/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/180830.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Thursday, August 30, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 241

                            Headlines

1021 WEST 8TH AVENUE: Case Summary & 16 Unsecured Creditors
18 AUDUBON PLACE: Creditor Evicting Principal Occupying Collateral
3600 ASHE: Sale of 19 Condo Units Further Delays Plan Filing
4 WEST HOLDINGS: SC-GA Buying Restructuring Portfolio for $227M
AEROCHAMPION GYMNASTICS: Taps CCG as Financial Advisor

AIAD SAMUEL: Judge McManus Junks 2nd Recusal Bid
ALLY FINANCIAL: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' LT IDR, Outlook Positive
ALPHABET HOLDING: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR, Outlook Stable
ALSTRAW ENTERPRISES: Selling 3 Virginia Coin Laundries for $269K
AMERICAN GREEN: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

ASP MCS ACQUISITION: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B-', Outlook Stable
AUBURN ARMATURE: Letter Agreement Between Trust, AAI and UEP Valid
BANCO SANTOS: Judicial Administrator Selling Artworks at Auction
BLAIR OIL: Trustee Selling Interest in Duda Lease for $82K
BNEVMA LLC: Exclusive Solicitation Period Extended Until Dec. 20

BTH QUITMAN: Taps Nardiello Law Firm as Special Counsel
CCS.COM.USA INC: Dismissal of Chapter 11 Case Remains
CHRYSLER LLC: Ct. Junks New Co.'s Bid to Enforce Sale Documents
COVANTA HOLDING: S&P Rates New $334.6MM Unsec Tax-Exempt Notes 'B'
DLS CHICKEN: Unsecureds to be Paid 100% Plus 2.07% Interest

EAT FIT: Proposes Bell Auction of Georgia Kitchen's Kitchen Eqpt.
ECLIPSE RESOURCES: S&P Puts 'B-' ICR on CreditWatch Positive
EPW LLC: Seeks to Hire Hammerschmidt, Amaral & Jonas as Counsel
ETERNAL JEWELERS: HK Assets Buying Assets for $14K
EVIO INC: Reports $3.45 Million Net Loss for Third Quarter

FARNAN INC: Has Until Sept. 28 To Exclusively File Chapter 11 Plan
FE26 LLC: Seeks to Hire PAI CPA, PLLC as Accountant & Advisor
FLYING COW RANCH: Has Until Dec. 3 to Exclusively File Plan
FORASTERO INC: Hires Tinelli Fernandez as Special Counsel
FORTERRA INC: S&P Affirms B- Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable

FRANK MOULTRIE: Court Grants FMC, T. Witt Bid for Summary Judgment
GATEWAY HOLDING: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
GENESIS ENERGY: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B+', Outlook Stable
GIGA-TRONICS: Sold 6,500 Additional Shares of Series E Pref. Stock
HOPEWELL RISK: Unsecureds Creditors to Receive 70% of Allowed Claim

HORIZONTAL RENTALS: Hires David T. Cain as Counsel
INNOVATIVE WINDOW: Hires Brian K. McMahon as Attorney
INTOWN COMPANIES: Panama Assets Buying Panama Property for $10K
JACOBS FINANCIAL: Delays 2018 Annual Report to Complete Review
JAMES TAGLIARENI: Case FCNJ Buying Annandale Property for $1.2M

JEFE PLOVER: Hires Cavazos Hendricks Poirot as Counsel
JONAS WERNER: Hires McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney as Attorney
JONESBORO HOSPITALITY: Lender Selling Real/Personal Property
KANTIS UNIVERSAL: Hires Kelley & Fulton PL as General Counsel
KELLY GRAINGER: Proposes $600K Sale of Waxhaw Property

KRUGER PRODUCTS: DBRS Puts BB Issuer Rating on Review Negative
LEVEL SOLAR: Plan Proposes to Transfer Assets to LSI Creditor Trust
M&G USA: Seeks Sept. 5 Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extension
MEEKER NORTH: Seeks Oct. 22 Exclusive Period Extension
MID-SOUTH GEOTHERMAL: Seeks Aug. 30 Exclusive Period Extension

MONTGOMERY SERVICES: Needs Clearer Record of Income & Expenses
NATIONAL MANAGEMENT: Has Until Dec. 21 to Exclusively File Plan
NMSOOH INC: Delays Plan to Formulate Financial Projections
ORTHOPAEDIC AND NEURO: Hires Scarlett, Croll & Myers as Counsel
PACIFIC DRILLING: Has Until Oct. 29 To Exclusively File Plan

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL: S&P Affirms 'B' ICR, Outlook Stable
PARKPROVO LLC: Seeks Dec. 19 Exclusive Plan Filing Extension
PEANUT CO: Seeks Nov. 21 Plan Exclusivity Perioad Extension
POLICLINICA FAMILIAR: Continuing Operation of Business to Fund Plan
POPLAR CREEK: Seeks Dec. 31, 2018 Exclusive Plan Period Extension

PRECISION CASTPARTS: Egan-Jones Hikes Sr. Unsecured Ratings to B+
PURADYN FILTER: Signs New Distributor Agreement with MNI
QUANTUM CORP: Secures up to $20 Million Additional Term Loans
R.E. GAS DEVELPMENT: Talks With Creditors Delay Plan Filing
RALSTON-LIPPINCOTT: Proposes $338K Private Sale of Chester Property

RICHARD HOWARD: Wachira Buying Dallas Property for $700K
RL ENTERPRISES: Amends Plan to Resolve Confirmation Objections
ROCK CREEK MEDICAL: Taps Evans & Mullinix as Counsel
RUBY'S SOCAL DINERS: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
SAN JUAN ICE: Ice Plant Repair Delays Plan Filing

SS&C TECHNOLOGIES: S&P Assigns 'BB' Rating on $875MM Term Loan B-5
STAR MOUNTAIN: Intends to File Amended Chapter 11 Plan by Nov. 30
STRUSS FARMS: Seeks Dec. 22 Exclusive Plan Filing Extension
TERVITA CORP: S&P Hikes Issuer Credit Rating to B+, Outlook Stable
TITAN ENERGY: CEO Quits to Pursue Other Business Activities

TOMMIE LINGENFELTER: Wong Buying Macon Property for $45K
U REST: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
VER TECHNOLOGIES: Emerges from Chapter 11
WALLACE & GALE: Maryland Court Affirms Ruling Favoring Busch Couple
[*] Discounted Tickets for 2018 Distressed Investing Conference!

[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings

                            *********

1021 WEST 8TH AVENUE: Case Summary & 16 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 1021 West 8th Avenue Limited Partnership
        1021 Wrest 8th Avenue
        King of Prussia, PA 19406

Business Description: 1021 West 8th Avenue Limited Partnership
                      is a real estate lessor based in  King of
                      Prussia, Pennsylvania.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 28, 2018

Case No.: 18-15683

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)

Judge: Hon. Jean K. FitzSimon

Debtor's Counsel: Mark S. Haltzman, Esq.
                  SILVERANG DONOHOE ROSENZWEIG & HALTZMAN, LLC
                  595 East Lancaster Avenue, Suite 203
                  St. Davids, PA 19087
                  Tel: 610-263-0115
                  Fax: 215-754-4932
                  Email: mhaltzman@sanddlawyers.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Arnold M. Katz, president of general
partner of the Debtor.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 16 unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb18-15683_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb18-15683.pdf


18 AUDUBON PLACE: Creditor Evicting Principal Occupying Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------------
SBN V FNBC LLC, the largest creditor of 18 Audubon Place, LLC, asks
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana to
(i) immediately evict the persons improperly occupying its
collateral, a home located at 18 Audubon Place, New Orleans,
Louisiana; and (ii) authorize an expedited sales process,or, in the
alternative, for an order appointing a Chapter 11 trustee, or,
alternatively, termination of the period of exclusivity provided
for a debtor to file a plan of reorganization.

As set forth in its schedules, the Debtor's only asset is the Home.
The Home is located on the exclusive gated street known as Audubon
Place in uptown New Orleans directly adjacent to Tulane University.
The Audubon Place homes are among the most expensive parcels of
real estate within both the City of New Orleans and the State of
Louisiana.

As of Aug. 1, 2018, the Debtor owed SBN the following amounts:

     $4,416,044   -   Principal
     $1,011,553   -   Interest, accrued since 1/10/18 at 21%, or
$2,576.03 per day
     $6,000       -   Late charges
     $12,123      -   Insurance-force placed
     $12,535      -   Legal fees
     $89          -   Postage
     $5,458,345   -   Total

The Debtor's indebtedness is evidenced by, inter alia, that certain
promissory note, dated May 15, 2015, originally executed by the
Debtor in favor of First NBC Bank in the original principal amount
of $4.42 million.  The Debtor has failed to make any payments since
Aug. 24, 2016 and has not paid real estate taxes on the Home.

On Oct. 11, 2016, FNBC filed a Petition for Foreclosure Via
Executory Process with Appraisement in the Civil District Court for
the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana, commencing case no.
16-10114.  By Order entered on Oct. 11, 2016, the State Court
ordered the Orleans Parish Sheriff to seize and sell the Home.

On April 28, 2017, FNBC was closed, and the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corp. was confirmed as receiver and vested with title and
ownership of FNBC's assets.  Effective Oct. 18, 2017, FDIC, as
receiver of FNBC, assigned the Note, Mortgage and related documents
to SBN.  On Jan. 12, 2018, SBN filed a Supplemental and Amending
Petition for Executory Process to substitute into the foreclosure
as the proper plaintiff, and to continue the foreclosure on the
Home.

The Debtor thereafter undertook various steps to delay the
foreclosure of the Home, including the filing of a petition for
injunctive relief, followed thereafter by the filing of a motion
for preliminary injunction to delay the foreclosure of the Home.
The Debtor's requests to enjoin the foreclosure were withdrawn or
dismissed shortly before the Debtor filed the instant bankruptcy
proceeding.

According to Schedule G, the Debtor "leases" the Home to Richard
Goldenberg, the Debtor's principal, for $25,000.  Goldenberg is
listed as the 98% owner of the Debtor (the other 2% is owned by
Robert Goldenberg) and as its manager.  Schedule G does not provide
the length of the remaining term of this alleged lease.

The Debtor's Schedule A/B provides that the Debtor is owed $1.2
million on the Lease, $600,000 of which it claims is doubtful or
uncollectible.  Based upon this assertion, and the monthly rental
amount of $25,000, the Debtor has allowed Mr. Goldenberg to
continue to live in the Home without paying rent for 4 years.
Despite this history of nonpayment, the day before the Debtor filed
bankruptcy the Debtor purported to record a "Lease" dated July 23,
2018 under which the Debtor purported to lease Goldenberg the Home
through Dec. 31, 2019.  

The Debtor owes the Audubon Place Commission $22,000 for home owner
dues, and the City of New Orleans $65,600 for real estate taxes.
In fact, the Home was sold at tax sale on May 9, 2018.  Meanwhile,
the Debtor has not paid a penny on SBN's indebtedness since August
of 2016.

On July 28, 2010, Goldenberg filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in case
no. 10-12728.  In Mr. Goldenberg's Sept.9, 2010, amended schedules,
he listed the Home as his personal asset with a value of $4.8
million, but subject to a secured claim of $4,490,243.

Similar to this proceeding, the Goldenberg Bankruptcy was filed on
July 28, 2010, the day before the Home was scheduled for
foreclosure sale on July 29, 2010.  On Aug. 13, 2010, Whitney
National Bank, as the holder of the indebtedness secured by a
mortgage on the Home, filed a Motion to Lift Stay.  Whitney stated
that no payment had been made on the indebtedness since August of
2009, real estate taxes in excess of $260,000 were owed on the
Home, and property insurance had not been maintained.

On Oct. 6, 2010, Whitney and Goldenberg reached an agreed Order in
the Goldenberg Bankruptcy on the Motion to Lift Stay, which
provided, among other things, (1) that the stay would be lifted to
allow a foreclosure sale to occur after Dec. 16, 2010, but also (2)
that Whitney would agree to assign the indebtedness secured by the
Home to a person designated by the Debtor in exchange for a cash
payment prior to Dec. 10, 2010.

Mr. Goldenberg filed numerous plans and disclosure statements in
the Goldenberg Bankruptcy which met with numerous objections.
Ultimately, on July 22, 2011, Goldenberg filed the Fifth Amended
Plan of Reorganization (Final).  The accompanying Disclosure
Statement explained that the Whitney indebtedness secured by the
Home had been purchased by 18 Audubon Place, LLC, the Debtor.

The Plan provided that on Aug. 31, 2011, Goldenberg would transfer
the Home to the Debtor to satisfy Mr. Goldenberg's indebtedness.
The Orleans Parish real estate records reflect that by Act of
Transfer by Richard A. Goldenberg to 18 Audubon Place, LLC dated
May 31, 2012, Goldenberg transferred the Home to the Debtor.

Goldenberg acquired the Debtor, and, in so doing, effectively
reacquired the Home, although it is unclear precisely when this
occurred.  Goldenberg's Plan did not disclose that he would be
acquiring 18 Audubon Place, LLC or that he would continue to reside
in the Home.  In fact, the Disclosure Statement and Plan provided
that Goldenberg would be relinquishing the home to satisfy the
secured indebtedness.

Goldenberg failed to comply with the provisions of the Plan.  The
Court ordered Goldenberg to take action to correct numerous
deficiencies -- payment of professional fees, filing of required
reports, etc. -- but he appears to have ignored the Court's order.
Ultimately, the Court entered a Rule to Show Cause requiring that
Goldenberg appear before the Court on Dec. 1, 2016 and show cause
why he failed to comply with the Court's order.  Goldenberg failed
to appear as ordered on Dec. 1, 2016.

By Order entered on Dec. 3, 2016, the Court dismissed Goldenberg's
bankruptcy case with prejudice, provided that Goldenberg is not
entitled to a discharge, and barred Goldenberg and his wife from
filing a bankruptcy case for a period of five years from the date
of the order.  After six years of consuming the resources of the
bankruptcy court, the Goldenberg Bankruptcy was dismissed, Mr.
Goldenberg was denied a discharge and Mr. Goldenberg was prohibited
from filing bankruptcy until Dec. 4, 2021.  Just before his first
bankruptcy case was dismissed, the Home was back in foreclosure and
remained in foreclosure from October 2016 until this bankruptcy
case was filed in August of 2018.

Despite the Goldenberg Dismissal Order, the Home is again back in
bankruptcy, albeit now through the Debtor, Mr. Goldenberg's limited
liability company.  Despite Goldenberg personally being prohibited
from seeking further bankruptcy protection for a five year period,
Goldenberg through the Debtor, has managed again to obtain
bankruptcy protection by placing title to the Home in a limited
liability company that he owns and manages and placing that company
into bankruptcy.

To make matters worse, the Debtor appears to have improperly
concocted venue in the District presumably to avoid the
repercussions of having evaded the Goldenberg Dismissal Order.  SBN
is not asking that the Court transfers venue at this time because
it would lead to more delay.  However, the Court should be aware of
the facts regarding the Debtor's actions in filing the case.

As reflected by the Schedules, the Debtor's only asset is in New
Orleans, the Debtor's principal is in New Orleans and the Debtor's
creditors are in New Orleans (except for SBN).  The Debtor's
Initial Report, filed by Debtor on Dec. 14, 2010 with the Louisiana
Secretary of State, set forth a municipal address located in New
Orleans.  This same Initial Report provided that the Debtor's
initial member was domiciled in New Orleans; Mr. Goldenberg, the
Debtor's 98% owner, and Robert Goldenberg, the Debtor's 2% owner,
are both domiciled in New Orleans; the Debtor's registered agent
for service of process has at all times been located in New
Orleans.

On July 19, 2018, less than two weeks prior to Debtor filing
bankruptcy in the Court, the Debtor filed a Notice of Change with
the Louisiana Secretary of State changing its municipal address and
mailing address to 537 Cajundome Boulevard, Suite 111, Lafayette,
Louisiana.  The Debtor's schedules do not reflect that it owns 537
Cajundome Boulevard nor do the Debtor's schedules reflect that it
leases 537 Cajundome Boulevard from the owner.  The Debtor appears
to have changed or concocted its address specifically to file
bankruptcy in the District rather than where the Home is located,
its principal is located and most of its creditors are located.
Other than the mysterious 537 Cajundome Boulevard address, Debtor's
filings do not show any other connection to the District.

Incredibly, Goldenberg, the Debtor's principal, continues to live
in the Home.  The Debtor's own schedules reflect that Goldenberg
owes $1.2 million on the alleged lease by the Debtor.  The Debtor
has allowed Mr. Goldenberg to continue to live in the Home without
paying rent for four years.  This must end immediately.  The Debtor
has a fiduciary obligation to get Goldenberg out of the Home
immediately.

SBN asks that the Court put an end to Goldenberg's occupation of
the Home now.  How Goldenberg managed to remain in one of the most
expensive homes in the state for nearly a decade without paying for
it may make for a good novel.  Now it is time for his occupation to
end without any further delay.  SBN asks that the Court orders
Goldenberg out of the Home within 10 days.

In an attempt to avoid immediate eviction and protect Goldenberg's
wrongful occupancy, the Debtor and Goldenberg purported to record a
Lease of the Home to Goldenberg on July 31, 2018, the day before
the Debtor filed bankruptcy.  The lease is invalid because it was
filed after the Home was seized and without proper authority.  The
Seizure Order was entered on Oct. 11, 2016 in the Foreclosure
Proceeding and notice of the seizure was recorded in the Orleans
Parish mortgage records on Oct. 25, 2016.  The Lease was not
recorded until July 31, 2018.

SBN asks that the Court authorizes it to file a motion to approve
an expedited process to sell the Home.  Mr. Goldenberg has managed
to successfully use the procedural rules of the state and federal
courts to continuously delay both his personal eviction from, and
the sale of, the Home.  SBN wishes to avoid any further delay, and
respectfully asks that the Court terminates the Exclusivity Period,
for cause, and permit SBN to immediately submit a plan of
reorganization so as to facilitate the expeditious marketing and
sale of the Home and the satisfaction of the Debtor's indebtedness
to SBN as quickly as possible, and to avoid any further unnecessary
costs and expenses, which continue to accrue.  

In the event that the Court declines to terminate the Exclusivity
Period, SBN respectfully asks that a trustee be appointed pursuant
to Section 1112(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Counsel for SBN:

          David F. Waguespack, Esq.
          Peter J. Segrist, Esq.
          CARVER, DARDEN, KORETZKY, TESSIER
          FINN, BLOSSMAN & AREAUX, L.L.C.
          1100 Poydras Street, Suite 3100
          New Orleans, LA 70163
          Telephone: (504) 585-3814
          Facsimile: (504) 585-3801

                     About 18 Audubon Place

18 Audubon Place, LLC, owns a real property located at 18 Audubon
Place New Orleans, LA 70118 valued by the company at $5.2 million.
The Debtor sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No.
18-50960) on Aug. 1, 2018.  The case is assigned to Judge Robert
Summerhays.  In the petition signed by Richard Goldenberg,
member/manager, the Debtor disclosed total assets at $5.80 million
and total liabilities at $7.23 million.  The Debtor tapped William
C. Vidrine, Esq., at Vidrine & Vidrine, PLLC as counsel.


3600 ASHE: Sale of 19 Condo Units Further Delays Plan Filing
------------------------------------------------------------
3600 Ashe, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California to further extend the Debtor's exclusive
periods to file a plan and solicit votes on the plan to, and
including, Nov. 21, 2018, and Jan. 20, 2019, respectively.

A hearing on the Debtor's request is scheduled for Oct. 9, 2018, at
2:00 p.m.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on June 11, 2018, the
Court extended, at the behest of the Debtor, the exclusive period
to file a plan to Aug. 23, 2018, and the Debtor's exclusive period
to solicit votes on the plan to Oct. 22, 2018.

The Debtor continues to make progress in this case.  It now
anticipates proposing a single sale of its principal assets, the 19
condominium units in the Ashe Property, within the next couple of
months, which sale will likely pay off the substantial majority of
the secured claims, including those claims held by Interstate
2010-1 Fund LLC and LendingHome Funding Corporation, the only
creditors actively participating in this case.  Allowing the Debtor
to focus on facilitating a sale, without being potentially
distracted by the proposal of a competing plan, would benefit the
secured creditors, who hold the most claims, in number and amount,
in this case.  And with the claims bar date now passed and
non-insider creditors asserting unsecured claims of only $1,250,
there can be no undue prejudice to the unsecured creditors who will
have to wait a few more months for the Debtor to propose and
confirm a plan.  

The Debtor concedes that its Chapter 11 case is not unduly large or
complex and is nowhere close to being a mega case.  Nevertheless,
this case does involve a number of complications that do not make
this case simple or straightforward.  In particular, this case does
not involve a secured creditor with a blanket lien against all of
the Debtor's assets.  Rather, in this case, the Debtor will be
proposing a sale of the 19 Debtor Units, which will involve the
Debtor addressing 29 consensual liens that encumber those Units,
with some liens encumbering only a single Unit and others are
cross-collateralized against between 4 and 15 Units.

Given that the sale of the Debtor Units will likely satisfy a
substantial majority of the secured claims and that the non-insider
unsecured creditors have filed de minimis claims, any negotiations
with creditors regarding a plan are likely to be short and limited.
Nevertheless, the terms of a plan proposed by the Debtor will be
influenced by the outcome of the sale, which means that the Debtor
cannot properly formulate the terms until it has a better idea of
what a sale will produce.  And since a sale has not yet been
proposed to the Court, the Debtor needs more time to negotiate a
plan and prepare adequate information regarding the plan.  

While the docket in this case may not necessarily show it, the
Debtor has made good faith progress behind the scenes.  After
experiencing limited progress with its first postpetition property
manager and broker during the first few months of this case, the
Debtor has rebounded with a new property manager, who has
effectively stabilized the Debtor Units, and a new broker, who has
already found potential buyers for the Units.  Soon the Debtor will
have a sale put together that has the potential to pay off the
majority of the claims filed in this case.

As evidenced by the prior monthly operating reports, the Debtor
acknowledges that it is not current with its postpetition
obligations, including homeowners' association dues, management
fees, and repair costs that have accrued and become due over the
past several months.  However, with the Court having recently
entered the cash collateral/financing court order on Aug. 1, the
Debtor now has the ability to pay and become current with those
postpetition obligations.

Given that the sale of the Debtor Units will likely satisfy a
substantial majority of the secured claims and that the non-insider
unsecured creditors have filed de minimis claims, the likelihood of
the Debtor filing a viable plan is relatively high.  The Debtor has
not started any negotiations with its creditors, but there is
little to negotiate at this point in the case.  Interstate and
LendingHome are the only two active creditors, and their claims
will be addressed in connection with the sale of the Debtor Units.
As to the remaining creditors, they have not participated in any
manner (other than filing proofs of claim), suggesting that they do
not currently have issues with the progress of this case.  

Not much time has elapsed in this case.  The case has only been
pending for eight months, with the Debtor intending to propose a
plan before its one-year anniversary.  This weighs in favor of
granting the Debtor's request.

A copy of the Debtor's request is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-25614-138.pdf

                     About 3600 Ashe, LLC

3600 Ashe, LLC, based in Glendale, CA, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-25614) on Dec. 26, 2017.  In the
petition signed by Stephen Hall, managing member, the Debtor
estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.
The Hon. Deborah J. Saltzman presides over the case.  Dean G.
Rallis Jr., Esq., at Anglin Flewelling Rasmussen Campbell & Trytten
LLP, serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


4 WEST HOLDINGS: SC-GA Buying Restructuring Portfolio for $227M
---------------------------------------------------------------
4 West Holdings, Inc. and its debtor-affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas to authorize
the sale of the sale of the assets often referred to in these cases
as the "restructuring portfolio" to SC-GA 2018 Partners, LLC, for
$227 million pursuant to their Asset Purchase Agreement, dated Aug.
13, 2018.

On May 14, 2018, the Court entered its Bid Procedures Order.  On
June 19, 2018, the Debtors, in consultation with OHI Asset RO, LLC
and certain of its affiliates ("Omega") and the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors, conducted an auction for the Restructuring
Portfolio.  At the conclusion of the Auction, the Purchaser was
named the winning bidder.

Pursuant to the Motion, the Debtors ask an order from the Court
affirming the results of, and benefits obtained at, the Auction and
authorizing the consummation of the sale of the Restructuring
Portfolio to the Purchaser.

As the Court is no doubt aware, the Debtors commenced these chapter
11 cases to implement a comprehensive restructuring of their
business and financial affairs through a pre-negotiated
Restructuring Support Agreement ("RSA") with Omega, which sought to
maximize the value of their’ assets, provide for a smooth
transition of operations for the health and safety of their
residents, and create a process by which all constituents would
have the opportunity for fair and equitable treatment of their
claims and interests.

Pursuant to the RSA, the parties agreed, during the pendency of
these cases and on a schedule dictated by Omega, to the transfer of
approximately half of the Debtors' skilled-nursing facilities
("Transfer Portfolio") to new operators designated by Omega, and to
deem the remaining Restructuring Portfolio recharacterized, so that
the Debtors could market and sell those assets, with the Purchaser
serving as the Court-approved "stalking horse" bidder.  To
facilitate the fastest possible consummation of the transfer of the
Restructuring Portfolio, the parties agreed that the Purchaser's
"stalking horse" bid would be in the form of a Plan Funding
Commitment and Stock Purchase Agreement ("SPA"), pursuant to which
the Purchaser would sponsor a pre-negotiated plan of reorganization
with the Debtors' and Omega's support.

Since the commencement of the Debtors' bankruptcy cases, the
Debtors also agreed to implement certain additional governance and
procedural safeguards: Omega agreed to provide $4 million (or $8
million, pending resolution of the Committee's motion on this
issue) to general unsecured creditors on an undiluted basis; the
Debtors agreed to consider competing offers from potential bidders
proposing alternate structures (including 363 asset sales for all
or a portion of the Restructuring Portfolio); the Court approved
bidding procedures and authorized the Debtors to conduct the
Auction for the Restructuring Portfolio, during which the value of
the stalking horse transaction was increased by approximately $11
million. All of the foregoing had the effect of materially
benefiting the Debtors' estates and their creditors.

While Omega has since purported to terminate the RSA, the good news
is that Omega's attempt to walk away from its commitments and
derail the Debtors' cases does not undo the Court's prior order
with respect to the marketing and sale of the Restructuring
Portfolio, or the Auction results, and the Debtors are still able
to preserve the benefits obtained at the Auction for their estates
and creditors.

The Court-approved, competitive process resulted in the Auction,
during which the Purchaser increased the value of the initial bid
to the Debtors' estates by approximately $11 million.  As a result,
at the Auction and in consultation with Omega and the Committee,
the Debtors selected the Purchaser as the "winning bidder" for the
Restructuring Portfolio, and SentosaCare, LLC or its designee was
selected as the "back-up bidder."  Omega's counsel and
representative at the Auction enthusiastically supported the
Auction's results.

Following Omega's abrupt and unexpected purported withdrawal of
support for the Debtors' Third Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization
Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code , its breach of the RSA,
and in conjunction with the Court's ruling on July 9, 2018
regarding the Debtors' motion to interpret the Plan, the Debtors
were faced with two options: either (i) suffer the termination of
the SPA and lose the benefit of the long-negotiated and
value-increasing sale process, pay to the Purchaser the Break-Up
Fee and Expense Reimbursement, and jeopardize their ongoing
operations and reorganization efforts; or (ii) they could pursue
recharacterization of the leases comprising the Restructuring
Portfolio and effectively keep the sale process intact.

The choice was clear, of course, and the Debtors pursued the
latter, negotiating with the Purchaser to convert its winning bid
as originally reflected in the SPA, into the APA, on equal or
better economic terms as those announced at the Auction.  Because
the Bid
Procedures expressly permitted the Debtors to accept bids in the
form of a stock or asset purchase agreement, the Debtors, in
consultation with their investment banker, Houlihan Lokey Capital,
Inc., believe that this mechanical change -- converting the
Purchaser;s SPA into an APA -- is in conformance with, and is
authorized by, the existing Bid Procedures.

By the Motion, therefore, the Debtors ask relatively limited relief
-- namely, authorization to consummate the transaction with the
Purchaser in a manner clearly contemplated under the Bid Procedures
Order.  This will allow them to maximize the value of the
Restructuring Portfolio and will further push these cases toward a
final resolution. Following recharacterization of Omega's leases
and consummation of the sale to the Purchaser, the open issues will
no longer center around who owns what, but instead on who is
entitled to the pot of cash.

This narrowing of the issues will then enable the Debtors to
propose a chapter 11 liquidating plan in short order, and allow a
liquidating trustee to step in and deal with any trailing disputes
on claims and distributions.  At bottom, this is the most efficient
and effective way to bring these cases to a close, and maximize
value for all estate stakeholders.  The Motion should be granted.

The material economic terms of the APA are:

     a. Purchase Price: An aggregate amount of $227 million, in
addition to the assumption of the Assumed Liabilities, the Hired
Employees PTO Benefits and the Transition Services.

     b. The Purchase Price consists of Cash Consideration of $197
million (from which the Debtors may elect to use $2 million to
satisfy tort claims under a liquidating plan to the extent
permitted by applicable law) plus a promissory note in the
principal amount of $30 million payable to Omega.

     c. Purchase Price Adjustment: In the event that the Debtors
cannot convey the portion of the Transferred Assets that are
subject to the Laurel Baye Leases, the Purchase Price and the Cash
Consideration will each be reduced by $49 million and the Purchaser
will have the option to have the Debtors assume and assign such
leases to the Purchaser, in which case the Purchaser will pay any
Cure Costs.

     d. Transferred Assets: The Transferred Assets consist of the
real estate and all tangible and intangible personal property
associated with the Restructuring Portfolio, those executory
contracts and leases designated for assumption and assignment by
the Purchaser, certain claims, causes of action and avoidance
claims relating to both vendors continuing to do business with the
Restructuring Portfolio and the Purchaser's affiliates which
includes certain insiders of the Debtors, and certain other assets
related to the operation of the Restructuring Portfolio, as more
specifically described in the APA.

     e. Waiver of Claims: The assumption by the Purchaser or waiver
of approximately $18 million in pre-petition claims held by certain
related parties that provide services to the Debtors.
Additionally, upon closing of the transactions contemplated by the
APA and execution of the mutual release in connection therewith,
the Debtors' estates will be relieved of the obligation to pay to
Purchaser the Break-Up Fee and Expense Reimbursement, resulting in
additional savings of $4.5 million.

     f. Transition Services: The Purchaser or a related party will
provide transition services to the Debtors and their estates at a
discounted rate for six months.

Under the APA, the Debtors may seek to assume and assign to the
Purchaser certain of the Assumed Agreements, free and clear of all
Encumbrances, and to execute and deliver to the Purchaser such
documents or other instruments as may be necessary to assign and
transfer such Assumed Agreements to the Purchaser.  The Purchaser
will provide a list to the Debtors of the Contracts and Leases to
be assumed and assigned to Purchaser at Closing.  The Assumed
Contract List may be supplemented or revised by the Purchaser at
any time until 10 days prior to the Closing Date.  Within five
business days following the Debtors' receipt of the Assumed
Contract List, the Debtors will serve the Cure Notice.  A party in
interest may object to the proposed assumption and assignment by
filing an objection to the Motion by the date specified in the Cure
Notice.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Sept. 17, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.
(CDT).  The objection deadline is Sept. 4, 2018 at 4:00 p.m.
(CDT).

A copy of the APA attached to the Motion is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/4_West_27_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser:

          Steven Lebowitz
          SC-GA 2018 PARTNERS, LLC
          4 West Red Oak Lane, Suite 201
          White Plains, NY 10604

                       About 4 West Holdings

4 West Holdings, Inc., et al. -- http://www.orianna.com/-- are
licensed operators of 41 skilled nursing facilities and manage on
skilled nursing facility located in seven states: Georgia, Indiana,
Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and
Virginia.  In addition, one of related entity, Palladium Hospice
and Palliative Care, LLC f/k/a Ark Hospice, LLC provides hospice
and palliative care services at certain of the Facilities and other
third party locations.  They employ approximately 5,000 people,
including but not limited to, nurses, nursing assistants, social
workers, regional directors and supervisors.

4 West Holdings, Inc., and 134 of its affiliates and subsidiaries
filed voluntary petitions in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas in Dallas seeking relief under the
provisions of Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Lead Case No. 18-30777) on March 6, 2018, with a restructuring
plan that contemplates the transfer of 22 facilities to new
operations.

The Debtors continue to operate their businesses and manage their
properties as debtors-in-possession.  4 West Holdings estimated $10
million to $50 million in assets and $50 million to $100 million in
liabilities as of the filing.

The Hon. Harlin DeWayne Hale is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped DLA Piper LLP (US) as bankruptcy counsel;
Houlihan Lokey as investment banker; Crowe Horwath LLP as financial
advisor; Ankura Consulting Group, LLC, as interim management
services provider; and Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy as claims
agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on March 19, 2018, appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee tapped
Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP as its legal counsel, and CohnReznick
LLP as its financial advisor.


AEROCHAMPION GYMNASTICS: Taps CCG as Financial Advisor
------------------------------------------------------
AeroChampion Gymnastics & Sports, Inc., seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey to hire
Columbia Consulting Group, PLLC as its financial advisor.

The firm will assist the Debtor in securing debtor-in-possession
financing or exit financing; negotiate with creditors; assist in
the preparation of a plan of reorganization; and provide other
financial advisory services related to its Chapter 11 case.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

     Jeffrey Worley       $295
     Staff Accountant      $75
     Director             $195
     Controller Level     $125

Columbia Consulting is a "disinterested person" as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jeffrey A. Worley
     Columbia Consulting Group, PLLC
     6101 Long Prairie Road Suite 744, MB 17
     Flower Mound, TX 75028
     Phone: 972-809-6393
     Email: jworley@ccgpllc.net

                   About Aerochampion Gymnastics

AeroChampion Gymnastics & Sports, Inc., filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-22999) on June 27,
2018, disclosing under $1 million in assets and liabilities.  The
Debtor is represented by Herbert K. Ryder, Esq., Law Offices of
Herbert K. Ryder LLC.


AIAD SAMUEL: Judge McManus Junks 2nd Recusal Bid
------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Michael S. McManus denies Debtor Aiad Samuel's
second motion for recusal. The motion, except for the several
issues largely repeats issues raised in the prior recusal motions.

The new issues raised by Mr. Samuel do not show a bias or prejudice
against the debtors or in favor of another warranting recusal. Nor
do the newly' raised issues provide some other basis for
disqualification of Judge McManus.

Mr. Samuel complains that the court has not allowed him to
discharge attorney Richard Jare and to retain another attorney.
This is not true.

Until Mr. Samuel's July 17 prior motion to disqualify the court was
filed, no motion had been filed to discharge Mr. Jare as counsel
for Mr. Samuel. On page 4 of the July 17 motion, Mr. Samuel asks to
discharge Mr. Jare. He also makes the request in an objection to
the trustee's proposed plan of reorganization.

However, until it dealt with the first two recusal motions, the
court could not act on any other pending motions in the case. That
is why the court set an August 28 hearing on the other relief
requested in the first two recusal motions and on the confirmation
of the plan. The question of Mr. Jare's discharge as attorney would
have been taken up at that time.

It must also be mentioned that because the debtors were removed as
debtors in possession, they have never needed the court's
permission to retain attorneys to represent their interests. Only
professionals employed by the bankruptcy estate must have their
employment approved.

Mr. Samuel also complains that the court has deprived him of the
financial ability to retain counsel by appointing a trustee to take
charge of the bankruptcy estate.

The court appointed a trustee because the debtors used cash
collateral without court or creditor permission, failed to disclose
all financial information in the bankruptcy schedules and
statements, and failed to open a debtor in possession bank account
as required by Local Bankruptcy Rule 20 15-2 (a).

While the appointment of the trustee placed the property of the
estate in the hands of the trustee, the trustee has not prevented
the debtors from using Mr. Samuel's employment income or their
substantial retirement accounts to retain attorneys or for any
other purpose.

But, even if the appointment of the trustee meant that the debtors
could not afford an attorney, the court did not appoint a trustee
in order to prevent the debtors from retaining one. A trustee was
appointed because the debtors had shown themselves to be poor
stewards of the bankruptcy estate.

Mr. Samuel also asserts that the trustee offered $2 million to the
debtors to withdraw their objections to "the Trustee's activities."
This allegation has not previously been made, much less
substantiated. The court assumes it will be made in connection with
the motion to remove the trustee and it will be dealt with in that
context. In the meantime, it is not a basis for recusal of the
court.

Mr. Samuel's second recusal motion is therefore denied. Mr. Samuel
is and has been free to retain whatever legal counsel he selects.
His other complaints continue to center on the appointment of the
trustee and the trustee's administration of the bankruptcy estate,
including the sales proposed by the trustee and approved by the
court.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum dated August 23, 2018 is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/caeb16-21585-1174.pdf

                     About the Samuels

Aiad Samuel and Hoda Samuel filed a voluntary petition under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No.
16-21585) on March 15, 2016.

The Debtors' principal business enterprise is real estate
management and leasing.

On May 10, 2016, the Court approved the appointment of Scott M.
Sackett as the Chapter 11 Trustee for the Debtors' Estate.  The
Chapter 11 Trustee is represented by Donald W. Fitzgerald, Esq.,
and Jason E. Rios, Esq., at Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby &
Pascuzzi LLP, in Sacramento, California.


ALLY FINANCIAL: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' LT IDR, Outlook Positive
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Ally Financial's (Ally) Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) at 'BB+' and Short-Term IDR at 'B'. The Rating
Outlook remains Positive.

The rating actions have been taken as part of Fitch's periodic peer
review of U.S. consumer finance companies, which comprises four
publicly rated firms.

KEY RATING DRIVERS - IDRs, VRs, AND SENIOR DEBT

The rating affirmation reflects Ally's strong franchise, leading
market position in the U.S. auto finance industry, solid credit
quality, diverse funding base, ample liquidity, adequate
risk-adjusted capitalization and seasoned management team. Primary
rating constraints include weaker profitability and higher usage of
wholesale funding sources relative to more highly rated bank peers.
Additional rating constraints include Ally's concentrated and
cyclical business model and higher pricing sensitivity on
internet-sourced deposits during a sustained period of rising
interest rates.

The Positive Rating Outlook reflects Fitch's expectations for a
continued funding mix shift toward retail deposits relative to less
stable and higher cost funding sources, improved loan yields as the
company repositions its retail auto portfolio toward more used
vehicles and non-subvented channels, manageable increases in
deposit pricing relative to Fed interest rate hikes, stable credit
performance as higher loss vintages amortize, and continued
measured expansion of Ally's non-auto business segments over the
medium term. Fitch also views Ally's moderate asset growth
favorably given heightened competition in the auto finance sector.

While Ally experienced an improvement in net income and EPS growth
over the past year, this was primarily driven by a lower tax rate
stemming from corporate tax reform legislation passed in December
2017 and a reduced share count from an increase in share repurchase
activity. On a pre-tax basis, core ROA has remained fairly stable
over the past few years at roughly 1%. However, risk-adjusted
yields in its retail auto segment have gradually improved as
pricing has increased on new loans and credit losses have
stabilized. Funding cost improvement will be a key input into
future profitability as Ally has over $5.9 billion of unsecured
debt maturities through 2020 that have a weighted average coupon
significantly above the company's current cost of retail deposits.
Fitch expects the company will continue to refinance a significant
portion of its unsecured maturities with retail deposits. However,
rising interest rates and recent competitive intensity for online
deposits in particular, may cause the funding cost differential
between Ally's unsecured debt and retail deposits to narrow.

Consumer auto originations in 1H18 grew roughly 9% from the same
period a year ago, as the company expanded into new dealership
channels, while continuing to originate more loans for used
vehicles. Loan originations for used vehicles increased to 51% of
Ally's retail auto origination mix in 2Q18, compared to 47% in 2Q17
and 43% in 2Q16. Management believes that used vehicle financings
provide the best risk-adjusted returns in the current environment.
While the credit scores of borrowers on used vehicles are typically
lower than those of new vehicle borrowers, Fitch believes the
higher risk is potentially mitigated by lower loss severities and
higher yields given a slightly less competitive environment in the
used vehicle market relative to new vehicles.

With a meaningful shift in Ally's loan origination mix occurring
over a relatively short period of time, the underlying credit
performance of more recent vintages remains an important driver of
Ally's ratings. Credit losses on Ally's 2015 and 2016 loan
vintages, while weaker than previous years, have been within a
reasonable range thus far. Further, while the portfolio mix shift
has yielded higher credit losses, Fitch views the reduction in
Ally's lease exposure favorably given Fitch's expectations for
further softness in used vehicle prices.

In June 2018, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. (FCA) announced plans
to establish or acquire a captive finance company by 2022. Ally
derived 27% of its retail auto originations and 30% of its
commercial wholesale volume from Chrysler dealers in 1H18. Although
it is unclear at this stage what implications the establishment of
a captive by FCA would have on Ally's competitive positioning in
the Chrysler dealer channel longer term, Fitch believes it is
unlikely to be financially impactful to Ally's business over the
Outlook horizon.

Ally's credit performance has stabilized over the past year with
retail auto net charge-offs of 1.3% in 1H18, which compared
favorably to 1.4% in 1H17, and is thus far below management's full
year expectation of 1.4%-1.6%, which it now anticipates will be at
the lower end of the range. Ally's retail auto 30+ day
delinquencies increased to 2.78% of loans at 2Q18; up 7 bps from
the year-ago period. The increase in delinquency rate is partly
attributable to the shift in loan mix toward used vehicles, which
are expected to result in higher loss frequency but lower
severities. Reserve coverage is near the mid-point of the current
retail auto charge-off expectation of 1.4%-1.6% for consumer auto
loans and 1.5x annualized net charge-offs at June 30, 2018. Fitch
believes Ally's improved credit performance has been aided to a
large degree by underwriting adjustments made by the company,
continued contraction of the higher loss 2015/2016 vintages in
relation to the overall portfolio, as well as positive
macroeconomic factors including a stabilization in used vehicle
prices.

In addition to the stabilization in Ally's credit performance, the
company has experienced further declines in lease residual
exposure. Ally's net auto lease portfolio has more than halved from
$19.5 billion at the end of 2014 to $8.6 billion at the end of
2Q18, although the lease portfolio is expected to stabilize around
current levels. Fitch views the reduction in Ally's lease residual
exposure favorably given the expectation for further declines in
used vehicle prices over the next couple of years despite recent
stabilization.

Ally has a diverse mix of funding sources. At June 30, 2018,
deposits represented 64% of Ally's total funding, with secured debt
accounting for 25% and unsecured debt accounting for 11%.
Short-term wholesale funding, including $3.5 billion of unsecured
demand notes, represented only 5% of Ally's total funding at June
30, 2018. Ally is targeting for deposits to represent 70%-75% of
funding over the medium term. Ally's deposit growth over the past
couple of years through a Fed tightening cycle has been stronger
than expectations, although the competitive environment for online
deposits has become more intense recently, which coupled with
competition from higher yielding fixed income and equity products
may have, in part, contributed to a flattening of Ally's sequential
deposit growth in 2Q18.

Although Ally's deposit beta on a cumulative basis remains within
the company's 30%-50% medium-term expectations, Fitch has yet to
see a meaningful repricing of brick and mortar banks' retail
deposits and have also begun to see digital bank carve-outs by some
of the largest U.S. banks, which could further fuel competitive
intensity for retail deposits. Stronger competitive responses from
traditional banks in terms of offered deposit rates, over a full
interest rate and economic cycle, also need to be observed before
the durability of Ally's internet deposits can be fully assessed.
Nonetheless, Fitch views Ally's diverse funding strategy favorably
as it reduces funding concentration risk and provides more
flexibility in the event that wholesale funding sources
(securitization and public debt markets) dry up or become cost
prohibitive, or if the online deposit platform experiences material
outflows in a rising interest rate environment.

Ally maintains adequate liquidity with $16.8 billion of total
consolidated liquidity (excluding $2.9 billion of undrawn credit
facilities) at the end of 2Q18. This compared to unsecured debt
maturities of $2.8 billion over the next 12 months. Fitch views
unused credit line capacity as an additional liquidity source, but
potentially less reliable than cash or high-quality liquid assets,
given that it generally requires eligible assets to collateralize
incremental funding. However, Ally's loan portfolio is mostly
unencumbered reflecting the company's high mix of deposit and
unsecured funding, suggesting a higher likelihood the credit
facilities could be drawn upon during periods of stress.

Ally remains well capitalized, as reflected by Basel III
Transitional Tier I capital and Tier I common ratios of 11.1% and
9.4%, respectively, as of June 30, 2018. The company estimates that
the fully phased-in Basel III Tier I common ratio was 9.4% at June
30, 2018, roughly flat with the year ago period. Fitch views the
company's capital position as adequate given the risk profile of
its balance sheet.

On June 28, 2018, Ally received a non-objection on its capital plan
from the Fed as part of the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and
Review (CCAR) process. This resulted in Ally increasing its
quarterly cash dividend to $0.15 per share from $0.13 per share and
authorizing a share repurchase program of up to $1 billion of
common stock over the four quarters ended June 30, 2019, a 32%
increase from the previous authorization of $760 million. Although
this level of shareholder payout relative to net income is
consistent with other large banks, Fitch expects this will result
in fairly stable regulatory capital ratios for the company over the
near term, given expectations for modest asset growth and an
improving earnings trajectory.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

Ally's subordinated debt rating is one notch below Ally's Viability
Rating (VR) of 'bb+' in accordance with Fitch's assessment of each
instrument's respective non-performance and relative loss severity
risk profile. The subordinated note rating includes one notch for
loss severity given the subordination of these securities in the
capital structure, and zero notches for non-performance given
contractual limitations on interest payment deferrals and no
mandatory trigger events which could adversely impact performance.


The rating assigned to the trust preferred securities, series 2
issued out of GMAC Capital Trust I is 'b+', three notches below
Ally's VR. The rating reflects the subordination of the securities
and Ally's option to defer coupon payments, and is in accordance
with Fitch's assessment of each instrument's respective
non-performance and relative loss severity risk profile.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

Ally has a Support Rating of '5' and Support Rating Floor of 'NF'.
In Fitch's view, Ally is not systemically important, and therefore
the probability of sovereign support is unlikely. Ally's IDRs and
VRs do not incorporate any support.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Ally's ratings could be upgraded if retail deposit growth continues
on a positive trajectory that is consistent with management's
medium-term target for deposits representing 70%-75% of overall
funding and credit performance on its more recent loan vintages
remains stable. A ratings upgrade will also be contingent upon
Ally's ability to retain online deposit customers in a
cost-effective manner in a rising rate environment, which will be a
key consideration in evaluating the strength of its funding profile
relative to traditional bank models.

A revision of the Outlook back to Stable from Positive could occur
if Ally's deposit growth stalls or if its deposit pricing rises to
a level at which it negatively impacts the company's margins and
profitability. More meaningful negative ratings actions could be
driven by a reversion in profitability, meaningful deterioration in
asset quality relative to peers, a sharp reduction in capital and
liquidity levels, an inability to access the capital markets for
funding on reasonable terms, and/or the issuance of potential new
and more onerous regulations that negatively impact Ally's business
model.

With respect to Ally's asset quality, Fitch remains focused on the
credit performance of the company's consumer auto portfolio
following the shift toward alternate origination channels, such as
used vehicle loan originations, and away from GM lease subvention
during a period when the competitive environment has been intense.
Although Ally's exposure to residual value risk has declined
sharply with the reduction in subvented lease volume, to the extent
that a higher risk profile for Ally's auto loan portfolio is not
counterbalanced by higher yields and/or lower residual exposure,
Ally's ratings or Outlook could be pressured.

Similarly, Ally's rollout of new product initiatives such as
residential mortgages, credit card, and retail brokerage, while
viewed as a positive ratings driver from a revenue diversification
aspect, also create other risks including increased reliance on
third-party execution and reputational risk that could result in
ratings and Outlook pressure over time.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

The subordinated debt ratings are directly linked to Ally's VR and
would be expected to move in tandem with any changes in the VR.

The preferred stock ratings are directly linked to Ally's VR and
would be expected to move in tandem with any changes in Ally's
credit profile.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

Since Ally's Support and Support Rating Floors are '5' and 'NF',
respectively, there is limited likelihood that these ratings will
change over the foreseeable future.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Ally Financial Inc.

  -- Long-term IDR at 'BB+';

  -- Senior unsecured debt at 'BB+';

  -- Viability Rating at 'bb+';

  -- Subordinated debt at 'BB';

  -- Short-term IDR at 'B';

  -- Short-term debt at 'B';

  -- Support rating at '5';

  -- Support Floor at 'NF'.

GMAC Capital Trust I

  -- Trust preferred securities, series 2 at 'B+'.

The Rating Outlook is Positive.


ALPHABET HOLDING: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B-' issuer credit rating on
Ronkonkoma, N.Y.-based Alphabet Holding Company Inc. The outlook is
negative.

S&P said, "At the same time, we affirmed our 'B+' issue-level
rating on the company's $350 million senior secured ABL due 2022,
our 'B-' issue-level rating on its $1.5 billion senior secured
first-lien term loan due 2024, and our 'CCC' issue-level rating on
its $400 million senior secured second-lien term loan due 2025. The
recovery rating on the ABL remains '1', reflecting our expectation
for very high (90% to 100%, rounded estimate: 95%) recovery in the
event of a payment default. The recovery rating on the first-lien
term loan remains '3', reflecting our expectation for meaningful
(50% to 70%, rounded estimate: 50%) recovery in the event of a
payment default. The recovery rating on the second-lien term loan
remains '6', reflecting our expectation for negligible (0% to 10%,
rounded estimate: 0%) recovery in the event of a payment default.

"We estimate total debt outstanding at June 30, 2018, is about $1.9
billion.

"The rating affirmation reflects our expectation that credit
metrics will improve modestly over the next year, but remain very
weak. It also incorporates our expectation for modestly negative
free cash flow in fiscal 2019 due to strategic initiatives and
further restructuring under new leadership. Management is
reorganizing Alphabet's research and development (R&D) department,
building out its salesforce, repositioning certain brands
(particularly in its weak performing sports and active nutrition
portfolio), and further rationalizing its supply chain and
manufacturing footprint. While management expects the manufacturing
footprint optimization efforts to deliver meaningful cost savings,
it is driving other initiatives to improve innovation and marketing
and better differentiate Alphabet's brands. We believe one of
management's key goals is to reduce the company's reliance on
promotional activity to drive sales growth. We believe the company
will continue to incur significant costs for these initiatives over
the next year with limited near term benefit. While we expect
operating performance to improve modestly, we believe profitability
will remain pressured over the next year as the company works
through the restructuring and continues to compete in an intensely
promotional environment. As a result, we forecast leverage will
remain above 9x through fiscal year end 2019. Notwithstanding weak
cash flow in the near term, we believe the company has sufficient
liquidity, including significant availability under its ABL, to
support its restructuring activities.

"The negative outlook reflects the risk of a lower rating over the
next 12 months if operating performance further weakens and if
Alphabet's capital structure becomes, in our view, unsustainable
over the long term. We could lower the rating if EBITDA interest
coverage falls below 1.5x or if ABL borrowings increase to well
above $50 million on a sustained basis and we view them as a
permanent source of financing, as this could be indicative of the
company's inability to meet its debt service obligations. This
could occur if the company fails to realize cost savings as
expected on strategic initiatives, incurs higher-than expected
restructuring costs, fails to achieve revenue growth (including
lower trade spend) on its elevated marketing and R&D investment, or
loses further business with key customers. Intensifying competition
in the highly fragmented industry, including from private label,
remains a significant risk.

"While unlikely over the next 12 months, we could revise the
outlook to stable if the company generates positive free cash flow
on a consistent basis, margins improve, and ABL draws are reduced.
We would also need to have confidence that management's
restructuring plans are gaining traction."



ALSTRAW ENTERPRISES: Selling 3 Virginia Coin Laundries for $269K
----------------------------------------------------------------
Alstraw Enterprises, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia to authorize the sale to Nilraj
Chudasama of three coin laundries in (i) Dumfries, Virginia known
as "Plaza Coin Laundry" for $66,000; (ii) Herndon, Virginia known
as the "The Herndon Coin Laundry" for $110,000; and (ii) Manassas,
Virginia known as "Don's Wash" for $93,000.

The Debtor operates four coin laundries at separate locations,
including Dulles Park, Herndon, Dumfries and Manassas.  Each of
these businesses occupies leased space and some have different
names under which they do business.  The Dumfries location is known
as "Plaza Coin Laundry," Herndon is known as the "The Herndon Coin
Laundry," and the Manassas location is known as "Don's Wash."

After a commercially reasonable advertising campaign by Auction
Markets, LLC, the Debtor has received an offer for the purchase of
the Dumfries and Herndon businesses from Jennifer Eubanks, which
includes payment of $60,000 for the Dumfries location and $100,000
for the Herndon location.  These offers are severable, meaning that
both or any one separately may be approved, but should one offer
not be approved for any reason, the remaining offer may be.

After the Eubanks offer for the Dumfries and Herndon locations was
received, and a Motion and Notice was filed asking for its
approval, a second offer was received from the Buyer for all three
locations, including an offer of $66,000 for the Dumfries location,
$110,000 for the Herndon location, and $93,000 for the Manassas
location.  The sale will be free and clear of all liens, claims and
adverse interests.  The offer is in the form of an Asset Purchase
Agreement.

The APA contemplates the assignment of all leasehold rights, and
sale of all of the Debtor's assets, tangible and intangible, at the
Dumfries, Manassas, and Herndon locations, including, but not
limited to, washing machines, dryers, coin machines, vending
machines, fixtures and the like, in addition to the Debtor's good
will and business name associated with the Herndon, Manassas, and
Dumfries locations.  These offers are severable, meaning that all
of them, or any one separately may be approved, but should one
offer not be approved for any reason, the remaining offer(s) may
be.

The Debtor's principal, Arjen Weiss, and not the Debtor Alstraw, is
the tenant on the leases for the Dumfries and the Manassas
locations.  Mr. Weiss will cooperate and do all that may be
necessary to transfer his lease rights to the Buyer.  However, the
APA is subject to a number of contingencies, including an
acceptance of the Buyer by the landlord for each location,
including the Dumfries and Manassas locations.

The leases for the Herndon, and Manassas locations are in arrears.
The lease arrearage for the Manassas location is, upon information
and belief, in excess of $83,000.

Under the terms of Mr. Karbelk's employment, he is entitled to a
10% commission paid at settlement on all assets sold through his
efforts, and the recovery of marketing expenses of up to $3,000 for
each sale.  The commission on the sale would be split between
Stephen Karbelk/Auction Markets, LLC, the estate's agent, and
Horizon Business Brokers, LLC, the Buyer's agent.  At the same
time, it is anticipated that not more than $3,000 in expenses for
professional photographs, DropBox Due Diligence Room, and Constant
Contact email marketing will be payable on the sale to Auction
Markets, LLC at the time of closing.

To the extent that funds are available, any lease arrearage for any
of the locations would be cured at the time of settlement on the
sale of that location.  There are no liens against the Debtor, nor
any encumbrances on the assets to be sold under the APA.

The Debtor cannot operate the Herndon, Manassas, or Dumfries
locations profitably, and their sale would reduce its operating
loss and provide it funds which will enable it to file a Plan of
Reorganization.  It submits that, at the time the Motion is filed,
the Chudasama offer and APA represents the best price obtainable
for these assets, and the best result for the estate and the
creditors at this time.

A copy of the APA attached to the Motion is available for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Alstraw_Enterprises_89_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser:

         Nilraj Chudasama
         P.O. Box 537
         Dumfries, VA 22026

                  About Alstraw Enterprises

Alstraw Enterprises, Inc. operates four coin laundries at separate
locations, including Dulles Park, Herndon, Dumfries and Manassas.
Each of these businesses occupy leased space and some have
different names under which they do business, the Dumfries location
being known as "Plaza Coin Laundry" and Herndon being known as the
"The Herndon Coin Laundry."

Alstraw Enterprises, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 18-11430) on April 23, 2018.  

The Debtor hired Richard G. Hall, as counsel.  Stephen Karbelk of
Auction Markets, LLC was appointed as the sales agent for the
Debtor on July 12, 2018.  Scott W. Miller of Analytic Financial
Group, LLC was appointed as a financial advisor for the Debtor
retroactively to June 15, 2018, on July 17, 2018.


AMERICAN GREEN: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
---------------------------------------------------
Alleged Debtor:        American Green Technology Inc.
                          aka AGT
                          aka American Green Technology TM
                       52129 St. Rt. 933
                       South Bend, Indiana 46637

Business Description:  Founded in 2009, American Green Technology
                       Inc. -- http://americangreentechnology.com
                       -- is a manufacturer of lighting products
                       for the heavy industry and healthcare
                       sector.  The Company offers AGT led flat
                       panels, AGT led floodlight, AGT led linear
                       high bay, AGT led slim canopy, AGT led
                       troffer, AGT led traditional wallpack,
                       AGT led lamps, AGT led corn light,
                       AGT led vapor tight and more.
                       American Green is headquartered in South
                       Bend, Indiana.

Involuntary Chapter
11 Petition Date:      August 28, 2018

Case Number:           18-34728

Court:                 United States Bankruptcy Court
                       Southern District of Texas (Houston)

Petitioners' Counsel:  Deirdre Carey Brown, Esq.
                       HOOVER SLOVACEK LLP
                       5051 Westheimer, Suite 1200
                       Houston, Texas 77056
                       Tel: 713-977-8686
                       E-mail: brown@hooverslovacek.com

Alleged creditors who signed the involuntary petition:

   Name                        Nature of Claim  Claim Amount
   ----                        ---------------  ------------
Airguide Mfg MS, LLC                Lease -     $269,401 +
795 W 20th Street              Rent, Utilities  int./fees
Hialeah, FL 33010

Lai Family Investments, Inc.        Note        $125,000 +
2406 Delmonte Drive                             int./fees
Houston, TX 77019

Dave Peterson                       Note        $100,000 +
11721 Hunters Green Trail                       int./fees
Austin, TX 78732

A full-text copy of the Involuntary Petition is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb18-34729.pdf


ASP MCS ACQUISITION: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B-', Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on Lewisville,
Texas-based ASP MCS Acquisition Corp. (MCS) to 'B-' from 'B'. The
outlook is stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we lowered the issue-level rating on
the company's first-lien debt to 'B-' from 'B'. The recovery rating
remains '3', indicating our expectation of meaningful recovery
(50%-70%; rounded estimate: 55%) in the event of a payment
default.

"The downgrade reflects our view of MCS' high adjusted leverage
(projected above 7.5x for the next 12 months), recent customer
losses, and modest margin deterioration.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that despite recent
customer losses, MCS' leading market position and variable cost
structure can somewhat mitigate the recent steep decline in
revenues, although we see debt-to-EBITDA rising to approximately 8x
by year-end 2018. In addition, we expect the company will continue
to generate positive cash flow to reinvest in the business given
its low capital spending requirements.

"We could lower our rating over the next 12 months if MCS loses
another top customer, if strategic missteps result in negative
FOCF, or if we consider the capital structure to be unsustainable.
This could occur from lower margins as a result of prolonged
elevated chargeback expenses, failed cost savings initiatives, or
an unexpected event such as an acquisition or some other
reputation-damaging event resulting in the loss of a major client.

"Although unlikely over the next 12 months, we could raise our
rating if the company stabilizes its operating performance by
growing organic revenues and expanding margins. To receive
consideration for an upgrade, MCS' key credit metrics would also
need to show meaningful improvement, such that debt-to-EBITDA
declines to and remains below 7x."



AUBURN ARMATURE: Letter Agreement Between Trust, AAI and UEP Valid
------------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiff Vincent Crisafulli Testamentary Trust brings the action
captioned VINCENT CRISAFULLI TESTAMENTARY TRUST, Plaintiff, v. AAI
ACQUISITION, LLC and UNITED ELECTRIC POWER, INC., Defendants,
6784-17 (N.Y. Sup.) to enforce the terms of an alleged commercial
lease and guarantee. Plaintiff seeks to recover money damages from
AAI Acquisition, LLC, as the alleged lessee, and United Electric
Power, Inc., as the alleged guarantor. Following some paper
discovery, plaintiff moves for summary judgment on its verified
complaint alleging three contractual causes of action: (1) breach
of the Letter Agreement; (2) breach of the guarantee provision of
the Letter Agreement; and (3) breach of the assumed Lease.

Upon careful review, the Supreme Court, Albany County grants
plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the first cause of
action, denies its motion seeking summary judgment on the second
cause of action, and dismisses its third cause of action.

For its first cause of action, the Trust seeks to recover for
Acquisition's alleged breaches of the Letter Agreement. In opposing
this branch of the motion, defendants make two principal arguments:
(1) the Letter Agreement is not a binding contract; and (2) the
Letter Agreement did not become effective due to the nonoccurrence
of a condition precedent.

Upon analysis, the Court is satisfied that plaintiff has
demonstrated that the Letter Agreement is a valid and binding
contract that is sufficiently definite in its material terms and
otherwise complies with the Statute of Frauds.

The Court further concludes that the Letter Agreement sets forth
the material terms of the parties' agreement with reasonable
certainty. The Letter Agreement describes the demised Premises,
states that the new lease would be on the same terms and conditions
as the prior Lease, except as otherwise modified therein, and then
sets forth the modified terms and conditions of the new lease. And
while the parties contemplated supplementation of the Letter
Agreement via formalized "legal documents approved by counsel," the
Letter Agreement sets forth all of the essential terms of a lease
agreement, and defendants have not identified any missing terms
that were material to the transaction. That the Letter Agreement
"stated that a more formal contract was to be signed does not
render [it] unenforceable."

The Trust has demonstrated that the Letter Agreement is a valid and
binding contract, and defendants have failed to raise a triable
issue of fact or legal defense to this branch of the motion.

The Court concludes that plaintiff has demonstrated its entitlement
to summary judgment on its first cause of action and to an award of
damages in the sum of $193,350.23, representing the difference
between the rent obligations owed by Acquisition under the Letter
Agreement and the amount of rent paid by the new tenant. Plaintiff
has further demonstrated its entitlement to an award of counsel
fees relative to the first cause of action, which will be
determined at the conclusion of the litigation.

The second cause of action seeks recovery against United Inc.
pursuant to the alleged Guaranty. The Court concludes that the
present record is insufficiently developed to warrant a grant of
summary judgment on the second cause of action. The Trust bears the
ultimate burden of establishing that United Electric, a
non-signatory to the Letter Agreement, manifested a clear intention
to bind itself to the Guaranty and that defendants should be
estopped from denying the liability of United Electric as
guarantor. While the limited proof adduced by the Trust in support
of its motion provides some support for finding United Electric
liable under the Guaranty, the present record falls short of
demonstrating plaintiff's entitlement to judgment as a matter of
law.

Based on this, the branch of plaintiff's motion seeking summary
judgment on the second cause of action is denied, without prejudice
to renewal on a fuller and firmer factual record following the
completion of all discovery.

Finally, the Trust moves for summary judgment on its third cause of
action, seeking recovery under the assumed Lease. Given the Court's
conclusion that the Letter Agreement is a valid and binding
contract that superseded the original Lease, plaintiff cannot
obtain recovery under the original Lease. In light of the
foregoing, the Court exercises its discretion to search the record
and dismisses the third cause of action.

A copy of the Court's Decision dated August 10, 2018 is available
at https://bit.ly/2P8VXPM from Leagle.com.

Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman LLP, ( Robert E. Ganz, of counsel),
One Columbia Circle, Albany, New York 12203, Attorneys for
Plaintiff.

Robert J. Ansell, Esq. , 270 Park Avenue, New Hyde Park, New York
11040, General Counsel to AAI Acquisition, LLC and United Electric
Power s/h/a United Electric Power, Inc.

                     About Auburn Armature

Based in Auburn, New York, Auburn Armature Inc. --
http://www.aainy.com/-- along with affiliates EASA Acquisition I,
LLC, and EASA Acquisition II, LLC, operates an electric motor
repair service and electrical equipment distribution network in New
York including Binghamton, Rochester, Syracuse, Albany, Auburn, and
Buffalo.

AAI is the sole member of both EASA I and EASA II.  All of AAI's
outstanding stock is owned by Electrical Supply Acquisition, Inc.,
which in turn is owned by DeltaPoint Capital IV, LP and DeltaPoint
Capital IV (New York), LP.

AAI, EASA I and EASA II sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
N.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-30743) on May 19, 2017.  Geoffrey L.
Murphy, president & CEO, signed the petitions.  AAI estimated $10
million to $50 million in assets and debt.

Judge Margaret M. Cangilos-Ruiz presides over the case.  

Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece, P.C., serves as counsel to the
Debtors.  League Park Advisors is the Debtors' investment banker.

On June 1, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The creditors committee
retained Lowenstein Sandler LLP as counsel.


BANCO SANTOS: Judicial Administrator Selling Artworks at Auction
----------------------------------------------------------------
ADJUD Administradores Judiciais LTDA. - EPP, the Court-appointed
Judicial Administrator for the bankruptcy estate of Banco Santos,
S.A. and its Affiliates, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida to conditionally authorize the sales
procedures in connection with the sale of the collection of over 93
pieces of artwork at auction.

In November 2004, the Central Bank of Brazil intervened into the
affairs of Banco Santos, and on Sept. 20, 2005, Judge Oliveira of
the 2nd Bankruptcy and Judicial Reorganization Court of Sao Paulo
ordered Banco Santos into a court-supervised liquidation.  Dr.
Vânio Cesar Pickler Aguiar was appointed as Judicial Administrator
of the Estate of Banco Santos.

On May 14, 2015, Dr. Vânio Cesar Pickler Aguiar, a partner of
ADJUD Administradores Judiciais LTDA. – EPP, was replaced by
ADJUD Administradores Judiciais LTDA. – EPP as the Judicial
Administrator of the Banco Santos Estate.  Dr. Vânio Cesar Pickler
Aguiar and ADJUD Administradores Judiciais LTDA. – EPP are the
only two Judicial Administrators that have acted in this capacity
for the Banco Santos Estate.

The Brazilian criminal authorities brought criminal charges and
prosecuted a criminal case against the principal of Banco Santos at
the time of its collapse, Edemar Cid Ferreira, certain of his
family members, and other defendants, and requested legal
assistance from the United States in connection with efforts to
forfeit certain Ferreira-linked assets bought with proceeds of his
crimes, including certain works of art.

The United States of America seized and/or forfeited certain
Ferreira-linked assets in the United States based on the Brazilian
request for legal assistance and/or based on independent violations
of U.S. law and whereas the United States of America issued its own
request for mutual legal assistance in connection with the
Ferreira-linked assets, including to the authorities of the United
Kingdom.

The Judicial Administrator has entered into a court-approved
cooperation arrangement with the Brazilian criminal authorities to
pursue and recover the proceeds of Ferreira's crimes outside of
Brazil to which the Banco Santos Estate has asserted claims,
including, among other works of art, the Works of Art, for the
benefit of Banco Santos Estate's creditors.

On Dec. 9, 2010, the Judicial Administrator filed a petition under
Chapter 15 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida.  On Jan. 13,
2011, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court entered an order recognizing the
Brazil Bankruptcy Case of Banco Santos and certain affiliates as a
foreign main proceeding, Case No. 10-bk-47543-LMI.

On April 28, 2015, the recognition order of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court was amended to include recognition of the extended Brazilian
Banco Santos Bankruptcy to include, Broadening Info Enterprises,
Inc., Bokara Corporation, and Wailea Corporation as debtors.

The Judicial Administrator proposes to sell a collection of over 93
pieces of artwork (paintings, photographs, maps, autographed
artwork, sculptures, scrolls, and letters) belonging to the Banco
Santos Estate.  The Property was obtained from the U.S. Government
pursuant to a stipulation approved by the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New York.

The Stipulation approved an agreement related to a mutual legal
assistance treaty request from the Brazilian criminal authorities
with whom the Judicial Administrator has a cooperation agreement to
the U.S. authorities, which led to the seizure of the artwork
several years ago.  The court-approved Stipulation resulted in
turnover of the Property to the Judicial Administrator to sell for
the benefit of the Estate and its creditors.

The Property will be sold through competitive bidding auctions by
Sotheby's and Heritage Auctions.  Sotheby's will sell 24 pieces of
the Property and charge no commission to the Estate, but will
charge a customary buyer's premium to prospective purchasers.
Heritage will sell 69 pieces of the Property and charge no
commission to the Estate, but will charge a customary buyer's
premium to prospective purchasers, which encompasses all fees,
costs, insurance, photographing, and cataloguing.  The Brokers will
accept bids from the public for the Property listed for auction
until the Brokers receive the highest and best bid available.  If
the agreed upon reserve price for each piece of Property is met,
then it will qualify as the final auction Sales price for that
piece of Property.

Since the Sales are subject to competitive bidding, the ultimate
purchaser is unknown at this time.  The Judicial Administrator
provides the warranties that the successful bidder will receive the
Property free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances, and
interests after the Sale.  For each of the Sales, the minimum
qualified bid and minimum incremental bid will vary based on the
piece of Property and auction.  There are no known documentation
requirements for competing bidders or purchasers.  There are no
known lienholders for the Property.

On March 13, 2018, the Judicial Administrator filed a motion asking
approval of the Sales and bid procedures related to the Sotheby's
Agreement from the Brazilian Bankruptcy Court.  After receiving no
objection from any creditors of the Estate, on March 22, 2018, the
Brazilian Bankruptcy Court approved.

On July 13, 2018, the Judicial Administrator filed a motion asking
approval for Heritage to sell the remaining 69 pieces of Property
and asking entry of an Order: (i) approving the Heritage Agreement
and Sales procedures through competitive bidding auctions, which in
the Judicial Administrator's business judgment will produce the
highest and best offers; (ii) ordering notification by publication
in the Official Gazette (Diário Oficial) of the Brazilian
Bankruptcy Court's Order.  On Aug. 10, 2018, the Brazilian
Bankruptcy Court granted the Brazilian Heritage Motion and
authorized the Heritage Agreement.

The Judicial Administrator intends to ask from the Brazilian
Bankruptcy Court a further order that will: (i) order notification
by publication in the Official Gazette (Diário Oficial) of the
U.S. Approval Order sought through this Motion; and (ii) direct all
parties in interest to file objections with this Court as to the
U.S. Approval Order or Sales Prices within the time set forth by
the Court.

Through the Motion, the Judicial Administrator asks that the Court
enter an Order: (i) approving the Sales free and clear of all
liens, claims, encumbrances and interests through the competitive
bidding auctions, which in the Judicial Administrator's business
judgment will produce the highest and best offers; (ii) authorizing
the Sales Agreements; (iii) approving the form and means of notice
of the Sales of the Property to the creditors and parties in
interest of the Banco Santos Estate by publication in the Official
Gazette (Diário Oficial); (iv) setting an objection period of 21
days after notice is published in which parties in interest may
file with this Court any objection to the U.S. Approval Order and
the Sales; and (vi) scheduling the Final Hearing.
A copy of the Orders, the Agreements, and the list of artworks to
be sold attached to the Motion is available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Banco_Santos_192_Sales.pdf

                    About Banco Santos

Vanio Cesar Pickler Aguiar, as foreign representative for Sao
Paulo, Brazil-based Banco Santos S.A., filed a Chapter 15 petition
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 10-47543) in Miami, Florida.

The Chapter 15 petition estimates that the Debtor has assets of
US$500 million to US$1 billion and debts of more than
US$1 billion.  Gregory S. Grossman, Esq., in Miami, Florida,
represents the Trustee in the Chapter 15 case.  The Trustee is also
represented by:

          Astigarraga Davis, Esq.
          MULLINS & GROSSMAN P.A.
          701 Brickell Avenue, 16th Floor
          Miami, Florida 33131
          Tel: (305) 372-8282
          Fax: (305) 372-8202
          E-mail: ggrossman@astidavis.com
                  edavis@astidavis.com


BLAIR OIL: Trustee Selling Interest in Duda Lease for $82K
----------------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey A. Weinman, Chapter 7 Trustee of the bankruptcy estate of
Peter H. Blair, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Colorado to authorize the sale of BOI's royalty interest in the oil
and gas lease between United States of America, Bureau of Land
Management and Marcus V. Duda to McCulliss Oil & Gas, Inc. for
$81,751.

The Trustee is informed and believes that BOI is the owner of an
overriding royalty interest in the Duda Lease.  BOI has
investigated the nature and extent of these Duda Lease.  BOI owns
100% of the Duda Lease.  It receives regular dividends from the
Duda Lease.  As the owner of the Duda Lease, BOI believes that the
Royalty carries the potential for a significant risk to the
bankruptcy estate.  BOI desires to minimize the risks to the
bankruptcy estate and the potential for future liability.  As a
result, it has determined that it is in the Estate's and the
creditors' best interest to sell the Duda Lease.

To that end, BOI and the Buyer have entered into a Contract of Sale
for the Duda Lease.  Under the terms of the Contract of Sale, the
Buyer will purchase all of the Estates' right, title and interest
in the Duda Lease (including all wells and production equipment,
oil and gas fixtures and personal property), for the price of
$81,751.  The sale is without warranty of title ether express or
implied and is "as ios, where is."  

The Buyer is also assuming all liabilities with regard to
operations on the Duda Lease, including any and all environmental
issues which may or might arise subsequent to closing, including
but not limited to, any liability arising under or in any way
related to the Comprehensive Environment Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act of 1980.  The sale to the Buyer is conditioned on
an order from the Court approving the sale.

To the best of the BOI's knowledge, there are no persons or parties
who hold a prior properly perfected liens or encumbrances in the
Duda Lease.  It asks authority to sell the Duda Lease outside the
ordinary course of business and free and clear of any liens and
other interests in such property of entities other than the estate
if any, to the Buyer, pursuant to the Contract of Sale for the sum
of $81,751.

The BOI has investigated the value of the Duda Lease, including the
long term value, as well as the production value of the interest
should the price of oil and/or natural gas rise over time.  Based
upon its investigation, it believes that $81,751 is the highest and
best price for the Duda Lease.

Based upon the BOI's investigation, the Estate will incur certain
customary closing costs as part of the sale of the Duda Lease to
the Buyer.  Specifically, its proportionate share of operating
expenses for the months prior to June 1, 2018, property taxes owing
for 2017.  It also believes that there will be sales taxes of 5.9%
on the personal property and equipment conveyed with the sale,
which will be approximately $1,776.  As it negotiated directly with
the Buyer for the purchase of the Duda Lease, BOI has not incurred
any commissions or other broker fees.

BOI asks authority to pay all related closing costs, including
taxes, from the purchase price as part of the sale of the Duda
Lease to the Buyer.  Such costs would be an administrative expense
of the Estate subject to priority.

It also asks that the Court lifts the 14-day stay provided by Fed.
R. Bankr. P.  6004(h).

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Blair_Oil_290_Sales.pdf

                 About Blair Oil Investments

Blair Oil Investments, LLC, is the owner of an interest in certain
oil and gas leases with wells and production equipment, oil and gas
fixtures and personal property located in Yuma County, Colorado.
It also owns 117 other interests in other oil and gas interests.

Blair Oil Investments sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Col.
Case No. 15-15009) May 7, 2015.  The Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities in the range of $1 million to $10 million.  The Debtor
tapped Harvey Sender, Esq., at Sender Wasserman Wadsworth, P.C., as
counsel.

Peter H. Blair filed his voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code also on May 7, 2015 (Case No.
15-15008).  On Aug. 20, 2015, Mr. Blair's bankruptcy case was
converted to a case under Chapter 7.  Jeffrey A. Weinman is the
Chapter 7 trustee for Mr. Blair's bankruptcy estate.  Mr. Blair's
bankruptcy estate is the holder of 100% of the membership of BOI.


BNEVMA LLC: Exclusive Solicitation Period Extended Until Dec. 20
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Erik P. Kimball of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida, at the behest of BNEVMA, LLC, has
extended BNEVMA's exclusive period in which to solicit acceptances
ninety days through and including December 20, 2018.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor sought an extension of the exclusivity periods in order to
preserve the Debtor's rights as to exclusivity and to avoid
unnecessarily delay in the progress of its case. On March 26, 2018
the Debtor filed its plan and on April 24, 2018 the Debtor filed
its disclosure statement and the hearing is set for approval of the
disclosure statement on July 25, 2018. Since there were numerous
pending objections to approval of the disclosure statement, the
Debtor believed that the Disclosure Statement and Plan may require
amendments.

                        About BNEVMA LLC

BNEVMA, LLC, a real estate lessor, is the fee simple owner of 14
real estate properties (consisting of condominium units and
townhouses) in Wellington, Palm Beach Gardens, Boynton Beach, Lake
Forth, Boca Raton, North Palm Beach, Royal Palm Beach, Florida,
having an aggregate value of $2.71 million.

BNEVMA sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-13392) on March 23, 2018.

In the petition signed by Nermine Hanna, manager, the Debtor
disclosed $2.71 million in assets and $4.01 million in
liabilities.

Judge Paul G. Hyman, Jr., presides over the case.

BNEVMA tapped Furr and Cohen, P.A., as its legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case.


BTH QUITMAN: Taps Nardiello Law Firm as Special Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
BTH Quitman Hickory LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Nevada to hire Nardiello Law Firm, PLC,
as special counsel.

The firm will represent the Debtor in connection with the ongoing
audit examination and appeal of its 2013 federal income tax
return.

Nardiello is a "disinterested person" as defined in Section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Chad D. Nardiello, Esq.
     Nardiello Law Firm, PLC
     1880 Century Park East, Suite 716
     Century City, CA 90067
     Phone: (310) 201-0123
     Fax: (310) 201-0126
     Email: info@nardiellolaw.com

                    About BTH Quitman Hickory

BTH Quitman Hickory LLC, based in Quitman, Mississippi, is a
privately-held provider of torrefied wood pellets designed to offer
pellets of varying energy content to meet the diverse needs of
potential buyers.  The company's wood pellets focus on innovative
and renewable energy source that can be produced on a commercial
scale, enabling businesses to meet the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own
needs.  BTH Quitman Hickory LLC operates as a subsidiary of New
Biomass Holding LLC.

BTH Quitman Hickory filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on
(Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 17-51375) on Dec. 10, 2017.  In the
petition signed by Neal Smaler, president of managing member BTH
Quitman, LLC, the Debtor disclosed $4.22 million in total assets
and $59.46 million in total liabilities.  Judge Bruce T. Beesley
presides over the case.  Kevin A. Darby, Esq., at Darby Law
Practice, serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


CCS.COM.USA INC: Dismissal of Chapter 11 Case Remains
-----------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Alan S. Trust denied CCS.Com.USA, Inc.'s motion to
reconsider the Court's dismissal of its chapter 11 case.

Here, the Debtor has pointed to no facts or case law that the Court
overlooked in rendering its decision on the motion to dismiss. The
motion to reconsider seems to request a "do-over" of the motion to
dismiss, and the Debtor has failed to provide the Court with any
facts or case law that warrant this. Thus, the Debtor failed to
prove that the Dismissal Order should be altered or amended
pursuant to Rule 59(e).

In addition, the Debtor mistakenly asserts that the Feb. 23, 2018
Order "obligated" the Debtor to file a supporting affidavit by
March 7, 2018, which was the day of the scheduled Ruling
Conference, and that Wheatley's time to file any affidavits was
extended through February 28, 2018. The Debtor then asserts that
because it was unable to file its supporting affidavit on March 7,
2018 due to the court being closed because of the forecasted
weather, and instead filed it on March 8, 2018 in the evening
"[u]pon belatedly receiving a[n ECF] password," the Court should
consider the affidavit filed on March 8, 2018, and vacate the
dismissal. However, the Debtor's error was not filing a permissive
affidavit by the extended deadline of February 28, 2018; there was
no affidavit due by March 7, 2018. The Debtor's alleged inability
to file its supporting affidavit on March 7, 2018 due to weather
has no bearing.

Moreover, the two exhibits Debtor attached to its motion to
reconsider are the Court's Dismissal Order and the Court's E-Mail
to the parties notifying them that the Ruling Conference was
adjourned, neither of which are evidence in support of the Debtor's
mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. The Debtor
also filed additional exhibits under a different docket entry, but
provided no explanation of, let alone referenced, the additional
exhibits in its Motion to Reconsider.

Thus, the Debtor failed to prove that is should be relieved of the
Dismissal Order due to mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or
excusable neglect pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1). Therefore, the Debtor
has failed to satisfy its burden under either Rule 59(e) or Rule
60(b), and thus its Motion to Reconsider lacks legal merit and
should be denied.

A copy of the Court's Order dated August 23, 2018 is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb8-17-77476-52.pdf

CCS.Com.USA, Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-77476) on Dec. 4, 2017.


CHRYSLER LLC: Ct. Junks New Co.'s Bid to Enforce Sale Documents
---------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Stuart M. Bernstein denies New Chrysler's motion
to enforce the Sale Documents in the case captioned SHELLEY
GOODALL, Plaintiff, v. CHRYSLER, INC. and FCA US LLC, Defendant,
Adv. Proc. No. 17-01185 (SMB) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.)

New Chrysler has moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to
state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Court has noted
in connection with similar motions filed in other cases involving
New Chrysler that the usual rules applicable to such motions do not
apply. Instead, the Court's role is to serve as a gatekeeper, and
determine whether the claim asserted against New Chrysler is barred
by the Sale Documents. If the claim passes through the gate, the
court presiding over the action must determine whether the claim is
legally sufficient. New Chrysler's motion in this case and similar
cases is, in truth, a motion to enforce the Sale Documents, and
enjoin the prosecution of the cause of action rather than a motion
to dismiss based on legal insufficiency.

Under the Sale Documents, New Chrysler assumed liability under
certain circumstances and to a certain degree for post-closing
accidents involving motor vehicles manufactured pre-closing by Old
Chrysler. In the past, the issues referred to this Court generally
required the Court to determine whether, in the given
circumstances, the Sale Documents, barred the claim asserted in the
particular complaint entirely or limited New Chrysler's liability.

The Plaintiff alleges injuries resulting from a pre-petition
accident, and the clear terms of the Sale Documents, prohibit her
from suing New Chrysler for her injuries. Instead, the question in
the first instance is whether she was denied due process, and
hence, is not bound by the Sale Documents, because the Debtors did
not provide her with actual notice of the sale.

At oral argument, the Court asked for further briefing on the due
process issue. In its supplemental memorandum, New Chrysler argued
that the Plaintiff had not been prejudiced by the failure to
receive actual notice even if she was entitled to it. Other
creditors had objected to New Chrysler's failure or refusal to
assume liability for pre-closing accidents, and those objections
were overruled.

New Chrysler may ultimately be correct that the Plaintiff cannot
show prejudice, but that begs the unsettled question of whether she
must show prejudice. In addition, because the Court requested
simultaneous supplemental briefing on the due process issue, the
Plaintiff has not had an opportunity to respond to New Chrysler's
prejudice argument. Accordingly, the Court will deny New Chrysler's
motion to enforce the Sale Documents,based on the factual issues
identified, and resolve the initial question of whether the
Plaintiff was a known creditor. In the event the Court concludes
that she was entitled to actual notice, the Court will then
consider the question of prejudice upon further briefing.

The attorney for New Chrysler should schedule a hearing, at which
the Plaintiff may appear telephonically, to discuss further
proceedings.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision and Order dated
August 10, 2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2BSasWE from
Leagle.com.

Shelley Goodall, Plaintiff, pro se.

Chrysler Inc, Defendant, represented by Brian W. Bell --
bbell@smbtrials.com -- Swanson, Martin & Bell LLP, Marie Kathleen
Lynch -- mlynch@smbtrials.com -- Swanson, Martin & Bell LLP &
Michael Alexander McCaskey --  mmcaskey@smbtrials.com -- Swanson,
Martin & Bell.

FCA US LLC, Defendant, represented by Brian D. Glueckstein --
gluecksteinb@sullcrom.com -- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP.

                       About Chrysler LLC

Chrysler LLC and 24 affiliates on April 30, 2009, sought Chapter 11
protection from creditors (Bankr. S.D.N.Y (Mega-case), Lead Case
No. 09-50002).  Chrysler hired Jones Day, as lead counsel; Togut
Segal & Segal LLP, as conflicts counsel; Capstone Advisory Group
LLC, and Greenhill & Co. LLC, for financial advisory services; and
Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC, as its claims agent.  Chrysler
changed its corporate name to Old CarCo following its sale to a
Fiat-owned company.  As of Dec. 31, 2008, Chrysler had
$39,336,000,000 in assets and $55,233,000,000 in debts.  Chrysler
had $1.9 billion in cash at that time.

In connection with the bankruptcy filing, Chrysler reached an
agreement with Fiat SpA, the U.S. and Canadian governments and
other key constituents regarding a transaction under Section 363 of
the Bankruptcy Code that would effect an alliance between Chrysler
and Italian automobile manufacturer Fiat.  As part of that deal,
Fiat acquired a 20% equity interest in Chrysler Group.

Under the terms approved by the Bankruptcy Court, the company
formerly known as Chrysler LLC on June 10, 2009, formally sold
substantially all of its assets, without certain debts and
liabilities, to a new company that will operate as Chrysler Group
LLC.  The U.S. and Canadian governments provided Chrysler with $4.5
billion to finance its bankruptcy case.  Those loans are to be
repaid with the proceeds of the bankruptcy estate's liquidation.
Old Carco's Second Amendment Joint Plan of Liquidation was
confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court on April 23, 2010.


COVANTA HOLDING: S&P Rates New $334.6MM Unsec Tax-Exempt Notes 'B'
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issue-level rating and '6'
recovery rating to Covanta Holding Corp.'s proposed $334.6 million
senior unsecured tax-exempt bonds. The '6' recovery rating
indicates our expectation for negligible (0%-10%; rounded estimate:
5%) recovery in the event of a default.

The company intends to use the net proceeds from this issuance to
refinance its existing Series 2012 tax-exempt bonds issued by the
Niagara Area Development Corporation and Massachusetts Development
Finance Agency. Unlike the 2012 Series Notes that are being
refinanced, which S&P rates 'BB-', the new tax-exempt bonds will
not have a guarantee from Covanta Energy LLC. As of June 30, 2017,
Covanta had about $2.4 billion of total recourse, project-level,
and imputed debt. Covanta Holding Corp., the parent of Covanta
Energy LLC, is a publicly traded corporation that owns and operates
numerous energy-from-waste plants across the U.S. and Ireland.

The 'BB-' issuer credit rating on Covanta is based on S&P's
satisfactory assessment of the company's business risk profile and
our highly leveraged assessment of its financial risk profile.

  RATINGS LIST

  Covanta Holding Corp.
   Issuer Credit Rating        BB-/Stable/--

  New Rating

  Covanta Holding Corp.
   Senior Unsecured
    $334.6M Tax-Exempt Notes   B
     Recovery Rating           6(5%)


DLS CHICKEN: Unsecureds to be Paid 100% Plus 2.07% Interest
-----------------------------------------------------------
DLS Chicken Corp., d/b/a Chirping Chicken, submits a small business
disclosure statement for its proposed chapter 11 plan of
reorganization dated August 21, 2018.

General unsecured creditors under the plan are classified in Class
3 and will receive a distribution of 100% of their allowed claims
plus interest at the rate of 2.07% to be distributed as follows:
monthly payments over a period of 60 months.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by
available cash and future revenue and operations of the Debtor. The
Debtor will be the disbursing agent under the Plan. The Debtor will
continue to be managed by Dimitrios Papas post-confirmation.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb1-18-41455-46.pdf

                   About DLS Chicken Corp.

DLS Chicken Corp. operates a restaurant located at 355 Amsterdam
Avenue, New York, NY under the name "Chirping Chicken."

DLS Chicken Corp filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. N.Y. Case
No. 18-41455) on March 15, 2018, listing under $1 million in both
assets and liabilities. The Debtor is represented by Lawrence
Morrison at Morrison Tenenbaum PLLC.  Denis L. Abramowitz CPA PLLC
serves as the Debtor's accountant.


EAT FIT: Proposes Bell Auction of Georgia Kitchen's Kitchen Eqpt.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Eat Fit Go Healthy Foods, LLC, and affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska to authorize the sale
of Debtor Eat Fit Go Georgia Kitchen, LLC's commercial kitchen
equipment to

The Debtors previously operated in the State of Georgia, but have
since shuttered those operations.  By motion filed Aug. 2, 2018,
they sought and ultimately obtained permission to reject certain
unexpired leases and executory contracts tied to the Georgia
operations.

Pursuant to the Debtors prior operations in Georgia, the Georgia
Kitchen prepared and distributed meals to the area franchisees
through a leased commercial kitchen location.  As a result, the
Georgia Kitchen is the owner a wide array of unutilized commercial
kitchen equipment.  This equipment is now unnecessary.

The Georgia Kitchen is an entity organized under the laws of
Nebraska.  On Aug. 9, 2018, the Debtors caused a UCC search of the
Nebraska Secretary of State's central filing office in the name of
Eat Fit Go Georgia Kitchen, LLC.  The search results produced no
UCC-1 financing statements on file in Nebraska for the Georgia
Kitchen.  On information and belief, the Assets are free of any
recorded security interest.

The Debtors have concluded that the best mechanism for maximizing
the value to the Georgia Kitchen estate is through the sale of the
unused equipment by way of public auction.  They believe that the
Sale of the Assets pursuant to the terms set forth will maximize
the recovery for their estate.

To assist them with the Sale of the Assets, the Debtors have
engaged Bell Auctioneers of Conyers, Georgia, an experienced
auctioneer of food service equipment.  Under the terms of the
Auction Agreement, the Debtors will pay Bell Auctioneers a
commission of 20% of the gross auction sale from the proceeds of
the Sale.  In addition, the successful purchasers will pay Bell
Auctioneers an additional 10% to 13% of the applicable purchase
price on the sale of such items.  Bell Auctioneers has agreed to
cover the costs of marketing and advertising the auction.  It
intends to hold a public auction on Sept. 11, 2018.  In addition to
the physical auction, Bell Auctioneers will also offer the Assets
for sale through an online auction through Proxibid.

The Debtors believe that the Sale will generate sufficient proceeds
to cover all related administrative burdens of the estate and
provide significant additional proceeds for the benefit of
creditors.

As with the auction, the Debtors cannot reasonably determine, at
this time, the amount of taxable income they may realize from the
Sale.  However, it is possible that they will incur taxable income
as a result of the Sale.

The Debtors accordingly asks authority to convey the Assets to the
Successful Bidder free and clear of all liens, claims, interests,
and encumbrances.  They submit that they are unware of any liens or
encumbrances on the Assets.  Moreover, an Aug. 9, 2018, UCC search
of the Nebraska Secretary of State's central filing office reveals
that there are no UCC-1 financing statements on file in Nebraska.

In order to permit the Sale to proceed as expeditiously as possible
and to avoid further degradation or loss of value to the Assets,
good cause exists to waive the 14 day stay provided in Rule
6004(h).

A copy of the Auction Agreement and the list of equipment to be
sold attached to the Motion is available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Eat_Fit_39_Sales.pdf

The Auctioneer:

          BELL AUCTIONEERS (BELL)
          203 Camden Industrial Parkway
          Conyers, GA 30012

                  About Eat Fit Go Healthy Foods

Founded in 2015, Eat Fit Go Healthy Foods, LLC, offers a one-stop
shopping where a customer can purchase breakfast, lunch, dinner,
and snacks that are pre-cooked, pre-portioned, ready-to-eat meals.

Eat Fit Go Healthy Foods and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Neb. Case Nos.
18-81121 to 18-81130) on July 31, 2018.  In the petitions signed by
CEO Jenifer Cain, each debtor estimated $500,000 to $1 million in
assets and liabilities.  Judge Thomas L. Saladino presides over the
cases.


ECLIPSE RESOURCES: S&P Puts 'B-' ICR on CreditWatch Positive
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all of its ratings on Eclipse Resources
Corp., including the 'B-' issuer credit rating, on CreditWatch with
positive implications.

The CreditWatch placement follows Eclipse's announcement that it
will merge with exploration and production (E&P) company Blue Ridge
Mountain in an all-stock transaction. The combined company will be
one of the largest Utica-focused operators with estimated
production of 500 million cubic feet equivalent (MMcfe)-560 MMcfe
per day in the fourth quarter of 2018. The company will also have
about 227,000 net acres targeting both the Utica and Marcellus
shale formations. The two companies have adjacent assets in
Southern Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania and expect to
realize significant general and administrative expense and
operating cost savings while increasing their production by 20%
annually over the next couple of years. Given the absence of debt
at Blue Ridge Mountain, the companies expect leverage to be below
2x as of year-end 2018 pro forma for the acquisition, which S&P
views as moderate. S&P notes that Eclipse's senior unsecured notes
will remain outstanding after the merger and anticipate that the
combined entity will guarantee the debt.

S&P said, "The CreditWatch positive placement on Eclipse reflects
that we may raise our ratings on the company by one notch if the
transaction closes as we expect. The combined company will benefit
from the increased scale and we expect that its core leverage
ratios will remain moderate." However, several variables, such as
the combined company's estimated operating costs, capital
expenditures, ultimate capital structure, and liquidity, are
unknown at this time.

"We intend to resolve the CreditWatch placement soon after the
transaction closes, which we expect will occur by the end of the
fourth quarter of 2018."



EPW LLC: Seeks to Hire Hammerschmidt, Amaral & Jonas as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
EPW, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Indiana (South Bend Division) to hire
Hammerschmidt, Amaral & Jonas as counsel.

R. William Jonas, Jr., partner in Hammerschmidt, Amaral & Jonas,
attests that his firm has no connection with the creditors or any
other party in interest and has no interest adverse to the Debtor.

HAJ will charge $395 per hour for services rendered by R. William
Jonas, Jr.  Paralegals will be billed at the rate of $135 per
hour.

The counsel can be reached through:

     R. William Jonas, Jr., Esq.
     HAMMERSCHMIDT, AMARAL & JONAS
     137 N. Michigan Steet
     South Bend, IN 46601
     Tel: 574-282-1231
     Fax: 574-282-1234
     Email: lindaplata@hajlaw.com
            rwj@hajlaw.com

                         About EPW, LLC

EPW, LLC, is a privately held company engaged in the business of
manufacturing electric lighting equipment.

EPW, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ind. Case No.
18-31460) on Aug. 10, 2018.  In the petition signed by Douglas L.
Lammon, president, the Debtor disclosed $838,157 in total assets
and $1,302,073 in total liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge
Harry C. Dees, Jr.  Hammerschmidt, Amaral & Jonas, led by R.
William Jonas, Jr., serves as counsel to the Debtor.


ETERNAL JEWELERS: HK Assets Buying Assets for $14K
--------------------------------------------------
Eternal Jewelers, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois to authorize the sale of assets,
consisting of inventory, fixtures, equipment, and other tangible
and intangible personal property, to HK Assets, LLC for $13,900.

The Debtor's Chapter 11 Schedules (Schedule A) reflect its
ownership of certain assets consisting of the Assets.  Upon
information and belief, the Assets may be subject to a consensual
lien held by Direct Capital Corp.  

The Debtor has received an offer to purchase the Assets for $13,900
from the Buyer.  The offer to purchase is not subject to any
contingencies other than obtaining approval of the sale from the
Court.  The Debtor asks authority to sell the Assets to the Buyer
for $13,900 free and clear of liens, claims and encumbrances, with
all liens, claims and encumbrances to attach to proceeds of sale.

The Debtor has sound business justifications for selling the Assets
to the Buyer in that the Debtor has ceased business operations due
to its surrender of its leasehold premises to the landlord shortly
after the filing of the instant case.  It has determined that the
purchase price contained in the Offer should be accepted as the
proposed sale is representative of the fair market value of the
Assets.

Finally, it asks the Court to waive the 14-day stay of enforcement
under the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Rule 6004(h) and
allowing enforcement of the Order immediately upon its entry.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Sept. 4, 2018 at 9:30 a.m.

A copy of the Offer attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Eternal_Jewelers_41_Sales.pdf

                    About Eternal Jewelers Inc.

Eternal Jewelers, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 18-13761) on May 10,
2018.  In the petition signed by Fayed Yasin, president, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than
$500,000.  Judge Janet S. Baer presides over the case.


EVIO INC: Reports $3.45 Million Net Loss for Third Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------
EVIO, Inc., has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss of $3.45
million on $634,338 of total revenue for the three months ended
June 30, 2018, compared to a net loss of $570,454 on $777,218 of
total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2017.

For the nine months ended June 30, 2018, the Company reported a net
loss of $6.13 million on $2.31 million of total revenue compared to
a net loss of $1.85 million on $2.27 million of total revenue for
the same period during the prior year.

As of June 30, 2018, EVIO had $13.76 million in total assets, $7.21
million in total liabilities and $6.55 million in total equity.

The Company had cash on hand of $1,254,443 as of June 30, 2018,
current assets of $1,785,452 and current liabilities of $4,853,332
creating a working capital deficit of $3,067,880.  Current assets
consisted of cash totaling $1,254,443, accounts receivable net of
allowances totaling $300,215, prepaid expenses totaling $8,569,
other current assets of $122,225 and current portions of notes
receivable of $100,000.  Current liabilities consisted of accounts
payable and accrued liabilities of $825,445, client deposits of
$117,268, deferred revenue of $30,573, convertible notes payable
net of discounts of $500,000, derivative liabilities of $1,579,258,
current capital lease obligations of $153,555, interest payable of
$379,332, current portions of notes payable net of discounts of
$1,011,986 and current portions of related party payables of
$225,915.

EVIO said, "The Company is uncertain of its ability to generate
sufficient liquidity from its operations and its current revenues
are inadequate to fund all operational costs.  Additionally, in
order to fund growth organically or through acquisitions, we will
require additional capital.  As a result, we may need to raise
additional capital through future equity or debt financing.  We
anticipate our cash needs to be approximately $4,000,000 through
December 31, 2018.  If the Company is unable to raise additional
capital through future debt of equity financing, then Company will
need to slow its growth initiatives, dispose of assets or reduce
its cash consuming operating costs."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/svMKTH

                       About EVIO, Inc.

EVIO, Inc. (formerly Signal Bay, Inc.) -- www.eviolabs.com --
provides analytical testing and advisory services to the emerging
legalized cannabis industry.  The Company is domiciled in the State
of Colorado, and its corporate headquarters is located in Bend,
Oregon.

EVIO's independent accounting firm Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC,
in Salt Lake City, Utah, issued a "going concern" opinion in its
report on the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2017, noting that the Company has negative working
capital, recurring losses, and does not have a source of revenues
sufficient to cover its operations costs.  These factors raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.

EVIO reported a net loss of $3.59 million for the year ended Sept.
30, 2017, following a net loss of $2.55 million for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2016.


FARNAN INC: Has Until Sept. 28 To Exclusively File Chapter 11 Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Carlota M. Bohm of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Pennsylvania has extended, at the behest of
Farnan, Inc., the Debtor's exclusivity period to file a Chapter 11
Plan and Disclosure Statement until Sept. 28, 2018.

The deadline for the Debtor to file a plan and disclosure statement
in this case is also extended to Sept. 28, 2018.

In the Debtor's exclusivity extension motion, the Debtor explained
that the claims bar deadline fell on the same date as the previous
due date for the Chapter 11 Plan and Disclosure Statement, July 31,
2018.  As the claims bar deadline at that time had not yet passed
and the Debtor has been finalizing reports for April, May, and June
2018, the Debtor's counsel needs some additional time to prepare
and file the Chapter 11 Plan and Disclosure Statement.

A copy of the court order is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/pawb18-20378-86.pdf

                      About Farnan Inc.

Farnan Inc., operator of a bar and restaurant known as the Village
Inn, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No.
18-20378) on Feb. 1, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge
Carlota M. Bohm presides over the case.  Christopher M. Frye, Esq.,
at Steidl & Steinberg, serves as the Debtor's counsel.  No official
committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the Chapter
11 case.


FE26 LLC: Seeks to Hire PAI CPA, PLLC as Accountant & Advisor
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fe26 L.L.C. seek authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of North Carolina to hire Nesha Pai, and PAI CPA,
PLLC as accountant and financial advisor.

The professional services that PAI may render to the Debtor are:

     (a) provide accounting service and advice with respect to the
Debtor's compliance with its duties as debtor in possession in the
continued operation of its business and management of its
property;

     (b) assist the Debtor in preparing, reviewing and analyzing
financial and business information, disclosures and financial
reports necessary to present a plan of reorganization for
confirmation by the court;

     (c) approve a disclosure statement, and all related
reorganization agreements and/or documents;

     (d) prepare on behalf of the Debtor necessary financial
reports required of the Debtor in this case; and

     (f) perform such other financial, tax, and accounting services
that may be necessary and appropriate in this case.

Nesha Pai will charge monthly fixed fee of $600 plus reimbursements
of actual, necessary expenses and other charges incurred.  PAI will
separately charge Fe26 the amount of $900 for the preparation of
its annual tax return.

Nesha Pai, CPA, managing member of PAI CPA PLLC, attests that PAI
does not hold or represent any interest adverse to the Debtor's
estate, and PAI is a "disinterested person" as that phrase is
defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Nesha Pai, CPA
     Pai CPA, PLLC
     3440 Toringdon Way Suite 205
     Charlotte NC 28277
     Phone: 704-457-0006

                         About Fe26 L.L.C.

Fe26 L.L.C. is engaged in the business of metal fabrication.  It
operates from a leased location in Gastonia, North Carolina.

Fe26 L.L.C. filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D.N.C. Case No. 18-30889) on June
8, 2018, listing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.
Dennis M. O'Dea, Esq., at SFS LAW GROUP, is the Debtor's counsel.


FLYING COW RANCH: Has Until Dec. 3 to Exclusively File Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Mindy A. Mora of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida has extended until Dec. 3, 2018, the
exclusive period during which only Flying Cow Ranch HC, LLC, can
file a plan of reorganization.

                    About Flying Cow Ranch

Flying Cow Ranch HC, LLC, is a privately-held company in Jupiter,
Florida.  It is a small business debtor as defined in 11 U.S.C.
Section 101(51D).

Flying Cow Ranch HC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-12681) on March 8,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
$10 million to $50 million and liabilities of less than $500,000.
Judge Paul G. Hyman, Jr., presides over the case.  Rappaport
Osborne & Rappaport, PLLC is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


FORASTERO INC: Hires Tinelli Fernandez as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Forastero, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida to employ the law firm of Tinelli
Fernandez to represent the debtor in the collection of a property
damage insurance claim relating to damage suffered in Hurricane
Irma.

Tinelli Fernandez is under a contingency fee agreement whereby they
will charge ten percent (10%) of all gross insurance benefits paid.


Anthony Tinelli, Esq., member of Tinelli Fernandez, attests that
neither he nor the firm represents any interest adverse to the
Debtor, or the estate, and they are disinterested persons as
required by 11 U.S.C. Sec. 327(a).

The counsel can be reached through:

     Anthony Tinelli, Esq.
     Tinelli Fernandez
     2222 Ponce De Leon Blvd., Suite 300
     Coral Gable, FL 33134
     Phone: (305) 735-3800
     Fax: 305-370-6750
     Email: tinelli@tinellilaw.com

                      About Forastero, Inc.

Forastero, Inc., listed its business as a single asset real estate
as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B).

Based in Coral Gables, Florida, Forastero filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-13397) on March 23, 2018.
In the petition signed by Marie C. Vallejo, authorized
representative, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Robert A Mark.

Richard R. Robles, Esq., and Nicholas G. Rosoletti, Esq., at the
law firm Richard R Robles, PA, serve as the Debtor's counsel.
Reiner & Reiner, P.A., is the special counsel.


FORTERRA INC: S&P Affirms B- Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B-' issuer credit rating on
Forterra Inc. The rating outlook is stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we affirmed our 'B-' issue-level
rating on Forterra's $1.25 billion first-lien term loan due 2023
(the same as the issuer credit rating) and revised the recovery
rating on the term loan to '4' from '3', indicating our expectation
of average (30% to 50%; rounded estimate: 40%) recovery for lenders
in the event of a payment default. We do not rate the company's
$300 million asset-based lending (ABL) facility."

The affirmation of the 'B-' rating reflects Forterra's adequate
liquidity maintenance despite the effect of continued cost
inflation across its two segments. Through the first half of 2018,
Forterra's water segment experienced higher average scrap costs and
lower volume year over year--the latter due to downtime at its
Bessemer plant--both of which have yet to be offset by recently
implemented higher average selling prices. This has resulted in
lower year-over-year margins within the water segment. The company
has reorganized management in the segment, raised selling prices,
and increased its bookings and backlog, but S&P believes it will
take approximately three months for these items to fully reflect in
the company's earnings.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our assumption that
Forterra's liquidity will remain adequate over the next 12 months
and the company will generate positive free cash flow in 2018 and
2019. The stable outlook also reflects our view that the company
will remain highly leveraged. Our base case scenario assumes the
company will not undertake any further large-scale acquisitions or
dividends during the next 12 months.

"We could lower our rating if Forterra's operating cash flows
turned negative and the company found itself unable to address
capital spending and seasonal working capital needs without
significant reliance on its ABL. We could also lower the rating if
the company's adjusted EBITDA to interest coverage declined toward
1x, which we believe would indicate constrained liquidity. While we
view this as unlikely during the next 12 months given the ratio is
currently above 2x, we believe this could result if margins were to
decline further as a result of weather delays, lack of municipal
infrastructure spending, prolonged raw material, freight, and/or
labor cost inflation, or sustained competition in key markets. An
unlikely level of revenue declines in excess of 50% or margin
deterioration in excess of 600 basis points (bps) over the next 12
months would be required to affect interest coverage in such a way.
While these events could be the result of another economic
recession, our economists view the chance of this occurring over
the next 12 months as 10%-15%.

"We could raise the rating on Forterra if the company significantly
reduced leverage toward 5x over the next 12 months. While also
unlikely, this could happen following EBITDA margin improving by
600 bps coupled with significant revenue growth of more than 60%
over the next 12 months."



FRANK MOULTRIE: Court Grants FMC, T. Witt Bid for Summary Judgment
------------------------------------------------------------------
The adversary proceeding captioned FRANK A. MOULTRIE, Plaintiff, v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, CHARLES O. WALL, II; LONG-LEWIS OF THE RIVER
REGION, INC.; TODD C. OUELLETTE, and TIMOTHY L. WITT, Defendants,
Adversary Proceeding Case No. 16-00078-TOM (Bankr. N.D. Ala.) came
before the Court on June 13, 2018, for a hearing on the Motion for
Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company and Timothy
L. Witt, the Response filed by Plaintiff Frank A. Moultrie, and the
Reply filed by Ford and Witt. After considering the pleadings,
arguments of counsel, the exhibits, and the law, Bankruptcy Judge
Tamara O. Mitchel granted the Defendants motion for summary
judgment.

Autauga Automotive, LLC, was formed in early July 2009 to acquire
the assets of Gilmore Ford in Prattville, Alabama. Charles Wall was
an original organizer and member of Autauga, as was Jesse Mariner.
After Ford Motor Company rejected Mariner as a potential franchise
owner for character reasons, Frank Moultrie replaced him as
co-owner of Autauga. In October 2009, Autauga entered a Sales and
Service Agreement with Ford that established Autauga as an
authorized dealer of Ford vehicles. That contract listed Moultrie
and Wall as co-managers of the dealership, possessing 51% and 49%
equity ownership, respectively. Any proposed change to the
ownership or management of Autauga had to be approved by Ford, but
Ford could not unreasonably withhold its consent. Soon thereafter,
Autauga was issued a new-motor-vehicle-dealer license by the
Alabama Department of Revenue.

Moultrie filed an adversary complaint against, among others, Ford
Motor Company and Timothy L. Witt, Ford's regional manager.
Moultrie's Complaint, as amended, asserts multiple Alabama
statutory and common-law claims against Ford and Witt based on the
sale of Autauga's assets and the amendment of the Sales and Service
Agreement to reflect Moultrie was no longer an owner.

Ford and Witt have moved for summary judgment as to all counts of
the Amended Complaint.  Ford and Witt contend that they have no
liability to Moultrie because he did not obtain a stay of the March
11, 2014 circuit court order determining that "Wall is the 100%
owner in capital and in profits and losses of Autauga Automotive,
LLC." In Alabama, "a judgment rendered by a court having
jurisdiction protects the parties acting under it before a reversal
or stay and constitutes a sufficient justification for all acts
done in its enforcement before it is set aside on appeal." Thus,
any action taken by Ford and Witt in reliance on the circuit court
judgment prior to reversal was valid, unless the judgment was
stayed.

Rule 62 of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 8 of the
Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure address stay of a judgment
during an appeal. A judgment that does not involve injunctive
relief is subject to execution 30 days after entry absent the
posting of a supersedeas bond or a court-ordered stay. If the
judgment contains an injunction, it is immediately enforceable
absent court order. Moultrie did not post a supersedeas bond, and
although he sought a stay of the judgment in the circuit court and
then the Alabama Supreme Court, his motions were denied. Because
there was no stay, Ford and Witt were entitled to rely on the
judgment and there is no basis upon which Moultrie may be awarded
damages for their actions.

The Court finds that Ford and Witt have met their burden of proving
that there is no genuine issue as to the material facts, and that
the Motion for Summary Judgment is due to be granted as to all
counts of the Amended Complaint.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated August 10,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2BQUwDZ from Leagle.com.

Frank Moultrie, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew P. Campbell
--andy.campbell@campbellguin.com --  Campbell Guin Williams Guy &
Gidiere LLC, Patrick Gray , The Gray Law Group, Cason M. Kirby --
cason.kirby@campbellguin.com -- Campbell Guin, LLC & Justin G.
Williams  -- Justin.williams@campbellguin.com -- Campbell Guin
Williams Guy & Gidiere LLC.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY & Timothy L. Witt, Defendants, represented by H.
Lanier Brown -- lbrown@watkinseager.com -- Watkins & Eager PLLC.

Charles O. Wall, II, Defendant, represented by William Allen
Sheehan -- Allen.Sheehan@chlaw.com -- Capell & Howard, PC &
Christopher William Weller -- Chris.Weller@chlaw.com  -- Capell &
Howard, P.C.

Long Lewis of the River Region, Inc. & Todd C. Ouellette,
Defendants, represented by Douglas Barkley Hargett, Hall, Tanner &
Hargett, P.C.

                      About Frank Moultrie

Frank Moultrie filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
N.D. Ala. Case No. 16-00574).  

The case is assigned to Judge Tamara O. Mitchell.  The Debtor is
represented by Edward J. Peterson III, Esq., at Stichter, Riedel,
Blain & Postler, P.A.


GATEWAY HOLDING: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Gateway Holding, LLC
        2100 1st Avenue South
        Saint Petersburg, FL 33712

Business Description: Gateway Holding, LLC filed as a Single Asset
                      Real Estate Debtor (as defined in 11 U.S.C.
                      Section 101(51B)).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 29, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida (Tampa)

Case No.: 18-07289

Debtor's Counsel: Niurka Fernandez Asmer, Esq.
                  FL LEGAL GROUP
                  501 E. Kennedy, Suite 810
                  Tampa, FL 33602
                  Tel: 813-221-9500
                  Fax: 813-341-6898
                  Email: NFA@888FLLEGAL.COM
                         NFA@FLLegalGroup.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Gagandeep S. Mangat M.D., manager.

The Debtor stated it has no unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb18-07289.pdf


GENESIS ENERGY: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B+', Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term issuer credit rating on
Houston-based Genesis Energy L.P. to 'B+' from 'BB-'. The outlook
is stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we lowered our issue-level rating on
all of the company's senior unsecured notes to 'B+' from 'BB-'. The
'4' recovery rating on the debt is unchanged, indicating our
expectation for average (30%-50%; rounded estimate: 40%) recovery
in the event of default.

"The rating action is prompted by a 13% reduction in our EBITDA
expectations that lead to slower-than-expected deleveraging. The
stable outlook reflects our view that Genesis' soda ash business
will continue to perform favorably under the current market
conditions and that the headwinds experienced in the midstream
businesses are likely behind it. While our adjusted leverage, with
the inclusion of the hybrid securities, is about 6x for 2018, we
expect Genesis to remain focused on its deleveraging initiatives
through a combination of EBITDA growth and debt reduction
throughout 2019.

"We could lower the rating if our adjusted debt to EBITDA exceeds
6x on a consistent basis in our forecast beyond 2018. This may stem
from lower-than-expected volumes flowing through Genesis' midstream
assets or depressed soda ash prices. We could also consider
lowering the rating if Genesis pursues growth opportunities through
new leveraging transactions.   

"We could raise the rating if Genesis achieves our adjusted debt to
EBITDA of below 5x on a consistent basis. This may stem from a
combined effect of additional pay-down of the revolving credit
facility and improved cash flows through leveraging the existing
linked asset base to capture new business opportunities or
expanding into new geographic regions, supported by long-term
contracts."



GIGA-TRONICS: Sold 6,500 Additional Shares of Series E Pref. Stock
------------------------------------------------------------------
Giga-tronics Incorporated issued and sold 6,500 additional shares
of its 6.0% Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred
Stock to five investors in a private placement pursuant to a
Securities Purchase Agreement.  The purchase price for each Series
E Share was $25.00, resulting in total gross proceeds of $162,500.


Emerging Growth Equities, Ltd. served as the Company's exclusive
placement agent in connection with the private placement.  Fees
payable to Emerging Growth Equities, Ltd. at completion of the
transaction were 5% of gross proceeds, plus warrants to purchase 5%
of the number of common shares into which the Series E shares can
be converted (100 common shares) at an exercise price of $0.25 per
share.  Proceeds to the Company after fees and expenses will be
approximately $158,400.  The Company expects to use the proceeds
for working capital and general corporate purposes.

New investors purchasing Series E shares also signed the Investor
Rights Agreement to which the other Series E shareholders are
parties.  There are now a total of 68,340 Series E Shares
outstanding.

The Company issued the securities in reliance on the exemption from
registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.  

                       About Giga-tronics

Headquartered in Dublin, California, Giga-tronics Incorporated is a
publicly held company, traded on the OTCQB Capital Market under the
symbol "GIGA".  Giga-tronics produces instruments, subsystems and
sophisticated microwave components that have broad applications in
defense electronics, aeronautics and wireless telecommunications.

Giga-Tronics reported a net loss of $3.10 million for the year
ended March 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $1.54 million for
the year ended March 25, 2017.  As of June 30, 2018, the Company
had $6.37 million in total assets, $5.07 million in total
liabilities and $1.29 million in total shareholders' equity.


HOPEWELL RISK: Unsecureds Creditors to Receive 70% of Allowed Claim
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopewell Risk Strategies, LLC, submits a disclosure statement
describing its plan of reorganization dated August 21, 2018.

Class 7 under the plan consists of the Allowed Unsecured Claims of
$7,500 or less, and those Allowed Unsecured Claims in excess of
$7,500 which are voluntarily reduced by the holders thereof to
$7,500 with the amount in excess of $7,500 being waived, as the
same are allowed, approved and ordered paid by the Bankruptcy
Court. There are two known creditors in this class.

Each creditor holding an Allowed Class 7 Claim will receive 70% of
the amount of its claim, in cash, on the Effective Date or when
such claim is allowed or ordered paid by Final Order of the Court,
whichever date is later. Class 7 claims are impaired.

The Debtor is in the process of arranging to fund the Plan of
Reorganization out of the Debtor's projected significant
improvement in overall income over the next few months and years --
due to the following factors:

   * The company has been able to partner (i.e. cooperate) with a
similarly small information technology company and upgrade its
legacy systems with new EDI interfaces, build new cloud and web
products and introduce a healthcare transparency application in the
Google Play Store. In addition, the company has rebranded its
products and services, become a member of the association with its
largest set of potential clients. The Self Insurance Institute of
America (SIIA), and is schedule to attend for the first time in
over 5 years, SIIA's annual conference September 2018 in Austin,
Texas. Mr. Young and two Directors of the company have been calling
on old and potentially new clients who plan on attending SIIA's
Fall Conference with the goal of adding 1-3 new clients to the
rolls of the company. A new client usually adds $50,000 to $150,000
annually in top-line revenue.

   * With new products and services, technically upgraded
offerings, new EDI (electronic data interchange) interfaces, the
company has steadied the ship and can now offer a much better
experience for its customers. There is a need for more sales help,
but for now, the immediate goal is to take these new products and
services to the marketplace and add the 1 to 3 new clients.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb18-30875-55.pdf

              About Hopewell Risk Strategies

Founded by an experienced healthcare executive and attorney,
Hopewell Risk Strategies, LLC, is a healthcare management firm
focused on delivering exceptional niche solutions and products
across the healthcare delivery system.

Hopewell Risk Strategies sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 18-30875) on March 1,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities of less than $1 million.  Judge Karen K. Brown presides
over the case.

The Debtor hired Hoffman & Saweris, p.c., as its bankruptcy
counsel; Patel Ervin PLLC as special counsel; and Lucas, Tucker,
P.C., CPAs as accountant.


HORIZONTAL RENTALS: Hires David T. Cain as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------
Horizontal Rentals, Inc. seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) to hire David
T. Cain, Esq. and the Law Office of David T. Cain as the Debtor's
counsel.

The Debtor requires David T. Cain to:

     a. advise the Debtor as to its rights, duties and powers as
debtor-in-possession;

     b. prepare and file any statements, schedules, plans and other
documents or pleadings to be filed by the Debtor in this case;

     c. represent the Debtor at all hearings, meetings of
creditors, conferences, trials and other proceedings in this case;
and

     d. perform such other legal services as may be necessary.

The firm will charge $300 per hour for Mr. David T. Cain's
services, $150 per hour for travel time spent by the attorney, and
$75 per hour for paralegal time.

David T. Cain, Esq. of the Law Office of David T. Cain, attests
that he does not hold or represent an interest adverse to the
estate with respect to the matters in which the attorney is
employed.

The counsel can be reached through:

     David T. Cain, Esq.
     LAW OFFICE OF DAVID T. CAIN
     8626 Tesoro Dr, Suite 811
     San Antonio, TX 78217
     Tel: (210) 308-0388
     Fax: (210) 503-5033
     Email: caindt@swbell.net       

                   About Horizontal Rentals

Horizontal Rentals, Inc., offers oil field equipment for rent for
the oil and gas industry.  The Company offers eliminator separation
system, standard skim system, strategic Hydrodynamic separator, gas
management program, mud mixing units, light towers, fire box
systems and hydro washers.  Visit http://horizontalrentalsinc.com
for more information.

Horizontal Rentals filed a voluntary petition fir relief under
Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No.
18-51972) on Aug. 20, 2018.  In the petition signed by Brian
Warncke, vice president, the Debtor estimated $50,000 in assets and
$1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  Judge Craig A. Gargotta
presides over the case.  The Law Office of David T. Cain is the
Debtor's counsel.


INNOVATIVE WINDOW: Hires Brian K. McMahon as Attorney
-----------------------------------------------------
Innovative Window Concepts seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Florida to employ Brian K.
McMahon, P.A., as attorney to the Debtor.

The Debtor requires Brian K. McMahon to:

   a. give advice to the Debtor with respect to its powers and
duties as a debtor in possession;

   b. advise the Debtor with respect to its responsibilities in
complying with the U.S. Trustee's Operating Guidelines and
Reporting Requirements and with the rules of the court;

   c. prepare motions, pleadings, orders, applications, adversary
proceedings, and other legal documents necessary in the
administration of the case;

   d. protect the interest of the Debtor in all matters pending
before the court; and

   e. represent the Debtor in negotiation with its creditors in the
preparation of a plan.

Brian K. McMahon will be paid his current hourly rate of $400.00.
Brian K. McMahon will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Brian K. McMahon, partner of Brian K. McMahon, P.A., assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Brian K. McMahon can be reached at:

     Brian K. McMahon, Esq.
     BRIAN K. MCMAHON, P.A.
     1401 Forum Way, 6th Floor
     West Palm Beach, FL 33401
     Tel: (561) 478-2500

                      About Innovative Window Concepts

Innovative Window Concepts is a Florida-based company that
manufactures custom and standard aluminum windows and doors.

Innovative Window Concepts and Doors, Inc., filed a voluntary
petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Case no. 18-20251) on Aug. 23, 2018.  In its petition, the
Debtor estimated $500,001 to $1 million in assets and $1 million to
$10 million in liabilities.  The Hon. Erik P. Kimball presides over
the case.  Brian K. McMahon, Esq., at Brian K. McMahon, P.A.,
serves as bankruptcy counsel.


INTOWN COMPANIES: Panama Assets Buying Panama Property for $10K
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Intown Companies, Inc. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Georgia to authorize the sale of the real
property, and improvements thereon, located at 4810 West Highway
98, Panama City, Florida, Parcel Number 28274-000-000 in Bay
County, Florida, to Panama Assets, LLC for $10,000.

On March 28, 2018, the Buyer filed the Stay Motion.  The Debtor
filed an Objection to the Stay Motion on May 13, 2018, and hearings
on the Motion were held on May 13, June 27, and July 31, 2018.  On
Aug. 7, 2018, the Court entered the MFRS Order, pursuant to which,
inter alia, the Buyer was granted relief from the automatic stay
and the Buyer and the Debtor entered into an agreement whereby the
Buyer agreed to purchase the Property under section 363 of the
Bankruptcy Code and accept assignment of executory contracts under
section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Debtor wishes to sell the Property to the Buyer for the
aggregate purchase price of $10,000 pursuant to the terms of the
MFRS Order on Sept. 11, 2018.  The Buyer will not assume any
liabilities of the Debtor in connection with the Property with the
sole exception of accrued unpaid real property taxes on the
Property.  The Debtor also asks authorization to take such action
and to execute and deliver any warranty deeds, bills of sale, and
other documents, agreements and instruments that may be necessary
or advisable to effectuate the terms of the sale described.

The Debtor proposes to sell the Property to the Buyer free and
clear of any and all liens, claims, interests and encumbrances,
other than liens or claims for unpaid real property taxes for the
years 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2017 held by the Bay County Tax
Commissioner, under the terms and conditions set forth in the MFRS
Order.  

The sale of the Property as proposed herein is reasonable and
proper under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code and is in the best
interests of the Debtor, its creditors, and the estate.
Additionally, the Debtor has exercised its sound business judgment
in proposing the sale of the Property.  Accordingly, ample cause
exists for the proposed sale of the Property to the Buyer.

The Debtor further asks authority pursuant to assume and assign to
the Buyer the following executory contracts: (1) subscription
agreement between Debtor and Image Hotel Systems, LTD dated Aug. 7,
2017; (2) agreement for the purposes of providing merchant
services/credit card processing between Debtor and Merchant-Link,
LLC dated Aug. 17, 2017; and (3) lease agreement between Debtor and
CSC ServiceWorks, Inc. dated May 15, 2017.

On July 9, 2018, the Debtor filed three separate motions to assume
each of the Assigned Contracts.  As noted by the Court at the Stay
Hearing, no objections were filed by any Contract Counterparty on
the Debtor's Assumption Motions.  The Sale Motion asks approval of
assumption of the Assigned Contracts pursuant to the Assumption
Motions and assignment to Panama.  Subject to the Debtor's, Melton
Harrell's, and the Guarantors' compliance with all of their
obligations under the MFRS Order, the Buyer agrees to accept
assignment and be bound by the Assigned Contracts.

The Debtor will not assign, and Buyer will not accept the
assignment of, any management agreements or contracts other than
the Assigned Contracts, including but not limited to any management
agreements or contracts with American Motel Management Inc. or any
entity that is an insider of the Debtor.

Because of the parties wish to close the transactions contemplated
as promptly as possible, the Debtor asks that the Court orders and
directs that the order approving the Motion will not be
automatically stayed for 14 days.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Sept. 6, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.
Objections, if any, must be filed at least two business days before
the hearing.

                  About The Intown Companies

After filing for bankruptcy in 2014 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No.
14-50374), the Intown Companies, Inc., again sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on Feb. 23, 2018 (Bankr.
N.D. Ga. Case No. 18-53046).  Judge James R. Sacca presides over
the case.  Wiggam & Geer, LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.



JACOBS FINANCIAL: Delays 2018 Annual Report to Complete Review
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jacobs Financial Group, Inc., was unable without unreasonable
effort and expense to prepare its accounting records and schedules
in sufficient time to allow its accountants to complete their
review of the Company's financial statements for the period ended
May 31, 2018 before the required filing date for the subject Annual
Report on Form 10-K.  The Company intends to file the subject
Annual Report on Form 10-K on or before the fifteenth calendar day
following the prescribed due date.

                      About Jacobs Financial

Jacobs Financial Group, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: JFGI), is a
holding company for FS Investments, Inc., Jacobs & Company and
Crystal Mountain Spring Water, Inc. and one majority owned
subsidiary, First Surety Corporation.  The Company operates through
two segments: investment management services and surety insurance
products and services.  The Company is headquartered in Charleston,
West Virginia, and through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, employs a
total of nine full-time individuals.

Jacobs Financial reported a net loss attributable to the Company's
stockholders of $2.61 million for the year ended May 31, 2017,
compared to a net loss attributable to the Company's stockholders
of $1.27 million for the year ended May 31, 2016.  As of May 31,
2017, Jacobs Financial had $42.47 million in total assets, $44.93
million in total liabilities, $2.24 million in total mandatorily
redeemable convertible preferred stock and a total stockholders'
deficit of $4.71 million.

EKS&H LLLP's report on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended May 31, 2017, includes an explanatory paragraph
expressing substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continute as a going concern.  The auditors stated that the Company
has insufficient liquidity, financial resources, is in default with
certain loan and preferred stock agreements, and has suffered
significant recurring operating losses.  These conditions, among
others, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


JAMES TAGLIARENI: Case FCNJ Buying Annandale Property for $1.2M
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Christine M. Gravelle of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey will convene a hearing on Sept. 11, 2018 at
10:00 a.m. to consider James Tagliareni's private sale of the real
property located at 156 River Road, Annandale, New Jersey to Case
FCNJ, LLC for $1,187,945.

Objections, if any, must be filed at least seven before the
hearing.

The Debtor has an interest as co-owner with his wife, Pamela
Tagliareni (a non-debtor), in the Property.  The Property was
listed for sale with Weichert Realtors for $1.35 million and
remains listed for sale.

On June 27, 2012, the Debtor executed a note in favor of First
Choice Bank in connection with a commercial mortgage loan to the
Debtor in the amount of $1,074,538.  To secure payment on the note,
the Debtor and his wife executed a mortgage in favor of First
Choice Bank against the Property.  On Jan. 25, 2016, the note and
mortgage were assigned to Case Investors III, LLC.  The note was
further secured by a guaranty from Inspire Kids, LLC.

The Debtor defaulted on the note and on March 24, 2016, Case
Investors III, LLC filed a foreclosure complaint in the Superior
Court of New Jersey, Hunterdon County, Docket No. F-009528-16,
against the Debtor, the Debtor's wife and Inspire Kids.  A hearing
was scheduled for March 3, 2017, in the Case Investors Foreclosure
Action for an order setting the late charges due to be incorporated
in a judgment of foreclosure.

On April 5, 2016, Case Investors further filed a complaint for
recovery on the note in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Hunterdon
County, Civil Division, Docket No. L-000147-7.  The Debtor did not
file an answer to the Complaint and Case Investors filed a motion
for default judgment in the Case Investors Civil Division Action,
which was also scheduled to be heard on March 3, 2017.

On May 8, 2017, a Consent Order was entered setting the amount of
Case Investors' pre-petition Allowed Claim at $1,187,945.  There
are no other liens on the Property and the pre- and post-petition
taxes on the Property are current.

Pursuant to, and as contemplated by the Plan, the Debtor and Case
Investors are finalizing an easement agreement and purchase and
sale agreement for the Property.  Pursuant to the Agreements, Case
Investors, having filed an allowed pre-petition claim for
$1,187,945, will accept a transfer of ownership of the Property
from the Debtor and his non-debtor spouse in full, free and clear
of all liens, claims and encumbrances in final satisfaction of all
claims against the Debtor, his wife, and Inspire Kids.  Case
Investors will waive any and all claims under the guaranties and
give the Debtor certain easements on the Property for the Debtor's
full use and enjoyment of his residence at 154 River Road.

There is no real estate commission to be charged to the estate as a
result of the transfer of the Property to Case Investors.

The sale of the Property is being made pursuant to the plan of
reorganization and to the extent the Plan is confirmed prior to the
sale, the sale will not be subject to any realty transfer fees,
taxes and the like.

Given the amount of Case Investor's allowed claim, coupled with the
easement and releases, the Debtor respectfully submits that fair
value is being received by the Debtor in exchange for the transfer
of the Property.

The Debtor represents that the facts and circumstances set forth do
not present novel questions of law, and, as such, respectfully
requests that the Court waives the requirement of the filing of a
memorandum of law in accordance with D.N.J. LBR 9013-1(3).

A copy of the Agreements attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/James_Tagliareni_237_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Daniel N. Zinman, Esq.
          KRISS & FEUERSTEIN LLP
          360 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1200
          New York, NY 10017
          Facsimile: (646) 454-4168
          E-mail: dzinman@kandfllp.com

James Tagliareni sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Case
No. 17-14116) on March 2, 2017.  

The Debtor tapped Joseph R Zapata, Jr., Esq., at Mellinger, Sanders
& Kartzman, LLC, as counsel.  Weichert Realtors was also engaged by
the Debtor as realtor.

On May 25, 2018, the Debtor filed his Second Amended Plan of
Reorganization.


JEFE PLOVER: Hires Cavazos Hendricks Poirot as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
Jefe Plover Interests, Ltd., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas) to
employ Charles Brackett Hendricks, Esq. at Cavazos Hendricks
Poirot, P.C., as the Debtor's counsel.

Cavazos Hendricks is expected to:

     a. advise and consult with the Debtor regarding the filing of
the petition, schedules, statement of financial affairs, and a plan
of reorganization;

     b. advise and consult the Debtors concerning questions arising
in the conduct of the administration of their respective estates
and concerning applicants' rights and remedies with regard to
assets and the claims of their respective estates and other issues
pertaining thereto that may arise from unknown parties, creditors
and parties in interest;

     c. appear, prosecute, defend and represent the Debtor's
interest in suits arising in or related to the Debtor's case;

     d. assist in the preparation of pleadings, motions, notices
and orders as required for the orderly administration of the
Debtor's estate; and

     e. investigate any means necessary to preserve some property
rights owned by the estate and to determine and take all necessary
and reasonable actions for the preservation or liquidation of those
assets as necessary.

The hourly rates range from $230 to $500 for attorneys and from $50
to $135 for paraprofessionals.

The firm's attorneys are "disinterested persons" as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court
filings.

Cavazos can be reached through:

     Charles B. Hendricks, Esq.
     Emily S. Wall, Esq.
     Cavazos Hendricks Poirot, P.C.
     Suite 570, Founders Square
     900 Jackson Street
     Dallas, TX 75202
     Direct Dial: (214) 573-7302
     Fax: (214) 573-7399
     E-mail: chuckh@chfirm.com
             ewall@chfirm.com

                 About Jefe Plover Interests

Jefe Plover Interests, Ltd., based in Dallas, Texas, is engaged in
activities related to real estate.  Jefe Plover is affiliated with
Forest Park Medical Center at Southlake and Forest Park Medical
Center, LLC.

Jefe Plover Interests filed a Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex.
Case No. 18-32722) on Aug. 15, 2018.  The petition was signed by by
Jeffrey H. Mims, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of
Wade Neal Barker, Case No. 18-32014-sgj7.  The Hon. Stacey G.
Jernigan presides over the case.

Charles Brackett Hendricks, Esq., at Cavazos Hendricks Poirot,
P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.


JONAS WERNER: Hires McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney as Attorney
----------------------------------------------------------
Jonas Werner Construction LLC seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey (Newark) to hire
McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP as attorneys.

Professional services to be rendered by MDMC are:

     a. give advice to Applicant with respect to its powers and
duties as Debtor in the continued management of its Property;

     b. negotiate with creditors of the Debtor in working out an
arrangement and to take the necessary legal steps in order to
confirm said arrangement, including, if need be, to prepare, on
behalf of Applicant, necessary applications, answers, orders,
reports and other legal papers;

     c. appear before the Bankruptcy Judge and to protect the
interests of Applicant before said Bankruptcy Judge; and to perform
all other legal services for Applicant, as Debtor, which may be
necessary.

Current hourly rates for MDMC professionals are:

     Partner         $525 to $675
     Associates      $240 to $450
     Paralegals      $215 to $260

Louis A. Modugno of McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP
attests that his firm is a disinterested person under 11 U.S.C.
Sec. 101(14), and does not represent or hold any interest adverse
to the debtor or the estate with respect to the matter for which
he/she will be retained under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 327(e).

The counsel can be reached through:

     Louis A. Modugno, Esq.
     McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney
     & Carpenter LLP
     1300 Mt. Kemble Avenue
     PO Box 2075
     Morristown, NJ 07962
     Tel: 973-993-8100
     E-mail: lmodugno@mdmc-law.com

                About Jonas Werner Construction

Jonas Werner Construction LLC is in the Single-family Housing
Construction business.

Based in Lake Hiawatha, New Jersey, Jonas Werner Construction LLC
filed a Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-26998) on
Aug. 24, 2018, listing $500,001 to $1 million in assets and
$1,000,001 to $10 million in liabilities.

Louis A. Modugno at McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, is
the Debtor's counsel.


JONESBORO HOSPITALITY: Lender Selling Real/Personal Property
------------------------------------------------------------
Ciena Capital Funding, LLC, as Servicer for the Bank of New York
Mellon Trust Co., N.A., formerly known as The Bank of New York
Trust Company, N.A., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Texas to authorize the sale of real property and
personal property to Naziroddin J. Kazi, or any person or entity
designated by same, including but limited to, AS-Sami, LLC, for
$1,872,500.

The Auction has been concluded.  The Auction produced sufficient
proceeds to fund the Net Proceeds Carve Out, to pay the Allowed
Secured Claims of Craighead County in full, and to pay the Allowed
Secured Claims of Lender, in part.

The Debtor's Plan was negotiated with the Internal Revenue Service,
and the Arkansas state agency holding the most significant claim
against the Debtor -- the Arkansas Department of Finance.  However,
another Arkansas state agency -- the Arkansas Department of
Workforce Services -- also appears to have recorded liens
encumbering the Auctioned Property.  The Plan was served upon the
Attorney General for the State of Arkansas and was confirmed
without objection.

To ensure that the sale of the Auctioned Property closes and that
all parties' rights are preserved, the Debtor asks that the Court
authorizes the Auctioneer, or any title company acting pursuant to
the authority of the Confirmation Order or the order granting the
Motion, to close the sale of the Auctioned Property; to vest title
in the Buyer free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances
whatsoever, save and except current year property taxes which will
be pro-rated; and remit to the Lender all sale proceeds in excess
of those necessary to fully satisfy the Allowed Secured Claims of
Craighead County and closing costs (including the fees of the
Auctioneer).

The proposed purchase amount is $1,872,500.  The sale price will
fund the payment of all Allowed Secured Claims of Craighead County,
the Net Proceeds Carve Out, with the remainder of the sale proceeds
being distributed in partial satisfaction of the Lender's Allowed
Secured Claim.  All fees and costs of sale will be borne by the
Lender inasmuch as they reduce the distribution on the Lender's
Allowed Secured Claim.

The other known names and addresses of lienholders of record are:
(i) Internal Revenue Service, Centralized Insolvency Operations,
P.O. Box 7346, Philadelphia, PA 19101; (ii) Arkansas Department of
Finance and Admin., Legal Counsel Room 2380, P.O. Box 1272, Little
Rock, AR 72203; and (iii) Arkansas Dept. of Workforce Services, 2
Capitol Mall, Little Rock, AR 72201.

The Lender asks that the Court enters an order approving the sale
of the Auctioned Property free and clear of all liens, claims and
encumbrances as described, and directs the payment of certain
claims as provided in the Plan and granting Lender all other relief
as is just.

                    About Jonesboro Hospitality

Jonesboro Hospitality, LLC, doing business as FairBridge Inn &
Suites, owns and operates a hotel located at 3006 S. Caraway Road,
Jonesboro, Arkansas.

Jonesboro Hospitality previously filed a prior Chapter 11 case
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 13-34324) in Dallas in 2013.  It
confirmed a plan of reorganization in its prior case on May 30,
2014.

Jonesboro Hospitality sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 17-40311) on Feb. 15,
2017.  In the petition signed by Payal Nanda, principal, the Debtor
estimated its assets and liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

The case is assigned to Judge Brenda T. Rhoades.

The Debtor is represented by Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq., Sarah M. Cox,
Esq., Jamie N. Kirk, Esq., and Jeffery M. Veteto, Esq., at Joyce W.
Lindauer Attorney, PLLC.

No trustee, examiner or official committee has been appointed.

On Oct. 13, 2017, the Debtor filed a disclosure statement, which
explains its proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.  On Dec.
15, 2017, Ciena Capital Funding LLC, the Debtor's lender, filed a
combined plan of liquidation and disclosure statement.

On April 6, 2018, the Court confirmed the Debtor's Combined Plan of
Liquidation and Disclosure Statement.


KANTIS UNIVERSAL: Hires Kelley & Fulton PL as General Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Kantis Universal, LLC, seeks authority from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida (West Palm
Beach) to hire Craig I. Kelley and the law firm of Kelley & Fulton,
P.L., as the Debtor's general counsel.

Professional services the firm will render are:

     a. advise the Debtor generally regarding matters of bankruptcy
law in connection with its case;

     b. advise the Debtor of the requirements of the Bankruptcy
Code, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, applicable
bankruptcy rules, including local rules, pertaining to the
administration of the Case and U.S. Trustee Guidelines related to
the daily operation on its business and administration of the
estate:

     c. represent the Debtor in all proceedings before the Court;

     d. prepare and review motions, pleadings, orders,
applications, adversary proceedings, and other legal  documents
arising in this case;

     e. negotiate with creditors, prepare and seek confirmation of
a plan of reorganization and related documents, and assist the
Debtor with implementation of any plan; and

     f. perform all other legal services for the Debtor.

Craig I. Kelley, Esq., will perform the legal services at the
reduced hourly rate of $450.00 per hour.

Craig I. Kelley, Esq., attorney at the firm, attests that neither
nor the firm represent any interest adverse to the debtor or the
estate, and they are disinterested persons as required by 11 U.S.C.
Sec. 327(a).

The counsel can be reached through:

     Craig I. Kelley, Esq.
     Kelley & Fulton, P.L.
     1665 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
     The Forum - Suite 1000
     West Palm Beach, FL 33401
     Tel: (561) 491-1200
     Fax: (561) 684-3773
     Email: craig@kelleylawoffice.com

                    About Kantis Universal

Kantis Universal, LLC, is a privately held limited liability
company in Palm Beach, Florida, in the office administrative
services industry.

Kantis Universal filed voluntary petitions under chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. Secs. 101 et seq. (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Case no. 18-20240) on Aug. 15, 2018, listing under $1 million in
assets and liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Mindy A
Mora.  Craig I. Kelley at law firm of Kelley & Fulton, P.L., is the
Debtor's counsel.


KELLY GRAINGER: Proposes $600K Sale of Waxhaw Property
------------------------------------------------------
Kelly Grainger asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Florida to authorize the sale of the real property
located at 332 Old Mill Road, Waxhaw, North Carolina for $599,999,
subject to higher and better offers.

The mortgage holder, Wells Fargo, NA filed claim #4 in the case on
Aug. 21, 2017, reflecting a balance owed of $453,600.  The Debtor
desires to sell the property and apply the proceeds of the sale to
the mortgage with Wells Fargo.

The closing Statement is subject to approval of the mortgage
holders.  The Debtor desires to proceed to sell the property for
$599,999 or best offer, in the manner and form noticed by the
Debtor to all parties in interest.

The Debtor asks that the Court authorizes (i) the payment of all
closing costs and realtor commissions; (ii) the payment of the
mortgage held by Wells Fargo in full; (iii) the Debtor to deposit
the remaining proceeds into the DIP Account for the benefit of the
creditors.

Objections, if any, must be submitted within 21 days from the date
the Notice was served.

Kelly Grainger sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case
No. 17-50193) on June 26, 2017.  Charles M. Wynn, Esq., at Charles
M. Wynn Law Offices, P.A., serves as counsel to the Debtor.


KRUGER PRODUCTS: DBRS Puts BB Issuer Rating on Review Negative
--------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited placed Kruger Products L.P.'s (KPLP or the Company)
Issuer Rating of BB and Senior Unsecured Notes rating of BB (low)
with a Recovery Rating of RR5 Under Review with Negative
Implications. The rating action follows an announcement of KPLP's
plan to invest $575 million in a tissue plant in Sherbrooke,
Quebec, featuring a through-air-dry (TAD) machine (the Project).
The plant is expected to be financed with 40% equity and 60% debt
in a wholly owned, unrestricted subsidiary (TAD2Canco). A portion
of the equity will be financed by a $105 million convertible
debenture from Investissement Quebec at TAD2Canco; the remainder of
the financing is currently being finalized. Construction of the
Project is expected to begin in early 2019, and the plant is
anticipated to begin production in early 2021. At maturity, the
Project will produce approximately 70,000 metric tons per annum of
bathroom tissue and paper towels to increase KPLP's offering of
tissue products under the Cashmere, Sponge Towels and Purex
brands.

On April 16, 2018, DBRS noted that KPLP was currently evaluating
the installation of a second TAD paper machine in a new
unrestricted subsidiary. At that time, DBRS stated that should the
Company finance a meaningful portion of the Project with debt at
KPLP, it could have a negative impact on the Issuer Rating or
Recovery Rating on the Senior Unsecured Notes (see the DBRS press
release "DBRS Assigns Provisional Ratings to Kruger Products L.P."
dated April 16, 2018).

DBRS's ratings on KPLP are on a stand-alone basis using the
deconsolidated financial statements of KPLP, excluding unrestricted
subsidiaries. As the operations of existing unrestricted
subsidiaries could have a meaningful impact on cash flows at KPLP
-- either positive or negative -- DBRS has done an analysis of
these entities. DBRS notes that prior to the announcement of the
Project, if KPLP had been treated as a fully consolidated credit
that included the unrestricted subsidiaries, the Issuer Rating
would have likely been the same.

The Under Review with Negative Implications status mainly reflects
the uncertainty surrounding the remainder of the financing of the
Project. Should the Project be financed with a significant amount
of debt, even in an unrestricted subsidiary, DBRS may no longer
view the fully consolidated credit as having the same Issuer Rating
as KPLP on a deconsolidated basis, which could have a negative
impact on the current Issuer Rating of KPLP. Alternatively, if a
material portion of the equity component of the Project is funded
with debt at KPLP, and this debt ranks ahead of, or in line with,
the Senior Unsecured Notes, a downgrade to the Recovery Rating to
RR6 is likely, causing a one-notch downgrade to the Notes.

DBRS's review will focus on the business impact of the Project,
including its effect on the Company's revenues, market share and
operating efficiency, as well as the structure, terms and
conditions of the final financing package. DBRS will seek greater
insight on this to resolve the Under Review status of the ratings
as soon as possible.

KPLP's ratings are supported by its strong brands and market
positions in the Canadian tissue products market, efficient
production facilities and effective operations; stable tissue
products demand; and the significant barriers to entering the
tissue products market. The ratings also reflect the Company's
exposure to volatile commodity prices while operating in a highly
competitive industry, single-product/single-market exposure and the
strong bargaining power of major retailers.


LEVEL SOLAR: Plan Proposes to Transfer Assets to LSI Creditor Trust
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Solar, Inc. filed its first amended disclosure statement
relating to its plan of reorganization dated August 21, 2018.

In general, the Plan provides for (a) a transfer of substantially
all of the Debtor's assets to the LSI Creditor Trust; (b) payment
in full of Administrative Expenses, except as otherwise agreed with
holders of administrative claims, and as allowed by the  Bankruptcy
Court prior to Effective Date, with any outstanding Allowed
Administrative Claims to be paid by the Trustee of the LSI Creditor
Trustee on a pro rata basis if and when other administrative
expenses of the LSI Creditor Trust are paid; (c) then payment of
Allowed Priority Tax Claims on a pro rata basis by the Trustee of
the LSI Creditor Trustee on a pro rata basis if and when Allowed
Priority Tax Claims are paid; (d) then payment of Allowed Other
Priority Claims (e.g. employee wage claims) by the Trustee of the
LSI Creditor Trustee on a pro rata basis if and when other Allowed
Other Priority Claims are paid; (e) then payment of Allowed General
Unsecured Claims on a pro rata basis by the Trustee of the LSI
Creditor Trustee on a pro rata basis if and when Allowed General
Unsecured Claims are paid; (f) then payment of Allowed Subordinated
General Unsecured Claims on a pro rata basis by the Trustee of the
LSI Creditor Trustee on a pro rata basis if and when Allowed
Subordinated General Unsecured Claims are paid; and (g) then
distribution of all remaining assets of the LSI Creditor Trust back
to the Debtor.

As incentive for $3 million of General Secured Claims that agree to
be "subordinated" to the other General Unsecured Creditor Claims,
each holder of an Allowed Subordinated General Unsecured Claim will
receive a pro rata share of 50% of the total issued Equity Interest
of the Reorganized Debtor. Each holder of an Equity Interest as of
the Record Date will receive a new Equity Interest in the
Reorganized Debtor equal to a pro rata share of the remaining 50%
of the total issued Equity Interests of the Reorganized Debtor.
Although the Debtor believes that there will be sufficient assets
in the LSI Creditor Trust to ultimately pay all creditors, the
Trust Assets are all contingent subject to recovery by the trustee
over a period of years as more fully described herein. Therefore,
all Classes of creditors are impaired.

The Plan contemplates that there will be sufficient funds available
for the payment of Claims, and to the extent these funds are not
sufficient to pay all of the Claims, the Debtor is confident that,
based on the superior knowledge of the Trustee concerning how to
maximize the value of the Trust Assets and the agreement of certain
creditors to voluntarily subordinate their claims to those of the
other creditors, those holding Claims against the Debtor's estate
have a substantially greater chance of full recovery than if this
case were to be converted to one under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy
Code. In addition, the Debtor is confident that there will be
sufficient funds on hand in the LSI Creditor Trust to satisfy the
distributions and the obligations of the Trustee under the Plan, as
well as to carry on its business.

A copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb17-13469-226.pdf

                   About Level Solar

Based in New York, Level Solar Inc. operates under the solar-energy
installation industry.  Incorporated in 2013, the Company has
operations in Long Island, New York City and Massachusetts.

Level Solar filed for bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case
No. 17-13469) on Dec. 4, 2017.  In the petition signed by Richard
Pell, secretary of the Company, the Debtor estimated assets of $50
million to $100 million and debt of $1 million to $10 million.

Michael Conway, Esq., of Shipman & Goodwin LLP serves as bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtor.  Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP acts as
corporate counsel to the Debtor.


M&G USA: Seeks Sept. 5 Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extension
-------------------------------------------------------------
M&G USA Corp. and its affiliates has filed an amended second motion
requesting the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
to extend the period during which the Debtors have the exclusive
right to file a chapter 11 plan through and including September 5,
2018 and the period during which the Debtors have the exclusive
right to solicit acceptances thereof through and including November
4, 2018.

A hearing to consider extending the Exclusive Periods will be held
on Sept. 13, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.  Any response or objection to the
extension sought in the Amended Second Motion must be filed and
served on or before Sept. 4 at 4:00 p.m.

The Debtors relate that as of the filing of the Second Extension
Motion, a dispute existed between the Debtors and the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors regarding the Dismissal Motion of
the three Debtors that are Luxembourg entities.

Although the Debtors and the Committee worked in good faith to
resolve their differences and move forward with the filing of a
mutually acceptable chapter 11 plan in accordance with the Bid
Support Term Sheet prior to the expiration of the prior Exclusive
Filing Period of June 21, 2018, litigation concerning the Dismissal
Motion made such a filing impracticable.

Following the commencement of the hearing on the Dismissal Motion
and a day of testimony, the Debtors and the Committee announced a
settlement in principal resolving the Committee's objection to the
Dismissal Motion pursuant to the terms outlined in the Settlement
Term Sheet and paving the way for the filing of a chapter 11 plan.

Under the Dismissal Settlement, the Committee agreed to support, in
relevant part: (a) the dismissal of the Luxembourg Debtors' chapter
11 cases; (b) a chapter 11 plan of liquidation for the U.S.
Debtors; and (c) an extension of the Exclusive Filing Period to
August 20, 2018, as requested in the Second Extension Motion, with
any further extension of exclusivity subject to the Committee's
reasonable consent.

Although the Debtors and the Committee are in the process of
finalizing the terms of the U.S. Plan and expect to file the U.S.
Plan and related disclosure statement imminently, the Debtors
contend that they will not be in a position to file the U.S. Plan
by Aug. 20, 2018.

Accordingly the Debtors, with the consent of the Committee, seek a
further extension of the Exclusive Filing Period to ensure that
exclusivity does not lapse pending such filing, and to allow them
to deliver a plan that enjoys the support of its key creditor
constituencies and capitalizes on the progress made in these cases
to date.

As noted in the Second Extension Motion, over the past several
months, the Debtors have continued moving toward their primary goal
for these cases: maximizing the value of their assets for the
benefit of their stakeholders. After closing the sale of their
facility in Apple Grove, West Virginia and related intellectual
property to Far Eastern -- a sale that, in addition to generating
$33.5 million in proceeds for Debtor M&G Polymers USA, LLC's
creditors, preserved employee jobs and addressed other significant
liabilities -- the Debtors focused their efforts on the sale of the
Corpus Christi Assets, among other matters.

The Debtors negotiated and pursued a dual-track auction path with
respect to the Corpus Christi Assets to foster a competitive
bidding environment and ultimately designated Corpus Christi
Polymers LLC as the winning bidder. Thereafter, the Debtors
obtained financing from Corpus Christi Polymers to fund their
operations through the closing of the sale, and have since
negotiated an extension of that facility through October 2, 2018.
Because of the ongoing nature of plan negotiations and continuing
efforts to close the sale of the Corpus Christi Assets, allowing
the Exclusive Periods to lapse and permit parties to file competing
plans at this time would unnecessarily increase administrative
expenses and cause delays. Thus, the Debtors assert that cause
exists to extend the Exclusive Periods, and accordingly, the
Debtors request that the Court grant the Amended Second Motion.

                  About M & G USA Corporation

Founded in 1953, M&G Group is a privately owned chemical company in
Italy and is controlled through the holding company M&G Finanziaria
S.p.A.  The M&G Group -- specifically, its chemicals division, is a
producer of polyethylene terephthalate resin for packaging
applications.

M & G USA Corporation and affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12307) on Oct. 30, 2017.  In the
petition signed by CRO Dennis Stogsdill, the Debtors estimated $1
billion to $10 billion both in assets and liabilities.

Judge Brendan L. Shannon presides over the cases.

Jones Day is the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtors hired
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as conflicts counsel and
co-counsel; Crain Caton & James, P.C., as special counsel; Alvarez
& Marsal North America, LLC as restructuring advisor; Rothschild
Inc. and Rothschild S.p.A. as financial advisors and investment
bankers; and Prime Clerk LLC as administrative advisor.

On Nov. 13, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP as its legal counsel; Cole
Schotz, as Delaware co-counsel; Berkeley Research Group, LLC, as
financial advisor; and Jefferies LLC, as investment banker.


MEEKER NORTH: Seeks Oct. 22 Exclusive Period Extension
------------------------------------------------------
Meeker North Dawson Nursing, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Georgia for an extension of the
exclusive periods within which it may file and solicit acceptances
of its Chapter 11 plan through and including Oct. 22, 2018 and Dec.
21, 2018, respectively.

The Debtor submits that cause exists for granting the requested
extension of the exclusive periods for filing a Chapter 11 plan and
soliciting acceptances thereto. Since the commencement of the case,
the Debtor has worked diligently to maintain continuity in the
everyday operation of its businesses, while simultaneously working
to preserve and build the value of its assets.

Additionally, the Debtor has been working on reviewing claims and
reducing costs in an effort to formulate a feasible plan to repay
all creditors in full.  Thus, cause exists to extend the deadlines
for filing a Chapter 11 plan and soliciting acceptances thereto for
an additional 90 days.

                About Meeker North Dawson Nursing

Meeker North Dawson Nursing, LLC, sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 18-56883) on
April 24, 2018.  In the petition signed by Christopher F. Brogdon,
managing member, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000
and liabilities of less than $1 million.  

Theodore N. Stapleton P.C. serves as its legal counsel; and Synergy
Healthcare Resources, LLC, as its financial advisor.

Daniel M. McDermott, the U.S. Trustee for Region 21, appointed
William J. Whited as the patient care ombudsman in the Chapter 11
case of Meeker North Dawson Nursing, LLC.


MID-SOUTH GEOTHERMAL: Seeks Aug. 30 Exclusive Period Extension
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mid-South Geothermal, LLC requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Tennessee to extend the time to file its
Disclosure Statement and Plan from August 20, 2018 to and through
Aug. 30, 2018, and that the time to obtain acceptance of such Plan
be extended accordingly.

Unless extended, the exclusive period for the Debtor to file a
Disclosure Statement expires on August 20, 2018 pursuant to 11
U.S.C. 1129(e)(2).

The Debtor represents that it is in the final stages of formulating
a Plan of Reorganization and requires additional time to complete
the draft. The Debtor believes that if granted an extension of time
to file a Disclosure Statement and Plan, a more meaningful and
acceptable Plan will be filed.

Accordingly, the Debtor requests an additional 10-day extension of
the deadline to file its Disclosure Statement and Plan and the
attendant exclusive period within which only the Debtor may file a
Plan and obtain acceptance of a Plan.

                   About Mid-South Geothermal

Mid-South Geothermal, LLC, installs geothermal heating and cooling
systems for large commercial projects.  Its principal place of
business is located at 28 Superior Lane Gray, Kentucky.

Mid-South Geothermal filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 18-21498) on Feb. 20, 2018, listing
$2.04 million in total assets and $2.14 million in total
liabilities.  The petition was signed by Scott W. Triplett,
president.  Judge David S. Kennedy presides over the case.  Steven
N. Douglass, Esq., at Harris Shelton Hanover Walsh, PLLC, serves as
the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


MONTGOMERY SERVICES: Needs Clearer Record of Income & Expenses
--------------------------------------------------------------
Montgomery Services, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida to extend the Debtor's exclusive
periods the Debtors may propose a plan of reorganization and
solicit acceptances to the plan through and including Nov. 21,
2018, and Jan. 22, 2019, respectively.

The Debtors have the exclusive right to file a plan through and
including Aug. 23, 2018, and have the exclusive right to solicit
acceptances through and including Oct. 22, 2018.

The Debtors currently require additional time to establish a
clearer track record of income and expenses in order to formulate a
feasible plan.  In addition, the Debtors are currently seeking
resolutions with several creditors, which will also have a material
effect on the plan.

A copy of the Debtor's request is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb18-15699-39.pdf

                   About Montgomery Services

Montgomery Services, Inc., dba Mammoth Restoration of the Palm
Beaches, is a leader in Pennsylvania repair and restoration.
Montgomery Services filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-15699) on
May 11, 2018. In the petition signed by its president, Nathan M
Smith, the Debtor disclosed under $500,000 both in assets and
liabilities.  Aaron A. Wernick, Esq., at Furr & Cohen, is the
Debtor's counsel.


NATIONAL MANAGEMENT: Has Until Dec. 21 to Exclusively File Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Christine M. Gravelle of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey has extended, at the behest of National
Management and Preservation Services LLC, the Debtor's exclusive
periods during which only the Debtor has the right to file a plan
of reorganization and to solicit acceptances of the plan through
and including Dec. 21, 2018, and Feb. 19, 2019, respectively.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Aug. 2, 2018, among
the several facts that support extending the Exclusive Period and
Solicitation Period is that the case was originally filed as an
involuntary case.  Thus, the Debtor had no opportunity prior to the
commencement of the case to consider Plan options.  An Official
Committee of Creditors was not appointed until July 20, 2018,
approximately three months after the entry of the court order for
relief.  

A copy of the court order is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb18-16859-76.pdf

                   About National Management and
                      Preservation Services

Based in Red Bank, New Jersey, National Management and Preservation
Services LLC -- http://www.nationalfieldnetwork.com/-- provides
management services on a contract or fee basis.

Petitioning creditors Garden State Property Services, Inc., The
Cole Team, Inc., and Eleuteria Sandra Hering filed a Chapter 7
petition against National Management (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No.
18-16859) on April 6, 2018.  The Chapter 7 case was converted to a
case under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on April 25, 2018.

The petitioning creditors are represented by David E. Shaver, Esq.,
at Broege, Neumann, Fischer & Shaver, in Manasquan, New Jersey.

Brian L. Baker, Esq., and Chad Brian Friedman, Esq., at Ravin
Greenberg, LLC, in Newark, New Jersey, serve as counsel to the
Debtor.


NMSOOH INC: Delays Plan to Formulate Financial Projections
----------------------------------------------------------
NMSOOH, Inc., d/b/a National Media Services, and NMS Fabrications,
Inc. ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New
York to extend their respective exclusive periods in which they may
file a chapter 11 plan and solicit acceptances thereof through and
including: (a) for NMSOOH -- Sept. 17, 2018 to file a plan and Oct.
31, 2018 by which to solicit acceptances of such plan; and (b) for
NMS Fabrications -- Oct. 17, 2018 to file a plan and Dec. 17, 2018
by which to solicit acceptances of such plan, respectively.  

A hearing will be held on Sept. 10, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. during which
time the Court will consider extending the Exclusivity Periods.
Objections are due by Sept. 4 at 4:30 p.m.

Absent an extension, the exclusive period within which each of the
Debtors must file a plan currently expires on Aug. 20, 2018.  This
is the Debtors' first request for an extension of their respective
exclusivity periods.

On Nov. 5, 2014, the Court approved, on an interim basis, NMSOOH's
use of cash collateral and additional funding through a factoring
agreement with Bluevine Capital Inc., with a final hearing
currently scheduled for Sept. 6, 2018.

On June 1, 2018, Bari Lepelstat and David Lepelstat filed a motion
to dismiss NMSOOH's case.  After having been fully briefed, the
Parties recently negotiated and entered into a Stipulation of
Settlement, subject to the Court's approval. Thus, NMSOOH and its
professionals can now devote their time in engaging in the plan
process. The Debtors anticipate filing a motion to approve that
settlement within the next several days.

In relevant part, subject to approval of the Stipulation of
Settlement and the Exclusivity Motion, NMSOOH will have until Sept.
17, 2018 by which to file a proposed plan that has been reviewed
and approved by the Lepelstats, with confirmation of such plan to
occur no later than October 31, 2018.

This is the first request made by each of the Debtors. During that
time, the Debtors have been focused on stabilizing their respective
businesses and implementing top down best practices as to financial
management.  The claims bar date in each of the Debtors' cases
recently passed on July 2, 2018, and the Debtors have begun to
evaluate the claims filed against them.

In the case of NMSOOH, several merchant advance companies filed
claims, as well as private investors, including members of the
Lepelstat family. Thus, the Debtor assert that they need additional
time to engage with their creditors in a meaningful discussion so
that viable plans of reorganization can be offered.

In addition, the Debtors have begun working with their
professionals to formulate financial projections for each of the
Debtors' future business operations on which a viable
reorganization plan could be presented to the Court and the
Debtors' respective creditors. The Debtors and their professionals
understand that if either plan proposes to pay creditors over time,
the respective Debtor will need to produce reasonable and reliable
financial projections demonstrating an ability to successfully
emerge from Chapter 11. Although the Debtors' business operations
are not large, the Debtor nonetheless requires additional time to
compile such information in a presentable manner.

The Debtors expect to have cash flow projections completed within
the next several weeks, and thereafter be able to formulate a
feasible plan based on such projections.

Moreover, given the facts of this case, including the state of each
Debtors' books and records and the litigation with the Lepelstats,
the Debtors contend that the current exclusive period has not
provided a sufficient amount of time to file a Chapter 11 Plan, to
negotiate an order for use of cash collateral, respond to the
Motion to Dismiss, and to create financial projections for emerging
from Chapter 11.

Based on the foregoing, the Debtors aver that the requested
extension of their respective Exclusive Periods is clearly an
effort to work with, rather than pressure, the various creditor
constituencies in each case. Although progress has been made, the
Debtors require extensions of their respective Exclusive Periods to
give them time to negotiate with their creditors, and develop
necessary financial projections, and assist those parties in
understanding the Debtors' business operation as they relate to
their respective proposed plans.

Thus, the Debtors assert that granting the requested extensions
will allow the Debtors to finalize their respective financial
projections, prepare adequate information and to proceed with a
viable plan.

                     About NMSOOH, Inc., d/b/a
                      National Media Services

NMSOOH, Inc., based in Copiague, NY, and its affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-72671) on
April 20, 2018.  The Hon. Louis A. Scarcella (18-72671) and Robert
E. Grossman (18-72675), preside over the cases.  In the petition
signed by Eric S. Drucker, president and CEO, the Debtors estimated
up to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  Richard J. McCord, a partner of Certilman Balin Adler
& Hyman, LLP, serves as bankruptcy counsel.


ORTHOPAEDIC AND NEURO: Hires Scarlett, Croll & Myers as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Orthopaedic and Neuro Imaging, LLC, seeks authority from the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland (Baltimore) to
hire Scarlett, Croll & Myers, P.A. as counsel to the Debtor.

Services that Scarlett, Croll & Myers, P.A. may render to the
Debtor are:

     (a) advise the Debtor of its rights, powers and duties as a
debtor;

     (b) advise the Debtor concerning, and assisting in the
negotiation and documentation of financing agreements, debt
re-structuring and related transactions;

     (c) represent the Debtor in defense of any proceedings
instituted to reclaim property or to obtain relief from the
automatic stay under Sec. 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code;

     (d) review the nature and validity of liens asserted against
the property of the Debtor and advising the Debtor concerning the
enforceability of such liens;

     (e) advise the Debtor concerning the actions that it might
take to collect and recover property for the benefit of the
Debtor's estate;

     (f) preparing on behalf of the Debtor all necessary and
appropriate applications, motions, pleadings, draft orders,
notices, schedules and other documents, and reviewing all financial
and other reports to be filed in this bankruptcy proceeding;

     (g) advise the Debtor concerning, and prepare responses to
applications, motions, pleadings, notices and other papers that may
be filed and served in this bankruptcy proceeding;

     (h) counsel the Debtor in connection with the formulation,
negotiation and promulgation of a plan of reorganization or
liquidation and related documents; and

     (i) performing all other legal services for and on behalf of
the Debtor that may be necessary or appropriate in the
administration of this bankruptcy proceeding.

Regular hourly fees of Scarlett, Croll & Myers, P.A. are:

     Robert B. Scarlett             $385
     Paralegals and Law Clerks      $125

Michael S. Myers, attorney of Scarlett, Croll & Myers, P.A.,
attests that his firm is a disinterested person as defined in 11
U.S.C. Sec. 101(14).

The counsel can be reached through:

     Michael S. Myers, Esq.
     SCARLETT, CROLL & MYERS, P.A.
     201 N. Charles Street, Suite 600
     Baltimore, MD 21201
     Phone: (410) 468-3100

               About Orthopaedic and Neuro Imaging

Orthopaedic and Neuro Imaging, LLC -- http://www.onisite.com/-- is
a healthcare company that provides diagnostic radiology service
available at its Lewes, Millsboro, Salisbury and Seaford locations.


Orthopaedic and Neuro Imaging filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case
no. 18-21188) on Aug. 22, 2018, listing $48,922 in total assets and
$16,591,501 in total liabilities. The petition was signed by
Richard Pfarr, stockholder and manager.  Judge Thomas J. Catliota
presides over the case.  Michael Stephen Myers, Esq. and Robert B.
Scarlett, Esq., at Scarlett, Croll & Myers, P.A., serve as counsel
to the Debtor.


PACIFIC DRILLING: Has Until Oct. 29 To Exclusively File Plan
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Michael E. Wiles of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York has extended, at the behest of
Pacific Drilling S.A. and its affiliates, the exclusive periods
during which only the Debtors can file a plan of reorganization and
solicit acceptances of plan through and including Oct. 29, 2018,
and Dec. 28, 2018, respectively.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Aug. 14, 2018, the
Debtors already filed a disclosure statement for its joint plan of
reorganization dated July 31, 2018, which provides for payment of
the claims of the Debtors' RCF Lenders, the SSCF Lenders and
general unsecured creditors in full and renders them unimpaired.
The Proposed Plan is a product of the Debtors' court-ordered
mediation and its salient terms are the result of hard bargaining
by all of the stakeholders.  The Debtors will not be in a position
to finalize and file all Proposed Plan-related documentation, and
start solicitation following approval of the Proposed Disclosure
Statement, until after the previous Exclusive Periods expire.
Thus, a further extension of the Exclusive Periods was needed.

A copy of the court order is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb17-13193-517.pdf

                       About Pacific Drilling

Pacific Drilling S.A. (OTC: PACDQ) a Luxembourg public limited
liability company (societe anonyme), operates an international
offshore drilling business that specializes in ultra-deepwater and
complex well construction services.  Pacific Drilling --
http://www.pacificdrilling.com/-- owns seven high-specification
floating rigs: the Pacific Bora, the Pacific Mistral, the Pacific
Scirocco, the Pacific Santa Ana, the Pacific Khamsin, the Pacific
Sharav and the Pacific Meltem.  All drillships are of the latest
generations, delivered between 2010 and 2014, with a combined
historical acquisition cost exceeding $5.0 billion.  The average
useful life of a drillship exceeds 25 years.

On Nov. 12, 2017, Pacific Drilling S.A. and 21 affiliates each
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-13193).  The
cases are pending before the Honorable Michael E. Wiles and are
jointly administered.

Pacific Drilling disclosed $5.46 billion in assets and $3.18
billion in liabilities as of Sept. 30, 2017.

The Debtors tapped Sullivan & Cromwell LLP as bankruptcy counsel
but was later replaced by Togut, Segal & Segal LLP; Evercore
Partners International LLP as investment banker; AlixPartners, LLP,
as restructuring advisor; Alvarez & Marsal Taxand, LLC as executive
compensation and benefits consultant; Ince & Co LLP and Jones
Walker LLP as special counsel; and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and
noticing agent.

The RCF Agent tapped Shearman & Sterling LLP, as counsel, and PJT
Partners LP, as financial advisor.

The ad hoc group of RCF Lenders engaged White & Case LLP as
counsel.

The SSCF Agent tapped Milbank Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, as
counsel, and Moelis & Company LLC, as financial advisor.

The Ad Hoc Group of Various Holders of the Ship Group C Debt, 2020
Notes and Term Loan B tapped Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &
Garrison, in New York as counsel.


PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL: S&P Affirms 'B' ICR, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B' issuer credit rating on PAREXEL
International Corp. The outlook is stable.

S&P said, "In addition, we affirmed our 'B' issue-level rating on
the company's senior secured credit facility, but revised the
recovery rating on this debt to '4' from '3'. The '4' recovery
rating reflects our expectation for average (30%-50%; rounded
estimate: 45%) recovery in the event of a payment default.

"At the same time, we affirmed our 'CCC+' issue-level rating on the
company's senior unsecured notes. The recovery rating on this debt
remains '6', indicating expectations for negligible (0%-10%;
rounded estimate: 5%) recovery in the event of a default.

"PAREXEL has performed largely in line with our expectations since
its LBO in September 2017, although it has continued to lag its
peers on revenue growth and booking metrics because of significant
cancellations for a few consecutive quarters prior to the
transaction. Free cash flow generation for the nine months period
ended March 31, 2018, has also been weak, but we expect meaningful
improvement in this metric in fiscal 2019 as some of the
transaction-related costs roll off. Overall, we think fiscal 2019
will be a transition year. The company has a new management team
and various cost-cutting initiatives in place. However, we project
a revenue growth rate that is below industry average, and very
modest margin improvement in fiscal 2019. Still, we think PAREXEL
will continue to benefit from CRO industry tailwinds as a top seven
CRO. We believe a stabilizing CRO segment and various cost-cutting
plans should lead to improving cash flow and support the 'B' issuer
credit rating.

"The stable outlook primarily reflects our expectation for a
meaningful improvement in free cash flow and booking metrics over
the next 12 months. This is underpinned by PAREXEL's leading
position in the CRO industry and our expectation of lower
transaction-related costs."



PARKPROVO LLC: Seeks Dec. 19 Exclusive Plan Filing Extension
------------------------------------------------------------
Parkprovo, LLC requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Utah to extend (1) the period during which the Debtor has the
exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan by 120 days, through and
including Dec. 19, 2018, and (2) the period during which the Debtor
has the exclusive right to solicit acceptances thereof through and
including Feb. 18, 2019, or 60 days after the expiration of the
Exclusive Filing Period, as extended.

The Debtor submits that cause exists to support the relief
requested.  The Debtor filed for relief on April 23, 2018 with the
intention to operate the Water Park and move forward with a sale to
Blue Island Group, LLC.

As described in the Debtor's Status Report, shortly after the
Petition Date, the Debtor entered into an agreement, in the
ordinary course of business, with Blue Island to operate the Water
Park and provide a nonrefundable $400,000 deposit.  But Blue Island
failed to perform under the terms of the agreement, and the Debtor
terminated the agreement with Blue Island on May 25, 2018.

Upon termination of the agreement with Blue Island, the Debtor
subsequently began negotiations with other potential lenders to
provide working capital to the Debtor to operate the Water Park.
Although terms were exchanged with potential lenders, no agreements
were met.

The Debtor's principals also entered into an extended period of
good faith negotiations with Seven Peaks Water Park Provo, Inc. and
Gary Brinton to resolve various disputes, including the adversary
proceeding, Case No. 18-2067, but were unable to reach a resolution
of the dispute.

The Debtor has now moved for the retention of Highland Commercial
Inc. as its broker and has negotiated debtor-in-possession
financing for continued maintenance of the Water Park until a sale
is consummated.

The Debtor submits that it has also located interim
debtor-in-possession financing to maintain the Water Park through
the marketing and sale process and will file a motion to approve
the same.

The Debtor intends to move forward with a sale of the Water Park
and resolve the pending Adversary Proceeding, and in moving forward
in its Chapter 11 case, may file a proposed plan and disclosure
statement providing for the liquidation of the Water Park.

                     About Parkprovo LLC

Parkprovo, LLC, is a privately-held company in Provo, Utah, that
owns a water park.  Parkprovo sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Utah Case No. 18-22860) on April 23,
2018.  In the petition signed by Robert Conte, managing member, the
Debtor estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Kimball R. Mosier
presides over the case. Holland & Hart LLP as Parkprovo's legal
counsel.


PEANUT CO: Seeks Nov. 21 Plan Exclusivity Perioad Extension
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Peanut Co, LLC and Eric and Kara Kallevig jointly ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas to extend by ninety
days the exclusive period during which only the Debtors may file a
plan through November 21, 2018 and confirm a plan through January
20, 2019.

Unless extended, the Exclusivity Periods expire on Aug. 23, 2018.

The Debtors assert that cause exists to grant an extension of the
Exclusivity Periods for a number of reasons.

The Debtors need additional time to work together to maximize the
proceeds of the sale of property securing the obligation to
ReadyCap Lending LLC, and Sutherland 2016-1 JPM Grantor Trust and
to negotiate potential restructuring alternatives. Additionally,
for various reasons -- some beyond the Debtors' control -- the
Section 341 meeting in this case will not be held until September
21, 2018. Consequently, neither the U.S. Trustee nor the creditor
body will have an opportunity to question the Debtors in this
administratively consolidated case before exclusivity expires.

The Debtors assert that these Chapter 11 cases have been pending
for less than 120 days as of the date of filing this Motion and
this is the Debtors' first joint request for an extension of the
Exclusivity Periods.

The Debtors contend that their purpose in seeking extension of the
Exclusivity Periods is a good faith effort to establish a viable
chapter 11 exit strategy that takes into account the interests of
the various constituencies involved in the case, particularly the
Debtors' primary secured creditors, Readycap and Sutherland.
Initially, the Debtors had planned on paying a significant amount
toward its secured debt upon sale of the Debtors Eric and Kara
Kallevigs' residence, which also serves as Readycap/Sutherland's
collateral.  That sale has recently fallen through, so the Debtors
require more time to market the residence to reduce the amount of
Readycap/Sutherland's secured claim (and, thus, the amount of the
secured claim that must be paid through the plan).

In addition, the Debtors are current on all quarterly fees due to
the U.S. Trustee, and, to the extent applicable, employee payroll
payments (including state and local taxes), insurance, and adequate
protection payments.

Thus, the Debtor believes that the requested extension will allow
them time to continue focusing their efforts on reducing the
outstanding balance owed to Readycap/Sutherland prior to
formulating a Chapter 11 plan (or other restructuring alternative)
that maximizes value of the bankruptcy estates for the benefit of
all stakeholders.

The Debtors are paying their bills as they become due, including in
the case of Debtor the Peanut the salaries of 40 employees who rely
on the Debtors for their livelihood, so the Debtors believe that
the extension should not result in prejudice to any creditor or
party in interest.

Finally, the Debtors assert that this is a critical time in Debtor
Peanut's business cycle. Summer break is over and new families are
signing up. Accordingly, revenues are up, and the Debtors are in a
better position to pay off property taxes (one of the major factors
leading to bankruptcy) and set aside cash to facilitate its
reorganization.

                       About The Peanut Co

The Peanut Co, LLC, is a privately held company whose principal
assets are located at 7489 W. 161st Overland Park, Kansas.  Peanut
Co and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kan. Case Nos. 18-20850 to 18-20852) on
April 25, 2018.  The debtor-affiliates are Marcy, LLC, and Eric Rue
Kallevig and Kara Lynn Kallevig.  In the petition signed by Eric
Rue Kallevig, sole member and owner, Peanut Co estimated assets of
less than $50,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.
The Debtors hired Patton Knipp Dean LLC and Mann Conroy, LLC, as
legal counsel, and Carpani and Gordon, P.A., as special tax
counsel.


POLICLINICA FAMILIAR: Continuing Operation of Business to Fund Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Policlinica Familiar Shalom Inc. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Puerto Rico a disclosure statement in
support of its chapter 11 plan dated August 21, 2018.

The Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan proposes to pay creditors pursuant to
a schedule of deferred cash payments, under a 7-year term,
beginning on its effective date, with cash to be received from the
continuing operation of its business and/or additional cash
contributions from its shareholders and/or DIP financing if
necessary.

The Plan classifies all Debtor claims in 7 classes, providing for 1
class of priority claims; 3 classes of secured claims; 2 classes of
general unsecured claims; and 1 class of equity security holders.

General unsecured creditors holding allowed claims will receive
cash distributions which the proponent of the Plan has valued at
10% and 5% of the allowed amount of the claim or scheduled amount,
depending on whether or not a claim was timely filed.

The financial projections show that the Debtor will have enough
cash flow, after paying operating expenses and post-confirmation
taxes, to finance the Plan. The final Plan payment is expected to
be paid on the 84th month following the effective date of the
Plan.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb17-02544-11-108.pdf

Counsel for Debtor  Policlinica Familiar Shalom Inc.:

     Jose R. Cintron, Esq.
     USDC-PR 208411
     605 Condado, Suite 602
     Santurce, Puerto Rico 00907
     Tel 787-725-4027
     Cel 787-605-3342
     Fax 787-725-1709
     jrcintron@prtc.net
     lawoffice602@gmail.com

           About Policlinica Familiar Shalom Inc

Policlinica Familiar Shalom Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 17-02544) on April 12, 2017.  The Debtor is
engaged in the health care business as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section
101(27A) whose principal assets are located at Carr 2 Km 101.6
Barrio Terranova Quebradillas, PR 00678.  The Company said it is
suffering economic hardship and is in the process of losing its
business premises in foreclosure proceedings.

The Debtor's Counsel is Jose Ramon Cintron, Esq., in San Juan,
Puerto Rico.

At the time of filing, the Debtor had estimated assets of $0 to
$50,000 and estimated liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.


POPLAR CREEK: Seeks Dec. 31, 2018 Exclusive Plan Period Extension
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Poplar Creek, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Illinois to extend the Exclusive Periods to file and to
obtain acceptances of its Plan to and including Dec. 31, 2018 and
Feb. 28, 2019, respectively.

Pursuant to Section 1121(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtor
originally has the exclusive right to file a Plan through and
including Sept. 15, 2018, and pursuant to Section 1121(c)(3) of the
Bankruptcy Code, the Debtor has the exclusive right to obtain
acceptances of its Plan through and including Nov. 15, 2018.

The Debtor owns the property commonly known as 2401 West Higgins
Road, Hoffman Estates, Illinois.  A portion of the Property is
improved with a conference center and banquet facility that is
currently being leased to an entity known as Stonegate Conference &
Banquet Centre, LLC.  Another portion of the Property is scheduled
for development as a hotel (the "Hotel Project").

First American Bank is the Debtor's primary secured creditor that
originally extended mortgage financing to the Debtor in February
2004.  On Oct. 20, 2017, First American Bank demanded payment in
full from the Debtor by serving a default notice upon the Debtor.

After the Debtor failed to pay the amounts due to First American
Bank as demanded, First American Bank commenced a foreclosure
action against the Debtor and others on November 9, 2017, in the
Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois. In the Foreclosure Action,
First American Bank sought the appointment of a receiver.

The Debtor contends that in the event a receiver was appointed, the
Debtor would have been unable to complete the development of the
Hotel Project thereby eliminating any prospect of recovery for
creditors other than First American Bank.

The Debtor has options for completing its reorganization and
implementing a successful exit strategy from this Chapter 11 case.
The Debtor has been diligently pursuing the administration of this
Chapter 11 case with a view toward formulating a prompt exit
strategy. The Debtor is currently defending against Motions filed
by First American Bank relating to relief from the automatic stay
and for designation of the Debtor as a "single asset real estate
debtor."

First American Bank's Motions are currently scheduled for a status
hearing before the Court on September 6, 2018. The Court's rulings
on the Bank's Motions will have much to do with the type of exit
strategy from this Chapter 11 case that can be formulated and
implemented.

The Debtor is also engaged in discussions with third parties over
the development and construction of the Hotel Project as well as
with respect to the possibility of the sale of the Property, in
whole or in part. These discussions require additional time to
develop into offers that would form the cornerstone of any Plan.
The Debtor has also recently approached First American Bank about a
settlement that would incorporate one or more of these
possibilities.

Accordingly, the Debtor believes that extending the Exclusive
Periods will facilitate the its efforts in completing its Chapter
11 case, pursuing an exit strategy from this Chapter 11 case and
resolving issues with First American Bank.

                      About Poplar Creek

Poplar Creek, LLC, is a privately-held company that owns the
property located at 2401 West Higgins Road, Hoffman Estates,
Illinois.  Poplar Creek sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 18-14161) on May 15,
2018.  In the petition signed by George M. Moser, manager, the
Debtor estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge LaShonda A. Hunt
presides over the case.  Burke, Warren, MacKay & Serritella, P.C.,
serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.



PRECISION CASTPARTS: Egan-Jones Hikes Sr. Unsecured Ratings to B+
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Egan-Jones Ratings Company, on August 24, 2018, upgraded the
foreign currency and local currency senior unsecured ratings on
debt issued by Precision Castparts Corporation to B+ from B.

Headquartered in Portland, Oregon, Precision Castparts Corporation
is an American industrial goods and metal fabrication company that
manufactures investment castings, forged components, and airfoil
castings for use in the aerospace, industrial gas turbine, and
defense industries.


PURADYN FILTER: Signs New Distributor Agreement with MNI
--------------------------------------------------------
Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated has entered into a new
agreement with MNI Diesel, LLC with locations in Houston, TX and
Corpus Christi, TX whereby MNI will become the exclusive
distributor of Puradyn products to the commercial marine industry
for the Ohio and Mississippi River Valleys and the U.S. Gulf Coast
of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama.

Ed Vittoria, CEO of Puradyn, remarked, "We are very pleased to
expand upon our successful relationship with MNI.  As reported in
our recent second quarter results, we have seen a significant
increase in revenues this year across several categories.  Our
exclusive distributor agreement in the oil and gas sector continues
to build momentum and provides exposure to end clients that would
be difficult to secure on our own, and we believe there is a
similar opportunity within the commercial marine segment.  MNI has
been advocating for and installing Puradyn systems for over five
years, and we believe that their experience with our product is
invaluable in our expansion to other marine fleets as well as
signing additional marine distributors and engine repair facilities
to promote Puradyn systems.  We look forward to jointly growing
Puradyn awareness and usage and providing more marine customers
with an unprecedented reduction in engine maintenance and overall
life cycle cost."

Harry Lartigue Sr., MNI's founder, commented on the agreement, "MNI
is looking forward to our expanded partnership with Puradyn.  We
know firsthand how effective the Puradyn systems are in safely
extending oil change intervals and extending overall engine life
due to cleaner oil, and we strongly recommend them to our clients.
The commercial marine industry along the Gulf Coast and up through
the Mississippi and Ohio River Valleys offers significant
potential, and we will leverage our engine and maintenance
experience to drive sales for the most effective oil bypass
filtration system on the market."

                      About Puradyn Filter

Boynton Beach, Fla.-based Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated
(OTC BB: PFTI) -- http://www.puradyn.com/-- designs, manufactures,
markets and distributes worldwide the Puradyn bypass oil filtration
system for use with substantially all internal combustion engines
and hydraulic equipment that use lubricating oil.

Puradyn Filter incurred a net loss of $1.23 million in 2017
compared to a net loss of $1.44 million in 2016.  As of June 30,
2018, Puradyn Filter had $2.02 million in total assets, $10.92
million in total liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of
$8.89 million.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Liggett &
Webb, P.A. on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017, includes an explanatory paragraph stating that
the Company has experienced net losses since inception and negative
cash flows from operations and has relied on loans from related
parties to fund its operations.  These factors raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


QUANTUM CORP: Secures up to $20 Million Additional Term Loans
-------------------------------------------------------------
Quantum Corporation entered into a Joinder and Fourth Amendment to
Term Loan Credit and Security Agreement on Aug. 23, 2018, amending
that certain Term Loan Credit and Security Agreement, dated Oct.
21, 2016, by and among the Company, TCW Asset Management Company
LLC, as agent, and the lenders.  The Term Loan Amendment provides
for up to $20 million of additional delayed draw term loans,
including $6,700,000 that was drawn at closing, and also amends,
among other things, (i) the definition of "EBITDA" by modifying
certain addbacks for transaction and other costs and expenses, (ii)
the maturity date of the entire facility under the Term Loan
Agreement by bringing it forward to Jan. 31, 2019, (iii) the
principal and interest payments due Sept. 30, 2018 and Dec. 31,
2018, totaling approximately $4.0 million, were deferred until the
maturity date, (iv) the financial covenants and related
definitions, and (v) certain reporting requirements.  The
applicable interest rate under the Term Loan Agreement was not
modified in the Term Loan Amendment.  The Term Loan Amendment
requires that the Company comply with certain milestones regarding
a potential refinancing or other repayment transaction.  If the
Company is unable to complete a Refinancing Transaction by Jan. 31,
2019, the Company will be unable to meet its obligations to the
lenders and will be in default under the Term Loan Agreement.
Quantum LTO Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and
newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company also became a
party to, and a guarantor under, the Term Loan Agreement pursuant
to the Term Loan Amendment.

The Company views the Term Loan Amendment and the Revolving Loan
Amendment as an interim step in its implementation of a
comprehensive refinancing package, which it anticipates completing
by the end of calendar year 2018.  The Company has retained
financial advisors to assist its refinancing efforts.  The Company
anticipates that the proceeds from the Term Loan Amendment are to
be used to pay accounting, legal, and other expenses associated
with the Company's Audit Committee's independent investigation and
its response to a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange
Commission regarding the Company's accounting practices and
internal controls, and for general working capital purposes.

Under the terms of the Term Loan Amendment, the definition of
"EBITDA" was amended to provide for certain addbacks to EBITDA and
remove a category of deductions from EBITDA.  Previously, only
extraordinary, unusual, or non-recurring non-cash costs, non-cash
expenses and non-cash losses and extraordinary, unusual or
non-recurring cash costs, cash expense, and cash losses in an
aggregate amount not to exceed $3.0 million in any fiscal year
commencing with the fiscal year commencing on April 1, 2018 was
allowed to be added back to the calculation of EBITDA.  Under the
Term Loan Amendment, this was changed to be measured on a quarterly
basis and the quarterly threshold was set at no more than $750,000
per quarter commencing with the fiscal quarter commencing on July
1, 2018.  Previously, service parts lower of cost or market
adjustment up to an aggregate amount not to exceed $8.0 million in
any fiscal year was added back to EBITDA.  Under the Term Loan
Amendment, this was changed to be measured on a quarterly basis and
the quarterly threshold was set at no more than $2.0 million.  The
updated definition of EBITDA under the Term Loan Amendment also
adds back to EBITDA: (i) the reasonable transaction costs and
expenses incurred in connection with the second amendment and third
amendment to the Term Loan Agreement and this Term Loan Amendment,
including the costs and expenses resulting from the issuance of the
warrant; and (ii) the reasonable fees, costs and expenses incurred
in connection with the SEC Inquiry and the Refinancing Transaction
not to exceed $4.0 million in any fiscal quarter.  Finally, the
updated definition of EBITDA removes the deduction from EBITDA of
any amount by which the aggregate total controlled spend of the
Company in any fiscal quarter exceeds $51.8 million.

The financial covenant provision in the Term Loan Agreement was
amended to eliminate the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant, the
senior net leverage ratio covenant, and the total leverage ratio
covenant, all of which were replaced with an obligation to maintain
a minimum amount of EBITDA on a quarterly basis.  The Company must
maintain at least $4.6 million of EBITDA for the fiscal quarter
ended Sept. 30, 2018 and at least $8.5 million of EBITDA for the
fiscal quarter ended Dec. 31, 2018.  The minimum cash covenant was
not changed in the Term Loan Amendment.

The Company's requirement to deliver to the lender annual audited
financial statements for fiscal 2018 was extended to Jan. 31, 2019,
and the Company must also provide more frequent updates containing
specified financial information.

Under the Term Loan Amendment, the Company also agreed to comply
with a schedule of milestones related to a Refinancing Transaction.
These milestones, which relate to progress steps in the Company's
efforts to complete a Refinancing Transaction must be completed on
or prior to certain specified dates between
Aug. 24, 2018 and ending on Jan. 31, 2019.  Failure to comply with
any of these milestones, some of which are not within the direct
control of the Company, on or prior to the specified date
applicable to any such milestone (or such later date as the lender
agrees to in writing in its sole discretion) constitutes an event
of default under the Term Loan Agreement.

In connection with the execution of the Term Loan Amendment, the
Company agreed to pay the lenders certain fees, including the
payment of a $1.0 million commitment fee, a $2.5 million closing
fee (which fee is reduced to $1.25 million if the debt obligations
are paid in full in cash on the repayment date), a restructuring
fee in an amount equal to 5.0% of the principal balance of the term
loan as of the repayment date and certain fees associated with the
delayed draws on the term loan.  These fees are added to the
outstanding principal balance of the term loan and are required to
be paid by the Company on the repayment date.

Immediately following the execution of the Term Loan Amendment and
after giving effect to the initial drawdown following execution of
the Term Loan Amendment, the Company had outstanding an aggregate
of $98.2 million in total principal, including deferred fees, under
the Term Loan Agreement.

                     Warrants to Purchase Stock

In connection with the Term Loan Amendment, the Company agreed to
issue warrants to purchase stock to the lenders.  The number of
Warrants issued by the Company will depend on the timing of the
completion of the Refinancing Transaction and repayment in full of
its debt obligations to the lenders.  Initially, and within ten
business days of the execution of the Term Loan Amendment, the
Company will issue warrants to purchase three percent (3%) of the
outstanding common stock of the Company, with such warrants (x)
earned in full and vesting immediately on the date of issuance, and
(y) having an initial exercise price equal to the closing price of
the common stock of the Company on the business day immediately
prior to such date of issuance.  To the extent that the Company has
not completed a Refinancing Transaction and repaid in full the
entire amount owed to the lenders by Sept. 30, 2018, Oct. 31, 2018,
Nov. 30, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2018, then on each such date that the
Refinancing Transaction and repayment has not occurred, the Company
will be required to issue additional warrants to purchase three
percent (3%) of the outstanding common stock of the Company on each
such specified date, with each such warrant (if issued), (x) earned
in full and vesting immediately on the date of such issuance, and
(y) having an exercise price equal to the closing price of the
Company's common stock on the business day immediately prior to the
date of such issuance.  None of these warrants, if and when issued,
will be exercisable until Feb. 1, 2019.  In addition, on Feb. 1,
2019, the exercise price of each of the warrants that were issued
will be reset at the lower of (x) the applicable existing exercise
price for such warrant and (y) the lowest of the 5-day
volume-weighted average closing prices of the Company's common
stock for the last five trading days in the months of September
2018, October 2018, November 2018, December 2018 and January 2019.
At the time that the Company repays in full its debt obligations to
the lenders, the Company shall have the right to buy back, for a
price of $0.001 per share, fifty percent (50%) of the amount of any
of the Warrants issued, if any, on Sept. 30, 2018, Oct. 31, 2018,
Nov. 30, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2018 and within 30 days immediately
prior to such repayment date; provided that if the repayment date
occurs on or prior to Oct. 31, 2018, then the Company will have the
right to buy back, for a price of $0.001 per share, one hundred
percent (100%) of the Warrants issued on Sept. 30, 2018.

The exercise price and the number and type of shares underlying the
Warrants are subject to adjustment in the event of specified
events, including a reclassification of the Company's common stock,
a subdivision or combination of the Company's common stock or
specified dividend payments.  The Warrants are exercisable until
Aug. 31, 2023.  Upon exercise, the aggregate exercise price may be
paid, at each warrant holder's election, in cash or on a net
issuance basis, based upon the fair market value of the Company's
common stock at the time of exercise.

The issuance of the Warrants, and any shares of common stock
issuable thereunder, are exempt from registration pursuant to the
exemption for transactions by an issuer not involving any public
offering under Section 4(a)(2) the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Regulation D under the Securities Act.  The Warrants,
and any shares of common stock issuable thereunder, were not
registered under the Securities Act or any state securities laws
and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent
registration with the SEC or an applicable exemption from the
registration requirements.

In addition, with respect to warrants issued to the lenders on Feb.
14, 2018, an additional 75,000 shares became vested on
Aug. 23, 2018.

            Revolving Loan Amendment with PNC Bank

On Aug. 23, 2018, the Company also entered into a Fourth Amendment
and Joinder to Revolving Credit and Security Agreement, amending
that certain Revolving Loan Credit and Security Agreement, dated
Oct. 21, 2016, by and among the Company, PNC Bank, National
Association, as agent, and the lender parties thereto.  The
Revolving Loan Amendment amends, among other things, (i) the
definition of "Borrowing Base" to provide for up to $5,250,000 of
additional availability, (ii) the maturity date of the entire
facility by bringing it forward to Jan. 31, 2019, (iii) the
definition of "EBITDA" by modifying certain addbacks and
eliminating a specified deduction (in the same manner as described
above in the Term Loan Amendment), (iv) the financial covenants and
related definitions, and (v) certain reporting requirements. The
applicable interest rate under the Revolving Loan Agreement was not
modified in the Revolving Loan Amendment.  The Revolving Loan
Amendment also requires that the Company comply with certain
milestones relating to the Refinancing Transaction (in the same
manner as described above in the Term Loan Amendment).  The failure
to comply with these milestones results in an event of default.
Quantum LTO became a borrower under the Revolving Loan Agreement
pursuant to the Revolving Loan Amendment.  

In connection with the execution of the Revolving Loan Amendment,
the Company agreed to pay the lenders certain fees, including a
$600,000 amendment fee, a $150,000 increased availability fee and a
$1,600,000 restructuring fee (which fee is reduced to $800,000 if
the lenders participate in the Refinancing Transaction). $450,000
of these fees were paid in connection with the Revolving Loan
Amendment and the remainder are to be paid on the earlier to occur
of the repayment date or Jan. 31, 2019.

                        About Quantum Corp.

Based in San Jose, California, Quantum Corp. (NYSE:QTM) --
http://www.quantum.com/-- is a scale-out tiered storage, archive
and data protection company, providing solutions for capturing,
sharing, managing and preserving digital assets over the entire
data lifecycle.  From small businesses to major enterprises, more
than 100,000 customers have trusted Quantum to address their most
demanding data workflow challenges.  Quantum's end-to-end, tiered
storage foundation enables customers to maximize the value of their
data by making it accessible whenever and wherever needed,
retaining it indefinitely and reducing total cost and complexity.

As of Sept. 30, 2017, Quantum Corp had $211.2 million in total
assets, $335.5 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $124.3 million.   

On Jan. 11, 2018, Quantum received a subpoena from the SEC
regarding its accounting practices and internal controls related to
revenue recognition for transactions commencing April 1, 2016.
Following receipt of the SEC subpoena, the Company's audit
committee began an independent investigation with the assistance of
independent advisors, which is currently in process.

On Feb. 15, 2018, the New York Stock Exchange notified Quantum that
it is not in compliance with the NYSE's continued listing standard
because the company has not timely filed its Form 10-Q for its
fiscal third quarter 2018 ended Dec. 31, 2017.


R.E. GAS DEVELPMENT: Talks With Creditors Delay Plan Filing
-----------------------------------------------------------
R.E. Gas Development, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to extend
the exclusive periods during which only the Debtors can file a
Chapter 11 plan and solicit acceptance of the plan through and
including Jan. 15, 2019, and March 14, 2019, respectively.

A hearing is scheduled for Sept. 17, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. (ET) to
solicit acceptance of the plan.  Objections to the request must be
filed by Sept. 10, 2018, at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

The Debtors currently have until Sept. 17, 2018, to exclusively
file a plan and until Nov. 14, 2018, to exclusively solicit
acceptances of the plan.

Since filing their Chapter 11 cases, the Debtors have made
significant progress toward their goal for these cases -- executing
a successful reorganization that maximizes the value of their
estates for the benefit of all of the Debtors' stakeholders—while
also implementing various measures to continue efficient
operations.  The Debtors have earned the Court's approval of
bidding procedures and, in accordance therewith, implemented a
robust sale process for their assets.  While the Debtors have file
a proposed plan of reorganization and a related disclosure
statement, the Debtors and their lenders and noteholders and the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors are engaged in extensive
negotiations to reach a global resolution for the benefit of all of
the Debtors' stakeholders.  If this motion to extend is not
granted, then another party could file a proposed plan of
reorganization that derails these good faith negotiations and
reduces the possibility of reaching a consensual resolution for
these cases in the near term or ever.  The distraction of a
competing plan would inevitably delay these cases, which delay is
at the expense of the Debtors' stakeholders.

The Debtors' proposed plan contemplates a "toggle" feature,
toggling from a sale-based plan to a debt-for-equity plan based on
the outcome of the Debtors' sale process.  Inevitably, a competing
plan would negatively affect the Debtors' sale process and efforts
and provide no benefit to the Debtors' stakeholders, particularly
at this time in these cases.  The interference would thwart the
progress made to date without any corresponding benefits.

Based on the relevant factors, there is more than sufficient cause
to approve the extension of the Exclusive Periods requested by the
Debtors:

     -- these cases are large and complex.  As set forth in the
        First Day Declaration, the Debtors filed these cases to
        address approximately $884 million in debt, including
        numerous layers of funded debt and hedging obligations.
        The Debtors' equity adds another layer of complexity.  In
        addition, the path forward for these Cases largely
        revolves around the sale process and the resulting
        proceeds received, which process is ongoing.  Taking into
        consideration these variables, it is apparent that
        reorganizing an enterprise of the Debtors' size and
        complexity requires significant time and effort.  For
        these reasons alone, cause exists to extend the Exclusive
        Periods;

     -- since filing these cases, the Debtors have continued to
        pay substantially all of their postpetition, undisputed
        expenses and invoices in the ordinary course of business
        or as otherwise provided by order of the Court;

     -- the Debtors' sale process is ongoing.  The result of the
        auction will provide critical information necessary to
        determine by which path the Plan will proceed;

     -- these cases are approximately three months old.  The
        requested extension of the Exclusive Periods is the first
        request made in these cases and comes approximately three
        months after the Petition Date.  During this time, the
        Debtors have dedicated significant time and resources on
        continuing efficient operations, negotiating the DIP
        Facility and the Bidding Procedures Order, complying with
        the requirements of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and the
        Bankruptcy Rules, administering their estates and
        negotiating a global resolution for these cases with their

        key creditor constituencies;

     -- the Debtors have filed a plan.  The Debtors have filed the

        Plan and the Disclosure Statement, which provides for a
        toggle feature based on the results of the Debtors' sale
        process; and

     -- an extension will not pressure creditors.  The Debtors are

        not seeking an extension of the Exclusive Periods to
        pressure or prejudice any of their stakeholders.  Rather,
        the Debtors are seeking an extension of the Exclusive
        Periods to preserve and build on the progress made to
        date.  The Debtors' efforts in this respect will benefit,
        not prejudice, their creditors.

A copy of the Debtors' request is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/pawb18-22032-773.pdf

                      About Rex Energy Corp.

Rex Energy Corporation -- http://www.rexenergy.com/-- and its
subsidiaries are independent oil and gas companies operating in the
Appalachian Basin, engaged in the acquisition, production,
exploration and development of oil, natural gas and natural gas
liquids.  They are focused on drilling and exploration activities
in the Marcellus Shale, Utica Shale and Upper Devonian Shale.  Rex
Energy is headquartered in State College, Pennsylvania and became a
public company in 2007.  

On May 18, 2018, Chapter 11 cases were filed by Rex Energy
Corporation (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 18-22033) and its affiliates
R.E. Gas Development, LLC (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 18-22032), Rex
Energy Operating Corp. (Case No. 18-22034), and Rex Energy I, LLC
(Case No. 18-22035).  R.E. Gas Development is the lead case.

In the petitions signed by Thomas C. Stabley, president and CEO,
the Debtors listed total assets of $851,000,957 and total debt of
$984,529,090 as of April 30, 2018.

Judge Jeffery A. Deller presides over the cases.

James D. Newell, Esq., Timothy P. Palmer, Esq., and Tyler S.
Dischinger, Esq., at Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC and Scott J.
Greenberg, Esq., Michael J. Cohen, Esq., Anna Kordas, Esq., Thomas
A. Howley, Esq., and Rachel Biblo Block, Esq., at Jones Day, serve
as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.

The Debtors tapped Perella Weinberg Partners as their investment
banker; FTI Consulting, Inc., as financial advisor; and Prime Clerk
LLC as claims and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors on May 29, 2018.  The Committee
tapped Brown Rudnick LLP as its lead counsel; and Leech Tishman
Fuscaldo & Lampl, LLC, as its local counsel.


RALSTON-LIPPINCOTT: Proposes $338K Private Sale of Chester Property
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralston-Lippincott-Hasbrouck-Ingrassia Funeral Home, Inc., and its
affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of New York to authorize their private sale of the improved real
property located at 92 Main Street, Village of Chester, Orange
County, New York 10918, Section 111, Block 1, Lot 28.1, to the
Village of Chester for $338,085.

The Debtor owns the Chester Property.  It consists of what was
originally a single family home.  The use of the property was
subsequently converted to its current use as a funeral home.  By
the motion, the Debtor asks authority to sell the Chester Property
free and clear of liens, with liens to attach to proceeds and to be
paid at closing.  Although a plan has been confirmed, since the
case has not been closed the Village of Chester has requested the
entry of a comfort order approving the sale.

The Village of Chester has offered to purchase the Property for
$338,085, and the Debtor has accepted that offer, subject to the
approvals of the Court and mortgagee Orange Bank & Trust Co.
Orange Bank is the sole secured creditor of the Debtor.  The
contract has been extended by agreement to allow for the resolution
of title issues.

Orange Bank has agreed to release its liens and security interests
in and to the Chester Property in consideration of receiving the
net proceeds of sale at the gross sales price of $338,085, subject
to reasonable and customary closing costs.  The proposed purchase
is not subject to a financing contingency.  

The Debtor believes that the Village of Chester's offer is fair and
reasonable, and is in the best interest of the bankruptcy estate.
It asks authority to satisfy existing liens and encumbrances on the
Property, and all reasonable and customary costs associated with
the sale at closing, provided, however, that the Court approval
will be separately sought for the professional fees and expenses of
the broker and the Debtor's real estate attorney.

Bankruptcy Code Section 363(f)(2) permits a sale of the Property
free and clear of liens given that secured creditor Orange Bank &
Trust Company has consented to the sale.

A copy of the contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Ralston-Lippincott_111_Sales.pdf

A hearing on the Motion is set for Aug. 28, 2018 at 9:30 a.m.

The Purchaser:

          VILLAGE OF CHESTER
          47 Main St.
          Chester, NY 10918

           About Ralston-Lippincott-Hasbrouck-Ingrassia
                      Funeral Home, Inc.

Ralston-Lippincott-Hasbrouck-Ingrassia Funeral Home, Inc.,
Lippincott-Ingrassia Funeral Home, Inc., Lippincott Funeral Chapel,
Inc., and CKI, LLC, filed Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case Nos. 17-35114, 17-35115, 17-35116, and 17-35117, respectively)
on Jan. 26, 2017.  Anthony Ingrassia, president, signed the
petitions.

The Debtors are represented by Mike Pinsky, Esq., at Hayward,
Parker, O'Leary & Pinsky.  The cases are assigned to Judge Cecelia
G. Morris.  

Ralston-Lippincott-Hasbrouck-Ingrassia disclosed assets at
$1,280,000 and liabilities at $1,110,000, while
Lippincott-Ingrassia Funeral disclosed assets at $557,600 and
liabilities at $422,138.

Debtors Ralston-Lippincott-Hasbrouck-Ingrassia Funeral Home, Inc.,
Lippincott-Ingrassia Funeral Home, Inc., and Lippincott Funeral
Chapel, Inc., own and operate affiliated funeral homes in Orange
County, New York.

The funeral home owned and operated by
Ralston-Lippincott-Hasbrouck-Ingrassia Funeral Home, Inc., is
located at 72 West Main Street in Middletown, New York.

The funeral home owned and operated by Lippincott-Ingrassia Funeral
Home, Inc., is located at 92 Main Street in Chester, New York.

The funeral home owned and operated by Lippincott Funeral Chapel,
Inc., is located at 107 Murray Street in Goshen, New York.

Debtor CKI owns improved real estate located at 4 Oak Street,
Greenwood Lake, New York.  The Greenwood Lake Property is rented to
non-debtor affiliate Caitant, Inc., which operates that property as
an affiliated funeral home.

A joint plan of reorganization was confirmed on April 6, 2018.


RICHARD HOWARD: Wachira Buying Dallas Property for $700K
--------------------------------------------------------
Richard E. Howard and Joan B. Howard ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Georgia to authorize the sale of the
real property located at 878 Cole Creek Road, Dallas, Georgia to
George Wachira for $700,000.

Hamilton State Bank ("HSB") as assignee/successor-in-interest of
Highland Commercial Bank asserts a fist priority security interest
and lien in the Property arising from and in connection with that
certain (i) deed to secure debt dated Sept. 13, 2006 and recorded
with the Superior Court Clerk of Paulding County, deed book 2246
page 200; and (ii) deed to secure debt dated Sept. 13, 2006 and
recorded at deed book 2246 page 218.

The Property serves as collateral for three promissory notes due
and owing to HSB.  The notes are cross-collaterialized.  As of the
Petition Date, HSB asserted that the outstanding balance due and
owing from the Debtors totaled $1,330,202.  The Debtors and HSB
entered into an agreement regarding use of cash collateral and
adequate protection.  The Debtors have remitted adequate protection
payments to HSB during the pendency of the case.

The Debtors are not aware of any other lien holders.  

The Purchaser is willing to purchase the Property for the purchase
price of $700,000, free and clear of liens, claims, and
encumbrances.  The parties have executed a sales contract.  Any
sale of the Real Property by the Debtor will be on an "as is, where
is" basis and without representations or warranties of any kind,
nature, or description by the Debtor, its agents or anyone acting
on its behalf.

The Property was actively marketed by Metro and the offer
represents the highest and best offer received.  

The Debtors ask authorization to pay commissions and standard costs
related to closing at closing.  Commissions, in accordance with the
employment contract, will be 10% of the purchase price.  The
Debtors have also agreed to pay up to $10,000 in closing costs as
part of the parties' agreement.

Time is of the essence.  The Debtors ask that the Court waives any
rules and requirements that prevent a sale of any assets during the
initial filing of the case.  Without a sale, there will be no hope
of a successful reorganization.  They ask that the Court allows the
sale to be consummated immediately as authorized by Bankruptcy Rule
6004(g).

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

              
http://bankrupt.com/misc/Richard_Howard_101_Sales.pdf

Richard E. Howard and Joan B. Howard sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 17-67284) on Oct. 2, 2017.  The Debtors
tapped J. Nevin Smith, Esq., as counsel.  On Oct. 31, 2017, the
Court appointed Metro West Realty, LLC as broker.


RL ENTERPRISES: Amends Plan to Resolve Confirmation Objections
--------------------------------------------------------------
RL Enterprises, LLC, filed an amended plan of reorganization which
proposes to pay creditors from the continuing operations of the
Debtor's business.

The plan provides for 31 classes of secured claims, 1 class of
unsecured claims, and 1 class of equity security holders. Unsecured
creditors holding allowed claims will receive a distribution, which
the proponent of the plan has valued at approximately 0 cents on
the dollar.

HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as trustee for Deutsche Alt-A
Securities, Inc., Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-ARS, Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates; Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, as
servicing agent for The Bank of New York Mellon; Arnold L. Graff,
on behalf of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, solely as
trustee for Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust Mortgage Loan
Pass-Through Certificates; Arnold L. Graff, on behalf of U.S. Bank
N.A., as trustee for Presidential Asset Securities Corporation,
Home Equity Mortgage Asset-backed Pass-Through Certificates; and
Foothill Financial, LP, filed objections to confirmation of the
Plan.

A copy of the Amended Plan is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb17-10271-285.pdf

                     About RL Enterprises

RL Enterprises, LLC, is the owner of 10 investment properties.

RL Enterprises filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D.
Nev. Case No. 17-10271) on Jan. 23, 2017.  Roman Libonao,
president, signed the petition.  The Hon. Mike K. Nakagawa presides
over the case.  

The Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.

The Debtor is represented by Seth D. Ballstaedt, Esq., at
Ballstaedt Law Firm. The Debtor also hired Pettifer & Associates,
Inc., as appraiser.


ROCK CREEK MEDICAL: Taps Evans & Mullinix as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
Rock Creek Medical Plaza, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas (Kansas City) to hire
Colin N. Gotham, Thomas M. Mullinix, Joanne B. Stutz, and the firm
of Evans & Mullinix, P.A. as its counsel.

The services to be provided include providing the customary
services required in representing a Chapter 11
Debtor-in-Possession.

Evans & Mullinix hourly rates are:

     Colin N. Gotham        $325
     Thomas M. Mullinix     $325
     Joanne B. Stutz        $325
     Paralegals             $100

Evans & Mullinix, P.A., will also require reimbursement for its
out-of-pocket expenses.

Colin N. Gotham, member of Evans & Mullinix, P.A., attests that his
firm and its members are disinterested parties as defined in 11
U.S.C. Sec. 101(14), representing no interest adverse to the Debtor
or the Debtor's estate on the matters upon which they are to be
engaged.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Colin N. Gotham, Esq.
     Evans & Mullinix, P.A.
     7225 Renner Road, Suite 200
     Shawnee, KS 66217
     Phone: (913) 962-8700
     Fax : (913) 962-8701
     Email: Cgotham@emlawkc.com

                About Rock Creek Medical Plaza

Rock Creek Medical Plaza, LLC, owns and operates a medical office
building located at 712 First Terrace, Lansing, Kansas 66043.

Rock Creek Medical Plaza filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (Bankr. D.
Kan. Case No. 18-21755) on Aug. 23, 2018, estimating $1 million to
$10 million in assets and liabilities.

Colin N. Gotham at Evans & Mullinix, P.A., is the Debtor's counsel.


RUBY'S SOCAL DINERS: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Affiliated companies that have filed voluntary petitions seeking
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                       Case No.
     ------                                       --------
     Ruby's SoCal Diners, LLC (Lead Case)         18-13197
     4100 MacArthur Blvd Ste 310
     Newport Beach, CA 92660

     Ruby's Quality Diners, LLC                   18-13198
     Ruby's Huntington Beach, Ltd.                18-13199
     Ruby's Laguna Hills, Ltd.                    18-13200
     Ruby's Oceanside Ltd.                        18-13201
     Ruby's Palm Springs, Ltd.                    18-13202

Business Description: Ruby's -- https://www.rubys.com -- is a
                      restaurant chain that serves breakfast,
                      lunch, dinner, shakes and desserts.  The
                      Restaurant's menu includes Ruby rings, fried
                      calamari, fried green beans, Asian style
                      lettuce wraps, frings, chicken tenders,
                      fresh salads, home-style chili & soups,
                      burgers, sandwiches, tacos and more.  The
                      Company was founded by Doug Cavanaugh and
                      Ralph Kosmides in 1982.  Ruby's is
                      headquartered in Irvine, California, with
                      locations in California, Nevada, Arizona,
                      Texas, Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 29, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Santa Ana)

Judge: Hon. Catherine E. Bauer

Debtors' Counsel: William N. Lobel, Esq.
                  PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP
                  650 Town Center Drive, Suite 1500
                  Costa Mesa, CA 92626
                  Tel: (714) 384-4740
                  Fax: (714) 384-4741
                  Email: wlobel@pszjlaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Douglas S. Cavanaugh, authorized
signer.

Full-text copies of Ruby's SoCal Diners and Ruby's Quality's
petitions are available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-13197.pdf
         http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-13198.pdf

List of Ruby's SoCal's Three Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
Mission Valley                  Potential Liability      $500,000
Shoppingtown LLC                for breach of lease
Manager, Member, Agent
2049 Century Park East
41st Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
George B. Blackmar
Tel: (616) 238-8900
Email: gblackmar@bpslaw.net

Star-West Parkway Mall, LP          Trade Debt            $137,000
Email: dtoscano@poisinelli.cm

MGP Fund X Laguna Hills LLC         Potential              Unknown
                                   liability as
                                  guarantor of
                                 non-residential
                                 real property
                                  lease located
                                    at 24155
                                  Laguna Hills
                                   Mall, Suite
                                  184A, Laguna
                                   Hills, CA
                                     92653


SAN JUAN ICE: Ice Plant Repair Delays Plan Filing
-------------------------------------------------
San Juan Ice, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Puerto Rico to extend the exclusivity period during which only
the Debtor can file a plan of reorganization through and including
Oct. 31, 2018, from Sept. 27, 2018.

According to the Debtor, the reason for the extension is based on
the operation of the ice plant as a result of the passage of
Hurricane Maria and the repairs that must be done for the full
operation and increase in income to the debtor corporation.

To date, the Debtor is involved in the resolution of the insurance
claim relating to the repairs of the ice plant, in addition to the
execution of repairs.  The realization and finalization of repairs
will have a significant impact on the income of the debtor
corporation.  It is understood that the repairs in the process and
to be made will affect the final formulation of the Plan.
A copy of the Debtor's request is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb18-01784-58.pdf

                     About San Juan Ice, Inc.

San Juan Ice Inc., based in San Juan, PR, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 18-01784) on April 3, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Ramiro Rodriguez Pena, president, the Debtor
disclosed $580,495 in assets and $1.17 million in liabilities.  The
Hon. Mildred Caban Flores presides over the case.  Robert Millan,
Esq., at Millan Law Offices, serves as bankruptcy counsel.


SS&C TECHNOLOGIES: S&P Assigns 'BB' Rating on $875MM Term Loan B-5
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned a 'BB' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating to Windsor, Conn,-based SS&C Technologies Inc.'s
$875 million term loan B-5. The '3' recovery rating indicates S&P's
expectation of meaningful (50% to 70%; rounded estimate: 50%)
recovery in the event of default. All other debt ratings are
unchanged, at 'BB' and '3'.

The $75 million difference in the funded debt versus the $950
million cited in our previous report in Aug. 9, 2018, which S&P
expected to be an add-on to the TLB-3, was offset by cash on hand,
and causes no changes to our analysis. All other ratings are
unchanged.

  SS&C Technologies Inc.
  Corporate Credit Rating            BB/Negative

  New Rating
  SS&C Technologies Inc.
   Senior Secured   
   $875mil term loan B-5 due 2025    BB
   Recovery Rating                   3(50%)



STAR MOUNTAIN: Intends to File Amended Chapter 11 Plan by Nov. 30
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Star Mountain Resources, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Arizona to extend the exclusive period for filing
an amended plan of reorganization until the earliest of: (a) the
appointment of a Trustee; (b) the filing of a joint plan by the
Debtor and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors; or (3)
Nov. 30, 2018; and extend the deadline for obtaining acceptances to
the earlier of the date that is 60 days after the amended plan is
filed, or Jan. 29, 2019.

A hearing will be held on Sept. 5, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. during which
time the Court will consider extending the Debtor's Exclusivity
Periods.

The Debtor filed its Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure
Statement on June 21, 2018.  The Court heard various parties'
objections to the Debtor's Disclosure Statement and Plan on Aug. 1,
2018, and the Debtor agreed to file an amended plan and disclosure
statement to address those objections.  Although it could hurry to
amend the Plan and Disclosure Statement, subsequent events suggest
it would be more productive for the parties to first try to pursue
a path built on consensus rather than additional litigation.

The Court also heard evidence on the Committee's Trustee Motion on
Aug. 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7.  At the conclusion of the trial on the
Trustee Motion, the parties asked the Court to defer ruling so that
the parties could explore alternatives to the appointment of a
trustee that would allow for investigation of the transfer of the
Balmat Mining Assets to Titan Mining Corporation by an independent
party, and for payment of that investigation by the Debtor's D&O
insurance.  While these issues are being explored, the Debtor and
the Committee are also discussing whether consensus can be reached
on significant portions of a plan of reorganization.

Accordingly, the Debtor seeks an extension of approximately 150
days of the original deadlines under Section 1121(c):

     (a) to allow the Debtor to negotiate with the Committee and
the U.S. Trustee to resolve their concerns about the Titan Sale and
to explore the proposal of a joint plan with the Committee;

     (b) to conserve the Debtor's very limited liquid assets at
this stage of the proceedings, until it can be determined whether
consensus can be reached; and

     (c) continue discussions with the Securities and Exchange
Commission to attempt to address their concerns.

The Debtor believes that maintenance of the status quo through an
extension of the Debtor's exclusivity would best enable the parties
to explore a consensual resolution with the Committee and minimize
expenses during the next few months while these activities take
place.

Accordingly, the Debtor seeks exclusive authority to file an
amended plan until Nov. 30, 2018, which would give the parties
sufficient time to determine whether the D&O policy can be used to
pay for an independent investigation.  Since the policy expires in
mid-November, an extension to November 30 would give the Debtor
sufficient time to either file a unilateral plan, or file one with
the Committee thereafter.

                 About Star Mountain Resources

Star Mountain Resources Inc. --
http://www.starmountainresources.com/-- is a small cap mining
company focused on the acquisition of mineral properties and their
development into producing mines.  It is headquartered in Tempe,
Arizona.

Star Mountain Resources sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 18-01594) on Feb. 21,
2018.  In the petition signed by Mark Osterberg, president and
chief operating officer, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Daniel P. Collins
presides over the case.  Fennemore Craig, P.C., is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on April 18, 2018.  The Committee retained
Dickinson Wright, PLLC as its legal counsel.


STRUSS FARMS: Seeks Dec. 22 Exclusive Plan Filing Extension
-----------------------------------------------------------
Struss Farms LLC and Kevin W. Struss request the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Kansas for an extension of the exclusive
periods to file a reorganization plan and disclosure statements and
to solicit plan acceptance to Dec. 22, 2018.

The Debtors are presently in the process of reorganizing their
farming operations and is presently operating the farming
businesses pursuant to an Order for the Use of Cash Collateral.
However it is impossible to plan ahead for harvesting of crops and
to propose a viable plan of reorganization until the 2018 crop
results are known.

The Debtor has crop insurance payments pending for the 2017 and
2018 wheat crop and for the 2017 milo and corn crop due to the
severe drought conditions. The 2018 crops are expected to produce
good yields and Debtor believes that it is more likely than not
that the proposed plan will be confirmed as a 100% pay plan.

Accordingly, the Debtors request a 120 day extension pursuant to
permit the Debtor a realistic opportunity to propose a viable plan.
The Debtors believe that the Court will confirm a plan with an
extended allowance of the Exclusivity Period.

                      About Struss Farms

Struss Farms LLC, a corn producer in Wakeeney, Kansas, sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kan.
Case No. 18-10770) on April 26, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Kevin W. Struss, member/manager, the Debtor disclosed $9.57 million
in total assets and $8.78 million total debt.  The Debtor is
represented by Dan W. Forker, Jr., Esq., at Forker Suter LLC.  The
Hon. Dale L. Somers presides over the case.


TERVITA CORP: S&P Hikes Issuer Credit Rating to B+, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it raised its long-term issuer credit and
second-lien senior secured debt ratings on Calgary, Alta.-based
Tervita Corp. to 'B+' from 'B'. The recovery rating on the senior
secured debt is unchanged at '3', reflecting S&P's expectation of
meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate 60%) recovery under its
simulated default scenario.

At the same time, S&P Global Ratings removed the ratings on Tervita
from CreditWatch, where they were placed with positive implications
March 1. The outlook is stable.

S&P said, "The upgrade primarily reflects our view that Tervita's
business risk profile has strengthened following the completion of
the company's merger with Newalta Corp., with increased scale of
operations and leading market position as an energy-focused
environmental and waste solutions provider in Canada. We also
believe the business combination offers the company material cost
synergies and supports improvement in overall operating efficiency
and profitability through fixed-cost optimization. We also believe
Tervita's conservative capital spending plan reduces the risk of
debt increase through 2019 and keeps its financial risk profile
relatively stable for the 'B+' issuer credit rating. As well, we
expect the company will maintain adequate liquidity to manage its
ongoing operations while generating modest positive free cash flows
through 2019.

"Our improved business risk profile assessment on Tervita reflects
the meaningful increase in size and scale of the company's
operations and number of facilities in the Western Canadian
Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) following the merger. With more than 100
facilities evenly spread throughout the region, Tervita will be a
leading player, providing breadth of service offerings to a large,
diversified customer base in Canada. Despite the company's leading
market position in the country, we view Tervita as having limited
competitive advantage, with its services having limited
differentiation compared with that of other players in the market
and limited pricing power for the services it provides. Our
assessment also reflects the narrow scope of the company's
operations, and our expectation of continued EBITDA volatility
directly linked to the hydrocarbon price cycle."

The stable outlook reflects S&P Global Ratings' view that Tervita
will generate sufficient cash flow to maintain its fully adjusted
FFO-to-debt ratio above 12% and generate modest positive free cash
flows. Improved crude oil and natural gas drilling activity this
year, which we assume will continue under S&P's hydrocarbon price
assumptions, underpins our revenue and cash flow growth assumptions
for the company.

S&P said, "We would lower the ratings if Tervita's cash flow
generation materially underperforms our base-case scenario and its
fully adjusted FFO-to-debt ratio sustainably falls below 12%
without any prospects for improvement. Although unlikely in the
near term, aggressive financing of growth that increase leverage
without prospects for rapid deleveraging would also lead us to
revisit our ratings and outlook."

A positive rating action would depend on Tervita improving and
sustaining its average FFO-to-debt ratio above 20% while generating
positive free cash flows. In such a scenario, S&P would also expect
the company to maintain or increase its market share through the
existing service offerings and generate stable to improving
margins.



TITAN ENERGY: CEO Quits to Pursue Other Business Activities
-----------------------------------------------------------
Daniel C. Her has resigned his position as chief executive officer
of Titan Energy, LLC to pursue other business activities.  The
resignation was not the result of any dispute or disagreement with
the Company or any matter related to the Company's operations,
policies, practices, management or Board of Directors, according to
a Form 8-K filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.  Following his resignation, Mr. Herz will remain in his
position as a Class A director of the Company.

On Aug. 28, 2018, the Board appointed Jeffrey M. Slotterback, the
Company's current chief financial officer, as principal executive
officer.  Following his appointment, Mr. Slotterback will also
continue to serve as the Company's principal financial officer.

In addition, on Aug. 28, 2018, the Board approved the appointment
of Seth R. Bullock, a managing director of Alvarez & Marsal, LLC,
as the Company's chief restructuring officer.  Mr. Bullock's
services to the Company are billed by A&M, and he is not separately
compensated by the Company for serving as its chief restructuring
officer.  A&M is not an affiliate of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries.

Mr. Bullock, age 45, is a managing director with A&M and has been
with the firm since 2014.  Mr. Bullock brings over 20 years of
experience in the energy industry.  Prior to joining A&M, Mr.
Bullock worked with several restructuring and investment advisory
firms.  Mr. Bullock earned a bachelor's degree in finance from
Loyola University, New Orleans.

Following Mr. Bullock's appointment, he, along with Mr. Slotterback
and Christopher K. Walker, the Company's chief operating officer,
will each report directly to the Board.

                        About Titan Energy

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania-based Titan Energy, LLC --
http://www.titanenergyllc.com/-- is an independent developer and
producer of natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids (NGLs),
with operations in basins across the United States with a focus on
the horizontal development of resource potential from the Eagle
Ford Shale in South Texas.  The Company is a sponsor and manager of
Drilling Partnerships in which the Company co-invest, to finance a
portion of its natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids
production activities.

For the period from Sept. 1 through Dec. 31, 2016, Titan Energy
reported a net loss of $33.31 million.  For the period from Jan. 1,
2016, through Aug. 31, 2016, the Company reported a net loss of
$177.4 million.  As of Sept. 30, 2017, Titan Energy had $605.4
million in total assets, $605.5 million in total liabilities, and a
$61,000 total members' deficit.

Grant Thornton LLP, in Cleveland, Ohio, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the
Company does not have sufficient liquidity to repay all of its
current debt obligations.  The Company's business plan for 2017
contemplates asset sales, obtaining additional working capital, and
the refinancing or restructuring of its credit agreements to
long-term arrangements, or other modifications to its capital
structure.  The Company's ability to achieve the foregoing elements
of its business plan, which may be necessary to permit the
realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the
ordinary course of business, is uncertain and raises substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


TOMMIE LINGENFELTER: Wong Buying Macon Property for $45K
--------------------------------------------------------
Tommie J. Lingenfelter and Judith R. Lingenfelter ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Georgia to authorize
the sale of their interest in the real property located at 2986
Avondale Mill Road, Macon, Georgia to Patricia Wong for $45,000.

Respondent JPMCC 2002-CIBC4 Thomaston Retail, Limited Partnership,
is a Georgia Limited partnership whose principal address is c/o LNR
Partners, LLC, 1601 Washington Avenue, Suite 800, Miami Beach,
Florida.  Thomaston claims an interest in the Property by virtue of
a judgment dated Aug. 21, 2015, entered by the Superior Court of
Houston County, Georgia in the original amount of $1,494,160, and
recorded in the records of the Superior Court of Bibb County on
June 8, 2017 at Book 1165, Page 264.  The Debtors are asking to
avoid the Bibb County Judgment as a voidable preference in a
related Adversary Proceeding filed in the case.

On Sept. 22, 2017, the Debtors' filed the adversary proceeding
styled Tommie and Judith Lingenfelter v. JPMCC 2002-CIBC4 Thomaston
Retail, Limited Partnership, Case No. 17-05047, seeking a
determination of the extent, validity, and priority of the Bibb
County Judgment.  That Adversary Proceeding is currently pending.

Respondent Hon. Samuel Wade Mccord, Bibb County Tax Commissioner is
the duly elected and serving as Tax Commissioner of Bibb County,
Georgia.  He may be served at 188 Third Street, Macon, Georgia
31201.  He may claim an interest in the Property for ad valorem
taxes owing on the Property.

Respondent JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association is a national
banking association with its principal office located at 3415
Vision Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43219.  It may be served to its
bankruptcy service center at 700 Kansas Lane, Monroe, Louisiana
71203, or to its counsel of record McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce,
LLC, c/o Michelle Hart Ippoliti, 1544 Old Alabama Road, Roswell
Georgia 30076.  

The Motion is a Contested Matter under F.R.B.P. 9014.

On July 29, 2018, the Debtors as the Sellers, entered into a
certain Purchase and Sale Agreement with the Purchaser relating to
the purchase and sale of the Property.  In pertinent part, the
Contract provides that the Debtors shall sell the Property to the
Purchaser for a purchase price of $45,000, free and clear of liens,
claims, and interests.  The closing date is set for the later of
(i) Aug. 31, 2018 or (ii) Court approval of the sale.  

The brokerage fee, if any, due to Independent Realty of Central
Georgia, Inc., doing business as Washburn & Associates, is payable
out of the purchase price pursuant to an Exclusive Seller Listing
Agreement dated on Jan. 17,  2018, between the Debtors and the
Broker, and estimated to be $2,700.

The Debtors ask the Court to authorize disbursal of the proceeds of
the sale as follows: (i) i. pay liens for unpaid ad valorem taxes
assessed against the Property through the closing of the sale; (ii)
pay all usual, customary, and reasonable costs associated with the
sale as agreed in the Contract and the Listing Agreement; (iii) pay
to JP Morgan at closing the net proceeds necessary to satisfy the
JP Morgan indebtedness; (iv) pay to the Debtors' undersigned
attorneys at the closing the remaining proceeds, with all of such
remaining proceeds to be held by Debtors' undersigned attorneys in
escrow pending further order of the Court; (v) determine the value
of the Property being sold securing the liens; and (e) authorize
the compensation of Broker, real estate broker for the Debtors.

The Debtors believe that time is of the essence in closing the
transactions by the contemplated Closing Date.  Therefore, they ask
that the Court waives the 14-day stay of any order approving this
Motion pursuant to F.R.B.P. 6004(h) and 6006(d).

A copy of the Agreements attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Tommie_Lingenfelter_112_Sales.pdf

Tommie J. Lingenfelter and Judith R. Lingenfelter sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 17-51934) on Sept. 5, 2017.  

The Debtors tapped David L. Bury, Jr., Esq., at Stone & Baxter,
LLP, as counsel.  On Feb. 23, 2018, the Court appointed Independent
Realty of Central Georgia, Inc., doing business as Washburn &
Associates, as broker.


U REST: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------
Debtor: U Rest, LLC
           dba Ivey's Motor Lodge
           dba U Rest Inn
           dba O'Kelly's Irish Pub
           dba All That Grows
        241 North Road
        Houlton, ME 04730

Business Description: U Rest, LLC dba Ivey's Motor Lodge --
                      http://www.iveysmotorlodge.com-- owns a
                      lodging facility in Houlton, Maine.  Ivey's
                      offers 50 newly-designed smoke free guest
                      rooms and suites.  It offers all standard
                      amenities in all rooms, including Wifi, in-
                      room coffee maker, fridge, microwave and
                      flat screen TV's with DVD player.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 28, 2018

Case No.: 18-10504

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Maine (Bangor)

Judge: Hon. Peter G. Cary

Debtor's Counsel: Sam D. Anderson, Esq.       
                  BERNSTEIN, SHUR, SAWYER & NELSON, P.A.
                  100 Middle St.
                  PO Box 9729
                  Portland, ME 04104-5029
                  Tel: (207) 774-1200
                  Fax: (207) 774-1127
                  Email: sanderson@bernsteinshur.com

Total Assets as of August 24, 2018: $2,803,292

Total Liabilities as of August 24, 2018: $2,401,126

The petition was signed by Richard A. Kelley, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's three unsecured creditors is available for
free at:

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/meb18-10504.pdf


VER TECHNOLOGIES: Emerges from Chapter 11
-----------------------------------------
Equipment rental company VER Technologies Holdco, LLC, emerged from
chapter 11 under the terms of its Fourth Amended Plan of
Reorganization and AlixPartners, serving as the company's Chief
Restructuring Officer and Financial Advisors, has provided this
useful summary of the turnaround:

SNAPSHOT
========

     Financial Stats:          
     Amount of Secured Debt:      $734 million
     Amount of Unsecured Debt:     $27 million

     Total Assets:                $656 million
     Total Liabilities:           $875 million

     Total Sales-Operation:       $418 million
     Total Revenue:               $418 million


     AlixPartners Roles: Chief Restructuring Officer and
                         Financial Advisors to the Debtors

     Expertise:          Cash management, business plan
                         development, cash generation, debt
                         restructuring, contingency
                         planning, bankruptcy reporting,
                         merger integration

     Status:             Started:  January 2018
                         Completed: August 2018

     AlixPartners Engagement Principals:
         Larry Young (CRO) and Steve Spitzer
         both managing directors at AlixPartners
                                         
COMPANY BACKGROUND
==================

Vincent Dundee and Scott Dundee founded Full Throttle Films, the
predecessor to VER, in 1982.  The company grew through strategic
acquisitions and operational diversification into one of the
world's leading video rental companies.  VER's primary business
operations moved from film production and editing to providing
rental equipment across multiple product lines (audio visual,
cameras, lighting, etc.) to reality-TV productions, scripted TV and
feature films.

With more than 290,000 pieces of rental equipment in the US, Canada
and Europe, the debtors lease lighting, sound, rigging, and video
equipment to customers in the corporate, hotel, television, film
and live music sectors.  VER is headquartered in Glendale,
California.

As part of VER's expansion efforts, it rolled out more
service-oriented offerings instead of just focusing on renting out
equipment. The shift allowed the company to begin servicing live
events and concerts.

In late 2014, Catterton Partners took over the majority ownership
through a leveraged buyout, acquiring 92.9% of the common equity.
As part of the acquisition VER added a lot of debt to its capital
structure.

Despite expansions, VER's core business continued to be equipment
rentals.  In 2017, the global rental business accounted for about
US$386 million of its revenue, while the LED business accounted for
about US$33.1 million.

Following the Catterton acquisition, several challenges contributed
to tight liquidity.  As the debtors expanded into the full-service
market, relationships with key rental corporate customers took a
hit.  Some of the customers saw VER increasingly as a competitor,
which resulted in reduced rentals from them.

At the same time, organizational changes led to increased labor
costs. Between 2015 and 2016, the debtors' employee salary and
benefits obligations grew by US$28 million, largely due to new
hires in the products and operations teams. Corresponding growth in
the rental business was about US$10 million, less than half of the
increased workforce costs.

Additionally, VER purchased US$238 million in new rental equipment
between 2015 and 2016.  The new equipment was "disproportionally
underutilized" or purchased for segments that historically earned
lower returns, which drove negative cash flow and further increased
liquidity constraints.

In 2016, the debtors rolled out a new hub-and-spoke distribution
model, resulting in extensive rent increases and the build-out of
higher-end local technology centers ahead of sufficient demand.
The rollout also inadvertently resulted in an uptick of "no-charge"
orders totaling about US$3.4 million of missed revenue and damaged
certain client relationships.  During the expansion efforts in 2015
and 2016, VER also invested in new facilities that were
unexpectedly not supported by market demand.

In 2017, liquidity continued to tighten due to market headwinds.
Sale rumors impacted revenue, damaged employee morale and reduced
productivity. The uncertainty around a potential transaction led to
the loss of multimillion-dollar clients and key employees.

The ongoing issues were exacerbated by a depression in rental rates
of some of VER's most popular LED panels after a new Chinese
manufacturer flooded the market.  VER's liquidity was also impacted
by 2017 not having events like the Olympics or a big political
election, which left a US$2.4 million EBITDA gap for 2017.
Inclement weather was also a problem, such as Hurricane Harvey and
Hurricane Irma.  The storms' devastation impacted customers and led
to an estimated US$1.7 million shortfall in EBITDA.

In March 2017, VER retained Kirkland & Ellis to assist with a
strategic review of operations and capital structure. In January of
2018, the company retained AlixPartners to serve as its
restructuring advisor and PJT Partners as investment banker.

As of the chapter 11 petition date on April 5, 2018, VER had
US$760.8 million in outstanding funded debt, including a US$296.3
million ABL facility and US$424.2 million under a term loan
facility.

The company also owed US$14 million in first-out loans, US$18.75
million on an unsecured subordinated promissory note, and US$7.5
million in promissory notes provided by Catterton.

SCOPE OF PROBLEM
================

In late 2014, Catterton Partners took over the majority ownership
through a leveraged buyout, and currently holds 92.9% of the common
equity and drove a new expansion strategy:

     1. Aggressively shifted business model toward full-
        service (live music, direct to end-user broadcast,
        etc.)

     2. Made significant investments in labor and CapEx,
        which drove limited growth

     3. Damaged key relationships from pursuing full-
        service opportunities

     4. Rolled out new operating model, causing service
        failures and increasing fulfillment costs

     5. Sale rumors drove customer and staff attrition

This new strategy led to channel conflict with customers, growing
labor costs, operational dysfunction between local and national
functions, unnecessary capex and footprint growth, poor pricing and
data capture

These problems led to an unsustainable cost and capital structure
and an increasingly dire liquidity situation

DESCRIPTION OF ENGAGEMENT
=========================

Hired in January 2018, AlixPartners' Larry Young was appointed
Chief Restructuring Officer.

The AlixPartners team was immediately engaged to provide:

     1. Interim management duties

     2. Cash management and treasury support

     3. Business plan development
     
     4. Contingency planning and preparation of Schedules
        and Statements

Following the departure of the CEO, AlixPartners also took a
position in the interim "Office of the CEO" alongside senior
executives from VER.

During the pendency of the cases, AlixPartners was critical to
forecasting and maintaining sufficient liquidity, supporting the
resolution of business issues arising from the restructuring and
key personnel departures, managing the bankruptcy process, and
balancing operational and budget constraints imposed by the RSA,
the BOD and the DIP.

In addition, AlixPartners played a critical role in securing a
favorable settlement with the UCC, which enabled plan
confirmation.

AlixPartners supported the merger with strategic competitor PRG,
through integration support efforts (combined TRS/EI effort) across
all the functions of the business and the Integration Management
Office.

AlixPartners was engaged to provide the company with :

     * Interim management duties across the functions of
       the business

     * Business plan development
  
     * Contingency planning and preparation of Schedules
       and Statements

     * Evaluate and improve the current accounting controls

     * Implement improved cash management procedures

     * Facilitate the restructuring of the company's debt

OUTCOME & VALUE CREATED
=======================

Leadership Initiatives:

     * Established a company-wide focus on cash management
       to ensure liquidity during bankruptcy

     * Create a post-petition arms-length subrental
       arrangement between PRG and the Company to improve
       revenues.

     * Provided support in evaluating cost-reduction
       activities during the pendency of the chapter 11

     * Facilitated the integration with PRG (acquiring
       company)

     * Facilitated the prioritization of activities

Operational Initiatives:

     * Provided instruction related to fundamental cash
       management techniques

     * Provided analysis of the future state of the
       combined sales organization and the potential for
       cost reductions related to overlap of customers and
       revenues.

     * Provided a roadmap to address financial reporting
       and internal control weaknesses

     * Supported the merger integration process with PRG
       and their advisors

     * Provided support and guidance to management in
       meeting the business plan revenue numbers (overall
       for the months of the bankruptcy) despite:

       -- Not having the KEIP/KERP in place until May and
          the departure of certain senior sales personnel

       -- Departure of the CEO during the pendency of the
          bankruptcy

       -- Low morale among the sales staff

       -- Migration of customers to PRG following merger
          announcement

Financial Restructuring & Management:

     * Developed a cash flow forecast and financial
       business plan to support strategic planning and cash
       management

     * Successfully utilized cash flow forecast to advise
       and manage liquidity at Company and remained in
       compliance with covenants and restrictions placed by
       the $50 million of new-money post-petition DIP
       funding during the duration of the cases, despite
       changes to the plan including an elongated case and
       unplanned incremental closing liquidity requirements
       in excess of $4 million

     * Played critical role in securing a favorable
       settlement with the UCC with the improvement of
       recoveries to GUC from close to nothing to a
       material recovery

     * Worked with management to provide analysis and make
       decision to exit the unprofitable and capex-heavy
       LED install business

Bankruptcy Issues & Strategies:

     * Advised the company and lead bankruptcy preparation
       with counsel Kirkland & Ellis

     * Identified liquidity and address liquidity issues to
       ensure smooth functioning of the business throughout
       restructuring

     * Provided guidance to both company and PRG on
       contract rejection and negotiation leverage in
       amending facilities and other contract agreements

     * Coordinated with stakeholders to design KEIP/KERP
       program that kept a minimum number of the key
       management team in place

     * Coordinated with Kirkland & Ellis to manage
       compliance with the First-Day orders and keeping
       payments made on behalf of pre-petition amounts owed
       under the authorized limits

     * Successfully negotiated with critical vendors to
       ensure continuity of critical goods & services while
       minimizing payments made on behalf of pre-petition
       amounts.

     * Completed preparation of the SOFA and SOAL documents
       on an aggressive timeline.

     * Provided support in creating communications to
       vendors, customers employees and others related to
       the impact of the chapter 11 on the Company.

                    About VER Technologies

VER Technologies is a global provider of production equipment and
engineering support.  With the world's largest inventory of rental
equipment, VER supplies the most advanced technology to a broad
array of clients in the TV, cinema, live events, broadcast and
corporate markets.  Clients rely on VER's depth of experience in
Broadcast, Audio, Video, Lighting, LED, Cameras, Rigging, Media
Servers, Fiber and more.  With 35 offices across North America and
Europe, 24/7 support, and unparalleled expertise, VER can support
any live or taped production anywhere in the world.

VER Technologies, et al., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. Del. Case No. 18-10834) on April 5, 2018.

The Hon. Kevin Gross presides over the case.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Klehr Harrison Harvey
Branzburg LLP as their legal counsel; AlixPartners LLP as
restructuring advisor; PJT Partners as financial advisor; and
Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims and noticing agent.  

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, and Perella Weinberg
Partners serve as advisors to Bank of America Merrill Lynch.  FTI
Consulting and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP serve as advisors to GSO
Capital Partners.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors on April 12, 2018.  The Committee
tapped Whiteford Taylor & Preston LLC and Sulmeyerkupetz, a
Professional Corporation, as legal counsel.


WALLACE & GALE: Maryland Court Affirms Ruling Favoring Busch Couple
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The Court of Special Appeals of Maryland affirms the decision of
the circuit court in favor of appellee William Edward Busch, Jr.
and his wife Kathleen Busch in the case captioned WALLACE & GALE
ASBESTOS SETTLEMENT TRUST, v. WILLIAM EDWARD BUSCH, JR., ET UX, No.
1055, September Term, 2017 (Md. Spec. App.).

Following a 14-day trial, a jury returned a verdict in favor of
William Edward Busch, Jr., appellee, and his wife Kathleen. The
jury found that Busch suffered from mesothelioma caused by exposure
to asbestos-containing insulation products installed by Wallace &
Gale Co. during the construction of Loch Raven High School. Busch
worked as a steamfitter during the construction of LRHS. W&G was
the predecessor to Wallace and Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust,
appellant.

In their appeal, WGAST argues that the circuit court erred by
denying its motion for judgment on the basis that Busch failed to
present legally sufficient evidence to support a rational inference
of causation.

Based upon the evidence presented at trial, a reasonable jury could
have permissibly inferred that W&G was the primary, if not the
only, insulation contractor present during the construction of
LRHS, and, therefore, that W&G was responsible for the installation
of asbestos-containing insulation in the boiler room. The Court
holds that sufficient evidence was produced to support this
inference. The Court, therefore, holds that the circuit court did
not err by denying WGAST's motions for judgment.

In addition to arguing that the circuit court erred by denying its
motion for judgment, WGAST raises four issues relating to
evidentiary determinations and jury instructions.

At trial, WGAST admitted into evidence various documents relating
to the history of the current lawsuit as well as other asbestos
litigation, including the plaintiffs' short form Complaint filed on
April 11, 2016 and historical Baltimore City Asbestos Personal
Injury Master Complaints and Amendments by Interlineation. These
exhibits identified for the jury all of the defendants initially
named in Busch's initial Complaint, as well as all entities that
had gone bankrupt over the prior twenty-five years and could not be
named, and all parties who were thought by Busch to be responsible
for contributing to the development of his mesothelioma at various
stages of the litigation.

In response, Busch sought to admit the stipulation of dismissal for
McCormick. Busch argued that WGAST had implied to the jury that
Busch "sued all these people because there was exposure to Mr.
Busch from these defendants," and, particularly, to establish that
McCormick was present at LRHS. WGAST objected to the admission of
any evidence relating to McCormick's dismissal on various grounds,
including relevance.

In an attempt to cure the potential confusion, the trial court
permitted Busch to inform the jury that McCormick had been
dismissed as a defendant. It was a reasonable determination for the
trial court that WGAST, by informing the jury that McCormick had
been sued by Busch, had injected an issue into the case that had
the potential to confuse the jury as to McCormick's status. The
circuit court, therefore, did not abuse its discretion by
permitting Busch to inform the jury of McCormick's dismissal from
the lawsuit to alleviate the confusion created by WGAST.

WGAST further takes issue with the circuit court's admission of W&G
documents pertaining to times when Busch was not working at the
LRHS site, arguing that the admission of these documents was
erroneous and prejudicial. WGAST asserts that information
addressing times and places where Busch was not allegedly exposed
was irrelevant and could have confused or misled the jury.

Busch did not present direct evidence that he was exposed to
asbestos-containing insulation installed by W&G at LRHS. Rather,
this case involved circumstantial evidence to support an inference
that W&G was the primary, if not the only, insulation contractor
for the LRHS project, and, therefore, that W&G was likely to have
installed the asbestos-containing insulation in the boiler room. In
order to support this inference, Busch presented evidence of the
significant amount of work performed by W&G at the site. The extent
of the work performed by W&G at LRHS was a significant issue
presented at trial. During its opening statement, WGAST commented
that W&G did "some work" at LRHS, but maintained that this was a
case of mistaken identity in that McCormick was the insulation
contractor responsible for the insulation of the boilers.
Accordingly, the Courts hold that evidence relating to work done by
W&G at LRHS outside of the time frame that Busch worked at the site
was relevant, and the circuit court did not err or abuse its
discretion by admitting this evidence.

A copy of the Court's Decision dated August 10, 2018 is available
at https://bit.ly/2BRhpr3 from Leagle.com.

                   About Wallace & Gale

Established in 1881, Wallace & Gale, Incorporated was a
Baltimore-based insulation and roofing contractor that installed
asbestos-containing products for various companies, including
Bethlehem Steel and American Smelting & Refining Company.  On Nov.
16, 1985, W&G filed a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition.  On
April 17, 2001, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Maryland entered an order confirming the Fourth Amended Joint
Plan of Reorganization, creating the Wallace & Gale Settlement
Trust, an entity that assumed W&G's liabilities resulting from
asbestos claims.

On Nov. 2, 2010, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland approved the "Second Amended and Restated
Asbestos BI Claims Resolutions Procedures."  Section 5.4(b) of the
Procedures provided for the tolling of the statute of limitations
applicable to claims against the Trust.  Pursuant to Section
5.4(b), claims accruing after the petition date, Nov. 16, 1985, and
prior to the implementation date, Aug. 26, 2009, were required to
be brought against the Trust before: (1) the expiration of the
90-day period immediately following the date that the Claims
Materials were made publicly available to claimants, Sept. 28,
2010, or (2) the expiration of the statute of limitations
applicable to the claim, whichever was later.


[*] Discounted Tickets for 2018 Distressed Investing Conference!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Discounted tickets for Beard Group, Inc.'s Annual Distressed
Investing 2018 Conference are available if you register by August
31.  Your cost will be $695, a $200 savings.

Visit https://www.distressedinvestingconference.com/ for
registration details and information about this year's conference
agenda as well as highlights from past conferences.

Now on its 25th year, Beard Group's annual Distressed Investing
conference is the oldest and most established New York
restructuring conference.  The day-long program will be held
Monday, November 26, 2018, at The Harmonie Club, 4 E. 60th St. in
Midtown Manhattan.

For a quarter century, the focus of the conference has been on
"Maximizing Profits in the Distressed Debt Market."  The event also
serves as a forum for leaders in corporate restructuring, lending
and debt and equity investments to gather and discuss the latest
topics and trends in the distressed investing industry, as well as
exchange ideas about high-profile chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings
and out-of-court restructurings.  They are distinguished
professionals who place their resources and reputations at risk to
produce stellar results by preserving jobs, rebuilding broken
businesses, and efficiently redeploying underutilized assets in the
marketplace.

This year's conference will also feature:

     * A luncheon presentation of the Harvey K Miller Award to
       Edward I. Altman, Professor of Finance, Emeritus, New York
       University's Stern School of Business.  (The award will be
       presented by last year's winner billionaire Marc Lasry,
       Altman's  former student.)

     * Evening awards dinner recognizing the 12 Outstanding
       Restructuring Lawyers

To learn how you can be a sponsor and participate in shaping the
day-long program, contact:

           Bernard Tolliver at bernard@beardgroup.com
                  or Tel: (240) 629-3300 x-149

To learn about media sponsorship opportunities to bring your outlet
into the view of leaders in corporate restructuring, lending and
debt and equity investments, and to expand your network of news
sources, contact:

                Jeff Baxt at jeff@beardgroup.com
                   or (240) 629-3300, ext 150

Beard Group, Inc., publishes Turnarounds & Workouts, Troubled
Company Reporter, and Troubled Company Prospector.  Visit
http://bankrupt.com/freetrial/for a free trial subscription to one
or more of Beard Group's corporate restructuring publications.


[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings
-------------------------------------------------------
In re Shayan Shirin Lobat
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-19705
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 21, 2018
         represented by: Stella A. Havkin, Esq.
                         HAVKIN & SHRAGO
                         E-mail: stella@havkinandshrago.com

In re Land Dynamics, LLC
   Bankr. D. Idaho Case No. 18-40739
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 21, 2018
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/idb18-40739.pdf
         represented by: Matthew Todd Christensen, Esq.
                         ANGSTMAN JOHNSON, PLLC
                         E-mail: mtc@angstman.com

In re Choates General Contracting, Inc.
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-26699
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 21, 2018
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb18-26699.pdf
         represented by: Harrison Ross Byck, Esq.
                         KASURI BYCK, LLC
                         E-mail: lawfirm@kasuribyck.com

In re MAHDU, LLC
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-26717
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 21, 2018
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb18-26717.pdf
         represented by: Michael S. Kopelman, Esq.
                         KOPELMAN & KOPELMAN LLP
                         E-mail: kopelaw@kopelmannj.com

In re Charles Edward Lincoln, III
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-26726
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 21, 2018
         Filed Pro Se

In re Asimina Delengos
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-44795
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 21, 2018
         represented by: Peter Corey, Esq.
                         MACCO & STERN, LLP
                         E-mail: pcorey@maccosternlaw.com

In re Vincent Thomas
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-23271
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 21, 2018
         represented by: H. Bruce Bronson, Jr., Esq.
                         BRONSON LAW OFFICES, P.C.
                         E-mail: ecf@bronsonlaw.net

In re High Times Corp.
   Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 18-04770
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 21, 2018
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb18-04770.pdf
         represented by: Alexis A. Betancourt Vincenty, Esq.
                         LUGO MENDER GROUP LLC
                         E-mail: a_betancourt@lugomender.com

In re Charles Herbert Rosenberg, Jr.
   Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No. 18-40447
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 22, 2018
         represented by: Thomas B. Woodward, Esq.
                         E-mail: woodylaw@embarqmail.com

In re Mauro Cevenini
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-20201
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 22, 2018
         Filed Pro Se

In re Kantis Universal, LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-20240
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 22, 2018
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb18-20240.pdf
         represented by: Craig I. Kelley, Esq.
                         KELLEY & FULTON, PL
                         E-mail: craig@kelleylawoffice.com

In re Brookins Tractor Equipment and Repair, LLC
   Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 18-11035
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 22, 2018
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/gamb18-11035.pdf
         represented by: Kenneth W. Revell, Esq.
                         ZALKIN REVELL, PLLC
                         E-mail: krevell@zalkinrevell.com

In re Puttin On the Ritz, LLC
   Bankr. W.D. Mich. Case No. 18-03595
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 22, 2018
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/miwb18-03595.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Peak Hospitality Group, LLC
   Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 18-04180
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 22, 2018
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nceb18-04180.pdf
         represented by: Travis Sasser, Esq.
                         SASSER LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: travis@sasserbankruptcy.com

In re Glenmore Unique Homes LLC
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-44827
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 22, 2018
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb18-44827.pdf
         represented by: Andrew M. Tilem, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW M. TILEM
                         E-mail: andtile@aol.com

In re Offtech Of Maine, Inc.
   Bankr. D. Me. Case No. 18-20480
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 23, 2018
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/meb18-20480.pdf
         represented by: James F. Molleur, Esq.
                         MOLLEUR LAW OFFICE
                         E-mail: jim@molleurlaw.com

In re Regina Boston
   Bankr. W.D.N.C. Case No. 18-31285
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 23, 2018
         Filed Pro Se

In re Andres L. Gonzalez
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-26922
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 23, 2018
         represented by: Barry Scott Miller, Esq.
                         E-mail: bmiller@barrysmilleresq.com

In re Jackson Heights Early Learning Center, Inc.
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-44861
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 23, 2018
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb18-44861.pdf
         represented by: Daniel M O'Hara, Esq.
                         MCLOUGHLIN O'HARA, LLP
                         E-mail: dohara@mcloughlinohara.com

In re Ramon A. Rodriguez Cosme
   Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 18-04803
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 23, 2018
         represented by: Wanda I. Luna Martinez, Esq.
                         E-mail: quiebra@gmail.com

In re Ellen Martina Suleiman
   Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 18-13307
      Chapter 11 Petition filed August 23, 2018
         represented by: Justin I. Mishkin, Esq.
                         INTEGRITY LAW GROUP PLLC
                         E-mail: jmishkin@integritylawgroup.net


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2018.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***