/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/190221.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Thursday, February 21, 2019, Vol. 23, No. 51

                            Headlines

177 LEFFERTS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
A&R COMPLETE: Seeks to Hire Timothy Thomas as Counsel
ACETO CORP: Files Chapter 11 to Sell Chemicals Business for $338MM
ACETO CORP: Has $60 Million of DIP Financing
ACETO CORPORATION: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors

AINA LE'A: Committee Seeks to Expand Scope of Work of Counsel
ALLEN SUPPLY: Seeks to Hire Beechwood Capital as Business Broker
AMERICAN GREEN: Trustee Hires Claro Group as Financial Advisor
AMERICANN INC: Incurs First Quarter Net Loss of $538,508
APEX XPRESS: Plan Outline Hearing Scheduled for April 1

AREABEATS PROPERTIES: Hires Restaurant Realty as Broker
ARP FAMILY: Seeks to Hire Integrity Capital as Loan Broker
AVADEL SPECIALTY: Hires Epiq as Claims and Noticing Agent
AXOVANT SCIENCES: Hercules Loan Accord Casts Going Concern Doubt
BACK RIVER: Seeks to Hire Michael D. Pinsky as Attorney

BANTEK INC: Salberg & Company Raises Going Concern Doubt
BERAKAH INVESTMENT: Seeks to Hire Newark Firm as Counsel
BONDARIU INVESTMENTS: Hires Crowley Liberatore as Counsel
CAPE MIAMI 32: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended Until April 23
CAPSTONE TURBINE: Management Discloses Substantial Doubt Exists

CARE PRODUCTS: Seeks to Hire Smith Fankhauser as OCP
CM RESORT: Trustee Seeks to Hire Cavazos Hendricks as Counsel
CRS REPROCESSING: Argosy, et al., Suit vs TCC Moved to Kentucky Ct.
DANIEL BENYAMIN: Ditech Financial's Proof of Claim Expunged
DAYMARK PROPERTIES: March 15 Hearing on Disclosure Statement

DESTINY PETROLEUM: Hires Phillips Murrah as Attorney
DFH NETWORK: Seeks Court Approval of Proposed Plan Outline
DIABETIC SOLUTIONS: Seeks to Hire Mcnaughton as Legal Counsel
DOUBLE JUMP: Seeks to Hire Clark Hill as Bankruptcy Counsel
EASTLAKE INVESTMENTS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

EMMANUEL HEALTH: Hires Filis Law as Special Counsel
ESSA PHARMA: Current Working Capital Casts Going Concern Doubt
FIRSTENERGY SOLUTIONS: March 19 Disclosure Statement Hearing
GAETANO ENTERPRISES: Seeks to Hire Barron & Newburger as Counsel
GB SCIENCES: Incurs $4 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter

GENERAL STEEL: Accumulated Deficit Casts Going Concern Doubt
GIGA WATT: Trustee Hires Lauren Miehe as Consultant
GIGCAPITAL INC: Expected Ongoing Costs Cast Going Concern Doubt
GRATE ENTERPRISES: $1.2M Sale of Morgantown Denny's Resto Approved
GREENE AVENUE: Rightful Owner of Disputed Property, Court Rules

GULFSTREAM DIAGNOSTICS: Hires Munsch Hardt as Bankruptcy Counsel
H N HINCKLEY: $3K Private Sale of 1995 Chevy Kodiak Dump Truck OK'd
H N HINCKLEY: $6K Private Sale of 2001 Great Dane Box Trailer OK'd
H N HINCKLEY: $7K Private Sale of 1991 Chevy Kodiak Boom Truck OK'd
H N HINCKLEY: $8K Private Sale of 1998 Freightliner Tractor Okayed

HENDRIX SCHENCK: March 12 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
HL ACQUISITION: More Capital Requirements Cast Going Concern Doubt
HOOK LINE: R. Jurasek Objects to Disclosure Statement
HOOK LINE: Unsecureds to be Paid $150K at 5% in New Jurasek Plan
HOOK LINE: Unsecureds to Recoup 23% at 6% Under 4th Amended Plan

HOUT FENCING: Seeks to Hire Dale Ely as Auctioneer
ICON CONSTRUCTION: Hires Joyce W. Lindauer as Counsel
IMMUCOR INC: Moody's Lowers CFR to 'Caa1' on Weakened Liquidity
INNOVATION PHARMA: Funding Needed to Continue as Going Concern
ISMAIL ARSLANGIRAY: Plan Admin's $320K Sale of Dupont Stock Okayed

JC PLUMBING: Seeks to Hire Nixon Law as Attorney
KPH CONSTRUCTION: Hires Kerkman & Dunn as Bankruptcy Counsel
L&R DEVELOPMENT: Court Dismisses Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case
LIFE ENHANCEMENT: Creditor Files Limited Objection to Disclosures
LOYSVILLE STRUCTURES: Hires Omar & Merv's as Auctioneer

M.S. MOELLER: April 4 Approval Hearing on Disclosure Statement
MAREMONT CORP: Asbestos Committee Taps Robinson & Cole as Counsel
MAREMONT CORP: Asbestos Panel Taps Legal Analysis as Consultant
MATRIX BROADCASTING: Disclosures OK'd; March 21 Plan Hearing
MEYERS-STERNER INDUSTRIES: Seeks to Hire Stormant as Accountant

MGTF RADIO: Amends Plan to Modify Treatment of Unsecured Claims
MIDWAY OILFIELD: Taps PPL Group as Auctioneer
MMAN LLC: Seeks to Hire Christopher Lee as Attorney
MONROE BUS: Seeks to Hire Goldberg Weprin as Legal Counsel
MONROE BUS: Seeks to Hire Solomon Hirsch as Accountant

MONROE BUS: Seeks to Retain Bruce Levinson as Appellate Counsel
MYOVANT SCIENCES: Needs More Capital to Continue as Going Concern
NEIGHBORS LEGACY: Files Chapter 11 Joint Plan of Liquidation
NFE ATLANTIC: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR & Rates Sec. Term Loan B2
NHSC DINING: Seeks to Hire Robert O Lampl as Legal Counsel

NOVUM PHARMA: Seeks to Hire Cole Schotz as Legal Counsel
NOVUM PHARMA: Seeks to Hire CR3 Partners, Appoint CRO
NOVUM PHARMA: Seeks to Hire Kurtzman as Administrative Agent
NOVUM PHARMA: Seeks to Hire Teneo Capital as Investment Banker
OMNIL CORPORATION: Seeks to Hire Boyer Terry as Counsel

PAYLESS INC: Moody's Lowers PDR to 'D-PD' Amid Bankruptcy Filing
PERNIX SLEEP: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
PUMAS CAB: Unsecured Creditors to Get 9.1% in One Lump Sum Payment
PURE ACQUISITION: WithumSmith+Brown PC Raises Going Concern Doubt
REDEEMED CHR. CHURCH: Plan Outline Hearing Set for April 8

RFS SPORTS: Seeks Approval to Hire PFS as Accountant
S FRANKLIN: Seeks to Hire Purcell, Krug & Haller as Legal Counsel
SANFRED REALTY: Unsecureds to be Paid in Full Over Five Years
SHOOT THE MOON: Court OK's Dennis Conner Bid to Withdraw Claim
SKYMARK PROPERTIES SPE: Taps Wolfson Bolton as Legal Counsel

SQLC SENIOR LIVING: To Sell Assets to Unrelated Third-Party
TATIANA QUINTERO BAIZ: Bid to Terminate Colombian Proceeding Junked
THREE BEARS 8: Seeks to Hire Yacker & Glatt as Legal Counsel
TOYS R US: Court Approves Assignment of Lease to Ollie's
TRIBUS ENTERPRISES: More Capital Needs Cast Going Concern Doubt

TRIDENT CRATING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
TRINIDAD DRILLING: Moody's Withdraws B2 CFR on Debt Repurchase
URUS GROUP: Seeks to Hire Richard Siegmeister as Counsel
VAXART INC: KPMG LLP Raises Going Concern Doubt
WHISTLER ENERGY: Baker Hughes' Bid for Reconsideration Junked

WOODBRIDGE GROUP: Bankruptcy Court Disallows ERC/Brill Claims
WOODBRIDGE GROUP: Liquidation Plan Confirmed, Exits Chapter 11
XPO LOGISTICS: Moody's Rates $1BB Sr. Unsecured Notes 'Ba3'
[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings

                            *********

177 LEFFERTS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-----------------------------------------------
Debtor: 177 Lefferts Place Corp
        931 Lincoln Place
        Brooklyn, NY 11213

Business Description: 177 Lefferts Place Corp is a privatel held
                      company in Brooklyn, New York that is
                      engaged in the business of residential
                      building construction.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn)

Case No.: 19-40967

Judge: Hon. Elizabeth S. Stong

Debtor's Counsel: Francis E. Hemmings, Esq.
                  HEMMINGS & SNELL LLP
                  30 Wall Street, 8th Floor
                  New York, NY 10005
                  Tel: (212) 747-9560
                  Fax: (212) 747-9564
                  E-mail: general@hemmingssnell.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Ronald Fraser, vice president.

The Debtor stated it has no unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb19-40967.pdf


A&R COMPLETE: Seeks to Hire Timothy Thomas as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
A&R Complete Service, Corp., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada to employ the Law
Office of Timothy Thomas, LLC, as counsel to the Debtor.

A&R Complete requires Timothy Thomas to:

   a. provide legal advice as to the Debtor's rights and
      obligations, and performance of duties as a debtor-in-
      possession during the administration of this bankruptcy
      case;

   b. represent the Debtor in all proceedings before the
      Bankruptcy Court; and

   c. assist the Debtor in evaluating its legal positions and
      strategy and assistance in performing its duties in the
      Bankruptcy Code.

Timothy Thomas will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates.

Prior to the filing of the Chapter 11 case, Timothy Thomas received
a pre-petition retainer if $12,500.

Timothy Thomas will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Timothy P. Thomas, Esq., partner of the Law Office of Timothy
Thomas, LLC, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estates.

Timothy Thomas can be reached at:

     Timothy P. Thomas, Esq.
     LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY THOMAS, LLC
     1771 E. Flamingo Rd. B-212
     Las Vegas, NV 89119
     Tel: (702) 227-0011
     E-mail: tthomas@tthomaslaw.com

              About A&R Complete Service, Corp.

A&R Complete Service, Inc., based in Las Vegas, NV, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 19-10321) on Jan. 21, 2019.
In the petition signed by David L. Snipes III, president, the
Debtor estimated $0 to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  The Hon. Mike K. Nakagawa oversees the
case.  Timothy P. Thomas, Esq., at the Law Office of Timothy
Thomas, LLC, serves as bankruptcy counsel.  



ACETO CORP: Files Chapter 11 to Sell Chemicals Business for $338MM
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACETO Corporation, an international company engaged in the
development, marketing, sale and distribution of Human Health
products, Pharmaceutical Ingredients and Performance Chemicals, has
entered into a "stalking-horse" asset purchase agreement with an
affiliate of New Mountain Capital to sell its chemicals business
assets for gross proceeds of $338 million in cash, plus the
assumption of certain liabilities and subject to certain
adjustments, on a cash-free and debt-free basis.

To facilitate the sale and satisfy its debt obligations, Aceto and
its U.S. subsidiaries have filed voluntary petitions under Chapter
11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey (Newark). Aceto's foreign chemicals business
subsidiaries are not included in the filing but will be included in
the sale.  In addition, Aceto intends to enter into a stalking
horse agreement for its subsidiary, Rising Pharmaceuticals.  Aceto
expects to complete the dispositions of its chemicals and Rising
businesses before its fiscal year end on June 30, 2019.

The sale will be conducted under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code.

"For the past several months, the Board has been conducting a
comprehensive evaluation of strategic alternatives to address the
Company's debt burden in consultation with its financial and legal
advisors while continuing to work cooperatively with its lenders.
After assessing its options, the Board has determined that
Court-supervised sales of Aceto's chemicals business assets and its
subsidiary Rising Pharmaceuticals are in the best interest of the
Company and its stakeholders," said William C. Kennally III, Chief
Executive Officer of Aceto.  "This decision provides stability and
deep capital resources to the Company and, importantly, ensures the
continuity of customer, partner and supplier relationships critical
to the Company's businesses operations and success."

Aceto will operate its business in the ordinary course while it
completes the sales of its chemicals business assets and its
subsidiary Rising Pharmaceuticals.   To that end, Aceto has
received a commitment for debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing of
$60 million from a syndicate of lenders led by Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. The DIP financing will finance Aceto's working capital needs
through the completion of the sales transactions and support
payments to vendors and suppliers for post-petition purchases in
the ordinary course.  

The proposed sales will be conducted through Court-supervised
processes under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, subject to
Court-approved bidding procedures, potential receipt of higher and
better offers at auction and approval by the Court.  

                     Asset Purchase Agreement

On February 18, 2019, the Company and certain of its U.S.
subsidiaries entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with NMC
Atlas, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, an affiliate of New
Mountain Capital, L.L.C., pursuant to which NMC Atlas agreed to
acquire substantially all of the assets and assume certain
liabilities of the Pharmaceutical Ingredients and Performance
Chemicals segments and the Nutritionals portion of the Human Health
segment of the Company pursuant to Sections 363 and 365 of the
Bankruptcy Code for an aggregate purchase price of $338 million in
cash plus the assumption of certain liabilities (as set forth in
the Asset Purchase Agreement), subject to adjustments with respect
to net current assets at closing.

The Asset Purchase Agreement is intended to constitute a "stalking
horse" bid that is subject to higher and better bids by third
parties in accordance with bidding procedures to be approved by the
Bankruptcy Court.

The Asset Purchase Agreement requires the Debtors to obtain
Bankruptcy Court approval of the bidding procedures by April 1,
2019 and the Sale Order on or before 45 days after the Bankruptcy
Court's entry of the bidding procedures.

                    About New Mountain Capital

New Mountain Capital -- http://www.newmountaincapital.com/-- is a
New York based investment firm that emphasizes business  uilding
and growth, rather than debt, as it pursues long-term capital
appreciation.  The firm currently manages private equity, public
equity, and credit funds with more than $20 billion in assets under
management. New Mountain seeks out what it believes to be the
highest quality growth leaders in carefully selected industry
sectors and then works intensively with management to build the
value of these companies.

                        About ACETO Corp.

ACETO Corporation (NASDAQ: ACET), incorporated in 1947, is focused
on the global marketing, sale and distribution of Human Health
products (finished dosage form generics and nutraceutical
products), Pharmaceutical Ingredients (pharmaceutical intermediates
and active pharmaceutical ingredients) and Performance Chemicals
(specialty chemicals and agricultural protection products).  The
Company employs approximately 180 people.

With business operations in nine countries, ACETO distributes more
than 1,100 chemical compounds used principally as finished products
or raw materials in the pharmaceutical, nutraceutical,
agricultural, coatings and industrial chemical industries. ACETO's
global operations, including a staff of 25 in China and 12 in
India, are distinctive in the industry and enable its worldwide
sourcing and regulatory capabilities.

Aceto Corporation and eight affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-13448) on Feb. 19, 2019.

ACETO disclosed assets of $753,159,000 and liabilities of
$702,848,000 as of Dec. 31, 2018.

The Hon. Vincent F. Papalia is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP as counsel; SIMMONS &
SIMMONS as foreign counsel; PJT PARTNERS LP is the investment
banker and financial advisor; AP SERVICES LLC as restructuring
advisor and provider of the CRO; and PRIME CLERK LLC is the claims
and noticing agent.


ACETO CORP: Has $60 Million of DIP Financing
--------------------------------------------
ACETO Corp., which has sought bankruptcy protection to sell its
chemicals business for $338 million to New Mountain Capital, said
in a regulatory filing that the company and certain of its U.S.
subsidiaries will enter into a Senior Secured, Priming and
Superprioity Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement with the lenders
party thereto from time to time and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent for the DIP Lenders.

The DIP Credit Agreement is subject to approval of the Bankruptcy
Court and will become effective upon, in addition to other
customary closing conditions, the entry of an interim court order.
The DIP Credit Agreement provides for a $60 million of
debtor-in-possession revolving credit facility.

Pursuant to the terms of the DIP Credit Agreement, interest will
accrue on the principal balance of the DIP Loans (as defined in the
DIP Credit Agreement) at a rate per annum equal to (a) LIBOR for
such interest period plus 7.00% in respect of Eurodollar Loans (as
defined in the DIP Credit Agreement) and (b) the alternate base
rate plus 6.00% in respect of ABR Borrowings (as defined in the DIP
Credit Agreement).

                        About ACETO Corp.

ACETO Corporation (NASDAQ: ACET), incorporated in 1947, is focused
on the global marketing, sale and distribution of Human Health
products (finished dosage form generics and nutraceutical
products), Pharmaceutical Ingredients (pharmaceutical intermediates
and active pharmaceutical ingredients) and Performance Chemicals
(specialty chemicals and agricultural protection products).  The
Company employs approximately 180 people.

With business operations in nine countries, ACETO distributes over
1,100 chemical compounds used principally as finished products or
raw materials in the pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, agricultural,
coatings and industrial chemical industries. ACETO's global
operations, including a staff of 25 in China and 12 in India, are
distinctive in the industry and enable its worldwide sourcing and
regulatory capabilities.

Aceto Corporation and eight affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-13448) on Feb. 19, 2019.

ACETO disclosed assets of $753,159,000 and liabilities of
$702,848,000 as of Dec. 31, 2018.

The Hon. Vincent F. Papalia is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP as counsel; SIMMONS &
SIMMONS as foreign counsel; PJT PARTNERS LP is the investment
banker and financial advisor; AP SERVICES LLC as restructuring
advisor and provider of the CRO; and PRIME CLERK LLC is the claims
and noticing agent.



ACETO CORPORATION: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: Aceto Corporation
             4 Tri Harbor Court
             Port Washington, NY 11050

Business Description: Aceto Corporation, together with its debtor
                      and non-debtor domestic and foreign
                      affiliates, has business operations in ten
                      countries and is engaged in the development,

                      marketing, sales and distribution of
                      finished dosage form generic
                      pharmaceuticals, nutraceutical products,
                      pharmaceutical active ingredients and
                      intermediates, specialty performance
                      chemicals inclusive of agricultural
                      intermediates and agricultural protection
                      products.  Aceto was incorporated in 1947 in
                      the State of New York.  Aceto is a publicly-
                      traded company and trades its common stock
                      on the NASDAQ Global Select Market using the
                      symbol "ACET".  As of the Petition Date, the
                      Debtors employ approximately 180 people.
                      Visit http://www.aceto.comfor more
                      information.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of New Jersey (Newark)

Nine affiliates that simultaneously filed voluntary petitions
seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                      Case No.
     ------                                      --------
     Aceto Corporation (Lead Case)               19-13448
     Rising Pharmaceuticals, Inc.                19-13447
     Aceto Agricultural Chemicals Corp.          19-13449
     Aceto Realty LLC                            19-13450
     Rising Health, LLC                          19-13451
     Acetris Health, LLC                         19-13452
     PACK Pharmaceuticals, LLC                   19-13453
     Arsynco, Inc.                               19-13454
     Acci Realty Corp.                           19-13455

Judge: Hon. Vincent F. Papalia

Debtors' Counsel: Kenneth A. Rosen, Esq.
                  Michael S. Etkin, Esq.
                  Paul Kizel, Esq.
                  Jeffrey Cohen, Esq.
                  Philip J. Gross, Esq.
                  LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP
                  One Lowenstein Drive
                  Roseland, New Jersey 07068
                  Tel: (973) 597-2500
                  Fax: (973) 597-2400
                  Email: krosen@lowenstein.com
                         metkin@lowenstein.com
                         pkizel@lowenstein.com
                         jcohen@lowenstein.com
                         pgross@lowenstein.com

Debtors'
Special
Foreign
Counsel:          SIMMONS & SIMMONS

Debtors'
Investment
Banker and
Financial
Advisor:          PJT PARTNERS LP

Debtors'
Restructuring
Advisors:         AP SERVICES LLC

Debtors'
Notice &
Claims Agent and
Administrative
Advisor:          PRIME CLERK LLC
                  https://cases.primeclerk.com/aceto

Total Assets as of Dec. 31, 2018
(on a consolidated basis):             $753,159,000

Total Liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2018
(on a consolidated basis):             $702,848,000

The petition was signed by Rebecca A. Roof, chief financial
officer.

A full-text copy of Aceto Corporation's petition is available for
free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb19-13448.pdf

Consolidated List of Debtors' 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
Citibank, N.A.                        Unsecured       $143,750,000
Address Listing #1:               Convertible Notes
480 Washington Blvd.,
18th Floor Jersey City, N.J. 07310
Attention: Agency and Trust
Address Listing #2:
388 Greenwich Street 14th Floor
New York, NY 10013
Attention: Agency & Trust

Aurobindo Pharma Ltd                  Trade Debt       $40,979,501
6 Wheeling Road
Dayton, NJ 08810 US

Thinq Pharma                          Trade Debt        $7,495,726
111 North Bridge Road 16‐04
Peninsula Plaza 179098 SG

Aurolife Pharma LLC                   Trade Debt        $6,660,474
6 Wheeling Road
Dayton, NJ 08810 US

Walgreens ‐ FTS "Settlement"           Customer        
$3,591,312
104 Wilmot Road, Ms# 1425            Obligations
Deerfield, IL 60015 US

Apicore LLC                           Trade Debt        $2,273,030
49 Napoleon Court
Somerset, NJ 08873 US

Ricon Pharma LLC                      Trade Debt        $1,798,862
100 Ford Road Suite 9
Denville, NJ 07834 US

Ingenus                               Trade Debt        $1,368,910
140 New Dutch Lane
Fairfield, NJ 07004 US

Natco Pharma Ltd                      Trade Debt        $1,305,145
2 Road Banjara Hills
Hyderabad 500034 IN

OIC, LLC                              Trade Debt        $1,023,215
7500 Flying Cloud Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 US

Lyne                                  Trade Debt          $953,900
10 Burke Drive
Brockton, MA 02301 US

Validus Pharmaceutical                Trade Debt          $790,755
119 Cherry Hill Rd. Suite 310
Parsippany, NJ 07054 US

FDC LIMITED                           Trade debt          $690,775
142‐48 S.V. Road Jogeshwari (W)
Mumbai 400 102 IN

Time‐Cap Labs Inc.                    Trade Debt         
$635,168
7 Michael Ave
Farmingdale, NY 11735 US

BI Nutraceuticals                     Trade Debt          $416,858
120 Hoffman Lane
Willow Island, WV 26134 US

American Regent, Inc.                 Trade Debt          $392,356
5 Ramsey Rd
Shirley, NY 11967 US

Virupaksha Organics Ltd.              Trade Debt          $363,980
Village, Jinnaram Mandal
Medak District Telangana 502319 IN

Divi's Laboratories Limited           Trade Debt          $348,000
Divi Towers 7‐1‐77/E/1/303
Dharam Karan Road Hanegev 85455 IN

Chem‐Inter Corporation                Trade Debt         
$337,299
8‐4, 2‐Chome, Kanda Tsukasa‐
Cho Chidoda‐Ku Tokyo 10110048 JP

Contract Pharmacal Corp.              Trade Debt          $297,272
135 Adams Avenue
Hauppauge, NY 11788 US

Appco Pharma LLC                      Trade Debt          $290,505
120 Belmont Drive
Somerset, NJ 08873 US

United Phosphorous                    Trade Debt          $288,792
630 Freedom Center
King of Prussia, PA 19408 US

Invagen Pharmaceuticals, Inc          Trade Debt          $272,681
7 Oser Ave Hauppauge, NY 11788 US

Aurobindo Pharma USA                  Trade Debt          $259,923
6 Wheeling Road
Dayton, NJ 08810 US

Omnichem N.V.                         Trade Debt          $259,387
Cooppallaan 91 Westerhorn 25364 DE

Archon Vitamin Corp.                  Trade Debt          $256,022
3775 Park Ave. Unit 1
Edison., NJ 08820‐2505 US

Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited       Trade Debt          $255,000
Alembic Road Vadodara
Gujarat 390003 IN

Bodal Chemicals Ltd.                  Trade Debt          $241,766
Plot No. 123‐124, Phase ‐I,
Gidc, Vatva, Ahmedabad
Gujarat 382445 IN

Murty                                 Trade Debt          $220,508
518 Codell Drive
Lexington, KY 40509 US

Sakai Trading New York Inc.           Trade Debt          $213,010
10 Grand Central 155 East 44Th Street,
16th Floor New York, NY 10017 US


AINA LE'A: Committee Seeks to Expand Scope of Work of Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Aina Le'a, Inc.
has filed an amended application with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Hawaii seeking approval to retain Case Lombardi &
Pettit, as bankruptcy counsel to the Committee.

The Committee requires Case Lombardi to provide expert witness
services concerning the land use action plan proposed by Debtor's
Plan of Reorganization as may be needed in connection with
confirmation of the Plan.

Case Lombardi will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners                    $315-$650
     Associates                     $240
     Paralegals                     $185

Ted N. Pettit, director of Case Lombardi & Pettit, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and (a) is not
creditors, equity security holders or insiders of the Debtor; (b)
has not been, within two years before the date of the filing of the
Debtor's chapter 11 petition, directors, officers or employees of
the Debtor; and (c) does not have an interest materially adverse to
the interest of the estate or of any class of creditors or equity
security holders, by reason of any direct or indirect relationship
to, connection with, or interest in, the Debtor, or for any other
reason.

Case Lombardi can be reached at:

     Ted N. Pettit, Esq.
     CASE LOMBARDI & PETTIT
     737 Bishop Street, Suite 2600
     Honolulu, HI 96813
     Tel: (808) 547-5400
     Fax: (808) 523-1888
     E-mail: tpettit@caselombardi.com

                     About Aina Le'a, Inc.

Aina Le'a, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
D.HI. Case No. 17-00611) on June 22, 2017.   In the petition signed
by Robert Wessels, CEO, the Debtor estimated $100 million to $500
million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities.

Choi & Ito is the Debtor's counsel.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Aina Le'a, Inc.,
hired Case Lombardi & Pettit, as attorneys.


ALLEN SUPPLY: Seeks to Hire Beechwood Capital as Business Broker
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Allen Supply & Laundry Service, Inc. seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey to hire
Beechwood Capital Advisors.

The firm will act as business broker in connection with the sale,
merger, consolidation or any other business combination involving
all or a portion of the stock, assets or business of the Debtor.

Beechwood will receive a work fee of $2,000 upon court approval of
its employment with the Debtor, and $2,000 per month thereafter.  A
work fee of $1,000 per month will be added to the "success fee" for
each month the firm is retained.  The work fee will be paid for a
minimum of three months and 50% of the retainers will be credited
back to the success fee if the success fee exceeds $75,000.

In the event a sale transaction is consummated, the firm will
receive a "success fee" to be paid as follows:

(1) a minimum fee of $75,000; plus

(2) 5% of the transaction value in excess of $1.5 million; plus  

(3) an additional work fee of $1,000 per month less 50% of the work
fee paid.

Richard Conroy, a member of Beechwood, attests that his firm is
disinterested under section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The broker can be reached through:

     Richard Conroy
     Beechwood Capital Advisors
     51 JFK Parkway, First Floor West
     Short Hills, NJ 07078
     Phone: +1-973-264-9952

               About Allen Supply & Laundry Service

Founded in 1920, The Allen Supply & Laundry Service, Inc., provides
dry cleaning and laundry services.  The Allen Supply & Laundry
Service sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-10132) on Jan. 3, 2019.  At the time of
the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10
million and liabilities of less than $1 million.  The case is
assigned to Judge John K. Sherwood.  Wasserman, Jurista & Stolz,
P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.


AMERICAN GREEN: Trustee Hires Claro Group as Financial Advisor
--------------------------------------------------------------
William R. Greendyke, the Chapter 11 Trustee of American Green
Technology, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas to employ The Claro Group, LLC, as
financial advisor to the Trustee.

The Trustee requires Claro Group to:

   a. assist the Trustee in developing and executing a process
      for marketing and selling any or all of its assets;

   b. provide assistance to the Trustee in analyzing any
      potential business plan(s) and the operational and
      financial condition of the debtor entities generally,
      including for each individual operating segment, if
      necessary;

   c. provide assistance to the Trustee in evaluating
      reorganization strategies and alternatives available to the
      Trustee for the business and its assets, including
      any asset sale transactions;

   d. provide assistance to the Trustee in identifying and
      implementing potential cost containment opportunities to
      improve the cash flow and ultimate value of the estate and
      its assets;

   e. provide assistance to the Trustee in identifying and
      implementing any potential asset redeployment
      opportunities;

   f. provide assistance to the Trustee in analyzing assumption
      and rejection issues regarding executory contracts and
      leases and the potential impact on the financial and
      operational condition of the business;

   g. provide assistance to the Trustee in developing the
      financial projections and assumptions for the business and
      its assets, including at the operating segment level, if
      necessary;

   h. provide assistance to the Trustee in preparing any
      enterprise, asset or necessary;

   i. provide assistance to the Trustee in preparing any
      documents necessary for confirmation; including the plan(s)
      or reorganization and the disclosure statement(s);

   j. provide advice and assistance to the Trustee in
      negotiations and meetings with the creditors, secured
      lenders and other parties of interest;

   k. provide advice and assistance to the Trustee relative to
      the potential tax consequences of any proposed plan of
      reorganization; and

   l. provide such other services as may be required by the
      Trustee.

Claro Group will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Managing Directors                $570-$640
     Directors/Senior Advisors         $490-$530
     Managers/Senior Managers          $390-$435
     Analysts/Senior Consultants       $250-$335
     Administrative Staff              $125-$175

Claro will be paid a fixed monthly fee equal to $25,000.

Claro Group will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Douglas J. Brickley, a partner at The Claro Group, LLC, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Claro Group can be reached at:

     Douglas J. Brickley
     THE CLARO GROUP, LLC
     711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2100
     Houston , TX 77002
     Tel: (713) 454-7730
     Fax: (713) 236-0033

              About American Green Technology

American Green Technology Inc., also known as American Green
Technology TM, is a manufacturer of lighting products for the heavy
industry and healthcare sector. It is headquartered in South Bend,
Indiana.

On August 28, 2018, AirGuide Mfg. MS, LLC, Lai Family Investments,
Inc., and Dave Peterson, as petitioning creditors, filed an
involuntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No.
18-34728) against the Debtor. The petitioning creditors are
represented by Deirdre Carey Brown, Esq., an attorney based in
Houston, Texas.

On December 20, 2019, the court approved the appointment of William
R. Greendyke as Chapter 11 trustee.  The Claro Group, LLC, is the
financial advisor.



AMERICANN INC: Incurs First Quarter Net Loss of $538,508
--------------------------------------------------------
Americann, Inc., has filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $538,508 for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a
net loss of $1.37 million for the same period in 2017.  The
decrease in net loss is attributable to changes in operating
expenses and interest income and expense.

During the three months ended Dec. 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company
generated $0 and $0 in revenue, respectively.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had $9.95 million in total assets,
$2.50 million in total liabilities, and $7.44 million in total
stockholders' equity.

During the three months ended Dec. 31, 2018, the Company's net cash
flows used in operations were $534,409 as compared to net cash
flows used in operations of $628,639 for the three months ended
Dec. 31, 2017.  The decrease is primarily due to the timing of
working capital payments and amortization of debt discounts during
the three months ended Dec. 31, 2017.

Cash flows used in investing activities were $21,138 for the three
months ended Dec. 31, 2018, consisting of additions to construction
in progress and payments on notes receivables.  Cash flows provided
by investing activities were $1,153 for the three months ended Dec.
31, 2017, consisting of additions to construction in progress.

Cash flows provided by financing activities were $1,045,500 for the
three months ended Dec. 31, 2018, consisting of common stock issued
for cash and proceeds from the exercise of warrants.  Cash flows
provided by financing activities were $1,726,000 for the three
months ended Dec. 31, 2017, consisting of proceeds from notes
payable.

The Company sold its property in Denver, Colorado, yielding
proceeds of $1,608,451 which were used to pay down existing debt,
which is reflected as a noncash financing and investing activity in
its statement of cash flows for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2017.

The Company does not have any firm commitments from any person to
provide it with any capital.

The Company had an accumulated deficit of $13,648,049 and
$13,109,541 at Dec. 31, 2018, and Sept. 30, 2018, respectively, and
incurred a net loss for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2018.
These matters, among others, raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  While the
Company is attempting to generate revenue, the Company's cash
position may not be significant enough to support the Company's
daily operations.  Management intends to raise additional funds
through the sale of its securities.  Further, the amount due from
Wellness Group Pharms of $1,761,675 (before an allowance of
$977,770) may not be collectible.  On Jan. 18, 2018, the
arbitration panel awarded the Company $1,045,000 plus interest at
the rate of 18% per year from April 18, 2015 to Jan. 18, 2018 for
$550,000.  In addition to the principal and interest awarded of
$1,595,000, the Company was also awarded its attorneys' fees and
arbitration fees.  The Company has not collected on the award as of
the filing date.

"Management believes that the actions presently being taken to
further implement its business plan and generate revenue provide
the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.
While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to
generate revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds,
there can be no assurances to that effect.  The ability of the
Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the
Company's ability to further implement its business plan and
generate revenue.  The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to
continue as a going concern," the Company said in the SEC filing.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/NumSdz

                        About Americann

Headquartered in Denver, Colorado, AmeriCann is a specialized
cannabis company that is developing state-of-the-art product
manufacturing and greenhouse cultivation facilities.  Its business
plan is based on the continued growth of the regulated marijuana
market in the United States.  AmeriCann uses greenhouse technology
which is superior to the current industry standard of growing
cannabis in warehouse facilities under artificial lights.

Americann reported a net loss of $4.43 million for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2018, compared to a net loss of $2.77 for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2018, Americann had $9.45 million
in total assets, $2.62 million in total liabilities, and $6.83
million in total stockholders' equity.

MaloneBailey, LLP, the Company's auditor since 2016, issued a
"going concern" opinion in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Sept. 30, 2018, stating that the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has an
accumulated deficit that raise substantial doubt about its ability
to continue as a going concern.


APEX XPRESS: Plan Outline Hearing Scheduled for April 1
-------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Stacey L. Meisel will convene a hearing on April
1, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. to consider the adequacy of Apex Xpress,
Inc.'s disclosure statement referring to its chapter 11 plan.

Written objections to the disclosure statement must be filed no
later than 14 days prior to the hearing.

                      About Apex Xpress

Apex Xpress, Inc., formerly known as Apex Trucking, provides
transportation services.  The Company offers copier, car, and
motorcycle transportation services, as well as warehousing, copier
installation, prepping, flatbed and building services. The Company
has locations in Secaucus, New Jersey, Brooklyn, Maryland and
Brockton, Massachusetts.

Apex Xpress filed for bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No.
18-13134) on Feb. 16, 2018. In the petition signed by Robert M.
Cerchione, president, the Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to
$10 million, and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.

The Hon. Stacey L. Meisel oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP as its legal
counsel, and Argus Management Corporation as its financial
advisor.

On May 19, 2018, an order was entered approving the appointment of
Kenneth J. DeGraw, as the examiner of Apex Xpress.  The Examiner
hired Mellinger Sanders & Sanders, LLC, as his legal counsel, and
Withum Smith & Brown, PC, as his accountant.


AREABEATS PROPERTIES: Hires Restaurant Realty as Broker
-------------------------------------------------------
Areabeats Properties, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of California to employ Restaurant
Realty Company, Inc., as broker to the Debtor.

Areabeats Properties requires Restaurant Realty to market and sell
the Debtor's real property and improvements located at 917-921 4th
Street, San Rafael, CA 94901.

Restaurant Realty will be paid a commission of:

   -- 3% of the sale price; or

   -- 6% of the sale price, if the buyer is represented by a
      licensed agent, to be shared equally between the two
      agents.

Steven D. Zimmerman, director of Restaurant Realty Company, Inc.,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Restaurant Realty can be reached at:

     Steven D. Zimmerman
     RESTAURANT REALTY COMPANY, INC.
     77 Mark Drive, Suite 14
     San Rafael, CA 94903
     Tel: (415) 946-9701
     Fax: (415) 945-9702

                  About Areabeats Properties

AreaBeats Properties, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 18-31137) on Oct.
18, 2018.  It filed as a single asset real estate debtor (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

In the petition signed by Laura van Galen, manager, the Debtor
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  Judge Hannah L. Blumenstiel oversees the
case.  The Debtor tapped the Law Office of Steven M. Olson as its
legal counsel.



ARP FAMILY: Seeks to Hire Integrity Capital as Loan Broker
----------------------------------------------------------
Arp Family Farms, GP and Arp Custom Farming, LLC, seek approval
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona to hire
Integrity Capital, LLC as loan broker.

The firm will assist the Debtors in obtaining financing as part of
their Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

The Debtors have agreed to pay the firm or assign a fee of 1.5% of
the loan amount.  The fee is payable at loan closing.

Integrity Capital has no connection with the Debtors, creditors, or
any other "party in the interest," according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Carl Osberg
     Integrity Capital, LLC
     9237 E. Via De Ventura, Suite 110
     Scottsdale, AZ 85258
     Phone: 480-462-6957

                       About ARP Family Farms

ARP Family Farms G.P. is a privately held company in Chandler,
Arizona that operates in the agricultural industry.

ARP Family Farms, based in Chandler, AZ, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 18-14173 on Nov. 19, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Nathan Arp, manager, Ephesians 3:20 Farms,
LLC, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and
liabilities.  The Hon. Daniel P. Collins presides over the case.
Pernell W. McGuire, Esq., at Davis Miles McGuire Gardner, PLLC,
serves as bankruptcy counsel.


AVADEL SPECIALTY: Hires Epiq as Claims and Noticing Agent
---------------------------------------------------------
Avadel Specialty Pharmaceuticals, LLC, seeks authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to employ Epiq
Corporate Restructuring, LLC, as claims and noticing agent to the
Debtor.

Avadel Specialty requires Epiq to:

   a. prepare and serve required notices and documents in the
      cases in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and the
      Bankruptcy Rules in the form and manner directed by the
      Debtors or the Court, including (i) notice of the
      commencement of the cases and the initial meeting of
      creditors under Bankruptcy Code Sec. 341(a), (ii) notice of
      any claims bar date, (iii) notices of transfers of claims
      and objections to claims, (iv) notices of objections to
      claims and objections to transfers of claims, (v) notices
      of any hearings on a disclosure statement and confirmation
      of the Debtors' plan or plans of reorganization, including
      under Bankruptcy Rule 3017(d), (vi) notice of the effective
      date of any plan, (vii) any motion to convert, dismiss,
      appoint a trustee, or appoint and examiner filed by the
      U.S. Trustee's Office, and (viii) all other notices,
      orders, pleadings, publications and other documents as the
      Debtors or Court may deem necessary or appropriate for an
      orderly administration of the cases;

   b. maintain an official copy of the Debtors' schedules of
      assets and liabilities and statements of financial affairs
      (collectively, "Schedules"), listing the Debtors' known
      creditors and the amounts owed thereto;

   c. maintain (i) a list of all potential creditors, equity
      holders and other parties-in-interest; and (ii) a "Master
      Service List" in accordance with Local Rule 2002-1(H);
      update said lists and make said lists available upon
      request by a party-in-interest or the Clerk;

   d. furnish a notice to all potential creditors of the last
      date for the filing of proofs of claim and a form for the
      filing of a proof of claim, after such notice and form are
      approved by this Court, and notify said potential creditors
      of the existence, amount and classification of their
      respective claims as set forth in the Schedules, which may
      be effected by inclusion of such information (or the lack
      thereof, in cases where the Schedules indicate no debt due
      to the subject party) on a customized proof of claim form
      provided to potential creditors;

   e. maintain a post office box or address for the purpose of
      receiving claims and returned mail, and process all mail
      received;

   f. for all notices, motions, orders or other pleadings or
      documents served, prepare and file or caused to be filed
      with the Clerk an affidavit or certificate of service
      within seven (7) business days of service which includes
      (i) either a copy of the notice served or the docket
      numbers and titles of the pleadings served, (ii) a list of
      persons to whom it was mailed (in alphabetical order) with
      their addresses, (iii) the manner of service, and (iv) the
      date served;

   g. process all proofs of claim or proofs of interest received,
      including those received by the Clerk's Office, and check
      said processing for accuracy, and maintain the original
      proofs of claim or proofs of interest in a secure area;

   h. maintain the official claims register for each Debtor (the
      "Claims Registers") on behalf of the Clerk; upon the
      Clerk's request, provide the Clerk with certified,
      duplicate unofficial Claims Registers; and specify in
      the Claims Registers the following information for each
      claim docketed: (i) the claim number assigned, (ii) the
      date received, (iii) the name and address of the claimant
      and agent, if applicable, who filed the claim, (iv) the
      amount asserted, (v) the asserted classification(s) of the
      claim (e.g., secured, unsecured, priority, etc.), (vi) the
      applicable Debtor, and (vii) any disposition of the claim;

   i. file an updated claims register with the Court, in
      alphabetical or numerical order, upon request and direction
      of the Clerk of the Court;

   j. maintain an electronic platform for purposes of filing
      proofs of claim;

   k. record all transfers of claims and provide any notices of
      such transfers as required by Bankruptcy Rule 3001(e);
      provided, however, that if any evidence of transfer of
      claims is filed with the Court pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule
      3001(e), and if the evidence of transfer or notice thereof
      executed by the parties purports to waive the 21-day notice
      and objection period required under Bankruptcy Rule
      3001(e), then Epiq may process the transfer of claims to
      change the name and address of the claimant of such claim
      to reflect the transfer, and the effective date of such
      transfer will be the date the evidence of such transfer was
      docketed in the case;

   l. relocate, by messenger or overnight delivery, all of the
      court-filed proofs of claim to the offices of the Claims
      and Noticing Agent, not less than weekly;

   m. upon completion of the docketing process for all claims
      received to date for each case, turn over to the Clerk
      copies of the claims register for the Clerk's review, upon
      the Clerk's request;

   n. monitor the Court's docket for all notices of appearance,
      address changes, and claims-related pleadings and orders
      filed and make necessary notations on or changes to the
      claims register;

   o. assist in the dissemination of information to the public
      and respond to requests for administrative information
      regarding the case as directed by the Debtors or the Court,
      including through the use of a case website or call center;

   p. provide such other related claims and noticing services as
      the Debtors may require in connection with these Chapter 11
      Cases;

   q. if a case is converted to chapter 7, contact the Clerk's
      Office within three (3) days of the notice to Claims and
      Noticing Agent of entry of the order converting the case;

   r. thirty (30) days prior to the close of these Chapter 11
      Cases, to the extent practicable, request that the Debtors
      submit to the Court a proposed Order dismissing the Claims
      and Noticing Agent and terminating the services of such
      agent upon completion of its duties and responsibilities
      and upon the closing of these cases;

   s. within fourteen (14) days of entry of an Order dismissing a
      case or within thirty (30) days of entry of a Final Decree,
      (a) forward to the Clerk an electronic version of all
      imaged claims; (b) upload the creditor mailing list into
      CM/ECF and (c) docket a Final Claims Register. If a case
      has jointly-administered entities, one combined register
      shall be docketed in the lead case containing claims of all
      cases. The Claims and Noticing Agent shall further box and
      transport all original claims to the Atlanta Federal
      Records Center, 4712 Southpark Blvd, Ellenwood, GA 30294
      and docket a completed SF-135 Form indicating the accession
      and location numbers of the archived claims; and

   t. within fourteen (14) days of entry of an Order converting a
      case, (a) forward to the Clerk an electronic version of all
      imaged claims; (b) upload the creditor mailing list into
      CM/ECF and (c) docket a Final Claims Register. If a case
      has jointly-administered entities, one combined register
      shall be docketed in the lead case containing claims of all
      cases. A Final Claims Register shall also be docketed in
      each jointly-administered case containing the claims of
      only that specific case. The Claims and Noticing Agent
      shall further box and transport all original claims to the
      Atlanta Federal Records Center, 4712 Southpark Blvd,
      Ellenwood, GA 30294 and docket a completed SF-135 Form
      indicating the accession and location numbers of the
      archived claims.

   u. upon conversion of a chapter 11 case to a chapter 7 case,
      if there are more than two hundred (200) creditors, the
      Claims and Noticing Agent shall (i) continue to serve all
      notices required to be served, at the direction of the
      chapter 7 trustee or the Clerk's office or (ii) submit a
      termination order. If a termination order has been granted,
      the Claims and Noticing Agent shall comply with Local Rule
      2002-1(f)(x).

Epiq will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Executives                                 No Charge
     Executive Vice President, Solicitation     $215
     Solicitation Consultant                    $190
     Consultants/ Directors/Vice Presidents     $160–$190
     Case Managers                              $70-$165
     IT/Programming                             $65–$85
     Clerical/Administrative Support            $25–$45

Epiq will be paid a retainer in the amount of $25,000.

Epiq will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred.

Brian Karpuk, director of Consulting Services of Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC, assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtor and its estates.

Epiq can be reached at:

     Brian Karpuk
     EPIQ CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING, LLC
     777 Third Ave., 12th Floor
     New York, NY 10017
     Tel: (646)282-2595

           About Avadel Specialty Pharmaceuticals

Avadel Specialty Pharmaceuticals, LLC is a pharmaceutical company
whose sole commercial product is the FDA-approved NOCTIVA. NOCTIVA
is a prescription medicine nasal (nose) spray used in adults who
wake up two or more times during the night to urinate due to a
condition called nocturnal polyuria.

ASP is a special purpose entity and wholly owned subsidiary of
Dublin, Ireland-based Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (Nasdaq:AVDL).
Avadel plc is a specialty pharmaceutical company that distributes
and markets pharmaceutical products focused on the central nervous
system (CNS) / sleep, and hospital markets.

ASP sought Chapter 11 relief (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 19-10248) on
Feb. 6, 2019. The Debtor disclosed total assets of $79.67 million
and liabilities of $167.39 million as of Dec. 31, 2018.

The Hon. Christopher S. Sontchi is the case judge.

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.  MCA FINANCIAL
GROUP, LTD., is the investment banker.  EPIQ CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING, LLC, is the claims and noticing agent.


AXOVANT SCIENCES: Hercules Loan Accord Casts Going Concern Doubt
----------------------------------------------------------------
Axovant Sciences Ltd. filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $34,296,000 on $0 of revenue for the three
months ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $57,902,000
on $0 of revenue for the same period in 2017.

At Dec. 31, 2018 the Company had total assets of $96,216,000, total
liabilities of $73,456,000, and $22,760,000 in total stockholders'
equity.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company's cash and cash equivalents
totaled $84.9 million.  For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018
and the three and nine-months ended December 31, 2018, the Company
incurred net losses of $221.6 million, $34.3 million and $120.0
million, respectively.  As of December 31, 2018, the Company had
aggregate net interest-bearing indebtedness of $48.8 million, of
which $20.6 million was due within one year.  The Company also had
$24.6 million of other non-interest-bearing current liabilities due
within one year.

Gregory Weinhoff (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial
Officer) states, "The Company's Loan Agreement with Hercules
Capital, Inc. requires that the Company maintain a minimum cash
balance, which was previously $35.0 million, but has been reduced
to $30.0 million following the achievement of certain clinical
milestones as set forth in the Loan Agreement.  The Company
anticipates that its current cash and cash equivalent balances will
not be sufficient to maintain compliance with the minimum liquidity
financial covenant under its Loan Agreement beyond the one-year
period following the date that these unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements were issued if the Loan Agreement
is not amended or an additional financing is not completed.
Failure to meet this minimum covenant would be considered an event
of default under the Loan Agreement and could result in the
acceleration of the Company's existing indebtedness.  These factors
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern for the one-year period following the date that
these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were
issued."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/nwtIEM

Axovant Sciences Ltd., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company,
engages in acquisition, development, and commercialization of
therapeutics in the fields of neurology and psychiatry in the
United States and the European Union.  It focuses on developing
AXO-Lenti-PD, an in vivo lentiviral gene therapy investigational
product candidate for the one-time treatment of Parkinson's
disease.  The company is also developing nelotanserin, a selective
5-HT2A receptor inverse agonist, which is in Phase II clinical
trial for the treatment of visual hallucinations in patients with
Lewy body dementia (LBD) and REM sleep behavior disorder in
patients with LBD.  In addition, it focuses on developing RVT-104,
a combination of rivastigmine and a peripheral muscarinic receptor
antagonist as treatments for patients with Alzheimer's disease or
DLB.  The company was formerly known as Roivant Neurosciences Ltd.
and changed its name to Axovant Sciences Ltd. in March 2015.  The
company was founded in 2014 and is based in London, the United
Kingdom.  Axovant Sciences Ltd. is a subsidiary of Roivant Sciences
Ltd.



BACK RIVER: Seeks to Hire Michael D. Pinsky as Attorney
-------------------------------------------------------
Back River Hope, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York to employ Michael D.
Pinsky, P.C., as attorney to the Debtor.

Back River requires Michael D. Pinsky to:

   a. give legal advice regarding the powers and duties of a
      debtor-in-possession in the continued operation of its
      business and the appropriate management of estate property;

   b. prepare all records and reports as required by the
      Bankruptcy Rules and the Local Bankruptcy Rules of the
      Southern District of New York, and the operating guidelines
      of the Office of the U.S. Trustee;

   c. assist in the determination of the value of property of the
      estate, the treatment of secured debt, the resolution of
      claims, the defense of motions for modification of the
      automatic stay, the provision of adequate protection; the
      disposition of property; and the treatment of claims in
      connection with a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization;

   d. negotiate and prepare all necessary and appropriate
      applications and proposed orders to be submitted to the
      Bankruptcy Court, including applications for the use of
      cash collateral, the retention of professionals, payment of
      critical vendors, maintenance of utility service, the sale
      of estate property, post-petition financing, and other
      applications pertinent to the successful resolution of the
      bankruptcy case;

   e. examine proofs of claim and the prosecution of objections
      to certain such claims;

   f. provide legal advice and prepare documents in connection
      with reorganization, including the formulation and
      preparation of a disclosure statement and plan of
      reorganization;

   g. represent the estate's interest in adversary proceedings;
      and

   h. provide all other matters reasonably necessary to
      restructure the Debtor's indebtedness and reorganize its
      financial affairs in the bankruptcy case.

Michael D. Pinsky will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Counsels               $400
     Paralegals             $100

Michael D. Pinsky will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Michael D. Pinsky, partner of Michael D. Pinsky, P.C., assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Michael D. Pinsky can be reached at:

     Michael D. Pinsky, Esq.
     MICHAEL D. PINSKY, P.C.
     372 Fullerton Ave.
     Newburgh, NY 12550
     Tel: (845) 245-6001

              About Back River Hope, Inc.

Back River Hope, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-35155) on Feb. 4, 2019.  The Debtor
hired Michael D. Pinsky, P.C., as attorney.


BANTEK INC: Salberg & Company Raises Going Concern Doubt
--------------------------------------------------------
Bantek, Inc., f/k/a Drone USA, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission its annual report on Form 10-K, disclosing
a net loss of $5,774,867 on $18,389,568 of sales for the year ended
Sep. 30, 2018, compared to a net income of $7,826,933 on
$24,589,761 of sales for the year ended in 2017.

The audit report of Salberg & Company, P.A. states that the Company
has a net loss and cash used in operations of $5,774,867 and
$794,369, respectively, for the year ended September 30, 2018 and
has a working capital deficit, stockholders' deficit and
accumulated deficit of $12,170,117, $9,157,344 and $19,631,292
respectively, at September 30, 2018.  The Company is also in
default on certain promissory notes.  These matters raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.

The Company's balance sheet at Sep. 30, 2018, showed total assets
of $6,152,938, total liabilities of $15,310,282, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $9,157,344.

A copy of the Form 10-K is available at:

                       https://is.gd/ttmXof

Bantek, Inc., an unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and related
services and technology company, focuses on the distribution and
integration of advanced low altitude UAV systems, services, and
products worldwide.  It also provides product procurement,
distribution, and logistics services.  In addition, the company
offers drone operator training services; and licensed piloted
services, such as search and rescue, utility inspection, real
estate marketing, construction, engineering, and agriculture.
Further, it supplies spare and replacement parts to various federal
government agencies, military prime contractors, and commercial
customers; and resells insulation jackets to cover mechanical
system components, such as valves, steam traps, heat exchangers,
flanges, and other mechanical system components.  The company was
formerly known as Drone USA, Inc. and changed its name to Bantek,
Inc. in April 2018.  Bantek, Inc. is headquartered in Pine Brook,
New Jersey.



BERAKAH INVESTMENT: Seeks to Hire Newark Firm as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Berakah Investment Solutions, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas to employ A
Newark Firm, as counsel to the Debtor.

Berakah Investment requires Newark Firm to represent and provide
legal services to the Debtor in relation to the Chapter 11
bankruptcy proceeding.

Newark Firm will be paid at these hourly rates:

         Attorneys            $400
         Paralegals            $95

The Firm has been paid a retainer of $1,287.

Newark Firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Robert C. Newark, III, a partner at A Newark Firm, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Newark Firm can be reached at:

     Robert C. Newark, III, Esq.
     A NEWARK FIRM
     1341 W. Mockingbird Lane, Ste 600W
     Dallas, TX 75247
     Tel: (866) 230-7236
     Fax: (888) 316-3398
     E-mail: office@newarkfirm.com

               About Berakah Investment Solutions

Berakah Investment Solutions is a privately owned company that
leases real estate.  The Company is the fee simple owner of nine
properties in Texas having a total current value of $1.94 million.

Berakah Investment Solutions, LLC, doing business as DFW Lease
Option, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No.
19-30473) on Feb. 4, 2019.  The Debtor disclosed total assets of
$1,983,499 and total liabilities of $1,648,148 as of the bankruptcy
filing.  The Hon. Barbara J. Houser is the case judge.  Robert C.
Newark, III, Esq., in Dallas, serves as counsel to the Debtor.


BONDARIU INVESTMENTS: Hires Crowley Liberatore as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Bondariu Investments, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to employ Crowley
Liberatore Ryan & Brogan, P.C., as counsel to the Debtor.

Bondariu Investments requires Crowley Liberatore to:

   a. prepare the petition, lists, schedules and statements
      required by the Bankruptcy Code; the pleadings, motions,
      notices and orders required for the orderly administration
      of the estate and to ensure the progress of this case; and
      to consult with and advise the Debtor in the reorganization
      of its financial affairs;

   b. prepare for, prosecute, defend, and represent the Debtor's
      interest in all contested matters, adversary proceedings,
      and other motions and applications arising under, arising
      in, or related to this case;

   c. advise and consult concerning administration of the estate
      in this case, concerning the rights and remedies with
      regard to the Debtor's assets; concerning the claims of
      administrative, secured, priority, and unsecured creditors
      and other parties in interest;

   d. investigate the existence of other assets of the estate;
      and, if any exist, to take appropriate action to have the
      same turned over to the estate, including instituting
      lawsuits and investigating whether lawsuits exist; and

   e. prepare a Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization
      for the Debtor, and negotiate with all creditors and
      parties in interest who may be affected thereby; to obtain
      confirmation of a Plan, and perform all acts reasonably
      calculated to permit the Debtor to perform such acts and
      consummate a Plan.

Crowley Liberatore will be paid based upon its normal and usual
hourly billing rates.

Crowley Liberatore has been paid a total of $2,520 for prepetition
work performed for the Debtor relating to this case.  Philip Ison,
the principal of the Debtor, reimbursed the firm the $1,717 Chapter
11 filing fee in this case.  Crowley Liberatore continues to hold a
$7,480 retainer, paid by an entity affiliated with Philip Ison, to
use toward its postpetition court approved work.

Crowley Liberatore will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Karen M. Crowley, partner of Crowley Liberatore Ryan & Brogan,
P.C., assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person"
as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code
and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its
estates.

Crowley Liberatore can be reached at:

     Karen M. Crowley, Esq.
     CROWLEY LIBERATORE RYAN & BROGAN, P.C.
     150 Boush Street, Town Point Center, Suite 300
     Norfolk, VA 23510
     Tel: (757) 333-4500
     Fax: (757) 333-4501

                 About Bondariu Investments

Bondariu Investments, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 19-70065) on Jan. 8,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $1 million and liabilities of the same range.  The case
is assigned to Judge Frank J. Santoro.  Crowley, Liberatore, Ryan &
Brogan, P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.



CAPE MIAMI 32: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended Until April 23
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge A. Jay Cristol of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida extended the period for Cape Miami 32 LLC (DE)
to exclusively file a Chapter 11 plan to April 23, and to solicit
acceptances for the plan to June 23.

The extension would give the company more time to negotiate a
consensual plan with its creditors, according to court filings.  

                   About Cape Miami 32 LLC (DE)

Headquartered in Miami Beach, Florida, Cape Miami 32 LLC (DE) filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
18-17592) on June 25, 2018. In the Petition signed by Yonel Devico,
MGM, the Debtor estimated its assets at between $50,000 and
$100,000 and its liabilities at between $100,000 and $500,000.
Joel M. Aresty, Esq., at Joel M. Aresty P.A., serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  No official committee of unsecured
creditors has been appointed in the case.


CAPSTONE TURBINE: Management Discloses Substantial Doubt Exists
---------------------------------------------------------------
Capstone Turbine Corporation filed its quarterly report on Form
10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $3,450,000 on $18,030,000 of total
revenue for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net
loss of $323,000 on $22,761,000 of total revenue for the same
period in 2017.

At Dec. 31, 2018 the Company had total assets of $61,739,000, total
liabilities of $37,065,000, and $24,674,000 in total stockholders'
equity.

Chief Financial Officer & Chief Accounting Officer Jayme L. Brooks
states, "In connection with preparing the consolidated financial
statements for the third quarter of Fiscal 2019, management
evaluated whether there were conditions and events, considered in
the aggregate, that raised substantial doubt about our ability to
meet our obligations as they became due for the next twelve months
from the date of issuance of our third quarter of Fiscal 2019
interim condensed consolidated financial statements.  Management
assessed that there were such conditions and events, including a
history of recurring operating losses, negative cash flows from
operating activities, the continued negative impact by the
volatility of the global oil and gas markets, a strong U.S. dollar
in certain markets making our products more expensive in such
markets and ongoing global geopolitical tensions.

"We incurred a net loss of $3.5 million and used cash in operating
activities of $2,000 for the third quarter of Fiscal 2019.  Our
working capital requirements during the third quarter of Fiscal
2019 were in line with management's expectations, which included
cash received from TI of approximately $0.4 million and deployment
of approximately $2.6 million of our C1000 Signature Series systems
under our factory rental program.  The Company's net loss expanded
during the third quarter of Fiscal 2019 primarily because of lower
revenue and an increase in our warranty provision as a result of a
supplier defect identified during the first quarter of Fiscal 2019.
As of December 31, 2018, we had cash, cash equivalents and
restricted cash of $16.7 million, and outstanding borrowings under
our credit facility of $10.7 million."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/W0DBPA

Capstone Turbine Corporation develops, manufactures, markets, and
services microturbine technology solutions for use in stationary
distributed power generation applications worldwide. It offers
microturbine units, components, and various accessories for
applications, including cogeneration comprising combined heat and
power (CHP) and integrated CHP, as well as combined cooling, heat,
and power; and renewable energy, natural resources, and critical
power supply. Capstone Turbine Corporation was founded in 1988 and
is headquartered in Van Nuys, California.



CARE PRODUCTS: Seeks to Hire Smith Fankhauser as OCP
----------------------------------------------------
Care Products, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Texas to hire an accountant in the
ordinary course of its business.

The Debtor proposes to employ Smith Fankhauser Voigt & Watson,
PLLC, to provide accounting services related to the preparation and
filing of its annual IRS tax return.

The firm will be paid a flat fee of up to $4,000 for the
preparation of the Debtor's tax return for 2017 to 2018, and up to
$5,000 for the entire period in which its bankruptcy case is
active.

Smith Fankhauser does not have any interest adverse to the Debtor,
creditors or other "parties in interest," according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Roger Barker
     Smith Fankhauser Voigt & Watson, PLLC
     801 Quince Avenue
     McAllen, TX, 78501
     Phone: (956) 682-6365
     Fax: (956) 682-2995

                       About Care Products

Care Products, Inc., is a manufacturer of household and
institutional furniture and kitchen cabinet.  Its manufacturing
facilities are located on a 1.46 acre tract out of Lot 135, Pride
O'Texas Subdivision, City of McAllen, Hidalgo County, Texas.

Care Products, Inc., filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Case No. 19-70023) on Jan. 23, 2019.  In the petition signed by
Charles L. Graham, president, the Debtor disclosed $520,123 in
assets and $1,254,809 in liabilities.  Jana Smith Whitworth, Esq.,
at JS Whitworth Law Firm, PLLC, represents the Debtor.


CM RESORT: Trustee Seeks to Hire Cavazos Hendricks as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
John Dee Spicer, the Chapter 11 trustee for CM Resort, LLC, seeks
approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District
of Texas to hire his own firm as his legal counsel.

The trustee proposes to employ Cavazos Hendricks Poirot, P.C. to
assist him in the formulation of a bankruptcy plan; review claims
against CM Resort and its affiliates; assist in the employment of
bankruptcy professionals; and provide other legal services in
connection with the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.

The hourly rates range from $230 to $500 for the firm's attorneys
and from $50 to $135 for paraprofessionals.

Cavazos is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     John Dee Spicer, Esq.
     Cavazos Hendricks Poirot, P.C.
     Suite 570, Founders Square
     900 Jackson Street
     Dallas, TX 75202
     Phone: (214) 573-7300
     Fax: (214) 573-7399
     Email: jdspicer@chfirm.com

                        About CM Resort

Based in Gordon, Texas, CM Resort LLC, a single asset real estate,
filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case no. 18-43168) on Aug. 15,
2018.  In the petition signed by Mark Ruff, member and authorized
agent, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and
$10 million to $50 million in liabilities.  Judge Russell F. Nelms
presides over the case.  Gerrit M. Pronske, Esq. at Pronske Goolsby
& Kathman, P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.


CRS REPROCESSING: Argosy, et al., Suit vs TCC Moved to Kentucky Ct.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Edgardo Ramos granted Defendant Triangle Capital
Corporation's motion to transfer the case captioned ARGOSY CAPITAL
GROUP III, L.P.; SALEM HALIFAX CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.; CORDAM
GROUP, LLC; FRAN DONATO; and FRANK SEIDMAN, Plaintiffs, v. TRIANGLE
CAPITAL CORPORATION, Defendant, No. 17 Civ. 9845 (ER) (S.D.N.Y.) to
the U.S. District for the Western District of Kentucky.

The parties are all lenders on a note made by CRS Reprocessing,
LLC, a company headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky. In connection
with the note, Plaintiffs appointed Defendant Triangle Capital
Corporation as their "Collateral Agent," pursuant to which Triangle
was to perform any acts necessary to secure the collateral granted
to Plaintiffs by CRS.

After CRS filed for bankruptcy in 2017, Triangle proposed to loan
CRS money in exchange for a first-position lien in the collateral
secured by Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs and several other CRS creditors
objected repeatedly to this proposal. The bankruptcy court
nevertheless approved Triangle's proposal.

Plaintiffs subsequently sued Triangle, claiming that it knowingly
misrepresented CRS's financial status to them, breached its
contractual duties as Collateral Agent, and engaged in tortious
conduct to pursue its own financial interest at the expense of
Plaintiffs'. Triangle filed a motion to transfer the action to the
U.S. District for the Western District of Kentucky pursuant to 28
U.S.C.sections 1404(a) and 1412.

Plaintiffs argue that the Court's transfer analysis should start
and stop at the presence of the forum-selection clause found in the
Intercreditor Agreement. Triangle, on the contrary, argues that the
Intercreditor Agreement's forum-selection clause is inapplicable
because Plaintiffs' claims arise out of the Security Agreement
attached to their Complaint, not out of the Intercreditor
Agreement.

Assuming arguendo that the Intercreditor Agreement and its
attendant forum-selection clause applies to this action, the Court
concludes that the strong relationship between Plaintiffs' action
and core bankruptcy functions suffices to overcome the presumptive
enforceability of the forum-selection clause. Having spent almost a
year adjudicating the blitz of objections by Plaintiffs and other
creditors related to Triangle's financing to (and eventual
acquisition of) CRS, the Bankruptcy Court simply is in a better
position to adjudicate this action, as is the district in which
Bankruptcy Court sits. Understandably, it is for this reason why
courts presume that the appropriate venue to hear core proceedings
is, in fact, the district in which the underlying bankruptcy action
is pending. Indeed, "[i]t is not difficult to conclude that
enforcing the forum[-]selection clause here would not serve the
interests of justice. The palpable conflict between this action and
the [b]ankruptcy [cJase evokes a public interest sufficient to
outweigh the forum[-] selection clause." Given this conclusion, the
Court need not, and thus does not, decide whether the Intercreditor
Agreement and the forum-selection clause included is applicable
here.

In sum, Triangle has successfully met its burden to show that
transfer is appropriate here pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1412.

A copy of the Court's Order dated Jan. 9, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2IlvQXp from Leagle.com.

Argosy Capital Group III, L.P., Salem Halifax Capital Partners,
L.P., Cordam Group, LLC, Fran Donato & Frank Seidman, Plaintiffs,
represented by Edward Kang -- ekang@khflaw.com -- Kang Haggerty &
Fetbroyt LLC, Gregory Mathews -- gmathews@khflaw.com -- Kang
Haggerty & Fetbroyt LLC, pro hac vice, Kandis Lynn Kovalsky --
kkovalsky@khflaw.com -- Kang, Haggerty & Fetbroyt, LLC & Joshua H.
Epstein -- jepstein@dglaw.com -- Davis & Gilbert LLP.

Triangle Capital Corporation, Defendant, represented by Israel
Dahan -- idahan@kslaw.com -- King & Spalding LLP, Chelsea Jean
Corey , King and Spalding LLP & Thaddeus D. Wilson --
thadwilson@kslaw.com -- King & Spalding, LLP.

                   About CRS Reprocessing

CRS Reprocessing, LLC -- http://www.crs-reprocessing.com/-- is a
global partner in fluid reprocessing management, offering people,
technology and services to efficiently handle industrial fluids for
a variety of industries.  With 30 years of expertise and operations
in the U.S., Europe and Asia, its custom-built, on-site
reprocessing facilities economically transform used fluids back to
customer-specified performance levels, allowing high-yield waste
recovery and lower unit costs.

CRS Reprocessing, LLC, based in Louisville, KY, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 17-32565) on Aug. 9, 2017.  The
petition was signed by Scott T. Massie, chief executive.  In its
petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets
and $50 million to $100 million in liabilities.  Lea Pauley Goff,
Esq., and Emily Pagorski, Esq., at Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, serve
as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


DANIEL BENYAMIN: Ditech Financial's Proof of Claim Expunged
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn entered an order sustaining Debtors
Daniel Benyamin and Lucy Benyamin's objection and expunging proof
of Claim #5-1 filed by Ditech Financial LLC.

Ditech's involvement with this case began when it filed a proof of
claim, asserting that it was the creditor and the servicer of a
note secured by an investment property (the "Property") owned by
the Debtors.

After unsuccessfully trying for months to get Ditech to provide
Debtors' counsel with documents supporting its claim, on May 3,
2018, the Debtors' counsel filed an objection to Ditech's claim for
lack of standing. The deadline for a response to the Claim
Objection was June 12, 2018, but Ditech failed to file a timely
response and failed to appear at the noticed hearing on June 19,
2018. Ditech's counsel filed an untimely response to the Claim
Objection on June 26, 2018. On July 2, 2018, the Court issued a
Memorandum Opinion and Order Sustaining Debtors' Objection to Proof
of Claim # 5-1. That Opinion expunged Ditech's claim.

Following the expungement of its claim, Ditech filed a motion to
reconsider the order expunging the claim. Ditech argued that the
mortgage covering the Debtors' Property followed a chain of
assignments ending with Ditech. Perhaps most telling of all,
however, nowhere in the untimely Response filed by Robertson,
Anshutz & Schneid, P.L., or in the Motion for Reconsideration filed
by Ras Boriskin, did Ditech allege or offer proof that the note was
owned by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie
Mac").

Under Ditech's view of the case, Freddie Mac obtained the Note at
some unidentified time before the Petition Date. Freddie Mac then
entered into two agreements, also before the Petition Date. Under
the first agreement, Ditech agreed to act as servicer of the Note.
Under the second agreement, Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A. agreed to act as custodian of the Note for both Freddie Mac
and Ditech. Thus, according to Ditech, Ditech had standing to file
the Proof of Claim (1) because it was in constructive possession of
the Note on the Petition Date, through its custodial agent BNY
Mellon, and (2) because it was the servicer of the Note on the
Petition Date. Ditech failed to prove either theory at trial.
Accordingly, Ditech’s claim is expunged.

Ditech cannot show that it was the holder of the Note on the
Petition Date. To prove this point, Ditech attempted to introduce
into evidence a custodial agreement between Freddie Mac, Ditech,
and BNY Mellon. The Debtors objected, arguing that it was
inadmissible because the document was undated and unsigned.  The
Court sustained the objection. Without the custodial agreement,
Ditech failed to show that it was in actual or constructive
possession of the Note on the Petition Date. Even if the custodial
agreement had been admitted in evidence, the Court would still not
have sufficient evidence to find that Ditech was in constructive
possession of the Note as of the Petition Date because the
custodial agreement is not dated. Furthermore, the document does
not refer to the Note or to the Debtors. Thus, constructive
possession of the Note, through alleged custodian BNY Mellon,
cannot be the basis of Ditech's standing. Actual possession of the
note cannot be the basis of Ditech's standing either because Ditech
admitted that did not come into actual possession of the Note until
BNY Mellon transferred the Note to Ditech in the summer of 2018.

Ditech also argues that it has standing to file a Proof of Claim
because it was the servicer of the Note. This argument fails as
well. A purported servicer of a note must show that it is an
authorized agent of an entity that has the right to enforce the
note. Ditech introduced evidence showing that it is Freddie Mac's
agent, but it failed to show that Freddie Mac had the right to
enforce the Note. Ditech argued that Freddie Mac had standing to
enforce the Note because it had constructive possession of the Note
on the Petition Date due to its custodial relationship with BNY
Mellon. Ditech was unable to prove the custodial relationship
between Freddie Mac and BNY Mellon for the same reasons that Ditech
could not prove the custodial relationship between Ditech and BNY
Mellon: the custodial agreement was not admitted into evidence, it
was not dated, and it does not refer to the Note or the Debtors.
Thus, Ditech did not prove that Freddie Mac could have enforced the
Note and, accordingly, Ditech did not prove that it had standing as
the servicer of the Note.
For the foregoing reasons, Poof of Claim 5-1 is expunged.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated Feb. 13,
2019 is available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb17-12677-89.pdf

Attorneys for Debtors Daniel Benyamin and Lucy Benyamin:

    Randy M. Kornfeld, Esq.
    KORNFELD & ASSOCIATES, P.C
    240 Madison Avenue
    New York, New York 10016

Attorneys for Ditech Financial LLC:

    Brian P. Matthews, Esq.
    REED SMITH LLP
    599 Lexington Ave.
    New York, New York 10022
    bmatthews@reedsmith.com
    
Daniel Benyamin and Lucy Benyamin sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-12677) on Sept. 25, 2017.  The Debtors
tapped Randy M. Kornfeld, Esq., at Kornfeld & Associates, P.C., as
counsel.


DAYMARK PROPERTIES: March 15 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Raymond B. Ray is set to hold a hearing on March
15, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. to consider approval of Daymark Realty
Advisors, Inc. and affiliates disclosure statement.

The last day for filing and serving objections to the disclosure
statement is March 8, 2019.

    About Daymark Realty Advisors/Daymark Properties Realty

Based in Fort Laudersale, Florida, Daymark Realty Advisors Inc. is
a provider of strategic asset management and structured finance
services to private and institutional owners of commercial real
estate.

Daymark Realty and affiliates Daymark Properties Realty Inc. and
Daymark Residential Management Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Lead Case No. 18-23750) on November 4, 2018.  The
petition was signed by Espen Schiefloe, chief restructuring
officer.

In its petition, Daymark Realty estimated $207 in assets and
$22,223,304 in liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Edelboim Lieberman Revah Oshinsky PLLC, as
counsel and BMC Group, Inc., as claims, noticing and balloting
agent.


DESTINY PETROLEUM: Hires Phillips Murrah as Attorney
----------------------------------------------------
Destiny Petroleum LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Oklahoma to employ Phillips
Murrah P.C., as attorney to the Debtor.

Destiny Petroleum requires Phillips Murrah to:

   (a) render legal advice regarding the powers and duties of
       the Debtor that continue to operate their business as
       debtor in possession;

   (b) take all necessary action to protect and preserve the
       Debtor's estate, including the prosecution of actions on
       the Debtor's behalf, the defense of any actions commenced
       against the Debtor, the negotiation of disputes in which
       the Debtor is involved, and the preparation of objections
       to claims filed against the Debtor's estate;

   (c) prepare on behalf of the Debtor, as a debtor in
       possession, all necessary motions, applications, answers,
       orders, reports, and other papers in connection with the
       administration of the Debtor's estate and appear on the
       Debtor's behalf at all hearings regarding the Debtor's
       case;

   (d) negotiate, prepare, and file a plan of reorganization and
       related disclosure statements and all related documents,
       and otherwise promote the financial rehabilitation of the
       Debtor; and

   (e) perform all other necessary legal services in connection
       with the prosecution of the Chapter 11 case.

Phillips Murrah will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys             $360
     Paralegals            $120

Phillips Murrah currently holds a retainer of $1,095 to secure
payment of its post-petition fees and expenses.

Phillips Murrah will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Clayton D. Ketter, partner of Phillips Murrah P.C., assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Phillips Murrah can be reached at:

     Clayton D. Ketter, Esq.
     PHILLIPS MURRAH P.C.,
     101 North Robinson Avenue, 13th Floor
     Oklahoma City, OK 73102
     Tel: (405) 235-4100
     Fax: (405) 235-4133
     E-mail: cdketter@phillipsmurrah.com

                   About Destiny Petroleum

Destiny Petroleum -- https://destinypetro.com/ -- is an independent
oil and gas exploration and development company headquartered in
Edmond, Oklahoma, and operating in Mississippi Lime sweet spots
across Southern Kansas and Northern Oklahoma. Established and
founded in 2015, Destiny Petroleum was incorporated and began land
acquisition, technical subsurface studies and field development
activities in early 2016.

Destiny Petroleum LLC, based in Oklahoma City, OK, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Okla. Case No. 19-10412) on Feb. 6, 2019.
The Hon. Sarah A. Hall oversees the case.  Clayton D. Ketter, Esq.,
at Phillips Murrah P.C.,, serves as bankruptcy counsel to the
Debtor.  In the petition signed by CEO Emad Elrafie, the Debtor
estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.


DFH NETWORK: Seeks Court Approval of Proposed Plan Outline
----------------------------------------------------------
According to a notice, DFH Network, Inc., on March 19, 2019 at
10:30 am, will file a motion asking the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of California to approve its disclosure
statement.

The Debtor asserts that the information in the Disclosure Statement
is complete, accurate, and updated from the initial hearing on the
adequacy of the original Disclosure Statement. The Disclosure
statement describing the Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization was
filed on or about Feb. 8, 2019 and sets forth provisions including
the intended treatment of various classes of creditors, and the
proposed course of action regarding executory contracts and
unexpired leases, the means for execution and implementation of the
Debtor's Plan of Reorganization, the federal tax consequences of
plan confirmation, and plan voting and confirmation standards.

The Disclosure Statement also sets forth the Debtor's financial
problems and history and how they were addressed, distributions
contemplated, and cash flow projections for the Debtor's future
financial performance. The information in the Disclosure Statement
provides creditors entitled to vote on the Debtor's plan of
reorganization adequate information to make an informed judgment
regarding whether to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
Accordingly, the Debtor requests that the Court approve the
Disclosure Statement as containing adequate information, as the
term is defined in Bankruptcy Code Section 1125(a)(1).

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yygtv947 from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                   About DFH Network Inc.

DFH Network Inc. -- http://www.dfhnet.com/-- is a digital
broadcasting company that delivers Turkish channels to
Turkish-speaking houses in every region of America with its
subscription system.

DFH Network sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-13119) on August 23, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Suleyman Ozrifaioglu, vice-president of
Technology, the Debtor disclosed $57,000 in assets and $2,974,113
in liabilities.  

Judge Erithe A. Smith presides over the case.


DIABETIC SOLUTIONS: Seeks to Hire Mcnaughton as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Diabetic Solutions, LLC seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Indiana to hire Mcnaughton Law
Group, LLC as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties in the
operation of its business and management of its property, and will
provide other legal services in connection with its Chapter 11
case.

McNaughton will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                $195
     Associate Attorneys      $155
     Paralegals               $125

The firm will also receive reimbursement for work-related
expenses.

Foy McNaughton, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the case,
assured the court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Foy E. McNaughton, Esq.
     207 N Wayne Street
     Fremont, IN 46737
     Tel: (260) 527-1134
     Fax: (260) 527-1135
     E-mail: foy@debt-relief.in

                   About Diabetic Solutions LLC

Diabetic Solutions is a privately held company in Shipshewana,
Indiana that offers products such as diabetic testing supplies,
diabetic shoes, incontinence products, semi-electric hospital beds,
mobility products and bathroom assitive technology.

Diabetic Solutions filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ind.
Case No. 19-10131) on February 7, 2019. In the petition signed by
Jared Ballou, member, the Debtor estimated $280,021 in total assets
and $1,052,232 in total liabilities.

Foy E. McNaughton, Esq. at Mcnaughton Law Group, LLC, represents
the Debtor as counsel. The case has been assigned to Judge Robert
E. Grant.


DOUBLE JUMP: Seeks to Hire Clark Hill as Bankruptcy Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Double Jump, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Nevada to employ Clark Hill, PLC, as bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtors.

Double Jump requires Clark Hill to provide general bankruptcy and
restructuring services for the Debtors in the Chapter 11 Cases.

Clark Hill, in conjunction with Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom,
LLP, will communicate closely to ensure that the legal services
provided to the Debtors by each firm and the other professionals
retained by the Debtors are not unnecessarily duplicative and meet
the scope of services for which the Debtors seek their retention.

Skadden will be principally responsible for debtor in possession
financing, tax matters, including litigation with the United
States,, and negotiation and preparation of the chapter 11 plans
and disclosure statements.

Clark Hill will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys               $235 to $995
     Paralegals              $140 to $235

Clark Hill will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

As of the bankruptcy filing, the Debtor had retainer on hand of
$205,000 in Clark Hill's client trust account.

Candace C. Carlyon, partner of Clark Hill, PLC, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Clark Hill can be reached at:

     Candace C. Carlyon, Esq.
     Tracy M. O'Steen, Esq.
     CLARK HILL PLC
     3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 500
     Las Vegas, NV 89169
     Tel:  (702) 862-8300
     Fax:  (702) 862-8400
     E-mail: CCarlyon@ClarkHill.com
     E-mail: TOSteen@ClarkHill.com

                        About Double Jump

DC Solar Solutions, Inc., DC Solar Distribution, Inc., and DC Solar
Freedom, Inc., have become the largest manufacturer of mobile solar
generators over the last decade. DC Solar designs, manufactures,
and distributes mobile solar generators, mobile solar electric
vehicle chargers, mobile solar light towers, and mobile solar power
stations to private enterprises, municipalities, and universities.
DC Solar was founded in 2009, and today has deployed its units
across the United States.

Holding company Double Jump, Inc., holds 100% of the stock in DC
Solar Solutions and DC Solar Distribution.

On Dec. 18, 2018, the federal government seized funds from and
froze all bank accounts associated with the DC Solar companies,
allegedly in connection with a purported "investment fraud" by the
company.

On Jan. 30, 2019, Double Jump, and six limited liability companies
which primarily hold real estate -- Dog Blue Properties, LLC; Dora
Dog Properties LLC; Brandy Boy Properties, LLC; 475 Channel Road,
LLC; 140 Mason Circle LLC; and Park Road LLC -- sought Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 19-50102 to
19-50109).

On Feb. 3, 2019, DC Solar Solutions and DC Solar Distribution
commenced Chapter 11 cases (Case Nos. 19-50130 to 19-50131).

The petitions were signed by president and CEO Daniel S. Briggs.

The Debtors sought an order jointly administering the Chapter 11
cases for procedural purposes under the case of Double Jump, Inc.,
Case No. 19-50102.

DC Solar Solutions estimated $1 billion to $10 billion in assets
and $50 million to $100 million in liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Debtors tapped CLARK HILL PLLC as bankruptcy counsel; SKADDEN,
ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP as special counsel; and GLASSRATNER
ADVISORY & CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, as financial advisor.


EASTLAKE INVESTMENTS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Eastlake Investments LLC
        1109 Decker Road
        Walled Lake, MI 48390

Business Description: Eastlake Investments LLC is a Single Asset
                      Real Estate Debtor (as defined in 11 U.S.C.
                      Section 101(51B)), whose principal assets
                      are located at 35248 23 Mile Road New
                      Baltimore, MI 48047.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit)

Case No.: 19-42309

Judge: Hon. Thomas J. Tucker

Debtor's Counsel: Brett A. Border, Esq.
                  BORDER LAW PLLC
                  24725 W. 12 Mile Road, Suite 110
                  Southfield, MI 48034
                  Tel: 248-945-1111
                       833-325-7867
                  Fax: 248-945-4844
                  Email: bborder@savedme.com
                         bborder@bablawpllc.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $100,000 to $500,000

The petition was signed by Jimmy Danou, sole member.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb19-42309.pdf


EMMANUEL HEALTH: Hires Filis Law as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Health Home Care, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to employ The
Filis Law Firm, PC, as special litigation counsel to the Debtor.

Emmanuel Health requires Filis Law to represent the Debtor in the
case captioned as Seamster v. Emmanuel Health Homecare, Inc., Case
No. 2016-30113.

Filis Law will be paid at these hourly rates:

         Attorneys              $250
         Paralegals              $85

Filis Law will be paid a retainer in the amount of $500.

Filis Law will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Leona E. Filis, partner of The Filis Law Firm, PC, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Filis Law can be reached at:

         Leona E. Filis, Esq.
         THE FILIS LAW FIRM, PC
         5600 NW Central Drive, Suite 202
         Houston, TX 77092
         Tel: (713) 462-1777
         Fax: (713) 222-8323
         E-mail: leona@filislaw.com

                 About Emmanuel Health Home Care

Emmanuel Health Homecare, Inc., is a home health care services
provider in Houston, Texas. The company is a small business debtor
as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51D).

Emmanuel Health Homecare filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No.
18-32635) on May 21, 2018.  In the petition signed by Joyce Jones,
R.N., CEO, the Debtor disclosed $161,200 in total assets and $1.30
million in total liabilities.  Margaret Maxwell McClure, Esq., at
the Law Office of Margaret M. McClure, is the Debtor's counsel; and
In-Check Consulting, Payroll & Tax Service as its accountant. Filis
Law Firm, PC, is the special litigation counsel.



ESSA PHARMA: Current Working Capital Casts Going Concern Doubt
--------------------------------------------------------------
ESSA Pharma Inc. filed its Form 6-K, disclosing a net loss and
comprehensive loss of $2,710,767 on $0 of revenue for the three
months ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss and
comprehensive loss of $2,089,941 on $0 of revenue for the same
period in 2017.

At Dec. 31, 2018 the Company had total assets of $13,214,847, total
liabilities of $6,437,325, and $6,777,522 in total stockholders'
equity.

The Company has incurred losses and negative operating cash flows
since inception.  The Company incurred a net loss of $2,710,767
during the three months ended December 31, 2018 and has an
accumulated deficit of $47,079,853.  The ability of the Company to
continue as a going concern in the long-term depends upon its
ability to develop profitable operations and to continue to raise
adequate financing.  As at December 31, 2018, the Company has not
advanced its research into a commercially viable product.  The
Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon the
successful development of its NTD Technology to a commercial
standard.  Management has forecasted that the Company's current
working capital will not be sufficient to execute its planned
expenditures for the coming year.  These matters indicate the
existence of material uncertainties that raises substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

A copy of the Form 6-K with its attachments is available at:

                       https://is.gd/0KLyfd

ESSA Pharma Inc., a pharmaceutical company, focuses on the
development of small molecule drugs for the treatment of prostate
cancer.  The company was founded in 2009 and is headquartered in
Vancouver, Canada.


FIRSTENERGY SOLUTIONS: March 19 Disclosure Statement Hearing
------------------------------------------------------------
A hearing is scheduled before the Honorable Alan M. Koschik, United
States Bankruptcy Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, for
10:00 a.m. (prevailing Eastern Time) on March 19, 2019, to consider
the entry of an order approving, among other things, (i) the
Disclosure Statement explaining the joint Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization of FirstEnergy Solutions Corp., and its debtor
affiliates as containing "adequate information" pursuant to section
1125 of the Bankruptcy Code; (ii) procedures for soliciting,
receiving and tabulating votes on the Plan and for filing
objections to the Plan: (iii) the form of ballots, notices, and
certain other documents to be distributed in connection with the
solicitation of the Plan; (iv) the deadlines contained in the
solicitation and confirmation procedures: and (v) the procedures
for notice of the confirmation hearing and filing objections to
confirmation of the Plan.

The Plan resolves potential litigation surrounding the allocation
of value and consideration received under the FE Settlement
Agreement.  The creditors of each of the Debtors were keenly
focused on issues of allocation and distribution of the FE
Settlement Value. The Plan sets forth an agreed upon allocation of
the FE Settlement Value among certain of the Debtors' Estates based
on the Debtors' analysis of the various claims and causes of action
settled as part of the FE Settlement Agreement, among other
considerations.

The Plan resolves potential litigation surrounding the allowance
and treatment of Inter-Debtor Claims.  The Debtors have incurred
substantial pre- and postpetition Inter-Debtor Claims. The Plan
resolves potential litigation over the allowance and treatment of
the Inter-Debtor Claims by allowing the Inter-Debtor Claims at
agreed upon amounts (in certain instances reflecting a discount on
the asserted claims), and disallowing other Inter-Debtor Claims,
and, providing that Holders of the Inter-Debtor Claims will not
vote on the Plan, that prepetition Inter-Debtor Claims will receive
their Pro Rata share of Unsecured Distributable Value at the
applicable Debtor, and that the relative allocations of Unsecured
Distributable Value between the Debtors shall be fixed except with
respect to the ultimate recoveries on prepetition Inter-Debtor
Claims.

Class A3 - Unsecured Bondholder Claims Against FES with projected
allowed claim $2,237,912,062. Each Holder of an Allowed Unsecured
PCN/FES Notes Claim Against FES shall receive, on the Effective
Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, New FES
Common Stock, subject to dilution for the Management Incentive
Plan, in an amount equal to its Pro Rata share of FES Unsecured
Distributable Value.

Class A4 - Mansfield Certificate Claims Against FES are impaired
with projected allowed claim $786,763,400. Each Holder of an
Allowed Mansfield Certificate Claim Against FES shall receive, on
the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter,
New FES Common Stock, subject to dilution for the Management
Incentive Plan, in an amount equal to its Pro Rata share of FES
Unsecured Distributable Value.

Class A5 - FENOC-FES Unsecured Claims are impaired with projected
allowed claim  $138,631,609. Each Holder of an Allowed FENOC-FES
Unsecured Claim Against FES shall receive, on the Effective Date or
as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, cash equal to its Pro
Rata share of (i) the FES Unsecured Distributable Value and (ii)
the FENOC-FES Claim Reallocation, provided that such Holders shall
have the option to elect to receive their Pro Rata share of New FES
Common Stock in equal amount, subject to dilution for the
Management Incentive Plan.

Class A6 - FES Single Box Unsecured Claims are impaired with
projected allowed claim $568,559,650. Each Holder of an Allowed FES
Single-Box Unsecured Claim shall receive, on the Effective Date or
as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, cash equal to its Pro
Rata share of (i) the FES Unsecured Distributable Value, (ii) the
portion of the Reallocation Pool allocated to FES, (iii) the
FENOC-FES Claim Reallocation, and (iv) the NG Reallocation Pool.

Class A7 - Mansfield TIA Claims are impaired. Each Holder of an
Allowed Mansfield TIA Claim against FES shall receive, on the
Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter,
cash equal to its Pro Rata share of FES Unsecured Distributable
Value available to Holders of Allowed Mansfield TIA Claims against
FES.

Class A8 - Convenience Claims are impaired with projected allowed
claim $13,930,626. Each Holder of an Allowed Convenience Claim
against FES that has properly elected to be treated as such on its
Ballot shall receive, on the Effective Date or as soon as
reasonably practicable thereafter, Cash in an amount equal to 36.4%
of the Allowed Convenience Claim.

Class A9 - Inter-Debtor Claims are impaired with projected allowed
claim $3,189,409,689. Each Holder of an Allowed prepetition
Inter-Debtor Claim against FES shall receive their Pro Rata share
of the FE Unsecured Distributable Value.

Class A10 -  Interests in FES are impaired. As of the Effective
Date, Interests in FES shall be cancelled and released without any
distribution on account of such Interests.

Class B4 - Secured FG PCN Reinstated Claims are impaired with
projected allowed claim $156,782,117. Allowed Secured FG PCN
Reinstated Claims shall be Reinstated in full on the Effective Date
or as soon as practicable thereafter, provided, however, that any
Allowed Secured FG PCN Reinstated Claims relating to accrued and
unpaid pre- and postpetition interest on the principal amount of
Secured FG PCN Reinstated Claims shall be paid in full in Cash.

Class B5 - Unsecured PCN/FES Notes Claims Against FG are impaired
with projected allowed claim $2,237,912,062. Each Holder of an
Allowed Unsecured PCN/FES Notes Claim Against FG shall receive, on
the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter,
New FES Common Stock, subject to dilution for the Management
Incentive Plan, in an amount equal to its Pro Rata share of the FG
Unsecured Distributable Value.

Class B6 - Mansfield Certificate Claims Against FG are impaired
with projected allowed claim $786,763,400. Each Holder of an
Allowed Mansfield Certificate Claim Against FG shall receive, on
the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter,
New FES Common Stock, subject to dilution for the Management
Incentive Plan, in an amount equal to its Pro Rata share of the FG
Unsecured Distributable Value.

Class B7 - FG Single-Box Unsecured Claims are impaired with
projected allowed clam $338,341,660. Each Holder of an Allowed FG
Single-Box Unsecured Claim shall receive, on the Effective Date or
as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, cash equal to its Pro
Rata share of (i) the FG Unsecured Distributable Value and (ii) the
Reallocation Pool allocable to FG, provided that such Holders shall
have the option to elect to receive their ratable share of New FES
Common Stock in equal amount, subject to the Equity Election
Conditions and subject to dilution for the Management Incentive
Plan.

Class B8 - Mansfield TIA Claim are impaired. Each Holder of an
Allowed Mansfield TIA Claims against FG shall receive, on the
Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter,
cash equal to its Pro Rata share of FG Unsecured Distributable
Value.

Class B9 - Convenience Claims with projected allowed claim
$18,801,930. Each Holder of an Allowed Convenience Claim against FG
that has properly elected to be treated as such on its Ballot shall
receive, on the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable
thereafter, Cash in an amount equal to 22.0% of the Allowed
Convenience Claim.

Class B10 - Inter-Debtor Claims are impaired with projected allowed
claim $901,881,812. Each Holder of an Allowed prepetition
Inter-Debtor Claim against FG shall receive their Pro Rata share of
the FG Unsecured Distributable Value.

Class C3 - Secured NG PCN Claims are impaired with projected
allowed claim $307,173,955. Allowed Secured NG PCN Claims shall be
Reinstated in full on the Effective Date, or as soon thereafter as
practicable, provided, however, that any Allowed Secured NG PCN
Claims relating to accrued and unpaid pre- and postpetition
interest on the principal amount of the Secured NG PCN Claims
through and including the Effective Date shall be paid in full in
Cash.

Class C4 - Unsecured PCN/FES Notes Claims Against NG are impaired
with projected allowed claim $2,237,912,062. Each Holder of an
Allowed Unsecured PCN/FES Notes Claim Against NG shall receive, on
the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter,
New FES Common Stock, subject to dilution for the Management
Incentive Plan, in an amount equal to its Pro Rata share of NG
Unsecured Distributable Value.

Class C5 - Mansfield Certificate Claims Against NG are impaired
with projected allowed claim $786,763,400.  Each Holder of an
Allowed Mansfield Certificate Claim Against NG shall receive, on
the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter,
New FES Common Stock, subject to dilution for the Management
Incentive Plan, in an amount equal to its Pro Rata share of NG
Unsecured
Distributable Value.

Class C6 - NG Single- Box Unsecured Claims. Each Holder of an
Allowed NG Single-Box Unsecured Claim shall receive, on the
Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter,
cash equal to their Pro Rata share of NG Unsecured Distributable
Value.

Class C7 - NG-FENOC Unsecured Claims against NG are impaired with
projected allowed claim $82,611,834. Each Holder of an Allowed
NGFENOC Unsecured Claim against NG shall receive, on the Effective
Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, cash equal to
their Pro Rata share of NG Unsecured Distributable Value.

Class C8 - Convenience Claims are impaired.  Each Holder of an
Allowed Convenience Claim against NG that has properly elected to
be treated as such on its Ballot shall receive, on the Effective
Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, Cash in an
amount equal to 34.5% of the Allowed Convenience Claim.

Class C9 - Inter-Debtor Claims are impaired. Each Holder of an
Allowed prepetition Inter-Debtor Claim against NG, if any, shall
receive their Pro Rata share of the NG Unsecured Distributable
Value.

Class D3 - FES-FENOC Unsecured Claims against FENOC are impaired
with projected allowed claim $239,736,048. Each Holder of an
Allowed FENOC-FES Unsecured Claim against FENOC shall receive, on
the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter
cash equal to its Pro Rata share of FENOC Unsecured Distributable
Value.

Class D4 - FENOC Single-Box Unsecured Claims are impaired with
projected allowed claim $32,295,211. Each Holder of an Allowed
FENOC Single-Box Unsecured Claim shall receive, on the Effective
Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, cash equal to
its Pro Rata share of (i) the FENOC Unsecured Distributable Value
and (ii) the portion of the Reallocation Pool allocable to FENOC.

Class D5 - NG-FENOC Unsecured Claims against FENOC are impaired
with projected allowed claim $82,611,834. Each Holder of an Allowed
NGFENOC Unsecured Claim shall receive, on the Effective Date or as
soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, cash equal to its Pro
Rata share of FENOC Unsecured Distributable Value.

Class D6 - Convenience Claims are impaired with projected allowed
claim $15,766,808. Each Holder of an Allowed Convenience Claim
against FENOC that has properly elected to be treated as such on
its Ballot shall receive, on the Effective Date or as soon as
reasonably practicable thereafter, Cash in an amount equal to 24.0%
of the Allowed Convenience Claim.

Class D7 - Inter-Debtor Claims are impaired with projected allowed
claim $32, 603,216. Each Holder of an Allowed prepetition
Inter-Debtor Claim against FENOC shall receive their Pro Rata share
of the FENOC Unsecured Distributable Value.

Class D8 - Interests in FENOC are impaired. On the Effective Date,
Interests in FENOC shall be cancelled and released without any
distribution on account of such Interests. On the Effective Date,
shares of new common stock of Reorganized FENOC shall be issued to
Reorganized FES.

Class E3 - Mansfield Certificate Claims Against FGMUC are impaired
with projected allowed claim $786,763,400. Each Holder of an
Allowed Mansfield Certificate Claim against FGMUC shall receive, on
the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter,
New FES Common Stock subject to dilution for the Management
Incentive Plan, in an amount equal to its Pro Rata share of FGMUC
Unsecured Distributable Value.

Class E4 - FGMUC Single-Box Unsecured Claims are impaired with
projected allowed claim $14,545,718.  Holders of FGMUC Single-Box
Unsecured Claims shall receive, on the Effective Date or as soon as
reasonably practicable thereafter, cash equal to its Pro Rata share
of (i) the FGMUC Unsecured Distributable Value, and (ii) the
portion of the Reallocation Pool allocable to FGMUC.

Class E5 - Mansfield TIA Claims are impaired. The Holder of an
Allowed Mansfield TIA Claim against FGMUC shall receive, on the
Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter,
cash equal to the Pro Rata share of the FGMUC Unsecured
Distributable Value.

Class E6 - Convenience Claims are impaired with projected allowed
claim $613,151. Each Holder of an Allowed Convenience Claim against
FGMUC that has properly elected to be treated as such on its Ballot
shall receive, on the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably
practicable thereafter, Cash in an amount equal to 18.0% of the
Allowed Convenience Claim.

Class E7 - Inter-Debtor Claims are impaired with projected allowed
claim $367,534,565.  Each Holder of an Allowed prepetition
Inter-Debtor Claim against FGMUC shall receive their Pro Rata share
of the FGMUC Unsecured Distributable Value.

Class E8 - Interests in FGMUC are impaired and unimpaired. In the
discretion of the Debtors, in consultation with the Consenting
Creditors and the Committee, Reorganized FG shall continue to own
all of the Interests in FGMUC or FGMUC shall be dissolved and all
Interests in FGMUC shall be cancelled and released without any
distribution on account of such Interests.

Class F3 - General Unsecured Claims Against FE Aircraft are
impaired. Each Holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim Against
FE Aircraft shall receive, on the Effective Date or as soon as
reasonably practicable thereafter, its Pro Rata share of the FE
Aircraft Cash Distribution Pool.

Class F4 - Inter- Debtor Claims are impaired. Each Holder of an
Allowed prepetition Inter-Debtor Claim against FE Aircraft if any,
shall be treated pari passu with Unsecured Claims against FE
Aircraft and will share in distributions from FE Aircraft.

Class F5 - Interests in FE Aircraft are impaired. FE Aircraft shall
be dissolved and Interests in FE Aircraft shall be cancelled and
released without any distribution on account of such Interests.

Class G3 - General Unsecured Claims Against Norton are impaired.
Each Holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim Against Norton
shall receive, on the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably
practicable thereafter, its Pro Rata share of the Norton Cash
Distribution Pool.

Class G4 - Inter- Debtor Claims are impaired. Each Holder of an
Allowed prepetition Inter-Debtor Claim against Norton, if any,
shall be treated pari passu with Unsecured Claims against Norton
and will share in distributions from Norton.

Distributions under the Plan shall be funded with, as applicable:
(i) the New FES Common Stock, (ii) Cash on hand at the Debtors, and
(iii) the FE Settlement Value contributed to the Debtors under the
FE Settlement Agreement and the FE Settlement Order. Each
distribution and issuance referred to in Article VI of the Plan
shall be governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan
applicable to such distribution or issuance and by the terms and
conditions shall bind each Entity receiving such distribution or
issuance. The issuance of the New FES Common Stock in connection
with the Plan will be exempt from SEC registration to the fullest
extent permitted by law.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated February 11,
2019, is available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/ohnb19-1850757amk-2119.pdf

A full-text copy of the Valuation Analysis is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y3huc5ge from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

            About FirstEnergy Solutions Corp

Akron, Ohio-based FirstEnergy Solutions, Corp. (FES) is a
subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp (NYSE:FE). FES --
http://www.firstenergycorp.com/-- provides energy-related products
and services to retail and wholesale customers; and owns and
operates 5,381 MWs of fossil generating capacity through its
FirstEnergy Generation subsidiaries. FES also owns 4,048 MWs of
nuclear generating capacity through its FirstEnergy Nuclear
Generation subsidiary. Nuclear generating plants are operated by
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC), which is a separate
subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp.

On March 31, 2018, FirstEnergy Solutions and 6 affiliates,
including FENOC, each filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ohio
Lead Case No. 18-50757). The cases are pending before the Honorable
Judge Alan M. Koschik and the Debtors have requested that their
cases be jointly administered under Case No. 18-50757.

Parent company, First Energy Corp. and its other subsidiaries,
including its regulated subsidiaries, are not part of the filing
and will not be subject to the Chapter 11 process. First Energy
Corp. listed $42.2 billion in total assets against $4.07 billion in
total current liabilities, $21.1 billion in long-term debt and
other long-term obligations and $13.1 billion in non-current
liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2017.

The Debtors tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; Brouse McDowell LPA as co-counsel; Lazard Freres & Co. as
investment banker; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as
restructuring advisor and Charles Moore as chief restructuring
officer; and Prime Clerk as claims and noticing agent. The Debtors
also tapped Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP as special counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 9 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on April 12, 2018.  Milbank, Tweed, Hadley &
McCloy LLP and Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP serve as counsel to the
committee.


GAETANO ENTERPRISES: Seeks to Hire Barron & Newburger as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gaetano Enterprises, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Texas to hire Barron & Newburger,
PC, as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; review claims against the Debtor; assist in the
preparation and implementation of a plan of reorganization; and
provide other legal services in connection with its Chapter 11
case.

The hourly rates range from $275 to $495 for the firm's attorneys
and from $40 to $100 for the support staff.

Barbara Barron, Esq., and Stephen Sather, Esq., the principal
attorneys who will be handling the case, will each charge an hourly
fee of $495.  

Barron & Newburger received a retainer in the amount of $6,700.

Mr. Sather disclosed in a court filing that his firm is
"disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Stephen W. Sather, Esq.
     Barron & Newburger, P.C.
     7320 N. Mopac Expressway, Suite 400
     Austin TX 78731
     Phone: (512) 476-9103
     Email: ssather@bn-lawyers.com

                    About Gaetano Enterprises

Gaetano Enterprises, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 19-10115) on Jan. 28,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $500,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.  The case
is been assigned to Judge H. Christopher Mott.  Barron & Newburger,
P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.


GB SCIENCES: Incurs $4 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
--------------------------------------------------------
GB Sciences, Inc. has filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $4.05 million on $695,764 of sales revenue for the three months
ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $6.96 million on
$1.27 million of sales revenue for the same period in 2017.

For the nine months ended Dec. 31, 2018, the Company reported a net
loss of $19.43 million on $2.72 million of sales revenue compared
to a net loss of $13.26 million on $1.63 million of sales revenue
for the nine months ended Dec. 31, 2017.

As of Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had $30.63 million in total
assets, $11.26 million in total liabilities, and $19.37 million in
total stockholders' equity.

The Company recorded gross profit of approximately $0.4 million for
the three months ended Dec. 31, 2018, as compared to $0.9 million
for the same period in the prior year.  The decrease in gross
profit was caused by lower sales during the quarter ended Dec. 31,
2018.  The Company's Teco Cultivation Facility in Las Vegas, NV
sold 135 pounds of finished goods inventory in the quarter ended
Dec. 31, 2018 compared to 701 pounds during the quarter ended Dec.
31, 2017.

General and administrative expenses decreased $4.1 million to $3.0
million for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to $7.1
million for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2017.  The decrease is
attributable in part to a $1.0 million decrease in expense for
stock issued to consultants and a $2.0 million decrease in expense
for compensation warrants issued to the brokers in the Company's
private placements.  In addition, there was a $0.5 million decrease
in share-based compensation expense for options issued to
employees.

Total interest expense decreased by $0.8 million compared to the
same period in the prior year.  The decrease is primarily due to
$0.5 million of unamortized discount recognized as interest expense
upon the conversion of convertible notes in the prior year quarter
and decreased face interest and amortization of discount on
convertible notes outstanding due to the majority of convertible
notes already having been converted prior to the current quarter.

Total other expense was $0.4 million compared to $0.4 million of
other income in the same period prior year.  The increase is
primarily due to a $0.4 million gain on deconsolidation of GB
Sciences Puerto Rico, LLC recorded in the prior year quarter and
other expense recognized during the current year quarter related to
the Company's Amendment and Termination Agreement with Pacific Leaf
Ventures, LP.

The Company has incurred losses since inception resulting in an
accumulated deficit of approximately $79.8 million as of Dec. 31,
2018, and further losses are anticipated in the development of the
business raising substantial doubt about the ability to continue as
a going concern.  The ability to continue as a going concern is
dependent upon generating profitable operations in the future
and/or obtaining the necessary financing to meet obligations and
repay liabilities arising from normal business operations when they
come due.  Management intends to finance operating costs over the
next twelve months with existing cash on hand and/or private
placements of debt and equity securities.  The financials do not
include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and
reclassification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and
classifications of liabilities that might result from this
uncertainty.

                       Current Liquidity

The Company said it will need additional capital to implement its
strategies.  There is no assurance that it will be able to raise
the amount of capital needed for future growth plans.  Even if
financing is available, it may not be on terms that are acceptable.


"If unable to raise the necessary capital at the times required,
the Company may have to materially change the business plan,
including delaying implementation of aspects of the business plan
or curtailing or abandoning the business plan.  The Company
represents a speculative investment and investors may lose all of
their investment.  In order to be able to achieve the strategic
goals, the Company needs to further expand its business and
financing activities.  Based upon the cash position, it is
necessary to raise additional capital by the end of the next
quarter in order to continue to fund current operations.  These
factors raise substantial doubt about the ability to continue as a
going concern.  The Company is pursuing several alternatives to
address this situation, including the raising of additional funding
through equity or debt financings.  In order to finance existing
operations and pay current liabilities over the next twelve months,
the Company will need to raise additional capital. No assurance can
be given that the Company will be able to operate profitably on a
consistent basis, or at all, in the future.  The principal sources
of liquidity to date have been cash generated from sales of debt
and equity securities and loans," the Company stated in the SEC
filing.

At Dec. 31, 2018, cash was $0.3 million, other current assets
excluding cash were $4.3 million, and the Company's working capital
was $(0.4) million.  At the same time, current liabilities were
approximately $5.0 million and consisted principally of $2.3
million in accounts payable, $0.5 million in accrued liabilities,
$1.5 million in notes payable, net of $0.7 million in discounts,
and $0.7 million in income tax payable.  At March 31, 2018, the
Company had a cash balance of $3.6 million, other current assets
excluding cash were $3.7 million and the Company's working capital
was $5.3 million. Current liabilities were approximately $1.9
million, which consisted principally of and $0.4 million in
accounts payable, $0.5 million in accrued liabilities, and $1.1
million in notes payable, net of $5.0 million in discounts.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                        https://is.gd/on1qg6

                         About GB Sciences

Las Vegas, Nevada-based GB Sciences, Inc., formerly Growblox
Sciences, Inc., is developing and utilizing state of the art
technologies in plant biology, cultivation and extraction
techniques, combined with biotechnology, and plans to produce
consistent and measurable medical-grade cannabis, cannabis
concentrates and cannabinoid therapies.  The Company seeks to be an
innovative technology and solution company that converts the
cannabis plant into medicines, therapies and treatments for a
variety of ailments.

GB Sciences reported a net loss of $23.16 million for the 12 months
ended March 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $10.08 million for
the 12 months ended March 31, 2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2018, the
Company had $30.40 million in total assets, $8.39 million in total
liabilities, and $22 million in total equity.

Soles, Heyn & Company, LLP's audit opinion included in the
company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31,
2018 contains a going concern explanatory paragraph stating that
the Company had accumulated losses of approximately $58,230,000,
has generated limited revenue, and may experience losses in the
near term.  These factors and the need for additional financing in
order for the Company to meet its business plan, raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


GENERAL STEEL: Accumulated Deficit Casts Going Concern Doubt
------------------------------------------------------------
General Steel Holdings, Inc. filed its quarterly report on Form
10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $760,393 on $0 of revenue for the
three months ended Sep. 30, 2018, compared to a net loss of
$840,933 on $0 of revenue for the same period in 2017.

At Sep. 30, 2018 the Company had total assets of $16,094,212, total
liabilities of $9,403,689, and $6,690,523 in total stockholders'
equity.

Chief Executive Officer Zuosheng Yu and Chief Financial Officer
John Chen state, "The Company had working capital deficit of $9.4
million at September 30, 2018 and working capital deficit $10.6
million at December 31, 2017.  In addition, the Company had an
accumulated deficit of $1.3 billion at September 30, 2018 and
incurred negative cash flows from operating activities totaling
$(1.7) million as of September 30, 2018.  These factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.  The Company's ability to continue as a going
concern is dependent on its ability to obtain financial support and
credit guarantee from the Company's shareholders or other available
resources from the PRC banks and other financial institutions given
the Company's credit history.  The Company's consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of reported asset amounts or the
amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary
should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/ByPKvL

General Steel Holdings, Inc., headquartered in Beijing, China,
produces a variety of steel products including rebar, high-speed
wire and spiral-weld pipe.  General Steel --
http://www.gshi-steel.com/-- has operations in China's Shaanxi and
Guangdong provinces, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and Tianjin
municipality with seven million metric tons of crude steel
production capacity under management.



GIGA WATT: Trustee Hires Lauren Miehe as Consultant
---------------------------------------------------
Mark D. Waldron, the Chapter 11 Trustee of Giga Watt, Inc., seeks
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District
of Washington to employ Lauren Miehe, as consultant to the
Trustee.

The Trustee requires Lauren Miehe to assist the Debtor in reviewing
infrastructure, calculating utility use, review relevant
financials, and extrapolate the Debtor's revenue capability.

Lauren Miehe will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates.

Lauren Miehe, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estates.

Lauren Miehe can be reached at:

     Lauren Miehe
     630 Valley Mall Parkway, Suite 122
     East Wenatchee, WA 98802
     Tel: (206) 681-0809

                        About Giga Watt

Giga Watt Inc., a cryptocurrency mining services provider based in
East Wenatchee, Washington, filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
E.D. Wash. Case No. 18-03197) on Nov. 19, 2018.  In the petition
signed by Andrey Kuzenny, secretary, the Debtor estimated up to
$50,000 in assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Frederick P. Corbit.

Winston & Cashatt, Lawyers, led by shareholder Timothy R. Fischer,
is the Debtor's counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Dec. 19, 2018.  The committee tapped DBS Law
as its legal counsel.



GIGCAPITAL INC: Expected Ongoing Costs Cast Going Concern Doubt
---------------------------------------------------------------
GigCapital, Inc., filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $164,103 on $0 of revenue for the three
months ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $145,928 on
$0 of revenue for the period from October 9, 2017 (Date of
Inception) through December 31,2017.

At Dec. 31, 2018 the Company had total assets of $146,131,923,
total liabilities of $1,455,910, and $5,000,001 in total
stockholders' equity.

GigCapital states, "As of December 31, 2018, the Company had
$324,300 in cash and a working capital deficit of $1,034,524.
Further, the Company expects to continue to incur significant costs
in pursuit of its financing and acquisition plans.  These
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.  The Company plans to address this
uncertainty by raising additional capital.  There is no assurance
that the Company's plans to raise capital or to consummate a
Business Combination will be successful or successful within the
target business acquisition period.  The financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/ZhCsSq

GigCapital, Inc. intends to effect a merger, share exchange, asset
acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization, recapitalization, or
other similar business combination with one or more businesses.
The Company was founded in 2017 and is based in Palo Alto,
California.



GRATE ENTERPRISES: $1.2M Sale of Morgantown Denny's Resto Approved
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Patrick M. Flatley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of West Virginia authorized Grate Enterprises,
Inc.'s sale of interest in the improved real property known as
Grate Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Denny's Restaurant, 258
Retail Circle, Morgantown, Monongalia County, West Virginia, to S &
T Restaurants, Inc., for $1.2 million.

On Feb. 8, 2019, the Court held a telephonic hearing on the
Motion.

Upon the closing of the sale of the Property, the settlement agent
conducting closing is authorized and directed to disburse from and
distribute the sale proceeds as follows:  

      a. First, to the payment of the costs of sale, including that
commission and reimbursement of compensable expenses payable to A&G
in such sum as expressly is agreed between A&G and First United
Bank and Trust, the holder of the first priority lien on the
Property;  

      b. Second, to the payment of the usual and customary costs of
closing;

      c. Third, to the extent funds are available, to First United
in payment in full of its first priority secured lien on the
Property;

      d. Fourth, to the extent funds are available, to the holders
of the other secured liens on the Property in the order of their
respective priority; and

      e. Fifth, to the extent funds are available, to the payment
of the holders of administrative and unsecured claims.

The Court also grants the deferment of the filing fee until such
time as funds are available to pay said fee.

The Debtor will file a report with the Court after the conclusion
of the auction or sale procedures.

Upon payment of the purchase price by the Buyer and closing upon
the sale of the Property as above authorized, and distribution of
the sale proceeds as outlined, the Buyer will receive title to the
Property free and clear of all Encumbrances of the Debtor's
creditors or interested parties, including, without limitation, any
state sales tax claims or liens.

                     About Grate Enterprises

Grate Enterprises, Inc., is a franchisee of the Denny's Restaurant.
It owns in fee simple a building currently operated as Denny's
Restaurant and 1.194 acres SUR or Lot 3 Evansville Pike, First Ward
District in Monongalia County, West Virginia.  The property has an
appraisal value of $2.5 million.

Grate Enterprises sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. W.Va. Case No. 18-01069) on Nov. 22,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $2,856,754
in assets and $1,995,792 in liabilities.  The Hon. Patrick M.
Flatley is the case judge.  The Debtor tapped Gianola, Barnum,
Bechtel & Jecklin, LC as its legal counsel.

On Dec.19, 2018, the Court appointed Michael Matlat with A&G Realty
Partners, LLC, to act as a real estate consultant and advisor.



GREENE AVENUE: Rightful Owner of Disputed Property, Court Rules
---------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiff, Greene Avenue Restoration Corp. II, commenced an
adversary proceeding seeking a determination that it is the owner
of 689 Greene Avenue, Brooklyn, New York (the "Property"), and that
defendants Green Throop LLC, Avi Rosengarten, Esq., Myopic, LLC,
and Susan Green have no interest in the Property. Susan Green, the
prior owner of the Property, executed a deed, dated Dec. 3, 2014
(the "2014 Deed"), transferring the Property to Plaintiff’s
predecessor in interest, Greene Avenue Restoration Corp. (the
"Purchaser"), an entity also owned by Plaintiff's principal, Adler
Milord. In October 2017, Susan Green entered into a contract to
sell the Property to defendant Myopic, LLC.

Bankruptcy Judge Carla E. Craig finds that Plaintiff is the owner
of the Property, and defendants, Susan Green and Myopic, do not
have any rights or interests in the Property.

Susan Green offers several reasons why the Court should find that
she owns the Property, and has the right to sell it to Myopic,
notwithstanding her prior transfer of the Property to the
Purchaser. She contends (i) that the 2014 Deed is void ab initio
because she lacked authority to transfer the Property; (ii) that
the 2014 Deed should be rescinded because it was executed as a
result of fraud in the inducement; and (iii) that, because of a
violation of New York Real Property Law section 265-a (the Home
Equity Theft Prevention Act ("HETPA")) in connection with her
transfer of the Property to Purchaser, the Court should either
rescind the 2014 Deed, grant equitable relief, such as designating
Plaintiff and Susan Green co-owners in the Property, or award her
monetary damages. Alternatively, Susan Green seeks dismissal of
Plaintiff’s bankruptcy case.

A trial was held on Oct. 4, 2018, where the Court heard testimony
from Plaintiff’s principal, Adler Milord, Susan Green, and Wayman
G. Wynn. Following trial, the parties submitted additional briefing
on the applicability of HETPA, and argument on that issue was heard
on Nov. 14, 2018 and Nov. 27, 2018.

The Court holds that Plaintiff is entitled to declaratory judgment
that it is the owner of the Property and that the defendants do not
have any rights or interest in the Property. The evidence shows
that the transfer of the Property pursuant to the 2014 Deed was
neither void nor the result of fraud in the inducement, and that
HETPA is inapplicable because the Property was not Susan Green's
primary residence at the time of, or immediately prior to, the
transfer of the Property to the Purchaser.

A copy of the Court's Decision dated Feb. 11, 2019 is available
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb1-17-45394-78.pdf

Attorney for Plaintiff:

     Avrum Rosen, Esq.
     Rosen, Kantrow & Dillon, PLLC
     38 New Street
     Huntington, New York 11743

Attorney for Defendants: Myopic LLC and Susan Green:

     Charles L. Mester, Esq.
     Wenig Saltiel, LLP
     26 Court Street, Suite 1200
     Brooklyn, New York 11242
     cmester@ltattorneys.com

            About Greene Avenue Restoration Corp.

Greene Avenue Restoration Corp. sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-45394) on Oct.
19, 2017.  Judge Carla E. Craig presides over the case.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of
less than $1 million.  The Debtor hired Rosen, Kantrow & Dillon,
PLLC as its legal counsel.


GULFSTREAM DIAGNOSTICS: Hires Munsch Hardt as Bankruptcy Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gulfstream Diagnostics, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas to employ
Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C., as general bankruptcy counsel to
the Debtor.

Gulfstream Diagnostics requires Munsch Hardt to:

   a. serve as attorneys of record for the Debtor in all aspects,
      including any adversary proceedings commenced in connection
      with the Bankruptcy Case and to provide representation and
      legal advice to the Debtor throughout the Bankruptcy Case;

   b. assist the Debtor in carrying out its duties under the
      Bankruptcy Code, including advising the Debtor of such
      duties, its obligations, and its legal rights;

   c. consult with the U.S. Trustee, any statutory committee that
      may be formed, and all other creditors and parties-in-
      interest concerning administration of the Bankruptcy Case;

   d. assist in potential sales of the Debtor's assets;

   e. prepare on behalf of the Debtor all motions, applications,
      answers, orders, reports, and other legal papers and
      documents to further the Estate's interests and objectives,
      and to assist the Debtor in the preparation of schedules,
      statements, and reports, and to represent the Debtor and
      the Estate at all related hearings and at all related
      meetings of creditors, U.S. Trustee interviews, and the
      like;

   f. to assist the Debtor in connection with formulating and
      confirming a Chapter 11 plan;

   g. assist the Debtor in analyzing and appropriately treating
      the claims of creditors;

   h. appear before this Court and any appellate courts or other
      courts having jurisdiction over any matter associated with
      the Bankruptcy Case; and

   i. perform all other legal services and provide all other
      legal advice to the Debtor as may be required or deemed to
      be in the interests of the Estate in accordance with the
      Debtor's powers and duties as set forth in the Bankruptcy
      Code.

Munsch Hardt will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                   $500-$700
     Paralegals                  $170

On January 15, 2019, the Debtor provided Munsch Hardt with a
retainer in the amount of $30,000. On January 16, 2019, Munsch
Hardt drew on the retainer in the amount of $8,733, leaving a
balance held in retainer by Munsch Hardt as of the Petition Date of
$21,267, which Munsch Hardt shall continue to hold in a trust
account and not apply except as authorized by the Court.

Munsch Hardt will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Davor Rukavina, partner of Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C., assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Munsch Hardt can be reached at:

     Davor Rukavina, Esq.
     Thomas Berghman, Esq.
     Thomas D. Berghman, Esq.
     Fareed Kaisani, Esq.
     MUNSCH HARDT KOPF & HARR, P.C.
     3800 Ross Tower, 500 N. Akard Street
     Dallas, TX 75201
     Tel: (214) 855-7500
     Fax: (214) 855-7584

                  About Gulfstream Diagnostics

Gulfstream Diagnostics, LLC, operates a medical laboratory in
Dallas, Texas. It provides clinical, pharmacogenetics and
toxicology laboratory tests. Its laboratory features Beckman
Coulter, Agilent Technologies, Douglas Scientific, and Tecan
instrumentation.

Gulfstream Diagnostics filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-30159) on Jan. 16, 2019.  In the
petition signed by Maison Vasek, chief financial officer, the
Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Judge Stacey G. Jernigan oversees the case.  Thomas
Daniel Berghman, Esq. at Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C., is the
Debtor's counsel.



H N HINCKLEY: $3K Private Sale of 1995 Chevy Kodiak Dump Truck OK'd
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Joan N. Feeney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Massachusetts authorized H N Hinckley & Sons, Inc.'s private
sale of a 1995 Chevy Kodiak Dump Truck to Bill Manley for $3,000,
cash.

The hearing on the Motion set for Feb. 20, 2019 at 11:30 a.m. was
cancelled.

                      About H N Hinckley & Sons

H N Hinckley & Sons, Inc., headquartered in Vineyard Haven,
Massachusetts, is a dealer of building material and supplies.  H N
Hinckley & Sons filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Mass. Case
No. 18-10398) on Feb. 6, 2018.  In the petition signed by Wayne M.
Guyther III, president, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities
at $1 million to $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Joan
N. Feeney.  The Debtor tapped Posternak Blankstein & Lund LLP as
its legal counsel and Schlossberg LLC as the special counsel.


H N HINCKLEY: $6K Private Sale of 2001 Great Dane Box Trailer OK'd
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Joan N. Feeney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Massachusetts authorized H N Hinckley & Sons, Inc.'s private
sale of a 2001 Great Dane Box Trailer to Greg Carroll for $6,000,
cash.

The hearing on the Motion set for Feb. 20, 2019 at 11:30 a.m. was
cancelled.

                      About H N Hinckley & Sons

H N Hinckley & Sons, Inc., headquartered in Vineyard Haven,
Massachusetts, is a dealer of building material and supplies.  H N
Hinckley & Sons filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Mass. Case
No. 18-10398) on Feb. 6, 2018.  In the petition signed by Wayne M.
Guyther III, president, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities
at $1 million to $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Joan
N. Feeney.  The Debtor tapped Posternak Blankstein & Lund LLP as
its legal counsel and Schlossberg LLC as the special counsel.


H N HINCKLEY: $7K Private Sale of 1991 Chevy Kodiak Boom Truck OK'd
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Joan N. Feeney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Massachusetts authorized H N Hinckley & Sons, Inc.'s private
sale of a 1991 Chevy Kodiak Boom Truck to Sky Snedecker for $7,000,
cash.

The hearing on the Motion set for Feb. 20, 2019 at 11:30 a.m. was
cancelled.

                      About H N Hinckley & Sons

H N Hinckley & Sons, Inc., headquartered in Vineyard Haven,
Massachusetts, is a dealer of building material and supplies.  H N
Hinckley & Sons filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Mass. Case
No. 18-10398) on Feb. 6, 2018.  In the petition signed by Wayne M.
Guyther III, president, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities
at $1 million to $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Joan
N. Feeney.  The Debtor tapped Posternak Blankstein & Lund LLP as
its legal counsel and Schlossberg LLC as the special counsel.


H N HINCKLEY: $8K Private Sale of 1998 Freightliner Tractor Okayed
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Joan N. Feeney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Massachusetts authorized H N Hinckley & Sons, Inc.'s private
sale of a 1998 Freightliner Tractor to Carroll's Martha's Vineyard
Rapid Transit, Inc. for $8,000, cash.

The hearing on the Motion set for Feb. 20, 2019 at 11:30 a.m. was
cancelled.

                      About H N Hinckley & Sons

H N Hinckley & Sons, Inc., headquartered in Vineyard Haven,
Massachusetts, is a dealer of building material and supplies.  H N
Hinckley & Sons filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Mass. Case
No. 18-10398) on Feb. 6, 2018.  In the petition signed by Wayne M.
Guyther III, president, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities
at $1 million to $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Joan
N. Feeney.  The Debtor tapped Posternak Blankstein & Lund LLP as
its legal counsel and Schlossberg LLC as the special counsel.



HENDRIX SCHENCK: March 12 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
---------------------------------------------------------
The hearing on the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement explaining
Hendrix Schenck Inc.'s Chapter 11 Plan will be held before the
Honorable John K. Sherwood on March 12, 2019 at 10:00 AM.

Written objections to the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement
shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court and served upon counsel
for the Debtor, Counsel for the Creditor’s Committee and upon the
United States Trustee no later than 14 days prior to the hearing
before this Court.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yyzqebl6 from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                   About Hendrix Schenck

Hendrix Schenck Inc. is a privately-held company in the investment
pools and funds industry.  It owns four properties in New York and
New Jersey, with a total value of $990,000.

Hendrix Schenck sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. N.J. Case No. 18-30765) on October 18,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of less than $1 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  

The case has been assigned to Judge John K. Sherwood.


HL ACQUISITION: More Capital Requirements Cast Going Concern Doubt
------------------------------------------------------------------
HL Acquisition Corp. filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net income of $215,576 on $0 of total revenue for the
three months ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net income of
$376,689 on $0 of total revenue for the same period in 2017.

At Dec. 31, 2018 the Company had total assets of $55,899,312, total
liabilities of $6,955, and $5,000,001 in total stockholders'
equity.

HL Acquisition states, "The Company will need to raise additional
capital through loans or additional investments from its Sponsor,
an affiliate of the Sponsor, or its officers or directors.  The
Company's officers, directors and Sponsor, or their affiliates,
may, but are not obligated to, loan the Company funds, from time to
time or at any time, in whatever amount they deem reasonable in
their sole discretion, to meet the Company's working capital needs.
Accordingly, the Company may not be able to obtain additional
financing.  If the Company is unable to raise additional capital,
it may be required to take additional measures to conserve
liquidity, which could include, but not necessarily be limited to,
curtailing operations, suspending the pursuit of a potential
transaction, and reducing overhead expenses.  The Company cannot
provide any assurance that new financing will be available to it on
commercially acceptable terms, if at all.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern through January 2, 2020, which is the date the
Company is required cease all operations except for the purpose of
winding up if it has not completed a Business Combination.  These
condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments
relating to the recovery of the recorded assets or the
classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should
the Company be unable to continue as a going concern."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/XxGFpl

HL Acquisition Corp. does not have significant operations.  It
intends to acquire, engage in a share exchange, share
reconstruction and amalgamation with, purchase all or substantially
all of the assets of, enter into contractual arrangements with, or
engage in any other similar business combination with one or more
businesses or entities.  The Company was founded in 2018 and is
based in New York, New York.




HOOK LINE: R. Jurasek Objects to Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------
Robert Jurasek, minority owner of Debtor and proponent of the
Amended Jurasek Plan, objects to the Supplemental Disclosure
Statement filed by Hook Line & Sinker, Inc.

According to Jurasek, the Debtor's Supplemental Disclosure
Statement, which supports the Debtor's Fourth Amended Plan, does
not disclose the fact that the Debtor's Amended Plan does not
include a forbearance agreement from Salamatof Native Association,
Inc., the largest creditor of the estate that is owed $1.9 million.


Jurasek points out that the Debtor again claims that under the
Amended Jursaek Plan, "the two majority owners, James Maurer and
Billy Opinsky, would be forced to give up their ownership interests
and would be paid nothing in exchange."  Jurasek asserts that it is
not accurate, Maurer and Opinsky will be receiving an immediate
benefit of a $1,030,000 debt reduction for debts they have
guaranteed ($900,000 reduction in Salamatof debt and $130,000
reduction in Brady/Szymanski debt).

Jurasek further asserts that the Debtor claims that "[n]early all
the creditors who sent in a ballot voted to accept [Debtor's Second
Amended Plan]," while "voting was more evenly divided" on the
Jurasek Plan. Jurasek points out this is a highly misleading claim
given how the voting actually occurred. Jurasek further points out
that though most of the creditors who voted for the Debtor's Second
Amended Plan did vote in favor, the Debtor only received 6 "yes"
votes in Class 1, 12 "yes" votes in Class 2, and zero votes in the
remaining creditor class.

Counsel for Robert Jurasek:

     Michael R. Mills, Esq.
     Shane K. Kanady, Esq.
     DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
     1031 W. 4th Avenue, Suite 600
     Anchorage, AK 99501-5907
     Phone: (907) 276-4557
     Fax: (907) 276-4152
     Email: mills.mike@dorsey.com
            kanady.shane@dorsey.com

              About Hook Line & Sinker Inc.

Hook Line & Sinker, Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Alaska Case No. 17-00415).  Judge Gary
Spraker presides over the case.  David H. Bundy, Esq., is the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


HOOK LINE: Unsecureds to be Paid $150K at 5% in New Jurasek Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Jurasek filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Alaska a supplemental disclosure statement, which
provides further disclosure information to all parties regarding
the Amended Jurasek Plan.

The amended key plan terms include the following:

Class 1 general unsecured claims will be paid $150,000 on the
Effective Date, $130,000 from new value paid by Jurasek and $20,000
from Reorganized Debtor's cash on hand. Class 1 will also now
receive 5% interest from the Effective Date.

The Amended Jurasek Plan creates Class 1B, which includes the
subordinated claim of Patrick Flynn (if allowed by the Court) and
the equity owner subrogated IRS debt. This subrogated claim is
based upon approximately $110,000 in tax refunds that were kept by
the IRS and applied to the priority debt of the IRS (approximately
$19,000 for Maurer, $37,075 for Jurasek, and $53,500 for
Buchholdt). Class 1B claims shall be paid monthly (42 months with
5% interest) pro rata after the Class 1 creditors (are paid in
full). These individuals can subrogate to the IRS claim so that
they can be reimbursed but don't receive the priority status.

Class 3 insider debt will now be paid in full, with 6% interest,
rather than any amounts forgiven after Class 4 is paid. This means
that BIA/Kohola should receive approximately $150,000 after Class 4
assignment creditors are paid. Class 3 will be paid $350,100 on
Dec. 31, 2020, $227,296 on June 30, 2021, $100,000 on Dec. 31,
2021, and $88,315 on June 30, 2022, split pro rata among the Class
3 claimants.

Jurasek's new value contribution, which is now set at $420,000 due
to the smaller equity position being obtained by Jurasek (50%
instead of 70%), shall come from a loan from a group of investors
made up of the following individuals: David and Jean Sawatzky,
William Strockbine, and Pete Burns (the same investors listed in
the original Disclosure Statement, other than one unnamed person
who is no longer involved). Jurasek will initially own 50% of the
Reorganized Debtor, however, the investor group has the right to
convert its debt to equity after June 31, 2019, such that, if
exercised, Jurasek will own 7.5% of Reorganized Debtor and the
investor group shall own 42.5%. If not exercised, Jurasek will need
to repay the loan. As with any other corporate form, majority
approval is required for most items meaning that there is no
"controlling interest" in Reorganized Debtor. However, Salamatof
Native Association, Inc. will have financial oversight of the
Reorganized Debtor.

Key additional disclosures include the following:

First, post-confirmation oversight of the Reorganized Debtor will
be such that Salamatof and Jurasek will initially have 50%
ownership respectively, and will need to unanimously agree on most
required decisions. If some or all of Jurasek's debt used to invest
the new value is converted to equity, the Reorganized Debtor will
be managed by a board of directors. The board seats will roughly be
allocated to reflect the ownership rights of the owners. The board
will not have day-to-day responsibilities for the Reorganized
Debtor, but will have normal board duties of overseeing the
strategic direction of the Reorganized Debtor and overseeing the
General Manager, Pete Burns.

However, Salamatof will have financial oversight in that it will
retain final decision-making authority on annual budgets (with
input from all parties). If the budget is exceeded or changed, then
51% vote of equity will be required to approve the changes.
Salamatof shall also have sole authority to hire, fire, and
exercise long-term management of the Reorganized Debtor's
bookkeeper and accountant. Termination of the General Manager can
only occur if he/she is not meeting financial goals stated in the
annual budgets, and after a 51% vote of equity owners. The
exclusive right to approve annual budgets and hiring/firing
bookkeeper and accountant will terminate when the Salamatof debt is
paid in full (it then becomes a board decision). Other that those
rights, Salamatof will function as a 50% owner with standard
rights.

A copy of Jurasek's Supplemental Disclosure Statement is available
at https://is.gd/x02QDH from Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

A copy of Jurasek's First Amended Plan is available at
https://is.gd/iKDqsE from Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

              About Hook Line & Sinker Inc.

Hook Line & Sinker, Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Alaska Case No. 17-00415).  Judge Gary
Spraker presides over the case.  David H. Bundy, Esq., is the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


HOOK LINE: Unsecureds to Recoup 23% at 6% Under 4th Amended Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hook Line& Sinker, Inc. (Humpy's) filed a supplemental disclosure
statement, dated Feb. 8, 2019, which updates its second amended
disclosure statement filed on Nov. 5, 2018.

The supplement discloses the filing of a fourth amended plan and
Humpy's opposition to Robert Jurasek's plan.

Because there is more cash available than was earlier forecast, and
because of the better-than-expected 2018 results, Humpy's has filed
a fourth amended plan of reorganization. Under this new plan,
general unsecured creditors (non-insider claims over $10,000) in
Class 1 will receive an initial distribution of $200,000
(approximately 23% of the allowed claims) on the Effective Date
(two weeks after the Bankruptcy Court approves the plan), and, if
the Debtor's new projections prove accurate, should be paid in full
by July of 2020. These claims will also receive interest at 6% from
the Effective Date. A Class 1 claim may elect Class 2 treatment and
received the lesser of $7,500 or 75% of the allowed claim on the
Effective Date.

Class 2 claims of $10,000 or less will receive one payment of 75%
of their claims on the Effective Date but may elect to be treated
in Class 1 instead.

The Debtor's Fourth Amended Plan provides that the $1.9 million
claim of Salamatof Native Association will be paid overtime, nearly
all after payment of the Class 1 and 2 claims. The Second Amended
Plan paid Salamatof partly by transfer of the 16% share ownerships
in Humpy's owned by Robert Jurasek and Dylan Buchholdt, but these
two shareholders declined to turn over their stock. So the Fourth
Amended Plan allows all the shareholders to keep their stock in
Humpy's.

The Debtor's Second Amended Plan was scheduled for a confirmation
hearing in the Bankruptcy Court on Dec. 11, 2018. Just before that
hearing Robert Jurasek, who owns 16% of the stock in Hook Line &
Sinker, Inc. asked for a delay so he could propose an alternative
plan. He filed his plan on Dec. 21, 2018. The main differences
between the two plans were changes in management and in ownership
of Humpy's. The Jurasek plan states that current management will be
terminated and Pete Burns will become the new general manager.

Humpy's and its majority owners do not agree with the Jurasek Plan.
In their view, there is no reason to terminate current management
and go back to a manager who ran the business during a time it was
much less successful. The majority shareholders also do not believe
it is fair or equitable to take ownership away from them now that
they have turned the business around so that all creditors can be
paid in full. Although Mr. Jurasek has arranged to borrow money to
make partial payments to creditors, the projections show that the
company can pay all its creditors without this new investment.

A copy of the Supplemental Disclosure Statement dated Feb. 8, 2019
is available at https://is.gd/qwiVUN from Pacermonitor.com at no
charge.

A copy of the Fourth Amended Plan is available at
https://is.gd/1CJ4Od from Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

              About Hook Line & Sinker Inc.

Hook Line & Sinker, Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Alaska Case No. 17-00415).  Judge Gary
Spraker presides over the case.  David H. Bundy, Esq., is the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


HOUT FENCING: Seeks to Hire Dale Ely as Auctioneer
--------------------------------------------------
Hout Fencing of Wyoming, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Wyoming to employ Dale Ely
Auctioneers, as auctioneer to the Debtor.

Hout Fencing requires Dale Ely to auction the machinery and
equipment of the Debtor.

Dale Ely will be paid a commission of 7.3% of the sales price.

Dale Ely, partner of Dale Ely Auctioneers, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Dale Ely can be reached at:

     Dale Ely
     DALE ELY AUCTIONEERS
     3925 Blue Sky Road
     Carpenter, WY 82054
     Tel: (719) 429-5000
     E-mail: daledely@msn.com

                 About Hout Fencing of Wyoming

Hout Fencing of Wyoming, Inc., is a fence contractor based in
Worland, Wyoming, offering bridge and barrier fence installation
and repair.  The company serves Cheyenne, Laramie, Casper, Buffalo,
Sheridan, Gillette, Rawlins, Rock Springs, Cody and New Mexico
areas.

Hout Fencing of Wyoming sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Wyo. Case No. 18-20423) on May 23, 2018.
In the petition signed by Dave Hout, president, the Debtor
disclosed $3.50 million in assets and $3.63 million in
liabilities.

Judge Cathleen D. Parker oversees the case.



ICON CONSTRUCTION: Hires Joyce W. Lindauer as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Icon Construction, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Texas to employ Joyce W. Lindauer
Attorney, PLLC, as counsel to the Debtor.

Icon Construction requires Joyce W. Lindauer to represent the
Debtor in the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy proceedings.

Joyce W. Lindauer will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                $225 to $395
     Paralegals                  $125

Joyce W. Lindauer will be paid a retainer in the amount of $16,717,
inclusive of the filing fee.

Joyce W. Lindauer will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Joyce W. Lindauer, partner of Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney, PLLC,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Joyce W. Lindauer can be reached at:

     Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq.
     Jeffery M. Veteto, Esq.
     JOYCE W. LINDAUER ATTORNEY, PLLC
     12720 Hillcrest Road, Suite 625
     Dallas, TX 75230
     Tel: (972) 503-4033
     Fax: (972) 503-4034

                    About Icon Construction

Icon Construction -- http://icon-construction.com/-- is a small
business general contractor specializing in design/build of
permanent modular and temporary modular buildings.  Since April 1,
1998 Icon Construction has been able to meet the space needs of
major markets, including military,education, administration
facilities, health care, government, commercial and residential
manufacturing.

Icon Construction, Inc., based in McKinney, TX, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 19-40279) on Feb. 1, 2019.  In
the petition signed by Mansour Khayal, president, the Debtor
estimated $500,000 to $1 million in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  The Hon. Brenda T. Rhoades oversees the
case.  Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq., at Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney,
PLLC, serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


IMMUCOR INC: Moody's Lowers CFR to 'Caa1' on Weakened Liquidity
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Immucor, Inc.'s ratings,
including the Corporate Family Rating (CFR) to Caa1 from B3 and the
Probability of Default Rating to Caa1-PD from B3-PD. Moody's also
downgraded the first lien senior secured bank credit facility
rating to B2 from B1 and the senior unsecured rating to Caa3 from
Caa2. The outlook is stable.

The downgrade of the CFR to Caa1 reflects the company's inability
to improve earnings over the last year, weakened cash flow and
liquidity, and rising refinancing risk. The company has recently
launched several new products, which may help stabilize market
share following a period of competitive losses due to delays in
launching new products. That said, Moody's views the blood typing
business as a very slow growth, highly competitive market. As a
result, Moody's believes Immucor's earnings growth outlook is
modest, making it challenging to significantly improve leverage
ahead of its 2021 debt maturity. Moody's estimates current adjusted
debt/EBITDA is around 8.5x.

Moody's took the following rating actions:

Immucor, Inc.

Ratings downgraded:

Corporate Family Rating, to Caa1 from B3

Probability of Default Rating, to Caa1-PD from B3-PD

Senior secured revolving credit facility, to B2 (LGD3) from B1
(LGD3)

Senior secured term loan, to B2 (LGD3) from B1 (LGD3)

Senior unsecured notes, to Caa3 (LGD5) from Caa2 (LGD5)

The outlook is stable.

Ratings Withdrawn:

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, SGL-3

RATINGS RATIONALE

The ratings are constrained by Immucor's very high financial
leverage, which is expected to remain above 8 times over the next
12-18 months. The company's high interest expense has resulted in
persistently weak free cash flow and some recent working capital
headwinds have resulted in a weakening of liquidity. The company
faces rising refinancing risk with significant debt maturities in
2021 and 2022. Further, the ratings reflect Immucor's moderate
scale, with high business concentration in the niche blood
transfusion market.

The ratings are supported by the recurring nature of Immucor's
revenues, given the company makes closed system instruments that
require the use of its own reagents. The ratings are also supported
by Immucor's diverse customer base, strong U.S. market presence and
history of product innovation.

The rating outlook is stable, reflecting Moody's expectation that
financial leverage and free cash flow to debt will only modestly
improve over the next 12 to 18 months.

Near term upward rating action is unlikely given the company's high
leverage, constrained liquidity and refinancing risk. If the
company materially improves earnings and free cash flow and
successfully addresses its upcoming debt maturities, Moody's could
upgrade the ratings. Specifically, if Immucor debt to EBITDA
approaches 6.5 times, Moody's could upgrade the ratings.

The ratings could be downgraded if there is further deterioration
in liquidity, or the company faces further earnings pressure,
leading Moody's to believe that the capital structure is untenable.
There could also be downward rating pressure if it becomes
increasingly likely that the company will pursue a transaction that
Moody's may consider to be a distressed exchange.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Medical Product
and Device Industry published in June 2017.

Headquartered in Norcross, Georgia, Immucor is a leading in-vitro
diagnostic blood typing and screening company. Immucor develops and
manufactures reagents and automated systems used by hospitals,
donor centers and reference laboratories. The company also operates
in the transplantation diagnostics niche through its LIFECODES
operation. Immucor is owned by TPG Capital. Immucor generates
annual revenues of approximately $380 million.


INNOVATION PHARMA: Funding Needed to Continue as Going Concern
--------------------------------------------------------------
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc., formerly Cellceutix Corporation,
filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss of
$3,979,000 on $0 of total revenue for the three months ended Dec.
31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $4,518,000 on $0 of total
revenue for the same period in 2017.

At Dec. 31, 2018 the Company had total assets of $4,407,000, total
liabilities of $8,643,000, and $4,236,000 in total stockholders'
deficit.

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Leo Ehrlich
states, "We have identified conditions and events that raise
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
At December 31, 2018, the Company's cash amounted to $0.7 million
and current liabilities amounted to $8.0 million, of which $6.7
million were payables to related parties with no immediate payment
terms.  The Company is a development stage pharmaceutical company
that has no sales as it does not have any products in the market
and will continue to not have any revenues until it begins to
market its products after it has obtained the necessary FDA
approval.  As a result, the Company expects to continue to incur
losses over the next 12 months from the date of this filing.
Accordingly, the Company's planned operations, including total
budgeted expenditures of approximately $13.5 million for the next
twelve months, raise doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.  If we are not able to continue as a going concern, it is
likely that holders of our common stock will lose all of their
investment.  Our condensed financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


"To continue as a going concern, we must secure additional funding
to support our current operating plan in the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2019.  The Company expects to seek to obtain additional
funding through business development activities (i.e. licensing and
partnerships) and future equity issuances.  There can be no
assurance as to the availability or terms upon which such financing
and capital might be available."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/uxyacN

Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc. (OTCMKTS: IPIX), formerly
Cellceutix Corporation, is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical
company.  The Company is engaged in developing therapies with
oncology, dermatology and antimicrobial applications.  The Company
owns the rights to various drug compounds, including Kevetrin
(thioureidobutyronitrile), which is its anti-cancer compound;
Prurisol (KM-133), which is in development for psoriasis, and
Brilacidin, which is its drug in a class of compounds known as
defensin-mimetics.


ISMAIL ARSLANGIRAY: Plan Admin's $320K Sale of Dupont Stock Okayed
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mary Jo Heston of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Washington authorized Mark D. Waldron, the plan
administrator ("PA") for the estate of Ismail Arslangiray, to enter
into the Compromise and Settlement Agreement in connection with the
sale of any and all interest the Estate holds in the shares of
stock of Dupont Grocery, Inc., to the Debtor for $319,800.

The Settlement Agreement executed by the parties is approved in its
entirety.

The sale is free and clear of any interest in such asset, including
but not limited to liens and encumbrances.  Unless paid at closing
and satisfied thereby, each lien or encumbrance will attach to the
proceeds, after payment of costs of sale and the like.

The sale is subject to that certain Order confirming the Chapter 11
Plan of Ismail Arslangiray and therefore exempt from excise taxes.


Notwithstanding Bankruptcy Rule 6004(g), the Order will be
effective immediately after its entry, absent a stay pending
appeal.

The Debtor will pay all outstanding and future fees and costs of
the Debtor's professionals (attorneys and CPAs), subject to the
limitation in the Settlement Agreement.

The Stipulated Injunction executed by the parties and attached to
the Motion is approved for entry by the Court and the Debtor will
be enjoined as described therein.

Upon full compliance of all terms of the Settlement Agreement and
following all payments required by the Debtor therein, PA will file
a declaration of compliance and a proposed order granting the
Debtor a general discharge.  Violation of the Stipulated
Injunction, as set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Stipulated
Injunction attached to the Motion, may be grounds for revocation of
the Debtor's discharge.

                   About Ismail Arslangiray

Ismail Arslangiray sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Wash.
Case No. 11-42290) on March 24, 2011.  

The Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan was confirmed in 2013.  The Court
appointed Mark D. Waldron as the plan administrator for the estate
of the Debtor.

As of January 2019, all assets of the bankruptcy estate have been
liquidated or abandoned
except for the following four assets: (1) Debtor's personal
residence located at 2906 North 30th Street, Tacoma, WA 98407, (2)
Debtor's 92.8 percent ownership in the outstanding shares of stock
in Dupont Grocery, Inc., (3) certain cash being held by the Plan
Administrator in the Estate account, and (4) Debtor's one-third
ownership interest in Dupont Town Square, LLC, which holds title to
certain vacant real property located in the City of Dupont,
Washington.



JC PLUMBING: Seeks to Hire Nixon Law as Attorney
------------------------------------------------
JC Plumbing, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Arkansas to employ The Nixon Law Firm,
as attorney to the Debtor.

JC Plumbing requires Nixon Law to:

   a. prepare records and reports as required by the Bankruptcy
      Rules, Interim Bankruptcy Rules and the Local Bankruptcy
      Rules;

   b. assist in the preparation of applications, motions, and
      proposed orders to be submitted to the Court;

   c. identify and prosecute claims and causes of action
      assertable by Applicant on behalf of the estate herein;

   d. examine proofs of claim previously filed and to be filed
      herein and the possible prosecution of objections to
      certain of such claims;

   e. advise the Debtor and prepare documents in connection with
      the contemplated ongoing operation of the Debtor's
      business;

   f. advise the Debtor and prepare documents in connection with
      the liquidation of the assets of the estate including
      analysis and collection of outstanding receivables;

   g. assist and advise the Debtor in performing his other
      official functions as set forth in the Bankruptcy Code; and

   h. examine of officers of the Debtor and other parties as to
      the acts, conduct, and property of the Debtor.

Nixon Law will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates.

Nixon Law will be paid a retainer in the amount of $15,000.

Nixon Law will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

David G. Nixon, partner of The Nixon Law Firm, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Nixon Law can be reached at:

     David G. Nixon, Esq.
     THE NIXON LAW FIRM
     4100 Wagon Wheel Road
     Springdale, AR 72762
     Tel: (479) 582-0020
     Fax: (479) 582-0030

                        About JC Plumbing

JC Plumbing, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
W.D. Ark. Case No. 5:19-bk-70328) on Feb. 6, 2019.  The Debtor
hired David G. Nixon, Esq., at The Nixon Law Firm, as counsel.



KPH CONSTRUCTION: Hires Kerkman & Dunn as Bankruptcy Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
KPH Construction Corp., and its debtor-affiliates seek authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Wisconsin to employ Kerkman & Dunn, as bankruptcy counsel to the
Debtor.

KPH Construction requires Kerkman & Dunn to:

   a. advise and assist the Debtors with respect to their duties
      and powers under the Bankruptcy Code;

   b. advise the Debtors on the conduct of these chapter 11
      cases, including the legal and administrative requirements
      of operating in chapter 11;

   c. attend meetings and negotiate with representatives of the
      creditors and other parties in interest;

   d. prosecute actions on the behalf of the Debtors, defend
      actions commenced against the Debtors, and represent the
      Debtors' interests in negotiations concerning litigation in
      which the Debtors are involved, including objections to
      claims filed against the Debtors' estates;

   e. prepare pleadings in connection with this chapter 11 case
      including motions, applications, answers, orders, reports,
      and papers necessary or otherwise beneficial to the
      administration of the Debtors' estate;

   f. advise the Debtors in connection with any potential sale of
      assets;

   g. appear before the Court to represent the interests of the
      Debtors' estate;

   h. assist the Debtors in preparing, negotiating and
      implementing a plan, and advise them with respect to any
      rejection of a plan and reformulation of a plan, if
      necessary;

   i. assist and advise the Debtors in state court actions
      related to judgments and collection actions initiated by or
      against the Debtors that are necessary for an effective
      reorganization; and

   j. perform all other necessary or appropriate legal services
      for the Debtors in connection with the prosecution of this
      chapter 11 case, including (i) analyzing the Debtors'
      leases and contracts and the assumption and assignment or
      rejection thereof, (ii) analyzing the validity of liens
      against the Debtors, and (iii) advising the Debtors on
      transactional and litigation matters.

Kerkman & Dunn will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Jerome R. Kerkman                   $425
     Evan P. Schmit                      $375
     Gregory M. Schrieber                $350
     Student Associate                   $150
     Non-Attorney Paraprofessionals      $75

Prior to the petition date, Kerkman & Dunn performed prepetition
legal services for the Debtors in an aggregate amount of $24,642 in
fees and $5,358 in costs, for a total amount of $30,000.  After
applying the Firm's prepetition fees and costs, it is  holding $0
in its client trust account as security for services and expenses
incurred during the Chapter 11 case.

Kerkman & Dunn will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Evan P. Schmit, partner of Kerkman & Dunn, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Kerkman & Dunn can be reached at:

     Evan P. Schmit, Esq.
     KERKMAN & DUNN
     839 N. Jefferson St., Suite 400
     Milwaukee, WI 53202-3722
     Tel: (414) 277-8200
     Fax: (414) 277-0100

                  About KPH Construction Corp.

Founded in 1999, KPH Construction, KPH Environmental and KHP
Services are providers of commercial construction services.  Triple
H is a holding company.  Keith P. Harenda is the sole member and
manager of Triple H, and the sole shareholder and president of KPH
Construction and KPH Environmental. Harenda is the manager of KPH
Services.  The KPH Debtors collectively employ approximately 30
people in the operations of their construction business at projects
throughout Wisconsin.

KPH Construction Corp. and three affiliates, namely KPH
Environmental Corp., KPH Construction Services, LLC, and Triple H
Holdings, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Wis. Lead
Case No. 19-20939) on Feb. 6, 2019.  In the petition signed by
Keith P. Harenda, president, KPH Construction estimated $1 million
to $10 million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in
liabilities.  The Hon. Beth E. Hanan oversees the cases.  Evan P.
Schmit, Esq., at Kerkman & Dunn, serves as bankruptcy counsel to
the Debtors.


L&R DEVELOPMENT: Court Dismisses Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Brian K. Tester granted Movants Hector Noel Roman
Ramos, Myrna Enid Perez Vega, the conjugal partnership formed
between them and NNR enterprises' motion to dismiss the chapter 11
case of Debtor L&R Development & Investment Corp.

Movant’s allegation are numerous (1) that there is a continuing
loss or diminution of the estate and an absence of the likelihood
of rehabilitation; (2) that Debtor has failed to timely pay taxes
after the date of the order for relief; (3) that Debtor has failed
to file monthly operating reports (MOR) in a timely manner; (4)
that Debtor has failed to confirm a plan within a reasonable time;
and (5) that Debtor has failed to pay any fees or charges required
under chapter 23 or title 28.

The Debtor alleges that all the MOR's have been filed, albeit
several of them just a few days late. As to the lateness in filing
the November 2018 MOR, Debtor's state that it was an unfortunate
oversight but that given the static nature of the Debtor's finances
dating back to 2017, it resulted in harmless error. As to the other
allegations, the Debtor's position is that all the other causes
argued by the Movants are self-serving and in bad faith since they
have been caused or are a consequence of Movants' own actions.

After considering the pleadings before the court, the parties'
proffers and the testimony of one of Debtor's principals, the court
finds that cause for dismissal has been established, and, thus,
grants Movant's motion to dismiss. The court finds that Movant has
met their burden by a preponderance of the evidence standard only
as to the untimely filing of the MORs to prove its position that
there is cause for either conversion or dismissal of the instant
case.

The court holds that the Debtor has not demonstrated nor alleged
"unusual circumstances" in the instant case. Debtor has failed to
allege, and much less meet its burden, that there are unusual
circumstances showing that conversion or dismissal is not in the
best interest of the estate and creditors.

The standard for choosing between conversion or dismissal based on
"the best interest of creditors and the estate" implies application
of a balancing test by the bankruptcy court. The court considered
three factors: (1) the ongoing litigation between the Debtor and
Movants over a substantial sum of money meant to fund a large
portion of the Plan; (2) the bulk of the estate consists of
encumbered undeveloped real properties; and (3) a chapter 7
trustee's inability to fund the cost of such litigation. As such,
the court concludes that dismissal, rather than conversion to
chapter 7, is in the best interest of the estate.

A copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated Feb. 11, 2019 is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb16-08792-11-234.pdf

                 About L&R Development

L&R Development & Investment Corp. is a real estate development and
investment corporation that was created on May 31, 2002, by two
main partners, Hector Noel Roman and Jose Joaquin Lopez.  

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. P.R. Case No. 16-08792) on Nov. 1, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Joaquin Lopez, president.  At the time of
the filing, the Debtor disclosed $3.05 million in assets and $5.56
million in liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Brian K.
Tester.

Carmen Conde Torres, Esq., of C. Conde & Assoc. represents the
Debtor.  Inmuebles Bienes Raices, LLC, has been tapped as realtor
to the Debtor.

On March 15, 2017, the Debtor filed a Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization and disclosure statement.


LIFE ENHANCEMENT: Creditor Files Limited Objection to Disclosures
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Creditor Samuel Kornhauser filed a limited objection to the
Trustee's proposed joint disclosure statement and liquidating plan
filed on Jan. 7, 2019.

The purpose of Kornhauser's limited objection is not to prevent
ultimate confirmation of the plan or preclude disbursement of the
projected $255,801.43 to unsecured creditors. Rather, it is
respectfully requested that plan confirmation be confirmed and
considered in conjunction with the Trustee's forthcoming fee
application and disbursement report, especially considering the
claimed $4,067,452,28 disbursement amount, which the statement and
plan use to calculate the Trustee's compensation. In addition, it
is requested that the proposed distributions to several other
creditors be disallowed and their proposed distribution be
reallocated to Kornhauser and the other creditors.

A copy of Samuel Kornhauser's Limited Objection is available at
https://is.gd/JsbIAb from Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that allowed
unsecured claims will not bear interest, and will be paid. The
Trustee will make one pro-rata payment to general unsecured claims
after payment in full of all administrative and priority claims,
projected to be in the spring of 2019, and distribution is
estimated at 7%.

The Plan will be funded by cash generated from (1) operations of
the Debtor's business and (2) the liquidation of substantially all
of the Debtor's assets.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Jan. 7, 2019, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/yalbj2hh from PacerMonitor.com at
no charge.

Attorneys for Samuel Kornhauser:

     Karen M. Ayarbe, Esq.
     LEACH KERN GRUCHOW ANDERSON SONG
     NV Bar No. 3358
     5421 Kietzke Lane, Ste. 200
     Reno, Nevada 89511
     Tel: (775) 324-5930
     Email: kayarbe@lkglawfirm.com

              About Life Enhancement Products

Life Enhancement Products, Inc. ("LEP") manufactures and provides
nutritional supplements with unique formulations for general
health, memory enhancement, blood sugar maintenance, cognitive
enhancement, among others, based on formulations derived from known
formulators across the country.  The raw materials purchased for
the products are derived from the highest-quality,
pharmaceutical-grade ingredients and are packaged under clean-room
conditions, and materials undergo lab testing to confirm purity.
LEP offers its services through direct Internet sales to the public
or through medical providers.

Life Enhancement Products sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.
Nev. Case No. 14-51572) on Sept. 17, 2014.  Judge Bruce T. Beesley
is assigned to the case.  The petition was signed by Wallace Block,
president.  The Debtor estimated assets at $285,866 and liabilities
at $1.94 million.  The Debtor tapped Alan R Smith, Esq., at The Law
Offices of Alan R. Smith as counsel.

On April 17, 2015, the Court approved the appointment of James S.
Proctor as Chapter 11 trustee.  The Trustee continues to operate
the Debtor's business and manage its financial affairs pursuant to
Sections 1106(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code.  

The Trustee tapped Louis M. Bubala, Esq., at Kaemper Crowell as
attorney.


LOYSVILLE STRUCTURES: Hires Omar & Merv's as Auctioneer
-------------------------------------------------------
Loysville Structures seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Pennsylvania to employ Omar & Merv's
Auctioneering, LLC, as auctioneer to the Debtor.

Loysville Structures requires Omar & Merv's to auction the Debtor's
inventory, supplies and finished goods having an aggregate
scheduled value of $170,761.

Omar & Merv's will be paid a commission of 6% of the gross sales
price.

Omar & Merv's will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Mervin Glick, auctioneer at Omar & Merv's Auctioneering, LLC,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Omar & Merv's can be reached at:

     Mervin Glick
     OMAR & MERV'S AUCTIONEERING, LLC
     1381 Honeysuckle Hollow Road
     Elliottsburg, PA 17024
     Tel: (717) 438-3345
     E-mail: O.MAuctions1@yahoo.com

                  About Loysville Structures

Loysville Structures, a building contractor in Loysville,
Pennsylvania, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 19-00244) on Jan. 21, 2019. At the
time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$500,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  The case is
assigned to Judge Henry W. Van Eck.  CGA Law Firm is the Debtor's
legal counsel.


M.S. MOELLER: April 4 Approval Hearing on Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Nancy V. Alquist is set to hold a hearing on April
4, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. to consider approval of M.S. Moeller
Cabinetry & Millwork, Inc.'s disclosure statement describing its
chapter 11 plan dated Feb. 5, 2019.

March 15, 2019, is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the Disclosure Statement.

          About M.S. Moeller Cabinetry & Millwork

M.S. Moeller Cabinetry & Millwork, Inc., filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-12888) on March 6,
2018.  The Debtor is represented by Miller & Miller, LLP.



MAREMONT CORP: Asbestos Committee Taps Robinson & Cole as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A committee representing asbestos claimants in Maremont
Corporation's Chapter 11 case seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to employ Robinson &
Cole LLP as its counsel.

The committee requires Robinson & Cole to:

     a. assist the committee in evaluating the Chapter 11 filings
of Maremont and its affiliates;

     b. assist the committee in its discussions with the Debtors,
the future claims representative, and other parties-in-interest
regarding the overall administration of the cases;

     c. assist the committee in its examination and analysis of the
conduct of the Debtors' affairs;

     d. advise the committee with regard to any causes of action
belonging to the Debtors' estates;

     e. assist the committee in analyzing and investigating the
acts, conduct, assets, liabilities, corporate structure and
financial position of the Debtors;

     f. review documents filed and to be filed with the court;

     g. confer with the professionals retained by the Debtors, the
future claims representative, and other parties- in-interest as
well as with the other professionals to be employed by the
committee;

     j. coordinate the receipt and dissemination of information
prepared by and received from bankruptcy professionals employed in
connection with the Debtors' cases;

     k. participate in examinations of the Debtors and other
witnesses if necessary;

     l. advise the committee regarding any litigation and proposed
settlement; and

     m. negotiate and formulate any modifications to the
prepackaged plan of reorganization and section 524(g) personal
injury trust for the Debtors that may be proposed.

RC's current standard hourly rates are:

     Partners        $360-$905
     Of Counsel      $345-$715
     Associates      $250-$530
     Paralegals      $180-$280

     Natalie D. Ramsey    $905
     Mark A. Fink         $715
     Laurie A. Krepto     $550
     Katherine M. Fix     $500

Natalie Ramsey, Esq., a partner at Robinson & Cole, disclosed in a
court filing that she and her firm do not represent any interest
adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

The firm can be reached through:

     Natalie D. Ramsey
     Robinson & Cole LLP
     1000 N. West Street, Suite 1200
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Phone: 267-386-4815
     Email: nramsey@rc.com

                       About Maremont Corp.

Maremont Corporation and three affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-10118).  The affiliated
debtors are Maremont Exhaust Products, Inc., AVM, Inc., and Former
Ride Control Operating Company, Inc.

Headquartered in Troy, Michigan, Maremont is a Delaware corporation
and wholly-owned subsidiary of Meritor, Inc., a public company
organized under the laws of the State of Indiana.  Historically,
Maremont and its subsidiaries manufactured, distributed, and sold
aftermarket friction products.  Certain of the products
manufactured and sold contained asbestos.  However, Maremont and
its subsidiaries have not manufactured or sold any
asbestos-containing products since 1978.  Maremont divested its
business lines over time.  By 2013, the Debtors had ceased all
operations and divested all remaining operating assets.

Maremont estimated $10 million to $50 million in total assets and
$100 million to $500 million in liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Debtors tapped Sidley Austin LLP as its legal counsel; Cole
Schotz P.C. as Delaware counsel; and Donlin, Recano & Company,
Inc., as claims and noticing agent.


MAREMONT CORP: Asbestos Panel Taps Legal Analysis as Consultant
---------------------------------------------------------------
The committee representing asbestos claimants in Maremont
Corporation's Chapter 11 case seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to employ Legal
Analysis Systems, Inc. as its consultant.

Legal Analysis will provide these services:

     (a) develop oversight methods and procedures to enable the
committee to fulfill its responsibilities of reviewing and
analyzing any proposed disclosure statement, plan and other similar
documents;

     (b) review and analyse asbestos claims database and resolution
of various asbestos claims;

     (c) estimate the liability for asbestos claims that are
pending as well as those that will be filed in the future;

     (d) provide quantitative analyses of claims resolution
procedures, including estimation of payments that would be made to
various types of claims under those alternatives and development of
cash flow analysis of an asbestos compensation trust under
alternative procedures;

     (e) evaluate reports and opinions of experts and consultants
retained by other parties;

     (f) provide quantitative analyses of other matters related to
asbestos claims if requested by the committee; and

     (g) provide expert testimony on matters within Legal Analysis'
expertise, if requested by the committee.

The professionals who are expected to provide the services and
their hourly rates are:

     Mark Peterson     $800
     Dan Relles        $540
     Pat Ebener        $335

Mark Peterson, principal of Legal Analysis, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as defined in
section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Legal Analysis can be reached through:

      Mark A. Peterson, Ph.D.
      Legal Analysis Systems
      970 Calle Arroyo
      Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
      Tel: (805)499-3572

                       About Maremont Corp.

Maremont Corporation and three affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-10118).  The affiliated
debtors are Maremont Exhaust Products, Inc., AVM, Inc., and Former
Ride Control Operating Company, Inc.

Headquartered in Troy, Michigan, Maremont is a Delaware corporation
and wholly-owned subsidiary of Meritor, Inc., a public company
organized under the laws of the State of Indiana.  Historically,
Maremont and its subsidiaries manufactured, distributed, and sold
aftermarket friction products.  Certain of the products
manufactured and sold contained asbestos.  However, Maremont and
its subsidiaries have not manufactured or sold any
asbestos-containing products since 1978.  Maremont divested its
business lines over time.  By 2013, the Debtors had ceased all
operations and divested all remaining operating assets.

Maremont estimated $10 million to $50 million in total assets and
$100 million to $500 million in liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Debtors tapped Sidley Austin LLP as their legal counsel; Cole
Schotz P.C. as Delaware counsel; and Donlin, Recano & Company,
Inc., as claims and noticing agent.


MATRIX BROADCASTING: Disclosures OK'd; March 21 Plan Hearing
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas
entered an order approving Matrix Broadcasting, LLC, and Matrix
Broadcasting Holdings, LLC's disclosure statement support of an
amended joint chapter 11 plan of liquidation.

Deadline for ballots for accepting or rejecting the Plan, and
objections to confirmation of the plan is March 14, 2019.

The hearing on confirmation of the Plan will be on March 21, 2019,
at 11:00 a.m. Central Time.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that based on the
General Unsecured Claims reflected in the Debtors' Schedules or
timely filed proofs of claim, and excluding the Claims of Alpha,
Digity, Star Media, and Handy, on the Effective Date, the Debtors
estimate there will be approximately $56,000 in General Unsecured
Claims.

A redlined version of the Disclosure Statement dated January 16,
2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yadxmxso from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                   About Matrix Broadcasting

Matrix Broadcasting, LLC owns and operates two radio stations, WZSR
(105.5 FM, "The Star") and WFXF (103.9 FM, "The Fox").  The
Stations are operated from Matrix's studios in Crystal Lake,
Illinois.  Matrix Broadcasting Holdings, LLC, which previously
served as the sole member of Matrix, has no operations or assets
but is a guarantor of Matrix's senior secured obligations.  The
Company was formed out of the 2014 acquisition by Digity Companies,
LLC, of 33 radio stations from NextMedia Group Inc., which itself
successfully emerged from Chapter 11 in 2010.

Matrix Broadcasting, LLC, and Matrix Broadcasting Holdings, LLC,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
Tex. Case No. 18-31045 and 18-31046) on March 27, 2018.  In its
petition signed by Peter Handy, CEO, Matrix LLC disclosed $1
million to $10 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities. Matrix Holdings, LLC disclosed $0 to $50 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.

The Hon. Christine M. Gravelle presides over the case.

The Debtors tapped Michael P. Cooley, Esq., Keith M. Aurzada, Esq.,
and Lindsey L. Robin, Esq., of Bryan Cave LLP as bankruptcy
counsel.


MEYERS-STERNER INDUSTRIES: Seeks to Hire Stormant as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------------------
Meyers-Sterner Industries, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida to hire John F.
Stormant, CPA, PA, as its accountant.

The firm will assist the Debtor in the preparation of financial
statements, income tax returns and bookkeeping entries.  It will
also provide general consulting services on various income tax
matters upon request.

Stormant's hourly rates range from $75 to $250.

The firm does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor,
according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     John F. Stormant
     John F. Stormant, CPA, PA
     14706 Main Street
     P.O. Box 579
     Alachua, FL 32616
     Telephone: (386) 462-5646
     Fax: (386) 462-0457
     Email: john@jscpa1040.com

                 About Meyers-Sterner Industries

Meyers-Sterner Industries, Inc., manages a real investment property
located at 818 9th St. E., Glencoe, Minnesota.

Meyers-Sterner Industries filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 18-08047) on Dec. 31, 2018, estimating
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is
represented by Seldon J. Childers, Esq., at ChildersLaw LLC.


MGTF RADIO: Amends Plan to Modify Treatment of Unsecured Claims
---------------------------------------------------------------
MGTF Radio Company, LLC, and WPNT, Inc., filed a first amended
joint chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

The treatment of allowed general unsecured claims has been slightly
modified in this latest filing.

The holders of Other Allowed General Unsecured Claims in Class 5
will receive Cash in an amount equal to such Claim on the Effective
Date or within 30 days of such claim becoming an Other Allowed
General Unsecured Claims if such allowance occurs after the
effective date.

On the Effective Date, all Existing Equity Interests (including
common stock, preferred stock, and any options, warrants, profit
interest units, or rights to acquire any equity interests) in
Debtor WPNT will be transferred to a newly formed holding company,
owned by the Existing Equity Holders ("WPNT Holdco, Inc."). WPNT
Holdco, Inc. will establish a new wholly-owned limited liability
corporation ("WPNT, LL"). Debtor WPNT will merge into WPNT, LLC
with WPNT, LLC surviving ("Reorganized Debtor WPNT"). Pursuant to
the Plan, New Equity in Reorganized Debtor WPNT will be issued and
allocated in accordance with the Equity Allocation Mechanism and
the Plan Term Sheet.

A copy of the First Amended Joint Plan is available at
https://is.gd/5WxCGD from Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

                  About MGTF Radio Company

MGTF Radio Company, LLC, which conducts business under the name
Steel City Media, is a multimedia company offering print, radio,
and digital advertising solutions. Its stations include Country
KBEQ (Q104), Country KFKF, Top 40 KMXV (MIX 93.3), and AC KCKC (KC
102.1).  The company was founded in 1984 and is based in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, with a location in Kansas City,
Missouri.

MGTF Radio Company sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case Nos. 18-41671 and 18-41672)
on March 20, 2018. In the petitions signed by Michael J.
Frischling, vice-president, MGTF Radio and WPNT estimated assets
and liabilities of $50 million to $100 million.

The Debtors hire Carmody MacDonald P.C. as their legal counsel; and
Smithwick & Belendiuk, P.C., as special counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 cases.


MIDWAY OILFIELD: Taps PPL Group as Auctioneer
---------------------------------------------
Midway Oilfield Constructors, Inc., received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to hire PPL
Group, LLC as auctioneer.

The firm will assist the Debtor in the sale of equipment, machinery
and other items through live and online auction.

PPL will be entitled to a 15% buyer's premium charged to on-site
buyers and an 18% buyer's premium charged to online buyers (with
15% retained by the firm and 3% retained exclusively by the host of
the online auction service provider).  If the items are sold at
auction, the Debtor will pay an amount not to exceed $100,000 to
repair equipment.  

Alternatively, if the items are sold by PPL to a buyer who will
continue business operations, such sale must be completed within 45
days from court approval of the firm's employment and the Debtor's
motion to sell the items.  In such a case, the buyer would be
charged a 7.5% buyer's premium, plus work-related expenses.

PPL is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     David Muslin
     PPL Group, LLC
     105 Revere Drive, Suite C
     Northbrook, IL 60062
     Phone: 224.927.5300 / 224.927.5301
     Email: david@pplgroupllc.com

                About Midway Oilfield Constructors

Midway Oilfield Constructors, Inc., provides construction services
to the upstream, midstream, and downstream sectors of the oil and
gas industry.  Based out of Midway, Texas, Midway provides services
across the State of Texas and Oklahoma.

On Aug. 15, 2018, Midway Oilfield Constructors filed its voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (S.D.
Tex. Case No. 18-34567).  The Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities as
of the bankruptcy filing.  Judge Marvin Isgur is the case judge.  

The Debtor tapped Hoover Slovacek LLP as its legal counsel.
Hrdlicka White Williams & Aughtry, is the special tax counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Nov. 14, 2018.  Lugenbuhl Wheaton Peck
Rankin & Hubbard is the committee's bankruptcy counsel.


MMAN LLC: Seeks to Hire Christopher Lee as Attorney
---------------------------------------------------
MMAN, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas to employ The Law office of Christopher
Lee Phillippe, as attorney to the Debtor.

MMAN, LLC requires Christopher Lee to:

   (a) provide legal advice with respect to the Debtor's
       rights and duties as debtor in possession and continued
       business operations;

   (b) assist, advise and represent the Debtor in analyzing the
       Debtor's capital structure, investigating the extent and
       validity of liens, cash collateral stipulations or
       contested matters;

   (c) assist, advise and represent the Debtor in post petition
       financing transactions;

   (d) assist, advise and represent the Debtor in the sale of
       certain assets;

   (e) assist, advise and represent the Debtor in the formulation
       of a disclosure statement and plan of reorganization and
       to assist the Debtor in obtaining confirmation and
       consummation of a plan of reorganization;

   (f) assist, advise and represent the Debtor in any manner
       relevant to preserving and protecting the Debtor's estate;

   (g) investigate and prosecute preference, fraudulent transfer
       and other actions arising under Debtor's bankruptcy
       avoiding powers;

   (h) prepare on behalf the Debtor all necessary applications,
       motions, answers, orders, reports, and other legal papers;

   (i) appear in Court and to protect the interests of the Debtor
       before the Court;

   (j) assist the Debtor in administrative matters;

   (k) perform all other legal services for the Debtor which may
       be necessary and proper in these proceedings;

   (l) assist, advise and represent the Debtor in any litigation
       matters, including, but not limited to, adversary
       proceedings;

   (m) continue to assist and advise the Debtor in general
       corporate and other matters related to the successful
       reorganization of the Debtor; and

   (n) provide other legal advice and services, as requested by
       the Debtor, from time to time.

Christopher Lee will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys            $250
     Paralegals           $100

Christopher Lee will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Christopher Lee Phillippe, a partner at The Law office of
Christopher Lee Phillippe, assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtor and its estates.

Christopher Lee can be reached at:

     Christopher Lee Phillippe, Esq.
     THE LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER LEE PHILLIPPE
     104 North Expressway
     Brownsville, TX 78521
     Tel: (956) 544-6096
     Fax: (956) 982-19-21
     E-mail: clphillippe@cameroncountylawyer.com

                         About MMAN, LLC

MMAN, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Case No. 19-10036) on Jan. 30, 2019, to: (i) protect the Debtor
from the collection efforts of the Internal Revenue Service; and
(ii) provide the means to propose a reasonable and feasible of
repayment plan for taxes owed to the Internal Revenue Service.  The
Debtor hired the Law Office of Christopher Lee Phillippe, as
counsel.


MONROE BUS: Seeks to Hire Goldberg Weprin as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Monroe Bus Corp. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of New York to hire Goldberg Weprin Finkel
Goldstein LLP as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding the operation of its
business and management of its property; give legal advice
regarding its duties under the Bankruptcy Code; and provide other
services in connection with its Chapter 11 case.

Goldberg will charge these hourly fees:

     Partner              $575
     Associate        $275 - $425
     Paralegal         $85 - $120

The firm received a retainer of $20,000 from the Debtor, plus
$2,000 for work-related expenses including the filing fee.

Kevin Nash, Esq., at Goldberg, disclosed in a court filing that he
and other members of the firm do not have any interest, which would
disqualify the firm from being employed as legal counsel for the
Debtor.

Goldberg can be reached through:

     Ted J. Donovan, Esq.    
     Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP
     1501 Broadway, 22nd Floor
     New York, NY 10036
     Tel: (212)-301-6943
     Fax: (212)-422-6836
     Email: Tdonovan@gwfglaw.com

          - and -

     Kevin J. Nash, Esq.
     Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP
     1501 Broadway, 22nd Floor
     New York, NY 10036
     Tel: (212) 221-5700
     Email: knash@gwfglaw.com

                      About Monroe Bus Corp.

Monroe Bus Corp. is a bus company providing commuter transportation
in the Orthodox community.  It provides commuter transportation
with daily scheduled routes for over 300,000 passengers annually as
well as charter service for Yeshiva college students. The company
maintains its offices and bus yard at 60 Nostrand Avenue, Brooklyn

Monroe Bus Corp. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. N.Y. Case No. 19-40076) on January 7,
2019.  The Debtor disclosed $1,805,393 in assets and $410,216 in
liabilities as of Dec. 26, 2018.

The case has been assigned to Judge Carla E. Craig.


MONROE BUS: Seeks to Hire Solomon Hirsch as Accountant
------------------------------------------------------
Monroe Bus Corp. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of New York to hire Solomon Hirsch CPA, P.C.
as its accountant.

The services to be provided by the firm include the preparation of
reports, analysis of claims and the preparation of financial
statements in support of the Debtor's Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.

The firm will charge these hourly fees:

     Perry Dinter     $275
     Associates       $175
     Assistants       $125

Perry Dinter, a partner at Solomon Hirsch, disclosed in a court
filing that the firm is "disinterested" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Solomon Hirsch can be reached through:

     Perry Dinter
     Solomon Hirsch CPA, P.C.
     358 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1406
     New York, NY 10001
     Email: pdinter@hirschcpa.com

                      About Monroe Bus Corp.

Monroe Bus Corp. is a bus company providing commuter transportation
in the Orthodox community.  It provides commuter transportation
with daily scheduled routes for over 300,000 passengers annually as
well as charter service for Yeshiva college students. The company
maintains its offices and bus yard at 60 Nostrand Avenue, Brooklyn

Monroe Bus Corp. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. N.Y. Case No. 19-40076) on Jan. 7,
2019.  The Debtor disclosed $1,805,393 in assets and $410,216 in
liabilities as of Dec. 26, 2018.

The case is assigned to Judge Carla E. Craig.


MONROE BUS: Seeks to Retain Bruce Levinson as Appellate Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Monroe Bus Corp. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of New York to retain Bruce Levinson, Esq., as
its litigation and appellate counsel.

Mr. Levinson will continue to represent the Debtor in its appeal of
the order, which granted a writ of assistance to the City of New
York to evict the Debtor from its office and bus yard in Brooklyn,
New York.

The attorney charges an hourly fee of $515.  The rate for paralegal
services is $105 per hour.

Mr. Levinson disclosed in a court filing that he does not hold any
interest adverse to the Debtor's bankruptcy estate.

Mr. Levinson maintains an office at:

     Bruce Levinson, Esq.
     805 Third Avenue, 12th Floor
     New York, NY 10022
     Phone: (212) 750-9898
     Fax: (212) 750-2536
     Email: bruce.levinson@blevlaw.com

                      About Monroe Bus Corp.

Monroe Bus Corp. is a bus company providing commuter transportation
in the Orthodox community.  It provides commuter transportation
with daily scheduled routes for over 300,000 passengers annually as
well as charter service for Yeshiva college students. The company
maintains its offices and bus yard at 60 Nostrand Avenue, Brooklyn

Monroe Bus Corp. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. N.Y. Case No. 19-40076) on Jan. 7,
2019.  The Debtor disclosed $1,805,393 in assets and $410,216 in
liabilities as of Dec. 26, 2018.

The case is assigned to Judge Carla E. Craig.


MYOVANT SCIENCES: Needs More Capital to Continue as Going Concern
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Myovant Sciences Ltd. filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $70,633,000 on $0 of revenue for the three
months ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $41,777,000
on $0 of revenue for the same period in 2017.

At Dec. 31, 2018 the Company had total assets of $201,670,000,
total liabilities of $154,935,000, and $46,735,000 in total
stockholders' equity.

Myovant Sciences states, "The Company has evaluated whether there
are conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern within one year after the date the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements are issued.  During the
nine months ended December 31, 2018, the Company incurred net
losses of $198.5 million and used $171.0 million of cash and cash
equivalents in operations.  The Company expects to continue to
incur significant and increasing operating losses and negative cash
flows as it continues to develop its product candidates and
prepares for the potential future regulatory approvals and
commercialization of relugolix.  The Company has not generated any
revenue to date and does not expect to generate product revenue
unless and until it successfully completes development and obtains
regulatory approval for one of its product candidates.  Based on
its current operating plan, the Company expects that its existing
cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund its operating
expenses and capital expenditure requirements through at least the
first quarter of its fiscal year ending March 31, 2020, and to
enable it to announce top-line data from the first Phase 3 clinical
trial for one of its women's health clinical programs.  This
estimate is based on the Company's current assumptions, including
assumptions relating to its ability to manage its spend, that might
prove to be wrong, and it could use its available capital resources
sooner than it currently expects.  These funds will not be
sufficient to enable the Company to complete all necessary
development activities and commercially launch relugolix.  The
Company anticipates that it will continue to incur net losses for
the foreseeable future.

"To continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other
things, additional capital resources.  The Company continually
assesses multiple options to obtain additional funding to support
its operations, including through financing activities in public or
private capital markets, financing arrangements with Roivant
Sciences, potential business development activities and cost
containment measures.  Management can provide no assurances that
any sources of a sufficient amount of financing will be available
to the Company on favorable terms, if at all.  Although the Company
believes that it will continue to raise capital to fund its
operations as it has in the past, ASC 240-40, Going Concern, does
not allow the Company to consider future financing activities in
its assessment of the Company's future cash burn for the purpose of
its liquidity assessment.

"These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern for the one-year period following
the date that these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements were issued.  The accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and footnotes have been prepared
on the basis that the Company will continue as a going concern, and
do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future
effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the
amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the
possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/B69jaC

Myovant Sciences Ltd., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company,
focuses on developing and commercializing therapies for women's
health and endocrine diseases.  The company's lead product is
relugolix, an oral, once-daily, small molecule that acts as a
gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist for the
treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding related with uterine
fibroids, endometriosis-associated pain, and advanced prostate
cancer.  It is also developing MVT-602, an oligopeptide kisspeptin
agonist, for the treatment of female infertility as part of the
hormonal preparation used in assisted reproduction.  Myovant
Sciences Ltd. has partnership with Flo Health to create a digital
tool to screen for heavy menstrual bleeding.  The company was
formerly known as Roivant Endocrinology Ltd. and changed its name
to Myovant Sciences Ltd. in May 2016.  The company was founded in
2016 and is based in London, the United Kingdom.  Myovant Sciences
Ltd. is a subsidiary of Roivant Sciences Ltd.



NEIGHBORS LEGACY: Files Chapter 11 Joint Plan of Liquidation
------------------------------------------------------------
Neighbors Legacy Holdings, Inc. and affiliates filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas a disclosure
statement for their joint plan of liquidation dated Feb. 8, 2019.

The Plan contemplates that any assets remaining in the Debtors'
Estates as of the Effective Date will vest in a Liquidating Trust
for liquidation for the benefit of Holders of Allowed Claims as set
forth in the Plan and the Liquidating Trust Agreement. The
Liquidating Trust is to be managed by a Liquidating Trustee. The
Liquidating Trustee will be responsible for taking the necessary
and appropriate actions to administer the remaining assets of the
Debtors' estates, and to proceed with an orderly, expeditious, and
efficient wind-down and distribution of the remaining assets of the
Debtors in accordance with the terms of the Plan.

Class 4 under the plan consists of the general unsecured claims.
The Holder of the Prepetition Deficiency Claim will receive its Pro
Rata share of the Unsecured Creditor Trust Interests; provided,
however, the Distributions on account of such interest shall be
limited as follows: (i) Prepetition Deficiency Claim will not
receive any recovery from the first $1,000,000 of Distributions
from the Unsecured Creditor Trust Cash; (ii) Prepetition Deficiency
Claim will receive the entire amount of the first $125,000 of
Distributions after the first $1,000,000 of Distributions from the
Unsecured Creditor Trust Cash; and (iii) Prepetition Deficiency
Claim will share Pro Rata with other General Unsecured Claims on
any Distributions from the Unsecured Creditor Trust Cash over
$1,125,000.

The Plan is being proposed as a joint plan of liquidation for all
of the Debtors. The Plan constitutes a motion for deemed
consolidation of the Debtors and their respective Estates solely
for purposes of voting on the Plan, confirming the Plan, and making
Distributions pursuant to the Plan. Deemed consolidation is a
condition precedent to Confirmation. Consolidation of the Debtors'
Estates is for the limited purpose of making Distributions to
holders of Allowed Claims to ease an administrative burden on the
Debtors, their Estates, and the Plan Trustees. Accordingly, voting
on the Plan shall be conducted and counted on a consolidated basis.
On the Effective Date, (a) the assets of the Debtors will be merged
and/or treated as if they are merged for the purpose of paying
Allowed Claims against the Debtors; (b) any Claim filed or asserted
against any of the Debtors will be deemed a Claim against all of
the Debtors, solely for the purposes of voting and Distributions
pursuant to the Plan (and any duplication of claims arising from
both primary operative documents and guaranty and/or other
secondary obligations shall be eliminated and all such claims
against the Debtors will be treated as a single claim that
eliminates such duplications); and (c) all Intercompany Claims and
Interests will be eliminated. Such consolidation will not affect
the legal and corporate structure of the Debtors nor affect Causes
of Action, including Avoidance Actions.

The Debtors believe that deemed consolidation will minimize costly
disputes over allocation of assets to be distributed and it will
also facilitate the compromise reached among the Debtors, the
Committee, the Prepetition Agent, the DIP Agent, the Secured
Creditors and the DIP Lenders as embodied in paragraph 45 of the
Final DIP Order.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Feb. 8, 2019 is available
at https://is.gd/RsPYh7 from Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

              About Neighbors Legacy Holdings

Neighbors Legacy Holdings -- http://www.neighborshealth.com/-- and
its subsidiaries currently operate 22 freestanding emergency
centers throughout the State of Texas, including in the greater
Houston area, South Texas, El Paso, the Golden Triangle, the
Panhandle, and the Permian B sin. The Emergency Centers are
designed to offer an attractive alternative to traditional hospital
emergency rooms by reducing wait times, providing better working
conditions for physicians and staff, and giving patient care the
highest possible priority. The Debtors were founded in Houston in
2008 by nine emergency room physicians.

EDMG, LLC, Neighbors Legacy Holdings and several affiliates sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.
Tex. Lead Case No. 18-33836) on July 12, 2018.  In the petition
signed by Chad J. Shandler, its chief restructuring officer, the
Debtor disclosed less than $50,000 in assets and less than $50,000
in liabilities.  Shandler is with CohnReznick LLP.

Judge Marvin Isgur presides over the cases.  John F Higgins, IV,
Esq., at Porter Hedges LLP, serves as counsel to the Debtors.  They
hired Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc., as investment bankers.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on July 23, 2018.  The committee has hired Cole
Schotz P.C. as its legal counsel.


NFE ATLANTIC: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR & Rates Sec. Term Loan B2
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned first time ratings to NFE
Atlantic Holdings LLC (NFEAH), including a B2 Corporate Family
Rating (CFR) and B2-PD Probability of Default Rating. Moody's
assigned B2 ratings to the proposed senior secured guaranteed term
loan and to senior secured guaranteed revolver facility issued by
the company. Moody's also assigned a SGL-3 Speculative Grade
Liquidity Rating. The outlook on all ratings is stable.

NFEAH is an indirect subsidiary of the privately held New Fortress
Energy Holdings LLC as well as New Fortress Energy LLC (NFE), which
was founded in 2014 and completed its initial public offering in
February 2019. The company is developing into a profitable niche
player in the growing US LNG export market. Its unique business
model is underpinned by the existing and planned investment in the
downstream LNG infrastructure, including LNG terminals and
facilities, as well as by long-term LNG supply contracts across the
Caribbean. The company is in the process of building a small scale
inland LNG facility and transportation infrastructure in the US.
During the build out period in 2019-2021, it will meet the
contracted commitments by sourcing LNG on the market.

Assignments:

Issuer: NFE Atlantic Holdings LLC

  - Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B2-PD

  - Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Assigned SGL-3

  - Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B2

  - Gtd. Senior Secured Term Loan, Assigned B2 (LGD3)

  - Gtd. Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, Assigned B2
(LGD3)

Outlook:

Issuer: NFE Atlantic Holdings LLC

  - Outlook assigned Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B2 CFR reflects NFEAH's limited exposure to volume and
commodity price risks in 2019-2020, as the company benefits from
high share of contracted revenue and earnings under long-term LNG
sales agreements with a number of utilities and private
counterparties in the Caribbean and in the US. The projected ramp
up in EBITDA in 2019-2020 reflects relatively high selling prices
and solid cash margins, secured by the company, as well as a high
level of take-or-pay and minimum volume commitments embedded in the
signed contracts.

The B2 CFR also factors in a high level of execution risk, both on
the timely construction of LNG terminals and other downstream
infrastructure in Jamaica, Puerto Rico and Mexico in 2019, and on
the greenfield project to build the LNG facility in the US in
2019-2021. These risks are in part mitigated via construction
contracts, including the turn-key contract to build the LNG
facility. The B2 CFR assumes that the new LNG facility and all
necessary infrastructure in the US, Jamaica, Puerto Rico and Mexico
will be built on time and on budget, with no additional funding
requirements in 2019-2020.

The B2 CFR anticipates a high pace of growth in operations, as the
company scales up LNG sales and takes up new commitments to invest
in downstream infrastructure. The CFR assumes that the management
team will continue to manage growth and investment commitments in
step with the improvement in earnings and will therefore deliver on
the expectation of a rapid deleveraging. The group's initial
leverage will be very high with Debt/EBITDA around 14x in 2019 and
should decline significantly in 2020 to below 4x on the back of
increasing cash flow from rising utilization of LNG terminals.

NFEAH maintains adequate liquidity, reflected in its SGL-3
speculative grade liquidity rating. During the 2019-2020 building
phase, NFE Atlantic Holdings's operations, financial profile and
ability to service debt, as well as its liquidity position, will be
underpinned by $750 million raised from a term loan B and about
$300 million in equity that the group raised in the initial public
offering. The company will also benefit from $100 million revolver
facility, which will be available shortly after the closing of the
term loan and is expected to be fully undrawn upon its closing. B2
CFR assumes that NFEAH will maintain a sizable cash balance in
2019-2020, comprising all net proceeds from the placement of
capital, that will also support its debt service commitments during
this time.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the group will
deliver new facilities in Puerto Rico by mid-2019 and Mexico by the
end of 2019 paving the way for accelerated deleveraging in 2020.

An upgrade of the rating will require good visibility for the
timely completion of the LNG project in the US and a track-record
of successful operation of the group's LNG value chain in the US
and the Caribbean, with growth in earnings and decline in leverage
to below 4x debt/EBITDA and EBITDA/Interest maintained above 4x.

The rating may be downgraded as a result of a slower than expected
ramp up in LNG delivery volumes in Jamaica and Puerto Rico through
2019 or a revision of the existing contractual arrangements leading
to a significant erosion of the group's margins or lower minimum
volumes and take-or-pay commitments by the customers; delayed
construction of the LNG facility in the US or LNG infrastructure;
or a significant cost overrun on any of the projects leading to
weaker liquidity or additional funding requirements. A downgrade of
Jamaica's B3 positive sovereign rating, or a worsening of Puerto
Rico's prospects of emergence from bankruptcy could also lead to
the downgrade of the company's rating.

The senior secured term loan and revolving facility are rated B2 in
accordance with the application of Moody's Loss Given Default
methodology. The loans will benefit from the upstream guarantees
provided by the operating subsidiaries of the company and by the
downstream guarantee provided by NFE.

New Fortress Energy Atlantic Holdings LLC is an energy company
developing a new LNG business model. In 2017, the company reported
total assets of $381 million and generated negative EBITDA of $
21.5 million.


NHSC DINING: Seeks to Hire Robert O Lampl as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
NHSC Dining Venture, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to hire Robert O
Lampl Law Office as its legal counsel.

The firm will assist the Debtor in the administration of its
bankruptcy estate; review reports for legal sufficiency; represent
the Debtor in adversary proceedings; and provide other legal
services in connection with its Chapter 11 case.

Lampl Law Office charges these hourly fees:

         Robert Lampl     $450  
         John Lacher      $400    
         David Fuchs      $375
         Ryan Cooney      $300
         Sy Lampl         $250
         Paralegal        $150

The firm's attorneys do not represent any interest adverse to the
Debtor, according to court filings.

Lampl Law Office can be reached through:

     Robert O Lampl, Esq.
     John P. Lacher, Esq.
     David L. Fuchs, Esq.
     Ryan J. Cooney, Esq.
     Sy O. Lampl, Esq.
     223 Fourth Avenue, 4th Floor
     Pittsburgh, PA 15222        
     Phone: (412) 392-0330
     Facsimile: (412) 392-0335
     Email: rlampl@lampllaw.com

                   About NHSC Dining Venture

NHSC Dining Venture, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 19-20521) on Feb. 8,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $1 million and liabilities of less than $1 million.  The
case is assigned to Judge Gregory L. Taddonio.


NOVUM PHARMA: Seeks to Hire Cole Schotz as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Novum Pharma, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware to hire Cole Schotz P.C. as its legal
counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; represent the Debtor in negotiation with its
creditors; assist in any potential sale of its assets; and provide
other legal services in connection with its Chapter 11 case.

The firm will charge these hourly fees:

     Members/Special Counsel          $405 - $950
     Associates                       $275 - $510
     Paralegals                       $205 - $310
     Litigation Support Specialists   $305 - $405

The attorneys and paralegal who will be providing the services
are:

     David Hurst           Member        $690  
     Patrick Reilley       Member        $595
     Jacob Frumkin         Associate     $460
     Pauline Ratkowiak     Paralegal     $295

Cole Schotz received a retainer in the amount of $200,000.

David Hurst, Esq., at Cole Schotz, disclosed in a court filing that
his firm is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     David R. Hurst, Esq.
     Patrick J. Reilley, Esq.
     Cole Schotz P.C.
     500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1410
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Telephone: (302) 652-3131
     Facsimile: (302) 652-3117
     Email: dhurst@coleschotz.com
     Email: preilley@coleschotz.com

        – and –

     Jacob S. Frumkin, Esq.  
     Cole Schotz P.C.
     25 Main Street
     Hackensack, NJ 07601
     Telephone: (201) 489-3000
     Facsimile: (201) 489-3479
     Email: jfrumkin@coleschotz.com

                         About Novum Pharma

Founded in 2015, Novum Pharma, LLC -- http://www.novumrx.com/-- is
a global specialty pharmaceutical company which owns a portfolio of
topical dermatology products that it purchased from Primus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in March 2015.  The dermatology products are
marketed under the names Alcortin, Alcortin A, Quinja (formerly
Aloquin) and Novacort.  Each product is a fungicidal gel used to
treat a variety of skin conditions.

Novum Pharma sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
19-10209) on Feb. 3, 2019.

Novum Pharma estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $50
million to $100 million in liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Debtor tapped Cole Schotz P.C. as general bankruptcy counsel;
CR3 Partners, LLC, as financial advisor; Teneo Capital LLC as
investment banker; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims
and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Feb. 12, 2019.


NOVUM PHARMA: Seeks to Hire CR3 Partners, Appoint CRO
-----------------------------------------------------
Novum Pharma, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Delaware to hire CR3 Partners, LLC and appoint
Thomas O'Donoghue Jr. as chief restructuring officer.

Mr. O'Donoghue, a partner at CR3, will oversee the implementation
of the Debtor's business plan; oversee the preparation of financial
information for distribution to creditors and the analysis of
creditor claims; evaluate and implement strategic alternatives to
maximize the value of the Debtor's assets; assist in the
formulation of a bankruptcy plan; assist in negotiations; and
provide other services in connection with the Debtor's Chapter 11
case.

Mr. O'Donoghue will charge an hourly fee of $600.  To the extent he
is supported by other CR3 professionals, they will be paid at
standard billing rates of $300 to $450 per hour.

The firm received a $75,000 cash retainer.

Mr. O'Donoghue disclosed in a court filing that his firm does not
have any interest adverse to the interest of the Debtor's
bankruptcy estate, creditors and equity security holders.

CR3 can be reached through:

     Thomas S. O'Donoghue, Jr.
     CR3 Partners, LLC
     13355 Noel Road, Suite 310
     Dallas, TX 75240
     Phone: +1 (847) 778-3965
     Email: tom.odonoghue@cr3partners.com

                         About Novum Pharma

Founded in 2015, Novum Pharma, LLC -- http://www.novumrx.com/-- is
a global specialty pharmaceutical company which owns a portfolio of
topical dermatology products that it purchased from Primus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in March 2015.  The dermatology products are
marketed under the names Alcortin, Alcortin A, Quinja (formerly
Aloquin) and Novacort.  Each product is a fungicidal gel used to
treat a variety of skin conditions.

Novum Pharma sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
19-10209) on Feb. 3, 2019.

Novum Pharma estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $50
million to $100 million in liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Debtor tapped Cole Schotz P.C. as general bankruptcy counsel;
CR3 Partners, LLC, as financial advisor; Teneo Capital LLC as
investment banker; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims
and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Feb. 12, 2019.


NOVUM PHARMA: Seeks to Hire Kurtzman as Administrative Agent
------------------------------------------------------------
Novum Pharma, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware to hire Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as
its administrative agent.

The firm will provide bankruptcy administrative services, which
include the solicitation, balloting and tabulation of votes in
connection with any Chapter 11 plan proposed; preparation of
reports in support of the plan; managing any distribution pursuant
to the plan; and assisting the Debtor in reconciling claims.

Prior to its bankruptcy filing, the Debtor provided the firm with a
retainer in the amount of $25,000.

Evan Gershbein, senior vice president of Kurtzman's Corporate
Restructuring Services, disclosed in a court filing that the firm
is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Evan Gershbein
     Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC
     2335 Alaska Avenue
     El Segundo, CA 90245
     Telephone: (310) 823-9000

                         About Novum Pharma

Founded in 2015, Novum Pharma, LLC -- http://www.novumrx.com/-- is
a global specialty pharmaceutical company which owns a portfolio of
topical dermatology products that it purchased from Primus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in March 2015.  The dermatology products are
marketed under the names Alcortin, Alcortin A, Quinja (formerly
Aloquin) and Novacort.  Each product is a fungicidal gel used to
treat a variety of skin conditions.

Novum Pharma sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
19-10209) on Feb. 3, 2019.

Novum Pharma estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $50
million to $100 million in liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Debtor tapped Cole Schotz P.C. as general bankruptcy counsel;
CR3 Partners, LLC, as financial advisor; Teneo Capital LLC as
investment banker; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims
and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Feb. 12, 2019.


NOVUM PHARMA: Seeks to Hire Teneo Capital as Investment Banker
--------------------------------------------------------------
Novum Pharma, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Delaware to hire Teneo Capital LLC.

The firm will serve as investment banker in connection with the
sale of substantially all of the Debtor's assets.  The services to
be provided by the firm include assisting the Debtor in the review
and negotiation of any proposed transaction; evaluating proposals
from potential buyers; and provide other services to consummate the
transaction.

Teneo will be paid a monthly fee of $20,000.  In the event a
restructuring or sale transaction is consummated, the Debtor will
pay the firm a fee equal to the greater of 5% of the "enterprise
value" of the transaction or $150,000.  

If, whether in connection with the consummation of a restructuring
or otherwise, the Debtor consummates a financing, Teneo will be
paid a financing fee to be mutually agreed by the parties.  If a
debtor-in-possession financing is provided by an affiliate or
insider of the Debtor, Teneo will not be entitled to a financing
fee unless the firm is materially involved in the consummation of
such transaction.

In the event the transaction consummated is a "363 sale," Teneo
agrees that the applicable fee should be a sale transaction fee and
that a restructuring fee should not be separately due.

Within 90 days prior to the Debtor's bankruptcy filing, Teneo
received a $20,000 retainer, which will be credited first against
any expenses incurred by the firm, and then against any unpaid
monthly fees.

Charles Boguslaski, senior managing director of Teneo, disclosed in
a court filing that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in
section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Teneo can be reached through:

     Charles Boguslaski
     Teneo Capital LLC   
     280 Park Avenue, 4th Floor
     New York, NY 10017
     Phone: +1 (212) 886 1600
     Email: info@teneo.com

                         About Novum Pharma

Founded in 2015, Novum Pharma, LLC -- http://www.novumrx.com/-- is
a global specialty pharmaceutical company which owns a portfolio of
topical dermatology products that it purchased from Primus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in March 2015.  The dermatology products are
marketed under the names Alcortin, Alcortin A, Quinja (formerly
Aloquin) and Novacort.  Each product is a fungicidal gel used to
treat a variety of skin conditions.

Novum Pharma sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
19-10209) on Feb. 3, 2019.

Novum Pharma estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $50
million to $100 million in liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Debtor tapped Cole Schotz P.C. as general bankruptcy counsel;
CR3 Partners, LLC, as financial advisor; Teneo Capital LLC as
investment banker; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims
and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Feb. 12, 2019.


OMNIL CORPORATION: Seeks to Hire Boyer Terry as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Omnil Corporation seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Georgia to employ Boyer Terry LLC as
counsel to the Debtor.

Omnil Corporation requires Boyer Terry to:

   a. give the Debtor legal advice with respect to the powers and
      duties of Debtor-in-Possession in the continued operation
      of the business and management of the Debtor's property;

   b. prepare on behalf of the Debtor, as Debtor-in-Possession,
      necessary applications, motions, answers, reports, and
      other legal papers;

   c. continue existing litigation, to which the Debtor-in-
      Possession may be a party and conduct examinations
      incidental to the administration of their estates;

   d. take any and all necessary action necessary to the proper
      preservation and administration of the Debtor's estate;

   e. assist the Debtor-in-Possession with the preparation and
      filing of the Statement of Financial Affairs and schedules
      and lists as are appropriate;

   f. take whatever action is necessary with reference to the use
      by the Debtor of its property pledged as collateral, to
      preserve the same for the benefit of the Debtor and secured
      creditors in accordance with the requirements of the
      Bankruptcy Code;

   g. assert all claims the Debtor have against the third
      parties;

   h. assist the Debtor in connection with claims for taxes made
      by governmental units; and

   i. perform all other legal services for the Debtor as Debtor-
      in-Possession that may be necessary.

Boyer Terry will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys               $300 to $340
     Paralegals                $100

Boyer Terry will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Christopher W. Terry, a partner at Boyer Terry, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Boyer Terry can be reached at:

     Christopher W. Terry, Esq.
     BOYER TERRY LLC
     348 Cotton Avenue, Suite 200
     Macon, GA 31201
     Tel: (478) 742-6481
     Fax: (770) 200-9320
     E-mail: chris@boyerterry.com

                   About Omnil Corporation

OMNIL Corporation, d/b/a M & M Food Mart, operates a frozen food
retail store in Leesburg, Georgia.  OMNIL filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 19-10117) on Jan. 31, 2019.  In
the petition signed by Nita B. Patel, president, the Debtor
estimated $100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  Christopher W. Terry, Esq., at Boyer Terry
LLC, serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.



PAYLESS INC: Moody's Lowers PDR to 'D-PD' Amid Bankruptcy Filing
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Payless Inc. (New)'s
Probability of Default Rating (PDR) to D-PD from Ca-PD.
Concurrently, Moody's affirmed the company's Corporate Family
Rating (CFR) at Ca, affirmed its $80 million A-1 senior secured
term loan due 2022 at Ca (first-out relative to the A-2 term loan),
and affirmed its $200 million A-2 senior secured term loan due 2022
at C, which reflects Moody's expectation for recovery on the
respective debt instruments. The downgrade of the PDR follows
Payless' announcement that it has filed for voluntary Chapter 11
bankruptcy in the U.S. on February 18, 2019. Payless Canadian
subsidiaries ("Payless Canada") will also be seeking protection
pursuant to the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (the "CCAA")
in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. The ratings outlook has
been changed to stable from negative.

Subsequent to its actions, Moody's will withdraw all of Payless'
ratings due to its bankruptcy filing.

The following ratings for Payless Inc. (New) were downgraded and
will be withdrawn:

  - Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to D-PD from Ca-PD

The following ratings for Payless Inc. (New) were affirmed and will
be withdrawn:

  - Corporate Family Rating, Ca

  - $80 Million Senior Secured Tranche A-1 Term Loan due 2022, Ca
(LGD4)

  - $200 Million Senior Secured Tranche A-2 Term Loan due 2022, C
(LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Payless Inc. (New)

  - Outlook, Changed To Stable from Negative and will be withdrawn

RATINGS RATIONALE

In the application of Moody's Loss Given Default Methodology, the
family recovery rate was maintained at 35%, signaling what Moody's
believes is the current valuation of the company. The Senior
Secured Tranche A-1 term loan rating was affirmed at Ca, with an
expected loss rate of greater than 35%, while the Senior Secured
Tranche A-2 term loan rating was affirmed at C, with an expected
loss rate of greater than 65%.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail Industry
published in May 2018.

Headquartered in Topeka, Kansas, Payless Inc. (New) is a specialty
retailer that operates nearly 3,500 family footwear stores in over
40 countries. The company emerged from bankruptcy in August 2017
and is now owned and controlled by prior lenders, which includes
private equity owners and hedge funds. The company is private and
does not publicly disclose its financials. Payless generated annual
net sales of roughly $1.7 billion.


PERNIX SLEEP: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: Pernix Sleep, Inc.
             10 North Park Place, Suite 201
             Morristown, NJ 07960

Business Description: Pernix -- http://www.pernixtx.com-- is a
                      specialty pharmaceutical company focused on
                      identifying, developing and commercializing
                      prescription drugs, primarily for the United

                      States market, currently focused on the
                      therapeutic areas of pain and neurology.
                      Primarily, the Debtors sell three core
                      branded products: Zohydro ER with BeadTek,
                      Silenor, and Treximet.  Pernix is
                      headquartered in Morristown, New Jersey.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 18, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Delaware (Delaware)

Fourteen affiliates that simultaneously filed voluntary petitions
seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

    Debtor                                         Case No.
    ------                                         --------
    Pernix Sleep, Inc. (Lead Case)                 19-10323
    Pernix Therapeutics Holdings, Inc.             19-10324
    Pernix Ireland Limited                         19-10325
    Pernix Holdco 3, LLC                           19-10326
    Penix Ireland Pain Designated Activity Company 19-10327
    Pernix Manufacturing, LLC                      19-10328
    Pernix Therapeutics, LLC                       19-10329
    Cypress Pharmaceuticals, Inc                   19-10330
    Pernix Holdco 1, LLC                           19-10331
    Pernix Holdco 2, LLC                           19-10332
    Respicopea, Inc.                               19-10333
    Macoven Pharmaceuticals, L.L.C.                19-10334
    Gaine, Inc.                                    19-10335
    Hawthorn Pharmaceuticals, Inc.                 19-10336

Judge: Hon. Christopher S. Sontch

Debtors'
Delaware
Bankruptcy
Counsel:                  Adam G. Landis, Esq.
                          Kerri K. Mumford, Esq.
                          Jennifer L. Cree, Esq.
                          Nicholas E. Jenner, Esq.
                          LANDIS RATH & COBB LLP
                          919 Market Street, Suite 1800
                          Wilmington, Delaware 19801
                          Tel: (302) 467-4400
                          Fax: (302) 467-4450
                          Email: landis@lrclaw.com
                                 mumford@lrclaw.com
                                 cree@lrclaw.com
                                 jenner@lrclaw.com

Debtors'
Bankruptcy
Counsel:                  Marshall S. Huebner, Esq.
                          Eli J. Vonnegut, Esq.
                          Christopher S. Robertson, Esq.
                          Douglas R. Keeton, Esq.
                          DAVIS POLK & WARDELL LLP
                          450 Lexington Avenue
                          New York, New York 10017
                          Tel: (212) 450-4000
                          Fax: (212) 701-5800
                          Email:marshall.huebner@davispolk.com
                                eli.vonnegut@davispolk.com
                                christopher.robertson@davispol.com
                                douglas.keeton@davispolk.com

Debtors'
Investment
Banker:                   GUGGENHEIM PARTNERS, LLC

Debtors'
Financial
Advisor:                  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Debtors'
Notice &
Claims Agent:             PRIME CLERK LLC
                          https://cases.primeclerk.com/pernix

Pernix Therapeutics Holdings'
Total Assets as of Sept. 30, 2018: $274,770,000

Pernix Therapeutics Holdings'
Total Debts as of Sept. 30, 2018: $447,052,000

The petition was signed by John A. Sedor, chief executive officer
and chairman of the Board of Directors of Pemix Therapeutics
Holdings, Inc.

A full-text copy of  Pernix Sleep's petition is available for free
at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb19-10323.pdf

Consolidated List of Debtors' 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
Wilmington Trust,                  Indenture           $78,225,000
National Association               Trustee to 4.25%
50 South Sixth Street              Convertible Senior
Suite 1290                         Notes Due 2021
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Alexandre de Rothschild
Tel: 612-217-5650
Fax: 612-217-5651
Email: aderothschild@wilmingtontrust.com

Wilmington Trust,                  Indenture           $35,743,000
National Association               Trustee to
50 South Sixth Street              4.25%/5.25%
Suite 1290                         Exchangeable
Minneapolis, MN 55402              Senior Notes
Quinton M. DePompolo
Tel: 612-217-5670
Fax: 612-217-5651
Email: qdepompolo@wilmingtontrust.com

Caremark                            MCO (Part D)        $3,394,439
2211 Sanders Rd
Northbrook, IL 60062
Attn: Senior Vice President
Trade Relations
Fax: (847) 559-3428

Palmetto GBA - TPA Operations       Coverage Gap        $2,024,874
17 Technology Cir
Columbia, SC 29203-9591
Attn: General Counsel
Tel: 1-877-534-2772 x1
Email: tpaoperations@tpaadministrator.com

Civil Medicaid Fraud Division        Settlement         $2,000,000
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711-2548
Attn: Office of the Attorney General
Tel: (512) 475-2994

GlaxoSmithKline LLC                  Settlement         $2,000,000
5 Crescent Drive
Philadelphia, PA 19112
Attn: General Counsel
Email:marilyn.r.orndorff@gsk.com

McKesson Corporation                  Wholesaler        $1,954,634
6555 State Highway 161
Irving, TX 75037
Mark Miller, VP, Procurement
Services McKesson
Tel: (972) 446-4202
Email: Mark.Miller@McKesson.com

Cardinal Health                       Wholesaler        $1,846,123
7000 State Highway 161
Irving, TX 75037
Attn: General Counsel
Fax: 614-652-7325
Email: chieflegalofficer@cardinalhealth.com

Caremark                                  MCO           $1,303,176
2211 Sanders Rd
Northbroo, IL 60062
Attn: Senior Vice President
Trade Relations
Fax: (847) 559-3428

Medicine To Go Pharmacies, Inc.       Settlement        $1,152,500
c/o Heffler Claims Group
1515 Market St. Ste 1700
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Stem Thomasson LLP
Tel: (973) 379-7500
Email: andrew@sternthomasson.com

Quick Care Pharmacy Inc.         Prescription Direct    $1,068,731
130 Crossways Park Drive
Suite 101
Woodbury, NY 11797
Attn: CFO
Email: mfang@quickcarepharmacy.com

Defense Health Agency
Tricare Mgmt Activity                   TriCare         $1,005,263
16401 E. Centretech Parkway
Aurora, CO 80011-9066
Attn: General Counsel, Contract
Resource Management (CRM)
UFVARR_Requests@mail.mil

AmerisourceBergen Drug                 Wholesaler         $850,800
Corporation
1300 Morris Drive
Chesterbrook PA 19087
Attn: General Counsel
Email: Ewinderman@amerisourcebergen.com

OptumRx, Inc.                             MCO             $814,092
17900 Von Karman Avenue
MIS CAO16-0202
Irvine, CA 92614
Attn: S.V.P. Industry and
Network Relations
Fax: (949) 988-6085

RelayHealth                       Coupon Adjudicator      $750,954
1564 N.E. Expressway
Atlanta, GA 30329
Marina Cantoni Engler
Tel: 412-474-1110
Email: marina.cantoni@mckesson.com

Cigna HealthCare                     MCO (Part D)         $685,220
900 Cottage Grove Road, 85PHR
Hartford, CT 06152
Attn: Alex G. Krikorian R.Ph. M.8.A.
Vice President, Pharmaceutial
Contracting
Email: lisa.murray@cigna.com

Prime Therapeutics LLC                   MCO              $653,047
1305 Corporate Center Drive
Eagan, MN 55121
Attn: Vice President
Pharmaceutical Trade Relations
Email: patrick.mccaw@primetherapeutics.com

Prime Therapeutics LLC                MCO (Part D)        $652,786
2900 Ames Crossing Road
Eagan, MN 55121
Attn: Vice President
Pharmaceutical Trade Relations
Email: patrick.mccaw@primetherapeutics.com

Recro Gainesville LLC              Royalty/Inventory      $572,537
1300 Gould Drive
Gainesville, GA 30504
Attn: General Counsel
Email: Joseph.Musciotto@recocdmo.com

Source Healthcare Analytics, LLC       Trade Debt         $489,685
Symphony Health Solutions Corporation
2390 E. Camelback Road
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Attn: Legal Department
Email: legal@Symphonyhealth.com

Express Scripts, Inc.                     MCO             $407,825
One Express Way
St. Louis, MO 63121
Attn: F. Everett Neville
Chief Trade Relations Officer
Fax: 800-964-1888

Venable LLP                           Trade Debt          $388,235
1290 Ave of Americas, 20th Fl.
New York, NY 10104
Attn: General Counsel
Email: dconde@venable.com

ProCom One                             Royalty            $368,620
100 E. San Antonio
Suite 201 San Marcos, TX 78666
Attn: General Counsel
Email: neilbkv@gmail.com

Cigna HealthCare                         MCO              $353,882
900 Cottage Grove Road, BSPHR
Hartford, CT 06152
Kerri Miller, PharmD
Vice President, Pharmaceutical
Contracting
Email: kerri.miller@cigna.com

Integrated Commercialization         Third Party          $351,504
Solutions, Inc.                       Logistics
3101 Gaylord Parkway
Frisco, TX 75034
Therese Brooks
Tel: 469-365-7639
Email: Theresa.Brooks@icsconnect.com

MarketShareMovers                Coupon Adjudicator       $263,546
2325 Heritage Center Drive
Suite 317
Furlong, PA 18925
Attn: President
Email: Shari.Wales@marketsharemovers.com

CPPIB Credit Investments              Royalty             $250,690
6C Rue Gabriel Lippman
L-5365 Munsbach
Luxembourgh
Attn: General Counsel
Email: cppibipinvestments@cppib.com

Walgreen Co.                        GPO Rebate            $231,894
300 Wilmot Rd.
1st Floor MS, 3240
Deerfield, IL 60015
Attn: General Counsel
Email: RxARInquiry@walgreens.com

Sheffield Pharmaceuticals LLC       Inventory             $211,324
170 Broad Street
New London, CT
06320-5313
Bill Mencer, Controller
Tel: 860-442-4451 x2216
Email: Bill.Mencer@sheffieldpharma.com

Nalpropion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.   Non-Debtor JV                $0
9171 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 270  Related party
San Diego, CA 92122-1267
Kris Hanson, General Counsel
Email: khanson@nalpropion.com


PUMAS CAB: Unsecured Creditors to Get 9.1% in One Lump Sum Payment
------------------------------------------------------------------
Pumas Cab Corp. filed a second amended disclosure statement to
amend the treatment of general unsecured claims.

Class III, consisting of claims of general unsecured creditor in
the Debtors' case, total approximately $1,227.32.  The Plan offers
the general unsecured creditors a distribution of 9.1% of the total
amount of unsecured debt in one lump sum payment.

Class II - (Secured Claim).  This class shall consist of the
original secured claim of the creditor, Melrose Credit Union, in
the amount of $1,313,838.48. This class is impaired as the Debtor
proposes to surrender the collateral, whereas the deficiency amount
will be offset by the surrender and the subsequent sale of the taxi
medallions.

Class II - (Unsecured Claims).  Class II consists of the claim of
Melrose Credit Union for  the deficiency totaling approximately
$913 838.48.

The parties have reached a Settlement Agreement whereby, upon
surrender of the  medallions, the Debtor will pay $262,500.00 in a
lump sum payment, within 30 days of the entry of  an order
approving the settlement agreement, in full settlement of the
remaining deficiency.

The Debtors propose to pay to New York State Department of Taxation
& Finance for the unsecured non priority portion of their claim, a
distribution of 9.1%, $111.69 in one lump sum payment on the
Effective date of the Plan.

The Plan will be financed from contributions from the personal
funds of each of the two loans guarantors. The Debtor provided to
Melrose Credit Union detailed individual financial statements for
each guarantor of the loan.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement dated
February 6, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yxonrgrc from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                   About Pumas Cab Corp.

Pumas Cab Corp. is a small business debtor as defined in 11 U.S.C.
Section 101(51D) under the taxi and limousine service industry.  It
is an affiliate of Quizphi Cab Corp., which sought bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-44085) on Aug. 7, 2017.

Pumas Cab Corp., based in Astoria, New York, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-44151) on Aug. 10, 2017.  In
the petition signed by Nelly Lucero, secretary, the Debtor
disclosed $12,415 in assets and $2.64 million in liabilities.  The
Hon. Carla E. Craig presides over the Pumas Cab case.


PURE ACQUISITION: WithumSmith+Brown PC Raises Going Concern Doubt
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Pure Acquisition Corp. filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its annual report on Form 10-K, disclosing a net income
(attributable to common shares) of $4,275,271 on $0 of total
revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss
(attributable to common shares) of $5,881 on $0 of total revenue
for the period Nov. 13, 2017 (Inception) to Dec. 31, 2017.

The audit report of WithumSmith+Brown, PC states that if the
Company is unable to complete a Business Combination by the close
of business on October 16, 2019, then the Company will cease all
operations except for the purpose of liquidating.  This date for
mandatory liquidation and subsequent dissolution raises substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2018, showed total assets
of $419,465,434, total liabilities of $397,626, and a total
stockholders' equity of $5,067,808.

A copy of the Form 10-K is available at:

                       https://is.gd/cAD4ng

Pure Acquisition Corp. does not have significant operations.  The
Company intends to focus on effecting a merger, share exchange,
asset acquisition, stock purchase, recapitalization,
reorganization, or similar business combination with one or more
target businesses. The Company was founded in 2017 and is based in
Fort Worth, Texas.



REDEEMED CHR. CHURCH: Plan Outline Hearing Set for April 8
----------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Wendelin I. Lipp will convene a hearing on April
8, 2019 at 10:30 a.m. to consider approval of Redeemed Chr. Church
of God Rvr. Of Life's disclosure statement in connection with its
chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

March 18, 2019, is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the Disclosure Statement.

                 About Redeemed Chr. Church

Headquartered in Riverdale, Maryland, Redeemed Chr. Church of God
Rvr. Of Life dba The Redeemed Christian Church of God is a
tax-exempt religious entity (as described in 26 U.S.C. Section
501).

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Md. Case No. 18-12290) on Feb. 22, 2018, estimating its assets at
up to $50,000 and its liabilities at between $1 million and $10
million.  The petition was signed by Pastor Oluwagbemiga Adekunle,
director.

Judge Wendelin I. Lipp presides over the case.

Steven H. Greenfeld, Esq., at Cohen, Baldinger & Greenfeld, LLC,
serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


RFS SPORTS: Seeks Approval to Hire PFS as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------
RFS Sports, Inc. seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of California to hire PFS Accounting, LLP as
its accountant.

The firm will provide these services:

     a. provide oversight of the internal accounting systems
employed by the Debtor;

     b. prepare federal and state tax returns;

     c. prepare audited year-end financial statements;

     d. assist the Debtor and other professionals employed in the
case to prepare a plan of reorganization;

     e. assist the Debtor and its professionals in preparing and
reviewing financial projections;

     f. assist the Debtor in complying with the Operational
Guidelines and Reporting Requirements promulgated by the Office of
the U.S. Trustee; and

     g. provide additional financial analysis, projections, and
other accounting and tax services if required.

The hourly billing rates of PFS are:

     Partners              $275 - $315
     Accounting Managers          $175
     Tax Supervisor               $175
     Tax Professional             $125
     Accounting Supervisor        $100
     Bookkeeper                    $75

Derrick Snyder, a certified public accountant employed with PFS,
disclosed in a court filing that the firm's professionals neither
hold nor represent any interest adverse to the Debtor's estate.

PFS can be reached through:

     Derrick K. Snyder
     PFS Accounting, LLP
     556 N. Diamond Bar Blvd, Suite 101
     Diamond Bar, CA 91765
     Office: 909.294.7372
     Fax: 888.729.9947
     E-mail: Info@pfsaccounting.com

                       About RFS Sports Inc.

RFS Sports, Inc. is a privately held company in Ontario, California
that manufactures and supplies sports equipment.  The company filed
its Articles of Incorporation in the State of California on Aug.
27, 2013.

RFS Sports filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
19-10456) on January 18, 2019. In the petition signed by Yongming
Sui, CEO, the Debtor estimated $352,490 in total assets and
$13,399,012 in total liabilities.

The case has been assigned to Judge Mark S. Wallace.  Javier H.
Castillo, Esq. at Castillo Law Firm is the Debtor's counsel.


S FRANKLIN: Seeks to Hire Purcell, Krug & Haller as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S Franklin LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Middle District of Pennsylvania to employ Purcell, Krug &
Haller as its legal counsel.

The Debtor requires the firm to:

     a. give legal advice regarding its powers and duties in the
continued operation of its business and management of its
property;

     b. represent the Debtor in any matters involving contest with
secured or unsecured creditors;

     c. negotiate and prepare a plan of reorganization; and

     e. provide other legal services in connection with the
Debtor's Chapter 11 case.

The firm's lawyers and paralegals who will work on the Debtor's
case and their hourly rates are:

     Lisa A. Rynard                     $300
     Leon P. Haller                     $300
     Paralegal                          $110

The firm will also receive reimbursement for work-related
expenses.

Lisa Rynard, Esq., an associate of Purcell, Krug & Haller, assured
the court that her firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Lisa A. Rynard, Esq.
     Purcell, Krug & Haller
     1719 North Front Street
     Harrisburg, PA 17102
     Tel: (717) 234-4178
     Email: lrynard@pkh.com

                       About S Franklin LLC

S Franklin LLC is the owner and lessor of two parcels of
residential real estate located at 196 Lakeside Drive Harveys Lake,
Pennsylvania; and 207 New Elizabeth Street, Wilkes-Barre,
Pennsylvania.

S Franklin filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Pa.05148 Case
No. 18-05148) on December 7, 2018, listing under $1 million in both
assets and liabilities.  Lisa A. Rynard, Esq. at Purcell, Krug &
Haller, represents the Debtor as counsel.


SANFRED REALTY: Unsecureds to be Paid in Full Over Five Years
-------------------------------------------------------------
Sanfred Realty, LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Hampshire a disclosure statement describing its
chapter 11 plan of reorganization dated Feb. 8, 2019.

Since Oct. 31, 2015, the Debtor has been in the business of renting
and managing the real estate located at 455 Elm Street, Milford, NH
03055.

General unsecured creditors are classified in Class 2 under the
plan and will receive distribution of 100% of their allowed claims
to be paid in five years.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
rental proceeds presently generated.

The proposed Plan has the following risks: The rental revenue is
presently sufficient to make the necessary payment the first
mortgage secured amount and to make the monthly tax payments on the
tax lien and arrearages. Current Taxes and insurance will be paid
by the tenants/occupants of each respective unit.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://is.gd/M6sRst from Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

                   About Sanfred Realty LLC

Based in Milford, New Hampshire, Sanfred Realty LLC filed a Chapter
11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D.N.H. Case No. 19-10008) on January
3, 2019, disclosing under $1 million in assets and liabilities.
The Debtor is represented by Robert L. O'Brien, Esq.


SHOOT THE MOON: Court OK's Dennis Conner Bid to Withdraw Claim
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Terry L. Myers granted Dennis Conner's motion to
withdraw his claim in the chapter 11 case captioned IN RE: SHOOT
THE MOON, LLC, Debtor, Case No. 15-60979-11 (Bankr. D. Mont.).

On Oct. 21, 2015, Debtor Shoot the Moon, LLC filed a petition
commencing its chapter 11 case. Later that month, Jeremiah Foster
("Trustee") was conditionally appointed as chapter 11 trustee, and
thereafter appointed without condition on Nov. 5, 2015. Pursuant to
a Nov.  10, 2015 order, a Feb. 8, 2016 claim bar date was
established.

On Jan. 19, 2016, Dennis Conner timely filed a proof of claim,
asserting a non-priority, unsecured claim of $923,351.12. Conner
amended that claim on May 31, 2016, asserting the debt was in the
amount of $955,745.14 plus costs and fees.

In October 2017, Trustee filed a number of adversary proceedings.
These included one against Conner asserting preference and
fraudulent transfers claims. Conner then filed a motion in the
adversary proceeding on Feb. 22, 2018, seeking to withdraw the
reference, contending he had withdrawn his proof of claim, and
asserting his right to a jury trial before an Article III district
court.

Trustee now contends that because Rule 3006 expressly provides an
order granting a withdrawal of claim may include "such terms and
conditions as the court deems proper," it would be both proper and
appropriate here for the Court to "condition such withdrawal [of
the claim] on the retention of jurisdiction over adversary
proceeding 17-00064. By doing so this Court will be sending a
message to the Article III court that it is willing to resolve the
issues in this case if the reference is not withdrawn."

Conner rejoins that the withdrawal of claim under Rule 3006 should
be granted without any conditions. He contends Trustee suffers no
"legal prejudice" from the withdrawal, as he can still raise all
factual and legal issues during litigation of the adversary
proceeding.

Given Trustee's newly asserted lack of opposition to granting the
motion for withdrawal of the claim, the Court is not asked to
directly rule on the existence of "legal prejudice" as a
prerequisite to granting the motion. However, Trustee's request
that the Court make such withdrawal "subject to this Court's
retention of jurisdiction" certainly raises similar if not
equivalent issues.

The underlying motion to withdraw the reference has not yet been
ruled upon. However, the prospect that trial of the adversary
proceeding may be before the District Court, or that it may be
conducted as a jury trial, does not amount to "legal prejudice."

The Court will grant Conner's now-unopposed motion to withdraw his
claim. The Court will impose no conditions on that withdrawal.
Given that result, the time has come to address the motion to
withdraw reference filed in Adv. No. 17-00064. Under Mont. LBR
5011-1(b) and (c), that motion must be assigned to and decided by a
U. S. District Judge.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum of Decision dated Jan. 9, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2S5s5Vz from Leagle.com.

SHOOT THE MOON, LLC, Debtor, pro se.

JEREMIAH J FOSTER, Trustee, represented by TRENT N. BAKER --
tbaker@DMLlaw.com -- DATSOPOULOS, MACDONALD & LIND & DAVID B.
COTNER, COTNER LAW, PLLC.

OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE, U.S. Trustee, represented by BRETT R.
CAHOON, US TRUSTEES OFFICE BOISE.

UNSECURED CREDITORS, Creditor Committee, represented by MICHAEL T.
CONWAY, Shipman & Goodwin LLP, JONATHAN LAWRENCE GOLD, LECLAIRRYAN,
PC, JANICE B. GRUBIN, LECLAIRRYAN, PC & WARD E. TALEFF.

                   About Shoot The Moon

Shoot The Moon, LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D. Mont. Case No. 15-60979) on Oct. 21, 2015.  Gary S.
Deschenes, Esq., at Deschenes & Associates, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor, through approximately 19
separate entities operated 11 Chili's restaurants, 3 On the Border
restaurants, and two Moonshine Grill restaurants in the states of
Idaho, Montana, and Washington.

In a stipulation filed Oct. 26, 2015, the Debtor, the United States
Trustee and five creditors agreed that "the spirit and intent of 11
U.S.C. Sec. 1104(a)(2) w[ould] be served if the Court order[ed] the
appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee."

The Court conditionally approved the appointment of Jeremiah Foster
as Trustee on Oct. 28, 2015, and thereafter appointed Jeremiah
Foster as Trustee without condition on Nov. 5, 2015.


SKYMARK PROPERTIES SPE: Taps Wolfson Bolton as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Skymark Properties II LLC and Skymark Properties SPE LLC received
approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Michigan to hire Wolfson Bolton PLLC as their legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtors of their powers and duties under
the Bankruptcy Code; represent them in negotiations; prepare a plan
of reorganization; and provide other legal services in connection
with their Chapter 11 cases.

The firm charges these hourly fees:

     Scott Wolfson         Member         $525
     Peter Bolton          Member         $510  
     Adam Kochenderfer     Member         $435  
     Anthony Kochis        Member         $410
     Eric Zacks            Of Counsel     $450
     Thomas Kelly          Associate      $295  
     Michelle Bass         Associate      $265  
     Rachel Walton         Associate      $195  
     Stephanie Travis      Paralegal      $185

Wolfson Bolton received an initial retainer of $60,000 from Skymark
Capital Corp., an entity affiliated with the Debtors.

Scott Wolfson, Esq., at Wolfson Bolton, disclosed in a court filing
that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Scott A. Wolfson, Esq.
     Anthony J. Kochis, Esq.
     Wolfson Bolton PLLC
     3150 Livernois, Suite 275  
     Troy, MI 48083  
     Telephone: (248) 247-7105  
     Facsimile: (248) 247-7099  
     Email: swolfson@wolfsonbolton.com
     Email: akochis@wolfsonbolton.com

                     About Skymark Properties

Toronto, Ontario-based Skymark Properties SPE LLC and Southfield,
Michigan-based Skymark Properties II LLC are privately held
companies that lease real estate properties.

Skymark Properties SPE and Skymark Properties II each filed a
voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Lead Case No.
19-40248) on Jan. 8, 2019.  In the petition signed by Troy Wilson,
authorized agent, the Debtors estimated $1 million to $10 million
in both assets and liabilities.

The cases are assigned to Judge Thomas J. Tucker.

Scott A. Wolfson, Esq., and Anthony J. Kochis, Esq., at Wolfson
Bolton PLLC, represent the Debtors as legal counsel.


SQLC SENIOR LIVING: To Sell Assets to Unrelated Third-Party
-----------------------------------------------------------
SQLC Senior Living Center at Corpus Christi filed a disclosure
statement relating to its chapter 11 plan.

The proposed Plan achieves a value-maximizing liquidation that
comprehensively addresses the Debtor's debt obligations through a
sale of all or substantially all of the Debtor's Assets. As a
result of extensive negotiations with the Indenture Trustee and the
Debtor's Residents, the transactions embodied by the Plan enjoy the
support of Bondholders of the Secured Bond Claims and Holders of
the Resident Claims. Resident Claims are unimpaired under the Plan,
and are therefore conclusively deemed to accept the Plan, and are
not entitled to vote on the Plan. The Debtor believes that the Plan
provides the means for maximizing recovery for those Holders of
Claims or Interests entitled to receive a distribution under the
Plan. Perhaps most importantly, the Plan provides for the
continued, uninterrupted care of the Residents throughout the sale
process and this case.

The Debtor is selling substantially all of its assets to an
unrelated third party pursuant to Bankruptcy Court order, and the
Plan proposes to, among other things, distribute the cash proceeds
thereof and all remaining assets of the Debtor to creditors
pursuant to the priorities set forth in the Bankruptcy Code. The
execution and consummation of the Plan will be facilitated through
the establishment of Liquidating Trust to, among other things,
resolve and compromise Claims, distribute the Debtor’s remaining
assets and wind-down the Debtor’s affairs.

As a broad overview, the Plan provides for a global compromise and
settlement of all Claims, Interests, Causes of Action, and
controversies released, settled, compromised, discharged, or
otherwise resolved pursuant to the Plan.

Each Holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim in Class 4 will
receive from the Liquidating Trust on or as soon as reasonably
practicable after the Effective Date their Pro Rata share of the
sum of (a) the Gifted Amount plus the aggregate Cash from Retained
Causes of Action Proceeds, less (b) any amounts of the Gift Reserve
or the Litigation Proceeds Reserve required to satisfy the Allowed
Plan Carve Out Claims as provided in this Plan.

The Debtor will obtain all Cash required to make payments pursuant
to the Plan from the Available Cash on hand or from the Purchaser.

The Debtor contemplates the sale of the Acquired Property to a
third-party. To effect this, on the Petition Date, the Debtor Filed
the Bid Procedures and Sale Motion which seeks, inter alia, to
approve the Stalking Horse APA and to establish the Auction. In
connection with the Auction, the Debtor identified the Stalking
Horse as a potential purchaser for the Assets. If no timely
Qualifying Bid is received by the Bid Deadline, the Debtor shall
not hold an Auction and instead will request at the Sale Hearing
that the Bankruptcy Court approve the Stalking Horse APA as the
Asset Purchase Agreement and declare the Stalking Horse to be the
Purchaser. If additional Qualified Bidders are identified, at the
conclusion of the Auction, the Debtor, with the consent of the
Indenture Trustee, will seek Bankruptcy Court approval to sell the
Acquired Property pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement to the
Purchaser, Free and Clear. The Sale Order and/or the Confirmation
Order shall contain specific authority for the Debtor to comply
with the Asset Purchase Agreement.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://is.gd/YoU4Yy from Pacermonitor.com at no charge.

                About SQLC Senior Living Center

SQLC Senior Living Center at Corpus Christi, Inc., dba Mirador, is
a Texas non-profit corporation that owns and operates a 228-unit
continuing care retirement community comprised of 271,455 square
feet of developed property on approximately 17 acres of land which
opened in June 2011.  As of Jan. 1, 2019, the Company employs 183
people.  Mirador offers seniors a full continuum of care in one
centralized campus-style setting throughout the aging process.  

SQLC Senior Living Center filed for bankruptcy on February 8, 2019
(Bankr. S.D. Texas, Case No. 19-20063). The petition was signed by
Louis E. Robichaux IV, chief restructuring officer. Hon. David R.
Jones presides over the case.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor had total assets of $53 million
and total liabilities of $118 million.

Demetra L. Liggins, Esq., of Thompson & Knight LLP represents the
Debtor.  Ankura Consulting, LLC serves as restructuring advisors to
the Debtor; Larx Advisors, Inc. as financial advisors; Cushman &
Wakefield U.S., Inc. as real estate agent; and Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC, as claims & noticing agent.


TATIANA QUINTERO BAIZ: Bid to Terminate Colombian Proceeding Junked
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Laurel M. Isicoff entered an order denying Debtor
Tatiana Quintero Baiz's motion to terminate recognition of
Colombian Proceeding.

The Debtor filed the motion to terminate approximately five months
after the order for recognition was entered. The motion to
terminate seeks the following relief, all pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
section 305(a):

   a. dismissal of the Order of Recognition;

   b. a finding that the Colombian Intervention Proceeding as
initiated against the Debtor is not a "foreign proceeding" as
defined in section 101(23) of the Bankruptcy Code;

   c. a finding and conclusion that the Order of Recognition is
contrary to public policy pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 1506,
because the Debtor was not given due process since, as a
consequence of the recognition, the Debtor's real property in
Florida will be seized, resulting in the loss of the Debtor's
immigration status as a resident. This would, in turn, require the
Debtor to return to Colombia which would be a danger to the Debtor
and to her children.

Pursuant to section 305(a), the Court may dismiss a chapter 15 case
after it has been recognized if "the purposes of chapter 15 of this
title would be best served by such dismissal or suspension."
However, the motion to terminate never articulates why the purposes
of chapter 15 were not served by the recognition by the Court of
the Colombian Intervention Proceeding as a foreign non-main
proceeding.

The relief the Debtor actually appears to have sought in the Motion
to Terminate is set forth in 11 U.S.C. section 1517(d) which states
that "[T]he provisions of this subchapter do not prevent
modification or termination of recognition if it is shown that the
grounds for granting it were fully or partially lacking or have
ceased to exist, but in considering such action the court shall
give due weight to possible prejudice to parties that have relied
upon the order granting recognition." Section 1517(d) is a purely
discretionary provision. For a modification or termination to
occur, the Court must apply a two-part test. The test is
disjunctive - there must be a showing that the grounds for granting
recognition (1) were fully or partially lacking (this test looks
backwards to the time of recognition) or (2) have ceased to exist
(this test looks forward from the time of recognition).

After careful consideration, the Court holds that the Debtor never
pursued dismissal under 11 U.S.C. section 305(a); moreover, the
Debtor certainly did not provide any proof that section 305(a)
relief was appropriate. Regarding relief under section 1517(d), the
Court finds that the Debtor has not met her burden of proof to
establish that the Petition for Recognition should not have been
granted, or that there has been a change that would warrant
termination of the recognition, and thus, even having exercised its
discretion, and having considered the motion to terminate, the
Court finds that it is not appropriate to either modify or
terminate the recognition of the Debtor's foreign non-main
proceeding, or to alter, amend, or vacate the prior order of
recognition.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated Feb. 11, 2019 is
available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb17-16559-202.pdf

The case is in re: Tatiana Quintero Baiz, Case No. 17-22193-BKC-LMI
(Bankr. S.D. Fla.).


THREE BEARS 8: Seeks to Hire Yacker & Glatt as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Three Bears 8, LLC seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of New Jersey to employ legal counsel in
connection with its Chapter 11 case.

The Debtor proposes to employ Yacker Glatt, LLC and pay the firm an
hourly fee of $350 for its services.

Jay Yacker, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the case,
assures the court that he is a disinterested person under Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jay B. Yacker, Esq.
     Yacker Glatt, LLC
     235 Hudson Street
     Hoboken, NJ 07030
     Phone: (201) 420-0001
     Fax : (201)849-2090
     Email: jay@yackerglatt.com

                       About Three Bears 8 LLC

Three Bears 8 LLC filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D.N.J. Case No. 18-30266) on October 11, 2018, listing under $1
million in both assets and liabilities. Jay B. Yacker, Esq. at
Yacker Glatt represents the Debtor as counsel.


TOYS R US: Court Approves Assignment of Lease to Ollie's
--------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Keith L. Phillips overruled Market Plaza Limited
Partnership's objection to the Propco I Debtors' proposed
assumption and assignment of a lease to Ollie's Bargain Outlet.

Market Plaza claims that assignment of the Toys Lease to Ollie's is
impermissible because the Propco I Debtors cannot provide adequate
assurance of future performance as required by section 365(b)(3)
and section 365(f)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code. Market Plaza asserts
that there is an intended tenant mix at the Shopping Center that
caters to the needs of higher-income customers. According to Market
Plaza, the Toys Lease first established this tenant mix by
including lease restrictions forbidding certain types of tenants.
Market Plaza urges that while the Toys Lease is the first, and most
notable, of its tenant leases to include such restrictions,
additional use and exclusivity provisions in the leases of other
Tenants further establish the intended tenant mix and master plan
for the Shopping Center's development. It contends that an
assignment to Ollie's would contravene these use restrictions and
disrupt the tenant mix, in violation of section 365(b)(3)(D).
Market Plaza also maintains that Ollie's intended use of the
premises would breach use restrictions contained in the Toys Lease
and the leases of other Tenants, in violation of section
365(b)(3)(C).

The Propco I Debtors have responded to the Objection by pointing
out that the Toys Lease predates all the other Tenants' leases and
arguing that they cannot be bound by provisions contained in other
leases to which they did not agree. They add that there is no
language in the Toys Lease regarding an intended tenant mix and no
master agreement for the Shopping Center that would evidence one.
The Propco I Debtors maintain that Market Plaza has not established
that an intended tenant mix exists and, even if the Court were to
find that one does exists, the addition of Ollie’s as a tenant
would not disrupt it. Accordingly, the Propco I Debtors dispute the
assertion that section 365(b)(3)(C) and section 365(b)(3)(D)
prohibit the assignment. They also point out that if the assignment
is not approved, they will lose the $300,000 bid by Ollie’s for
the Toys Lease because there is no backup bidder.

After a thorough analysis, the Court finds that the Propco I
Debtors have provided adequate assurance of future performance of
the Toys Lease by Ollie's, including the adequate assurances
required under section 365(b)(3)(C) and (D) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The assignment will significantly benefit the creditors of the
Propco I Debtors. Accordingly, Market Plaza's objection to the
assignment of the Toys Lease to Ollie's is overruled and the
assignment is approved.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated Feb. 11, 2019 is
available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/vaeb18-31429-1183.pdf

                     About Toys R Us, Inc.

Toys "R" Us, Inc., was an American toy and juvenile-products
retailer founded in 1948 and headquartered in Wayne, New Jersey, in
the New York City metropolitan area.  Merchandise was sold in 880
Toys "R" Us and Babies "R" Us stores in the United States, Puerto
Rico and Guam, and in more than 780 international stores and more
than 245 licensed stores in 37 countries and jurisdictions.
Merchandise was also sold at e-commerce sites including Toysrus.com
and Babiesrus.com.

On July 21, 2005, a consortium of Bain Capital Partners LLC,
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, and Vornado Realty Trust invested $1.3
billion to complete a $6.6 billion leveraged buyout of the
company.

Toys "R" Us is a privately owned entity but still files with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as required by its debt
agreements.

The Company's consolidated balance sheet showed $6.572 billion in
assets, $7.891 billion in liabilities, and a stockholders' deficit
of $1.319 billion as of April 29, 2017.

Toys "R" Us, Inc., and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries and its
Canadian subsidiary voluntarily filed for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case No. Case No.
17-34665) on Sept. 19, 2017.  In addition, the Company's Canadian
subsidiary voluntarily commenced parallel proceedings under the
Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA") in Canada in the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice.  The Company's operations
outside of the U.S. and Canada, including its 255 licensed stores
and joint venture partnership in Asia, which are separate entities,
were not part of the Chapter 11 filing and CCAA proceedings.

Grant Thornton is the monitor appointed in the CCAA case.

Judge Keith L. Phillips presides over the Chapter 11 cases.

In the Chapter 11 cases, Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP serve as the Debtors' legal counsel.  Kutak Rock
LLP serves as co-counsel.  Toys "R" Us employed Alvarez & Marsal
North America, LLC as its restructuring advisor; and Lazard Freres
& Co. LLC as its investment banker.  It hired Prime Clerk LLC as
claims and noticing agent.  Consensus Advisory Services LLC and
Consensus Securities LLC, serve as sale process investment banker.
A&G Realty Partners, LLC, serves as its real estate advisor.

On Sept. 26, 2017, the U.S. Trustee for Region 4 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP as its legal counsel; Wolcott
Rivers, P.C., as local counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc. as financial
advisor; and Moelis & Company LLC as investment banker.

                        Toys "R" Us UK

Toys "R" Us Limited, Toys "R" Us, Inc.'s UK arm with 105 stores and
3,000 employees, was sent into administration in the United Kingdom
in February 2018.

Arron Kendall and Simon Thomas of Moorfields Advisory Limited, 88
Wood Street, London, EC2V 7QF were appointed Joint Administrators
on Feb. 28, 2018. The Administrators now manage the affairs,
business and property of the Company.  The Administrators act as
agents only and without personal liability.

The Administrators said they will make every effort to secure a
buyer for all or part of the business.

                   Liquidation of U.S. Stores

Toys "R" Us, Inc., on March 15, 2018, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court a motion seeking Bankruptcy Court approval to
start the process of conducting an orderly wind-down of its U.S.
business and liquidation of inventory in all 735 of the Company's
U.S. stores, including stores in Puerto Rico.

                         Propco I Debtors

Toys "R" Us Property Company I, LLC and its subsidiaries own fee
and leasehold interests in more than 300 properties in the United
States.  The Debtors lease the properties on a triple-net basis
under a master lease to Toys-Delaware, the operating entity for all
of TRU's North American businesses, which operates the majority of
the properties as Toys "R" Us stores, Babies "R" Us stores or
side-by-side stores, or subleases them to alternative retailers.

Toys "R" Us Property was founded in 2005 and is headquartered in
Wayne, New Jersey.  Toys 'R' Us Property operates as a subsidiary
of Toys "R" Us Inc.

Company LLC, MAP Real Estate LLC, TRU 2005 RE I LLC, TRU 2005 RE II
Trust, and Wayne Real Estate Company LLC -- Propco I Debtors --
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
E.D. Va. Lead Case No. 18-31429) on March 20, 2018. The Propco I
Debtors sought and obtained procedural consolidation and joint
administration of their Chapter 11 cases, separate from the Toys
"R" Us Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.

The Propco I Debtors estimated assets of $500 million to $1 billion
and liabilities of $500 million to $1 billion.

Judge Keith L. Phillips presides over the Propco I Debtors' cases.

The Propco I Debtors hired Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg, LLP;
and Crowley, Liberatore, Ryan & Brogan, P.C., as co-counsel.  The
Debtors also tapped Kutak Rock LLP.  They hired Goldin Associates,
LLC, as financial advisors.


TRIBUS ENTERPRISES: More Capital Needs Cast Going Concern Doubt
---------------------------------------------------------------
Tribus Enterprises, Inc., filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net and comprehensive loss of $204,694 on $0 of
revenue for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net
and comprehensive loss of $128,522 on $0 of revenue for the same
period in 2017.

At Dec. 31, 2018 the Company had total assets of $1,672,822, total
liabilities of $1,011,691, and $661,131 in total stockholders'
equity.

Chief Executive Officer Kendall Bertagnole states, "During the next
year, the Company's foreseeable cash requirements will relate to
continual development of the operations of its business,
maintaining its good standing and making the requisite filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the payment of expenses
associated with research and development.  The Company may
experience a cash shortfall and be required to raise additional
capital.  Historically, it has mostly relied upon internally
generated funds and funds from the sale of shares of stock to
finance its operations and growth.  Management may raise additional
capital through future public or private offerings of the Company's
stock or through loans from private investors, although there can
be no assurance that it will be able to obtain such financing.  The
Company's failure to do so could have a material and adverse effect
upon it and its shareholders.  There is substantial doubt as to the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/rkSZzX

Tribus Enterprises, Inc. was incorporated in the State of
Washington on March 29, 2017 for the purpose of developing,
designing, manufacturing and distributing hand tools. Upon
incorporation, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement
with Tribus Innovations, LLC and acquired all of the outstanding
ownership interests of Tribus Innovations.  Tribus Innovations was
formed on December 1, 2015.  The transaction was accounted for as a
reverse merger and these financial statements present the
historical financial information of Tribus Innovations from its
inception and include the financial information of the Company from
the completion of the share exchange agreement on March 29, 2017.
The Company has not yet realized revenues from its planned business
activities.


TRIDENT CRATING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Trident Crating & Services, Inc.
        14320 Interdrive East
        Houston, TX 77032

Business Description: Trident Crating & Services Trident Crating &
                      Services, Inc. is a full service
                      manufacturer of wood containers and pallets.

                      Established in 1982, Trident Crating
                      specializes in export preparation of non-
                      perishable items.  The Company offers third
                      party logistics, distribution/warehousing,
                      skidding hood boxing, military packing,
                      vacuum packing, container loading, flat rack
                      loading, securing and shipping of any size
                      project.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas (Houston)

Case No.: 19-30907

Judge: Hon. Jeffrey P. Norman

Debtor's Counsel: Margaret Maxwell McClure, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF MARGARET M. MCCLURE
                  909 Fannin, Suite 3810
                  Houston, TX 77010
                  Tel: 713-659-1333
                  Fax: 713-658-0334
                  Email: margaret@mmmcclurelaw.com

Total Assets: $166,300

Total Liabilities: $1,649,760

The petition was signed by Robert Allmaras, president.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb19-30907_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb19-30907.pdf


TRINIDAD DRILLING: Moody's Withdraws B2 CFR on Debt Repurchase
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has withdrawn Trinidad Drilling Ltd.'s B2
Corporate Family Rating, B2-PD Probability of Default Rating, B3
senior unsecured notes rating, SGL-2 Speculative Grade Liquidity
Rating, and stable outlook.

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Trinidad Drilling Ltd.

  - Outlook, Changed To Rating Withdrawn From Stable

Withdrawals:

Issuer: Trinidad Drilling Ltd.

  - Probability of Default Rating, Withdrawn , previously rated
B2-PD

  - Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Withdrawn , previously
rated SGL-2

  - Corporate Family Rating, Withdrawn , previously rated B2
  
  - Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Withdrawn , previously
rated B3 (LGD4)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's has withdrawn all of Trinidad's ratings following the
repurchase of 99.93% of the outstanding US$350 million senior
unsecured notes due 2025. On January 31, 2019, the amalgamation of
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ensign Energy Services Inc. (Ensign,
unrated) and Trinidad was approved by shareholders, and on February
14, 2019 Ensign used a portion of a US$700 million term loan to
repurchase the Trinidad notes. The amalgamation of the wholly-owned
subsidiary of Ensign and Trinidad was completed on February 15,
2019.


URUS GROUP: Seeks to Hire Richard Siegmeister as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Urus Group LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida to hire Richard Siegmeister, P.A.
as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code, represent the Debtor in negotiation with its
creditors in the preparation of a bankruptcy plan, and provide
other legal services in connection with its Chapter 11 case.

Siegmeister does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor
and its bankruptcy estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Richard Siegmeister, Esq.
     Richard Siegmeister, P.A.
     3850 Bird road, Floor 10
     Miami, FL 33146
     Tel: 305-859-7376
     Email: rspa111@att.net

                       About Urus Group LLC

Urus Group LLC is a privately-held company whose principal assets
are located at 2627 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida.

Urus Group sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-24730) on Nov. 27, 2018.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets of $1 million
to $10 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  The
case is assigned to Judge Jay A. Cristol.  The Debtor tapped
Richard Siegmeister P.A. as its legal counsel.


VAXART INC: KPMG LLP Raises Going Concern Doubt
-----------------------------------------------
Vaxart, Inc. filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
its annual report on Form 10-K, disclosing a net loss of
$18,007,000 on $4,159,000 of total revenue for the year ended Dec.
31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $9,582,000 on $5,839,000 of
total revenue for the year ended in 2017.

KPMG LLP notes in its audit report that the Company has experienced
losses and negative cash flows from operations since its inception,
has an accumulated deficit, and has debt obligations that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.

The Company said, "We have concluded that there is substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one
year after the date that the financial statements are issued.  Our
independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their
report on our financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2018, indicating that, because we have experienced
losses and negative cash flows from operations and have an
accumulated deficit and debt obligations, there is substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  We do not
believe that this substantial doubt has been alleviated.  As of
December 31, 2018, we had $11.5 million of cash and cash
equivalents.  We believe these funds, along with our projected
revenue, are sufficient to fund our operations into, but possibly
not beyond, the second quarter of 2019.  If we are unable to
continue as a going concern, we may be forced to liquidate our
assets and the values we receive for our assets in liquidation or
dissolution could be significantly lower than the values reflected
in our financial statements."

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2018, showed total assets
of $35,227,000, total liabilities of $23,989,000, and total
stockholders' equity of $11,238,000.

A copy of the Form 10-K is available at:

                       https://is.gd/iRR31M

Vaxart, Inc., a clinical-stage company, engages in the discovery
and development of oral recombinant protein vaccines based on its
proprietary oral vaccine platform.  The company's product pipeline
includes tablet vaccines that are designed to protect against
norovirus, seasonal influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus. It
is also developing therapeutic immune-oncology vaccines for
cervical cancer and dysplasia caused by human papillomavirus.  The
company was formerly known as Vaxart Biosciences, Inc. and changed
its name to Vaxart, Inc. in July 2007.  The company was
incorporated in 2004 and is headquartered in South San Francisco,
California.



WHISTLER ENERGY: Baker Hughes' Bid for Reconsideration Junked
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned IN RE: WHISTLER ENERGY II, LLC, SECTION: "H,"
Civil Action No. 18-4202 (E.D. La.), District Judge Jane Triche
Milazzo denied Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, LLC's motion for
reconsideration and second motion to withdraw the reference for
Adversary Number 18-01028.

On March 24, 2016, an involuntary petition for Chapter 11
bankruptcy was filed against Whistler Energy II, LLC. On Jan. 25,
2017, a plan of reorganization was confirmed. As part of the plan,
certain causes of action were transferred and assigned to a
litigation trust. Subsequently, the Trustee of the Whistler Energy
II, LLC Litigation Trust filed a Complaint against Baker Hughes
Oilfield Operations, LLC in bankruptcy court seeking to avoid and
recover an allegedly preferential transfer made to Baker Hughes by
Whistler Energy. Baker Hughes did not submit a proof of claim
against the bankruptcy estate.

On April 24, 2018, Baker Hughes asked this Court to withdraw the
reference of the adversary proceeding. This Court denied its
request, holding that this is a core proceeding, a jury trial is
not yet certain, and the bankruptcy court has the authority to at a
minimum issue a findings of fact and conclusions of law for this
Court's review. The Court noted that "[o]nce it becomes clear that
a jury trial must be conducted, Defendant may re-urge its Motion."
Thereafter, Baker Hughes filed a Motion for Reconsideration of that
decision, which the Trustee opposed.

At the outset, the Court notes that nothing in Baker Hughes's
Motion for Reconsideration persuades the Court to change its prior
opinion or issue a clarification. The Motion does little more than
rehash arguments already considered by this Court. Further, many of
the arguments made therein are either addressed by or irrelevant to
the more recently filed Second Motion for Withdrawal of the
Reference. For those reasons, the Motion for Reconsideration is
denied.

In its Second Motion to Withdraw the Reference, Baker Hughes argues
that withdrawal of the reference is warranted because it has a
right to a jury trial and a trial is now certain in light of the
Bankruptcy Court's setting of the Insolvency Hearing. The Trustee,
however, raises several oppositions to withdrawal of the reference
with which this Court agrees.

First, the Trustee argues that Baker Hughes's actions have resulted
in the waiver of its right to a jury trial on the issue of
insolvency, assuming it was ever entitled to such. The Trustee
points out that in its briefing in the Bankruptcy Court, Baker
Hughes has represented on several occasions its intention to
participate in the Insolvency Hearing set before the Bankruptcy
Court. On Nov. 28, 2018, in its response to the Trustee's Motion
for Summary Judgment, Baker Hughes indicated that it would not be
briefing the issue of the debtor's insolvency because such would
"be the subject of a trial on Jan.  22, 2019."3 It further sought
to compel discovery in advance of the Insolvency Hearing. Most
telling, however, is its failure to move for withdrawal of the
reference for more than a month after the Insolvency Hearing was
set. Waiver of the right to a jury trial may "be inferred from a
party's conduct."4 Here, Baker Hughes's conduct since the setting
of the Insolvency Hearing on Nov. 28, 2018 has indicated its
acquiescence to a trial by the bankruptcy court of the debtor's
insolvency. Further, it is undisputed that Baker Hughes's right to
a jury trial on all other issues before the Bankruptcy Court is not
yet certain. Those issues have been briefed and may be resolved by
dispositive motion without the need for a jury trial.

More compelling, however, is the judicial inefficiency that would
result from withdrawal of the reference at this time. The
Bankruptcy Court has set a hearing on the debtor's insolvency to
resolve an issue common across three different actions brought by
the Trustee. If this Court were to withdraw the reference of this
matter, the same trial would be held before this Court and the
Bankruptcy Court, resulting in the duplication of resources and the
risk of inconsistent verdicts. Such an outcome would be directly
counter to the goals of promoting uniformity in the bankruptcy
court, conserving the debtors' and creditors' resources, and
reducing forum shopping. This Court finds then that the factors
continue to weigh against withdrawal of the reference at this time.
Defendant may re-urge its Motion after the Insolvency Hearing and
all pretrial matters have been adjudicated by the Bankruptcy
Court.

A copy of the Court's Order and Reasons dated Jan. 9, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2Bzpga3 from Leagle.com.

H. Kenneth Lefoldt, Jr., As trustee of the Whistler Energy II, LLC
Litigation Trust, Plaintiff, represented by Amelia Lynn Bueche --
Amelia.Bueche@kellyhart.com -- Kelly Hart & Pitre LLP, Louis M.
Phillips, One American Place & Patrick M. Shelby --
rick.shelby@kellyhart.com -- Kelly Hart & Pitre LLP.

Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, LLC, formerly known as Baker
Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., Defendant, represented by Douglas
Scott Draper -- ddraper@hellerdraper.com -- Heller, Draper,
Patrick, Horn & Manthey LLC & William Ross Spence --
ross@snowspencelaw.com -- Snow Spence Green LLP, pro hac vice.

                    About Whistler Energy II

Romfor Supply Company, Adriatic Marine, L.L.C., Hydra Ops, LLC,
Scientific Drilling, and Patterson Services, Inc., filed an
involuntary Chapter 11 petition against alleged debtor, Houston,
Texas-based Whistler Energy II, LLC (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No.
16-10661) on March 24, 2016.  Whistler Energy II on May 25, 2016,
consented to the Chapter 11 filed and pending before the Honorable
Jerry A. Brown in Bankruptcy Court in New Orleans.

Romfor Supply, et al., are represented by Stewart F. Peck, Esq., in
New Orleans, Louisiana.

Whistler Energy II has employed Paul J. Goodwine, Esq., and Taylor
P. Gay, Esq., at Looper Goodwine; and John P. Melko, Esq., Michael
K. Riordan, Esq., and Sharon Beausoleil, Esq., at Gardere Wynne
Sewell as counsel; UpShot Services LLC as its claims, noticing and
balloting agent; and TDF Partners, LLC's Richard DiMichele as its
chief restructuring officer.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has retained Stewart
F. Peck, Esq., Christopher Caplinger, Esq., Benjamin W. Kadden,
Esq., Joseph P. Briggett, Esq., and Erin R. Rosenberg, Esq., at
Lugenbuhl, Wheaton, Peck, Rankin & Hubbard, as counsel.


WOODBRIDGE GROUP: Bankruptcy Court Disallows ERC/Brill Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Kevin J. Carey sustained Woodbridge Group of
Companies, LLC's objection to claim numbers 9407 and 9423 filed
pro-se by Alan Brill on behalf of ERC I, LLC, and claim numbers
9424 and 9425 filed by Brill on behalf of himself.

The Debtors seek disallowance and expungement of the ERC/Brill
claims on the basis of res judicata in light of prior decisions
rendered in Indiana state court litigation, not on substantive
grounds. The Debtors contend that Brill's claims are the same as
the previously litigated ERC claims and are barred by res
judicata.

The Court looks to Indiana state law to determine whether res
judicata applies in this case. Four requirements must be satisfied
for a claim to be precluded under the doctrine of res judicata:

   (1) the former judgment must have been rendered by a court of
competent jurisdiction,

   (2) the former judgment must have been rendered on its merits,

   (3) the matter now in issue was, or could have been, determined
in the prior action, and

   (4) the controversy adjudicated in the former action must have
been between parties to the present suit or their privies.

First, it is undisputed that the judgment was rendered by a court
of competent jurisdiction. The foreclosure action was brought in
the jurisdiction where the real property was located, which was
proper. Second, the judgment was rendered on the merits. The trial
court presented findings based on facts, and those findings of
facts and conclusions of law were affirmed on appeal. Third, the
matter in issue was, or could have been, determined in the prior
state court action. The ERC claims were litigated in state court.
Brill did not assert claims on his own behalf in state court but
chose instead to litigate those issues through ERC. Although
assigned different claim numbers, the ERC/Brill claims are the
same; and thus, the claims filed in bankruptcy court are the same
as those previously litigated in Indiana state court.

Here, the issue of true contention is that of privity. This prong
requires that the controversy adjudicated in a former action must
have been between parties to the present suit or their privies. The
term privity describes interests that connect persons so that one
might not be party to an action but still be bound by it. An entity
need not control a prior action for privity to exist. For the
purpose of res judicata, the court looks beyond the nominal parties
and treats those whose interests are involved as the real parties.
Brill is undoubtedly in privity with ERC. Brill is the chief
executive of ERC. Brill participated in the Indiana state court
litigation on behalf of ERC and testified at length throughout the
proceedings. Brill acted on behalf of ERC in executing the loan
documents with Riverdale. While Brill states that he does not have
voting control of ERC, it is clear that he has practical control
and, further, that he considers himself able to act with authority
on behalf of ERC in the pre-petition loan proceedings and
throughout the state court litigation, as well as in this
bankruptcy case.” For these reasons, Brill is in privity with
ERC.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum dated Feb. 14, 2019 is available
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb17-12560-3403.pdf

                   About Woodbridge Group

Headquartered in Sherman Oaks, California, The Woodbridge Group
Enterprise -- http://www.woodbridgecompanies.com/-- is a
comprehensive real estate finance and development company.  Its
principal business is buying, improving, and selling high-end
luxury homes.  The Woodbridge Group Enterprise also owns and
operates full-service real estate brokerages, a private investment
company, and real estate lending operations.  The Woodbridge Group
Enterprise and its management team have been in the business of
providing a variety of financial products for more than 35 years,
and have been primarily focused on the luxury home business for the
past five years.  Since its inception, the Woodbridge Group
Enterprise has completed more than $1 billion in financial
transactions.  These transactions involve real estate, note buying
and selling, hard money lending, and alternative financial
transactions involving thousands of investors.

Woodbridge Group of Companies and certain of its affiliates filed
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
17-12560) on Dec. 4, 2017.  Woodbridge estimated assets and
liabilities at between $500 million and $1 billion.  The Chapter 11
cases are being jointly administered.

Judge Kevin J. Carey presides over the case.

Samuel A. Newman, Esq., Oscar Garza, Esq., Daniel B. Denny, Esq.,
Jennifer L. Conn, Esq., Eric J. Wise, Esq., Matthew K. Kelsey,
Esq., and Matthew P. Porcelli, Esq., at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher,
LLP, and Sean M. Beach, Esq., Edmon L. Morton, Esq., Ian J.
Bambrick, Esq., and Allison S. Mielke, Esq., at Young Conaway
Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.
Homer Bonner Jacobs, PA, as special counsel, Province, Inc., as
expert consultant, Moelis & Company LLC, as investment banker.

The Debtors' financial advisors are Larry Perkins, John Farrace,
Robert Shenfeld, Reece Fulgham, Miles Staglik, and Lissa Weissman
at SierraConstellation Partners, LLC.  Beilinson Advisory Group is
serving as independent management to the Debtors.  Garden City
Group, LLC, is the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones is counsel to the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors; and FTI Consulting, Inc., serves as its
financial advisor.

An official committee of unsecured creditors was appointed in the
Chapter 11 cases on Dec. 14, 2017.  On Jan. 23, 2018, the Court
approved a settlement providing for the formation of an ad hoc
noteholder group and an ad hoc unitholder group.


WOODBRIDGE GROUP: Liquidation Plan Confirmed, Exits Chapter 11
--------------------------------------------------------------
Woodbridge Group of Companies, LLC, on Feb. 19, 2019, disclosed
that, effective as of Feb. 15, 2019, it has emerged from chapter 11
bankruptcy following confirmation of its plan of liquidation (the
"Plan") by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware on October 26, 2018.

Woodbridge also announced that it is targeting an initial cash
distribution to take place on or before March 31, 2019.  Claims
that are not Allowed Claims as of that time will not participate in
that initial distribution, but reserves for such Claims will be
maintained.

[Tues]day's announcement effectuates a global settlement negotiated
between the Woodbridge debtors (managed by a Bankruptcy
Court-approved independent Board of Managers), the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors, the Ad Hoc Group of Noteholders,
and the Ad Hoc Group of Unitholders, which settlement is embodied
in the Plan.  The Plan, which enjoyed overwhelming support from
creditors, provides for the creation of two entities: (i) a
Wind-Down Entity, which will own many of Woodbridge's assets
(including all real property) and will sell those assets to
generate cash, and (ii) a Liquidation Trust, which will own the
Wind-Down Entity and receive cash generated by the Wind-Down
Entity, and will own estate claims and causes of action.
Woodbridge's unsecured creditors (including investors holding notes
and units) will receive interests in the Liquidation Trust
("Liquidation Trust Interests") which will entitle them to cash
distributions over time from the Liquidation Trust.  Liquidation
Trust Interests will be maintained as book entries by the
Liquidation Trust; holders of Liquidation Trust Interests will not
receive paper certificates in respect of such Liquidation Trust
Interests.  Woodbridge expects that the process of liquidating all
of the assets to be held by the Wind-Down Entity will take
approximately two-to-three years.

Woodbridge filed bankruptcy in December 2017 as a result of a
massive, multi-year Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Robert Shapiro
between (at least) 2012 and 2017.  As part of this fraud, Shapiro,
through the Woodbridge entities, raised over one billion dollars
from approximately 10,000 investors—as either noteholders or
unitholders.  Woodbridge and the three fiduciary committees
appointed in the bankruptcy cases worked in concert to reach the
global settlement represented by the Plan to ensure that creditors
can recover as much money as possible, and believe that the Plan
provides the best possible outcome under the circumstances.

Under the Plan, the Liquidation Trust Interests to be distributed
to creditors shall initially be subject to transfer restrictions
that prohibit assignment or transfer by any holder thereof other
than by will or intestate succession or otherwise by operation of
law.  Two classes of Liquidation Trust Interests will be
distributed—(i) Class A Liquidation Trust Interests, which will
be distributed to holders of Allowed Class 3 Standard Note Claims,
Allowed Class 4 General Unsecured Claims, and Allowed Class 5 Unit
Claims, and (ii) Class B Liquidation Trust Interests, which will be
distributed only to holders of Allowed Class 5 Unit Claims, and
which will receive distributions only after all claims represented
by Class A Liquidation Trust Interests have been paid in full.  

The Liquidation Trust will use its commercially reasonable best
efforts to cause registration of the Class A Liquidation Trust
Interests under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange
Act") to become effective, and for the Class A Liquidation Trust
Interests to be quoted with an OTC ticker symbol, as soon as
reasonably practicable after the Effective Date, but in no event
will the Liquidation Trust file such registration statement any
later than may be required under section 12(g) of the Exchange Act
or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.  Upon the
effectiveness of such Exchange Act registration, (i) the transfer
restrictions on Class A Liquidation Trust Interests shall terminate
and cease to be of any force or effect and (ii) the Class A
Liquidation Trust Interests may be transferred by the holders
thereof to the extent otherwise permissible under applicable law.
The Liquidation Trust does not expect that Class B Liquidation
Trust Interests will be registered under the Exchange Act.

The Liquidation Trustee will be Mr. Michael Goldberg, who was a
member of the Bankruptcy Court-approved independent Board of
Managers of the Woodbridge debtors in their chapter 11 cases (and
was designated to such Board by the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission), and who was unanimously selected as the
Liquidation Trustee by the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors, the Ad Hoc Group of Noteholders, and the Ad Hoc Group of
Unitholders.  In addition, the Liquidation Trust Supervisory Board
will consist of five members—three selected by the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors, and one each selected by the Ad
Hoc Group of Noteholders and the Ad Hoc Group of Unitholders.

The CEO of the Wind-Down Entity will be Mr. Frederick Chin, who was
the Bankruptcy Court-approved CEO of the Woodbridge debtors in
their chapter 11 cases.  The Wind-Down Board will consist of three
members: (i) Mr. Chin (the Wind-Down CEO), (ii) Mr. M. Freddie
Reiss, and (iii) Mr. Richard Nevins.  Messrs. Reiss and Nevins were
both members of the Bankruptcy Court-approved independent Board of
Managers of the Woodbridge debtors in their chapter 11 cases.

Copies of the Plan and all other Court documents may be examined
free of charge on the website of the Debtors' claims agent at
http://cases.gardencitygroup.com/wgc. Additional information,
including answers to frequently asked questions, may be found at
the Liquidation Trust's website, available at
http://www.pszjlaw.com/woodbridge.html.

                    About Woodbridge Group

Headquartered in Sherman Oaks, California, The Woodbridge Group
Enterprise -- http://www.woodbridgecompanies.com/-- is a
comprehensive real estate finance and development company.  Its
principal business is buying, improving, and selling high-end
luxury homes.  The Woodbridge Group Enterprise also owns and
operates full-service real estate brokerages, a private investment
company, and real estate lending operations.  The Woodbridge Group
Enterprise and its management team have been in the business of
providing a variety of financial products for more than 35 years,
and have been primarily focused on the luxury home business for the
past five years.  Since its inception, the Woodbridge Group
Enterprise has completed more than $1 billion in financial
transactions.  These transactions involve real estate, note buying
and selling, hard money lending, and alternative financial
transactions involving thousands of investors.

Woodbridge Group of Companies and certain of its affiliates filed
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
17-12560) on Dec. 4, 2017.  Woodbridge estimated assets and
liabilities at between $500 million and $1 billion.  The Chapter 11
cases are being jointly administered.

Judge Kevin J. Carey presides over the case.

Samuel A. Newman, Esq., Oscar Garza, Esq., Daniel B. Denny, Esq.,
Jennifer L. Conn, Esq., Eric J. Wise, Esq., Matthew K. Kelsey,
Esq., and Matthew P. Porcelli, Esq., at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher,
LLP, and Sean M. Beach, Esq., Edmon L. Morton, Esq., Ian J.
Bambrick, Esq., and Allison S. Mielke, Esq., at Young Conaway
Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.
Homer Bonner Jacobs, PA, as special counsel, Province, Inc., as
expert consultant, Moelis & Company LLC, as investment banker.

The Debtors' financial advisors are Larry Perkins, John Farrace,
Robert Shenfeld, Reece Fulgham, Miles Staglik, and Lissa Weissman
at SierraConstellation Partners, LLC.  Beilinson Advisory Group is
serving as independent management to the Debtors.  Garden City
Group, LLC, is the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones is counsel to the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors; and FTI Consulting, Inc., serves as its
financial advisor.

An official committee of unsecured creditors was appointed in the
Chapter 11 cases on Dec. 14, 2017.  On Jan. 23, 2018, the Court
approved a settlement providing for the formation of an ad hoc
noteholder group and an ad hoc unitholder group.


XPO LOGISTICS: Moody's Rates $1BB Sr. Unsecured Notes 'Ba3'
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba3 rating to XPO Logistics,
Inc.'s new senior unsecured notes. All other ratings, including the
Ba2 Corporate Family Rating, the Baa3 senior secured rating, the
Ba3 rating on existing senior unsecured notes and the stable
outlook remain unchanged. Proceeds from the $1.0 billion notes will
be used to fund a portion of XPO's recently announced $1.5 billion
share repurchase program as well as to pay down some debt.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba2 Corporate Family Rating reflects XPO's leading position in
a diverse set of markets including contract logistics, freight
brokerage, less-than-truckload, and last mile. Moody's expects
XPO's growing scale as well as on-going investments in
infrastructure and technology to continue to provide meaningful
value-add to its diversified customer base. During 2019, Moody's
anticipates earnings growth in the high single-digits, although it
notes that the outlook for XPO's European operations has softened
and that over the last few months XPO has revised its earnings
guidance downward several times (in part due to the recent loss of
a substantial amount of business with the company's largest
customer).

XPO's senior secured debt is rated two notches above the CFR at
Baa3, reflecting meaningful secured collateral support, especially
from the Con-way assets, and the significant cushion against loss
provided by the senior unsecured notes, which are rated Ba3, one
notch below the CFR to account for the higher claims burden from
the term loan. The senior secured rating of Baa3 and the senior
unsecured rating of Ba3 are both one notch below ratings indicated
from the LGD model output, to account for its expectations that
incurrence of future indebtedness is likely to be in part financed
by senior secured indebtedness.

The stable outlook reflects the secular tailwinds in the logistics
industry and generally favorable conditions in transportation
markets, both of which are expected to support a stable operating
profile.

The ratings could be upgraded if Debt-to-EBITDA was expected to
remain around or below 3.0x. An upgrade would be based on the
expectation that XPO will balance its aggressive growth strategy
and any future shareholder returns against a prudent financial
policy. Maintenance of a very good liquidity profile with
FCF-to-Debt at least in the mid-single-digits along with the
expectation that EBITDA margins will remain comfortably in the high
single-digits would be a prerequisite to any upgrade.

The ratings could be downgraded if Debt-to-EBITDA was expected to
remain above 4.0x. Weakening liquidity such that XPO became reliant
on revolver borrowings or if FCF-to-Debt was expected to stay in
the low-single digits could lead to a downgrade. Expectations of a
meaningful weakening of transportation markets or reduced
profitability such that EBITDA margins were anticipated to remain
below 7% could also result in downward rating pressure.

Issuer: XPO Logistics, Inc.

The following ratings were assigned:

$1.0 billion senior unsecured notes, assigned Ba3 (LGD4)

XPO Logistics, Inc. ("XPO"), headquartered in Greenwich, CT, is
leading provider of supply chain solutions to a broad set of
customers across multiple industries including retail/e-commerce,
food & beverage, industrial/manufacturing, and automotive. Service
offerings include contract logistics, freight brokerage,
less-than-truckload, last mile and intermodal. The company
generates 59% of sales in the U.S., 13% in France, 12% in the U.K.
and 16% in other countries. Revenues for the twelve months ended
December 2018 were approximately $17.3 billion.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global Surface
Transportation and Logistics Companies published in May 2017.


[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings
-------------------------------------------------------
In re Yongming Sui
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10781
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 31, 2019
         represented by: Javier H. Castillo, Esq.
                         CASTILLO LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: jhcecf@gmail.com

In re Frank Investments, Inc.
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-11454
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 31, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb19-11454.pdf
         represented by: Bradley S Shraiberg, Esq.
                         SHRAIBERG LANDAU & PAGE PA
                         E-mail: bss@slp.law

In re William Shane Pertl
   Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 19-10162
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 31, 2019
         represented by: William Shane Pertl, Esq.
                         E-mail: mark@lazzolaw.com

In re Peter James O'Keefe, SR
   Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-10357
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 31, 2019
         represented by: Dax B. Grantham  , Esq.
                         GRANTHAM LAW, LLC
                         E-mail: notices@grantham.law

In re Fortune Transportation LTD
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-12049
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 31, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Elisol LLC
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-70797
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 31, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Phuong Nam Vietnamese Restaurant, LLC
   Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-60132
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 31, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nynb19-60132.pdf
         represented by: Peter Alan Orville, Esq.
                         ORVILLE & MCDONALD LAW, PC
                         E-mail: peteropc@gmail.com

In re RCJM, Inc.
   Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-10161
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 31, 2019
         represented by: Arthur G. Baumeister, Jr., Esq.
                         BAUMEISTER DENZ LLP
                         E-mail: abaumeister@bdlegal.net

In re Eduardo Morales Acevedo and Aleida Rojas Aquino
   Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 19-00467
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 31, 2019
         represented by: Victor Gratacos Diaz, Esq.
                         GRATACOS LAW FIRM, PSC
                         E-mail: bankruptcy@gratacoslaw.com

In re Caguas Copy Equipment Inc.
   Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 19-00470
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 31, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb19-00470.pdf
         represented by: Victor Gratacos Diaz, Esq.
                         GRATACOS LAW FIRM, PSC
                         E-mail: bankruptcy@gratacoslaw.com

In re Thomas Michael Hennings
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-30298
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 31, 2019
         represented by: Christopher J. Moser, Esq.
                         QUILLINGSELANDER LOWNDS WINSLETT & MOSER
                         E-mail: cmoser@qslwm.com

In re Tod Charles Turner
   Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 19-10333
      Chapter 11 Petition filed January 31, 2019
         represented by: Sarah Weaver, Esq.
                         E-mail: sarah.weaver@weaverlaw.net

In re Sepideh Sally Cirino
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10402
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 1, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Peter B. Evans
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 19-50216
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 1, 2019
         represented by: William W. Winters, Esq.
                         THE MLNARIK LAW GROUP, INC.
                         E-mail: william@mlnariklaw.com

In re Miss Claudy Seide
   Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-10393
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 1, 2019
         represented by: Michael Van Dam, Esq.
                         VAN DAM LAW LLP
                         E-mail: mvandam@vandamlawllp.com

In re Zvah Inc.
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-10318
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 1, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb19-10318.pdf
         represented by: Lawrence Morrison, Esq.
                         MORRISON TENENBAUM, PLLC
                         E-mail: lmorrison@m-t-law.com

In re Leonard P. Rerek
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-22182
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 1, 2019
         represented by: H. Bruce Bronson, Jr., Esq.
                         BRONSON LAW OFFICES, P.C.
                         E-mail: ecf@bronsonlaw.net

In re Miles Scott McCormick
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 19-50223
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 3, 2019
         represented by: Arasto Farsad, Esq.
                         FARSAD LAW OFFICES
                         E-mail: FarsadECF@gmail.com

In re JRND LLC
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-00774
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb19-00774.pdf
         represented by: Jeffrey Ainsworth, Esq.
                         BRANSONLAW PLLC
                         E-mail: jeff@bransonlaw.com

In re A Slice of New York Inc.
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-00955
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Cristina Diana Davison
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-11590
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         represented by: David W. Langley, Esq.
                         E-mail: dave@flalawyer.com

In re Gregory G. Roy and Regine Roy
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-11609
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         represented by: David W. Langley, Esq.
                         E-mail: dave@flalawyer.com

In re 1428 Valley View Road Bernstein Land Trust
   Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-51912
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Ronald E. Buschmann
   Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case No. 19-90168
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         represented by: William P. Harbison, Esq.
                         SEILLER WATERMAN LLC
                         E-mail: harbison@derbycitylaw.com

In re Stephen Anthony Carroll
   Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 19-11499
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         represented by: L. Jeanette Rice, Esq.
                         WALSH, BECKER & RICE
                         E-mail: riceesq@att.net

In re Joseph G Gorski
   Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 19-11500
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         represented by: Steven L. Goldberg, Esq.
                         MCNAMEE HOSEA ET AL.
                         E-mail: sgoldberg@mhlawyers.com

In re Bennett Trucking & Logging, LLC
   Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 19-00488
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nceb19-00488.pdf
         represented by: William P. Janvier, Esq.
                         JANVIER LAW FIRM, PLLC
                         E-mail: bill@janvierlaw.com

In re Dennis Keith Bennett
   Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 19-00489
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         represented by: William P. Janvier, Esq.
                         JANVIER LAW FIRM, PLLC
                         E-mail: bill@janvierlaw.com

In re Jeffrey D. Hicks
   Bankr. D. Neb. Case No. 19-80178
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         represented by: Samuel J. Turco, Jr., Esq.
                         SAM TURCO LAW OFFICES
                         E-mail: sam.turco@samturcolawoffices.com

In re Morgan Wayne Woelk and Vickie Lyn Woelk
   Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 19-00674
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         represented by: LEFKOVITZ AND LEFKOVITZ, PLLC
                         E-mail: slefkovitz@lefkovitz.com

In re Karen Kaye Watson
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-30451
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         represented by: Bruce W. Akerly, Esq.
                         AKERLY LAW PLLC
                         E-mail: bakerly@akerlylaw.com

In re Fresh Wind Fresh Fire Ministries
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-30464
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-30464.pdf
         represented by: Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
                         ERIC A. LIEPINS, P.C.
                         E-mail: eric@ealpc.com

In re Telatnyk RE Investments, Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-30471
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-30471.pdf
         represented by: Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq.
                         JOYCE W. LINDAUER ATTORNEY, PLLC
                         E-mail: joyce@joycelindauer.com

In re Rynox Realty, LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-30474
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-30474.pdf
         represented by: Robert C. Newark, III, Esq.
                         A NEWARK FIRM
                         E-mail: office@newarkfirm.com

In re Khuu & Associates, The Affordable Law Group, PLLC
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-40474
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-40474.pdf
         represented by: Michael Kent Canada, Esq.
                         KENT CANADA ATTORNEY
                         E-mail: kentcanada@gmail.com

In re Mal-Hadr LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-30664
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Royce J. Hassell
   Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-30694
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         represented by: Erin E. Jones, Esq.
                         ERIN E. JONES, P.C.
                         E-mail: erin@erinjoneslaw.com

In re VCLC Holdings, LLC
   Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 19-50231
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         Filed Pro Se

In re Martha Ann Contreras
   Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 19-50254
      Chapter 11 Petition filed February 4, 2019
         represented by: David T. Cain, Esq.
                         E-mail: caindt@swbell.net


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2019.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***