelerate the adoption of USVs in the region. Working with Unique
Group will further facilitate our efforts to deploy USVs globally.
* In June 2024 we announced the signing of an OEM agreement
with Teledyne Marine, a division of Teledyne Technologies Inc.
(NYSE: TDY) ("Teledyne"), a key supplier in maritime technologies
inclusive of connectors, instruments, and vehicles. This strategic
partnership aims to enhance our product offerings and drive
innovation within the industry providing customers with a turnkey
system. This agreement allows us to leverage Teledyne's
best-in-class offerings to deliver superior sensor and ocean
technology products to our customers. We believe this partnership
will accelerate our growth and enable additional revenue streams.
* In June 2024 we announced we had launched our Global 24/7
Service Support ("Services"). We were already servicing its
Artificial Intelligence Capable Maritime Domain Awareness Solution,
Merrows™, in regions such as Latin America and Sub-Saharan
Africa. The new Services offering gives customers the opportunity
for 24/7 support with tiered options to maintain operations around
the globe. This new Services offering enables our customers to
choose from a menu of options and determine the most cost-effective
way to operate our PowerBuoys and USVs. It also positions us to add
additional recurring revenues to our ongoing growth.
Recent Technological Advancements:
* In September 2024 we announced that we completed more than
four months of offshore testing of our Next Generation PowerBuoy®
("PB") in the Atlantic Ocean off New Jersey. The solar and wind
power equipped Next Generation PB was equipped with OPT's
proprietary Artificial Intelligence capable Merrows™ suite of
solutions. The system maintained 100% data uptime and the state of
charge of the batteries remained over 90% throughout the
deployment. During the deployment, several Intelligence,
Surveillance, and Reconnaissance demonstrations for potential
customers were completed.
* In May 2024 the Company announced it was approaching 15MWh
of renewable energy production from its family of PB. The recent
launch of its Next Generation PB off the coast of New Jersey has
materially accelerated average energy production by combining
solar, wind, and wave energy production capabilities. The energy
generation numbers are based on deployments in the Atlantic,
Pacific, Mediterranean, and North Sea. OPT has demonstrated and
delivered use cases as a proven solution for Anti-Submarine
Warfare, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance, USV
Charging, and Environmental Sensing. These numbers show that
non-grid connected marine energy production is not just for the R&D
community but is a commercially available solution.
Management Commentary – Philipp Stratmann, OPT's President and
Chief Executive Officer
"We continue to make progress on our path towards profitability as
evidenced by the continued growth in our pipeline, backlog,
revenues, and gross margin. We have also made significant progress
in stemming our losses, as evidenced by a material decrease in our
operating costs. The previously announced substantial cessation of
our R&D efforts and the realignment of our headcount to focus on
execution has led to a reduction in payroll and engineering related
expenditures, and we will continue to see further benefits of these
efforts going forward. Our efforts to increase our backlog and
pipeline in the defense and national security industry are paying
off. Our recent contract wins with large government prime
contractors enable us to provide autonomous vehicles and renewable
energy buoys to various U.S. Government Agencies. In addition to
these contract wins, we continue to deliver for our commercial
customers, especially in the field of autonomous survey operations,
enabling them to lower costs and carbon emissions. Additionally,
our geographic footprint continues to expand, and we are seeing
significant opportunities for growth in Latin America and the
Middle East. Lastly, we continue to explore opportunities that will
accelerate shareholder value generation, for example through
resellers and partnerships in overseas locations, as we execute on
our stated strategy, including cost optimization, accelerated
revenue growth, partnerships, or other mechanisms."
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS – Q125
Income Statement:
* Revenues for Q125 were $1.3 million, consistent with revenue
recognized for Q124. Beginning in Q225, we expect higher levels of
revenues and contributed backlog and bookings growth as near-term
opportunities are realized. Trailing twelve-month revenue at July
31, 2024 was $5.6 million, a 70% increase over the trailing
twelve-month revenue of $3.3 million at July 31, 2023.
* Gross profit and margin for Q125 was $0.5 million and 34%,
respectively, as compared to $0.7 million and 52%, respectively,
for Q124 reflecting an increase in lower margin pass through
revenue for Q125.
* Operating expenses were $4.9 million in Q125, down from $8.1
million in Q124 and reflecting previously disclosed restructuring
and streamlining activities.
* Net loss was $4.5 million for Q125, as compared to a net
loss of $7.0 million for Q124. The year-over-year decrease in net
loss was primarily driven by the decrease in operating expenses
noted above.
Balance Sheet and Cash Flow:
* Combined cash, restricted cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments as of July 31, 2024, was $3.3 million,
consistent with the yearend balance at April 30th, 2024.
* Bank debt remained at $0 as of July 31, 2024.
* Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months
ended Q125 was $6.1 million, compared to $8.0 million for the same
period in the prior year. This reflects the decrease in operating
expenses noted above, partially offset by the payment of the
earnout related to our autonomous vehicles business due to the
business exceeding expectations, investment in inventory to satisfy
growing backlog, and payment of employment bonuses that were
accrued during fiscal year 2024.
About Ocean Power Technologies
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. --
https://oceanpowertechnologies.com/ -- provides intelligent
maritime solutions and services that enable safer, cleaner, and
more productive ocean operations for the defense and security, oil
and gas, science and research, and offshore wind markets. The
Company's PowerBuoy platforms provide clean and reliable electric
power and real-time data communications for remote maritime and
subsea applications. The Company also offers WAM-V autonomous
surface vessels (ASVs) and marine robotics services. The Company's
headquarters is located in Monroe Township, New Jersey, with an
additional office in Richmond, California.
Iselin, New Jersey-based EisnerAmper LLP, the Company's auditor
since 2020, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated July 25, 2024, citing that the Company has recurring net
losses and net cash flow used in operations that raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
ONBE INC: S&P Withdraws 'B' Issuer Credit Rating
------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew all of its ratings on Onbe Inc.,
including the 'B' issuer credit and issue-level ratings and '3'
recovery rating, at the issuer's request.
The company requested the withdrawal after it completed a
refinancing and repaid its rated debt. The outlook was stable at
the time of the withdrawal.
OPGEN INC: TG Investment Holds 6.3% Equity Stake
------------------------------------------------
TG Investment Ltd. disclosed in Schedule 13G Report filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that on August 23, 2024, it
purchased 263,961 shares of Opgen Inc. Series E Convertible
Preferred. On August 27, 2024, the TG Investment converted the
Preferred Stock into 633,506 shares of Opgen Inc. Common Stock
representing 6.3% of the shares outstanding based on 10,068,111
shares of Common Stock outstanding as of September 19, 2024, as
provided by OpGen's Transfer Agent.
A full-text copy of the TG Investment's SEC Report is available
at:
https://tinyurl.com/bddmetfr
About OpGen
OpGen, Inc. (Rockville, Md., U.S.A.) -- www.opgen.com -- is a
precision medicine company harnessing the power of molecular
diagnostics and bioinformatics to help combat infectious disease.
The Company distributes molecular microbiology solutions that help
guide clinicians with more rapid and actionable information about
life-threatening infections to improve patient outcomes and
decrease the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant
microorganisms, or MDROs.
West Palm Beach, Florida-based Beckles & Co., Inc., the Company's
auditor since 2024, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated June 3, 2024, citing that the Company has incurred
recurring losses from operations since inception and has stated
that substantial doubt exists about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.
For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, OpGen had net
losses of $32.7 million and $37.3 million, respectively. As of June
30, 2024, Opgen had $2.87 million in total assets, $14.54 million
in total liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $11.67
million.
PACIFIC LUTHERAN: S&P Affirms 'BB' Long-Term Rating on 2014 Bonds
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook to stable from negative and
affirmed its 'BB' long-term rating on Washington Higher Education
Facilities Authority's series 2014 bonds, issued for Pacific
Lutheran University (PLU).
"The stable outlook reflects our view of the university's improved
demand and momentum toward negotiating a favorable forbearance
agreement and revised covenant requirements," said S&P Global
Ratings credit analyst Megan Kearns.
S&P said, "We assessed PLU's enterprise risk profile as adequate,
characterized by good retention and graduation rates, solid faculty
quality, and stabilized enrollment following several years of
declines. We assessed PLU's financial risk profile as vulnerable,
with recent large deficits and a high degree of contingent
liability risk given the university's current levels of
unrestricted resources. We believe that, combined, these credit
factors lead to an anchor of 'bb' and a final rating of 'BB'.
"We could consider a negative rating action if large operating
deficits persist, resulting in additional violations of bond
covenants or a material decline in resources. We could also
consider a negative rating action if the university fails to
finalize a forbearance agreement, though we believe that is
unlikely.
"We could consider a positive rating change if the university
finalizes its forbearance agreement and lowers its risk of debt
acceleration while generating consistent operating margins closer
to breakeven. We would also expect the university to maintain at
least stable enrollment and to maintain financial resource
ratios."
As of May 31, 2023, PLU had approximately $64.6 million of debt
outstanding, including $40.6 million of series 2016 direct-purchase
debt, $10.0 million of series 2014 fixed-rate debt, $8.5 million
associated with a commercial mortgage, $5.0 million from a line of
credit draw, and $590,000 of operating leases.
PATHS PROGRAM: Hires Guidant Law PLC as Bankruptcy Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Paths Program, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Arizona to employ Guidant Law, PLC as
bankruptcy counsel.
The firm will advise and assist the Debtor with respect to its
Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Attorneys $375 to $490 per hour
Paralegals $125 to $175 per hour
Paralegal Assistant $80 to $125 per hour
The Debtor will pay the firm a fee deposit of $7,000.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
D. Lamar Hawkins, Esq., an attorney at Guidant Law, disclosed in a
court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached through:
D. Lamar Hawkins, Esq.
JoAnn Falgout, Esq.
Karen Bentley, Esq.
Guidant Law, PLC
402 E. Southern Ave.
Tempe, AZ 85282
Tel: (602) 888-9229
Fax: (480) 725-0087
Email: lamar@guidant.law
joann.falgout@guidant.law
karen.bentley@guidant.law
About Paths Program, LLC
Paths Program, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
D. Ariz. Case No. 24-07580) on Sept. 11, 2024, disclosing under $1
million in both assets and liabilities. The Debtor is represented
by GUIDANT LAW, PLC.
PAUL FELLER: Ex-Biz Partner Wins $6,750,000 Award
-------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson of the United States District
Court for the Central District of California issued Amended
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 52(a) in the case captioned as PAUL FELLER, et al.,
Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT PETTY, et al., Defendants AND RELATED
COUNTERCLAIMS, Case No. 18-cv-03460-KS (C.D. Calif.).
Plaintiff Paul Feller is an individual who resides in Santa Barbara
County, California.
Plaintiff Cronus Equity, LLC is a Delaware limited liability
company doing business in Santa Barbara County. It is a consulting
company founded and operated by Mr. Feller.
Robert Petty immigrated to the United States from Australia. In
2009, Mr. Petty founded Sky Digital Media Inc. He was the founder,
director and shareholder of Sky.
Mr. Petty met Mr. Feller in or around January 2015. Sky entered
into a consulting agreement with Mr. Feller, whereby he was to be
chairperson and CEO of Sky.
In October 2015, Mr. Petty founded VOS Digital Group, Inc. As sole
shareholder of VOS, Mr. Petty owned 8,500,000 shares of common
stock and 2 million shares of preferred stock in VOS.
In October 2015, Mr. Petty, as sole director of VOS, appointed Mr.
Feller to the Board of Directors to help raise capital. The VOS
Board of Directors authorized 4,250,000 shares of common stock and
1 million shares of preferred stock to be issued to Cronus Equity.
Mr. Feller testified that, despite the 50/50 agreement, Mr. Petty
had no ownership share in VOS because no shares were issued to Mr.
Petty by the board of directors.
Mr. Feller maintains that between October 2015 and December 2,
2015, VOS had no shareholders.
In 2015-2017, Mr. Feller was a VOS director and full time CEO of
Sky Digital Media.
In February 2016, Mr. Feller filed for personal bankruptcy. In
2017, Mr. Feller resigned as CEO of Sky and resigned from the Sky
Board of directors in February or March 2018. In 2019, Mr.
Feller's bankruptcy was converted from Chapter 11 to 7.
The Private Placement Memorandum for the 2016 VOS capital raise
listed the offering price for VOS Digital shares as $1.00 per
share. The PPM for the VOS share offering lists Mr. Petty or
appointees as the owner of 4,250,00 shares and as owner of 1
million shares of preferred stock on August 2, 2016.
The value of the shares owned by Cronus at the time of Mr. Feller's
bankruptcy was at least $525,000 based on a one dollar per share
offering price. At the time of the VOS capital raise, Mr. Feller
was an equity holder of Cronus and a shareholder of VOS.
The Court finds against Mr. Feller and Cronus on their claims for
defamation; civil extortion; intentional interference with
contractual relations; intentional interference with prospective
economic relations; negligent interference with prospective
economic relations; and for injunctive relief. Plaintiffs shall
recover nothing on these claims.
Based on the totality of the evidence, the Court concludes that
statements Mr. Petty made regarding Mr. Feller's conduct in selling
unauthorized shares of Mr. Petty's VOS shares, that Cronus
improperly held funds specifically contributed to VOS and then
created sham loans from Cronus back to VOS, were not false.
Accordingly, Mr. Petty's statements were not defamatory, the Court
states.
The Court finds the trial evidence did not establish that Mr. Petty
knew his threats to report Mr. Feller's wrongdoing in connection
with VOS funds and the unauthorized sale of Mr. Petty's VOS shares
were false. To the contrary, the Court found credible the evidence
demonstrating that Mr. Petty's concerns were true and his actions
to alert board members and/or investors were appropriate in light
of Mr. Petty's fiduciary obligations. Therefore, Plaintiffs fail on
the first prong of the civil extortion claim. Accordingly, Mr.
Petty is entitled to have judgment entered in his favor on
Plaintiffs' claim for civil extortion.
According to the Court, the evidence at trial established that Mr.
Petty, as founder of VOS and the larger shareholder at Sky, trusted
and authorized counter defendants -- Mr. Feller, acting through his
own company, Cronus -- to serve as Mr. Petty's agent in the sale of
1 million shares of VOS common stock. The uncontested evidence at
trial established that Mr. Feller and Mr. Petty were to be equal,
50-50, partners in VOS.
Mr. Feller owed a fiduciary duty to Mr. Petty as an officer and
director of VOS. Mr. Feller, acting individually and/or through
Cronus, breached that duty by making unauthorized sales of 2.5
million shares of Mr. Petty's VOS stock when Mr. Petty only
authorized the sale of 1 million shares.
The Court finds credible the evidence presented at trial that Mr.
Petty only signed two stock transfer agreements for the sale of 1
million of his VOS shares and that the signatures purporting to be
Mr. Petty's signature on the stock transfer agreements for the sale
of an additional 1.5 million shares of Mr. Petty's VOS stock were
fraudulent. Mr. Petty was damaged by Mr. Feller's breach of
fiduciary duty.
Mr. Petty's damages as a result of Mr. Feller's breach of fiduciary
duty include: (1) the monetary value of the loss of 1.5 million VOS
common shares, which, if valued at $1/share would be valued at $1.5
million; and (2) the economic value of Mr. Petty's loss of control
of the company he founded.
The Court concludes Mr. Petty has established by a preponderance of
the evidence that Mr. Feller is liable for breach of fiduciary
duty. Accordingly, judgment should be entered in Mr. Petty's favor
on his counterclaim for breach of fiduciary duty and the Court
awards total damages in the amount of $1.5 million.
As to Mr. Petty's counterclaims, the Court finds Mr. Feller and
Cronus, as counter defendants, liable on Mr. Petty's counterclaims
for breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, fraud and deceit,
negligent misrepresentation, securities fraud, and breach of
contract. The Court finds against Mr. Petty as counter claimants on
the counterclaim for fraudulent transfer. The Court awards total
compensatory damages of $6,750,000 against the counter defendants
for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud and deceit, conversion,
negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract.
Further, the Court finds that counterclaimant's claims for an
accounting, securities fraud, and the request to recover litigation
costs as an element of compensatory damages, all fail as a matter
of law. The Court declines to award punitive damages.
A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=0Q726d
Paul Herbert Feller filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-11313) on July 12, 2016, listing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The Debtor was
represented by Reed H Olmstead, Esq. -- reed@olmstead.law -- at
Hurlbett & Olmstead.
The case was converted to Chapter 7 in 2019.
PAVMED INC: Director Sundeep Agrawal Holds 12,195 Common Shares
---------------------------------------------------------------
Sundeep Agrawal, a director at PAVmed Inc., filed a Form 3 Report
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, disclosing direct
beneficial ownership of 12,195 shares of the company's common
stock.
A full-text copy of Mr. Agrawal's SEC Report is available at:
https://tinyurl.com/26t7h5uf
Abut PAVmed
PAVmed Inc. is a diversified commercial-stage medical technology
company operating in the medical device, diagnostics, and digital
health sectors. Its subsidiary, Lucid Diagnostics Inc. (NASDAQ:
LUCD), is a commercial-stage cancer prevention medical diagnostics
company that markets the EsoGuard Esophageal DNA Test and EsoCheck
Esophageal Cell Collection Device -- the first and only commercial
tools for widespread early detection of esophageal precancer to
mitigate the risks of esophageal cancer deaths. Its other
subsidiary, Veris Health Inc., is a digital health company focused
on enhanced personalized cancer care through remote patient
monitoring using implantable biologic sensors with wireless
communication along with a custom suite of connected external
devices. Veris is concurrently developing an implantable
physiological monitor, designed to be implanted alongside a
chemotherapy port, which will interface with the Veris Cancer Care
Platform.
New York, NY-based Marcum LLP, the Company's auditor since 2019,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated March
25, 2024, citing that the Company has a significant working capital
deficiency, has incurred significant losses, and needs to raise
additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its
operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
As of June 30, 2024, PAVmed had $39.41 million in total assets,
$58.06 million in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $18.64 million.
PENCEL INC: Starts Subchapter V Bankruptcy Proceeding
-----------------------------------------------------
Pencel Inc. filed Chapter 11 protection in the District of
Columbia. According to court documents, the Debtor reports between
$500,000 and $1 million in debt owed to 1 and 49 creditors. The
petition states funds will be available to unsecured creditors.
About Pencel Inc.
Pencil Inc. operates as a non-profit organization. The Organization
focuses on bringing together business professionals, educators, and
public school students through in-school partnerships, mentoring,
internships, and immersive experiences. Pencil serves communities
in the State of New York.
Pencel Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Col. Case No. 24-00309) on September 4, 2024. In
the petition filed by Dr. Cheryl Y. Lee-Butler, as governor, the
Debtor reports estimated assets between $1 million and $10 million
and estimated liabilities between $500,000 and $1 million.
The Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Elizabeth L. Gunn oversees the
case.
The Debtor is represented by:
Anu KMT, Esq.
KEMET HUNT LAW GROUP
7845 Belle Point Dr
Greenbelt, MD 20770
Tel: (301) 982-0888
E-mail: akemet@kemethhuntlaw.com
POST HOLDINGS: S&P Rates New $500MM Senior Unsecured Notes 'B+'
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B+' issue-level rating and '4'
recovery rating to Post Holdings Inc.'s proposed $500 million
senior unsecured notes due 2034. The '4' recovery rating indicates
its expectation for average (30%-50%; rounded estimate: 45%)
recovery in the event of a payment default. The company will use
the proceeds from these notes to redeem its $465 million of
outstanding 5.625% senior notes due 2028 on or after Dec. 1, 2024,
as well as to pay related fees and premiums. S&P expects this will
be a net-leverage-neutral transaction.
S&P said, "Post's operating performance through its third quarter
ended June 30, 2024, was in line with our expectations. We estimate
that the company will end fiscal year 2024 with leverage of between
4.5x and 5.0x. We expect that Post's leverage will remain below our
6.5x downgrade threshold for the current rating despite its
continued appetite for acquisitions, which will likely cause its
leverage to rise to 5x or above over the next few years."
ISSUE RATINGS--RECOVERY ANALYSIS
Key analytical factors
-- Post is the issuer of all of the company's debt. Following this
transaction, Post's debt structure will comprise a $1 billion
revolving credit facility due 2029; $575 million 2.5% convertible
notes due 2027; $1.25 billion 5.5% senior unsecured notes due 2029
($1.24 billion outstanding); $1.65 billion 4.625% senior unsecured
notes due 2030 ($1.4 billion outstanding); $1.8 billion 4.5% senior
unsecured notes due 2031 ($981 million outstanding); $1.0 billion
6.25% senior secured notes due 2032; $1.2 billion senior unsecured
notes due 2033; and $500 million senior unsecured notes due 2034.
-- The senior secured facilities are unconditionally guaranteed by
Post's existing and subsequently acquired direct and indirect
domestic subsidiaries and secured by security interests in
substantially all of its and its subsidiary guarantors' assets,
including certain material real property.
-- The unsecured notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on
a senior unsecured basis by the company's existing and future
domestic subsidiaries. Post's foreign subsidiaries will not
guarantee the notes and account for less than 10% of its sales.
-- Post is incorporated and headquartered in the U.S. In the event
of an insolvency proceeding, S&P anticipates the company would file
for bankruptcy protection under the auspices of the U.S. federal
bankruptcy court system and would be unlikely to involve foreign
jurisdictions.
Simulated default assumptions
-- S&P's simulated default scenario assumes strained liquidity
from weak sales and profitability due to heightened competitive
pressures (combined with higher commodity costs and a shift in
consumer preferences toward other products or a major product
recall). These factors hamper Post's margins and cash flow,
rendering it unable to meet its fixed charges.
-- Year of default: 2028
-- EBITDA at emergence: $711 million
-- Emergence enterprise value multiple: 7x
The emergence-level EBITDA takes into consideration a 20%
operational adjustment (to reflect the recoupment of sales volume
and cost-cutting efforts that improve margins) on top of the
default-level EBITDA. The default EBITDA roughly reflects
fixed-charge requirements of about $418 million in interest costs
(we assume a higher rate because of default and include prepetition
interest) and $175 million in minimal capital expenditure assumed
at default.
Simplified waterfall
-- Gross recovery value: $5 billion
-- Net recovery value for waterfall after administrative expenses
(5%): $4.8 billion
-- Obligor/nonobligor valuation split: 85%/15%
-- Collateral value available to secured debt: $4.5 billion
-- Estimated senior secured claims: $1.9 billion
--Recovery expectations: 90%-100% (rounded estimate: 95%)
-- Remaining value to unsecured claims: $2.8 billion
-- Estimated unsecured debt claims: $6 billion
--Recovery expectations: 30%-50% (rounded estimate: 45%)
Note: All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.
PRIME HARVEST: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended to Nov. 15
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Sarah A. Hall of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Oklahoma extended Prime Harvest, Inc.'s exclusive
period to file a chapter 11 plan of reorganization to November 15,
2024.
In a court filing, the Debtor is the owner of 1765.96 acres located
in Detroit, Texas. This site was selected by Debtor because of a
virtually unlimited supply of fresh cold water which is extremely
valuable to (a) a meat processing plant and (b) a large cold water
fish farm (the "Project").
The Debtor obtained a loan from Legacy Bank to construct the
Project. When the Project was completed, based upon its expected
capacity, it could generate an estimated $30 million in annual net
profits. The Debtor invested approximately $10 million while Legacy
Bank advanced $22 million in loans on the Project. Legacy has a
lien on substantially all of the Debtor's assets.
The Debtor claims that it has been in negotiations with several
lenders and has options to obtain new funding in the amount of
$35,000,000.00 to be used to pay creditors in full and exit
bankruptcy. Additional time is needed to finalize this funding.
Finally, Debtor has been in contact with the North Dallas Municipal
Water District ("NTMWD") about the potential sale of water for use
in the Dallas area by approximately 90 communities. Out of all of
its many potential future water sources, the NTMWD has identified
the Prime Harvest water source as its top priority. The NTMWD has
expressed its intent to enter into a purchase agreement.
The Debtor believes that it will receive sufficient monies from
water sales only to pay all creditors of the estate. Debtor had its
water supply appraised recently by West Water Research, one of the
top water appraisers in North America, for $96.8 to $121.1 million.
The appraisal is confidential, but a copy will be supplied to any
party requesting it. Additional time is needed to finalize water
sales.
Prime Harvest, Inc. is represented by:
Stephen J. Moriarty, Esq.
Fellers, Snider, Blankenship, Bailey & Tippens, PC
100 N. Broadway, Suite 1700
Oklahoma City, OK 73102
Telephone: (405) 232-0621
Facsimile: (405) 232-9659
Email: smoriarty@fellerssnider.com
About Prime Harvest
Prime Harvest, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Okla. Case No. 24-10841) on April 1,
2024. In the petition signed by Calvin Burgess, president, the
Debtor disclosed up to $100 million in assets and up to $50 million
in liabilities.
Stephen J. Moriarty, Esq., at Fellers, Snider, Blankenship, Bailey
& Tippens, PC, serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.
PRIMEX CLINICAL: Files Amendment to Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------------
Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc., submitted a First Amended
Disclosure Statement accompanying First Amended Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization dated August 22, 2024.
The Debtor has continued its business operations in Chapter 11 and
intends to continue to operate its business after Confirmation of
the Plan. The primary objective of the Plan is to effectuate a
financial reorganization of the Debtor by restructuring its debts.
Pursuant to the Plan, the Reorganized Debtor will make
Distributions to Creditors on account of their Allowed Claims in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Plan.
The Plan designates twelve Classes of Claims and one Class of
Interests, which include all Claims against, and Interests in, the
Debtor. These Classes take into account the differing nature and
priority under the Bankruptcy Code of the various Classes and
Interests.
The Amended Disclosure Statement does not alter the proposed
treatment for unsecured creditors and the equity holder:
* Class 10 consists of all Allowed General Unsecured Claims.
Class 10 is impaired by the Plan. Each holder of an Allowed Class
10 Claim will receive, in full and complete satisfaction, exchange
and release of its Allowed Class 10 Claim, Pro Rata Distributions
of any Class 10 Available Funds available for distribution to
holders of Allowed Class 10 Claims, payable pursuant to the
provisions of the Plan. Distributions will be made to the holders
of Allowed Class 10 Claims solely from any Class 10 Available
Funds.
-- The Reorganized Debtor's obligations under the Plan to
holders of Allowed Class 10 Claims will cease, and will be deemed
to be fully and completely satisfied, extinguished and discharged,
upon the third-year anniversary of the Effective Date regardless of
the amount of Distributions made on account of Allowed Class 10
Claims; provided, however, that if the Reorganized Debtor has not
paid to holders of Allowed Class 10 Claims Distributions totaling
at least 10% of such Claims by the third-year anniversary of the
Effective Date ("Class 10 Distribution Termination Date"), the
Class 10 Distribution Termination Date will be extended for one (1)
additional year and the Reorganized Debtor will pay to the holders
of Allowed Class 10 Claims on the fourth-year anniversary of the
Effective Date a final Distribution of any amounts to which such
holders will be entitled under the Plan.
* Class 11 is comprised of: (a) each Allowed General Unsecured
Claim in an amount less than $1,000.00; and (b) any Allowed Class
10 Claim in an amount in excess of $1,000.00 which is reduced to
$1,000.00 by a timely election made by the holder thereof. Each
holder of an Allowed Class 11 Claim will be paid, within 15
Business Days after the Effective Date, a one-time Distribution
equal to the lesser of $800.00 or 80% of its Allowed General
Unsecured Claim, without interest, in full and complete
satisfaction, exchange, discharge and release of its Allowed
General Unsecured Claim.
* Class 13 consists of the Interests of the Interest Holders.
Class 13 is not impaired under the Plan. The Interest Holders will
retain, without alteration or modification, all legal, equitable
and contractual rights to which they are entitled pursuant to their
Interests and the Governance Agreements.
The Plan provides that, upon the Effective Date, the Interest
Holders will retain their interests in the Reorganized Debtor. The
Reorganized Debtor will be responsible for operating the
Reorganized Debtor's business. All Distributions to Creditors under
the Plan will be made solely from the Plan Fund established
pursuant to the Plan. The Plan Agent appointed under the Plan will
maintain the Plan Fund Assets, and will make Distributions in
payment of Allowed Claims in accordance with the provisions of the
Plan.
Upon the Effective Date, Mr. Harootoonian, Aida Harootoonian and
Lucy Lazarian-Hartoonian (defined in the Plan, collectively, as the
"Insider Settlors") will pay jointly to the Reorganized Debtor a
payment in the amount of $1,061,775 (defined in the Plan as the
"Insider Settlement Payment"). The Insider Settlement Payment will
be paid to settle and resolve, fully and completely, all Avoidance
Claims that have been and that may be asserted against the Insider
Settlors, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
Insider Settlement Agreement.
The Plan Fund will be funded exclusively by the following: (a) the
Insider Settlement Payment; (b) any Effective Date Available Cash
Payment; (c) any Net Recoveries that the Reorganized Debtor may
obtain from the assertion of any Causes of Action; and (d) any Net
Cash Flow Payments.
All Distributions to be made to Creditors under the Plan will be
funded solely from Plan Fund Assets. Creditors will have no
interest of any nature whatsoever in any other assets or properties
of the Reorganized Debtor.
A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement dated
August 22, 2024 is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=uxX6vZ from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.
The Debtor's Counsel:
Garrick A. Hollander, Esq.
WINTHROP GOLUBOW HOLLANDER, LLP
1301 Dove Street, Suite 500
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Tel: 949-720-4100
Fax: 949-720-4111
E-mail: ghollander@wghlawyers.com
About Primex Clinical Laboratories
Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc., a medical laboratory in Los
Angeles, Calif., filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D.
Calif. Case No. 23-11446) on Oct. 10, 2023. In the petition signed
by its chief executive officer, Oshin Harootoonian, the Debtor
disclosed $1 million to $10 million in assets and $10 million to
$50 million in liabilities.
Judge Martin R. Barash oversees the case.
Craig B. Garner, Esq., at Garner Health Law Corporation serves as
the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.
PROMIENCE HOMES: Sec. 341(a) Meeting of Creditors on October 17
---------------------------------------------------------------
Prominence Homes & Communities LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in
the Northern District of Alabama. According to court documents, the
Debtor reports between $1 million and $10 million in debt owed to 1
and 49 creditors. The petition states funds will be available to
unsecured creditors.
A meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. Section 341(a) is slated for
October 17, 2024 at 2:30 p.m. at Creditor Meeting Room Birmingham.
About Prominence Homes & Communities LLC
Prominence Homes & Communities LLC is part of the residential
building construction industry.
Prominence Homes & Communities LLC sought relief under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 24-02790) on
September 12, 2024. In the petition filed by Misty M. Glass, as
manager, the Debtor reports estimated assets and liabilities
between $10 million and $50 million each.
Honorable Bankruptcy Judge D Sims Crawford handles the case.
The Debtor is represented by:
Stephen P. Leara, Esq.
SPAIN & GILLON, LLC
505 North 20th Street
Suite 1200 The Financial Center
Birmingham, AL 35203
Tel: (205) 328-4100
Fax: (205) 324-8866
Email: sleara@spain-gillon.com
PURDUE PHARMA: Sacklers Settlement Talks Extended to November 2024
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Randles of Bloomberg News reports that Purdue Pharma LP
said its making progress in settlement talks with members of the
Sackler family who own the company and won another extension of a
breathing spell that's shielded the family from civil lawsuits for
years.
Judge Sean Lane said Monday, September 23, 2024, he'd extend
through November 1, 2024 an injunction that has paused suits
against the Sacklers in order to continue facilitating talks with
states, opioid victims and other creditors.
About Purdue Pharma LP
Purdue Pharma L.P. and its subsidiaries --
http://www.purduepharma.com/-- develop and provide prescription
medicines and consumer products that meet the evolving needs of
healthcare professionals, patients, consumers and caregivers.
Purdue's subsidiaries include Adlon Therapeutics L.P., focused on
treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and
related disorders; Avrio Health L.P., a consumer health products
company that champions an improved quality of life for people in
the United States through the reimagining of innovative product
solutions; Imbrium Therapeutics L.P., established to further
advance the emerging portfolio and develop the pipeline in the
areas of CNS, non-opioid pain medicines, and select oncology
through internal research, strategic collaborations and
partnerships; and Greenfield Bioventures L.P., an investment
vehicle focused on value-inflection in early stages of clinical
development.
Opioid makers in the U.S. are facing pressure from a crackdown on
the addictive drug in the wake of the opioid crisis and as state
attorneys general file lawsuits against manufacturers. More than
2,000 states, counties, municipalities and Native American
governments have sued Purdue Pharma and other pharmaceutical
companies for their role in the opioid crisis in the U.S., which
has contributed to the more than 700,000 drug overdose deaths in
the U.S. since 1999.
OxyContin, Purdue Pharma's most prominent pain medication, has been
the target of over 2,600 civil actions pending in various state and
federal courts and other fora across the United States and its
territories.
On Sept. 15 and 16, 2019, Purdue Pharma L.P. and 23 affiliated
debtors each filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
19-23649), after reaching terms of a preliminary agreement for
settling the massive opioid litigation. The Debtors' consolidated
balance sheet as of Aug. 31, 2019, showed $1.972 billion in assets
and $562 million in liabilities.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain oversees the cases.
The Debtors tapped Davis Polk & Wardwell, LLP and Dechert, LLP, as
legal counsels; PJT Partners as investment banker; AlixPartners as
financial advisor; and Grant Thornton, LLP as tax structuring
consultant. Prime Clerk, LLC, is the claims agent.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and Bayard, P.A., represent the
official committee of unsecured creditors appointed in the Debtors'
bankruptcy cases.
David M. Klauder, Esq., is the fee examiner appointed in the
Debtors' cases. The fee examiner is represented by Bielli &
Klauder, LLC.
* * *
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain in early September 2021 approved
a plan to turn Purdue into a new company (Knoa Pharma LLC) no
longer owned by members of the Sackler family, with its profits
going to fight the opioid epidemic. The Sackler family agreed to
pay $4.3 billion over nine years to the states and private
plaintiffs and in exchange for a lifetime legal immunity. The deal
resolves some 3,000 lawsuits filed by state and local governments,
Native American tribes, unions, hospitals and others who claimed
the company's marketing of prescription opioids helped spark and
continue an overdose epidemic.
Separate appeals to approval of the Plan have already been filed by
the U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee, California, Connecticut, the District
of Columbia, Maryland, Rhode Island and Washington state, plus some
Canadian local governments and other Canadian entities.
In early March 2022, Purdue Pharma reached a nationwide settlement
over its role in the opioid crisis, with the Sackler family members
boosting their cash contribution to as much as $6 billion. The
settlement was hammered out with attorneys general from the eight
states -- California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Oregon,
Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington -- and D.C. who had opposed
the previous settlement.
QSR STEEL: Seeks to Extend Plan Filing Deadline to Oct. 16
----------------------------------------------------------
QSR Steel Corporation, LLC, asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Connecticut to extend its period to file a chapter 11
plan of reorganization to October 16, 2024.
The Debtor commenced the instant bankruptcy filing after suffering
a substantial adverse arbitration award in the amount of
$2,291,133.19 in favor of Haynes Construction Company, which award
was confirmed by the Connecticut Superior Court on April 30, 2024,
but which is presently on appeal to the Appellate Court.
The Debtor is seeking protection under Subchapter V of Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code to preserve its assets, which would
otherwise be dismembered by the collection efforts of Haynes, with
the objective of maintaining its operations and the employment of
dozens of workers in the State and ultimately, of successfully
reorganizing.
As part of the plan formulation process, the Debtor is working with
counsel and its financial advisor Marcum to pursue a consensual
plan with its creditors. This will require obtaining the consent of
the Debtor's largest unsecured creditor, Haynes. Haynes requested a
substantial amount of documentation from the Debtor in order to
engage in the plan formulation process.
The Debtor explains that it is short-staffed with only one
bookkeeper and has been trying to provide all documents that
Haynes' counsel has asked for so it can begin discussions on a
consensual plan. While Debtor has provided many of the documents
(including a set of projected financials), the parties have not
been able to commence said discussions.
The Debtor claims that its counsel has been sidetracked in
preparing for and participating in an upcoming hearing in another
matter pending in Connecticut Superior Court. Specifically, the
Debtor's counsel, Pullman & Comley, LLC, is counsel to the chapter
7 trustee of The Gateway Development Group, Inc, Howard P.
Magaliff, in a proceeding that is scheduled for a hearing on an
application for prejudgment remedy that is scheduled to start
evidence on September 10, 2024 and continue until September 18,
2024.
The Debtor asserts that it has been actively involved in pursuing
its reorganization since the Petition Date and Debtor engaged its
largest unsecured creditor and has attempted to comply with its
lengthy list of documentation requests. Debtor is short-staffed
with only one bookkeeper but the Debtor has almost fulfilled
Haynes' requests and the parties will be able to engage in
negotiations.
Moreover, the Debtor's counsel has been distracted with the
Carnicelli Matter that has involved heavy discovery and deposition
practice and a six-day evidentiary hearing in the middle of the
plan formulation period. These items are not attributable to the
Debtor.
QSR Steel Corporation, LLC is represented by:
Irve Goldman, Esq.
Pullman & Comley, LLC
850 Main Street, P.O. Box 7006
Bridgeport, CT 06601-7006
Tel: (203) 330 2000
Fax: (203) 576 8888
Email: igoldman@pullcom.com
kmayhew@pullcom.com
jkaplan@pullcom.com
About QSR Steel Corporation LLC
QSR Steel Corporation, LLC is a one-stop, full service structural
steel company based in Hartford, Conn., offering everything from
steel buildings to stairs and railings.
The Debtor filed Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No.
24-20562) on June 18, 2024, with $2,838,179 in assets as of March
31, 2024 and $2,124,057 in liabilities as of March 31, 2024. Glenn
Salamone, member, signed the petition.
Irve J. Goldman, Esq., at Pullman & Comley, LLC represents the
Debtor as legal counsel.
QUICKWAY ESTATES: Hires Bronson Law Offices P.C. as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Quickway Estates, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York to employ Bronson Law Offices
P.C. as general bankruptcy counsel.
The firm will provide these services:
a. assist in the administration of this Chapter 11 proceeding;
b. prepare or review operating reports;
c. review claims and resolve claims which should be
disallowed;
d. defend lift stay motions;
e. enter into a sale contract and file sale motion; and
f. provide all other services necessary to confirm a plan in
bankruptcy or defend the bankruptcy.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Attorney $525 per hour
Paralegal/ legal assistant $150 to $250 per hour
The firm received retainer payments in the amount of $10,000.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
H. Bruce Bronson, Esq., a partner at Bronson Law Offices P.C.,
disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.
The firm can be reached at:
H. Bruce Bronson, Esq.
Bronson Law Offices P.C.
480 Mamaroneck Ave.
Harrison, NY 10528
Tel: (914) 269-2530
Fax: (888) 908-6906
About Quickway Estates, LLC
The Debtor is engaged in activities related to real estate. The
Debtor owns land and building located at 5 Quickway Road, Monroe,
NY 10950 valued at $3 million.
Quickway Estates LLC in Monsey, NY, filed its voluntary petition
for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 24-22114) on
February 13, 2024, listing $3,000,000 in assets and $2,575,965 in
liabilities. Mitchell Steiman as chief restructuring officer,
signed the petition.
Judge Sean H. Lane oversees the case.
Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP serve as the Debtor's legal counsel.
RAPTOR AUTO: Plan Filing Deadline Extended to Jan. 8, 2025
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jil Mazer-Marino U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of New York extended Raptor Auto Transport Inc.'s period
to file a small business chapter 11 plan of reorganization and
disclosure statement, and obtain acceptance thereof to January 8,
2025 and April 8, 2025, respectively.
As shared by Troubled Company Reporter, the Debtor claims that it
simply needs time to reach an agreement with the Creditors with
respect to adequate protection payments and resolution of their
claims filed in this case, and thereafter to file a plan of
reorganization and disclosure statement, offering treatment to the
main and other remaining Creditors of the estate.
The Debtor explains that the requested extensions of the
exclusivity period to file a plan and disclosure statement will not
harm any economic stakeholder. Rather, the time will be used to
resolve a claim filed in this case.
The Debtor states that it has responded to the exigent demand of
its chapter 11 case and has worked diligently to advance the
reorganization process. The Debtor should be afforded a full, fair
and reasonable opportunity to negotiate, propose, file and solicit
acceptances of its chapter 11 plan.
Raptor Auto Transport Inc. is represented by:
Alla Kachan, Esq.
LAW OFFICES OF ALLA KACHAN, P.C.
2799 Coney Island Avenue., Suite 202
Brooklyn, NY 11235
Telephone: (718) 513-3145
Email: alla@kachanlaw.com
About Raptor Auto Transport Inc
Raptor Auto Transport Inc. filed its voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No.
24-41140) on March 14, 2024, listing up to $50,000 in assets and
$1,000,001 to $10 million in liabilities.
Judge Jil Mazer-Marino presides over the case.
Alla Kachan, Esq., at the Law Offices Of Alla Kachan P.C., is the
Debtor's counsel.
RED CLOAK: Seeks to Hire Calaiaro Valencik as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Red Cloak Wood Designs, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to employ
Calaiaro Valencik as counsel.
The firm will provide these services:
a. preparation of the bankruptcy petition and attendance at
the meeting of creditors;
b. representation of the Debtor in relation to negotiating an
agreement on cash collateral;
c. representation of the Debtor in relation to acceptance or
rejection of executory contracts;
d. provision of advise to the Debtor with regard to its rights
and obligations during the Chapter 11 case;
e. representation of the Debtor in relation to any motions to
convert or dismiss this Chapter 11;
f. representation of the Debtor in relation to any motions for
relief from stay filed by any creditors;
g. preparation of the Chapter 11 Plan;
h. preparation of any objection to claims in the Chapter 11;
and
i. representation of the Debtor in general.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Donald R. Calaiaro, Attorney/Partner $450 per hour
David Z. Valencik, Attorney/Partner $375 per hour
Andrew K. Pratt, Attorney/Partner $325 per hour
Paralegals, Paralegal $100 per hour
The firm received from the Debtor a retainer in the amount of
$3,738.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Donald R. Calaiaro, Esq., disclosed in a court filing that the firm
is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Donald R. Calaiaro, Esq.
938 Penn Avenue, Suite 501
Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3708
Tel: (412) 232-0930
Fax: (412) 232-3858
Email: dcalaiaro@c-vlaw.com
About Red Cloak Wood Designs, Inc.
Red Cloak Wood Designs, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 24-21905-GLT) on August 2, 2024.
The Debtor hires Calaiaro Valencik as counsel.
RENNOVA HEALTH: Revises Stock Exchange Deal With FOXO
-----------------------------------------------------
As previously disclosed, on June 10, 2024, Rennova Health, Inc.
entered into two stock exchange agreements, each with FOXO
Technologies Inc.
The first agreement (the "Myrtle Agreement") provided for the
Company to exchange all of its equity interest in its subsidiary,
Myrtle Recovery Centers, Inc. for $500,000, payable in shares of
FOXO's Class A Common Stock. This transaction closed on June 14,
2024. On June 25, 2024, the parties to the Myrtle Agreement entered
into a Consent and Waiver, pursuant to which FOXO issued 1,023,629
shares of FOXO Common Stock to the Company on July 17, 2024 (which
was the date of approval of the NYSE American, upon which the FOXO
Common Stock is listed). Such shares represented $235,434.67 of the
purchase price. Pursuant to the Consent and Waiver, the remainder
of the purchase price ($264,565.33) is represented by a Note issued
by FOXO to the Company. The Note is due on demand and payable in
cash or, upon receipt of required approval of the issuance under
the rules of the NYSE American, in shares of FOXO Common Stock.
There is no guarantee that such approval will be received.
The second agreement (the "RCHI Agreement") provided for the
Company to exchange all of the outstanding shares of its subsidiary
Rennova Community Health, Inc. for 20,000 shares of a to be
authorized Series A Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred
Stock. Closing of the RCHI Agreement was subject to a number of
conditions. On September 10, 2024, the parties to the RCHI
Agreement entered into an Amended and Restated Securities Exchange
Agreement which revised the consideration payable to the Company
from shares of FOXO Preferred Stock to $100. In addition, RCHI
issued to the Company a senior secured note in the principal amount
of $22,000,000 (subject to adjustment). The RCHI Note matures on
September 10, 2026 and accrues interest on any outstanding
principal amount at the rate of 8% per annum for the first six
months, increasing to 12% per annum thereafter. Upon an event of
default, the interest rate shall increase to 20% per annum. The
RCHI Note requires principal repayments equal to 10% of the free
cash flow (net cash from operations less capital expenditures) from
RCHI and its subsidiary Scott County Community Hospital, Inc. The
RCHI Note will be reduced by payment of 25% of any net proceeds
from sales of equity or assets by FOXO.
The RCHI Note is guaranteed by FOXO and Scott County, pursuant to
the terms of a Guaranty Agreement. The RCHI Note is also secured by
the assets of RCHI and Scott County pursuant to a Security and
Pledge Agreement and by the "Collateral" owned by FOXO as provided
in the Security and Pledge Agreement with FOXO. The Amendment also
provides that the Company may at any time request that FOXO seek
approval of its shareholders of the issuance of FOXO Common Stock
upon conversion in full of the shares of FOXO Series A Preferred
Stock issuable upon exchange of the RCHI Note. At any time after
receipt of such approval, the Company shall have the option to
exchange, in whole or in part, the RCHI Note for shares of FOXO
Series A Preferred Stock. Upon any such exchange, the Company will
receive the equivalent of $1.00 stated value of FOXO Series A
Preferred Stock for each $1.00 of the aggregate of principal and
accrued and unpaid interest, liquidated damages and/or redemption
proceeds (or any other amounts owing under the RCHI Note) being
exchanged.
Also, pursuant to the Amendment, FOXO expanded the size of its
Board of Directors to five, and their Board elected Seamus Lagan
and Trevor Langley to fill the vacancies on September 10, 2024. Mr.
Lagan is the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Rennova and
Mr. Langley is a director of Rennova.
About Rennova Health
Rennova Health, Inc. -- http://www.rennovahealth.com-- is a
provider of health care services. The Company owns one operating
hospital in Oneida, Tennessee known as Big South Fork Medical
Center, a hospital located in Jamestown, Tennessee that it plans to
reopen. In addition, the Company has a strategic investment in
InnovaQor, Inc.
Rennova Health reported a net loss available to common stockholders
of $334.17 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2022, compared to a
net loss available to common stockholders of $500.87 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2021. As of Dec. 31, 2022, the Company had
$20.57 million in total assets, $49.67 million in total
liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $29.09 million.
Salt Lake City, Utah-based Haynie & Company, the Company's auditor
since 2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated April 17, 2023, citing that the Company has recognized
recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations. This
raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.
At Sept. 30, 2023, the Company had a working capital deficit and a
stockholders' deficit of $41.5 million and $27.6 million,
respectively. While the Company had net income of $1.5 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2023, it incurred a net loss of
$0.5 million and $3.3 million for the three months ended Sept. 30,
2023, and the year ended Dec. 31, 2022, respectively. As of Nov.
14, 2023, its cash is deficient, and payments for its operations in
the ordinary course are not being made. The Company said losses in
prior years and other related factors, including past due accounts
payable and payroll taxes, as well as payment defaults under the
terms of outstanding notes payable and debentures, raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern for 12 months from the filing date of this report.
ROCKLIN ACADEMY: S&P Affirms 'BB+' LT Rating on 2021A/B Rev. Bonds
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook to positive from stable and
affirmed its 'BB+' long-term rating on the California Enterprise
Development Authority's series 2021A tax-exempt charter school
revenue bonds and series 2021B taxable charter school revenue bonds
($40 million par), issued for Rocklin Academy (RA). At the same
time, S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB+' long-term rating with a
positive outlook to the authority's series 2024 tax-exempt charter
school revenue bonds issued for RA.
"The outlook revision to positive reflects our opinion of continued
strengthening in Rocklin Academy's financial profile with financial
performance that continues to outperform budgeted expectations, in
addition to improved liquidity," said S&P Global Ratings credit
analyst Amber Schafer.
The series 2024 bonds are being issued to purchase the academy's
Gateway facility, which it currently leases. The series 2024 bonds
are being issued on parity with the academy's series 2021A and
2021B bonds, which were issued to acquire the academy's Western
Sierra Collegiate Academy campus.
RA is a public charter school with four high-performing schools
serving students from pre-kindergarten through 12th grade in Placer
County in Northern California, approximately 23 miles east of
Sacramento. Total enrollment is expected to be generally stable at
over 2,560 in fall 2024.
ROSSWOOD REALTY: Seeks to Hire Ure Law Firm as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
Rosswood Realty LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Central District of California to employ Ure Law Firm as
counsel.
The firm will provide these services:
a. advise the Debtor regarding matters of bankruptcy law and
concerning the requirement of the Bankruptcy Code, and the
Bankruptcy Rules relating to the administration of this case, and
the operation of the Debtor's estate as a debtor in possession;
b. represent the Debtor in proceedings and hearings in the
court involving matters of bankruptcy law;
c. assistance in compliance with the requirements of the
Office of the United States trustee;
d. provide the Debtor legal advices and assistance with
respect to the Debtor's powers and duties in the continued
operation of the Debtor's business and management of property of
the estate;
e. assist the Debtor in the administration of the estate's
assets and liabilities;
f. prepare necessary applications, answers, motions, orders,
reports and/or other legal documents on behalf of the Debtor;
g. assist in the collection of all accounts receivable and
other claims that the Debtor may have and resolve claims against
the Debtor's estate;
h. provide advice, as counsel, concerning the claims of secure
and unsecured creditors, prosecutions, and/or defense of all
actions; and
i. prepare, negotiate, prosecute and attain confirmation of a
plan of reorganization.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Thomas B. Ure $475 per hour
Associates $375 per hour
Law clerks $275 per hour
Paralegals $175 per hour
The firm received a retainer of $5,000 from Farhad Saedi, managing
member of the Debtor.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Thomas B. Ure, Esq., a partner at Ure Law Firm, disclosed in a
court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Thomas B. Ure, Esq.
Ure Law Firm
8280 Florence Avenue, Suite 200
Downey, CA 90240
Telephone: (213) 202-6070
Facsimile: (213) 202-6075
Email: tom@urelawfirm.com
About Rosswood Realty LLC
Rosswood Realty LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 24-16036) on July 30,
2024. In the petition filed by Farhad Saedi, as managing member,
the Debtor estimated assets between $1 million and $10 million and
estimated liabilities between $500,000 and $1 million.
The Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Neil W. Bason oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by:
Thomas B. Ure, Esq.
URE LAW FIRM
8280 Florence Avenue, Suite 200
Downey, CA 90240
Tel: (213) 202-6070
Fax: (213) 202-6075
Email: tom@urelawfirm.com
SAI BABA: Hires Peters Thompson & Christian PA as Accountant
------------------------------------------------------------
Sai Baba Hospitality of NC, LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina to
employ Peters, Thompson & Christian, PA as accountant.
The firm will provide these services:
a. prepare Debtor's tax returns;
b. provide general tax/accounting services; and
c. consult, advise, and review past accounting and tax
returns.
The firm will be paid at a flat fee of $125 per month for payroll
and reporting, $150 per month for general bookkeeping including
sales and occupancy tax reporting, or an hourly rate of $95 to $260
per hour (depending on professional rendering services) for other
work including income tax preparation.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Gary Peters, a partner at Peters, Thompson & Christian, PA,
disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Gary Peters
Peters, Thompson & Christian, PA
328 New Bridge Street
Jacksonville, NC 28540
Tel: (910) 347-2528
Email: gary@ptcpanc.com
About Sai Baba Hospitality of NC
Sai Baba Hospitality of NC LLC owns a hotel located at 2149 N
Marine Blvd., Jacksonville, NC, having an appraised value of $4.3
million.
Sai Baba Hospitality of NC LLC sought relief under Subchapter V of
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. N.C. Case No.
24-02714) on August 14, 2024, In the petition filed by Arti Jethwa,
as general manager, the Debtor reports total assets of $4,300,000
and total liabilities of $1,900,000.
Honorable Bankruptcy Judge David M. Warren oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by:
Benjamin R. Eisner, Esq.
THE LAW OFFICES OF OLIVER & CHEEK, PLLC
PO Box 1548
New Bern, NC 28563
Tel: (252) 633-1930
Fax: (252) 633-1950
Email: ben@olivercheek.com
SAM ASH: Clifford Chance Advises Gonher on Acquisition
------------------------------------------------------
Clifford Chance has advised Mexico-based Gonher Music Center on its
acquisition, through newly formed US affiliates, of storied US
music retailer Sam Ash. The 42-store retail chain filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in May 2024, citing declining
sales as customers shifted to online shopping during the COVID-19
pandemic, and subsequently launched a court-supervised sale process
under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code.
Following a competitive auction in which Gonher Music Center
emerged as the successful bidder, the Bankruptcy Court approved the
sale and affiliates of Gonher Music Center acquired substantially
all the assets of its e-commerce platform and wholesale businesses.
This transaction closed in July 2024.
The cross-practice team advising Gonher was led by partner Brian
Lohan (Restructuring & Insolvency) and senior associate Stephanie
Kilmer (Corporate/M&A). The wider US team included partners
Michelle McGreal and Maja Zerjal Fink (Restructuring & Insolvency),
Kevin Lehpamer (Corporate/M&A), and Violetta Kokolus (Intellectual
Property), along with associates Madelyn Nicolini (Restructuring &
Insolvency) and William Wilcox (Corporate/M&A). Beijing
Corporate/M&A partner Yufei Liao and associate Jiahong Cai and
trainee Ruiqi (Rickey) Yu advised on the Chinese law aspects of the
transaction.
About Sam Ash Music Corp.
Sam Ash Music Corporation operates a chain of musical instrument
retail stores. The Debtor offers guitars, basses, band and
orchestra, drums, keyboards, live sound, recording gear, DJ and
lighting. Sam Ash Music serves customers throughout the United
States.
Sam Ash Music Corp. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 24-14727) on May 9, 2024.
In the petition filed by Jordan Meyers, as chief restructuring
officer, the Debtor said estimated assets are between $100 million
and $500 million and estimated liabilities are between $100 million
and $500 million.
The Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Stacey L. Meisel oversees the case.
The Debtors tapped Cole Schotz P.C. as counsel; SierraConstellation
Partners LLC as financial advisor; and Capstone Capital Markets,
LLC as investment banker.
SCILEX HOLDING: Reaches Agreement With Oramed on Note Payment Terms
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Scilex Holding Company disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission that on Sept. 20, 2024, the
Company and Oramed Pharmaceuticals Inc. entered into a letter
agreement, pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay to Oramed
$2,000,000 on Sept. 23, 2024, which payment shall be applied as
follows: (i) $1,700,000 of such payment shall be applied to the
amortization payment due under the Note on the March 21, 2025 and
(y) $300,000 of such payment to purchase the Purchased Warrants.
Oramed shall transfer the Purchased Warrants to the Company not
later than two business days following the date on which Oramed has
received the Specified September Payment.
As previously disclosed by Scilex, on Sept. 21, 2023, the Company
entered into, and consummated the transactions contemplated by, a
Securities Purchase Agreement with Oramed and the Agent.
Pursuant to the Scilex-Oramed SPA, among other things, on Sept. 21,
2023, the Company issued to Oramed (i) a Senior Secured Promissory
Note in an aggregate amount of $101,875,000, (ii) warrants to
purchase up to an aggregate of 13,000,000 (subject to adjustment)
shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.0001 per share,
with an exercise price of $0.01 per share and restrictions on
exerciseability, including that certain Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock No. ORMP CS-5 (as amended) and (iii) warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 4,000,000 (subject to adjustment as provided therein)
shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $11.50 per share.
Pursuant to the Letter Agreement, the parties agreed that,
notwithstanding the definition of the "Exercise Eligibility Date"
in the CS-5 Warrant, Oramed may immediately exercise the CS-5
Warrant with respect to up to 1,062,500 (subject to adjustment)
shares of Common Stock subject to such warrant at any time after
Sept. 20, 2024.
The parties further agreed, upon receipt of the Specified September
Payment, (i) that notwithstanding the minimum Liquidity
requirements set forth in Section 7(b)(x) of the Note, the Company
and its Subsidiaries shall be required to maintain the following
minimum Liquidity during the specified time periods instead: from
and after Sept. 19, 2024 until the Maturity Date, $0, and (ii) to
extend the due date of the $20,000,000 amortization payment from
Sept. 23, 2024 to Sept. 30, 2024.
About Scilex Holding
Headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., Scilex Holding Company is
focused on acquiring, developing and commercializing non-opioid
pain management products for the treatment of acute and chronic
pain. Scilex targets indications with high unmet needs and large
market opportunities with non-opioid therapies for the treatment of
patients with acute and chronic pain and are dedicated to advancing
and improving patient outcomes. Scilex's commercial products
include: (i) ZTlido (lidocaine topical system) 1.8%, a prescription
lidocaine topical product approved by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration for the relief of neuropathic pain associated with
postherpetic neuralgia, which is a form of post-shingles nerve
pain; (ii) ELYXYB, a potential first-line treatment and the only
FDA-approved, ready-to-use oral solution for the acute treatment of
migraine, with or without aura, in adults; and (iii) Gloperba, the
first and only liquid oral version of the anti-gout medicine
colchicine indicated for the prophylaxis of painful gout flares in
adults, expected to launch in the first half of 2024.
San Diego, California-based Ernst & Young LLP, the Company's
auditor since 2020, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated March 11, 2024, citing that the Company has negative
working capital, has suffered losses from operations, has recurring
negative cash flows from operations, and has stated that
substantial doubt exists about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.
SEARS HOLDINGS: Florida Judge Rules in DSG Sublease Dispute
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned as DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC., Plaintiff, v.
FORBES/COHEN FLORIDA PROPERTIES, L.P., and THE GARDENS VENTURE,
LLC, Defendants, CASE NO. 20-CV-80157-BER (S.D. Fla.), Judge Bruce
E. Reinhart of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Florida issued a supplemental order resolving all of
the legal issues related to the Sears bankruptcy.
Sears filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 15, 2018. It is
undisputed that, at that time, both the Forbes-Sears Sublease and
the DSG Sublease were executory contracts of the debtor.
The Bankruptcy Court approved an asset purchase agreement dated
January 17, 2019 that divided the debtor's assets into two
categories -- acquired assets and excluded assets. Transform Midco
LLC, Transform Propco LLC, and Transform Operating Stores, LLC got
the acquired assets. It is undisputed that the Forbes-Sears
Sublease was one of the acquired assets.
Similarly, Sears' liabilities were divided into assumed liabilities
and excluded liabilities. The debtor retained the excluded
liabilities and the excluded assets.
The assumed liabilities -- which were transferred to Transform --
included "all liabilities arising after the APA "relating to the
payment or performance of obligations with respect to the Assigned
Agreements." "Assigned Agreements" included designatable leases,
such as the Forbes-Sears Sublease.
As part of the process for approving the APA, Transform filed a
Notice of Cure Costs and Potential Assumption and Assignment of
Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases in Connection with Global
Sale Transaction. That document identified the Forbes-Sears
Sublease as an unexpired lease that Transform proposed to assume
and assign.
Forbes objected to the Forbes-Sears lease being assumed and
assigned. While the objection was pending, on February 8, 2019, the
bankruptcy court approved the sale of Sears' assets to Transform.
The bankruptcy court preserved Forbes' objection to the assumption
and assignment of the Forbes-Sears Sublease for later resolution.
Forbes' objection was resolved through a confidential settlement
agreement with an effective date of May 7, 2019. The parties to the
settlement agreement were Forbes as "Landlord" and Transform as
"Buyer." The parties agreed that, upon approval by the bankruptcy
court, the Forbes-Sears Sublease "shall transfer to and be assumed
by the applicable buyer."
On May 13, 2019, the Bankruptcy Court entered an Order (I)
Authorizing Assumption and Assignment of Certain Leases and (II)
Granting Related Relief. The Assignment Order authorized Sears to
assume and assign the Forbes-Sears Sublease to Transform. The
assignment of the Forbes-Sears Sublease is subject to "any
interests, covenants, or rights applicable to such real estate
leases to the extent the same limit or condition the permitted use
of the property such as easements, reciprocal easement agreements,
operating or redevelopment agreements, covenants, licenses, or
permits."
The Fifth Amendment to the DSG Sublease was signed on June 27,
2019. In 2015, as part of the initial DSG Sublease, Sears had given
a Guaranty of Termination Damages and Indemnity. The Fifth
Amendment replaced that guaranty with a guaranty from Transform.
On October 15, 2019, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed Sears' Chapter
11 reorganization plan. As part of that plan, any executory
contract that had not been assumed and assigned was deemed rejected
as of October 29, 2022.
The parties dispute three primary issues relating to the Sears
bankruptcy. First, whether Transform obtained exterior signage
rights that could be sublet to DSG. Second, whether Transform could
form a post-bankruptcy contract with DSG. Third, whether any
damages caused by Defendants' tortious interference ended as a
matter of law under the Sears Reorganization Plan in October 2022.
Transform became a Major under the reciprocal easement agreements
when it assumed the Forbes-Sears Sublease on May 19, 2019.
Therefore, Transform had the right to give DSG external signage
rights as part of the November 2019 Development Application, the
District Court finds.
Judge Reinhart says, "Transform had the right to enforce the REA,
including its right as a Major to have exterior signage. First,
there was an enforceable covenant running with the land. Second,
Transform could enforce the REA because it was an intended
beneficiary of the covenant. Third, Transform was a 'Major' under
the REA. The REA defines a Major as 'Macy, Sears, or Federated and
their respective successors and assigns.' Fourth, the right to have
exterior signs could be given to a Major's sublessee. To summarize,
the REA was a covenant running with the land. Transform had the
right to enforce the REA. The REA gave Majors the right to have
exterior signs. Transform was a Major, so it had the right to have
exterior signs. That right could be sublet to DSG."
The parties dispute whether, as a matter of law, a contract existed
between Transform and DSG in November 2019 with which Defendants
could have tortiously interfered. Defendants say (1) the DSG
Sublease remained an asset of the bankruptcy estate that was never
assumed and assigned to Transform (2) the Bankruptcy Code prevented
Transform and DSG from forming a separate sublease outside of the
bankruptcy until at least 2022 when the DSG Sublease was rejected
as part of the Sears reorganization plan, and, (3) no new contract
was formed because the Fifth Amendment lacked the necessary terms.
In response, DSG says (1) even if the DSG Sublease was rejected in
the bankruptcy in 2022, that breach did not terminate the contract
or extinguish DSG's right to continue the sublease or amend it; (2)
Defendants lack standing to challenge the validity of the Fifth
Amendment; (3) DSG took on the DSG Sublease as an "Assumed Lease
Liability" under Sec. 2.3 of the APA and the Assignment and
Assumption; and (4) the Fifth Amendment was a sufficient writing to
create a new contract between DSG and Transform.
According to Judge Reinhart, "For the reasons explained in DSG's
pleadings, the Bankruptcy Court's Assignment Order transferred the
DSG Sublease from Sears to Transform as an Assumed Lease Liability
under the APA. At that point, the DSG Sublease ceased to be an
asset of the bankruptcy estate. Having acquired the DSG Sublease in
this way, Transform had the legal authority to amend it and to
separately sublease it to DSG without further approval from the
Bankruptcy Court."
Partial summary judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff on the
issue of whether a valid contract existed for purposes of Count I
at the time of the November 2019 Development Application.
DSG's Motion in Limine
DSG's motion asked the District Court to "exclude evidence or
argument suggesting that the treatment of the DSG Sublease or the
REA in the Sears bankruptcy provides any defense to DSG's claims."
DSG says that causation and damages must be analyzed on a "but for"
basis. They say any evidence or argument that the DSG Sublease was
rejected in the Sears bankruptcy and thereby affected causation or
damages is irrelevant and would be unduly confusing for the jury.
"After assignment and assumption, Transform was free to enter into
a new relationship with DSG that included subletting exterior
signage rights," Judge Reinhart concludes.
The motion in limine is granted.
In this Order and in the Summary Judgment Order, the District Court
now has resolved the interpretation of the REA as a matter of law.
It has also resolved the legal implications of the Sears bankruptcy
and the Fifth Amendment to the DSG Sublease on the issues to be
tried. These interpretations are binding on the parties for
purposes of trial. No contrary arguments may be made to the jury.
A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Lm2P4N
About Sears Holdings Corp.
Sears Holdings Corporation -- http://www.searsholdings.com/--
began as a mail ordering catalog company in 1887 and became the
world's largest retailer in the 1960s. At its peak, Sears was
present in almost every big mall across the U.S., and sold
everything from toys and auto parts to mail-order homes. Sears
claims to be a market leader in the appliance, tool, lawn and
garden, fitness equipment, and automotive repair and maintenance
retail sectors.
Sears and Kmart merged to form Sears Holdings in 2005 when they had
3,500 US stores between them. Kmart emerged in 2005 from its own
bankruptcy.
Unable to keep up with online stores and other brick-and-mortar
retailers, a long series of store closings left it with 687 retail
stores in 49 states, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands
as of mid-October 2018. At that time, the Company employed 68,000
individuals.
As of Aug. 4, 2018, Sears Holdings had $6.93 billion in total
assets against $11.33 billion in total liabilities.
Unable to cover a $134 million debt payment due Oct. 15, 2018,
Sears Holdings Corporation and 49 subsidiaries sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-23538) on Oct. 15,
2018. The Hon. Robert D. Drain is the case judge.
The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as legal counsel;
M-III Partners as restructuring advisor; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC as
investment banker; DLA Piper LLP as real estate advisor; and Prime
Clerk as claims and noticing agent.
The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed nine creditors, including
the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., and landlord Simon Property
Group, L.P., to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors. The committee tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
as legal counsel; FTI Consulting as financial advisor; and Houlihan
Lokey Capital, Inc. as investment banker.
The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 on July 9, 2019, appointed five
retirees to serve on the committee representing retirees with life
insurance benefits in the Chapter 11 cases.
In February 2019, Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain authorized Sears
Holdings approval to sell the business to majority shareholder and
CEO Eddie Lampert for approximately $5.2 billion. Lampert's ESL
Investments, Inc., won an auction to acquire substantially all of
Sears' assets, including the "Go Forward Stores" on a going-concern
basis. The proposal allowed 425 stores to remain open and provided
ongoing employment to 45,000 employees.
The new parent is Transform SR Brands LLC, doing business as
Transformco, referred to as "New Sears". Transform is an American
privately held company formed on Feb. 11, 2019, to acquire some of
the assets of Sears Holdings Corporation. The new company is owned
by Eddie Lampert's ESL Investments.
SENSORLOGIC INC: Hires Shimanek Law PLLC as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
Sensorlogic Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Montana to employ Shimanek Law P.L.L.C. as
counsel.
The firm's services include general counseling and local
representation before the Bankruptcy Court in connection with the
bankruptcy case.
The firm will be paid at $300 per hour.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Matt Shimanek, Esq., a partner at Shimanek Law PLLC, disclosed in a
court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Matt Shimanek, Esq.
Shimanek Law PLLC
317 East Spruce St.
Missoula, MT 59802
Tel: (406) 544-8049
Email: matt@shimaneklaw.com
About Sensorlogic Inc.
Sensorlogic, Inc. filed a petition under Chapter 11, Subchapter V
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Mont. Case No. 24-20112) on
August 8, 2024, with $100,001 to $500,000 in assets and $500,001 to
$1 million in liabilities.
Judge Benjamin P. Hursh presides over the case.
Matthew F. Shimanek, Esq., at Shimanek Law, PLLC represents the
Debtor as bankruptcy counsel.
SHOMYA TEFILAH: Hits Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection
-----------------------------------------------------
Shomya Tefilah LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in the Southern
District of New York. According to court filing, the Debtor reports
$1,550,000 in debt owed to 1 and 49 creditors. The petition states
funds will be available to unsecured creditors.
A meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. Section 341(a) is slated for
Oct. 10, 2024 at 1:00 p.m. at Office of UST (TELECONFERENCE ONLY).
About Shomya Tefilah LLC
Shomya Tefilah LLC is the owner of real property located at 17
Koritz Way, Spring Valley, NY 10977 having an estimated value of
$1.2 million.
Shomya Tefilah LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 24-22765) on Sept. 9,
2024. In the petition filed by Jacob Rothschild, as managing
member, the Debtor reports total assets of $1,200,000 and total
liabilities of $1,550,000.
The Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Sean H. Lane oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by:
H. Bruce Bronson, Esq.
BRONSON LAW OFFICES PC
480 Mamaroneck Ave
HarrisonHarrison, NY 10528
Tel: (914) 269-2530
Fax: (888) 908-6906
E-mail: hbbronson@bronsonlaw.net
SIGNATURE BANK: Tax Agency Urges Court to Toss FDIC Tax Refund Bid
------------------------------------------------------------------
Anna Scott Farrell of Law360 reports that a California tax
collection agency asked a New York federal court to throw out
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. claims seeking a more than $20
million tax refund on behalf of the shuttered Signature Bank,
saying the agency is entitled to wait for a potential IRS audit to
end.
About Signature Bank
Headquartered in New York, Signature Bank, New York NY, was a full
service commercial bank that serves privately owned business
clients and their owners and senior managers. Signature Bank had
40 branches across the country in New York, California,
Connecticut, North Carolina, and Nevada.
Signature Bank, New York, NY, was closed March 12, 2023, by the New
York State Department of Financial Services, which appointed the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To
protect depositors, the FDIC transferred all the deposits and
substantially all of the assets of Signature Bank to Signature
Bridge Bank, N.A., a full-service bank that will be operated by the
FDIC as it markets the institution to potential bidders.
SNAP MEDICAL: Hires Mendoza & Associates as Accountant
------------------------------------------------------
Snap Medical Transport, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Texas to employ Mendoza &
Associates as accountant.
The firm's services include providing regular, ongoing accounting,
auditing and tax return preparation services and preparing monthly
operating reports.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Bookkeeping $575 per month
Payroll $150 per month
Reporting $250
Quickbooks subscription $70
As disclosed in a court filing, Mendoza & Associates is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Mendoza & Associates, LLC
2023 Lockhill Selma Rd 1
San Antonio, TX 78213
Tel: (210) 960-9021
Email: info@mendozaassociatesllc.com
About Snap Medical Transport, LLC
Snap Medical Transport, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 24-51370) on
July 23, 2024, with up to $500,000 in assets and up to $10 million
in liabilities.
David T. Cain, Esq. represents the Debtor as legal counsel.
SOLDIER OPERATING: Seeks to Extend Plan Filing Deadline to Oct. 10
------------------------------------------------------------------
Soldier Operating, LLC and Viceroy Petroleum, LP, asked the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana to extend
its period to file a chapter 11 plan of reorganization and
disclosure statement to October 10, 2024.
The Debtors explain that they seek to provide an opportunity for
more expeditious resolution and payment of claims through
confirmation of a plan that contemplates a complex transaction
substantially affecting (a) Viceroy's present assets in Louisiana
and (b) Soldier's role as oil and gas operator of the Louisiana
assets. The plan is being developed with the input of the unsecured
creditors' committee.
The Debtors claim that they need additional time to obtain an
executed a letter of intent from the counterparty, Spectrum, LLC.
Spectrum and Debtors have proposed and counter-proposed terms, and
have reached an agreement in principle.
The Debtors assert that their professionals are actively
negotiating and pursuing the transaction. Members of Chaffe &
Associates, the investment banking firm retained by Viceroy, have
participated in numerous conferences with Debtors and Debtors'
counsel (bankruptcy counsel and oil and gas counsel), and with
Spectrum to discuss the proposed transaction.
The Debtors submit that the requested extension will increase the
likelihood of a successful joint plan of reorganization that
maximizes the reorganization value, such that the requested
extension is warranted and appropriate under the circumstances.
Counsel to the Debtors:
Bradley L. Drell, Esq.
Heather M. Mathews, Esq.
Gold Weems Bruser Sues & Rundell, APLC
P.O. Box 6118
Alexandria, LA 71307-6118
Tel: (318) 445-6471
Fax: (318) 445-6476
Email: bdrell@goldweems.com
About Soldier Operating
Soldier Operating, LLC and Viceroy Petroleum, LP filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. W.D. La. Lead Case No. 24-50387) on May 13, 2024. In the
petitions signed by Matthew Ferguson, president, Soldier Operating
disclosed $5,615,631 in assets and $6,089,722 in liabilities.
Judge John W. Kolwe presides over the cases.
Bradley L. Drell, Esq., at Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell,
APLC, is the Debtors' counsel.
The U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of unsecured
creditors in these Chapter 11 cases. The committee tapped H. Kent
Aguillard, Esq., and Caleb K. Aguillard, Esq., and Stewart Robbins
Brown & Altazan, LLC as co-counsel.
SOLUNA HOLDINGS: Cancels Pre-Paid Advances Under SEPA
-----------------------------------------------------
Soluna Holdings, Inc. disclosed in a Form 8-K Report filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that on August 12, 2024,
the Company executed a Standby Equity Purchase Agreement with YA II
PN, LTD., a Cayman Islands exempt limited company, under which
Pre-Paid Advances could be made. Both parties have mutually decided
not to proceed with the Pre-Paid Advances, and to continue to work
within the SEPA, which will require the filing, and effectiveness,
of an S-1 Registration Statement, meeting certain conditions
precedent including the consent of third-parties and obtaining any
required shareholder approvals.
About Soluna Holdings
Headquartered in Albany, New York, Soluna Holdings designs,
develops, and operates digital infrastructure that transforms
surplus renewable energy into global computing resources. The
Company's modular data centers can be co-located with wind, solar,
or hydroelectric power plants and support compute-intensive
applications, including Bitcoin mining, generative AI, and
scientific computing. This approach aids in energizing a greener
grid while providing cost-effective and sustainable computing
solutions.
As of June 30, 2024, Soluna Holdings reported $98.68 million in
total assets, $48.74 million in total liabilities, and $49.93
million in total equity.
Going Concern
The Company was in a net loss, has negative working capital, and
has significant outstanding debt as of March 31, 2024. These
factors, among others, indicate that there is substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern within
one year after the issuance of the Company's condensed financial
statements, according to the Company's Quarterly Report for the
period ended March 31, 2024.
SONOMA PHARMACEUTICALS: Amends Equity Distribution Deal With Maxim
------------------------------------------------------------------
As previously disclosed, on December 15, 2023, Sonoma
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement
with Maxim Group LLC, pursuant to which the Company may offer and
sell, from time to time, through Maxim, as sales agent or
principal, shares of its common stock, $0.0001 par value per share.
On March 8, 2024, the Company entered into an amendment to the
Agreement.
Sales of shares of common stock under the Agreement, as amended by
Amendment No. 1, will be made pursuant to the registration
statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-275311), which was declared
effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 20, 2023, the prospects included therein, and a related
prospectus supplement filed with the SEC on September 20, 2024.
About Sonoma Pharmaceuticals
Sonoma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: SNOA) --
http://www.sonomapharma.com/-- is a global healthcare company
developing and producing stabilized hypochlorous acid, or HOCl,
products for a wide range of applications, including wound care,
eye care, oral care, dermatological conditions, podiatry, animal
health care, and non-toxic disinfectants. The Company's products
reduce infections, itch, pain, scarring, and harmful inflammatory
responses in a safe and effective manner. In-vitro and clinical
studies of HOCl show it to have impressive antipruritic,
antimicrobial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory properties. The
Company's stabilized HOCl immediately relieves itch and pain, kills
pathogens and breaks down biofilm, does not sting or irritate the
skin, and oxygenates the cells in the area treated, assisting the
body in its natural healing process. The Company sells its products
either directly or via partners in 55 countries worldwide.
Tampa, Florida-based Frazier & Deeter, LLC, the Company's auditor
since 2021, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated June 17, 2024, citing that the Company has incurred
significant losses and negative operating cash flows and needs to
raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its
operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.
Sonoma Pharmaceuticals reported a net loss of $4,835,000 for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2024, compared to a net loss of
$5,151,000 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023. As of June 30,
2024, Sonoma Pharmaceuticals had $13,673,000 in total assets,
$8,698,000 in total liabilities, and $4,975,000 in total
stockholders' equity.
SOUTH COAST: Hires Van Horn Law Group as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
South Coast Equipment LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Florida to employ Van Horn Law
Group as bankruptcy counsel.
The firm's services include:
(a) advise the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties as
a debtor in possession and the continued management of its business
operations;
(b) advise the Debtor with respect to its responsibilities in
complying with the U.S. Trustee's Operating Guidelines and
Reporting Requirements and with the rules of the court;
(c) prepare all legal documents;
(d) protect the interest of the Debtor in all matters pending
before the court; and
(e) represent the Debtor in negotiation with its creditors in
the preparation of a plan.
The firm's hourly rates range from $150 to $450 per hour for law
clerks, paralegals, and attorneys.
The firm received a retainer in the amount of $11,738.
Mr. Horn disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached through:
Chad Van Horn, Esq.
Van Horn Law Group, P.A.
500 NE 4th Street #200
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Telephone: (954) 765-3166
Facsimile: (954) 756-7103
Email: Chad@cvhlawgroup.com
About South Coast Equipment LLC
South Coast Equipment LLC in Miami, FL, sought relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code filed its voluntary petition for Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 24-19043) on Sept. 3,
2024, listing $618,928 in assets and $1,219,748 in liabilities.
David Presmanes as president, signed the petition.
Judge Laurel M. Isicoff oversees the case.
VAN HORN LAW GROUP, P.A. serve as the Debtor's legal counsel.
STERETT COMPANIES: Seeks Cash Access Extension Thru December 2
--------------------------------------------------------------
Sterett Companies, LLC asks U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Kentucky
Owensboro Division for authority to use cash collateral and to
extend the Challenge Period for the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors.
This extension allows the Committee additional time to review and
potentially contest the validity and priority of prepetition liens
held by the lenders. The extension aims to facilitate thorough
evaluations of the Debtors' financial status and the implications
of recent asset sales, ultimately supporting the reorganization
process and maximizing recovery for creditors.
Initially, a challenge period was established, allowing the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors to contest the validity
of prepetition liens until January 10, 2024. Since then, the
challenge period has been extended multiple times through agreed
orders, reflecting ongoing negotiations and the need for adequate
time for the Committee to review the Debtors' financial situation.
Most recently, the Bankruptcy Court has entered an order to extend
the challenge period, which was set to expire on September 30,
2024. This extension is granted to provide more time for the
Committee to evaluate the results of a recent asset sale and to
continue discussions regarding the stipulations acknowledged in
previous orders.
The new order establishes that the challenge period will now extend
until either the effective date of a joint Chapter 11 plan filed by
the Lenders and the Committee on December 2, 2024. This extension
underscores the collaborative efforts among the Debtors, lenders,
and the Committee to facilitate a successful reorganization
process.
Overall, the agreed extension reflects positive progress in the
Debtors' cases and aims to ensure that all parties have sufficient
time to address financial matters effectively as they move towards
a potential plan confirmation.
Counsel for the Debtors:
Neil C. Bordy, Esq.
William P. Harbison, Esq.
Joseph H. Haddad, Esq.
SEILLER WATERMAN LLC
Meidinger Tower - 22nd Floor
462 S. Fourth Street
Louisville, KY 40202
Tel: (502) 584-7400
Fax: (502) 583-2100
E-mail: bordy@derbycitylaw.com
harbison@derbycitylaw.com
haddad@derbycitylaw.com
About Sterett Companies, LLC
Sterett Companies, LLC, based in Owensboro, Kentucky, operates in
the heavy equipment and logistics industry. The company specializes
in services such as equipment rental, heavy hauling, and crane
operations, catering to various sectors with an emphasis on safety
and efficiency.
Sterett Companies, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 23-40625) on October
27, 2023. In the petition signed by William L. Sterett, III, CEO,
the Debtor disclosed up to $50,000 in assets and up to $50 million
in liabilities.
Judge Charles R. Merrill oversees the case.
Neil C. Bordy, Esq., at Seiller Waterman LLC, is the Debtor's legal
counsel.
STERLING CREDIT: Hires GGG Advisors LLC as Financial Advisor
------------------------------------------------------------
Sterling Credit Corp. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Florida to employ GGG Advisors, LLC as
financial and plan advisor.
The firm will advise debtor regarding the Debtor's financial
condition, financial projections, valuations and marketability of
assets, development and confirmation of a plan of reorganization
and alternatives thereto, and related financial matters.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Richard Gaudet $425 per hour
Adam Cohen, partner $375 per hour
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Richard Gaudet, a partner at GGG Advisors, LLC, disclosed in a
court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Richard Gaudet
GGG Advisors, LLC
3155 Roswell Rd NE, Suite 120
Atlanta, GA 30305
Tel: (404) 256-0003
Email: rgaudet@gggpartners.com
About Sterling Credit Corp.
Sterling Credit Corp. provides capital and collection services to
customers. It is based in Altamonte Springs, Fla.
Sterling Credit sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 24-02830) on June 4,
2024, with $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities. William R. Ward, president, signed the petition.
Judge Tiffany P. Geyer oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by Robert Drake Wilcox, Esq., at Wilcox
Law Firm.
On July 17, 2024, the U.S. Trustee for the Middle District of
Florida appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors in
this Chapter 11 case. The committee tapped Shuker & Dorris, PA as
its counsel.
STEWARD HEALTH CARE: Gets $4.5 Million Stalking Horse Bid
---------------------------------------------------------
Emlyn Cameron of Law360 Bankruptcy Authority reports that embattled
hospital operator Steward Health Care has informed a Texas
bankruptcy judge that the company intends to accept a Texas-based
Catholic health system's $4.5 million stalking horse offer for one
of its facilities in the state.
About Steward Health Care
Steward Health Care System, LLC owns and operates the largest
private physician-owned for-profit healthcare network in the U.S.
Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, Steward's operations include 31
hospitals in eight states, approximately 400 facility locations,
4,500 primary and specialty care physicians, 3,600 staffed beds,
and nearly 30,000 employees. Steward Health Care provides care to
more than two million patients annually.
Steward and 166 affiliated debtors filed Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. S.D. Texas Lead Case No. 24-90213) on May 6, 2024. Judge
Christopher M. Lopez oversees the proceeding.
The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; McDermott Will & Emery as special corporate and regulatory
counsel; AlixPartners, LLP as financial advisor and John Castellano
of AlixPartners as chief restructuring officer. Lazard Freres & Co.
LLC, Leerink Partners LLC, and Cain Brothers, a division of KeyBanc
Capital Markets Inc., provide investment banking services to the
Debtors. Kroll is the claims agent.
Susan N. Goodman has been appointed as patient care ombudsman in
the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.
STOOL AND DINETTE: Court OKs Public Auction of Personal Property
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona on Sept. 25
approved the sale of Stool and Dinette Factory, Inc.'s personal
property by public auction.
The property consists of inventory and other tangible personal
property used by the company to operate its furniture retail
business in Scottsdale, Ariz.
Stool and Dinette started an online bidding on Sept. 21 and hosted
an in-person preview on Sept. 24. The online auction ran until
Sept. 25.
The company sold its property promptly due to the requirement to
move out of the premises no later than Sept. 30. Buyers are
required to pay for, and remove, their purchases within two days
after the auction to facilitate the company's vacating the premises
by the Sept. 30 deadline.
The sale is "free and clear" of liens, claims, and interests, with
the liens of the Arizona Department of Revenue and the U.S. Small
Business Administration to attach to the proceeds.
Cunningham & Associates, Inc., the auctioneer hired by the company,
will get a commission of 35% of the gross proceeds.
About Stool and Dinette Factory
Stool and Dinette Factory, Inc. a company in Scottsdale, Ariz.,
filed its voluntary petition for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.
Ariz. Case No. 24-06900) on August 21, 2024, with $100,001 to
$500,000 in assets and $500,001 to $1 million in liabilities.
Kenneth L. Felder, president, signed the petition.
Judge Paul Sala oversees the case.
James F. Kahn, Esq., at Kahn & Ahart, PLLC serves as the Debtor's
legal counsel.
SUCCESS VILLAGE: Court Lifts Chapter 11 Stay
--------------------------------------------
Daniel Tepfer of CTPost reports that dozens of Success Village
residents cheered in the courtroom Thursday, September 19, 2024, as
a federal bankruptcy judge agreed to lift the stay barring state
court proceedings to appoint a financial overseer for the troubled
924-unit complex.
Judge Julie Manning ruled that the case is to immediately go back
before Superior Court Judge Dale Radcliffe, who appeared about to
order that a receiver be appointed when a lawyer for the management
of the co-op announced that they had filed bankruptcy, abruptly
stopping the proceeding.
The judge reserved decision on a request by lawyers for the city,
the town of Stratford and two utility companies to dismiss the
bankruptcy filing although she did say it appears the co-op's
management was "seeking refuge in a bankruptcy case."
She ruled that the automatic stay for bankruptcy proceedings did
not apply to the city and the town of Stratford because it would
prevent them from enforcing their police and fire authority.
"It's a federal judge so there's not much to say about that,"
Tyreke Bird, the president of the co-op board said following the
decision as he left the federal courthouse. He declined further
comment.
"The town of Stratford and the city of Bridgeport are grateful for
the court's immediate ruling," said Richard Buturla, the lawyer for
the two municipalities. "We look forward to getting back before
Judge Radcliffe and we are hopeful a receiver will be appointed."
Buturla, claimed that the co-op's management filed for bankruptcy
in bad faith and ignored the bankruptcy judge's order to provide
supporting documents.
"In this case, the debtor filed chapter 11 on the eve of the likely
appointment of a state court receiver to address a humanitarian
crisis involving a critical and chronic lack of heat and hot water
for thousands of residential tenants of the debtor, numerous and
presently unabated safety, health and fire code violations by the
debtor in the town of Stratford and the city of Bridgeport, the
debtor's infrastructure failures, and the debtor's lack of a plan
or the financial resources to remedy the urgent and ongoing
crisis," Buturla's motion stated.
Attorney Mathew Beatman, who argued the case before the judge for
the city and Stratford, told her that both municipalities are very
concerned about the complex's finances. Court documents show that
two years ago the co-op had a surplus but now is $3 million in debt
and has just $6,000 in the bank.
"There is a question of where the money has gone, there is money
somewhere we just don't know what happened to it," Beatman said.
Norwalk attorney Mark Kratter, hired Wednesday afternoon by Bird to
handle the bankruptcy case, was hardpressed to come up with a
defense.
"I just got hired yesterday," he repeated to questions from the
judge, invoking laughter from the gallery.
"You came into this case, you could have said no," the judge told
him.
Attorney Andre Cayo, who filed the bankruptcy application stood up
to address the judge but was promptly told by her to sit down and
say nothing because he had not filed the proper documents to
represent the co-op.
Bird and Cayo filed for bankruptcy on behalf of the complex that
straddles the Bridgeport/Stratford line. The move came as the
co-op's management was being pressed by Judge DaleRadcliffe to
present a defense to lawsuits by the city, Stratford and utilities
seeking to have a receiver appointed for the co-op.
The bankruptcy filing halted the case, preventing Radcliffe from
making a ruling.
The city and town councils voted to file the lawsuits following the
shutdown of the complex's heating system in May. State inspectors
ordered the boilers shut down after finding them in a dangerous
condition. No permanent heating system for the apartments has yet
to be installed and many apartments are also without hot water.
Under state, law if residents still don't have heat once heating
season begins next month than the city and the town will be
responsible for relocating the more than 2,000 residents.
According to court testimony, the co-op owes $241,597 in back taxes
to the town of Stratford and more than $2 million in delinquent
taxes to Bridgeport.
Among the expenses the co-op's management paid in 2023, according
documents in court, was $923,000 in legal expenses, $422,000 in
management fees and $289,000 in consulting expenses.
Documents also showed numerous withdrawals that were made from the
co-op's bank account at a bank branch on Boston Avenue on two days
in February and one day in August.
During the nearly three-hour hearing Judge Manning made it clear
that she was concerned the co-op's residents are without heat and
hot water and that there were numerous health and saftey violations
there.
About Success Village Apartments Inc.
Success Village Apartments Inc. -- https://www.svanow.com/ -- is an
apartment complex in Bridgeport, Connecticut.
Success Village Apartments Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ct. Case No. 24-50624) on Sept.
6, 2024. In the petition filed by Tyreke Bird, as president, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities between $1 million and $10
million each.
The Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Julie A. Manning oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by:
Andre Cayo, Esq.
2777 Summer St.
Stamford CT 06905
Tel: 203-517-0416
Email: CayoLaw@gmail.com
SUNPOWER CORP: To Be Delisted From Nasdaq Effective Sept. 30
------------------------------------------------------------
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (the Exchange) disclosed in a 25-NSE
that it has determined to remove from listing the securities of
SunPower Corporation, effective at the opening of the trading
session on September 30, 2024. Based on review of information
provided by the Company, Nasdaq Staff determined that the Company
no longer qualified for listing on the Exchange pursuant to Listing
Rules 5101, 5110(b), IM-5101-1, and 5250(c)(1).
The Company was notified of the Staff determination on August 7,
2024. The Company did not appeal the Staff determination to the
Hearings Panel. The Company securities were suspended on August 16,
2024. The Staff determination to delist the Company securities
became final on August 16, 2024.
About SunPower
Headquartered in Richmond, California, SunPower (NASDAQ: SPWR) --
SunPower -- is a residential solar, storage, and energy services
provider in North America. SunPower offers solar + storage
solutions that give customers control over electricity consumption
and resiliency during power outages while providing cost savings to
homeowners.
SunPower Corporation and nine of its affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del., Lead
Case No. 24-11649) on August 5, 2024. In the petition signed by
Matthew Henry as chief transformation officer, the Debtors
disclosed total assets of $1,219,276,283 and total debts of
$1,119,141,312 as of December 31, 2023.
The Debtors have engaged Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. and
Kirkland & Ellis LP as bankruptcy counsel. Alvarez & Marsal North
America, LLC serves as financial advisor to the Debtors. Moelis &
Company LLC acts as investment banker to the Debtors, and Epiq
Systems Inc. acts as notice and claims agent.
SUPREME ELECTRICAL: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection
----------------------------------------------------------
Supreme Electrical Services Inc. filed Chapter 11 protection in the
Southern District of Texas. According to court documents, the
Debtor reports between $1 million and $10 million in debt owed to
50 and 99 creditors. The petition states funds will be available to
unsecured creditors.
About Supreme Electrical Services Inc.
Supreme Electrical Services Inc., doing business as Lime
Instruments LLC, Lime Electric, and Bingo Interests, is a
Houston-based global provider of leading-edge controls and
instrumentation systems for the energy and industrial control
markets. The Company offers a flexible hardware and software
platform that can be configured and modified to meet the specific
needs of the most challenging control applications.
Supreme Electrical Services Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 24-90504) on
September 11, 2024. In the petition filed by Christian Schwartz, as
chief restructuring officer, the Debtor reports estimated assets
and liabilities between $1 million and $10 million each.
The Debtor is represented by:
Michael P. Ridulfo, Esq.
KANE RUSSELL COLEMAN LOGAN PC
5151 San Felipe
Houston TX 77056
Tel: 713-425-7442
Email: mridulfo@krcl.com
TAG FL LLC: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection in Florida
-------------------------------------------------------------
TAG FL LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in the Middle District of
Florida. According to court filing, the Debtor reports $2,944,095
in debt owed to 1 and 49 creditors. The petition states funds will
be available to unsecured creditors.
A meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. Section 341(a) is slated for
October 21, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. in Room Telephonically on telephone
conference line: 877-801-2055. participant access code: 8940738#.
About TAG FL LLC
TAG FL LLC is the owner of real property located at 200 N. Harper
Street, Laurens, SC 32819 valued at $1.5 million.
TAG FL LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 24-04923) on September 13, 2024. In
the petition filed by Tarek Aly, as manager, the Debtor reports
total assets of $1,500,000 and total liabilities of $2,944,095.
The Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Lori V. Vaughan oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by:
Kenneth D. Herron, Jr., Esq.
HERRON HILL LAW GROUP, PLLC
P.O. Box 2127
Orlando, FL 32802
Tel: 407-648-0058
Email: chip@herronhilllaw.com
TEREX CORP: Moody's Affirms 'Ba2' CFR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings affirmed Terex Corporation's Ba2 corporate family
rating and Ba2-PD probability of default rating. Moody's also
affirmed the Baa2 rating on the company's existing $600 million
senior secured revolving credit facilities and Ba3 senior unsecured
rating. Concurrently, Moody's assigned Baa3 ratings to the
company's proposed $1.25 billion senior secured term loan and $800
million senior secured revolving credit facility (comprised of a
$400 million US facility and $400 million multicurrency facility).
Moody's will withdraw the ratings on the existing senior secured
revolving credit facility at the close of the transaction. The
outlook is stable. The company's speculative grade liquidity rating
was unchanged at SGL-1.
Proceeds from the term loan, an expected unsecured debt issuance
and cash will be used to fund the $2 billion acquisition of the
Environmental Solutions Group (ESG) of Dover Corporation (Baa1
stable) and transaction expenses. The rating on the new secured
debt will be Baa3, one notch lower than the Baa2 on the existing
secured debt, resulting from more secured debt in the new capital
structure.
The affirmation of the Ba2 CFR and stable outlook reflect Moody's
view that Terex can absorb the impact of the debt financed
acquisition without significant disruption despite a recent
reduction in the company's guidance. Pro forma for the transaction,
debt-to-LTM EBITDA would have been 3.2 times at June 30, 2024, up
from 1.1 times. Recent developments have delayed Moody's
expectation of the pace Terex will deleverage. Moody's now expect
the company's debt-to-EBITDA will remain above 3 times over the
next 12-18 months before improving significantly thereafter.
RATINGS RATIONALE
Terex's ratings reflect the company's good scale, healthy customer
and geographic diversification and well established brands.
Debt-to-EBITDA is low but will increase materially as a result of
the acquisition. In addition, demand has softened in both Materials
Processing (MP) and Aerial Work Platforms (AWP) because of customer
and dealer fleet realignment in response to economic uncertainty
and regional construction volatility. Moody's expect ESG will help
reduce Terex's cyclicality because of its exposure to the stable
waste collection market.
The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that Terex will
integrate the acquisition of ESG with minimal operational
disruption. Moody's also expect revenue will decline in 2025, but
the addition of the higher margin ESG business will enable Terex to
generate over $350 million of free cash flow over the next year.
The SGL-1 speculative grade liquidity rating reflects Moody's
expectation that Terex will have very good liquidity over the next
12 to 18 months. The $800 million revolving credit facility will
have $40 million drawn at the close of the transaction and will
expire in 2029. The revolver has springing covenants that are
tested when borrowings exceed 30% of the facility amount requiring
maximum senior secured net leverage of 3 times. Moody's do not
expect the covenants will be tested over the next twelve months.
However, if the covenants were tested Moody's would expect the
company to be in compliance.
FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS
The ratings could be upgraded if Terex integrates ESG with minimal
operational disruption and EBITA margin is sustained around 14%.
The company would also need to demonstrate its commitment to
reducing debt while maintaining very good liquidity and
conservative financial policies.
The ratings could be downgraded if the company experiences
integration challenges with ESG or debt-to-EBITDA does not decline
to below 3.0 times. Also, if liquidity weakens significantly or if
the company implements a more aggressive financial policy with an
increased focus on additional acquisitions or shareholder returns
the ratings could be downgraded.
Marketing terms for the new credit facilities (final terms may
differ materially) include the following:
Incremental pari passu debt capacity up to the greater of $925
million and 100% of consolidated EBITDA, plus unlimited amounts
subject to 2.75x first lien net leverage ratio. There is an inside
maturity up to the greater of $925 million and 100% of consolidated
EBITDA. There are no "blocker" provisions which prohibit the
transfer of specified assets to unrestricted subsidiaries. There
are no protective provisions restricting an up-tiering transaction.
Amounts up to 100% of unused capacity from the builder basket and
the general restricted payment basket may be reallocated to incur
debt.
The principal methodology used in these ratings was Manufacturing
published in September 2021.
Headquartered in Norwalk, CT, Terex Corporation (NYSE: TEX) is a
global manufacturer of material processing machinery and aerial
work platforms. Terex designs, builds and supports products used in
maintenance, manufacturing, energy, recycling, minerals and
materials management, and construction applications. Terex engages
with customers through all stages of the product life cycle, from
initial specification to parts and service support. Following the
close of the ESG acquisition, Terex will report in three business
segments: Environmental Solutions, Materials Processing and
Aerials.
TERRAFORM LABS: Court Clears Liquidation Plan Despite Objections
----------------------------------------------------------------
Evan Ochsner of Bloomberg Law reports that Terraform Labs Pte. won
approval of its liquidation plan after a bankruptcy judge overruled
the objections of some retail users of the fallen digital asset
platform.
Judge Brendan Shannon of the US Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware on Thursday, September 19, 2024, said he'd enter an
order confirming Terraform's liquidation plan. His ruling comes
three months after the company agreed to pay $4.47 billion to
resolve a US Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuit related to
the firm's 2022 collapse.
During Thursday's hearing, Shannon heard from former users of the
platform who said their claims were being treated unfairly.
About Terraform Labs
Terraform Labs Pte. Ltd. -- https://www.terra.money/ -- is a
startup that created Terra, a blockchain protocol and payment
platform used for algorithmic stablecoins. It was co-founded by Do
Kwon and Daniel Shin in 2018 in Seoul, South Korea.
Terraform Labs introduced its first cryptocurrency token, TerraUSD,
in 2019. Investment firms like Arrington Capital, Coinbase
Ventures, Galaxy Digital, and Lightspeed Venture Partners helped
Terraform Labs raise more than $200 million.
The collapse of the stablecoins TerraUSD (UST) and Luna in May 2022
caused the temporary suspension of the Terra network, wiping out
over $45 billion in market capitalization in a single week.
Both of Terra Form Labs' founders have encountered legal problems
as a result of the devaluation of the company's currency. In
September 2022, South Korean prosecutors filed a warrant for Do
Kwon's arrest. He was also added to Interpol's Red Notice list,
which urges other law enforcement to find and detain him.
Terraform Labs Pte. Ltd. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 24-10070) on Jan. 22,
2024. In the petition filed by Chris Amani, as chief executive
officer, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities between $100
million and $500 million each.
The Debtor is represented by:
Zachary I Shapiro, Esq.
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
1 Wallich Street
#37-01
Guoco Tower 078881
TERVIS TUMBLER: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 appointed an official committee to
represent unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of Tervis
Tumbler Company.
The committee members are:
1. Packsize, LLC
Brady Pettit
3760 W. Smart Pack Way
Salt Lake City, UT 84104
c/o Laura M. Brymer, counsel
Fultz Maddox Dickens, PLC
101 S. Fifth Street, Ste, 2700
Louisville, KY 40202
2. SIC Products, LLC
Erik Howe, Managing Partner
5130 Kristin Court
Naples, FL 34105
c/o Anthony Manganiello, Counsel
2033 Main St., Ste. 600
Sarasota, FL34237
3. Association of Pickelball Professionals, LLC
c/o Austin Weaver, General Counsel
303 E. Wacker Dr., #2200
Chicago, IL 60601
4. TMF Plastics Solutions, LLC
Greg Kuppler, President
c/o Shutts & Bowen LLP
4301 W Boy Scout Blvd, Suite 300
Tampa, FL 33607
c/o Clingen Callow & McLean, LLC
John A. Lipinsky, Esq.
2300 Cabot Drive, Suite 500
Lisle, IL 60532
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent. They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.
About Tervis Tumbler Co.
Tervis Tumbler Co. -- https://www.tervis.com -- is a
third-generation American-owned and -operated company, renowned for
the durable construction of its drinkware, the timelessness of its
decorations and designs, and the insulation qualities.
Tervis Tumbler Co. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 24-05274) on September
5, 2024, with $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities. Hosana Fieber, president and chief executive officer,
signed the petition.
Judge Roberta A. Colton oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by Steven M Berman, Esq., at Shumaker,
Loop & Kendrick, LLP.
TERVIS TUMBLER: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 appointed an official committee to
represent unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of Tervis
Tumbler Company.
The committee members are:
1. Packsize, LLC
Brady Pettit
3760 W. Smart Pack Way
Salt Lake City, UT 84104
c/o Laura M. Brymer, counsel
Fultz Maddox Dickens, PLC
101 S. Fifth Street, Ste, 2700
Louisville, KY 40202
2. SIC Products, LLC
Erik Howe, Managing Partner
5130 Kristin Court
Naples, FL 34105
c/o Anthony Manganiello, Counsel
2033 Main St., Ste. 600
Sarasota, FL34237
3. Association of Pickelball Professionals, LLC
c/o Austin Weaver, General Counsel
303 E. Wacker Dr., #2200
Chicago, IL 60601
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent. They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.
About Tervis Tumbler Co.
Tervis Tumbler Co. -- https://www.tervis.com -- is a
third-generation American-owned and -operated company, renowned for
the durable construction of its drinkware, the timelessness of its
decorations and designs, and the insulation qualities.
Tervis Tumbler Co. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 24-05274) on September
5, 2024, with $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities. Hosana Fieber, president and chief executive officer,
signed the petition.
Judge Roberta A. Colton oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by Steven M Berman, Esq., at Shumaker,
Loop & Kendrick, LLP.
THERAPEUTICS MD: Schedules 2024 Annual Meeting for Dec. 5
---------------------------------------------------------
TherapeuticsMD, Inc., disclosed in a Form 8-K Report filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that it will hold its 2024
Annual Meeting of Stockholders on Thursday, December 5, 2024.
Holders of record of the Company's common stock outstanding as of
the close of business on Thursday, October 17, 2024, will be
entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 2024 Annual Meeting. The
time, place and detailed information regarding the proposals to be
presented at the 2024 Annual Meeting will be as set forth in the
Company's definitive proxy statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Because the scheduled date of the 2024 Annual Meeting is more than
30 days after the anniversary of the Company's 2023 annual meeting
of stockholders, prior disclosed deadlines regarding the submission
of stockholder proposals for the 2024 Annual Meeting are no longer
applicable. The Company is hereby providing notice of certain
revised deadlines for the submission of stockholder proposals in
connection with the 2024 Annual Meeting.
Stockholders who intend to present proposals for inclusion in the
Company's proxy materials for the 2024 Annual Meeting pursuant to
Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, must ensure that such proposals are received by the
Company, in writing, at 951 Yamato Road, Suite 220, Boca Raton, FL
33431, and be directed to the attention of the Corporate Secretary,
no later than September 30, 2024, which the Company has determined
to be a reasonable time before it expects to begin to print and
send its proxy materials for the 2024 Annual Meeting, and must
furthermore comply with all applicable SEC rules, including the
applicable requirements of Rule 14a-8.
To be considered timely, stockholders who intend to present
proposals for director nominations or any other proposal at the
2024 Annual Meeting must provide notice in writing to the Company
at 951 Yamato Road, Suite 220, Boca Raton, FL 33431, and be
directed to the attention of the Corporate Secretary, no later than
the close of business on September 30, 2024, the tenth calendar day
following September 20, 2024, the date of the Current Report on
Form 8-K publicly announcing the date of the 2024 Annual Meeting.
Stockholders are advised to review the Company's bylaws, as
amended, which contain additional requirements regarding advance
notice of stockholder proposals and director nominations.
About TherapeuticsMD Inc.
TherapeuticsMD Inc. was previously a women's healthcare company
with a mission of creating and commercializing innovative products
to support the lifespan of women from pregnancy prevention through
menopause. In December 2022, the Company changed its business to
become a pharmaceutical royalty company, primarily collecting
royalties from its licensees. The Company is no longer engaging in
research and development or commercial operations.
West Palm Beach, Fla.-based Berkowitz Pollack Brant, Advisors +
CPAs, the Company's auditor since 2023, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated March 29, 2024, citing that the
Company's recent change in operations and negative cash flow
position along with other conditions, raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
TherapeuticsMD has incurred recurring net losses, including net
losses of $10.3 million and $172.4 million for 2023 and 2021,
respectively. As of June 30, 2024, TherapeuticsMD had $4.1 million
in total assets, $12.5 million in total liabilities, and $27.7
million in total stockholders' equity.
TRP BRANDS: Seeks to Hire HyperAMS LLC as Consultant
----------------------------------------------------
TRP Brands LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Illinois to employ HyperAMS, LLC as
consultant.
The firm's services include:
a. procuring, at Debtors' cost and expense, sign packages to
be used in the stores if Debtors so desires;
b. recommending appropriate point-of-sale and external
advertising for the Stores;
c. recommending on a weekly basis appropriate discounting of
and pricing of merchandise, and, if requested by Debtors,
appropriate commission, bonus and incentive programs for the
stores' employees;
d. overseeing initial display and signing of multiple stores
during the first week of the sale, which Debtors will utilize as a
guide in setting up its other stores for the sale;
e. developing sales and expense budgets prior to the kick off
the sale, and update such periodically throughout the sale for
discussion with the Debtors;
f. evaluating sales of merchandise by category and providing
liquidation level sales reporting in total on a daily basis;
g. working with Debtors to develop the optimal level of
additional inventory to purchase for the sale to be procured by
Debtors during the course of the sale;
h. participating in weekly conference calls with Debtors'
management to discuss the progress of the sale and the need to
implement updated discounts and strategies;
i. maintaining the confidentiality of all proprietary or
non-public information regarding Debtors of which HyperAMS or its
representatives become aware, except for information that is public
as of the date hereof or becomes public through no fault of
Consultant; and
j. providing such other related services deemed necessary or
appropriate by Debtors and HyperAMS.
The firm will charge a fixed fee equal to $130,000 for its work
during the Sale, with $32,500 of the fixed fee paid within 48 hours
of the date of the latter to occur of (i) the Court docketing its
order approving this engagement, or (ii) the Debtors signing of
this Agreement, and the balance billed ratably and paid on a weekly
basis with the start date of the store closing sales and the end
date initially set for December 31, 2024, and (b) a variable fee
equal to one tenth of 1 percent of all sales revenue generated
during the Sale, which variable fee shall be billed and paid on a
weekly basis during the course of the engagement.
Robert Pabst, a partner at HyperAMS, LLC, disclosed in a court
filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Robert Pabst
HyperAMS, LLC
980 Carnegie Street
Rolling Meadows, IL 60008
Tel: (847) 499-7033
About TRP Brands LLC
TRP Brands, LLC and The RoomPlace Furniture & Mattress, LLC filed
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Lead Case No. 24-01529) on
Feb. 2, 2024. Valerie Berman-Knight, president, signed the
petitions.
At the time of the filing, TRP Brands reported up to $50,000 in
assets and $50 million to $100 million in liabilities while
RoomPlace reported up to $50,000 in assets and $100 million to $500
million in liabilities.
Judge Deborah L. Thorne oversees the cases.
E. Philip Groben, Esq., at Gensburg Calandriello & Kanter, P.C., is
the Debtors' legal counsel.
The U.S. Trustee for Region 11 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in these Chapter 11 cases. The committee tapped
FisherBroyles, LLP as its legal counsel.
TUPPERWARE BRANDS: Plan Standoff Delays Door-to-Door Workers Pay
----------------------------------------------------------------
Steven Church of Bloomberg News reports that Tupperware Brands'
first day in bankruptcy court hit a sour note as the 78-year-old
company that's synonymous with storing leftovers was forced to
delay paying 465,000 door-to-door contractors because of a spat
with lenders.
According to Bloomberg News, the standoff threatens to quash
Tupperware's revival plans before the company has a chance to hold
a court-supervised auction designed to attract investors willing to
save the money-losing business. That's because Tupperware has only
$7.4 million in cash, but it can't spend any of it without approval
from lenders. It owes its traveling contractors $1.4 million in
commissions.
About Tupperware Brands
Tupperware Brands Corporation (NYSE: TUP) --
https://www.tupperwarebrands.com/ -- is a global consumer products
company that designs innovative, functional, and environmentally
responsible products. Founded in 1946, Tupperware's signature
container created the modern food storage category that
revolutionized the way the world stores, serves, and prepares food.
Today, this iconic brand has more than 8,500 functional design and
utility patents for solution-oriented kitchen and home products.
The company distributes its products into nearly 70 countries,
primarily through independent representatives around the world.
Tupperware Brands sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 24-12166) on Sept. 17,
2024. In the bankruptcy petition, Tupperware reported more than
$1.2 billion in total debts and $679.5 million in total assets.
Kirkland & Ellis LLP is serving as legal advisor to Tupperware,
Moelis & Company LLC is serving as the Company's investment banker,
and Alvarez & Marsal is serving as the Company's financial and
restructuring advisor. Epiq is the claims agent and has put up the
page https://dm.epiq11.com/Tupperware
UETEK: Amended Plan Clarifies Payroll Tax Claims Pay
----------------------------------------------------
UETEK submitted a Fourth Amended (Revised) Subchapter V Plan of
Reorganization dated August 22, 2024.
The revisions made to the Revised Plan include:
* Section 2.1 of the Plan (page 12) has been revised to
provide clarity regarding the status of the payroll tax claim filed
by the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS"), Proof of Claim 1.1,
and the payroll tax claims filed by the California Employment
Development Department (the "EDD"), Proof Claims 4.1 and 10.1. As
these revisions indicate, the Debtor filed objections to Proofs of
Claim 1.1 and 10.1. Proof of Claim 1.1 includes estimates of
payroll tax claims based upon the assumption that the Debtor
continued to run payrolls after June 30, 2023. It did not. Proof of
Claim 10.1 is also based upon this erroneous assumption. In the
objection, the Debtor asks the Court to reduce the allowed amount
of Proof of claim to 1.1 to $821.89, which is the second quarter
2023 balance claimed due. This objection seeks the disallowance of
Proof of Claim 10.1 in its entirety. The EDD's Proof of Claim 4.1
is not subject to objection (2nd Q 2023 taxes). The resolution of
these claim objections will not affect the viability of the Plan.
* Section 2.3 of the Plan has been modified to incorporate the
revision requested by the Court at the status conference held on
August 6, 2024, at 3:00 p.m. As revised, Section 2.3 advises the
Court and the creditors that all objections to filed proofs of
claim have been filed, and no further objections will be filed by
the Debtor unless a new proof of claim is filed, or an existing
claim is amended.
* A typo was corrected on page 7 of the Plan.
A full-text copy of the Fourth Amended (Revised) Subchapter V Plan
dated August 22, 2024 is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=1b1PmO from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.
Counsel to the Debtor:
Sean A. O'Keefe, Esq.
OKEEFE & ASSOCIATES LAW CORPORATION, P.C.
30 Newport Center Dr
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Phone: (949) 334-4135
About Uetek
Uetek is a wholesaler of grocery and related products. The Debtor
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 23-14201) on September 14, 2023. In the
petition signed by Hsiang Woodby, chief executive officer,
secretary, chief financial officer, the Debtor disclosed $779,202
in assets and $1,976,556 in liabilities.
Judge Wayne Johnson oversees the case.
Sean A. O'Keefe, Esq., at O'Keefe & Associates Law Corporation, PC,
represents the Debtor as legal counsel.
ULTRACUTS OF AMERICA: Seeks Court Approval to Use Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ultracuts of America, Inc. asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida for authority to use cash collateral
retroactive to September 13.
Ultracuts intends to use cash, accounts receivable and other income
generated from its operations, which constitute cash collateral of
its secured creditors including U.S. Small Business Administration
(SBA). About $11,150 in assets are available as cash collateral.
This cash collateral is necessary to fund Ultracuts' operating
expenses and administration costs during its Chapter 11
proceedings, according to its attorney, Buddy D. Ford, Esq.
Ultracuts will use the secured creditors' cash collateral in
accordance with its proposed budget.
To provide adequate protection to secured creditors, Ultracuts
offers post-petition replacement liens on its assets, the right for
creditors to inspect these assets with prior notice, and access to
monthly financial documents.
A court hearing is scheduled for Oct. 3.
About Ultracuts of America
Ultracuts of America, Inc. is a salon services provider based in
Tampa, Fla.
Ultracuts sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 24-05468) on Sept. 13, 2024, with
$100,001 to $500,000 in both assets and liabilities. Ultracuts
President Eric Young signed the petition.
Judge Roberta A. Colton presides over the case.
Buddy D. Ford, Esq., represents the Debtor as legal counsel.
VAPOTHERM INC: Closes Merger With Perceptive Advisors
-----------------------------------------------------
Vapotherm, Inc. announced on September 20, 2024, that it has closed
its merger with a newly-formed entity organized and funded by an
affiliate of Perceptive Advisors, LLC.
On June 17, 2024, the Company announced that it had signed a
definitive agreement and plan of merger with a newly-formed entity
organized and funded by an affiliate of Perceptive Advisors, LLC, a
leading health care investment firm, and its Perceptive Discovery
Fund. Concurrently with the entry into the definitive agreement and
plan of merger, the Company's existing lender, investment
affiliates managed by SLR Capital Partners agreed to convert
approximately $83 million of term debt into preferred equity of the
newly-formed entity, and Perceptive would invest $50 million of new
preferred equity capital into the business, a portion of which
would be used to fund the merger consideration and make certain
closing-related payments. SLR would retain $40 million of term debt
post-closing.
Effective as of the closing of the merger, trading of Vapotherm's
common stock has been suspended on OTCQX, and Vapotherm has
requested that its common stock be delisted from OTCQX.
Cooley LLP acted as legal counsel to Perceptive and Latham &
Watkins LLP acted as legal counsel to SLR. Scalar, LLC acted as
financial advisor to the Special Committee and Ropes & Gray LLP
acted as legal counsel to the Company.
A full-text copy of the Company's report filed on Form 8-K with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is available at:
https://tinyurl.com/bds8ps76
About Vapotherm
Vapotherm, Inc. (OTCQX: VAPO) -- www.vapotherm.com -- is a publicly
traded developer and manufacturer of advanced respiratory
technology based in Exeter, New Hampshire, USA. The Company
develops innovative, comfortable, non-invasive technologies for
respiratory support of patients with chronic or acute breathing
disorders. Over 4.4 million patients have been treated with the use
of Vapotherm high velocity therapy systems.
Vapotherm reported a net loss of $14.84 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2024, compared to a net loss of $18.09
million for the three months ended March 31, 2023. As of March 31,
2024, the Company had $71.91 million in total assets, $140.39
million in total liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of
$68.48 million.
New York, New York-based Grant Thornton LLP, the Company's auditor
since 2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated Feb. 22, 2024, citing that the Company incurred a net loss of
$58.2 million and generated a cash flow deficit from operations of
$24.3 million during the year ended Dec. 31, 2023, and as of that
date, the Company had stockholders' deficit of $55.3 million. These
conditions, along with other matters, raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
* * *
This concludes the Troubled Company Reporter's coverage of
Vapotherm until facts and circumstances, if any, emerge that
demonstrate financial or operational strain or difficulty at a
level sufficient to warrant renewed coverage.
VISION CAPITAL: Hires Theodore N. Stapleton P.C. as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Vision Capital Holdings, Ltd, Co. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia to employ
Theodore N. Stapleton P.C. as counsel.
The firm will provide these services:
a. advise the Debtor generally regarding matters of bankruptcy
law;
b. prepare and assist in the preparation of pleadings,
exhibits, applications, reports, and accounting in connection with
the Debtor's schedules, and other documents necessary to the
administration of these proceedings;
c. investigate, analyze and evaluate potential claims of the
estate, including claims for recovery of avoidable transfers under
the Bankruptcy Code;
d. advise the Debtor concerning Chapter 11 plans and
alternatives thereto;
e. represent the Debtor at hearings and conferences with
regard to administration of this case and any of the foregoing
matters and prepare pleadings and papers in connection therewith;
and
f. represent and assist the Debtor with regard to any and all
other matters relating to administration of the case.
The firm will be paid at these rates:
Theodore N. Stapleton $600 per hour
Attorneys $200 to $600 per hour
Paralegals and Project Assistants $50 to $75 per hour
The Debtor paid the firm a retainer of $12,000.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
Theodore N. Stapleton, Esq., a partner at Theodore N. Stapleton,
P.C., disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.
The firm can be reached at:
Theodore N. Stapleton, Esq.
Theodore N. Stapleton, P.C.
2802 Paces Ferry Road SE, Suite 100-B
Atlanta, GA 30339
Tel: (770) 436-3334
Email: tstaple@tstaple.com
About Vision Capital Holdings, Ltd, Co.
Vision Capital Holdings Ltd. Co. sought relief under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 24-59271) on
September 3, 2024. In the petition signed by Julia Burton, as
managing member, the Debtor reports estimated assets and
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million each.
The Debtor is represented by Theodore N. Stapleton, Esq. of
THEODORE N. STAPLETON, PC.
WARHORSE SH WEST: Case Summary & 16 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Warhorse SH West Retail, LLC
231 Public Square, Suite 300
Franklin, TN 37064
Business Description: Warhorse SH West is a Single Asset Real
Estate debtor (as defined in 11 U.S.C.
Section 101(51B)).
Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 25, 2024
Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
Middle District of Tennessee
Case No.: 24-03688
Judge: Hon. Nancy B King
Debtor's Counsel: Gray Waldron, Esq.
DUNHAM HILDEBRAND PAYNE WALDRON, PLLC
9020 Overlook Blvd, Ste 316
Brentwood, TN 37027
Tel: 629-777-6519
Fax: 615-777-3765
Email: gray@dhnashville.com
Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000
Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million
The petition was signed by Wm. Eric Kaehr as president.
A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 16 unsecured creditors is available for free
at PacerMonitor.com at:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/YHGFULI/Warhorse_SH_West_Retail_LLC__tnmbke-24-03688__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA
WISA TECHNOLOGIES: Gregory Castaldo Holds 8.6% Equity Stake
-----------------------------------------------------------
Gregory Castaldo disclosed in a Schedule 13G Report filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that as of September 10,
2024, he beneficially owned 640,046 shares of WiSA Technologies
Inc.'s common stock, representing 8.6%, based on 7,412,943 shares
of Common Stock of the Company outstanding after the closing of the
Warrant Exchange and Inducement Agreement of shares of Common Stock
of the Company, as verified with the Company on September 16,
2024.
A full-text copy of Mr. Gregory Castaldo's SEC Report is available
at:
https://tinyurl.com/48kdmbwz
About WiSA Technologies
WiSA Technologies Inc. -- www.wisatechnologies.com -- develops and
markets spatial audio wireless technology for smart devices and
home entertainment systems. The Company's WiSA Association
collaborates with consumer electronics companies, technology
providers, retailers, and industry partners to promote high-quality
spatial audio experiences. WiSA E is the Company's proprietary
technology for seamless integration across platforms and devices.
As of June 30, 2024, WiSA Technologies had $10.6 million in total
assets, $4.2 million in total liabilities, and $6.4 million in
total stockholders' equity.
San Jose, California-based BPM LLP, the Company's auditor since
2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 1, 2024. The report cited recurring losses from operations, a
net capital deficiency, available cash, and cash used in operations
as factors raising substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.
WISA TECHNOLOGIES: Joseph Reda Holds 8.9% Equity Stake
------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Reda disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A Report filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that as of September 20,
2024, he beneficially owned 665,276 shares of WiSA Technologies
Inc.'s common stock, representing 8.9%, based on 7,412,943 shares
of Common Stock of the Company outstanding after the closing of the
Warrant Exchange and Inducement Agreement of shares of Common Stock
of the Company, as verified with the Company on September 16,
2024.
A full-text copy of Mr. Joseph Reda's SEC Report is available at:
https://tinyurl.com/2sxkr8vu
About WiSA Technologies
WiSA Technologies Inc. -- www.wisatechnologies.com -- develops and
markets spatial audio wireless technology for smart devices and
home entertainment systems. The Company's WiSA Association
collaborates with consumer electronics companies, technology
providers, retailers, and industry partners to promote high-quality
spatial audio experiences. WiSA E is the Company's proprietary
technology for seamless integration across platforms and devices.
As of June 30, 2024, WiSA Technologies had $10.6 million in total
assets, $4.2 million in total liabilities, and $6.4 million in
total stockholders' equity.
San Jose, California-based BPM LLP, the Company's auditor since
2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 1, 2024. The report cited recurring losses from operations, a
net capital deficiency, available cash, and cash used in operations
as factors raising substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.
WORKSPORT LTD: Inks Securities Purchase Deal With Keyser Capital
----------------------------------------------------------------
Worksport Ltd. disclosed in a Form 8-K Report filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission that it entered into a
securities purchase agreement with Keyser Capital LLC, a Cooks
Islands limited liability company.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company has agreed to issue
and sell, in a private placement (i) 950,000 shares of the
Company's common stock, with a par value of $0.0001 per share, to
the Purchaser at a $0.40 per share purchase price, and (ii)
warrants to purchase up to 1,900,000 shares of common stock, at an
exercise price of $0.40 per share. The warrants will be exercisable
for a period of five year from the date of issuance. The Purchase
Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and
covenants of the parties, and the closing is subject to customary
closing conditions.
The Purchaser acknowledged and agreed that any resale of the Common
Shares or Warrant Shares issued in connection with this Private
Placement is subject to resale restrictions pursuant to the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and none of the Common Shares or
Warrant Shares purchased herein has been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
About Worksport Ltd.
West Seneca, N.Y.-based Worksport Ltd., through its subsidiaries,
designs, develops, manufactures, and owns intellectual property on
a portfolio of tonneau cover, solar integration, portable power
station, and NP (Non-Parasitic), Hydrogen-based green energy
products and solutions for the automotive aftermarket accessories,
power storage, residential heating, and electric vehicle-charging
industries.
Going Concern
The Company cautioned in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarter ended
March 31, 2024, that there is substantial doubt about its ability
to continue as a going concern. As of March 31, 2024, the Company
had $3,536,980 in cash and cash equivalents. The Company has
generated only limited revenues and has relied primarily upon
capital generated from public and private offerings of its
securities. Since the Company's acquisition of Worksport in fiscal
year 2014, it has never generated a profit.
As of June 30, 2024, Worksport had $27,185,498 in total assets,
$8,039,405 in total liabilities, and $19,146,093 in total
stockholders' equity.
WRENA LLC: Seeks Court OK of $650,000 Northstar DIP Loan
--------------------------------------------------------
Wrena, LLC asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District
of Michigan for authority to obtain financing from Northstar Bank
and use the lender's cash collateral to get the company through
bankruptcy.
The company needs the financing to stave off an imminent
liquidation and the loss of approximately 50 jobs if it ceases
operations, according to Scott Wolfson, Esq., the company's
attorney.
The debtor-in-possession financing, if approved by the court, would
allow Wrena to borrow up to $650,000, with a maximum term running
until a projected sale closing by January 30, 2025. This financing
would not involve cross-collateralization.
Meanwhile, Wrena has prepared a 13-week cash forecast, which shows
a need for approximately $447,000 of Northstar's cash collateral in
the immediate future to cover operating expenses.
Northstar is the only lender willing to provide financing under
reasonable terms, according to Mr. Wolfson.
In terms of protection for the lender, Wrena asked the court to
recognize the lender's rights to credit bid in any asset sales by
the company and grant the lender liens in all property to secure
the company's obligations to the lender.
As of the petition date, Wrena has an outstanding debt of
approximately $4.56 million to Northstar. This debt is secured by a
first-priority lien on the company's personal property.
Northstar is represented by:
Sandra S. Hamilton, Esq.
Clark Hill PLC
200 Ottawa NW, Suite 500
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
Email: shamilton@clarkhill.com
- and -
Jennifer K. Green, Esq.
Clark Hill PLC
220 Park Street, Suite 200
Birmingham, MI 48009
Email: jgreen@clarkhill.com
About Wrena LLC
Wrena, LLC is a Tier 1 and Tier 2 automotive supplier in Tipp City,
Ohio.
The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 24-49047) on September
23, 2024, with $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities. Scott Eisenberg, chief restructuring officer, signed
the petition.
Judge Maria L. Oxholm oversees the case.
Wolfson Bolton Kochis PLL, Cascade Partners LLC and DWH Corp. serve
as the Debtor's legal counsel, investment banker and financial
advisor, respectively. Scott Eisenberg of DWH is the chief
restructuring officer.
WYNN RESORTS: Units Issue $800 Million Senior Notes Due 2033
------------------------------------------------------------
Wynn Resorts, Limited disclosed in a Form 8-K Report filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that Wynn Resorts Finance,
LLC and its subsidiary, Wynn Resorts Capital Corp., each an
indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, issued $800
million aggregate principal amount of 6.250% Senior Notes due 2033.
The Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated as of
September 20, 2024, among the Issuers, the guarantors party thereto
and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as trustee . The
Notes were offered and sold in reliance on exemptions from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. The Notes will mature on March 15, 2033. Interest is
payable in cash semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each
year, beginning on March 15, 2025.
The net proceeds of this offering were used to redeem in full Wynn
Las Vegas, LLC and Wynn Las Vegas Capital Corp.'s outstanding
5.500% Senior Notes due 2025, to pay fees and expenses related to
the redemption and for general corporate purposes.
The Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by all of WRF's
domestic subsidiaries that guarantee the Issuers' existing senior
secured credit facilities, except Wynn Resorts Capital, which is
the co-issuer of the Notes, the Issuers' 5.125% senior notes due
2029 and the Issuers' 7.125% senior notes due 2031.
The Issuers may redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at any time
or from time to time prior to September 15, 2027 at a redemption
price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes
to be redeemed, plus a "make-whole" amount set forth in the
Indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not
including, the redemption date.
On or after September 15, 2027, the Issuers may redeem the Notes,
in whole or in part, at the redemption prices set forth in the
Indenture plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Notes are subject
to disposition and redemption requirements imposed by gaming laws
and regulations of applicable gaming regulatory authorities.
The Indenture contains covenants that limit the ability of the
Issuers and the guarantors to, among other things, (1) enter into
sale-leaseback transactions, (2) create or incur liens to secure
debt, and (3) merge, consolidate or sell all or substantially all
of the Issuers' assets. These covenants are subject to exceptions
and qualifications set forth in the Indenture.
In the event of a change of control triggering event, the Issuers
must offer to repurchase the Notes at a repurchase price equal to
101% of the aggregate principal amount thereof plus any accrued and
unpaid interest, to, but not including, the repurchase date.
The Indenture also contains customary events of default, including
(1) failure to make required payments, (2) failure to comply with
certain covenants, (3) failure to pay certain other indebtedness,
(4) certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency, and (5) failure to
pay certain judgments. An event of default under the Indenture
allows either the Trustee or the holders of at least 25% in
aggregate principal amount of the Notes, as applicable, issued
under such Indenture to accelerate the amounts due under the Notes,
or in the case of a bankruptcy or insolvency, will automatically
cause the acceleration of the amounts due under the Notes.
About Wynn Resorts Ltd.
Headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada, Wynn Resorts, Limited owns and
operates hotels and casino resorts. As of Dec. 31, 2023, Wynn
Resorts had $14 billion in total assets, $15.1 billion in total
liabilities, and $1.1 billion in total stockholders' deficit.
* * *
Egan-Jones Ratings Company, on January 31, 2024, maintained its
'CCC+' foreign currency and local currency senior unsecured ratings
on debt issued by Wynn Resorts, Limited.
[*] Charles Persons Joins Paul Hastings's Restructuring Practice
----------------------------------------------------------------
Further strengthening its market-leading financial restructuring
practice and continuing its strategic expansion in Texas, Paul
Hastings LLP has added restructuring lawyer Charles Persons as a
partner in Dallas. The firm has more than tripled its Texas
headcount in the last year and expects to have more than 100
lawyers in the Lone Star State by Q1 2025, up from 25.
Persons represents debtors and creditors in complex domestic and
cross-border matters ranging from Chapter 11 cases and out-of-court
reorganizations and financings to distressed acquisitions and
debtor-in-possession financings, as well as diverse bankruptcy
litigation matters, including appellate litigation. His practice
also includes significant private equity borrower and company-side
work. He joins from Sidley Austin LLP.
"Charles is a strong addition to our preeminent restructuring
group, as we expand the practice and our broader platform in
Texas," said firm Chair Frank Lopez. "His extensive restructuring
experience, coupled with his private equity borrower and
company-side work, will be valuable for existing and new clients
across diverse industries as we continue to gain market share at
the top of the market."
Persons' numerous high-profile representations include New
Residential Investment Corp., in its bid for the mortgage-related
businesses of Ditech Holding, and multiple out-of-court distressed
oil and gas acquisitions. His multinational restructuring
experience spans sectors ranging from retail and aviation to
automobile and manufacturing, with considerable experience in the
oil and gas industry and clients including Ares Management, Huron
Consulting Group, K2 HealthVentures, MHR Fund Management,
Mockingbird Credit Partners, Morgan Stanley Energy Partners, and
Presidio Petroleum.
"I'm thrilled to join Paul Hastings and an exceptional team that
has established itself as one of the world's strongest
restructuring groups," said Persons. "I look forward to
collaborating with the many talented lawyers across practices in
Texas and beyond, and to helping the firm continue its growth
trajectory while also introducing its leading global platform to my
clients."
Persons is the latest to join the powerhouse Paul Hastings
financial restructuring platform, which has leaped to the top of
the market by adding premier partners and teams, including:
* an elite 43-lawyer group from Stroock led by practice
co-chairs Kris Hansen and Jayme Goldstein;
* a top-ranked 11-partner, 20-lawyer team of restructuring,
private credit, and special situations lawyers from King & Spalding
in New York, Chicago, and Houston;
* restructuring and special situations partner David Hong from
Kirkland & Ellis in New York;
* London-based restructuring partners Will Needham and Helena
Potts, who joined from KKR & Co., Inc. and the former Shearman &
Sterling, respectively, as well as partners Jessica Ling and Tom
McKay; and
* Paris-based restructuring partner Caroline Texier.
The firm's restructuring practice earned three "Deal of the Year"
accolades at M&A Advisor's 2024 Turnaround Awards and advised on
five matters recognized by Turnarounds & Workouts as "Successful
Restructurings of 2023." Lawyers in the practice advise on many of
the world's most complex high-profile matters, including
representing the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in the
Chapter 11 proceedings for FTX and WeWork, advising lenders in the
$1.2 billion in-court restructuring of Pennsylvania Real Estate
Investment Trust (PREIT), advising an ad hoc group of crossover
lenders on the $8.8 billion in-court restructuring of Diamond
Sports, and advising term lenders on the $4.3 billion out-of-court
restructuring of Travelport.
In rapidly building a formidable Texas presence, Paul Hastings has
attracted top-tier talent, including:
* an elite eight-partner, 25-lawyer finance team from Vinson &
Elkins LLP in Dallas and Houston;
* the three-partner, seven-lawyer Chambers-ranked corporate team
of David Elder, Chris Centrich, and Patrick Hurley from Akin Gump
Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP in Houston;
* Chambers-ranked cybersecurity and litigation partner Michelle
Reed, also from Akin, in Dallas;
* trial and regulatory enforcement partner Manuel Berrelez from
Vinson & Elkins and tax partner Alex Farr from McDermott Will &
Emery, both in Dallas;
complex commercial litigator Paul Genender, chair of the firm's
Texas litigation practice and co-chair of the Dallas and Houston
offices, from Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP.
About Paul Hastings
With widely recognized elite teams in finance, mergers &
acquisitions, private equity, restructuring and special situations,
litigation, employment, and real estate, Paul Hastings is a premier
law firm providing intellectual capital and superior execution
globally to the world's leading investment banks, asset managers,
and corporations.
[] BOOK REVIEW: Dynamics of Institutional Change
------------------------------------------------
Dynamics of Institutional Change: The Hospital in Transition
Authors: Milton Greenblatt, Myron Sharaf, and Evelyn M. Stone
Publisher: Beard Books
Softcover: 288 pages
List Price: $34.95
Review by Henry Berry
Order your personal copy today at
http://beardbooks.com/beardbooks/dynamics_of_institutional_change.html
Like many other private-sector and public institutions in modern
society, hospitals are regularly undergoing change. The three
authors of this volume have been leaders in change at Boston State
Hospital, a large public mental hospital, that serves as the test
case for the experienced advice and hard-earned lessons found in
this work.
With their academic and professional backgrounds, the three authors
combined offer an incomparable fund of knowledge and experience for
the reader. In keeping with their positions, they focus on the
position and the role of the leaders of institutional change. They
do not recommend any particular choices, direction, or outcome.
They do not presume to know what is the best for all institutions,
or to understand the culture, realities, goals, or values of all
institutions. They do not even presume to know what is best or
desirable for hospitals, the institution with which they are most
familiar. Instead, the authors direct their attention to "the
problems hampering change and the gains and losses of one or
another strategy of change." In relation to this, they are "more
concerned with the study of process than with outcome." By not
recommending specific policies or arguing for specific values or
goals, the authors make their book relevant to all institutions
involved in change, but particularly public-health institutions.
All of the subjects are dealt with from the perspective of top
executives and administrators. Among the subjects taken up are not
only the staff and structure of the institution, specifically the
medical institution, but also consultants, volunteers, local
communities, and state and federal government agencies. The detail
given to each subject goes beyond the administrator's relationship
to it to discussion concerning the relationship of lower-level
employees with the subject. This relationship of lower-level
employees has everything to do with how change occurs within the
institution, and often whether it occurs. The authors go into such
detail because they understand that the performance and goals of
top administrators are affected by everything that goes on within
heir institution, and often by much that goes on outside of it.
For example, the authors begin the subject of volunteers by
defining three types of volunteers: volunteers from organizations,
student or independent volunteers, and government-appointed or
statutory volunteers. Volunteers of whatever type can cause
anxiety, resistance, and even resentment among regular staff of an
institution. Volunteers are not simply "free help," but require
administration, training, and oversight -- which can distract
regular employees from work they consider more important and
interesting, and use up departments' resources. The transitional
nature of volunteers, their ignorance of institutional and
occupational concerns of the regular staff, and their lack of
professionalism can cause disruptions and personnel problems in
parts of an institution. The authors advise the top administrators,
"The intrusive evangelism of student volunteers can be threatening
not only to professional supervisors, but to the entire hospital
staff as well, from the attendant to the top administrator." While
recognizing the problems which may be caused by volunteers,
especially younger ones, the authors point out the worth of
volunteers to the hospital despite the potential problems they
bring. Overall, the different types of volunteers "improve the
physical and social environment" of the workplace, "make direct and
beneficial contacts with chronic patients," and often "establish
true innovations." After discussing the pros and cons of volunteers
and providing detailed guidance on how to manage volunteers so as
to minimize potential problems, the authors advise the
administrator and his or her staff how to regard volunteers. "Both
staff and administrator must constantly keep in mind that
volunteers are not personally helping them [word in italics in
original], but are helping the patients or the community." Along
with the technical management and administrative guidance, such
counsel is clearly relevant and important in keeping perspective on
the matter of volunteers.
The treatment of volunteers in a medical institution exemplifies
the comprehensive, empathetic, and experienced treatment of all the
subjects. Personnel -- whether professional, clerical, service, or
volunteer -- is obviously a major concern of any institution and
change in it. The structure of an institution is another crucial
concern. This is addressed under the heading "decentralization
through unitization." In the context of a large public medical
facility, decentralization "involves breaking up the institution
into semiautonomous units . . . ; each of which is like a small
community health center in that it is responsible for serving a
specific part of the community." As with the subject of volunteers,
the authors treat this subject of the structure of the institution
by examining its various sides, discussing related personnel and
administrative matters, relating instructive anecdotes from their
own experience, and in the end, offering relevant and practical
advice and actions whose sense is apparent to the reader by this
point.
Recognizing that the authors have faced many of the same
situations, decisions, pressures, challenges, and aims as they
have, top hospital and public-health administrators will no doubt
adopt many of the authors' recommendations for managing the process
of change. The content of the book as well as its style (which is
obviously meant to be helpful, sympathetic, and realistic) offers
the reader not only resolutions, but also encouragement. The top
hospital administrators and their staff, who are the main audience
for "Dynamics of Institutional Change," will not find a better
study and handbook to help them through the changes their
institutions are being called upon to undergo to deal with the
health concerns and problems of today's society.
Milton Greenblatt, M.D. was Commissioner of the Massachusetts
Department of Mental Health, Professor of Psychiatry at Tufts
University School of Medicine, and Lecturer in Psychiatry at
Harvard Medical School and Boston University School of Medicine.
Myron R. Sharaf, Ph. D. was Associate Area Director of Boston State
Hospital and Assistant Professor of Psychology at Tufts University
School of Medicine.
Evelyn M. Stone served as Executive Editor for the Massachusetts
Department of Mental Health.
*********
Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par. Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable. Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate. The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication. Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades. Prices for actual
trades are probably different. Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind. It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.
Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets. At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled. Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets. A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize. The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.
On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts. The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.
Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals. All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com. Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.
Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.
The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.
TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.
*********
S U B S C R I P T I O N I N F O R M A T I O N
Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa., USA.
Randy Antoni, Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante,
Rousel Elaine Tumanda, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Psyche A. Castillon,
Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and
Peter A. Chapman, Editors.
Copyright 2024. All rights reserved. ISSN: 1520-9474.
This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers. Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.
The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.
*** End of Transmission ***