THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED September 30,
2002 AND 2001
Quarter Quarter
Ended Ended
($ in millions, except per share amounts) 9/30/02 9/30/01
REVENUES:
Sales and services $2,138 $1,845
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of sales and services 1,548 1,362
Selling, general and
administrative expenses 12 17
Total operating costs and expenses 1,560
1,379
OPERATING INCOME 578 466
OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE):
Interest expense, net (473) (382)
Other expense, net (210) (10)
Equity in earnings (loss)
of affiliates
(before income tax) (20) (23)
Nonrecurring severance and transaction costs - (37)
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
AND MINORITY INTEREST (125) 14
Income tax benefit (46) (1)
Minority interest expense 20 9
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING
OPERATIONS (99) 6
Loss from operations of
discontinued components
(net of income taxes of
$3 and $2, respectively) (215) (3)
NET INCOME (LOSS) $(314) $3
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
$(0.18) $0.01
Discontinued operations (0.40) -
Total $(0.58) $0.01
Diluted weighted average
shares outstanding
(in millions) 542 537
THE AES CORPORATION ---
Supplemental Schedule
Reconciliation of GAAP Net income (loss) before discontinued
operations to Net
income excluding Brazil, Argentina and Venezuela
foreign currency
effects, effects of FAS No. 133 and nonrecurring
items.
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED September 30,
2002 AND 2001
($ in millions, except per
share amounts)
Quarter
ended Quarter ended
9/30/2002
9/30/2001
Amount Amount Amount Amount
per per
share share
Net income (loss)
before discontinued
operations $(99)
$(0.18) $6 $0.01
South America foreign
currency transaction
losses, net(1) 182 0.33
82 0.15
Mark to market losses
from FAS No. 133 (2) 9
0.02 39 0.07
Transaction and
severance costs related
to IPALCO transaction - - 24 0.05
Net income from recurring
operations $92
$0.17 $151 $0.28
Diluted weighted average
shares outstanding
(in millions) 542 542
(1) South America
foreign currency transaction losses, net, consist of
the following in
2002: a loss of approximately $203 million after
income tax, or $0.37
per share, from Brazil, and a gain of
approximately $21
million after income tax, or $0.04 per share, from
Venezuela. For 2001,
South America foreign currency transaction losses
consist of a loss of
approximately $82 million after income tax, or
$0.15 per share, from
Brazil.
(2) Mark to market
losses from FAS No. 133 consist of the following in
2002: a loss of
approximately $22 million after income tax, or $0.04
per share, from
interest rate instruments, a gain of approximately $8
million after income
tax, or $0.01 per share, from foreign exchange
rate instruments, and
a gain of $5 million after income tax, or $0.01
per share, from
commodity contracts. For 2001, mark to market losses
from FAS No. 133
consist of the following: a loss of approximately $31
million after income
tax, or $0.06 per share, from interest rate
instruments, a gain
of approximately $1 million after income tax from
foreign exchange rate
instruments, and a loss of approximately $9
million after income
tax, or $0.01 per share, from commodity
contracts.
THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED September
30, 2002 AND 2001
Nine Months Nine Months
Ended Ended
9/30/02 9/30/01
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
REVENUES:
Sales and services
$6,498 $5,806
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of sales and services 4,782
4,251
Selling, general and
administrative expenses 68 73
Total operating costs and expenses 4,850 4,324
OPERATING INCOME 1,648 1,482
OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE):
Interest expense, net
(1,285) (1,025)
Other income (expense), net (276)
21
Equity in earnings of
affiliates (before income tax) 36 126
Loss on sale or write-down of
investments (116) -
Nonrecurring severance and
transaction costs - (131)
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
AND MINORITY INTEREST
7 473
Income tax provision 42 141
Minority interest (income)
expense (11) 65
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING
OPERATIONS (24) 267
Loss from operations of
discontinued components
(net of income taxes of $15
and $18, respectively) (373) (38)
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CUMULATIVE
EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE (397)
229
Cumulative effect of accounting
change (net of income taxes of $72) (346) -
NET INCOME (LOSS)
$(743) $229
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Income
(loss) from continuing
operations $(0.04) $0.50
Discontinued operations (0.69)
(0.07)
Cumulative effect of
accounting change (0.65) -
Total
$(1.38) $0.43
Diluted weighted average
shares outstanding (in millions) 537
538
THE AES CORPORATION ---
Supplemental Schedule
Reconciliation
of GAAP Net income (loss) before discontinued
operations and
accounting change to Net income excluding Brazil,
Argentina and
Venezuela foreign currency effects, effects of FAS No.
133 and nonrecurring
items.
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED September
30, 2002 AND 2001
($ in millions, except per share
amounts)
Nine Months Nine Months
ended ended
9/30/2002 9/30/2001
Amount Amount Amount Amount
per per
share share
Net income (loss) before
discontinued operations
and accounting change
$(24) $(0.04) $267 $0.50
South America foreign
currency transaction
losses, net (1)
321 0.59 176 0.32
Mark to market (gains)
losses from FAS
No. 133 (2) (90)
(0.16) 29 0.05
Loss on sale or
write-down of
investments (3) 104
0.19 - -
Provision for regulatory
decision in Brazil (4)
99 0.18 - -
Transaction and severance
costs related to
IPALCO transaction
- - 85 0.16
Net income from recurring
operations $410 $0.76 $557 $1.03
Diluted weighted average
shares outstanding
(in millions) 544 543
(1) South America foreign currency transaction losses, net,
consist of the following in 2002: a loss of approximately $298 million after
income tax, or $0.55 per share, from Brazil; a loss of approximately $134
million after income tax, or $0.25 per share, from Argentina; and a gain of
approximately $111 million after income tax, or $0.21 per share, from Venezuela.
For 2001, South America foreign currency transaction losses, net, consist of
the following: a loss of approximately $187 million after income tax, or $0.34
per share, from Brazil, and a gain of approximately $11 million after income
tax, or $0.02 per share, from Venezuela.
(2) Mark to market gains from FAS No. 133 consist of the
following in 2002: a loss of approximately $29 million after income tax, or
$0.06 per share, from interest rate instruments, a gain of approximately $38
million after income tax, or $0.07 per share, from foreign exchange rate
instruments, and a gain of $81 million after income tax, or $0.15 per share,
from commodity contracts. For 2001, mark to market losses from FAS No. 133
consist of the following: a loss of approximately $66 million after income tax,
or $0.12 per share, from interest rate instruments, a gain of approximately $29
million after income tax, or $0.05 per share, from foreign exchange rate
instruments, and a gain of approximately $8 million after income tax, or $0.02
per share, from commodity contracts.
(3) Amount consists of a loss of $40 million after income
tax, or $0.07 per share, resulting from an impairment charge related to an
equity method investment in a Latin American telecommunications company, and a
loss of $14 million after income tax, or $0.03 per share, related to the loss
on sale of an equity method investment in a Latin American telecommunications
company. Additionally, amount includes a loss of $50 million after income tax,
or $0.09 per share, related to the loss recognized on the sale of CANTV shares.
(4) The Company has recorded the retroactive regulatory
decision by the Brazilian regulator depriving AES Sul of amounts the Company
believes it was entitled to receive as a reduction in revenue. Pro forma
revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, approximate $6.7
billion.
Business Segment Results
AES's business segments, which include Contract Generation,
Large Utilities, Competitive Supply and Growth Distribution generated combined
income before income taxes (EBT) of $257 million for the third quarter of 2002
as compared to $359 million during the same period last year. On a geographic
basis, EBT for the third quarter of 2002 was generated 71% from North America,
6% from South America, 6% from the Caribbean, 11% from Asia and 6% from Europe
and Africa.
Contract Generation
($ in millions)
3Q 3Q Variance
2002 2001
Segment
revenues $ 611 $ 590 $ 21
% of total revenues
29% 32% (3)%
Operating margin $
245 $ 152 $ 93
% of segment revenues
40% 26% 14%
EBT $ 142 $75 $ 67
% of total EBT
55% 21% 34%
Contract Generation consists of our power plants located
around the world that have contractually limited their exposure to commodity
price risks (primarily electricity prices) for a period of at least five years
and for 75% or more of their expected output capacity.
For the third quarter of 2002, Contract Generation revenues
were $611 million and represented 29% of total revenues for the quarter, an
increase of $21 million over 2001. The most significant contributions continued
to be from North and South America, which in aggregate comprised 61% of
Contract Generation revenue for the quarter as compared to 63% for the third
quarter of 2001. Revenues were enhanced with the addition of recently completed
contract generation businesses totaling 1,537 mw (added subsequent to the third
quarter of 2001), including Ironwood in Pennsylvania (705 mw natural gas) and
Red Oak in New Jersey (832 mw natural gas). Revenues also improved at Warrior
Run in Maryland, Shady Point in Oklahoma, Tiszai in Hungary, Ebute in Nigeria,
Los Mina in the Dominican Republic and Ecogen in Australia. These improvements
were offset by declines at Uruguaiana and Tiete in Brazil, the Gener plants in
Chile, Southland and Mendota in California, Lal Pir and Pak Gen in Pakistan and
Haripur in Bangladesh.
The operating margin (as a percentage of revenues) for our
Contract Generation segment showed significant improvement over the third
quarter of 2001 at 40% for the third quarter of 2002 as compared to 26% for the
third quarter of 2001. Stronger margins and margin percentages arose during the
quarter at most contract generation plants in South America, North America,
Europe and Africa, with the most significant improvements at Tiete and
Uruguaiana in Brazil (due to the discontinuance of electricity rationing in
2002), Warrior Run, Ironwood and Red Oak in the U.S., Kilroot in Northern
Ireland, Tiszai in Hungary and Ebute in Nigeria. These improvements were
partially offset by declines at Southland and Mendota in California, Lal Pir
and Pak Gen in Pakistan and Haripur in Bangladesh.
As a result, Contract Generation delivered $142 million of
EBT (or 55% of the total) for the third quarter of 2002, an increase of 89%
over the third quarter of 2001 EBT of $75 million (21% of the total). All
geographic regions showed increases in EBT within the contract generation
segment except for the Caribbean and Asia.
Competitive Supply
($ in millions)
3Q 3Q Variance
2002 2001
Segment revenues $
437 $ 513 $ (76)
% of total revenues
20% 28% (8)%
Operating margin $
98 $ 126 $ (28)
% of segment revenues
22% 25% (3)%
EBT $
29 $ 83 $ (54)
% of total EBT
11% 23% (12)%
Competitive Supply consists primarily of our power plants
selling electricity directly to wholesale customers in competitive markets and
as a result the profitability of such plants are generally more sensitive to
fluctuations in the market price of electricity, natural gas and coal, in
particular. During the third quarter, AES completed the sale of NewEnergy, a
competitive retail supply business for approximately $260 million. As a result
of the sale, NewEnergy's results are included in the income statement for both
2001 and 2002 periods as a discontinued operation and are therefore excluded
from the discussion below.
For the third quarter of 2002, revenues for this segment
were $437 million and represented 20% of total revenues for the quarter. The
most significant contributions continued to be from the competitive markets of
the UK and the U.S. that in aggregate comprised 73% of Competitive Supply
revenue for the quarter. Competitive market prices declined year over year in
Argentina due to the devaluation of the Peso in January 2002 and prices were
also lower in California and the UK compared to 2001 and as a result total
revenue for the competitive supply segment decreased 15% from the third quarter
of 2001. Certain plants showed offsetting revenue improvements including
Tiszapalkonya in Hungary and Chivor in Colombia. Year on year increases
associated with new businesses in 2002 included Parana in Argentina (845 mw
gas) and Delano in California (50 mw gas).
The operating margin (as a percentage of revenues) for our
Competitive Supply segment was 22% in the third quarter of 2002, a decrease
from 25% in the third quarter of 2001. Improvements in margin and margin
percentages were most significant at San Nicolas in Argentina due to export
contracts that include a fixed capacity payment in U.S. Dollars, at Deepwater
in Texas, Tiszapalkonya and Borsod in Hungary, and in the Caribbean region at
Chivor in Colombia and at Panama. These improvements were offset by lower
margins at Alicura in Argentina, the New York plants, Whitefield in New
Hampshire, Barry and Drax in the UK, and most significantly by margin
reductions at Placerita in California which operated minimally during the third
quarter of 2002 due to lower prices in California. Overall, operating margin
for competitive supply declined 22% to $98 million for the third quarter of
2002.
As a result of lower competitive prices, primarily in
California and the UK, Competitive Supply generated $29 million of EBT (or 11%
of the total) for the third quarter of 2002, a decrease from the 2001 third
quarter EBT of $83 million.
Large Utilities
($ in millions)
3Q 3Q Variance
2002 2001
Segment revenues $
781 $ 424 $ 357
% of total revenues
37% 23% 14%
Operating margin $
200 $ 155 $ 45
% of segment revenues
26% 37% (11)%
EBT $
87 $ 203 $(116)
% of total EBT
34% 56% (22)%
The Large Utilities segment is comprised of our four large
integrated utilities that serve nearly 11 million customers in North America,
the Caribbean and South America. Businesses include IPALCO in Indiana, EDC in
Venezuela along with CEMIG (an equity affiliate) and Eletropaulo in Brazil.
During the second quarter of 2002, AES announced the sale of CILCO, a large
utility business serving Central Illinois, for an enterprise value of
approximately $1.4 billion. As a result of the pending sale, CILCO's results
are included in the income statement for both 2001 and 2002 periods as a
discontinued operation and are therefore excluded from the discussion below.
For the third quarter of 2002, revenues for this segment
were $781 million and represented 37% of total revenues for the quarter. The
significant increase in revenues of 84% resulted primarily from consolidating
the results of Eletropaulo (serving Sao Paulo, Brazil) beginning in February
2002 when AES acquired control of that business with a 68% voting interest
(increased from 49% prior to that date when Eletropaulo was treated as an
equity affiliate). Additional revenues from Eletropaulo of $416 million were
aided by a slight increase in revenue at IPALCO and offset by a 31% decrease in
revenues at EDC to $138 million primarily due to the devaluation of the Bolivar
during 2002.
The operating margin was $200 million for the quarter, an
increase of 29% over 2001 due to the consolidation of Eletropaulo and an
improvement in the operating margin at IPALCO. These increases were offset by a
decline in the operating margin at EDC. As a percentage of sales the operating
margin for large utilities was 26%, down from 37% for the third quarter of 2001
because of reductions in margin at EDC resulting in part from the devaluation
of the Bolivar as well as lower than average segment margins at Eletropaulo
during the third quarter of 2002 because of slower than anticipated recovery of
electricity demand from the effects of rationing in Brazil that ended in March
2002.
Large Utilities generated $87 million of EBT (or 34% of the
total) for the third quarter of 2002, down from the third quarter EBT for 2001
of $203 million (or 56%). The reduction in third quarter 2002 results primarily
from reduced contributions (after associated interest costs) from Eletropaulo
and EDC because of the factors discussed above.
Growth Distribution
($ in millions)
3Q 3Q Variance
2002 2001
Segment revenues
$ 308 $ 317 $ (9)
%
of total revenues
14% 17% (3)%
Operating margin
$ 48 $ 49 $ (1)
% of segment revenues
16% 15% 1%
EBT
$ -- $ (2) $ 2
% of total EBT
--% --% --%
Our Growth Distribution segment, serving over 5 million
customers, consists of electricity distribution companies that are generally
located in developing countries or regions where the demand for electricity is
expected to grow at a rate higher than in more developed regions.
For the third quarter of 2002, revenues were $308 million
and represented 14% of total revenues for the quarter. The Caribbean represents
the most significant contributor representing 45% of growth distribution
revenues, while South America represents 29% and Europe and Africa contributing
the remaining 26% for the quarter.
Growth Distribution revenues increased at Ede Este in the
Dominican Republic, Kievoblenergo and Rivnooblenergo in Ukraine as well as at
Sonel in Cameroon. These increases were offset by significant reductions in
Argentina because of the devaluation of the Argentine Peso, reductions at Sul
because of the devaluation during the quarter of the Brazilian Real, reductions
in revenues at our El Salvador distribution businesses and the change to
reflect Cesco in India as an equity affiliate in the third quarter of 2001.
The operating margin was $48 million or 16% of revenues as
compared with $49 million and 15% of revenues for the third quarter of 2001.
Margins improved at Sul in Brazil, Sonel in Cameroon, Telasi in Georgia,
Kievoblenergo and Rivnooblenergo in the Ukraine and Ede Este in the Dominican
Republic. Despite the reductions in revenue and operating margin arising from
the devaluation of the Argentine Peso during 2002, the margin percentages in
the Argentine distribution businesses improved slightly as compared to the
third quarter of 2001.
As a result, Growth Distribution was break even for the
third quarter of 2002, a slight increase from EBT of $(2) million in the third
quarter of 2001.
THE AES CORPORATION ---
Supplemental Data
-------2001------- -----2002----
1st
2nd 3rd 4th
Year 1st 2nd
3rd
Qtr Qtr
Qtr Qtr Qtr
Qtr Qtr
GEOGRAPHIC - % of Total
North America
Revenues (5) 26%
26% 32% 24%
27% 22% 22%
27%
Income before Taxes (1) 40% 31%
56% 34% 40%
34% 37% 71%
Caribbean (2)
Revenues (5) 26% 25%
24% 20% 24%
18% 17% 17%
Income before Taxes (1) 17% 29%
14% 30% 22%
13% 9% 6%
South America
Revenues (5) 20% 24%
21% 25% 22%
34% 37% 32%
Income before Taxes (1) 34% 36%
21% 24% 29%
26% 26% 6%
Europe/Africa
Revenues (5) 19% 17%
20% 24% 20%
21% 18% 18%
Income before Taxes (1) 5%
(2)% 2% 6% 3% 16%
14% 6%
Asia
Revenues (5) 9% 8%
3% 7% 7% 5% 6%
6%
Income before Taxes (1) 4% 6%
7% 6% 6% 11% 14%
11%
SEGMENTS - % of Total
Contract Generation
Revenues (5) 33% 33%
32% 32% 32%
29% 28% 29%
Operating Margin (3) 39% 37%
32% 49% 40%
39% 43% 41%
Income before Taxes (1) 35% 22%
21% 64% 34%
45% 45% 55%
Competitive Supply
Revenues (5) 27% 23%
28% 24% 26%
21% 19% 20%
Operating Margin (3) 28% 19%
26% 16% 22%
15% 16% 17%
Income before Taxes (1) 17% 4%
23% - 12% 10% 13%
11%
Large Utilities
Revenues (5) 20% 23%
23% 19% 21%
34% 38% 37%
Operating Margin (3) 28% 35%
32% 20% 28%
34% 33% 34%
Income before Taxes (1) 48% 71%
56% 12% 49%
34% 37% 34%
Growth Distribution Businesses
Revenues
(5) 20% 21%
17% 25% 21%
16% 15% 14%
Operating Margin (3) 5% 9%
10% 15% 10%
12% 8% 8%
Income before Taxes (1) - 3%
- 24% 5% 11% 5%
-
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS - ($ in millions,
except Total Assets in
billions)
---------------2001------------
1st 2nd
3rd 4th Year
Qtr Qtr
Qtr Qtr
Revenues(5)
$2,084 $1,877 $1,845 $1,950
$7,756
---------2002-------
1st 2nd
3rd
Qtr Qtr
Qtr
Revenues(5) $2,248
$2,272 $2,138
-------2001-------
-----2002----
1st 2nd
3rd 4th Year
1st 2nd 3rd
Qtr
Qtr Qtr Qtr
Qtr Qtr Qtr
Gross Margin Percentage
29% 25% 26% 33%
28% 31% 26%
28%
-------2001-------
1st 2nd 3rd
4th Year
Qtr Qtr Qtr
Qtr
Income before Taxes (1)
$479 $421 $359
$323 $1,582
-----2002----
1st 2nd
3rd
Qtr Qtr Qtr
Income before Taxes (1) $392 $345
$257
-------2001-------
-----2002----
1st
2nd 3rd 4th
Year 1st 2nd
3rd
Qtr Qtr
Qtr Qtr Qtr
Qtr Qtr
Net Income Excluding
Extraordinary and
Other Items (4) $225 $181 $151 $128
$685 $176 $142 $92
Total Assets
(billions) $36 $36 $36
$37 $37 $40
$39 $37
Deprec./Amort. $181 $186
$198 $196 $761 $200 $202 $198
(1) Income before
taxes excludes the Corporate and Business
Development segment.
The following items are included in the Corporate
and Business
Development segment: corporate interest, other corporate
costs, business
development expenses, Brazilian affiliates foreign
currency effects,
Argentine affiliates foreign currency effects,
Venezuelan affiliates
foreign currency effects, effects of FAS No.
133, nonrecurring
items, discontinued operations and cumulative effect
of accounting change.
(2) Includes
Venezuela and Colombia.
(3) Operating Margin
is revenues reduced by cost of sales,
depreciation and
amortization and other operating expenses.
(4) Net income
excludes Brazilian affiliates foreign currency effects,
Argentine affiliates
foreign currency effects, Venezuelan affiliates
foreign currency
effects, effects of FAS No. 133, nonrecurring items,
discontinued
operations and cumulative effect of accounting change.
(5) Revenues and
amounts calculated using revenues for the second
quarter of 2002
exclude the effect of the provision related to the
Brazilian regulatory
decision recorded by AES Sul.
THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS
September 30, 2002 AND December
31, 2001
($ in millions)
September 30, 2002 December
31, 2001
Assets:
Current assets:
Cash and cash
equivalents, including
restricted cash of
$371 and $357,
respectively $1,346 $1,279
Short term investments
305 215
Accounts receivable, net
of reserves of $352 and $240,
respectively 1,292 1,313
Inventory
503 562
Receivable from affiliates
10 10
Deferred income taxes
338 244
Prepaid expenses and
other assets 948 602
Current assets of
discontinued operations 300 467
Total current assets
5,042 4,692
Property, Plant and Equipment:
Land
697 567
Electric generation
and distribution assets 21,624 20,173
Accumulated depreciation (4,102) (3,177)
Construction in progress
4,683 4,412
Property, plant and
equipment, net 22,902 21,975
Other assets:
Deferred
financing costs, net 416 437
Project development costs
68 66
Investment in and advances
to affiliates 1,092 3,100
Debt service reserves and
other deposits
378 472
Goodwill, net
2,040 2,408
Long-term assets of
discontinued operations 2,080 2,752
Other assets 2,548 910
Total other assets
8,622 10,145
Total Assets
$36,566 $36,812
Liabilities & Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $1,085 $736
Accrued interest
443 281
Accrued and other liabilities
1,159 799
Current liabilities of
discontinued operations 553 642
Recourse debt-current portion
1,544 488
Non-recourse debt-current
portion 3,400 1,982
Total current liabilities
8,184 4,928
Long-term
liabilities
Recourse debt
4,180 4,913
Non-recourse debt
14,027 13,789
Deferred income taxes
1,650 1,695
Long-term liabilities of
discontinued operations 1,252 1,413
Other long-term liabilities
2,978 2,027
Total long-term liabilities
24,087 23,837
Minority interest, including
discontinued operations
of $41 and $124, respectively 904 1,530
Company obligated convertible
mandatorily redeemable preferred
securities of subsidiary trusts
holding solely junior
subordinated debentures of AES 978 978
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock
5 5
Additional paid-in capital
5,268 5,225
Retained earnings
2,067 2,809
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss (4,927) (2,500)
Total stockholders' equity
2,413 5,539
Total Liabilities and
Stockholders' Equity $36,566 $36,812
THE AES CORPORATION
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND OTHER
BALANCE SHEET DATA
($ in billions)
September 30, December 31,
Capitalization: 2002 2001
Recourse debt
$5.72 $5.40
Non-recourse debt
17.43 15.77
Total debt
23.15 21.17
Preferred Securities
0.98 0.98
Minority Interest
0.90 1.53
Stockholders' equity
2.41 5.54
Total capitalization
$27.44 $29.22
Selected Balance Sheet Data by Geographic Region:
Property, Plant Total
Non-recourse
September 30, 2002 &
Equipment Assets Debt
North America
29% 22% 25%
Caribbean
22% 18% 18%
South America
18% 25% 32%
Europe/Africa
23% 20% 18%
Asia
8% 7% 7%
Discontinued operations
- 6% -
Corporate
- 2% -
December 31, 2001
North America
29% 21% 28%
Caribbean 22% 18% 20%
South America
20% 27% 28%
Europe/Africa
23% 18% 19%
Asia
6% 6% 5%
Discontinued operations
- 9% -
Corporate
- 1% -
Selected Balance Sheet Data by Line of Business:
Property, Plant Total
Non-recourse
September 30, 2002 &
Equipment Assets Debt
Contract Generation
37% 35% 38%
Competitive Supply
33% 25% 23%
Large Utilities
24% 25% 32%
Growth
Distribution Businesses 6% 7% 7%
Discontinued operations
- 6% -
Corporate
- 2% -
December 31, 2001
Contract Generation
37% 33% 40%
Competitive Supply
34% 25% 25%
Large Utilities
19% 20% 26%
Growth Distribution Businesses
10% 12% 9%
Discontinued operations -
9% -
Corporate
- 1% -
The AES Corporation
Historical Parent Operating Cash Flow and Interest Coverage
Information Parent
Operating Cash Flow reflects cash payments to the
holding company (the
"Parent Company") from its subsidiary operating
businesses
(consisting of dividends, consulting and management fees,
tax sharing payments
and interest income), less Parent operating
expenses. Parent
Operating Cash Flow is measured after payment of
principal and
interest on non-recourse debt as well as maintenance
capital expenditures
at those businesses. As a result, it represents
the cash flow that is
available to service the Parent Company's
liquidity needs,
including debt service.
For more detailed information regarding Parent Operating Cash
Flow, see the notes
below.
Parent Only Data
12 Months Ended
(Last Four Quarters): September
September
30, 30,
(actual $ in millions) 1998
1999 2000 2001
2002 2001
Parent Operating
Cash Flow (1) $360 $403 $871 $1,163
$1,236 $1,160
Parent Interest
Charges (2) $118 $164 $216
$391 $471 $338
Interest Coverage
Ratio (3) 3.05x 2.46x
4.03x 2.97x 2.62x 3.43x
Parent Operating
Cash Flow (1) 360 403 871
1,163 1,236 1,160
less: Development
Costs and
Corporate Taxes (74) (48)
(103) (112) (56) (115)
less: Total Interest
Costs (including
SELLs & Trust
Preferred) (150) (198)
(415) (563) (545) (433)
Parent Free
Cash Flow (4) $136 $157
$353 $488 $635
$612
Parent Operating Cash Flow by Region:
North America 48% 60%
39% 54% 65%
43%
Caribbean 6% 7%
29% 17% 9%
22%
Asia 1% 6%
4% 8% 12%
6%
South America 25% 8%
17% 12% 4%
20%
Europe 20% 19%
11% 9% 10%
9%
Parent Operating Cash Flow by Line of Business
Contract Generation 67% 67%
44% 39% 59%
36%
Large Utilities 14% 3%
39% 31% 23%
39%
Competitive Supply 13% 24%
12% 28% 15%
22%
Growth Distribution
Businesses 6% 6%
5% 2% 3%
3%
(Quarterly):
(actual $ in millions)
Q4 Q1 Q2
Q3 Q3
2001 2002 2002
2002 2001
Parent Operating Cash Flow (1)
$390 $331 $263
$252 $335
Parent Interest Charges (2)
$120 $116 $105
$130 $112
Interest Coverage Ratio (3)
3.25x 2.85x 2.50x 1.94x 2.99x
Parent Operating Cash Flow (1)
390 331 263
252 335
less: Development Costs and
Corporate Taxes (24)
(14) (11) (7)
(25)
less: Total Interest Costs
(including SELLs & Trust
Preferred) (115) (136) (140) (154) (112)
Parent Free Cash Flow (4)
$251 $181 $112
$91 $198
(Last Four Quarters):
(actual $ in millions) December
March June September September
31, 31,
30, 30, 30,
2001 2002
2002 2002 2001
Parent Operating
Cash Flow (1) $1,163
$1,314 $1,319 $1,236
$1,160
Parent Interest
Charges (2) $391
$428 $453 $471
$338
Interest Coverage
Ratio (3) 2.97x
3.07x 2.91x 2.62x
3.43x
Note 1:
(1) Our Parent
Operating Cash Flow, formerly titled "Parent EBITDA",
definition may differ
from that, or similarly titled measures, used by
other companies.
Parent Operating Cash Flow is not a substitute for
cash flows from operating
activities as defined by generally accepted
accounting
principles, or as an indicator of operating performance or
as a measure of
liquidity. Parent Operating Cash Flow includes the
following amounts
(determined without duplication) received in cash by
the Parent Company
from operating subsidiaries and affiliates less
Parent operating
expenses:
(A) Dividends.
(B) Consulting and management fees.
(C) Tax sharing payments.
(D) Interest and other distributions paid during the period with
respect to cash and
other temporary cash investments.
Parent Operating Cash Flow does not include the following cash
payments made to the
Parent Company by its subsidiaries and
affiliates:
(A) Returns of invested capital.
(B) Repayments of debt principal.
(C) Payments released from debt service reserve accounts upon the
issuance of letters
of credit for the benefit of subsidiaries or
affiliates.
(2) Parent Interest
Charges include interest payments both expensed
and capitalized. It
excludes distributions paid for trust preferred
securities. This
definition may differ from that, or similarly titled
measures, used by
other companies.
(3) Parent Interest
Coverage Ratio is defined as the ratio of Parent
Operating Cash Flow
for such period to Parent Interest Charges for
such period.
(4) Parent Free Cash
Flow is defined as Parent Operating Cash Flow
less development
costs, taxes, and Total Interest costs (including
interest on SELLs and
trust preferred securities dividends).
The AES Corporation
Forecasted Parent Operating Cash Flow
and Liquidity 2002-2003
In the tables below, historical (actual) information is denoted
with an "A"
next to the year and forecasted information is denoted
with an "F"
next to the year.
Parent Only Data
($ in millions) Q1 Q2
Q3 Q4 YE
2002 A
2002 A 2002 A 2002 F
2002 F
Parent Operating
Cash Flow (1) $331 $263 $252
$224 $1,070
Parent Interest
Charges (2) $116 $105 $130
$107 $458
Interest Coverage
Ratio (3) 2.85x
2.50x 1.94x 2.09x
2.34x
Parent Operating Cash Flow by Region:
North America 58% 46%
66% 65% 59%
Caribbean
4% 20% 2% 3% 7%
Asia
13% 13% 22%
21% 17%
Europe
10% 15% 8% 8% 10%
South America
15% 6% 2% 3% 7%
Parent Operating Cash Flow by Line of Business
Contract Generation
54% 61% 54%
73% 60%
Large Utilities
31% 34% 30%
15% 28%
Competitive Supply
14% 4% 15% 9% 11%
Growth Distribution
1% 1% 1% 3% 1%
Parent Sources & Uses
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 YE
($
in millions) 2002 A 2002 A
2002 A 2002 F 2002 F
Sources
Distributions from
Subsidiaries $340
$269 $268 $246
$1,123
less: Corporate Overhead
(9) (6) (16)
(22) (53)
Parent Operating
Cash Flow (1) 331
263 252 224
1,070
less: Development
Costs and
Corporate Taxes (14)
(11) (7) (12)
(44)
less: Total Interest
Costs (including
SELLs & Trust Preferred) (136) (140)
(154) (134) (564)
Parent Free Cash Flow (4)
181 112 91
78 462
Agreed Asset Sales
- - 251
- 251
Additional Asset Sales
- - -
- -
Project Financing Proceeds
- 239 -
- 239
Bank Loan Renewals
(net of transaction
costs) (5) -
- - 1,570
1,570
Bond Exchange (5)
- - - 263 263
Beginning Liquidity
565 285 359
395 565
Total Sources
$746 $636 $701
$2,306 $3,350
Uses
Bank Loan Repayments
63 $63 $225
$- $351
Bank Loan Renewals - - - 1,620
1,620
Bond Exchange (5)
- - - 263 263
Bond Repayments (5)
- - - 188 188
Committed Investments
398 214 81 77 770
Ending Liquidity
285 359 395
158 158
Total Uses
$746 $636 $701
$2,306 $3,350
Note 2:
(1) Please see Note 1 for definition.
(2) Please see Note 1 for definition.
(3) Please see Note 1 for definition.
(4) Please see Note 1 for definition.
(5) The forecast includes the following refinancing transaction:
(A) "Bank Loan Renewals (net of transaction costs)" includes
the following: $850 million Variable
rate revolving bank loan
due 2003, $425 million Term loan due
2003, $262.5 million EDC
SELLs due 2003 , (pound)52.2 million
letter of credit due
2004.
(B) "Bond Exchange" includes $112.5 million of $300 million
8.75% Senior notes due December 2002,
and $150 million of $200
million Remarketable or Redeemable
Securities (ROARS)
remarketable in June 2003. These
calculations assume a 75%
participation rate for the bond
exchange and that the December
2002 tendered securities are exchanged for 50% cash and 50%
new secured notes, while the ROARS
tendered securities are
exchanged 100% for the new secured
notes.
(C) "Bond Repayment" includes $187.5 million of 8.75% Senior
notes due December 2002 repaid ($112.5
million in November
2002, $75 million at maturity in
December 2002).