/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/190405.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Friday, April 5, 2019, Vol. 23, No. 94

                            Headlines

1 GLOBAL CAPITAL: Seeks More Time to File Bankruptcy Plan
1 GLOBAL CAPITAL: Stampler Auction of Office Property Approved
ACHAOGEN INC: Reports $186.5 Million Net Loss for 2018
ADETONA LLC: Wells Fargo Objects to Disclosure Statement
AIR METHODS: Moody's Lowers CFR to Caa1, Outlook Stable

AMERICAN FORKLIFT: Exclusivity Period Extended Until April 19
APEX TOOL: S&P Lowers Issuer Credit Rating to 'B-'; Outlook Stable
BARRACUDA NETWORKS: Fitch Affirms 'B' LT IDR, Outlook Stable
BLACKBOARD INC: S&P Affirms 'CCC+' ICR on Transact Divestment
BLINK CHARGING: Incurs $3.42 Million Net Loss in 2018

BOURDOW CONTRACTING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
CABLE ONE: S&P Puts 'BB' Unsecured Debt Rating on Watch Negative
CAH ACQUISITION 12: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
CAMBRIDGE ACADEMY: Fitch Cuts $7.7MM Series 2010 Bonds to 'D'
CARTHAGE SPECIALTY: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended to May 24

CD MANAGEMENT: Credit Union Objects to Disclosure Statement
CHERRY BROS: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee
CITIZENS CONSERVATION: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
COUNTRY MORNING FARMS: U.S. Trustee Forms 2-Member Committee
DEQUEEN MEDICAL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

EASTMAN KODAK: Swings to 2018 Net Loss of $16 Million
EP ENERGY: Moody's Lowers CFR to Caa3, Outlook Negative
ERA GROUP: Moody's Alters Outlook on B3 CFR to Stable
EXPRESSWAY DELIVERIES: Exclusive Filing Period Moved to July 24
FIBRANT LLC: Has Until July 18 to Obtain Plan Acceptances

FORESTAR GROUP: Moody's Rates New $300MM Sr. Unsecured Notes 'B2'
G-III APPAREL: S&P Ups ICR to BB on Stronger Sales; Outlook Stable
GARRETT PROPERTIES: Sale of Three West Virginia Properties Denied
GARY FLEMING: $25K Sale of Mineral Rights to Pieria Approved
GAUCHO GROUP: Incurs $6.40 Million Net Loss in 2018

GK HOLDINGS: S&P Cuts Issuer Credit Rating to 'CCC'; Outlook Neg.
GLYECO INC: Incurs $5.31 Million Net Loss in 2018
GLYECO INC: Posts 2018 Net Revenue of $6.5 Million
HEXION INC: Moody's Cuts CFR to 'C' Amid Bankruptcy Filing
IOWA FINANCE: Fitch Rates $120MM Series 2019 Refunding Bonds 'B-'

JAMES LARRY BAIN: Proposed RE/MAX Auction of Arab Property Approved
JOSEPH BRENNICK: $460K Sale of Trust's York Property to Weston OK'd
JOSEPH BRENNICK: $65K Sale of Myakka Property to Swatsworth Okayed
JOSEPH BRENNICK: $70K Sale of Wauchula Property to Tenerife Okayed
LA STEEL SERVICES: Wants Confirmation Deadline Extended to June 21

LA STEEL: June 4 Plan Confirmation Hearing
LAKEVIEW VILLAGE: Fitch Affirms BB+ Rating on 2017A & 2018A Bonds
LIGHTFOOT FAMILY: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
LINDA THE BRA LADY: Simone Perele Objects to Disclosures, Plan
LK BENNETT USA: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

LNB-002-2013: Seeks to Extend Exclusive Filing Period to June 27
LONG BLOCKCHAIN: Subsidiary Secures C$450,000 in Loans
LOVEJOY'S FAMILY: Unsecured Creditors to Get $450K in 4 Payments
MAURICE SPORTING: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to May 20
MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL: Widens Net Loss to $678.8-Mil. in 2018

MR TORTILLA: DMFP Objects to Disclosure Statement
NATIONAL AUTO: Plan Solicitation Period Extended Until May 31
NATIONAL AUTO: Plan Solicitation Period Extended Until May 31
NGL ENERGY: Fitch Gives B/RR4 Rating to New Unsec. Notes Due 2026
NOWELL TREE: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended Until May 7

NSC WHOLESALE: Has Until May 22 to Exclusively File Chapter 11 Plan
OKLAHOMA PROCURE: Has Until July 15 to Exclusively File Plan
ONE BLUESKY: Case Summary & 9 Unsecured Creditors
OPTICAL HOLDINGS: Exclusive Filing Period Extended to May 24
ORGANIC POWER: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

PACKERS HOLDINGS: Fitch Alters Outlook on 'B-' LT IDR to Positive
PANAGIOTIS NASSIOS: $380K Sale of Holliston Property to Faria OK'd
PARIS MANAGEMENT: First Security Objects to Plan Confirmation
PEM FAMILY LIMITED: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
PHYLLIS HANEY: $167K Sale of Beaver Properties Denied w/o Prejudice

PINEY WOODS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
PRAGAT PURSHOTTAM: Substantial Consummation Date Moved to May 2024
PRESCRIPTION ADVISORY: Exclusive Filing Period Extended to July 11
REIGN SAPPHIRE: Incurs $2.6 Million Net Loss in 2018
ROBERT SIMMONS: Case Summary & 14 Unsecured Creditors

ROCK SPRINGS: Exclusive Filing Period Extended Until June 27
ROCK SPRINGS: Exclusive Filing Period Extended Until June 27
ROCKIES EXPRESS: Moody's Rates New $550MM Sr. Unsec. Notes 'Ba1'
ROSSER RESERVE: Town of Windermere Objects to Plan Confirmation
SOUTHCROSS ENERGY: Moody's Cuts PDR to D-PD Amid Bankruptcy Filing

SOUTHEASTERN GROCERS: Affiliate Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period
SPANISH BROADCASTING: Posts $16.5 Million Net Income in 2018
SUNCREST STONE: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended to May 9
SUNEX INTERNATIONAL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
SUNPLAY POOLS: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended to June 3

TOWERSTREAM CORP: Incurs $10.2 Million Net Loss in 2018
USA GYMNASTICS: Exclusive Filing Period Extended Until Aug. 5
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL: Adopts New Bonus and Retention Plans
WESTERN RESERVE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
WILSON MANIFOLDS: Seeks 21-Day Extension of Exclusivity Periods

Z GALLERIE: Seeks to Hire A&G Realty as Real Estate Consultant
Z GALLERIE: Seeks to Hire Stretto as Administrative Advisor
[*] S&P Withdraws Ratings on Four Issuers' Revenue Bonds
[^] BOOK REVIEW: GROUNDED: Destruction of Eastern Airlines

                            *********

1 GLOBAL CAPITAL: Seeks More Time to File Bankruptcy Plan
---------------------------------------------------------
1 Global Capital, LLC asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida to extend the period during which the
company and its affiliates have the exclusive right to file a
Chapter 11 plan through April 24, and to solicit acceptances for
the plan through June 26.

The companies' current exclusive filing period expired on March 24
while they can solicit acceptances for the plan until May 23.

The companies have already prepared a detailed plan term sheet and
intends to review it with the unsecured creditors' committee and
the Securities and Exchange Commission as soon as certain threshold
plan issues are resolved, according to their lawyer, John Dodd,
Esq., at Greenberg Traurig, LLP, in Miami, Florida.

In November last year, the companies entered into an agreement with
the SEC to resolve the claims asserted by the agency in its
complaint, which alleges unregistered securities fraud totaling
more than $287 million.  

On Feb. 21, the bankruptcy court approved a stipulation between the
companies and the Colorado Division of Securities to address
allegations that the companies are engaged in unlawful marketing
and sale of interests in loans used to fund cash advances to
merchants.  

                      About 1 Global Capital

1 Global Capital, LLC -- https://1stglobalcapital.com/ -- is a
direct small business funder offering an array of flexible funding
solutions, specializing in unsecured business funding and merchant
cash advances.

1 Global Capital LLC, based in Hallandale Beach, Florida, and its
debtor-affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Lead Case No. 18-19121) on July 27, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Steven A. Schwartz and Darice Lang, authorized signatories, 1st
Global Capital estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.  

The Hon. Raymond B. Ray oversees the cases.  

Greenberg Traurig LLP, led by Paul J. Keenan Jr., Esq., serves as
bankruptcy counsel; and Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC, as
claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Sept. 7, 2018.  The committee tapped
Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A. as its legal counsel;
Conway MacKenzie, Inc., as financial advisor, along with Dundon
Advisers, LLC, as co-financial advisor.


1 GLOBAL CAPITAL: Stampler Auction of Office Property Approved
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Raymond B. Ray of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida authorized 1 Global Capital, LLC (i) to sell
office furniture, business machines and electronics via auction;
and (ii) to dispose of any unsold Office Property.  

As adequate protection of the alleged interest of Collins Asset
Group, LLC in the Office Property, such interest will attach to the
Collins Reserve.

The 14-day stay under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) is waived.  The Order
will be effective immediately upon entry.

                      About 1 Global Capital

1 Global Capital, LLC -- https://1stglobalcapital.com/ -- is a
direct small business funder offering an array of flexible funding
solutions, specializing in unsecured business funding and merchant
cash advances.

1 Global Capital LLC, based in Hallandale Beach, FL, and its
debtor-affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Lead Case No. 18-19121) on July 27, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Steven A. Schwartz and Darice Lang, authorized signatories, 1st
Global Capital estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.  

The Hon. Raymond B. Ray oversees the cases.  

Greenberg Traurig LLP, led by Paul J. Keenan Jr., Esq., serves as
bankruptcy counsel; and Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC, as
claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 on Sept. 7, 2018, appointed seven
creditors to serve on an official committee of unsecured creditors.
The Committee tapped Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A. as
its legal counsel; Conway MacKenzie, Inc., as financial advisor
along with Dundon Advisers, LLC, as co-financial advisor.


ACHAOGEN INC: Reports $186.5 Million Net Loss for 2018
------------------------------------------------------
Achaogen, Inc. has filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K reporting a net loss of
$186.51 million on $8.72 million of total revenues for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $125.61 million on
$11.17 million of total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, Achaogen had $82.29 million in total assets,
$88.57 million in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $6.28 million.

Ernst & Young LLP, in Redwood City, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification in its report dated April 1, 2019, on the
Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec.
31, 2018, citing that the Company has incurred recurring losses
from operations and has stated that substantial doubt exists about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Achaogen said "Since our inception, we have financed our operations
with the proceeds from the underwritten public offerings of our
common stock, proceeds from sales of our common stock through the
use of our ATM equity offering programs, private placements of our
equity securities and certain debt-related financing arrangements.
In addition, we have historically received funding provided under
U.S. government contracts and non-profit foundations in connection
with the development of ZEMDRI and our product candidates.  We have
had difficulty raising sufficient funds to advance our
commercialization of ZEMDRI in the way we intended and our revenues
from sales of ZEMDRI to date have been very limited. For the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized $0.8 million in net
product revenue from sales of ZEMDRI."

At Dec 31, 2018, the Company had unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents of $31.0 million and restricted cash of approximately
of $25.5 million, for a total cash and cash equivalents of $56.5
million as of Dec. 31, 2018.

"Based on our available cash resources, which excludes restricted
cash (including the $25.0 million of restricted cash collateralized
in connection with the SVB Loan Agreement), we believe we have
sufficient cash to support current planned operations into June
2019.  This condition results in the assessment that there is
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern," the Company added.

The Company's report on Form 10-K is available from the SEC's
website at https://is.gd/Ho9htJ.

                     About Achaogen, Inc.

South San Francisco, California-based Achaogen, Inc. --
http://www.achaogen.com/-- is a biopharmaceutical company
committed to the discovery, development, and commercialization of
novel antibacterials to treat multi-drug resistant gram-negative
infections.  Achaogen's first commercial product is ZEMDRI, for the
treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections,
including pyelonephritis.  The Achaogen ZEMDRI program was funded
in part with federal funds from the Biomedical Advanced Research
and Development Authority (BARDA).  The Company is currently
developing C-Scape, an orally-administered
beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination, which is also
supported by BARDA. C-Scape is investigational, has not been
determined to be safe or efficacious, and has not been approved for
commercialization.


ADETONA LLC: Wells Fargo Objects to Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------------
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., objects to the Disclosure Statement
explaining Adetona LLC's Chapter 11 Plan.

The Creditor complains that the Debtor has failed to provide
financial projections that would support its ability to make the
proposed Plan payments. The Creditor further complains that the
Debtor has proposed making monthly payments to creditors in the
approximate amount of $13,400 immediately after confirmation.

According to the Creditor, the Plan will be funded from the future
operations of the Debtor. The Creditor asserts that the Debtor is
only a real estate holding company with no operations, its income
is dependent on its tenants, insider medical practices, timely
paying rent.

The Creditor further asserts that the Debtor improperly classifies
the claim of Wells Fargo as "unimpaired." The Creditor points out
that prior to the Petition Date, Wells Fargo's Note had been
accelerated and was due in full, in rough numbers, the Note, as
proposed in the Plan, will be paid off in 2040, which is after the
original maturity date of the Note.

Creditor asserts that the Debtor's sole source of income is the
collection of rent from insider medical practices. Creditor
complains that prior to the Petition Date and even after the
Petition Date, the tenants have failed to regularly make the
contractual $9,000 rental payments to the Debtor.

According to the Creditor that the Debtor has failed to provide
information about its true ability to fund a plan from any of cash
sources.

The Creditor points out that the Debtor's monthly post-petition
operating reports show an income range from $8,094 to $18,492.93.
Creditor further points out that each month is significantly less
than the collective $27,000 per month the Debtor's tenants are
contractually obligated to pay.

The Creditor complains that the Debtor is proposing to assume the
unexpired tenant leases and modify them by lowering the monthly
rent to $6,500 per month.  The Creditor asserts If the Debtor is
permitted to do this, its monthly income would be capped at $19,500
(which it has not achieved since the bankruptcy filing anyway).

According to the Creditor, the ultimate estimated recovery for
unsecured creditors is 35% of the allowed class 9 claims. Creditor
points out that unless the Debtor pays all senior classes of claims
in full, the equity holders cannot retain their interests and the
absolute priority rule has been violated.

Counsel to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.:

     Allen M. DeBard, Esq.
     LANGLEY & BANACK, INCORPORATED
     745 E. Mulberry, Suite 900
     San Antonio, Texas 78212
     Tel: (210) 736-6600
     Fax: (210) 735-6889

                       About Adetona, LLC

Adetona, LLC filed as a Single Asset Real Estate Debtor (as defined
in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Based in San Antonio, Texas, Adetona, LLC, filed a petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex.
Case No. 18-52099) on September 3, 2018.  The petition was signed
by Olutola Adetona, managing member.

The case is assigned to Judge Ronald B. King.  Martin Warren
Seidler, Esq. at the Law Offices of Martin Seidler represents the
Debtor as counsel.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimates $2,500,110 in assets
and $2,745,813 in liabilities.


AIR METHODS: Moody's Lowers CFR to Caa1, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Air Methods Corporation's
Corporate Family Rating to Caa1 from B3 and its Probability of
Default Rating to Caa1-PD from B3-PD. Moody's also downgraded the
first lien secured credit facility ratings to B3 from B2 and the
rating on the unsecured notes to Caa3 from Caa2. The outlook is
stable.

The downgrade reflects a material increase in the company's
leverage as a result of ongoing headwinds including declining
patient transport volumes, high fleet maintenance costs and
deterioration in payor mix leading to pressure on net revenue per
transport. Moody's believes reimbursement pressure will continue to
negatively impact Air Methods due to unfavorable mix shift from
commercial payors to Medicare and increasing scrutiny on surprise
medical bills that could lead to regulatory changes unfavorable to
the air ambulance industry. Moody's expects that the company's
adjusted leverage will remain above 8.0 times over the next 12
months.

The following ratings were downgraded:

Air Methods Corporation

Corporate Family Rating, to Caa1 from B3

Probability of Default Rating, to Caa1-PD from B3-PD

$125 million senior secured first lien revolving credit facility
expiring 2022, to B3 (LGD3) from B2 (LGD3)

$1.25 billion senior secured first lien term loan due 2024, to B3
(LGD3) from B2 (LGD3)

$500 million senior unsecured notes due 2025, to Caa3 (LGD5) from
Caa2 (LGD5)

Outlook action:

The rating outlook is stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Air Methods' Caa1 CFR reflects high financial leverage, operating
performance volatility caused by adverse weather conditions and
significant bad debt expense. Moody's expects the company to
operate with financial leverage of 8.0-9.0 times over the next
12-18 months. Moody's estimated leverage (including pro forma
run-rate cost savings initiatives, greenfield base contributions
and add-backs for non-recurring expenses) was approximately 8.3
times as of December 31, 2018. Excluding Moody's operating lease
adjustment, this figure would be 9.1 times.

Offsetting the above challenges, Air Methods' Caa1 CFR is supported
by a sizeable revenue base, positive cash flow, and the company's
position as a leading provider of community-based air ambulance
services in the United States. The company's initiatives to capture
new demand, manage recent negative press coverage, and reduce its
costs are likely to bear positive results. However, the timing and
magnitude of the full benefit of these initiatives is uncertain.

Despite weakness in operating performance, the company's liquidity
remains adequate. The company had $82 million of cash and a largely
unutilized $125 million revolver available as of December 31, 2018.
This gives the company adequate flexibility to manage its debt
service requirements (interest payments as well as mandatory first
lien loan amortization) as well as maintenance capital expenditures
over the next 12-18 months. Moody's expects limited growth capital
expenditures over the next 12-18 months. However, over time the
company's capital requirements will likely increase if it pursues
growth through expansion of its fleet.

The stable ratings outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the
company's strategic initiatives are likely to bear positive
results, although it will take several quarters for the benefits to
be reflected in financial performance.

The ratings could be downgraded if the company's operating
performance or liquidity weakens. An increased probability of a
default event (including a distressed exchange transaction) or
weakening credit recovery prospects would also result in a
downgrade.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

Air Methods is one of the largest providers of air medical
emergency services in the United States. In addition to the core
air medical emergency services business, the company also provides
aerial tours of the Grand Canyon, the Hawaiian Islands and Las
Vegas. The company also has a small presence in design,
manufacture, and installation of medical aircraft interiors for
domestic and international customers. The company is owned by
private equity firm, American Securities. Net revenues are around
$1.2 billion.


AMERICAN FORKLIFT: Exclusivity Period Extended Until April 19
-------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Cynthia Jackson extended through April 19 the
period during which only American Forklift Rental & Supply, LLC can
file a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization and disclosure statement.

The extension would give the company and Bank of Texas more time to
resolve various contested matters between them either by settlement
or trial.  The bank earlier filed a motion to lift the automatic
stay and an objection to the company's continued use of cash
collateral, which will be tackled at a hearing on April 11.

American Forklift is currently working on its proposed plan, which
it intends to file with the court after it resolves its issues with
Bank of Texas, according to a previous report by the Troubled
Company Reporter.

                    About American Forklift

American Forklift Rental & Supply, LLC --
https://www.americanforkliftrental.com/ -- specializes in forklift
rentals for the Central Florida area including Orlando, Tampa,
Lakeland, Orange County, Polk County, Lake County, and surrounding
areas.  It also offers new and used sales on a wide variety of
forklifts.

American Forklift sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 18-04155) on July 12,
2018. In the petition signed by Joseph Garcia, Jr., managing
member, the Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million
and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Cynthia C.
Jackson presides over the case.  Melissa A. Youngman, Esq., in
Altamonte Springs, Florida, is the Debtor's legal counsel.  No
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed.


APEX TOOL: S&P Lowers Issuer Credit Rating to 'B-'; Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings on April 2 lowered its issuer credit rating on
Apex Tool Group LLC to 'B-' from 'B'. The outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P lowered its issue-level rating on the
company's senior secured term credit facilities to 'B-' from 'B'.
The '3' recovery rating is unchanged. S&P also lowered its
issue-level rating on the company's senior unsecured notes to
'CCC+' from 'B-'. The '5' recovery rating is unchanged."

The downgrade to 'B-' reflects Sparks, Md.-based Apex Tool Group
LLC's inability to deleverage below 8x due to raw material cost
inflation, tariffs, and ongoing restructuring charges despite
revenue growth spurred by new products. Debt leverage has been in
excess of 8x for at least the past seven quarters and was 9x as of
Sept. 30, 2018. S&P expects the company's leverage will remain
above 8x for at least next 12 to 18 months until recent
restructuring expenses run off.

The stable rating outlook on Apex Tool Group LLC reflects elevated
debt leverage above 8x over the next 12 months, but with sufficient
interest coverage and cash flow to meet its obligations. S&P
expects to see higher volume growth with price improvement in 2019,
which should result in some year-over-year EBITDA growth. However,
S&P can continue to expect mild headwinds from cost inflation and
the potential of higher tariffs.

"We could lower the rating within the next 12 months if U.S.
commercial construction declined or input costs increased due to
further tariff impositions, resulting in low enough EBITDA that
Apex's debt leverage would exceed 10x and EBITDA interest coverage
will move closer to 1x. Under our assumptions, this would require a
deterioration in its EBITDA margin of over 200 basis points. We
could also lower the rating if the company's liquidity deteriorated
sufficiently or if it breached its credit agreement covenants,
losing access to its credit lines," S&P said.

"We could raise the rating within the next 12 months if the company
were able to reduce adjusted leverage metrics to well below 8x and
maintain interest coverage above 2x on a sustained basis. We would
need to see Apex improve margins by 200 bps driven by improved
market conditions and successful price increases while relieving
pressures driven primarily by inflation, negative manufacturing
variances, premium freight, and tariffs," the rating agency said.


BARRACUDA NETWORKS: Fitch Affirms 'B' LT IDR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Barracuda Networks, Inc.'s Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B'. The Rating Outlook is Stable.
Fitch has also downgraded the rating for Barracuda's $75 million
first-lien secured revolver and upsized $755 million first-lien
secured term loan to 'BB-'/'RR2' from 'BB'/'RR1'. In addition,
Fitch has withdrawn the rating on Barracuda's second-lien secured
term loan. The downgrade of Barracuda's first-lien term loan
reflects the lower recovery of the upsized loan. A full list of
rating actions follows at the end of this release.

On April 3, 2019, Barracuda announced a plan to upsize its 1st lien
term loan by $205 million. The proceeds will be used to repay the
existing $205 million 2nd lien term loan. The transaction is
leverage neutral. However, the recovery prospect for the upsized
1st lien term loan would decrease, resulting in the recovery rating
being downgraded to 'RR2' from 'RR1' and the 1st lien rating
downgraded to 'BB-' from 'BB'.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Product Range Supporting SMB Segment: Barracuda Networks, Inc.
offers products addressing a wide range of IT needs for small to
midsize business (SMB) customers that generally have limited
financial and technical resources dedicated to IT management. The
company's products include Next Generation Firewall, Web App
Firewall, Email Security Gateway, Web Security Gateway, Security
and Archiving for Office 365, and Backup/Data Protection. The
availability of these products through both appliance- and
cloud-based platforms enables its SMB customers to simplify IT
security and data-storage management. Fitch believes the breadth of
products available positions Barracuda well in a segment that
prefers simplicity to sophisticated solutions.

Secular Tailwind Supports Growth: Fitch believes two factors serve
as the fundamental demand drivers. The first is Barracuda's
cloud-based solutions, which allows the company to benefit from the
steady pace of IT workload migrating to the cloud from on-premise
infrastructure. The second is the increasing awareness of IT
security threats leading companies to allocate more resources to
protecting their networks and data. Some of the high-visibility IT
security breaches include data breaches and ransomware that could
be costly or cause damage to a company's reputation.

High Levels of Recurring Revenues and Revenue-Retention Rate:
Barracuda has been steadily transitioning toward subscription-based
revenue, which provides greater visibility into future revenue
streams. The proportion of subscription revenues has reached the
mid-80's, up from the 70's during FY2016. Barracuda maintained a
high subscription-revenue retention rate of over 100% in recent
periods, which demonstrates its ability to retain active
subscribers and upsell additional products. Fitch believes the high
levels of recurring revenues and retention rates provide a high
degree of revenue predictability.

Diversified Customer Base: Consistent with the fragmented nature of
the SMB segment, Barracuda serves a large set of over 150,000
customers. Fitch believes the diverse customer base could partially
mitigate inherent risks in the SMB segment through the economic
cycles.

Susceptible to Industry Cyclicality: Barracuda is susceptible to IT
security industry cycles, as illustrated by its fiscal 2017 and
2018 deceleration in revenue growth; however, the secular growth
trend helps moderate exposure to the security industry cycle. Fitch
believes the weakness may have been the result of strong growth in
previous years coinciding with heightened IT security awareness,
which has propelled overall industry growth. Fitch views the
current industry environment as normal and a more realistic base
for assessing future growth potential. Nevertheless, Barracuda's
focus on IT and data security will continue to expose the company
to industry cyclicality.

Leverage to Remain Elevated: Fitch expects gross leverage to be
near 6.3x in fiscal 2019, in line with peers in the 'B' rating
category. Fitch expects Barracuda to maintain gross leverage
between 5.5x and 6.5x throughout the rating horizon. During the
leveraged buyout, Thoma Bravo made an equity contribution of over
$500 million. Fitch believes this demonstrates Thoma Bravo's
commitment and confidence in the industry and the company.
Barracuda has a history of acquiring complementary technologies and
products, such as Sookasa and Sonian. Fitch believes the company
will remain acquisitive to keep pace with the fast-moving industry,
limiting its deleveraging primarily to EBITDA growth.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Fitch's ratings are supported by Barracuda's focus on IT and data
security for the SMB segment and the secular growth trend for the
IT security industry. The downgrade of the upsized 1st lien term
loan reflects the lower recovery prospect that results in a lower
recovery rating. Barracuda's products are primarily cloud-based,
making them easily accessible and manageable by SMB customers who
prefer simplicity to sophistication in IT security; having an over
150,000-customer base reflects this. The subscription nature of the
products and high revenue retention rates provide a high level of
predictability for its revenues. The predictability is marginally
tempered by the inherent risks of the SMB segment, which Barracuda
is exposed to through the economic cycles. At the IT security
industry level, Fitch believes the heightened awareness of IT
security risks arising from high profile security breaches in
recent years provides support for the secular growth of the
industry. Fitch expects Barracuda's leverage to remain in the 5.5x
to 6.5x range over the rating horizon. Barracuda's industry
expertise, revenue scale, and leverage profile are consistent with
the 'B' rating category.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  -- Revenue growth near 10%;

  -- EBITDA margins in the mid-to-high 20% range;

  -- Capex at approximately 2.2% of revenue, consistent with
historical trend;

  -- Acquisitions averaging $50 million per year for FY2020-2022,
enabling the company to expand product lines and technologies.

In estimating a distressed EV for Barracuda, Fitch assumes revenue
decline of 5% in a distressed scenario that also leads to
approximately three percentage points of margin compression on
lower scale, resulting in a going concern EBITDA that is
approximately 15% lower relative to Fitch's FY19 EBITDA estimates.
Fitch applies a 6.5x multiple to arrive at EV of $662 million. The
multiple is higher than the median TMT enterprise value multiple,
but is in line with other similar software companies that exhibit
strong FCF characteristics. In the 21st edition of Fitch's
Bankruptcy Enterprise Values and Creditor Recoveries case studies,
Fitch notes nine past reorganizations in the Technology sector with
recovery multiples ranging from 2.6x to 10.8x. Of these companies,
only three were in the Software sector: Allen Systems Group, Inc.;
Avaya, Inc.; and Aspect Software Parent, Inc., which received
recovery multiples of 8.4x, 8.1x and 5.5x, respectively.
Barracuda's operating profile is supportive of a recovery multiple
in the middle of this range.

Fitch assumes a fully drawn revolver in its recovery analysis.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments that May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- Expectation for gross leverage sustaining below 5.5x;

  -- Pre-dividend FCF margins sustaining above 10%;

  -- Organic revenue growth sustaining near or above 5%;

  -- FFO adjusted gross leverage sustained below 6.0x.

Developments that May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- Expectation for gross leverage sustaining above 7x,
potentially due to debt-financed acquisitions or dividend payment
to owners;

  -- Pre-dividend FCF margins sustaining below 5%;

  -- Organic revenue growth sustained near or below 0%;

  -- FFO adjusted gross leverage sustained above 7.5x.

LIQUIDITY

Solid Liquidity: Fitch expects the company's liquidity to remain
solid over the forecast period. Liquidity will be supported by
internal FCF generation, its $75 million RCF, and over $100 million
of readily available cash and cash equivalents. Barracuda's FCF is
supported by EBITDA margins in the mid- to high-20% range. Fitch
estimates FCF to be initially curbed in large part by restricted
stock unit payout, and FCF margins to gradually normalize in the
low teens and approach $70 million at the end of Fitch's forecast
period.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has taken the following rating actions:

Barracuda Networks, Inc.

  -- Long-Term IDR affirmed at 'B'; Stable Outlook;

  -- $75 million first lien secured revolver due 2023 downgraded to
'BB-'/'RR2' from 'BB'/'RR1';

  -- Upsized $755 million first lien term loan due 2025 downgraded
to 'BB-'/'RR2' from 'BB'/'RR1';

  -- Second lien term loan 'CCC+'/'RR6' rating withdrawn.


BLACKBOARD INC: S&P Affirms 'CCC+' ICR on Transact Divestment
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed the 'CCC+' issuer credit rating on U.S
education software provider Blackboard Inc. and issue-level ratings
of 'B-' and 'CCC-' on the company's first-lien debt and second-lien
notes, respectively.

Blackboard Inc. has entered into an agreement to sell its Transact
business segment to Reverence Capital Partners for over $700
million, to be completed in the second quarter of 2019. S&P expects
the company to use substantially all net proceeds to repay
first-lien debt.  While it expects the transaction to improve
near-term liquidity and covenant headroom, the rating agency said
that Blackboard's operational performance has been inconsistent
over the past few years despite the release of newer products.

The ratings affirmation reflects S&P's view of Blackboard's weak
projected cash flow prospects, inconsistent operational
performance, and a highly competitive landscape. Th rating agency
believes these factors and mature market conditions will challenge
prospects for sustained business improvement and jeopardize the
company's refinancing.

S&P said the negative outlook reflects the company's inconsistent
operational performance, continued high leverage, and weak FOCF
generation. The rating agency expects strong competition in
Blackboard's core LMS industry and slower-than-expected traction of
newer products to create uncertainty related to a significant and
sustained business turnaround. S&P thinks the lack of significant
business improvements over the coming year could jeopardize the
company's ability to refinance upcoming debt maturities.  

"We could lower our issuer credit rating on Blackboard if the
company does not sustain momentum in its business improvement and
revenue stabilization, or if its liquidity position deteriorates,
leading us to believe a debt restructuring is likely or its ability
to refinance diminishes," S&P said.

"We could revise our outlook to stable if the company makes
progress toward sustained revenue and business improvement and
better FOCF generation, leading us to believe the company's
refinancing prospects have improved and the company is able to
address upcoming debt maturities," the rating agency said.


BLINK CHARGING: Incurs $3.42 Million Net Loss in 2018
-----------------------------------------------------
Blink Charging Co. has filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K reporting a net loss of
$3.42 million on $2.68 million of total revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $75.36 million on $2.50
million of total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, Blink Charging had $21.65 million in total
assets, $5.55 million in total liabilities, and $16.09 million in
total stockholders' equity.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had a cash balance, net working
capital and an accumulated deficit of $18,417,513, $15,586,510 and
$159,856,481, respectively.

The Company believes its current cash on hand is sufficient to meet
its operating obligations and capital requirements for at least
twelve months from the issuance date of these financial statements.
Thereafter, the Company may need to raise further capital through
the sale of additional equity or debt securities or other debt
instruments to support its future operations.  The Company's
operating needs include the planned costs to operate its business,
including amounts required to fund working capital and capital
expenditures.  The Company's future capital requirements and the
adequacy of its available funds will depend on many factors,
including the Company's ability to successfully commercialize its
products and services, competing technological and market
developments, and the need to enter into collaborations with other
companies or acquire other companies or technologies to enhance or
complement its product and service offerings.

2018 and First Quarter 2019 Highlights:

   * Blink Charging's electric vehicle charging network had
     approximately 140,146 registered members as of Dec. 31, 2018
as
     compared to approximately 111,203 members at Dec. 31, 2017
     representing a 26% increase year over year in registered
     network members.

   * The Company's Dec. 31, 2018 balance sheet reflects $15.6
     million in working capital (defined as current assets less
     current liabilities) versus negative working capital of $34.8
     million at Dec. 31, 2017; an improvement of over $50 million
in
     working capital between 2017 and 2018.

   * Total liabilities were $5.6 million at Dec. 31, 2018 versus
     $38.8 million at Dec. 31, 2017; reflecting a decrease of $33.2

     million or an 86% reduction in total liabilities between 2017

     and 2018.

Michael D. Farkas, the Company's executive chairman and chief
executive officer stated "We ended 2018 with a strong balance sheet
and see an increasing world-wide focus on EV adoption and
infrastructure build-out.  We are ideally positioned to capitalize
on the expanding clean transportation opportunities during 2019 and
beyond with our Blink charging network and our newly introduced
Blink IQ200 Family of next generation Fast AC charging stations.
2018 was a year of rebuilding our business operations.  The vision
and mission that were established with the founding of Blink in
2008 is now reality as EV technology can now deliver the
performance transportation markets require. Our network, expertise
and increased footprint of network chargers have us very excited
about the coming years opportunities."

During the first quarter of 2019, Blink Charging:

  * Successfully completed its pilot program of the Blink IQ200
    family of next-generation, 80Amps, Level 2 Fast AC charging
    stations with dozens of units and more than six months of
    testing in every major region of the United States.  The Blink
    IQ200 is now in full production and commercially available to

    customers.

  * Entered into a memorandum of understanding with InterEnergy
    Systems, the technology focused wholly owned subsidiary of
    InterEnergy Group, to form a joint venture entity to develop
EV
    charging infrastructure throughout the Dominican Republic and
    Panama, with the objective of expanding the business to other
    Latin American and Caribbean markets in the near future.
Blink
    will provide the JV with its EV charging stations, the Blink
    Network and expertise, while InterEnergy will provide
    operational support, local resources and power sector expertise

    in the markets where the JV will operate.

  * Signed an agreement with the EUNICE ENERGY GROUP (EEG) to
    establish a joint venture, Blink Charging Europe Ltd., to
    leverage Blink's EV products, network, technology, and
    experience within the EV charging space alongside EEG's
position
    and financial abilities to expand the charging infrastructure
in
    Greece and other European countries.

As previously announced:

  * The Company teamed up with Google Maps during the third
quarter
    as they brought EV charging stations to its maps to assist EV
    drivers in locating our charging stations.

  * Blink Charging and Hubject (a joint venture formed by companies

    including BMW Group, Bosch, Daimler, EnBW, Innogy, Siemens and

    Volkswagen Group) announced a strategic relationship.  Blink
    Charging's nationwide network of chargers will be accessible to

    all EV drivers participating in Hubject's charging platform
and
    Blink Charging's network members will be able to easily access

    all charging stations on Hubject participating networks while
    driving in the United States.

The Company's report on Form 10-K is available from the SEC's
website at https://is.gd/ZKavdA.

                       About Blink Charging

Based in Miami Beach, Florida, Blink Charging Co. (OTC: CCGID),
formerly known as Car Charging Group, Inc. --
http://www.CarCharging.com/,http://www.BlinkNetwork.com/and
http://www.BlinkHQ.com/-- is a provider of public electric vehicle
(EV) charging equipment and services.  Blink Charging designs,
owns, operates and sells EV charging equipment under the Blink
brand, as well as a number of other charging station equipment
manufacturers such as Chargepoint, General Electric (GE) and
SemaConnect.  Blink Charging also offers connectivity to the Blink
Network, a cloud-based platform that operates, manages and tracks
Blink's EV charging stations and all associated data.


BOURDOW CONTRACTING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Bourdow Contracting, L.L.C.
        7080 Westside Saginaw Road
        Bay City, MI 48706

Business Description: Bourdow Contracting, L.L.C. is a
                      construction company based in Bay City,
                      Michigan.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 3, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Michigan (Bay City)

Case No.: 19-20683

Judge: Hon. Daniel S. Opperman

Debtor's Counsel: Susan M. Cook, Esq.
                  WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD, LLP
                  715 E. Main Street, Suite 110
                  Midland, MI 48640
                  Tel: 989-698-3700
                       989-698-3759
                  E-mail: smcook@wnj.com

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Jason A. Bourdow, managing member.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 13 unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb19-20683_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb19-20683.pdf


CABLE ONE: S&P Puts 'BB' Unsecured Debt Rating on Watch Negative
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed its 'BB' issue-level rating on U.S. cable
service provider Cable One Inc.'s senior unsecured debt on
CreditWatch with negative implications.

The CreditWatch negative placement follows Cable One's recent
announcement that it will acquire Sullivan, Mo.-based cable
operator Fidelity Communications Co. for $525 million. S&P believes
the all-cash transaction, which the company will fund with a
combination of cash on hand, revolver borrowings, and the proceeds
from new debt, could materially lower the recovery prospects for
Cable One's unsecured creditors depending on the type and amount of
debt it raises to finance the acquisition.

"We intend to resolve the CreditWatch placement in the coming
months as more information becomes available. The outcome will
depend on the type and amount of debt that the company issues to
finance the acquisition. Once more information becomes available
about Cable One's funding mix, we will update our recovery analysis
to incorporate the new outstanding secured and unsecured claims and
our enterprise value to reflect the benefits of the acquisition,"
S&P said.


CAH ACQUISITION 12: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: CAH Acquisition Company 12, LLC
          dba Fairfax Community Hospital
        40 Hospital Rd.
        Fairfax, OK 74637

Business Description: CAH Acquisition Company 12 is healthcare
                      services provider in Fairfax, Oklahoma,
                      offering a broad range of services including

                      emergency, radiology, laboratory, inpatient
                      care, rehabilitation services, respiratory
                      therapy, and swing bed.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa)

Case No.: 19-10641

Judge: Hon. Dana L. Rasure

Debtor's Counsel: Sam G. Bratton, II, Esq.
                  DOERNER, SAUNDERS, DANIEL & ANDERSON, L.L.P.
                  Two West Second Street, Suite 700
                  Tulsa, OK 74103-3117
                  Tel: 918 582-1211
                  Fax: 918-925-5215
                  Email: sbratton@dsda.com

Estimated Assets: $50,000 to $100,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Charles E. Cartwright, Trustee for
Receiver for Debtor.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/oknb19-10641.pdf

Pending bankruptcy cases filed by affiliates:

   Debtor                       Petition Date         Case No.
   ------                       -------------         --------
CAH Acquisition Company #1 LLC    2/19/19             19-00730
CAH Acquisition Company #2 LLC    3/17/19             19-01230
CAH Acquisition Company #3 LLC    3/14/19             19-01180
CAH Acquisition Company #4 LLC    3/17/19             19-01128
CAH Acquisition Company #5 LLC    3/13/19             19-10359
CAH Acquisition Company 11, LLC   3/08/19             19-22020
CAH Acquisition Company 12, LLC   3/17/19             19-01229
CAH Acquisition Company 6, LLC    3/21/19             19-01300
CAH Acquisition Company 7, LLC    3/21/19             19-01298
CAH Acquisition Company 7, LLC    3/21/19             19-11040
CAH Acquistion Company 16, LLC    3/17/19             19-12227


CAMBRIDGE ACADEMY: Fitch Cuts $7.7MM Series 2010 Bonds to 'D'
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded the rating on the following bonds
issued on behalf of the charter school, Cambridge Academy East, AZ
(CAE), by the Industrial Development Authority of Pima County, AZ
to 'D' from 'CCC'.

  -- $7.7 million education revenue bonds, series 2010.

SECURITY

The bonds are payable from a first-priority lien on all pledged
revenues of CAE, secured by a first mortgage on the financed
facilities and a cash-funded debt service reserve sized to
transaction maximum annual debt service (TMADS).

KEY RATING DRIVERS

PAYMENT DEFAULT: The downgrade to 'D' from 'CCC' reflects the
principal payment missed on April 1, 2019. The trustee reports that
pursuant to a direction from the majority holders of the bonds,
only interest payments are being made at this time. Amounts related
to principal are being retained in the trust estate and continue to
bear interest.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Rating sensitivities are no longer required given that the bonds
have defaulted.


CARTHAGE SPECIALTY: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended to May 24
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Margaret Cangilos-Ruiz of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of New York extended the periods during which
Carthage Specialty Paperboard, Inc. and Carthage Acquisition, LLC
have the exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan through May 24,
and to solicit acceptances for the plan through July 23.

The extension would give the companies more time to investigate
claims and finalize a bankruptcy plan.  The companies, which expect
to file a plan before May 24, had earlier sent a draft of their
plan to KeyBank National Association, the official committee of
unsecured creditors and the U.S. trustee, according to an earlier
report by The Troubled Company Reporter.

                About Carthage Specialty Paperboard

Carthage Specialty Paperboard, Inc. -- http://www.carthagespbd.com/
-- is a paperboard manufacturer in Carthage, New York, serving a
diverse range of markets from pulp-substitute specialty paperboard
to industrial grade chipboards.

Carthage Specialty Paperboard and its affiliate Carthage
Acquisition, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-30226) on Feb.
28, 2018.  In the petitions signed by Donald Schnackel, vice
president of finance, Carthage Specialty estimated assets and
liabilities of $10 million to $50 million; and Carthage Acquisition
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of
$10 million to $50 million.

The Debtors tapped Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC as their legal
counsel, and Bradley Woods & Co. Ltd., as their financial advisor
and investment banker.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors. The committee is represented by Lowenstein
Sandler LLP.




CD MANAGEMENT: Credit Union Objects to Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Evansville Teachers Federal Credit Union (the "Credit Union")
objects to the approval of the proposed Disclosure Statement
explaining the Chapter 11 Plan filed by the debtor CD Management,
LLC.

The Credit Union complains that the Proposed Disclosure Statement
is completely devoid of information regarding the value of the
Debtor's real property and any other assets or the current or
projected financial status of the Debtor. Credit Union points out
that the Plan proposes to pay the Credit Union's claim with low
monthly payments and a final balloon payment over an approximately
twenty-four (24) month period, but the Disclosure Statement fails
to provide financial projections for even a single month.

Credit Union asserts that the Disclosure Statement lacks
information as to the purported value of the real property.
According to Credit Union, this is crucial information, as it
determines the status of the Credit Union's claims as being fully
secured or under secured.

Credit Union further points outs that the Disclosure Statement
proposes entering into a new lease with a new tenant, assuming it
successfully evicts the current tenant. Credit Union further
complains that the Debtor provides a form of this proposed new
lease with the Disclosure statement but does not state whether or
not this is binding on the proposed lessee.

According to the Credit Union, the Debtor expects creditors with
allowed unsecured claims to be paid ten percent of their claim in
regular monthly payments over twenty-four (24) months, but there
are no projections to even hint as to how this could happen.

Credit Union asserts that the Proposed Disclosure Statement
contains absolutely no information about the current operations of
the Debtor or its business.

Credit Union complains that the Disclosure Statement does not
contain a liquidation analysis. Creditor points out that the Debtor
mischaracterizes the Credit Union's claim as unimpaired when it is
obvious that the Credit Union's claim is impaired.

According to Credit Union that the Debtor has no available income
to fund a plan, the Creditor has a properly perfected and valid
lien on the Debtor's real property and rents.

Creditor points out that the Debtor proposes to use the Credit
Union's collateral without proposing any interest rate. Creditor
further points out that the Debtor proposes paying the Credit Union
in an amount lower than it is currently receiving under its
Adequate Protection Order.

Credit Union assert that the Plan was not proposed in good faith,
violating 11 U.S.C Section 1129(a)(3), as evidenced by the lack of
disclosures, factual inaccuracies, and material omissions.

Counsel for Evansville Teachers Federal Credit Union:

     Matthew R. Lindblom, Esq.
     Sara A. Johnston, Esq.
     Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
     500 West Jefferson Street, Suite 2000
     Louisville, Kentucky 40202
     Telephone: (502) 333-6000
     Email: matthew.lindblom@skofirm.com
            sara.johnston@skofirm.com

                    About CD Management

CD Management, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 18-32078) on July 5,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $100,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge
Thomas H. Fulton presides over the case.


CHERRY BROS: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee
--------------------------------------------------
Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, on April 2 appointed
three creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of Cherry Bros. LLC and its
affiliates.

The committee members are:

     (1) Myco International, LLC
         6511 West Chester Road
         West Chester, OH 45609
         Attn: Kenneth Winnegrad, President
         Phone: (513) 644-0442
         Fax: (513) 777-4000  
         Email: kenw@importmyco.com
    
     (2) Steven Walnick Associates DBA Garfield Sales
         1943 Leslie Lane
         Mernick, NY 11566
         Attn: Steve Walnick, President
         Phone: (516) 868-2990
         Fax: (516) 8686488
         Email: garfieldsalesinc@gmail.com
   
     (3) Trophy Nut Company
         320 North 2nd Street
         Tipp City, OH 45371
         Attn: Robert Wilke, Vice-President
         Phone: (937) 545-1330
         Fax: (937) 667-4656
         Email: bwilke@trophynut.com

Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                      About Cherry Bros.

Cherry Bros., LLC is a privately held miscellaneous durable goods
merchant wholesaler.

Cherry Bros., LLC filed for bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.
Penn, Lead Case No. 19-11644) on March 18, 2019.  The petition was
signed by Larry Cherry, authorized representative.  Hon. Eric L.
Frank presides over the case.

The Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and
estimated debts of $10 million to $50 million.

The Debtor tapped Michael Jason Barrie, Esq. of Benesch,
Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP as its counsel.


CITIZENS CONSERVATION: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Citizens Conservation Corps Inc.
        198 George Street
        Beckley, WV 25801

Business Description: Citizens Conservation Corps Inc. is a local
                      nonprofit civic & social organization based
                      in Beckley, West Virginia.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 3, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of West Virginia (Beckley)

Case No.: 19-50058

Judge: Hon. Frank W. Volk

Debtor's Counsel: Joseph W. Caldwell, Esq.
                  Matthew M.Johnson, Esq.
                  CALDWELL & RIFFEE
                  3818 MacCorkle Ave. S.E. Suite 101
                  Post Office Box 4427
                  Charleston, WV 25364-4427
                  Tel: 304-925-2100
                  Fax: (304) 925-2193                     
                  E-mail: joecaldwell@frontier.com
                          chuckriffee@frontier.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Robert A. Martin, director.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/wvsb19-50058.pdf


COUNTRY MORNING FARMS: U.S. Trustee Forms 2-Member Committee
------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory Garvin, acting U.S. trustee for Region 18, on April 2
appointed two creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of X.

The committee members are:

     (1) Brian Andersen Farm, LLC  
         Denise Andersen, Manager  
         P.O. Box 584  
         Othello, WA 99344  
         (509) 750-9709

     (2) Christensen, Inc.  
         Jamilyne Fawver, Credit Manager  
         1060 Jadwin Ave.  
         Richland, WA 99352

Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                    About Country Morning Farms

Country Morning Farms, Inc., is a privately held company in the
cattle ranching and farming business.  Country Morning Farms grows
its own feeds, milk its own cows, and delivers fresh dairy products
to its customers.

Country Morning Farms filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.
Wash. Case No. 19-00478), on March 1, 2019.  The petition was
signed by Robert Gilbert, vice president.  At the time of filing,
the Debtor disclosed $6,421,269 in assets and $10,586,970 in
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Frederick P. Corbit.
The Debtor is represented by William L. Hames, Esq. at Hames,
Anderson, Whitlow & O'Leary.


DEQUEEN MEDICAL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: DeQueen Medical Center, Inc.
        13595 SW 134th St., Suite 210
        Miami, FL 33186

Business Description: DeQueen Medical Center --
                      http://www.dequeenmedicalcenter.com--
                      provides general medical and surgical care
                      for inpatient, outpatient, and emergency
                      room patients, and participates in the
                      Medicare and Medicaid programs.  Among the
                      services it provides are emergency care,
                      laboratory, nursing, radiology,
                      rehabilitation, and respiratory.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 3, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Florida (Miami)

Case No.: 19-14362

Judge: Hon. A. Jay Cristol

Debtor's Counsel: Paul Decailly, Esq.
                  DECAILLY LAW GROUP, PA
                  PO Box 490
                  Indian Rocks Beach, FL 33785
                  Tel: (727) 824-7709
                  Fax: (866) 906-5977
                  Email: pdecailly@dlg4me.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Jorge Perez, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-14362.pdf

Pending bankruptcy cases filed by affiliates:

     Debtor: CAH Acquisition Company #3, LLC
     District: North Carolina
     Date Filed: 03/14/2019
     Case Number: 19-01180

     Debtor: CAH Acquisition Company #4, LLC
     District: North Carolina
     Date Filed: 03/17/2019
     Case Number: 19-01228

     Debtor: CAH Acquisition Company #1, LLC
     District: North Carolina
     Date Filed: 02/19/2019
     Case Number: 19-00730
  
     Debtor: CAH Acquisition Company #5, LLC
     District: Kansas
     Date Filed: 03/13/2019
     Case Number: 19-10359

     Debtor: CAH Acquisition Company #11, LLC
     District: Tennessee
     Date Filed: 03/08/2019
     Case Number: 19-22020

     Debtor: CAH Acquisition Company #12, LLC
     District: North Carolina
     Date Filed: 03/17/2019
     Case Number: 19-01229

     Debtor: CAH Acquisition Company #16, LLC
     District: North Carolina
     Date Filed: 03/17/2019
     Case Number: 19-01227

     Debtor: CAH Acquisition Company #6, LLC
     District: North Carolina
     Date Filed: 03/21/2019
     Case Number: 19-01300

     Debtor: CAH Acquisition Company #7, LLC
     District: North Carolina
     Date Filed: 03/21/2019
     Case Number: 19-01298


EASTMAN KODAK: Swings to 2018 Net Loss of $16 Million
-----------------------------------------------------
Eastman Kodak Company has filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K reporting a net loss of
$16 million on $1.32 billion of total net revenues for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to net earnings of $94 million on
$1.38 billion of total net revenues for the year ended Dec. 31,
2017.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, Eastman Kodak had $1.51 billion in total
assets, $1.34 billion in total liabilities, $173 million in
redeemable, convertible Series A preferred stock, and a total
deficit of $3 million.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, in Rochester, New York, the Company's
auditor since at least 1924, issued a "going concern" qualification
in report dated April 1, 2019, on the Company's consolidated
financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that
the Company has debt maturing in 2019, operating losses and
negative cash flows that raise substantial doubt about its ability
to continue as a going concern.

Kodak has debt due in 2019 and is facing liquidity challenges due
to negative cash flow.  Based on forecasted cash flows, there are
uncertainties regarding Kodak's ability to meet commitments in the
U.S. as they come due.  Kodak's plans to improve cash flow include
reducing interest expense by decreasing the debt balance using
proceeds from asset sales, including the sale of the Flexographic
Packaging segment; further restructuring Kodak's cost structure;
and paring investment in new technology by eliminating, slowing,
and partnering with investors in product development programs.  The
divestiture of the Flexographic Packaging segment will negatively
impact segment earnings and cash flow.  Kodak is also exploring
options regarding additional liquidity from other sources.

"I look forward to working with my team to help Kodak become
cash-flow positive and build long-term value for shareholders,"
said Jim Continenza, Kodak's newly appointed executive chairman.
"Our priorities will be to increase operational efficiency and
focus on core competencies to achieve our growth objectives."

For the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, revenues decreased by
approximately $61 million compared with the same period in 2017.
Kodak ended the year with a cash balance of $246 million, down from
the Dec. 31, 2017 cash balance of $343 million.

"We generated cash in the fourth quarter of 2018 and delivered
strong performance in our key growth areas of SONORA Process Free
Plates and in PROSPER inkjet annuities," said David Bullwinkle,
Kodak's CFO.  "We expect to close soon on the sale of our
Flexographic Packaging Division and will use the proceeds to
significantly reduce our term debt and strengthen our balance
sheet. In addition, we plan to secure new financing for our
remaining term debt, which will allow us to focus on our operations
and return to consistent cash generation."

The Company's report on Form 10-K is available from the SEC's
website at https://is.gd/0Zg03v.

                     About Eastman Kodak

Eastman Kodak Company -- http://www.kodak.com/-- is a technology
company focused on imaging.  The Company provides -- directly and
through partnerships with other innovative companies -- hardware,
software, consumables and services to customers in graphic arts,
commercial print, publishing, packaging,electronic displays,
entertainment and commercial films, and consumer products markets.
Kodak is headquartered in Rochester, New York.


EP ENERGY: Moody's Lowers CFR to Caa3, Outlook Negative
-------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded the ratings of EP Energy LLC's
(EPE) Corporate Family Rating (CFR) to Caa3 from Caa1 and
Probability of Default Rating (PDR) to Caa3-PD/LD from Caa1-PD. The
rating on the secured 1-1/8 lien secured notes due 2026 was
downgraded to B3 from B1, the rating on the 1-1/4 lien secured
notes due November 29, 2024, was downgraded to Caa2 from B3 and the
ratings on the 1-1/2 lien secured notes, second lien secured term
loan and unsecured notes were downgraded to Ca. The Speculative
Grade Liquidity Rating was downgraded to SGL-4 from SGL-3. The
ratings outlook is negative.

Moody's considers EPE's purchases of notes during the fourth
quarter 2018 ($65 million par value) and first quarter 2019 ($50
million par value in January and February) at deep discounts to par
as a distressed exchange, which is an event of default under
Moody's definition of default. Moody's has appended the PDR with an
"/LD" designation indicating a limited default, which will be
removed after three business days.

"EP Energy's ratings downgrades reflect its worsening liquidity,"
stated James Wilkins. "The company has not generating positive free
cash flow and has $182 million of notes maturing in May 2020."

Downgrades:

Issuer: EP Energy LLC

Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to Caa3-PD /LD from
Caa1-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to Caa3 from Caa1

Senior Secured Second Lien Term Loan, Downgraded to Ca (LGD5) from
Caa2 (LGD5)

Senior Secured 1.125 Lien Notes, Downgraded to B3 (LGD2) from B1
(LGD2)

Senior Secured 1.25 Lien Notes, Downgraded to Caa2 (LGD3) from B3
(LGD3)

Senior Secured 1.5 Lien Notes, Downgraded to Ca (LGD4) from Caa2
(LGD4)

Senior Unsecured Notes, Downgraded to Ca (LGD6) from Caa3 (LGD6)

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Downgraded to SGL-4 from SGL-3

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: EP Energy LLC

Outlook, Changed To Negative From Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The downgrade of EP Energy's CFR to Caa3 reflects its weak
liquidity, need to repay $182 million of notes maturing in May 2020
and potential for continued negative free cash flow in 2019, if
production volumes remain flat. The company has high leverage with
$4.4 billion of balance sheet debt as of December 31, 2018, which
increased $345 million during 2018, to fund capital expenditures
and an acquisition. (Retained cash flow to debt was 10% for 2018
and debt to average daily production was more than $55,000,
reflecting the high leverage.) EPE's asset coverage (PV-10 value to
debt) is less than 1.0x, which is also indicative of high
leverage.

The company has guided that production volumes will fall to 72-73
mboe/d in the first quarter 2019, from 79.5 mboe/d in the fourth
quarter 2018, making it more difficult to support its high debt
load. EPE has not been able to maintain flat production while
generating break-even or positive free cash flow, which suggests
that it needs higher commodity prices to support its high leverage
and cost structure. EPE's production volumes fell after the first
quarter 2018, even as it spent $690 million on capital expenditures
in 2018 and generated -$279 million of negative free cash flow for
the year. Interest expense ($365 million in 2018) adds more than
$13 per boe to its cost structure. Any future debt financings will
likely command a higher yield than existing debt and refinancing
upcoming maturities could add to EPE's interest burden.

The SGL-4 Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, which reflects weak
liquidity, is driven by Moody's expectation that EP Energy will not
have sufficient funding to repay $182 million of notes maturing in
May 2020 as well as fund sufficient capital expenditures to
maintain flat production levels in 2019. EP Energy will not
generate positive free cash flow in 2019 while holding production
volumes flat, assuming a $60 per barrel WTI oil price. The company
keeps minimal cash balances ($27 million of unrestricted cash as of
December 31, 2018) and had $420 million of availability (as of
February 28, 2019) under its first lien revolving credit facility
due November 23, 2021. The revolver commitments total $629 million
and the borrowing base was set at $1.36 billion following the fall
2018 redetermination. The company's liquidity concerns have led it
to calculate its reserves based on a three year plan (instead of
the typical five year period). The RBL facility has two financial
covenants: (1) a maximum first lien net debt to EBITDAX ratio of
2.25x and (2) minimum current ratio of 1.0x, which Moody's expects
EPE will be able to comply with through 2019. EPE's alternative
sources of liquidity are limited, as a significant portion of its
assets are pledged as collateral for its secured revolver, term
loan and notes. It does have the ability to issue up to $371
million of additional secured debt, but the company already has
elevated leverage and a substantial interest expense burden.

The senior secured 1-1/8 lien notes due 2026 are rated B3 (three
notches above the CFR) reflecting their junior priority claim
relative to debt obligations under the first lien RBL credit
agreement and senior priority claim relative to other secured and
unsecured debt obligations in EP Energy's capital structure. The
senior secured 1-1/4 lien notes due 2024 are rated Caa2 (one notch
above the CFR). The roughly $2.1 billion of 1-1/2 lien notes are
rated Ca, one notch below the CFR, and have a higher priority claim
on assets relative to the second lien term loans (also rated Ca, $8
million as of December 31, 2018) and unsecured notes (rated Ca).

The rating outlook is negative, reflecting Moody's concerns over
the company's ability to repay or refinance the notes maturing in
May 2020 and fund ongoing operations. The ratings could be
downgraded if liquidity deteriorates. An upgrade could be
considered if the company's liquidity improves, production volumes
remain flat or resume growing, and debt is reduced such that EP
Energy has a sustainable capital structure.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Independent
Exploration and Production Industry published in May 2017.

EP Energy LLC, headquartered Houston, Texas, is an independent
exploration & production company with operations in the Permian,
Eagle Ford and Altamont basins.


ERA GROUP: Moody's Alters Outlook on B3 CFR to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service changed the rating outlook for Era Group
Inc. to stable from negative. Moody's also affirmed Era's B3
Corporate Family Rating (CFR), B3-PD Probability of Default Rating
and its Caa1 senior unsecured notes rating. Concurrently, Moody's
also affirmed Era's SGL-3 Speculative Grade Liquidity (SGL)
Rating.

"Era's stable outlook reflects improved leverage metrics following
additional debt reduction in 2018," said Amol Joshi, Moody's Vice
President -- Senior Credit Officer. "While there is continued
downside risk as the offshore market remains challenging, the
company's earnings look likely to stabilize at low levels in
2019."

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Era Group Inc.

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

Affirmations:

Issuer: Era Group Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B3-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Affirmed SGL-3

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3

Senior Unsecured Notes, Affirmed Caa1 (LGD5)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Era's B3 CFR is challenged by its small scale and heavy reliance of
its operations on activity levels in the Gulf of Mexico associated
with exploration and production (E&P) companies. In 2018, 69% of
Era's revenues were derived from operations in the Gulf of Mexico
and this concentration exposes the company to regional event risk
in the volatile offshore oil and gas industry. Era's debt-to-EBITDA
improved to below 4.5x in 2018 compared to an elevated level
exceeding 8x in 2017 (including Moody's standard adjustments).
Moody's expects leverage to be around 4.5x-5.0x through 2019 as
earnings remain roughly flat but with continued downside risk as
the offshore market remains weak. Era reduced its debt balances
while the company experienced only a slight growth in earnings in
2018. Era is supported by the company's sticky customer
relationships in the oil and gas industry and its track record of
operating profitably through commodity price cycles. While Era's
cash flow has deteriorated considerably from peak levels, the
company has significantly reduced its outstanding debt since
year-end 2014. In addition, Era owns all 108 helicopters in its
existing fleet, whose fair market value based on third party
appraisals provided good asset coverage for its debt balance at
December 31.

Era's senior unsecured notes are rated Caa1, one notch below the B3
CFR, reflecting the priority claim of its $125 million revolver to
the company's assets. The revolving credit facility is secured by a
portion of its US assets only.

Era's SGL-3 Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating reflects adequate
liquidity. At December 31, 2018, the company had a cash balance of
$51 million, and an undrawn $125 million revolver, with revolver
availability of $124.1 million net of issued letters of credit of
$0.9 million. In March 2019, Era in conjunction with its 50% joint
venture partner entered into an agreement to sell its Dart Holding
Company Ltd. joint venture for expected cash proceeds to the
company of approximately $40 million. The transaction is expected
to close in the second quarter of 2019, and should further boost
the company's cash position. The credit facility has a maximum
senior secured leverage ratio of 3.25x, a minimum interest coverage
ratio of 1.75x, and a minimum asset coverage ratio of 2x. Era was
in compliance with its debt covenants as of December 31, and
Moody's expects Era to remain in compliance into 2020. The credit
agreement also allows Era to include up to $20 million of proceeds
from asset sales for purposes of the senior secured leverage ratio
calculation, which are not included in Moody's EBITDA calculations.
In addition to trade-ins, Era periodically sells older aircraft and
uses the proceeds to purchase newer models. The periodic sale of
equipment provides an additional source of liquidity for the
company -- in 2018, Era raised about $30 million from asset sales
and disposals. A portion of Era's US-based fleet is pledged as
collateral for its revolving credit facility, but there is
over-collateralization that provides for backdoor liquidity.

The rating could be upgraded if the company sustains Debt-to-EBITDA
below 5x, annual EBITDA approaches $75 million in an improving
business environment, and the company conducts any newbuild program
at a measured pace, funding growth mostly with internal cash flow
and asset sales proceeds while maintaining adequate liquidity.

The rating could be downgraded if liquidity weakens, Debt-to-EBITDA
increases above 6x or Era's financial policy changes, such as using
significant amounts of debt to accelerate fleet upgrades or
shareholder payouts.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global Oilfield
Services Industry Rating Methodology published in May 2017.

Era operates a fleet of 108 helicopters that are used to provide
transportation services primarily to the offshore oil and gas
industry.



EXPRESSWAY DELIVERIES: Exclusive Filing Period Moved to July 24
---------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Julia Brand extended the period during which
Expressway Deliveries, Inc. has the exclusive right to file a
Chapter 11 plan through July 24, and to solicit acceptances for the
plan through Nov. 21.

Expressway Deliveries is contemplating a sale of substantially all
of its assets and needs the extension to finalize the valuation of
its assets, get court approval for bid procedures and conduct a
sale without the risk of other creditors filing a competing plan.
The company is also hopeful it will resolve the class action
lawsuits filed by its employees, which constitute the principal
dispute in its bankruptcy case, according to a previous report by
The Troubled Company Reported.  

                    About Expressway Deliveries

Expressway Deliveries, Inc., is a privately held company in Carson,
California, that operates in the couriers and express delivery
services industry.

Expressway Deliveries sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No. 18-23791) on Nov. 26,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $325,345 in
assets and $1,045,781 in liabilities.   

The case has been assigned to Judge Julia W. Brand.  The Debtor
tapped Friedman Law Group, P.C. as its legal counsel.



FIBRANT LLC: Has Until July 18 to Obtain Plan Acceptances
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Susan Barrett extended the period during which only Fibrant,
LLC and its affiliated debtors must obtain acceptances for their
Chapter 11 plan through July 18.

                       About Fibrant, LLC

Fibrant, LLC, headquartered in Augusta, Georgia, was previously a
producer and global supplier of chemical products and local
manufacturing services.  At the end of September 2017, the Debtors
completed the shutdown and decommissioning of their caprolactam
manufacturing facility located at an industrial site at 1408
Columbia Nitrogen Drive, Augusta, Georgia 30901, other than the
portion of the Facility that was (until recently) being used to
manufacture ammonium sulfate.  In late 2017, the Debtors ceased
production of ammonium sulfate at the Facility, and the Debtors are
now in the process of administering the sale of, and shipping, all
of the remaining ammonium sulfate inventory.  Once the inventory
has been sold and removed from the Site, the Debtors intend to
decommission the ammonium sulfate plant and all other operating
assets and plant infrastructure that was not previously
decommissioned.

Fibrant, LLC and affiliates Fibrant South Center, LLC, Evergreen
Nylon Recycling, LLC and Georgia Monomers Company, LLC sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Ga. Case Nos. 18-10274-77) on
Feb. 23, 2018.  The case is assigned to Judge Susan D. Barrett.
The cases are jointly administered.

The petitions were signed by David Leach, president and general
manager.

The Debtors tapped Paul K. Ferdinands, Esq., Jonathan W. Jordan,
Esq., Sarah L. Primrose, Esq., at King & Spalding LLP; and James C.
Overstreet Jr., Esq., at Klosinski Overstreet, LLP as counsel; and
Kurtzman Carson Consultants, LLC as their claims, noticing and
balloting agent.

The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities in the range of $10
million to $50 million.



FORESTAR GROUP: Moody's Rates New $300MM Sr. Unsecured Notes 'B2'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B2 rating to the proposed $300
million of senior unsecured notes due 2024 of Forestar Group Inc.
At the same time, Moody's affirmed Forestar's B2 Corporate Family
Rating ("CFR"), B2-PD Probability of Default, B2 rating on its
existing $119 million of senior convertible notes, and SGL-3
speculative grade liquidity rating. The outlook is stable.

Affirmations:

Issuer: Forestar Group Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B2

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B2-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Affirmed SGL-3

Senior Unsecured Conv./Exch. Bond/Debenture, Affirmed B2 (LGD4)

Assignments:

Issuer: Forestar Group Inc.

Gtd Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned B2 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Forestar Group Inc.

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B2 CFR reflects that land developers (Forestar's sole business)
frequently produce results that are discrete and transactional in
nature rather than recurring, which tend to make operating results
lumpy; the dismal financial performance of the overall land
development industry during the prior real estate downturn, wherein
virtually every land developer that Moody's rated ultimately went
bankrupt; the fact that gross margins, usually one of the better
metrics that land developers produce, will be constrained by
purchases of a major portion of Forestar's lots at a volume
discount going forward by 75%-owner, D.R. Horton, Inc. ("Horton"),
rated Baa3 stable; and the absence of any guarantees by Horton for
Forestar's debt.

At the same time, the B2 acknowledges the importance of Forestar to
Horton in helping the latter meet its enormous finished lot
requirements and the fact that Forestar is well-capitalized for a
land developer and will likely operate with a conservative capital
structure. Pro forma for the issuance of the $300 million of new
notes, Forestar's adjusted debt to capitalization becomes 38.5%. In
addition, the B2 rating considers that the Horton relationship will
permit Forestar to grow and scale up very rapidly, diversify its
own land holdings, tap into Horton's network of land sellers and
contractors, and learn and benefit from Horton's experience and
success. Also, Horton's demand for land is very strong, and even in
a downturn, Horton will still need many finished lots, orders for
which it can prioritize and funnel through Forestar so that the
latter's revenues do not dry up.

The stable outlook incorporates Moody's expectation that Forestar
will retain a conservative capital structure, adequate liquidity,
and rapid revenue growth once it scales up.

The ratings are unlikely to be upgraded in the near term without a
Horton parental guarantee. Longer term, an upgrade would be
considered if Forestar regains gross margin performance typical of
a land developer (35%+), generates interest coverage greater than
3.5x, maintains a sub 40% debt to capitalization, and reaches $1
billion of tangible net worth while maintaining good liquidity.

A downgrade could occur if Forestar began generating increasing net
losses, debt to capitalization exceeded 50% on a sustained basis,
interest coverage fell below 1x, and liquidity became impaired.

As of Forestar's trailing twelve months ended December 31, 2018,
the company's $154 million of unrestricted cash, an undrawn $380
million unsecured revolver due 2021, and comfortable cushion under
its revolver's financial maintenance covenants were balanced by its
large projected negative cash flow generation from its very large
projected lot purchase and development expenditures.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Homebuilding
And Property Development Industry published in January 2018.

Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Forestar Group Inc. is a publicly
traded land developer that is currently operating in 35 markets in
16 states. On October 5, 2017, it became 75%-owned by D.R. Horton,
Inc., the country's largest homebuilder by unit volume. Forestar's
revenues for the trailing twelve months ended December 31, 2018
were $116.8 million.


G-III APPAREL: S&P Ups ICR to BB on Stronger Sales; Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on New
York-based G-III Apparel Group Ltd. to 'BB' from 'BB-'.

At the same time, S&P raised its issue-level ratings on the
company's senior secured credit facility to 'BB+' from 'BB'. The
recovery rating on this debt remains '2'.

The upgrade reflects the company's improving credit metrics, with
forecasted leverage improving to the mid-to-high 1x area in the
next 12 months from the mid 2x area a year ago. S&P expects the
company's growth momentum to continue as its portfolio of brands,
anchored by Tommy Hilfiger, Karl Lagerfeld, DKNY, and Donna Karen,
continue to take share in the better department store channels.
Additionally, the company has integrated the DKI acquisition and
produced a successful first year collection. S&P expects the DKI
platform to boost profits and generate international opportunities
for G-III, as these brands are owned and not licensed.  

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that G-III will
continue to deliver growth in its wholesale segment, especially
with its top performing licensed brands, while expanding the scale
of its DKI business and executing on further rationalization of its
retail segment. As such, the rating agency projects leverage to be
less than 2x over the next 12 months, and would expect the company
to rapidly deleverage if it were to make any acquisition such that
resulting leverage was at or below 3x.

"We could lower our ratings on G-III if it undertakes a large
debt-funded acquisition such that leverage is sustained at more
than 3x. We estimate that debt would increase by more than $400
million for a transformational acquisition depending on the
incremental EBITDA from the transaction. We could also lower our
ratings if sales and margins are negative impacted by a slowdown in
U.S. consumer demand due to a weakening economy, key licensing
agreement changes, or a higher than expected tariff on Chinese
goods that results in debt leverage exceeding 3x. We estimate that
EBITDA would need to decline by 35% from current levels for this to
occur," S&P said.

"Raising the ratings in the next 12-24 months is unlikely because
we believe the company could make additional debt-funded
acquisitions to supplement its organic growth. We could upgrade the
company, however, if we become comfortable with G-III's financial
policy and believe that it will reduce leverage to less than 2x
within a year following any debt-financed acquisition. An upgrade
would also be predicated on the company continuing to grow in the
wholesale channel while expanding the profitability of its DKI
business, sustaining leverage at less than 2x, and generating
healthy free operating cash flow (FOCF)," S&P said.


GARRETT PROPERTIES: Sale of Three West Virginia Properties Denied
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Patrick M. Flatley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of West Virginia denied Garrett Properties, LLC's
sale of the following real properties (i) commonly described as
303A Top of the World Condominium, a condominium unit located
within Snowshoe Resort, in the Edray District of Pocahontas County,
West Virginia, to Joshua A. McGrath for $25,000; (ii) commonly
described as 913 Greendale Drive, Charleston, West Virginia, which
consists of a lot and an apartment building, for $55,000; and (ii)
commonly described as 1122 Edgewood Drive, Charleston, West
Virginia, which consists of a lot and an apartment building, for
$55,000; to Joshua A. McGrath, subject to overbid.

The Court is of the opinion that the properties proposed to be sold
by the Debtor are non-estate property under Section 541.

                    About Garrett Properties

Headquartered in Charleston, West Virginia, Garrett Properties,
LLC, is a limited liability company.  Since Aug. 17, 2004, Garrett
Properties has been in the business of owning, holding and renting
commercial and residential real estate.

Garrett Properties filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. S.D. W.V. Case No. 15-20085) on Feb. 24, 2015, estimating
its assets and liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million
each.  Judge Ronald G. Pearson oversees the case.  James M.
Pierson, Esq., at Pierson Legal Services, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.  On Sept. 14, 2015, the Court appointed Judy
Boggess as realtor.


GARY FLEMING: $25K Sale of Mineral Rights to Pieria Approved
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas P. Agressi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Pennsylvania authorized Gary L. Fleming, Sr.'s
sale of mineral and royalty rights related to property in Ritchie
County, West Virginia to Pieria Holdings, LLC for $25,000.

A hearing on the Motion was held on March 14, 2019.

The sale is free and divested of liens and claims, with such liens
and claims to be transferred to the proceeds of sale.

The following expenses/costs will immediately be paid at the time
of closing. Failure of the closing agent to timely make and forward
the disbursements required by the Order will subject the closing
agent to monetary sanctions, including among other things, a fine
or the imposition of damages, after notice and hearing, for failure
to comply with the above terms of the Order.  Except as to the
distribution specifically authorized in the Order, all remaining
funds shall, be held by Counsel for Movant pending further Order of
the Court after notice and hearing.

     (1) The 1iens(s)/claim(s) and amounts; No known liens;

     (2) Any normal and necessary taxes and closing costs related
to the sale of mineral rights;

     (3) The costs of local newspaper advertising 1n the amount of
$39.85, payable to Steidl & Steinberg, RC. 707 Grant Street, Gulf
Tower-Suite 2830, Pittsburgh, PA 15219,

     (4) The Court filing fee of $181 payable to Steidl &
Steinberg, P.C. 707 Grant Street, Gulf Tower-Suite 2830,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;

     (5) The Court approved attorney fees in the amount of $750
payable to Steidl & Steinberg; and

     (6) The balance of the funds realized from the within sale
will be held by the Attorney for the Movant until further Order of
Court, after notice and hearing.

Within seven days ofthe date of the Order, the Movant will serve a
copy of the within Order on each Respondent/Defendant (i.e., each
party against whom relief is sought) and its attorney of record, if
any, upon any attorney or party who answered the motion or appeared
at the hearing, the attorney of the Debtor, the Closing Agent, the
Purchaser, and the attorney for the Purchaser, if any, and file a
certificate of service.

The  Closing will occur within 90 days of the Order.

Within seven days following closing, the Movants/Plaintiffs shal
filed a Report of Sale which will include a copy of the HUD—1 or
other Settlement Statement.

The Sale Confirmation Order survives any dismissal or conversion of
the within case.

The bankruptcy case is In re Gary L. Fleming, Sr. (Bankr. W.D. Pa.
Case No. 19-20486).


GAUCHO GROUP: Incurs $6.40 Million Net Loss in 2018
---------------------------------------------------
Gaucho Group Holdings, Inc., formerly Algodon Group, Inc., has
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission its Annual Report
on Form 10-K reporting a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $6.40 million on $3.09 million of sales for the
year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $8.25 million on $1.81 million of sales for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, Gaucho Group had $5.64 million in total
assets, $6.71 million in total liabilities, $9.02 million in series
B convertible redeemable preferred stock, and a total stockholders'
deficiency of $10.09 million.

Marcum LLP, in New York, NY, the Company's auditor since 2013,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated April 1,
2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has a significant
working capital deficiency, has incurred significant losses and
needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain
its operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Gaucho Grouip said "Based upon our working capital situation as of
December 31, 2018, we require additional equity and/or debt
financing in order to sustain operations.

"During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we have relied
primarily on debt and equity offerings to third party independent,
accredited investors to sustain operations.  During the year ended
December 31, 2018, we received proceeds of approximately $3,508,000
from the issuance of convertible debt, approximately $580,000 of
proceeds from loans payable and approximately $1,324,000 proceeds
from the sale of our common stock.

"During the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued 775,931 shares
of Series B convertible preferred stock at $10.00 per share to
accredited investors in a private placement transaction for gross
proceeds of approximately $7,759,000, received proceeds of
$1,280,000 from the issuance of convertible debt (of which
$1,260,000 was subsequently converted to Series B convertible
preferred stock), and issued 22,500 shares of common stock at $2.00
per share to accredited investors in a private placement
transaction for net proceeds of $40,500.  We also received
approximately $519,000 of cash proceeds from a bank loan.

"The proceeds from these financing activities were used to fund our
existing operating deficits, expenditures associated with our real
estate development projects, enhanced marketing efforts to increase
revenues and the general working capital needs of the business.  We
will need to raise additional capital in order to meet our future
liquidity needs for operating expenses, capital expenditures for
the winery expansion and to further invest in our real estate
development.  If we are unable to obtain adequate funds on
reasonable terms, we may be required to significantly curtail or
discontinue operations."

The Company's report on Form 10-K is available from the SEC's
website at https://is.gd/SM4E7f.

                       About Gaucho Group

Headquartered in New York, NY, Gaucho Group Holdings, Inc. --
http://www.algodongroup.com/-- was incorporated on April 5, 1999.
Effective Oct. 1, 2018, the Company changed its name from Algodon
Wines & Luxury Development, Inc. to Algodon Group, Inc., and
effective March 11, 2019, the Company changed its name from Algodon
Group, Inc. to Gaucho Group Holdings, Inc.  Through its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, GGH invests in, develops and operates
real estate projects in Argentina.  GGH operates a hotel, golf and
tennis resort, vineyard and producing winery in addition to
developing residential lots located near the resort.  In 2016, GGH
formed a new subsidiary and in 2018, established an e-commerce
platform for the manufacture and sale of high-end fashion and
accessories.  The activities in Argentina are conducted through its
operating entities: InvestProperty Group, LLC, Algodon Global
Properties, LLC, The Algodon - Recoleta S.R.L, Algodon Properties
II S.R.L., and Algodon Wine Estates S.R.L. Algodon distributes its
wines in Europe through its United Kingdom entity, Algodon Europe,
LTD.


GK HOLDINGS: S&P Cuts Issuer Credit Rating to 'CCC'; Outlook Neg.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on U.S-based
information technology (IT) and business skills learning solutions
provider GK Holdings Inc. to 'CCC' from 'CCC+', its issue-level
ratings on the company's senior secured first-lien debt to 'CCC'
from 'CCC+', and its issue-level rating on the senior secured
second-lien term loan to 'CCC-' from 'CCC.'

GK Holdings Inc. (doing business as Global Knowledge) is set to
receive an equity infusion of EUR15 million from private equity
sponsor Rhone Capital LLC.  The company will use the proceeds to
pay its March 29, 2019, interest payment within the five-day grace
period and fund near-term operating needs. The company also amended
its credit agreement to extend its revolver maturity to December
2020 and amend its financial covenants to increase covenant
headroom.

"The downgrade reflects our expectation that weak operating trends
will persist over the next 12 months. Despite the equity infusion
and amendment to the credit agreement, Global Knowledge could face
another liquidity
event within the next 6-12 months. We expect the company to use the
EUR15 million (about $16.8 million) equity infusion to make its
March 29 interest payment within the five-day grace period (on or
before April 5), and to fund operating needs," S&P said.  "The
company's cash balances are limited, and the $20 million revolver
is almost fully drawn ($18.7 million outstanding as of Dec. 31,
2018), which underscores the company's need to generate sufficient
internal cash or receive additional cash from its sponsor to meet
its financial obligations."

Global Knowledge extended the maturity on its $20 million revolver
by one year to December 2020 and amended its maximum net leverage
ratio covenant to increase covenant headroom. The cushion under the
current 6.75x covenant was 5% as of Dec. 31, 2018, with covenant
stepdowns. This will be the company's third amendment to the credit
agreement to increase covenant headroom, and S&P believes it could
be difficult for the company to obtain additional amendments if
revenue and EBITDA continue to deteriorate. Furthermore, there is
increasing refinancing risk as the company's Dec. 30, 2020 revolver
maturity and the Jan. 20, 2021 $175 million first-lien term loan
maturity dates approach. The company's $50 million second-lien term
loan is due on Jan. 20, 2022. Its credit ratios are very weak. S&P
forecasts adjusted debt to EBITDA of about 11x and adjusted EBITDA
interest coverage of 1x in fiscal 2019 (ended Sept. 30) based on
S&P's criteria. S&P expects credit ratios to modestly improve in
fiscal 2020 but remain weak.  

Global Knowledge underperformed over the past several years because
of the evolving IT market and management's inability to transform
the business. S&P believes there is substantial execution risk for
the current management team to turn around North America business
well in advance of the company's debt maturities. As its customers'
preference shifted from traditional in-person classroom learning to
a broadening mix of virtual and online options, Global Knowledge
undertook significant restructuring to meet market demand. However,
it is unclear whether the company's growth initiatives, especially
in digital delivery, will significantly increase EBITDA growth,
which S&P believes is necessary to support its capital structure.
While lower year-over-year restructuring costs will improve EBITDA
growth during fiscal 2019, the rating agency believes that this
will be insufficient to support the capital structure.

The negative outlook reflects the potential for a lower rating on
Global Knowledge in coming quarters if its liquidity position
remains weak and S&P believes a payment default or a debt
restructuring could occur within the next 12 months.

S&P could lower the ratings if the company cannot secure its
proposed amendment, if it announces a distressed debt exchange or
debt restructuring in which lenders would receive less than par, or
in the event of a payment default or covenant breach.  

While highly unlikely in the near term, S&P could raise the rating
if the company successfully generates sustained positive growth and
if the rating agency does not view a liquidity event as a
significant near-term risk. This could occur if the company's
operating trends improve substantially, leading to sizable positive
cash flows or debt repayment, according to the rating agency.


GLYECO INC: Incurs $5.31 Million Net Loss in 2018
-------------------------------------------------
GlyeCo, Inc. has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Annual Report on Form 10-K reporting a net loss of $5.31
million on $6.45 million of net sales for the year ended Dec. 31,
2018, compared to a net loss of $5.18 million on $5.80 million of
net sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, GlyeCo had $9.85 million in total assets,
$10.62 million in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $770,553.

KMJ Corbin & Company LLP, in Costa Mesa, California, issued a
"going concern" qualification in its reported dated April 1, 2019
on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, stating that the Company has experienced
recurring losses from operations, has negative operating cash flows
during the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, has an accumulated deficit of
$47,310,534 as of Dec. 31, 2018 and is dependent on its ability to
raise capital.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

For the year ended Dec. 31, 2018 and 2017, net cash used in
operating activities from continuing operations was $1,073,960 and
$2,068,835, respectively.  The decrease in cash used in operating
activities is due to the significant period over period changes in
accounts receivables, inventories and accounts payable and accrued
expenses.

For the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, the Company used $128,433 in cash
for investing activities from continued operations compared to the
$716,787 used in the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  These amounts were
comprised primarily of capital expenditures for equipment.

For the years ended Dec. 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company received
$1,395,786 and $1,121,539, respectively, in cash from financing
activities.  The amount of cash received in 2018 is primarily
comprised of proceeds from the 10% unsecured notes.  The amount of
cash received in 2017 is primarily comprised of proceeds from the
exercise of warrants and proceeds from a sale-leaseback, partially
offset by the repayment of debt, including the 5% Notes, as well as
proceeds from the Company's August 2017 rights offering.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had $828,946 in current assets,
consisting primarily of $237,648 in cash, $215,336 in accounts
receivable and $238,895 in inventory.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had total current liabilities of
$6,509,831, consisting primarily of accounts payable and accrued
expenses of $2,845,856.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had total
non-current liabilities of $3,533,736, consisting primarily of the
non-current portion of its notes payable and capital lease
obligations.

The Company's report on Form 10-K is available from the SEC's
website at https://is.gd/7aVURi.

                       About GlyEco, Inc.

GlyEco, Inc. -- http://www.glyeco.com/-- is a developer,
manufacturer and distributor of performance fluids for the
automotive, commercial and industrial markets.  The Company
specializes in coolants, additives and complementary fluids.  The
Company's network of facilities, develop, manufacture and
distribute products including a wide spectrum of ready to use
anti-freezes and additive packages for the antifreeze/coolant, gas
patch coolants and heat transfer fluid industries, throughout
North
America.  The Company is headquartered Institute, West Virginia.


GLYECO INC: Posts 2018 Net Revenue of $6.5 Million
--------------------------------------------------
GlyEco, Inc. reported the following financial results for the full
year ended Dec. 31, 2018.  The Company completed the sale of its
assets related to its consumer segment effective Jan. 11, 2019.

Full Year 2018 Highlights

   * Net revenues of $6.5 million were up 11% compared to $5.8
     million for full-year 2017.

   * Total gross profit was $1,285,000, or 20% of revenues,
compared
     to $885,000, or 15% of revenues, for 2017.

   * Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, was $(1,565,000) compared

     to $(2,331,000) for 2017.

2018 Financial Review

The Company reported total revenues increased by $650,000 or 11%,
from $5,807,000 for full-year 2017 to $6,457,000 for full-year
2018. Sales growth was driven by increasing capacity utilization at
the WV ethylene glycol plant which grew net revenues by $401,000 or
11% YoY and by the WEBA division which grew sales of chemical
additives by $249,000 or 11% YoY.  Total sales of $3,929,000 at the
WV facility for 2018 included $59,000 in sales of finished
anti-freeze from the newly-operational blending facility.  This
facility came online in October 2018 and with be a primary engine
for sales growth, along with the ethylene-glycol plant and the WEBA
operation, going forward.

The Company reported total gross profit increased from $885,000,
representing a 15% gross margin, in 2017 to $1,285,000,
representing a 20% gross margin, in 2018.  The increase in gross
margin was driven by scaling operations at the WV plant through
increased production and sales volumes.  The facility remains well
below its operational capacity with fixed costs comprising a large
portion of overall production costs.  The Company expects fixed
costs per unit to reduce significantly as it increases production
throughout 2019.

The Company reported operating expenses decreased from $5,155,000
to $3,946,000, for 2018.  The Company expects to significantly
reduce operating expenses throughout 2019 to better match the level
of corporate overhead with the remaining business operations.

The Company reported a net loss from continuing operations of
$3,452,000 for 2018, compared to a net loss from continuing
operations of $5,078,000 for 2017.

The Company reported adjusted EBITDA of $(1,565,000) in 2018,
compared to $(2,331,000) for 2017.  Both figures reflect only
continuing operations entering 2019.

Business Update

The Company executed the sale of its consumer segment assets
effective Jan. 11, 2019.  In doing so, the Company exited the
business of retail distribution of antifreeze via route delivery
trucks.  This divestment will allow the company to focus on the
remaining business units including the ethylene glycol plant in WV,
the finished-fluids blending facility and the WEBA additive
operation.  The resulting company is designed around true
vertical-integration with the ability to meet the full needs of a
large-scale, industrial customer. Going forward, the company will
report as a single segment with two highly-integrated subdivisions;
Commodity Chemicals and Finished Performance Fluids.  In addition
to external customer sales, the WV glycol plant and WEBA additives
subsidiary will supply the blending facility with raw materials to
create more-profitable, downstream finished fluids.  The new
blending facility provides the Company with capacity to blend up to
6 million gallons of finished antifreeze per year to meet the needs
of large customers.

"The sale of the consumer segment assets marks the completion of a
strategic shift for our company that was over a year in the making.
Our focus moving forward is on maximizing the value of our
production assets, including the West Virginia glycol plant, WEBA
additive business and new high-capacity blending facility.  The new
company structure allows us to offer a full range of glycol-based
products on an industrial scale which will facilitate large
strategic partnerships in the weeks and months to come," said Mr.
Geib, president and chief executive officer.

A full-text copy of the press release is available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/D4QidP

                     About GlyEco, Inc.

GlyEco, Inc. -- http://www.glyeco.com/-- is a developer,
manufacturer and distributor of performance fluids for the
automotive, commercial and industrial markets.  The Company
specializes in coolants, additives and complementary fluids.  The
Company's network of facilities, develop, manufacture and
distribute products including a wide spectrum of ready to use
anti-freezes and additive packages for the antifreeze/coolant, gas
patch coolants and heat transfer fluid industries, throughout North
America.  The Company is headquartered Institute, West Virginia.

GlyeCo incurred a net loss of $5.31 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $5.18 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, GlyeCo had $9.85 million
in total assets, $10.62 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders’ deficit of $770,553.

KMJ Corbin & Company LLP, in Costa Mesa, California, issued a
"going concern" qualification in its reported dated April 1, 2019
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, stating that the Company has experienced
recurring losses from operations, has negative operating cash flows
during the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, has an accumulated deficit of
$47,310,534 as of Dec. 31, 2018 and is dependent on its ability to
raise capital. These factors raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


HEXION INC: Moody's Cuts CFR to 'C' Amid Bankruptcy Filing
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded the ratings of Hexion Inc.,
(Corporate Family Rating to C from Caa2 and Probability of Default
Rating to D-PD from Caa2-PD). Moody's also downgraded the senior
secured first lien notes of Hexion Inc, Hexion US Finance Corp.,
and Hexion 2 US Finance Corp. to Ca from Caa1, the senior secured
(1.5 lien) notes of Hexion Inc, to C from Caa3 and Hexion Inc.'s
senior secured second lien notes to C from Ca. Additionally Moody's
affirmed the rating of C on the senior unsecured debentures of
Borden Chemical, Inc. (Old). The downgrade was prompted by the
company's announcement that it voluntarily filed for reorganization
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on April 1,
2019. The Speculative Grade Liquidity rating was downgraded to
SGL-4 from SGL-3. The outlook is stable. Subsequent to its actions,
Moody's will withdraw all ratings.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Hexion Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to D-PD from Caa2-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to C from Caa2

GTD Senior Secured Global Notes, Downgraded to Ca (LGD3) from Caa1
(LGD3)

GTD Senior Secured 1.5 Lien Notes, Downgraded to C (LGD5) from Caa3
(LGD5)

GTD Senior Secured 2nd Lien Notes, Downgraded to C (LGD5) from Ca
(LGD5)

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Downgraded to SGL-4 from SGL-3

Issuer: Hexion US Finance Corp.

Backed GTD Senior Secured Notes, Downgraded to Ca (LGD3) from Caa1
(LGD3)

Issuer: Hexion 2 US Finance Corp.

Senior Secured Global Notes, Downgraded to Ca (LGD3) from Caa1
(LGD3)

Affirmation:

Issuer: Borden Chemical, Inc. (Old)

Backed Senior Unsecured Notes, at C (LGD6)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Hexion Inc.

Outlook, Remains Stable

Issuer: Hexion US Finance Corp.

Outlook, Remains Stable

Issuer: Hexion 2 US Finance Corp.

Outlook, Remains Stable

Issuer: Borden Chemical, Inc. (Old)

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The downgrade follows the announcement that Hexion Inc. has filed
voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware. Hexion's operations outside the U.S. are not included in
the Chapter 11 proceedings. Management believes that liquidity from
operations combined with the company's planned Debtor-In-Possession
financing (unrated) is sufficient to continue operational and
restructuring needs on a global basis.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Chemical
Industry published in March 2019.

Hexion Inc., headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, is a leading producer
of thermoset resins (epoxy, phenolic and amino). The company is
also a supplier of specialty resins sold to a diverse customer
base, as well as a producer of commodities such as formaldehyde,
bisphenol A (BPA), epichlorohydrin (ECH), versatic acid and related
derivatives. Revenues are approximately $3.75 billion. The majority
owner of Hexion is an affiliate of Apollo Management.


IOWA FINANCE: Fitch Rates $120MM Series 2019 Refunding Bonds 'B-'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'B-' rating to the Iowa Finance
Authority's $120 million Midwestern Disaster Area Revenue Series
2019 Refunding Bonds. The Rating Outlook is Positive.

The Iowa Finance Authority has issued a total of $1.185 billion
($1.156 billion outstanding) of revenue bonds on behalf of Iowa
Fertilizer Company LLC (IFCo).

RATING RATIONALE

The ratings reflect the limited remaining margin of safety for
repayment of the bonds under Fitch's rating case scenario. The
project has stabilized its production profile and is generating
sufficient operating cash flows with a long-term financial profile
consistent with the rating. The facility remains vulnerable to a
volatile and potentially weak product pricing environment.
Favorably, access to abundant and advantageously priced feedstock
partially mitigates margin risk. The project has sufficient
liquidity available in the form of various reserve funds and a
working capital facility to mitigate short-term liquidity issues.

The Positive Outlook reflects that the project has largely resolved
ramp-up issues. It is operationally positioned to benefit from an
improving pricing environment if it can maintain a stable operating
profile and control costs consistent with base case expectations
while favorable pricing trends last.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Nitrogen Market Price Exposure - Revenue Risk: Weaker

IFCo sells its nitrogen products to farmers, distributors,
wholesalers, cooperatives, truck stop operators and blenders at
market prices. The project's main products have historically
exhibited considerable price volatility. The project enjoys some
geographical product pricing advantages but remains exposed to
long-term market supply and demand risks.

Advantageous Access to Natural Gas - Supply Risk: Midrange

The project is procuring its natural gas feedstock via an existing
pipeline at prices linked to the Henry Hub index, which is an
important advantage compared with some international competitors.
IFCo has entered into natural gas call swaptions for the first
seven years of the project to moderate the risk of a reversal in
gas pricing trends. In addition, the project will fund a feedstock
reserve and can enter into further call swaptions to help mitigate
price risk during the non-hedged period, which would also dispense
with the requirement to fund a hedging reserve account.

Unproven Operating Profile - Operation Risk: Midrange

Non-feedstock O&M and maintenance cost projections have not been
tested over an extended period of time, and the project may require
several years of operations to establish a stable cost profile. The
use of commercially proven technologies and a plant design with
oversized capacity could help mitigate operating performance risk.


Standard Debt Structure - Debt Structure: Midrange

Fixed-rate, fully amortizing debt structure is consistent with
other project financings. Relatively high equity distribution
triggers and a debt service reserve equivalent to six months of
senior bond payments support debt repayment during periods of low
operating cash flow. Operating and major maintenance reserves help
shield the project from cash flow shortfalls and can be tapped to
meet debt service.

Improved Long Term Financial Profile:

The project is demonstrating largely stable operations. Its ability
to meet ongoing mandatory debt payments is vulnerable to product
pricing remaining at currently depressed levels on a sustained
basis. Fitch's base and rating cases indicate that debt service
coverage ratios (DSCR) at current product prices would average 3.1x
and 1.5x through debt maturity. A rating case minimum DSCR of 1.0x
early in the project life is a potential concern, but the project
should have enough liquidity to mitigate any short-term cash flow
deficiencies. On a long-term basis, the project's relatively high
equity distribution triggers should support debt repayment and
replenishment of reserves during potential periods of low operating
cash flow.

Peer Analysis: IFCo's peer group includes merchant project
financings in which product sales are susceptible to the inherent
volatility of commodity markets. Merchant projects that have
achieved ratings in the 'BB' category have demonstrated some
combination of long-term feedstock price certainty, materially
lower leverage, structural enhancements, or a proven,
quasi-monopolistic competitive advantage. Merchant projects in the
'B' rating category or lower typically face significant technology
implementation or construction risks, are exposed to price and
volume risk, and operate in a business environment with highly
volatile margins.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action:

  -- Early operational performance below expectations or weakening
in near-term product prices;

  -- A fundamental shift in the supply-demand balance or global
producer cost curve that results in materially lower operating
margins expected to persist over a long period;

  -- Inability to effectively manage operating costs or failure to
reach and sustain projected capacity and utilization rates;

  -- Failure to refinance 2023-2025 bond maturities could heighten
payment default in those years due to high level of debt service.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action:

  -- Sustained product prices at least in line with expected 2019
prices with modest escalation;

  -- Sustained production and margins exceeding expectations.

CREDIT UPDATE

IFCo is refunding $120 million aggregate principal amounts of the
Series 2013 Bonds due Dec. 1, 2022 through an issuance of new
Series 2019 bonds with the same terms and sinking fund payments.
The refunding allows the project to reduce the interest expense,
but given the size of the transaction relative to overall debt
outstanding it does not have a material impact on the financial
profile. This refunding transaction has been priced and is expected
to close on April 3, 2019.

The project has been operating for almost a year and a half, and
after encountering some ramp-up issues has achieved a relatively
stable operating profile. It has gone through winterization and
downtimes are becoming less frequent and shorter in duration.
Despite above-mentioned teething issues it has achieved higher than
nameplate capacity on its production lines, and as supported by
Nexant (IE) it is expected that it will operate at higher than
original nameplate capacity on a sustained basis, which is
reflected in Fitch's cases.

In 2018 the project's actual DSCR was 1.5x compared with last
year's base and rating case expectation at 2.3x and 1.5x for that
year, reflecting early ramp-up issues in 2018. The project realized
higher revenues but also incurred higher expenses, both fixed costs
and variable production costs that increased because of higher
volumes. The project has taken steps to reduce costs by optimizing
the steam turbine cogeneration unit, reducing reliance on outside
power generation and on outside contractors. Fitch expects that it
will take a couple of years to establish a stable and predictable
cost profile.

The project has created a joint venture (JV) with Dakota
Gasification Company for the marketing and distribution of their
products. The JV allows the partners improved freight economics,
and provides their customers with improved supply security, which
in turn ensures access to larger distributors and better
contracting options. Through the JV the project has also been
leasing storage space and built its own storage for diesel exhaust
fuel. These efforts, coupled with the ability to swing the
production between various products, provide operational and
marketing flexibility and enable the project to improve the
realized sales prices compared with average annual product prices
as they can adjust for seasonal or other swings in the prices.

IFCo's operating margins remain dependent on favorable market
pricing for nitrogen products. The pricing of nitrogen products is
somewhat correlated to the price of feedstock, which may be oil,
coal or natural gas depending on the region and producer. In recent
years, the substantial declines in oil and natural gas prices have
driven nitrogen prices to levels approaching 10-year lows. These
pricing trends have diverged significantly from market consultant
forecasts that formed the basis for cash flow projections for the
original financing. There has been significant price recovery as
December 2018 prices for ammonia, urea and UAN are up to 80% higher
than 2017 lows.

IFCo management expects continued nitrogen fertilizer supply
shutdowns in China and overall global supply additions that are
below demand growth from developing countries, which should support
prices. It remains to be seen if the positive trends are sustained,
which will drive the project's future credit profile now that it
has reached full operational phase. Favorably, U.S. natural gas
prices trade at a significant discount to global energy prices, and
are close to 50% of what was projected in 2013, providing the
project with a competitive advantage. Fitch and other market
participants believe that U.S. gas prices will remain low into the
foreseeable future. The project has access to abundant natural gas
feedstock at prices currently below Henry Hub. It has recently put
in place hedging to crystalize some of this upside. For 2019, IFCo
has locked in the pricing for 74% of its gas needs at $2.42/MMBtu,
and specifically for the second quarter of 2019 99% of its gas
needs at $2.27.

Through the price declines and international nitrogen price
weakness, interior U.S. premiums such as in the Cornbelt states
have largely remained intact as there remains insufficient regional
supply to meet demand, benefitting the project.

FITCH CASES

Fitch's base and rating cases have been revised to reflect updated
product prices, feedstock prices, operating profile, operating
costs based on actual operations and assumptions regarding planned
future refundings.

For the base case Fitch assumed a revision to the project's
nameplate capacity in line with the IE's recommendation, sponsor
assumptions on costs, flat 10-year average product prices with no
escalation that capture a full pricing cycle and gradually rising
feedstock prices. Based on discussions with the project management
team, Fitch incorporated assumptions regarding several refundings
to achieve lower interest payments and to improve the debt
amortization profile, most significant of which is a partial
refunding of 2023 to 2025 maturities. The coverages under this
scenario average 3.1x and reach a minimum of 2.1x. Fitch notes that
using forecast 2019 prices with no escalation in the same scenario
bring the average and minimum to 1.7x and 1.2x respectively,
demonstrating the project's sensitivity to product prices.

Relative to Fitch's base case, for the rating case the agency
additionally assumes an elevated gas price curve, 10% non-feedstock
cost stress, 7.5% production level stress and average 2018 product
prices with 2% annual escalation. This scenario would put increased
pressure on the financial profile and suggests that IFCo may face
periods where debt service would reach breakeven levels. The rating
case DSCRs average 1.5x and reach the 1.0x minimum early in project
life, with lower average but a higher minimum than the 2018 rating
case (2.3x and 0.8x respectively). Fitch does not expect that
coverages would fall below 1.0x and anticipates that the project
will have sufficient liquidity to mitigate occasional short-term
cash flow deficiency.



JAMES LARRY BAIN: Proposed RE/MAX Auction of Arab Property Approved
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge James R. Robinson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Alabama authorized James Larry Bain's
employment of Steve Carter and RE/MAX Guntersville as auctioneer,
nunc pro tunc Feb. 14, 2019, to conduct the public auction sale of
his home and approximately 20 acres located at 750 Mount Oak Drive,
Arab, Marshall County, Alabama.

A hearing on the Motion was held on March 14, 2019 10:20 a.m.

The terms of compensation are not approved at this time and will be
subject to review following the filing of an application consistent
with the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. Section 101
et seq. and the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

The sale of the real property will not be not free and clear.

James Larry Bain sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Ala.
Case No. 16-41436) on Sept. 2, 2016.  The Debtor tapped Tameria S.
Driskill, Esq., as counsel.  On Aug. 30, 2018, the Court appointed
Steve Carver and RE/MAX Guntersville as broker.



JOSEPH BRENNICK: $460K Sale of Trust's York Property to Weston OK'd
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Catherine Peek McEwen of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida authorized Joseph A. Brennick's sale of
The Brennick Irrevocable Family Trust's real property located at 56
Beech Ridge Road, York, Maine to Howard F. Weston, doing business
as Stillwater Capital, for $460,000, cash.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Feb. 28, 2019, at 1:30 p.m.

The U.S. Bank Objection is overruled as moot.   The Amended IRS
Objection is sustained.  The IRS' federal tax liens attach to the
Debtor's beneficial interest (as a beneficiary of the Trust) in the
net sale proceeds to the same extent, validity, and priority as
existed prepetition.

The Debtor, as the Trustee of the Trust, is further authorized to
cause the Trust to pay the Closing Costs at closing and to deposit
the remaining balance of the sale proceeds into Stichter, Riedel,
Blain & Postler, P.A.'s trust account.

The 14-day stays set forth in Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d)
are waived, for good cause shown, and this Order will be
immediately enforceable and the closing may occur immediately
following the entry of the Order.

Joseph A. Brennick sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla.
Case No. 18-07874) on Sept. 18, 2018.  The Debtor tapped Edward J.
Peterson, III, Esq., at Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A., as
counsel.



JOSEPH BRENNICK: $65K Sale of Myakka Property to Swatsworth Okayed
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Catherine Peek McEwen of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida authorized Joseph A. Brennick's sale of
the vacant real property located at 1050 397th Court E., Myakka
City, Florida to Roger Swatsworth for $65,000.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Feb. 28, 2019, at 1:30 p.m.

The IRS Objection is sustained.  The IRS' federal tax liens attach
to the Debtor's beneficial interest in the net sale proceeds to the
same extent, validity, and priority as existed prepetition.

The sale is free and clear of any and all liens, claims,
encumbrances and interests.

The Purchaser will pay $65,000 in cash at the closing of the
purchase and sale transaction as contemplated by the Contract in
accordance with the terms of the Contract and the Order.

The Seller will be responsible for the Closing Costs as further
detailed in the Contract, which will be paid from the proceeds from
the sale at the Closing.

In addition, the Seller will be authorized to pay any brokers' fees
contemplated by the Contract, in a total amount not to exceed 6%,
which will be paid directly from the proceeds from the sale at the
Closing.

The remainder of the proceeds after payment of the Closing Costs
and the Broker Fees will be distributed to Wauchula State Bank.
The payment received by Wauchula State Bank will be applied to
reduce Wauchula State Bank's secured claim.  Ordinary and necessary
pro-rations will be applied at the Closing pursuant to the terms of
the Contract, including pro-rations for 2019 real estate taxes, and
for income and expenses from the Real Property.

Notwithstanding Bankruptcy Rule 6004(g), and 6006(d) and 7062, the
Order is effective and enforceable immediately upon entry and there
is no reason for delay in the implementation of the Order.

Joseph A. Brennick sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla.
Case No. 18-07874) on Sept. 18, 2018.  The Debtor tapped Edward J.
Peterson, III, Esq., at Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A., as
counsel.



JOSEPH BRENNICK: $70K Sale of Wauchula Property to Tenerife Okayed
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Catherine Peek McEwen of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida authorized Joseph A. Brennick's sale of
a parcel of real property consisting of two vacant lots located at
302 W. Main St., Wauchula, Florida to Tenerife Southwest
Investments, Inc., for $70,000.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Feb. 28, 2019, at 1:30 p.m.

The IRS Objection is sustained.  The IRS' federal tax liens attach
to the Debtor's beneficial interest in the net sale proceeds to the
same extent, validity, and priority as existed prepetition.

The sale is free and clear of any and all liens, claims,
encumbrances and interests.

The Purchaser will pay $70,000 in cash at the closing of the
purchase and sale transaction as contemplated by the Contract in
accordance with the terms of the Contract and the Order.

The Seller will be responsible for the Closing Costs as further
detailed in the Contract, which will be paid from the proceeds from
the sale at the Closing.

In addition, the Seller will be authorized to pay any brokers' fees
contemplated by the Contract, in a total amount not to exceed 6%,
which will be paid directly from the proceeds from the sale at the
Closing.

The remainder of the proceeds after payment of the Closing Costs
and the Broker Fees will be distributed to Wauchula State Bank.
The payment received by Wauchula State Bank will be applied to
reduce Wauchula State Bank's secured claim.  Ordinary and necessary
pro-rations will be applied at the Closing pursuant to the terms of
the Contract, including pro-rations for 2019 real estate taxes, and
for income and expenses from the Real Property.

Notwithstanding Bankruptcy Rule 6004(g), and 6006(d) and 7062, the
Order is effective and enforceable immediately upon entry and there
is no reason for delay in the implementation of the Order.

Joseph A. Brennick sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla.
Case No. 18-07874) on Sept. 18, 2018.  The Debtor tapped Edward J.
Peterson, III, Esq., at Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A., as
counsel.



LA STEEL SERVICES: Wants Confirmation Deadline Extended to June 21
------------------------------------------------------------------
LA Steel Services, Inc. asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California to modify the 45-day deadline for
plan confirmation in its Chapter 11 case.

The hearing on confirmation of the company's proposed Chapter 11
reorganization plan is scheduled for June 4.  Given that the
hearing will be held after the May 8 deadline for plan confirmation
under Section 1129(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, LA Steel proposed
that the deadline be modified such that it is extended through June
21.

Pursuant to the plan, allowed claims of general unsecured creditors
will either be paid in full as a cure upon assumption of the
subcontract or paid in full over 60 months after the plan takes
effect. LA Steel expects only Pacific Steel Group will vote to
reject the plan.

                   About LA Steel Services Inc.

LA Steel Services, Inc. -- http://www.lasteelservices.com/-- is a
construction company in Corona, California, specializing in heavy
highway and bridge construction and public or civil works
infrastructure. It also offers reinforcing steel design
consultations, value engineering, and constructability review.

LA Steel Services sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-15841) on July 12,
2018.  In the petition signed by Pamela Lee Albright, president,
the Debtor disclosed $5.15 million in assets and $3.51 million in
liabilities.  

Judge Mark D. Houle oversees the case.  The Debtor tapped Shulman
Hodges & Bastian LLP as its legal counsel.


LA STEEL: June 4 Plan Confirmation Hearing
------------------------------------------
The Disclosure Statement explaining LA Steel Services, Inc.'s
Chapter 11 Plan is approved for dissemination.

The hearing on the confirmation of the Plan will be held on June 4,
2019, at 3:00 p.m.

Ballots accepting or rejecting the Plan must be returned  on or
before 5:00 p.m. (PST) on April 23, 2019.

Any opposition to confirmation of the Plan shall be filed with the
Court and served on or before May 14, 2019.

Replies to any opposition to confirmation of the Plan shall be
filed with the Court and served on or before May 21, 2019.

              About LA Steel Services Inc.

LA Steel Services, Inc. -- http://www.lasteelservices.com/-- is a
construction company in Corona, California, specializing in heavy
highway and bridge construction and public or civil works
infrastructure. It also offers reinforcing steel design
consultations, value engineering, and constructability review.

LA Steel Services sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-15841) on July 12,
2018.  In the petition signed by Pamela Lee Albright, president,
the Debtor disclosed $5.15 million in assets and $3.51 million in
liabilities.  

Judge Mark D. Houle oversees the case.  The Debtor tapped Shulman
Hodges & Bastian LLP as its legal counsel.


LAKEVIEW VILLAGE: Fitch Affirms BB+ Rating on 2017A & 2018A Bonds
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the 'BB+' rating to the following City
of Lenexa, Kansas Health Care Facility Revenue bonds issued on
behalf of Lakeview Village, Inc.:

  -- $16.3 million series 2017A

  -- $52 million series 2018A.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The bonds are secured by a pledge of unrestricted receivables,
leasehold interest on the existing facility and a DSRF.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

STABLE FINANCIAL PROFILE: The affirmation at 'BB+' reflects
Lakeview's stable financial profile in fiscal 2018. Weaker
investment markets at the end of fiscal 2018 resulted in unrealized
losses of over $1.7 million; however, Lakeview was still able to
maintain liquidity metrics of 294 days cash on hand (DCOH), 43.8%
cash to debt and 5.3x cushion ratio, in line with fiscal 2017
levels. Furthermore, profitability was also adequate in fiscal 2018
as evidenced by its 99.5% operating ratio, 7.7% net operating
margin (NOM), and 23% NOM-adjusted (NOMA), favorable to the
respective below investment grade (BIG) medians of 101.6%, 5.1% and
18.3%.

COMPETITIVE OPERATING ENVIRONMENT: Lakeview operates in a very
competitive environment, reflected in its independent living unit
(ILU) occupancy, which averaged only 82% in fiscal 2018. Management
continues to replace older four-plex cottages with single family
and duplex units that are expected to help improve occupancy over
time. Although ILU occupancy was soft, assisted living unit (ALU)
and skilled nursing facility (SNF) occupancy averaged a strong 95%
and 92% in 2018. The community continues to differentiate itself
from competitors through the high quality of healthcare services
for residents on campus, and benefits from Lakeview run
rehabilitation and therapy clinics in the local market, which help
draw prospective residents on campus.

MANAGEABLE LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: Lakeview's debt burden is
manageable as evidenced by maximum annual debt service (MADS)
equating to 13.1% of fiscal 2018 (unaudited) revenues.
Additionally, Lakeview's debt to net available measured 6x in
fiscal 2018, which is favorable to Fitch's BIG category median of
9.8x.

ASYMMETRIC RISK FACTORS: No asymmetric risk factors were
incorporated into the rating determination.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

OPERATING STABILITY: Fitch expects Lakeview to maintain consistent
operating performance over the medium term. Large improvements in
ILU occupancy that positively impact profitability, debt service
coverage and balance sheet strength may lead to upward rating
movement. Conversely, weaker operations that result in a declining
financial profile could place negative pressure on the rating.

CREDIT PROFILE

Lakeview Village is a predominantly lifecare community currently
offering fully amortizing, 75% refundable, and rental contracts,
located on an approximately 96-acre campus in Lenexa, Kansas, a
suburb of Kansas City. Lakeview's campus consists of 543 ILUs, 26
ALUs, a 120-bed SNF and 38 short-term rehabilitation beds. The
corporation currently considers 37 ILUs and three ALUs to be
unmarketable, and all occupancy statistics are calculated on a
marketable unit basis. Lakeview has three affiliated entities that
are not obligated on the outstanding bonds including a foundation
and two independent living HUD properties. Fitch uses only Lakeview
Village Inc. financials for its analysis and all figures cited in
this press release. Lakeview had $44 million in (unaudited) total
revenues in 2018.

STABLE FINANCIAL PROFILE

Lakeview's financial profile was stable in fiscal 2018.
Unrestricted cash and investments totaled approximately $31 million
at Dec. 31, 2018, up slightly from a year prior even in the midst
of over $1.7 in unrealized losses in 2018. Liquidity ratios of 294
DCOH, 43.8% cash to debt and 5.3x cushion ratio are good for the
current rating and remain above the BIG category medians of 292
DCOH, 32.1% cash to debt and 4.5x cushion ratio. The overwhelming
majority of Lakeview's contracts are non-refundable, which
strengthens cash flow and provides balance sheet stability.

Profitability was adequate despite weak ILU occupancy of only 82%
in 2018. The community's 99.5% operating ratio and 23% NOMA were in
line with results from 2017 of 100.1% and 23.1%, respectively.
These metrics compare favorably to Fitch's below investment grade
operating ratio and NOMA medians 101.6 and 18.3%. Given the
improved profitability levels from a few years prior, manageable
capital expenditure needs and good net entrance fee receipts ($7.5
million in 2018), Fitch expects liquidity metrics to slowly improve
over time. Material strengthening of liquidity metrics to levels
consistent with 'BBB' rated peers could lead to positive rating
movement.

COMPETITIVE OPERATING ENVIRONMENT

Lakeview operates within a competitive environment, with three
other full service retirement communities within its primary
marketing area (PMA), including two newer communities that opened
in 2007, as well as other for-profit retirement population care
providers. The competitive environment somewhat limits Lakeview's
pricing power and flexibility and remains a continual challenge.

The community has a high average age of plant and some unmarketable
units (53 as of Dec. 31, 2018), which increases the ILU occupancy
challenges. Management continually strives to enhance the appeal of
ILUs on campus by repositioning older four-plex cottages with more
modern single family and duplex buildings and combining smaller
apartment units, which is possible due to the concrete and steel
construction of the buildings. This combination helps Lakeview meet
current market demands and right size the campus by reducing the
number of ILUs. Management anticipates continuing these practices
over the longer term. Annual capital expenditures were 112.6% of
depreciation in 2018 and the average age of plant has continued to
rise to 15.9 years in 2018 from 14.6 years in 2017. The community's
five-year capital improvements program has budgeted to spend 110%
of depreciation over the next five years on refreshes throughout
the campus, which should help the campus stay updated and in line
with current standards. Consistent execution of campus updates,
combined with higher entrance fees and margins for the new ILUs,
should be accretive to Lakeview's balance sheet over time.

Census in assisted living and skilled nursing was strong in 2018 at
95% and 92%. To stay competitive and improve occupancy, management
took 14 short-term rehab beds out of service on July 1, 2018 (down
from 52 to 38). In 2019, the rehab beds will all be converted to
private units, which should help the community to effectively
compete for Medicare business. The total cost to privatize the
rehab beds is approximately $400 thousand and the project is
expected to be completed by the end of 2019.

Management is proactive in its strategies to drive more volume into
its rehab center, as demonstrated by the opening of a number of
outpatient therapy suites in the broader community, which are
expected to act as feeders to the main campus. The newly built
private rooms and management's strategies are designed to increase
utilization of the rehab facility over the medium to longer term.
Furthermore, Lakeview also runs a home health business that showed
significant growth in 2018 and helps to diversify the community's
revenue streams.

MANAGEABLE LONG-TERM LIABILITY PROFILE

As of Dec. 31, 2018, Lakeview had approximately $69 million
outstanding in long-term debt, which is primarily comprised of $52
million in fixed-rate series 2018A bonds and $16 million in
fixed-rate series 2017A bonds. Lakeview's long-term liability
profile was manageable in fiscal 2018, with MADS to revenue of
13.1% and debt-to-net available of 6x. The organization has no swap
exposure.



LIGHTFOOT FAMILY: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
----------------------------------------------------------
No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of Lightfoot Family Enterprises, LLC as of
April 2, according to a court docket.
    
                 About Lightfoot Family Enterprises

Lightfoot Family Enterprises, LLC sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case No. 19-41576) on
March 18, 2019.  The case has been assigned to Judge Charles E.
Rendlen III.  Affinity Law Group is the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.


LINDA THE BRA LADY: Simone Perele Objects to Disclosures, Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Simone Perele USA, Inc., ("SP") submits a limited and conditional
objection to the Small Business Combined Plan of Reorganization and
Disclosure Statement filed by

SP complains that the Plan and Disclosure Statement does not
property provide that it is wholly contingent upon and can only
become effective in the event that the contemplated  sale to Spano,
LLC, on terms acceptable to SP, closes and that it is otherwise
confirmed without substantial modifications affecting the rights of
SP.

SP further complains that to the extent that Objection 1 is not
resolved so as to protect the  rights of SP, SP further objects to
the Plan and Disclosure Statement on the grounds that it fails  to
include SP as a creditor, afford SP plan payments in accordance
with its rights under 11 U.S.C. Section 502, is not feasible and is
otherwise wholly violative of and cannot as a consequence be
confirmed in accordance with 11 U.S.C. Section 1129 (a) or (b).

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
http://tinyurl.com/y5lgsfj9from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Co-Counsel for Simone Perele US, Inc.:

     Anthony A. Boyadjis, Esq.
     LAW OFFICE OF ANTHONY A. BOYADJIS
     103 Washington Street
     Morristown, NJ 07960
     Phone: (973) 538-5512

        -- and --

     Randolph E. White, Esq.
     David Y. Wolnerman, Esq.
     WHITE & WOLNERMAN, PLLC
     950 Third Ave, 11th Floor
     New York, NY 10022
     Tel: (212) 308-0607

               About Linda The Bra Lady

Linda the Bra Lady LLC sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-12469) on Feb. 7, 2018, listing under
$500,000 in assets and under $10 million in liabilities.  The Hon.
Jerrold N. Poslusny Jr. presides over the case.  E. Richard
Dressel, Esq., at Flaster Greenberg, represents the Debtor.

Founder Linda Becker operates two stores, one on Manhattan's East
Side and another in southern New Jersey.  The Company has been in
business for 30 years.


LK BENNETT USA: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: L.K. Bennett U.S.A., Inc.
        595 Madison Avenue
        New York, NY 10022

Business Description: L.K. Bennett U.S.A., Inc. is a retailer of
                      the L.K. Bennett luxury fashion brand.
                      Founded in London in 1990 by Linda Bennett,
                      L.K. Bennett offers women's shoes, clothing,
                      handbags, accessories, and jewelries.  L.K.
                      Bennett is available in standalone stores
                      across the United States, Europe and the
                      Middle East, lkbennett.com, us.lkbennett.com

                      and in select department stores worldwide.
                      L.K. Bennett Limited owns 100% of the common
                      stock of L.K. Bennett U.S.A, Inc.  

                      https://us.lkbennett.com/

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 3, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Delaware (Delaware)

Case No.: 19-10760

Judge: Hon. Kevin Gross

Debtor's
General
Bankruptcy
Counsel:          Stuart M. Brown, Esq.
                  DLA PIPER LLP (US)
                  1201 North Market Street, Suite 2100
                  Wilmington, DE 19801
                  Tel: 302-468-5640
                  Fax: 302-778-7913
                  Email: stuart.brown@dlapiper.com

Debtor's
Restructuring
Advisor:          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Andrey Komrakov, assistant secretary and
financial officer.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb19-10760.pdf


LNB-002-2013: Seeks to Extend Exclusive Filing Period to June 27
----------------------------------------------------------------
LNB-002-2013, LLC asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida to extend the period during which it has the
exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan through June 27, and to
solicit acceptances for the plan through Aug. 27.

The extension, if granted by the court, would give the company more
time to negotiate with creditors and its lender on a consensual
plan, according to court filings.

                      About LNB-002-2013 LLC

LNB-002-2013, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-20502) on Aug. 28,
2018.  In the petition signed by Laurent Benzaquen, manager LNB
Capital LLC, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of less than $500,000.  The Debtor tapped Joel M.
Aresty P.A. as its legal counsel.  No official committee of
unsecured creditors has been appointed in the case.


LONG BLOCKCHAIN: Subsidiary Secures C$450,000 in Loans
------------------------------------------------------
Long Island Brand Beverages LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Long
Blockchain Corp., obtained on March 27, 2019, an advance of
C$200,000 (or approximately $150,000) from ECC Ventures 2 Corp. and
an advance of C$250,000 (or approximately $187,500) from Long
Island Beverages Corp.  ECC2 previously had advanced C$50,000 (or
approximately $37,5000) to LIBB.

The Loans by ECC2 were made pursuant to a loan agreement by and
among LIBB, the Company and ECC Ventures 2 Corp. and a general
security agreement, by and between LIBB and ECC2, each dated as of
Jan. 31, 2019.  The Loan by LIBC was made on terms substantially
similar to those contained in the Loan Agreement and Security
Agreement.  As previously disclosed, the Company, ECC2 and LIBC are
party to that certain letter of intent, dated Jan. 16, 2019,
relating to the sale of LIBB to ECC2 for a combination of cash and
shares of ECC2.

The Loans incur interest at a rate of 10% per annum and mature on
July 31, 2019.  Accrued and unpaid interest is payable in cash on
July 1, 2019 and on the first day of each calendar month
thereafter. The guaranty terminates upon consummation of a sale of
all or substantially all of the equity or assets of LIBB to the
Lender or its affiliates.  The Loans are secured by all of the
assets of LIBB and are guaranteed by the Company.

The Loan Agreement contains customary representations and
warranties and affirmative and negative covenants of LIBB,
including without limitation covenants that restrict LIBB from
making investments, incurring liens and permitting a change of
control to occur, subject to certain exceptions.

The Loan Agreement provides that the termination of the LOI or any
definitive agreements executed with respect to the Transactions,
the breach of the LOI or Definitive Agreements by the Company or
LIBB, and certain other customary events constitute events of
default. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, at the option
of the Lender, all principal and interest under the Lender's Loan
will become immediately due and payable.  Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if the event of default relates to the termination of
the LOI or Definitive Agreements by the Lender without the consent
of LIBB, or the termination of such agreements by another party
based on a breach by the Lender, LIBB will have 30 days after
demand to repay the Lender's Loan.

The Company used $235,000 of the Loans to satisfy in full its
obligations under that certain agreement for the purchase and sale
of future receipts, dated Nov. 27, 2017, with Radium2 Capital Inc.
Pursuant to the Radium Agreement, Radium was entitled to receive
15% of the proceeds from the Company's future sales, up to a
specified maximum amount.  Upon payment of the $235,000, the Radium
Agreement was terminated and the Company has no further obligation
thereunder.

                          Davidson Settlement

On April 1, 2019, the Company entered into a settlement agreement
with Julian Davidson, the Company's former Chairman of the Board,
pursuant to which the Company and Mr. Davidson finally settled
certain claims made by Mr. Davidson for severance.  Pursuant to the
settlement agreement, among other things, the Company agreed to
issue 1,000,000 shares of common stock to Mr. Davidson and granted
Mr. Davidson certain registration rights with respect to the
shares. The shares are being issued to Mr. Davidson in a private
placement in reliance on the exemption from registration provided
by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

                     About Long Blockchain Corp.

Headquartered in Hicksville, New York, Long Blockchain Corp. --
http://www.longblockchain.com/-- is focused on developing and
investing in globally scalable blockchain-based financial
technology solutions.  It is dedicated to becoming a significant
participant in the evolution of blockchain technology that creates
long-term value for its shareholders and the global community by
investing in and developing businesses that are "on-chain".
Blockchain technology is fundamentally changing the way people and
businesses transact, and the Company will strive to be at the
forefront of this dynamic industry, actively pursuing
opportunities.  Its wholly-owned subsidiary Long Island Brand
Beverages, LLC operates in the non-alcohol ready-to-drink segment
of the beverage industry under its flagship brand 'The Original
Long Island Brand Iced Tea'.

Long Blockchain incurred a net loss of $15.21 million in 2017 and a
net loss of $10.44 million in 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Long
Blockchain had $11.28 million in total assets, $3.68 million in
total liabilities, and $7.59 million in total stockholders'
equity.

Marcum LLP, the Company's auditor since 2014, issued a "going
concern" opinion in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, citing that the
Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has incurred
significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to meet its
obligations and sustain its operations.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


LOVEJOY'S FAMILY: Unsecured Creditors to Get $450K in 4 Payments
----------------------------------------------------------------
Lovejoy's Family Moving, Inc., dba Republic Moving & Storage, Inc.,
filed a Chapter 11 Plan and accompanying Disclosure Statement.

Class 5 - Allowed General Unsecured Claims.  Payment of Pro Rata
Distributions of the total amount of $450,000 paid in four annual
installments over the course of the Plan.

Class 1 - Allowed Secured Claim of BOW. Entitled to receive the
Distributions of its Allowed Secured Claim and the BOW Subordinated
Claim.

Class 2 - Any Allowed Secured Claims of the Creditors Listed in the
Plan. Entitled to receive the Distributions of the Plan.

The funding for the Distributions to be made by the Reorganized
Debtor under the Plan will be derived, in part, from the following:
(a) the Debtor's Cash as of the Effective Date; (b) Cash that will
be generated from the Reorganized Debtor's operations after the
Effective Date; (c) new funding that the Debtor anticipates will be
obtained by the Reorganized Debtor after the Effective Date (i.e.,
the Post-Effective Date Loan); (d) proceeds from the assertion of
Causes of Action, including Avoidance Actions; and (e) possible
sales of Assets of the Reorganized Debtor.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 28, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y2nxuv5mfrom PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

             About Lovejoy's Family Moving

Headquartered in Chula Vista, California, Republic Moving & Storage
Inc. -- https://www.republicmoving.com/ -- provides moving and
storage solutions for residential homes, military personnel, and
commercial businesses throughout Southern California and the
world.

Lovejoy's Family Moving sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-16624) on Aug. 6,
2018.  In the petition signed by Joseph W. Lovejoy, president, the
Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Scott C. Clarkson
presides over the case.

Lovejoy's originally tapped Illyssa I. Fogel & Associates as its
legal counsel.  The Debtor later hired Winthrop Couchot Golubow
Hollander, LLP as its new general insolvency counsel.


MAURICE SPORTING: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to May 20
--------------------------------------------------------------
Maurice Sporting Goods of Delaware, Inc. asked the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to extend the period during
which the company and its affiliates has the exclusive right to
file a Chapter 11 plan through May 20, and to solicit acceptances
for the plan through July 22.

The companies' current exclusive filing period expired on March 18
while they can solicit acceptances for the plan through May 13.

Since their bankruptcy filing, the companies have made significant
progress to reorganize their affairs, which included the sale of
most of their assets to Middleton Management Company, Inc.  

Recently, the companies have been focused on analyzing the claims
filed by creditors, some of which presented complex issues of
international law, and filing objections to certain claims
necessary to facilitate a plan of liquidation, according to court
filings.

                    About Maurice Sporting Goods

Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., established in 1923, is a
family-owned distributor of outdoor sporting goods specializing in
fishing; marine; sports licensed products and souvenirs; outdoor
gifts and decor; hunting; and camping and outdoor recreation.
Collectively, Maurice Sporting Goods services more than 15,000
store fronts across the United States, Canada, South America, and
Europe.

Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., and 4 affiliated companies sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12481) on
Nov. 20, 2017.  Maurice Sporting Goods estimated $10 million to $50
million in total assets and $100 million to $500 million in total
liabilities.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, as
counsel; Patrick J. O'Malley of Development Specialists, Inc., as
restructuring advisor; Silverman Consulting as financial advisor;
Livingstone Partners LLC as investment banker; and Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions, LLC, as claims, solicitation and balloting agent.


MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL: Widens Net Loss to $678.8-Mil. in 2018
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Monitronics International, Inc. has filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K reporting a net
loss of $678.75 million on $540.35 million of net revenue for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $111.29 million
on $553.45 million of net revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.
The increase in net loss is primarily related to the $563,549,000
goodwill impairment recognized in 2018 and reductions in net
revenue offset by the $28,000,000 legal settlement reserve
recognized in the second quarter of 2017.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, Monitronics had $1.30 billion in total assets,
$1.89 billion in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $588.97 million.

At Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had $2,188,000 of cash and cash
equivalents.  The Company's primary source of funds is its cash
flows from operating activities which are generated from alarm
monitoring and related service revenues.  During the years ended
Dec. 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company's cash flow from operating
activities was $104,503,000 and $150,204,000, respectively.

During the years ended Dec. 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company used
cash of $140,450,000 and $142,909,000, respectively, to fund
subscriber account acquisitions, net of holdback and guarantee
obligations.  In addition, during the years ended Dec. 31, 2018 and
2017, the Company used cash of $14,903,000 and $14,393,000,
respectively, to fund its capital expenditures.

KPMG LLP, in Dallas, Texas, the Company's auditor since 2011,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated April 1,
2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has substantial
indebtedness classified within current liabilities that raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.

Monitronics said "We have engaged financial and legal advisors to
advise us regarding potential alternatives to address the issues
described above.  There can be no assurance that any such potential
alternatives or restructuring transactions will be possible on
acceptable terms, if at all.  We may not be able to come to an
arrangement that is acceptable to all of our stakeholders.  Our
failure to reach an arrangement on the terms of a restructuring
with our stakeholders would have a material adverse effect on our
liquidity, financial condition and results of operations, including
requiring us to potentially file a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in order to
implement a restructuring plan."

The Company's report on Form 10-K is available from the SEC's
website at https://is.gd/iJVLzP.

                           About Monitronics

Farmers Branch, Texas-based Monitronics International, Inc. --
http://www.mymoni.com/-- provides residential customers and
commercial client accounts with monitored home and business
security systems, as well as interactive and home automation
services.  The Company is supported by a network of independent
Authorized Dealers providing products and support to customers in
the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico.  Its wholly owned
subsidiary, LiveWatch is a Do-It-Yourself home security firm,
offering professionally monitored security services through a
direct-to-consumer sales channel.  Monitronics is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Ascent Capital Group, Inc. Monitroics was
incorporated in the state of Texas on Aug. 31, 1994.  At Dec. 31,
2018, Monitronics had over 1,190 full-time employees and over 40
part-time employees.


MR TORTILLA: DMFP Objects to Disclosure Statement
-------------------------------------------------
Diana's Mexican Food Products, Inc., objects to the Disclosure
Statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan filed by Mr. Tortilla,
Inc.

DMFP complains that the Debtor does not disclose the extent of
so-called "unsecured claims" held by family members of its
insiders.  According to DMFP, it appears that not less than
$260,000 (30%) of the purported "unsecured creditors" of this
Debtor's estate are, in fact, family members of the Alcazars.

DMFP points out that the Debtor's only attempt to determine the
value of its assets appears to have been limited to the
self-serving declaration of its equity owner, Ronald Alcazar, who
did "online research" to determine the value of the Debtor's
assets.

DMFP further points out that the Disclosure Statement also misleads
the estate's creditors about DMFP's claims. DMFP asserts that the
Debtor states that it is "investigating" whether it will object to
DMFP's claims, but the Disclosure Statement fails to disclose to
creditors what the basis for such an objection would be, what the
administrative costs of such an objection would likely be, or what
the impact of the claim objection would be on the estate and its
distributions to creditors, either in costs to the estate or what
benefit such an objection would be to the estate's creditors.

According to DMFP it appears that the primary motive of the Plan
(if not the sole motive) is to prevent Creditor from collecting
upon its judgment while permitting the owners of the Debtor
(Anthony Alcazar and Ronald Alcazar) to retain their ownership
stake and, therefore, any "upside" in the Debtor after it
reorganizes without having repaid its unsecured creditors.

DMFP complains that it appears that the Debtor intends to "recoup"
any unclaimed distributions for itself, rather than re-distributing
unpaid funds to remaining unsecured creditors.

Attorneys for Diana's Mexican Food Products, Inc.:

     Marsha A. Houston, Esq.
     Christopher O. Rivas, Esq.
     REED SMITH LLP
     355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900
     Los Angeles, CA 90071-1514
     Tel: 213.457.8000
     Fax: 213.457.8080

        -- and --

     Bernard P. Simons, Esq.
     REED SMITH LLP
     1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 700
     Los Angeles, CA 90067-6009
     Tel: 310.734.5200
     Fax: 310.734.5299

                     About Mr. Tortilla

Mr. Tortilla, Inc., is a manufacturer of traditional flour tortilla
(fresh or refrigerated) in San Fernando, California.  Mr. Tortilla
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-12051) on
Aug. 14, 2018.  In the petition signed by Anthony Alcazar,
president, the Debtor estimated $100,000 to $500,000 in assets and
$1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  The case is assigned to
Judge Victoria S. Kaufman.  Jonathan M. Hayes, Esq., at Resnik
Hayes Moradi LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


NATIONAL AUTO: Plan Solicitation Period Extended Until May 31
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida
extended the period during which National Auto Lenders, Inc. has
the exclusive right to solicit acceptances for its Chapter 11 plan
of reorganization through May 31.

The company and the unsecured creditors' committee appointed in its
bankruptcy case jointly filed a reorganization plan on April 1.

                      About National Auto Lenders

National Auto Lenders, Inc. -- http://www.nalenders.com/-- is a
non-prime auto finance company that purchases loans from auto
dealers.  It has been established for more than 20 years and buys
loans in multiple states.  National Auto Lenders is headquartered
in Miami, Florida.

National Auto Lenders, Inc., filed a voluntary petition for relief
under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Case No. 18-24586) on Nov. 23, 2018. In the petition signed by
Dania Ramos-Infante, vice president, CFO, and COO, the Debtor
estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets and $50 million to
$100 million in liabilities.  Judge Laurel M. Isicoff presides over
the case.  Berger Singerman LLP, led by Paul Steven  Singerman, is
the Debtor's counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 on Dec. 4, 2018, appointed nine
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case.  The committee retained Paul J. Battista,
Esq., and the law firm of Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A., as
counsel; and Soneet Kapila, CPA and the firm of KapilaMukamal, LLP,
as financial advisors.


NATIONAL AUTO: Plan Solicitation Period Extended Until May 31
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida
extended the period during which National Auto Lenders, Inc. has
the exclusive right to solicit acceptances for its Chapter 11 plan
of reorganization through May 31.

The company and the unsecured creditors' committee appointed in its
bankruptcy case jointly filed a reorganization plan on April 1.

                      About National Auto Lenders

National Auto Lenders, Inc. -- http://www.nalenders.com/-- is a
non-prime auto finance company that purchases loans from auto
dealers.  It has been established for more than 20 years and buys
loans in multiple states.  National Auto Lenders is headquartered
in Miami, Florida.

National Auto Lenders, Inc., filed a voluntary petition for relief
under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Case No. 18-24586) on Nov. 23, 2018. In the petition signed by
Dania Ramos-Infante, vice president, CFO, and COO, the Debtor
estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets and $50 million to
$100 million in liabilities.  Judge Laurel M. Isicoff presides over
the case.  Berger Singerman LLP, led by Paul Steven  Singerman, is
the Debtor's counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 on Dec. 4, 2018, appointed nine
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case.  The committee retained Paul J. Battista,
Esq., and the law firm of Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A., as
counsel; and Soneet Kapila, CPA and the firm of KapilaMukamal, LLP,
as financial advisors.


NGL ENERGY: Fitch Gives B/RR4 Rating to New Unsec. Notes Due 2026
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings assigns a 'B'/'RR4' rating to NGL Energy Partner LP's
(NGL) proposed offering of senior unsecured notes due 2026. The
notes are to be co-issued by NGL Energy Finance Corp. (NGL Energy
Finance), which also has a rating of 'B'/'RR4' for the proposed new
unsecured notes. The proposed notes are to rank pari passu with all
existing and future senior unsecured debt. Proceeds from the bond
offering are to be used to reduce borrowings on the secured
revolving credit facility.

NGL has a 'B' Issuer Default Rating (IDR), which is supported by
the partnership's strategy to operate with strong distribution
coverage and diverse operations which are located throughout the
U.S. Both NGL and NGL Energy Finance have a 'B'/'RR4' rating for
the senior unsecured debt. The Recovery Rating of 'RR4' reflects
Fitch's expectations of average recovery prospects in the range of
31% to 50% in the event of a default. NGL Energy Finance is the
co-issuer of all of the senior unsecured debt.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Transactions Modestly Increasing Leverage: In March 2019, NGL sold
Class C 9.625% fixed-to-floating perpetual preferreds for net
proceeds of $38 million. If the underwriters exercise the right for
additional preferreds, net proceeds to NGL will be $44 million.
Proceeds from the offering will initially be used to repay the
secured revolver. Separately, NGL agreed to spend $100 million to
redeem $90 million of its 10.75% Class A convertible preferreds
that are owned by Oaktree Capital Management L.P. Once the $90
million of the preferreds are redeemed, there will be $150 million
of the Class A preferreds outstanding. Fitch notes that the Class A
preferreds received 50% debt credit so by using traditional debt to
redeem the preferreds units, NGL is modestly increasing leverage.
Previously, Fitch expected leverage for the end of FY20 to be in
the low to mid 5x area. Now Fitch expects NGL's leverage to end
FY20 in the mid to high 5x range.

Asset Sales and Acquisitions: In February 2019, NGL sold water
assets for $239 million. Proceeds were used to fund the $90 million
acquisition of the wholesale propane business from DCP Midstream,
LP. In addition, proceeds from the water assets were used to
partially fund $339 million of the senior unsecured notes that were
redeemed on March 15, 2019. NGL has a history of being very
acquisitive and Fitch would expect the partnership to continue to
be an aggressive acquirer of assets. Recently, most of NGL's focus
has been on its water solutions segment.

Amendment Allows for Share Repurchases: Effective with the 7th
Amendment dated Feb. 6, 2019, NGL is permitted to purchase up to
$150 million of its common units (through the duration of the bank
agreement, which ends in October 2021). No more than $50 million a
quarter can be purchased. This is allowed provided that the bank
definition of leverage (which excludes working capital borrowings
and has numerous other adjustments) is less than 3.25x and that
availability on the revolver is $200 million or more.

Plans for Growth: With retail propane divested, NGL now intends to
focus its capital on water solutions and crude oil logistics. NGL
would like crude logistics to account for 35% of EBITDA, water
solutions to account for 35%, refined products/renewables 10% to
15%, and liquids 15% to 20%. For water solutions, NGL previously
announced it intended to add 300,000 barrels per day (bpd) by the
end of FY19. At the end of FY18, the partnership was processing
950,000 bpd and as of Dec. 31, 2018 total volumes averaged 998,524
bpd. Water assets were sold in the Bakken for $91 million in
December 2018 and in the Permian in February 2019 for $239 million.
It is unclear what volumes were associated with the disposed
assets, but volumes look like they will fall short of prior
expectations.

In crude logistics, NGL targets 10% annual EBITDA growth from its
current assets through the end of FY21. Fitch notes that these
targets may be overly optimistic and that management has a history
of falling short of its goals for growth despite significant
spending.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

NGL Energy Partners is somewhat unique in Fitch's rated midstream
universe and it does not have any direct peers. Its focus on water
solutions makes it unusual however its focus on crude logistics,
liquids and refined products is not. It is diversified in a
different way than similarly rated Martin Midstream Partners LP
(MMLP; B). MMLP is focused on a mix of natural gas services, sulfur
services, terminalling and storage and marine transportation. While
NGL is much larger than MMLP, NGL has a history of being an
aggressive acquirer of assets whereas MMLP has not been as
aggressive.

NGL is rated lower than NuStar Energy Partners LP (NuStar; BB),
which is focused on crude pipelines and storage. Importantly,
NuStar generates more stable operating cash flow and operates in a
much more conservative fashion than NGL. NuStar has also been less
aggressive with acquisitions than NGL.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  - Revenues continue to increase as NGL benefits from higher
volumes associated with stronger crude prices;

  - Revenues and cash flows also increase given NGL's spending for
growth and acquisitions;

  - EBITDA in FY19 is close to management's public guidance of $450
million.

For the Recovery Rating, Fitch utilized a going-concern approach
with a 6.0x EBITDA multiple, which is in line with recent
reorganization multiples for the energy sector. There have been
limited bankruptcy and reorganizations within the midstream space
but two recent bankruptcies, Azure Midstream and Southcross Holdco,
had multiples between 5.0x and 7.0x by Fitch's best estimates. In
its recent Bankruptcy Case Study Report "Energy, Power and
Commodities Bankruptcies Enterprise Value and Creditor Recoveries"
published in March 2018, the median enterprise valuation exit
multiple for the 29 energy cases for which this was available was
6.7x, with a wide range.

For the going concern EBITDA, Fitch assumed $350 million in FY2020.
The $350 million reflects a discount to Fitch's Base Case
assumption of EBITDA, which reflects dispositions as well as
acquisitions and organic growth. In this scenario, Fitch assumed a
default occurred due to lower crude oil and refined product prices
that would have a direct impact on NGL's profitability. In Fitch's
Stress Case scenario, Fitch assumed NGL had $350 million of EBITDA
in FY2020 and projects that would result in bank defined total
leverage being above 6.5x which would breach this covenant which
does not allow total leverage to exceed 6.0x.

Fitch assumed that 75% of the working capital facility was drawn at
its maximum capacity of $1.7 billion (reflecting it's a $1.3
billion facility that can have up to $400 million allocated from
the acquisition facility) and the acquisition facility was fully
utilized at its capacity which would then be $65 million. With
these assumptions, the Recovery Rating for the senior unsecured
debt was 'RR4' which represents average recovery prospects in the
range of 31% to 50%. Fitch also ran recovery scenarios with 75% of
the working capital facility drawn at $900 million ($1.3 billion
less $400 million reallocated to the acquisition facility) and the
acquisition facility fully drawn at $865 billion and the Recovery
Rating for the senior unsecured was 'RR5'. Fitch believes that NGL
will continue to have the working capital facility capacity
allocated toward the high end, particularly if there was an event
of default. Therefore the first recovery scenario described remains
the Fitch recovery case with an outcome of 'RR4' for the senior
unsecured debt.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  - The rating may be upgraded if NGL can achieve leverage below 6x
on a sustained basis;

  - Evidence of improved capital discipline.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  - Leverage above 6.0x on a sustained basis, or evidence that
management is not prudent with capital;

  - Inability for NGL to reach its public guidance of EBITDA of
$450 million in FY19;

  - Significant capital spending or acquisition activity financed
in a manner that is detrimental to the credit profile (e.g., if not
funded with a balance of debt and equity);

  - Negative regulatory or legislative action which cause
volumetric declines and reduces profitability lower and leverage
higher on a sustained basis;

  - Reduced liquidity.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity Adequate: As of Dec. 31, 2018, NGL had $23 million of
cash on the balance sheet. It also had a $1.765 billion secured
bank facility with $1.25 billion of the total directed to the
working capital facility (which is restricted by a borrowing base),
and $515 million directed to the acquisition facility. NGL can
reallocate up to $400 million of either facility to the other
facility. As of Dec. 31, 2018, NGL had $889 million drawn on the
working capital facility (as well as $158 million of letters of
credit on the working capital facility). The bank facility expires
in October 2021.

The bank agreement was amended in February 2019. Maximum total
leverage cannot exceed 6.5x for the quarters ending March 31, 2019
and June 30, 2019. It cannot exceed 6.25x for the quarters ending
Sept. 30, 2019 and Dec. 31, 2019. Beyond then, it cannot exceed
6.0x. Previously, total leverage could not be greater than 6.5x
indicating that lenders have somewhat tightened this covenant
(which was first introduced for the quarter ending March 31, 2019).
NGL has indicated that the bank definition of total leverage was
4.9x as of Dec. 31, 2018. It expects it to be under 4.5x at the end
of FY19.

The bank agreement was modified in May 2018 to provide a temporary
relief for the interest coverage ratio for March 31, 2018. The
interest coverage ratio must be greater than 2.75x at the end of
any quarter. As of Dec. 31, 2019 this was the tightest covenant
since NGL's coverage ratio was calculated to be 3.18x. In May 2018,
the total leverage covenant was also added (which is different from
the "leverage" covenant since it adds the debt from the working
capital facility).

In addition to the bank agreement having borrowing base
restrictions on the working capital revolver, financial covenants
do not allow "leverage" (as defined by the bank agreement which
excludes any borrowings on the working capital facility) to exceed
4.75x at quarter end through Dec. 31, 2018. Thereafter, it cannot
exceed 4.5x. As of Dec. 31, 2018 the bank definition of leverage
was 3.0x. The bank agreement has an additional financial covenant
that does not allow the senior secured leverage ratio to exceed
3.5x. As of year-end 2018, this was 0.01x and NGL's financial
covenant with the most headroom.

The bank definition of debt excludes the working capital borrowings
and letters of credit for the leverage calculation. Working capital
borrowings are significant and were $889 million as of Dec. 31,
2018. On the same date, letters of credit were $158 million. NGL
gets pro forma EBITDA credit for acquisitions and material
projects. Pro forma EBITDA credit for material projects or
acquisitions is typical for master limited partnership (MLP) bank
agreements.

NGL does not have any significant debt maturities until 2023 when
$607 million of senior unsecured notes come due.

On May 13, 2019, NGL's $240 million of 10.75% convertible
preferreds issued to OakTree Capital Management L.P. can be
converted to common units (the third anniversary since the
securities were issued). There were nearly 20 million units issued
and 4.4 million warrants. Currently, 1.5 million warrants are
outstanding and expire in 2024. NGL repurchased $15 million of the
warrants in April 2018.

FULL LIST OF RATINGS

Fitch rates NGL and NGL Energy Finance as follows:

NGL Energy Partners LP

  -- Long-term IDR 'B';

  -- Senior unsecured 'B/RR4'.

NGL Energy Finance Corp.

  -- Senior unsecured 'B/RR4'.

The Outlook is Stable.


NOWELL TREE: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended Until May 7
--------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Madeleine Wanslee granted Nowell Tree Farm,
LLC's third request to extend the period during which the company
has the exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan through May 7,
and to solicit acceptances for the plan through July 8.

                      About Nowell Tree Farm

Nowell Tree Farm, LLC, operates a nursery growing, developing and
selling trees, shrubs, cactus and palms primarily on a wholesale
basis to landscapers, contractors and nurseries.

Nowell Tree Farm sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 18-08022) on July 9,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
$10 million to $50 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million. Judge Madeleine C. Wanslee oversees the case.  Burch &
Cracchiolo PA, led by Alan A. Meda, serves as the Debtor's counsel;
and Steven Stein as its accountant.



NSC WHOLESALE: Has Until May 22 to Exclusively File Chapter 11 Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Kevin Carey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware extended the period during which NSC Wholesale Holdings,
LLC and its affiliates have the exclusive right to file a Chapter
11 plan through May 22, and to solicit acceptances for the plan
through July 22.

                      About NSC Wholesale

NSC Wholesale Holdings and its subsidiaries --
https://www.nwlshop.com/ -- own and operate a chain of 11 general
merchandise close-out stores located in four states: Massachusetts,
New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania.  The Stores, which operate
under the name "National Wholesale Liquidators," are targeted to
lower and lower/middle income customers in densely populated urban
and suburban markets.  At October 2018, the Company had 695
employees, 629 of whom are employed on a full time basis and 66 of
whom are employed part time.  

On Oct. 24, 2018, NSC Wholesale and six of its subsidiaries filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-12394).
In the petition signed by CEO Scott Rosen, the Debtors estimated
assets and liabilities at $10 million to $50 million.

Hon. Kevin J. Carey oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; Getzler Henrich & Associates LLC and SSG Advisors LLC as
financial advisor and investment banker; and Omni Management Group
Inc. as claims & noticing agent.



OKLAHOMA PROCURE: Has Until July 15 to Exclusively File Plan
------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Mary F. Walrath extended the period during
which Oklahoma ProCure Management, LLC has the exclusive right to
file a Chapter 11 plan through July 15, and to solicit acceptances
for the plan through Sept. 15.

                 About Oklahoma ProCure Management

Oklahoma ProCure Management, LLC -- https://www.procure.com/ --
operates the ProCure Proton Therapy Center in Oklahoma City that
utilizes proton therapy for treatment of cancer.

Oklahoma ProCure sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 18-12622) on Nov. 15, 2018.  In the petition signed by James J.
Loughlin, Jr., VP/assistant treasurer, the Debtor estimated assets
of $10 million to $50 million and liabilities of $100 million to
$500 million.  Judge Mary F. Walrath presides over the case.  

The Debtor tapped Gregory W. Werkheiser, Esq., of Morris, Nichols,
Arsht & Tunnell LLP, as general counsel; and JND Corporate
Restructuring as its claims and noticing agent.

Andrew R. Vara, the Acting United States Trustee for Region 3,
appointed Deborah Burian as the Patient Care Ombudsman for Oklahoma
ProCure Management, LLC.



ONE BLUESKY: Case Summary & 9 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: One BlueSky Investments, LLC
        P.O. Box 1207
        Wake Forest, NC 27588-0506

Business Description: One BlueSky Investments is a privately held
                      company that is engaged in activities
                      related to real estate.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of North Carolina
       (Raleigh Division)

Case No.: 19-01439

Judge: Hon. Stephani W. Humrickhouse

Debtor's Counsel: J.M. Cook, Esq.
                  J.M. COOK, P.A.
                  5886 Faringdon Place, Suite 100
                  Raleigh, NC 27609
                  Tel: 919 675-2411
                  Email: J.M.Cook@jmcookesq.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $500,000 to $1 million

The petition was signed by Sainte Deon Robinson, managing member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's nine unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/nceb19-01439.pdf


OPTICAL HOLDINGS: Exclusive Filing Period Extended to May 24
------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Stacey Meisel extended the period during
which Optical Holdings of Puerto Rico, LLC and OHI of Puerto Rico,
LLC have the exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan through May
24, and to solicit acceptances for the plan through July 22.

               About Optical Holdings of Puerto Rico

Optical Holdings of Puerto Rico, LLC, owns health and personal care
stores.  OHI of Puerto Rico, LLC is an eyewear supplier in
Springfield, New Jersey.

Optical Holdings and OHI sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case Nos. 18-29070 and 18-29071) on
Sept. 25, 2018.  At the time of the filing, Optical Holdings
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of $1 million
to $10 million.  OHI estimated assets of less than $1 million and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Stacey L. Meisel
presides over the cases.  The Debtors tapped Greenberg Traurig LLP
as their legal counsel.



ORGANIC POWER: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Organic Power LLC
        267 Sierra Morena Street
        PM 632
        San Juan, PR 00926

Business Description: Organic Power LLC --
                      https://prrenewables.com -- is a supplier of
                      renewable energy and a provider of
                      environmentally sustainable food waste
                      recycling services based in Puerto Rico.
                      Organic Power offers food processing
                      companies, restaurants, pharmaceuticals and
                      retail outlets an alternative to landfill
                      disposal; a low cost & environmentally
                      friendly recycling option.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Puerto Rico (Old San Juan)

Case No.: 19-01789

Debtor's Counsel: Aimee I. Lopez Pabon, Esq.
                  GODREAU & GONZALEZ, LLC
                  PO BOX 9024176
                  San Juan, PR 00902
                  Tel: 787-726-0077
                  Email: al@g-glawpr.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Miguel E. Perez, president.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb19-01789.pdf


PACKERS HOLDINGS: Fitch Alters Outlook on 'B-' LT IDR to Positive
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Packers Holdings, LLC's (PKR) Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B-'. Fitch has also affirmed the
long- term ratings on the company's senior 1st lien secured term
loan and revolver at 'B+'/'RR1'. The Rating Outlook has been
revised to Positive from Stable.

PKR's Long-Term IDR is supported by its strong cash flow
generation, leading market position as the largest contract
sanitation company serving the food processing industry in North
America, and the high degree of regulation within the markets in
which it operates. The rating is further supported by the company's
consistent and expanding profit margins and long-held, blue-chip
customer relationships. These positive factors are offset by PKR's
customer concentration, and the company's elevated leverage and
aggressive financial policy.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The Outlook revision to Positive from Stable reflects PKR's
improved credit metrics and margins since year-end 2017, as well as
the company's strong execution since that time. These trends,
combined with the company's market position, stable cash flow
generation, and operating profile, could result in an upgrade if
they are sustained. Fitch recognizes the risk that PKR's private
equity ownership could potentially drive aggressive shareholder
activities over the medium-to-long term; however, this scenario is
not part of Fitch's base case for the company. Customer
concentration will likely remain a concern over the next few years,
although expansion into new end-markets could broaden the company's
exposure over time.

Strong Market Position: As the largest contract sanitation company
for the food-processing industry in North America, PKR has a
limited set of competitors that can fully service large plants or
quickly relocate resources to address customer needs. The
industrial food preparation segment is highly fragmented across the
U.S. and Canada with a large concentration of closely held regional
players; however, PKR is nearly three times the size (by location)
of its closest competitor, The Vincent Group-QSI.

Bolt-on Acquisitions Likely: Despite being the largest firm in the
industry, PKR believes there is ample greenfield opportunity
through further penetration into additional plants of existing
customers or through acquisition, as the firm has completed several
acquisitions in the past five years, typically with a size of
roughly $10 million to $30 million. Fitch expects this will remain
part of PKR's overall strategy over the next several years,
particularly as the company aims to expand in geographies and
end-markets where it is currently less exposed.

Strong Profitability, FCF: Fitch considers PKR's stable margins,
growing revenue base, and strong FCF to be more commensurate with a
higher rating than 'B-'. The company has generated positive FCF
over the last several years, and Fitch expects this to continue
through 2021. The company has implemented and executed on several
cost cutting initiatives over the past two to three years,
particularly in regards to training and employee retention. Fitch
expects these initiatives will result in EBITDA margins remaining
steady over the rating horizon.

Necessity of Service: Fitch also believes the company's rating is
supported by its clear position within the market. All U.S. protein
plants are USDA-inspected daily prior to opening. Protein plants
must pass these daily inspections or be subject to fines, citations
and production delays with costs running in the tens of thousands
of dollars per hour. In addition, non-protein plants are regularly
reviewed by the FDA with end-customers such as Walmart, McDonalds
and Subway driving higher sanitation standards.

Fitch believes such standards and regulations are increasing,
further strengthening PKR's position and expanding the available
opportunities for the company. Fitch assess PKR's function as
mission-critical for its customers such as JBS or Cargill as
opposed to other plant production costs that may be delayed such as
maintenance or capex for machinery. Sanitation usually represents
less than 5% of a customer's plant's cost structure.

Positive Industry Trends: PKR's credit risk is somewhat reduced by
several current broad markets trends that are likely to continue
over the medium-term. Fitch notes that as the grocery segment
continues to see pricing pressure from online retailers, both
protein and non-protein producers will seek to further streamline
production by outsourcing additional functions such as human
resources and sanitation. Fitch believes that human resources is a
core competency of PKR as the company has over 16,000 full-time
employees, no union representation and employee turnover that is
below industry average.

An additional source of demand is the increased regulatory
complexity across various food categories coupled with increasingly
unannounced FDA audits. Finally, PKR notes that the growing
presence of automation in the food processing arena has in many
cases led to increased demand for sanitation services as a growing
number of mechanical components need to be disassembled, sanitized
and reassembled by its trained staff.

Customer Concentration: Fitch considers PKR's customer
concentration to be one of its more material concerns. Fitch
estimates the company's top five customers comprise approximately
half of the company's revenue. The loss of any of these top
customers would significantly impact the company's financial
performance and subsequently its credit profile. PKR's strong
market position offsets some of Fitch's concerns, while the
concentration is also somewhat mitigated by the fact that these
relationship are spread out across dozens of unique plants that
have discrete plant managers, each responsible for plant
performance and regulatory compliance, who decide to employ PKR's
services.

Additionally, contracts are typically negotiated on a
plant-by-plant basis, rather than on a corporate level, though
corporate relationships can impact broader wins, renewals, and
losses. They typically have very high renewal rates, which Fitch
expects to be above 95% on average.

Elevated Leverage: Fitch considers PKR's leverage (lease-adjusted
debt/EBITDAR) to be another significant factor when considering the
company's rating. PKR's metrics are generally in line with other
companies at a similar 'B-' rating. Fitch expects leverage to
remain elevated around or above 6.0x over the next few years;
however, the company would exceed Fitch's expectations if there
were any material voluntary debt repayments, or if the required
repayments from the term loan's excess cash flow sweep were in
excess of $50 million in aggregate through 2020. The agency does
not forecast the company making any material voluntary debt
prepayments. Fitch cites that the company's consistent
profitability, long-standing customer relationships and
mission-critical nature as mitigants to elevated leverage.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

PKR compares favorably to its (industry) peers in terms of cash
flow generation, strategy and profitability. In particular, Fitch
considers the company's FCF margins and stable margins to be
exceptional compared to similar-rated companies. Fitch also
considers PKR to be differentiated from its other 'B-' rated peers
due to its strong market position within its segment. Many other
companies in the 'B' category operate in highly fragmented markets
with minimal competitive advantage. The company's rating is
somewhat limited due to its leverage, which is high, but relatively
in line with similarly rated companies. There are no parent
subsidiary, country ceiling, or operating environment influences or
constraints on this rating.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  -- Cash deployment is directed toward re-investment in the
company or modest debt reduction over the rating horizon, with no
material cash used for leveraging transactions such as a dividend
recapitalization;

  -- Fiscal 2018 results are largely consistent with the company's
preliminary 2018 results;

  -- Low double-digit revenue growth in 2019, partially driven by a
small acquisition the company completed around the start of the
year, coupled with mid-single digit organic growth;

  -- Low-to-mid single digit organic growth in 2020 and 2021,
coupled with modest bolt-on acquisitions;

  -- Acquisitions of between $20 million and $30 million per year
from 2019 to 2021;

  -- EBITDA margins stable throughout forecast with increased
marketing and corporate expenses offset by effects of improved
employee training, employee retention and cost savings
initiatives;

  -- Minimal capex of less than 1% of total revenue;

  -- Company reinstitutes a small common dividend over the next one
to two years;

  -- Other investing and financing cash costs relating to
recapitalization and transaction costs.

Recovery Analysis

The recovery analysis assumes Packers Holdings would be reorganized
rather than liquidated, and would be considered on a going concern
(GC). Fitch has assumed a 10% administrative claim in the recovery
analysis.

In Fitch's recovery analysis, potential default is assumed to come
from a combination of one or more of the following: a prolonged
economic downturn leads to one or more major customers to close a
significant number of facilities; customers shifting to insource a
high percentage of currently outsourced contracts; or loss of more
than one of the company's major customers.

Fitch's recovery assumptions reflects the equivalent of PKR losing
one of its top two customers along with at least one of its
remaining top five customers, resulting in a revenue and EBITDA
decline of approximately 25% compared to Fitch's rating case, while
margins also decline modestly.

Fitch expects the EV multiple used in Packers' recovery analysis
will be approximately 6.5x. Fitch believes the company's business
profile and market position are strong, despite the highly
leveraged capital structure. PKR has consistently generated
positive FCF and stable margins, while growing organically. Fitch's
EV multiple also considers the approximately 13x transaction
multiple when Leonard Green (sponsor) purchased Packers in 2014.

The $50 million senior first lien secured revolving credit facility
is assumed to be fully drawn upon default. The revolver and senior
first lien secured term loan are senior to the senior unsecured
notes in the waterfall.

The waterfall results in a recovery between 71% and 90% for the
senior first lien revolver and term loan, corresponding to a
Recovery Rating of 'RR2'.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- Lease adjusted leverage (adjusted debt/EBITDAR) below 6.5x for
a sustained period;

  -- FFO Adjusted leverage below 6.5x for a sustained period;

  -- FFO Fixed Charge Coverage above 2.5x for a sustained period;

  -- Shift to a consistently conservative financial policy.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- Lease adjusted leverage consistently above 7.5x;

  -- Multiple consecutive periods of negative FCF;

  -- FFO Fixed Charge Coverage sustained below 1.5x;

  -- Loss of a major customer.

LIQUIDITY

Adequate Liquidity: PKR had adequate liquidity at the end of 2018,
comprised of cash on the balance sheet coupled with revolver
availability. The company has a relatively nimble operating
structure and minimal annual maintenance capital expenditures. Its
liquidity is also supported by the company's positive FCF
generation, which Fitch expects to continue over the rating
horizon. Fitch does not consider any of the company's cash to be
restricted, and it does not believe the company requires a material
cash balance to sustain operations given its nimble operating
structure and minimal fixed costs.

The company's debt structure as of January 1, 2018 consists of a
$50 million revolving credit facility, $600 million senior 1st lien
term loan B, and $275 million of senior unsecured notes. The TLB
amortizes at 1% per year and matures in 2024, and the notes are due
in 2025. Fitch considers the company's capital structure and
maturity schedule to be favorable.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Packers Holdings, LLC

  - Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B-';

  - Senior 1st Lien Secured Revolver at 'B+'/'RR2';

  - Senior 1st Lien Secured Term Loan at 'B+'/'RR2';

The Rating Outlook is Positive.


PANAGIOTIS NASSIOS: $380K Sale of Holliston Property to Faria OK'd
------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts
authorized Panagiotis C. Nassios' private sale of the real property
located at 208 Prospect Street, Holliston, Massachusetts, to Faria
Realty Trust for $380,000, cash, subject to sale leaseback.

There have been no objections filed or higher and better offers
submitted.  The Court cancelled the hearing on the Motion set for
March 26, 2019.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances.
Any perfected, enforceable valid liens will attach to the proceeds
of the sale.  

Panagiotis C. Nassios sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Mass.
Case No. 18-42302) on Dec. 14, 2018.  The Debtor tapped Michael Van
Dam, Esq., at Van Dam Law LLP, as counsel.


PARIS MANAGEMENT: First Security Objects to Plan Confirmation
-------------------------------------------------------------
First Security Bank objects to confirmation of the Chapter 11 Plan
filed by Paris Management, LLC.

The Creditor complains that despite the Debtor's statement that
Bank is fully secured, the treatment provided to Bank's claim in
Class 2 leaves it impaired inasmuch as the proposed treatment does
not (a) address Bank's entitlement to fees, costs or charges
provided for in the Note and Deed of Trust which are allowable
under Section 506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code; or (b) the retention
by Bank of its liens securing the obligations under the Note and
Deed of Trust.

The Creditor points out that the Plan alters Lender's "legal,
equitable, [or] contractual rights" and the Bank is impaired unless
the Plan proposes to provide for the Bank's retention of its lien
and to pay Bank's fees, costs and charges provided for in the Note
and Deed of Trust.

The Creditor further points out that the Plan does not provide that
Bank will retain its lien on the Property.

According to Creditor, the Disclosure Statement provides no
analysis or historical operating results for the Debtor's business
and Bank cannot determine whether the Projections are realistic or
whether the Plan is feasible.

The Creditor asserts that the Plan does to specify the length of
the payments to be provided raising an ambiguity as to whether the
Plan proposes only to make payments for a period of 24 months or
whether the payments will continue to be made until the allowed
claims are paid in full.

The Creditor further complains that the Disclosure Statement
provides no analysis or historical operating results for the
Debtor's business.

The Creditor points out that the Disclosure Statement provides no
postpetition operating results from which creditors can determine
whether the two (2) years’ worth of Projections provided are
realistic.

Attorneys for First Security Bank:

     James E. Bailey III, Esq.
     6075 Poplar Avenue, Suite 500
     Memphis, TN 38119
     Tel: (901) 680-7347
     Fax: (901) 680-7201
     Email: jeb.bailey@butlersnow.com

                      About Paris Management

Paris Management, LLC, is a Mississippi limited liability company
doing business in Shelby County, Tennessee.  All of its assets are
located in Shelby County, Tennessee.

Paris Management sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 19-20957) on Feb. 1,
2019.  The case is assigned to Judge Paulette J. Delk.  John
Dunlap, Esq., from Memphis, Tennessee, is serving as the Debtor's
counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of Paris Management, LLC as of March 15,
according to a court docket.


PEM FAMILY LIMITED: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
------------------------------------------------------------
No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 cases of The PEM Family Limited Partnership I and
its affiliated debtors as of April 2, according to a court docket.
    
                     About PEM Family Limited

Boca Raton, Fla.-based PEM Family Limited Partnership I and its
affiliates filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Lead Case No. 19-12916) on March 5, 2019.  In the petitions signed
by Philip E. Morgaman, trustee for PEM Family's general partner,
PEM LLC, the Debtors each declared $1 million to $10 million in
assets and $500,000 to $1 million in liabilities.

The case has been assigned to Judge Mindy A. Mora.  Craig A.
Pugatch, Esq., at Rice Pugatch Robinson Storfer & Cohen, PLLC, is
the Debtors' legal counsel.


PHYLLIS HANEY: $167K Sale of Beaver Properties Denied w/o Prejudice
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas P. Agresti of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Pennsylvania denied without prejudice Frye
Transportation Group, Inc.'s purchase of Debtor Phyllis J. Haney's
two real properties: (i) known as 902 Western Avenue, Beaver,
Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel No. 55-032-0100.001 for $102,000; and (ii)
known as 1405 8th Avenue, Beaver, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel No.
55-032-0101.000, pursuant to their commercial lease/option
agreement, dated June 16, 2017, for $65,000.

On March 28, 2019, the Debtor will file a Sale Motion as to the
proposed sale of the Properties to Fyre.

Phyllis J. Haney sought chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case
No. 18-22636) on June 29, 2018.  The Debtor tapped Robert O Lampl,
Esq. , at Robert O Lampl Law Office, as counsel.


PINEY WOODS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------
Two affiliates that have filed voluntary petitions seeking relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

      Debtor                                     Case No.
      ------                                     --------
      Piney Woods Resources, Inc. (Lead Case)    19-01390
      1615 Kent Dairy Road
      Alabaster, AL 35007

      Jesse Creek Mining, LLC                    19-01394
      1615 Kent Dairy Road
      Alabaster, AL 35007

Business Description: Piney Woods and Jesse Creek are engaged in
                      the production and sale of metallurgical
                      grade coal from a mining complex located in
                      Shelby County, Alabama.  Debtor Piney Woods
                      is the parent company of Jesse Creek.  The
                      Jesse Creek mining complex consists of
                      a surface and highwall mining operation, a
                      preparation plant, and an underground mine
                      development project.  Mining and development

                      operations were idled on March 27, 2019.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 2, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Alabama (Birmingham)

Judge: Hon. D. Sims Crawford

Debtors' Counsel:       Lee R. Benton, Esq.
                        Samuel C. Stephens, Esq.
                        BENTON & CENTENO, LLP
                        2019 Third Avenue North
                        Birmingham, Alabama 35203
                        Tel: (205) 278-8000
                        Email: lbenton@bcattys.com
                               sstephens@bcattys.com

                          – and –

                        Mary Elisabeth Naumann, Esq.
                        Chacey R. Malhouitre, Esq.
                        JACKSON KELLY PLLC
                        175 E. Main Street, Ste. 500
                        Lexington, KY 40507
                        Tel: (859) 255-9500
                        Email: mnaumann@jacksonkelly.com
                               chacey.malhouitre@jacksonkelly.

Piney Woods'
Estimated Assets: $100 million to $500 million

Piney Woods'
Estimated Liabilities: $100 million to $500 million

Jesse Creek's
Estimated Assets: $100 million to $500 million

Jesse Creek's
Estimated Liabilities: $100 million to $500 million

The petitions were signed by B. Scott Spears, CEO.

Full-text copies of the petitions are available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb19-01390.pdf
        http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb19-01394.pdf

A. List of Piney Woods' 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Calera Industrial Supply                               $101,628
9300 Hwy 25 S
Calera, AL 35040

2. Drummond Coal Sales, Inc.                              $207,182
P.O. Box 10246
Birmingham, AL 35202

3. Dunn Construction                                      $105,863
P.O. Box 11967
Birmingham, AL 35202

4. Dyno Nobel                                             $150,134
Dept. 2643
P.O. Box 122643
Dallas, TX
75312-2643

5. GMS Mine Repair & Maintenance                          $720,411
P.O. Box 2446
32 Enterprise Drive
Oakland, MD 21550

6. Jamas Technology, Inc.                                 $137,388
1070 Williams Trace
Birmingham, AL 35242

7. Jennmar                                                $132,813
860 North Sandcut Rd
Earlington, KY 42410

8. Jones Machine & Welding                                $114,193
P.O. Box 264
Oakman, AL 35579

9. Joy Global Underground Mining, LLC                     $515,224
P.O. Box 504794
St. Louis, MO
63150-4794

10. Macquarie Corporate and Asset Funding                 $335,249
125 W 55th Street
Level 22
New York, NY 10019

11. McPherson Oil                                         $704,693
5051 Cardinal Street
Trussville, AL 35173

12. National Armature & Machine                           $126,662
P.O. Box 655
Holden, WV 25625

13. Portfolio Advisors VIII, LLC                          $148,195
2935 Country Drive, Suite 102
Little Canada, MN 55117

14. Refab Co., Inc.                                       $175,220
P.O. Box 437
Stollings, WV 25646

15. Tabor Machinery                                        $96,040
1176 Shelter Road
Princeton, WV 24739

16. Thompson Tractor Co., Inc.                            $586,843
PO Box 934005
Atlanta, GA 31193-4005

17. Tractor & Equipment Company                           $611,283
5336 Airport Hwy
Birmingham, AL 35212

18. Triangle Construction, Inc.                           $263,248
P.O. Box 5
Cordova, AL 35550

19. USA Ready Mix, LLC                                    $107,022
P.O. Box 730197
Dallas, TX
75373-0197

20. Warrior Tractor & Equipment                           $352,639
2149 Hwy 31 S
Pelham, AL 35124

B. List of Jesse Creek's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Calera Industrial Supply                               $101,628
9300 Hwy 25 S
Calera, AL 35040

2. Drummond Coal Sales, Inc.                              $207,182
P.O. Box 10246
Birmingham, AL 35202

3. Dunn Construction                                      $105,863
P.O. Box 11967
Birmingham, AL
35202

4. Dyno Nobel                                             $150,134
Dept. 2643
P.O. Box 122643
Dallas, TX
75312-2643

5. GMS Mine Repair & Maintenance                          $720,411
P.O. Box 2446
32 Enterprise Drive
Oakland, MD 21550

6. Jamas Technology, Inc.                                 $137,388
1070 Williams Trace
Birmingham, AL 35242

7. Jennmar                                                $132,813
860 North Sandcut Rd
Earlington, KY 42410

8. Jones Machine & Welding                                $114,193
P.O. Box 264
Oakman, AL 35579

9. Joy Global Underground Mining, LLC                     $515,224
P.O. box 504794
St. Louis, MO
63150-4794

10. Macquarie Corporate and Asset Funding                 $335,249
125 W 55th Street
Level 22
New York, NY 10019

11. McPherson Oil                                         $704,693
5051 Cardinal Street
Trussville, AL 35173

12. National Armature & Machine                           $126,662
P.O. Box 655
Holden, WV 25625

13. Portfolio Advisors VIII, LLC                          $148,195
2935 Country Drive
Suite 102
Little Canada, MN 55117

14. Refab Co, Inc.                                        $175,220
P.O. Box 437
Stollings, WV 25646

15. Tabor Machinery                                        $96,040
1176 Shelter Road
Princeton, WV 24739

16. Thompson Tractor Co., Inc.                            $586,843
PO Box 934005
Atlanta, GA 31193-4005

17. Tractor & Equipment Company                           $611,283
5336 Airport Hwy
Birmingham, AL 35212

18. Triangle Construction, Inc.                           $263,248
P.O. Box 5
Cordova, AL 35550

19. USA Ready Mix, LLC                                    $107,022
P.O. Box 730197
Dallas, TX 75373-0197

20. Warrior Tractor & Equipment                           $352,639
2149 Hwy 31 S
Pelham, AL 35124


PRAGAT PURSHOTTAM: Substantial Consummation Date Moved to May 2024
------------------------------------------------------------------
Pragat Purshottam, Inc., filed an amended Chapter 11 Plan and
accompanying disclosure statement to amend the time by which the
Plan is expected to be substantially consummated.  The date has
been moved to May 2024 instead of March 2024 as indicated in the
previously filed plan.

Class 4 Claims: General Unsecured Non-Priority Claims (excluding
Class 1, 2 and 3 Claims and the claims of holders of assumed
Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases) shall be classified in
separate sub-paragraphs as Class 4A and Class 4B. Each sub-class
for each of the two holders shall constitute a separate class for
the purpose of voting rights and treatment of its respective
claims, notwithstanding being aggregated herein for the sake of
convenience. Payments to Class 4A and Class 4B shall be made in
pari passu with one another and will be paid pro rata with other
claims within each sub class derived from the internal cash flow
generated by the Reorganized Debtor from the continued operations
of its Church.  Class 4A and 4B claims shall be paid, pro rata,
from the cash flow in four annual payments starting six months
following the Effective Date and continuing quarterly until the
later of the fifth annual anniversary of the Effective Date.

Class 1 Claims: Class 1 Secured Mortgage Claim of Phoenix REO, LLC
(Phoenix). Phoenix is the holder of a mortgage on the Debtor’s
commercial shopping center real property. Phoenix has not filed a
claim. The claim of Phoenix is scheduled by the Debtor on Schedule
D of the Petition in the amount of $1,527,814.25. The secured
portion shall be fixed at the fair market value as per the
appraised value of $350,000.00. This secured claim portion shall be
treated as secured and be paid based upon a 20-year amortization,
at 5.5% per annum with a balloon payment of then due balance to be
made five (5) years after the date of confirmation. The payments of
principal and interest would be $2407.61 per month. At the end of
60 months when the balloon payment is due the principal balance due
would be $294,658.47.

Class 2 Claims: The secured claim of the DuPage County Treasurer.
Property taxes owed by the Debtor to the DuPage County Treasurer
total $70,000.00 and have been sold to a third party. Debtor shall
pay the sum of $1945.00 per month for 36 months to a to be
established tax escrow account for the purposes of redeeming the
property.

Class 5: Claims and Equity Interests.  Class 5 claims shall consist
of the equity security claims and interests in the Debtor, Pragat
Purshottam, Inc. Indu Patel is the 100% owner of equity interests
in the Debtor. She is the spouse of the manager, Nikunj Patel.
Class 5 claims shall be paid 0%. Class 5 claims and interests are
impaired under the Plan and may not participate in balloting. Under
the terms herein, the equity holder shall contribute $60,557.55 in
new capital at the time of confirmation from funds held in escrow
for that purpose. She will also waive any other claims against the
Debtor, if any.

The Plan will be funded with funds realized from the infusion of
capital from the equity security holder, Indu Patel as well as the
operating income from rental income. The prorate distribution shall
be made by the Debtor in Possession after a review of all claims
filed.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 28, 2019,
is available at http://tinyurl.com/y4h3wzx7from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                 About Pragat Purshottam

Pragat Purshottam, Inc., is a real estate company that owns a
commercial property located at 270-280 Glen Ellyn Road,
Bloomingdale, Illinois.  The company valued the property at
$500,000.

Pragat Purshottam sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 18-20221) on July 19,
2018.  In the petition signed by Nikunj Patel, manager, the Debtor
disclosed $505,578 in assets and $1,559,150 in liabilities.  Judge
Carol A. Doyle oversees the case.


PRESCRIPTION ADVISORY: Exclusive Filing Period Extended to July 11
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brendan Shannon of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware extended the period during which Prescription Advisory
Systems & Technology, Inc. has the exclusive right to file a
Chapter 11 plan through July 11, and to solicit acceptances for the
plan through Sept. 9.

                  About Prescription Advisory

Prescription Advisory Systems & Technology, Inc. --
https://pastrx.com/ -- is a privately held company that developed a
prescription software to deal with prescription overdose epidemic.
The Company's product PASTRx is a software that helps doctors treat
patients with chronic pain and reduce the abuse of controlled
substances.  Benefits of PastRx include valuable medical
information at a glance, ability to drill down for more detail,
automatic checks for many patient risks, reduction in clerical
work, and records of compliance.  The company was incorporated in
2013 and is based in Jenkintown, Pennsylvania.

Prescription Advisory Systems & Technology, Inc. sought bankruptcy
protection on November 13, 2018  (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. Case
No. 18-12601).  In the petition signed by Richard G. Bunker, Jr.,
CEO, the Debtor estimated assets of $0 to $50,000 and liabilities
of $1 million to $10 million.  The Debtor tapped Bielli & Klauder,
LLC as general counsel.


REIGN SAPPHIRE: Incurs $2.6 Million Net Loss in 2018
----------------------------------------------------
Reign Sapphire Corporation has filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K reporting a net
loss of $2.62 million on $28,348 of net revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $4.25 million on $38,434
of net revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, Reign Sapphire had $862,049 in total assets,
$4.57 million in total liabilities, and a total shareholders'
deficit of $3.71 million.

Overall, the Company had a decrease in cash flows for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018 of $2,095 resulting from cash used in operating
activities of $286,112, and cash used in investing activities of
$8,452, offset partially by cash provided by financing activities
of $292,469.

For the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, net cash used in operations was
$286,112 compared to net cash used in operations of $400,003 for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  Net cash used in operations was
primarily due to a net loss of $2,620,274 for year ended Dec. 31,
2018, and the change in derivative liabilities of $530,838, offset
primarily by stock based compensation - related party of $2,390,
stock based compensation issued to employees of $7,742, the
estimated fair market value of stock issued for services of
$230,521, depreciation expense of $12,698, amortization expense of
$234,688, accretion of debt discount of $340,216, the loss on
extinguishment of debt of $535,039, the amortization of stock
issued for future services of $13,750, the impairment of long-term
assets of $942,736, and the changes in operating assets and
liabilities of $545,220, primarily due to the increase in accrued
compensation - related party of $203,750, due to related party of
$525,371, prepaid expenses of $1,336, accounts receivable of
$7,634, inventory of $2,545, and other current liabilities of
$11,799, offset partially by the estimated fair value of contingent
payments, net of $8,932, accounts payable of $138,805, and deferred
revenue of $59,478.

For the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, net cash used in investing was
$8,452 compared to net cash used in investing of $79,068 for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  Net cash used in investing activities
was mainly due to purchases of equipment and the acquisition of
intangible assets.

For the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, net cash provided by financing
was $292,469 compared to net cash provided by financing of $339,056
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  The net cash provided by
financing activities in 2018 was primarily due to proceeds from
short-term convertible notes of $250,000, proceeds from short-term
notes of $155,020, and repayments of short-term notes of $112,551.
The net cash provided by financing activities in 2017 was primarily
due to proceeds from short-term convertible notes of $250,005,
proceeds from short-term notes of $149,504, and repayments of
short-term notes of $60,453.

Reign Sapphire said "We expect that our current working capital
position, together with our expected future cash flows from
operations will be insufficient to fund our operations in the
ordinary course of business, anticipated capital expenditures, debt
payment requirements and other contractual obligations for at least
the next twelve months.  However, this belief is based upon many
assumptions and is subject to numerous risks, and there can be no
assurance that we will not require additional funding in the
future.

"We have no present agreements or commitments with respect to any
material acquisitions of other businesses, products, product rights
or technologies or any other material capital expenditures.
However, we will continue to evaluate acquisitions of and/or
investments in products, technologies, capital equipment or
improvements or companies that complement our business and may make
such acquisitions and/or investments in the future.  Accordingly,
we may need to obtain additional sources of capital in the future
to finance any such acquisitions and/or investments.  We may not be
able to obtain such financing on commercially reasonable terms, if
at all.  Due to the ongoing global economic crisis, we believe it
may be difficult to obtain additional financing if needed.  Even if
we are able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue
restrictions on our operations, in the case of debt financing, or
cause substantial dilution for our shareholders, in the case of
equity financing."

Benjamin & Young, LLP, in Anaheim, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification in its report dated April 1, 2019, on the
Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec.
31, 2018, citing that the Company has suffered losses from
operations and cash outflows from operating activities that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.

The Company's report on Form 10-K is available from the SEC's
website at https://is.gd/XLsEDw.

                       About Reign Sapphire

Reign Sapphire Corporation is a Beverly Hills-based,
direct-to-consumer, branded and custom jewelry company with four
niche brands: Reign Sapphires: ethically produced, millennial
targeted sapphire jewelry, Coordinates Collection: custom jewelry,
inscribed with location coordinates commemorating life's special
moments, Le Bloc: classic customized jewelry and ION Collection by
Jen Selter an athleisure jewelry brand.


ROBERT SIMMONS: Case Summary & 14 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Robert Simmons, Jr., DDS, PC
           dba Hinesville Smiles
        P.O. Box 726
        Hinesville, GA 31310

Business Description: Robert Simmons, Jr., DDS, PC owns and
                      operates a dental clinic in Hinesville,
                      Georgia.  It offers an array of dental
                      services, including preventive dentistry,
                      children's dentistry, cosmetic dentistry,
                      and restorative dentistry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Georgia (Savannah)

Case No.: 19-40478

Judge: Hon. Edward J. Coleman III

Debtor's Counsel: J. Michael Hall, Esq.
                  HALL & NAVARRO, LLC
                  5 Oak Street
                  Statesboro, GA 30458
                  Tel: (912) 764-6757
                  Fax: (912) 764-6756
                  Email: mhall@hlg-pc.com
                         mhall@hallnavarro.com

Total Assets: $547,343

Total Liabilities: $2,201,109

The petition was signed by Robert Simmons, Jr., CEO.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 14 unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/gasb19-40478.pdf


ROCK SPRINGS: Exclusive Filing Period Extended Until June 27
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas
extended the period during which Rock Springs Energy Group, LLC has
the exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

In its order, the bankruptcy court extended the exclusive filing
period to June 27 on the condition that such period may be
shortened or terminated upon motion by any party for good cause.

The company needs additional time within which to file a plan until
the exact amount of claim asserted by its secured creditor BH, Inc.
is determined, according to court filings.

                About Rock Springs Energy Group

Rock Springs Energy Group, LLC, operates a crude oil distillation
and storage tank facility in Rock Springs, Wyoming.  The Company
was formed for the purpose of constructing modular technology
systems at key locations to convert readily available feeds into
high quality and highly marketable products.  Its Wyoming Facility
project is designed to process up to 5,000 barrels per day of sweet
crude oil, condensate and related feeds available in Utah, Wyoming
and Colorado.  The feeds are to be processed primarily into paint
solvents, marine diesel, and paraffinic oils.

Rock Springs Energy Group filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D.
Tex. Case No. 18-52772) on Nov. 28, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Alberto Schroeder, manager, the Debtor estimated $10 million to
$50 million in assets and liabilities.  The Hon. Ronald B. King
oversees the case.  The Vasquez Law Firm is counsel to the Debtor.


ROCK SPRINGS: Exclusive Filing Period Extended Until June 27
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas
extended the period during which Rock Springs Energy Group, LLC has
the exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

In its order, the bankruptcy court extended the exclusive filing
period to June 27 on the condition that such period may be
shortened or terminated upon motion by any party for good cause.

The company needs additional time within which to file a plan until
the exact amount of claim asserted by its secured creditor BH, Inc.
is determined, according to court filings.

                About Rock Springs Energy Group

Rock Springs Energy Group, LLC, operates a crude oil distillation
and storage tank facility in Rock Springs, Wyoming.  The Company
was formed for the purpose of constructing modular technology
systems at key locations to convert readily available feeds into
high quality and highly marketable products.  Its Wyoming Facility
project is designed to process up to 5,000 barrels per day of sweet
crude oil, condensate and related feeds available in Utah, Wyoming
and Colorado.  The feeds are to be processed primarily into paint
solvents, marine diesel, and paraffinic oils.

Rock Springs Energy Group filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D.
Tex. Case No. 18-52772) on Nov. 28, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Alberto Schroeder, manager, the Debtor estimated $10 million to
$50 million in assets and liabilities.  The Hon. Ronald B. King
oversees the case.  The Vasquez Law Firm is counsel to the Debtor.


ROCKIES EXPRESS: Moody's Rates New $550MM Sr. Unsec. Notes 'Ba1'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba1 rating to Rockies Express
Pipeline LLC's (REX) proposed $550 million senior unsecured notes
due 2029. REX's other ratings, including its Ba1 Corporate Family
Rating (CFR), Ba1-PD Probability of Default Rating (PDR), and
stable outlook are unchanged. The Ba1 rating on the existing $1.5
billion senior unsecured notes is also unchanged.

The notes are being offered to repay the company's 364-day Term
Loan that was issued to refinance its January 2019 notes.

Assignments:

Issuer: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC

Senior Unsecured Notes, Assigned Ba1 (LGD4)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The proposed unsecured notes, along with REX's existing unsecured
notes, are rated Ba1, the same as the company's CFR. The senior
unsecured notes are rated at the same level as the CFR because the
company's long-term debt, which includes a $150 million revolving
credit facility, is all unsecured.

REX's Ba1 CFR benefits from its fully contracted east-to-west
capacity, and partially contracted post-2019 west-to-east capacity,
which will enable REX to maintain its cash flow coverage of its
debt burden. Moody's projects REX's debt/EBITDA to fall below 3x by
the end of 2019, aided by modestly enhanced cash flows. REX's
debt/EBITDA is projected to rise post-2019, due to potentially
reduced cash flows from its west-to-east capacity contract
expirations, however, this ratio is not likely to rise above 4x.
REX's rating is constrained by its customer base and their credit
quality. The pipeline's customers are almost entirely comprised of
E&P companies, or 'supply-push' customers, that are directly
exposed to commodity prices. The credit quality of this customer
base-- specifically, the east-to-west customers -- is predominantly
speculative-grade rated.

REX's stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that REX will
recontract at least a portion of its uncontracted post-2019
west-to-east capacity and its customer credit quality will not
weaken materially.

REX's ratings could be considered for an upgrade if the company's
customer credit quality improves and a significant portion of its
west-to-east capacity is re-contracted such that the company's
Debt/EBITDA can be sustained below 3.5x.

An increase in financial leverage or a meaningful decrease in
interest coverage could lead to a ratings downgrade. If Debt/EBITDA
approaches 4.5x or significant deterioration in customer credit
quality could also result in downgrade.

The principal methodology used in this rating was Natural Gas
Pipelines published in July 2018.

REX owns a 1,712 mile interstate natural gas pipeline system that
reaches from the Rocky Mountains area of Wyoming and Colorado to
Ohio. It is a key northern bi-directional pipeline with
west-to-east natural gas transportation capacity of 2.0 billion
cubic feet per day (bcf/d) from Meeker, CO to Cheyenne Hub (Zone
1), 1.8 bcf/d capacity from Cheyenne Hub to Clarington, OH (Zone 2
and Zone 3), and 2.6 bcf/d capacity east-to-west from Clarington,
OH to eastern Missouri (Zone 3).


ROSSER RESERVE: Town of Windermere Objects to Plan Confirmation
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Town of Windermere, Florida, a municipal corporation, objects
to confirmation of the Chapter 11 Plan and final approval of the
Disclosure Statement filed by Regal Marine Industries, Inc., for
Rosser Reserve, LLC.

On or about August 13, 2015, Rosser Reserve, LLC, and the Town
entered into the Rosser Reserve Development Agreement.

The Town points out that Regal Marine's Plan and Disclosure
Statement contemplate an auction of each individual lot within the
Property. The Town further points out that the Town's preference is
for a rebuttable and experienced developer with a proven track
record to purchase and complete the entire Project.

The Town complains that the Regal Marine's Plan and Disclosure
Statement fail to provide for any of the outstanding obligations to
the Town under the Agreement and First Amendment to the Agreement.

                   About Rosser Reserve

Rosser Reserve is the fee simple owner of nine real properties in
Windermere, Florida, valued by the company at $9.83 million.

Rosser Reserve, based in Oakland, Florida, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-07730) on Dec. 12, 2017.  In
the petition signed by Sue R. Prosser, its managing member, the
Debtor disclosed $9.83 million in assets and $8.20 million in
liabilities.  The Law Offices of L. William Porter III, P.A.,
serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.  S. Avery Smith, Esq.,
is the Debtor's special real estate counsel. No official committee
of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


SOUTHCROSS ENERGY: Moody's Cuts PDR to D-PD Amid Bankruptcy Filing
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Southcross Energy Partners,
L.P.'s Probability of Default Rating (PDR) to D-PD from Ca-PD
following the announcement that the company filed a petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the state of
Delaware. The company's other ratings were affirmed, including the
Caa3 Corporate Family Rating (CFR), Caa3 senior secured term loan
rating and SGL-4 Speculative Grade Liquidity (SGL) rating. The
rating outlook remains negative.

Shortly after the actions, Moody's will withdraw all of Southcross'
ratings.

Ratings downgraded:

Issuer: Southcross Energy Partners, L.P.

Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to D-PD from Ca-PD

Ratings Affirmed:

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Caa3

Senior Secured Term Loan, Affirmed Caa3 (Changed to LGD2 from
LGD3)

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Affirmed SGL-4

Outlook Actions:

Maintain Negative Outlook

RATINGS RATIONALE

The downgrade of the PDR reflects Southcross' bankruptcy filing on
April 1, 2019. The Caa3 CFR and the Caa3 senior secured ratings
reflect Moody's view on expected recovery.

Southcross is currently in discussions with its lenders and other
stakeholders regarding the terms of its anticipated restructuring
plan, and is exploring various options which may include a sale of
the company, sales of certain assets, or a standalone restructuring
plan. Southcross' current lenders have committed to providing $255
million in debtor-in-possession financing (DIP) to support the
company's operations during the reorganization.

Southcross Energy Partners, LP is a midstream MLP headquartered in
Dallas, Texas.


SOUTHEASTERN GROCERS: Affiliate Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period
------------------------------------------------------------------
An affiliate of Southeastern Grocers, LLC filed a motion with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to extend by six
months the period during which it has the exclusive right to file a
Chapter 11 plan and solicit acceptances for the plan.

In the court filing, Winn-Dixie Warehouse Leasing, LLC proposed to
extend the exclusive filing period to Sept. 27 and the exclusive
solicitation period to Nov. 27.

The extension, if granted by the court, would allow the company to
seek approval for a deal that would resolve its dispute with
CenterPoint Properties Trust concerning their lease contract.  

CenterPoint is the landlord for Winn-Dixie's distribution center in
Miami, Florida.  

Winn-Dixie said its dispute with the landlord is the only remaining
issue in its bankruptcy case.  Following approval of the settlement
agreement, the company  will proceed towards confirmation of its
prepackaged Chapter 11 plan.

                    About Southeastern Grocers

Southeastern Grocers, LLC, (SEG), the parent company and home of
BI-LO, Fresco y Mas, Harveys Supermarket and Winn-Dixie grocery
stores, is one of the largest conventional supermarket companies in
the U.S. SEG grocery stores, liquor stores and in-store pharmacies
serve communities throughout the seven southeastern states of
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina
and South Carolina. BI-LO, Fresco y Mas, Harveys Supermarket and
Winn-Dixie are well known and well-respected regional brands with
deep heritages, strong neighborhood ties, proud histories of giving
back, talented and caring associates and strong commitments to
providing the best possible quality and value to customers.  Their
Web sites are http://www.bi-lo.com/,http://www.frescoymas.com/,
http://www.harveyssupermarkets.com/and http://www.winndixie.com/
BI-LO and its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
on March 23, 2009 (Bankr. D. S.C. Case No. 09-02140).  BI-LO
emerged from bankruptcy in May 2010 with Lone Star Funds remaining
as majority owner.

Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 05-11063, transferred April 14, 2005, to Bankr.
M.D. Fla. Case Nos. 05-03817 through 05-03840) on Feb. 21, 2005.

In December 2011, BI-LO Holdings signed a deal to acquire all of
the outstanding shares of Winn-Dixie Stores stock in a merger.
Holdings was later renamed Southeastern Grocers.

On March 27, 2018, Southeastern Grocers, LLC, and 26 affiliated
debtors sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
18-10700).  SEG commenced Chapter 11 cases to seek confirmation of
a prepackaged chapter 11 plan that will cancel their unsecured
notes in exchange for 100% of the equity of the reorganized
company.

The Debtors have requested joint administration of the cases.  The
Honorable Mary F. Walrath oversees the cases. Weil, Gotshal &
Manges LLP is serving as legal counsel to the Debtors, Evercore is
serving as their investment banker, and FTI Consulting Inc. as
restructuring advisor.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing
agent and administrative advisor.

Morrison & Foerster LLP is serving as legal counsel and Moelis &
Company LLC is serving as financial advisor to an ad hoc group of
holders of Unsecured Notes and 9.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2019.


SPANISH BROADCASTING: Posts $16.5 Million Net Income in 2018
------------------------------------------------------------
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. has filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K reporting net
income of $16.49 million on $142.36 million of net revenue for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to net income of $19.62 million
on $134.70 million of net revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.
The decrease in net income of $3.1 million was primarily due to
the reduction of income tax benefit offset by the increase in
operating income and the decrease in interest expense, net.

Consolidated Adjusted OIBDA, a non-GAAP measure, totaled $50.1
million compared to $36.5 million for the same prior year period,
resulting in an increase of $13.6 million or 37%.  The Company's
radio segment Adjusted OIBDA increased $12.3 million or 29%,
primarily due to the increase in net revenue of $6.9 million and a
decrease in operating expense of $5.4 million.  Radio station
operating expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in legal
settlements, production and talent costs, and special event
expenses offset by increases in commissions and advertising
expenses.  The Company's television segment Adjusted OIBDA
increased $2.3 million, due to the decrease in station operating
expenses of $1.5 million and the increase in net revenue of $0.8
million.  Television station operating expenses decreased primarily
due to decreases in production costs, compensation and benefits,
professional fees and facilities expense offset by a decrease in
production tax credits and an increase in special events expense.
The Company's corporate expenses, excluding non-cash stock-based
compensation, increased $1.0 million or 11% primarily due to
increases in compensation and benefits and professional fees.

Operating income totaled $51.6 million compared to $40.5 million
for the same prior year period, representing an increase of $11.1
million or 27%.  This increase in operating income was mainly due
to the increase in net revenue and decreases in operating expenses
and recapitalization costs offset by increases in corporate
expenses, an impairment of an FCC broadcasting license and having
recognized less gains on the sale of the New York property than
were recognized in the prior year for the sale of the Los Angeles
facility and spectrum assets.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, Spanish Broadcasting had $444.31 million in
total assets, $523.69 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $79.37 million.

Crowe LLP, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, the Company's auditor since
2013, issued a "going concern" opinion in its report dated April 1,
2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the 12.5% Senior Secured
Notes had a maturity date of April 15, 2017.  Cash from operations
or the sale of assets was not sufficient to repay the notes when
they became due.  In addition, at Dec. 31, 2018 the Company had a
working capital deficiency.  These factors raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.

                        Quarter End Results

For the quarter-ended Dec. 31, 2018, consolidated net revenue
totaled $39.6 million compared to $36.4 million for the same prior
year period, resulting in an increase of $3.2 million or 9%.  The
Company's radio segment net revenue increased $4.9 million or 16%,
due to increases in local, national, network, barter and digital
sales, partially offset by a decrease in special events revenue.
The Company's television segment net revenue decreased $1.7 million
or 29%, primarily from a reduction in subscriber based revenue,
partially offset by increases in local and national sales.

Consolidated Adjusted OIBDA, a non-GAAP measure, totaled $17.4
million compared to $13.9 million for the same prior year period,
representing an increase of $3.5 million or 25%.  The Company's
radio segment Adjusted OIBDA increased $5.0 million or 38%,
primarily due to the increase in net revenue of $4.9 million and a
decrease in operating expenses of $0.1 million.  Radio station
operating expenses decreased mainly due to decreases in legal
settlements, production costs, professional fees and special event
expenses offset by increases in taxes and licenses, sales
commissions, and barter expenses.  The Company's television segment
Adjusted OIBDA decreased $1.4 million, due to the decrease in net
revenue of $1.7 million, partially offset by a decrease in
operating expenses of $0.3 million.  Television station operating
expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in production costs
and taxes and licenses offset by a decrease in production tax
credits.  The Company's corporate expenses, excluding non-cash
stock-based compensation, increased $0.2 million or 9%, mostly due
to an increase in compensation and benefits.

Operating income totaled $14.3 million compared to $14.4 million
for the same prior year period, representing a decrease of $0.1
million or less than 1%.  This decrease in operating income was
primarily due to having recognized the gain on the sale of spectrum
assets in the prior year and current year increases in
recapitalization costs and corporate expenses offset by an increase
in net revenue and decreases in operating expenses.

                    Discussion and Results

"Our fourth quarter and full year 2018 performance represent one of
the best operating results in our 35-year history and the true
power of our multi-media strategy and leading radio, television,
digital and experiential assets," commented Raul Alarcon, chairman
and CEO. "Our multi-year effort to transform our company from a
traditional broadcaster into an integrated multi-media company is
clearly evident in our financial results.

"This past year we generated solid top-line growth while also
prudently managing our costs, which resulted in consolidated
Adjusted OIBDA growth of 37%.  We believe this operating margin
performance significantly outperformed both our Spanish- and
English-language peers.  In addition to this industry-leading
performance, our audio rankings, as well as our TV, digital and
mobile engagement metrics, also grew significantly."

Mr. Alarcon continued, "We entered 2019 with significant momentum
in our business, a strong management team, a clear and unambiguous
operating strategy, and a 100% commitment to taking the next
critical steps in furthering our business transformation.

"Looking ahead, we are focused on building on our successes to date
and driving further strong performance in 2019 and beyond.  Our key
priorities include further integration of our assets, prudently
managing our costs and delivering sustainable growth across all our
businesses."

      Continued Recapitalization and Restructuring Efforts

"We have not repaid our outstanding 12.5% Senior Secured Notes due
2017 (the "Notes") since they became due on April 17, 2017, and
continue to evaluate all options available to refinance the Notes.
While we assess how to best achieve a successful refinancing of the
Notes, we have continued to pay monthly interest on the Notes,
payments that a group of investors purporting to own our 10 3/4%
Series B Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock (the
"Series B preferred stock") have challenged through the institution
of litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery.  The complaint
filed by these investors revealed a purported foreign ownership of
our Series B preferred stock, which we are actively addressing,
including before the Federal Communications Commission (the "FCC")
in order to protect our broadcast licenses.  Our refinancing
efforts have been made more difficult and complex by the Series B
preferred stock litigation and foreign ownership issue.  We provide
more information about each of these items in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

"We have worked and continue to work with our advisors regarding a
consensual recapitalization or restructuring of our balance sheet,
including through the issuance of new debt or equity to raise the
necessary funds to repay the Notes.  We believe that the delay in
refinancing the Notes has adversely affected us, in that we have
been paying substantially more in interest expense on our
outstanding Notes than would be the case if we refinanced them in
the current market based on the feedback we have received from
several financial institutions and potential sources of capital;
there is a cloud on title regarding who validly owns our Series B
preferred stock, which has created uncertainty as to who owns these
shares, and the parties with whom the Company could potentially
negotiate a consensual restructuring; we are incurring higher legal
costs than otherwise would be the case due to our efforts to
resolve the situation in general, to defend ourselves against the
Series B preferred stock litigation and to address the foreign
ownership issue before the FCC; the trading price of our common
stock and preferred stock has been materially adversely affected;
our ability to attract interest from investment banks and third
party capital suppliers has been materially adversely affected; our
reputation has been similarly negatively affected as a general
matter despite our diligent efforts to resolve the situation; and
the negativity and complexity surrounding our situation has been an
unfortunate distraction from our otherwise successful and healthy
operating business.  The resolution of the recapitalization or
restructuring of our balance sheet, the litigation with the
purported holders of our Series B preferred stock and the foreign
ownership issue are subject to several factors currently beyond our
control.  Our efforts to effect a consensual refinancing of the
Notes, the Series B preferred stock litigation and the foreign
ownership issue will likely continue to have a material adverse
effect on us if they are not successfully resolved.  We face
various risks regarding these matters which are summarized in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,"
the Company stated in a press release.

The Company's report on Form 10-K is available from the SEC's
website at https://is.gd/TZESnU.

                  About Spanish Broadcasting

Based in Miami, Florida, Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
(OTCMKTS:SBSAA) -- http://www.spanishbroadcasting.com/-- owns and
operates radio stations located in the top U.S. Hispanic markets of
New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago, San Francisco and Puerto
Rico, airing the Tropical, Regional Mexican, Spanish Adult
Contemporary, Top 40 and Urbano format genres SBS also operates
AIRE Radio Networks, a national radio platform of over 250
affiliated stations reaching 94% of the U.S. Hispanic audience.
SBS also owns MegaTV, a network television operation with
over-the-air, cable and satellite distribution and affiliates
throughout the U.S. and Puerto Rico, produces a nationwide roster
of live concerts and events, and owns a stable of digital
properties, including La Musica, a mobile app providing
Latino-focused audio and video streaming content and HitzMaker, a
new-talent destination for aspiring artists.


SUNCREST STONE: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended to May 9
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Austin Carter of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Georgia extended the period during which Suncrest Stone
Products, LLC and its affiliated debtors have the exclusive right
to file a Chapter 11 plan through May 9, and to solicit acceptances
for the plan through July 8.

                  About Suncrest Stone Products

Suncrest Stone Products, LLC -- https://www.suncreststone.com/ --
is a stone supplier in Ashburn, Georgia.  Its products include
Ashlar, Country Ledge, Ledge, River Rock, Olde-Castle, Splitface,
Stock, and Rubble.

Suncrest Stone Products and 341 Stone Properties, LLC, sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Ga.
Lead Case No. 18-10850) on July 13, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Max Suter, authorized officer, Suncrest estimated assets of less
than $1 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  341
Stone estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and
liabilities.  Judge Austin E. Carter presides over the cases.

Stone & Baxter, LLP, is the Debtors' counsel.  McMurry Smith &
Company is the accountant. Crumley and Associates Inc. d/b/a South
Georgia Appraisal Company is appraiser to the Debtor.



SUNEX INTERNATIONAL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Sunex International, Inc.
        1401 Green Road, Suite I
        Pompano Beach, FL 33064

Business Description: Founded in 1985, Sunex International --
                      http://www.sunexintl.com-- is a supplier of
                      architectural products and complete turn-key
                      building materials for builders, architects,
                      and designers throughout the Caribbean and
                      South Florida.  The Company specializes in
                      windows, doors, lumber, framing, roofing,
                      lighting, flooring, tools, fasteners,
                      underground pipes, pumps, and more.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 3, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Florida (Fort Lauderdale)

Case No.: 19-14372

Judge: Hon. Raymond B. Ray

Debtor's Counsel: Michael D. Seese, Esq.
                  SEESE, P.A.
                  101 NE 3rd Avenue, Suite 410
                  Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
                  Tel: 954-745-5897
                  Email: mseese@seeselaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Jerry Rand, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-14372.pdf


SUNPLAY POOLS: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended to June 3
--------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Joel Marker extended the period during which
SunPlay Pools and Spas Superstore, Inc. has the exclusive right to
file a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization through June 3.

The extension would give the company more time to finalize its plan
and negotiate with creditors after it is filed. SunPlay is about to
enter its busiest time of the year, which should provide the
company with additional monies to fund its plan. Moreover,
SunPlay's principal John Olson has intended to inject capital into
the company in order to retain his equity interests. As of Jan. 31,
SunPlay had $8,372 in monies in the bank, inventory valued at
$430,454, and vehicles valued at $379,913, according to a previous
report by the Troubled Company Reporter.

                   About SunPlay Pools and Spas
                         Superstore Inc.

Founded in 1967, SunPlay Pools and Spas Superstore, Inc. --
https://www.sunplay.com/ -- operates a retail store offering pool
and spa supplies, equipment, chemicals, parts and services.  It has
been transitioning to serve customers everywhere via its online
sales department at Sunplay.com and HotTubWarehouse.com.

SunPlay Pools and Spas Superstore sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Utah Case No. 18-27417) on
Oct. 4, 2018.  In the petition signed by John A. Olson, president,
the Debtor disclosed $692,093 in assets and $2,571,463 in
liabilities.  Judge Joel T. Marker oversees the case.  The Debtor
tapped The Fox Law Corporation as its lead bankruptcy counsel; and
Cohne Kinghorn, PC, as its local bankruptcy counsel.



TOWERSTREAM CORP: Incurs $10.2 Million Net Loss in 2018
-------------------------------------------------------
Towerstream Corporation has filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K reporting a net loss
attributable to common stockholders of $10.21 million on $24.60
million of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a
net loss attributable to common stockholders of $14.37 million on
$26.21 million of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, Towerstream had $18.41 million in total
assets, $42.85 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $24.44 million.

Marcum LLP, in New York, NY, the Company's auditor since 2007,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated April 1,
2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, noting that the Company has a significant
working capital deficiency, has incurred significant losses and
needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain
its operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $4.2 million and a working capital deficiency of
approximately $36.9 million and is subject to forbearance
agreements under its loan agreement.  The Company incurred
significant operating losses since inception and continues to
generate losses from operations, and as of Dec. 31, 2018, the
Company has an accumulated deficit of $199.3 million.

Towerstream stated "The Company has monitored and reduced certain
of its operating costs over the course of 2017 and 2018.
Historically, the Company has financed its operations through
private and public placement of equity securities, as well as debt
financing and capital leases.  The Company's ability to fund its
longer term cash requirements is subject to multiple risks, many of
which are beyond its control.  The Company intends to raise
additional capital, either through debt or equity financings or
through the potential sale of the Company's assets in order to
achieve its business plan objectives.  Management believes that it
can be successful in obtaining additional capital; however, no
assurance can be provided that the Company will be able to do so.
There is no assurance that any funds raised will be sufficient to
enable the Company to attain profitable operations or continue as a
going concern.  To the extent that the Company is unsuccessful, the
Company may need to curtail or cease its operations and implement a
plan to extend payables or reduce overhead until sufficient
additional capital is raised to support further operations.  Our
ability to make payments on our indebtedness and to fund planned
capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in
the future.  Our ability to generate cash in the future will be
dependent upon, among other things, the financial performance of
the Company, and general economic, financial, competitive,
legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our
control.  There can be no assurance that such a plan will be
successful."

The Company's report on Form 10-K is available from the SEC's
website at https://is.gd/jStjV5.

                       About Towerstream

Headquartered in Middletown, Rhode Island, Towerstream Corporation
(OTCQB:TWER) -- http://www.towerstream.com/-- is a fixed-wireless
fiber alternative company delivering Internet access to businesses.
The Company provides services to business customers in New York
City, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Miami,
Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, Philadelphia, Las Vegas-Reno and
Providence-Newport.


USA GYMNASTICS: Exclusive Filing Period Extended Until Aug. 5
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robyn Moberly of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Indiana extended the period during which USA Gymnastics
has the exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan through Aug. 5
and to solicit acceptances for the plan through Oct. 3.

USA Gymnastics' attorney, Catherine Steege, Esq., at Jenner & Block
LLP, said the company will have to wait until the deadline for
filing claims expires to better assess claims of its creditors. The
company will also have to wait until the case (Adv. Pro. No.
19-50012), which was filed to determine its rights under various
insurance policies, is resolved, according to the attorney.

USA Gymnastics has more than 500 creditors, most of whom are sex
abuse victims who are represented by a court-appointed committee.
These creditors have until April 29 to file their claims.

                      About USA Gymnastics

USA Gymnastics -- https://www.usagym.org/ -- is a not-for-profit
organization incorporated in Texas. Based in Indianapolis, Indiana,
USAG's organization encompasses six disciplines: women's
gymnastics, men's gymnastics, trampoline and tumbling, rhythmic
gymnastics, acrobatic gymnastics, and group gymnastics.  USAG
provides educational opportunities for coaches and judges, as well
as gymnastics club owners and administrators, and sanctions
approximately 4,000 competitions and events throughout the United
States annually.  More than 200,000 athletes, professionals, and
clubs are members of USAG.  USAG sets the rules and policies that
govern the sport of gymnastics in the United States, including
selecting and training the United States gymnastics teams for the
Olympics and World Championships.  As of the Petition Date, USAG
employs 53 individuals, nearly all of whom work for USAG
full-time.

USA Gymnastics sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case
No. 18-09108) on Dec. 5, 2018.  The Debtor estimated $50 million to
$100 million in assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Hon. Robyn L. Moberly is the case judge.

The Debtor tapped Jenner & Block LLP as counsel; Alfers GC
Consulting, LLC, and Scramble Systems, LLC, as business consulting
services providers; and Omni Management Group, Inc., as claims
agent.




WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL: Adopts New Bonus and Retention Plans
---------------------------------------------------------------
Weatherford International plc and its compensation advisors have
reviewed the Company's incentive plans to determine whether they
continue to fulfill their purpose of retaining key employees and
incentivizing key employees to perform at a high level.  Currently,
the Company's incentive plans consist primarily of an annual cash
bonus program and long-term equity incentive awards.  After
reviewing the Company's current incentive plans, the Company and
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors have
determined that the current plans are not optimally effective in
achieving their goals.  Most significantly, because the ordinary
shares of the Company have been trading at extremely low prices,
the Company does not have a large enough share reserve to continue
to rely on the Company's 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan as a material
retention and incentive tool in the near future.

As a result, the Board, on the recommendation of the Compensation
Committee, determined to (i) suspend the Company's Executive
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Plan with respect to 2019 and
(ii) adopt (a) a new Executive Bonus Plan and (b) new retention
award letters, in each case for certain key employees, including
the named executive officers.  

Executive Bonus Plan

The EBP provides a means of rewarding key employees based on the
overall performance of the Company and the achievement of certain
quarterly and cumulative performance goals in 2019 to be
established by the Compensation Committee and communicated to
participants.  Each individual participant is provided a cash
target bonus opportunity set by the Compensation Committee.  Each
participant is eligible to receive up to 200% of his or her target
bonus, if stretch performance is achieved.  Payments are made in
cash quarterly.  Participants must generally remain employed until
the date of payment to receive payments under the EBP.  The target
bonus opportunities for the named executive officers are set forth
in the table below:

  Named Executive Officer                  Target Bonus Opportunity

  -----------------------                 
------------------------
  Mark McCollum                                 $7,000,000
  Christoph Bausch                              $1,650,000
  Christina Ibrahim                             $1,175,000
  Karl Blanchard                                $2,300,000
  Stuart Fraser                                 $231,250

Retention Award Letters

The Company entered into Retention Award Letters with the same key
employees who participate in the EBP.  Each such individual will be
eligible to receive a cash retention award in an amount equal to a
percentage of the recipient's annual base salary (200% for the
named executive officers other than Stuart Fraser, and 150% for
Stuart Fraser).  The Retention Award amounts for the named
executive officers are set forth in the table below:

  Named Executive Officer                    Retention Award
Amount
  -----------------------                   
----------------------
  Mark McCollum                                   $2,000,000
  Christoph Bausch                                $1,300,000
  Christina Ibrahim                               $1,250,000
  Karl Blanchard                                  $1,400,000
  Stuart Fraser                                   $637,500

The Retention Awards are payable in advance within 30 days after
participants accept the terms.  Under the Retention Award Letters,
in the event a recipient of a Retention Award voluntarily
terminates his or her employment, or the Company terminates such
recipient's employment for Cause, in either case, before the first
anniversary of the date on which the recipient received the
Retention Award, then such recipient will be required to promptly
repay to the Company, the amount of the Retention Award.  A
recipient will not be required to repay a Retention Award in the
event of termination of employment due to death or disability or by
the Company without Cause subject to the recipient's (or in the
case of the recipient’s death, the recipient's legal
representative's) execution of a release of claims against the
Company.  The Retention Award Letters also include certain
restrictive covenants (including agreements not to solicit Company
clients or employees for one year following termination and not to
compete with the Company for six months following termination).

                     About Weatherford

Weatherford (NYSE: WFT), an Irish public limited company and Swiss
tax resident -- http://www.weatherford.com/-- is a multinational
oilfield service company providing innovative solutions, technology
and services to the oil and gas industry.  The Company operates in
over 80 countries and has a network of approximately 700 locations,
including manufacturing, service, research and development, and
training facilities and employs approximately 26,500 people.

Weatherford reported a net loss attributable to the company of
$2.81 billion for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net
loss attributable to the company of $2.81 billion for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, Weatherford had $6.60
billion in total assets, $10.26 billion in total liabilities, and a
total shareholders' deficiency of $3.66 billion.

Weatherford's credit ratings have been downgraded by multiple
credit rating agencies and these agencies could further downgrade
the Company's credit ratings.  On Dec. 24, 2018, S&P Global Ratings
downgraded the Company's senior unsecured notes to CCC- from CCC+,
with a negative outlook.  Weatherford's issuer credit rating was
lowered to CCC from B-.  On Dec. 20, 2018, Moody's Investors
Services downgraded the Company's credit rating on its senior
unsecured notes to Caa3 from Caa1 and its speculative grade
liquidity rating to SGL-4 from SGL-3, both with a negative
outlook.

The Company said its non-investment grade status may limit its
ability to refinance its existing debt, could cause it to refinance
or issue debt with less favorable and more restrictive terms and
conditions, and could increase certain fees and interest rates of
its borrowings.  Suppliers and financial institutions may lower or
eliminate the level of credit provided through payment terms or
intraday funding when dealing with the Company thereby increasing
the need for higher levels of cash on hand, which would decrease
the Company's ability to repay debt balances, negatively affect its
cash flow and impact its access to the inventory and services
needed to operate its business.


WESTERN RESERVE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Western Reserve Water Systems, Inc.
        4133 East 49th Street
        Cleveland, OH 44105

Business Description: Western Reserve Water Systems, Inc. --
                      http://www.westernreservewater.com--
                      is an industrial water service company
                      offering a wide range of equipment,
                      services, parts, and consulting services for
                      the industrial process water and high purity
                      water user.  Western Reserve Water Systems
                      services are supplied to various industries,
                      such as power generation, chemical
                      processing, auto, steel, food & beverage,
                      pharmaceutical, hospital, medical,
                      laboratory and light industrial and
                      commercial markets.  The Company's service
                      center and regeneration facility is
                      currently located in Cleveland, Ohio, with
                      satellite service locations in Cincinnati,
                      Ohio, and Terre Haute, Indiana.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Ohio (Cleveland)

Case No.: 19-11864

Judge: Hon. Jessica E. Price Smith

Debtor's Counsel: Glenn E. Forbes, Esq.
                  FORBES LAW LLC
                  166 Main Street
                  Painesville, OH 44077-3403
                  Tel: (440) 357-6211
                  Email: bankruptcy@geflaw.net

Total Assets: $10,285,282

Total Liabilities: $4,306,486

The petition was signed by Michael Eiermann, president.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/ohnb19-11864.pdf

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Aetna Plastics Corp.                                    $16,579
P.O. Box 931780
Cleveland, OH 44193

2. Benovation                                              $29,557
2035 Reading Rd.
Cincinnati, OH 45202

3. Bonded Chemicals                                        $64,083
1125 Solutions Center
Chicago, IL 60677

4. Chemtreat, Inc.                                         $23,179
15045
Collections Center
Chicago, IL 60693

5. Enpress, LLC                                            $17,535
34899 Curtis Blvd
Eastlake, OH 44095

6. Enviroserve                                             $59,851
PO Box 413070
Salt Lake City, UT 84141

7. Filmtec Corporation                                    $204,596
4118 Collection Center Dr
Chicago, IL 60693

8. GCS Water Purification, LLC                            $130,471
PO Box 703
Rosharon, TX 77583

9. Kelly Services, Inc.                                    $41,855
PO Box 820405
Philadelphia, PA 19182

10. Key Bank                     Loan and Leases        $2,895,451
127 Public Square
Cleveland, OH 44114

11.Mettler-Toledo Ingold                                   $31,967
23669 Network Place
Chicago, IL 60673

12. NEORSD                                                 $21,016
PO Box 94550
Cleveland, OH 44101-4550

13. OTP Industrial Solutions                               $24,464
PO Box 73278
Cleveland, OH 44193

14. Purolite Company                                       $19,237
PO Box 824075
Philadelphia, PA 19182-4075

15. Resintech                                              $47,958
1 Resintech Plaza
160 Cooper Road
West Berlin, NJ 08091

16. Rexel of America, LLC                                  $18,517
PO Box 742833
Atlanta, GA 30374-2833

17. Suez WTS USA, Inc.                                    $105,702
12822 Collection Center Drive
Chicago, IL 60693

18. Talent Transportation, Inc.                            $15,600
PO Box 361159
Strongville, OH 44136

19. Water Surplus/Surplus Mgmt.                           $123,073
PO Box 2668
Loves Park, IL 61132

20. WSM                                                    $25,860
580 Golden Oak Parkway
Oakwood Village
OH 44146


WILSON MANIFOLDS: Seeks 21-Day Extension of Exclusivity Periods
---------------------------------------------------------------
Wilson Manifolds, Inc. and its president Keith Wilson asked the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to
extend by 21 days the period during which the company has the
exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan and solicit acceptances
for the plan.

Pursuant to prior court ruling and the Bankruptcy Code, another
"party in interest" may file a plan of reorganization if Wilson
Manifolds has not filed a plan accepted by each class of impaired
claims or interests by May 22.   The company's current exclusive
filing period expired on March 22.

Wilson Manifolds, a manufacturer of auto racing parts, suffered a
significant slowdown in its operations recently duue to a failed
joint venture and two protracted lawsuits.  This slowdown resulted
in the company's delinquency in tax and other obligations and in
the financial decline of the company's owner.  

Since the commencement of its bankruptcy case, Wilson Manifolds has
made progress towards reorganizing its business affairs. The
company has reached agreements with its two largest creditors --
secured creditor BB&T Bank and equipment lessor TCF Equipment
Finance. These agreements have provided financial relief to Wilson
Manifolds and have helped increased cashflow.   

Wilson Manifolds has also had its assets appraised and is
considering options to either joint venture with an investor or
sell its assets. The company expects to have a Chapter 11 plan on
file within a few days.

                    About Wilson Manifolds Inc.

Wilson Manifolds, Inc. manufactures products for the automotive and
racing industries. It specializes in custom-built and installed
parts for high-performance vehicles.  

Wilson Manifolds sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-21658) on Sept. 21,
2018.  The case is jointly administered with the Chapter 11 case of
Keith D. Wilson, the company's president (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case
No.18-21662).  In the petition signed by Mr. Wilson, Wilson
Manifolds estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of
$1 million to $10 million.

Wilson Manifolds tapped Hoffman, Larin & Agnetti, P.A. as legal
counsel; Siegelaub, Rosenberg, Golding & Feller, P.A. as
accountant; and Moecker Auctions, Inc. as appraiser.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed.


Z GALLERIE: Seeks to Hire A&G Realty as Real Estate Consultant
--------------------------------------------------------------
Z Gallerie, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to employ A&G
Realty Partners, LLC, as real estate consultant to the Debtors.

Z Gallerie requires A&G Realty to:

   a) consult with the Debtors to discuss the Debtors' goals,
      objectives and financial parameters in relation to the
      Leases and Properties;

   b) provide ongoing advice and guidance based upon the Debtors'
      goals and objectives;

   c) negotiate with the landlords of the Properties on behalf of
      the Debtors in order to assist the Debtors in obtaining
      Lease Modifications;

   d) negotiate with the landlords of the Properties and other
      third parties on behalf of the Debtors in order to assist
      the Debtors in obtaining Early Termination Rights; and

   e) provide status update reports to the Debtors on the
      Services.

A&G Realty will be paid as follows:

   a. Retainer. The Debtors shall pay A&G Realty a retainer fee
      in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000). The
      retainer shall be nonrefundable and shall be applied to the
      fees and expenses due under the terms of the Agreement.

   b. Early Termination Rights – For each Early Termination
Right
      obtained by A&G Realty on behalf of the Debtors, A&G Realty
      shall earn and be paid a fee in the amount of a quarter of
      one (1) month's Gross Occupancy Cost.

   c. Monetary Lease Modifications (i.e. Rent Reductions) – For
      each Monetary Lease Modification obtained by A&G Realty on
      behalf of the Debtors, A&G Realty shall earn and be paid a
      fee in the amount of three percent (3%) of the Occupancy
      Cost Savings per Lease.

   d. Non-Monetary Lease Modifications – For Non-Monetary Lease
      Modifications obtained by A&G Realty on behalf of the
      Debtors, A&G Realty shall earn and be paid a fee in
      the amount of seven hundred and fifty dollars ($750) per
      Lease.

Andrew Graiser, co-president of A&G Realty Partners, LLC, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their/its
estates.

A&G Realty can be reached at:

     Andrew Graiser
     A&G REALTY PARTNERS, LLC
     445 Broadhollow Road, Suite 410
     Melville, NY 11747
     Tel: (631) 465-9506

                        About Z Gallerie

Z Gallerie, LLC -- https://www.zgallerie.com/ -- is a retailer of
home decor products. It operates 76 retail stores in 28 states as
of the petition date.

Z Gallerie and its affiliate Z Gallerie Holding Company, LLC,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-10488) on March 11, 2019.  At the time of
the filing, the Debtors estimated assets of $100 million to $500
million and liabilities of $100 million to $500 million.

The Debtors tapped Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP and Kirkland
& Ellis as legal counsel; Lazard Middle Market LLC as investment
banker; Berkeley Research Group, LLC as restructuring advisor; and
Stretto as claims and noticing agent.


Z GALLERIE: Seeks to Hire Stretto as Administrative Advisor
-----------------------------------------------------------
Z Gallerie, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates, seek authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to employ
Stretto, as administrative advisor to the Debtors.

Z Gallerie requires Stretto to:

   (a) assist with, among other things, legal noticing, claims
       management and reconciliation, plan solicitation,
       balloting, disbursements, and tabulation of votes, and
       prepare any related reports, as required in support of
       confirmation of a chapter 11 plan, and in connection with
       such services, process requests for documents from parties
       in interest, including, if applicable, brokerage firms,
       bank back-offices and institutional holders;

   (b) prepare an official ballot certification and, if
       necessary, testify in support of the ballot tabulation
       results;

   (c) assist with the preparation of the Debtors' schedules of
       assets and liabilities and statements of financial affairs
       and gather data in conjunction therewith;

   (d) provide a confidential data room, if requested;

   (e) manage and coordinate any distributions pursuant to a
       chapter 11 plan; and

   (f) provide such other processing, solicitation, balloting and
       other administrative services described in the Engagement
       Agreement, but not included in the Section 156(c)
       Application, as may be requested from time to time by the
       Debtors, the Court or the Office of the Clerk of the
       United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
       Delaware.

Stretto will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly billing
rates. Stretto will be paid a retainer in the amount of $10,000. It
will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred.

James Le, chief operating officer of Stretto, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Stretto can be reached at:

     Travis Vandell
     STRETTO
     410 Exchange, Suite 100
     Irvine, CA 92606
     Tel: (800) 634-7734

                        About Z Gallerie

Z Gallerie, LLC -- https://www.zgallerie.com/ -- is a retailer of
home decor products. It operates 76 retail stores in 28 states as
of the petition date.

Z Gallerie and its affiliate Z Gallerie Holding Company, LLC,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-10488) on March 11, 2019.  At the time of
the filing, the Debtors estimated assets of $100 million to $500
million and liabilities of $100 million to $500 million.

The Debtors tapped Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP and Kirkland
& Ellis as legal counsel; Lazard Middle Market LLC as investment
banker; Berkeley Research Group, LLC as restructuring advisor; and
Stretto as claims and noticing agent.


[*] S&P Withdraws Ratings on Four Issuers' Revenue Bonds
--------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings has withdrawn its ratings on four issuers'
revenue bonds that are secured by project revenues from federal
contracts. At the same time, S&P Global Ratings has removed the
ratings from CreditWatch, where they were placed with negative
implications Dec. 21, 2018. The issuers and ratings affected are:

-- Fannin County Public Facility Corp., Texas (BB/Watch Neg);  
-- Willacy County Public Facility Corp., Texas (BB+/Watch Neg);
-- Hudspeth County, Texas/ West Texas Detention Facilities Corp.,
Texas (BB/Watch Neg);
-- Garza County Public Facilities Corp., Texas (B/Watch Neg).

"We base these rating actions on our inability to communicate with
the federal agency that appropriates the funding, or the operator
who manages a specific facility. As stated in our Dec. 21, 2018
publication, we have increasingly come to view ongoing direct
access to the major parties engaged in the federal contracts and
operating agreements, including the federal agency under contract
(Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE], the Bureau of Prisons
[BOP], or U.S. Marshals Service[USMS]), the operator, and an issuer
representative as key components in our assessment of this sector's
credit quality," S&P said.  "And, to maintain a rating in this
sector, we will need to speak with the federal agency that
appropriates the funding at least annually, the operator who runs
the facility at least quarterly, and the issuer that supports the
transactions at least annually. Failure to receive the requested
information will likely result in our withdrawal of the affected
rating, preceded in accordance with our policies."

S&P has made repeated attempts to have direct, regular
communication with these federal entities and operators. The rating
agency has been able to speak with ICE and the operators but it has
been unable to communicate with BOP and USMS, which have contracts
with these local entities. Furthermore, given its unsuccessful
outreach attempts, S&P believes it is unlikely that any sort of
meaningful dialogue will be forthcoming or be maintained on a
regular basis.

"Limited or incomplete access to the federal entities limits our
ability to reflect federal policy changes in our ratings and report
on programmatic or appropriations-related risks within the sector.
While the federal budget is accessible via publicly available
sources, we have very little insight into important aspects of
federal policies that have been key drivers of rating changes in
the past two-year period, such as lack of contract renewal or
bipartisan funding deals brokered on reduction of funding for
detention beds," S&P said. "Furthermore, without access to the
prison operators we cannot analyze operational issues that might
influence the facilities or their compliance with state and federal
regulations. As a result, we do not have sufficient information to
maintain these ratings and are withdrawing the ratings in
accordance with our policies."


[^] BOOK REVIEW: GROUNDED: Destruction of Eastern Airlines
----------------------------------------------------------
Grounded: Frank Lorenzo and the Destruction of Eastern Airlines
Author: Aaron Bernstein
Publisher: Beard Books
Softcover: 272 Pages
List Price: $34.95

Order a copy today at
http://www.beardbooks.com/beardbooks/grounded.html

Barbara Walters once referred to Frank Lorenzo as "the most hated
man in America." Since 1990, when this work was first published and
Eastern Airlines' troubles were front-page news, there have been
many worthy contenders for the title. Nonetheless, readers
sensitive to labor-management concerns, particularly in the context
of corporate restructurings, will find in this book much to support
Barbara Walters' characterization.

To recap: For a few brief and discordant years, Frank Lorenzo was
boss of the biggest airline conglomerate in the free world
(Aeroflot was larger), combining Eastern, Continental, Frontier,
and People Express into Texas Air Corporation, financing his empire
with junk bonds. TAC ultimately comprised a fleet of 451 planes and
50,000 employees, with revenues of $7 billion.

But Lorenzo was lousy on people issues, famously saying, "I'm not
paid to be a candy ass." The mid-1980s were a bad time to take that
approach. Those were the years when the so-called Japanese model of
management, which emphasized cooperation between management and
labor, was creating a stir. The Lorenzo model was old school: If
the unions give you any trouble, break 'em. That strategy had
worked for him at Continental, where he'd filed Chapter 11 despite
the airline's $60 million in cash reserves, in order to exploit a
provision in Bankruptcy Code allowing him to abrogate his contracts
with the unions. But Congress plugged that loophole by the time
Lorenzo went to the mat with Charles Bryan, I AM chapter president.
Lorenzo might have succeeded in breaking the machinists alone, but
when flight attendants and pilots honored the picket lines, he
should have known it was time to deal. He didn't.

Instead he tried again for a strategic advantage through the
bankruptcy courts, by filing Chapter 11 in the Southern District of
New York where bankruptcy judges were believed to be more favorably
disposed toward management than in Miami where Eastern was
headquartered. Eastern had to hide behind the skirts of its
subsidiary, Ionosphere Clubs, Inc., a New York corporation, in
order to get into SDNY. Six minutes later, Eastern itself filed in
the same court as a related proceeding.

The case was assigned to Judge Burton Lifland, whom Eastern's
bankruptcy lawyer, Harvey Miller, knew well, but Lorenzo was
mistaken if he believed that serendipitous lottery assignment would
be his salvation. Judge Lifland a year later declared Lorenzo unfit
to run the airline and appointed Martin Shugrue as trustee. Most
hated man or not, one wonders whether the debacle was all Lorenzo's
fault. Eastern's unions, in particular the notoriously militant
machinists, were perpetual malcontents, and Charlie Bryan was an
anti-management zealot, to the point of exasperating even other IAM
officers.

The book provides a detailed account of the three-and-a-half-year
period between Lorenzo's acquisition of Eastern in the autumn of
1986 and Judge Lifland's appointment of the trustee in April 1990.
It includes the history of Eastern's pre-Lorenzo management, from
World War I flying ace Eddie Rickenbacker to astronaut Frank
Borman.

Aaron Bernstein won numerous awards during his 20-year career as a
professional journalist. He is an associated editor for Business
Week.

Aaron Bernstein is the editor of Global Proxy Watch, a corporate
governance newsletter for institutional investors. He is also a
non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Pensions and Capital
Stewardship Project at Harvard Law School. He left BusinessWeek
magazine in 2006 after a 23-year career as an editor and senior
writer covering workplace and social issues.



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2019.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***